Loading...
10/22/1985 - City Council RegularMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 22, 1985 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, October 22, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Hall, and members Trygg, Wilkins and Harrison. Absent were members Mulrooney, McCrea, Bohne and Wold. Also 'present were Assistant City Engineer Rich Hefti, City Planner Dale Runkle, ana Assistant City Attorney Dave Keller. AGENDA Chairman Hall dispensea with the roll and stated that he would like to add discussion regarding the November 12, 1985 PUD special review meeting and the December meeting for the Planning Commission, at the end of the Agenda. Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the Agenda with the above noted changes. All members voted in favor. MINUTES Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the September 17, 1985 meeting. All members voted in favor. NORWEST 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Pursuant to staff recommendation, Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the preliminary plat for Phase II strip shopping center until the November 26, 1985 meeting to allow the applicant and staff adequate time to review the proposal. All members voted in favor. CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK - MINI -STORAGE NORMAN POQUETTE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing concerning the application of Norman Poquette for a conditional use permit for a live-in on-site apartment and a zero lot line variance for mini -storage on 1.7 acres on Lot 2, Block 1, Cedar Industrial Park located in the southwest quarter of Section 17, adjacent to Seneca Road. Dale Runkle presented the application which provided for a conditional use to allow an on-site apartment for the caretaker of the facility. In addition, the facility was to be designed so that the outside of 11 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 the garages would act as a fence for the property, with internal circulation for users of the facility. It was indicated that the proposal exceeded the 352 lot coverage requirement to the extent that there would be 45%. lot coverage. Concern was raised regarding the ability of the adjacent landowner, Power Tool, to expand its building, due to the zero lot line proposal. The owner responded, indicating that he thought Power Tool had maximized its lot coverage already. The owner also described the project as being a strictly one-story building with concrete and brick trim on the outside providing an aesthetically pleasing building as compared to a Bloomington site. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend denial of the conditional use permit based upon establishing adverse precedent; lot coverage in excess of the amount allowed; and the need for present and future easements across the property. Ali voted in favor. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall next convened the public hearing for the conditional use permit requested by Naegele Outdoor Advertising for an advertising sign located on the Osman Temple property, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section.4, near Highways 1113 and I-494. Planner Runkle presented the application indicating that the sign was within the Ordinance, being 40 feet in height, although the size of the sign exceeded the 250 square foot standard for advertising signs. It was indicated that in its discretion, the Council had in the past, occasionally approved signs of this size adjacent to major highways. It was pointed out that one or more signs already existed in front of the Lost Spur and there were questions raised whether this created a spacing problem under the City Code. The representative of Naegele indicated that the property on which the sign was to be located was not the original Osman property but a parcel recently acquired adjacent to the location of the Lost Spur. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to table the application for 30 days for staff review to determine the type of sign presently in existence at the Lost Spur and its relationship to the applicant's sign. All voted in favor. BEAUTY SALON - DIANE HAWKINS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Diane Hawkins for an in-home beauty salon in an Agricultural District, located in the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 36, near Dodd Road. Dale Runkle reviewed the staff report indicating that the house was located on a five acre lot set back with the road from a long driveway. Such uses have been allowed before when restricted to the conditions required under the Ordinance and set by the City. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit subject to compliance with all relevant City and State codes. All voted in favor. 2 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 CENTURY ADDITION - DONALD KLOBER - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/SIGN Next, Chairman Nall convened the public hearing on the application of Don Klober of Century 21 for a lighted sign for Century 21 located on Lot 2, Block 2, Century Addition in that part of the southwest quarter of Section 9, off Yankee Doodle Road, west of Coachman Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application indicating that the sign met City Code requirements. Wilkins questioned the ability of the second commercial building in the Century Addition to have a sign for its facility. The applicant indicated that he had discussed the situation with the neighboring owner and that there was sufficient room for a smaller sign of the type normally used by that type of a business. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval'of the conditional use permit. All voted in favor. RADIO TOWER - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ROBERT BEIRSDORF Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Robert Beirsdorf for an amateur radio tower to be located on Lot 4, Block 1, Park Cliff 2nd Addition in that part of the northeast quarter of Section 34 on Parkridge,Court. Dale Runkle presented the application, indicating that the lot was presently vacant and that the owner and proposed builder, Mr. Beirsdorf was requesting approval of the amateur radio tower prior to commencement of construction on the lot. Mr. Runkle indicated that City Code allows a tower up to 37.5 feet. Mr. Steve Thal, an attorney for Mr. Beirsdorf, appeared and supplied additional information to the Commission indicating that Mr. Beirsdorf's prior neighbors did not object to the tower and that the FCC had acted in regard to towers in residential neighborhoods. Although it appeared that the tower could be cranked up to a height of 55 feet, the applicant indicated that it would not exceed the 37 feet indicated which would be even with the maximum height of the proposed dwelling unit and only 7 feet in excess of the height of the garage behind which the tower would be located, also being sheltered by trees on the sides and back of the lot. Adjacent owners did appear and address the commission, expressing concern about the aesthetics of the neighborhood, electronic interference, and an adverse precedent. A petition was submitted, signed by 33 people from approximately 15 households. Covenants were discussed by the adjacent owners indicating that exterior towers were not allowed unless approved by the architectural control committee. Mr. Dick Winkler appeared as the owner and developer of the area.and indicated that a tower had been constructed in Park Cliff 1st Addition, which resulted in the drafting of covenants for the 2nd and 3rd Additions, which did not allow radio tower without the architectural committee approval. He did not indicate whether the architectural control committee would approve the proposed tower. Questions were also raised as to an apparent error in the Abstractor's list which resulted in many homeowners not having notice of this hearing. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to postpone the hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant to meet with the owners in the area and for staff to review the issues thereto. All voted in favor. Dale Runkle then pointed out that if the tower is restricted to less than 37.5 feet, that it is not necessary to obtain a conditional use permit. Thus, the application could be withdrawn. 3 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 CARLSON ACRES - WAIVER OF PLAVLOT SPLIT - DAVID b DEBRA BAILEY Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Debra and David Bailey for a lot split of Lot 2, Carlson Acres, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 28, adjacent to Diffley Road and west of Pilot Knob Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application and indicated that the County had advised the City that a service drive for County Road #30 is anticipated in its construction plans for upgrading that road, which would mean that the driveway requested for the lot split would be merely an interim access. Mr. Harold Peterson of James R. Hill, appeared on behalf of the applicant and advised the Commission that he had a signed access permit from Dakota County and requested that the motion be scheduled for the November -6, 1985 council meeting, if possible. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to compliance with City Code. All voted in favor. It was indicated that the matter would be scheduled for the November 6, 1985 Council meeting, if acceptable to the Council and staff. All voted yea. BRITTANY FIRST ADDITION - TOLLEFSON BUILDER'S, INC. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Tollefson Builders, Inc. for extension of the conditional use permit for a temporary model home in Brittany 1st Addition, Lot 4,, Block 2, on Norwood Drive. Dale Runkle presented the application, indicating to the Commission that the present dwelling unit had been designated as a model home for five years. It appeared that Brittany 1st Addition was 94% completed and that the developer was requesting a six month extension in order to sell the property, and move his business. Mr. Rudolph appeared on behalf of the adjacent homeowners in Brittany Addition, indicating that the model home was constructed in 1980 as a parade home, with the builder representing to owners that as a parade home, the home would be sold in the near future. The surrounding owners complained that the home was not only a model home, but a construction office with construction crews, trucks and other vehicles constantly arriving, departing and parking at the location. It was the homeowner's position that the proposed use was a violation of the covenants put in place by Tollefson Builders, and that the lot next to the dwelling was being used entirely as a gravel parking lot. The owners expressed concern regarding small children in the area, due to the large amount of traffic, litter and presence of construction workers. There were complaints of lawn damage to surrounding homes, traffic and double parking problems, operation of the business beyond normal hours, and the parking of construction vehicles overnight and on weekends. There were also complaints about snow removal in the parking area burdensome to adjacent property owners. Mr. Wayne Bevers appeared on behalf of Tollefson Builders as the controller for Tollefson. He indicated the need for the temporary extension in order to comply with the needs of the neighborhood and to move the business. Chairman Hall pointed out that model homes are not the same as a construction office and that moving to another location will not suffice as a business and is not to be located in a model home under City Code. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to deny the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions and instructions: 4 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 1. That a construction office is not an allowed use for a residential home or model home. 2. That future model homes not be used as a construction office. 3. That the 'City enforce removal of the construction office by legal methods, if necessary. 4. That the adjacent parking area be corrected by enforcement of the zoning and subdivision ordinances along with the applicable development contract. All voted in favor. SLICER'S PIZZA RESTAURANT DRISCOLL MILLER INVESTMENTS, INC. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Driscoll Miller Investments, Inc. for a conditional use permit for on -sale wine and beer at Slicer's Pizza Restaurant, Lot 1, Block 2, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, located in that part of the southeast quarter of Section 30, at Nicola Road and Cliff Road. Dale Runkle presented the application, indicating that a conditional use was required in addition to a separate application for a beer and wine license, which was being processed simultaneously through the Police Department, City.Clerk and State. Review of the application indicated that it appeared to be a restaurant facility, as opposed to a bar. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion to approve the conditional use, subject to compliance with all City Code requirements. All voted in favor. TOWN CENTRE 70 - PRELIMINARY PLAT - DETAILED SITE PLAN REVIEW The Planning Commission next considered the detailed site plan for Town Centre 70 regarding the replatting of Outlot D and Lot 1, Town Centre 70 First Addition, providing for the construction of a 57,000 square foot Rainbow Food Store and 96,000 square foot shopping center. City Planner Dale Runkle presented the information, indicating that Planning Commission's action was a formality since there was lack of proper notice for public hearing. There was discussion regarding coverage, setbacks, parking spaces, and elevations. Mr. Runkle indicated that the proposal would still be subject to detailed landscaping and erosion control, drainage and grading and architectural plans. The developer indicated that they also wished to propose replatting of Outlots A and C. Trygg moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the proposal, subject to meeting all staff requirements and City Code provisions, including the following: 1. The applicant shall submit: 61 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 a. A detailed landscape plan. b. A detailed grading plan with berming. c. A lighting plan showing lumination areas. 2. The building shall be architecturally treated the same -on all sides. 3. A conditional use permit will be required for the proposed signage. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for installing a 6 inch watermain loop for fire protection. The location and layout shall be.approved by City staff. 5. The applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot utility easement over the watermain fire loop and hydrant Leads. 6. All applicable standard engineering conditionsshall apply. 7. The existing easements shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. 8. The applicant's proposal shall not exceed environmental assessment thresholds. All voted yes. NOVEMBER 12, 1985 - PD REVIEW Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the agenda submitted by staff with the recommendation that the first portion dealing with PUD special review, not require over 10 minutes. All voted in favor. DECEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to reschedule the December, 1985 meeting from December 24, to December 19, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. All voted yes. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Harrison, seconded Hall, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. All voted in favor. Secretary - APC 2 DGK MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 22, 1985 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, October 22, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Hall, and members Trygg, Wilkins and Harrison. Absent were members Mulrooney, McCrea, Bohne and Wold. Also 'present were Assistant City Engineer Rich Hefti, City Planner Dale Runkle, ana Assistant City Attorney Dave Keller. AGENDA Chairman Hall dispensea with the roll and stated that he would like to add discussion regarding the November 12, 1985 PUD special review meeting and the December meeting for the Planning Commission, at the end of the Agenda. Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the Agenda with the above noted changes. All members voted in favor. MINUTES Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the minutes of the September 17, 1985 meeting. All members voted in favor. NORWEST 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Pursuant to staff recommendation, Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the preliminary plat for Phase II strip shopping center until the November 26, 1985 meeting to allow the applicant and staff adequate time to review the proposal. All members voted in favor. CEDAR INDUSTRIAL PARK - MINI -STORAGE NORMAN POQUETTE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing concerning the application of Norman Poquette for a conditional use permit for a live-in on-site apartment and a zero lot line variance for mini -storage on 1.7 acres on Lot 2, Block 1, Cedar Industrial Park located in the southwest quarter of Section 17, adjacent to Seneca Road. Dale Runkle presented the application which provided for a conditional use to allow an on-site apartment for the caretaker of the facility. In addition, the facility was to be designed so that the outside of 11 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 the garages would act as a fence for the property, with internal circulation for users of the facility. It was indicated that the proposal exceeded the 352 lot coverage requirement to the extent that there would be 45%. lot coverage. Concern was raised regarding the ability of the adjacent landowner, Power Tool, to expand its building, due to the zero lot line proposal. The owner responded, indicating that he thought Power Tool had maximized its lot coverage already. The owner also described the project as being a strictly one-story building with concrete and brick trim on the outside providing an aesthetically pleasing building as compared to a Bloomington site. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend denial of the conditional use permit based upon establishing adverse precedent; lot coverage in excess of the amount allowed; and the need for present and future easements across the property. Ali voted in favor. NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall next convened the public hearing for the conditional use permit requested by Naegele Outdoor Advertising for an advertising sign located on the Osman Temple property, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section.4, near Highways 1113 and I-494. Planner Runkle presented the application indicating that the sign was within the Ordinance, being 40 feet in height, although the size of the sign exceeded the 250 square foot standard for advertising signs. It was indicated that in its discretion, the Council had in the past, occasionally approved signs of this size adjacent to major highways. It was pointed out that one or more signs already existed in front of the Lost Spur and there were questions raised whether this created a spacing problem under the City Code. The representative of Naegele indicated that the property on which the sign was to be located was not the original Osman property but a parcel recently acquired adjacent to the location of the Lost Spur. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to table the application for 30 days for staff review to determine the type of sign presently in existence at the Lost Spur and its relationship to the applicant's sign. All voted in favor. BEAUTY SALON - DIANE HAWKINS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Diane Hawkins for an in-home beauty salon in an Agricultural District, located in the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 36, near Dodd Road. Dale Runkle reviewed the staff report indicating that the house was located on a five acre lot set back with the road from a long driveway. Such uses have been allowed before when restricted to the conditions required under the Ordinance and set by the City. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit subject to compliance with all relevant City and State codes. All voted in favor. 2 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 CENTURY ADDITION - DONALD KLOBER - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/SIGN Next, Chairman Nall convened the public hearing on the application of Don Klober of Century 21 for a lighted sign for Century 21 located on Lot 2, Block 2, Century Addition in that part of the southwest quarter of Section 9, off Yankee Doodle Road, west of Coachman Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application indicating that the sign met City Code requirements. Wilkins questioned the ability of the second commercial building in the Century Addition to have a sign for its facility. The applicant indicated that he had discussed the situation with the neighboring owner and that there was sufficient room for a smaller sign of the type normally used by that type of a business. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval'of the conditional use permit. All voted in favor. RADIO TOWER - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ROBERT BEIRSDORF Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Robert Beirsdorf for an amateur radio tower to be located on Lot 4, Block 1, Park Cliff 2nd Addition in that part of the northeast quarter of Section 34 on Parkridge,Court. Dale Runkle presented the application, indicating that the lot was presently vacant and that the owner and proposed builder, Mr. Beirsdorf was requesting approval of the amateur radio tower prior to commencement of construction on the lot. Mr. Runkle indicated that City Code allows a tower up to 37.5 feet. Mr. Steve Thal, an attorney for Mr. Beirsdorf, appeared and supplied additional information to the Commission indicating that Mr. Beirsdorf's prior neighbors did not object to the tower and that the FCC had acted in regard to towers in residential neighborhoods. Although it appeared that the tower could be cranked up to a height of 55 feet, the applicant indicated that it would not exceed the 37 feet indicated which would be even with the maximum height of the proposed dwelling unit and only 7 feet in excess of the height of the garage behind which the tower would be located, also being sheltered by trees on the sides and back of the lot. Adjacent owners did appear and address the commission, expressing concern about the aesthetics of the neighborhood, electronic interference, and an adverse precedent. A petition was submitted, signed by 33 people from approximately 15 households. Covenants were discussed by the adjacent owners indicating that exterior towers were not allowed unless approved by the architectural control committee. Mr. Dick Winkler appeared as the owner and developer of the area.and indicated that a tower had been constructed in Park Cliff 1st Addition, which resulted in the drafting of covenants for the 2nd and 3rd Additions, which did not allow radio tower without the architectural committee approval. He did not indicate whether the architectural control committee would approve the proposed tower. Questions were also raised as to an apparent error in the Abstractor's list which resulted in many homeowners not having notice of this hearing. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to postpone the hearing to the next Planning Commission meeting to allow the applicant to meet with the owners in the area and for staff to review the issues thereto. All voted in favor. Dale Runkle then pointed out that if the tower is restricted to less than 37.5 feet, that it is not necessary to obtain a conditional use permit. Thus, the application could be withdrawn. 3 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 CARLSON ACRES - WAIVER OF PLAVLOT SPLIT - DAVID b DEBRA BAILEY Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Debra and David Bailey for a lot split of Lot 2, Carlson Acres, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 28, adjacent to Diffley Road and west of Pilot Knob Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application and indicated that the County had advised the City that a service drive for County Road #30 is anticipated in its construction plans for upgrading that road, which would mean that the driveway requested for the lot split would be merely an interim access. Mr. Harold Peterson of James R. Hill, appeared on behalf of the applicant and advised the Commission that he had a signed access permit from Dakota County and requested that the motion be scheduled for the November -6, 1985 council meeting, if possible. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to compliance with City Code. All voted in favor. It was indicated that the matter would be scheduled for the November 6, 1985 Council meeting, if acceptable to the Council and staff. All voted yea. BRITTANY FIRST ADDITION - TOLLEFSON BUILDER'S, INC. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Tollefson Builders, Inc. for extension of the conditional use permit for a temporary model home in Brittany 1st Addition, Lot 4,, Block 2, on Norwood Drive. Dale Runkle presented the application, indicating to the Commission that the present dwelling unit had been designated as a model home for five years. It appeared that Brittany 1st Addition was 94% completed and that the developer was requesting a six month extension in order to sell the property, and move his business. Mr. Rudolph appeared on behalf of the adjacent homeowners in Brittany Addition, indicating that the model home was constructed in 1980 as a parade home, with the builder representing to owners that as a parade home, the home would be sold in the near future. The surrounding owners complained that the home was not only a model home, but a construction office with construction crews, trucks and other vehicles constantly arriving, departing and parking at the location. It was the homeowner's position that the proposed use was a violation of the covenants put in place by Tollefson Builders, and that the lot next to the dwelling was being used entirely as a gravel parking lot. The owners expressed concern regarding small children in the area, due to the large amount of traffic, litter and presence of construction workers. There were complaints of lawn damage to surrounding homes, traffic and double parking problems, operation of the business beyond normal hours, and the parking of construction vehicles overnight and on weekends. There were also complaints about snow removal in the parking area burdensome to adjacent property owners. Mr. Wayne Bevers appeared on behalf of Tollefson Builders as the controller for Tollefson. He indicated the need for the temporary extension in order to comply with the needs of the neighborhood and to move the business. Chairman Hall pointed out that model homes are not the same as a construction office and that moving to another location will not suffice as a business and is not to be located in a model home under City Code. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to deny the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions and instructions: 4 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 1. That a construction office is not an allowed use for a residential home or model home. 2. That future model homes not be used as a construction office. 3. That the 'City enforce removal of the construction office by legal methods, if necessary. 4. That the adjacent parking area be corrected by enforcement of the zoning and subdivision ordinances along with the applicable development contract. All voted in favor. SLICER'S PIZZA RESTAURANT DRISCOLL MILLER INVESTMENTS, INC. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Hall convened the public hearing on the application of Driscoll Miller Investments, Inc. for a conditional use permit for on -sale wine and beer at Slicer's Pizza Restaurant, Lot 1, Block 2, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, located in that part of the southeast quarter of Section 30, at Nicola Road and Cliff Road. Dale Runkle presented the application, indicating that a conditional use was required in addition to a separate application for a beer and wine license, which was being processed simultaneously through the Police Department, City.Clerk and State. Review of the application indicated that it appeared to be a restaurant facility, as opposed to a bar. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion to approve the conditional use, subject to compliance with all City Code requirements. All voted in favor. TOWN CENTRE 70 - PRELIMINARY PLAT - DETAILED SITE PLAN REVIEW The Planning Commission next considered the detailed site plan for Town Centre 70 regarding the replatting of Outlot D and Lot 1, Town Centre 70 First Addition, providing for the construction of a 57,000 square foot Rainbow Food Store and 96,000 square foot shopping center. City Planner Dale Runkle presented the information, indicating that Planning Commission's action was a formality since there was lack of proper notice for public hearing. There was discussion regarding coverage, setbacks, parking spaces, and elevations. Mr. Runkle indicated that the proposal would still be subject to detailed landscaping and erosion control, drainage and grading and architectural plans. The developer indicated that they also wished to propose replatting of Outlots A and C. Trygg moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the proposal, subject to meeting all staff requirements and City Code provisions, including the following: 1. The applicant shall submit: 61 APC Minutes October 22, 1985 a. A detailed landscape plan. b. A detailed grading plan with berming. c. A lighting plan showing lumination areas. 2. The building shall be architecturally treated the same -on all sides. 3. A conditional use permit will be required for the proposed signage. 4. The applicant shall be responsible for installing a 6 inch watermain loop for fire protection. The location and layout shall be.approved by City staff. 5. The applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot utility easement over the watermain fire loop and hydrant Leads. 6. All applicable standard engineering conditionsshall apply. 7. The existing easements shall be vacated prior to final plat approval. 8. The applicant's proposal shall not exceed environmental assessment thresholds. All voted yes. NOVEMBER 12, 1985 - PD REVIEW Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to approve the agenda submitted by staff with the recommendation that the first portion dealing with PUD special review, not require over 10 minutes. All voted in favor. DECEMBER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to reschedule the December, 1985 meeting from December 24, to December 19, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. All voted yes. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion by Harrison, seconded Hall, the meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. All voted in favor. Secretary - APC 2 DGK