The URL can be used to link to this page

08/20/1985 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL AUGUST 20, 1985 6:30 P.H. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES IIII. 6:37 - TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE -VIV. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS I VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS r 7-Z A. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility ease- ments in Sun Cliff 5th Addition B. Public Hearing for IDB Funding of $400,000 for Office // Building in Knob Hill Professional Park (Richard Nordlund) C. Public Hearing for Renewal of Conditional Use Permit for Werner Lembke, Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke let Addition in SE 1/2 of Section 13 VII. OLD BUSINESS 22 'pppp 4 A. UPS Building Permit L ,?,g B. IDB Entitlement Funding A. Fire Department C. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department D. Public Works Department �. v. 6:55 CONSENT AGENDA �O A. Personnel Items B. Contractor Licenses C. Excavation Permit #EX33-155, Brittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) D. Project 459, Receive Petition/Authorize a Feasibility Report P (Brittany'9th Addition - Streets & Utilities) 9 E. Project 460, Authorize Feasibility Report (Nicola Road - Streets) �)D F. Final Plat Approval, Woodhaven Addition (Terry Stover) �.I1. G. Final Plat approval, UPS 1st Addition (United Parcel Service, Inc.) H. Vacation o£ Drainage & Utility Easements, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Meadowlands Addition) -fes /Q I. Contract 84-20, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Cliff d gyp•/d J. Commercial Park - Streets & Utilities) Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing 1 (Miscellaneous Projects) P /q K. Development Contract Amendments - Time Extensions for Public Improvements (Miscellaneous Contracts) L. Notice of Default/Intent to File on Performance Bond (Century Addition and Crossroads of Eagan) �( M. Change Order #2 for Project 85-14, Parks Improvement 1 Contract VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS r 7-Z A. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility ease- ments in Sun Cliff 5th Addition B. Public Hearing for IDB Funding of $400,000 for Office // Building in Knob Hill Professional Park (Richard Nordlund) C. Public Hearing for Renewal of Conditional Use Permit for Werner Lembke, Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke let Addition in SE 1/2 of Section 13 VII. OLD BUSINESS 22 'pppp 4 A. UPS Building Permit L ,?,g B. IDB Entitlement Funding VIII. NEW BUSINESS f/b A. Conditional Use Permit for Community Action Council (Frank TBrennan to Allow a Shelter for Battered Women, Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, NW 1/4 of Section 30 P,t�9 B. Conditional Use Permit for Flour Bin Addition (Rey Anderson, Jr. for a Pylon Sign Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Flour Bin Addition, Section 31 p 5�7 C. Preliminary Plat for Spande 7th Addition (Roy Spends) Containing 4 Single -Family Lots on 3.4 Acres on Part of Gov't. Lot 7 in Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 4 D. Rezoning For Wyndham Corporate Center (Kirt Woodhouse, Trammell Crow Co.) of Approximately 21 Acres to a Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Which Would Contain 1 Lot and 1 Outlot in Pt. of the SW -174—of the NE 1/4 of Section 4 �9 P E. Preliminary Plat for Wedgwood 2nd Addition (Brad Swenson/ Jim Curry Consisting of Approximately 10 Acres and Containing 22 Lots on Outlot C, Wedgwood let Addition, Section 26 /p F. Preliminary Plat for Lemay Lake Hills (Al Kempf/Martin Shields Consisting of Approximately 13.69 acres containing 8 Single Family Lots & 40 Apartment Units and Rezoning to a Planned Development Located in Part of the NW 174 o£ Section 10, North of Towerview Road G. Preliminary Plat for Suncliff 3rd Addition (Robert Carlson) Consisting of 13.5 Acres Containing 5 Duplex Lots and Four 12 -Unit Multiple Bldgs. in Pt. of NW 1/4 & NE 1/4 of Sec.29 H. Wine & Beer License for Hong Wong Restaurant, Cedar -Cliff r / Shopping Center (3 j I. Final Resolution for Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for Forest Ridge Addition /3� J. LaFonda De Acebo Liquor License I%. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 7°./L-6 A. Contract 85-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedar Industrial Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) NZ, B. Contract 85-20, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington 7Square 2nd Addition - Trunk & Sanitary Sewer) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %I. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 15, 1985 SUBJECT: AGENDA After approval of the August 6, 1985, regular minutes, special City Council minutes for the July the agenda for the August 20, 1985, City Council following items are in order for consideration: Y 1?;V1 City Council 23 meeting and meeting, the There are two (2) real estate tax reductions being proposed by 40 the Dakota County Assessor's office. The real estate abatements under consideration are as follows: 1) Gregory Kranz - The house is in extremely poor condition for its age. It had been on the market for 12 months with no offers and finally sold for $100,000. It has extremely creaky floors, condensation between the window panes on 508 of the windows, poor quality cabinets and leaky plumbing. The estimated market value should be reduced from $106,100 to $88,200. A location map showing this property is on page114 . 2) Donald Donahue - The house was not entered during the reassessment - owner • called, did a review. The estimated market value should be reduced from $124,600 to $115,700. These notes are reproduced from Mr. Peterson who is proposing the tax abatements. Refer to the enclosed map on page$ that was prepared by the Engineering Department for a review of this property description. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the tax abatements as presented by the Dakota County Assessor's office. c 9 ': N ,• Ls, F •11WW 1, f �r 8 I: Y' n• •x '.`n'rA b �� y, g/t�ie[s• °�W! NI I.. ••a1, : R -_ .ri 4+; Nr�„ b`_rAh, uib Kr �•.•'rrx'r "'lf�'�; •iris• t • !.`• if ci. o°I p• • P• "1:' 'o AtlM K� 9''I° B.A.c,'t xw +•�, •, " 6 . m a. a .. x � N 'i: r. 9 .i - = _ _� _,' J t.r,,. n» bn ba .z b . aua•r a ..i.x u.r ww uw e "o w lxbr � :' �$ • •' • Y oY N N N x'C O N Fr' - o o r Y N\ 1'„5 ” .. •y w 4�.r .w.r � • 3 '" i. \e� •s ',.� e•lo'ib so R e:ae; I • '' l++v1�•�a`.K bxo ,•rv. rem a•[[:• f �• ..,rr.•••, :C..-.. .....• ...N -HI Y ; • L -"+y-_BEACpry :K •,re ;.w •:: r, •+» » uou kin': [a x• brum •r•• •. ♦�+ ��,•i n ;d�iari?''.w =\�9y e!�i.:'�.. mCg Y � �L � N �i=fYY$+a.•',,.• � �: r t � eg �+ j.f;::;�Y. .. xnew Im .n so »w ♦ .+ ..y. CD r•r.r Dr Y = rnp n° �zt':'i7 '9. ' �[� - .f Rk o • L Q i n[ a •• •i v• a ' •>.:+• , ..ti L, r e e bnY n +` •...Ny 82lR> u,r• R• -•$ _ /!\ C r :: •;'bf 9r ��+ .' •vex,$ r — eoyr^ IJ'W u1,1. • • Y ... N``• a • rld, •Je^+ $sf. +e.� Nn ,do N aV ., N ' .•y ,. a Y^ • b�i�� .ix�s •• S :L �;1, �'9rn, "a�n je O1xrt • a '�' DRIVE+ 'xY• • I ■ • r• 8 '" . • <y,.y Ti i • N oo C1 -t• n. ea rxr. xa •a` �,rM c g Z • � 4 4 s!'r• '. • •'z•�: I'Q�'G n�a ' .q •^AL �. 's Yr: �f[ Vie: e y _ 'S'/ y u XPi • "^'•5 ti > w • � �� •.r�\_,;.•.X941• :� xYur y i I S d+'x vv C\ "4 N • Y 4: M.. • . 5 Z 11 � . • n\y � •1}.04 aa� e.. aH.,oi 1 b/Ih It - L•• N o +:1 B o ,•rr J ,d[ d .,,• b r, a. •x > /i > .° s b-,. Y Ci b,y • + Ayl ., •! . ..bS oBr nyr >ary .."�,A•' �w�• k� •erg ;"r m URT dL IR r " ^, °, ,•, rsx mor a• i•,:o i/L. c- �'• s* ,boy y� + • N f B "� Y .S ,. • �Ii Y uT. _ rx-,J � i'"� • b - •°b r 4 •'3 r,- r � • •° c R lS a, P ��• Y 1• yY• •, Y' e'e!y4 ., .r°,'Po+ N 0 = .. ,•. , C,gMeq o •xe� ,�,�y •i •. 'y°4•'y- Se. i -vs,ua • !i e ' AOo fa0o : b; 41,' ppI b 4 I1��r Lp e�, /.G' RO. D.na.-- -:: P.ia C:• Yy1 - iJ-�,'• ; ff• '^ !. ,`. •'+har. a,m a �` u s V, X^ Yry. •aow �•, .. • Y• 'w 're.rwu- s•'vmY'`N r:S z 3 yA ,a .7 bw •r9. �• X96 x: "'•are $. • .$ AT' • r _ . v .{ ,+ z _ g el: ax•.x Y Y • t j [ r n' [r• x• oe CD O ca 1 O J 'N `< co 0 O O a) I m 00N O 0) D-onald Donahue 10-84352-100-01 —20 .... . AIN Ss TY - �i I )rouRrHT G.,sl RU YD. ER DOC.NO. ;81033 N I iWt? ss'e fR Lj 23 20 I 725 21 19 lx, F w 16 -0.. I POND IEP 1917 VILDMARK 2 21 ..e �.w "I • z 52 10 12 IT I" fi 16 RUN -' z D I 3 Rio BIC. 10 11 1 U S .City of Eogah 030-00 015_�52 - POND A 7 lot. b'h 016-52 Agenda Information Memo August_20, 1985, City.Council Meeting Page Two A. FIRE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under the Fire Department at this time. B. POLICE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered for the Police Department at this time. C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • Please see the Informative Memo for the Parks and Recreation Department's Compost Program Report. The Director of Paiks and Recreation will be at the City Council meeting on Tuesday and will be available to field questions at that time. D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Woodhaven Addition - Request for Building Permit Prior to Final Plat Recording -- Enclosed on page., is a request received from Mr. Terry Stover requesting consideration for the issuance of building permits prior to recording of the final plat. Final plat approval is scheduled for favorable Council action under the Consent Agenda. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the request • for building permits prior to the recording of the final plat for the Woodhaven Addition. 2. Contract 85-5 (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer), Resolution Requesting MnDOT Cost Participation -- In the feasibility report for Project 428 which discussed the installation of the trunk storm sewer through the Cedar Industrial Park, this trunk storm sewer will be providing drainage of certain state owned lands and rights-of-way. Previous discussion with MnDOT indicates that they have agreed to participate for their proportionate share of run-off into our storm sewer system. However, this requires a formal resolution to be passed by Council action requesting MnDOT cost participation so that they can prepare the appropriate agreements for formal Council approval at a later date. A copy of the resolution will be provided for Council's review and consideration at the meeting on August 20. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To pass a resolution request- ing MnDOT cost participation for Project 428 (Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm sewer) under City Contract 85-5 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CZ Eagan City Council Dear Mayor and Council Members: wcoo Mgve" Aboir,ov August 10, 1985 It is my request that you will, along with final plat approval, grant a building permit (subject to the Building Department plan approval) to commence immediately with construction. This is a very small project that is being developed as a zero lot line developement and this would allow us to survey the footings and foundation walls after the basement is complete. The granting of this request would make the final platting considerably easier and would save approximately four to five weeks of valuable construction time and allow the project to be finalized before winter closes in. It should be noted that all of the city requirements (developement contract, plans and cash escrow) have been met and upon the start of construction the survey will be completed and immediately sent to the county for final platting. Thank you for your consideration, '=q�n _':� . Terry E Stover W1 RECEIVED AUG - 9 19ff Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Three 3. Project 449, Country Club Market - Landscaping -- The Public Works Director has been contacted by Mr. Bob Nelson, the operations manager for the Country Club Market, expressing his total objection to the project recently approved by Council action on July 16, 1985. They strenously object to the extension of the driveway as providing no benefit to their property. In addition, they will resist any attempt to acquire the temporary easements necessary to eliminate the existing island located near their loading docks. Mr. Nelson also states that the proposal for the driveway extension was not originally proposed under Project 373 (storm sewer and driveway) which eliminated the rural ditch section and where the landscaping was originally proposed to be installed in front of the Country Club Market. They feel that an additional burden is being placed on them due to their noncompliance with performing the landscaping that was agreed to by Mr. Sheldon Kranz, who is no longer with that company. I response, Mr. Nelson has submitted a letter enclosed on page n wherein they will agree to proceed with the landscaping previously proposed by the Council with certain conditions and the understanding that the recently approved project will not proceed. This item should be discussed in detail so that proper direction can be given to the Public Works Director for response to Country Club Market. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the request from Country Club Market pertaining to Project 449 and provide direction to the staff regarding progress of this project. • 4 E �.'Qounlry SlnF 3&rkr1 C�IIun#r Club �arhet 4 nr_ 1 THREE THOUSAND FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 612-920-9337 F.ErEt'dED JVd August 8, 1985 Mr. Tom Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Colbert: Country Club Market, Inc. will agree to pay up to $3,000.00 for landscaping for the purpose of screening the back of our stores loading dock area at 3820 Sibley Memorial Highway. Country Club will only agree to this if the City of Eagan installs the landscaping and guarantees the growth of these plantings. In the event snowplowing, road salt, etc. damage or kills any of these plantings, Country Club Market, Inc. will not be held responsible for replanting or replacement of this area. BN: dm Sincerely, Bob Nelson Operations Manager Country Club Market, Inc. Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Four There are ( 13 ) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed form the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS Personnel Items --Item 1. Park Maintenance Worker --A vacancy was created with the resignation of Doug Berans, Park Maintenance • Worker. The Parks & Recreation Department is recommending that Richard Pelletier be hired to fill his vacancy. Mr. Pelletier has successfully completed the City's physical examination requirement. His startinq date is 8/26. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Mr. Pelletier as a Park Maintenance Worker. Personnel Items --Item 2. Planning Intern --The City Planner is recommending that Steven Schwanke be hired as Planning Intern. The position is temporary with an expected six (6) month duration and it will pay $6 -hour (standard intern rate) with no benefits. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Steven Schwanke as a Planning Intern effective Sept. 3, 1985. • CONTRACTOR LICENSE B. Contractor License --Enclosed on page is a list of contractors .who are renewing or who have b en selected and retained as a builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside in Eagan. They have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor license as presented. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES - August 20, 1985 General Contractor 1. B.B.K. Construction 2. Construction Association 3. Greenwaldt Construction, Inc. 4. Nordaas American Homes 5. RMC Development Corporation 6. Sonnek Construction Co., Inc. Homeowners • 1. Gerald Leimer 2. James R. Mach Heating & Ventilating 1. Fred Plaas Plbg. & Htg. Masonry, Cement Work 1. Graybow-Daniels Company Plumbing • 1. Fignar Plumbing 2. Fred Plaas Plbg. & Htg. 3. Rascher Plbg & Htg. 4. Abrahamson Plumbing Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Five EXCAVATION PERMIT/BRITTANY 9TH ADDN. C. Excavation Permit #EX33-155, Brittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) -- we have received a request from Tollefson Builders to proceed with the excavation and grading necessary for the proposed Brittany 9th Addition incorporating approximately 10 acres. All application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Excavation Permit #EX33-155 (Brittany 9th Addition) to Tollefson Builders, Inc. • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Six PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/BRITTANY 9TH ADDN. D. Project 459, Receive Petition/Authorize a Feasibility Report (Brittany 9th Addition - Streets & Utilities) -- We have received a petition requesting the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed development of the Brittany 9th Addition which is an easterly extention of Sherwood Way into John Brown's property. Both the developer and the property owner have signed the petition and have guaranteed all costs associated with this report if the project is not approved at the time of public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 459 (Brittany 9th Addition - streets and utilities). • FEASIBILITY REPORT (NICOLS ROAD - STREETS) E. Project 460, Authorize Feasibility Report (Nicols Road - Streets) -- Nicols Road, which is currently classified as Dakota County Road #23, is scheduled to be turned back to the City of Eagan in 1986. As a condition of that turnback, the County will be responsible for upgrading this road to current standards for similar County roads. This relates to the County providing a 2" bituminous overlay to the existing roadway. However, due to the fact that the existing base and bituminous surface has lost its structural stability, this bituminous overlay would • not last the length of time necessary to recover this capital expenditure. Due to the increased traffic volume that this street is experiencing, it is anticipated that it will have to be upgraded to City urban standards within the next 1 - 3 years. In order to make use of the County's financial obligation, the Public Works Director is requesting authorization from the City Council to prepare a feasibility report in hopes that the upgrading of Nicols Road could be initiated during 1986 so that the County could participate in the construction cost in an amount equivalent to their bituminous overlay obligation. It is also felt that with the upgrading of Nicols Road, it will alleviate a lot of the traffic volume currently using Rahn Road which should help to extend its remaining days before reconstruction is required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the feasibility report for Project 468 (Nicols Road - streets). 0 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seven FINAL PLAT/WOODHAVEN ADDN. F. Final Plat Approval, Woodhaven Addition (Terry Stover) -- We have received an, application for final plat approval for the Woodhaven Addition which is located on the southeast corner of Beau De Rue Drive and Rahn Road. The proposed final plat as referenced on page /I is in conformance with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on July 16, 1985. All final plat application materials have been executed, submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration for Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat • application for the Woodhaven Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • /O WOODHAAEN EXHIBIT "A" STOMA SURVEYING SERVICES ]iY 6nn Y.imru� n.on •�0 fib', � jl � +.� 9 o ^ a ? 9+=11�00�1O1P \�y 3 p � 1 E I I qpy I 5 Y I Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eight FINAL PLAT/UPS 1ST ADDN G. Final Plat Approval, UPS 1st Addition (United Parcel Service, Inc.) -- We have received an application for the final plat approval of the UPS lst Addition located east of T.H. 149 and north of Becker Road (County Road 63A). The final plat, enclosed on page _�� _ , is in conformance with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on March 19, 1985. All final plat application materials have been executed, submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. While there has been some concerns by various parties pertaining to the required acquisition of ponding easements and street rights-of-way prior to final plat approval, the devel- oper's agreement incorporated this development's • /responsibility as identified by the excerpt contained on page(s)./3 -/(o . • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the UPS 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • EXHIBIT A• U.P.S. 1ST ADDITION fC.LI IN I[Cr TNI [.IR .1N[ .I ,[1r1ex ,!. IOY1rs." a,. RRx4[ I . I..,l...[o ro ..yt . e1....0 01 10•1.st•[. oe.ar[s v2..C. e1 H1.1" ..ox ..... IMF 'IF....Rx 10 CY .[m,n.I.O..0 sou. •--•—• eexmn...... oI .... Is 0[011.1[0 r0 ...m• I...11. HEDLUND ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 EMEETE ` v. Yy.l ,f ` x.11 .0 Ob .q•.ne\i. 1 ayII-Io T>a:.EE .^OJ :E NO A 4e so'.f —gVell '' a N C1TF Is RIP Lor r L: Q• ..'pu'�a•Iw, iY OUTLOT E N .L� 10: i W.. .... IEXCEPTION E.CEPTION \` . } C8E yy 112 SS \\\ y?� GOTLGT. DETAIL .. = :� CG ME. GlaCiNCP�bOAD �•y i EXCEPTION 3 T.r fC.LI IN I[Cr TNI [.IR .1N[ .I ,[1r1ex ,!. IOY1rs." a,. RRx4[ I . I..,l...[o ro ..yt . e1....0 01 10•1.st•[. oe.ar[s v2..C. e1 H1.1" ..ox ..... IMF 'IF....Rx 10 CY .[m,n.I.O..0 sou. •--•—• eexmn...... oI .... Is 0[011.1[0 r0 ...m• I...11. HEDLUND ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 EMEETE ` v. Yy.l ,f ` x.11 .0 Ob .q•.ne\i. 1 ayII-Io A 4e so'.f '' a N C1TF Lor r N BLOCK 1 IEXCEPTION E.CEPTION \` a'a[Sk SS DETAIL .. = :� CG ME. GlaCiNCP�bOAD �•y i EXCEPTION 3 T.r sQ.a4.�___L _Lw la_.n•rv-•��`.TL1.=., a.ETAIM \e 3. \ I•u•, Is www CE IOx .1u ,j (r iey..t 4 i ra7l�u �F fC.LI IN I[Cr TNI [.IR .1N[ .I ,[1r1ex ,!. IOY1rs." a,. RRx4[ I . I..,l...[o ro ..yt . e1....0 01 10•1.st•[. oe.ar[s v2..C. e1 H1.1" ..ox ..... IMF 'IF....Rx 10 CY .[m,n.I.O..0 sou. •--•—• eexmn...... oI .... Is 0[011.1[0 r0 ...m• I...11. HEDLUND ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 EMEETE grading and drainage plan shall include lot and building elevations, drainage awales to be sodded, storm sewer, catch basins;:erosion control structures and ponding areas necessary to conform with the overall City storm sewer plan, and shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to final plat approval. The grading of the site shall be completed in conformance vith'the approved grading, drainage aria erosion control plat prepared by Henningson, Durham and Richardson dated March 22, 1985, and shall be completed by September 10, 1985: In the event that the developer fails to complete the grading of the site in conformance with the approved grading and drainage plan by the stipulated date, the City may declare the Developer in default pursuant to paragraph 8 Is "Default by Developer" herein. The Developer shall provide, in the final plat, five-foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to all common property lines excluding party wall lot lines and ten -foot drainage and utility easements across the front of each lot adjacent to a public right-of-way or adjacent to any lot lines not common to other lots of this addition. Additional utility and drainage easements which may be required by the City shall appear on the final plat or be dedicated by an acceptable document as approved by the City prior to final • plat approval. _. This development shall dedicate on the final lat a (outlot B) p ponding easement,/as approved by the City, incorporating 135.0 acre feet of storage volume for City designated pond GP -5 in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared by Henningson, Durham and Richardson dated March 22, 1985. In addition, the owner and developer shall be responsible for the acquisition of the ponding easements, as approved by the City, incorporating 19.4 acre feet of storage volume for City designated pond GP -9, and the roadway easements necessary for the upgrading of County Road 63A ( Becker �1 5 Road) as required by the final design approved by the City of Eagan and the Dakota County Highway Department. If the aeveloper ana owner cannot provide these required easements or rights-of-way, they may request City assistance. If requested in writing, the City of Eagan shall attempt to acquire said pdnding easement for GP -9 and street easements or rights-of-way for Co. Rd. 63A (Becker Road ) through negotiations with the respective property owners so affected. If these easements and rights-of-way are acquired through a _ negotiated settlement (including a transfer in lieu of condemnation) which is agreeable to the parties 1. involved, the owner ana developer shall be • responsible for the financial obligation so agreed upon by the owner and developer. If the City is unable to acquire said Pond GP -9 and Co. Rd. 63A easements through negotiations, then it shall proceed to acquire these easements and rights-of-way by condemnation. If so acquired, the owner and developer of the UPS 1st addition shall be financially responsible for all costs incurred by the City of Eagan condemnation award, including appraisal costs, engineering, planning and attorney's fees and costs. Such costs shall be spread equally on a per acre basis ana assessed against UPS lst Addition. The owner and developer waive any and all rights to public hearings, notice of hearings and any objections relating to any acquisition costs being spread as special assessments. All acquisition ana/or dedication of required easements and rights-of-way for GP -9. and Co. Rd. 63A shall be completed by the owner and developer ana conveyed to the City by September 15, 1985, after which time the City shall initiate acquisition through condemnation with or without the developer's written request. E. Street Signs. The Developer shall oe financially responsible for the installation of street identification signs and non-mechanical and non - /_15, 6 EXHIBIT A U.P.S. 1ST ADDITION N 1 �[. YE.T1ox • °� • • i Si DETAIL (r•wr.. a5 E.CE.TIOe1••� E.CE ION p`• �� I APPID FOX PROPERTY —? ILA01M4 PWM s•".•.:��'.."... I�,i`,• ,� I� w•na.( Iii BERM a... i .tE7 POND •L •.,r.r�... y1,; as•°4 CiT.4 o.. , ourEor a —Z'--•-J.Ini'.'(inJ.��. 03. Sa"IYV �Y1'•• 1.7. BLOCK 1 i ounor • 1` N 1 �[. YE.T1ox • °� • • i Si DETAIL (r•wr.. a5 E.CE.TIOe1••� E.CE ION .m ..co. I1..�+9y.a.. 1.1 9.91 .I.a 01 IECr,o. ,a. ro.4.V ...O 03. .1 uau.aD ro n.ra . pd....1 o. Co•.4'Ea'E o(..t11 ...,.1. a,..,.(n.80. nu.1.1 w V... go .1 cn n.r... .. wq .—.—. o1..11..r ."M- sm,W,* ro s..ou 1ou.rr of Norge •OCa,C..rao.[Call' 'fX� HEDLUND / ENGiNEERINO " n.r. mew W as•°4 CiT.4 o.. , ,°..+'{I LOT I —Z'--•-J.Ini'.'(inJ.��. 03. Sa"IYV �Y1'•• 1.7. BLOCK 1 i .m ..co. I1..�+9y.a.. 1.1 9.91 .I.a 01 IECr,o. ,a. ro.4.V ...O 03. .1 uau.aD ro n.ra . pd....1 o. Co•.4'Ea'E o(..t11 ...,.1. a,..,.(n.80. nu.1.1 w V... go .1 cn n.r... .. wq .—.—. o1..11..r ."M- sm,W,* ro s..ou 1ou.rr of Norge •OCa,C..rao.[Call' 'fX� HEDLUND / ENGiNEERINO Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nine VACATION/PETITION/PUBLIC HEARING/MEADOWLANDS ADDN. H. Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easements, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Meadowlands Addition) -- We have received a petition requesting the vacation of common lot line drainage and utility easements for Lots 101-104 of Block 1, Meadowland 1st Addition. These four lots are bordered by Rahn Road on the west, Shale Lane on the south and Bear Path Trail on the east. This request is based on the proposed development of the Eagles Nest complex which has received preliminary plat approval on June 18, 1985, by Council action. One of the conditions of that approval was the vacation of these referenced common lot line drainage and utility easements. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and schedule the public hearing to be held on September 17, 1985. • /7 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Ten CONTRACT 84-20, FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PK. I. Contract 84-20, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Cliff Commercial Park - Streets & Utilities -- We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineers along with a certifica- tion of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities to the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park under the above -referenced contract. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department. It is recommended that final payment be issued with City acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fifth and • final payment for Contract 84-20 (Cedar Cliff Commercial Park) for $32,924.76 to Spencer Construction, Inc., and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/MISC. PROJECTS J. Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Miscel- laneous Projects) -- Final costs have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared for the following projects: Project # Location #348 Coachman/Four Oaks Road #371B South Coachman Road • #398 Sun Cliff 2nd Addition #399 Silver Bell Road #400 Oak Cliff Addition #404 Lexington Place South Lexington Place 2nd Addn. #410 Lone Oak Road #411 Birch Park Addition Patrick Eagan Park #415 Cedar Cliff Commercial Pk. Description Streets Streets Streets & Utilities Streets Trunk Storm Sewer Utilities Trunk Storm Sewer Trunk Storm Sewer Streets & Utilities It is recommended that these final assessment rolls be received and that a public hearing be scheduled for September 17, 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assess- ment rolls as listed and order the final assessment hearing to be held on September 17, 1985. Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eleven DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AMENDMENTS/TIME EXTENSIONS/MISC. DEVELOPMENTS K. Development Contract Amendments - Time Extensions for Public Improvements (Miscellaneous Developments) -- Several developments throughout the City have not met the completion dates for the completion of the installation of required public improvements as established in their Development Contract Agreement executed at the time of final plat approval. The following is a listing of those developments identifying their original completion date, the developers requested extension date and the staff's recommendation. The -staff does not recommend that any extension date be approved beyond October 1 to allow adequate time for the City to perform any remaining incompleted work before adverse weather conditions prohibit its completion prior to the end • of the construction season. Development Sunset 4th (84-I) Blackhawk Oaks (84-R) Berkshire Ponds (84-B) Century Addn. (84-N) Developer Agreement Completion Date Tri -Land, Inc. Norse Development Derrick Land Co. Don Klobar Requested Staff's Ext. Date Recommendatio 8-1-84 10-30-85 10-1-85 11-18-84 9-15-85 9-15-85 6-15-85 9-15-85 9-15-85 9-1-84 10-1-85 10-1-85 The Development Contract Agreement requires extensions of completion dates to be amended by Council action. All of these extension dates are necessary for the completion of the bituminous wearing surface. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendments to the respective Development Contract Agreements providing • for an extension of the completion of public improvements as recommended by staff. /17 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twelve NOTICE OF DEFAULT/INTENT TO FILE ON BOND/MISC. DEVELOPMENTS L. Notice of Default/Intent to File on Performance Bond (Century Addition and Crossroads of Eagan) -- The following subdivisions have not completed the installation of public improvements within the time frame agreed to in the Development Contract Agreements executed at the time of final plat approval. Notices were sent to the responsible parties for these developments informing them of their noncompliance requesting their response identifying their recommended course of action. As of this date, the following developments have not responded to our requests providing a revised time schedule for consideration by staff and Council. Subsequently, the staff is recommending that these developments • be found in default of the Development Contract Agreement and that they be given formal notice to complete their improvements by the specified date. This will allow the City to complete the project after that date and file against their financial security which was submitted with the Development Agreement at the time of final plat approval. Development Crossroads of Eagan (84-V) Century Addition Agreement Completion Developer _ Date Dan Gustafson Riverdale Development 8-1-85 9-1-84 Final Date For Default 9-15-85 9-15-85 The incompleted items for these developments relates to the final bituminous surfacing and related restoration. •ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To declare the developers in default of the contract agreements for Crossroads of Eagan and the Century Addition and authorize a filing against the financial security after September 15, 1985. 20 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen CHANGE ORDER #2 FOR PROJECT 85-14 M. Change Order #2 for Project 85-14, Parks Improvement Contract -- The City has received a request for Change Order #2, Project 85-14 for the Parks Improvement Contract which is being handled by Central Landscaping, Inc. This change order provides payment to the contractor for costs incurred for materials and labor not included within the original improvement contract totalling $13,931.15. The change order consists of four (4) subparts which include 1) a change in the sanitary sewer service at a cost of $3,263. 2) Shoreline excavation and clean up as a result of storm water run-off at a cost of $3,420. Rock excavation and installation of a sanitary sewer at Schwanz Lake Park at $690. Finally, the remainder of the change order is a result of additional • work associated with the shaping and reberming of areas within the various parks. The change order also includes bituminous overlay correction for trails at walnut Hill Park as a result of unstable soils. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize Change Order #2 to Project 85-14 (park improvements). • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen VACATION/DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS/SUN CLIFF 5TH ADDN. A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement - Sun Cliff 5th Addition -- On July 16, the Council received a petition requesting the vacation of a common lot line drainage and utility easement located within Lot 14, Block 3, of Sun Cliff 5th Addition as located and described on page y3 This vacation is required due to the relocation of lot lines associated with the Sun Cliff 5th Addition. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to Is this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the drainage and utility easement as described for Lot 14, Block 3, Sun Cliff 5th Addition. Zv C. R. WINDEN 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. SKETCH S DESCRIPTION LAND SURVEYORS Tel 64S•3646 OF: 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. S5104 Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation FOR: Advance Developers, Inc. 4~Di (20 >r /0 A\16' 49\ \ nhl0 n� Scale: 1": 30' Any di-ainage.and utility -easement, located on. Lot-14-;i� Block- 3, Sun C11ff. Fifth Addition, Dakota Countv', t4ihnesota which. does- not- lie!---. within the!Southea"st 10.00,feet,.the'Northwest 10:00 feet, the Northeast•5.00-feet or'-.the,Southwest.5:0a..feet of -said Lot 14. I hereby certify that this survey. plan. or report was prepared by me or under my direct super` vision and that 1 am a duly Re;tistered Land Surveyor un.l, r the laws of the Mate of Blinn• esots. Date 7-//-a5 Rne. -4n, /t.G-7a Survey Drawn_ A- (r. Checked Approvek. Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen IDB FUNDING/KNOB HILL PROFESSIONAL PARK B. Public Hearing to Consider IDB Funding in the Amount of $400,000 for a 7,000 Square Foot Office Building in Knob Hill Professional Park (Richard Nordlund)--A public hearing was set at the July 16, 1985, City Council meeting to consider a request from Richard Nordlund on behalf of Ed Dunn and KHPP Partnership for industrial revenue bond financing in the amount of $400,000 to construct a 7,000 square foot office building. The office building is proposed for Knob Hill Professional Park, Lot 6, • which is located on the northwest side of the Diffley Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection. All land use requirements are satisfied, realizing that proper zoning and platting exist on the property. Enclosed on pages _.25_ through j�is a copy of the application which includes an architect's rendering of the office building as proposed. The City has maintained a $500,000 minimum for consideration of industrial revenue bond financing. Since this request is in the amount of $400,000, it would be necessary for the City Council to waive this requirement. At the time guidelines were drawn, there were concerns that every fast food restaurant may desire industrial revenue financing which the City Council determined not to be a good public use of IDB funding. Also, the City's fiscal consultant advised the community that $500,000 was a rule of thumb for making a project feasible in terms of the expenses that were incurred for industrial revenue financing. • This project meets the 258 rent requirement for renting space to Eagan Realty (Ed Dunn) for their real estate office space. It is expected that approximately 10 new jobs, with an estimated payroll of $250,000, will occupy the space. The Economic Development Commission has recently reviewed various State Economic Development incentive programs and one of the few programs left for the small business is industrial revenue financing which they endorse as a Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the industrial revenue financng in the amount of $400,000 for the KHPP Partnership located at Knob Hill Professional Park, Lot 6, in the amount of $400,000. a�- • lJ CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE FINANCING REVIEW BUSINESS NAME: KHPP Partnership MINIMUM SIZE:$500,000 LOCATION: Knob Hill Professional Park Lot 6 LAND: $ BUSINESS FORM: Partnership BUILDING: $ 300,000 REPRESENTATIVE: Ed Dunn EQUIPMENT: $ PHONE: 452-1561 OTHER: $ 100,000 NATURE OF BUSINESS: Real Estate TOTAL: $ 400,000 Development Date: June 25, 1985 DETAILED COST BREAKDOWN: Land Acquisition and Site Development (Will not be financed by IDB): Construction Contracts Equipment Acquisition & Installation Architectural & Engineering Fees Legal Fees Interest During Construction Initial Bond Reserve Contingencies Bond Discount Other $ 100,000 350.000 10.000 20,000 10.000 5.000 Total with Land $ 500.000 Total without Land $ 400.000 HISTORY OF APPLICANT 1. Have you ever been in bankruptcy? NO 2. Have you ever defaulted on any bond or mortgage commitment? C2$ INFORMATION CONCERNING APPLICANT'S PROPOSED PROJECT 1. PROPOSED LOCATION (ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) Knob Hill Professional Park 2. NEW FACILITY OR EXPANSION? 3. INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL/RETAIL? Commercial office 4. ESTIMATE NUMBER OF NEW JOBS 10 ESTIMATED PAYROLL 250,000 • 5. IS THIS SITE PROPERTY ZONED & ARE UTILITIES AVAILABLE? 6. ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL SALES Office rents 66,000 7. POTENTIAL OTHER USES OF FACILITY This will be office space that ,nuld fit any -small office user 8. WILL THERE BE MORE THAN ONE PHASE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT? • 9. EXPLAIN HOW THIS FACILITY WILL NOT COMPETE WITH OTHER LOCAL COMPANIES This office will be the new office for Eagen Realty plus some additional rental space 10. WHAT WILL FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS BE; WILL THE FACILITY BE A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP? KHPP Partnership is an existing partnership that owns the underlying land. Date: 6/25/85Signed: (Title): MY 0 • �4 3. Have you applied for conventional financing? Yes, but the lenders want floating rate which would be much higher costs. 4. What are your future plans? To continue to develop the remaining sites. 5. List financial references: a. Dick Stevenson b. Richard J. Nordlund 6. When will the construction period begin? Start: 8/15/85 Finish: 12/01/85 • 7. Other comments: • �4 0 ro 0 z 0 a 0 Ir r r z 0 0 0 0 P I L 0 T K N 0 B I R 0 A 0 V.%Ftm M 0 0 In FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN -- P11CM."13I_I>t' 01=11=ICIE 131_17(;. IS\1t)13 Ii 11_I_ lml:t"1=13SS 140 pial_ IMiOlkRIS • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/WERNER LEMBKE C. Public Hearing for Renewal of Conditional Use Permit/Werner Lembke, Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke 1st Addition --A public hearing is scheduled to allow Mr. Werner Lembke an opportunity to discuss his compliance with a conditional use permit that was denied renewal at the July 16, 1985, City Council meeting. It was the opinion of the City Attorney that a formal public hearing be held giving Mr. Lembke an opportunity to address the City Council prior to any final decision regarding the renewal of his condi- tional use permit. Mr. Gordon C. Moosbrugger was retained by Mr. Lembke and has contacted the City staff on numerous occasions to review the files regarding this matter. For additional informa- tion on the Conditional Use Permit renewal, refer to a letter that was prepareq by the City Attorney's office enclosed on pages throughstatus and a copy of a report from the City Planner updating the of the Conditional Use Permit found on page J6. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny renewal of the conditional use permit for Werner Lembke. 31 PAUL H. HAUOE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE RALPH W. COREY Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 HAIIGE, SmiTH & EIDE, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 63122 July 24, 1985 • Re: Werner Lembke — Conditional Use Permit Renewal Dear Tom: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 404.4224 This letter is in response to a situation which now exists following the City Council action on July 16, 1985 regarding the renewal of Mr. Lembke's conditional use permit. The following is a brief history of the Lembke situation: July, 1980 — conditional use permit issued to Mr. Lembke regarding outside storage. April 19, 1983 — Development Contract entered into regarding Lembke First Addition which outlines 11 conditions to be met by Mr. Lembke. • April 2, 1985 — Following a series of complaints from neighboring landowners, the Eagan City Council directed the enforcement of the conditional use permit issued to Mr. Lembke and he was notified of the provisions of which he was in violation. June 4, 1985 — A letter was sent to Mr. Lembke notifying him that he was not in compliance with his conditional use permit and that a review of that permit was scheduled for the City Council on June 18, 1985. The letter also noted that should he not be able to comply, his conditional use permit would be revoked. June 18, 1985 — Mr. Lembke appeared at the Council meeting and stated it would take approximately two months to comply with the requirements of his conditional use permit. The Council voted to continue consideration of the proposed cancellation of the conditional use permit until the July 16, 1985, meeting. July 16, 1985 — Mr. Lembke did not appear at this meeting and based upon his failure to be in compliance with the conditions of his conditional use permit the Council voted not to renew Mr. Lembke's conditional use permit. Mr. Thomas L. Hedges July 24, 1985 Page 2 Eagan City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 4E provides that a violation of any condition of a conditional use permit is a violation of the Code and automatically terminates the conditional use permit. Although this does not require a hearing to be held prior to revocation of the permit, the fact that Mr. Lembke was provided notice of both the June 18 and July 16 meetings at which the conditional use permit was discussed would presumably overcome any challenge that Mr. Lemke did not have notice that the renewal of his conditional use permit was under review. This issue of formal notice, however, could be an objection in a formal legal action. Enforcement • At this time several options exist for the City regarding enforcement of their action on July 16. 1. Criminal Prosecution. According to the City Code noncompliance with the terms of the conditional use permit is a misdemeanor offense and could subject the person to criminal penalties. A prosecution of this type was attempted by the City of Bloomington in State v. Larson Transfer, 246 N.W.2d 176 (1974) with little success. The Minnesota Supreme Court held that noncompliance with a conditional use permit is more analagous to a breach of a contract rather than a criminal offense and that criminal prosecution under the Bloomington Ordinance in that case was not allowed. It should be noted that the Eagan City Code clearly authorizes criminal sanctions while Bloomington ordinance did not. Should Mr. Lembke continue operations without a permit, criminal prosecution could also result from that activity. • 2. Injunctive Relief. A. The City could move for either a temporary restraining order or a temporary injunction to prohibit Mr. Lembke from operating his business without compliance with the City's conditions. In order to obtain a temporary injunction the City would need to show the following: 1. The probability of success on the merits of the case; 2. Immediate and irreparable injury to the City if a temporary injunction is denied; 3. The liklihood that no permanent injury would result to the Defendant by granting a temporary injunction; 4. The public interest in granting the temporary injunction. 33 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges July 24, 1985 Page 3 B. Another option is a mandatory temporary injunction. This would command Mr. Lembke to do an affirmative act such as comply with the conditions of the conditional use permit. These are generally granted only in cases of extreme emergency and where it is certain that .--conditions could be imposed to safeguard the Defendant. It is unlikely that a case of extreme emergency could be made by the City and the best course would be to request an injunction to prohibit further operation until Mr. Lembke was in compliance with the conditions. A motion for temporary injunction is initiated by a • request to the Court in the form of a Notice of Motion and Motion and service upon the Defendant of that notice. 3. The City could again contact Mr. Lembke and attempt to work out a suitable timetable for compliance with the City's conditions. Given Mr. Lembke's reluctance in the past to comply, however, this may not be effective. It is our understanding that a Certificate of Deposit was posted with the City in the amount of $2,000.00 to guarantee landscaping. It would appear that this C.D. has been forfeited but mailed notice of forfeiture should be sent to Mr. Lembke. A decision as to whether notice and a new hearing should be scheduled and should be made shortly. V y tr ly yours, • HAUGE SMITH b ;IDS, P.A. PHH:ras '5� MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: AUGUST 15, 1985 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON WERNER LEMBKE -.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT On August 14, 1985, I met with Mr. Gordon Moosbrugger, the attorney representing Mr. Werner Lembke. In this meeting we reviewed the conditions of the conditional use permit and also the memorandum dated .July 10, 1985. This memo was the memo submitted to the City Council on the conditions which had not been complied with. After this meeting we viewed the site as to the status of the conditions- of- the conditional use permit—and- as to what - had been-- - — complied with. While Mr. Lembke has done a considerable amount of work to clean up the site, the conditions existing as of the July 10, 1985 memo are pretty much in tact, that is a clean up has been done but no capital improvement has been completed as • of this date. The applicant has an understanding as to what is expected of him and his attorney has indicated that 1) the 'conditions will be contractually agreed to if the conditional use permit is extended or 2) would like to discuss the options regarding these conditions and the status of the permit with the City Council on August 20, 1985. +,C� City Planner DCR/kf �J • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen UPS BUILDING PERMIT A. UPS Building Permit -- On July 16, the City Council reviewed a request from Mr. Paul Addison, representing UPS, requesting the issuance of a building permit for their facility prior to the final plat approval process. After extended discussion, the Council authorized the issuance of a building permit for 30 days (to August 15) to allow them to complete their final plat application process. As previously discussed under the Consent Agenda, they have satisfactorily complied with the final plat application process in submitting all required materials and documents within the required time frame. If the Council wishes to allow the progression of the construction of this facility, it should take specific action regarding authorization to issue a building permit prior to the recording of the final plat documents at Dakota County. Special Note: The City had not received all of the final plat documents by closing hours on August 15. Therefore, a letter was sent by the City Administrator to the UPS project manager stating the temporary building permit could no longer be honored. A copy of that letter is enclosed on page -,,3�. The Development Agreement was received early Friday morning along will all other documents and did satisfy all of the City's requirements. Therefore, the temporary building permit was reinstated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the issuance of a building permit for the UPS facility within the UPS 1st Addition prior to the recording of the final plat at Dakota County. J6 of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. RO- BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 August 15, 1985 MR PAUL MARKHAM, PROJ MGR UPS 555 BECKER ROAD EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Building Permit for United Parcel Service Dear Mr. Markhum: BEA SLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Ca Mfl Members THOMAS HEDGES City Aammi aior EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE GN Clerk In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on July 16, 1985, there was a motion passed that granted a temporary building permit for a 30 -day period and if the final plat was not completed and submitted with the accompaning requirements to the staff's satisfaction, then the building construction would cease; further, all necessary require- ments would be submitted to the City by August 15, 1985, for final approval by the City Council at its August 20, 1985, meeting. To date, our Director of Public Works has not received all the necessary documents and I am sorry to impose any delay, however, as of Friday, August 16, 1985, the City cannot honor the temporary building permit that was approved by our City Council. If all the documents are received to the satisfaction of our Director of Public Works, the City's Building Inspection Department has been instructed to honor the temporary building permit until final plat and building permit are considered at the August 20, 1985, meeting.' - If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Mr. Tom `Colbert, our Director of Public Works, or Doug Reid, Assistant Building Inspector. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Doug Reid, Assistant Building Inspector TLH/kf THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 31 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen IDB ENTITLEMENT FUNDING B. IDB Entitlement Funding --At the last regular City Council meeting, a status report was given regarding industrial development revenue bond entitlement funding for the City of Eagan. The City of Eagan's entitlement for 1985 is $10,012,399. To date, the only application for IDB funding is the Dick Nordlund applica- tion in the amount of $900,000. This leave a balance of $9,612,399 available to the City of Eagan. Since the last City Council meeting, City Hall was contacted regarding a potential development that may request $1,200,000, however, the development is quite sketchy at this time. They were told that a 1% application fee would be required in order to guarantee the IDB funding. • Cities that have expressed interest for IDB money were contacted by the Administrator's office. A status report on those cities contacted is as follows: Blaine Possibly $1.1 million and will know by August 22. Would be prepared to process the necessary resolutions. Crystal No longer requires the funding. Mound No longer requires the funding. Savage Will know by August 20 whether they could use approximately $2 million and would also process all the necessary resolutions. • Brooklyn Center Could use approximately $2.5 million and would process the paperwork. Maple Grove Is in need of approximately $2.7 million to fund a project in their community. Ironically enough, the City of Brooklyn Center had given part of their allocation to another community earlier this summer and now has discovered a need for the funding. Regarding the City of Eagan's options for committing a portion of the IDB funding for future use beyond September 1, there are specific rules that do apply. The City would be required to submit a letter of intent with a 1% deposit no later than August 31, 1985, to the Department of Energy and Economic Development. The City will receive a full 1% refund by October 31 if there are no requests for funding by that date. Interest is not a reimburs- able amount by the State. If the City decided to continue the 13 deposit with the State after October 31, we would lose 2/3 UL Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen of the deposit on amounts not used by December 20, 1985. In summary, the alternatives are as follows: 1) turn back the entire entitlement to the State of Minnesota to be used in the State-wide pool; 2) Submit a 1% deposit and retain a portion or all of the IDB funding for the City of Eagan for a specified period of time or 3) allocate the remaining IDB funding to the aforementioned cities with the remainder going to the State-wide pool or through a 1% deposit by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt one of the twelve alternatives as presented by the City Administrator. • • 37 • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL A. Conditional Use Permit for the Community Action Council to Allow a Shelter for Battered Women --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider a conditional use permit for the Community Action Council to allow a shelter for battered women. The APC is recommending approval of the condi- tional use permit. For additional information on this item, refer to the Cit Planner's report, a copy is enclosed on pages / through . For a copy of the APC action, refer to those minutes found on page(s)q�_ �Zfip,. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: tional use permit to allow a shelter ted by the Community Action Council. S To approve or deny a condi- for battered women as reques- V1, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL APPLICANT: FRANK BRENNAN LOCATION: SE's OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CEDAR RIDGE IST ADD SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: LB (LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • APPLICATION SUBMITTED:. An application has been submitted requesting to relocate the Community Action Council's shelter for battered women. This relocation would be on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, Section 30. COMMENTS: The Comm. Action Council's shelter has been in existence in Eagan for 6 years.. It is the City's understanding that they would like to increase the size of their facility in order to better serve the residents of Dakota County. In 1984, through the Community Development Block Grant process the Comm. Action Council submitted a request to relocate the shelter and was allocat- ed approx. $225,000.00 from the Cities of Burnsville, Apple valley & Eagan. The City has committed itself to the program for this relocation and funding. At the time the Comm. Dev. Block Grant was submitted, there was not an exact location for reloction. • The applicants have now submitted a new site plan and the specifics on location, design and budget as to where this new facility is proposed to be located. The property is presently zoned LB (limited business) where there is a dental clinic on the south and existing homestead on the north. The only residents are located east along Nicols Rd. The facility appears to be in a location which would not impact a residential area. As stated before, this is a relocation of a facility that has been located in Eagan for 6 years in a residential neighborhood. . However, since the expansion and upgrading will handle more people, it was felt that this location would be suitable for the shelter. The proposed building will contain a gross of 5,485 S.F. This would breakdown as 3,697 for residential living, or for the battered women quarters, and 1,846 for administration and office space for running the program. Therefore, total square footage of 5,400, or basically the size of a small office facility. , Since the time the funding was approved, the Comm. Action Council has put together a detailed budget and square footage cost which has to be approved by the City Council prior to receiving any funds for this project. The applicants will be submitting a budget for the shelter and cost analysis for the council to review and 1/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2. approve. If the Commission would like detailed information on this facility or costs, the Comm. Action Council staff will go through the numbers and make this info available to you. If approved this facility should be subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted & approved prior to occupancy of the facility. 2. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. • • 4y / I/ 1 I M I NN. DEPT. OF TR iI w l A SPORTATION :RIGHT OF i AY PLAT; ' N0. 19- 'u !� 7 os `------------------ q0 --••••••.... --- . w ------------ 1 °------- k W NSe: m 3i C 0 ;,; XJ - �----- - - - (CDUNTY STATE' AID HIGHWAY N23I) TIIPP --� ROAD COL 0. i s i. ��; 0 6 6 . C f D C .I a .• �� sett/ tee— a DIAMOND � Y - 7 . - ^�' r[®[• � r" . yPG d_'1, 1 .i3 --•r I - -I• : i G nw M1"y ? r. 'LD� G •°r •/ a j �a"�•,/f�'� O/�b1 ° 'Of ~ s a_.e rn�tiOp`i•E. t'QL � _- -s C/ D' n3 t � � r 771 m Z �l It UTI. AREA . JIL.31 • in - 12.196 JS sq. FT. OR 1.66 ACRE BUILDING COVERAGE - 4.512 $0. FT. OR 62 OF SITE. WALKS. PARKING & DRIVES • 44.012 SQ. FT. OR 629 Of SITE. LANDSCAPING • 22.940.75 SQ. FT. OR 322 Of SITE. PARKING PROVIDED I ES SIA6L • I AAMDICXP • 29 SPACES V. V;E LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (03"locre) R -ll mixed residenllalO&ITUMM) R-111 mixed residenti0161MNlsr14 R -N multiple (•12vIIVocre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial RBD researrhMevelopment COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping tenter RSC regional shopping Center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks, quasi public E.M,15,5chools FEB. 1981 CITY OF EAGAN t. C43 • • s COMMERCIAL •,i •`;:r: i e. •.. '�-:. Ind:. '� •. PLANJED DEVE T �d - -l•^•% , •' .. &' ...� .. RI:. II y Ind •' 1.._ . 1 ir. •t�: �ri._ d li I LU ... RII' ' Intl '" I,I • T - - e - I RN rl, ..' n I I. P•C Ha E Intl •' r, /� •` ..... — , R6D 1 RN r. I RAI _ Ind, Na Fill'.: l� R.11 RAI._ �1 LB Rn Re F ' is I .:... .':.nr. i :7i.'Ef RA 'Tr R11 r.:.. Ind } .. . .' J RIII•;'.,6, LR -1 ' •• R-1 - 1 ' Ina -� ` LI_... -:.,, irUj �I R -I R -Y ;( � R-1 N ' y CSC . `P ""-"•'� I RG'( ��tA:M+'. r -/. tE .. .. - 'RI:,, IO';, ' R -II + a -II R -II M - E '• -� 1 " 1 LB E '�G', •/ M' II. II) RAII RB RIII ;; 'iL[� X11! ;... � i R.t :_.. .. RIIIR-al 9iiRi�CSCIGB RA ...RI "f .) RAI. A -Il RII •TP, .H':�..:,:•.' ); .. { ry •.. �� 1 • ^�I r l7J 'n�: _RI •.qL , '. IRI �\71' �� ,nI R-1 �' -�i CSC Iv LB III LB • R. \� yq LB / -• D LB r '. .. R, I, P 1 e I l��l ,1 �-p�V� i- \.• ul l� dV1 �. R -I R-1 Pi I) R -II .!i;1� .. ._' RA R'll - 11 R41 0� 1. 'HOr.EMOUNT CPPLE J vPLLEY LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (03"locre) R -ll mixed residenllalO&ITUMM) R-111 mixed residenti0161MNlsr14 R -N multiple (•12vIIVocre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial RBD researrhMevelopment COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping tenter RSC regional shopping Center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks, quasi public E.M,15,5chools FEB. 1981 CITY OF EAGAN APC Minutes July 23, 1985 1. A detailed landscape plan including screening or buffering shall be submitted when the detailed site plan of'the church has been submitted for review and shall be approved by City staff prior to final plat approval. 2. The plat shall be reviewed and approved by the Eagan Park Commission in regard to access to the City park, prior to final plat approval. 3. The developer shall meet all standard plat conditions for this development. 4. A 60 -foot right-of-way shall be dedicatgd for public streets. 5. This development shall petition the City for the installation of the necessary trunk storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -29. Also, the overflow outlet to Pond AP -11 must also be under construction prior to final plat approval. • 6. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area watermain and trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in affect at the time of final platting. 7. Because this development lies within two different water pressure zones, there shall be no connections between these pressure zones. B. With the exception of trunk storm sewer outlet construction, all costs for all other street and utility constructions shall be the sole responsibility of this aevelopmenc. Hall noted that the developer would have to pay for the installation of Rahn Roaa adjacent to the development or split the cost with the owner of the property to the east. Voting in favor of the motion were McCrea, Wold, Trygg and Hall; voting against the motion were Wilkins and Harrison. The motion • passed. Wilkins stated that she voted against the motion because the developer does not have a firm commitment from the church to build on the property and because of her concern about the effect on the duplex lot on the south, if the property goes completely commercial on the north. Harrison stated that he voted no because there is no firm commitment from the church to build on the property. COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - WOMEN'S SHELTER Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Community Action Council for conditional use permit to allow a shelter for battered women on the south half of Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Ridge lat Addition in the northwest quarter of Section 30. Dale Runkle explained the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. Mary Ajax appeared for Lewis House, the battered women's shelter and explained that the shelter has been located in Eagan since 1979 and is now planning to relocate to a larger building. The architect, Robert Burroughs, described the application and mentioned that there would be a tot lot play area, as well as a hard top play area, that the parking area would be looped with two access points off Nicols Road, that there will be approximately 5% building coverage, and 50% to 55Z y/7f t. a;�'a`• ;: tib' Y /$ APC Minutes July 23, 1985 green space. In response to questions from the public, Chairman Hall stated that the application was for a permanent building. Mary Ajax explained that the funding will be provided partly from a block grant, partly from a private foundation, and partly from the proceeds of sale of the current shelter, and that operating expenses are provided by the.State of Minnesota, Dakota County, the United Way, dna foundations. She stated that most of the women using the shelter are from Dakota County, and that a total of 30 women and children could occupy the new building. In response to questions from members of the commission, Dale Runkle stated that based upon the past history of the facility, the parking should be adequate, and if more is necessary, he is sere the shelter would add them. Mary Ajax stated that the current shelter has 8 parking spaces which are not adequate, that currently 15 people can stay at the shelter and there are up to 10 staff people at the facility at any given time. Burroughs stated that if necessary, additional parking could be added to the rear of the building. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • application of Community Action Council for a conditional use permit to allow a shelter for battered women on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed lanascape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff prior to occupancy of the facility. 2. All other city ordinances shall be adhered to. All voted in favor. FLOUR BIN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Rey Anderson, Jr. and Flour Bin In ernat. 1 for a condr}t�i5na1 use permit to • allow a pylon sign located n Lot 1, Block 1, F 'r Bin Addition, in the northeast quarter of Section 31. Dale Runkle exp ed the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. stated that the sign would be located as far to the west a possible nd that if an additional sign is installed at'Ehe east end of the dditio it would be very close to the 300 foot distance required by City ode. The applicant, Rey Anderson, Jr., appeared and stated that survey ow that there would be 300 feet from the proposed sign to the location of aand he stated that hexuossible sign on the east part of the addition, ld guarantee that there is sufficient room for the installation of a 4kgn on the east side of the addition. There were no comments from the publv McCrea moved, Harp6son seconded \the motion to recommend approval of the application of Ray �tnderson, Jr. andr Bin International for a conditional use permit for /pylon sign to bated at the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The square footage of the sshall not exceed the footage shown on Exhibit "A" of just over 80 square fee]({t/` of sign area. ....... Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/FLOUR BIN ADDITION - B. Conditional Use Permit for Flour Bin Addition for a Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign by the Flour Bin International Restaurant Corportion. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. The applicant assured the Planning Commission that 300 feet of spacing is available between the sign under consider- ation and a proposed sign for the future. For additional informa- tion on this item, refer to the ty Planner's report, a copy • is enclosed on pages through. For action that was taken by the Advisory -Planning Commission, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)�.5. is ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit to allow a pylon sign for Flour Bin Addition. �117 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN FLOUR BIN INTERNATIONAL APPLICANT: REY ANDERSON, JR., FLOUR BIN INT'L LOCATION: LOT 1, BLK 1, NEe of SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: N.B. (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign for Flour Bin International Restaurant located on Lot 1, Blk 1, Flour Bin Int'l First Addition, NE; of Sec 31. COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign. . The sign is proposed to contain just over 80 S.F. of signage and would be no more than 24' above ground level. The proposed sign meets the criteria for pylon signs in accordance with the City Code for height and square footage. The major concern is the location of the sign for Flour Bin and as to the proposed location of a sign for the second lot. The applicants have taken into account the City of Eagan's ordinance regarding distance between the pylon signs. The second pylon sign will be based upon being able to meet the 300' distance from this proposed sign in the future. • If the Conditional Use Permit is approved it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The square footage of the sign shall not exceed the footage shown on Exhibit A just over 80 S.F. of sign area. 2. Only the pylon sign for Flour Bin is approved with this Condi- tional Use Permit. 3. All other setback requirements and ordinances shall be adhered to. '5O Z.v �N RC1/Di! �e ask /�} fes" �✓ I �� LL W ' I I I I cu II I E z is. i i i i hvcx¢a SECTION, rli 9 i -! _•.. '. i 1. 11 .rl •ie'el^ :swl I :e. i I I it wYt.O`R ' I II I - I I I IS .. 1 •. IlOM 11°•MNnW10 MCII H .I I I a I I FLOUR OIR 6y� lei I,I I I .m.'~ Qg�N� Jill is! I•_ rll H.mr.s rye —w• I �. Id R•J _ • 1/ 1 flTW IwL�wN1 , ----------------------------------- NICOL/ ROAD I _' ( COUNTY ROAD !° ------_--------------- :x.1 n / .srn N.u..1r_wr I I r I .� 1 %-�• ULVIMQ • I II; .. ! I o =%j r.o ,- IF IN, 155 FILE w � I wn�ulrw��wNnwa wnNwf rL I . B s •. ,COMMERCIAL PLM•PIED DEVELOPAENT ,n .r !., r •I�r..., . RI'.' S I nd Intl -i LE FL R a II P t 1 Ind ,... , 11 - 41 w ,•„// ! H l 1{n �/ d I DB 0117 RN . P'•' R4'.; RR&D R -III 'r it I N 1 � I P .... I" M t i I Ind F NO LR RII RI ,; -Il R -III L© DI� CSC. •d/ Ind R -II R4P C�i7LF RII u IBI ! ' r .RII RII P In > R'1 ERif R4 � I RI r i - 'R lV " • �' a ® I i R11 �.. Rz R .� 11 R 1 \'/,1' I!s�li`�) `�-�-• ' - . R -II E .T� R.1 _�'.P : .I/ r.., '. �. . '.� •. R -I: y !) ,-. R -L -11 M NB RB RIII FI1 R -III R' Rif ai 1 I RI I`, RDI CSClGBI 1!- I /1 P P Rn. a E R.II iA y'i:`:a �: -.t .'.:: J`, ® .II :.,.✓�...{I _. _ R -II r. R -II NO .RI. RI P RIIT'r�i'(-',n i41�1 LI y •R 1`ir W LB ' R -I P '.tl /J ,i�p�l.___, P R'I R -I R -II P R-11 ,Pit RJ RII Tl R-11 !q v P I I 3`• 'iR-II LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (OJualapre) R-11 mixed residenllalOf"d1ocre) R -III mixed residential 612us1lucre) R- IV multiple (•12uuUacnd INDUSTRIAL Intl. Industrial R&D researth8deVelOprnent COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB Mighborhood business GB general business CSC Community shopping cMImM RSC regional shopping coer RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks.Wasl public E,M,NS.schools FEB. 198 CITY OF EAGAN I AMIE VALLEYIL % 1 •.. lr. ) (� rr A �. J', � s'a �'� .� ::i•�1,:�._ :j'r. �rArxi,�.i4:ga- -•�i :- APC Minutes July 23, 1985 green space. In response to questions from the public, Chairman Hall stated that the application was for -a permanent building. Mary Ajax explained that the funding will be provided partly from a block grant, partly from a private foundation, and partly from the proceeds of sale of the current shelter, and that operating expenses are provided by the•State of Minnesota, Dakota County, the United Way, and foundations. She stated that most of the women using the shelter are from Dakota County, and that a total of 30 women .and children could occupy the new building. In response to questions from members of the commission, Dale Runkle stated that based upon the past history of the facility, the parking should be adequate, and if more is necessary, he is sµre the shelter would add them. Mary Ajax stated that the current shelter has 8 parking spaces which are not ---- adequate, that currently 15 people can stay at the shelter and there are up to 10 staff people at the facility at any given time. Burroughs stated that if necessary, additional parking could be added to the rear of the building. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • application of Community Action Council for a conditional use permit to allow a shelter for battered women on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff prior to occupancy of the facility. 2. All other city ordinances shall be adhered to. All voted in favor. FLOUR BIN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Rey Anderson, Jr. and Flour Bin International for a conditional use permit to • allow a pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Flour Bin Addition, in the northeast quarter of Section 31. Dale Runkle explained the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. He stated that the sign would be located as far to the west as possible, and that if an additional sign is installed at"Ehe east end of the addition, it would be very close to the 300 foot distance required by City Code. The applicant, Rey Anderson, Jr., appeared and stated that surveys show that there would be 300 feet from the proposed sign to the location of a possible sign on the east part of the addition, and he stated that he would guarantee that there is sufficient room for the installation of a sign on the east side of the addition. There were no comments from the public. McCrea moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of Ray Anderson, Jr. and Flour Bin International for a conditional use permit for pylon sign to be located at the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The square footage of the sign shall not exceed the footage shown on Exhibit "A" of just over 80 square feet of sign area. - . _ t N]a:f_ryn:j4'i 3 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 2. Only the pylon sign for Flour Bin is approved with this conditional use permit. 3. All other setback requirements and ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. Ray Anderson, Jr. shall personally guarantee that there is 300 feet between the sign and the possible sign to the east in the same plat. All members voted in favor. RAX RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public heari on the application of Rax Restaurant for a co nditi al use permit to relocate a pylon sign in Lot 2 • Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addit o 19. Dale Runkle introduces h July 18, 1985. He stated the property owners which all closer to the new boundary li no comments from the public. Runkle stated that no pr neighboring signs, but that he commission expressed their con 200 feet wide which could re sign. McCrea moved, Harrison the August 27, 1985 meeting to the Perkins sign, and to f does. All members voted in fa • 114.103A n in part of t northeast quarter of Section e applicatio and reviewed the staff report of hat Outlot A ad been vacated and turned back to wed them to move the pylon sign to the west, e. The aQ licant was not present and there were In re��??onse to questions from the commission, lem u{as anticipated with distance between ould //not say for sure. Members of the c n at according to the sketch, the lots are su t in the sign being too close to an adjoining se naed the motion to continue the hearing to a ow the staff to investigate the Location of i d out where Perkins might move its sign, if it - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convenethe public hearing on the application of Roy Spande for preliminary plat ap If yroval of parade 7th Addition containing 4 single family lots on 3.4 acr'in part of Government Lot 7 in part of the southwest quarter of Section 4.ale Runkle i troduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July , 1985. The plicant appeared and stated that his son was also present, th t the intention s for his son to occupy Lots 1 and 2, and for Lots 3 and to be sold, tha Lot 2 might be sold in the future, but he had no co/ncern easemen a, but he did have questions concerning the assessments. hairman Hall noted that assessment questions would be addressed by the ssessment Committee nd the City Council, rather than the Planning Commi sion. There were que tions from the public concerning storm drainage in th area and it was mention e that Mr. Post had installed a- drain file in thea a. Rich Hefti stated t at he was unaware of the drain tile, but that i could be provided that 6be developer would be responsible for keeping the brain tile in place, or providing an alternative tile if it is disturbed. !He mentioned that there iso a 24 -inch culvert which had been installed by the City, which will be included in an easement to be provided by the developer, and that ultimately,'it will be replaced with a concrete storm sewer which will go all the way down to Highway #13.. The applicant stated .,. . ............:r.:.._.. ..>�f'q'..;:r-.fir., 4 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two PRELIMINARY PLAT/SPANDE 7TH ADDITION C. Preliminary Plat for Spande 7th Addition Containing 4 Single - Family Lots on 3.4 Acres --An application was presented by Roy Spande requesting a preliminary plat approval of Spande 7th Addi- tion which would consist of approximately 3.4 acres and contain four single-family lots. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval to the City Council. For additional informa- tion on "this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Depart- ments' report found on pages,3-g' through 6(, For a copy of the action that was taken by the Advisory P nning Commission, refer to those minutes found on page(s) • The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Spande 7th Addition and made a recommendation that this preliminary plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Spande 7th Addition. • _57 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPANDE 7TH ADDITION APPLICANT: ROY SPANDE LOCATION: PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7, SWs OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING Depts • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the Spande 7th Addition which would consist of approx. 3.4 acres and contain 4 single family lots in the part of the SW;, Section 4, lying south of Highview Av. & east of T.H. #13. COMMENTS: Presently there exists an old.farm house which contains approx. 3.4 acres. The applicant has indicated he would like to rehabilitate the existing structure and break off between 2 and 3 additional lots in order to help his son offset some of the costs of this development proposal. The existing farm structure would be rehabilitated and owned by the son of the applicant and potentially lots 3 & 4 would be sold off to pay for this development. In review of this proposal, Highview Av is blacktopped with bitu- minous curb, also Bridgeview Terrace is surfaced but onlywith bituminous curb. The streets have a surface width that are not upgraded to the standards for a new subdivision. The one issue that was brought out at the Staff meeting is how much should be required of this subdivision to upgrade the streets to the present City standards. In review of this plat, the four (4) lots on the 3.4 acres are of substantial size and meet or exceed the adjacent lots in the surrounding area. This plat should compliment the lot sizes which border on Highveiw Av and the eastside of Bridgeview Terrace. It appears that there are existing homes in the area and also some infiltration of new construction on these larger lots. Therefore, the remodeling of the existing farm and the creation of the two new lots should not distract from the general aesthetics of the neighborhood. It appears that the Engineering Dept. has more concerns as to which area should be serviced with sanitary sewer and what streets should be upgraded with the approval of the subdivision. PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPANDE 7TH ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: Even though .the existing topography is quite rugged, this site requires very little grading because of,develop- ment into four large single family lots. Drainage over this site is westerly. Two large ravines meet near Highway 13 and characterize the drainage pattern for this site. The northerly ravine (paralleling the existing driveway) conveys storm water from a temporary 24 inch CMB culvert. This culvert collects storm water from Bridgeview Terrace. This development will not require the construction of any additional storm sewer facilities at this time. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer exists within Bridgeview Terrace • and also within Highview Avenue. This line consists of a 9" vitrified clay pipe (VCP). The sanitary sewer located within Bridgeview Terrace will serve the following basement elevations: Lot 2 785 Lot 3 785 Lot 4 787 The sanitary sewer in, Highview Avenue is deep enough to easily service Lot 1. The Staff recommends the installation of the sanitary sewer services to each lot as a condition of final plat approval for this develop- ment. WATERMAIN: An 8" diameter water line located within Bridgeview Terrace will be able to provide service to this development. • Staff also recommends installation of the water services along with the sanitary sewer services to each lot proposed within this development. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Currently the right-of-way for Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue consists of Highway Easement Document 290235. Staff recommends that this development dedicate a 30' half right-of-way for both Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue on the final plat rather then maintain the street right-of-way as a highway easement. Staff recommends dedication of a drainage and utility easement along the southerly boundary of the proposed development to provide for a proposed trunk storm sewer line servicing the Highview Park and Highview Acres area. Figure 1 depicts the portion of . the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan that applies to this proposed development. Staff recommends a minimum width of 30' for this easement. Staff does not anticipate any further additional S9 PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPANDE 7TH ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 easements other than the easements required by code. STREETS: Existing streets bordering this development consist of Bridgeview Terrace on the east and Highview Avenue on the north. Classification of these streets are residential, however, the construction of these streets is not in conformance with City requirements for residential streets. Specifically, these streets do not have concrete curb and gutter and it is questionable whether they were built to the adequate street section for resi- dential streets. Also, these streets are quite old and will need reconstruction in the near future. Therefore, in accordance with City policy, the cost for concrete curb and gutter installation and street overlay are to be assessed to benefitted property. • Staff recommends prepayment of these street assessments in order to reduce possible future assessment administration and possible future disagreements. The assessment portion of this report will cover this item as to estimated cost of the street assessments. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the assessment records, Staff found that the only outstanding assessment, not levied was for trunk area storm sewer. Therefore, this development will be responsible for the trunk area storm sewer assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. Using 1985 rates, this amounts to $6,690.00 (139,382 sq. ft. x $0.048/sq. ft.). In addition Staff recommends this development prepay its future street reconstruction assessment. Staff estimates this to be $16.50/front ft. Staff estimates the assessable front footage to be 870. This amounts to an estimated street reconstruction • assessment of $14,355.00. Both the above assessments can be paid at the time of final platting or spread over 15 years at an assessment rate determined by the latest bond. sale. ME CONDITIONS: Spande 7th Addition 1. People purchasing lots 2, 3 & 4 should be made aware of air traffic noise and that proper insulation should be required in the construction of the new dwellings. 2. The plat should be subject to the Park Commission's review and comment for park dedication. 3. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 4. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be construct into each lot. 5 M 7. L A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated on the final plat for both Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Ave. A 30' drainage utility easement along the southerly boundary • of the proposed development shall be dedicated to provide for a future trunk storm sewer line. This development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer and street reconstruction assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. All applicable standard engineering conditions should be adhered to. • � I i ZT o J o�0 5 — 301.99 Rar 3CI 5 MFS. N 89°59 50"E Z. r IV a ` ri -c T I y v h.r /) LU /996o r 5F IQ j �Im ,'oro -- < - h 214. Z5 N 6`1°45 52" W / oP ;f XICORT',k LJWC °� PCX5T AOL)IT1ON AO. TWO (YeC MJNUMFNTAT�°N) s � / / / ►ol al . t� GB -j .r \_•. �.11 , lid RA o..."I [E { 11 s „ y.. i COMMERCIAL •C'". PLANNEDCEVELOPMCNY � Ind ....... _. LD '.' Intl '. � .• 711 ' GEI T : :.,p •' . - 11' �... II I' 1174 ..: PN 1 •I.) _ na �I-.l� .i' P.r. • r y RgD� RN RR .R i I P ._. ❑ 'i Ind. 1 i Intl - NB. LB Rg - "°I R -III L La CSC. .,..I R'll .l.I r, Ra R�II • � .. Iy •.f• Ind 1 RIII f^`.'.':y::: ✓�I :1 (,. _ :•l ,RII -ii It 11 P s, ] .: ,,.RI '1 RI. E P R -I io ® `•R -N Rill 1•-` ! tl. RI r 1\• - RIII .� �w .. [Try .:�. -•i(; �" I L R�0 RI R -II 'i R.1 I N RG •. R11I L "•` _—_ .. JRt�:..P,� •'R'I".- 1r'r[x R -II R -II A, RII RII s V M 1 L LB [i E, _ ( \ 0 .bq'Ji R-1 RIII RB RIII ,. hR': •l it .li:• F.1 :-. I ,.� IIIIIII t R.IP RIII 1;. I " R[I CSCIGB/ / '/hj+ � R -II \ �n R -III' I''ci.. �' •�Si111L1 P i �r-py� E-'��.`._r': `.' P YJ l t CSC I! E R -II a p'11 NB l Ci: ..t•� R-I.i). '.(y.:- : IRI 'I'' P i LB R -III LB /^I R'I CSC , . 1, • i `' - '' •R. 1` LB D LB„R_I P !LCI ;°I I, �, R -I '1 j�..r�, l-__ �\•'\j C1 6P . p -I f WL R -II Pi lr . R -Illi Y"•rs N' /�__ riJ R'11 : I .t �. p-li"I� P -- L f R-11 r,:'” Li •°_..�_ P ['jw.. -„a. e"r 1P - � � �� ...--- --- �1• , lel, ,, , i — Pn'IF vGLLCY LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (07u t/ocre) R -II mixed residenUaIUBIMIocre) R -III mixed residential f5Rlnd/acrd R- IV multiple (•RinNacre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial R&D reseercn&de lopment COMMERCIAL LB limned business NB neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks, Quasi public E.M,I-G.schools FEB. 198, CITY OF EAGAN '_AGAND,ALEI -- 4'1—OST SPUR 747T- - , COUNTRY _ . Cure RB !I PARK -' LB v c5; No 3 A Ii RD 1 \'N;L�� "4 L L cY Hier '✓1c''.`! y' ,PARK - / -LATEA --- - — \N C. �P ic. `x -- - — - iPK:/ �Pbcr — _ --- - --- HQML, X1..,.4 Lli TRE.._� LE Ac,��- 1. 1 33USD_ ZEHNDER AGf�f –= ;4t:iq;,Tg-AN% A 1 ;OME�f� NQS Fil 0' = R 4 I � PARK % coA +qy PF -- -- 'PF I 1 Cb -4 (COACHMAN I c Ks R-3 R-3 ACHMAN7L7__ 1 IGH LAND RD— R-4 ADDITION - 3 _�Yol FOX P 'K GBI�' RIDGE N B _� rs 73 0 G 7 l�11 -URREY Gg RB '� I - I rd ;1117O F. !Ic 01 *I :P-9 98,0 02.0 3 SPANDE -1 TM ADD 1T10N SUBJECT PARCEL m— FIG. #1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate #: RPUBLIC $WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN APC Minutes July 23, 1985 2. Only the pylon sign for Flour Bin is approved with this conditional use permit. 3. All other setback requirements and ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. Ray Anderson, Jr. shall personally guarantee that there is 300 feet between the sign and the possible sign to the east in the same plat. All members voted in favor. RAX RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public hearin on the application of Rax Restaurant for a condi al use <rA ermit to relocate a pylon sign in Lot 2, Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addi on of a northeast quarter of Section • 19. Dale Runkle introduced t eat' n and reviewed the staff report of July 18, 1985. He stated tt A had been vacated and turned back to the property owners which alloweto move the pylon sign to the west, closer to the new boundary line.pplicant was not present and there were no comments from the public. ponse to questions from the commission, Runkle stated that no pros anticipated with distance between neighboring signs, butthat h ct say for sure. Members of the commission expressed their nceccording to the sketch, the lots are 200 feet wide which cou resuhe sign being too close to an adjoining sign. McCrea moved, Har{son sethe otion to continue the hearing to the August 27, 1985 meeting to allow the sf-aff to investigate the Location of the Perkins sign, 'and to find out where Jerkins might move its sign, if it does. All members voted in favor. SPANDE 7TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT • Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Roy Spande for preliminary plat approval of Spande 7th Addition containing 4 single family lots on 3.4 acres in part of Government Lot 7 in part of the southwest quarter of Section 4. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. The applicant appeared and stated that his son was also present, that the intention is for his son to occupy Lots 1 and 2, and for Lots 3 and 4 to be sold, that Lot 2 might be sold in the future, but he had no concerns concerning easements, but he did have questions concerning the assessments. Chairman Hall noted that assessment questions would be addressed by the Assessment Committee and the City Council, rather than the Planning Commission. There were questions from the public concerning storm drainage in the area and it was mentioned that Mr. Post had installed a• drain tile in the area. Rich Hefti stated that he was unaware of the drain tile, but that it could be provided that the developer would be responsible for keeping the drain tile in place, or providing an alternative tile if it is disturbed. He mentioned that there is a 24 -inch culvert which had been installed by the City, which will be included in an easement to be provided by the developer, and that ultimately,'it will be replaced with a concrete storm sewer which will go all the way down to Highway A13.. The applicant stated 4 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 that there is a ravine down Lot 4, as well as one across Lot 1, and that it is not the intention of the developer to change the ravines or the culvert. It was also mentioned by Rich Hefti that a utility easement will be provided by the developer on the plat, along the south lot line of Block 4. In response to questions from the commission, the applicant stated that the barn on Lot 2 will stay, the chicken coop on Lot 3 will be demolished,, but that the garage will be used. Harrison suggested that according to the map provided, the garage might be too close to the property line. Hefti stated that it appears that the garage does encroach on the 5 foot utility easement along the east lot line of Lot 1, and that it might be best to move the lot line between Lots 1 and 2, 5 feet to the east. ' Harrison moved, Wold seconded the motion to- recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Spande 7th Addition, containing 4 single family lots on 3.4 acres on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: • 1. Buyers purchasing Lots 2, 3, and 4 shall be made aware by the developer of air traffic noise, and the developer shall provide proper insulation in the construction of new dwellings. 2. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review and comment for park dedication. 3. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 4. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be constructed into each lot. 5. A 30 -foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated on the final plat for both Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue. 6. A 30 -foot drainage utility easement along the southerly boundary of . the proposed development shall be dedicated to provide for future trunk storm sewer line. 7. This development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer and street reconstruction assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. All applicable standard engineering conditions shall be adhered to. 9. The west lot line of Lot 2 shall be moved 5 feet to the east to keep the garage in compliance with City Code. All members voted in favor. 5 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER D. Rezoning for Wyndham Corporate Center (Trammell Crow Co.) of Approximately 21 Acres to a Planned Development and a Prelim- inary Plat Containing One Lot and One Outlot--A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider an application to rezone approxi- mately 21.43 acres from AG, LB & RB to a commercial planned devel- opment. This development would allow one garden hotel, three office buildings and 10,000 square feet of retail services. A second application was submitted for a preliminary plat approval of the Wyndham Corporate Center 1st Addition with 4.95 acres •and consisting a one lot for a garden hotel facility and one outlot consisting of approximately 16.49 acres for development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval with three additional conditions to the staff report as follows: 1) the parking stalls be ten feet wide. The proof of parking be reviewed in one year to determine adequacy or if more spaces should be required. 2) Eagandale Boulevard shall be a minimum of 36' wide. 3) The sanitary sewer to be placed in capacity and in adequate depth to provide access to property to the south. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planning and Engineering Departments' report found on pages_ Lthrough �. For a copy of the minutes of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) 5,10 — glg The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Wyndham Corporate Center on August 15th. After review of the preliminary plat, the Commission recommended ,• that this be subject to the City's cash dedication requirements for commercial property consistent with its policy. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny, first the rezoning and secondly, the preliminary plat as presented. IN N CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT-WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER APPLICANT: TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY LOCATION: PART OF SEa OF NEa OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: AG (agricultural), LB (limited business) and RB (roadside business) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 16, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 21.43 acres from AG (agricultural), LB (limited business) and RB (roadside business) to a commercial planned development. This development would allow one garden hotel, three office buildings and 10,000 sq. ft. of retail services located in part of the SE; of the NE; of Section 4. The second application submitted is a request for preliminary plat approval of the Wyndham Corporate Center 1st Addition with 4.95 acres and consists of one lot for garden hotel facility and one outlot consisting of approximately 16.49 acres for develop- ment. COMMENTS: The development plan, Eagan Woods, which was the property Trammel Crow had purchased first, is the parcel directly north of the parcel for consideration. The P.D. now submitted would contain a total of 21.43 acres and is just south of the property • they had previously purchased. The P.D. Eagan Woods,to the north, consisted of two office buildings and a hotel is now being considered for development as an all office complex or three office buildings vs. the hotel. Therefore, Eagan Woods P.D. would now consist of a single use of office on the property to the north. The Wyndham Corporate Center, the P.D. now under consideration, is the old MPCA property which Trammel Crow has purchased and added to their land holdings in this general area. In review of this P.D. is the location where they have chosen to locate the hotel complex instead of the property to the north. The planned development submitted would consist of 21.43 acres and contain one hotel, three office buildings, which would range from 41, 000 sq. ft. to 66, 500 sq. ft., and a one story 10,000 sq. ft. retail facility to provide support facilities to this office and hotel complex. The total land development would consist of one hotel, two three-story office buildings, one two-story office building, and one one-story retail building for a total of 5 buildings in this planned development. 70 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 The first phase of the development is proposed to be the two story garden hotel. The facility is proposed to consist of 134 guest rooms, 2300 sq. ft. of meeting space and a 98 seat restaurant and lounge facility. The parking spaces required for this restaurant/hotel facility would be 200. The applicants are proposing to provide 158 spaces noting that they feel there is an overlap between the rooms, restaurant, and meeting spaces that their past history for parking spaces is less then what we are requiring. The applicants are proposing to provide an additional 46 spaces in a proof of parking plan for a total of 204 parking spaces which could be provided if required by the City. Access to this P.D. would be from the major access at Eagan Industrial Boulevard, Eagan Woods Drive, and Pilot Knob Road* The same access which is serving Eagan Woods, the development to the north, is also the same road access which is serving Wyndham Corporate Center. The access and traffic circulation is the same as what was originally proposed to the north and now the concept of continuing the loop street system around to the south and back out to the original point of entry. The hotel facility will be located in the central area or the heart of the development plan. The Preliminary Plat submitted would only allow Lot 1, Block 1, Wyndham Corporate Center, to start the preliminary plat process. As stated earlier in this report Lot 1 is the location of the garden hotel which they plan to construct as their first phase. The remaining four buildings will be platted as an outlot and replatted and a detailed site plan submitted with each phase of development. • GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading for Phase 1 (proposed hotel) appears to be in conformance with all City Codes. Where storm water runoff cannot be conveyed directly into nearby storm sewer, the developer proposes on providing temporary ponds for sediment/ erosion control. These- temporary ponds will assist greatly in controlling erosion on the westerly portion of this site where the steepest grades and roughest terrain exists. The installation of storm sewer with the Eagan Woods Boulevard construction will provide an outlet for storm water collected over the eastern half of this proposed development. This storm water eventually discharges to a detention pond constructed with the Eagan Woods Office Park Addition. This 'proposed development will not require the installation of any trunk storm sewer. REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 SANITARY SEWER: This development proposes to extend an 8" sanitary sewer from the "North Interceptor" south along Pilot Knob Road. This proposed layout is not in conformance with the City's Compre- hensive Sewer Plan. As shown on Figure 1, this development was to be included in sanitary sewer subdistrict N -J. By servicing this development as proposed, sanitary sewer subdistrict N -J will decrease in area and sanitary sewer subdistrict N -K will increase in area. However, because the MWCC "North Interceptor" is -the,.-ultimate recipient of waste water from either .sanitary sewer subdistrict, staff does not feel 'the proposed sanitary sewer extension will cause any problems. • Because the location of the sanitary sewer extension is within Dakota County Highway• right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road, this development will need to acquire a permit from the Dakota County Highway Department for utility construction within Dakota County right-of-way. Also, this development will require a permit from the MWCC to connect to its "North Interceptor." Staff does not anticipate any difficulties in obtaining either permit. The developer will be responsible for obtaining both permits as a condition of final plat approval. WATER MAIN: The Eagan Woods Office Park Addition project included extension of an existing 12" water main across Pilot Knob Road from Corporate Center Drive. The location of this water main is within Eagan Woods Boulevard and terminates at Eagan Woods Drive. This water main is of sufficient size and capacity, to provide service to this development. Staff does recommend the southern extension of this water main to the end of the radius • located in the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. The reason for this extension is that staff will be recommending the extension of Eagan Woods Boulevard southerly from the entrance drive to this point. This development will not require any extensions or upgrading of trunk water or sanitary sewer. STREETS: Again, Eagan Woods Office Park Addition project is providing for the construction of Eagan Woods Boulevard. This street will provide access to Lot 1, Block 1. However, staff recommends that Eagan Woods Boulevard be extended southerly from the entrance onto Pilot Knob Road to the end of the radius located at the southeast corner of Lot '1, Block 1. This extension will pick up traffic from the proposed southerly driveway of the motel. This street extension shall be built to City standards, that is a 36 ft. wide curb and gutter street built to 9 -ton loading status. 7v _ REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends the dedication of adequate right-of-way for Eagan Woods Boulevard located in the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. In addition, staff recommends the dedication of a 60 ft. right-of-way for the curve located at the southeast corner of this lot. Staff does not recommend any further easements other than the easements required by code. ASSESSMENTS: Staff researched the assessment records and found that this development is responsible for trunk area water main and storm sewer assessments. The following table summarizes these assessments ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Est'd 1985 Description Qty. Rates Trunk Area Water Main Lot 1, Block 1 4.95 Ac $3,020/Act Outlot A 13.20 Ac(1)$3,020/Ac) Trunk Area Storm Sewer Lot 1, Block 1 215,622 S.F. $0.072/S.F.�3� Outlot A 574,992 S.F.1 $0.072/S.F. (1)Includes 208 credit for future R/W. • Amount $14,950 $39,860 $15,520 $41,400 (2)Includes $1,830/Ac water availability connection charge for Com/Ind.• (3)Com/Ind. Rate. Assessments for Lot 1, Block 1, are due at the time of final plat- ting at the rates in effect at that taime. Outlot A assessments will be due upon future development at the rates in effect at that time. 73 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: If this planned development is approved it should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the overall planned development as submitted with the planning report dated July 16, 1985. This development agreeement shall be for a period of five years unless appropriate extensions have been applied for. 2) An architectural design shall be extablished by the developer and reviewed by City Staff in order that all of the buildings will have a common architectural theme. • 3) Accoustical treatment shall be provided within the building in order to minimize any noise impacts along with the site from planes overhead, I-494, or Pilot Knob Road. 4) A general grading plan and overall landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted and the detailed plans submitted with each phase of development. 5) The P.D. shall be reviewed by the Eagan Parks Commission in regard to park dedication for this development proposal. 6) Standard preliminary plat conditions shall be applied. 7) The detailed landscape plans shall be reviewed and compared with the general theme of the landscaping for the planned development. • 8) The width of the parking spaces shall be determined by the APC. Presently, the applicants are proposing 38 10 -foot wide spaces and 116 nine -foot wide parking spaces. 9) This development will be responsible for obtaining all neces- sary permits for the sanitary sewer extension. 10) The 12" water main for Eagan Woods Boulevard shall be extended southerly from the entrance road through the radius located at the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. 11) A 60' right-of-way shall be dedicated for the southerly extension of Eagan Wood Boulevard. 12) This development shall be responsible for trunk area water main and storm sewer assessments for Lot 1, Block 1, at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 13) All costs associated with public improvements construction for this development shall be their responsibility. 7�_ `4,'�•e l�, r,. 1j MEN DO TA \'\TS North Interceptor \\ . - Z _ N- K,rnl.a I.r,r• r•a •\�. j, --- 7 - r . I I - NSM,. /� q , - 0 qST SP'In N' I 21 x.1211 76/ aLrE� c _�✓/� GUN CLUB yl :. •.r r:n , �•T.••,.•;:;; •_� I �i� � i .:�1�•.ar v I �� - LAKE _ ,• Ir—Ilc[ Ir..3.r •v.Ewj�Z 11 �( /V 2r1 'r. .30�n^ ceu RK 30 5 _ �I IN /I.. ` 77 . j Y�';1� 136'1 i'l i„I �.�"'�r•, �nr.�=.s I `�'/d`� ' �rI'--�_-=+=%y N_. L 1B ZIA> N -A P ..t\ N- F a ` _..rFAQ L _W _ ',• II 'PILO; `.. .. ` J 36 . �..�.. 67 N—B I I �`-..Ar.. L'�—I. USPOSTAL CF q iryns:cD '1 /.I �,..�, x.•.11 n'• ,��: r h"I , — ` N-C�%- i cNFr2=E5D5 - / jLE //PARK J-1 j+Qron r3o L 15114 f A,cncv1 FOX = 30n •/l – �.a PICGE ..1 JL., ;% N —E D L Y" N -V -B WYND14AH CORP. CENTEF2 SUBJECT PARCEL city of SANITARY SEWER an � PUBBLICLIC $ WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN FIG. *2 approved: standard plate q#: WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER PILOT KNOB ROAD AT 1-494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA • TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY/ BLOOMINGTON, MN OWNER • WILSON / JENKINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS • HANSEN, THORP, PELLINEN, OLSON, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS METROPOLITAN AREA CORPORATE CENTER „VICINITY MAP Iia—353.•.v :i.=:: rgELDA ARV PLAT A REZONNG SIBMRLL FOR WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER uou TINE VICH NAP PU PAGANDAUEI 74-7 PU F't F, I c RY UB -R B LB I T t; ST NO 3 A I R D Ly -q 71 VALLEY HicH PARK ACREJ NO" FFLATCAQ p CL/ KT— R-1 l. -p TREFFLE ACRES i-17iLL Pl�--EY SUBD ZEHNCER ACP 'AinR- 4 IrdG GARDENS i p P, .CRW F. z l 0 FR B 5 ip Ir ..... . _77 -- -------- A o�pp 6., 0 0 0 0 Z:t- 1 b" THMMU CROW CO. 0 0 .. ......... -- --------- �PUT REZOMW�TTa FOR WVWMAU CORPORATE CENTER EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS rLrIl 0 M.Ia 2 OFFICE r �• �_ , HOTEL - I J 0 l� \ 3 FF 3OFFICE 7� (�) Lr f r,r y7 ` �' 1 ry'. w I L1 _- �� 4OFFICE `-- ^i? .i:^ ill"✓ ',! 4 S� �`l�."1.,.[[�� t�_ (411 •..fir � _ YN.M1l. • �. .1 .. +jr..l err\g �.�1. }.FT..�T rvCrik'l.lN1'i'�yl�`\!v �._ —_ __ ley EAGM MUSTRIAL BLVD. Ii1 TRAMMELLCROW CO, TRAMM vn In eoa.enn,e..wu Ry&moIJ��kins -_'aT—•STATISTICS: P1ELMONARY PIAT a Parking Site Area 21.435 acres/933,700 6.1. FOR WYNDHAM 166 Building Type Area No.Storles 269 CONCEPT PLAN 1 xe1.1 algoo / 13j Room � 2 2 Dine0 41,00081 2 ® , y 3 Dint• 4 66,50081 05,00081 3 3 011ie. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN 5 R.wl 10,0000 1 ��r • reeve a r�ro emea mmn m em w Ii1 TRAMMELLCROW CO, TRAMM vn In eoa.enn,e..wu Ry&moIJ��kins P1ELMONARY PIAT a Parking "QONPO SAL 1061207)• FOR WYNDHAM 166 CORPORATE CENTER 266 — - ,DEVELOPMENT 269 CONCEPT PLAN 36 ewwe� r Elaw mom OFFICE PARE i b �i�i / •�,.,' "�' � Y1'b'Fe.rYF I QQ7h»,\'�\��II�'.� IS r- LB (limited blakress) I ' / RB (roodiga bi6+55)av �` ` � : \ off• Fd° / � � i IL W .._ /. ',':• noxi � �;\ 0�7 � ,,,,r�,f UNDE'f1pED A nN n ELO WALE MJMR N....n p i,,{Pu rim` PREUMMM rMZO� BUBWTT� / FOR WYF HAU CORPORATE CE PREUMWARY PLAT •_!/F IJ__ l/ifr/6/M m y . � .� �.' u• I � �M1� 6.�O�N �. ��L,I I . f . PROPOSED I„ L /• I1111T IL0011 E1EVA110 ..lOM•9�1I /.: °.-cp OF O TRMAIELL oaoW CO V w 'ab �,\ I+; \ (I � \ r - �\` /- .•. ��:�' F111P11A AT � fTNTER .. - PHASE 1 I dm..�. 'p' _5 ti D • m M.Ic 1M..... w I. 'fR�l CNDw CO FON WYNDHAM DNPORA" CLMDI WWF INMMELLCROWC0. • I IJ —7 WO.V... WR. i.[ III1 � .. I � xGOrnV..t•4N. i I: rT ` r I y{IW�D.mk - I I If -- gRllOIARY RAT / REZONg061®fRAE FOR WTMOMAM CORPORATE CENTER - 1EYEr@ Ma.R r.xwR - r - uriurr PLAN UTILITY PLAN ie _ p�l"" xeu� mR m.+wr rr ce.cR.mic. ,LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN I YI I D EADAR 0=3TRULL BLVD. O2 d PLANTING LEGEND P PRESERVATION F FOCAL/FEATURE C CIRCULATION V VISUAL RELIEF/SHADE B BUILDING PERIMETER IIemI I TRAYNEUCROWDD, 000 ormn. s.. un m K'iknnl J.•nkinA FOR WYNDHAM EANDBCAPE CONCEFFPLAN GO Ind Ind.. COMMERCIAL If - p PLAMIEDED pEVEIDvELOPMENY -.Iry.. I r-•;. 'i:. �` •• Intl , •au•(I,I�rr LB R11'. • h �. ' '{ •1' +�` P 7 Ind .• 1 III 'a7 ^ R,1 HRI.-• ' •:� B TTI RIL.]' • I n �' ` ::)' - .:.. ;" �•.: Al c T• .'I• e ^� RN 1 •II,..,.,. InO''II`i til Py' R&D) RN R,III ©'• ' i �•''.`. Ind. �. Q` l ... Intl. - NB_. �.o 'YI . R -III • RJI LB r, II 'willP ' R41. [RI p.l RII / _ .. -' R � / --- •_• .. ... . L�� _ ,. • ti's R -I F i ,�..•. '`: '/ I ..�. t:: ..i .I' :I: is 1 RII ., Intl 11 / ni RIII �T I 0 ,. R -I ..� tR,• E '/R 1 P R I Lo R91 - a �JEV\I '. Intl `.I lC i R-1 R.Y 1 y I R.1 N . SIC R -N •_i.P ..!__; �I RAI w l deli.... '' • 7 1 .RII � I RI . P •)1\JC iil��r��._ ,.R -II R-111 �'-".�` __ "'�.'!!1'Ij p .g -'•RI' J fi R -II ++ E • _� '{, /, n •It r� ES .. L IL3 1 /F• •. ... .... _.. LB �nII{II jj R -0I I I RB RN •' -1 E % !A k'q'll R I P -III R-IY R-111 R'' i .1`!: Il;i R 1%, 7• . R -LI CSCIGBI RO R.� j= . R 1 . . . �i CCCLLU�iggJJIIILUUJIII I1�.11 ('� P E RSI. RII. _ r:ii•p-Y -4, ,� �: •j. "' ..I sL1/•i.. '•'•'I '..., I{� R'1 r` IN13:" �lEf iL'• 'o'P,_I I�. :�I: f-�.:... I�0.1. I'�1 U'1 [:r. , LB R-YI LD 9.1 ,.4, .+. CSC • .., ,1'. • ,j l.•• LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (OJlnflacrd R -II Mixed res.denllal(36uitlacre) R -III mixed residentia162mnlocrd R. IV multiple (•RuWaad INDUSTRIAL Ind. industrial R&D research BdNelopment COMMERCIAL LB limited business NO neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P porks•Ruasl public E•M,NS.schools ' L VLRB-I � R�° LRB -I / RI RIe�":.:;' • - •1 FEB. 1981 P P R•Y I: 4 - / i� P R-11 CITY OF EAGAN .. � J; `":_ .-.. � may, /r'7ia•:L xnuxf •,. 71 IALLEV ::�y:: :7'� .,`r;,i.•• 1, APC Minutes July 23, 1985 WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER - REZONING 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Trammel Crow Company for rezoning from Roadside Business, Limited Business, and Agricultural, to Commercial Planned Development, located in part of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4, west of Pilot Knob Road, and for preliminary plat approval of Wyndham Corporate Center to contain a hotel and office building at the same location. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 16, 1985. He stated that it was the intention to tie this property into the property to the north, that the hotel would be built on the Wynaham Corporate Center rather than'property to the north, that a detailed site plan had been provided, that the size of parking stalls was an issue with the developer proposing 9 by 20 foot stalls for most of the plat, and that the developer had agreed to provide a proof of parking exhibit. • Robert Hoffman, attorney for Trammel Crow Company, appeared representing the applicant and stated that the applicant now feels that the subject property is the best place for the hotel, that Trammel Crow Company is still a major partner in the development, that the hotel is the same design as used in other parts of the country, that it is designed to appeal to a higher priced market with people staying several days to a week or more, rather than just a day or two, that a variance from the standard parking requirements is requested to allow 158 parking spaces, rather than 200, that the developer can provide proof of parking for 10 by 20 foot parking stalls if necessary, that the purpose of reducing the amount and size of parking stalls is not to reduce cost, but rather to keep vegetation to a maximum and blacktop to a minimum to improve the aesthetics of the project, that thirty-three 10 by 20 foot stalls are proposed for the restaurant area, four 12 by 20 foot stalls are proposed for handicapped spaces, and the remainder of the stalls would be 9 by 20 feet .for use by people in the rooms and meeting areas, with the understanding that people using the hotel in the meeting areas would not be moving in and out as • quickly as people in the restaurant and lounge area. Members of the public questioned whether the sanitary sewer planned for the area would be sufficient to take care of properties to the south, if necessary, as well. Rich Hefti stated that it would be sufficient. Gary O'Brien of Trammel Crow Company appeared and described the hotel and mentioned that it would be a two-story 134 room hotel, with a projected $55.00 to $60.00 per night rate, with French architectural style, marble in the lobby, custom carpets and furniture and other amenities. There was discussion concerning the zoning of the property, and Chairman Hall noted that the property is currently zoned to allow this development, but that the developer prefers to develop it as a planned development. Dale Runkle stated that most of the hotel lot is zoned Roadside Business and the remainder is zoned Limited Business. Wilkins stated that they would have to come before the Commission again before they start any buildings, and McCrea stated that a review in a year to determine if there is parking overflow would be necessary. Hoffman agreed to a one-year review relating to parking. O'Brien stated that they hoped to break ground by October 1, 1985. Wold stated that he recalled that the Yankee Square Inn was required to have ten foot wide parking stalls because it waas� not a controlled parking lot, that in 6 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 some cases, Less parking spaces had been required if the facility was very large, but even inthosecases, expansion area would be required. Runkle stated that perhaps it could be required that other buildings could not be started until parking for the hotel is upgraded, if it is a problem. Hefti stated that the 36 -foot street entrance to -provide two lanes out and one lane in would be sufficient, even in winter. Runkle stated that there would be a buffer to the south, between this development and the R-1 area further to the south. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of Trammel Crow Company for rezoning from Roadside Business, Limited Business,,and Agricultural, to Commercial Planned Development, located in the property described above, subject to the -following conditions: 1. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the overall planned development, as submitted with the planning report dated July 16, 1985. This development agreement shall be for a period of 5 years unless • appropriate extensions have been applied for and approved by the City Council. 2. The planned development for the property to the north shall be amended to provide that the space designated for a hotel or office building shall be designated for an office building and the designation for a hotel shall be removed. Voting in favor were Wold, Trygg and McCrea; voting against were Harrison and Wilkins; and abstaining was the chair. The motion passed. Wola moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval of Wyndham Corporate Center to contain a hotel and office building on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. An architectural design shall be established by the developer and reviewed by City staff in order that all of the buildings will have a common • architectural theme. 2. Accoustical treatment shall not be provided within the building in order to minimize any noise impacts along with the site from planes overhead, I-494, or Pilot Knob Road. 3. A general grading plan and overall landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted and the detailed plans submitted with each phase of the development for review and approval by City staff. 4. The planned development shall be reviewed by the Eagan Parks Commission with regard to park dedication for this development proposal. 5. Standard preliminary plat conditions shall be applicable. 6. The detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed and compared with the general theme of the landscaping for the planned development. 7. All parking spaces shall be 10 feet wide. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for the sanitary sewer extension. APC Minutes July 23, 1985 9. The 12 -inch watermain -for Eagan Woods Boulevard shall be extended southerly from the entrance road through the radius located at the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. 10. A 60 -foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for the southerly extension of Eagan Woods Boulevard. 11. This development shall be responsible for trunk area watermain and storm sewer assessments for Lot 1, Block 1, at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 12. All costs associated with public improvement construction for this development shall be the responsibility of the development. • 13. No parking shall be allowed on the internal access road of Eagan Woods Boulevard. 14. The entrance road shall be a minimum width of 36 feet. 15. Sanitary sewer shall be adequate to handle the property to the south of the proposed development. 16. A variance shall be allowed from the 200 parking spaces required by code to allow 158 spaces with the condition that parking shall be reviewed by staff within one year and if necessary, additional parking spaces shall be provided by the developer upon staff review. 17. The developer shall provide a proof of parking exhibit to indicate the location of possible additional parking spaces. The developer stated that he was aware of the standard preliminary plat • conditions and again urged that parking on the north, south and west of the hotel be 9 feet in width, rather than 10 feet in width. Wold stated that he would not change his motion, because this is not a controlled parking lot. Voting in favor of the motion were Wold, Trygg and McCrea; voting against were Wilkins and Harrison; and abstaining was the chair. The motion passed. A 15 minute recess was taken at 9:00 p.m. ON 8 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four PRELIMINARY PLAT/WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Wedgwood 2nd Addition Consisting of Approximately 10 Acres and Containing 22 Lots on Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition --A public hearing was held on July 23, 1985, to consider an application requesting preliminary plat approval for Wedgwood 2nd Addition consisting of approximately 10 acres and containing 22 single-family lots located on Outlot C, Wedgwood lst Addition. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending appro- val of the preliminary plat subject to conditions in the staff report and further, that all lots should meet the R1 minimum zoning standards. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Departments' report found on pages - _96 through. For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to • page(s) Q2—/" . The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Wedgwood 2nd Addition. It was noted that this preliminary plat is within the Lexington South PUD which has previously completed its parkland dedication. However, the Commission recommended that this preliminary plat be responsible for a bituminous trailway along Wilderness Run Road through the extent of its plat. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Wedgwood 2nd Addition. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES, INC. (BRADLEY SWENSON - JIM CURRY) LOCATION: OUTLOT C, WEDGWOOD IST ADDITION SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (MIXED RESIDENTIAL - 3 TO 6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE UNDER LEXINGTON SO. P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 __ DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15,. 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING 8 ENGINEERING DEPTS. ® APPLICATION SUBMITTED: -•An application has been submitted requesting Preliminary Plat approval for._ Wedgwood 2nd Addition consisting of approx. 10 acres and containing 22 single family lots located on Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition, Section 26. COMMENTS: Presently the parcel is zoned R-2 under the Lexington South Planned Development. This would allow development to take place within the range of 3 - 6 dwelling units per acre. The Comp. Guide Plan has also designated this parcel as an R-2, mixed residential, with a density of 3 - 6 Dwelling units/acre. The applicant is proposing to develop at a gross density of 2.2 Dwelling units/acre or a net density of approx. 2.5 - 2.7 units/acre. Therefore, this application is slightly less than the densities allowed in the Comp. Guide and the zoning for the parcel. Outlot C, Wedgwood Addition, is a parcel that is surrounded to the north by an existing highline trail and park and the property directly east and west has been dedicated to the City for park and open space requirements for the Lex. South P.D. The track of land has physical boundaries on all four sides. Besides the physical boundaries, there is much vegetation, two very low de- pressions and sever topography on the site. The applicant is proposing to develop a loop street to provide access to the 22 single family lots. In the preliminary review, it appears that a substantial amount of fill would be required to develop this parcel in accordance with the development plan. All but one of 'the lots meet the 12,000 S.F. plus category and all lots, except two, have a minimum of 85' lot width at the 30' setback. The applicant is proposing to develop a loop street which would make all access internal and only two points of entry onto Wilder- ness Run Rd. The lots appear to be oversized in order to accomodate the topography and vegetation as much as possible. Fill will still be required in order to make this development work. ✓6 PRELIMINARY PLAT - WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2. UTILITIES & DRAINAGE: There is sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service available to serve this development. The City will require an updated drainage and storm sewer plan with contours at 2' intervals indicating how this property will drain and shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the City for approval. The storm water runoff from this development is proposed to drain to Pond LP -50, which is located just to the east of this proposed development on park property. The storm sewer outlet pipe shall be constructed to 891.5 elevation and constructed to Pond LP -50. CITY TRAIL: The City's Comprehensive Trail System indicates that there is to be a trail constructed along the north side of Wilderness Run Rd. which will be the responsibility of this development. This item will be reviewed by the Park Commission. STREETS: Access to this proposed plat is by Wilderness Run RID which borders the south side of this development. The City will require a plan that indicates that the east entrance of the Hidden Valley Dr entrance onto wilderness Run Rd will line up with the east entrance of Waterford Dr of the Wedgwood First Addition. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet (10') in width adjoining all streets and five feet (5') in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. The City will require utility easements a minimum of twenty (20') in width for all public utilities not constructed within the street right-of- way. This item will be reviewed again when the utility plans for this subdivision have been submitted along with the final plat. EROSION CONTROL & GRADING PLAN: The developer shall submit a,* erosion and sediment control plan to the City for review and approval. the City will require an enviro fence along the easterly property line of this proposed plat between Pond LP -50 and this development. The developer shall submit a grading plan indicating the existing and proposed contours at 2' intervals with drainage arrows indicating how this property will drain. ASSESSMENTS: In reviewing the assessments levied over this proposed development which consists of Outlot C of the Wedgwood 1st Addition, it was found that all trunk related assessments have been levied. All future costs for public improvements shall be the sole responsi- bility of this development. 71 CONDITIONS: Wedgwood 2nd Addition 1, The bubble shall be installed as proposed on the Preliminary Plat. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by City staff. 4. The developer shall construct a bituminous trail in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Trail system and it shall be constructed to City specification as determined by the Park Commission. • 5. The developer shall dedicate the necessary drainage_ and ponding easement for Pond LP -50. The easement shall cover all areas below the 893.6 elevation. Utility & drainage easements shall be dedicated as required by Staff. 6. The City will require that the east entrance of Hidden Valley Dr onto Wilderness Run Rd line up with the east entrance of Waterford Dr of the Wedgwood First Addition. 7. This development will not be granted drive access to any of the lots abutting Wilderness Run Rd. 8. All costs for internal utilities and streets shall be the sold responsibility of this development. 9. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the • Standard Engineering Conditions, 10. The City will require plan profiles of the utilities and streets to be submitted to the City for review and approval. Wscm DCWD ?004r PIIRKLAND N BY•SS'fY` W u JUG Bo Y9 41 wo roo ,S nu Yif z I L o C. K t 3 = 4 s a b a 7 I ='S I e S 10 • n oAoI °f Bs ,f Q HIDDEN VALLEY DRIVE •L °° r Yo id r •. °. 12 3 _ - (� h •::., : n•tT•o�•fY• �e °co PARKLAND A, 161.1, ' � 6 `U N br �2• I I 7 a V.1 Inf/�Dfv og W r:s o RnIESs RUN R , 4. yy Y9 '2 •• r oc %/ RoyD s^ is N)l oyy• r90 0 VICINITY MAP SEC. Z6, ,� =,. r ;[ i . SM PLAN .... ., LEGAL OESCRIPTiOK OUT T C,W10CW000 FIR5T ADDITION j ZONING: PUD- K -C DENSITY: GBUSS 22 UNIT ACRE N I AREA: 10 ACRES •' • " I UNITS: 22 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS so N r SCALE, lo= 100' i I � 1 / i \ 0 0 N Et4*SS'fY' W 22P •In.•r .914 w .q`3 UL 4�" 917' -_�-`'-.• e .�-- -•pal: -- �Aa ' � •� - ' :iH'DD � IYALL'EY�t,D �YE' ; a • ° �:-_' -- 'ao ....-r -- -: _- • _ "8d 9+t- V v4; 'o •. 1` 1• ..1 . a ,; ,, • - ��• �,— � � �� ;',. �'� ,'•.9Ei,r. .. • :.:oW 13 61 A. 761.10 Af IV t 49oY.07 - , •rot--- .4 d"- p'� --`; N)/oYY Z( .180-..•``-. `_'\ VICINITY MSP GRADING PLAN SEC. 24, CE' — — — — EnVING CONTouRS ,1 p�ovosEC `v No SCALE, I"= 100 �•ji` A. 17.O7'fY• ae I e I` F � i a • N �zsy, as i I ly, 4e'H •as S I 4 '• 0 d•I• i it o9•y VICINITY MAP SEC. 26, TM a,, RGE 1 N 89•ss,sY• W 89 B9 wo ' iso 80 u = Q L o c K ,I s . 9 to f .a .�f •A� �� . ., o, ,B as wo 3 •oe _ —f,I _ I _._ IL--G1� vutalnu^c l . . I_ I- 3, o •o Bo Bo Bs •„ 'to ca ro0.h fEwF• ✓.,, g L16 I vy to o z mo oe 5 I I �•ji` A. 17.O7'fY• ae I e I` F � i a • N �zsy, as i I ly, 4e'H •as S I 4 '• 0 d•I• i it o9•y VICINITY MAP SEC. 26, TM a,, RGE 1 x.w nw 490 Y.p� e UTILITY PIAN SANITARY SEWER -1 WATERMAIN —I—,— STORM SEWER 17 - - 0 IL 13 S 0 I yyt�,�wab Ef15711VG Fysgx e.� N w SCALE' I 100 .a �� is r.-•)�,�� — _ '- l� li _ - 1 / d RA 1.•':� ` I• d GB In LAND USE / I r (...:: till[„ CCPM+IERCIAL r n . / f= PLAhP ED DEVE �PNT GUIDE lei a ,1 r /! .j' PLAN - rr• ! Vii.• �I I• Ina ..... _. _ ., RIC.' 3 - I•, ••,. '-Li"U' Ind. ..I,. ... ..� � 11 ' .rod' /'..`• R1a'..:.. GBjP1 r: •A y-'i RN rAa. \Q .I' a i•• %-. •� �, .I P,_ RESIDENTIAL -.' v— 1 1 � I"""•:' Ind.' R-I single family (Odna/xre) ..I MR-11 mixe0 residential (3CwHlacrr) P © ,i,Yi Irid 1 R-01 mixed residential VA2u /acrd R. IV multiple (•2nd/acrd 1 / • qq Ind, „ 1, ND. LB RII ri.,� -ol p.01 11 i R INDUSTRIAL ✓%' .I'- ',c . 4t LB R-11 P •! Ral .. �f CSC. Ra CSF Ind II Ind mtluslnol � I II RII R8D research8aMloPnerit }} '•I Ra ' ? COMMERCIAL r r : • 1• �.t` / RI P Y LB smiled business r .�• _',' •• •rn:: `. i!. I I ! . �..'Rn rf! + I Ind NO neighborhood business I( •JI • _,,�% It•>I•'^..®! •� I V. I K•I .',-.Ji ..� 1• -��. -�� iE + P , fI vRIII • �.RlF-I a GB general business I CSC community shopp ing center � RSC regional snoppmp Center _R III .. -.:�. "'r''yL^ R41 '1 RB roadside business WN Ind �' �.I •RCT R-1 RV :� RI OPEN SPACE P. -/�..•: P porks.0ua5l public �.I E,M.1S,scnools R-II P R1 J RII �/�r R-III R-1I R-II J q LB B E t RB RID Jd. �III�L91 R-I f, R-Ili R91f A- I' ,4,- .�:I i Ru CSCIGBI RII 11-JFR 1 • E P , R✓ ✓. •'� R.p r R-IIyP _ ® ` For RII. R-II :e'lk l>. '��•1 - .':'.',•. g.� i�'•, :P:'Ra `.i // A <.�� -- I I r �. Il�.q 'J . RII .C. ..ill /J t I .. i'• RI R41: '1 .-1 i t' :: P ✓ F. L6 �•..:6 RB LB /. .. / R-I fI(X t - �1�I,I'I R-I G �i — P FEB. 198, R-1 R-1 f P ^� II `e. ^i � RI R-11 � , •. 0 R-11ryry .7 I R-11 Rat . F11 r P Pa'. ;� CITY OF EAGAN (.7 - U'J /�•',Ha'it Naafi t, � - 1 APPLE: VALLE♦ f: • fl /� 1 Blau. EW E DAKOTA COUNTY PA R K Py </ EXCEPT IUPJs A (NOT INCLUDE& IN PARK) V, it ly PARK A iA AG ROSEMOUN o qj A PARWALNUT A KWOOD SCHWAN PAi Ff&GH T. JF OAK POND EW E DAKOTA COUNTY PA R K Py </ EXCEPT IUPJs A (NOT INCLUDE& IN PARK) V, it ly PARK A iA AG ROSEMOUN o qj • it 1 _ 1—lJ-`.` A J-33 _4,J -_ 54 1 �� ` I i -36 r:) r I:..:. i. 4. \f -.L-6Z J-48 �'� �\ .a J-57 I.. i._ 1 �_� 1 I J�46 J-55 I I 1 \ /^7 I J-47 I J- L -7 L/ J-50 J-65 �� J \ ...� J-56/ J-52 \-51 / - L- 26 -.. _ J \N -14 18 =:v city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ' J -4C I __ I J J-431 28 1 L-35 L-40 nRgTZNE aou. 23 w FIG. #1 approved: standard plate C APC Minutes July 23, 1985 WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Tri -Lana Properties, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Wedgwood 2nd Addition, consisting of 10 acres and 22 lots at Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition in Section 26. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. Brad Swenson and Jim Curry, representing the developer, indicated that they were available for questions. In response to questions, Swenson stated that the home values would probably be between $80,000.00 and $100,000.00, and that the values would not be higher because there is a high power line to the north and condominiums to the east.' Curry stated that the development would be hidden from the street by the extensive trees. Wold asked which of the lots were under 12,000 square feet, and Runkle mentioned that the only one that he was aware of was Lot 1, Block 2. Swenson stated that they would be willing to adjust that lot to make it 12,000 square feet and all of the lots are 85 feet in width at the 30 foot setback line. He also stated that it would be expected that the maximum grade level on the road • would be 6%. He stated that grading on the lots would be minimized but that he could not know for sure how much would be necessary until work begins and it is determined what the soil is like. Curry stated that the woods at the rear of all of the lots would be retained. McCrea moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of Tri -Land Properties, Inc, for preliminary plat approval of Wedgwood 2nd Addition, consisting of 10 acres and 22 lots located in Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The street bubble shall be installed as proposed on the preliminary plat. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City staff for review and approval. 4. The developer shall construct a bituminous trail in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Trail system and it shall be constructed to City's specification as determined by the Park Commission. 5. The developer shall dedicate the necessary drainage and ponding easement for Pond LP -50. The easement shall cover all areas below the 893.6 elevation. Utility and drainage easements shall be dedicated as required by staff. 6. The east entrance of Hidden Valley Drive onto Wilderness Run Road shall line up with the east entrance of Waterford Drive of the Wedgwood 1st Addition. 7. This development shall not be granted driveway access to any of the lots abutting Wilderness Run Road. 8. All costs for internal utilities and streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development 9 /9 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 9. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the standard engineering conditions. 10. The developer shall submit plan profiles of the utilities and streets to the City staff for review and approval. 11. All lots shall meet R-1 requirements. 12. The planned development for Lexington South shall be amended to conform with the plat of Wedgwood 2nd addition and the density which is not used in the area of Wedgwood 2nd Addition shall not be shifted' to the remainder of the planned development. All members voted in favor. • LeMAY LAKE HILLS - REZONING 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing concerning the application of Al Kempf for rezoning from A Agricultural to PD Planned Development, for property located in part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, north of Towerview Road and for preliminary plat approv of LeMay Lake Hills consisting of approximately 1 .69 acres containing 8,sof.ngle family lots and 40 apartment units in the am e area. Dale d`nkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff :port dated July 1985. He stated that there have been neighborhood meet ngs with the d eloper but City staff were not aware of the concerns of the ne'ghbors. Gr ollenkamp, the architect, and Al Kempf, the applicant, were present. Mr. Hollenkamp stated that the townhouse units would be two be rooms, a buildings would be two stories, there would be 8 units per buildin , the they would be rental units with the possibility of being converted to c nd iniums at a later time, and that the rental rate would probably be a nd $500.00, but that he is not sure. In • response to questions from the pub c, Mr. Kempf stated that the cost of the townhouses would be about $40.00 square foot or about $40,000.00 per unit, that the vegetation by the la wo d not be disturbed by the developer, that there would be 2 and 112 par ng spa es per unit, one in the garage, one in front of the garage and 4 a ditional spaces for each building. Runkle stated that the parking ;and d would eet City Code. Mr. Kempf stated that the cost of the single famil lots would ange from $25,000.00 to $40,000.00 and that they would be sold individually, that there would be an approximate 120 foot buffer between Towerview Road and the townhouses, and that the street intersecting Towervie Road would do so west of Quarry Road. A neighboring property owner stated that the road at the south part of the plat would hit Quarry Road at the middle of Wachtler's house, that there is concern about traffic in the area, and that it would be preferable to have the road come out closer to Pilot Knob Road. Hall stated that there would be space needed for stacking along Towerview Road, and Hefti stated that 200 feet of stacking would be a minimum requirement. One neighboring property owner stated that the corner of Quarry and Towerview is hard to see around in the winter, and that it would be better to have the intersecting road farther from that intersection. Another neighbor stated a concern about rental units in the development, the lack of any real concept for the single family units, the 10 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five PRELIMINARY PLAT/LEMAY LAKE HILLS F. Preliminary Plat for LeMay Lake Hills Consisting of Approxi- mately 13.69 Acres Containing 8 Single Family Lots and 40 Apartment Units and Rezoning to a Planned Development -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider two (2) applications submitted by Al Kempf to consider 1) rezoning of approximately 13.69 acres from Agriculture to Planned Development, and 2) a preliminary plat to' subdivide the area into 8 single family lots and 5 multiple dwelling lots consisting of 40 dwelling units on the 5 lots. Action was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission to recommend approval of this application to the City Council. For additional • information on the item, refer to the Planning Consultant's report found on pages /6y through s For a copy of the minutes on this item, refer to page(s) Enclosed on pages and 17 is a memo and sketch relating to an apparent landlocked parcel that would result from the approval of this preliminary plat. Due to the fact that the result of this research indicates that the landlocked parcel would not be a buildable parcel, it does not create the concerns originally anticipated during the preliminary review. However, the Public Works Director and City Planner will be able to address this item in further detail if necessary. The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the preliminary plat entitled LeMay Lake Hills at its August 15 commission meeting. Commission members were concerned regarding the setback of the • homes from the lake and that adequate erosion control measures be taken during construction. After a further review of the plat, the Commission made the following recommendations: 1. The plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. 2. A trailway on Towerview Road and the proposed street to Pilot Knob Road be included. N 3. A trailway along Lone Oak Road from the proposed road to Pilot Knob be included. 4. That adequate erosion control measures be taken in construction and grading of this preliminary plat as well as home construc- tion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning to a Planned Development, and 2) a preliminary plat consisting of 8 single family lots and 40 apartment units proposed as LeMay Lake Hills. /0 C� -- CITY OF EAGAN -- SUBJECT: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat APPLICANT: Al Kempf LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant of Towerview Road & Pilot Knob Road EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE 0f REPORT Agricultural July 23, 1985 July 17, 1985 REPORTED BY: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted for a rezoning of an approximate 13.69 acre area from Agricultural to Planned Development. A second application has been submitted for a Preliminary Plat in order to subdivide the area into eight (8) single family lots and five (5) multiple dwelling lots. Each of the multiple dwelling lots would be developed with an "eightplex" for a.total of 40 multiple dwelling units on the five (5) lots. The preliminary plat also provides for a local residential street which would extend from Lone Oak Road on the north to Towerview Road on the south. ZONING AND LAND USE: The proposed rezoning from Agricultural to Planned Develop- ment - is consistent with Eagan's Comprehensive Plan in that this property is designated for Residential R -II development. This would permit three (3) to six (6) units per acre which would be a range of 41 to 82 dwelling units over this 13.69 acre parcel. •The developer is proposing 40 multiple dwelling units and eight (8) single family homes for a total of 48 units. This property would also be subject to the City's Shoreland Management Ordinance #77. It appears that the provisions of this Ordinance are met except for the minimum lot area requirements of 10,000 square feet per unit for waterfront multiple dwellings on "General Development Waters" as provided in Section 77.03 -of the above -referenced Ordi- nance. This matter will have to be reviewed with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as provided by the Ordinance. CODE COMPLIANCE: It appears that the preliminary plat complies with the minimum require- ments of Eagan City Codes with the exception of the Shoreland Ordinance as referenced above. �DY Planning Report - City of Eagan Subject: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Applicant: Al Kempf July 17, 1985 Reported by: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant Page 2 SITE PLANNING: The shape of this parcel and proximity to LeMay Lake and surrounding streets pose some development problems. Several development schemes have been sub- mitted for this property over the past several years. This proposal, titled "LeMay's Lake Development", appears to be well-designed. It provides for a public street through the property. It also provides single family homes across the street from those which currently exist on Towerview Road. It also provides a single family home adjacent to the existing home at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road. The remainder of this site would be developed with relatively small (eight unit) dwel- ling units backing upon Le May Lake. Some of the lots along Towerview Road would have double frontages which is not desirable, however, this cannot be avoided if a through street is to be provided. Also, the through street would parallel Pilot Knob Road for approximately 450 feet and would be at an elevation considerably below Pilot Knob Road. As such, a planting screen should be provided in addition to the change in elevation so that traffic along Pilot Knob Road is not confused by the adjacent traffic flow along the internal street. Also, it appears that the proposed parking areas on Lots #6 and #7 of Block #2 would not meet the minimum 20 foot setback requirement of the Eagan Zoning Ordinance. Either this would have to be redesigned or a Variance would have to be obtained from the City. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: CITY OF EAGAN LEMAY LAKE HILLS, PRELIMINARY PLAT AL KEMPF NW4 OF THE NW; OF SECT. 10, N. OF TOWERVIEW RD. A (AGRICULTURE) TO P.D. (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) JULY 23, 1985 JULY 18, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading as proposed by this developer • is feasible. However, it will require the construction of 600 ft. of retaining wall adjacent Pilot Knob Road. The retaining wall height varies but the northern portion is approximately 13 ft. high. Other aspects of this grading plan include a maximum of an 8% street grade off of Lone Oak Road. (Although this is not shown as such, the. developer did not show a 2% landing area' at Lone Oak Road. Incorporating this results in an 8% grade.) Also, several areas of 3 to 1 slopes are required to incorporate this grading plan. Although none of the above factors are in excess of City Codes, staff felt they are at least worth mentioning. The proposed grading plan will slightly alter the existing drainage pattern over this site. About two-thirds of this site will drain into the public_ street. Proposed catch basins at the street low point over the existing storm sewer outlet line from LeMay • Lake will collect this runoff. The remaing one-third will continue to drain into LeMay Lake. Therefore, it is important that the developer submits a detailed erosion control plan for review by staff so that erosion and sedimentation into LeMay Lake is kept to an absolute minimum. Because the trunk storm sewer outlet from LeMay Lake is in place, in addition to all downstream trunk storm sewer, this development will not require any further extension or upgrading of trunk storm sewer facilities. SANITARY SEWER: This development proposes to extend sanitary sewer from the existing 8" sanitary sewer line located about in the middle of this development. This is feasible because the existing sanitary sewer is of sufficient. depth and capacity to allow these extensions. Staff recommends that - sewer be extended to provide service to the existing house. PRELIMINARY PLAT LEMAY LAKE HILLS JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 This development will not require any upgrading or installation of new trunk sanitary sewer facilities. WATER MAIN: This development proposes to connect the existing 6" water main within Towerview Road and loop it through to connect to an existing 16" water main within Lone Oak Road. Both existing lines are of sufficient size and capacity to allow this looping. This development will not require any trunk -water main improvements. "- STREETS: Towerview Road, Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road border this development on its south, west and north, respectively. Towerview Road is designated as a City residential street. Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road are designated as major collector streets and under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Although the classification of Towerview Road is as a residential street, it is not up to City standards. As a condition of this proposed development, the upgrading of Towerview Road to City standards should occur. This will require the paving and installa- tion of concrete curb and gutter for on Towerview Road. The proposed public street connecting Towerview Road and Lone Oak Road shall be a residential street built to City standards. Because of the grade differences between Pilot Knob Road and the proposed internal public street, staff does not feel the close proximity of each will pose problems. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and • Towerview Road exist as highway easements. Staff proposesded- ication of right-of-way as follows: Street Pilot Knob Road Lone Oak Road Towerview Road Right -of -Way Width 55 ft. 60 ft. 30 ft. The developer of this area is proposing to dedicate a 50 ft. wide right-of-way for the internal street. Because this internal street is serving only this development, staff agrees with the developer proposal for the 50 ft. dedication. Staff will require easements over the sanitary sewer and water main not located, within public right-of-way. These easements must be a minimum of 30' in width. All other easements required shall be in accordance with City Code. /a5 PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEMAY LAKE HILLS JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 ASSESSMENT: Research into the assessment regarding this site indicate this site is still responsible for trunk area watermain and upgrading of trunk area storm sewer from residential to multiple rates. These are summarized in the following table. Est'd 1985 Description Qty Date Amount Trunk Area Watermain 8.64 Ac. (1) $1,190/Ac'. $10,280 Trunk Area Storm 376,670 sq. ft.(1) $0.013/sq. ft. (2) $4,900 Sewer Upgrading • • (1) Net Area (2) Difference between multiple & single family rates ($0.061-0.048) These assessments are due at the time of final platting at the rate in effect at that time. PRELIMINARY PLAT JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: - LEMAY LAKE HILLS 1) The developer will be responsible for constructing the necessary guardrail/handrail between the retaining wall and the bike path along Pilot Knob Road. 2) The sanitary sewer shall be extended northerly to provide service to the existing house. 3) The upgrading of Towerview Rd. shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 4) A 55 ft. half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Rd., a 60' half right-of-way for Lone Oak Rd., and a 30' half right-of-way for Toweverview Rd. shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5) A 30' width utility easement will be required over sanitary • sewer and watermain not located within public right-of-way. 6) This development shall be responsible for trunk area watermain and the upgrading of trunk area storm sewer assessments from single family to muti family at the rates in effect at the time of final plating. 7) All costs associated with this development regarding internal public improvements will be the sole responsibility of this development. 8) Park Dedication requirements shall be satisfied as recommended by the Eagan Park Commission and approved by the City Council. 9) The developer shall submit a detailed landscape plan providing for a solid screen for the approximate 450 foot area where the proposed internal street parallels Pilot Knob Rd. prior to the approval of the final plat. 10) The developer shall provide a name for the proposed internal street. 11) All provisions of Eagan's Shoreland Ordinance #77, including density, shall be met prior to the approval of the final plat. 12) The minimum setback requirements for parking areas shall be met prior to approval of the final plat. 13) The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee prior to the approval of the final plat by the City. 14) A detailed landscape plan for the multiple dwelling area shall be submitted to the City staff and approved prior to' the issuance of any building permits. 0 0 g749lNWcr Eiuxe EMlcxsox ==�__ a. ._.� YICXxECT9. IMC LEMAY'S LAKE BENELOPMENT i EAOAN, MINNESOTA. IIIAI :q 7:,,1' III u .a if q { -• Wluuuu: m. mvn n. CAMAY'S LAKEI MA i APAA'TME' gf VMt9 :Ad ' -v „ Y� I t!FF19a REdUIR b - {Mtl \ fU& PARKIN0 6H614 - {{w V I IIIAI :q 7:,,1' III u .a if q { -• Wluuuu: m. mvn n. CAMAY'S LAKEI 7—U fea RONBUN9A/ NRANN ENIOKBON AOONnE01O, INC. ' -v „ Y� I L�MAii°3 LAKE DEVELOPMENTLAW, MlWk�btAAl 7—U fea 9 0 0 NON0YN0A/ ANANN [RICN90H Y. u L��Ai LAIN HILLS ANCNITCCT®, INE "°`�"'""""' �' """`�'-• PRELIMINARY UTLITIES PLAN (MSUNSIIY ERK ICSEP.INC WG „._.�....w... ARCHCNI ER _ w� A�YO.M�WWi A�W� LEMAY LAK€ HU -5 PRELIMINARY GRAAINQ Pl-AN EAGANI MINNEEGTA 17-V 1 i4 L �17 Nw9m 19�V/ r -e 1 9994 P€ PRIPTIAN S� uM1T•� gnu ... n � I�� I l�) �yniillt•. .•IYT:`Na awu • LEMAY' S LAKE i 1 �� ir.eH I/rr. I � '719919Ii '7 t In\c \ \ ,BLOCK O,I.1I.oN 0 �i a i ir•nl 791r \ � 1 \\\ IRRIOR.R I ilnrn / UdI. 19/F 11 r• PII-RT-f<PiRR -i slit. I'Mix4.q lNffRINO 11APRNY, INC, — —I PRELIMINARY tiY RAT LtMAY RKY Fill-§ y. — ,« — —I 1- A 0 - -.1 1 .. -� I LEMATO t-AKE DMLOPMFNT:, I "EAGAN, -4 -re MINNFSOTA- - - -.1 1 .. -� I LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (OJvvuacre) R -II mixed re5idenlip106wl/mre) R-111 mixed residentia1612indlocre) R -IV multiple (•12nd/acre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial R&D researchfidevelopmenl COMMERCIAL LB limited business N8 neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P porks,quasl public E,M.F6.schools FEB. 198 CITY OF EAGAN A I H !VIEW . ACRES EFFLE ACRE A i 1 SeIFOOL RA PD K�Pa PARK" PF m t R D U ;n4 DIT ON RI�R-J4 P. R-3/, G� R-4 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE LI .0RW-- L V!YN rM ni c R< 4.) �e;�, ; j J sc P / LB s2-2 R-4 CSC I O'LEARY PARK PILOT OB R ---- CRd SR Dc !_ �. a,r F 1S7ATFS�k �(j1SlOC .� RAILS EAGANDAL \ is GB )AFARK APC Minutes July 23, 1985 9. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the standard engineering conditions. 10. The developer shall submit plan profiles of the utilities and streets to the City staff for review and approval. . 11. All lots shall meet R-1 requirements. 12. The planned development for Lexington South shall be amended to conform with the plat of Wedgwood 2nd addition and the density which is not used in the area of Wedgwood 2nd Addition shall not be shifted to the remainder of the planned development. All members voted in favor. • LeMAY LAKE HILLS - REZONING 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing concerning the application of Al Kempf for rezoning from A Agricultural to PD Planned Development, for property located in part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, north of Towerview Road and for preliminary plat approval of LeMay Lake Hills consisting of approximately 13.69 acres containing 8 single family lots and 40 apartment units in the same area. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report dated July 17, 1985. He stated that there have been neighborhood meetings with the developer but City staff were not aware of the concerns of the neighbors. Greg Hollenkamp, the architect, and Al Kempf, the applicant, were present. Mr. Hollenkamp stated that the townhouse units would be two bedrooms, the buildings would be two stories, there would be 8 units per building, that they would be rental units with the possibility of being converted to condominiums at a later time, and that the rental rate would probably be around $500.00, but that he is not sure. In • response to questions from the public, Mr. Kempf stated that the cost of the townhouses would be about $40.00 a square foot or about $40,000.00 per unit, that the vegetation by the lake would not be disturbed by the developer, that there would be 2 and 1/2 parking spaces per unit, one in the garage, one in front of the garage and 4 additional spaces for each building. Runkle stated that the parking provided would meet City Code. Mr. Kempf stated that the " cost of the single family lots would range from $25,000.00 to $40,000.00 and that they would be sold individually, that there would be an approximate 120 foot buffer between Towerview Road and the townhouses, and that the street intersecting Towerview Road would do so west of Quarry Road. A neighboring property owner stated that the road at the south part of the plat would hit Quarry Road at the middle of Wachtler's house, that there is concern about traffic in the area, and that it would be preferable to have the road come out closer to Pilot Knob Road.. Hall stated that there would be apace needed for stacking along Towerview Road, and Hefti stated that 200 feet of stacking would be a minimum requirement. One neighboring property owner stated that the corner of Quarry and Towerview is hard to see around in the winter, and that it would be better to have the intersecting road farther from that intersection. Another neighbor stated a concern about rental units in the development, the lack of any real concept for the single family units, the 10 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 possibility of many years delay before the single family units are sold or developed. Jerry- Rodgers, resident at 1335 Quarry, stated that the development is inconsistent with the neighborhood, the rental units would be cheap, and that the current houses are well kept and have values in the $100,000.00 range. , In response to questions from the commission, Hollenkamp stated that all single family lots meet ordinance requirements, that the single family lots will be sold to persons building houses on the lot, that there have been inquiries from the developers and individuals about lots in the area, and that the developer cannot afford to develop all of the subject property as single family because of the assessments and costs involved, and that each individual apartment unit would have a separate entrance onto a walkway area in the middle of the building. Wilkins raised questions concerning the retaining wall between the street and Pilot Knob Road, and the distance between the retaining wall and the sidewalk. Refti stated that there would be about 10 feet between the retaining wall and the sidewalk along Pilot Knob Road, and • Hollenkamp stated that it would be possible to include a stairway from the street to Pilot Knob Road to keep children from cutting across yards. In response to questions from the commission, Kempf stated that the street in the plat will be a public street, that if the apartments are sold as townhouses, there will be an association and that if they are not sold, the developer will manage the project. Runkle stated that further review of the proposal in relation to the shoreland ordinance would need to be done by the staff, especially as it relates to the density of the proposal, and that staff could also look at making the street line up with Quarry Lane or moving the street to the west. Kempf stated his desire to sell the townhouse units eventually. Wold stated his concern that the proposal appears to be in between being a rental development and development for sale, and that part of the development might be sold and part would remain rental property. Runkle suggested the possibility of requiring that there be an association when a certain percent of the units are sold. Wold suggested that covenants could be required on the single family lots to make them compatible with the neighborhood, especially • as this would relate to the square footage of the homes. Trygg agreed that covenants could be helpful, and Hall stated that this appeared to be the best development plan that had yet been proposed for this property. Wilkins moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application 6f Al Kempf to rezone from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) approximately 13.69 acres located in part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, north of Towerview Road, subject to the condition that all procedures in the Shoreland Ordinance shall be followed concerning the consideration of exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance by consultation with City staff and concerning the submission of the proposed planned development to the Department of Natural Resources for its review and approval, and as part of the same motion, Wilkins moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval.of LeMay Lake Hills, consisting of approximately 13.69 acres containing 8 single family lots and 40 apartment units in the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall be responsible for constructing the necessary guardrail/handrail between the retaining wall and the bike path along Pilot Knob Road. //I 11 U • APC Minutes July 23, 1985 2. The sanitary sewer shall be extended northerly to provide service to the existing house. 3. The upgrading of Towerview Road shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 4. A 55 foot half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road, a 60 foot half right- of-way for Lone Oak Road, and a 30 foot half right-of-way for Towerview Road shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5. A 30 foot width utility easement shall be granted over sanitary sewer and watermain not located within public right -off -way. 6. This development shall be responsible for trunk area watermain and the upgrading of trunk area storm sewer assessments from single family to multi- family at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 7. All costs associated with this development regarding internal public improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 8. Park dedication requirements shall be satisfied as recommended by the Eagan Park Commission and approved by the City Council. 9. The developer shall submit for staff approval a detailed landscape plan providing for a solid screen for the approximate 450 foot area where the proposed internal street parallels Pilot Knob Road prior to the approval of the final plat, and a landscape bond shall be established by City staff and provided by the developer at time of staff review. 10. The developer shall provide a name for the proposed internal street. 11. All provisions of Eagan's Shoreland Ordinance including density shall be met prior to the approval of the final plat. 12. The minimum setback requirements for parking areas shall be met prior to approval of the final plat. 13. The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee, prior to the approval of the final plat by the City. 14. A detailed landscape plan for the multiple dwelling area shall be submitted to the City staff and approved prior to the issuance of any building permits. 15. The developer shall submit covenants for review and approval by City staff for the lots on Towerview Drive to insure compatibility of use and design with the homes currently existing on Towerview Drive. 16. The developer shall establish a homeowners association for the townhome units for review and approval by City staff prior to the sale of any units to separate owners. Ilk 12 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 17. City staff, the developer and neighbors shall study and discuss the feasibility of moving the road to the east or west at its intersection with Towerview Road and the location of the' road shall be established as recommended by City staff, prior to the approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. McCrea stated that she believes that the Department of Natural Resources should review the density of the proposal before the City approves it. Voting in favor of the motion were Wilkins, Hall and Wold; voting against were Trygg and McCrea; and abstaining was Harrison. The motion passed. SUN CLIFF Chairman Hall convened thebl Robert Carlson for preliminary pl consisting of 13.5 acres and contai i with a total of 48 units in part f quarter of Section 29. Dale Runk the staff report of July 17, 1985 and stated that Patrick Hoffman and stated that there would be no shared of them would be for sale, that there price from approximately $60,000.00 will be sixteen 1 1/2 bedroom units w units with 1,096 square feet, and baths and 1,500 square feet. He st each have 1,064 square feet and there the buildings. - PRELIMINARY PLAT " c hearing regarding the 3ipplication of t approval of Sun CliffThird Addition, g 5 duplex lots and 4 tiple buildings • the northwest quaer and northeast introduced the app cation and reviewed The developer, R ert Carlson, appeared uck Winden were lso present. Carlson hallways in t multiple units, that all will be thrO types of models ranging in to approxyhately $100,000.00, that there h 950 uare feet, sixteen 2 -bedroom xtee 2 -bedroom plus den units with 3 ed at the double bungalow units would o d be good sound proofing in all of Jay Tscherne, a neighboring ow r on the east aide of Blackhawk Road, appeared and stated that he had b n as ured by City staff that there would no further access on Blackhawk Road ear C unty Road 30, that the proposed access • would come out very clo:en t his hom and that traffic would face his house directly. Jim Ashworth, ae'ghboring sident at 4235 Blackhawk Road stated that the proposed access ag Blackhawk Road cuts across the bike path, that there could very well b flooding in he area, as his neighboring property, just to the south, has b n flooded, tha trees around the ponding area could be lost, ana [hat aesth ically, the pr posal looks all right. Rich Hefti stated that he was not at the hearing relating to the assessments and was therefore unaware of omments that might ve been made by City staff relating to the access. He s ted that the access ould need to be 300 feet from the a intersection in ord r to have proper eta king distance from County Road 30. Runkle stated Cha the road could be shi ted somewhat. Ashworth stated that Tom Colbert and Bob Rosene had stated that here would be no more accesses in that area and that all accesses from that. property would come off of Beaver Dam Road. Tscherne stated that it is almost.impossible to cross County Road #30 and Blackhawk, and Refti stated that the County had assured him that a 4 - way stop at that intersection would be permanent until it is signalized, within the next five years. 13 MEMO TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: AUGUST 15, 1985 SUBJECT: LE MAY LAKE HILLS PRELIMINARY PLAT As a result of miscommunication between the Planning and Engineering Departments during the review of this preliminary plat, the Planning Commission was not made aware of the "fact that parcel 011-28 is a landlocked parcel with no relief provided by this proposed development. Attached is a sketch as to how this parcel relates to this proposed development and the Tara Court located north • and east of this landlocked parcel. Also shown is the amount of this parcel that LeMay's Lake incorporates. As you can see, the 75' setback from LeMay's Lake does not leave this parcel with much area to develop, approximately 4,000 S.F. In a related matter regarding this development, I met with several residents along Towerview Rd on Tuesday, August 13, 1985, with respect to the access from this development onto Towerview Rd. I indicated to these people that the Engineering Department feels that two alternatives are feasible. In order of preference, the first being locating the proposed public street intersection near Quarry La. A small offset would exist, however, I do not believe it would cause any problems. The second feasible access point would be between 150' and 200' east of Pilot Knob Rd. This location would be approximately directly across from the west property line of the Lunka Addition. This is not feasible • with the grading plan as submitted by the developer because the street grades would be in excess of 10%. In contrast, the street grade coming up to Towerview Rd, as proposed, is approximately 58. If Council approves of this development layout, then the only feasible access to Towerview Rd is near the Quarry La intersection with Towerview Rd. If I can be of assistance to you regarding any info contained in this memo, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Rich Heft RH:jbd CC: Dale Runkle, City Planner enclosure 5 Z NORTH AL 1'-W JESCRIPT ON . LEMAY'S LAKE MI2 • • �•, �, DRAINAGE EASEMENT - r+ 6].100 SO T. �'I., .•s ,. 111 1 A BLOCK --------------- f i= 2 11 YPtl ifL •• \ Ij I 0 6.1900 MIT 1118 I 54500 W r1. 1 I 56.679 SQTT. a 5 9.,625 SQR 4 Ci SsjT \ i •�� \�— II 1 i �I \ Wi \r \ � BLOCK 3 � II .emrrL II J� I� I IROFOSED Ij j STREET uI i Y. m orr PILOT KNOB ROAD--- z I6OQ SQ II / OUARRY_LN 1 T 29,25 MIT. ..AGO SQIL I �••em 1 � 2 S• .;315 SQ IT. 9 14.735 SQ. IT. 0 m / I• x6,1x5 23.6x9 SQ IT, . A. IDIAE6A3 I I_ _, I I PRELIMINARY PMT 6RRQ IQ3V.M.3 OF � Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUN CLIFF 3RD ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat for Sun Cliff 3rd Addition Consisting of 13.5 Acres Containing 5 Duplex Lots and 4 12 -Unit Multiple Buildings -- A public hearing was held for the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider a pre- liminary plat for Sun Cliff 3rd Addition that provides platting for an approximate 13.5 acre area. The developer is proposing five duplex lots and four townhome multiple dwelling buildings over the remainder of the property. The Advisory Planning Commis- sion is recommending approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the City's Planning Consultant's report found on pages J -y3 through /3y For action that was • taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to page(s) • The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the Sun Cliff 3rd Addition and noted that it was part of the Eagan Hills West Planned Unit Development. It was noted that this development has previously made a parkland dedication. The Commission noted that trailways were completed with other developments within the area and, therefore, no recommendation for additional parks or trails dedication was made. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Sun Cliff 3rd Addition as presented. /L.), V -- CITY OF EAGAN -- SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Sun Cliff Third Addition APPLICANT: Patrick Hoffman and Bob Carlson LOCATION: Southwest Quadrant of Blackhawk Road & Diffley Road Part of Eagan Hills West Planned Development EXISTING: ZONING: R-4 Planned Development DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: July 17, 1985 • REPORTED BY. John S. Voss, Planning Consultant APPLICATION SUMMARY: The preliminary plat - Sun Cliff Third Addition - would provide for the platting of an approximate 13.5 acre area. The developer proposes five (5) double bungalow lots along Deer Hills Trail and four (4) townhome multiple dwelling buildings over the remainder of the property. Each of these townhome buildings would be on a separate lot and each would provide for twelve (12) dwelling units fora total of 48 multiple dwelling units. No public street dedication would be required in that the public streets for this property already exist in the area. The developer would provide for an internal private drive to serve the multiple dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: The property was originally zoned Multiple R-4 several years ago and was included in the Eagan Hills West Planned Development in 1978. Under the Planned Development Agreement, the property is designated for Medium Density with a range of • nine (9) to twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The proposed development would average 4.3 units per acre for this 13.5 acre area. Therefore, the proposed density would be below that allowed under the Planned Development Agreement. Also, this area is designa- ted R -III in Eagan's Comprehensive Plan which would provide for six (6) to twelve (12) units per acre. CODE COMPLIANCE: It appears that the proposed multiple dwelling development would meet the minimum requirements of City Ordinances. The five double bungalows, along Deer Hills Trail, would not meet the normal R-2 District requirements for two-family dwellings. Normally, a minimum one -hundred foot (100') width and 15,000 square foot area would be provided where four (4) of the proposed lots are approxnnately 85 feet wide and the five lots range in area from 10,560 square feet to 14,400 square feet. Deviations from the normal R-2 requirements can be provided in that this property is zoned R-4 _ Planned Development - and the overall density is below that permitted by the Planned Development Agreement, The proposed two-family lots would appear capable of accommodating the double bungalow units that are proposed for the property and the proposed units would meet the minimum setback requirements. 17,3 Planning Report - City of Eagan Subject: Preliminary Plat - Sun Cliff Third Addition Applicant: Patrick Hoffman and Bob Carlson Date: July 17, 1985 Reported by: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant Page 2 SITE PLANNING: The property appears to be well-designed and in keeping with develop- ment that exists in the area. The developer proposes a four -stall garage that would be separated from the multiple dwelling units by approximately 120 feet near the intersection of Beaver Dam Road and Diffley Road. It is expected that these spaces would be used by persons living in the multiple dwelling units or by the home owner's association. The building does not appear to pose a problem, but its location, away from the main structures, is somewhat unusual. The property is encumbered by a 70 foot wide gas easement and a ponding area which, to a large degree, accounts for the low density. • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SUNCLIFF 3RD ADD APPLICANT: ROBERT CARLSON & PATRICK HOFFMAN LOCATION: SW; OF BLACKHAWK RD & DIFFLEY RD, PART OF EAGAN HILLS WEST P.D. EXISTING ZONING: R-4, MULTIPLE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT • UTILITIES & DRAINAGE: There is sanitary sewer, water & storm sewer service available to serve this development. The City will require an updated drainage & storm sewer plan with contours at 2' intervals indicating how this property will drain and shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the City for approval. The storm water runoff from this development is proposed to drain into Pond AP -7 which is located on the souther- ly part of this development. A storm sewer outlet pipe shall be constructed to Pond AP -7 and the outlet shall be constructed to the 889.5' elevation. The City will require a drainage and utility easement for Pond AP -7 to encompass the property below the 893.9 elevation in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. STREETS: Access to this proposed plat is by Blackhawk Rd from the east & Beaver Dam Rd from the West. • EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The City will require utility & drainage easements ten (101) feet in width adjoining all streets and five (5') feet in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. The City will require utility easements a minimum of twenty (201) feet in width for all public utilities not constructed within the street right-of-way. This item will be reviewed again when the utility plans for this subdivision have been submitted along with the final plat. The City will require that easements be obtained from Northern_ Natural Gas Co. where utilities cross said Northern Natural Gas easements or a right of entry document be obtained in order for the City to maintain City utilities crossing said natural gas easement. EROSION CONTROL & GRADING PLAN: The developer shall submit an erosion and sediment control plan to the City for review and approval. The City will require an enviro filter fence along Pond AP -7 to the south to prevent silt and debris from entering into the -storm drainage system. The developer shall submit an updated grading & drainage plan indicating the existing and proposed contours at 2' intervals with drainage arrows indicating how this property will drain. 17,5 ENGINEERING REPORT - SUNCLIFF 3RD ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2. ASSESSMENTS: In reviewing the assessments levied over this proposed development which consists of parcels 014-09 & 015-26 of Section 29, it was not determined if -all, the trunk related assessments have been levied to include the upgrading from the single family rate to the multi -family rate. Some further study will be required to make this determination. CONDITIONS: 1. The park dedication requirements of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be current prior to the approval_ of the final plat. 2. The smaller -sized double bungalow lots (Lots #1 through #5 of Block 1) shall be approved through the Planned Development with the understanding that no setback variances shall be granted and the normal setback requirements of the R-2 District shall be observed. • 3. The proposed four -stall garage shall be designed of the same exterior material as the multiple dwelling buildings. 4. Private Driveway and Parking Requirements: (See Engineer's Report) 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the double bungalow lots and the multiple dwelling lots prior to approval of the final plat. 6. The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee prior to the approval of the final plat. 7. All of the provisions of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be in compliance prior to the approval of the final plat. 8. Sidewalks shall be provided as required by the City Council. • 9. A landscaped area/berm shall be provided where the private driveway parallels County Road #30. 10. The developer shall furnish the City the necessary easements and/ or permanent right of entry document for the maintenance of utilities that cross the Northern Natural Gas pipeline. 11. A detailed grading, drainage & erosion & sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City for review & approval by City Staff. 12. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility & drainage easements as required by the City Staff. 13. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility & drainage easement for Pond AP -7 to encompass the required area below the 893.9 elevation in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. • • CONDITIONS (Continued) July 23, 1985 PAGE 3. 14. All costs for internal utilities & streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 15. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the Standard Engineering Conditions. 16. The City will require plan profiles of the utilities & streets to be submitted to the City for review & approval. 17. The private streets for this development shall be constructed to a minimum of 28' wide. "'OTA 00 0UN y ) LAT I A H—LI f7 A a 8 Jo) 70p- /� "P PKI CLIFtM% 7�9 ' aza z PI 75 - GEI ...(((t RA ' 4. .:.... I' Intl • ,I�'CJ J ,// _ I - I I• "• 6 / Ind.., cCMMERCIAL J' / r! RI �. .• PLANNED DEVELOPMENT r,( t•;� r i1Ilrx( � Intl ••// I I(7I LB _ RIC. pEEI l0 'Intl i•., itl :t RI LLLCC:::JJJJJ fin;• GB144, Ina ? Fffi(jJRN RVI //..� c: R.I p / ❑• .: Intl N .-. I Intl ' . NEI' LB R11 'c.� LB RII RJI,: CSC. I / i � P �Ru if .. Ind �/ V'Ibll .R ..I!, Ind �•' . ,•� � RIII 'xr i � fl -I nR.l P a ..F IG RI Ind � N i !VVV .�th> .,..•I _.T.I R -II t _ ',l , . n P I•' 313 IIS,^.; If 11 E .. tQf I i LB E — ...... R -I R.111 �t",l al' CSCIGBI R R'lll. _I�,y' RIII�RB 1 01;T§ �•//�Y-rRI ILB. / 1 7, .R- •. : ' D LB �'I�`I l RI R� P a .:: L` u R -1 R-11 ,,F /r�I P IPI R'll t 1 u j V- rrff .I R -II ♦.I R 1' R.II - P ,( - _-l- .e,i R ll R -II RII !I LJ .P P .r•.. �•..x "Ill `C✓ fs' I ___ r • nasu,ouNT •` �I I� alro:E vnLLEr r , 1. LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R -I single family (03u umre) R -II mixed re5idential(36,"UCCre) R -III mixed residential V1 tyre) R -N multiple (•12nd/acre) INDUSTRIAL Ind mtlustrial R&D research&development COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB Mgnbornood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks.guosi public E,M IG. schools FEB. 1981 CITY OF EAGAN \I Prollmftry Plat of: SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION 'or A. M. C. Development Corporation A Advance Developer, inc.. ic,ml, it I ROA, A MIS 1 C x J 7 - ... . .. 5 _gin,..., fyl 0 FCOUNTT I ROAD Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan �\ of: SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION for: RMC: Development Corporation B Advance Developers, Inc. N w W N wn/Y.r p4n G4.a YY W W.Y w GNB. rill �nY N••YM Mir• - n.VO BA as •A -5r •-64 SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan �v PUBLIC STORM SEWER $ WORKS DFPGDT11AC&1 11AAnTr�.� _ FIG. * y aPProved:I s Plate and #: APC Minutes July 23, 1985 17. City staff, the developer and neighbors shall study and discuss the feasibility of moving the road to the east or west at its intersection with Towerview Road and the location of the" .road shall be established as recommended by City staff, prior to the approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. McCrea stated that she believes that the Department of Natural Resources should review the density of the proposal before the City approves it. Voting in favor of the motion were Wilkins, Hall and Wold; voting against were Trygg and McCrea; and abstaining was Harrison. The motion passed. SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman,Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Robert Carlson for preliminary plat approval of Sun Cliff Third Addition, • consisting of 13.5 acres and containing 5 duplex lots and 4 multiple buildings with a total of 48 units in part of the northwest quarter and northeast quarter of Section 29. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 17, 1985. The developer, Robert Carlson, appeared and stated that Patrick Hoffman and Chuck Winaen were also present. Carlson stated that there would be no shared hallways in the multiple units, that all of them would be for sale, that there will be three types of models ranging in price from approximately $60,000.00 to approximately $100,000.00, that there will be sixteen 1 1/2 bedroom units with 950 square feet, sixteen 2 -bedroom units with 1,096 square feet, and sixteen 2 -bedroom plus den units with 3 baths and 1,500 square feet. He stated that the double bungalow units would each have 1,064 square feet ana there would be good sound proofing in all of the buildings. Jay Tscherne, a neighboring owner on the east side of Blackhawk Road, appeared and stated that he had been assured by City staff that there would no • further access on Blackhawk Road near County Road 30, that the proposed access would come out very close to his home and that traffic would face his house directly. Jim Ashworth, a neighboring resident at 4235 Blackhawk Road stated that the proposed access along Blackhawk Road cuts across the bike path, that there could very well be flooding in the area, as his neighboring property, just to the south, has been flooded, that trees around the ponding area could be lost, ana [hat aesthetically, the proposal looks all right. Rich Hefti stated that he was not at the hearings relating to the assessments and was therefore unaware of comments that might have been made by City staff relating to the access. He stated that the access would need to be 300 feet from the intersection in order to have proper stacking distance from County Road 30. Runkle stated that the road could be shifted somewhat. Ashworth stated that Tom Colbert and Bob Rosene had stated that there would be no more accesses in that area and that all accesses from that property would come off of Beaver Dam Road. Tscherne stated that it is almost impossible to cross County Road #30 and Blackhawk, and Hefti stated that the County had assured him that a 4 - way stop at that intersection would be permanent until it is signalized, within the next five years. /33 13 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 Pat Hoffman appeared on behalf of the developer and stated that it had never been proposed that the only access for this area would be off of Beaver Dam Road, and that the developer had been assessed for the improvements along Blackhawk Road. He stated that the developer had discussed with Jerry Bourden of the Consulting Engineer's office, the possible location of the road to the north of the Ashworth property. Hefti stated that there is a pond outlet in place to control the height of the pond. Carlson stated that the foliage around the pond would not be disturbed and that the area to the north of the Ashworth property would be landscaped. Winden stated that the access road is 300 feet south of the centerline of County Road #30 and that the two driveways on the east side of Blackhawk Road are 125 feet south of the centerline and 400 feet south of the centerline, so that the. access is in between the two driveways. Hall stated that it would be appropriate to have staff look at those issues before the hearing before the City Council. Trygg asked what the developer would do if there is no access along Blackhawk Road and Carlson stated that the access would be necessary for safety and convenience, since the road would be too long for a cul-de-sac, and that only the two east buildings would probably use the access from Blackhawk Road, that two homeowners associations would be established, one for the double bungalows and one for the multiple units. McCrea stated that with the 4 -way stop at Blackhawk Road, a lot more traffic would go that route. Wilkins stated that it would be necessary to provide for landscaping to avoid disturbing neighbors with headlights. Harrison stated that the application should not be approved until it is known what statements City staff made concerning the access on Pilot Knob Road. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the public hearing until the August 27, 1985 meeting of the Advisory Planning Commission. Wold stated his belief that the question concerning the statement could be resolved prior to the City Council meeting without holding up the Planning Commission's determination, and that it would be better to have a condition on that aspect. Voting in favor of the motion were Harrison and Wilkins; voting against were Trygg, McCrea and Wold; and abstaining was the chair. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval of Sun Cliff Third Addition, consisting of 13.5 acres and containing 5 duplex lots and 4 multiple buildings with 48 units, in part of the northwest quarter and the northeast quarter of Section 29, subject to the following conditions: 1. The park dedication requirements of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be current prior to the approval of the final plat. 2. The smaller -sized double bungalow lots (Lots 1 through 5 of Block 1) shall be approved through the Planned Development with the understanding that no setback variances shall be granted and the normal setback requirements of the R-2 District shall be observed. 3. The proposed four -stall garage shall be designed of the same exterior material as the multiple dwelling buildings. 14 • • APC Minutes July 23, 1985 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the double bungalow lots and the multiple dwelling lots prior to approval of the final plat. 5. The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee prior to the approval of the final plat. 6. All of the provisions of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be in compliance prior to the approval of the final plat. 7. Sidewalks shall be provided as required by the City Council. 8. A landscaped area/berm shall be provided where the private driveway parallels County Road #30 to avoid disturbing neighbors with headlights, and a landscape plan providing for such a berm shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to final plat approval. • 9. The developer shall furnish the City with the necessary easements and/or permanent right -of -entry document for the maintenance of utilities that cross the Northern Natural Gas pipeline. 10. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by City staff. 11. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility and drainage easements as required by the City staff. 12. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility and drainage easement for Pond AP -7 to encompass the required area below the 893.9 elevation in accoraance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan. 13. All costs for internal utilities and streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development. • 14. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the Standard Engineering Conditions. 15. The developer shall submit to the City staff for review and approval planned profiles of the utilities and streets. 16. The private streets for this development shall be constructed to a minimum of 28 feet wide. 17. City staff shall determine if the City made a commitment to residents concerning no access on Blackhawk Road, and if so a determination should be made as to whether the commitment should be honored. 18. Homeowner's Association documents shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff prior to final plat approval. 19. Eagan Hills West Planned Development shall be amended at the Sun Cliff Third Addition area to be in conformity with Sun Cliff Third Addition and density not used by Sun Cliff Third Addition shall not be shifted to other parts of the Planned Development. 15 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 Voting in favor were McCrea; Wold, and Trygg; voting against were Wilkins and Harrison; and abstaining was the Chair. 'The motion passed. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded he motion'Go' adjourn the meeting at 11:10 p.m. All members voted in favor. It waa,noted that matters heard at this meeting would be reviewed by the Cit Coun.Zl on August 20. The Planning Commission Can American proposal and it without further hearing. /3,C discussed administrative changes on the eed to allow such administrative changes 1 16 Secretary - APC BS 0 • • • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven WINE & BEER LICENSE/HONG WONG RESTAURANT H. Wine & Beer License for Hong Wong Restaurant, Cedar Cliff Shopping Center -- An application was submitted by Linda Wong requesting a beer and wine license for the Hong Wong Restaurant located at Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. The Wongs are residents of the community and plan to open the restaurant around September 1. The Eagan Police Department has reviewed the application and has no reason to recommend denial. The Cedar Cliff 1st Addition Shopping Center complex received approval at the May 1, 1984, City Council meeting. At that meeting, Mr. Durning, representing the developers for the shopping center, stated "he would agree that there would be no 24-hour operation, that the restaurant is proposed to be open from 6:00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M. with the understanding that there would be no request for liquor license in the commercial area in the future". After reviewing the official City Council minutes that list all conditions of approval, there is no condition restricting the sale of liquor whether intoxicating or non -intoxicating within the commercial area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a wine and beer license for Hong Wong Restaurant at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. X37 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-eight FINAL RESOLUTION/HOUSING BONDS - FOREST RIDGE ADDITION I. Final Resolution for Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bonds for Forest Ridge Addition -- A letter of transmittal, copies of the preliminary statement and final resolutions have all been received and reviewed by City staff regarding the final resolution for the Forest Ridge project. This project is located north of Duckwood Drive adjacent to the future alignment of Denmark and consists of 252 multi -family units. The developer is Dan Gustafson under the name of the Forest Ridge Partnership. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final resolution for multi -family housing revenue bonds for Forest Ridge Addition in the amount of $10,960,000. • lad Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Tweinty-nine LA FONDA DE ACEBO LIQUOR LICENSE J. La Fonda De Acebo Liquor License -- During the spring of 1985, La Fonda de Acebo Restaurant was informed by the City of Eagan that a resident manager was required to hold the liquor license due to the fact La Fonda de Acebo is an out-of-state • corporation. Mr. James Geoglerius was hired and designated as the manager of the restaurant and the license application was granted by the City. The City has been notified by Mr. Geoglerius that he was terminated as the instate/resident manager late in the month of July. The City Administrator sent a .certified letter to La Fonda de Acebo advising the corporation that a new manager must be appointed and approved by the City Council according to Minnesota statutes and applicable Eagan liquor ordinances. The City has received an application from Richard Spear, a resident of Bloomington, who is now the resident manager for the La Fonda de Acebo Restaurant. A copy of Mr. Spear's personal information is enclosed without page number for each City Councilmember to review. The Police Department has performed a check on the new applicant and finds no reason to recommend denial of the licence. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny • granting a liquor license to La Fonda de Acebo with Mr. Richard Spear as the instate resident manager. X39 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirty RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PK A. Contract 85-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedar Industrial Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) -- On Friday, August 9, sealed bids were publicly opened for the construction of the trunk storm sewer through the Cedar Industrial Park along with street improve- ments ofBla khawk Road from T.H. 13 to Comanche Road. Enclosed on page- /c/-1 is a tabulation of all bids received. The alternate bid was requested for consideration of removal of the railroad tracks along the Minnesota River Valley for the 84" storm sewer crossing in lieu of having to jack the storm sewer pipe underneath without disturbing the railroad operations. Due to the fact that all alternate bids resulted in an increase in the base bid, the staff is recommending that the alternate not be considered. This bid tabulation shows that the low bid was 21% below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 19, 1985. Based on these favorable bids, it is recommended that the Council award the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 85-5 (Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm sewer- and streets) and award the contract to the apparent low bidder, ARI Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $874,192.40. 1,40 • • CITY CONTRACT NO. 85-5 CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK STORM SEWER b"STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 428 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Fridav, Aug, 9, 1985 ALTERNATE BID ADD DEDUCT 23,000.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 8,720.00 50.000.00 20,000.00 15,430.00 34,300.00 10,100.00 12 nnn nn Engineer's Estimate - - - - - - - - - - - $1,100,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Estimate - - - - -20.5% Feasibility Report Estimate - - - - - - - $1,105,465.00 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Estimate -21.08 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1.. ARI Contracting 874,192.40 • 2. Barbarossa & Sons 916,175.00 3. Richard Knutson 921,069.15 4. L & G Rehbein 924,265.40 5. Lametti & Sons 946.000.00 6. Northdale Construction 953,075.70 7. Arcon Construction 953,656.80 8. Orfei & Sons 986,768.71 9. Progressive Contractors 1,129,140.40 10. Johnson Bros. 1.162.807.00 11. Austin P. Keller Const. 1-177 029.00 12. Lake Area Utility 1. 919.R56_90 • 13. M. Danner Trucking No Bid 14. S.J. Louis Construction No Bid 15. Lund Asphalt No Bid 16. Encon Utilities No Did 17. Winter Construction NO Bid 18. Alexander Construction No Bid. 19. Brown & Cris No Bia ALTERNATE BID ADD DEDUCT 23,000.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 8,720.00 50.000.00 20,000.00 15,430.00 34,300.00 10,100.00 12 nnn nn Engineer's Estimate - - - - - - - - - - - $1,100,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Estimate - - - - -20.5% Feasibility Report Estimate - - - - - - - $1,105,465.00 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Estimate -21.08 • Pi Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-one RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/LEXINGTON SQ 2ND ADDN B. Contract 85-20, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Square 2nd Addition - Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer) -- Sealed bids were publicly opened on Tuesday, August 13, for the installation of trunk sanitary and storm sewer through the Lexington Square Addition east of Lexi ton Avenue and south of Wescott Road. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received which shows that the low bid was 358 below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 7, 1985. Due to the favorable bids received, it is recom- mended that the Council award the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS Contract 85-20 (Lexington Square and storm sewer) and award the bidder, Enebak Construction, Inc., I�� ITEM: To receive the bids for 2nd Addition - trunk sanitary contract to the apparent low in the amount of $418,267.25. Our File No. 49343 CITY C (INGTON .Mr, STORM C NO. 85-2 i 2nd ADDL TARY AND MPROVEMENI EAGAN, MINNESOTA Feasibility Report Estimate 643;400.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -- 625,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Report -33.1 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Est. -35.0 mss BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D,S.T. BID DATE: Tuesday, Aug. 13. 1985 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Enebak Construction 418.267.25 2. Arcon Construction 4323819,40 i3. Lametti and Sons 494,000.00 4, Northdale Construction 521,662.00 5. Richard Knutson 540,399.05 6. M. Danner Trucking 550,914.00 7. Progressive Contracting 560,837.00 8. Barbarossa and Sons 561,050.00 9. Encon Utilities 5_64,141.50 10. L and G Rehbein 567,086.25 11. Brown and Cris 58 12. Lake Area Utility 6.00 SRA 157.00 13. ARI Contracting • 14. Orfei and Sons 607 819.09 619.926.81 13- S.J. Louis Construction 655,263.75 16. G.L. Contracting _672,550.75 17. Nodland Associates 787,720.00 18. Alexander Construction No Bid 19. Johnson Brothers No Bid 20. Winter Construction No Bid 21. Marmon Contracting No Bid 22. S.H. Hentges No Bid Feasibility Report Estimate 643;400.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -- 625,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Report -33.1 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Est. -35.0 mss MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 16, 1985 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE COMMAND BUS The command bus will be available for City Council touring at 6:00 P.M. prior to the City Council meeting on Tuesday. I informed both Fire Chief Childers and Chief of Police Berthe that members of the City Council would try and make it to the Municipal Building at approximately 6:15 for a brief inspection of the bus. SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT • The City Administrator needs to know which members of the City Council wish to play on the City Hall Softball Team which will be competing in the City softball tournament on Saturday, August 24. For additional information regarding the City Picnic/Softball Tournament, please refer to page LV -6-. SOUTH AREA TOWN MEETING Please mark your calendars for the South Area Town Meeting which is scheduled for August 22. The social hour begins at 6:00 p.m. with dinner at 7:00 and the location is the Southview Country Club in West St. Paul. NOISE COMPLAINT/GOPHER SMELTING • At the last City Council meeting, both Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Wachter expressed concerns regarding a noise complaint that was received from neighbors adjacent to the Gopher Smelting plant. This item has been reviewed by the Eagan Police Department and the faulty equipment has been repaired to the City's satis- faction. Please review the memorandum from Sergeant Stevenson found on page Zaj— . CITYWIDE CLEANUP A letter was received from Beermann Services suggesting a City cleanup for the City of Eagan. This is a form letter. Apparently, Beermann Services are proposing a fall cleanup in a number of communities. If there is any interest on the part of the City Council, this item would need to be coordinated as oon as possible. For a copy of the letter, please refer to page -f-i - PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE Meetings have been held on a weekly basis with Jack Boarman and Associates regarding the remodeling and addition to the Public Works Garage. Last Thursday, August 15, a Public Works Committee meeting was held to review the alternative plans and Informative Memo August 16, 1985 Page Two cost estimates for the proposed remodeling and addition. Direction was given to Jack Boarman to prepare 8#" x 11" reductions and cost estimates along with a general discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of each plan for distribution with the budget material late next week. City Councilmember Wachter, Chairman of the Public Works Committee, and the City Administrator would like to ask the City Council to begin the special budget workshop meeting on August 27 at 6:30 p.m., allowing time for Jack Boarman to review the information that will be distributed in advance to the City Council. The City is at a critical point where Council direction is necessary before staff and the architects can continue with the project. FALSE ADVERTISING QUESTION • There was a question raised regarding false advertising as it relates to the southeast quadrant of the Galaxy Road/Cliff Road intersection. The City's sign inspector, Mr. Elmer Borgschatz, has reviewed the question as raised by City Councilmember Wachter at a recent Council meeting. Enclosed on page is a copy of his memorandum and response. LEO MURPHY Our former mayor, Leo Murphy, had a heart attack and is being treated at the Fairview Ridges Hospital. He appears to be re- covering quite well and will be home either this weekend or next week. The City Administrator has contacted his wife to express our concerns on behalf of the City Council. CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM • A rather lengthy memorandum is enclosed regarding the City com- posting program. The Director of Parks and Recreation is asking for review of the memorandum which contains a program for City composting. If the program is acceptable to the City Council, information needs to be distributed as a part of the City news- letter. P} ease refer to the memorandum found on pages /Sb ,/ through , If time permits, as a part of Department Head Business, the Director of Parks & Recreation will be present to field any questions. s/Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 15 o m iv. CITY PICNIC/SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT SATURDAY, AUGUST 249 1985 The City Hall staff will again attempt to field a team for the City's inter -departmental softball tourna- ment scheduled for Saturday, August 24. As an attempt is being made this year to place more emphasis on this being a family picnic day for all employees, the first softball games are scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. A break in the ame schedule will occur at 11:00 a.m., at which time parent child -type activities will..take place, .followed by the pot -luck meal at noon. The softball,games will resume at 1:30 p.m. •I will again coordinate the Cityhall team effort this year (unless somebody else would like to do it), but I need to know how many people are interested in participating, and will actually show up for the games. Please let me know as soon as possible if you are interested in being on the City Hall softball team for this event. Ken Damlo l P.S. At the organizational meeting, job assignments were made to ensure the success of this event. The City Hall team's assignment is to cook the hotdogs for the noon picnic. Food,& facilities to be provided) Note: The opponent in the 8:30 a.m, game is the *team from the Park Dept = (" NIL - .3, ii 1 T � _ r Ise } i ,• _ — _ _ r ` F---- t � 11,( �r .0 �. . . w I h '✓ r J r. YtJt r i f 4 /',� Jy a r t+. 11 !✓- r - r 1a.-. r r t l . S .. } '3 ., tom[ rl f ." tt . ' � ::f 'G t . /1 t = + {rt\ l..-`l+r " yt. �1- � j � .• F t I ,v. Wya r. ., tJ s � r• i. L~' 1 / .+tY t � �.I +� t. y� ., r� q� t police department OF 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 August 7, 1985 TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator. FROM: Sgt. John Stevenson SUBJECT: NOISE COMPLAINT - GOPHER SMELTING JAY M. BERTHE PATRICK J. GEAGAN •dnlelMnn ns , KENNETH 0.A ZMANN opnll M,Gpwn On 8/2/85 at approximately 2116 hrs „ I received a noise complaint from Mayor Blomquist. The Mayor stated that she had received a complaint from a citizen on Chapel Lane that there was a very loud, annoying noise emanating from Gopher Smelting. I attempted to contact John Tapper from Gopher but was unsuccessful. I was able to contact the foreman, Mike Arneson. Mr. Arneson was not aware of any loud noise but he said that he would investigate it imme- diately. On 8/7/85 I spoke to John Tapper of Gopher Smelting. He informed me that the noise was found and quieted immediately after my phone call on the 2nd. It was caused by a faulty purge valve on the vacuum cleaner filtration system on the roof. The valve caused the unit to stick in the purge (self -clean) mode. Since then, the company has added a muffler to the unit to prevent future noise problems. Mr. Tapper said that they are being monitored by the M.P.C.A. and are attempting to stay within the noise pollu- tion limits and that we should feel free to direct any complaints to that agency. Jh `�'�n Stevenson JS/kg THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY A/-7 • J "Hereto Some You" August 8, 1985 Beermann Services (Specialists in Refuse Removal) 6900 Dixie Ave E., Inver Grove Heights, Mn Phone (612) 451-1855 Tom Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: Serving the Metro Area 55075 Since 1969 As you know, Autumn is right around the corner and Fall cleanup will probably be top priority for many citizens in your community, Beermann Services is interested in conducting a Fall Recycling Day and/or a Fall Cleanup Day. Materials we can handle include tires, drain oil, appliances, and all normally recycled materials. We can also handle yard debris, brush, old lumber, furniture, and other non -garbage items. An event such as this can assist your citizens in the doldrum task of Fall cleanup. I realize that an event of this nature would have to be approved by your City Council. I would also need assistance in providing a location convenient to all residents. Any help that you can give me regarding this function would be greatly appreciated. I can be reached at (612) 451-1855 or at the address listed on the above letterhead. I will be looking forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, Bernie Beermann Beermann Services Rubbish Removal and Recycling BB: jm —No Job Too Large or Too Small — MEMO TO: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: ELMER BORGSCHATZ, SIGN INSPECTOR , ;Q DATE: AUGUST 8, 1985 HE: FALSE ADVERTISING QUESTION The City receptionist brought to my attention a telephone message stating that the sign south of Cliff and east of Galaxie suggested commercial zoning when the land.actually is zoned residential, (R-1). I have communicated with the complainant advising him that I would look into the matter. On several occasions I talked to his wife about my findings, but have been unable to speak to the complainant personally. I shall list a • number of facts that lead me to suggest that the matter can best be resolved through a legal opinion on the question of signage and related questions as follows: 1. Ex. A (attached) reads: FOR SALE 2.5 ACRES COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL 2. EX. B represents a map from the Comprehensive Guide Plan of 1979 and 1980. The area involved is circled with the red dot representing the approximate location of the sign. The area was apparently never rezoned to light business (L/B) and therefore, remained agriculture. 3. EX: Webster's Dictionary would infer by definition that potential could mean the possibility or something that can develop or become actual. 4. EX. A: The sign in question (on photo) is located 180 ft. south of Cliff Road and approximately 25 ft. east of Galaxie. The question as to whether or not false advertising is the case is the reason we need the legal opinion which may be helpful in future cases. /db • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMD03ERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: BEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SCOTT MORGAN, PARKS AND RECREATION ASSISTANT DATE: AUGUST 9, 1985 SUBJECT: CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM This memorandum's intent is to suggest alternatives for the 1985-1986 City Composting Program as requested by the City Council at its regular meeting held on July 2, 1985. These alternatives will attempt to fit within the range of a moderate expansion of the existing program, that the Council had • requested. These alternatives are presented to the Council to supply them with specific information on possible composting programs that could be implemented as part of a city-wide solid waste reduction and resource recovery plan. The Council is asked to review the given alternatives and select one or any combinations of alternatives to be implemented. This memo summarizes background information, history of last year's Pilot Program, goals of the Composting Program, available funding and program alternatives. Background The composting of yard waste is a simple and environmentally beneficial alternative to landfill disposal or burning. Yard waste, when landfilled, does not compress well and uses up valuable landfill space. Open burning increases air pollution and is unsafe. The composting process is an attempt to copy the pathways of degradation occurring in nature, but concentrating it in time and space. Not only does composting solve a solid waste management problem, it converts the valuable organic matter available in yard waste into • a useful mulch and soil conditioner. Compost products have many excellent properties. It improves the porosity of the soil, builds it up with organics, increases water retention tilth, permeability, and reduces surface crusting and erosion. The importance of a composting program stems deeper than the above mentioned benefits. Its role as a landfill waste steam reducer has been targeted as a major immediate priority by the Metropolitan Council. The reason for making composting an immediate priority is because during spring, summer and fall yard debris make up an impressive 20-30 percent of the waste steam. Since grass and leaves are heavier than regular garbage, it constitutes as much as 40 percent of the disposal costs. Staff has developed the following program goals to guide in the planning of a City Wide Composting Program. Program Goals 1. To establish a waste reduction and resource recovery foundation that can be easily expanded to meet future demands. 150 CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 2 2. To reduce the impact on county landfill by collecting 700 cu. yds. of compostable materials in 1986. 3. To establish a composting program that is convenient and easy to understand for residents. 4. To coordinate a composting program with other waste reduction resource recovery programs within the city, county and metro area. 5. To conduct an ongoing public education and relation program on the benefits of composting and recycling. 6. To provide drop-off and pick-up services at no charge to the user. In order to present program alternatives, a brief overview of the current program is in order to greater understand the presented alternatives and • to recognize the area's expansion. Current Program The composting program was a pilot program started in the fall of 1984 and accepted leaves only. Two small sites were used and a large quantity of leaves were received. These sites, though receiving enough leaves to compost, did not produce a quality compost due to site size and inappropriate equipment to maintain the pile on a site that small. Because demand for a compost finished product this spring was greater than the current program could supply, the Parks and Recreation Department had delivered, free of charge, 96 cu. yds. of finished compost from Minneapolis. The Park and Recreation Department has also started to publicize the availability and benefits of compost in the local newspaper along with providing a referral service for recycling services and markets. Although the pilot program is considered a success, it is not without its • problems. The following is an overview of some of the problems associated with the pilot program. 1. Size of sites The initial pilot program had two small sights which were not large enough to allow for adequate piling and pile turning. 2. Site Security The pilot program did have a problem with site security. The problem was not with vandals but with people dumping this spring on leaves that have already composted, mixing leaves with the finished product making it inferior and undesirable to use. 3. Site Stability .Under current circumstances the locations are being moved each year. Because locations have been placed on undeveloped park locations, the need to move them as a park is developed has made the program inconvenient to the residents. CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 3 4. Education The current open refuse hauling system operating in the City makes it more convenient to simply bag yard waste and have it hauled away, not realizing the ramification associated with that action. 5. Manpower With the addition of a composting pilot program, additional hours were needed that were not present to adequately plan and maintain the site and educate the public. 6. Equipment The pilot program was limited by the amount of equipment owned by the City. The City restircted the program to accepting leaves only. • Program Alternatives The program alternatives listed will attempt to achieve the above listed goals and try to alleviate the problem associated with the pilot program while meeting the City Council's request for a moderate expansion. Alternative #1 A. Program location To rent a 3-5 acre semi-permanent site (3 or more year lease) which residents of the City could become familiar with and recognize as a stable composting site. The site should have good access and be secured with a locked gate to prevent illegal dumping. The site will have limited days and hours for a compostable product drop-off and compost finished product pick-up. The site will require adequate signs giving directions, days and times, and dumping restrictions. (This site could also be used as a • glass, paper and aluminum drop-off recycling center, if desired.) B. Expand compostable materials To expand the amount of compostable materials from only leaves to grass clippings, garden waste, leaves and tree waste. In order to include tree waste, grass clippings and garden waste in the expanded program it requires more compost pile maintenance and the purchasing of a wood chipper. C. Public Education Public education plays a key role in the overall development of composting program. Public education would serve to inform the residents of the existing City and metro area composting programs, recycling program markets, program and product benefits, program specifics (days open) and serve as a general public relation ,tool to further strengthen government/citizen relations. (See Appendix 1 for estimated budgets; this budget may contain "one-time" expenses - Equipment and Sign Purchases, thus are not a reflection ofeY arly operational costs.) /6'L CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 4 Alternative Pros and Cons Pros A. Program provides a great public service. B. Wood chipper would have multi uses within the City Parks and Recreation Department. Under the current situation it takes a number of trips to transport a small brush pile which in most cases is 99% air. With the addition of a wood chipper the City could yield a compostable product, an excellent mulch product for City and citizen use which would provide a means to efficiently transport waste wood. The acquisition of the wood chipper would also decrease the amount of wood presently being burned. C. Educate the public preparing them for future changes. • D. An expanded program would increase eligibility for grant-in-aid program from outside funding sources. Cons - Increase program cost - Increased pile odor because of grass clippings Alternative #2 (Alternative #2 is in addition to the above mentioned alternative.) A. Site Monitor The addition of a "site monitor" to supervise drop and pick-up location. The monitor would supervise the dropping off of all materials to insure • that all foreign debris does not contaminate the compost. The monitor would serve as reference to people searching for recycling drop-off locations and recycleable product markets. B. Compost Shredder Purchase/Rental To purchase or rent a shredder to chop the compostable materials to speed the breakdown of the materials, yielding a higher quality of compost and reduce the "size" of material in volume. Alternative #2 Pros and Cons Pros A. The monitor would be able to provide information and promote the program, answer any questions, listen to suggestions and keep compost free of unwanted debris. CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 5 B. The shredder would provide a high quality of compost which will maintain a good give-away market, or could be used by the City for forestation and park development. Cons - An increased cost - Depending on amount of compostable materials received, a shredder may not be cost effective. - Unit rental is undependable. Alternative #3 • (Alternative #3 is in addition to the above mentioned alternative.) A. Multiple drop-off areas The addition of "drop -off -locations" throughout the City would create greater convenience for the residents of the City. In order to provide this service additional manpower and equipment will be required. Ideally, a hook -type container lifter permanently mounted to a truck and 3 or 4 containers would serve this function. This service would be supplied during the fall and spring when the demand is the heaviest. Containers would be placed at locations throughout the City. Containers would be checked daily. When a container is full it is taken to the composting site, dumped and returned. More signs and publicity would also be required to institute this new program. Additional containers could be added and utilized for specific recycleable material - paper, glass and aluminum, expanding the scope of the Recycleable Program. Alternative #3 Pros and Cons • 1. The addition of drop-off sites will make it more convenient for residents of the City. 2. The equipment used in this operation would have multi use flexibility. The hook -lift equipment has many different container attachments and other truck box features. A multi use piece of equipment like this would be important if a Citywide recycling program of other material was ever implemented. Cons 1. Greater cost to program 2. Questionable added convenience If someone would drive 6 blocks to the drop-off container why wouldn't they drive a mile to the composting site? 3. Drop-off containers are very valuable to garbage and other foreign debris being dumped in them. (This problem will be magnified as waste cost increases.) 15Y_ CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 6 Alternative #4 (Alternative #4 is in addition to the above mentioned alternatives.) A. Curb side pick-up Curb side pick-up of compostable products is by far the most effective means of gathering compost. Curb side pick-up can be performed by City crews, but is more commonly done by "contracted haulers". Pick-ups are usually done one day a week, 3 or 4 times in the spring and £all. I£ a curb side pick-up were implemented a largef site may be required in order to handle the volume of materials taken in. If a City crew collected the yard waste more manhours and equipment would be required. Greater signage and publicity would also be required. Alternative #4 Pros and Cons • Pros A. Maximum collection of compostable materials H. Curb side collection would be a major step towards preparing the public for the future total source separation of recycleable materials. C. Provide a greater public service to the residents of the City. D. A recycling program could easily stem from this program. Cons The very high cost, organization time and insufficient equipment • The preceding alternatives and budget estimates, though brief, should supply enough specifics to give the Council a good idea of the general scope of the program alternatives. All the alternatives given by Staff could be implemented by the spring of 1986 and most of them could be implemented for this fall's composting season. The cost of the chosen program would most likely be offset by some outside funding sources available to the City for which this program is eligible. Site Location Alternative Locating a composting site is an important aspect of the overall program development. Possible composting sites will be evaluated on location, physical characteristics, and cost. The following criteria has been developed by Staff to evaluate possible site locations. 16�5 CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 7 A. Location The site should be located in a place that is ... - convenient to the residents who pick up and drop off materials. - easily and safely accessible from a paved road. - not a nuisance to surrounding property. - easy to secure. B. Physical characteristics The physical characteristics of the site should be ... - to have good drainage that does not flow directly into a pond or lake. - large enough to meet current and future demand (3-5 acres). - flat or lightly sloped. • C. Cost The cost for rental or purchase, site development, (making the site accessible) should be a major consideration. Staff has explored some possible site locations which meet all or some of the above mentioned criteria. These locations appear to meet the selection criteria. A. South of the City Municipal Center on city property proposed for a Civic Center. B. North of Yankee Doodle Road near the intersection of 35E on MnDOT property. C. West of Lexington Avenue in between Lexington Avenue - Lexington Way and Diffley Raod (privately owned). D. North of Cliff Road in between the North entrance ramp onto Cedar • Avenue and Nichols Road (privately owned). Staff has evaluated these sites and to date the most desirable site is the City owned property next to the Municipal Center. This site meets all the criteria and would be available for a reasonable length of time. Funding Assistance A. Dakota County Landfill Abatement Funding Assistance Grants are available for local communities within Dakota County in an initial amount not to exceed $1.00/household for qualifying landfill abatement expenses. The county will use the most recent estimates of households from the Metropolitan Council. (Note: Eagan has 10,528 households @ $1.00 = $10,528.00.) A�6 CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 8 B. Resource Recovery Grants and Loans- The grant and loan program under this subdivision is administered by the Metropolitan Council. Grants and loans are given for resource recovery projects. Grants and loans for planning may not exceed 50% of the planning cost. Grants and loans may be made for public education on the need for the resource recovery project. Grants and loans for acquisition of land and equipment and for capital improvements may not exceed 50% of the cost of the project. All projects funded must be in conformance with the approved master plan. Grants and loans will be given out January 31 of the -next year for project expenses incurred in the present year. C. Land Abatement Cost Recovery - By January 31, 1986, and each January 31 • afterwards, the director of the agency shall pay each city in the metropolitan area an amount not to exceed $.50 per household for qualifying landfill abatement and resource recovery expenses incurred in the previous calendar year. to qualify for these funds, programs must be consistent with the County master plan and expenses must be certified. (Note: Eagan has an estimated 10,528 households @ $.50 = $5,264.00, combined with the $10,528 from the County, the City has $15,792 available to start the program in '85.) All of these funds may be used in coordination with one another. Applications for funding will be measured against others as to technical suitability, cost effectiveness, applicant commitment, conformance to the Solid Waste Master Plan, completeness of project and degree of abatement. By developing a stronger composting program the City is taking some progressive steps into the future of landfill abatement and resource recovery. Landfill abatement and resource recovery are two words that the resident of this City will be hearing a lot about in the future as • landfill space becomes scarce. However, because of the action taken in the past and now over the next year's program the impact of future circumstances will not affect the resident ,of this community as profoundly. Summation/Recommendation: The City, by law, will eventually be required to have a Source Separation Program. Composting is an immediate priority. Funding from Dakota County and matching from Met Council - approximately $15,000 is available - this year alone. Alternate #2 appears to be the most reasonable approach with the site south of City Hall as the most logical location. Council Action To review the given alternatives and make a selection of one or combination of alternatives to be implemented this fall and in 1986. /5-, Estimated Budget Alternative #1 (Cost estimates based on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Metro Area.) Personnel Costs Planning and Administration Pile Maintenance Publicity Printing Signs Site Costs Rent * Site Development (Grading) Gate Equipment (New equipment needed) * Wood Chipper Contract Services Garbage Collection Insurance Total Estimated Budget Total Cost 900.00 1,400.00 700.00 225.00 900.00 3,000.00 250.00 12,000.00 60.00 150.00 $19,585.00 Appendix #1 * This is a one-time, non -reoccurring expenditure. lo, Estimated Budget Alternative #2 (Cost Estimates baserd on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Metro Area) Personnel Cost Total Cost Planning and Administration 900.00 Pile Maintenance 1,400.00 Site Monitor 1,800.00 Publicity Printing 700.00 Signs 225.00 Site Costs Rent 900.00 * Site Development 3,000.00 * Gate 250.00 Equipment (New equipment needed) * Wood Chipper 12,000.00 * Shredder/screen 29.000.00 Contract Services Insurance 150.00 Garbage Collection 60.00 (Optional shredder/screen rental) _ Total Estimated Budget $50,205.00 Appendix # 2 15 j Estimated Budget Alternative #3 (Cost estimates based on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Personnel Cost Planning and Administration Pile Maintenance Site Monitor Transporting yard waste Publicity Printing is Signs Rent * Site Development Gate Equipment (New equipment needed) * Wood chipper * Shredder/screen * Hook lift and 4 containers Contract services ' Insurance Garbage collection Optional Shredder rental Total EstimatedBudget Metro Area) Appendix #3 160 Total Cost 900.00 1,400.00 1,800.00 600.00 750.00 300.00 900.00 3,000.00 250.00 12,000.00 29,000.00 16,000.00 150.00 60.00 $67,110.00 Estimated Budget Alternative #4 (Cost estimates based on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Metro Area) Personnel Cost Planning and Administration Pile Maintenance Site Monitor Transporting yard waste Publicity Printing Signs Rent * Site Development Gate Equipment (New equipment needed) Wood chipper Shredder/screen Hood lift, 4 containers, vehicle Contract Services Insurance Garbage collection Optional Shredder rental Curbside pick-up Total Estimated Budget Appendix #4 161 m_a_i n__1 900.00 1,400.00 800.00 600.00 850.00 350.00 900.00 3,000.00 250.00 12,000.00 29,000.00 27,000.00 150.00 60.00 18,000.00 $96,260.00 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 20, 1985 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Traffic Signals/Blackhawk Road & T. H. 13 2. Lapel Button 3. Athletic Field Lighting for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks 4. Declaration of Surplus Property 5. Star City Signing DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Municipal State Aid Street, Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Update 2. Boerchert-Ingersoll Trunk Storm Sewer Assessment Appeal (Gopher Smelting) MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 19, 1985 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY There are no items to be considered under City Attorney at this time. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Traffic Signals/Blackhawk Road & T.H. 13 --As a matter of information, a letter was received from the MnDOT District 9 Traffic Engineer, referring to their investigation regarding the City's request for a traffic signal at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Trunk Highway 13. A cop f this letter and information is found on pages through The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss this item if desired by the City Council. There is no action required on this item. Item 2. Lapel Button --Administrative Assistant Duffy has prepared drawings for the purpose of ordering the lapel pin which will be sold and distributed as a part of the I -35E ribbon cutting ceremony in early November. The art work will be presented by the City Administrator at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction re- garding the size, color combination, wording and number of City of Eagan lapel pins to be ordered for sale and distribution through- out the City. Item 3. Athletic Field Lighting for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks --Plans and specifications are in order as are proposal forms for seeking athletic field lighting bids for the Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Park developments. The contract would include the lighting of two hockey rinks at Goat Hill Park, baseball field lighting at Goat Hill Park and hockey rink lighting at Ridgecliff'Park. Funding was allocated through the parks develop- ment bond fund and work will be performed under the direct super- vision and coordination of Contract 85-23. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny athletic field lighting for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks. /�,3 CITY ADMINISTRATOR (continued) Item 4. Declaration of Surplus Property --The Parks & Recreation Department has two Kelly -Creswell line stripers which were formerly used for striping of athletic fields. These walk -behind units have been replaced by the unit the Department invented utilizing a golf cart nearly two years ago. During these past two years, the Kelly-Creswells have not been utilized by the Park Department or Public Works and, therefore, the Director of Parks & Recreation is recommending the equipment be declared surplus property and offered for sale. One unit is in reasonably good condition while the second unit is in poor condition and will require considerable maintenance and repair before it is operable. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the declaration of surplus property for the two (2) Kelly -Creswell line stripers. Item 5. Star City Signing --The Economic Development Commission had proposed the installation of Star City signs at the Interstate and freeway entrances to the City of Eagan. To install three (3) 30" X 120" interstate highway compatible Star City signs, the cost is $1,012. These signs would be installed approximately 200 to 300 feet behind the town name marker signs. Those locations are as follows: 1) Interstate 35E - north approach near its intersections with I-494 and Trunk Highway 55; 2) Interstate 35E - south approach near its interseciton with Trunk Highway 77; and 3) Interstate 494 - west approach near its overpass of Trunk Highway 13 and its intersection with Pilot Knob Road. It will be necessary to authorize the development and installation of these signs at this time if signs are to be installed by November 1, 1985, to meet the I -35E ribbon -cutting date. The City can acquire smaller signs, 18" X 84", for installation on State highways. The State will allow Eagan crews to install these signs and, therefore, the cost for six (6) signs is $426 with installation by the City crews. These signs would exist on the Cedar Freeway, T.H. 13, T.H. 3, and Highway 52. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize all or a portion of the Star City signs as presented. 14 C/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS item 1. Municipal State Aid Street Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Update --The State Aid Division of the Minnesota Department of Transportation is requiring the City to update the approved 1982 five year construction program. State aid uses a Council approved five year construction program for their information only. It is in no way binding onto the City to complete any of the projects the Council approves in the five year construction program. Council passed the 1982 five year construction program on January 18, 1983. Enclosed on page(s) (o and jQ is a copy of the five year construction program appr ved 'at that meeting. Enclosed on oaae5114117is the staff's recommendation for the five year construction program from 1985 to 1989. Pages Z-5 through contain location maps for each particular year's projects f -the Council's reference. As Council will note the schedule is rather aggressive. However, most of the recommended improvements result from the lack of development the City is incurring and also the Dakota County Highway Department five year capital improvement plan. The County has already approved their five year improvement plan and all indications reveal they will be attempting to follow it closely. The Public Works Director will be available to answer any questions Council may have regarding staff's recommendations for the municipal state aid street five year construction program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the five year construction program as submitted by staff or as modified by Council. /4 J Item 2. Boerchert- Ingersoll Trunk Storm Sewer Assessment Appeal (Gopher Smelting) --On August 7, 1984, the final assessment hearing was held for the above -referenced project. At that time, Gopher Smelting submitted a written objection and followed through with a notice of appeal for the special assessments against their four parcels. This item was then forwarded to the Special Assess- ment Committee with the staff directed to prepare an appraisal. The Special Assessment Committee then reviewed all information and appraisals and reaffirmed the original amount of the asessment. Gopher Smelting pursued their appeal with a trail scheduled for August 15, 1985. This trail date has been temporarily postponed to allow the Council to consider a proposed negotiated settlement between the City and Gopher Smelting. Forwarded to the City Council without page number is a letter from our City Attorney providing information pertaining to this potential assessment appeal trial and the recommended settlement with alternative courses of action. The City Attorney and the Public Works Director will be able to discuss the issue in further detail if the Council has additional questions or concerns. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify the recommended settlement regarding the special assessment appeal by Gopher Smelting under Project 381 (Boerchert-Ingersoll - Trunk Storm Sewer) and if denied, provide direction to staff pertaining to resolution of this appeal. /4 'N 077 '1 f:'; Do yo Minnesota „ .. Department of Transportation " c District 9 OFTV% 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9056.., -• North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 u r ..,. c . I] u d R•iIF ❑ U MUS p August 12, 1985 Mr. Thomas E. Angus Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik S Associates, Inc. 2335 West T.H. 36 St. -.Paul, Minnesota 55113 --- -- ---. Dear Mr. Angus: SUBJECT: C.S. 1901 T.H. 13 at Blackhawk Road Traffic Signal Request LJ 4 .1 0 Rlii i) i_l" Telephone 779-1121 As per your request, we have conducted a traffic study to see if the intersection of T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road warrants a traffic signal. A traffic volume count was taken and indicated that there is not enough traffic on Blackhawk Road to warrant a traffic signal installation. Attached is the traffic signal warrant form with traffic volumes. Also, with the planned opening of I -35E this fall, the traffic volumes on T.H. 13 should be significantly reduced. While T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road does not warrant signalization at this time, we will continue to monitor this intersection at this time. The need still appears to be several years away. For your information, we have a resurfacing project scheduled on T.H. 13 from T.H. 77 to T.H. 55 for next year. If you desire further information about that project, please contact Mr. Jerome Sivertson, District Preliminary Design Engineer, at 779-1204. Sincerely, e Michael L. Robinson, P.E. District Traffic Engineer Attachment: 6 An Equal OypormnhY Emplojrr rnr�ira�vfT IHI IUN r- TRAFFIC STUDY . SECTION WARRANT FORM 's P IIO/ SPEED�3 N•�, LANES T u alk QJ. _..�.oMa_ J App • 1 Locations Major App. 3 �'�/B 5•B. Date - / w% GB Warrant No. y (70,00 Minor App.2 Minor App.4 au�d ,mak urB CITY OF EAGAN YEAR PROJECT MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET 5 -YEAR 1985 - 1989 SEGMENT (FROM -TO) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PREPARED 01-10-85 LENGTH PROJECT (MILES) DESCRIPTION 1985 DENMARK AV DUCKWOOD DR - YANKEE DOODLE RD 0.50 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DUCKWOOD DR KRESTWOOD LN - DENMARK AV 0.34 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DEERWOOD DR 0.25 MI E PILOT KNOB - DENMARK AV 0.20 44' STREET CONSTR 1985 DENMARK AV DEERWOOD DR - 0.12 MI S OF WESCOTT 0.38 44' STREET CONSTR 1985 TOTAL 1956 YANKEE DOODLE RD TH 13 - FEDERAL DR 0.93 4 LANE RECONSTR 1986 YANKEE DOODLE RD 135E - LEXINGTON AV 0.75 4 LANE RECONSTR 1986 NICOLS RD CLIFF RD - BEAM D' RUE DR 1.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 NORTHVIEW PARK RD LEXINGTON AV - 0.5 MI EAST 0.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 WESCOTT RD LEXINGTON AV - S HILLS DR 1.00 52' STREET CONSTR 1986 DEERWOOD OR 135E - PILOT KNOB RD 0.38 48' STREET CONSTR 1986 TOTAL 1987 JOHNNY CAKE NUC RD 0.6 Mf N HICKORY HILL - DIFFLEY RD 0.317 44' STRt:F:T CONSTR 1987 BLACKIIAWK Jill SILVER BELL RD - TH 13 0.73 44' STRt.Fr WIDENING 1987 BLACKHAWK RD DIFFLEY RU - DEENWOOD DR 0.60 44' S'1'Ht:t:l' WIDENING 1987 W BLUE GENTIAN RD TH 55 - ROBINS ADOII 0.45 44' STREET COUSTR 1987 RATIN RD SHALE LANE - BEAU D' HUE DR 1.31 36' STREET RECONSTR 1987 TOTAL 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR WILDERNESS RUN RD - DIFFLEY RD 0.62 52' STREET COUSTR 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.06 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 NORTHVIEW PARK RD 0.5 MI E LEX AV - S WESC'T HLLS RD 0.25 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 WESCOTT RD S HILLS DR - TH 149 1.00 52' STREET WIDENING 1988 LEXINGTON AV YANKEE DOODLE RD - 1.75 MI SOUTH 1.75 4 LANE RECONSTR 1988 TOTAL 1989 JOHNNY CAKE RDG RD DIFFLEY RD - DEERWOOD DR 0.71 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.30 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 14ORTEIVIEW PARK RD S WESCOTT HILLS DR - DODD RD 0.95 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 WILDERNESS RUN RD LEXINGTON AV - DODD RD 1.23 44' STREET WIDENIIIG 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - CLIFF RD 1.06 44' STREET WIDENING 1989 TOTAL 1965 - 1989 TOTALS (1) FROM DAKOTA COUNTY HWY DEPT 5 -YEAR PLAN (2) 44' STREET CONSTR RATE LESS EST'D GRADING COSTS REVISED 08-15-85 TOTAL EST'D " PROJECT COSTS $455,250 $309,570 $148,160 $281,504 $1,194,484 $410,850 (1) $405,405 (1) $1,365,750 $370,400 $910,500 $300,656 $3,763,561 $240,000 (2) $83, B04 $68,080 $333,360 $761,900 $1,487,944 I $564,510 $765,248 $185,200 $190,963 $779,625'(1) $2,505,546 $525,966 $963,040 $703,760 $282,408 $243,376 $2,718,552 4iiil milli $11,670,087 CITY OF EAGAN YEAR PROJECT MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET 5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1985 - 1989 PREPARED 01-10-65 SEGMENT (FROM -TO) LENGTH PROJECT (MILES) DESCRIPTION 1985 DENMARK AV DUCKWOOD DR - YANKEE DOODLE RD 0.50 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DUCKWOOD DR KRESTWOOD LN - DENMARK AV 0.34 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DEERWOOD DR 0.25 MI E PILOT KNOB - DENMARK AV 0.20 44' STREET CONSTR 1985 DENMARK AV DEERWOOD DR - 0.12 MI S OF WESCOTT 0.38 44' STHEET CONSTR 1985 TOTAL 1986 YANKEE DOODLE RD TH 13 - FEDERAL DR 0.93 4 LANE RECONSTH 1986 YANKEE DOODLE RD 135E - LEXINGTON AV - 0.75 4 LANE RECONSTR. 1986 NICOLS RD CLIFF RD - BEAU D' RUE DR 1.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 NORTHVIEW PARK RD LEXINGTON AV - 0.5 MI EAST 0.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 WESCOTT RD LEXINGTON AV - S HILLS DR 1.00 52' STREET CONSTR 1986 DEERWOOD DR 135E - PILOT KNOB RD 0.38 48' STREET CONSTR 1986 TOTAL 1987 JOHNNY CAKE RUG RD 0.6 MI N HICKORY HILL - DIFFLEY RD 0.38 44' STREET CONSTR 1987 BLACKHAWK RD SILVER BELL RD - TH 13 0.73 44' STREET WIDENING 1987 BLACKHAWK RD DIFFLEY RD - DEERWOOD DR 0.60 44' STREET WIDENING 1987 W BLUE GENTIAN RD TH 55 - ROBINS ADDN 0.45 44' STREET CONSTR 1987 RAHN RD SHALE LANE - BEAU D' RUE DR 1.31 36' STREET RECONSTR 1987 TOTAL 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR WILDERNESS RUN RD - DIFFLEY RD 0.62 52' STREET CONSTR 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.06 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 NORTHVIEW PARK RD 0.5 MI E LEX AV - S WESC'T HLLS RD 0.25 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 WESCOTT RD S HILLS DR - TH 149 1.00 52' STREET WIDENING 1988 LEXINGTON AV YANKEE DOODLE RD - 1.75 MI SOUTH 1.75 4 LANE RECONSTR 1988 TOTAL 1989 JOHNNY CAKE ROG RD DIFFLEY RD - DEERWOOD DR 0.71 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.30 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 NORTHVIEW PARK RD S WESCOTT HILLS DR - DODD RD 0.95 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 WILDERNESS RUN RD LEXINGTON AV - DODD RD 1.23 44' STREET WIDENING 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - CLIFF RD 1.06 44' STREET WIDENING 1989 TOTAL 1985 - 1989 TOTALS (1) FROM DAKOTA COUNTY HWY DEPT 5 -YEAR PLAN (2) 44' STREET CONSTR RATE LESS EST'D GRADING COSTS REVISED 08-15-85 TOTAL EST'D - PROJECT COSTS $455,250 $309,570 $148,160 $281,504 $1,194,484 $410,850 (1) $405,405 (1) $1,365,750 $370,400 $910,500 -'- $300,656 $3,763,561 $240,000 (2) $83,804 $68,980 $333,360 $761,900 $1,467,944 $564,510 $785,248 $185,200 $190,963 $779,625 (1) $2,505,546 $525,968 $963,040 $703,760 $282,408 $243,376 $2,718,552 IFk4Mkk kli kil $11,670,087 I MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREET SYSTEM 5 -Year Construction Program For (State Aid Expenditures Only) RL• V E ;'U E Present State Aid Construction Balance June 30, 19 9.2 = Estimated Annual Construction Allotment $ ,4a * .741 X 4 = .Estimated Total State Aid Allotment for Programming Purposes ESTIMATED EXP=:7D3 LtlR::S 1/2 $ G4 V3 Year Estimated of State Aid Yknenditure Ter -mini Project Description Expenditure On Blackhawk Rd From Cliff Road Grading, Base & 1983 To CSAR 30 Surfacing Length 1.0 mi $ 460,000 On Lexinaton 1983 From CSAH 30 Base & Surfacing g To ES—AH 32 (City's share) $ 160,000 Length 1.06 mi on Silver Bell 1984 From T.H. 13 To Blackhawk Rd Overlay 50,000 $' Length 0.80 'ml On Duckwood 1984 From Krestwood Base & Surfacing To Dehmark $ 220,000 Length 0.34 mi On Deerwood 1985 From Riverton To T_35F Br;dcp Grading, Base & $ 60,000 Lenth 0.1 mi Surfacing On Denmark 1985 From Duckwood Grading, Base & To Yankee Doodle Surfacing$ 320,000 Length 0.5 mi w 2/2 ESTI ,Mr) Year Estimated of State Aid Exoanditure Termini Project Oescrintion E:menditure On Denmark 1986 From 0. 12 mi s Wescott Grading, Base & To Deerwood Surfacing $ 240.000 Lenth 0.38 mi On Johnny Cake Ridge 1986 Fromm .6 mi n Hick.Hil Grading, Base & To CSAH 30 Surfacing $ 180,000 Len.-th 0.38 mi On Johnnv Cake Ridge 1987 From CSAH 30 Grading, Base & To Deerwood Surfacing $ 440,000 Length 0.71 mi On Deerwoodm 1988 Fro0.5 mi w Pilot Kn b To Pilot Knob Grading, Base & a 330.000 Length 0.5 mi Surfacing On From 5 -YEAR TOTAL 2,460,000 To r Len3th On Fro.., To Length On From To $ Lcn;,th On From To Lcn3th 17�-- J .J ' g?fir I °uti, I� I '� xooasxmE vex�0 ,6 I is �O .`i // I "' : g.F °rte s [ r �'!-st• [� h Irua V� ��!� •IIs P � CN, ft TO'LE4wY VAPR `HIL's Gf L-•A— Ls�� ranurY !l"J�: s:�og� _.il:" I 1 ftsuc eawase Ilu xue ...HI rovws[ 2 F G/L l �I [/P[ aerr •are 'teu•,C `T y u _ wVor _ Zplalfz._ •h �_-Ti y}4'7f t�ICRNIvf �'1GrL19PPAr _ r- tstu11.E ("�-�1 �wirT .Ls ]- c olyj I oM`•Yii moi. ..emrn, vA;� wrxaiam �T ; 31' %•'�_irk��l$n�tI.iwsr �,/ i� 1 �.— a•- '�` Tz�`[�•—'—Tl�' ...anC: I' °n 3 ply Y •. �r\l_I,] =�uCwR ' � ��Y l�1 IIAICX l ..n .- �Y 1 .•u+ L -^•i: ] /� l%"�""u.lt✓ly' -ull 2rr L g_ A .� aq\i a�rP2e, :4�-'iY LIZ` 10 f$i� [Y"��+1'II ' 1 -s.FIT � ., a a„ 8� srHILL wcw[E s . : o' • `qI,^°�[� - NPP atR. LJ �.[,-'f0 _ "`.'�' ••[ �.u_—._ wm. - O IT 1985 MUNICIPAL -STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ^I: DENMARK AV,. DUCKWOOD DR: YANKEEDOODLE RD 2 DUCKWOOD DR, KRESTWOOD LN. —: DENMARK. AV - 3 :: DEERWOOD DR,'. PILOT KNOB' DENMARK: AV 4' DENMARK AV,. DEERWOOD DR. DEERCLIFF LN' �1_1 198-6 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1: YANKEE DOODLE RD.. TH 13 -: FEDERAL DR 2 YANKEE DOODLE RD.: 135E - LEXINGTON AV '3 ::.NICHOLS, RD,: CLIFF RD -: BEAUDE RUE 4: : NORTHVIEW PARK RD.. LEXINGTON AV -: 0.5 MI EAST 5: : WESCOTT RD .: LEXINGTON. AV -. S: HILLS DR 6: :: DEERWOOD DR,: 135E: - PILOT KNOB RD 1Y ° e o E F y N m I MEHDOTA •� !;I HV0H7SL MEW T. r 3=... •'� �'�'•7L�i_I_!_ M / /RFs t.. e » _e a,.i:+� P• e wag 0� f✓0t0 0tom I �•eis i . v- a a \. '� IV; �_.. 6 40. IFFF 1 II .{� �j!/�' -9., •:sw.�l � T1•+4d f' �.i it�� I ' ;y....q :I 7 .' �\�N•..,'77��..aM1 �\11 +A =�a_ tee:' •1 i_e I i 14=4R a�5 7-moi T • • Ir.. n• ems— /.rte r "'°r:� '-=, s •�.:, gg27 - 12' ing 1 5j I— 9,/ i�E' .'.ga` iti•y L� a f. 3i ,' .rti � ;a:,� ... / 1 I v� ^" }�. �_ ' rV. •;: �.. . r:sv:a All -:r .— �y ,�'4.,�_ i •O ^i "1. i.�..4,.L. �-�.1--,- f? � -all; `�' ��JO, _ _ a-, Jy`` 1 i life m�� '� y .Az.f - r ::,� 1�e ,-•"'" ti'::f [yam `•` F ear- � �� -.m -• ! I a'�1`ye l`7 ..y-�� ` r �:;,y-�', �l`e'��^�.' I Q ;'r�'�"�.:.e,. 1987 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS JOHNNYCAKE' RIDGE RD,: 0.6, MI' N HICKORY' HILL. -: DIFFLEY' RD 2: :: BLACKHAWK: R.D.: S.ILVERBELL. R.ID - TH' 13 3 :: BLACKHAWK RD,, DIFFLEY RD -' DEERWOOD DR 4 W BLUE GENTIAN RD, TH 66' -' TH 149 6. RAHN RD,: SHALE LN - BEAU' D'' RUE DR - //J .1988 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1 :. 8 WESCOTT HILL DR.. WILDERNESSRUN'. RD -: DIFFLEY RD 2: :: S WESCOTT HILLS- DR,. DIFFLEY RD' -: WESCOTT RD 8: ; NORTHVIEW PARK RD,. 0.5 MI E LEX AV' -' 8' WESCOTT HILLS- DR 4";: WESCOTT RD., 8 HILLS DR -' TH 149 5 LEXINGTON AV,. YANKEE DOODLE RD -: 1.76' MI SOUTH 176 -. 1Ji1 5• - a " , v.cwr •�. CdAw/IGL u a 9/9UC1-%' •Yp. ii" •• •/}•, 1.. N/L[S GIXI 4ivafF 11 I � E ew[ I "'o"-- Ls Y� '- �j ✓ 3T� °nwf IOr 9 wAPL'6liJSi A+3- • carrm, /.oar—.; .. ' —� �ygfUQRpPI Yp Lsw. LxiwR L - sdx "L"r " .Tqa- ' CQL1fM 3/(/fyf`'saa<v �= uatn �! we�rwPAADenEsr _ _ •_\_l_P_H_ _ .... _S_'____ - -¢�� .L.s... a IF�� Riiiy'1 Ys LL DIFFLEY RD -: 2 E--DODD RD,: DIFFLEY RD -'. A. 2 1. 3_ l`QQQ:--•.� :�•••3•:: WESCOTT HILLS 77 f AZNT?W/M1I1 ICN , ( IT. .. �� "• ::WILDERNESS RUN RD, LEXINGTON r`•'• fARX 512 2 D O D D RD 5 its �S'L,y� _ .J `;:F f; �nq�- =�\ I y} :•i ' .rF Gi\1 SII IIq`y}�.}� � �]f�cYLe�9T[: ee;. :',.� �..•oI A"—L�S.Lr".n.Iiil a.Yai:'� a L-.{a"vfFwFE rc• j g Q��n s '. `- r COAT I P cA I -Lam.:'= IJSQcr qx .. II.9�\� Pd AR ^ p �J lM•s1J :L. fir' 3 �' �,• a°ri • /6 V _ �Ha N • = L —Z a v0 `: O i16,• ` a'?�a'^ae•�I `c-.�r�r`a�_. ..•n C I 5 I " 4 f� l'r'• ff d f•y'': 1/ wd L..F XILL PARR 1.�'Z, SCXwdMZ'.: I �o RC5/OF -e SAR I! ._-:uYu" n a �i L8" _ ll.� IARf AA... -'r ii I� ��a_•C'/�xS T �%s RC�r • a `` M ®' fIIiIAC$13 9 oR S � tr��• ��-�" 1.. 1�/ �[?XE: oa w �� L � g,11 t atmos+ •_ - 11:�L ` - Ste•}�• � •• � f• .• 4'y �,::. 4 t'• .: •q F(,l � `� �' L -,�,�-TARE-•rl� °t i�� I a /\`6 � ��s �,Al•N � z �'•SR-�\qs n(�' = as � � i(nrN c Lae. yq� O". _ L°Yry�r � Mt �N:V':[n.i 1� ii'1��, n L ' Y MRRE �(�q•��` -� � 'i�_ __3J ^ �•tl � � rP•Y �.,,se� - IMR PowO •��Y�+ /��'i \3 _ 4r ..:A' ?I n,ZciY��tfi •Lne49 li n 1 �z" •'xd / aAarls / �� A.aRLnFw •�� •. � 4 M ra SS .0 ` t L • �S•fir`LP I a- -0Iy rt r�i. .'d LyF l 14 '1y �,• I" " I , wd[.S iFA' •w JFLNu.itO` A_ �� LY' fAP/RV��J�%�f� '•' U!M/M�sw�� '- IlLL 11��s` /� `1F '..h1 1446ali5!' [ 4YY ell 1989 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVMENTS 4 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD,: DIFFLEY RD -: DEERWOOD DR 2 E--DODD RD,: DIFFLEY RD -'. WESCOTTRD 3_ *_NORTHVIEW PARK RD,. S WESCOTT HILLS DR - DODD_ RD 4. ::WILDERNESS RUN RD, LEXINGTON AV -' D O D D RD 5 :"'DODD RD,. DIFFLEY RD -: CLIFF RD 177 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL AUGUST 20, 1985 6:30 P.H. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES IIII. 6:37 - TAX ABATEMENTS - DAKOTA COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE -VIV. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS I VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS r 7-Z A. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility ease- ments in Sun Cliff 5th Addition B. Public Hearing for IDB Funding of $400,000 for Office // Building in Knob Hill Professional Park (Richard Nordlund) C. Public Hearing for Renewal of Conditional Use Permit for Werner Lembke, Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke let Addition in SE 1/2 of Section 13 VII. OLD BUSINESS 22 'pppp 4 A. UPS Building Permit L ,?,g B. IDB Entitlement Funding A. Fire Department C. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department D. Public Works Department �. v. 6:55 CONSENT AGENDA �O A. Personnel Items B. Contractor Licenses C. Excavation Permit #EX33-155, Brittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) D. Project 459, Receive Petition/Authorize a Feasibility Report P (Brittany'9th Addition - Streets & Utilities) 9 E. Project 460, Authorize Feasibility Report (Nicola Road - Streets) �)D F. Final Plat Approval, Woodhaven Addition (Terry Stover) �.I1. G. Final Plat approval, UPS 1st Addition (United Parcel Service, Inc.) H. Vacation o£ Drainage & Utility Easements, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Meadowlands Addition) -fes /Q I. Contract 84-20, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Cliff d gyp•/d J. Commercial Park - Streets & Utilities) Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing 1 (Miscellaneous Projects) P /q K. Development Contract Amendments - Time Extensions for Public Improvements (Miscellaneous Contracts) L. Notice of Default/Intent to File on Performance Bond (Century Addition and Crossroads of Eagan) �( M. Change Order #2 for Project 85-14, Parks Improvement 1 Contract VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS r 7-Z A. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility ease- ments in Sun Cliff 5th Addition B. Public Hearing for IDB Funding of $400,000 for Office // Building in Knob Hill Professional Park (Richard Nordlund) C. Public Hearing for Renewal of Conditional Use Permit for Werner Lembke, Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke let Addition in SE 1/2 of Section 13 VII. OLD BUSINESS 22 'pppp 4 A. UPS Building Permit L ,?,g B. IDB Entitlement Funding VIII. NEW BUSINESS f/b A. Conditional Use Permit for Community Action Council (Frank TBrennan to Allow a Shelter for Battered Women, Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, NW 1/4 of Section 30 P,t�9 B. Conditional Use Permit for Flour Bin Addition (Rey Anderson, Jr. for a Pylon Sign Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Flour Bin Addition, Section 31 p 5�7 C. Preliminary Plat for Spande 7th Addition (Roy Spends) Containing 4 Single -Family Lots on 3.4 Acres on Part of Gov't. Lot 7 in Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 4 D. Rezoning For Wyndham Corporate Center (Kirt Woodhouse, Trammell Crow Co.) of Approximately 21 Acres to a Planned Development and a Preliminary Plat Which Would Contain 1 Lot and 1 Outlot in Pt. of the SW -174—of the NE 1/4 of Section 4 �9 P E. Preliminary Plat for Wedgwood 2nd Addition (Brad Swenson/ Jim Curry Consisting of Approximately 10 Acres and Containing 22 Lots on Outlot C, Wedgwood let Addition, Section 26 /p F. Preliminary Plat for Lemay Lake Hills (Al Kempf/Martin Shields Consisting of Approximately 13.69 acres containing 8 Single Family Lots & 40 Apartment Units and Rezoning to a Planned Development Located in Part of the NW 174 o£ Section 10, North of Towerview Road G. Preliminary Plat for Suncliff 3rd Addition (Robert Carlson) Consisting of 13.5 Acres Containing 5 Duplex Lots and Four 12 -Unit Multiple Bldgs. in Pt. of NW 1/4 & NE 1/4 of Sec.29 H. Wine & Beer License for Hong Wong Restaurant, Cedar -Cliff r / Shopping Center (3 j I. Final Resolution for Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds for Forest Ridge Addition /3� J. LaFonda De Acebo Liquor License I%. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 7°./L-6 A. Contract 85-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedar Industrial Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) NZ, B. Contract 85-20, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington 7Square 2nd Addition - Trunk & Sanitary Sewer) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %I. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 15, 1985 SUBJECT: AGENDA After approval of the August 6, 1985, regular minutes, special City Council minutes for the July the agenda for the August 20, 1985, City Council following items are in order for consideration: Y 1?;V1 City Council 23 meeting and meeting, the There are two (2) real estate tax reductions being proposed by 40 the Dakota County Assessor's office. The real estate abatements under consideration are as follows: 1) Gregory Kranz - The house is in extremely poor condition for its age. It had been on the market for 12 months with no offers and finally sold for $100,000. It has extremely creaky floors, condensation between the window panes on 508 of the windows, poor quality cabinets and leaky plumbing. The estimated market value should be reduced from $106,100 to $88,200. A location map showing this property is on page114 . 2) Donald Donahue - The house was not entered during the reassessment - owner • called, did a review. The estimated market value should be reduced from $124,600 to $115,700. These notes are reproduced from Mr. Peterson who is proposing the tax abatements. Refer to the enclosed map on page$ that was prepared by the Engineering Department for a review of this property description. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve or deny the tax abatements as presented by the Dakota County Assessor's office. c 9 ': N ,• Ls, F •11WW 1, f �r 8 I: Y' n• •x '.`n'rA b �� y, g/t�ie[s• °�W! NI I.. ••a1, : R -_ .ri 4+; Nr�„ b`_rAh, uib Kr �•.•'rrx'r "'lf�'�; •iris• t • !.`• if ci. o°I p• • P• "1:' 'o AtlM K� 9''I° B.A.c,'t xw +•�, •, " 6 . m a. a .. x � N 'i: r. 9 .i - = _ _� _,' J t.r,,. n» bn ba .z b . aua•r a ..i.x u.r ww uw e "o w lxbr � :' �$ • •' • Y oY N N N x'C O N Fr' - o o r Y N\ 1'„5 ” .. •y w 4�.r .w.r � • 3 '" i. \e� •s ',.� e•lo'ib so R e:ae; I • '' l++v1�•�a`.K bxo ,•rv. rem a•[[:• f �• ..,rr.•••, :C..-.. .....• ...N -HI Y ; • L -"+y-_BEACpry :K •,re ;.w •:: r, •+» » uou kin': [a x• brum •r•• •. ♦�+ ��,•i n ;d�iari?''.w =\�9y e!�i.:'�.. mCg Y � �L � N �i=fYY$+a.•',,.• � �: r t � eg �+ j.f;::;�Y. .. xnew Im .n so »w ♦ .+ ..y. CD r•r.r Dr Y = rnp n° �zt':'i7 '9. ' �[� - .f Rk o • L Q i n[ a •• •i v• a ' •>.:+• , ..ti L, r e e bnY n +` •...Ny 82lR> u,r• R• -•$ _ /!\ C r :: •;'bf 9r ��+ .' •vex,$ r — eoyr^ IJ'W u1,1. • • Y ... N``• a • rld, •Je^+ $sf. +e.� Nn ,do N aV ., N ' .•y ,. a Y^ • b�i�� .ix�s •• S :L �;1, �'9rn, "a�n je O1xrt • a '�' DRIVE+ 'xY• • I ■ • r• 8 '" . • <y,.y Ti i • N oo C1 -t• n. ea rxr. xa •a` �,rM c g Z • � 4 4 s!'r• '. • •'z•�: I'Q�'G n�a ' .q •^AL �. 's Yr: �f[ Vie: e y _ 'S'/ y u XPi • "^'•5 ti > w • � �� •.r�\_,;.•.X941• :� xYur y i I S d+'x vv C\ "4 N • Y 4: M.. • . 5 Z 11 � . • n\y � •1}.04 aa� e.. aH.,oi 1 b/Ih It - L•• N o +:1 B o ,•rr J ,d[ d .,,• b r, a. •x > /i > .° s b-,. Y Ci b,y • + Ayl ., •! . ..bS oBr nyr >ary .."�,A•' �w�• k� •erg ;"r m URT dL IR r " ^, °, ,•, rsx mor a• i•,:o i/L. c- �'• s* ,boy y� + • N f B "� Y .S ,. • �Ii Y uT. _ rx-,J � i'"� • b - •°b r 4 •'3 r,- r � • •° c R lS a, P ��• Y 1• yY• •, Y' e'e!y4 ., .r°,'Po+ N 0 = .. ,•. , C,gMeq o •xe� ,�,�y •i •. 'y°4•'y- Se. i -vs,ua • !i e ' AOo fa0o : b; 41,' ppI b 4 I1��r Lp e�, /.G' RO. D.na.-- -:: P.ia C:• Yy1 - iJ-�,'• ; ff• '^ !. ,`. •'+har. a,m a �` u s V, X^ Yry. •aow �•, .. • Y• 'w 're.rwu- s•'vmY'`N r:S z 3 yA ,a .7 bw •r9. �• X96 x: "'•are $. • .$ AT' • r _ . v .{ ,+ z _ g el: ax•.x Y Y • t j [ r n' [r• x• oe CD O ca 1 O J 'N `< co 0 O O a) I m 00N O 0) D-onald Donahue 10-84352-100-01 —20 .... . AIN Ss TY - �i I )rouRrHT G.,sl RU YD. ER DOC.NO. ;81033 N I iWt? ss'e fR Lj 23 20 I 725 21 19 lx, F w 16 -0.. I POND IEP 1917 VILDMARK 2 21 ..e �.w "I • z 52 10 12 IT I" fi 16 RUN -' z D I 3 Rio BIC. 10 11 1 U S .City of Eogah 030-00 015_�52 - POND A 7 lot. b'h 016-52 Agenda Information Memo August_20, 1985, City.Council Meeting Page Two A. FIRE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under the Fire Department at this time. B. POLICE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered for the Police Department at this time. C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT • Please see the Informative Memo for the Parks and Recreation Department's Compost Program Report. The Director of Paiks and Recreation will be at the City Council meeting on Tuesday and will be available to field questions at that time. D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Woodhaven Addition - Request for Building Permit Prior to Final Plat Recording -- Enclosed on page., is a request received from Mr. Terry Stover requesting consideration for the issuance of building permits prior to recording of the final plat. Final plat approval is scheduled for favorable Council action under the Consent Agenda. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the request • for building permits prior to the recording of the final plat for the Woodhaven Addition. 2. Contract 85-5 (Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer), Resolution Requesting MnDOT Cost Participation -- In the feasibility report for Project 428 which discussed the installation of the trunk storm sewer through the Cedar Industrial Park, this trunk storm sewer will be providing drainage of certain state owned lands and rights-of-way. Previous discussion with MnDOT indicates that they have agreed to participate for their proportionate share of run-off into our storm sewer system. However, this requires a formal resolution to be passed by Council action requesting MnDOT cost participation so that they can prepare the appropriate agreements for formal Council approval at a later date. A copy of the resolution will be provided for Council's review and consideration at the meeting on August 20. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To pass a resolution request- ing MnDOT cost participation for Project 428 (Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm sewer) under City Contract 85-5 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. CZ Eagan City Council Dear Mayor and Council Members: wcoo Mgve" Aboir,ov August 10, 1985 It is my request that you will, along with final plat approval, grant a building permit (subject to the Building Department plan approval) to commence immediately with construction. This is a very small project that is being developed as a zero lot line developement and this would allow us to survey the footings and foundation walls after the basement is complete. The granting of this request would make the final platting considerably easier and would save approximately four to five weeks of valuable construction time and allow the project to be finalized before winter closes in. It should be noted that all of the city requirements (developement contract, plans and cash escrow) have been met and upon the start of construction the survey will be completed and immediately sent to the county for final platting. Thank you for your consideration, '=q�n _':� . Terry E Stover W1 RECEIVED AUG - 9 19ff Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Three 3. Project 449, Country Club Market - Landscaping -- The Public Works Director has been contacted by Mr. Bob Nelson, the operations manager for the Country Club Market, expressing his total objection to the project recently approved by Council action on July 16, 1985. They strenously object to the extension of the driveway as providing no benefit to their property. In addition, they will resist any attempt to acquire the temporary easements necessary to eliminate the existing island located near their loading docks. Mr. Nelson also states that the proposal for the driveway extension was not originally proposed under Project 373 (storm sewer and driveway) which eliminated the rural ditch section and where the landscaping was originally proposed to be installed in front of the Country Club Market. They feel that an additional burden is being placed on them due to their noncompliance with performing the landscaping that was agreed to by Mr. Sheldon Kranz, who is no longer with that company. I response, Mr. Nelson has submitted a letter enclosed on page n wherein they will agree to proceed with the landscaping previously proposed by the Council with certain conditions and the understanding that the recently approved project will not proceed. This item should be discussed in detail so that proper direction can be given to the Public Works Director for response to Country Club Market. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the request from Country Club Market pertaining to Project 449 and provide direction to the staff regarding progress of this project. • 4 E �.'Qounlry SlnF 3&rkr1 C�IIun#r Club �arhet 4 nr_ 1 THREE THOUSAND FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 612-920-9337 F.ErEt'dED JVd August 8, 1985 Mr. Tom Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Mr. Colbert: Country Club Market, Inc. will agree to pay up to $3,000.00 for landscaping for the purpose of screening the back of our stores loading dock area at 3820 Sibley Memorial Highway. Country Club will only agree to this if the City of Eagan installs the landscaping and guarantees the growth of these plantings. In the event snowplowing, road salt, etc. damage or kills any of these plantings, Country Club Market, Inc. will not be held responsible for replanting or replacement of this area. BN: dm Sincerely, Bob Nelson Operations Manager Country Club Market, Inc. Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Four There are ( 13 ) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed form the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS Personnel Items --Item 1. Park Maintenance Worker --A vacancy was created with the resignation of Doug Berans, Park Maintenance • Worker. The Parks & Recreation Department is recommending that Richard Pelletier be hired to fill his vacancy. Mr. Pelletier has successfully completed the City's physical examination requirement. His startinq date is 8/26. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Mr. Pelletier as a Park Maintenance Worker. Personnel Items --Item 2. Planning Intern --The City Planner is recommending that Steven Schwanke be hired as Planning Intern. The position is temporary with an expected six (6) month duration and it will pay $6 -hour (standard intern rate) with no benefits. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Steven Schwanke as a Planning Intern effective Sept. 3, 1985. • CONTRACTOR LICENSE B. Contractor License --Enclosed on page is a list of contractors .who are renewing or who have b en selected and retained as a builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside in Eagan. They have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor license as presented. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES - August 20, 1985 General Contractor 1. B.B.K. Construction 2. Construction Association 3. Greenwaldt Construction, Inc. 4. Nordaas American Homes 5. RMC Development Corporation 6. Sonnek Construction Co., Inc. Homeowners • 1. Gerald Leimer 2. James R. Mach Heating & Ventilating 1. Fred Plaas Plbg. & Htg. Masonry, Cement Work 1. Graybow-Daniels Company Plumbing • 1. Fignar Plumbing 2. Fred Plaas Plbg. & Htg. 3. Rascher Plbg & Htg. 4. Abrahamson Plumbing Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Five EXCAVATION PERMIT/BRITTANY 9TH ADDN. C. Excavation Permit #EX33-155, Brittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) -- we have received a request from Tollefson Builders to proceed with the excavation and grading necessary for the proposed Brittany 9th Addition incorporating approximately 10 acres. All application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Excavation Permit #EX33-155 (Brittany 9th Addition) to Tollefson Builders, Inc. • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Six PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/BRITTANY 9TH ADDN. D. Project 459, Receive Petition/Authorize a Feasibility Report (Brittany 9th Addition - Streets & Utilities) -- We have received a petition requesting the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed development of the Brittany 9th Addition which is an easterly extention of Sherwood Way into John Brown's property. Both the developer and the property owner have signed the petition and have guaranteed all costs associated with this report if the project is not approved at the time of public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for Project 459 (Brittany 9th Addition - streets and utilities). • FEASIBILITY REPORT (NICOLS ROAD - STREETS) E. Project 460, Authorize Feasibility Report (Nicols Road - Streets) -- Nicols Road, which is currently classified as Dakota County Road #23, is scheduled to be turned back to the City of Eagan in 1986. As a condition of that turnback, the County will be responsible for upgrading this road to current standards for similar County roads. This relates to the County providing a 2" bituminous overlay to the existing roadway. However, due to the fact that the existing base and bituminous surface has lost its structural stability, this bituminous overlay would • not last the length of time necessary to recover this capital expenditure. Due to the increased traffic volume that this street is experiencing, it is anticipated that it will have to be upgraded to City urban standards within the next 1 - 3 years. In order to make use of the County's financial obligation, the Public Works Director is requesting authorization from the City Council to prepare a feasibility report in hopes that the upgrading of Nicols Road could be initiated during 1986 so that the County could participate in the construction cost in an amount equivalent to their bituminous overlay obligation. It is also felt that with the upgrading of Nicols Road, it will alleviate a lot of the traffic volume currently using Rahn Road which should help to extend its remaining days before reconstruction is required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the feasibility report for Project 468 (Nicols Road - streets). 0 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seven FINAL PLAT/WOODHAVEN ADDN. F. Final Plat Approval, Woodhaven Addition (Terry Stover) -- We have received an, application for final plat approval for the Woodhaven Addition which is located on the southeast corner of Beau De Rue Drive and Rahn Road. The proposed final plat as referenced on page /I is in conformance with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on July 16, 1985. All final plat application materials have been executed, submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration for Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat • application for the Woodhaven Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • /O WOODHAAEN EXHIBIT "A" STOMA SURVEYING SERVICES ]iY 6nn Y.imru� n.on •�0 fib', � jl � +.� 9 o ^ a ? 9+=11�00�1O1P \�y 3 p � 1 E I I qpy I 5 Y I Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eight FINAL PLAT/UPS 1ST ADDN G. Final Plat Approval, UPS 1st Addition (United Parcel Service, Inc.) -- We have received an application for the final plat approval of the UPS lst Addition located east of T.H. 149 and north of Becker Road (County Road 63A). The final plat, enclosed on page _�� _ , is in conformance with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on March 19, 1985. All final plat application materials have been executed, submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable consideration by Council action. While there has been some concerns by various parties pertaining to the required acquisition of ponding easements and street rights-of-way prior to final plat approval, the devel- oper's agreement incorporated this development's • /responsibility as identified by the excerpt contained on page(s)./3 -/(o . • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the UPS 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • EXHIBIT A• U.P.S. 1ST ADDITION fC.LI IN I[Cr TNI [.IR .1N[ .I ,[1r1ex ,!. IOY1rs." a,. RRx4[ I . I..,l...[o ro ..yt . e1....0 01 10•1.st•[. oe.ar[s v2..C. e1 H1.1" ..ox ..... IMF 'IF....Rx 10 CY .[m,n.I.O..0 sou. •--•—• eexmn...... oI .... Is 0[011.1[0 r0 ...m• I...11. HEDLUND ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 EMEETE ` v. Yy.l ,f ` x.11 .0 Ob .q•.ne\i. 1 ayII-Io T>a:.EE .^OJ :E NO A 4e so'.f —gVell '' a N C1TF Is RIP Lor r L: Q• ..'pu'�a•Iw, iY OUTLOT E N .L� 10: i W.. .... IEXCEPTION E.CEPTION \` . } C8E yy 112 SS \\\ y?� GOTLGT. DETAIL .. = :� CG ME. GlaCiNCP�bOAD �•y i EXCEPTION 3 T.r fC.LI IN I[Cr TNI [.IR .1N[ .I ,[1r1ex ,!. IOY1rs." a,. RRx4[ I . I..,l...[o ro ..yt . e1....0 01 10•1.st•[. oe.ar[s v2..C. e1 H1.1" ..ox ..... IMF 'IF....Rx 10 CY .[m,n.I.O..0 sou. •--•—• eexmn...... oI .... Is 0[011.1[0 r0 ...m• I...11. HEDLUND ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 EMEETE ` v. Yy.l ,f ` x.11 .0 Ob .q•.ne\i. 1 ayII-Io A 4e so'.f '' a N C1TF Lor r N BLOCK 1 IEXCEPTION E.CEPTION \` a'a[Sk SS DETAIL .. = :� CG ME. GlaCiNCP�bOAD �•y i EXCEPTION 3 T.r sQ.a4.�___L _Lw la_.n•rv-•��`.TL1.=., a.ETAIM \e 3. \ I•u•, Is www CE IOx .1u ,j (r iey..t 4 i ra7l�u �F fC.LI IN I[Cr TNI [.IR .1N[ .I ,[1r1ex ,!. IOY1rs." a,. RRx4[ I . I..,l...[o ro ..yt . e1....0 01 10•1.st•[. oe.ar[s v2..C. e1 H1.1" ..ox ..... IMF 'IF....Rx 10 CY .[m,n.I.O..0 sou. •--•—• eexmn...... oI .... Is 0[011.1[0 r0 ...m• I...11. HEDLUND ENGINEERING SHEET 2 OF 2 EMEETE grading and drainage plan shall include lot and building elevations, drainage awales to be sodded, storm sewer, catch basins;:erosion control structures and ponding areas necessary to conform with the overall City storm sewer plan, and shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to final plat approval. The grading of the site shall be completed in conformance vith'the approved grading, drainage aria erosion control plat prepared by Henningson, Durham and Richardson dated March 22, 1985, and shall be completed by September 10, 1985: In the event that the developer fails to complete the grading of the site in conformance with the approved grading and drainage plan by the stipulated date, the City may declare the Developer in default pursuant to paragraph 8 Is "Default by Developer" herein. The Developer shall provide, in the final plat, five-foot drainage and utility easements adjacent to all common property lines excluding party wall lot lines and ten -foot drainage and utility easements across the front of each lot adjacent to a public right-of-way or adjacent to any lot lines not common to other lots of this addition. Additional utility and drainage easements which may be required by the City shall appear on the final plat or be dedicated by an acceptable document as approved by the City prior to final • plat approval. _. This development shall dedicate on the final lat a (outlot B) p ponding easement,/as approved by the City, incorporating 135.0 acre feet of storage volume for City designated pond GP -5 in accordance with the approved grading plan prepared by Henningson, Durham and Richardson dated March 22, 1985. In addition, the owner and developer shall be responsible for the acquisition of the ponding easements, as approved by the City, incorporating 19.4 acre feet of storage volume for City designated pond GP -9, and the roadway easements necessary for the upgrading of County Road 63A ( Becker �1 5 Road) as required by the final design approved by the City of Eagan and the Dakota County Highway Department. If the aeveloper ana owner cannot provide these required easements or rights-of-way, they may request City assistance. If requested in writing, the City of Eagan shall attempt to acquire said pdnding easement for GP -9 and street easements or rights-of-way for Co. Rd. 63A (Becker Road ) through negotiations with the respective property owners so affected. If these easements and rights-of-way are acquired through a _ negotiated settlement (including a transfer in lieu of condemnation) which is agreeable to the parties 1. involved, the owner ana developer shall be • responsible for the financial obligation so agreed upon by the owner and developer. If the City is unable to acquire said Pond GP -9 and Co. Rd. 63A easements through negotiations, then it shall proceed to acquire these easements and rights-of-way by condemnation. If so acquired, the owner and developer of the UPS 1st addition shall be financially responsible for all costs incurred by the City of Eagan condemnation award, including appraisal costs, engineering, planning and attorney's fees and costs. Such costs shall be spread equally on a per acre basis ana assessed against UPS lst Addition. The owner and developer waive any and all rights to public hearings, notice of hearings and any objections relating to any acquisition costs being spread as special assessments. All acquisition ana/or dedication of required easements and rights-of-way for GP -9. and Co. Rd. 63A shall be completed by the owner and developer ana conveyed to the City by September 15, 1985, after which time the City shall initiate acquisition through condemnation with or without the developer's written request. E. Street Signs. The Developer shall oe financially responsible for the installation of street identification signs and non-mechanical and non - /_15, 6 EXHIBIT A U.P.S. 1ST ADDITION N 1 �[. YE.T1ox • °� • • i Si DETAIL (r•wr.. a5 E.CE.TIOe1••� E.CE ION p`• �� I APPID FOX PROPERTY —? ILA01M4 PWM s•".•.:��'.."... I�,i`,• ,� I� w•na.( Iii BERM a... i .tE7 POND •L •.,r.r�... y1,; as•°4 CiT.4 o.. , ourEor a —Z'--•-J.Ini'.'(inJ.��. 03. Sa"IYV �Y1'•• 1.7. BLOCK 1 i ounor • 1` N 1 �[. YE.T1ox • °� • • i Si DETAIL (r•wr.. a5 E.CE.TIOe1••� E.CE ION .m ..co. I1..�+9y.a.. 1.1 9.91 .I.a 01 IECr,o. ,a. ro.4.V ...O 03. .1 uau.aD ro n.ra . pd....1 o. Co•.4'Ea'E o(..t11 ...,.1. a,..,.(n.80. nu.1.1 w V... go .1 cn n.r... .. wq .—.—. o1..11..r ."M- sm,W,* ro s..ou 1ou.rr of Norge •OCa,C..rao.[Call' 'fX� HEDLUND / ENGiNEERINO " n.r. mew W as•°4 CiT.4 o.. , ,°..+'{I LOT I —Z'--•-J.Ini'.'(inJ.��. 03. Sa"IYV �Y1'•• 1.7. BLOCK 1 i .m ..co. I1..�+9y.a.. 1.1 9.91 .I.a 01 IECr,o. ,a. ro.4.V ...O 03. .1 uau.aD ro n.ra . pd....1 o. Co•.4'Ea'E o(..t11 ...,.1. a,..,.(n.80. nu.1.1 w V... go .1 cn n.r... .. wq .—.—. o1..11..r ."M- sm,W,* ro s..ou 1ou.rr of Norge •OCa,C..rao.[Call' 'fX� HEDLUND / ENGiNEERINO Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nine VACATION/PETITION/PUBLIC HEARING/MEADOWLANDS ADDN. H. Vacation of Drainage & Utility Easements, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Meadowlands Addition) -- We have received a petition requesting the vacation of common lot line drainage and utility easements for Lots 101-104 of Block 1, Meadowland 1st Addition. These four lots are bordered by Rahn Road on the west, Shale Lane on the south and Bear Path Trail on the east. This request is based on the proposed development of the Eagles Nest complex which has received preliminary plat approval on June 18, 1985, by Council action. One of the conditions of that approval was the vacation of these referenced common lot line drainage and utility easements. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and schedule the public hearing to be held on September 17, 1985. • /7 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Ten CONTRACT 84-20, FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE/CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PK. I. Contract 84-20, Final Payment/Acceptance (Cedar Cliff Commercial Park - Streets & Utilities -- We have received a request for final payment from our consulting engineers along with a certifica- tion of compliance to City approved plans and specifications for the installation of streets and utilities to the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park under the above -referenced contract. All final inspections have been performed and verified by representatives of the Public Works Department. It is recommended that final payment be issued with City acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the fifth and • final payment for Contract 84-20 (Cedar Cliff Commercial Park) for $32,924.76 to Spencer Construction, Inc., and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance. FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/MISC. PROJECTS J. Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Miscel- laneous Projects) -- Final costs have been tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared for the following projects: Project # Location #348 Coachman/Four Oaks Road #371B South Coachman Road • #398 Sun Cliff 2nd Addition #399 Silver Bell Road #400 Oak Cliff Addition #404 Lexington Place South Lexington Place 2nd Addn. #410 Lone Oak Road #411 Birch Park Addition Patrick Eagan Park #415 Cedar Cliff Commercial Pk. Description Streets Streets Streets & Utilities Streets Trunk Storm Sewer Utilities Trunk Storm Sewer Trunk Storm Sewer Streets & Utilities It is recommended that these final assessment rolls be received and that a public hearing be scheduled for September 17, 1985. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assess- ment rolls as listed and order the final assessment hearing to be held on September 17, 1985. Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eleven DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AMENDMENTS/TIME EXTENSIONS/MISC. DEVELOPMENTS K. Development Contract Amendments - Time Extensions for Public Improvements (Miscellaneous Developments) -- Several developments throughout the City have not met the completion dates for the completion of the installation of required public improvements as established in their Development Contract Agreement executed at the time of final plat approval. The following is a listing of those developments identifying their original completion date, the developers requested extension date and the staff's recommendation. The -staff does not recommend that any extension date be approved beyond October 1 to allow adequate time for the City to perform any remaining incompleted work before adverse weather conditions prohibit its completion prior to the end • of the construction season. Development Sunset 4th (84-I) Blackhawk Oaks (84-R) Berkshire Ponds (84-B) Century Addn. (84-N) Developer Agreement Completion Date Tri -Land, Inc. Norse Development Derrick Land Co. Don Klobar Requested Staff's Ext. Date Recommendatio 8-1-84 10-30-85 10-1-85 11-18-84 9-15-85 9-15-85 6-15-85 9-15-85 9-15-85 9-1-84 10-1-85 10-1-85 The Development Contract Agreement requires extensions of completion dates to be amended by Council action. All of these extension dates are necessary for the completion of the bituminous wearing surface. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendments to the respective Development Contract Agreements providing • for an extension of the completion of public improvements as recommended by staff. /17 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twelve NOTICE OF DEFAULT/INTENT TO FILE ON BOND/MISC. DEVELOPMENTS L. Notice of Default/Intent to File on Performance Bond (Century Addition and Crossroads of Eagan) -- The following subdivisions have not completed the installation of public improvements within the time frame agreed to in the Development Contract Agreements executed at the time of final plat approval. Notices were sent to the responsible parties for these developments informing them of their noncompliance requesting their response identifying their recommended course of action. As of this date, the following developments have not responded to our requests providing a revised time schedule for consideration by staff and Council. Subsequently, the staff is recommending that these developments • be found in default of the Development Contract Agreement and that they be given formal notice to complete their improvements by the specified date. This will allow the City to complete the project after that date and file against their financial security which was submitted with the Development Agreement at the time of final plat approval. Development Crossroads of Eagan (84-V) Century Addition Agreement Completion Developer _ Date Dan Gustafson Riverdale Development 8-1-85 9-1-84 Final Date For Default 9-15-85 9-15-85 The incompleted items for these developments relates to the final bituminous surfacing and related restoration. •ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To declare the developers in default of the contract agreements for Crossroads of Eagan and the Century Addition and authorize a filing against the financial security after September 15, 1985. 20 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen CHANGE ORDER #2 FOR PROJECT 85-14 M. Change Order #2 for Project 85-14, Parks Improvement Contract -- The City has received a request for Change Order #2, Project 85-14 for the Parks Improvement Contract which is being handled by Central Landscaping, Inc. This change order provides payment to the contractor for costs incurred for materials and labor not included within the original improvement contract totalling $13,931.15. The change order consists of four (4) subparts which include 1) a change in the sanitary sewer service at a cost of $3,263. 2) Shoreline excavation and clean up as a result of storm water run-off at a cost of $3,420. Rock excavation and installation of a sanitary sewer at Schwanz Lake Park at $690. Finally, the remainder of the change order is a result of additional • work associated with the shaping and reberming of areas within the various parks. The change order also includes bituminous overlay correction for trails at walnut Hill Park as a result of unstable soils. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize Change Order #2 to Project 85-14 (park improvements). • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen VACATION/DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS/SUN CLIFF 5TH ADDN. A. Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement - Sun Cliff 5th Addition -- On July 16, the Council received a petition requesting the vacation of a common lot line drainage and utility easement located within Lot 14, Block 3, of Sun Cliff 5th Addition as located and described on page y3 This vacation is required due to the relocation of lot lines associated with the Sun Cliff 5th Addition. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to Is this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the drainage and utility easement as described for Lot 14, Block 3, Sun Cliff 5th Addition. Zv C. R. WINDEN 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. SKETCH S DESCRIPTION LAND SURVEYORS Tel 64S•3646 OF: 1381 EUSTIS ST., ST. PAUL, MINN. S5104 Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation FOR: Advance Developers, Inc. 4~Di (20 >r /0 A\16' 49\ \ nhl0 n� Scale: 1": 30' Any di-ainage.and utility -easement, located on. Lot-14-;i� Block- 3, Sun C11ff. Fifth Addition, Dakota Countv', t4ihnesota which. does- not- lie!---. within the!Southea"st 10.00,feet,.the'Northwest 10:00 feet, the Northeast•5.00-feet or'-.the,Southwest.5:0a..feet of -said Lot 14. I hereby certify that this survey. plan. or report was prepared by me or under my direct super` vision and that 1 am a duly Re;tistered Land Surveyor un.l, r the laws of the Mate of Blinn• esots. Date 7-//-a5 Rne. -4n, /t.G-7a Survey Drawn_ A- (r. Checked Approvek. Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen IDB FUNDING/KNOB HILL PROFESSIONAL PARK B. Public Hearing to Consider IDB Funding in the Amount of $400,000 for a 7,000 Square Foot Office Building in Knob Hill Professional Park (Richard Nordlund)--A public hearing was set at the July 16, 1985, City Council meeting to consider a request from Richard Nordlund on behalf of Ed Dunn and KHPP Partnership for industrial revenue bond financing in the amount of $400,000 to construct a 7,000 square foot office building. The office building is proposed for Knob Hill Professional Park, Lot 6, • which is located on the northwest side of the Diffley Road/Pilot Knob Road intersection. All land use requirements are satisfied, realizing that proper zoning and platting exist on the property. Enclosed on pages _.25_ through j�is a copy of the application which includes an architect's rendering of the office building as proposed. The City has maintained a $500,000 minimum for consideration of industrial revenue bond financing. Since this request is in the amount of $400,000, it would be necessary for the City Council to waive this requirement. At the time guidelines were drawn, there were concerns that every fast food restaurant may desire industrial revenue financing which the City Council determined not to be a good public use of IDB funding. Also, the City's fiscal consultant advised the community that $500,000 was a rule of thumb for making a project feasible in terms of the expenses that were incurred for industrial revenue financing. • This project meets the 258 rent requirement for renting space to Eagan Realty (Ed Dunn) for their real estate office space. It is expected that approximately 10 new jobs, with an estimated payroll of $250,000, will occupy the space. The Economic Development Commission has recently reviewed various State Economic Development incentive programs and one of the few programs left for the small business is industrial revenue financing which they endorse as a Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the industrial revenue financng in the amount of $400,000 for the KHPP Partnership located at Knob Hill Professional Park, Lot 6, in the amount of $400,000. a�- • lJ CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 APPLICATION FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE FINANCING REVIEW BUSINESS NAME: KHPP Partnership MINIMUM SIZE:$500,000 LOCATION: Knob Hill Professional Park Lot 6 LAND: $ BUSINESS FORM: Partnership BUILDING: $ 300,000 REPRESENTATIVE: Ed Dunn EQUIPMENT: $ PHONE: 452-1561 OTHER: $ 100,000 NATURE OF BUSINESS: Real Estate TOTAL: $ 400,000 Development Date: June 25, 1985 DETAILED COST BREAKDOWN: Land Acquisition and Site Development (Will not be financed by IDB): Construction Contracts Equipment Acquisition & Installation Architectural & Engineering Fees Legal Fees Interest During Construction Initial Bond Reserve Contingencies Bond Discount Other $ 100,000 350.000 10.000 20,000 10.000 5.000 Total with Land $ 500.000 Total without Land $ 400.000 HISTORY OF APPLICANT 1. Have you ever been in bankruptcy? NO 2. Have you ever defaulted on any bond or mortgage commitment? C2$ INFORMATION CONCERNING APPLICANT'S PROPOSED PROJECT 1. PROPOSED LOCATION (ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION) Knob Hill Professional Park 2. NEW FACILITY OR EXPANSION? 3. INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL/RETAIL? Commercial office 4. ESTIMATE NUMBER OF NEW JOBS 10 ESTIMATED PAYROLL 250,000 • 5. IS THIS SITE PROPERTY ZONED & ARE UTILITIES AVAILABLE? 6. ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL SALES Office rents 66,000 7. POTENTIAL OTHER USES OF FACILITY This will be office space that ,nuld fit any -small office user 8. WILL THERE BE MORE THAN ONE PHASE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT? • 9. EXPLAIN HOW THIS FACILITY WILL NOT COMPETE WITH OTHER LOCAL COMPANIES This office will be the new office for Eagen Realty plus some additional rental space 10. WHAT WILL FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS BE; WILL THE FACILITY BE A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP? KHPP Partnership is an existing partnership that owns the underlying land. Date: 6/25/85Signed: (Title): MY 0 • �4 3. Have you applied for conventional financing? Yes, but the lenders want floating rate which would be much higher costs. 4. What are your future plans? To continue to develop the remaining sites. 5. List financial references: a. Dick Stevenson b. Richard J. Nordlund 6. When will the construction period begin? Start: 8/15/85 Finish: 12/01/85 • 7. Other comments: • �4 0 ro 0 z 0 a 0 Ir r r z 0 0 0 0 P I L 0 T K N 0 B I R 0 A 0 V.%Ftm M 0 0 In FIRST FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN -- P11CM."13I_I>t' 01=11=ICIE 131_17(;. IS\1t)13 Ii 11_I_ lml:t"1=13SS 140 pial_ IMiOlkRIS • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/WERNER LEMBKE C. Public Hearing for Renewal of Conditional Use Permit/Werner Lembke, Lot 1, Block 1, Lembke 1st Addition --A public hearing is scheduled to allow Mr. Werner Lembke an opportunity to discuss his compliance with a conditional use permit that was denied renewal at the July 16, 1985, City Council meeting. It was the opinion of the City Attorney that a formal public hearing be held giving Mr. Lembke an opportunity to address the City Council prior to any final decision regarding the renewal of his condi- tional use permit. Mr. Gordon C. Moosbrugger was retained by Mr. Lembke and has contacted the City staff on numerous occasions to review the files regarding this matter. For additional informa- tion on the Conditional Use Permit renewal, refer to a letter that was prepareq by the City Attorney's office enclosed on pages throughstatus and a copy of a report from the City Planner updating the of the Conditional Use Permit found on page J6. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny renewal of the conditional use permit for Werner Lembke. 31 PAUL H. HAUOE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN W. EIDE RALPH W. COREY Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 HAIIGE, SmiTH & EIDE, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 9808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN, MINNESOTA 63122 July 24, 1985 • Re: Werner Lembke — Conditional Use Permit Renewal Dear Tom: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 404.4224 This letter is in response to a situation which now exists following the City Council action on July 16, 1985 regarding the renewal of Mr. Lembke's conditional use permit. The following is a brief history of the Lembke situation: July, 1980 — conditional use permit issued to Mr. Lembke regarding outside storage. April 19, 1983 — Development Contract entered into regarding Lembke First Addition which outlines 11 conditions to be met by Mr. Lembke. • April 2, 1985 — Following a series of complaints from neighboring landowners, the Eagan City Council directed the enforcement of the conditional use permit issued to Mr. Lembke and he was notified of the provisions of which he was in violation. June 4, 1985 — A letter was sent to Mr. Lembke notifying him that he was not in compliance with his conditional use permit and that a review of that permit was scheduled for the City Council on June 18, 1985. The letter also noted that should he not be able to comply, his conditional use permit would be revoked. June 18, 1985 — Mr. Lembke appeared at the Council meeting and stated it would take approximately two months to comply with the requirements of his conditional use permit. The Council voted to continue consideration of the proposed cancellation of the conditional use permit until the July 16, 1985, meeting. July 16, 1985 — Mr. Lembke did not appear at this meeting and based upon his failure to be in compliance with the conditions of his conditional use permit the Council voted not to renew Mr. Lembke's conditional use permit. Mr. Thomas L. Hedges July 24, 1985 Page 2 Eagan City Code Section 11.40, Subd. 4E provides that a violation of any condition of a conditional use permit is a violation of the Code and automatically terminates the conditional use permit. Although this does not require a hearing to be held prior to revocation of the permit, the fact that Mr. Lembke was provided notice of both the June 18 and July 16 meetings at which the conditional use permit was discussed would presumably overcome any challenge that Mr. Lemke did not have notice that the renewal of his conditional use permit was under review. This issue of formal notice, however, could be an objection in a formal legal action. Enforcement • At this time several options exist for the City regarding enforcement of their action on July 16. 1. Criminal Prosecution. According to the City Code noncompliance with the terms of the conditional use permit is a misdemeanor offense and could subject the person to criminal penalties. A prosecution of this type was attempted by the City of Bloomington in State v. Larson Transfer, 246 N.W.2d 176 (1974) with little success. The Minnesota Supreme Court held that noncompliance with a conditional use permit is more analagous to a breach of a contract rather than a criminal offense and that criminal prosecution under the Bloomington Ordinance in that case was not allowed. It should be noted that the Eagan City Code clearly authorizes criminal sanctions while Bloomington ordinance did not. Should Mr. Lembke continue operations without a permit, criminal prosecution could also result from that activity. • 2. Injunctive Relief. A. The City could move for either a temporary restraining order or a temporary injunction to prohibit Mr. Lembke from operating his business without compliance with the City's conditions. In order to obtain a temporary injunction the City would need to show the following: 1. The probability of success on the merits of the case; 2. Immediate and irreparable injury to the City if a temporary injunction is denied; 3. The liklihood that no permanent injury would result to the Defendant by granting a temporary injunction; 4. The public interest in granting the temporary injunction. 33 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges July 24, 1985 Page 3 B. Another option is a mandatory temporary injunction. This would command Mr. Lembke to do an affirmative act such as comply with the conditions of the conditional use permit. These are generally granted only in cases of extreme emergency and where it is certain that .--conditions could be imposed to safeguard the Defendant. It is unlikely that a case of extreme emergency could be made by the City and the best course would be to request an injunction to prohibit further operation until Mr. Lembke was in compliance with the conditions. A motion for temporary injunction is initiated by a • request to the Court in the form of a Notice of Motion and Motion and service upon the Defendant of that notice. 3. The City could again contact Mr. Lembke and attempt to work out a suitable timetable for compliance with the City's conditions. Given Mr. Lembke's reluctance in the past to comply, however, this may not be effective. It is our understanding that a Certificate of Deposit was posted with the City in the amount of $2,000.00 to guarantee landscaping. It would appear that this C.D. has been forfeited but mailed notice of forfeiture should be sent to Mr. Lembke. A decision as to whether notice and a new hearing should be scheduled and should be made shortly. V y tr ly yours, • HAUGE SMITH b ;IDS, P.A. PHH:ras '5� MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: AUGUST 15, 1985 SUBJECT: UPDATE ON WERNER LEMBKE -.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT On August 14, 1985, I met with Mr. Gordon Moosbrugger, the attorney representing Mr. Werner Lembke. In this meeting we reviewed the conditions of the conditional use permit and also the memorandum dated .July 10, 1985. This memo was the memo submitted to the City Council on the conditions which had not been complied with. After this meeting we viewed the site as to the status of the conditions- of- the conditional use permit—and- as to what - had been-- - — complied with. While Mr. Lembke has done a considerable amount of work to clean up the site, the conditions existing as of the July 10, 1985 memo are pretty much in tact, that is a clean up has been done but no capital improvement has been completed as • of this date. The applicant has an understanding as to what is expected of him and his attorney has indicated that 1) the 'conditions will be contractually agreed to if the conditional use permit is extended or 2) would like to discuss the options regarding these conditions and the status of the permit with the City Council on August 20, 1985. +,C� City Planner DCR/kf �J • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen UPS BUILDING PERMIT A. UPS Building Permit -- On July 16, the City Council reviewed a request from Mr. Paul Addison, representing UPS, requesting the issuance of a building permit for their facility prior to the final plat approval process. After extended discussion, the Council authorized the issuance of a building permit for 30 days (to August 15) to allow them to complete their final plat application process. As previously discussed under the Consent Agenda, they have satisfactorily complied with the final plat application process in submitting all required materials and documents within the required time frame. If the Council wishes to allow the progression of the construction of this facility, it should take specific action regarding authorization to issue a building permit prior to the recording of the final plat documents at Dakota County. Special Note: The City had not received all of the final plat documents by closing hours on August 15. Therefore, a letter was sent by the City Administrator to the UPS project manager stating the temporary building permit could no longer be honored. A copy of that letter is enclosed on page -,,3�. The Development Agreement was received early Friday morning along will all other documents and did satisfy all of the City's requirements. Therefore, the temporary building permit was reinstated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the issuance of a building permit for the UPS facility within the UPS 1st Addition prior to the recording of the final plat at Dakota County. J6 of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. RO- BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 August 15, 1985 MR PAUL MARKHAM, PROJ MGR UPS 555 BECKER ROAD EAGAN MN 55123 Re: Building Permit for United Parcel Service Dear Mr. Markhum: BEA SLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Ca Mfl Members THOMAS HEDGES City Aammi aior EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE GN Clerk In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on July 16, 1985, there was a motion passed that granted a temporary building permit for a 30 -day period and if the final plat was not completed and submitted with the accompaning requirements to the staff's satisfaction, then the building construction would cease; further, all necessary require- ments would be submitted to the City by August 15, 1985, for final approval by the City Council at its August 20, 1985, meeting. To date, our Director of Public Works has not received all the necessary documents and I am sorry to impose any delay, however, as of Friday, August 16, 1985, the City cannot honor the temporary building permit that was approved by our City Council. If all the documents are received to the satisfaction of our Director of Public Works, the City's Building Inspection Department has been instructed to honor the temporary building permit until final plat and building permit are considered at the August 20, 1985, meeting.' - If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact Mr. Tom `Colbert, our Director of Public Works, or Doug Reid, Assistant Building Inspector. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Doug Reid, Assistant Building Inspector TLH/kf THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 31 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen IDB ENTITLEMENT FUNDING B. IDB Entitlement Funding --At the last regular City Council meeting, a status report was given regarding industrial development revenue bond entitlement funding for the City of Eagan. The City of Eagan's entitlement for 1985 is $10,012,399. To date, the only application for IDB funding is the Dick Nordlund applica- tion in the amount of $900,000. This leave a balance of $9,612,399 available to the City of Eagan. Since the last City Council meeting, City Hall was contacted regarding a potential development that may request $1,200,000, however, the development is quite sketchy at this time. They were told that a 1% application fee would be required in order to guarantee the IDB funding. • Cities that have expressed interest for IDB money were contacted by the Administrator's office. A status report on those cities contacted is as follows: Blaine Possibly $1.1 million and will know by August 22. Would be prepared to process the necessary resolutions. Crystal No longer requires the funding. Mound No longer requires the funding. Savage Will know by August 20 whether they could use approximately $2 million and would also process all the necessary resolutions. • Brooklyn Center Could use approximately $2.5 million and would process the paperwork. Maple Grove Is in need of approximately $2.7 million to fund a project in their community. Ironically enough, the City of Brooklyn Center had given part of their allocation to another community earlier this summer and now has discovered a need for the funding. Regarding the City of Eagan's options for committing a portion of the IDB funding for future use beyond September 1, there are specific rules that do apply. The City would be required to submit a letter of intent with a 1% deposit no later than August 31, 1985, to the Department of Energy and Economic Development. The City will receive a full 1% refund by October 31 if there are no requests for funding by that date. Interest is not a reimburs- able amount by the State. If the City decided to continue the 13 deposit with the State after October 31, we would lose 2/3 UL Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen of the deposit on amounts not used by December 20, 1985. In summary, the alternatives are as follows: 1) turn back the entire entitlement to the State of Minnesota to be used in the State-wide pool; 2) Submit a 1% deposit and retain a portion or all of the IDB funding for the City of Eagan for a specified period of time or 3) allocate the remaining IDB funding to the aforementioned cities with the remainder going to the State-wide pool or through a 1% deposit by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt one of the twelve alternatives as presented by the City Administrator. • • 37 • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL A. Conditional Use Permit for the Community Action Council to Allow a Shelter for Battered Women --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider a conditional use permit for the Community Action Council to allow a shelter for battered women. The APC is recommending approval of the condi- tional use permit. For additional information on this item, refer to the Cit Planner's report, a copy is enclosed on pages / through . For a copy of the APC action, refer to those minutes found on page(s)q�_ �Zfip,. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: tional use permit to allow a shelter ted by the Community Action Council. S To approve or deny a condi- for battered women as reques- V1, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL APPLICANT: FRANK BRENNAN LOCATION: SE's OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CEDAR RIDGE IST ADD SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: LB (LIMITED BUSINESS DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • APPLICATION SUBMITTED:. An application has been submitted requesting to relocate the Community Action Council's shelter for battered women. This relocation would be on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Ridge 1st Addition, Section 30. COMMENTS: The Comm. Action Council's shelter has been in existence in Eagan for 6 years.. It is the City's understanding that they would like to increase the size of their facility in order to better serve the residents of Dakota County. In 1984, through the Community Development Block Grant process the Comm. Action Council submitted a request to relocate the shelter and was allocat- ed approx. $225,000.00 from the Cities of Burnsville, Apple valley & Eagan. The City has committed itself to the program for this relocation and funding. At the time the Comm. Dev. Block Grant was submitted, there was not an exact location for reloction. • The applicants have now submitted a new site plan and the specifics on location, design and budget as to where this new facility is proposed to be located. The property is presently zoned LB (limited business) where there is a dental clinic on the south and existing homestead on the north. The only residents are located east along Nicols Rd. The facility appears to be in a location which would not impact a residential area. As stated before, this is a relocation of a facility that has been located in Eagan for 6 years in a residential neighborhood. . However, since the expansion and upgrading will handle more people, it was felt that this location would be suitable for the shelter. The proposed building will contain a gross of 5,485 S.F. This would breakdown as 3,697 for residential living, or for the battered women quarters, and 1,846 for administration and office space for running the program. Therefore, total square footage of 5,400, or basically the size of a small office facility. , Since the time the funding was approved, the Comm. Action Council has put together a detailed budget and square footage cost which has to be approved by the City Council prior to receiving any funds for this project. The applicants will be submitting a budget for the shelter and cost analysis for the council to review and 1/ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2. approve. If the Commission would like detailed information on this facility or costs, the Comm. Action Council staff will go through the numbers and make this info available to you. If approved this facility should be subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted & approved prior to occupancy of the facility. 2. All other City ordinances shall be adhered to. • • 4y / I/ 1 I M I NN. DEPT. OF TR iI w l A SPORTATION :RIGHT OF i AY PLAT; ' N0. 19- 'u !� 7 os `------------------ q0 --••••••.... --- . w ------------ 1 °------- k W NSe: m 3i C 0 ;,; XJ - �----- - - - (CDUNTY STATE' AID HIGHWAY N23I) TIIPP --� ROAD COL 0. i s i. ��; 0 6 6 . C f D C .I a .• �� sett/ tee— a DIAMOND � Y - 7 . - ^�' r[®[• � r" . yPG d_'1, 1 .i3 --•r I - -I• : i G nw M1"y ? r. 'LD� G •°r •/ a j �a"�•,/f�'� O/�b1 ° 'Of ~ s a_.e rn�tiOp`i•E. t'QL � _- -s C/ D' n3 t � � r 771 m Z �l It UTI. AREA . JIL.31 • in - 12.196 JS sq. FT. OR 1.66 ACRE BUILDING COVERAGE - 4.512 $0. FT. OR 62 OF SITE. WALKS. PARKING & DRIVES • 44.012 SQ. FT. OR 629 Of SITE. LANDSCAPING • 22.940.75 SQ. FT. OR 322 Of SITE. PARKING PROVIDED I ES SIA6L • I AAMDICXP • 29 SPACES V. V;E LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (03"locre) R -ll mixed residenllalO&ITUMM) R-111 mixed residenti0161MNlsr14 R -N multiple (•12vIIVocre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial RBD researrhMevelopment COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping tenter RSC regional shopping Center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks, quasi public E.M,15,5chools FEB. 1981 CITY OF EAGAN t. C43 • • s COMMERCIAL •,i •`;:r: i e. •.. '�-:. Ind:. '� •. PLANJED DEVE T �d - -l•^•% , •' .. &' ...� .. RI:. II y Ind •' 1.._ . 1 ir. •t�: �ri._ d li I LU ... RII' ' Intl '" I,I • T - - e - I RN rl, ..' n I I. P•C Ha E Intl •' r, /� •` ..... — , R6D 1 RN r. I RAI _ Ind, Na Fill'.: l� R.11 RAI._ �1 LB Rn Re F ' is I .:... .':.nr. i :7i.'Ef RA 'Tr R11 r.:.. Ind } .. . .' J RIII•;'.,6, LR -1 ' •• R-1 - 1 ' Ina -� ` LI_... -:.,, irUj �I R -I R -Y ;( � R-1 N ' y CSC . `P ""-"•'� I RG'( ��tA:M+'. r -/. tE .. .. - 'RI:,, IO';, ' R -II + a -II R -II M - E '• -� 1 " 1 LB E '�G', •/ M' II. II) RAII RB RIII ;; 'iL[� X11! ;... � i R.t :_.. .. RIIIR-al 9iiRi�CSCIGB RA ...RI "f .) RAI. A -Il RII •TP, .H':�..:,:•.' ); .. { ry •.. �� 1 • ^�I r l7J 'n�: _RI •.qL , '. IRI �\71' �� ,nI R-1 �' -�i CSC Iv LB III LB • R. \� yq LB / -• D LB r '. .. R, I, P 1 e I l��l ,1 �-p�V� i- \.• ul l� dV1 �. R -I R-1 Pi I) R -II .!i;1� .. ._' RA R'll - 11 R41 0� 1. 'HOr.EMOUNT CPPLE J vPLLEY LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (03"locre) R -ll mixed residenllalO&ITUMM) R-111 mixed residenti0161MNlsr14 R -N multiple (•12vIIVocre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial RBD researrhMevelopment COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping tenter RSC regional shopping Center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks, quasi public E.M,15,5chools FEB. 1981 CITY OF EAGAN APC Minutes July 23, 1985 1. A detailed landscape plan including screening or buffering shall be submitted when the detailed site plan of'the church has been submitted for review and shall be approved by City staff prior to final plat approval. 2. The plat shall be reviewed and approved by the Eagan Park Commission in regard to access to the City park, prior to final plat approval. 3. The developer shall meet all standard plat conditions for this development. 4. A 60 -foot right-of-way shall be dedicatgd for public streets. 5. This development shall petition the City for the installation of the necessary trunk storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -29. Also, the overflow outlet to Pond AP -11 must also be under construction prior to final plat approval. • 6. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area watermain and trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in affect at the time of final platting. 7. Because this development lies within two different water pressure zones, there shall be no connections between these pressure zones. B. With the exception of trunk storm sewer outlet construction, all costs for all other street and utility constructions shall be the sole responsibility of this aevelopmenc. Hall noted that the developer would have to pay for the installation of Rahn Roaa adjacent to the development or split the cost with the owner of the property to the east. Voting in favor of the motion were McCrea, Wold, Trygg and Hall; voting against the motion were Wilkins and Harrison. The motion • passed. Wilkins stated that she voted against the motion because the developer does not have a firm commitment from the church to build on the property and because of her concern about the effect on the duplex lot on the south, if the property goes completely commercial on the north. Harrison stated that he voted no because there is no firm commitment from the church to build on the property. COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - WOMEN'S SHELTER Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Community Action Council for conditional use permit to allow a shelter for battered women on the south half of Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Ridge lat Addition in the northwest quarter of Section 30. Dale Runkle explained the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. Mary Ajax appeared for Lewis House, the battered women's shelter and explained that the shelter has been located in Eagan since 1979 and is now planning to relocate to a larger building. The architect, Robert Burroughs, described the application and mentioned that there would be a tot lot play area, as well as a hard top play area, that the parking area would be looped with two access points off Nicols Road, that there will be approximately 5% building coverage, and 50% to 55Z y/7f t. a;�'a`• ;: tib' Y /$ APC Minutes July 23, 1985 green space. In response to questions from the public, Chairman Hall stated that the application was for a permanent building. Mary Ajax explained that the funding will be provided partly from a block grant, partly from a private foundation, and partly from the proceeds of sale of the current shelter, and that operating expenses are provided by the.State of Minnesota, Dakota County, the United Way, dna foundations. She stated that most of the women using the shelter are from Dakota County, and that a total of 30 women and children could occupy the new building. In response to questions from members of the commission, Dale Runkle stated that based upon the past history of the facility, the parking should be adequate, and if more is necessary, he is sere the shelter would add them. Mary Ajax stated that the current shelter has 8 parking spaces which are not adequate, that currently 15 people can stay at the shelter and there are up to 10 staff people at the facility at any given time. Burroughs stated that if necessary, additional parking could be added to the rear of the building. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • application of Community Action Council for a conditional use permit to allow a shelter for battered women on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed lanascape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff prior to occupancy of the facility. 2. All other city ordinances shall be adhered to. All voted in favor. FLOUR BIN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Rey Anderson, Jr. and Flour Bin In ernat. 1 for a condr}t�i5na1 use permit to • allow a pylon sign located n Lot 1, Block 1, F 'r Bin Addition, in the northeast quarter of Section 31. Dale Runkle exp ed the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. stated that the sign would be located as far to the west a possible nd that if an additional sign is installed at'Ehe east end of the dditio it would be very close to the 300 foot distance required by City ode. The applicant, Rey Anderson, Jr., appeared and stated that survey ow that there would be 300 feet from the proposed sign to the location of aand he stated that hexuossible sign on the east part of the addition, ld guarantee that there is sufficient room for the installation of a 4kgn on the east side of the addition. There were no comments from the publv McCrea moved, Harp6son seconded \the motion to recommend approval of the application of Ray �tnderson, Jr. andr Bin International for a conditional use permit for /pylon sign to bated at the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The square footage of the sshall not exceed the footage shown on Exhibit "A" of just over 80 square fee]({t/` of sign area. ....... Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/FLOUR BIN ADDITION - B. Conditional Use Permit for Flour Bin Addition for a Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign by the Flour Bin International Restaurant Corportion. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. The applicant assured the Planning Commission that 300 feet of spacing is available between the sign under consider- ation and a proposed sign for the future. For additional informa- tion on this item, refer to the ty Planner's report, a copy • is enclosed on pages through. For action that was taken by the Advisory -Planning Commission, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)�.5. is ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit to allow a pylon sign for Flour Bin Addition. �117 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN FLOUR BIN INTERNATIONAL APPLICANT: REY ANDERSON, JR., FLOUR BIN INT'L LOCATION: LOT 1, BLK 1, NEe of SECTION 31 EXISTING ZONING: N.B. (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DISTRICT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign for Flour Bin International Restaurant located on Lot 1, Blk 1, Flour Bin Int'l First Addition, NE; of Sec 31. COMMENTS: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon sign. . The sign is proposed to contain just over 80 S.F. of signage and would be no more than 24' above ground level. The proposed sign meets the criteria for pylon signs in accordance with the City Code for height and square footage. The major concern is the location of the sign for Flour Bin and as to the proposed location of a sign for the second lot. The applicants have taken into account the City of Eagan's ordinance regarding distance between the pylon signs. The second pylon sign will be based upon being able to meet the 300' distance from this proposed sign in the future. • If the Conditional Use Permit is approved it should be subject to the following conditions: 1. The square footage of the sign shall not exceed the footage shown on Exhibit A just over 80 S.F. of sign area. 2. Only the pylon sign for Flour Bin is approved with this Condi- tional Use Permit. 3. All other setback requirements and ordinances shall be adhered to. '5O Z.v �N RC1/Di! �e ask /�} fes" �✓ I �� LL W ' I I I I cu II I E z is. i i i i hvcx¢a SECTION, rli 9 i -! _•.. '. i 1. 11 .rl •ie'el^ :swl I :e. i I I it wYt.O`R ' I II I - I I I IS .. 1 •. IlOM 11°•MNnW10 MCII H .I I I a I I FLOUR OIR 6y� lei I,I I I .m.'~ Qg�N� Jill is! I•_ rll H.mr.s rye —w• I �. Id R•J _ • 1/ 1 flTW IwL�wN1 , ----------------------------------- NICOL/ ROAD I _' ( COUNTY ROAD !° ------_--------------- :x.1 n / .srn N.u..1r_wr I I r I .� 1 %-�• ULVIMQ • I II; .. ! I o =%j r.o ,- IF IN, 155 FILE w � I wn�ulrw��wNnwa wnNwf rL I . B s •. ,COMMERCIAL PLM•PIED DEVELOPAENT ,n .r !., r •I�r..., . RI'.' S I nd Intl -i LE FL R a II P t 1 Ind ,... , 11 - 41 w ,•„// ! H l 1{n �/ d I DB 0117 RN . P'•' R4'.; RR&D R -III 'r it I N 1 � I P .... I" M t i I Ind F NO LR RII RI ,; -Il R -III L© DI� CSC. •d/ Ind R -II R4P C�i7LF RII u IBI ! ' r .RII RII P In > R'1 ERif R4 � I RI r i - 'R lV " • �' a ® I i R11 �.. Rz R .� 11 R 1 \'/,1' I!s�li`�) `�-�-• ' - . R -II E .T� R.1 _�'.P : .I/ r.., '. �. . '.� •. R -I: y !) ,-. R -L -11 M NB RB RIII FI1 R -III R' Rif ai 1 I RI I`, RDI CSClGBI 1!- I /1 P P Rn. a E R.II iA y'i:`:a �: -.t .'.:: J`, ® .II :.,.✓�...{I _. _ R -II r. R -II NO .RI. RI P RIIT'r�i'(-',n i41�1 LI y •R 1`ir W LB ' R -I P '.tl /J ,i�p�l.___, P R'I R -I R -II P R-11 ,Pit RJ RII Tl R-11 !q v P I I 3`• 'iR-II LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (OJualapre) R-11 mixed residenllalOf"d1ocre) R -III mixed residential 612us1lucre) R- IV multiple (•12uuUacnd INDUSTRIAL Intl. Industrial R&D researth8deVelOprnent COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB Mighborhood business GB general business CSC Community shopping cMImM RSC regional shopping coer RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks.Wasl public E,M,NS.schools FEB. 198 CITY OF EAGAN I AMIE VALLEYIL % 1 •.. lr. ) (� rr A �. J', � s'a �'� .� ::i•�1,:�._ :j'r. �rArxi,�.i4:ga- -•�i :- APC Minutes July 23, 1985 green space. In response to questions from the public, Chairman Hall stated that the application was for -a permanent building. Mary Ajax explained that the funding will be provided partly from a block grant, partly from a private foundation, and partly from the proceeds of sale of the current shelter, and that operating expenses are provided by the•State of Minnesota, Dakota County, the United Way, and foundations. She stated that most of the women using the shelter are from Dakota County, and that a total of 30 women .and children could occupy the new building. In response to questions from members of the commission, Dale Runkle stated that based upon the past history of the facility, the parking should be adequate, and if more is necessary, he is sµre the shelter would add them. Mary Ajax stated that the current shelter has 8 parking spaces which are not ---- adequate, that currently 15 people can stay at the shelter and there are up to 10 staff people at the facility at any given time. Burroughs stated that if necessary, additional parking could be added to the rear of the building. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • application of Community Action Council for a conditional use permit to allow a shelter for battered women on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and approved by City staff prior to occupancy of the facility. 2. All other city ordinances shall be adhered to. All voted in favor. FLOUR BIN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Rey Anderson, Jr. and Flour Bin International for a conditional use permit to • allow a pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Flour Bin Addition, in the northeast quarter of Section 31. Dale Runkle explained the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. He stated that the sign would be located as far to the west as possible, and that if an additional sign is installed at"Ehe east end of the addition, it would be very close to the 300 foot distance required by City Code. The applicant, Rey Anderson, Jr., appeared and stated that surveys show that there would be 300 feet from the proposed sign to the location of a possible sign on the east part of the addition, and he stated that he would guarantee that there is sufficient room for the installation of a sign on the east side of the addition. There were no comments from the public. McCrea moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of Ray Anderson, Jr. and Flour Bin International for a conditional use permit for pylon sign to be located at the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The square footage of the sign shall not exceed the footage shown on Exhibit "A" of just over 80 square feet of sign area. - . _ t N]a:f_ryn:j4'i 3 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 2. Only the pylon sign for Flour Bin is approved with this conditional use permit. 3. All other setback requirements and ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. Ray Anderson, Jr. shall personally guarantee that there is 300 feet between the sign and the possible sign to the east in the same plat. All members voted in favor. RAX RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public heari on the application of Rax Restaurant for a co nditi al use permit to relocate a pylon sign in Lot 2 • Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addit o 19. Dale Runkle introduces h July 18, 1985. He stated the property owners which all closer to the new boundary li no comments from the public. Runkle stated that no pr neighboring signs, but that he commission expressed their con 200 feet wide which could re sign. McCrea moved, Harrison the August 27, 1985 meeting to the Perkins sign, and to f does. All members voted in fa • 114.103A n in part of t northeast quarter of Section e applicatio and reviewed the staff report of hat Outlot A ad been vacated and turned back to wed them to move the pylon sign to the west, e. The aQ licant was not present and there were In re��??onse to questions from the commission, lem u{as anticipated with distance between ould //not say for sure. Members of the c n at according to the sketch, the lots are su t in the sign being too close to an adjoining se naed the motion to continue the hearing to a ow the staff to investigate the Location of i d out where Perkins might move its sign, if it - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convenethe public hearing on the application of Roy Spande for preliminary plat ap If yroval of parade 7th Addition containing 4 single family lots on 3.4 acr'in part of Government Lot 7 in part of the southwest quarter of Section 4.ale Runkle i troduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July , 1985. The plicant appeared and stated that his son was also present, th t the intention s for his son to occupy Lots 1 and 2, and for Lots 3 and to be sold, tha Lot 2 might be sold in the future, but he had no co/ncern easemen a, but he did have questions concerning the assessments. hairman Hall noted that assessment questions would be addressed by the ssessment Committee nd the City Council, rather than the Planning Commi sion. There were que tions from the public concerning storm drainage in th area and it was mention e that Mr. Post had installed a- drain file in thea a. Rich Hefti stated t at he was unaware of the drain tile, but that i could be provided that 6be developer would be responsible for keeping the brain tile in place, or providing an alternative tile if it is disturbed. !He mentioned that there iso a 24 -inch culvert which had been installed by the City, which will be included in an easement to be provided by the developer, and that ultimately,'it will be replaced with a concrete storm sewer which will go all the way down to Highway #13.. The applicant stated .,. . ............:r.:.._.. ..>�f'q'..;:r-.fir., 4 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two PRELIMINARY PLAT/SPANDE 7TH ADDITION C. Preliminary Plat for Spande 7th Addition Containing 4 Single - Family Lots on 3.4 Acres --An application was presented by Roy Spande requesting a preliminary plat approval of Spande 7th Addi- tion which would consist of approximately 3.4 acres and contain four single-family lots. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval to the City Council. For additional informa- tion on "this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Depart- ments' report found on pages,3-g' through 6(, For a copy of the action that was taken by the Advisory P nning Commission, refer to those minutes found on page(s) • The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Spande 7th Addition and made a recommendation that this preliminary plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Spande 7th Addition. • _57 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPANDE 7TH ADDITION APPLICANT: ROY SPANDE LOCATION: PART OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7, SWs OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING Depts • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting Preliminary Plat approval for the Spande 7th Addition which would consist of approx. 3.4 acres and contain 4 single family lots in the part of the SW;, Section 4, lying south of Highview Av. & east of T.H. #13. COMMENTS: Presently there exists an old.farm house which contains approx. 3.4 acres. The applicant has indicated he would like to rehabilitate the existing structure and break off between 2 and 3 additional lots in order to help his son offset some of the costs of this development proposal. The existing farm structure would be rehabilitated and owned by the son of the applicant and potentially lots 3 & 4 would be sold off to pay for this development. In review of this proposal, Highview Av is blacktopped with bitu- minous curb, also Bridgeview Terrace is surfaced but onlywith bituminous curb. The streets have a surface width that are not upgraded to the standards for a new subdivision. The one issue that was brought out at the Staff meeting is how much should be required of this subdivision to upgrade the streets to the present City standards. In review of this plat, the four (4) lots on the 3.4 acres are of substantial size and meet or exceed the adjacent lots in the surrounding area. This plat should compliment the lot sizes which border on Highveiw Av and the eastside of Bridgeview Terrace. It appears that there are existing homes in the area and also some infiltration of new construction on these larger lots. Therefore, the remodeling of the existing farm and the creation of the two new lots should not distract from the general aesthetics of the neighborhood. It appears that the Engineering Dept. has more concerns as to which area should be serviced with sanitary sewer and what streets should be upgraded with the approval of the subdivision. PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPANDE 7TH ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: Even though .the existing topography is quite rugged, this site requires very little grading because of,develop- ment into four large single family lots. Drainage over this site is westerly. Two large ravines meet near Highway 13 and characterize the drainage pattern for this site. The northerly ravine (paralleling the existing driveway) conveys storm water from a temporary 24 inch CMB culvert. This culvert collects storm water from Bridgeview Terrace. This development will not require the construction of any additional storm sewer facilities at this time. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer exists within Bridgeview Terrace • and also within Highview Avenue. This line consists of a 9" vitrified clay pipe (VCP). The sanitary sewer located within Bridgeview Terrace will serve the following basement elevations: Lot 2 785 Lot 3 785 Lot 4 787 The sanitary sewer in, Highview Avenue is deep enough to easily service Lot 1. The Staff recommends the installation of the sanitary sewer services to each lot as a condition of final plat approval for this develop- ment. WATERMAIN: An 8" diameter water line located within Bridgeview Terrace will be able to provide service to this development. • Staff also recommends installation of the water services along with the sanitary sewer services to each lot proposed within this development. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Currently the right-of-way for Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue consists of Highway Easement Document 290235. Staff recommends that this development dedicate a 30' half right-of-way for both Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue on the final plat rather then maintain the street right-of-way as a highway easement. Staff recommends dedication of a drainage and utility easement along the southerly boundary of the proposed development to provide for a proposed trunk storm sewer line servicing the Highview Park and Highview Acres area. Figure 1 depicts the portion of . the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan that applies to this proposed development. Staff recommends a minimum width of 30' for this easement. Staff does not anticipate any further additional S9 PRELIMINARY PLAT - SPANDE 7TH ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 easements other than the easements required by code. STREETS: Existing streets bordering this development consist of Bridgeview Terrace on the east and Highview Avenue on the north. Classification of these streets are residential, however, the construction of these streets is not in conformance with City requirements for residential streets. Specifically, these streets do not have concrete curb and gutter and it is questionable whether they were built to the adequate street section for resi- dential streets. Also, these streets are quite old and will need reconstruction in the near future. Therefore, in accordance with City policy, the cost for concrete curb and gutter installation and street overlay are to be assessed to benefitted property. • Staff recommends prepayment of these street assessments in order to reduce possible future assessment administration and possible future disagreements. The assessment portion of this report will cover this item as to estimated cost of the street assessments. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the assessment records, Staff found that the only outstanding assessment, not levied was for trunk area storm sewer. Therefore, this development will be responsible for the trunk area storm sewer assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. Using 1985 rates, this amounts to $6,690.00 (139,382 sq. ft. x $0.048/sq. ft.). In addition Staff recommends this development prepay its future street reconstruction assessment. Staff estimates this to be $16.50/front ft. Staff estimates the assessable front footage to be 870. This amounts to an estimated street reconstruction • assessment of $14,355.00. Both the above assessments can be paid at the time of final platting or spread over 15 years at an assessment rate determined by the latest bond. sale. ME CONDITIONS: Spande 7th Addition 1. People purchasing lots 2, 3 & 4 should be made aware of air traffic noise and that proper insulation should be required in the construction of the new dwellings. 2. The plat should be subject to the Park Commission's review and comment for park dedication. 3. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 4. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be construct into each lot. 5 M 7. L A 30' half right-of-way shall be dedicated on the final plat for both Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Ave. A 30' drainage utility easement along the southerly boundary • of the proposed development shall be dedicated to provide for a future trunk storm sewer line. This development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer and street reconstruction assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. All applicable standard engineering conditions should be adhered to. • � I i ZT o J o�0 5 — 301.99 Rar 3CI 5 MFS. N 89°59 50"E Z. r IV a ` ri -c T I y v h.r /) LU /996o r 5F IQ j �Im ,'oro -- < - h 214. Z5 N 6`1°45 52" W / oP ;f XICORT',k LJWC °� PCX5T AOL)IT1ON AO. TWO (YeC MJNUMFNTAT�°N) s � / / / ►ol al . t� GB -j .r \_•. �.11 , lid RA o..."I [E { 11 s „ y.. i COMMERCIAL •C'". PLANNEDCEVELOPMCNY � Ind ....... _. LD '.' Intl '. � .• 711 ' GEI T : :.,p •' . - 11' �... II I' 1174 ..: PN 1 •I.) _ na �I-.l� .i' P.r. • r y RgD� RN RR .R i I P ._. ❑ 'i Ind. 1 i Intl - NB. LB Rg - "°I R -III L La CSC. .,..I R'll .l.I r, Ra R�II • � .. Iy •.f• Ind 1 RIII f^`.'.':y::: ✓�I :1 (,. _ :•l ,RII -ii It 11 P s, ] .: ,,.RI '1 RI. E P R -I io ® `•R -N Rill 1•-` ! tl. RI r 1\• - RIII .� �w .. [Try .:�. -•i(; �" I L R�0 RI R -II 'i R.1 I N RG •. R11I L "•` _—_ .. JRt�:..P,� •'R'I".- 1r'r[x R -II R -II A, RII RII s V M 1 L LB [i E, _ ( \ 0 .bq'Ji R-1 RIII RB RIII ,. hR': •l it .li:• F.1 :-. I ,.� IIIIIII t R.IP RIII 1;. I " R[I CSCIGB/ / '/hj+ � R -II \ �n R -III' I''ci.. �' •�Si111L1 P i �r-py� E-'��.`._r': `.' P YJ l t CSC I! E R -II a p'11 NB l Ci: ..t•� R-I.i). '.(y.:- : IRI 'I'' P i LB R -III LB /^I R'I CSC , . 1, • i `' - '' •R. 1` LB D LB„R_I P !LCI ;°I I, �, R -I '1 j�..r�, l-__ �\•'\j C1 6P . p -I f WL R -II Pi lr . R -Illi Y"•rs N' /�__ riJ R'11 : I .t �. p-li"I� P -- L f R-11 r,:'” Li •°_..�_ P ['jw.. -„a. e"r 1P - � � �� ...--- --- �1• , lel, ,, , i — Pn'IF vGLLCY LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (07u t/ocre) R -II mixed residenUaIUBIMIocre) R -III mixed residential f5Rlnd/acrd R- IV multiple (•RinNacre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial R&D reseercn&de lopment COMMERCIAL LB limned business NB neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks, Quasi public E.M,I-G.schools FEB. 198, CITY OF EAGAN '_AGAND,ALEI -- 4'1—OST SPUR 747T- - , COUNTRY _ . Cure RB !I PARK -' LB v c5; No 3 A Ii RD 1 \'N;L�� "4 L L cY Hier '✓1c''.`! y' ,PARK - / -LATEA --- - — \N C. �P ic. `x -- - — - iPK:/ �Pbcr — _ --- - --- HQML, X1..,.4 Lli TRE.._� LE Ac,��- 1. 1 33USD_ ZEHNDER AGf�f –= ;4t:iq;,Tg-AN% A 1 ;OME�f� NQS Fil 0' = R 4 I � PARK % coA +qy PF -- -- 'PF I 1 Cb -4 (COACHMAN I c Ks R-3 R-3 ACHMAN7L7__ 1 IGH LAND RD— R-4 ADDITION - 3 _�Yol FOX P 'K GBI�' RIDGE N B _� rs 73 0 G 7 l�11 -URREY Gg RB '� I - I rd ;1117O F. !Ic 01 *I :P-9 98,0 02.0 3 SPANDE -1 TM ADD 1T10N SUBJECT PARCEL m— FIG. #1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate #: RPUBLIC $WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN APC Minutes July 23, 1985 2. Only the pylon sign for Flour Bin is approved with this conditional use permit. 3. All other setback requirements and ordinances shall be adhered to. 4. Ray Anderson, Jr. shall personally guarantee that there is 300 feet between the sign and the possible sign to the east in the same plat. All members voted in favor. RAX RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN Chairman Hall convened the public hearin on the application of Rax Restaurant for a condi al use <rA ermit to relocate a pylon sign in Lot 2, Block 1, Cedarvale 2nd Addi on of a northeast quarter of Section • 19. Dale Runkle introduced t eat' n and reviewed the staff report of July 18, 1985. He stated tt A had been vacated and turned back to the property owners which alloweto move the pylon sign to the west, closer to the new boundary line.pplicant was not present and there were no comments from the public. ponse to questions from the commission, Runkle stated that no pros anticipated with distance between neighboring signs, butthat h ct say for sure. Members of the commission expressed their nceccording to the sketch, the lots are 200 feet wide which cou resuhe sign being too close to an adjoining sign. McCrea moved, Har{son sethe otion to continue the hearing to the August 27, 1985 meeting to allow the sf-aff to investigate the Location of the Perkins sign, 'and to find out where Jerkins might move its sign, if it does. All members voted in favor. SPANDE 7TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT • Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Roy Spande for preliminary plat approval of Spande 7th Addition containing 4 single family lots on 3.4 acres in part of Government Lot 7 in part of the southwest quarter of Section 4. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. The applicant appeared and stated that his son was also present, that the intention is for his son to occupy Lots 1 and 2, and for Lots 3 and 4 to be sold, that Lot 2 might be sold in the future, but he had no concerns concerning easements, but he did have questions concerning the assessments. Chairman Hall noted that assessment questions would be addressed by the Assessment Committee and the City Council, rather than the Planning Commission. There were questions from the public concerning storm drainage in the area and it was mentioned that Mr. Post had installed a• drain tile in the area. Rich Hefti stated that he was unaware of the drain tile, but that it could be provided that the developer would be responsible for keeping the drain tile in place, or providing an alternative tile if it is disturbed. He mentioned that there is a 24 -inch culvert which had been installed by the City, which will be included in an easement to be provided by the developer, and that ultimately,'it will be replaced with a concrete storm sewer which will go all the way down to Highway A13.. The applicant stated 4 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 that there is a ravine down Lot 4, as well as one across Lot 1, and that it is not the intention of the developer to change the ravines or the culvert. It was also mentioned by Rich Hefti that a utility easement will be provided by the developer on the plat, along the south lot line of Block 4. In response to questions from the commission, the applicant stated that the barn on Lot 2 will stay, the chicken coop on Lot 3 will be demolished,, but that the garage will be used. Harrison suggested that according to the map provided, the garage might be too close to the property line. Hefti stated that it appears that the garage does encroach on the 5 foot utility easement along the east lot line of Lot 1, and that it might be best to move the lot line between Lots 1 and 2, 5 feet to the east. ' Harrison moved, Wold seconded the motion to- recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Spande 7th Addition, containing 4 single family lots on 3.4 acres on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: • 1. Buyers purchasing Lots 2, 3, and 4 shall be made aware by the developer of air traffic noise, and the developer shall provide proper insulation in the construction of new dwellings. 2. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review and comment for park dedication. 3. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 4. Sanitary sewer and water services shall be constructed into each lot. 5. A 30 -foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated on the final plat for both Bridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue. 6. A 30 -foot drainage utility easement along the southerly boundary of . the proposed development shall be dedicated to provide for future trunk storm sewer line. 7. This development shall be responsible for trunk area storm sewer and street reconstruction assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. All applicable standard engineering conditions shall be adhered to. 9. The west lot line of Lot 2 shall be moved 5 feet to the east to keep the garage in compliance with City Code. All members voted in favor. 5 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER D. Rezoning for Wyndham Corporate Center (Trammell Crow Co.) of Approximately 21 Acres to a Planned Development and a Prelim- inary Plat Containing One Lot and One Outlot--A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider an application to rezone approxi- mately 21.43 acres from AG, LB & RB to a commercial planned devel- opment. This development would allow one garden hotel, three office buildings and 10,000 square feet of retail services. A second application was submitted for a preliminary plat approval of the Wyndham Corporate Center 1st Addition with 4.95 acres •and consisting a one lot for a garden hotel facility and one outlot consisting of approximately 16.49 acres for development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval with three additional conditions to the staff report as follows: 1) the parking stalls be ten feet wide. The proof of parking be reviewed in one year to determine adequacy or if more spaces should be required. 2) Eagandale Boulevard shall be a minimum of 36' wide. 3) The sanitary sewer to be placed in capacity and in adequate depth to provide access to property to the south. For additional information on this item, refer to the City Planning and Engineering Departments' report found on pages_ Lthrough �. For a copy of the minutes of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) 5,10 — glg The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Wyndham Corporate Center on August 15th. After review of the preliminary plat, the Commission recommended ,• that this be subject to the City's cash dedication requirements for commercial property consistent with its policy. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny, first the rezoning and secondly, the preliminary plat as presented. IN N CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT-WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER APPLICANT: TRAMMEL CROW COMPANY LOCATION: PART OF SEa OF NEa OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: AG (agricultural), LB (limited business) and RB (roadside business) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 16, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The first application submitted is a request to rezone approximately 21.43 acres from AG (agricultural), LB (limited business) and RB (roadside business) to a commercial planned development. This development would allow one garden hotel, three office buildings and 10,000 sq. ft. of retail services located in part of the SE; of the NE; of Section 4. The second application submitted is a request for preliminary plat approval of the Wyndham Corporate Center 1st Addition with 4.95 acres and consists of one lot for garden hotel facility and one outlot consisting of approximately 16.49 acres for develop- ment. COMMENTS: The development plan, Eagan Woods, which was the property Trammel Crow had purchased first, is the parcel directly north of the parcel for consideration. The P.D. now submitted would contain a total of 21.43 acres and is just south of the property • they had previously purchased. The P.D. Eagan Woods,to the north, consisted of two office buildings and a hotel is now being considered for development as an all office complex or three office buildings vs. the hotel. Therefore, Eagan Woods P.D. would now consist of a single use of office on the property to the north. The Wyndham Corporate Center, the P.D. now under consideration, is the old MPCA property which Trammel Crow has purchased and added to their land holdings in this general area. In review of this P.D. is the location where they have chosen to locate the hotel complex instead of the property to the north. The planned development submitted would consist of 21.43 acres and contain one hotel, three office buildings, which would range from 41, 000 sq. ft. to 66, 500 sq. ft., and a one story 10,000 sq. ft. retail facility to provide support facilities to this office and hotel complex. The total land development would consist of one hotel, two three-story office buildings, one two-story office building, and one one-story retail building for a total of 5 buildings in this planned development. 70 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 The first phase of the development is proposed to be the two story garden hotel. The facility is proposed to consist of 134 guest rooms, 2300 sq. ft. of meeting space and a 98 seat restaurant and lounge facility. The parking spaces required for this restaurant/hotel facility would be 200. The applicants are proposing to provide 158 spaces noting that they feel there is an overlap between the rooms, restaurant, and meeting spaces that their past history for parking spaces is less then what we are requiring. The applicants are proposing to provide an additional 46 spaces in a proof of parking plan for a total of 204 parking spaces which could be provided if required by the City. Access to this P.D. would be from the major access at Eagan Industrial Boulevard, Eagan Woods Drive, and Pilot Knob Road* The same access which is serving Eagan Woods, the development to the north, is also the same road access which is serving Wyndham Corporate Center. The access and traffic circulation is the same as what was originally proposed to the north and now the concept of continuing the loop street system around to the south and back out to the original point of entry. The hotel facility will be located in the central area or the heart of the development plan. The Preliminary Plat submitted would only allow Lot 1, Block 1, Wyndham Corporate Center, to start the preliminary plat process. As stated earlier in this report Lot 1 is the location of the garden hotel which they plan to construct as their first phase. The remaining four buildings will be platted as an outlot and replatted and a detailed site plan submitted with each phase of development. • GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading for Phase 1 (proposed hotel) appears to be in conformance with all City Codes. Where storm water runoff cannot be conveyed directly into nearby storm sewer, the developer proposes on providing temporary ponds for sediment/ erosion control. These- temporary ponds will assist greatly in controlling erosion on the westerly portion of this site where the steepest grades and roughest terrain exists. The installation of storm sewer with the Eagan Woods Boulevard construction will provide an outlet for storm water collected over the eastern half of this proposed development. This storm water eventually discharges to a detention pond constructed with the Eagan Woods Office Park Addition. This 'proposed development will not require the installation of any trunk storm sewer. REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 SANITARY SEWER: This development proposes to extend an 8" sanitary sewer from the "North Interceptor" south along Pilot Knob Road. This proposed layout is not in conformance with the City's Compre- hensive Sewer Plan. As shown on Figure 1, this development was to be included in sanitary sewer subdistrict N -J. By servicing this development as proposed, sanitary sewer subdistrict N -J will decrease in area and sanitary sewer subdistrict N -K will increase in area. However, because the MWCC "North Interceptor" is -the,.-ultimate recipient of waste water from either .sanitary sewer subdistrict, staff does not feel 'the proposed sanitary sewer extension will cause any problems. • Because the location of the sanitary sewer extension is within Dakota County Highway• right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road, this development will need to acquire a permit from the Dakota County Highway Department for utility construction within Dakota County right-of-way. Also, this development will require a permit from the MWCC to connect to its "North Interceptor." Staff does not anticipate any difficulties in obtaining either permit. The developer will be responsible for obtaining both permits as a condition of final plat approval. WATER MAIN: The Eagan Woods Office Park Addition project included extension of an existing 12" water main across Pilot Knob Road from Corporate Center Drive. The location of this water main is within Eagan Woods Boulevard and terminates at Eagan Woods Drive. This water main is of sufficient size and capacity, to provide service to this development. Staff does recommend the southern extension of this water main to the end of the radius • located in the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. The reason for this extension is that staff will be recommending the extension of Eagan Woods Boulevard southerly from the entrance drive to this point. This development will not require any extensions or upgrading of trunk water or sanitary sewer. STREETS: Again, Eagan Woods Office Park Addition project is providing for the construction of Eagan Woods Boulevard. This street will provide access to Lot 1, Block 1. However, staff recommends that Eagan Woods Boulevard be extended southerly from the entrance onto Pilot Knob Road to the end of the radius located at the southeast corner of Lot '1, Block 1. This extension will pick up traffic from the proposed southerly driveway of the motel. This street extension shall be built to City standards, that is a 36 ft. wide curb and gutter street built to 9 -ton loading status. 7v _ REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends the dedication of adequate right-of-way for Eagan Woods Boulevard located in the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. In addition, staff recommends the dedication of a 60 ft. right-of-way for the curve located at the southeast corner of this lot. Staff does not recommend any further easements other than the easements required by code. ASSESSMENTS: Staff researched the assessment records and found that this development is responsible for trunk area water main and storm sewer assessments. The following table summarizes these assessments ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT SUMMARY Est'd 1985 Description Qty. Rates Trunk Area Water Main Lot 1, Block 1 4.95 Ac $3,020/Act Outlot A 13.20 Ac(1)$3,020/Ac) Trunk Area Storm Sewer Lot 1, Block 1 215,622 S.F. $0.072/S.F.�3� Outlot A 574,992 S.F.1 $0.072/S.F. (1)Includes 208 credit for future R/W. • Amount $14,950 $39,860 $15,520 $41,400 (2)Includes $1,830/Ac water availability connection charge for Com/Ind.• (3)Com/Ind. Rate. Assessments for Lot 1, Block 1, are due at the time of final plat- ting at the rates in effect at that taime. Outlot A assessments will be due upon future development at the rates in effect at that time. 73 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: If this planned development is approved it should be subject to the following conditions: 1) A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the overall planned development as submitted with the planning report dated July 16, 1985. This development agreeement shall be for a period of five years unless appropriate extensions have been applied for. 2) An architectural design shall be extablished by the developer and reviewed by City Staff in order that all of the buildings will have a common architectural theme. • 3) Accoustical treatment shall be provided within the building in order to minimize any noise impacts along with the site from planes overhead, I-494, or Pilot Knob Road. 4) A general grading plan and overall landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted and the detailed plans submitted with each phase of development. 5) The P.D. shall be reviewed by the Eagan Parks Commission in regard to park dedication for this development proposal. 6) Standard preliminary plat conditions shall be applied. 7) The detailed landscape plans shall be reviewed and compared with the general theme of the landscaping for the planned development. • 8) The width of the parking spaces shall be determined by the APC. Presently, the applicants are proposing 38 10 -foot wide spaces and 116 nine -foot wide parking spaces. 9) This development will be responsible for obtaining all neces- sary permits for the sanitary sewer extension. 10) The 12" water main for Eagan Woods Boulevard shall be extended southerly from the entrance road through the radius located at the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. 11) A 60' right-of-way shall be dedicated for the southerly extension of Eagan Wood Boulevard. 12) This development shall be responsible for trunk area water main and storm sewer assessments for Lot 1, Block 1, at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 13) All costs associated with public improvements construction for this development shall be their responsibility. 7�_ `4,'�•e l�, r,. 1j MEN DO TA \'\TS North Interceptor \\ . - Z _ N- K,rnl.a I.r,r• r•a •\�. j, --- 7 - r . I I - NSM,. /� q , - 0 qST SP'In N' I 21 x.1211 76/ aLrE� c _�✓/� GUN CLUB yl :. •.r r:n , �•T.••,.•;:;; •_� I �i� � i .:�1�•.ar v I �� - LAKE _ ,• Ir—Ilc[ Ir..3.r •v.Ewj�Z 11 �( /V 2r1 'r. .30�n^ ceu RK 30 5 _ �I IN /I.. ` 77 . j Y�';1� 136'1 i'l i„I �.�"'�r•, �nr.�=.s I `�'/d`� ' �rI'--�_-=+=%y N_. L 1B ZIA> N -A P ..t\ N- F a ` _..rFAQ L _W _ ',• II 'PILO; `.. .. ` J 36 . �..�.. 67 N—B I I �`-..Ar.. L'�—I. USPOSTAL CF q iryns:cD '1 /.I �,..�, x.•.11 n'• ,��: r h"I , — ` N-C�%- i cNFr2=E5D5 - / jLE //PARK J-1 j+Qron r3o L 15114 f A,cncv1 FOX = 30n •/l – �.a PICGE ..1 JL., ;% N —E D L Y" N -V -B WYND14AH CORP. CENTEF2 SUBJECT PARCEL city of SANITARY SEWER an � PUBBLICLIC $ WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN FIG. *2 approved: standard plate q#: WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER PILOT KNOB ROAD AT 1-494 EAGAN, MINNESOTA • TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY/ BLOOMINGTON, MN OWNER • WILSON / JENKINS & ASSOCIATES, INC. ARCHITECTS / PLANNERS • HANSEN, THORP, PELLINEN, OLSON, INC. CIVIL ENGINEERS METROPOLITAN AREA CORPORATE CENTER „VICINITY MAP Iia—353.•.v :i.=:: rgELDA ARV PLAT A REZONNG SIBMRLL FOR WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER uou TINE VICH NAP PU PAGANDAUEI 74-7 PU F't F, I c RY UB -R B LB I T t; ST NO 3 A I R D Ly -q 71 VALLEY HicH PARK ACREJ NO" FFLATCAQ p CL/ KT— R-1 l. -p TREFFLE ACRES i-17iLL Pl�--EY SUBD ZEHNCER ACP 'AinR- 4 IrdG GARDENS i p P, .CRW F. z l 0 FR B 5 ip Ir ..... . _77 -- -------- A o�pp 6., 0 0 0 0 Z:t- 1 b" THMMU CROW CO. 0 0 .. ......... -- --------- �PUT REZOMW�TTa FOR WVWMAU CORPORATE CENTER EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS rLrIl 0 M.Ia 2 OFFICE r �• �_ , HOTEL - I J 0 l� \ 3 FF 3OFFICE 7� (�) Lr f r,r y7 ` �' 1 ry'. w I L1 _- �� 4OFFICE `-- ^i? .i:^ ill"✓ ',! 4 S� �`l�."1.,.[[�� t�_ (411 •..fir � _ YN.M1l. • �. .1 .. +jr..l err\g �.�1. }.FT..�T rvCrik'l.lN1'i'�yl�`\!v �._ —_ __ ley EAGM MUSTRIAL BLVD. Ii1 TRAMMELLCROW CO, TRAMM vn In eoa.enn,e..wu Ry&moIJ��kins -_'aT—•STATISTICS: P1ELMONARY PIAT a Parking Site Area 21.435 acres/933,700 6.1. FOR WYNDHAM 166 Building Type Area No.Storles 269 CONCEPT PLAN 1 xe1.1 algoo / 13j Room � 2 2 Dine0 41,00081 2 ® , y 3 Dint• 4 66,50081 05,00081 3 3 011ie. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT PLAN 5 R.wl 10,0000 1 ��r • reeve a r�ro emea mmn m em w Ii1 TRAMMELLCROW CO, TRAMM vn In eoa.enn,e..wu Ry&moIJ��kins P1ELMONARY PIAT a Parking "QONPO SAL 1061207)• FOR WYNDHAM 166 CORPORATE CENTER 266 — - ,DEVELOPMENT 269 CONCEPT PLAN 36 ewwe� r Elaw mom OFFICE PARE i b �i�i / •�,.,' "�' � Y1'b'Fe.rYF I QQ7h»,\'�\��II�'.� IS r- LB (limited blakress) I ' / RB (roodiga bi6+55)av �` ` � : \ off• Fd° / � � i IL W .._ /. ',':• noxi � �;\ 0�7 � ,,,,r�,f UNDE'f1pED A nN n ELO WALE MJMR N....n p i,,{Pu rim` PREUMMM rMZO� BUBWTT� / FOR WYF HAU CORPORATE CE PREUMWARY PLAT •_!/F IJ__ l/ifr/6/M m y . � .� �.' u• I � �M1� 6.�O�N �. ��L,I I . f . PROPOSED I„ L /• I1111T IL0011 E1EVA110 ..lOM•9�1I /.: °.-cp OF O TRMAIELL oaoW CO V w 'ab �,\ I+; \ (I � \ r - �\` /- .•. ��:�' F111P11A AT � fTNTER .. - PHASE 1 I dm..�. 'p' _5 ti D • m M.Ic 1M..... w I. 'fR�l CNDw CO FON WYNDHAM DNPORA" CLMDI WWF INMMELLCROWC0. • I IJ —7 WO.V... WR. i.[ III1 � .. I � xGOrnV..t•4N. i I: rT ` r I y{IW�D.mk - I I If -- gRllOIARY RAT / REZONg061®fRAE FOR WTMOMAM CORPORATE CENTER - 1EYEr@ Ma.R r.xwR - r - uriurr PLAN UTILITY PLAN ie _ p�l"" xeu� mR m.+wr rr ce.cR.mic. ,LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN I YI I D EADAR 0=3TRULL BLVD. O2 d PLANTING LEGEND P PRESERVATION F FOCAL/FEATURE C CIRCULATION V VISUAL RELIEF/SHADE B BUILDING PERIMETER IIemI I TRAYNEUCROWDD, 000 ormn. s.. un m K'iknnl J.•nkinA FOR WYNDHAM EANDBCAPE CONCEFFPLAN GO Ind Ind.. COMMERCIAL If - p PLAMIEDED pEVEIDvELOPMENY -.Iry.. I r-•;. 'i:. �` •• Intl , •au•(I,I�rr LB R11'. • h �. ' '{ •1' +�` P 7 Ind .• 1 III 'a7 ^ R,1 HRI.-• ' •:� B TTI RIL.]' • I n �' ` ::)' - .:.. ;" �•.: Al c T• .'I• e ^� RN 1 •II,..,.,. InO''II`i til Py' R&D) RN R,III ©'• ' i �•''.`. Ind. �. Q` l ... Intl. - NB_. �.o 'YI . R -III • RJI LB r, II 'willP ' R41. [RI p.l RII / _ .. -' R � / --- •_• .. ... . L�� _ ,. • ti's R -I F i ,�..•. '`: '/ I ..�. t:: ..i .I' :I: is 1 RII ., Intl 11 / ni RIII �T I 0 ,. R -I ..� tR,• E '/R 1 P R I Lo R91 - a �JEV\I '. Intl `.I lC i R-1 R.Y 1 y I R.1 N . SIC R -N •_i.P ..!__; �I RAI w l deli.... '' • 7 1 .RII � I RI . P •)1\JC iil��r��._ ,.R -II R-111 �'-".�` __ "'�.'!!1'Ij p .g -'•RI' J fi R -II ++ E • _� '{, /, n •It r� ES .. L IL3 1 /F• •. ... .... _.. LB �nII{II jj R -0I I I RB RN •' -1 E % !A k'q'll R I P -III R-IY R-111 R'' i .1`!: Il;i R 1%, 7• . R -LI CSCIGBI RO R.� j= . R 1 . . . �i CCCLLU�iggJJIIILUUJIII I1�.11 ('� P E RSI. RII. _ r:ii•p-Y -4, ,� �: •j. "' ..I sL1/•i.. '•'•'I '..., I{� R'1 •0.:�. r,.:. �.. 1' '. 1�� 1..: r` IN13:" �lEf iL'• 'o'P,_I I�. :�I: f-�.:... I�0.1. I'�1 U'1 [:r. , LB R-YI LD 9.1 ,.4, .+. CSC • .., ,1'. • ,j l.•• LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (OJlnflacrd R -II Mixed res.denllal(36uitlacre) R -III mixed residentia162mnlocrd R. IV multiple (•RuWaad INDUSTRIAL Ind. industrial R&D research BdNelopment COMMERCIAL LB limited business NO neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P porks•Ruasl public E•M,NS.schools ' L VLRB-I � R�° LRB -I / RI RIe�":.:;' • - •1 FEB. 1981 P P R•Y I: 4 - / i� P R-11 CITY OF EAGAN .. � J; `":_ .-.. � may, /r'7ia•:L xnuxf •,. 71 IALLEV ::�y:: :7'� .,`r;,i.•• 1, APC Minutes July 23, 1985 WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER - REZONING 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Trammel Crow Company for rezoning from Roadside Business, Limited Business, and Agricultural, to Commercial Planned Development, located in part of the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 4, west of Pilot Knob Road, and for preliminary plat approval of Wyndham Corporate Center to contain a hotel and office building at the same location. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 16, 1985. He stated that it was the intention to tie this property into the property to the north, that the hotel would be built on the Wynaham Corporate Center rather than'property to the north, that a detailed site plan had been provided, that the size of parking stalls was an issue with the developer proposing 9 by 20 foot stalls for most of the plat, and that the developer had agreed to provide a proof of parking exhibit. • Robert Hoffman, attorney for Trammel Crow Company, appeared representing the applicant and stated that the applicant now feels that the subject property is the best place for the hotel, that Trammel Crow Company is still a major partner in the development, that the hotel is the same design as used in other parts of the country, that it is designed to appeal to a higher priced market with people staying several days to a week or more, rather than just a day or two, that a variance from the standard parking requirements is requested to allow 158 parking spaces, rather than 200, that the developer can provide proof of parking for 10 by 20 foot parking stalls if necessary, that the purpose of reducing the amount and size of parking stalls is not to reduce cost, but rather to keep vegetation to a maximum and blacktop to a minimum to improve the aesthetics of the project, that thirty-three 10 by 20 foot stalls are proposed for the restaurant area, four 12 by 20 foot stalls are proposed for handicapped spaces, and the remainder of the stalls would be 9 by 20 feet .for use by people in the rooms and meeting areas, with the understanding that people using the hotel in the meeting areas would not be moving in and out as • quickly as people in the restaurant and lounge area. Members of the public questioned whether the sanitary sewer planned for the area would be sufficient to take care of properties to the south, if necessary, as well. Rich Hefti stated that it would be sufficient. Gary O'Brien of Trammel Crow Company appeared and described the hotel and mentioned that it would be a two-story 134 room hotel, with a projected $55.00 to $60.00 per night rate, with French architectural style, marble in the lobby, custom carpets and furniture and other amenities. There was discussion concerning the zoning of the property, and Chairman Hall noted that the property is currently zoned to allow this development, but that the developer prefers to develop it as a planned development. Dale Runkle stated that most of the hotel lot is zoned Roadside Business and the remainder is zoned Limited Business. Wilkins stated that they would have to come before the Commission again before they start any buildings, and McCrea stated that a review in a year to determine if there is parking overflow would be necessary. Hoffman agreed to a one-year review relating to parking. O'Brien stated that they hoped to break ground by October 1, 1985. Wold stated that he recalled that the Yankee Square Inn was required to have ten foot wide parking stalls because it waas� not a controlled parking lot, that in 6 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 some cases, Less parking spaces had been required if the facility was very large, but even inthosecases, expansion area would be required. Runkle stated that perhaps it could be required that other buildings could not be started until parking for the hotel is upgraded, if it is a problem. Hefti stated that the 36 -foot street entrance to -provide two lanes out and one lane in would be sufficient, even in winter. Runkle stated that there would be a buffer to the south, between this development and the R-1 area further to the south. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of Trammel Crow Company for rezoning from Roadside Business, Limited Business,,and Agricultural, to Commercial Planned Development, located in the property described above, subject to the -following conditions: 1. A planned development agreement shall be entered into for the overall planned development, as submitted with the planning report dated July 16, 1985. This development agreement shall be for a period of 5 years unless • appropriate extensions have been applied for and approved by the City Council. 2. The planned development for the property to the north shall be amended to provide that the space designated for a hotel or office building shall be designated for an office building and the designation for a hotel shall be removed. Voting in favor were Wold, Trygg and McCrea; voting against were Harrison and Wilkins; and abstaining was the chair. The motion passed. Wola moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval of Wyndham Corporate Center to contain a hotel and office building on the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. An architectural design shall be established by the developer and reviewed by City staff in order that all of the buildings will have a common • architectural theme. 2. Accoustical treatment shall not be provided within the building in order to minimize any noise impacts along with the site from planes overhead, I-494, or Pilot Knob Road. 3. A general grading plan and overall landscape plan shall be prepared and submitted and the detailed plans submitted with each phase of the development for review and approval by City staff. 4. The planned development shall be reviewed by the Eagan Parks Commission with regard to park dedication for this development proposal. 5. Standard preliminary plat conditions shall be applicable. 6. The detailed landscape plan shall be reviewed and compared with the general theme of the landscaping for the planned development. 7. All parking spaces shall be 10 feet wide. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for the sanitary sewer extension. APC Minutes July 23, 1985 9. The 12 -inch watermain -for Eagan Woods Boulevard shall be extended southerly from the entrance road through the radius located at the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1. 10. A 60 -foot right-of-way shall be dedicated for the southerly extension of Eagan Woods Boulevard. 11. This development shall be responsible for trunk area watermain and storm sewer assessments for Lot 1, Block 1, at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 12. All costs associated with public improvement construction for this development shall be the responsibility of the development. • 13. No parking shall be allowed on the internal access road of Eagan Woods Boulevard. 14. The entrance road shall be a minimum width of 36 feet. 15. Sanitary sewer shall be adequate to handle the property to the south of the proposed development. 16. A variance shall be allowed from the 200 parking spaces required by code to allow 158 spaces with the condition that parking shall be reviewed by staff within one year and if necessary, additional parking spaces shall be provided by the developer upon staff review. 17. The developer shall provide a proof of parking exhibit to indicate the location of possible additional parking spaces. The developer stated that he was aware of the standard preliminary plat • conditions and again urged that parking on the north, south and west of the hotel be 9 feet in width, rather than 10 feet in width. Wold stated that he would not change his motion, because this is not a controlled parking lot. Voting in favor of the motion were Wold, Trygg and McCrea; voting against were Wilkins and Harrison; and abstaining was the chair. The motion passed. A 15 minute recess was taken at 9:00 p.m. ON 8 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four PRELIMINARY PLAT/WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Wedgwood 2nd Addition Consisting of Approximately 10 Acres and Containing 22 Lots on Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition --A public hearing was held on July 23, 1985, to consider an application requesting preliminary plat approval for Wedgwood 2nd Addition consisting of approximately 10 acres and containing 22 single-family lots located on Outlot C, Wedgwood lst Addition. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending appro- val of the preliminary plat subject to conditions in the staff report and further, that all lots should meet the R1 minimum zoning standards. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Departments' report found on pages - _96 through. For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to • page(s) Q2—/" . The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Wedgwood 2nd Addition. It was noted that this preliminary plat is within the Lexington South PUD which has previously completed its parkland dedication. However, the Commission recommended that this preliminary plat be responsible for a bituminous trailway along Wilderness Run Road through the extent of its plat. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Wedgwood 2nd Addition. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES, INC. (BRADLEY SWENSON - JIM CURRY) LOCATION: OUTLOT C, WEDGWOOD IST ADDITION SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 (MIXED RESIDENTIAL - 3 TO 6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE UNDER LEXINGTON SO. P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 __ DATE OF REPORT: JULY 15,. 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING 8 ENGINEERING DEPTS. ® APPLICATION SUBMITTED: -•An application has been submitted requesting Preliminary Plat approval for._ Wedgwood 2nd Addition consisting of approx. 10 acres and containing 22 single family lots located on Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition, Section 26. COMMENTS: Presently the parcel is zoned R-2 under the Lexington South Planned Development. This would allow development to take place within the range of 3 - 6 dwelling units per acre. The Comp. Guide Plan has also designated this parcel as an R-2, mixed residential, with a density of 3 - 6 Dwelling units/acre. The applicant is proposing to develop at a gross density of 2.2 Dwelling units/acre or a net density of approx. 2.5 - 2.7 units/acre. Therefore, this application is slightly less than the densities allowed in the Comp. Guide and the zoning for the parcel. Outlot C, Wedgwood Addition, is a parcel that is surrounded to the north by an existing highline trail and park and the property directly east and west has been dedicated to the City for park and open space requirements for the Lex. South P.D. The track of land has physical boundaries on all four sides. Besides the physical boundaries, there is much vegetation, two very low de- pressions and sever topography on the site. The applicant is proposing to develop a loop street to provide access to the 22 single family lots. In the preliminary review, it appears that a substantial amount of fill would be required to develop this parcel in accordance with the development plan. All but one of 'the lots meet the 12,000 S.F. plus category and all lots, except two, have a minimum of 85' lot width at the 30' setback. The applicant is proposing to develop a loop street which would make all access internal and only two points of entry onto Wilder- ness Run Rd. The lots appear to be oversized in order to accomodate the topography and vegetation as much as possible. Fill will still be required in order to make this development work. ✓6 PRELIMINARY PLAT - WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2. UTILITIES & DRAINAGE: There is sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer service available to serve this development. The City will require an updated drainage and storm sewer plan with contours at 2' intervals indicating how this property will drain and shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the City for approval. The storm water runoff from this development is proposed to drain to Pond LP -50, which is located just to the east of this proposed development on park property. The storm sewer outlet pipe shall be constructed to 891.5 elevation and constructed to Pond LP -50. CITY TRAIL: The City's Comprehensive Trail System indicates that there is to be a trail constructed along the north side of Wilderness Run Rd. which will be the responsibility of this development. This item will be reviewed by the Park Commission. STREETS: Access to this proposed plat is by Wilderness Run RID which borders the south side of this development. The City will require a plan that indicates that the east entrance of the Hidden Valley Dr entrance onto wilderness Run Rd will line up with the east entrance of Waterford Dr of the Wedgwood First Addition. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The City will require utility and drainage easements ten feet (10') in width adjoining all streets and five feet (5') in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. The City will require utility easements a minimum of twenty (20') in width for all public utilities not constructed within the street right-of- way. This item will be reviewed again when the utility plans for this subdivision have been submitted along with the final plat. EROSION CONTROL & GRADING PLAN: The developer shall submit a,* erosion and sediment control plan to the City for review and approval. the City will require an enviro fence along the easterly property line of this proposed plat between Pond LP -50 and this development. The developer shall submit a grading plan indicating the existing and proposed contours at 2' intervals with drainage arrows indicating how this property will drain. ASSESSMENTS: In reviewing the assessments levied over this proposed development which consists of Outlot C of the Wedgwood 1st Addition, it was found that all trunk related assessments have been levied. All future costs for public improvements shall be the sole responsi- bility of this development. 71 CONDITIONS: Wedgwood 2nd Addition 1, The bubble shall be installed as proposed on the Preliminary Plat. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by City staff. 4. The developer shall construct a bituminous trail in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Trail system and it shall be constructed to City specification as determined by the Park Commission. • 5. The developer shall dedicate the necessary drainage_ and ponding easement for Pond LP -50. The easement shall cover all areas below the 893.6 elevation. Utility & drainage easements shall be dedicated as required by Staff. 6. The City will require that the east entrance of Hidden Valley Dr onto Wilderness Run Rd line up with the east entrance of Waterford Dr of the Wedgwood First Addition. 7. This development will not be granted drive access to any of the lots abutting Wilderness Run Rd. 8. All costs for internal utilities and streets shall be the sold responsibility of this development. 9. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the • Standard Engineering Conditions, 10. The City will require plan profiles of the utilities and streets to be submitted to the City for review and approval. Wscm DCWD ?004r PIIRKLAND N BY•SS'fY` W u JUG Bo Y9 41 wo roo ,S nu Yif z I L o C. K t 3 = 4 s a b a 7 I ='S I e S 10 • n oAoI °f Bs ,f Q HIDDEN VALLEY DRIVE •L °° r Yo id r •. °. 12 3 _ - (� h •::., : n•tT•o�•fY• �e °co PARKLAND A, 161.1, ' � 6 `U N br �2• I I 7 a V.1 Inf/�Dfv og W r:s o RnIESs RUN R , 4. yy Y9 '2 •• r oc %/ RoyD s^ is N)l oyy• r90 0 VICINITY MAP SEC. Z6, ,� =,. r ;[ i . SM PLAN .... ., LEGAL OESCRIPTiOK OUT T C,W10CW000 FIR5T ADDITION j ZONING: PUD- K -C DENSITY: GBUSS 22 UNIT ACRE N I AREA: 10 ACRES •' • " I UNITS: 22 SINGLE FAMILY UNITS so N r SCALE, lo= 100' i I � 1 / i \ 0 0 N Et4*SS'fY' W 22P •In.•r .914 w .q`3 UL 4�" 917' -_�-`'-.• e .�-- -•pal: -- �Aa ' � •� - ' :iH'DD � IYALL'EY�t,D �YE' ; a • ° �:-_' -- 'ao ....-r -- -: _- • _ "8d 9+t- V v4; 'o •. 1` 1• ..1 . a ,; ,, • - ��• �,— � � �� ;',. �'� ,'•.9Ei,r. .. • :.:oW 13 61 A. 761.10 Af IV t 49oY.07 - , •rot--- .4 d"- p'� --`; N)/oYY Z( .180-..•``-. `_'\ VICINITY MSP GRADING PLAN SEC. 24, CE' — — — — EnVING CONTouRS ,1 p�ovosEC `v No SCALE, I"= 100 �•ji` A. 17.O7'fY• ae I e I` F � i a • N �zsy, as i I ly, 4e'H •as S I 4 '• 0 d•I• i it o9•y VICINITY MAP SEC. 26, TM a,, RGE 1 N 89•ss,sY• W 89 B9 wo ' iso 80 u = Q L o c K ,I s . 9 to f .a .�f •A� �� . ., o, ,B as wo 3 •oe _ —f,I _ I _._ IL--G1� vutalnu^c l . . I_ I- 3, o •o Bo Bo Bs •„ 'to ca ro0.h fEwF• ✓.,, g L16 I vy to o z mo oe 5 I I �•ji` A. 17.O7'fY• ae I e I` F � i a • N �zsy, as i I ly, 4e'H •as S I 4 '• 0 d•I• i it o9•y VICINITY MAP SEC. 26, TM a,, RGE 1 x.w nw 490 Y.p� e UTILITY PIAN SANITARY SEWER -1 WATERMAIN —I—,— STORM SEWER 17 - - 0 IL 13 S 0 I yyt�,�wab Ef15711VG Fysgx e.� N w SCALE' I 100 .a �� is r.-•)�,�� — _ '- l� li _ - 1 / d RA 1.•':� ` I• d GB In LAND USE / I r (...:: till[„ CCPM+IERCIAL r n . / f= PLAhP ED DEVE �PNT GUIDE lei a ,1 r /! .j' PLAN - rr• ! Vii.• �I I• Ina ..... _. _ ., RIC.' 3 - I•, ••,. '-Li"U' Ind. ..I,. ... ..� � 11 ' .rod' /'..`• R1a'..:.. GBjP1 r: •A y-'i RN rAa. \Q .I' a i•• %-. •� �, .I P,_ RESIDENTIAL -.' v— 1 1 � I"""•:' Ind.' R-I single family (Odna/xre) ..I MR-11 mixe0 residential (3CwHlacrr) P © ,i,Yi Irid 1 R-01 mixed residential VA2u /acrd R. IV multiple (•2nd/acrd 1 / • qq Ind, „ 1, ND. LB RII ri.,� -ol p.01 11 i R INDUSTRIAL ✓%' .I'- ',c . 4t LB R-11 P •! Ral .. �f CSC. Ra CSF Ind II Ind mtluslnol � I II RII R8D research8aMloPnerit }} '•I Ra ' ? COMMERCIAL r r : • 1• �.t` / RI P Y LB smiled business r .�• _',' •• •rn:: `. i!. I I ! . �..'Rn rf! + I Ind NO neighborhood business I( •JI • _,,�% It•>I•'^..®! •� I V. I K•I .',-.Ji ..� 1• -��. -�� iE + P , fI vRIII • �.RlF-I a GB general business I CSC community shopp ing center � RSC regional snoppmp Center _R III .. -.:�. "'r''yL^ R41 '1 RB roadside business WN Ind �' �.I •RCT R-1 RV :� RI OPEN SPACE P. -/�..•: P porks.0ua5l public �.I E,M.1S,scnools R-II P R1 J RII �/�r R-III R-1I R-II J q LB B E t RB RID Jd. �III�L91 R-I f, R-Ili R91f A- I' ,4,- .�:I i Ru CSCIGBI RII 11-JFR 1 • E P , R✓ ✓. •'� R.p r R-IIyP _ ® ` For RII. R-II :e'lk l>. '��•1 - .':'.',•. g.� i�'•, :P:'Ra `.i // A <.�� -- I I r �. Il�.q 'J . RII .C. ..ill /J t I .. i'• RI R41: '1 .-1 i t' :: P ✓ F. L6 �•..:6 RB LB /. .. / R-I fI(X t - �1�I,I'I R-I G �i — P FEB. 198, R-1 R-1 f P ^� II `e. ^i � RI R-11 � , •. 0 R-11ryry .7 I R-11 Rat . F11 r P Pa'. ;� CITY OF EAGAN (.7 - U'J /�•',Ha'it Naafi t, � - 1 APPLE: VALLE♦ f: • fl /� 1 Blau. EW E DAKOTA COUNTY PA R K Py </ EXCEPT IUPJs A (NOT INCLUDE& IN PARK) V, it ly PARK A iA AG ROSEMOUN o qj A PARWALNUT A KWOOD SCHWAN PAi Ff&GH T. JF OAK POND EW E DAKOTA COUNTY PA R K Py </ EXCEPT IUPJs A (NOT INCLUDE& IN PARK) V, it ly PARK A iA AG ROSEMOUN o qj • it 1 _ 1—lJ-`.` A J-33 _4,J -_ 54 1 �� ` I i -36 r:) r I:..:. i. 4. \f -.L-6Z J-48 �'� �\ .a J-57 I.. i._ 1 �_� 1 I J�46 J-55 I I 1 \ /^7 I J-47 I J- L -7 L/ J-50 J-65 �� J \ ...� J-56/ J-52 \-51 / - L- 26 -.. _ J \N -14 18 =:v city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ' J -4C I __ I J J-431 28 1 L-35 L-40 nRgTZNE aou. 23 w FIG. #1 approved: standard plate C APC Minutes July 23, 1985 WEDGWOOD 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Tri -Lana Properties, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Wedgwood 2nd Addition, consisting of 10 acres and 22 lots at Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition in Section 26. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 15, 1985. Brad Swenson and Jim Curry, representing the developer, indicated that they were available for questions. In response to questions, Swenson stated that the home values would probably be between $80,000.00 and $100,000.00, and that the values would not be higher because there is a high power line to the north and condominiums to the east.' Curry stated that the development would be hidden from the street by the extensive trees. Wold asked which of the lots were under 12,000 square feet, and Runkle mentioned that the only one that he was aware of was Lot 1, Block 2. Swenson stated that they would be willing to adjust that lot to make it 12,000 square feet and all of the lots are 85 feet in width at the 30 foot setback line. He also stated that it would be expected that the maximum grade level on the road • would be 6%. He stated that grading on the lots would be minimized but that he could not know for sure how much would be necessary until work begins and it is determined what the soil is like. Curry stated that the woods at the rear of all of the lots would be retained. McCrea moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application of Tri -Land Properties, Inc, for preliminary plat approval of Wedgwood 2nd Addition, consisting of 10 acres and 22 lots located in Outlot C, Wedgwood 1st Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The street bubble shall be installed as proposed on the preliminary plat. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City staff for review and approval. 4. The developer shall construct a bituminous trail in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Trail system and it shall be constructed to City's specification as determined by the Park Commission. 5. The developer shall dedicate the necessary drainage and ponding easement for Pond LP -50. The easement shall cover all areas below the 893.6 elevation. Utility and drainage easements shall be dedicated as required by staff. 6. The east entrance of Hidden Valley Drive onto Wilderness Run Road shall line up with the east entrance of Waterford Drive of the Wedgwood 1st Addition. 7. This development shall not be granted driveway access to any of the lots abutting Wilderness Run Road. 8. All costs for internal utilities and streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development 9 /9 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 9. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the standard engineering conditions. 10. The developer shall submit plan profiles of the utilities and streets to the City staff for review and approval. 11. All lots shall meet R-1 requirements. 12. The planned development for Lexington South shall be amended to conform with the plat of Wedgwood 2nd addition and the density which is not used in the area of Wedgwood 2nd Addition shall not be shifted' to the remainder of the planned development. All members voted in favor. • LeMAY LAKE HILLS - REZONING 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing concerning the application of Al Kempf for rezoning from A Agricultural to PD Planned Development, for property located in part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, north of Towerview Road and for preliminary plat approv of LeMay Lake Hills consisting of approximately 1 .69 acres containing 8,sof.ngle family lots and 40 apartment units in the am e area. Dale d`nkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff :port dated July 1985. He stated that there have been neighborhood meet ngs with the d eloper but City staff were not aware of the concerns of the ne'ghbors. Gr ollenkamp, the architect, and Al Kempf, the applicant, were present. Mr. Hollenkamp stated that the townhouse units would be two be rooms, a buildings would be two stories, there would be 8 units per buildin , the they would be rental units with the possibility of being converted to c nd iniums at a later time, and that the rental rate would probably be a nd $500.00, but that he is not sure. In • response to questions from the pub c, Mr. Kempf stated that the cost of the townhouses would be about $40.00 square foot or about $40,000.00 per unit, that the vegetation by the la wo d not be disturbed by the developer, that there would be 2 and 112 par ng spa es per unit, one in the garage, one in front of the garage and 4 a ditional spaces for each building. Runkle stated that the parking ;and d would eet City Code. Mr. Kempf stated that the cost of the single famil lots would ange from $25,000.00 to $40,000.00 and that they would be sold individually, that there would be an approximate 120 foot buffer between Towerview Road and the townhouses, and that the street intersecting Towervie Road would do so west of Quarry Road. A neighboring property owner stated that the road at the south part of the plat would hit Quarry Road at the middle of Wachtler's house, that there is concern about traffic in the area, and that it would be preferable to have the road come out closer to Pilot Knob Road. Hall stated that there would be space needed for stacking along Towerview Road, and Hefti stated that 200 feet of stacking would be a minimum requirement. One neighboring property owner stated that the corner of Quarry and Towerview is hard to see around in the winter, and that it would be better to have the intersecting road farther from that intersection. Another neighbor stated a concern about rental units in the development, the lack of any real concept for the single family units, the 10 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five PRELIMINARY PLAT/LEMAY LAKE HILLS F. Preliminary Plat for LeMay Lake Hills Consisting of Approxi- mately 13.69 Acres Containing 8 Single Family Lots and 40 Apartment Units and Rezoning to a Planned Development -- A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider two (2) applications submitted by Al Kempf to consider 1) rezoning of approximately 13.69 acres from Agriculture to Planned Development, and 2) a preliminary plat to' subdivide the area into 8 single family lots and 5 multiple dwelling lots consisting of 40 dwelling units on the 5 lots. Action was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission to recommend approval of this application to the City Council. For additional • information on the item, refer to the Planning Consultant's report found on pages /6y through s For a copy of the minutes on this item, refer to page(s) Enclosed on pages and 17 is a memo and sketch relating to an apparent landlocked parcel that would result from the approval of this preliminary plat. Due to the fact that the result of this research indicates that the landlocked parcel would not be a buildable parcel, it does not create the concerns originally anticipated during the preliminary review. However, the Public Works Director and City Planner will be able to address this item in further detail if necessary. The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the preliminary plat entitled LeMay Lake Hills at its August 15 commission meeting. Commission members were concerned regarding the setback of the • homes from the lake and that adequate erosion control measures be taken during construction. After a further review of the plat, the Commission made the following recommendations: 1. The plat be subject to a cash dedication requirement. 2. A trailway on Towerview Road and the proposed street to Pilot Knob Road be included. N 3. A trailway along Lone Oak Road from the proposed road to Pilot Knob be included. 4. That adequate erosion control measures be taken in construction and grading of this preliminary plat as well as home construc- tion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning to a Planned Development, and 2) a preliminary plat consisting of 8 single family lots and 40 apartment units proposed as LeMay Lake Hills. /0 C� -- CITY OF EAGAN -- SUBJECT: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat APPLICANT: Al Kempf LOCATION: Northeast Quadrant of Towerview Road & Pilot Knob Road EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING DATE 0f REPORT Agricultural July 23, 1985 July 17, 1985 REPORTED BY: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted for a rezoning of an approximate 13.69 acre area from Agricultural to Planned Development. A second application has been submitted for a Preliminary Plat in order to subdivide the area into eight (8) single family lots and five (5) multiple dwelling lots. Each of the multiple dwelling lots would be developed with an "eightplex" for a.total of 40 multiple dwelling units on the five (5) lots. The preliminary plat also provides for a local residential street which would extend from Lone Oak Road on the north to Towerview Road on the south. ZONING AND LAND USE: The proposed rezoning from Agricultural to Planned Develop- ment - is consistent with Eagan's Comprehensive Plan in that this property is designated for Residential R -II development. This would permit three (3) to six (6) units per acre which would be a range of 41 to 82 dwelling units over this 13.69 acre parcel. •The developer is proposing 40 multiple dwelling units and eight (8) single family homes for a total of 48 units. This property would also be subject to the City's Shoreland Management Ordinance #77. It appears that the provisions of this Ordinance are met except for the minimum lot area requirements of 10,000 square feet per unit for waterfront multiple dwellings on "General Development Waters" as provided in Section 77.03 -of the above -referenced Ordi- nance. This matter will have to be reviewed with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources as provided by the Ordinance. CODE COMPLIANCE: It appears that the preliminary plat complies with the minimum require- ments of Eagan City Codes with the exception of the Shoreland Ordinance as referenced above. �DY Planning Report - City of Eagan Subject: Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Applicant: Al Kempf July 17, 1985 Reported by: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant Page 2 SITE PLANNING: The shape of this parcel and proximity to LeMay Lake and surrounding streets pose some development problems. Several development schemes have been sub- mitted for this property over the past several years. This proposal, titled "LeMay's Lake Development", appears to be well-designed. It provides for a public street through the property. It also provides single family homes across the street from those which currently exist on Towerview Road. It also provides a single family home adjacent to the existing home at the intersection of Lone Oak Road and Pilot Knob Road. The remainder of this site would be developed with relatively small (eight unit) dwel- ling units backing upon Le May Lake. Some of the lots along Towerview Road would have double frontages which is not desirable, however, this cannot be avoided if a through street is to be provided. Also, the through street would parallel Pilot Knob Road for approximately 450 feet and would be at an elevation considerably below Pilot Knob Road. As such, a planting screen should be provided in addition to the change in elevation so that traffic along Pilot Knob Road is not confused by the adjacent traffic flow along the internal street. Also, it appears that the proposed parking areas on Lots #6 and #7 of Block #2 would not meet the minimum 20 foot setback requirement of the Eagan Zoning Ordinance. Either this would have to be redesigned or a Variance would have to be obtained from the City. SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: CITY OF EAGAN LEMAY LAKE HILLS, PRELIMINARY PLAT AL KEMPF NW4 OF THE NW; OF SECT. 10, N. OF TOWERVIEW RD. A (AGRICULTURE) TO P.D. (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) JULY 23, 1985 JULY 18, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading as proposed by this developer • is feasible. However, it will require the construction of 600 ft. of retaining wall adjacent Pilot Knob Road. The retaining wall height varies but the northern portion is approximately 13 ft. high. Other aspects of this grading plan include a maximum of an 8% street grade off of Lone Oak Road. (Although this is not shown as such, the. developer did not show a 2% landing area' at Lone Oak Road. Incorporating this results in an 8% grade.) Also, several areas of 3 to 1 slopes are required to incorporate this grading plan. Although none of the above factors are in excess of City Codes, staff felt they are at least worth mentioning. The proposed grading plan will slightly alter the existing drainage pattern over this site. About two-thirds of this site will drain into the public_ street. Proposed catch basins at the street low point over the existing storm sewer outlet line from LeMay • Lake will collect this runoff. The remaing one-third will continue to drain into LeMay Lake. Therefore, it is important that the developer submits a detailed erosion control plan for review by staff so that erosion and sedimentation into LeMay Lake is kept to an absolute minimum. Because the trunk storm sewer outlet from LeMay Lake is in place, in addition to all downstream trunk storm sewer, this development will not require any further extension or upgrading of trunk storm sewer facilities. SANITARY SEWER: This development proposes to extend sanitary sewer from the existing 8" sanitary sewer line located about in the middle of this development. This is feasible because the existing sanitary sewer is of sufficient. depth and capacity to allow these extensions. Staff recommends that - sewer be extended to provide service to the existing house. PRELIMINARY PLAT LEMAY LAKE HILLS JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2 This development will not require any upgrading or installation of new trunk sanitary sewer facilities. WATER MAIN: This development proposes to connect the existing 6" water main within Towerview Road and loop it through to connect to an existing 16" water main within Lone Oak Road. Both existing lines are of sufficient size and capacity to allow this looping. This development will not require any trunk -water main improvements. "- STREETS: Towerview Road, Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road border this development on its south, west and north, respectively. Towerview Road is designated as a City residential street. Pilot Knob Road and Lone Oak Road are designated as major collector streets and under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Although the classification of Towerview Road is as a residential street, it is not up to City standards. As a condition of this proposed development, the upgrading of Towerview Road to City standards should occur. This will require the paving and installa- tion of concrete curb and gutter for on Towerview Road. The proposed public street connecting Towerview Road and Lone Oak Road shall be a residential street built to City standards. Because of the grade differences between Pilot Knob Road and the proposed internal public street, staff does not feel the close proximity of each will pose problems. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and • Towerview Road exist as highway easements. Staff proposesded- ication of right-of-way as follows: Street Pilot Knob Road Lone Oak Road Towerview Road Right -of -Way Width 55 ft. 60 ft. 30 ft. The developer of this area is proposing to dedicate a 50 ft. wide right-of-way for the internal street. Because this internal street is serving only this development, staff agrees with the developer proposal for the 50 ft. dedication. Staff will require easements over the sanitary sewer and water main not located, within public right-of-way. These easements must be a minimum of 30' in width. All other easements required shall be in accordance with City Code. /a5 PRELIMINARY PLAT - LEMAY LAKE HILLS JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 3 ASSESSMENT: Research into the assessment regarding this site indicate this site is still responsible for trunk area watermain and upgrading of trunk area storm sewer from residential to multiple rates. These are summarized in the following table. Est'd 1985 Description Qty Date Amount Trunk Area Watermain 8.64 Ac. (1) $1,190/Ac'. $10,280 Trunk Area Storm 376,670 sq. ft.(1) $0.013/sq. ft. (2) $4,900 Sewer Upgrading • • (1) Net Area (2) Difference between multiple & single family rates ($0.061-0.048) These assessments are due at the time of final platting at the rate in effect at that time. PRELIMINARY PLAT JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: - LEMAY LAKE HILLS 1) The developer will be responsible for constructing the necessary guardrail/handrail between the retaining wall and the bike path along Pilot Knob Road. 2) The sanitary sewer shall be extended northerly to provide service to the existing house. 3) The upgrading of Towerview Rd. shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 4) A 55 ft. half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Rd., a 60' half right-of-way for Lone Oak Rd., and a 30' half right-of-way for Toweverview Rd. shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5) A 30' width utility easement will be required over sanitary • sewer and watermain not located within public right-of-way. 6) This development shall be responsible for trunk area watermain and the upgrading of trunk area storm sewer assessments from single family to muti family at the rates in effect at the time of final plating. 7) All costs associated with this development regarding internal public improvements will be the sole responsibility of this development. 8) Park Dedication requirements shall be satisfied as recommended by the Eagan Park Commission and approved by the City Council. 9) The developer shall submit a detailed landscape plan providing for a solid screen for the approximate 450 foot area where the proposed internal street parallels Pilot Knob Rd. prior to the approval of the final plat. 10) The developer shall provide a name for the proposed internal street. 11) All provisions of Eagan's Shoreland Ordinance #77, including density, shall be met prior to the approval of the final plat. 12) The minimum setback requirements for parking areas shall be met prior to approval of the final plat. 13) The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee prior to the approval of the final plat by the City. 14) A detailed landscape plan for the multiple dwelling area shall be submitted to the City staff and approved prior to' the issuance of any building permits. 0 0 g749lNWcr Eiuxe EMlcxsox ==�__ a. ._.� YICXxECT9. IMC LEMAY'S LAKE BENELOPMENT i EAOAN, MINNESOTA. IIIAI :q 7:,,1' III u .a if q { -• Wluuuu: m. mvn n. CAMAY'S LAKEI MA i APAA'TME' gf VMt9 :Ad ' -v „ Y� I t!FF19a REdUIR b - {Mtl \ fU& PARKIN0 6H614 - {{w V I IIIAI :q 7:,,1' III u .a if q { -• Wluuuu: m. mvn n. CAMAY'S LAKEI 7—U fea RONBUN9A/ NRANN ENIOKBON AOONnE01O, INC. ' -v „ Y� I L�MAii°3 LAKE DEVELOPMENTLAW, MlWk�btAAl 7—U fea 9 0 0 NON0YN0A/ ANANN [RICN90H Y. u L��Ai LAIN HILLS ANCNITCCT®, INE "°`�"'""""' �' """`�'-• PRELIMINARY UTLITIES PLAN (MSUNSIIY ERK ICSEP.INC WG „._.�....w... ARCHCNI ER _ w� A�YO.M�WWi A�W� LEMAY LAK€ HU -5 PRELIMINARY GRAAINQ Pl-AN EAGANI MINNEEGTA 17-V 1 i4 L �17 Nw9m 19�V/ r -e 1 9994 P€ PRIPTIAN S� uM1T•� gnu ... n � I�� I l�) �yniillt•. .•IYT:`Na awu • LEMAY' S LAKE i 1 �� ir.eH I/rr. I � '719919Ii '7 t In\c \ \ ,BLOCK O,I.1I.oN 0 �i a i ir•nl 791r \ � 1 \\\ IRRIOR.R I ilnrn / UdI. 19/F 11 r• PII-RT-f<PiRR -i slit. I'Mix4.q lNffRINO 11APRNY, INC, — —I PRELIMINARY tiY RAT LtMAY RKY Fill-§ y. — ,« — —I 1- A 0 - -.1 1 .. -� I LEMATO t-AKE DMLOPMFNT:, I "EAGAN, -4 -re MINNFSOTA- - - -.1 1 .. -� I LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R-1 single family (OJvvuacre) R -II mixed re5idenlip106wl/mre) R-111 mixed residentia1612indlocre) R -IV multiple (•12nd/acre) INDUSTRIAL Ind industrial R&D researchfidevelopmenl COMMERCIAL LB limited business N8 neighborhood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P porks,quasl public E,M.F6.schools FEB. 198 CITY OF EAGAN A I H !VIEW . ACRES EFFLE ACRE A i 1 SeIFOOL RA PD K�Pa PARK" PF m t R D U ;n4 DIT ON RI�R-J4 P. R-3/, G� R-4 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE LI .0RW-- L V!YN rM ni c R< 4.) �e;�, ; j J sc P / LB s2-2 R-4 CSC I O'LEARY PARK PILOT OB R ---- CRd SR Dc !_ �. a,r F 1S7ATFS�k �(j1SlOC .� RAILS EAGANDAL \ is GB )AFARK APC Minutes July 23, 1985 9. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the standard engineering conditions. 10. The developer shall submit plan profiles of the utilities and streets to the City staff for review and approval. . 11. All lots shall meet R-1 requirements. 12. The planned development for Lexington South shall be amended to conform with the plat of Wedgwood 2nd addition and the density which is not used in the area of Wedgwood 2nd Addition shall not be shifted to the remainder of the planned development. All members voted in favor. • LeMAY LAKE HILLS - REZONING 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing concerning the application of Al Kempf for rezoning from A Agricultural to PD Planned Development, for property located in part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, north of Towerview Road and for preliminary plat approval of LeMay Lake Hills consisting of approximately 13.69 acres containing 8 single family lots and 40 apartment units in the same area. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report dated July 17, 1985. He stated that there have been neighborhood meetings with the developer but City staff were not aware of the concerns of the neighbors. Greg Hollenkamp, the architect, and Al Kempf, the applicant, were present. Mr. Hollenkamp stated that the townhouse units would be two bedrooms, the buildings would be two stories, there would be 8 units per building, that they would be rental units with the possibility of being converted to condominiums at a later time, and that the rental rate would probably be around $500.00, but that he is not sure. In • response to questions from the public, Mr. Kempf stated that the cost of the townhouses would be about $40.00 a square foot or about $40,000.00 per unit, that the vegetation by the lake would not be disturbed by the developer, that there would be 2 and 1/2 parking spaces per unit, one in the garage, one in front of the garage and 4 additional spaces for each building. Runkle stated that the parking provided would meet City Code. Mr. Kempf stated that the " cost of the single family lots would range from $25,000.00 to $40,000.00 and that they would be sold individually, that there would be an approximate 120 foot buffer between Towerview Road and the townhouses, and that the street intersecting Towerview Road would do so west of Quarry Road. A neighboring property owner stated that the road at the south part of the plat would hit Quarry Road at the middle of Wachtler's house, that there is concern about traffic in the area, and that it would be preferable to have the road come out closer to Pilot Knob Road.. Hall stated that there would be apace needed for stacking along Towerview Road, and Hefti stated that 200 feet of stacking would be a minimum requirement. One neighboring property owner stated that the corner of Quarry and Towerview is hard to see around in the winter, and that it would be better to have the intersecting road farther from that intersection. Another neighbor stated a concern about rental units in the development, the lack of any real concept for the single family units, the 10 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 possibility of many years delay before the single family units are sold or developed. Jerry- Rodgers, resident at 1335 Quarry, stated that the development is inconsistent with the neighborhood, the rental units would be cheap, and that the current houses are well kept and have values in the $100,000.00 range. , In response to questions from the commission, Hollenkamp stated that all single family lots meet ordinance requirements, that the single family lots will be sold to persons building houses on the lot, that there have been inquiries from the developers and individuals about lots in the area, and that the developer cannot afford to develop all of the subject property as single family because of the assessments and costs involved, and that each individual apartment unit would have a separate entrance onto a walkway area in the middle of the building. Wilkins raised questions concerning the retaining wall between the street and Pilot Knob Road, and the distance between the retaining wall and the sidewalk. Refti stated that there would be about 10 feet between the retaining wall and the sidewalk along Pilot Knob Road, and • Hollenkamp stated that it would be possible to include a stairway from the street to Pilot Knob Road to keep children from cutting across yards. In response to questions from the commission, Kempf stated that the street in the plat will be a public street, that if the apartments are sold as townhouses, there will be an association and that if they are not sold, the developer will manage the project. Runkle stated that further review of the proposal in relation to the shoreland ordinance would need to be done by the staff, especially as it relates to the density of the proposal, and that staff could also look at making the street line up with Quarry Lane or moving the street to the west. Kempf stated his desire to sell the townhouse units eventually. Wold stated his concern that the proposal appears to be in between being a rental development and development for sale, and that part of the development might be sold and part would remain rental property. Runkle suggested the possibility of requiring that there be an association when a certain percent of the units are sold. Wold suggested that covenants could be required on the single family lots to make them compatible with the neighborhood, especially • as this would relate to the square footage of the homes. Trygg agreed that covenants could be helpful, and Hall stated that this appeared to be the best development plan that had yet been proposed for this property. Wilkins moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend approval of the application 6f Al Kempf to rezone from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) approximately 13.69 acres located in part of the northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10, north of Towerview Road, subject to the condition that all procedures in the Shoreland Ordinance shall be followed concerning the consideration of exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance by consultation with City staff and concerning the submission of the proposed planned development to the Department of Natural Resources for its review and approval, and as part of the same motion, Wilkins moved, Wold seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval.of LeMay Lake Hills, consisting of approximately 13.69 acres containing 8 single family lots and 40 apartment units in the property described above, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall be responsible for constructing the necessary guardrail/handrail between the retaining wall and the bike path along Pilot Knob Road. //I 11 U • APC Minutes July 23, 1985 2. The sanitary sewer shall be extended northerly to provide service to the existing house. 3. The upgrading of Towerview Road shall be approved prior to final plat approval. 4. A 55 foot half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road, a 60 foot half right- of-way for Lone Oak Road, and a 30 foot half right-of-way for Towerview Road shall be dedicated on the final plat. 5. A 30 foot width utility easement shall be granted over sanitary sewer and watermain not located within public right -off -way. 6. This development shall be responsible for trunk area watermain and the upgrading of trunk area storm sewer assessments from single family to multi- family at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 7. All costs associated with this development regarding internal public improvements shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 8. Park dedication requirements shall be satisfied as recommended by the Eagan Park Commission and approved by the City Council. 9. The developer shall submit for staff approval a detailed landscape plan providing for a solid screen for the approximate 450 foot area where the proposed internal street parallels Pilot Knob Road prior to the approval of the final plat, and a landscape bond shall be established by City staff and provided by the developer at time of staff review. 10. The developer shall provide a name for the proposed internal street. 11. All provisions of Eagan's Shoreland Ordinance including density shall be met prior to the approval of the final plat. 12. The minimum setback requirements for parking areas shall be met prior to approval of the final plat. 13. The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee, prior to the approval of the final plat by the City. 14. A detailed landscape plan for the multiple dwelling area shall be submitted to the City staff and approved prior to the issuance of any building permits. 15. The developer shall submit covenants for review and approval by City staff for the lots on Towerview Drive to insure compatibility of use and design with the homes currently existing on Towerview Drive. 16. The developer shall establish a homeowners association for the townhome units for review and approval by City staff prior to the sale of any units to separate owners. Ilk 12 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 17. City staff, the developer and neighbors shall study and discuss the feasibility of moving the road to the east or west at its intersection with Towerview Road and the location of the' road shall be established as recommended by City staff, prior to the approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. McCrea stated that she believes that the Department of Natural Resources should review the density of the proposal before the City approves it. Voting in favor of the motion were Wilkins, Hall and Wold; voting against were Trygg and McCrea; and abstaining was Harrison. The motion passed. SUN CLIFF Chairman Hall convened thebl Robert Carlson for preliminary pl consisting of 13.5 acres and contai i with a total of 48 units in part f quarter of Section 29. Dale Runk the staff report of July 17, 1985 and stated that Patrick Hoffman and stated that there would be no shared of them would be for sale, that there price from approximately $60,000.00 will be sixteen 1 1/2 bedroom units w units with 1,096 square feet, and baths and 1,500 square feet. He st each have 1,064 square feet and there the buildings. - PRELIMINARY PLAT " c hearing regarding the 3ipplication of t approval of Sun CliffThird Addition, g 5 duplex lots and 4 tiple buildings • the northwest quaer and northeast introduced the app cation and reviewed The developer, R ert Carlson, appeared uck Winden were lso present. Carlson hallways in t multiple units, that all will be thrO types of models ranging in to approxyhately $100,000.00, that there h 950 uare feet, sixteen 2 -bedroom xtee 2 -bedroom plus den units with 3 ed at the double bungalow units would o d be good sound proofing in all of Jay Tscherne, a neighboring ow r on the east aide of Blackhawk Road, appeared and stated that he had b n as ured by City staff that there would no further access on Blackhawk Road ear C unty Road 30, that the proposed access • would come out very clo:en t his hom and that traffic would face his house directly. Jim Ashworth, ae'ghboring sident at 4235 Blackhawk Road stated that the proposed access ag Blackhawk Road cuts across the bike path, that there could very well b flooding in he area, as his neighboring property, just to the south, has b n flooded, tha trees around the ponding area could be lost, ana [hat aesth ically, the pr posal looks all right. Rich Hefti stated that he was not at the hearing relating to the assessments and was therefore unaware of omments that might ve been made by City staff relating to the access. He s ted that the access ould need to be 300 feet from the a intersection in ord r to have proper eta king distance from County Road 30. Runkle stated Cha the road could be shi ted somewhat. Ashworth stated that Tom Colbert and Bob Rosene had stated that here would be no more accesses in that area and that all accesses from that. property would come off of Beaver Dam Road. Tscherne stated that it is almost.impossible to cross County Road #30 and Blackhawk, and Refti stated that the County had assured him that a 4 - way stop at that intersection would be permanent until it is signalized, within the next five years. 13 MEMO TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: AUGUST 15, 1985 SUBJECT: LE MAY LAKE HILLS PRELIMINARY PLAT As a result of miscommunication between the Planning and Engineering Departments during the review of this preliminary plat, the Planning Commission was not made aware of the "fact that parcel 011-28 is a landlocked parcel with no relief provided by this proposed development. Attached is a sketch as to how this parcel relates to this proposed development and the Tara Court located north • and east of this landlocked parcel. Also shown is the amount of this parcel that LeMay's Lake incorporates. As you can see, the 75' setback from LeMay's Lake does not leave this parcel with much area to develop, approximately 4,000 S.F. In a related matter regarding this development, I met with several residents along Towerview Rd on Tuesday, August 13, 1985, with respect to the access from this development onto Towerview Rd. I indicated to these people that the Engineering Department feels that two alternatives are feasible. In order of preference, the first being locating the proposed public street intersection near Quarry La. A small offset would exist, however, I do not believe it would cause any problems. The second feasible access point would be between 150' and 200' east of Pilot Knob Rd. This location would be approximately directly across from the west property line of the Lunka Addition. This is not feasible • with the grading plan as submitted by the developer because the street grades would be in excess of 10%. In contrast, the street grade coming up to Towerview Rd, as proposed, is approximately 58. If Council approves of this development layout, then the only feasible access to Towerview Rd is near the Quarry La intersection with Towerview Rd. If I can be of assistance to you regarding any info contained in this memo, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Rich Heft RH:jbd CC: Dale Runkle, City Planner enclosure 5 Z NORTH AL 1'-W JESCRIPT ON . LEMAY'S LAKE MI2 • • �•, �, DRAINAGE EASEMENT - r+ 6].100 SO T. �'I., .•s ,. 111 1 A BLOCK --------------- f i= 2 11 YPtl ifL •• \ Ij I 0 6.1900 MIT 1118 I 54500 W r1. 1 I 56.679 SQTT. a 5 9.,625 SQR 4 Ci SsjT \ i •�� \�— II 1 i �I \ Wi \r \ � BLOCK 3 � II .emrrL II J� I� I IROFOSED Ij j STREET uI i Y. m orr PILOT KNOB ROAD--- z I6OQ SQ II / OUARRY_LN 1 T 29,25 MIT. ..AGO SQIL I �••em 1 � 2 S• .;315 SQ IT. 9 14.735 SQ. IT. 0 m / I• x6,1x5 23.6x9 SQ IT, . A. IDIAE6A3 I I_ _, I I PRELIMINARY PMT 6RRQ IQ3V.M.3 OF � Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUN CLIFF 3RD ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat for Sun Cliff 3rd Addition Consisting of 13.5 Acres Containing 5 Duplex Lots and 4 12 -Unit Multiple Buildings -- A public hearing was held for the Advisory Planning Commission at a regular meeting held on July 23, 1985, to consider a pre- liminary plat for Sun Cliff 3rd Addition that provides platting for an approximate 13.5 acre area. The developer is proposing five duplex lots and four townhome multiple dwelling buildings over the remainder of the property. The Advisory Planning Commis- sion is recommending approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the City's Planning Consultant's report found on pages J -y3 through /3y For action that was • taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to page(s) • The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the Sun Cliff 3rd Addition and noted that it was part of the Eagan Hills West Planned Unit Development. It was noted that this development has previously made a parkland dedication. The Commission noted that trailways were completed with other developments within the area and, therefore, no recommendation for additional parks or trails dedication was made. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Sun Cliff 3rd Addition as presented. /L.), V -- CITY OF EAGAN -- SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat - Sun Cliff Third Addition APPLICANT: Patrick Hoffman and Bob Carlson LOCATION: Southwest Quadrant of Blackhawk Road & Diffley Road Part of Eagan Hills West Planned Development EXISTING: ZONING: R-4 Planned Development DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: July 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: July 17, 1985 • REPORTED BY. John S. Voss, Planning Consultant APPLICATION SUMMARY: The preliminary plat - Sun Cliff Third Addition - would provide for the platting of an approximate 13.5 acre area. The developer proposes five (5) double bungalow lots along Deer Hills Trail and four (4) townhome multiple dwelling buildings over the remainder of the property. Each of these townhome buildings would be on a separate lot and each would provide for twelve (12) dwelling units fora total of 48 multiple dwelling units. No public street dedication would be required in that the public streets for this property already exist in the area. The developer would provide for an internal private drive to serve the multiple dwelling units. ZONING AND LAND USE: The property was originally zoned Multiple R-4 several years ago and was included in the Eagan Hills West Planned Development in 1978. Under the Planned Development Agreement, the property is designated for Medium Density with a range of • nine (9) to twelve (12) dwelling units per acre. The proposed development would average 4.3 units per acre for this 13.5 acre area. Therefore, the proposed density would be below that allowed under the Planned Development Agreement. Also, this area is designa- ted R -III in Eagan's Comprehensive Plan which would provide for six (6) to twelve (12) units per acre. CODE COMPLIANCE: It appears that the proposed multiple dwelling development would meet the minimum requirements of City Ordinances. The five double bungalows, along Deer Hills Trail, would not meet the normal R-2 District requirements for two-family dwellings. Normally, a minimum one -hundred foot (100') width and 15,000 square foot area would be provided where four (4) of the proposed lots are approxnnately 85 feet wide and the five lots range in area from 10,560 square feet to 14,400 square feet. Deviations from the normal R-2 requirements can be provided in that this property is zoned R-4 _ Planned Development - and the overall density is below that permitted by the Planned Development Agreement, The proposed two-family lots would appear capable of accommodating the double bungalow units that are proposed for the property and the proposed units would meet the minimum setback requirements. 17,3 Planning Report - City of Eagan Subject: Preliminary Plat - Sun Cliff Third Addition Applicant: Patrick Hoffman and Bob Carlson Date: July 17, 1985 Reported by: John S. Voss, Planning Consultant Page 2 SITE PLANNING: The property appears to be well-designed and in keeping with develop- ment that exists in the area. The developer proposes a four -stall garage that would be separated from the multiple dwelling units by approximately 120 feet near the intersection of Beaver Dam Road and Diffley Road. It is expected that these spaces would be used by persons living in the multiple dwelling units or by the home owner's association. The building does not appear to pose a problem, but its location, away from the main structures, is somewhat unusual. The property is encumbered by a 70 foot wide gas easement and a ponding area which, to a large degree, accounts for the low density. • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - SUNCLIFF 3RD ADD APPLICANT: ROBERT CARLSON & PATRICK HOFFMAN LOCATION: SW; OF BLACKHAWK RD & DIFFLEY RD, PART OF EAGAN HILLS WEST P.D. EXISTING ZONING: R-4, MULTIPLE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 23, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 18, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT • UTILITIES & DRAINAGE: There is sanitary sewer, water & storm sewer service available to serve this development. The City will require an updated drainage & storm sewer plan with contours at 2' intervals indicating how this property will drain and shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted to the City for approval. The storm water runoff from this development is proposed to drain into Pond AP -7 which is located on the souther- ly part of this development. A storm sewer outlet pipe shall be constructed to Pond AP -7 and the outlet shall be constructed to the 889.5' elevation. The City will require a drainage and utility easement for Pond AP -7 to encompass the property below the 893.9 elevation in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. STREETS: Access to this proposed plat is by Blackhawk Rd from the east & Beaver Dam Rd from the West. • EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The City will require utility & drainage easements ten (101) feet in width adjoining all streets and five (5') feet in width adjoining side and rear lot lines. The City will require utility easements a minimum of twenty (201) feet in width for all public utilities not constructed within the street right-of-way. This item will be reviewed again when the utility plans for this subdivision have been submitted along with the final plat. The City will require that easements be obtained from Northern_ Natural Gas Co. where utilities cross said Northern Natural Gas easements or a right of entry document be obtained in order for the City to maintain City utilities crossing said natural gas easement. EROSION CONTROL & GRADING PLAN: The developer shall submit an erosion and sediment control plan to the City for review and approval. The City will require an enviro filter fence along Pond AP -7 to the south to prevent silt and debris from entering into the -storm drainage system. The developer shall submit an updated grading & drainage plan indicating the existing and proposed contours at 2' intervals with drainage arrows indicating how this property will drain. 17,5 ENGINEERING REPORT - SUNCLIFF 3RD ADDITION JULY 23, 1985 PAGE 2. ASSESSMENTS: In reviewing the assessments levied over this proposed development which consists of parcels 014-09 & 015-26 of Section 29, it was not determined if -all, the trunk related assessments have been levied to include the upgrading from the single family rate to the multi -family rate. Some further study will be required to make this determination. CONDITIONS: 1. The park dedication requirements of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be current prior to the approval_ of the final plat. 2. The smaller -sized double bungalow lots (Lots #1 through #5 of Block 1) shall be approved through the Planned Development with the understanding that no setback variances shall be granted and the normal setback requirements of the R-2 District shall be observed. • 3. The proposed four -stall garage shall be designed of the same exterior material as the multiple dwelling buildings. 4. Private Driveway and Parking Requirements: (See Engineer's Report) 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the double bungalow lots and the multiple dwelling lots prior to approval of the final plat. 6. The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee prior to the approval of the final plat. 7. All of the provisions of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be in compliance prior to the approval of the final plat. 8. Sidewalks shall be provided as required by the City Council. • 9. A landscaped area/berm shall be provided where the private driveway parallels County Road #30. 10. The developer shall furnish the City the necessary easements and/ or permanent right of entry document for the maintenance of utilities that cross the Northern Natural Gas pipeline. 11. A detailed grading, drainage & erosion & sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City for review & approval by City Staff. 12. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility & drainage easements as required by the City Staff. 13. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility & drainage easement for Pond AP -7 to encompass the required area below the 893.9 elevation in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. • • CONDITIONS (Continued) July 23, 1985 PAGE 3. 14. All costs for internal utilities & streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 15. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the Standard Engineering Conditions. 16. The City will require plan profiles of the utilities & streets to be submitted to the City for review & approval. 17. The private streets for this development shall be constructed to a minimum of 28' wide. "'OTA 00 0UN y ) LAT I A H—LI f7 A a 8 Jo) 70p- /� "P PKI CLIFtM% 7�9 ' aza z PI 75 - GEI ...(((t RA ' 4. .:.... I' Intl • ,I�'CJ J ,// _ I - I I• "• 6 / Ind.., cCMMERCIAL J' / r! RI �. .• PLANNED DEVELOPMENT r,( t•;� r i1Ilrx( � Intl ••// I I(7I LB _ RIC. pEEI l0 'Intl i•., itl :t RI LLLCC:::JJJJJ fin;• GB144, Ina ? Fffi(jJRN RVI //..� c: R.I p / ❑• .: Intl N .-. I Intl ' . NEI' LB R11 'c.� LB RII RJI,: CSC. I / i � P �Ru if .. Ind �/ V'Ibll .R ..I!, Ind �•' . ,•� � RIII 'xr i � fl -I nR.l P a ..F IG RI Ind � N i !VVV .�th> .,..•I _.T.I R -II t _ ',l , . n P I•' 313 IIS,^.; If 11 E .. tQf I i LB E — ...... R -I R.111 �t",l al' CSCIGBI R R'lll. _I�,y' RIII�RB 1 01;T§ �•//�Y-rRI ILB. / 1 7, .R- •. : ' D LB �'I�`I l RI R� P a .:: L` u R -1 R-11 ,,F /r�I P IPI R'll t 1 u j V- rrff .I R -II ♦.I R 1' R.II - P ,( - _-l- .e,i R ll R -II RII !I LJ .P P .r•.. �•..x "Ill `C✓ fs' I ___ r • nasu,ouNT •` �I I� alro:E vnLLEr r , 1. LAND USE GUIDE PLAN RESIDENTIAL R -I single family (03u umre) R -II mixed re5idential(36,"UCCre) R -III mixed residential V1 tyre) R -N multiple (•12nd/acre) INDUSTRIAL Ind mtlustrial R&D research&development COMMERCIAL LB limited business NB Mgnbornood business GB general business CSC community shopping center RSC regional shopping center RB roadside business OPEN SPACE P parks.guosi public E,M IG. schools FEB. 1981 CITY OF EAGAN \I Prollmftry Plat of: SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION 'or A. M. C. Development Corporation A Advance Developer, inc.. ic,ml, it I ROA, A MIS 1 C x J 7 - ... . .. 5 _gin,..., fyl 0 FCOUNTT I ROAD Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan �\ of: SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION for: RMC: Development Corporation B Advance Developers, Inc. N w W N wn/Y.r p4n G4.a YY W W.Y w GNB. rill �nY N••YM Mir• - n.VO BA as •A -5r •-64 SUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan �v PUBLIC STORM SEWER $ WORKS DFPGDT11AC&1 11AAnTr�.� _ FIG. * y aPProved:I s Plate and #: APC Minutes July 23, 1985 17. City staff, the developer and neighbors shall study and discuss the feasibility of moving the road to the east or west at its intersection with Towerview Road and the location of the" .road shall be established as recommended by City staff, prior to the approval of the preliminary plat by the City Council. McCrea stated that she believes that the Department of Natural Resources should review the density of the proposal before the City approves it. Voting in favor of the motion were Wilkins, Hall and Wold; voting against were Trygg and McCrea; and abstaining was Harrison. The motion passed. SUN CLIFF THIRD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman,Hall convened the public hearing regarding the application of Robert Carlson for preliminary plat approval of Sun Cliff Third Addition, • consisting of 13.5 acres and containing 5 duplex lots and 4 multiple buildings with a total of 48 units in part of the northwest quarter and northeast quarter of Section 29. Dale Runkle introduced the application and reviewed the staff report of July 17, 1985. The developer, Robert Carlson, appeared and stated that Patrick Hoffman and Chuck Winaen were also present. Carlson stated that there would be no shared hallways in the multiple units, that all of them would be for sale, that there will be three types of models ranging in price from approximately $60,000.00 to approximately $100,000.00, that there will be sixteen 1 1/2 bedroom units with 950 square feet, sixteen 2 -bedroom units with 1,096 square feet, and sixteen 2 -bedroom plus den units with 3 baths and 1,500 square feet. He stated that the double bungalow units would each have 1,064 square feet ana there would be good sound proofing in all of the buildings. Jay Tscherne, a neighboring owner on the east side of Blackhawk Road, appeared and stated that he had been assured by City staff that there would no • further access on Blackhawk Road near County Road 30, that the proposed access would come out very close to his home and that traffic would face his house directly. Jim Ashworth, a neighboring resident at 4235 Blackhawk Road stated that the proposed access along Blackhawk Road cuts across the bike path, that there could very well be flooding in the area, as his neighboring property, just to the south, has been flooded, that trees around the ponding area could be lost, ana [hat aesthetically, the proposal looks all right. Rich Hefti stated that he was not at the hearings relating to the assessments and was therefore unaware of comments that might have been made by City staff relating to the access. He stated that the access would need to be 300 feet from the intersection in order to have proper stacking distance from County Road 30. Runkle stated that the road could be shifted somewhat. Ashworth stated that Tom Colbert and Bob Rosene had stated that there would be no more accesses in that area and that all accesses from that property would come off of Beaver Dam Road. Tscherne stated that it is almost impossible to cross County Road #30 and Blackhawk, and Hefti stated that the County had assured him that a 4 - way stop at that intersection would be permanent until it is signalized, within the next five years. /33 13 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 Pat Hoffman appeared on behalf of the developer and stated that it had never been proposed that the only access for this area would be off of Beaver Dam Road, and that the developer had been assessed for the improvements along Blackhawk Road. He stated that the developer had discussed with Jerry Bourden of the Consulting Engineer's office, the possible location of the road to the north of the Ashworth property. Hefti stated that there is a pond outlet in place to control the height of the pond. Carlson stated that the foliage around the pond would not be disturbed and that the area to the north of the Ashworth property would be landscaped. Winden stated that the access road is 300 feet south of the centerline of County Road #30 and that the two driveways on the east side of Blackhawk Road are 125 feet south of the centerline and 400 feet south of the centerline, so that the. access is in between the two driveways. Hall stated that it would be appropriate to have staff look at those issues before the hearing before the City Council. Trygg asked what the developer would do if there is no access along Blackhawk Road and Carlson stated that the access would be necessary for safety and convenience, since the road would be too long for a cul-de-sac, and that only the two east buildings would probably use the access from Blackhawk Road, that two homeowners associations would be established, one for the double bungalows and one for the multiple units. McCrea stated that with the 4 -way stop at Blackhawk Road, a lot more traffic would go that route. Wilkins stated that it would be necessary to provide for landscaping to avoid disturbing neighbors with headlights. Harrison stated that the application should not be approved until it is known what statements City staff made concerning the access on Pilot Knob Road. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the public hearing until the August 27, 1985 meeting of the Advisory Planning Commission. Wold stated his belief that the question concerning the statement could be resolved prior to the City Council meeting without holding up the Planning Commission's determination, and that it would be better to have a condition on that aspect. Voting in favor of the motion were Harrison and Wilkins; voting against were Trygg, McCrea and Wold; and abstaining was the chair. Wold moved, McCrea seconded the motion to recommend preliminary plat approval of Sun Cliff Third Addition, consisting of 13.5 acres and containing 5 duplex lots and 4 multiple buildings with 48 units, in part of the northwest quarter and the northeast quarter of Section 29, subject to the following conditions: 1. The park dedication requirements of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be current prior to the approval of the final plat. 2. The smaller -sized double bungalow lots (Lots 1 through 5 of Block 1) shall be approved through the Planned Development with the understanding that no setback variances shall be granted and the normal setback requirements of the R-2 District shall be observed. 3. The proposed four -stall garage shall be designed of the same exterior material as the multiple dwelling buildings. 14 • • APC Minutes July 23, 1985 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the double bungalow lots and the multiple dwelling lots prior to approval of the final plat. 5. The preliminary plat shall be approved by the Dakota County Plat Committee prior to the approval of the final plat. 6. All of the provisions of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development Agreement shall be in compliance prior to the approval of the final plat. 7. Sidewalks shall be provided as required by the City Council. 8. A landscaped area/berm shall be provided where the private driveway parallels County Road #30 to avoid disturbing neighbors with headlights, and a landscape plan providing for such a berm shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to final plat approval. • 9. The developer shall furnish the City with the necessary easements and/or permanent right -of -entry document for the maintenance of utilities that cross the Northern Natural Gas pipeline. 10. A detailed grading, drainage and erosion and sediment control plan shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by City staff. 11. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility and drainage easements as required by the City staff. 12. The developer shall dedicate the necessary utility and drainage easement for Pond AP -7 to encompass the required area below the 893.9 elevation in accoraance with the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer plan. 13. All costs for internal utilities and streets shall be the sole responsibility of this development. • 14. The developer shall meet the applicable requirements of the Standard Engineering Conditions. 15. The developer shall submit to the City staff for review and approval planned profiles of the utilities and streets. 16. The private streets for this development shall be constructed to a minimum of 28 feet wide. 17. City staff shall determine if the City made a commitment to residents concerning no access on Blackhawk Road, and if so a determination should be made as to whether the commitment should be honored. 18. Homeowner's Association documents shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff prior to final plat approval. 19. Eagan Hills West Planned Development shall be amended at the Sun Cliff Third Addition area to be in conformity with Sun Cliff Third Addition and density not used by Sun Cliff Third Addition shall not be shifted to other parts of the Planned Development. 15 APC Minutes July 23, 1985 Voting in favor were McCrea; Wold, and Trygg; voting against were Wilkins and Harrison; and abstaining was the Chair. 'The motion passed. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded he motion'Go' adjourn the meeting at 11:10 p.m. All members voted in favor. It waa,noted that matters heard at this meeting would be reviewed by the Cit Coun.Zl on August 20. The Planning Commission Can American proposal and it without further hearing. /3,C discussed administrative changes on the eed to allow such administrative changes 1 16 Secretary - APC BS 0 • • • Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven WINE & BEER LICENSE/HONG WONG RESTAURANT H. Wine & Beer License for Hong Wong Restaurant, Cedar Cliff Shopping Center -- An application was submitted by Linda Wong requesting a beer and wine license for the Hong Wong Restaurant located at Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. The Wongs are residents of the community and plan to open the restaurant around September 1. The Eagan Police Department has reviewed the application and has no reason to recommend denial. The Cedar Cliff 1st Addition Shopping Center complex received approval at the May 1, 1984, City Council meeting. At that meeting, Mr. Durning, representing the developers for the shopping center, stated "he would agree that there would be no 24-hour operation, that the restaurant is proposed to be open from 6:00 A.M. to 9:30 P.M. with the understanding that there would be no request for liquor license in the commercial area in the future". After reviewing the official City Council minutes that list all conditions of approval, there is no condition restricting the sale of liquor whether intoxicating or non -intoxicating within the commercial area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a wine and beer license for Hong Wong Restaurant at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. X37 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-eight FINAL RESOLUTION/HOUSING BONDS - FOREST RIDGE ADDITION I. Final Resolution for Multi -Family Housing Revenue Bonds for Forest Ridge Addition -- A letter of transmittal, copies of the preliminary statement and final resolutions have all been received and reviewed by City staff regarding the final resolution for the Forest Ridge project. This project is located north of Duckwood Drive adjacent to the future alignment of Denmark and consists of 252 multi -family units. The developer is Dan Gustafson under the name of the Forest Ridge Partnership. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a final resolution for multi -family housing revenue bonds for Forest Ridge Addition in the amount of $10,960,000. • lad Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Tweinty-nine LA FONDA DE ACEBO LIQUOR LICENSE J. La Fonda De Acebo Liquor License -- During the spring of 1985, La Fonda de Acebo Restaurant was informed by the City of Eagan that a resident manager was required to hold the liquor license due to the fact La Fonda de Acebo is an out-of-state • corporation. Mr. James Geoglerius was hired and designated as the manager of the restaurant and the license application was granted by the City. The City has been notified by Mr. Geoglerius that he was terminated as the instate/resident manager late in the month of July. The City Administrator sent a .certified letter to La Fonda de Acebo advising the corporation that a new manager must be appointed and approved by the City Council according to Minnesota statutes and applicable Eagan liquor ordinances. The City has received an application from Richard Spear, a resident of Bloomington, who is now the resident manager for the La Fonda de Acebo Restaurant. A copy of Mr. Spear's personal information is enclosed without page number for each City Councilmember to review. The Police Department has performed a check on the new applicant and finds no reason to recommend denial of the licence. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny • granting a liquor license to La Fonda de Acebo with Mr. Richard Spear as the instate resident manager. X39 Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirty RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PK A. Contract 85-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedar Industrial Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) -- On Friday, August 9, sealed bids were publicly opened for the construction of the trunk storm sewer through the Cedar Industrial Park along with street improve- ments ofBla khawk Road from T.H. 13 to Comanche Road. Enclosed on page- /c/-1 is a tabulation of all bids received. The alternate bid was requested for consideration of removal of the railroad tracks along the Minnesota River Valley for the 84" storm sewer crossing in lieu of having to jack the storm sewer pipe underneath without disturbing the railroad operations. Due to the fact that all alternate bids resulted in an increase in the base bid, the staff is recommending that the alternate not be considered. This bid tabulation shows that the low bid was 21% below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 19, 1985. Based on these favorable bids, it is recommended that the Council award the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 85-5 (Cedar Industrial Park trunk storm sewer- and streets) and award the contract to the apparent low bidder, ARI Contracting, Inc., in the amount of $874,192.40. 1,40 • • CITY CONTRACT NO. 85-5 CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK STORM SEWER b"STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 428 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Fridav, Aug, 9, 1985 ALTERNATE BID ADD DEDUCT 23,000.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 8,720.00 50.000.00 20,000.00 15,430.00 34,300.00 10,100.00 12 nnn nn Engineer's Estimate - - - - - - - - - - - $1,100,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Estimate - - - - -20.5% Feasibility Report Estimate - - - - - - - $1,105,465.00 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Estimate -21.08 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1.. ARI Contracting 874,192.40 • 2. Barbarossa & Sons 916,175.00 3. Richard Knutson 921,069.15 4. L & G Rehbein 924,265.40 5. Lametti & Sons 946.000.00 6. Northdale Construction 953,075.70 7. Arcon Construction 953,656.80 8. Orfei & Sons 986,768.71 9. Progressive Contractors 1,129,140.40 10. Johnson Bros. 1.162.807.00 11. Austin P. Keller Const. 1-177 029.00 12. Lake Area Utility 1. 919.R56_90 • 13. M. Danner Trucking No Bid 14. S.J. Louis Construction No Bid 15. Lund Asphalt No Bid 16. Encon Utilities No Did 17. Winter Construction NO Bid 18. Alexander Construction No Bid. 19. Brown & Cris No Bia ALTERNATE BID ADD DEDUCT 23,000.00 30,000.00 15,000.00 8,720.00 50.000.00 20,000.00 15,430.00 34,300.00 10,100.00 12 nnn nn Engineer's Estimate - - - - - - - - - - - $1,100,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Estimate - - - - -20.5% Feasibility Report Estimate - - - - - - - $1,105,465.00 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Estimate -21.08 • Pi Agenda Information Memo August 20, 1985, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-one RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT/LEXINGTON SQ 2ND ADDN B. Contract 85-20, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Lexington Square 2nd Addition - Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer) -- Sealed bids were publicly opened on Tuesday, August 13, for the installation of trunk sanitary and storm sewer through the Lexington Square Addition east of Lexi ton Avenue and south of Wescott Road. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received which shows that the low bid was 358 below the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 7, 1985. Due to the favorable bids received, it is recom- mended that the Council award the contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS Contract 85-20 (Lexington Square and storm sewer) and award the bidder, Enebak Construction, Inc., I�� ITEM: To receive the bids for 2nd Addition - trunk sanitary contract to the apparent low in the amount of $418,267.25. Our File No. 49343 CITY C (INGTON .Mr, STORM C NO. 85-2 i 2nd ADDL TARY AND MPROVEMENI EAGAN, MINNESOTA Feasibility Report Estimate 643;400.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -- 625,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Report -33.1 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Est. -35.0 mss BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D,S.T. BID DATE: Tuesday, Aug. 13. 1985 CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Enebak Construction 418.267.25 2. Arcon Construction 4323819,40 i3. Lametti and Sons 494,000.00 4, Northdale Construction 521,662.00 5. Richard Knutson 540,399.05 6. M. Danner Trucking 550,914.00 7. Progressive Contracting 560,837.00 8. Barbarossa and Sons 561,050.00 9. Encon Utilities 5_64,141.50 10. L and G Rehbein 567,086.25 11. Brown and Cris 58 12. Lake Area Utility 6.00 SRA 157.00 13. ARI Contracting • 14. Orfei and Sons 607 819.09 619.926.81 13- S.J. Louis Construction 655,263.75 16. G.L. Contracting _672,550.75 17. Nodland Associates 787,720.00 18. Alexander Construction No Bid 19. Johnson Brothers No Bid 20. Winter Construction No Bid 21. Marmon Contracting No Bid 22. S.H. Hentges No Bid Feasibility Report Estimate 643;400.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -- 625,000.00 % (+) or (-) Engineer's Report -33.1 % (+) or (-) Feasibility Report Est. -35.0 mss MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 16, 1985 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE COMMAND BUS The command bus will be available for City Council touring at 6:00 P.M. prior to the City Council meeting on Tuesday. I informed both Fire Chief Childers and Chief of Police Berthe that members of the City Council would try and make it to the Municipal Building at approximately 6:15 for a brief inspection of the bus. SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT • The City Administrator needs to know which members of the City Council wish to play on the City Hall Softball Team which will be competing in the City softball tournament on Saturday, August 24. For additional information regarding the City Picnic/Softball Tournament, please refer to page LV -6-. SOUTH AREA TOWN MEETING Please mark your calendars for the South Area Town Meeting which is scheduled for August 22. The social hour begins at 6:00 p.m. with dinner at 7:00 and the location is the Southview Country Club in West St. Paul. NOISE COMPLAINT/GOPHER SMELTING • At the last City Council meeting, both Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Wachter expressed concerns regarding a noise complaint that was received from neighbors adjacent to the Gopher Smelting plant. This item has been reviewed by the Eagan Police Department and the faulty equipment has been repaired to the City's satis- faction. Please review the memorandum from Sergeant Stevenson found on page Zaj— . CITYWIDE CLEANUP A letter was received from Beermann Services suggesting a City cleanup for the City of Eagan. This is a form letter. Apparently, Beermann Services are proposing a fall cleanup in a number of communities. If there is any interest on the part of the City Council, this item would need to be coordinated as oon as possible. For a copy of the letter, please refer to page -f-i - PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE Meetings have been held on a weekly basis with Jack Boarman and Associates regarding the remodeling and addition to the Public Works Garage. Last Thursday, August 15, a Public Works Committee meeting was held to review the alternative plans and Informative Memo August 16, 1985 Page Two cost estimates for the proposed remodeling and addition. Direction was given to Jack Boarman to prepare 8#" x 11" reductions and cost estimates along with a general discussion on the advantages and disadvantages of each plan for distribution with the budget material late next week. City Councilmember Wachter, Chairman of the Public Works Committee, and the City Administrator would like to ask the City Council to begin the special budget workshop meeting on August 27 at 6:30 p.m., allowing time for Jack Boarman to review the information that will be distributed in advance to the City Council. The City is at a critical point where Council direction is necessary before staff and the architects can continue with the project. FALSE ADVERTISING QUESTION • There was a question raised regarding false advertising as it relates to the southeast quadrant of the Galaxy Road/Cliff Road intersection. The City's sign inspector, Mr. Elmer Borgschatz, has reviewed the question as raised by City Councilmember Wachter at a recent Council meeting. Enclosed on page is a copy of his memorandum and response. LEO MURPHY Our former mayor, Leo Murphy, had a heart attack and is being treated at the Fairview Ridges Hospital. He appears to be re- covering quite well and will be home either this weekend or next week. The City Administrator has contacted his wife to express our concerns on behalf of the City Council. CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM • A rather lengthy memorandum is enclosed regarding the City com- posting program. The Director of Parks and Recreation is asking for review of the memorandum which contains a program for City composting. If the program is acceptable to the City Council, information needs to be distributed as a part of the City news- letter. P} ease refer to the memorandum found on pages /Sb ,/ through , If time permits, as a part of Department Head Business, the Director of Parks & Recreation will be present to field any questions. s/Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 15 o m iv. CITY PICNIC/SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT SATURDAY, AUGUST 249 1985 The City Hall staff will again attempt to field a team for the City's inter -departmental softball tourna- ment scheduled for Saturday, August 24. As an attempt is being made this year to place more emphasis on this being a family picnic day for all employees, the first softball games are scheduled to begin at 8:30 a.m. A break in the ame schedule will occur at 11:00 a.m., at which time parent child -type activities will..take place, .followed by the pot -luck meal at noon. The softball,games will resume at 1:30 p.m. •I will again coordinate the Cityhall team effort this year (unless somebody else would like to do it), but I need to know how many people are interested in participating, and will actually show up for the games. Please let me know as soon as possible if you are interested in being on the City Hall softball team for this event. Ken Damlo l P.S. At the organizational meeting, job assignments were made to ensure the success of this event. The City Hall team's assignment is to cook the hotdogs for the noon picnic. Food,& facilities to be provided) Note: The opponent in the 8:30 a.m, game is the *team from the Park Dept = (" NIL - .3, ii 1 T � _ r Ise } i ,• _ — _ _ r ` F---- t � 11,( �r .0 �. . . w I h '✓ r J r. YtJt r i f 4 /',� Jy a r t+. 11 !✓- r - r 1a.-. r r t l . S .. } '3 ., tom[ rl f ." tt . ' � ::f 'G t . /1 t = + {rt\ l..-`l+r " yt. �1- � j � .• F t I ,v. Wya r. ., tJ s � r• i. L~' 1 / .+tY t � �.I +� t. y� ., r� q� t police department OF 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 August 7, 1985 TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator. FROM: Sgt. John Stevenson SUBJECT: NOISE COMPLAINT - GOPHER SMELTING JAY M. BERTHE PATRICK J. GEAGAN •dnlelMnn ns , KENNETH 0.A ZMANN opnll M,Gpwn On 8/2/85 at approximately 2116 hrs „ I received a noise complaint from Mayor Blomquist. The Mayor stated that she had received a complaint from a citizen on Chapel Lane that there was a very loud, annoying noise emanating from Gopher Smelting. I attempted to contact John Tapper from Gopher but was unsuccessful. I was able to contact the foreman, Mike Arneson. Mr. Arneson was not aware of any loud noise but he said that he would investigate it imme- diately. On 8/7/85 I spoke to John Tapper of Gopher Smelting. He informed me that the noise was found and quieted immediately after my phone call on the 2nd. It was caused by a faulty purge valve on the vacuum cleaner filtration system on the roof. The valve caused the unit to stick in the purge (self -clean) mode. Since then, the company has added a muffler to the unit to prevent future noise problems. Mr. Tapper said that they are being monitored by the M.P.C.A. and are attempting to stay within the noise pollu- tion limits and that we should feel free to direct any complaints to that agency. Jh `�'�n Stevenson JS/kg THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY A/-7 • J "Hereto Some You" August 8, 1985 Beermann Services (Specialists in Refuse Removal) 6900 Dixie Ave E., Inver Grove Heights, Mn Phone (612) 451-1855 Tom Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: Serving the Metro Area 55075 Since 1969 As you know, Autumn is right around the corner and Fall cleanup will probably be top priority for many citizens in your community, Beermann Services is interested in conducting a Fall Recycling Day and/or a Fall Cleanup Day. Materials we can handle include tires, drain oil, appliances, and all normally recycled materials. We can also handle yard debris, brush, old lumber, furniture, and other non -garbage items. An event such as this can assist your citizens in the doldrum task of Fall cleanup. I realize that an event of this nature would have to be approved by your City Council. I would also need assistance in providing a location convenient to all residents. Any help that you can give me regarding this function would be greatly appreciated. I can be reached at (612) 451-1855 or at the address listed on the above letterhead. I will be looking forward to hearing from you in the near future. Sincerely, Bernie Beermann Beermann Services Rubbish Removal and Recycling BB: jm —No Job Too Large or Too Small — MEMO TO: DALE PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM: ELMER BORGSCHATZ, SIGN INSPECTOR , ;Q DATE: AUGUST 8, 1985 HE: FALSE ADVERTISING QUESTION The City receptionist brought to my attention a telephone message stating that the sign south of Cliff and east of Galaxie suggested commercial zoning when the land.actually is zoned residential, (R-1). I have communicated with the complainant advising him that I would look into the matter. On several occasions I talked to his wife about my findings, but have been unable to speak to the complainant personally. I shall list a • number of facts that lead me to suggest that the matter can best be resolved through a legal opinion on the question of signage and related questions as follows: 1. Ex. A (attached) reads: FOR SALE 2.5 ACRES COMMERCIAL POTENTIAL 2. EX. B represents a map from the Comprehensive Guide Plan of 1979 and 1980. The area involved is circled with the red dot representing the approximate location of the sign. The area was apparently never rezoned to light business (L/B) and therefore, remained agriculture. 3. EX: Webster's Dictionary would infer by definition that potential could mean the possibility or something that can develop or become actual. 4. EX. A: The sign in question (on photo) is located 180 ft. south of Cliff Road and approximately 25 ft. east of Galaxie. The question as to whether or not false advertising is the case is the reason we need the legal opinion which may be helpful in future cases. /db • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMD03ERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: BEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION SCOTT MORGAN, PARKS AND RECREATION ASSISTANT DATE: AUGUST 9, 1985 SUBJECT: CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM This memorandum's intent is to suggest alternatives for the 1985-1986 City Composting Program as requested by the City Council at its regular meeting held on July 2, 1985. These alternatives will attempt to fit within the range of a moderate expansion of the existing program, that the Council had • requested. These alternatives are presented to the Council to supply them with specific information on possible composting programs that could be implemented as part of a city-wide solid waste reduction and resource recovery plan. The Council is asked to review the given alternatives and select one or any combinations of alternatives to be implemented. This memo summarizes background information, history of last year's Pilot Program, goals of the Composting Program, available funding and program alternatives. Background The composting of yard waste is a simple and environmentally beneficial alternative to landfill disposal or burning. Yard waste, when landfilled, does not compress well and uses up valuable landfill space. Open burning increases air pollution and is unsafe. The composting process is an attempt to copy the pathways of degradation occurring in nature, but concentrating it in time and space. Not only does composting solve a solid waste management problem, it converts the valuable organic matter available in yard waste into • a useful mulch and soil conditioner. Compost products have many excellent properties. It improves the porosity of the soil, builds it up with organics, increases water retention tilth, permeability, and reduces surface crusting and erosion. The importance of a composting program stems deeper than the above mentioned benefits. Its role as a landfill waste steam reducer has been targeted as a major immediate priority by the Metropolitan Council. The reason for making composting an immediate priority is because during spring, summer and fall yard debris make up an impressive 20-30 percent of the waste steam. Since grass and leaves are heavier than regular garbage, it constitutes as much as 40 percent of the disposal costs. Staff has developed the following program goals to guide in the planning of a City Wide Composting Program. Program Goals 1. To establish a waste reduction and resource recovery foundation that can be easily expanded to meet future demands. 150 CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 2 2. To reduce the impact on county landfill by collecting 700 cu. yds. of compostable materials in 1986. 3. To establish a composting program that is convenient and easy to understand for residents. 4. To coordinate a composting program with other waste reduction resource recovery programs within the city, county and metro area. 5. To conduct an ongoing public education and relation program on the benefits of composting and recycling. 6. To provide drop-off and pick-up services at no charge to the user. In order to present program alternatives, a brief overview of the current program is in order to greater understand the presented alternatives and • to recognize the area's expansion. Current Program The composting program was a pilot program started in the fall of 1984 and accepted leaves only. Two small sites were used and a large quantity of leaves were received. These sites, though receiving enough leaves to compost, did not produce a quality compost due to site size and inappropriate equipment to maintain the pile on a site that small. Because demand for a compost finished product this spring was greater than the current program could supply, the Parks and Recreation Department had delivered, free of charge, 96 cu. yds. of finished compost from Minneapolis. The Park and Recreation Department has also started to publicize the availability and benefits of compost in the local newspaper along with providing a referral service for recycling services and markets. Although the pilot program is considered a success, it is not without its • problems. The following is an overview of some of the problems associated with the pilot program. 1. Size of sites The initial pilot program had two small sights which were not large enough to allow for adequate piling and pile turning. 2. Site Security The pilot program did have a problem with site security. The problem was not with vandals but with people dumping this spring on leaves that have already composted, mixing leaves with the finished product making it inferior and undesirable to use. 3. Site Stability .Under current circumstances the locations are being moved each year. Because locations have been placed on undeveloped park locations, the need to move them as a park is developed has made the program inconvenient to the residents. CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 3 4. Education The current open refuse hauling system operating in the City makes it more convenient to simply bag yard waste and have it hauled away, not realizing the ramification associated with that action. 5. Manpower With the addition of a composting pilot program, additional hours were needed that were not present to adequately plan and maintain the site and educate the public. 6. Equipment The pilot program was limited by the amount of equipment owned by the City. The City restircted the program to accepting leaves only. • Program Alternatives The program alternatives listed will attempt to achieve the above listed goals and try to alleviate the problem associated with the pilot program while meeting the City Council's request for a moderate expansion. Alternative #1 A. Program location To rent a 3-5 acre semi-permanent site (3 or more year lease) which residents of the City could become familiar with and recognize as a stable composting site. The site should have good access and be secured with a locked gate to prevent illegal dumping. The site will have limited days and hours for a compostable product drop-off and compost finished product pick-up. The site will require adequate signs giving directions, days and times, and dumping restrictions. (This site could also be used as a • glass, paper and aluminum drop-off recycling center, if desired.) B. Expand compostable materials To expand the amount of compostable materials from only leaves to grass clippings, garden waste, leaves and tree waste. In order to include tree waste, grass clippings and garden waste in the expanded program it requires more compost pile maintenance and the purchasing of a wood chipper. C. Public Education Public education plays a key role in the overall development of composting program. Public education would serve to inform the residents of the existing City and metro area composting programs, recycling program markets, program and product benefits, program specifics (days open) and serve as a general public relation ,tool to further strengthen government/citizen relations. (See Appendix 1 for estimated budgets; this budget may contain "one-time" expenses - Equipment and Sign Purchases, thus are not a reflection ofeY arly operational costs.) /6'L CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 4 Alternative Pros and Cons Pros A. Program provides a great public service. B. Wood chipper would have multi uses within the City Parks and Recreation Department. Under the current situation it takes a number of trips to transport a small brush pile which in most cases is 99% air. With the addition of a wood chipper the City could yield a compostable product, an excellent mulch product for City and citizen use which would provide a means to efficiently transport waste wood. The acquisition of the wood chipper would also decrease the amount of wood presently being burned. C. Educate the public preparing them for future changes. • D. An expanded program would increase eligibility for grant-in-aid program from outside funding sources. Cons - Increase program cost - Increased pile odor because of grass clippings Alternative #2 (Alternative #2 is in addition to the above mentioned alternative.) A. Site Monitor The addition of a "site monitor" to supervise drop and pick-up location. The monitor would supervise the dropping off of all materials to insure • that all foreign debris does not contaminate the compost. The monitor would serve as reference to people searching for recycling drop-off locations and recycleable product markets. B. Compost Shredder Purchase/Rental To purchase or rent a shredder to chop the compostable materials to speed the breakdown of the materials, yielding a higher quality of compost and reduce the "size" of material in volume. Alternative #2 Pros and Cons Pros A. The monitor would be able to provide information and promote the program, answer any questions, listen to suggestions and keep compost free of unwanted debris. CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 5 B. The shredder would provide a high quality of compost which will maintain a good give-away market, or could be used by the City for forestation and park development. Cons - An increased cost - Depending on amount of compostable materials received, a shredder may not be cost effective. - Unit rental is undependable. Alternative #3 • (Alternative #3 is in addition to the above mentioned alternative.) A. Multiple drop-off areas The addition of "drop -off -locations" throughout the City would create greater convenience for the residents of the City. In order to provide this service additional manpower and equipment will be required. Ideally, a hook -type container lifter permanently mounted to a truck and 3 or 4 containers would serve this function. This service would be supplied during the fall and spring when the demand is the heaviest. Containers would be placed at locations throughout the City. Containers would be checked daily. When a container is full it is taken to the composting site, dumped and returned. More signs and publicity would also be required to institute this new program. Additional containers could be added and utilized for specific recycleable material - paper, glass and aluminum, expanding the scope of the Recycleable Program. Alternative #3 Pros and Cons • 1. The addition of drop-off sites will make it more convenient for residents of the City. 2. The equipment used in this operation would have multi use flexibility. The hook -lift equipment has many different container attachments and other truck box features. A multi use piece of equipment like this would be important if a Citywide recycling program of other material was ever implemented. Cons 1. Greater cost to program 2. Questionable added convenience If someone would drive 6 blocks to the drop-off container why wouldn't they drive a mile to the composting site? 3. Drop-off containers are very valuable to garbage and other foreign debris being dumped in them. (This problem will be magnified as waste cost increases.) 15Y_ CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 6 Alternative #4 (Alternative #4 is in addition to the above mentioned alternatives.) A. Curb side pick-up Curb side pick-up of compostable products is by far the most effective means of gathering compost. Curb side pick-up can be performed by City crews, but is more commonly done by "contracted haulers". Pick-ups are usually done one day a week, 3 or 4 times in the spring and £all. I£ a curb side pick-up were implemented a largef site may be required in order to handle the volume of materials taken in. If a City crew collected the yard waste more manhours and equipment would be required. Greater signage and publicity would also be required. Alternative #4 Pros and Cons • Pros A. Maximum collection of compostable materials H. Curb side collection would be a major step towards preparing the public for the future total source separation of recycleable materials. C. Provide a greater public service to the residents of the City. D. A recycling program could easily stem from this program. Cons The very high cost, organization time and insufficient equipment • The preceding alternatives and budget estimates, though brief, should supply enough specifics to give the Council a good idea of the general scope of the program alternatives. All the alternatives given by Staff could be implemented by the spring of 1986 and most of them could be implemented for this fall's composting season. The cost of the chosen program would most likely be offset by some outside funding sources available to the City for which this program is eligible. Site Location Alternative Locating a composting site is an important aspect of the overall program development. Possible composting sites will be evaluated on location, physical characteristics, and cost. The following criteria has been developed by Staff to evaluate possible site locations. 16�5 CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 7 A. Location The site should be located in a place that is ... - convenient to the residents who pick up and drop off materials. - easily and safely accessible from a paved road. - not a nuisance to surrounding property. - easy to secure. B. Physical characteristics The physical characteristics of the site should be ... - to have good drainage that does not flow directly into a pond or lake. - large enough to meet current and future demand (3-5 acres). - flat or lightly sloped. • C. Cost The cost for rental or purchase, site development, (making the site accessible) should be a major consideration. Staff has explored some possible site locations which meet all or some of the above mentioned criteria. These locations appear to meet the selection criteria. A. South of the City Municipal Center on city property proposed for a Civic Center. B. North of Yankee Doodle Road near the intersection of 35E on MnDOT property. C. West of Lexington Avenue in between Lexington Avenue - Lexington Way and Diffley Raod (privately owned). D. North of Cliff Road in between the North entrance ramp onto Cedar • Avenue and Nichols Road (privately owned). Staff has evaluated these sites and to date the most desirable site is the City owned property next to the Municipal Center. This site meets all the criteria and would be available for a reasonable length of time. Funding Assistance A. Dakota County Landfill Abatement Funding Assistance Grants are available for local communities within Dakota County in an initial amount not to exceed $1.00/household for qualifying landfill abatement expenses. The county will use the most recent estimates of households from the Metropolitan Council. (Note: Eagan has 10,528 households @ $1.00 = $10,528.00.) A�6 CITY COMPOSTING PROGRAM August 9, 1985 Page 8 B. Resource Recovery Grants and Loans- The grant and loan program under this subdivision is administered by the Metropolitan Council. Grants and loans are given for resource recovery projects. Grants and loans for planning may not exceed 50% of the planning cost. Grants and loans may be made for public education on the need for the resource recovery project. Grants and loans for acquisition of land and equipment and for capital improvements may not exceed 50% of the cost of the project. All projects funded must be in conformance with the approved master plan. Grants and loans will be given out January 31 of the -next year for project expenses incurred in the present year. C. Land Abatement Cost Recovery - By January 31, 1986, and each January 31 • afterwards, the director of the agency shall pay each city in the metropolitan area an amount not to exceed $.50 per household for qualifying landfill abatement and resource recovery expenses incurred in the previous calendar year. to qualify for these funds, programs must be consistent with the County master plan and expenses must be certified. (Note: Eagan has an estimated 10,528 households @ $.50 = $5,264.00, combined with the $10,528 from the County, the City has $15,792 available to start the program in '85.) All of these funds may be used in coordination with one another. Applications for funding will be measured against others as to technical suitability, cost effectiveness, applicant commitment, conformance to the Solid Waste Master Plan, completeness of project and degree of abatement. By developing a stronger composting program the City is taking some progressive steps into the future of landfill abatement and resource recovery. Landfill abatement and resource recovery are two words that the resident of this City will be hearing a lot about in the future as • landfill space becomes scarce. However, because of the action taken in the past and now over the next year's program the impact of future circumstances will not affect the resident ,of this community as profoundly. Summation/Recommendation: The City, by law, will eventually be required to have a Source Separation Program. Composting is an immediate priority. Funding from Dakota County and matching from Met Council - approximately $15,000 is available - this year alone. Alternate #2 appears to be the most reasonable approach with the site south of City Hall as the most logical location. Council Action To review the given alternatives and make a selection of one or combination of alternatives to be implemented this fall and in 1986. /5-, Estimated Budget Alternative #1 (Cost estimates based on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Metro Area.) Personnel Costs Planning and Administration Pile Maintenance Publicity Printing Signs Site Costs Rent * Site Development (Grading) Gate Equipment (New equipment needed) * Wood Chipper Contract Services Garbage Collection Insurance Total Estimated Budget Total Cost 900.00 1,400.00 700.00 225.00 900.00 3,000.00 250.00 12,000.00 60.00 150.00 $19,585.00 Appendix #1 * This is a one-time, non -reoccurring expenditure. lo, Estimated Budget Alternative #2 (Cost Estimates baserd on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Metro Area) Personnel Cost Total Cost Planning and Administration 900.00 Pile Maintenance 1,400.00 Site Monitor 1,800.00 Publicity Printing 700.00 Signs 225.00 Site Costs Rent 900.00 * Site Development 3,000.00 * Gate 250.00 Equipment (New equipment needed) * Wood Chipper 12,000.00 * Shredder/screen 29.000.00 Contract Services Insurance 150.00 Garbage Collection 60.00 (Optional shredder/screen rental) _ Total Estimated Budget $50,205.00 Appendix # 2 15 j Estimated Budget Alternative #3 (Cost estimates based on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Personnel Cost Planning and Administration Pile Maintenance Site Monitor Transporting yard waste Publicity Printing is Signs Rent * Site Development Gate Equipment (New equipment needed) * Wood chipper * Shredder/screen * Hook lift and 4 containers Contract services ' Insurance Garbage collection Optional Shredder rental Total EstimatedBudget Metro Area) Appendix #3 160 Total Cost 900.00 1,400.00 1,800.00 600.00 750.00 300.00 900.00 3,000.00 250.00 12,000.00 29,000.00 16,000.00 150.00 60.00 $67,110.00 Estimated Budget Alternative #4 (Cost estimates based on expenditures from other Composting Programs in the Metro Area) Personnel Cost Planning and Administration Pile Maintenance Site Monitor Transporting yard waste Publicity Printing Signs Rent * Site Development Gate Equipment (New equipment needed) Wood chipper Shredder/screen Hood lift, 4 containers, vehicle Contract Services Insurance Garbage collection Optional Shredder rental Curbside pick-up Total Estimated Budget Appendix #4 161 m_a_i n__1 900.00 1,400.00 800.00 600.00 850.00 350.00 900.00 3,000.00 250.00 12,000.00 29,000.00 27,000.00 150.00 60.00 18,000.00 $96,260.00 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 20, 1985 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1. Traffic Signals/Blackhawk Road & T. H. 13 2. Lapel Button 3. Athletic Field Lighting for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks 4. Declaration of Surplus Property 5. Star City Signing DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Municipal State Aid Street, Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Update 2. Boerchert-Ingersoll Trunk Storm Sewer Assessment Appeal (Gopher Smelting) MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: AUGUST 19, 1985 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY There are no items to be considered under City Attorney at this time. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Traffic Signals/Blackhawk Road & T.H. 13 --As a matter of information, a letter was received from the MnDOT District 9 Traffic Engineer, referring to their investigation regarding the City's request for a traffic signal at the intersection of Blackhawk Road and Trunk Highway 13. A cop f this letter and information is found on pages through The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss this item if desired by the City Council. There is no action required on this item. Item 2. Lapel Button --Administrative Assistant Duffy has prepared drawings for the purpose of ordering the lapel pin which will be sold and distributed as a part of the I -35E ribbon cutting ceremony in early November. The art work will be presented by the City Administrator at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction re- garding the size, color combination, wording and number of City of Eagan lapel pins to be ordered for sale and distribution through- out the City. Item 3. Athletic Field Lighting for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks --Plans and specifications are in order as are proposal forms for seeking athletic field lighting bids for the Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Park developments. The contract would include the lighting of two hockey rinks at Goat Hill Park, baseball field lighting at Goat Hill Park and hockey rink lighting at Ridgecliff'Park. Funding was allocated through the parks develop- ment bond fund and work will be performed under the direct super- vision and coordination of Contract 85-23. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny athletic field lighting for Goat Hill and Ridgecliff Parks. /�,3 CITY ADMINISTRATOR (continued) Item 4. Declaration of Surplus Property --The Parks & Recreation Department has two Kelly -Creswell line stripers which were formerly used for striping of athletic fields. These walk -behind units have been replaced by the unit the Department invented utilizing a golf cart nearly two years ago. During these past two years, the Kelly-Creswells have not been utilized by the Park Department or Public Works and, therefore, the Director of Parks & Recreation is recommending the equipment be declared surplus property and offered for sale. One unit is in reasonably good condition while the second unit is in poor condition and will require considerable maintenance and repair before it is operable. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the declaration of surplus property for the two (2) Kelly -Creswell line stripers. Item 5. Star City Signing --The Economic Development Commission had proposed the installation of Star City signs at the Interstate and freeway entrances to the City of Eagan. To install three (3) 30" X 120" interstate highway compatible Star City signs, the cost is $1,012. These signs would be installed approximately 200 to 300 feet behind the town name marker signs. Those locations are as follows: 1) Interstate 35E - north approach near its intersections with I-494 and Trunk Highway 55; 2) Interstate 35E - south approach near its interseciton with Trunk Highway 77; and 3) Interstate 494 - west approach near its overpass of Trunk Highway 13 and its intersection with Pilot Knob Road. It will be necessary to authorize the development and installation of these signs at this time if signs are to be installed by November 1, 1985, to meet the I -35E ribbon -cutting date. The City can acquire smaller signs, 18" X 84", for installation on State highways. The State will allow Eagan crews to install these signs and, therefore, the cost for six (6) signs is $426 with installation by the City crews. These signs would exist on the Cedar Freeway, T.H. 13, T.H. 3, and Highway 52. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize all or a portion of the Star City signs as presented. 14 C/ DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS item 1. Municipal State Aid Street Five Year Capital Improvement Plan Update --The State Aid Division of the Minnesota Department of Transportation is requiring the City to update the approved 1982 five year construction program. State aid uses a Council approved five year construction program for their information only. It is in no way binding onto the City to complete any of the projects the Council approves in the five year construction program. Council passed the 1982 five year construction program on January 18, 1983. Enclosed on page(s) (o and jQ is a copy of the five year construction program appr ved 'at that meeting. Enclosed on oaae5114117is the staff's recommendation for the five year construction program from 1985 to 1989. Pages Z-5 through contain location maps for each particular year's projects f -the Council's reference. As Council will note the schedule is rather aggressive. However, most of the recommended improvements result from the lack of development the City is incurring and also the Dakota County Highway Department five year capital improvement plan. The County has already approved their five year improvement plan and all indications reveal they will be attempting to follow it closely. The Public Works Director will be available to answer any questions Council may have regarding staff's recommendations for the municipal state aid street five year construction program. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the five year construction program as submitted by staff or as modified by Council. /4 J Item 2. Boerchert- Ingersoll Trunk Storm Sewer Assessment Appeal (Gopher Smelting) --On August 7, 1984, the final assessment hearing was held for the above -referenced project. At that time, Gopher Smelting submitted a written objection and followed through with a notice of appeal for the special assessments against their four parcels. This item was then forwarded to the Special Assess- ment Committee with the staff directed to prepare an appraisal. The Special Assessment Committee then reviewed all information and appraisals and reaffirmed the original amount of the asessment. Gopher Smelting pursued their appeal with a trail scheduled for August 15, 1985. This trail date has been temporarily postponed to allow the Council to consider a proposed negotiated settlement between the City and Gopher Smelting. Forwarded to the City Council without page number is a letter from our City Attorney providing information pertaining to this potential assessment appeal trial and the recommended settlement with alternative courses of action. The City Attorney and the Public Works Director will be able to discuss the issue in further detail if the Council has additional questions or concerns. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny/modify the recommended settlement regarding the special assessment appeal by Gopher Smelting under Project 381 (Boerchert-Ingersoll - Trunk Storm Sewer) and if denied, provide direction to staff pertaining to resolution of this appeal. /4 'N 077 '1 f:'; Do yo Minnesota „ .. Department of Transportation " c District 9 OFTV% 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9056.., -• North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 u r ..,. c . I] u d R•iIF ❑ U MUS p August 12, 1985 Mr. Thomas E. Angus Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik S Associates, Inc. 2335 West T.H. 36 St. -.Paul, Minnesota 55113 --- -- ---. Dear Mr. Angus: SUBJECT: C.S. 1901 T.H. 13 at Blackhawk Road Traffic Signal Request LJ 4 .1 0 Rlii i) i_l" Telephone 779-1121 As per your request, we have conducted a traffic study to see if the intersection of T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road warrants a traffic signal. A traffic volume count was taken and indicated that there is not enough traffic on Blackhawk Road to warrant a traffic signal installation. Attached is the traffic signal warrant form with traffic volumes. Also, with the planned opening of I -35E this fall, the traffic volumes on T.H. 13 should be significantly reduced. While T.H. 13 and Blackhawk Road does not warrant signalization at this time, we will continue to monitor this intersection at this time. The need still appears to be several years away. For your information, we have a resurfacing project scheduled on T.H. 13 from T.H. 77 to T.H. 55 for next year. If you desire further information about that project, please contact Mr. Jerome Sivertson, District Preliminary Design Engineer, at 779-1204. Sincerely, e Michael L. Robinson, P.E. District Traffic Engineer Attachment: 6 An Equal OypormnhY Emplojrr rnr�ira�vfT IHI IUN r- TRAFFIC STUDY . SECTION WARRANT FORM 's P IIO/ SPEED�3 N•�, LANES T u alk QJ. _..�.oMa_ J App • 1 Locations Major App. 3 �'�/B 5•B. Date - / w% GB Warrant No. y (70,00 Minor App.2 Minor App.4 au�d ,mak urB CITY OF EAGAN YEAR PROJECT MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET 5 -YEAR 1985 - 1989 SEGMENT (FROM -TO) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PREPARED 01-10-85 LENGTH PROJECT (MILES) DESCRIPTION 1985 DENMARK AV DUCKWOOD DR - YANKEE DOODLE RD 0.50 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DUCKWOOD DR KRESTWOOD LN - DENMARK AV 0.34 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DEERWOOD DR 0.25 MI E PILOT KNOB - DENMARK AV 0.20 44' STREET CONSTR 1985 DENMARK AV DEERWOOD DR - 0.12 MI S OF WESCOTT 0.38 44' STREET CONSTR 1985 TOTAL 1956 YANKEE DOODLE RD TH 13 - FEDERAL DR 0.93 4 LANE RECONSTR 1986 YANKEE DOODLE RD 135E - LEXINGTON AV 0.75 4 LANE RECONSTR 1986 NICOLS RD CLIFF RD - BEAM D' RUE DR 1.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 NORTHVIEW PARK RD LEXINGTON AV - 0.5 MI EAST 0.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 WESCOTT RD LEXINGTON AV - S HILLS DR 1.00 52' STREET CONSTR 1986 DEERWOOD OR 135E - PILOT KNOB RD 0.38 48' STREET CONSTR 1986 TOTAL 1987 JOHNNY CAKE NUC RD 0.6 Mf N HICKORY HILL - DIFFLEY RD 0.317 44' STRt:F:T CONSTR 1987 BLACKIIAWK Jill SILVER BELL RD - TH 13 0.73 44' STRt.Fr WIDENING 1987 BLACKHAWK RD DIFFLEY RU - DEENWOOD DR 0.60 44' S'1'Ht:t:l' WIDENING 1987 W BLUE GENTIAN RD TH 55 - ROBINS ADOII 0.45 44' STREET COUSTR 1987 RATIN RD SHALE LANE - BEAU D' HUE DR 1.31 36' STREET RECONSTR 1987 TOTAL 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR WILDERNESS RUN RD - DIFFLEY RD 0.62 52' STREET COUSTR 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.06 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 NORTHVIEW PARK RD 0.5 MI E LEX AV - S WESC'T HLLS RD 0.25 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 WESCOTT RD S HILLS DR - TH 149 1.00 52' STREET WIDENING 1988 LEXINGTON AV YANKEE DOODLE RD - 1.75 MI SOUTH 1.75 4 LANE RECONSTR 1988 TOTAL 1989 JOHNNY CAKE RDG RD DIFFLEY RD - DEERWOOD DR 0.71 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.30 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 14ORTEIVIEW PARK RD S WESCOTT HILLS DR - DODD RD 0.95 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 WILDERNESS RUN RD LEXINGTON AV - DODD RD 1.23 44' STREET WIDENIIIG 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - CLIFF RD 1.06 44' STREET WIDENING 1989 TOTAL 1965 - 1989 TOTALS (1) FROM DAKOTA COUNTY HWY DEPT 5 -YEAR PLAN (2) 44' STREET CONSTR RATE LESS EST'D GRADING COSTS REVISED 08-15-85 TOTAL EST'D " PROJECT COSTS $455,250 $309,570 $148,160 $281,504 $1,194,484 $410,850 (1) $405,405 (1) $1,365,750 $370,400 $910,500 $300,656 $3,763,561 $240,000 (2) $83, B04 $68,080 $333,360 $761,900 $1,487,944 I $564,510 $765,248 $185,200 $190,963 $779,625'(1) $2,505,546 $525,966 $963,040 $703,760 $282,408 $243,376 $2,718,552 4iiil milli $11,670,087 CITY OF EAGAN YEAR PROJECT MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET 5 -YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1985 - 1989 PREPARED 01-10-65 SEGMENT (FROM -TO) LENGTH PROJECT (MILES) DESCRIPTION 1985 DENMARK AV DUCKWOOD DR - YANKEE DOODLE RD 0.50 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DUCKWOOD DR KRESTWOOD LN - DENMARK AV 0.34 52' STREET CONSTR 1985 DEERWOOD DR 0.25 MI E PILOT KNOB - DENMARK AV 0.20 44' STREET CONSTR 1985 DENMARK AV DEERWOOD DR - 0.12 MI S OF WESCOTT 0.38 44' STHEET CONSTR 1985 TOTAL 1986 YANKEE DOODLE RD TH 13 - FEDERAL DR 0.93 4 LANE RECONSTH 1986 YANKEE DOODLE RD 135E - LEXINGTON AV - 0.75 4 LANE RECONSTR. 1986 NICOLS RD CLIFF RD - BEAU D' RUE DR 1.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 NORTHVIEW PARK RD LEXINGTON AV - 0.5 MI EAST 0.50 44' STREET CONSTR 1986 WESCOTT RD LEXINGTON AV - S HILLS DR 1.00 52' STREET CONSTR 1986 DEERWOOD DR 135E - PILOT KNOB RD 0.38 48' STREET CONSTR 1986 TOTAL 1987 JOHNNY CAKE RUG RD 0.6 MI N HICKORY HILL - DIFFLEY RD 0.38 44' STREET CONSTR 1987 BLACKHAWK RD SILVER BELL RD - TH 13 0.73 44' STREET WIDENING 1987 BLACKHAWK RD DIFFLEY RD - DEERWOOD DR 0.60 44' STREET WIDENING 1987 W BLUE GENTIAN RD TH 55 - ROBINS ADDN 0.45 44' STREET CONSTR 1987 RAHN RD SHALE LANE - BEAU D' RUE DR 1.31 36' STREET RECONSTR 1987 TOTAL 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR WILDERNESS RUN RD - DIFFLEY RD 0.62 52' STREET CONSTR 1988 S WESCOTT HILLS DR DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.06 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 NORTHVIEW PARK RD 0.5 MI E LEX AV - S WESC'T HLLS RD 0.25 44' STREET CONSTR 1988 WESCOTT RD S HILLS DR - TH 149 1.00 52' STREET WIDENING 1988 LEXINGTON AV YANKEE DOODLE RD - 1.75 MI SOUTH 1.75 4 LANE RECONSTR 1988 TOTAL 1989 JOHNNY CAKE ROG RD DIFFLEY RD - DEERWOOD DR 0.71 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - WESCOTT RD 1.30 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 NORTHVIEW PARK RD S WESCOTT HILLS DR - DODD RD 0.95 44' STREET CONSTR 1989 WILDERNESS RUN RD LEXINGTON AV - DODD RD 1.23 44' STREET WIDENING 1989 DODD RD DIFFLEY RD - CLIFF RD 1.06 44' STREET WIDENING 1989 TOTAL 1985 - 1989 TOTALS (1) FROM DAKOTA COUNTY HWY DEPT 5 -YEAR PLAN (2) 44' STREET CONSTR RATE LESS EST'D GRADING COSTS REVISED 08-15-85 TOTAL EST'D - PROJECT COSTS $455,250 $309,570 $148,160 $281,504 $1,194,484 $410,850 (1) $405,405 (1) $1,365,750 $370,400 $910,500 -'- $300,656 $3,763,561 $240,000 (2) $83,804 $68,980 $333,360 $761,900 $1,467,944 $564,510 $785,248 $185,200 $190,963 $779,625 (1) $2,505,546 $525,968 $963,040 $703,760 $282,408 $243,376 $2,718,552 IFk4Mkk kli kil $11,670,087 I MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREET SYSTEM 5 -Year Construction Program For (State Aid Expenditures Only) RL• V E ;'U E Present State Aid Construction Balance June 30, 19 9.2 = Estimated Annual Construction Allotment $ ,4a * .741 X 4 = .Estimated Total State Aid Allotment for Programming Purposes ESTIMATED EXP=:7D3 LtlR::S 1/2 $ G4 V3 Year Estimated of State Aid Yknenditure Ter -mini Project Description Expenditure On Blackhawk Rd From Cliff Road Grading, Base & 1983 To CSAR 30 Surfacing Length 1.0 mi $ 460,000 On Lexinaton 1983 From CSAH 30 Base & Surfacing g To ES—AH 32 (City's share) $ 160,000 Length 1.06 mi on Silver Bell 1984 From T.H. 13 To Blackhawk Rd Overlay 50,000 $' Length 0.80 'ml On Duckwood 1984 From Krestwood Base & Surfacing To Dehmark $ 220,000 Length 0.34 mi On Deerwood 1985 From Riverton To T_35F Br;dcp Grading, Base & $ 60,000 Lenth 0.1 mi Surfacing On Denmark 1985 From Duckwood Grading, Base & To Yankee Doodle Surfacing$ 320,000 Length 0.5 mi w 2/2 ESTI ,Mr) Year Estimated of State Aid Exoanditure Termini Project Oescrintion E:menditure On Denmark 1986 From 0. 12 mi s Wescott Grading, Base & To Deerwood Surfacing $ 240.000 Lenth 0.38 mi On Johnny Cake Ridge 1986 Fromm .6 mi n Hick.Hil Grading, Base & To CSAH 30 Surfacing $ 180,000 Len.-th 0.38 mi On Johnnv Cake Ridge 1987 From CSAH 30 Grading, Base & To Deerwood Surfacing $ 440,000 Length 0.71 mi On Deerwoodm 1988 Fro0.5 mi w Pilot Kn b To Pilot Knob Grading, Base & a 330.000 Length 0.5 mi Surfacing On From 5 -YEAR TOTAL 2,460,000 To r Len3th On Fro.., To Length On From To $ Lcn;,th On From To Lcn3th 17�-- J .J ' g?fir I °uti, I� I '� xooasxmE vex�0 ,6 I is �O .`i // I "' : g.F °rte s [ r �'!-st• [� h Irua V� ��!� •IIs P � CN, ft TO'LE4wY VAPR `HIL's Gf L-•A— Ls�� ranurY !l"J�: s:�og� _.il:" I 1 ftsuc eawase Ilu xue ...HI rovws[ 2 F G/L l �I [/P[ aerr •are 'teu•,C `T y u _ wVor _ Zplalfz._ •h �_-Ti y}4'7f t�ICRNIvf �'1GrL19PPAr _ r- tstu11.E ("�-�1 �wirT .Ls ]- c olyj I oM`•Yii moi. ..emrn, vA;� wrxaiam �T ; 31' %•'�_irk��l$n�tI.iwsr �,/ i� 1 �.— a•- '�` Tz�`[�•—'—Tl�' ...anC: I' °n 3 ply Y •. �r\l_I,] =�uCwR ' � ��Y l�1 IIAICX l ..n .- �Y 1 .•u+ L -^•i: ] /� l%"�""u.lt✓ly' -ull 2rr L g_ A .� aq\i a�rP2e, :4�-'iY LIZ` 10 f$i� [Y"��+1'II ' 1 -s.FIT � ., a a„ 8� srHILL wcw[E s . : o' • `qI,^°�[� - NPP atR. LJ �.[,-'f0 _ "`.'�' ••[ �.u_—._ wm. - O IT 1985 MUNICIPAL -STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ^I: DENMARK AV,. DUCKWOOD DR: YANKEEDOODLE RD 2 DUCKWOOD DR, KRESTWOOD LN. —: DENMARK. AV - 3 :: DEERWOOD DR,'. PILOT KNOB' DENMARK: AV 4' DENMARK AV,. DEERWOOD DR. DEERCLIFF LN' �1_1 198-6 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1: YANKEE DOODLE RD.. TH 13 -: FEDERAL DR 2 YANKEE DOODLE RD.: 135E - LEXINGTON AV '3 ::.NICHOLS, RD,: CLIFF RD -: BEAUDE RUE 4: : NORTHVIEW PARK RD.. LEXINGTON AV -: 0.5 MI EAST 5: : WESCOTT RD .: LEXINGTON. AV -. S: HILLS DR 6: :: DEERWOOD DR,: 135E: - PILOT KNOB RD 1Y ° e o E F y N m I MEHDOTA •� !;I HV0H7SL MEW T. r 3=... •'� �'�'•7L�i_I_!_ M / /RFs t.. e » _e a,.i:+� P• e wag 0� f✓0t0 0tom I �•eis i . v- a a \. '� IV; �_.. 6 40. IFFF 1 II .{� �j!/�' -9., •:sw.�l � T1•+4d f' �.i it�� I ' ;y....q :I 7 .' �\�N•..,'77��..aM1 �\11 +A =�a_ tee:' •1 i_e I i 14=4R a�5 7-moi T • • Ir.. n• ems— /.rte r "'°r:� '-=, s •�.:, gg27 - 12' ing 1 5j I— 9,/ i�E' .'.ga` iti•y L� a f. 3i ,' .rti � ;a:,� ... / 1 I v� ^" }�. �_ ' rV. •;: �.. . r:sv:a All -:r .— �y ,�'4.,�_ i •O ^i "1. i.�..4,.L. �-�.1--,- f? � -all; `�' ��JO, _ _ a-, Jy`` 1 i life m�� '� y .Az.f - r ::,� 1�e ,-•"'" ti'::f [yam `•` F ear- � �� -.m -• ! I a'�1`ye l`7 ..y-�� ` r �:;,y-�', �l`e'��^�.' I Q ;'r�'�"�.:.e,. 1987 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS JOHNNYCAKE' RIDGE RD,: 0.6, MI' N HICKORY' HILL. -: DIFFLEY' RD 2: :: BLACKHAWK: R.D.: S.ILVERBELL. R.ID - TH' 13 3 :: BLACKHAWK RD,, DIFFLEY RD -' DEERWOOD DR 4 W BLUE GENTIAN RD, TH 66' -' TH 149 6. RAHN RD,: SHALE LN - BEAU' D'' RUE DR - //J .1988 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1 :. 8 WESCOTT HILL DR.. WILDERNESSRUN'. RD -: DIFFLEY RD 2: :: S WESCOTT HILLS- DR,. DIFFLEY RD' -: WESCOTT RD 8: ; NORTHVIEW PARK RD,. 0.5 MI E LEX AV' -' 8' WESCOTT HILLS- DR 4";: WESCOTT RD., 8 HILLS DR -' TH 149 5 LEXINGTON AV,. YANKEE DOODLE RD -: 1.76' MI SOUTH 176 -. 1Ji1 5• - a " , v.cwr •�. CdAw/IGL u a 9/9UC1-%' •Yp. ii" •• •/}•, 1.. N/L[S GIXI 4ivafF 11 I � E ew[ I "'o"-- Ls Y� '- �j ✓ 3T� °nwf IOr 9 wAPL'6liJSi A+3- • carrm, /.oar—.; .. ' —� �ygfUQRpPI Yp Lsw. LxiwR L - sdx "L"r " .Tqa- ' CQL1fM 3/(/fyf`'saa<v �= uatn �! we�rwPAADenEsr _ _ •_\_l_P_H_ _ .... _S_'____ - -¢�� .L.s... a IF�� Riiiy'1 Ys LL DIFFLEY RD -: 2 E--DODD RD,: DIFFLEY RD -'. A. 2 1. 3_ l`QQQ:--•.� :�•••3•:: WESCOTT HILLS 77 f AZNT?W/M1I1 ICN , ( IT. .. �� "• ::WILDERNESS RUN RD, LEXINGTON r`•'• fARX 512 2 • 5 its �S' L,� _ . J `;:F f; �nq�- =�\ I y}: i ' .rF Gi\1 SII IIq`y}�.}� � �]f�cYLe�9T[: ee;. :',.� �..•oI A"—L�S.Lr".n.Iiil a.Yai:'� a L-.{a"vfFwFE rc• j g Q��n s '. `- r COAT I P cA I -Lam.:'= IJSQcr qx .. II.9�\� Pd AR ^ p �J lM•s1J :L. fir' 3 �' �,• a°ri • /6 V _ �Ha N • = L —Z a v0 `: O i16,• ` a'?�a'^ae•�I `c-.�r�r`a�_. ..•n C I 5 I " 4 f� l'r'• ff d f•y'': 1/ wd L..F XILL PARR 1.�'Z, SCXwdMZ'.: I �o RC5/OF -e SAR I! ._-:uYu" n a �i L8" _ ll.� IARf AA... -'r ii I� ��a_•C'/�xS T �%s RC�r • a `` M ®' fIIiIAC$13 9 oR S � tr��• ��-�" 1.. 1�/ �[?XE: oa w �� L � g,11 t atmos+ •_ - 11:�L ` - Ste•}�• � •• � f• .• 4'y �,::. 4 t'• .: •q F(,l � `� �' L -,�,�-TARE-•rl� °t i�� I a /\`6 � ��s �,Al•N � z �'•SR-�\qs n(�' = as � � i(nrN c Lae. yq� O". _ L°Yry�r � Mt �N:V':[n.i 1� ii'1��, n L ' Y MRRE �(�q•��` -� � 'i�_ __3J ^ �•tl � � rP•Y �.,,se� - IMR PowO •��Y�+ /��'i \3 _ 4r ..:A' ?I n,ZciY��tfi •Lne49 li n 1 �z" •'xd / aAarls / �� A.aRLnFw •�� •. � 4 M ra SS .0 ` t L • �S•fir`LP I a- -0Iy rt r�i. .'d LyF l 14 '1y �,• I" " I , wd[.S iFA' •w JFLNu.itO` A_ �� LY' fAP/RV��J�%�f� '•' U!M/M�sw�� '- IlLL 11��s` /� `1F '..h1 1446ali5!' [ 4YY ell 1989 MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET CAPITAL IMPROVMENTS 4 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD,: DIFFLEY RD -: DEERWOOD DR 2 E--DODD RD,: DIFFLEY RD -'. WESCOTTRD 3_ *_NORTHVIEW PARK RD,. S WESCOTT HILLS DR - DODD_ RD 4. ::WILDERNESS RUN RD, LEXINGTON AV -' D O D D RD 5 :"'DODD RD,. DIFFLEY RD -: CLIFF RD 177