Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03/19/1986 - City Council Regular
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 19, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Joint Powers Agreement - Regional Mutual Aid Association 2. Beecher Drive Street Surfacing 3. Project 428, Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer, Final Assessment Roll Adjustment • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 17, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINTSTRATIVE AGENDA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Joint Powers Agreement - Regional Mutual Aid Association --Recently, 28 metropolitan communities and one county have joined forces and created a Regional Mutual Aid Association (RMAA) with the establishment of a related constitution, bylaws and joint powers agreement which was executed by each participant agency. The purpose of this association is to provide public • works related assistance to each other during a declared emergency, to exchange ideas relating to equipment and methods of dealing with emergencies and to protect the lives and property of respective areas in the case of any declared emergency or disaster. This association is similar to mutual aid agreements that the City currently has with its Police and Fire Departments with neighboring communities. The annual dues for membership is $10 per year. The only other costs that would be incurred by the City would be the donation of equipment time and manpower in response to request assistance. Our operational costs (fuel, repair, etc.) is the responsibility of the requesting agency. Other communities close to Eagan who belong to this organization are: Bloomington, R'ichfield', Burnsville, Savage, and Apple Valley. The Public Works Director will be encouraging our other neighboring communities of Rosemount, Inver Grove Heights and • Mendota Heights to also join this association. The Public Works Director will be able to discuss in further detail any questions the Council may have pertaining t this request at the meeting on the 19th. Enclosed on page is a resolution that is requested to be approved by Counc' action regarding this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the joint powers agreement for the Regional Mutual Aid Association and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 2. Beecher Drive Street Surfacing --Enclosed on page is a copy of a letter that the Public Works Director rece ed from a resident within the Eden Addition who has registered a complaint regarding the condition of the unimproved portion of Beecher Drive from Blackhawk Road through the intersection with Walnut Lane. As the Council is aware, Beecher Drive is a gravel road that was turned down for street improvements approximately 8 17� years ago. Since that time, the Eden Addition was developed taking its primary access from Blackhawk Road along a small portion of the unimproved Beecher Drive. With this connection to the Woodgate Addition to the east and the recent improvements to Blackhawk Road and completion of I -35E, this main entrance to the Eden Addition receives an ever increasing amount of traffic along this gravel road portion. Our Maintenance Department has a difficult time maintaining this in an acceptable surface condition especially during the spring pot hole season. See page for a copy of the map referencing this location. Therefore, the Public Works Department would like direction from Council as to whether the City Maintenance Division should proceed with one of the following options: 1) Install a minimum thickness bituminous service through 40 the intersection. 2) Initiate a public improvement process to upgrade that portion of Beecher Drive to a standard city street through the intersection of Walnut Lane and assess Lot 6, Block 2, Clearview Addition for the benefits received. 3) Perform #2 above at City expense. 4) Continue to maintain existing condition as best as possible. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide the appropriate direction to the Public Works Department in response to complaints received pertaining to Beecher Drive intersection with Walnut Lane. Item 3. Project 428, Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer, Final Assessment Roll Adjustment --On March 4, 1986, the final assessment hearing was held for the above referenced project with the final assessment roll being adopted as presented with one exception. After the close of that public hearing, Mr. Jerome Utecht represented by his son Leo- submitted a written objection pertaining to Parcel 10-01700-010-53. At that time, the staff felt that the present senior citizen deferment policy would have addressed the concerns of Mr. Utecht. Therefore, the assessment roll was adopted as originally proposed for this particular parcel. Since that time, Public Works Director has been in contact with Mr. Utech,t's attorney, Robert J. Travers, who has indicated their intent to proceed with a formal appeal based on their contention of lack of benefit. Therefore, in anticipation of this formal appeal, it is recommended that the Council revise the assessment roll adopted on March 4 to remove Parcel 10-01700-01-53 owned by Mr. Jerome Utecht, and to continue it for further review and consideration through the Special Assessment Committee process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:Amend the final assessment roll for Project 428 (Cedar Industrial .P'ark - Trunk Storm Sewer,) to omit Parcel 10-01700-010-53 (Jerome'U,techt) and to forward this parcel to the Special Assessment Committee for review and recommendation by Council at a later date. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH:jh • • i7% Ll • RESOLUTION JOINT/COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (PUBLIC WORKS PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT) REGIONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION WHEREAS,the City of Eagan desires to become a member of the Regional Mutual Aid Association and its Director of Public Works as its authorized representative and Superintendent of Streets/Equipment its alternative representative; and WHEREAS, a mutual need exists between members of the Regional Mutual Aid Association to share and assist one another in the areas of declared emergencies, disaster control and litigation; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan considers it to be in the best interests of the City to enter into a mutual agreement with the other members of the Regional Mutual Aid Association; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan hereby authorizes the execution of a joint and cooperative agreement with the Regional Mutual Aid Association and hereby authorizes its Director of Public Works to represent the City of Eagan in this association and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said agreement in behalf of the City of Eagan. ATTEST: By: E.J. Van Overbeke, Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By: Beatta Blomquist, Mayor /7e TV ci z `iEC�I`,'t--fl ?e, p � � Sn�:,� ISIS ( � � �M.�•�.2cQ. 1�� � rn., � l.� �^ w u," � r�..a.,-,..R' c�.�u-w-�� tl,�.-�-� �.n.u--G-(s-„� • TOLL'a CJ O G Yla�_ p ,4j /) _A °, law' ,_ (, ^ �-V--t�c�Y.�, ✓W "V� �-�� ,�v , pj TA, 10 R�,t S. w i...-'4 LACY, a'AW ROAD.._ .,.._"' a .D. ]D.ae° rrliD ND DDDy in -ea xaD 'f •Dxa poem •••i `Sr\ y. pJ• q •,•O O.P T. PS_I "u y m ' � � I m - _ •,�� a �`' � o � 4 �3q �, R4NSpORT4 •� T V m y '� •• J C " ;ow. /CHT O ] • ,r � A K'Du • yrs 9 n' .'�. R 1]D MOx,N y �• ",H � 4y � F Y 9� r � m w •fin . L� t. w • J JJ � N e • • wy � y � Y• m �{ I, \ ,A 1 • m - � C°^� �ct �F �i—.!`—)�.; 1 w �{ � � - F ° — � c .i • •fin � � J J^ � \ a`/ •i.�'GDvv� o•Nv✓ / p1 /o", � m j • • ` ii �-'N �s'9ai'��Pra� l,, r✓s' gwG 1 L : Jwaa� a e'� �4/ �m N �r'r.e "�•'��.,".1:I __ __.a�e �'� uW• • �B I `---' _S, io.�a. e wwo�,.: w 1,00 r 4 ^, 4 O i or r•N m. . • j A O ..G," 111 �' o . � r`.• �• � 7 '" nm � ' �• d � '" ;CLOVER LANE a C` ] p e m f iLFef 11paTrr C� I'••i- , + •i �, %•.c ! _ Q �'�'"- CLOVER LANE m e.r - •r y ' iZul �miam 6 ��S `un i'� w"• tl `Sr , •� —• bd ry _ i m s •n•f s ,rt nt r7 .� y I �; t •wb % II[' S y i{Y �.• axy e � 6 � n i � • y • a 6 ZIIAG 211.76 Ir J m ' " -� s.o ie.i •. me.,o___ _ _.mDR rmn-.. I :. -"'en _ m ._� oiau-- �Ja sG ima e.n w.DD n.or w.00. . � � �� _ •e.,• ���' .`." E_L mn r.r. 'r��a e1' i � 4 e m 3 � "•i' Q 4a• !D �c ``�r ae. p a•s�Jd' � m � m e• w y• lJ�e � � y • i n D•. }9,'FrE� •o L • F . OB •�S + 4 e ''i^ a {il'ft ` +' G m ia + .,I a�J er m S e t • • _ e )) m. aM'n .. O O O •� �1 _-.rr, ' i4y e. a e.a'ae' u�amne'° 1er •fd uw • `pNFR�i4.4.x v i� m' ' BVI I aG f ✓b� n"rxe,r^� n mw , \.N� .,�, X... 1 8 -•E �. ° ; J G, REGULAR MEETING AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL FAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS n 1,A-S3A. Public Hearing, Project 467, Wescott Road (Streets & Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS a u\A, Tollefson Builders for Review & Consideration of Contractor's r, License Suspension (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) W5B. Special Permit (Burton & Mayone Eppen) to Allow a Nursery School Cd for No More Than 10 Students Located at 1658 Woodgate Lane, Lot .12, Block 1, Mallard Park, Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 28 (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS ('9.1 A. Fire Department /-.S D. Public Works Department VvyI B. Police Department 1MSE. Cable Commission Rei. C. Parks & Recreation Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA A. Contractors Licenses 9 B. Personnel Items 1rjo C. P Vacate Tot Lot Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Briar Hill 4th Addition) D. Vacate Trail Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing \e�10 \ (Briar Hill 4th Addition) E. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing �r,\\ JJ (Brittany 7th Addition) oq \2 F. Contract 86-1, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids �( (1986 Spring Parks Construction Project) \1 6\--90N-G. City Contract, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Park Shelter Buildings) \5'r7H. Final Plat Approval, Windtree 5th & 6th Additions (Richardson q Properties) Final Plat Approval, Joseph A. Spande 1st Addition (Roy Spande) �•..-mJ. Project 469, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Towerview Road - Streets) P6j.1AK. Project 470, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Greensboro Addition - Streets & Utilities) �•�3L. Project 471, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer Lateral) �3 M. Contract 84-B, Berkshire Ponds (Streets & Utilities) Final Acceptance V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS n 1,A-S3A. Public Hearing, Project 467, Wescott Road (Streets & Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS a u\A, Tollefson Builders for Review & Consideration of Contractor's r, License Suspension (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) W5B. Special Permit (Burton & Mayone Eppen) to Allow a Nursery School Cd for No More Than 10 Students Located at 1658 Woodgate Lane, Lot .12, Block 1, Mallard Park, Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 28 (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) OLD BUSINESS (Continued) ySIG C. Street Name Designation, I -35E & Deerwood Drive Frontage Road (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) D. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission VII. NEW BUSINESS Idrl �oS A. Preliminary Plat (Northwestern Mututal Life Insurance Company) TS for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition for 6 Lots on Approximately 23 Acres & a Rezoning from NB (Neighborhood Business), GB (General Business) & R-4 (Multiple) to Commercial Planned Development Located South of Lone Oak Rd. & West of I - 3 5E, NW 1/2 of Sec. 10 ECFV B. Preliminary Plat (Park Knoll Addition - Tri-Land)for 15 Single - Family Lots on 6.6 Acres & a Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 (Single Family) Located on Outlot B, Oakwood Hts. Add. North of \ y\ Wilderness Run Rd., SE 1/4 of Section 26 r�0.' C. Conditional Use Permit (Burger King Corporation) for a Pylon Sign & Drive-Thru Restaurant Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition, Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Roads, NW 1/4 , \�$ of Sec. 15 Conditional Use Permit (Federal Land Company) for a 20'`Pylon Sign on,Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, Cliff Rd. & Nicols Rd., SE 1/4 of Sec. 30 - E. Conditional Use Permit & Variance (Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc.) V3(o for a Four Gas Pump Island with Canopy Added to Existing Convenience Store on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Addition, Pilot Knob & Yankee Doodle Rd. & Pilot Knob Rd., NE 1/4 of Sec. 16 F. Consideration of Amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use 1� V!:R Regulations, Section 11.20, Annual Review and Termination 1� p -G. Temporary Advertising Sign for Dallas Development lst Addition To Be Located on Applicant's Property at Silver Bell Rd. and J f Highway 13 �j %d�4.I Consideration of Request to Amend Off -Sale Liquor License Policy M. G. Astleford for Request to Review Expenses Relating to the CTC Business Campus Development Agreement 2� \5-�5 'J. Star City Recertification VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS b'0 X57 A. Consideration of Reinstatement of Unchanged Preliminary Plat (Herb Bergstrom) for Blackhawk Acres, West of Blackhawk Road & (,j.k(,,2Adjacent to Robin Lane, SE 1/4 of Sec. 17 B. Contract 86-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Windtree 5th & 6th Additions ) Contract 86-7, Receive Bids/Award Contract (O'Neil's Ponds Storm Sewer) �S- D. Approve Final Plat, Brittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) Flo �O E. Contract 86-4, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids �.\� 11 (Brittany 9th Addition) I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD X. ADJOURNMENT I MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 13, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the March 19, 1986, agenda 'and regular City Council meeting minutes for the March 4 and special minutes for March 11 meetings, the following items are in order for consideration: A. FIRE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. B. POLICE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered for the Parks -& Recreation Department at this time. D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Greensboro Addition - Revised Preliminary Plat --At the February 18th Council meeting, the Council approved the preliminary plat for the Greensboro Addition (page 3 ) located north of Wescott Road and south of Carriage Hills Golf Course. Subject to that preliminary plat approval, the developer petitioned for the installation of public improvements and would like to proceed with the development of this subdivision in the very near future. However, the developer (Gabbert Development Inc.) wants to develop this subdivision in phases with the first phase consisting of approximately 30 lots. The Public Works Department has informed the developer that any phased development must provide for the looping of the necessary streets and utilities to eliminate any "dead end" situations.. Due to the developers financial constraints on the number of lots for the first phase and the location of the installation of required utilities, the developer has requested consideration for a revision to the previously approved preliminary plat as shown on page_ Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ITEM 1. CONTINUED Before the City proceeds with the detailed feasibility report and simultaneous preparation of plans and specifications, we want to. be assured that there are no objections to the proposed configuration revision of the previously approved preliminary plat. plat_ The staff will be reviewing the details of the proposed revisions to insure that all lot size and frontage requirements will be met as originally required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the revised preliminary plat configuration for the Greensboro Addition. N. 0 5 LEX1NG70N PLACE SOUTH PROPOSED STREETS 010-e0 9 ro Z3 ,V STREET LEXINGTON — SOUARE GREENSBORO ADDITION STREETS PROJECT No. 470 EAGAN, MINNESOTA o md :od 3w a«u, 010-s1 010-01 BONESTROO, RQSENE. ANDER 11[ 8 A880ClATES. INC. Coneylting Engineer& 8L Paul Minn. Date: MAR CONIUL 4937867.FIS- No. 4 `, /�//. IVA I I I---- D- +"•3 ----_j I I �M I I o md :od 3w a«u, 010-s1 010-01 BONESTROO, RQSENE. ANDER 11[ 8 A880ClATES. INC. Coneylting Engineer& 8L Paul Minn. Date: MAR CONIUL 4937867.FIS- No. 4 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three PUBLIC 'WORKS DEPARTMENT (Continued) Item 2. Water Distribution System - Energy Study --The Public Works Director and Superinte.ndent of Utilities have been evaluating our water supply and distribution system since the recent completion of the water treatment plant, modification to several wells and the construction of the additional booster station on Lexington Avenue. Due to the fact that several power users in our distribution and supply system are scattered throughout the city in different power supply zones _.(NSP and DEA), combined with the varying rate structures for peak versus off-peak use and pending rate increases, it is highly recommended that a comprehensive detail energy use study be performed on our system to maximize efficiency and power cost savings. We have been working with a firm called Triangle Engineering, Inc., that was formulated by two individuals who presently work with the City of St. Paul Water Department who have prepared an energy evaluation software program specifically for municipal applications. The Public Works Director has received a formal proposal to perform this analysis on our system for cost of $14,500.00 which is fully guaranteed. If the City does not recognize a cost savings of at least this amount in its first year of implementation, it is 1008 refundable. A preliminary review of our system and the implementation of this program indicates that the City could save approximately $40,000.00 to $50,00.0.0'0 annually which is approximately 208 of our present energy cost. Therefore, the Staff is requesting, authorization to hire Triangle Engineering to perform this energy audit study during 1986. ACTION'TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the hiring of • Triangle Engineering, Inc. to perform a water system management energy study for cost of $14,500 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. E. CABLE COMMISSION There are no items at this time. to be considered under Cable 91 Commission Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four -'CONSENT" AGENDA There are thirteen ( 13 ) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on pagesd � is a list of contrac- tors who are renewing or .who have beep selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references • from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor licenses as presented. P TRACTORS LICENSES MARCH 19, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. A PLUS REALTY, INC 2. BARSNESS CONSTRUCTION 7 3. BLILIE CONSTRUCTION CO 4. BURR OAK BUILDERS INC 5. CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION INC 6. DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION 7. DUANE J BUILDERS INC ® 8. FML INC 9. GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT 10. HAM MAR ENTERPRISES INC 11. JAMESON BUILDERS 12. JOHNSON-REILAND CONSTRUCTION INC 13. KEYLAND HOMES 14. OZMUN-PEDERSON INC 15. PANELCRAFT OF MN 16. BILL RICHIE SIS MAINTENANCE ® 17. ROSEWOOD CONTRUCTION INC 18. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 19. SONS CONSTRUCTION CO 20. U.S. HOMES CORP 21. VALLEY INVESTMENT CONSTRUCTION 22. ZACHMAN BROS CONSTRUCTION MASONRY, CEMENT WORK 1. FIGG MASONRY 7 WATER SOFTENER 1. COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER 2. DONAHUE MECHANICAL INC HEATING/VENTILATING 1. AIR COMFORT INC 2. ARNESON HEATING 3. CENTRAL HEATING & A/C 4. DOMESTIC MECHANICAL 5. GOLDEN VALLEY HTG & A/C 6. HORWITZ INC 7. J & B SHEETMETAL INC 8. NORTHERN PLUMBING & HTG 9. SBS MECHANICAL 10. GEORGE SEDGWICK HTG & A/C PLUMBERS - 1. DONAHUE MECHANICAL INC 2. EAGAN PLUMBING 3. HORWITZ INC 4. MAPLEWOOD SEWER & WATER INC 5. .METROPOLITAN MECHICANICAL CONTRACTORS 6. SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING 7. LEE STULL PLUMBING Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items --There are four (4) Personnel Items to be given consideration. Item 1. Administrative Intern --An Administrative Intern position for Administration was approved in the 1986 Budget. After screen- ing six applications, four applicants were interviewed by City Administrator Hedges. Presently, reference checks are being conducted on these four applicants. The City Administrator will furnish the Council with a name to be considered for this position either on the Administrative Agenda or at the City Council meeting on Wednesday, March 19. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of an Administrative Intern for Administration for a six-month period in 1986. Item 2. Parks Maintenance Worker --An additional Parks Maintenance Worker was approved in 1986 Budget. The Parks Department would like to know fill this vacancy. Authorization is needed to advertise for and to fill the vacant Parks Maintenance Worker position. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement for a Parks Maintenance Worker. Item 3. Road Maintenance Worker --Over 250 applications were received by the City for this vacancy. After screening all those applications, 30 applicants were invited to the Eagan • Municipal Center to take a written test. From these 30, five applicants were interviewed by Street Superintendent Erhart, Street Supervisor Lundsten and Administrative Assistant Duffy. Their recommendation for filling this vacancy will be included in the Administrative Packet on Monday. The hiring of this applicant would be contingent upon successful completion fo the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of staff's recommended candidate for the Road Maintenance Worker vacancy, contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. a Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six VACATE TOT LOT EASEMENT/BRIAR HILL FOURTH ADDITION C. Vacate Tot Lot Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Briar Hill 4th Addition) --we have received a petition to vacate a portion of Lot 15, Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition that encroaches into the existing 50 -foot -wide tot lot easement dedi- cated by separate deed document with the Briar Hill 4th Addition. Preliminary review by staff indicates that this encroachment and subsequent vacation of the related easement would not compromise the integrity or ultimate,use of this easement for tot lot purposes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and schedule a public hearing to be held April 15th for the vacation of a portion of the tot lot easement over Lot 15, Block • 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition. VACATE TRAIL EASEMENT/BRIAR HILL 4TH ADDITION D. Vacate Trail Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Briar Hill 4th Addition) --We have received a petition to vacate the trailway easement presently dedicated over the common lot line of Lots 29, 30, 31 and 32, of Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition. This .trailway easement along this lot line runs through an existing four-plex dwelling unit. In consideration of vacating this 10 -foot -wide trailway easement, the staff will be requesting a similar trailway easement dedication along the northerly lot lines of Lots 29 and 30. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and schedule the public hearing to be held on April 15,; 1986, for .the vacation of a trailway easement over Lots 29-32, Block 1, of Briar Hill 4th Addition. /0 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven VACATE, UTILITY EASEMENT/BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION E. VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT', RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION) --On February 4th, the Council held a public hearing to discuss the vacation of a portion of a sanitary sewer utility line easement over Lot 5, Block 2, of the Brittany 7th Addition, resulting from a three-foot encroachment of the dwelling unit on that lot. At that public hearing, there was considerable concern expressed by the Council regarding this encroachment and the resulting liability that might be assumed by the City if this encroachment were allowed and partial easement vacation approved. Since that time, the staff has worked with the developer/petitioner in initiating the City required soil correction work necessary to minimize the future City. liability related with this vacation approval. With this soil correction work recently being initiated, the developer 'has repetitioned for consideration for the vacation of a portion of this easement to allow the encroachment of the dwelling unit. This vacation is necessary before the City will perform the final inspection and allow occupancy to occur. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To receive the petition to vacate a portion of the utility easement for Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition and schedule the public hearing to be held April 15, 1986. • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight CONTRACT 8'6-1/SPRING PARKS CONSTRUCTION F. Contract 86-1, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1986 Spring Parks Construction --The Director of Parks & Recreation presented final plans for the improvement of five (5) parks that are scheduled as a part of the 1986 parks construc- tion program. These plans were presented at a special City Council meeting held on March 11, 1986. Those parks that are proposed for improvement are Meadowlands Park, Blue Cross Park, Pilot Knob Park, South Oaks .Park and Quarry Park. The detailed cost analysis will be prepared and distributed as a part of the Administrative Packet for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and authorize advertisement for bids with a bid opening on April 12, 1986. CONTRACT 86-9/FOR PARK SHELTER BUILDINGS G. City Contract 86-9, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids for Park Shelter Buildings --The plans for five (5) park shelter buildings were reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Director at a Special City Council meeting on March 11, 1986.. Upon review it was determined that the plans and specifications and advertisement for bids would be in order for consideration at the March 19 City Council meeting. For -a copy of the park shelter building/construction financing refer to a memo that was prepared by the Director of Parks and Recreation and distribu- ted at the Special City C uncil meeting. This memo is enclosed on pages __1-3through 1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans • and specifications and authorize and advertisement for bids with an opening on April 12, 1986. /Z..' of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL Coonoil Members THOMAS. HEDGES Gty P rn neuww FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk DATE: MARCH 11, 1986 RE: PARK SHELTER BUILDING - FINANCING The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission has been reviewing the Park Shelter Building program, and at the February 6 Commission Meeting approved and recommended the following budget and financing plan: PARK SHELTER BUILDING PROJECTED COST Trapp Farm Park Pavilion $106,000.00 Trapp Farm Shelter 82,000.00 Goat Hill 96,000.00 Rahn 57,000.00 Northview 91,000.00 TOTAL $432,000.00 Contingency +30,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $462,000.00 The City staff and architect have carefully reviewed the cost projections and are reasonably comfortable with these figures. A contingency of approximately 7% or $30,000 has been added to cover possible revisions and cost increases in materials between the time that these estimates were prepared and final bidding. FINIANCING Cost to cover the construction program has been funded through the Park Bond and Park Site Fund as follows: Park Bond Fund Park Site Fund $318,000.00 1447000.00• $462,000.00 °Includes Contingency /3 THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY o. e TIME LIRE: Staff has scheduled a meeting with the architects for this Friday, March 14, to review final plans and specifications. Assuming City Council concurrence with the revised Goat Hill Shelter, and minor or minimal changes at the staff review on Friday; the council will be presented with a request to go out for bids at the City Council Meeting, March 19, with a bid opening for April 12th, and a bid award April 15th. (Tentative) KV/bls • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page ,Nine FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/WINDTREE 5TH & 6TH ADDITIONS H. Final Plat Approval, Windtree 5th & 6t,h Additions (Richardson Properties) --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Windtree 5th & 6th Additions located north of Wescott Road and east of Elrene Road as shown on pages %1a/ % All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on November 5, 1985 have been complied with satisfactorily. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. 15 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Windtree 5th and 6th Additions and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents, 15 ® EXHIBIT "A" W I N D T R E E ,..5TH aD I ., ra+D.I, Fe I...:... I: :iu �.8 \' �•I iA L. IO e` •\.v��J .w.. i--. la 9 ,� . •D . . Ie II �'� FY C\'�•Il. �. (ri ee .D tl 19 Y U: • io lai I\ yp � F -�1 Fro ;r ,. ... P IIIc. Vlarwlr Y Ii IIITI .'� RON KRUEGER AND ASSOCIATES Lm .D. pmu a.uu.ra ra+D.I, ear n... I...:... I: :iu e1J ,,. 1 Grp• f ::i:: ':i" : •:1.11., ::�`: �: :�: ui.: : ulna ua TI: Y. m. u.re..v.•.. ..a .I•o-l.. c.... W. ........ Wr ... .nl• ...e..n: v I p 0p u L0p 1 e Daup,L. lep• nW u•[el 1 1„ • 11•w I.w m•WL•1 ur u0 •A•L.D .l r •D"1111.. m0111p1 a u.Wm 10'rIL1DI •n l• a11•'LI' I'D, 1AII.I.T. Ill 11 D 1`'I• "IT. 1•, nu ala :D.eu: L..a•DD•.unn .wD W LIT A D D I T ION L•. rel le.r Y ur•er l• a Vr, rL• •1•u•r•u r, ua [• ,r, • W,nL•, eL.a, nl nlnn•,sr. rn .1•r ' • I .rl r.r .1 IDIt $119 .1 0.tlll c11. w:a1•r ..1/ 11 II.DTIEK l.. � r+ . v1.L. le.r. u...•. c. r•..Iv,..u•..,+ Ir v ..n • ...c ::r 'd I...:... I: :iu e1J ,,. 1 Grp• f ::i:: ':i" : •:1.11., ::�`: �: :�: : I—. ........ .1 ....niu. .a u....., n• 11.1 .1 .eu .1.DTIL.+:•: ADDur W. .,. ...r. a.. .u., . L. ,.. Y. m. u.re..v.•.. ..a .I•o-l.. c.... W. ........ Wr ... .nl• ...e..n: v .....n. D. .ID... 'u er w rur r .lour m+ lu urwrm u:l.. .0 l..e . —_ • —__�_ _ ------ - -----RECEIVCD FEB 2 0 1936 "In..r•u.nl � o.l.u..+ ou +.l el_ 1 D• .I uce.rp.v. •r.Y rLl...'Inc.• . D.....�(:•V.r rl. .n TiF�l l•er.l•. c.r Po•:[Ien— ;1.. :':L:... CP:.J. :::: .. J Y .., .W.. ,n... ...n....Yl•' .L..,.J ., , L ... .......... .r Yy1�• _- a.n...L...a.. v::.1....... 11.1:a .vol..... unl °"• • e. m.. .. A _ r r,.0 L. ......... ::: =�.�i ..r.D• ..rr l• rl•.r .n ....I.. [..ncll .r . n..r.....L.. ....J ..1.clmll ra..u.e. Le fn•nn m, u.. .1 nm.....r.dnl. ul• rl..... .... •rw".:TGi+.I .....r .. _F., r.. I..J u..c.l D.e w• •.I• WL., .. -01-1 I•• npDlllu. rr nu Jnlrna. v, u... J.....J ,rr....l.i ...uuu , • • 0 u. [cool •.'.In r� •Irnii I-In:ii::ini .na ... J.1. r..er..0 In I... ..car r J SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/JOSEPH A. SPANDE 1ST ADDITION I. Final Plat Approval, Joseph A.,Spande 1st Addition (Roy Spande)- We have received an application for final plat approval for the subdivision of the existing large lot located at the southeast corner of Ridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue as shown on page All conditions of the preliminary plat approval by Coil action on. August 20, 1985 have been complied with satis- factorily. All final plat application materials have been submit- ted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Joseph A. Spande lst Addition and authorize Ehe Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. R EXHIBIT "A" • JOSEPH A. SPANDE I ST 1• y li�'�Eeo 8. • ;F� B ^`L•....' i i • FR NORTH 2 +• Ec CEPT°M•...... ..... 6d? 9, � • \_ - p+'nr a ..: ".: NO rµ,` \ e.e �4 � r /_ 1 ' °•.�n„'.�t.� 1._. 1 [n .rrl. . � 3�. S -I1N 9619 .troll. �•° I. . Inn —.1 tl DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC. LOCATION MAP m] M t 9 c sc..a ADDITION - �7rS Y Tm: b:. Il . - - -- _ - - - oss n..a nm,v . --.....: ,:...[ .. n ...w..'F:.c .t,le� � x•., _ ._ n_ar. .. [e..—f.. ['1. � E., [ - . .11 lr�mr,r roc 1 a[1. a. w cwl.u..n [�..tvun [.. o. ••I.0 [.. n r. l.a.,wn [n ro .[t Ilio. °e .ut 1.+... 1 o. 1+. 1.n.ol— sw.e:v•. e.-[ce:.:. ....c.w. Lc t. rnn . ... a..+w c.luh vat ... t[. GeV or . 19_/n. ]L. ..xl, of ) _. oI . .. Cin..0 lu� t t. CIv°we :1.. !....r •1,n.uw. Iv). .. ".I ,. Vu I. �,. ntw ... .. v I9—S.. ! .— m I.. pI., u . Aa l,..11 tnu _eq o I- .... n.'...I I... nw .,e l..n..l If . 1._, . F.e. • [..Im. n_[. _.[ 1-+ mo. ..[ �.n pool ..m -x ...,n... lot. :.+v. non...[. L � L /1 a Iln.. m 1.. DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC. LOCATION MAP m] M t 9 c sc..a ADDITION - �7rS Y Tm: b:. Il . - - -- _ - - - oss n..a nm,v . --.....: ,:...[ .. n ...w..'F:.c .t,le� � x•., _ ._ n_ar. .. [e..—f.. ['1. � E., [ - . .11 lr�mr,r roc 1 a[1. a. w cwl.u..n [�..tvun [.. o. ••I.0 [.. n r. l.a.,wn [n ro .[t Ilio. °e .ut 1.+... 1 o. 1+. 1.n.ol— sw.e:v•. e.-[ce:.:. ....c.w. Lc t. rnn . ... a..+w c.luh vat ... t[. GeV or . 19_/n. ]L. ..xl, of ) _. oI . .. Cin..0 lu� t t. CIv°we :1.. !....r •1,n.uw. Iv). .. ".I ,. Vu I. �,. ntw ... .. v I9—S.. ! .— m I.. pI., u . Aa l,..11 tnu _eq o I- .... n.'...I I... nw .,e l..n..l If . 1._, . F.e. • [..Im. n_[. _.[ 1-+ mo. ..[ �.n pool ..m -x ...,n... lot. :.+v. non...[. L i DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC. LOCATION MAP m] M t 9 c sc..a ADDITION - �7rS Y Tm: b:. Il . - - -- _ - - - oss n..a nm,v . --.....: ,:...[ .. n ...w..'F:.c .t,le� � x•., _ ._ n_ar. .. [e..—f.. ['1. � E., [ - . .11 lr�mr,r roc 1 a[1. a. w cwl.u..n [�..tvun [.. o. ••I.0 [.. n r. l.a.,wn [n ro .[t Ilio. °e .ut 1.+... 1 o. 1+. 1.n.ol— sw.e:v•. e.-[ce:.:. ....c.w. Lc t. rnn . ... a..+w c.luh vat ... t[. GeV or . 19_/n. ]L. ..xl, of ) _. oI . .. Cin..0 lu� t t. CIv°we :1.. !....r •1,n.uw. Iv). .. ".I ,. Vu I. �,. ntw ... .. v I9—S.. ! .— m I.. pI., u . Aa l,..11 tnu _eq o I- .... n.'...I I... nw .,e l..n..l If . 1._, . F.e. • [..Im. n_[. _.[ 1-+ mo. ..[ �.n pool ..m -x ...,n... lot. :.+v. non...[. Agenda Information Memo March 19., 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven PROJECT 469, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING J. Project 469, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Towerview Road - Streets) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the Lemay Lake Hills Addition (Martin Shields Property), the Council authorized the preparation of a 'feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scedul'ing a public hearing to discuss these proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the feasibility report for Project 469 (Towerview Road - Streets) and order the public hearing to be held April 15, 1986. • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 470, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING K. Project 470, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Greensboro Addition - Streets & Utilities) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer for the proposed Greensboro Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of the feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to discuss these proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 470, Greensboro Addition (Streets and Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held April 15, 1986. • • a/ • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen PROJECT 471, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING L_ Project 471, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (West Service Drive - Lateral Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition received from Northwestern Mutual Life Inusrance Company, the Council authorized appropriation of a feasibility, report which is now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to discuss the proposed installation of lateral storm sewer facilities to handle the future development of several lots within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 471, (West Service Drive Lateral Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 15,•1986. M Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meet-ing Page Fourteen CONTRACT 84-B., BERKSHIRE PONDS/FINAL ACCEPTANCE M. Contract 84-B, Berkshire Ponds (Streets & Utilities)/Final. Acceptance --The installation of streets and' utilities necessary to service the Berkshire Ponds Addition was installed privately by the developer in accordance with City approved plans & specifi- cations. All final inspections have been performed by repre- sentatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM,: Accept Berkshire Ponds (Streets & Utilities) for maintenance. Contract 84-B, perpetual City 0 • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 196'6, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PUBLIC HEARING/PROJECT 467, WESCOTT ROAD (STREETS & UTILITIES) A. Public Hearing, Project 467, Wescott Road (Street & Utilities)— In response to a petition submitted by the developers of the Greensboro Addition (Gabbert Development) and the Lexington Square 2nd Addition (Northland Mortgage Company), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to discuss the proposed upgrading of Wescott Road from Lexington Avenue to one-half mile east. This feasibility report was completed and forwarded to the Council on February 18 with the Public Hearing being scheduled for March 19. Enclosed on pages • 2 through T3 is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information ,and review during the Public Hearing. The Public Works Director and Consulting Engineer will be available to discuss in further detail the improvements proposed under this project. is All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 467, Wescott Road (Streets & Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. ON WESCOTT ROAD ® (LEXINGTON AVENUE TO 1/2 MILE EAST* UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 467 FOR ® EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49381 can" 4-W9, is e'a a� ook, /JOKE, 04� , 4 . I & 4 r nKC. Clean A. Gooch P.E. '`/ LNJL/Y_/_N/MLL J A'rirF A. Gordon, P.E. Oua G, Bnnaunn. P, E Thomas E. Noyes. P, E. e0 Nnhr.r R', Na vnr, P.F. Riehard W. Faster. P.E. lmrph C And -0. P.E. Rabrn G. Sahar,lhl. P.E. 1335 '7U. i+...d o4q, ..ry 36 11.o.0a..I A. I n,h,,, P.E. Marvin L. Soroala, P.E. NirhurJ E. Tuinrr, P.E. Donald C. Bugordr, P.E. Af ....& 55113 J. ,v, C. 0A.o, P.E, Jury A. Bou.dan, P.E. oda..: 612 -636-4600 Musk A. Hamm, PE. T,d A'- Field, P.E. Miehael T Rourmann. P.E. Rohrer R. P1e1f d,,, P.E January 10, 1986 David O. Loskam PE Charles A. Erirksan Le. M. Pawalska Matto M. Olson Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Wescott Road (Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile east) - Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 467 File No. 49381 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed is our report for Wescott Road (Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile east), Project No. 467. This report covers utility and street improvements and in— cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark( A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson �.' Date: January 10, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved b'."�'�"-`..•'.-'1,,,� PP by:,,. Department of P&blic Works Date • 20 z b% - 2848d 74 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of Wescott Road from Lex- ington Avenue easterly approximately 1/2 mile. Also included is the construc- tion of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer. Wescott Road is abutted by. Lexington Square Addition and an unplatted, undeveloped parcel to the south. To the north it is abutted by the proposed Greensboro -Addition, 3 large unplatted but homesteaded parcels and a large platted undeveloped parcel within Williams and Larue Addition. Wescott Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street in the City of Eagan. Therefore the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance ® with Municipal State Aid standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT for the re- view and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as out'lined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein .includes extending the trunk sanitary sewer in Wescott Road which is presently under contract as part of Project No. 433, Lexington Square 2nd Addition.: The 12" diameter trunk sani- tary sewer is anticipated being completed in the spring of 1986. Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to extend the sanitary sewer easterly in Wescott Road as a 10" diameter pipe to the proposed easterly north -south street in the proposed Greensboro Addition (Parcel 010-51, Section 14). The sanitary sewer will continue easterly as an 8" diameter pipe to the east line of Greensboro Addition. Two 8" diameter stubs will be constructed northerly to serve Greensboro Addition. Page 1. 2848d �J Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a12" diameter trunk water main in Wescott Road. The 12" trunk main will connect to the 12" trunk main proposed as part Project No. 450, Williams and Larue 1st 6 2nd Ad- ditions. The proper number of valves and hydrants is also included. Property abutting Wescott Road is located in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressure of approximately 67 and 50 psi re- spectively. Services - It is proposed to provide an L?" diameter water service to each of the 3 existing residential homes located on the north side of Wescott Road. It is also proposed to provide 2 - 6" diameter water stubs to Greensboro Addi- tion and 1 - 6" diameter water stub to Outlot A in Lexington Square. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes two separate lateral sys- tems, as shown on the attached drawing. The westerly system provides for con- structing a 15" diameter storm sewer pipe easterly from the trunk storm sewer to be constructed as part of Project No. 450 Williams and Larue 1st and 2nd Addition. The easterly system provides for constructing a combination of 24", 21", and 18" diameter storm sewer pipe westerly from the trunk storm sewer to be constructed as part of Project No. 433 Lexington Square 2nd Addition. The • proper number of catch basins and inlets are also.included to properly convey drainage from the adjacent property abutting Wescott Road. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes upgrading Wescott Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 52' width. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk is proposed on the north side and an 8' wide bituminous trail is proposed on the south side. . The grading of Wescott Road will generate approximately 7,000 cubic yards of excess material. It is anticipated this material will be placed in Lot 4 of Williams and Larue Addition. aw 2848d Page 2. ;! 9 EASEMENTS: Permanent and ,temporary easements are required to construct Wes- cott Road. The estimated amount of temporary and permanent easement required from each parcel is listed below: Page 3. 2848d Permanent Temporary Parcel Easement Easement Description (Acre) (Acre) SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addn.) 0.52 0.61 Parcel 030-53 0.13 0.12 Parcel 041-53 0 0.15 Parcel 050-53 0.13 0.12 WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST ADDITION Lot 4 0 0.13• NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 0.14 0.13 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 0.41 0.62 Lot 18-31, Block 1 0 0.27. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: - ASSESSMENT AREA • SW 1/4 SECTION 14. Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addn.) Parcel 030-53 Parcel 041-53 Parcel 050-53 WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A Lots 18-31, Blk. 1 Page 3. 2848d COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 32,630 Water Main 81,650 Services 8,660 Storm Sewer 93,950 Street 398,530 TOTAL ........................ $615,420 The total estimated project cost is $615,420 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- • of -way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of�the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered trunk. However, the 10" diameter line in Wescott Road is also required to serve the easterly portion and additional areas in the proposed Greensboro Addition. Because the sanitary sewer line as indicated is necessary to service the Greensboro Addi- tion, it is proposed to assess this portion of sewer the lateral benefit from trunk rate per centerline foot to Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addition). The 8" diameter sewer stubs serving Parcel 010-51 are also proposed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate per centerline foot. Page 4. 2848d 30 WATER MAIN: The 12" water main proposed under this project is considered trunk. Therefore, it is proposed to assess those parcels benefiting from the trunk water main at the lateral benefit from trunk rate. It is also proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area water main which have not been previ- ously assessed as shown on the attached drawing. Parcels 030-53, 041-53, and 050-53 are single family residences and have more than 200' of frontage abut- ting Wescott Road and are larger than 3 acres. For these types of parcels As- sessment policy 86-3 provides for assessing only 100' of front footage for Lateral benefit from trunk main and 1 acre of each lot for trunk area assess- ments. The remaining assessment amounts will be levied at the time of devel- opment. Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro) is being assessed for ' of its frdnt foot- age. This assessment reflects looping benefit because no direct connections are proposed. Outlot A of Lexington Square Addition is proposed to be as- sessed its full frontage because its related credit for access looping is ap- plied against the 1st Addition. . SERVICES: Services are proposed to be asessed based -on the total cost of each service to each benefiting parcel. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is to be assessed as trunk and lat- eral. It is proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area storm sewer as- sessment which have not been previously assessed. Lateral storm sewer is pro- posed to be assessed at the equivalent assessment rate to all the platted and unplatted parcels with the exception of Outlot A of Lexington Square Addition and Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addition). The equivalent assessment rate is to be assessed against the entire frontage of Lots 18-31, Block 1 Lexington .Square Addition, Lot 4 Williams and Larue Addition, and Parcel 016-25. How- ever, a corner lot credit of 75' is applied to Lot 4, Williams and Larue Addi- tion and Parcel 016-25. Parcel 030-53, 041-53, and 050-53 are large unplatted Page 5. 2848d 3/ parcels which are homesteaded and are to be assessed the equivalent assessment rate in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3. Similar to the water main as- sessment, this policy provides that only 100' of frontage for these types of parcels is to be assessed. Lateral storm sewer assessment to Parcel- 010-51 (Greensboro Addition) and Outlot A Lexington Square Addition is to be assessed based on the cost to con- struct the easterly storm sewer segment and the drainage area that it bene- fits. However, the cost to be assessed excludes the cost of a 12" equivalent trunk storm sewer from Pond JP -32A to the existing trunk located on the east line of Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addition) in Wescott Road. The assessed cost against the benefited drainage area within each parcel was then'deter- mined and converted to an assessment rate per front foot based on the front footage of that parcel that abuts Wescott Road. STREET: Street is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis based on the residential equivalent rate to all the residential parcels (platted and unplatted) in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3 with the exception of. Parcel 016-25. Parcel 016-25 is proposed to be assessed its full residential equivalent rate because it is not homesteaded or considered residential. A corner lot credit of 75' was applied to Lot 4 Williams and Larue Addition and Parcel 016-25. The platted lots in Lexington Square Addition which back onto - Wescott Road and take access onto Briar Creek Road are not proposed to be as- sessed. The large unplatted parcels (030-53, 041-53, and 050-53) 'which are homesteaded are to be assessed based on 100' of front footage in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: . Page 6. 2848d 3y r Page 7. 2848d 03 SANITARY SEWER _ Lateral Benefit from Trunk $28.69/centerline foot WATER MAIN Trunk Area: Single -Family $1,190/Ac. Lateral Benefit from Trunk: Single -Family $11.88/F.F. STORM SEWER: Trunk Area: Single Family/Agricultural $0.05/sq.ft. Lateral Benefit from Trunk $9.80/F.F. ® STREET Residential Equivalent $33.75/F.F. 1/2 Residential Equivalent $16.88/F.F. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk $32,630 Lateral Benefit from Trunk $20,944 • $32,630 $20,944 -$11,686 WATER MAIN Trunk $81,650 Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 24,939 Trunk Area 115,620 $81,650 $140,559 +$58,909 SERVICES Lateral $ 8,660 Lateral Assessment $ 8,660 $ 8,660 $ 8,660 - 0 - r Page 7. 2848d 03 STORM SEWER AND STREET Storm Sewer $ 93,950 Street $398,530 Lateral Storm Sewer & Street Assessment $119,257 Trunk Area Storm Sewer 8,250 $492,480 $127,507 —$364,973 TOTAL —$317,750 The anticipated project deficit is $317,750. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 8. 2848d 3� is 2/18/86 3/18/86 4/86 5/86 Fall/86 Spring/87 May/88 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 467 A) SANITARY SEWER 340 Lin.ft. 10" PVC San. sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $14.00/l.f. 330 Lin.ft. 10" PVC San. sewer, 15'-25' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/l.f. 250 Lin.ft. 8" PVC San. sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $12.00/l.f. 4 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 25 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Connect PVC to ex. MH @ $500.00/each 150 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 920 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies . ® +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. h Bond Interest TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ................................ Page 9. 2848d 35 $ 4,760 8,580 3,000 3,600 1,500 1,000 1,500 $24,860 1.240 $26,100 6.530 $32,630 B) WATER MAIN 2,280 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water main in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in p1. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 3 Each 12" Butterfly valve 6 box @ $1,000.00/each 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $400.00/each 1,500 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.50/lb. 1 Each Connect 12" DIP to existing 12" DIP @ $500.00/each 50 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,280 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest TOTAL WATER MAIN ..................................... Page 10. 2848d 3(1 $50,160 720 2,000 3,000 800 2,250 500 500 2,280 $62,210 3,110 $65,320 16,330 $81,650 • • • C) SERVICE 170 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 170 Lin.ft. 1�" Type K copper in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft. 3 Each 12" x 6" Tee in pl. @ $300.00/each 3 Each lz" Corporation stop in pl. @ $40.00/each 3 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve S box @ $400.00/each 3 Each 1'z" Curb stop 5 box @ $100.00/each 340 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL SERVICES ...................................... Page 11. 2848d 37 $ 2,040 1,700 900 120 1,200 . 300 340- $ 6,600 330 $ 6,930 1,730 $ 8,660 D) STORM SEWER 160 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. $ 5,120 270 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,560 710 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/1in.ft. 18,460 710 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 15,620 170 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 3,400 5 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 4,500 5 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 4,500 9 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 7,200 . 3 Each 12" RCP flared end section @ $600.00/each 1,800 • 1 Each Connect 24" RCP to ex. MH @ $400.00/each 400 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,020 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,020 Total $71,580 +5% Contingencies 3,580 $75,160 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 18,790 TOTAL STORM SEWER .................................. $93,950 Page 12. 28484 3� $318,820 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 79,710 TOTAL STREET ............... :...................... $398,530 Page 13. 2848d 3 E) STREET LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees '@ $3,000.00/L.S. $ 3,000 13,500 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $1.80/cu.yd. 24,300 2,000 Cu.yds. Subgrade excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 4,000 1,000 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $5.00/cu.yd. 5,000 14,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 70,000 1,050 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $7.00/ton 7,350 3,400 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 37,400 1,300 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $12.00/ton 15,600 • 300 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $15.00/ton 4,500 280 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 58,800 650 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.60/gal. 1,040 5,100 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.50/lin.ft. 28,050 12,750 Sq.ft. Concrete sidewalk w/granular base @ $2.00/sq.ft. 25,500 25 Each Adjust MH & CB frame @ $200.00/each 5,000 4 Each Adjust valve box @ $150.00/each 600 4,000 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $1.50/sq.yd. 6,000 ® 5.0 Acre Seeding w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/ac. 7,500 Total $303,640 +5% Contingencies 15,180 $318,820 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 79,710 TOTAL STREET ............... :...................... $398,530 Page 13. 2848d 3 SUMMARY A. SANITARY SEWER $ 32,630 B. WATER MAIN 81,650 C. SERVICE 8,660 D. STORM SEWER 93,950 E. STREET 398.530 TOTAL ....................... $615,420 • • Page 14. 2848d /' • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 467 A. SANITARY SEWER a.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Assessable Description Footage SW 1/4 'SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 730 TOTAL B. WATER MAIN a.) Lateral BEnefit from Trunk Rate/Center- Total line Foot Assessment $28.69 Parcel Front Assessable Description Footage Credit Footage Rate/F.F. SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 1,325 662 663 $11.875 Parcel 030-53 330 230 (1) 100 11.875 Parcel 041-53 330 230(1) 100 11.875 Parcel 050-53 335 235(1) 100 11.875 ® NW 1/4 SECTION 23 $ 20,944 $ 20,944 Total Assessment $ '7,873 1,188 1,188 1,188 Parcel 016-25 82 $11.875 $ 974 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 1,055 $11.875 12,528 TOTAL $ 24,939 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. Page 15. 2848d B) WATER MAIN (Cont'd.) b.) Trunk Area NW 1/4 SECTION 23 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 61' 1 $1,687 $ 1,687 TOTAL $ 8,660 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. Page 16. 2848d Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Total Description (ac.) (ac.) (ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 39.28 Pond (1.8) Str. 207 29,98 $1,190 $ 35,676 Parcel 030-53 4.75 $3.75(1) 1.0 1,190 1,190 Parcel 041-53 4.62 3.62(1) 1.0 1,190 1,190 Parcel 050-53 4.82 3.82(1) 1.0 1,190 1,190 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 • LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 81.72 Pond (1.5) Str. 207 64.18 $1,190 $ 76,374 TOTAL $115,620 C) SERVICE (Water) Parcel Service No. of Total Description Size Services Cost/Service Assessment SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 6" 2 $1,687 $ 3,374 Parcel 030-53 1I" 1 1,200 1,200 Parcel 041-53 1Y" 1 1,200 1,200 • Parcel 050-53 1I" 1 1,200 1,200 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 61' 1 $1,687 $ 1,687 TOTAL $ 8,660 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. Page 16. 2848d D. STORM SEWER b.) Trunk Area Parcel Description NW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 041-53 Parcel 050-53 TOTAL Assessable Area Credit Rate Total 201,247 s.f. 118,747 s.f. (1) 82,500 s.f. $0.05/sf $ 4,125 209,959 s.f. 127,459 s.f. (1) 82,500 s.f. 0.05/sf 4,125 $ 8,250 E. LATERAL STORM SEWER AND STREET ® Lateral Front Assessable Storm Parcel Footage Credit Footage Sewer Street Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/FF Rate/FF Assessment SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 11325 0 1,325 $18.28(4) $16.88 $46,587 (2) Parcel 030-53 330 230 100 9.80 16.88 2,668 (2) Parcel 041-53 330 230 100 9.80 16.88 2,668 Parcel 050-53 335 235 (2) 100 9.80 16.88 2,668 WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST ADDITION .. Lot 4 280 75(3) 205 $ 9.80 $16.88 $ 5,469 ® NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 361 75(3) 286 $ 9.80 $33.75 $12,455 Page 17. 2848d '/-3 (1) Large lot credit policy. (2) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. (3) Corner lot credit. (4) Assessment rate equals lateral storm sewer cost divided by benefited drainage area converted to front foot assessment as follows: Project Cost Easterly Storm Sewer System = $ 71,990 12" Equivalent Trunk (JP -32A to east line Parcel 010-51) _ $-14,040 Project Cost Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer = $ 57,950 Benefited Drainage Area = 18.9 Ac. Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer Rate/acre = $3,066/Ac. Lateral Storm Sewer Assessment: Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro) = 7.9 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $24,221 Rate/F.F. _ $24,221 - 1,325 F.F.=.$18.28/F.F. Outlot A Lexington Square = 5.6 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $17,170 Rate/F.F. _ $17,170 - 1,055 F.F. _ $16.27/F.F. Page 18. 2848d W u Lateral Front Assessable Storm Parcel Footage Credit Footage Sewer Street Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/FF Rate/FF Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 11055 0 1,055 $16.27(4) $16.88 $34,973 Lot 18, Blk. 1 143 0 143 9.80 0.00 1,401 Lot 19, Blk. 1 97 0 97 9.80 0.00 951 lot 20, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 21, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 22, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 23, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 24, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 25, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 26, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 •735 Lot 27, Blk. 1 .79 0 79 9.80 0.00 774 Lot 28, Blk. 1 84 0 84 9.80 0.00 823 Lot 29, Blk. 1 85 0 85 9.80 0.00 833 Lot 30, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 31, Blk. 1 113 0 113 9.80 0.00 1,107 $119,257 (1) Large lot credit policy. (2) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. (3) Corner lot credit. (4) Assessment rate equals lateral storm sewer cost divided by benefited drainage area converted to front foot assessment as follows: Project Cost Easterly Storm Sewer System = $ 71,990 12" Equivalent Trunk (JP -32A to east line Parcel 010-51) _ $-14,040 Project Cost Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer = $ 57,950 Benefited Drainage Area = 18.9 Ac. Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer Rate/acre = $3,066/Ac. Lateral Storm Sewer Assessment: Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro) = 7.9 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $24,221 Rate/F.F. _ $24,221 - 1,325 F.F.=.$18.28/F.F. Outlot A Lexington Square = 5.6 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $17,170 Rate/F.F. _ $17,170 - 1,055 F.F. _ $16.27/F.F. Page 18. 2848d W u SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WESCOTT ROAD PROSECT NO. 467 WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 2848d $ 974 Page 19. • Storm Sewer Sanitary Trunk Storm Sewer Total Sewer Later- Water Main Assessment Parcel al Benefit Lateral Bene- Trunk Service Description from Trunk fit from Trunk Area (Water) SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 $20,944 $ 7,873 $ 35,676 $3,374 (Greensboro) Parcel 030-53 1,188 1,190 1,200 Parcel 041-53 1,188 1,190 1,200 y� ( Parcel 050-53 1,188 1,190 1,200 WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 2848d $ 974 Page 19. • Storm Sewer Lateral Trunk Storm Sewer Total Area 6 Street Assessment $ 46,587 $114,454 2,668 6,246 $4,125 2,668 10,371 4,125 2,668 10,371 $ 5,469 $ 5,469 $ 12,455 $ 13,429 Page 20. Sanitary Sewer Later- Water Main Storm Sewer Lateral Parcel al Benefit Lateral Bene- Trunk Service Trunk Storm Sewer Total Description from Trunk fit from Trunk Area (Water) Area 6 Street Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A $12,528 $ 76,374 $1,687 $ 34,973 $125,562 Lot 18, Blk. 1 1,401 1,401 Lot 19, Blk. 1 951 951 Lot 20, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 21, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 22, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 23, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 24, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 25, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 26, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 27, Blk. 1 774 774 Lot 28, Blk. 1 823 823 Lot 29, Blk. 1 833 833 Lot 30, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 31, Blk. 1 1,107 1,107 TOTAL $20,944 $24,939 $115,620 $8,660 $8,250 $119,257 $297,670 Page 20. WESCOTT ROAD SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date: JAN., 1956 P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 O 1 N /�- �� Ul I f --1010 �5i'♦ < PVC i 04.1-53 050-53 I ---4 I YILL i 8° PVC PROPOSED 10°'PVC SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 1211 RCP SANITARY SEWER f OUTLOT A 0 200 4001 ®® LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT (; WESCOTT ROAD II SANITARY SEWER ASSESSEMENTS K l EAGAN, MINNESOTA ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / (� FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 PVC i PROPOSED 10°'PVC SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 1211 RCP SANITARY SEWER f OUTLOT A 0 200 4001 ®® LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT (; WESCOTT ROAD II SANITARY SEWER ASSESSEMENTS K l EAGAN, MINNESOTA ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / (� FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 •1 �I I 013 -Tb 111111 IRP 1111 1 092.33 4 'TER MAIN AR RE N RA. PROPOSED DLR Olb-23 WATER MAINN 5 K TT E C K RD \.1 a u u z /v AM NAH R OUTLOT A a p 206 900 J J v m VW—N� WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / FRONT FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 4 6 7 0 / Uf 1 I I 1 1 � I I I I _ 030.33 1 091-33 1 030-33 __ r I i I J (-- 1100' IDD' a 4 'TER MAIN AR RE N RA. PROPOSED DLR Olb-23 WATER MAINN 5 K TT E C K RD \.1 a u u z /v AM NAH R OUTLOT A a p 206 900 J J v m VW—N� WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / FRONT FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 4 6 7 (1)- ASSESSED FOR I ACRE PER ASSESSMENT POLICY 86-3 0 WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK AREA WATER ASSESSEMENT AREA BONESTROO, RO'SENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paid. Minn. EAGAN, MINNESOTA IDate: JAN., 1986 l� PROJ. NO. JapComm. 49381 J 467 •1 *'I POND JP -32 I` Y \ II 013-76w S ro` to /.< �`y •" �� ` 1___TJP-32A i J030-53 oal.ss 050-55 r--i-f Et IS - I (PROPOSED _J /--_~ �i 1 t pol-- --1--- 100 115'RCP 100 WESCOTT ROAD //100 0 I SEWER -_-�I--- `' ' IBRCP (BRC P. 21 R EXISTINYG" / / S RCP RR R RE K RD PROPOSED STORM SEWER / STORM SE'NER 016-25 EXISTING 49'RCP J STORM SEWERLI `I w P / J K TT E K RO TR TR a W Y g SA2 AR R m OUTLOT A I a o zco1 ® a 3 J 0 rc J yE m OANR RV I- TRAIL DIT -25 WESCOTT ROAD STORM SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA LATERAL STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT LATERAL BENEFIT RATE/ FRONT FOOT EQUIVALENT RATE/FRONT FOOT A 751 CORNER LOT CREDIT BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLII{ & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 P R O D. N O. Comm. 49381 4 67 NI M TRUNK STORM SEWER WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER ASS'ESSEMENT AREA EAGAN, MINNESOTA DIT) BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers Date: JAN., 1986 Jl Jj P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 011-06 062-53 010-53 I 001-]] 050-53 OPOSED 18 CONC. I 5' CONCRE 8 G. F -F 1100 SIDEWALK k 100 8Ri R DIRE K I RLD. 8•BITUMINOUS TRAIL ffffl PROPOSED 6618 G K TTCURB BGUTTER Ill V /• OOTLOT 9 0 200 400 01)-25 WESCOTT ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA STREET ASSESSMENT FULL RESIDENTIAL RATE/FRONT FOOT 1/2 RESIDENTIAL RATE/FRONT FOOT A 751 CORNER LOT CREDIT 13ONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIi< & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 PROD. NO. 115'3 Comm. 49381 467 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen TOLLEFSON BUILDERS/CONTRACTOR LICENSE SUSPENSION A. Tollefson Builders for Review and Consideration of Contractor's License Suspension --At the February 4, 1986 City Council meeting, a public hearing was scheduled to consider the vacation of a utility easement for Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition. As a result of public testimony, and discussion by City Council, action was taken by the City Council to temporarily deny any further building permits to Tollefson Builders Inc. and further to consider not renewing the builder's license if the findings of staff regarding prior and existing problems with the builder • substantiate this or other similar action. The contractor license was suspended until the March 4 City Council meeting to allow the City staff time to research other issues in addition to the utility easement that have resulted in noncompliance or noncon- formance by Tollefson Builders. At the March 4 City Council meeting memos of summary from both the Protective Inspections and Engineering Departments were presented for review and considera- tion. It was determined by the City Council that the contractor license suspension would continue until the March 19 meeting to provide more specific detail regarding the problems that are identified by staff summary. In addition, meetings be held with Tollefson Builders to review the various issues that are a matter of record. Meetings were held with representatives of Tollefson Builders on Friday, March 7 and Thursday, March 13 to discuss each of the issues in detail. For a copy of the information submitted •by the Public Works Department to Mr. Tollefson entitled "Tollefson Builders Inc., Unresolved Development Issues", refer to pages __6'5 through �pi� Within the Building Inspections Department all building p r� mits that were granted to Tollefson Builders during 1985 were reviewed and it appears there are two (2) building permits that have not been finaled and two (2) building, permits which were impacted by the sewer easement which are the homes for Mr. Skupas and Mr. Buckingham. For a copy of the list of permits granted to Tollefson Builders in the Brittany Addition refer to pages 3 through The Inspection Department will follow up on the two building permits which are not finalized, as a matter of record,and a report will be available at the meeting on Wednesday. All other building permits granted in other subdivisions including Briar Hill during 1985 are also being researched, however, there is no evidence that Tollefson has violated uniform building code requirements. of the City. 5� Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen During the week of March 10 through 14 it was learned that Tollefson Builders Inc. was operating a landfill northeast of Brittany Addition. The Dakota County Environmental Services Division and the City's Engineering Department are serving notice on Tollefson Builders regarding the violation. Enclosed on pages 75'tJ6 are copies of memos from Craig Knudsen, Engineering Technician. The City has received two (2) letters from property owners regarding problems they have experienced as homeowners in the Briar Hill and Brittany Additions res ectively. For a copy of that correspon- dence refer to pages through Y/ The memo is enclosed on page * that ex Tains uniform building code responsibility and also addresses the model home permit that was issued in the Brittany 7th Addition. In summary, the memorandums and fact findings indicate an ongoing problem the City is having with Tollefson Builders regarding conformance and compliance with various conditions that are set forth by the City Council with the approval of certain development projects. There have also been other problems such as on-site dumping in both Briar Hill and Brittany Additions, expiration of model home permits, homes started without building permits and other related issues as defined in the memos by the Director of Public Works and the Chief Building Inspector. The City Attorney's office has prepared a stipulation agreement which is suggested as course of action to require- Tollefson Builders to resolve all previous conditions set forth by the City Council in previous development agreements. The agreement also requires that Tollefson Builders meet all other City regulations before the City can terminate all work relating subdivision development, construction of residential homes or any other type of development relating to that project. The stipulation agreement is being revised by the City Attorney's office and will be presented to legal counsel for Carl Tollefson. A copy of the agreement with specific conditions will be distributed on Monday. ACTION TO BE. CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny any further suspension of building permits for Tollefson Builders andand further that a stipulation agreement be considered and approved with or without modification as presented. *This memo will be included with the Additional Information Packet which will be sent out on Monday, March 17. _5 Lrnt ' 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Movor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN .. JAMES A, SMITH VIC ELLISON ., March 19, 1986 THEODORE WACHTER Courcil Memi ers .. THOMAS HEDGES Cry P rninistrcfor - EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CARL TOLLEFSON City Clerk TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 RE: TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC ® UNRESOLVED DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Dear Mr. Tollefson: In response to the Council's directive of March 4, 1986, and our collective meeting on March 7, 1986, I have prepared the attached list of unresolved issues pertaining to subdivisions developed by your organization. You will note that the resolution of several of these items is currently in process but has not been completed. Also, other items will not be able to be specifically identified in further detail pertaining to individual locations until weather conditions permit a field inspection by our Engineering and/or Utility Maintenance personnel. Your assistance and cooperation in taking care of these items as soon as practical will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions pertaining to any of the information being forwarded to you, please contact me for further clarification. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Enclosure cc: ,.Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator THE, LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SUBDIVISION LOCATION 1. Briar Hill Lots 15, 29, 30, 31 & 32 4th Addn. of Block 1 2. Briar Hill Lots 15, 16, 27, 28, 29 4th Addn. & 30 of Block 1 3. Briar Hill Lots 19 & 20, Block 1 1st Addn. 4. Briar Hill Several Undefined Additions Addresses 5. Briar Hill Tot Lot 4th Addn. 6. Briar Hill W. Embankment of 3rd Addn. Dolomite Dr. 7. Brittany 5th NA Addn. 8. Brittany 5th Norwood Ct. 1st Addn. Addn. 5?; Revised 3/13/86 UNRESOLVED DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Encroachment in Public Easement Incompleted Trailway System and/or Insufficient Easement Dedication Insufficient Trailway Easement Dedication Final Water Stop Box & Sewer Cleanout Location, Adjustment & Repair Installation of Sod Improper, Unacceptable Restoration - Topsoil & Vegetation Required Expiration of Financial Guarantee Prior to Com- pletion of Requirements Failure to Provide Ade- quate Erosion Control Resulting in Damage to 1613 Norwood Dr. (Michael Frank) LOCATION UNRESOLVED DEVELOPMENT ISSUES J , 9. Brittany 6th, NA Outstanding Invoice #Is 7th, 8th & 9th 1707, 1899, 1900, 1901 Addns. 1902, 1903, 1933, 1934, 1955 10. Brittany 6th & Lot 7, Block 1 of a. Encroachment into 7th Additions Brittany 6th Addn., public easement. Lots 4 & 5, Block 2 b. Inadequate easement of Brittany 7th Addn. dedication for public utilities. c. Inaccurate placement of public utility. • d. Improper compaction of backfill material 11. Brittany 7th Sanitary Sewer Line Sewer Blockage (2/1/86) Addn. 12. Brittany 5th, 6th NA Lack of Application and/ 7th & 8th or Permit from PCA 13. Brittany 3rd Lot 7, Block 2 Possible Encroachment in Addn. Utility Easement •. 14. Briar Hill 4th Building 3 & 4 Site Drainage 15• Brittany 10th NA Illegal Garbage Dump Addn. 16. Brittany 7th Lot 7, Block 2 Special Assessment Addn. Bob Sprague Allocations J , 3030 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.0- BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 October -l2-,-1984 Carl TEYI Yefson-- , Tollefson Builders 1655 Norwood --Drive Eagan, MN 55122 BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH - - JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER REGISTERED MAIL Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Aaministrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clery RE: BRIAR HILL 1ST, 2ND AND. 3RD ADDITIONS - REPAIR BROKER SANITARY SEWER—CLEAN OUTS AND ADJUST ALL SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUTS AND WATER.CURB STOP BOXES. TO 1" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. Dear Carl: This letter is to inform you that the City of Eagan will require you t—o_ repair__several broken sanitary sewer clean outs and adjust all sanitary sewer clean outs and water curb stop boxes to 1" below finished_slr-ade_within the above named subdivisions by October 26, 1984, or the City of Eagan will hire a plumbing contractor to perform the _.above_. mentioned work and you will be responsible for the cost involved plus a 15% overhead charge. Your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter will be greatly • appreciated. Sincerely, Edward J Kirscht Engineering Technician EJK:jbd cc: Richard Hefti Joe Connolly 6V THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL Mr. Carl Tollefson Tollefson Builders, Inc. ® 1655 Norwood Drive Eagan MN 55122 RE: BRIAR HILL 4TH ADDITION - BROKEN CLEAN OUT AT 3869 HEATHER DRIVE Dear Carl: BEA BLOMQUIST' Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER ._ Council Members THOMAS HEDGES " City Aaministrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk It has been brought to my attention that there is a broken sanitary sewer clean out at 3869 Heather Drive. This letter is to inform you that the City -of Eagan will require that you repair the above mentioned broken clean out by October 26, 1984, or the City of Eagan will hire a plumbing contractor to make. the necessary repairs and you will be responsible for the cost in- volved plus a 15% overhead charge. Your cooperation and PROMP ATTENTION to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, CA Edward , J. Kars Engineering Technician EJK:jbd cc: Richard M. Hefti, Assisstant City Engineer Joe Connolly THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 9� 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) d5d-8100 October 15, 1984 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 REGISTERED MAIL Re: Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Addition — Financial Guarantl Letter of Credit No. 16667 BEA.BLOM9UIST Moya THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Ca iMarWan THOMAS HEDGES CRY A6ni If a EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city Clete I have reviewed the progress concerning the work required in regard to the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions. Listed below is a list of items and the work which is required as per the development contracts for said Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions. Please note you have allowed Letter of Credit No. 14140 for the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions to lapse in violation of Item 10 of the development contract. The required financial guarantee amount ,required for the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Addition has been calculated in accordance with City policies and is to incorporate the following items. r 1) A. Restoration and boulevard sod or seed $2,000.00 B. Adjust and/or repair water curb stop boxes and sanitary sewer cleanouts 4,000.00 TOTAL 6,000.00 C. Contingencies (25% of Subtotal) 1,250.00 D. SUBTOTAL $7,500.00 The required financial guarantee amount required for the Briar Hill 4th Addition has been calculated in accordance with the development contract as listed below. ORIGINAL AMOUNT AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT REDUCED REMAINING 1) Street Identification $ 525.00 $ 525.00 0.00 Traffic Control Signs 2) Street Lights (2) 3,850.00 2,750.00 1,100.00 3) Tot Lot 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 4) Subdivision Monuments 500.00 500.00 0.00 5) Landscaping 2,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 6) A. Erosion Control 4,503.00 4,003.00 500.00 B. Grading (R/W only) 5,300.00 5,000.00 300.00 C. Restoration 19,335.00 17,335.00 2,000.00 �O ♦ THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY C. Contingencies a) Adjust and repair water curb stop boxes and ,I ' r r Carl Tollefson sanitary sewer cleanouts!: October 15, 1984 b) Construct Blacktop trail between Lots 30 & 32 of Page 2 Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addn. 8,000.00 D. ORIGINAL AMOUNT AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT..,, REDUCED REMAINING 7) A.Lateral Service from Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions = $25,400.00 Trunk Water Main $15,727.28 $15,727.28 0.00 B.Subtotal $9,900.00 C. Contingencies a) Adjust and repair water curb stop boxes and sanitary sewer cleanouts!: b) Construct Blacktop trail between Lots 30 & 32 of Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addn. 8,000.00 D. SUBTOTAL 17,900.00 Line 1) D plus Line 7-D is the total amount of required financial guarantee for Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions = $25,400.00 Enclosed is a typed form to give the City of Eagan permission in writing to transfer $7,500.00 (the remaining work of the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions) to Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667 which is the existing Letter of Credit for the Briar Hill Fourth Addition. Upon the receipt of the signed written request to combine the remaining financial guarantee requirement of the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions with the Briar Hill 4th Addition and Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667, I will then proceed in reducing said Letter of Credit No. 16667 as indicated in this letter. Listed below are items which I am requesting your cooperation and prompt attention. Restoration of the boulevard area and drainage easement just west of Dolomite rr" Drive, north of Gold Trail, which needs to be graded, sodded or seeded in the y Ilk Briar Hill 3rd Addition. /✓e TPS „� per, .._ Sc E ,.� s" ,p 2) Repair the driveways where storm sewer was installed this past summer on Lots G�4 �• 13 and 14 of the Briar Hill 3rd Addition. r3) Adjust and/or repair sanitary sewer cleanouts and water curb stop boxes to 1" below finish grade in the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions. ti rB'g�4) Order Dakota Electric to install the last two luminaires on two street light 6 I poles on Willow Way. It appears that the Briar Hill 4th Addition is nearly 100% developed. As soon as the above -listed street lights are installed, I will transfer the energy costs to the property owners. "( ✓5) Construct the tot lot and, also, as soon as the tot lot is constructed, then action should be taken to vacate a portion of the tot lot easement which is I 41 not required. I have heard the home on Lot 15, Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition, del is encroaching on this easement. ,A) Construct the incompleted portion of the blacktop trail system between Lots wi 30 and 32 of Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition, which will complete the trail system. If you have any questions, please contact me at 454-8100. Sincerely, �Va��� Edwwa d JJ.lirscht Engineering Technician EJK/jj cc: Patricia Gnetz - 1st Bank Tom Colbert DATE TO: Edward Kirscht Engineering Technician City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan Mn 55122 RE: Transfer the Remaining Financial Guarantee Amount of,$7.,500.00 r For Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions To The Briar Hill Fourth Addition and Letter of Creidt No. 16667. Tollefson Builders and the First National Bank of St. Paul Hereby Grant the City of Eagan Permission' to Add the Proposed Financial Guarantee Revised Amount of $7,500.00 From Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions to the Briar Hill 4th Addition Development Contract., and Letter of Credit No. 16667. Tollefson Builders Date The First National Bank Of St. Paul Date r 1 ®F 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL November 2, 1984 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions and Brittany 5th and 6th Additions - Incomplete Work BEA BLOM9UIST Mayw THOMAS.EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Cg d Memb ' THOMAS HEDGES GIY Ad kvstrata EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On November 1, 1984, I made a field inspection of the above -listed subdivisions listed below are itmes which were incomplete concerning work which the City will require to be completed as per the development contracts for said above - listed subdivisions. Would you please respond to this letter and give the City of Eagan a proposed date for completion of the below listed work. DATE REQUIRED ITEM SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION 1. Restoration Briar Hill 3rd Addn. Restoration of the boulevard 0a Ie�I J Secd e4 AREA was 6'J"f Srdlr Ani... -Ft dF a if are of +Fe ju.<aee, Was PLa;i d -('o Covxr area and part of the drainage a, easement just west of Dolomite Dr., north of ,Gold Tr., which needs some black dirt then D;�(- sodded or seeded with mulch. Some work was done recently. No black dirt was placed to cover the debris. Nothing was done just north of Gold Tr. where thereis a pile of dirt. No &Qa J4 K&bh(e 5/15/85 2. Restoration Briar Hill 3rd Addn. Repair the driveways and land- 1_1g_g scaping where storm sewer was Dome E 8 k' installed this past summer on 11/10/84 Lots 13 & 14, Block 1, of the Briar Hill 3rd Addn. 3. Restoration Briar Hill 1st, 2nd. Adjust and/or repair sanitary 3rd and 4th Addn. sewer cleanouts and water curb stop boxes to 1" below finish 11/10/84 grade in the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3,rd and 4th Addns. 4. Street Lights Briar Hill 4th Addn. Order Dakota Electric to install po�a the last two luminaires on two street light poles on Willow Way. It appears that the Briar Hill 11/1'5/85 4th Addn. is nearly 100% developed. �3 THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY CARL TOLLEFSON NOVEMBER 2, 1984 PAGE 2 ITEM SUBDIVISION 4. ('Continued) 5. Tot Lot Briar Hill 4th Addn £hsE146ut IaF.s Nub � 4 ilaP�., Jac�.�td !nn u -a rt ;'cue i•z9-96 6. Trail System Briar Hill 4th Addn 7. Landscape Briar Hill 3rd & Screening 4th Addn. This wo $ Do,c .r 4kt ,4 13e R;-c,kt�IC fo t.l o g e S"r s 8. Erosion Problem Brittany 5th Addn. Claim o T aNE= �s -4-' iJ wG 4-:11sc✓ (P DATE REQUIRED REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION As soon as the above -listed street lights are installed, I will transfer the energy 11/15/85 costs to the property owners. Construct the tot lot and, also, as soon as the tot lot is constucted, then action should be taken to vacate a portion.o he tot lot ease - en n�ch is not require . I have heard the ,home on Lot 15, Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition, is encroaching on this easement. The existing easement shall be located in _ relation to the existing home on said Lot 15, Block 1. Construct the incompleted portion of the blacktop trail system between Lots 28 & 30 of Block 1, which will complete the trail system. The City will require a new easement for said trail. Vacate existing trail ease- ment between Lots 30 & 32 with request to Tom Colbert for City Council action. 6/1/85 L• a 146 +- ookt e, gr IL 6/1/85 Resolve the claim of Michael J. Frank of Lot 13, Block 2, Brittany 1st. Damage was done to his property due to erosion of mud and debris from the Brittany 5th Addn. 11/20/84 Complete the required land- ._ scape screening of residen- tial lots abutting the east 7- e'/C and southerly side of Briarl �Q C Hill 4th Addn. and the required landscape screening5/15/85 of residential lots abutt- ing the easterly side of Briar Hill 3rd Addn. Resolve the claim of Michael J. Frank of Lot 13, Block 2, Brittany 1st. Damage was done to his property due to erosion of mud and debris from the Brittany 5th Addn. 11/20/84 CARL TOLLEFSON NOVEMBER 2, 1984 PAGE 3 ITEM 9. As-Builts 10. Boulevard Restoration 11 DATE REQUIRE; SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION Brittany 5th & As-builts have not been fur - 6th Addn. nished as of this date. The City policy on receiving as- 11/16/84 builts is to have them for all projects by April 15, the year after the work is con- / structed. We should have received them no later than April 15, 1984. Brittany 5th & I sent a letter on 10-10-84, 6th Addn. requesting that you place soil and seed with mulch on the boulevards. You did not place any black dirt. I could not find any seed, and only placed 5/15/84 some hay on approximately " of the boulevard area instead of the 13' boulevard area. Chances are �. in-place hay bales will be destroyed ' _when the snow is plowed. 11. Clean up Brittany 5th Addn. There is mud on Sheffield Ct. which has not been cleaned up. 11/10/84 ?/z,/j r 12. Black Top Brittany 6th Addn. Complete the -paving of C?, 4 i?� Final Lift Sherwood Court. 11/15/84 Z r r/J9 4 The City is requesting that you respond in writing and enclose, a copy of this letter indicating a scheduled date for completion of the above-mentioned work. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Q` =4 � Edward J. Kirscht Engineering Technician EJK/jj cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer E ©F esu 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 JUNE 20, 1985 an CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Briar Hill 4th Addition Dear Mr. Tollefson: BEA BLOMQUIST Moyer THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER .. CO l'rCir Members THOMAS HEDGES City Adminsvator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Enclosed is a list of items needing attention in the Briar Hil� 4th Addition. These items must be completed to the City's satisfac tion in order to reduce the Financial Guarantee and, to issue building permits to the Brittany 8th Addition. 1) Construct the incomplete portion of the bike trail between Lots 28 and 30 of Black 1. Also attach the bike trail to the driveway on Block 1, Lot 16. 2) Sand must be placed in the tot lot except where the slope prevents the sand from staying in place. 3) Complete the required landscape screening of residential lots abutting the east and southerly side of Briar Hill 4th Addition as indicated on enclosed sheets. 4) An agreement must be reached between the Homeowner's Association and developer to lower the water stop boxes in Briar Hill 1st and 2nd Addiditons. Complaints due to this problem must be eliminated. 5) Easements to be obtained and vacated will be addressed in a letter to Tollefson Builders as soon as we, receive the correct information from Bill Dolan. sincerely, Craig E. Knudsen Engineering Technician CEK:jeh cc: Rich Hefti Ed Kirscht THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY ®F eacia 3&70 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 I BEA 8LOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Maya PHONE: (612) 45d-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS JULY 12, 1985 THEODORE WACHTER cmmi Mem TIMOTHY T HAMILTON THOMAS HEDGES CiN Atl nshalu THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST PAUL EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE 3.32 MINNESOTA STREET onaerk ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Briar Hills 4th Addition - Release of Financial Guarantee y Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Please be informed that the City of Eagan hereby authorizes the release of Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667 that was issued August 16, 1982 in the amount of $51,256.25. The release of the above listed Irrevocable Letter of Credit is due to the fact that Briar Hills 4th Addition is nearly complete. The following items will be guaranteed by means of a $10,000.00 escrow account between. Carl Tollefson and the City of Eagan. 1) Completion of a bike path on Block 1, Lot 16 of Briar Hills 4th Addition. 2) The lowering of water stop boxes. 3) Acquisition of an easement between Lots 28 & 30, 29 & 27, • Block 1, Briar Hills 4th Addition. 4) Building a bike path along the common lot lines of the property mentioned in item #3. 5) Insurance that the shrubs placed in Briar Hills 4th Addition will not die. 6) Sanitary sewer clean out to be lowered on Laurel Ct.. If you have any questions please contact me at 454-8100. S e :ely, g E!rKnu sen Engineering Technician cc: Rich Hefti Ed Kirscht Carl Tollefson THE LONE OAK TREE. - .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 JULY 31, 1985 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Briar Hill 4th Addition Dear Mr. Toilefson: BEA BLOMQUIST Maw THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER -. Cmmc Members THOMAS HEDGES City AO Imft.1w EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Or, Clerk Enclosed is a list of the items which need to be finished in the Briar Hills Addition before the City can release the escrow account between Tollefson Builders and the City of Eagan. 1) Stop boxes need lowering at the following addresses on Laurel Court: 3828, 3826, 3830, 3832, 3838, 3840, 3839, 3823, 3805, 3811, 3813, 3806, 3810, 3818, 3820. 2) Sewer clean outs need to be lowered at 3833, 3817, 3816, Laurel Court. These stop boxes and sewer clean outs were items which should' have been resolved much earlier. When the Letter of Credit covering these items was released , it was understood that an additional Financial Guarantee would be placed toward Briar Hill 4th Addition to assure the completion of this project. Being that the additional Guarantee was never received and the work was never done, the City will not release any money until these items are finished. 3) Sod must be placed near the tot lot where timbers were removed. 4) Completion of a bike path on Block 1, Lot 16, of Briar Hills 4th Addition. - 5) Aquisition of an easement between Lots 28 and 30, 29 and 27, Block 1, Briar Hills 4th Addition. 6) Building a bike path along the common lot lines of the property mentioned in item #5. These items have been identified and brought to your attention 6� THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Briar Hill 4th Addition July 31, 1985 Page 2 several times. If these items are not completed by September 1, 1985, the City will hire a contractor to finish this job. All labor, materials, and City time will be charged against the escrow account set aside for these items. The remaining amount will be returned to Tollefson Builders. Si rely, /� 'u� - c Craig E. Knu sen Engineering Technician cc: Rich Hefti Ed Kirscht Ken Damlo CEK/jh of ecag an 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 - .. EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 October 23,1985 MR CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC 1655 NORWOOD DR EAGAN MN 55122 BEA BLOMQUIST MaYar THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER . Corm Me ml THOMAS HEDGES City Aammnmto EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ON Clete Re: Contract 84-T, Brittany 7th Addition MPCA/MWCC Permit Application - Sanitary Sewer Extensions Dear Mr. Tollefson: The City of Eagan has been contacted by representatives of the MPCA Enforcement Section and put on notice of pending civil penalties associated with allowing sanitary sewer extensions without receiving the appropriate permits or approvals from the MPCA or MWCC. They have identified the above referenced subdivision as having the sanitary sewer extension' constructed, completed and put into use without even an application being made for a permit. As the developer for the above referenced subdivision, selecting to install these public. -improvements privately rather than through a City initiated contract, you assumed the respons bilities of insuring that all appropriate permits were acquire prior to commencement of construction. Our files do not reflect any correspondence or information that would indicate that an application had been sent to the MPCA and/or MWCC for the above referenced subdivision. I would appreci- ate it if you would research your files and provide the City with copies of any information (correspondence, application forms, etc.) that you may have that can show that the proper rules and regulations were adhered to. Due to the fact that the City of. Eagan is required to respond to the PCA pertaining to the allegation of these violations by October 31, 1965, it is imperative that you provide" me with this information no later than October 29, 1985. THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MPCA/MWCC PERMIT APPLICATIONS PAGE TWO OCTOBER 23, 1985 If it has been determined' that no application was submitted and no permit received for the work that you performed on the installa- --tion of public utilities' under private contract;- it is very likely that the City of Eagan will incur a substantial civil penalty from the MPGA. Should this fine be levied against the City of Eaaan, we will be expecting you to reimburse the City for all costs associated with any identifiable violations pertaining to the above referenced subdivision. Your prompt review and response to my attention by October 29, 1985, will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Nomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jbd cc; Paul Hauge, City Attorney Bill Dolan, Meadowood Inc. 71 ®F ecag an 3530 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 MARCH 3, 1986 CARL TOLLEFSON BRITTANYESTATES, INC TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC 12617 FAIRGREEN AVE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 REGISTERED MAIL Re: Brittany 5th Addition- Irrevocable Letter of Credit No Dear Mr. Tollefson: BEA BLOMQUIST MWor THOMAS EGAN .WMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members .., THOMAS HEDGES City Abmini:Votcr EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Or, Cies 1770 The City of Eagan has been notified by the First National Bank of St. Paul, by Registered Mail dated February 26, 1986, and it elects to cancel the above-mentioned Letter of Credit. Please be informed that a new Financial Guarantee must be secured for Brittany 5th Addition. The new Financial Guarantee must reach our office by April 4, 1986 and be in the amount of $5,000. If this is not submitted by April 4, 1986, the City will have to draw upon the existing Letter of Credit due to expire May 4, 1986. If you have any questions, please contact me 454-8100. Sincerely, e iiCa Craig E. Knudsen Engineering Technician cc • Thomas'..A:.C.,. _, Olbert, Director of Public Works Carolyn S. Dull, First Bank St. Paul Paul Hauge, City Attorney CEK:jh THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 0. 1985 BUILDING PEMMS ISSUED TO TOLLEFSON BUILDERS ADDRESS 8 LEGAL DATE ISSUED DATE FINALED 4843 SHEFFIELD LN, L 2, B 1, BRITTANY 5TH 1/85 4/85 1576 SHERWOOD WAY, L 4, B 2, BRITTANY 3RD 1/85 5/85 1582 SHERWOOD WAY, L 3, B 2, BRITTANY 3RD 1/85 4/85 1660 SHERWOOD WAY, L 5, B 1, BRITTANY 2ND 4/85 9/85 4862 WINDSOR CT, L 11, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 4/85 7/85 4869 WINDSOR CT., L 4, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 4/85 SEWER EASEMENT PROBLEMS 1539 SHERWOOD WAY, L 3, B 1, BRITTANY 7TH 5/85 9/85 ® 4860 SHEFFIELD LN, L 1, B 3, BRITTANY 3RD 6/85 10/85 4853 SHEFFIELD LN, L 7, B 1, BRITTANY 5TH 6/85 9/85 1575 SHERWOOD CT, L 9, B 1, BRITTANY 6TH 6/85 11/85 4839 SHEFFIELD LN, L 1, B 1, BRITTANY 5TH 6/85 9/85 1563 SHERWOOD CT, L 7, B 1, BRITTANY 6TH 7/85 NOT FINALED 4884 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 9, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 FOOTINGS ONLY 4879 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 7, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 11/85 4871 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 5, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 12/85 4872 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 12, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 12/85 ® 4856 WINDSOR CT, L 12, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 7/85 11/85 4876 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 11, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 8/85 12/85 4883 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 8, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 8/85 1/86 4874 WINDSOR CT, L 9, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 8/85 NOT FINALED 1543 SHERWOOD WAY, L 2, B 1, BRITTANY 7TH 8/85 11/85 1580 SHERWOOD CT, L 3, B 1, BRITTANY 6TH 8/85 11/85 4864 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 14, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 9/85 2/86 4875 WINDSOR CT, L 5, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 9/85 SEWER EASEMENT PROBLEMS 4868 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 13, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 10/85 2/86 1661 SHERWOOD WAY, L 2, B 2, BRITTANY 2ND 10/85 2/86 1528 SHERWOOD WAY, L 16, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 10/85 2/86 73 1985 BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED TO TOLLEFSON BUILDERS (CONTINUED) ADDRESS 6 LEGAL DATE ISSUED DATE FINALED 1529 SHERWOD WAY, L 2, B 1, BRITTANY STH 11/85 3/86 4875 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 6, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 11/85 NOT COMPLETE 4867 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 4, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 12/85 NOT COMPLETE 4857 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 2, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 12/85 NOT COMPLETE 4868 WINDSOR CT, L 10, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 12/85 NOT COMPLETE 2 • • MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: CRAIG E KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN DATE: MARCH 12, 1986 SUBJECT: TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC DUMP SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BRITTANY 8TH ADDITION In response to a report of an unauthorized dump site by Tollefson Builders, I was requested to accompany a Dakota County employee on an inspection of the site. Although Tollefson Builders have a grading permit for the proposed Brittany 9th Addition, the grading plan does not indicate a disposal site of any kind in or near this area. Further more, it is difficult to determine exactly where the property lines of Brittany 9th Addition are, and it is possible that portions of this site are not located on his property. This dump site was expected to contain building debris from the local Brittany Additions but, considering the size, it could very easily contain debris from building sites outside of the City of Eagan. The contents of debris went beyond typical building material to include tires, empty containers, cans, glass and various types of household garbage. At the time of our inspection, it looked like Tollefson employees were attempting to bury this site, but were unable to complete the job due to the equipment getting stuck. The County has not determined what type of action will be taken at this time, but will keep us updated on this issue and copy the City ® on all correspondence. CK/jj cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works 75 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 CERTIFIED MAIL March 14, 1986 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS 12617 FAIRGREEN AVENUE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 BEA BLOMQUIST Mi THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH MIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER COun ll Members THOMAS HEDGES City Adminisrramr EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Dump Site North of Brittany 8th & Brittany 9th Additions CEASE AND DESIST ORDER Dear Mr. Tollefson: On March 11, 1986, I was requested to accompany Dakota County on an inspection of a dump site in the above-mentioned area. During this inspection, we found Tollefson Builders to be in violation of several City Ordinances. The City of Eagan hereby orders you to CEASE AND DESIST all grading and dumping of all unauthorized material in this area. Continued dumping will be in further violation and subject to penalty as prescribed by City Ordinances. You will also be required to clean up and restore this area to its previous condition. If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Z cerely-�� Craig E. Knudsen Engineering Technician CEK/jj cc: Thomas L .Hedges; ity Administrator Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Paul Hauge, City Attorney JoEllen Fredlund, Environmental Health Specialist All THE LONE OAK TREE. - . THE SYMBOL OA STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY t'u s� b 21933 �° 006(tiL Po_mrOUnEOs -AsS Hej SSIZZ m4 zcH SC')_(o� 7 ssl22 _ This _is �.�^e��_SV�c�� �nc1�:c9-__5urmmau�_ �rob.lam,�S_ ►�(���-� Tl 3�n_Idrs__v�utihi-lL_ASS,au ueaP—rn- m_i . • 0 WL lew (aw _ _o'--vt l7 (at(Gtiv -- -----z �220._� a-- - -QyteG.�. uWeQvP�Onea,�q_ -l C&3UPA5Z 1-1e�"V\tAf Yq�NPCp,U L 6>0 , ..— - LEA _rojl(�_ I I e I __�,_k L RE IL ��/ �75--To--laAdsc# #.230 SZWe4 _QL 0 dy Ply 11 14E6-rHt7z__— hi'1 _beizv� 3YX Wks- dL IOU! l -Agwl 0- • mvjlie --- --- ----- - - , os -- - P, 1' Mr. & Mrs. Donald M 1623 Norwood Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City of Eagan City Hall Eagan, MN. 55.121 Dear Mr. Hedges: February 28, 1986 Gullett City Administrator This letter is in reference to our home at 1623 Norwood Drive, Eagan, a Tollefson Home in Brittany Estates. I am writing this letter to inform you of my recent dissatisfation with Carl Tollefson's work. In September, 1985 our kitchen floor in front of the sliding glass door on the north side caved in. I contacted Carl's dffice to see if they could tell me what happened. They sent down a worker to look at it in October. He said it could be several things that happenedy i.e. a vent originally cut out and moved and never closed properly, or water could have got in and caused the subfloor to rot. He said Carl would probably say "water got in and caused it to rot" without even seeing it. John from Bernco Corp. told us the first year we were in the.house that we had a problem with the installation of the door because it would not open and close properly. He measured a gap in the door to be almost 3/4 inch difference at the bottom from the top. This gap caused frost to build up in the winter and cold air to blow through. I contacted the Attorney General's office and talked to Joan. She said there was a state statute which protected new homeowners against such problems for ten years. She said I should contact the City Building Inspector, which I did. I finally got in touch with Mr. Dale Peterson to see what kind of recourse I had. He was sympathetic but knew of no action he could take. Why should I be responsible for fixing a problem that was never done right to begin with. I believe Carl Tollefson is responsible for reinstallation of the door, repairing the subfloor, and whatever else is involved to correct this problem. I was told that Carl would not fix this "problem" as he was "too busy" with all his new construction and it may take up to two years to get handled, if at all. I was also told Carl may not fit it at all but just say "sue me". I was never able to personally talk to Carl, just given the run around by his office. 'W r 1 U • Feb. 28, 1986 Page 2 I would like to see this "major" problem fixed by Tollefson this time as I have corrected enough of his mistakes in the past at my expense. Two other problems involving the exterior paint on the front of my house and our driveway were never corrected properly. I finally gave up. Please give your attention to this letter. I pay high taxes on my home but the quality of work does not make it worth as much as I am assessed. I was the first house to close in Brittany and was told I got the cheap subcontractors at the time. Thank you for any help and cooperation you can give me. rSincerely, 0 "J6) Donald and Sharron Cullett MJV Agenda Information Memo March 19, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page E'igh'teen SPECIAL PERMIT/NURSERY SCHOOL B. Special Permit to Allow a Nursery School for No More Than 10 Students Located at 1658 Woodgate Lane --An application was submitted to the Planning Department requesting a special permit to allow a ten -student nursery school in an R-1, Single -Family district. At the last City Council meeting this item was continued to allow for submission of a petition by the adjacent neighbors. There are four (4') property owners who have signed the petition that did not object, while one person has indicated an objection. For a copy of the report and a petition, refer to pages o13 through 9115- ACTION 1 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the special permit application as presented. • P SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL PERMIT BURTON & MAYONE EPPEN BLOCK 1, LOT 12, ADDITION R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) MARCH 4, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 . REPORTED BY: JIM STURM MALLARD PARK 2ND APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a special permit to allow a 10 student nursery school in an R-1 single family district. COMMENTS: The applicants currently have 10 students enrolled in their nursery school at 2057 Garnet La and have been doing so for 10 years.. Day. care facilities in R-1 districts require ' Special Use _Permits for 7 - 10 children and Conditional Use Permits for 11 plus children. The nursery school is somewhat different than the traditional day care facility in that there are 2 sessions as opposed to the all day service. The Eppen's plan on moving to the Mallard Park Addition in the near future and do not plan on expanding the nursery school in size. If approved, the.special permit shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. ROBE CONSULTINO ENOINElflS ENGINEERING PLANNERS and LAND ,URVETORS COMPRNY INC. OK 32/Ft2j', 1000 EAST 1461h STREET. eURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 5533T PM 432'3000 Cer-Wi ctzi Sur -tee y i4o41—s�r�et=ort LOT 12, BLOCK // MALLARD PARK 21JD ADD17 DAKOTA COUMTY, MINNESOTA he \ 4% NORTH SCALE 1"P jO 9� yti� SS. Da 30' FROUT' SU/LD/Al6 / \, � , Z % SETBACK LIA/E // /\ \`O !�/ _N 79 '99 / 0 ,y / s;'N p / ••'; �q� `9` 230 30.35 Ae- •�'� 0�\MO /•10.0 J fRAINg4E AND / rS Da• OD � 'i, l;q�l/J• ITILITY EASEMENT Y r9 �•N% 1e Oab/• ,/ O J�: �• J J 'A' 1 %wr 5lu /mJ ^� < LOT I2 ' N I / v' DENOTES EYISTIN6 ELEVAT/ON 959.7) DENOTES 9ROA7SSO ELEVAT/DA/ S (9.37.e) L /S- - INDICATES DIRECTION OF IQ3i9: •y _// (977.7) SURFACE DRAINA6E 40 � N 8a.2o, 36 939.95 r FiN/SHED &W,96E FLOOR ELEVA W I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a tract .of land as shown'and described hereon.. As prepared by me on this 3o day of OC TORE P. 985% u,_% Minn. nag. No.leaF O % /,/ v 0 a -7 -Le -(I �e-U-11, ty. _�--t-•� r� 61 ' 65 U Agenda Information Memo March 19, 196'6, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen STREET NAME DESIGNATZON C. Street Name Designation, I -35E & Deerwood Drive Frontage Road --On January 7 and March 4, the City Council continued consideration of a request from Mr. Leo Murphy to rename the I - 35E Frontage Road north of Deerwood Drive to "Murphy Street". Comments received from•the only other affected property owner, Mr. Ed Dunn, indicated a preference for "Murphy Parkway". This item has been continued to receive comments from the Advisory, Planning, Park & Recreation Commissions, the most recent review being March 6. While the Park & Recreation Naming Subcommittee submitted the most names for consideration, there was no real strong support for any particular name for Council's consideration. The following is a final list of names from all suggestions submitted: Murphy Street, Murphy Parkway, Long 'Lake Lane, Cronkin Lane, and Deerwood Lane. The Public Works Director will be background pertaining to each of at the March 19 meeting. available to provide additional the above -referenced suggestions ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the street name designation for I -35E Frontage Road north of Deerwood Drive. Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS D. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission -- At the last regular City Council meeting held on March 4, 1986, all three (3) Gun Club Lake Watershed Management appointments that were made at the February 18, 1986, City Council meeting were rescinded by City Council action. Since the March 4, City Council meeting., City Councilmember Egan is recommending Richard Ney, who resides at 4497 Oak Chase Lane, City Councilmember Smith is recommending Wes Lane who resides at the Carriage Hills condominium complex, City Councilmember Wachter has expressed a personal interest in serving a member of the Commission and an application was received from Scott Merkley, who resides at 4389 aSunrise Drive. A copy of that letter is enclosed on page 0g for your reference- Also, Director of Public Works Colbert would continue to be a candidate for appointment to the Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the appointment of three (3) residents to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management organization. Z March 11, 1986 THOMAS L HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Gun Club Lake Watershed Manaaement Organization Dear Mr. Hedges: ®It my understanding that the City Council is currently going through the process of reviewing applications for appointment.to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization. I would like to express my interest in being considered for such an appointment. I feel my past work experience with the Engineering Division of the City of Eagan and my previous appointment as an Alternate to the Planning Commission would qualify me for serious consideration for the technical knowledge and community involvement, which I am sure would be prerequisites for an appointment. Also, I am very interested in the preservation and management of our natural water resources, especially as it might affect the City of Eagan. Although I am no longer employed by the City of Eagan, I currently reside in the City and have every intention and desire of becoming an integral part of this community through my recent purchase of a • permanent residence. I hope that you and the City Council will give serious consideration to my application and will provide me with the opportunity to provide a service for our community. I will anxiously await your response or request for additional information as may be necessary. Sincerely, Scott Merkley EiJT 4389 Sunrise Drive Eagan MN 55122 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One PRELIMSNARY PLAT & REZONING/EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION A. Preliminary Plat for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition for Six Lots on Approximately 23 Acres and a Rezoning from NB, GB & R-4 to Commercial Planned Development --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on February 25, 1986, to consider two (2) applications presented by the Opus Corporation. The first application was a rezoning from NB, GB & R-4 to a commercial planned development while the second application consists' of a preliminary plat • entitled Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the application with the following additions to the Planning Department report: 1. Planned Development be for a five-year period. 2. Each of the commercial lots be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Landscaping be included for the Residence Inn and the overall planned development. For additional information on this proposed development, refer to the Planning and Engineer ng Department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages90 through /. tThe Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met at its March 6 meeting and is recommending: . 1) A cash dedication be required for the platted lots consistent with the City's policy and 2) that the developer provide a 7'5-foot—wide trail easement along LeMay Lake to provide for a potential future trail. For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission on this item, refer to pages 103 through /D % ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON 'THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning and 2) the preliminary plat for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition. i0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION (RESIDENCE INN) LOCATION: PART OF THE NWq, SECTION 10 EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) '& R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 20, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The first application is a request to rezone from NB (neighborhood business), GB (general business) & R-4 '(residential multiple) to a commercial planned development • which would include some neighborhood business uses - restaurants, retail sales and gasoline service facilities. LB (limited business) use for a 72,000 S.F. office facility and RB (roadside business) which would allow 120 room hotel - Residence Inn. This entire commercial planned development would consist of approx. 20.5 acres. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this 20 acre parcel as an LB (limited business) site and some of the uses fit the LB category, however, most uses are proposed asa higher intensity use than an LB. Some of the commercial/retail uses are in conformance with the existing zoning on the property. One of the major differences is that the southerly triangle of the property is presently zoned R-4 (residential multiple) and the proposed office building would be. consistent with the Comp. Guide designation of LB. The majority of the retail is of a higher intensity than the LB (limited business) district. - The -one use that does not fit the zoning or the Comp.. Guide would be the 120 room Residence Inn Hotel facility. It has been integrat- ed into the overall commercial plan through the planned development process. SITE PLAN: The property is bordered by Lone Oak Rd on the north, 35-E on the east, LeMay Lake Apartments on the west & LeMay Lake to the south. The Opus Corp. submitted an overall sketch plan _ as to how they foresee this parcel developing with the detailed development plan of LeMay Lake to the west. It was decided that only one access would be used to service both the multiple project and the proposed commercial project on the east. . This 20 acre parcel would have access provided by a loop street where six lots would be created for six _ specific uses. These uses are . as follows: 1. A service station facility of approx. 3,000 S.F. 2. Retail strip commercial facility approx. 22,000 3. Three restaurant facilities ranging from 10,000 S.F. to 4,000 S.F. both being the sit down & fast food category. qo OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD FEBRUARY 25, 1986 PAGE 2 4. A Residence Inn containing approx. 120 rooms. 4.4 acres and having 5. An office building of four floors and 72,000 S.F. The applicant is proposing to plat 6 individual lots of which the major emphasis will be on the lot containing the Residence Inn. The detailed site plan, lot 1, block 1, will consist of 4.4 acres and contain a 120 room Residence Inn with lot coverage 21.6%. The ,Residence Inn facility is an extended stay hotel of which the average length of stay would be seven days. The site plan consists of 16 buildings, 15 eight-plex units and one gate house which contains approx. 3,000 S.F. for a common office meeting area to be used by the residents. The gate house will have a full basement for storage and laundry facilities available for the residents use. The buildings are clustered around an interior courtyard effect with general parking and circulation on the outside around the perimeter of the lot area. As mentioned ,earlier, each unit will be a suite. One out of every four will be a penthouse suite which would contain two bedrooms, two bathrooms, cooking facilities and a fireplace. It is staff's understanding that all units will contain fireplaces and all units will have full,cooking facilities. The required parking for the 120 unit hotel would be 135 parking spaces. The applicants are proposing 144, approx. 9 above City Code requirements. There will be a 20' green area from the interior loop roadway with 3 accesses onto Eagandale Place. Good circulation for this facility has been provided. They are providing a common court walk area with an outdoor swimming pool and hot tub facility. The buildings are proposed to be two story, gabled roof with • each unit having an exterior entrance from the courtyard area., The setbacks between buildings are approx. 10' to allow pedestrian movement. This setback between buildings is being reviewed by, the Bldg. Dept. so that setbacks for fire protection are met. The applicants will ,be present at the Feb. 25th meeting with a slide presentation to better inform the APC on the concept of the Residence Inn. At the present time, the major emphasis of this proposed development is placed on the Residence Inn. The other 5 lots are set up to be platted as lots, however, the detailed site plans will be reviewed prior. to any of the building permits being issued. The applicants have indicated that as a condition of this plat, the site plans could be reviewed by the APC and City Council prior to permits. Consequently, no detailed review has been done on the remaining lots with the exception that when lot 4 is platted, it should be split into two in order to accomodate the two buildings proposed. ^� OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD PAGE 3 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant graded most of this site using excess material generated from the I-35E_construction in 1983 and 1984. The proposed grading plan is basically a refinement on the existing site grades to accommodate more specific uses as proposed by the applicant. The preliminary grading plan the applicant submitted appears to meet all City codes for grading. This area is located within Major Drainage District D as shown on Figure 1. The site development grading on this site will require construction of storm sewer throughout the site to handle parking lot drainage and street drainage: Under City Contract 85-7, the City installed a 54" storm sewer line down Eagandale Place to provide adequate capacity for upstream areas and this site. This ® new line is suited to handle the flow from this proposed development site. The City will not have to construct any new trunk storm sewer as a result of this development going in. UTILITIES: Also under City Contract 85-7, the City installed water main and sanitary sewer within Eagandale Place. If the City approves this project, then the water main and sanitary sewer can easily be extended into this site to provide necessary service for this area. Staff would like to see the water main from Eagandale Place extended easterly to connect to an existing 12" water main located near the northeast corner of this proposed development as a condition of approval. This connection would benefit this area by improving water flow characteristics. ® STREETS: Eagandale Place is an existing City street built to its ultimate design which provides access to this proposed development. The City also constructed this street under Contract 85-7. It will be this development's responsibility to remove the existing turn -around on Eagandale Place and extend the street in a circular fashion to loop back onto itself as shown on the proposed submittal drawings. Staff recommends this roadway width be 36' wide with no parking on either side. Staff recommends that driveways on the internal street for future developments meet the following criteria: 1. Where possible, driveways opposite each other shall line up. 2. A 75' offset will be required for driveways which cannot be made to line up. 3. There shall be.a minimum of a 100' separation between driveway center lines on the same side of the street. OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD PAGE 4 PERMITS: The applicant for this development will be responsible for obtaining the following permits or approvals if the applicant chooses to install public utilities under a private contract: 1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC sanitary sewer extension approval. 3. Mn. Dept. of Health water main extension approval. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The 60' right-of-way the applicant is proposing to dedicate for Eagandale Place presents no problems for staff because they are dedicating an additional 20' drainage and utility easement adjacent to the public right-of-way. In addition to the easements required by code, this development will be responsible for dedicating a 20' easement over the water main segment looping to the northeast of this site, which is not located within City right-of-way. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the City's assessment records, portions of Parcels 010-01 and 020-26 and all of Parcels 030-26 and 010-04 were assessed at the multiple rate for trunk area water assessments in 1976 for Improvement #179. Staff proposes that this development be responsible for the upgrading of the trunk water assessment from multiple family to commercial/industrial over the portion of Parcel 020-26 that was assessed at the multiple rate and also over the entire portion of 030-26 and 010-04, which were also assessed at the multiple rate. The following table summarizes the amounts based on 1986 rates. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd 1.986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Water Area Upgrading 010-04 0.14 Ac $1,830/Ac (1) $ 256 020-26 3.44 Ac 1,830/Ac (1) 6,295 030-26 5.43 Ac 1,830/Ac (1) 9,937 ` TOTAL $16,488 (')Commercial/Industrial Rate - Multiple Rate q3 40 o • • OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD PAGE 5 Staff feels that Parcel 010-01 has fulfilled its obligations regarding trunk area storm sewer. Staff's reasoning is because the original parcel contained 20 acres with 17.6 acres being assessed at the commercial/industrial rate and the remaining 2.4 acres being assessed at the multiple rate. It would be extremely difficult to determine where the multiple rate was assessed in relation to the residue left after the I -35E taking. Because of the small area (1.92 Acres net) assessed at the multiple rate, staff feels the remaining parcel of 010-01 has fulfilled its obligation for trunk area water main assessments. This development will be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of internal utilities and streets. 1 CONDITIONS: 1. A Planned Development Agreement be entered into & the concept plan for the six (6) lots be the exhibit to be followed for the Planned Development. 2. This development is impacted by the Shoreline Zoning Ordinance and shall be reviewed by the Dept, of Natural Resources for their comments prior to final plat approval. 3. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail access and park dedication. 4. A determination shall be made as to whether a Comp. Plan amendment would be required for this development proposal. 5, Any Conditional Use Permits such as 4 story buildings, pylon signs or drive-thru facilities shall be made with separate • applications, 6. An overall architectural theme shall be established and control- led signage should be.taken for this total development. 7. All plat conditions shall be adhered to, 8. This development will be responsible for complying with all applicable general engineering conditions. 9. This development will be responsible for looping the water main within Eagandale Place to the existing water main at the northeast corner of this development. 10. This development shall dedicate a 60' right-of-way for Eagandale Place. 11. A 20' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent • all public right-of-way. 12. A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated over the water main not located within City right-of-way.. 13. All driveways which cannot be made to line up shall be offset a minimum of 75' and there shall be a minimum of 100' separation between driveways. 14. No driveway shall be constructed closer than 100' to the curb line extension of the street intersection. 15. This development will be responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals and permits if utilities are constructed under private contract. „ 16. This development shall be responsible for the trunk water area upgrading assessment at the rates in effect at the , time of final platting. 17. This development shall be responsible for the costs of all internal streets and utilities. C�tJ' mn Sw CWNIFI taus \ t[xuox � \NCOXp�N^,NEC Idl, 4.2 �ot�tnal,� I�aY ►� 2� P�nr(t� PD 74-7 RB A /. OY. •• ', � N tJ8 � R-4 A PD A CE N I Ffi iNDJ>?. r !i•.l_ FA RK i •iiel q q.=. A. � (� i I LIA ITT =.. � _ — CD r„ injigat1` i�•I cq �= F\ ' !-t it �--------- Hit'; IT ________tITlit i � 11';:1:1 = ; e ---i r• � 1 _'7 (-� �'G.. V ; � _/ —.e 11:11 11 111M mi i _i' If . •yir "1 i � � ! � . r :i11 I u 1 �• i .::!ta ! \',SII �� i ,) ���� i i LII e• .r „� .. m G) D Z D r m Lemay Lake [EAMMURIE COMER LEMAY LAKE DEVELOPMENT ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN - IOPUS CORPORATION a N 0 100 goo 300 A. NORTH 'Aw INC JAX 00. 1110 ro0 TNIRO eTARIT eOM , YIXXeAOOIIR ax 0]1.0100 I�1 R. wo, I Eagandele Blvd. - -- Smmlee 81et10A 2,000 S0. FL .0 Acres I t Ree ewe Ol 10,000 S0. FL 2.5 Aero j Retell 22,000 Sp. FL 2.4 Awe im N 15JANUARY 1966 RESIDENCE INN _Y EAGAN, MINNESOTA AN1(OPSUNSKY KRANK E%PICKSON -_ .......... . �..� �. ARCHITECTS RCNECKS C. • SITE PLAN RESIDENCE INN EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 SITE LOCATION .1_ •, I IT A V"21 '-)a Y) j -N 3w;53wd Z+ 31`d �1NyytjtJ i. - z . .. ........ Z V- /i '1 / LLI / 1 ilk It ! rLY Ld CO CA I is tit ilk It ! Ld m m •1 p� FIG. +1 city of eagan -" a standard - STORM SEWER approved-: plate #: 0 PUBLIC _ WORKS DEPARTMENJ MASTER PLAN • • SUITE RUILDING (COVERED. ST AIRS) ii- GROUND FLOOR PLAN ..STUDIO SUITE BUIL®INC APC Minutes February 25, 1986 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to bring the area into compliance with City Code. Screening should be encouraged to lessen the impact of these two tanks: All voted aye. EAGANDALE LeMAY LAKE 2nd ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing for the preliminary plat and rezoning of 20.5 acres in part of the northwest quarter of Section 10 from NB (Neighborhood Business), GB (General Business) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to Commercial Planned Development with a preliminary plat consisting of 6 lots including a 120 -room hotel by Residence Inn on a 4.36 acre lot, was convened by Vice Chairman Harrison. City Planner Dale Runkle made a brief introduction of the proposals. Mr. Bob Worthington of Opus described the development, indicating that a request for planned development was being made with all future phases, other than the hotel, subject to review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. John Meyer of Residence Inn, Inc. and Greg Hollankamp of K. K. & E., Inc., architects, were also present to describe the specific plans for the Residence Inn facility. Questions were raised in regard to traffic and potential use of LeMay Lake. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of the entire parcel to planned development with a five-year completion period, subject to the following conditions: 1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into and the concept plan for the six (6) lots shall be the exhibit to be followed for the Planned Development. _ 2. This development is impacted by the Shoreline Zoning Ordinance and shall be reviewed by the Dept. of Natural Resources for their comments prior to final plat approval. 3. The plat shall be subject to the ParkCommission's review for trail access and park dedication. 4. A determination shall be made as to whether a Comp. Plan amendment would be required for this development proposal. 5. Any conditional use permits such as 4 story buildings, pylon signs or drive-thru facilities shall be made with separate applications. 6. An overall architectural theme shall be established and controlled signage should be taken for this total development. 7. This development shall be responsible for looping the water main within Eagandale Place to the existing water main at the northeast corner of this development. 8. This development shall dedicate a 60 foot right-of-way for Eagandale Place. /Q_�5 2 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 9. A 20 foot arainagw and utility easement, shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way. 10. A 20 foot utility easement shall be aedicatea over the water main not located within City right-of-way. 11. All driveways which cannot be made to line up shall be offset a minimum of 75 feet and there shall be a minimum of 100 feet separation between driveways. 12.. No driveway shall be constructed closer than 100 feet to the curb Line extension of the street intersection. 13. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals and permits if utilities are constructed unaer private contract. ® 14. This development shall be responsible for the trunk water area upgrading assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 15. This development shall be responsible for the costs of all internal streets and utilities. All voted yes. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be enterea into and the concept plan for the six (6) lots shall be the exhibit to be followed for the Planned Development. 2. This development is impacted by the Shoreline Zoning ordinance and shall be reviewed by the Dept. of Natural Resources for their comments prior to final plat approval. 3. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail access and park dedication. 4. Any Conditional Use Permits such as 4 story buildings, pylon signs or drive-thru facilities shall be made with separate applications. 5. All plat conditions shall be adhered to. 6. This development will be responsible for complying with all applicable general engineering ana planning conditions. 7. A 20 foot.drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way. B. A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated over the water main not located within City right-of-way. 3 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 9. All driveways which cannot be made to line up shall be offset a minimum of 75 feet and there shall be a minimum of 100 feet separation between driveways. 10. No driveway shall be constructed closer than 100 feet to the curb line extension of the street intersection. 11. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals and permits if utilities are constructed under private contract. 12. This development shall be responsible for the trunk water area upgrading assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 13. This development shall be responsible for the costs of all internal streets and utilities. 14. An approved landscaping plan with adequate bond valid for a period of • at least one year or one growing season, whichever is later, shall be required. All members voted in favor. LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH 3RD ADDITION — PRELIMINARY PLAT The vice chairman then commenced the public hearing forthe application of Frontier Midwest for a preliminary plat of Lexington Place South 3rd -Addition in the southwest quarter of Section 14, consisting of 10 single family lots in the Lexington South Planned Development north of_Wescott Road, and east of Lexington Avenue. Dale Runkle provided a brief history of the planned development and advised that the lots were 10,000 to 12,000 square feet, which was larger than the surrounding lots. It was also indicated that the Park Commission had not reviewed the proposed preliminary plat. Mr. Mark Parranto was present on behalf of Frontier Midwest as were owners of existing Orrin Thompson lots and homes bordering the proposed preliminary plat. Discussion centered around the proper use of the parcel, which had been designated as proposed private open space, to be controlled by a homeowners association which was never formed by Orrin Thompson. Mr. Parranto indicated that originally Orrin Thompson had plans for a community area with association controlled facilities such as swimming pool and/or tennis courts which had been abandoned as part of their normal development. Frontier Midwest had acquired the property as part of a larger parcel from Orrin Thompson. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the matter to the next regular meeting with the following directives: 1. Staff and/or legal counsel shall provide an opinion as to the legality of changing the anticipated use in the PUD and the impact of possible tax forfeiture. 2. Verification as to whether the area is a drainage area. 3. A review of the proposal by the Parks and Recreation Department. All voted affirmatively. 1,974 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two PRELIMINARY PLAT& REZONING/PARK KNOLL ADDITION B. Preliminary Plat for Park Knoll Addition and Rezoning from R-2' to R-1 on Outlot B, Oakwood Heights Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on Tuesday, February 5, to consider a rezoning application of 6.6 acres from R-2 to R-1 and a preliminary plat for 15 lots referenced as Park Knoll Addition in the area commonly known as the Oakwood Heights Addition. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the rezoning and the preliminary plat subject to the staff report, noting that the condition regarding storm sewer be addressed with a satisfactory solution can be resolved on this issue. It was also recommended by the Planning Commission that the area between the townhouse development and single-family lots be graded, restored and landscaped to a suitable plan. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning a/n0dq�' Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages /�j�/ through - �— It was recommended by the Parks & Recreation Commission that the Park Knoll Addition is a part of the Lexington South PUD which has previously completed its parkland dedication requirements. The Commission did, however, recommend the developer be responsible for the placement of an 8 -foot, bituminous trailway on Wilderness Run Road. For additional information regarding action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission on this item, refer to page(s) ZZO• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED .ON THIS ITEM: To approve .or deny 1) the rezoning from R-2 PD to R-1., and 2) a preliminary plat for 15 single-family lots., /Q O CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING PARK KNOLL ADDITION APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES, INC LOCATION: SE4, SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (LEXINGTON SOUTH) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 14, 1986 . REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING • APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted request- ing 1) a rezoning of 6.6 acres from R-2 (double) to R-1 (single family) and 2) a preliminary plat for 15 lots in the area known as the Oakwood Heights Addition. ZONING & LAND USE This site is located north of Wilderness Run Rd and is bounded by Trapp Farm Park to the east, the Highline Trail to the north and west and the Oakwood Heights Addition also to the west. The 15 lots will give the Park Knoll Addition a density of 2.2 units per acre. The existing zoning would have allowed for 39 units at 6 units per acre. All lots meet or exceed the 12,000 S. F. code requirement and some along the Highline Trail are greater than 20,000 S.F. SITE PLANNING: Two of the proposed units in the Oakwood Heights Addition have been completed. This new plat will eliminate 2 of the existing building pads by creating 3 single family lots. . All 15 lots will have access onto a loop, road (Park Knoll Drive). This wooded site, consisting primarily of oaks, ,.falls towards the south with a fairly uniform 208 slope. Since the soil is ' quite sandy, grading on this hillside will be kept to a minimum. The lots, on the north side of the Park Knoll Dr have been designed so that a ravine between lots 7 & 8 will remain untouched. As a result, not all of the lots meet the 85' minimum width at the setback line. Variances for a 20' setback on lots 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 are desired to reduce the grading of the hillside. The setback along wilderness Run Rd is 35' and the existing buildings in the Oakwood Heights Addition will meet code setback requirements. PARK KNOLL ADDITION �•, PAGE 2 GRADING: Prior to this preliminary plat application, the City approved a preliminary plat called the Oakwood Heights Addition. This development requires substantial grading on the very steep northerly hillside of this area to provide for townhome/condominium sites. This development proposes single- family use and staying away from any grading on the very steep northerly side hill. Not having to disturb the side hill will save a great deal of erosion problems in the future because of the sandy soils located in that side hill. The applicant's proposed grading plan is feasible and in _ accordance with City guidelines and codes. The applicant shall finalize the preliminary grading plan and submit it along with an erosion and sediment control plan prior to final plat approval. DRAINAGE: The applicant proposes to preserve the existing westerly drainage patterns over this parcel. To do this, the applicant will have to extend an existing 15" storm sewer pipe located near the northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 2. This storm sewer runs through the Oakwood Heights 1st Addition into Pond LP- • 50. As you can see from Figure 1, Pond LP -50 has an existing outlet to the south under Wilderness Run Road into Pond LP -46. However, Pond LP -46 presently has no outlet and staff has received several complaints from adjacent property owners regarding its high water level. The most recent water elevation staff has on this pond is 883.5 taken in November of 1985. This is 2 ft. over the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan's high water level. -1� Council is considering the storm sewer outlets for Pond LP -46 along with other ponds in the Holland Lake area under Project @444R. The Council will probably be making_a decision regarding Project @444R in April, 1986. Because of the importance of installing a control gravity outlet to Pond LP -46 to control the water level prior to adding any more runoff from additional developments, staff recommends that a condition of final plat approval be that Council approve Project 4444R. • UTILITIES: Trunk water main and trunk sanitary sewer are in place within Wilderness Run Road. These lines have the necessary capacity and depth to provide service to this development. STREETS: Wilderness Run Road abutts the southerly boundary of this proposed development. The City's Master Thoroughfare Plan classifies this roadway as a community collector street. ..Presently, Wilderness Run Road is constructed to an interim 34' wide roadway. When warranted, Wilderness Run Road will be upgraded to a 44' wide roadway with concrete curb and gutter and built to 9 -ton standards. Part of the City collector street standards require the installation of a trailway along it. For Wilderness Run Road, the location for this trailway is along the north side. This trailway should be the responsibility of this development. Although the internal "U -Shaped" street will provide good access and circulation for this small development, staff recommends against providing two bubbles at the corners. These bubbles will /oy2. PARK KNOLL ADDITION PAGE 3 not provide any benefit to any of the lots and will create additional pavement area for future City maintenance. Figure 2 shows what this street would look like with a 70' outside radius and 20' inside radius. Although the applicant did not show the intersection of Sudberry Lane with wilderness Run Road on his submittal drawings, staff researched this and found that Sudberry Lane is located about 125' east of the west intersection of Park Knoll Drive and 205' west of the east intersection of Park Knoll Drive and Wilderness Run Road. The City code requires a minimum of a 125' offset •- between center lines. While the preliminary plat indicates sufficient distance, the Council should not approve the final plat until the exact distance is known. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development will be responsible for dedicating a 40' half right-of-way for Wilderness Run Road. The 50' full right-of-way for Park Knoll Drive meets minimum City - codes and is acceptable to staff on the condition of eliminating • the bubbles and providing a 20' radius for right-of-way on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1. This 20' radius is necessary because when building a roadway within a narrow right-of-way, the curb radius would be located as such that no boulevard would exist between the lot corner and the street. The applicant shall provide a 20' utility easement for the storm sewer between Lots 3 and 4. PERMITS: The applicant will be responsible for obtaining approvals or permits from the following agencies: 1. MPCA - sanitary sewer extension. - 2. Mn. Dept. of Health - water main -extension. 3. MWCC - sanitary sewer extension. ASSESSMENTS: Our assessment records indicate that the City has • assessed all trunk area related assessments, including lateral benefit, to this parcel, with the exception of trunk area storm sewer. As a condition of final plat approval, this development shall accept its responsibility for trunk area storm sewer on the net area of this proposed development. 'At 1986 rates, this would amount to $12,500 (250,000 sq. ft. x $0.05 per square foot). Staff will determine the final assessment amount based on the final plat area and the rates in effect at the time of final platting. All costs associated with internal streets and utilities, plus the trailway construction along Wilderness Run Road, will be the sole responsibility of this development. /o% b PARK KNOLL ADDITION PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. This development shall comply with all applicable general engineering conditions. 2. Council shall approve Project #444R to provide a positive gravity outlet from Pond LP -46 prior to final plat approval. 3. Park Knoll Drive shall not contain any "bubbles" and the intersection with Wilderness Run Road shall be offset at least 125' from the center line of Sudberry Lane. 4. The right-of-way have a 20' radius on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 where Park Knoll Drive turns. 5. This development shall dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Wilderness Run Road and a 50' full right-of-way for Park Knoll Drive. - 6. This development shall dedicate a 20' drainage and utility easement over the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2. 7. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for the costs for the internal streets and utilities and also for the trailway along Wilderness Run Road. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits or approvals as referenced in the report. 10. A blanket variance be granted for a 20' front setback for lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. 11. All standard plat conditions shall'be adhered to. •I • - 2 - 5 JP- 7. iipL 1' 0559.9' 9M2 903.0 903.0 _- - j. 111fAD 3' LP -22 9a0 13 ' LP -66 P-17 P 17 ................ ................ ................ ........... ..... SUBJECT PARCEL G o FIG. +.1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate tandar#a PUBLIC _ n DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN 9 0 :Y n 999 Sao= +z 127 999 qyb `� x • IZ�� 7 , 27t %G7 t � 929 9iy 9939 3p (A//J'. ZI,l � ��11y. . 1131 F-Lp/o1 726 9"/j �71p 92p 929 9l�/ \ YJB rY2 II • 13��b `� q�\ Sir \ \ 9$ \ � Io 922 9N \ 926 9i� 9JL ` 4 i � A qo{ v, • w 9or Z L Ali . 9og / � - I909 •� Y Jt qOt 7. 0 qr0 t qAAOO • c I 090 99b k \ I 900 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 EAGANDALE LeMAY LAKE 2nd ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT At the request of the vice chairman, the Planning Commission reconsidered its motion regarding the preliminary plat for this development as follows: Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to clarify the prior motion to indicate that the planning commission has recommended approval of the preliminary plat of 20.5 acres into 6 lots with a PUD designation, one lot as a Residence Inn, and the remaining lots subject to future review. All voted in favor. PARK KNOLL ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING Vice Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing to hear the applications of Tri -Lana Properties, Inc. requesting a rezoning of 6.6 acres from R-2 to R-1 and a preliminary plat for 15 lots in an area known as Oakwood • Heights Addition in the southeast quarter of Section 26.. City Planner Runkle introduced the application including a history of the plat wherein the original developer•haa not carried through with the development of a townhouse type use. Mr. Brad Swenson was present representing of Tri -Lana Properties, Inc. and described the single family proposal, specifically as it related to wooded areas and drainage. Neighboring residents were present to question the clean up and removal of blacktop and alignment of streets. The developer was also proposing on-site storage of runoff waters, if necessary, to avoid holding up development until the completion of Project #444R. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 with the stipulation that the reduction in density could not be recaptured within other future developments in Lexington South PD. All voted yea. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion' to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. This development shall comply with applicable general engineering conditions. ' 2. Council shall approve Project #444R to provide a positive gravity outlet from Pond LP -46 prior to final plat approval or City approved temporary storage shall be provided on the site. 3. Park Knoll Drive shall not contain any "bubbles" and the intersection with Wilderness Run Road shall be offset at least 125 feet from the center line of Sudberry Lane. 4. The right-of-way shall have a 20 foot radius on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 where Park Knoll Drive turns. 5. This development shall dedicate a 40 foot half right-of-way for Wilderness Run Road and a 50 foot full right-of-way for Park Knoll Drive. 6. This development shall dedicate a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2. //D 5 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 7. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for the costs for the internal streets and utilities and'ialso for the trailway along Wilderness Run. Road. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits or approvals as referenced in the report. 10. A blanket variance shall be granted for a 20 foot front setback for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. The debris in the northeast portion of the plat shall be cleaned up. ® 13. All lots shall maintain as near as possible, the required 50 foot street frontage. All members voted affirmatively. BURGER KING CORPORATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison in regard to the application of Burger King Corporation for conditional use permits for - the pylon sign and drive-through restaurant located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition in part of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. Dale Runkle opened the presentation, advising that the applicant had worked with the City to provide at least 7 revisions to the plans. Mr. Randy Shaper, representing the applicant, introduced the New Image 87 Plan with three times the normal landscaping, advising however that landscaping would be reduced along the westerly portion of the property to avoid interference with the utility easement. It was noted that the entrance nearest the corner of the intersecting streets had been realigned at an angle to meet engineering requirements. It appeared that 18 foot long parking stalls were being provided based upon the capability for two foot overhang. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a drive-through facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. No building shall take place until the final platting process is completed. 2. Concrete curb and gutter shall be provided in the parking.area. 3. The easterly one-way driveway access from Town Centre Drive shall be located 70 feet from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue. 4. Trees along the utility easement area may be eliminated as necessary, however, small plantings shall be provided. 6 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three CONDITIONAL USE/BURGER KING PYLON SIGN C. Conditional Use Permit for a Pylon Sign and Drive -Through Restaurant --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on February 25 to consider a pylon sign and drive-through restaurant for the Burger King Corporation located at Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd' Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit for a drive-through restaurant, however, the pylon sign received a two to two vote which represents a failure of a motion to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages through //9 . For additional information regarding action that was taken y the APC, refer to those minutes found on page(s)/1,0 —/Z/ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for the Burger King Corporation allowing a drive-through facility and 2) to approve or deny the pylon sign as presented. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BURGER KING CORPORATION LOCATION: TOWN CENTRE 3RD ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: C.S.C. (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 18, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a • Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign and drive-through facility for Burger King. This facility will be on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition when those lots become• final platted in the near future. COMMENTS: Access to the Burger King Restaurant will be provided by a main entry/exit along Denmark Avenue. A one-way in from Town Centre .Drive and "exit only" should help alleviate congestion at the intersection. The proposed building is the top of the line model and will seat 93 people. City Code will require that 31 parking stalls be provided. 43 stalls 10' x 18' and a 12' x 18' handicapped stall are shown on the site plan. The drive-through will be on the west side of the building and stacking for approximately 8 cars is provided. The 4 stalls just north of the building .along the drive-through road will be designated "Employee Only". Also, the brick trash enclosure will be on the • north side of the building. The interior lighted pylon sign will be located on the northeasterly portion of the site and is shown 10' within the Yankee Doodle Road and Denmark Avenue. property lines. The total signage area will be 145 sq. ft. per side. This is above the . 125' code standard, however, signs of this type havebeen approved for the Hardee's Restaurants. The height can be 25', 30' or 35'. The drive -up menu board sign will be situated near the entry. of the one-way drive-through. An additional drive -way strip has been provided that will allow for exiting onto Town Centre Drive. A landscape plan was submitted and approved by staff. Parking areas will be bermed and planted with shrubbery as well as trees. If .approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following: - 1) The height of the pylon sign shall be 25'. 2) No building shall take place until the final platting process is completed. //?� MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1986 SUBJECT: ENGINEERING REVIEW OF THE BURGER KING SITE PLAN BURGER KING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION On behalf of the Engineering Department, I have reviewed the site plan dated January 23, 1986 for the Burger King site at the corner of Town Centre Drive and Denmark Avenue. The only problem I have with the site plan is the easterly one way access off of Town Centre Drive. As it is shown, this access is set back 64; feet from Denmark Avenue. This setback is measured from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue to the center line of the one-way access. This 64; foot setback is 5z feet less than what the Engineering Division feels is an absolute minimum setback. (Information note: The minimum setbacks the Engineering Division recommends for a two-way driveway is 100 feet.) This 70 foot setback includes a 30 foot street radius plus a 20 foot tangent section plus a 20 foot driveway radius. This distance also provides for adequate distance for vehicles crossing Denmark Avenue to slow down enough to make the turn into this site. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) The easterly one-way driveway access from Town Centre Drive be located 70 feet from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue. I will be at the February 25, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting to .answer any questions or concerns that the Commission may have regarding this issue. Rese�,ctf�ully S bmitted, • Richard M. H ti Assistant City Engineer RMH:jh 47 IMOplfonal Copy �TH b. �TH 1 P" -_. 1 cel -� � � ,•,.,�• L �•-�•�• e - \ \ •.� p 1 ons-•' :.` � I I :I I iPJ I 4. PJ lens - .- ol 9c5 -- s0 ' - ica f � �•Jlo ..I b 9A DT ._1.w IV ' I Jt• yw— �- :I`{I� I l K )171 � �s� \ 1 ✓' S69 \T W LYJ TOCENTRE DMVE E VU� V CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: PUREX CORPORATION LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK I, EAGANDALE CORPORATE SQUARE, NA, SECTION 11 EXISTING ZONING: L-1 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 14, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a ® conditional use permit for the storage of chlorine bleach chemicals at the Purex Corporation located south of Apollo Rd in section 11. COMMENTS: Purex Corporation currently occupies approx. 150,000 sq. ft. of the 200,000 sq. ft, building (see exhibit A & E). Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance is the owner of the building and the Sperry -Corporation rents the remaining 50,000 sq. ft. This site is just west of the railroad tracks that are used to bring in the chemicals needed for the production of bleach. This manufacturing and warehousing facility produces all of the bottles for the chlorine bleach. The chlorine, stored in the 180,000 pound rail car will be located near the NE portion of the building on the inner rail spur. This is a normal storage facility within the industry and it is done this way at the downtown St. Paul facility as well. • The tank will be padlocked for security even though this plant is operating on a 24 hour basis. Sodium hydroxide will. be stored in a 75,000.9allon diluted caustic tank at the south end of the building. This tank will measure approx. 20' x 50' and be 24' high. The building itself is 27' high and therefore the tank will not be visable from Apollo Rd. The sodium hydroxide will also be delivered by rail at 50% strength. It will then be diluted to a 17% strength before being stored in the subject tank. The resin cars bring in materials used to make the storage bottles. Neither the chlorine or sodium hydroxide is combustible. If approved, the conditional use shall be subject to all applicable ordinances and, 1) A 6' security fence around the sodium hydroxide tank located at the south end of the building. //7 APOLLO ROAD Xom \ BUILDING C SRP LOCA 1 MOOD GAL J DILUTED CAUSTIC TAM( • CLOAME CAR RESIN CARS — EXMT. 810E TRACK EXIST.SPUR LIRE CAUSTIC CAR _SURFACE MOUNTED CAUSTIC LII/ES h [ ! 1 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 7. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for the costs for the internal streets and utilities and also for the trailway along Wilderness Run Road. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits or approvals as referenced in the report. 10. A blanket variance shall be granted for a 20 foot front setback for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 11. All standard plat conditions :shall be adhered to. 12. The debris in the northeast portion of the plat shall be cleaned up. 13. All Lots shall maintain as near as possible, the required 50 foot • street frontage. All members voted affirmatively. - BURGER KING CORPORATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison in regard to the application of Burger King Corporation for conditional use permits for the pylon sign and drive-through restaurant located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition in part of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. Dale Runkle opened the presentation, advising that the applicant had worked with the City to provide at least 7 revisions to the plans. Mr. Randy Shaper, representing the applicant, .introduced the New Image 87 Plan with three times the normal landscaping, advising however that Landscaping would be reduced along the westerly portion of the property to avoid interference with the utility easement. It was noted that the entrance nearest the corner of the intersecting streets had been realigned at an angle to meet engineering requirements. It appeared that 18 foot long parking stalls were being provided based upon the capability for two foot overhang. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a arive-through facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. No building shall take place until the final platting process is completed. 2. Concrete curb and gutter shall be provided in the parking area. 3. The easterly one-way driveway access from Town Centre Drive shall be located 70 feet from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue. 4. Trees along the utility easement area may be eliminated as necessary, however, small plantings shall be provided. rl APC Minutes February 25, 1986 All members voted yes. Planning Commission members Harrison and Voracek expressed concerns regarding the fairness of the distribution of pylon signs in the proposed development under existing City Code. Staff was directed to address the issue. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign 25 feet in height with not more than 125 square feet of surface on each side. Bohne and Wilkins voted aye; Voracek and Harrison voted nay. DIAL CORPORATION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing for conditional use permit for outside storage of chlorine on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale • Corporate Square, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 11, east of Neil Armstrong Blvd. and south of Apollo Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the request. Also present were Tom Davis and a representative of Dial Corporation (formerly Purex Corporation). There was substantial discussion regaraing the danger of exposure to escaping chlorine or caustic chemicals in addition to the safety measures being implemented by the applicant. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the matter to the next meeting and direct the staff to resolve the issue of whether or not this use would be considered Heavy Industrial use and not appropriate for Light Industrial area. All voted aye. CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN The public hearing for a conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 30, at Cliff Road and Nicols Road, was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison. Dale Runkle introduced the application, reviewing ordinance requirements. Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present to represent Federal Land Company. It was noted that a reader board would not be included in the sign. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign. Ail members voted affirmatively. LAUKKA—BECK — WAIVER OF PLAT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing regarding a request for waiver of plat to split Outlot F in the Lone Oak Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 1, at Lone Oak Road and 'Trunk Highway #149. Dale Runkle described the request as necessary to convey a strip of land to the adjoining church as originally intended prior to development of the remaining land. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, with the strong recommendation that the church rezone the property to PF (Public Facilities) in the near future. All voted yes. 7 Agenda Informa"tion Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & PYLON SIGN/FEDERAL LAND COMPANY D. A Conditional Use Permit for a Twenty -Foot Pylon Sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition --The APC held a public hearing on February 25, 1986, to consider an appli- cation submitted by the Federal Land Company to allow a pylon sign for the Cedar Cliff Office Building along Nicols Road, north of the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. The APC is recommending approval of the pylon sign,subject to the staff report and further that the sign did meet all ordinance criteria. For a copy of the Planning Department report on this item, refer to pages /z 3 through / For a copy of the APC action • on this item, refer to page:(s)/Z ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit allowing a 201 pylon sign for Federal Land Company advertising Cedar Clift Commercial Park Addition. is /2v CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SIGN APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND CO LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK ADDITION, SE4, SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. ( PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ) . DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 12, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign for the Cedar Cliff Office Building along NicolS Rd, just north of the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. COMMENTS: This proposed 20' tall, interior lighted sign will be the same style as the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center sign. It will be located 10' within .the Nicols Rd & Cliff Dr property lines. Each side of this sign will contain 125 S.F. of signage area excluding the brick pillar posts. Code permits 250 S.F. total sign area. Previously, an application for this sign was denied for several reasons. The main being that there is another pylon sign at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. The City Attorney's office has interpreted the code to permit this sign since it is on a separate lot and will be more than 300' from the nearest pylon sign. The sign is necessary for the existing tenants in the • building and the Federal Land staff believes potential tenants are being lost due to the lack of visability. Sign bands on the building would be the otheroption to this pylon sign. If .approved, this pylon sign .shall be subject to the $2.50 per S.F. sign fee and all other applicable sign ordinances. 1 �.,t. CEDAR L'IFF 'q® FOR%THE FEDERAL L'A" :COMPANY' i I - li.•: •.1 1� J-- �. 6 �h' '" INDEX 70 DRAWINGS 1.91.E/L1N090aPE P{AM illl� 1 aIn6T ft00aPUM+ . I 3.?FEcaNa FLoogr •A, BNLDINO ELEVA OMS -;/h G: I�.,.—• is '�1 j. 6. weL\sec.lofl0. t s.ela S�ECTI5 D A. Fnn TYPES OOa o [ I } I 6-1 EOVXOaiIO 1 t A 6-2SECONDMOOR AN 6-3 POOP FRAMINGFUN � i JAOP06E0 POAO . ,. _IF MAR QFF slnnro cEFaEn s l TrPlcE Ai eEant ei nrn NG ooh . : 3 a 'SREIUNDSCAPE PLAN (Gredhq Ren by Gradng subeWractar) - . -'�SIGNiPiwluo om '• Gradc—> • )FROM ELEVATION „•� ,9 BERM •• 2cb iI'i b_u. 24' o idea •81 aITUMr _ 9ERM C'. 4' WE�FINfr- oJE5P, • I i N r ;� � 7_v. t1��cRiv ii I . SSB OETAIL-- ( 10' Set bo.;'.:.# prop 4,/ Ilnes) sen Klr. w yw, e.Lc.+maa. M eLra sF�ieq, 00•.w.,•L.+ Ke�lnLaTh •U. -[n LMw y t •r .50.01.cr orLw+. L.t.+� 6 a• ca. w., GY1 LA li. h. 1 `-• +" To�L.I S. e 125S.F. ~• � 1' �' -�–� ., 1, I,I ' � I •III L I: i Ji e rI.1 .L.J 1 3.01-- I I•I 310 s � I II r -r it T ; T�, _T r,n I " I � I IL.I 1 T 1 IFT ! I I )FROM ELEVATION „•� ,9 BERM •• 2cb iI'i b_u. 24' o idea •81 aITUMr _ 9ERM C'. 4' WE�FINfr- oJE5P, • I i N r ;� � 7_v. t1��cRiv ii I . SSB OETAIL-- ( 10' Set bo.;'.:.# prop 4,/ Ilnes) sen Klr. w yw, e.Lc.+maa. M eLra sF�ieq, 00•.w.,•L.+ Ke�lnLaTh •U. -[n LMw y t •r .50.01.cr orLw+. L.t.+� 6 a• ca. w., GY1 LA li. h. HAUGE, SMITH & EIDE, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW - CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 7808 SIBLEY MEMORI.LL HIGHWAY "GAN. MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN M EIDE RALPH W. COREY February 18, 1985 Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Cedar Cliff Bank Facility - Pylon Sign Dear Mr. Hedges: A.C. CODE 412 TLLKnwNE 454.4724 At the February 5, 1985 City Council meeting, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for a pylon sign to be erected on Cliff Road for the drive-in bank facility planned at that location by Federal Land Company. This approval was subject to an opinion from our office affirming that the Sign Ordinance does not prevent the erection of such a sign. The question is whether City Code, Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. relating to Area Identification Signs for Shopping Centers and Other Major Complexes prevents erection of the sign. Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. reads as follows: 11C. Major Complex. When an area identification is required, such as for a shopping center, major apartment complex, or major industrial building, up to one free-standing of pylon sign may be allowed for each major industrial street. The Council shall determine the maximum size after reviewing the applicable conditions including terrain, safety factors, etc." This Section must be read in conjunction with Section 4.20, Subd. 6.b. which allows up to one pylon sign per building. The proposed sign for the drive-in bank facility is not intended to be an area identification sign relating to a major complex, and for this reason, it would come under Subd. 6.b., rather than Subd. 6.c. Consequently, the proposed sign is allowable under the ordinance. It is true that there is already an area identification sign erected for Cedar .Cliff Shopping Center, near the corner of Nicols Road and Cliff Road. However, since the bank is a separate building, it would still be allowed its own sign under Subd. 6.b. Because Subd. 6.c. allows a certain number of signs per major adjacent street rather than per building, we interpret Subd. 6.c. 11 Thomas Hedges February 18„ 1985 Page 2 not as a substituteforSubd. 6.b. whenever a building is part of a major complex, but rather as authorization for more than one sign per building in a very limited number of circumstances. For these reasons, it is our opinion that the proposed pylon sign for the drive -up bank facility near. Cedar Cliff Shopping Center is not in violation of the Sign Ordinance. • Very truly yours, HAUGE, SMITH & EIDE, P.A. Bradley Sm Assistant City Attorney BS:ras APC Minutes February 25, 1986 All members voted yes. Planning Commission members Harrison and Voracek expressed concerns regarding the fairness of the distribution of pylon signs in the proposed development under existing City Code. Staff was directed to address the issue. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign 25 feet in height with not more than 125 square feet of surface on each side. Bohne and Wilkins voted aye; Voracek and Harrison voted nay. DIAL CORPORATION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing for conditional use permit for outside storage of chlorine on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale Corporate Square, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 11, east of Neil Armstrong Blvd, and south of Apollo Road. City Planner Runkle • introduced the request. Also present were Tom Davis and a representative of Dial Corporation (formerly Purex Corporation). There was substantial discussion regarding the danger of exposure to escaping chlorine or caustic chemicals in addition to the safety measures being implemented by the applicant. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the matter to the next meeting and direct the staff to resolve the issue of whether or not this use would be considered Heavy Industrial use and not appropriate for Light Industrial area. All voted aye. CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN The public hearing for a conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 30, at Cliff Road and Nicols Road, was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison. Dale Runkle introduced the application, reviewing ordinance requirements. Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present to 40 represent Federal Land Company. It was noted that a reader board would not be included in the sign. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign. All members voted affirmatively. LAUKKA—BECK — WAIVER OF PLAT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing regarding a request for waiver of plat to split Outlot F in the Lone Oak Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 1, at Lone Oak Road and Trunk Highway #149. Dale Runkle described the request as necessary to convey a strip of land to the adjoining church as originally intended prior to development of the remaining land. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, with the strong recommendation that the church rezone the property to PF (Public Facilities) in the near future. All voted yes. - 1' O 7 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCE/TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS E. A Conditional Use Permit and Variance for a Four Gas Pump Island with Canopy Added to Existing Convenience Store --A public hearing was held by the APC at there last meeting held on February 25, 1986 to consider a conditional use permit application for gasoline pumps and a variance for the canopy above the gasoline pumps at the Tom Thumb Food Market in the Bicentennial Addition adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. The APC is recommending that the conditional use permit and variance be denied. For additional information on this item refer to the Planner's • report, a copy is enclosed on pages AD through 135. For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s) 13,& ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) A conditional use permit to allow four gasoline pumps and an island at the Tom Thumb Food Market 2) To approve or deny a variance allowing a canopy on the gas pumps and island'. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE APPLICANT: TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS/FEDERAL LAND LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 14, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM • APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted request- ing a conditional use permit for gasoline pumps and a variance for the canopy above these tanks at the Tom Thumb Food •Market in the Bicentennial Addition along Yankee Doodle Rd & Washington Dr. L COMMENTS: The proposed 4 pump facility will have two-way access from Washington. Dr. Al Baker's Restaurant and the Amoco Station are to the east and the Amoco Car Care Center is to the south. A variance is requested since the 24' x 40' free-standing canopy is approx. 7' from the eastern property line. There are no overhead utilities to be concerned with. The underground storage tanks will be made of fiberglass and located directly south of the pump area. Ample room has been allowed.. for the refueling of these tanks by .semi trucks along the back of the Tom Thumb. Stacking for 1 car on each side of the pumps is being provided. No additional signage is being requested. The only building modification will be a window to the pump area for gasoline pur- chases only. There are no specific conditions stated in the. P.D. agreement in regard 'to gas pumps at the Yankee Square Shopping Center. The applicant has submitted a statement detailing their reasons for this conditional 'use permit/variance request and it has been attached for your review. Representives will be present at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting with rendered site plans and sketches to help illustrate their proposal. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1986 :SUBJECT: ENGINEERING REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE FOR TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS AT YANKEE SQUARE - The layout for the Yankee Square site as presented is totally unacceptable. This site proposes a curb opening in excess of 90 feet. This will create mass confusion between vehicles attempt- ing to obtain access to the pump station and vehicles attempting to obtain access to the Yankee Square parking lot. In addition, it appears this site would require a variance from the 20 foot green space requirement with a triangular shaped boulevard area. It is difficult to tell how much variance would be required because Washington Drive is not drawn to scale. The site plan shows Washington Drive as a 52 foot roadway. Washington Drive is actually • a 44 foot roadway. Finally, 18 feet does not provide a great deal of room for vehicles attempting to drive through-. this site if there are vehicles stopped at the gas pumps. The applicant could change the site layout to provide for a 30 foot wide driveway entrance situated at right angles to the curb on Washington Drive. While this would satisfy my requirements for access, it still will not eliminate the need for a green space variance or will it provide for two car stacking distance at the north driveway. Also, it will not improve the limited bypass space the 18 foot lane allows. I cannot recommend approval of the proposed gas pump site at the Yankee Square location for the following reasons: 1) Driveway width is far too wide. • 2) Green space variance is required. 3) The north access cannot provide for two car stacking distance. 4) The 18 foot width does not provide for a desirable bypass lane. '. I will be at the February 25, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting to answer any questions or concerns you may have regarding these items. ; Respectfully Submitted, Richard M. Assistant City Engineer • Ll whp 'b .0. SH C PMI y� p si I n Q IICN/ C/L IMIM 21 WGPRs �V •�` ' ° �I �� ' •' GSL EIRI PPPR P, f � � I VI c�.l ULI ©xc, I S { -�r. Il o-lr " X q Y i cl <P -- rlPe oeiE wow a COMM. r )om�w ICRMAWR'\f 'MNR _.r GpR0i,�19PPM1 Viil .[smngr(jc �Y 8 VGRe I Y4MICIPIL �e /11J crxrER � � r`� s.x+.ti sn - - u[r[w.o r.wn eoow[ �ofe nm co 1 wa fYOCe Gm GP[=[w!e . mGos®PMP OSSVD mWPM Q� I1 lUJIM1 �WI�J�IoJ . Boon) MAG KE7990HQ AWCO 9TAM el+ h roe C � _ �fw LL[•.nl 110P11111MI. ■ 9 PARK e M i PLANTING SCHEDULE Rncr >�Y•e.�.1• • nava wrs tl •� •[ Iwal 8 � 8� •.•w WM _ 1 Mbu u•P 1 OJI' YNR .FII[C F•.r•W •r�1�Y 6 1 �%I ' � •ISM m o"....�.e.•, �P Fuchs -VIEW FROM NORTHEAST , rp Euchs APC Minutes February 25, 1986 TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE Vice Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing regarding the request for a conditional use permit for gasoline pumps and a variance for the canopy above said pumps at the Tom Thumb Food Market in the Bicentennial Addition along Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. Dale Runkle introduced the request indicating that variances would be necessary from the requirements for service bays and the setbacks. Mr. George May was present to represent Tom Thumb Food Markets as well as Mr. Charles Bartholdi for the Lana owner, Federal Land Company. Discussion centered around the following: 1. Present traffic problems at that location which may be complicated by the addition of gasoline pumps. 2. Green space and set back requirements. 3. Ability to stack cars without parking in Washington Drive or,blocking the entrance to the shopping center. In addition comments were made by attorney, Ted Meyer, representing the neighboring Amoco and Certicare facilities, including: 4. Adequate parking. 5. Loading and unloading trucks. 6. The high concentration of gas pumps in that.immediate area. 7. The reliance of his clients upon the ordinance requirements for full service—service stations. 8. That the planned development did not indicate motor fuel sales. Bohne moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application based upon existing City Code and policy requiring service bays with the sale of motor fuel, in addition to' the objections of the City Engineer, as follows: 1. Driveway width is far too wide. 2. Green space variance is required. 3. The north access cannot provide for two car stacking distance. 4. The 18 foot width does not provide for a desirable by—pass lane. All voted yes. 134 9 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six AMENDMENT/LAND USE REGULATIONS/SECTION 11.20 F. Consideration of Amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use Regulations, Section 11.20 in Your Review and Termination --The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing at the January 28, and again at the February 25 meetings to consider an amendment, to the subdivision regulations within the .City Code that requires public hearings for all extensions of a planned development. In other words, if a planned unit development contract is approved between the City Council and a developer for a five year period of time and that developer at the end of five ® (5) years asks for an extension for his/her P.U.D. agreement, a public hearing would be required under the new ordinance amendment . The APC is recommending approval of the subdivision • ameVnment, and for a copy.of the new ordinance refer to page For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) ACTION TO B CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation, Section 11..20, which allows for public hearing for any P.U.D. extension of time. X37 TI 4 Second Revision ORDINANCE NO. _, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 11, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY ADDING PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC BEARINGS RENEWAL, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.20, Subd. B.E. "Annual Review and Termination" is hereby amended as follows: E. Annual Review, Extension and Termination. 1. The Planning Commission 'Phe--eounei*;--or--by-direetion; and the Pfanning-eommission Council, shall review annually after approval of the "preliminary plan", the progress of each planned development to determine whether or not the applicant has substantially complied with the Planned Development Agreement. a. Each body shall make note thereof in its the minutes at -a • regular -meetings b. If the applicant/owner/developer of an unexpired planned development agreement has failed to comply with the agreement, the Council may, in its sole discretion, after recommendation by the Advisory Planning Commission, at a duly advertised and noticed public hearing as required by Code Section 11.40, Subd. 5, remove the superimposed planned development zoning by resolution, and the land area within the planned development shall automatically revert to its prior basic zoning classification. 2. Upon the expiration of the term of a planned development agreement for a development which has not been substantially completed a duly advertised and noticed public hearing, as required by Section 11.40 Subd. 5., shall be held by the Planning Commission which shall make a recommendation to the City Council • whether the planned development agreement shall be terminated, and if terminated whether the planned development zoning shall be removed. The applicant shall provide an accurate list of property owners within 350 feet of the development. a. The City Council may extend the planned development agreement noting its reasons in its minutes. b. If the City Council determines that the planned development agreement shall be terminated it shall also determine whether the planned development zoning shall be removed. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Clerk Its Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: APC Minutes February 25, 1986 MURPHY STREET The Advisory Planning Commission members noted the request to rename the frontage road, west of I -35E and north of Deerwood Drive, to Murphy Street. It was suggested that Murphy Drive sounded better. Bohne moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend changing the name to Murphy Drive. All voted in favor. RENEWAL, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the proposed revision to Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.20, Subd. 8.E. as prepared by the City Attorney. All voted aye. ADJOURNMENT Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 11:35 p.m. All voted yes. Secretary /399 DGK Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven TEMPORARY ADVERTISING,SIGN/DALLAS DEVELOPMENT IST ADDITION G. Temporary Advertising Sign for Dallas Development, 1st Addition --An Application was submitted to the Planning Department for a special permit to allow a temporary advertising/leasing sign along Highway 13 south of Silver Bell Road. For a copy of the Planning Department Report refer to page's _aL through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or.denythe special permit for a temporary advertising/leasing sign as requested by Dallas Development Company. /�o SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL PERMIT DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY SE a, SECTION 18 LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) MARCH 19, 1986 MARCH 12, 1986 JIM STURM • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a special permit to allow a temporary advertising/leasing sign along Highway 13 south of Silver Bell Road. COMMENTS: This plat has been renamed Dallas Development 1st Addition, however, the project will be marketed as "Silver Bell Plaza". This proposed 4' x 8' non -lighted sign will be located near the eastern property line. The double-faced sign will be made of plywood and have a 10' maximum height. City Code will require that this sign be placed 10' within the property line and subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. ppi.n 6v PXN'DO �y�. 4.4 w=o � SILVER 13ELL PLAZA NOW LEASING 941-2971 OFFICE/SNOWROOM/SERVICE -9 60rm5 FI;OM 1400 TO IO10005f. ° bALL46DEUELOFART CO. TEMFORARY REAL E5TATE /21TA- My 13 e hILNER a L i Ba ;, ,�.\ • 'rte • N DATA ' RM 11�� M+�K /• �rrw.�a �� ■k / to M1� STATE TRUNK HGHWAY N0. 13 O .' i SITE PLAN -StSN lDC A m O IJ 41 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight REQUEST TO AMEND OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE POLICY H. Consideration of Request To Amend Off Sale Liquor License Policy --A letter was submitted by the Federal Land. Company requesting that the off sale liquor license policy be amended to allow for one (1) additional license to be used in the Town. Center - Eagan Shopping Center. At the July 16, 1985 City Council meeting, the off sale liquor license policy was amended by defining new geographic boundaries; however, it was determined that the number of off sale liquor licenses would remain at four (4). Federal Land Company has been made aware by this office of the history regarding the geographic location and number of off sale liquor licenses, however, at their request, this item was placed on the agenda for City Council consideration. A copy of a letter requesting an additional off s���/ W. liquor license for the Shopping Center is enclosed on page /T� . If it is the desire of the City Council to consider an amendment to the off sale liquor license policy that would generate one (1) additional off sale liquor license, additional background information will be provided by city staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny any further consideration for changing the off sale liquor license policy by amending the number of off sale liquor licenses that can.be granted within the community. /�3 ro � I Federal :0 Land Company Yankee Square Office III • 3460 Washington Drive • Suite 202 • Eagan, Minnesota 55144 • Tel. 612452-3303 March 5, 1986 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan P.O. Box 21-199 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 HE: Off Sale Liquor License • Dear Mr. Hedges: The purpose of this letter is to petition the Eagan City Council for 1a consideration and change of the off sale liquor license policy currently in effect in the City of Eagan. Proceedurally, it is my understanding that Federal Land Company must officially request to be placed on the agenda for the next Eagan City Council meeting. Therefore, Federal Land Company officially requests that it be placed on the March 19, 1986 Eagan City Council Agenda to consider our petition for a change in the current number of off sale liquor licenses in the City of Eagan and to request that an off sale liquor, . license be issued for use in the Town Centre—Eagan Shopping Center. Sincerely,I Mark E. Battis Legal Department, Attorney ,• I MEB/ap i I i i I I i I l I Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine M.G. ASTLEFORD-CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT I. M.G. Astleford for Request to Review Expenses Relating to the CTC Business Campus Development Agreement --The City of Eagan entered into a development agreement with Astleford-Anderson dated April 16, 1985. one purpose of a development agreement is to protect the City from incurring any costs related to a project initiated by the developer. As a part of this development agreement there is specific language that reads as follows: "The developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable engineering, administrative and legal expenses incurred or to be incurred by City in connection with this agreement, plat approval • and acceptance, authorization of improvements including bidding, easement acquisition, reports and hearings, construction inspection, surveys and compliance, tests including environmental assessments and or environmental impact statements, if required". The City has incurred $12,715.61 of expenses to Project 434 which is Technology Drive/CTC Business Campus which should be reimbursable as a condition of the development agreement. The M.G. Astleford Company has been placed on notice several times through written correspondence and verbal discussion that this amount is due and payable to the City of Eagan. Legal counsel for M.G. Astleford Inc. has submitted a letter to the City asking that a bond for the $12,000 be allowed upon M.G. Astleford commencing legal action within 30 days of putting up the bond to obtain a legal determination of their responsibility for the expenses and further would like an opportunity to review • the matter with City Council. In summary, the City accepted engineering, legal and surveying responsibilities upon request by Astleford-Anderson and performed the work with the understanding and language within the development agreement that these costs would be fully reimbursed to the City. For additional information on this item, refer o pertinent pages of the development agreement found on pages — through , a copy of correspondence from the City Administrator to Mr. Ray Williams representing the M.G. Astleford Company on pages through /tj'Y . Finally, a copy of a letter from legal coun el representing M.G. Astleford requesting that the City allow for a bond in the amount of $12,000, condition upon M.G. Astleford commencing legal action within 30 days of putting up the bond to obtain a legal determination of their responsibility for the expenses. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the request presented to the City by legal counsel for M.G. Astleford asking for a deviation of policy for financial obligations as enforced by development agreements. 1�5 CITY OF EAGAN CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the 16th day of April, 1985, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a municipality of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter called the CITY), and the Owner and the Developer identified herein. A. The term "Developer" as used herein refers to: ASTLEFORD-ANDERSON, a joint venture consisting of RICHARD W. ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota • general partnership, and M. G. ASTLEFORD COMPANY, a general partnership, whose address is P. 0. Box 5302, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. B. The term "Owner" as used herein refers to: M. G. ASTLEFORD COMPANY, INC. whose address is 1200 West Highway #13, Burnsville, MN 55337. WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City for approval of the plat or subdivision known as CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS located within the City; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of said approval, the City requires the installation and/or availability of streets, water, sanitary ® sewer, related services, storm sewer pipes, ponds, or other facilities; and, . WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes Chapters 412 and 462, the City Council has agreed to approve said plat on the conditions: (1) that the Developer enter into this Development Contract, which contract defines the work which the Developer undertakes to complete within the boundaries of said plat as described hereafter, and (2) the Developer shall provide a bond, letter of credit, or collateral agreement in the amount and with conditions satisfactory to the City, providing for the securing to the City the actual construction and installation of such improvements within the period specified by the City. NOW THEREFORE, the City, Owner and Developer agree as follows: 1 understood by the parties, however, that the responsibility of the Developer is limited by strikes and force majeure. 9. City Liability. The Developer specifically releases and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City of Eagan, all members of the Eagan City Council, and all employees and agents of the City of Eagan from any and all claims, liabilities, causes of action, or litigation which may arise from third parties, including but not limited to contractors, sub-contractors, and any persons who may now or in the future have any interest in the property involved herein, relating to performance or the failure to perform the above described work or the performance or failure to perform any act concerning special assessments or connection charges relating to the property involved herein, except through intentional fraudulent misrepresentation, and further releases and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the members of the Eagan City Council, all employees and agents of the City, from any personal Liability in connection with handling funds pursuant to the terms of this agreement, except through intentional fraudulent misrepresentation. W. City Miscellaneous Expenses. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable engineering, administrative and legal expenses • incurred or to be incurred by City in connection with this agreement, plat approval and acceptance, authorization of improvements including bidding, easement acquisition, reports and hearings, construction inspection, surveys and compliance tests including Environmental Assessments and/or Environmental Impact Statements, if required. 11. Escrow Requirement. The final plat shall not be approved and no work shall be commenced under this contract until the Developer has deposited with the City a satisfactory bond, letter of credit, or collateral agreement for 60% of the estimated cost of the improvements specified in paragraph 3 and 13 • • Recorder and the owner shall provide and execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording of this agreement. 23. Binding Agreement. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms and conditions of this recordable agreement shall run with the land herein described and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, administrators and assigns of the owners and developers referenced in this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF EAGAN (Datee�:�y-�')�a�8S//� ) By:X11/L�A/.1 I Its MayoV Q Attest: �J Its luerk Dev ent Contract prove as to Form: Eagan City Attorney (Date:-/G-cS"�C) Department of Vubvig Works (Date: THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Hauge, Smith 6 Eide, P. A. Attorneys for the City of Eagan 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, MN 55122 (612) 454-4224 18 OWNER: M.G.ASTLEFORD COMPANY,INC. D e Its: By: Date It DEVELOPER:,ASTLEFORD-ANDERSON, a joint venture By:_ Its: And: Its: 6oL"� lam! 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD,. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mo PHONE; (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH January 31, 1986 MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Coumd Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator . EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Geek MR RAY WILLIAMS M G ASTLEFORD COMPANY 1200 WEST HWY 13 BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Re: Project 434, Technology Drive/CTC Business Campus - • Financial Obligations Dear Ray: As a result of our meeting the other day, I've had an opportunity to research in further detail the costs incurred by the City in conjunction with processing the proposed CTC Business Campus development and the related public street and utility improvements. After discussing the background of this development with our Director of. Finance and Director of Public Works, it has been determined that the following costs have been incurred by the City of Eagan: Engineering $10,033.08 Legal 1,743.55 Surveying 938.98 Total $12,715.61 During our most recent meeting and other previous discussions, you have requested consideration for deferring the collection of those costs incurred until the property develops at some future date under the premise that the work performed could be applied to the required future public improvements. However, you did indicate a willingness to pay that portion of the outstanding balance due pertaining to the legal costs incurred by the City. After reviewing the work performed by the Engineering and Surveying firms with our Director of Public Works, it has been determined that little, if any, of this work could be applied towards any potential future public improvements. This is due to the fact that the majority of the work was based on elevationsandan alignment that required a cooperative agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation that could have only been performed during the final construction phases of I -35E which has now been completed. Future development ooff/f this property will not have THE LONE OAK TREE_ ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MR RAY WILLIAMS PROJECT 434 JANUARY 31, 1986 PAGE 2 the opportunity to take into consideration this past cooperative venture with MnDot. Subsequently, any future public improvements will require complete new surveying and engineering studies to be evaluated based on:;,.whatever development is proposed for that site. The City has incurred similar situations with other developers in the past whereby extensive detailed engineering, planning, legal and surveying costs have been incurred only to have the project rescinded by the developer's request at a later date. In all past similar situations, the City has required payment in full of all costs incurred which has been fully complied with by the affected developers in conformance with past contractual agreements. is While the City can appreciate the problems that were experienced in trying to make this a successful project, the City cannot afford to finance speculative ventures for development that occurs within the City. This is the reason for requiring the guarantee of the owner/developer for all costs that may be incurred before' the City will agree to initiate a public improvement process. As you are aware, M.G. Astleford, Inc. cosigned the Development Contract Agreement with the City of Eagan as a representative of the owner and as a partner of the developer wherein all these costs that would be incurred by the City were guaranteed to be paid. It is unfortunate that you were not able to complete your develop- ment as you had anticipated. However, we hope that you will recognize the City's position regarding our concern for costs incurred in good faith on behalf of the developer's request and ® that you will honor your previous commitments and reimburse the City for the expenses that were incurred in trying to process and facilitate your development request. By doing so, you will maintain your firms credibility with the City and will greatly enhance our willingness and ability to assist you in any future development proposals that you may pursue in the City of Eagan. Your anticipated cooperation in remitting payment for the outstand- ing balance due for the attached invoices will be greatly appreciat- ed. If I can provide any assistance or additional information in helping to clarify the City's position regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. S iptN<erely, k C cM�7J Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TAC/jbd enclosures cc; Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works r INCE & LISZT, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Suite 312 8900 Penn Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 (612) 881-8805 RICHARD T: INCE Mayor Blomquist City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 March 4, 1986 Re: M. G. Astleford, Inc. Dear Mayor: MARVIN A LISZT My client M. G. Astleford, Inc. entered into a development contract with the City of Eagan on April 16, 1985, for the CTS Business Campus Development that had been started by Richard W. Anderson Associates. By the development agreement, M. G. Astleford, Inc. agreed in paragraph 10 as follows: 10. City Miscellaneous Expenses. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable engineering, administrative and legal expensed incurred or to be incurred by City in connection with this agreement, plat approval and acceptance, authorization of improve- ments including bidding, easement acquisition, reports and hearings, construction inspection, surveys and compliance tests including Environmental Assessments and/or Environmental Impact Statements, if required. • The agreement is clear we agree to reimburse expenses of the City as incurred as a result of this agreement. The project did not get completed and the City has sent Astleford approximately $12,000.00 in invoices they have for the project from its beginning, which upon examination of the invoices includes billing for time periods before our development agreement. We dispute the obligation to the extent it seeks recovery of expenses that were incurred by Anderson. The problem is that Mr. Colbert, as Director of Public Works, has ad- vanced the City's position as follows: I I l Mayor -City of Eagan March 4, 1986 -Page Two - It is the City's position that no further development proposals will be processed -by the City where M. G. Astleford has any involvement as the landowner, developer or applicant until past accounts have been brought up to date. I strongly encourage you to facilitate whatever action is necessary to bring your account up to date so that there will be no further delays on any future development proposals within the City of Eagan. In addition to the hold on the excavation permit referenced above, the City is not processing your ® petition to prepare a feasibility report for the installation of public improvements with the Ridge - cliff development until this matter has been satis- factorily resolved. The alternative would be a City requirement for you to post a cash escrow based on the estimated costs_of any future requests. thus, effectively precluding any further activity of Astleford until this problem is resolved. My client stands to sustain large losses if this position is maintained by the City, a position we believe is unfair. We want to maintain a good relationship with the City, and continue doing business in Eagan. To that end, we have asked that we be allowed to put up a bond for the $12,000.00 conditioned upon us commencing legal action with 30 days of putting up the bond to obtain a legal determination of our responsibility for the expenses. Upon placement of the bond we would expect the projects presently • underway to be allowed to proceed. It would seem that such a resolution would be fair to both sides and adequately protect the interests of the City pending final resolution. Sincerely, INCE & LISZT, P.A. Ri and T. Ince RTI:lg /5v Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty STAR CITY RECERTIFICATION J. Star City Recertification --The Economic Development Commission has completed its review and preparation for Star City Recertifica- tion. At the last regular meeting of the Economic Development Commission a set of goals and objectives were set forth for what is now categorized as the Two -Year Action Plan and the ongoing Five -Year Action Plan. Action is required by the City Council on both of the Action plans as recommended by the Economic Develop- ment Commission. For a list of the Two and Five -Year Action Plans refer to pages /611 through 151. A copy of the annual report which includes background information on activities performed by the Economic Development Commission and a more detailed analysis of each of the Two -Year and Five -Year Action Plan activities will be included with the Additional Information packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the list of objectives for Star City Recertification as presented. /6�3 EAGAN TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN WORK PLAN WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION DATE STATUS 1. Update Five Year City Administrator July 1, 1986 To be completed Capital Improvement City Staff, Public Plan Works Department 2. Update Labor Survey EDC, Labor Survey June 1, 1987 To be completed Committee 3• Solid Waste Study City Planner Aug. 1, 1986 To be completed City Staff, EDC 4. Economic Development/ EDC, Oct. 1, 1986 To be completed Port Authority ' City Administrator Feasibility Study City Staff 5. Review Zoning City Planner, June 1, 1986 To be completed Code Classifications City Staff, APC 6. Update Comprehensive City Planner, APC. Sept. 1, 1986 In progress Guide City Staff, City Council 7. Completion of I-494 City Council Aug. 1, 1986 In progress Mn DOT ' ® 8. Upgrade County/ Public Works Sept. 1, 1986 In progress City Collector Roads Dept., Dakota County 9• 24 Hour Emergency EDC, City Jan. 1, 1987 In progress Care Center Council, Chamber _ of Commerce .10. Construct Eagan City Council, City Aug. 1, 1987 In progress High School Staff, School District 11. Update Star City June 1, 1986 In progress Book, Slide Set, City Staff, EDC Promotional Chamber of Materials Commerce 12. Develop Categorized City Staff, Jan. 1, 1987 In progress Presentation File EDC EACAN TW3-YEAR AMCN PIAN PAGE 2 WORK TASKS ASSI(NMERP COMPLEMN DA'I'S S US 13. Review Industrial City Staff, EDC June 1, 1986 To be campleted Call Process/Budget Chamber of Commerce 14. Review Small EDC, Chamber of Sept. 1, 1986 In progress Business Financing Caimerce Programs 1'!�5 FAGAN FIVE-YEAR ACTION PLAN WORK PLAN WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION DATE STATUS ,. 1. Promote Large Chamber of 1986-1988 In progress Retail Facilities Commerce, EDC 2. Construct Eagan City Council 1989 To be completed Community Center City Staff • 3. Promote Seneca City Council 1989 To be completed Treatment Plant Public Works Expansion Director, EDC 4. Develop 5 -Year Director of 1986-1988 In progress Major Street Plan Public Works 5. Develop Schedule of Director of 1986-1988 In progress Trunk Utility Public Works Completion 6. Develop Commercial- — City Staff 1986-_1989 In progress Industrial Databases 7. Identify and Study City Planner 1988 To be completed Redevelopment Needs City Administrator, ® City Staff 8. Assess Airport Noise City Staff 1986-1990 In progress Impacts and City Administrator Alternatives 9. Assess Mass Transit City Planner, 1987-1988 To be completed Needs Public Works Dept. City Staff 10. Monitor Electrical Chamber of 1986-1990 In progress Rates Commerce 11. Concept Plan for EDC, City Staff 1987-1988 To be completed Senior Life Style Chamber of Housing Commerce 156 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986,.City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One CONSIDERATION OF REINSTATEMENT OF UNCHANGED PREL L:' A. Preliminary Plat Reinstatement/Blackhawk Acres, West of Blackhawk Road & Adjacent to Robin Lane, SE 1/4 of Sec. 17 --The Rezoning from R4 to R3 of a 5.5 acre parcel and the replat of Blackhawk Acres was approved at the July 5, 1983 City Council meet- ing. This preliminary plat was not processed for final plat approval and according to the ordinance after one (1) year the preliminary plat is no longer a valid plat. Please r fer to a copy of the July 5, 1983, minutes found on pages through The • owners, Herb and Terry Bergstrom, have requested in a letter dated February 23, and enclosed on page L(,0 , that the preliminary plat be reinstated. According to the City Planner there are no, changes to the preliminary platy a reinstatement can be acted on by the City Council. Any changes to the preliminary plat would require action at a public hearing by the Advisory Planning Commission. To date, the owners have indicated there are no changes to the Blackhawk Acres plat as approved in 1983. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rein- statement of the Blackhawk Acres Preliminary Plat as granted at the July 5, 1983, meeting. SPECIAL NOTE: Any City Council members who would like a copy of the original report and support data for the Blackhawk Acres Plat, please contact this office, and copies will be made available as a part of the Administrative Packet. • 1�7 ,,. moi' c,t Jt� Council Minutes July 5, 1983 9. Subject to engineering recommendations for this phase. 10. Landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved at the time each building permit application is submitted. 11. A trail shall be installed at the developer's expense along. Dodd Road and Wilderness Run Road according to City standards. Those in favor were Thomas, Smith-' and Egan; those against were Blomquist and Wachter. SEE PLAT FILE BLACRHAWK ACRES - REZONL'iG AND PRELLMINARY PLAT 40 The application of Mr. Herbert Bergstrom for rezoning from R-4 to R-3 of 5.5 acres and replat of Blackhawk Acres was next brought before the Council. Mr. Bergstrom was present as was Brad Swenson, Engineer. The Planning Commis- sion, at its meeting do June 28, 1983 recommended approval subject to certain stipulations. Mr. Swenson explained there was a problem with development because of several easements including the easement granted to the City for the storm sewer outlet from Blackhawk Lake. The plan is to down -zone the property from R-4 to -H-3. Neighbors to the east who appeared at the Planning =! Commission meeting expressed concerns about elevation, preservation of large -> oak trees and other issues. He also stated that the easement for roadway has eliminated the development on a portion of the property and that the developer has now shifted the design and moved the buildings further from the single family dwellings to the east. The request was to rezone the entire site. Mr. Bergstrom stated that the developer cannot guarantee a minimum $90,000.00 value for each unit because no specific builder has been acquired at the present time. Thomas moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the applica- tion .for rezoning from R-4 to R-3. All voted in favor. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the application for .preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. A development agreement shall be entered into between the City and the applicant prior to final plat approval. 2. The townhouse association including the articles, bylaws, and re- strictions shall be reviewed by City staff prior to final plat. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adquate landscape bond shall be required and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed, including the landscaping along the east boundary border- ing the single family homes and also the oak tree on the site shall be pre- served; further, that the neighbors will review the landscape plan when it has been completed. 4. The parking areas shall be blacktop surface and concrete curbing shall be provided around the perimeters of the parking area. / �12 Council Minutes W, 191 July 5, 1983 5. Robin Lane shall be upgraded with this development proposal. 6. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. 7. A detailed erosion control/grading plan shall be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 8. A variance shall be granted for the south private drive to exceed the 84A maximum grade if the grade cannot be flattened when the final grade for Robin Lane has been established. 9. If installed privately, utilities and street plans and specifica- tions shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted for approval by staff. 10. The proposed private drives shall be 24 feet wide with concrete curbing and bituminous surfacing. 11. The parking stalls shall be constructed according to City Code. 12. Access to Lots 1 and 2, Blocks 4 and 5, shall be removed from Robin Lane and directed to the internal private drive, but such access shall be reviewed by the staff. 13. The permanent and temporary easement right-of-way for the realign- ment portion of Robin Lane which previously has not been dedicated shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat and shall be 60 feet wide. 14. Site distance drawings shall be included with the development agree- ment to reflect the site distances. All voted yes. 169 R 83-43 SEE PLAT FILE February 23, 1986 Mr. Dale C. Runkle City Planner Clty of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Subject: Preliminary Plat Re -instatement Blackhawk Acres, Lots 7-12 Dear Mr. Runkle, Per ycnir conversation with Dave Keller today, I believe that you are aware that we have finally had some interest in the above property from a potential buyer/developer. As you may ® already know, the enormous assessments levied against this property (because of trunk sewer and street completion) have devalued it and created as adverse interest to potential buyers. This has caused undue delay and hardship in selling the property. kHowever, we have recently come to a tentative agreement based on preliminary plat approval and now the plat originally approved has expired. We request re -instatement of the preliminary plat exactly as is so that we may provide that which is necessary to sell the property. Your cooperation in expediting the procedure to approval would be greatly appreciated. The interested buyer would like to have a building up as a model by late spring. Therefore, a final plat approval would be sought soon after closing. Pending your agreement with re -instatement of the preliminary plat, if it is necessary to send it back through City Council, March 4th would be very beneficial over a later ® date. We would be grateful for this consideration. Best regards, Herb arZry Bergstrom Owners, Blackhawk Acres, Lots 7-12 X60 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two CONTRACT 86-5, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT B. Contract 86-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions') --At 10':30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities for Contract 86-5 (Windtree 5th & 6th Additions). Enclosed on page /(oy is a tabulation of all bids received showing the comparison of the low bid to the engineer's estimate and the feasibility report estimate presented at the public hearing held on January 21, 1986. All final bids will be checked for accuracy in their extensions and additions and a formal recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the meeting on March 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-5 (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. • J Our File No. 49373 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-5 WINDTREE 5TH b 6TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 462 EAGAN. MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS 1• Richard Knutson 2. M. Danner 3. F. F. Jedlicki 4. 0 & P Construction 5. Northdale Constr. 6. Annandale S & W 7. J.P. Norex 8• M & M Sewer & Water 9• Encon Utilities 10. Gartzke Constr. 11. Lake Area Utility 12• L & G Rehbein 13. S.M. Hentges UNDER ENGR EST---- % UNDER FEAS. REPORT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE - 3919d FEASIBILITY REPORT -- /G v BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, March 14, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $237,271.30 237,969.50 240.942.00 252.320.65 253.611.75 254 069.69 257.301.11 264.351.25 267.279.50 270.514.50 274.102.60 705a'is nn 300.621.75 ------12.1/ ------16.8% .$270,000.00 —285,100.00 • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three CONTRACT 86-7, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT C. Contract 86-7, Receive/Award Contract (O''Neil's Ponds Storm Sewer) --At 10:.30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, formal bids were received for the installation of a trunk storm sewer outlet for the pon located on the Robert J. O'Neil property. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received showing a comparison of the low bid to the engineer's estimat and the feasibility report estimate presented at the public hearing held on December 3, 1985. All bids will be checked for accuracy •in their extensions and additions and a formal recommendation will be provided at the March 19 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-7 (O'Neil's Ponds Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. /� 5 Our File No. 49356 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-7 O'NEIL'S PONDS (DP - 4, DP - 5, & DP - 10 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTORS 1. Northdale Construction • 2. Richard Knutson 3. Arcon Construction 4. Crossings, Inc. 5. 0 & P Contracting 6. Barbarossa & Sons 7. Lake Area Construction 8. S.M. Hentges 9, Encon 10.0/M Barry Constr. PROJECT No. 443 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C..S.T. BID DATE: Friday. March 14. 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $216.016.25 236.458.00 239,553.90 257.762.00 263,512.33 _ 267.272.50 - 274,299.40 281.740.87 283908.00 _ 296,584.00 UNDER FEAS. REPORT --------------------------------------- 27.7% UNDER ENCR EST ------------------------------------------- 25.5% _...__...._._._..___...._. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ------------- --------------------$290,000.00 FEASIBILITY REPORT ------------------------------------ 298,800.00 /a �z 3912d • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four APPROVE FINAL PLAT/BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION D. Approve Final Plat, Biittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Brittany 9th Addition as submitted by Tollef,son Builders Incorporated. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 17, 1984. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for consideration by Council action. Enclosed on page is a copy of the proposed final plat which conforms with the pproved preliminary plat. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS final plat for Brittany 9th Mayor and City Clerk to execute ITEM: To approve/deny/continue Addition and if approved, authorize all related documents. /� J BRITTANY 9"T" ADDITION . I r®, n l.m xorY, IW ar Y rr _. �• W Ybr u r . r.r �. r_...I�w. .. Yo r..r r.•..� N W nu_y.�YW YYrr, .r.rw b - ... __ yewTlY SiNyiW�.MYL facWO`... Yrr..: YrnrF _ _ Y YInYI T •Yrll. W N Wr VN YI MNW F.Y rMY a � IrY i Ill�r 1• r: r_u��•rr�l W Yli W u. Yruu •x wax u in r rW rlu 1. Mrbr i . lur Yrrr• WI. r �. LrrIwYN.,.r. iwr�Ir�W141u1Yw:611WWomYxrx.urlruYN.ru_� 1opiN ura,NnaTN{SBRINq'Mdl'lrraa{.iia.n,a.iir�l 1.1 '•Yn4` I jw;i �i3r 1 ill 6 rl�t11 y II N! II ., Yi9 ki I ... r.. Y, .r .u�. r .._ I iitiVt 3 I� t�ti�Y� �, tit{ ��il� Fil; rYl� fi en lr- J� Y II fYN_ YAf- !�1 '1 A a rr rwrY r 1\�Y r i�•r •nom �r�•i.T.�.-�Tli' Y•(.i-'h � s,Y tR s ! u �• 1 .3R2�1°iii l � ' , fli r^. � 14 i !I I ptirl�� slYx.w 1. louw wwr �� .I. ,ii�, r � �� II la rt�,i;�,i�T�r.h�NaIC•Nm�..:�:: ��.:' ' I Y YI � j: t l! w-' • s8 ih�V' Abp r j! �B , � it ,l � . n •�I.•.r� ln-c..— x. i.3"._=Van rrl�.nr. rNrwalmn .N .. I4tll anl'~�E�/V �1 `EE 5\•'� h� •I IJ rr_Ir_rr_rrrm^w`��':•rr.w.r 1.+... n.u. an_ru. r. rrn�+•r• Y i%j plr'S}'y�l�A}:'/IirNx �u �4i �7 .•__..�. r �.w`.I _.� iVy>. :v,1 2. 111i'/ x✓. t .� �. � �.. r_r..r ..v n. • _ 'x' rm //� ��j V�•t _ 1 _ 13 i it li.lwr�_sl�'r°i�i..i :: ;✓::;.,`.I��:�:.�c`uili f f, >if 7 ,� . 6k1'17.4A11' °ce.eY__��•tl,Y _L ! i Y mn..�. .. �.. r .ter. n 6%!e Ao41 8*4 I w\ N „t li e1rW.. Ynrx ��~�f9 '^� _ � IIhry c ����N¢q0 �1•Yrnrrwxry rwrru�YlY-..- _ rN riYr4+NY Y..Y nr� .. 1 � \ [il4v.lEyy��b WYN rrY+Y uu r.u. 1 �—�+ Fur h.1 .IruY1\r1 \�1. 11114NIWYY y1FxI Wr 'MY Yn •r Yx wr �IYlrrr lr�. YY YYYrTM •II Wt1Y Rl41YA4C /WO UT\lR'! CM[MCMi �vCAIC IN iCCi Gi1NG 1OiCET, LL•-~••••• • rr•r•rr. u. •� _w �f �� •V[YOT[Y IR 111Gi M ONNNCNT SET INM1O,N\NO 4-. ..ri 41111•Wllrr_YWIrY1M1r YN1Y 1]II��YIV ANO fAPiO`N(TN MN.RC4 NO.7SET AO]O\N1N4 AlC \ �� 1T RECT I\ 1 ANO ELf U N YNM +. r 1r • V[NOT691O0. MONUMCNT i0UN0 lO1 xONWr. All lOT I%U1NLI UMCt%%ESIMNE NI$ 7NOYN OY TNC fIYT 11•u 1 `�r IN •IIIr1 •I IN,r W r Y ra.Y u Q��b MM •y +_O[NOTCl AVEaOT�IDUa jYpR[lNl( Wt� i ,U irld }r r AT T%% kuxoelAi Tof NltF b ]I�Ia 4814 a, TOt SO\TN\S MTTYQK%9 "us 0, %%KR,, NC Oi v. LINO N I _ ,r kIUCO.TNEc Vlv CY..\L AfWN{0 114[O\!N[0.NOOD MAY. tb a[A]l SCM x•N"[ a,N.{IW.N .YY.Id (N.4 V.b.liUl iEN4R fwa--I-541 Agenda Informat-ion Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five CONTRACT 86-4, APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS E. Contract 86-4, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Brittany 9th Addition) --On November 19, 1985, the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed Brittany 9th Addition was approved as a result of the public hearing process. Subsequently, the Council authorized the appropriation of detailed plans and specifications which have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review and considera- tion of authorizing an advertisement for bid solicitations. The Public. Works Director and Consultant Engineer will be available to d-iscuss these plans in detail at the March '19 meeting, if .necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve for Contract 86-4 (Brittany 9th Addition Streets and authorize advertisement for a bid opening 10:30 a.m, on Thursday, May 1, 1986. the plans and Utilities) to be held at ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 19, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Joint Powers Agreement - Regional Mutual Aid Association 2. Beecher Drive Street Surfacing 3. Project 428, Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer, Final Assessment Roll Adjustment • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 17, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINTSTRATIVE AGENDA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Joint Powers Agreement - Regional Mutual Aid Association --Recently, 28 metropolitan communities and one county have joined forces and created a Regional Mutual Aid Association (RMAA) with the establishment of a related constitution, bylaws and joint powers agreement which was executed by each participant agency. The purpose of this association is to provide public • works related assistance to each other during a declared emergency, to exchange ideas relating to equipment and methods of dealing with emergencies and to protect the lives and property of respective areas in the case of any declared emergency or disaster. This association is similar to mutual aid agreements that the City currently has with its Police and Fire Departments with neighboring communities. The annual dues for membership is $10 per year. The only other costs that would be incurred by the City would be the donation of equipment time and manpower in response to request assistance. Our operational costs (fuel, repair, etc.) is the responsibility of the requesting agency. Other communities close to Eagan who belong to this organization are: Bloomington, R'ichfield', Burnsville, Savage, and Apple Valley. The Public Works Director will be encouraging our other neighboring communities of Rosemount, Inver Grove Heights and • Mendota Heights to also join this association. The Public Works Director will be able to discuss in further detail any questions the Council may have pertaining t this request at the meeting on the 19th. Enclosed on page is a resolution that is requested to be approved by Counc' action regarding this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the joint powers agreement for the Regional Mutual Aid Association and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 2. Beecher Drive Street Surfacing --Enclosed on page is a copy of a letter that the Public Works Director rece ed from a resident within the Eden Addition who has registered a complaint regarding the condition of the unimproved portion of Beecher Drive from Blackhawk Road through the intersection with Walnut Lane. As the Council is aware, Beecher Drive is a gravel road that was turned down for street improvements approximately 8 17� years ago. Since that time, the Eden Addition was developed taking its primary access from Blackhawk Road along a small portion of the unimproved Beecher Drive. With this connection to the Woodgate Addition to the east and the recent improvements to Blackhawk Road and completion of I -35E, this main entrance to the Eden Addition receives an ever increasing amount of traffic along this gravel road portion. Our Maintenance Department has a difficult time maintaining this in an acceptable surface condition especially during the spring pot hole season. See page for a copy of the map referencing this location. Therefore, the Public Works Department would like direction from Council as to whether the City Maintenance Division should proceed with one of the following options: 1) Install a minimum thickness bituminous service through 40 the intersection. 2) Initiate a public improvement process to upgrade that portion of Beecher Drive to a standard city street through the intersection of Walnut Lane and assess Lot 6, Block 2, Clearview Addition for the benefits received. 3) Perform #2 above at City expense. 4) Continue to maintain existing condition as best as possible. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide the appropriate direction to the Public Works Department in response to complaints received pertaining to Beecher Drive intersection with Walnut Lane. Item 3. Project 428, Cedar Industrial Park Trunk Storm Sewer, Final Assessment Roll Adjustment --On March 4, 1986, the final assessment hearing was held for the above referenced project with the final assessment roll being adopted as presented with one exception. After the close of that public hearing, Mr. Jerome Utecht represented by his son Leo- submitted a written objection pertaining to Parcel 10-01700-010-53. At that time, the staff felt that the present senior citizen deferment policy would have addressed the concerns of Mr. Utecht. Therefore, the assessment roll was adopted as originally proposed for this particular parcel. Since that time, Public Works Director has been in contact with Mr. Utech,t's attorney, Robert J. Travers, who has indicated their intent to proceed with a formal appeal based on their contention of lack of benefit. Therefore, in anticipation of this formal appeal, it is recommended that the Council revise the assessment roll adopted on March 4 to remove Parcel 10-01700-01-53 owned by Mr. Jerome Utecht, and to continue it for further review and consideration through the Special Assessment Committee process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:Amend the final assessment roll for Project 428 (Cedar Industrial .P'ark - Trunk Storm Sewer,) to omit Parcel 10-01700-010-53 (Jerome'U,techt) and to forward this parcel to the Special Assessment Committee for review and recommendation by Council at a later date. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH:jh • • i7% Ll • RESOLUTION JOINT/COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT (PUBLIC WORKS PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT) REGIONAL MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION WHEREAS,the City of Eagan desires to become a member of the Regional Mutual Aid Association and its Director of Public Works as its authorized representative and Superintendent of Streets/Equipment its alternative representative; and WHEREAS, a mutual need exists between members of the Regional Mutual Aid Association to share and assist one another in the areas of declared emergencies, disaster control and litigation; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan considers it to be in the best interests of the City to enter into a mutual agreement with the other members of the Regional Mutual Aid Association; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan hereby authorizes the execution of a joint and cooperative agreement with the Regional Mutual Aid Association and hereby authorizes its Director of Public Works to represent the City of Eagan in this association and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute said agreement in behalf of the City of Eagan. ATTEST: By: E.J. Van Overbeke, Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By: Beatta Blomquist, Mayor /7e TV ci z `iEC�I`,'t--fl ?e, p � � Sn�:,� ISIS ( � � �M.�•�.2cQ. 1�� � rn., � l.� �^ w u," � r�..a.,-,..R' c�.�u-w-�� tl,�.-�-� �.n.u--G-(s-„� • TOLL'a CJ O G Yla�_ p ,4j /) _A °, law' ,_ (, ^ �-V--t�c�Y.�, ✓W "V� �-�� ,�v , pj TA, 10 R�,t S. w i...-'4 LACY, a'AW ROAD.._ .,.._"' a .D. ]D.ae° rrliD ND DDDy in -ea xaD 'f •Dxa poem •••i `Sr\ y. pJ• q •,•O O.P T. PS_I "u y m ' � � I m - _ •,�� a �`' � o � 4 �3q �, R4NSpORT4 •� T V m y '� •• J C " ;ow. /CHT O ] • ,r � A K'Du • yrs 9 n' .'�. R 1]D MOx,N y �• ",H � 4y � F Y 9� r � m w •fin . L� t. w • J JJ � N e • • wy � y � Y• m �{ I, \ ,A 1 • m - � C°^� �ct �F �i—.!`—)�.; 1 w �{ � � - F ° — � c .i • •fin � � J J^ � \ a`/ •i.�'GDvv� o•Nv✓ / p1 /o", � m j • • ` ii �-'N �s'9ai'��Pra� l,, r✓s' gwG 1 L : Jwaa� a e'� �4/ �m N �r'r.e "�•'��.,".1:I __ __.a�e �'� uW• • �B I `---' _S, io.�a. e wwo�,.: w 1,00 r 4 ^, 4 O i or r•N m. . • j A O ..G," 111 �' o . � r`.• �• � 7 '" nm � ' �• d � '" ;CLOVER LANE a C` ] p e m f iLFef 11paTrr C� I'••i- , + •i �, %•.c ! _ Q �'�'"- CLOVER LANE m e.r - •r y ' iZul �miam 6 ��S `un i'� w"• tl `Sr , •� —• bd ry _ i m s •n•f s ,rt nt r7 .� y I �; t •wb % II[' S y i{Y �.• axy e � 6 � n i � • y • a 6 ZIIAG 211.76 Ir J m ' " -� s.o ie.i •. me.,o___ _ _.mDR rmn-.. I :. -"'en _ m ._� oiau-- �Ja sG ima e.n w.DD n.or w.00. . � � �� _ •e.,• ���' .`." E_L mn r.r. 'r��a e1' i � 4 e m 3 � "•i' Q 4a• !D �c ``�r ae. p a•s�Jd' � m � m e• w y• lJ�e � � y • i n D•. }9,'FrE� •o L • F . OB •�S + 4 e ''i^ a {il'ft ` +' G m ia + .,I a�J er m S e t • • _ e )) m. aM'n .. O O O •� �1 _-.rr, ' i4y e. a e.a'ae' u�amne'° 1er •fd uw • `pNFR�i4.4.x v i� m' ' BVI I aG f ✓b� n"rxe,r^� n mw , \.N� .,�, X... 1 8 -•E �. ° ; J G, REGULAR MEETING AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL FAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL WEDNESDAY, MARCH 19, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS n 1,A-S3A. Public Hearing, Project 467, Wescott Road (Streets & Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS a u\A, Tollefson Builders for Review & Consideration of Contractor's r, License Suspension (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) W5B. Special Permit (Burton & Mayone Eppen) to Allow a Nursery School Cd for No More Than 10 Students Located at 1658 Woodgate Lane, Lot .12, Block 1, Mallard Park, Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 28 (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS ('9.1 A. Fire Department /-.S D. Public Works Department VvyI B. Police Department 1MSE. Cable Commission Rei. C. Parks & Recreation Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA A. Contractors Licenses 9 B. Personnel Items 1rjo C. P Vacate Tot Lot Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Briar Hill 4th Addition) D. Vacate Trail Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing \e�10 \ (Briar Hill 4th Addition) E. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing �r,\\ JJ (Brittany 7th Addition) oq \2 F. Contract 86-1, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids �( (1986 Spring Parks Construction Project) \1 6\--90N-G. City Contract, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Park Shelter Buildings) \5'r7H. Final Plat Approval, Windtree 5th & 6th Additions (Richardson q Properties) Final Plat Approval, Joseph A. Spande 1st Addition (Roy Spande) �•..-mJ. Project 469, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Towerview Road - Streets) P6j.1AK. Project 470, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Greensboro Addition - Streets & Utilities) �•�3L. Project 471, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer Lateral) �3 M. Contract 84-B, Berkshire Ponds (Streets & Utilities) Final Acceptance V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS n 1,A-S3A. Public Hearing, Project 467, Wescott Road (Streets & Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS a u\A, Tollefson Builders for Review & Consideration of Contractor's r, License Suspension (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) W5B. Special Permit (Burton & Mayone Eppen) to Allow a Nursery School Cd for No More Than 10 Students Located at 1658 Woodgate Lane, Lot .12, Block 1, Mallard Park, Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 28 (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) OLD BUSINESS (Continued) ySIG C. Street Name Designation, I -35E & Deerwood Drive Frontage Road (Continued from March 4, 1986, meeting) D. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission VII. NEW BUSINESS Idrl �oS A. Preliminary Plat (Northwestern Mututal Life Insurance Company) TS for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition for 6 Lots on Approximately 23 Acres & a Rezoning from NB (Neighborhood Business), GB (General Business) & R-4 (Multiple) to Commercial Planned Development Located South of Lone Oak Rd. & West of I - 3 5E, NW 1/2 of Sec. 10 ECFV B. Preliminary Plat (Park Knoll Addition - Tri-Land)for 15 Single - Family Lots on 6.6 Acres & a Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 (Single Family) Located on Outlot B, Oakwood Hts. Add. North of \ y\ Wilderness Run Rd., SE 1/4 of Section 26 r�0.' C. Conditional Use Permit (Burger King Corporation) for a Pylon Sign & Drive-Thru Restaurant Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition, Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Roads, NW 1/4 , \�$ of Sec. 15 Conditional Use Permit (Federal Land Company) for a 20'`Pylon Sign on,Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, Cliff Rd. & Nicols Rd., SE 1/4 of Sec. 30 - E. Conditional Use Permit & Variance (Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc.) V3(o for a Four Gas Pump Island with Canopy Added to Existing Convenience Store on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Addition, Pilot Knob & Yankee Doodle Rd. & Pilot Knob Rd., NE 1/4 of Sec. 16 F. Consideration of Amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use 1� V!:R Regulations, Section 11.20, Annual Review and Termination 1� p -G. Temporary Advertising Sign for Dallas Development lst Addition To Be Located on Applicant's Property at Silver Bell Rd. and J f Highway 13 �j %d�4.I Consideration of Request to Amend Off -Sale Liquor License Policy M. G. Astleford for Request to Review Expenses Relating to the CTC Business Campus Development Agreement 2� \5-�5 'J. Star City Recertification VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS b'0 X57 A. Consideration of Reinstatement of Unchanged Preliminary Plat (Herb Bergstrom) for Blackhawk Acres, West of Blackhawk Road & (,j.k(,,2Adjacent to Robin Lane, SE 1/4 of Sec. 17 B. Contract 86-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Windtree 5th & 6th Additions ) Contract 86-7, Receive Bids/Award Contract (O'Neil's Ponds Storm Sewer) �S- D. Approve Final Plat, Brittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) Flo �O E. Contract 86-4, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids �.\� 11 (Brittany 9th Addition) I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD X. ADJOURNMENT I MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 13, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the March 19, 1986, agenda 'and regular City Council meeting minutes for the March 4 and special minutes for March 11 meetings, the following items are in order for consideration: A. FIRE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Fire Department at this time. B. POLICE DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered under Police Department at this time. C. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT There are no items to be considered for the Parks -& Recreation Department at this time. D. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Greensboro Addition - Revised Preliminary Plat --At the February 18th Council meeting, the Council approved the preliminary plat for the Greensboro Addition (page 3 ) located north of Wescott Road and south of Carriage Hills Golf Course. Subject to that preliminary plat approval, the developer petitioned for the installation of public improvements and would like to proceed with the development of this subdivision in the very near future. However, the developer (Gabbert Development Inc.) wants to develop this subdivision in phases with the first phase consisting of approximately 30 lots. The Public Works Department has informed the developer that any phased development must provide for the looping of the necessary streets and utilities to eliminate any "dead end" situations.. Due to the developers financial constraints on the number of lots for the first phase and the location of the installation of required utilities, the developer has requested consideration for a revision to the previously approved preliminary plat as shown on page_ Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, ITEM 1. CONTINUED Before the City proceeds with the detailed feasibility report and simultaneous preparation of plans and specifications, we want to. be assured that there are no objections to the proposed configuration revision of the previously approved preliminary plat. plat_ The staff will be reviewing the details of the proposed revisions to insure that all lot size and frontage requirements will be met as originally required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the revised preliminary plat configuration for the Greensboro Addition. N. 0 5 LEX1NG70N PLACE SOUTH PROPOSED STREETS 010-e0 9 ro Z3 ,V STREET LEXINGTON — SOUARE GREENSBORO ADDITION STREETS PROJECT No. 470 EAGAN, MINNESOTA o md :od 3w a«u, 010-s1 010-01 BONESTROO, RQSENE. ANDER 11[ 8 A880ClATES. INC. Coneylting Engineer& 8L Paul Minn. Date: MAR CONIUL 4937867.FIS- No. 4 `, /�//. IVA I I I---- D- +"•3 ----_j I I �M I I o md :od 3w a«u, 010-s1 010-01 BONESTROO, RQSENE. ANDER 11[ 8 A880ClATES. INC. Coneylting Engineer& 8L Paul Minn. Date: MAR CONIUL 4937867.FIS- No. 4 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three PUBLIC 'WORKS DEPARTMENT (Continued) Item 2. Water Distribution System - Energy Study --The Public Works Director and Superinte.ndent of Utilities have been evaluating our water supply and distribution system since the recent completion of the water treatment plant, modification to several wells and the construction of the additional booster station on Lexington Avenue. Due to the fact that several power users in our distribution and supply system are scattered throughout the city in different power supply zones _.(NSP and DEA), combined with the varying rate structures for peak versus off-peak use and pending rate increases, it is highly recommended that a comprehensive detail energy use study be performed on our system to maximize efficiency and power cost savings. We have been working with a firm called Triangle Engineering, Inc., that was formulated by two individuals who presently work with the City of St. Paul Water Department who have prepared an energy evaluation software program specifically for municipal applications. The Public Works Director has received a formal proposal to perform this analysis on our system for cost of $14,500.00 which is fully guaranteed. If the City does not recognize a cost savings of at least this amount in its first year of implementation, it is 1008 refundable. A preliminary review of our system and the implementation of this program indicates that the City could save approximately $40,000.00 to $50,00.0.0'0 annually which is approximately 208 of our present energy cost. Therefore, the Staff is requesting, authorization to hire Triangle Engineering to perform this energy audit study during 1986. ACTION'TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize the hiring of • Triangle Engineering, Inc. to perform a water system management energy study for cost of $14,500 and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. E. CABLE COMMISSION There are no items at this time. to be considered under Cable 91 Commission Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four -'CONSENT" AGENDA There are thirteen ( 13 ) items on the agenda referred to as Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on pagesd � is a list of contrac- tors who are renewing or .who have beep selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references • from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor licenses as presented. P TRACTORS LICENSES MARCH 19, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. A PLUS REALTY, INC 2. BARSNESS CONSTRUCTION 7 3. BLILIE CONSTRUCTION CO 4. BURR OAK BUILDERS INC 5. CORPORATE CONSTRUCTION INC 6. DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION 7. DUANE J BUILDERS INC ® 8. FML INC 9. GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT 10. HAM MAR ENTERPRISES INC 11. JAMESON BUILDERS 12. JOHNSON-REILAND CONSTRUCTION INC 13. KEYLAND HOMES 14. OZMUN-PEDERSON INC 15. PANELCRAFT OF MN 16. BILL RICHIE SIS MAINTENANCE ® 17. ROSEWOOD CONTRUCTION INC 18. SAFETY-KLEEN CORPORATION 19. SONS CONSTRUCTION CO 20. U.S. HOMES CORP 21. VALLEY INVESTMENT CONSTRUCTION 22. ZACHMAN BROS CONSTRUCTION MASONRY, CEMENT WORK 1. FIGG MASONRY 7 WATER SOFTENER 1. COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER 2. DONAHUE MECHANICAL INC HEATING/VENTILATING 1. AIR COMFORT INC 2. ARNESON HEATING 3. CENTRAL HEATING & A/C 4. DOMESTIC MECHANICAL 5. GOLDEN VALLEY HTG & A/C 6. HORWITZ INC 7. J & B SHEETMETAL INC 8. NORTHERN PLUMBING & HTG 9. SBS MECHANICAL 10. GEORGE SEDGWICK HTG & A/C PLUMBERS - 1. DONAHUE MECHANICAL INC 2. EAGAN PLUMBING 3. HORWITZ INC 4. MAPLEWOOD SEWER & WATER INC 5. .METROPOLITAN MECHICANICAL CONTRACTORS 6. SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING 7. LEE STULL PLUMBING Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items --There are four (4) Personnel Items to be given consideration. Item 1. Administrative Intern --An Administrative Intern position for Administration was approved in the 1986 Budget. After screen- ing six applications, four applicants were interviewed by City Administrator Hedges. Presently, reference checks are being conducted on these four applicants. The City Administrator will furnish the Council with a name to be considered for this position either on the Administrative Agenda or at the City Council meeting on Wednesday, March 19. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of an Administrative Intern for Administration for a six-month period in 1986. Item 2. Parks Maintenance Worker --An additional Parks Maintenance Worker was approved in 1986 Budget. The Parks Department would like to know fill this vacancy. Authorization is needed to advertise for and to fill the vacant Parks Maintenance Worker position. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement for a Parks Maintenance Worker. Item 3. Road Maintenance Worker --Over 250 applications were received by the City for this vacancy. After screening all those applications, 30 applicants were invited to the Eagan • Municipal Center to take a written test. From these 30, five applicants were interviewed by Street Superintendent Erhart, Street Supervisor Lundsten and Administrative Assistant Duffy. Their recommendation for filling this vacancy will be included in the Administrative Packet on Monday. The hiring of this applicant would be contingent upon successful completion fo the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of staff's recommended candidate for the Road Maintenance Worker vacancy, contingent upon successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. a Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six VACATE TOT LOT EASEMENT/BRIAR HILL FOURTH ADDITION C. Vacate Tot Lot Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Briar Hill 4th Addition) --we have received a petition to vacate a portion of Lot 15, Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition that encroaches into the existing 50 -foot -wide tot lot easement dedi- cated by separate deed document with the Briar Hill 4th Addition. Preliminary review by staff indicates that this encroachment and subsequent vacation of the related easement would not compromise the integrity or ultimate,use of this easement for tot lot purposes. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and schedule a public hearing to be held April 15th for the vacation of a portion of the tot lot easement over Lot 15, Block • 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition. VACATE TRAIL EASEMENT/BRIAR HILL 4TH ADDITION D. Vacate Trail Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Briar Hill 4th Addition) --We have received a petition to vacate the trailway easement presently dedicated over the common lot line of Lots 29, 30, 31 and 32, of Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition. This .trailway easement along this lot line runs through an existing four-plex dwelling unit. In consideration of vacating this 10 -foot -wide trailway easement, the staff will be requesting a similar trailway easement dedication along the northerly lot lines of Lots 29 and 30. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and schedule the public hearing to be held on April 15,; 1986, for .the vacation of a trailway easement over Lots 29-32, Block 1, of Briar Hill 4th Addition. /0 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven VACATE, UTILITY EASEMENT/BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION E. VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT', RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION) --On February 4th, the Council held a public hearing to discuss the vacation of a portion of a sanitary sewer utility line easement over Lot 5, Block 2, of the Brittany 7th Addition, resulting from a three-foot encroachment of the dwelling unit on that lot. At that public hearing, there was considerable concern expressed by the Council regarding this encroachment and the resulting liability that might be assumed by the City if this encroachment were allowed and partial easement vacation approved. Since that time, the staff has worked with the developer/petitioner in initiating the City required soil correction work necessary to minimize the future City. liability related with this vacation approval. With this soil correction work recently being initiated, the developer 'has repetitioned for consideration for the vacation of a portion of this easement to allow the encroachment of the dwelling unit. This vacation is necessary before the City will perform the final inspection and allow occupancy to occur. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To receive the petition to vacate a portion of the utility easement for Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition and schedule the public hearing to be held April 15, 1986. • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight CONTRACT 8'6-1/SPRING PARKS CONSTRUCTION F. Contract 86-1, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids for 1986 Spring Parks Construction --The Director of Parks & Recreation presented final plans for the improvement of five (5) parks that are scheduled as a part of the 1986 parks construc- tion program. These plans were presented at a special City Council meeting held on March 11, 1986. Those parks that are proposed for improvement are Meadowlands Park, Blue Cross Park, Pilot Knob Park, South Oaks .Park and Quarry Park. The detailed cost analysis will be prepared and distributed as a part of the Administrative Packet for your review. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and authorize advertisement for bids with a bid opening on April 12, 1986. CONTRACT 86-9/FOR PARK SHELTER BUILDINGS G. City Contract 86-9, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids for Park Shelter Buildings --The plans for five (5) park shelter buildings were reviewed by the Parks and Recreation Director at a Special City Council meeting on March 11, 1986.. Upon review it was determined that the plans and specifications and advertisement for bids would be in order for consideration at the March 19 City Council meeting. For -a copy of the park shelter building/construction financing refer to a memo that was prepared by the Director of Parks and Recreation and distribu- ted at the Special City C uncil meeting. This memo is enclosed on pages __1-3through 1. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans • and specifications and authorize and advertisement for bids with an opening on April 12, 1986. /Z..' of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL Coonoil Members THOMAS. HEDGES Gty P rn neuww FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk DATE: MARCH 11, 1986 RE: PARK SHELTER BUILDING - FINANCING The Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission has been reviewing the Park Shelter Building program, and at the February 6 Commission Meeting approved and recommended the following budget and financing plan: PARK SHELTER BUILDING PROJECTED COST Trapp Farm Park Pavilion $106,000.00 Trapp Farm Shelter 82,000.00 Goat Hill 96,000.00 Rahn 57,000.00 Northview 91,000.00 TOTAL $432,000.00 Contingency +30,000.00 GRAND TOTAL $462,000.00 The City staff and architect have carefully reviewed the cost projections and are reasonably comfortable with these figures. A contingency of approximately 7% or $30,000 has been added to cover possible revisions and cost increases in materials between the time that these estimates were prepared and final bidding. FINIANCING Cost to cover the construction program has been funded through the Park Bond and Park Site Fund as follows: Park Bond Fund Park Site Fund $318,000.00 1447000.00• $462,000.00 °Includes Contingency /3 THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY o. e TIME LIRE: Staff has scheduled a meeting with the architects for this Friday, March 14, to review final plans and specifications. Assuming City Council concurrence with the revised Goat Hill Shelter, and minor or minimal changes at the staff review on Friday; the council will be presented with a request to go out for bids at the City Council Meeting, March 19, with a bid opening for April 12th, and a bid award April 15th. (Tentative) KV/bls • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page ,Nine FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/WINDTREE 5TH & 6TH ADDITIONS H. Final Plat Approval, Windtree 5th & 6t,h Additions (Richardson Properties) --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Windtree 5th & 6th Additions located north of Wescott Road and east of Elrene Road as shown on pages %1a/ % All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on November 5, 1985 have been complied with satisfactorily. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. 15 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Windtree 5th and 6th Additions and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents, 15 ® EXHIBIT "A" W I N D T R E E ,..5TH aD I ., ra+D.I, Fe I...:... I: :iu �.8 \' �•I iA L. IO e` •\.v��J .w.. i--. la 9 ,� . •D . . Ie II �'� FY C\'�•Il. �. (ri ee .D tl 19 Y U: • io lai I\ yp � F -�1 Fro ;r ,. ... P IIIc. Vlarwlr Y Ii IIITI .'� RON KRUEGER AND ASSOCIATES Lm .D. pmu a.uu.ra ra+D.I, ear n... I...:... I: :iu e1J ,,. 1 Grp• f ::i:: ':i" : •:1.11., ::�`: �: :�: ui.: : ulna ua TI: Y. m. u.re..v.•.. ..a .I•o-l.. c.... W. ........ Wr ... .nl• ...e..n: v I p 0p u L0p 1 e Daup,L. lep• nW u•[el 1 1„ • 11•w I.w m•WL•1 ur u0 •A•L.D .l r •D"1111.. m0111p1 a u.Wm 10'rIL1DI •n l• a11•'LI' I'D, 1AII.I.T. Ill 11 D 1`'I• "IT. 1•, nu ala :D.eu: L..a•DD•.unn .wD W LIT A D D I T ION L•. rel le.r Y ur•er l• a Vr, rL• •1•u•r•u r, ua [• ,r, • W,nL•, eL.a, nl nlnn•,sr. rn .1•r ' • I .rl r.r .1 IDIt $119 .1 0.tlll c11. w:a1•r ..1/ 11 II.DTIEK l.. � r+ . v1.L. le.r. u...•. c. r•..Iv,..u•..,+ Ir v ..n • ...c ::r 'd I...:... I: :iu e1J ,,. 1 Grp• f ::i:: ':i" : •:1.11., ::�`: �: :�: : I—. ........ .1 ....niu. .a u....., n• 11.1 .1 .eu .1.DTIL.+:•: ADDur W. .,. ...r. a.. .u., . L. ,.. Y. m. u.re..v.•.. ..a .I•o-l.. c.... W. ........ Wr ... .nl• ...e..n: v .....n. D. .ID... 'u er w rur r .lour m+ lu urwrm u:l.. .0 l..e . —_ • —__�_ _ ------ - -----RECEIVCD FEB 2 0 1936 "In..r•u.nl � o.l.u..+ ou +.l el_ 1 D• .I uce.rp.v. •r.Y rLl...'Inc.• . D.....�(:•V.r rl. .n TiF�l l•er.l•. c.r Po•:[Ien— ;1.. :':L:... CP:.J. :::: .. J Y .., .W.. ,n... ...n....Yl•' .L..,.J ., , L ... .......... .r Yy1�• _- a.n...L...a.. v::.1....... 11.1:a .vol..... unl °"• • e. m.. .. A _ r r,.0 L. ......... ::: =�.�i ..r.D• ..rr l• rl•.r .n ....I.. [..ncll .r . n..r.....L.. ....J ..1.clmll ra..u.e. Le fn•nn m, u.. .1 nm.....r.dnl. ul• rl..... .... •rw".:TGi+.I .....r .. _F., r.. I..J u..c.l D.e w• •.I• WL., .. -01-1 I•• npDlllu. rr nu Jnlrna. v, u... J.....J ,rr....l.i ...uuu , • • 0 u. [cool •.'.In r� •Irnii I-In:ii::ini .na ... J.1. r..er..0 In I... ..car r J SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS EXHIBIT "A" SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/JOSEPH A. SPANDE 1ST ADDITION I. Final Plat Approval, Joseph A.,Spande 1st Addition (Roy Spande)- We have received an application for final plat approval for the subdivision of the existing large lot located at the southeast corner of Ridgeview Terrace and Highview Avenue as shown on page All conditions of the preliminary plat approval by Coil action on. August 20, 1985 have been complied with satis- factorily. All final plat application materials have been submit- ted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Joseph A. Spande lst Addition and authorize Ehe Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. R EXHIBIT "A" • JOSEPH A. SPANDE I ST 1• y li�'�Eeo 8. • ;F� B ^`L•....' i i • FR NORTH 2 +• Ec CEPT°M•...... ..... 6d? 9, � • \_ - p+'nr a ..: ".: NO rµ,` \ e.e �4 � r /_ 1 ' °•.�n„'.�t.� 1._. 1 [n .rrl. . � 3�. S -I1N 9619 .troll. �•° I. . Inn —.1 tl DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC. LOCATION MAP m] M t 9 c sc..a ADDITION - �7rS Y Tm: b:. Il . - - -- _ - - - oss n..a nm,v . --.....: ,:...[ .. n ...w..'F:.c .t,le� � x•., _ ._ n_ar. .. [e..—f.. ['1. � E., [ - . .11 lr�mr,r roc 1 a[1. a. w cwl.u..n [�..tvun [.. o. ••I.0 [.. n r. l.a.,wn [n ro .[t Ilio. °e .ut 1.+... 1 o. 1+. 1.n.ol— sw.e:v•. e.-[ce:.:. ....c.w. Lc t. rnn . ... a..+w c.luh vat ... t[. GeV or . 19_/n. ]L. ..xl, of ) _. oI . .. Cin..0 lu� t t. CIv°we :1.. !....r •1,n.uw. Iv). .. ".I ,. Vu I. �,. ntw ... .. v I9—S.. ! .— m I.. pI., u . Aa l,..11 tnu _eq o I- .... n.'...I I... nw .,e l..n..l If . 1._, . F.e. • [..Im. n_[. _.[ 1-+ mo. ..[ �.n pool ..m -x ...,n... lot. :.+v. non...[. L � L /1 a Iln.. m 1.. DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC. LOCATION MAP m] M t 9 c sc..a ADDITION - �7rS Y Tm: b:. Il . - - -- _ - - - oss n..a nm,v . --.....: ,:...[ .. n ...w..'F:.c .t,le� � x•., _ ._ n_ar. .. [e..—f.. ['1. � E., [ - . .11 lr�mr,r roc 1 a[1. a. w cwl.u..n [�..tvun [.. o. ••I.0 [.. n r. l.a.,wn [n ro .[t Ilio. °e .ut 1.+... 1 o. 1+. 1.n.ol— sw.e:v•. e.-[ce:.:. ....c.w. Lc t. rnn . ... a..+w c.luh vat ... t[. GeV or . 19_/n. ]L. ..xl, of ) _. oI . .. Cin..0 lu� t t. CIv°we :1.. !....r •1,n.uw. Iv). .. ".I ,. Vu I. �,. ntw ... .. v I9—S.. ! .— m I.. pI., u . Aa l,..11 tnu _eq o I- .... n.'...I I... nw .,e l..n..l If . 1._, . F.e. • [..Im. n_[. _.[ 1-+ mo. ..[ �.n pool ..m -x ...,n... lot. :.+v. non...[. L i DELMAR H. SCHWANZ LAND SURVEYORS INC. LOCATION MAP m] M t 9 c sc..a ADDITION - �7rS Y Tm: b:. Il . - - -- _ - - - oss n..a nm,v . --.....: ,:...[ .. n ...w..'F:.c .t,le� � x•., _ ._ n_ar. .. [e..—f.. ['1. � E., [ - . .11 lr�mr,r roc 1 a[1. a. w cwl.u..n [�..tvun [.. o. ••I.0 [.. n r. l.a.,wn [n ro .[t Ilio. °e .ut 1.+... 1 o. 1+. 1.n.ol— sw.e:v•. e.-[ce:.:. ....c.w. Lc t. rnn . ... a..+w c.luh vat ... t[. GeV or . 19_/n. ]L. ..xl, of ) _. oI . .. Cin..0 lu� t t. CIv°we :1.. !....r •1,n.uw. Iv). .. ".I ,. Vu I. �,. ntw ... .. v I9—S.. ! .— m I.. pI., u . Aa l,..11 tnu _eq o I- .... n.'...I I... nw .,e l..n..l If . 1._, . F.e. • [..Im. n_[. _.[ 1-+ mo. ..[ �.n pool ..m -x ...,n... lot. :.+v. non...[. Agenda Information Memo March 19., 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven PROJECT 469, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING J. Project 469, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Towerview Road - Streets) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the Lemay Lake Hills Addition (Martin Shields Property), the Council authorized the preparation of a 'feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scedul'ing a public hearing to discuss these proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the feasibility report for Project 469 (Towerview Road - Streets) and order the public hearing to be held April 15, 1986. • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 470, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING K. Project 470, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Greensboro Addition - Streets & Utilities) --In response to a petition submitted by the developer for the proposed Greensboro Addition, the Council authorized the preparation of the feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to discuss these proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 470, Greensboro Addition (Streets and Utilities) and schedule a public hearing to be held April 15, 1986. • • a/ • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen PROJECT 471, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING L_ Project 471, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (West Service Drive - Lateral Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition received from Northwestern Mutual Life Inusrance Company, the Council authorized appropriation of a feasibility, report which is now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to discuss the proposed installation of lateral storm sewer facilities to handle the future development of several lots within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 471, (West Service Drive Lateral Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 15,•1986. M Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meet-ing Page Fourteen CONTRACT 84-B., BERKSHIRE PONDS/FINAL ACCEPTANCE M. Contract 84-B, Berkshire Ponds (Streets & Utilities)/Final. Acceptance --The installation of streets and' utilities necessary to service the Berkshire Ponds Addition was installed privately by the developer in accordance with City approved plans & specifi- cations. All final inspections have been performed by repre- sentatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM,: Accept Berkshire Ponds (Streets & Utilities) for maintenance. Contract 84-B, perpetual City 0 • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 196'6, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PUBLIC HEARING/PROJECT 467, WESCOTT ROAD (STREETS & UTILITIES) A. Public Hearing, Project 467, Wescott Road (Street & Utilities)— In response to a petition submitted by the developers of the Greensboro Addition (Gabbert Development) and the Lexington Square 2nd Addition (Northland Mortgage Company), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report to discuss the proposed upgrading of Wescott Road from Lexington Avenue to one-half mile east. This feasibility report was completed and forwarded to the Council on February 18 with the Public Hearing being scheduled for March 19. Enclosed on pages • 2 through T3 is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information ,and review during the Public Hearing. The Public Works Director and Consulting Engineer will be available to discuss in further detail the improvements proposed under this project. is All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 467, Wescott Road (Streets & Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. ON WESCOTT ROAD ® (LEXINGTON AVENUE TO 1/2 MILE EAST* UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 467 FOR ® EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49381 can" 4-W9, is e'a a� ook, /JOKE, 04� , 4 . I & 4 r nKC. Clean A. Gooch P.E. '`/ LNJL/Y_/_N/MLL J A'rirF A. Gordon, P.E. Oua G, Bnnaunn. P, E Thomas E. Noyes. P, E. e0 Nnhr.r R', Na vnr, P.F. Riehard W. Faster. P.E. lmrph C And -0. P.E. Rabrn G. Sahar,lhl. P.E. 1335 '7U. i+...d o4q, ..ry 36 11.o.0a..I A. I n,h,,, P.E. Marvin L. Soroala, P.E. NirhurJ E. Tuinrr, P.E. Donald C. Bugordr, P.E. Af ....& 55113 J. ,v, C. 0A.o, P.E, Jury A. Bou.dan, P.E. oda..: 612 -636-4600 Musk A. Hamm, PE. T,d A'- Field, P.E. Miehael T Rourmann. P.E. Rohrer R. P1e1f d,,, P.E January 10, 1986 David O. Loskam PE Charles A. Erirksan Le. M. Pawalska Matto M. Olson Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Wescott Road (Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile east) - Street and Utility Improvements Project No. 467 File No. 49381 Dear Mayor and Council: Enclosed is our report for Wescott Road (Lexington Avenue to 1/2 mile east), Project No. 467. This report covers utility and street improvements and in— cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark( A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws ofthe State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson �.' Date: January 10, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved b'."�'�"-`..•'.-'1,,,� PP by:,,. Department of P&blic Works Date • 20 z b% - 2848d 74 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of Wescott Road from Lex- ington Avenue easterly approximately 1/2 mile. Also included is the construc- tion of sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer. Wescott Road is abutted by. Lexington Square Addition and an unplatted, undeveloped parcel to the south. To the north it is abutted by the proposed Greensboro -Addition, 3 large unplatted but homesteaded parcels and a large platted undeveloped parcel within Williams and Larue Addition. Wescott Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street in the City of Eagan. Therefore the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance ® with Municipal State Aid standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT for the re- view and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as out'lined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein .includes extending the trunk sanitary sewer in Wescott Road which is presently under contract as part of Project No. 433, Lexington Square 2nd Addition.: The 12" diameter trunk sani- tary sewer is anticipated being completed in the spring of 1986. Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to extend the sanitary sewer easterly in Wescott Road as a 10" diameter pipe to the proposed easterly north -south street in the proposed Greensboro Addition (Parcel 010-51, Section 14). The sanitary sewer will continue easterly as an 8" diameter pipe to the east line of Greensboro Addition. Two 8" diameter stubs will be constructed northerly to serve Greensboro Addition. Page 1. 2848d �J Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a12" diameter trunk water main in Wescott Road. The 12" trunk main will connect to the 12" trunk main proposed as part Project No. 450, Williams and Larue 1st 6 2nd Ad- ditions. The proper number of valves and hydrants is also included. Property abutting Wescott Road is located in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressure of approximately 67 and 50 psi re- spectively. Services - It is proposed to provide an L?" diameter water service to each of the 3 existing residential homes located on the north side of Wescott Road. It is also proposed to provide 2 - 6" diameter water stubs to Greensboro Addi- tion and 1 - 6" diameter water stub to Outlot A in Lexington Square. Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes two separate lateral sys- tems, as shown on the attached drawing. The westerly system provides for con- structing a 15" diameter storm sewer pipe easterly from the trunk storm sewer to be constructed as part of Project No. 450 Williams and Larue 1st and 2nd Addition. The easterly system provides for constructing a combination of 24", 21", and 18" diameter storm sewer pipe westerly from the trunk storm sewer to be constructed as part of Project No. 433 Lexington Square 2nd Addition. The • proper number of catch basins and inlets are also.included to properly convey drainage from the adjacent property abutting Wescott Road. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes upgrading Wescott Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 52' width. A 5' wide concrete sidewalk is proposed on the north side and an 8' wide bituminous trail is proposed on the south side. . The grading of Wescott Road will generate approximately 7,000 cubic yards of excess material. It is anticipated this material will be placed in Lot 4 of Williams and Larue Addition. aw 2848d Page 2. ;! 9 EASEMENTS: Permanent and ,temporary easements are required to construct Wes- cott Road. The estimated amount of temporary and permanent easement required from each parcel is listed below: Page 3. 2848d Permanent Temporary Parcel Easement Easement Description (Acre) (Acre) SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addn.) 0.52 0.61 Parcel 030-53 0.13 0.12 Parcel 041-53 0 0.15 Parcel 050-53 0.13 0.12 WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST ADDITION Lot 4 0 0.13• NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 0.14 0.13 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 0.41 0.62 Lot 18-31, Block 1 0 0.27. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: - ASSESSMENT AREA • SW 1/4 SECTION 14. Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addn.) Parcel 030-53 Parcel 041-53 Parcel 050-53 WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A Lots 18-31, Blk. 1 Page 3. 2848d COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 32,630 Water Main 81,650 Services 8,660 Storm Sewer 93,950 Street 398,530 TOTAL ........................ $615,420 The total estimated project cost is $615,420 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- • of -way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of�the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered trunk. However, the 10" diameter line in Wescott Road is also required to serve the easterly portion and additional areas in the proposed Greensboro Addition. Because the sanitary sewer line as indicated is necessary to service the Greensboro Addi- tion, it is proposed to assess this portion of sewer the lateral benefit from trunk rate per centerline foot to Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addition). The 8" diameter sewer stubs serving Parcel 010-51 are also proposed to be assessed at the lateral benefit from trunk rate per centerline foot. Page 4. 2848d 30 WATER MAIN: The 12" water main proposed under this project is considered trunk. Therefore, it is proposed to assess those parcels benefiting from the trunk water main at the lateral benefit from trunk rate. It is also proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area water main which have not been previ- ously assessed as shown on the attached drawing. Parcels 030-53, 041-53, and 050-53 are single family residences and have more than 200' of frontage abut- ting Wescott Road and are larger than 3 acres. For these types of parcels As- sessment policy 86-3 provides for assessing only 100' of front footage for Lateral benefit from trunk main and 1 acre of each lot for trunk area assess- ments. The remaining assessment amounts will be levied at the time of devel- opment. Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro) is being assessed for ' of its frdnt foot- age. This assessment reflects looping benefit because no direct connections are proposed. Outlot A of Lexington Square Addition is proposed to be as- sessed its full frontage because its related credit for access looping is ap- plied against the 1st Addition. . SERVICES: Services are proposed to be asessed based -on the total cost of each service to each benefiting parcel. STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is to be assessed as trunk and lat- eral. It is proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area storm sewer as- sessment which have not been previously assessed. Lateral storm sewer is pro- posed to be assessed at the equivalent assessment rate to all the platted and unplatted parcels with the exception of Outlot A of Lexington Square Addition and Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addition). The equivalent assessment rate is to be assessed against the entire frontage of Lots 18-31, Block 1 Lexington .Square Addition, Lot 4 Williams and Larue Addition, and Parcel 016-25. How- ever, a corner lot credit of 75' is applied to Lot 4, Williams and Larue Addi- tion and Parcel 016-25. Parcel 030-53, 041-53, and 050-53 are large unplatted Page 5. 2848d 3/ parcels which are homesteaded and are to be assessed the equivalent assessment rate in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3. Similar to the water main as- sessment, this policy provides that only 100' of frontage for these types of parcels is to be assessed. Lateral storm sewer assessment to Parcel- 010-51 (Greensboro Addition) and Outlot A Lexington Square Addition is to be assessed based on the cost to con- struct the easterly storm sewer segment and the drainage area that it bene- fits. However, the cost to be assessed excludes the cost of a 12" equivalent trunk storm sewer from Pond JP -32A to the existing trunk located on the east line of Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro Addition) in Wescott Road. The assessed cost against the benefited drainage area within each parcel was then'deter- mined and converted to an assessment rate per front foot based on the front footage of that parcel that abuts Wescott Road. STREET: Street is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis based on the residential equivalent rate to all the residential parcels (platted and unplatted) in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3 with the exception of. Parcel 016-25. Parcel 016-25 is proposed to be assessed its full residential equivalent rate because it is not homesteaded or considered residential. A corner lot credit of 75' was applied to Lot 4 Williams and Larue Addition and Parcel 016-25. The platted lots in Lexington Square Addition which back onto - Wescott Road and take access onto Briar Creek Road are not proposed to be as- sessed. The large unplatted parcels (030-53, 041-53, and 050-53) 'which are homesteaded are to be assessed based on 100' of front footage in accordance with Assessment Policy 86-3. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: . Page 6. 2848d 3y r Page 7. 2848d 03 SANITARY SEWER _ Lateral Benefit from Trunk $28.69/centerline foot WATER MAIN Trunk Area: Single -Family $1,190/Ac. Lateral Benefit from Trunk: Single -Family $11.88/F.F. STORM SEWER: Trunk Area: Single Family/Agricultural $0.05/sq.ft. Lateral Benefit from Trunk $9.80/F.F. ® STREET Residential Equivalent $33.75/F.F. 1/2 Residential Equivalent $16.88/F.F. REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk $32,630 Lateral Benefit from Trunk $20,944 • $32,630 $20,944 -$11,686 WATER MAIN Trunk $81,650 Lateral Benefit from Trunk $ 24,939 Trunk Area 115,620 $81,650 $140,559 +$58,909 SERVICES Lateral $ 8,660 Lateral Assessment $ 8,660 $ 8,660 $ 8,660 - 0 - r Page 7. 2848d 03 STORM SEWER AND STREET Storm Sewer $ 93,950 Street $398,530 Lateral Storm Sewer & Street Assessment $119,257 Trunk Area Storm Sewer 8,250 $492,480 $127,507 —$364,973 TOTAL —$317,750 The anticipated project deficit is $317,750. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans & Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 8. 2848d 3� is 2/18/86 3/18/86 4/86 5/86 Fall/86 Spring/87 May/88 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 467 A) SANITARY SEWER 340 Lin.ft. 10" PVC San. sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $14.00/l.f. 330 Lin.ft. 10" PVC San. sewer, 15'-25' dp. in pl. @ $26.00/l.f. 250 Lin.ft. 8" PVC San. sewer, 0'-15' dp. in pl. @ $12.00/l.f. 4 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 25 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Connect PVC to ex. MH @ $500.00/each 150 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 920 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies . ® +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. h Bond Interest TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ................................ Page 9. 2848d 35 $ 4,760 8,580 3,000 3,600 1,500 1,000 1,500 $24,860 1.240 $26,100 6.530 $32,630 B) WATER MAIN 2,280 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water main in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 60 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in p1. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 3 Each 12" Butterfly valve 6 box @ $1,000.00/each 2 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $400.00/each 1,500 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.50/lb. 1 Each Connect 12" DIP to existing 12" DIP @ $500.00/each 50 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 2,280 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest TOTAL WATER MAIN ..................................... Page 10. 2848d 3(1 $50,160 720 2,000 3,000 800 2,250 500 500 2,280 $62,210 3,110 $65,320 16,330 $81,650 • • • C) SERVICE 170 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 170 Lin.ft. 1�" Type K copper in pl. @ $10.00/lin.ft. 3 Each 12" x 6" Tee in pl. @ $300.00/each 3 Each lz" Corporation stop in pl. @ $40.00/each 3 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve S box @ $400.00/each 3 Each 1'z" Curb stop 5 box @ $100.00/each 340 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest TOTAL SERVICES ...................................... Page 11. 2848d 37 $ 2,040 1,700 900 120 1,200 . 300 340- $ 6,600 330 $ 6,930 1,730 $ 8,660 D) STORM SEWER 160 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. $ 5,120 270 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,560 710 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/1in.ft. 18,460 710 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 15,620 170 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 3,400 5 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 4,500 5 Each Std. 4' dia. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 4,500 9 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 7,200 . 3 Each 12" RCP flared end section @ $600.00/each 1,800 • 1 Each Connect 24" RCP to ex. MH @ $400.00/each 400 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,020 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,020 Total $71,580 +5% Contingencies 3,580 $75,160 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 18,790 TOTAL STORM SEWER .................................. $93,950 Page 12. 28484 3� $318,820 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 79,710 TOTAL STREET ............... :...................... $398,530 Page 13. 2848d 3 E) STREET LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees '@ $3,000.00/L.S. $ 3,000 13,500 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $1.80/cu.yd. 24,300 2,000 Cu.yds. Subgrade excavation @ $2.00/cu.yd. 4,000 1,000 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $5.00/cu.yd. 5,000 14,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (street) @ $5.00/ton 70,000 1,050 Ton Class 5 aggregate base (trail) @ $7.00/ton 7,350 3,400 Ton Bituminous base course @ $11.00/ton 37,400 1,300 Ton Bituminous wear course (street) @ $12.00/ton 15,600 • 300 Ton Bituminous wear course (trail) @ $15.00/ton 4,500 280 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $210.00/ton 58,800 650 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.60/gal. 1,040 5,100 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb & gutter @ $5.50/lin.ft. 28,050 12,750 Sq.ft. Concrete sidewalk w/granular base @ $2.00/sq.ft. 25,500 25 Each Adjust MH & CB frame @ $200.00/each 5,000 4 Each Adjust valve box @ $150.00/each 600 4,000 Sq.yds. Sodding @ $1.50/sq.yd. 6,000 ® 5.0 Acre Seeding w/fertilizer & mulch @ $1,500.00/ac. 7,500 Total $303,640 +5% Contingencies 15,180 $318,820 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 79,710 TOTAL STREET ............... :...................... $398,530 Page 13. 2848d 3 SUMMARY A. SANITARY SEWER $ 32,630 B. WATER MAIN 81,650 C. SERVICE 8,660 D. STORM SEWER 93,950 E. STREET 398.530 TOTAL ....................... $615,420 • • Page 14. 2848d /' • APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 467 A. SANITARY SEWER a.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Assessable Description Footage SW 1/4 'SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 730 TOTAL B. WATER MAIN a.) Lateral BEnefit from Trunk Rate/Center- Total line Foot Assessment $28.69 Parcel Front Assessable Description Footage Credit Footage Rate/F.F. SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 1,325 662 663 $11.875 Parcel 030-53 330 230 (1) 100 11.875 Parcel 041-53 330 230(1) 100 11.875 Parcel 050-53 335 235(1) 100 11.875 ® NW 1/4 SECTION 23 $ 20,944 $ 20,944 Total Assessment $ '7,873 1,188 1,188 1,188 Parcel 016-25 82 $11.875 $ 974 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 1,055 $11.875 12,528 TOTAL $ 24,939 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. Page 15. 2848d B) WATER MAIN (Cont'd.) b.) Trunk Area NW 1/4 SECTION 23 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 61' 1 $1,687 $ 1,687 TOTAL $ 8,660 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. Page 16. 2848d Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Total Description (ac.) (ac.) (ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 39.28 Pond (1.8) Str. 207 29,98 $1,190 $ 35,676 Parcel 030-53 4.75 $3.75(1) 1.0 1,190 1,190 Parcel 041-53 4.62 3.62(1) 1.0 1,190 1,190 Parcel 050-53 4.82 3.82(1) 1.0 1,190 1,190 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 • LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 81.72 Pond (1.5) Str. 207 64.18 $1,190 $ 76,374 TOTAL $115,620 C) SERVICE (Water) Parcel Service No. of Total Description Size Services Cost/Service Assessment SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 6" 2 $1,687 $ 3,374 Parcel 030-53 1I" 1 1,200 1,200 Parcel 041-53 1Y" 1 1,200 1,200 • Parcel 050-53 1I" 1 1,200 1,200 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 61' 1 $1,687 $ 1,687 TOTAL $ 8,660 (1) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. Page 16. 2848d D. STORM SEWER b.) Trunk Area Parcel Description NW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 041-53 Parcel 050-53 TOTAL Assessable Area Credit Rate Total 201,247 s.f. 118,747 s.f. (1) 82,500 s.f. $0.05/sf $ 4,125 209,959 s.f. 127,459 s.f. (1) 82,500 s.f. 0.05/sf 4,125 $ 8,250 E. LATERAL STORM SEWER AND STREET ® Lateral Front Assessable Storm Parcel Footage Credit Footage Sewer Street Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/FF Rate/FF Assessment SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 11325 0 1,325 $18.28(4) $16.88 $46,587 (2) Parcel 030-53 330 230 100 9.80 16.88 2,668 (2) Parcel 041-53 330 230 100 9.80 16.88 2,668 Parcel 050-53 335 235 (2) 100 9.80 16.88 2,668 WILLIAMS AND LARUE IST ADDITION .. Lot 4 280 75(3) 205 $ 9.80 $16.88 $ 5,469 ® NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 361 75(3) 286 $ 9.80 $33.75 $12,455 Page 17. 2848d '/-3 (1) Large lot credit policy. (2) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. (3) Corner lot credit. (4) Assessment rate equals lateral storm sewer cost divided by benefited drainage area converted to front foot assessment as follows: Project Cost Easterly Storm Sewer System = $ 71,990 12" Equivalent Trunk (JP -32A to east line Parcel 010-51) _ $-14,040 Project Cost Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer = $ 57,950 Benefited Drainage Area = 18.9 Ac. Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer Rate/acre = $3,066/Ac. Lateral Storm Sewer Assessment: Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro) = 7.9 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $24,221 Rate/F.F. _ $24,221 - 1,325 F.F.=.$18.28/F.F. Outlot A Lexington Square = 5.6 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $17,170 Rate/F.F. _ $17,170 - 1,055 F.F. _ $16.27/F.F. Page 18. 2848d W u Lateral Front Assessable Storm Parcel Footage Credit Footage Sewer Street Total Description (F.F.) (F.F.) (F.F.) Rate/FF Rate/FF Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A 11055 0 1,055 $16.27(4) $16.88 $34,973 Lot 18, Blk. 1 143 0 143 9.80 0.00 1,401 Lot 19, Blk. 1 97 0 97 9.80 0.00 951 lot 20, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 21, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 22, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 23, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 24, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 25, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 26, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 •735 Lot 27, Blk. 1 .79 0 79 9.80 0.00 774 Lot 28, Blk. 1 84 0 84 9.80 0.00 823 Lot 29, Blk. 1 85 0 85 9.80 0.00 833 Lot 30, Blk. 1 75 0 75 9.80 0.00 735 Lot 31, Blk. 1 113 0 113 9.80 0.00 1,107 $119,257 (1) Large lot credit policy. (2) Credit per Assessment Policy 86-3. (3) Corner lot credit. (4) Assessment rate equals lateral storm sewer cost divided by benefited drainage area converted to front foot assessment as follows: Project Cost Easterly Storm Sewer System = $ 71,990 12" Equivalent Trunk (JP -32A to east line Parcel 010-51) _ $-14,040 Project Cost Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer = $ 57,950 Benefited Drainage Area = 18.9 Ac. Easterly Lateral Storm Sewer Rate/acre = $3,066/Ac. Lateral Storm Sewer Assessment: Parcel 010-51 (Greensboro) = 7.9 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $24,221 Rate/F.F. _ $24,221 - 1,325 F.F.=.$18.28/F.F. Outlot A Lexington Square = 5.6 ac. x $3,066/ac. _ $17,170 Rate/F.F. _ $17,170 - 1,055 F.F. _ $16.27/F.F. Page 18. 2848d W u SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL WESCOTT ROAD PROSECT NO. 467 WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 2848d $ 974 Page 19. • Storm Sewer Sanitary Trunk Storm Sewer Total Sewer Later- Water Main Assessment Parcel al Benefit Lateral Bene- Trunk Service Description from Trunk fit from Trunk Area (Water) SW 1/4 SECTION 14 Parcel 010-51 $20,944 $ 7,873 $ 35,676 $3,374 (Greensboro) Parcel 030-53 1,188 1,190 1,200 Parcel 041-53 1,188 1,190 1,200 y� ( Parcel 050-53 1,188 1,190 1,200 WILLIAMS AND LARUE 1ST ADDITION Lot 4 NW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 016-25 2848d $ 974 Page 19. • Storm Sewer Lateral Trunk Storm Sewer Total Area 6 Street Assessment $ 46,587 $114,454 2,668 6,246 $4,125 2,668 10,371 4,125 2,668 10,371 $ 5,469 $ 5,469 $ 12,455 $ 13,429 Page 20. Sanitary Sewer Later- Water Main Storm Sewer Lateral Parcel al Benefit Lateral Bene- Trunk Service Trunk Storm Sewer Total Description from Trunk fit from Trunk Area (Water) Area 6 Street Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE Outlot A $12,528 $ 76,374 $1,687 $ 34,973 $125,562 Lot 18, Blk. 1 1,401 1,401 Lot 19, Blk. 1 951 951 Lot 20, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 21, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 22, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 23, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 24, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 25, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 26, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 27, Blk. 1 774 774 Lot 28, Blk. 1 823 823 Lot 29, Blk. 1 833 833 Lot 30, Blk. 1 735 735 Lot 31, Blk. 1 1,107 1,107 TOTAL $20,944 $24,939 $115,620 $8,660 $8,250 $119,257 $297,670 Page 20. WESCOTT ROAD SANITARY SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date: JAN., 1956 P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 O 1 N /�- �� Ul I f --1010 �5i'♦ < PVC i 04.1-53 050-53 I ---4 I YILL i 8° PVC PROPOSED 10°'PVC SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 1211 RCP SANITARY SEWER f OUTLOT A 0 200 4001 ®® LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT (; WESCOTT ROAD II SANITARY SEWER ASSESSEMENTS K l EAGAN, MINNESOTA ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / (� FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 PVC i PROPOSED 10°'PVC SANITARY SEWER EXISTING 1211 RCP SANITARY SEWER f OUTLOT A 0 200 4001 ®® LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT (; WESCOTT ROAD II SANITARY SEWER ASSESSEMENTS K l EAGAN, MINNESOTA ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / (� FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 •1 �I I 013 -Tb 111111 IRP 1111 1 092.33 4 'TER MAIN AR RE N RA. PROPOSED DLR Olb-23 WATER MAINN 5 K TT E C K RD \.1 a u u z /v AM NAH R OUTLOT A a p 206 900 J J v m VW—N� WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / FRONT FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 4 6 7 0 / Uf 1 I I 1 1 � I I I I _ 030.33 1 091-33 1 030-33 __ r I i I J (-- 1100' IDD' a 4 'TER MAIN AR RE N RA. PROPOSED DLR Olb-23 WATER MAINN 5 K TT E C K RD \.1 a u u z /v AM NAH R OUTLOT A a p 206 900 J J v m VW—N� WESCOTT ROAD WATER MAIN EAGAN, MINNESOTA LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK ASSESSMENT ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE / FRONT FOOT BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 4 6 7 (1)- ASSESSED FOR I ACRE PER ASSESSMENT POLICY 86-3 0 WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK AREA WATER ASSESSEMENT AREA BONESTROO, RO'SENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paid. Minn. EAGAN, MINNESOTA IDate: JAN., 1986 l� PROJ. NO. JapComm. 49381 J 467 •1 *'I POND JP -32 I` Y \ II 013-76w S ro` to /.< �`y •" �� ` 1___TJP-32A i J030-53 oal.ss 050-55 r--i-f Et IS - I (PROPOSED _J /--_~ �i 1 t pol-- --1--- 100 115'RCP 100 WESCOTT ROAD //100 0 I SEWER -_-�I--- `' ' IBRCP (BRC P. 21 R EXISTINYG" / / S RCP RR R RE K RD PROPOSED STORM SEWER / STORM SE'NER 016-25 EXISTING 49'RCP J STORM SEWERLI `I w P / J K TT E K RO TR TR a W Y g SA2 AR R m OUTLOT A I a o zco1 ® a 3 J 0 rc J yE m OANR RV I- TRAIL DIT -25 WESCOTT ROAD STORM SEWER EAGAN, MINNESOTA LATERAL STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT LATERAL BENEFIT RATE/ FRONT FOOT EQUIVALENT RATE/FRONT FOOT A 751 CORNER LOT CREDIT BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLII{ & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 P R O D. N O. Comm. 49381 4 67 NI M TRUNK STORM SEWER WESCOTT ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER ASS'ESSEMENT AREA EAGAN, MINNESOTA DIT) BONESTROO, ROSENE,.ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers Date: JAN., 1986 Jl Jj P R O J. NO. Comm. 49381 467 011-06 062-53 010-53 I 001-]] 050-53 OPOSED 18 CONC. I 5' CONCRE 8 G. F -F 1100 SIDEWALK k 100 8Ri R DIRE K I RLD. 8•BITUMINOUS TRAIL ffffl PROPOSED 6618 G K TTCURB BGUTTER Ill V /• OOTLOT 9 0 200 400 01)-25 WESCOTT ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA STREET ASSESSMENT FULL RESIDENTIAL RATE/FRONT FOOT 1/2 RESIDENTIAL RATE/FRONT FOOT A 751 CORNER LOT CREDIT 13ONESTROO, ROSENE, .ANDERLIi< & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date: JAN., 1986 PROD. NO. 115'3 Comm. 49381 467 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen TOLLEFSON BUILDERS/CONTRACTOR LICENSE SUSPENSION A. Tollefson Builders for Review and Consideration of Contractor's License Suspension --At the February 4, 1986 City Council meeting, a public hearing was scheduled to consider the vacation of a utility easement for Lot 5, Block 2, Brittany 7th Addition. As a result of public testimony, and discussion by City Council, action was taken by the City Council to temporarily deny any further building permits to Tollefson Builders Inc. and further to consider not renewing the builder's license if the findings of staff regarding prior and existing problems with the builder • substantiate this or other similar action. The contractor license was suspended until the March 4 City Council meeting to allow the City staff time to research other issues in addition to the utility easement that have resulted in noncompliance or noncon- formance by Tollefson Builders. At the March 4 City Council meeting memos of summary from both the Protective Inspections and Engineering Departments were presented for review and considera- tion. It was determined by the City Council that the contractor license suspension would continue until the March 19 meeting to provide more specific detail regarding the problems that are identified by staff summary. In addition, meetings be held with Tollefson Builders to review the various issues that are a matter of record. Meetings were held with representatives of Tollefson Builders on Friday, March 7 and Thursday, March 13 to discuss each of the issues in detail. For a copy of the information submitted •by the Public Works Department to Mr. Tollefson entitled "Tollefson Builders Inc., Unresolved Development Issues", refer to pages __6'5 through �pi� Within the Building Inspections Department all building p r� mits that were granted to Tollefson Builders during 1985 were reviewed and it appears there are two (2) building permits that have not been finaled and two (2) building, permits which were impacted by the sewer easement which are the homes for Mr. Skupas and Mr. Buckingham. For a copy of the list of permits granted to Tollefson Builders in the Brittany Addition refer to pages 3 through The Inspection Department will follow up on the two building permits which are not finalized, as a matter of record,and a report will be available at the meeting on Wednesday. All other building permits granted in other subdivisions including Briar Hill during 1985 are also being researched, however, there is no evidence that Tollefson has violated uniform building code requirements. of the City. 5� Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen During the week of March 10 through 14 it was learned that Tollefson Builders Inc. was operating a landfill northeast of Brittany Addition. The Dakota County Environmental Services Division and the City's Engineering Department are serving notice on Tollefson Builders regarding the violation. Enclosed on pages 75'tJ6 are copies of memos from Craig Knudsen, Engineering Technician. The City has received two (2) letters from property owners regarding problems they have experienced as homeowners in the Briar Hill and Brittany Additions res ectively. For a copy of that correspon- dence refer to pages through Y/ The memo is enclosed on page * that ex Tains uniform building code responsibility and also addresses the model home permit that was issued in the Brittany 7th Addition. In summary, the memorandums and fact findings indicate an ongoing problem the City is having with Tollefson Builders regarding conformance and compliance with various conditions that are set forth by the City Council with the approval of certain development projects. There have also been other problems such as on-site dumping in both Briar Hill and Brittany Additions, expiration of model home permits, homes started without building permits and other related issues as defined in the memos by the Director of Public Works and the Chief Building Inspector. The City Attorney's office has prepared a stipulation agreement which is suggested as course of action to require- Tollefson Builders to resolve all previous conditions set forth by the City Council in previous development agreements. The agreement also requires that Tollefson Builders meet all other City regulations before the City can terminate all work relating subdivision development, construction of residential homes or any other type of development relating to that project. The stipulation agreement is being revised by the City Attorney's office and will be presented to legal counsel for Carl Tollefson. A copy of the agreement with specific conditions will be distributed on Monday. ACTION TO BE. CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny any further suspension of building permits for Tollefson Builders andand further that a stipulation agreement be considered and approved with or without modification as presented. *This memo will be included with the Additional Information Packet which will be sent out on Monday, March 17. _5 Lrnt ' 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Movor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN .. JAMES A, SMITH VIC ELLISON ., March 19, 1986 THEODORE WACHTER Courcil Memi ers .. THOMAS HEDGES Cry P rninistrcfor - EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CARL TOLLEFSON City Clerk TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 RE: TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC ® UNRESOLVED DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Dear Mr. Tollefson: In response to the Council's directive of March 4, 1986, and our collective meeting on March 7, 1986, I have prepared the attached list of unresolved issues pertaining to subdivisions developed by your organization. You will note that the resolution of several of these items is currently in process but has not been completed. Also, other items will not be able to be specifically identified in further detail pertaining to individual locations until weather conditions permit a field inspection by our Engineering and/or Utility Maintenance personnel. Your assistance and cooperation in taking care of these items as soon as practical will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions pertaining to any of the information being forwarded to you, please contact me for further clarification. Sincerely, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Enclosure cc: ,.Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator THE, LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SUBDIVISION LOCATION 1. Briar Hill Lots 15, 29, 30, 31 & 32 4th Addn. of Block 1 2. Briar Hill Lots 15, 16, 27, 28, 29 4th Addn. & 30 of Block 1 3. Briar Hill Lots 19 & 20, Block 1 1st Addn. 4. Briar Hill Several Undefined Additions Addresses 5. Briar Hill Tot Lot 4th Addn. 6. Briar Hill W. Embankment of 3rd Addn. Dolomite Dr. 7. Brittany 5th NA Addn. 8. Brittany 5th Norwood Ct. 1st Addn. Addn. 5?; Revised 3/13/86 UNRESOLVED DEVELOPMENT ISSUES Encroachment in Public Easement Incompleted Trailway System and/or Insufficient Easement Dedication Insufficient Trailway Easement Dedication Final Water Stop Box & Sewer Cleanout Location, Adjustment & Repair Installation of Sod Improper, Unacceptable Restoration - Topsoil & Vegetation Required Expiration of Financial Guarantee Prior to Com- pletion of Requirements Failure to Provide Ade- quate Erosion Control Resulting in Damage to 1613 Norwood Dr. (Michael Frank) LOCATION UNRESOLVED DEVELOPMENT ISSUES J , 9. Brittany 6th, NA Outstanding Invoice #Is 7th, 8th & 9th 1707, 1899, 1900, 1901 Addns. 1902, 1903, 1933, 1934, 1955 10. Brittany 6th & Lot 7, Block 1 of a. Encroachment into 7th Additions Brittany 6th Addn., public easement. Lots 4 & 5, Block 2 b. Inadequate easement of Brittany 7th Addn. dedication for public utilities. c. Inaccurate placement of public utility. • d. Improper compaction of backfill material 11. Brittany 7th Sanitary Sewer Line Sewer Blockage (2/1/86) Addn. 12. Brittany 5th, 6th NA Lack of Application and/ 7th & 8th or Permit from PCA 13. Brittany 3rd Lot 7, Block 2 Possible Encroachment in Addn. Utility Easement •. 14. Briar Hill 4th Building 3 & 4 Site Drainage 15• Brittany 10th NA Illegal Garbage Dump Addn. 16. Brittany 7th Lot 7, Block 2 Special Assessment Addn. Bob Sprague Allocations J , 3030 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.0- BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 October -l2-,-1984 Carl TEYI Yefson-- , Tollefson Builders 1655 Norwood --Drive Eagan, MN 55122 BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH - - JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER REGISTERED MAIL Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Aaministrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clery RE: BRIAR HILL 1ST, 2ND AND. 3RD ADDITIONS - REPAIR BROKER SANITARY SEWER—CLEAN OUTS AND ADJUST ALL SANITARY SEWER CLEAN OUTS AND WATER.CURB STOP BOXES. TO 1" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. Dear Carl: This letter is to inform you that the City of Eagan will require you t—o_ repair__several broken sanitary sewer clean outs and adjust all sanitary sewer clean outs and water curb stop boxes to 1" below finished_slr-ade_within the above named subdivisions by October 26, 1984, or the City of Eagan will hire a plumbing contractor to perform the _.above_. mentioned work and you will be responsible for the cost involved plus a 15% overhead charge. Your cooperation and prompt attention to this matter will be greatly • appreciated. Sincerely, Edward J Kirscht Engineering Technician EJK:jbd cc: Richard Hefti Joe Connolly 6V THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL Mr. Carl Tollefson Tollefson Builders, Inc. ® 1655 Norwood Drive Eagan MN 55122 RE: BRIAR HILL 4TH ADDITION - BROKEN CLEAN OUT AT 3869 HEATHER DRIVE Dear Carl: BEA BLOMQUIST' Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER ._ Council Members THOMAS HEDGES " City Aaministrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk It has been brought to my attention that there is a broken sanitary sewer clean out at 3869 Heather Drive. This letter is to inform you that the City -of Eagan will require that you repair the above mentioned broken clean out by October 26, 1984, or the City of Eagan will hire a plumbing contractor to make. the necessary repairs and you will be responsible for the cost in- volved plus a 15% overhead charge. Your cooperation and PROMP ATTENTION to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, CA Edward , J. Kars Engineering Technician EJK:jbd cc: Richard M. Hefti, Assisstant City Engineer Joe Connolly THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 9� 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) d5d-8100 October 15, 1984 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 REGISTERED MAIL Re: Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Addition — Financial Guarantl Letter of Credit No. 16667 BEA.BLOM9UIST Moya THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Ca iMarWan THOMAS HEDGES CRY A6ni If a EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city Clete I have reviewed the progress concerning the work required in regard to the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions. Listed below is a list of items and the work which is required as per the development contracts for said Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions. Please note you have allowed Letter of Credit No. 14140 for the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions to lapse in violation of Item 10 of the development contract. The required financial guarantee amount ,required for the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Addition has been calculated in accordance with City policies and is to incorporate the following items. r 1) A. Restoration and boulevard sod or seed $2,000.00 B. Adjust and/or repair water curb stop boxes and sanitary sewer cleanouts 4,000.00 TOTAL 6,000.00 C. Contingencies (25% of Subtotal) 1,250.00 D. SUBTOTAL $7,500.00 The required financial guarantee amount required for the Briar Hill 4th Addition has been calculated in accordance with the development contract as listed below. ORIGINAL AMOUNT AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT REDUCED REMAINING 1) Street Identification $ 525.00 $ 525.00 0.00 Traffic Control Signs 2) Street Lights (2) 3,850.00 2,750.00 1,100.00 3) Tot Lot 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 4) Subdivision Monuments 500.00 500.00 0.00 5) Landscaping 2,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 6) A. Erosion Control 4,503.00 4,003.00 500.00 B. Grading (R/W only) 5,300.00 5,000.00 300.00 C. Restoration 19,335.00 17,335.00 2,000.00 �O ♦ THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY C. Contingencies a) Adjust and repair water curb stop boxes and ,I ' r r Carl Tollefson sanitary sewer cleanouts!: October 15, 1984 b) Construct Blacktop trail between Lots 30 & 32 of Page 2 Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addn. 8,000.00 D. ORIGINAL AMOUNT AMOUNT ITEM AMOUNT..,, REDUCED REMAINING 7) A.Lateral Service from Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions = $25,400.00 Trunk Water Main $15,727.28 $15,727.28 0.00 B.Subtotal $9,900.00 C. Contingencies a) Adjust and repair water curb stop boxes and sanitary sewer cleanouts!: b) Construct Blacktop trail between Lots 30 & 32 of Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addn. 8,000.00 D. SUBTOTAL 17,900.00 Line 1) D plus Line 7-D is the total amount of required financial guarantee for Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions = $25,400.00 Enclosed is a typed form to give the City of Eagan permission in writing to transfer $7,500.00 (the remaining work of the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions) to Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667 which is the existing Letter of Credit for the Briar Hill Fourth Addition. Upon the receipt of the signed written request to combine the remaining financial guarantee requirement of the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions with the Briar Hill 4th Addition and Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667, I will then proceed in reducing said Letter of Credit No. 16667 as indicated in this letter. Listed below are items which I am requesting your cooperation and prompt attention. Restoration of the boulevard area and drainage easement just west of Dolomite rr" Drive, north of Gold Trail, which needs to be graded, sodded or seeded in the y Ilk Briar Hill 3rd Addition. /✓e TPS „� per, .._ Sc E ,.� s" ,p 2) Repair the driveways where storm sewer was installed this past summer on Lots G�4 �• 13 and 14 of the Briar Hill 3rd Addition. r3) Adjust and/or repair sanitary sewer cleanouts and water curb stop boxes to 1" below finish grade in the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions. ti rB'g�4) Order Dakota Electric to install the last two luminaires on two street light 6 I poles on Willow Way. It appears that the Briar Hill 4th Addition is nearly 100% developed. As soon as the above -listed street lights are installed, I will transfer the energy costs to the property owners. "( ✓5) Construct the tot lot and, also, as soon as the tot lot is constructed, then action should be taken to vacate a portion of the tot lot easement which is I 41 not required. I have heard the home on Lot 15, Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition, del is encroaching on this easement. ,A) Construct the incompleted portion of the blacktop trail system between Lots wi 30 and 32 of Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition, which will complete the trail system. If you have any questions, please contact me at 454-8100. Sincerely, �Va��� Edwwa d JJ.lirscht Engineering Technician EJK/jj cc: Patricia Gnetz - 1st Bank Tom Colbert DATE TO: Edward Kirscht Engineering Technician City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan Mn 55122 RE: Transfer the Remaining Financial Guarantee Amount of,$7.,500.00 r For Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions To The Briar Hill Fourth Addition and Letter of Creidt No. 16667. Tollefson Builders and the First National Bank of St. Paul Hereby Grant the City of Eagan Permission' to Add the Proposed Financial Guarantee Revised Amount of $7,500.00 From Briar Hill 1st, 2nd and 3rd Additions to the Briar Hill 4th Addition Development Contract., and Letter of Credit No. 16667. Tollefson Builders Date The First National Bank Of St. Paul Date r 1 ®F 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL November 2, 1984 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Additions and Brittany 5th and 6th Additions - Incomplete Work BEA BLOM9UIST Mayw THOMAS.EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER Cg d Memb ' THOMAS HEDGES GIY Ad kvstrata EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk On November 1, 1984, I made a field inspection of the above -listed subdivisions listed below are itmes which were incomplete concerning work which the City will require to be completed as per the development contracts for said above - listed subdivisions. Would you please respond to this letter and give the City of Eagan a proposed date for completion of the below listed work. DATE REQUIRED ITEM SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION 1. Restoration Briar Hill 3rd Addn. Restoration of the boulevard 0a Ie�I J Secd e4 AREA was 6'J"f Srdlr Ani... -Ft dF a if are of +Fe ju.<aee, Was PLa;i d -('o Covxr area and part of the drainage a, easement just west of Dolomite Dr., north of ,Gold Tr., which needs some black dirt then D;�(- sodded or seeded with mulch. Some work was done recently. No black dirt was placed to cover the debris. Nothing was done just north of Gold Tr. where thereis a pile of dirt. No &Qa J4 K&bh(e 5/15/85 2. Restoration Briar Hill 3rd Addn. Repair the driveways and land- 1_1g_g scaping where storm sewer was Dome E 8 k' installed this past summer on 11/10/84 Lots 13 & 14, Block 1, of the Briar Hill 3rd Addn. 3. Restoration Briar Hill 1st, 2nd. Adjust and/or repair sanitary 3rd and 4th Addn. sewer cleanouts and water curb stop boxes to 1" below finish 11/10/84 grade in the Briar Hill 1st, 2nd, 3,rd and 4th Addns. 4. Street Lights Briar Hill 4th Addn. Order Dakota Electric to install po�a the last two luminaires on two street light poles on Willow Way. It appears that the Briar Hill 11/1'5/85 4th Addn. is nearly 100% developed. �3 THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY CARL TOLLEFSON NOVEMBER 2, 1984 PAGE 2 ITEM SUBDIVISION 4. ('Continued) 5. Tot Lot Briar Hill 4th Addn £hsE146ut IaF.s Nub � 4 ilaP�., Jac�.�td !nn u -a rt ;'cue i•z9-96 6. Trail System Briar Hill 4th Addn 7. Landscape Briar Hill 3rd & Screening 4th Addn. This wo $ Do,c .r 4kt ,4 13e R;-c,kt�IC fo t.l o g e S"r s 8. Erosion Problem Brittany 5th Addn. Claim o T aNE= �s -4-' iJ wG 4-:11sc✓ (P DATE REQUIRED REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION As soon as the above -listed street lights are installed, I will transfer the energy 11/15/85 costs to the property owners. Construct the tot lot and, also, as soon as the tot lot is constucted, then action should be taken to vacate a portion.o he tot lot ease - en n�ch is not require . I have heard the ,home on Lot 15, Block 1, Briar Hill 4th Addition, is encroaching on this easement. The existing easement shall be located in _ relation to the existing home on said Lot 15, Block 1. Construct the incompleted portion of the blacktop trail system between Lots 28 & 30 of Block 1, which will complete the trail system. The City will require a new easement for said trail. Vacate existing trail ease- ment between Lots 30 & 32 with request to Tom Colbert for City Council action. 6/1/85 L• a 146 +- ookt e, gr IL 6/1/85 Resolve the claim of Michael J. Frank of Lot 13, Block 2, Brittany 1st. Damage was done to his property due to erosion of mud and debris from the Brittany 5th Addn. 11/20/84 Complete the required land- ._ scape screening of residen- tial lots abutting the east 7- e'/C and southerly side of Briarl �Q C Hill 4th Addn. and the required landscape screening5/15/85 of residential lots abutt- ing the easterly side of Briar Hill 3rd Addn. Resolve the claim of Michael J. Frank of Lot 13, Block 2, Brittany 1st. Damage was done to his property due to erosion of mud and debris from the Brittany 5th Addn. 11/20/84 CARL TOLLEFSON NOVEMBER 2, 1984 PAGE 3 ITEM 9. As-Builts 10. Boulevard Restoration 11 DATE REQUIRE; SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENT FOR COMPLETION Brittany 5th & As-builts have not been fur - 6th Addn. nished as of this date. The City policy on receiving as- 11/16/84 builts is to have them for all projects by April 15, the year after the work is con- / structed. We should have received them no later than April 15, 1984. Brittany 5th & I sent a letter on 10-10-84, 6th Addn. requesting that you place soil and seed with mulch on the boulevards. You did not place any black dirt. I could not find any seed, and only placed 5/15/84 some hay on approximately " of the boulevard area instead of the 13' boulevard area. Chances are �. in-place hay bales will be destroyed ' _when the snow is plowed. 11. Clean up Brittany 5th Addn. There is mud on Sheffield Ct. which has not been cleaned up. 11/10/84 ?/z,/j r 12. Black Top Brittany 6th Addn. Complete the -paving of C?, 4 i?� Final Lift Sherwood Court. 11/15/84 Z r r/J9 4 The City is requesting that you respond in writing and enclose, a copy of this letter indicating a scheduled date for completion of the above-mentioned work. Your prompt attention to this matter will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Q` =4 � Edward J. Kirscht Engineering Technician EJK/jj cc: Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works Rich Hefti, Assistant City Engineer E ©F esu 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 JUNE 20, 1985 an CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Briar Hill 4th Addition Dear Mr. Tollefson: BEA BLOMQUIST Moyer THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER .. CO l'rCir Members THOMAS HEDGES City Adminsvator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Enclosed is a list of items needing attention in the Briar Hil� 4th Addition. These items must be completed to the City's satisfac tion in order to reduce the Financial Guarantee and, to issue building permits to the Brittany 8th Addition. 1) Construct the incomplete portion of the bike trail between Lots 28 and 30 of Black 1. Also attach the bike trail to the driveway on Block 1, Lot 16. 2) Sand must be placed in the tot lot except where the slope prevents the sand from staying in place. 3) Complete the required landscape screening of residential lots abutting the east and southerly side of Briar Hill 4th Addition as indicated on enclosed sheets. 4) An agreement must be reached between the Homeowner's Association and developer to lower the water stop boxes in Briar Hill 1st and 2nd Addiditons. Complaints due to this problem must be eliminated. 5) Easements to be obtained and vacated will be addressed in a letter to Tollefson Builders as soon as we, receive the correct information from Bill Dolan. sincerely, Craig E. Knudsen Engineering Technician CEK:jeh cc: Rich Hefti Ed Kirscht THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY ®F eacia 3&70 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 I BEA 8LOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Maya PHONE: (612) 45d-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS JULY 12, 1985 THEODORE WACHTER cmmi Mem TIMOTHY T HAMILTON THOMAS HEDGES CiN Atl nshalu THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST PAUL EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE 3.32 MINNESOTA STREET onaerk ST PAUL MN 55101 Re: Briar Hills 4th Addition - Release of Financial Guarantee y Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667 Dear Mr. Hamilton: Please be informed that the City of Eagan hereby authorizes the release of Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 16667 that was issued August 16, 1982 in the amount of $51,256.25. The release of the above listed Irrevocable Letter of Credit is due to the fact that Briar Hills 4th Addition is nearly complete. The following items will be guaranteed by means of a $10,000.00 escrow account between. Carl Tollefson and the City of Eagan. 1) Completion of a bike path on Block 1, Lot 16 of Briar Hills 4th Addition. 2) The lowering of water stop boxes. 3) Acquisition of an easement between Lots 28 & 30, 29 & 27, • Block 1, Briar Hills 4th Addition. 4) Building a bike path along the common lot lines of the property mentioned in item #3. 5) Insurance that the shrubs placed in Briar Hills 4th Addition will not die. 6) Sanitary sewer clean out to be lowered on Laurel Ct.. If you have any questions please contact me at 454-8100. S e :ely, g E!rKnu sen Engineering Technician cc: Rich Hefti Ed Kirscht Carl Tollefson THE LONE OAK TREE. - .THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 JULY 31, 1985 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS 1655 NORWOOD DRIVE EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Briar Hill 4th Addition Dear Mr. Toilefson: BEA BLOMQUIST Maw THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER -. Cmmc Members THOMAS HEDGES City AO Imft.1w EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Or, Clerk Enclosed is a list of the items which need to be finished in the Briar Hills Addition before the City can release the escrow account between Tollefson Builders and the City of Eagan. 1) Stop boxes need lowering at the following addresses on Laurel Court: 3828, 3826, 3830, 3832, 3838, 3840, 3839, 3823, 3805, 3811, 3813, 3806, 3810, 3818, 3820. 2) Sewer clean outs need to be lowered at 3833, 3817, 3816, Laurel Court. These stop boxes and sewer clean outs were items which should' have been resolved much earlier. When the Letter of Credit covering these items was released , it was understood that an additional Financial Guarantee would be placed toward Briar Hill 4th Addition to assure the completion of this project. Being that the additional Guarantee was never received and the work was never done, the City will not release any money until these items are finished. 3) Sod must be placed near the tot lot where timbers were removed. 4) Completion of a bike path on Block 1, Lot 16, of Briar Hills 4th Addition. - 5) Aquisition of an easement between Lots 28 and 30, 29 and 27, Block 1, Briar Hills 4th Addition. 6) Building a bike path along the common lot lines of the property mentioned in item #5. These items have been identified and brought to your attention 6� THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Briar Hill 4th Addition July 31, 1985 Page 2 several times. If these items are not completed by September 1, 1985, the City will hire a contractor to finish this job. All labor, materials, and City time will be charged against the escrow account set aside for these items. The remaining amount will be returned to Tollefson Builders. Si rely, /� 'u� - c Craig E. Knu sen Engineering Technician cc: Rich Hefti Ed Kirscht Ken Damlo CEK/jh of ecag an 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 - .. EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 October 23,1985 MR CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC 1655 NORWOOD DR EAGAN MN 55122 BEA BLOMQUIST MaYar THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH JERRY THOMAS THEODORE WACHTER . Corm Me ml THOMAS HEDGES City Aammnmto EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ON Clete Re: Contract 84-T, Brittany 7th Addition MPCA/MWCC Permit Application - Sanitary Sewer Extensions Dear Mr. Tollefson: The City of Eagan has been contacted by representatives of the MPCA Enforcement Section and put on notice of pending civil penalties associated with allowing sanitary sewer extensions without receiving the appropriate permits or approvals from the MPCA or MWCC. They have identified the above referenced subdivision as having the sanitary sewer extension' constructed, completed and put into use without even an application being made for a permit. As the developer for the above referenced subdivision, selecting to install these public. -improvements privately rather than through a City initiated contract, you assumed the respons bilities of insuring that all appropriate permits were acquire prior to commencement of construction. Our files do not reflect any correspondence or information that would indicate that an application had been sent to the MPCA and/or MWCC for the above referenced subdivision. I would appreci- ate it if you would research your files and provide the City with copies of any information (correspondence, application forms, etc.) that you may have that can show that the proper rules and regulations were adhered to. Due to the fact that the City of. Eagan is required to respond to the PCA pertaining to the allegation of these violations by October 31, 1965, it is imperative that you provide" me with this information no later than October 29, 1985. THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MPCA/MWCC PERMIT APPLICATIONS PAGE TWO OCTOBER 23, 1985 If it has been determined' that no application was submitted and no permit received for the work that you performed on the installa- --tion of public utilities' under private contract;- it is very likely that the City of Eagan will incur a substantial civil penalty from the MPGA. Should this fine be levied against the City of Eaaan, we will be expecting you to reimburse the City for all costs associated with any identifiable violations pertaining to the above referenced subdivision. Your prompt review and response to my attention by October 29, 1985, will be greatly appreciated. Sincerely, Nomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jbd cc; Paul Hauge, City Attorney Bill Dolan, Meadowood Inc. 71 ®F ecag an 3530 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 MARCH 3, 1986 CARL TOLLEFSON BRITTANYESTATES, INC TOLLEFSON BUILDERS, INC 12617 FAIRGREEN AVE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 REGISTERED MAIL Re: Brittany 5th Addition- Irrevocable Letter of Credit No Dear Mr. Tollefson: BEA BLOMQUIST MWor THOMAS EGAN .WMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members .., THOMAS HEDGES City Abmini:Votcr EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Or, Cies 1770 The City of Eagan has been notified by the First National Bank of St. Paul, by Registered Mail dated February 26, 1986, and it elects to cancel the above-mentioned Letter of Credit. Please be informed that a new Financial Guarantee must be secured for Brittany 5th Addition. The new Financial Guarantee must reach our office by April 4, 1986 and be in the amount of $5,000. If this is not submitted by April 4, 1986, the City will have to draw upon the existing Letter of Credit due to expire May 4, 1986. If you have any questions, please contact me 454-8100. Sincerely, e iiCa Craig E. Knudsen Engineering Technician cc • Thomas'..A:.C.,. _, Olbert, Director of Public Works Carolyn S. Dull, First Bank St. Paul Paul Hauge, City Attorney CEK:jh THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 0. 1985 BUILDING PEMMS ISSUED TO TOLLEFSON BUILDERS ADDRESS 8 LEGAL DATE ISSUED DATE FINALED 4843 SHEFFIELD LN, L 2, B 1, BRITTANY 5TH 1/85 4/85 1576 SHERWOOD WAY, L 4, B 2, BRITTANY 3RD 1/85 5/85 1582 SHERWOOD WAY, L 3, B 2, BRITTANY 3RD 1/85 4/85 1660 SHERWOOD WAY, L 5, B 1, BRITTANY 2ND 4/85 9/85 4862 WINDSOR CT, L 11, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 4/85 7/85 4869 WINDSOR CT., L 4, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 4/85 SEWER EASEMENT PROBLEMS 1539 SHERWOOD WAY, L 3, B 1, BRITTANY 7TH 5/85 9/85 ® 4860 SHEFFIELD LN, L 1, B 3, BRITTANY 3RD 6/85 10/85 4853 SHEFFIELD LN, L 7, B 1, BRITTANY 5TH 6/85 9/85 1575 SHERWOOD CT, L 9, B 1, BRITTANY 6TH 6/85 11/85 4839 SHEFFIELD LN, L 1, B 1, BRITTANY 5TH 6/85 9/85 1563 SHERWOOD CT, L 7, B 1, BRITTANY 6TH 7/85 NOT FINALED 4884 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 9, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 FOOTINGS ONLY 4879 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 7, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 11/85 4871 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 5, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 12/85 4872 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 12, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 7/85 12/85 ® 4856 WINDSOR CT, L 12, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 7/85 11/85 4876 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 11, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 8/85 12/85 4883 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 8, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 8/85 1/86 4874 WINDSOR CT, L 9, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 8/85 NOT FINALED 1543 SHERWOOD WAY, L 2, B 1, BRITTANY 7TH 8/85 11/85 1580 SHERWOOD CT, L 3, B 1, BRITTANY 6TH 8/85 11/85 4864 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 14, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 9/85 2/86 4875 WINDSOR CT, L 5, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 9/85 SEWER EASEMENT PROBLEMS 4868 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 13, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 10/85 2/86 1661 SHERWOOD WAY, L 2, B 2, BRITTANY 2ND 10/85 2/86 1528 SHERWOOD WAY, L 16, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 10/85 2/86 73 1985 BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED TO TOLLEFSON BUILDERS (CONTINUED) ADDRESS 6 LEGAL DATE ISSUED DATE FINALED 1529 SHERWOD WAY, L 2, B 1, BRITTANY STH 11/85 3/86 4875 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 6, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 11/85 NOT COMPLETE 4867 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 4, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 12/85 NOT COMPLETE 4857 KNOTTINGHAM CIR, L 2, B 2, BRITTANY 8TH 12/85 NOT COMPLETE 4868 WINDSOR CT, L 10, B 2, BRITTANY 7TH 12/85 NOT COMPLETE 2 • • MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: CRAIG E KNUDSEN, ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN DATE: MARCH 12, 1986 SUBJECT: TOLLEFSON BUILDERS INC DUMP SITE LOCATED NORTHEAST OF BRITTANY 8TH ADDITION In response to a report of an unauthorized dump site by Tollefson Builders, I was requested to accompany a Dakota County employee on an inspection of the site. Although Tollefson Builders have a grading permit for the proposed Brittany 9th Addition, the grading plan does not indicate a disposal site of any kind in or near this area. Further more, it is difficult to determine exactly where the property lines of Brittany 9th Addition are, and it is possible that portions of this site are not located on his property. This dump site was expected to contain building debris from the local Brittany Additions but, considering the size, it could very easily contain debris from building sites outside of the City of Eagan. The contents of debris went beyond typical building material to include tires, empty containers, cans, glass and various types of household garbage. At the time of our inspection, it looked like Tollefson employees were attempting to bury this site, but were unable to complete the job due to the equipment getting stuck. The County has not determined what type of action will be taken at this time, but will keep us updated on this issue and copy the City ® on all correspondence. CK/jj cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works 75 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 CERTIFIED MAIL March 14, 1986 CARL TOLLEFSON TOLLEFSON BUILDERS 12617 FAIRGREEN AVENUE APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 BEA BLOMQUIST Mi THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH MIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER COun ll Members THOMAS HEDGES City Adminisrramr EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clerk Re: Dump Site North of Brittany 8th & Brittany 9th Additions CEASE AND DESIST ORDER Dear Mr. Tollefson: On March 11, 1986, I was requested to accompany Dakota County on an inspection of a dump site in the above-mentioned area. During this inspection, we found Tollefson Builders to be in violation of several City Ordinances. The City of Eagan hereby orders you to CEASE AND DESIST all grading and dumping of all unauthorized material in this area. Continued dumping will be in further violation and subject to penalty as prescribed by City Ordinances. You will also be required to clean up and restore this area to its previous condition. If you have any questions regarding this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Z cerely-�� Craig E. Knudsen Engineering Technician CEK/jj cc: Thomas L .Hedges; ity Administrator Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Paul Hauge, City Attorney JoEllen Fredlund, Environmental Health Specialist All THE LONE OAK TREE. - . THE SYMBOL OA STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY t'u s� b 21933 �° 006(tiL Po_mrOUnEOs -AsS Hej SSIZZ m4 zcH SC')_(o� 7 ssl22 _ This _is �.�^e��_SV�c�� �nc1�:c9-__5urmmau�_ �rob.lam,�S_ ►�(���-� Tl 3�n_Idrs__v�utihi-lL_ASS,au ueaP—rn- m_i . • 0 WL lew (aw _ _o'--vt l7 (at(Gtiv -- -----z �220._� a-- - -QyteG.�. uWeQvP�Onea,�q_ -l C&3UPA5Z 1-1e�"V\tAf Yq�NPCp,U L 6>0 , ..— - LEA _rojl(�_ I I e I __�,_k L RE IL ��/ �75--To--laAdsc# #.230 SZWe4 _QL 0 dy Ply 11 14E6-rHt7z__— hi'1 _beizv� 3YX Wks- dL IOU! l -Agwl 0- • mvjlie --- --- ----- - - , os -- - P, 1' Mr. & Mrs. Donald M 1623 Norwood Drive Eagan, MN 55122 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City of Eagan City Hall Eagan, MN. 55.121 Dear Mr. Hedges: February 28, 1986 Gullett City Administrator This letter is in reference to our home at 1623 Norwood Drive, Eagan, a Tollefson Home in Brittany Estates. I am writing this letter to inform you of my recent dissatisfation with Carl Tollefson's work. In September, 1985 our kitchen floor in front of the sliding glass door on the north side caved in. I contacted Carl's dffice to see if they could tell me what happened. They sent down a worker to look at it in October. He said it could be several things that happenedy i.e. a vent originally cut out and moved and never closed properly, or water could have got in and caused the subfloor to rot. He said Carl would probably say "water got in and caused it to rot" without even seeing it. John from Bernco Corp. told us the first year we were in the.house that we had a problem with the installation of the door because it would not open and close properly. He measured a gap in the door to be almost 3/4 inch difference at the bottom from the top. This gap caused frost to build up in the winter and cold air to blow through. I contacted the Attorney General's office and talked to Joan. She said there was a state statute which protected new homeowners against such problems for ten years. She said I should contact the City Building Inspector, which I did. I finally got in touch with Mr. Dale Peterson to see what kind of recourse I had. He was sympathetic but knew of no action he could take. Why should I be responsible for fixing a problem that was never done right to begin with. I believe Carl Tollefson is responsible for reinstallation of the door, repairing the subfloor, and whatever else is involved to correct this problem. I was told that Carl would not fix this "problem" as he was "too busy" with all his new construction and it may take up to two years to get handled, if at all. I was also told Carl may not fit it at all but just say "sue me". I was never able to personally talk to Carl, just given the run around by his office. 'W r 1 U • Feb. 28, 1986 Page 2 I would like to see this "major" problem fixed by Tollefson this time as I have corrected enough of his mistakes in the past at my expense. Two other problems involving the exterior paint on the front of my house and our driveway were never corrected properly. I finally gave up. Please give your attention to this letter. I pay high taxes on my home but the quality of work does not make it worth as much as I am assessed. I was the first house to close in Brittany and was told I got the cheap subcontractors at the time. Thank you for any help and cooperation you can give me. rSincerely, 0 "J6) Donald and Sharron Cullett MJV Agenda Information Memo March 19, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page E'igh'teen SPECIAL PERMIT/NURSERY SCHOOL B. Special Permit to Allow a Nursery School for No More Than 10 Students Located at 1658 Woodgate Lane --An application was submitted to the Planning Department requesting a special permit to allow a ten -student nursery school in an R-1, Single -Family district. At the last City Council meeting this item was continued to allow for submission of a petition by the adjacent neighbors. There are four (4') property owners who have signed the petition that did not object, while one person has indicated an objection. For a copy of the report and a petition, refer to pages o13 through 9115- ACTION 1 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the special permit application as presented. • P SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL PERMIT BURTON & MAYONE EPPEN BLOCK 1, LOT 12, ADDITION R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) MARCH 4, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 . REPORTED BY: JIM STURM MALLARD PARK 2ND APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a special permit to allow a 10 student nursery school in an R-1 single family district. COMMENTS: The applicants currently have 10 students enrolled in their nursery school at 2057 Garnet La and have been doing so for 10 years.. Day. care facilities in R-1 districts require ' Special Use _Permits for 7 - 10 children and Conditional Use Permits for 11 plus children. The nursery school is somewhat different than the traditional day care facility in that there are 2 sessions as opposed to the all day service. The Eppen's plan on moving to the Mallard Park Addition in the near future and do not plan on expanding the nursery school in size. If approved, the.special permit shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. ROBE CONSULTINO ENOINElflS ENGINEERING PLANNERS and LAND ,URVETORS COMPRNY INC. OK 32/Ft2j', 1000 EAST 1461h STREET. eURNSVILLE, MINNESOTA 5533T PM 432'3000 Cer-Wi ctzi Sur -tee y i4o41—s�r�et=ort LOT 12, BLOCK // MALLARD PARK 21JD ADD17 DAKOTA COUMTY, MINNESOTA he \ 4% NORTH SCALE 1"P jO 9� yti� SS. Da 30' FROUT' SU/LD/Al6 / \, � , Z % SETBACK LIA/E // /\ \`O !�/ _N 79 '99 / 0 ,y / s;'N p / ••'; �q� `9` 230 30.35 Ae- •�'� 0�\MO /•10.0 J fRAINg4E AND / rS Da• OD � 'i, l;q�l/J• ITILITY EASEMENT Y r9 �•N% 1e Oab/• ,/ O J�: �• J J 'A' 1 %wr 5lu /mJ ^� < LOT I2 ' N I / v' DENOTES EYISTIN6 ELEVAT/ON 959.7) DENOTES 9ROA7SSO ELEVAT/DA/ S (9.37.e) L /S- - INDICATES DIRECTION OF IQ3i9: •y _// (977.7) SURFACE DRAINA6E 40 � N 8a.2o, 36 939.95 r FiN/SHED &W,96E FLOOR ELEVA W I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct representation of a tract .of land as shown'and described hereon.. As prepared by me on this 3o day of OC TORE P. 985% u,_% Minn. nag. No.leaF O % /,/ v 0 a -7 -Le -(I �e-U-11, ty. _�--t-•� r� 61 ' 65 U Agenda Information Memo March 19, 196'6, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen STREET NAME DESIGNATZON C. Street Name Designation, I -35E & Deerwood Drive Frontage Road --On January 7 and March 4, the City Council continued consideration of a request from Mr. Leo Murphy to rename the I - 35E Frontage Road north of Deerwood Drive to "Murphy Street". Comments received from•the only other affected property owner, Mr. Ed Dunn, indicated a preference for "Murphy Parkway". This item has been continued to receive comments from the Advisory, Planning, Park & Recreation Commissions, the most recent review being March 6. While the Park & Recreation Naming Subcommittee submitted the most names for consideration, there was no real strong support for any particular name for Council's consideration. The following is a final list of names from all suggestions submitted: Murphy Street, Murphy Parkway, Long 'Lake Lane, Cronkin Lane, and Deerwood Lane. The Public Works Director will be background pertaining to each of at the March 19 meeting. available to provide additional the above -referenced suggestions ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the street name designation for I -35E Frontage Road north of Deerwood Drive. Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty GUN CLUB LAKE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS D. Appointments to Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Commission -- At the last regular City Council meeting held on March 4, 1986, all three (3) Gun Club Lake Watershed Management appointments that were made at the February 18, 1986, City Council meeting were rescinded by City Council action. Since the March 4, City Council meeting., City Councilmember Egan is recommending Richard Ney, who resides at 4497 Oak Chase Lane, City Councilmember Smith is recommending Wes Lane who resides at the Carriage Hills condominium complex, City Councilmember Wachter has expressed a personal interest in serving a member of the Commission and an application was received from Scott Merkley, who resides at 4389 aSunrise Drive. A copy of that letter is enclosed on page 0g for your reference- Also, Director of Public Works Colbert would continue to be a candidate for appointment to the Commission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the appointment of three (3) residents to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management organization. Z March 11, 1986 THOMAS L HEDGES CITY ADMINISTRATOR CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN MN 55122 Re: Gun Club Lake Watershed Manaaement Organization Dear Mr. Hedges: ®It my understanding that the City Council is currently going through the process of reviewing applications for appointment.to the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization. I would like to express my interest in being considered for such an appointment. I feel my past work experience with the Engineering Division of the City of Eagan and my previous appointment as an Alternate to the Planning Commission would qualify me for serious consideration for the technical knowledge and community involvement, which I am sure would be prerequisites for an appointment. Also, I am very interested in the preservation and management of our natural water resources, especially as it might affect the City of Eagan. Although I am no longer employed by the City of Eagan, I currently reside in the City and have every intention and desire of becoming an integral part of this community through my recent purchase of a • permanent residence. I hope that you and the City Council will give serious consideration to my application and will provide me with the opportunity to provide a service for our community. I will anxiously await your response or request for additional information as may be necessary. Sincerely, Scott Merkley EiJT 4389 Sunrise Drive Eagan MN 55122 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One PRELIMSNARY PLAT & REZONING/EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION A. Preliminary Plat for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition for Six Lots on Approximately 23 Acres and a Rezoning from NB, GB & R-4 to Commercial Planned Development --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on February 25, 1986, to consider two (2) applications presented by the Opus Corporation. The first application was a rezoning from NB, GB & R-4 to a commercial planned development while the second application consists' of a preliminary plat • entitled Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the application with the following additions to the Planning Department report: 1. Planned Development be for a five-year period. 2. Each of the commercial lots be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Landscaping be included for the Residence Inn and the overall planned development. For additional information on this proposed development, refer to the Planning and Engineer ng Department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages90 through /. tThe Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission met at its March 6 meeting and is recommending: . 1) A cash dedication be required for the platted lots consistent with the City's policy and 2) that the developer provide a 7'5-foot—wide trail easement along LeMay Lake to provide for a potential future trail. For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission on this item, refer to pages 103 through /D % ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON 'THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning and 2) the preliminary plat for Eagandale LeMay Lake 2nd Addition. i0 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION (RESIDENCE INN) LOCATION: PART OF THE NWq, SECTION 10 EXISTING ZONING: NB (NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS, GB (GENERAL BUSINESS) '& R-4 (RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 20, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The first application is a request to rezone from NB (neighborhood business), GB (general business) & R-4 '(residential multiple) to a commercial planned development • which would include some neighborhood business uses - restaurants, retail sales and gasoline service facilities. LB (limited business) use for a 72,000 S.F. office facility and RB (roadside business) which would allow 120 room hotel - Residence Inn. This entire commercial planned development would consist of approx. 20.5 acres. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this 20 acre parcel as an LB (limited business) site and some of the uses fit the LB category, however, most uses are proposed asa higher intensity use than an LB. Some of the commercial/retail uses are in conformance with the existing zoning on the property. One of the major differences is that the southerly triangle of the property is presently zoned R-4 (residential multiple) and the proposed office building would be. consistent with the Comp. Guide designation of LB. The majority of the retail is of a higher intensity than the LB (limited business) district. - The -one use that does not fit the zoning or the Comp.. Guide would be the 120 room Residence Inn Hotel facility. It has been integrat- ed into the overall commercial plan through the planned development process. SITE PLAN: The property is bordered by Lone Oak Rd on the north, 35-E on the east, LeMay Lake Apartments on the west & LeMay Lake to the south. The Opus Corp. submitted an overall sketch plan _ as to how they foresee this parcel developing with the detailed development plan of LeMay Lake to the west. It was decided that only one access would be used to service both the multiple project and the proposed commercial project on the east. . This 20 acre parcel would have access provided by a loop street where six lots would be created for six _ specific uses. These uses are . as follows: 1. A service station facility of approx. 3,000 S.F. 2. Retail strip commercial facility approx. 22,000 3. Three restaurant facilities ranging from 10,000 S.F. to 4,000 S.F. both being the sit down & fast food category. qo OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD FEBRUARY 25, 1986 PAGE 2 4. A Residence Inn containing approx. 120 rooms. 4.4 acres and having 5. An office building of four floors and 72,000 S.F. The applicant is proposing to plat 6 individual lots of which the major emphasis will be on the lot containing the Residence Inn. The detailed site plan, lot 1, block 1, will consist of 4.4 acres and contain a 120 room Residence Inn with lot coverage 21.6%. The ,Residence Inn facility is an extended stay hotel of which the average length of stay would be seven days. The site plan consists of 16 buildings, 15 eight-plex units and one gate house which contains approx. 3,000 S.F. for a common office meeting area to be used by the residents. The gate house will have a full basement for storage and laundry facilities available for the residents use. The buildings are clustered around an interior courtyard effect with general parking and circulation on the outside around the perimeter of the lot area. As mentioned ,earlier, each unit will be a suite. One out of every four will be a penthouse suite which would contain two bedrooms, two bathrooms, cooking facilities and a fireplace. It is staff's understanding that all units will contain fireplaces and all units will have full,cooking facilities. The required parking for the 120 unit hotel would be 135 parking spaces. The applicants are proposing 144, approx. 9 above City Code requirements. There will be a 20' green area from the interior loop roadway with 3 accesses onto Eagandale Place. Good circulation for this facility has been provided. They are providing a common court walk area with an outdoor swimming pool and hot tub facility. The buildings are proposed to be two story, gabled roof with • each unit having an exterior entrance from the courtyard area., The setbacks between buildings are approx. 10' to allow pedestrian movement. This setback between buildings is being reviewed by, the Bldg. Dept. so that setbacks for fire protection are met. The applicants will ,be present at the Feb. 25th meeting with a slide presentation to better inform the APC on the concept of the Residence Inn. At the present time, the major emphasis of this proposed development is placed on the Residence Inn. The other 5 lots are set up to be platted as lots, however, the detailed site plans will be reviewed prior. to any of the building permits being issued. The applicants have indicated that as a condition of this plat, the site plans could be reviewed by the APC and City Council prior to permits. Consequently, no detailed review has been done on the remaining lots with the exception that when lot 4 is platted, it should be split into two in order to accomodate the two buildings proposed. ^� OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD PAGE 3 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant graded most of this site using excess material generated from the I-35E_construction in 1983 and 1984. The proposed grading plan is basically a refinement on the existing site grades to accommodate more specific uses as proposed by the applicant. The preliminary grading plan the applicant submitted appears to meet all City codes for grading. This area is located within Major Drainage District D as shown on Figure 1. The site development grading on this site will require construction of storm sewer throughout the site to handle parking lot drainage and street drainage: Under City Contract 85-7, the City installed a 54" storm sewer line down Eagandale Place to provide adequate capacity for upstream areas and this site. This ® new line is suited to handle the flow from this proposed development site. The City will not have to construct any new trunk storm sewer as a result of this development going in. UTILITIES: Also under City Contract 85-7, the City installed water main and sanitary sewer within Eagandale Place. If the City approves this project, then the water main and sanitary sewer can easily be extended into this site to provide necessary service for this area. Staff would like to see the water main from Eagandale Place extended easterly to connect to an existing 12" water main located near the northeast corner of this proposed development as a condition of approval. This connection would benefit this area by improving water flow characteristics. ® STREETS: Eagandale Place is an existing City street built to its ultimate design which provides access to this proposed development. The City also constructed this street under Contract 85-7. It will be this development's responsibility to remove the existing turn -around on Eagandale Place and extend the street in a circular fashion to loop back onto itself as shown on the proposed submittal drawings. Staff recommends this roadway width be 36' wide with no parking on either side. Staff recommends that driveways on the internal street for future developments meet the following criteria: 1. Where possible, driveways opposite each other shall line up. 2. A 75' offset will be required for driveways which cannot be made to line up. 3. There shall be.a minimum of a 100' separation between driveway center lines on the same side of the street. OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD PAGE 4 PERMITS: The applicant for this development will be responsible for obtaining the following permits or approvals if the applicant chooses to install public utilities under a private contract: 1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC sanitary sewer extension approval. 3. Mn. Dept. of Health water main extension approval. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The 60' right-of-way the applicant is proposing to dedicate for Eagandale Place presents no problems for staff because they are dedicating an additional 20' drainage and utility easement adjacent to the public right-of-way. In addition to the easements required by code, this development will be responsible for dedicating a 20' easement over the water main segment looping to the northeast of this site, which is not located within City right-of-way. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the City's assessment records, portions of Parcels 010-01 and 020-26 and all of Parcels 030-26 and 010-04 were assessed at the multiple rate for trunk area water assessments in 1976 for Improvement #179. Staff proposes that this development be responsible for the upgrading of the trunk water assessment from multiple family to commercial/industrial over the portion of Parcel 020-26 that was assessed at the multiple rate and also over the entire portion of 030-26 and 010-04, which were also assessed at the multiple rate. The following table summarizes the amounts based on 1986 rates. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd 1.986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Water Area Upgrading 010-04 0.14 Ac $1,830/Ac (1) $ 256 020-26 3.44 Ac 1,830/Ac (1) 6,295 030-26 5.43 Ac 1,830/Ac (1) 9,937 ` TOTAL $16,488 (')Commercial/Industrial Rate - Multiple Rate q3 40 o • • OPUS CORP EAGANDALE LE MAY LAKE 2ND ADD PAGE 5 Staff feels that Parcel 010-01 has fulfilled its obligations regarding trunk area storm sewer. Staff's reasoning is because the original parcel contained 20 acres with 17.6 acres being assessed at the commercial/industrial rate and the remaining 2.4 acres being assessed at the multiple rate. It would be extremely difficult to determine where the multiple rate was assessed in relation to the residue left after the I -35E taking. Because of the small area (1.92 Acres net) assessed at the multiple rate, staff feels the remaining parcel of 010-01 has fulfilled its obligation for trunk area water main assessments. This development will be responsible for all costs associated with the construction of internal utilities and streets. 1 CONDITIONS: 1. A Planned Development Agreement be entered into & the concept plan for the six (6) lots be the exhibit to be followed for the Planned Development. 2. This development is impacted by the Shoreline Zoning Ordinance and shall be reviewed by the Dept, of Natural Resources for their comments prior to final plat approval. 3. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail access and park dedication. 4. A determination shall be made as to whether a Comp. Plan amendment would be required for this development proposal. 5, Any Conditional Use Permits such as 4 story buildings, pylon signs or drive-thru facilities shall be made with separate • applications, 6. An overall architectural theme shall be established and control- led signage should be.taken for this total development. 7. All plat conditions shall be adhered to, 8. This development will be responsible for complying with all applicable general engineering conditions. 9. This development will be responsible for looping the water main within Eagandale Place to the existing water main at the northeast corner of this development. 10. This development shall dedicate a 60' right-of-way for Eagandale Place. 11. A 20' drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent • all public right-of-way. 12. A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated over the water main not located within City right-of-way.. 13. All driveways which cannot be made to line up shall be offset a minimum of 75' and there shall be a minimum of 100' separation between driveways. 14. No driveway shall be constructed closer than 100' to the curb line extension of the street intersection. 15. This development will be responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals and permits if utilities are constructed under private contract. „ 16. This development shall be responsible for the trunk water area upgrading assessment at the rates in effect at the , time of final platting. 17. This development shall be responsible for the costs of all internal streets and utilities. C�tJ' mn Sw CWNIFI taus \ t[xuox � \NCOXp�N^,NEC Idl, 4.2 �ot�tnal,� I�aY ►� 2� P�nr(t� PD 74-7 RB A /. OY. •• ', � N tJ8 � R-4 A PD A CE N I Ffi iNDJ>?. r !i•.l_ FA RK i •iiel q q.=. A. � (� i I LIA ITT =.. � _ — CD r„ injigat1` i�•I cq �= F\ ' !-t it �--------- Hit'; IT ________tITlit i � 11';:1:1 = ; e ---i r• � 1 _'7 (-� �'G.. V ; � _/ —.e 11:11 11 111M mi i _i' If . •yir "1 i � � ! � . r :i11 I u 1 �• i .::!ta ! \',SII �� i ,) ���� i i LII e• .r „� .. m G) D Z D r m Lemay Lake [EAMMURIE COMER LEMAY LAKE DEVELOPMENT ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN - IOPUS CORPORATION a N 0 100 goo 300 A. NORTH 'Aw INC JAX 00. 1110 ro0 TNIRO eTARIT eOM , YIXXeAOOIIR ax 0]1.0100 I�1 R. wo, I Eagandele Blvd. - -- Smmlee 81et10A 2,000 S0. FL .0 Acres I t Ree ewe Ol 10,000 S0. FL 2.5 Aero j Retell 22,000 Sp. FL 2.4 Awe im N 15JANUARY 1966 RESIDENCE INN _Y EAGAN, MINNESOTA AN1(OPSUNSKY KRANK E%PICKSON -_ .......... . �..� �. ARCHITECTS RCNECKS C. • SITE PLAN RESIDENCE INN EAGAN, MINNESOTA 0 SITE LOCATION .1_ •, I IT A V"21 '-)a Y) j -N 3w;53wd Z+ 31`d �1NyytjtJ i. - z . .. ........ Z V- /i '1 / LLI / 1 ilk It ! rLY Ld CO CA I is tit ilk It ! Ld m m •1 p� FIG. +1 city of eagan -" a standard - STORM SEWER approved-: plate #: 0 PUBLIC _ WORKS DEPARTMENJ MASTER PLAN • • SUITE RUILDING (COVERED. ST AIRS) ii- GROUND FLOOR PLAN ..STUDIO SUITE BUIL®INC APC Minutes February 25, 1986 1. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted to bring the area into compliance with City Code. Screening should be encouraged to lessen the impact of these two tanks: All voted aye. EAGANDALE LeMAY LAKE 2nd ADDITION - REZONING & PRELIMINARY PLAT The public hearing for the preliminary plat and rezoning of 20.5 acres in part of the northwest quarter of Section 10 from NB (Neighborhood Business), GB (General Business) and R-4 (Residential Multiple) to Commercial Planned Development with a preliminary plat consisting of 6 lots including a 120 -room hotel by Residence Inn on a 4.36 acre lot, was convened by Vice Chairman Harrison. City Planner Dale Runkle made a brief introduction of the proposals. Mr. Bob Worthington of Opus described the development, indicating that a request for planned development was being made with all future phases, other than the hotel, subject to review by the Planning Commission and City Council. Mr. John Meyer of Residence Inn, Inc. and Greg Hollankamp of K. K. & E., Inc., architects, were also present to describe the specific plans for the Residence Inn facility. Questions were raised in regard to traffic and potential use of LeMay Lake. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of the entire parcel to planned development with a five-year completion period, subject to the following conditions: 1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be entered into and the concept plan for the six (6) lots shall be the exhibit to be followed for the Planned Development. _ 2. This development is impacted by the Shoreline Zoning Ordinance and shall be reviewed by the Dept. of Natural Resources for their comments prior to final plat approval. 3. The plat shall be subject to the ParkCommission's review for trail access and park dedication. 4. A determination shall be made as to whether a Comp. Plan amendment would be required for this development proposal. 5. Any conditional use permits such as 4 story buildings, pylon signs or drive-thru facilities shall be made with separate applications. 6. An overall architectural theme shall be established and controlled signage should be taken for this total development. 7. This development shall be responsible for looping the water main within Eagandale Place to the existing water main at the northeast corner of this development. 8. This development shall dedicate a 60 foot right-of-way for Eagandale Place. /Q_�5 2 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 9. A 20 foot arainagw and utility easement, shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way. 10. A 20 foot utility easement shall be aedicatea over the water main not located within City right-of-way. 11. All driveways which cannot be made to line up shall be offset a minimum of 75 feet and there shall be a minimum of 100 feet separation between driveways. 12.. No driveway shall be constructed closer than 100 feet to the curb Line extension of the street intersection. 13. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals and permits if utilities are constructed unaer private contract. ® 14. This development shall be responsible for the trunk water area upgrading assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 15. This development shall be responsible for the costs of all internal streets and utilities. All voted yes. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A Planned Development Agreement shall be enterea into and the concept plan for the six (6) lots shall be the exhibit to be followed for the Planned Development. 2. This development is impacted by the Shoreline Zoning ordinance and shall be reviewed by the Dept. of Natural Resources for their comments prior to final plat approval. 3. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail access and park dedication. 4. Any Conditional Use Permits such as 4 story buildings, pylon signs or drive-thru facilities shall be made with separate applications. 5. All plat conditions shall be adhered to. 6. This development will be responsible for complying with all applicable general engineering ana planning conditions. 7. A 20 foot.drainage and utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to all public right-of-way. B. A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated over the water main not located within City right-of-way. 3 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 9. All driveways which cannot be made to line up shall be offset a minimum of 75 feet and there shall be a minimum of 100 feet separation between driveways. 10. No driveway shall be constructed closer than 100 feet to the curb line extension of the street intersection. 11. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary approvals and permits if utilities are constructed under private contract. 12. This development shall be responsible for the trunk water area upgrading assessment at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 13. This development shall be responsible for the costs of all internal streets and utilities. 14. An approved landscaping plan with adequate bond valid for a period of • at least one year or one growing season, whichever is later, shall be required. All members voted in favor. LEXINGTON PLACE SOUTH 3RD ADDITION — PRELIMINARY PLAT The vice chairman then commenced the public hearing forthe application of Frontier Midwest for a preliminary plat of Lexington Place South 3rd -Addition in the southwest quarter of Section 14, consisting of 10 single family lots in the Lexington South Planned Development north of_Wescott Road, and east of Lexington Avenue. Dale Runkle provided a brief history of the planned development and advised that the lots were 10,000 to 12,000 square feet, which was larger than the surrounding lots. It was also indicated that the Park Commission had not reviewed the proposed preliminary plat. Mr. Mark Parranto was present on behalf of Frontier Midwest as were owners of existing Orrin Thompson lots and homes bordering the proposed preliminary plat. Discussion centered around the proper use of the parcel, which had been designated as proposed private open space, to be controlled by a homeowners association which was never formed by Orrin Thompson. Mr. Parranto indicated that originally Orrin Thompson had plans for a community area with association controlled facilities such as swimming pool and/or tennis courts which had been abandoned as part of their normal development. Frontier Midwest had acquired the property as part of a larger parcel from Orrin Thompson. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the matter to the next regular meeting with the following directives: 1. Staff and/or legal counsel shall provide an opinion as to the legality of changing the anticipated use in the PUD and the impact of possible tax forfeiture. 2. Verification as to whether the area is a drainage area. 3. A review of the proposal by the Parks and Recreation Department. All voted affirmatively. 1,974 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two PRELIMINARY PLAT& REZONING/PARK KNOLL ADDITION B. Preliminary Plat for Park Knoll Addition and Rezoning from R-2' to R-1 on Outlot B, Oakwood Heights Addition --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on Tuesday, February 5, to consider a rezoning application of 6.6 acres from R-2 to R-1 and a preliminary plat for 15 lots referenced as Park Knoll Addition in the area commonly known as the Oakwood Heights Addition. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the rezoning and the preliminary plat subject to the staff report, noting that the condition regarding storm sewer be addressed with a satisfactory solution can be resolved on this issue. It was also recommended by the Planning Commission that the area between the townhouse development and single-family lots be graded, restored and landscaped to a suitable plan. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning a/n0dq�' Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages /�j�/ through - �— It was recommended by the Parks & Recreation Commission that the Park Knoll Addition is a part of the Lexington South PUD which has previously completed its parkland dedication requirements. The Commission did, however, recommend the developer be responsible for the placement of an 8 -foot, bituminous trailway on Wilderness Run Road. For additional information regarding action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission on this item, refer to page(s) ZZO• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED .ON THIS ITEM: To approve .or deny 1) the rezoning from R-2 PD to R-1., and 2) a preliminary plat for 15 single-family lots., /Q O CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING PARK KNOLL ADDITION APPLICANT: TRI -LAND PROPERTIES, INC LOCATION: SE4, SECTION 26 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (LEXINGTON SOUTH) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 14, 1986 . REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING • APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted request- ing 1) a rezoning of 6.6 acres from R-2 (double) to R-1 (single family) and 2) a preliminary plat for 15 lots in the area known as the Oakwood Heights Addition. ZONING & LAND USE This site is located north of Wilderness Run Rd and is bounded by Trapp Farm Park to the east, the Highline Trail to the north and west and the Oakwood Heights Addition also to the west. The 15 lots will give the Park Knoll Addition a density of 2.2 units per acre. The existing zoning would have allowed for 39 units at 6 units per acre. All lots meet or exceed the 12,000 S. F. code requirement and some along the Highline Trail are greater than 20,000 S.F. SITE PLANNING: Two of the proposed units in the Oakwood Heights Addition have been completed. This new plat will eliminate 2 of the existing building pads by creating 3 single family lots. . All 15 lots will have access onto a loop, road (Park Knoll Drive). This wooded site, consisting primarily of oaks, ,.falls towards the south with a fairly uniform 208 slope. Since the soil is ' quite sandy, grading on this hillside will be kept to a minimum. The lots, on the north side of the Park Knoll Dr have been designed so that a ravine between lots 7 & 8 will remain untouched. As a result, not all of the lots meet the 85' minimum width at the setback line. Variances for a 20' setback on lots 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 are desired to reduce the grading of the hillside. The setback along wilderness Run Rd is 35' and the existing buildings in the Oakwood Heights Addition will meet code setback requirements. PARK KNOLL ADDITION �•, PAGE 2 GRADING: Prior to this preliminary plat application, the City approved a preliminary plat called the Oakwood Heights Addition. This development requires substantial grading on the very steep northerly hillside of this area to provide for townhome/condominium sites. This development proposes single- family use and staying away from any grading on the very steep northerly side hill. Not having to disturb the side hill will save a great deal of erosion problems in the future because of the sandy soils located in that side hill. The applicant's proposed grading plan is feasible and in _ accordance with City guidelines and codes. The applicant shall finalize the preliminary grading plan and submit it along with an erosion and sediment control plan prior to final plat approval. DRAINAGE: The applicant proposes to preserve the existing westerly drainage patterns over this parcel. To do this, the applicant will have to extend an existing 15" storm sewer pipe located near the northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 2. This storm sewer runs through the Oakwood Heights 1st Addition into Pond LP- • 50. As you can see from Figure 1, Pond LP -50 has an existing outlet to the south under Wilderness Run Road into Pond LP -46. However, Pond LP -46 presently has no outlet and staff has received several complaints from adjacent property owners regarding its high water level. The most recent water elevation staff has on this pond is 883.5 taken in November of 1985. This is 2 ft. over the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan's high water level. -1� Council is considering the storm sewer outlets for Pond LP -46 along with other ponds in the Holland Lake area under Project @444R. The Council will probably be making_a decision regarding Project @444R in April, 1986. Because of the importance of installing a control gravity outlet to Pond LP -46 to control the water level prior to adding any more runoff from additional developments, staff recommends that a condition of final plat approval be that Council approve Project 4444R. • UTILITIES: Trunk water main and trunk sanitary sewer are in place within Wilderness Run Road. These lines have the necessary capacity and depth to provide service to this development. STREETS: Wilderness Run Road abutts the southerly boundary of this proposed development. The City's Master Thoroughfare Plan classifies this roadway as a community collector street. ..Presently, Wilderness Run Road is constructed to an interim 34' wide roadway. When warranted, Wilderness Run Road will be upgraded to a 44' wide roadway with concrete curb and gutter and built to 9 -ton standards. Part of the City collector street standards require the installation of a trailway along it. For Wilderness Run Road, the location for this trailway is along the north side. This trailway should be the responsibility of this development. Although the internal "U -Shaped" street will provide good access and circulation for this small development, staff recommends against providing two bubbles at the corners. These bubbles will /oy2. PARK KNOLL ADDITION PAGE 3 not provide any benefit to any of the lots and will create additional pavement area for future City maintenance. Figure 2 shows what this street would look like with a 70' outside radius and 20' inside radius. Although the applicant did not show the intersection of Sudberry Lane with wilderness Run Road on his submittal drawings, staff researched this and found that Sudberry Lane is located about 125' east of the west intersection of Park Knoll Drive and 205' west of the east intersection of Park Knoll Drive and Wilderness Run Road. The City code requires a minimum of a 125' offset •- between center lines. While the preliminary plat indicates sufficient distance, the Council should not approve the final plat until the exact distance is known. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development will be responsible for dedicating a 40' half right-of-way for Wilderness Run Road. The 50' full right-of-way for Park Knoll Drive meets minimum City - codes and is acceptable to staff on the condition of eliminating • the bubbles and providing a 20' radius for right-of-way on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1. This 20' radius is necessary because when building a roadway within a narrow right-of-way, the curb radius would be located as such that no boulevard would exist between the lot corner and the street. The applicant shall provide a 20' utility easement for the storm sewer between Lots 3 and 4. PERMITS: The applicant will be responsible for obtaining approvals or permits from the following agencies: 1. MPCA - sanitary sewer extension. - 2. Mn. Dept. of Health - water main -extension. 3. MWCC - sanitary sewer extension. ASSESSMENTS: Our assessment records indicate that the City has • assessed all trunk area related assessments, including lateral benefit, to this parcel, with the exception of trunk area storm sewer. As a condition of final plat approval, this development shall accept its responsibility for trunk area storm sewer on the net area of this proposed development. 'At 1986 rates, this would amount to $12,500 (250,000 sq. ft. x $0.05 per square foot). Staff will determine the final assessment amount based on the final plat area and the rates in effect at the time of final platting. All costs associated with internal streets and utilities, plus the trailway construction along Wilderness Run Road, will be the sole responsibility of this development. /o% b PARK KNOLL ADDITION PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. This development shall comply with all applicable general engineering conditions. 2. Council shall approve Project #444R to provide a positive gravity outlet from Pond LP -46 prior to final plat approval. 3. Park Knoll Drive shall not contain any "bubbles" and the intersection with Wilderness Run Road shall be offset at least 125' from the center line of Sudberry Lane. 4. The right-of-way have a 20' radius on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 where Park Knoll Drive turns. 5. This development shall dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Wilderness Run Road and a 50' full right-of-way for Park Knoll Drive. - 6. This development shall dedicate a 20' drainage and utility easement over the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2. 7. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for the costs for the internal streets and utilities and also for the trailway along Wilderness Run Road. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits or approvals as referenced in the report. 10. A blanket variance be granted for a 20' front setback for lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. 11. All standard plat conditions shall'be adhered to. •I • - 2 - 5 JP- 7. iipL 1' 0559.9' 9M2 903.0 903.0 _- - j. 111fAD 3' LP -22 9a0 13 ' LP -66 P-17 P 17 ................ ................ ................ ........... ..... SUBJECT PARCEL G o FIG. +.1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate tandar#a PUBLIC _ n DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN 9 0 :Y n 999 Sao= +z 127 999 qyb `� x • IZ�� 7 , 27t %G7 t � 929 9iy 9939 3p (A//J'. ZI,l � ��11y. . 1131 F-Lp/o1 726 9"/j �71p 92p 929 9l�/ \ YJB rY2 II • 13��b `� q�\ Sir \ \ 9$ \ � Io 922 9N \ 926 9i� 9JL ` 4 i � A qo{ v, • w 9or Z L Ali . 9og / � - I909 •� Y Jt qOt 7. 0 qr0 t qAAOO • c I 090 99b k \ I 900 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 EAGANDALE LeMAY LAKE 2nd ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT At the request of the vice chairman, the Planning Commission reconsidered its motion regarding the preliminary plat for this development as follows: Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to clarify the prior motion to indicate that the planning commission has recommended approval of the preliminary plat of 20.5 acres into 6 lots with a PUD designation, one lot as a Residence Inn, and the remaining lots subject to future review. All voted in favor. PARK KNOLL ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING Vice Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing to hear the applications of Tri -Lana Properties, Inc. requesting a rezoning of 6.6 acres from R-2 to R-1 and a preliminary plat for 15 lots in an area known as Oakwood • Heights Addition in the southeast quarter of Section 26.. City Planner Runkle introduced the application including a history of the plat wherein the original developer•haa not carried through with the development of a townhouse type use. Mr. Brad Swenson was present representing of Tri -Lana Properties, Inc. and described the single family proposal, specifically as it related to wooded areas and drainage. Neighboring residents were present to question the clean up and removal of blacktop and alignment of streets. The developer was also proposing on-site storage of runoff waters, if necessary, to avoid holding up development until the completion of Project #444R. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 with the stipulation that the reduction in density could not be recaptured within other future developments in Lexington South PD. All voted yea. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion' to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. This development shall comply with applicable general engineering conditions. ' 2. Council shall approve Project #444R to provide a positive gravity outlet from Pond LP -46 prior to final plat approval or City approved temporary storage shall be provided on the site. 3. Park Knoll Drive shall not contain any "bubbles" and the intersection with Wilderness Run Road shall be offset at least 125 feet from the center line of Sudberry Lane. 4. The right-of-way shall have a 20 foot radius on Lots 2 and 3 of Block 1 where Park Knoll Drive turns. 5. This development shall dedicate a 40 foot half right-of-way for Wilderness Run Road and a 50 foot full right-of-way for Park Knoll Drive. 6. This development shall dedicate a 20 foot drainage and utility easement over the lot line between Lots 3 and 4 of Block 2. //D 5 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 7. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for the costs for the internal streets and utilities and'ialso for the trailway along Wilderness Run. Road. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits or approvals as referenced in the report. 10. A blanket variance shall be granted for a 20 foot front setback for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. The debris in the northeast portion of the plat shall be cleaned up. ® 13. All lots shall maintain as near as possible, the required 50 foot street frontage. All members voted affirmatively. BURGER KING CORPORATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison in regard to the application of Burger King Corporation for conditional use permits for - the pylon sign and drive-through restaurant located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition in part of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. Dale Runkle opened the presentation, advising that the applicant had worked with the City to provide at least 7 revisions to the plans. Mr. Randy Shaper, representing the applicant, introduced the New Image 87 Plan with three times the normal landscaping, advising however that landscaping would be reduced along the westerly portion of the property to avoid interference with the utility easement. It was noted that the entrance nearest the corner of the intersecting streets had been realigned at an angle to meet engineering requirements. It appeared that 18 foot long parking stalls were being provided based upon the capability for two foot overhang. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a drive-through facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. No building shall take place until the final platting process is completed. 2. Concrete curb and gutter shall be provided in the parking.area. 3. The easterly one-way driveway access from Town Centre Drive shall be located 70 feet from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue. 4. Trees along the utility easement area may be eliminated as necessary, however, small plantings shall be provided. 6 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three CONDITIONAL USE/BURGER KING PYLON SIGN C. Conditional Use Permit for a Pylon Sign and Drive -Through Restaurant --A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on February 25 to consider a pylon sign and drive-through restaurant for the Burger King Corporation located at Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd' Addition. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit for a drive-through restaurant, however, the pylon sign received a two to two vote which represents a failure of a motion to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages through //9 . For additional information regarding action that was taken y the APC, refer to those minutes found on page(s)/1,0 —/Z/ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for the Burger King Corporation allowing a drive-through facility and 2) to approve or deny the pylon sign as presented. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: BURGER KING CORPORATION LOCATION: TOWN CENTRE 3RD ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: C.S.C. (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 18, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a • Conditional Use Permit to allow a pylon sign and drive-through facility for Burger King. This facility will be on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition when those lots become• final platted in the near future. COMMENTS: Access to the Burger King Restaurant will be provided by a main entry/exit along Denmark Avenue. A one-way in from Town Centre .Drive and "exit only" should help alleviate congestion at the intersection. The proposed building is the top of the line model and will seat 93 people. City Code will require that 31 parking stalls be provided. 43 stalls 10' x 18' and a 12' x 18' handicapped stall are shown on the site plan. The drive-through will be on the west side of the building and stacking for approximately 8 cars is provided. The 4 stalls just north of the building .along the drive-through road will be designated "Employee Only". Also, the brick trash enclosure will be on the • north side of the building. The interior lighted pylon sign will be located on the northeasterly portion of the site and is shown 10' within the Yankee Doodle Road and Denmark Avenue. property lines. The total signage area will be 145 sq. ft. per side. This is above the . 125' code standard, however, signs of this type havebeen approved for the Hardee's Restaurants. The height can be 25', 30' or 35'. The drive -up menu board sign will be situated near the entry. of the one-way drive-through. An additional drive -way strip has been provided that will allow for exiting onto Town Centre Drive. A landscape plan was submitted and approved by staff. Parking areas will be bermed and planted with shrubbery as well as trees. If .approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following: - 1) The height of the pylon sign shall be 25'. 2) No building shall take place until the final platting process is completed. //?� MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1986 SUBJECT: ENGINEERING REVIEW OF THE BURGER KING SITE PLAN BURGER KING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION On behalf of the Engineering Department, I have reviewed the site plan dated January 23, 1986 for the Burger King site at the corner of Town Centre Drive and Denmark Avenue. The only problem I have with the site plan is the easterly one way access off of Town Centre Drive. As it is shown, this access is set back 64; feet from Denmark Avenue. This setback is measured from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue to the center line of the one-way access. This 64; foot setback is 5z feet less than what the Engineering Division feels is an absolute minimum setback. (Information note: The minimum setbacks the Engineering Division recommends for a two-way driveway is 100 feet.) This 70 foot setback includes a 30 foot street radius plus a 20 foot tangent section plus a 20 foot driveway radius. This distance also provides for adequate distance for vehicles crossing Denmark Avenue to slow down enough to make the turn into this site. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) The easterly one-way driveway access from Town Centre Drive be located 70 feet from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue. I will be at the February 25, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting to .answer any questions or concerns that the Commission may have regarding this issue. Rese�,ctf�ully S bmitted, • Richard M. H ti Assistant City Engineer RMH:jh 47 IMOplfonal Copy �TH b. �TH 1 P" -_. 1 cel -� � � ,•,.,�• L �•-�•�• e - \ \ •.� p 1 ons-•' :.` � I I :I I iPJ I 4. PJ lens - .- ol 9c5 -- s0 ' - ica f � �•Jlo ..I b 9A DT ._1.w IV ' I Jt• yw— �- :I`{I� I l K )171 � �s� \ 1 ✓' S69 \T W LYJ TOCENTRE DMVE E VU� V CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: PUREX CORPORATION LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK I, EAGANDALE CORPORATE SQUARE, NA, SECTION 11 EXISTING ZONING: L-1 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 14, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a ® conditional use permit for the storage of chlorine bleach chemicals at the Purex Corporation located south of Apollo Rd in section 11. COMMENTS: Purex Corporation currently occupies approx. 150,000 sq. ft. of the 200,000 sq. ft, building (see exhibit A & E). Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance is the owner of the building and the Sperry -Corporation rents the remaining 50,000 sq. ft. This site is just west of the railroad tracks that are used to bring in the chemicals needed for the production of bleach. This manufacturing and warehousing facility produces all of the bottles for the chlorine bleach. The chlorine, stored in the 180,000 pound rail car will be located near the NE portion of the building on the inner rail spur. This is a normal storage facility within the industry and it is done this way at the downtown St. Paul facility as well. • The tank will be padlocked for security even though this plant is operating on a 24 hour basis. Sodium hydroxide will. be stored in a 75,000.9allon diluted caustic tank at the south end of the building. This tank will measure approx. 20' x 50' and be 24' high. The building itself is 27' high and therefore the tank will not be visable from Apollo Rd. The sodium hydroxide will also be delivered by rail at 50% strength. It will then be diluted to a 17% strength before being stored in the subject tank. The resin cars bring in materials used to make the storage bottles. Neither the chlorine or sodium hydroxide is combustible. If approved, the conditional use shall be subject to all applicable ordinances and, 1) A 6' security fence around the sodium hydroxide tank located at the south end of the building. //7 APOLLO ROAD Xom \ BUILDING C SRP LOCA 1 MOOD GAL J DILUTED CAUSTIC TAM( • CLOAME CAR RESIN CARS — EXMT. 810E TRACK EXIST.SPUR LIRE CAUSTIC CAR _SURFACE MOUNTED CAUSTIC LII/ES h [ ! 1 APC Minutes February 25, 1986 7. This development shall be responsible for its trunk area storm sewer assessments at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for the costs for the internal streets and utilities and also for the trailway along Wilderness Run Road. 9. The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary permits or approvals as referenced in the report. 10. A blanket variance shall be granted for a 20 foot front setback for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9. 11. All standard plat conditions :shall be adhered to. 12. The debris in the northeast portion of the plat shall be cleaned up. 13. All Lots shall maintain as near as possible, the required 50 foot • street frontage. All members voted affirmatively. - BURGER KING CORPORATION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The public hearing was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison in regard to the application of Burger King Corporation for conditional use permits for the pylon sign and drive-through restaurant located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 70 3rd Addition in part of the northwest quarter of Section 15, Yankee Doodle and Pilot Knob Roads. Dale Runkle opened the presentation, advising that the applicant had worked with the City to provide at least 7 revisions to the plans. Mr. Randy Shaper, representing the applicant, .introduced the New Image 87 Plan with three times the normal landscaping, advising however that Landscaping would be reduced along the westerly portion of the property to avoid interference with the utility easement. It was noted that the entrance nearest the corner of the intersecting streets had been realigned at an angle to meet engineering requirements. It appeared that 18 foot long parking stalls were being provided based upon the capability for two foot overhang. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a arive-through facility, subject to the following conditions: 1. No building shall take place until the final platting process is completed. 2. Concrete curb and gutter shall be provided in the parking area. 3. The easterly one-way driveway access from Town Centre Drive shall be located 70 feet from the west curb line of Denmark Avenue. 4. Trees along the utility easement area may be eliminated as necessary, however, small plantings shall be provided. rl APC Minutes February 25, 1986 All members voted yes. Planning Commission members Harrison and Voracek expressed concerns regarding the fairness of the distribution of pylon signs in the proposed development under existing City Code. Staff was directed to address the issue. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign 25 feet in height with not more than 125 square feet of surface on each side. Bohne and Wilkins voted aye; Voracek and Harrison voted nay. DIAL CORPORATION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing for conditional use permit for outside storage of chlorine on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale • Corporate Square, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 11, east of Neil Armstrong Blvd. and south of Apollo Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the request. Also present were Tom Davis and a representative of Dial Corporation (formerly Purex Corporation). There was substantial discussion regaraing the danger of exposure to escaping chlorine or caustic chemicals in addition to the safety measures being implemented by the applicant. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the matter to the next meeting and direct the staff to resolve the issue of whether or not this use would be considered Heavy Industrial use and not appropriate for Light Industrial area. All voted aye. CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN The public hearing for a conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 30, at Cliff Road and Nicols Road, was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison. Dale Runkle introduced the application, reviewing ordinance requirements. Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present to represent Federal Land Company. It was noted that a reader board would not be included in the sign. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign. Ail members voted affirmatively. LAUKKA—BECK — WAIVER OF PLAT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing regarding a request for waiver of plat to split Outlot F in the Lone Oak Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 1, at Lone Oak Road and 'Trunk Highway #149. Dale Runkle described the request as necessary to convey a strip of land to the adjoining church as originally intended prior to development of the remaining land. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, with the strong recommendation that the church rezone the property to PF (Public Facilities) in the near future. All voted yes. 7 Agenda Informa"tion Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & PYLON SIGN/FEDERAL LAND COMPANY D. A Conditional Use Permit for a Twenty -Foot Pylon Sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition --The APC held a public hearing on February 25, 1986, to consider an appli- cation submitted by the Federal Land Company to allow a pylon sign for the Cedar Cliff Office Building along Nicols Road, north of the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. The APC is recommending approval of the pylon sign,subject to the staff report and further that the sign did meet all ordinance criteria. For a copy of the Planning Department report on this item, refer to pages /z 3 through / For a copy of the APC action • on this item, refer to page:(s)/Z ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit allowing a 201 pylon sign for Federal Land Company advertising Cedar Clift Commercial Park Addition. is /2v CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - SIGN APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND CO LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK ADDITION, SE4, SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. ( PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ) . DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 12, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign for the Cedar Cliff Office Building along NicolS Rd, just north of the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. COMMENTS: This proposed 20' tall, interior lighted sign will be the same style as the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center sign. It will be located 10' within .the Nicols Rd & Cliff Dr property lines. Each side of this sign will contain 125 S.F. of signage area excluding the brick pillar posts. Code permits 250 S.F. total sign area. Previously, an application for this sign was denied for several reasons. The main being that there is another pylon sign at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. The City Attorney's office has interpreted the code to permit this sign since it is on a separate lot and will be more than 300' from the nearest pylon sign. The sign is necessary for the existing tenants in the • building and the Federal Land staff believes potential tenants are being lost due to the lack of visability. Sign bands on the building would be the otheroption to this pylon sign. If .approved, this pylon sign .shall be subject to the $2.50 per S.F. sign fee and all other applicable sign ordinances. 1 �.,t. CEDAR L'IFF 'q® FOR%THE FEDERAL L'A" :COMPANY' i I - li.•: •.1 1� J-- �. 6 �h' '" INDEX 70 DRAWINGS 1.91.E/L1N090aPE P{AM illl� 1 aIn6T ft00aPUM+ . I 3.?FEcaNa FLoogr •A, BNLDINO ELEVA OMS -;/h G: I�.,.—• is '�1 j. 6. weL\sec.lofl0. t s.ela S�ECTI5 D A. Fnn TYPES OOa o [ I } I 6-1 EOVXOaiIO 1 t A 6-2SECONDMOOR AN 6-3 POOP FRAMINGFUN � i JAOP06E0 POAO . ,. _IF MAR QFF slnnro cEFaEn s l TrPlcE Ai eEant ei nrn NG ooh . : 3 a 'SREIUNDSCAPE PLAN (Gredhq Ren by Gradng subeWractar) - . -'�SIGNiPiwluo om '• Gradc—> • )FROM ELEVATION „•� ,9 BERM •• 2cb iI'i b_u. 24' o idea •81 aITUMr _ 9ERM C'. 4' WE�FINfr- oJE5P, • I i N r ;� � 7_v. t1��cRiv ii I . SSB OETAIL-- ( 10' Set bo.;'.:.# prop 4,/ Ilnes) sen Klr. w yw, e.Lc.+maa. M eLra sF�ieq, 00•.w.,•L.+ Ke�lnLaTh •U. -[n LMw y t •r .50.01.cr orLw+. L.t.+� 6 a• ca. w., GY1 LA li. h. 1 `-• +" To�L.I S. e 125S.F. ~• � 1' �' -�–� ., 1, I,I ' � I •III L I: i Ji e rI.1 .L.J 1 3.01-- I I•I 310 s � I II r -r it T ; T�, _T r,n I " I � I IL.I 1 T 1 IFT ! I I )FROM ELEVATION „•� ,9 BERM •• 2cb iI'i b_u. 24' o idea •81 aITUMr _ 9ERM C'. 4' WE�FINfr- oJE5P, • I i N r ;� � 7_v. t1��cRiv ii I . SSB OETAIL-- ( 10' Set bo.;'.:.# prop 4,/ Ilnes) sen Klr. w yw, e.Lc.+maa. M eLra sF�ieq, 00•.w.,•L.+ Ke�lnLaTh •U. -[n LMw y t •r .50.01.cr orLw+. L.t.+� 6 a• ca. w., GY1 LA li. h. HAUGE, SMITH & EIDE, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW - CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 7808 SIBLEY MEMORI.LL HIGHWAY "GAN. MINNESOTA 55122 PAUL H HAUGE BRADLEY SMITH KEVIN M EIDE RALPH W. COREY February 18, 1985 Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Cedar Cliff Bank Facility - Pylon Sign Dear Mr. Hedges: A.C. CODE 412 TLLKnwNE 454.4724 At the February 5, 1985 City Council meeting, the City Council approved a conditional use permit for a pylon sign to be erected on Cliff Road for the drive-in bank facility planned at that location by Federal Land Company. This approval was subject to an opinion from our office affirming that the Sign Ordinance does not prevent the erection of such a sign. The question is whether City Code, Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. relating to Area Identification Signs for Shopping Centers and Other Major Complexes prevents erection of the sign. Section 4.20, Subd. 6.c. reads as follows: 11C. Major Complex. When an area identification is required, such as for a shopping center, major apartment complex, or major industrial building, up to one free-standing of pylon sign may be allowed for each major industrial street. The Council shall determine the maximum size after reviewing the applicable conditions including terrain, safety factors, etc." This Section must be read in conjunction with Section 4.20, Subd. 6.b. which allows up to one pylon sign per building. The proposed sign for the drive-in bank facility is not intended to be an area identification sign relating to a major complex, and for this reason, it would come under Subd. 6.b., rather than Subd. 6.c. Consequently, the proposed sign is allowable under the ordinance. It is true that there is already an area identification sign erected for Cedar .Cliff Shopping Center, near the corner of Nicols Road and Cliff Road. However, since the bank is a separate building, it would still be allowed its own sign under Subd. 6.b. Because Subd. 6.c. allows a certain number of signs per major adjacent street rather than per building, we interpret Subd. 6.c. 11 Thomas Hedges February 18„ 1985 Page 2 not as a substituteforSubd. 6.b. whenever a building is part of a major complex, but rather as authorization for more than one sign per building in a very limited number of circumstances. For these reasons, it is our opinion that the proposed pylon sign for the drive -up bank facility near. Cedar Cliff Shopping Center is not in violation of the Sign Ordinance. • Very truly yours, HAUGE, SMITH & EIDE, P.A. Bradley Sm Assistant City Attorney BS:ras APC Minutes February 25, 1986 All members voted yes. Planning Commission members Harrison and Voracek expressed concerns regarding the fairness of the distribution of pylon signs in the proposed development under existing City Code. Staff was directed to address the issue. Bohne moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign 25 feet in height with not more than 125 square feet of surface on each side. Bohne and Wilkins voted aye; Voracek and Harrison voted nay. DIAL CORPORATION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing for conditional use permit for outside storage of chlorine on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale Corporate Square, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 11, east of Neil Armstrong Blvd, and south of Apollo Road. City Planner Runkle • introduced the request. Also present were Tom Davis and a representative of Dial Corporation (formerly Purex Corporation). There was substantial discussion regarding the danger of exposure to escaping chlorine or caustic chemicals in addition to the safety measures being implemented by the applicant. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to continue the matter to the next meeting and direct the staff to resolve the issue of whether or not this use would be considered Heavy Industrial use and not appropriate for Light Industrial area. All voted aye. CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PYLON SIGN The public hearing for a conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign on Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park Addition, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 30, at Cliff Road and Nicols Road, was then convened by Vice Chairman Harrison. Dale Runkle introduced the application, reviewing ordinance requirements. Mr. Charles Bartholdi was present to 40 represent Federal Land Company. It was noted that a reader board would not be included in the sign. Bohne moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for a 20 foot pylon sign. All members voted affirmatively. LAUKKA—BECK — WAIVER OF PLAT Vice Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing regarding a request for waiver of plat to split Outlot F in the Lone Oak Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 1, at Lone Oak Road and Trunk Highway #149. Dale Runkle described the request as necessary to convey a strip of land to the adjoining church as originally intended prior to development of the remaining land. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, with the strong recommendation that the church rezone the property to PF (Public Facilities) in the near future. All voted yes. - 1' O 7 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT & VARIANCE/TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS E. A Conditional Use Permit and Variance for a Four Gas Pump Island with Canopy Added to Existing Convenience Store --A public hearing was held by the APC at there last meeting held on February 25, 1986 to consider a conditional use permit application for gasoline pumps and a variance for the canopy above the gasoline pumps at the Tom Thumb Food Market in the Bicentennial Addition adjacent to Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. The APC is recommending that the conditional use permit and variance be denied. For additional information on this item refer to the Planner's • report, a copy is enclosed on pages AD through 135. For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s) 13,& ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) A conditional use permit to allow four gasoline pumps and an island at the Tom Thumb Food Market 2) To approve or deny a variance allowing a canopy on the gas pumps and island'. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE APPLICANT: TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS/FEDERAL LAND LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 14, 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM • APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted request- ing a conditional use permit for gasoline pumps and a variance for the canopy above these tanks at the Tom Thumb Food •Market in the Bicentennial Addition along Yankee Doodle Rd & Washington Dr. L COMMENTS: The proposed 4 pump facility will have two-way access from Washington. Dr. Al Baker's Restaurant and the Amoco Station are to the east and the Amoco Car Care Center is to the south. A variance is requested since the 24' x 40' free-standing canopy is approx. 7' from the eastern property line. There are no overhead utilities to be concerned with. The underground storage tanks will be made of fiberglass and located directly south of the pump area. Ample room has been allowed.. for the refueling of these tanks by .semi trucks along the back of the Tom Thumb. Stacking for 1 car on each side of the pumps is being provided. No additional signage is being requested. The only building modification will be a window to the pump area for gasoline pur- chases only. There are no specific conditions stated in the. P.D. agreement in regard 'to gas pumps at the Yankee Square Shopping Center. The applicant has submitted a statement detailing their reasons for this conditional 'use permit/variance request and it has been attached for your review. Representives will be present at the Advisory Planning Commission meeting with rendered site plans and sketches to help illustrate their proposal. MEMO TO: ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION DALE RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1986 :SUBJECT: ENGINEERING REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE FOR TOM THUMB GAS PUMPS AT YANKEE SQUARE - The layout for the Yankee Square site as presented is totally unacceptable. This site proposes a curb opening in excess of 90 feet. This will create mass confusion between vehicles attempt- ing to obtain access to the pump station and vehicles attempting to obtain access to the Yankee Square parking lot. In addition, it appears this site would require a variance from the 20 foot green space requirement with a triangular shaped boulevard area. It is difficult to tell how much variance would be required because Washington Drive is not drawn to scale. The site plan shows Washington Drive as a 52 foot roadway. Washington Drive is actually • a 44 foot roadway. Finally, 18 feet does not provide a great deal of room for vehicles attempting to drive through-. this site if there are vehicles stopped at the gas pumps. The applicant could change the site layout to provide for a 30 foot wide driveway entrance situated at right angles to the curb on Washington Drive. While this would satisfy my requirements for access, it still will not eliminate the need for a green space variance or will it provide for two car stacking distance at the north driveway. Also, it will not improve the limited bypass space the 18 foot lane allows. I cannot recommend approval of the proposed gas pump site at the Yankee Square location for the following reasons: 1) Driveway width is far too wide. • 2) Green space variance is required. 3) The north access cannot provide for two car stacking distance. 4) The 18 foot width does not provide for a desirable bypass lane. '. I will be at the February 25, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting to answer any questions or concerns you may have regarding these items. ; Respectfully Submitted, Richard M. Assistant City Engineer • Ll whp 'b .0. SH C PMI y� p si I n Q IICN/ C/L IMIM 21 WGPRs �V •�` ' ° �I �� ' •' GSL EIRI PPPR P, f � � I VI c�.l ULI ©xc, I S { -�r. Il o-lr " X q Y i cl <P -- rlPe oeiE wow a COMM. r )om�w ICRMAWR'\f 'MNR _.r GpR0i,�19PPM1 Viil .[smngr(jc �Y 8 VGRe I Y4MICIPIL �e /11J crxrER � � r`� s.x+.ti sn - - u[r[w.o r.wn eoow[ �ofe nm co 1 wa fYOCe Gm GP[=[w!e . mGos®PMP OSSVD mWPM Q� I1 lUJIM1 �WI�J�IoJ . Boon) MAG KE7990HQ AWCO 9TAM el+ h roe C � _ �fw LL[•.nl 110P11111MI. ■ 9 PARK e M i PLANTING SCHEDULE Rncr >�Y•e.�.1• • nava wrs tl •� •[ Iwal 8 � 8� •.•w WM _ 1 Mbu u•P 1 OJI' YNR .FII[C F•.r•W •r�1�Y 6 1 �%I ' � •ISM m o"....�.e.•, �P Fuchs -VIEW FROM NORTHEAST , rp Euchs APC Minutes February 25, 1986 TOM THUMB FOOD MARKETS — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE Vice Chairman Harrison then called the public hearing regarding the request for a conditional use permit for gasoline pumps and a variance for the canopy above said pumps at the Tom Thumb Food Market in the Bicentennial Addition along Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. Dale Runkle introduced the request indicating that variances would be necessary from the requirements for service bays and the setbacks. Mr. George May was present to represent Tom Thumb Food Markets as well as Mr. Charles Bartholdi for the Lana owner, Federal Land Company. Discussion centered around the following: 1. Present traffic problems at that location which may be complicated by the addition of gasoline pumps. 2. Green space and set back requirements. 3. Ability to stack cars without parking in Washington Drive or,blocking the entrance to the shopping center. In addition comments were made by attorney, Ted Meyer, representing the neighboring Amoco and Certicare facilities, including: 4. Adequate parking. 5. Loading and unloading trucks. 6. The high concentration of gas pumps in that.immediate area. 7. The reliance of his clients upon the ordinance requirements for full service—service stations. 8. That the planned development did not indicate motor fuel sales. Bohne moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the application based upon existing City Code and policy requiring service bays with the sale of motor fuel, in addition to' the objections of the City Engineer, as follows: 1. Driveway width is far too wide. 2. Green space variance is required. 3. The north access cannot provide for two car stacking distance. 4. The 18 foot width does not provide for a desirable by—pass lane. All voted yes. 134 9 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six AMENDMENT/LAND USE REGULATIONS/SECTION 11.20 F. Consideration of Amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use Regulations, Section 11.20 in Your Review and Termination --The Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing at the January 28, and again at the February 25 meetings to consider an amendment, to the subdivision regulations within the .City Code that requires public hearings for all extensions of a planned development. In other words, if a planned unit development contract is approved between the City Council and a developer for a five year period of time and that developer at the end of five ® (5) years asks for an extension for his/her P.U.D. agreement, a public hearing would be required under the new ordinance amendment . The APC is recommending approval of the subdivision • ameVnment, and for a copy.of the new ordinance refer to page For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page(s) ACTION TO B CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to City Code, Chapter 11, Land Use Regulation, Section 11..20, which allows for public hearing for any P.U.D. extension of time. X37 TI 4 Second Revision ORDINANCE NO. _, 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE, CHAPTER 11, ENTITLED "LAND USE REGULATIONS" BY ADDING PROVISIONS FOR PUBLIC BEARINGS RENEWAL, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.20, Subd. B.E. "Annual Review and Termination" is hereby amended as follows: E. Annual Review, Extension and Termination. 1. The Planning Commission 'Phe--eounei*;--or--by-direetion; and the Pfanning-eommission Council, shall review annually after approval of the "preliminary plan", the progress of each planned development to determine whether or not the applicant has substantially complied with the Planned Development Agreement. a. Each body shall make note thereof in its the minutes at -a • regular -meetings b. If the applicant/owner/developer of an unexpired planned development agreement has failed to comply with the agreement, the Council may, in its sole discretion, after recommendation by the Advisory Planning Commission, at a duly advertised and noticed public hearing as required by Code Section 11.40, Subd. 5, remove the superimposed planned development zoning by resolution, and the land area within the planned development shall automatically revert to its prior basic zoning classification. 2. Upon the expiration of the term of a planned development agreement for a development which has not been substantially completed a duly advertised and noticed public hearing, as required by Section 11.40 Subd. 5., shall be held by the Planning Commission which shall make a recommendation to the City Council • whether the planned development agreement shall be terminated, and if terminated whether the planned development zoning shall be removed. The applicant shall provide an accurate list of property owners within 350 feet of the development. a. The City Council may extend the planned development agreement noting its reasons in its minutes. b. If the City Council determines that the planned development agreement shall be terminated it shall also determine whether the planned development zoning shall be removed. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Clerk Its Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the legal newspaper: APC Minutes February 25, 1986 MURPHY STREET The Advisory Planning Commission members noted the request to rename the frontage road, west of I -35E and north of Deerwood Drive, to Murphy Street. It was suggested that Murphy Drive sounded better. Bohne moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend changing the name to Murphy Drive. All voted in favor. RENEWAL, EXTENSION AND TERMINATION OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the proposed revision to Eagan City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.20, Subd. 8.E. as prepared by the City Attorney. All voted aye. ADJOURNMENT Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to adjourn the meeting at 11:35 p.m. All voted yes. Secretary /399 DGK Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven TEMPORARY ADVERTISING,SIGN/DALLAS DEVELOPMENT IST ADDITION G. Temporary Advertising Sign for Dallas Development, 1st Addition --An Application was submitted to the Planning Department for a special permit to allow a temporary advertising/leasing sign along Highway 13 south of Silver Bell Road. For a copy of the Planning Department Report refer to page's _aL through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or.denythe special permit for a temporary advertising/leasing sign as requested by Dallas Development Company. /�o SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: CITY OF EAGAN SPECIAL PERMIT DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY SE a, SECTION 18 LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) MARCH 19, 1986 MARCH 12, 1986 JIM STURM • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted for a special permit to allow a temporary advertising/leasing sign along Highway 13 south of Silver Bell Road. COMMENTS: This plat has been renamed Dallas Development 1st Addition, however, the project will be marketed as "Silver Bell Plaza". This proposed 4' x 8' non -lighted sign will be located near the eastern property line. The double-faced sign will be made of plywood and have a 10' maximum height. City Code will require that this sign be placed 10' within the property line and subject to the one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. ppi.n 6v PXN'DO �y�. 4.4 w=o � SILVER 13ELL PLAZA NOW LEASING 941-2971 OFFICE/SNOWROOM/SERVICE -9 60rm5 FI;OM 1400 TO IO10005f. ° bALL46DEUELOFART CO. TEMFORARY REAL E5TATE /21TA- My 13 e hILNER a L i Ba ;, ,�.\ • 'rte • N DATA ' RM 11�� M+�K /• �rrw.�a �� ■k / to M1� STATE TRUNK HGHWAY N0. 13 O .' i SITE PLAN -StSN lDC A m O IJ 41 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight REQUEST TO AMEND OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE POLICY H. Consideration of Request To Amend Off Sale Liquor License Policy --A letter was submitted by the Federal Land. Company requesting that the off sale liquor license policy be amended to allow for one (1) additional license to be used in the Town. Center - Eagan Shopping Center. At the July 16, 1985 City Council meeting, the off sale liquor license policy was amended by defining new geographic boundaries; however, it was determined that the number of off sale liquor licenses would remain at four (4). Federal Land Company has been made aware by this office of the history regarding the geographic location and number of off sale liquor licenses, however, at their request, this item was placed on the agenda for City Council consideration. A copy of a letter requesting an additional off s���/ W. liquor license for the Shopping Center is enclosed on page /T� . If it is the desire of the City Council to consider an amendment to the off sale liquor license policy that would generate one (1) additional off sale liquor license, additional background information will be provided by city staff. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny any further consideration for changing the off sale liquor license policy by amending the number of off sale liquor licenses that can.be granted within the community. /�3 ro � I Federal :0 Land Company Yankee Square Office III • 3460 Washington Drive • Suite 202 • Eagan, Minnesota 55144 • Tel. 612452-3303 March 5, 1986 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan P.O. Box 21-199 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Mn. 55122 HE: Off Sale Liquor License • Dear Mr. Hedges: The purpose of this letter is to petition the Eagan City Council for 1a consideration and change of the off sale liquor license policy currently in effect in the City of Eagan. Proceedurally, it is my understanding that Federal Land Company must officially request to be placed on the agenda for the next Eagan City Council meeting. Therefore, Federal Land Company officially requests that it be placed on the March 19, 1986 Eagan City Council Agenda to consider our petition for a change in the current number of off sale liquor licenses in the City of Eagan and to request that an off sale liquor, . license be issued for use in the Town Centre—Eagan Shopping Center. Sincerely,I Mark E. Battis Legal Department, Attorney ,• I MEB/ap i I i i I I i I l I Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine M.G. ASTLEFORD-CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT I. M.G. Astleford for Request to Review Expenses Relating to the CTC Business Campus Development Agreement --The City of Eagan entered into a development agreement with Astleford-Anderson dated April 16, 1985. one purpose of a development agreement is to protect the City from incurring any costs related to a project initiated by the developer. As a part of this development agreement there is specific language that reads as follows: "The developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable engineering, administrative and legal expenses incurred or to be incurred by City in connection with this agreement, plat approval • and acceptance, authorization of improvements including bidding, easement acquisition, reports and hearings, construction inspection, surveys and compliance, tests including environmental assessments and or environmental impact statements, if required". The City has incurred $12,715.61 of expenses to Project 434 which is Technology Drive/CTC Business Campus which should be reimbursable as a condition of the development agreement. The M.G. Astleford Company has been placed on notice several times through written correspondence and verbal discussion that this amount is due and payable to the City of Eagan. Legal counsel for M.G. Astleford Inc. has submitted a letter to the City asking that a bond for the $12,000 be allowed upon M.G. Astleford commencing legal action within 30 days of putting up the bond to obtain a legal determination of their responsibility for the expenses and further would like an opportunity to review • the matter with City Council. In summary, the City accepted engineering, legal and surveying responsibilities upon request by Astleford-Anderson and performed the work with the understanding and language within the development agreement that these costs would be fully reimbursed to the City. For additional information on this item, refer o pertinent pages of the development agreement found on pages — through , a copy of correspondence from the City Administrator to Mr. Ray Williams representing the M.G. Astleford Company on pages through /tj'Y . Finally, a copy of a letter from legal coun el representing M.G. Astleford requesting that the City allow for a bond in the amount of $12,000, condition upon M.G. Astleford commencing legal action within 30 days of putting up the bond to obtain a legal determination of their responsibility for the expenses. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the request presented to the City by legal counsel for M.G. Astleford asking for a deviation of policy for financial obligations as enforced by development agreements. 1�5 CITY OF EAGAN CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on the 16th day of April, 1985, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a municipality of the State of Minnesota, (hereinafter called the CITY), and the Owner and the Developer identified herein. A. The term "Developer" as used herein refers to: ASTLEFORD-ANDERSON, a joint venture consisting of RICHARD W. ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, a Minnesota • general partnership, and M. G. ASTLEFORD COMPANY, a general partnership, whose address is P. 0. Box 5302, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. B. The term "Owner" as used herein refers to: M. G. ASTLEFORD COMPANY, INC. whose address is 1200 West Highway #13, Burnsville, MN 55337. WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City for approval of the plat or subdivision known as CTC BUSINESS CAMPUS located within the City; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of said approval, the City requires the installation and/or availability of streets, water, sanitary ® sewer, related services, storm sewer pipes, ponds, or other facilities; and, . WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes Chapters 412 and 462, the City Council has agreed to approve said plat on the conditions: (1) that the Developer enter into this Development Contract, which contract defines the work which the Developer undertakes to complete within the boundaries of said plat as described hereafter, and (2) the Developer shall provide a bond, letter of credit, or collateral agreement in the amount and with conditions satisfactory to the City, providing for the securing to the City the actual construction and installation of such improvements within the period specified by the City. NOW THEREFORE, the City, Owner and Developer agree as follows: 1 understood by the parties, however, that the responsibility of the Developer is limited by strikes and force majeure. 9. City Liability. The Developer specifically releases and agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless, the City of Eagan, all members of the Eagan City Council, and all employees and agents of the City of Eagan from any and all claims, liabilities, causes of action, or litigation which may arise from third parties, including but not limited to contractors, sub-contractors, and any persons who may now or in the future have any interest in the property involved herein, relating to performance or the failure to perform the above described work or the performance or failure to perform any act concerning special assessments or connection charges relating to the property involved herein, except through intentional fraudulent misrepresentation, and further releases and agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the members of the Eagan City Council, all employees and agents of the City, from any personal Liability in connection with handling funds pursuant to the terms of this agreement, except through intentional fraudulent misrepresentation. W. City Miscellaneous Expenses. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable engineering, administrative and legal expenses • incurred or to be incurred by City in connection with this agreement, plat approval and acceptance, authorization of improvements including bidding, easement acquisition, reports and hearings, construction inspection, surveys and compliance tests including Environmental Assessments and/or Environmental Impact Statements, if required. 11. Escrow Requirement. The final plat shall not be approved and no work shall be commenced under this contract until the Developer has deposited with the City a satisfactory bond, letter of credit, or collateral agreement for 60% of the estimated cost of the improvements specified in paragraph 3 and 13 • • Recorder and the owner shall provide and execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording of this agreement. 23. Binding Agreement. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all terms and conditions of this recordable agreement shall run with the land herein described and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, administrators and assigns of the owners and developers referenced in this Contract. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals. CITY OF EAGAN (Datee�:�y-�')�a�8S//� ) By:X11/L�A/.1 I Its MayoV Q Attest: �J Its luerk Dev ent Contract prove as to Form: Eagan City Attorney (Date:-/G-cS"�C) Department of Vubvig Works (Date: THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Hauge, Smith 6 Eide, P. A. Attorneys for the City of Eagan 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, MN 55122 (612) 454-4224 18 OWNER: M.G.ASTLEFORD COMPANY,INC. D e Its: By: Date It DEVELOPER:,ASTLEFORD-ANDERSON, a joint venture By:_ Its: And: Its: 6oL"� lam! 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD,. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mo PHONE; (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH January 31, 1986 MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Coumd Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator . EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Geek MR RAY WILLIAMS M G ASTLEFORD COMPANY 1200 WEST HWY 13 BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Re: Project 434, Technology Drive/CTC Business Campus - • Financial Obligations Dear Ray: As a result of our meeting the other day, I've had an opportunity to research in further detail the costs incurred by the City in conjunction with processing the proposed CTC Business Campus development and the related public street and utility improvements. After discussing the background of this development with our Director of. Finance and Director of Public Works, it has been determined that the following costs have been incurred by the City of Eagan: Engineering $10,033.08 Legal 1,743.55 Surveying 938.98 Total $12,715.61 During our most recent meeting and other previous discussions, you have requested consideration for deferring the collection of those costs incurred until the property develops at some future date under the premise that the work performed could be applied to the required future public improvements. However, you did indicate a willingness to pay that portion of the outstanding balance due pertaining to the legal costs incurred by the City. After reviewing the work performed by the Engineering and Surveying firms with our Director of Public Works, it has been determined that little, if any, of this work could be applied towards any potential future public improvements. This is due to the fact that the majority of the work was based on elevationsandan alignment that required a cooperative agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation that could have only been performed during the final construction phases of I -35E which has now been completed. Future development ooff/f this property will not have THE LONE OAK TREE_ ..THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MR RAY WILLIAMS PROJECT 434 JANUARY 31, 1986 PAGE 2 the opportunity to take into consideration this past cooperative venture with MnDot. Subsequently, any future public improvements will require complete new surveying and engineering studies to be evaluated based on:;,.whatever development is proposed for that site. The City has incurred similar situations with other developers in the past whereby extensive detailed engineering, planning, legal and surveying costs have been incurred only to have the project rescinded by the developer's request at a later date. In all past similar situations, the City has required payment in full of all costs incurred which has been fully complied with by the affected developers in conformance with past contractual agreements. is While the City can appreciate the problems that were experienced in trying to make this a successful project, the City cannot afford to finance speculative ventures for development that occurs within the City. This is the reason for requiring the guarantee of the owner/developer for all costs that may be incurred before' the City will agree to initiate a public improvement process. As you are aware, M.G. Astleford, Inc. cosigned the Development Contract Agreement with the City of Eagan as a representative of the owner and as a partner of the developer wherein all these costs that would be incurred by the City were guaranteed to be paid. It is unfortunate that you were not able to complete your develop- ment as you had anticipated. However, we hope that you will recognize the City's position regarding our concern for costs incurred in good faith on behalf of the developer's request and ® that you will honor your previous commitments and reimburse the City for the expenses that were incurred in trying to process and facilitate your development request. By doing so, you will maintain your firms credibility with the City and will greatly enhance our willingness and ability to assist you in any future development proposals that you may pursue in the City of Eagan. Your anticipated cooperation in remitting payment for the outstand- ing balance due for the attached invoices will be greatly appreciat- ed. If I can provide any assistance or additional information in helping to clarify the City's position regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me. S iptN<erely, k C cM�7J Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TAC/jbd enclosures cc; Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works r INCE & LISZT, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW Suite 312 8900 Penn Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431 (612) 881-8805 RICHARD T: INCE Mayor Blomquist City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 March 4, 1986 Re: M. G. Astleford, Inc. Dear Mayor: MARVIN A LISZT My client M. G. Astleford, Inc. entered into a development contract with the City of Eagan on April 16, 1985, for the CTS Business Campus Development that had been started by Richard W. Anderson Associates. By the development agreement, M. G. Astleford, Inc. agreed in paragraph 10 as follows: 10. City Miscellaneous Expenses. The Developer agrees to reimburse the City for all reasonable engineering, administrative and legal expensed incurred or to be incurred by City in connection with this agreement, plat approval and acceptance, authorization of improve- ments including bidding, easement acquisition, reports and hearings, construction inspection, surveys and compliance tests including Environmental Assessments and/or Environmental Impact Statements, if required. • The agreement is clear we agree to reimburse expenses of the City as incurred as a result of this agreement. The project did not get completed and the City has sent Astleford approximately $12,000.00 in invoices they have for the project from its beginning, which upon examination of the invoices includes billing for time periods before our development agreement. We dispute the obligation to the extent it seeks recovery of expenses that were incurred by Anderson. The problem is that Mr. Colbert, as Director of Public Works, has ad- vanced the City's position as follows: I I l Mayor -City of Eagan March 4, 1986 -Page Two - It is the City's position that no further development proposals will be processed -by the City where M. G. Astleford has any involvement as the landowner, developer or applicant until past accounts have been brought up to date. I strongly encourage you to facilitate whatever action is necessary to bring your account up to date so that there will be no further delays on any future development proposals within the City of Eagan. In addition to the hold on the excavation permit referenced above, the City is not processing your ® petition to prepare a feasibility report for the installation of public improvements with the Ridge - cliff development until this matter has been satis- factorily resolved. The alternative would be a City requirement for you to post a cash escrow based on the estimated costs_of any future requests. thus, effectively precluding any further activity of Astleford until this problem is resolved. My client stands to sustain large losses if this position is maintained by the City, a position we believe is unfair. We want to maintain a good relationship with the City, and continue doing business in Eagan. To that end, we have asked that we be allowed to put up a bond for the $12,000.00 conditioned upon us commencing legal action with 30 days of putting up the bond to obtain a legal determination of our responsibility for the expenses. Upon placement of the bond we would expect the projects presently • underway to be allowed to proceed. It would seem that such a resolution would be fair to both sides and adequately protect the interests of the City pending final resolution. Sincerely, INCE & LISZT, P.A. Ri and T. Ince RTI:lg /5v Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty STAR CITY RECERTIFICATION J. Star City Recertification --The Economic Development Commission has completed its review and preparation for Star City Recertifica- tion. At the last regular meeting of the Economic Development Commission a set of goals and objectives were set forth for what is now categorized as the Two -Year Action Plan and the ongoing Five -Year Action Plan. Action is required by the City Council on both of the Action plans as recommended by the Economic Develop- ment Commission. For a list of the Two and Five -Year Action Plans refer to pages /611 through 151. A copy of the annual report which includes background information on activities performed by the Economic Development Commission and a more detailed analysis of each of the Two -Year and Five -Year Action Plan activities will be included with the Additional Information packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the list of objectives for Star City Recertification as presented. /6�3 EAGAN TWO-YEAR ACTION PLAN WORK PLAN WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION DATE STATUS 1. Update Five Year City Administrator July 1, 1986 To be completed Capital Improvement City Staff, Public Plan Works Department 2. Update Labor Survey EDC, Labor Survey June 1, 1987 To be completed Committee 3• Solid Waste Study City Planner Aug. 1, 1986 To be completed City Staff, EDC 4. Economic Development/ EDC, Oct. 1, 1986 To be completed Port Authority ' City Administrator Feasibility Study City Staff 5. Review Zoning City Planner, June 1, 1986 To be completed Code Classifications City Staff, APC 6. Update Comprehensive City Planner, APC. Sept. 1, 1986 In progress Guide City Staff, City Council 7. Completion of I-494 City Council Aug. 1, 1986 In progress Mn DOT ' ® 8. Upgrade County/ Public Works Sept. 1, 1986 In progress City Collector Roads Dept., Dakota County 9• 24 Hour Emergency EDC, City Jan. 1, 1987 In progress Care Center Council, Chamber _ of Commerce .10. Construct Eagan City Council, City Aug. 1, 1987 In progress High School Staff, School District 11. Update Star City June 1, 1986 In progress Book, Slide Set, City Staff, EDC Promotional Chamber of Materials Commerce 12. Develop Categorized City Staff, Jan. 1, 1987 In progress Presentation File EDC EACAN TW3-YEAR AMCN PIAN PAGE 2 WORK TASKS ASSI(NMERP COMPLEMN DA'I'S S US 13. Review Industrial City Staff, EDC June 1, 1986 To be campleted Call Process/Budget Chamber of Commerce 14. Review Small EDC, Chamber of Sept. 1, 1986 In progress Business Financing Caimerce Programs 1'!�5 FAGAN FIVE-YEAR ACTION PLAN WORK PLAN WORK TASKS ASSIGNMENT COMPLETION DATE STATUS ,. 1. Promote Large Chamber of 1986-1988 In progress Retail Facilities Commerce, EDC 2. Construct Eagan City Council 1989 To be completed Community Center City Staff • 3. Promote Seneca City Council 1989 To be completed Treatment Plant Public Works Expansion Director, EDC 4. Develop 5 -Year Director of 1986-1988 In progress Major Street Plan Public Works 5. Develop Schedule of Director of 1986-1988 In progress Trunk Utility Public Works Completion 6. Develop Commercial- — City Staff 1986-_1989 In progress Industrial Databases 7. Identify and Study City Planner 1988 To be completed Redevelopment Needs City Administrator, ® City Staff 8. Assess Airport Noise City Staff 1986-1990 In progress Impacts and City Administrator Alternatives 9. Assess Mass Transit City Planner, 1987-1988 To be completed Needs Public Works Dept. City Staff 10. Monitor Electrical Chamber of 1986-1990 In progress Rates Commerce 11. Concept Plan for EDC, City Staff 1987-1988 To be completed Senior Life Style Chamber of Housing Commerce 156 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986,.City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One CONSIDERATION OF REINSTATEMENT OF UNCHANGED PREL L:' A. Preliminary Plat Reinstatement/Blackhawk Acres, West of Blackhawk Road & Adjacent to Robin Lane, SE 1/4 of Sec. 17 --The Rezoning from R4 to R3 of a 5.5 acre parcel and the replat of Blackhawk Acres was approved at the July 5, 1983 City Council meet- ing. This preliminary plat was not processed for final plat approval and according to the ordinance after one (1) year the preliminary plat is no longer a valid plat. Please r fer to a copy of the July 5, 1983, minutes found on pages through The • owners, Herb and Terry Bergstrom, have requested in a letter dated February 23, and enclosed on page L(,0 , that the preliminary plat be reinstated. According to the City Planner there are no, changes to the preliminary platy a reinstatement can be acted on by the City Council. Any changes to the preliminary plat would require action at a public hearing by the Advisory Planning Commission. To date, the owners have indicated there are no changes to the Blackhawk Acres plat as approved in 1983. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rein- statement of the Blackhawk Acres Preliminary Plat as granted at the July 5, 1983, meeting. SPECIAL NOTE: Any City Council members who would like a copy of the original report and support data for the Blackhawk Acres Plat, please contact this office, and copies will be made available as a part of the Administrative Packet. • 1�7 ,,. moi' c,t Jt� Council Minutes July 5, 1983 9. Subject to engineering recommendations for this phase. 10. Landscaping plans shall be submitted and approved at the time each building permit application is submitted. 11. A trail shall be installed at the developer's expense along. Dodd Road and Wilderness Run Road according to City standards. Those in favor were Thomas, Smith-' and Egan; those against were Blomquist and Wachter. SEE PLAT FILE BLACRHAWK ACRES - REZONL'iG AND PRELLMINARY PLAT 40 The application of Mr. Herbert Bergstrom for rezoning from R-4 to R-3 of 5.5 acres and replat of Blackhawk Acres was next brought before the Council. Mr. Bergstrom was present as was Brad Swenson, Engineer. The Planning Commis- sion, at its meeting do June 28, 1983 recommended approval subject to certain stipulations. Mr. Swenson explained there was a problem with development because of several easements including the easement granted to the City for the storm sewer outlet from Blackhawk Lake. The plan is to down -zone the property from R-4 to -H-3. Neighbors to the east who appeared at the Planning =! Commission meeting expressed concerns about elevation, preservation of large -> oak trees and other issues. He also stated that the easement for roadway has eliminated the development on a portion of the property and that the developer has now shifted the design and moved the buildings further from the single family dwellings to the east. The request was to rezone the entire site. Mr. Bergstrom stated that the developer cannot guarantee a minimum $90,000.00 value for each unit because no specific builder has been acquired at the present time. Thomas moved, Egan seconded the motion to approve the applica- tion .for rezoning from R-4 to R-3. All voted in favor. Egan moved, Wachter seconded the motion to approve the application for .preliminary plat with the following conditions: 1. A development agreement shall be entered into between the City and the applicant prior to final plat approval. 2. The townhouse association including the articles, bylaws, and re- strictions shall be reviewed by City staff prior to final plat. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and an adquate landscape bond shall be required and not released until one year after the landscaping has been completed, including the landscaping along the east boundary border- ing the single family homes and also the oak tree on the site shall be pre- served; further, that the neighbors will review the landscape plan when it has been completed. 4. The parking areas shall be blacktop surface and concrete curbing shall be provided around the perimeters of the parking area. / �12 Council Minutes W, 191 July 5, 1983 5. Robin Lane shall be upgraded with this development proposal. 6. All easements shall be dedicated as requested by City staff. 7. A detailed erosion control/grading plan shall be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 8. A variance shall be granted for the south private drive to exceed the 84A maximum grade if the grade cannot be flattened when the final grade for Robin Lane has been established. 9. If installed privately, utilities and street plans and specifica- tions shall be prepared by a registered engineer and submitted for approval by staff. 10. The proposed private drives shall be 24 feet wide with concrete curbing and bituminous surfacing. 11. The parking stalls shall be constructed according to City Code. 12. Access to Lots 1 and 2, Blocks 4 and 5, shall be removed from Robin Lane and directed to the internal private drive, but such access shall be reviewed by the staff. 13. The permanent and temporary easement right-of-way for the realign- ment portion of Robin Lane which previously has not been dedicated shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat and shall be 60 feet wide. 14. Site distance drawings shall be included with the development agree- ment to reflect the site distances. All voted yes. 169 R 83-43 SEE PLAT FILE February 23, 1986 Mr. Dale C. Runkle City Planner Clty of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Subject: Preliminary Plat Re -instatement Blackhawk Acres, Lots 7-12 Dear Mr. Runkle, Per ycnir conversation with Dave Keller today, I believe that you are aware that we have finally had some interest in the above property from a potential buyer/developer. As you may ® already know, the enormous assessments levied against this property (because of trunk sewer and street completion) have devalued it and created as adverse interest to potential buyers. This has caused undue delay and hardship in selling the property. kHowever, we have recently come to a tentative agreement based on preliminary plat approval and now the plat originally approved has expired. We request re -instatement of the preliminary plat exactly as is so that we may provide that which is necessary to sell the property. Your cooperation in expediting the procedure to approval would be greatly appreciated. The interested buyer would like to have a building up as a model by late spring. Therefore, a final plat approval would be sought soon after closing. Pending your agreement with re -instatement of the preliminary plat, if it is necessary to send it back through City Council, March 4th would be very beneficial over a later ® date. We would be grateful for this consideration. Best regards, Herb arZry Bergstrom Owners, Blackhawk Acres, Lots 7-12 X60 Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two CONTRACT 86-5, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT B. Contract 86-5, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions') --At 10':30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities for Contract 86-5 (Windtree 5th & 6th Additions). Enclosed on page /(oy is a tabulation of all bids received showing the comparison of the low bid to the engineer's estimate and the feasibility report estimate presented at the public hearing held on January 21, 1986. All final bids will be checked for accuracy in their extensions and additions and a formal recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the meeting on March 19. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-5 (Windtree 5th and 6th Additions) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. • J Our File No. 49373 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-5 WINDTREE 5TH b 6TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 462 EAGAN. MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS 1• Richard Knutson 2. M. Danner 3. F. F. Jedlicki 4. 0 & P Construction 5. Northdale Constr. 6. Annandale S & W 7. J.P. Norex 8• M & M Sewer & Water 9• Encon Utilities 10. Gartzke Constr. 11. Lake Area Utility 12• L & G Rehbein 13. S.M. Hentges UNDER ENGR EST---- % UNDER FEAS. REPORT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE - 3919d FEASIBILITY REPORT -- /G v BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, March 14, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $237,271.30 237,969.50 240.942.00 252.320.65 253.611.75 254 069.69 257.301.11 264.351.25 267.279.50 270.514.50 274.102.60 705a'is nn 300.621.75 ------12.1/ ------16.8% .$270,000.00 —285,100.00 • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three CONTRACT 86-7, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONTRACT C. Contract 86-7, Receive/Award Contract (O''Neil's Ponds Storm Sewer) --At 10:.30 a.m. on Friday, March 14, formal bids were received for the installation of a trunk storm sewer outlet for the pon located on the Robert J. O'Neil property. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received showing a comparison of the low bid to the engineer's estimat and the feasibility report estimate presented at the public hearing held on December 3, 1985. All bids will be checked for accuracy •in their extensions and additions and a formal recommendation will be provided at the March 19 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-7 (O'Neil's Ponds Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. /� 5 Our File No. 49356 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-7 O'NEIL'S PONDS (DP - 4, DP - 5, & DP - 10 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACTORS 1. Northdale Construction • 2. Richard Knutson 3. Arcon Construction 4. Crossings, Inc. 5. 0 & P Contracting 6. Barbarossa & Sons 7. Lake Area Construction 8. S.M. Hentges 9, Encon 10.0/M Barry Constr. PROJECT No. 443 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C..S.T. BID DATE: Friday. March 14. 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $216.016.25 236.458.00 239,553.90 257.762.00 263,512.33 _ 267.272.50 - 274,299.40 281.740.87 283908.00 _ 296,584.00 UNDER FEAS. REPORT --------------------------------------- 27.7% UNDER ENCR EST ------------------------------------------- 25.5% _...__...._._._..___...._. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ------------- --------------------$290,000.00 FEASIBILITY REPORT ------------------------------------ 298,800.00 /a �z 3912d • Agenda Information Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four APPROVE FINAL PLAT/BRITTANY 9TH ADDITION D. Approve Final Plat, Biittany 9th Addition (Tollefson Builders) -- We have received an application for final plat approval for the Brittany 9th Addition as submitted by Tollef,son Builders Incorporated. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval by Council action on April 17, 1984. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for consideration by Council action. Enclosed on page is a copy of the proposed final plat which conforms with the pproved preliminary plat. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS final plat for Brittany 9th Mayor and City Clerk to execute ITEM: To approve/deny/continue Addition and if approved, authorize all related documents. /� J BRITTANY 9"T" ADDITION . I r®, n l.m xorY, IW ar Y rr _. �• W Ybr u r . r.r �. r_...I�w. .. Yo r..r r.•..� N W nu_y.�YW YYrr, .r.rw b - ... __ yewTlY SiNyiW�.MYL facWO`... Yrr..: YrnrF _ _ Y YInYI T •Yrll. W N Wr VN YI MNW F.Y rMY a � IrY i Ill�r 1• r: r_u��•rr�l W Yli W u. Yruu •x wax u in r rW rlu 1. Mrbr i . lur Yrrr• WI. r �. LrrIwYN.,.r. iwr�Ir�W141u1Yw:611WWomYxrx.urlruYN.ru_� 1opiN ura,NnaTN{SBRINq'Mdl'lrraa{.iia.n,a.iir�l 1.1 '•Yn4` I jw;i �i3r 1 ill 6 rl�t11 y II N! II ., Yi9 ki I ... r.. Y, .r .u�. r .._ I iitiVt 3 I� t�ti�Y� �, tit{ ��il� Fil; rYl� fi en lr- J� Y II fYN_ YAf- !�1 '1 A a rr rwrY r 1\�Y r i�•r •nom �r�•i.T.�.-�Tli' Y•(.i-'h � s,Y tR s ! u �• 1 .3R2�1°iii l � ' , fli r^. � 14 i !I I ptirl�� slYx.w 1. louw wwr �� .I. ,ii�, r � �� II la rt�,i;�,i�T�r.h�NaIC•Nm�..:�:: ��.:' ' I Y YI � j: t l! w-' • s8 ih�V' Abp r j! �B , � it ,l � . n •�I.•.r� ln-c..— x. i.3"._=Van rrl�.nr. rNrwalmn .N .. I4tll anl'~�E�/V �1 `EE 5\•'� h� •I IJ rr_Ir_rr_rrrm^w`��':•rr.w.r 1.+... n.u. an_ru. r. rrn�+•r• Y i%j plr'S}'y�l�A}:'/IirNx �u �4i �7 .•__..�. r �.w`.I _.� iVy>. :v,1 2. 111i'/ x✓. t .� �. � �.. r_r..r ..v n. • _ 'x' rm //� ��j V�•t _ 1 _ 13 i it li.lwr�_sl�'r°i�i..i :: ;✓::;.,`.I��:�:.�c`uili f f, >if 7 ,� . 6k1'17.4A11' °ce.eY__��•tl,Y _L ! i Y mn..�. .. �.. r .ter. n 6%!e Ao41 8*4 I w\ N „t li e1rW.. Ynrx ��~�f9 '^� _ � IIhry c ����N¢q0 �1•Yrnrrwxry rwrru�YlY-..- _ rN riYr4+NY Y..Y nr� .. 1 � \ [il4v.lEyy��b WYN rrY+Y uu r.u. 1 �—�+ Fur h.1 .IruY1\r1 \�1. 11114NIWYY y1FxI Wr 'MY Yn •r Yx wr �IYlrrr lr�. YY YYYrTM •II Wt1Y Rl41YA4C /WO UT\lR'! CM[MCMi �vCAIC IN iCCi Gi1NG 1OiCET, LL•-~••••• • rr•r•rr. u. •� _w �f �� •V[YOT[Y IR 111Gi M ONNNCNT SET INM1O,N\NO 4-. ..ri 41111•Wllrr_YWIrY1M1r YN1Y 1]II��YIV ANO fAPiO`N(TN MN.RC4 NO.7SET AO]O\N1N4 AlC \ �� 1T RECT I\ 1 ANO ELf U N YNM +. r 1r • V[NOT691O0. MONUMCNT i0UN0 lO1 xONWr. All lOT I%U1NLI UMCt%%ESIMNE NI$ 7NOYN OY TNC fIYT 11•u 1 `�r IN •IIIr1 •I IN,r W r Y ra.Y u Q��b MM •y +_O[NOTCl AVEaOT�IDUa jYpR[lNl( Wt� i ,U irld }r r AT T%% kuxoelAi Tof NltF b ]I�Ia 4814 a, TOt SO\TN\S MTTYQK%9 "us 0, %%KR,, NC Oi v. LINO N I _ ,r kIUCO.TNEc Vlv CY..\L AfWN{0 114[O\!N[0.NOOD MAY. tb a[A]l SCM x•N"[ a,N.{IW.N .YY.Id (N.4 V.b.liUl iEN4R fwa--I-541 Agenda Informat-ion Memo March 19, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five CONTRACT 86-4, APPROVE PLANS/AUTHORIZE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS E. Contract 86-4, Approve Plans/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Brittany 9th Addition) --On November 19, 1985, the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed Brittany 9th Addition was approved as a result of the public hearing process. Subsequently, the Council authorized the appropriation of detailed plans and specifications which have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their review and considera- tion of authorizing an advertisement for bid solicitations. The Public. Works Director and Consultant Engineer will be available to d-iscuss these plans in detail at the March '19 meeting, if .necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve for Contract 86-4 (Brittany 9th Addition Streets and authorize advertisement for a bid opening 10:30 a.m, on Thursday, May 1, 1986. the plans and Utilities) to be held at