02/18/1986 - City Council RegularAGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
FAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department D. Public Works Department
Ppio B. Police Department 'pZQE. Cable Commission
1,10 C. Parks & Recreation Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
2-1 A. Contractor Licenses
7.3 B. Personnel Items
F175 C. Correction of March 5, 1985, City Council minutes
Z 6 D. Contract 84-13, Final Payment/Acceptance, Water Booster Station
ZOO E. Project 427, Resolutions Restricting Parking (Yankee Doodle
Road, T.H. 13 to Federal Drive)
Z F. Project 467, Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize Public Hearing
a (Wescott Road - Lexington to 1/2 Mile East)
22f
p.G. Contract 85-02, Final Payment/Acceptance, Peaceful Heights
(Streets & Utilities)
p,Zq H. Contract 84-08, Final Payment/Acceptance, Westbury & Lexington
Square (Streets & Utilities)
29 I. Contract 85-03, Change Order #1, Slaters Acres (Street &
1 f Utilities)
;.„_:32) J. Contract 85-07, Change Order #1, Eagandale/Lemay Lake (Streets &.
Utilities)
�.3t K. Project 470, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report
(Greensboro Addition - Streets & Utilities)
S/L. Project 471, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (West
Service Road - Storm Sewer)
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
Q,3Z A. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road (Streets -.Beau de
Rue to Kings Road - Continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
P.3 B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview
a Meadows Addition - Continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
�.3 T C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian
Road - Continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
t�0 D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 411 (Lillian McCarthy - Trunk
Storm Sewer, Continued from February 4; 1986, meeting)
E. Public Hearing, Vacation of Utility Easement for Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, Knob Hill of Eagan
1
VI. 'OLD BUSINESS
P, A. Preliminary Plat Revision, Northview Meadows (Sienna
Corporation/Rod Hardy) Located South of Diff ley Road Between
Lexington Avenue and Dodd Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 26
B. Park Consultant Appointment and Fee Schedule Consideration
(continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
C. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission
(continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
p,Jrf D. Conditional Use Permit for Utility Building, Northwestern Bell
1 Telephone, Located South of County Road 30 (Diff ley Road) and
West of Dodd Road, NW 1/4 of Section 25 (continued from January
21, 1966, meeting)
p 77, E. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single -Family Lots on 40 Acres and a
Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) -
Greensboro/Dave Gabbert, Located in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of
Section 14, North of Wescott Road and West of Lexington Avenue
�.76 F. Public Works Garage Final Concept Design
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Review of On -Sale Liquor License Policy
I �,9 B. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 9.5 Acres and Con-
taining 144 Apartment Units (Stuarts's First Addition - Stuart
Nolan) Located on Outlots A & B, Tomark 2nd Addition, South of
Yankee Doodle Road and East of Lexington Avenue, NW 1/4 of
Section 14
/60 C. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximate 5 Acres & Containing
T. 1 Lot and a Rezoning from PD (Planned Development - Lexington
Place PD) to PF (Public Facilities) Advent United Methodist
Church, Located South of Westbury Drive and West of Lexington
Avenue, NE 1/4 of Section 22
1/%i D. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 2.1 Acres and
P Containing 1 Strip Commercial Facility with 18,620 S.F. Strip/
Retail Center and a Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru
Restaurant Facility and a Pylon Sign (K Charles Development
Corporation) Located South of Duckwood Drive and East of
Krestwood Lane, NW 1/4 of Section 15
/Z 3 E. Conditional Use Permit for Above -Ground Liquid Storage Tanks
(Airco Industrial Gases) Located on 2.3 Acres on Lot 5 of Robert
O'Neill Homestead, Located North of T.H. 55 and Dodd Road, SE
1/4 of Section 2
�3a F. Site Plan Review (Eagan Center/Mark Ravich) Located East of
Lexington Avenue and South of County Road 30, SE 1/4 of Section
23
VIII. '/ ADDITIONAL ITEMS
p, 134 A. Contract 86-5, Approve Plans and Specifications (Windtree 5th
1 and 6th Additions
B. Contract 86-7, Approve Plans and Specifications (O'Neil Pond)
IR. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
R. ADJOURNMENT
0
,'s
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE-MINUTES
After approval is given to the February 18, 1986, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the February 4 and special minutes
for the January 14; January 23, and February 13 meetings, the fol-
lowing items are in order for consideration:
A. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. Fire Chief Childers is requesting special consideration to
refurbish the 1971 C-900 Ford pumper truck. This item was discussed
during the development of the 1986 budget and as a result of City
Council deliberations, was partially funded. The number of items
listed by Custom Fire Apparatus in their proposal was quite lengthy
and it was decided during budget preparation that additional infor-
mation and clarification was needed if all the improvements to
the pumper truck were to be further considered. The City
Administrator and Fire Chief Childers have met and discussed,
in detail, the proposal. A copy of a memorandum describing the
equipment repairs and the original proposal from Custom Fire
Apparatus, Inc. are enclosed on pages_ through -
for review. Fire Chief Childers will be present to answer qu s� tions
and further discuss this item at the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS
approval or modification fo the
of the 1971 C-900 Ford pumper truck.
ITEM: To approve or deny the
proposal for the refurbishing
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILI-1EMBP:RS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: REFURBISH 1971 C-900 FORD FIRE PUMPER
A budget request was submitted by the Fire Department last fall in
the amount of $39,000 to refurbish the 1971 C-900 Ford pumper. The
original request included $25,500 for the pumper, $4,500 for the
aerial and approximately $4,000 for grass rig #7. The remaining
amount was budgeted for unscheduled repair. The Fire Department
was able to complete the refurbishing of the aerial trunk during
1985 and is willing to reschedule to a later date the refurbishing
of grass rig #7. Since the City Council budgeted $12,000 for the
refurbishing of equipment, an additional $14,550 would be needed
if this pumper truck is to be completely refurbished in 1986.
The City Administrator has met with Fire Chief Childers and
reviewed in detail the modifications and refurbishing for this
piece of equipment. As you recall, Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc.,
has provided a specific description of modifications that would
occur to the pumper truck. Attached is a copy of the description
that was distributed as a part of the draft budget late last
sum.-ner/early fall. Direction was given by the City Council to
review in greater detail the general description and further
determine whether all of the modifications as suggested by Custom
Fire Apparatus, Inc., need to occur at this time. Iwill attempt
to provide some additional information using the sub -categories
outlined in the description by Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc.
CHASSIS CAB
® The description that was offered for the chassis cab is
self-explanatory and there is no additional description
offered by the Fire Chief and City Administrator.
FIRE PUMP COMPARTMENT
Apparently there is considerable rust building up' on the
compartment and once the compartment is cleaned it will be
easier to use and maintain. The Fire Department is experi-
encing problems with gauges freezing which could be critical
at a fire. The Department is ,attempting to make the pumper
more compatible with large diameter hose and relay operations
since the tanker truck is no longer used for fire suppression.
CREW COMPARTMENT
Again, rehabilitation is desired for the purpose of reducing
future maintenance. Some rust is occurring and by cleaning
7—
MEMO: MAYOR & COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 14, 1986
PAGE TWO
up this area of the equipment, rust will be prevented in the
future, expanding the longevity of the equipment. Apparently,
the crew cab is in direct violation of OSHA standards and by
making the various modifications suggested in the letter of
description, noise will be reduced and meet the OSHA standards.
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING
The doors are starting to sag and the refinishing will reduce
maintenance and allow the doors to work properly. According
to Fire Chief Childers, there is a safety factor involved
with this item.
Apparently the present tank has been repaired numerous times
and is still leaking water. By replacing the 500 gallon
capacity water tank and adding a new 750 booster tank, the
Fire Department will increase their storage capacity and be
assured of storage once the pumper is called out to a fire.
On page 4, the relocation of the galvanized pipe is designed
to prevent freezing. Apparently, the Fire Department has had
problems with this equipment freezing; again, a critical
problem at the time of fire suppression needs. Another
modification on page 4 relates to changes necessary to accom-
modate the larger diameter hose. There are electrical prob-
lems that have been experienced with this pumper truck;
therefore, changes are desired as a part of the refurbishing.
The Department is concerned that this truck may not meet ISO
standards and, therefore, many of the modifications are needed
for satisfaction of that requirement. In recent years, the
Fire Department has spent approximately $5,000 for pump re-
pairs and feel the pump should be in good shape after the few
repairs that are identified on page 5 are completed.
The 1971 C-900 Ford pumper is currently located at Station $3. The
proposed refurbishing cost, assuming all the repairs are made,
would amount to approximately $26,000-$26,500. The City has
budgeted $12,000 in 1986 for these repairs. Fire Chief Childers
has stated that if the repairs are made, the equipment should last
the City approximately another ten (10) years. A new pumper truck
designed to meet these specifications would cost the City approxi-
mately $150,000 with delivery in excess of 12 months.
At the time the budget was considered and adopted, the City Admin-
istrator was directed to contact Fire Chief Childers for additional
3
MEMO: MAYOR & COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 14, 1985
PAGE THREE a -
information and explanation regarding the request to refurbish
this piece of equipment. Due to Fire Chief• Childers' 10 -week
training in Seattle, Washington, this matter was deferred for
consideration until January.
Fire Chief Childers is expected to be at the meeting on Tuesday to
answer any questions and will be asking for consideration by the
Council to amend the budget and allow the modifications and
refurbishing to occur for the 1971 pumper truck.
® City Administratoll
CC. Fire Chief Childers
TLH/kf
•
TT tl;i 4 ,
Airport Road a P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715)294-2555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
The following modifications and refurbishing to be completed on your C-900
Ford/General Fire Department Pumpers.
CHASSIS CAB:
The Ford chassis cab is to be stripped of all chrome and electrical fixtures/
accessories including rear view mirrors, spotlights, emergency lights, grille,
bumper, and front cab fenders, left and right sides. The entire chassis cab
exterior is to be power sanded and hand sanded to a smooth finish, removing
all scratches and chips in the original paint coatings. The surface rust
damaged areas are to be sanded to bare metal, properly prepared with rust
preventative and properly primed. Fender attachment areas, left and right
sides, to be repaired with all -rust damaged areas being cut out and new
metal fabrications being welded in position and properly filled.
(Engine No. 6/1971 Pumper) The right front cab door, upper rear corner, to
be repaired to properly fit door opening. Mirror mounting area to be
straightened prior to refinishing.
The entire exterior of the chassis cab is to be painted with nonsanding zinc
chromate primer and sprayed with two full coats of acrylic enamel with urethane
hardeners and gloss additives. After final painting, all chrome trim and
electrical fixtures shall be reinstalled, using new fasteners where necessary.
Cab entrance step areas to be trimmed with polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate
material. All chrome and electrical fixtures to be properly cleaned and
polished prior to reinstallation.
FIRE PUMP COMPARTMENT:
The left side fire pump operator's panel is to be completely disassembled,
removing all gauges, controls'and nametags.Original pump panel area to be
overlaid with brushed stainless steel, equipped with new brushed stainless
steel full width integral light housing. A full width, brushed stainless
steel tilt -out style pump gauge panel to be fabricated and installed complete
with polished stainless steel hinge and double adjustable grip latches.
Original pump pressure and pump compound gauges and individual discharge
pressure gauges to be removed and exchanged for two new 4-1/2 inch diameter
pump pressure and compound gauges, and six new 3-1/2 inch diameter individual
discharge pressure gauges. All gauges to be Span Sub -Z II, liquid -filled,
freeze -proof type, properly identified with permanent metal nametags below
each gauge.
Brushed stainless steel panel overlay to be properly drilled and fitted
prior to final painting and reinstalled after final painting. Sides of
stainlesy steel to be trimmed with polished aluminum extrusions.
A new, 3-1/2 inch i.d. large diameter remote-controlled discharge valve
to be furnished, located inside heated pump compartment with discharge outlet
located on right side apparatus body. Discharge to be equipped with 4=inch'
Storz adapter with 4 -inch Storz x 2-1/2 inch NST reducing adapter with NST
cap and chain.
•
•
Pale 1. a
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS.INC.
Airport Road O P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 a (715)294.2555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: `Eagan Fire Department
CREW COMPARTMENT:
The body -mounted crew cab to be entirely stripped of all original paint
coatings and trim accessories, interior and exterior. Crew cab doors
to be removed. Entire interior of crew cab to be disassembled with all
seating removed and floor sections disassembled and discarded. Crew cab
doors to be disassembled. Crew cab interior and exterior to be stripped of
original paint Coatings (chemically or sandblasting) and prepared for new
refinishing.
The interior of the crew cab floor, upper and lower levels, is to be fitted
with new polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate fabrications, bolted in position
and removable.
• The interior crew cab seating areas are to be recovered with black naugahyde,
including new foam cushions.
The interior crew cab rear window is to be removed and discarded. The original
rear window opening to be enlarged and equipped with a new sliding rear window
.unit.
The interior and exterior of the crew cab area is to be properly prepared and
repainted, same as specified for above chassis cab.
Interior crew cab doors and interior of crew cab to be lined with Antiphon 13
sound dampening pad and overlaid with 1 -inch thick naugahyde covered foam
sound insulation material. Material to be applied with adhesive and aluminum
fabrications in all corners.
After final painting, new aluminum crew cab floor sections to be reinstalled
with neoprene rubber liners between all aluminum and steel mounting areas.
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING:
The entire apparatus body shall be stripped of all accessories including:
compartment doors, hinges, door latches, handrails and brackets, lighting
fixtures, drip mouldings, wiring, pump control rods, pump pressure gauges,
pump nametags, compartment floors, compartment shelves, and all runningboards
and steps.
The original compartment door hinges are to be removed. New polished stainless
steel piano -type hinges to be furnished and installed on all compartment doors
and crew cab doors prior to final assembly and refinishing of apparatus body.
New stainless hinges to be polished for chrome -like finish, bolted to doors
and body using hardened button socket headcap screw fasteners'. Doors to be
properly.fit with new hinges and removedjor body finishing.
OPTION: Remove and discard original small -diameter chrome plated D -handle
double point latch assemblies; furnish and install new large diameter D -handle
chrome latch assemblies, complete with bent rings and neoprene rubber door
skin gaskets. Please add: $300.00.
�P
Page 2.
CUSTOM ' FIRE APPARATU& INC.
Airport Road • P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715)2942555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING: Cont'd.
OPTION: Furnish and install new painted galvanized steel fabricated adjustable
compartment shelves, complete with polished stainless steel track assemblies.
Shelves to be located in all full height compartments. Please add: $250.00.
OPTION: Furnish and install new 5 -inch diameter chrome plated interior 12 -volt
light fixtures in compartment tops and under all shelving areas. Please
add: $200.00.
Original rear mounted booster hose reel with hose and nozzle to be removed
and exchanged for above specified body modifications.
Entire apparatus body, exterior and compartment interiors, to be sandblasted
to a new white metal finish and properly prepared for refinishing.
Fabricate and install new polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate runningboards
and compartment floors and rear step platform area. Runningboards to be
fabricated of .125 -inch polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate material, designed
to replace original steel runningboards. Runningboards to be installed,
removed, and re -installed after final finish painting.
Rear apparatus body compartmentation to be,removed and discarded. New full
width rear compartment to be fabricated with rear body paneling constructed
of polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate material. A new, full -width roll -up
style "shutter door" to be furnished. Door to be minimum 60 -inches wide,
30 -inches high, to provide unobstructed compartment opening.
Remove original 500 gallon capacity water tank and discard.'
A new 750 gallon capacity booster tank to be fabricated and furnished.
Tank is to be constructed of pickled and oiled heavy plate steel with "stress- •
relieved" construction, rectangular T-shaped, complete with forward filler stack
and interior vent. Tank interior to be sandblasted and spray coated with
Super Tank Solution. The tank is to be of the wirefeed welded construction
inside and out, provided with interior baffles per NFPA Requirements. Tank to
be equipped with removable top section with hold down 'bolts not exposed to water.
Tank to be designed to replace original water tank, installed with proper
regard to weight distribution and easily removable from the body. Tank bottom
to be fabricated of quarter -inch steel plate. Ends to be fabricated of 3/16 -inch
steel plate. Sides and top to be fabricated of 10 -gauger Tank to be equipped
with eight individual removable magensium annodes, one per baffled compartment.
Original tank level gauge and discharge and suction connections to be removed
and discarded. New, 3 -inch i.d. tank suction sump area to be furnished, complete
with removable clean-out plug. Water tank exterior to be vinyl wash primed,
zinc chromate primed, enamel painted and.rust-proofed prior to installation
in the apparatus body.
A new, 3 -inch i.d. Elkhart brass ball valve to be furnished, located between
tank and pump suction inlet. Valve to be installed with flexible connection
designed with no elbow between tank and pump. Tank suction valve to allow for
550 gallon per minute flow from tank -to -pump.
pnre 3.
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS.I G.
Airport Road O P.O. Box°577 O Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715)294-2555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING: Cont'd.
Two 3 -inch i.d. galvanized pipe discharges to run through tank interior
with outlets located at regi of apparatus body above rear compartment door.
Outlets to be located per Customer's requirements, piped to original rear
discharge valves.
Two 1-1/2 inch'i.d. galvanized pipe discharges to be furnished through
tank interior with outlets located at rear of apparatus body, above rear
compartment door. Two new 1-1/2 inch locking style brass ball gated discharges
to be furnished, piped to above specified rear 1-1/2 inch outlets. Valves
to be Operator's panel controlled, located inside heated pump compartment,
equipped with individual 3-1/2 inch diameter pressure gauges.
• Original hosebed mounted ladder compartment to be disassembled and discarded.
Three new galvanized steel triple -formed adjustable hosebed dividers to be
fabricated and installed in main hosebed area. Dividers to be equipped with
vertical wood liners to prevent snagging of hose, fully adjustable per
Customer's requirements.
OPTION: All vertically hinged compartment doors to be modified to include
installation of stainless steel rod/spring-style door holder assemblies.
Door holders to be designed to hold compartment doors in the "Open" and
"Closed" positions. Door holder assemblies to be bolted in position and
removable, designed to replace original chain -style door stops. Please
add: $400.00.
After proper sandblasting, body exterior and interior of all compartments shall
be power sanded for smooth finish. All rusted areas to be sandblasted and
® properly caulked prior to refinishing. Rust damaged areas to be cut out with
new metal fabrications welded into position.
The entire apparatus body and crew cab areas, after proper paint removal, shall
be machine sanded, vinyl wash primed, zinc chromate primed, and sprayd with two
full coats of acrylic enamel with urethane hardeners and gloss additives.
After above specified painting, the entire apparatus body is to be re -assembled, .
using all new zinc plated hardened fasteners. All compartment doors to be
reinstalled with polished stainless steel piano hinges bolted in place with
hardened zinc plated fasteners. New compartment door weatherstripping to be
provided on all compartments and crew cab areas.
All chrome and electrical fixtures shall be properly cleaned and re -installed
on apparatus body using new fasteners. Any damaged wiring and light fixtures
shall be.replaced with equipment and pricing to be approved by the Fire Chief.
The entire apparatus body and crew cab areas to be rewired with new master loom
extending from chassis cab to rear of apparatus body. New 10 -wire junction block
shall be furnished and located inside rearcompartment. All wiring shall terminate
at the 10 -wire junction block and extend to individual light fixtures throughout
Page 4.
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS.INC.
Airport Road • P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715) 2942555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING: Cont'd.
the body compartmentation. All compartment light fixtures shall be rewired
and new bulb elements to be furnished.
After completed modifications and refurbishing per the above specifications,
the chassis cab doors shall be relettered with hand -painted gold leaf with
black shading. -The apparatus body is to be striped with gold stripe and black
trim lines. Full length, 2 -inch wide ScotchLite Safety Stripe shall be
provided, running full length of apparatus body, left and right sides.
The entire fire pump system shall be recertified in accordance with new NFPA
test standards. Certification to include pump pressure test, pump vacuum test,
recalibration of pressure gauges, adjusting pump packing, change pump gear lube,
lubricate pump system, and a 2 -hour recertification test with proper recordings •
and recertification forms.
Total cost for the above rebuilding/refinishing and modifications: $25,640.00
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
2. Fire Chief Childers is suggesting that .the City request an
ISO inspection for purposes of lowering the insurance rating that
is currently at 6.. The City has not received an ISO inspection
for several years and it is the feeling of both the Fire Chief
and City Administrator that due to excessive water main installa-
tion, hydrants and storage capacity during the past several years,
the addition of Fire Station #3 and additional fire suppression
equipment that Eagan could, more then likely, qualify for a lower
rating. The city of Bloomington has recently concluded an ISO
inspection and their rating is now a 3. A change in the fire
rating would have a favorable- impact on the insurance rates for
commercial and industrial property located throughout the City.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To direct the City
Administrator to seek an ISO inspection for the purpose of lowering
commercial/industrial insurance rates throughout the community.
B. POLICE DEPARTMENT
There are no items to be discussed under Police Department at
this time.
C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. Attached on pages through _/-- for your review
and direction to the Parks and Recreation Commission is a memo
outlining concerns related to the continued use of snowmobiles
in the City of Eagan. Concerns raised by the Commission pertain
directly to the snowmobiles in City parks. There is no official
action required on this item, however, any direction to the Parks
and Recreation Commission would be helpful.
/D
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY
FROM: KEN VRAA,.DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 24, 1986
RE: ADVISORY PAM & RECREATION COMMISSION
SNOWMOBILE USE CONCERNS
ISSUE
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission is seeking direction from the City
Council concerning continued use of snowmobiles within the City.
BACKGROUND
At the January meeting of the Advisory Commission, the Commission discussed
problems that were being encountered with the use of snowmobiles in the City,
and particularly, in City parks.
In the course of discussion of the issue, the Commission identified several
subfactors influencing their thinking regarding snowmobiling.
1) An apparent increase in the number of complaints and observable problems
from previous years and an increasing number of conflicts in use between
snowmobilers and vehicles - snowmobilers and pedestrians.
I
2) The Eagan Snowmobile Club's declining interest in the continuation of the
Highline Trail and Johnny Cake IRidge trails apparently because of
increasing traffic on residential and collector streets, as well as the
completion of I -35E. (Maynard Ohm has so indicated this.)
3) Lack of volunteer enforcement of the Eagan ordinance from the snowmobile
• club and the inability of the police to patrol all areas.
4) Early snowfalls provided ideal snowmobiling conditions, thus increasing
the amount of snowmobile traffic.
5) Increasing vehicle traffic on City streets causes additional conflict and
liability.
After reviewing the information available, the Commission determined that
before it makes recommendations or takes any action concerning the use of
snowmobiles within the City, and in particular City parks, they wish direction
from the City Council and if members of the Council had received complaints or
observed the same problems.
It is suggested that if continuation of snowmobiles along the Highline and
Johnny Cake Ridge Road, as well as residential streets, is of greater
detriment than value, perhapa then snowmobiles should be discontinued. It was
also suggested that the Commission hold an informational meeting to determine
interest in continuation of snowmobiles in the City or if there is adverse
reaction by the public to their continued use. The informational
meeting/public hearing would then be able to help shape public policy
regarding the continued use/disuse in the City if the Council felt such a need
existed.
FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Provide the A.P.R.C. with direction regarding the issue of snowmobiles within
the City.
Respectfully Submitted On Behalf Of The Advisory Parks & Recreation
Comm on,
VIII �
Recreation
KV/js
v
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Three
2. The Parks and Recreation Commission had planned to review
the Parks Dedication Ordinance at their last regular meeting.
Due to the number of agenda items and length of the meeting it
was not possible to review the Parks D=_dication ordinance however,
it is on their agenda for the March 6, 1986 meeting. The Director
of Parks and Recreation would like any thoughts or direction the
City Council might have regarding various suggestions that are
discussed in the attached memorandum found on pages I5 through
Ken has raised several issues in his report to the
PAS and Recreation Commission and is suggesting that consideration
be given to a change in the—current policy and. further that the
City Code's chapter on subdivisions -be-,amended to adopt the park
systems plan by reference. The park systems plan would include
park land dedication requirements. There is no official action
required on this item, however,direction to the Parks and Recreation
Director and Commission is being requested.
/3
ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1986
BE: PARKS DEDICATION ORDINANCE REVIEW
At the time of the annual review of the parks dedication requirements, the
Advisory Commission requested staff to .prepare a report which would address
several areas of concern expressed by the Commission.
Subsequently, a memorandum was addressed to the Commission indicating that
other communities were also reviewing their parks dedication ordinance for
possible revision; that the directors from these communities were to meet,
• discuss, and perhaps work together in a review process.
The Directors of Parks & Recreation from the communities of Maple Grove,
Plymouth, Eden Prairie, Lakeville and Eagan, as well the Economics Director
from the City of Blaine, met for nearly a full day to critically evaluate each
ordinance and the relationship it has with existing state law and judicial
findings. It is not the intent of this memorandum to review all that was
discussed at this meeting. It is important to note that from this observer's
standpoint there can be no single ordinance which could be easily adopted by
each community. Significant differences in each community, philosophical and
the current status of their respective park systems, make such a document
improbable to develop. However, this meeting did produce some significant
discussion which should help this community to improve its parks dedication
ordinance.
MEETING OBSERVATIONS
• It is this writer's opinion that Eagan's parks dedication ordinance, at least
philosophically, is one of the strongest and fairest to developers. In
comparison, it was noted that 1) Eagan is the only community that provides
for partial parkland dedication credit for areas which are below the 100 year
flood mark, 2) provides park dedication credit for areas which are part of
utility easements. 3) The City's commercial/industrial park dedication
requirement provides for credit where there are significant on-site provisions
for parks and open space.
It still appears that Eagan's parks dedication ordinance could, and indeed
should be strengthened to better comply with State statutes. For example, the
Eagan dedication ordinance should ,1) strengthen the relationship between the
amount of dedication (land or cash) and the impact of the subdivision's
platting and its relationship to parkland needs. 2) The existing land
dedication provides for a constant percentage - 10% - regardless of density.
This can be construed as "inequitable" and therefore, should be reviewed for
modifications.
It must be recognized that it is not the intent of the strengthening of this i
ordinance to mean to increase parks dedication. Rather, strengthen means to
better show the relationship between the platting review, the need for parks,
its reasonableness in order to comply with the State statutes and thus, make
it less susceptible to court challenge.
STATE STATUTE
Attached is the State statute which initially allowed for cities to develop
and implement parks dedication ordinances. In providing for these
regulations, it should be noted that there are several key words and phrases
which are significantly important. The first of these is that "a reasonable
portion of any proposed subdivision be dedicated." The second is that
dedication, at least for cash, should be "based on the fair market value of
the land no later than at the time of the final approval." Third, "a
municipality reasonably determines that it will need to acquire that portion
of land for the purposes stated."
1
In essence, these are the three—critical issues that a parks dedication
ordinance should address. --
Perhaps one of the most significant court cases relating to parks dedication
is Koolis vs. the City of Bloomington in which the State Supreme Court upheld
Bloomington and that its 10% land dedication was a reasonable portion.
Consequently, many communities have adopted the 10% standard. A word of
caution in adopting this 10% standard. Municipalities still must be able to
demonstrate that this is reasonable and that it will need to acquire this
percentage and a particular parcel for parks purposes to satisfy the residents
needs. Because of Eagan's Park Systems Plan which contains a significant
amount of information regarding the demographics of the community (as well as
projected future growth and development), individual park standards, ratios of
facilities, a neighborhood park standard, the type/quality of property the
City seeks to acquire for parks purposes and has defined parks service areas,
as well as pencil locations for parks, the City is in an
excellent position to support its case for parks dedication as reasonable. It
would seem prudent, however to incorporate and/or at least identify the Park
Systems Plan and its continuing updating as the basis for the City of Eagan's
parks dedication ordinance. Further, because the City has established its
standards for parks based on population, it would then seem appropriate to
establish its land dedication (and cash) based on population - i.e. density of
a development.
A constant land dedication of 10% for single family as well as for multiple
family development of high living unit density per acre is, in fact,
inequitable and may be a case for unreasonableness.
It would be prudent for the City to have a land dedication requirement that is
based on a sliding scale which increases with unit density and has a basis, in
fact, for providing parks in relationship to demand/impact.
BASED UPON FAIR MARKET VALUE
State statutes indicate that the municipality must base its dedication on
"fair market value." A review of other cases indicates that it appears
acceptable and reasonable for a municipality to establish market value
collectively, rather than for a single parcel being considered for
subdivision. It also appears acceptable to set the value at the time of the
final subdivision plat rather than raw land value. In summation, it appears
215
•
•
that the City of Eagan's history of setting values for parks cash dedication
that is based on recent land sales is an appropriate methodology. Therefore,
staff would recommend that this procedure continue, but that the ordinance
indicate the methodology used.
DETERMINATION OF LAND TO Bi•DEDICATED OR FEES TO BE PAID
Through the City's Comprehensive Park Systems Plan and its analysis of
facility needs for residents, the City has generally determined that a
standard of 15 acres of neighborhood and community parks and open space per
population of 1,000 persons is an applicable and valid standard. Approximately
twelve acres of this 15 acre amount shall constitute neighborhood parks and
shall be the minimum standard established by the City.
Therefore, the City shall require dedication, either land or cash, of
sufficient amount which shall meet the standard for neighborhood parks.
Dedication shall be based on density "of residents in the following residential
unit types (1985 census date): 1
• Single family - 3.5
Duplex - 2.8
Townhouse & Quads - 2.1
Multiple - - 1.9
LAND DEDICATION
In brief, the City should relate the parks dedication on a more equitable
basis based on number of residents per type of unit, utilizing the City's
standard for park acreage.
Based on the number of persons per residential unit as previously described,
land dedication shall be as follows:
Alternate I
0-1.9 units per acre - 8%
® 2-3.5 units''p'er acre - 10%
3.6-6 units per acre - 12%
6-10 units per acre - 14%
10 + units per acre - Add .5%
(Alternate II)
This alternative would be a calculated dedication utilizing the type of unit
times the number of residents for that unit. This would equal "demand for
parks." This to be multipled by the parkland equivalent per individual .012
to determine the exact amount of land dedication.
EXAMPLE: Developer X intends to develop 40 acres - twenty acres for single
family and 20 acres for apartment. The single family development
will have 3.5 units per acre and the apartment has 11 units an acre
or 70 single family homes and 220 apartments.
70 units X 3.5 people = 245 people x .012 (standard area per person)
= 2.94 acres ., I , .
220 units x 1.9 people = 418 people x .012 (standard area pi
person) = 5.01 acres
TOTAL: 7.95 ACRES
Therefore, the dedication is .012 acre per person.
CASH DEDICATION
It shall be the City's intent to provide for, where land is not a requirement,
a cash dedication fee. This cash dedication shall be based on composite value
of properties within each of the zoning classifications. This value shall be
determined annually by the City upon recommendation of the Advisory Parks &
Recreation Commission. The land value is to be divided by the number of units
per acre to determine the cash fee which shall equal an equivalency of 12
acres per thousand population times the composite fee of properties of similar
zoning values. This formula shall be as follows:
RESIDENTS) UNITS PER
HOUSING TYPE PER UNIT LAND VALUE 100 POPULATION
Single family
3.5
$11,000
= 28 =
Duplex
2.8
13,000
= 35 =
Townhouse/Quads
2.1
15,000
= 47 =
Multiple/Apts
1.9
17,000
= 52 =
REQUIRED CASH EQ.
(ACREAGE X LAND VALUE)
$13,200
$15,600
$18,000
$20,400
ALTERNATE II:
CASH (CASH EQ. UNITS)
$1 = $471.00 single family
28
$15,600 = $445.00 duplex
35
$18,000 = $382.00 townhouse/quad.
47
$207400 = $392.00 apts.
52
Similar to the alternate being provided in the land dedication, this would be
a cash equivalent per person.
EXAMPLE: 20 single family homes x 3.5 people x .012 acres x $11,000 (values
of property per acre) = .84 x $11,000 = $924.00
DISCUSSION
Alternate II in the proposed land dedication holds constant the value of
property to be dedicated with each plat. Based on 12 acres per thousand
residents, this is the equivalent of .012 acres per person. Upholding this
value constant for each individual, it is quite easy to calculate land
dedication. One will only need to take the type of living unit being proposed
times residents per unit times the .012 factor to determine the acreage to be
dedicated. On the surface, this constant value of land per person seems most
equitable. The fallacy with this formula, however is that it does not take
into recognition that single family dwellings are likely to have more children
�7
4
E
Ll
who are generally more consumptive of parks. Consequently, it would seem that
constant value of parkland person is biased against the multiple (or for
single family) by requiring the same amount of land for adults as for children
from single family homes.
Alternate I under "Land Dedication" takes into consideration, at least to some
degree, that single family residents are generally more consumptive of parks
than multiple family residents. Consequently, even though there is an
escalating percentage of land dedication based on the units per acre, this
percentage is still less than the straight .012 acres per person.
The increasing land dedication percentage seems much more fair than the
straight 10% land dedication regardless of units per acre.
CASH DEDICATION
The cash dedication calculation is ver. similar to that which is being used
currently other than the fact that it h s been updated based on residents per
• unit. For example, under the existing barks dedication policy, single family
is currently allocated for residents per unit and consequently, 25 units per
100 population. This has now been changed to 3.5 residents per unit and 28
units per 100 population. The other value change has been that the City is
using 12 acres per 1,000 population as its standard. Utilizing this new
standard of 1.2 acres per 100 population times the land value of $11,000 per
acre, the required cash equivalent is $13,200. This figure, when divided by
the 28 units per 100 population, equals the cash equivalency of $471.00 per
unit.
The proposed cash dedication takes into consideration that land values
escalate with each type of housing unit. Currently, multiple family units are
paying their cash dedication based on land values for single family versus
land values for multiple. Under the current plan, there may be inequities
between similar developers where one is providing a land dedication from a
multiple dwelling area versus a cash dedication. Obviously, the cash
dedication is significantly less expensive for a developer to provide than the
• land dedication, particularly since that cash dedication is now currently
calculated on single family land values while the land dedication is obviously
of higher value.
It is improbable that an ordinance containing land and cash dedications is
going to be completely equitable and without flaw. However, any
recalculations, computations and variations should attempt to continue to be
fair and equitable as is possible both to the City and developer as well as
between developers.
Under Alternate I for cash dedication, the table shows the result of
escalating land values based on units per acre. You will note that in the
multiple apartment dwellings using land values of $17,000 per acre, the cash
equivalant would be $392.00. This would be an increase of $92.00 from the
1986 adjusted fee of $300.00. However, noting that the parks dedication
requirement could provide credit for on-site amenities provided by apartment
developers, this fee could be reduced for on-site amenities. Those developers
that provide tennis courts, swimming pools or other amenities with their
apartment units could be credited up to the 25% reduction in the cash
dedication. This would reduce the $392.00 dedication to $294.00 per unit.
Those apartment developers who fail to provide any amenities on-site, thereby
probably increasing the demand for park usage by apartment dwellers beyond the
norm, would be paying the full $392.00 per unit. Essentially this provides
greater flexibility for the City by providing credit against a cash dedication
and is closer to the value of the property upon which they are developing. 1`
Industrial/commercial dedication requirements shall remain as is. It appears
that this dedication requirement and verbage should be sufficient to cover any
contingencies associated with this dedication. However, this portion of the
ordinance should contain and provide for updating of the cost per acre by
resolution. This would allow the City to continue as it has in the past, but
would formally recognize the process.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
In reviewing what other communities have done with their parks dedication
requirements, it is interesting to note that for example, Blaine has included
the cost for development of park facilities as part of their park dedication
fees and included it in their calculation. The cities of Eden Prairie and
Plymouth are doing likewise. State tatutes do not address the cost for
development of facilities, although it seems clear that the intent of the
state statute was to not require existing properties to pay more as a result •
of increased development. Therefore, a reasonable portion of development
construction could be construed as being part of a parks dedication
requirement.
Most communities do not provide for credit for parkland within easements or if
part of a flood plain. Eagan's ordinance provides for this. It is this
writer's opinion that because the City has a significant number of ponding
areas utilized for storm water basins and because the City requires these for
storm ponding easements from the developer, it appears that where parkland is
also taken, partial credit should be given. Again this is an issue for
discussion and review, but to do otherwise as a double taking of property.
Several communities have "a savings clause" within their ordinance. The
savings clause is simply a requirement that where the City has indicated a
future park and the developer provides required parkland dedication and the
park space needed is greater that the developer is required to set aside, the •
additional property be set aside for up to one year in order to allow the City
to purchase this additional land. The savings clause establishes a procedure
and price for the property and is typically tied to the City's current fair
market valuation for single family zoned property. This writer would strongly
recommend that such provision be included within the parks dedication or
zoning ordinance.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION:
To review the staff report regarding park dedication, to accept or refuse, to
recommend/not recommend it being sent to the City Council.
Respectfully s bmi ed,
Director of Parks & Recreation
KV/js
N
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page :our
E. CABLE COMMISSION
Burnsville/Eagan Cable Administrator -Mr. Ralph Campbell will be
present to answer any questions the City Council might have regard-
ing Cable operations. The Cable Commission is spending a great.
deal of time analyzing all facets of the proposed Group W sale
and as additional information is available it will be shared with
the City Council.
V0
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Five
Memo
City Council Meeting
There are twelve (12) items
Items requiring one (1) motion
Council wishes to discuss any
those items should be removed
under Additional Items unless
on the agenda referred to as Consent
by the City Council. If the City
of the items in further detail,
from the Consent Agenda and placed
the discussion required is brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSE
A. Contractor License --Attached on page is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who have been Bele ted and retained
as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside
within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from
other municipalities or their client permit applications are
awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
contractor licenses as presented.
ai
To approve the list of
•
11
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
1. M.A. MORTENSON CO
2. PIETSCH CONSTRUCTION CO
3. DOUG SPEEDLING BUILDERS
4. SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION CO
5. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC
®
1.
AMY & JACK HARDIN/TOM LOGELIN
BEATING/VENTILATING
1.
MERIT HVAC INC
2.
METRO AIR
3.
NORTHWESTERN SERVICE INC ;-
4.
S & L HEATING CO
5.
SWANSON PLBG & HTG INC
PLUMBING
1.
AAA COOP PLBG & HTG
®
2.
MURR PLUMBING - APPLE VALLEY
3.
BRUCE NELSON PLBG & HTG
4. NYBO-PETERSON PLUMBING
5. VALLEY PLUMBING CO
WATER SOFTENER
1. MINNESOTA WATER TREATMENT INC
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Six
Memo
City Council Meeting
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
There are four (4) personnel items to be.. given consideration:
1. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Official action at the February 4, 1986
City Council meeting, Nancy Graves was appointed to fill a four
hour clerk typist vacancy in the Typing Pool. The City has been
contacted by Ms. Graves, she has indicated that she has decided
to accept another job offer, rather then that from the City.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
To acknowledge
the notifica-
tion by
Nancy Graves that she would
not be accepting
the position
of Clerk
Typist with the City.
2. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Interviews and testing were conducted
by Administrative Secretary Finnegan and Administrative Assistant
Duffy in order, to fill the vacant 6 hour position in the Typing
Pool for Administration. It is their recommendation that Helga
Brock be appointed to fill this vacancy. The effective starting
date for Ms. Brock would be February 10, 1986. Ms. Brock has already
successfully completed the City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Helga Brock as part-time Clerk Typist (6 hours) for the Typing
Pool in Administration, the appointment to be effective February
10, 1986.
3. Chief Mechanic/Shop Supervisor-- After screening the approxi-
mately 75 applications for this position, six finalists were tested
and interviewed by Director of Public Works -Colbert and Superinten-
dent of Streets and Equipment Erhart on Friday, January 31. It
is their recommendation that Thomas Streefland be appointed to
fill this newly created position. The appointment would be effec-
tive March 10, 1986. Mr. Streefland has already successfully
completed the City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Thomas Streefland as Chief Mechanic/Shop Supervisor, the appoint-
ment to be effective March 10, 1986.
4. Clerk Typist -Parks and Recreation/Protective Inspections--
After screening the approximately 35 applications for this posi-
tion, six applicants were tested and interviewed by Director of
Parks and Recreation Vraa, Park Planner Sullivan and Administrative
Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Mary Weathers
-::7,3
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
be appointed to fill this position. The appointment would be
contingent upon successful completion of the City"s physical
examination requirement and would be effective February 24, 1986.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Mary Weathers as Clerk Typist for the Parks and Recreation/Pro-
tective Inspections Departments', the appointment to be effective
February 24, 1986, and contingent upon successful completion of
the City's physical examination requirement.
E
a,�z
•
0
Agenda Information
February 18, 1985,
Page Eight
Memo
City Council Meeting
CORRECTION OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
C. Correction of March 5, 1985, City Council Minutes --In reviewing
the March 5, 1985, City Council minutes it was realized that the
contract number is in error for Consent Agenda item number 7,
describing the Well Site #5 contract final payment. The contract
referred to in that agenda item should be 83-18 and not 84-18.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Correct the March 5, 1985,.
City Council minutes by "changing consent item number 7 to read
Contract 83-18 instead of 84-18.
a�
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Maeting
Page Nine
CONTRACT 84-13
FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE
D. Contract 84-13, Final Payment/Acceptance, Water Booster
Station --We have received a request for final payment from our
consulting engineering firm along with a certification that the
project has been completed in compliance with city approved plans
and specifications. All final inspections have been performed
by representatives of the Public Works Department resulting in
their favorable recommendation. This water booster station was
constructed at the intersection of Lexington and Diffley Roads
and helps to provide an alternate _source of water to our high
• pressure system.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 10th and
final payment for Contract 84-13 (water booster station) in the
amount of $9,060.12 to A a K Construction Incorporated and to
accept this facility for perpetual maintenance.
PROJECT 42.7, RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING
E. Project 427, _Resolution Restricting Parking (Yankee Doodle
Road, T.H. 13 to Federal Drive)-- Due to the fact that the proposed
reconstruction of this segment of Yankee Doodle Road qualifies
for Municipal State Aid Funding, it is necessary for the City
to pass a formal resolution prohibiting on street parking along
this segment. Enclosed on pagey is a resolution that
must be approved by Council before State Aid will approve the
final design plans which is necessary to obtain their funding
assistance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution
prohibiting on -street parking on Yankee Doodle Road for the Project
427 reconstruction and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents..
M
RESOLUTION
Relating to Parking Restrictions On
S.A.P. 195-120-01 from Trunk Highway No. 13
to Federal Drive
in the City of Eagan Minnesota.
THIS RESOLUTION, passed this day of
by the City of Eagan in Dakota
County, Minnesota
The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City",
® WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 120
Yankee Doodle Road from Trunk Highway No. 13
to Federal Drive
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for
parking on both sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a
Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain
parking restrictions, and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid
project in the "City", has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY.RESOLVED:
That the "City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on
the north and south side of MSAS 120 (Yankee Doodle Road)
at all times.
Dated this day of , 19 .
-ATTEST: City of Eagan , Minnesota. ---,-
City
d7
BY
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
PROJECT 467, FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING
F. Project 467, Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize Public Hearing
(Wescott Road - Lexington to 1/2 Mile East) --In response to a
petition received from the developers of the proposed Greensboro
Addition (Gabbert Development) and the Lexington Square develop-
ment (Northland Mortgage Company), the Council authorized the
preparation of the feasibility report to upgrade that portion
of Wescott Road from Lexington Avenue to � mile east (power line
corridor). This feasibility report has now been completed and
is being presented to the Council for their consideration for
scheduling a public hearing to receive formal public input.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 467 (Wescott Road - Lexington to � mile east)
and schedule a public hearing to be held March 18, 1986.
CONTRACT 85-02, FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE, PEACEFUL HEIGHTS
G. Contract 85-02, Final Payment/Acceptance, Peaceful Heights
(Streets and Utilities): We have received a request for final
payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certi-
fication of compliance with City approved plans and specifications.
All final inspections have been performed by representatives of
the Public Works Department and is subsequently being recommended
for favorable consideration and perpetual maintenance.
. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 4th and
final payment for Contract 85-02 (Peaceful Heights Addition) in
the amount of $9,571.67 to Lake Area Utility Contracting Inc.
and to accept the project for perpetual maintenance.
CONTRACT 84-08, FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE
WESTBURY AND LEXINGTON SQUARE
H. Contract 84-08, Final Payment/Acceptance, Westbury & Lexington
Square (Streets & Utilities) --We have received a request for final
payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certifi-
cation of compliance with City approved plans and specifications.
All final inspections have been performed by representatives of
the 'Public Works Department and it is recommended for favorable
consideration and perpetual maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 7th and
final payment for Contract 84-08 (Westbury and Lexington Square
Additions) in the amount of $32,578.21 to Lametti and Sons Inc.
and to accept the project for perpetual maintenance.
R
Agenda Information Memo
February 18,, 1986,.City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
CONTRACT 85-3/SLATERS ACRES - STREETS & UTILITIES
I. Contract 85-3, Change Orderr #1, Slaters Acres (Streets
& Utilities) --In response to requests received from various
property owners during the construction of streets and utilities
servicing the Slaters Acres subdivision, two changes were incor-
porated in the plans resulting in additional cost identified
as follows:
PART A.
In order to maintain maximum
future development of the
west of Storland Road (Jack
owner requested the sanitary
Acres to be constructed 4 feet
(Add $6,900)
PART B:
flexibility for the potential
unplatted property south and
Hilla property), that property
sewer extension from Slaters
lower than originally proposed.
Due to the excessive driveway slope to the existing houses
located at the south end of James Court, these property
owners requested a special driveway section to facilitate
their ability to get a running start up their driveway
in the winter time without incurring a bump at the curb
and gutter section in front of their driveway. Subsequently,
the existing curb and gutter section was removed and replaced
with a more accessible driveway approach apron. (Add $2,770.)
All costs associated with both parts of this change order will
be :assessed against the benefited properties as a part of this
contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change order
#1 to Contract 8'5-3 (Slaters Acres) in the amount of $9,670.21
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
Zq
•
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Twelve
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 85-7/EAGANDALE/LEMAY LAKE
J. Contract 85-07, Change Order #1, Eagandale/Lemay Lake (Streets
and Utilities)--Th-is contract provided for the installation
of streets and utilities to service the Eagandale/Lemay Lake
1st Addition apartment complex southwest of Lone Oak Road and
I -35E. During the construction of the utilities, it was necessary
to initiate additional work in response to concerns expressed
by adjacent property owners and at the request of the developer
as follows:
PART A:
Due to the construction of the required landscaped berm
along the west portion of this property adjacent to the
Poppler Addition, it is necessary to construct a storm sewer
catch -basin inlet to handle the drainage blocked by this berm
construction. Upon completion, the location of the catch
basin inlet was not satisfactory to Mr. Poppler and was
subsequently relocated per his request. (Add ,$1,679.40)
71e&i1e1F
Due to the fact that several of the utilities were located
within parking lot and private drive areas, the final adjust-
ment of the manhole and gate valve structures were assumed to
be performed privately by the developer as a part of their
parking lot and driveway construction. However, at the
specific request of the developer, the. City performed these
• final adjustments under the City Contract. (Add $1,605.85)
The costs associated with both portions of this change order will
be assessed against the Eagandale/Lemay Lake subdivision in accor•-
dance with the developer's request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change. order #1
to Contract 815-7 (Eagandale/Lemay Lake Addition) in the amount of
$3,285.25 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
'a
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
PROJECT 470/GREENSBORO ADDITION
K. Project 470, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report
Greensboro Addition) --The staff has received a petition requesting
the preparation of a feasibility report along with simultaneous
preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the installa-
tion of streets and utilities necessary to service the proposed
Greensboro Addition which is being considered for preliminary
plat approval later on the agenda. As a part of this petition,
the developer has agreed to guarantee all costs associated with
preparation of this report, plans and specifications if for
some reason the project is not approved at the time of the public
hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive a petition
for Project 470 (Greensboro Addition) and authorize the preparation
of a feasibility report, plans and specifications.
PROJECT 471/WEST SERVICE ROAD
L. Project 471, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (West
Service Road - Storm Sewer) --We have received a petition from
a representative of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
requesting the City of Eagan to prepare a feasibility report
along with detailed plans and specifications for the extension
of storm sewer laterals easterly along the West Service Road
from Center Court within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park
to provide storm water service for surface water -run-off fron
the development of Lots 16 - 20, Block 5, of that industrial
para subdivision. Being the owner of all affected lots, they
have waived their right to a public hearing and agreed to guar-
antee all costs associated with the preparation of these reports
if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of
the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To receive the petition
for Project 471 (West Service Road - Storm Sewer) and authorize
the preparation of the feasibility report and detailed plans
and specifications.
31
•
Agenda Information .iemo
February 18, 1985, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
PUBLIIG.. HEAR•I•NGS
PROJECT 460/NICOLS ROAD
A. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road (Streets - Beau
de Rue Drive to Kings ,Road), Continued from February 4, 1986,
Meeting --At the February 4th meeting, the Council held a public
hearing to consider the upgrading of Nicols Road from Beau de
Rue Drive to Kings Road. As a result of comments received from
that public hearing and the discovery of technical errors in
the publication process, the Council continued the public hearing
until February 18. All property owners that were not properly
noticed of the. February 4th meeting have been noticed of this
February 18 meeting. Due to the fact that all property owners
• had an opportunity to attend the February 4 meeting where the
project was discussed in considerable de''lail, the staff will
not repeat the detailed presentation at the February 18 meeting
unless requested to do so.
Considerable comments expressed at the February 4 hearing related
to the proposed four -lane design from Cliff Road to Diffley
Road and the width and location of the proposed eight -foot bitumi-
nous trail along the east side. As a result, the Council requested
staff to investigate the feasibility and related cost savings
associated with reducing the eight -foot bituminous trail to
six feet and to reducing the four -lane, 52 -foot width to a 46 -
foot width street for additional comments and consideration
at the February 18 meeting. Enclosed on pages 3#+ is a schematic
design showing how this reduced street width would accommodate
a present two-lane design with safety/parking shoulders which
could be incorporated into a four -lane segment at critical inter-
sections through proper striping and parking restrictions.
If it is determined that a full, four -lane section is needed
in the future to handle traffic volumes, the intersection design
striping could be extended through the entire length of the
roadway. Although this substandard, four -lane section would
not be able to handle projected future traffic volumes as effici-
ently as a full, 52 -foot,, four -lane section, it would still
be able to serve the primary function of handling greater capaci-
ties than a two -,lane street and providing turn lanes without
affecting through traffic movements.
Reducing the street width to 46 feet would result in an estimated
cost savings of approximately $600,000. In checking with several
bituminous contractors, it was determined that reducing the
trailway width from eight feet to six feet would not result
in any cost savings due to the limitations on present, state-of-
the-art paving equipment. while there would be a cost savings
37-
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Fifteen
:demo
City Council Fleeting
of material, the smaller trail would be higher labor intensive
due to special equipment that would be required which would
eliminate any cost savings.
If this project is to be constructed during 1986, it is important
that this project be approved as soon as possible so that detailed
plans and specifications can be completed and submitted to Munici-
pal State Aid for review and approval (four to six weeks) before
a contract can be awarded. The Public Works Director and Assistant
City Engineer will be available to discuss any additional items
pertaining to this project at the February 18 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 460 (Nicols Road - Streets) and if
approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi- •
cations.
n
U
33
a+s—,r_ _
1 2: _ -�—
_ Z -�
11'
to: t' TAPER
a����mA NO PARKING
Typical 46' Width at Major. Intersections.
PROJECT 460
NICOLS ROAD
46' WIDTH
g Parking/Safety Lane
;4
14 j
g Parking /Safety Lane
A
Striping
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
VACATION OF UTILTIY EASEMENT/NORTHVIEW MEADOWS ADDITION
B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview
Meadows Addition - Continued from February 4, 1986, Meeting) --At
the February 4 meeting, the Council opened the public hearing
to consider the vacation of common lot line- drainage and utility
easements over Lots 1-5, Block 4, Northview Meadows Addition.
The petition to vacate these easements resulted from the developers
request to consolidate these five lots into three lots and to
rededicate the new easements over the newly created lot lines..
However, this public hearing was continued because its approval
is subject to Council concurrence with the replatting of these
• five lots into three new lots which could not be scheduled until
February 18.
•
Therefore, this public hearing item should be continued until
later in the agenda to determine the outcome of the Council"s
consideration of item A under Old Business, revision of the
Northview Meadows preliminary plat.
Enclosed on page 37 is a sketch showing the location of
the easements requested to be vacated.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and to approve/deny the vacation of common lot line drainage and
utility easements over Lots 1-5, Block "4, Northview Meadows
Addition.
34
2v
:Ie are requesting to vacate all of the existin;; draina a and
utility easements within the followin-, descri!)ed lots:
Lot 'l, 2, 3, 4 and 5, hock 'b; :MT:IVI '. 't12A OWS,
accordin to the recorded plat therooi, Dakota County,
71innesota.
DRAINACE AND UTILITY I
EASEMENTS ARE S90WN TWS:
e �e
• �' !• dlh un! s alh¢rwise
ti C
P- 34o.�;j9F fr
---bd a0
i
-?99 48,
been¢ S.ree rn wr e s p��5 . 1 .
indicaled, and adjo;n;� 10/ liras, as )% 11 �ry h
schown and /reel l ees, at own o�njf�Me plo�joinin�Q I yy\�
s6�• /
r � I � � � I 1 0 ,� ? � � �� � •p bb / • DO
,-
L= JL_ �� �a
30 30 i v
017
240.00
IV 0'07'49"e
J
too 41.59,
a -37°00'00"
b tG
'NbL
42 t
4,3>'
6 `3/ • 00
Oa
,hti//hb 3 x-37'0[
/ �Ae
Dv,
e / •1
•\o
•••••••••••••• DE-WOrES CASEMEtUr TO
BC VACAaTBp.
Do 0 too 200
PAPN/C SCALE //t/ FEET 3�
Gal
rr
Q11
6001
rry1
_QQI
'oli.,
r_
_08-7
31.
: Fv
-Z
' lel
�ry yl
""
OI
h
OI
��
gl
�N
•O `I
IN f
it
Ih �I
I
�'
�I
�
��
I
Ih
�
NI
'aA
1pQl
le .k
14 I
151
1
16
17 1
1
11
.60
—o
L 27
198
19
, yo
I .A�
.
240.00
IV 0'07'49"e
J
too 41.59,
a -37°00'00"
b tG
'NbL
42 t
4,3>'
6 `3/ • 00
Oa
,hti//hb 3 x-37'0[
/ �Ae
Dv,
e / •1
•\o
•••••••••••••• DE-WOrES CASEMEtUr TO
BC VACAaTBp.
Do 0 too 200
PAPN/C SCALE //t/ FEET 3�
Gal
rr
Q11
Agenda Information Meno
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seventeen
VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/BLUE GENTIAN ROAD
C: Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue
Gentian Road - Continued from February 4, 1986 Meeting) --In response
to a petition received by the developers of the proposed Robins
Addition, the Council scheduled a public hearing to be held to
consider the vacation of that portion of Blue Gentian Road right-of-
way that remains after the road relocation and realignment,
associated with the construction.of I-494. Enclosed on page
is a copy of the proposed right-of-way vacation description.
This public hearing has been—continued from January 7 and. February
4 due to technical errors in the legal, publication process. All
notices have been sent to all potentially affected utility
companies. As of this date, staff has not received any objections
to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of the described portion of right-of-
way for Blue Gentian Road.
M
/�Vy-E'psSov/ijc�l, ane of
/YW Cor of yEi TATE �n��isfQ
.22
4
8 , 49�
�roPosed
7lioCIO l oid/i� //ire
0� cM1fi�on Grofoi� Rood of Se Z T.ZB P.23
�L yory �
r Crn1 TEAD, �.
� mon �Pc ,`•.
c
r• 1
aDy �o nCQ�YT/,qiy � �, j
9
6j76'�er _ �
RD�oSEo
o N, °
, ki
0
0
Scale
SA-THRE-BERGOUIST, INC. w0A
100 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAY2ATA, MN 55321 `lam r
TELEPHONE 612476.6000 7Y0 o'J
VACATION OF R.O.W.
for ROBINS ADD.
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Agenda Information
February 18, 198:6,
Page Eighteen
Memo
City Council Meeting
PROJECT 411, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
D.. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 411 (Lillian McCarthy -
Trunk Storm Sewer, Continued from February 4, 1986 Meeting) --
On September 17, 1985, the original final assessment hearing was
scheduled for Project 411 which provided for the trunk storm sewer
outlet from Patrick Eagan Park. As a result of that final assess-
ment hearing, a written objection was submitted by the attorney
representing the Lillian McCarthy property on Lexington Avenue.
Subsequently, the final adoption of the final assessments against
the Lillian McCarthy property (parcel #10-02200-010-02) was
continued several times to allow review by the Special Assessment
• Committee which was performed on January 16, 1986_ Due to the
fact that the appellant did not appear at the Special Assessment
Committee meeting, the Council requested that formal notification
be sent to Lillian McCarthy informing her that the Council will
give formal consideration to this continued final assessment hearing
at the February 18 meeting.
Although the property incorporates 3.91 acres, only 1.5 acres
were assessed at the agricultural/single family rate due to the
"large lot" credit allocated to this parcel. All drainage from this
property directly enters Patrick Eagan Park where the storm sewer
system was installed. The location of this parcel in relationship
to the improvements under 411 and a topogra hic map confirming
directional drainage is enclosed on pages / through ��.
for the Council's information and review. The Special Assessment
Committee recommended that the assessment be reaffirmed as
• originally proposed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the final assessment for Project 411 to the Lillian
McCarthy property (parcel #10-02200-010-02) and, if approved,
authorize certification to Dakota County for collection.
110
El
c TJ
X
0
. JEX- LIFT - FT STA. 14
JP -II
F.K
—J,
-L2
HI L 'Z
HILLTOP
A HL 0
TOF
AZA EAGIti
PL
0 R T H
1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
PATRICK EAGAN PARK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BIRCH PARK ADDITION Consulting Engineers
STORM SEWER LAYOUT St. Paul, Minn.
Date: JUNE, 1984 PROJECT
POND JP -6, 7, 8, 9, 10 R, A7, 8 49 NO.
Agenda Information
February 18; 1985,
Page tlineteen
Memo
City Council fleeting
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT
LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK 1. KNOB HILL OF EAGAN
E. Public Hearing, Vacation of Utility Easement for Lots 1 and
2, Block 1, Knob Hill of Eagan --On January 21, the Council received
a petition requesting the vacation of a portion of a common lot
line drainage and utility easement for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Knob Hill of Ea an as identified by the map and description enclosed
on pages �7 through All notices have been sent
to all potentially affected utility companies and published in
the legal newspaper. As of this date, staff has not received
any comments or objections to this proposed vacation. This
• requested easement vacation is necessitated by the requirement
of the mortgage company financing one of the townhouses being
constructed where the concrete patio encroaches into the existing
easement.
11
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of the common lot line drainage
and utility easement over Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Knob Hill of
Eagan.
i�5
•
•1
A
0
..- •y0O411.05
IN 00' 00" E 15 T 1
350.27
1 301
0 1,42 90 N79°58 27'rE /"� -1 Q u
-50
PROPOSED v ri� CY/°in°fe \ \ o
VAC.AT1oN Y 45o(v�i�'cose�'en� 1 \` r ;\\� /r
I T13 \
PROPOSED
DEDIC.AT1oN
I //•lIzX
30
2 r
63
d ral'(1a9
iZ7 N7203
� Nlk
v'9i
Lo
30 30
'.21 N
O i0
Op /O
0
IN /N m O
0
• v
/ X10 0.
3p�U)
30 / .e-Ufi/ify
T2� r� "
c1e,- -
k 28799_
. • ..,..� 312.99
ra'i,age e`
' O UTLOT
L t-
r4COUNTY STATE
A I D
H I G H
Lo
r7 I
o G
.-
so
Sov1!7 /ire
o�SEy
oFSZ
1.` (ij
_
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ PLANNERS
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 5593700
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOR
VACATING EASEMENTS
IN PLAT OF KNOB HILL
EAGAN
All that part of Lot 1, Block--I—,KNOB HILL OF EAGAN, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota lying -Northerly of the following.
described line:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence on an assumed
bearing of South 00 degrees 45 minutes 33 seconds East, along the west line
of said Lot 1 a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning of said
line; thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 27 seconds East 128.71 feet to the
northeasterly line of said Lot l and there terminating; except the west
30.00 feet thereof.
Job No. 6293
December 6, 1985
ED
Printed on recycled paper
i
ED
Printed on recycled paper
E
Agenda Information .1eno
February 18, 1985, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISION/NORTHVIEW MEADOWS
A. Preliminary Plat Revision for Northview Meadows --At the last
regular City Council meeting there was discussion regarding a
preliminary plat revision for Northview Meadows. Questions were
raised regarding the legal procedure for processing a preliminary
plat revision. According to the City Attorney's office a waiver
of plat or replat requires a public hearing before the Advisory
Planning Commission. A revision to a preliminary plat requires
a notification of the surro nu ding property owners but not a formal
public hearing by the Planning Commission. Therefore, the
preliminary plat revision of Northview Meadows as presented at
the February 4, City Council meeting is in order for consideration,.
For additional information on this item, refer to a memo prepared
by the City Planner enclosed on page(s) - 6'0
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat revision for Northview Meadows as presented.
W
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON REVISION TO THE NORTHVIEW MEADOWS PLAT
Since the February 3, 1986, City Council meeting, City staff has
legally noticed this particular agenda item and has also sent
notice to surrounding residents informing them the applicant is
proposing to revise this plat and to create three (3) lots versus
the five (5) that were originally proposed. Adequate' notice had
not been given previously for this procedure to take place.
In reviewing this revised plat.,- there were two processes the City
could have .used to resolve this issue. The first was to request a
• waiver of plat where legal descriptions would have been changed to
correspond with these new lot lines. However, the legal descrip-
tions were quite lengthy and would be cumbersome to follow in the
future for tracking particular parcels. Staff suggested to the
applicant to revise the plat so a new document would be recorded
showing the new lot configurations with the easements in place.
This is the best solution because the document is recorded
listing the legal description. The problem with the revised
document is that technically it should have taken approximately
four months to replat. To expedite closings and to get the best
document possible for the City, it was discussed among staff as a
way to expedite this process and to resolve a problem that
presently exists. In review of this total process, the only item
that would be affected in the City is the side lot easements, and
the public hearing has been advertised to vacate and relocate in
accordance with this new plan. It was discussed administratively
• that the City could expedite this process and help the developer
meet his time frame for the scheduled closings on the lots where
there are buildings located.
I am in the process of working with the Building Department to
determine how building permits have been -issued on the existing
lots. At the present time, the building officials are sceheduled
for a two-day conference but, hopefully, this information can be
obtained and explained to the Council with a memorandum or verbally
at the February 18 meeting.
If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me
at this office.
M
Cti " planner
DCR/jj
T�
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
<_ - DATE: FEBRUARY 30, 1986
SUBJECT: REVISION TO THE NORTHVIEW MEADOWS FINAL PLAT
Northview Meadows was one of the first small lot subdivisions ._.
platted within the City. The five lots, which the applicant
is requsting to revise into three, have some different circumstances.
Concerning lot 1, located on the corner of South Wescott Hills
Drive and Braddock-Trail,,the builder did not take into account
that South Wescott Hills Drive would require a larger setback
than from a normal residential street. Therefore, the " first
building encroachedinto a portion of another lot to the east
of lot 1. Lots 4 and 5 are presently the location of the old
existing Trapp Farm Homestead. When looking at renovating or.
selling the home as is, it was found to be impossible to add
a garage on the same lot as the existing house. There would
have to be additional. easements or a portion of the lot to the
west would have to be obtained in order to get a driveway around
the west side of the house and still stay within the lot. Since
there are three existing homes and closings are set for two of
the properties, staff is suggesting that a revision to the plat
be allowed in this instance because we are reducing five lots
into three with there being no room for an additional home on
these three lots. In reviewing the requirements of the City,
it has been determined that the only item needed would be to
vacate the public easements on the original lot lines creating
new easements for..these new lots.
The public hearing has been scheduled for February 4, 1986 to •
vacate these easements but the City does not wish to vacate unless
the Council approves the revision to the final plat and establishes
the new easements in accordance with this -revision. The Development
Contract, along with ..all other items for platting, was completed
with the original Northview Meadows final plat. The circumstances
are. unique -but.. because the the changes are minor, it appears
•-that this process would be feasible to expedite the process and
eliminate the extensive paperwork required if we could not modify
the plat in this manner.
Very truly yours,
Dale Runkle/jbd ,.
REVISION TO NORTHVIEW MEADOWS
1 . /
Ato
Si 1
;_ 'i • O
• a
dEe
eda a 1 c n
L_ H
WI..fL wo mum uuw.n _
'kPo'+ r w•• !•el
. a
\(IJI • � L il— 4
r'^ _I____I ____1_ • 0.01111" maNIT FLIM -
e umu all • ! a• I"
Itl..IO YI w IIUW LI
\Ly \
"IN 1 IIII II v111Y u0 - A.L.S. i. JIM
t • Npl.li 1011101 .i II
• \ nn a
IMM m uonlr
II411u 101011E
w n ti!.
0
... u........iiii •
. . I I ...I........... •.
� ..........III ......I. I.... .. �.........
.PPS
....a.LTT
JAMES R.
SHEET E Of 7
LPLeffitL,�Aflr
cA.
--r.r_
a'
f, S
L''
CUY � I
sddimv tti rim, Rim.
•unla m wain l.11re.n
m ••r rae,
Ilr n rlln m
lel lull m I
nn m uami
U mmlltlll
'm PLAT.
REVISION TO NORTHVIEW MEADOW;
DRAINAGE PLAN
I
c
V �%
-
n non unlrr ro nuuco. r.u.. mr nu ..mr,
rw 01 nrort ru noon n .1 or.ueu.n Juar
I
-
-
- eieririii i.vi of iulrini ei mminu 'M all
ll 1i
nr or Jrnul. ml.
uenl, I'M r..Ill, IIID. -
1W
_
w.c. c. r.rm
nuuon ucun
I
r
• ■OPrll la r011• -
I
mmill IIP a• P
• nI W IY
r1Oii!:r�illmi...ern
roercr oa
rooe.r.•rEJAMES
R. HILL, INC.
.us
•�9e1
En•lun / 6nvrm.,.— Z.ra
uo. .r.......0
•
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
PARK CONSULTANT APPOINTMENT
FEE SCHEDULE CONSIDERATION
B. Park Consultant Appointment and Fee Schedule Consideration --
At the January 21, 1986, organizational meeting there was question
regarding the rate schedule that would be charged by Tim Erkkila
since his merger with Westwood Planning and Engineering Company.
Tim Erkkila under the business name of Erkkila and Associates
was hired to prepare the park master plan and work as a consultant
for certain projects that were approved as a part of the park
referendum. Mr. Erkkila has—responded with a letter, see pages
5$ through 53 , that explains his merger with Westwood
Planning and Engineering Company and also the fee schedule that
will be charged during 1986.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
hiring of Westwood Planning and Engineering Company as the City's
park consultant for calendar 1986.
1511
WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
X, -
February 7, 1986
Mr. Tom Hedges, Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Re: Consultation Fees Proposal
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Recently, I submitted a fees schedule for unscheduled park planning and
design services for 1986. I understand some clarification has been
• requested.
ERKKILA & ASSOCIATES MERGER WITH WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING
COMPANY - Originally (since 1981) and for several years following,
Eagan utilized my services through my company known as Erkkila &
Associates. On January 1, 1985, two weeks after issuing my 1985 rate
schedule to you I merged with Westwood Planning and Engineering
Company. Through all of 1985, Westwood Planning & Engineering Company
honored the Erkkila & Associates work arrangement. Essentially, the
11new11 arrangement will be the same as last year except the fee
arrangement changed slightly.
1.
The merger involved the professional personnel of Erkkila & Associates
joining Westwood. My previous personnel (Gordon Anderson and Anne
Deuring) plus two planners of the Westwood's staff came under my
direction. In summary, Eagan had no change of service (myself and my
• old staff) plus additional staff in the area of planning and
engineering. This merger strengthened the park planning and design
services available to the City of Eagan.
2. CHANGE RATES - As identified in my letter proposal of January 9, 1986
there is a change in hourly rates. Gordon.Anderson and Anne Deuring
(original Erkkila & Associates peronnel) charge rates go to $28.50 per
hour from $25.00 per hour. My charge rate becomes $54.00 per hour.
These increases are certainly comparable or better than consulting
fee's the City has with it's other outside personnel and I would
welcome a comparison if necessary. I am a registered Landscape Archi-
tect with 15 years of experience. Anne Deuring is a registered Land-
scape Architect with 7 years of experience, Gordon Anderson is a
graduated Landscape Architect with 9 years of experience. The
increase was overdue and intentially not instituted on January 1, 1985
to ease the perceived transition from the entity of Erkkila &
Associates to Westwood Planning & Engineering Company. I remain the
primary project manager for Eagan Parks work and utilize my experi-
enced personnel (Anne and Gordon) on your work. The larger increase
in my charge rate is not exptected to effect your overall costs sig-
nificantly since 90 percent of your work is done by personnel at the
lower rate.
7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5U26 (612) 5460155 �.Z
3. GENERAL - I believe my historic insight in the development of the
present park system in Eagan gives me a particularly useful position
since no other firm can. This "edge" is not utilized in our pricing of
services to you. We have carefully attempted to price our services
within or below prevailing rates (we are using a 1984 rate table)
because we wish to continue to serve the City of Eagan. Our proposal
is intended to serve the city well by,providing needed services by
experience personnel at the best possible cost.
I hope this letter clarifies our fee's proposal of 1986. Westwood Planning
b Engineering Company is very interested in serving Eagan, through all it's
resources, but specifically through myself and my staff. The name change
to Westwood has done nothing to diminish the quality of services provided
to Eagan. I will be willing to attend a council meeting if necessary to
entertain any further question_ -
Sincerely,
WESTWOOD PLANNING S ENGINEERING COMPANY
d;W&d1a
Tim Erkkila, ASIA
Vice President, Planning
TE: pan
cc: Ken Vraa
S3
LIN
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1985, City Council .Meeting
Page Twenty -Two
GUN CLUB LAKE
WATERSHED APPOINTMENTS
C. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission—
Enclosed on pages &�- through SP` is a letter that was
sent out Tuesday, February 11, as directed by the City Council
seeking interest in the appointment to the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission. Those persons that were given consideration
at the last City Council meeting are: Jim Unker; Mike Beard,
Brad Farnum and Steve Galligan. At the time this memo was prepared
there had not been an indication expressed by any of these persons
• regarding interest in an appointment to the Commission. The City
Administrator will provide further update at the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint three (3) members
to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission of which
one of those persons is proposed to be Tom Colbert, Director of
Public Works.
0
. X141, tl.ifay rani [i
T <i11
lllii .,
U
Recently, appointments were made to several volunteer committees
and commissions that advise the City Council on issues such
as land use planning, parks and recreation, airport noise, cable
television and economic development. It has been the policy
of the City that whenever a new committee or commission is or-
ganized or vacancies occur in one of the standing committees,
those persons who have previously expressed interest in seeking
an appointment are contacted first.
The City has two (2) vacancies. on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission. According to recent State legislation,
each community within the Metropolitan Area is required to enter
into a joint powers agreement establishing a watershed management
organization. The Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission
consists of land area within Eagan, Mendota Heights, and Inver
Grove Heights. Most of the watershed area is located within
the City of Eagan.
• The City Council is considering appointments at the February
18, 1986, meeting. If you are interested in being considered
for an appointment on this commission, please indicate by checking
the appropriate yes or no on the enclosed form and return in
the self-addressed envelope to the attention of the City Admini-
strator. For more information on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission, refer to a copy of a memo that was recently
prepared by the Director of Public Works for consideration by
the City Council.
As always, we appreciate your interest in serving as a volunteer
in our community.
Sinc2rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/kf J'5
THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21109
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
Mayor
'PHONE (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VAC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
February 10, 1986
CoonaaA Members
THOMAS HEDGES
CaryA ministrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
U
Recently, appointments were made to several volunteer committees
and commissions that advise the City Council on issues such
as land use planning, parks and recreation, airport noise, cable
television and economic development. It has been the policy
of the City that whenever a new committee or commission is or-
ganized or vacancies occur in one of the standing committees,
those persons who have previously expressed interest in seeking
an appointment are contacted first.
The City has two (2) vacancies. on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission. According to recent State legislation,
each community within the Metropolitan Area is required to enter
into a joint powers agreement establishing a watershed management
organization. The Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission
consists of land area within Eagan, Mendota Heights, and Inver
Grove Heights. Most of the watershed area is located within
the City of Eagan.
• The City Council is considering appointments at the February
18, 1986, meeting. If you are interested in being considered
for an appointment on this commission, please indicate by checking
the appropriate yes or no on the enclosed form and return in
the self-addressed envelope to the attention of the City Admini-
strator. For more information on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission, refer to a copy of a memo that was recently
prepared by the Director of Public Works for consideration by
the City Council.
As always, we appreciate your interest in serving as a volunteer
in our community.
Sinc2rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/kf J'5
THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
GUN CLUB LAKE
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
Yes, I am interested in serving on the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Commission
No, I am not interested in serving on the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management_Commission but keep my
name on file for vacancies on other Committees/
Commissions.
Please remove my name from consideration for vacancies
on any committees/commissions at this time.
Name
Address
Phone Number
•
--.
•
Agenda Information Memo
February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty-four
GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ---
D. Appointments to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commis-
sion --At the last regular City Council meeting, staff was directed
to prepare additional information regarding the responsibilities
of Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission members. The
City of Eagan is responsible for the appointment of three members
to that watershed management group. It is recommended that
the Director of Public Works be one of those appointments.
According to recent state legislation, each community within
the metropolitan area was required to enter into a Joint Powers
Agreement establishing a Watershed Management Organization (WMO).
This Joint Powers Agreement provided for the establishment of
a Commission to manage the affairs of this WMO. The makeup
of this Commission is to consist of three representatives from
the City of Eagan and two representatives each from Mendota
Heights and Inver Grove Heights. This seven -member Commission
would serve in its capacity through the establishment and adoption
of the WMO's management plan after which Mendota Heights and
Inver Grove Heights would withdraw one member each, leaving
a five -member Commission to manage the ongoing affairs of the
WMO.
The purpose of this WMO is to provide an organization to preserve
and use the natural water storage and retention of the Gun Club
Lake Watershed to:
a. Reduce to the greatest practical extent capital expenditures
necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of runoff.
b. Improve water quality.
c.
Prevent
flooding and
erosion from surface flows.
d.
Promote
ground water
recharge.
e. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water
recreational facilities.
•f. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper manage-
ment of surface water.
g. Carry out- all 'the duties and responsibilities outlined
in Minnesota Statutes 473.875 through 473.883.
Other than the Director of Public Works, the staff does not
have any other recommendations .for representatives to this Commis-
sion. It is anticipated that the Commission will meet monthly
until the WMO's operational and management plan has been completed
and, thereafter, 2-3 times a year for organizational business
-(i.e. budget, capital improvement, permit issuance, etc.)
6
Agenda Information Memo
February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty-five
The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss in
further detail the purpose and responsibilities of the WMO to
help the Council arrive at proper representative appointments.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint three members
to represent the City of Eagan to the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Organization.
16-
C•
Agenda Information
February 18, 1985,
Page Twenty -Three
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/UTILITY BUILDING
NORTHWESTERN BELL
D. Conditional Use Permit for Utility Building, Northwestern
Bell Telephone at Diffley Road/West of Dodd Road --The conditional
use permit for consideration of a utility building located south
of C.R. 30 and west of Dodd Road was continued at the January
21 meeting to allow Northwestern Bell Telephone an opportunity
to consider a site that is more aesthetically pleasing to the
p
neighborhood. Attached on pages � through (0-6 is
a copy of the original report that was submitted for consideration
by the Planning Commission and City Council. According to Mr.
Bob Dokken, it will be possible to move the location of the utility
building further south on the church property. The revised sketch
plan is copied on pages 64 through for your review.
Enclosed on page() (a V is a copy of a letter that was sent
to Northwestern Bell by the City Administrator that addresses
action that was taken by the City Council at the last regular
meeting. This action pertains to the Blackhawk Road site and
a, request that future, planning of utility buildings be more closely
coordinated with the City's Planning Department. It is expected
that Mr. Dokken will be at the City Council meeting on Tuesday
and would like an opportunity to update the City Council on the
status of the Blackhawk Road utility building site.
In addition to the planned sites, Northwestern Bell is considering
two additional sites which are referenced as Site 2 and Site
3.. Enclosed on pages? hrough ZZ are copies of those
site plans and a location map.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
request of Northwestern Bell Telephone Company for a utility build-
ing located on County Road 30, west of Dodd Road and more specifi-
cally property that is owned by the South District Lutheran Church
Missouri Synod.
69
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TELEPHONE UTILITY BUILDINGS
APPLICANT: NORTHWESTERN BELL
LOCATION:
1)
SE ;
of SECTION 17
2)
NWa
of SECTION 25
EXISTING ZONING:
1)
R-3
(TOWNHOUSE)
2)
P.D.
(LEXINGTON SOUTH)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DECEMBER
19, 1985
DATE OF REPORT:
DECEMBER
3, 1985
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for Conditional
Use Permits to allow two separate telephone equipment buildings.
As with previous applications, these buildings will be termination
points for telephone cables from the central office and provide
service to additional customers. Both structures, 16' x 17'/272
square feet will be made of brick and have gabled roofs. There
will be an access drive with 'T' turn arounds.
BUILDING SITE 1: SEa OF SECTION 17
This parcel, part of a 1.73 acre single family lot, is on the
C;4 SE corner of the Robin Lane and Blackhawk Road intersection.
Measuring 60' x 70', this 4200 sq ft site will have access from
Robin Lane. The 14' drive will be bituminous but not have curb
and gutter. City policy is to not require curb/gutter for single
use access.. Building front yard setbacks are shown at 30' and
have Code compliance. The rear and side yard setbacks of 141'
• and 22' respectively are within Code requirements for accessory
structures. The bituminous drive will be 4' from the property
line at the southern most point and no dimension is given from
the Robin Lane property line to the turnaround area.
BUILDING SITE 2: NWe OF SECTION 25
This 60' x 80', 4800 sq ft parcel is on the northwest corner
of the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church property fronting on County
Road 30. The property to the west is the preliminary platted
Sunset 10th Addition. Calvary Memorial Church will be the closest
structure to the subject area. All building setbacks meet Code
compliance requirements. The 14' drive turnaround is set back
11! from the C.R. 30 property line. Other drive setbacks are
within City Code. As with building site 1,_ the bituminous surface
will not require curb and gutter.
NOTE: Both' sites have signed option agreements with the current
land owner and copies are included in the City files.
Site 1 has some existing
applicant will provide a
to building permit issuance
trees but
landscape
60
Site 2 has no trees. The
plan for Staff review prior
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TELEPHONE UTILITY BUILDINGS
DECEMBER 19, 1985
Page 2 \ :?
If approved, the Conditional Use Permits shall be subject to
landscape plan approval by Staff and all other applicable ordi-
nances.
•
l
PROPOS[=. �
oi3iNANS
w
1
v
,4N
rn (77% T
APC Minutes f,
December 19, 1985
3. That liquor shall be sold only in conjunction with the sale and
consumption of food on the premises.
All voted yea.
VILLAGE BUILDERS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN
Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing upon the application of
Village Builders for a pylon sign located west of Highway 413 and south of
Shawnee Road, for AL1 -American Self Storage. City Planner Runkle described
the proposed two-sided interior lighted sign which would measure 8 feet by 9
feet with an overall height not to exceed 27 feet. It appeared that there
were no adjacent lots that were as yet undeveloped that would be affected by
the placement of a sign, as far as their own signage. Harrison moved, Wold
seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a
pylon sign for AL1 -American Self Storage, west of Highway #13 and south of
Shawnee Road, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot be paid.
2. That all other applicable ordinances be complied with.
3. That the sign not deviate from the specifications presented to staff.
All voted in favor.
NORTHWESTERN BELL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
TELEPHONE UTILITY BUILDINGS
Chairman Hall then called the hearing upon the request of Northwestern
Bell for two conditional use permits for two separate telephone equipment
buildings, one located at the southeast corner of Robin Lane and Blackhawk
Road and the other at the northwest corner of the Missouri Synod Lutheran
Church property fronting on County Road 30. Dale Runkle described the
structures as being identical to existing structures in the City of Eagan,
consisting of brick with gabled roofs and access drives with 'T' turn arounds.
Mr. Bob Docken, the realtor representing Northwestern Bell and in charge of
locating the site described, was present to describe the proposals in greater
detail. He indicated that he had talked to neighboring homeowners that did
not object to the facilities. Mr. Robert Saleck of 3741 Blackhawk Road did
appear to object to the application. His home is located north of Robin Lane
and north of the house across Robin Lane and directly north of the proposed
site. It was pointed out that there had been a lack of landscaping on
previous such facilities. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to
'recommend approval of the conditional use permits, subject to a landscape plan
approved by staff and all other applicable ordinances. All voted in favor.
Harrison then moved, Wilkins. seconded the motion to recommend that the
City 'contact Northwestern Bell in regard to the landscaping of all such
facilities as described in the above conditional use permit request. :All
C voted in favor.
r=te
0
•
/
lr
.��_
ft ,l I
:t,. ,�!P fV:f rllr
a.s•,i
{ .
fi
•
S
� -.
00
c i � l luaij ` v i5 y„r
I..p.
•
.,. , . , 5
,•,
}
I c == v,,. EKY
-
r`ol
.ower
I
.-
_
-
q�4L.
,
—v�iEc,ATv
4
l / r
i
LANDSCAPE.
PLAN
PRpPossD
PLybR
; :r
92rro
.
CWM&15 7I4,-
,
6tJILDItJL1_-
�L g14 S' f .
,. 4 �
a�
�
I-.
Giyy 1
ff i�
Y•
14 l
a:" S I
'�
♦'.iTd 5
yet' 'y�
/
928
fi
S
� -.
c i � l luaij ` v i5 y„r
•
.,. , . , 5
,•,
}
I c == v,,. EKY
4
l / r
LANDSCAPE.
PLAN
i
i
• �—EpC�E"off 61TLJMINouS _:
3 0 _ 918 I'� °i10 _ 921
\ �� N
— — ql4 — •� � e�,�
0
--
FRO"tp FZ1W LIN2
.1924 / 92er /
:9`_:
qjo o
0 oSED �+ 931
6;1 -----
y
m
�7
NORTHWES-TERN BELL..IELI
r
�7
NORTHWES-TERN BELL..IELI
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 M�,
PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
February 10, 1986 MCELLISON
"THEODORE WACHTER"
ALMA FITZLOFF, ASST MGR REAL ESTATE THOMAS
em HEDGES
S
NORTHWESTERN BELL ❑N AaminBtrow
70 W 4TH ST, RM 1C EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
ST PAUL MN 55102 ONCle`"
Re: Proposed Switching Station on Blackhawk Road
And Policy for Future Site Selections
Dear Ms. Fitzloff:
• In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a
regular meeting held on Tuesday, February 4, 1986, there was
direction given to the Director of Parks & Recreation to further
work with representatives of Northwestern Bell to locate the
Blackhawk Road switching station in the proposed Blue Cross Park
adjacent to Blue Cross Road. It is the City's intention to close
on the Blue Cross parkland and develop Blue Cross Park during
1986. Members of the City Council feel it is in the best interest
of Eagan to work together on siting a building in Blue Cross Park.
It is my understanding that Northwestern Bell has given considera-
tion to the abandonment of that location. However, as stated, we
hope you will continue reviewing alternatives which include further
discussion with our Director of Parks and Recreation, Mr. Ken
Vraa, of the Blue Cross Park site.
• The City Council also included in the aforementioned motion the
suggestion of a policy that Northwestern Bell contact the City
Planning Department in the future before real estate negotiations
commence regarding the siting of another switching station. It is
important to the City Council that the staff be involved in the
planning process regarding any future site --selections which could .
eliminate neighborhood controversy and enhance site sensitivity.
Please coordinate these efforts with Mr. Dale Runkle, our City
Planner.
Again, for additional information
Road switching station, contact
selections, contact Dale Runkle,
454-8100.
or action regarding the Blackhawk
Mr. Ken Vraa, or for future site
both of whom can be reached at
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedge
City Administrator
cc: Ken Vraa, Dir of Parks & Recreation/Dale Runkle, City Planner
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
kA1K1w1
Il� 6 51
N
Agenda Information
February 16, 1986,.
Page Twenty -Four
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY_P.LAT AND REZONING/GREENSBORO
E. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single -Family Lots on 40 Acres and
a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) --
The City Council reviewed rezoning and preliminary plat applications
for the Greensboro project as submitted by Dave Gabbert at the
February 4, 1986 meeting. Direction was given to the developer
toeliminatethe cul-de-sac by causing that street to become a
through street and further that all lots be increased in size
to meet the 12,000 square foot minimums. For a copy of the revised
preliminary plat and comments by the City Planning Department
refer to .pages��3 through For a copy of the
information that w s submitted with the last City Council packet
refer to pages 177 through 189 of the February 4 Agenda Information
Memo. A question was raised at the last City Council meeting
regarding suitable zoning if all lots were to be 12,000 square
feet. Whether R-1 or Planned Development zoning is allowed for
this development the R-1 standards, as set forth in the zoning
Ordinance, can be enforced,. Since the application for rezoning
was from an A to PD, the Development Agreement would state that
all development criteria must meet R -1 -requirements as set forth
in the City Zoning Ordinance. A change to the R-1 zoning would
require a new public hearing before the Planning Commission during
March, delaying any further consideration on the preliminary plat
until the first meeting in April.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny
rezoning from A to PD with the requirement in the Development
® Agreement that all R-1 standards be met according to the Zoning, -
Ordinance. 2) To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled
Greensboro Addition.
7�_
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: GREENSBORO REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT
It is our understanding at the February 4, 1986,.City Council
meeting that the plat is still going to proceed under the Planned
Development zoning designation. However, all lots still must meet
the 12,000 sq. ft. criteria. Therefore, a Planned Development
Agreement will also be required for this development. The applicant
has resubmitted the site plan showing the northern cul-de-sac
removed, 60 ft. right-of-ways and lots which were to meet 12,000
sq. ft. In a quick review, staff has found one lot which does
•not meet the 12,000 sq. ft. criteria. While in this review, it
should be pointed out that all lots shall meet 85 ft. lot width at
the 30 ft. setback and a minimum of 12,000 sq. ft. In review of
this plan, it appears there is adequate room to shift lot lines
and allow the one lot to increase square footage up to the 12,000
sq. ft.
The attached exhibit was received late and is not as clear as what
we would like to present to the City Council. Staff will work
with the exhibit on an overhead Tuesday which will make the
exhibit more legible for the presentation. The conditions still
shall apply which were in the staff report for the original plat.
If anyone has any questions or would like additional information
on this development, please contact me at City Hall.
• 122
Pla er
DCR/j j
73
Preliminary Plat Of:
GREENSBORO
DELIMAR H. SCHWANZ
LAND SURVEYORS INC
Raa:9.rM Under Lav$ of The Stale of M:nne3oln
14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55066 PHONE,612 423-1769
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
.__Owner: Edmund Meisinger Jr. etal.
Developer: Gabbert Development, Inc.
1955 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, Mn. 55391
PPesent Zoning: Agriculture
Proposed Zoning: R-1 Single Family
Legal Description:
The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township
27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota.
AREAS.
1 Total Plat - 40.23 Acres
2 All individual lots and outlots - 34.73 Ac.
3 Public right-of-way - 5.50 Ac.
4 Park Land - 0
DENS2TY' CALCULATIONS:
1) Units per acre for total plat - I.99
2 Units per acre for total plat lees right-of-way - 2.37
3 Units per acre for total plat less right-of-way and park land
combined - 2.30
Proposed drainage and utility. easements to be 10 feet in width and •
adjoining street and 5 feet in width and adjoining side and rear lot
lines unless otherwise shown.
Prepared by: Delmar H. Schwanz
Land Surveyors, Inc.
14750 South Robert Tr.
Rosemount, Mn. 55068
Date of preparation: November 27, 1985.
Revised February 13, 1986
r
119 " A
MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 8625
l.�
EJ I PREUM1RAgr'FI_AT�4� .G ENSBOR '%
I �I ! ( • 1 ,p� � � r i , y� 1 1 ( I � I
v 15,Is Ifi t. p_
.`!, 1� 1 -�.f• I •�. 1 r ,� , ILII
- per- 1 / .. �,I Y , !/ � 1'� p q•, � � `!_� � LD�I� -I IfJ � :�
LE IWCH�CqFE T
t n.. ,, \ /
T, rl 111•
� \� = (( �Iri '. �\ 110•, ..I I E 1\ � of m.lfi � \�� � � i� •R 9 \\\ ` / 1� li
I,12 01 ���\.1;' 1
601 Lx'I
\l I/
III • • 1 \ . �"/ J/ /� - ' ' � / 9 -- - ' �11; `' I�
?r 1 •• I E �1 \\,\ -. II I ' �/.ii. p/ � � /,/ � �( 41 � -1 f Ef -19 I � it .) �� III 12°. I�� 2
ERE.RED Rr , / I <. � �', t � � 11 1 \� I r ( / -'� .' l/ / /, � •. I �, � 1 - .
1\ I. OELWR H. UHW4
111-'1� J Lud auRvf(roRe IHc. \\ , E ! /I • r' / �D' a I / ' I
9 ^ R. ! I' ` '"( twP 20 !, / �II 134•, 1.
_4
1�.. I '/' E1� 1 1�1� 1 nl Ii ' 1 v Irl l• E'21 �rt.ii .-. •Ih
to EI 2 -.. -E III1 �/ ' ` 1 II',u (. \,1 22
���/,I -''1• l�rl�llal \p �• /yI /` 2
6 / \ a ''e
_ ; •� <. i p I _�/ I '`.f e IJ�/ Ill '1�4 �1.•Q 8.3�'.
��e�
al
WESCOTT __ - L - _ E ROAD
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
CONTRACT 85-21, CONCEPT DESIGN APPROVAL (MAINTENANCE GARAGE)
F. Contract 85-21, Concept Design Approval (Maintenance Garage
Expansion) --During the past 2-3 months, the staff has held a series
of design consideration meetings with the architect to arrive
at a concept design for the new expansion and remodeling of the
Maintenance Garage Facility. Through input from representatives
of the Public Works and Parks Maintenance operations, the consultant
has prepared this final concept design layout which should receive
formal Council approval before proceeding with the detailed design
phase associated with plans—and specifications and final budget
estimates. Enclosed on pages ___ZZ tthrough ,Q is informa-
tion pertaining to this final concept design as provided by Bohrman
IF Architects. This information and a three dimensional scale model
will be reviewed and discussed by the architect to answer any
questions the Council may have at this point in the design process.
The staff is very pleased and quite excited with the architectural
design that has been incorporated into this Maintenance Facility
which we feel will greatly minimize the potential negative impact
that might be associated with this facility being surrounded by
residentially zoned property.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify the concept
design for the proposed Maintenance Garage expansion and if
approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi-
cations.
•
74�
Agenda Information
February 18., 1980,
Page Twenty -Six
Memo
City Council Mee"ing
REVIEW OF ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE POLICY
A. Review of On -Sale Liquor License Policy --At the last regular
City Council meeting there were questions raised about current
regulatory language in the City Code that requires all on -sale
liquor licenses to meet a $200,000 valuation test. The City staff
was directed to review various options for the City Council to
consider to better regulate the issuance of on -sale liquor licenses.
The City staff has reviewed valuation, seating capacity, food/
liquor ratio, geographic locations and the concept of reserving
• certain licenses. 'These alternatives are discussed in a memo
prepared by Administrat've Assistant Witt and is enclosed on pages
through There are .so many choices for the
C tC t ncil to consider regarding the regulation of on -sale liquor
licenses. Once a general discussion and further direction is
given, the City staff will be able to firm up a policy for
consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To review changes to the
on -sale liquor license policy and direct the City staff to draft
specific language for policy change.
rvL]
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1986
SUBJECT: ON -SALE LIQUOR
By State statute, the City of Eagan is allowed 18 on -sale liquor
licenses until the population reaches 45,000. For each 2,-500
increase thereafter, another license may be issued. There are
currently nine active licenses in Eagan and their locations are
shown on the map. The first license was issued in 1973, two in
1974, one each in 1976 and 1979, three in 1982 and one in 1983.
A survey of metro area communities was undertaken and the results
are shown on the chart. Staff learned that several variables
could be involved in the issuing of licenses. Various options to
regulate issuance of licenses include:
1. Valuation: If valuation is used, the term must be defined as
to what is and what is not included. Eagan requires an
appraised value of $200,000 as to the building or portion of
building associated with liquor sales. Staff has assumed
that this refers to the County Assessor's figure of estimated
market value and does not include land or any items such as
fixtures or equipment not included by the Assessor.
Burnsville requires a $1,000,000 valuation which includes
fees, site development, construction costs, utilities,
furnishings and fixtures, but not land.
The County Assessor's values for free standing structures and
a facility in a strip shopping center differ. The major
• factor in a strip center is the square footage of the
building and land. The type of use is not included in calcu-
lations because it changes constantly. The assessor does
make adjustments based on vacancy rates in a center. Right
now the Cedar -Cliff occupancy rate is high and its
building/land value is higher than for the Flour Bin across
the street. The assessor said the City would have to break
out building/land costs for a particular center occupant
through whatever methods they choose; the County only asses-
ses as a whole.
At least ,some of the current holders of Eagan on -sale liquor
licenses do not meet valuation requirements but I believe
were grandfathered in when the Ordinance was adopted, or the
valuation was not considered when the license was issued.
The Valley Lounge, Richard's Food and Liquor and the
Mediterranean Cruise have payable 1985 valuations of
$105.,500, $98,600 and $147,400, respectively, including both
land and building. The Cedarvale Bowl and the Eagandale Club
probably do -not meet the valuation test either when it is
applied against the portion of the building relating to food
and liquor. 9�
2. Seating Capacity - Square Footage: Most communities set a
larger minimum seating capacity than Eagan. The higher
number tends to increase the valuation and decrease the
possibility of a "night club" facility. Although without a
food percentage requirement being enforced, size/seating
capacity may just produce larger facilities selling primarily
liquor.
3. Food -Liquor Ratio: This option also serves to promote
restaurant and decrease "night clubs" by requiring a greater
percentage of the business be with the food operation.
Brooklyn Center directly ties the license fee to the food
percentage and found this to be an effective means to
discourage "night clubs" and bars. An auditor's services
would be required to validate the food -liquor .ratio. Eagan
has not conducted any reviews of any establishment that I am
aware of, instead relying on good faith, voluntary compli-
ance.
4. Location: Whether to allow or disallow an liquor
establishment in a strip center has not been an issue in most
cities. If the applicant meets the Code requirements, he can
locate in any area zoned to allow such an establishment. In
Eagan, on -sale licenses can be a conditional use in the
following zones:
Limited Business - LB
Neighborhood. Business - NB
General Business - GB
Community Shopping Center - CSC
Regional Shopping Center - RSC
Roadside Business - RB (is &,.permitted use)
Limited Industrial and General Industrial allow
beer and wine only.
Given that information,- it may be appropriate to limit
licenses issued to smaller or lower valuation establishments
geographically so as to dispense a pre -determined number
throughout the community. This approach would be similar to
the current status of off -sale licenses. Without that
restriction, there is a staff concern about small strip
shopping centers having two or three licenses. For example,
both Slicers and Hong Wong in Cedar -Cliff.
5. Reserved Licenses: Most communities have many inactive
licenses and do not feel the need to reserve licenses. Eagan
may want to divide up the current maximum number available. to
different types or different valuation levels thereby
reserving a number of licenses for various types of
establishments.
The City Code currently incorporates four of these five possi-
bilities into issuance of on -sale licenses excluding only
geographic locations. The current combination of relatively low
seating capacity and license fee make liquor sales an economic
S71-5
possibility for a large number of businesses. The valuation
restrictions and food ratios while easy to define in a schedule
are very difficult to monitor and enforce. Any new schedule
based on valuation should incorporate existing licenses and not
just grandfather them which would generate a rather large number
in the lower valuation group and necessitate some review of
licenses such as Cedarvale Bowl.
C&
Adm' istrative Assistant
LW/E7V/kf
cc: E. J. VanOverbeke, Finance Director/City Clerk
•
ON -SALE LIQUOR INFORMATION
METRO AREA COMMUNITIES
�77
SEATING/
RESERVED
I FOOD
COMMUNITY
VALUATION
SQ. FOOT.
LICENSES
LOCATION %
FEE
Apple Valley
N/A
50(1200 )
none
none
none
$5000
Brooklyn Center
N/A
150
none
none
80%
$8000
50-79%
$11,000
_
40-49%
$14,000
Burnsville
$1,000,000
50
A-Restaurantnone
none
;;$5000
(includes
B -Restaurant
everything
in hotel/
but land)
motel
Coon Rapids
N/A
150
none
none
none
$5000
Maple Grove
N/A
none none none
I none
$4500
(Zoning ordinance might dictate
seating, square footage reqs.
On -sale liquor license does
not specify.)
Mendota Height
N/A
50min. none
none
none
$10,00
(open to public
75 max.
$3000
N/A
(limited service) --
100 none
none
50%
$7500
Minnetonka
Eagan
$200,000
30
PUD agreements $3500
may specify #
$500,000
1
of licenses per
Development
1 60%I
�77
CITY OF EAGAN
1. 'Al Baker's '83
3434 Washington Dr
2, Cedarvale Bowl 177
3883 Beau d'Rue Dr
3. Durnings '82
4625 'Nicola Rd
4. Eagandale Club �7q
3330 Pilot Knob Rd
5. LaFonda'a 76
3665 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
6: Mediterranean Cruise
3945 Sibley Mem. Hwy,.8.
7. Richard's Food 6 Liquo
4185 S. Robert Trai1,8.
8. Starks Saloon '73
3125 Dodd Rd
9. Valley Lounge '74
3385 Sibley Mem. Hwy.-
•
1986
ON -SALE LIQUOR LOCATIONS
Agenda Information
February 1Q, 19860
Page Twenty -Seven
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT STUART'S FIRST ADDITION
B. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 9.5 Acres and
Containing 144 Apartment Units Entitled Stuart's First Addition --
A public hearing was held before, the Advisory Planning Commission
at their January 2'8., 1986 meeting, to consider a preliminary plat
application submitted by Stuart Nolan for a 9.5 acre,, 144 apartment
unit project. This project is, to be located in Outlots A and
B, Tomark 2nd Addition. The Advisory Planning. Commission is recom-
mending approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions
in the staff report and with a modification to condition #11 that
allows for the prepayment of -special assessments. The prepayment
• of special assessments will not be—required as long as it was
a one -owner project vs. a condominium split between a number of
owners. Prior to being condominiums or selling this assessment
would be paid, is the language desired by the Commission. For
additional information on this item refer to the Planning and
Engineering Department report found on pages q0through
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending that
1) A cash dedication requirement be satisfied and 2) That a
bituminous trailway be allowed on Lexington Avenue. For a copy
of the APC minutes -refer to pages through �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat for Stuart's First Addition as presented.
1]
in
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT -
APPLICANT: STUART'S FIRST ADD (Stuart Nolan)
LOCATION: TOMARK 2ND ADD, NW'%, SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) =
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 15, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for preliminary
plat approval for the Stuart's First Addition. The plat consists
of 144 apartment units on 9.5 acres (2 outlots), east of Lexington
AV & west of Carriage Hills Golf Course,
ZONING & LAND USE: The site is zoned R-4 multiple and is surround-
ed by the same zoning on all sides except for an agricultural
lot along the SW property line. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
designated this area as R -III, density 6 - 12 units per acre.
Golfview Rd will be continued to the west and meet Lexington
AV directly across from Town Centre 100 Rd. The applicant has
an option on the- land north of this road extension. This area
contains a ponding area and is quite low in relation to the existing
Lexington AV, which is scheduled for improvements in 1988. The
subject area is rolling grassland and has little or no mature
,,:vegetation. ,
SITE PLANNING: There are two (2) buildings proposed, each contain -
in
_g
ontain-ing 72 units and underground parking. One additional 10' parking .
stal-l.has been provided outside thus meeting Code requirements _
in terms of size and numbers. These buildings will be connected `
by a covered walkway to a centrally located recreation building.''
This building will contain .a sauna,- whirlpool, spa, excercise
room and possibly an indoor pool. A tot lot will be provided
,.near the recreation building. O'Leary Park, acrossLexington
AV, will contain tennis courts when the parks development takes
place. .
-A secondary loop service drive will connect the parking 'areas
-and provide emergency access to the recreation building area.
This .drive will have knock -down bollards at the parking lot point..
The buildings and parking areas meet or exceed all City setback
and coverage requirements.
1
V
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 2
JANUARY 28, 1986
COMMENTS: The tentative project name will be%Carriage Crossings'.
These apartments will be made of 100% brick with redwood gables.
This style should be quite compatible to the surrounding area.
The apartments will be marketed as a higher income rental project.
Extra amenities include: fireplaces in some units, larger more
usable balconies and easy access laundry facilities in addition
to the enclosed recreation building features. The interior con-
struction will include staggard stud walls and gyperete to help
eliminate typical apartment noise as much as possible. Tentative
rent prices will be approx. $575, $675 and $775 for 1, 2 and
.3 bedroom units respectively.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading plan that the applicant submitted
is feasibleand within City Codes. Although the grading operations
will disturb almost the entire site, there is no substantial
vegetation or trees that the grading will affect. Staff recommends •
the applicant review his grading plan in the area between the
tot lot and rec building to provide better positive drainage
to the north. As it is now, water will stand in this area.
Also, the grading done on this development shall not adversly
impact the existing from the County's culvert under Lexington
Av and the private culvert under an existing dirt road at the
SW corner of this proposed development. The County will probably
replace the existing culvert with the upgrading of Lexington
Av in 1988. The grading plan, as proposed, shows filling of .
up to 8' over existing sanitary sewer line along the easterly
portion of .this proposed development. The existing cover is
about 10' presently, making the total proposed fill over the
pipe about 18'. While this depth approaches the maximum fill
height over the PVC sanitary sewer pipe, staff does not feel
this should pose any problems because the depth is still within
the allowable limits for backfilling over PVC pipe.
Prior to the gradingoperations and until the completion 'U f the •
restoration over this site, this development shall install adequate
'•erosion control measures to prevent the depositing of sediment
within existing City storm sewer lines in Golfview Dr or within
r,,the existing low area in the SE corner of this proposed development.'.
This development is located within drainage 'district "D -The
existing and future runoff will be toward the north and eventually
into pond DP -10. Project 443 (O'Neil pond) will provide the
gravity outlet from pond DP -10 downstream through DP -5 and DP -4. `
The downstream system from DP -4 is currently in place all the
way to the Minnesota River Valley. As a result, this development `
will not require any trunk storm sewer construction to accommodate.
its runoff. -
or' y
C �
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 3
JANUARY 28, 1986
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size,
capacity and depth are in place adjacent to this property to
provide service to it.
The sanitary sewer may be extended from the end of the existing
Golfview Dr westerly within Golfview Dr. The applicant can also
extend the existing 8" water main within Golfview Dr westerly
and connect into the existing 18" water main on the west side -
of Lexington AV to complete the watermain loop within this area.
At the writing of this report, it is the developer's intention
to proceed with the installation of public utilities and streets
under a private contract. The developer must submit plans and
specs prepared in accordance with City standards for review and
approval prior to final plat approval.
i STREETS: Lexington AV (Co. Rd. 43) abuts this development along
the west and Golf view Dr is stubbed to the NEcorner of this proposed
development. Dakota County Hwy Dept maintains jurisdiction over
Lexington AV, which is presently a two lane rural section roadway.
Dakota County proposes on improving Lexington AV to a 52' wide
minor arterial collector street in 1988. Golfview Dr is an existing
residential City street.
This development proposes to extend Golfview Dr westerly to Lexing-
ton Av. This intersection will be directly across from Town
Centre 100 Dr.
TRAILWAYS: Because of the designation of Lexington AV as a minor
arterial roadway, City policy will require a trailway along ,both
sides of Lexington Av. The trailway portion adjacent the westerly
border of this property will be the responsibility of this develop-
ment. . Because the actual installation of this trailway will
not be until 1988, staff recommends this development prepay for
the trailway installation as referenced under the assessment
paragraph.
PERMITS: This development will be -responsible for obtaining
the following permits prior to final plat approval:
1) MPC sewer extension permit
2) Mn Dept -of Health water main extension permit
3) Dakota County Hwy .access .and work within County right-of-way
permit
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends this development dedicate
the full 60' right-of-way for the Golfview Dr extension on the
final plat.
The previously platted Tomark Add provided for a 55' half right-of-
way for Lexington Av. This width should be sufficient for the .
-.upgrading of Lexington AV to 52' in the future. However, because .
v
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 4
JANUARY 28, 1986
of the potential grading required to rebuild Lexington AV, staff
recommends this development provide a 20' slope easement adjacent
the westerly boundary of this proposed development.
Staff will require increasing the easement over the existing
sanitary sewer to 30' centered over the sewer line because of
the additional fill proposed by this development. Because the
easterly parking lot for building #2 will be encroaching the
sanitary sewer easement, staff recommends that the applicant
enter into an agreeement with the City whereby the applicant
will agree to pay for any parking lot and trailway restoration
necessary if the City has to repair the sanitary sewer line in
the future.
ASSESSMENTS: The City assessment records indicate that for outlots
A & B of the Tomark 2nd Add, all trunk area related assessments
for water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer are either levied
or pending with the exception of lateral benefit from trunk water
main. This development will be responsible for the lateral benefit
from trunk water main as illustrated in figure #2 along its westerly
boundary at the rate in effect of final platting. In addition,
staff recommends this development prepay its multi -family rate
for Lexington AV future improvements along with the future trailway
improvements. The following table summarizes the assessment
responsibilities for this development.
Assessment Summary
Est'd 1986
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Lateral Benefit from 480 f.f. $11.88 : $5,702
Trunk Watermain
Lexington AV 480 f.f. $63.36 $30,413
Trailway 480 f.f. $11.81 $ 5,669
Total $41,784
All costs associated with the installation of the public improve-
ments will be the sole responsibility of this development.
.CONDITIONS:
1) The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if
only 2 stalls per unit are provided with this project.
2) Shall be subject to Park Commission's review and comment `:.
regarding park dedication. .
3):. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted and a bond
not to be released until 1 year after landscaping is completed.
4)_ Golfview Dr shall be extended out to Lexington Av.
I
STUART'S
FIRST ADD
PAGE
5
JANUARY
28, 1986
5)
This development shall not adversly impact any existing drainage
patterns with its site grading.
6)
This development shall loop the existing 8" watermain within
Golfview Dr to Lexington Av.
7)
This development shall be responsible for obtaining the -neces-
sary permits from MPCA, MN Dept of Health & Dakota County
Hwy Dept.
8)
This development 'shall grant the City a 20' slope easement
adjacent Lexington AV right-of-way.
9)
This development shall dedicate a 30' easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and enter into an agreement to pay for
restoration of parking lot or trailway where either encroaches
•
upon the City's easement.
10)
This development shall dedicate a full 60' right-of-way (outlot
C) for street purposes.
11)
This development shall be responsible for lateral benefit
from trunk water main and prepayment of its multi -family
equivalent for Lexington AV upgrading and also for the trailway
construction.
12)
All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
ae S'
LEGEND
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
6940
T 2
-4.4
Q'
M
DP -2.
I Q
";
740
'I
%P
.87
� .87
SCP -5
-8730
.875.9
8680
872.3
T-6 \�EP -
829
856
b
JP-;
832
854
Ek- —
U.
JF
9.
5 j
8740
9882F
0
0.1
................
................
................
................
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG.
City of eagan approved: standard
STORM SEWER plate #:
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
f. A 15 foot easemnt over o and 16, Block 2 and Lots 21 and
22, Block 1, fo orm sewer.
g. A 15 foot easeme t ocated ac s the common lot lines of Lots 1,
2, and 29 of Bloc 2 rm ewer.
9. This development shall be responsible for the installation of a 5 foot
concrete walk along Wescott Road.
All voted aye, except Mulrooney and Voracek who voted nay, stating that'PD
zoning should not be used s rictly to accoormo ate reduced lot sizes for single
family lots and that less a 11 a amily lots are not necessarily a
better use than other types of R-2 s s.
STUART'S S AD T - P LIMINARY PLAT
• Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for 144 apartment
units on approximately 9.5 acres, Outlots A and B, Tomark 2na Addition, in
part of the northwest quarter of Section 14, south of Yankee Doodle Road and
east of Lexington Avenue. Dale Runkle described the proposal as the
completion of two of the toutlots remaining in Tomark 2na Addition. Mr.
Stuart Nolan was present an subm' ea a written and oral request that he not
be required to prepay assessor for racing of Lexington Avenue and the
trail system, as the projec wo a mpass one owner, rather than the
multiple owners as in a conn mi ium a ion. He then described the
development as an up -scale apar m roje ith brick exterior, oak woodwork
comparable or better than t oocs Apartments on Shepard Road. Several -
condominium owners from Ca ri ills Condominiums appeared objecting on the -.
basis that they were having ifficulty with the developer of their complex in
gaining control of the Condominium Association. Apparently, the District
Court had recently ruled against them in regard to control of their
.:association based upon the developer's ability to bring the three additional
outlots into the aevelopmenar that Mr. Nolan was the owner
or owned the option to th three remainin lots and thus, the condominium
owners were advised to pursue ERU ma aM er with their own legal counsel.
-
Mulrooney moved, Bohne seconded th moIrntal
n to recommend approval of the
.preliminary plat, subject to the fo 10 ing aitions.
1. The garage shall be included in the unit price if only 2 stalls ....,
...per unit are provided with this project.
2,. Shall be subject to Park Commission's review and comment regarding
3. A detailed landscaping plan shall b submitted and a bond not to be
released not less than one ing is completed.
4. Golfview Drive shall be extended out o Lexington Avenue.
5. This development shall not adv rs ly impact any existing drainage
'patterns with its site grading.
d
0 .
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986 _
6. This development a o0p a isting 8 inch watermain within
Golfview Drive to Lexington
7. This development sal be res ns ble for obtaining the necessary
permits from MPCA, MN Depart m t o th d Dakota County Highway Dept.
8: This development shall grant the City a 20 foot slope easement
adjacent to Lexington Avenue right-of-way.
9. This development shall dedicate a 30 foot easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and Pnter into an ag eement to pay for restoration of
parking lot or trailway wher h s upon the City's easement.
10. This development shall eaica a full 60 foot right-of-way
(Outlot C) for street purposes._
11. This development sh re on le for lateral benefit from trunk •
water main and prepayment of its multi -family equivalent for Lexington Avenue
upgrading and also for the trailway construction.
12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
Ail voted in favor and std �asdirected to resolve any discrepancies
regarding condition No. 11 be tmeeting.
ADVENT UNITED METHODIS H - IMINARY PLAT 3 REZONING
Chairperson McCrea next co ea the public hearing for preliminary plat
for a church on approximately 5 acres and rezoning from R-2 and Agricultural
to PF (Public Facilities) located in part of the northeast quarter of Section
22, south of Westbury Drive and west of Lexington Ave. City Planner Runkle -..,
presented the application. Linda Mitchem from Be Architects, Inc. was present '
on behalf of the develo centered around the need for:!,,,.
landscaping buffer for ad3a nt residential a eas, the expansion of future
parking and the method for carrying away storm water run-off. Bohne moved,
-.".Wilkins seconded the motion to reco e a apr val of the rezoning from R-2 and
:-.Agricultural to PF (Public Faciliti s) Al oted in favor.-
Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded t e mo i n to recommend approval of the
,;preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The parking lot shall be completed to City standards as soon as the
overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
2. A detailed landscape plan and fin®n ial guarantee shall be submitted
and not released until wing season, whichever is later,
after the completion. The anascape plan sha L be submitted on an approved
grading plan at the time of Mai hall include plans for plantings
..___.on the north and south property lines. ._— a
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
?age Twenty -Eight.
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING/UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
C. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 5 Acres and
Containing One Lot and a Rezoning from PD to PF for Advent United
Methodist Church --A public hearing was held before the Advisory
Planning Commission at their January 28, 1986 meeting to consider
two (2) applications that were submitted by Advent Methodist Church
consisting of a rezoning from Planned Development to Public
Facilities and preliminary plat. The APC is recommending approval
of the preliminary plat and rezoning subject to the staff report
noting- that trees be planted on the north and south property lines
® and along Lexington Avenue. For additional information on this
item refer to the Planning and Enginee ing report, a copy is
enclosed on pages /D / through /OFor a copy of the
Parks and Recreation recommendation refer to page /O 9 For
a copy of the action that was taken by the APC refe to those
minutes found on page (s)//,Q4/// .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny
the rezoning from PD to PF. 2) To approve or deny the preliminary
plat for Advent United Methodist Church.
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
NE4, SECTION 22
R-2 & AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 17, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
• APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted by
Advent Methodist Church requesting a rezoning of R-2 and agricultur-
al districts to a single public facilities district south of
the Westbury Addition along Lexington Av.
ZONING & LAND USE: This site abuts the Westbury Addition to
the north and west, an agricultural parcel of approx. 5 acres
and Patrick Eagan Park, to the south. The Lexington Square develop-
ment is across Lexington Av. The Comprehensive Guide Plan design-
ates this area as R-1, single family, 0 - 3 units per acre.
The topography is quite flat with the highest areas being at
the 890 elevation and the lowest at 884. Off site to the south
and west the land drops off rather quickly towards the park.
The vegetation consists primarily of scrub grasses over a sandy
loam soil.
• CODE COMPLIANCE: , The proposed church building and parking area
will be constructed in a phased approach. The first phase will
consist of the main worship area (7,500 S.F.) and parking for
92 cars at 10' spacing. City Code requires 1 space for each
3.5 seats based on capacity design. 300 seats will be provided
thus requiring 85 spaces. The northern one-half of the parking
lot will be constructed with the initial development and the
remaining area will be graveled for overflow parking.
The building setback along Lexington AV is 70' and the parking
setback is 30', both within .the code requirements of 50' and
20' respectively. .-Ample' areas to the north and west have been
alloted for _future expansion. There will be no problem accomodating
setbacks and lot -coverage standards.
COMMENTS: Access to the church will be from a single 24' drive
from Lexington Av. The site distance appears good at this location.
A 12' wide -drop off area is provided on the northern most area
of this entry drive. A canopy will cover this area in a later
phase of development.
/O /
a
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
The building will be a single story and consist of either cedar
or redwood. A wood frame struction will most likely be the con-
struction style, however, the architect wishes to use some brick
if the funds become available. Asphalt shingles will also be
used. At this point, no steeple is foreseen and the height will
not appear out of scale with the surrounding areas. Staff has
not seen building elevations as of yet.
A preliminary landscape plan has been provided and it illustrates
screening of the parking area from Lexington AV through the use
of plant material and an earth berm.
TOPOGRAPHY/DRAINAGE: This development is located west of Lexington
AV and south and east of—the Westbury Additions. The existing
topography is relatively flat farmland draining in a westerly •
direction. This proposed development is located within drainage
district "J", as depicted in Figure ;1. Drainage from this proposed
development is to be directed into trunk storm sewer which eventual-
ly outlets into pond JP -9 (McCarthy Lake).
There are two alternatives available for the parking lot drainage.
First, the parking lot could drain to the east towards Lexington
AV where storm water would be collected in catch basins constructed
by this development and outlets into the ditch along Lexington
Av. This would require County approval. The second alternative
would be to drain the parking lot to the west in its natural
drainage pattern through Patrick Eagan Park to pond JP -9. This
would require the approval of the Eagan Park Commission.
UTILITIES: An 18" trunk watermain was installed under project
395-I and is located 20' west of the centerline of Lexington
AV, which will sufficiently service this project.
As part of the Westbury Addition, an 8" sanitary sewer lateral
was constructed and a manhole placed at the north property line
of this proposed development to adequately service this site.
It would be the responsibility of this development to extend
the saidsanitarylateral from its north property line to its
south property line for future service to parcel 010-02, located
directly south.
STREETS/TRAILWAYS: Lexington AV borders this proposed development
on the east. This road is a County road and is presently planned
to be upgraded from a two lane rural section to a four lane urban
section in 1988. County approval will be required for the entrance
location onto Lexington AV.
It will be the responsibility of this developmentto construct
an 8' bituminous trailway adjacent to Lexington Av.
/D y
0
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: A 55' half right-of-way will be required
to be dedicated for Lexington Av. In addition to all regular
10' utility easements adjacent to public right-of-way and 5'
drainage and utility easements adjacent to all lot lines, a utility
easement will be required for the sanitary lateral to be extended
from the north to south property lines of this proposed development.
In addition, a ponding and utility easement will be required
if the parking area is to be drained to pond JP -9. A 10' trailway
easement shall be provided adjacent to Lexington Av.
ASSESSMENTS: Research into the assessments regarding this site
indicate the site is still responsible for the upgrading of trunk
area storm sewer and trunk area watermain from agricultural to
commercial rates. These are summarized on the following table:
Estimated 1986 Amount
Description Quantity Date
Trunk Area Water Upgrading 3.73 (ac)(1) $1,830(2) $6,825
Trunk Area Storm Sewer
Upgrading
Total
162,564 S.F.(1)
$0.025(3) $4,065
$10,890
(1) Net Area
(2) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($3,020 - 1,190)
(3) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($0.075 - 0.050)
CONDITIONS:
1) The canopy area will require a Conditional Use Permit.
2) ' The parking lot shall be completed to City ' standards as
soon as the overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
3) A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submit-
ted and not released until 1 year after completion. The
landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading
plan -at the time of final plat.
3). A detailed grading and erosion control plan be' submitted
for approval by staff.
4) This development shall be responsible for an 8' bituminous
"trailway along Lexington Av.
5) Right-of-way shall be dedicated as referenced in the engineering
report.
6) All utility &drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenc-
ed in the engineering report.
Al 3
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 4
CONDITIONS (continued)
7) The costs of all sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer shall
be the sole responsibility of this development.
8) County approval must be obtained for the entrance to Lexington
Av prior to final plat approval.
9) County approval or Park Commission approval must be obtained
for the parking lot drainage prior to final plat approval.
10) Minimum setbacks & parking requirements shall be met prior to
building permit issuance.-
11)
ssuance-11) This development shall assume the additional assessments
as defined in the staff report based on rates in effect at
the time of final plat approval.
12) This development shall be responsible to extend the sanitary
sewer to the south boundary for future development.
13) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
0
LOCATION PIAN
approximate scale t° - 400'
/--f/
�-- R-2
zoNiNC��
Aej. ZONING /
PARK , p
PA-[F,IcK EAGArt �-
PAP-K
no,
PSK
EXISTING ZONING CP SITE IS R-2 AG
PROPOSED REZONING TO PF - PUBLIC FACILITY
ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
be architects, Inc.
lake elmo, minnesota
5
pt
ri
rzcL arxs cAxa:y � I I .
X637.0eaa aao eoz r/I
PRELI".,�NARY GRADING, DRAINAGE, oo'
AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN id SCALE so' I I2
ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH be architects, Inc.
EAGAN, MINNESOTA lake elmo, minnesota
CITY
MALL
�! JP -41 L5. -
t4 665.3.._ �ry�•
687.0
JP -31 -+
676.3 +
890.4
I- Z
41==J4 -
J P -20C
852.0
8356
JP
81
64
r�
r_•
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. *1
city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate #d
0PUBLIC
WORKS
- MASTER PLAN -
DEPARTMEN
I
0
L
SUBJECT PARCEL
/6 gr FIG. #2
city of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved: standard
EDPUBLIC plate #:
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
y
MEMO TO �AONORABLE.MAYOR'&;CITY COUNCILM_EMBERS
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR.
L1 FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1986
RE: ADVISORY PARKS & REC COMM ACTION - ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
At the February 6th meeting of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission, the
Commission reviewed the preliminary plat for Advent United Methodist Church.
In reviewing the plat, the Advisory Commission expressed some concern over the
proposed drainage flow from the parking lot through Patrick Eagan Park.
Concern is for overland drainage which would cause erosion within steep sloped
areas further to the west. It was noted that staff was to meet with the
representatives of the church to"review possible alternatives.
• The Advisory Commission recommended the following:
1) That this development be responsible for costs associated with a
bituminous trailway on Lexington Avenue through the length of its plat.
2) That the cash dedication requirement be waived until such time that this
property is converted into any other use.
KV/js
CC: Julie Dykstra, Planning -Aide
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
6. This developmenta oop isting 8 inch watermain within
Golfview Drive to Lexington
7. This development s;
al be res ns ble for obtaining the necessary
permits from MPGA, MN Departm t o th d Dakota County Highway Dept.
8. This development shall grant the City a 20 foot slope easement -'
adjacent to Lexington Avenue right-of-way.
9. This development shall dedicate a 30 foot easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and pnter into an ag eement to pay for restoration of
parking lot or trailway wher h s upon the City's easement.
10. This development shall�re
edica a full 60 foot right-of-way
(Outlot C) for street purposes.
11. This development sh on ' le for lateral benefit from trunk •
water main and prepayment of its multi -family equivalent for Lexington Avenue
upgrading ana also for the trailway construction.
12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
All voted in favor and sta as directed to resolve any discrepancies
regarding condition No. 11 be the cit meeting.
ADVENT UNITED METHODIS H - IMINARY PLAT 6 REZONING
Chairperson McCrea next co ea the public hearing for preliminary plat
for a church on approximately 5 acres and rezoning from R-2 and Agricultural
to PF (Public Facilities) located in part of the northeast quarter of Section
22, south of Westbury Drive and west of Lexington Ave. City Planner Runkle
presented the application. Linda Mitchem from Be Architects, Inc. was present -
on behalf of the aevelo centered around the need for
landscaping buffer for adJa nt residential a eas, the expansion of future -
parking and the method for carrying away s orm water run-off. Bohne moved,
Wilkins seconded the motion toe d ap r val of the rezoning from R-2 and
..-.-Agricultural .to PF (Public Faciliti s) Al oted in favor. ...
- Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded t e mo i n to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The parking lot shall be completed to City standards as soon as the
overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
.2. A detailed landscape plan and fin®n ial guarantee shall be submitted
and not released until-orwing season, whichever is later,
after the completion. The ands cape plan sha 1 be submitted on an approved
grading plan at the time of Fina p a an hall include plans for plantings
,_._.on the north and south property lines. ❑ _ -
•
E
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
3. A detailed grading Lan erosion n rol
approval by staff.
4. This development ha be re po ible
trailway along Lexington Ave.
plan shall be submitted for
for an 8 foot bituminous
5. Right-of-way shall be dedicated as referenced in the engineering
report.
6. All utility and drainage easements shall
the engineering report.
7. The costs of all sanitary s wer, w ter
sole responsibility of this develop t.
8. County approval must be ob in fo the
prior to final plat approva
be dedicated as referenced in
and storm sewer shall be the
entrance to Lexington Avenue
9. County approval or Park Commission approval must be obtained for the
parking lot drainage prior to final plat approval.
10. Minimum setbacks parking requirements shall be met prior to
building permit issuance.
11. This development shall sim¢�51ie additional assessments as defined
in the staff report based rates effect at the time of final plat
approval.
12. This development s al responsible to extend the sanitary sewer to
the south boundary for Tutu a development.
13. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
All voted in favor.
BUR OAR HILL PREDNARY PLAT
The public hearing for Bur Oak
sprminary plat was next convened by
Chairperson McCrea, consisting of a requ for preliminary plat for 216
single family lots on approximately ill acres located in part of the southeast
quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway
455. City Planner Runkle presented the proposal with its history under an
existing planned development agreement, which included a preliminary plat with
duplex units and some commercial area. Rere entatives from Harstad Companies
and First National Bank of St. Paul er present to answer questions.
Discussion centered around t a amount of park land and change
.in access thereto, as compa ed to the origina plat proposed under the planned
development agreement. It was recommende that the developer work with the
Park Department for access to the park and th t the Cul-de-sacs be adjusted
slightly to prevent unnecessary steep cuql_j to the rolling topography. Mr.
Mike McAllistrum representing First National Bank, pointed out to the Planning
Commission that as owner of the property, First National Bank would not down-
L
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Pace Twenty -Nine
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT,.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PYLON SIGN
K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
D. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 2..1 Acres and
Containing 1 Strip Commercial Facility With 18,620 Square Foot
Strip Retail Center, Conditional Use Permit and a Pylon Sign --
A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission
at their January 28, 1986 meeting to consider applications submitted
by K Charles Corporation for a retail strip center, conditional
use permit for a drive-through restaurant facility and a pylon
sign. The Advisory Planning—Commission is recommending approval
of the preliminary plat and conditional use permits. For additional
information on this item refer to the ,Planning and Engineering
Department report, copies enclosed on pages //3 through &0
for your review. The APC is recommending that a cash dedication
requirement be allowed consistant with the City's commercial/
industrial policy. For action that was taken by the APC refer
to a copy of those minutes found on pages AV through /aa .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat, conditional use permit and pylon sign for the
K Charles Addition as presented.
112-
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: K. CHARLES DEVELOPMENT CORP
LOCATION: NWi, SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 16, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: Two separate applications ?.ave been submit-
ted by the K. Charles Development Corporat'.on. The first being
a preliminary plat for a 17,620 so,, ft. retail strip center along
the southern side of Duckwood Dr and east of Krestwood La. The
other is a conditional use for a pylon sign and drive-thru for
a restaurant on the eastern portion of the building.
ZONING & LAND USE: This site is surrounded
shopping center) zoning on the north and east,
the proposed Hardee's Restaurant. It will be
the access points to Hardees and the subject
.from each other. The area to the south is
• business, just east of the First B-ank Eagan.
with little or no vegetation at this time.
by CSC (community
To the west is
important that
site meet across
designated limited
The land is flat
SITEPLANNING & CODE COMPLIANCE: This plat will consist of the .
retail area ± 2.1 acres and an outlot of nearly 1 acre to the
south. Two entry/exit points are provided, .one along Krestwood
La and the other on Duckwood Dr. Both are large enough for east
vehicular movement and -have good site lines. Most of the parking
will be on the northern one-half of the site. A one way loop
road along the southern portion of the site will provide parking
for 29 cars and stacking for the fast food menu board and pick
up area. City Code requires one parking stall per 150 sq. ft.
.in retail areas. This 12,620 sq, ft, center will require 84
stalls. The fast. food restaurant, a food fair type that will
include the Golden Skillet and a Dairy Queen, will not have a
separate parking area but use available stalls from the 109 that
are provided. The parking stalls are shown_ to be 10' wide and
both building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements.
.Staff has recommended that an easement between the retail area
and the out -lot be created. to allow movement between the parcels '
;,,.without going on Krestwood first. Also, that only one -access
be allowed onto Krestwood from the outlot,
iii
K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT & COND USE PERMIT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
The interior lighted pylon sign will be located west of the Duckwood
Dr entrance and must be placed 10' within the property line from
the widest portion of the signage area. This sign area --will ,
be approx. 90 sq, ft per.side and the height will be 20'.
COMMENTS: The building's exterior will be brown iron spotted
brick over concrete block with a concrete walkway in front.
Store front accents will be achieved through the use of anodized
aluminum - the color has yet to be determined. A rock faced
coping will continue around the entire building above the sign
band area. The signage will typically be ± 24". The back side
of the building will be 8" single score painted concrete block..,
The gabled entry to the Food Fare area will be sky lighted...
and serve as a major focal point. A tot lot will be provided
adjacent to the northern portion of -the restaurant and will require •
some form of safety barrier from the parking/road areas. A separate
trash area has not been shown, therefore, it is assumed that
all debris will be contained within the building.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: Because this site is rather flat, the grading
the applicant is proposing is certainly feasible. The final
grading plan the applicant submits for final plat approval shall
contain adequate erosion control methods in accordance with the
City's Erosion Control Manual.
This site lies within major drainage district D as shown in Figure
1. All downstream trunk storm sewer facilities within this district
are in place. No trunk storm sewer facilities are necessary
as a result of this development.
However, this development will- be responsible for extending
the existing ,storm ,sewer outlet from Krestwood La to their ea
s
property line.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain of .sufficient size,
capacity and depth exist within Krestwood La and Duckwood Dr.
;This development will not require any.utilities extensions..
STREETS: buckwood Dr borders this --proposed development on .the
north and Krestwood La borders on the west. Both streets are
City streets. Duckwood Dr is classified as -a community collector -
street and was constructed to City standards in 1985 under project
429. Krestwood La is classified as a local street also .Built
to City standards..
The northerly access to this development from Duckwood Dr lines
up with Town Centre Dr 70 to form a four-way intersection. _. The
westerly access from Krestwood La is far ,enough away from the
Duckwood Dr. intersection to provide safe ingress and egress.'
However, staff recommends the Commission stay flexible and require .,.,.;
-this development to work with the proposed Hardee's, across the
:,•street, to. line up their respective entrances onto Krestwood
La Finally,. staff recommends that the Commission allow only
S K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT a COND USE PERMIT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
•,
one access to the proposed outlot because it wil not be wide
enough to support two accesses. Staff recommends this development
provide for a cross easement so that both the proposed outlot
and this development can share the westerly access.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate a 40
foot half right-of-way for Duckwood Dr and a 30 foot half right-of-
way for Krestwood La.
This development shall also dedicate a 30 foot utility easement
for the storm sewer extension.
ASSESSMENTS: This development will be responsible for trunk
area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time
of final platting.
CONDITIONS:
1) This development shall be responsible for extending the existing
storm sewer from Krestwood La to its east line.
2) This development shall be responsible for working with the
development across the street to line up their respective
accesses onto Krstwood La.
3) Only one access shall be allowed onto Krestwood La for the
outlot.
4) Cross easements shall be provided by the applicant so that
both the developed lot and future outlot can share one access
onto Krestwood La.
5) This development shall dedicate 40' & 30" half right-of-ways
- for Duckwood Dr & Krestwood Ln respectively.
6) This development shall be responsible for trunk storm sewer .
area assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final
platting. .
7) The- pylon sign be located 10' within the property line .and
subject to the one time sign ordinance fee of $2.50/sq. ft.
8) A detailed landscape plan on the proposed grading plan be
submitted demonstrating suitable screening and berming of
the parking areas. -
9) An easement be created between lot 1 and the outlot to provide
road access between the two parcels at. the time the outlot
is developed.
elseE�AN CONVENIENCE CENTER
w iu =
FY A�e"Y tes EAGAN MINNESOTA
EW14 CONVENIENCE CENTER
EAGAN IUINNFSl1TA
0� M/
.
FvodFare
t
y..
r
bt
L�7�uYur lW
.
I
..
-
0
-
-
rro.io mv..o
.v
PAM IM
'
r
.+i�L.!-La��.'.:L��1p<.1.►i.•µ,�6�f��il�1LY�M:
Vi4i��-PZ%�.\-�L�. �.•µ'-W�Ia .W./1��f
NPYLON SIGN ELEVATION
NO SCALE
EW14 CONVENIENCE CENTER
EAGAN IUINNFSl1TA
0
•
�P..L. ?
; HNSvW
69c,
CP -6
715.0
7/9.7 -
[r. rE.;Ni
i�
r
................
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. *1 1
city Of eagan 1J approved: standard
PUBLICSTORM SEWER. plate #.:
WORKS 0
DEPARTMEry MASTER PLAN
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
1
11. If public improvements r o e ins alley unser City contract, the
appropriate improvements shall ordered for tallation by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
12. The developer shall comp wt st et revisions presented by the
Commission on January 28, 1986, inc n shortening of the cul-de-sac on
the east side of the park property, (b) deleting the eyebrow on the originally
proposed street conception, (c) deleting the small cul-de-sac in the
southeasterly portion of the plat, (d) extending the street in the
northeasterly corner of the plat, and (e) providing a through -street in the
northwest corner of the plat.
13. The developer shall comply w t the ocess found necessary by the
City of Eagan to properly rezone the pr rty t -1.
All voted in favor.
K. CHARLES DEVELOPMENT CORP. - PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing regarding the
preliminary plat request and citional use permit for a 17,620 square foot
retail strip center with and in luai a 6,000 square foot drive-through
restaurant and pylon sign located " art he northwest quarter of Section
15, south of Duckwood Drive and east tw Lane. Dale Runkle explained
that the proposal met the City requi a ents. ob Venny, architect for the
project, was present to answer q e ns. equest for nine foot parking
spaces for employees at the r o e building was requested. A
representative of Krestwood nd niums exp ressea concern about hours,
lighting and traffic. It was po nted out that the pylon sign must comply with
code in relation to the previously permitted Hardees pylon sign. Trygg moved,
.-Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and
conditional use permit for a pylon sign,and drive-through facility, subject to..
,-,,,,the following conditions
1. This development shall be responsiDle extending the existing storm
sewer from Krestwood Lane to its east lin
.2. This development shall be respon i le f r orking with the development
across the street to line up their respective a ce sea onto Krestwood Lane.
3. Only one access shall be allowed onto Krestwood Lane for the outlot.
4. Cross easements shall be provided by the applicant so that both the
- developed lot and future outlot can share one a ce s onto Krestwooa Lane.
5. This development shall d 30 foot half right-of-ways
.for Duckwood Drive and Krestwood Lane respectively.
...._. 6. This development shall be
assessments at the rates in effect at
responsib a for trunk storm
the time tLyinal platting.
sewer area -._
•
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
7. The pylon sign shalb oca a eet within the property line and
subject to the one time sig ainance fee 2.50 per square foot.
8. A detailed lanasca a Ian on h proposed grading plan shall be
submitted demonstrating suita e s ng d berming of the parking areas.
9. An easement shall be created between Lot 1 and the Outlot to provide
road access between the two parcels at the time the outlot is developed.
10. Only one access shall be allowed from Krestwood Lane into the outlot.
All voted in favor.
ECONOMICS LABO OUIN WAIVER OF PLAT
City Planner Runkle aavi tcant had requested a continuance
of this matter. All members voted in favor of a continuance.
AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then comme the public hearing for conditional use
'permit for two above -ground !!'7n�dstom tanks on 2.3 acres on Lot 5 of the
Robert O'Neil homestead, locate p he southeast quarter of Section
2, north of Trunk Highway _ #55 no D oad. A representative of the
applicant was present and wit d the uest for a conditional use permit
for a 14 ft. by 14 ft. by 2 hi iesel tank, and is requesting only -
consideration for a 14 ft. 7 t. CO2 tank. Mr. Mark Parranto was present
on behalf of RES Partne ship to object as being located too close to the
proposed office building sites. It was suggested that the tank might be
considered a heavy industrial use. Mulrooney moved, Trygg seconded the motion
• to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for CO2 tank. Four voted :.
,;.against and three voted in
EAGAN CENTUITE L REVIEW
Mr. Jim Curry was present to v ew h Eagan Center Site Plan review,
which now included a self-service gas stat with grocery store and separate
service bays on the west end of. the proposed commercial site. Bohne
recommended approval of the site plan and subject to (1) City Ordinance, (2)
staff conditions, and (3) compliance with Uniform Building Code and any other
state building or fire codes. Trygg secondeed the motion and all voted in
favor.
ZONING AMENDMEN- PUD RENEWAL, E TENSION a TERMINATION,
Because of the late hour, this item wantinued.
L
Agenda Information
February 18: 1986,
Page Thirty
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ATRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES
E. Conditional Use Permit for Above Ground Liquid Storage Tanks --
A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission
at their last regular meeting held on January 28, 1986, to consider
an application for a conditional use permit to allow two (2) above
ground liquid storage tanks on Lot 5 of the Imre Addition, west
of T.H. 149 and north of T.H. 55. The APC is recommending denial
of the conditional use permit for outside storage. For additional
consideration on this matter refer to the City staff report, a
copy is enclosed on pages_ through /2� For a copy
of the APC minutes refer to page_
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To app—rove or deny the
conditional use permit for the above -ground liquid storage tanks
as requested by Airco Industrial Gases.
/23
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINSTRATOR HEDGES
CITY PLANNER RUNKLE
FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER I
FEBRUARY 13, 1986
SUBJECT: AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASSES - CONDITIONAL USE
On the Janury 28, 1986, APC meeting, Airco Industrial Gasses
withdrew its application for diesel tank storage. The request for
storage of CO (carbon dioxide) in 14' x 14' x 17' tanks was
denied in a 4-1 vote.
Since then the applicant has submitted an alternative to City
staff. The proposed COtanks will now measure approximately 8'
• (width) x 56' (length) x29' (height)._ As a reference, these tanks
will be smaller than those of a semi -truck trailer and will be
painted white.
Airco has provided staff with brochures detailing their business
operation, and these are available for your review upon request.
Representatives from Airco will be present to provide pictures of
the site and to answer additional questions.
Planner I
JS/jj
•
/a /
Section Slu-S
iRGO industrial Gases 50 Ton Receiver
TOMCO Design
�64=y
e s
O O
r i
c
56'-6° 90"
CAPACITY 100,000 lbs. of carbon dioxide
MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE
OPERATING PRESSURE RANGE
WEIGHT OF EMPTY RECEIVER
INSULATION
SAFETY DEVICES
350 Psig
200 Psig to 300 Psig
55,000 lbs.
3" Polyurethane
0
Goss L j
I I •
ITEM
QUANTITY PURPOSE
SIZE SETTING
MANUFACTURER
Safety
I Main Safety
1 W, x 2" 350 Psig
ANDERSON.
Valve
Valve
GREENWOOD
Regulator
2 Vapor Pressure
3181' 330 Psig
CASH -ACME
Relief Valve
CONNECTIONS
Liquid Process Line I" with 1" Ball Valve
Liquid Fill Line 1 %- with I W' Ball Valve
Vapor Equalizing Line 1" with 1" Bill Valve
IQ -
Page 19 of 20
F3
n
LJ
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES
LOCATION: LOT, 5, IMRE ADDITION, SEh, SECTION 2
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P.D.)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 8, 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: •An application has been submitted requesting
a Conditional Use Permit to allow two (2) above -ground liquid
storage tanks on lot 5 of the Imre Addition, west of T.H. 149
& north of T.H. 55.
BACKGROUND: The proposed storage tanks will be used to hold
liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) and diesel motor fuel for Airco Industrial
Gases. Currently the zoning is PD; surrounding land uses are
of the light industrial or general business nature. General
Coatings is to the immediate north as is Artistic Wood. An excavat-
ing company's building, to the east, i9 at least 250 feet from
Airco's eastern property line. Access to the site is provided
from a service drive that connects to a frontage road north of
T.H. 55.
TANK 1 (LIQUID CO2)
This CO2 tank, approved by the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME), will measure '14' x 75' and be 16' high (see
exhibits). The volume is 250 tons, however, the tanks only hold
75% liquid and are regulated by two separate_ sets of safety controls. .
The tank will be located 5' from the -7'_ chain link fence on the
north and west.
Carbon dixoide has a variety of uses including; carbonation
of beverages, fire extinguishing, freezing of meat and chilling
everything from medicines to semi -conductor components. C62
does not promote- combustion and as a result, this type of .tank
can often be stored within a building. The applicant intends
to- store this liquid only and wil not use it -on the site. Koch
Refinery of Rosemount is the supplier. The Building Inspection .
Department has approved this tank and plan at the January 6,
1986 staff review meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - AIRCO
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
TANK 2 (DIESEL MOTOR FUEL)
This proposed diesel fuel storage will measure 14' x 14' and
be 20' tall. The applicant wishes to place the tank in one of
two possible locations; 1) between warehouses 1 & 2 along the
eastern property line of the site or 2) just south of the proposed
CO2 tank. Due to the size and height of this tank, there will
be special safety precautions required by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) and a separate approval by the State Fire
Marshall's office.
The City Inspection's Dept has no other requirements other than
the written approval by the MPCA & State Fire Marshall's office.
CONDITIONS:
1) Detailed Landscape plan be submitted to bring the area into
compliance with City Code. Screeningshould be encouraged to
lessen the impact of these two tanks.
•
/aZ�Q
•
HTS
'
��
:'
-- - �- r -- - ----------
v..
IE
\
� LL+ )•
I
LLS\I
l�
O
S
crR•
C l'se.P C�
YC I•
`L*E�
'yi
6I
YIN
GC
R
3
Y/i
1
Rnl
.����
Iz+
• p� LML
zU
R0 �• 1RW
�
C Ym
O
llfai`x-6v ' u
I�
LIGNT IYPYSIR UL �YNDER DEYCLOpMENT�
.LOT I
I la.u..n. Y.FF WI.4L i /
LR.xnwus7eliF. � , _ _ e — it Lor z .
- Fw i euna.ucw . � I
T u ,
PART . LOT 5
I
gg I
yN d I---
\, . I L07 6
u LIyNT INDYSTLILL (YNPEE PEYMPMEMb
I
l 4y I
SS
LO !,"
-MRE-ADUTIC
MINNESOTA. '�-
1•R CD
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
7. The pylon sign shal b oca a eet within the property line and
subject to the one time sig ainance fee 2.50 per square foot.
8. A detailed Lanasca aLan on h proposes gracing plan shall be
submitted demonstrating suita e s ng a berming of the parking areas.
9. An easement shall be created between Lot 1 and the Outlot to provide
road access between the two parcels at the time the outlot is developed.
10. Only one access shall be allowed from Krestwooa Lane into the outlot.
All voted in favor.
ECONOMICS LABO OR IN WAIVER OF PLAT
• City Planner Runkle advi t t licant had requested a continuance
of this matter. All members voted in favor of a continuance.
AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then comme the public hearing for conditional use
permit for two above—ground d sto tanks on 2.3 acres on Lot 5 of the
Robert O'Neil homestead, locate p he southeast quarter of Section
2, north of Trunk Highway 455 na D oad.. A representative of the
applicant was present and wi a the uest for a conditional use permit
for a 14 ft. by 14 ft. by 2 hi esel tank, and is requesting only
consideration for a 14 ft. 7 t. CO2 tank. Mr. Mark Parranto was present
on behalf of RES Partne ship to object as being located too close to the
proposed office building sites. It was suggested that the tank might be
considered a heavy industrial use. Mulrooney moved, Trygg seconded the motion
. to recommend approval of the.conaitional use permit for CO2 tank. Four voted.:•
against and three voted in
EAGAN CENTVITE L REVIEW
Mr. Jim Curry was present• to v ew h Eagan Center Site Plan review,
which now included a self—service gas stat with grocery store and separate
service bays on the west end of. the proposed commercial site. Bohne
recommended approval of the site plan and subject to (1) City Ordinance, (2)
staff conditions, and (3) compliance with Uniform Building Code and any other
state building or fire codes. Trygg seconded the motion and all voted in
favor.
ZONING AMENDMEN—PUD RENEWAL,— PUD RENEWAL, EE TENSION 6 TERMINATION,
Because of the late hour, this item wantinued.
Agenda information t:emo
February i, 1586, City Council eeting
Page Thio'=y-Cne
SITE PLAN REVIEW/EAGAN CENTER
F. Site Plan Review for Eagan Center/Mark Ravich---A. site ,plan
review was considered at the last regular 'meeting of the Advisory
Planning Commission. The site plan review was presented by
Mar'., Ravich for: the Eagan Center located on a portion of the
commercial property identified as Lexington South Planned Develop-
ment and owned by Jim Curry. For additional information on
this item, refer to the City Planner's report found on pages
1,3/ through I33 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON—THIS ITEM: To provide Mr. Ravich
• with some direction regarding the concep_ plan as presented.
)30
MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSON
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 23, 1986
SUBJECT: EAGAN CENTER SITE PLAN REVIEW - LOCATED IN PART
SECTION 23, LEXINGTON AV & COUNTY RD 30
In 1984, Mr Jim Curry submitted a plan which revised the commercial
portion of the Lexington South Planned Development. This plan
reduced the amount of community shopping center district and
provided some neighborhood and limited business areas. The first
application was a preliminary plat in the neighborhood business
portion abutting Lexington Av, south of Co Rd 30. The one comment
made with this preliminary plat was that the square footage require-
ment of 20,000 sq. ft. still.be-upheld for the neighborhood business
portion. Mr Mark Ravich has been working with the first development
plan and is trying to obtain leases in order to construct a 20,000
sq. ft. strip center. Since the last approval in 1985, Mr Ravich
has changed the site plan slightly and would like to review this
with the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. The
preliminary plat and final plat will not change, therefore, no
repeat public hearing is needed for this review.
The change that Mr Ravich would like to discuss is on the north
end of the building. Instead of 'a'typical strip center, Mr Ravich
has been working with a service station that would provide gas
pumps on the north._ end of the building and also have 4 service
bays that would have access from the east side of the building.
Additional landscaping and berming has been done on the east
side by Center Drive in order to screen the access to the service
bays as much as possible. This facility would. contain two 20'
drive aisles so that cars may circulate around the pump island.
In reviewing the zoning ordinance, it appears that a service
station with service bays is a permitted use within the neighborhood
business district. This appears to be a unique concept with
tying it to the strip center. Mr Ravich would like to review
this concept with the Planning Commission and City Council. If
the Commission does approve this concept -`it should be subject
to a detailed landscape plan and revised grading plan so that
adequate berming can be provided around the east end of the building.
All other conditions placed on the Eagan Center lst Addition
shall be adhered to for this development plan.
131
I
r- �� °''15`ti� �• �� 5 �'.Ia; �}�},t�•1 1 - .411L��,- ',�4pt1 ��
f ( Y: r ) • w� • i
FUTURE -$TREAT-
i j i .. "•l:. '�' /''. 1 vv , - •Ms11L IIY rBYIIIIL?Ipl 'r �/
r, :..i • Y. '.� f.. •rte ��.. W:11: •r I •• .WI 11111- .\IW `
^s I �' � i,�% ./ � lid' •,�' � I I "I ' I
MIND
lip
l F .�,I, _ ♦ S S , S a:'• _ ,f 'y ''+AWki ...iu 'm11 --w-`^ ••
F Ilnw •—+ Y r
\>K" ia�I. 1 • i.-,� i r�%1 �� t� �� �� r.l a ar
.y � �.�J,�1`
' VV .\ LI 1 (•'ll .I .f 1 d I M L
t
lip
..i li W.t o<
07
LE%INOTOH AVE;
9
r
•• r\nMRi dIN.6UflflM I �1TdRl� CENTER FE�a ' '- ❑.
—•-�'� 5r wn 5i '� : _,'111E dPP€fl TFRflIF6
Amw MI11A€A91A 11{il
..
Agenda Informat_on
Fe,b%nary 18, 1986,
Page Thirty-. ;o
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 86-5/WINDTREE 5TH AND 6TH ADDITIONS
A. Review of League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies --On
January 21, 1986, the Council held a public hearing to discuss the
installations of streets and utilities that service the Windtree 5th
and 6th Additions. As a result of that public hearing, the Council
approved a project and authorized the preparation of detailed plans
and specifications which have now been completed and are being
presented to the Council for their review in consideration of
authorizing an advertisement for bid solicitation. The Public Works
Director and consulting engineer will be available to discuss the
details of these plans and a.9sw er any questions that may arise.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and
specifications for Contract 86-5 (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions)
and to authorize an advertisement for a bid opening to be held at
10:30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, 1986.
CONTRACT 86 -7/0 -NEIL POND.
B. Contract 86-7, Approve Plans And Specifications (O'Neil Pond)
Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --On December 3, 1985, a public hearing was
held to discuss the pond's trunk storm ,sewer outlet for ;the ponds
being created on the O''Neil property under project 443. As a result
of that public hearing, the Council ordered the project to be
installed and authorized the preparation of detailed plans and
specifications which have now been completed and are being presented
to the Council for their review and consideration of authorizing
the advertisement for bid solicitation. The Public Works Director
and consulting engineer will be available to discuss the details
of these plans and answer any questions that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: -To -approve the plans and
specifications for Contract 86-5 .(:Windtree 5th and 6th Additions)
and to authorize an advertisement for a bid opening to be held
at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, 1986.
/3V
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
It is suggested that a Special City Council meeting be set for
Tuesday, March 11, 1986, for the purpose of reviewing our Management
By Objectives which essentially outlines specific goals and
objectives in a work program for 1986. At that meeting the City
Administrator would like to update the City Council on the status
of the radio communications system which has received additional
evaluation since budget discussions --last fall. There are some
various City Council and administrative policies that need to
be reviewed which could be considered at that meeting. The City
Administrator will provide a detailed agenda of information to
be discussed well in advance of the meeting. If this date is
agreeable to members of the City Council a motion will be suggested
at the meeting on Tuesday to set March 11 as a Special City
Council/Workshop session to review a number of items.
DETACHED HOUSING STUDY
Attached on page /39, is a copy of a memo sent to the Planning
Department regarding City Council member Wachte'r's motion to
further study the question as to whether the City has adequate
zoning and land use to handle single-family/detached housing
demands.
SPERRY
Attached on page 3 is a copy of a letter from the Sperry
Corporation acknowled ing their receipt of the City's proposal.
Sperry has indicated that they are preparing a statement to be
submitted to the City and the two regional. newspapers, the
Minneapolis Star and Tribune and St. Paul Dispatch, regarding
comments that were made by Don Bruun. Apparently, Mr. Bruun had
accepted a position with the Honeywell Corporation and is no longer
employed at Sperry. According to the Sperry Corporation, normally
formal press releases are prepared by that department and given
to the newspapers. According to Sperry personnel this procedure
was not followed on the Eagan proposal.
GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON AIRPORT NOISE
Enclosed on page 1 is a copy of a newspaper article that
appeared in the February 12 edition of the Minneapolis Star and
Tribune regarding Governor Perpich's decision. to not accept the
recommendations of the Special Task Force on. Airport Noise at
this time.
NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/PLAY AREA ADJACENT TO DIFFLEY ROAD
Attached is a copy of correspondence between the Director of
Elementary Education and the County's Traffic Engineer regarding
a proposal to address the safety of the play area along County
Road 30. This letter is enclosed on page �/-� for your review.
LMC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
The City Administrator's office is making reservations for the
LMC Annual Conference in Duluth, on June 17-20. Since there is
a City's Council meeting on June 17, lodging reservations have
been made for the nights of the 18th and 19th. If members of
the City Council desire to attend this conference please let this
office know as soon as possible.
CABLE TELEVISION �-
Enclosed on page /�4Y is a copy of—a letter from Group W that
outlines seven new basic services for the Burnsville/Eagan system.
SURPLUS BRICKS
The City contacted Midwest Brick and Supply Company and established
a price of 6258 per thousand for the surplus brick. The contractor
for the Northwestern Bell switching station, which is located
adjacent to the old City Hall, was agreeable to the price and
has purchased 4,000 bricks. Believe it or not, there are still
bricks left over for the City to use for some other purpose.
The Maintenance crews have been advised to relocate the bricks
to a safer storage area until they can either be sold or used
for a City purpose in the future.
0
GENERAL REVENUE SHARING 0.
Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to the U.S. delegation regarding
General Revenue Sharing. A recent National League of Cities
newsletter requested that cities state their position on Federal
Revenue Sharing through correspondence by mayors. This:letter.,
is attached on pages /�43 through �_ attempted to outline
the use and benefit General Revenue Sharing dollars have provided
to this City.
MACTA
A copy of a. letter// /t�hat Mr. Bob Cooper received from, MACTA is
enclosed on page 2J�- Apparently, the Eagan report was shown
at the recent MACTA convention and is being distributed as a model
to other communities.
134
GOVERNOR PERPICH'S PROPOSED BUDGET CUT
Enclosed on page A4— is a copy of a letter from Speaker of
the House Dave Jennings that was addressed to city officials.
Also enclosed on page /217 is a copy of a print out that
illustrates the impact on he City of Eagan if the Governor's
budget cut is adopted. The City has budgeted approximately
$1,177,000 for 1986 and in reality would only receive $1,076,000
or an estimated $101,000 reduction in the appropriation. Obviously,
the impacts vary quite substantially between cities if you look
at the amount Duluth would lose under the Governor's budget cut.
Since all cities are in "wait and see" until the end of the session
there is no need for action to be taken at this time, however,
it may become necessary this spring to address some type of budget
adjustment or allocate reserves for the loss of revenue.
SBOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
The City has received a letter from the Dakota County Assessor's
office asking- that the City determine by February 28, a date for
the Board of Review meeting for 1986. The date that is being
suggested by the Dakota County Assessor's office is Wednesday,
May 28, 1986. If this meeting date is agreeable, the City Clerk's
office will so indicate to the Assessor's office.
HRA UPDATE
Enclosed on pagesthrough-Lj-7j is a copy of the most recent
status report for Assisted Housing Community Development
MLC UPDATE
Enclosed is a copy of the MLC update. You will note that the
amount under the Governor's budget reduction on page 3 of that
report varies slightly from the print out that was addressed earlier
in this memorandum. C-JQgeS 4krow1h
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
/--17
MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 1986
SUBJECT: DETACHED HOUSING STUDY
In official action that was taken by the City Council at a regular
meeting held on Tuesday, February 4, 1986, staff .was directed to
conduct a complete analysis of future single-family/detached
housing demands and needs for the community.
I would like your department to make such•an analysis and hopefully
have your study completed for review at one of the two March City
Council meetings. City Councilmember Wachter who was the author
of the motion is concerned about future demographics and whether
the City has adequate zoning and land use to handle the single-
family/detached housing demands that—could be placed on this
community.
Possibly information as provided by the Met Council and other
agencies could be helpful in compiling an analysis. Certainly
trends that are occurring in Eagan regarding the number of single-
family permits would be helpful and this data should be shared in
such an analysis. I reminded the City Council that statistical
data was provided at the Comprehensive Guide Update and again,
this information could be included in such a study.
If you have any questions, I would suggest contacting City Council -
member Wachter either through a meeting with myself or by telephone
so our 'study completely addresses his concerns.
City 'Adci�inis'- tr6toF "
cc: City Councilmember Ted Wachter
TLH/kf
�Ir
•
0
SPERRV CORPORATION
DEFENSE PRODUCTS GROUP
SPERRV PARK, P.O. BOX 64525
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55164-0525
TELEPHONE (612) 456-2222
February 7, 1986
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City Administrator.
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P. 0. Box 21199
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Dear Tom,
This is to acknowledge receipt of the City of Eagan's proposal providing
certain economic assistance should Sperry decide to consolidate some of its
business activities in Eagan. Your proposal was very professional and
states clearly the possibilities that exist. We appreciate the effort that
you and your staff and the members of the City Council expended to produce
such a concise document.
As discussed in our meeting on February 6, the object of the City's proposal
is to assist Sperry in coming to a decision in its facilities feasibility
study. With the City's proposal now in hand, Sperry will be able to
conclude such study and reach a decision on the overall issue of
consolidation. Hopefully, this final evaluation process will not take too
long.
We wish to convey our thanks to you, the
for your excellent efforts in this matter
study, Sperry looks to the continuance of
Sincerely,
E. T. Michaud
ETM/rbc
/39
officials of Eagan and your staff
Regardless of the outcome of the
our fine relationship.
' t -11-t e
Session '86 = ;-
Perpich_ .I.I:'=
disregard -
plan $r®m T3
-noise panel
} By Laurie Blake.''
I Staff Writer iirt�' t 'r1
Gov. Rudy Perpich has decided to -
ignore the recommendations of his
special Task Force on Airport Noise
and give the Metropolitan Airports
Commission another chance to im-
prove the airport noise problem, ac-
cording to Sandra Gardebring, head
of the task force: _ -
- Perpich did not accept the task'
._force's- primary., recommendallon,-.
that the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency- (MPCA),take a supervisory--_
.arole - In working with the airports
commission to reduce Jet noise over
the communities surrounding Minne-
apolis -St. Paul International Airport,
Gardebring said Tuesday. . .
Perpich believes the airports com-
mission has demonstrated a' new:
awareness of the problem and
i should be permitted to try to reduce
noise without the pressure of . the
MPCA.shesaid
c_i!:�.�'
The governor's office referred all
i questions on the task force report to
Gardebring,who also is chairwoman'.
of the Metropolitan Council. Te
The president of the South Metro
Airports Action Council, the anti -
noise citizens group, criticized Per.
pich. Frank Arlo said airport offl-.
cials have proven in the past that
they cannot control noises:,.u,C<;.
"I think the governor, by taking this'.
kind of stance, is saying at this point
the political process really refuses to
deal with a very serious economic
and environmental issue. The people
)n our area would have hoped we
• Noise cohtinued on page 4,R
-n..-�..j,.: -yam:, ;'ti •ti`
Of
Contlnued from page 1HE>'�
i 3
could count more significantly upon
Session '861
our elected officials to give us some, -
.
answers and some help with this,"',,.-
Arlo said ' } i "' t � ,, "
debring said. "' •' " " -
-
Rep Wes Skoglund, DFL•Mlnneapo- `Hamlet said the. airport Is planning
Its, and a task force member, also
three remedies to help reduce noise
criticized Perpich's declslon.•:"d!'••-=',
this summer. implement more strin-
gent restrictions on night use of the
"That's 'absolutely horrible: He is
airport, direct all training flights to .
selling out south Minneapolis, Rich-,
other airports and repeat noisesensi-
field and Bloomington if that Is true:'
tivity seminars for pilots and airline''
If IVs true It bolls my blood Skog-
controllers.
lund sald. ',: �,.- , :,, r' , -e.
, -,..d int,/ ri ;:v
ro, 1.
In the longer term, the airport com .. !
"'�'he first thing the go44einoi'ought.`_;
mission has a 17 -point plan for Im-,
to do is throw almost all of the com- '
proving the noise problem, Including'
misslonets' off the board. The envi. _
an extension of Runway 4.22 to allow
ronmental problem grew with all of'. `
for more evenly 'distributed airport
'them there and none of them did
traffic, and a study of the noise ceil-
'enything about It until literally thou-'.
Ing concept endorsed by. the task
'sands of people decided to say -force,
Hamielsaid .:�y.1.�;=...-'.,�� -
enough Skoglund said.,'
..7.vltun�
Perpich appointed the special task
n.. Mike Freeman. DFL -Richfield; '
force In October following a record -
,also a task force member, said he Is
breaking summer of resident com-
dlsappointed that the governor made
plaints about airport noise and gro
up his mind on the task force recom-
Ing cltlzen dissatisfaction with the
mendatlons before meeting with oth-
commission's a'etion on the problem. -'
er task force members. He and Skog- _ ;'
- ��••'• ` r�'.--/ -
lund have a meeting scheduled with. -
The governor asked the task force to
Perpich Tuesday.
review options for reducing noise
I
'-'
and report back to him with recom-
Jeff Hainig,,'�exeeutive�director of.
mendations for short-term and long -
the airports commission, said: "The--
term noise Improvements. In Janu-
message is clear. Gov. Perpich ex.,'
ary, the task force delivered a list of
pects the airport commission to pro--;.
17 ways to redufe noise y -
ceed aggressively in taking any ac-",":
tions we can to deal with this serious: _
The strongest recommendation 'was
Problem. We will do so ' :_. s
to Immediately place a cap on over-
-t,.'.
all noise (at Its 1984 level, to start.
I
Gardebring said Perpich-wants the
with) and order airlines to observe --
airports commission to submit a de-
this ceiling by either limiting flights
tailed report by May I on how It will
or using quieter planes. It said the
"proceed on the noise problem: "He
MPCA should work with the airports
has asked me to Impress upon them
commission to establish this noise .
the fact that he is expecting a real
ceiling and to set a schedule for `
demonstration of commltment," Gar- 'achieving
IL G, s -'t ` -I I
Of
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
14445 DIAMOND PATH
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 ■CALVIN E. ZWIEFEL
612-423-9400 DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
January 22, 1986
Mr. Peter L. Sorenson
Traffic Engineer, Dakota County
1560 Highway 55
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Mr. Sorenson:
4,,,.,. ,
�
i\t:. L,!�I U Jul•. i J .i l•i/
In response to your letter of October 12, 1985, we have reviewed the situation
at Northview Elementary School concerning the safety of the play area along
County Road 30. We have agreed to do the following as a result of our study:
1. 'Construct a 600' fence,at Northview School along County Road
30,.20' from the existing southern edge of the soccer field.
2. The height of the fence will be 6' and constructed of 9 gauge
chain link fencing:
3. As there are no activities in this play area during the winter
we will construct the fence as soon as the ground thaws in
early spring of 1986.
We appreciate your involvement in this matter and encourage you to contact us
if you have any additional concerns.
Sincerely,
Calvin Zwie el
Director of Elementary Education
CZ:nk
xc: Dr. Sanford Witter, Interim Superintendent
Dr. Ron Hoekstra, Deputy Superintendent -
Bob Ferguson, Principal, Northview Elementary
VTom Colbert, Director of Public Works, City of Eagan
GROUP
IV
CABLE
Group @ .',.I �'e. Inc A Subsidiary of
\VESI C31 (OUSE BROADCASTING AND CABLE. INC
4:65 SIGI.L! MEMOMAL HIGHWAY
Eki�N MN 55127 (G_': 894-2450
February 4, 1986
Ralph B. Campbell, III
Cable Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P o Box 21199
Eagan, MN 55121
Dear Ralph:
This letter is to inform you and the Cable Commission members that Group W
Cable is planning to launch seven new Basic services on the Burnsville/
Eagan system. These seven include:
- Arts and Entertainment
- Black Entertainment Television
- The Discovery Channel
- Country Music Television
- Financial News Network
- Trinity Broadcast Network
- Video Hits One
The proposed launch date for these channels is April 1, 1986. Channel
assignments will be determined in the near future.
nk you for your interest in these services and please feel free to contact
if you have any questions.
Cly,
JW. Camiers
General Manager
GROUP W CABLE
cc: Tan Hedges, Eagan City Administrator /
Linda Barton, Burnsville City Manager
l��
0
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. .P,0. BOX 21199 . _
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
VIC ELLISON
•
•'THEODORE WACHTER
February 7, 1986
COpnC11AABnwm
THOMAS HEDGES
CIN PAminlsfralor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
CiN Clerk
THE HONORABLE BILL FRENZEL
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
1026 LONGWORTH OFFICE BLDG
WASHINGTON D C 20515
Re: General Revenue Shari
Dear Representative F e"1:
I am writing this letter to encourage you to support the
continuation of the general revenue sharing program. There were
a number of reasons why this program was started in '1972 and
those reasons remain valid; consequently, the Federal
Government's commitment should also continue. In helping to
provide essential support for the nation's local governments in
meeting the costs of implementing national policies and in
assisting in the maintenance of services and facilities required
for economic growth, the program has proven to be efficient and
effective. The concept of using the Federal. Government's ability
to raise revenues in partnership with local governments' unques-
tioned knowledge of public demands for local government services
allows for the greatest possible use of limited resources.
The City of Eagan has used General Revenue Sharing funds for
acquisition, construction and improvement to major community
facilities, including the purchase of land, construction of a
police facility, partial funding of a municipal government center
and expansion of the maintenance garage. Other items of benefit
to the total community purchased with these funds include early
warning sirens and voting equipment. As a very rapidly growing
community, tremendous pressure is placed on City officials to
provide necessary infrastructure and essential governmental
services.
Given the value of the program to this City, the continued
validity of tax base sharing and limited ability to raise
replacement revenues locally, it is essential that this program
be continued.
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
February 7, 1986
Page Two
Thank you for your anticipated support in this matter. If you
would like any additional information or would like to discuss
the situation in more detail, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Zin
Beatta Blomquist
Mayor
cc: Representative Frenzel_s_Bloomington Office
BB/kf
SAME LETTER SENT TO:
SENATOR RUDY BOSCHWITZ, UNITED STATES SENATE
SENATOR DAVID DURENBERGER, UNITED STATES SENATE
Ll
Minnesota Association of Cable Television Administrators
3800 IDS Tower
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 343-1102
February 8, 1986
Mr. Robert Cooper
1472 Highview Avenue
Eagan, Minn. 55121
Re: MACTA Conference
Dear Bob:
Burnsville/Eagan, in my opinion, has taken the lead in the state as a
progressive Cable Television Commission. I think you gave examples of why
this is true in your presentation at the conference. We have just begun to
use the media as we should in governmental uses. Your session gave many of us
new ideas to use.
Thank you for your help and keep up the good work.
Yours truly, c
Peter E. Stleoi y�jo� "
MALTA, Conference Chair
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Robert G. Newby, Chair — South Washington County Cable Commission
Bootsie. Anderson, Vlce•Chair — North Suburban Cable Commission
Jan Haugen, Secretary — hake Minnetonka Cable Commission
Peter E.-Stolley, Treasurer — City of Northfield
Donald Melrme, Director — Quad Cities Cable Commission /
Betsy Pierce, Director — Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission
David M. Jennings
Speaker of the House
District 29A
Martin-Watonwan Counties
February 6, 1986
Dear City Official:
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
(Please share this letter with your mayor and council members.)
It was recently announced that our DFL governor, Rudy Perpich,
has underestimated state revenue collections by $734 million. To
make up for his error, Governor Perpich has proposed cutting
state aid payments to local units of government.
Your city's finances would be seriously impaired if the DFL
governor's plans are adopted. Not only would you see your local -
government -aid payments reduced, but homestead credits as well.
Governor Perpich is leaving locally -elected officials such as
yourself with little choice but to raise local real estate taxes.
That may solve the state's fiscal dilemma, but it does so by
transferring the problem to you at the local level.
The IR House majority intends to fight to protect our cities from
bearing the burden of the state's fiscal mismanagement. Your
assistance is necessary if we are to persuade the DFL governor
and Senate liberals that cities should be spared from cuts.
Please take a few minutes to call or write the DFL governor and
your local senator, and ask them to support the efforts of House
Independent -Republicans to balance the state budget by cutting
areas other than local -government aid.
We're going to fight to try and come through this current budget
problem without impairing the ability of local governments to
serve their citizens.
Sincerely,
David M ennings
Speaker of the House
rel r"'yj�J;Ei
01011L_.
2/ 3/86 0
PROJECTED IMPA• OF GOVERNOR PERPICH'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 1986 LGA CUT BY 8..1%, 1986 HOMESTEAD CREDIT
NOTE: '86 homestead credit amounts are projected based on very limited data. Check with
CUTS
(HC) CUT BY 8.78%
county auditor for better estimatE
NAME
1986 LGA
1986 LGA
I EST 1986 HC
EST 1986 HC
I EST TOTAL 186
EST TOTAL 186
EST $ LOf
BEFORE
AFTER
I BEFORE
AFTER
I LGA + HC
LGA + HC
DUE TO Ll
CUTS
8.1% CUT
I CUTS
8.8% CUT
I BEFORE CUTS
AFTER CUTS
& HC CUl
DULUTH
11,784,789
10,830,655
1 3,463,170
3,159,104
1 15,247,959
13,989,759
1,258,24
DUMONT
14,750
13,556
1 2,299
2,097
8,074
1 17,049
1 31,676
15,653
29,051
1,3'.
2,&
DUNDAS
22,825
5,287
20,977
4,859
1 8,851
1 1,004
916
1 6,291
5,775
5:
DUNDEE
DUNNELL
21,175
19,461
1 7,082
6,460
1 28,257
25,921
2,3:
.EAGAN, „,. , ; , a =;:315, 094 •.::::..;:Fi..
289, 583 ,;
I 862, 665
:_, _, _ _. ,, 786, 923
I _, ,,.,; 1, 177, 759 ._
1 122,722
,, . _ 1, 076, 506
112,563
101, 2:
10,1:
EAGLE BEND
LAKE
90,097
80,0224
82,802
73,545
1 32,625
1 67,707
29,761
61,762
1 147,731
135,307
12,41
EAGLE
EAST BETHEL
131,713
121,049
1 79,812
72,805
1 211,525
193,854
17,6;
EAST GRAND F
859,575
789,981
1 330,353
301,348
1 1,189,928
1,091,329
98,5'
EAST GULL LA
4,263
3,918
I 2;861
2,610
91983 II
I 7,124
39,981
6,528
36,669
5
3,3
EASTON
\ ECHO
29,037
56,766.-
26,686
52,170
1 10,944
1 15,797
14,410
1 72,563
66,580
5,9;
EDEN PRAIRIE
306,875
282,029
1 785,966
716,958
1 1,092,841
1 125,544
998,987
115,235
93,8'
10,3'
V EDEN VALLEY
104,490
96,030
1 21,054
1 65,932
19,205
60,143
1 139,724
127,961
11,7
EDGERTON
EDINA
73,792
550,444
67,818
505,878
1 1,139,697
1,039,632
1 1,690,141
1,545,510
144,6
EFFIE
1,787
5,408
1,642
4,970
1 0
1 14,195
0
12,949
1 1,787
1 19,.603
1,642
17,919
1
I,6'
EITZEN
ELBA
15969
1,810
1 1,332
1,215
I 3,301
3,025
2
ELBOW LAKE
176,070
161,815
1 60,661
55,335
1 236,731
217,150
19,5
ELGIN
49,387
45,388
1 26,554
24,223
3,362
1 75,941
1 18,119
69,611
16,626
6,2
1,4
ELIZABETH
ELK RIVER
14,433
291,986
13,264
268,346
1 3,686
1 167,205
152,524
1 459,191
420,.870
38,-
ELKO
7,460
6,856
1 6,815
6,217
1 14,275
13,073
1,E
ELKTON
8,935
8,212
1 5,359
4,888
14,,010
1 14,294
1 72,260
13,100
66,305
1,1
5,c
ELLENDALE
ELLSWORTH
56,902
67,201
52,295
61,760
1 15,358
1 20,513
18,712
1 87,714
80,472
7,E
ELMDALE
1,276
1,173
73,453
1 2,405
1 34,989
2,194
31,917
1 3,681
1 114,913
3,367
105,370
9,`_
ELMORE
ELROSA
79,924
4,512
4,147
1 8,768
7,998
1 13,280
12,145
1,1
ELY
571,409
525,146
1 1722,945
157,760
1 744,354
682,906
61,E
ELYSIAN
71,783
65,971
1 16,066
14,655.
1 87,849
80,626
7,F
EMILY
15,791
14,.513
1 15,957
14,556
1 31,748
29,069
2,(
EMMONS
59,113
54,327
1 14,369
13,107
1 73,482
67,434
6,4
DAKOTA COUNTY
HRA
flu IN
nunnw
Serving People and Communities
MEMORANDUM
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496 -145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred
Joy, County Administrator; and D�a}kkota County Planning Department
FROM: Mark Ulfers, Executive Director'/IJ��NAU11�� S
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSIUNG AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: February 6, 1985
Enclosed are the January Status Reports for all the Assisted Housing Programs in
Dakota County and the Community Development Programs administered by the Dakota
County HRA. ,
If you would like additional information on any of the programs, please feel
free to call me.
Enclosure
Iq
"AN FnllAI nOGnDTI D,nr cuoi MVC1'-
•
Brief description of assisted housing programs:
Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of
Their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti-
lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or
South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal
inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by
the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits.
2. Moderate Rehab,: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners
of rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring
their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner,
in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent
Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota
County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8
Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer
available.
3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy
for construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent
these units to eligible low and moderate -income households. The rental
payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve-
lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in
place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects
for senior citizens.
4. Low Rent Housing: The Dakota County HRA,(or South St., Paul HRA) owns and
manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program.
These housing.units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house-
holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an
established allowance for utilities) for rent.
5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and
moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer
available.
• 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc-
tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units
to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for
tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in
place, this program is no longer available.
��y
* South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 Existing and Low Rent Housing Programs.
^0YvOTA CC_'NTY AS5I57EU
CiSING R -701T JA`J19Y,
1345
I `E:TIO`: 8 1
"3"E3ATT I
3
,c, i
EIIIG""13 1
RES AE
'''C
rnV
vOViT?ES
- N TP'
:'O 'A-ILY 701- _
1
' n =ov. y
TO .
9
P'
° -Y
T 3io_'
_ q
•v_
LY
i9'
r V
_1:.
-
------------------------I------------------I---------00000000-----------
" VAL_eY
I U 42 53 1
2 0
2
8
=
I ------------------I------------------------------------------
`°
e•
3 f
Z
--- ---------------------I------0000--
----
0000- - I-
000
0000-- --
-
0----!0000--
0000--
- -----!-
0000---0000--
-0000--0000-'
�------0000--I-------------0000-'
. VIL'_E
58 123 161 1
'---------------`-!---------------------
2 0
n
2,
17
G
„7 :
'00------------
R
-S
c.,
_.,
0
-------- ---
:30
'0000--------I
1 58
-----------0000--
4
------------------------
p3CX
I----------------
1 32 'S^ 1°4
0 2
"
73
3' 1
2
;5
:° !
2
i44
R
I-------
35r'
..--------
335
-----------------------
?4':\STC!'
------------------I------------------i--
! 22 48 72 1
2 2
-----------------
7;
- :
------------
..-----------------------'----------------I----------------'----------------'---------------`-------...---0000--
143 ---
4 M1
„ ,
-
23
3
:23
,
E
�_ -----0000--
..I..
-----
-0000--0000-----0000---I----.
:\VAR GROVE HEIGHTS
-- -------------i---0000--00000000-,
'c7 18?. '03
2 0
2 I
2
. _ -'0000-
2
:-.
..----_-----
2
_ -!_
-------�--
3:
-- ------0
2*-
r'.'.'
—
41'
—
------------------------------------------I------------------'------
------------------------
---
-----
----------
_.._..
...-------- -------'---�0000
LILYOAL=
-------._.__.
2 2 0!
0 2
0 1
2
2
—'I
0
0
0
0
__._
........._
- -
—
------------------------
'E`!f OSA
------------------'--------------
2 3!
2 0
----I---'-----;0000--
0 I
2
2
___0000--_.._
0!
1
0
-
--..._....._
0
`+EYOOTq HE15HT5
k - 0 - 7 ,A
--------------
0
12
—
—
I
13
:3
---
------------------------I
3CSE"p'NT
V2 ------------------
3 3 319 I
------------------
2 0
2
3
'57
2
J`
!
`
z
I---- ---
43
0
-I---------
'1°
----._...:
"
-----------------------I----------------•-!------------------
;L'TH ST. ^A'JL
3S 134 ±70 1
2 0
2
------------------
8
44
I--
44 1
-----------
.'.22.
2
...----
322 !
------------
5::
------------------------
I------------------
------------------
i------------------
I-------------------------------
'------------
--------
-------
---
: .
- --- ---- - -
ST. PAL-
OT.
1-00000000---0000--I------0000
- -- 1
153 353 I
0 6
I---0000--
6 I
I-------0000--
0
---
0
I------0000--
0
82
7
I------------I-------0000-'-------------------
87
-- -
2
------0000--1--0000--
?
0000--
i 274
_7i
--- '
\
------0000--
7 Ela
-- --.
I------0000-- -�-
--
1 6 7 1
-0000-- ---
0 0
-�6
2
0
0
- 0-------------------i
II
2 1
0
2
0 1
------------------------'------------------------------------------------------1------------------'-----------------------!-----
-------0000—i
-
TOTALS
------ --------------
I I
1 463 1250 15^c4 1
I
I------------------ I-----------
4 21
------
I
25 I
I
I------------------
247
x23
I
547 1
I
I------------------
332
174
1
554 1
I
I
!------------
41
1 526
I
I
I -00000000---I-----0000----0000-`
1
!?-j4
"'P.=
32:5 ;
I
I
* South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 Existing and Low Rent Housing Programs.
Brief description of Community Development Programs:
1. Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and
Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low-
income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious
fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high.heating
costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising
utility bills.
2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State
program as'a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners
(adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items
and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is
charged depending on the applicant's income.
3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income
homeowners adjusted gross income under $7,000 annually) for rehabilitation
items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and
accessibility of the home. The interest rate is 3% and deferred loans are
available to households with—adjusted gross incomes under $6,000 annually.
This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the
Dakota County HRA.
4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for
energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross
incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with
adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi-
nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
5. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental
units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot
exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one
unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The
interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the
Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
• 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done
using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and
moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low
interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program
is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given .to eligible low and moderate
income homeowners for energy items. The eligible homeowners are referred
from Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco. This program is admi-
nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc-
tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the
property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some
types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and
residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%.
This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the
Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas.
/ItV
AMOTA COUNTY RAA COYJAMITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT MY 1976 -JANUARY 1986
I HfATHERIMIJON MITA HDME IMPAAV LOAN MIIAA HOME REHAB LOAN MHFA HOME ENERGY LOAN
[MnVIT!5S I ELD EAM TOTAL ELD LO 54 TOTAL ELD LG 51 TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL
----- _------- 1____I_—_I----- --- _I____I—_I----- _--_I____I____
.IPPLE VALLEY 1 3 1 67 1 73 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I 1 1 4 1
___-________I ----- I___,_1__—_ __—I ----- 1 ----- I---- ___ I_____ I____I___ _ I_—I----- I_____
PURN5V!!- 1 15 1 127 1 142 0 1 i 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 4 1 5 P 1 0! 2 1 2
_____.------- I _. ___I----- I----- ----- I_____I----- I ----- _____I_____ 1_____ I ----- ____j____1____ I ----
CANNON =XI -5 I 1 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 fl 1 0 1 1 1 1
CPGTLE ?OCH I 2 1 4 1 4 . 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 I I 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 P I 0
.____G_^ -PN _____--___I____I__+ _ _-1 ----- 1---- I_—_ ---- I ---- I --- I----- ----- I ---- I ---- I -----
c 1 4 1 51 1 `6 0 I 1 1 5 1 6 3 1 1 1 2 1 61 1 1 1 5 1 7
--- ----! ----- I ----- I ----
FP3X!'STON 2a i :05 1 Its 0 1 2 1 7 1 9 2 1 1 1 4 1 7 2 1 1 1 13 1 Is
_
--- __________1____1__.__1_____ ____1____1____1_____ ____I_ --- I__—I----- ______I___I_—_
HAST'N53 1 43 1 124 1 167 5 1 6 1 21 1 32 21 1 4 1 11 1 36 1 1 2 1 3 1 6
HANFT]N ! I1 !6 0 1 2 1 21 2 3! 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 0 1 P 1 0
___1-____ —_! ----- I_____ I____ ___ I ---- I----- 1_--- _____ I____ I_____ I__--
!N7CR SRIVEI 20 1101 1 - 7 1 4 1 IPI 17 4 1 2 1 IS I 21 0 0 1 6 1 6
--------------- 1 ----- I____I___ _____1_____1____I_____ _ 1 ----- 1 ----- 1—__ ----- 1 ----- 1 ---- 1____
LPRE1^'LE 1 16 1 04 1 122 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 0 1 0 1 3 3
!-- aI 2I 2 AI PI 0I a PI PI BI 0 0I 0I AI 0
NG9E'CCTA 1 2 1 z' 4 2 1 a l 0 1 2 2 1 6 1 2 1 2 e 1 0 1 0
'.E GTS '.'ETGH"i 2 i :a IB a I 1 1 2 1 3 3 1 a 1 2 1 5 1 4-,-. '_,-- 6
MIESVIL! E i 1 1 1 1 2 P I P I 0 1 0 P I 0 1 0 1 0 P I 2 1 0 1
NOATH'C`SJ' S 1 1P I 15 B 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 B 1 P 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
- AA'f?YA 1 0 1 D I P x l P I 0 1 P P I B B! P P 2 1 ! I
- I! a 01 11 II 2
R ------H - 2 9! 1 1 1 1 2 P 1 0 1 x
.L .._. !-�°3 ---- -__ I__ —I___a I___� __P i—� '__^ 1___� __ a 16
ROS—OUNIT 1 9 1 65 7 J 1 1 1 6 1 7 6 1 0 1 2 1 6 0 1 J 15
S'UTH "T.^^L'L 7' 1 0
______;_____ I___. 1_____ ._ —_; _____I_I____ _____I____I_____1_ _____ I
^•`'- ^3C I x! I P A
v": .'7111 1 , I n l 4 a! 0 1 x 1 2 P I 111 a! I r I
----- ----1'--'I----I---------1---I-----1----- ---I
L
:;--
-_^- -----+ 72 • c 6 ' 31 1 57 14 1 6 �I ISI 35 5 1 P 1 5
I I I I I I I I ! I I
I 1 I I I 1 I
707AL5 L77 f^72 .:7:5 71 I 27 I 94 I '42 61 I 16 I SBI 135 !0 I 6 I 62 I 71
I I I ! I I I I I I
! I 1 1 I I I
RENTAL REHAB LOAN COBS REHAB LOAN 0000 REHAB LOAN - YR, YHFA SOLAR PP,NR LOAN 312 '_OPIIS I
ELD LG SM TOTA'_ ELD LG SN TOT?'_ CLO LG 54 TOTW_ ELD L'.- BM TOTP_ -. CAr S.F.: C0C1 ElO TOTALI
AI 21 01 P 01 BI PI 'J PI 01 PI PI 21 21 JI PI x: di 2:
_____ -----1___—I___-_I _____ -----
01 el 01 0 11 01 31 4 AI PI 21 2 a 01 al 0 a! al
----- ____I_____I_____I_____ _____1___1___1_____ _____ I ----- --------- . ...... I
01 BI 01 0 01 PI 01 P 'al PI PI r 01 21 01 2 -PI CI PI 'dl PI
01 PI 01 0 01 01 01 P PI 01 Pi P -PI 21 81 0 A! PI al PI P;
BI 01 01 a 11 11 d 71 d: el 1 7! DI a. x -- a'
01 BI 01 0 71 11 41 12 dl al JI 51 OI al 7. xi 2 I II
-
---1------- -----1-----1----1----- - 1---- ----I-'--- 1----1----1--- -
4 1 1 1 5 1 It 17 I 1 1 10 30 0 I A! T a- P -I P 4 1
4 1 I -_ ---_-_ I - '—± - I
____I----- I----
____I___I____1----- ___ I_ -___I__— ----- _—__
PI PI 01 0 21 11 !I 2
1 2
flI2
A P P 1 1 4 1 B I '3 A! 1 1 x i 2 a 1 2 2 1
1
AI PI al r 41 01 21 fi 2121 PI x 21 1'. JI .- DI 21 al '21 BI
___. ----- _____1 _____I__ --q ____ .____i_—
1 P -
PI AI PI 1 1! 2!
1 1 2 1 2 1 ! 2 1 IP -- ----- ------L--- ----
B
--�__-_ - - ,—.
I
81 el P! 0 01 PI BI P BI AI PI a PI 2I PI a DI P! al
_____ ----- I_____1____1 ---- .. ----- 1____1____1----- _____1_____I_____;_____ _____,-
•---i-
L____ -----1___-1___n I___1_ _I__ _I____I—^ .__, I___A I____I__ ----- ----
_- -----
_-_ _____
I I I 1
'_
____ ---- --- -
-_,
1 4 0 1 P!---- --
I-----------1 -' '- 1- I I B -'---'1- a l E
P ,_—__ -----
----- ----------- I
J --- ----- ----- ---- ---- - 1 --- ---1---_'1___2 11-- ----- N 1---1----_1-----I
-----r-------------I-- I I I - I P 0 1 10 I
I — -
19 1 P• I 13 1 °° 5 I Is l 54 1 12s 0 1 a l 0 1 0 8 1 0 I 2 1 2 ! I
1 I I I I 1
I
24 1 ! 1 IBI 43 e7 1 31 1 95 1 CI a l P I 2 1 2 d l -3
I I .
---
— ------ _—_ ----- -- ---------------------
-
'MH - Mobile Home ',
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
Vol. III, No. 1 - February 1986
MLC Update Changes Focus
Update has changed. This issue marks the beginning of the third
year Update has been published by the Municipal Legislative Com-
mission. During the past two years the primary audience of Update
was the mayors and city council members of the 15 MLC member
cities. Beginning with this issue„ the primary audience will
be the 23 state representatives and 15 state senators that
comprise the MLC Legislative Delegation.
Several months ago, the MLC Communications Subcommittee chaired
by Jim Willis, City Manager of Plymouth, recommended to the MLC
that the focus of Update be shifted to the legislative delegation.
The objective of this publication is to inform legislators of
MLC's legislative program and the key issues of concern to our
suburbs. It will also serve as a vehicle to disseminate informa-
tion about our cities and the individuals that run these cities.
Update will provide legislators with information that specifically
addresses the cities they represent.
• In this issue, articles have been included that discuss the
effects of the Governor's proposed cuts in local government
aid and homestead credit, a summary of the 1986 policy resolu-
tions adopted by the MLC Board of Directors at the January
Board Meeting, a profile of the new MLC City Inver Grove Heights
and a background piece on Minnetonka City Manager James Miller
who is the new President of the League of Minnesota Cities.
Update will be published monthly during the legislative session
ann monthly during the interim. The MLC lobbyist, Larkin,
Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., is responsible for its publica-
tion.
Distribution of Update will include the 38 legislators 'who are
members of the MLC Legislative Delegation, legislative leadership,
Mayors and city council members from our 15 cities, the Capitol
and suburban press, and individuals and organizations that deal
with local government issues.
If any reader has suggestions for changes or comments, please
contact Jim Willis at 559-2800.
/.�3
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
rage
Governor's Budget Reduction Plan Cuts Suburban Aid
Governor Perpich announced his budget reduction recommendations
on January 23. The Legislature, facing a $734 million revenue
shortfall, must balance the budget before the 1986 Legislative
Session adjourns.
The Governor's recommended cuts will have a serious affect on
local governments. In October, MLC President, Burnsville
Mayor Connie Morrison, sent the Governor, legislative leadership 7
and members of the MLC Legislative Delegation a letter stating.
that the MLC would be willing to share in balancing the State's
budget, but that the cuts should be uniform and fair. The MLC
policy was, and continues to be, that budget cuts should be across-
the-board.
Although the Governor announced that all budgets would be cut an
uniform 3.5 percent (except for school aids, which is to be cut
2.5 percent), the fact is that 1986 local government aid previously
committed to the 15 MLC suburbs will receive an 8.86 percent cut.
In addition, MLC cities will receive a 9.76 percent reduction in
the homestead credit payments. The reason these cuts are greater
than 3.5 percent is because the Governor's recommendation of 3.5
percent is against the biennial appropriation. Since one year of
the biennium has already passed, local government aid and home-
stead credit cuts have to be doubled. However, a 7 percent cut •
of 1986 local government aid pays amounts to $21 million, not
the $25.2 million the Governor is recommending. The Governor's
recommendation adds an additional $4..2 million to the local
,government aid cut. The rationale, which makes little sense,
is that this additional amount equals a 3.5 percent cut of
miscellaneous aids and credits such as the'native prairie credit,
wetlands credit, agricultural preservation credit, etc. These
aids and credits were not cut.
The Governor's budget recommendation also cut the homestead credit
$51.1 million when in fact a 3.5 percent reduction in the home-
stead credit appropriation would equal $39.4 million. An addi-
tional $11.7 million cut was added to the homestead credit. The
Governor's budget explains that this $11.7 million represents a
3.5 percent cut in the renter credit and circuit breaker programs.
Renters credit and the property tax refund (circuit breaker)
program were not cut, but their share of the cut was added to
the homestead credit program.
QI
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
Governor's Budget Reduction Plan (continued)
Page 3
The net result is that local units of government will be cut
2.6.3 percent more than the 7 percent they had expected. On
a statewide average, instead of being cut,$60.4 million, local
governments are being asked to absorb an additional $15.9 million
cut which the MLC does not deem to be fair or equitable.
The following chart shows.the effects of the Governor's recommenda-
tions on MLC cities.
15 MLC SUBURBS
Total- Coveuiunent Aid And
Hcnestead Credit Reductions Under
The Governor's revised Budget Proposal
• Cuts would be made fon 1986 homestead credit amounts, however, the amrciunt certified
is not yet available, therefore, 1985 homestead credit aid paynents are used is a'
reasonable approximation.
Source: Senate Cc nsel and research
156
February 1986
1985•
Homestead
1986
1986 total
Homestead
Credit
Total Aid 6
Local Aid
Aid Curt
Credit
Cut
Credit Cuts
Bloomington
2,708,609
220,514
2,284,744
203,342
423,856
Brooklyn Park
1,993,175
162,269
1,247,666
111,042
273,311
Burnsville
1,597,171
130,029
1,267,911
112,844
242,873
•
Eagan
315,094
25,652
817,379
72,746
98,399
Fden Prairie
306,875
- 24,983
726,875
64,691
89,675
Fdina
550,444
44,813
936,124
83,315
128,128
Inver Grove Heights
668,734
54,443
514,426
45,783
100,227
Maple Grove
595,761
48,502
874,982
77,873
126,375
Maplewood
1,429,525
116;381
711,559
63,328
179,709
Minnetonka
1,581,580
126,760.
1,286,740
-114,519
243,280
Plynouth
387,414
31,540
875,604
77,928
109,469
Roseville
803,071
65,380
730,075
64,976
130,356
Shoreview
424,905
34,592
368,101
32,761
67,353
White Bear fake
946,081
77,022
462,734
41,183
118,206
Woodbury
480,977
39,157
369,446
32,880
72,038
TOTAL
14,789,416
1,204,037
13,474,366
1,199,211
2,403,255
• Cuts would be made fon 1986 homestead credit amounts, however, the amrciunt certified
is not yet available, therefore, 1985 homestead credit aid paynents are used is a'
reasonable approximation.
Source: Senate Cc nsel and research
156
February 1986
MUNICIPAL Page 4
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION,
MLC Annual Legislative Dinner
More than 90 individuals attended the Third Annual MLC
Legislative Dinner -that was held.January '15 at the Decathlon
Club in Bloomington.
Twenty-two legislators that represent the MLC cities along
with 5.4 MLC city officials were present at this event.The
mayor, city manager and council members from the Cities of
Inver; Grove Heights and Lakeville were guests.
The evening provided an excellent opportunity for local
elected officials to speak with their legislators. It
also provided the Commission the occasion to formally
present MLC's 1986 Legislative Resolutions which have
been summarized in this issue of Update.
The keynote speaker was House Speaker David Jennings, who
outlined the upcoming legislative agenda, focusing his
remarks on the budget shortfall that the State of Minnesota
faces. He acknowledged MLC's concerns regarding the expected
budget cuts and how these cuts could possibly affect their
cities and local government aid. He also reassured the
Commission that he was committed to arriving at an equitable
solution..to the state's _financial problem.,
Following the event, the members of the Commission and the
Legislative Delegation commented that they found the evening
both enjoyable and informative and looked forward to scheduling
similar events in the future.
14
A
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
MLC Board of Directors Adopts 1986 Legislative Resolutions
The MLC Board of Directors adopted the following four legislative
resolutions for the 1986 Session at their board meeting which was
held on January 15:
Local Government Aid Polic
The MLC supports a continuation of the LGA formula
enacted in 1985. It does not support changes to
this formula during the 1986 Session.
Budget Reduction Policy
4 Since the State of Minnesota is currently facing a
budget deficit, the MLC believes that all recipients
of state appropriations should share equally in any
necessary budget cuts. However, the MLC will oppose
any cutbacks which place an excessive amount of
budget reductions on local units of government.
1987 Local Government Aid Appropriation Policy
The MLC resolves that the 1987 Local Government Aid
appropriation amount be increased by at least 68 more
than the 1986 appropriation amount. And if reductions
in 1986 Local Government Aid are necessary, any per-
centage increase for 1987 should be computed on the
restored 1986 base amount.
1986 Legislative Policy
The MLC defines its 1986 legislative program, con-
centrating their efforts on Local Government Aid,
property tax relief programs such as homestead
credit, budget reductions affecting cities, and
other issues which may have fiscal impact on its
membership._
157
MUNICIPAL Page 16
LEGISLATM
COMMISSION
Inver Grove Heights Joins MLC
The MLC is pleased to announce that Inver Grove Heights has
become ,the most recent city to join the Commission_ Inver
Grove Heights' decision to participate in the Commission has
increased MLC membership to currently include 15 municipalities.
Inver Grove Heights shares similar demographic characteristics.
goals and objectives with the other MLC communities, and their
membership will undoubtedly strengthen MLC's voice and impact
on such legislation as to calgovernment aid, tax policy and
other financial issues.
Inver Grove Heights
Profile
City Officials
Mayor:
Council Members:
City Manager:
City Attorney:
Address:
Telephone Number:
William Saed
Bernie Beermann
Ken Henderson
George Tourville
Sid Puppe
Bob Schaefer
Tim Quntz
Inver Grove Heights
8150 Barbara Avenue
Inver Grove' Heights,
612/457-2111
City Government Authority: Statutory
Terms of Office
V-1
LJ
City Hall
East
Minnesota 5507
Mayor:
2 years
Council Members:
4 years____
1986 Population Estimate':
18,940
1986 City Mill Rate:
21.62
Average Assessed Value
Per Capita:
$5,696
1986 LGA:
$668,734
1986 LGA Per Capita:
$35.31
Legislators:
Representative James
Metzen (DFL)
545 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota
55155
612/296-4370
Senator Conrad Vega
(DFL)
G-29 State Capitol
St. Paul, Minnesota
55155
612/296-4101
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
MLC City Manager Becomes
League of Minnesota Cities President
Page 7
James Miller, Minnetonka's City Manager, officially assumed his
position as President of the League of Minnesota Cities' Board
of Directors in January 1986.
Miller acknowledged that his responsibilities during this one-
year term will be demanding, especially during a time when the
State of Minnesota is facing a budget shortfall. Miller called
for the cooperation of government officials on every level to
help resolve this difficult situation in a fair and equitable
manner.
Miller was first elected to serve on the League's Board of
Directors in 1983, and was elected Vice President in June 1985.
`?r Miller has been actively involved in the League for several
years, serving on the League's Personnel Committee, Budget
Committee and on the joint NAHRO-League Industrial Revenue
Bond Task Force.
Miller was one of the chief founders and driving forces behind
the establishment of the Municipal Legislative Commission. He
served as MLC's first Vice .Chair and held this position for two
years. Presently, he is on the Commission's Local Government
Finance Subcommittee and the Development Finance Subcommittee.
Miller sees no conflict of interest regarding his involvement in
both the MLC and the League of Minnesota Cities. He believes
that these organizations compliment each other, and that their
combined efforts increase their effectiveness and help both
organizations achieve their goals.
Miller is also active in other organizations. He is a board
member of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and
belongs to several national and international city managers'
associations.
Prior to his position as the City Manager of Minnetonka,
Miller was the assistant city manager in Des Moines,Iowa
and Janesville, Wisconsin for three years each. Miller
holds two masters and a doctoral degree in public
administration and taught public administration at
Drake University.
/5q
MUNICIPAL Page 8
LEGISLATM
COMMISSION
MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings Scheduled in March
The MLC Board of Directors unanimously decided to -schedule three
MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings during the 1986 Legislative
Session and invite the MLC Legislative Delegation to participate.
It was the Board's belief that these breakfast meetings be held
in lieu of the "Day at the Legislature" since it would provide
city officials a better opportunity to meet with their legislators
to discuss legislative priorities and issues of concern to their
communities.
In order to create an environment conductive to effective inter-
action and discussion, the MLC cities have been divided into three
smaller regions. Letters will be sent to legislators in the near
future, inviting them to attend the breakfast meeting that
corresponds to the region they represent.
Please note the following MLC Regional Breakfast Meeting Schedules:
EAST REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING
Maplewood, Roseville, Shoreview,
White Bear Lake, Woodbury
Date and Time: Tuesday, March 4 - 7:45 a.m.
Location: Shoreview Plaza Hotel (Hamline Room)
1000 Gramsie Road, Shoreview
(One block north on Lexington, off
of 694, one block east on Gramsie Road)
Representatives: Bennett, Kostohryz, Price, Rose, Stanius,
Valento and Voss.
Senators: Diessner, Dieterich, Hughes, Knaak and
Novak.
MUNICIPAL Page 9
LMISLATI' ,-
COMMISSION
MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings (continued)
NORTHWEST REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING
Brooklyn Park,
Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth
Date and Time: Wednesday, March 5 - 7:45 a.m.
Location: Plymouth Radisson Inn (Goldflower Room A)
2705"N6rth Annapolis Lane, Plymouth
(Corner of 494 -and 55)
Representatives: Clausnitzer, Ellingson, Heap, Knickerbocker,
Olsen, Scheid, Schreiber and Shaver.
Senators: Jude, Luther, McQuaid, Olson and Ramstad.
SOUTHWEST REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING
Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan,
Eden Prairie, Edina, Inver Grove Heights
Date and Time: Wednesday, March 12 - 7:45 a.m.
Location: Decathlon Club (Javelin Room)
7800 Cedar Avenue South, Bloomington
(Off of 494, take the Portland/12th Avenue
Exit)
.Representatives: Blatz, Forsythe, Halberg, Himle, Knickerbocker;
Metzen, Pauly, Riveness and Seaberg.
Senators: Belanger, Freeman, Knutson, Olson,, Storm and
Vega.
MUNICIPAL
COMMISSION
MLC Facts
MLC LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
7 DFL State Representatives
16 IR State Representatives
8 DFL State Senators
7 IR State Senators
38 MLC State Legislators Total
/6 v
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
FAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department D. Public Works Department
Ppio B. Police Department 'pZQE. Cable Commission
1,10 C. Parks & Recreation Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
2-1 A. Contractor Licenses
7.3 B. Personnel Items
F175 C. Correction of March 5, 1985, City Council minutes
Z 6 D. Contract 84-13, Final Payment/Acceptance, Water Booster Station
ZOO E. Project 427, Resolutions Restricting Parking (Yankee Doodle
Road, T.H. 13 to Federal Drive)
Z F. Project 467, Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize Public Hearing
a (Wescott Road - Lexington to 1/2 Mile East)
22f
p.G. Contract 85-02, Final Payment/Acceptance, Peaceful Heights
(Streets & Utilities)
p,Zq H. Contract 84-08, Final Payment/Acceptance, Westbury & Lexington
Square (Streets & Utilities)
29 I. Contract 85-03, Change Order #1, Slaters Acres (Street &
1 f Utilities)
;.„_:32) J. Contract 85-07, Change Order #1, Eagandale/Lemay Lake (Streets &.
Utilities)
�.3t K. Project 470, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report
(Greensboro Addition - Streets & Utilities)
S/L. Project 471, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (West
Service Road - Storm Sewer)
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
Q,3Z A. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road (Streets -.Beau de
Rue to Kings Road - Continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
P.3 B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview
a Meadows Addition - Continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
�.3 T C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue Gentian
Road - Continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
t�0 D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 411 (Lillian McCarthy - Trunk
Storm Sewer, Continued from February 4; 1986, meeting)
E. Public Hearing, Vacation of Utility Easement for Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, Knob Hill of Eagan
1
VI. 'OLD BUSINESS
P, A. Preliminary Plat Revision, Northview Meadows (Sienna
Corporation/Rod Hardy) Located South of Diff ley Road Between
Lexington Avenue and Dodd Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 26
B. Park Consultant Appointment and Fee Schedule Consideration
(continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
C. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission
(continued from February 4, 1986, meeting)
p,Jrf D. Conditional Use Permit for Utility Building, Northwestern Bell
1 Telephone, Located South of County Road 30 (Diff ley Road) and
West of Dodd Road, NW 1/4 of Section 25 (continued from January
21, 1966, meeting)
p 77, E. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single -Family Lots on 40 Acres and a
Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) -
Greensboro/Dave Gabbert, Located in the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of
Section 14, North of Wescott Road and West of Lexington Avenue
�.76 F. Public Works Garage Final Concept Design
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Review of On -Sale Liquor License Policy
I �,9 B. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 9.5 Acres and Con-
taining 144 Apartment Units (Stuarts's First Addition - Stuart
Nolan) Located on Outlots A & B, Tomark 2nd Addition, South of
Yankee Doodle Road and East of Lexington Avenue, NW 1/4 of
Section 14
/60 C. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximate 5 Acres & Containing
T. 1 Lot and a Rezoning from PD (Planned Development - Lexington
Place PD) to PF (Public Facilities) Advent United Methodist
Church, Located South of Westbury Drive and West of Lexington
Avenue, NE 1/4 of Section 22
1/%i D. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 2.1 Acres and
P Containing 1 Strip Commercial Facility with 18,620 S.F. Strip/
Retail Center and a Conditional Use Permit for a Drive-Thru
Restaurant Facility and a Pylon Sign (K Charles Development
Corporation) Located South of Duckwood Drive and East of
Krestwood Lane, NW 1/4 of Section 15
/Z 3 E. Conditional Use Permit for Above -Ground Liquid Storage Tanks
(Airco Industrial Gases) Located on 2.3 Acres on Lot 5 of Robert
O'Neill Homestead, Located North of T.H. 55 and Dodd Road, SE
1/4 of Section 2
�3a F. Site Plan Review (Eagan Center/Mark Ravich) Located East of
Lexington Avenue and South of County Road 30, SE 1/4 of Section
23
VIII. '/ ADDITIONAL ITEMS
p, 134 A. Contract 86-5, Approve Plans and Specifications (Windtree 5th
1 and 6th Additions
B. Contract 86-7, Approve Plans and Specifications (O'Neil Pond)
IR. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
R. ADJOURNMENT
0
,'s
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE-MINUTES
After approval is given to the February 18, 1986, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the February 4 and special minutes
for the January 14; January 23, and February 13 meetings, the fol-
lowing items are in order for consideration:
A. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. Fire Chief Childers is requesting special consideration to
refurbish the 1971 C-900 Ford pumper truck. This item was discussed
during the development of the 1986 budget and as a result of City
Council deliberations, was partially funded. The number of items
listed by Custom Fire Apparatus in their proposal was quite lengthy
and it was decided during budget preparation that additional infor-
mation and clarification was needed if all the improvements to
the pumper truck were to be further considered. The City
Administrator and Fire Chief Childers have met and discussed,
in detail, the proposal. A copy of a memorandum describing the
equipment repairs and the original proposal from Custom Fire
Apparatus, Inc. are enclosed on pages_ through -
for review. Fire Chief Childers will be present to answer qu s� tions
and further discuss this item at the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS
approval or modification fo the
of the 1971 C-900 Ford pumper truck.
ITEM: To approve or deny the
proposal for the refurbishing
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILI-1EMBP:RS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: REFURBISH 1971 C-900 FORD FIRE PUMPER
A budget request was submitted by the Fire Department last fall in
the amount of $39,000 to refurbish the 1971 C-900 Ford pumper. The
original request included $25,500 for the pumper, $4,500 for the
aerial and approximately $4,000 for grass rig #7. The remaining
amount was budgeted for unscheduled repair. The Fire Department
was able to complete the refurbishing of the aerial trunk during
1985 and is willing to reschedule to a later date the refurbishing
of grass rig #7. Since the City Council budgeted $12,000 for the
refurbishing of equipment, an additional $14,550 would be needed
if this pumper truck is to be completely refurbished in 1986.
The City Administrator has met with Fire Chief Childers and
reviewed in detail the modifications and refurbishing for this
piece of equipment. As you recall, Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc.,
has provided a specific description of modifications that would
occur to the pumper truck. Attached is a copy of the description
that was distributed as a part of the draft budget late last
sum.-ner/early fall. Direction was given by the City Council to
review in greater detail the general description and further
determine whether all of the modifications as suggested by Custom
Fire Apparatus, Inc., need to occur at this time. Iwill attempt
to provide some additional information using the sub -categories
outlined in the description by Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc.
CHASSIS CAB
® The description that was offered for the chassis cab is
self-explanatory and there is no additional description
offered by the Fire Chief and City Administrator.
FIRE PUMP COMPARTMENT
Apparently there is considerable rust building up' on the
compartment and once the compartment is cleaned it will be
easier to use and maintain. The Fire Department is experi-
encing problems with gauges freezing which could be critical
at a fire. The Department is ,attempting to make the pumper
more compatible with large diameter hose and relay operations
since the tanker truck is no longer used for fire suppression.
CREW COMPARTMENT
Again, rehabilitation is desired for the purpose of reducing
future maintenance. Some rust is occurring and by cleaning
7—
MEMO: MAYOR & COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 14, 1986
PAGE TWO
up this area of the equipment, rust will be prevented in the
future, expanding the longevity of the equipment. Apparently,
the crew cab is in direct violation of OSHA standards and by
making the various modifications suggested in the letter of
description, noise will be reduced and meet the OSHA standards.
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING
The doors are starting to sag and the refinishing will reduce
maintenance and allow the doors to work properly. According
to Fire Chief Childers, there is a safety factor involved
with this item.
Apparently the present tank has been repaired numerous times
and is still leaking water. By replacing the 500 gallon
capacity water tank and adding a new 750 booster tank, the
Fire Department will increase their storage capacity and be
assured of storage once the pumper is called out to a fire.
On page 4, the relocation of the galvanized pipe is designed
to prevent freezing. Apparently, the Fire Department has had
problems with this equipment freezing; again, a critical
problem at the time of fire suppression needs. Another
modification on page 4 relates to changes necessary to accom-
modate the larger diameter hose. There are electrical prob-
lems that have been experienced with this pumper truck;
therefore, changes are desired as a part of the refurbishing.
The Department is concerned that this truck may not meet ISO
standards and, therefore, many of the modifications are needed
for satisfaction of that requirement. In recent years, the
Fire Department has spent approximately $5,000 for pump re-
pairs and feel the pump should be in good shape after the few
repairs that are identified on page 5 are completed.
The 1971 C-900 Ford pumper is currently located at Station $3. The
proposed refurbishing cost, assuming all the repairs are made,
would amount to approximately $26,000-$26,500. The City has
budgeted $12,000 in 1986 for these repairs. Fire Chief Childers
has stated that if the repairs are made, the equipment should last
the City approximately another ten (10) years. A new pumper truck
designed to meet these specifications would cost the City approxi-
mately $150,000 with delivery in excess of 12 months.
At the time the budget was considered and adopted, the City Admin-
istrator was directed to contact Fire Chief Childers for additional
3
MEMO: MAYOR & COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 14, 1985
PAGE THREE a -
information and explanation regarding the request to refurbish
this piece of equipment. Due to Fire Chief• Childers' 10 -week
training in Seattle, Washington, this matter was deferred for
consideration until January.
Fire Chief Childers is expected to be at the meeting on Tuesday to
answer any questions and will be asking for consideration by the
Council to amend the budget and allow the modifications and
refurbishing to occur for the 1971 pumper truck.
® City Administratoll
CC. Fire Chief Childers
TLH/kf
•
TT tl;i 4 ,
Airport Road a P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715)294-2555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
The following modifications and refurbishing to be completed on your C-900
Ford/General Fire Department Pumpers.
CHASSIS CAB:
The Ford chassis cab is to be stripped of all chrome and electrical fixtures/
accessories including rear view mirrors, spotlights, emergency lights, grille,
bumper, and front cab fenders, left and right sides. The entire chassis cab
exterior is to be power sanded and hand sanded to a smooth finish, removing
all scratches and chips in the original paint coatings. The surface rust
damaged areas are to be sanded to bare metal, properly prepared with rust
preventative and properly primed. Fender attachment areas, left and right
sides, to be repaired with all -rust damaged areas being cut out and new
metal fabrications being welded in position and properly filled.
(Engine No. 6/1971 Pumper) The right front cab door, upper rear corner, to
be repaired to properly fit door opening. Mirror mounting area to be
straightened prior to refinishing.
The entire exterior of the chassis cab is to be painted with nonsanding zinc
chromate primer and sprayed with two full coats of acrylic enamel with urethane
hardeners and gloss additives. After final painting, all chrome trim and
electrical fixtures shall be reinstalled, using new fasteners where necessary.
Cab entrance step areas to be trimmed with polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate
material. All chrome and electrical fixtures to be properly cleaned and
polished prior to reinstallation.
FIRE PUMP COMPARTMENT:
The left side fire pump operator's panel is to be completely disassembled,
removing all gauges, controls'and nametags.Original pump panel area to be
overlaid with brushed stainless steel, equipped with new brushed stainless
steel full width integral light housing. A full width, brushed stainless
steel tilt -out style pump gauge panel to be fabricated and installed complete
with polished stainless steel hinge and double adjustable grip latches.
Original pump pressure and pump compound gauges and individual discharge
pressure gauges to be removed and exchanged for two new 4-1/2 inch diameter
pump pressure and compound gauges, and six new 3-1/2 inch diameter individual
discharge pressure gauges. All gauges to be Span Sub -Z II, liquid -filled,
freeze -proof type, properly identified with permanent metal nametags below
each gauge.
Brushed stainless steel panel overlay to be properly drilled and fitted
prior to final painting and reinstalled after final painting. Sides of
stainlesy steel to be trimmed with polished aluminum extrusions.
A new, 3-1/2 inch i.d. large diameter remote-controlled discharge valve
to be furnished, located inside heated pump compartment with discharge outlet
located on right side apparatus body. Discharge to be equipped with 4=inch'
Storz adapter with 4 -inch Storz x 2-1/2 inch NST reducing adapter with NST
cap and chain.
•
•
Pale 1. a
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS.INC.
Airport Road O P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 a (715)294.2555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: `Eagan Fire Department
CREW COMPARTMENT:
The body -mounted crew cab to be entirely stripped of all original paint
coatings and trim accessories, interior and exterior. Crew cab doors
to be removed. Entire interior of crew cab to be disassembled with all
seating removed and floor sections disassembled and discarded. Crew cab
doors to be disassembled. Crew cab interior and exterior to be stripped of
original paint Coatings (chemically or sandblasting) and prepared for new
refinishing.
The interior of the crew cab floor, upper and lower levels, is to be fitted
with new polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate fabrications, bolted in position
and removable.
• The interior crew cab seating areas are to be recovered with black naugahyde,
including new foam cushions.
The interior crew cab rear window is to be removed and discarded. The original
rear window opening to be enlarged and equipped with a new sliding rear window
.unit.
The interior and exterior of the crew cab area is to be properly prepared and
repainted, same as specified for above chassis cab.
Interior crew cab doors and interior of crew cab to be lined with Antiphon 13
sound dampening pad and overlaid with 1 -inch thick naugahyde covered foam
sound insulation material. Material to be applied with adhesive and aluminum
fabrications in all corners.
After final painting, new aluminum crew cab floor sections to be reinstalled
with neoprene rubber liners between all aluminum and steel mounting areas.
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING:
The entire apparatus body shall be stripped of all accessories including:
compartment doors, hinges, door latches, handrails and brackets, lighting
fixtures, drip mouldings, wiring, pump control rods, pump pressure gauges,
pump nametags, compartment floors, compartment shelves, and all runningboards
and steps.
The original compartment door hinges are to be removed. New polished stainless
steel piano -type hinges to be furnished and installed on all compartment doors
and crew cab doors prior to final assembly and refinishing of apparatus body.
New stainless hinges to be polished for chrome -like finish, bolted to doors
and body using hardened button socket headcap screw fasteners'. Doors to be
properly.fit with new hinges and removedjor body finishing.
OPTION: Remove and discard original small -diameter chrome plated D -handle
double point latch assemblies; furnish and install new large diameter D -handle
chrome latch assemblies, complete with bent rings and neoprene rubber door
skin gaskets. Please add: $300.00.
�P
Page 2.
CUSTOM ' FIRE APPARATU& INC.
Airport Road • P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715)2942555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING: Cont'd.
OPTION: Furnish and install new painted galvanized steel fabricated adjustable
compartment shelves, complete with polished stainless steel track assemblies.
Shelves to be located in all full height compartments. Please add: $250.00.
OPTION: Furnish and install new 5 -inch diameter chrome plated interior 12 -volt
light fixtures in compartment tops and under all shelving areas. Please
add: $200.00.
Original rear mounted booster hose reel with hose and nozzle to be removed
and exchanged for above specified body modifications.
Entire apparatus body, exterior and compartment interiors, to be sandblasted
to a new white metal finish and properly prepared for refinishing.
Fabricate and install new polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate runningboards
and compartment floors and rear step platform area. Runningboards to be
fabricated of .125 -inch polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate material, designed
to replace original steel runningboards. Runningboards to be installed,
removed, and re -installed after final finish painting.
Rear apparatus body compartmentation to be,removed and discarded. New full
width rear compartment to be fabricated with rear body paneling constructed
of polished 4 -way aluminum treadplate material. A new, full -width roll -up
style "shutter door" to be furnished. Door to be minimum 60 -inches wide,
30 -inches high, to provide unobstructed compartment opening.
Remove original 500 gallon capacity water tank and discard.'
A new 750 gallon capacity booster tank to be fabricated and furnished.
Tank is to be constructed of pickled and oiled heavy plate steel with "stress- •
relieved" construction, rectangular T-shaped, complete with forward filler stack
and interior vent. Tank interior to be sandblasted and spray coated with
Super Tank Solution. The tank is to be of the wirefeed welded construction
inside and out, provided with interior baffles per NFPA Requirements. Tank to
be equipped with removable top section with hold down 'bolts not exposed to water.
Tank to be designed to replace original water tank, installed with proper
regard to weight distribution and easily removable from the body. Tank bottom
to be fabricated of quarter -inch steel plate. Ends to be fabricated of 3/16 -inch
steel plate. Sides and top to be fabricated of 10 -gauger Tank to be equipped
with eight individual removable magensium annodes, one per baffled compartment.
Original tank level gauge and discharge and suction connections to be removed
and discarded. New, 3 -inch i.d. tank suction sump area to be furnished, complete
with removable clean-out plug. Water tank exterior to be vinyl wash primed,
zinc chromate primed, enamel painted and.rust-proofed prior to installation
in the apparatus body.
A new, 3 -inch i.d. Elkhart brass ball valve to be furnished, located between
tank and pump suction inlet. Valve to be installed with flexible connection
designed with no elbow between tank and pump. Tank suction valve to allow for
550 gallon per minute flow from tank -to -pump.
pnre 3.
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS.I G.
Airport Road O P.O. Box°577 O Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715)294-2555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING: Cont'd.
Two 3 -inch i.d. galvanized pipe discharges to run through tank interior
with outlets located at regi of apparatus body above rear compartment door.
Outlets to be located per Customer's requirements, piped to original rear
discharge valves.
Two 1-1/2 inch'i.d. galvanized pipe discharges to be furnished through
tank interior with outlets located at rear of apparatus body, above rear
compartment door. Two new 1-1/2 inch locking style brass ball gated discharges
to be furnished, piped to above specified rear 1-1/2 inch outlets. Valves
to be Operator's panel controlled, located inside heated pump compartment,
equipped with individual 3-1/2 inch diameter pressure gauges.
• Original hosebed mounted ladder compartment to be disassembled and discarded.
Three new galvanized steel triple -formed adjustable hosebed dividers to be
fabricated and installed in main hosebed area. Dividers to be equipped with
vertical wood liners to prevent snagging of hose, fully adjustable per
Customer's requirements.
OPTION: All vertically hinged compartment doors to be modified to include
installation of stainless steel rod/spring-style door holder assemblies.
Door holders to be designed to hold compartment doors in the "Open" and
"Closed" positions. Door holder assemblies to be bolted in position and
removable, designed to replace original chain -style door stops. Please
add: $400.00.
After proper sandblasting, body exterior and interior of all compartments shall
be power sanded for smooth finish. All rusted areas to be sandblasted and
® properly caulked prior to refinishing. Rust damaged areas to be cut out with
new metal fabrications welded into position.
The entire apparatus body and crew cab areas, after proper paint removal, shall
be machine sanded, vinyl wash primed, zinc chromate primed, and sprayd with two
full coats of acrylic enamel with urethane hardeners and gloss additives.
After above specified painting, the entire apparatus body is to be re -assembled, .
using all new zinc plated hardened fasteners. All compartment doors to be
reinstalled with polished stainless steel piano hinges bolted in place with
hardened zinc plated fasteners. New compartment door weatherstripping to be
provided on all compartments and crew cab areas.
All chrome and electrical fixtures shall be properly cleaned and re -installed
on apparatus body using new fasteners. Any damaged wiring and light fixtures
shall be.replaced with equipment and pricing to be approved by the Fire Chief.
The entire apparatus body and crew cab areas to be rewired with new master loom
extending from chassis cab to rear of apparatus body. New 10 -wire junction block
shall be furnished and located inside rearcompartment. All wiring shall terminate
at the 10 -wire junction block and extend to individual light fixtures throughout
Page 4.
CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS.INC.
Airport Road • P.O. Box 577 • Osceola, Wisconsin 54020 • (715) 2942555
MODIFICATIONS AND REFURBISHING FOR: Eagan Fire Department
APPARATUS BODY MODIFICATIONS/REFINISHING: Cont'd.
the body compartmentation. All compartment light fixtures shall be rewired
and new bulb elements to be furnished.
After completed modifications and refurbishing per the above specifications,
the chassis cab doors shall be relettered with hand -painted gold leaf with
black shading. -The apparatus body is to be striped with gold stripe and black
trim lines. Full length, 2 -inch wide ScotchLite Safety Stripe shall be
provided, running full length of apparatus body, left and right sides.
The entire fire pump system shall be recertified in accordance with new NFPA
test standards. Certification to include pump pressure test, pump vacuum test,
recalibration of pressure gauges, adjusting pump packing, change pump gear lube,
lubricate pump system, and a 2 -hour recertification test with proper recordings •
and recertification forms.
Total cost for the above rebuilding/refinishing and modifications: $25,640.00
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
2. Fire Chief Childers is suggesting that .the City request an
ISO inspection for purposes of lowering the insurance rating that
is currently at 6.. The City has not received an ISO inspection
for several years and it is the feeling of both the Fire Chief
and City Administrator that due to excessive water main installa-
tion, hydrants and storage capacity during the past several years,
the addition of Fire Station #3 and additional fire suppression
equipment that Eagan could, more then likely, qualify for a lower
rating. The city of Bloomington has recently concluded an ISO
inspection and their rating is now a 3. A change in the fire
rating would have a favorable- impact on the insurance rates for
commercial and industrial property located throughout the City.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To direct the City
Administrator to seek an ISO inspection for the purpose of lowering
commercial/industrial insurance rates throughout the community.
B. POLICE DEPARTMENT
There are no items to be discussed under Police Department at
this time.
C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. Attached on pages through _/-- for your review
and direction to the Parks and Recreation Commission is a memo
outlining concerns related to the continued use of snowmobiles
in the City of Eagan. Concerns raised by the Commission pertain
directly to the snowmobiles in City parks. There is no official
action required on this item, however, any direction to the Parks
and Recreation Commission would be helpful.
/D
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY
FROM: KEN VRAA,.DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: JANUARY 24, 1986
RE: ADVISORY PAM & RECREATION COMMISSION
SNOWMOBILE USE CONCERNS
ISSUE
The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission is seeking direction from the City
Council concerning continued use of snowmobiles within the City.
BACKGROUND
At the January meeting of the Advisory Commission, the Commission discussed
problems that were being encountered with the use of snowmobiles in the City,
and particularly, in City parks.
In the course of discussion of the issue, the Commission identified several
subfactors influencing their thinking regarding snowmobiling.
1) An apparent increase in the number of complaints and observable problems
from previous years and an increasing number of conflicts in use between
snowmobilers and vehicles - snowmobilers and pedestrians.
I
2) The Eagan Snowmobile Club's declining interest in the continuation of the
Highline Trail and Johnny Cake IRidge trails apparently because of
increasing traffic on residential and collector streets, as well as the
completion of I -35E. (Maynard Ohm has so indicated this.)
3) Lack of volunteer enforcement of the Eagan ordinance from the snowmobile
• club and the inability of the police to patrol all areas.
4) Early snowfalls provided ideal snowmobiling conditions, thus increasing
the amount of snowmobile traffic.
5) Increasing vehicle traffic on City streets causes additional conflict and
liability.
After reviewing the information available, the Commission determined that
before it makes recommendations or takes any action concerning the use of
snowmobiles within the City, and in particular City parks, they wish direction
from the City Council and if members of the Council had received complaints or
observed the same problems.
It is suggested that if continuation of snowmobiles along the Highline and
Johnny Cake Ridge Road, as well as residential streets, is of greater
detriment than value, perhapa then snowmobiles should be discontinued. It was
also suggested that the Commission hold an informational meeting to determine
interest in continuation of snowmobiles in the City or if there is adverse
reaction by the public to their continued use. The informational
meeting/public hearing would then be able to help shape public policy
regarding the continued use/disuse in the City if the Council felt such a need
existed.
FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
Provide the A.P.R.C. with direction regarding the issue of snowmobiles within
the City.
Respectfully Submitted On Behalf Of The Advisory Parks & Recreation
Comm on,
VIII �
Recreation
KV/js
v
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Three
2. The Parks and Recreation Commission had planned to review
the Parks Dedication Ordinance at their last regular meeting.
Due to the number of agenda items and length of the meeting it
was not possible to review the Parks D=_dication ordinance however,
it is on their agenda for the March 6, 1986 meeting. The Director
of Parks and Recreation would like any thoughts or direction the
City Council might have regarding various suggestions that are
discussed in the attached memorandum found on pages I5 through
Ken has raised several issues in his report to the
PAS and Recreation Commission and is suggesting that consideration
be given to a change in the—current policy and. further that the
City Code's chapter on subdivisions -be-,amended to adopt the park
systems plan by reference. The park systems plan would include
park land dedication requirements. There is no official action
required on this item, however,direction to the Parks and Recreation
Director and Commission is being requested.
/3
ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 4, 1986
BE: PARKS DEDICATION ORDINANCE REVIEW
At the time of the annual review of the parks dedication requirements, the
Advisory Commission requested staff to .prepare a report which would address
several areas of concern expressed by the Commission.
Subsequently, a memorandum was addressed to the Commission indicating that
other communities were also reviewing their parks dedication ordinance for
possible revision; that the directors from these communities were to meet,
• discuss, and perhaps work together in a review process.
The Directors of Parks & Recreation from the communities of Maple Grove,
Plymouth, Eden Prairie, Lakeville and Eagan, as well the Economics Director
from the City of Blaine, met for nearly a full day to critically evaluate each
ordinance and the relationship it has with existing state law and judicial
findings. It is not the intent of this memorandum to review all that was
discussed at this meeting. It is important to note that from this observer's
standpoint there can be no single ordinance which could be easily adopted by
each community. Significant differences in each community, philosophical and
the current status of their respective park systems, make such a document
improbable to develop. However, this meeting did produce some significant
discussion which should help this community to improve its parks dedication
ordinance.
MEETING OBSERVATIONS
• It is this writer's opinion that Eagan's parks dedication ordinance, at least
philosophically, is one of the strongest and fairest to developers. In
comparison, it was noted that 1) Eagan is the only community that provides
for partial parkland dedication credit for areas which are below the 100 year
flood mark, 2) provides park dedication credit for areas which are part of
utility easements. 3) The City's commercial/industrial park dedication
requirement provides for credit where there are significant on-site provisions
for parks and open space.
It still appears that Eagan's parks dedication ordinance could, and indeed
should be strengthened to better comply with State statutes. For example, the
Eagan dedication ordinance should ,1) strengthen the relationship between the
amount of dedication (land or cash) and the impact of the subdivision's
platting and its relationship to parkland needs. 2) The existing land
dedication provides for a constant percentage - 10% - regardless of density.
This can be construed as "inequitable" and therefore, should be reviewed for
modifications.
It must be recognized that it is not the intent of the strengthening of this i
ordinance to mean to increase parks dedication. Rather, strengthen means to
better show the relationship between the platting review, the need for parks,
its reasonableness in order to comply with the State statutes and thus, make
it less susceptible to court challenge.
STATE STATUTE
Attached is the State statute which initially allowed for cities to develop
and implement parks dedication ordinances. In providing for these
regulations, it should be noted that there are several key words and phrases
which are significantly important. The first of these is that "a reasonable
portion of any proposed subdivision be dedicated." The second is that
dedication, at least for cash, should be "based on the fair market value of
the land no later than at the time of the final approval." Third, "a
municipality reasonably determines that it will need to acquire that portion
of land for the purposes stated."
1
In essence, these are the three—critical issues that a parks dedication
ordinance should address. --
Perhaps one of the most significant court cases relating to parks dedication
is Koolis vs. the City of Bloomington in which the State Supreme Court upheld
Bloomington and that its 10% land dedication was a reasonable portion.
Consequently, many communities have adopted the 10% standard. A word of
caution in adopting this 10% standard. Municipalities still must be able to
demonstrate that this is reasonable and that it will need to acquire this
percentage and a particular parcel for parks purposes to satisfy the residents
needs. Because of Eagan's Park Systems Plan which contains a significant
amount of information regarding the demographics of the community (as well as
projected future growth and development), individual park standards, ratios of
facilities, a neighborhood park standard, the type/quality of property the
City seeks to acquire for parks purposes and has defined parks service areas,
as well as pencil locations for parks, the City is in an
excellent position to support its case for parks dedication as reasonable. It
would seem prudent, however to incorporate and/or at least identify the Park
Systems Plan and its continuing updating as the basis for the City of Eagan's
parks dedication ordinance. Further, because the City has established its
standards for parks based on population, it would then seem appropriate to
establish its land dedication (and cash) based on population - i.e. density of
a development.
A constant land dedication of 10% for single family as well as for multiple
family development of high living unit density per acre is, in fact,
inequitable and may be a case for unreasonableness.
It would be prudent for the City to have a land dedication requirement that is
based on a sliding scale which increases with unit density and has a basis, in
fact, for providing parks in relationship to demand/impact.
BASED UPON FAIR MARKET VALUE
State statutes indicate that the municipality must base its dedication on
"fair market value." A review of other cases indicates that it appears
acceptable and reasonable for a municipality to establish market value
collectively, rather than for a single parcel being considered for
subdivision. It also appears acceptable to set the value at the time of the
final subdivision plat rather than raw land value. In summation, it appears
215
•
•
that the City of Eagan's history of setting values for parks cash dedication
that is based on recent land sales is an appropriate methodology. Therefore,
staff would recommend that this procedure continue, but that the ordinance
indicate the methodology used.
DETERMINATION OF LAND TO Bi•DEDICATED OR FEES TO BE PAID
Through the City's Comprehensive Park Systems Plan and its analysis of
facility needs for residents, the City has generally determined that a
standard of 15 acres of neighborhood and community parks and open space per
population of 1,000 persons is an applicable and valid standard. Approximately
twelve acres of this 15 acre amount shall constitute neighborhood parks and
shall be the minimum standard established by the City.
Therefore, the City shall require dedication, either land or cash, of
sufficient amount which shall meet the standard for neighborhood parks.
Dedication shall be based on density "of residents in the following residential
unit types (1985 census date): 1
• Single family - 3.5
Duplex - 2.8
Townhouse & Quads - 2.1
Multiple - - 1.9
LAND DEDICATION
In brief, the City should relate the parks dedication on a more equitable
basis based on number of residents per type of unit, utilizing the City's
standard for park acreage.
Based on the number of persons per residential unit as previously described,
land dedication shall be as follows:
Alternate I
0-1.9 units per acre - 8%
® 2-3.5 units''p'er acre - 10%
3.6-6 units per acre - 12%
6-10 units per acre - 14%
10 + units per acre - Add .5%
(Alternate II)
This alternative would be a calculated dedication utilizing the type of unit
times the number of residents for that unit. This would equal "demand for
parks." This to be multipled by the parkland equivalent per individual .012
to determine the exact amount of land dedication.
EXAMPLE: Developer X intends to develop 40 acres - twenty acres for single
family and 20 acres for apartment. The single family development
will have 3.5 units per acre and the apartment has 11 units an acre
or 70 single family homes and 220 apartments.
70 units X 3.5 people = 245 people x .012 (standard area per person)
= 2.94 acres ., I , .
220 units x 1.9 people = 418 people x .012 (standard area pi
person) = 5.01 acres
TOTAL: 7.95 ACRES
Therefore, the dedication is .012 acre per person.
CASH DEDICATION
It shall be the City's intent to provide for, where land is not a requirement,
a cash dedication fee. This cash dedication shall be based on composite value
of properties within each of the zoning classifications. This value shall be
determined annually by the City upon recommendation of the Advisory Parks &
Recreation Commission. The land value is to be divided by the number of units
per acre to determine the cash fee which shall equal an equivalency of 12
acres per thousand population times the composite fee of properties of similar
zoning values. This formula shall be as follows:
RESIDENTS) UNITS PER
HOUSING TYPE PER UNIT LAND VALUE 100 POPULATION
Single family
3.5
$11,000
= 28 =
Duplex
2.8
13,000
= 35 =
Townhouse/Quads
2.1
15,000
= 47 =
Multiple/Apts
1.9
17,000
= 52 =
REQUIRED CASH EQ.
(ACREAGE X LAND VALUE)
$13,200
$15,600
$18,000
$20,400
ALTERNATE II:
CASH (CASH EQ. UNITS)
$1 = $471.00 single family
28
$15,600 = $445.00 duplex
35
$18,000 = $382.00 townhouse/quad.
47
$207400 = $392.00 apts.
52
Similar to the alternate being provided in the land dedication, this would be
a cash equivalent per person.
EXAMPLE: 20 single family homes x 3.5 people x .012 acres x $11,000 (values
of property per acre) = .84 x $11,000 = $924.00
DISCUSSION
Alternate II in the proposed land dedication holds constant the value of
property to be dedicated with each plat. Based on 12 acres per thousand
residents, this is the equivalent of .012 acres per person. Upholding this
value constant for each individual, it is quite easy to calculate land
dedication. One will only need to take the type of living unit being proposed
times residents per unit times the .012 factor to determine the acreage to be
dedicated. On the surface, this constant value of land per person seems most
equitable. The fallacy with this formula, however is that it does not take
into recognition that single family dwellings are likely to have more children
�7
4
E
Ll
who are generally more consumptive of parks. Consequently, it would seem that
constant value of parkland person is biased against the multiple (or for
single family) by requiring the same amount of land for adults as for children
from single family homes.
Alternate I under "Land Dedication" takes into consideration, at least to some
degree, that single family residents are generally more consumptive of parks
than multiple family residents. Consequently, even though there is an
escalating percentage of land dedication based on the units per acre, this
percentage is still less than the straight .012 acres per person.
The increasing land dedication percentage seems much more fair than the
straight 10% land dedication regardless of units per acre.
CASH DEDICATION
The cash dedication calculation is ver. similar to that which is being used
currently other than the fact that it h s been updated based on residents per
• unit. For example, under the existing barks dedication policy, single family
is currently allocated for residents per unit and consequently, 25 units per
100 population. This has now been changed to 3.5 residents per unit and 28
units per 100 population. The other value change has been that the City is
using 12 acres per 1,000 population as its standard. Utilizing this new
standard of 1.2 acres per 100 population times the land value of $11,000 per
acre, the required cash equivalent is $13,200. This figure, when divided by
the 28 units per 100 population, equals the cash equivalency of $471.00 per
unit.
The proposed cash dedication takes into consideration that land values
escalate with each type of housing unit. Currently, multiple family units are
paying their cash dedication based on land values for single family versus
land values for multiple. Under the current plan, there may be inequities
between similar developers where one is providing a land dedication from a
multiple dwelling area versus a cash dedication. Obviously, the cash
dedication is significantly less expensive for a developer to provide than the
• land dedication, particularly since that cash dedication is now currently
calculated on single family land values while the land dedication is obviously
of higher value.
It is improbable that an ordinance containing land and cash dedications is
going to be completely equitable and without flaw. However, any
recalculations, computations and variations should attempt to continue to be
fair and equitable as is possible both to the City and developer as well as
between developers.
Under Alternate I for cash dedication, the table shows the result of
escalating land values based on units per acre. You will note that in the
multiple apartment dwellings using land values of $17,000 per acre, the cash
equivalant would be $392.00. This would be an increase of $92.00 from the
1986 adjusted fee of $300.00. However, noting that the parks dedication
requirement could provide credit for on-site amenities provided by apartment
developers, this fee could be reduced for on-site amenities. Those developers
that provide tennis courts, swimming pools or other amenities with their
apartment units could be credited up to the 25% reduction in the cash
dedication. This would reduce the $392.00 dedication to $294.00 per unit.
Those apartment developers who fail to provide any amenities on-site, thereby
probably increasing the demand for park usage by apartment dwellers beyond the
norm, would be paying the full $392.00 per unit. Essentially this provides
greater flexibility for the City by providing credit against a cash dedication
and is closer to the value of the property upon which they are developing. 1`
Industrial/commercial dedication requirements shall remain as is. It appears
that this dedication requirement and verbage should be sufficient to cover any
contingencies associated with this dedication. However, this portion of the
ordinance should contain and provide for updating of the cost per acre by
resolution. This would allow the City to continue as it has in the past, but
would formally recognize the process.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
In reviewing what other communities have done with their parks dedication
requirements, it is interesting to note that for example, Blaine has included
the cost for development of park facilities as part of their park dedication
fees and included it in their calculation. The cities of Eden Prairie and
Plymouth are doing likewise. State tatutes do not address the cost for
development of facilities, although it seems clear that the intent of the
state statute was to not require existing properties to pay more as a result •
of increased development. Therefore, a reasonable portion of development
construction could be construed as being part of a parks dedication
requirement.
Most communities do not provide for credit for parkland within easements or if
part of a flood plain. Eagan's ordinance provides for this. It is this
writer's opinion that because the City has a significant number of ponding
areas utilized for storm water basins and because the City requires these for
storm ponding easements from the developer, it appears that where parkland is
also taken, partial credit should be given. Again this is an issue for
discussion and review, but to do otherwise as a double taking of property.
Several communities have "a savings clause" within their ordinance. The
savings clause is simply a requirement that where the City has indicated a
future park and the developer provides required parkland dedication and the
park space needed is greater that the developer is required to set aside, the •
additional property be set aside for up to one year in order to allow the City
to purchase this additional land. The savings clause establishes a procedure
and price for the property and is typically tied to the City's current fair
market valuation for single family zoned property. This writer would strongly
recommend that such provision be included within the parks dedication or
zoning ordinance.
FOR COMMISSION ACTION:
To review the staff report regarding park dedication, to accept or refuse, to
recommend/not recommend it being sent to the City Council.
Respectfully s bmi ed,
Director of Parks & Recreation
KV/js
N
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page :our
E. CABLE COMMISSION
Burnsville/Eagan Cable Administrator -Mr. Ralph Campbell will be
present to answer any questions the City Council might have regard-
ing Cable operations. The Cable Commission is spending a great.
deal of time analyzing all facets of the proposed Group W sale
and as additional information is available it will be shared with
the City Council.
V0
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Five
Memo
City Council Meeting
There are twelve (12) items
Items requiring one (1) motion
Council wishes to discuss any
those items should be removed
under Additional Items unless
on the agenda referred to as Consent
by the City Council. If the City
of the items in further detail,
from the Consent Agenda and placed
the discussion required is brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSE
A. Contractor License --Attached on page is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who have been Bele ted and retained
as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside
within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from
other municipalities or their client permit applications are
awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
contractor licenses as presented.
ai
To approve the list of
•
11
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
FEBRUARY 18, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
1. M.A. MORTENSON CO
2. PIETSCH CONSTRUCTION CO
3. DOUG SPEEDLING BUILDERS
4. SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION CO
5. WESLEY CONSTRUCTION, INC
®
1.
AMY & JACK HARDIN/TOM LOGELIN
BEATING/VENTILATING
1.
MERIT HVAC INC
2.
METRO AIR
3.
NORTHWESTERN SERVICE INC ;-
4.
S & L HEATING CO
5.
SWANSON PLBG & HTG INC
PLUMBING
1.
AAA COOP PLBG & HTG
®
2.
MURR PLUMBING - APPLE VALLEY
3.
BRUCE NELSON PLBG & HTG
4. NYBO-PETERSON PLUMBING
5. VALLEY PLUMBING CO
WATER SOFTENER
1. MINNESOTA WATER TREATMENT INC
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Six
Memo
City Council Meeting
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
There are four (4) personnel items to be.. given consideration:
1. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Official action at the February 4, 1986
City Council meeting, Nancy Graves was appointed to fill a four
hour clerk typist vacancy in the Typing Pool. The City has been
contacted by Ms. Graves, she has indicated that she has decided
to accept another job offer, rather then that from the City.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
To acknowledge
the notifica-
tion by
Nancy Graves that she would
not be accepting
the position
of Clerk
Typist with the City.
2. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Interviews and testing were conducted
by Administrative Secretary Finnegan and Administrative Assistant
Duffy in order, to fill the vacant 6 hour position in the Typing
Pool for Administration. It is their recommendation that Helga
Brock be appointed to fill this vacancy. The effective starting
date for Ms. Brock would be February 10, 1986. Ms. Brock has already
successfully completed the City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Helga Brock as part-time Clerk Typist (6 hours) for the Typing
Pool in Administration, the appointment to be effective February
10, 1986.
3. Chief Mechanic/Shop Supervisor-- After screening the approxi-
mately 75 applications for this position, six finalists were tested
and interviewed by Director of Public Works -Colbert and Superinten-
dent of Streets and Equipment Erhart on Friday, January 31. It
is their recommendation that Thomas Streefland be appointed to
fill this newly created position. The appointment would be effec-
tive March 10, 1986. Mr. Streefland has already successfully
completed the City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Thomas Streefland as Chief Mechanic/Shop Supervisor, the appoint-
ment to be effective March 10, 1986.
4. Clerk Typist -Parks and Recreation/Protective Inspections--
After screening the approximately 35 applications for this posi-
tion, six applicants were tested and interviewed by Director of
Parks and Recreation Vraa, Park Planner Sullivan and Administrative
Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Mary Weathers
-::7,3
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
be appointed to fill this position. The appointment would be
contingent upon successful completion of the City"s physical
examination requirement and would be effective February 24, 1986.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Mary Weathers as Clerk Typist for the Parks and Recreation/Pro-
tective Inspections Departments', the appointment to be effective
February 24, 1986, and contingent upon successful completion of
the City's physical examination requirement.
E
a,�z
•
0
Agenda Information
February 18, 1985,
Page Eight
Memo
City Council Meeting
CORRECTION OF CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
C. Correction of March 5, 1985, City Council Minutes --In reviewing
the March 5, 1985, City Council minutes it was realized that the
contract number is in error for Consent Agenda item number 7,
describing the Well Site #5 contract final payment. The contract
referred to in that agenda item should be 83-18 and not 84-18.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Correct the March 5, 1985,.
City Council minutes by "changing consent item number 7 to read
Contract 83-18 instead of 84-18.
a�
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Maeting
Page Nine
CONTRACT 84-13
FINAL PAYMENT ACCEPTANCE
D. Contract 84-13, Final Payment/Acceptance, Water Booster
Station --We have received a request for final payment from our
consulting engineering firm along with a certification that the
project has been completed in compliance with city approved plans
and specifications. All final inspections have been performed
by representatives of the Public Works Department resulting in
their favorable recommendation. This water booster station was
constructed at the intersection of Lexington and Diffley Roads
and helps to provide an alternate _source of water to our high
• pressure system.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 10th and
final payment for Contract 84-13 (water booster station) in the
amount of $9,060.12 to A a K Construction Incorporated and to
accept this facility for perpetual maintenance.
PROJECT 42.7, RESOLUTION RESTRICTING PARKING
E. Project 427, _Resolution Restricting Parking (Yankee Doodle
Road, T.H. 13 to Federal Drive)-- Due to the fact that the proposed
reconstruction of this segment of Yankee Doodle Road qualifies
for Municipal State Aid Funding, it is necessary for the City
to pass a formal resolution prohibiting on street parking along
this segment. Enclosed on pagey is a resolution that
must be approved by Council before State Aid will approve the
final design plans which is necessary to obtain their funding
assistance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution
prohibiting on -street parking on Yankee Doodle Road for the Project
427 reconstruction and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute all related documents..
M
RESOLUTION
Relating to Parking Restrictions On
S.A.P. 195-120-01 from Trunk Highway No. 13
to Federal Drive
in the City of Eagan Minnesota.
THIS RESOLUTION, passed this day of
by the City of Eagan in Dakota
County, Minnesota
The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City",
® WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 120
Yankee Doodle Road from Trunk Highway No. 13
to Federal Drive
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for
parking on both sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a
Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain
parking restrictions, and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid
project in the "City", has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY.RESOLVED:
That the "City shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on
the north and south side of MSAS 120 (Yankee Doodle Road)
at all times.
Dated this day of , 19 .
-ATTEST: City of Eagan , Minnesota. ---,-
City
d7
BY
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
PROJECT 467, FEASIBILITY REPORT/PUBLIC HEARING
F. Project 467, Receive Feasibility Report/Authorize Public Hearing
(Wescott Road - Lexington to 1/2 Mile East) --In response to a
petition received from the developers of the proposed Greensboro
Addition (Gabbert Development) and the Lexington Square develop-
ment (Northland Mortgage Company), the Council authorized the
preparation of the feasibility report to upgrade that portion
of Wescott Road from Lexington Avenue to � mile east (power line
corridor). This feasibility report has now been completed and
is being presented to the Council for their consideration for
scheduling a public hearing to receive formal public input.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 467 (Wescott Road - Lexington to � mile east)
and schedule a public hearing to be held March 18, 1986.
CONTRACT 85-02, FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE, PEACEFUL HEIGHTS
G. Contract 85-02, Final Payment/Acceptance, Peaceful Heights
(Streets and Utilities): We have received a request for final
payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certi-
fication of compliance with City approved plans and specifications.
All final inspections have been performed by representatives of
the Public Works Department and is subsequently being recommended
for favorable consideration and perpetual maintenance.
. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 4th and
final payment for Contract 85-02 (Peaceful Heights Addition) in
the amount of $9,571.67 to Lake Area Utility Contracting Inc.
and to accept the project for perpetual maintenance.
CONTRACT 84-08, FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE
WESTBURY AND LEXINGTON SQUARE
H. Contract 84-08, Final Payment/Acceptance, Westbury & Lexington
Square (Streets & Utilities) --We have received a request for final
payment from our consulting engineering firm along with a certifi-
cation of compliance with City approved plans and specifications.
All final inspections have been performed by representatives of
the 'Public Works Department and it is recommended for favorable
consideration and perpetual maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 7th and
final payment for Contract 84-08 (Westbury and Lexington Square
Additions) in the amount of $32,578.21 to Lametti and Sons Inc.
and to accept the project for perpetual maintenance.
R
Agenda Information Memo
February 18,, 1986,.City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
CONTRACT 85-3/SLATERS ACRES - STREETS & UTILITIES
I. Contract 85-3, Change Orderr #1, Slaters Acres (Streets
& Utilities) --In response to requests received from various
property owners during the construction of streets and utilities
servicing the Slaters Acres subdivision, two changes were incor-
porated in the plans resulting in additional cost identified
as follows:
PART A.
In order to maintain maximum
future development of the
west of Storland Road (Jack
owner requested the sanitary
Acres to be constructed 4 feet
(Add $6,900)
PART B:
flexibility for the potential
unplatted property south and
Hilla property), that property
sewer extension from Slaters
lower than originally proposed.
Due to the excessive driveway slope to the existing houses
located at the south end of James Court, these property
owners requested a special driveway section to facilitate
their ability to get a running start up their driveway
in the winter time without incurring a bump at the curb
and gutter section in front of their driveway. Subsequently,
the existing curb and gutter section was removed and replaced
with a more accessible driveway approach apron. (Add $2,770.)
All costs associated with both parts of this change order will
be :assessed against the benefited properties as a part of this
contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change order
#1 to Contract 8'5-3 (Slaters Acres) in the amount of $9,670.21
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
Zq
•
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Twelve
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 85-7/EAGANDALE/LEMAY LAKE
J. Contract 85-07, Change Order #1, Eagandale/Lemay Lake (Streets
and Utilities)--Th-is contract provided for the installation
of streets and utilities to service the Eagandale/Lemay Lake
1st Addition apartment complex southwest of Lone Oak Road and
I -35E. During the construction of the utilities, it was necessary
to initiate additional work in response to concerns expressed
by adjacent property owners and at the request of the developer
as follows:
PART A:
Due to the construction of the required landscaped berm
along the west portion of this property adjacent to the
Poppler Addition, it is necessary to construct a storm sewer
catch -basin inlet to handle the drainage blocked by this berm
construction. Upon completion, the location of the catch
basin inlet was not satisfactory to Mr. Poppler and was
subsequently relocated per his request. (Add ,$1,679.40)
71e&i1e1F
Due to the fact that several of the utilities were located
within parking lot and private drive areas, the final adjust-
ment of the manhole and gate valve structures were assumed to
be performed privately by the developer as a part of their
parking lot and driveway construction. However, at the
specific request of the developer, the. City performed these
• final adjustments under the City Contract. (Add $1,605.85)
The costs associated with both portions of this change order will
be assessed against the Eagandale/Lemay Lake subdivision in accor•-
dance with the developer's request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change. order #1
to Contract 815-7 (Eagandale/Lemay Lake Addition) in the amount of
$3,285.25 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
related documents.
'a
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
PROJECT 470/GREENSBORO ADDITION
K. Project 470, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report
Greensboro Addition) --The staff has received a petition requesting
the preparation of a feasibility report along with simultaneous
preparation of detailed plans and specifications for the installa-
tion of streets and utilities necessary to service the proposed
Greensboro Addition which is being considered for preliminary
plat approval later on the agenda. As a part of this petition,
the developer has agreed to guarantee all costs associated with
preparation of this report, plans and specifications if for
some reason the project is not approved at the time of the public
hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive a petition
for Project 470 (Greensboro Addition) and authorize the preparation
of a feasibility report, plans and specifications.
PROJECT 471/WEST SERVICE ROAD
L. Project 471, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (West
Service Road - Storm Sewer) --We have received a petition from
a representative of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
requesting the City of Eagan to prepare a feasibility report
along with detailed plans and specifications for the extension
of storm sewer laterals easterly along the West Service Road
from Center Court within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park
to provide storm water service for surface water -run-off fron
the development of Lots 16 - 20, Block 5, of that industrial
para subdivision. Being the owner of all affected lots, they
have waived their right to a public hearing and agreed to guar-
antee all costs associated with the preparation of these reports
if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of
the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To receive the petition
for Project 471 (West Service Road - Storm Sewer) and authorize
the preparation of the feasibility report and detailed plans
and specifications.
31
•
Agenda Information .iemo
February 18, 1985, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
PUBLIIG.. HEAR•I•NGS
PROJECT 460/NICOLS ROAD
A. Public Hearing for Project 460, Nicols Road (Streets - Beau
de Rue Drive to Kings ,Road), Continued from February 4, 1986,
Meeting --At the February 4th meeting, the Council held a public
hearing to consider the upgrading of Nicols Road from Beau de
Rue Drive to Kings Road. As a result of comments received from
that public hearing and the discovery of technical errors in
the publication process, the Council continued the public hearing
until February 18. All property owners that were not properly
noticed of the. February 4th meeting have been noticed of this
February 18 meeting. Due to the fact that all property owners
• had an opportunity to attend the February 4 meeting where the
project was discussed in considerable de''lail, the staff will
not repeat the detailed presentation at the February 18 meeting
unless requested to do so.
Considerable comments expressed at the February 4 hearing related
to the proposed four -lane design from Cliff Road to Diffley
Road and the width and location of the proposed eight -foot bitumi-
nous trail along the east side. As a result, the Council requested
staff to investigate the feasibility and related cost savings
associated with reducing the eight -foot bituminous trail to
six feet and to reducing the four -lane, 52 -foot width to a 46 -
foot width street for additional comments and consideration
at the February 18 meeting. Enclosed on pages 3#+ is a schematic
design showing how this reduced street width would accommodate
a present two-lane design with safety/parking shoulders which
could be incorporated into a four -lane segment at critical inter-
sections through proper striping and parking restrictions.
If it is determined that a full, four -lane section is needed
in the future to handle traffic volumes, the intersection design
striping could be extended through the entire length of the
roadway. Although this substandard, four -lane section would
not be able to handle projected future traffic volumes as effici-
ently as a full, 52 -foot,, four -lane section, it would still
be able to serve the primary function of handling greater capaci-
ties than a two -,lane street and providing turn lanes without
affecting through traffic movements.
Reducing the street width to 46 feet would result in an estimated
cost savings of approximately $600,000. In checking with several
bituminous contractors, it was determined that reducing the
trailway width from eight feet to six feet would not result
in any cost savings due to the limitations on present, state-of-
the-art paving equipment. while there would be a cost savings
37-
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Page Fifteen
:demo
City Council Fleeting
of material, the smaller trail would be higher labor intensive
due to special equipment that would be required which would
eliminate any cost savings.
If this project is to be constructed during 1986, it is important
that this project be approved as soon as possible so that detailed
plans and specifications can be completed and submitted to Munici-
pal State Aid for review and approval (four to six weeks) before
a contract can be awarded. The Public Works Director and Assistant
City Engineer will be available to discuss any additional items
pertaining to this project at the February 18 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 460 (Nicols Road - Streets) and if
approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi- •
cations.
n
U
33
a+s—,r_ _
1 2: _ -�—
_ Z -�
11'
to: t' TAPER
a����mA NO PARKING
Typical 46' Width at Major. Intersections.
PROJECT 460
NICOLS ROAD
46' WIDTH
g Parking/Safety Lane
;4
14 j
g Parking /Safety Lane
A
Striping
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
VACATION OF UTILTIY EASEMENT/NORTHVIEW MEADOWS ADDITION
B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement (Northview
Meadows Addition - Continued from February 4, 1986, Meeting) --At
the February 4 meeting, the Council opened the public hearing
to consider the vacation of common lot line- drainage and utility
easements over Lots 1-5, Block 4, Northview Meadows Addition.
The petition to vacate these easements resulted from the developers
request to consolidate these five lots into three lots and to
rededicate the new easements over the newly created lot lines..
However, this public hearing was continued because its approval
is subject to Council concurrence with the replatting of these
• five lots into three new lots which could not be scheduled until
February 18.
•
Therefore, this public hearing item should be continued until
later in the agenda to determine the outcome of the Council"s
consideration of item A under Old Business, revision of the
Northview Meadows preliminary plat.
Enclosed on page 37 is a sketch showing the location of
the easements requested to be vacated.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and to approve/deny the vacation of common lot line drainage and
utility easements over Lots 1-5, Block "4, Northview Meadows
Addition.
34
2v
:Ie are requesting to vacate all of the existin;; draina a and
utility easements within the followin-, descri!)ed lots:
Lot 'l, 2, 3, 4 and 5, hock 'b; :MT:IVI '. 't12A OWS,
accordin to the recorded plat therooi, Dakota County,
71innesota.
DRAINACE AND UTILITY I
EASEMENTS ARE S90WN TWS:
e �e
• �' !• dlh un! s alh¢rwise
ti C
P- 34o.�;j9F fr
---bd a0
i
-?99 48,
been¢ S.ree rn wr e s p��5 . 1 .
indicaled, and adjo;n;� 10/ lirxs, as )% 11 �ry h
schown and /reel l ees, at own o�njf�Me plo�joinin�Q I yy\�
s��• /
,- L
30J 30
,J0.01 49 ✓0.00 � : d = P9°a � � ��w�; /
6001
Iv1 I
rry1
_12e
I
�'--
490 -
I
r_
I�
_08-7
31.
W
: Fv
o l
-Z
r
' lel
�ry yl
""
OI
h
OI
��
gl
�N
•O `I
IN f
it
Ih �I
I
�
�'
NI
�I
,°�,
Nj
��
I
Ih
NI
'aA
1pQl
le .k
31
F� 14 I
151
I
16
I �I
I� V
'� I
oj�
16000 '
o -
' 60001
�---�
117
6000
L ----I
60.00 7
-o
8
i 55 I
z .
19
, y
1 .A�
.
240.00
IV 0'07'49"e
0
J
too 41.59,
a -37°00'00"
42 t
4,3>'
•••••••••••••• DE-WOrES CASEMEtUr TO
BC VACAaTBp.
Do 0 too 200
PAPN/C SCALE //t/ FEET 3�
Gal
Q11
Agenda Information Meno
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seventeen
VACATION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY/BLUE GENTIAN ROAD
C: Public Hearing for Vacation of Public Right -of -Way (Blue
Gentian Road - Continued from February 4, 1986 Meeting) --In response
to a petition received by the developers of the proposed Robins
Addition, the Council scheduled a public hearing to be held to
consider the vacation of that portion of Blue Gentian Road right-of-
way that remains after the road relocation and realignment,
associated with the construction.of I-494. Enclosed on page
is a copy of the proposed right-of-way vacation description.
This public hearing has been—continued from January 7 and. February
4 due to technical errors in the legal, publication process. All
notices have been sent to all potentially affected utility
companies. As of this date, staff has not received any objections
to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of the described portion of right-of-
way for Blue Gentian Road.
M
/�Vy-E'psSov/ijc�l, ane of
/YW Cor of yEi TATE �n��isfQ
.22
4
8 , 49�
�roPosed
7lioCIO l oid/i� //ire
0� cM1fi�on Grofoi� Rood of Se Z T.ZB P.23
�L yory �
r Crn1 TEAD, �.
� mon �Pc ,`•.
c
r• 1
aDy �o nCQ�YT/,qiy � �, j
9
6j76'�er _ �
RD�oSEo
o N, °
, ki
0
0
Scale
SA-THRE-BERGOUIST, INC. w0A
100 SOUTH BROADWAY, WAY2ATA, MN 55321 `lam r
TELEPHONE 612476.6000 7Y0 o'J
VACATION OF R.O.W.
for ROBINS ADD.
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Agenda Information
February 18, 198:6,
Page Eighteen
Memo
City Council Meeting
PROJECT 411, FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
D.. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 411 (Lillian McCarthy -
Trunk Storm Sewer, Continued from February 4, 1986 Meeting) --
On September 17, 1985, the original final assessment hearing was
scheduled for Project 411 which provided for the trunk storm sewer
outlet from Patrick Eagan Park. As a result of that final assess-
ment hearing, a written objection was submitted by the attorney
representing the Lillian McCarthy property on Lexington Avenue.
Subsequently, the final adoption of the final assessments against
the Lillian McCarthy property (parcel #10-02200-010-02) was
continued several times to allow review by the Special Assessment
• Committee which was performed on January 16, 1986_ Due to the
fact that the appellant did not appear at the Special Assessment
Committee meeting, the Council requested that formal notification
be sent to Lillian McCarthy informing her that the Council will
give formal consideration to this continued final assessment hearing
at the February 18 meeting.
Although the property incorporates 3.91 acres, only 1.5 acres
were assessed at the agricultural/single family rate due to the
"large lot" credit allocated to this parcel. All drainage from this
property directly enters Patrick Eagan Park where the storm sewer
system was installed. The location of this parcel in relationship
to the improvements under 411 and a topogra hic map confirming
directional drainage is enclosed on pages / through ��.
for the Council's information and review. The Special Assessment
Committee recommended that the assessment be reaffirmed as
• originally proposed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the final assessment for Project 411 to the Lillian
McCarthy property (parcel #10-02200-010-02) and, if approved,
authorize certification to Dakota County for collection.
110
El
c TJ
X
0
. JEX- LIFT - FT STA. 14
JP -II
F.K
—J,
-L2
HI L 'Z
HILLTOP
A HL 0
TOF
AZA EAGIti
PL
0 R T H
1000 2000
SCALE IN FEET
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
PATRICK EAGAN PARK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
BIRCH PARK ADDITION Consulting Engineers
STORM SEWER LAYOUT St. Paul, Minn.
Date: JUNE, 1984 PROJECT
POND JP -6, 7, 8, 9, 10 R, A7, 8 49 NO.
Agenda Information
February 18; 1985,
Page tlineteen
Memo
City Council fleeting
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT
LOTS 1 & 2. BLOCK 1. KNOB HILL OF EAGAN
E. Public Hearing, Vacation of Utility Easement for Lots 1 and
2, Block 1, Knob Hill of Eagan --On January 21, the Council received
a petition requesting the vacation of a portion of a common lot
line drainage and utility easement for Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Knob Hill of Ea an as identified by the map and description enclosed
on pages �7 through All notices have been sent
to all potentially affected utility companies and published in
the legal newspaper. As of this date, staff has not received
any comments or objections to this proposed vacation. This
• requested easement vacation is necessitated by the requirement
of the mortgage company financing one of the townhouses being
constructed where the concrete patio encroaches into the existing
easement.
11
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny the vacation of the common lot line drainage
and utility easement over Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Knob Hill of
Eagan.
i�5
•
•1
A
0
..- •y0O411.05
IN 00' 00" E 15 T 1
350.27
1 301
0 1,42 90 N79°58 27'rE /"� -1 Q u
-50
PROPOSED v ri� CY/°in°fe \ \ o
VAC.AT1oN Y 45o(v�i�'cose�'en� 1 \` r ;\\� /r
I T13 \
PROPOSED
DEDIC.AT1oN
I //•lIzX
30
2 r
63
d ral'(1a9
iZ7 N7203
� Nlk
v'9i
Lo
30 30
'.21 N
O i0
Op /O
0
IN /N m O
0
• v
/ X10 0.
3p�U)
30 / .e-Ufi/ify
T2� r� "
c1e,- -
k 28799_
. • ..,..� 312.99
ra'i,age e`
' O UTLOT
L t-
r4COUNTY STATE
A I D
H I G H
Lo
r7 I
o G
.-
so
Sov1!7 /ire
o�SEy
oFSZ
1.` (ij
_
McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS ■ PLANNERS
Reply To:
12800 Industrial Park Boulevard
Plymouth, Minnesota 55441
(612) 5593700
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION FOR
VACATING EASEMENTS
IN PLAT OF KNOB HILL
EAGAN
All that part of Lot 1, Block--I—,KNOB HILL OF EAGAN, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota lying -Northerly of the following.
described line:
Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence on an assumed
bearing of South 00 degrees 45 minutes 33 seconds East, along the west line
of said Lot 1 a distance of 10.00 feet to the point of beginning of said
line; thence North 89 degrees 14 minutes 27 seconds East 128.71 feet to the
northeasterly line of said Lot l and there terminating; except the west
30.00 feet thereof.
Job No. 6293
December 6, 1985
ED
Printed on recycled paper
i
ED
Printed on recycled paper
E
Agenda Information .1eno
February 18, 1985, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISION/NORTHVIEW MEADOWS
A. Preliminary Plat Revision for Northview Meadows --At the last
regular City Council meeting there was discussion regarding a
preliminary plat revision for Northview Meadows. Questions were
raised regarding the legal procedure for processing a preliminary
plat revision. According to the City Attorney's office a waiver
of plat or replat requires a public hearing before the Advisory
Planning Commission. A revision to a preliminary plat requires
a notification of the surro nu ding property owners but not a formal
public hearing by the Planning Commission. Therefore, the
preliminary plat revision of Northview Meadows as presented at
the February 4, City Council meeting is in order for consideration,.
For additional information on this item, refer to a memo prepared
by the City Planner enclosed on page(s) - 6'0
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat revision for Northview Meadows as presented.
W
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON REVISION TO THE NORTHVIEW MEADOWS PLAT
Since the February 3, 1986, City Council meeting, City staff has
legally noticed this particular agenda item and has also sent
notice to surrounding residents informing them the applicant is
proposing to revise this plat and to create three (3) lots versus
the five (5) that were originally proposed. Adequate' notice had
not been given previously for this procedure to take place.
In reviewing this revised plat.,- there were two processes the City
could have .used to resolve this issue. The first was to request a
• waiver of plat where legal descriptions would have been changed to
correspond with these new lot lines. However, the legal descrip-
tions were quite lengthy and would be cumbersome to follow in the
future for tracking particular parcels. Staff suggested to the
applicant to revise the plat so a new document would be recorded
showing the new lot configurations with the easements in place.
This is the best solution because the document is recorded
listing the legal description. The problem with the revised
document is that technically it should have taken approximately
four months to replat. To expedite closings and to get the best
document possible for the City, it was discussed among staff as a
way to expedite this process and to resolve a problem that
presently exists. In review of this total process, the only item
that would be affected in the City is the side lot easements, and
the public hearing has been advertised to vacate and relocate in
accordance with this new plan. It was discussed administratively
• that the City could expedite this process and help the developer
meet his time frame for the scheduled closings on the lots where
there are buildings located.
I am in the process of working with the Building Department to
determine how building permits have been -issued on the existing
lots. At the present time, the building officials are sceheduled
for a two-day conference but, hopefully, this information can be
obtained and explained to the Council with a memorandum or verbally
at the February 18 meeting.
If you need additional information, please feel free to contact me
at this office.
M
Cti " planner
DCR/jj
T�
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
<_ - DATE: FEBRUARY 30, 1986
SUBJECT: REVISION TO THE NORTHVIEW MEADOWS FINAL PLAT
Northview Meadows was one of the first small lot subdivisions ._.
platted within the City. The five lots, which the applicant
is requsting to revise into three, have some different circumstances.
Concerning lot 1, located on the corner of South Wescott Hills
Drive and Braddock-Trail,,the builder did not take into account
that South Wescott Hills Drive would require a larger setback
than from a normal residential street. Therefore, the " first
building encroachedinto a portion of another lot to the east
of lot 1. Lots 4 and 5 are presently the location of the old
existing Trapp Farm Homestead. When looking at renovating or.
selling the home as is, it was found to be impossible to add
a garage on the same lot as the existing house. There would
have to be additional. easements or a portion of the lot to the
west would have to be obtained in order to get a driveway around
the west side of the house and still stay within the lot. Since
there are three existing homes and closings are set for two of
the properties, staff is suggesting that a revision to the plat
be allowed in this instance because we are reducing five lots
into three with there being no room for an additional home on
these three lots. In reviewing the requirements of the City,
it has been determined that the only item needed would be to
vacate the public easements on the original lot lines creating
new easements for..these new lots.
The public hearing has been scheduled for February 4, 1986 to •
vacate these easements but the City does not wish to vacate unless
the Council approves the revision to the final plat and establishes
the new easements in accordance with this -revision. The Development
Contract, along with ..all other items for platting, was completed
with the original Northview Meadows final plat. The circumstances
are. unique -but.. because the the changes are minor, it appears
•-that this process would be feasible to expedite the process and
eliminate the extensive paperwork required if we could not modify
the plat in this manner.
Very truly yours,
Dale Runkle/jbd ,.
REVISION TO NORTHVIEW MEADOWS
1 . /
Ato
Si 1
;_ 'i • O
• a
dEe
eda a 1 c n
L_ H
WI..fL wo mum uuw.n _
'kPo'+ r w•• !•el
. a
\(IJI • � L il— 4
r'^ _I____I ____1_ • 0.01111" maNIT FLIM -
e umu all • ! a• I"
Itl..IO YI w IIUW LI
\Ly \
"IN 1 IIII II v111Y u0 - A.L.S. i. JIM
t • Npl.li 1011101 .i II
• \ nn a
IMM m uonlr
II411u 101011E
w n ti!.
0
... u........iiii •
. . I I ...I........... •.
� ..........III ......I. I.... .. �.........
.PPS
....a.LTT
JAMES R.
SHEET E Of 7
LPLeffitL,�Aflr
cA.
--r.r_
a'
f, S
L''
CUY � I
sddimv tti rim, Rim.
•unla m wain l.11re.n
m ••r rae,
Ilr n rlln m
lel lull m I
nn m uami
U mmlltlll
'm PLAT.
REVISION TO NORTHVIEW MEADOW;
DRAINAGE PLAN
I
c
V �%
-
n non unlrr ro nuuco. r.u.. mr nu ..mr,
rw 01 nrort ru noon n .1 or.ueu.n Juar
I
-
-
- eieririii i.vi of iulrini ei mminu 'M all
ll 1i
nr or Jrnul. ml.
uenl, I'M r..Ill, IIID. -
1W
_
w.c. c. r.rm
nuuon ucun
I
r
• ■OPrll la r011• -
I
mmill IIP a• P
• nI W IY
r1Oii!:r�illmi...ern
roercr oa
rooe.r.•rEJAMES
R. HILL, INC.
.us
•�9e1
En•lun / 6nvrm.,.— Z.ra
uo. .r.......0
•
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
PARK CONSULTANT APPOINTMENT
FEE SCHEDULE CONSIDERATION
B. Park Consultant Appointment and Fee Schedule Consideration --
At the January 21, 1986, organizational meeting there was question
regarding the rate schedule that would be charged by Tim Erkkila
since his merger with Westwood Planning and Engineering Company.
Tim Erkkila under the business name of Erkkila and Associates
was hired to prepare the park master plan and work as a consultant
for certain projects that were approved as a part of the park
referendum. Mr. Erkkila has—responded with a letter, see pages
5$ through 53 , that explains his merger with Westwood
Planning and Engineering Company and also the fee schedule that
will be charged during 1986.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
hiring of Westwood Planning and Engineering Company as the City's
park consultant for calendar 1986.
1511
WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
X, -
February 7, 1986
Mr. Tom Hedges, Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Re: Consultation Fees Proposal
Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
Recently, I submitted a fees schedule for unscheduled park planning and
design services for 1986. I understand some clarification has been
• requested.
ERKKILA & ASSOCIATES MERGER WITH WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING
COMPANY - Originally (since 1981) and for several years following,
Eagan utilized my services through my company known as Erkkila &
Associates. On January 1, 1985, two weeks after issuing my 1985 rate
schedule to you I merged with Westwood Planning and Engineering
Company. Through all of 1985, Westwood Planning & Engineering Company
honored the Erkkila & Associates work arrangement. Essentially, the
11new11 arrangement will be the same as last year except the fee
arrangement changed slightly.
1.
The merger involved the professional personnel of Erkkila & Associates
joining Westwood. My previous personnel (Gordon Anderson and Anne
Deuring) plus two planners of the Westwood's staff came under my
direction. In summary, Eagan had no change of service (myself and my
• old staff) plus additional staff in the area of planning and
engineering. This merger strengthened the park planning and design
services available to the City of Eagan.
2. CHANGE RATES - As identified in my letter proposal of January 9, 1986
there is a change in hourly rates. Gordon.Anderson and Anne Deuring
(original Erkkila & Associates peronnel) charge rates go to $28.50 per
hour from $25.00 per hour. My charge rate becomes $54.00 per hour.
These increases are certainly comparable or better than consulting
fee's the City has with it's other outside personnel and I would
welcome a comparison if necessary. I am a registered Landscape Archi-
tect with 15 years of experience. Anne Deuring is a registered Land-
scape Architect with 7 years of experience, Gordon Anderson is a
graduated Landscape Architect with 9 years of experience. The
increase was overdue and intentially not instituted on January 1, 1985
to ease the perceived transition from the entity of Erkkila &
Associates to Westwood Planning & Engineering Company. I remain the
primary project manager for Eagan Parks work and utilize my experi-
enced personnel (Anne and Gordon) on your work. The larger increase
in my charge rate is not exptected to effect your overall costs sig-
nificantly since 90 percent of your work is done by personnel at the
lower rate.
7415 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5U26 (612) 5460155 �.Z
3. GENERAL - I believe my historic insight in the development of the
present park system in Eagan gives me a particularly useful position
since no other firm can. This "edge" is not utilized in our pricing of
services to you. We have carefully attempted to price our services
within or below prevailing rates (we are using a 1984 rate table)
because we wish to continue to serve the City of Eagan. Our proposal
is intended to serve the city well by,providing needed services by
experience personnel at the best possible cost.
I hope this letter clarifies our fee's proposal of 1986. Westwood Planning
b Engineering Company is very interested in serving Eagan, through all it's
resources, but specifically through myself and my staff. The name change
to Westwood has done nothing to diminish the quality of services provided
to Eagan. I will be willing to attend a council meeting if necessary to
entertain any further question_ -
Sincerely,
WESTWOOD PLANNING S ENGINEERING COMPANY
d;W&d1a
Tim Erkkila, ASIA
Vice President, Planning
TE: pan
cc: Ken Vraa
S3
LIN
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1985, City Council .Meeting
Page Twenty -Two
GUN CLUB LAKE
WATERSHED APPOINTMENTS
C. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission—
Enclosed on pages &�- through SP` is a letter that was
sent out Tuesday, February 11, as directed by the City Council
seeking interest in the appointment to the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission. Those persons that were given consideration
at the last City Council meeting are: Jim Unker; Mike Beard,
Brad Farnum and Steve Galligan. At the time this memo was prepared
there had not been an indication expressed by any of these persons
• regarding interest in an appointment to the Commission. The City
Administrator will provide further update at the meeting on Tuesday.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint three (3) members
to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission of which
one of those persons is proposed to be Tom Colbert, Director of
Public Works.
0
. X141, tl.ifay rani [i
T <i11
lllii .,
U
Recently, appointments were made to several volunteer committees
and commissions that advise the City Council on issues such
as land use planning, parks and recreation, airport noise, cable
television and economic development. It has been the policy
of the City that whenever a new committee or commission is or-
ganized or vacancies occur in one of the standing committees,
those persons who have previously expressed interest in seeking
an appointment are contacted first.
The City has two (2) vacancies. on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission. According to recent State legislation,
each community within the Metropolitan Area is required to enter
into a joint powers agreement establishing a watershed management
organization. The Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission
consists of land area within Eagan, Mendota Heights, and Inver
Grove Heights. Most of the watershed area is located within
the City of Eagan.
• The City Council is considering appointments at the February
18, 1986, meeting. If you are interested in being considered
for an appointment on this commission, please indicate by checking
the appropriate yes or no on the enclosed form and return in
the self-addressed envelope to the attention of the City Admini-
strator. For more information on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission, refer to a copy of a memo that was recently
prepared by the Director of Public Works for consideration by
the City Council.
As always, we appreciate your interest in serving as a volunteer
in our community.
Sinc2rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/kf J'5
THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21109
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
Mayor
'PHONE (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VAC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
February 10, 1986
CoonaaA Members
THOMAS HEDGES
CaryA ministrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
U
Recently, appointments were made to several volunteer committees
and commissions that advise the City Council on issues such
as land use planning, parks and recreation, airport noise, cable
television and economic development. It has been the policy
of the City that whenever a new committee or commission is or-
ganized or vacancies occur in one of the standing committees,
those persons who have previously expressed interest in seeking
an appointment are contacted first.
The City has two (2) vacancies. on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission. According to recent State legislation,
each community within the Metropolitan Area is required to enter
into a joint powers agreement establishing a watershed management
organization. The Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission
consists of land area within Eagan, Mendota Heights, and Inver
Grove Heights. Most of the watershed area is located within
the City of Eagan.
• The City Council is considering appointments at the February
18, 1986, meeting. If you are interested in being considered
for an appointment on this commission, please indicate by checking
the appropriate yes or no on the enclosed form and return in
the self-addressed envelope to the attention of the City Admini-
strator. For more information on the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Commission, refer to a copy of a memo that was recently
prepared by the Director of Public Works for consideration by
the City Council.
As always, we appreciate your interest in serving as a volunteer
in our community.
Sinc2rely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/kf J'5
THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
GUN CLUB LAKE
WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION
Yes, I am interested in serving on the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Commission
No, I am not interested in serving on the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management_Commission but keep my
name on file for vacancies on other Committees/
Commissions.
Please remove my name from consideration for vacancies
on any committees/commissions at this time.
Name
Address
Phone Number
•
--.
•
Agenda Information Memo
February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty-four
GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION ---
D. Appointments to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commis-
sion --At the last regular City Council meeting, staff was directed
to prepare additional information regarding the responsibilities
of Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission members. The
City of Eagan is responsible for the appointment of three members
to that watershed management group. It is recommended that
the Director of Public Works be one of those appointments.
According to recent state legislation, each community within
the metropolitan area was required to enter into a Joint Powers
Agreement establishing a Watershed Management Organization (WMO).
This Joint Powers Agreement provided for the establishment of
a Commission to manage the affairs of this WMO. The makeup
of this Commission is to consist of three representatives from
the City of Eagan and two representatives each from Mendota
Heights and Inver Grove Heights. This seven -member Commission
would serve in its capacity through the establishment and adoption
of the WMO's management plan after which Mendota Heights and
Inver Grove Heights would withdraw one member each, leaving
a five -member Commission to manage the ongoing affairs of the
WMO.
The purpose of this WMO is to provide an organization to preserve
and use the natural water storage and retention of the Gun Club
Lake Watershed to:
a. Reduce to the greatest practical extent capital expenditures
necessary to control excessive volumes and rates of runoff.
b. Improve water quality.
c.
Prevent
flooding and
erosion from surface flows.
d.
Promote
ground water
recharge.
e. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water
recreational facilities.
•f. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper manage-
ment of surface water.
g. Carry out- all 'the duties and responsibilities outlined
in Minnesota Statutes 473.875 through 473.883.
Other than the Director of Public Works, the staff does not
have any other recommendations .for representatives to this Commis-
sion. It is anticipated that the Commission will meet monthly
until the WMO's operational and management plan has been completed
and, thereafter, 2-3 times a year for organizational business
-(i.e. budget, capital improvement, permit issuance, etc.)
6
Agenda Information Memo
February 4, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty-five
The Director of Public Works will be available to discuss in
further detail the purpose and responsibilities of the WMO to
help the Council arrive at proper representative appointments.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint three members
to represent the City of Eagan to the Gun Club Lake Watershed
Management Organization.
16-
C•
Agenda Information
February 18, 1985,
Page Twenty -Three
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/UTILITY BUILDING
NORTHWESTERN BELL
D. Conditional Use Permit for Utility Building, Northwestern
Bell Telephone at Diffley Road/West of Dodd Road --The conditional
use permit for consideration of a utility building located south
of C.R. 30 and west of Dodd Road was continued at the January
21 meeting to allow Northwestern Bell Telephone an opportunity
to consider a site that is more aesthetically pleasing to the
p
neighborhood. Attached on pages � through (0-6 is
a copy of the original report that was submitted for consideration
by the Planning Commission and City Council. According to Mr.
Bob Dokken, it will be possible to move the location of the utility
building further south on the church property. The revised sketch
plan is copied on pages 64 through for your review.
Enclosed on page() (a V is a copy of a letter that was sent
to Northwestern Bell by the City Administrator that addresses
action that was taken by the City Council at the last regular
meeting. This action pertains to the Blackhawk Road site and
a, request that future, planning of utility buildings be more closely
coordinated with the City's Planning Department. It is expected
that Mr. Dokken will be at the City Council meeting on Tuesday
and would like an opportunity to update the City Council on the
status of the Blackhawk Road utility building site.
In addition to the planned sites, Northwestern Bell is considering
two additional sites which are referenced as Site 2 and Site
3.. Enclosed on pages? hrough ZZ are copies of those
site plans and a location map.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
request of Northwestern Bell Telephone Company for a utility build-
ing located on County Road 30, west of Dodd Road and more specifi-
cally property that is owned by the South District Lutheran Church
Missouri Synod.
69
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TELEPHONE UTILITY BUILDINGS
APPLICANT: NORTHWESTERN BELL
LOCATION:
1)
SE ;
of SECTION 17
2)
NWa
of SECTION 25
EXISTING ZONING:
1)
R-3
(TOWNHOUSE)
2)
P.D.
(LEXINGTON SOUTH)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DECEMBER
19, 1985
DATE OF REPORT:
DECEMBER
3, 1985
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for Conditional
Use Permits to allow two separate telephone equipment buildings.
As with previous applications, these buildings will be termination
points for telephone cables from the central office and provide
service to additional customers. Both structures, 16' x 17'/272
square feet will be made of brick and have gabled roofs. There
will be an access drive with 'T' turn arounds.
BUILDING SITE 1: SEa OF SECTION 17
This parcel, part of a 1.73 acre single family lot, is on the
C;4 SE corner of the Robin Lane and Blackhawk Road intersection.
Measuring 60' x 70', this 4200 sq ft site will have access from
Robin Lane. The 14' drive will be bituminous but not have curb
and gutter. City policy is to not require curb/gutter for single
use access.. Building front yard setbacks are shown at 30' and
have Code compliance. The rear and side yard setbacks of 141'
• and 22' respectively are within Code requirements for accessory
structures. The bituminous drive will be 4' from the property
line at the southern most point and no dimension is given from
the Robin Lane property line to the turnaround area.
BUILDING SITE 2: NWe OF SECTION 25
This 60' x 80', 4800 sq ft parcel is on the northwest corner
of the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church property fronting on County
Road 30. The property to the west is the preliminary platted
Sunset 10th Addition. Calvary Memorial Church will be the closest
structure to the subject area. All building setbacks meet Code
compliance requirements. The 14' drive turnaround is set back
11! from the C.R. 30 property line. Other drive setbacks are
within City Code. As with building site 1,_ the bituminous surface
will not require curb and gutter.
NOTE: Both' sites have signed option agreements with the current
land owner and copies are included in the City files.
Site 1 has some existing
applicant will provide a
to building permit issuance
trees but
landscape
60
Site 2 has no trees. The
plan for Staff review prior
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
TELEPHONE UTILITY BUILDINGS
DECEMBER 19, 1985
Page 2 \ :?
If approved, the Conditional Use Permits shall be subject to
landscape plan approval by Staff and all other applicable ordi-
nances.
•
l
PROPOS[=. �
oi3iNANS
w
1
v
,4N
rn (77% T
APC Minutes f,
December 19, 1985
3. That liquor shall be sold only in conjunction with the sale and
consumption of food on the premises.
All voted yea.
VILLAGE BUILDERS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PYLON SIGN
Chairman Hall then convened the public hearing upon the application of
Village Builders for a pylon sign located west of Highway 413 and south of
Shawnee Road, for AL1 -American Self Storage. City Planner Runkle described
the proposed two-sided interior lighted sign which would measure 8 feet by 9
feet with an overall height not to exceed 27 feet. It appeared that there
were no adjacent lots that were as yet undeveloped that would be affected by
the placement of a sign, as far as their own signage. Harrison moved, Wold
seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a
pylon sign for AL1 -American Self Storage, west of Highway #13 and south of
Shawnee Road, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot be paid.
2. That all other applicable ordinances be complied with.
3. That the sign not deviate from the specifications presented to staff.
All voted in favor.
NORTHWESTERN BELL - CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
TELEPHONE UTILITY BUILDINGS
Chairman Hall then called the hearing upon the request of Northwestern
Bell for two conditional use permits for two separate telephone equipment
buildings, one located at the southeast corner of Robin Lane and Blackhawk
Road and the other at the northwest corner of the Missouri Synod Lutheran
Church property fronting on County Road 30. Dale Runkle described the
structures as being identical to existing structures in the City of Eagan,
consisting of brick with gabled roofs and access drives with 'T' turn arounds.
Mr. Bob Docken, the realtor representing Northwestern Bell and in charge of
locating the site described, was present to describe the proposals in greater
detail. He indicated that he had talked to neighboring homeowners that did
not object to the facilities. Mr. Robert Saleck of 3741 Blackhawk Road did
appear to object to the application. His home is located north of Robin Lane
and north of the house across Robin Lane and directly north of the proposed
site. It was pointed out that there had been a lack of landscaping on
previous such facilities. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to
'recommend approval of the conditional use permits, subject to a landscape plan
approved by staff and all other applicable ordinances. All voted in favor.
Harrison then moved, Wilkins. seconded the motion to recommend that the
City 'contact Northwestern Bell in regard to the landscaping of all such
facilities as described in the above conditional use permit request. :All
C voted in favor.
r=te
0
•
/
lr
.��_
ft ,l I
:t,. ,�!P fV:f rllr
a.s•,i
{ .
fi
•
S
� -.
00
c i � l luaij ` v i5 y„r
I..p.
•
.,. , . , 5
,•,
}
I c == v,,. EKY
-
r`ol
.ower
I
.-
_
-
q�4L.
,
—v�iEc,ATv
4
l / r
i
LANDSCAPE.
PLAN
PRpPossD
PLybR
; :r
92rro
.
CWM&15 7I4,-
,
6tJILDItJL1_-
�L g14 S' f .
,. 4 �
a�
�
I-.
Giyy 1
ff i�
Y•
14 l
a:" S I
'�
♦'.iTd 5
yet' 'y�
/
928
fi
S
� -.
c i � l luaij ` v i5 y„r
•
.,. , . , 5
,•,
}
I c == v,,. EKY
4
l / r
LANDSCAPE.
PLAN
i
i
. �—EpC�E"off 61TLJMINouS -- ---:.-
3 0 _ 918 I'� °i10 _ 921
\ �� N
e�,�
0
--
FRO"tp FZ1W LIN2
.1924 / 92er /
:9`_:
qjo o
0 oSED �+ 931
6;1 -----
y
m
�7
NORTHWES-TERN BELL..IELI
r
�7
NORTHWES-TERN BELL..IELI
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 M�,
PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
February 10, 1986 MCELLISON
"THEODORE WACHTER"
ALMA FITZLOFF, ASST MGR REAL ESTATE THOMAS
em HEDGES
S
NORTHWESTERN BELL ❑N AaminBtrow
70 W 4TH ST, RM 1C EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
ST PAUL MN 55102 ONCle`"
Re: Proposed Switching Station on Blackhawk Road
And Policy for Future Site Selections
Dear Ms. Fitzloff:
• In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a
regular meeting held on Tuesday, February 4, 1986, there was
direction given to the Director of Parks & Recreation to further
work with representatives of Northwestern Bell to locate the
Blackhawk Road switching station in the proposed Blue Cross Park
adjacent to Blue Cross Road. It is the City's intention to close
on the Blue Cross parkland and develop Blue Cross Park during
1986. Members of the City Council feel it is in the best interest
of Eagan to work together on siting a building in Blue Cross Park.
It is my understanding that Northwestern Bell has given considera-
tion to the abandonment of that location. However, as stated, we
hope you will continue reviewing alternatives which include further
discussion with our Director of Parks and Recreation, Mr. Ken
Vraa, of the Blue Cross Park site.
• The City Council also included in the aforementioned motion the
suggestion of a policy that Northwestern Bell contact the City
Planning Department in the future before real estate negotiations
commence regarding the siting of another switching station. It is
important to the City Council that the staff be involved in the
planning process regarding any future site --selections which could .
eliminate neighborhood controversy and enhance site sensitivity.
Please coordinate these efforts with Mr. Dale Runkle, our City
Planner.
Again, for additional information
Road switching station, contact
selections, contact Dale Runkle,
454-8100.
or action regarding the Blackhawk
Mr. Ken Vraa, or for future site
both of whom can be reached at
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedge
City Administrator
cc: Ken Vraa, Dir of Parks & Recreation/Dale Runkle, City Planner
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
kA1K1w1
Il� 6 51
N
Agenda Information
February 16, 1986,.
Page Twenty -Four
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY_P.LAT AND REZONING/GREENSBORO
E. Preliminary Plat for 90 Single -Family Lots on 40 Acres and
a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PD (Planned Development) --
The City Council reviewed rezoning and preliminary plat applications
for the Greensboro project as submitted by Dave Gabbert at the
February 4, 1986 meeting. Direction was given to the developer
toeliminatethe cul-de-sac by causing that street to become a
through street and further that all lots be increased in size
to meet the 12,000 square foot minimums. For a copy of the revised
preliminary plat and comments by the City Planning Department
refer to .pages��3 through For a copy of the
information that w s submitted with the last City Council packet
refer to pages 177 through 189 of the February 4 Agenda Information
Memo. A question was raised at the last City Council meeting
regarding suitable zoning if all lots were to be 12,000 square
feet. Whether R-1 or Planned Development zoning is allowed for
this development the R-1 standards, as set forth in the zoning
Ordinance, can be enforced,. Since the application for rezoning
was from an A to PD, the Development Agreement would state that
all development criteria must meet R -1 -requirements as set forth
in the City Zoning Ordinance. A change to the R-1 zoning would
require a new public hearing before the Planning Commission during
March, delaying any further consideration on the preliminary plat
until the first meeting in April.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny
rezoning from A to PD with the requirement in the Development
® Agreement that all R-1 standards be met according to the Zoning, -
Ordinance. 2) To approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled
Greensboro Addition.
7�_
MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: GREENSBORO REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT
It is our understanding at the February 4, 1986,.City Council
meeting that the plat is still going to proceed under the Planned
Development zoning designation. However, all lots still must meet
the 12,000 sq. ft. criteria. Therefore, a Planned Development
Agreement will also be required for this development. The applicant
has resubmitted the site plan showing the northern cul-de-sac
removed, 60 ft. right-of-ways and lots which were to meet 12,000
sq. ft. In a quick review, staff has found one lot which does
•not meet the 12,000 sq. ft. criteria. While in this review, it
should be pointed out that all lots shall meet 85 ft. lot width at
the 30 ft. setback and a minimum of 12,000 sq. ft. In review of
this plan, it appears there is adequate room to shift lot lines
and allow the one lot to increase square footage up to the 12,000
sq. ft.
The attached exhibit was received late and is not as clear as what
we would like to present to the City Council. Staff will work
with the exhibit on an overhead Tuesday which will make the
exhibit more legible for the presentation. The conditions still
shall apply which were in the staff report for the original plat.
If anyone has any questions or would like additional information
on this development, please contact me at City Hall.
• 122
Pla er
DCR/j j
73
Preliminary Plat Of:
GREENSBORO
DELIMAR H. SCHWANZ
LAND SURVEYORS INC
Raa:9.rM Under Lav$ of The Stale of M:nne3oln
14750 SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55066 PHONE,612 423-1769
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
.__Owner: Edmund Meisinger Jr. etal.
Developer: Gabbert Development, Inc.
1955 East Wayzata Blvd.
Wayzata, Mn. 55391
PPesent Zoning: Agriculture
Proposed Zoning: R-1 Single Family
Legal Description:
The Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 14, Township
27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota.
AREAS.
1 Total Plat - 40.23 Acres
2 All individual lots and outlots - 34.73 Ac.
3 Public right-of-way - 5.50 Ac.
4 Park Land - 0
DENS2TY' CALCULATIONS:
1) Units per acre for total plat - I.99
2 Units per acre for total plat lees right-of-way - 2.37
3 Units per acre for total plat less right-of-way and park land
combined - 2.30
Proposed drainage and utility. easements to be 10 feet in width and •
adjoining street and 5 feet in width and adjoining side and rear lot
lines unless otherwise shown.
Prepared by: Delmar H. Schwanz
Land Surveyors, Inc.
14750 South Robert Tr.
Rosemount, Mn. 55068
Date of preparation: November 27, 1985.
Revised February 13, 1986
r
119 " A
MINNESOTA REGISTRATION NO. 8625
l.�
EJ I PREUM1RAgr'FI_AT�4� .G ENSBOR '%
I �I ! ( • 1 ,p� � � r i , y� 1 1 ( I � I
v 15,Is Ifi t. p_
.`!, 1� 1 -�.f• I •�. 1 r ,� , ILII
- per- 1 / .. �,I Y , !/ � 1'� p q•, � � `!_� � LD�I� -I IfJ � :�
LE IWCH�CqFE T
t n.. ,, \ /
T, rl 111•
� \� = (( �Iri '. �\ 110•, ..I I E 1\ � of m.lfi � \�� � � i� •R 9 \\\ ` / 1� li
I,12 01 ���\.1;' 1
601 Lx'I
\l I/
III • • 1 \ . �"/ J/ /� - ' ' � / 9 -- - ' �11; `' I�
?r 1 •• I E �1 \\,\ -. II I ' �/.ii. p/ � � /,/ � �( 41 � -1 f Ef -19 I � it .) �� III 12°. I�� 2
ERE.RED Rr , / I <. � �', t � � 11 1 \� I r ( / -'� .' l/ / /, � •. I �, � 1 - .
1\ I. OELWR H. UHW4
111-'1� J Lud auRvf(roRe IHc. \\ , E ! /I • r' / �D' a I / ' I
9 ^ R. ! I' ` '"( twP 20 !, / �II 134•, 1.
_4
1�.. I '/' E1� 1 1�1� 1 nl Ii ' 1 v Irl l• E'21 �rt.ii .-. •Ih
to EI 2 -.. -E III1 �/ ' ` 1 II',u (. \,1 22
���/,I -''1• l�rl�llal \p �• /yI /` 2
6 / \ a ''e
_ ; •� <. i p I _�/ I '`.f e IJ�/ Ill '1�4 �1.•Q 8.3�'.
��e�
al
WESCOTT __ - L - _ E ROAD
Agenda Information Memo
February 18, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
CONTRACT 85-21, CONCEPT DESIGN APPROVAL (MAINTENANCE GARAGE)
F. Contract 85-21, Concept Design Approval (Maintenance Garage
Expansion) --During the past 2-3 months, the staff has held a series
of design consideration meetings with the architect to arrive
at a concept design for the new expansion and remodeling of the
Maintenance Garage Facility. Through input from representatives
of the Public Works and Parks Maintenance operations, the consultant
has prepared this final concept design layout which should receive
formal Council approval before proceeding with the detailed design
phase associated with plans—and specifications and final budget
estimates. Enclosed on pages ___ZZ tthrough ,Q is informa-
tion pertaining to this final concept design as provided by Bohrman
IF Architects. This information and a three dimensional scale model
will be reviewed and discussed by the architect to answer any
questions the Council may have at this point in the design process.
The staff is very pleased and quite excited with the architectural
design that has been incorporated into this Maintenance Facility
which we feel will greatly minimize the potential negative impact
that might be associated with this facility being surrounded by
residentially zoned property.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify the concept
design for the proposed Maintenance Garage expansion and if
approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi-
cations.
•
74�
Agenda Information
February 18., 1980,
Page Twenty -Six
Memo
City Council Mee"ing
REVIEW OF ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE POLICY
A. Review of On -Sale Liquor License Policy --At the last regular
City Council meeting there were questions raised about current
regulatory language in the City Code that requires all on -sale
liquor licenses to meet a $200,000 valuation test. The City staff
was directed to review various options for the City Council to
consider to better regulate the issuance of on -sale liquor licenses.
The City staff has reviewed valuation, seating capacity, food/
liquor ratio, geographic locations and the concept of reserving
• certain licenses. 'These alternatives are discussed in a memo
prepared by Administrat've Assistant Witt and is enclosed on pages
through There are .so many choices for the
C tC t ncil to consider regarding the regulation of on -sale liquor
licenses. Once a general discussion and further direction is
given, the City staff will be able to firm up a policy for
consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To review changes to the
on -sale liquor license policy and direct the City staff to draft
specific language for policy change.
rvL]
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1986
SUBJECT: ON -SALE LIQUOR
By State statute, the City of Eagan is allowed 18 on -sale liquor
licenses until the population reaches 45,000. For each 2,-500
increase thereafter, another license may be issued. There are
currently nine active licenses in Eagan and their locations are
shown on the map. The first license was issued in 1973, two in
1974, one each in 1976 and 1979, three in 1982 and one in 1983.
A survey of metro area communities was undertaken and the results
are shown on the chart. Staff learned that several variables
could be involved in the issuing of licenses. Various options to
regulate issuance of licenses include:
1. Valuation: If valuation is used, the term must be defined as
to what is and what is not included. Eagan requires an
appraised value of $200,000 as to the building or portion of
building associated with liquor sales. Staff has assumed
that this refers to the County Assessor's figure of estimated
market value and does not include land or any items such as
fixtures or equipment not included by the Assessor.
Burnsville requires a $1,000,000 valuation which includes
fees, site development, construction costs, utilities,
furnishings and fixtures, but not land.
The County Assessor's values for free standing structures and
a facility in a strip shopping center differ. The major
• factor in a strip center is the square footage of the
building and land. The type of use is not included in calcu-
lations because it changes constantly. The assessor does
make adjustments based on vacancy rates in a center. Right
now the Cedar -Cliff occupancy rate is high and its
building/land value is higher than for the Flour Bin across
the street. The assessor said the City would have to break
out building/land costs for a particular center occupant
through whatever methods they choose; the County only asses-
ses as a whole.
At least ,some of the current holders of Eagan on -sale liquor
licenses do not meet valuation requirements but I believe
were grandfathered in when the Ordinance was adopted, or the
valuation was not considered when the license was issued.
The Valley Lounge, Richard's Food and Liquor and the
Mediterranean Cruise have payable 1985 valuations of
$105.,500, $98,600 and $147,400, respectively, including both
land and building. The Cedarvale Bowl and the Eagandale Club
probably do -not meet the valuation test either when it is
applied against the portion of the building relating to food
and liquor. 9�
2. Seating Capacity - Square Footage: Most communities set a
larger minimum seating capacity than Eagan. The higher
number tends to increase the valuation and decrease the
possibility of a "night club" facility. Although without a
food percentage requirement being enforced, size/seating
capacity may just produce larger facilities selling primarily
liquor.
3. Food -Liquor Ratio: This option also serves to promote
restaurant and decrease "night clubs" by requiring a greater
percentage of the business be with the food operation.
Brooklyn Center directly ties the license fee to the food
percentage and found this to be an effective means to
discourage "night clubs" and bars. An auditor's services
would be required to validate the food -liquor .ratio. Eagan
has not conducted any reviews of any establishment that I am
aware of, instead relying on good faith, voluntary compli-
ance.
4. Location: Whether to allow or disallow an liquor
establishment in a strip center has not been an issue in most
cities. If the applicant meets the Code requirements, he can
locate in any area zoned to allow such an establishment. In
Eagan, on -sale licenses can be a conditional use in the
following zones:
Limited Business - LB
Neighborhood. Business - NB
General Business - GB
Community Shopping Center - CSC
Regional Shopping Center - RSC
Roadside Business - RB (is &,.permitted use)
Limited Industrial and General Industrial allow
beer and wine only.
Given that information,- it may be appropriate to limit
licenses issued to smaller or lower valuation establishments
geographically so as to dispense a pre -determined number
throughout the community. This approach would be similar to
the current status of off -sale licenses. Without that
restriction, there is a staff concern about small strip
shopping centers having two or three licenses. For example,
both Slicers and Hong Wong in Cedar -Cliff.
5. Reserved Licenses: Most communities have many inactive
licenses and do not feel the need to reserve licenses. Eagan
may want to divide up the current maximum number available. to
different types or different valuation levels thereby
reserving a number of licenses for various types of
establishments.
The City Code currently incorporates four of these five possi-
bilities into issuance of on -sale licenses excluding only
geographic locations. The current combination of relatively low
seating capacity and license fee make liquor sales an economic
S71-5
possibility for a large number of businesses. The valuation
restrictions and food ratios while easy to define in a schedule
are very difficult to monitor and enforce. Any new schedule
based on valuation should incorporate existing licenses and not
just grandfather them which would generate a rather large number
in the lower valuation group and necessitate some review of
licenses such as Cedarvale Bowl.
C&
Adm' istrative Assistant
LW/E7V/kf
cc: E. J. VanOverbeke, Finance Director/City Clerk
•
ON -SALE LIQUOR INFORMATION
METRO AREA COMMUNITIES
�77
SEATING/
RESERVED
I FOOD
COMMUNITY
VALUATION
SQ. FOOT.
LICENSES
LOCATION %
FEE
Apple Valley
N/A
50(1200 )
none
none
none
$5000
Brooklyn Center
N/A
150
none
none
80%
$8000
50-79%
$11,000
_
40-49%
$14,000
Burnsville
$1,000,000
50
A-Restaurantnone
none
;;$5000
(includes
B -Restaurant
everything
in hotel/
but land)
motel
Coon Rapids
N/A
150
none
none
none
$5000
Maple Grove
N/A
none none none
I none
$4500
(Zoning ordinance might dictate
seating, square footage reqs.
On -sale liquor license does
not specify.)
Mendota Height
N/A
50min. none
none
none
$10,00
(open to public
75 max.
$3000
N/A
(limited service) --
100 none
none
50%
$7500
Minnetonka
Eagan
$200,000
30
PUD agreements $3500
may specify #
$500,000
1
of licenses per
Development
1 60%I
�77
CITY OF EAGAN
1. 'Al Baker's '83
3434 Washington Dr
2, Cedarvale Bowl 177
3883 Beau d'Rue Dr
3. Durnings '82
4625 'Nicola Rd
4. Eagandale Club �7q
3330 Pilot Knob Rd
5. LaFonda'a 76
3665 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
6: Mediterranean Cruise
3945 Sibley Mem. Hwy,.8.
7. Richard's Food 6 Liquo
4185 S. Robert Trai1,8.
8. Starks Saloon '73
3125 Dodd Rd
9. Valley Lounge '74
3385 Sibley Mem. Hwy.-
•
1986
ON -SALE LIQUOR LOCATIONS
Agenda Information
February 1Q, 19860
Page Twenty -Seven
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT STUART'S FIRST ADDITION
B. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 9.5 Acres and
Containing 144 Apartment Units Entitled Stuart's First Addition --
A public hearing was held before, the Advisory Planning Commission
at their January 2'8., 1986 meeting, to consider a preliminary plat
application submitted by Stuart Nolan for a 9.5 acre,, 144 apartment
unit project. This project is, to be located in Outlots A and
B, Tomark 2nd Addition. The Advisory Planning. Commission is recom-
mending approval of the preliminary plat subject to the conditions
in the staff report and with a modification to condition #11 that
allows for the prepayment of -special assessments. The prepayment
• of special assessments will not be—required as long as it was
a one -owner project vs. a condominium split between a number of
owners. Prior to being condominiums or selling this assessment
would be paid, is the language desired by the Commission. For
additional information on this item refer to the Planning and
Engineering Department report found on pages q0through
The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending that
1) A cash dedication requirement be satisfied and 2) That a
bituminous trailway be allowed on Lexington Avenue. For a copy
of the APC minutes -refer to pages through �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat for Stuart's First Addition as presented.
1]
in
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT -
APPLICANT: STUART'S FIRST ADD (Stuart Nolan)
LOCATION: TOMARK 2ND ADD, NW'%, SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: R-4 (MULTIPLE) =
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 15, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for preliminary
plat approval for the Stuart's First Addition. The plat consists
of 144 apartment units on 9.5 acres (2 outlots), east of Lexington
AV & west of Carriage Hills Golf Course,
ZONING & LAND USE: The site is zoned R-4 multiple and is surround-
ed by the same zoning on all sides except for an agricultural
lot along the SW property line. The Comprehensive Guide Plan
designated this area as R -III, density 6 - 12 units per acre.
Golfview Rd will be continued to the west and meet Lexington
AV directly across from Town Centre 100 Rd. The applicant has
an option on the- land north of this road extension. This area
contains a ponding area and is quite low in relation to the existing
Lexington AV, which is scheduled for improvements in 1988. The
subject area is rolling grassland and has little or no mature
,,:vegetation. ,
SITE PLANNING: There are two (2) buildings proposed, each contain -
in
_g
ontain-ing 72 units and underground parking. One additional 10' parking .
stal-l.has been provided outside thus meeting Code requirements _
in terms of size and numbers. These buildings will be connected `
by a covered walkway to a centrally located recreation building.''
This building will contain .a sauna,- whirlpool, spa, excercise
room and possibly an indoor pool. A tot lot will be provided
,.near the recreation building. O'Leary Park, acrossLexington
AV, will contain tennis courts when the parks development takes
place. .
-A secondary loop service drive will connect the parking 'areas
-and provide emergency access to the recreation building area.
This .drive will have knock -down bollards at the parking lot point..
The buildings and parking areas meet or exceed all City setback
and coverage requirements.
1
V
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 2
JANUARY 28, 1986
COMMENTS: The tentative project name will be%Carriage Crossings'.
These apartments will be made of 100% brick with redwood gables.
This style should be quite compatible to the surrounding area.
The apartments will be marketed as a higher income rental project.
Extra amenities include: fireplaces in some units, larger more
usable balconies and easy access laundry facilities in addition
to the enclosed recreation building features. The interior con-
struction will include staggard stud walls and gyperete to help
eliminate typical apartment noise as much as possible. Tentative
rent prices will be approx. $575, $675 and $775 for 1, 2 and
.3 bedroom units respectively.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading plan that the applicant submitted
is feasibleand within City Codes. Although the grading operations
will disturb almost the entire site, there is no substantial
vegetation or trees that the grading will affect. Staff recommends •
the applicant review his grading plan in the area between the
tot lot and rec building to provide better positive drainage
to the north. As it is now, water will stand in this area.
Also, the grading done on this development shall not adversly
impact the existing from the County's culvert under Lexington
Av and the private culvert under an existing dirt road at the
SW corner of this proposed development. The County will probably
replace the existing culvert with the upgrading of Lexington
Av in 1988. The grading plan, as proposed, shows filling of .
up to 8' over existing sanitary sewer line along the easterly
portion of .this proposed development. The existing cover is
about 10' presently, making the total proposed fill over the
pipe about 18'. While this depth approaches the maximum fill
height over the PVC sanitary sewer pipe, staff does not feel
this should pose any problems because the depth is still within
the allowable limits for backfilling over PVC pipe.
Prior to the gradingoperations and until the completion 'U f the •
restoration over this site, this development shall install adequate
'•erosion control measures to prevent the depositing of sediment
within existing City storm sewer lines in Golfview Dr or within
r,,the existing low area in the SE corner of this proposed development.'.
This development is located within drainage 'district "D -The
existing and future runoff will be toward the north and eventually
into pond DP -10. Project 443 (O'Neil pond) will provide the
gravity outlet from pond DP -10 downstream through DP -5 and DP -4. `
The downstream system from DP -4 is currently in place all the
way to the Minnesota River Valley. As a result, this development `
will not require any trunk storm sewer construction to accommodate.
its runoff. -
or' y
C �
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 3
JANUARY 28, 1986
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and water main of sufficient size,
capacity and depth are in place adjacent to this property to
provide service to it.
The sanitary sewer may be extended from the end of the existing
Golfview Dr westerly within Golfview Dr. The applicant can also
extend the existing 8" water main within Golfview Dr westerly
and connect into the existing 18" water main on the west side -
of Lexington AV to complete the watermain loop within this area.
At the writing of this report, it is the developer's intention
to proceed with the installation of public utilities and streets
under a private contract. The developer must submit plans and
specs prepared in accordance with City standards for review and
approval prior to final plat approval.
i STREETS: Lexington AV (Co. Rd. 43) abuts this development along
the west and Golf view Dr is stubbed to the NEcorner of this proposed
development. Dakota County Hwy Dept maintains jurisdiction over
Lexington AV, which is presently a two lane rural section roadway.
Dakota County proposes on improving Lexington AV to a 52' wide
minor arterial collector street in 1988. Golfview Dr is an existing
residential City street.
This development proposes to extend Golfview Dr westerly to Lexing-
ton Av. This intersection will be directly across from Town
Centre 100 Dr.
TRAILWAYS: Because of the designation of Lexington AV as a minor
arterial roadway, City policy will require a trailway along ,both
sides of Lexington Av. The trailway portion adjacent the westerly
border of this property will be the responsibility of this develop-
ment. . Because the actual installation of this trailway will
not be until 1988, staff recommends this development prepay for
the trailway installation as referenced under the assessment
paragraph.
PERMITS: This development will be -responsible for obtaining
the following permits prior to final plat approval:
1) MPC sewer extension permit
2) Mn Dept -of Health water main extension permit
3) Dakota County Hwy .access .and work within County right-of-way
permit
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: Staff recommends this development dedicate
the full 60' right-of-way for the Golfview Dr extension on the
final plat.
The previously platted Tomark Add provided for a 55' half right-of-
way for Lexington Av. This width should be sufficient for the .
-.upgrading of Lexington AV to 52' in the future. However, because .
v
STUART'S FIRST ADD
PAGE 4
JANUARY 28, 1986
of the potential grading required to rebuild Lexington AV, staff
recommends this development provide a 20' slope easement adjacent
the westerly boundary of this proposed development.
Staff will require increasing the easement over the existing
sanitary sewer to 30' centered over the sewer line because of
the additional fill proposed by this development. Because the
easterly parking lot for building #2 will be encroaching the
sanitary sewer easement, staff recommends that the applicant
enter into an agreeement with the City whereby the applicant
will agree to pay for any parking lot and trailway restoration
necessary if the City has to repair the sanitary sewer line in
the future.
ASSESSMENTS: The City assessment records indicate that for outlots
A & B of the Tomark 2nd Add, all trunk area related assessments
for water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer are either levied
or pending with the exception of lateral benefit from trunk water
main. This development will be responsible for the lateral benefit
from trunk water main as illustrated in figure #2 along its westerly
boundary at the rate in effect of final platting. In addition,
staff recommends this development prepay its multi -family rate
for Lexington AV future improvements along with the future trailway
improvements. The following table summarizes the assessment
responsibilities for this development.
Assessment Summary
Est'd 1986
Description Quantity Rate Amount
Lateral Benefit from 480 f.f. $11.88 : $5,702
Trunk Watermain
Lexington AV 480 f.f. $63.36 $30,413
Trailway 480 f.f. $11.81 $ 5,669
Total $41,784
All costs associated with the installation of the public improve-
ments will be the sole responsibility of this development.
.CONDITIONS:
1) The garage shall be included in the rental unit price if
only 2 stalls per unit are provided with this project.
2) Shall be subject to Park Commission's review and comment `:.
regarding park dedication. .
3):. A detailed landscaping plan shall be submitted and a bond
not to be released until 1 year after landscaping is completed.
4)_ Golfview Dr shall be extended out to Lexington Av.
I
STUART'S
FIRST ADD
PAGE
5
JANUARY
28, 1986
5)
This development shall not adversly impact any existing drainage
patterns with its site grading.
6)
This development shall loop the existing 8" watermain within
Golfview Dr to Lexington Av.
7)
This development shall be responsible for obtaining the -neces-
sary permits from MPCA, MN Dept of Health & Dakota County
Hwy Dept.
8)
This development 'shall grant the City a 20' slope easement
adjacent Lexington AV right-of-way.
9)
This development shall dedicate a 30' easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and enter into an agreement to pay for
restoration of parking lot or trailway where either encroaches
•
upon the City's easement.
10)
This development shall dedicate a full 60' right-of-way (outlot
C) for street purposes.
11)
This development shall be responsible for lateral benefit
from trunk water main and prepayment of its multi -family
equivalent for Lexington AV upgrading and also for the trailway
construction.
12)
All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
ae S'
LEGEND
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
6940
T 2
-4.4
Q'
M
DP -2.
I Q
";
740
'I
%P
.87
� .87
SCP -5
-8730
.875.9
8680
872.3
T-6 \�EP -
829
856
b
JP-;
832
854
Ek- —
U.
JF
9.
5 j
8740
9882F
0
0.1
................
................
................
................
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG.
City of eagan approved: standard
STORM SEWER plate #:
PUBLIC
WORKS
DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
f. A 15 foot easemnt over o and 16, Block 2 and Lots 21 and
22, Block 1, fo orm sewer.
g. A 15 foot easeme t ocated ac s the common lot lines of Lots 1,
2, and 29 of Bloc 2 rm ewer.
9. This development shall be responsible for the installation of a 5 foot
concrete walk along Wescott Road.
All voted aye, except Mulrooney and Voracek who voted nay, stating that'PD
zoning should not be used s rictly to accoormo ate reduced lot sizes for single
family lots and that less a 11 a amily lots are not necessarily a
better use than other types of R-2 s s.
STUART'S S AD T - P LIMINARY PLAT
• Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for 144 apartment
units on approximately 9.5 acres, Outlots A and B, Tomark 2na Addition, in
part of the northwest quarter of Section 14, south of Yankee Doodle Road and
east of Lexington Avenue. Dale Runkle described the proposal as the
completion of two of the toutlots remaining in Tomark 2na Addition. Mr.
Stuart Nolan was present an subm' ea a written and oral request that he not
be required to prepay assessor for racing of Lexington Avenue and the
trail system, as the projec wo a mpass one owner, rather than the
multiple owners as in a conn mi ium a ion. He then described the
development as an up -scale apar m roje ith brick exterior, oak woodwork
comparable or better than t oocs Apartments on Shepard Road. Several -
condominium owners from Ca ri ills Condominiums appeared objecting on the -.
basis that they were having ifficulty with the developer of their complex in
gaining control of the Condominium Association. Apparently, the District
Court had recently ruled against them in regard to control of their
.:association based upon the developer's ability to bring the three additional
outlots into the aevelopmenar that Mr. Nolan was the owner
or owned the option to th three remainin lots and thus, the condominium
owners were advised to pursue ERU ma aM er with their own legal counsel.
-
Mulrooney moved, Bohne seconded th moIrntal
n to recommend approval of the
.preliminary plat, subject to the fo 10 ing aitions.
1. The garage shall be included in the unit price if only 2 stalls ....,
...per unit are provided with this project.
2,. Shall be subject to Park Commission's review and comment regarding
3. A detailed landscaping plan shall b submitted and a bond not to be
released not less than one ing is completed.
4. Golfview Drive shall be extended out o Lexington Avenue.
5. This development shall not adv rs ly impact any existing drainage
'patterns with its site grading.
d
0 .
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986 _
6. This development a o0p a isting 8 inch watermain within
Golfview Drive to Lexington
7. This development sal be res ns ble for obtaining the necessary
permits from MPCA, MN Depart m t o th d Dakota County Highway Dept.
8: This development shall grant the City a 20 foot slope easement
adjacent to Lexington Avenue right-of-way.
9. This development shall dedicate a 30 foot easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and Pnter into an ag eement to pay for restoration of
parking lot or trailway wher h s upon the City's easement.
10. This development shall eaica a full 60 foot right-of-way
(Outlot C) for street purposes._
11. This development sh re on le for lateral benefit from trunk •
water main and prepayment of its multi -family equivalent for Lexington Avenue
upgrading and also for the trailway construction.
12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
Ail voted in favor and std �asdirected to resolve any discrepancies
regarding condition No. 11 be tmeeting.
ADVENT UNITED METHODIS H - IMINARY PLAT 3 REZONING
Chairperson McCrea next co ea the public hearing for preliminary plat
for a church on approximately 5 acres and rezoning from R-2 and Agricultural
to PF (Public Facilities) located in part of the northeast quarter of Section
22, south of Westbury Drive and west of Lexington Ave. City Planner Runkle -..,
presented the application. Linda Mitchem from Be Architects, Inc. was present '
on behalf of the develo centered around the need for:!,,,.
landscaping buffer for ad3a nt residential a eas, the expansion of future
parking and the method for carrying away storm water run-off. Bohne moved,
-.".Wilkins seconded the motion to reco e a apr val of the rezoning from R-2 and
:-.Agricultural to PF (Public Faciliti s) Al oted in favor.-
Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded t e mo i n to recommend approval of the
,;preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The parking lot shall be completed to City standards as soon as the
overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
2. A detailed landscape plan and fin®n ial guarantee shall be submitted
and not released until wing season, whichever is later,
after the completion. The anascape plan sha L be submitted on an approved
grading plan at the time of Mai hall include plans for plantings
..___.on the north and south property lines. ._— a
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
?age Twenty -Eight.
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND REZONING/UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
C. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 5 Acres and
Containing One Lot and a Rezoning from PD to PF for Advent United
Methodist Church --A public hearing was held before the Advisory
Planning Commission at their January 28, 1986 meeting to consider
two (2) applications that were submitted by Advent Methodist Church
consisting of a rezoning from Planned Development to Public
Facilities and preliminary plat. The APC is recommending approval
of the preliminary plat and rezoning subject to the staff report
noting- that trees be planted on the north and south property lines
® and along Lexington Avenue. For additional information on this
item refer to the Planning and Enginee ing report, a copy is
enclosed on pages /D / through /OFor a copy of the
Parks and Recreation recommendation refer to page /O 9 For
a copy of the action that was taken by the APC refe to those
minutes found on page (s)//,Q4/// .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To approve or deny
the rezoning from PD to PF. 2) To approve or deny the preliminary
plat for Advent United Methodist Church.
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
NE4, SECTION 22
R-2 & AGRICULTURAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 17, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
• APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted by
Advent Methodist Church requesting a rezoning of R-2 and agricultur-
al districts to a single public facilities district south of
the Westbury Addition along Lexington Av.
ZONING & LAND USE: This site abuts the Westbury Addition to
the north and west, an agricultural parcel of approx. 5 acres
and Patrick Eagan Park, to the south. The Lexington Square develop-
ment is across Lexington Av. The Comprehensive Guide Plan design-
ates this area as R-1, single family, 0 - 3 units per acre.
The topography is quite flat with the highest areas being at
the 890 elevation and the lowest at 884. Off site to the south
and west the land drops off rather quickly towards the park.
The vegetation consists primarily of scrub grasses over a sandy
loam soil.
• CODE COMPLIANCE: , The proposed church building and parking area
will be constructed in a phased approach. The first phase will
consist of the main worship area (7,500 S.F.) and parking for
92 cars at 10' spacing. City Code requires 1 space for each
3.5 seats based on capacity design. 300 seats will be provided
thus requiring 85 spaces. The northern one-half of the parking
lot will be constructed with the initial development and the
remaining area will be graveled for overflow parking.
The building setback along Lexington AV is 70' and the parking
setback is 30', both within .the code requirements of 50' and
20' respectively. .-Ample' areas to the north and west have been
alloted for _future expansion. There will be no problem accomodating
setbacks and lot -coverage standards.
COMMENTS: Access to the church will be from a single 24' drive
from Lexington Av. The site distance appears good at this location.
A 12' wide -drop off area is provided on the northern most area
of this entry drive. A canopy will cover this area in a later
phase of development.
/O /
a
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
The building will be a single story and consist of either cedar
or redwood. A wood frame struction will most likely be the con-
struction style, however, the architect wishes to use some brick
if the funds become available. Asphalt shingles will also be
used. At this point, no steeple is foreseen and the height will
not appear out of scale with the surrounding areas. Staff has
not seen building elevations as of yet.
A preliminary landscape plan has been provided and it illustrates
screening of the parking area from Lexington AV through the use
of plant material and an earth berm.
TOPOGRAPHY/DRAINAGE: This development is located west of Lexington
AV and south and east of—the Westbury Additions. The existing
topography is relatively flat farmland draining in a westerly •
direction. This proposed development is located within drainage
district "J", as depicted in Figure ;1. Drainage from this proposed
development is to be directed into trunk storm sewer which eventual-
ly outlets into pond JP -9 (McCarthy Lake).
There are two alternatives available for the parking lot drainage.
First, the parking lot could drain to the east towards Lexington
AV where storm water would be collected in catch basins constructed
by this development and outlets into the ditch along Lexington
Av. This would require County approval. The second alternative
would be to drain the parking lot to the west in its natural
drainage pattern through Patrick Eagan Park to pond JP -9. This
would require the approval of the Eagan Park Commission.
UTILITIES: An 18" trunk watermain was installed under project
395-I and is located 20' west of the centerline of Lexington
AV, which will sufficiently service this project.
As part of the Westbury Addition, an 8" sanitary sewer lateral
was constructed and a manhole placed at the north property line
of this proposed development to adequately service this site.
It would be the responsibility of this development to extend
the saidsanitarylateral from its north property line to its
south property line for future service to parcel 010-02, located
directly south.
STREETS/TRAILWAYS: Lexington AV borders this proposed development
on the east. This road is a County road and is presently planned
to be upgraded from a two lane rural section to a four lane urban
section in 1988. County approval will be required for the entrance
location onto Lexington AV.
It will be the responsibility of this developmentto construct
an 8' bituminous trailway adjacent to Lexington Av.
/D y
0
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: A 55' half right-of-way will be required
to be dedicated for Lexington Av. In addition to all regular
10' utility easements adjacent to public right-of-way and 5'
drainage and utility easements adjacent to all lot lines, a utility
easement will be required for the sanitary lateral to be extended
from the north to south property lines of this proposed development.
In addition, a ponding and utility easement will be required
if the parking area is to be drained to pond JP -9. A 10' trailway
easement shall be provided adjacent to Lexington Av.
ASSESSMENTS: Research into the assessments regarding this site
indicate the site is still responsible for the upgrading of trunk
area storm sewer and trunk area watermain from agricultural to
commercial rates. These are summarized on the following table:
Estimated 1986 Amount
Description Quantity Date
Trunk Area Water Upgrading 3.73 (ac)(1) $1,830(2) $6,825
Trunk Area Storm Sewer
Upgrading
Total
162,564 S.F.(1)
$0.025(3) $4,065
$10,890
(1) Net Area
(2) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($3,020 - 1,190)
(3) Difference between agricultural & commercial rates ($0.075 - 0.050)
CONDITIONS:
1) The canopy area will require a Conditional Use Permit.
2) ' The parking lot shall be completed to City ' standards as
soon as the overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
3) A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submit-
ted and not released until 1 year after completion. The
landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading
plan -at the time of final plat.
3). A detailed grading and erosion control plan be' submitted
for approval by staff.
4) This development shall be responsible for an 8' bituminous
"trailway along Lexington Av.
5) Right-of-way shall be dedicated as referenced in the engineering
report.
6) All utility &drainage easements shall be dedicated as referenc-
ed in the engineering report.
Al 3
ADVENT METHODIST CHURCH
REZONING & PREL PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 4
CONDITIONS (continued)
7) The costs of all sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer shall
be the sole responsibility of this development.
8) County approval must be obtained for the entrance to Lexington
Av prior to final plat approval.
9) County approval or Park Commission approval must be obtained
for the parking lot drainage prior to final plat approval.
10) Minimum setbacks & parking requirements shall be met prior to
building permit issuance.-
11)
ssuance-11) This development shall assume the additional assessments
as defined in the staff report based on rates in effect at
the time of final plat approval.
12) This development shall be responsible to extend the sanitary
sewer to the south boundary for future development.
13) All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
0
LOCATION PIAN
approximate scale t° - 400'
/--f/
�-- R-2
zoNiNC��
Aej. ZONING /
PARK , p
PA-[F,IcK EAGArt �-
PAP-K
no,
PSK
EXISTING ZONING CP SITE IS R-2 AG
PROPOSED REZONING TO PF - PUBLIC FACILITY
ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
be architects, Inc.
lake elmo, minnesota
5
pt
ri
rzcL arxs cAxa:y � I I .
X637.0eaa aao eoz r/I
PRELI".,�NARY GRADING, DRAINAGE, oo'
AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN id SCALE so' I I2
ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH be architects, Inc.
EAGAN, MINNESOTA lake elmo, minnesota
CITY
MALL
�! JP -41 L5. -
t4 665.3.._ �ry�•
687.0
JP -31 -+
676.3 +
890.4
I- Z
41==J4 -
J P -20C
852.0
8356
JP
81
64
r�
r_•
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. *1
city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate #d
0PUBLIC
WORKS
- MASTER PLAN -
DEPARTMEN
I
0
L
SUBJECT PARCEL
/6 gr FIG. #2
city of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved: standard
EDPUBLIC plate #:
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
y
MEMO TO �AONORABLE.MAYOR'&;CITY COUNCILM_EMBERS
TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR.
L1 FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1986
RE: ADVISORY PARKS & REC COMM ACTION - ADVENT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
At the February 6th meeting of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission, the
Commission reviewed the preliminary plat for Advent United Methodist Church.
In reviewing the plat, the Advisory Commission expressed some concern over the
proposed drainage flow from the parking lot through Patrick Eagan Park.
Concern is for overland drainage which would cause erosion within steep sloped
areas further to the west. It was noted that staff was to meet with the
representatives of the church to"review possible alternatives.
• The Advisory Commission recommended the following:
1) That this development be responsible for costs associated with a
bituminous trailway on Lexington Avenue through the length of its plat.
2) That the cash dedication requirement be waived until such time that this
property is converted into any other use.
KV/js
CC: Julie Dykstra, Planning -Aide
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
6. This developmenta oop isting 8 inch watermain within
Golfview Drive to Lexington
7. This development s;
al be res ns ble for obtaining the necessary
permits from MPGA, MN Departm t o th d Dakota County Highway Dept.
8. This development shall grant the City a 20 foot slope easement -'
adjacent to Lexington Avenue right-of-way.
9. This development shall dedicate a 30 foot easement over the existing
sanitary sewer line and pnter into an ag eement to pay for restoration of
parking lot or trailway wher h s upon the City's easement.
10. This development shall�re
edica a full 60 foot right-of-way
(Outlot C) for street purposes.
11. This development sh on ' le for lateral benefit from trunk •
water main and prepayment of its multi -family equivalent for Lexington Avenue
upgrading ana also for the trailway construction.
12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
All voted in favor and sta as directed to resolve any discrepancies
regarding condition No. 11 be the cit meeting.
ADVENT UNITED METHODIS H - IMINARY PLAT 6 REZONING
Chairperson McCrea next co ea the public hearing for preliminary plat
for a church on approximately 5 acres and rezoning from R-2 and Agricultural
to PF (Public Facilities) located in part of the northeast quarter of Section
22, south of Westbury Drive and west of Lexington Ave. City Planner Runkle
presented the application. Linda Mitchem from Be Architects, Inc. was present -
on behalf of the aevelo centered around the need for
landscaping buffer for adJa nt residential a eas, the expansion of future -
parking and the method for carrying away s orm water run-off. Bohne moved,
Wilkins seconded the motion toe d ap r val of the rezoning from R-2 and
..-.-Agricultural .to PF (Public Faciliti s) Al oted in favor. ...
- Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded t e mo i n to recommend approval of the
preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions:
1. The parking lot shall be completed to City standards as soon as the
overflow area is being used on a regular basis.
.2. A detailed landscape plan and fin®n ial guarantee shall be submitted
and not released until-orwing season, whichever is later,
after the completion. The ands cape plan sha 1 be submitted on an approved
grading plan at the time of Fina p a an hall include plans for plantings
,_._.on the north and south property lines. ❑ _ -
•
E
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
3. A detailed grading Lan erosion n rol
approval by staff.
4. This development ha be re po ible
trailway along Lexington Ave.
plan shall be submitted for
for an 8 foot bituminous
5. Right-of-way shall be dedicated as referenced in the engineering
report.
6. All utility and drainage easements shall
the engineering report.
7. The costs of all sanitary s wer, w ter
sole responsibility of this develop t.
8. County approval must be ob in fo the
prior to final plat approva
be dedicated as referenced in
and storm sewer shall be the
entrance to Lexington Avenue
9. County approval or Park Commission approval must be obtained for the
parking lot drainage prior to final plat approval.
10. Minimum setbacks parking requirements shall be met prior to
building permit issuance.
11. This development shall sim¢�51ie additional assessments as defined
in the staff report based rates effect at the time of final plat
approval.
12. This development s al responsible to extend the sanitary sewer to
the south boundary for Tutu a development.
13. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to.
All voted in favor.
BUR OAR HILL PREDNARY PLAT
The public hearing for Bur Oak
sprminary plat was next convened by
Chairperson McCrea, consisting of a requ for preliminary plat for 216
single family lots on approximately ill acres located in part of the southeast
quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway
455. City Planner Runkle presented the proposal with its history under an
existing planned development agreement, which included a preliminary plat with
duplex units and some commercial area. Rere entatives from Harstad Companies
and First National Bank of St. Paul er present to answer questions.
Discussion centered around t a amount of park land and change
.in access thereto, as compa ed to the origina plat proposed under the planned
development agreement. It was recommende that the developer work with the
Park Department for access to the park and th t the Cul-de-sacs be adjusted
slightly to prevent unnecessary steep cuql_j to the rolling topography. Mr.
Mike McAllistrum representing First National Bank, pointed out to the Planning
Commission that as owner of the property, First National Bank would not down-
L
Agenda Information
February 18, 1986,
Pace Twenty -Nine
Memo
City Council Meeting
PRELIMINARY PLAT,.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND PYLON SIGN
K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
D. Preliminary Plat Consisting of Approximately 2..1 Acres and
Containing 1 Strip Commercial Facility With 18,620 Square Foot
Strip Retail Center, Conditional Use Permit and a Pylon Sign --
A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission
at their January 28, 1986 meeting to consider applications submitted
by K Charles Corporation for a retail strip center, conditional
use permit for a drive-through restaurant facility and a pylon
sign. The Advisory Planning—Commission is recommending approval
of the preliminary plat and conditional use permits. For additional
information on this item refer to the ,Planning and Engineering
Department report, copies enclosed on pages //3 through &0
for your review. The APC is recommending that a cash dedication
requirement be allowed consistant with the City's commercial/
industrial policy. For action that was taken by the APC refer
to a copy of those minutes found on pages AV through /aa .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
preliminary plat, conditional use permit and pylon sign for the
K Charles Addition as presented.
112-
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: K. CHARLES DEVELOPMENT CORP
LOCATION: NWi, SECTION 15
EXISTING ZONING: CSC (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 16, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: Two separate applications ?.ave been submit-
ted by the K. Charles Development Corporat'.on. The first being
a preliminary plat for a 17,620 so,, ft. retail strip center along
the southern side of Duckwood Dr and east of Krestwood La. The
other is a conditional use for a pylon sign and drive-thru for
a restaurant on the eastern portion of the building.
ZONING & LAND USE: This site is surrounded
shopping center) zoning on the north and east,
the proposed Hardee's Restaurant. It will be
the access points to Hardees and the subject
.from each other. The area to the south is
• business, just east of the First B-ank Eagan.
with little or no vegetation at this time.
by CSC (community
To the west is
important that
site meet across
designated limited
The land is flat
SITEPLANNING & CODE COMPLIANCE: This plat will consist of the .
retail area ± 2.1 acres and an outlot of nearly 1 acre to the
south. Two entry/exit points are provided, .one along Krestwood
La and the other on Duckwood Dr. Both are large enough for east
vehicular movement and -have good site lines. Most of the parking
will be on the northern one-half of the site. A one way loop
road along the southern portion of the site will provide parking
for 29 cars and stacking for the fast food menu board and pick
up area. City Code requires one parking stall per 150 sq. ft.
.in retail areas. This 12,620 sq, ft, center will require 84
stalls. The fast. food restaurant, a food fair type that will
include the Golden Skillet and a Dairy Queen, will not have a
separate parking area but use available stalls from the 109 that
are provided. The parking stalls are shown_ to be 10' wide and
both building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements.
.Staff has recommended that an easement between the retail area
and the out -lot be created. to allow movement between the parcels '
;,,.without going on Krestwood first. Also, that only one -access
be allowed onto Krestwood from the outlot,
iii
K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT & COND USE PERMIT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
The interior lighted pylon sign will be located west of the Duckwood
Dr entrance and must be placed 10' within the property line from
the widest portion of the signage area. This sign area --will ,
be approx. 90 sq, ft per.side and the height will be 20'.
COMMENTS: The building's exterior will be brown iron spotted
brick over concrete block with a concrete walkway in front.
Store front accents will be achieved through the use of anodized
aluminum - the color has yet to be determined. A rock faced
coping will continue around the entire building above the sign
band area. The signage will typically be ± 24". The back side
of the building will be 8" single score painted concrete block..,
The gabled entry to the Food Fare area will be sky lighted...
and serve as a major focal point. A tot lot will be provided
adjacent to the northern portion of -the restaurant and will require •
some form of safety barrier from the parking/road areas. A separate
trash area has not been shown, therefore, it is assumed that
all debris will be contained within the building.
GRADING/DRAINAGE: Because this site is rather flat, the grading
the applicant is proposing is certainly feasible. The final
grading plan the applicant submits for final plat approval shall
contain adequate erosion control methods in accordance with the
City's Erosion Control Manual.
This site lies within major drainage district D as shown in Figure
1. All downstream trunk storm sewer facilities within this district
are in place. No trunk storm sewer facilities are necessary
as a result of this development.
However, this development will- be responsible for extending
the existing ,storm ,sewer outlet from Krestwood La to their ea
s
property line.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer and watermain of .sufficient size,
capacity and depth exist within Krestwood La and Duckwood Dr.
;This development will not require any.utilities extensions..
STREETS: buckwood Dr borders this --proposed development on .the
north and Krestwood La borders on the west. Both streets are
City streets. Duckwood Dr is classified as -a community collector -
street and was constructed to City standards in 1985 under project
429. Krestwood La is classified as a local street also .Built
to City standards..
The northerly access to this development from Duckwood Dr lines
up with Town Centre Dr 70 to form a four-way intersection. _. The
westerly access from Krestwood La is far ,enough away from the
Duckwood Dr. intersection to provide safe ingress and egress.'
However, staff recommends the Commission stay flexible and require .,.,.;
-this development to work with the proposed Hardee's, across the
:,•street, to. line up their respective entrances onto Krestwood
La Finally,. staff recommends that the Commission allow only
S K CHARLES DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT a COND USE PERMIT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
•,
one access to the proposed outlot because it wil not be wide
enough to support two accesses. Staff recommends this development
provide for a cross easement so that both the proposed outlot
and this development can share the westerly access.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall dedicate a 40
foot half right-of-way for Duckwood Dr and a 30 foot half right-of-
way for Krestwood La.
This development shall also dedicate a 30 foot utility easement
for the storm sewer extension.
ASSESSMENTS: This development will be responsible for trunk
area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time
of final platting.
CONDITIONS:
1) This development shall be responsible for extending the existing
storm sewer from Krestwood La to its east line.
2) This development shall be responsible for working with the
development across the street to line up their respective
accesses onto Krstwood La.
3) Only one access shall be allowed onto Krestwood La for the
outlot.
4) Cross easements shall be provided by the applicant so that
both the developed lot and future outlot can share one access
onto Krestwood La.
5) This development shall dedicate 40' & 30" half right-of-ways
- for Duckwood Dr & Krestwood Ln respectively.
6) This development shall be responsible for trunk storm sewer .
area assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final
platting. .
7) The- pylon sign be located 10' within the property line .and
subject to the one time sign ordinance fee of $2.50/sq. ft.
8) A detailed landscape plan on the proposed grading plan be
submitted demonstrating suitable screening and berming of
the parking areas. -
9) An easement be created between lot 1 and the outlot to provide
road access between the two parcels at. the time the outlot
is developed.
elseE�AN CONVENIENCE CENTER
w iu =
FY A�e"Y tes EAGAN MINNESOTA
EW14 CONVENIENCE CENTER
EAGAN IUINNFSl1TA
0� M/
.
FvodFare
t
y..
r
bt
L�7�uYur lW
.
I
..
-
0
-
-
rro.io mv..o
.v
PAM IM
'
r
.+i�L.!-La��.'.:L��1p<.1.►i.•µ,�6�f��il�1LY�M:
Vi4i��-PZ%�.\-�L�. �.•µ'-W�Ia .W./1��f
NPYLON SIGN ELEVATION
NO SCALE
EW14 CONVENIENCE CENTER
EAGAN IUINNFSl1TA
0
•
�P..L. ?
; HNSvW
69c,
CP -6
715.0
7/9.7 -
[r. rE.;Ni
i�
r
................
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG. *1 1
city Of eagan 1J approved: standard
PUBLICSTORM SEWER. plate #.:
WORKS 0
DEPARTMEry MASTER PLAN
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
1
11. If public improvements r o e ins alley unser City contract, the
appropriate improvements shall ordered for tallation by Council action
prior to final plat approval.
12. The developer shall comp wt st et revisions presented by the
Commission on January 28, 1986, inc n shortening of the cul-de-sac on
the east side of the park property, (b) deleting the eyebrow on the originally
proposed street conception, (c) deleting the small cul-de-sac in the
southeasterly portion of the plat, (d) extending the street in the
northeasterly corner of the plat, and (e) providing a through -street in the
northwest corner of the plat.
13. The developer shall comply w t the ocess found necessary by the
City of Eagan to properly rezone the pr rty t -1.
All voted in favor.
K. CHARLES DEVELOPMENT CORP. - PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing regarding the
preliminary plat request and citional use permit for a 17,620 square foot
retail strip center with and in luai a 6,000 square foot drive-through
restaurant and pylon sign located " art he northwest quarter of Section
15, south of Duckwood Drive and east tw Lane. Dale Runkle explained
that the proposal met the City requi a ents. ob Venny, architect for the
project, was present to answer q e ns. equest for nine foot parking
spaces for employees at the r o e building was requested. A
representative of Krestwood nd niums exp ressea concern about hours,
lighting and traffic. It was po nted out that the pylon sign must comply with
code in relation to the previously permitted Hardees pylon sign. Trygg moved,
.-Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and
conditional use permit for a pylon sign,and drive-through facility, subject to..
,-,,,,the following conditions
1. This development shall be responsiDle extending the existing storm
sewer from Krestwood Lane to its east lin
.2. This development shall be respon i le f r orking with the development
across the street to line up their respective a ce sea onto Krestwood Lane.
3. Only one access shall be allowed onto Krestwood Lane for the outlot.
4. Cross easements shall be provided by the applicant so that both the
- developed lot and future outlot can share one a ce s onto Krestwooa Lane.
5. This development shall d 30 foot half right-of-ways
.for Duckwood Drive and Krestwood Lane respectively.
...._. 6. This development shall be
assessments at the rates in effect at
responsib a for trunk storm
the time tLyinal platting.
sewer area -._
•
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
7. The pylon sign shalb oca a eet within the property line and
subject to the one time sig ainance fee 2.50 per square foot.
8. A detailed lanasca a Ian on h proposed grading plan shall be
submitted demonstrating suita e s ng d berming of the parking areas.
9. An easement shall be created between Lot 1 and the Outlot to provide
road access between the two parcels at the time the outlot is developed.
10. Only one access shall be allowed from Krestwood Lane into the outlot.
All voted in favor.
ECONOMICS LABO OUIN WAIVER OF PLAT
City Planner Runkle aavi tcant had requested a continuance
of this matter. All members voted in favor of a continuance.
AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then comme the public hearing for conditional use
'permit for two above -ground !!'7n�dstom tanks on 2.3 acres on Lot 5 of the
Robert O'Neil homestead, locate p he southeast quarter of Section
2, north of Trunk Highway _ #55 no D oad. A representative of the
applicant was present and wit d the uest for a conditional use permit
for a 14 ft. by 14 ft. by 2 hi iesel tank, and is requesting only -
consideration for a 14 ft. 7 t. CO2 tank. Mr. Mark Parranto was present
on behalf of RES Partne ship to object as being located too close to the
proposed office building sites. It was suggested that the tank might be
considered a heavy industrial use. Mulrooney moved, Trygg seconded the motion
• to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for CO2 tank. Four voted :.
,;.against and three voted in
EAGAN CENTUITE L REVIEW
Mr. Jim Curry was present to v ew h Eagan Center Site Plan review,
which now included a self-service gas stat with grocery store and separate
service bays on the west end of. the proposed commercial site. Bohne
recommended approval of the site plan and subject to (1) City Ordinance, (2)
staff conditions, and (3) compliance with Uniform Building Code and any other
state building or fire codes. Trygg secondeed the motion and all voted in
favor.
ZONING AMENDMEN- PUD RENEWAL, E TENSION a TERMINATION,
Because of the late hour, this item wantinued.
L
Agenda Information
February 18: 1986,
Page Thirty
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/ATRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES
E. Conditional Use Permit for Above Ground Liquid Storage Tanks --
A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission
at their last regular meeting held on January 28, 1986, to consider
an application for a conditional use permit to allow two (2) above
ground liquid storage tanks on Lot 5 of the Imre Addition, west
of T.H. 149 and north of T.H. 55. The APC is recommending denial
of the conditional use permit for outside storage. For additional
consideration on this matter refer to the City staff report, a
copy is enclosed on pages_ through /2� For a copy
of the APC minutes refer to page_
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To app—rove or deny the
conditional use permit for the above -ground liquid storage tanks
as requested by Airco Industrial Gases.
/23
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINSTRATOR HEDGES
CITY PLANNER RUNKLE
FROM: JIM STURM, PLANNER I
FEBRUARY 13, 1986
SUBJECT: AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASSES - CONDITIONAL USE
On the Janury 28, 1986, APC meeting, Airco Industrial Gasses
withdrew its application for diesel tank storage. The request for
storage of CO (carbon dioxide) in 14' x 14' x 17' tanks was
denied in a 4-1 vote.
Since then the applicant has submitted an alternative to City
staff. The proposed COtanks will now measure approximately 8'
• (width) x 56' (length) x29' (height)._ As a reference, these tanks
will be smaller than those of a semi -truck trailer and will be
painted white.
Airco has provided staff with brochures detailing their business
operation, and these are available for your review upon request.
Representatives from Airco will be present to provide pictures of
the site and to answer additional questions.
Planner I
JS/jj
•
/a /
Section Slu-S
iRGO industrial Gases 50 Ton Receiver
TOMCO Design
�64=y
e s
O O
r i
c
56'-6° 90"
CAPACITY 100,000 lbs. of carbon dioxide
MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE
OPERATING PRESSURE RANGE
WEIGHT OF EMPTY RECEIVER
INSULATION
SAFETY DEVICES
350 Psig
200 Psig to 300 Psig
55,000 lbs.
3" Polyurethane
0
Goss L j
I I •
ITEM
QUANTITY PURPOSE
SIZE SETTING
MANUFACTURER
Safety
I Main Safety
1 W, x 2" 350 Psig
ANDERSON.
Valve
Valve
GREENWOOD
Regulator
2 Vapor Pressure
3181' 330 Psig
CASH -ACME
Relief Valve
CONNECTIONS
Liquid Process Line I" with 1" Ball Valve
Liquid Fill Line 1 %- with I W' Ball Valve
Vapor Equalizing Line 1" with 1" Bill Valve
IQ -
Page 19 of 20
F3
n
LJ
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES
LOCATION: LOT, 5, IMRE ADDITION, SEh, SECTION 2
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (P.D.)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JANUARY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 8, 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
APPLICATION SUBMITTED: •An application has been submitted requesting
a Conditional Use Permit to allow two (2) above -ground liquid
storage tanks on lot 5 of the Imre Addition, west of T.H. 149
& north of T.H. 55.
BACKGROUND: The proposed storage tanks will be used to hold
liquid carbon dioxide (CO2) and diesel motor fuel for Airco Industrial
Gases. Currently the zoning is PD; surrounding land uses are
of the light industrial or general business nature. General
Coatings is to the immediate north as is Artistic Wood. An excavat-
ing company's building, to the east, i9 at least 250 feet from
Airco's eastern property line. Access to the site is provided
from a service drive that connects to a frontage road north of
T.H. 55.
TANK 1 (LIQUID CO2)
This CO2 tank, approved by the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME), will measure '14' x 75' and be 16' high (see
exhibits). The volume is 250 tons, however, the tanks only hold
75% liquid and are regulated by two separate_ sets of safety controls. .
The tank will be located 5' from the -7'_ chain link fence on the
north and west.
Carbon dixoide has a variety of uses including; carbonation
of beverages, fire extinguishing, freezing of meat and chilling
everything from medicines to semi -conductor components. C62
does not promote- combustion and as a result, this type of .tank
can often be stored within a building. The applicant intends
to- store this liquid only and wil not use it -on the site. Koch
Refinery of Rosemount is the supplier. The Building Inspection .
Department has approved this tank and plan at the January 6,
1986 staff review meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - AIRCO
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 2
TANK 2 (DIESEL MOTOR FUEL)
This proposed diesel fuel storage will measure 14' x 14' and
be 20' tall. The applicant wishes to place the tank in one of
two possible locations; 1) between warehouses 1 & 2 along the
eastern property line of the site or 2) just south of the proposed
CO2 tank. Due to the size and height of this tank, there will
be special safety precautions required by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency (MPCA) and a separate approval by the State Fire
Marshall's office.
The City Inspection's Dept has no other requirements other than
the written approval by the MPCA & State Fire Marshall's office.
CONDITIONS:
1) Detailed Landscape plan be submitted to bring the area into
compliance with City Code. Screeningshould be encouraged to
lessen the impact of these two tanks.
•
/aZ�Q
•
HTS
'
��
:'
-- - �- r -- - ----------
v..
IE
\
� LL+ )•
I
LLS\I
l�
O
S
crR•
C l'se.P C�
YC I•
`L*E�
'yi
6I
YIN
GC
R
3
Y/i
1
Rnl
.����
Iz+
• p� LML
zU
R0 �• 1RW
�
C Ym
O
llfai`x-6v ' u
I�
LIGNT IYPYSIR UL �YNDER DEYCLOpMENT�
.LOT I
I la.u..n. Y.FF WI.4L i /
LR.xnwus7eliF. � , _ _ e — it Lor z .
- Fw i euna.ucw . � I
T u ,
PART . LOT 5
I
gg I
yN d I---
\, . I L07 6
u LIyNT INDYSTLILL (YNPEE PEYMPMEMb
I
l 4y I
SS
LO !,"
-MRE-ADUTIC
MINNESOTA. '�-
1•R CD
APC Minutes
January 28, 1986
7. The pylon sign shal b oca a eet within the property line and
subject to the one time sig ainance fee 2.50 per square foot.
8. A detailed Lanasca aLan on h proposes gracing plan shall be
submitted demonstrating suita e s ng a berming of the parking areas.
9. An easement shall be created between Lot 1 and the Outlot to provide
road access between the two parcels at the time the outlot is developed.
10. Only one access shall be allowed from Krestwooa Lane into the outlot.
All voted in favor.
ECONOMICS LABO OR IN WAIVER OF PLAT
• City Planner Runkle advi t t licant had requested a continuance
of this matter. All members voted in favor of a continuance.
AIRCO INDUSTRIAL GASES — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then comme the public hearing for conditional use
permit for two above—ground d sto tanks on 2.3 acres on Lot 5 of the
Robert O'Neil homestead, locate p he southeast quarter of Section
2, north of Trunk Highway 455 na D oad.. A representative of the
applicant was present and wi a the uest for a conditional use permit
for a 14 ft. by 14 ft. by 2 hi esel tank, and is requesting only
consideration for a 14 ft. 7 t. CO2 tank. Mr. Mark Parranto was present
on behalf of RES Partne ship to object as being located too close to the
proposed office building sites. It was suggested that the tank might be
considered a heavy industrial use. Mulrooney moved, Trygg seconded the motion
. to recommend approval of the.conaitional use permit for CO2 tank. Four voted.:•
against and three voted in
EAGAN CENTVITE L REVIEW
Mr. Jim Curry was present• to v ew h Eagan Center Site Plan review,
which now included a self—service gas stat with grocery store and separate
service bays on the west end of. the proposed commercial site. Bohne
recommended approval of the site plan and subject to (1) City Ordinance, (2)
staff conditions, and (3) compliance with Uniform Building Code and any other
state building or fire codes. Trygg seconded the motion and all voted in
favor.
ZONING AMENDMEN—PUD RENEWAL,— PUD RENEWAL, EE TENSION 6 TERMINATION,
Because of the late hour, this item wantinued.
Agenda information t:emo
February i, 1586, City Council eeting
Page Thio'=y-Cne
SITE PLAN REVIEW/EAGAN CENTER
F. Site Plan Review for Eagan Center/Mark Ravich---A. site ,plan
review was considered at the last regular 'meeting of the Advisory
Planning Commission. The site plan review was presented by
Mar'., Ravich for: the Eagan Center located on a portion of the
commercial property identified as Lexington South Planned Develop-
ment and owned by Jim Curry. For additional information on
this item, refer to the City Planner's report found on pages
1,3/ through I33 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON—THIS ITEM: To provide Mr. Ravich
• with some direction regarding the concep_ plan as presented.
)30
MEMO TO: CHARLES HALL (CHAIRPERSON) & THE ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSON
FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
DATE: JANUARY 23, 1986
SUBJECT: EAGAN CENTER SITE PLAN REVIEW - LOCATED IN PART
SECTION 23, LEXINGTON AV & COUNTY RD 30
In 1984, Mr Jim Curry submitted a plan which revised the commercial
portion of the Lexington South Planned Development. This plan
reduced the amount of community shopping center district and
provided some neighborhood and limited business areas. The first
application was a preliminary plat in the neighborhood business
portion abutting Lexington Av, south of Co Rd 30. The one comment
made with this preliminary plat was that the square footage require-
ment of 20,000 sq. ft. still.be-upheld for the neighborhood business
portion. Mr Mark Ravich has been working with the first development
plan and is trying to obtain leases in order to construct a 20,000
sq. ft. strip center. Since the last approval in 1985, Mr Ravich
has changed the site plan slightly and would like to review this
with the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. The
preliminary plat and final plat will not change, therefore, no
repeat public hearing is needed for this review.
The change that Mr Ravich would like to discuss is on the north
end of the building. Instead of 'a'typical strip center, Mr Ravich
has been working with a service station that would provide gas
pumps on the north._ end of the building and also have 4 service
bays that would have access from the east side of the building.
Additional landscaping and berming has been done on the east
side by Center Drive in order to screen the access to the service
bays as much as possible. This facility would. contain two 20'
drive aisles so that cars may circulate around the pump island.
In reviewing the zoning ordinance, it appears that a service
station with service bays is a permitted use within the neighborhood
business district. This appears to be a unique concept with
tying it to the strip center. Mr Ravich would like to review
this concept with the Planning Commission and City Council. If
the Commission does approve this concept -`it should be subject
to a detailed landscape plan and revised grading plan so that
adequate berming can be provided around the east end of the building.
All other conditions placed on the Eagan Center lst Addition
shall be adhered to for this development plan.
131
I
r- �� °''15`ti� �• �� 5 �'.Ia; �}�},t�•1 1 - .411L��,- ',�4pt1 ��
f ( Y: r ) • w� • i
FUTURE -$TREAT-
i j i .. "•l:. '�' /''. 1 vv , - •Ms11L IIY rBYIIIIL?Ipl 'r �/
r, :..i • Y. '.� f.. •rte ��.. W:11: •r I •• .WI 11111- .\IW `
^s I �' � i,�% ./ � lid' •,�' � I I "I ' I
MIND
lip
l F .�,I, _ ♦ S S , S a:'• _ ,f 'y ''+AWki ...iu 'm11 --w-`^ ••
F Ilnw •—+ Y r
\>K" ia�I. 1 • i.-,� i r�%1 �� t� �� �� r.l a ar
.y � �.�J,�1`
' VV .\ LI 1 (•'ll .I .f 1 d I M L
t
lip
..i li W.t o<
07
LE%INOTOH AVE;
9
r
•• r\nMRi dIN.6UflflM I �1TdRl� CENTER FE�a ' '- ❑.
—•-�'� 5r wn 5i '� : _,'111E dPP€fl TFRflIF6
Amw MI11A€A91A 11{il
..
Agenda Informat_on
Fe,b%nary 18, 1986,
Page Thirty-. ;o
Memo
City Council Meeting
CONTRACT 86-5/WINDTREE 5TH AND 6TH ADDITIONS
A. Review of League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policies --On
January 21, 1986, the Council held a public hearing to discuss the
installations of streets and utilities that service the Windtree 5th
and 6th Additions. As a result of that public hearing, the Council
approved a project and authorized the preparation of detailed plans
and specifications which have now been completed and are being
presented to the Council for their review in consideration of
authorizing an advertisement for bid solicitation. The Public Works
Director and consulting engineer will be available to discuss the
details of these plans and a.9sw er any questions that may arise.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans and
specifications for Contract 86-5 (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions)
and to authorize an advertisement for a bid opening to be held at
10:30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, 1986.
CONTRACT 86 -7/0 -NEIL POND.
B. Contract 86-7, Approve Plans And Specifications (O'Neil Pond)
Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --On December 3, 1985, a public hearing was
held to discuss the pond's trunk storm ,sewer outlet for ;the ponds
being created on the O''Neil property under project 443. As a result
of that public hearing, the Council ordered the project to be
installed and authorized the preparation of detailed plans and
specifications which have now been completed and are being presented
to the Council for their review and consideration of authorizing
the advertisement for bid solicitation. The Public Works Director
and consulting engineer will be available to discuss the details
of these plans and answer any questions that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: -To -approve the plans and
specifications for Contract 86-5 .(:Windtree 5th and 6th Additions)
and to authorize an advertisement for a bid opening to be held
at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, 1986.
/3V
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
It is suggested that a Special City Council meeting be set for
Tuesday, March 11, 1986, for the purpose of reviewing our Management
By Objectives which essentially outlines specific goals and
objectives in a work program for 1986. At that meeting the City
Administrator would like to update the City Council on the status
of the radio communications system which has received additional
evaluation since budget discussions --last fall. There are some
various City Council and administrative policies that need to
be reviewed which could be considered at that meeting. The City
Administrator will provide a detailed agenda of information to
be discussed well in advance of the meeting. If this date is
agreeable to members of the City Council a motion will be suggested
at the meeting on Tuesday to set March 11 as a Special City
Council/Workshop session to review a number of items.
DETACHED HOUSING STUDY
Attached on page /39, is a copy of a memo sent to the Planning
Department regarding City Council member Wachte'r's motion to
further study the question as to whether the City has adequate
zoning and land use to handle single-family/detached housing
demands.
SPERRY
Attached on page 3 is a copy of a letter from the Sperry
Corporation acknowled ing their receipt of the City's proposal.
Sperry has indicated that they are preparing a statement to be
submitted to the City and the two regional. newspapers, the
Minneapolis Star and Tribune and St. Paul Dispatch, regarding
comments that were made by Don Bruun. Apparently, Mr. Bruun had
accepted a position with the Honeywell Corporation and is no longer
employed at Sperry. According to the Sperry Corporation, normally
formal press releases are prepared by that department and given
to the newspapers. According to Sperry personnel this procedure
was not followed on the Eagan proposal.
GOVERNOR'S TASK FORCE ON AIRPORT NOISE
Enclosed on page 1 is a copy of a newspaper article that
appeared in the February 12 edition of the Minneapolis Star and
Tribune regarding Governor Perpich's decision. to not accept the
recommendations of the Special Task Force on. Airport Noise at
this time.
NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL/PLAY AREA ADJACENT TO DIFFLEY ROAD
Attached is a copy of correspondence between the Director of
Elementary Education and the County's Traffic Engineer regarding
a proposal to address the safety of the play area along County
Road 30. This letter is enclosed on page �/-� for your review.
LMC ANNUAL CONFERENCE
The City Administrator's office is making reservations for the
LMC Annual Conference in Duluth, on June 17-20. Since there is
a City's Council meeting on June 17, lodging reservations have
been made for the nights of the 18th and 19th. If members of
the City Council desire to attend this conference please let this
office know as soon as possible.
CABLE TELEVISION �-
Enclosed on page /�4Y is a copy of—a letter from Group W that
outlines seven new basic services for the Burnsville/Eagan system.
SURPLUS BRICKS
The City contacted Midwest Brick and Supply Company and established
a price of 6258 per thousand for the surplus brick. The contractor
for the Northwestern Bell switching station, which is located
adjacent to the old City Hall, was agreeable to the price and
has purchased 4,000 bricks. Believe it or not, there are still
bricks left over for the City to use for some other purpose.
The Maintenance crews have been advised to relocate the bricks
to a safer storage area until they can either be sold or used
for a City purpose in the future.
0
GENERAL REVENUE SHARING 0.
Enclosed is a copy of a letter sent to the U.S. delegation regarding
General Revenue Sharing. A recent National League of Cities
newsletter requested that cities state their position on Federal
Revenue Sharing through correspondence by mayors. This:letter.,
is attached on pages /�43 through �_ attempted to outline
the use and benefit General Revenue Sharing dollars have provided
to this City.
MACTA
A copy of a. letter// /t�hat Mr. Bob Cooper received from, MACTA is
enclosed on page 2J�- Apparently, the Eagan report was shown
at the recent MACTA convention and is being distributed as a model
to other communities.
134
GOVERNOR PERPICH'S PROPOSED BUDGET CUT
Enclosed on page A4— is a copy of a letter from Speaker of
the House Dave Jennings that was addressed to city officials.
Also enclosed on page /217 is a copy of a print out that
illustrates the impact on he City of Eagan if the Governor's
budget cut is adopted. The City has budgeted approximately
$1,177,000 for 1986 and in reality would only receive $1,076,000
or an estimated $101,000 reduction in the appropriation. Obviously,
the impacts vary quite substantially between cities if you look
at the amount Duluth would lose under the Governor's budget cut.
Since all cities are in "wait and see" until the end of the session
there is no need for action to be taken at this time, however,
it may become necessary this spring to address some type of budget
adjustment or allocate reserves for the loss of revenue.
SBOARD OF REVIEW MEETING
The City has received a letter from the Dakota County Assessor's
office asking- that the City determine by February 28, a date for
the Board of Review meeting for 1986. The date that is being
suggested by the Dakota County Assessor's office is Wednesday,
May 28, 1986. If this meeting date is agreeable, the City Clerk's
office will so indicate to the Assessor's office.
HRA UPDATE
Enclosed on pagesthrough-Lj-7j is a copy of the most recent
status report for Assisted Housing Community Development
MLC UPDATE
Enclosed is a copy of the MLC update. You will note that the
amount under the Governor's budget reduction on page 3 of that
report varies slightly from the print out that was addressed earlier
in this memorandum. C-JQgeS 4krow1h
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
/--17
MEMO TO: DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: FEBRUARY 12, 1986
SUBJECT: DETACHED HOUSING STUDY
In official action that was taken by the City Council at a regular
meeting held on Tuesday, February 4, 1986, staff .was directed to
conduct a complete analysis of future single-family/detached
housing demands and needs for the community.
I would like your department to make such•an analysis and hopefully
have your study completed for review at one of the two March City
Council meetings. City Councilmember Wachter who was the author
of the motion is concerned about future demographics and whether
the City has adequate zoning and land use to handle the single-
family/detached housing demands that—could be placed on this
community.
Possibly information as provided by the Met Council and other
agencies could be helpful in compiling an analysis. Certainly
trends that are occurring in Eagan regarding the number of single-
family permits would be helpful and this data should be shared in
such an analysis. I reminded the City Council that statistical
data was provided at the Comprehensive Guide Update and again,
this information could be included in such a study.
If you have any questions, I would suggest contacting City Council -
member Wachter either through a meeting with myself or by telephone
so our 'study completely addresses his concerns.
City 'Adci�inis'- tr6toF "
cc: City Councilmember Ted Wachter
TLH/kf
�Ir
•
0
SPERRV CORPORATION
DEFENSE PRODUCTS GROUP
SPERRV PARK, P.O. BOX 64525
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55164-0525
TELEPHONE (612) 456-2222
February 7, 1986
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City Administrator.
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P. 0. Box 21199
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Dear Tom,
This is to acknowledge receipt of the City of Eagan's proposal providing
certain economic assistance should Sperry decide to consolidate some of its
business activities in Eagan. Your proposal was very professional and
states clearly the possibilities that exist. We appreciate the effort that
you and your staff and the members of the City Council expended to produce
such a concise document.
As discussed in our meeting on February 6, the object of the City's proposal
is to assist Sperry in coming to a decision in its facilities feasibility
study. With the City's proposal now in hand, Sperry will be able to
conclude such study and reach a decision on the overall issue of
consolidation. Hopefully, this final evaluation process will not take too
long.
We wish to convey our thanks to you, the
for your excellent efforts in this matter
study, Sperry looks to the continuance of
Sincerely,
E. T. Michaud
ETM/rbc
/39
officials of Eagan and your staff
Regardless of the outcome of the
our fine relationship.
' t -11-t e
Session '86 = ;-
Perpich_ .I.I:'=
disregard -
plan $r®m T3
-noise panel
} By Laurie Blake.''
I Staff Writer iirt�' t 'r1
Gov. Rudy Perpich has decided to -
ignore the recommendations of his
special Task Force on Airport Noise
and give the Metropolitan Airports
Commission another chance to im-
prove the airport noise problem, ac-
cording to Sandra Gardebring, head
of the task force: _ -
- Perpich did not accept the task'
._force's- primary., recommendallon,-.
that the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency- (MPCA),take a supervisory--_
.arole - In working with the airports
commission to reduce Jet noise over
the communities surrounding Minne-
apolis -St. Paul International Airport,
Gardebring said Tuesday. . .
Perpich believes the airports com-
mission has demonstrated a' new:
awareness of the problem and
i should be permitted to try to reduce
noise without the pressure of . the
MPCA.shesaid
c_i!:�.�'
The governor's office referred all
i questions on the task force report to
Gardebring,who also is chairwoman'.
of the Metropolitan Council. Te
The president of the South Metro
Airports Action Council, the anti -
noise citizens group, criticized Per.
pich. Frank Arlo said airport offl-.
cials have proven in the past that
they cannot control noises:,.u,C<;.
"I think the governor, by taking this'.
kind of stance, is saying at this point
the political process really refuses to
deal with a very serious economic
and environmental issue. The people
)n our area would have hoped we
• Noise cohtinued on page 4,R
-n..-�..j,.: -yam:, ;'ti •ti`
Of
Contlnued from page 1HE>'�
i 3
could count more significantly upon
Session '861
our elected officials to give us some, -
.
answers and some help with this,"',,.-
Arlo said ' } i "' t � ,, "
debring said. "' •' " " -
-
Rep Wes Skoglund, DFL•Mlnneapo- `Hamlet said the. airport Is planning
Its, and a task force member, also
three remedies to help reduce noise
criticized Perpich's declslon.•:"d!'••-=',
this summer. implement more strin-
gent restrictions on night use of the
"That's 'absolutely horrible: He is
airport, direct all training flights to .
selling out south Minneapolis, Rich-,
other airports and repeat noisesensi-
field and Bloomington if that Is true:'
tivity seminars for pilots and airline''
If IVs true It bolls my blood Skog-
controllers.
lund sald. ',: �,.- , :,, r' , -e.
, -,..d int,/ ri ;:v
ro, 1.
In the longer term, the airport com .. !
"'�'he first thing the go44einoi'ought.`_;
mission has a 17 -point plan for Im-,
to do is throw almost all of the com- '
proving the noise problem, Including'
misslonets' off the board. The envi. _
an extension of Runway 4.22 to allow
ronmental problem grew with all of'. `
for more evenly 'distributed airport
'them there and none of them did
traffic, and a study of the noise ceil-
'enything about It until literally thou-'.
Ing concept endorsed by. the task
'sands of people decided to say -force,
Hamielsaid .:�y.1.�;=...-'.,�� -
enough Skoglund said.,'
..7.vltun�
Perpich appointed the special task
n.. Mike Freeman. DFL -Richfield; '
force In October following a record -
,also a task force member, said he Is
breaking summer of resident com-
dlsappointed that the governor made
plaints about airport noise and gro
up his mind on the task force recom-
Ing cltlzen dissatisfaction with the
mendatlons before meeting with oth-
commission's a'etion on the problem. -'
er task force members. He and Skog- _ ;'
- ��••'• ` r�'.--/ -
lund have a meeting scheduled with. -
The governor asked the task force to
Perpich Tuesday.
review options for reducing noise
I
'-'
and report back to him with recom-
Jeff Hainig,,'�exeeutive�director of.
mendations for short-term and long -
the airports commission, said: "The--
term noise Improvements. In Janu-
message is clear. Gov. Perpich ex.,'
ary, the task force delivered a list of
pects the airport commission to pro--;.
17 ways to redufe noise y -
ceed aggressively in taking any ac-",":
tions we can to deal with this serious: _
The strongest recommendation 'was
Problem. We will do so ' :_. s
to Immediately place a cap on over-
-t,.'.
all noise (at Its 1984 level, to start.
I
Gardebring said Perpich-wants the
with) and order airlines to observe --
airports commission to submit a de-
this ceiling by either limiting flights
tailed report by May I on how It will
or using quieter planes. It said the
"proceed on the noise problem: "He
MPCA should work with the airports
has asked me to Impress upon them
commission to establish this noise .
the fact that he is expecting a real
ceiling and to set a schedule for `
demonstration of commltment," Gar- 'achieving
IL G, s -'t ` -I I
Of
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196
14445 DIAMOND PATH
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 ■CALVIN E. ZWIEFEL
612-423-9400 DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION
January 22, 1986
Mr. Peter L. Sorenson
Traffic Engineer, Dakota County
1560 Highway 55
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Mr. Sorenson:
4,,,.,. ,
�
i\t:. L,!�I U Jul•. i J .i l•i/
In response to your letter of October 12, 1985, we have reviewed the situation
at Northview Elementary School concerning the safety of the play area along
County Road 30. We have agreed to do the following as a result of our study:
1. 'Construct a 600' fence,at Northview School along County Road
30,.20' from the existing southern edge of the soccer field.
2. The height of the fence will be 6' and constructed of 9 gauge
chain link fencing:
3. As there are no activities in this play area during the winter
we will construct the fence as soon as the ground thaws in
early spring of 1986.
We appreciate your involvement in this matter and encourage you to contact us
if you have any additional concerns.
Sincerely,
Calvin Zwie el
Director of Elementary Education
CZ:nk
xc: Dr. Sanford Witter, Interim Superintendent
Dr. Ron Hoekstra, Deputy Superintendent -
Bob Ferguson, Principal, Northview Elementary
VTom Colbert, Director of Public Works, City of Eagan
GROUP
IV
CABLE
Group @ .',.I �'e. Inc A Subsidiary of
\VESI C31 (OUSE BROADCASTING AND CABLE. INC
4:65 SIGI.L! MEMOMAL HIGHWAY
Eki�N MN 55127 (G_': 894-2450
February 4, 1986
Ralph B. Campbell, III
Cable Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P o Box 21199
Eagan, MN 55121
Dear Ralph:
This letter is to inform you and the Cable Commission members that Group W
Cable is planning to launch seven new Basic services on the Burnsville/
Eagan system. These seven include:
- Arts and Entertainment
- Black Entertainment Television
- The Discovery Channel
- Country Music Television
- Financial News Network
- Trinity Broadcast Network
- Video Hits One
The proposed launch date for these channels is April 1, 1986. Channel
assignments will be determined in the near future.
nk you for your interest in these services and please feel free to contact
if you have any questions.
Cly,
JW. Camiers
General Manager
GROUP W CABLE
cc: Tan Hedges, Eagan City Administrator /
Linda Barton, Burnsville City Manager
l��
0
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. .P,0. BOX 21199 . _
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A SMITH
VIC ELLISON
•
•'THEODORE WACHTER
February 7, 1986
COpnC11AABnwm
THOMAS HEDGES
CIN PAminlsfralor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
CiN Clerk
THE HONORABLE BILL FRENZEL
UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
1026 LONGWORTH OFFICE BLDG
WASHINGTON D C 20515
Re: General Revenue Shari
Dear Representative F e"1:
I am writing this letter to encourage you to support the
continuation of the general revenue sharing program. There were
a number of reasons why this program was started in '1972 and
those reasons remain valid; consequently, the Federal
Government's commitment should also continue. In helping to
provide essential support for the nation's local governments in
meeting the costs of implementing national policies and in
assisting in the maintenance of services and facilities required
for economic growth, the program has proven to be efficient and
effective. The concept of using the Federal. Government's ability
to raise revenues in partnership with local governments' unques-
tioned knowledge of public demands for local government services
allows for the greatest possible use of limited resources.
The City of Eagan has used General Revenue Sharing funds for
acquisition, construction and improvement to major community
facilities, including the purchase of land, construction of a
police facility, partial funding of a municipal government center
and expansion of the maintenance garage. Other items of benefit
to the total community purchased with these funds include early
warning sirens and voting equipment. As a very rapidly growing
community, tremendous pressure is placed on City officials to
provide necessary infrastructure and essential governmental
services.
Given the value of the program to this City, the continued
validity of tax base sharing and limited ability to raise
replacement revenues locally, it is essential that this program
be continued.
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
February 7, 1986
Page Two
Thank you for your anticipated support in this matter. If you
would like any additional information or would like to discuss
the situation in more detail, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Zin
Beatta Blomquist
Mayor
cc: Representative Frenzel_s_Bloomington Office
BB/kf
SAME LETTER SENT TO:
SENATOR RUDY BOSCHWITZ, UNITED STATES SENATE
SENATOR DAVID DURENBERGER, UNITED STATES SENATE
Ll
Minnesota Association of Cable Television Administrators
3800 IDS Tower
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 343-1102
February 8, 1986
Mr. Robert Cooper
1472 Highview Avenue
Eagan, Minn. 55121
Re: MACTA Conference
Dear Bob:
Burnsville/Eagan, in my opinion, has taken the lead in the state as a
progressive Cable Television Commission. I think you gave examples of why
this is true in your presentation at the conference. We have just begun to
use the media as we should in governmental uses. Your session gave many of us
new ideas to use.
Thank you for your help and keep up the good work.
Yours truly, c
Peter E. Stleoi y�jo� "
MALTA, Conference Chair
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Robert G. Newby, Chair — South Washington County Cable Commission
Bootsie. Anderson, Vlce•Chair — North Suburban Cable Commission
Jan Haugen, Secretary — hake Minnetonka Cable Commission
Peter E.-Stolley, Treasurer — City of Northfield
Donald Melrme, Director — Quad Cities Cable Commission /
Betsy Pierce, Director — Burnsville/Eagan Cable Commission
David M. Jennings
Speaker of the House
District 29A
Martin-Watonwan Counties
February 6, 1986
Dear City Official:
Minnesota
House of
Representatives
(Please share this letter with your mayor and council members.)
It was recently announced that our DFL governor, Rudy Perpich,
has underestimated state revenue collections by $734 million. To
make up for his error, Governor Perpich has proposed cutting
state aid payments to local units of government.
Your city's finances would be seriously impaired if the DFL
governor's plans are adopted. Not only would you see your local -
government -aid payments reduced, but homestead credits as well.
Governor Perpich is leaving locally -elected officials such as
yourself with little choice but to raise local real estate taxes.
That may solve the state's fiscal dilemma, but it does so by
transferring the problem to you at the local level.
The IR House majority intends to fight to protect our cities from
bearing the burden of the state's fiscal mismanagement. Your
assistance is necessary if we are to persuade the DFL governor
and Senate liberals that cities should be spared from cuts.
Please take a few minutes to call or write the DFL governor and
your local senator, and ask them to support the efforts of House
Independent -Republicans to balance the state budget by cutting
areas other than local -government aid.
We're going to fight to try and come through this current budget
problem without impairing the ability of local governments to
serve their citizens.
Sincerely,
David M ennings
Speaker of the House
rel r"'yj�J;Ei
01011L_.
2/ 3/86 0
PROJECTED IMPA• OF GOVERNOR PERPICH'S RECOMMENDED BUDGET
GOVERNOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 1986 LGA CUT BY 8..1%, 1986 HOMESTEAD CREDIT
NOTE: '86 homestead credit amounts are projected based on very limited data. Check with
CUTS
(HC) CUT BY 8.78%
county auditor for better estimatE
NAME
1986 LGA
1986 LGA
I EST 1986 HC
EST 1986 HC
I EST TOTAL 186
EST TOTAL 186
EST $ LOf
BEFORE
AFTER
I BEFORE
AFTER
I LGA + HC
LGA + HC
DUE TO Ll
CUTS
8.1% CUT
I CUTS
8.8% CUT
I BEFORE CUTS
AFTER CUTS
& HC CUl
DULUTH
11,784,789
10,830,655
1 3,463,170
3,159,104
1 15,247,959
13,989,759
1,258,24
DUMONT
14,750
13,556
1 2,299
2,097
8,074
1 17,049
1 31,676
15,653
29,051
1,3'.
2,&
DUNDAS
22,825
5,287
20,977
4,859
1 8,851
1 1,004
916
1 6,291
5,775
5:
DUNDEE
DUNNELL
21,175
19,461
1 7,082
6,460
1 28,257
25,921
2,3:
.EAGAN, „,. , ; , a =;:315, 094 •.::::..;:Fi..
289, 583 ,;
I 862, 665
:_, _, _ _. ,, 786, 923
I _, ,,.,; 1, 177, 759 ._
1 122,722
,, . _ 1, 076, 506
112,563
101, 2:
10,1:
EAGLE BEND
LAKE
90,097
80,0224
82,802
73,545
1 32,625
1 67,707
29,761
61,762
1 147,731
135,307
12,41
EAGLE
EAST BETHEL
131,713
121,049
1 79,812
72,805
1 211,525
193,854
17,6;
EAST GRAND F
859,575
789,981
1 330,353
301,348
1 1,189,928
1,091,329
98,5'
EAST GULL LA
4,263
3,918
I 2;861
2,610
91983 II
I 7,124
39,981
6,528
36,669
5
3,3
EASTON
\ ECHO
29,037
56,766.-
26,686
52,170
1 10,944
1 15,797
14,410
1 72,563
66,580
5,9;
EDEN PRAIRIE
306,875
282,029
1 785,966
716,958
1 1,092,841
1 125,544
998,987
115,235
93,8'
10,3'
V EDEN VALLEY
104,490
96,030
1 21,054
1 65,932
19,205
60,143
1 139,724
127,961
11,7
EDGERTON
EDINA
73,792
550,444
67,818
505,878
1 1,139,697
1,039,632
1 1,690,141
1,545,510
144,6
EFFIE
1,787
5,408
1,642
4,970
1 0
1 14,195
0
12,949
1 1,787
1 19,.603
1,642
17,919
1
I,6'
EITZEN
ELBA
15969
1,810
1 1,332
1,215
I 3,301
3,025
2
ELBOW LAKE
176,070
161,815
1 60,661
55,335
1 236,731
217,150
19,5
ELGIN
49,387
45,388
1 26,554
24,223
3,362
1 75,941
1 18,119
69,611
16,626
6,2
1,4
ELIZABETH
ELK RIVER
14,433
291,986
13,264
268,346
1 3,686
1 167,205
152,524
1 459,191
420,.870
38,-
ELKO
7,460
6,856
1 6,815
6,217
1 14,275
13,073
1,E
ELKTON
8,935
8,212
1 5,359
4,888
14,,010
1 14,294
1 72,260
13,100
66,305
1,1
5,c
ELLENDALE
ELLSWORTH
56,902
67,201
52,295
61,760
1 15,358
1 20,513
18,712
1 87,714
80,472
7,E
ELMDALE
1,276
1,173
73,453
1 2,405
1 34,989
2,194
31,917
1 3,681
1 114,913
3,367
105,370
9,`_
ELMORE
ELROSA
79,924
4,512
4,147
1 8,768
7,998
1 13,280
12,145
1,1
ELY
571,409
525,146
1 1722,945
157,760
1 744,354
682,906
61,E
ELYSIAN
71,783
65,971
1 16,066
14,655.
1 87,849
80,626
7,F
EMILY
15,791
14,.513
1 15,957
14,556
1 31,748
29,069
2,(
EMMONS
59,113
54,327
1 14,369
13,107
1 73,482
67,434
6,4
DAKOTA COUNTY
HRA
flu IN
nunnw
Serving People and Communities
MEMORANDUM
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496 -145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred
Joy, County Administrator; and D�a}kkota County Planning Department
FROM: Mark Ulfers, Executive Director'/IJ��NAU11�� S
SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSIUNG AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: February 6, 1985
Enclosed are the January Status Reports for all the Assisted Housing Programs in
Dakota County and the Community Development Programs administered by the Dakota
County HRA. ,
If you would like additional information on any of the programs, please feel
free to call me.
Enclosure
Iq
"AN FnllAI nOGnDTI D,nr cuoi MVC1'-
•
Brief description of assisted housing programs:
Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of
Their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti-
lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or
South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal
inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by
the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits.
2. Moderate Rehab,: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners
of rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring
their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner,
in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent
Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota
County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8
Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer
available.
3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy
for construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent
these units to eligible low and moderate -income households. The rental
payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve-
lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in
place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects
for senior citizens.
4. Low Rent Housing: The Dakota County HRA,(or South St., Paul HRA) owns and
manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program.
These housing.units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house-
holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an
established allowance for utilities) for rent.
5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and
moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer
available.
• 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc-
tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units
to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for
tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in
place, this program is no longer available.
��y
* South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 Existing and Low Rent Housing Programs.
^0YvOTA CC_'NTY AS5I57EU
CiSING R -701T JA`J19Y,
1345
I `E:TIO`: 8 1
"3"E3ATT I
3
,c, i
EIIIG""13 1
RES AE
'''C
rnV
vOViT?ES
- N TP'
:'O 'A-ILY 701- _
1
' n =ov. y
TO .
9
P'
° -Y
T 3io_'
_ q
•v_
LY
i9'
r V
_1:.
-
------------------------I------------------I---------00000000-----------
" VAL_eY
I U 42 53 1
2 0
2
8
=
I ------------------I------------------------------------------
`°
e•
3 f
Z
--- ---------------------I------0000--
----
0000- - I-
000
0000-- --
-
0----!0000--
0000--
- -----!-
0000---0000--
-0000--0000-'
�------0000--I-------------0000-'
. VIL'_E
58 123 161 1
'---------------`-!---------------------
2 0
n
2,
17
G
„7 :
'00------------
R
-S
c.,
_.,
0
-------- ---
:30
'0000--------I
1 58
-----------0000--
4
------------------------
p3CX
I----------------
1 32 'S^ 1°4
0 2
"
73
3' 1
2
;5
:° !
2
i44
R
I-------
35r'
..--------
335
-----------------------
?4':\STC!'
------------------I------------------i--
! 22 48 72 1
2 2
-----------------
7;
- :
------------
..-----------------------'----------------I----------------'----------------'---------------`-------...---0000--
143 ---
4 M1
„ ,
-
23
3
:23
,
E
�_ -----0000--
..I..
-----
-0000--0000-----0000---I----.
:\VAR GROVE HEIGHTS
-- -------------i---0000--00000000-,
'c7 18?. '03
2 0
2 I
2
. _ -'0000-
2
:-.
..----_-----
2
_ -!_
-------�--
3:
-- ------0
2*-
r'.'.'
—
41'
—
------------------------------------------I------------------'------
------------------------
---
-----
----------
_.._..
...-------- -------'---�0000
LILYOAL=
-------._.__.
2 2 0!
0 2
0 1
2
2
—'I
0
0
0
0
__._
........._
- -
—
------------------------
'E`!f OSA
------------------'--------------
2 3!
2 0
----I---'-----;0000--
0 I
2
2
___0000--_.._
0!
1
0
-
--..._....._
0
`+EYOOTq HE15HT5
k - 0 - 7 ,A
--------------
0
12
—
—
I
13
:3
---
------------------------I
3CSE"p'NT
V2 ------------------
3 3 319 I
------------------
2 0
2
3
'57
2
J`
!
`
z
I---- ---
43
0
-I---------
'1°
----._...:
"
-----------------------I----------------•-!------------------
;L'TH ST. ^A'JL
3S 134 ±70 1
2 0
2
------------------
8
44
I--
44 1
-----------
.'.22.
2
...----
322 !
------------
5::
------------------------
I------------------
------------------
i------------------
I-------------------------------
'------------
--------
-------
---
: .
- --- ---- - -
ST. PAL-
OT.
1-00000000---0000--I------0000
- -- 1
153 353 I
0 6
I---0000--
6 I
I-------0000--
0
---
0
I------0000--
0
82
7
I------------I-------0000-'-------------------
87
-- -
2
------0000--1--0000--
?
0000--
i 274
_7i
--- '
\
------0000--
7 Ela
-- --.
I------0000-- -�-
--
1 6 7 1
-0000-- ---
0 0
-�6
2
0
0
- 0-------------------i
II
2 1
0
2
0 1
------------------------'------------------------------------------------------1------------------'-----------------------!-----
-------0000—i
-
TOTALS
------ --------------
I I
1 463 1250 15^c4 1
I
I------------------ I-----------
4 21
------
I
25 I
I
I------------------
247
x23
I
547 1
I
I------------------
332
174
1
554 1
I
I
!------------
41
1 526
I
I
I -00000000---I-----0000----0000-`
1
!?-j4
"'P.=
32:5 ;
I
I
* South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 Existing and Low Rent Housing Programs.
Brief description of Community Development Programs:
1. Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and
Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low-
income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious
fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high.heating
costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising
utility bills.
2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State
program as'a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners
(adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items
and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is
charged depending on the applicant's income.
3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income
homeowners adjusted gross income under $7,000 annually) for rehabilitation
items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and
accessibility of the home. The interest rate is 3% and deferred loans are
available to households with—adjusted gross incomes under $6,000 annually.
This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the
Dakota County HRA.
4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for
energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross
incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with
adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi-
nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
5. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental
units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot
exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one
unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The
interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the
Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
• 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done
using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and
moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low
interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program
is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given .to eligible low and moderate
income homeowners for energy items. The eligible homeowners are referred
from Northern States Power Company and Minnegasco. This program is admi-
nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA.
8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc-
tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the
property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some
types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and
residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%.
This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the
Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas.
/ItV
AMOTA COUNTY RAA COYJAMITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT MY 1976 -JANUARY 1986
I HfATHERIMIJON MITA HDME IMPAAV LOAN MIIAA HOME REHAB LOAN MHFA HOME ENERGY LOAN
[MnVIT!5S I ELD EAM TOTAL ELD LO 54 TOTAL ELD LG 51 TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL
----- _------- 1____I_—_I----- --- _I____I—_I----- _--_I____I____
.IPPLE VALLEY 1 3 1 67 1 73 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I 1 1 4 1
___-________I ----- I___,_1__—_ __—I ----- 1 ----- I---- ___ I_____ I____I___ _ I_—I----- I_____
PURN5V!!- 1 15 1 127 1 142 0 1 i 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 1 4 1 5 P 1 0! 2 1 2
_____.------- I _. ___I----- I----- ----- I_____I----- I ----- _____I_____ 1_____ I ----- ____j____1____ I ----
CANNON =XI -5 I 1 1 2 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 fl 1 0 1 1 1 1
CPGTLE ?OCH I 2 1 4 1 4 . 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 I I 1 1 2 0 1 2 1 P I 0
.____G_^ -PN _____--___I____I__+ _ _-1 ----- 1---- I_—_ ---- I ---- I --- I----- ----- I ---- I ---- I -----
c 1 4 1 51 1 `6 0 I 1 1 5 1 6 3 1 1 1 2 1 61 1 1 1 5 1 7
--- ----! ----- I ----- I ----
FP3X!'STON 2a i :05 1 Its 0 1 2 1 7 1 9 2 1 1 1 4 1 7 2 1 1 1 13 1 Is
_
--- __________1____1__.__1_____ ____1____1____1_____ ____I_ --- I__—I----- ______I___I_—_
HAST'N53 1 43 1 124 1 167 5 1 6 1 21 1 32 21 1 4 1 11 1 36 1 1 2 1 3 1 6
HANFT]N ! I1 !6 0 1 2 1 21 2 3! 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 0 1 P 1 0
___1-____ —_! ----- I_____ I____ ___ I ---- I----- 1_--- _____ I____ I_____ I__--
!N7CR SRIVEI 20 1101 1 - 7 1 4 1 IPI 17 4 1 2 1 IS I 21 0 0 1 6 1 6
--------------- 1 ----- I____I___ _____1_____1____I_____ _ 1 ----- 1 ----- 1—__ ----- 1 ----- 1 ---- 1____
LPRE1^'LE 1 16 1 04 1 122 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 0 1 0 1 3 3
!-- aI 2I 2 AI PI 0I a PI PI BI 0 0I 0I AI 0
NG9E'CCTA 1 2 1 z' 4 2 1 a l 0 1 2 2 1 6 1 2 1 2 e 1 0 1 0
'.E GTS '.'ETGH"i 2 i :a IB a I 1 1 2 1 3 3 1 a 1 2 1 5 1 4-,-. '_,-- 6
MIESVIL! E i 1 1 1 1 2 P I P I 0 1 0 P I 0 1 0 1 0 P I 2 1 0 1
NOATH'C`SJ' S 1 1P I 15 B 1 2 1 1 1 1 0 1 B 1 P 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1
- AA'f?YA 1 0 1 D I P x l P I 0 1 P P I B B! P P 2 1 ! I
- I! a 01 11 II 2
R ------H - 2 9! 1 1 1 1 2 P 1 0 1 x
.L .._. !-�°3 ---- -__ I__ —I___a I___� __P i—� '__^ 1___� __ a 16
ROS—OUNIT 1 9 1 65 7 J 1 1 1 6 1 7 6 1 0 1 2 1 6 0 1 J 15
S'UTH "T.^^L'L 7' 1 0
______;_____ I___. 1_____ ._ —_; _____I_I____ _____I____I_____1_ _____ I
^•`'- ^3C I x! I P A
v": .'7111 1 , I n l 4 a! 0 1 x 1 2 P I 111 a! I r I
----- ----1'--'I----I---------1---I-----1----- ---I
L
:;--
-_^- -----+ 72 • c 6 ' 31 1 57 14 1 6 �I ISI 35 5 1 P 1 5
I I I I I I I I ! I I
I 1 I I I 1 I
707AL5 L77 f^72 .:7:5 71 I 27 I 94 I '42 61 I 16 I SBI 135 !0 I 6 I 62 I 71
I I I ! I I I I I I
! I 1 1 I I I
RENTAL REHAB LOAN COBS REHAB LOAN 0000 REHAB LOAN - YR, YHFA SOLAR PP,NR LOAN 312 '_OPIIS I
ELD LG SM TOTA'_ ELD LG SN TOT?'_ CLO LG 54 TOTW_ ELD L'.- BM TOTP_ -. CAr S.F.: C0C1 ElO TOTALI
AI 21 01 P 01 BI PI 'J PI 01 PI PI 21 21 JI PI x: di 2:
_____ -----1___—I___-_I _____ -----
01 el 01 0 11 01 31 4 AI PI 21 2 a 01 al 0 a! al
----- ____I_____I_____I_____ _____1___1___1_____ _____ I ----- --------- . ...... I
01 BI 01 0 01 PI 01 P 'al PI PI r 01 21 01 2 -PI CI PI 'dl PI
01 PI 01 0 01 01 01 P PI 01 Pi P -PI 21 81 0 A! PI al PI P;
BI 01 01 a 11 11 d 71 d: el 1 7! DI a. x -- a'
01 BI 01 0 71 11 41 12 dl al JI 51 OI al 7. xi 2 I II
-
---1------- -----1-----1----1----- - 1---- ----I-'--- 1----1----1--- -
4 1 1 1 5 1 It 17 I 1 1 10 30 0 I A! T a- P -I P 4 1
4 1 I -_ ---_-_ I - '—± - I
____I----- I----
____I___I____1----- ___ I_ -___I__— ----- _—__
PI PI 01 0 21 11 !I 2
1 2
flI2
A P P 1 1 4 1 B I '3 A! 1 1 x i 2 a 1 2 2 1
1
AI PI al r 41 01 21 fi 2121 PI x 21 1'. JI .- DI 21 al '21 BI
___. ----- _____1 _____I__ --q ____ .____i_—
1 P -
PI AI PI 1 1! 2!
1 1 2 1 2 1 ! 2 1 IP -- ----- ------L--- ----
B
--�__-_ - - ,—.
I
81 el P! 0 01 PI BI P BI AI PI a PI 2I PI a DI P! al
_____ ----- I_____1____1 ---- .. ----- 1____1____1----- _____1_____I_____;_____ _____,-
•---i-
L____ -----1___-1___n I___1_ _I__ _I____I—^ .__, I___A I____I__ ----- ----
_- -----
_-_ _____
I I I 1
'_
____ ---- --- -
-_,
1 4 0 1 P!---- --
I-----------1 -' '- 1- I I B -'---'1- a l E
P ,_—__ -----
----- ----------- I
J --- ----- ----- ---- ---- - 1 --- ---1---_'1___2 11-- ----- N 1---1----_1-----I
-----r-------------I-- I I I - I P 0 1 10 I
I — -
19 1 P• I 13 1 °° 5 I Is l 54 1 12s 0 1 a l 0 1 0 8 1 0 I 2 1 2 ! I
1 I I I I 1
I
24 1 ! 1 IBI 43 e7 1 31 1 95 1 CI a l P I 2 1 2 d l -3
I I .
---
— ------ _—_ ----- -- ---------------------
-
'MH - Mobile Home ',
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
Vol. III, No. 1 - February 1986
MLC Update Changes Focus
Update has changed. This issue marks the beginning of the third
year Update has been published by the Municipal Legislative Com-
mission. During the past two years the primary audience of Update
was the mayors and city council members of the 15 MLC member
cities. Beginning with this issue„ the primary audience will
be the 23 state representatives and 15 state senators that
comprise the MLC Legislative Delegation.
Several months ago, the MLC Communications Subcommittee chaired
by Jim Willis, City Manager of Plymouth, recommended to the MLC
that the focus of Update be shifted to the legislative delegation.
The objective of this publication is to inform legislators of
MLC's legislative program and the key issues of concern to our
suburbs. It will also serve as a vehicle to disseminate informa-
tion about our cities and the individuals that run these cities.
Update will provide legislators with information that specifically
addresses the cities they represent.
• In this issue, articles have been included that discuss the
effects of the Governor's proposed cuts in local government
aid and homestead credit, a summary of the 1986 policy resolu-
tions adopted by the MLC Board of Directors at the January
Board Meeting, a profile of the new MLC City Inver Grove Heights
and a background piece on Minnetonka City Manager James Miller
who is the new President of the League of Minnesota Cities.
Update will be published monthly during the legislative session
ann monthly during the interim. The MLC lobbyist, Larkin,
Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd., is responsible for its publica-
tion.
Distribution of Update will include the 38 legislators 'who are
members of the MLC Legislative Delegation, legislative leadership,
Mayors and city council members from our 15 cities, the Capitol
and suburban press, and individuals and organizations that deal
with local government issues.
If any reader has suggestions for changes or comments, please
contact Jim Willis at 559-2800.
/.�3
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
rage
Governor's Budget Reduction Plan Cuts Suburban Aid
Governor Perpich announced his budget reduction recommendations
on January 23. The Legislature, facing a $734 million revenue
shortfall, must balance the budget before the 1986 Legislative
Session adjourns.
The Governor's recommended cuts will have a serious affect on
local governments. In October, MLC President, Burnsville
Mayor Connie Morrison, sent the Governor, legislative leadership 7
and members of the MLC Legislative Delegation a letter stating.
that the MLC would be willing to share in balancing the State's
budget, but that the cuts should be uniform and fair. The MLC
policy was, and continues to be, that budget cuts should be across-
the-board.
Although the Governor announced that all budgets would be cut an
uniform 3.5 percent (except for school aids, which is to be cut
2.5 percent), the fact is that 1986 local government aid previously
committed to the 15 MLC suburbs will receive an 8.86 percent cut.
In addition, MLC cities will receive a 9.76 percent reduction in
the homestead credit payments. The reason these cuts are greater
than 3.5 percent is because the Governor's recommendation of 3.5
percent is against the biennial appropriation. Since one year of
the biennium has already passed, local government aid and home-
stead credit cuts have to be doubled. However, a 7 percent cut •
of 1986 local government aid pays amounts to $21 million, not
the $25.2 million the Governor is recommending. The Governor's
recommendation adds an additional $4..2 million to the local
,government aid cut. The rationale, which makes little sense,
is that this additional amount equals a 3.5 percent cut of
miscellaneous aids and credits such as the'native prairie credit,
wetlands credit, agricultural preservation credit, etc. These
aids and credits were not cut.
The Governor's budget recommendation also cut the homestead credit
$51.1 million when in fact a 3.5 percent reduction in the home-
stead credit appropriation would equal $39.4 million. An addi-
tional $11.7 million cut was added to the homestead credit. The
Governor's budget explains that this $11.7 million represents a
3.5 percent cut in the renter credit and circuit breaker programs.
Renters credit and the property tax refund (circuit breaker)
program were not cut, but their share of the cut was added to
the homestead credit program.
QI
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
Governor's Budget Reduction Plan (continued)
Page 3
The net result is that local units of government will be cut
2.6.3 percent more than the 7 percent they had expected. On
a statewide average, instead of being cut,$60.4 million, local
governments are being asked to absorb an additional $15.9 million
cut which the MLC does not deem to be fair or equitable.
The following chart shows.the effects of the Governor's recommenda-
tions on MLC cities.
15 MLC SUBURBS
Total- Coveuiunent Aid And
Hcnestead Credit Reductions Under
The Governor's revised Budget Proposal
• Cuts would be made fon 1986 homestead credit amounts, however, the amrciunt certified
is not yet available, therefore, 1985 homestead credit aid paynents are used is a'
reasonable approximation.
Source: Senate Cc nsel and research
156
February 1986
1985•
Homestead
1986
1986 total
Homestead
Credit
Total Aid 6
Local Aid
Aid Curt
Credit
Cut
Credit Cuts
Bloomington
2,708,609
220,514
2,284,744
203,342
423,856
Brooklyn Park
1,993,175
162,269
1,247,666
111,042
273,311
Burnsville
1,597,171
130,029
1,267,911
112,844
242,873
•
Eagan
315,094
25,652
817,379
72,746
98,399
Fden Prairie
306,875
- 24,983
726,875
64,691
89,675
Fdina
550,444
44,813
936,124
83,315
128,128
Inver Grove Heights
668,734
54,443
514,426
45,783
100,227
Maple Grove
595,761
48,502
874,982
77,873
126,375
Maplewood
1,429,525
116;381
711,559
63,328
179,709
Minnetonka
1,581,580
126,760.
1,286,740
-114,519
243,280
Plynouth
387,414
31,540
875,604
77,928
109,469
Roseville
803,071
65,380
730,075
64,976
130,356
Shoreview
424,905
34,592
368,101
32,761
67,353
White Bear fake
946,081
77,022
462,734
41,183
118,206
Woodbury
480,977
39,157
369,446
32,880
72,038
TOTAL
14,789,416
1,204,037
13,474,366
1,199,211
2,403,255
• Cuts would be made fon 1986 homestead credit amounts, however, the amrciunt certified
is not yet available, therefore, 1985 homestead credit aid paynents are used is a'
reasonable approximation.
Source: Senate Cc nsel and research
156
February 1986
MUNICIPAL Page 4
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION,
MLC Annual Legislative Dinner
More than 90 individuals attended the Third Annual MLC
Legislative Dinner -that was held.January '15 at the Decathlon
Club in Bloomington.
Twenty-two legislators that represent the MLC cities along
with 5.4 MLC city officials were present at this event.The
mayor, city manager and council members from the Cities of
Inver; Grove Heights and Lakeville were guests.
The evening provided an excellent opportunity for local
elected officials to speak with their legislators. It
also provided the Commission the occasion to formally
present MLC's 1986 Legislative Resolutions which have
been summarized in this issue of Update.
The keynote speaker was House Speaker David Jennings, who
outlined the upcoming legislative agenda, focusing his
remarks on the budget shortfall that the State of Minnesota
faces. He acknowledged MLC's concerns regarding the expected
budget cuts and how these cuts could possibly affect their
cities and local government aid. He also reassured the
Commission that he was committed to arriving at an equitable
solution..to the state's _financial problem.,
Following the event, the members of the Commission and the
Legislative Delegation commented that they found the evening
both enjoyable and informative and looked forward to scheduling
similar events in the future.
14
A
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
MLC Board of Directors Adopts 1986 Legislative Resolutions
The MLC Board of Directors adopted the following four legislative
resolutions for the 1986 Session at their board meeting which was
held on January 15:
Local Government Aid Polic
The MLC supports a continuation of the LGA formula
enacted in 1985. It does not support changes to
this formula during the 1986 Session.
Budget Reduction Policy
4 Since the State of Minnesota is currently facing a
budget deficit, the MLC believes that all recipients
of state appropriations should share equally in any
necessary budget cuts. However, the MLC will oppose
any cutbacks which place an excessive amount of
budget reductions on local units of government.
1987 Local Government Aid Appropriation Policy
The MLC resolves that the 1987 Local Government Aid
appropriation amount be increased by at least 68 more
than the 1986 appropriation amount. And if reductions
in 1986 Local Government Aid are necessary, any per-
centage increase for 1987 should be computed on the
restored 1986 base amount.
1986 Legislative Policy
The MLC defines its 1986 legislative program, con-
centrating their efforts on Local Government Aid,
property tax relief programs such as homestead
credit, budget reductions affecting cities, and
other issues which may have fiscal impact on its
membership._
157
MUNICIPAL Page 16
LEGISLATM
COMMISSION
Inver Grove Heights Joins MLC
The MLC is pleased to announce that Inver Grove Heights has
become ,the most recent city to join the Commission_ Inver
Grove Heights' decision to participate in the Commission has
increased MLC membership to currently include 15 municipalities.
Inver Grove Heights shares similar demographic characteristics.
goals and objectives with the other MLC communities, and their
membership will undoubtedly strengthen MLC's voice and impact
on such legislation as to calgovernment aid, tax policy and
other financial issues.
Inver Grove Heights
Profile
City Officials
Mayor:
Council Members:
City Manager:
City Attorney:
Address:
Telephone Number:
William Saed
Bernie Beermann
Ken Henderson
George Tourville
Sid Puppe
Bob Schaefer
Tim Quntz
Inver Grove Heights
8150 Barbara Avenue
Inver Grove' Heights,
612/457-2111
City Government Authority: Statutory
Terms of Office
V-1
LJ
City Hall
East
Minnesota 5507
Mayor:
2 years
Council Members:
4 years____
1986 Population Estimate':
18,940
1986 City Mill Rate:
21.62
Average Assessed Value
Per Capita:
$5,696
1986 LGA:
$668,734
1986 LGA Per Capita:
$35.31
Legislators:
Representative James
Metzen (DFL)
545 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota
55155
612/296-4370
Senator Conrad Vega
(DFL)
G-29 State Capitol
St. Paul, Minnesota
55155
612/296-4101
MUNICIPAL
LEGISLATIVE
COMMISSION
MLC City Manager Becomes
League of Minnesota Cities President
Page 7
James Miller, Minnetonka's City Manager, officially assumed his
position as President of the League of Minnesota Cities' Board
of Directors in January 1986.
Miller acknowledged that his responsibilities during this one-
year term will be demanding, especially during a time when the
State of Minnesota is facing a budget shortfall. Miller called
for the cooperation of government officials on every level to
help resolve this difficult situation in a fair and equitable
manner.
Miller was first elected to serve on the League's Board of
Directors in 1983, and was elected Vice President in June 1985.
`?r Miller has been actively involved in the League for several
years, serving on the League's Personnel Committee, Budget
Committee and on the joint NAHRO-League Industrial Revenue
Bond Task Force.
Miller was one of the chief founders and driving forces behind
the establishment of the Municipal Legislative Commission. He
served as MLC's first Vice .Chair and held this position for two
years. Presently, he is on the Commission's Local Government
Finance Subcommittee and the Development Finance Subcommittee.
Miller sees no conflict of interest regarding his involvement in
both the MLC and the League of Minnesota Cities. He believes
that these organizations compliment each other, and that their
combined efforts increase their effectiveness and help both
organizations achieve their goals.
Miller is also active in other organizations. He is a board
member of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities and
belongs to several national and international city managers'
associations.
Prior to his position as the City Manager of Minnetonka,
Miller was the assistant city manager in Des Moines,Iowa
and Janesville, Wisconsin for three years each. Miller
holds two masters and a doctoral degree in public
administration and taught public administration at
Drake University.
/5q
MUNICIPAL Page 8
LEGISLATM
COMMISSION
MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings Scheduled in March
The MLC Board of Directors unanimously decided to -schedule three
MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings during the 1986 Legislative
Session and invite the MLC Legislative Delegation to participate.
It was the Board's belief that these breakfast meetings be held
in lieu of the "Day at the Legislature" since it would provide
city officials a better opportunity to meet with their legislators
to discuss legislative priorities and issues of concern to their
communities.
In order to create an environment conductive to effective inter-
action and discussion, the MLC cities have been divided into three
smaller regions. Letters will be sent to legislators in the near
future, inviting them to attend the breakfast meeting that
corresponds to the region they represent.
Please note the following MLC Regional Breakfast Meeting Schedules:
EAST REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING
Maplewood, Roseville, Shoreview,
White Bear Lake, Woodbury
Date and Time: Tuesday, March 4 - 7:45 a.m.
Location: Shoreview Plaza Hotel (Hamline Room)
1000 Gramsie Road, Shoreview
(One block north on Lexington, off
of 694, one block east on Gramsie Road)
Representatives: Bennett, Kostohryz, Price, Rose, Stanius,
Valento and Voss.
Senators: Diessner, Dieterich, Hughes, Knaak and
Novak.
MUNICIPAL Page 9
LMISLATI' ,-
COMMISSION
MLC Regional Breakfast Meetings (continued)
NORTHWEST REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING
Brooklyn Park,
Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth
Date and Time: Wednesday, March 5 - 7:45 a.m.
Location: Plymouth Radisson Inn (Goldflower Room A)
2705"N6rth Annapolis Lane, Plymouth
(Corner of 494 -and 55)
Representatives: Clausnitzer, Ellingson, Heap, Knickerbocker,
Olsen, Scheid, Schreiber and Shaver.
Senators: Jude, Luther, McQuaid, Olson and Ramstad.
SOUTHWEST REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING
Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan,
Eden Prairie, Edina, Inver Grove Heights
Date and Time: Wednesday, March 12 - 7:45 a.m.
Location: Decathlon Club (Javelin Room)
7800 Cedar Avenue South, Bloomington
(Off of 494, take the Portland/12th Avenue
Exit)
.Representatives: Blatz, Forsythe, Halberg, Himle, Knickerbocker;
Metzen, Pauly, Riveness and Seaberg.
Senators: Belanger, Freeman, Knutson, Olson,, Storm and
Vega.
MUNICIPAL
COMMISSION
MLC Facts
MLC LEGISLATIVE DELEGATION
7 DFL State Representatives
16 IR State Representatives
8 DFL State Senators
7 IR State Senators
38 MLC State Legislators Total
/6 v