No preview available
 /
     
02/04/1986 - City Council RegularMai AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL FEBRUARY 4, 1986 6:30 P.N. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS �.� A. Fire Department t%iC. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department WD. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA ?56 A. Contractor Licenses ,Mt B. Personnel Items �,��C. Landfill Abatement - Joint Powers Agreement 101.1 C. Project 414, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing .(Pine Ridge Drive - Streets) �y.ISE. Project 428, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Cedarvale Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) 9,15 F. Project 437, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 4th Addition — Streets do Utilities) PmyI`G. Project 438, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Place South - Streets) T5 -PH. Project 454 Addendum, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Ashbury Road) Amusement Device License for Slicers Pizza f3.17J. Project 84A, Final Acceptance (Kensington Place - Utilities) %9K. Project 465, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Rahn Ridge - Trunk Storm Sewer) L. Project 469, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Towerview Road) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS y5AAA. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road (Streets - Beau de Rue to Kings Road) x•56 B. Public Hearing for Project 463, Cliff Road (Streets - T.H. 3 to Inver Grove.Heights) T5.1 9Q6C. Public Hearing for Project 461, Yankee Doodle Road (Streets - 35E to Lexington Avenue) e�•c�D. Public Hearing for Project 452, Beryl Road (Storm Sewer Outlet) \ E. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Lot 5, Block 1� 2, Brittany 7th Addition) \TA F. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Wilderness Run 5th Addition) A. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview �. Meadows Addition) PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) H. Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian Road) Note: Will be continued to February 18, 1986, City Council meeting) Continued Final Assessment Hearing - Miscellaneous Appeals 1 (Continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) VI. OLD BUSINESS Pa\�A. Park Consultant Appointment and Fee Schedule Consideration 7 B. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Airport Noise Committee (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) /3e C. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Economic Development Commission (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) Appointments to the Gun Club Lake Watershed -Management Commission (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) P/34 E. Sperry Proposal for New Marketing and Sales Facility j3L F. Reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit for Hong Wong Restaurant (Cedar Cliff Shopping Center) to Allow On -Sale Liquor License. G, On -Sale Liquor License for Hong Wong Restaurant - Cedar Cliff / Shopping Center 7 /5p H. Conditional Use Permit for Hardees Restaurant for a Drive - -Through Restaurant Facility and a Pylon Sign (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting), Lot 1, Block 1, First Minnehaha Addition Variance for a Two (2) Foot Sideyard Setback (Continued from 1 January 21, 1986, meeting) - Wesley Construction, Lot 3, Block 2, Sun Cliff 5th Addition VII. NEW BUSINESS PAZ- A. Fiscal 1985, Budgetary Adjustment /63 B. Preliminary Plat for a Single Family Home in Highview Acres (Remick Addition - Mark Remick) Located in Part of the Of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 4, North of Highview Park and West of Pilot Knob Road �•/)L C. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single Family Lots on 40 Acres and a Rezoning from A. (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) - Greensboro/Dave Gabbert, Located in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14,, North of Wescott Road and West of Lexington Avenue -p.19 6 D. Waiver of Plat (Pietsch Construction) Duplex Lot Split, Lot 7, II Block 1, Sun Cliff let Addition, NW 1/4 of Section 29 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1q& A. Review of League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies P/93 B. Review/Approve Special Assessment Committee Recommendation z/0 C. Contract 86-3, Approve Plans Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Ashbury Road) IR. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persona not on the agenda) e,. E. ADJOURNMENT. • • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two There are twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSE A. Contractor License --Attached on page is a list of con- tractors who are renewing or who have bee selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: contractor licenses as presented. I To approve the list of FOR MONTH OF December 198 TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 1,520. Training 405 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 130 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 15 Administrative 399 Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating • On Leave Rookies TOTAL FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other 2,589 STATION #1 1 8 15 2 0 0 26 NUMBER 22 DATE. NAME LOCATION 0 2 7 5 0 36 12-26-85 Brown Tank 2875 Hwv 55 12-26-85 4130 Rahn Rd, #220 12-23-85 871 Wescott 12-20-85 540 Ctv Rd 30 12-14-85 Warren Esutis 720 O'Neal Drive 12-3-85 Barrell Recond.Mike Collins Drive STATION #2 11 3 15 3 0 0 22 $ LOSS $174,250 $174,250 LOX K Industry Apartment Farm (barn) House Commercial Industry STATION #3 10 2 0 0 17 $ LOSS $2,000 2,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 30,000 EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPAR7T-EENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF November 1985 • WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 630 Training 453 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 144 Station Maintenance 132 Fire Prevention 25 Administrative 234 TOTAL 1,618 W� MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 Chiefs 1 1 1 Available Days 8 4 4 Available Nights 15 15 10 Available Rotating 2 2 2 On Leave 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rookies TOTAL 26 22 17 FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LASS Structure 9 8,500 Grass 1 Vehicle 4 4,000 False 3 Medical 7 Other 1 TOTAL 25 12,500 ® DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 11/23/85 Yankee Std. 31 & 28 Commercial 8,000 11-11-85 Cedar & 30 Car 4,000 15 'l® 24D, .� .. FOR MOMg OF October 1985 ii= PP3Z DWED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 4 9 0 ,rte 381 Truck i F)quipnent Maintenance 14 4 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 133 Administrative 419 TOTAL' 1,687 KNNPOWER Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating on heave Rookies FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other LARGE DOIdAR LOSSES DATE NAME 10-13-85 STATION #1 1 8 15 2 0 0 26 NUMBER 2 2 3 5 3 3 18 13 && Seneca STATION #2 1 4 15 2 0 0 22 $ LCSS :.150 4,500 $4,650 OCCUPANCY` Car CCS STATION #3 1 . 4 10 2 0 0 17 $ LOSS $4,000 EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE,DEPAFTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF September 1985 ® WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 580 Training 422 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 149 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 22 Administrative 306 TOTAL MANPOWER Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave ® Rookies TOTAL paq-.42FA- 110 Structure Structure Grass vehicle False Medical Other TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME ® - none - 1,599 STATION #1 1 9 12 2 3 0 27 3 0 1 9 10 1 24 LOCATION C STATION #2 1 5 14 2 1 0 23 $ LOSS 0 OCCUPANCY" STATION #3 1 4 10 3 0 0 HU $ LCSS CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 1. B-E CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2. COLLEGE CITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3. CREATIVE ENERGY HOMES, INC. 4. KIN'S': CONSTRUCTION 5. MCAPPEL, INC. 6. TIMBERLINE BUILDERS HEATING/VENTILATING: 1. CENTRAIRE, INC. 02. DOODY, INC. 3. HARRIS WAIDINGER CORP. 4. EDWARD T. KOLAR & CO., INC. 5. LARSON-MAC COMPANY, INC. 6. LOOP BELDEN PORTER, INC. 7. MINNESOTA MECHANICAL, INC. 8. SNELLING MECHANICAL, INC. 0 7 WATER SOFTENER: 1. SURGE WATER CONDITIONING PLUMBING: 1. BRUCKMUELLER PLUMBING 2. DOODY, INC. 3. FARMINGTON PLBG & HTG. 4. HILTNER PLUMBING 5. D.R. MC DERMOTT PLUMBING 6. MINNESOTA MECHANICAL, INC. 7. JIM MURR PLUMBING & HEATING 8. NICKELSON PLBG & HTG., INC. 9. OLBERG CONSTRUCTION 10. PJ PLUMBING & HEATING 11. PROTECT PLUMBING 12. STANT PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. 13. SWANSON PLUMBING &.HEATING, INC. C Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three PERSONNEL ITEMS B. PERSONNEL ITEMS' There are nine ( 9) personnel items to be given consideration: 1. Consulting Inspector --The City has been retaining Mr. Elmer Borgschatz as a part-time Sign Inspector since November 1984. Mr. Borgschatz has surveyed and inventoried all signs within the community and was instrumental in the establishment of an administrative policy for the sign inventory. Mr. Borgschatz was employed during 1985 as a MEED employee which essentially means there was a reimbursement paid to the City for his rate of compensation. Dollars were budgeted for 1986 under Consulting Inspectors so that Mr. Borgschatz would now become a consultant to the City on a part-time basis. He will serve during 1986 at a rate of $5.00 per hour and work no greater than 1,040 hours. Mr. Borgschatz will provide his own transportation and be paid mileage at the current City mileage rate. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the hiring of Elmer Borgschatz as a Consulting Sign Inspector for 1986. Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four 2. Engineering/Planning Secretary --After screening the approx- imately 30 applications for this position, seven finalists were given typing and secretarial tests. The seven finalists were also interviewed by Director of Public Works Colbert and Admini- strative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Judy Jenkins be appointed to fill the vacancy. Her official starting date in this position would be February 3, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Judy Jenkins as Engineering/Planning Secretary, the appointment to be effective February 3, 1986. 3. Building Inspector (General) --After screening the approximately 20 applications for this position, four finalists were interviewed by Chief Building Official Peterson, Assistant Building Official Reid and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommenda- tion that William Bruestle be appointed to fill this newly -created position. The appointment would be contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement and would be effective February 3, 1986. 04 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment • of William Bruestle as Building Inspector, the appointment to be effective February 3, 1986, and contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 4. Plumbing Inspector --Four applications were received for this fairly -specialized position, only two of which could meet minimum qualifications. Those two applicants were interviewed by Chief Building Official Peterson, Assistant Building Official Reid and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommenda- tion Dirk House be appointed to fill this newly -created position. The appointment would be contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement and would be effective February 3, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Dirk House as Plumbing Inspector, the appointment to be effec- tive February 3, 1986, and contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 5. Clerk -Typist (Pool) --Two positions are currently vacant in the typing pool. These include one, six -hour position and one, four-hour position. Seven applications were received and six applicants were given typing tests, communications and office procedures tests and were interviewed by Administrative Secretary Finnegan and Administrative 'Assistant Duffy. It is their recom- mendation that Liz Cain be appointed to fill the six -hour, vacant position. Her official starting date would be February 5, 1986, and would be contingent upon the successful completion of _the City's physical examination requirement. • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five 5. Clerk -Typist - Pool (Continued') --It is also their recommenda- tion that Nancy Graves be appointed to fill the four-hour, vacant position. Her official starting date would be February 19, 198'6, and would also be contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To, approve the appointments of Liz Cain to the six -hour, clerk -typist position and Nancy Graves to the four-hour, clerk -typist position, effective February 5 and February 19, respectively, and contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 6. Street Supervisor --After screening the 23 applications for this newly -created position, seven applicants were interviewed by Director of Public Works Colbert, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart, and Administrative Assistant Duffy. From the seven, three finalists were chosen. Those three finalists were interviewed by Director of Public Works Colbert, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart and by two Public Works profes- sionals from other municipalities. It is their recommendation that Lance Lundsten be appointed to fill this newly -created position. His official starting date in this new position would be February 5, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Lance Lundsten as Street 'Supervisor, the appointment to be effective February 5, 1986. 7. Road Maintenance Worker --Since the appointment of Lance Lundsten as Street Supervisor creates a vacancy in the Road Maintenance Division for a Road Maintenance Worker, it will be necessary to advertise this vacancy. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ment of the Road Maintenance of this vacant position.' ITEM: To authorize the advertise - Worker position and the filling 8. Clerk -Typist (Parks/Building Inspection) --The City has received a notice -of resignation from Nancy Bryant, the current four-hour cierk-typist for Parks/Protective Inspections. Ms. Bryant submit- ted a two-week notice; her last day of employment with the City of Eagan will be January 31. -The Parks Department was authorized for a new, four-hour, clerk -typist position effective in 19'86. Authorization is needed, therefore, to advertise for an eight-hour clerk -typist for the Parks & Protective Inspections Departments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON .THIS ITEM: To authorize the advertise- ment for an eight-hour, Clerk -typist for the Parks & Protective Inspections Departments. Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six 9. Parks & Recreation Intern --The City has received a letter of resignation from the current Parks & Recreation Intern, Scott Mongan, effective January 29, 1986. Mr. Morgan has secured a permanent position in the parks & recreation management field in California. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To accept the resignation of Parks & Recreation Intern Scott Morgan, effective January 29, 1986. • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven E • LANDFILL ABATEMENT/JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT C. Landfill Abatement/Joint Powers Agreement --During 1985 a City Council decision was made to expand the pilot program for compost material by purchasing a portable wood chipper and providing manpower for the compost site directly south of the Municipal Center Building. The City also held a clean-up day at which time residents were encouraged to bring recyclables to this location. The total cost of the portable wood chipper was $10,300 along with all other expenses, including materials for promotion of the City's recycling, recapture of in house personnel expenses and other related costs, the total expenditure was $17,328. The City expects to receive $5,264 as a grant from the Metropolitan Council and $10,528 through the Household Rebate Program through Dakota County. The Joint Powers Agreement is a 10 page document which the City must execute in order to qualify for the $1 per household that is available to municipalities within Dakota County. The Agreement allows Dakota County to impose a tipping fee or surcharge on operators of facilities for mixed municipal solid waste. The fee in the metropolitan area cannot exceed $.25 per cubic yard. Dakota County has agreed that they would initiate this surcharge and therefore have created a fund called the Landfill Abatement Fund that allows for municipalities to apply for assistance to help fund any recycling programs not to exceed $1 per household as mentioned. If any member of the City Council would like to review the Agreement in more detail a copy would be made available and be sent out with the Administrative Packet. Enclosed on pages 3 through ]t is a cost breakdown of the in house and out-of-pocket expenses for the Landfill Abatement Program. The Joint. Powers Agreement between Dakota County and the City has been discussed on two (2) previous occasions by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a final draft of the Joint Powers Agreement between Dakota County and the City of Eagan. It provides language to deal with the Landfill Abatement Funding assistance. /z CITY OF EAGAN -1985 LANDFILL ABATEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES 1. Personnel (Program 4370) a. Planning & Administration John Hohenstein - 56.5 hrs. x $9.50/hr. _ $ 536.75 Scott Morgan - 207.5 hrs. x $6.00/hr. _ $1,245.00 SUBTOTAL: $1,781.75 B. Maintenance /3. Tom Schuster - 8 hrs. x $11.56/hr. _ $ 92.48 Don Buecksler - 6 hrs. x $11.11/hr. = 66.66 Steve Taylor - 2 hrs. x $11.56/hr. _ $ 23.12 SUBTOTAL: $ 182.26 C. Site Monitor Sharon McNeely 60 hrs. x $ 4.50/hr. _ $ 270.00 William Reid 49 hrs. x $ 4.50/hr. _ $ 220.50 SUBTOTAL: $ 490.50 TOTAL PERSONNEL: $2,454.51 • 2. Site Development a. Grading site - Acct. 401-4385-394-32 Mies Excavating - 1st payment = $ 538.50 2nd payment = $3,051.50 TOTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT: $3,590.00 3. Equipment a. Portable wood chipper - Acct. 1101-4580-.394-32 $10,300.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT: $10,300.00 4. Materials a. Compost center signs - Acct. 1101-4236-394-32 Earl F. Anderson $ 661.32 b. Postage for recycling survey - Acct. 401-4321-030-02 Postmaster - $ 100.00 . Postmaster - .-$ 15.00 SUBTOTAL: $ 115.00 c. Kerosene heater for center shelter bldg. Warners Hardware - $ 6:1.86 td. Tarps used to transport leaves - Acct. 401-4220-394-32 Northern Hydraulics - 14.90 /3. e. Site supplies - Acct. 1101-4210-370-32 • Hardware Hank (racks, trash bags, flashlight) October - $ 10.54 November - $ 19.90 SUBTOTAL: $ 30.44 TOTAL MATERIALS: n LJ .• 5. Other - Acct. a. Cleanup day Beerman Services - Acct. 1101-4430-394-32 b. Conference University of MN - Acct. 1101-4411-030-02 TOTAL OTHER: TOTAL DOCUMENTED E%PEDITU PROJECTED REVENUE (GRANTS) 1) Metropolitan Council Household Rebate Program $ 5,264.00 2) Dakota County Household Rebate Program 10,528.00 TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE: $ 883.52 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $17,328.03 $15,792.00 • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Eight Memo Ci'ty Council Meeting PROJECT 414, FINAL ASSMT. ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/PINE RIDGE DRIVE D. Project 414, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Pine Ridge Drive - Streets) --Construction has been completed, fin,il costs tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared for the street reconstruction of Pine Ridge Drive in the Timberline Addition under Project 414. It is recom- mended that this final assessment roll be received and that a public hearing be scheduled for March 4, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 414 (Pine Ridge Drive - Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on March 4, 1986. PROJECT 42'8, FINAL ASSMT. ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/CEDARVALE INDUSTRIAL PK E. Project 428, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Cedarvale Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) --Construction • on this major trunk storm sewer facility through the Cedarvale Industrial Park is approximately 90% complete. Due to the fact that all assessments associated with this project ,are for trunk area at predetermined rates, it is appropriate to proceed with the final assessment hearing. Therefore, it is recommended that this final assessment roll be received and that a public hearing be scheduled for March 4, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 428 (Cedarvale Industrial Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) and order the final assessment hearing to be held March 4, 1986. PROJECT 437, FINAL ASSMT. ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/WINDTREE 4TH ADDN. F. Project 437, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 4th Addition - Streets & Utilities) --All construc- tion has been completed, final costs .tabulated and the final assessment -rolls prepared for the installation of streets and utilities servicing the Windtree 4th Addition. Therefore, it is recommended that these assessment rolls be received and that a public hearing -be scheduled for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To .receive the final assessment roll for Project 437 (.Windtree 4th Addition - Streets • & .-Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held on March 4, 1986: /6' Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine PROJECT 438, FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/LEXINGTON PLACE S G. Project 438, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Place South - Streets) --All construction has been completed, final costs tabulated and the final assessment rolls prepared for the installation of streets within the Lexington Place South Addition (Project 438). Therefore, it is appropriate that these assessment rolls be received and that the final assess- ment hearing be scheduled for March 4, 1986, for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 438 (Lexington Place South - Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on March 4, 1986. PROJECT 454 ADDENDUM, RECEIVE REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/ASHBURY RD H. Project 454 Addendum, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Ashbury Road) --On December 3, 1985, the public hearing was held to discuss the installation of streets and utilities within Ashbury Drive from the Blackhawk Glen Addition through the Blue Cross property to Blue Cross Drive. Subsequent to that public hearing and project approval, further analysis of the project has resulted in required revisions or additions to that project resulting in changing the preliminary assessment roll presented at that public hearing. Therefore, staff has prepared an addendum to that report identifying these changes/additions and is recommend- ing that a new public hearing be held to protect the city's ability to assess these additional costs as a part of this project. Some of the changes relate to both controlled water and flood elevations for the various ponds to be interconnected by the storm sewer system. The additions pertain to a continuation of the sidewalk from the Blackhawk Glen Addition to Blue Cross Road under this project. Also, the developers of the Blackhawk Glen Addition and Blue Cross/Blue Shield have reached an agreement whereby the excavation and placement of some of the fillwill be to the advantage of one landowner thereby reducing the cost to the other. All these issues will be discussed in detail in the addendum to the feasibility report which will be reviewed at the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the addendum report for Project 454 and order a public hearing to be held on March 4, 1986. A4 • • • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Ten Memo City Council Meeting AMUSEMENT DEVICE/SLICER•''S PIZZERIA I. Advance Carter for Amusement Device for Two Machines at Slicer's Pizzeria --Norman Pink representing Advance Carter Company has made application for two (2) amusement device licenses at Slicer's Restaurant. The two machines are Ms_ Pacman and Pole Position. Mr. Pink's application is in order for consideration. y ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amusement device license for ,Norman Pink representing Advance Carter Company for the Slicer's Restaurant at 2113 Cliff Road. 0 PROJECT 84A, FINAL ACCEPTANCE/KENSINGTON PLACE J. Project 84A, Final Acceptance (Kensington Place - Utilities) - The utilities necessary to service the Kensington P1ace.Addn. have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department and our consulting engineering firm and found to be in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. Subsequently, the staff is recommending that these utilities be formally accepted by the City for, perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final acceptance of utilities installed under Project 84A, Kensington Place, for perpetual maintenance by the City. Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Eleven Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 46'5/FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/KAHN RIDGE K_ Project 465, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Rahn Ridge - Trunk Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition received from the developers of the Rahn Ridge Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council. for consideration of scheduling a public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the feasibility report for Project 465 (Rahn Ridge - Trunk Storm Sewer) and order the public hearing to be held March 4, 1986. PROJECT 469/PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/TOWERVIEW RD L. Project 469, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Tower - view Road - Streets) --We have received a petition from the de- velopers of the LeMay Lake Hills (Martin Shields) requesting the upgrading of Towerview Road from Quarry Lane to Pilot Knob Road. As the Council may recall, the upgrading of Towerview Road was a condition of the preliminary plat ,approval for the LeMay Lake Hills Addition which was considered by the City Council on September 17, 1985. All costs associated with the preparation of this report have been guaranteed by the developer in case the project is not approved at the time of the public hearing. • LJ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 469 (Towerview Road - Streets). 19 • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 19186, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 460/NICOLS ROAD (STREETS) A. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road '(Streets - Beau de Rue to Kings Road) --In response to the rapidly deteriorating condition of Nicols Road and the pending turnback of this county road to the City of Eagan, Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on January 7, 1986, in consideration of scheduling a public hearing to be held on February 4. A copy of the feasibility report is enclosed on pagesc,�through-SS .Because this project will affect all property owners adjacent to this roadway either through proposed assessments, easement acquisition or construction inconvenience, a special neighborhood meeting was held at City Hall on January 29th. Nineteen individuals attended this informa- tional meeting and expressed concerns pertaining to the following items: a. Location and/or need for the proposed 8' bituminous trail along the east side. b. The need for a four -lane roadway between Cliff and Diffley Roads. C. The proposed assessments. d. The negative impact of future commercial development and related increased traffic volumes. As a result of this informational meeting, it was also discovered that several property owners were inadvertently omitted from the proposed assessment roll and/or public hearing notification list. Therefore, in order to protect the City's ability to assess the benefited property owners, it will be required to continue this public hearing to allow a revised pending assessment roll and new public hearing notifications to be processed. However, those property owners that have been affected by these omissions have been so informed and encouraged to attend the February 4th public hearing. Therefore„ the continua -tion should only be a formality before formal action is taken on this project. The Assistant City Engineer, who was instrumental in the prepara= tion of this feasibility report,' will be conducting the public hearing. The Public Works Director will also be available to answer any questions and concerns that arise from this public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive comments and continue the public hearing for Project 460 (Nicols Road - Streets from Beau De Rue -Drive to Kings Road) to February 18, 1986. • `� CITY OF EAGAN /If PUBIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V\ ENGINEERING DIVISION I I Mf RESORT Ll NIC0�5 ROCU STREET IIiPROfE�BVTS Approved by-� Viihl�iir Works Department/Date Council Approval: 0 Date ®F aaga 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONES (612) 454-8100 JANUARY 7, 1986 HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN MN 55121 Re: Nicols Road Street Improvements Pro3ect No. 460 Dear Mayor and Council: BEA BLOMOUIST Morar THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Admimllator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On. August 20, 1985 Council directed the Public Works Engineering Division to study the feasibility of upgrading Nicols Road to city standards for a 9 ton collector street. The Engineering Division analyzed the existing conditions and future needs of Nicols Road to determine the proposed improvements necessary to bring it to city standards. This report presents the results of the analysis and recommends the improvement of Nicols Road at an estimated cost of $1,178,816.00. The following report includes discussion of Nicols Road's existing conditions and proposed improvements, necessary easements/permits, assessment and construction areas, financing, detailed cost estimates, preliminary assessment roll and estimated project schedule. I will be present at the February 4, 1986 public hearing to explain this project and answer any questions the Council or public may have. Si�Y, Richard M. H ti Assistant City Engineer RMH:jh I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Sta of Minnesot Richard M. He DATE: January 7. 1986 'Reg. No -14973 THE LONE OAK TREE. _ .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY • PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS FEASIBILITY REPORT PURPOSE The purpose of this feasibility report for Project 460 is to investigate the upgrading of Nicols Road to City standards. The City Council authorized preparation of this feasibility report on August 20, 1985, and assigned its preparation to the Public Works Engineering Division. SCOPE The scope of Project 460 is to upgrade Nicols Road to City collector street standards. The limits of this project are from Kings Road to Beau D' Rue Drive. This report discusses existing conditions of Nicols Road, proposed feasible improvements, easement acquisition, assessment and construction ® areas, methods of financing and contains .a preliminary assessment roll. EXISTING CONDITIONS Nicols Road, previously known as Old Cedar Avenue, is presently a two-lane rural road under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Dakota County is planning to turn back Nicols Road to the City's jurisdiction in 1986. The Master Thoroughfare Plan identifies Nicols Road as a community collector street from Cliff Road to Beau De Rue Drive and a neighborhood collector street fr6m Kings Road to Cliff Road. In order to better determine the upgrading of Nicols Road, the City must first examine its existing conditions. The following discusses the existing roadway section, traffic, utilities and land uses. 1. Roadway Section: The rural roadway section consists of a 24' wide ® bituminous surface, gravel shoulders and ditch drainage. According to Dakota County, they graded Nicols Road in 1935 and surfaced it in 1942. They have -no ® record as to when Nicols Road was overlaid, however, they estimate it was around 1962. Clearly, severe map and alligator cracking along the entire length of this project indicates the pavement life has been exceeded. An existing 20' wide bituminous surface frontage road abuts the east side of Nicols Road between Shale Lane and Marble Lane. Soil borings taken indicate areas of poor subsoil. The majority of poor subsoil lies between Diffley Road and Beau De Rue Drive. The borings also indicate isolated pockets of poor subsoil between Cliff Road and Diffley Road at low spots. 2. Traffic: The 1983 average traffic volumes of vehicles per day for each major section of Nicols Road are: Kings Road to Cliff Road - 1,250 Cliff Road to Diffley Road - 2,500 Diffley Road to Beau D' Rue Drive - 4,100 Signalized intersections exist at Cliff Road and Diffley Road. The Dakota County Highway Department is responsible for operation of these signals. 3. Utilities: The 16" water main along the west side of Nicols Road is 45' west of centerline. This will be outside the future street surface. Also, the water main was buried to suit future design grades for Nicols Road. The sanitary sewer and storm sewer locations are outside the future street surface. 4. Land Use: About 82% of the land abutting Nicols Road is either MnDOT right-of-way or platted. Of the platted areas, the following remain to be developed: • a3 ® 24 Ac. -Mari Acres 2nd Addition, except Lot 3, Block 1 10 Ac. -Lot 19, Block 8, Cedar Grove No. 2 7 Ac. -Cedar Ridge 2nd Addition and Lot 2, Block 1, of the 1st Addition 4 Ac. -Outlot A of Peaceful Heights Addition All of these areas are zoned for commercial use. The zoning or guide use for the remaining 18% of undeveloped area is split about evenly between R-1 and commercial. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Due to Nicols Road present deteriorated condition and large existing traffic volumes, the Engineering Division recommends reconstruction of Nicols Road to 9 -ton standards to suit future projected traffic volumes, estimated between 8,000 and 16,000 vehicles per day. The reconstruction of Nicols Road to ® collector street standards will include:. 1. 32'-52' wide bituminous 9 -ton urban street section with concrete curb and gutter. 2. 8' bituminous trail along east side. 3. Storm sewer laterals. 4. Traffic signal modifications. 5. Beau De Rue Drive and Nicols Road intersection realignment. 6. Miscellaneous utility modifications. 7. Detour. 1. Typical Street Section: The Engineering Division recommends the following various street widths to handle existing and anticipated future traffic: a. 52' - from Cliff Road to about 600' north of Diffley Road b. 48' - from Cliff Road to about 900' south of Cliff Road ® c. 44' - Nancy Circle to about 900' south of Cliff Road - about 600' north of Diffley Road to Beau De Rue Drive d. 32' - from about Kings Road to Nancy Circle p2 (a) The 52' width is the minimum State Aid standard for 4 traffic lanes. The two traffic lanes in each direction will allow vehicles to make both left and right turns without greatly affecting through traffic. Staff believes most of the traffic and turning movements will occur between Cliff Road and Diffley Road. Staff recommends extending this width about 600' north of Diffley Road to provide adequate distance for north bound traffic to merge to the two-lane 44' width. This will also provide adequate distance for traffic to diverge in two lanes for left and right turning movements at the Diffley Road intersection. Staff does not feel that continuing the 52' width to Beau De Rue Drive is necessary because: -limited turning movements due to: ® o limited commercial property requiring future accesses o only two "T" street intersection - 52' width not suited for parallel parking (b) Staff recommends a 48' width section south of Cliff Road for about 9001. This will provide for four traffic lanes past the commercially zoned property along Nicols Road. Staff feels this width is adequate for this section of street for the following reasons: - Lesser traffic volumes than north of Cliff Road - Short length - Non -State Aid classification (c) Staff recommends the 44' width section from where the 48' width section ends to Nancy Circle and from about 600' north of Diffley Road to Beau De ® Rue Drive. This section will provide for 2 traffic lanes with paral-lel a5' LI parking along both sides. The parking ,lanes can double as right-hand ® turn lanes and for emergency stopping or disabled vehicles. This will also assist in the transition to a 32' street on the south end and a 24' rural section street on the north end. (d) The 32' width section from Nancy Circle to Kings Road will be adequate considering the residential nature of the area and lower traffic volumes. The typical pavement section based on existing subsoils with an R value of 30 and projected traffic volumes will be: 1-1/2" 2341 Bituminous Wear Course 1-1/2" 2331 Bituminous Binder Course 1-1/2" 2331 Bituminous Base Course 8 " Class 5 Aggregate Base Course ® Because some areas along Nicols Road have poor subsoils, some subgrade correction will be necessary. This will require either excavation of the poor subsoils and backfilling with good aggregate materials or use of soil stabilization materials such as geotextile fabrics. Excavation and backfilling methods will be assumed for this report. Staff will determine the most cost effective alternative during detailed design. 2. Bituminous Trail: City standards for collector streets require the - installation of an 8' trailway. The logical location for this trailway is along the east side of Nicols Road. The Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition already constructed a portion of this trail under Project 415. The trailway construction will consist of a 2" bituminous. surface over a 4" aggregate base. 3. Storm Sever Laterals: Trunk storm sewers are in place along Nicols Road. However, the upgrading to an urban street section will require the installation of several catch basins and storm sewer leads to connect to the trunk lines. This construction will eliminate �&the unsightly east ditch south • of Beau De Rue Drive. 4. Traffic Signal Modifications: This project will require adding loop detectors and possibly making some adjustments to critical handhole boxes. Staff does not anticipate having to relocate any signal poles. Dakota County will provide design assistance for any signal modifications. 5. Beau De Rue Intersection Realignment: This project provides the City with the opportunity to realign the Beau De Rue Drive intersection with Nicols Road. The current alignment makes right turns from Nicola Road into the proper lane on Beau De Rue Drive very difficult for small vehicles and impossible for large trucks and semi -trailers. Staff recommends increasing the radius for the right turns onto Beau De Rue Drive to solve the existing turning problem. ® 6. Miscellaneous Utility Modifications: This project also provides the opportunity for the City to make some minor utility modifications. Some of the modifications would include: 1) Install separate 1" water services to 4 existing homes presently being served by a single 3/4" line, Lots 8-11, Cedar Grove No. 1. 2) Install a manhole at the end of a sewer line near Lot 11, Cedar Grove No.. 1. 3) Relocate hydrants along the old frontage road between Co. Rd. 30 and Carnelian Lane. 4) Stub 1-1/2" water service to parcel 060-04. 5) Stub 6" water service to Rahn Park and between parcels 030-04 and 050-04. i7. Detours: This project necessitates the closing of various portions -of Nicols Road to through traffic to facilitate street construction. Because Nicols Road provides the only access to the area south of Cliff Road, the �7 ® contractor will have to maintain access at all times to the businesses and residences. However, the Rahn Ridge Addition will provide access to Vienna Woods from the east. The streets within this new subdivision will be open to traffic by July 15, 1986. The City can close the section of Nicols Road between Cliff Road and Beau D' Rue Drive and provide a detour route using the Cedar Avenue Freeway and Rahn Road. Staff recommends not closing the section between Cedar Ridge Circle and Cliff Road until July 1 because the owner of Jerry's Nursery expressed concerns to staff that the month of May and June are crucial to his business. Staff will require the contractor to maintain local access. The City will need to acquire some additional permanent highway easements and 7 some temporary construction easements_ from the following parcels: ® PERMANENT EASEMENTS TEMPORARY EASEMENTS Section 31 Cedar Cliff Addition 030-04 0.02 AC Blk 1, Lt 1 0.05 AC 050-04 0.02 AC Blk 6, Lt 6 0.05 AC 060-04 0.02 AC Section 19 Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition 010-12 0.01 AC Blk 1, Lt 1 0.04 AC Blk 1, Lt 2 0.05 AC Blk 1, Lt 3 0.09 AC Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 0.04 AC Section 30 • 010-29 0.12 AC Dakota County may require permits for work within their right-of-way at p. Diffley Road and Cliff Road intersections. 7 U 0 Also, staff anticipates requiring a DNR permit to place fill along portions of the east side of Pond AP -9 (DNR Protected Wetland #158W). Preliminary estimates are that the widening of Nicols Road will require filling approximately 0.2 AC of this DNR designated water. This minimal filling will not adversely affect any of the hydraulic characteristics of this pond. ASSESSMENT AREA a CG e — Section 19 e Cedar Grove #3 e e Blk 8, Lts 1-4 e Cedar Grove #1 e e Blk 2, Lt 12 e e e e 011-54 e e 011-55 e Peaceful 010-29 i AREA ONLY Cedar Grove #3 Blk 1, Lt 1 Cedar Grove #1 Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Blk 2, Lts 1-11 Cedar Grove #2 Blk 8, Lt 18 Cedar Grove #4 Blk 6, Lts 1-11 & 17 Blk 7, Lt 17 Cedar C1iff.Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 6, Lt 1 Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Blk 2, Lts 1-3- �� Section 30 e Cedar Grove #2 e e 190-08 & 191-08 e e Cedar Grove #4 e e Blk 6, 12-16 e 1 011-25 e e 020-25 e e 030-25 e e 011-27 e e Heights Addition e e Outlot A e e Blk 1, Lt 1 e e e Peaceful 010-29 i AREA ONLY Cedar Grove #3 Blk 1, Lt 1 Cedar Grove #1 Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Blk 2, Lts 1-11 Cedar Grove #2 Blk 8, Lt 18 Cedar Grove #4 Blk 6, Lts 1-11 & 17 Blk 7, Lt 17 Cedar C1iff.Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 6, Lt 1 Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Blk 2, Lts 1-3- �� U ASSESSMENT AREA Cedar Ridge 1st Addition Blk 1, Lts 1 & 3 Blk 2, Lt 1 Mari Acres Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Mari Acres 2nd Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 3, Lts 1 & 2 012-76 (Rahn Park) Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 2, Lt 1 CONSTRUCTION AREA ONLY 30 Section 31 Flour Bin International 1st Tousignants Addition 1 Addition Blk 1, Us 1 & 6 1 Blk 1, Lt 1 010-06 _ 1 030-04 050-04 060-04 1 020-06 e 0 Durning's Subdivision 1 Lt 1 & 2 :Cedarviewj Addition Blk 1, Lt 1-3 30 ® FINANCING Staff estimates this project will cost $1,178,816. Appendix A contains a detailed breakdown of the estimated costs. This figure includes 5% contingency and 25% overhead for administration and legal expenses. This does not include any costs for easement acquisition. The funding to finance the estimated project cost will come from the following sources: 1) Special Assessments. 2) County Turn Back Funds. 3) Municipal State -Aid Funds. 4) Major Street Fund. property's zoning and use. The different rates estimated for this project are: 1) Commercial/Multiple. . . . . . . . $78.45/ff 2) Full Residential . . . . . . . . $33.75/ff 3) Half Residential . . . . . . . . . $16.88/ff Based on these rates, staff estimates revenues of $746,927. Appendix,B contains a preliminary assessment roll identifying the benefitted property and listing proposed assessments. 1. Commercial/Multiple Rate: This rate proposes to include all street construction costs to build a 44-52' 9 -ton urban street, 50% of the grading, and the 8' trailway. The retaining wall construction cost is assigned to be part of the grading costs. Staff proposes assessing this rate to school; commercial; .limited, neighborhood, or general business; and multiple zoning classifications. 3 / Special Assessments: Staff proposes to assess benefitted properties adjacent ® Nicols Road in accordance with City policy at a front foot rate based upon the property's zoning and use. The different rates estimated for this project are: 1) Commercial/Multiple. . . . . . . . $78.45/ff 2) Full Residential . . . . . . . . $33.75/ff 3) Half Residential . . . . . . . . . $16.88/ff Based on these rates, staff estimates revenues of $746,927. Appendix,B contains a preliminary assessment roll identifying the benefitted property and listing proposed assessments. 1. Commercial/Multiple Rate: This rate proposes to include all street construction costs to build a 44-52' 9 -ton urban street, 50% of the grading, and the 8' trailway. The retaining wall construction cost is assigned to be part of the grading costs. Staff proposes assessing this rate to school; commercial; .limited, neighborhood, or general business; and multiple zoning classifications. 3 / ® 2. Full Residential Rate: This rate proposes to include construction costs for a typical 32' residential street and 25% of the grading. Staff proposes assessing this rate to church and park zoning. 3. Half Residential Rate: Staff proposes using this rate for existing single family or agricultural zoned property obtaining direct driveway access to Nicols Road. The Council should determine the length of time for spreading the assessments at the time of the public hearing. City policy for establishing the interest rate is based upon the interest rate paid by the City from the sale of the general obligation bonds necessary to finance these improvements. Frontage Road Equivalent: The City originally designated this rate under ® Project 306 with the Diffley Road reconstruction. This rate pooled all lots taking access from the Diffley Road frontage roads together with those lots from Project 342, Cedar Grove 1 & 2 Street Reconstruction, to establish a per lot assessment. Residents along Nicols Road, between Diffley Road and Carnelian Lane, were included because they petitioned for removal of, that frontage road and extension of their driveways to Nicols Road. Because of that previous assessment, the City will not be assessing them under this project. The City proposes no new improvements to the frontage road along Cedar Grove No. 2 & 4 Additions under this project. Because Cedar Grove 2 & 4 Additions do not have direct access to Nicols Road, the City will not be assessing those residential properties under this project. ® County Turn Back Funds: The turn back procedure requires Dakota County to place a 2" overlay on Nicols Road (Co. Rd. 23) prior to turning it over to the City. Rather than do this and then tear up all the bituminous with this - 3� APPENDIX A NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION Remove Concrete Curbing Salv Pipe Culvert Salv CB Castings Common Excavation Topsoil Borrow, CV Salv Topsoil to Stkpile Salv Topsoil from Stkpile Core Excavation Aggregate Backfill Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 Bit Matl for Mix Base Course Mixture Bit Matl for Mix Wear Course Mix Bit Matl for Tack Coat 12" RCP 15" RCP 18" RCP 21" RCP 24" RCP Install 12" FES Install 18" FES Const CB, Des G . Reconst CB -Adjust Frame & Ring Cast Random Riprap, C1 I Geotextile Filter 2" Bit Walk (Trailway) Aggregate Base Placed, C1 Conc C & G, Des B618 Roadside Seeding Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 Sodding ...Connect to Ex MH/CB Standard San. MH (0-8) 6" DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 Relocate Hydrant Adjust Hydrant Adjust Valve Box, Water Timber Retaining Wall ,Timber Tieback units Steel Screw Anchors Signal Modifications • SUBTOTAL - PARTICIPATING EST'D QUANTITY UNIT 100 LF 150 LF 5 EA 26,000 CY 1,000 CY 4,356 CY 4,356 CY 10,000 CY 10,000 CY 25,000 TN 430 TN 9,600 TN 200 TN 3,100 TN 5,500 GAL 400 LF 52 LF 120 LF 50 LF 80 LF 1 EA 1 EA 15 EA 30 LF ing 6 EA - 12 CY 40 SY 68,700 SF 5 900 CY 21,000 LF 10.8 AC 810 LB 3,600 SY 7 EA 1 EA 60 LF 4 EA 3 EA 10 EA 2,500 SF 57 EA 80 EA 1 LS - City Project UNIT PRICE $2.50 $6.00 $50.00 $2.00 $6.50 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $200.00 $10.00 $200.00 $11.00 $1.50 $20.00 $24.00 $28..00 $32.00 $36.00 $430.00 $550.00 $800.00 $125.00 $110.00 $50.00 $3.00 $0.30 $6.00 $5.00 $1,000.00 $1.75 $1.30 $370.00 $1,000.00 $65.00, $1,100.00 $330.00 $110.00 $10.00 $100.00 $50.00 $20,000.00 AMOUNT $250 $900 $250 $52,000 $6,500 $4,356 " $8,712 $30,000 $40,000 $125,000 $86,000 $96,000 $40,000 $34,100 $8,250 $8,000 $1,248. $3,360 $1,600 $2,880 $430 .$550 $12,000 $3,750 $660 $600 $120 "'$20,610 $5,400 $105,000 $10,800 $1,418 $4;680 $2,590 $1,000 $3,900 $4,400 $2,590 $1,100. $25,000 $5,700 _ $4,000 $20,000 $785,704 Page 1 26 -Dec -f APPENDIX A City Project •fON-PARTICIPATING (KINGS ROAD TO CLIFF ROAD) EST'D ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Remove Concrete Curbing 100 LF $2.50 $250 Salv Pipe Culvert 100 LF $6.00 $600 Salv CB Castings 4 EA $50.00 $200 Common Excavation 8,400 CY $2.00 $16,800 Topsoil Borrow, CV 500 CY $6.50 $3,250 Salv Topsoil to Stkpile 1,000 CY $1.00 $1,000 Salv Topsoil from Stkpile 1,000 CY $2.00 $2,000 Core Excavation 1,500 CY $3.00 $4,500 Aggregate Backfill 1,500 CY $4.00 $6,000 Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 4,300 TN $5.00 $21,500 Bit Matl for Mix 75 TN $200.00 $15,000 Base Course Mixture 1,600 TN $10.00 $16,000 Bit Matl for Mix 50 TN $200.00 $10,000 Wear Course Mix 780 TN $11.00 $8,580 Bit Matl for Tack Coat 730 GAL $1.50 $1,095 12" RCP 130 LF $20.00 $2,600 Const CB, Des G 5 EA $800.00 $4,000 Reconst CB 10 LF $125.00 $1,250 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 10 EA $110.00 $1,100 .Conc C & G, Des B618 5,200 LF $5.00 $26,000 Roadside Seeding 2.7 AC $1,000.00 $2,700 Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 203 LB $1.75 $354 900 SY $1.30 $1,170 •Sodding 6" DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 Relocate Hydrant 3 EA $1,100.00 $3,300 Adjust Hydrant 3 EA $330.00 $990 Adjust Valve Box, Water 6 EA $100.00 $600 1-1/2" Copper Service Grouping 3 EA $500.00 $1,500 Connect to Ex MH/CB 3 EA $370.00 $1,110 SUBTOTAL --NON-PARTICIPATING * * * * *. * * * * * *.* * * * * $157,349 PROJECT 460 - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY - MSA PART. (Cliff Rd to Beau D Rue Dr) $785,704 NON -MSA PART. (Kings Rd to Cliff Rd) $157,349 5% CONTINGENCIES $47,153 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS . . . . . . . . . $943,053 25% ESTIMATED OVERHEAD $235,763 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS . . . . . . $1,178,816 • Page 2 26 -Dec - 3 • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS PARCEL FRONT LESS ASSESSABLE PROPOSED PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE CREDIT FOOTAGE RATE ASSESSMENT --------7--------------------------------------------------------------- Section 19 10-01900-011-54 1,260 1,260 $78.45 $98,847 10-01900-011-55 155 155 $78.45 $12,160 Cedar Grove #1 Blk 2, Lt 12 592 592 $78.45 $46,442 Blk 8, Lt 4 130 75 55 $78.45 $4,315 Blk 8, Lt 3 166 166 $78.45 $13,008 Blk 8, Lt 2 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Blk 8, Lt 1 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Section 30 10-03000-011-25 200 200 $78.45 $15,690 10-03000-020-25 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 10-03000-030-25 100 100 $78.45 $7,845 10-03000-011-27 596 596 $78.45 $46,782 10-03000-010-29 270 270 $78:45 $21,182 10-03000-191-08 150 150 $78.45 $11,768 10-03000-192-08 712 712 $78.45 $55,856 10-03000-012-76 817 817 $78.45 $64,094 Peaceful Hg.ts Outlot A 285 75 210 $78.45 $16,474 Blk 1, -Lt 1 236 75 161 $33.75 $5,434 Cedar Ridge 1st Blk 1, Lt 1 225 225 $33.75 $7,594 Blk 1, Lt 3 207 75 132 $78.45 $10,330. Blk 2, Lt l 350 75 275. $78.45 $21,574 Cedar Grove No 4 _ Blk 6, Lt 12-16 388 388 $33.75 $13,095 Mari Acres • Blk 1, Lt 1 280 75 205 $78.45 $16,082 Mari Acres 2nd Blk 1, Lt 1 327 327 $78.45 $25,645 Blk 3, Lt .2 693 693 $78.45 $54,396 . Blk 3, Lt 3 270 75 195 $78.45 $15,298 Cedar Ridge Comm Park Add'n Blk 1, Lt 1 310' 75 235 $78.45 $18,436 Blk 2, Lt 1 341 75 266 $78.45 $20,868 Page 1 26 -Dec -85 APPENDIX B PARCEL FRONT LESS ASSESSABLE PROPOSED PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE CREDIT FOOTAGE RATE ASSESSMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Section 31 10-03100-020-06 264 264 $16.88 $4,455 10-03100-030-04 132 132 $16.88 $2,228 10-03100-050-04 132 132 $16.88 $2,228 10-03100-060-04 132 132 $16.88 $2,228 Flour Bin Intl 1st Blk 1, Lt 1 437 437 $78.45 $34,290 Cedarview Add'n Blk 1, Lt 1 168 168 $78.45 $13,.213 Blk 1, Lt 2 100 100 $78.45 $7,845 Blk 1, Lt 3 120 120 $78.45 $9,414 Durning's Subd'n Blk 1, Lt 1 172 172 $78.45 $13,454 Blk 1, Lt 2 213 213 $78.45 $16,710 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals 11,155 675 10,480 $746,927 • APPENDIX C PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing • Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing 1st Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes .• 37 January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 April 15, 1985 May 20, 1985 Fall, 1986, Spring, 1987 May, 1988 ASSESSMENT RATES a■■m■■se■osmaos **************** COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL MULTIFAMILY FULL RESIDENTIAL HALF RESIDENTIAL S CORNER LOT CREDIT EXISTING UTILITIES SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PROPOSED. UTILITIES WATER MAIN &.SERVICES STORM SEWER • . MANHOLE ® CATCH BASIN ® city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard PUBLIC STREET IMPROV ENTS plate #: _ WORKS PROJECT 46 3 DEPARTMENT I jAA, 3 Existing 42' RCP SY S. NA T'SSTA 10077 +:ircleExisting36' RCP'SL SITI N 5 4 .- .. STA 8014 + _ PIn Oak Drive Proposed Catch Basin; } I 010-06 15' RCP St: S. MN DOT Ex: 12' RCP St: S. ROW PLAT NO. 19-11 .,.. (--� Proposed CatcH Basins ® Ex.. 12: RCP St: S. - I 020-06 32' Roadway STA 0+00 2 ' JOHNSON FIR T ADDITION Q K`` ---- — s � ingsi Road 0 100 400 60 .200 city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC STREET IMPROV ENTS WORKS PROJECT 460(3V 1` 2 1) DEPARTMEN • 3 M RI SECON1 MARI A FIRST 1 1 STA 26t kC i ES 1 rmrTtnti .. MN DOT Ex. 2' RCP S. ROW PLAT NO, 19-10 -crFi f r Ra avtl 1 MN DOT DURNING'S ROW PLAT. NO.. 19-11 2 SUBDIVISION • 1 • CLEARVIEW 2• 1 ' ADDITION a; :S I ' CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL u• Cliff Drive it401 'j • PARK ADDITION 52' Roadway �• 2 �i • Ex. Trail , �1• 1. ii -County: -Ro-a& 3'1- - S T A-2 tf 6A — --- — FLOUR BIN INTERNATIONAL 1ST AD ITION 1 •7 2 :— 48' Roadway .030=04 60-04 Ex. 42' RCP St. S. • I " 060-04 MU 0 100 4001N 60 200 - f STA tOt77 t 32' Roadway city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: pima rd PUBLIC STREET IMPRO ENTS WORKS PROJECT 460 2 DEPARTMENT •I 3 240. RCP St: S. — 1 .i.. 2 • _Erlri Drive __,�I 3 Pond Q z$TA 34�fi N I� Cl).� II` MARI ACRES w U � .aST ADDITION Q 2 ¢ \\ CITY OF EA.GAN \\ 0.30-00 Ex. 72. CP St. S.— city of eagan PUBLIC $ �WORKS DEPARTME Erin. Drive I I . RAHN PARK 8' Trail 28#3 i 4, 5 ; . e' 7 CED R LIF SEC ND AD ITI N 1 %Proposed Retaining Wall 1 11 2 1 3. . 1 CEAR CLI F 2 1.. 2.. 3 +----Cliff HIII Lane 1 FIRST D ITION 6 --- 5 j.. .2.. 3 .. 1 C D R C IF 1" - 2- . 1.. 2 3 Proposed Catch Basins 2 T RD DDITIOIN 3....: .. 4...-.. 6.: - 8 .. ' 17-B egin 8' Tra I - � � - ;; VEDAR CLIFFOMMERCIAL o PARK AE DITION ' Ex: Trail Outlot A STA 28t6� I- Cllf_f_Drlve � I II� . 0 -100 4001 . . . 50 .200 ]NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard STREET IMPRO MENTS .PROJECT plae 46C ._ 3 CEDAR RIDGE j. I 1 I ' 2e " I I CEDAR 2.. 3 -i! .I I 0 30 .� I I .I "Ex. 19' F outage Road �! s 37 GROVE I Is II 4 32 Cedar Ridge Circle- _ _ --- q1524W20 � 3 33 NO. 4 ' - i --- Proposed •� i 2 34 Catch Basin 2 i 6 FIRST ADDITION;; II i ' STA 49#.%l I* i- Shale Ls�e 7 . •� " Ex. 42' RCP St. S.— I ,T 10 ,s ,a .. -----4�-� Ex: Trail ,I II •! I i � R-AHN PARK 3 •: 8' Trail MARI ACRES ;I v 52' Roadway 2ND ADDITION 0 Proposed Retaining Wall -' Ex. 4' RCP St. S. • I ' CE AR CL FFE ONtADITON 2Erin Drive I* 3 4 6 8 7 i S_.I A 38 142 0 100 400 200 • city of eagah NICHOLS ROAD PRO_ POSEDoapproved: standard plate #: PUBLIC STREETIMPROYEMENTS m WORKS PROJECT 460(y 4 ' DEPARTMENT . I i� Pond • II, `_ 011-27 • i Outlot A ■ STA 8 23I+ ■ ■ PEACEFUL.HEIGHTS ■ I ■ Glory Drive - Ex. 19' F ntage Road ,9 _ 8' Trail CEDAR GROVE N 0.2 Proposed Catch asins -52' Roadway M .18 '17 1 18" 15 Marble Lane 7.....18o 19' R mv Ex sti g Frontage Road 18 0 .20 t+F11 Be in Tr it CEDAR GROVE 15' 21 I .I iLO PEA E --- — ® 1a 22 NO. 4 . i i t ■ 13 23 I 12 24 i 17.: ..25 I I 10 28 010:-29 = I P I li 9- 27 ■ I i _ .'.8....28 CEDAR RIDGE ■ I I FIRST ADDITION v I i 7 29 ■ I li Q 1V • o too 400 -- ._.,--------._.. ...-- 50 .200 • city of eagan . NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: Standard PUBLIC STREET IMPRO ENTS plate #: WORKS PROJECT 460 � 5 DEPARTMEN MN DOT Il; ROW . 011-25 PLAT NO. 19-7 020-25: i 030-25 3' Ex. 276 RCP' St. S. 4" I. e' 7 S 9 44'Roadw y ' I MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF - TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-5 Proposed Catch Ba ins—i i I. :i Ex. 33'' R P' St.: S.—*�: • - 'i ' I . .I 011-65 : 30 - Difitey-Road -- MN DOT Il; ROW . 011-25 PLAT NO. 19-7 020-25: i 030-25 3' 3 2 31 3 0 29 29 CEDAR 27 GROVE 4" 6" e' 7 S 9 10 2 52' Roadway NO. 1 8' Trail : 12-' iC 7419 1- — -- r- - ---Ccuat-Y:.Aoad No.: 30 _ : '191-oe CEDAR GROVE NO. 2 • 8 • I ..' • ---- 011=27 : 0 100 400 • - - • 50 .200 city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC STREET IMPRO ENTS WORKS PROJECT 460(q 6 DEPARTMEN U • I For Detail See Page 12 I� STA 101:80 t Proposed Catch Basins Ii 44Roadway I� STA 964638 Proposed Catch Basins -4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Ex:.3o' TRANSPORTATION RCP St. S: RIGHT OF WAY i PLAT NO. 19-5 / � oe i P, a0 �/ 'y .1 2 Ex..38' RCP St: S. • 3 • • 8 • 4' 6 Carnellan Lane CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 1 1 2 _Ex. P St: S. 1 6 1 CEDAR 2' 6 City of eagan. NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard PUBLIC STREET IMPRO MENTS plate #: WORKS PROJECT 460U 7 DEPARTMENT 1 3 4,. GROVE - STA 90#42 .Sapphire Lene Proposed Catch Basin y -- -, 8' •Trail i 1... 34 ... 2 NO. 1 Ex. 27': RCP St. S. II 2- 33. Q • i �I 3 3 2 0 100 400 ' V •I 4- 3 1 .i1 .__.. 60 200 City of eagan. NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard PUBLIC STREET IMPRO MENTS plate #: WORKS PROJECT 460U 7 DEPARTMENT 1 3 M RI SE ON MARI At FIRST i STA 26t C ES TUITION MN DOT ROW Ex. 7 RCP PLAT NO, 19-10 S • • VEDAR CLIFF C MMERCIAL, -- Cliff Drive PARK ADDITION 52' Roadway • 2 : _ Cliffeoanty--Road 32 1't64 —3— FLOUR BIN MN DOT FDURNINGS`INTERNA IONAL Ex: 12• - _RCP San. S. ® ROW 20 II 1ST ADDITION PLAT. NO.. 19-11 W ; SUBDIVISION ; 'I 2 Ex. 42' • �M RCP St. S. • � 48' Roadway • *o3o-oa CLEARVIEW : �- • *� 6" Water Sei vice 1 *050 -aa * 1 1/2" Water ervice ADDITION. '3; * .. : * oho -04 gDITI STA' 10t 32' Roadway - city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WORKS PROJECT 460 8 DEPARTMENT •I 1 CEDAR RIDGE II j rES ' 29 2...3 30 • 9' Fro tag 31 Proposed Catch Basin • I I 4 32 ' I A +2o Ceder Ridge Circle IS I 3 33 4 I 2 34 2 I . FIRST ADDITIO.4 I 1 (,e STA 7 •I iMI �� 17 16 15 Ex. 42` RCP St. S.7* ! Ex. Trail 3 MARI ACRES 2ND ADDITION Ex: 24/CP St: S. CEDAR load GROVE NO. 4 14 ® R-AHN PARK ■ 0 _ 52' Road f 6" Water Service — 8' Trail CE AR CL FF SEC ON A DIT ON , 2 - Erin Drive I' 3 .4 . 5 6 7 8. 9 13.T IAI `I 384 o ,oa 400 • city Of eagan. NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard 50 200 plate PUBLIC #: UTILITY IMPRO MENTS WORKS PROJECT 46 �1 9 DEPARTMENT IQ kD 0 0 1 L • Ex. 27'- RCP St: S. • • 44' Roadw y • N • • MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-5 1fl.Water Services: To Be Constructed Ex: 9' VCP Ex. 33'RCP MN DOT ROW PLAT NO. 19-7 N city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME 19 30 . DlfffeJRz o11 -ss: I �I 030-26 � • 52' Roadway- - . • 011-27 3 32 4' 31 6 30 0' 29 7 28 6 27 CEDAR GROVE 2 San. MH To Be Constructed • 8' -Trail 12 ' • NO. 1 r iYral ' --Cowvty. Road No.: 30 • • 191=oa CEDAR ' GROVE • : NO. 2 • • 8 • • • 0 .. 100 ---._. 400 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 460 60 .200 approved: standard plate #: 10 .:; I' I For Detail See: Page 12..E ly STA 101 8011 1 Proposed Catch Basins T04 2 CEDAR r Ex: 36' RCP SC S. • 3 • i 8 GROVE • 4 6 i Carnellan Lane NO. 3 1 1' I 2 8' rail 1s Ex. ' RCP e%: s., CEDAR 2' 1 6 - M34 _ L GROVE STA 90464 ,i _ Sapphire Lane .- Proposed Catch Basin I. .. I 1... 34 I.. 2 NO. 1 Ex; 27'' RCP St: S I 2' 33. - Q• � 3 32 N • city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME i I • • I 4 3 1 NIC H O L S ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: UTILITY IMPRO MENTS 11 PROJECT 4609 - 44' Roadway I - STA 98+38 Proposed Catch Basins MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Ex. 30' TRANSPORTATION RCP St: S. I RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.. 19-5 2 CEDAR r Ex: 36' RCP SC S. • 3 • i 8 GROVE • 4 6 i Carnellan Lane NO. 3 1 1' I 2 8' rail 1s Ex. ' RCP e%: s., CEDAR 2' 1 6 - M34 _ L GROVE STA 90464 ,i _ Sapphire Lane .- Proposed Catch Basin I. .. I 1... 34 I.. 2 NO. 1 Ex; 27'' RCP St: S I 2' 33. - Q• � 3 32 N • city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME i I • • I 4 3 1 NIC H O L S ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: UTILITY IMPRO MENTS 11 PROJECT 4609 - MN DOT ROW PLAT NO. 19-4 Edge of Existing Pave Existing I I 20' Easement W I Doc. iF" 440334 I 5 1 I I I I I W I I I, sy 100-08 iO cc I wl m � W W I O U m U CYm x ki sx- w w w W I I ~rr ae o P0a � �eaJ r -:�- 010-12 r I I Existing Curb & Gutter W � s , Proposed Easement W I . s : 100' Radius 8' Trail IN I r 5 ti i 025" 100 10 ._ 50 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSEDIa—pprovel standard STREET IMPRO ENTS plate #: PROJECT 460 12 111111111 19 MN DOT. ROW PLAT NO. 19-5 44Road — city of eagan PUBLIC m WORKS DEPARTMENT Existing I I 20' Easement W I Doc. iF" 440334 I 5 1 I I I I I W I I I, sy 100-08 iO cc I wl m � W W I O U m U CYm x ki sx- w w w W I I ~rr ae o P0a � �eaJ r -:�- 010-12 r I I Existing Curb & Gutter W � s , Proposed Easement W I . s : 100' Radius 8' Trail IN I r 5 ti i 025" 100 10 ._ 50 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSEDIa—pprovel standard STREET IMPRO ENTS plate #: PROJECT 460 12 111111111 ADDENDUM 1 UIre, PROJECT 460 FEASIBILITY REPORT NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1/30/86 I. The assessment area on page 3 should include the following area: Section 19 Cedar Grove #1 Block 2, Lots 8 - 11 II. The original report overlooked the financing of the miscellaneous utility modifications. Staff proposes to access the benefitted properties for the water service installations as follows: 1. 1/2 of 1" water service costs because of improving existing water service for ® lots 8 - 11, block 2 of Cedar Grove #1. 2. All costs for 6" water stubs & 1�" water service 11 The cost for the manhole installation will be the responsibility of the sanitary sewer maintenance fund. III. Staff revised the attached preliminary assessment roll to include items I.& II. IV. The attached exhibit 6A should replace exhibit 6 of the original report. Ex. 27' RCPSt: IS.,ji 11 1 44' Roadw y : MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF .I TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY • PLAT NO. 19-5 .Proposed Catch Ba ins_4i 17 Ex. 33' R P St._ S:—:�! MN,DOT ROW PLAT NO. 19-7 AQ ■ city of eagan PU13LIC WORKS DEPARTMEN D I f f to y'-Read--- 3" " 32 31 30 29 2e_ CEDAR 4:: 6 6 7: .8'27 9 10 . 1.1 GROVE 2 52' Roadway NO. 1- 8' -8' Trail ;..: 12. •i • • • ,r -- —0auatx-Road N0._ 30 CEDAR GROVE / : I1 0 NO. 2 030-25 • 8 • I ., O 60100 011-2J 00 .200 ..__... • 4 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: STREET IMPR�MENTS PROJECT 46 6a; • :191 -os 011-2s : j •; I 020-25I CEDAR GROVE / : I1 0 NO. 2 030-25 • 8 • I ., O 60100 011-2J 00 .200 ..__... • 4 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: STREET IMPR�MENTS PROJECT 46 6a; .• PARCEL DESCRIPTION --------------- Section 19 10-01900-011-54 10-01900-011-55 Cedar Grove 11 Blk 2, Lt 8 Blk 2, Lt 9 Blk 2, Lt 10 Blk 2, Lt 11 Blk 2, Lt 12 Blk 8, lit 4 Blk 8, Lt 3 Blk 8, Lt 2 Elk 8, Lt 1 APPENDIX B-1 REVISED PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS FRONT LESS ASSESSABLE PROPOSED PROPOSED WATER TOTAL FOOTAGE .------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CREDIT FOOTAGE RATE ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 1,260 1,260 $78.45 $98,847 10-03000-012-76 $98,847 155 155 $78.45 $12,160 lk 1, Lt 1 $12,160 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 . .,.. 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 592 592 $78.45 $46,442 Elk 1, Lt 1 $46,442 ... 130 75 55 $78.45 $4,315 10-03100-020-06 $4,315 166 166 $78.45 $13,008 ..-- 10-03100-060-04 -- $13,008 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Cedarview Add'n $5,884 .. ... .. 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Elk 1, Lt 3 $5,884 Section 30 200 10-03000-011-25 200 10-03000-020-25 75 10-03000-030-25 100 10-03000-011-27 596 10-03000-010-29 270 10-03000-191-08 150 10-03000-192-08 712 10-03000-012-76 817 Peaceful Rgts 596 270 Outlot A 285 lk 1, Lt 1 236 Sar Ridge 1st Blk 1, Lt 1 225 Blk 1, Lt 3 207 Blk 2, Lt 1 350 Cedar Grove No 4 $11,768 Elk 6, Lt 12-16 388 Mari Acres 712 Blk 1, Lt 1 260 Mari Acres 2nd $55,856 Blk 1, Lt 1 327 Elk 3, Lt 2 693 Blk 3, Lt 3 270 Cedar Ridge Comm - Park Add'n $16,474 Elk 1, Lt 1 310 Blk 2, Lt 1 - 341 Section 31 - 10-03100-020-06 264 10-03100-030-04 132 10-03100-050-04 .132 ..-- 10-03100-060-04 -- _.--_ 132 Flour Bin Int'1 1st 132 Blk 1, Lt 1 437 Cedarview Add'n $10,330 Blk 1, Lt 1 168 Blk 1, Lt 2 _ 100 Elk 1, Lt 3 120 Durning's Subd'n 388 Blk 1, Lt 1 172 Blk 1, Lt 2 ------------------------------- 213 Totals 11,455 • $16,082 200 $78.45 $15,690 $15,690 75 $78.45 $5,884 $5,884 100 $78.45 $7,845 $7,845 596 270 $78.45 $46,782 $5,119 $51,901 $78.45 $21,182 $21,182 150 $78.45 $11,768 $11,768 712 $78.45 $55,856 $55,856 817 $78.45 $64,094 $64,094 75 210 $78.45 $16,474 $16,474 75 161 $33.75 $5,434 $5,434 225 $33.75 $7,594 $7,594 75 132 $78.45 $10,330 $10,330 75 275 $78.45 $21,574 $21,574 388 $33.75 $13,095 $13,095 75 205 $78.45 $16,082 $16,082 327 $78.45 $25,645 $25,645 693 $78.45 $54,396 $54,396 75 195 $78.45 $15,298 $15,298 75 235 $78.45 $18,436 $18,436 75 266 $78.45 $20,868 $20,868 264 $16.88 $4,456 $4,456 132 $16.88 $2,228 $2,559 $4,788 132 $16.88 $2,228 $2,559 $4,788 132 - $16.88 $2,228 $1,313 $3,541 - 437 $78.45 $34,290 $34,290 168 $78.45 $13,213 $13,213 100 $78.45 $7,845 $7,845 120 $78.45 $9,414 $9,414 172 $78.45 $13,454 $13,454 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 213 $78.45 $16,710 $16,710 675 10,780 $751,995 $14,963 $766,957 53 07 -Feb -88 CITY PROJECT 460 ® NIC OLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE EST'D ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Remove Concrete Curbing 100 LF $2.50 $250 Salv Pipe Culvert 150 LF $6.00 $900 Salv CB Castings 5 EA $50.00 $250 Common Excavation 26,000 CY $2.00 $52,000 Topsoil Borrow, CV 1,000 CY $6.50 $6,500 Salv Topsoil to Stkpile 4,356 CY $1:00 $4,356 Salv Topsoil from Stkpile 4,356 CY $2.00 $8,712 Core Excavation 10,000 CY $3.00 $30,000 Aggregate Backfill 10,000 CY $4.00 $40,000 Aggregat,e Base, Cl. 5 25,000 TN $5.00 $125,000 Bit Matl for Mix 430 TN $200.00 $86,000 Base Course Mixture 9,600 TN $10.00 $96,000 Bit Matl for Mix 200 TN $200.00 $40,000 Wear Course Mix 3,100 TN $11.00 $34,100 Bit Matl for Tack Coat 5,500 GAL $1.50 $8,250 12" RCP 400 LF $20.00 $8,000 15" RCP 52 LF $24.00 $1,248 18" RCP - 120 LF $28.00 $3,360 21" RCP 50 LF $32.00 $1,600 24" RCP 80 LF $36.00 $2,880 Onstall 12" FES 1 EA $430.00 $430 Install 1811 FES 1 EA $550.00 $550 Const CB, Des G 15 EA $800.00 $12,000 Reconst CB 30 LF $125.00 $3,750 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 6 EA $110.00 $660 Random Riprap, Cl I 12 CY $50.00 $600 Geotextile Filter 40 SY $3.00 $120 2" Bit Walk (Trailway) 68,700 SF $0.30 $20,610 Aggregate Base Placed, Cl 5 900 CY $6.00 $5,400 Conn C & G, Des B618 21,000 LF $5.00 $105,000 Roadside Seeding 10.8 AC $1,000.00 $10,800 Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 810 LB $1.75 $1,41.8 Sodding 3,600 SY $1.30 $4,680 Connect to Ex MH/CB 7 EA $370.00 $2,590 Standard San. MH (0-8) 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 6" DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 1" Water Service Groupings 4 EA $650.00 $2,600, Relocate Hydrant 4 EA $1,100.00 $4,400 Adjust Hydrant 3 EA $330.00 $2,590 Adjust Valve Box, Water 10 EA $110.00 $1,100 Timber Retaining Wall 2,500 SF $10.00 $25,000 Timber Tieback units 57 EA $100.00 $5,700 Steel Screw Anchors 80 EA $50.00 $4,000 Signal Modifications 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 �BTOTAL - PARTICIPATING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -$788,304 Pagel 02 -Feb -86 -PARTICIPATING (KINGS ROAD TO CLIFF ROAD) O EST''D TEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT. Remove Concrete Curbing 100 LF $2.50 $250 Salv Pipe Culvert 100 LF $6.00 $600 Salv CB Castings 4 EA $50..00 $200 Common Excavation 8,400 CY $2.00 $16,800 Topsoil Borrow, CV 500 CY $6.50 $3,250 Salv Topsoil to Stkpile 1,000 CY $1.00 $1,000 Salv Topsoil from Stkpile 1,000 CY $2.00 $2,000 Core Excavation 1,500 CY $3.00 $4,500 Aggregate Backfill 1,500 CY $4.00 $6,000 Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 4,300 TN $5.00 $21,500 Bit Matl for Mix 75 TN $200.00 $15,000 Base Course Mixture 1,600 TN $10.00 $16,000 Bit Matl for Mix 50 TN $200.00 $10,000 Wear Course Mix 780 TN $11.00 $8,580 Bit Matl for Tack Coat 730 GAL $1.50 $1,095 12" RCP 130 LF $20.00 $2,600 Const CB, Des G 5 EA $800.00 $4,000 Reconst CB 10 LF $125.00 $1,250 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 10 EA $110.00 $1,100 Conc C & G, Des B618 5,200 LF $5.00 $26,000 Roadside Seeding 2.7 AC $1,000.00 $2,700 Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 203 LB $1.75 $354 Sodding 900 SY $1.30 $1,170 to Ex MH/CB 3 EA $370.00 $1,110 Wonnect " DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 1-1/2" Copper Service Grouping 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 Relocate Hydrant 3 EA $1,100.00 $3,300 Adjust Hydrant 3 EA $330.00 $990 Adjust Valve Box, Water 6 EA $100.00 $600 SUBTOTAL - NON -PARTICIPATING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * $156,849 PROJECT 460 - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY MSA PART. (Cliff Rd to Beau D Rue Dr) $788,304 NON -MSA PART. (Kings Rd to Cliff Rd) $156,849 5% CONTINGENCIES $47,258 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS . . . . . . . . . $945,153 25% ESTIMATED OVERHEAD $236,288 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS . . . . . . $1,181,441 • Page2 'J�J 02 -Feb -86 • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Thirteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 463/CLIFF ROAD (STREETS) B,. Public Hearing for Project 463, Cliff Road (Streets - T.H. 3 to Inver Grove Heights) --The Dakota County Highway Department's capital improvement program proposes to reconstruct and surface Cliff Road (County Road 32) from Trunk Highway 3 to CSAH 71 in Inver Grove Heights. Due to the fact that the City of Eagan will be expected to participate in the cost of this project, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on January 7 in consideration of holding a public hearing on February 4. Enclosed on pages �through N is a copy of that feasibility report for the Counci 's informat on and review during the presenta- tion of this public hearing which will be coordinated by our consulting engineer who prepared the report. All formal notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all poten- tially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM_ To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 463 (Cliff Road - Streets) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of a cost participation • agreement with Dakota County. 6�9 1 REP -ORT ON DAKOTA C.S.A.H. No. 32 (CLIFF ROAD) STREET IMPROVEMENTS ® PROJECT No. 463 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 n FILE No. 49374 /eJ /�o.ce�icoa, Radeue, 14a e-i1da & f4d"442ied, YOW. SL Oa"4 A&WWO& 67t J ... C,u.N..lf.'ie0 Ln4:Nev Y1-61 2335 !V. 7w.4 dg4k rey 36 P -d, M- .. 55113 /1/,0..: 61.2-636-4600 December 9, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Dakota CSAH 32, Cliff Road Project No. 463 Our File No. 49374 Dear Mayor and Council: uurr c, nurrnnoo. Pr Rnbrn IV'. Ru,ome. P.F. Jrnrph C..4 i- 4. P.li. llrml/urr!A. Erre N.", P./i. Ro-ha•d l-1Irrruv, P. E, Junle, C. Oban, P.r, Glenn R, Cook, RE_ A'rirb A. Gorduo. I'. L'. ]humor E, f.irvrr, P.L. Ru h,,,d K hula, P F Roberr G, .Srhnnidil. P, F M.... 1.. .Sn,,W,. P.F. Donald C Rurror;/L Il F. lerrr A. Rourdmr, AE. AM,k A, I/unsnn. 11 f., 1M A. I irld. 141:, Alirherl T'. Rnnrncmn, BE. Rubra R. PJi//rr lr•. /t:i. Oo ld O. IoAR -.. 14 E. Cherlo A Erin snn N.OA, lln4on df. Okun Transmitted herewith is our report for Dakota CSAH 32, Cliff Road, Street Improvements, Project No. 463. The proposed improvement of CSAH 32 is discussed and presented in this report. A preliminary assessment roll is also • included. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, ONS ROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Angus TEA:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the 1 s/of�thhe Sta of Minnesota. -2i - / CSC ri�VMMaark A. ganson, P.E. Date: December 9, 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Department of lic Works ® Date:�L1, b r E -2345d �l/ ® SCOPE: This project provides for the City's portion of the upgrading of Dakota County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) within the City Limits. The entire Dakota County Project is from T.H. 3 to CSAH 71 in Inver Grove Heights and includes reconstruction of 800' of CSAH 71. Construction is proposed to be completed in two phases with grading and gravel base completion in 1986 and bituminous surfacing in 1987. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible and is in accordance with the Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project will be carried out as one contract and be administered by Dakota County. The City of Eagan will be required to enter into a 45/55 cost sharing agreement with Dakota County for.that portion of road within the City Limits. DISCUSSION: CSAH 32 from T.H. 3 to the Inver Grove Heights west boundary is C� traffic. Under this project, it is proposed to regrade the road to create safer traffic conditions and to improve storm water drainage through culverts and ditches. The selected typical roadway section is based on a 20 year de- sign structural strength of 9 ton. Because of the proposed regrading of this road on the westerly end of the project, the house on parcel 010-78 (D. Holz residence) will either be reloca- ted on the property or removed and the driveway entrance will be eliminated. If the house is relocated on the property, access will be provided through an entrance from the parcel to the east. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SLOPE EASEMENT ACQUISITION: A minimum 100' right-of-way will be acquired for CSAH 32. Within the City of Eagan, an additional 17' of right-of-way is required from Parcel 010-78 (D. Holz) to meet .this criteria. Page 1. 2345d 5Y approximately 15' wide and gravel surfaced. The approach to T.H. 3 and the at • grade railroad crossing are both very steep and pose hazards for westbound C� traffic. Under this project, it is proposed to regrade the road to create safer traffic conditions and to improve storm water drainage through culverts and ditches. The selected typical roadway section is based on a 20 year de- sign structural strength of 9 ton. Because of the proposed regrading of this road on the westerly end of the project, the house on parcel 010-78 (D. Holz residence) will either be reloca- ted on the property or removed and the driveway entrance will be eliminated. If the house is relocated on the property, access will be provided through an entrance from the parcel to the east. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SLOPE EASEMENT ACQUISITION: A minimum 100' right-of-way will be acquired for CSAH 32. Within the City of Eagan, an additional 17' of right-of-way is required from Parcel 010-78 (D. Holz) to meet .this criteria. Page 1. 2345d 5Y • r] C Due to the proposed extensive grading within Eagan on the west end of the project, slope easements will be required from all parcels within the City. The estimated amount of right-of-way acquisition and slope easements within the City of Eagan only are summarized below: Slope Right -of -Way Easement Acquisition (Acres) (Acres) SE 1/4, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 0.16 -- 010-78 (D. Holz) 0.28 0.08 NE 1/4, Section 36 010-02 (Dunn) 0.56 -- Total 1.0 0.08 The total County Road Improvements estimated quantity and cost of right-of-way and slope easement acquisition is summarized below. Acres Rate/Acre Right-of-way Acquisition 8.4 $10,000 Slope Easements 5.9 $ 2,000 Parcel 010-78 (Holtz) Relocation/Removal -- -- Total Estimated Cost 2345d Page 2. �n Estimated Cost $ 84,000 11,800 40,000 $135,800 ® AREAS TO BE INCLUDED: The areas to be included for both assessment and con- struction purposes include all parcels abutting or obtaining primary access to CSAH 32 between T.H. 3 and the east boundary of the City of Eagan. Construction Area SEZ, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 010-78 (D. Holz) NES, Section 36 010-02 (Dunn) Assessment Area SEZ, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 010-78 (D. Holz) NES, SEction 36 010-02 (Dunn) 010-01 (F. Holz) • COST ESTIMATE: The total estimated project costs are summarized below. Con- struction costs are based on estimated quantities provided by the County. • Right-of-way/Slope Easements Phase I Grading and Culverts Phase II Bituminous Surfacing Total Estimated Construction Cost + 5% Contingencies + 25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest Total Estimated Project Costs Page 3 2345d N / $ 135,800 $ 662,015 278,285 $1,076,100 53,805 $1,129,905 282,475 $1,412,380 ® ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties as shown on the attached drawing. A preliminary assessment roll is included in this report as Appendix A. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the benefited properties an amount equal to a comparable residential street. The City's 1986 rate for a standard 32' resi- dential street with concrete curb and gutter is $33.75. However, in this case where a rural road is being built, a reduced rate has been computed based on a comparable 24' residential street without curb and gutter. This rate equates to 70 percent of the standard residential rate or $23.63 per front foot. • sessment rate would be one-half of the total or $11.81 per front foot. For parcels that do not abut the street but have their primary access from the street through an easement, a standard front footage of 85' will be used to calculate the assessment. REVENUE SOURCES: As previously indicated, the,City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a 45/55 cost sharing agreement for that portion of the project within the City of Eagan. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the portion in the City of Eagan is 5.54% of the total project length. This rep- resents a total project cost in the City of Eagan of $78,246 (5.54% of $1,412,380). Therefore, cost sharing between the City of Eagan and Dakota County is estimated to be: Page 4. 2345d Z This rate is proposed to be assessed against all abutting property that is ® benefited by this project. For those_ properties used as residential, the as- • sessment rate would be one-half of the total or $11.81 per front foot. For parcels that do not abut the street but have their primary access from the street through an easement, a standard front footage of 85' will be used to calculate the assessment. REVENUE SOURCES: As previously indicated, the,City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a 45/55 cost sharing agreement for that portion of the project within the City of Eagan. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the portion in the City of Eagan is 5.54% of the total project length. This rep- resents a total project cost in the City of Eagan of $78,246 (5.54% of $1,412,380). Therefore, cost sharing between the City of Eagan and Dakota County is estimated to be: Page 4. 2345d Z • • Right-of-way/Slope Easements Phase I Grading & Culverts Phase II Bituminous Surfacing Total Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies County (55%) City (45%) Total $ 132,415 $ 3,385 $ 135,800 645,511 16,504 662,015 271,348 6,937 278,285 $1,049.,274 $26,826 $1,076,100 52,464 1,341 53,805 $1,101,738 $28,167 $1,129,905 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admr. & Bond Interest 275,433 7,042 282,4.75 TOTAL ............................. $1,377,171 $35,209 $1,412,380 Revenue sourcesto cover the cost of this project for the City of Eagan is as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Eagan's Portion $35,209. Eagan's Assessment $27,084 $35,209 $27,084 -$ 8,125 The estimated project deficit is $8,125 which will be the responsibility of the major street fund. 2345d Page 5. 0 • r1 U PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Complete First Phase Construction Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 2345d Page 6. January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 Spring, 1986 Spring, 1986 Fall, 1986 Fall, 1987 Fall, 1987 May, 1988 ® APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CSAH 32 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 463 Assessable=_ Total Parcel Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment SEZ, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 325 $23.63 $ 7,679.75 010-78 (D. Holz) 208.7 23.63 * 4,931.58 NEZ, Section 36 010-02 (Dunn) 570 23.63 13,469.10 010-01 (F. Holz) 85 11.81 1,003.85 TOTAL 1188.7 $27,084.28 *Assumes house is removed Page 7. 2345d NORTH 2200 4400 SCALE IN FEET ® C.S.A.H. 32 (CLIFF ROAD) STREETIMPROVEMENT CITY PROJECT NO.463 EAGAN, MINNESOTA END PROJECT BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. PAuI. Minn. Date: DEC., 19851( FIG. No.1 Comm. 49 37 4 JI 3 T c CLIFF RD. 0 (0'/ 1 1 1 EAGAN 010-77 CO. RD. 32 9 Q'. Q• CC Q� co NORTH oIo — 7e i 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET C.S.A.H. 32 (CLIFF ROAD) STREET ASSESSEMENT CITY PROJECT NO.463 EAGAN, MINNESOTA INVER GROVE HEIGHTS I 10TH ST. W. ®®® FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. /% [Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. 2 Comm.4937 4 Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Fourteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 461/YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (STREETS) C. Public Hearing for Project 461, Yankee Doodle Road (Streets - 35E to Lexington Avenue) --As a part of Dakota County's capital improvement program, Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) is proposed to be upgraded in 1986 to I -35E to Lexington Avenue. As a part of all county road improvements, the City will be required to participate in the construction costs. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was prepared by the consulting engineering firm Stgar, Roscoe, Fausch Inc., who are the consulting engineers retained by the County for the detailed design of this road improvement. This feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on January 7 with the public hearing being scheduled for February 4. Enclosed on pages � through is a copy of the feasibility report for t e Council's eview and information during this public hearing. All formal notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing on February 4. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the installation of Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road Streets) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of a cost participation agreement with Dakota County. .91 CJ FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 461 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD IMPROVEMENT (DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD 28) INTERSTATE 35E TO LEXINGTON AVENUE JANUARY, 1986 NESTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LANDSURVEYORS 630 Twelve Oaks Center, 15500 Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata Minnesota 55391 (612) 475-0010 AP ED BY: City of Eag Depa trrye� Date f Public Works ���� Council ate I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. - n 1L7L' , - - • IS�S� Commission No. 0850679 &7 0 r� STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL nSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS January 7, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mayor and Members o'f the Council: RE: YANKEE DOODLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS I -35E TO LEXINGTON AVENUE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY PROJECT NO. 461 Commission No. 0850679 Enclosed please find the Feasibility Study for street and utility improvements to Yankee Doodle Road' (Dakota County Road 2'8) from I -35E to Lexington Avenue. The project as proposed is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plans and is feasible from an engineering standpoint. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council and staff and with other interested parties to review any aspect of this study. Respectfully submitted, ST`RRGARR---IROSCOE{r,-FIAUSC�H, INC.' Timothy D. Phenow, P.E. Associate Robert B. Roscoe, P.E. Senior Vice President • JRD/TDP/jal Enclosure 630 Twelve Oaks Center, 15500 Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata MN 55391 (612) 475-0010 ® INDEX YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD 28) STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 461 Page Letter of Transmittal Index I. Introduction I II. Summary and Recommendations 3 III. Project Description 4 IV. Right of Way, Construction Easements, Permits 13 V. Estimated Costs 15 VI. Benefited Properties 16 VII. Assessments 17 VIII. City/County Cost Participation 22 IX. Project Schedule 23 Appendix - Detailed Construction Cost Estimate 24 • I. INTRODUCTION 11 Yankee Doodle Road (Dakota County Road 28) from Interstate 35E to Lexington Avenue (Dakota County Road 43) is presently a two lane rural roadway section in a developing area (see Figure 1). This study includes the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road to an urban roadway section with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities. Improvements to the Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue intersection are also proposed. In addition, the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain is considered to serve the parcels on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road. II. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The project as outlined in this study is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,675,770.00. The following comments and recommendations are presented for the Council's consideration. 1. It is recommended the City Council accept this Feasibility Study and schedule a public hearing for the proposed improvement to Yankee Doodle Road between I -35E and Lexington Avenue (County Road 43). 2. The project is anticipated to be administered by Dakota County. If the project proceeds, it is recommended the City of Eagan enter into a cooperative agreement with Dakota County on a 55/45 cost sharing program. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION STREET IMPROVEMENTS Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) is identified in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Transportation Plan as a minor arterial route running in an east -west direction through the north half of the City. Since County Road 28 will be under the jurisdiction of Dakota County, any improvements must be reviewed and approved by Dakota County. The roadway currently exists as a two lane rural roadway section. The land adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) is comprehended as community shopping center, limited business and mixed residential use in the City of Eagan's Land Use Guide Plan. Development is currently proceeding on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. Based on this necessary development and the future projected development of the area, it is necessary to upgrade Yankee Doodle Road. A traffic analysis memorandum prepared for Dakota County by Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc. in October of 1985 recommended a four lane divided roadway. with left turn lanes at the intersections (see Figures 2 and 3). In addition a right turn lane is proposed from eastbound Yankee Doodle Road to southbound Denmark Avenue, and left turn lanes on Lexington Avenue to east and westbound Yankee Doodle Road. The roadway is proposed to be an 86 foot wide, 9 ton design bituminous pavement with concrete curb and gutter. Figure 4 illustrates the proposed roadway section. Two through lanes with an 8 foot shoulder and 18 foot median are provided. The 18 foot median will be reduced to 6 feet to provide left turn lanes where necessary. The estimated cost for the proposed street improvements is $1,337,020.00. - 76- e T,--= w -. T -- STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF E A G A N FIGURE NO. 2 CONSULTING ENGINEERS R LAND SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) PROPOSED STREET & 530 TWELVE OARS CENTER. 6500 WAYZATA BLVD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MINNETDNRI, OTI 5539 CITY PROJECT N O. 4 6 1 '6121475 �MIDom° COMMISSION NO. 0 8 5 0 8 7 9 _ — U �OLC!p - ' rte_ I T,--= w -. T -- STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF E A G A N FIGURE NO. 2 CONSULTING ENGINEERS R LAND SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) PROPOSED STREET & 530 TWELVE OARS CENTER. 6500 WAYZATA BLVD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MINNETDNRI, OTI 5539 CITY PROJECT N O. 4 6 1 '6121475 �MIDom° COMMISSION NO. 0 8 5 0 8 7 9 �7 --------- ---- ------ --- - ----------- - ------ Z rcnING LGT ea�ee � If. ,L`,,I _ --- ------- --- --------- -- ----- -- 41- z--- --- 41 ------- -------- ----------- - .�T o o LQT D ZIS STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF E A G A N FIGURE NO. 3 CONSULTING ENGINEERS . L.SND SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) PROPOSED STREET & 630 TWELVE OAKS CENTER. ISWWAYZATABLVD, UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55391 (61 2) 47S_Nlo CITY PROJECT NO. 461 COMMISSION N0.0850879 TYPICAL SECTION EXISTING YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (COUNTY RD. 28 ) YANKEE DOODLE RD (CO. RD. 28) R/W sn' I ten' -GF' L. AGGREGATE BITUMINOUS TYPICAL SECTION YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (COUNTY RD. 28) rL YANKEE DOODLE RD (SURVEY LINE) (CO. RD. 28 ) R/W (EW.B. LANE E.B. LANE RAW 60' 60' - 65' I I 8' 8' 1 8' 12' 14' 9' 9' 14' 12' 8' 1 8' 8' 11 TRAIL I TRAIL I DETAIL A JT B618 CB,G TYPICAL ® STRGA&ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC CONSUL i1NG FNGINEfIRS 0 IANO SURVEYORS 630 TWELVE OAKS CENTER* ISSMWAYZATABLVD. MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA SS391 16191 675.0610 DETAIL A TACK COAT (2357) 1 1/4" BIT. WEARING (2361) 2" BIT. BINDER (2341) 2" BIT. BASE (2331) 12"AGG. BASE, CL.5 (2211) CITY OF EAGAN YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD.28) CITY PROJECT, NO. 461 DETAIL DETAIL A B 8618 C 8 G DETAIL B 2" BIT. WALK 6"AGG. BASE, CL.5 (2211) FIGURE NO. 4 TYPICAL SECTIONS COMMISSION NO. 0850679 0 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS r With the installation of curb and gutter and the filling of the rural roadway section ditches, lateral storm sewer is required. Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) between I -35E and Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) lies entirely within Storm Sewer Subdivision D as outlined in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The roadway abuts minor Subdivisions D-31, D- 19, D-18, D-30, D-29, D-20 and D-23 (see Figure 5). The trunk storm sewer for this area was installed in 1985 under the Town Centre development (Contract 85-7, Project 429). The forcemain between Ponds DP -5 and DP -4 is scheduled to be constructed in the Spring of 1986 under Project 443. This construction should complete the trunk storm sewer improvements for this area. It is proposed under this project to connect lateral facilities to the existing trunk facilities. At Denmark Avenue it is proposed to extend a lateral storm sewer from the existing 48" trunk main east to accommodate the runoff from the west of Town Centre Drive "100" (see Figure 2). East of Town Centre Drive 11100" storm sewer is proposed to be extended from the existing 18" line at the high rise entrance west to accept runoff between Town Centre Drive 11100" and the high rise entrance (see Figures 2 and 3). Lateral crossings are also proposed at Town Centre Drive 11100E" as well as the Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue intersection which would connect to existing facilities (see Figure 3). The estimated cost of the storm sewer improvements proposed under this project is $130,590.00. -,l- F I �- ""T, NNS �•rl H 8 ' 3 ' F-3 H-10 I / -q \ 1 N:1 \ / I F Nl IT fit -cd H 5 V M .I I F r q D-10 / `� F-5 _ � D_1�� D IS L'E I,. ( u 1 1 D-2 D-6 1 r,.,«� T nKE 2 1y�T., i I J •� -��� y --� E-6 �V- - I.., .'h JE -3 �. ISI rma: 1E.uG D-14 �� E-8.. K u; D-I2� L �.....: �aNt: E-5 i1 ,r....; C_I5 ; �- E-4 IF_7- \ C-18 11 D-16 ) 1 '� D-13 11� Iv r. \D-22 : Ili E, -II E I' \1 All D21D 24 \ E AN I ,T,f =1,iRl J -I9 C-17 \ I / ID -26 < E-13 YAN EE I D 31 D-18 DO DLE 1 �J\ �p,E 14 `- I ��1•. '� (}.O,—/a-10 D� 28)''x% ��E 17 Y _ I I t _—� C l 3' ICI2 1 % / D 19 I 4,4-30\-. I D23.,21 .�F"' 40 I C -II .10"' /D 28. �! I 1 E -IB A. D-26; j. / TISJ J4 I .. 2 i J-70 3 G /J-3 'IT i CJ 12c+aTn I J-5 II J-73` ��Y J ,�^�� C-22 J-2 /�� ji..;� J-20�� J 24 L J -If 'Sl J..S4 J-10 J-14 /J-16 I i P l / J-23` \ _ AJ -21, /�• J -I IJ -62 i( „�d--y -� J-63 7 J-32 I._ •� 1 \J-64 I J-53_ I J-54 1l� -V--I� /C J-33 Sll /' \B-3 /\y -58,c El's �STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE NO. 5 CONSUI TING ENGINEERS R )ANO SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN STORM 630 TWELVE OAKS CENTER. ISSOO WAYZATA BLVD. (CO. RD. 28) DRAINAGE PLAN MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA SS391 (612)475.0010 CITY PROJECT NO. 461 1 COMMISSION NO. 0850679 0 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS I C Trunk sanitary sewer exists on the east half of the proposed project on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. This project proposes an extension of an 8" sanitary sewer to the north to serve future development. This line is proposed to be located just west of the Lexington Avenue intersection (see Figure 6). The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan has been revised for this area. The sanitary sewer extension as proposed herein would accommodate a portion north of Yankee Doodle Road of Subdistrict H2 of District C and redirect that area to District N, Subdistrict V. The estimated cost for sanitary sewer improvements is $11,660.00. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Eighteen to twenty inch diameter trunk watermain exists along the entire Yankee Doodle Road corridor as comprehended in the Water Supply and Distribution Plan for the City of Eagan. This study proposes a 12" trunk watermain crossing at Town Centre Drive 11100". A 6" diameter watermain crossing is also proposed at the commercial drive entrance and Town Centre Drive "100E". These extensions are proposed to serve future development to the north (see Figure 6). The estimated cost associated with watermain improvements is $37,630.00. 4 013- 513 010-77 DAKOTA ELECTRIC 020-56 YANKEE DOODLE RD. (CO. RD. 28) mmmm 0— TLOTA UT OUTLOT A I DRIVE lo OUTLOT D OUTLOT G 0A L j Lj OUTLOT E > < OUTLOT F E OUTLOT B CENTRE \V C) OUTLOT D oLEGEND OUTLOT C EXIST. SAN. SEWER ii—>— PROPOSED SAN. SEWER EXIST. WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE NO. 6 CONSULTING ENGINEERS III I AND SURVIEVORS PROPOSED SAN. SEWER YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) AND WATERMAIN 630 TWELVE OARS CENTER. 15W WAYZATA BLVD MINNEIONK A MINNESOTA 55191 1 (612) .,S.wlo I CITY PROJECT NO. 461 COMMISSION NO. 0850679 0 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Eight foot wide bituminous trails are proposed on each side of Yankee Doodle Road. The trails are proposed to be constructed 1 foot inside the right of way. An alternate bid item for concrete trail on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road will be included in the construction documents. The estimated cost of trail improvements is $58,870.00. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Dakota County is proposing traffic signals be installed at the Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue intersection. It is proposed the costs be included herein and incorporated into the ® total project cost for the City of Eagan. is As part of this project, it is proposed to install signal conduit under the roadway for future signal systems at Denmark Avenue and the commercial entrance. The estimated cost of signal improvements is $100,000.00. �3 12 - • r 9 IV. RIGHT OF WAY,CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND PERMITS To improve Yankee Doodle Road to a divided roadway with turn lanes and trails, additional right of way is required. Currently, 50' of right of way is available on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road. An additional 10' is required to construct the proposed improvement. 60' to 65' of right of way exists on the south side, therefore, no additional right of way is required. Thirty-three feet of right of way exists on the east side of Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) north of Yankee Doodle Road. It is proposed to acquire an additional 17' of right of way north of the intersection. Table 1 provides a detailed summary of the required right of way and construction easements for each parcel. Prior to the start of construction, a permit will be required from Mn/DOT to construct portions of this project within Mn/DOT right of way. q�4 - 13 - ® TABLE 1 RIGHT OF WAY AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACQUISITION YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN CITY PROJECT NO. 461 Parcel P.I.N./ No.* Section Leaal Description 2A 10 10 01000 020 56 2 10 10 01000 010 56 10 01000 010 77 3 11 10 0 110 0 010 51 Apparent Owner Dakota Electric Robert J. O'Neil Northwest Life Insurance Co. Federal Land Co. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Tower Office Bldg. Part. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan -CW Partnership Property Research & Development 0 - 14 - Construction R/W Easement Required Required (Acres) (Acres) 0.74 2.12 0.23 0.36 0.03 0.16 0.2,9 0.11 0.57 0.36 0.97 4.26 5 15 Outlot A, Town Centre 70 First Addition 6 15 Outlot A, Town Centre 100 First Addition 7 15 Outlot'G, Town Centre 100 First Addition 8 15 Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 First Addition 9 15 Outlot E, Town Centre 100 First Addition 10 15 Outlot D, Town Centre 100 First Addition 11 14 Outlot D, Tomark Second Addition TOTAL ® *Parcel Nos. Per Figure No. 7 Apparent Owner Dakota Electric Robert J. O'Neil Northwest Life Insurance Co. Federal Land Co. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Tower Office Bldg. Part. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan -CW Partnership Property Research & Development 0 - 14 - Construction R/W Easement Required Required (Acres) (Acres) 0.74 2.12 0.23 0.36 0.03 0.16 0.2,9 0.11 0.57 0.36 0.97 4.26 ® V. ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated cost for City Project No. 461 is summarized below. The estimate includes construction costs and a 25% allowance for design, inspection, administration and capitalized interest.* A detailed estimate of construction costs is included in the Appendix. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Improvement Cost Street $1,337,020.00 Storm Sewer $ 130,590.00 Sanitary Sewer $ 11,660.00 Watermain $ 37,630.00 Trail $ 58,870.00 ® Traffic Signal $ 100,000.00 Total Project Cost $1,675,770.00 9 *These costs do not include acquisition of right of way or construction easements. ® VI. BENEFITED PROPERTIES The parcels benefited by the proposed improvements in City Project No. 461 are listed below: Parcel No.. Section 2A 10 2 10 3 11 5 15 6 ® 7 8 9 10 11 C J P.I.N. 10 01000 020 56 10 01000 010 56 10 01000 010 77 10 01100 010 51 Outlot A, Town Centre 70 First Addition 15 Outlot A, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Outlot G, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Outlot E, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Outlot D, Town Centre 100 First Addition 14 Outlot D, Tomark Second Addition Apparent Owner Dakota Electric Robert J. O'Neil Northwest Life Insurance Co. Federal Land Co. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Tower Office Bldg. Part. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan -CW Partnership Property Research & Development The following parties should be notified as the construction will directly affect their properties. Mr. Fred Sell, 1215 Yankee Doodle Road Carriage Hills Homeowners Association g7 - 16 - ® VII. ASSESSMENTS City Project No. 461 is proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties along Yankee Doodle Road. It is proposed to use the City of Eagan's standard assessment rates for street, storm sewer and trail improvements. The watermain and sanitary sewer laterals are proposed to be assessed directly to the benefiting parcels. Table 2 summarizes the proposed assessments on a parcel by parcel basis. Figure 7 shows the parcels proposed to be assessed. The following is an explanation of proposed assessment rates for the respective types of improvements. STREET AND LATERAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS It is proposed to assess street improvements based on the current zoning of the respective parcels Three rates are proposed: • Residential Rate: The basis for this rate is an equivalent 32 foot wide residential street built to current City of Eagan standards. The current residential rate is $33.75 per assessable front foot. This rate would be applied to all parcels currently zoned residential or agricultural. Multiple Residential Rate: The basis for this rate is an equivalent 44 foot wide minor collector street built to City of Eagan standards. The current multiple residential rate is $63.36 per assessable front foot and is proposed to be assessed to parcels zoned as multiple housing (R-3 and R-4). Commercial/Industrial Rate: The basis for this rate is an equivalent 52 foot wide major collector street built to current City of Eagan standards. The current commercial/industrial rate is 78.45 per assessable front foot and is proposed to be assessed to • parcels zoned as commercial or industrial. ® Lateral storm sewer improvements are proposed to be assessed using a ratio determined from the street assessments. A base rate is determined by dividing the total cost of storm sewer improvements .by the total assessable front footage. The determination of a rate for residential and multiple residential is calculated by dividing the standard street rate for each by the standard commercial/industrial rate and then multiplying each times the base rate for storm sewer. The commercial/industrial rate is proposed to be the base rate. Storm sewer assessment rates are proposed as follows: Base Rate = Total Cost = $130,590.00 = $16.72/F.F. Assessable F.F. 7,812.04 F.F. Commercial/Industrial Rate = Base Rate = $16.72/F.F. Multiple Residential Rate = $17.39/F.F. x $63.36 = $13.50/F.F. $78.45 Residential Rate = $17.39/F.F. x $33.75 = $7.19/F.F. • $78.45 0 The proposed combined rate for street and lateral storm sewer improvement assessments would be: Commercial/Industrial $95.17/F.F. ($78.45 + $16.72) Multiple Residential $76.86/F.F. ($63.36 + $13.50) Residential $40.94/F.F. ($33.75 + $7.19) TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Trail improvements are proposed to be assessed against all commercial/industrial and multiple residential zoned properties. The assessment rate is proposed to be $11.81 per assessable front foot. TABLE NO. 2 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY EAGAN CITY PROJECT NO. 461 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD 28) Assessable Commercial Multiple Watermain Total (*) Front Industrial Residential Residential Trails & Sanitary Estimated Parcel No. P.I.N./Legal Description Footage $95.17/FF $76.86/FF $40.94/FF $11.81/FF Services Assessment Section 10 2A 10 01000 020 56 208.73 8,545.41 8,545.41 2 10 01000 010 56 10 01000 010 77 3,445.60 141,062.86 43,160.00 184,222.86 Section 11 3 10 01100 010 51 135.00 12,847.95 1,594.35 14,442.30 Section 15 5 Outlot A, Town Centre 70 435.43 41,439.87 5,142.43 46,582.30 First Addition 6 Outlot A, Town Centre 100 548.23 52,.175.05 6,474.60 58,649.65 First Addition 7 Outlot G, Town Centre 100 467.55 44,496.73 5,521.77 50,018.50 First Addition 8 Lot 1, Block 1, 620.00 59,005.40 7,322.20 66,327.60 Town Centre 100 First Addition 9 Outlot E, Town Centre 100 180.00 17,130.60 2,125.80 19,256.40 First Addition 10 Outlot D, Town Centre 100 1,163.50 89,426.61 - 13,740.94 103,167.55 First Addition Section 14 11 Outlot D, Tomark Second 458.00 35,201.88 5,408.98 40,610.86 .Addition " Total Estimated Assessments 227,095.60 124,628.49 149,608..27 47,331.07 43,160.00 591,823.43 (f) Parcel No. Per Figure No. 7 0 -------------- ---..� w RESIDENTIAL STREET RATE J IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ST. RATE \\\\\\ COMM./INDUSTRIAL ST. RATE • 75' CORNER LOT CREDIT D STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE NO. 7 CONSUL TING E NGINE ERS I IANO SORVFN ORS PROPOSED YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) ASSESSMENTS EJO TWELVEMGENS KA MI •ESOT 55391 BLVD MINNEfONRN. MINNESOTA SSJ9. (612)4IS.WIB CITY PROJECT NO. 461 COMMISSION NO. 0850678 • • TOTAL ASSESSMENTS Improvement Streets and Storm Sewer Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Trail Total Total Proposed Assessment $501,332.36 $ 43,160.00 $ 47,331.07 $591,823.43 With the City's share being $793,630.00, the $201,806.57 deficit will be the responsibility of the City's Major Street Fund. This deficit will be greatly reduced when Parcel No. 2 (O'Neil property) develops and the City can assess the difference between the zoning at the time of development and the agricultural rate assessed under this project. ® VIII. CITY/COUNTY COST PARTICIPATION It is recommended the City of Eagan enter into a cooperative agreement with Dakota County for cost participation. The following table outlines the proposed city and county percentage for individual types of improvements. City of Eagan Dakota County Improvement Percenta4e Percentage Streets 45 55 Storm Sewer $ 64,510.00 $ 66,080.00 Catch Basins and Leads 45 55 All Other 100 0 New Sanitary Sewer 100 0 New Watermain 100 0 Trails Trails $ 31,540.00 North Side 100 0 South Side 0 100 • Existing Utility Reconstruction 45 55 Traffic Signals 50 50 Right of Way & Construction Easements 45 55 Based on these percentages, the estimated cost for the City of Eagan and Dakota County is estimated to be: Improvement City of Eaaan Dakota County Total Streets $601,660.00 $735,360.00 $1,337,020.00 Storm Sewer $ 64,510.00 $ 66,080.00 $ 130,590.00 Sanitary $ 11,660.00 $ 0.00 $ 11,660.00 Watermain $ 34,2.60.00 $ 3,370.00 $ 37,630.00 Traffic Signals $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 100,000.00 Trails $ 31,540.00 $ 27,330.00 $ 58,870.00 Total $793,630.00 $882,140.00 $1,675,770.00 These costs do not include acquisition of right of way or ® construction easements. 22 - • IX. PROJECT SCHEDULE KI Submit Feasibility Study Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Complete First Construction Phase Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 9� - 23 - January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 February 18, 1986 March, 1986 April„ 1986 Fall, 1986 Spring, 1987 Summer, 1987 May, 1988 0 • APPENDIX y5 - 24 - • • PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE ['OLI:I_E: r;;n(3D EA6r;N FF.O.IECT NO. 461 1 of 2 D STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS UNIT TF.h1 N7. STC! DE SC R',iPTI UNIT PRICE QUYNTITY AMOUNT �4�:'1.501 'uB]L[lATI014 01.`11 iCLEi,6 AND GRUB RuADWA`'= SUF;t01i,L 11ISCELI-i!,lEI)U�. Or'. r,0 CWlh11N Ei:Cii�%AIIuH !F'i e15.80:% 5UB6RAIIE EXCAVATIU11 :t0`_.52:] CCMNUt•1 BORF;Gl4 iL,') SUB,I0tAL i3R(.DINO LUHP SUN 10000.00 1 i0000.00 EA -CH 2800 2500.[0 1 2500.00 LUMP SUM 4000.00 1 4000.00 500 1500.00 104.;0'_, 16500.00 C.U. '(G. 2.00 20000 40000.00 CU. YD. 2.00 24002 48000.00 CU. YL. 3.50 50400 176400.00 264'100.00 21!44.501 REr101.�E C12NCRETF CURD & GUTTER LIN. FT. 2.00 2800 5600.00 2104.501 RE:tU7VE: PIPE CULUr:RI I_IN. FT. 5.00 500 1500.00 104.;0'_, RE MMOVF CONCRETE I'IEDIA!`1 SO. FT. 22.00 4000 6000.00 G104.51i5 REi'1OVE BI IU(IINOU5 PAVE1ENI SG!. YD. 2.00 25000 50000.00 2104.5-41 ;ALVA6E FENCE LIN. FT. 3.00 1500 4500.00 1104.62'1 SALVAGE I'IF'E SEWER LIN. FT. 8.00 10'1: 816.00 2iO4.523 SAL VALE. CONCRETE APRON EACH 100.00 11 _ 201.00 101.604 x111.1_ ItI'IUMINOUS SURFACE SO. YD. 2.00 5800 11600.00 SUBTOTAL SALVAGE. AND RENOVALS 8'_++216.00 ['211.501 1)L;GFiF.Gi1TFi BASE CLASS TON 6.50 32000 206000.00 2221.501 AGGREGAIE SHOULDERING CLASS 1 TON 7.00 240 1680.00 23.7,1.504 RIIUNINIIUS MATERIAL. FOR NIa.IURE TUN 220.00 231 52580.00 23:1.514 BASE COURSE NIXI URE TON 12.00 5300 6:'600.00 1. .0 Si=ib11 NG B.11UNINOUS PAVEMENT SURFACE L1•I. FT. .2.00 2676 5752.00 2:41.504 BIIUMINDUS MATERIAL FOR NI:i"!URE TLIN 220.00 235 51100.00 2._41.510 FINDER COURSE HIXILIRE ION 12.00 4700 56400.00 361.504 ii3PHAL! CEIIE14T TUN 225.00 208 46800.00 2:361.508 WEARING COURSE NIYIUF:E ION 15.00 3300 49500.00 %.502 BITUIIINOU5 M:,TERIAL FUR TACK: COAT GAL. 2.00 3200 6400.00 1521.°:0I 4" CONCRE1E MEDIAN SO. FT. 1.00 27000 27000.00 5'1.`_OI CONCRETE CURB AND GUffER. DESIGN B618 LIN. FT. 5150 18530 101.915.00 531.`_0i 6° 1:.0I41:.RE'I'E DRIVEWAY PAVE NEN'I SO. YD. 2;1.00 45 1.125.00 SUBTOTAL PAVING 672452.00 :.211.501 AGGRE13AfE BiiSE CLASS 5 TON 6.50 2400 15600.00 2141.601 2" BITU111NOUS WALK.. PLACED SO. YD. 4.50 7000 31500.00 SUET IAL 1'I?A,il. 47.100.00 2501.571 INSTALL n:C. PIPE :SEWER LIN. F1'. 6.00 10 2 616.00 2508.511 12" RC PIPE BEIviER. LIN. Ff. 22.00 1250 17500.00 1/7/86 COMM. NO. 0850679 5118T01A1. CRAINAGE_ J07.607, 8" FIFE SEWER J."��06.J0if f L(Id3TFIJI CT MANHOLE DESIGN 200 _506.,11 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE SUBTCI AL SANTARY SEWER 104471.00 LIN. FT. 24.00 115 2-160.00 EACH 1000.00 1 1000.00 LIN. FT. 150.00 37 5J65.00 9325.00 504.602 RELOCATE H',DRANT AND 'VALVE EACH 1000.00 - 2000.00 2 of 2 F:ELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 800.00 1 STRGAR-ROSCOETAUSCH,INC. PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE LIN. FT. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LANDSURVEYORS (ANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN PROJECT NO. 461 1't:" DIP !dATEEh1AIi4 LIN. FT. 30.00 130 [50:.511 1J" PC F'IF'E SEWER 12" WATER EUiI'ERFLY VALVE WITH BO.( LIN. FT. 24.00 860 21120.00 2 03.511 la'" RC F'IF'E SEWER EACH LIN. FT. 28.00 240 6720.00 LSm:i. 731.IdSTALL, CONCRETE A.PI% 1500.00 EACH 100. mm 50.4.602 200. m0 iJmG. JWp CUNSTkI1CT MANHOLE DESIGN 230 ('4'GIA1 EACH 800.00 1 600.00 2506.506 CC1N51RU1T 0A111H0LF. RESIGN 200 300.00 EACH 800.00 3 2400.00 2,06.,5 09 COIiSTRUC1 i;A1CH BASIN DESIGN 230 (4 DIP.) EACH 820.00 4 '200.00 2506.17111 LON:=TRUC,'I Ci;iCH BASIN DESIGN 232 EACH 600.00 37 22200.02 2506.511 RECONSTRUCTMANHOLE 1/7/86 LIN. FT. 150.00 5i 7965. m0 506.516 CASIINC ASSENDLIES NO. EACH 2,0.00 42 10500.00 2511.501 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTINGS EACH 1J2.00 7 1050.02 5118T01A1. CRAINAGE_ J07.607, 8" FIFE SEWER J."��06.J0if f L(Id3TFIJI CT MANHOLE DESIGN 200 _506.,11 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE SUBTCI AL SANTARY SEWER 104471.00 LIN. FT. 24.00 115 2-160.00 EACH 1000.00 1 1000.00 LIN. FT. 150.00 37 5J65.00 9325.00 504.602 RELOCATE H',DRANT AND 'VALVE EACH 1000.00 - 2000.00 504.60' F:ELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 800.00 1 800.00 1500 6" GIF 41A1EF.MAIIT LIN. FT. 18.00 300 5400.00 •503.603 504.603 1't:" DIP !dATEEh1AIi4 LIN. FT. 30.00 130 3900.00 '04.60: 12" WATER EUiI'ERFLY VALVE WITH BO.( EACH 1200.00 1 1200.00 504.602 6" WATER GATE VALVE WITH BOX EACH 500.00 3 1500.00 504.602 6" 1; 18+" WET TAF' CONNECTION EACH 1500.00 2 3000.00 50.4.602 12" '.i 18" CONNECTION EACH 3000.00 1 31000.00 504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE EACH 100.00 _ 300.00 J04.620 WATERMA]IJ F11TIPIGS POUND 1.80 5000 4000.00 SUBTOTAL WATERMAIN '0100.00 565.604 TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYSTEM 80000.00 L 80000.00 SUBTOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 80000.00 557.607, INSTALL FENCE LIN. FT.. 3.00 1500 4500.00 257'.,01 ROADSIDE SEEDING ACRE 1500.00 4 6000.00 25%'1.502 SEED MIXTORE NO. 5 POLING 5.00 170 850.00 2575.505 SODDING SO. YD. 2.00 10000 2000Q.@0 2,75.511 MULCH MATERIAL. TYPE 1 DISC- ANCHORED T'111 200.00 7 1400.00 2575.531 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER. ANALYSIS 10-10-10 TOH 300.00 1 300.00 SLiB'TOTA. LANDSCAPING 330JO.00 ® TOTAL PROJECT 1340614.00 qj 1/7/86 COMM. NO. 0850679 9 -10 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PROJECT 452/BERYL POND (STORM SEWER OUTLET) D. Public Hearing for Project 452, Beryl Pond (Storm Sewer Outlet) --In response to a petition received from the developers of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition (Jim Durning) the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to discuss the proposed trunk storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -50 through Rahn Park to Rahn Road. This feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on January 7 in considera- tion of scheduling a public hearing on February 4. Enclosed on pages�throughis a copy of the feasibility report for the C uncil's information, and review during this public hearing. Because this project requires construction through a portion of Rahn Park, the Public Works Director reviewed this report with the Park Commission at their January 9th meeting. The Park Commission expressed several concerns pertaining to the construction impact on this heavily wooded portion of park property. Subsequently, they requested additional investigation pertaining to alternative alignments which would minimize the impact. The consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., who prepared the original feasi- bility report, also prepared additional information pertaining to these alternative alignments which will be discussed at the Council meeting for additional c nsideration of project approval. Enclosed on page s_ff�through l is the additional information pertaining to these alternative alignments which have some merit in minimizing impact on park property and its ability to recover .future lateral benefit assessments to help further defer its ultimate cost. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 452 (Beryl Pond - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • .• ON PONDS AP -50, AP -49, AND AP -25 OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.4.52 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA Wgs�:161 FILE N0.49364 i�ossrdficoa, Rade, yq d.1dd, a Adoa&-kA, ✓.ac. Gia.""«g e" St /tea" Af4wwj la q% ef-Ba2adzwe, 11 36 S[, Barr/. M. ,_, 55113 /)Aa,..: 6/2 - 636-4600 December 6, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Ponds AP -50, AP -49 6 AP -25 Outlets Project No. 452 Our File No. 49364 Dear Mayor and Council: Ouo G. N,.nrrtrou. P.F.", RW..I A. R¢mnr. RE. 111,11/u..I A. Lla,b,,r. 0. E. Rirh... I;. 6-e, P.G. Jmwu lC 011.a. P.li, Glenn R. Coo A. 1•. lir Thomas E. :vnlr, P.h RirhmB n". Fnvrr, 11 G. Rabrrl G. 5,h 0,1 VE, M11arvir: L .lorrulo. P.li. Dowhl C. Jerrr :l. Board,,,. Pre. Afore 1. 7M K, I'MI, P.L. Ifirhael T. Nuur,ramn. klC. Ruben R. Plq/nh, P.E. nariao. carxora. P.E. chadr, A. F.rirF sun Leo .+1. P..W A'r /M. -b" AL Ghen Transmitted herewith is our report for Ponds AP -50, AP -49, and AP -25 Outlets, Project No. 452. This report covers trunk storm sewer construction and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. • We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK S ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH: li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: December 6, 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by:_ Department of Public Works • Date: -- 2311d • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer out- lets for Ponds AP -50, AP -49, and AP -25. This project is the result of a peti- tion received from the owner of the two lots in Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition which includes a portion of Pond AP -50. An office building ex- ists on the southerly lot abutting Pond AP -50 while a future office building is proposed on the northerly lot. Pond AP -49 is included within Rahn Park lo- cated northeasterly of Pond AP -50 and west of Rahn Road. Pond AP -25 is lo- cated easterly of Pond AP -49 directly east of Rahn Road. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan with the exception of the proposed normal water level for Pond AP -49 included in Rahn Park. It is proposed as part of this project the normal water level for Pond AP -49 be lowered to 874.1 as opposed to the recom- mended level of 881.7 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. A normal water elevation of 881.7 would destroy large established trees around Pond AP -49 and also flood an additional 0.8 acre of land above the 874.1 elevation. To pro- vide a gravity outlet at the lower elevation is more costly (approximately $18,000), however., based on the permanent impact to Rahn Park, it is recom- mended the lower elevation of 874.1 be established as the normal water eleva- tion for Pond AP -49. DISCUSSION: A portion of this project provides for constructing a trunk storm sewer outlet from Pond AP -50 to Pond AP -49. Two alternate alignments are pro- posed for this construction as shown on the attached drawing. Alternate A proposes constructing a 12" RCP gravity storm sewer northerly adjacent to the easterly line of the Cedar Cliff Additions into Rahn Park. The line would continue northerly in Rahn Park and then easterly through a low area to Pond • AP -49. Alternate B proposes constructing the same size gravity sewer easterly Page 1. 2311d /0/ Park along the same alignment as Alternate A to Pond AP -49. The alignment for Alternate B is approximately $12,000 more costly due to deeper cuts and is contingent on future street development through Parcel 011-76. Presently no approved plans exist for development of this parcel. Alternate A, however, does require more ,tree removal and impacts the park property for a greater distance. It is also proposed as part of this project to construct a gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond AP -49 and Pond AP -25 to Pond AP -24. Due to the recom- mended level for Pond AP -49 being lowered, it is necessary that the gravity storm sewer from Pond AP -49 be constructed around Pond AP -25 rather than into it due to its higher water level. The gravity storm sewer from each pond • would then combine as one on the northerly side of Pond AP -25 and continue northerly to an existing 24" RCP storm sewer adjacent to Pond AP -24. It is assumed the gravity storm sewer beneath Rahn Road will be jacked or augered. Design considerations for each pond are listed below: NWL from Pond AP -50 through parcel 011-76 along an anticipated street alignment to (cfs) Rahn Park. The alignment would then continue northerly and easterly in Rahn Park along the same alignment as Alternate A to Pond AP -49. The alignment for Alternate B is approximately $12,000 more costly due to deeper cuts and is contingent on future street development through Parcel 011-76. Presently no approved plans exist for development of this parcel. Alternate A, however, does require more ,tree removal and impacts the park property for a greater distance. It is also proposed as part of this project to construct a gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond AP -49 and Pond AP -25 to Pond AP -24. Due to the recom- mended level for Pond AP -49 being lowered, it is necessary that the gravity storm sewer from Pond AP -49 be constructed around Pond AP -25 rather than into it due to its higher water level. The gravity storm sewer from each pond • would then combine as one on the northerly side of Pond AP -25 and continue northerly to an existing 24" RCP storm sewer adjacent to Pond AP -24. It is assumed the gravity storm sewer beneath Rahn Road will be jacked or augered. Design considerations for each pond are listed below: NWL HWL Storage Outflow Elev. Elev. (Ac.Ft.) (cfs) Pond AP -25 880.5 888.5 22.0 8.5 Pond AP -49 874.1 888.0 22.9 1.0 Pond AP -50 886.0 894.0 12.0 2.8 EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary construction easements are required from the unplatted parcels between Pond AP -50 and Rahn Park and between Pond AP -25 and AP -24. It is assumed for purposes of this report ponding easements for Ponds AP -50, AP -25, and AP -24 will be dedicated at the time they develop. No • easements are proposed to be acquired through Rahn Park. Listed below are the easements required for this project: Page 2. 2311d /Q Y • Parcel Description SW 1/4, SECTION 29 012-50 SE 1/.4, SECTION 30 011-76: Alternate A 011-76: Alternate B Permanent Easement (Acres) 0.4 0.4 0.5 Temporary Easement (Acres) 2.1 1.2 2.8 It is assumed all easements can. be acquired at no cost to the City. AREA TO BE INCLUDED ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 29 SW 1/4, SECTION 29 Parcel 012-50 Parcel 012-50 SE 1/4, SECTION 30 SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 Parcel 011-76 • NE 1/4, SECTION 31 Parcel 012-76 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 011-03 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Pond AP -50 TO AP -49 Alternate A $84,920 Alternate B 96,170 POND AP -49 AND AP -25 TO AP -24 88,570 The total estimated project cost for Alternate A and B is $173,490 and $184,740 respectively which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal engineering, administra- tion, and bond interest. These costs do not reflect any easement acquisition costs. Page 3. 2311d 163 r1 U ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All project costs included herein are considered trunk with the exception of the 24" diameter east -west storm sewer for Alternate B from Pond AP -50. The oversizing cost for this section is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed entirely to Parcel 011-76. Lateral cost will be revised based on final costs. It is also proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area storm sewer assessment which have not been previously as- sessed but benefit from this project. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. TRUNK RATES: Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Storm Sewer Single Family $0.050/sq.ft. Comm./Ind. $0.075/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance ALTERNATE A Trunk $173,490 Trunk Area Assessment $178,107 TOTAL $173,490 $178,107 +$4,617 Page 4. 2311d /O �] • Trunk Lateral Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Assessment TOTAL $182,725 2,015 $184,740 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans 6 Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment due with Real Estate Taxes 2311d Page 5. 1005 $178,107 2,015 $180,122 -$ 4,618 January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 Spring, 1986 Summer, 1986 Fall, 1986 Fall, 1986 May, 1987 ® APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PONDS AP -50, AP -49, & AP -25 -OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 452 ALTERNATE -A - POND AP -50 TO AP -49 1,150 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $23.00/l.f. $26,450 260 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $31.00/l.f. 8,060 130 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $52.00/l.f. 6,760 130 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 30'-35' dp. in pl. @ $64.00/l.f. 8,320 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 950 15 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 900 2 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/ea. 800 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/lin.ft. 1,500 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 4 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Ac. 4,000 1,670 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,670 Total $62,210 +5% Contingencies 3,110 $65,320 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 19,600 TOTAL ALTERNATE A .................................... $84,920 Page 6. 2311d /O • • ALTERNATE B - POND AP -50 TO AP -49 210 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in p1. @ $30.00/l.f. $ 6,300 350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $23.00/l.f. 8,050 330 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $31.00/l.f. 10,230 530 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $52.00/l.f. 27,560 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 5,700 60 Lin.ft. MH depth 3,520 greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/l.f. 3,600 2 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 800 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/L.S. 1,500 150 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,500 3 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Ac. 3,000 1,420 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,420 Total $70,460 +5% Contingencies 3,520 $73,980 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 22,190 TOTAL ALTERNATE B ................................... $96,170 2311d Page 7. /D7 POND AP -49, AP -25 TO EXISTING 24" RCP 200 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $30.00/l.f. $ 6,000 440 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $38.00/l.f. 16,720 340 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $23.00/1.f. 7,820 120 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $31.00/l.f. 3,720 60 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $52.00/1'.-f. 3,120 80 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 12" RCP Storm sewer @ $120.00/l.f. 9,600 5 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 4,750 30 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,800 1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $900.00/each 900 2 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 800 20 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/L.S. 1,500 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 3 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Ac. 3,000 1,160 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,160 Total $64,890 +5% Contingencies 3,240 $68,130 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 20,440 I[] TOTAL POND AP -493 AP -25 TO EXISTING 24" RCP ........ $88,570 Page 8. 2311d /o fy ® APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL POND AP -50, AP -49, 6 AP -25 OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMRPOVEMENT PROJECT NO. 452 A.) TRUNK AREA Parcel Area Credit Description (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) SW 1/4, SECTION 29 Parcel 012-50 1,382,000 Pond 295,000 Street 20% SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 NE 1/4, SECTION 31 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 011-03 898.,240 Pond 16,000 Street 20% Assessable Total Area Rate/s.f. Assessment 869,600 $0.075 $,65,220 705,790 $0.050 $ 35,290 859,040 Street 20% 687,230 $0.050 $ 34,362 720,580 Street 20% 576,460 $0.075 43,235 TOTAL........................................... $178,107 B.) LATERAL - ALTERNATE B ONLY Parcel Description SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 Page 9. 2311d /199 Total Assessment $ 2,015 zm CEDAR J CLIFF I COMM,.PK. ADD. 0 U N RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL m 12" 012-76 RAHN PARK \`L POND AP -4 ALTERNATE A N 1 _ POND ANTICIPATED—j AP -50 FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT ALTERNATE 8 24 011-76 CLIFF ROAD I CO. RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 i SCALE IN FEET PONDS AP -50, AP -49, AND AP -25 OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMP, PROJECT NO. 452 EAGAN, MINNESOTA POND AP -25 BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ConsultingEngineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. Comm.49364 0 1000 2000 N 0 R T H I I CALE IN FEET y u -- -_. Qw O> cr a Y ¢. STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT AREA PONDS AP -50, AP -49, AND BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. AP -25 OUTLETS Consulting Engineers TRUNK STORM SEWER IMP. _ _ St. Paul, Minn. PROJECT NO. 452 Date:DEC., 1985 EAG. NO. EAGAN, MINNESOTA �/� ( Comm. 49364 — 4.444.4 a 4: 36 St., P—d,, d1 55113 /)Ae.r.: 612 - 636-4600 January 16, 1986 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert Re: Pond AP -50, AP -49 and AP -25 Outlets Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements - Project No. 452 Our File NO. 49364 Dear Tom, Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keilh A. Gordon. P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E R,,hardW Foser, P.E. Rohe" G. Schunichr, P.E Maevin L, S.,.ha, P.E. Donald C. Burkord,, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P E. Ted K. Field, P.E hh,hW T. Ramnronn. P,E. Roberr R. PJeff,,le,. P.E. DaWd O. Lasko.. PE Charles A. Er,,kmn leo M. Pawelsk, Harlon M. Ohoo Per your request I have evaluated two alternate alignments for the trunk storm sewer proposed as part of the above project. Attached is a drawing which ® shows the two alternate alignments designated as Alternate C and D. Both Al- ternate C and D are a continuation of Alternate B presented in the preliminary report. Alternate C is located within a future street right-of-way which is contingent on development. Alternate D is located adjacent to the north line of the unplatted parcel and not in the park. However, as Alternate D contin- ues north along Rahn Road its location would be such that the existing side- walk along Rahn Road would not be disturbed. Therefore, the storm sewer alignment would be included within a portion of the park. Alternate D would also require a significant amount of tree removal due to the number of trees located along its alignment and the depth of sewer (20'-35' deep). ,Listed below is a cost comparison of the 4 alternates including Alternate A 5 B presented in the preliminary report: OBo G. Bnnes"M P.E. p Ri.h,,, W. Rome, P.E. lnsenh C Anderlik, P.E. to AP -25 Bmellorrl A. Lemh,,. P.E. Rhhmd E Torn,,, P.E. to Ex. 24" Jumer C. Ohnn, P.E. Re: Pond AP -50, AP -49 and AP -25 Outlets Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements - Project No. 452 Our File NO. 49364 Dear Tom, Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keilh A. Gordon. P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E R,,hardW Foser, P.E. Rohe" G. Schunichr, P.E Maevin L, S.,.ha, P.E. Donald C. Burkord,, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P E. Ted K. Field, P.E hh,hW T. Ramnronn. P,E. Roberr R. PJeff,,le,. P.E. DaWd O. Lasko.. PE Charles A. Er,,kmn leo M. Pawelsk, Harlon M. Ohoo Per your request I have evaluated two alternate alignments for the trunk storm sewer proposed as part of the above project. Attached is a drawing which ® shows the two alternate alignments designated as Alternate C and D. Both Al- ternate C and D are a continuation of Alternate B presented in the preliminary report. Alternate C is located within a future street right-of-way which is contingent on development. Alternate D is located adjacent to the north line of the unplatted parcel and not in the park. However, as Alternate D contin- ues north along Rahn Road its location would be such that the existing side- walk along Rahn Road would not be disturbed. Therefore, the storm sewer alignment would be included within a portion of the park. Alternate D would also require a significant amount of tree removal due to the number of trees located along its alignment and the depth of sewer (20'-35' deep). ,Listed below is a cost comparison of the 4 alternates including Alternate A 5 B presented in the preliminary report: Page 1. 2944d // 'J Pond AP -49 Pond AP -50 Pond AP -50 to AP -25 to AP -49 to AP -25 to Ex. 24" Total Alternate A 84,920 -- 88,570 173,490 Alternate B 96,170 -- 88,570 184,740 Alternate C -- 168,440 88,570 257,010 Alternate D 159,550(1) -- 88,570 248,120 (1) Pipe connects to pipe from Pond AP -49 to AP -25 As noted, Alternate C and D are approximately $70,000 higher than Alternate A ® and B. However, if for Pond AP -49 may Alternate A or B are not to be never be required assuming this considered, then an portion of park is outlet never developed. Therefore, the line from Pond AP -49 to the 24" line from Pond Page 1. 2944d // 'J • City of Eagan January 16, 1986 Eagan, MN 55121 Re: File No. 49364 AP -25 would not be required. The estimated cost of this line and the over - depth associated with the 24" RCP is $50,200. Therefore, the total cost of Alternate C could be reduced by $50,200 while the total cost for Alternate D could be reduced by $43,400. The cost reduction for Alternate D is less due to the additional cost associated with crossing Rahn Road. As previously noted, Alternate D initially proposed to discharge into the line on the west side of Rahn Road. As a result, if the line from Pond AP -49 is not construc- ted then Alternate D would have to cross Rahn Road on its own. In summary, if an outlet for Pond AP -49 is not required, then Alternate C and D are approximately $25,000 higher than Alternate A and B. It should also be noted that the alignment for Alternate C may generate a lateral benefit as- sessment some time in the future since,jt is anticipated a future storm sewer from this intersection to Pond AP -25 will be required. In addition, if it's determined an outlet for Pond AP -49 is never required, it is still recommended the 24" line from Pond AP -25 to the existing 24" be con- structed at a proper elevation to provide an outlet for Pond AP -49, if it is ever desired. The estimated cost for this overdepth is $5,000. • If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li cc: Ken Vraa RWR ® Page 2. - 2944d 113 r RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C3 EX. 12' 012-76 RAHN PARK ALTERNATE A POND �V AP -50 I I 1 I � 24'I' I CLIFF ROAD �. \2 \`Z 12 ALTERNATE D ALTERNATE C ANTICIPATED FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT -ALTERNATE B 011-76. CO. RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 SCALE IN FEET PONDS AP -50. AP-49,.AND AP -25 OUTLETS ....... . TRUNK STORM. SEWER IMP_ PROJECT NO. 452 EAGAN, MINNESOTA R POND AP -25 0 o: BONESTROO. ROSENE..ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting, Engineers_ St. Paul, Minn. . Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. Comm.49364 I C:C. CEDAR J COMM. CLIFF CO MM. PK. ADD. F~- ADD. O 2 O N RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C3 EX. 12' 012-76 RAHN PARK ALTERNATE A POND �V AP -50 I I 1 I � 24'I' I CLIFF ROAD �. \2 \`Z 12 ALTERNATE D ALTERNATE C ANTICIPATED FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT -ALTERNATE B 011-76. CO. RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 SCALE IN FEET PONDS AP -50. AP-49,.AND AP -25 OUTLETS ....... . TRUNK STORM. SEWER IMP_ PROJECT NO. 452 EAGAN, MINNESOTA R POND AP -25 0 o: BONESTROO. ROSENE..ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting, Engineers_ St. Paul, Minn. . Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. Comm.49364 Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT/BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION E. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Tollefson Builders, Inc., (Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition) --We have received a petition to vacate a portion of an existing ten -foot, side -lot line drainage and utility easement due to an approximate three-foot encroachment by the recent construction of the single-family dwelling on this property. In reviewing this petition, the staff has considerable reservations in approving this vacation due to the depth and location of their recently constructed sanitary sewer line within this side -lot line easement. In discussion with the proposed future homeowner and Tollefson Builders, Inc., the City Attorney and Public Works Director felt it would be in the City's best interest to require a hold harmless agreement to be executed by all three parties to limit the City's potential future liability that may be associated with damage to this dwelling unit resulting from settlement of the backfill material within this utility easement. 'teQo a he petition to vacate this easement on January the Council scheduled the public hearing for February 4 with the understanding that this agreement would be executed by all • appropriate parties as a condition of favorable approval.'., As of this date, the staff has received information indicating the homeowner will not execute this agreement. Therefore, the staff is recommending that this vacation not be approved at the time of the public hearing. All other notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies with no other objections received to date. Enclosed on page is a survey showing the relationship of the house to t e easement, property line and sanitary sewer alignment. . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of the utility easement as described' over Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition. 115 I ■ �1 30� L NORTH 7 SCALE 1"-30 N I sN r4 13 14 city of eagan standard PUBLIC SRITANY ADD. approved: plate WORKS -. Lc7r S $ - DEPARTMEN • ke -- . is Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT/WILDERNESS RUN '5TH ADDITION F. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Wilderness Run 5th Addition) --On January 7th, the Council received a petition requesting the vacation of common lot line drainage and utility easements over Lot 13, Block 6, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, of the Wilderness Run 5th Addition which were subsequently replatted into Lots 1, 2 and 3, and City parkland in Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, of Wilderness Run 6th Addition. When these lots were replatted, the underlying common lot line drainage and utility easements were never formally vacated. Subsequently, they show up on the newly -created lots in property description and title searches. All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utilities informing them of this proposed vacation. As of this date, no objections have been received and it is r-ecommen ed that it be given favorable consideration. Enclosed on page is a map and description of the proposed easement vacation.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of common lot line drainage and utility easements over portions of Block 6 and 7 of Wilderness Run 5th Addition. O _ _ - • [3-:5 i - 101.81 �� o rvq o _ ,ori I 10tg1 '� o v/ m� o Ei 1 g I I 3 -- _ 14627 /� I'a 12 1 a 1- NO°23.56.. W,_ -� w ../' � _-N9°n'S5' _ P V : 0 3 0 I- t•I_5 �t, `d rvp N o 7.g o 2 11 I L -_-136.23--J im v -7 �.1` r--NO°2356"W-� m m:v,'----N6'28'20"f n m \ 43!17 /O 1 N-ra' P gH 159.52 o 9. 0 1O 488.67 a__ $000 V _j / I :T,� o o P itf i l • O 2e • / P. N A I1 5 y / \ f 9ve / ! /•" \ 9000 /� B\/ _ 0 104.09 ' a °' _ -' N6°28.02.. rR r '26°39'2x'• o •A I.. E -� o 0 �` X80. O i 1 Q O _ 432.17_ _ J/ 00\ -539 24'• A C W l/ 638 / 3.72 118.04 O I P m 7 wO /a 0/0�oy,'I '0430oi 1127 63850/O L A , _ -\0M1�14049- 0 .0=371.49ef0/ , \� A_ I7O. OO -- 11 2 W- I O A, O / L-,.NTe 2P 23 5& i / J 1 t I m � - 135.08- J j 'Itd / n m I 300. 30 176 59 _ 8^ N7° �-•1 _ L_ i„ ' \- m M J LQ 5318" E -127.32_ 0 I- 'O� _ .,�� 0 1 �,��% nnry;i lr 11J' J - - W N d II ea / en r ' P 111.69. a h V 0 to F.,In Oo I rCF(i.i. SJ an cv 1':ILL'/tl14.11 a�i Aa 843 1 '1 o iOD 'L //�� c '1 L�C_IS°28'31•• �'=I•. I,I / ` , L.i G {.204.79 , A,= 7°37 38" _- J '1 .. Ui G.BPNO°0944 W R=424.71 /M-3 L LAKE +l(vll C /00 q �• n, a^' 59.19 ■ yfl'h`�e °� .�■ R= 372.12 f _C B N 9005'40"E ■ Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT/NORTHVIEW MEADOWS ADDITION G. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview Meadows Addition) --We have received a petition to vacate the common lot line drainage and utility easements shared by Lots 1,, 2, 3, 4 and 5, of Block 4, of Northview Meadows Addition. This request results from the developers desire to consolidate these five lots into three larger lots through either a replatting or a revision to the originally approved plat which will be discussed later on this agenda. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies. We have received a response from Dakota Electric indicating their concerns pertaining to the easements adjacent to public right-of-way for all five lots.. If this requested vacation is approved, it should be subject to the condition that adequate and drainage and utility easements be rededicated over the newly approved lot lines prior to the .filing of the vacation order at the County. is a• map showing the location of the ease- ments requested to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the requested drainage and utility easements subject to a rededication of all required drainage and utility easements. i�9 �._ F!e arc r�-questin- to vacate all of the esistin Qrainae and utility easements '::itSin the following described lots: Lot .1, 2; 3, and o, Dloc'.: .102T:a'I '. ., ADOIdS, accordin- to ae record --d plat thereof, Dakota County, 71innesota. e psi PE p 0 °0 i� \fs� / g o i \\I I 19, 69, 0.000.00 : g.. DRAWACE AND UTILITY <)I D• I <)I0 g �� EASEM£NT5 ARE SHOWN THUS:Zo•a000, y e oo 18"E S ^ 0�ti< �� 1 ` ---w� -� r--��----- P� g�j9F 0 OOpti 0� \ !� --60.0 r, S/5 �, moo•. \ a��46 being S�eelin width, unless otherwise °� a5 E \ , D , --I 000,418 indlcaled, and ad�a,n;n¢ /o/ lints, as a �h oti a; b c \ �2a, shown and 10,ew In wr and o&ininJQ Q s \jr slree/ lines, or shown on /he o% iy CI N o �.J' hj�'A 16. /^ % X.. o_ F \� ; 0 17 ��\ _.; Vit, 7__ 426-1 �8\. .. LIIL��m 46 5 // ab jo- 4)Eq3 ,. \/�--L�� II1H 37•o0 o30 30 ca�ti 3 kfcl .✓O.01 47 ✓0.00 : ' d = 29'00 � ' % -<`� / v / h o °367 /8SD +i' •• / / C° r,�, (,yr 2. < l / _ �' \� O� • EFS / / \ orl�o° �ti\/ // \!s 3A •` .,j�-C V.. No°oi 49 E - 50 .6�21 )pq / 22�i 23 \44 11 .............. DFmores EsEmEr rr To BC VACA E> 1 100 200 14 1 b 115 1 w' .16 3 17 v /ZU 60_¢0 X60.00 I.. 6a.00 j 160.00 i m lI 1¢ SaAV 319 °367 /8SD +i' •• / / C° r,�, (,yr 2. < l / _ �' \� O� • EFS / / \ orl�o° �ti\/ // \!s 3A •` .,j�-C V.. No°oi 49 E - 50 .6�21 )pq / 22�i 23 \44 11 .............. DFmores EsEmEr rr To BC VACA E> 00 0 100 200 l SCALE /N FEET 3 /ZU ® Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen 0 VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/BLUE GENTIAN ROAD H. Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian Road) --This public hearing to vacate this public right-of- way was continued from the January 7, 198'6, City Council, meeting, due to an error in the description published for the required legal notification. In reviewing the description that was sub- sequently republished for this item, another error was discovered which precipitates the necessity to again continue this item until the February 18th meeting to insure that this vacation can be properly recorded at Dakota County,. Therefore, no discus- sion pertaining to the actual vacation will be provided by staff unless specifically requested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing to vacate public right-of-way for Blue Gentian Road until February 18, 1986. /Z/ .0 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty CONTINUED FINAL ASSMT HEARING/MISCELLANEOUS APPEALS. I. Continued Final Assessment Hearing - Miscellaneous Appeals --At the November 19, 1985, Council meeting, the City Council reviewed the final assessments for several property owners who had submitted objections at the original September 17 final assessment hearing. At that time, they referred these appeals and objections to the Special Assessment Committee which met on January 16. As a result of the Special Assessment Committee review and recommendations, these final assessment hearings for these appellant property owners had been continued to the February 4 Council meeting for final review and determination by City Council. The following is a list of those property owners and their related assessments:. PROPERTY/OWNER PROJECT Don Vogtman 411 Lot 7 & N' Lot 6, Trunk Area Skovdale Addn. Storm Sewer ----------------------------------- Victor Staff 411 Lot 5, Skovdale Addn. Trunk Area Storm Sewer ----------------------------------- ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT $3,455.15 PROPOSED REVISED ASSESSMENT $1,485.00 • ---------------------------- •) $2,970.00 $2,227.59 Ronald Doyle 411 $3,712.50 Deleted 10-02200-011-86 Trunk Area from Project Storm Sewer ------------------------------------------------------------------ Lillian McCarthy 411 $2,970.00 No Change 10-02200-010-02 Trunk Area Storm Sewer. -------------------------------------------------------------------- The referenced revisions to the original proposed final assessments are based. on detailed review and subsequent recommendations of the Special _Assessment Committee which are being presented to the Council for their formal ratification and adoption. However, it is recommended that the continued final assessment for Lillian McCarthy be continued until the February 18 meeting to. allow renotification.of that property owner due to anticipated continued objections. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and adopt the final assessments for the first three property owners and to continue the public hearing for the fourth property owner (Lillian McCarthy) to the February 18, 1986, Council meeting. • • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-one PARK CONSULTANT/APPOINTMENT & FEE SCHEDULE A. Park Consultant Appointment & Fee Schedule Consideration— TheDirector of Parks & Recreation has contacted Tim Erkkila, formerly of Erkkila & Associates, and now a principal with Westwood Planning, concerning his reappointment in the 19'86 fee schedule. Parks & Recreation Director Vraa has contacted Mr. Erkkila asking that additional information be provided and, more specifically, reviews the consulting arrangement and fee schedule to be offered' by his firm. A copy of that letter is enclosed on page (s) 2 /y vim. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter that was referenced at t e 'last City Council meeting that was received by the Director of Parks & Recreation February 1, 1985, that announced Mr.. Erkkila's merger with Westwood Planning. Please refer to page-ZZ/,7-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the appointment of Westwood Planning & Engineering Company/Principal of Tim Erkkila, as the City's park consultant and, further, the fee schedule as presented for that consulting service for 1986.. /z 3 r] • WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY ,I-`A.i 4 tq* January 9, 1986 Honorable Mayor & City Council Members % Ms. Holly Duffy City Administrative Offices 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Consultant - Park Planner - 1986 Fee Schedule Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Thank you for reminding me to forward my 1986 hourly fee proposal. You will notice that we.are using a May 1984 schedule (attached). We shall honor it thoughout all of the calendar year 1986. This charge rate is an increase from our 1985 arrangement which was though Erkkila & Associates but honored by Westwood Planning & Engineering Company (since Erkkila merged with Westwood just days after submitting its hourly schedule to the City). The greatest change is in Principal Planner/Landscape Architect (my time). Associate Landscape Architect will be $28.50/hr. This is only slightly higher than the previous hourly charge ($25.00/hr.) and the bulk of our charges are logged by this type of employee. We look forward to working with the City again this year. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY Tim Erkkila, ASLA Vice President of Planning TE: pan cc: Ken Vraa Attachment 7415 WAYZATA BOIILEVAHD, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (51 2) 54G0155 7ST# / s C7 WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY FEF. SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES May 1, 1984 In general, where it is possible to determine in advance the Scope of a Project and the time and effort the Project will require, the fee basis for Engineering Services will be a percentage of construction cost of lump sum. Where it is impossible... because of the complex nature of work task:: that are -;ar-iabl^_ 1.n reture and where the time required is controlled by the Client, citizen involvement, environmental problems and, in general, where the time requirement is beyond the control of. the Consultant... the following fee schedule will apply. Classification Principal Engineer ....................................... 54.00 Principal Planner .............::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 54.00 Principal Landscape Architect. 54.00 Engineer ................................................. 42.00 Senior Planner .................... 42.00 Senior Landscape Architect ............................... 42.00 Associate Planner or Landscape Architect ................. 28.50 Senior Construction Coordinator .......................... 40.00 Senior Engineering, Technician 6 Construction Observer.... 34.00 Engineering Technician ................................... 28.50 Draftsman ................................................ 22.00 Typist ................................................... 15.00 Two—Man Survey Crew ...................................... 61.00 Three—Man Survey Crew .................................... 73.00 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 546-0155/ 5 February 1, 1985 Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Park and Recreation,�G�� City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road A OUT Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Ken: I have a special announcement for you. I am now the Director of Planning for Westwood Planning & Engineering. This merger happened very suddenly. I hoped to tell you personally but word is "leaking out" faster than I can schedule our meeting. Effective immediately all work which I was involved with for you as • Erkkila & Associates will be done in my.new office. My employees (Gordy and Anne) will continue working for me in the new offices at Westwood. Westwood shall honor all contracts and existing work arrangements of Erkkila & Associates. Eventually you will not receive letters, invoices or anything from me as Erkkila & Associates, but only as ,Westwood Planning & Engineering Company. I am very pleased with this change in business. We will have a greater ability to respond to your needs. I have a total of five (5) planners and landscape architects, plus civil engineers to bring in on projects. I plan to continue serving you in the same way; if not in better ways in the future. You should start using the following address and phone number to contact me: WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY 7415 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 (612) 546-0155 The office move has already occurred so no disruption of your service is expected. Communications via my previous phone number or address are being forwarded. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, w Tim Erkkila, ASLA ERKKILA & ASSOCIATES Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council i-;eeting Page Twenty-two AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS B. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Airport Noise Committee --At the City's organizational meeting that. was held on January 21, 1986, a determination was made that the Airport Noise Committee would consist of seven (7) members of which three (3) members will serve a one-year term and four will serve two-year terms. Since this Committee' is a special ad hoc Committee and not a formal Commission, members of the City Council expressed a desire to contact residents who might be interested in serving as members of the Committee. Those members of the Committee seeking continued appointment are Tom Baker, John Gustin, Carolyn Braun, Carol Pozois, and Joe Harrison. Those persons seekinq appointment er, who has. attended several meetings and resides at 2970 nide Avenue., Brad Farnumand Mike Beard who have � submitted letters attached on pages �l?e and Z22—i and W. Dustin • Mirich. City Councilmembers should contact/ any individuals they feel m'ig'ht be interested in serving on the Airport Noise Committee for the one or two vacant seats in order that formal appointments can be made on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM To to a_ one-year term and four to a two-year Noise Committee total of seven members. Q� 1 appoint three term to the members ., _Y� � 'I �N © TA o �.\.\ )1_1� 11\ 0 • •. .,W.Toj% He•Dac-5 PES rxv - 14mPGEfp Sii7 UKc -M /IP�Y Fol coAapte SIOAJ10 i,,ylcrl ,,n5 A.7uL7Q- ris,Xa A&AWHrLY iA) r•:m 6dGA'- NewS'We-%5- 7-,,14wK 5 4 fy. `,,Sv7 I'te • January 16, 1986 Ms. Beatta Blomqulst Mayor 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: EAGAN AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE Dear Ms. Blomquist: I would appreciate it if you consider this letter my application for committee membership to the Airport Noise Committee. I reside at 4305 Orion Lane and have lived In Eagan almost two years. I have a fairly extensive background in local government and have served on several metro wide boards. I have followed the airport noise Issue fairly closely In the newspapers and have been talking and meeting with Tom.Hedges and Jon Hoeinstein about its implications for Eagan. I am extremely angered by the noise we are experiencing over our home and I am willing to contribute my time, energy and Ideas to my community. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at my home 452-0980 or at work 224-1500. Thank you for your consideration of my application. BF/eh /7 Sincerely, 4i�� Brad Farnham Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-three ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT APPOINTMENTS C.. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Economic Development Commission --It was determined at the January 21 organizational meeting that a term of service would not be established for the Economic Development Commission. All members serve at the will of the City Council's appointment and it was determined that, typically, reappointments would be made when a member resigns, misses three meetings without a reasonable excuse or the City Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to remove that individual. Appointments are required for three (3) positions on the Commission. The Plant Manager/Industrial Owner position has been vacated by John McCall, who is experiencing a transfer at Economics Laboratory. The second position is Real Estate Profession where Mark Parranto served as the Commis- sion's representative and did formally resign during the fall of 1985. Thirdly, Local Media was represented by Edna Street, who has attended a meeting during 1985 and apparently has -the community. For additional information on the original makeup of the local government designation of the Eagan Economic Development Commission, please refer to a three • (3) page document that was adopted by the City Council at tte December 6, 1983, meeting. Please reference pages /3/ through 33 The City Administrator was direc�c5 cu uo:cacC certain individuals who made application for the Planning Commission wlo might be interested in serving as a member of this Commission. Bob Shields, who is a real estate manager for Coldwell Banker in Apple Valley, has been contacted and is veru interested in the. Real Estate Profession appointment. George Traynor, wrio is president of Courseware Applications, is also very interested in seeking an appointment as the Plant Manager/Industrial Owner category. Mr. John King, who has a media in communications background and applied for the Cable Commission, is interested in serving 'as the Economic Development Commission's Local Media representative. All three (3) of these persons were contacted during the past wee!, and, as stated, would like to be considered for an appointment. It was clearly stated to these individuals that members of the City Council might have other individuals they would like to consider and, in any event, the appointments would be given consideration at thc_ Fchruary 4 City Counc: meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny appoint- ments to the Economic Development Commission. /30 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The Eagan City Council created an Economic Development Com- mission on December 6, 1983 to create and implement an economic development master plan for the community. Attached is a copy of the minutes of that meeting. This Commission is represented by the following persons: A regular meeting date, the first Wednesday of each month at 12:00 noon, is the time and day the Eagan Economic Development Commission meets at the Municipal Center building.. The Commission has standing Committees consisting of the following: 1. Economic Development & Community Assessment 2. Public Relations 3. Labor Distribution & Industrial Call A. Executive /3 2-1. 1. Plant Manager/Industrial Owner: John McCall 2. Financial Profession: Dick Stevenson 3. Real Estate Profession: Mark Parranto 4. Local Media: Edna Street 5. Local Utility Service: Roger Lee 6. Local Retail Trades: Larry Krannig 7. City Government Service: Tom Hedges 8. City Service Area: David Kleimola 9. Ad Hoc: Larry Wenzel, as Immediate Past President of the Chamber of Commerce A regular meeting date, the first Wednesday of each month at 12:00 noon, is the time and day the Eagan Economic Development Commission meets at the Municipal Center building.. The Commission has standing Committees consisting of the following: 1. Economic Development & Community Assessment 2. Public Relations 3. Labor Distribution & Industrial Call A. Executive /3 2-1. • The Commission receives a yearly budgetary allocation from the Eagan City Council. Staff support is provided from the City of Eagan through the office of the City Administrator. In addition to the City Ad- ministrator's office, the Department of Planning is also availa- ble to the Economic Development Commission to meet with pro- spective new industry and process any graphics and reports re- garding community development as requested by the Commission. The Mayor and two members of the City Council participate as ad hoc members of the Commission on a regular basis. 0 ATTENDANCE AT STAR CITY CONFERENCE Representatives of the Economic Development Commission participated in the 1984 Star City Conference which was held on May 16 and May 17, 1984. Those in attendance for the entire conference were the Commission's Chairman Larry Wenzel, Vice - Chairman Roger Lee and Commission member Thomas Hedges. Also attending a portion of the conference were Commission members Richard Stevenson, Edna Street and David Kleimola. City Adminis- trative staff designated to the Economic Development/Star City project Holly Duffy and Ed Meister were also in attendance at one or two special sessions pertaining to various committee work they were coordinating for the Star City designation. /3v 2-2 I❑ L The knowledge gained at the Star City's conference was the most important ingredient for completing the Star City designation and also for establishing criteria for an ongoing Economic Development Commission. The City will support future Star City conferences by providing attendance and participation in the various seminars that are offered through that forum. Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meetingk Page Twenty-four GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMIS N D.. Appointments to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commis- sion --At the last regular City Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare additional information regarding the responsibilities of Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission members. The City of Eagan is responsible for the appointment of three members to that watershed management group. It is recommended that the Director of Public Works be one of those appointments. According to recent state legislation, each community within the metropolitan area was required to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement establishing a Watershed Management Organization (WMO). This Joint Powers Agreement provided for the establishment of a Commission to manage the affairs of this WMO. The makeup of this Commission is to consist of three representatives from the City of Eagan and two representatives each from Mendota. -Hei hts river Grove Heights. This seven -member Commission its capacity through the establishment and adoption of the WMO`s management plan after which Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights would withdraw one member each, leaving a five -member Commission to manage the ongoing affairs of the WMO. The purpose of this WMO is to provide an organization to preserve and use the natural water storage and retention of the Gun Club Lake Watershed to: a. Reduce to the greatest practical extent capital expenditures necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of runoff. b. Improve water quality. C. Prevent flooding and erosion from surface flows. d. Promote ground water recharge. e. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities. f. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper manage- ment of surface water. g. Carry out- all the duties and responsibilities outlined in Minnesota Statutes 473,.875 through 473.883. Other than the Director of Public Works, the staff does not have any other recommendations. -for representatives to this Commis- sion. It is anticipated that the Commission will meet monthly until the WMO's operational and management plan has been completed and, thereafter, 2-3 times a year for organizational business (i.e. budget, capital improvement, permit issuance, etc.) �3 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 198.6,: City Council Meeting Page Twenty-five, The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss in further detail the purpose and responsibilities of the WMO to help the Council arrive at proper representative appointments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint three members to represent the City of Eagan to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization,. 0 z ® Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting n \rD R Page Twenty-six �� y`� c 451 000 SPERRY PROPOSAL e,c`'`�00 pp i E. Sperry Proposal for New Marketing and Sales Facility --The Sperry Corporation has notified the City of Eagan that it isle° one of several locations being considered a new marketing and o- Qf"N sales facility. All other sites are located outside the State of Minnesota. City Councilmembers are discussing a number of� O tangible and other incentives for use in the City's proposal in hopes that the Sperry Corporation will select Eagan as a oO site for a new marketing and sales facility. The City Administrator will further discuss the proposal at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Any formal action will,ik depend on further development of the proposal prior to the City1 Council meeting. /lam kY, u O " USE PERMIT/HONG WONG RESTAURANT ON -SALE R F. Reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit for Hong Wong • Restaurant to Allow On -Sale Liquor License --At the last regular City. Council meeting, a motion was approved denying a conditional use permit for Hong Wong Restaurant to allow an on -sale liquor license. The applicant has contacted almost all of the neighbors adjacent to the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center and those contacted have signed a petition stating they have no objection regarding the on -sale liquor license application as submitted by Hong Wong Restaurant. Copies of those petitions are enclosed on. pages -3 through_. For another copy of the City Planner's report and action taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to that report and minutes found on pages /03 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) A motion for reconsider- ation- of this agenda item is required before the conditional use permit application can be further considered. 2)If the motion for reconsideration is approved, then action is in order to approve or deny the conditional use permit to allow - Hong Wong Restaurant an on -sale liquor license.. IkP 9P .HCl TO THE CITY COUNSIL OF EAGAN WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE NEIGHBORS/RESIDENTS OF HONG WONG RESTAURANT ( 2139 CLIFF ROAD, EAGANI) AT CIDAR/ CLIFF SHOPPING CENTER. WE HAVE NO OBJECTION ABOUT THEIR APPLICATION FOR THE ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE( SERVICE BAR ONLY). ADDRESS C00% 0 M( It coo" Pk / 16Lk a�33 C�L� Rd. ,1/,5 0-4- '4 U Lot b L lz � /. Lot 9� fSLK t' ✓ / >�IZ.01-10 MCA pp %0C* eppfa cra PAfz C wwWGr -1- 137 Lot S 13LIC2 `crr,V :.111 +1 [ .+moi c— ;::� (v BLIc 2 rLo}Ir r' d -b; :�:XC If -1 Left 800 ,4� . 4d' i11^ ' 1 `_)- l Z ✓ �� 1 ! c �%UJi2 gLK3 Oji+- ,/- L) - �C I . -1- 137 • • CONT. P.1 NAME ADDRESS DATE L04- Z, !3[KS �• �/3:,; %�,�,`;�,lVii/ Laf Sj soe- Lod-B S i f 25 8(, BckS�/ Bcic ✓ �. . Loi -N=- [SLOG92, -�� $art Loi- 07t SLlc.1'I _- Loi b/L OcK2 LO -4- . 40 S/�j/Cf SC�i T Tcaj 04() rsLI' - 2 - f• -- 94, • TO THE CITY COUNSIL OF EAGAN WE THE; UiVDERSIGNED — WOULD LIKE TO SEZ THAT HONG WONG RESTAURANT (2139 CLIFF ROAD, EAGAN) AT CEDARCLIFF SHOPPING CENTER GET TTHEIR ON SALES LIQUOR LICENSE (SERVICE BAR ONLY) AND START SERVING LIQUOR IN THE NEAR FUTURE. NAME ADDRESS DATE i c /'1%/mac7 ; 2 5- /-aS-L6 c.� I • CONT. P. NA il'13� / J 0 LJ Q ? 4�-4s�P& ,(?Yl ". ca.,IS�, 733 4�sz) / Se �,6: /—/—%f,e- /A -P S -L/-D/(14N- c4�—�OV7 y Ali - /— J- S �� 44,20 si P�Q i `�,o- / At E %� 0 CONT. F._9 NAP,9E ADDRESS J DATE 4ZJ�� �� Jo�S. P/fPii r K/I �Vy CONT. F.* NAME ADDRESS DATE a 5,�D v 9/xc • /�v Agenda Information Memo ®, February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-seven Cl 0 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR HONG WONG RESTAURANT G. On -Sale Liquor License for Hong Wong Restaurant - Cedar Cliff Shopping Center --The on -sane liquor license for Hong Wong Restaurant will be given consideration if the conditional use permit allowing an on -sale liquor license is granted. There were questions raised at the last City Council meeting regarding a recent codification of liquor license policies that occurred with the new City Code. According to the City Clerk"s office, the original li uor license policy, a copy is enclosed on pages % /!1through, was incorporated into the new City Code. The Director of Finance has prepared a memo that provides a cross-reference between the policies and the City Code, enclosed on page for your reference. The Hong Wong Restaurant appears to meet 11 the criteria with the exception of the appraised value. According to the liquor license policies adopted in the City Code, "No on -sale liquor license shall be allowed for any establishment unless the investment in the building or portion of the building associated with the liquor license is equal to or greater than $200,000." The City has researched the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center square footage and estimated building valuation. The square footage of the center is 37,900 square feet while the restaurant is 2,660 square feet_ Therefore, the restaurant represents approximately 7% of the building. The total building valuation is approximately $1,7.05,500 and 7% of the total building valuation is $120,000. This information is based on discussion between the City Clerk's office and the County Assessor's office. If it is the City Council's intention to include fixtures and kitchen equipment, the valuation. in cost would' be considerably greater than the $120,000. A represen- tative of the applicant will bring a letter to the City Council meet- ing regarding the valuation of the building_ The Police Department has been conducted and they find no reason to deny the application. A copy of the .liquor license_ application is enclosed without page number for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an on -sale liquor license for Hong Wong Restaurant as presented. Special Note: A quick review of the petition indicates several signatures by residents from other communities and areas of Eagan that are not directly affected by the application. City staff will compare the list of signatures with the list of names on the abstract list to be included in the Administrative packet. CITY OF EACAN LIQUOR LICENSE POLICIES Adopted February 22, 1973 Amended September 21, 1976, December 19, 1979, January 3, 1980, March 4, 1980 and February 3, 1981. aiR OFF -SALE LIQUOR 1) Four off -sale liquor licenses shall be allowed at the present time in the City of Eagan. The City reserves the right to space liquor licenses in geographic commercial areas and not concentrate licenses in a single area. The following locations describe the geographic considerations: a) Two licenses shall be allowed in the general western area of the City (near Cedar Avenue and Highway 13). b) One license shall be allowed in the general northeastern area of the City. c) One license shall be allowed in the general south-central area of the City. 2) Off -sale licenses shall be limited to property zoned Commercial. ON -SALE LIQUOR 1) Number a) A total of twelve (12) on -sale liquor licenses shall be allowed at the present time. . 2) Value -(Note 1) a) No on -sale liquor license shall be allowed for any establishment unless the. investment in the building or portion of the building associated with the liquor license is equal to or greater than $200,000. In the event the on -sale liquor establishment is part of a larger building - containing other uses, the value shall be arrived at by prorating the value of the total building on a square footage basis. Value is to be determined on items considered by the County Assessor to be "real property", as differentiated from fixtures. /�7 3) Food Service (Note 1) G a) All establishments .which hold an "on -sale" liquor license must maintain a ratio of food sales to liquor sales of at least 40-60%. Such establishments shall file with the City at the end of each quarter a verified statement as to the food to liquor sales ratio. Failure to maintain the minimum ratio for any quarter is grounds for the City Council to determine that the license is in violation of the Eagan Liquor Ordinance No. 42 and also is grounds for revocation of the license. b) Food service must consist of a "reasonable" choice of, full meals, and shall not be. limited to "quick service" items such as pizza, sand- wiches, hamburgers, etc. 4) Location (Note 1) a) On -sale liquor licenses shall be limited to commercially or industrially zoned property, under a conditional use permit. 5) Exceptions a) Where the license requests are made for establishments which arean integral part of a motel or hotel of over 60 rooms, or -in which the • value of the building or portion of the building associated with the liquor license exceeds $500,000, special exemption from the limit of twelve (12) total on -sale liquor licenses may be granted.., General These policies shall be reviewed on a yearly basis. Note 1: On -sale establishments existing at the date of incorporation of Eagan as a Village are exempt from these requirements. /0 E • MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM. FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: JANUARY 27, 1986 SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE POLICIES The liquor license policies adopted February 22, 1973, and sub- sequently amended to the form as attached were incorporated into the City Code at the time of the ordinance codification. The following is a cross reference between the policies and the City Code. Policy Off -Sale Liquor 1) Geographic Boundaries 2) Commercial Property On -Sale Liquor 1) Number 2) Value Citv Code Page 113, Subd. 12 (This has been revised and will be modified with the next code update) Covered in zoning chapter - not men- tioned in liquor licensing chapter Page 113, Subd. 11 A restaurant is defined on pages 99-1 and 100 (definition number 17) and 3) Food Service A license may be granted to a res- taurant - Page 112, Subd. 10 4) Location A Hotel is defined on page 100 (definition number 18) and 5) Exceptions (Hotel) Page 113, Subd. 11 A copy of the policies is attached for reference. me know if you desire any additional information. Finan Director/City Clerk EJV/kf �� Please let • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Twenty-eight Memo City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/HARDEE''S RESTAURANT H. Conditional Use Permit for Hardee's Restaurant for a Drive Through Restaurant Facility and Pylon Sign --A conditional use permit for Hardee's Restaurant, to be located on Lot 1, Block 1, First Minnehaha Addition, was given consideration by the City Council at the December 17, 1985 meeting. There was a concern expressed by the City Council that stacking space on Krestwood Lane was not adequate and as a result, the plan should be revised. This item was to be considered at the January 21 meeting, however, after further review by staff it was determined the building did not satisfy setback requirements or contain the proper number of parking spaces. The developer has been asked to again review and revise the plan. A copy of the new plan and the City Planner's explanation is enclosed on pages /1-'/ through /j'Z for your review. For a copy of the original staff report and attachments, the original plan and pylon sign request, refer through 154- . • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve or deny the con- ditional use permit application for Hardee's Restaurant as presented. AI • MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 31, 1986 SUBJECT:' UPDATE ON HARDEE'S RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Hardee's have submitted several site plans for the City to review from the time it was continued at the December 17, 1985 City Council meet.ing. The last site plan had good circulation but could not meet the setbacks required from public right-of-ways. Therefore, the applicants have resubmitted a site plan showing basically the same configuration and layout as the first site plan that was submitted with the exception that the entrance to Hardee's, off of Krestwood, has been shifted from 60' to 100' from the intersection. I hope this will take care of the issue regarding the access point onto Krestwood La. The reason they are back to the original site plan is because shifting or changing the building would eliminate the number of parking stalls re- quired for this facility. The applicants are looking at approximat- ely 125 seats which would require in the neighborhood of 41 - 50 parking spaces. The parking shown should be adequate to handle the Hardee's Restaurant as well as the future facility to the ® south. The original conditions should be attached to the Condition- al Use Permit. Dale C. Runkle attachment 16/ 0 °° IL fL. Woo D ,I -- sem--� EriOF A?( bD ( P777771 S I w a �l I a �N F yon w ( d 1%. e E�IER kCK M77 I 0 01 NN?-? pw4 PAP 4 i ( rr 1- fI101- IKr'Ob P -P NZ N r�DI'4y�p PUGKWC2�P�IV$ X15 IS R l WT Wt PI -Ar►, Fop f'fvlfH 10117' . ll5 l of kT( .�A�f1jlA(i'( ?lii IgS6 �aFr� � � 4 �"' � p I S )fJ3 (Y1 L � .'� 1 � T( f.: YY I' '. t i hrvT�•y,. 1� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT:. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: HARDEES RESTAURANT (STANLEY SCHULTZ) LOCATION: NW; OF SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 'drive-thru' facility and pylon sign for a proposed Hardee's Restaurant east of Pilot Knob Rd and south of Duckwood Dr. CODE COMPLIANCE/SITE PLANNING: All building and parking setbacks meet City Code requirements. 82 parking stalls are provided • 80@ 10' x 20' and 2 @ 12' x 20'. The drive-thru area provides staking for 6 cars and additional space for another 5 cars along the south side of the building. The site plan indicates a future building pad only to demonstrate the ample size of this parcel, and the possibility of another building. Hardees will have two access points from Krestwood Lane, each being 25' wide and providing entrance/exit service. The drive area between the 20' parking stalls will be 25' and along with the 10' width stalls should provide safe, freely moving vehicular activity. The proposed sign location is approximately 20' from the property lines thus meeting City Code. The sign will be very similar to the approved sign at the Nicols Road Hardees. As with that . sign, a variance is.needed because the total sign area will be 143 S.F. per side due to the 32 S.F. appendage sign. City Code allows 125 S.F. per side. This appendage sign and the main 'Hardees' sign 111 S.F. are pre -manufactured with the next smallest sign being 50 S.F. If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The sign shall be at least 10' within the property line. 2) A variance shall be granted to allow a maximum 143 S.F. of sign area per side. 3) The sign shall be no taller than 27'. 4) The trash area be enclosed. 5) A landscape plan be submitted for Staff review before issuance �_r 1,r: - 15.E E3 ..p W " -/ a I�IL�II LILLI DP710 a� g� r � boanfior� 4 i Pi�oT r��op R� o o E�?FR fx FFPTFF I'l 3v — HARPir'sHt _� � ^� 20' 181 25' 20,1 ------�---- !���.--- _-Q(.._ z x22,39; 2 25' ZU790' l6' 5 Doi Glp � ti p IL I SZ To'fA� 51AL64 � 10' x 20' L @ IZ x7.0' a I�IL�II LILLI DP710 a� g� r � boanfior� 4 i Pi�oT r��op R� i Hardee's Model 616 road sign is the primary sign used for the main identification of the store. Iris usually installed at 16' to 20' grade clearance. A Breakfast/Drive Thru appendage sign is usually used. See appendage sign sheet. SPECIFICATIONS: SIZE: 7'2314' x 15'5' x 1'2518' AREA: 111.44 sp. It. WEIGHT: 1.025 lbs. ELECTRICAL: LOAD: 1 20 Amp, 120 Voll Circuit; 13.4 Amps Maximum LAMPS: F84T12 CWHO CITY 14 BALLAST: FRANCE 388 D 3 lamp OTY 2 FRANCE 488 D 4 lainp. OTY 2. SWITCH; 1 - 20 Amp (U LI Approved" MODEL 816 SIZE: 5'11/2" x 6'2' 'REA: 31.61 sq. ft. WEIGHT: 390 lbs. ELECTRICAL: - LOAD: 1-15 Ah'? 120 Volt Circuit -9.2 AMP %laximum LAMPS: F60T12C%JH0 Oty. 12 BALLAST: France 653D. 6 Lamp Oty. 2 SWITCH: 1.15 4f.:P0 City. 12 EAporoved • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986,..City Council Meeting Page Twenty-nine L J .10 VARIANCE/WESLEY CONSTRUCTION SUN CLIFF FIFTH ADDITION I. Variance for a Two (2) Foot Sideyard Setback for Wesley Construction, Lot 3, Block 2., Sun Cliff 5th Addition --At the last City Council meeting an application for a two (2) foot side yard variance for Lot 3, Block 2, Sun Cliff 5th Addition fronting on Fox Ridge Road, as requested by Wesley Construction Inc., was continued due to no representation by the appli nt. For a copy of the City Planner's report., refer to pages through /6/ . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance as requested by Wesley Construction Inc. • s 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIAPCE APPLICANT: WESLEY CONSTRUCTION INC LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, SUN CLIFF 5TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 21, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 14, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a 2' side yard variance for lot 3, block 2, Sun Cliff 5th Addition, routing on Fox Ridge Rd. COaU-iENTS: The foundation for this house is already completed. 4 2 side yard variance is needed because a "dwelling" area is a;:;vae the garage. The garage itself would have exceeded the C_'tl Code minimum setback of 5'. If the house would have been shifted to the east 21, then that dwelling side would not have iiet code requirements. The proposed setbacks will be 8' on the garage/house side and 11' on the typical dwelling unit side. The front and rear yard setbacks meet code requirements. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. W"*" C/91" FOR: WESLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC. O -h NOTE: — ` - 0 Denotes Wooden Stake Proposed Garage Floor E1.= 913.0 (912.7) Denotes Proposed Finished Ground El. ....*- Denotes Direction Of Surface Drainage Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929 .� /proincx3¢ n v. p EI Fox RI, C.111. WINDEN 3 ASSOCIATES, INC., LAND SURVEYORS Tal 645.3646 1361 EUSTIS SL, ST. PAUL, MINN. 66100 Scale: 1°=30' e Denotes Iron Monument Bearings Are Assumed G�521r•2nf Ne7° 2'5'45,'E 1911911. i9 t o 1 I Laep. 00 22.5 N n 13.5 N w 1 Proposed �+ , //Ouse 1 /L M M 3!! IAd:15 % 19i tV sea 21' 43" E rA Lot 3, Block 2, SUN CLIFF FIFTH ADDITION, Dakota,County, Minnesota. WE HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRISEO AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS, IF ANY. THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Doled thi°� ^ daY d ocit bet •A.O. Ives C. R. WINDEN 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. by .� Wesley Construction,inG Weatherby 944-7092 emR� Wesley Construction, Weatherby 944-7092 40 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty FISCAL 1985/BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENT A. Fiscal 1985, Budgetary Adjustment --Director of Finance Van Overbeke will have a list of budgetary adjustments ready for distribution as part of the Administrative Agenda on Monday. The total expenditures in the general fund, including the payroll accrual and miscellaneous other expenditures included on the 12-29-85 Operating Statement, will be approximately $5,144,000. This is approximately $22,360 over the approved budget after using the entire $147,540 contingency. The total revenues, as recorded in the 12-29-85 revenue report, are approximately $5,870.,000. Since the budget is $5,121,640 and interest earnings will add about $20,000 when rerecorded there will be a favorable revenue variance of approximately $770,000 for the year. The Director of Finance is recommending that the total budget be increased from $5,121,640 to $5,180,000 by showing a revenue estimate of $58,360 for cable television reimbursement. This would leave an unappropriated balance and a contingency of $36,000 and a favorable revenue variance of approximately $690,000. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny budgetary adjustments as recommended by the Finance Director and City Administrator. Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting. Page Thirty-one PRELIMINARY PLAT/HIGHVIEW ACRES B. Preliminary Plat for a Single Family Home in Hghview Acres for Remick Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission on December 19, 1985 and again on January 28, 1986 to consider applications that were submitted by Mark Remick for a preliminary plat consisting of one lot and containing 1.26 acres. After review by the Planning Commission at the December meeting, there was a question regarding the date and procedure in which the City outlot was acquired and further what the legal procedures would be regarding its sale. During the course of research the applicant proposed a land exchange instead of the outright purchasing of the outlot which became acceptable to both the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and the Advisory Planning Commission. For additional information on the item, refer to the staff report enclosed on pages through /6I the original report, an update eo sisti-ng of a new 'r e Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission's recom- mendation. This report is enclosed on pages through / 7/, '175 ` for your review. -'� I ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for a single family home in Highview Acres, Remick Addition. l63 MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 FROM: JIM STURM DATE: JANUARY 17, 1986 SUBJECT: REMICK ADDITION BACKGROUND: Mr. Mark Remick previously submitted an application requesting a preliminry plat consisting of one lot abutting the north property line of Highview Park. This item was continued until information as to how this City outlot was acquired and the legal procedures regarding its sale could be further researched. In the meantime, the applicant has proposed a land exchange instead of the outright purchasing of this outlot. Staff has reviewed this proposal and the Advisory Parks Commission endorsed it with the recommendations made by the Parks Dept. The City attor.ney's office has reviewed this option also and their conclusion is that no public hearing will be neq,uired for this type of land exchange (see attachments). SITE PLAN: • In exchange for the outlot, the City Park Department is requesting 35' along the eastern portion of the site and 2'5' along the southern property line. The eastern area is r,a,ther low and this area will be filled to give Highview Park a more usable activity area.. An additional 35' slope easement to soften the grading was approved by the applicant. Fill from the foundation excavation will be used in this low area. With the additional 25' to the south„ the 10% parkland dedication will have been met. 0 Staff has asked the. applicant to shift the house north so that there is a 25' minimumsetback to the park property line. This may be included in the conditions of the plat along with the access easement across John Remick's property to the north. This was approved by the applicant. The City Planning, Engineering and Park Departments all endorse this land exchange. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION - JIM STURM, ASST. PLANNER FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JANUARY 15, 1986 RE: PROPOSED REMICK ADDITION The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Remick Addition at its January 9 meeting. The Commission received an analysis report prepared by department staff concerning this proposed development. The report noted that the house would sit on top of a knoll resulting in a predominant visual consequence and impact upon the park. It was also noted that the parcel's east boundary abutts the park and is in a lowland area which has accumulated debris and at times, water. This area impacts the aesthetics of the park as well as its usability. It is noted that the developer has an interest in acquiring a City outlot of approximately 7,400 sq. ft. for access to this parcel. With this in mind, the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission is recommending that the City consider a "swap" of property. In exchange for the City outlot, the City would receive a parcel of approximately 35' in width along the east property line amounting to approximately 7,400 sq. ft. In addition, the City would require a land dedication amounting to approximately 5,500 sq. ft. along the south property line. This would be approximately 25' in width extending through the length of the plat. Further, Commission is recommending and requesting that the house be moved back an additional 25' from this new proposed south property • line. One final recommendation was also made by the Advisory Commission. This would provide for a slope easement on the east property line in order that the lowland area could be properly filled in and contours matched on the remaining property. In summation, the Advisory Commission is suggesting that a swap in property be made with this proposal for the City outlot and for a land dedication of the south property line.' Finally, that the house be moved back at least 25' from the proposed new south property line. As you are aware, City staff met with Mr. Remick on Monday, January 13, regarding the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendations. At this meeting, the proposal was explained to Mr. Remick who agreed to these recommendations. I have attached Figures 1 & 3 concerning the location of this parcel in relation to the park and the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendations. I will be available at your Planning Commission meeting scheduled for January 28 to respond to any questions regarding this item. Respectfully /;b'mitt , Director of Parks & Recreation CC: Dale .Runkle, City Planner /65 Tom Hedges, City Administrator HAUGE, EIDE & AELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 80122 _ PAUL H. HAUGE AREA CODE 612 KEVIN W. EIDE - TELEPHONE 494-4224 DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER January 9, 1986 Mr. Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Sale of Outlot 1, Valley View Plateau Plat No. 2 Dear Dale: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the statutory requirements for the City in regard to the sale or exchange.of the above-described lot to a Mr. Remick in order to provide access to his property to a public street, which would allow platting thereof and construction thereupon. Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.345 and 412.311 do not preclude a City Council from selling or conveying real estate belonging to the City. Several older Attorney General Opinions indicate that the City need not advertise for bids when selling the property. Minnesota Statute Section 412.211 authorizes the Council of any statutory city to acquire real property as for purposes as the City may require and to hold, manage, control, sell, convey, lease or otherwise dispose of such property as its interests require. This is ample authority for,.the City to dispose of land not held in trust for a specified public use. Apparently, the property in question was acquired by tax forfeiture in 1971 and thus is not being held by the City for park,right-of-way or any other type of easement. Thus, it does not appear necessary that any type of public hearing would be required to determine whether the public's best interest was being served. Our ,office has checked with the Dakota County Recorder's office to determine that this property was conveyed to the City by State Deed document #389410 on September 29, 1971. It appears that the dimensions of the property are 55.29 feet wide by 135.01 feet long. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely yours, MAUGE EIDE 6 KELLER, P.A. David G. Rel r DGK:ras Ah AV 0 - r it I N I a H v IIF IF A c I -El OW vrAr, HIGHVIEW PA • ' CITY OF EAGAN n U SUBJECT:. PRELIMINARY PLAT - REMICK ADDITION APPLICANT: MARK REMICK LOCATION: PART OF NE4 OF SEq OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat existing of 1.lot and containing 1.26 acres. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned R-1 residential single district and would allow only a detached single family dwelling. The Comprehensive Guide also designates this parcel as a R-1 single family district with a density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre. In review of this particular property, it is in an area that is developed at a very low density. To the north are existing single family homes. To the south and east is City park property and to the west undeveloped R-1 zoned property. The problem with this particular parcel is that it was created a number of years ago without any good public access being provided to the parcel. Therefore, the biggest concern the City has in creating this lot is to how best to provide public access or a street to this particular lot. _;_booking art the Mmt re ;meighborhood _there are a :number _nf-.streets or portions of streets which have been dedicated as sight -of -way euid have not been constructed at this time. Highridge Terrace :_.is stubbed: -to the :undeveloped property to -.the south and City easement then runs easterly which touches the corner of the plat ander consideration. The other road where a connection may or may not. be at this time is Skyline Drive. Presently, Skyline Drive is platted with a full right-of-way up to the west property line of Oster Addition then City park proPerty has a half right- of-way running along the southerly portion of the park property. The issue is in how _to create an overall circulation in this neighborhood and still try to provide public access to the proposed lot. There are 3 alternatives that are possible: 1) To require the applicant to plat a half right-of-way along the westerly portion of the parcel and dedicate it as public right-of-way in order that, street .connection could be made from Highridge Terrace to Skyline Drive. This would run along the westerly property line of lot 1, Remick Addition. Due tothe. topography and location of .this road engineering, -parks and planning .viewed .th.is..,alternate as not being the most feasible approach. / / p PRELIMINARY PLAT - REMICK ADDITION DECEMBER 19, 1985 • PAGE 2 2) To provide public access it would be necessary to look at the easement dedicated to the City and provide a cul-de-sac •• which then provides public access to the newly created lot. At this particular time this alternative seems to be the most feasible way to provide access to this property. 3) The ultimate design concept to provide overall circulation for the neighborhood is to continue Highridge-Terracedirectly south to Skyline Drive. This would be done at the time the De Losh property would develop and the connection would be made at a future date. ''It appears that the topography location to the properties, this connection makes the most sense to provide at a future date. This would allow the pedestrian circulation from the north to follow this road alignment and then easterly to the park. In reviewing this plat it was not the plat itself but the surround- ing conditions which made this difficult to analyze and provide recommendations. i GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant did not submit any grading plane for Staff review and comment. Staff does not foresee any in- surmountable problems resulting from grading with this development, however Staff cannot be certain without a grading plan to review. The site is quite well drained because it consists -of a -small knoll. Drainage appears to be westerly and easterly from the .high point located :approximately at .the :.center__Df::this -parcel. Because of its. adequate . drainage 'and small. size, 'Staff does not anticipate the need for any storm sewer for this' development. OTILITIES: ,'Sanitary sewer- and watermain are in place within =High Ridge Terrace. .2rhese_.mains, when -extended, have sufficient size, capacity and depth to provide --service to this development. Staff recommends both mains be ,extended southerly to the south end of .High Ridge Terrace and then easterly through the City owned 55' parcel south of lot 1 of Valley View Plateau No. 2. STREETS: This. proposed development has no public access to it. In order for this development to comply with the public access requirement, " Staff recommends the option of construction of a cul-de-sac off of Highridge Terrace. This would be a relatively short cul-de-sac, approximately 160' long. Figure 1 shows the other options that Thew -:Parks Department. feels that the option, street along the park would be detrimental to the Staff considered of _locating the park property. • PRELIMINARY PLAT - REMICK ADDITION DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 3 -High Ridge Terrace is a City street on which the City owned parcel abutts. This development should provide for the extension of " High Ridge Terrace about 30' south and to the north line of parcel 010-77 along with the installation of the short cul-de-sac. RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMENTS: To accomodate the cul-de-sac construction, the City will require about 2400 sq ft of right-of-way dedication from the following: 1) SW corner of lot 9, Highview Acres. .2) NW corner of parcel 010-75. 3) HE corner of parcel 010-77. The above right-of-way will suit a 55' radius for the cul-de-sac centered about at the NW corner of this proposed development. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the City's assessment records, Staff found that this development is 'responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments. In addition, assessment research indicated the City only assessed approximately 38% of the trunk area water assessment back in 1977. The assessment rate at that time was $380/net acre. The City assessed only $180 for the 1.26 acre parcel. The total assessment should have been $478.80. To correct this situation, Staff recommends that this development be respon- sible for the remaining 62% ($478.80-$180.$478.80) of the trunk =area watermain '.rate in _affect ';at the time . of -Ti-nal platting. ---This would amount -to an additional -obligation of 5737_80 that this parcel has for trunk area watermain assessments. - The obliga- ..tion .of this -development for _trunk., area storm sewer .1B $2,635 (34,886 sq ft x $.048/sq ft).- The final amounts will be based on the areas determined by the final.plat and the amount of right- of-way dedicated and also using the.rates in effect at the time of final platting. /'7/ MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER; ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, PARKS PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1985 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF REMICK ADDITION Background/Purpose The Planning Commission staff report regarding the Remick Addition references an alternative which places a half R.O.W. along the west 25' of the subject parcel and Highview Park. This alterna- tive, in staff's opinion, is not in the best interest of the park property. Existing Conditions Highview Park is a neighborhood park with a tot lot, hockey rink, tennis court, softball and open play area. A majority of the site is maintained turf grass. Significant vegetation masses exists within the northeast -and southwest portion of the parkland. The topography within the park can be characterized as gently rolling with several large flat areas. The terrain within the potential half R.O.W. is low in the northwest corner of the park with an approximate 10' change in elevation to a 6' high ridg adjacent to Skyline Road. The gradient of slope within this are is approximately -5-15%. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the park is from Skyline Road. The northern one-half of the park service area, does not have direct pedestrian access to the park property. Analysis -The placement' of a road-R.O:W. along the west 23' of Highview Park would change the existing topographic character of that portion of .:_:the --park. The grading .of -.the.. roadbed would go :beyond -the �25' R.O.W. with side slopes extending approximately 50' into the park. ':Typically uniform 3:1 -slopes are not placed into Eagan parks because 'of' the engineered visual consequence and maintenance. A 5:1 slope provides a softer and more complimentary slope within parks and are maintainable. This excessive grading would destroy three 24-30' oaks, several poplars and an established mature sumac stand. This plant mass as indicated within the park system plan provides a buffer to the adjacent residential area, preserves signi-. ficant vegetation and provides a space for passive use for trails and sitting areas.. Recommendation Staff recommends that the -Planning R.O.W. along the western 25' of Lot _,.and with in.Highview Park be ^denied: SS/j J report alternative 1, Block 1, Remick for road Addition • 113 - w Preliminary Plat of: REMICK ADDITION IW1.IY ®rl/IIP LrtirtlrlO.`:: •. fII�VHr1 fYl J APC Minutes r' ' December 19, 1985 is ':�REMICK-ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall called the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat request of Mark Remick for a single lot plat consisting of 1.26 acres for a single homestead in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4. City Planner Runkle described the parcel which was basically a landlocked parcel, lacking access on to any public street, creating difficulties in regard to compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Wayne Cordes appeared on behalf of the applicant indicating that the applicant preferred a simple driveway system, an extension of his father's own driveway, rather than the construction of a public street with a cul-de-sac to this single family home. It was indicated that the applicant's father received water and sewer through an outlot of an adjacent development which was apparently owned by the City due to tax forfeiture. Discussion centered around the possibility of selling the outlot to the Remicks to provide the proper access to a public street. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to table the application until the next Planning Commission meeting so that staff could further investigate the possibility of sale of the outlot to the applicant. All voted yea. SILVER BELL I - PRELIMINARY PLAT - DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY • Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application for the preliminary plat consisting of a 202,200 square foot office warehouse on 8.3 acres in the southeast quarter of Section 18. City Planner Runkle presented the application. Mr. Bernie Frye and engineer Dave Hansing, were also present to provide information in regard to the -proposal. Mr. Frye indicated that it was understood by the applicant that he would be restricted to a 50/50 office warehouse use due to the parking requirements by the City. Mr. Runkle pointed out that a setback variance was allowed due to the fact that the entire parcel was technically front lot lines with a portion for which the variance was requested being adjacent to excess right-of-way for Highway #13. It was agreed that these conditions created a hardship for which setback variance would be allowed. Wold moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading plan shallindicate the proposed grading on parcel 011-02 along with written permission from this property owner to grade on his property. 2. The final grading plan shall also indicate the necessary retaining wall along the T.H. i/13 right-of-way. 3. All salvaged pipe materials and appurtenances shall remain the property of the City of Eagan and stockpiled as requested by the City. 4. This development shall be responsible for the relocating and reburying ® of the 12 inch trunk watermain in accordance with the approved plans by the City of Eagan. :.p). -. . . . 175. R APC Minutes January 28, 1986 REMICK ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT 'Chairperson McCrea then called the public hearing on the application of Mark Remick for preliminary.plat for one single family home in Highview Acres located in part of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4, north of Highview Park and west of Pilot knob Road. Dale Runkle presented the application which had previously been before the Planning Commission and was now before the commission on the basis of a proposed land swap of Outlet 1, Valley View Plateau No. 2 to ft. Remick to provide necessary frontage to a public street in exchange for a dedication of comparable land to the City for park purposes as recommended by the Park Department. Mr. Fred DeLosh, the owner of the land directly south of the parcel to be conveyed to Mr. Remick, appeared and pointed out his concern regarding future street construction to serve his property and the alleged need for a fence between his property and the City Park. Wilkins moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and the transfer of Outlet 1, Valley View Plateau No. 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Public utilities be brought to this development and if constructed under public contract, the project must be authorized by Council prior to final plat approval. - 2. This development shall be responsible for its obligation for trunk area storm sewer assessments and the correct amount of trunk area watermain assessment. 3. That the plat be in compliance with all other City ordinances. 4. That the owner be responsible for the construction and cost of necessary utilities. 5. That the developer provide the City with an easement for snow storage on Outlet 1. 6. That the applicant be required to obtain additional land from the property to the north to provide the access required under City Code. All voted in favor. Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-two J • PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING/GREENSBORO PROJECT C. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single Family Lots on 40 Acres and a Rezoning From A to PD for Greensboro/Dave Gabbert --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their December 19, 1985 meeting and upon the continuance was again heard at the January 28, 1986 APC meeting. There were questions raised at. the first public hearing, regarding the future extension of Wescott Hills Drive. The City staff has studied this area and the findings are includ d in the attached memorandum found on pages through The application requesting a rezoning 40 acre of a e agricul ural parcel to an R-1, PD district and a proposed plat entitled Greeensborc, a -re both being recommeded for approval by the Advisory Planning Commission. For additional information on the item, refer to the staff report, copies are enclosed on pages through For a copy of the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend ion for the Greensboro plat refer to a memo enclosed on page For a copy of the minutes of the Advisory Planning Comm ssion meetings concerning the Greensboro Project, refer to page A copy of the January 28, 1986, minutes will be included with th Additional Information on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) 2) Preliminary plat for 90 single family lots entitled Greensboro Addition . i7� • MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 22, 1986 SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO GREENSBORO PRELIMINARY PLAT At the December Planning Commission meeting the Commission requested the Engineering Department to review how Wescott Hills Dr could be extended. Staff studied the area with representatives from the Parks and Planning Depts to determine the most feasible exten- sion of Wescott Hills Dr to the south. Staff's recommendation for feasible alignments are shown on the attached sketch. As it turns out, an alignment through the Greensboro Addition is not feasible for the following reasons: 1. Extremely difficult topography 2. Large amount of unassessable frontage 3. Excessive amount of right-of-way acquisition • Instead, it makes more sense to extend Wescott Hills Dr easterly and then southerly or extend Trails End Rd southerly and connect Wescott Hills Dr to Trails End Rd. Either way, Mr Griffin, the owner of parcel 011-08, will have public access to his property. The Engineering Dept will be `forwarding these feasible alignments to the school district so that they are aware of the necessary future street extension in this area. CC: Dave Gabbert, Developer Paul Griffin Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation enclosure LK It fc \ r T— q 3. sit opt , ;AN I, "t ' �IV�.�!-r.-'-J� IL" >� � . j•^.��,: \i.' �,�—�-��"( (1 G \ I (`I����11n1111111 �� l�lt4;l�, .a r �r 1 iI IIA I - e _ p".�5- \ ! ` ..� �Ijl�% �✓ 1 r ��\\ \\\ \ . Yt r J�,] y r ;?t j � `„ Y t{r � v t' �i="�:-3e � �i.' I+•' �1 ��: � O_ = r. � � _ .� .;�, I� II � = �� . -�_ 1 \�C' \`� ` r _ } ��i� � � - J -I l+�Y ii• .� f �v � �� L�� 1 cly �c�/! � 17Fi�1,� l-- i ""� �\ 1, i YW f { ti �,. �;] kI� ♦Eeh a n �' '\�,�\\ 1/ f v {�/(-./ IIY. � Ila � /.v1 -_ \\ c- - <• ) Z _\\ \\� II J/ 1(�(ly/� J \ r;nd Rd `'ic--... - I n xnulnlll�OwlnwWl��u(n(ulplPuulluununl�l UP wl- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT:. REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - APPLICANT: DAVE GABBERT LOCATION: SWa OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 9, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a rezoning of a 40 acre A (agricultural) parcel to a R-1 P.D. (Planned Development) district. This site is located directly south of Carriage Hills Golf Course and abutts Wescott Road. The P.D. is required because there are lots under the 12,000 sq ft minimum as designated by City Code. ® ZONING AND LAND USE: The subject parcel has a Comprehensive Plan designation of R-2, 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed plat , all R-1 will have a density of 2.16 units/gross acre or 2.49 units/net acre, both of which are below the R-2 density allowance. Adjacent land uses are: PF (golf course) to the north, P.D. (single family) to the south and northwest and A to the southwest and east (the proposed Wescott Elementary School site). SITE PLANNING/CODE COMPLIANCE: The submitted site plan indicates 8.7 total lots, 51 of which meet the Code requirement of an 85' front yard width at the setback line., .The remaining 36 have lot widths ranging between 75' - 82' at' the setback line. Lot sizes also vary with this being the breakdown: 50 lots +12,000 sq ft, 15 @ 11-12,000 s.f., 12 @ 10-11,000 .s.f., and 10 @.9-10,000 s.f. with the smallest at 9,520 s.f. The smaller lots are generally where there are less natural amenity features such as the interior portion of the site and along the eastern border that abutts the school property. The site is one of numerous knolls and depressions. Mature vegetation is scattered but most heavy around the low lying areas. Access to the site is from a loop road that connects to Wescott Road. An additional road will bisect the site from the S.W. to the N.E. lots abutting this street will be parallel to the ® Williams Pipeline Easement and will require front yard setback variances. A proposed cul-de-sac will extend to the N.W. from this road serving 4 lots. It was Staff's recommendation that 79 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 • PAGE 2 stubs for utilities be placed to the west and north should Carriage Hills Golf Course change use in the future. The development of this project will take place in 2 years. Year one will include the loop road from the west entry (from Wescott) to approximately lot 21. The second year will see the continuation of the loop road to Wescott Road, the secondary road and 2 cul-de-sacs. COMMENTS: A trail is planned in the Wescott Road right-of-way at the time of street improvements. Staff has been working on providing trail/vehicular connections between Lexington Place South, the subject plat and the proposed school site. It is our recommendation that a pedestrian connection through the outlot in Lexington Place South and the proposed plat between lots 12 and 13 of block 1 be provided. Also, the possibility of placing an 8' trail in the pipeline easement from the loop road to the schocl property be further researched. Staff will provide addit_onal sketch plans for review at the December 19 APC meeting. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed grading for this development appears feasible from an engineering standpoint. However, due to the rolling nature of this site, this grading plan does not propose to fill several small depressions. This is fine as long is as the developer constructs storm sewer outlets from these depressions to prevent future flooding. This development is located in major drainage district J as shown on. figure #1. As you can see from the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, the northeas'C corner of this development includes a portion of Pond JP -32. This pond presently has no storm sewer outlet. The Comprehensive Plan allows for two alternatives for constructing an outlec to this pond. One alternative is through a series of ponds to the north and east and eventually to Pond JP -12 from which the storm water would be pumped into Pond JP -19. The other alternative is to construct a 12" gravity line from Pond JP -32 to the south and connect to the trunk storm sewer presently under contract with the Lexington Square Development. Staff recommends the second alternative with the 12" line to the south because it will eliminate some additional water to be pumped from .lift station 15 thereby reducing future maintenance costs and capital costs for pump oversizing. Staff further recommends this development provide for outlets to several natural depressions within this development described as follows and illustrated on figure 2: 1) The 900 contour on lots 10 and 11 of block 1. 2) The 899 contour immediately west of lot 8 located within the Lexington Place South Addition. 3) The 880 contour located within block 3, south of the pipeline easement and north of Wescott Road. REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO ® DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 3 Erosion control shall be .provided on the final detail agreement plan in accordance with the City's Erosion. Control Manual. This development will have to revise the street grades to provide for a 2% slope for 100 feet from all intersections with the exception of the cul -de -.sac in block 3. Staff can accept the proposed grades on this cul-de-sac for the following reasons: 1) -The small amount of traffic. 2) Conforming to the City Code would require additional fill over and above what the developer is proposing within the Williams Brothers pipeline easement. The developer will have to obtain permission from Williams Brothers Pipeline Company to fill over the pipeline within the pipeline easement. UTILITIES: Presently there are no City utilities in place to provide services to the proposed development. However, City ® Project 433 provides for trunk storm and sanitary sewer to the southeast corner of this development. Staff anticipates this project to be under construction early next spring with completion by mid to late summer. The closest watermain is at the intersection of Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue. City Project 450 provides for extension of the trunk watermain to the east line of the Williams and La Rue Addition leaving it approximately 100 feet west of this develop- ment. This developer proposes on installing all utilities and streets under public contract. Therefore, prior to final plat approval the Council must authorize the improvements to extend watermain along Wescott Road to this site and also extend the trunk sanitary and trunk storm sewer through this site as the Comprehensive Storm and Sanitary Sewer Plans propose. STREETS: This entire development is bordered on the south by Wescott Road. Wescott Road is presently a 20 foot gravel surface rural section roadway. This developer and the Lexington Square Development have petitioned for the upgrading of Wescott Road to City collector street status. Council approval for upgrading of Wescott Road should also occur prior to final plat approval of this development. The proposed street layout for this development is acceptable • with the exception of the cul-de-sac in block 2. Because there is no topographic hardship or. difficulties in accessibility to the area it serves, in contrast to the southerly cul-de-sac, Staff recommends the elimination of this cul-de-sac and continuing this street northwesterly through lot 8 of block 2. V REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 • PAGE 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff has no problems with the proposed right-of-way dedications. However, Staff recommends the right-of- way'for,,the cul-de-sac to be modified slightly where the radius meets the tangent portion. This is relatively minor and can be worked out with the developer during the final plat preparation. Also, the proposed 50 foot half right-of-way dedication for Wescott Road is in accordance with City Code for a collector street right- of-way width. The City should require this development to dedicate the following utility easements: 1) The westerly 15 feet of lots 9 and 10, block 1 for storm sewer. 2) A 15 foot utility easement centered over lots 7 and 8, block 1 for storm sewer. 3) A 30 foot easement within lot 24, block 1 for sanitary sewer (location to be based on design). 4) A ponding easement encompassing the 888.1 high water elevation for Pond JP -32. 5.), .A ponding easement encompassing the 881 elevation for the depression located within block 3. 6) A 15 foot easement over lots 15 and 16, block 2 and lots 21 and 22, block 1 for storm sewer. 7). A 15 foot easement located across the common lot lines of lots 1, 2 and 29 of block 2 for storm sewer. This development shall dedicate all additional easements as per City ,Code ;requirements. TRAILWAYS. Because Wescott Road is designated a minor arterial roadway it requires a 5' sidewalk along the north side of it. This sidewalk will be this development's responsibility. In addition, the Park Department is looking to provide trailway access from the Lexington Place South development adjacent the westerly boundary of this development to the future park property located east of this development. As of this report, the location is unknown but this development will be responsible for providing the necessary easements and the financial obligations for the construction of this trailway when the Park Department determines the actual location. - �0 v REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO • DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 5 ASSESSMENTS: The Cityassessment records indicate that no trunk area water, sanitary sewer, or storm sewer assessments have been levied over this parcel. Trunk sanitary sewer assessments are pending under Project 433. Project 433 provides for the installa- tion of trunk sanitary and storm sewer through the Lexington Square Addition to its northeast corner. Because this develop- ment will have to petition for the installation of public streets and utilities, it would be appropriate to include the trunk area watermain and storm sewer assessments with that particular project. Council authorization of the necessary improvements to this develop- ment will be necessary before this development can receive final plat approval. n • REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1) Council shall authorize the necessary public improvement projects to provide streets and utilities for this development prior to final plat approval. 2) This development shall obtain an easement or authorization from Williams Brothers Pipeline to perform grading activities within the Williams Brothers easement. 3) The drainage plan shall incorporate storm water outlets for depressions located on lots 10 and 11, block 1; west of lot '8; and within block 3, all is noted within the Engineering Report. 4) All street grades at intersections shall meet City Code with the exception of the southerly cul-de-sac. 5) The northerly cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and the street extended to connect to the looped street. 6) The Council shall approve the upgrading of Wescott Road prior to final plat approval. 0 7) The developer shall provide for a trailway as appropriate • from Lexington Place South to the proposed school site east of this development. 8) The developer shall dedicate a 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road, the street looping onto Wescott Road shall be a minimum of 60 foot right-of-way with the other interior streets minimum of 50 foot right-of-way. 9') The developer shall dedicate the following easements: A. The westerly 15' of lots 9 and 10, block 1 for storm sewer. B. A 15' utility easement centered over lots 7 and 8, block 1 for storm sewer. C. A 30' easement within lot 24, block 1 for sanitary sewer with final location being based on final design. D. A ponding easement encompassing the 888.1 high water elevation for pond JP -3'2. E. A ponding easement encompassing the 881 elevation for the depression located within block 3. F. A 15' easement over lots 15 and 16, block 2 and lots 21 and 22, block 1 for storm sewer. G. A 15' easement located across the common lot lines of lots 1, 2, and 29 of block 2 for storm sewer. 10) This development shall be responsible for the installation • of a 5' concrete walk along Wescott Road. %F� 9 U • %o AL V1MA -�ORIE. 'R04R �'." OIEiflV VIflR a� CPNA/ILF i_ SOUW( ' e i om w 4 1 �,GG= LLGf jAy rou.asc GYL—u JL ---------- - ff t IKI W � B -YE /a a ,oma` Tl u)"' :� sr.•%cwEKT w�wncRGsr lr e�a•k•� i rCc a0 %o 0 61 GREENSBORO Il 1DP-20 C)P�9 Er.;i7 901.0 TOL 880.0o 52� 3, C ()P -i 893 E16 RXII 6 82 2 --A�-l WESCOIT U, D, 191.06 D-- 84 CARRIAGE 12" HILLS CO�F F -h ARIE /11-14 DP= 8330 8921 �'8540 .8730 JP -I6 2' ---IDP-25 I :t�CN 1882.0 -33 88,194,,7 'Sp; I 8121.1 O�4 �3, ip 89 0 '�- 8320 87,m 1Z JP 5-9 "5495 C-677 --�rP--6*5-, -7P -,4 r 1.0 2�3 P� 868.7 -- 8640 15 ....... -�p 412 8 7.9 7 ;'-bCOTT I J8P;,602 117.1 r Bj7 :1�� 8881 17 �ATrrlp� JP -15 1 -j ;a6953 .4 JBP; P20 -10 - 92, 7 3. L.S. -I jP 41 826. 846.5 12 88853 .... 87.0 -63 R E; -- ie L'Sr1 JP 8997 AbCITpN CIT --90 JP -31 JP 11 876,3 815.7 .39 44-- jP I ip 880.4 8840 Sel 830.0 89, ..7 8950 57 1r 1'Tr LR J'b ..... . C J JP -19 30 05. -41-- m;: JP -58d 8740 r= 8775 882.0 IZ:,Z j 4, J -P 820.8 73D /S-30 10 130.0 8 4 DO 879, SQUARE 85 20 --j I J- JP -20•• N, 856.6 `-�;JP-4JP-21 9 LS -17 810 1 830.0 81 5.3 P-9 840.0 2. 8:io-.�- -36' m TN. 7 ff�24�ATCH. L7' ',RK J d 2 d wil 7") nF PARJ C A 889.0 • JP -.0 JP -22 'AGA 89 9 86�.0 820.7 :77 5 1. 1 88 .4 840.0-- i2riloss PARA JP -29 9260 JP -F27- 855 0 2E 9450 . - 60 �i904.0 2W.0 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. approved: plate plate #: MEM07�T0=TOM=HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • iOROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS &RECREATION ��"" DATE: JANUARY 15, 1986 BE: PROPOSED PRELIMARY PLAT - GREENSBORO - DAVE GABBERT The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat entitled "Greensboro Addition" at its January 9 Commission meeting. There was considerable discussion by the Commission concerning trail routing through the plat and a desire to incorporate a trail route which would best facilitate walkers from the residential area. to the school property. It was noted that walkers could be accomodated from this development as well as a through connection to the Lexington Place South development immediately adjacent and west of this plat. With this background, the Advisory Commission made the following recommendations as condition of plat approval: 1. That the developer provide a cash dedication requirement. 2. A bituminous trailway connection to the Lexington Place South development to the west be made. 3. A trail connection to the school to the east with placement of which should be worked out with the school district and City staff. isCommission also requested that should there be significant changes in this preliminary plat, noting that it had not yet received Planning Commission's recommendations for approval, that the plat be returned to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission for final review and recommendations. r\ U KV/js CC: Julie Dykstra - Planning Aide Ed Kirscht - Engineering Technician APC Minutes December 19, 1985 • -GRBENSBORO.- PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Dave Gabbert for rezoning and preliminary plat of a 40 acre Agriculture parcel to R-1 PD, located south of Carriage Hills Golf Course adjacent to Wescott Road in the southwest quarter of Section 14. City Planner Runkleindicatedthat the Comprehensive Guide designated the property as R-2 with a density of 3 to 6 units per acre. The applicant was proposing a 87 single family lots of which 36 lots would be under 12,000 square feet, which was the reason for the request for R-1 PD zoning. Mr. Gabbert was present to indicate the reasons for small lots and the cul-de-sac. Mr. Paul Griffin, a neighbor, appeared indicating that there was a need for access to his and other property and the future extension of Wescott Hills Drive: It was pointed out that the parcel directly east of this parcel had been purchased by Independent School District #196 and the City of Eagan for the school site and park site. Assistant City Engineer Hefti indicatea that indeed there was a need to extend a major street through this area and that staff needed to review what options were available. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to postpone the matter for .30 days • to allow staff to determine where access would be allowed for future street improvements. All members voted yes. C� ® Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986,.City Council Meeting Page Thirty-three • WAIVER OF PLAT/LOT 7, BLOCK 1, SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION D. Waiver of Plat (Pietsch Construction) Duplex Lot Split, Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1st Addition --A waiver of plat application was submitted 'by Pietsch Construction to split the duplex lot on Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1st Addition. The Sun Cliff lst _.- Addition consists of 191 single-family lots and 43 duplex lots, a total of 277 dwelling units. The subject lot is 10,625 and is on the NW side of Sunrise Road. This lot will be split into two separate parcels, each measuring 42.50' X 1251. The existing lot has separated utilities and this lot split will not effect the service in any way. A map is enclosed on pageZq/for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat (Pietsch Construction) for a duplex lot split, Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1st Addition. 4OR: PIETSCH CONSTRUCTION / If C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. BAND SURVEYORS TSL 645.3646 1361 EUSTIS ST." ST. PAUL, MINN. 66106 That Bart of Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff First Addition, Dakota Countv, Minnesota lvinq southwesterly of the Northeasterlv 42.50 feet thereof. WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Doted thi.146day of October A.D. 1985 .::House .Locafed..Dec ./6,19,95 . C. R./JW IIINDEN8 ASSOCIATES, INC. by Sur.oyor, Minnesota Registration No.-7-772� • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-four .ADDITIONAL.ITEMS MINNESOTA CITY LEGISLATIVE POLICIES A. Review of League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies --The 1986 proposed city policies and priorities for the League of Minnesota Cities was distributed several days ago to each member of the City Council. The 1986 Legislative Conference will be held on Wednesday, February 5, at the St. Paul Radisson Hotel in St. Paul. Traditionally, City Councilmembers have reviewed the legislative format and if there are any concerns or considera- tions that any member would like to discuss and ask that the City's representative submit a change at the conference on Wednesday, these items should be discussed at Tuesday's City Council meeting. It is not suggested that each item be reviewed; however, certain items that do raise a concern for any member of the City Council should be discussed and: a position will be st if there is a majority consensus on that particular ._ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To address the 1986 proposed • City Policies and Priorities as drafted by the League of Minnesota Cities and present any changes at the legislative conference on Wednesday, February 5, 1986. I\ L Special Note: Mayor Blomquist, City Councilmember Smith and City Administrator Hedges are registered for this one -day confer— ence. • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-five REVIEW/APPROVE SPECIAL ASSMT. CMTE. RECOMMENDATIONS B. Review/Approve Special Assessment Committee Recommendations --On January 16, 1986, the Special Assessment Committee met to review several requests of property owners who requested special considera- tion pertaining to their final assessments associated with projects recently completed or their pending assessments associated with projects under construction to be final assessed at a later date. Enclosed on pages / Z through / 3-F is a copy of the minutes of that Special Assessment Commi LEe meeting discussing each item and their proposed recommendations. Of the 11 requests received from property owners, the first five dealt with pending assessments where the projects have not been completed or the final assessment hearings initiated. The final six property owners dealt with appeals resulting from final assessment hearings held on September 17. Of those final six, four were addressed under the public hearing items of this agenda and two (Patrick McCarth been continued to a later date due to continuation assessment Committee recommendations. As a part of the Committee's review of these requests for special • consideration, a new special assessment policy pertainin to sidewalk/trailway assessments (enclosed on pages /rj(Z and /) ;i has been prepared, reviewed by the Committee and is eing forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for formal adoption. e3 i� :o. As a result of the Committee's discussion regarding assessments resulting from collector/arterial street improvements, a formal special assessment policy is being prepared for consideration by a Council action to be distributed with the Administrative packet for the February 4 meeting. The last item of consideration by the Committee pertained to creating a new assessment classification for large undeveloped regional type parklands. This formal policy statement will also be distributed with the Administrative packet for formal consideration at the February 4 meeting. Enclosed -on pages /Cj� through 2.1E is the introductory -items associated with eac of the issue is by the Special Assessment Committee resulting_ in their recommendations contained in the previously referenced minutes. You will note that none of the supporting background information has been included in an effort to conserve on the volume of information distributed with this Council agenda packet. However, if any Councilmember wishes to have this information provided prior to the Council meeting, it can be distributed with the Administrative agenda • if so requestd. _ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify the recommendations of the .Special Assessment Committee meeting of January 16, .1986, and, if approved, authorize staff to make appropriate adjustments in the proposed assessments to the affected parcels. /193 • MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA JANUARY 16, 1985 A regular meeting of the Special Assessment Committee was held at the Eagan Municipal Center at 4:30 p.m. on January 16, 1986. Those present were Chairman Don Knight, Members Dale Vogt and Bill Rydrich, Mayor Bea Blomquist and Councilman Tom Egan. Absent was member Garrett Mulrooney. Also present were Public Works Director Tom Colbert and City Attorney Paul Hauge. AGENDA Vogt moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the Agenda as presented. A11 voted yes. FRANCIS C. FRANZ a ANNA S. HEUER PROPERTY - PROJECT #372 Tom Colbert described the concerns of the property owners consisting of Francis C. Franz and Anna S. Heuer on the south side of Deerwood Drive, objecting to proposed assessments associated with the recent completion of ® Deerwood Drive from Riverton Avenue to the east side of I -35E. The upgrading was performed under Project #372 by MnDOT through a Cost Participation Agreement with the City, with the majority of the costs paid by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a portion paid by the City. The Assessment Committee at its meeting in October 1985.received the objections and requestea further information from the staff. The configuration, topography and setback restrictions were considered to be unique to the parcel, noting that the westerly parcel on the south side of Deerwooa Drive and the easterly parcel on. the north side of Deerwooa Drive, owned by Francis Franz should, according to Mr. Colbert's recommendation, receive credits toward the proposed assessments for lateral purposes and recommended a 300 foot reduction on the easterly parcel and 100 feet along the westerly parcel. In addition„ there was discussion concerning proposed Sidewalk Trailway Policy #86-1 submitted by the staff. Member Ryarich questioned whether it would be permissible to assess a residential equivalent on Deerwood Drive if there is no direct access allowed. There was discussion concerning the 1978 Major Street Policy and also Mr. Colbert reviewed the Johnny Cake Ridge Road project commenced in 1976. It appeared that the Johnny Cake Ridge project was similar to the Deerwood Drive improvements and indicated that 50% of the Johnny Cake Ridge Road project was paid by the State and 50% from MSAS funds, with no assessments to adjacent property owners, with the understanding that all easements would be granted by the affected property owners. 1 • Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 It was noted further that there was uncertainty as to development of the adjoining land on Deerwood and that it was assumed that access would be restricted with direct driveways prohibited. Attorney Pat Farrell appeared on behalf of Mr. Franz and stated that because of the residual configuration of the various parcels of the Franz property, that it may be impractical to levy assessments, claiming there were no benefits against the property for sidewalk and street purposes. He argued there were no reasonable benefits to the property, and further, that the majority of the funds were federal funds used to install improvements with a small amount of City funding. It was also indicated that Mr. Franz has built a single family home on the property and therefore some benefit resulted. It was suggested that there would possibly be a benefit from the assessments for the single family home, and further, that sidewalks could be assessed depending upon the future use of the property. A representative of Mrs. Heuer was present and stated that the Heuer property is vacant and undeveloped. There was further discussion concerning proposed assessment for street and sidewalk purposes on all benefited properties on both the north and south side of Deerwood Drive. Egan then moved, Blomquist seconded the motion to recommend assessing the Francis Franz property for single family use only, with future assessments against the property based upon future uses including the sidewalk and trailway which would comply with the assessment policy at the time of future development; • further, that the staff be directed to prepare a policy implementing the proposed recommendations of the Committee. All voted in favor. SIDEWALK AND TRAILWAY POLICY - Rydrich moved, Egan seconded the motion to recommend adoption of the Trailway and Sidewalk Policy 4186-1 submitted by the staff and recommend that the City Council approve it. All membersvoted yes. WILLARD BERFELZ - PROJECT 41447 - LONE OAK ADDITION On August 6,. 1985, a" public hearing was held for the installation of trunk watermain along Highway 41149 from Yankee Doodle Road to Trunk Highway 4155. It was noted the Berfelz property is used as a single family residence but is zoned Light Industrial. Mr. Colbert recommended to the Committee that conditioned upon the owner executing an agreement for Special Assessment Policy 4182-2, the staff recommended the rate be reduced to an Agricultural - Single Family rate and in addition, that the assessable footage be reduced to 135 feet for Lot 12, Auditor's Subdivision No. 38. Mr. and Mrs. Berfelz were present and stated that they also own Parcel 010-28 and Colbert stated that the same recommendation would apply to that parcel, with the understanding that both parcels are classified as homestead by the County Assessor. Mr. and Mrs. Berfelz had no objection to the proposed recommendation and upon motion • by Egan, seconded Vogt,.it was recommended to the City Council that the staff -recommendation be adopted, including Parcel 010-28 and in the event that the property has been previously assessed for the same improvements, that no - assessment be levied by the City. Council. Staff was requested to investigate the statement of Mr. Berfelz that the,property had been assessed for the same. purpose at an earlier time. All voted yes. ig3 h • • Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 DON SANDBERG - PROJECT #427 - YANKEE DOODLE ROAD The next request for reconsideration of proposed assessments came from Don Sandberg, property owner on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. The improvement provides for the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road from a present. rural ditch section to a four lane road with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities. Mr. Sandberg's property contains 390 feet of frontage with a single family homestead. A 7.5 acre parcel is hampered by a protective wetland incorporated in the middle one-third of his property and Mr. Colbert recommended that the property be assessed for a comparable single family residential frontage according to City policy under the following conditions: 1. That the parcel be unplatted. 2. That the parcel shall have a net area of 3 acres, excluding all public and dedicated right-of-way ponding easements. 3. That the parcel have a minimum 200 foot frontage on the public right- of-way where the connection is being made. Mr. Sandberg's property qualified, and therefore it was recommended that the assessment be reduced to a comparable single family frontage of 100 feet and that the additional assessments associated with the remaining frontage be assessed at the time of the rezoning of the development of any part or all of the balance of the property. Mr. Sandberg was present and had no objections to the recommendation. Egan moved, Vogt. seconded the motion to recommend approval of the staff recommendation and forward .it to the City Council. All members voted affirmatively. YD ASSOCIATES - PROJECT X1427 - YANKEE DOODLE ROAD The Committee then considered a request of YD Associates under Project #427 regarding street and storm sewer improvements on Yankee Doodle Road to review the proposed assessments against the property. Mr. Colbert discussed the proposed assessments and Vance Grannis, Sr. appeared on behalf of the owners, objecting to the proposed assessments. He indicated that there was not adequate benefit, from the improvements, to justify the assessments. Mr. Colbert pointed out that there is a hazardous intersection at Coachman Road, there is lack of ability for through -traffic and the upgrading of the street will improve the value of the adjacent property. No 'specific action was taken, noting that the assessments will not be levied until 1987 and Mr. Grannis indicated that an appraisal will be submitted within the next few months, to the City. /P(1, 3 • Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 PATRICK McCARTHY - PROJECT #404 - LEXINGTON AVENUE TRUNK WATER MAIN PROJECT #411 - BIRCH PARK ADD TRUNK STORM SEWER The objections of Patrick McCarthy were next brought to the assessment committee pertaining to the assessments associated with the trunk water main along Lexington Avenue. Mr. Colbert reviewed with the committee members the projected assessments. and stated that a letter from Arnold Kempe, the attorney for the owner, requesting a continuance, had been submitted to his office. After discussion, Vogt moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue consideration of the objections, including Project #411, Birch Park Addition trunk storm sewer, until the next meeting of the assessment committee, noting that the applicant was not present. All members voted yea. DON VOGTMAN - PROJECT #411 - SKOVDALE The objections of Don Vogtman to the proposed trunk storm sewer assessments under Project #411 consisting of the Birch Park Addition/Patrick Eagan Park area were brought to the committee by Mr. Colbert. The Public Works Director detailed the City's position and recommended that due to the recent fill placed on the property eliminating the previous low drainage basin and redirecting the drainage flow that the storm sewer system serviced by Project #411, it's the staff's recommendation that the property be determined benefited by the improvement and that the assessment as proposed be reaffirmed. Don Vogtman was present and read a statement in opposition, ® including the fact that his land should be treated similar to the adjacent lots which receive about 56% credit, based upon the large -lot allowance. He stated that his lana is serving as a temporary ponding area and it is fairly heavily wooded, offering absorption qualities, and further that the benefit is . not in proportion to the proposed assessments. Committee members noted that the 75 foot frontage at present will be reduced at the time of Pilot Knob Road widening, with the balance of about 60 feet for access from Deerwooa Drive to the northerly portion. Noting that Mr:. Vogtman's_property includes Lot 7 and the north half of Lot 6,Block 1, Skovdale, and that access to it for development would come from Deerwooa Drive, Blomquist moved, Egan seconded the motion to recommend to the City Council that it allow.a large -lot policy credit for the two lots, because of the fact that the parcels are platted, the fact that the other lots within Skovaale have received the large -lot .credit, that all of Skovdale Addition was platted at one time and it would penalize the Vogtman property if it was not permitted; but in the event that the two parcels are divided into more than two single family lots, that the Council then may reconsider the assessments and increase the amount of the trunk storm sewer assessments at that time. All members voted yes. /93 d 4 40 Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 VICTOR STAFF - PROJECT #411 - SKOVDALE 2ND ADDITION The next objection brought before the Committee consisted of those from Mr. and Mrs. Victor Staff covering Lot 5, 'Block 1, SkovaaLe 2nd Addition, under Project #411, Birch Park Aadition/Patrick Eagan Park trunk storm sewer. At the September 19, 1985 final assessment hearing before the City Council, Darrel Baska, the attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Staff, submitted a written Notice of Appeal and objected to the assessments. Mr. Baska was present and indicated that the level of the adjacent pond had increased and caused a portion of the Staff property to be lost and that an action has been commenced against the City for inverse condemnation. Negotiations have taken place for settlement of the action. Mr. Colbert noted that the staff had recommended a deduct for the area covered by water, and had adopted the large -lot formula with the balance of the lot assessed for storm sewer purposes. It was proposed the assessment be based on the area above the easement level of 830 feet. Egan moved, Blomquist seconded the motion to recommend to the City Council that it levy assessments. for storm sewer purposes above the 830 footlevel, including dedication of the easement from the Staffs and an acceptable settlement of the inverse condemnation action brought against the City. All voted yes. RONALD BOYLE - PROJECT X1411 - BIRCH PARK ADDITION ® The objections from Mr. and Mrs. Ronald. Boyle of Deerwood Drive to storm sewer assessments against their property were next considered by the Committee. Mr. Colbert reviewed the objections and noted that they were comparable to the Bergin, Caponi and Rooney objections, all of whose property drains into JP -8. He stated that JP -8 does not have an outlet at the present time, but that the rise in the level of the pond will require interconnections within a very short period of time. Blomquist moved, Egan seconded the motion to recommend approval of the staff's recommendation that the assessment against the parcel be deferred until the property is directly benefited due to the installation of outlets in Pond JP -8. All voted yes. LILLIAN McCARTHY - PROJECT X1411 BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK TRUNK STORM SEWER Mr. Colbert then brought before the Committee the objections of LiLlian McCarthy, an owner on Lexington Avenue objecting to the trunk storm sewer assessments under Project X1411. The parcel incorporates 3.91 acres with only 1.5 acres assessed at the Agricultural/Single Family rate, due to the large - lot credit proposed to be assessed against the property. There was no appearance on behalf of Ms. McCarthy. After discussion, Egan moved, Vogt seconded the motion to recommend that the proposed assessments with large -lot credit against the Lillian McCarthy property be approved by the City Council. All voted in favor. • C Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 PARKLAND - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY - HOLLAND LAKE AREA A memorandum prepared by Tom Colbert was discussed by the members dated January 16, 1986 regarding proposed assessments for storm sewer improvements in the Holland Lake/Cliff Road area. He stated the estimated cost of the major storm sewer project is approximately $900,.000.00, but that a large portion of the acreage, approximately 429 acres, consisting of County Park, would result in a proposed assessment of approximately $300,000.00 at the Agricultural/Single Family Residential rate. Preliminary discussion has been held with Dakota County representatives, indicating that they do not have the resources available to finance the estimated $300,000.00 ana because of the need to negotiate the assessments, there was concern by Committee members that the City should continue to negotiate for contribution from the County. There were also questions about improvements that would unaoubtealy be installed in the park, including park buildings, parking lots, etc. which would add to the storm sewer runoff. The Committee recommended an Ordinance be prepared to control the construction of improvements on public property without City approval. Egan moved, Vogt seconded the motion that the Committee be on record recommending to the City Council that it adopt a policy providing for one-half residential equivalent assessments against the County Park property for trunk storm sewer improvements, with the understanding that the City can impose restrictions on development, and in the event that future development of the park property takes place, that additional trunk storm sewer assessments could be levied against the benefited property. All members voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion duly made and seconded, All votea yes. 1�3-F 6 the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. PHH SAC 1/16/86 6r ZUlAL- A`.ibZbbM POLICY Sidewalk/Trailway Assessment SUBJECT: Assessments for the installation of concrete and/or bituminous trailways and sidewalks. POLICY: Sidewalks and trailways shall be installed in accordance with the City of Eagan 's master street and trailway plan which also incorporates related County and State installations. At the time of Council adoption of a project, through the public hearing process, sidewalks and trailways shall be assessed at the City's rate in effect at the time of the public hearing against all properties zoned Multiple Residential (R-3), Commercial, Institutional or Public Facility (P.F.). For purposes of this policy, land use guide plans and planned unit developments (P.U.D.) shall not be considered as existing zoning at the time of the public hearing. Properties zoned agricultural (Ag), single family (R-1) or duplex (R-2) shall not be assessed for any costs associated with • the installation of sidewalks or trailways. If applicable, properties that are subsequently rezoned at a later date to a higher qualifying zoning classification shall be assessed at the rates in effect at the time of the rezoning as a condition of development approval in accordance with policy #82-1. • OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this policy is to require higher density residential developments, commercial property, public facilities. and institutions to participate in the cost of the installation of sidewalks and trailways which are necessary due to the pedestrian traffic generated and/or' benefitted by these off-street improvements. JUSTIFICATION: Due to the fact that agricultural zoned property does not generate pedestrian traffic and taking into consideration the fact that single family (R-1) and duplex lots (R-2) are not allowed frontage on collector and arterial streets where sidewalks and trailways are constructed, the benefit associated with the related sidewalks and trailways are minimized accordingly. However, multiple ��7 SAC 1/16/86 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY NUMBER 86-1 ® PAGE 2 residential, commercial, institutional and public facilities generate the need for off-street pedestrian access. They should be assessed the related costs associated with their appropriate zoning. Reviewed and acted upon by: CITY COUNCIL: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE: Approved Date _Approved -//, Date Denied Date Denied Date L' • SAC 1/16/86 A. PROJECT 372, I -35E UTILITIES & STREETS - ASSESSMENT OBJECTIONS 1. Francis C. Franz (10-02100-010-50) 2. Anna S. Heuer (10-02100-010-78) BACKGROUND INFORMATION The two properties owners referenced above, have previously been addressed by the Special Assessment Committee at the October 9, 1984 meeting pertaining to their similar objections associated with the recent completion of the upgrading of Deerwood Dr from Riverton AV to the east side of I -35E. This upgrading of Deerwood Dr was performed under project 372 by MnDot through cost participa- tion agreement #16932. The information that was previously reviewed by the Special Assessment Committee at the October 9, 1984 meeting has been reproduced and is included with this packet for reference and discussion on these continued assessment objections. A copy of the minutes of the October 9, 1984 Special Assesment Committee meeting has also been included without page number for reference and discussion pertaining to these issues. • Enclosed on page (s) 19 - 2-0 is a proposed Special Assessment Policy that has been prepared by staff for the committee's review and adoption pertaining to assessments associated with the installa- tion of sidewalks or trailways. Although a portion of the Anna Heuer property has been acquired by School .District #196 for the construction of the new Deerwood Elementary School, the frontage location is not affected by this proposed project but will be addressed under project #455 in a manner that anticipates adoption of the recommended policy #86-1. The second and third concerns expressed by the committee at the previous meeting pertained to the determination of "benefitted frontage" by taking into consideration the configuration, topography and 'setback restrictions that may be unique to that parcel. Due to the varying degrees that any of these items can be applied to any particular parcel, it is difficult to create a uniform policy. Therefore, each parcel should be addressed on its own merits. In the situation of the Francie Franz property, the two severed residual portions of his property are located east of I-3'56/north of Deerwood Dr and west of I-35E/south of Deerwood Dr. As can be seen on page 9, -by themselves these parcels have limitations based on their configuration. However, if combined with adjacent parcels (which is likely for development) it will benefit by its full frontage. /9c SAC 1/16/86 • PROJECT 372, I -35E UTILITIES & STREETS (Page 2) In relation to the last item discussed by the committee, it was felt, that this issue should again be addressed by the Special Assessment Committee to the necessity of the adoption of a new Special Assessment Policy. It .is anticipated that the committee's recommendations pertaining to the new policy and disposition of these assessment objections will be forwarded to the Council for formal consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends that Special Assessment Policy #86-1 be adopted and applied to all future and pending public improvement, projects. In addition, it is recommended that a 400' frontage reduction be allocated to Mr. Francis C. Franz (10-02100-010-50) due to the configuration of the residual parcels remaining after MnDot's taking, subject to an agreement whereby this reduction will be assessed at the time of development if combined with adjacent parcels which would eliminate the configuration restriction to benefit. All other assessments as proposed under project #372 for both parcels, shall remain as proposed with the exceptions so noted in this recommendation. • COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS 40 SAC 1/16/86 L VII:' NEW; BUSINESS - A. PROJECT 427, YANKEE DOODLE RD - STREETS 8 STORM SEWER - ASSESSMENT OBJECTIONS 1. Don Sandberg (10-01600-010-26) BACKGROUND INFORMATION On October 15, 1985, the public hearing was held to discuss the proposed improvement under project 427 for Yankee Doodle Rd from T.H. 13 to Federal Dr. This improvement provides for the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Rd from a present two lane, rural ditch section to a four lane road with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities.. Enclosed on page(s) _21 is aletter submitted by Mr. Sandberg requesting consideration by the Special Assessment Committee pertaining to the amount of his related assessments under this project. Enclosed on pageso?� a G are maps showing the location of this parcel. Enclosed on page(s)o) 7 7 o is the proposed assessment roll identifying Mr. Sandbergs and the related street and storm sewer frontage calculations used for determining the amount of the assessments. Although Mr. Sandberg's property incorporates • 390 feet of frontage along Yankee Doodle Rd, it is presently homesteaded as a single family use by Mr. Sandberg. The future subdivision and development of this 7.5 + acres is greatly hampered by the protected wetland incorporating the middle one third of his property. Mr. Sandberg has requested consideration that his assessable frontage be reduced to take into consideration his present single family use and not the entire frontage due to the unlikelyhood of its future subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDAT There is a similar policy that has been used by staff in the past when an existing dwelling wanted to connect to a trunk utility adjacent to their frontage that had never been previously assessed. This normally occurs in situations where the private well or septic system has failed and they want to connect to the City system without changing the use of the property. If the following conditions could be met, the property would be .assessed for only a comparable single family residential frontage: 1. The parcel must be unplatted. 2. The parcel must have a net area of 3 acres (excludes all publicly dedicated right-of-way and ponding easements). 3. Must have a minimum of 200' of -frontage on the public right-of-way where the connection is being made. _ Due. tothe fact that Mr. Sandberg's property meets all of these qualifications and that his "connection" will be a driveway to ��0 SAC 1/16/86 Page 2 ® PROJECT 427 - Don Sandberg (10-016-010-26) a "trunk" street in lieu of the utility connection where this policy has been previously applied, it is recommended that Mr. Sandberg's assessment be reduced to a comparable single family frontage of 100 feet and that the additional assessments associated with the remaining frontage would be assessed at the time of rezoning or development to a higher use under Special Assessment Policy #82-1. E COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS /ff 11 SAC 1/16/86 A. PROJECT 427, Yankee Doodle Road - Streets & Storm Sewer 2. YD Associates (Parcels No. 10-27500-010-01 No. 10-00900-011-52 No. 10-00900-020-52) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the October 15, 1985, Council meeting, a public hearing was held for Project 427, which provided for the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road from T.H. 13 to Federal Drive from its present two-lane rural ditch section to a four -lane urban street with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities. Enclosed on page(s) J O —.3 / is the objection to the assessments for these three parcels as submitted by 'Mr. William Muske at that public hearing. Enclosed on page(s) 0 Z ^ NJJ is a map showing the location of these three parcels in the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Coachman Road. Also enclosed on page(s) p;�«-is the proposed final assessment roll showing the as- sessable footage for each parcel for its related street and storm sewer improvements. Mr. Muske contends that the assessments associated with these proposed improvements overburdens the property beyond the extend that it can be recovered through ® a future sale or development. STAFF RECOPM7ENDATION Due to the present zoning, anticipated. future use of this property and its corner location, staff feels that this property does benefit by the proposed improvements and that the assessments should remain as proposed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS 0 SAC 1/16/86 V11 NEW'BUSINESS B. PROJECT 447, LONE OAK ADDITION - TRUNK WATER MAIN (T.H. 149) 1. Willard Berfelz (10-03800-010-12) BACKGROUND INFORMATION On August 6, a public hearing was held for the installation of a trunk water main along T.H. 149 from Yankee Doodle Rd to T.H. 55 to provide additional water supply and pressure to the Lone Oak Addition (Northwest Airlines Corporate Headquarters) and the proposed Robins Addition adjacent to I-494 and T.H. 149. Enclosed on page 37 is the assessment objection as submitted by Mr. Berfelz requesting consideration by the Assessment Committee. Enclosed on pages 38 - 38-B are maps showing the location of Mr. Berfelz's property in relationship to the proposed improvement. Also enclosed on pages 39 - 41 are copies of the proposed final assessment roll showing the calculated assessable footage and related assessments. Although this property is presently used as a single family resi- dential dwelling, it is zoned light industrial (LI). Subsequently, the proposed assessment rate used in project 447 was at the commer- cial/industrial rate. Special Assessment Policy #82-2 (page 41-A) presently provides for this property to be assessed at its present use instead of its existing zoning if the property owner executes the required agreements (page 41-B). As can be seen on page 38-A, this property has a triangular confi- guration with an excessive amount of frontage along T.H. 149 in relationship to the size and depth of the parcel. Present Special Assessment Policies indicate that the assessable frontage for these types of lots should be the average of the front and rear footage (270 + 0)- 2 = 135 ft. If the assessable footage policy had been implemented and if the property owner executes the agreement document on page 41-B, the pending assessment could be reduced by existing policies as follows: Total Lateral Benefit Service Assessment 135 x 11.88/ff = $1,603.80 $620.00 $2,223.80 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS If the property owner executes the agreement for Special Assessment Policy #82-2, the staff recommends_ that the rate be reduced to the agricultural/single family rate. In addition, the staff recommends that the assessable footage be reduced to 135 feet in accordance with present policies. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS%COMMENTS a�� SAC 1/1'0/86 kIANNIHM, .10 ® C. PROJECT 404, LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION - UTILITIES (LEXINGTON AVFNr1E TRUNK WATER MAIN) 1. Patrick McCarthy (10-01500-013-76) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985, final assessment hearing before the City Council, Mr. Patrick .McCarthy submitted the written objection enclosed on page(s) 1,AJ pertaining to the assessments associated with the installation of the trunk water main along Lexington Avenue. Enclosed on page(s) VJ/-4(rare maps showing the location of the McCarthy parcel in relations ip to the trunk utility improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) Y & is the final assessment roll which shows the amount of the assessment determined from the calculated frontage and related assessable rates. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the fact that this 40 ± acre tract will require this trunk water main for internal looping when developed in the future, and taking into consideration that this property does not qualify for any reductions, credits or deferments that have not already been allocated, it is the staff's recommendation that the proposed final assessment be reaffirmed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS SAC 1/16/86 • D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER 1. Patrick McCarthy (10-02200-011-04 BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985, final assessment hearing held by the City Council for the above -referenced project, Mr. Arnold Kempe, attorney for Mr. Patric?5 McCarthy, submitted a written objection enclosed on page(s) J' pertaining to the assessments associated with the trun:c storm sewer installation through his property under that project. Enclosed on page(s) L%O-SI are maps showing the location of Mr. McCarthy's property in relationship to the proposed improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) sZ� is the final assessment roll identifying the proposed assessments and their related calculations. The acquisition of the permanent and temporary construction easements for the installation of this facility was negotiated as a part of the resolution of a special assessment appeal for a previous trunk storm sewer project on another parcel owned by Mr. McCarthy. As a part of these negotiations, considerable care and detail were given to insuring that the pond located on Mr. McCarthy's property would be provided with a storm sewer outlet into the storm sewer ® system at a location and elevation acceptable to him. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Due to the fact that the area proposed to be assessed under this project drains into the storm sewer system and that this property is not entitled to any additional reductions, credits or deferments that have not already been applied, it is the staff's recommendation that the assessments be reaffirmed as proposed. COMMITTEE/RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS z ©3 SAC 1/16/86 • D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER V 2. Don Vogtman (Lot 7 & N35 of 6, Block 1, Skovdale) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985, final assessment hearing held before the City Council, Mr. & Mrs. Vogtman submitted a written objection pertaining to the proposed assessments associated with trunk storm sewer under the above -referenced project. Enclosed on page(s) %s j/ is a copy of this submitted written objection. Enclosed on. page(s�S ','] are maps showing the location of this parcel in relat'onship to the proposed improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) fr is the proposed final assessment roll showing the assessment obligation and the related calculations of detemina- tion. On November 22, staff met with Mr. Vogtman to explain the benefits to his property and the observed drainage patterns resulting from the recent fill that has been placed on this property over the past several years, which has enhanced its ability to be developed in the near future. Due to the fact that Mr. Vogtman came about this property through a financial settlement and his lack of desire to develop this property, he wanted an op- portunity to express his concern to the Special Assessment Committee relating to these assessments. Due to the fact that this property is presently undeveloped and vacant, the "large lot" credit was not applied and the property was assessed based on its entire net area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Due to the .recent fill that has been placed on this property eliminating the previous low drainage basin and redirecting the drainage flow into the storm sewer system service by Project 411, it is the staff's recommendation that this property be determined as being benefitted by this improvement and that the assessment as proposed be reaffirmed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS SAC 1/16/86 D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER 3. Victor Staff (Lot 5, Block 1, Skovdale.2nd Addition BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 19, 1985, final assessment hearing before the City Council for the above -referenced project, an attorney re- presenting Mr. & Mrs. Staff submitted a written notice of appeal to the proposed speci 1 as essments. A copy of this appeal is enclosed on page(s) �_ Enclosed on pages ]p -JL are maps showing the location of this parcel in relationshi to the storm sewer improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) is the final assessment roll showing the amount of the assessments and the related calculations. In addition to the special assessment appeal action, Mr. & Mrs. Staff have also initiated an adverse condemnation action against the City pertaining to the taking of their property for ponding purposes under this project. On December 20, the City Attorney's office and City staff met with the property owners to discuss the City's .acquisition of a ponding and utility easement across their property and the explanation for the storm sewer area • assessment. The Committee will be updatedregarding the status of this acquisition and any relevance it may have pertaining to their special assessment appeal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Due to the fact that this property definitely benefits by the establishment of a controlled water elevation protecting their property from excessive flooding and that all appropriate credits, reductions and defermentsi have been taken into consideration, it is the staff's recommendation that the proposed final assessments be reaffirmed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS zo5 • D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH TRUNK STORM SEWER 4. Ron Boyle (10-02200-011-86 BACKGROUND INFORMATION PARK ADDITION/PATRICK SAC 1/16/86 EAGAN PARK — At the September 17, 1985 final assessment hearing for the above -referenced project held before the City Council, Mr. Ronald Boyle submitted a written objection to the trunk area storm sewer assessments for his parcel. Enclosed on page is the written objection submitted by Mr. Boyle. Enclosed on-page(s) 70 ' 7r are maps showing the location of the property in relationshi to the proposed improvements. Also enclosed on page (s) % 9 is the proposed final assessment roll with the related calculations. As the Committee may recall, similar type objections were reviewed by the Special Assessment Committee at the October 9, 1984, meeting as it pertains to neighboring property owned by Thomas Bergin, Thomas Rooney and Anthony Caponi. As a result of these neighboring objections and the relationship . of the property to the storm sewer improvements installed under Project 411, the City Council subsequently deleted these properties from ® the final assessment roll with the understanding they would be included with any future storm sewer project directly benefitting their property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the action taken by the Special Assessment Committee and City Council pertaining to similar objections of neighboring property owners under this same project, it is the staff's recom- mendation that the assessment against this parcel be deferred until some future project directly benefitting the property. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION/COMMENTS. C' SAC 1/16/86 VII.':NE W BUSINESS%` D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH. PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK TRUNK STORM SEWER 5. Lilian McCarthy (10-02200-010-02) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985 Final Assessment Hearing, a written objection was submitted by the attorney representing Lilian Mc Carthy for the trunk area storm sewer assessments proposed under the above -referenced project. A copy of that objection is enclosed on page(s) IF/ . Maps showing the location of this parcel in relationship to the project are enclosed on page(s) gr2. through Also enclosed on page(s) AS is acopy of the proposed final assessment roll showing how the amount was calculated. As can be seen, although the property incorporates 3.91 acres, only 1.5 acres were assessed at the agricultural/single family rate due to the "large lot" credit allocated this parcel. All drainage from this property directly enters Patrick Eagan Park where the storm sewer system was installed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Based on the fact that all drainage from this property enters the storm sewer system installed under Project 411 and that all available credits and reductionswere applied, it is the staff's recommendation that the assessment be reaffirmed as proposed. • COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS: 2o7 SAC 1/16/86 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY - PARKLAND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City is presently involved in the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 4448 which discusses the proposed trunk storm sewer outlet for the Holland Lake area along Cliff Road. The necessity of this storm sewer outlet is being dictated by the increased runoff associated with the development in the vicinity of Wilderness Run Road and Dodd Road. The estimated cost of this major trunk storm sewer project is approximately $900,000. Normally, the revenue necessary to finance these types of projects is derived from trunk area assessments over previously unassessed property within the benefitted drainage basin. In this particular project, the majority of the assessable area within this drainage basin incorporates the Lebanon Hills Regional Park under the jurisdiction of Dakota County. Although the entire regional park lies within the drainage basin that would ultimately be serviced by this trunk storm sewer lift station outlet, it would require interconnection of the several11akes and ponds within the par.'s. The map enclosed on page(s) Ox shows the relationship of the park property to the drainage area to the assessment area. • In calculating the assessment liability for the county park property, the agricultural/single family residential rate was used for the 429 acres directly tributary to the storm sewer outlet which resulted in a proposed assessment of approximately $300,000. Due to the fact that the City cannot legally assess another governmental entity, this revenue can only be derived through a cooperative agreement. Preliminary discussions with Dakota County indicate that they do not have the resources available to finance the estimated $300,000 assessment. Subsequently,_ they requested the City to see if any credits, special provisions, etc. can be applied to reduce their assessments to an amount that can be financially acceptable. The county staff has argued that the runoff generated from an undeveloped large regional park system is much less than agricultural or residential property. Subsequently, they feel a new rate classification should be established for parkland property which more accurately reflects the runoff generated and the subsequent .benefit received from any proposed storm sewer project. Enclosed on pages 8L through __9/ is a summary of the assessment issue as described by our consulting engineering firm. Enclosed on page(s) `J L is the present special assessment policy pertaining to trunk area storm sewer. Also enclosed on C' We$ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY -PARKLAND (continued) • on page(s) �7j is the present policy pertaining to parkland and other governmental jurisdiction property. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Runoff generated from parkland is dependent upon the amount of development associated with its use (active vs. passive). Most neighborhood and community parks are developed and maintained in a manner that generates a comparable amount of runoff as agricultural/single family residential property. However, larger county, regional and state parkland do not significantly increase the amount of runoff from its previous undeveloped passive condition. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation that consideration be given to establishing a new rate for large undeveloped passive parkland equal to one-half the agricultural/ single family residential rate. This reduced rate would be subject to the execution of an agreement with other jurisdictional agencies whereby additional assessments will be paid with any subsequent development or intensified use. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS L Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-six CONTRACT 8'6-3/PLANS/ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS/ASHBURY RD C. Contract 86-3, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Ashbury Road - Streets & Utilities) --On December 3, 1985, the Public Hearing was held to discuss the installation of streets and utilities for the construction of Ashbury Drive from the Blackhawk Glen Addition to Blue Cross Road. As a result of that public hearing, the Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications which have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review, approval and authorization to advertise for bids. These plans incorporate the changes that are anticipated with the addendum to this project's feasibility report (Project 454 Addendum) discussed earlier under the Consent Agenda. If, for some reason, these changes are not approved at the time of the Public Hearing, the contract documents have been set up to allow their deletion at the time of contract award. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the plans and specifications for Contract 86-3 (.Ashbury Road - Streets and • Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10.310 a.m. on Friday, February 28, 1986. ago MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ® FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 31, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Airport Noise Enclosed on pages 2/3 through 2-7-!5 for your review is a copy of the final report on the Governor's Task Force on Airport Noise. As the City Council is aware, Mayor Blomquist served as a member of this special Task Force that met since November 1985. Mayor Blomquist and Representative Seaberg have scheduled a meeting for Thursday, February 13, 1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building at which time local, county, regional and state elected officials will be invited to review a number of issues related to the airport noise problem. Also attached on page Z%(, is a copy of the official invitation that was sent out to all elected officials. Please mark your calendar for Thursday, February 13, to attend this meeting. ial Census Tabulation is Enclosed on pages 2 Z through Z 3 7i is a copy of a tabulation that provides detailed information from the special census that was conducted this past fall. Legal Newspaper Rates At the last City Council meeting, a question was raised regarding a comparative analysis of the two newspaper bids that were submitted at the organizational meeting for review. The. analysis was performed and a copy is enclosed on page -,7:53 for your review. Bicycle Plan Recently, a copy of a letter that was prepared for Mayor Blomquist to Dakota County was copied with each informative packet. Enclosed on pages 7- 3through 23-5 is a response from Dakota County regarding the bikeway plan and Mayor Blomqu'ist's letter. Enterprise Development Partnership Program Grant The City received news on January 24 from the Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board that the AVTI grant proposal that was written and submitted as a cooperative effort between AVTI and the City of Eagan was not funded. Those communities receiving grants were Bemidji, Crookston, Fergus Falls and the Iron Range communities. • HRA First -Time Home Buyer The City of Eagan was drawn as first-time home buyer monies through all one of the cities to receive the state lottery. Apparently, ®MEMO TO HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS JANUARY 31, 1986 PAGE TWO the City of Eagan was drawn third out of a number of applications that were submitted and will be assured of receiving 7, million dollars which depends on a tax exempt single-family mortgage financing issue. Proposed U.S. Postal Service Facility Enclosed on page 7_3 �, is a copy of correspondence from U.S. Senator Dave Durenberger to Mayor Blomquist regarding a response to the Mayor's letter expressing concerns about the location of the new postal data resource center. Organizational Meeting for Advisory Planning Commission At the January 28 APC organizational meeting, Pam McCrea was appointed Chairperson, Joe Harrison, Vice Chair, and Doris Wilkins, Secretary. Appointed to the Special Assessment Committee is Garrett Mulrooney, and the Developers Task Force - Lori Trygg. ®/s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jj 11 W/A • � January 27, 1986 The Honorable' Rudy Perpich 130 State Capitol St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Governor Perpich: Metr000litan Council 300 MetrO Square Building Seventh and Robert Sneers St, Paul, Minnesota 55105 ieieonone (612) 291-6359 Enclosed is the report of the Task Force on Airport Noise that you established in October, 1985. This interagency group examined the problem of aircraft noise in the communities surrounding Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport and evaluated potential solutions to this problem at the federal, sate, and local level. A program of solutions which was adopted unanimously is recommended to you in • the report. I would like to emphasize the key recommendation of the report, which is that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA),negotiate a phased compliance schedule to reduce airport noise. Many of the other recommendations could be implemented as elements of this compliance schedule. Since the Task Force adopted its report on January 9 two events have occured that are related to aircraft noise. The hearing examiner has issued a report on the proposed new M?CA noise regulations that delays their implementation. This ruling does not change my perspective that MPCA and MAC should begin negotiations since MPCA does have existing noise regulations in effect. • In addition, on January 23, Northwest Orient Airlines announced the acquisition of Republic A --Lines. This may offer the potential for noise relief due to less competition, but again, does not negate the need for negotiations between MAC and MPCA to go forward. The new Northwest should be involved in attenuation of aircraft noise. I would urge you to request the executive directors of the Metropolitan Airports COmmiSsic^ and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to imw2 iate'y begin negotiations on this compliance schedule and report back to you by June 1 on their progress. 7-/3 Governor Rudy Perpich January 27, 1986 Page 2 The members of the task force, who are listed in Appendix A of the report, represented state and metropolitan agencies, stage legislators, local units of government and citizens of the area. Through their interest and cooperation we were able to complete this report in an expeditious manner. It is my belief that the problem of airport noise can be alleviated through a continued cooperative effort by all the agencies involved to implement these recommendations. Sincerely, Sandra S. Gardebring Chair, Governor's Task Force on Airport Noise SSG/dof enclosure 0 0' 11 • REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON AIRPORT NOISE Adopted January 9, 1986 4 • Introduction Over the past two decades, the communities surrounding the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) have been seriously impacted by noise generated by the aircraft using the airport. In the past few years, the problem has become acute. This is principally because of increased aircraft operations resulting from Congress' decision in 1978 to deregulate the airline industry. At the time of deregulation, there were 9 airlines annually flying about 11 million passengers in and out of the airport. That was done with about 220,000 landings and takeoffs. Today, there are 34 airlines flying the same number of passengers; however, the landings and takeoffs have increased to 370,000. Many of the airlines operating at MSP are using older aircraft that are very noisy. One measure of the seriousness of the problem is the dramatic increase in citizen complaints. In July 1985, there were 1,252 complaints as contrasted with 823 in July of the prior year. Finding effective solutions to this problem is complicated by the fragmentation of authority over aircraft and airport operations at the federal, state, regional and local levels. In October, 1985 Governor Perpich authorized this interagency task force chaired by Sandra Gardebring of the Metropolitan Council. Members, who are listed in Appendix A, included representatives of the Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), State Planning Agency, legislators, Department of Transportation. and Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) as well as local units of government and citizens of the area. The specific charge of the task force was to evaluate • potential solutions available at both the federal and state level to the problem of aircraft noise at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport and to recommend specific proposals to the Governor for both short- and long-term solutions to the problems of airport noise. The task force met eight times between October, 1985 and January, 1986. Perspectives on the problem were presented by MAC, MPCA, the Metropolitan Council, the airline industry, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), state legislators and other interested groups such as the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) and South Metropolitan Airports Action Council (SMAAC). A presentation was heard on the legal constraints and fragmentation of authority between various levels of government. Since airport noise is a problem in many metropolitan areas around the country, solutions being tried in other cities were also examined. A list of 49 possible solutions were prepared and examined by the task force. This list was pared to the options presented in this paper. Emphasis was placed on controlling operations and noise levels rather than adding capacity to the airport. The basic premises of the Task Force in evaluating the range of solutions to the airport noise problem were as follows: Short-term noise reduction should be the primary goal of the Task Force. 2. Initiatives offering long-term relief are equally important and should be recommended, but are no longer sufficient in light of the current -•problemi 3. Legal questions should be considered, but should not be determinative of the recommended course of action. 4. Noise abatement is a multi -jurisdictional responsibility. 5. Noise reduction in one neighborhood should not be accomplished at the • expense of another. Assuming short-term noise reduction as a primary goal the task force did not consider construction of a new airport. A new airport has not been sited in the United States since the late 601s. Further; with the passage of the National Environmental Protection Act in the early 70's, the possibility of such a siting would at the very least be a long-term solution to the problem if it could be done at all. While not completely ruling out this option, it was felt that the task force's best efforts should be directed elsewhere. Background Much work has already been done on the issue of airport noise by several agencies and groups. In 1969 the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) was created as an advisory group by MAC. This was the country's first , successful attempt at bringing together industry representatives, citizens and the airport operator to develop noise abatement strategies. These strategies included creation of a preferential runway system to channel traffic over the Minnesota River and an industrial -commercial area of Eagan, voluntary nighttime restrictions on flights, and reduction of noise from engine.runups. These were significant steps which contained airport noise at a tolerable level for several years. However, there has been a dramatic increase in airline traffic into the Twin Cities since the airline industry was deregulated in • 1978. The traffic levels have substantially increased the duration of noise in affected areas and have decreased the amount of time the.preferential runway system can be used. Deregulation has .also allowed new carriers to enter the marketplace, often by purchasing used aircraft to avoid the substantial investments required for new planes. Prior to 1978 the used aircraft market in the U.S. was relatively inactive; now, however, retirement of an older, noisier airplane by one carrier does not often remove the plane from the national fleet. During the -summer of 1985 aircraft noise reached crisis proportions. A record number of complaints was received by the airport and citizens organizations, notably the South Metropolitan Airports Action Council (SMAAC) renewed their efforts to curtail noise. In addition to the work of this task force there are currently some special local efforts to deal with the problem. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency held public hearings on November 19'and 20 on proposed noise rules which would restrict the amount of noise emanating from aircraft using the airport. MAC is currently completing a voluntary Part 150 Study which has been underway for 2 years. The Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program prescribes the procedures and methodology for preparation of airport noise exposure maps and an airport noise compatibility program. Several of the recommendations in this report are also contained in the Part 150 Study, such as a noise budget, differential landing fees and a night curfew. The Part 150 Study will also seek to establish the environmental 40 capacity of MSP. Defining the airports environmental capacity will help shape the implementation of, and provide a legal basis for, many of the recommendations which follow. I • MAC Chairman, Ray Glumack, has proposed a 16-point program for dealing with the noise, some of which are included in this report. Task Force Recommendations The following recommendations are organized in sections according to the time frame of their noise improvement. Within each section there is no implied priority for individual strategies; they are all intended for implementation as a package. Immediate action on the recommendations in Sections 2-3 is needed even though actual noise reduction will occur at a later date. Recommendation 2 of Section 2, to work out a phased compliance schedule between MAC and MPCA to result in the reduction of airport noise, should be highlighted. This is a key recommendation since many of the other recommendations can be implemented as elements of this compliance schedule. These negotiations should begin immediately with a report made to the Governor by June 1 on their progress. This task force should also be re -convened to review this progress. For each recommendation, the agencies with primary jurisdiction and secondary responsibility are identified as well as a suggested procedure for carrying out the recommendation. SECTION 1 - TARGET: OPEN WINDOW SEASON • 1. Noise Budget -- Using the Logan Airport (Boston) Model, begin immediately to determine aggregate noise level in 1984 and issue an order to the airlines not to exceed this level. Airlines would be free to decide within this budget which planes to use and when (within 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. time frame). However, all would be bound by an allocated ceiling based on 1984 noise levels. After this initial single season rollback, ceilings would be structured in succeeding years to allow noise improvements each year. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Compliance Procedure -- MAC would establish the noise level and begin meetings with the 34 airlines to inform them of the ceiling and to discuss appropriate mechanisms to stay within the noise budget. The compliance schedule would also be negotiated with the airlines. Potential sanctions include loss of terminal space, loss of gates, others. MPCA could make implementation of a noise budget part of a compliance schedule to meet its standards (see Section 2, Strategy 2). 2. Limitations on corporate and private general aviation operations at Minneapolis -St. Paul (MSP) International Airport. No new facilities for general aviation (such as corporate hangars) would be -approved at MSP and incentives would be provided for non-essential users of MSP to move to satellite airports. • General aviation planes are relatively quiet., However, since the, Preferential Runway System is dependent on the total number of aircraft operations and because even environmentally sound aircraft contribute to that total, they•can have the effect of limiting the use of the Preferential Runway System. Combinin this recommendation with other 2(� attempts to limit noisy commercial flights, such as the noise budget, should insure that reducing general aviation flights does not merely open space for more commercial flights. • A program of legal limitations -at MSP and incentives to move to other airports could be implemented. Current efforts such as the installation of an instrument landing system at Airlake Airport and upgrading of St. Paul Downtown Airport are continuing and should show results soon. Further development of all reliever airports should continue into.the future. A minimum landing fee at MSP, regardless of weight, could be imposed immediately as an incentive to land elsewhere. MAC should actively advertise and promote general aviation use of its other airports. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan. Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Metropolitan Council, Legislature Compliance Procedure -- Policy decision to disapprove a request for new facilities at MSP would be made at the Commission level; Metro Council Policy Plan encourages development of reliever airports. The Council also oversees airport development through reviews of EIS's, master plans and MAC's capital improvement budget. This also may fall under proposed legislation to restrict expansion of airport. MAC would be responsible for creating incentives for general aviation to move to satellite airports. 3. Ban all training flights by ordinance, to take effect next summer when Airlake instrumentation is complete. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Compliance Procedure -- MAC would adopt ordinance. 4. Strict enforcement of noise abatement operation procedures and noise sensitivity training for pilots and air traffic controllers. Primary Agencies -- Metropolitan Airports Commission, FAA, Congress Secondary Agency -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Compliance Procedure -- the Metropolitan Airports Commission would become more proactive.and begin immediate meetings with the airlines and FAA, employer of the controllers, to determine appropriate compliance methods. 5. MAC should establish an aggressive 24 hour noise monitoring program at the airport to become more proactive on the noise issue. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Minnesota. Pollution Control Agency Compliance Procedure - MAC should act immediately to establish 24 hour monitoring by people, not -machines, for compliance with noise abatement procedures. People couldquickly respond and point out problems to the control tower for correction. • 71 f. 4 6. Differential landing fees based on noise level of individual aircraft, with • _ lower fees for quieter planes. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Legislature (noise tax) Compliance Procedure -- MAC would begin immediately to develop a process to significantly increase landing fees for noisier aircraft. Fees for major carriers could be increased in 1989 when contracts expire, although the contracts may not be binding if a nuisance or pollutant is created allowing the fee structure to.be changed sooner. Monies derived from this procedure could be dedicated to noise abatement activities. Fees have to be high enough to be a significant disincentive for noisier planes to use the airport. An alternative method would be setting a "noise tax" for take- offs and landings. 7. Additional nighttime restrictions (11 p.m. to 6 a.m. weekdays, 8 a.m. weekends) on all but Stage III aircraft.; There is currently a voluntary nighttime restriction honored by the airlines which keeps flights at a low level. However, there is a possibility the number of flights may grow, especially among general aviation such as cargo and charter flights. Primary Agency --'Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Compliance Procedure -- Immediate MAC action to set policy ban based on FAA Part 36 regulations which certify the sound levels of various planes. 8. Limit expansion of MSP facilities until noise abatement program is adopted. Primary Agency -- Minnesota Legislature. Rep. Ken Nelson and Sen. Mike Freeman are introducing bills which would limit expansion of MSP facilities unless such projects are consistent with noise abatement goals. Secondary Agencies -- Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (as part of a compliance procedure) Compliance Procedure -- If the Legislature does not limit expansion, MAC could voluntarily refuse to expand the airport. SECTION 2: MEDIUM RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS (2-5 YEARS) 1. Prepare for litigation involving the FAA with regard to the airport operator's authority to regulate the number of flights at MSP based on environmental capacity considerations. Primary Agencies -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Airports Commission, or other agency with standing. Compliance Procedure -- Research is currently being conducted on relevant • legal issues. *See Appendix H for definition of aircraft stages. Z2� E 2. Work out a phased compliance schedule between MAC and MPCA to result in the reduction of airport noise. This may incorporate noise reduction • techniques such as differential landing fees, noise budgets or land use compatibility guidelines. Primary Agencies -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Metropolitan Council Compliance Procedure -- Work on this agreement should begin immediately, with the agencies reporting to the Governor and this task force by June 1 on their progress. 3. Accelerate development of reliever airports to better serve general aviation. Improvements to St. Paul Downtown and Airlake are almost completed but ongoing improvements and amenities to the other airports will be needed to divert further traffic from MSP. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agencies -- Metropolitan Council and possibly state Legislature for change in current law regarding reliever airport improvement. Compliance Procedure -- Metropolitan Council should provide direction in its Aviation Policy Plan. The draft plan recommends an additional minor airport in western Hennepin County. MAC should continue improvements to other airports. do 4. Add an instrument landing system (ILS) to Runway 11L to allow better utilization and more precise higher approaches to this runway. Responsible Agencies -- Federal Aviation Administration, Metropolitan Airports Commission Compliance Procedure-- At the request of Congressman Martin Sabo funding for this improvement is included in the current transportation bill. 5. The Part 150 study currently being undertaken by MAC (with FAA, airline and local government participation) should be completed. This study is looking at the environmental capacity of the airport and will identify ways to curtail noise. Upon completion of this study, MAC will be eligible for federal funds to assist in a noise abatement program. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Federal Aviation Administration Compliance Procedure -- This study should be completed as soon as possible and submitted to the FAA. The study includes several options, some of which are recommended by this task force,; however, the task force has not reviewed or endorsed the complete study. 6. Adopt ban on further manufacture of Stage II aircraft and the import of new • or used Stage II planes from other countries." *See Appendix B for definition of aircraft stages. 1a� 6 Primary Agencies -- Federal Aviation Administration, Congress • Compliance Procedure -- Continued lobbying, possibly congressional action. T. Adopt a ban on any further extension of the Stage I operating cutoff date of January 1, 1988.* Primary Agencies -- Congress, FAA Compliance Procedure -- Continued lobbying, possibly Congressional action. Locally, MAC has adopted an ordinance cutting off use of MSP Airport by most Stage I aircraft already and.will ban all remaining Stage I aircraft after January 1, 1988. 8. Adoption and enforcement of Metropolitan Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines by all affected municipalities to prevent development of vacant land into noise sensitive uses. Primary Agencies -- Municipalities, Metropolitan Council Compliance Procedure -- Those municipalities which have not incorporated these guidelines into their comprehensive plans and zoning should do so immediately. Metropolitan Council should enforce Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Airport and FAA must maintain flight patterns upon which these land uses are based. • 9. Coordinated soundproofing plan where sound insulation is provided to schools and public buildings, and to homes on a voluntary basis, with full cost (depending on building location) provided by MAC or another designated agency. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Compliance Procedure -- MAC and Minneapolis should complete pilot insulation program as soon as possible and MAC should institute a continuing comprehensive plan of insulation in all affected municipalities funded through a differential landing fee, jet fuel tax or other sources. This insulation plan should be based on the F.A.R. Part 150 Study now being prepared. SECTION 3: POST -1990 1. A.ban on operation of Stage II aircraft should be adopted to be implemented by 1995. Primary Agency -- Federal Aviation Administration, Congress Compliance Procedure -- Continued lobbying by members of Task Force, possible Congressional action. • *See Appendix B for definition of aircraft stages. 122-'Z- 7 Zv 7 SECTION 4: OTHER POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS • Solutions identified in this section have been discussed by the Task Force and are passed forward without specific recommendation or endorsement. Some are actions already underway; others have not been endorsed by the Task Force due to a lack of information on their noise benefits. It is possible they should be considered after further information becomes available. 1. Implement extension of Runway 4/22. Completion of the environmental impact statement for this extension would provide the information needed to fully assess its potential for noise abatement and its economic impact. 2. Installation of a Microwave Landing System will allow curved and variable approach.paths, as well as varied glide slopes. Actual benefit_to noise levels requires further study. 3. Implementation of long-term comprehensive airport plans at all system airports by 1990. 4. Limited acquisition of homes in highest noise areas, preferably on a voluntary basis, by MAC or another agency, possibly with money from a Noise Abatement Trust Fund established with differential landing fees. 5. Tax reduction plan for houses impacted by aircraft noise. This has implications of selling airlines a license to make noise. The money that would be needed to reduce taxes may be better spent on actual reduction of noise. 6. Stricter compliance with Eagan departure corridor and three-mile turn rule would obtain maximum acoustical benefits from runway 11L and 11R. This is an operating procedure (part of the "preferential runway system") which previously had great benefits by concentrating aircraft approaches and departures over an industrial/commercial area of Eagan, rather than residential areas which surround the airport in most other directions. However, with increased traffic in recent years, these procedures decrease the amount of time runways 11L and 11R can be used, and increase the amount of traffic departing over South Minneapolis,, where planes can turn and be fanned out sooner than three miles. 7. MAC has passed, and is promoting among others, a resolution favoring limited re -regulation of the aviation industry to control noise (i.e., limiting the number of flights between two points); Minneapolis has also passed a similar resolution. NOISEI Z;� 3 8 • NIT r-Itu ®F acog 1� 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612)454-8100 January 30, 1986 MAYORS & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS REPRESENTING THE CITIES OF BURNSVILLE, EAGAN, INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, LILYDALE, MENDOTA AND MENDOTA HEIGHTS UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE BILL FRENZEL MINNESOTA STATE SENATOR HOWARD KNUTSON MINNESOTA STATE SENATOR CONRAD VEGA MINNESOTA STATE REPRESENTATIVE CHARLES HALBERG MINNESOTA STATE REPRESENTATIVE JAMES,METZEN DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER STEVE LOEDING DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER RUSS STREEFLAND DAKOTA COUNTY.COMMISSIONER JOHN VOSS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE RAY JOACHIM METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE MARY MARTIN Dear Fellow Elected Officials & Metropolitan Council Representatives: BEA BLOMQUIST MOVOI THOMAS EGAN JAMES A, SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Nembers THOMAS HEDGES CW A0miniSR010r EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city Clerk Representative Art Seaberg and I, along with Mayor Morrison, have discussed the importance of holding a joint meeting of elected officials to discuss recent measures that have been taken to address the growing airport noise issue. The special Governor's Task Force met and has presented a list of findings to Governor Perpich regarding airport noise. The findings of this committee would be most interesting to all of .you as elected officials. In addition, MASAC, MAC and the Environmental and Natural Resources Committee of the House of Representatives are all actively addressing the growing impact of airport noise. Since there are so many.different groups dealing with airport noise, it seemed appropriate that a meeting be scheduled at a central location to brief all elected officials on action that is being considered for the reduction and control of airport noise. A meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, February 13, 1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building. The time of the meeting is 7:00 p.m. and should last no later than 8:30 - 9:00 p.m. If you have staff or volunteer representatives within your community who are actively working on the airport noise issue, they are more than welcome to attend this briefing session. SincerelyAmquist Bea B1 Mayor BB/TLH/kf zZIO cc: Art Seaberg, State Rep THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 0 S O R R Y! It's six o'clock p.m. and the 'IBM Copier has completely ,broken down. We have tried everything to get it running again but it refuses to budge. The remainder of the Informative Memo will be sent out on Monday. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. .• Mai AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL FEBRUARY 4, 1986 6:30 P.N. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS �.� A. Fire Department t%iC. Park & Recreation Department B. Police Department WD. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA ?56 A. Contractor Licenses ,Mt B. Personnel Items �,��C. Landfill Abatement - Joint Powers Agreement 101.1 C. Project 414, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing .(Pine Ridge Drive - Streets) �y.ISE. Project 428, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Cedarvale Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) 9,15 F. Project 437, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 4th Addition — Streets do Utilities) PmyI`G. Project 438, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Place South - Streets) T5 -PH. Project 454 Addendum, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Ashbury Road) Amusement Device License for Slicers Pizza f3.17J. Project 84A, Final Acceptance (Kensington Place - Utilities) %9K. Project 465, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Rahn Ridge - Trunk Storm Sewer) L. Project 469, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Towerview Road) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS y5AAA. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road (Streets - Beau de Rue to Kings Road) x•56 B. Public Hearing for Project 463, Cliff Road (Streets - T.H. 3 to Inver Grove.Heights) T5.1 9Q6C. Public Hearing for Project 461, Yankee Doodle Road (Streets - 35E to Lexington Avenue) e�•c�D. Public Hearing for Project 452, Beryl Road (Storm Sewer Outlet) \ E. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Lot 5, Block 1� 2, Brittany 7th Addition) \TA F. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Wilderness Run 5th Addition) A. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview �. Meadows Addition) PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) H. Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian Road) Note: Will be continued to February 18, 1986, City Council meeting) Continued Final Assessment Hearing - Miscellaneous Appeals 1 (Continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) VI. OLD BUSINESS Pa\�A. Park Consultant Appointment and Fee Schedule Consideration 7 B. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Airport Noise Committee (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) /3e C. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Economic Development Commission (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) Appointments to the Gun Club Lake Watershed -Management Commission (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting) P/34 E. Sperry Proposal for New Marketing and Sales Facility j3L F. Reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit for Hong Wong Restaurant (Cedar Cliff Shopping Center) to Allow On -Sale Liquor License. G, On -Sale Liquor License for Hong Wong Restaurant - Cedar Cliff / Shopping Center 7 /5p H. Conditional Use Permit for Hardees Restaurant for a Drive - -Through Restaurant Facility and a Pylon Sign (continued from January 21, 1986, meeting), Lot 1, Block 1, First Minnehaha Addition Variance for a Two (2) Foot Sideyard Setback (Continued from 1 January 21, 1986, meeting) - Wesley Construction, Lot 3, Block 2, Sun Cliff 5th Addition VII. NEW BUSINESS PAZ- A. Fiscal 1985, Budgetary Adjustment /63 B. Preliminary Plat for a Single Family Home in Highview Acres (Remick Addition - Mark Remick) Located in Part of the Of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 4, North of Highview Park and West of Pilot Knob Road �•/)L C. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single Family Lots on 40 Acres and a Rezoning from A. (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) - Greensboro/Dave Gabbert, Located in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14,, North of Wescott Road and West of Lexington Avenue -p.19 6 D. Waiver of Plat (Pietsch Construction) Duplex Lot Split, Lot 7, II Block 1, Sun Cliff let Addition, NW 1/4 of Section 29 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1q& A. Review of League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies P/93 B. Review/Approve Special Assessment Committee Recommendation z/0 C. Contract 86-3, Approve Plans Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Ashbury Road) IR. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persona not on the agenda) e,. E. ADJOURNMENT. • • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two There are twelve (12) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSE A. Contractor License --Attached on page is a list of con- tractors who are renewing or who have bee selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: contractor licenses as presented. I To approve the list of FOR MONTH OF December 198 TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 1,520. Training 405 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 130 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 15 Administrative 399 Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating • On Leave Rookies TOTAL FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other 2,589 STATION #1 1 8 15 2 0 0 26 NUMBER 22 DATE. NAME LOCATION 0 2 7 5 0 36 12-26-85 Brown Tank 2875 Hwv 55 12-26-85 4130 Rahn Rd, #220 12-23-85 871 Wescott 12-20-85 540 Ctv Rd 30 12-14-85 Warren Esutis 720 O'Neal Drive 12-3-85 Barrell Recond.Mike Collins Drive STATION #2 11 3 15 3 0 0 22 $ LOSS $174,250 $174,250 LOX K Industry Apartment Farm (barn) House Commercial Industry STATION #3 10 2 0 0 17 $ LOSS $2,000 2,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 30,000 EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPAR7T-EENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF November 1985 • WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 630 Training 453 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 144 Station Maintenance 132 Fire Prevention 25 Administrative 234 TOTAL 1,618 W� MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 Chiefs 1 1 1 Available Days 8 4 4 Available Nights 15 15 10 Available Rotating 2 2 2 On Leave 0 0 0 0 0 0 Rookies TOTAL 26 22 17 FIRE/RESCUE TYPE NUMBER $ LASS Structure 9 8,500 Grass 1 Vehicle 4 4,000 False 3 Medical 7 Other 1 TOTAL 25 12,500 ® DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 11/23/85 Yankee Std. 31 & 28 Commercial 8,000 11-11-85 Cedar & 30 Car 4,000 15 'l® 24D, .� .. FOR MOMg OF October 1985 ii= PP3Z DWED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 4 9 0 ,rte 381 Truck i F)quipnent Maintenance 14 4 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 133 Administrative 419 TOTAL' 1,687 KNNPOWER Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating on heave Rookies FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other LARGE DOIdAR LOSSES DATE NAME 10-13-85 STATION #1 1 8 15 2 0 0 26 NUMBER 2 2 3 5 3 3 18 13 && Seneca STATION #2 1 4 15 2 0 0 22 $ LCSS :.150 4,500 $4,650 OCCUPANCY` Car CCS STATION #3 1 . 4 10 2 0 0 17 $ LOSS $4,000 EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE,DEPAFTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF September 1985 ® WORK PERFORMED TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 580 Training 422 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 149 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 22 Administrative 306 TOTAL MANPOWER Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave ® Rookies TOTAL paq-.42FA- 110 Structure Structure Grass vehicle False Medical Other TOTAL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME ® - none - 1,599 STATION #1 1 9 12 2 3 0 27 3 0 1 9 10 1 24 LOCATION C STATION #2 1 5 14 2 1 0 23 $ LOSS 0 OCCUPANCY" STATION #3 1 4 10 3 0 0 HU $ LCSS CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES FEBRUARY 4, 1986 1. B-E CONSTRUCTION, INC. 2. COLLEGE CITY CONSTRUCTION, INC. 3. CREATIVE ENERGY HOMES, INC. 4. KIN'S': CONSTRUCTION 5. MCAPPEL, INC. 6. TIMBERLINE BUILDERS HEATING/VENTILATING: 1. CENTRAIRE, INC. 02. DOODY, INC. 3. HARRIS WAIDINGER CORP. 4. EDWARD T. KOLAR & CO., INC. 5. LARSON-MAC COMPANY, INC. 6. LOOP BELDEN PORTER, INC. 7. MINNESOTA MECHANICAL, INC. 8. SNELLING MECHANICAL, INC. 0 7 WATER SOFTENER: 1. SURGE WATER CONDITIONING PLUMBING: 1. BRUCKMUELLER PLUMBING 2. DOODY, INC. 3. FARMINGTON PLBG & HTG. 4. HILTNER PLUMBING 5. D.R. MC DERMOTT PLUMBING 6. MINNESOTA MECHANICAL, INC. 7. JIM MURR PLUMBING & HEATING 8. NICKELSON PLBG & HTG., INC. 9. OLBERG CONSTRUCTION 10. PJ PLUMBING & HEATING 11. PROTECT PLUMBING 12. STANT PLUMBING & HEATING, INC. 13. SWANSON PLUMBING &.HEATING, INC. C Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three PERSONNEL ITEMS B. PERSONNEL ITEMS' There are nine ( 9) personnel items to be given consideration: 1. Consulting Inspector --The City has been retaining Mr. Elmer Borgschatz as a part-time Sign Inspector since November 1984. Mr. Borgschatz has surveyed and inventoried all signs within the community and was instrumental in the establishment of an administrative policy for the sign inventory. Mr. Borgschatz was employed during 1985 as a MEED employee which essentially means there was a reimbursement paid to the City for his rate of compensation. Dollars were budgeted for 1986 under Consulting Inspectors so that Mr. Borgschatz would now become a consultant to the City on a part-time basis. He will serve during 1986 at a rate of $5.00 per hour and work no greater than 1,040 hours. Mr. Borgschatz will provide his own transportation and be paid mileage at the current City mileage rate. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS MATTER: To approve the hiring of Elmer Borgschatz as a Consulting Sign Inspector for 1986. Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four 2. Engineering/Planning Secretary --After screening the approx- imately 30 applications for this position, seven finalists were given typing and secretarial tests. The seven finalists were also interviewed by Director of Public Works Colbert and Admini- strative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Judy Jenkins be appointed to fill the vacancy. Her official starting date in this position would be February 3, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Judy Jenkins as Engineering/Planning Secretary, the appointment to be effective February 3, 1986. 3. Building Inspector (General) --After screening the approximately 20 applications for this position, four finalists were interviewed by Chief Building Official Peterson, Assistant Building Official Reid and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommenda- tion that William Bruestle be appointed to fill this newly -created position. The appointment would be contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement and would be effective February 3, 1986. 04 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment • of William Bruestle as Building Inspector, the appointment to be effective February 3, 1986, and contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 4. Plumbing Inspector --Four applications were received for this fairly -specialized position, only two of which could meet minimum qualifications. Those two applicants were interviewed by Chief Building Official Peterson, Assistant Building Official Reid and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommenda- tion Dirk House be appointed to fill this newly -created position. The appointment would be contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement and would be effective February 3, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Dirk House as Plumbing Inspector, the appointment to be effec- tive February 3, 1986, and contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 5. Clerk -Typist (Pool) --Two positions are currently vacant in the typing pool. These include one, six -hour position and one, four-hour position. Seven applications were received and six applicants were given typing tests, communications and office procedures tests and were interviewed by Administrative Secretary Finnegan and Administrative 'Assistant Duffy. It is their recom- mendation that Liz Cain be appointed to fill the six -hour, vacant position. Her official starting date would be February 5, 1986, and would be contingent upon the successful completion of _the City's physical examination requirement. • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five 5. Clerk -Typist - Pool (Continued') --It is also their recommenda- tion that Nancy Graves be appointed to fill the four-hour, vacant position. Her official starting date would be February 19, 198'6, and would also be contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To, approve the appointments of Liz Cain to the six -hour, clerk -typist position and Nancy Graves to the four-hour, clerk -typist position, effective February 5 and February 19, respectively, and contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 6. Street Supervisor --After screening the 23 applications for this newly -created position, seven applicants were interviewed by Director of Public Works Colbert, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart, and Administrative Assistant Duffy. From the seven, three finalists were chosen. Those three finalists were interviewed by Director of Public Works Colbert, Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart and by two Public Works profes- sionals from other municipalities. It is their recommendation that Lance Lundsten be appointed to fill this newly -created position. His official starting date in this new position would be February 5, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Lance Lundsten as Street 'Supervisor, the appointment to be effective February 5, 1986. 7. Road Maintenance Worker --Since the appointment of Lance Lundsten as Street Supervisor creates a vacancy in the Road Maintenance Division for a Road Maintenance Worker, it will be necessary to advertise this vacancy. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ment of the Road Maintenance of this vacant position.' ITEM: To authorize the advertise - Worker position and the filling 8. Clerk -Typist (Parks/Building Inspection) --The City has received a notice -of resignation from Nancy Bryant, the current four-hour cierk-typist for Parks/Protective Inspections. Ms. Bryant submit- ted a two-week notice; her last day of employment with the City of Eagan will be January 31. -The Parks Department was authorized for a new, four-hour, clerk -typist position effective in 19'86. Authorization is needed, therefore, to advertise for an eight-hour clerk -typist for the Parks & Protective Inspections Departments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON .THIS ITEM: To authorize the advertise- ment for an eight-hour, Clerk -typist for the Parks & Protective Inspections Departments. Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six 9. Parks & Recreation Intern --The City has received a letter of resignation from the current Parks & Recreation Intern, Scott Mongan, effective January 29, 1986. Mr. Morgan has secured a permanent position in the parks & recreation management field in California. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To accept the resignation of Parks & Recreation Intern Scott Morgan, effective January 29, 1986. • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven E • LANDFILL ABATEMENT/JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT C. Landfill Abatement/Joint Powers Agreement --During 1985 a City Council decision was made to expand the pilot program for compost material by purchasing a portable wood chipper and providing manpower for the compost site directly south of the Municipal Center Building. The City also held a clean-up day at which time residents were encouraged to bring recyclables to this location. The total cost of the portable wood chipper was $10,300 along with all other expenses, including materials for promotion of the City's recycling, recapture of in house personnel expenses and other related costs, the total expenditure was $17,328. The City expects to receive $5,264 as a grant from the Metropolitan Council and $10,528 through the Household Rebate Program through Dakota County. The Joint Powers Agreement is a 10 page document which the City must execute in order to qualify for the $1 per household that is available to municipalities within Dakota County. The Agreement allows Dakota County to impose a tipping fee or surcharge on operators of facilities for mixed municipal solid waste. The fee in the metropolitan area cannot exceed $.25 per cubic yard. Dakota County has agreed that they would initiate this surcharge and therefore have created a fund called the Landfill Abatement Fund that allows for municipalities to apply for assistance to help fund any recycling programs not to exceed $1 per household as mentioned. If any member of the City Council would like to review the Agreement in more detail a copy would be made available and be sent out with the Administrative Packet. Enclosed on pages 3 through ]t is a cost breakdown of the in house and out-of-pocket expenses for the Landfill Abatement Program. The Joint. Powers Agreement between Dakota County and the City has been discussed on two (2) previous occasions by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a final draft of the Joint Powers Agreement between Dakota County and the City of Eagan. It provides language to deal with the Landfill Abatement Funding assistance. /z CITY OF EAGAN -1985 LANDFILL ABATEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES EXPENDITURES 1. Personnel (Program 4370) a. Planning & Administration John Hohenstein - 56.5 hrs. x $9.50/hr. _ $ 536.75 Scott Morgan - 207.5 hrs. x $6.00/hr. _ $1,245.00 SUBTOTAL: $1,781.75 B. Maintenance /3. Tom Schuster - 8 hrs. x $11.56/hr. _ $ 92.48 Don Buecksler - 6 hrs. x $11.11/hr. = 66.66 Steve Taylor - 2 hrs. x $11.56/hr. _ $ 23.12 SUBTOTAL: $ 182.26 C. Site Monitor Sharon McNeely 60 hrs. x $ 4.50/hr. _ $ 270.00 William Reid 49 hrs. x $ 4.50/hr. _ $ 220.50 SUBTOTAL: $ 490.50 TOTAL PERSONNEL: $2,454.51 • 2. Site Development a. Grading site - Acct. 401-4385-394-32 Mies Excavating - 1st payment = $ 538.50 2nd payment = $3,051.50 TOTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT: $3,590.00 3. Equipment a. Portable wood chipper - Acct. 1101-4580-.394-32 $10,300.00 TOTAL EQUIPMENT: $10,300.00 4. Materials a. Compost center signs - Acct. 1101-4236-394-32 Earl F. Anderson $ 661.32 b. Postage for recycling survey - Acct. 401-4321-030-02 Postmaster - $ 100.00 . Postmaster - .-$ 15.00 SUBTOTAL: $ 115.00 c. Kerosene heater for center shelter bldg. Warners Hardware - $ 6:1.86 td. Tarps used to transport leaves - Acct. 401-4220-394-32 Northern Hydraulics - 14.90 /3. e. Site supplies - Acct. 1101-4210-370-32 • Hardware Hank (racks, trash bags, flashlight) October - $ 10.54 November - $ 19.90 SUBTOTAL: $ 30.44 TOTAL MATERIALS: n LJ .• 5. Other - Acct. a. Cleanup day Beerman Services - Acct. 1101-4430-394-32 b. Conference University of MN - Acct. 1101-4411-030-02 TOTAL OTHER: TOTAL DOCUMENTED E%PEDITU PROJECTED REVENUE (GRANTS) 1) Metropolitan Council Household Rebate Program $ 5,264.00 2) Dakota County Household Rebate Program 10,528.00 TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE: $ 883.52 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 $ 100.00 $17,328.03 $15,792.00 • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Eight Memo Ci'ty Council Meeting PROJECT 414, FINAL ASSMT. ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/PINE RIDGE DRIVE D. Project 414, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Pine Ridge Drive - Streets) --Construction has been completed, fin,il costs tabulated and the final assessment roll has been prepared for the street reconstruction of Pine Ridge Drive in the Timberline Addition under Project 414. It is recom- mended that this final assessment roll be received and that a public hearing be scheduled for March 4, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 414 (Pine Ridge Drive - Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on March 4, 1986. PROJECT 42'8, FINAL ASSMT. ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/CEDARVALE INDUSTRIAL PK E. Project 428, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Cedarvale Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) --Construction • on this major trunk storm sewer facility through the Cedarvale Industrial Park is approximately 90% complete. Due to the fact that all assessments associated with this project ,are for trunk area at predetermined rates, it is appropriate to proceed with the final assessment hearing. Therefore, it is recommended that this final assessment roll be received and that a public hearing be scheduled for March 4, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 428 (Cedarvale Industrial Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) and order the final assessment hearing to be held March 4, 1986. PROJECT 437, FINAL ASSMT. ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/WINDTREE 4TH ADDN. F. Project 437, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Windtree 4th Addition - Streets & Utilities) --All construc- tion has been completed, final costs .tabulated and the final assessment -rolls prepared for the installation of streets and utilities servicing the Windtree 4th Addition. Therefore, it is recommended that these assessment rolls be received and that a public hearing -be scheduled for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To .receive the final assessment roll for Project 437 (.Windtree 4th Addition - Streets • & .-Utilities) and schedule the final assessment hearing to be held on March 4, 1986: /6' Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine PROJECT 438, FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/PUBLIC HEARING/LEXINGTON PLACE S G. Project 438, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Lexington Place South - Streets) --All construction has been completed, final costs tabulated and the final assessment rolls prepared for the installation of streets within the Lexington Place South Addition (Project 438). Therefore, it is appropriate that these assessment rolls be received and that the final assess- ment hearing be scheduled for March 4, 1986, for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 438 (Lexington Place South - Streets) and order the final assessment hearing to be held on March 4, 1986. PROJECT 454 ADDENDUM, RECEIVE REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/ASHBURY RD H. Project 454 Addendum, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Ashbury Road) --On December 3, 1985, the public hearing was held to discuss the installation of streets and utilities within Ashbury Drive from the Blackhawk Glen Addition through the Blue Cross property to Blue Cross Drive. Subsequent to that public hearing and project approval, further analysis of the project has resulted in required revisions or additions to that project resulting in changing the preliminary assessment roll presented at that public hearing. Therefore, staff has prepared an addendum to that report identifying these changes/additions and is recommend- ing that a new public hearing be held to protect the city's ability to assess these additional costs as a part of this project. Some of the changes relate to both controlled water and flood elevations for the various ponds to be interconnected by the storm sewer system. The additions pertain to a continuation of the sidewalk from the Blackhawk Glen Addition to Blue Cross Road under this project. Also, the developers of the Blackhawk Glen Addition and Blue Cross/Blue Shield have reached an agreement whereby the excavation and placement of some of the fillwill be to the advantage of one landowner thereby reducing the cost to the other. All these issues will be discussed in detail in the addendum to the feasibility report which will be reviewed at the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the addendum report for Project 454 and order a public hearing to be held on March 4, 1986. A4 • • • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Ten Memo City Council Meeting AMUSEMENT DEVICE/SLICER•''S PIZZERIA I. Advance Carter for Amusement Device for Two Machines at Slicer's Pizzeria --Norman Pink representing Advance Carter Company has made application for two (2) amusement device licenses at Slicer's Restaurant. The two machines are Ms_ Pacman and Pole Position. Mr. Pink's application is in order for consideration. y ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amusement device license for ,Norman Pink representing Advance Carter Company for the Slicer's Restaurant at 2113 Cliff Road. 0 PROJECT 84A, FINAL ACCEPTANCE/KENSINGTON PLACE J. Project 84A, Final Acceptance (Kensington Place - Utilities) - The utilities necessary to service the Kensington P1ace.Addn. have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public Works Department and our consulting engineering firm and found to be in compliance with the approved plans and specifications. Subsequently, the staff is recommending that these utilities be formally accepted by the City for, perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final acceptance of utilities installed under Project 84A, Kensington Place, for perpetual maintenance by the City. Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Eleven Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 46'5/FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING/KAHN RIDGE K_ Project 465, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Rahn Ridge - Trunk Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition received from the developers of the Rahn Ridge Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council. for consideration of scheduling a public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the feasibility report for Project 465 (Rahn Ridge - Trunk Storm Sewer) and order the public hearing to be held March 4, 1986. PROJECT 469/PETITION/FEASIBILITY REPORT/TOWERVIEW RD L. Project 469, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Tower - view Road - Streets) --We have received a petition from the de- velopers of the LeMay Lake Hills (Martin Shields) requesting the upgrading of Towerview Road from Quarry Lane to Pilot Knob Road. As the Council may recall, the upgrading of Towerview Road was a condition of the preliminary plat ,approval for the LeMay Lake Hills Addition which was considered by the City Council on September 17, 1985. All costs associated with the preparation of this report have been guaranteed by the developer in case the project is not approved at the time of the public hearing. • LJ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 469 (Towerview Road - Streets). 19 • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 19186, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 460/NICOLS ROAD (STREETS) A. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road '(Streets - Beau de Rue to Kings Road) --In response to the rapidly deteriorating condition of Nicols Road and the pending turnback of this county road to the City of Eagan, Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on January 7, 1986, in consideration of scheduling a public hearing to be held on February 4. A copy of the feasibility report is enclosed on pagesc,�through-SS .Because this project will affect all property owners adjacent to this roadway either through proposed assessments, easement acquisition or construction inconvenience, a special neighborhood meeting was held at City Hall on January 29th. Nineteen individuals attended this informa- tional meeting and expressed concerns pertaining to the following items: a. Location and/or need for the proposed 8' bituminous trail along the east side. b. The need for a four -lane roadway between Cliff and Diffley Roads. C. The proposed assessments. d. The negative impact of future commercial development and related increased traffic volumes. As a result of this informational meeting, it was also discovered that several property owners were inadvertently omitted from the proposed assessment roll and/or public hearing notification list. Therefore, in order to protect the City's ability to assess the benefited property owners, it will be required to continue this public hearing to allow a revised pending assessment roll and new public hearing notifications to be processed. However, those property owners that have been affected by these omissions have been so informed and encouraged to attend the February 4th public hearing. Therefore„ the continua -tion should only be a formality before formal action is taken on this project. The Assistant City Engineer, who was instrumental in the prepara= tion of this feasibility report,' will be conducting the public hearing. The Public Works Director will also be available to answer any questions and concerns that arise from this public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive comments and continue the public hearing for Project 460 (Nicols Road - Streets from Beau De Rue -Drive to Kings Road) to February 18, 1986. • `� CITY OF EAGAN /If PUBIC WORKS DEPARTMENT V\ ENGINEERING DIVISION I I Mf RESORT Ll NIC0�5 ROCU STREET IIiPROfE�BVTS Approved by-� Viihl�iir Works Department/Date Council Approval: 0 Date ®F aaga 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONES (612) 454-8100 JANUARY 7, 1986 HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN MN 55121 Re: Nicols Road Street Improvements Pro3ect No. 460 Dear Mayor and Council: BEA BLOMOUIST Morar THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Admimllator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On. August 20, 1985 Council directed the Public Works Engineering Division to study the feasibility of upgrading Nicols Road to city standards for a 9 ton collector street. The Engineering Division analyzed the existing conditions and future needs of Nicols Road to determine the proposed improvements necessary to bring it to city standards. This report presents the results of the analysis and recommends the improvement of Nicols Road at an estimated cost of $1,178,816.00. The following report includes discussion of Nicols Road's existing conditions and proposed improvements, necessary easements/permits, assessment and construction areas, financing, detailed cost estimates, preliminary assessment roll and estimated project schedule. I will be present at the February 4, 1986 public hearing to explain this project and answer any questions the Council or public may have. Si�Y, Richard M. H ti Assistant City Engineer RMH:jh I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the Sta of Minnesot Richard M. He DATE: January 7. 1986 'Reg. No -14973 THE LONE OAK TREE. _ .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY • PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS FEASIBILITY REPORT PURPOSE The purpose of this feasibility report for Project 460 is to investigate the upgrading of Nicols Road to City standards. The City Council authorized preparation of this feasibility report on August 20, 1985, and assigned its preparation to the Public Works Engineering Division. SCOPE The scope of Project 460 is to upgrade Nicols Road to City collector street standards. The limits of this project are from Kings Road to Beau D' Rue Drive. This report discusses existing conditions of Nicols Road, proposed feasible improvements, easement acquisition, assessment and construction ® areas, methods of financing and contains .a preliminary assessment roll. EXISTING CONDITIONS Nicols Road, previously known as Old Cedar Avenue, is presently a two-lane rural road under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Dakota County is planning to turn back Nicols Road to the City's jurisdiction in 1986. The Master Thoroughfare Plan identifies Nicols Road as a community collector street from Cliff Road to Beau De Rue Drive and a neighborhood collector street fr6m Kings Road to Cliff Road. In order to better determine the upgrading of Nicols Road, the City must first examine its existing conditions. The following discusses the existing roadway section, traffic, utilities and land uses. 1. Roadway Section: The rural roadway section consists of a 24' wide ® bituminous surface, gravel shoulders and ditch drainage. According to Dakota County, they graded Nicols Road in 1935 and surfaced it in 1942. They have -no ® record as to when Nicols Road was overlaid, however, they estimate it was around 1962. Clearly, severe map and alligator cracking along the entire length of this project indicates the pavement life has been exceeded. An existing 20' wide bituminous surface frontage road abuts the east side of Nicols Road between Shale Lane and Marble Lane. Soil borings taken indicate areas of poor subsoil. The majority of poor subsoil lies between Diffley Road and Beau De Rue Drive. The borings also indicate isolated pockets of poor subsoil between Cliff Road and Diffley Road at low spots. 2. Traffic: The 1983 average traffic volumes of vehicles per day for each major section of Nicols Road are: Kings Road to Cliff Road - 1,250 Cliff Road to Diffley Road - 2,500 Diffley Road to Beau D' Rue Drive - 4,100 Signalized intersections exist at Cliff Road and Diffley Road. The Dakota County Highway Department is responsible for operation of these signals. 3. Utilities: The 16" water main along the west side of Nicols Road is 45' west of centerline. This will be outside the future street surface. Also, the water main was buried to suit future design grades for Nicols Road. The sanitary sewer and storm sewer locations are outside the future street surface. 4. Land Use: About 82% of the land abutting Nicols Road is either MnDOT right-of-way or platted. Of the platted areas, the following remain to be developed: • a3 ® 24 Ac. -Mari Acres 2nd Addition, except Lot 3, Block 1 10 Ac. -Lot 19, Block 8, Cedar Grove No. 2 7 Ac. -Cedar Ridge 2nd Addition and Lot 2, Block 1, of the 1st Addition 4 Ac. -Outlot A of Peaceful Heights Addition All of these areas are zoned for commercial use. The zoning or guide use for the remaining 18% of undeveloped area is split about evenly between R-1 and commercial. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Due to Nicols Road present deteriorated condition and large existing traffic volumes, the Engineering Division recommends reconstruction of Nicols Road to 9 -ton standards to suit future projected traffic volumes, estimated between 8,000 and 16,000 vehicles per day. The reconstruction of Nicols Road to ® collector street standards will include:. 1. 32'-52' wide bituminous 9 -ton urban street section with concrete curb and gutter. 2. 8' bituminous trail along east side. 3. Storm sewer laterals. 4. Traffic signal modifications. 5. Beau De Rue Drive and Nicols Road intersection realignment. 6. Miscellaneous utility modifications. 7. Detour. 1. Typical Street Section: The Engineering Division recommends the following various street widths to handle existing and anticipated future traffic: a. 52' - from Cliff Road to about 600' north of Diffley Road b. 48' - from Cliff Road to about 900' south of Cliff Road ® c. 44' - Nancy Circle to about 900' south of Cliff Road - about 600' north of Diffley Road to Beau De Rue Drive d. 32' - from about Kings Road to Nancy Circle p2 (a) The 52' width is the minimum State Aid standard for 4 traffic lanes. The two traffic lanes in each direction will allow vehicles to make both left and right turns without greatly affecting through traffic. Staff believes most of the traffic and turning movements will occur between Cliff Road and Diffley Road. Staff recommends extending this width about 600' north of Diffley Road to provide adequate distance for north bound traffic to merge to the two-lane 44' width. This will also provide adequate distance for traffic to diverge in two lanes for left and right turning movements at the Diffley Road intersection. Staff does not feel that continuing the 52' width to Beau De Rue Drive is necessary because: -limited turning movements due to: ® o limited commercial property requiring future accesses o only two "T" street intersection - 52' width not suited for parallel parking (b) Staff recommends a 48' width section south of Cliff Road for about 9001. This will provide for four traffic lanes past the commercially zoned property along Nicols Road. Staff feels this width is adequate for this section of street for the following reasons: - Lesser traffic volumes than north of Cliff Road - Short length - Non -State Aid classification (c) Staff recommends the 44' width section from where the 48' width section ends to Nancy Circle and from about 600' north of Diffley Road to Beau De ® Rue Drive. This section will provide for 2 traffic lanes with paral-lel a5' LI parking along both sides. The parking ,lanes can double as right-hand ® turn lanes and for emergency stopping or disabled vehicles. This will also assist in the transition to a 32' street on the south end and a 24' rural section street on the north end. (d) The 32' width section from Nancy Circle to Kings Road will be adequate considering the residential nature of the area and lower traffic volumes. The typical pavement section based on existing subsoils with an R value of 30 and projected traffic volumes will be: 1-1/2" 2341 Bituminous Wear Course 1-1/2" 2331 Bituminous Binder Course 1-1/2" 2331 Bituminous Base Course 8 " Class 5 Aggregate Base Course ® Because some areas along Nicols Road have poor subsoils, some subgrade correction will be necessary. This will require either excavation of the poor subsoils and backfilling with good aggregate materials or use of soil stabilization materials such as geotextile fabrics. Excavation and backfilling methods will be assumed for this report. Staff will determine the most cost effective alternative during detailed design. 2. Bituminous Trail: City standards for collector streets require the - installation of an 8' trailway. The logical location for this trailway is along the east side of Nicols Road. The Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition already constructed a portion of this trail under Project 415. The trailway construction will consist of a 2" bituminous. surface over a 4" aggregate base. 3. Storm Sever Laterals: Trunk storm sewers are in place along Nicols Road. However, the upgrading to an urban street section will require the installation of several catch basins and storm sewer leads to connect to the trunk lines. This construction will eliminate �&the unsightly east ditch south • of Beau De Rue Drive. 4. Traffic Signal Modifications: This project will require adding loop detectors and possibly making some adjustments to critical handhole boxes. Staff does not anticipate having to relocate any signal poles. Dakota County will provide design assistance for any signal modifications. 5. Beau De Rue Intersection Realignment: This project provides the City with the opportunity to realign the Beau De Rue Drive intersection with Nicols Road. The current alignment makes right turns from Nicola Road into the proper lane on Beau De Rue Drive very difficult for small vehicles and impossible for large trucks and semi -trailers. Staff recommends increasing the radius for the right turns onto Beau De Rue Drive to solve the existing turning problem. ® 6. Miscellaneous Utility Modifications: This project also provides the opportunity for the City to make some minor utility modifications. Some of the modifications would include: 1) Install separate 1" water services to 4 existing homes presently being served by a single 3/4" line, Lots 8-11, Cedar Grove No. 1. 2) Install a manhole at the end of a sewer line near Lot 11, Cedar Grove No.. 1. 3) Relocate hydrants along the old frontage road between Co. Rd. 30 and Carnelian Lane. 4) Stub 1-1/2" water service to parcel 060-04. 5) Stub 6" water service to Rahn Park and between parcels 030-04 and 050-04. i7. Detours: This project necessitates the closing of various portions -of Nicols Road to through traffic to facilitate street construction. Because Nicols Road provides the only access to the area south of Cliff Road, the �7 ® contractor will have to maintain access at all times to the businesses and residences. However, the Rahn Ridge Addition will provide access to Vienna Woods from the east. The streets within this new subdivision will be open to traffic by July 15, 1986. The City can close the section of Nicols Road between Cliff Road and Beau D' Rue Drive and provide a detour route using the Cedar Avenue Freeway and Rahn Road. Staff recommends not closing the section between Cedar Ridge Circle and Cliff Road until July 1 because the owner of Jerry's Nursery expressed concerns to staff that the month of May and June are crucial to his business. Staff will require the contractor to maintain local access. The City will need to acquire some additional permanent highway easements and 7 some temporary construction easements_ from the following parcels: ® PERMANENT EASEMENTS TEMPORARY EASEMENTS Section 31 Cedar Cliff Addition 030-04 0.02 AC Blk 1, Lt 1 0.05 AC 050-04 0.02 AC Blk 6, Lt 6 0.05 AC 060-04 0.02 AC Section 19 Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition 010-12 0.01 AC Blk 1, Lt 1 0.04 AC Blk 1, Lt 2 0.05 AC Blk 1, Lt 3 0.09 AC Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 0.04 AC Section 30 • 010-29 0.12 AC Dakota County may require permits for work within their right-of-way at p. Diffley Road and Cliff Road intersections. 7 U 0 Also, staff anticipates requiring a DNR permit to place fill along portions of the east side of Pond AP -9 (DNR Protected Wetland #158W). Preliminary estimates are that the widening of Nicols Road will require filling approximately 0.2 AC of this DNR designated water. This minimal filling will not adversely affect any of the hydraulic characteristics of this pond. ASSESSMENT AREA a CG e — Section 19 e Cedar Grove #3 e e Blk 8, Lts 1-4 e Cedar Grove #1 e e Blk 2, Lt 12 e e e e 011-54 e e 011-55 e Peaceful 010-29 i AREA ONLY Cedar Grove #3 Blk 1, Lt 1 Cedar Grove #1 Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Blk 2, Lts 1-11 Cedar Grove #2 Blk 8, Lt 18 Cedar Grove #4 Blk 6, Lts 1-11 & 17 Blk 7, Lt 17 Cedar C1iff.Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 6, Lt 1 Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Blk 2, Lts 1-3- �� Section 30 e Cedar Grove #2 e e 190-08 & 191-08 e e Cedar Grove #4 e e Blk 6, 12-16 e 1 011-25 e e 020-25 e e 030-25 e e 011-27 e e Heights Addition e e Outlot A e e Blk 1, Lt 1 e e e Peaceful 010-29 i AREA ONLY Cedar Grove #3 Blk 1, Lt 1 Cedar Grove #1 Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Blk 2, Lts 1-11 Cedar Grove #2 Blk 8, Lt 18 Cedar Grove #4 Blk 6, Lts 1-11 & 17 Blk 7, Lt 17 Cedar C1iff.Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 6, Lt 1 Cedar Cliff 2nd Addition Blk 1, Lts 1-3 Cedar Cliff 3rd Addition Blk 2, Lts 1-3- �� U ASSESSMENT AREA Cedar Ridge 1st Addition Blk 1, Lts 1 & 3 Blk 2, Lt 1 Mari Acres Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Mari Acres 2nd Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 3, Lts 1 & 2 012-76 (Rahn Park) Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition Blk 1, Lt 1 Blk 2, Lt 1 CONSTRUCTION AREA ONLY 30 Section 31 Flour Bin International 1st Tousignants Addition 1 Addition Blk 1, Us 1 & 6 1 Blk 1, Lt 1 010-06 _ 1 030-04 050-04 060-04 1 020-06 e 0 Durning's Subdivision 1 Lt 1 & 2 :Cedarviewj Addition Blk 1, Lt 1-3 30 ® FINANCING Staff estimates this project will cost $1,178,816. Appendix A contains a detailed breakdown of the estimated costs. This figure includes 5% contingency and 25% overhead for administration and legal expenses. This does not include any costs for easement acquisition. The funding to finance the estimated project cost will come from the following sources: 1) Special Assessments. 2) County Turn Back Funds. 3) Municipal State -Aid Funds. 4) Major Street Fund. property's zoning and use. The different rates estimated for this project are: 1) Commercial/Multiple. . . . . . . . $78.45/ff 2) Full Residential . . . . . . . . $33.75/ff 3) Half Residential . . . . . . . . . $16.88/ff Based on these rates, staff estimates revenues of $746,927. Appendix,B contains a preliminary assessment roll identifying the benefitted property and listing proposed assessments. 1. Commercial/Multiple Rate: This rate proposes to include all street construction costs to build a 44-52' 9 -ton urban street, 50% of the grading, and the 8' trailway. The retaining wall construction cost is assigned to be part of the grading costs. Staff proposes assessing this rate to school; commercial; .limited, neighborhood, or general business; and multiple zoning classifications. 3 / Special Assessments: Staff proposes to assess benefitted properties adjacent ® Nicols Road in accordance with City policy at a front foot rate based upon the property's zoning and use. The different rates estimated for this project are: 1) Commercial/Multiple. . . . . . . . $78.45/ff 2) Full Residential . . . . . . . . $33.75/ff 3) Half Residential . . . . . . . . . $16.88/ff Based on these rates, staff estimates revenues of $746,927. Appendix,B contains a preliminary assessment roll identifying the benefitted property and listing proposed assessments. 1. Commercial/Multiple Rate: This rate proposes to include all street construction costs to build a 44-52' 9 -ton urban street, 50% of the grading, and the 8' trailway. The retaining wall construction cost is assigned to be part of the grading costs. Staff proposes assessing this rate to school; commercial; .limited, neighborhood, or general business; and multiple zoning classifications. 3 / ® 2. Full Residential Rate: This rate proposes to include construction costs for a typical 32' residential street and 25% of the grading. Staff proposes assessing this rate to church and park zoning. 3. Half Residential Rate: Staff proposes using this rate for existing single family or agricultural zoned property obtaining direct driveway access to Nicols Road. The Council should determine the length of time for spreading the assessments at the time of the public hearing. City policy for establishing the interest rate is based upon the interest rate paid by the City from the sale of the general obligation bonds necessary to finance these improvements. Frontage Road Equivalent: The City originally designated this rate under ® Project 306 with the Diffley Road reconstruction. This rate pooled all lots taking access from the Diffley Road frontage roads together with those lots from Project 342, Cedar Grove 1 & 2 Street Reconstruction, to establish a per lot assessment. Residents along Nicols Road, between Diffley Road and Carnelian Lane, were included because they petitioned for removal of, that frontage road and extension of their driveways to Nicols Road. Because of that previous assessment, the City will not be assessing them under this project. The City proposes no new improvements to the frontage road along Cedar Grove No. 2 & 4 Additions under this project. Because Cedar Grove 2 & 4 Additions do not have direct access to Nicols Road, the City will not be assessing those residential properties under this project. ® County Turn Back Funds: The turn back procedure requires Dakota County to place a 2" overlay on Nicols Road (Co. Rd. 23) prior to turning it over to the City. Rather than do this and then tear up all the bituminous with this - 3� APPENDIX A NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE ITEM DESCRIPTION Remove Concrete Curbing Salv Pipe Culvert Salv CB Castings Common Excavation Topsoil Borrow, CV Salv Topsoil to Stkpile Salv Topsoil from Stkpile Core Excavation Aggregate Backfill Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 Bit Matl for Mix Base Course Mixture Bit Matl for Mix Wear Course Mix Bit Matl for Tack Coat 12" RCP 15" RCP 18" RCP 21" RCP 24" RCP Install 12" FES Install 18" FES Const CB, Des G . Reconst CB -Adjust Frame & Ring Cast Random Riprap, C1 I Geotextile Filter 2" Bit Walk (Trailway) Aggregate Base Placed, C1 Conc C & G, Des B618 Roadside Seeding Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 Sodding ...Connect to Ex MH/CB Standard San. MH (0-8) 6" DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 Relocate Hydrant Adjust Hydrant Adjust Valve Box, Water Timber Retaining Wall ,Timber Tieback units Steel Screw Anchors Signal Modifications • SUBTOTAL - PARTICIPATING EST'D QUANTITY UNIT 100 LF 150 LF 5 EA 26,000 CY 1,000 CY 4,356 CY 4,356 CY 10,000 CY 10,000 CY 25,000 TN 430 TN 9,600 TN 200 TN 3,100 TN 5,500 GAL 400 LF 52 LF 120 LF 50 LF 80 LF 1 EA 1 EA 15 EA 30 LF ing 6 EA - 12 CY 40 SY 68,700 SF 5 900 CY 21,000 LF 10.8 AC 810 LB 3,600 SY 7 EA 1 EA 60 LF 4 EA 3 EA 10 EA 2,500 SF 57 EA 80 EA 1 LS - City Project UNIT PRICE $2.50 $6.00 $50.00 $2.00 $6.50 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 $5.00 $200.00 $10.00 $200.00 $11.00 $1.50 $20.00 $24.00 $28..00 $32.00 $36.00 $430.00 $550.00 $800.00 $125.00 $110.00 $50.00 $3.00 $0.30 $6.00 $5.00 $1,000.00 $1.75 $1.30 $370.00 $1,000.00 $65.00, $1,100.00 $330.00 $110.00 $10.00 $100.00 $50.00 $20,000.00 AMOUNT $250 $900 $250 $52,000 $6,500 $4,356 " $8,712 $30,000 $40,000 $125,000 $86,000 $96,000 $40,000 $34,100 $8,250 $8,000 $1,248. $3,360 $1,600 $2,880 $430 .$550 $12,000 $3,750 $660 $600 $120 "'$20,610 $5,400 $105,000 $10,800 $1,418 $4;680 $2,590 $1,000 $3,900 $4,400 $2,590 $1,100. $25,000 $5,700 _ $4,000 $20,000 $785,704 Page 1 26 -Dec -f APPENDIX A City Project •fON-PARTICIPATING (KINGS ROAD TO CLIFF ROAD) EST'D ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Remove Concrete Curbing 100 LF $2.50 $250 Salv Pipe Culvert 100 LF $6.00 $600 Salv CB Castings 4 EA $50.00 $200 Common Excavation 8,400 CY $2.00 $16,800 Topsoil Borrow, CV 500 CY $6.50 $3,250 Salv Topsoil to Stkpile 1,000 CY $1.00 $1,000 Salv Topsoil from Stkpile 1,000 CY $2.00 $2,000 Core Excavation 1,500 CY $3.00 $4,500 Aggregate Backfill 1,500 CY $4.00 $6,000 Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 4,300 TN $5.00 $21,500 Bit Matl for Mix 75 TN $200.00 $15,000 Base Course Mixture 1,600 TN $10.00 $16,000 Bit Matl for Mix 50 TN $200.00 $10,000 Wear Course Mix 780 TN $11.00 $8,580 Bit Matl for Tack Coat 730 GAL $1.50 $1,095 12" RCP 130 LF $20.00 $2,600 Const CB, Des G 5 EA $800.00 $4,000 Reconst CB 10 LF $125.00 $1,250 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 10 EA $110.00 $1,100 .Conc C & G, Des B618 5,200 LF $5.00 $26,000 Roadside Seeding 2.7 AC $1,000.00 $2,700 Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 203 LB $1.75 $354 900 SY $1.30 $1,170 •Sodding 6" DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 Relocate Hydrant 3 EA $1,100.00 $3,300 Adjust Hydrant 3 EA $330.00 $990 Adjust Valve Box, Water 6 EA $100.00 $600 1-1/2" Copper Service Grouping 3 EA $500.00 $1,500 Connect to Ex MH/CB 3 EA $370.00 $1,110 SUBTOTAL --NON-PARTICIPATING * * * * *. * * * * * *.* * * * * $157,349 PROJECT 460 - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY - MSA PART. (Cliff Rd to Beau D Rue Dr) $785,704 NON -MSA PART. (Kings Rd to Cliff Rd) $157,349 5% CONTINGENCIES $47,153 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS . . . . . . . . . $943,053 25% ESTIMATED OVERHEAD $235,763 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS . . . . . . $1,178,816 • Page 2 26 -Dec - 3 • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS PARCEL FRONT LESS ASSESSABLE PROPOSED PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE CREDIT FOOTAGE RATE ASSESSMENT --------7--------------------------------------------------------------- Section 19 10-01900-011-54 1,260 1,260 $78.45 $98,847 10-01900-011-55 155 155 $78.45 $12,160 Cedar Grove #1 Blk 2, Lt 12 592 592 $78.45 $46,442 Blk 8, Lt 4 130 75 55 $78.45 $4,315 Blk 8, Lt 3 166 166 $78.45 $13,008 Blk 8, Lt 2 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Blk 8, Lt 1 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Section 30 10-03000-011-25 200 200 $78.45 $15,690 10-03000-020-25 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 10-03000-030-25 100 100 $78.45 $7,845 10-03000-011-27 596 596 $78.45 $46,782 10-03000-010-29 270 270 $78:45 $21,182 10-03000-191-08 150 150 $78.45 $11,768 10-03000-192-08 712 712 $78.45 $55,856 10-03000-012-76 817 817 $78.45 $64,094 Peaceful Hg.ts Outlot A 285 75 210 $78.45 $16,474 Blk 1, -Lt 1 236 75 161 $33.75 $5,434 Cedar Ridge 1st Blk 1, Lt 1 225 225 $33.75 $7,594 Blk 1, Lt 3 207 75 132 $78.45 $10,330. Blk 2, Lt l 350 75 275. $78.45 $21,574 Cedar Grove No 4 _ Blk 6, Lt 12-16 388 388 $33.75 $13,095 Mari Acres • Blk 1, Lt 1 280 75 205 $78.45 $16,082 Mari Acres 2nd Blk 1, Lt 1 327 327 $78.45 $25,645 Blk 3, Lt .2 693 693 $78.45 $54,396 . Blk 3, Lt 3 270 75 195 $78.45 $15,298 Cedar Ridge Comm Park Add'n Blk 1, Lt 1 310' 75 235 $78.45 $18,436 Blk 2, Lt 1 341 75 266 $78.45 $20,868 Page 1 26 -Dec -85 APPENDIX B PARCEL FRONT LESS ASSESSABLE PROPOSED PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOOTAGE CREDIT FOOTAGE RATE ASSESSMENT ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Section 31 10-03100-020-06 264 264 $16.88 $4,455 10-03100-030-04 132 132 $16.88 $2,228 10-03100-050-04 132 132 $16.88 $2,228 10-03100-060-04 132 132 $16.88 $2,228 Flour Bin Intl 1st Blk 1, Lt 1 437 437 $78.45 $34,290 Cedarview Add'n Blk 1, Lt 1 168 168 $78.45 $13,.213 Blk 1, Lt 2 100 100 $78.45 $7,845 Blk 1, Lt 3 120 120 $78.45 $9,414 Durning's Subd'n Blk 1, Lt 1 172 172 $78.45 $13,454 Blk 1, Lt 2 213 213 $78.45 $16,710 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Totals 11,155 675 10,480 $746,927 • APPENDIX C PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS ESTIMATED SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing • Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing 1st Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes .• 37 January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 April 15, 1985 May 20, 1985 Fall, 1986, Spring, 1987 May, 1988 ASSESSMENT RATES a■■m■■se■osmaos **************** COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL MULTIFAMILY FULL RESIDENTIAL HALF RESIDENTIAL S CORNER LOT CREDIT EXISTING UTILITIES SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PROPOSED. UTILITIES WATER MAIN &.SERVICES STORM SEWER • . MANHOLE ® CATCH BASIN ® city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard PUBLIC STREET IMPROV ENTS plate #: _ WORKS PROJECT 46 3 DEPARTMENT I jAA, 3 Existing 42' RCP SY S. NA T'SSTA 10077 +:ircleExisting36' RCP'SL SITI N 5 4 .- .. STA 8014 + _ PIn Oak Drive Proposed Catch Basin; } I 010-06 15' RCP St: S. MN DOT Ex: 12' RCP St: S. ROW PLAT NO. 19-11 .,.. (--� Proposed CatcH Basins ® Ex.. 12: RCP St: S. - I 020-06 32' Roadway STA 0+00 2 ' JOHNSON FIR T ADDITION Q K`` ---- — s � ingsi Road 0 100 400 60 .200 city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC STREET IMPROV ENTS WORKS PROJECT 460(3V 1` 2 1) DEPARTMEN • 3 M RI SECON1 MARI A FIRST 1 1 STA 26t kC i ES 1 rmrTtnti .. MN DOT Ex. 2' RCP S. ROW PLAT NO, 19-10 -crFi f r Ra avtl 1 MN DOT DURNING'S ROW PLAT. NO.. 19-11 2 SUBDIVISION • 1 • CLEARVIEW 2• 1 ' ADDITION a; :S I ' CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL u• Cliff Drive it401 'j • PARK ADDITION 52' Roadway �• 2 �i • Ex. Trail , �1• 1. ii -County: -Ro-a& 3'1- - S T A-2 tf 6A — --- — FLOUR BIN INTERNATIONAL 1ST AD ITION 1 •7 2 :— 48' Roadway .030=04 60-04 Ex. 42' RCP St. S. • I " 060-04 MU 0 100 4001N 60 200 - f STA tOt77 t 32' Roadway city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: pima rd PUBLIC STREET IMPRO ENTS WORKS PROJECT 460 2 DEPARTMENT •I 3 240. RCP St: S. — 1 .i.. 2 • _Erlri Drive __,�I 3 Pond Q z$TA 34�fi N I� Cl).� II` MARI ACRES w U � .aST ADDITION Q 2 ¢ \\ CITY OF EA.GAN \\ 0.30-00 Ex. 72. CP St. S.— city of eagan PUBLIC $ �WORKS DEPARTME Erin. Drive I I . RAHN PARK 8' Trail 28#3 i 4, 5 ; . e' 7 CED R LIF SEC ND AD ITI N 1 %Proposed Retaining Wall 1 11 2 1 3. . 1 CEAR CLI F 2 1.. 2.. 3 +----Cliff HIII Lane 1 FIRST D ITION 6 --- 5 j.. .2.. 3 .. 1 C D R C IF 1" - 2- . 1.. 2 3 Proposed Catch Basins 2 T RD DDITIOIN 3....: .. 4...-.. 6.: - 8 .. ' 17-B egin 8' Tra I - � � - ;; VEDAR CLIFFOMMERCIAL o PARK AE DITION ' Ex: Trail Outlot A STA 28t6� I- Cllf_f_Drlve � I II� . 0 -100 4001 . . . 50 .200 ]NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard STREET IMPRO MENTS .PROJECT plae 46C ._ 3 CEDAR RIDGE j. I 1 I ' 2e " I I CEDAR 2.. 3 -i! .I I 0 30 .� I I .I "Ex. 19' F outage Road �! s 37 GROVE I Is II 4 32 Cedar Ridge Circle- _ _ --- q1524W20 � 3 33 NO. 4 ' - i --- Proposed •� i 2 34 Catch Basin 2 i 6 FIRST ADDITION;; II i ' STA 49#.%l I* i- Shale Ls�e 7 . •� " Ex. 42' RCP St. S.— I ,T 10 ,s ,a .. -----4�-� Ex: Trail ,I II •! I i � R-AHN PARK 3 •: 8' Trail MARI ACRES ;I v 52' Roadway 2ND ADDITION 0 Proposed Retaining Wall -' Ex. 4' RCP St. S. • I ' CE AR CL FFE ONtADITON 2Erin Drive I* 3 4 6 8 7 i S_.I A 38 142 0 100 400 200 • city of eagah NICHOLS ROAD PRO_ POSEDoapproved: standard plate #: PUBLIC STREETIMPROYEMENTS m WORKS PROJECT 460(y 4 ' DEPARTMENT . I i� Pond • II, `_ 011-27 • i Outlot A ■ STA 8 23I+ ■ ■ PEACEFUL.HEIGHTS ■ I ■ Glory Drive - Ex. 19' F ntage Road ,9 _ 8' Trail CEDAR GROVE N 0.2 Proposed Catch asins -52' Roadway M .18 '17 1 18" 15 Marble Lane 7.....18o 19' R mv Ex sti g Frontage Road 18 0 .20 t+F11 Be in Tr it CEDAR GROVE 15' 21 I .I iLO PEA E --- — ® 1a 22 NO. 4 . i i t ■ 13 23 I 12 24 i 17.: ..25 I I 10 28 010:-29 = I P I li 9- 27 ■ I i _ .'.8....28 CEDAR RIDGE ■ I I FIRST ADDITION v I i 7 29 ■ I li Q 1V • o too 400 -- ._.,--------._.. ...-- 50 .200 • city of eagan . NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: Standard PUBLIC STREET IMPRO ENTS plate #: WORKS PROJECT 460 � 5 DEPARTMEN MN DOT Il; ROW . 011-25 PLAT NO. 19-7 020-25: i 030-25 3' Ex. 276 RCP' St. S. 4" I. e' 7 S 9 44'Roadw y ' I MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF - TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-5 Proposed Catch Ba ins—i i I. :i Ex. 33'' R P' St.: S.—*�: • - 'i ' I . .I 011-65 : 30 - Difitey-Road -- MN DOT Il; ROW . 011-25 PLAT NO. 19-7 020-25: i 030-25 3' 3 2 31 3 0 29 29 CEDAR 27 GROVE 4" 6" e' 7 S 9 10 2 52' Roadway NO. 1 8' Trail : 12-' iC 7419 1- — -- r- - ---Ccuat-Y:.Aoad No.: 30 _ : '191-oe CEDAR GROVE NO. 2 • 8 • I ..' • ---- 011=27 : 0 100 400 • - - • 50 .200 city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC STREET IMPRO ENTS WORKS PROJECT 460(q 6 DEPARTMEN U • I For Detail See Page 12 I� STA 101:80 t Proposed Catch Basins Ii 44Roadway I� STA 964638 Proposed Catch Basins -4 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Ex:.3o' TRANSPORTATION RCP St. S: RIGHT OF WAY i PLAT NO. 19-5 / � oe i P, a0 �/ 'y .1 2 Ex..38' RCP St: S. • 3 • • 8 • 4' 6 Carnellan Lane CEDAR GROVE NO. 3 1 1 2 _Ex. P St: S. 1 6 1 CEDAR 2' 6 City of eagan. NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard PUBLIC STREET IMPRO MENTS plate #: WORKS PROJECT 460U 7 DEPARTMENT 1 3 4,. GROVE - STA 90#42 .Sapphire Lene Proposed Catch Basin y -- -, 8' •Trail i 1... 34 ... 2 NO. 1 Ex. 27': RCP St. S. II 2- 33. Q • i �I 3 3 2 0 100 400 ' V •I 4- 3 1 .i1 .__.. 60 200 City of eagan. NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard PUBLIC STREET IMPRO MENTS plate #: WORKS PROJECT 460U 7 DEPARTMENT 1 3 M RI SE ON MARI At FIRST i STA 26t C ES TUITION MN DOT ROW Ex. 7 RCP PLAT NO, 19-10 S • • VEDAR CLIFF C MMERCIAL, -- Cliff Drive PARK ADDITION 52' Roadway • 2 : _ Cliffeoanty--Road 32 1't64 —3— FLOUR BIN MN DOT FDURNINGS`INTERNA IONAL Ex: 12• - _RCP San. S. ® ROW 20 II 1ST ADDITION PLAT. NO.. 19-11 W ; SUBDIVISION ; 'I 2 Ex. 42' • �M RCP St. S. • � 48' Roadway • *o3o-oa CLEARVIEW : �- • *� 6" Water Sei vice 1 *050 -aa * 1 1/2" Water ervice ADDITION. '3; * .. : * oho -04 gDITI STA' 10t 32' Roadway - city of eagan NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS WORKS PROJECT 460 8 DEPARTMENT •I 1 CEDAR RIDGE II j rES ' 29 2...3 30 • 9' Fro tag 31 Proposed Catch Basin • I I 4 32 ' I A +2o Ceder Ridge Circle IS I 3 33 4 I 2 34 2 I . FIRST ADDITIO.4 I 1 (,e STA 7 •I iMI �� 17 16 15 Ex. 42` RCP St. S.7* ! Ex. Trail 3 MARI ACRES 2ND ADDITION Ex: 24/CP St: S. CEDAR load GROVE NO. 4 14 ® R-AHN PARK ■ 0 _ 52' Road f 6" Water Service — 8' Trail CE AR CL FF SEC ON A DIT ON , 2 - Erin Drive I' 3 .4 . 5 6 7 8. 9 13.T IAI `I 384 o ,oa 400 • city Of eagan. NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard 50 200 plate PUBLIC #: UTILITY IMPRO MENTS WORKS PROJECT 46 �1 9 DEPARTMENT IQ kD 0 0 1 L • Ex. 27'- RCP St: S. • • 44' Roadw y • N • • MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO. 19-5 1fl.Water Services: To Be Constructed Ex: 9' VCP Ex. 33'RCP MN DOT ROW PLAT NO. 19-7 N city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME 19 30 . DlfffeJRz o11 -ss: I �I 030-26 � • 52' Roadway- - . • 011-27 3 32 4' 31 6 30 0' 29 7 28 6 27 CEDAR GROVE 2 San. MH To Be Constructed • 8' -Trail 12 ' • NO. 1 r iYral ' --Cowvty. Road No.: 30 • • 191=oa CEDAR ' GROVE • : NO. 2 • • 8 • • • 0 .. 100 ---._. 400 IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 460 60 .200 approved: standard plate #: 10 .:; I' I For Detail See: Page 12..E ly STA 101 8011 1 Proposed Catch Basins T04 2 CEDAR r Ex: 36' RCP SC S. • 3 • i 8 GROVE • 4 6 i Carnellan Lane NO. 3 1 1' I 2 8' rail 1s Ex. ' RCP e%: s., CEDAR 2' 1 6 - M34 _ L GROVE STA 90464 ,i _ Sapphire Lane .- Proposed Catch Basin I. .. I 1... 34 I.. 2 NO. 1 Ex; 27'' RCP St: S I 2' 33. - Q• � 3 32 N • city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME i I • • I 4 3 1 NIC H O L S ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: UTILITY IMPRO MENTS 11 PROJECT 4609 - 44' Roadway I - STA 98+38 Proposed Catch Basins MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Ex. 30' TRANSPORTATION RCP St: S. I RIGHT OF WAY PLAT NO.. 19-5 2 CEDAR r Ex: 36' RCP SC S. • 3 • i 8 GROVE • 4 6 i Carnellan Lane NO. 3 1 1' I 2 8' rail 1s Ex. ' RCP e%: s., CEDAR 2' 1 6 - M34 _ L GROVE STA 90464 ,i _ Sapphire Lane .- Proposed Catch Basin I. .. I 1... 34 I.. 2 NO. 1 Ex; 27'' RCP St: S I 2' 33. - Q• � 3 32 N • city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME i I • • I 4 3 1 NIC H O L S ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: UTILITY IMPRO MENTS 11 PROJECT 4609 - MN DOT ROW PLAT NO. 19-4 Edge of Existing Pave Existing I I 20' Easement W I Doc. iF" 440334 I 5 1 I I I I I W I I I, sy 100-08 iO cc I wl m � W W I O U m U CYm x ki sx- w w w W I I ~rr ae o P0a � �eaJ r -:�- 010-12 r I I Existing Curb & Gutter W � s , Proposed Easement W I . s : 100' Radius 8' Trail IN I r 5 ti i 025" 100 10 ._ 50 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSEDIa—pprovel standard STREET IMPRO ENTS plate #: PROJECT 460 12 111111111 19 MN DOT. ROW PLAT NO. 19-5 44Road — city of eagan PUBLIC m WORKS DEPARTMENT Existing I I 20' Easement W I Doc. iF" 440334 I 5 1 I I I I I W I I I, sy 100-08 iO cc I wl m � W W I O U m U CYm x ki sx- w w w W I I ~rr ae o P0a � �eaJ r -:�- 010-12 r I I Existing Curb & Gutter W � s , Proposed Easement W I . s : 100' Radius 8' Trail IN I r 5 ti i 025" 100 10 ._ 50 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSEDIa—pprovel standard STREET IMPRO ENTS plate #: PROJECT 460 12 111111111 ADDENDUM 1 UIre, PROJECT 460 FEASIBILITY REPORT NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1/30/86 I. The assessment area on page 3 should include the following area: Section 19 Cedar Grove #1 Block 2, Lots 8 - 11 II. The original report overlooked the financing of the miscellaneous utility modifications. Staff proposes to access the benefitted properties for the water service installations as follows: 1. 1/2 of 1" water service costs because of improving existing water service for ® lots 8 - 11, block 2 of Cedar Grove #1. 2. All costs for 6" water stubs & 1�" water service 11 The cost for the manhole installation will be the responsibility of the sanitary sewer maintenance fund. III. Staff revised the attached preliminary assessment roll to include items I.& II. IV. The attached exhibit 6A should replace exhibit 6 of the original report. Ex. 27' RCPSt: IS.,ji 11 1 44' Roadw y : MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF .I TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY • PLAT NO. 19-5 .Proposed Catch Ba ins_4i 17 Ex. 33' R P St._ S:—:�! MN,DOT ROW PLAT NO. 19-7 AQ ■ city of eagan PU13LIC WORKS DEPARTMEN D I f f to y'-Read--- 3" " 32 31 30 29 2e_ CEDAR 4:: 6 6 7: .8'27 9 10 . 1.1 GROVE 2 52' Roadway NO. 1- 8' -8' Trail ;..: 12. •i • • • ,r -- —0auatx-Road N0._ 30 CEDAR GROVE / : I1 0 NO. 2 030-25 • 8 • I ., O 60100 011-2J 00 .200 ..__... • 4 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: STREET IMPR�MENTS PROJECT 46 6a; • :191 -os 011-2s : j •; I 020-25I CEDAR GROVE / : I1 0 NO. 2 030-25 • 8 • I ., O 60100 011-2J 00 .200 ..__... • 4 NICHOLS ROAD PROPOSED approved: standard plate #: STREET IMPR�MENTS PROJECT 46 6a; .• PARCEL DESCRIPTION --------------- Section 19 10-01900-011-54 10-01900-011-55 Cedar Grove 11 Blk 2, Lt 8 Blk 2, Lt 9 Blk 2, Lt 10 Blk 2, Lt 11 Blk 2, Lt 12 Blk 8, lit 4 Blk 8, Lt 3 Blk 8, Lt 2 Elk 8, Lt 1 APPENDIX B-1 REVISED PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PROJECT 460 NICOLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS FRONT LESS ASSESSABLE PROPOSED PROPOSED WATER TOTAL FOOTAGE .------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CREDIT FOOTAGE RATE ASSESSMENT SERVICE ASSESSMENT 1,260 1,260 $78.45 $98,847 10-03000-012-76 $98,847 155 155 $78.45 $12,160 lk 1, Lt 1 $12,160 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 . .,.. 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 75 75 $16.88 $1,266 $853 $2,119 592 592 $78.45 $46,442 Elk 1, Lt 1 $46,442 ... 130 75 55 $78.45 $4,315 10-03100-020-06 $4,315 166 166 $78.45 $13,008 ..-- 10-03100-060-04 -- $13,008 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Cedarview Add'n $5,884 .. ... .. 75 75 $78.45 $5,884 Elk 1, Lt 3 $5,884 Section 30 200 10-03000-011-25 200 10-03000-020-25 75 10-03000-030-25 100 10-03000-011-27 596 10-03000-010-29 270 10-03000-191-08 150 10-03000-192-08 712 10-03000-012-76 817 Peaceful Rgts 596 270 Outlot A 285 lk 1, Lt 1 236 Sar Ridge 1st Blk 1, Lt 1 225 Blk 1, Lt 3 207 Blk 2, Lt 1 350 Cedar Grove No 4 $11,768 Elk 6, Lt 12-16 388 Mari Acres 712 Blk 1, Lt 1 260 Mari Acres 2nd $55,856 Blk 1, Lt 1 327 Elk 3, Lt 2 693 Blk 3, Lt 3 270 Cedar Ridge Comm - Park Add'n $16,474 Elk 1, Lt 1 310 Blk 2, Lt 1 - 341 Section 31 - 10-03100-020-06 264 10-03100-030-04 132 10-03100-050-04 .132 ..-- 10-03100-060-04 -- _.--_ 132 Flour Bin Int'1 1st 132 Blk 1, Lt 1 437 Cedarview Add'n $10,330 Blk 1, Lt 1 168 Blk 1, Lt 2 _ 100 Elk 1, Lt 3 120 Durning's Subd'n 388 Blk 1, Lt 1 172 Blk 1, Lt 2 ------------------------------- 213 Totals 11,455 • $16,082 200 $78.45 $15,690 $15,690 75 $78.45 $5,884 $5,884 100 $78.45 $7,845 $7,845 596 270 $78.45 $46,782 $5,119 $51,901 $78.45 $21,182 $21,182 150 $78.45 $11,768 $11,768 712 $78.45 $55,856 $55,856 817 $78.45 $64,094 $64,094 75 210 $78.45 $16,474 $16,474 75 161 $33.75 $5,434 $5,434 225 $33.75 $7,594 $7,594 75 132 $78.45 $10,330 $10,330 75 275 $78.45 $21,574 $21,574 388 $33.75 $13,095 $13,095 75 205 $78.45 $16,082 $16,082 327 $78.45 $25,645 $25,645 693 $78.45 $54,396 $54,396 75 195 $78.45 $15,298 $15,298 75 235 $78.45 $18,436 $18,436 75 266 $78.45 $20,868 $20,868 264 $16.88 $4,456 $4,456 132 $16.88 $2,228 $2,559 $4,788 132 $16.88 $2,228 $2,559 $4,788 132 - $16.88 $2,228 $1,313 $3,541 - 437 $78.45 $34,290 $34,290 168 $78.45 $13,213 $13,213 100 $78.45 $7,845 $7,845 120 $78.45 $9,414 $9,414 172 $78.45 $13,454 $13,454 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 213 $78.45 $16,710 $16,710 675 10,780 $751,995 $14,963 $766,957 53 07 -Feb -88 CITY PROJECT 460 ® NIC OLS ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS COST ESTIMATE EST'D ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT Remove Concrete Curbing 100 LF $2.50 $250 Salv Pipe Culvert 150 LF $6.00 $900 Salv CB Castings 5 EA $50.00 $250 Common Excavation 26,000 CY $2.00 $52,000 Topsoil Borrow, CV 1,000 CY $6.50 $6,500 Salv Topsoil to Stkpile 4,356 CY $1:00 $4,356 Salv Topsoil from Stkpile 4,356 CY $2.00 $8,712 Core Excavation 10,000 CY $3.00 $30,000 Aggregate Backfill 10,000 CY $4.00 $40,000 Aggregat,e Base, Cl. 5 25,000 TN $5.00 $125,000 Bit Matl for Mix 430 TN $200.00 $86,000 Base Course Mixture 9,600 TN $10.00 $96,000 Bit Matl for Mix 200 TN $200.00 $40,000 Wear Course Mix 3,100 TN $11.00 $34,100 Bit Matl for Tack Coat 5,500 GAL $1.50 $8,250 12" RCP 400 LF $20.00 $8,000 15" RCP 52 LF $24.00 $1,248 18" RCP - 120 LF $28.00 $3,360 21" RCP 50 LF $32.00 $1,600 24" RCP 80 LF $36.00 $2,880 Onstall 12" FES 1 EA $430.00 $430 Install 1811 FES 1 EA $550.00 $550 Const CB, Des G 15 EA $800.00 $12,000 Reconst CB 30 LF $125.00 $3,750 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 6 EA $110.00 $660 Random Riprap, Cl I 12 CY $50.00 $600 Geotextile Filter 40 SY $3.00 $120 2" Bit Walk (Trailway) 68,700 SF $0.30 $20,610 Aggregate Base Placed, Cl 5 900 CY $6.00 $5,400 Conn C & G, Des B618 21,000 LF $5.00 $105,000 Roadside Seeding 10.8 AC $1,000.00 $10,800 Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 810 LB $1.75 $1,41.8 Sodding 3,600 SY $1.30 $4,680 Connect to Ex MH/CB 7 EA $370.00 $2,590 Standard San. MH (0-8) 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 6" DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 1" Water Service Groupings 4 EA $650.00 $2,600, Relocate Hydrant 4 EA $1,100.00 $4,400 Adjust Hydrant 3 EA $330.00 $2,590 Adjust Valve Box, Water 10 EA $110.00 $1,100 Timber Retaining Wall 2,500 SF $10.00 $25,000 Timber Tieback units 57 EA $100.00 $5,700 Steel Screw Anchors 80 EA $50.00 $4,000 Signal Modifications 1 LS $20,000.00 $20,000 �BTOTAL - PARTICIPATING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -$788,304 Pagel 02 -Feb -86 -PARTICIPATING (KINGS ROAD TO CLIFF ROAD) O EST''D TEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT. Remove Concrete Curbing 100 LF $2.50 $250 Salv Pipe Culvert 100 LF $6.00 $600 Salv CB Castings 4 EA $50..00 $200 Common Excavation 8,400 CY $2.00 $16,800 Topsoil Borrow, CV 500 CY $6.50 $3,250 Salv Topsoil to Stkpile 1,000 CY $1.00 $1,000 Salv Topsoil from Stkpile 1,000 CY $2.00 $2,000 Core Excavation 1,500 CY $3.00 $4,500 Aggregate Backfill 1,500 CY $4.00 $6,000 Aggregate Base, Cl. 5 4,300 TN $5.00 $21,500 Bit Matl for Mix 75 TN $200.00 $15,000 Base Course Mixture 1,600 TN $10.00 $16,000 Bit Matl for Mix 50 TN $200.00 $10,000 Wear Course Mix 780 TN $11.00 $8,580 Bit Matl for Tack Coat 730 GAL $1.50 $1,095 12" RCP 130 LF $20.00 $2,600 Const CB, Des G 5 EA $800.00 $4,000 Reconst CB 10 LF $125.00 $1,250 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 10 EA $110.00 $1,100 Conc C & G, Des B618 5,200 LF $5.00 $26,000 Roadside Seeding 2.7 AC $1,000.00 $2,700 Seed Mixture, Cl. 5 203 LB $1.75 $354 Sodding 900 SY $1.30 $1,170 to Ex MH/CB 3 EA $370.00 $1,110 Wonnect " DIP Watermain, Cl. 52 60 LF $65.00 $3,900 1-1/2" Copper Service Grouping 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 Relocate Hydrant 3 EA $1,100.00 $3,300 Adjust Hydrant 3 EA $330.00 $990 Adjust Valve Box, Water 6 EA $100.00 $600 SUBTOTAL - NON -PARTICIPATING * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * $156,849 PROJECT 460 - PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY MSA PART. (Cliff Rd to Beau D Rue Dr) $788,304 NON -MSA PART. (Kings Rd to Cliff Rd) $156,849 5% CONTINGENCIES $47,258 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS . . . . . . . . . $945,153 25% ESTIMATED OVERHEAD $236,288 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS . . . . . . $1,181,441 • Page2 'J�J 02 -Feb -86 • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Thirteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 463/CLIFF ROAD (STREETS) B,. Public Hearing for Project 463, Cliff Road (Streets - T.H. 3 to Inver Grove Heights) --The Dakota County Highway Department's capital improvement program proposes to reconstruct and surface Cliff Road (County Road 32) from Trunk Highway 3 to CSAH 71 in Inver Grove Heights. Due to the fact that the City of Eagan will be expected to participate in the cost of this project, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on January 7 in consideration of holding a public hearing on February 4. Enclosed on pages �through N is a copy of that feasibility report for the Counci 's informat on and review during the presenta- tion of this public hearing which will be coordinated by our consulting engineer who prepared the report. All formal notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all poten- tially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM_ To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 463 (Cliff Road - Streets) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of a cost participation • agreement with Dakota County. 6�9 1 REP -ORT ON DAKOTA C.S.A.H. No. 32 (CLIFF ROAD) STREET IMPROVEMENTS ® PROJECT No. 463 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1985 n FILE No. 49374 /eJ /�o.ce�icoa, Radeue, 14a e-i1da & f4d"442ied, YOW. SL Oa"4 A&WWO& 67t J ... C,u.N..lf.'ie0 Ln4:Nev Y1-61 2335 !V. 7w.4 dg4k rey 36 P -d, M- .. 55113 /1/,0..: 61.2-636-4600 December 9, 1985 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Dakota CSAH 32, Cliff Road Project No. 463 Our File No. 49374 Dear Mayor and Council: uurr c, nurrnnoo. Pr Rnbrn IV'. Ru,ome. P.F. Jrnrph C..4 i- 4. P.li. llrml/urr!A. Erre N.", P./i. Ro-ha•d l-1Irrruv, P. E, Junle, C. Oban, P.r, Glenn R, Cook, RE_ A'rirb A. Gorduo. I'. L'. ]humor E, f.irvrr, P.L. Ru h,,,d K hula, P F Roberr G, .Srhnnidil. P, F M.... 1.. .Sn,,W,. P.F. Donald C Rurror;/L Il F. lerrr A. Rourdmr, AE. AM,k A, I/unsnn. 11 f., 1M A. I irld. 141:, Alirherl T'. Rnnrncmn, BE. Rubra R. PJi//rr lr•. /t:i. Oo ld O. IoAR -.. 14 E. Cherlo A Erin snn N.OA, lln4on df. Okun Transmitted herewith is our report for Dakota CSAH 32, Cliff Road, Street Improvements, Project No. 463. The proposed improvement of CSAH 32 is discussed and presented in this report. A preliminary assessment roll is also • included. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, ONS ROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Thomas E. Angus TEA:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the 1 s/of�thhe Sta of Minnesota. -2i - / CSC ri�VMMaark A. ganson, P.E. Date: December 9, 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: Department of lic Works ® Date:�L1, b r E -2345d �l/ ® SCOPE: This project provides for the City's portion of the upgrading of Dakota County State Aid Highway 32 (Cliff Road) within the City Limits. The entire Dakota County Project is from T.H. 3 to CSAH 71 in Inver Grove Heights and includes reconstruction of 800' of CSAH 71. Construction is proposed to be completed in two phases with grading and gravel base completion in 1986 and bituminous surfacing in 1987. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible and is in accordance with the Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project will be carried out as one contract and be administered by Dakota County. The City of Eagan will be required to enter into a 45/55 cost sharing agreement with Dakota County for.that portion of road within the City Limits. DISCUSSION: CSAH 32 from T.H. 3 to the Inver Grove Heights west boundary is C� traffic. Under this project, it is proposed to regrade the road to create safer traffic conditions and to improve storm water drainage through culverts and ditches. The selected typical roadway section is based on a 20 year de- sign structural strength of 9 ton. Because of the proposed regrading of this road on the westerly end of the project, the house on parcel 010-78 (D. Holz residence) will either be reloca- ted on the property or removed and the driveway entrance will be eliminated. If the house is relocated on the property, access will be provided through an entrance from the parcel to the east. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SLOPE EASEMENT ACQUISITION: A minimum 100' right-of-way will be acquired for CSAH 32. Within the City of Eagan, an additional 17' of right-of-way is required from Parcel 010-78 (D. Holz) to meet .this criteria. Page 1. 2345d 5Y approximately 15' wide and gravel surfaced. The approach to T.H. 3 and the at • grade railroad crossing are both very steep and pose hazards for westbound C� traffic. Under this project, it is proposed to regrade the road to create safer traffic conditions and to improve storm water drainage through culverts and ditches. The selected typical roadway section is based on a 20 year de- sign structural strength of 9 ton. Because of the proposed regrading of this road on the westerly end of the project, the house on parcel 010-78 (D. Holz residence) will either be reloca- ted on the property or removed and the driveway entrance will be eliminated. If the house is relocated on the property, access will be provided through an entrance from the parcel to the east. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND SLOPE EASEMENT ACQUISITION: A minimum 100' right-of-way will be acquired for CSAH 32. Within the City of Eagan, an additional 17' of right-of-way is required from Parcel 010-78 (D. Holz) to meet .this criteria. Page 1. 2345d 5Y • r] C Due to the proposed extensive grading within Eagan on the west end of the project, slope easements will be required from all parcels within the City. The estimated amount of right-of-way acquisition and slope easements within the City of Eagan only are summarized below: Slope Right -of -Way Easement Acquisition (Acres) (Acres) SE 1/4, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 0.16 -- 010-78 (D. Holz) 0.28 0.08 NE 1/4, Section 36 010-02 (Dunn) 0.56 -- Total 1.0 0.08 The total County Road Improvements estimated quantity and cost of right-of-way and slope easement acquisition is summarized below. Acres Rate/Acre Right-of-way Acquisition 8.4 $10,000 Slope Easements 5.9 $ 2,000 Parcel 010-78 (Holtz) Relocation/Removal -- -- Total Estimated Cost 2345d Page 2. �n Estimated Cost $ 84,000 11,800 40,000 $135,800 ® AREAS TO BE INCLUDED: The areas to be included for both assessment and con- struction purposes include all parcels abutting or obtaining primary access to CSAH 32 between T.H. 3 and the east boundary of the City of Eagan. Construction Area SEZ, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 010-78 (D. Holz) NES, Section 36 010-02 (Dunn) Assessment Area SEZ, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 010-78 (D. Holz) NES, SEction 36 010-02 (Dunn) 010-01 (F. Holz) • COST ESTIMATE: The total estimated project costs are summarized below. Con- struction costs are based on estimated quantities provided by the County. • Right-of-way/Slope Easements Phase I Grading and Culverts Phase II Bituminous Surfacing Total Estimated Construction Cost + 5% Contingencies + 25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest Total Estimated Project Costs Page 3 2345d N / $ 135,800 $ 662,015 278,285 $1,076,100 53,805 $1,129,905 282,475 $1,412,380 ® ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties as shown on the attached drawing. A preliminary assessment roll is included in this report as Appendix A. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the benefited properties an amount equal to a comparable residential street. The City's 1986 rate for a standard 32' resi- dential street with concrete curb and gutter is $33.75. However, in this case where a rural road is being built, a reduced rate has been computed based on a comparable 24' residential street without curb and gutter. This rate equates to 70 percent of the standard residential rate or $23.63 per front foot. • sessment rate would be one-half of the total or $11.81 per front foot. For parcels that do not abut the street but have their primary access from the street through an easement, a standard front footage of 85' will be used to calculate the assessment. REVENUE SOURCES: As previously indicated, the,City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a 45/55 cost sharing agreement for that portion of the project within the City of Eagan. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the portion in the City of Eagan is 5.54% of the total project length. This rep- resents a total project cost in the City of Eagan of $78,246 (5.54% of $1,412,380). Therefore, cost sharing between the City of Eagan and Dakota County is estimated to be: Page 4. 2345d Z This rate is proposed to be assessed against all abutting property that is ® benefited by this project. For those_ properties used as residential, the as- • sessment rate would be one-half of the total or $11.81 per front foot. For parcels that do not abut the street but have their primary access from the street through an easement, a standard front footage of 85' will be used to calculate the assessment. REVENUE SOURCES: As previously indicated, the,City of Eagan and Dakota County will enter into a 45/55 cost sharing agreement for that portion of the project within the City of Eagan. It is assumed for purposes of this report that the portion in the City of Eagan is 5.54% of the total project length. This rep- resents a total project cost in the City of Eagan of $78,246 (5.54% of $1,412,380). Therefore, cost sharing between the City of Eagan and Dakota County is estimated to be: Page 4. 2345d Z • • Right-of-way/Slope Easements Phase I Grading & Culverts Phase II Bituminous Surfacing Total Estimated Construction Cost +5% Contingencies County (55%) City (45%) Total $ 132,415 $ 3,385 $ 135,800 645,511 16,504 662,015 271,348 6,937 278,285 $1,049.,274 $26,826 $1,076,100 52,464 1,341 53,805 $1,101,738 $28,167 $1,129,905 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admr. & Bond Interest 275,433 7,042 282,4.75 TOTAL ............................. $1,377,171 $35,209 $1,412,380 Revenue sourcesto cover the cost of this project for the City of Eagan is as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Eagan's Portion $35,209. Eagan's Assessment $27,084 $35,209 $27,084 -$ 8,125 The estimated project deficit is $8,125 which will be the responsibility of the major street fund. 2345d Page 5. 0 • r1 U PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Complete First Phase Construction Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 2345d Page 6. January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 Spring, 1986 Spring, 1986 Fall, 1986 Fall, 1987 Fall, 1987 May, 1988 ® APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL CSAH 32 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 463 Assessable=_ Total Parcel Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment SEZ, Section 25 010-77 (Urban) 325 $23.63 $ 7,679.75 010-78 (D. Holz) 208.7 23.63 * 4,931.58 NEZ, Section 36 010-02 (Dunn) 570 23.63 13,469.10 010-01 (F. Holz) 85 11.81 1,003.85 TOTAL 1188.7 $27,084.28 *Assumes house is removed Page 7. 2345d NORTH 2200 4400 SCALE IN FEET ® C.S.A.H. 32 (CLIFF ROAD) STREETIMPROVEMENT CITY PROJECT NO.463 EAGAN, MINNESOTA END PROJECT BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. PAuI. Minn. Date: DEC., 19851( FIG. No.1 Comm. 49 37 4 JI 3 T c CLIFF RD. 0 (0'/ 1 1 1 EAGAN 010-77 CO. RD. 32 9 Q'. Q• CC Q� co NORTH oIo — 7e i 0 200 400 SCALE IN FEET C.S.A.H. 32 (CLIFF ROAD) STREET ASSESSEMENT CITY PROJECT NO.463 EAGAN, MINNESOTA INVER GROVE HEIGHTS I 10TH ST. W. ®®® FRONT FOOT ASSESSMENT BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. /% [Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. 2 Comm.4937 4 Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Fourteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 461/YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (STREETS) C. Public Hearing for Project 461, Yankee Doodle Road (Streets - 35E to Lexington Avenue) --As a part of Dakota County's capital improvement program, Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) is proposed to be upgraded in 1986 to I -35E to Lexington Avenue. As a part of all county road improvements, the City will be required to participate in the construction costs. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was prepared by the consulting engineering firm Stgar, Roscoe, Fausch Inc., who are the consulting engineers retained by the County for the detailed design of this road improvement. This feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on January 7 with the public hearing being scheduled for February 4. Enclosed on pages � through is a copy of the feasibility report for t e Council's eview and information during this public hearing. All formal notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing on February 4. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the installation of Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road Streets) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of a cost participation agreement with Dakota County. .91 CJ FEASIBILITY STUDY AND REPORT FOR CITY PROJECT NO. 461 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD IMPROVEMENT (DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD 28) INTERSTATE 35E TO LEXINGTON AVENUE JANUARY, 1986 NESTRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LANDSURVEYORS 630 Twelve Oaks Center, 15500 Wayzata Boulevard Wayzata Minnesota 55391 (612) 475-0010 AP ED BY: City of Eag Depa trrye� Date f Public Works ���� Council ate I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. - n 1L7L' , - - • IS�S� Commission No. 0850679 &7 0 r� STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS TRANSPORTATION ■ CIVIL nSTRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS January 7, 1986 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mayor and Members o'f the Council: RE: YANKEE DOODLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS I -35E TO LEXINGTON AVENUE FEASIBILITY STUDY CITY PROJECT NO. 461 Commission No. 0850679 Enclosed please find the Feasibility Study for street and utility improvements to Yankee Doodle Road' (Dakota County Road 2'8) from I -35E to Lexington Avenue. The project as proposed is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plans and is feasible from an engineering standpoint. We would be pleased to meet with the City Council and staff and with other interested parties to review any aspect of this study. Respectfully submitted, ST`RRGARR---IROSCOE{r,-FIAUSC�H, INC.' Timothy D. Phenow, P.E. Associate Robert B. Roscoe, P.E. Senior Vice President • JRD/TDP/jal Enclosure 630 Twelve Oaks Center, 15500 Wayzata Blvd., Wayzata MN 55391 (612) 475-0010 ® INDEX YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD 28) STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 461 Page Letter of Transmittal Index I. Introduction I II. Summary and Recommendations 3 III. Project Description 4 IV. Right of Way, Construction Easements, Permits 13 V. Estimated Costs 15 VI. Benefited Properties 16 VII. Assessments 17 VIII. City/County Cost Participation 22 IX. Project Schedule 23 Appendix - Detailed Construction Cost Estimate 24 • I. INTRODUCTION 11 Yankee Doodle Road (Dakota County Road 28) from Interstate 35E to Lexington Avenue (Dakota County Road 43) is presently a two lane rural roadway section in a developing area (see Figure 1). This study includes the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road to an urban roadway section with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities. Improvements to the Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue intersection are also proposed. In addition, the extension of sanitary sewer and watermain is considered to serve the parcels on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road. II. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION The project as outlined in this study is feasible from an engineering standpoint. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,675,770.00. The following comments and recommendations are presented for the Council's consideration. 1. It is recommended the City Council accept this Feasibility Study and schedule a public hearing for the proposed improvement to Yankee Doodle Road between I -35E and Lexington Avenue (County Road 43). 2. The project is anticipated to be administered by Dakota County. If the project proceeds, it is recommended the City of Eagan enter into a cooperative agreement with Dakota County on a 55/45 cost sharing program. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION STREET IMPROVEMENTS Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) is identified in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Transportation Plan as a minor arterial route running in an east -west direction through the north half of the City. Since County Road 28 will be under the jurisdiction of Dakota County, any improvements must be reviewed and approved by Dakota County. The roadway currently exists as a two lane rural roadway section. The land adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) is comprehended as community shopping center, limited business and mixed residential use in the City of Eagan's Land Use Guide Plan. Development is currently proceeding on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. Based on this necessary development and the future projected development of the area, it is necessary to upgrade Yankee Doodle Road. A traffic analysis memorandum prepared for Dakota County by Strgar-Roscoe-Fausch, Inc. in October of 1985 recommended a four lane divided roadway. with left turn lanes at the intersections (see Figures 2 and 3). In addition a right turn lane is proposed from eastbound Yankee Doodle Road to southbound Denmark Avenue, and left turn lanes on Lexington Avenue to east and westbound Yankee Doodle Road. The roadway is proposed to be an 86 foot wide, 9 ton design bituminous pavement with concrete curb and gutter. Figure 4 illustrates the proposed roadway section. Two through lanes with an 8 foot shoulder and 18 foot median are provided. The 18 foot median will be reduced to 6 feet to provide left turn lanes where necessary. The estimated cost for the proposed street improvements is $1,337,020.00. - 76- e T,--= w -. T -- STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF E A G A N FIGURE NO. 2 CONSULTING ENGINEERS R LAND SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) PROPOSED STREET & 530 TWELVE OARS CENTER. 6500 WAYZATA BLVD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MINNETDNRI, OTI 5539 CITY PROJECT N O. 4 6 1 '6121475 �MIDom° COMMISSION NO. 0 8 5 0 8 7 9 _ — U �OLC!p - ' rte_ I T,--= w -. T -- STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF E A G A N FIGURE NO. 2 CONSULTING ENGINEERS R LAND SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) PROPOSED STREET & 530 TWELVE OARS CENTER. 6500 WAYZATA BLVD UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MINNETDNRI, OTI 5539 CITY PROJECT N O. 4 6 1 '6121475 �MIDom° COMMISSION NO. 0 8 5 0 8 7 9 �7 --------- ---- ------ --- - ----------- - ------ Z rcnING LGT ea�ee � If. ,L`,,I _ --- ------- --- --------- -- ----- -- 41- z--- --- 41 ------- -------- ----------- - .�T o o LQT D ZIS STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF E A G A N FIGURE NO. 3 CONSULTING ENGINEERS . L.SND SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) PROPOSED STREET & 630 TWELVE OAKS CENTER. ISWWAYZATABLVD, UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS MINNETONKA. MINNESOTA 55391 (61 2) 47S_Nlo CITY PROJECT NO. 461 COMMISSION N0.0850879 TYPICAL SECTION EXISTING YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (COUNTY RD. 28 ) YANKEE DOODLE RD (CO. RD. 28) R/W sn' I ten' -GF' L. AGGREGATE BITUMINOUS TYPICAL SECTION YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (COUNTY RD. 28) rL YANKEE DOODLE RD (SURVEY LINE) (CO. RD. 28 ) R/W (EW.B. LANE E.B. LANE RAW 60' 60' - 65' I I 8' 8' 1 8' 12' 14' 9' 9' 14' 12' 8' 1 8' 8' 11 TRAIL I TRAIL I DETAIL A JT B618 CB,G TYPICAL ® STRGA&ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC CONSUL i1NG FNGINEfIRS 0 IANO SURVEYORS 630 TWELVE OAKS CENTER* ISSMWAYZATABLVD. MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA SS391 16191 675.0610 DETAIL A TACK COAT (2357) 1 1/4" BIT. WEARING (2361) 2" BIT. BINDER (2341) 2" BIT. BASE (2331) 12"AGG. BASE, CL.5 (2211) CITY OF EAGAN YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD.28) CITY PROJECT, NO. 461 DETAIL DETAIL A B 8618 C 8 G DETAIL B 2" BIT. WALK 6"AGG. BASE, CL.5 (2211) FIGURE NO. 4 TYPICAL SECTIONS COMMISSION NO. 0850679 0 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS r With the installation of curb and gutter and the filling of the rural roadway section ditches, lateral storm sewer is required. Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) between I -35E and Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) lies entirely within Storm Sewer Subdivision D as outlined in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The roadway abuts minor Subdivisions D-31, D- 19, D-18, D-30, D-29, D-20 and D-23 (see Figure 5). The trunk storm sewer for this area was installed in 1985 under the Town Centre development (Contract 85-7, Project 429). The forcemain between Ponds DP -5 and DP -4 is scheduled to be constructed in the Spring of 1986 under Project 443. This construction should complete the trunk storm sewer improvements for this area. It is proposed under this project to connect lateral facilities to the existing trunk facilities. At Denmark Avenue it is proposed to extend a lateral storm sewer from the existing 48" trunk main east to accommodate the runoff from the west of Town Centre Drive "100" (see Figure 2). East of Town Centre Drive 11100" storm sewer is proposed to be extended from the existing 18" line at the high rise entrance west to accept runoff between Town Centre Drive 11100" and the high rise entrance (see Figures 2 and 3). Lateral crossings are also proposed at Town Centre Drive 11100E" as well as the Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue intersection which would connect to existing facilities (see Figure 3). The estimated cost of the storm sewer improvements proposed under this project is $130,590.00. -,l- F I �- ""T, NNS �•rl H 8 ' 3 ' F-3 H-10 I / -q \ 1 N:1 \ / I F Nl IT fit -cd H 5 V M .I I F r q D-10 / `� F-5 _ � D_1�� D IS L'E I,. ( u 1 1 D-2 D-6 1 r,.,«� T nKE 2 1y�T., i I J •� -��� y --� E-6 �V- - I.., .'h JE -3 �. ISI rma: 1E.uG D-14 �� E-8.. K u; D-I2� L �.....: �aNt: E-5 i1 ,r....; C_I5 ; �- E-4 IF_7- \ C-18 11 D-16 ) 1 '� D-13 11� Iv r. \D-22 : Ili E, -II E I' \1 All D21D 24 \ E AN I ,T,f =1,iRl J -I9 C-17 \ I / ID -26 < E-13 YAN EE I D 31 D-18 DO DLE 1 �J\ �p,E 14 `- I ��1•. '� (}.O,—/a-10 D� 28)''x% ��E 17 Y _ I I t _—� C l 3' ICI2 1 % / D 19 I 4,4-30\-. I D23.,21 .�F"' 40 I C -II .10"' /D 28. �! I 1 E -IB A. D-26; j. / TISJ J4 I .. 2 i J-70 3 G /J-3 'IT i CJ 12c+aTn I J-5 II J-73` ��Y J ,�^�� C-22 J-2 /�� ji..;� J-20�� J 24 L J -If 'Sl J..S4 J-10 J-14 /J-16 I i P l / J-23` \ _ AJ -21, /�• J -I IJ -62 i( „�d--y -� J-63 7 J-32 I._ •� 1 \J-64 I J-53_ I J-54 1l� -V--I� /C J-33 Sll /' \B-3 /\y -58,c El's �STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE NO. 5 CONSUI TING ENGINEERS R )ANO SURVEYORS YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN STORM 630 TWELVE OAKS CENTER. ISSOO WAYZATA BLVD. (CO. RD. 28) DRAINAGE PLAN MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA SS391 (612)475.0010 CITY PROJECT NO. 461 1 COMMISSION NO. 0850679 0 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS I C Trunk sanitary sewer exists on the east half of the proposed project on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. This project proposes an extension of an 8" sanitary sewer to the north to serve future development. This line is proposed to be located just west of the Lexington Avenue intersection (see Figure 6). The Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan has been revised for this area. The sanitary sewer extension as proposed herein would accommodate a portion north of Yankee Doodle Road of Subdistrict H2 of District C and redirect that area to District N, Subdistrict V. The estimated cost for sanitary sewer improvements is $11,660.00. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Eighteen to twenty inch diameter trunk watermain exists along the entire Yankee Doodle Road corridor as comprehended in the Water Supply and Distribution Plan for the City of Eagan. This study proposes a 12" trunk watermain crossing at Town Centre Drive 11100". A 6" diameter watermain crossing is also proposed at the commercial drive entrance and Town Centre Drive "100E". These extensions are proposed to serve future development to the north (see Figure 6). The estimated cost associated with watermain improvements is $37,630.00. 4 013- 513 010-77 DAKOTA ELECTRIC 020-56 YANKEE DOODLE RD. (CO. RD. 28) mmmm 0— TLOTA UT OUTLOT A I DRIVE lo OUTLOT D OUTLOT G 0A L j Lj OUTLOT E > < OUTLOT F E OUTLOT B CENTRE \V C) OUTLOT D oLEGEND OUTLOT C EXIST. SAN. SEWER ii—>— PROPOSED SAN. SEWER EXIST. WATERMAIN PROPOSED WATERMAIN STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE NO. 6 CONSULTING ENGINEERS III I AND SURVIEVORS PROPOSED SAN. SEWER YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) AND WATERMAIN 630 TWELVE OARS CENTER. 15W WAYZATA BLVD MINNEIONK A MINNESOTA 55191 1 (612) .,S.wlo I CITY PROJECT NO. 461 COMMISSION NO. 0850679 0 TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Eight foot wide bituminous trails are proposed on each side of Yankee Doodle Road. The trails are proposed to be constructed 1 foot inside the right of way. An alternate bid item for concrete trail on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road will be included in the construction documents. The estimated cost of trail improvements is $58,870.00. TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS Dakota County is proposing traffic signals be installed at the Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue intersection. It is proposed the costs be included herein and incorporated into the ® total project cost for the City of Eagan. is As part of this project, it is proposed to install signal conduit under the roadway for future signal systems at Denmark Avenue and the commercial entrance. The estimated cost of signal improvements is $100,000.00. �3 12 - • r 9 IV. RIGHT OF WAY,CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS AND PERMITS To improve Yankee Doodle Road to a divided roadway with turn lanes and trails, additional right of way is required. Currently, 50' of right of way is available on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road. An additional 10' is required to construct the proposed improvement. 60' to 65' of right of way exists on the south side, therefore, no additional right of way is required. Thirty-three feet of right of way exists on the east side of Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) north of Yankee Doodle Road. It is proposed to acquire an additional 17' of right of way north of the intersection. Table 1 provides a detailed summary of the required right of way and construction easements for each parcel. Prior to the start of construction, a permit will be required from Mn/DOT to construct portions of this project within Mn/DOT right of way. q�4 - 13 - ® TABLE 1 RIGHT OF WAY AND CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT ACQUISITION YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN CITY PROJECT NO. 461 Parcel P.I.N./ No.* Section Leaal Description 2A 10 10 01000 020 56 2 10 10 01000 010 56 10 01000 010 77 3 11 10 0 110 0 010 51 Apparent Owner Dakota Electric Robert J. O'Neil Northwest Life Insurance Co. Federal Land Co. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Tower Office Bldg. Part. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan -CW Partnership Property Research & Development 0 - 14 - Construction R/W Easement Required Required (Acres) (Acres) 0.74 2.12 0.23 0.36 0.03 0.16 0.2,9 0.11 0.57 0.36 0.97 4.26 5 15 Outlot A, Town Centre 70 First Addition 6 15 Outlot A, Town Centre 100 First Addition 7 15 Outlot'G, Town Centre 100 First Addition 8 15 Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 First Addition 9 15 Outlot E, Town Centre 100 First Addition 10 15 Outlot D, Town Centre 100 First Addition 11 14 Outlot D, Tomark Second Addition TOTAL ® *Parcel Nos. Per Figure No. 7 Apparent Owner Dakota Electric Robert J. O'Neil Northwest Life Insurance Co. Federal Land Co. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Tower Office Bldg. Part. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan -CW Partnership Property Research & Development 0 - 14 - Construction R/W Easement Required Required (Acres) (Acres) 0.74 2.12 0.23 0.36 0.03 0.16 0.2,9 0.11 0.57 0.36 0.97 4.26 ® V. ESTIMATED COSTS The estimated cost for City Project No. 461 is summarized below. The estimate includes construction costs and a 25% allowance for design, inspection, administration and capitalized interest.* A detailed estimate of construction costs is included in the Appendix. ESTIMATED PROJECT COST Improvement Cost Street $1,337,020.00 Storm Sewer $ 130,590.00 Sanitary Sewer $ 11,660.00 Watermain $ 37,630.00 Trail $ 58,870.00 ® Traffic Signal $ 100,000.00 Total Project Cost $1,675,770.00 9 *These costs do not include acquisition of right of way or construction easements. ® VI. BENEFITED PROPERTIES The parcels benefited by the proposed improvements in City Project No. 461 are listed below: Parcel No.. Section 2A 10 2 10 3 11 5 15 6 ® 7 8 9 10 11 C J P.I.N. 10 01000 020 56 10 01000 010 56 10 01000 010 77 10 01100 010 51 Outlot A, Town Centre 70 First Addition 15 Outlot A, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Outlot G, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Outlot E, Town Centre 100 First Addition 15 Outlot D, Town Centre 100 First Addition 14 Outlot D, Tomark Second Addition Apparent Owner Dakota Electric Robert J. O'Neil Northwest Life Insurance Co. Federal Land Co. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan Tower Office Bldg. Part. Eagan Heights Commercial Park Eagan -CW Partnership Property Research & Development The following parties should be notified as the construction will directly affect their properties. Mr. Fred Sell, 1215 Yankee Doodle Road Carriage Hills Homeowners Association g7 - 16 - ® VII. ASSESSMENTS City Project No. 461 is proposed to be assessed to the benefiting properties along Yankee Doodle Road. It is proposed to use the City of Eagan's standard assessment rates for street, storm sewer and trail improvements. The watermain and sanitary sewer laterals are proposed to be assessed directly to the benefiting parcels. Table 2 summarizes the proposed assessments on a parcel by parcel basis. Figure 7 shows the parcels proposed to be assessed. The following is an explanation of proposed assessment rates for the respective types of improvements. STREET AND LATERAL STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS It is proposed to assess street improvements based on the current zoning of the respective parcels Three rates are proposed: • Residential Rate: The basis for this rate is an equivalent 32 foot wide residential street built to current City of Eagan standards. The current residential rate is $33.75 per assessable front foot. This rate would be applied to all parcels currently zoned residential or agricultural. Multiple Residential Rate: The basis for this rate is an equivalent 44 foot wide minor collector street built to City of Eagan standards. The current multiple residential rate is $63.36 per assessable front foot and is proposed to be assessed to parcels zoned as multiple housing (R-3 and R-4). Commercial/Industrial Rate: The basis for this rate is an equivalent 52 foot wide major collector street built to current City of Eagan standards. The current commercial/industrial rate is 78.45 per assessable front foot and is proposed to be assessed to • parcels zoned as commercial or industrial. ® Lateral storm sewer improvements are proposed to be assessed using a ratio determined from the street assessments. A base rate is determined by dividing the total cost of storm sewer improvements .by the total assessable front footage. The determination of a rate for residential and multiple residential is calculated by dividing the standard street rate for each by the standard commercial/industrial rate and then multiplying each times the base rate for storm sewer. The commercial/industrial rate is proposed to be the base rate. Storm sewer assessment rates are proposed as follows: Base Rate = Total Cost = $130,590.00 = $16.72/F.F. Assessable F.F. 7,812.04 F.F. Commercial/Industrial Rate = Base Rate = $16.72/F.F. Multiple Residential Rate = $17.39/F.F. x $63.36 = $13.50/F.F. $78.45 Residential Rate = $17.39/F.F. x $33.75 = $7.19/F.F. • $78.45 0 The proposed combined rate for street and lateral storm sewer improvement assessments would be: Commercial/Industrial $95.17/F.F. ($78.45 + $16.72) Multiple Residential $76.86/F.F. ($63.36 + $13.50) Residential $40.94/F.F. ($33.75 + $7.19) TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS Trail improvements are proposed to be assessed against all commercial/industrial and multiple residential zoned properties. The assessment rate is proposed to be $11.81 per assessable front foot. TABLE NO. 2 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY EAGAN CITY PROJECT NO. 461 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (DAKOTA COUNTY ROAD 28) Assessable Commercial Multiple Watermain Total (*) Front Industrial Residential Residential Trails & Sanitary Estimated Parcel No. P.I.N./Legal Description Footage $95.17/FF $76.86/FF $40.94/FF $11.81/FF Services Assessment Section 10 2A 10 01000 020 56 208.73 8,545.41 8,545.41 2 10 01000 010 56 10 01000 010 77 3,445.60 141,062.86 43,160.00 184,222.86 Section 11 3 10 01100 010 51 135.00 12,847.95 1,594.35 14,442.30 Section 15 5 Outlot A, Town Centre 70 435.43 41,439.87 5,142.43 46,582.30 First Addition 6 Outlot A, Town Centre 100 548.23 52,.175.05 6,474.60 58,649.65 First Addition 7 Outlot G, Town Centre 100 467.55 44,496.73 5,521.77 50,018.50 First Addition 8 Lot 1, Block 1, 620.00 59,005.40 7,322.20 66,327.60 Town Centre 100 First Addition 9 Outlot E, Town Centre 100 180.00 17,130.60 2,125.80 19,256.40 First Addition 10 Outlot D, Town Centre 100 1,163.50 89,426.61 - 13,740.94 103,167.55 First Addition Section 14 11 Outlot D, Tomark Second 458.00 35,201.88 5,408.98 40,610.86 .Addition " Total Estimated Assessments 227,095.60 124,628.49 149,608..27 47,331.07 43,160.00 591,823.43 (f) Parcel No. Per Figure No. 7 0 -------------- ---..� w RESIDENTIAL STREET RATE J IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ST. RATE \\\\\\ COMM./INDUSTRIAL ST. RATE • 75' CORNER LOT CREDIT D STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE NO. 7 CONSUL TING E NGINE ERS I IANO SORVFN ORS PROPOSED YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (CO. RD. 28) ASSESSMENTS EJO TWELVEMGENS KA MI •ESOT 55391 BLVD MINNEfONRN. MINNESOTA SSJ9. (612)4IS.WIB CITY PROJECT NO. 461 COMMISSION NO. 0850678 • • TOTAL ASSESSMENTS Improvement Streets and Storm Sewer Watermain and Sanitary Sewer Trail Total Total Proposed Assessment $501,332.36 $ 43,160.00 $ 47,331.07 $591,823.43 With the City's share being $793,630.00, the $201,806.57 deficit will be the responsibility of the City's Major Street Fund. This deficit will be greatly reduced when Parcel No. 2 (O'Neil property) develops and the City can assess the difference between the zoning at the time of development and the agricultural rate assessed under this project. ® VIII. CITY/COUNTY COST PARTICIPATION It is recommended the City of Eagan enter into a cooperative agreement with Dakota County for cost participation. The following table outlines the proposed city and county percentage for individual types of improvements. City of Eagan Dakota County Improvement Percenta4e Percentage Streets 45 55 Storm Sewer $ 64,510.00 $ 66,080.00 Catch Basins and Leads 45 55 All Other 100 0 New Sanitary Sewer 100 0 New Watermain 100 0 Trails Trails $ 31,540.00 North Side 100 0 South Side 0 100 • Existing Utility Reconstruction 45 55 Traffic Signals 50 50 Right of Way & Construction Easements 45 55 Based on these percentages, the estimated cost for the City of Eagan and Dakota County is estimated to be: Improvement City of Eaaan Dakota County Total Streets $601,660.00 $735,360.00 $1,337,020.00 Storm Sewer $ 64,510.00 $ 66,080.00 $ 130,590.00 Sanitary $ 11,660.00 $ 0.00 $ 11,660.00 Watermain $ 34,2.60.00 $ 3,370.00 $ 37,630.00 Traffic Signals $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 100,000.00 Trails $ 31,540.00 $ 27,330.00 $ 58,870.00 Total $793,630.00 $882,140.00 $1,675,770.00 These costs do not include acquisition of right of way or ® construction easements. 22 - • IX. PROJECT SCHEDULE KI Submit Feasibility Study Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids Award Contract Complete First Construction Phase Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 9� - 23 - January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 February 18, 1986 March, 1986 April„ 1986 Fall, 1986 Spring, 1987 Summer, 1987 May, 1988 0 • APPENDIX y5 - 24 - • • PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE ['OLI:I_E: r;;n(3D EA6r;N FF.O.IECT NO. 461 1 of 2 D STRGAR-ROSCOE-FAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS UNIT TF.h1 N7. STC! DE SC R',iPTI UNIT PRICE QUYNTITY AMOUNT �4�:'1.501 'uB]L[lATI014 01.`11 iCLEi,6 AND GRUB RuADWA`'= SUF;t01i,L 11ISCELI-i!,lEI)U�. Or'. r,0 CWlh11N Ei:Cii�%AIIuH !F'i e15.80:% 5UB6RAIIE EXCAVATIU11 :t0`_.52:] CCMNUt•1 BORF;Gl4 iL,') SUB,I0tAL i3R(.DINO LUHP SUN 10000.00 1 i0000.00 EA -CH 2800 2500.[0 1 2500.00 LUMP SUM 4000.00 1 4000.00 500 1500.00 104.;0'_, 16500.00 C.U. '(G. 2.00 20000 40000.00 CU. YD. 2.00 24002 48000.00 CU. YL. 3.50 50400 176400.00 264'100.00 21!44.501 REr101.�E C12NCRETF CURD & GUTTER LIN. FT. 2.00 2800 5600.00 2104.501 RE:tU7VE: PIPE CULUr:RI I_IN. FT. 5.00 500 1500.00 104.;0'_, RE MMOVF CONCRETE I'IEDIA!`1 SO. FT. 22.00 4000 6000.00 G104.51i5 REi'1OVE BI IU(IINOU5 PAVE1ENI SG!. YD. 2.00 25000 50000.00 2104.5-41 ;ALVA6E FENCE LIN. FT. 3.00 1500 4500.00 1104.62'1 SALVAGE I'IF'E SEWER LIN. FT. 8.00 10'1: 816.00 2iO4.523 SAL VALE. CONCRETE APRON EACH 100.00 11 _ 201.00 101.604 x111.1_ ItI'IUMINOUS SURFACE SO. YD. 2.00 5800 11600.00 SUBTOTAL SALVAGE. AND RENOVALS 8'_++216.00 ['211.501 1)L;GFiF.Gi1TFi BASE CLASS TON 6.50 32000 206000.00 2221.501 AGGREGAIE SHOULDERING CLASS 1 TON 7.00 240 1680.00 23.7,1.504 RIIUNINIIUS MATERIAL. FOR NIa.IURE TUN 220.00 231 52580.00 23:1.514 BASE COURSE NIXI URE TON 12.00 5300 6:'600.00 1. .0 Si=ib11 NG B.11UNINOUS PAVEMENT SURFACE L1•I. FT. .2.00 2676 5752.00 2:41.504 BIIUMINDUS MATERIAL FOR NI:i"!URE TLIN 220.00 235 51100.00 2._41.510 FINDER COURSE HIXILIRE ION 12.00 4700 56400.00 361.504 ii3PHAL! CEIIE14T TUN 225.00 208 46800.00 2:361.508 WEARING COURSE NIYIUF:E ION 15.00 3300 49500.00 %.502 BITUIIINOU5 M:,TERIAL FUR TACK: COAT GAL. 2.00 3200 6400.00 1521.°:0I 4" CONCRE1E MEDIAN SO. FT. 1.00 27000 27000.00 5'1.`_OI CONCRETE CURB AND GUffER. DESIGN B618 LIN. FT. 5150 18530 101.915.00 531.`_0i 6° 1:.0I41:.RE'I'E DRIVEWAY PAVE NEN'I SO. YD. 2;1.00 45 1.125.00 SUBTOTAL PAVING 672452.00 :.211.501 AGGRE13AfE BiiSE CLASS 5 TON 6.50 2400 15600.00 2141.601 2" BITU111NOUS WALK.. PLACED SO. YD. 4.50 7000 31500.00 SUET IAL 1'I?A,il. 47.100.00 2501.571 INSTALL n:C. PIPE :SEWER LIN. F1'. 6.00 10 2 616.00 2508.511 12" RC PIPE BEIviER. LIN. Ff. 22.00 1250 17500.00 1/7/86 COMM. NO. 0850679 5118T01A1. CRAINAGE_ J07.607, 8" FIFE SEWER J."��06.J0if f L(Id3TFIJI CT MANHOLE DESIGN 200 _506.,11 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE SUBTCI AL SANTARY SEWER 104471.00 LIN. FT. 24.00 115 2-160.00 EACH 1000.00 1 1000.00 LIN. FT. 150.00 37 5J65.00 9325.00 504.602 RELOCATE H',DRANT AND 'VALVE EACH 1000.00 - 2000.00 2 of 2 F:ELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 800.00 1 STRGAR-ROSCOETAUSCH,INC. PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE LIN. FT. CONSULTING ENGINEERS • LANDSURVEYORS (ANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN PROJECT NO. 461 1't:" DIP !dATEEh1AIi4 LIN. FT. 30.00 130 [50:.511 1J" PC F'IF'E SEWER 12" WATER EUiI'ERFLY VALVE WITH BO.( LIN. FT. 24.00 860 21120.00 2 03.511 la'" RC F'IF'E SEWER EACH LIN. FT. 28.00 240 6720.00 LSm:i. 731.IdSTALL, CONCRETE A.PI% 1500.00 EACH 100. mm 50.4.602 200. m0 iJmG. JWp CUNSTkI1CT MANHOLE DESIGN 230 ('4'GIA1 EACH 800.00 1 600.00 2506.506 CC1N51RU1T 0A111H0LF. RESIGN 200 300.00 EACH 800.00 3 2400.00 2,06.,5 09 COIiSTRUC1 i;A1CH BASIN DESIGN 230 (4 DIP.) EACH 820.00 4 '200.00 2506.17111 LON:=TRUC,'I Ci;iCH BASIN DESIGN 232 EACH 600.00 37 22200.02 2506.511 RECONSTRUCTMANHOLE 1/7/86 LIN. FT. 150.00 5i 7965. m0 506.516 CASIINC ASSENDLIES NO. EACH 2,0.00 42 10500.00 2511.501 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTINGS EACH 1J2.00 7 1050.02 5118T01A1. CRAINAGE_ J07.607, 8" FIFE SEWER J."��06.J0if f L(Id3TFIJI CT MANHOLE DESIGN 200 _506.,11 RECONSTRUCT MANHOLE SUBTCI AL SANTARY SEWER 104471.00 LIN. FT. 24.00 115 2-160.00 EACH 1000.00 1 1000.00 LIN. FT. 150.00 37 5J65.00 9325.00 504.602 RELOCATE H',DRANT AND 'VALVE EACH 1000.00 - 2000.00 504.60' F:ELOCATE HYDRANT EACH 800.00 1 800.00 1500 6" GIF 41A1EF.MAIIT LIN. FT. 18.00 300 5400.00 •503.603 504.603 1't:" DIP !dATEEh1AIi4 LIN. FT. 30.00 130 3900.00 '04.60: 12" WATER EUiI'ERFLY VALVE WITH BO.( EACH 1200.00 1 1200.00 504.602 6" WATER GATE VALVE WITH BOX EACH 500.00 3 1500.00 504.602 6" 1; 18+" WET TAF' CONNECTION EACH 1500.00 2 3000.00 50.4.602 12" '.i 18" CONNECTION EACH 3000.00 1 31000.00 504.602 ADJUST GATE VALVE EACH 100.00 _ 300.00 J04.620 WATERMA]IJ F11TIPIGS POUND 1.80 5000 4000.00 SUBTOTAL WATERMAIN '0100.00 565.604 TRAFFIC SIGNALS SYSTEM 80000.00 L 80000.00 SUBTOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 80000.00 557.607, INSTALL FENCE LIN. FT.. 3.00 1500 4500.00 257'.,01 ROADSIDE SEEDING ACRE 1500.00 4 6000.00 25%'1.502 SEED MIXTORE NO. 5 POLING 5.00 170 850.00 2575.505 SODDING SO. YD. 2.00 10000 2000Q.@0 2,75.511 MULCH MATERIAL. TYPE 1 DISC- ANCHORED T'111 200.00 7 1400.00 2575.531 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER. ANALYSIS 10-10-10 TOH 300.00 1 300.00 SLiB'TOTA. LANDSCAPING 330JO.00 ® TOTAL PROJECT 1340614.00 qj 1/7/86 COMM. NO. 0850679 9 -10 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PROJECT 452/BERYL POND (STORM SEWER OUTLET) D. Public Hearing for Project 452, Beryl Pond (Storm Sewer Outlet) --In response to a petition received from the developers of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition (Jim Durning) the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to discuss the proposed trunk storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -50 through Rahn Park to Rahn Road. This feasibility report was completed and presented to the Council on January 7 in considera- tion of scheduling a public hearing on February 4. Enclosed on pages�throughis a copy of the feasibility report for the C uncil's information, and review during this public hearing. Because this project requires construction through a portion of Rahn Park, the Public Works Director reviewed this report with the Park Commission at their January 9th meeting. The Park Commission expressed several concerns pertaining to the construction impact on this heavily wooded portion of park property. Subsequently, they requested additional investigation pertaining to alternative alignments which would minimize the impact. The consulting engineering firm of Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc., who prepared the original feasi- bility report, also prepared additional information pertaining to these alternative alignments which will be discussed at the Council meeting for additional c nsideration of project approval. Enclosed on page s_ff�through l is the additional information pertaining to these alternative alignments which have some merit in minimizing impact on park property and its ability to recover .future lateral benefit assessments to help further defer its ultimate cost. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 452 (Beryl Pond - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • .• ON PONDS AP -50, AP -49, AND AP -25 OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.4.52 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA Wgs�:161 FILE N0.49364 i�ossrdficoa, Rade, yq d.1dd, a Adoa&-kA, ✓.ac. Gia.""«g e" St /tea" Af4wwj la q% ef-Ba2adzwe, 11 36 S[, Barr/. M. ,_, 55113 /)Aa,..: 6/2 - 636-4600 December 6, 1985 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Ponds AP -50, AP -49 6 AP -25 Outlets Project No. 452 Our File No. 49364 Dear Mayor and Council: Ouo G. N,.nrrtrou. P.F.", RW..I A. R¢mnr. RE. 111,11/u..I A. Lla,b,,r. 0. E. Rirh... I;. 6-e, P.G. Jmwu lC 011.a. P.li, Glenn R. Coo A. 1•. lir Thomas E. :vnlr, P.h RirhmB n". Fnvrr, 11 G. Rabrrl G. 5,h 0,1 VE, M11arvir: L .lorrulo. P.li. Dowhl C. Jerrr :l. Board,,,. Pre. Afore 1. 7M K, I'MI, P.L. Ifirhael T. Nuur,ramn. klC. Ruben R. Plq/nh, P.E. nariao. carxora. P.E. chadr, A. F.rirF sun Leo .+1. P..W A'r /M. -b" AL Ghen Transmitted herewith is our report for Ponds AP -50, AP -49, and AP -25 Outlets, Project No. 452. This report covers trunk storm sewer construction and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. • We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK S ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH: li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: December 6, 1985 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by:_ Department of Public Works • Date: -- 2311d • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer out- lets for Ponds AP -50, AP -49, and AP -25. This project is the result of a peti- tion received from the owner of the two lots in Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition which includes a portion of Pond AP -50. An office building ex- ists on the southerly lot abutting Pond AP -50 while a future office building is proposed on the northerly lot. Pond AP -49 is included within Rahn Park lo- cated northeasterly of Pond AP -50 and west of Rahn Road. Pond AP -25 is lo- cated easterly of Pond AP -49 directly east of Rahn Road. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan with the exception of the proposed normal water level for Pond AP -49 included in Rahn Park. It is proposed as part of this project the normal water level for Pond AP -49 be lowered to 874.1 as opposed to the recom- mended level of 881.7 in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. A normal water elevation of 881.7 would destroy large established trees around Pond AP -49 and also flood an additional 0.8 acre of land above the 874.1 elevation. To pro- vide a gravity outlet at the lower elevation is more costly (approximately $18,000), however., based on the permanent impact to Rahn Park, it is recom- mended the lower elevation of 874.1 be established as the normal water eleva- tion for Pond AP -49. DISCUSSION: A portion of this project provides for constructing a trunk storm sewer outlet from Pond AP -50 to Pond AP -49. Two alternate alignments are pro- posed for this construction as shown on the attached drawing. Alternate A proposes constructing a 12" RCP gravity storm sewer northerly adjacent to the easterly line of the Cedar Cliff Additions into Rahn Park. The line would continue northerly in Rahn Park and then easterly through a low area to Pond • AP -49. Alternate B proposes constructing the same size gravity sewer easterly Page 1. 2311d /0/ Park along the same alignment as Alternate A to Pond AP -49. The alignment for Alternate B is approximately $12,000 more costly due to deeper cuts and is contingent on future street development through Parcel 011-76. Presently no approved plans exist for development of this parcel. Alternate A, however, does require more ,tree removal and impacts the park property for a greater distance. It is also proposed as part of this project to construct a gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond AP -49 and Pond AP -25 to Pond AP -24. Due to the recom- mended level for Pond AP -49 being lowered, it is necessary that the gravity storm sewer from Pond AP -49 be constructed around Pond AP -25 rather than into it due to its higher water level. The gravity storm sewer from each pond • would then combine as one on the northerly side of Pond AP -25 and continue northerly to an existing 24" RCP storm sewer adjacent to Pond AP -24. It is assumed the gravity storm sewer beneath Rahn Road will be jacked or augered. Design considerations for each pond are listed below: NWL from Pond AP -50 through parcel 011-76 along an anticipated street alignment to (cfs) Rahn Park. The alignment would then continue northerly and easterly in Rahn Park along the same alignment as Alternate A to Pond AP -49. The alignment for Alternate B is approximately $12,000 more costly due to deeper cuts and is contingent on future street development through Parcel 011-76. Presently no approved plans exist for development of this parcel. Alternate A, however, does require more ,tree removal and impacts the park property for a greater distance. It is also proposed as part of this project to construct a gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond AP -49 and Pond AP -25 to Pond AP -24. Due to the recom- mended level for Pond AP -49 being lowered, it is necessary that the gravity storm sewer from Pond AP -49 be constructed around Pond AP -25 rather than into it due to its higher water level. The gravity storm sewer from each pond • would then combine as one on the northerly side of Pond AP -25 and continue northerly to an existing 24" RCP storm sewer adjacent to Pond AP -24. It is assumed the gravity storm sewer beneath Rahn Road will be jacked or augered. Design considerations for each pond are listed below: NWL HWL Storage Outflow Elev. Elev. (Ac.Ft.) (cfs) Pond AP -25 880.5 888.5 22.0 8.5 Pond AP -49 874.1 888.0 22.9 1.0 Pond AP -50 886.0 894.0 12.0 2.8 EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary construction easements are required from the unplatted parcels between Pond AP -50 and Rahn Park and between Pond AP -25 and AP -24. It is assumed for purposes of this report ponding easements for Ponds AP -50, AP -25, and AP -24 will be dedicated at the time they develop. No • easements are proposed to be acquired through Rahn Park. Listed below are the easements required for this project: Page 2. 2311d /Q Y • Parcel Description SW 1/4, SECTION 29 012-50 SE 1/.4, SECTION 30 011-76: Alternate A 011-76: Alternate B Permanent Easement (Acres) 0.4 0.4 0.5 Temporary Easement (Acres) 2.1 1.2 2.8 It is assumed all easements can. be acquired at no cost to the City. AREA TO BE INCLUDED ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 29 SW 1/4, SECTION 29 Parcel 012-50 Parcel 012-50 SE 1/4, SECTION 30 SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 Parcel 011-76 • NE 1/4, SECTION 31 Parcel 012-76 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 011-03 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Pond AP -50 TO AP -49 Alternate A $84,920 Alternate B 96,170 POND AP -49 AND AP -25 TO AP -24 88,570 The total estimated project cost for Alternate A and B is $173,490 and $184,740 respectively which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal engineering, administra- tion, and bond interest. These costs do not reflect any easement acquisition costs. Page 3. 2311d 163 r1 U ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All project costs included herein are considered trunk with the exception of the 24" diameter east -west storm sewer for Alternate B from Pond AP -50. The oversizing cost for this section is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed entirely to Parcel 011-76. Lateral cost will be revised based on final costs. It is also proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area storm sewer assessment which have not been previously as- sessed but benefit from this project. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. TRUNK RATES: Trunk rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: Storm Sewer Single Family $0.050/sq.ft. Comm./Ind. $0.075/sq.ft. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance ALTERNATE A Trunk $173,490 Trunk Area Assessment $178,107 TOTAL $173,490 $178,107 +$4,617 Page 4. 2311d /O �] • Trunk Lateral Trunk Area Assessment Lateral Assessment TOTAL $182,725 2,015 $184,740 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans 6 Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment due with Real Estate Taxes 2311d Page 5. 1005 $178,107 2,015 $180,122 -$ 4,618 January 7, 1986 February 4, 1986 Spring, 1986 Summer, 1986 Fall, 1986 Fall, 1986 May, 1987 ® APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PONDS AP -50, AP -49, & AP -25 -OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 452 ALTERNATE -A - POND AP -50 TO AP -49 1,150 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $23.00/l.f. $26,450 260 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $31.00/l.f. 8,060 130 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $52.00/l.f. 6,760 130 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 30'-35' dp. in pl. @ $64.00/l.f. 8,320 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 950 15 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 900 2 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/ea. 800 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/lin.ft. 1,500 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 4 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Ac. 4,000 1,670 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,670 Total $62,210 +5% Contingencies 3,110 $65,320 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 19,600 TOTAL ALTERNATE A .................................... $84,920 Page 6. 2311d /O • • ALTERNATE B - POND AP -50 TO AP -49 210 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in p1. @ $30.00/l.f. $ 6,300 350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $23.00/l.f. 8,050 330 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $31.00/l.f. 10,230 530 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $52.00/l.f. 27,560 6 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 5,700 60 Lin.ft. MH depth 3,520 greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/l.f. 3,600 2 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 800 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/L.S. 1,500 150 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,500 3 Acres Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Ac. 3,000 1,420 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,420 Total $70,460 +5% Contingencies 3,520 $73,980 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 22,190 TOTAL ALTERNATE B ................................... $96,170 2311d Page 7. /D7 POND AP -49, AP -25 TO EXISTING 24" RCP 200 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $30.00/l.f. $ 6,000 440 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $38.00/l.f. 16,720 340 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 0'-10' dp. in pl. @ $23.00/1.f. 7,820 120 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 10'-20' dp. in pl. @ $31.00/l.f. 3,720 60 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer, 20'-30' dp. in pl. @ $52.00/1'.-f. 3,120 80 Lin.ft. Jack or auger 12" RCP Storm sewer @ $120.00/l.f. 9,600 5 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 4,750 30 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,800 1 Each 24" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $900.00/each 900 2 Each 12" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 800 20 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $1,500.00/L.S. 1,500 200 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,000 3 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Ac. 3,000 1,160 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,160 Total $64,890 +5% Contingencies 3,240 $68,130 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 20,440 I[] TOTAL POND AP -493 AP -25 TO EXISTING 24" RCP ........ $88,570 Page 8. 2311d /o fy ® APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL POND AP -50, AP -49, 6 AP -25 OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMRPOVEMENT PROJECT NO. 452 A.) TRUNK AREA Parcel Area Credit Description (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) SW 1/4, SECTION 29 Parcel 012-50 1,382,000 Pond 295,000 Street 20% SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 NE 1/4, SECTION 31 Parcel 010-02 Parcel 011-03 898.,240 Pond 16,000 Street 20% Assessable Total Area Rate/s.f. Assessment 869,600 $0.075 $,65,220 705,790 $0.050 $ 35,290 859,040 Street 20% 687,230 $0.050 $ 34,362 720,580 Street 20% 576,460 $0.075 43,235 TOTAL........................................... $178,107 B.) LATERAL - ALTERNATE B ONLY Parcel Description SE 1/4, SECTION 30 Parcel 011-76 Page 9. 2311d /199 Total Assessment $ 2,015 zm CEDAR J CLIFF I COMM,.PK. ADD. 0 U N RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL m 12" 012-76 RAHN PARK \`L POND AP -4 ALTERNATE A N 1 _ POND ANTICIPATED—j AP -50 FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT ALTERNATE 8 24 011-76 CLIFF ROAD I CO. RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 i SCALE IN FEET PONDS AP -50, AP -49, AND AP -25 OUTLETS TRUNK STORM SEWER IMP, PROJECT NO. 452 EAGAN, MINNESOTA POND AP -25 BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ConsultingEngineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. Comm.49364 0 1000 2000 N 0 R T H I I CALE IN FEET y u -- -_. Qw O> cr a Y ¢. STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT AREA PONDS AP -50, AP -49, AND BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. AP -25 OUTLETS Consulting Engineers TRUNK STORM SEWER IMP. _ _ St. Paul, Minn. PROJECT NO. 452 Date:DEC., 1985 EAG. NO. EAGAN, MINNESOTA �/� ( Comm. 49364 — 4.444.4 a 4: 36 St., P—d,, d1 55113 /)Ae.r.: 612 - 636-4600 January 16, 1986 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert Re: Pond AP -50, AP -49 and AP -25 Outlets Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements - Project No. 452 Our File NO. 49364 Dear Tom, Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keilh A. Gordon. P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E R,,hardW Foser, P.E. Rohe" G. Schunichr, P.E Maevin L, S.,.ha, P.E. Donald C. Burkord,, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P E. Ted K. Field, P.E hh,hW T. Ramnronn. P,E. Roberr R. PJeff,,le,. P.E. DaWd O. Lasko.. PE Charles A. Er,,kmn leo M. Pawelsk, Harlon M. Ohoo Per your request I have evaluated two alternate alignments for the trunk storm sewer proposed as part of the above project. Attached is a drawing which ® shows the two alternate alignments designated as Alternate C and D. Both Al- ternate C and D are a continuation of Alternate B presented in the preliminary report. Alternate C is located within a future street right-of-way which is contingent on development. Alternate D is located adjacent to the north line of the unplatted parcel and not in the park. However, as Alternate D contin- ues north along Rahn Road its location would be such that the existing side- walk along Rahn Road would not be disturbed. Therefore, the storm sewer alignment would be included within a portion of the park. Alternate D would also require a significant amount of tree removal due to the number of trees located along its alignment and the depth of sewer (20'-35' deep). ,Listed below is a cost comparison of the 4 alternates including Alternate A 5 B presented in the preliminary report: OBo G. Bnnes"M P.E. p Ri.h,,, W. Rome, P.E. lnsenh C Anderlik, P.E. to AP -25 Bmellorrl A. Lemh,,. P.E. Rhhmd E Torn,,, P.E. to Ex. 24" Jumer C. Ohnn, P.E. Re: Pond AP -50, AP -49 and AP -25 Outlets Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements - Project No. 452 Our File NO. 49364 Dear Tom, Glenn R. Cook, P.E. Keilh A. Gordon. P.E. Thomas E. Noyes, P.E R,,hardW Foser, P.E. Rohe" G. Schunichr, P.E Maevin L, S.,.ha, P.E. Donald C. Burkord,, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanson, P E. Ted K. Field, P.E hh,hW T. Ramnronn. P,E. Roberr R. PJeff,,le,. P.E. DaWd O. Lasko.. PE Charles A. Er,,kmn leo M. Pawelsk, Harlon M. Ohoo Per your request I have evaluated two alternate alignments for the trunk storm sewer proposed as part of the above project. Attached is a drawing which ® shows the two alternate alignments designated as Alternate C and D. Both Al- ternate C and D are a continuation of Alternate B presented in the preliminary report. Alternate C is located within a future street right-of-way which is contingent on development. Alternate D is located adjacent to the north line of the unplatted parcel and not in the park. However, as Alternate D contin- ues north along Rahn Road its location would be such that the existing side- walk along Rahn Road would not be disturbed. Therefore, the storm sewer alignment would be included within a portion of the park. Alternate D would also require a significant amount of tree removal due to the number of trees located along its alignment and the depth of sewer (20'-35' deep). ,Listed below is a cost comparison of the 4 alternates including Alternate A 5 B presented in the preliminary report: Page 1. 2944d // 'J Pond AP -49 Pond AP -50 Pond AP -50 to AP -25 to AP -49 to AP -25 to Ex. 24" Total Alternate A 84,920 -- 88,570 173,490 Alternate B 96,170 -- 88,570 184,740 Alternate C -- 168,440 88,570 257,010 Alternate D 159,550(1) -- 88,570 248,120 (1) Pipe connects to pipe from Pond AP -49 to AP -25 As noted, Alternate C and D are approximately $70,000 higher than Alternate A ® and B. However, if for Pond AP -49 may Alternate A or B are not to be never be required assuming this considered, then an portion of park is outlet never developed. Therefore, the line from Pond AP -49 to the 24" line from Pond Page 1. 2944d // 'J • City of Eagan January 16, 1986 Eagan, MN 55121 Re: File No. 49364 AP -25 would not be required. The estimated cost of this line and the over - depth associated with the 24" RCP is $50,200. Therefore, the total cost of Alternate C could be reduced by $50,200 while the total cost for Alternate D could be reduced by $43,400. The cost reduction for Alternate D is less due to the additional cost associated with crossing Rahn Road. As previously noted, Alternate D initially proposed to discharge into the line on the west side of Rahn Road. As a result, if the line from Pond AP -49 is not construc- ted then Alternate D would have to cross Rahn Road on its own. In summary, if an outlet for Pond AP -49 is not required, then Alternate C and D are approximately $25,000 higher than Alternate A and B. It should also be noted that the alignment for Alternate C may generate a lateral benefit as- sessment some time in the future since,jt is anticipated a future storm sewer from this intersection to Pond AP -25 will be required. In addition, if it's determined an outlet for Pond AP -49 is never required, it is still recommended the 24" line from Pond AP -25 to the existing 24" be con- structed at a proper elevation to provide an outlet for Pond AP -49, if it is ever desired. The estimated cost for this overdepth is $5,000. • If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li cc: Ken Vraa RWR ® Page 2. - 2944d 113 r RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C3 EX. 12' 012-76 RAHN PARK ALTERNATE A POND �V AP -50 I I 1 I � 24'I' I CLIFF ROAD �. \2 \`Z 12 ALTERNATE D ALTERNATE C ANTICIPATED FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT -ALTERNATE B 011-76. CO. RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 SCALE IN FEET PONDS AP -50. AP-49,.AND AP -25 OUTLETS ....... . TRUNK STORM. SEWER IMP_ PROJECT NO. 452 EAGAN, MINNESOTA R POND AP -25 0 o: BONESTROO. ROSENE..ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting, Engineers_ St. Paul, Minn. . Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. Comm.49364 I C:C. CEDAR J COMM. CLIFF CO MM. PK. ADD. F~- ADD. O 2 O N RAHN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL C3 EX. 12' 012-76 RAHN PARK ALTERNATE A POND �V AP -50 I I 1 I � 24'I' I CLIFF ROAD �. \2 \`Z 12 ALTERNATE D ALTERNATE C ANTICIPATED FUTURE STREET ALIGNMENT -ALTERNATE B 011-76. CO. RD. 32 FUTURE POND EASEMENT N O R T H 0 400 800 SCALE IN FEET PONDS AP -50. AP-49,.AND AP -25 OUTLETS ....... . TRUNK STORM. SEWER IMP_ PROJECT NO. 452 EAGAN, MINNESOTA R POND AP -25 0 o: BONESTROO. ROSENE..ANDERLIK 3 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting, Engineers_ St. Paul, Minn. . Date: DEC., 1985 FIG. No. Comm.49364 Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT/BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION E. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Tollefson Builders, Inc., (Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition) --We have received a petition to vacate a portion of an existing ten -foot, side -lot line drainage and utility easement due to an approximate three-foot encroachment by the recent construction of the single-family dwelling on this property. In reviewing this petition, the staff has considerable reservations in approving this vacation due to the depth and location of their recently constructed sanitary sewer line within this side -lot line easement. In discussion with the proposed future homeowner and Tollefson Builders, Inc., the City Attorney and Public Works Director felt it would be in the City's best interest to require a hold harmless agreement to be executed by all three parties to limit the City's potential future liability that may be associated with damage to this dwelling unit resulting from settlement of the backfill material within this utility easement. 'teQo a he petition to vacate this easement on January the Council scheduled the public hearing for February 4 with the understanding that this agreement would be executed by all • appropriate parties as a condition of favorable approval.'., As of this date, the staff has received information indicating the homeowner will not execute this agreement. Therefore, the staff is recommending that this vacation not be approved at the time of the public hearing. All other notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies with no other objections received to date. Enclosed on page is a survey showing the relationship of the house to t e easement, property line and sanitary sewer alignment. . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of the utility easement as described' over Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition. 115 I ■ �1 30� L NORTH 7 SCALE 1"-30 N I sN r4 13 14 city of eagan standard PUBLIC SRITANY ADD. approved: plate WORKS -. Lc7r S $ - DEPARTMEN • ke -- . is Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT/WILDERNESS RUN '5TH ADDITION F. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Wilderness Run 5th Addition) --On January 7th, the Council received a petition requesting the vacation of common lot line drainage and utility easements over Lot 13, Block 6, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 7, of the Wilderness Run 5th Addition which were subsequently replatted into Lots 1, 2 and 3, and City parkland in Block 1, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, of Wilderness Run 6th Addition. When these lots were replatted, the underlying common lot line drainage and utility easements were never formally vacated. Subsequently, they show up on the newly -created lots in property description and title searches. All notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utilities informing them of this proposed vacation. As of this date, no objections have been received and it is r-ecommen ed that it be given favorable consideration. Enclosed on page is a map and description of the proposed easement vacation.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of common lot line drainage and utility easements over portions of Block 6 and 7 of Wilderness Run 5th Addition. O _ _ - • [3-:5 i - 101.81 �� o rvq o _ ,ori I 10tg1 '� o v/ m� o Ei 1 g I I 3 -- _ 14627 /� I'a 12 1 a 1- NO°23.56.. W,_ -� w ../' � _-N9°n'S5' _ P V : 0 3 0 I- t•I_5 �t, `d rvp N o 7.g o 2 11 I L -_-136.23--J im v -7 �.1` r--NO°2356"W-� m m:v,'----N6'28'20"f n m \ 43!17 /O 1 N-ra' P gH 159.52 o 9. 0 1O 488.67 a__ $000 V _j / I :T,� o o P itf i l • O 2e • / P. N A I1 5 y / \ f 9ve / ! /•" \ 9000 /� B\/ _ 0 104.09 ' a °' _ -' N6°28.02.. rR r '26°39'2x'• o •A I.. E -� o 0 �` X80. O i 1 Q O _ 432.17_ _ J/ 00\ -539 24'• A C W l/ 638 / 3.72 118.04 O I P m 7 wO /a 0/0�oy,'I '0430oi 1127 63850/O L A , _ -\0M1�14049- 0 .0=371.49ef0/ , \� A_ I7O. OO -- 11 2 W- I O A, O / L-,.NTe 2P 23 5& i / J 1 t I m � - 135.08- J j 'Itd / n m I 300. 30 176 59 _ 8^ N7° �-•1 _ L_ i„ ' \- m M J LQ 5318" E -127.32_ 0 I- 'O� _ .,�� 0 1 �,��% nnry;i lr 11J' J - - W N d II ea / en r ' P 111.69. a h V 0 to F.,In Oo I rCF(i.i. SJ an cv 1':ILL'/tl14.11 a�i Aa 843 1 '1 o iOD 'L //�� c '1 L�C_IS°28'31•• �'=I•. I,I / ` , L.i G {.204.79 , A,= 7°37 38" _- J '1 .. Ui G.BPNO°0944 W R=424.71 /M-3 L LAKE +l(vll C /00 q �• n, a^' 59.19 ■ yfl'h`�e °� .�■ R= 372.12 f _C B N 9005'40"E ■ Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT/NORTHVIEW MEADOWS ADDITION G. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview Meadows Addition) --We have received a petition to vacate the common lot line drainage and utility easements shared by Lots 1,, 2, 3, 4 and 5, of Block 4, of Northview Meadows Addition. This request results from the developers desire to consolidate these five lots into three larger lots through either a replatting or a revision to the originally approved plat which will be discussed later on this agenda. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies. We have received a response from Dakota Electric indicating their concerns pertaining to the easements adjacent to public right-of-way for all five lots.. If this requested vacation is approved, it should be subject to the condition that adequate and drainage and utility easements be rededicated over the newly approved lot lines prior to the .filing of the vacation order at the County. is a• map showing the location of the ease- ments requested to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the requested drainage and utility easements subject to a rededication of all required drainage and utility easements. i�9 �._ F!e arc r�-questin- to vacate all of the esistin Qrainae and utility easements '::itSin the following described lots: Lot .1, 2; 3, and o, Dloc'.: .102T:a'I '. ., ADOIdS, accordin- to ae record --d plat thereof, Dakota County, 71innesota. e psi PE p 0 °0 i� \fs� / g o i \\I I 19, 69, 0.000.00 : g.. DRAWACE AND UTILITY <)I D• I <)I0 g �� EASEM£NT5 ARE SHOWN THUS:Zo•a000, y e oo 18"E S ^ 0�ti< �� 1 ` ---w� -� r--��----- P� g�j9F 0 OOpti 0� \ !� --60.0 r, S/5 �, moo•. \ a��46 being S�eelin width, unless otherwise °� a5 E \ , D , --I 000,418 indlcaled, and ad�a,n;n¢ /o/ lints, as a �h oti a; b c \ �2a, shown and 10,ew In wr and o&ininJQ Q s \jr slree/ lines, or shown on /he o% iy CI N o �.J' hj�'A 16. /^ % X.. o_ F \� ; 0 17 ��\ _.; Vit, 7__ 426-1 �8\. .. LIIL��m 46 5 // ab jo- 4)Eq3 ,. \/�--L�� II1H 37•o0 o30 30 ca�ti 3 kfcl .✓O.01 47 ✓0.00 : ' d = 29'00 � ' % -<`� / v / h o °367 /8SD +i' •• / / C° r,�, (,yr 2. < l / _ �' \� O� • EFS / / \ orl�o° �ti\/ // \!s 3A •` .,j�-C V.. No°oi 49 E - 50 .6�21 )pq / 22�i 23 \44 11 .............. DFmores EsEmEr rr To BC VACA E> 1 100 200 14 1 b 115 1 w' .16 3 17 v /ZU 60_¢0 X60.00 I.. 6a.00 j 160.00 i m lI 1¢ SaAV 319 °367 /8SD +i' •• / / C° r,�, (,yr 2. < l / _ �' \� O� • EFS / / \ orl�o° �ti\/ // \!s 3A •` .,j�-C V.. No°oi 49 E - 50 .6�21 )pq / 22�i 23 \44 11 .............. DFmores EsEmEr rr To BC VACA E> 00 0 100 200 l SCALE /N FEET 3 /ZU ® Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen 0 VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/BLUE GENTIAN ROAD H. Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian Road) --This public hearing to vacate this public right-of- way was continued from the January 7, 198'6, City Council, meeting, due to an error in the description published for the required legal notification. In reviewing the description that was sub- sequently republished for this item, another error was discovered which precipitates the necessity to again continue this item until the February 18th meeting to insure that this vacation can be properly recorded at Dakota County,. Therefore, no discus- sion pertaining to the actual vacation will be provided by staff unless specifically requested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing to vacate public right-of-way for Blue Gentian Road until February 18, 1986. /Z/ .0 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty CONTINUED FINAL ASSMT HEARING/MISCELLANEOUS APPEALS. I. Continued Final Assessment Hearing - Miscellaneous Appeals --At the November 19, 1985, Council meeting, the City Council reviewed the final assessments for several property owners who had submitted objections at the original September 17 final assessment hearing. At that time, they referred these appeals and objections to the Special Assessment Committee which met on January 16. As a result of the Special Assessment Committee review and recommendations, these final assessment hearings for these appellant property owners had been continued to the February 4 Council meeting for final review and determination by City Council. The following is a list of those property owners and their related assessments:. PROPERTY/OWNER PROJECT Don Vogtman 411 Lot 7 & N' Lot 6, Trunk Area Skovdale Addn. Storm Sewer ----------------------------------- Victor Staff 411 Lot 5, Skovdale Addn. Trunk Area Storm Sewer ----------------------------------- ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT $3,455.15 PROPOSED REVISED ASSESSMENT $1,485.00 • ---------------------------- •) $2,970.00 $2,227.59 Ronald Doyle 411 $3,712.50 Deleted 10-02200-011-86 Trunk Area from Project Storm Sewer ------------------------------------------------------------------ Lillian McCarthy 411 $2,970.00 No Change 10-02200-010-02 Trunk Area Storm Sewer. -------------------------------------------------------------------- The referenced revisions to the original proposed final assessments are based. on detailed review and subsequent recommendations of the Special _Assessment Committee which are being presented to the Council for their formal ratification and adoption. However, it is recommended that the continued final assessment for Lillian McCarthy be continued until the February 18 meeting to. allow renotification.of that property owner due to anticipated continued objections. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and adopt the final assessments for the first three property owners and to continue the public hearing for the fourth property owner (Lillian McCarthy) to the February 18, 1986, Council meeting. • • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-one PARK CONSULTANT/APPOINTMENT & FEE SCHEDULE A. Park Consultant Appointment & Fee Schedule Consideration— TheDirector of Parks & Recreation has contacted Tim Erkkila, formerly of Erkkila & Associates, and now a principal with Westwood Planning, concerning his reappointment in the 19'86 fee schedule. Parks & Recreation Director Vraa has contacted Mr. Erkkila asking that additional information be provided and, more specifically, reviews the consulting arrangement and fee schedule to be offered' by his firm. A copy of that letter is enclosed on page (s) 2 /y vim. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter that was referenced at t e 'last City Council meeting that was received by the Director of Parks & Recreation February 1, 1985, that announced Mr.. Erkkila's merger with Westwood Planning. Please refer to page-ZZ/,7-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the appointment of Westwood Planning & Engineering Company/Principal of Tim Erkkila, as the City's park consultant and, further, the fee schedule as presented for that consulting service for 1986.. /z 3 r] • WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY ,I-`A.i 4 tq* January 9, 1986 Honorable Mayor & City Council Members % Ms. Holly Duffy City Administrative Offices 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Consultant - Park Planner - 1986 Fee Schedule Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Thank you for reminding me to forward my 1986 hourly fee proposal. You will notice that we.are using a May 1984 schedule (attached). We shall honor it thoughout all of the calendar year 1986. This charge rate is an increase from our 1985 arrangement which was though Erkkila & Associates but honored by Westwood Planning & Engineering Company (since Erkkila merged with Westwood just days after submitting its hourly schedule to the City). The greatest change is in Principal Planner/Landscape Architect (my time). Associate Landscape Architect will be $28.50/hr. This is only slightly higher than the previous hourly charge ($25.00/hr.) and the bulk of our charges are logged by this type of employee. We look forward to working with the City again this year. Sincerely, WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY Tim Erkkila, ASLA Vice President of Planning TE: pan cc: Ken Vraa Attachment 7415 WAYZATA BOIILEVAHD, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (51 2) 54G0155 7ST# / s C7 WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY FEF. SCHEDULE FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES May 1, 1984 In general, where it is possible to determine in advance the Scope of a Project and the time and effort the Project will require, the fee basis for Engineering Services will be a percentage of construction cost of lump sum. Where it is impossible... because of the complex nature of work task:: that are -;ar-iabl^_ 1.n reture and where the time required is controlled by the Client, citizen involvement, environmental problems and, in general, where the time requirement is beyond the control of. the Consultant... the following fee schedule will apply. Classification Principal Engineer ....................................... 54.00 Principal Planner .............::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 54.00 Principal Landscape Architect. 54.00 Engineer ................................................. 42.00 Senior Planner .................... 42.00 Senior Landscape Architect ............................... 42.00 Associate Planner or Landscape Architect ................. 28.50 Senior Construction Coordinator .......................... 40.00 Senior Engineering, Technician 6 Construction Observer.... 34.00 Engineering Technician ................................... 28.50 Draftsman ................................................ 22.00 Typist ................................................... 15.00 Two—Man Survey Crew ...................................... 61.00 Three—Man Survey Crew .................................... 73.00 7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55426 (612) 546-0155/ 5 February 1, 1985 Mr. Ken Vraa, Director of Park and Recreation,�G�� City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road A OUT Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Ken: I have a special announcement for you. I am now the Director of Planning for Westwood Planning & Engineering. This merger happened very suddenly. I hoped to tell you personally but word is "leaking out" faster than I can schedule our meeting. Effective immediately all work which I was involved with for you as • Erkkila & Associates will be done in my.new office. My employees (Gordy and Anne) will continue working for me in the new offices at Westwood. Westwood shall honor all contracts and existing work arrangements of Erkkila & Associates. Eventually you will not receive letters, invoices or anything from me as Erkkila & Associates, but only as ,Westwood Planning & Engineering Company. I am very pleased with this change in business. We will have a greater ability to respond to your needs. I have a total of five (5) planners and landscape architects, plus civil engineers to bring in on projects. I plan to continue serving you in the same way; if not in better ways in the future. You should start using the following address and phone number to contact me: WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY 7415 Wayzata Boulevard Minneapolis, MN 55426 (612) 546-0155 The office move has already occurred so no disruption of your service is expected. Communications via my previous phone number or address are being forwarded. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, w Tim Erkkila, ASLA ERKKILA & ASSOCIATES Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council i-;eeting Page Twenty-two AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS B. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Airport Noise Committee --At the City's organizational meeting that. was held on January 21, 1986, a determination was made that the Airport Noise Committee would consist of seven (7) members of which three (3) members will serve a one-year term and four will serve two-year terms. Since this Committee' is a special ad hoc Committee and not a formal Commission, members of the City Council expressed a desire to contact residents who might be interested in serving as members of the Committee. Those members of the Committee seeking continued appointment are Tom Baker, John Gustin, Carolyn Braun, Carol Pozois, and Joe Harrison. Those persons seekinq appointment er, who has. attended several meetings and resides at 2970 nide Avenue., Brad Farnumand Mike Beard who have � submitted letters attached on pages �l?e and Z22—i and W. Dustin • Mirich. City Councilmembers should contact/ any individuals they feel m'ig'ht be interested in serving on the Airport Noise Committee for the one or two vacant seats in order that formal appointments can be made on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM To to a_ one-year term and four to a two-year Noise Committee total of seven members. Q� 1 appoint three term to the members ., _Y� � 'I �N © TA o �.\.\ )1_1� 11\ 0 • •. .,W.Toj% He•Dac-5 PES rxv - 14mPGEfp Sii7 UKc -M /IP�Y Fol coAapte SIOAJ10 i,,ylcrl ,,n5 A.7uL7Q- ris,Xa A&AWHrLY iA) r•:m 6dGA'- NewS'We-%5- 7-,,14wK 5 4 fy. `,,Sv7 I'te • January 16, 1986 Ms. Beatta Blomqulst Mayor 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: EAGAN AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE Dear Ms. Blomquist: I would appreciate it if you consider this letter my application for committee membership to the Airport Noise Committee. I reside at 4305 Orion Lane and have lived In Eagan almost two years. I have a fairly extensive background in local government and have served on several metro wide boards. I have followed the airport noise Issue fairly closely In the newspapers and have been talking and meeting with Tom.Hedges and Jon Hoeinstein about its implications for Eagan. I am extremely angered by the noise we are experiencing over our home and I am willing to contribute my time, energy and Ideas to my community. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at my home 452-0980 or at work 224-1500. Thank you for your consideration of my application. BF/eh /7 Sincerely, 4i�� Brad Farnham Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-three ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT APPOINTMENTS C.. Appointments to the City of Eagan's Economic Development Commission --It was determined at the January 21 organizational meeting that a term of service would not be established for the Economic Development Commission. All members serve at the will of the City Council's appointment and it was determined that, typically, reappointments would be made when a member resigns, misses three meetings without a reasonable excuse or the City Council determines it is in the best interest of the City to remove that individual. Appointments are required for three (3) positions on the Commission. The Plant Manager/Industrial Owner position has been vacated by John McCall, who is experiencing a transfer at Economics Laboratory. The second position is Real Estate Profession where Mark Parranto served as the Commis- sion's representative and did formally resign during the fall of 1985. Thirdly, Local Media was represented by Edna Street, who has attended a meeting during 1985 and apparently has -the community. For additional information on the original makeup of the local government designation of the Eagan Economic Development Commission, please refer to a three • (3) page document that was adopted by the City Council at tte December 6, 1983, meeting. Please reference pages /3/ through 33 The City Administrator was direc�c5 cu uo:cacC certain individuals who made application for the Planning Commission wlo might be interested in serving as a member of this Commission. Bob Shields, who is a real estate manager for Coldwell Banker in Apple Valley, has been contacted and is veru interested in the. Real Estate Profession appointment. George Traynor, wrio is president of Courseware Applications, is also very interested in seeking an appointment as the Plant Manager/Industrial Owner category. Mr. John King, who has a media in communications background and applied for the Cable Commission, is interested in serving 'as the Economic Development Commission's Local Media representative. All three (3) of these persons were contacted during the past wee!, and, as stated, would like to be considered for an appointment. It was clearly stated to these individuals that members of the City Council might have other individuals they would like to consider and, in any event, the appointments would be given consideration at thc_ Fchruary 4 City Counc: meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny appoint- ments to the Economic Development Commission. /30 LOCAL GOVERNMENT OF EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION The Eagan City Council created an Economic Development Com- mission on December 6, 1983 to create and implement an economic development master plan for the community. Attached is a copy of the minutes of that meeting. This Commission is represented by the following persons: A regular meeting date, the first Wednesday of each month at 12:00 noon, is the time and day the Eagan Economic Development Commission meets at the Municipal Center building.. The Commission has standing Committees consisting of the following: 1. Economic Development & Community Assessment 2. Public Relations 3. Labor Distribution & Industrial Call A. Executive /3 2-1. 1. Plant Manager/Industrial Owner: John McCall 2. Financial Profession: Dick Stevenson 3. Real Estate Profession: Mark Parranto 4. Local Media: Edna Street 5. Local Utility Service: Roger Lee 6. Local Retail Trades: Larry Krannig 7. City Government Service: Tom Hedges 8. City Service Area: David Kleimola 9. Ad Hoc: Larry Wenzel, as Immediate Past President of the Chamber of Commerce A regular meeting date, the first Wednesday of each month at 12:00 noon, is the time and day the Eagan Economic Development Commission meets at the Municipal Center building.. The Commission has standing Committees consisting of the following: 1. Economic Development & Community Assessment 2. Public Relations 3. Labor Distribution & Industrial Call A. Executive /3 2-1. • The Commission receives a yearly budgetary allocation from the Eagan City Council. Staff support is provided from the City of Eagan through the office of the City Administrator. In addition to the City Ad- ministrator's office, the Department of Planning is also availa- ble to the Economic Development Commission to meet with pro- spective new industry and process any graphics and reports re- garding community development as requested by the Commission. The Mayor and two members of the City Council participate as ad hoc members of the Commission on a regular basis. 0 ATTENDANCE AT STAR CITY CONFERENCE Representatives of the Economic Development Commission participated in the 1984 Star City Conference which was held on May 16 and May 17, 1984. Those in attendance for the entire conference were the Commission's Chairman Larry Wenzel, Vice - Chairman Roger Lee and Commission member Thomas Hedges. Also attending a portion of the conference were Commission members Richard Stevenson, Edna Street and David Kleimola. City Adminis- trative staff designated to the Economic Development/Star City project Holly Duffy and Ed Meister were also in attendance at one or two special sessions pertaining to various committee work they were coordinating for the Star City designation. /3v 2-2 I❑ L The knowledge gained at the Star City's conference was the most important ingredient for completing the Star City designation and also for establishing criteria for an ongoing Economic Development Commission. The City will support future Star City conferences by providing attendance and participation in the various seminars that are offered through that forum. Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meetingk Page Twenty-four GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMIS N D.. Appointments to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commis- sion --At the last regular City Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare additional information regarding the responsibilities of Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission members. The City of Eagan is responsible for the appointment of three members to that watershed management group. It is recommended that the Director of Public Works be one of those appointments. According to recent state legislation, each community within the metropolitan area was required to enter into a Joint Powers Agreement establishing a Watershed Management Organization (WMO). This Joint Powers Agreement provided for the establishment of a Commission to manage the affairs of this WMO. The makeup of this Commission is to consist of three representatives from the City of Eagan and two representatives each from Mendota. -Hei hts river Grove Heights. This seven -member Commission its capacity through the establishment and adoption of the WMO`s management plan after which Mendota Heights and Inver Grove Heights would withdraw one member each, leaving a five -member Commission to manage the ongoing affairs of the WMO. The purpose of this WMO is to provide an organization to preserve and use the natural water storage and retention of the Gun Club Lake Watershed to: a. Reduce to the greatest practical extent capital expenditures necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of runoff. b. Improve water quality. C. Prevent flooding and erosion from surface flows. d. Promote ground water recharge. e. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities. f. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper manage- ment of surface water. g. Carry out- all the duties and responsibilities outlined in Minnesota Statutes 473,.875 through 473.883. Other than the Director of Public Works, the staff does not have any other recommendations. -for representatives to this Commis- sion. It is anticipated that the Commission will meet monthly until the WMO's operational and management plan has been completed and, thereafter, 2-3 times a year for organizational business (i.e. budget, capital improvement, permit issuance, etc.) �3 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 198.6,: City Council Meeting Page Twenty-five, The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss in further detail the purpose and responsibilities of the WMO to help the Council arrive at proper representative appointments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint three members to represent the City of Eagan to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization,. 0 z ® Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting n \rD R Page Twenty-six �� y`� c 451 000 SPERRY PROPOSAL e,c`'`�00 pp i E. Sperry Proposal for New Marketing and Sales Facility --The Sperry Corporation has notified the City of Eagan that it isle° one of several locations being considered a new marketing and o- Qf"N sales facility. All other sites are located outside the State of Minnesota. City Councilmembers are discussing a number of� O tangible and other incentives for use in the City's proposal in hopes that the Sperry Corporation will select Eagan as a oO site for a new marketing and sales facility. The City Administrator will further discuss the proposal at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Any formal action will,ik depend on further development of the proposal prior to the City1 Council meeting. /lam kY, u O " USE PERMIT/HONG WONG RESTAURANT ON -SALE R F. Reconsideration of Conditional Use Permit for Hong Wong • Restaurant to Allow On -Sale Liquor License --At the last regular City. Council meeting, a motion was approved denying a conditional use permit for Hong Wong Restaurant to allow an on -sale liquor license. The applicant has contacted almost all of the neighbors adjacent to the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center and those contacted have signed a petition stating they have no objection regarding the on -sale liquor license application as submitted by Hong Wong Restaurant. Copies of those petitions are enclosed on. pages -3 through_. For another copy of the City Planner's report and action taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to that report and minutes found on pages /03 through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) A motion for reconsider- ation- of this agenda item is required before the conditional use permit application can be further considered. 2)If the motion for reconsideration is approved, then action is in order to approve or deny the conditional use permit to allow - Hong Wong Restaurant an on -sale liquor license.. IkP 9P .HCl TO THE CITY COUNSIL OF EAGAN WE THE UNDERSIGNED ARE THE NEIGHBORS/RESIDENTS OF HONG WONG RESTAURANT ( 2139 CLIFF ROAD, EAGANI) AT CIDAR/ CLIFF SHOPPING CENTER. WE HAVE NO OBJECTION ABOUT THEIR APPLICATION FOR THE ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE( SERVICE BAR ONLY). ADDRESS C00% 0 M( It coo" Pk / 16Lk a�33 C�L� Rd. ,1/,5 0-4- '4 U Lot b L lz � /. Lot 9� fSLK t' ✓ / >�IZ.01-10 MCA pp %0C* eppfa cra PAfz C wwWGr -1- 137 Lot S 13LIC2 `crr,V :.111 +1 [ .+moi c— ;::� (v BLIc 2 rLo}Ir r' d -b; :�:XC If -1 Left 800 ,4� . 4d' i11^ ' 1 `_)- l Z ✓ �� 1 ! c �%UJi2 gLK3 Oji+- ,/- L) - �C I . -1- 137 • • CONT. P.1 NAME ADDRESS DATE L04- Z, !3[KS �• �/3:,; %�,�,`;�,lVii/ Laf Sj soe- Lod-B S i f 25 8(, BckS�/ Bcic ✓ �. . Loi -N=- [SLOG92, -�� $art Loi- 07t SLlc.1'I _- Loi b/L OcK2 LO -4- . 40 S/�j/Cf SC�i T Tcaj 04() rsLI' - 2 - f• -- 94, • TO THE CITY COUNSIL OF EAGAN WE THE; UiVDERSIGNED — WOULD LIKE TO SEZ THAT HONG WONG RESTAURANT (2139 CLIFF ROAD, EAGAN) AT CEDARCLIFF SHOPPING CENTER GET TTHEIR ON SALES LIQUOR LICENSE (SERVICE BAR ONLY) AND START SERVING LIQUOR IN THE NEAR FUTURE. NAME ADDRESS DATE i c /'1%/mac7 ; 2 5- /-aS-L6 c.� I • CONT. P. NA il'13� / J 0 LJ Q ? 4�-4s�P& ,(?Yl ". ca.,IS�, 733 4�sz) / Se �,6: /—/—%f,e- /A -P S -L/-D/(14N- c4�—�OV7 y Ali - /— J- S �� 44,20 si P�Q i `�,o- / At E %� 0 CONT. F._9 NAP,9E ADDRESS J DATE 4ZJ�� �� Jo�S. P/fPii r K/I �Vy CONT. F.* NAME ADDRESS DATE a 5,�D v 9/xc • /�v Agenda Information Memo ®, February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty-seven Cl 0 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR HONG WONG RESTAURANT G. On -Sale Liquor License for Hong Wong Restaurant - Cedar Cliff Shopping Center --The on -sane liquor license for Hong Wong Restaurant will be given consideration if the conditional use permit allowing an on -sale liquor license is granted. There were questions raised at the last City Council meeting regarding a recent codification of liquor license policies that occurred with the new City Code. According to the City Clerk"s office, the original li uor license policy, a copy is enclosed on pages % /!1through, was incorporated into the new City Code. The Director of Finance has prepared a memo that provides a cross-reference between the policies and the City Code, enclosed on page for your reference. The Hong Wong Restaurant appears to meet 11 the criteria with the exception of the appraised value. According to the liquor license policies adopted in the City Code, "No on -sale liquor license shall be allowed for any establishment unless the investment in the building or portion of the building associated with the liquor license is equal to or greater than $200,000." The City has researched the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center square footage and estimated building valuation. The square footage of the center is 37,900 square feet while the restaurant is 2,660 square feet_ Therefore, the restaurant represents approximately 7% of the building. The total building valuation is approximately $1,7.05,500 and 7% of the total building valuation is $120,000. This information is based on discussion between the City Clerk's office and the County Assessor's office. If it is the City Council's intention to include fixtures and kitchen equipment, the valuation. in cost would' be considerably greater than the $120,000. A represen- tative of the applicant will bring a letter to the City Council meet- ing regarding the valuation of the building_ The Police Department has been conducted and they find no reason to deny the application. A copy of the .liquor license_ application is enclosed without page number for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an on -sale liquor license for Hong Wong Restaurant as presented. Special Note: A quick review of the petition indicates several signatures by residents from other communities and areas of Eagan that are not directly affected by the application. City staff will compare the list of signatures with the list of names on the abstract list to be included in the Administrative packet. CITY OF EACAN LIQUOR LICENSE POLICIES Adopted February 22, 1973 Amended September 21, 1976, December 19, 1979, January 3, 1980, March 4, 1980 and February 3, 1981. aiR OFF -SALE LIQUOR 1) Four off -sale liquor licenses shall be allowed at the present time in the City of Eagan. The City reserves the right to space liquor licenses in geographic commercial areas and not concentrate licenses in a single area. The following locations describe the geographic considerations: a) Two licenses shall be allowed in the general western area of the City (near Cedar Avenue and Highway 13). b) One license shall be allowed in the general northeastern area of the City. c) One license shall be allowed in the general south-central area of the City. 2) Off -sale licenses shall be limited to property zoned Commercial. ON -SALE LIQUOR 1) Number a) A total of twelve (12) on -sale liquor licenses shall be allowed at the present time. . 2) Value -(Note 1) a) No on -sale liquor license shall be allowed for any establishment unless the. investment in the building or portion of the building associated with the liquor license is equal to or greater than $200,000. In the event the on -sale liquor establishment is part of a larger building - containing other uses, the value shall be arrived at by prorating the value of the total building on a square footage basis. Value is to be determined on items considered by the County Assessor to be "real property", as differentiated from fixtures. /�7 3) Food Service (Note 1) G a) All establishments .which hold an "on -sale" liquor license must maintain a ratio of food sales to liquor sales of at least 40-60%. Such establishments shall file with the City at the end of each quarter a verified statement as to the food to liquor sales ratio. Failure to maintain the minimum ratio for any quarter is grounds for the City Council to determine that the license is in violation of the Eagan Liquor Ordinance No. 42 and also is grounds for revocation of the license. b) Food service must consist of a "reasonable" choice of, full meals, and shall not be. limited to "quick service" items such as pizza, sand- wiches, hamburgers, etc. 4) Location (Note 1) a) On -sale liquor licenses shall be limited to commercially or industrially zoned property, under a conditional use permit. 5) Exceptions a) Where the license requests are made for establishments which arean integral part of a motel or hotel of over 60 rooms, or -in which the • value of the building or portion of the building associated with the liquor license exceeds $500,000, special exemption from the limit of twelve (12) total on -sale liquor licenses may be granted.., General These policies shall be reviewed on a yearly basis. Note 1: On -sale establishments existing at the date of incorporation of Eagan as a Village are exempt from these requirements. /0 E • MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM. FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: JANUARY 27, 1986 SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE POLICIES The liquor license policies adopted February 22, 1973, and sub- sequently amended to the form as attached were incorporated into the City Code at the time of the ordinance codification. The following is a cross reference between the policies and the City Code. Policy Off -Sale Liquor 1) Geographic Boundaries 2) Commercial Property On -Sale Liquor 1) Number 2) Value Citv Code Page 113, Subd. 12 (This has been revised and will be modified with the next code update) Covered in zoning chapter - not men- tioned in liquor licensing chapter Page 113, Subd. 11 A restaurant is defined on pages 99-1 and 100 (definition number 17) and 3) Food Service A license may be granted to a res- taurant - Page 112, Subd. 10 4) Location A Hotel is defined on page 100 (definition number 18) and 5) Exceptions (Hotel) Page 113, Subd. 11 A copy of the policies is attached for reference. me know if you desire any additional information. Finan Director/City Clerk EJV/kf �� Please let • Agenda Information February 4, 1986, Page Twenty-eight Memo City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/HARDEE''S RESTAURANT H. Conditional Use Permit for Hardee's Restaurant for a Drive Through Restaurant Facility and Pylon Sign --A conditional use permit for Hardee's Restaurant, to be located on Lot 1, Block 1, First Minnehaha Addition, was given consideration by the City Council at the December 17, 1985 meeting. There was a concern expressed by the City Council that stacking space on Krestwood Lane was not adequate and as a result, the plan should be revised. This item was to be considered at the January 21 meeting, however, after further review by staff it was determined the building did not satisfy setback requirements or contain the proper number of parking spaces. The developer has been asked to again review and revise the plan. A copy of the new plan and the City Planner's explanation is enclosed on pages /1-'/ through /j'Z for your review. For a copy of the original staff report and attachments, the original plan and pylon sign request, refer through 154- . • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve or deny the con- ditional use permit application for Hardee's Restaurant as presented. AI • MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: JANUARY 31, 1986 SUBJECT:' UPDATE ON HARDEE'S RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Hardee's have submitted several site plans for the City to review from the time it was continued at the December 17, 1985 City Council meet.ing. The last site plan had good circulation but could not meet the setbacks required from public right-of-ways. Therefore, the applicants have resubmitted a site plan showing basically the same configuration and layout as the first site plan that was submitted with the exception that the entrance to Hardee's, off of Krestwood, has been shifted from 60' to 100' from the intersection. I hope this will take care of the issue regarding the access point onto Krestwood La. The reason they are back to the original site plan is because shifting or changing the building would eliminate the number of parking stalls re- quired for this facility. The applicants are looking at approximat- ely 125 seats which would require in the neighborhood of 41 - 50 parking spaces. The parking shown should be adequate to handle the Hardee's Restaurant as well as the future facility to the ® south. The original conditions should be attached to the Condition- al Use Permit. Dale C. Runkle attachment 16/ 0 °° IL fL. Woo D ,I -- sem--� EriOF A?( bD ( P777771 S I w a �l I a �N F yon w ( d 1%. e E�IER kCK M77 I 0 01 NN?-? pw4 PAP 4 i ( rr 1- fI101- IKr'Ob P -P NZ N r�DI'4y�p PUGKWC2�P�IV$ X15 IS R l WT Wt PI -Ar►, Fop f'fvlfH 10117' . ll5 l of kT( .�A�f1jlA(i'( ?lii IgS6 �aFr� � � 4 �"' � p I S )fJ3 (Y1 L � .'� 1 � T( f.: YY I' '. t i hrvT�•y,. 1� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT:. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: HARDEES RESTAURANT (STANLEY SCHULTZ) LOCATION: NW; OF SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 26, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 'drive-thru' facility and pylon sign for a proposed Hardee's Restaurant east of Pilot Knob Rd and south of Duckwood Dr. CODE COMPLIANCE/SITE PLANNING: All building and parking setbacks meet City Code requirements. 82 parking stalls are provided • 80@ 10' x 20' and 2 @ 12' x 20'. The drive-thru area provides staking for 6 cars and additional space for another 5 cars along the south side of the building. The site plan indicates a future building pad only to demonstrate the ample size of this parcel, and the possibility of another building. Hardees will have two access points from Krestwood Lane, each being 25' wide and providing entrance/exit service. The drive area between the 20' parking stalls will be 25' and along with the 10' width stalls should provide safe, freely moving vehicular activity. The proposed sign location is approximately 20' from the property lines thus meeting City Code. The sign will be very similar to the approved sign at the Nicols Road Hardees. As with that . sign, a variance is.needed because the total sign area will be 143 S.F. per side due to the 32 S.F. appendage sign. City Code allows 125 S.F. per side. This appendage sign and the main 'Hardees' sign 111 S.F. are pre -manufactured with the next smallest sign being 50 S.F. If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) The sign shall be at least 10' within the property line. 2) A variance shall be granted to allow a maximum 143 S.F. of sign area per side. 3) The sign shall be no taller than 27'. 4) The trash area be enclosed. 5) A landscape plan be submitted for Staff review before issuance �_r 1,r: - 15.E E3 ..p W " -/ a I�IL�II LILLI DP710 a� g� r � boanfior� 4 i Pi�oT r��op R� o o E�?FR fx FFPTFF I'l 3v — HARPir'sHt _� � ^� 20' 181 25' 20,1 ------�---- !���.--- _-Q(.._ z x22,39; 2 25' ZU790' l6' 5 Doi Glp � ti p IL I SZ To'fA� 51AL64 � 10' x 20' L @ IZ x7.0' a I�IL�II LILLI DP710 a� g� r � boanfior� 4 i Pi�oT r��op R� i Hardee's Model 616 road sign is the primary sign used for the main identification of the store. Iris usually installed at 16' to 20' grade clearance. A Breakfast/Drive Thru appendage sign is usually used. See appendage sign sheet. SPECIFICATIONS: SIZE: 7'2314' x 15'5' x 1'2518' AREA: 111.44 sp. It. WEIGHT: 1.025 lbs. ELECTRICAL: LOAD: 1 20 Amp, 120 Voll Circuit; 13.4 Amps Maximum LAMPS: F84T12 CWHO CITY 14 BALLAST: FRANCE 388 D 3 lamp OTY 2 FRANCE 488 D 4 lainp. OTY 2. SWITCH; 1 - 20 Amp (U LI Approved" MODEL 816 SIZE: 5'11/2" x 6'2' 'REA: 31.61 sq. ft. WEIGHT: 390 lbs. ELECTRICAL: - LOAD: 1-15 Ah'? 120 Volt Circuit -9.2 AMP %laximum LAMPS: F60T12C%JH0 Oty. 12 BALLAST: France 653D. 6 Lamp Oty. 2 SWITCH: 1.15 4f.:P0 City. 12 EAporoved • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986,..City Council Meeting Page Twenty-nine L J .10 VARIANCE/WESLEY CONSTRUCTION SUN CLIFF FIFTH ADDITION I. Variance for a Two (2) Foot Sideyard Setback for Wesley Construction, Lot 3, Block 2., Sun Cliff 5th Addition --At the last City Council meeting an application for a two (2) foot side yard variance for Lot 3, Block 2, Sun Cliff 5th Addition fronting on Fox Ridge Road, as requested by Wesley Construction Inc., was continued due to no representation by the appli nt. For a copy of the City Planner's report., refer to pages through /6/ . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance as requested by Wesley Construction Inc. • s 0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIAPCE APPLICANT: WESLEY CONSTRUCTION INC LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 2, SUN CLIFF 5TH ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 21, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 14, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a 2' side yard variance for lot 3, block 2, Sun Cliff 5th Addition, routing on Fox Ridge Rd. COaU-iENTS: The foundation for this house is already completed. 4 2 side yard variance is needed because a "dwelling" area is a;:;vae the garage. The garage itself would have exceeded the C_'tl Code minimum setback of 5'. If the house would have been shifted to the east 21, then that dwelling side would not have iiet code requirements. The proposed setbacks will be 8' on the garage/house side and 11' on the typical dwelling unit side. The front and rear yard setbacks meet code requirements. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. W"*" C/91" FOR: WESLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC. O -h NOTE: — ` - 0 Denotes Wooden Stake Proposed Garage Floor E1.= 913.0 (912.7) Denotes Proposed Finished Ground El. ....*- Denotes Direction Of Surface Drainage Vertical Datum - N.G.V.D. 1929 .� /proincx3¢ n v. p EI Fox RI, C.111. WINDEN 3 ASSOCIATES, INC., LAND SURVEYORS Tal 645.3646 1361 EUSTIS SL, ST. PAUL, MINN. 66100 Scale: 1°=30' e Denotes Iron Monument Bearings Are Assumed G�521r•2nf Ne7° 2'5'45,'E 1911911. i9 t o 1 I Laep. 00 22.5 N n 13.5 N w 1 Proposed �+ , //Ouse 1 /L M M 3!! IAd:15 % 19i tV sea 21' 43" E rA Lot 3, Block 2, SUN CLIFF FIFTH ADDITION, Dakota,County, Minnesota. WE HERESY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRISEO AND OF THE LOCATION OF All BUILDINGS, IF ANY. THEREON, AND All VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Doled thi°� ^ daY d ocit bet •A.O. Ives C. R. WINDEN 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. by .� Wesley Construction,inG Weatherby 944-7092 emR� Wesley Construction, Weatherby 944-7092 40 Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty FISCAL 1985/BUDGETARY ADJUSTMENT A. Fiscal 1985, Budgetary Adjustment --Director of Finance Van Overbeke will have a list of budgetary adjustments ready for distribution as part of the Administrative Agenda on Monday. The total expenditures in the general fund, including the payroll accrual and miscellaneous other expenditures included on the 12-29-85 Operating Statement, will be approximately $5,144,000. This is approximately $22,360 over the approved budget after using the entire $147,540 contingency. The total revenues, as recorded in the 12-29-85 revenue report, are approximately $5,870.,000. Since the budget is $5,121,640 and interest earnings will add about $20,000 when rerecorded there will be a favorable revenue variance of approximately $770,000 for the year. The Director of Finance is recommending that the total budget be increased from $5,121,640 to $5,180,000 by showing a revenue estimate of $58,360 for cable television reimbursement. This would leave an unappropriated balance and a contingency of $36,000 and a favorable revenue variance of approximately $690,000. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny budgetary adjustments as recommended by the Finance Director and City Administrator. Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting. Page Thirty-one PRELIMINARY PLAT/HIGHVIEW ACRES B. Preliminary Plat for a Single Family Home in Hghview Acres for Remick Addition --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission on December 19, 1985 and again on January 28, 1986 to consider applications that were submitted by Mark Remick for a preliminary plat consisting of one lot and containing 1.26 acres. After review by the Planning Commission at the December meeting, there was a question regarding the date and procedure in which the City outlot was acquired and further what the legal procedures would be regarding its sale. During the course of research the applicant proposed a land exchange instead of the outright purchasing of the outlot which became acceptable to both the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and the Advisory Planning Commission. For additional information on the item, refer to the staff report enclosed on pages through /6I the original report, an update eo sisti-ng of a new 'r e Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission's recom- mendation. This report is enclosed on pages through / 7/, '175 ` for your review. -'� I ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for a single family home in Highview Acres, Remick Addition. l63 MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 FROM: JIM STURM DATE: JANUARY 17, 1986 SUBJECT: REMICK ADDITION BACKGROUND: Mr. Mark Remick previously submitted an application requesting a preliminry plat consisting of one lot abutting the north property line of Highview Park. This item was continued until information as to how this City outlot was acquired and the legal procedures regarding its sale could be further researched. In the meantime, the applicant has proposed a land exchange instead of the outright purchasing of this outlot. Staff has reviewed this proposal and the Advisory Parks Commission endorsed it with the recommendations made by the Parks Dept. The City attor.ney's office has reviewed this option also and their conclusion is that no public hearing will be neq,uired for this type of land exchange (see attachments). SITE PLAN: • In exchange for the outlot, the City Park Department is requesting 35' along the eastern portion of the site and 2'5' along the southern property line. The eastern area is r,a,ther low and this area will be filled to give Highview Park a more usable activity area.. An additional 35' slope easement to soften the grading was approved by the applicant. Fill from the foundation excavation will be used in this low area. With the additional 25' to the south„ the 10% parkland dedication will have been met. 0 Staff has asked the. applicant to shift the house north so that there is a 25' minimumsetback to the park property line. This may be included in the conditions of the plat along with the access easement across John Remick's property to the north. This was approved by the applicant. The City Planning, Engineering and Park Departments all endorse this land exchange. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION - JIM STURM, ASST. PLANNER FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: JANUARY 15, 1986 RE: PROPOSED REMICK ADDITION The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Remick Addition at its January 9 meeting. The Commission received an analysis report prepared by department staff concerning this proposed development. The report noted that the house would sit on top of a knoll resulting in a predominant visual consequence and impact upon the park. It was also noted that the parcel's east boundary abutts the park and is in a lowland area which has accumulated debris and at times, water. This area impacts the aesthetics of the park as well as its usability. It is noted that the developer has an interest in acquiring a City outlot of approximately 7,400 sq. ft. for access to this parcel. With this in mind, the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission is recommending that the City consider a "swap" of property. In exchange for the City outlot, the City would receive a parcel of approximately 35' in width along the east property line amounting to approximately 7,400 sq. ft. In addition, the City would require a land dedication amounting to approximately 5,500 sq. ft. along the south property line. This would be approximately 25' in width extending through the length of the plat. Further, Commission is recommending and requesting that the house be moved back an additional 25' from this new proposed south property • line. One final recommendation was also made by the Advisory Commission. This would provide for a slope easement on the east property line in order that the lowland area could be properly filled in and contours matched on the remaining property. In summation, the Advisory Commission is suggesting that a swap in property be made with this proposal for the City outlot and for a land dedication of the south property line.' Finally, that the house be moved back at least 25' from the proposed new south property line. As you are aware, City staff met with Mr. Remick on Monday, January 13, regarding the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendations. At this meeting, the proposal was explained to Mr. Remick who agreed to these recommendations. I have attached Figures 1 & 3 concerning the location of this parcel in relation to the park and the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission's recommendations. I will be available at your Planning Commission meeting scheduled for January 28 to respond to any questions regarding this item. Respectfully /;b'mitt , Director of Parks & Recreation CC: Dale .Runkle, City Planner /65 Tom Hedges, City Administrator HAUGE, EIDE & AELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 80122 _ PAUL H. HAUGE AREA CODE 612 KEVIN W. EIDE - TELEPHONE 494-4224 DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER January 9, 1986 Mr. Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Sale of Outlot 1, Valley View Plateau Plat No. 2 Dear Dale: Pursuant to your request, we have reviewed the statutory requirements for the City in regard to the sale or exchange.of the above-described lot to a Mr. Remick in order to provide access to his property to a public street, which would allow platting thereof and construction thereupon. Minnesota Statutes Sections 471.345 and 412.311 do not preclude a City Council from selling or conveying real estate belonging to the City. Several older Attorney General Opinions indicate that the City need not advertise for bids when selling the property. Minnesota Statute Section 412.211 authorizes the Council of any statutory city to acquire real property as for purposes as the City may require and to hold, manage, control, sell, convey, lease or otherwise dispose of such property as its interests require. This is ample authority for,.the City to dispose of land not held in trust for a specified public use. Apparently, the property in question was acquired by tax forfeiture in 1971 and thus is not being held by the City for park,right-of-way or any other type of easement. Thus, it does not appear necessary that any type of public hearing would be required to determine whether the public's best interest was being served. Our ,office has checked with the Dakota County Recorder's office to determine that this property was conveyed to the City by State Deed document #389410 on September 29, 1971. It appears that the dimensions of the property are 55.29 feet wide by 135.01 feet long. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely yours, MAUGE EIDE 6 KELLER, P.A. David G. Rel r DGK:ras Ah AV 0 - r it I N I a H v IIF IF A c I -El OW vrAr, HIGHVIEW PA • ' CITY OF EAGAN n U SUBJECT:. PRELIMINARY PLAT - REMICK ADDITION APPLICANT: MARK REMICK LOCATION: PART OF NE4 OF SEq OF SECTION 4 EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 12, 1985 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat existing of 1.lot and containing 1.26 acres. ZONING AND LAND USE: Presently the parcel is zoned R-1 residential single district and would allow only a detached single family dwelling. The Comprehensive Guide also designates this parcel as a R-1 single family district with a density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre. In review of this particular property, it is in an area that is developed at a very low density. To the north are existing single family homes. To the south and east is City park property and to the west undeveloped R-1 zoned property. The problem with this particular parcel is that it was created a number of years ago without any good public access being provided to the parcel. Therefore, the biggest concern the City has in creating this lot is to how best to provide public access or a street to this particular lot. _;_booking art the Mmt re ;meighborhood _there are a :number _nf-.streets or portions of streets which have been dedicated as sight -of -way euid have not been constructed at this time. Highridge Terrace :_.is stubbed: -to the :undeveloped property to -.the south and City easement then runs easterly which touches the corner of the plat ander consideration. The other road where a connection may or may not. be at this time is Skyline Drive. Presently, Skyline Drive is platted with a full right-of-way up to the west property line of Oster Addition then City park proPerty has a half right- of-way running along the southerly portion of the park property. The issue is in how _to create an overall circulation in this neighborhood and still try to provide public access to the proposed lot. There are 3 alternatives that are possible: 1) To require the applicant to plat a half right-of-way along the westerly portion of the parcel and dedicate it as public right-of-way in order that, street .connection could be made from Highridge Terrace to Skyline Drive. This would run along the westerly property line of lot 1, Remick Addition. Due tothe. topography and location of .this road engineering, -parks and planning .viewed .th.is..,alternate as not being the most feasible approach. / / p PRELIMINARY PLAT - REMICK ADDITION DECEMBER 19, 1985 • PAGE 2 2) To provide public access it would be necessary to look at the easement dedicated to the City and provide a cul-de-sac •• which then provides public access to the newly created lot. At this particular time this alternative seems to be the most feasible way to provide access to this property. 3) The ultimate design concept to provide overall circulation for the neighborhood is to continue Highridge-Terracedirectly south to Skyline Drive. This would be done at the time the De Losh property would develop and the connection would be made at a future date. ''It appears that the topography location to the properties, this connection makes the most sense to provide at a future date. This would allow the pedestrian circulation from the north to follow this road alignment and then easterly to the park. In reviewing this plat it was not the plat itself but the surround- ing conditions which made this difficult to analyze and provide recommendations. i GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant did not submit any grading plane for Staff review and comment. Staff does not foresee any in- surmountable problems resulting from grading with this development, however Staff cannot be certain without a grading plan to review. The site is quite well drained because it consists -of a -small knoll. Drainage appears to be westerly and easterly from the .high point located :approximately at .the :.center__Df::this -parcel. Because of its. adequate . drainage 'and small. size, 'Staff does not anticipate the need for any storm sewer for this' development. OTILITIES: ,'Sanitary sewer- and watermain are in place within =High Ridge Terrace. .2rhese_.mains, when -extended, have sufficient size, capacity and depth to provide --service to this development. Staff recommends both mains be ,extended southerly to the south end of .High Ridge Terrace and then easterly through the City owned 55' parcel south of lot 1 of Valley View Plateau No. 2. STREETS: This. proposed development has no public access to it. In order for this development to comply with the public access requirement, " Staff recommends the option of construction of a cul-de-sac off of Highridge Terrace. This would be a relatively short cul-de-sac, approximately 160' long. Figure 1 shows the other options that Thew -:Parks Department. feels that the option, street along the park would be detrimental to the Staff considered of _locating the park property. • PRELIMINARY PLAT - REMICK ADDITION DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 3 -High Ridge Terrace is a City street on which the City owned parcel abutts. This development should provide for the extension of " High Ridge Terrace about 30' south and to the north line of parcel 010-77 along with the installation of the short cul-de-sac. RIGHT OF WAY/EASEMENTS: To accomodate the cul-de-sac construction, the City will require about 2400 sq ft of right-of-way dedication from the following: 1) SW corner of lot 9, Highview Acres. .2) NW corner of parcel 010-75. 3) HE corner of parcel 010-77. The above right-of-way will suit a 55' radius for the cul-de-sac centered about at the NW corner of this proposed development. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the City's assessment records, Staff found that this development is 'responsible for trunk area storm sewer assessments. In addition, assessment research indicated the City only assessed approximately 38% of the trunk area water assessment back in 1977. The assessment rate at that time was $380/net acre. The City assessed only $180 for the 1.26 acre parcel. The total assessment should have been $478.80. To correct this situation, Staff recommends that this development be respon- sible for the remaining 62% ($478.80-$180.$478.80) of the trunk =area watermain '.rate in _affect ';at the time . of -Ti-nal platting. ---This would amount -to an additional -obligation of 5737_80 that this parcel has for trunk area watermain assessments. - The obliga- ..tion .of this -development for _trunk., area storm sewer .1B $2,635 (34,886 sq ft x $.048/sq ft).- The final amounts will be based on the areas determined by the final.plat and the amount of right- of-way dedicated and also using the.rates in effect at the time of final platting. /'7/ MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER; ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN SULLIVAN, PARKS PLANNER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1985 SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF REMICK ADDITION Background/Purpose The Planning Commission staff report regarding the Remick Addition references an alternative which places a half R.O.W. along the west 25' of the subject parcel and Highview Park. This alterna- tive, in staff's opinion, is not in the best interest of the park property. Existing Conditions Highview Park is a neighborhood park with a tot lot, hockey rink, tennis court, softball and open play area. A majority of the site is maintained turf grass. Significant vegetation masses exists within the northeast -and southwest portion of the parkland. The topography within the park can be characterized as gently rolling with several large flat areas. The terrain within the potential half R.O.W. is low in the northwest corner of the park with an approximate 10' change in elevation to a 6' high ridg adjacent to Skyline Road. The gradient of slope within this are is approximately -5-15%. Vehicular and pedestrian access to the park is from Skyline Road. The northern one-half of the park service area, does not have direct pedestrian access to the park property. Analysis -The placement' of a road-R.O:W. along the west 23' of Highview Park would change the existing topographic character of that portion of .:_:the --park. The grading .of -.the.. roadbed would go :beyond -the �25' R.O.W. with side slopes extending approximately 50' into the park. ':Typically uniform 3:1 -slopes are not placed into Eagan parks because 'of' the engineered visual consequence and maintenance. A 5:1 slope provides a softer and more complimentary slope within parks and are maintainable. This excessive grading would destroy three 24-30' oaks, several poplars and an established mature sumac stand. This plant mass as indicated within the park system plan provides a buffer to the adjacent residential area, preserves signi-. ficant vegetation and provides a space for passive use for trails and sitting areas.. Recommendation Staff recommends that the -Planning R.O.W. along the western 25' of Lot _,.and with in.Highview Park be ^denied: SS/j J report alternative 1, Block 1, Remick for road Addition • 113 - w Preliminary Plat of: REMICK ADDITION IW1.IY ®rl/IIP LrtirtlrlO.`:: •. fII�VHr1 fYl J APC Minutes r' ' December 19, 1985 is ':�REMICK-ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Hall called the public hearing regarding the preliminary plat request of Mark Remick for a single lot plat consisting of 1.26 acres for a single homestead in the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4. City Planner Runkle described the parcel which was basically a landlocked parcel, lacking access on to any public street, creating difficulties in regard to compliance with the Subdivision Ordinance. Mr. Wayne Cordes appeared on behalf of the applicant indicating that the applicant preferred a simple driveway system, an extension of his father's own driveway, rather than the construction of a public street with a cul-de-sac to this single family home. It was indicated that the applicant's father received water and sewer through an outlot of an adjacent development which was apparently owned by the City due to tax forfeiture. Discussion centered around the possibility of selling the outlot to the Remicks to provide the proper access to a public street. Harrison moved, McCrea seconded the motion to table the application until the next Planning Commission meeting so that staff could further investigate the possibility of sale of the outlot to the applicant. All voted yea. SILVER BELL I - PRELIMINARY PLAT - DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY • Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application for the preliminary plat consisting of a 202,200 square foot office warehouse on 8.3 acres in the southeast quarter of Section 18. City Planner Runkle presented the application. Mr. Bernie Frye and engineer Dave Hansing, were also present to provide information in regard to the -proposal. Mr. Frye indicated that it was understood by the applicant that he would be restricted to a 50/50 office warehouse use due to the parking requirements by the City. Mr. Runkle pointed out that a setback variance was allowed due to the fact that the entire parcel was technically front lot lines with a portion for which the variance was requested being adjacent to excess right-of-way for Highway #13. It was agreed that these conditions created a hardship for which setback variance would be allowed. Wold moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading plan shallindicate the proposed grading on parcel 011-02 along with written permission from this property owner to grade on his property. 2. The final grading plan shall also indicate the necessary retaining wall along the T.H. i/13 right-of-way. 3. All salvaged pipe materials and appurtenances shall remain the property of the City of Eagan and stockpiled as requested by the City. 4. This development shall be responsible for the relocating and reburying ® of the 12 inch trunk watermain in accordance with the approved plans by the City of Eagan. :.p). -. . . . 175. R APC Minutes January 28, 1986 REMICK ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT 'Chairperson McCrea then called the public hearing on the application of Mark Remick for preliminary.plat for one single family home in Highview Acres located in part of the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 4, north of Highview Park and west of Pilot knob Road. Dale Runkle presented the application which had previously been before the Planning Commission and was now before the commission on the basis of a proposed land swap of Outlet 1, Valley View Plateau No. 2 to ft. Remick to provide necessary frontage to a public street in exchange for a dedication of comparable land to the City for park purposes as recommended by the Park Department. Mr. Fred DeLosh, the owner of the land directly south of the parcel to be conveyed to Mr. Remick, appeared and pointed out his concern regarding future street construction to serve his property and the alleged need for a fence between his property and the City Park. Wilkins moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and the transfer of Outlet 1, Valley View Plateau No. 2, subject to the following conditions: 1. Public utilities be brought to this development and if constructed under public contract, the project must be authorized by Council prior to final plat approval. - 2. This development shall be responsible for its obligation for trunk area storm sewer assessments and the correct amount of trunk area watermain assessment. 3. That the plat be in compliance with all other City ordinances. 4. That the owner be responsible for the construction and cost of necessary utilities. 5. That the developer provide the City with an easement for snow storage on Outlet 1. 6. That the applicant be required to obtain additional land from the property to the north to provide the access required under City Code. All voted in favor. Agenda Information Memo • February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-two J • PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING/GREENSBORO PROJECT C. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single Family Lots on 40 Acres and a Rezoning From A to PD for Greensboro/Dave Gabbert --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their December 19, 1985 meeting and upon the continuance was again heard at the January 28, 1986 APC meeting. There were questions raised at. the first public hearing, regarding the future extension of Wescott Hills Drive. The City staff has studied this area and the findings are includ d in the attached memorandum found on pages through The application requesting a rezoning 40 acre of a e agricul ural parcel to an R-1, PD district and a proposed plat entitled Greeensborc, a -re both being recommeded for approval by the Advisory Planning Commission. For additional information on the item, refer to the staff report, copies are enclosed on pages through For a copy of the Parks and Recreation Commission recommend ion for the Greensboro plat refer to a memo enclosed on page For a copy of the minutes of the Advisory Planning Comm ssion meetings concerning the Greensboro Project, refer to page A copy of the January 28, 1986, minutes will be included with th Additional Information on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) 2) Preliminary plat for 90 single family lots entitled Greensboro Addition . i7� • MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD HEFTI, ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER DATE: JANUARY 22, 1986 SUBJECT: ADDENDUM TO GREENSBORO PRELIMINARY PLAT At the December Planning Commission meeting the Commission requested the Engineering Department to review how Wescott Hills Dr could be extended. Staff studied the area with representatives from the Parks and Planning Depts to determine the most feasible exten- sion of Wescott Hills Dr to the south. Staff's recommendation for feasible alignments are shown on the attached sketch. As it turns out, an alignment through the Greensboro Addition is not feasible for the following reasons: 1. Extremely difficult topography 2. Large amount of unassessable frontage 3. Excessive amount of right-of-way acquisition • Instead, it makes more sense to extend Wescott Hills Dr easterly and then southerly or extend Trails End Rd southerly and connect Wescott Hills Dr to Trails End Rd. Either way, Mr Griffin, the owner of parcel 011-08, will have public access to his property. The Engineering Dept will be `forwarding these feasible alignments to the school district so that they are aware of the necessary future street extension in this area. CC: Dave Gabbert, Developer Paul Griffin Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation enclosure LK It fc \ r T— q 3. sit opt , ;AN I, "t ' �IV�.�!-r.-'-J� IL" >� � . j•^.��,: \i.' �,�—�-��"( (1 G \ I (`I����11n1111111 �� l�lt4;l�, .a r �r 1 iI IIA I - e _ p".�5- \ ! ` ..� �Ijl�% �✓ 1 r ��\\ \\\ \ . Yt r J�,] y r ;?t j � `„ Y t{r � v t' �i="�:-3e � �i.' I+•' �1 ��: � O_ = r. � � _ .� .;�, I� II � = �� . -�_ 1 \�C' \`� ` r _ } ��i� � � - J -I l+�Y ii• .� f �v � �� L�� 1 cly �c�/! � 17Fi�1,� l-- i ""� �\ 1, i YW f { ti �,. �;] kI� ♦Eeh a n �' '\�,�\\ 1/ f v {�/(-./ IIY. � Ila � /.v1 -_ \\ c- - <• ) Z _\\ \\� II J/ 1(�(ly/� J \ r;nd Rd `'ic--... - I n xnulnlll�OwlnwWl��u(n(ulplPuulluununl�l UP wl- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT:. REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - APPLICANT: DAVE GABBERT LOCATION: SWa OF SECTION 14 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 19, 1985 DATE OF REPORT: DECEMBER 9, 1985 REPORTED BY: ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a rezoning of a 40 acre A (agricultural) parcel to a R-1 P.D. (Planned Development) district. This site is located directly south of Carriage Hills Golf Course and abutts Wescott Road. The P.D. is required because there are lots under the 12,000 sq ft minimum as designated by City Code. ® ZONING AND LAND USE: The subject parcel has a Comprehensive Plan designation of R-2, 3-6 dwelling units per acre. The proposed plat , all R-1 will have a density of 2.16 units/gross acre or 2.49 units/net acre, both of which are below the R-2 density allowance. Adjacent land uses are: PF (golf course) to the north, P.D. (single family) to the south and northwest and A to the southwest and east (the proposed Wescott Elementary School site). SITE PLANNING/CODE COMPLIANCE: The submitted site plan indicates 8.7 total lots, 51 of which meet the Code requirement of an 85' front yard width at the setback line., .The remaining 36 have lot widths ranging between 75' - 82' at' the setback line. Lot sizes also vary with this being the breakdown: 50 lots +12,000 sq ft, 15 @ 11-12,000 s.f., 12 @ 10-11,000 .s.f., and 10 @.9-10,000 s.f. with the smallest at 9,520 s.f. The smaller lots are generally where there are less natural amenity features such as the interior portion of the site and along the eastern border that abutts the school property. The site is one of numerous knolls and depressions. Mature vegetation is scattered but most heavy around the low lying areas. Access to the site is from a loop road that connects to Wescott Road. An additional road will bisect the site from the S.W. to the N.E. lots abutting this street will be parallel to the ® Williams Pipeline Easement and will require front yard setback variances. A proposed cul-de-sac will extend to the N.W. from this road serving 4 lots. It was Staff's recommendation that 79 REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 • PAGE 2 stubs for utilities be placed to the west and north should Carriage Hills Golf Course change use in the future. The development of this project will take place in 2 years. Year one will include the loop road from the west entry (from Wescott) to approximately lot 21. The second year will see the continuation of the loop road to Wescott Road, the secondary road and 2 cul-de-sacs. COMMENTS: A trail is planned in the Wescott Road right-of-way at the time of street improvements. Staff has been working on providing trail/vehicular connections between Lexington Place South, the subject plat and the proposed school site. It is our recommendation that a pedestrian connection through the outlot in Lexington Place South and the proposed plat between lots 12 and 13 of block 1 be provided. Also, the possibility of placing an 8' trail in the pipeline easement from the loop road to the schocl property be further researched. Staff will provide addit_onal sketch plans for review at the December 19 APC meeting. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed grading for this development appears feasible from an engineering standpoint. However, due to the rolling nature of this site, this grading plan does not propose to fill several small depressions. This is fine as long is as the developer constructs storm sewer outlets from these depressions to prevent future flooding. This development is located in major drainage district J as shown on. figure #1. As you can see from the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan, the northeas'C corner of this development includes a portion of Pond JP -32. This pond presently has no storm sewer outlet. The Comprehensive Plan allows for two alternatives for constructing an outlec to this pond. One alternative is through a series of ponds to the north and east and eventually to Pond JP -12 from which the storm water would be pumped into Pond JP -19. The other alternative is to construct a 12" gravity line from Pond JP -32 to the south and connect to the trunk storm sewer presently under contract with the Lexington Square Development. Staff recommends the second alternative with the 12" line to the south because it will eliminate some additional water to be pumped from .lift station 15 thereby reducing future maintenance costs and capital costs for pump oversizing. Staff further recommends this development provide for outlets to several natural depressions within this development described as follows and illustrated on figure 2: 1) The 900 contour on lots 10 and 11 of block 1. 2) The 899 contour immediately west of lot 8 located within the Lexington Place South Addition. 3) The 880 contour located within block 3, south of the pipeline easement and north of Wescott Road. REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO ® DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 3 Erosion control shall be .provided on the final detail agreement plan in accordance with the City's Erosion. Control Manual. This development will have to revise the street grades to provide for a 2% slope for 100 feet from all intersections with the exception of the cul -de -.sac in block 3. Staff can accept the proposed grades on this cul-de-sac for the following reasons: 1) -The small amount of traffic. 2) Conforming to the City Code would require additional fill over and above what the developer is proposing within the Williams Brothers pipeline easement. The developer will have to obtain permission from Williams Brothers Pipeline Company to fill over the pipeline within the pipeline easement. UTILITIES: Presently there are no City utilities in place to provide services to the proposed development. However, City ® Project 433 provides for trunk storm and sanitary sewer to the southeast corner of this development. Staff anticipates this project to be under construction early next spring with completion by mid to late summer. The closest watermain is at the intersection of Wescott Road and Lexington Avenue. City Project 450 provides for extension of the trunk watermain to the east line of the Williams and La Rue Addition leaving it approximately 100 feet west of this develop- ment. This developer proposes on installing all utilities and streets under public contract. Therefore, prior to final plat approval the Council must authorize the improvements to extend watermain along Wescott Road to this site and also extend the trunk sanitary and trunk storm sewer through this site as the Comprehensive Storm and Sanitary Sewer Plans propose. STREETS: This entire development is bordered on the south by Wescott Road. Wescott Road is presently a 20 foot gravel surface rural section roadway. This developer and the Lexington Square Development have petitioned for the upgrading of Wescott Road to City collector street status. Council approval for upgrading of Wescott Road should also occur prior to final plat approval of this development. The proposed street layout for this development is acceptable • with the exception of the cul-de-sac in block 2. Because there is no topographic hardship or. difficulties in accessibility to the area it serves, in contrast to the southerly cul-de-sac, Staff recommends the elimination of this cul-de-sac and continuing this street northwesterly through lot 8 of block 2. V REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 • PAGE 4 RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff has no problems with the proposed right-of-way dedications. However, Staff recommends the right-of- way'for,,the cul-de-sac to be modified slightly where the radius meets the tangent portion. This is relatively minor and can be worked out with the developer during the final plat preparation. Also, the proposed 50 foot half right-of-way dedication for Wescott Road is in accordance with City Code for a collector street right- of-way width. The City should require this development to dedicate the following utility easements: 1) The westerly 15 feet of lots 9 and 10, block 1 for storm sewer. 2) A 15 foot utility easement centered over lots 7 and 8, block 1 for storm sewer. 3) A 30 foot easement within lot 24, block 1 for sanitary sewer (location to be based on design). 4) A ponding easement encompassing the 888.1 high water elevation for Pond JP -32. 5.), .A ponding easement encompassing the 881 elevation for the depression located within block 3. 6) A 15 foot easement over lots 15 and 16, block 2 and lots 21 and 22, block 1 for storm sewer. 7). A 15 foot easement located across the common lot lines of lots 1, 2 and 29 of block 2 for storm sewer. This development shall dedicate all additional easements as per City ,Code ;requirements. TRAILWAYS. Because Wescott Road is designated a minor arterial roadway it requires a 5' sidewalk along the north side of it. This sidewalk will be this development's responsibility. In addition, the Park Department is looking to provide trailway access from the Lexington Place South development adjacent the westerly boundary of this development to the future park property located east of this development. As of this report, the location is unknown but this development will be responsible for providing the necessary easements and the financial obligations for the construction of this trailway when the Park Department determines the actual location. - �0 v REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO • DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 5 ASSESSMENTS: The Cityassessment records indicate that no trunk area water, sanitary sewer, or storm sewer assessments have been levied over this parcel. Trunk sanitary sewer assessments are pending under Project 433. Project 433 provides for the installa- tion of trunk sanitary and storm sewer through the Lexington Square Addition to its northeast corner. Because this develop- ment will have to petition for the installation of public streets and utilities, it would be appropriate to include the trunk area watermain and storm sewer assessments with that particular project. Council authorization of the necessary improvements to this develop- ment will be necessary before this development can receive final plat approval. n • REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT - GREENSBORO DECEMBER 19, 1985 PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1) Council shall authorize the necessary public improvement projects to provide streets and utilities for this development prior to final plat approval. 2) This development shall obtain an easement or authorization from Williams Brothers Pipeline to perform grading activities within the Williams Brothers easement. 3) The drainage plan shall incorporate storm water outlets for depressions located on lots 10 and 11, block 1; west of lot '8; and within block 3, all is noted within the Engineering Report. 4) All street grades at intersections shall meet City Code with the exception of the southerly cul-de-sac. 5) The northerly cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and the street extended to connect to the looped street. 6) The Council shall approve the upgrading of Wescott Road prior to final plat approval. 0 7) The developer shall provide for a trailway as appropriate • from Lexington Place South to the proposed school site east of this development. 8) The developer shall dedicate a 50 foot half right-of-way for Wescott Road, the street looping onto Wescott Road shall be a minimum of 60 foot right-of-way with the other interior streets minimum of 50 foot right-of-way. 9') The developer shall dedicate the following easements: A. The westerly 15' of lots 9 and 10, block 1 for storm sewer. B. A 15' utility easement centered over lots 7 and 8, block 1 for storm sewer. C. A 30' easement within lot 24, block 1 for sanitary sewer with final location being based on final design. D. A ponding easement encompassing the 888.1 high water elevation for pond JP -3'2. E. A ponding easement encompassing the 881 elevation for the depression located within block 3. F. A 15' easement over lots 15 and 16, block 2 and lots 21 and 22, block 1 for storm sewer. G. A 15' easement located across the common lot lines of lots 1, 2, and 29 of block 2 for storm sewer. 10) This development shall be responsible for the installation • of a 5' concrete walk along Wescott Road. %F� 9 U • %o AL V1MA -�ORIE. 'R04R �'." OIEiflV VIflR a� CPNA/ILF i_ SOUW( ' e i om w 4 1 �,GG= LLGf jAy rou.asc GYL—u JL ---------- - ff t IKI W � B -YE /a a ,oma` Tl u)"' :� sr.•%cwEKT w�wncRGsr lr e�a•k•� i rCc a0 %o 0 61 GREENSBORO Il 1DP-20 C)P�9 Er.;i7 901.0 TOL 880.0o 52� 3, C ()P -i 893 E16 RXII 6 82 2 --A�-l WESCOIT U, D, 191.06 D-- 84 CARRIAGE 12" HILLS CO�F F -h ARIE /11-14 DP= 8330 8921 �'8540 .8730 JP -I6 2' ---IDP-25 I :t�CN 1882.0 -33 88,194,,7 'Sp; I 8121.1 O�4 �3, ip 89 0 '�- 8320 87,m 1Z JP 5-9 "5495 C-677 --�rP--6*5-, -7P -,4 r 1.0 2�3 P� 868.7 -- 8640 15 ....... -�p 412 8 7.9 7 ;'-bCOTT I J8P;,602 117.1 r Bj7 :1�� 8881 17 �ATrrlp� JP -15 1 -j ;a6953 .4 JBP; P20 -10 - 92, 7 3. L.S. -I jP 41 826. 846.5 12 88853 .... 87.0 -63 R E; -- ie L'Sr1 JP 8997 AbCITpN CIT --90 JP -31 JP 11 876,3 815.7 .39 44-- jP I ip 880.4 8840 Sel 830.0 89, ..7 8950 57 1r 1'Tr LR J'b ..... . C J JP -19 30 05. -41-- m;: JP -58d 8740 r= 8775 882.0 IZ:,Z j 4, J -P 820.8 73D /S-30 10 130.0 8 4 DO 879, SQUARE 85 20 --j I J- JP -20•• N, 856.6 `-�;JP-4JP-21 9 LS -17 810 1 830.0 81 5.3 P-9 840.0 2. 8:io-.�- -36' m TN. 7 ff�24�ATCH. L7' ',RK J d 2 d wil 7") nF PARJ C A 889.0 • JP -.0 JP -22 'AGA 89 9 86�.0 820.7 :77 5 1. 1 88 .4 840.0-- i2riloss PARA JP -29 9260 JP -F27- 855 0 2E 9450 . - 60 �i904.0 2W.0 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. approved: plate plate #: MEM07�T0=TOM=HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR • iOROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS &RECREATION ��"" DATE: JANUARY 15, 1986 BE: PROPOSED PRELIMARY PLAT - GREENSBORO - DAVE GABBERT The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat entitled "Greensboro Addition" at its January 9 Commission meeting. There was considerable discussion by the Commission concerning trail routing through the plat and a desire to incorporate a trail route which would best facilitate walkers from the residential area. to the school property. It was noted that walkers could be accomodated from this development as well as a through connection to the Lexington Place South development immediately adjacent and west of this plat. With this background, the Advisory Commission made the following recommendations as condition of plat approval: 1. That the developer provide a cash dedication requirement. 2. A bituminous trailway connection to the Lexington Place South development to the west be made. 3. A trail connection to the school to the east with placement of which should be worked out with the school district and City staff. isCommission also requested that should there be significant changes in this preliminary plat, noting that it had not yet received Planning Commission's recommendations for approval, that the plat be returned to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission for final review and recommendations. r\ U KV/js CC: Julie Dykstra - Planning Aide Ed Kirscht - Engineering Technician APC Minutes December 19, 1985 • -GRBENSBORO.- PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing on the application of Dave Gabbert for rezoning and preliminary plat of a 40 acre Agriculture parcel to R-1 PD, located south of Carriage Hills Golf Course adjacent to Wescott Road in the southwest quarter of Section 14. City Planner Runkleindicatedthat the Comprehensive Guide designated the property as R-2 with a density of 3 to 6 units per acre. The applicant was proposing a 87 single family lots of which 36 lots would be under 12,000 square feet, which was the reason for the request for R-1 PD zoning. Mr. Gabbert was present to indicate the reasons for small lots and the cul-de-sac. Mr. Paul Griffin, a neighbor, appeared indicating that there was a need for access to his and other property and the future extension of Wescott Hills Drive: It was pointed out that the parcel directly east of this parcel had been purchased by Independent School District #196 and the City of Eagan for the school site and park site. Assistant City Engineer Hefti indicatea that indeed there was a need to extend a major street through this area and that staff needed to review what options were available. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to postpone the matter for .30 days • to allow staff to determine where access would be allowed for future street improvements. All members voted yes. C� ® Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986,.City Council Meeting Page Thirty-three • WAIVER OF PLAT/LOT 7, BLOCK 1, SUN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION D. Waiver of Plat (Pietsch Construction) Duplex Lot Split, Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1st Addition --A waiver of plat application was submitted 'by Pietsch Construction to split the duplex lot on Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1st Addition. The Sun Cliff lst _.- Addition consists of 191 single-family lots and 43 duplex lots, a total of 277 dwelling units. The subject lot is 10,625 and is on the NW side of Sunrise Road. This lot will be split into two separate parcels, each measuring 42.50' X 1251. The existing lot has separated utilities and this lot split will not effect the service in any way. A map is enclosed on pageZq/for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat (Pietsch Construction) for a duplex lot split, Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1st Addition. 4OR: PIETSCH CONSTRUCTION / If C. R. WINDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. BAND SURVEYORS TSL 645.3646 1361 EUSTIS ST." ST. PAUL, MINN. 66106 That Bart of Lot 7, Block 1, Sun Cliff First Addition, Dakota Countv, Minnesota lvinq southwesterly of the Northeasterlv 42.50 feet thereof. WE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND ABOVE DESCRIBED AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS, IF ANY, THEREON, AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS, IF ANY, FROM OR ON SAID LAND. Doted thi.146day of October A.D. 1985 .::House .Locafed..Dec ./6,19,95 . C. R./JW IIINDEN8 ASSOCIATES, INC. by Sur.oyor, Minnesota Registration No.-7-772� • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-four .ADDITIONAL.ITEMS MINNESOTA CITY LEGISLATIVE POLICIES A. Review of League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies --The 1986 proposed city policies and priorities for the League of Minnesota Cities was distributed several days ago to each member of the City Council. The 1986 Legislative Conference will be held on Wednesday, February 5, at the St. Paul Radisson Hotel in St. Paul. Traditionally, City Councilmembers have reviewed the legislative format and if there are any concerns or considera- tions that any member would like to discuss and ask that the City's representative submit a change at the conference on Wednesday, these items should be discussed at Tuesday's City Council meeting. It is not suggested that each item be reviewed; however, certain items that do raise a concern for any member of the City Council should be discussed and: a position will be st if there is a majority consensus on that particular ._ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To address the 1986 proposed • City Policies and Priorities as drafted by the League of Minnesota Cities and present any changes at the legislative conference on Wednesday, February 5, 1986. I\ L Special Note: Mayor Blomquist, City Councilmember Smith and City Administrator Hedges are registered for this one -day confer— ence. • Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-five REVIEW/APPROVE SPECIAL ASSMT. CMTE. RECOMMENDATIONS B. Review/Approve Special Assessment Committee Recommendations --On January 16, 1986, the Special Assessment Committee met to review several requests of property owners who requested special considera- tion pertaining to their final assessments associated with projects recently completed or their pending assessments associated with projects under construction to be final assessed at a later date. Enclosed on pages / Z through / 3-F is a copy of the minutes of that Special Assessment Commi LEe meeting discussing each item and their proposed recommendations. Of the 11 requests received from property owners, the first five dealt with pending assessments where the projects have not been completed or the final assessment hearings initiated. The final six property owners dealt with appeals resulting from final assessment hearings held on September 17. Of those final six, four were addressed under the public hearing items of this agenda and two (Patrick McCarth been continued to a later date due to continuation assessment Committee recommendations. As a part of the Committee's review of these requests for special • consideration, a new special assessment policy pertainin to sidewalk/trailway assessments (enclosed on pages /rj(Z and /) ;i has been prepared, reviewed by the Committee and is eing forwarded to the Council with a recommendation for formal adoption. e3 i� :o. As a result of the Committee's discussion regarding assessments resulting from collector/arterial street improvements, a formal special assessment policy is being prepared for consideration by a Council action to be distributed with the Administrative packet for the February 4 meeting. The last item of consideration by the Committee pertained to creating a new assessment classification for large undeveloped regional type parklands. This formal policy statement will also be distributed with the Administrative packet for formal consideration at the February 4 meeting. Enclosed -on pages /Cj� through 2.1E is the introductory -items associated with eac of the issue is by the Special Assessment Committee resulting_ in their recommendations contained in the previously referenced minutes. You will note that none of the supporting background information has been included in an effort to conserve on the volume of information distributed with this Council agenda packet. However, if any Councilmember wishes to have this information provided prior to the Council meeting, it can be distributed with the Administrative agenda • if so requestd. _ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify the recommendations of the .Special Assessment Committee meeting of January 16, .1986, and, if approved, authorize staff to make appropriate adjustments in the proposed assessments to the affected parcels. /193 • MINUTES OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA JANUARY 16, 1985 A regular meeting of the Special Assessment Committee was held at the Eagan Municipal Center at 4:30 p.m. on January 16, 1986. Those present were Chairman Don Knight, Members Dale Vogt and Bill Rydrich, Mayor Bea Blomquist and Councilman Tom Egan. Absent was member Garrett Mulrooney. Also present were Public Works Director Tom Colbert and City Attorney Paul Hauge. AGENDA Vogt moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the Agenda as presented. A11 voted yes. FRANCIS C. FRANZ a ANNA S. HEUER PROPERTY - PROJECT #372 Tom Colbert described the concerns of the property owners consisting of Francis C. Franz and Anna S. Heuer on the south side of Deerwood Drive, objecting to proposed assessments associated with the recent completion of ® Deerwood Drive from Riverton Avenue to the east side of I -35E. The upgrading was performed under Project #372 by MnDOT through a Cost Participation Agreement with the City, with the majority of the costs paid by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and a portion paid by the City. The Assessment Committee at its meeting in October 1985.received the objections and requestea further information from the staff. The configuration, topography and setback restrictions were considered to be unique to the parcel, noting that the westerly parcel on the south side of Deerwooa Drive and the easterly parcel on. the north side of Deerwooa Drive, owned by Francis Franz should, according to Mr. Colbert's recommendation, receive credits toward the proposed assessments for lateral purposes and recommended a 300 foot reduction on the easterly parcel and 100 feet along the westerly parcel. In addition„ there was discussion concerning proposed Sidewalk Trailway Policy #86-1 submitted by the staff. Member Ryarich questioned whether it would be permissible to assess a residential equivalent on Deerwood Drive if there is no direct access allowed. There was discussion concerning the 1978 Major Street Policy and also Mr. Colbert reviewed the Johnny Cake Ridge Road project commenced in 1976. It appeared that the Johnny Cake Ridge project was similar to the Deerwood Drive improvements and indicated that 50% of the Johnny Cake Ridge Road project was paid by the State and 50% from MSAS funds, with no assessments to adjacent property owners, with the understanding that all easements would be granted by the affected property owners. 1 • Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 It was noted further that there was uncertainty as to development of the adjoining land on Deerwood and that it was assumed that access would be restricted with direct driveways prohibited. Attorney Pat Farrell appeared on behalf of Mr. Franz and stated that because of the residual configuration of the various parcels of the Franz property, that it may be impractical to levy assessments, claiming there were no benefits against the property for sidewalk and street purposes. He argued there were no reasonable benefits to the property, and further, that the majority of the funds were federal funds used to install improvements with a small amount of City funding. It was also indicated that Mr. Franz has built a single family home on the property and therefore some benefit resulted. It was suggested that there would possibly be a benefit from the assessments for the single family home, and further, that sidewalks could be assessed depending upon the future use of the property. A representative of Mrs. Heuer was present and stated that the Heuer property is vacant and undeveloped. There was further discussion concerning proposed assessment for street and sidewalk purposes on all benefited properties on both the north and south side of Deerwood Drive. Egan then moved, Blomquist seconded the motion to recommend assessing the Francis Franz property for single family use only, with future assessments against the property based upon future uses including the sidewalk and trailway which would comply with the assessment policy at the time of future development; • further, that the staff be directed to prepare a policy implementing the proposed recommendations of the Committee. All voted in favor. SIDEWALK AND TRAILWAY POLICY - Rydrich moved, Egan seconded the motion to recommend adoption of the Trailway and Sidewalk Policy 4186-1 submitted by the staff and recommend that the City Council approve it. All membersvoted yes. WILLARD BERFELZ - PROJECT 41447 - LONE OAK ADDITION On August 6,. 1985, a" public hearing was held for the installation of trunk watermain along Highway 41149 from Yankee Doodle Road to Trunk Highway 4155. It was noted the Berfelz property is used as a single family residence but is zoned Light Industrial. Mr. Colbert recommended to the Committee that conditioned upon the owner executing an agreement for Special Assessment Policy 4182-2, the staff recommended the rate be reduced to an Agricultural - Single Family rate and in addition, that the assessable footage be reduced to 135 feet for Lot 12, Auditor's Subdivision No. 38. Mr. and Mrs. Berfelz were present and stated that they also own Parcel 010-28 and Colbert stated that the same recommendation would apply to that parcel, with the understanding that both parcels are classified as homestead by the County Assessor. Mr. and Mrs. Berfelz had no objection to the proposed recommendation and upon motion • by Egan, seconded Vogt,.it was recommended to the City Council that the staff -recommendation be adopted, including Parcel 010-28 and in the event that the property has been previously assessed for the same improvements, that no - assessment be levied by the City. Council. Staff was requested to investigate the statement of Mr. Berfelz that the,property had been assessed for the same. purpose at an earlier time. All voted yes. ig3 h • • Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 DON SANDBERG - PROJECT #427 - YANKEE DOODLE ROAD The next request for reconsideration of proposed assessments came from Don Sandberg, property owner on the south side of Yankee Doodle Road. The improvement provides for the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road from a present. rural ditch section to a four lane road with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities. Mr. Sandberg's property contains 390 feet of frontage with a single family homestead. A 7.5 acre parcel is hampered by a protective wetland incorporated in the middle one-third of his property and Mr. Colbert recommended that the property be assessed for a comparable single family residential frontage according to City policy under the following conditions: 1. That the parcel be unplatted. 2. That the parcel shall have a net area of 3 acres, excluding all public and dedicated right-of-way ponding easements. 3. That the parcel have a minimum 200 foot frontage on the public right- of-way where the connection is being made. Mr. Sandberg's property qualified, and therefore it was recommended that the assessment be reduced to a comparable single family frontage of 100 feet and that the additional assessments associated with the remaining frontage be assessed at the time of the rezoning of the development of any part or all of the balance of the property. Mr. Sandberg was present and had no objections to the recommendation. Egan moved, Vogt. seconded the motion to recommend approval of the staff recommendation and forward .it to the City Council. All members voted affirmatively. YD ASSOCIATES - PROJECT X1427 - YANKEE DOODLE ROAD The Committee then considered a request of YD Associates under Project #427 regarding street and storm sewer improvements on Yankee Doodle Road to review the proposed assessments against the property. Mr. Colbert discussed the proposed assessments and Vance Grannis, Sr. appeared on behalf of the owners, objecting to the proposed assessments. He indicated that there was not adequate benefit, from the improvements, to justify the assessments. Mr. Colbert pointed out that there is a hazardous intersection at Coachman Road, there is lack of ability for through -traffic and the upgrading of the street will improve the value of the adjacent property. No 'specific action was taken, noting that the assessments will not be levied until 1987 and Mr. Grannis indicated that an appraisal will be submitted within the next few months, to the City. /P(1, 3 • Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 PATRICK McCARTHY - PROJECT #404 - LEXINGTON AVENUE TRUNK WATER MAIN PROJECT #411 - BIRCH PARK ADD TRUNK STORM SEWER The objections of Patrick McCarthy were next brought to the assessment committee pertaining to the assessments associated with the trunk water main along Lexington Avenue. Mr. Colbert reviewed with the committee members the projected assessments. and stated that a letter from Arnold Kempe, the attorney for the owner, requesting a continuance, had been submitted to his office. After discussion, Vogt moved, Egan seconded the motion to continue consideration of the objections, including Project #411, Birch Park Addition trunk storm sewer, until the next meeting of the assessment committee, noting that the applicant was not present. All members voted yea. DON VOGTMAN - PROJECT #411 - SKOVDALE The objections of Don Vogtman to the proposed trunk storm sewer assessments under Project #411 consisting of the Birch Park Addition/Patrick Eagan Park area were brought to the committee by Mr. Colbert. The Public Works Director detailed the City's position and recommended that due to the recent fill placed on the property eliminating the previous low drainage basin and redirecting the drainage flow that the storm sewer system serviced by Project #411, it's the staff's recommendation that the property be determined benefited by the improvement and that the assessment as proposed be reaffirmed. Don Vogtman was present and read a statement in opposition, ® including the fact that his land should be treated similar to the adjacent lots which receive about 56% credit, based upon the large -lot allowance. He stated that his lana is serving as a temporary ponding area and it is fairly heavily wooded, offering absorption qualities, and further that the benefit is . not in proportion to the proposed assessments. Committee members noted that the 75 foot frontage at present will be reduced at the time of Pilot Knob Road widening, with the balance of about 60 feet for access from Deerwooa Drive to the northerly portion. Noting that Mr:. Vogtman's_property includes Lot 7 and the north half of Lot 6,Block 1, Skovdale, and that access to it for development would come from Deerwooa Drive, Blomquist moved, Egan seconded the motion to recommend to the City Council that it allow.a large -lot policy credit for the two lots, because of the fact that the parcels are platted, the fact that the other lots within Skovaale have received the large -lot .credit, that all of Skovdale Addition was platted at one time and it would penalize the Vogtman property if it was not permitted; but in the event that the two parcels are divided into more than two single family lots, that the Council then may reconsider the assessments and increase the amount of the trunk storm sewer assessments at that time. All members voted yes. /93 d 4 40 Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 VICTOR STAFF - PROJECT #411 - SKOVDALE 2ND ADDITION The next objection brought before the Committee consisted of those from Mr. and Mrs. Victor Staff covering Lot 5, 'Block 1, SkovaaLe 2nd Addition, under Project #411, Birch Park Aadition/Patrick Eagan Park trunk storm sewer. At the September 19, 1985 final assessment hearing before the City Council, Darrel Baska, the attorney for Mr. and Mrs. Staff, submitted a written Notice of Appeal and objected to the assessments. Mr. Baska was present and indicated that the level of the adjacent pond had increased and caused a portion of the Staff property to be lost and that an action has been commenced against the City for inverse condemnation. Negotiations have taken place for settlement of the action. Mr. Colbert noted that the staff had recommended a deduct for the area covered by water, and had adopted the large -lot formula with the balance of the lot assessed for storm sewer purposes. It was proposed the assessment be based on the area above the easement level of 830 feet. Egan moved, Blomquist seconded the motion to recommend to the City Council that it levy assessments. for storm sewer purposes above the 830 footlevel, including dedication of the easement from the Staffs and an acceptable settlement of the inverse condemnation action brought against the City. All voted yes. RONALD BOYLE - PROJECT X1411 - BIRCH PARK ADDITION ® The objections from Mr. and Mrs. Ronald. Boyle of Deerwood Drive to storm sewer assessments against their property were next considered by the Committee. Mr. Colbert reviewed the objections and noted that they were comparable to the Bergin, Caponi and Rooney objections, all of whose property drains into JP -8. He stated that JP -8 does not have an outlet at the present time, but that the rise in the level of the pond will require interconnections within a very short period of time. Blomquist moved, Egan seconded the motion to recommend approval of the staff's recommendation that the assessment against the parcel be deferred until the property is directly benefited due to the installation of outlets in Pond JP -8. All voted yes. LILLIAN McCARTHY - PROJECT X1411 BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK TRUNK STORM SEWER Mr. Colbert then brought before the Committee the objections of LiLlian McCarthy, an owner on Lexington Avenue objecting to the trunk storm sewer assessments under Project X1411. The parcel incorporates 3.91 acres with only 1.5 acres assessed at the Agricultural/Single Family rate, due to the large - lot credit proposed to be assessed against the property. There was no appearance on behalf of Ms. McCarthy. After discussion, Egan moved, Vogt seconded the motion to recommend that the proposed assessments with large -lot credit against the Lillian McCarthy property be approved by the City Council. All voted in favor. • C Assessment Committee Minutes January 16, 1986 PARKLAND - SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY - HOLLAND LAKE AREA A memorandum prepared by Tom Colbert was discussed by the members dated January 16, 1986 regarding proposed assessments for storm sewer improvements in the Holland Lake/Cliff Road area. He stated the estimated cost of the major storm sewer project is approximately $900,.000.00, but that a large portion of the acreage, approximately 429 acres, consisting of County Park, would result in a proposed assessment of approximately $300,000.00 at the Agricultural/Single Family Residential rate. Preliminary discussion has been held with Dakota County representatives, indicating that they do not have the resources available to finance the estimated $300,000.00 ana because of the need to negotiate the assessments, there was concern by Committee members that the City should continue to negotiate for contribution from the County. There were also questions about improvements that would unaoubtealy be installed in the park, including park buildings, parking lots, etc. which would add to the storm sewer runoff. The Committee recommended an Ordinance be prepared to control the construction of improvements on public property without City approval. Egan moved, Vogt seconded the motion that the Committee be on record recommending to the City Council that it adopt a policy providing for one-half residential equivalent assessments against the County Park property for trunk storm sewer improvements, with the understanding that the City can impose restrictions on development, and in the event that future development of the park property takes place, that additional trunk storm sewer assessments could be levied against the benefited property. All members voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Upon motion duly made and seconded, All votea yes. 1�3-F 6 the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. PHH SAC 1/16/86 6r ZUlAL- A`.ibZbbM POLICY Sidewalk/Trailway Assessment SUBJECT: Assessments for the installation of concrete and/or bituminous trailways and sidewalks. POLICY: Sidewalks and trailways shall be installed in accordance with the City of Eagan 's master street and trailway plan which also incorporates related County and State installations. At the time of Council adoption of a project, through the public hearing process, sidewalks and trailways shall be assessed at the City's rate in effect at the time of the public hearing against all properties zoned Multiple Residential (R-3), Commercial, Institutional or Public Facility (P.F.). For purposes of this policy, land use guide plans and planned unit developments (P.U.D.) shall not be considered as existing zoning at the time of the public hearing. Properties zoned agricultural (Ag), single family (R-1) or duplex (R-2) shall not be assessed for any costs associated with • the installation of sidewalks or trailways. If applicable, properties that are subsequently rezoned at a later date to a higher qualifying zoning classification shall be assessed at the rates in effect at the time of the rezoning as a condition of development approval in accordance with policy #82-1. • OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this policy is to require higher density residential developments, commercial property, public facilities. and institutions to participate in the cost of the installation of sidewalks and trailways which are necessary due to the pedestrian traffic generated and/or' benefitted by these off-street improvements. JUSTIFICATION: Due to the fact that agricultural zoned property does not generate pedestrian traffic and taking into consideration the fact that single family (R-1) and duplex lots (R-2) are not allowed frontage on collector and arterial streets where sidewalks and trailways are constructed, the benefit associated with the related sidewalks and trailways are minimized accordingly. However, multiple ��7 SAC 1/16/86 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY NUMBER 86-1 ® PAGE 2 residential, commercial, institutional and public facilities generate the need for off-street pedestrian access. They should be assessed the related costs associated with their appropriate zoning. Reviewed and acted upon by: CITY COUNCIL: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE: Approved Date _Approved -//, Date Denied Date Denied Date L' • SAC 1/16/86 A. PROJECT 372, I -35E UTILITIES & STREETS - ASSESSMENT OBJECTIONS 1. Francis C. Franz (10-02100-010-50) 2. Anna S. Heuer (10-02100-010-78) BACKGROUND INFORMATION The two properties owners referenced above, have previously been addressed by the Special Assessment Committee at the October 9, 1984 meeting pertaining to their similar objections associated with the recent completion of the upgrading of Deerwood Dr from Riverton AV to the east side of I -35E. This upgrading of Deerwood Dr was performed under project 372 by MnDot through cost participa- tion agreement #16932. The information that was previously reviewed by the Special Assessment Committee at the October 9, 1984 meeting has been reproduced and is included with this packet for reference and discussion on these continued assessment objections. A copy of the minutes of the October 9, 1984 Special Assesment Committee meeting has also been included without page number for reference and discussion pertaining to these issues. • Enclosed on page (s) 19 - 2-0 is a proposed Special Assessment Policy that has been prepared by staff for the committee's review and adoption pertaining to assessments associated with the installa- tion of sidewalks or trailways. Although a portion of the Anna Heuer property has been acquired by School .District #196 for the construction of the new Deerwood Elementary School, the frontage location is not affected by this proposed project but will be addressed under project #455 in a manner that anticipates adoption of the recommended policy #86-1. The second and third concerns expressed by the committee at the previous meeting pertained to the determination of "benefitted frontage" by taking into consideration the configuration, topography and 'setback restrictions that may be unique to that parcel. Due to the varying degrees that any of these items can be applied to any particular parcel, it is difficult to create a uniform policy. Therefore, each parcel should be addressed on its own merits. In the situation of the Francie Franz property, the two severed residual portions of his property are located east of I-3'56/north of Deerwood Dr and west of I-35E/south of Deerwood Dr. As can be seen on page 9, -by themselves these parcels have limitations based on their configuration. However, if combined with adjacent parcels (which is likely for development) it will benefit by its full frontage. /9c SAC 1/16/86 • PROJECT 372, I -35E UTILITIES & STREETS (Page 2) In relation to the last item discussed by the committee, it was felt, that this issue should again be addressed by the Special Assessment Committee to the necessity of the adoption of a new Special Assessment Policy. It .is anticipated that the committee's recommendations pertaining to the new policy and disposition of these assessment objections will be forwarded to the Council for formal consideration. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS The staff recommends that Special Assessment Policy #86-1 be adopted and applied to all future and pending public improvement, projects. In addition, it is recommended that a 400' frontage reduction be allocated to Mr. Francis C. Franz (10-02100-010-50) due to the configuration of the residual parcels remaining after MnDot's taking, subject to an agreement whereby this reduction will be assessed at the time of development if combined with adjacent parcels which would eliminate the configuration restriction to benefit. All other assessments as proposed under project #372 for both parcels, shall remain as proposed with the exceptions so noted in this recommendation. • COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS 40 SAC 1/16/86 L VII:' NEW; BUSINESS - A. PROJECT 427, YANKEE DOODLE RD - STREETS 8 STORM SEWER - ASSESSMENT OBJECTIONS 1. Don Sandberg (10-01600-010-26) BACKGROUND INFORMATION On October 15, 1985, the public hearing was held to discuss the proposed improvement under project 427 for Yankee Doodle Rd from T.H. 13 to Federal Dr. This improvement provides for the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Rd from a present two lane, rural ditch section to a four lane road with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities.. Enclosed on page(s) _21 is aletter submitted by Mr. Sandberg requesting consideration by the Special Assessment Committee pertaining to the amount of his related assessments under this project. Enclosed on pageso?� a G are maps showing the location of this parcel. Enclosed on page(s)o) 7 7 o is the proposed assessment roll identifying Mr. Sandbergs and the related street and storm sewer frontage calculations used for determining the amount of the assessments. Although Mr. Sandberg's property incorporates • 390 feet of frontage along Yankee Doodle Rd, it is presently homesteaded as a single family use by Mr. Sandberg. The future subdivision and development of this 7.5 + acres is greatly hampered by the protected wetland incorporating the middle one third of his property. Mr. Sandberg has requested consideration that his assessable frontage be reduced to take into consideration his present single family use and not the entire frontage due to the unlikelyhood of its future subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDAT There is a similar policy that has been used by staff in the past when an existing dwelling wanted to connect to a trunk utility adjacent to their frontage that had never been previously assessed. This normally occurs in situations where the private well or septic system has failed and they want to connect to the City system without changing the use of the property. If the following conditions could be met, the property would be .assessed for only a comparable single family residential frontage: 1. The parcel must be unplatted. 2. The parcel must have a net area of 3 acres (excludes all publicly dedicated right-of-way and ponding easements). 3. Must have a minimum of 200' of -frontage on the public right-of-way where the connection is being made. _ Due. tothe fact that Mr. Sandberg's property meets all of these qualifications and that his "connection" will be a driveway to ��0 SAC 1/16/86 Page 2 ® PROJECT 427 - Don Sandberg (10-016-010-26) a "trunk" street in lieu of the utility connection where this policy has been previously applied, it is recommended that Mr. Sandberg's assessment be reduced to a comparable single family frontage of 100 feet and that the additional assessments associated with the remaining frontage would be assessed at the time of rezoning or development to a higher use under Special Assessment Policy #82-1. E COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS /ff 11 SAC 1/16/86 A. PROJECT 427, Yankee Doodle Road - Streets & Storm Sewer 2. YD Associates (Parcels No. 10-27500-010-01 No. 10-00900-011-52 No. 10-00900-020-52) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the October 15, 1985, Council meeting, a public hearing was held for Project 427, which provided for the upgrading of Yankee Doodle Road from T.H. 13 to Federal Drive from its present two-lane rural ditch section to a four -lane urban street with concrete curb and gutter and related storm sewer facilities. Enclosed on page(s) J O —.3 / is the objection to the assessments for these three parcels as submitted by 'Mr. William Muske at that public hearing. Enclosed on page(s) 0 Z ^ NJJ is a map showing the location of these three parcels in the northeast corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Coachman Road. Also enclosed on page(s) p;�«-is the proposed final assessment roll showing the as- sessable footage for each parcel for its related street and storm sewer improvements. Mr. Muske contends that the assessments associated with these proposed improvements overburdens the property beyond the extend that it can be recovered through ® a future sale or development. STAFF RECOPM7ENDATION Due to the present zoning, anticipated. future use of this property and its corner location, staff feels that this property does benefit by the proposed improvements and that the assessments should remain as proposed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS 0 SAC 1/16/86 V11 NEW'BUSINESS B. PROJECT 447, LONE OAK ADDITION - TRUNK WATER MAIN (T.H. 149) 1. Willard Berfelz (10-03800-010-12) BACKGROUND INFORMATION On August 6, a public hearing was held for the installation of a trunk water main along T.H. 149 from Yankee Doodle Rd to T.H. 55 to provide additional water supply and pressure to the Lone Oak Addition (Northwest Airlines Corporate Headquarters) and the proposed Robins Addition adjacent to I-494 and T.H. 149. Enclosed on page 37 is the assessment objection as submitted by Mr. Berfelz requesting consideration by the Assessment Committee. Enclosed on pages 38 - 38-B are maps showing the location of Mr. Berfelz's property in relationship to the proposed improvement. Also enclosed on pages 39 - 41 are copies of the proposed final assessment roll showing the calculated assessable footage and related assessments. Although this property is presently used as a single family resi- dential dwelling, it is zoned light industrial (LI). Subsequently, the proposed assessment rate used in project 447 was at the commer- cial/industrial rate. Special Assessment Policy #82-2 (page 41-A) presently provides for this property to be assessed at its present use instead of its existing zoning if the property owner executes the required agreements (page 41-B). As can be seen on page 38-A, this property has a triangular confi- guration with an excessive amount of frontage along T.H. 149 in relationship to the size and depth of the parcel. Present Special Assessment Policies indicate that the assessable frontage for these types of lots should be the average of the front and rear footage (270 + 0)- 2 = 135 ft. If the assessable footage policy had been implemented and if the property owner executes the agreement document on page 41-B, the pending assessment could be reduced by existing policies as follows: Total Lateral Benefit Service Assessment 135 x 11.88/ff = $1,603.80 $620.00 $2,223.80 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS If the property owner executes the agreement for Special Assessment Policy #82-2, the staff recommends_ that the rate be reduced to the agricultural/single family rate. In addition, the staff recommends that the assessable footage be reduced to 135 feet in accordance with present policies. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS%COMMENTS a�� SAC 1/1'0/86 kIANNIHM, .10 ® C. PROJECT 404, LEXINGTON PLACE ADDITION - UTILITIES (LEXINGTON AVFNr1E TRUNK WATER MAIN) 1. Patrick McCarthy (10-01500-013-76) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985, final assessment hearing before the City Council, Mr. Patrick .McCarthy submitted the written objection enclosed on page(s) 1,AJ pertaining to the assessments associated with the installation of the trunk water main along Lexington Avenue. Enclosed on page(s) VJ/-4(rare maps showing the location of the McCarthy parcel in relations ip to the trunk utility improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) Y & is the final assessment roll which shows the amount of the assessment determined from the calculated frontage and related assessable rates. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Due to the fact that this 40 ± acre tract will require this trunk water main for internal looping when developed in the future, and taking into consideration that this property does not qualify for any reductions, credits or deferments that have not already been allocated, it is the staff's recommendation that the proposed final assessment be reaffirmed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS SAC 1/16/86 • D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER 1. Patrick McCarthy (10-02200-011-04 BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985, final assessment hearing held by the City Council for the above -referenced project, Mr. Arnold Kempe, attorney for Mr. Patric?5 McCarthy, submitted a written objection enclosed on page(s) J' pertaining to the assessments associated with the trun:c storm sewer installation through his property under that project. Enclosed on page(s) L%O-SI are maps showing the location of Mr. McCarthy's property in relationship to the proposed improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) sZ� is the final assessment roll identifying the proposed assessments and their related calculations. The acquisition of the permanent and temporary construction easements for the installation of this facility was negotiated as a part of the resolution of a special assessment appeal for a previous trunk storm sewer project on another parcel owned by Mr. McCarthy. As a part of these negotiations, considerable care and detail were given to insuring that the pond located on Mr. McCarthy's property would be provided with a storm sewer outlet into the storm sewer ® system at a location and elevation acceptable to him. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Due to the fact that the area proposed to be assessed under this project drains into the storm sewer system and that this property is not entitled to any additional reductions, credits or deferments that have not already been applied, it is the staff's recommendation that the assessments be reaffirmed as proposed. COMMITTEE/RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS z ©3 SAC 1/16/86 • D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER V 2. Don Vogtman (Lot 7 & N35 of 6, Block 1, Skovdale) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985, final assessment hearing held before the City Council, Mr. & Mrs. Vogtman submitted a written objection pertaining to the proposed assessments associated with trunk storm sewer under the above -referenced project. Enclosed on page(s) %s j/ is a copy of this submitted written objection. Enclosed on. page(s�S ','] are maps showing the location of this parcel in relat'onship to the proposed improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) fr is the proposed final assessment roll showing the assessment obligation and the related calculations of detemina- tion. On November 22, staff met with Mr. Vogtman to explain the benefits to his property and the observed drainage patterns resulting from the recent fill that has been placed on this property over the past several years, which has enhanced its ability to be developed in the near future. Due to the fact that Mr. Vogtman came about this property through a financial settlement and his lack of desire to develop this property, he wanted an op- portunity to express his concern to the Special Assessment Committee relating to these assessments. Due to the fact that this property is presently undeveloped and vacant, the "large lot" credit was not applied and the property was assessed based on its entire net area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Due to the .recent fill that has been placed on this property eliminating the previous low drainage basin and redirecting the drainage flow into the storm sewer system service by Project 411, it is the staff's recommendation that this property be determined as being benefitted by this improvement and that the assessment as proposed be reaffirmed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS SAC 1/16/86 D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK - TRUNK STORM SEWER 3. Victor Staff (Lot 5, Block 1, Skovdale.2nd Addition BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 19, 1985, final assessment hearing before the City Council for the above -referenced project, an attorney re- presenting Mr. & Mrs. Staff submitted a written notice of appeal to the proposed speci 1 as essments. A copy of this appeal is enclosed on page(s) �_ Enclosed on pages ]p -JL are maps showing the location of this parcel in relationshi to the storm sewer improvement. Also enclosed on page(s) is the final assessment roll showing the amount of the assessments and the related calculations. In addition to the special assessment appeal action, Mr. & Mrs. Staff have also initiated an adverse condemnation action against the City pertaining to the taking of their property for ponding purposes under this project. On December 20, the City Attorney's office and City staff met with the property owners to discuss the City's .acquisition of a ponding and utility easement across their property and the explanation for the storm sewer area • assessment. The Committee will be updatedregarding the status of this acquisition and any relevance it may have pertaining to their special assessment appeal. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Due to the fact that this property definitely benefits by the establishment of a controlled water elevation protecting their property from excessive flooding and that all appropriate credits, reductions and defermentsi have been taken into consideration, it is the staff's recommendation that the proposed final assessments be reaffirmed. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS zo5 • D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH TRUNK STORM SEWER 4. Ron Boyle (10-02200-011-86 BACKGROUND INFORMATION PARK ADDITION/PATRICK SAC 1/16/86 EAGAN PARK — At the September 17, 1985 final assessment hearing for the above -referenced project held before the City Council, Mr. Ronald Boyle submitted a written objection to the trunk area storm sewer assessments for his parcel. Enclosed on page is the written objection submitted by Mr. Boyle. Enclosed on-page(s) 70 ' 7r are maps showing the location of the property in relationshi to the proposed improvements. Also enclosed on page (s) % 9 is the proposed final assessment roll with the related calculations. As the Committee may recall, similar type objections were reviewed by the Special Assessment Committee at the October 9, 1984, meeting as it pertains to neighboring property owned by Thomas Bergin, Thomas Rooney and Anthony Caponi. As a result of these neighboring objections and the relationship . of the property to the storm sewer improvements installed under Project 411, the City Council subsequently deleted these properties from ® the final assessment roll with the understanding they would be included with any future storm sewer project directly benefitting their property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Based on the action taken by the Special Assessment Committee and City Council pertaining to similar objections of neighboring property owners under this same project, it is the staff's recom- mendation that the assessment against this parcel be deferred until some future project directly benefitting the property. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION/COMMENTS. C' SAC 1/16/86 VII.':NE W BUSINESS%` D. PROJECT 411, BIRCH. PARK ADDITION/PATRICK EAGAN PARK TRUNK STORM SEWER 5. Lilian McCarthy (10-02200-010-02) BACKGROUND INFORMATION At the September 17, 1985 Final Assessment Hearing, a written objection was submitted by the attorney representing Lilian Mc Carthy for the trunk area storm sewer assessments proposed under the above -referenced project. A copy of that objection is enclosed on page(s) IF/ . Maps showing the location of this parcel in relationship to the project are enclosed on page(s) gr2. through Also enclosed on page(s) AS is acopy of the proposed final assessment roll showing how the amount was calculated. As can be seen, although the property incorporates 3.91 acres, only 1.5 acres were assessed at the agricultural/single family rate due to the "large lot" credit allocated this parcel. All drainage from this property directly enters Patrick Eagan Park where the storm sewer system was installed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Based on the fact that all drainage from this property enters the storm sewer system installed under Project 411 and that all available credits and reductionswere applied, it is the staff's recommendation that the assessment be reaffirmed as proposed. • COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS: 2o7 SAC 1/16/86 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY - PARKLAND BACKGROUND INFORMATION The City is presently involved in the preparation of a feasibility report for Project 4448 which discusses the proposed trunk storm sewer outlet for the Holland Lake area along Cliff Road. The necessity of this storm sewer outlet is being dictated by the increased runoff associated with the development in the vicinity of Wilderness Run Road and Dodd Road. The estimated cost of this major trunk storm sewer project is approximately $900,000. Normally, the revenue necessary to finance these types of projects is derived from trunk area assessments over previously unassessed property within the benefitted drainage basin. In this particular project, the majority of the assessable area within this drainage basin incorporates the Lebanon Hills Regional Park under the jurisdiction of Dakota County. Although the entire regional park lies within the drainage basin that would ultimately be serviced by this trunk storm sewer lift station outlet, it would require interconnection of the several11akes and ponds within the par.'s. The map enclosed on page(s) Ox shows the relationship of the park property to the drainage area to the assessment area. • In calculating the assessment liability for the county park property, the agricultural/single family residential rate was used for the 429 acres directly tributary to the storm sewer outlet which resulted in a proposed assessment of approximately $300,000. Due to the fact that the City cannot legally assess another governmental entity, this revenue can only be derived through a cooperative agreement. Preliminary discussions with Dakota County indicate that they do not have the resources available to finance the estimated $300,000 assessment. Subsequently,_ they requested the City to see if any credits, special provisions, etc. can be applied to reduce their assessments to an amount that can be financially acceptable. The county staff has argued that the runoff generated from an undeveloped large regional park system is much less than agricultural or residential property. Subsequently, they feel a new rate classification should be established for parkland property which more accurately reflects the runoff generated and the subsequent .benefit received from any proposed storm sewer project. Enclosed on pages 8L through __9/ is a summary of the assessment issue as described by our consulting engineering firm. Enclosed on page(s) `J L is the present special assessment policy pertaining to trunk area storm sewer. Also enclosed on C' We$ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY -PARKLAND (continued) • on page(s) �7j is the present policy pertaining to parkland and other governmental jurisdiction property. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS Runoff generated from parkland is dependent upon the amount of development associated with its use (active vs. passive). Most neighborhood and community parks are developed and maintained in a manner that generates a comparable amount of runoff as agricultural/single family residential property. However, larger county, regional and state parkland do not significantly increase the amount of runoff from its previous undeveloped passive condition. Therefore, it is the staff's recommendation that consideration be given to establishing a new rate for large undeveloped passive parkland equal to one-half the agricultural/ single family residential rate. This reduced rate would be subject to the execution of an agreement with other jurisdictional agencies whereby additional assessments will be paid with any subsequent development or intensified use. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS/COMMENTS L Agenda Information Memo February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-six CONTRACT 8'6-3/PLANS/ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS/ASHBURY RD C. Contract 86-3, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Ashbury Road - Streets & Utilities) --On December 3, 1985, the Public Hearing was held to discuss the installation of streets and utilities for the construction of Ashbury Drive from the Blackhawk Glen Addition to Blue Cross Road. As a result of that public hearing, the Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications which have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review, approval and authorization to advertise for bids. These plans incorporate the changes that are anticipated with the addendum to this project's feasibility report (Project 454 Addendum) discussed earlier under the Consent Agenda. If, for some reason, these changes are not approved at the time of the Public Hearing, the contract documents have been set up to allow their deletion at the time of contract award. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve the plans and specifications for Contract 86-3 (.Ashbury Road - Streets and • Utilities) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10.310 a.m. on Friday, February 28, 1986. ago MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ® FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 31, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE Airport Noise Enclosed on pages 2/3 through 2-7-!5 for your review is a copy of the final report on the Governor's Task Force on Airport Noise. As the City Council is aware, Mayor Blomquist served as a member of this special Task Force that met since November 1985. Mayor Blomquist and Representative Seaberg have scheduled a meeting for Thursday, February 13, 1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building at which time local, county, regional and state elected officials will be invited to review a number of issues related to the airport noise problem. Also attached on page Z%(, is a copy of the official invitation that was sent out to all elected officials. Please mark your calendar for Thursday, February 13, to attend this meeting. ial Census Tabulation is Enclosed on pages 2 Z through Z 3 7i is a copy of a tabulation that provides detailed information from the special census that was conducted this past fall. Legal Newspaper Rates At the last City Council meeting, a question was raised regarding a comparative analysis of the two newspaper bids that were submitted at the organizational meeting for review. The. analysis was performed and a copy is enclosed on page -,7:53 for your review. Bicycle Plan Recently, a copy of a letter that was prepared for Mayor Blomquist to Dakota County was copied with each informative packet. Enclosed on pages 7- 3through 23-5 is a response from Dakota County regarding the bikeway plan and Mayor Blomqu'ist's letter. Enterprise Development Partnership Program Grant The City received news on January 24 from the Minnesota Higher Education Coordinating Board that the AVTI grant proposal that was written and submitted as a cooperative effort between AVTI and the City of Eagan was not funded. Those communities receiving grants were Bemidji, Crookston, Fergus Falls and the Iron Range communities. • HRA First -Time Home Buyer The City of Eagan was drawn as first-time home buyer monies through all one of the cities to receive the state lottery. Apparently, ®MEMO TO HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS JANUARY 31, 1986 PAGE TWO the City of Eagan was drawn third out of a number of applications that were submitted and will be assured of receiving 7, million dollars which depends on a tax exempt single-family mortgage financing issue. Proposed U.S. Postal Service Facility Enclosed on page 7_3 �, is a copy of correspondence from U.S. Senator Dave Durenberger to Mayor Blomquist regarding a response to the Mayor's letter expressing concerns about the location of the new postal data resource center. Organizational Meeting for Advisory Planning Commission At the January 28 APC organizational meeting, Pam McCrea was appointed Chairperson, Joe Harrison, Vice Chair, and Doris Wilkins, Secretary. Appointed to the Special Assessment Committee is Garrett Mulrooney, and the Developers Task Force - Lori Trygg. ®/s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/jj 11 W/A • � January 27, 1986 The Honorable' Rudy Perpich 130 State Capitol St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Dear Governor Perpich: Metr000litan Council 300 MetrO Square Building Seventh and Robert Sneers St, Paul, Minnesota 55105 ieieonone (612) 291-6359 Enclosed is the report of the Task Force on Airport Noise that you established in October, 1985. This interagency group examined the problem of aircraft noise in the communities surrounding Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport and evaluated potential solutions to this problem at the federal, sate, and local level. A program of solutions which was adopted unanimously is recommended to you in • the report. I would like to emphasize the key recommendation of the report, which is that the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA),negotiate a phased compliance schedule to reduce airport noise. Many of the other recommendations could be implemented as elements of this compliance schedule. Since the Task Force adopted its report on January 9 two events have occured that are related to aircraft noise. The hearing examiner has issued a report on the proposed new M?CA noise regulations that delays their implementation. This ruling does not change my perspective that MPCA and MAC should begin negotiations since MPCA does have existing noise regulations in effect. • In addition, on January 23, Northwest Orient Airlines announced the acquisition of Republic A --Lines. This may offer the potential for noise relief due to less competition, but again, does not negate the need for negotiations between MAC and MPCA to go forward. The new Northwest should be involved in attenuation of aircraft noise. I would urge you to request the executive directors of the Metropolitan Airports COmmiSsic^ and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to imw2 iate'y begin negotiations on this compliance schedule and report back to you by June 1 on their progress. 7-/3 Governor Rudy Perpich January 27, 1986 Page 2 The members of the task force, who are listed in Appendix A of the report, represented state and metropolitan agencies, stage legislators, local units of government and citizens of the area. Through their interest and cooperation we were able to complete this report in an expeditious manner. It is my belief that the problem of airport noise can be alleviated through a continued cooperative effort by all the agencies involved to implement these recommendations. Sincerely, Sandra S. Gardebring Chair, Governor's Task Force on Airport Noise SSG/dof enclosure 0 0' 11 • REPORT OF THE GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON AIRPORT NOISE Adopted January 9, 1986 4 • Introduction Over the past two decades, the communities surrounding the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport (MSP) have been seriously impacted by noise generated by the aircraft using the airport. In the past few years, the problem has become acute. This is principally because of increased aircraft operations resulting from Congress' decision in 1978 to deregulate the airline industry. At the time of deregulation, there were 9 airlines annually flying about 11 million passengers in and out of the airport. That was done with about 220,000 landings and takeoffs. Today, there are 34 airlines flying the same number of passengers; however, the landings and takeoffs have increased to 370,000. Many of the airlines operating at MSP are using older aircraft that are very noisy. One measure of the seriousness of the problem is the dramatic increase in citizen complaints. In July 1985, there were 1,252 complaints as contrasted with 823 in July of the prior year. Finding effective solutions to this problem is complicated by the fragmentation of authority over aircraft and airport operations at the federal, state, regional and local levels. In October, 1985 Governor Perpich authorized this interagency task force chaired by Sandra Gardebring of the Metropolitan Council. Members, who are listed in Appendix A, included representatives of the Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), State Planning Agency, legislators, Department of Transportation. and Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) as well as local units of government and citizens of the area. The specific charge of the task force was to evaluate • potential solutions available at both the federal and state level to the problem of aircraft noise at Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport and to recommend specific proposals to the Governor for both short- and long-term solutions to the problems of airport noise. The task force met eight times between October, 1985 and January, 1986. Perspectives on the problem were presented by MAC, MPCA, the Metropolitan Council, the airline industry, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), state legislators and other interested groups such as the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) and South Metropolitan Airports Action Council (SMAAC). A presentation was heard on the legal constraints and fragmentation of authority between various levels of government. Since airport noise is a problem in many metropolitan areas around the country, solutions being tried in other cities were also examined. A list of 49 possible solutions were prepared and examined by the task force. This list was pared to the options presented in this paper. Emphasis was placed on controlling operations and noise levels rather than adding capacity to the airport. The basic premises of the Task Force in evaluating the range of solutions to the airport noise problem were as follows: Short-term noise reduction should be the primary goal of the Task Force. 2. Initiatives offering long-term relief are equally important and should be recommended, but are no longer sufficient in light of the current -•problemi 3. Legal questions should be considered, but should not be determinative of the recommended course of action. 4. Noise abatement is a multi -jurisdictional responsibility. 5. Noise reduction in one neighborhood should not be accomplished at the • expense of another. Assuming short-term noise reduction as a primary goal the task force did not consider construction of a new airport. A new airport has not been sited in the United States since the late 601s. Further; with the passage of the National Environmental Protection Act in the early 70's, the possibility of such a siting would at the very least be a long-term solution to the problem if it could be done at all. While not completely ruling out this option, it was felt that the task force's best efforts should be directed elsewhere. Background Much work has already been done on the issue of airport noise by several agencies and groups. In 1969 the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) was created as an advisory group by MAC. This was the country's first , successful attempt at bringing together industry representatives, citizens and the airport operator to develop noise abatement strategies. These strategies included creation of a preferential runway system to channel traffic over the Minnesota River and an industrial -commercial area of Eagan, voluntary nighttime restrictions on flights, and reduction of noise from engine.runups. These were significant steps which contained airport noise at a tolerable level for several years. However, there has been a dramatic increase in airline traffic into the Twin Cities since the airline industry was deregulated in • 1978. The traffic levels have substantially increased the duration of noise in affected areas and have decreased the amount of time the.preferential runway system can be used. Deregulation has .also allowed new carriers to enter the marketplace, often by purchasing used aircraft to avoid the substantial investments required for new planes. Prior to 1978 the used aircraft market in the U.S. was relatively inactive; now, however, retirement of an older, noisier airplane by one carrier does not often remove the plane from the national fleet. During the -summer of 1985 aircraft noise reached crisis proportions. A record number of complaints was received by the airport and citizens organizations, notably the South Metropolitan Airports Action Council (SMAAC) renewed their efforts to curtail noise. In addition to the work of this task force there are currently some special local efforts to deal with the problem. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency held public hearings on November 19'and 20 on proposed noise rules which would restrict the amount of noise emanating from aircraft using the airport. MAC is currently completing a voluntary Part 150 Study which has been underway for 2 years. The Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Airport Noise Compatibility Program prescribes the procedures and methodology for preparation of airport noise exposure maps and an airport noise compatibility program. Several of the recommendations in this report are also contained in the Part 150 Study, such as a noise budget, differential landing fees and a night curfew. The Part 150 Study will also seek to establish the environmental 40 capacity of MSP. Defining the airports environmental capacity will help shape the implementation of, and provide a legal basis for, many of the recommendations which follow. I • MAC Chairman, Ray Glumack, has proposed a 16-point program for dealing with the noise, some of which are included in this report. Task Force Recommendations The following recommendations are organized in sections according to the time frame of their noise improvement. Within each section there is no implied priority for individual strategies; they are all intended for implementation as a package. Immediate action on the recommendations in Sections 2-3 is needed even though actual noise reduction will occur at a later date. Recommendation 2 of Section 2, to work out a phased compliance schedule between MAC and MPCA to result in the reduction of airport noise, should be highlighted. This is a key recommendation since many of the other recommendations can be implemented as elements of this compliance schedule. These negotiations should begin immediately with a report made to the Governor by June 1 on their progress. This task force should also be re -convened to review this progress. For each recommendation, the agencies with primary jurisdiction and secondary responsibility are identified as well as a suggested procedure for carrying out the recommendation. SECTION 1 - TARGET: OPEN WINDOW SEASON • 1. Noise Budget -- Using the Logan Airport (Boston) Model, begin immediately to determine aggregate noise level in 1984 and issue an order to the airlines not to exceed this level. Airlines would be free to decide within this budget which planes to use and when (within 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. time frame). However, all would be bound by an allocated ceiling based on 1984 noise levels. After this initial single season rollback, ceilings would be structured in succeeding years to allow noise improvements each year. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Compliance Procedure -- MAC would establish the noise level and begin meetings with the 34 airlines to inform them of the ceiling and to discuss appropriate mechanisms to stay within the noise budget. The compliance schedule would also be negotiated with the airlines. Potential sanctions include loss of terminal space, loss of gates, others. MPCA could make implementation of a noise budget part of a compliance schedule to meet its standards (see Section 2, Strategy 2). 2. Limitations on corporate and private general aviation operations at Minneapolis -St. Paul (MSP) International Airport. No new facilities for general aviation (such as corporate hangars) would be -approved at MSP and incentives would be provided for non-essential users of MSP to move to satellite airports. • General aviation planes are relatively quiet., However, since the, Preferential Runway System is dependent on the total number of aircraft operations and because even environmentally sound aircraft contribute to that total, they•can have the effect of limiting the use of the Preferential Runway System. Combinin this recommendation with other 2(� attempts to limit noisy commercial flights, such as the noise budget, should insure that reducing general aviation flights does not merely open space for more commercial flights. • A program of legal limitations -at MSP and incentives to move to other airports could be implemented. Current efforts such as the installation of an instrument landing system at Airlake Airport and upgrading of St. Paul Downtown Airport are continuing and should show results soon. Further development of all reliever airports should continue into.the future. A minimum landing fee at MSP, regardless of weight, could be imposed immediately as an incentive to land elsewhere. MAC should actively advertise and promote general aviation use of its other airports. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan. Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Metropolitan Council, Legislature Compliance Procedure -- Policy decision to disapprove a request for new facilities at MSP would be made at the Commission level; Metro Council Policy Plan encourages development of reliever airports. The Council also oversees airport development through reviews of EIS's, master plans and MAC's capital improvement budget. This also may fall under proposed legislation to restrict expansion of airport. MAC would be responsible for creating incentives for general aviation to move to satellite airports. 3. Ban all training flights by ordinance, to take effect next summer when Airlake instrumentation is complete. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Compliance Procedure -- MAC would adopt ordinance. 4. Strict enforcement of noise abatement operation procedures and noise sensitivity training for pilots and air traffic controllers. Primary Agencies -- Metropolitan Airports Commission, FAA, Congress Secondary Agency -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Compliance Procedure -- the Metropolitan Airports Commission would become more proactive.and begin immediate meetings with the airlines and FAA, employer of the controllers, to determine appropriate compliance methods. 5. MAC should establish an aggressive 24 hour noise monitoring program at the airport to become more proactive on the noise issue. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Minnesota. Pollution Control Agency Compliance Procedure - MAC should act immediately to establish 24 hour monitoring by people, not -machines, for compliance with noise abatement procedures. People couldquickly respond and point out problems to the control tower for correction. • 71 f. 4 6. Differential landing fees based on noise level of individual aircraft, with • _ lower fees for quieter planes. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Legislature (noise tax) Compliance Procedure -- MAC would begin immediately to develop a process to significantly increase landing fees for noisier aircraft. Fees for major carriers could be increased in 1989 when contracts expire, although the contracts may not be binding if a nuisance or pollutant is created allowing the fee structure to.be changed sooner. Monies derived from this procedure could be dedicated to noise abatement activities. Fees have to be high enough to be a significant disincentive for noisier planes to use the airport. An alternative method would be setting a "noise tax" for take- offs and landings. 7. Additional nighttime restrictions (11 p.m. to 6 a.m. weekdays, 8 a.m. weekends) on all but Stage III aircraft.; There is currently a voluntary nighttime restriction honored by the airlines which keeps flights at a low level. However, there is a possibility the number of flights may grow, especially among general aviation such as cargo and charter flights. Primary Agency --'Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency • Compliance Procedure -- Immediate MAC action to set policy ban based on FAA Part 36 regulations which certify the sound levels of various planes. 8. Limit expansion of MSP facilities until noise abatement program is adopted. Primary Agency -- Minnesota Legislature. Rep. Ken Nelson and Sen. Mike Freeman are introducing bills which would limit expansion of MSP facilities unless such projects are consistent with noise abatement goals. Secondary Agencies -- Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (as part of a compliance procedure) Compliance Procedure -- If the Legislature does not limit expansion, MAC could voluntarily refuse to expand the airport. SECTION 2: MEDIUM RANGE RECOMMENDATIONS (2-5 YEARS) 1. Prepare for litigation involving the FAA with regard to the airport operator's authority to regulate the number of flights at MSP based on environmental capacity considerations. Primary Agencies -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Airports Commission, or other agency with standing. Compliance Procedure -- Research is currently being conducted on relevant • legal issues. *See Appendix H for definition of aircraft stages. Z2� E 2. Work out a phased compliance schedule between MAC and MPCA to result in the reduction of airport noise. This may incorporate noise reduction • techniques such as differential landing fees, noise budgets or land use compatibility guidelines. Primary Agencies -- Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Metropolitan Council Compliance Procedure -- Work on this agreement should begin immediately, with the agencies reporting to the Governor and this task force by June 1 on their progress. 3. Accelerate development of reliever airports to better serve general aviation. Improvements to St. Paul Downtown and Airlake are almost completed but ongoing improvements and amenities to the other airports will be needed to divert further traffic from MSP. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agencies -- Metropolitan Council and possibly state Legislature for change in current law regarding reliever airport improvement. Compliance Procedure -- Metropolitan Council should provide direction in its Aviation Policy Plan. The draft plan recommends an additional minor airport in western Hennepin County. MAC should continue improvements to other airports. do 4. Add an instrument landing system (ILS) to Runway 11L to allow better utilization and more precise higher approaches to this runway. Responsible Agencies -- Federal Aviation Administration, Metropolitan Airports Commission Compliance Procedure-- At the request of Congressman Martin Sabo funding for this improvement is included in the current transportation bill. 5. The Part 150 study currently being undertaken by MAC (with FAA, airline and local government participation) should be completed. This study is looking at the environmental capacity of the airport and will identify ways to curtail noise. Upon completion of this study, MAC will be eligible for federal funds to assist in a noise abatement program. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Secondary Agency -- Federal Aviation Administration Compliance Procedure -- This study should be completed as soon as possible and submitted to the FAA. The study includes several options, some of which are recommended by this task force,; however, the task force has not reviewed or endorsed the complete study. 6. Adopt ban on further manufacture of Stage II aircraft and the import of new • or used Stage II planes from other countries." *See Appendix B for definition of aircraft stages. 1a� 6 Primary Agencies -- Federal Aviation Administration, Congress • Compliance Procedure -- Continued lobbying, possibly congressional action. T. Adopt a ban on any further extension of the Stage I operating cutoff date of January 1, 1988.* Primary Agencies -- Congress, FAA Compliance Procedure -- Continued lobbying, possibly Congressional action. Locally, MAC has adopted an ordinance cutting off use of MSP Airport by most Stage I aircraft already and.will ban all remaining Stage I aircraft after January 1, 1988. 8. Adoption and enforcement of Metropolitan Council's Land Use Compatibility Guidelines by all affected municipalities to prevent development of vacant land into noise sensitive uses. Primary Agencies -- Municipalities, Metropolitan Council Compliance Procedure -- Those municipalities which have not incorporated these guidelines into their comprehensive plans and zoning should do so immediately. Metropolitan Council should enforce Metropolitan Land Planning Act. Airport and FAA must maintain flight patterns upon which these land uses are based. • 9. Coordinated soundproofing plan where sound insulation is provided to schools and public buildings, and to homes on a voluntary basis, with full cost (depending on building location) provided by MAC or another designated agency. Primary Agency -- Metropolitan Airports Commission Compliance Procedure -- MAC and Minneapolis should complete pilot insulation program as soon as possible and MAC should institute a continuing comprehensive plan of insulation in all affected municipalities funded through a differential landing fee, jet fuel tax or other sources. This insulation plan should be based on the F.A.R. Part 150 Study now being prepared. SECTION 3: POST -1990 1. A.ban on operation of Stage II aircraft should be adopted to be implemented by 1995. Primary Agency -- Federal Aviation Administration, Congress Compliance Procedure -- Continued lobbying by members of Task Force, possible Congressional action. • *See Appendix B for definition of aircraft stages. 122-'Z- 7 Zv 7 SECTION 4: OTHER POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS • Solutions identified in this section have been discussed by the Task Force and are passed forward without specific recommendation or endorsement. Some are actions already underway; others have not been endorsed by the Task Force due to a lack of information on their noise benefits. It is possible they should be considered after further information becomes available. 1. Implement extension of Runway 4/22. Completion of the environmental impact statement for this extension would provide the information needed to fully assess its potential for noise abatement and its economic impact. 2. Installation of a Microwave Landing System will allow curved and variable approach.paths, as well as varied glide slopes. Actual benefit_to noise levels requires further study. 3. Implementation of long-term comprehensive airport plans at all system airports by 1990. 4. Limited acquisition of homes in highest noise areas, preferably on a voluntary basis, by MAC or another agency, possibly with money from a Noise Abatement Trust Fund established with differential landing fees. 5. Tax reduction plan for houses impacted by aircraft noise. This has implications of selling airlines a license to make noise. The money that would be needed to reduce taxes may be better spent on actual reduction of noise. 6. Stricter compliance with Eagan departure corridor and three-mile turn rule would obtain maximum acoustical benefits from runway 11L and 11R. This is an operating procedure (part of the "preferential runway system") which previously had great benefits by concentrating aircraft approaches and departures over an industrial/commercial area of Eagan, rather than residential areas which surround the airport in most other directions. However, with increased traffic in recent years, these procedures decrease the amount of time runways 11L and 11R can be used, and increase the amount of traffic departing over South Minneapolis,, where planes can turn and be fanned out sooner than three miles. 7. MAC has passed, and is promoting among others, a resolution favoring limited re -regulation of the aviation industry to control noise (i.e., limiting the number of flights between two points); Minneapolis has also passed a similar resolution. NOISEI Z;� 3 8 • NIT r-Itu ®F acog 1� 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612)454-8100 January 30, 1986 MAYORS & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS REPRESENTING THE CITIES OF BURNSVILLE, EAGAN, INVER GROVE HEIGHTS, LILYDALE, MENDOTA AND MENDOTA HEIGHTS UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE BILL FRENZEL MINNESOTA STATE SENATOR HOWARD KNUTSON MINNESOTA STATE SENATOR CONRAD VEGA MINNESOTA STATE REPRESENTATIVE CHARLES HALBERG MINNESOTA STATE REPRESENTATIVE JAMES,METZEN DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER STEVE LOEDING DAKOTA COUNTY COMMISSIONER RUSS STREEFLAND DAKOTA COUNTY.COMMISSIONER JOHN VOSS METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE RAY JOACHIM METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE MARY MARTIN Dear Fellow Elected Officials & Metropolitan Council Representatives: BEA BLOMQUIST MOVOI THOMAS EGAN JAMES A, SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Nembers THOMAS HEDGES CW A0miniSR010r EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city Clerk Representative Art Seaberg and I, along with Mayor Morrison, have discussed the importance of holding a joint meeting of elected officials to discuss recent measures that have been taken to address the growing airport noise issue. The special Governor's Task Force met and has presented a list of findings to Governor Perpich regarding airport noise. The findings of this committee would be most interesting to all of .you as elected officials. In addition, MASAC, MAC and the Environmental and Natural Resources Committee of the House of Representatives are all actively addressing the growing impact of airport noise. Since there are so many.different groups dealing with airport noise, it seemed appropriate that a meeting be scheduled at a central location to brief all elected officials on action that is being considered for the reduction and control of airport noise. A meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, February 13, 1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building. The time of the meeting is 7:00 p.m. and should last no later than 8:30 - 9:00 p.m. If you have staff or volunteer representatives within your community who are actively working on the airport noise issue, they are more than welcome to attend this briefing session. SincerelyAmquist Bea B1 Mayor BB/TLH/kf zZIO cc: Art Seaberg, State Rep THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 0 S O R R Y! It's six o'clock p.m. and the 'IBM Copier has completely ,broken down. We have tried everything to get it running again but it refuses to budge. The remainder of the Informative Memo will be sent out on Monday. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. .•