06/03/1986 - City Council RegularADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 3, 1986
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Approve Grading Permit #EX22-066 (St. John Neumann
Church)
Item 2. Approve Final Plat, Yorkton Industrial Park South
Addition
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR S CITY COUNCILMSMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 2, 1986
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Approve Grading Permit #EX22-066 (St. John Neumann Church) --
We have received an application for a grading permit from St.
John Newman Church to expand their existing parking lot north
towards Deerwood Drive. The excess material generated from this
grading operation will be used by a subcontractor to the City's
contract for upgrading of Deerwood Drive from Pilot Knob Road to
I -35E. All application materials have been submitted, ,reviewed
by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve grading permit
#EX22-066 (St. John Newman Church).
2. Approve Final Plat, Yorktown Industrial Park South Addition --
We have received an application for final plat approval for the
above referenced subdivision located between TH14'9 and Delaware
Trail (County Road 63), south of Becker Road (old County Road
63A) as shown on page * 'This proposed final plat has
complied with all the conditions and configuration of the
preliminary plat approved by Council action on December 3; 1985.
All final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed
by staff a•nd found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Yorktown Industrial Park South Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
City Administrator
TLH/mc
Special Note: Will be available at Council meeting on Tuesday.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN., MINNESOTA
CITY HALL.
JUNE 3, 1986
6:30 P.M.
p I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
J
.�,.1 II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - ESTABLISH BOND SALE DATE FOR $4,650,000 G.O.'IMPROVEMENT BONDS,
$3,000,000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID BONDS AND $700,000 TAX INCREMENT
BONDS OF 1986
IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
T/I - A. Cable Commission
v. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
rP13 A. Contractor Licenses
IG, B. Personnel Items
p•1e C. Eagan Lions Club, Temporary Beer License for 4th of July
/ Celebration
P.ZaD. Fawn Ridge Addition, Revise Agreement/Extend Completion Dates
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
�•1� A. Vacation of Common Lot Line Utility and Drainage Easement of
Outlot F, Lone Oak Addition (Continued from May 6, 1986, City
Council Meeting)
Z3 B. Vacation of Street and Utility Easements for Eagandale Lemay
Lake Addition
`.'. L5 C. Vacation of Highway' Slope Easement for Lot 10, Block 3,
Clearview Addition
VII. OLD BUSINESS
PZ A. James Unker for a 25' Variance from 50' Setback Requirement Along Public Street for Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition,
Located East of Lenore Lane & Fronting on Cliff Road, SE 1/4 of
Section 29
VIII. NEN BUSINESS
$ P A. Department of Natural Resources for Request for Special Deer Hunt in Fort Snelling State Park, November 8 and 9,7-9-8-6,�and
November 15 and 16, 1986
P.B. Home Estates, Inc. for a 20' Variance from 40' Setback Require-
ment Along Public Street for Lot 2, Block 1, Whispering Woods
Located at Slater Road & Slater Court, SW 1/4 of Section 31
NEN BUSINESS (continued)
P,q% C. Sunshine Construction Company for a 5' Sideyard Setback Variance
for Lot 6, Block 2, Birch Park Located at Windcrest Avenue West
of Denmark Avenue, NW 1/4 of Section 22
D. RMC Development Corporation, for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition Located
South of Diffley Road on Deer Hills Trail, NW 1/4 of Section 29.
P. E. RMC Development Corporation for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 3, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition, Located
South of Diffley Road on Deer Hills Trail, NW 1/4 of Section 29
'P. D F. Developers Escrow Agreement
p.(,t G. Discuss Future.Status of Developers Task Force
(rj H. Resolution/Dakota County Notification of Proposed Land Divisions
I%. ADDITIONALITEMS
�p
67 A. Public Improvement Contracts
1 �p 67 1. Contract 86-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Pumphouse #8)
1672. Contract 86-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Hampton Heights
/ Trunk Watermain)
p.76 3. Contract 86-11, Approve Plans/Order Adveertisement for Bids
(Williams/LaRue and Wyndham Corporate Center Additions)
P- 4. Contract 86-8, 1986 Sealcoating
f7, 7y B. Contract 85-21, Maintenance Facility Expansion/Revised Concept
Design Approval
p.73 C. City of Eagan, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Base Radio
Communications Stations and Installation)
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
%I. ADJOURNKENT.
2
a
MEMO TO: HONORABLEMAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 29, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT:AGENDA APPROVE -'MINUTES'
After approval is given to the June 3, 1986, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the May 21 meeting and Special
City Council meeting minutes for April 29, the following items
are in order for consideration:
At a Special City -Council meeting held on April 9, 1986, the
City Administrator and Director of Finance reviewed the necessity
to sell bonds prior to September 1, at which time many General
Obligation Bonds will become taxable according to HR 3838. A
sale date of July 1, 1986, was generally discussed at the Special
City Council meeting. It was also determined that all three
issues would be combined for the same sale date to allow for
a savings in preparation of the bond perspectus and issuance
expenses even though the three bond issues must be treated as
three separate sales. For additional information on this item,
refer to sale memos prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financial,
Inc., that provide detailed information describing each of the
proposed bond sales. This information is enclosed on pages Z,
through_. Mr. Ernie Clark, the City's Fiscal Consultant
from Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., will be present to answer
any questions the City Council might have regarding the three
sales. The sale date is July 1, with a bid opening at 11:00
and the bid award scheduled for 6:30 p.m. which is the first
regularly scheduled City Council meeting during the month of
July.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To schedule a bond sale
date for July 1, 1986, at which time bids will be opened and
award considered for the sale of $4,650,00.0 G.O. improvement
bonds, $3,000,000 Municipal State Aid bonds and $700,000 TIF
bonds for 1986.
II
I/ - -. , t -
C
Tull Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Tull Free Ocher States (800) 328-6122
er & Schroeder F acial, Inc.
Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South-P.O., Box 789 • M inneapol is, Minnesota 55440 (612) 831-1500
SALE MEMO
TO: Mr. Stephen Rosholt
Faegre cic Benson
2300 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
FROM: Ernest L. Clark
ISSUE:
INITIAL
RESOLUTION
SALE DATE:
BONDS DATED:
BONDS DUE:
INTEREST
PAYMENT DATE:
MATURITIES:
May 19, 1986
City of Eagan, Minnesota
$3,000,000 General Obligation State -Aid Road Bonds, Series
1986
June 3, 1986, regular council meeting, 6:30 p.m.
I
July /, 1986 open bids at 11:00 a.m. C.D.T,
Award regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. C.D.T.
July 1, 1986
July 1
January 1 and July 1, commencing July 1, 1987
$ 150,000
- 1987
160,000
- 1988
170,000
- 1989
180,000
- 1990
190,000
- 1991
205,000
- 1992
220,000
- 1993
235,000
- 1994
250,000
- 1995
265,000
- 1996
275,000
- 1997 -
175,000
- 1998/01
C.D.T.
and tabulate.
REDEMPTION: The issuer may elect on July 1, 1996 to repay obligations due on
or after July 1, 1997/01. All prepayments shall be at a price of
par and accrued interest.
HcaJyuarrtm Minncatx,li., Minncwra
Bninch Offi... S.. Lira Ikach,("iI mia•5r.Pahl,Minnc.uW•Mi1w.wkcc, Wiuvnsln•Sen Fnmciscu. Cakf,,mia
.,,,i..,.ni,.Y........ . e,.—•, n.....—� .
RATES:
DISCOUNT:
FUNDS:
GOOD FAITH
CHECK:
REGISTRAR:
PROJECT:
APPLICATION
FUNDS:
The rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100ths or 1/8th of
1%. No rate or maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any
subsequent maturity by more than 1%. Obligations of the same
maturities shall bear a simple rate from the date of the
obligations to -the date of maturity.
$52,500
Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds, not
Clearing House funds.
$60,000 cashier's or certified check payable to the City.
First Trust Company, Inc.
State -Aid Roads Project
Construction Costs
Discount
Issuance Costs
Interest Earnings
TOTAL:
M
$2,922,000
52,500
27,000
(1,500)
3 000 000
ti
v II 5555555955515 ra ry Iy II F-
U II In L) h1 111 0 Irl F. r5 N 'Si N N II r -.I
II 11 -
> If r OJ Ill SU W [U IP Il) 5 G1 lil ID N 9 4s: it If I
- II CO ul Ul rU Cti Ir:J r In u) f9 r OJ N 51111 II
N II N f•)U7 Ln :. .-:m OJ Ij ill i4,l It Irl
II iUInrmmIII ulmmm= f•l•-+mr 11 I11
i+ II 1•) I•l rl r•) 1•) 4 4 t �t t t OJ .a Ln rn II r
.O II f•l 6 r7 M I•) I•) r•) f•] f•] r+J I•] i.J OJ II h)
aJ II 11
L' II II v
II
II
II
++
If 69995559615595195 11 5
N It II) 4) N h) h) to 4c & 5 Is 55995 1! 5
W II II
N II CO W LI) 111+; LDLD r m.5 M 11) V1595 II U)
tU )rN99N II -+
II lJ fIn
1•�-r +-1 �J V7 m .+ .� m 4 iJ NU] (U II V)
`i111It WU-)ra1OrrurSmfiuim�-4 m
mr1.u0d f•) 70.-1 Ln rD u)41•) CII ..1 II r
,..,, a In
n .
11
II
II
II
11
II
ti II -5)995595 N5 5 r'11
al 01 C
W .1= ❑0
4i ra
i4
111 4, u
sL
In a n
1n m
-
Y 1L
Y
a,
Ln
5 5 5 64
G II 61695511155 h) 51IF, ty I� Nr'.
n II rIs, 4'If tiz I- in --III v u'r n,r ¢I
II
II 4 h) L) 61 li] h1 n; rD ui ll1 lO.,D u. rr
I-) It
II 5 9 9 9 5 5 51 5 51 5 9 5 N N N II 5
ra II 5 5 5 r5 5 N ti N F. &, j .1, S S ti II N
II
11 5556154N95IS, F F�!y IF,, Fy ti 11 IS
U II 6455 N55 N 455995?: ry II 151
S. II ry 9595 N 1G IS, Is 646411, r.. 4c 4I, II 9
If .. - II
L II 9 5 5 5 5 I17 5 4) IS 11) U.) n) bi Li; h.: II 6'
a II II) U) rm In 5Cu 104"lwrr-Irrr II 5
-1 ,i ti " N 44J Ilj r1J Ill I)j I,i r-4 ,-1 .I .. : It f;J
u
It11 r7
II
II
a1 11 t- (30 IT) (9 N1•)•J V1mrmCr- 5-+ II
Y II mmmUi Ln Cn Cn Ln n+Cn Cn
6 S
Cn, rn ' II
rG II \\\\\\\\\�.\ \�\\ II w
II J
!995559 ry 54GIS, 5 r5 R,Iy n. If Q
If I-
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrran
II I
•
I
tA
II
4:'
11 111
U 41,
N f.I rI
ill
j I, Y II
n,'l'i4 a
> I'l fl al LTI
4
T.1 d 4 14t'
Cl L ++
IL r-4 m Ili 5'7
n ru
4 N ri II rG
It N i . U
++ 0 m Ll G: N
> I— > .�
F- U
IL CC Q
E
i
Ir
L;J
I
I
r4
Tull Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122
n r c el
Inc.
Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes- Avenue Sourh • P.O. Box 789 -Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440(612)831-1500
May 19, 1986
SALE MEMO
TO: Mr. Stephen Rosholt
Faegre h Benson
2300 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
FROM: Ernest L. Clark
ISSUE: City of Eagan, Minnesota
$700,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986
INITIAL
RESOLUTION: June 3, 1986, regular council meeting, 6:30 p:m. C.D.T.
1
SALE DATE: July /, 1986 open bids at 11:00 a.m. C.D.T. and tabulate.
Award regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. C.D.T.
BONDS DATED: July 1, 1986
BONDS DUE: August 1
INTEREST
PAYMENT DATE: February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 1987
MATURITIES: $ 40,000 - 1989
120,000 - 1990
125,000 - 1991
130,000 - 1992
140,000 - 1993
145,000 - 1994
REDEMPTION: Bonds due in 1989 callable at 102
Bonds due in 1990 callable at 101.5
Bonds due in 1991, callable at 101
Bonds due in 1992 callable at 100.5
,Bonds due in 1993/94 callable at 100
RATES: The rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100ths or 1/8th of
1%. No rate or maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any
subsequent maturity by more than 1%. Obligations of the same
maturities shall bear a simple rate from the date of the
obligations to the date of maturity.
Hca.l.pnrrtcrs: Minncapoli.c, Minncwra
Pr:mch li((itts: Srdun.i Ik.ah, Cali4,mi.r • Si.
NO, Minncxrta • Milw,mkm W ieuoos in • San F,m.,k r. Cahfi,m n
>I.mhv.n Jw \4mm.lmoinr l'nn.aom r..np: ......
C
DISCOUNT:
$10,500
FUNDS:
Bond proceeds must be in immediately
available funds, not
Clearing House -Funds.
GOOD FAITH
CHECK:
$14,000 certified or cashier's check payable
to the City.
REGISTRAR:
First Trust Company, Inc.
PROJECT:
Sperry Project
APPLICATION
FUNDS:
Construction Costs
$ 622,482.
Discount
10,500
Capitalized Interest (1.5 years)
63,555
Issuance Costs
7,000
Interest Earnings
(3,537)
Is
TOTAL:
700,000
I
Exhibit Al
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Tax Increment Cashflow
Using 50% of Revenue
50% Debt Semi -Annual Excess
Date T.I. Revenue Service Balance Revenue
8/
1/87
43,485.00 *
43,485.00
.00
.00
2/
1/88
20,070.00 *
20,070.00
.00
.00
8/
1/88
50,000.00
20,070.00
29,930.00
29,930.00
2/
1/89
50,,000.00
20,070.00
29,930.00
59,860.00
8/
1/89
100,000.00
60,070.00
39,930,.00
99,790.00
2/
1/90
100,000.00
19,030.00
80,970.00
180,760.00
8/
1/90
100,000.00
139,030.00
( 39,030.00)
141,730.00
2/
1/91
100,000.00
15,790.00
84,210.00
225,940.00
e/
1/91
100,000.00
140,790.00
( 40,790.00)
185,150.00
2/
1/92
100,000.00
12,290.00
87,710.00
272.,860.00
8/
1/92
100,000.00
142,290.00
( 42,290.00)
230,570.00
2/
1/93
100,000.00
8,552.50
91.,447.50
322,017.50
8/
1/93
100,000.00
148,552.50
( 48,552.50)
273,465.00
2/
1/94
100.,000.00
4,422.50
95,577.50
369,042.50
8/
1/94
100,000.00
-------------------------------------�-------
149,422.50
( 49,422.50)
319,620.00
11263,555.00
943,935.00
319 620.00
* denotes capitalized interest of 63,555.00
Prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financial:
7
5/20/1986
40
•
Issue Date:
Settlement Date:
First Coupon:
a
$700,000 Tax Increment Bonds of 1986
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Debt Service Schedule
7/01/86
8/01/86
8/01/87
Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service
8/01/87
0.00
0.000
43,485.00
43,485.00
2/01/88
0.00
0.000
20,070.00
20,070.00
8/01/88
0.00
0.000
20,070'.00
20,070.00
2/01/89
0.00
0.000
20,070.00
20,070.00
8/01/89
40,000.00
5.200
20,070.00
60,070.00
2/01/90
0.00
0.000
19,030.00
19,030.00
8/01/90
120,000.00
5.400
19,030.00
139,030.00
2/01/91
0.00
0.000
15,790.00
15,790.00
8/01/91
125,000.00
5.600
15,790.00
140,790.00
2/01/92
0.00
0.000
12,290.00
12,290.00
8/01/92
130,000.00
5.750
12,290.00
142,290.00
0.00
0.000
8,552.50
8,552.50
®2/01/93
8/01/93
140,000.00
5.900
8,552.50
148,552.50
2/01/94
0.00
0.000
4,422.50
4,422.50
8/01/94
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
145,000.00
6.100
4,422.50
149,422.50
TOTALS 700,000.00 243,935.00
Accrued Interest to 8/01/86 = 3,345.00
Total Bond Years = 4203.
Gross Interest Cost = $ 243,935.00
Average Coupon 5.803%
NIC = 6.053%
Average Life = 6.00 Years
Discount @ 98.500 10,500.00
•
File: e4.dbt
Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 5/19/86
943,935.00
Tull Free Minnesuta (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328.6122
', er &Schroeder FinancW, -ffic.
Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South • P.O. Box 789 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 (612) 831-1500
May 23, 1986
SALE MEMO
TO: Mr. Stephen Rosholt
Faegre & Benson
2300 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth'Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
FROM:
ISSUE:
INITIAL
RESOLUTION:
SALE DATE:
BONDS DATED:
BONDS DUE:
INTEREST
PAYMENT DATE:
MATURITIES:
Ernest L. Clark
City of Eagan, Minnesota
$4,650,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series
1986-A
June 3, 1986, regular council meeting, 6:30 p.m., C.D.T.
1
July z', 1986 open bids at 11:00 a.m. C.D.T. and tabulate.
Award Regular Meeting at 6:30 p.m. C.D.T.
July 1, 1986
December 1
June 1 and December 1 commencing June 1,.1987
$ 50,000.00
- 1987
500,000.00
- 1988
500,000.00
- 1989
500,000.00
- 1990
500,000.00
- 1991
500,000.00
- 1992
300,000.00
- 1993
300,000.00
- 1994
300,000.00
— 1995
300,000.00
- 1996
260,000.00
- 1997
130,000.00
- 1998
130,000.00
- 1999
130,000.00
- 2000
130,000.00
- 2001
120,000.00
- 2002
9
Head.piarrvr: Alinnearyilis, Minncsai ra
Paanch CMico:Sd:na 1"ch, C,hf,,.i.-Si. Paul; Minn (.-Md...kee. Wi.,nsm•Sm Frncixn, Calilamia
is
171
•
REDEMPTION: The issuer may elect on December 1, 1992 to repay obliga—
tions due on or after December 1, 1993. All prepayments
shall be at a price of par and accrued interest.
RATES: The rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100ths or
1/8th of 19. No rate or, maturity shall exceed the rate
specified for any subsequent maturity by more than 1%.
Obligations of the same maturities shall bear a simple
rate from the date of the obligations to the date of ma—
turity.
DISCOUNT: $88,350
FUNDS: Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds, not
Clearing House funds.
GOOD FAITH
CHECK: $93,000 cashier's or certified check payable to the City.
REGISTRAR: First Trust Company, Inc.
PROJECT: Sewer, Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Street Improvements.
APPLICATION
FUNDS: Construction Costs: $3,576,923
307 Contingency Cost: $1,073,077
TOTAL: $4,650,000
$4,650,000 City of'Eagan, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1986, Series A
Debt Service Schedule
Issue Date: 7/01/86
Settlement Date: 8/01/86
First Coupon: 6/01/87
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Debt Service
12/01/87
50,000.00
4.900
385,744.17
435;744.17
12/01/88
500,000.00
5.100
269,840.00
769,840.00
12/01/89
500,000.00
5.200
244,340.00
744,340.00
12/01/90
500,000..00
5.400
218,340.00
718-,340.00
12/01/91
500,000.00
5.600
191,340.00
691,340.00
12/01/92
500,000.00
5.700
163,340.00
663,340.00
12/01/93
300,000.00
5.900
134,840.00
434,840.00
12/01/94
300,000.00
6.100
117,140.00
417,140.00
12/01/95
300,000.00
6.200
98,840.00
398,840.00
12/01/96
300,000.00
6.400
80,240,.-00
380;240:00
12/01/97
260,000.00
6.500
61,040.00
321,040.00
12/01/98
130,000.00
6.700
44,140.00
174,140.00
12/01/99
130,000.00
6.800
35,430.00
165,430.00
12/01/00
130,000.00
6.900
26,590.00
156,590.00
12/01/01
130,000.00
7.000
17,620.00
147,620.00
12/01/02
------------------------------------------------------------------
120,000.00
7.100
8,520.00
128,520.00
------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS
4,650,000.00
2,097,344.17
6,747,344.17
Accrued
Interest to 8/01/86
=
22,690.83
Total Bond Years = 33988.
Gross Interest Cost = $ 2,097,344.17
Average Coupon 6.171%
NIC = 6.431%
Average Life = 7.31 Years
Discount @ 98.100 88,350.00
File: eagan.dbt
Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 5/23/86
•
0
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
A. CABLE COMMISSION
1. Cable Commission Update --Ralph Campbell,
Cable Administrator will be present to answer
provide an update regarding any business that
conducted by the Cable Commission.
/Z
Burnsville/Eagan
any questions and
is currently being
Agenda In -formation
June 3, 1986, City
Page Three
Memo
Council Meeting
CONSENT.AGENDA:
There are four ( q") items. on the agenda referred to as
Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council.
If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda
and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required
is brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSES
A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page 1� is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained
as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to
reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references
from other municipalities or their client permit applications
are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
contractor licenses as presented.
15
To approve the list of
•
•
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
. JUNE 3, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
1. W. H. CATES CONSTRUCTION INC
2. CONCORD BUILDERS
3. FULLERTON LUMBER COMPANY
4. E.E. JONES INC
5. NELSON—JOHNSON BUILDERS
6. WESTWOOD REALTY & CONSTRUCTION INC
HOMEOWNER
1. KRAEMER, GARY
1. AL'S HTG & A/C
2. LAKEVILLE PLBG. & HTG INC
• PLUMING
1. ABRAHAMSON PLBG
2. COLLEGE CITY PLUMBING
3. KLAMM MECHANICAL
4. STAR PLUMBING
WATER SOFTENER
1. MILBERT COMPANY
7.�1.1.1o; „
1. DOLPHIN POOL & PATIO
1
W
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Four
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
The following are Personnel Items to be considered at the June
3, 1986 City Council meeting:
Item 1, Forestry Aide (Seasonal) --It is the recommendation of
Park Superintendent VonDeLinde that Dave G. Wills be hired to
fill this seasonal position.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Dave G. Wills as a Seasonal Forestry Aide.
Item 2, Seasonal Road Maintenance Workers --It is therecommenda-
tion of Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart that Clayton
Pearson, Mike Shomion, John Robinson, Kelly Ramswick, Susan
Lindblade and Bryce Johnson be hired to fill these seasonal
positions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Clayton Pearson, Mike Shomion, John Robinson, Kelly Ramswick,
Susan Lindblade and Bryce Johnson as Seasonal Road Maintenance
Workers.
Item 3, Engineering Tech Intern/Assistant--It is the recommendation
of Assistant City Engineer Hefti that Jill Pennie be hired to
fill the temporary 6 month internship position in the Engineering
• Division. Ms_ Pennie is a Civil Engineering student at the
University of Minnesota.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Jill Pennie as an Engineering Tech Intern /Assistant (temporary
position) in the Engineering Division.
Item 4, Road Maintenance Worker --With the resignation/retirement
of Robert Shockley, a vacancy was created in the Road Maintenance
Division of the Public Works Department. It is the recommendation
of Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart, Street Supervisor
Lundsten and Administrative Assistant Duffy that Kurt Schlegel
be hired to fill this vacancy,- effective June 9 and contingent
upon successful completion of the City's physical examination
requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Kurt Schlegel as a Road Maintenance Worker, effective June
9, 1986 and contingent upon, successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
/-d
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Five
Memo
Council Meeting
Personnel Items cont"d.
Item 5, Seasonal Recreation Workers --It is the recommendation
of Recreation Supervisor Peterson and Recreation Supervisor Sunder
that the persons listed on the attachment, which is enclosed
on page -_/7 for you reference, be hired as Seasonal Recreation
Workers.
ACTION
orkers.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
of the listed persons as Seasonal Recreation Leaders.'
/6
the hiring
•
•
BE: SUMMER PLAYGROUND PERSONNEL
I "13003 C404 III)v off -.1 4
Janelle Bonner
Kristi Edlund
Kathleen Fletcher
Tricia Gilbertson
Rachelle Jirik
Chris Kirschner
Lisa Lundquist
Gina Penn
Beth Sistowicz
Jacki Sadek
Tammy Sova
• Kathy Weeklund
Kris Weeklund
PS/js
NEW PERSONNEL
Ben Anderson
Lisa Carlisano
Jodi Carlson
Shelley Carroll
Paula Eaves
Justine Epple
Julie Erickson
Anne Frisbee
Leah Halepeska
Dawn Peterson
Christine Schultz
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Six
EAGAN LIONS CLUB, TEMPORARY BEER LICENSE
C. Eagans Lions Club, Temporary Beer License for 4th of July
Celebration --The Eagan Lions Club has made application for a
temporary beer license for July 2-6 in connection with the annual
4th of July celebration. The Police Department has reviewed
the application and finds the license application to be in order
for review. For a copy of the on -sale beer license, refer to
page /�
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a temporary
beer license for the 4th of July Celebration as requested by
• the Lions Club.
•,
TOTAL FEE IS,00 CITY OF EAGAN NEW
RECEIPT NO. 62778 3830 Pilot Knob Road RENEWAL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122
PREPARE IN DUPLICATE
LICENSE NO.
APPLICATION FOR NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE
PLEASE PRINT . DATEN41��9
LAST FIRST MIDDLE MIDDLE
ADDRESS ADDRESS .41ptl
STREET
i
ADDRESS
STREET
TTY STATE ZIP
CITY STATE ZIP
PHONE O BII=TE
MANAGER'S NAME
LAST FIRST MIDDLE
ADDRESS
STATE ZIP
PhUN1; PHONE BIRTBDATE
PLEASE CHECK ------CN SALE_ OFF SALE
HEREBY APPLIES FOR NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE. YEAR FROM ee 7— -
TO EVENT- ��� m� L�E/e6�p�iOU - Month Date
Month Date
ARE YOU THE ACTUAL PROPRIETOR? YES ( ) NO (� LOCATION: R� Pa�
,` ADDRESS
ARE YOU THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE BUSINESS LOCATION? YES ( ) NO
HAS ANY OTHER LICENSE OF THIS KIND BEEN GRANTED TO YOU? YES NO ( ) WH ,C-,, 'A5
ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES? YES (k,/NO ( ) / Ci ,Year
ARE YOU A REGISTEREDVOTER? YES NO(')/CITY
r
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED? YES ( ) NO CITY
(Other than a.traffic.offense)
If joint amership or if a silent partnership is involved, specify complete names,
birth, addresses and telephone nunber for everyone concerned. YES ( ) NO (-4'
dates of
If YES, please list on the back or on separate sheet, all the information required.
I HEREBY VERIFY THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OR MANAGERS IN THE PAST YEAR.
THE LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD EAGAN HARMLESS Frm ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR
SUITS INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND CITHER DEMISE COST'S, WHICH THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR
BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANT OF THIS 3.2 BEER LICENSE.
I (we) HEREBY AGREE TO OPERATE SUCHSS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TETE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND
THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EAGAN. 7E FORE STATLMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ASID BELIEF.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE /,\ _ i)11A A,o h�
FOR CITY U ONL
POLICE APPROVAL: YES (e� NO ( ) SI( �D DATED
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES ( ) NO ( ) SIGNED DATED
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
FAWN RIDGE ADDITION, REVISE AGREEMENT/EXTEND COMPLETION DATES
D. Fawn Ridge Addition, Revise Agreement/Extend Completion Dates --
On July 17, 1984, the final plat was approved for the Fawn Ridge
development located in the southwest corner of Wilderness Run
Road and Dodd Road. As a part of that final plat approval, a
development agreement required that the installation of all required
streets and utilities be completed by December 5, 1985. Subsequent
to that final plat approval, the developer elected to develop
the subdivision in phases. Except for some minor corrective
work, the first phase substantially complied with the completion
dates contained within the development. agreement. However, due
to the fact that the development agreement did not anticipate
this phased development, it must now be amended to reflect the
future completion dates required by the second phase construction.
The staff has reviewed the developer's requested revised comple-
tion dates and have adjusted them accordingly. The Financial
Guarantee is still valid and in full force and effect to guaranty
the completion of this work to the new revised completion dates.
Staff is therefore recommending approval of this amendment to
the development agreement revising the completion dates.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment
to the development agreement for the Fawn Ridge Addition regarding
the extension of the completion dates for the installation of
public improvements.
ao
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eight
VACATION OF COMMON LOT LINE UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT
nTTTT_AM F T_nMV nAW DnnTTTnM
A. Vacation of Common Lot Line Utility and Drainage Easement
of Outlot F,, Lone Oak Addition --On March 4, a petition was received
from the developers of the Lone Oak Addition,requesting the vacation
of the •dedicated common lot line drainage and utility easements
adjacent to Trinity Lone Oak Church and shown on page with
the public hearing being scheduled for April 1.
One, of the conditions of the vacation of this easement was the
conveyance of a similar replacement easement over the new lot •
line created by the lot split for conveyance of property to Trinity
Lone Oak Church. At the April 1 meeting, the developer had not
complied with the rededication requirement and the public hearing
was subsequently continued until May 6. At the May 6 hearing,
the developer had still not complied with this dedication require-
ment and' the hearing was continued one final time to June 3.
As of this date the developer has successfully complied with
the new dedication requirements and the vacation is now in order
for favorable consideration. All notices have been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all concerned parties.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the vacation of the common lot line drainage and
utility easement over that portion of Outlot F as described in
the petition. •
y= -
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
FOR.
LAUKKA BECK EAGAN
Most N%yCa-Dutk4jF �,;t P. ,
J I
O
ZI
v
� � NB9•.Z4'44'E
is- 37
S00°9S�/G"E
E
C -Yl
•
I hwaby *WHY "us* lkcrcji4,4--Scojol,
rr Pnowad by ma of WMW my dkrat
OUMPASHM aM Mt 1 as a duly F"Uumd
WL FAIL na oma
BUN.
Mrs :�I r41.r..+ wurcu�
EASEME�J—1 TO
�/AGATED
4445
ION
- /D. 00 ft W/ciC G/ .> 1 n.��a I?
.I _ Utilit�E3sCu�/tt per a141;
�i /50.60
8902444"W �S'iy Lina Out/at F
s.�
zoo 0 1) 1)
SCALE IN FEET
•14 T7. 40011011. •OLCILLD. J1•111. 0.•0./1 INC.
!•M 1 411 IN TI 1T 1., MNNAML]LA N, 1411
NO' 6.840/ FIELD WOK, PAGE. I DRAWN 911: <_ L
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
VACATION OF STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE ADDITION
B. Vacation of Street and Utility Easements for 'Eagandale Lemay
Lake Addition --With the proposed development of the Eagandale
Lemay Lake 2nd Addition, the certain common lot line drainage
and utility easements dedicated with the First Addition must
be vacated.
While the original petition requested the vacation of a street
easement incorporating a portion of the existing Eagandale Place,
this is no longer necessary as the street easement was never
formally recorded at the County. Therefore, the only ease ent
• required to be vacated at the public hearing is shown on page.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected parties with no objections received
to date.
ACTION TO BE .CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To, close the public hearing
and approve the vacation of the common lot line drainage and
utility easement over a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale
Lemay Lake lst Addition.
.2-3
SKETCH FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE a UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION:
LOT I, BLOCK I, EAGANDALE
LEMAY LAKE IST ADDITION
LONE OAK ROADI Reviewed By: TAC
Date:
S
8038 1 3911 E 145.03 - •.
3 (
a m PROPOSED DRAINAGE
60 N Ki o I �. VACATION EASEMENT
141 rn
20 I rte' LJ
1 \.
2
L
M 1
z J
a w w L—
in A \ a- -I
W \ l! N
L�_'_c4 LL LJ
L jJ---
v $ I= Z
Ir
�\
1
r�
Lt �. \ 5
�f-
•L I
aD'\ r0 Iv i J
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT
VACATION IN BLOCK 1
DENOTES EASEMENT
The 5 foot wide Drainage and Utility El To BE VACATED
Easement as dedicated on the easterly
5 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, EAGANDALE LEMAY
LAKE 1ST ADDITION, according to the re-
corded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minne-
sota.
6-nnele I-sttnal Samrvcyitt g Znc.
9001 E. 81mmin0lon Freeway (35W)
Bloominglon. MN 55420
(912)$81.2455
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
VACATION OF HIGHWAY SLOPE EASEMENT
LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
C. Vacation of Highway Slope Easement for Lot 10, Block 3,
Clearview Addition --On May 6, the Council received a petition
to vacate a 2'5' highway slope easement that had been conveyed
to the City through a formal revocation process by Dakota County.
Enclosed on page o is a copy of the easement proposed to
be vacated. This easement was originally acquired by the County
Highway Department for the upgrading of Cliff Road to its present
urban condition. Because it is no longer needed, the County
agreed to revoke this easement to the City's jurisdiction with
the understanding that the City would proceed with the formal
vacation process so that it could revert to the original landowner.
All notices have published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all potentially interested parties with no objections received
to date.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the vacation of a 25'' 'highway easement across Lot
10, Block 3, Clearview Addition.
Legal Description of the
Property to be Vacated
A Highway Easement over the following described property;
The South 25 feet of Lot 10, Block 3, of the Clearview
Addition in Eagan described as follows:
Beginning at a point 50 feet north of the SE corner of the
SW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Section 29, T27N, R23W, thence west
187.56 feet, thence north 280 feet, thence east .189 feet,
thence south 280.01 feet to the point of beginning and there
`� �
terminating said true r ..e iaxel containing 4,689 square uare feet
or 0.108 acres more or less.
-- I Revio=TACEA ST 189.00 M stet
90.0 -%��an
9"
0
2
P.O.L.
PARCEL
f®f
25,200 Sq. Ff.
i 90.0
PP,�
fes.. J::::::. �:.: ,•: ; •. •..
? •o ..Jw_,. , c.1 y-.1-1.�
( CLIFF ROAD)
-N-
"=so
PIOPO.Id >'
M
L_I
3
Ln
No. 32 -
� 0
_
99.o —
s z �s
PARCEL
,
A
27,518 Sq.Ff. IW
1
Ix
I.
f
1 BIW
NI
N
F -• 0 1'•• �J
t
1�.
Y
•
• i4.2 - .
/
.tJ
�..
Y
_-
r=
L
PIOPO.Id >'
M
L_I
3
Ln
No. 32 -
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
OLD' BUSINESS'.
VARIANCE/JAMES UNKER
A. James Unker for a 25' Variance from 50' Setback Requirement
Along Public Street for Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition,
Located East of Lenore Lane & Fronting on Cliff Road, SE 1/4
of Section 29 --An application was submitted to the Planning
Department requesting a 25' front yard setback, north of Cliff
Road in the Clearview Addition. This item was presented for
consideration at the May 21 meeting, however, at the request
of the applicant the agenda item was continued until the June
• 3, City Council meeting. For additional information on this
item, refer to the Plannin9 Department report, a copy of which
is enclosed on pages through 131. There are no
conditions in the Clearview Addition development agreement pertain-
ing to setback restrictions on this lot.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance permit as requested by James Unker.
•
a7
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: JAMES UNKER
LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
(SE a, SECTION 29)
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 21, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 13, 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
A public hearing has been scheduled at the June 3, 1986, City
® Council meeting for the vacation of the -25' easement area.
The vacation will not affect this variance in any manner.
This lot has not been split, however, all setbacks meet City
Code requirements now and will if, the lot is split as proposed.
There are no conditions in the Clearview Addition Development
Agreement pertaining to setback restrictions on this lot.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all code require-
ments.
JS/jj
0•
V
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted
requesting a
•
25' front yard setback north of Cliff Road in
the Clearview
Addition.
COMMENTS: This one -acre+ lot abutts the Woodgate
2nd Addition
to the east and another acre+ lot to the west.
The applicant
wishes to construct a garage near Cliff Road for 3
main reasons.
1) This garage will visually shield Cliff Road from the existing
house thus, 2) maximizing the private area in the
front yard
and 3) create- a noise "buffer" from Cliff Road.
A letter from
the applicants detailing these hardships is attached for your
review. The neighbors to the west have a garage
30' from the
Cliff Road right-of-way- and the proposed garage
will be 25'
from the same right-of-way.
A public hearing has been scheduled at the June 3, 1986, City
® Council meeting for the vacation of the -25' easement area.
The vacation will not affect this variance in any manner.
This lot has not been split, however, all setbacks meet City
Code requirements now and will if, the lot is split as proposed.
There are no conditions in the Clearview Addition Development
Agreement pertaining to setback restrictions on this lot.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all code require-
ments.
JS/jj
0•
V
NU
0
SIGMA
SUF4VEVING
SERVICES
2wd V46�, 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway
Eagan. Minnesota 55122
Phone: (612), 452-3077
r �(
i_1 I \
\ EAST
r r'- 90.0
5�
I \�
I
—P.O.L.
` o I PARCEL
" 00 I
N I® I
25,200 Sq. Ff.
W;
Z I 90.o h
J I
z'I P.R.
♦i of ��/i -r � o
uj
� o
JI c
eA 5 1�
-• Zoo 00 T R s'� 90.0/
P.P. zs.z tfF
�I (CLIFF ROAD)
—N-
1
Lot Division Certificate For:
Mr. JIM UNKER
• •0
99.0 -
PARCEL
(_j
AI �;
r
LG
<1
27,518 Sq.Ff. IW
1
o r -
x
o
I«
GO
V
/1
I
a
la
C)
,
rlly
---DRIVEWAY _ IQ
�t
$EY,3ECVEMENT
A CV
1I
r o /ok.. FoQ pee
P can1��
r
t
I
—
rfrARea
11
'{' Is
L._.187.56
---- c _.b----
-
3
C.S.A.H. No.
32
April 23, 1986
Re: Application for Setback Variance
Lot 10, Block 3, Cedarview
Dear Mr. Runkle:
Enclosed is our application for a setback variance to allow a
detached garage to be built 25 feet from the south boundary of our
property at Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview, 1775 Cliff Road. This would
require a variance of either 25 or 50 feet depending on the status of
a 25 foot easement which Dakota County has agreed to revoke, and the
City of Eagan has agreed to vacate. Assuming the easement is vacated,
the variance would be 25 feet.
We are requesting the variancebecauseof hardships resulting from •
unusual characteristics of our property. The primary concern is the
high level of noise from traffic on Cliff Road. Our house is situated
near the rear of the lot to reduce the noise level, but noise is
still very bothersome. Locating the garage closer to Cliff Road will
increase the area that will be shielded from noise by the garage. It
will also decrease the area that will be subject to viewing from
Cliff Road, thereby increasing our privacy. Because the house is near
the rear of the lot, our primary yard area is between the house and
Cliff Road, so increasing privacy is very important. If we have to
locate the garage closer to the house, our usable yard area will be
greatly decreased.
The setback variance would not affect our neighborssince our
neighbors to the west, the Amundsons, have a garage that is about the
same distance to Cliff Road, 30.8 feet from their south lot line. Our •
neighbors to the east, in Woodgate, 2nd Addition are separated from
us by an outlot that is about 125 feet wide, our lot is barely
visible from their lots, and their lots face away from ours. The
garage would be well below the level of Cliff Road so that it would
not be conspicuous.
Attached is a copy of a recent survey showing the location of our
house and the Amundsons' garage, with the proposed garage, setback
line and easement area sketched in. The survey was done for a lot
split application which we may pursue in the future.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
V ry tr}aly yours,
J e/7/
s/qT'.' Unker
Nancy A Unker 3
1775 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Mr. Dale C. Runkle
City Planner
Eagan Municipal Center
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Application for Setback Variance
Lot 10, Block 3, Cedarview
Dear Mr. Runkle:
Enclosed is our application for a setback variance to allow a
detached garage to be built 25 feet from the south boundary of our
property at Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview, 1775 Cliff Road. This would
require a variance of either 25 or 50 feet depending on the status of
a 25 foot easement which Dakota County has agreed to revoke, and the
City of Eagan has agreed to vacate. Assuming the easement is vacated,
the variance would be 25 feet.
We are requesting the variancebecauseof hardships resulting from •
unusual characteristics of our property. The primary concern is the
high level of noise from traffic on Cliff Road. Our house is situated
near the rear of the lot to reduce the noise level, but noise is
still very bothersome. Locating the garage closer to Cliff Road will
increase the area that will be shielded from noise by the garage. It
will also decrease the area that will be subject to viewing from
Cliff Road, thereby increasing our privacy. Because the house is near
the rear of the lot, our primary yard area is between the house and
Cliff Road, so increasing privacy is very important. If we have to
locate the garage closer to the house, our usable yard area will be
greatly decreased.
The setback variance would not affect our neighborssince our
neighbors to the west, the Amundsons, have a garage that is about the
same distance to Cliff Road, 30.8 feet from their south lot line. Our •
neighbors to the east, in Woodgate, 2nd Addition are separated from
us by an outlot that is about 125 feet wide, our lot is barely
visible from their lots, and their lots face away from ours. The
garage would be well below the level of Cliff Road so that it would
not be conspicuous.
Attached is a copy of a recent survey showing the location of our
house and the Amundsons' garage, with the proposed garage, setback
line and easement area sketched in. The survey was done for a lot
split application which we may pursue in the future.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
V ry tr}aly yours,
J e/7/
s/qT'.' Unker
Nancy A Unker 3
1775 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
s
1®
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL DEER HUNT
A. Department of Natural Resources for Request for Special Deer
Hunt in Fort Snelling State Park, November 8 and 9, 1986, and
November 15 and 16, 1985 --The City has received a request from
Jon Parker, Area Wildlife Manager representing the State of
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,for an exemption from
the firearm ordinance that would allow a public deer hunt in
Fort Snelling State Park on November 8 and 9 and November 15
and 16, 1986. The City Council amended Chapter 10 of the City
Code (page 229) to allow a special hunting season to be established
by the City Council for the purposes of wildlife management.
Special weekends have been designated in both 1984 and 1985 as
indicated in the attached letter. For additional .information
regarding the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources request
for a special deer hunt, refer to pages 33 through
Also enclosed is a news release for the Department of Natural
Resources regarding the DNR's appeal to the metropolitan cities
to help solve the deer population problem. A copy of that DNR
release is enclosed on pages ,5Y through 3 9 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
exemption from the firearm ordinance, allowing a
hurt in Fort Snelling State Park on November 8 and 9
15 and 16, 1986.
jz
or deny an
public deer
and November
rMCDEPARTMENT
�S�7T2ATE OF
V�lJ IEZ(Olrz=J OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONENO. 296-2553 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN 55106 FILENO.
May 15, 1986
Tom Hedges
City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
• We are requesting an exemption from the firearm ordinance
within the City of Eagan to hold a public deer hunt in Fort
Snelling State Park on November 8 and 9, 1986 and on Novem-
ber 15 and 16, 1986.
The overpopulation problem in the Minnesota Valley is still
very serious despite the reductions due to our hunting in
1984 and 1985. The attached bar graph shows the results of
our winter censuses since 1982. The dotted lines are the
population densities we would be experiencing if we had not
held hunts in 1984 and 1985.
Three observations are apparent from the chart. First, the
deer herd in the Park is st i l l over twice as large as the
Park can support in the long run. Second, the deer overpop-
ulation problem has grown much worse outside the boundaries
of the Park. And third, that the deer hunts in 1984 and
1985 have spared the Park the kind of increases in deer
numbers that have occurred outside the Park.
The second chart we have attached shows the incidence of
deer/car collisions In the neighborhood of the Park since
1979. As you can see, the problem is still on the increase.
Damage to Park vegetation has grown worse. Browse surveys
last year were discontinued in December since all available
browse had been utilized by that time, and the scarcity of
healthy woody vegetation made sampling impossible.
We are proposing the following actions to correct this
problem:
1. To expand the public hunt in the Park to include two
weekends, and to hold the hunt earlier in the season to
try and avoid the severe weather that so hampered last
year's hunt. Our goal is to remove 100 deer from the
Park. As was the case last year, all hunters will be
33
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Tom Hedges
May 15. 1986
Page Two
offered the opportunity to take a bonus deer. The
bonus deer will be antlerless only. Compartments FI
and F2 will be combined this year into a single compart-
ment with 65 permits issued, the same as the total
Permits issued last year. Permits in this.zone will be
for shotgun only. As before, hunters will be required
to hunt from elevated stands.
2. If the expanded hunt fails to removed 100 deer, DNR
marksmen will remove additional deer to reach our goal.
3. The Department will be.working with private landowners
and neighboring municipalities to increasethe number
of deer removed on lands adjacent to the Park. Remov-
als outside the Park are essential if we are to solve.
the overpopulation problem.
If you need any further information, please feel free to
contact Craig Cox at 296-2553 or Jon Parker at 445-9393. We
look forward to meeting with you and the City Council, to
discuss this matter.
Sin rely,
Craig A Cox
Region Re urce Management Specialist
n Parker
Area Wildlife Manager
CC205:Ik 3
MINNESOTA VALLEY DEER CENSUS: 1982-1986
100 —1
90 ( ---,
80 --
Fort Snelling Lonq Meadove L Total Ares Population Densities
M(FS) Black Dog (TOT( without 1994, 1985 _ __-
-1 (LLB) bunts --�
PJ �
70
w
roi
60
y
w
q �
r 50 i
o
- T
ro
0
40
a
30
carryin920
capacity
10
(FS) (LCB) (TOT) (FS) mm (TOP) (FS) ("B) (TOT)(FS) (LLB) (TOf) (FS) (LLB) (TOT)
1982 �3 1984 ® 1985 1986
YEAR
# OF COLLISIONS
140
130
120
110
100.
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
DEER/CAR COLLISIONS 1979 --1985
FORT SNELLING AREA
YEAR.
36
AIRPORT AREA
MENDOTA HTS
EAGAN
TRAILS
H.k,,
H
A
FACII
nII
T: 41
H.Io,. For, Snall.n.
7
Cance Landing
IT
P
SCALE
L
L
L2
7—
Si 1Aj
Lau,
F.21
pi;,
C: Boal Lending
T: 41
7
Cance Landing
IT
"I'venine canae,
Parking
M
Shall.,
Pd,P
rarlooks
PRIVATE PROPERTY
Pubic We Piona,ded
SCALE
L
L
L2
7—
Si 1Aj
Lau,
F.21
37 Fort Snellinq State Park
pi;,
T: 41
IT
M
mL
c
147
37 Fort Snellinq State Park
rMCDESTATE OF
PARTMENT
HCZO`4LQ
BOX 500 LAFAYETTE
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296-6157
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • '55146
May 20, 1986
DNR NEEDS HELP IN SOLVING
METRO DEER PROBLEM
The deer herd in the Minnesota Valley within the Twin Cities and its suburbs has
grown to the point that it is endangering its own food sources, destroying the growth
of new vegetation and posing a severe hazard to motorists, says the. Department of
Natural Resources.
The problem is the most critical in the suburbs of Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan
and Mendota Heights -- in general, the area between the Mendota Bridge and I-35 W.
Included in the area of over -population is Ft. Snelling State Park, the Minnesota •
Valley National Wildlife Refuge and large tracts of private land. Although limited
deer hunts were held in 1984 and 1985, too few deer were taken and the herd has
continued to expand.
In 1984, the first year the Park and Refuge were opened, hunters removed 57 deer.
DNR parks and wildlife officials said they hoped hunters would remove 100 deer
annually during 1985, 1986 and 1987.
In an attempt to reach this objective, hunters last year were offered the
opportunity to take two deer, but only 52 deer were taken due to the extreme cold and
wind that hampered hunters.
The rate of removal has fallen way behind the reproduction of the herd, according
to DNR wildlife officials, and the situation is getting worse every year.
A census of the deer herd in February showed a density of 69 deer per square mile
within the Ft. Snelling, Long Meadow, Black Dog area -- triple the figure that
wildlife biologists have calculated the area can support without severe long term
damage to vegetation.
The number of deer -auto collisions has increased sharply in the Ft. Snelling area
since 1978 when fewer than 10 were recorded. By 1984, the number bad risen to nearly
90, and the figure for 1985 was 138.
Officials say it is essential that at least 300 deer be removed from the
Minnesota River Valley Refuge and Park area this year to avoid a possible major
die -off of the herd from starvation, and to reduce deer -auto collision problems and
harm to vegetation.
(MORE)
3g
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
:�
Page 2
METRO DEER PROBLEM (Cont'd)
To attain this goal, the DNR is proposing to continue holding controlled deer
hunts in the area. Under these proposals, if adverse weather conditions or other
factors reduce the bag significantly below the 300 figure, DNR personnel selected for
their marksmanship will take the additional animals from public land, supplying the
meat to charitable institutions.
DNR wildlife chief Roger Holmes said use of sharpshooters for herd reduction is
the last option used by most wildlife agencies to control over -population, but
sometimes becomes necessary. He cited the occasion several years ago at the Twin
Cities arms plant in Arden Hills, a deer control program in the city of North Oaks,
and the recent problems at Fort Snelling Cemetery.
He said, "Local communities understand the situation and have cooperated with the
Department by allowing hunting within their boundaries; however, one of the problems
® encountered in trying to remove enough deer from the area is that much of the private
land is closed to hunting. The DNR will be working closely with all of the local
communities to develop a long-term solution to the problem."
This fall, the Department is proposing to have the season open for two weekends
instead of one, and allow hunters to take two deer. Officials will also try to
persuade private landowners to permit hunters on their property.
"These proposals will need the understanding and support of the property owners,
local officials and the public," he concluded.
-30-
•
a
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Thirteen
Memo
Council Meeting
HOME ESTATES, INC./VARIANCE REQUEST
B. Home Estates, Inc. for a 20' Variance from a 40'" Setback
Requirement Along Public Street for Lot 2,, Blockl, Whispering
Woods --Home Estates, Inc.,, Terry Hilla•, has submitted an applica-
tion requesting a 20' setback variance from Slaters Road for
Lot 2, Block 1, Whispering Woods Addition. For additional informa-
tion on this item, refer o the Planning Department report, a
copy is attached on pages through.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or
variance request as presented by Home Estates, Inc.
40
n
deny the
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: HOME ESTATES, INC., TERRY HILLA
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, WHISPERING WOODS ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE.DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. JUNE 3, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 2.9, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
20' setback variance from Slaters Road for Lot 2, Block 1, Whisper-
ing Woods Addition.
COMMENTS: In past actions taken by the Eagan City Council, a
20' setback variance for Lots 1, 8, 9 and 10 have been granted
in the past. What this 20' variance allowsis a rear setback
of 30' or 80' from centerline of Slaters Road. It has been
noted that Slaters Road has an excess right-of-way also requiring
excess setback from that right-of-way. In past actions, these
variances have been granted and Lot 2, Block 1, was overlooked.
The access to this lot will be f:-om Slaters Court, the cul-de-sac
providing access to the rest of the lots. The variance is for
a rear setback and if the variance is approved, would be contingent
on a restricted access on Slaters Road. All other City ordinances
shall be adhered to.
•
DCR/JJ
?. 1; „12>
I /
I 1 11 u
'L
S 89° 3'N2"
PER Dact..nE uJ 1{ Z
N.
379996 �.�.
{ O
•z 'Q: yN.
36 O
i 0'
•
s.neCR
Truorckawc
r
,ac z
� f;P
l_EGHL
►JoRrr(d s f,>s, o
yFharzIPT(ol-r
TC
Ju�4EA&IN45 CrbGu-;,0� n
O�END7rtfi (96" MONUMWIM
:Im
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the
laws of the State of Minnesota,
' Dates
-Roy
.
Le IM Bohlen
v
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986 City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY/VARIANCE REQUEST
C. Sunshine Construction Company for a 5' Side Yard Setback
Variance for Lot 6, Block 2, Birchpark Addition --An application
was submitted by Sunshine Construction Company for a 5' side
yard setback variance for a single family home located on Lot
6, Block 2, Birchpark Addition. For additional information on
this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is
attached on pages_t[ through.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance request as presented by Sunshine Construction Company.
•
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 2, BIRCH PARK ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. JUNE 3, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 29, 1986
REPORTED BY: EAGAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application. has been submitted requesting a
5' side setback variance for a single-family home located on
Lot 6, Block 2, Birch Park Addition.
COMMENTS: The lots along Windcrest Avenue are all 65' in width
and are a buffer between the Windcrest Planned Development,
which is a combination of townhomes and duplexes. The 65' single-
family lots are made to be a transition between the Windcrest
and Birch Park Addition. It is the City's understanding that
the, homes along Windcrest Avenue are higher value than what
were originally intended. The home presently is 50' in width
and would require to be 451, meeting the normal setback requirement.
The 10' side setback to the house portion has been set, however,
a 5' variance will be needed for the living portion behind the
garage. Presently', the garage is 5' from the east property
line, but the living portion behind the garage would require
a 10' setback and this is where the variance is requested.
• If approved, all other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
DCR/J J.
-SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE SIENNA CORPORATION
WINDCREST AVENUE
N 86'17'09" IS A
65.00 (B88.iJ
LOT 6
•
r
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Fifteen
Memo
Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/RMC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
D. RMC Development Corporation for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition --The City
has received an application from the RMC Development Corporation
requesting that duplex lot splits occur on Lot 2 of Sun Cliff
First Addition.. This request will split two identical 40'X 130.02'
lots and is considered a waiver of plat for recording purposes.
Enclosed on pagesthrough y is a copy of a report
prepared by the Planning Department that describes the parcel
and action required by the City Council.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Lot 2, Sun Cliff First Addition.
WAIVER OF PLAT/RMC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
E. RMC Development Corporation for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 3, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition --An applica-
tion to split a duplex lot was submitted by RMC Development
Corporation for Lot 3, Sun Cliff lst Add -tion. This lot has
an irregular shape and the front property lines of the two new
lots will measure 38.95 feet and 36.31 feet. This application
was submitted at the same time as the waiver of plat for Lot
2, by RMC Development Corp. and, therefore, the requests were
combined into one report which is referenced in the previous
item.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for RMC Development Corporation, Lot 3, Sun Cliff
First Addition.
�-6
LOT 3: Is irregular shaped with 75.26' of total frontage.
The front property lines of the new lots will measure
38.95' and 36.31'.
The building structures meet all City setback requirements and
separate utilities are provided for each unit.
If approved, these duplex lot splits shall be subject to all
• applicable Code requirements.
JS/3J
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT:
(2.) WAIVER OF PLATS
APPLICANT:
R.M.C. DEVELOPMENT CORP
LOCATION:
LOTS 2 & 3 SUN CLIFF IST ADDN
EXISTING ZONING:
P.D. 79-1
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:.
JUNE 3, 1986
DATE OF REPORT:
MAY 27, 1986
REPORTED BY:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Two separate applications have been
submitted
,® by R.M.C. Development '.Corp.. requesting duplex lot
splits on
Lots 2 and 3 of the Sun
Cliff 1st Addition. Both
lots have
frontage on Deer Hills Trail.
LOT 2: Measures 80' x 130.02'
and will be split into 2
identical
40' x 130.02' lots.
LOT 3: Is irregular shaped with 75.26' of total frontage.
The front property lines of the new lots will measure
38.95' and 36.31'.
The building structures meet all City setback requirements and
separate utilities are provided for each unit.
If approved, these duplex lot splits shall be subject to all
• applicable Code requirements.
JS/3J
0
SUN CL/FF ADDITIONS
City of Eogan
Off f..e A/:
ADVANCE DEVELOPERS INC
J
u•c..m +o.e
10/
10,
:t. t
,A w
t.
�� • Yrn^ Mir....•.. \.
1•..r !� .wr e..^
LA
�� • Yrn^ Mir....•.. \.
1•..r !� .wr e..^
U
ti
%fie S
Scale: 1"=30'
0.,, X00
O Denotes Iron Monument
0
j t 1✓�
L wBde
"p 0 �{
3 4 .�i `1
S
so, e
a
The southeasterlv 40.00 feet OL.LQt.2 Block 1,
SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION, Dako _, Minnesota.
Scale: 1' - 30'
O Denotes Iron Monument
N
�s
The northwesterly 38.95 feet of
a,. Block 1, SUN CLIFF FIRST AD,
Shkota County, Minnesota.
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen .
DEVELOPERS ESCROW AGREEMENT
F. Developers Escrow Agreement --In May of 1985, the Council
directed the development and implementation of a development
escrow policy to insure that developers within this community
pay for the costs incurred by staff and outside consulting services
that are necessary to review, process and inspect their proposed
development. During the past 12 months, this policy has been
formulated and gradually implemented into the City's operations.
On April 15, the proposed Development Escrow Agreement contained
on pages5�L through 49 D was forwarded to the Council for
preliminary review.
Due to the fact that this is a modification to the Subdivision
Ordinance, Chapter 13 of the City Code, a formal public hearing
was held before the Planning Commission at their May 27 meeting.
At that time, there were no significant comments from the public
and the Planning Commission unanimously endorsed its formal
adoption by the Council. The Public Works Director will be
available to discuss the details of this agreement and escrow
policy at the June T meeting, as may be necessary.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment
to the Subdivision Ordinance;, Chapter 13, regarding the development
escrow policy.
40
CITY OF EAGAN
DEVELOPMENT ESCROW AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, mace and entered into on the _ day of ,
198_, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a municipality of the State of
Minnesota, (hereinafter called the CITY), and the Developer identified herein.
A. The term "Developer" as use herein refers to:
Whose address is
• WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City for approval of the plat or
subdivision known as located within the City; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of said approval, the City is
likely to incur certain costs including administrative and consulting costs
involved in the processing of such application, and the City requires a
guaranty that such costs will be paid by the Developer to avoid unnecessary
billings to Developers; and "
WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes
® Chapters 412 and 462, the City will process the application on the condition
that the Developer enter into this Development Escrow Agreement, which
agreement defines certain duties and responsibilities of the Developer, as
well as the City, and the Developer shallprovide a bona, letter of credit, or
collateral agreement in the amount and with conditions satisfactory to the
City, providing for the securing to the City the ultimate payment of all such
costs incurred by the City; and .
WHEREAS, the City shall account to the Developer for the expenditure of
the escrow funds on a periodic basis; .
el
1
NOW THEREFORE, the City and Developer agree as follows:
1. Preliminary Plat Application Escrow. It is understood that the City
shall commence to process the preliminary plat application at such time as
this Agreement is executed by all appropriate parties and the escrow requirea
hereunder is posted in a form acceptable to the City.
2. Final Plat Application/Contract Management Escrow. If at the time of
submission of the application for final plat approval, the developer has
determined to install any public street or utility improvements privately,
then the oeveloper shall submit two separate escrows in amounts and with •
formats satisfactory to the City as follows:
a. A final plat application escrow relating to processing final plat
applications, review .of required submittals and preparation of related
agreements, payable at the time the final plat application is submitted to the
City.
D. A contract management escrow paid at the time of the execution and
release of the final plat by the City covering inspection, agreement
compliance, contract management, ana other necessary'costs for City approval •
and/or acceptance of privately installed City improvements, and other relates
development requirements.
3. Use of Escrow Funds. The City may draw upon the escrows to pay its
costs necessarily related to the specific purpose for which the escrow was
posted and the City shall determine all of its costs incurred', including both
administrative and consulting services, at the rates normally charged by the
City or its consultants, determined according to City standards. A copy of
the current administrative and consulting rates is attached which rates are
subject to change by the 'City Council without notice to the Developer. (See
Exhibit "A").
2
4. Conditions of Escrow. The following conditions shall apply to the
subdivision application escrow contemplated under this Agreement:
a. City Administrative hourly rates for .processing applications shall be
determined at two times the normal hourly rate including all benefits and
overhead incurred by the City. (See paragraph 3)
b. Payment shall be made to City consultants, including but not limited
to engineering, legal and planning, in the amounts actually billed to the
City, according to the customary consulting rates in effect at that time. (See
• paragraph 3). Such consulting services or costs shall reasonably and
necessarily relate to the subject matter of the applications as determined by
the City.
C. The City shall determine which escrow accounts shall be billed in
relation to each phase of the application process and any balances remaining
in any particular escrow account may be transferred to escrows required for
any other applications or projects being processed through the City by the
same developer.
•
U. The City shall not be responsible for paying any interest on the
escrow accounts contemplated under this Agreement.
e. In the event that there is an inadequate balance in the escrow
account, the City will determine and require additional deposits to the escrow
account to insure continued coverage of costs required for the completion of
the processing of the application.
5. Balances in Escrows. In the event that there are any balances in the
escrow accounts upon completion of the development process, or in the event
that an application is withdrawn by the developer, denied by the City or for
any reason, is not completed within the time frame required by the City, then
the balances shall be refunded as follows:
3
a. The City shall pay such balances to the applicant/developer unless
written instructions are submitted to the City and signed by the developer and
the proposed recipient of the funds, prior to repayment by the City.
b. In the event that any developer desires to assign its interest in its
escrow, then the developer shall notify the City in writing of the assignment
of its interest.
C. In the event that the City fails to refund any balance in an escrow
account contemplated under this Agreement, then the developer may request
payment from the City ana the refuna shall be mane by the City within .ninety
(90) days of written notice to the City that the application has been
terminated ana only after all costs covering the application or project have
been paid in full.
6. Escrow Amounts. The escrow amounts contemplated for each of the
purposes described unser this Agreement which may be revised by the City from
time to time shall be as follows:
a. Preliminary Plat Application Escrow. A cash escrow at the time of
submission of the preliminary plat application in amounts according to Exhibit
b. Final Plat Application Escrow. A cash final plat application escrow
for privately financed improvements payable at the time of submission of the
final plat application, in the amounts provided in Exhibit "B".
C. Contract Management Escrow. The contract management escrow submittea
prior to release of the final plat by the City in the amounts provided in
Exhibit "B". At least one-third of such escrow shall be in cash with the
remaining amounts in such form acceptable to the City.
5�z
I
7. Reduction of Non -Cash Contract Management Escrow. That portion of the
non-cash contract management escrow contemplated herein may be,reaucea upon
written request of the developer and upon consent of the City, prior to
completion of all requirements contemplated under the preliminary.plat escrow
provisions of this Agreement. It is understood that all amounts contemplated
under this Agreement shall be capable of being converted into cash, and
recoverable on demand by the City, which determination shall be made solely
within the discretion of the City.
• 8. Accounting. The City will provide an accounting of all expenses
charged against each escrow account when requested by a developer but in no
event more often than monthly and also such accounting will be provided when a
request is made by the City to replenish the cash portion of any escrow.
9. Terms of Breach. In the event of breach of any terios of this
Agreement by the developer, the City may at its option, terminate this
Agreement and order the developer to cease any further development or progress
under the terms of this Agreement.
• 10. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause,
paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Agreement.
li. Binding Agreement. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Lana herein
described and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, administrators and
assigns of the developers referenced in this Agreement.
12. Amendments. The terms of this Agreement shall not be amended without
the written consent of all parties hereto.
�5
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals
CITY OF EAGAN
(Date:
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
DEVELOPER:
By: l
Date 40
Approved as to Content: Its:
Department of Public Works And: /
(Date: ) Date
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Hauge, Eiae a Keller, P. A.
Attorneys for the City of Eagan
1200 Yankee Doodle Road
Water. View Office Tower, Suite 3.03
Eagan, MN 55122
(612) 454-4224
56
i
Its:
40
Exhibit A
HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A.
City Attorney
General Legal Services
Paralegal Fees
Page 1 of 3
RATE PER HOUR
$ 60.00
$20.00- $25.00
WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
(Parks)
6,7
CLASSIFICATION
RATE PER HOUR
Principal Engineer
$ 54.00
•
Principal Planner
54.00
Principal Landscape Architect
54.00
Engineer
42.00
Senior Planner
42.00
Senior Landscape Architect
42.00
Associate Planner or Landscape Architect
28.50
Senior Construction Coordinator
40.00
Senior Engineering Technician & Construction
Observer 34.00
Engineering Technician
28.50
Draftsman
22.00
Typist
15.00
Two -Man Survey Crew
61.00
Three -Man Survey Crew
73.00
6,7
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES
CLASSIFICATION
Principal Engineer
Registered Engineer
Graduate Engineer & Field Supervisor
Senior Draftsman
Senior Technician
Technician
Word Processor
Clerical
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reproduction, Printing, Dupicating
Out -of -Pocket Expenses such as Meals,
Lodging, Stakes, Telephone Calls,
Etc.
Mileage
RATE PER HOUR
$49.50
45.00
36.00
33.50
30.00
22.00
22.50
17.00
At
Invoice
Cost
•
At
Actual
Cost
URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN, INC.
STAFF
Principal Planner (1)
Planner II (2)
Landscape Architect I (3)
Landscape Architect II (2)
Draftsman
Secretary
Research Assistant
Mileage (per mile)
Materials
$0.20/Mile
RATE PER HOUR
$ 50.00
38.00
33.00
25.00
20.00
10.50
20.00
.24
Cost
('1) "Planner -In -Charge" as designated by the State of Minnesota
for 701 Planning and minimum five (5) years experience.
(2) Masters or undergraduate degree and minimum three (3) years
experience.
(3) Minnesota Registration by State Board and minimum five (5)
years experience. 5�y
•
•
•
Exhibit A
CITY STAFF
Director of Public Works
Assistant City Engineer
Engineering Technician I
Engineering Technician II
Engineering Technician III
Engineering Intern
City Planner
Planner I
Planning Aide
Director of Parks & Recreation
Landscape Architect
Police Captain
Maintenance Worker
Page 3 of 3
1986 HOURLY RATES *
$46.32
33.24
17.49
20.98
24.11
12.50
39.01
23.80
17.31
39.75
25.97
38.93
24.04
* Employees subject to overtime provisions of FLSA are billed
50% higher when overtime is required.
159
Exhibit B
Preliminary Plat Application Escrow
$ 50 Per Acre
$250• Minimum
$800 Maximum
Final Plat Application Escrow
$150 Per Acre
$500 Maximum
Contract Management Escrow
Estimated Construction Costs
$ 0 - $150,000
$150,001 - $500,000
$500,001 +
Page 1 of 1
LI
Escrow
4% ($ 500 Minimum)
3% ($ 6,000 Minimum)
2.5% ($15,000 Minimum)
* Costs will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary
to be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring arms -length
transaction costs.
M
Agenda Information
June 3, 19'86, City
Page Seventeen
Memo
Council Meeting
FUTURE STATUS OF DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE
G. Future Status of the Developers Task Force --With the implementa-
tion of the developers escrow policy, the Planning Commission
and City Council requested that a Developers Task Force be formula-
ted to review the policy and prepare an appropriate agreement
to facilitate the implementation of this new policy. The Developers
Task Force has. met several times, during the past 8 months and
completed its primary purpose through adoption of the proposed
Development Escrow Agreement at its last meeting on April 9,
1986.
• The members of the Task Force and Planning Commission fully
endorse the continuation of this committee to address similar
future significant issues relating to development within our
community. Several of the possible items for review are contained
in the April 9 minutes enclosed on page( In addition,
at the May 27 Planning Commission, it was unanimously recommended
that the Task Force be maintained as an ongoing committee available
to the Planning Commission and Council to review and recommend
solutions to development related problems that may be identified
by staff, Planning Commission or Council.
Therefore, due to the fact that the initial duties of the Task
Force have been completed, it is appropriate for the Council
to determine whether the Task Force should remain as an ongoing
committee or should be disbanded.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To disband or continue
the Developers Task Force.
6f
MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
APRIL 9, 1986
A meeting of the Developer's Task Force was convened by
City Administrator Hedges at 3:15 p.m. on April 9, 1986, in the
conference rooms of the Municipal. Center building. Those in
attendance were Pat Hoffman, Advanced Developers; Mark Johnson,
Mark Johnson Construction; Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation; Tom
Hedges, City Administrator; Tom Colbert, Public Works Director;
Gene Van Overbeke, Finance Director; Dale Peterson, Chief
Building Inspector; Paul Hauge, City Attorney; and Jon
Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant. Those persons -absent were
Gary Fuchs, Eagan Construction; Mayor Blomquist, City Council
representative; and Lori Trygg, Advisory Planning Commission
representative.
• MINUTES
Minutes of the March 19, 1986 and March 27, 1986,
Developers Task Force meetings were reviewed and accepted.
TASK FORCE
City Administrator Hedges reviewed Task Force member Loren
Spande's resignation and offered six candidates as possible
replacements. The candidates each received an equal number of
votes in the original Task Force balloting. The candidates were
Robert Tilsen, Raymond Sonnek, Lou LaPierre, Brad Swenson, Dan
Gustafson and Larry Frank. The group continued discussion of
this item until after the escrow agreement had been reviewed.
City Administrator Hedges left the meeting at 3:25 p.m. to
keep another engagement. Director of Public Works Colbert then
led the meeting as its facilitator.
DEVELOPMENT ESCROW
The Task Force took up the escrow agreement as amended
pursuant to their earlier deliberations by City Attorney Hauge.
Member Hardy raised concern that the Letter of Credit required in
the City's development agreement covers some of the same costs
anticipated by the escrow agreement. Considerable discussion was
held concerning the potential for developer funds to be committed
through two mechanisms for the same cost. The Director of Public
Works agreed to amend Exhibit C, to the financial guarantee of
the standard development contract used by the City, to reflect a
108 credit for private developments which have met the escrow
requirements. In further discussion, the Task Force indicated it
would be necessary to attach, as an exhibit to the agreement,
1
Developers Task Force Minutes
April 9, 1986
those City fees which may be charged against escrow accounts
covered by the agreement and that certain signatures need be
attached to all agreements to assure accountability even if the
form remains essentially unchanged.
Concern was also expressed that the agreement is to be
signed at the time of the preliminary plat application but that
it binds developers at subsequent development times. Member
Hardy pointed out that the agreement isnot. filed with the County
Court and is therefore not discoverable through a title search.
This might create unknown obligations if a project changed hands
and the escrow was not a part of the sale agreement. It was
determined that the amount of money involved would not be
significant, in most instances, and it would often be to the
benefit of the purchaser if certain costs were guaranteed by it.
After further discussion Hardy moved, Colbert seconded, to
approve the Development Escrow Agreement, as amended, and
forward it for review and approval by the APC and City Council,
such review to include a public hearing before the Advisory
Planning Commission on May 27, 1986. All members voted in favor.
TASK FORCE
The Task Force took up their consideration of a
recommendation of a replacement member for Loren Spande.
There was discussion concerning the need to balance various
perspectives on the Task Force and it was suggested that a
combination builder/developer could better identify various sides
of an issue and serve the Task Force well in that regard. Member
Johnson suggested that any future discussions .of task force
representation be in terms of balancing interests of commercial,
single family and multi -family development. After further •
discussion, the development representatives of the Task Force
suggested that Dan Gustafson, D.H. Gustafson Company, and Larry
Frank, Northland Mortgage, be contacted and recommended, as their
first and second recommendations, for appointment to membership
on the Developers Task Force.
TOPICS FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION
Public Works Director introduced the item and indicated
that the City Council would determine whether the Developers Task
Force will continue to meet. To clarify to the Council which
issues might be considered, should the Task Force tenure be
extended, the group was asked if it wished to prepare a list of
issues that could be addressed at future meetings. A general
discussion of the duties and responsibilities of the Developers
Task Force followed. There was general discussion concerning the
need that, the Task Force not be viewed as an arbitor of specific
disputes, but that it be a sounding board and means of
communication between the development community, City Council,
63
2
Developers Task Force Minutes
April 9, 1986
Advisory Planning Commission and City staff. After further
discussion of the need to maintain the means of communication
provided by the Task Force, the group developed a list of nine
possible topics for future discussion. The topics were:
1. Construction debris and erosion control.
2. Inspection and coordination of grading plans and
schedules for public and private development
improvements.
3. Coordination of residential or business occupancy to
insure the availability of services.
4. Dissemination of development information during the
application process.
40 5. The Five and Ten -Year Capital Improvements Program
priorities.
6. Zoning and long range planning 'review and
recommendations.
7. Financing public improvements and tax exempt municipal
bonds.
8. Evaluation of the concept of a board of appeals to
review deviations from Building Code Requirements.
9. Evaluation and identification of community amenities
and recreational service needs.
® It was suggested that such discussions not be viewed as an
alternative to the review process the City currently has, but as
a means of providing additional input from the development
community on issues pertaining to it. Based upon these topics,
the Developers Task Force suggested that the City Council
consider. authorizing the group to continue to meet.
The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
City Clerk
Dated
3
JDH
E
Is
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Eighteen
Memo
Council Meeting
RESOLUTION/PROPOSED LAND DIVISIONS
H. Resolution/Dakota County Notification of Proposed Land
Divisions --The City of Eagan is still experiencing problems with
the recording of land divisions by Dakota County when the property
has not been properly platted or a waiver of plat approved by
the City Council. On at least two (2)occasions the City Council
has approved action and submitted a request to Dakota County
asking that no property divisions be approved without a waiver
of plat or formal platting by the City of Eagan. The recording
of property divisions without awareness by the City of Eagan
has caused problems for the Special Assessments Division, water
and sewer utility billing and other City records. The Director
of Finance has contacted the Dakota County auditor and according
to Norma Marsh, if the City Council considers a subdivision
regulation resolution and upon its approval, submits the same
to the Dakota County for enforcement, all land divisions will
be returned to the City of Eagan unless they are properly platted
or have a waiver of plat of record with the City. Attached on
page 64 is a copy of a resolution entitled "Resolution Requesting
Notification of Proposed Land Divisions and Transfer of Unplatted
Properties" for your review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
resolution as stated.
G5
To approve or deny the
RESOLUTION
CITY OF RAGAN
REQUESTING NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED LAND DIVISIONS
AND TRANSFER OF UNPLATTED PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has adopted regulations
governing the subdivision of land within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 provides
for certain restrictions on transfers of real property lying
within municipalities; and
WHEREAS, said statute provides for municipalities to
elect to be governed by said statute by resolution; and
® WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan does
hereby deem it to be in the best interest of the City to assure
application of its subdivision regulations to lands within its
boundaries by exercising its prerogatives under Minnesota
Statutes Section 272.162;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan
hereby elects to have the provisions and restrictions of
Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 apply to the transfer and
division of real property within its boundaries and does hereby
notify the Dakota County Auditor of said election and does
further direct that certified copy of this Resolution be filed
with the Dakota County Auditor and Recorder.
MOTION BY:
SECONDED BY:
• MEMBERS IN FAVOR:
MEMBERS OPPOSED:
Date:
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF EAGAN
ATTEST: BY:
City Clerk
Mayor
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true
and correct copy of a RESOLUTION adopted by the City Council of
the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, on , 19
/ E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
(o City of Eagan
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nineteen
ADDITIONAL ITEMSi
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
A. Public Improvement Contracts:
I Contract 86-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Pumphouse #8) --At
10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 29, formal bids were received to construct
the pumphouse for wells #8 -and 9. Enclosed on page ew is
a tabulation of the bids received along with a comparison to
the Engineer's estimate. All bids will be checked for accuracy
on extensions and additions and a formal recommendation will
be made by the Director of Public Works at the June 3, Council
meeting.
•' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-12 (Pumphouse # 8) and award the contract to the
recommended lowest responsible bidder.
2. Contract 86-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (-Hampton Heights
Trunk Watermain)--At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 29, formal bids
were received for the installation of the trunk water main through
the proposed Hampton Heights subdivision and also to service
wells # 8 and 9 presently under construction. Enclosed on page
is a tabulation of the bids received and a comparison
to I the estimate contained on the feasibility report presented
at the public hearing held on August 6, 1985.
All easements required for the installation of this improvement
are being dedicated with the Hampton Heights final plat.
® All bids will be checked for accuracy in extensions and additions
and a recommendation for formal award will be provided by .the
Director of Public Works at the June 3, Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-15 (Hampton Heights - Trunk Water Main) and award
the contract to the recommended lowest responsible bidder.
e, 7
CONTRACTORS
1. Richmar Construction 5% BB
2, A & K Construction 5% BB
•
FEASIBILITY REPORT EST.
UNDER FEAS. REPORT EST
Pi
DEEP WELL NO. 8 6 9
PUMPING FACILITY ..
CONTRACT NO. 86-12
PROJECT -NO. 457
EAGAN:,. MINNESOTA
a
Our File No. 49377
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: Friday, May 30, 1986
$222,000
-16.3%
TOTAL BASE BID
185,730.00
188,829.00
9
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Our File No. 49363
/S
CITY CONTRACT NO. 86—,K
HAMPTON HEIGHTS
TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 451
EAGAN.,MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.,T.
BID DATE: Friday, May 30., 1986
CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID
Orfei & Sons 5% BB $323,551,.43
Northdale Construction 5% BB 323,660.00
Richard Knutson 5% BL' 330 44Q -1n
Winter Construction 5% Bii 347.974.00
Ceca Utilities 5% 348.571.00
F.F. Jedlicki 5% BB 349,360.00
Lake Area Utility 5% BB 356.962.30
Rice Lake Contracting 5% BB 3AQ.A34L5�
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ $340,000.00
FEASIBILITY REPORT EST'. ------- 332,820.00
% Under Engineer's Est. ------- —4.8%
% Under Feasibility Est. ------ —2.8%
5397d 6 /
i
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
Public Improvment Contracts cont'd.
3. Contract 86-11, Approve Plans/Order Ad :for Bids (Williams/
LaRue and Wyndham Corporate Center Additions) --Contract 86-11
provides for the installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer
to. service the Williams and LaRue 1st and 2nd Additions at the
intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. In addition,
this contract provides for the installation of sanitary sewer
and intersection reconstruction necessary to service the proposed
Wyndham Corporate Center Addition in the SW corner of Pilot Knob
Road and 4'94.
® As a result of the public hearings held for each project, the
Council authorized the preparation of the plans and specifications
which have now been completed and are being presented for the
Council's review, approval and authorization to advertise for
solicitation of bids. The majority of the easements necessary
for these improvements have been acquired with one parcel exception
in each project, which is currently in progress and will require
to be obtained prior to contract award.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 86-11 (William/LaRue and Wyndham Corporate Center
Additions) and order the advertisement for a bid opening to be
held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 27, 1986.
4. Contract 86-8, `1986 Seal Coating --As a part of the approved
® 198'6 budget, $61,000 has been allocated from the general fund
budget to be matched by an equal amount from the major street
fund to finance the 1986 Seal Coating Program. Enclosed on page
is a map showing the streets to be seal coated this year wit in
the allocated budget amount. Detailed plans and specifications
have been completed in anticipation of the Council's authorization
to advertise for a bid opening. With July and August the ideal
time to perform the seal coating, this proposed bid opening schedule
is ideal to meet that time frame.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans
for Contract 86-8 and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening
to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 27, 1986.
76
City of Eagan' I
1986'SEALCOAT
Q. North
0 112 1
mile
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
I
CONTRACT 85-21, MAINTENANCE FACILITY EXPANSION
B. Contract 85-21, Maintenance Facility Expansion - Revised
Concept Design Approval --On February 18, 1986, the Council gave
initial concept design approval for the proposed expansion and
remodeling of the City's Maintenance Facility and authorized
the preparation of detailed plans and specifications and another
cost estimate. As a result of refinement, of detailed plans and
analysis of formal bids received for a similar facility expansion
in Apple Valley, it was apparent that the current budget would
be significantly exceeded.
® Therefore, Boarman Architects has met with staff on several occa-
sions to evaluate potential revisions., modifications and alternate
to try and maintain the current budget allocation. Because of
the construction cost constraints, significant concept design
alterations had to be implemented. Therefore, the architect
and staff would like to represent the modified plan to the Council
for their review, approval and authorization to again prepare
detailed plans with another cost estimate.
•
The Public Works Director and representatives of the architectural
firm will be at the June 3 meeting, to discuss in detail the
status and progress of this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the revised
concept design for Contract 85-21 (Maintenance Facility Expansion)
and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and cost estimates.
7y
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Twenty -Two
Memo
Council Meeting
RECEIVE BID/RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
C. City of Eagan Receive Bids/Award Contracts (Base Radio
Communications Stations and Installations) --The City has requested
bids for two complete base radio stations which include instal-
lation. There were three bidders, please refer to the attached
letter from John DuBois, t e City's Communications Consulting
Engineer found on pages through 75 The low bidder
is General Communications of St. Louis Park in the amount of
$10,369. The major piece of equipment is a master base station
that will be installed in the equipment room within the Eagan
police dispatch center.
ACTION TO BE, CONSIDERED ON' THIS ITEM: To approve the low quotation
submitted by General Communications in the amount of $10,369.
73
•
JOHN R. DuBOIS
Communications Consulting Engineer
Registered Professional
Electrical Engineer
May 9, 1986
Mr. Thomas L. Hedges
• City Administrator
City of Eagan
3630 Pilot Knob Road
P. O. Box 21199
Eagan, MN 55123
Dear Mr. Hedges:
7005 Heatherton Trail
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
Telephone (612) 927-6810
The purpose of this letter is to starmiarize the bidding for the tuu,
top-of-the-line complete base radio stations and installation that
were contained in my April 6, 1985 "Request for Quotations" letter.
Three cost quotations were received as follows:
11b. Bidder Location Compliant Amount
1. Motorola, Inc. MinnetonkaYes $10,563.00
2. General Communications St. Louis Park Yes $10,369.00
3. Dave's Electronic Faribault Yes $13,341.00
The low bid from the General Communications Cotrpany includes three items
that are specially priced from the General Electric Company using GSA
pricing (Item #1 at $4,678, Item #3 at $3,624, and Item #8 at $405 for a
total of $8,707).
Based on all of the above information, I recommend that you award this
procurement to the lea, compliant bidder the General Cmururications Company.
If you accept my recommendation, please issue one Purchase Order to the
General Communications Company in the amount of.$1,661 for Items 2, 4, 5,
6, 7, 9 and 10 and a second Purchase Order, in the amount of $8,707 to the
General Electric Company for Items 1, 3 and 8.
711
John R. DuBois
Page 2
Please call me at 348-4081 if you have any questions about this report.
I am pleased to assist you in this important project.
Yours sincerely,
. LL l r
John R. DuBois Ph.D.
Registered Professional Wmuunications Engineer
Minnesota Registration #7350
•
cc: Police Chief Jay Berthe
Mr. Peter Gildart, Motorola, Inc.
Mr. Dennis_Esterly, General Ccmmmications
Mr. Dave Schmidtke, Dave's Electronics Service
Is
75
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 30, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
SENECA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
The Mayor, Director of Public works and City Administrator met
recently with administrative staff from the Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant to discuss methods to control and report odor
originating from their treatment process. It was agreed upon
by all persons present that a committee be established, made
up of residents, that could review changes that are proposed
• for reducing odor at the treatment plant, monitor odor on a reg-
ular basis and provide immediate reports to staff at the treatment
plant. Enclosed on pages through_ is a copy of a
letter that was sent to selected residents in west Eagan, asking
for their consideration to serve on this committee. If the City
Council knows of anyone that would be interested in fulfilling
this type of role, please let this office know who that individual
is and we will contact them by letter or telephone. Also enclosed
is a copy of a poem that Tom Colbert received from the Duluth
Tribune and Herald; it is enclosed on page.
O'NEIL LAW SUIT
The City Administrator and City Attorney met with Mr. and Mrs.
Robert O'Neil, John Klein and their legal counsel, Harold Sheff,
on Monday, May 19, to further discuss a letter of agreement between
the City and the O'Neils that would allow the City to proceed
• with its review and update of the Comprehensive Guide Plan and
in turn, the O'Neil's would not proceed with any depositions,
discovery or other aspects of the law suit. Mr. and Mrs. O'Neil
wanted some assurance that the Comprehensive Guide Plan would
be reviewed and expedited by the City and therefore requested
a schedule for the review and update. A schedule for the
Comprehensive Guide update was prepared by the Planning Department,
reviewed by the City Attorney and City Administrator and submitted
as a proposed schedule to Mr. and Mrs. O'Neil. For a copy of
the schedule, refer to pages_� through �. There .has
been no confirmation made by the O'Neils, at the time of this
dictation, as to whether they are in agreement with the letter.
STAN WESTENBERG LETTER
Enclosed on page iJ is a copy of a note that was sent by Mr.
and Mrs. Stan Westenberg who reside at 2083 Garnet Lane, thanking
the City Council for recent action on the application made by
On -Belay. Mr, and Mrs. Westenberg are members of Peace Reform
Church.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS REPORT/APRIL
Enclosed on pages 0 through Y'(� is a copy of the April
monthly inspections report. Please note that the City has issued
300 single family building permits through the month of April.
MASAC UPDATE
Enclosed is a copy of the most recent agenda and minutes for
MASAC meetings. Tom Baker and Jon Hohenstein are both represent-
ing the City on a regular basis at these meetings. (page(s)f7- 95z ).
VEHICLES FOR SALE
At the last City Council meeting a question was raised about
police enforcement of vehicles "For Sale" placed throughout the
city. Please refer to pageCJl7 for an update and regulatory
considerations relating to t rm
6 City's enforcement of vehicles
"For Sale" throughout the city.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
77
of
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O.. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
May 21, 1986
Tom Hedges, Eagan City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P.O. Box 2119
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear neighbor:
mETROPOumn
WRITE
COnTROL
EOmmiffion
Tom, e� aMQ
For the past several summers, odors originating from the Seneca
Waste Water Treatment Plant located in the Minnesota River Valley
have occassionally drifted into the community.
To control this problem, a number of process changes have been made
at the plant and .odor control systems have been added similar to
those which have been successfully used at the Duluth Treatment
Plant.
Plans have begun for a plant expansion here in Eagan, and odor
control is an integral part of that planning. While odors are
naturally common to waste water treatment, we want to insure that
present and potential future odors are minimized.
In an effort to work with the community on the current status and
proposed expansion, the management of the Seneca plant is working
with the City of Eagan on the formation of an Eagan Air Quality Task
Force. You have been selected as a neighboring resident who may have
an interest in serving on this committee to work with the Seneca
staff in discussing concerns, monitoring problems and recommending,
potential solutions. The Committee will meet once a month for
approximately one and a half hours.
An informational meeting has been
June 12, 1986 at the City Hall.
situation at the Seneca plant, the
the plans for plant expansion. We
tour of the Eagan facilities.
M
set for 4:30 p.m. on Thursday,
We will discuss the current
current odor control program, and
will also make plans for a future
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Neighbor
Page 2
May 21, 1986
Ii ;you are not interested or are unable to participate on this Task
Force Committee, we would appreciate it if you could recommend an
interested and concerned citizen for consideration. Please contact
the City Administrator's Office as soon as possible in light of the
upcoming meeting.
We look forward to seeing you and discussing concerns which are
mutual to us all.
Sincerely, .-
Bea lomqui
Mayor, City of Eagan
BB/CJ/hb
79
��-
ames Wawra
Seneca Plant Manager
n
U
Friday, April 5, 1985
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District wastewater
tment plant.
Osgood broadcasts on the air
a poem on what's in the air
BY DARREN CARROLL
Staff writer
The wastewater treatment plant in Duluth was lifted from the
edge of Lake Superior into
the annals of literature Thursday.
Well — almost. Charles Osgood. news-
caster and commentator with CES, picked
a story that ran in Thursday's News
'�'v.,
rT
Tribune &Herald, waxed poetic, and came
Tr-
Lip with a few verses about Duluth and the
"s
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District.
Osgood's story was broadcast nationally
.fes •�%�'
Thursday on his CES radio program. "The
;j
Osgood File."
�.,
The sanitary district has been working
_pY;
c
with masking agents since last fall in a b!d
Y
to lessen the pungentodors emitted from is
plant at 27th Avenue West and the water-
t( �front.
�
Lf
thThe ageagentstested thus far have stens
at run the gamut from bubble gum to
Charles Osgood
pine, and from there Osgood's poem goes:
y
"There is something in the springtime air,
That is somehow beyond compare.
The air in Wcst Duluth is fine.
This week, it smells a lot like pine.
A week or t wo ago, say some
It smelled a lot like bubble gum.
Front week to week it's hard to tell
Ex --cll v how Duluth will smell.
It all depends howsomeone there
Decides ,how he'll perfume the air.
They ha ve good cause, to tell the truth,
76 scent the air there in Duluth.
We'll speak of what the r:7 has in ft
When we return in ju_:t a minute.
Duluth is delightful town ,
I'd never ever put it down.
In no way is Duluth inferior,
Like its great lake, it is superior.
A super place with much togive there
To all the super folks w•ho live there.
But, an observation one could make
About the air dow-rrby the lake;
We'd like to say the treatment plant
Smells like a daisy — but we can't.
When breezes blow ir, from the lake
A certain free, same people mike.
It could smell1wtter. yes, it could
Andhow it doesn't smell isgood.
So the sanitary district there
Decided to perfume the air
To mask the pungent ea u de — please don't ask.
They're trying several different scents
As a form of self-defense
To make Duluth., which is so Pretty.
A somewhat sweeter -smelling city.
To bubble guru, some arc a verse
But there are scenes a whole lot worse.
Some like cedar, some like p.;,^e,
Some think that cinnamon is five.
But that casts fifty grand per drum
So they may stick. to bubble guru.
Or maybe, in lteirciticduty,
They'll choose bay rum, or tuttl frutd."
District Executive Director Seth Holloway, who was phoned by
NEC and RKO Radio Network about the story, said he felt a little
uneasy about the district's national attention.
"I'm not sure that I like all of the notoriety," he said. "Hopefully,
it's to the good of the district."
The district is trying to improve on problems of the c_, t, and
Holloway hopes Duluthians will keep that in mind. Despite the hu-
morous tone of Osgood's ditty, Holloway would like residents to
know that he takes the odor problem seriously.
"If it was taken positively by the citizens of Duluth, then : guess
It's OK." he said.
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE', (612) 454-8100
May 28, 1986
MR & MRS ROBERT O'NEIL .
2040 EDGCUMBE RD
ST PAUL MN 55116
Re: Schedule for Comprehensive Plan Update
Dear Robert & Grace O'Neil:
BEA BLOMQUIST
Mo
THOMAS EGAN
.LAMES A. SMITH
MC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Memwrs
THOMAS HEDGES .
City Atlminislralor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
Our City Planner, Dale Runkle, has met with John Voss, the City's
consulting planner, and it is their opinion that the following
schedule is feasible for the review and updating of commercial
land use within the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The following is
the proposed schedule:
June 2 - 6 Set meeting with individual property owners
to review proposed changes in Comprehensive
Guide Plan
June 11 - 18 Hold meetings with property owners
June 26 Joint meeting/Advisory Planning Commission
and City Council to review Comprehensive
Guide Plan map
June 27 -July 15 Complete any changes to Comprehensive Guide
Plan map
July 22 Public Hearing to be held by Advisory Plan-
ning Commission on any and all proposed
changes
August 5 - 19 City Council review and authorize changes to
be submitted to the Metropolitan Council
Immediately following either the August 5 or 19 City Council
meeting, any changes to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be
submitted to the Met Council for their review.
8/
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
•
LETTER TO MR & MRS ROBERT O'NEIL
MAY 28, 1986
PAGE TWO
If you have any questions regarding the proposed Comprehensive
Guide Plan update, please feel free to contact Mr. Dale Runkle or
me at any time.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Harold Sheff
John Klein
• Chris Dietzen
Paul Hauge
Dale Runkle
TLH/kf
•
LZ
�6�eSS
VL q4 Dace
&IZULC�A is - G✓�
Ole
/141
41A 00(
E
9 • 1' -
.PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AP.RIL 1986
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
Building
163
463
Electrical
Plumbing
174
160
[;1 Z;
409
HVAC
143
441
Water Softener
Signs
12
11
106
34
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0
0
will
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
.1f'ii �� w�7
LOMA
TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES
3
FOUNDATION
1
----
$ 15.00
$ ------
$ 15.0
300
SINGLE FAMILY
100
$ 8,052,40C
37,,274.00
18,636.50'
218,097.2
14
DUPLEX
6
392,OOC
1,974.00
987.00
12,664.0
59
TOWNHOUSE
19
1,776,00 C
7,597.00
3,798.50
59,056.5
6
CONDO
1
527,OOC
1,500.50
750.25
18,870.2
0
APT BLDGS
0
AGRICULTURAL.
6
COMMERCIAL
2
3,787,000
9,833.50
4,.916.75
85,429.2.
16
COMM/IND REMODEL
3
108,70C
585.00
292.70
932.71
01
COMM/IND ADDITION
0
INDUSTRIAL
0
INSTITUTIONAL
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
2
6,022,000
15,421.00
7,710.50
73,106.5(
5
RES. GARAGES
3
25,500
217.50
64.25
294.7'
9
RES. ADDITIONS
5
84,500
513.50
216.50
764.5(
0
SWIM POOL
43
MISCELLANEOUS
21
70,350
829.50
---
869:.0(
0
DEMOLISH
0
HOUSE MOVES
463
TOTALS
163
20,845,450
75,760.50
37,372.95
470,099.7(
YEAR-TO-DATE 45,983,25
184,400.50
90,466.20
1,169,653.9:
LOMA
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE APRIL 1986
TYPE
/ OF
PERMITS
/ OF
BUILDINGS
# OF
UNITS
VALUATION
PERMIT FEES
SURCHARGE
PLAN REVIEW
FEES
TOTAL FEES
3-PLEX
ADDRESS 8 LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATION
FEE
SURCHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUP.
4-PLEX
12
3
12
$ 732,000
$ 3,792.,00
$ 366.00
$ 1.,896.00
25 068.00
6-PLEX
6
1
!6
428,000
2,082.00
214.00
1,041.00
12,844.00
7-PLEX
1480 DEERWOOD DR
IND SCH DIS
8-PLEX
L 1, B 1, DEERWOOD S
H 196
75,500,000
13,933.00
1,525.00
6,966.50
13.933.00
11859
12 PLEX
2
2
4
2
1,143,000
3,223.50
571.50
1,611.75
40,014.75
DUPLEX
6
3
6
392,000
1,974.00
196.001
987.00 1
12,664.00
TOTALS
26
9
26
2,695,000
11,071.50
11347.50
5,535.75
-90,590.75
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN
BLDG
PERMIT
STATE
PLAN REV
PERMIT f
ADDRESS 8 LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATION
FEE
SURCHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUP.
11874
4200 PILOT KNOB RDEASTER
LUTH
PUBLIC
L 011, B 25, SECT 27
$ 522,000
$ 1,488.00
$ 261.00
$ 744.00
$8,688.0
ACILI'
1480 DEERWOOD DR
IND SCH DIS
11732
L 1, B 1, DEERWOOD S
H 196
75,500,000
13,933.00
1,525.00
6,966.50
13.933.00
11859
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
EAGAN WOODS
82,200
382.00
41.50
191.00
614.5
COMM
L 1, B 1, EAGAN WOOD
LAND LTD PT
11758
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
„
13,000
98.50
6.50
49.25
154.2
COMM
L 1 B 1 EAGAN WOOD
11802
1380 CORP CTR CURVE
L.2 B 2, EAG OFC.2
NW MUT'L LIFE
-13,500
104.50
7.00
52.45
163.9
COMM
11820
1200 TRAPP RDB
NW MUT'L LIFE
1,750,000
4,558.00
875.00
2,279.00
37,374.0
COMM
2020 SILVER BELL RD
11731
L 1 B 1 DALLAS DEV
DALLAS DEVE
2,037,000
5,275.50
915.00
2.,637.75
48,055.2
COMM
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AP985
OFFICE HOURS - INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH TEAR -TO -DATE
Building 308 1,018
Plumbing
123.5
529.5
HVAC
91
189
. Signs
136
281
Adminlatrative/Office
43
207
Fire Marshal
49
154
Miscellaneous
81.7
312 .7
General Office
298.1
756.1
Permit Processing
228.2
936.2
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED
THIS MONTH
TEAR -TO -DATE
Building
151 -
332
Electrical
102
338
Plumbing
94
302
HVAC
103
292
Nater Softener
14
47
Signs
INDUSTRIAL
31
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0
0
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
f
• TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee,
SAC A YAC charges, water meter, road unit fee, parks
dedication A water treatment plant fee.
TYPE
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE
I PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL FEE
160
SINGLE FAMILY
73
$ 5,612,000
$ 26,274
1$ 13,134.00
$150,314.00
34
2 -FAMILY
20
986,000
5,591
2,795.50
78,879.50
90
MULTI -FAMILY
38
2,193,000
11,576.00
5,788.00
75 460.50
1
AGRICULTURAL
1
25,800
175.00
87.50
1,116.50
13
COMMERCIAL
-2
750,000
2.241.001
1,120.50
10,425.50
I
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
INSTITUTIONAL
I
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES
err-ro
3
RES- GARAGES
3
13,600
151.50
—
159.00
3
SWIM POOL
3
28,000
229.50
—
243.50
26
MISCELLANEOUS
11
25,850
751.00
-
366.00
332
TOTAL
151
S 9,634,250
S 46,589.00
$ 22,925.50
$276,964,50
YEAR-TO-DATE
1 3321$23,027.243
1$107.255.001$
52,900.00
$625,619.00
• TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee,
SAC A YAC charges, water meter, road unit fee, parks
dedication A water treatment plant fee.
O H CO 1 tOt C�C O CPC LO
y f, 0H CHCHC
m m m m
9 W
I�III
0
0
o
it
m
P
O
H w
z
I
err-ro
'-ovoP
a
o--
00
v
OmmOmPA
0
o
nm
Ou
q
yl/.
i
Sm>n�oar
n
H
> m
2
a
A
m
n 1
ons
c
maw
a
O A
T
i
F
N
O
O
0
O
x
r
A
-mi
Om
I
N
N
a
0
o
o
c
a
H
P
S
pO
O
S
z
O
q
u•
o
mA
m 3
N
m
W
m N
H
0
O
O
0
0
0
N
n w
O
O
A 1
O
m
S
S
o
N
N
q
m
u
m
O
mn
N S
0
O
O
0
O
�
O
-
H
O
a
P
IJ
r
O
8
m
n
o
n
O H CO 1 tOt C�C O CPC LO
y f, 0H CHCHC
m m m m
!P
018 18 18 IS
I�III
!P
018 18 18 IS
E IE
MAY 27, 1986
7,:30 PM
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1. Call to Order, Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on April 22, 1986
3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications
4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization
Report and Complaint Summary Report.
5. Part 150 - Land Use Considerations - HNTB
6. Persons Wishing to Address the Council.
7.Executive Committee Meeting Report
A. Selection of MASAC Representative to Noise Budget k-brking
Group
B. Inver Grove Heights Application for Membership
8. Resolution for Darrell Weslander
9. Report of MAC Noise Program
10. Other Items Not on Agenda
11. Adjournment
NEXT MEETING DATE: June 24, 1986
97.
•
40
April 22, 1986
7:30 P.M.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1. Call to Order,, Roll Call.
The meeting was called to order by Robert Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and
the secretary was asked to call the roll. The following members
were in attendance.
Ben Griggs(R)
Northwest Airlines
Bob Johnson(R)
Republic Airlines
Richard Dinning(A)
USAir Airlines
David Woodrow(R)
St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
Ron Glaub(R)
MBAA
Jerry Norton(R)
Mpls. Chamber of Commerce
James McLaughlin(A)
Airline Pilots Association
Jeff Hamiel(R)
Metropolitan Airports Came
Roylene Champeaux(R)
City of Minneapolis
John Richter(R)
City of Minneapolis
Steve Cramer(A)
City of Minneapolis
Scott Bunin(R)
City of St. Paul
Lloyd Wickstrom(R)
City of St. Paul
Don Priebe(R)
City of Richfield
Mark Mahon(R)
City of Bloomington
Robert Mood(R)
City of Bloomington
Bernard Friel(R)
City of Mendota Heights
Tom Baker(R)
City of Eagan
Michael Brucciani(R)
City of Burnsville
Juan Rivas(A)
City of Burnsville
Paul Cain(R),
City of St. Louis Park
Robert Pollock(R-Associate)
City of Inver Grove Hts
Doug Casserly.(R)
Airborne Express
Advisors
Commissioner Jan Del Calzo Metropolitan Airports Comic
Bob Botcher FAA
Frank Benson FAA
Dick White Air Transport Association
Nigel Finney Q� Metropolitan Airports Comm
Darrell Weslander U Technical Advisor
Jan Conner Secretary
Guests
Gordon Wagnor
Dave Kelso
Tom Lund
Jon Hohenstein
Mr. & Mrs. Harley Kielson
Lenore Brill
J. K. Nelson
David Duddleston
Mr. & Mrs. Don Witz
Jean Melin
Marty Silvi
City of Minneapolis
SMAAC
City
of
Eagan
City
of
Richfield
City
of
St. Louis Park
City
of
Bloomington
Republic Airlines
City
of
Richfield
City
of
Inver Grover Heights
City
of
Inver Grove Heights
2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on March 25, 1986.
The minutes were approved with one correction. Under letter H. .
where each item was voted on separately, item 1B has a•correction
in the count -the minutes will be changed to show 12 Yes and 8 No with
1 vote abstained.
3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications.
USAir Airlines' new alternate representative, Richard Dinning,
was introduced to the MASAC members. MASAC also received written
communication from the City of Eagan officially appointing Mr. W.
Dustin Mirick as Eagan's alternate member of MASAC. Written
statements were received from attorneys representing DHL, Airborne
Express and the Air Cargo Association regarding access to the
airport at night.
4. 'i-chnical Advisor's Preferential
The reports for the month of March were presented by Darrell
Weslander and were approved as presented.
Darrell also spoke on repeat callers. During December 1985, January
1986 and February 1986 the 20 most frequent callers represented
between 40% and 60% of the total noise couplaints. Don Priebe asked
him to point out areas where the frequent callers are located
suggesting only approximately 20 people are making many calls in the
South Minneapolis area. It was suggested that we try calculating the
number of calls each of these repeat callers make during a month.
Darrell Weslander was also asked to provide another report showing
runway use percentages excluding nighttime hours.
5. Persons Wishing to Address Council.
Martin Silva of Inver Grove Heights expressed his concern that
the City of Inver Grover Heights be considered for membershipinto
MASAC. The matter will be referred to the executive committee.
-3-
6. Vote to Amend By-Laws:Expanded Membership.
A discussion took place concerning the Executive Co Taittee Meeting of
February 4, 1986 at which time the By -Laws changes were drafted for
the addition of new members into MASAC.
Mark Mahon moved and Scott Bunin seconded to have Burnsville and
Airborne Express accepted as new MASAC members. The motion was
passed.
7. Airport Noise Implementation Working Group -Report on
Bob Johnson read the schedule for action on Long and Short Tenn
Noise Abatement Measures:
April 22 - MASAC review and comment
April 23 - MAC Operations and Environment Committee meeting to review
both drafts
• April 24 - MAC meets to act on the reports
April 30 - Governor receives MAC noise abatement program
It was pointed out that many of the recommended measures in these
drafts are very similar or identical to those in MASAC's recommended
Part 150 Program. Only four MASAC measures found no parallel in the
draft reports: #3 - differential noise fee; #6 - assignment of
propeller aircraft to Runways 11L -29R when the preferential runway
system is in use; #10 - tighten procedures relating to the "Eagan
Corridor"; and #12 - enforce and optimize the nighttime run-up
policy.
Ton Baker moved and Bernie Friel seconded that MASAC recommend to
the Working Group to have them reconsider the above 4 items left out
of the Working Group's Long and Short term drafts. The motion was
passed.
• 8. Summer Construction Program at MSP -Nigel Finney.
Nigel Finney briefly explained the various construction projects
that will be taking place at the Mpls. Airport over the next year.
9. Other Items Not on Agenda.
Jeff Hamiel explained the MAC is currently trying to purchase an
instrument landing system on runway 11L(the only runway at MSP that
doesn't have an IIS.) The FAA currently states there is an
approximate waiting period of 2 years on this equipment. The MAC is
still negotiating.
John Richter spoke briefly on the MAC Meeting of April 21, 1986.
It was noted that there was informational material available
from Roy Madgwick concerning the Islip Airport Noise Abatement
actions.
Michael Brucciani moved and Jeff Hamiel seconded to endorse
Northwest and Republic Airlines merger as a sound abatement
-4 -
measure. Bernie Friel motioned to table the motion with Mark Mahon
as the second. Notion was tabled.
10. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
9/
1985
Wold Chamberlain Field
Run -UP.
DIiscellane ou s
1986
Wold-ChamberraTn Field
Run -ups
Miscellaneous
Total
394
2
75
4.71
804
6
33_
843
Miscellaneous complaints In-
cludes helicopters and secon-
dary airports.
Crystal
Flying Cloud
St. Paul
Apple Valley
Bloomington
Burnsville
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Edina
IGH
Lauderdale
Lakeville
Mendota Hgts.
Mpls.
Richfield
Roseville
Savage
St. Louis Park
St. Paul
S: St. Paul
3
2
28
33
ie,
1
3
6
1
1
2
1
7
266
9
4
2
302
IDG r
6 `
19
26
45
2
6
1
22
337
26
1
1
MINNEAPOLIS
61bbllo YA
32 14% ,1%
308
20
18`] O
RICHFIELD/
BLOOMINGTON
r l I Mf
1
502 HOURLY PERCENTAGE USE OF RUNWAYS
MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
APRIL 1986
ST. PAUL/HIGHLAND PARK
ftIutYelr.
EMIL
63a 94
t
`IIrR1A
MENDOTA HEIGHTS/
EAGAN
OPERATIONS SUMMARY -
1985
/ 1986
Itinerant:
Air Carrier
766
654
Commuter
120
88
General Aviation
167
199
Military
16
29
Loca I :
Civil 37 40
Military 0 0
Total Average Dally Op06 1010
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE (AC)756/732
122/177 of these are 3rd level carriers
utilizing prop aircraft.
MONTH OF APRIL 1986
MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT RECORD
Nighttime
Number of Excessive Structural Activity Restricted Ground Low Secondary
Date Complaints Noise Disturbance Interruption Hours Run -ups Noise Flying Airports Miscellaneous
1
25
19
-
1
-
- -
3
2
-
2
33
22
-
5
3
- 1
2
-
-
3'
22
16
1
4
1
- -
-
-
-
4
40
27
-
6
3
- -
3
1
-
5
"29
19
-
3
1
- 1
4
-
1
6
41
32
1
3
-
- -
5
-
1
7
22
14
1
-
-
- 1
3
1
1
8
26
17
1
3
1
- -.
3
1
-
9
18
12
-
1
-
- -
2
2
1
10
32
26
-
3
-
- -
2
1
-
11
20
18
-
-
-
- -
1
1
-
-,Z12
0113
21
23
11
19
1
-.
4
2
-
-
- 1
- -
1
1
2
1
1
-
14
24,
18
-
-
-
-- 2
3
1
-
15
25
22
-
-
-
- -
1
2
-
16
17
11
-
-
1
1 1
1
2
1
17
23
15
-
3
-
1 1
2'
-
1
18
37
30
-
2
-
2 -
2
1
-
19
18
13
-
-
-
- 2
2
1
-
20
18
12
-
1
-
- 1
4
-
-
21
22
14
2
3
-
- -
1
1
-
' 22
16
.7
-
2
- _
2 -
3
1
1
23
32
26
-
2
1
- 1
1'
1
1'
24
19
14
1
2
-
- 1
-
-
-
25i
47
36
-
3
2
- 1
4
1
1-
26
34
20
1
4
-
- 2
4
3
-
27
60
42
1
6
-
- 1
10
-
-
28
33
26
1
1
-
- 1
4
-
-
29
33
27
-
3
-
- -
2
1
-
30
33
24
-
6
-
- 1
2.
-
-
843
609
11
73
13
6 19
76
27
9
APRIL 1986
NOISE COMPLAINTS
RN
Category and Time of Day
During April the following complaints were recorded:
Category
Number
Percentage
238
1200-1559
Excessive Noise
609
72.2%
Structural Disturbance
11
1.3%
Activity Interruption
73
8.7%
Nighttime Restricted Hours
13
1.5%
Run -ups
6
.7%.
Ground Noise
19
2.3%
Low Flying
76
9.0%
Secondary Airports
27
3.2%.
Miscellaneous
9
1.0%
843
100.0%
u_ss=
2400-0559
31
0600-1159
238
1200-1559
144
1600-1959
228
2000-2359
155
CAP
47
843
9�
Lit, . it)
.•
3630 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
23 May 1986
TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: VEHICLES "FOR SALE" WITHIN THE CITY
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
CM.I., P.I.
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Abnlnlnmlw bouln
KENNETH G. AB2MANN
I would like this information to be shared with the mayor and
city council members.
I have asked Operations Captain Aszmann to instruct our patrol
division to once again be aware of vehicles which are for sale on
public property or on private property if the vehicle for sale
does not belong to the property owner.
Current city code, section 9.15 reads -as follows:
"Parking for the Purpose of Advertising or Selling Merchandise It
is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle on any street for
the purpose of advertising such vehicle for sale, for the
purpose of advertising for sale or selling merchandise thereon
or therein, or advertising any merchandise for sale or a forth-
coming event."
Under this section of the city code.,. we can control the sale of
vehicles on streets, highway right-of-way and private property
where the seller of the vehicle is different than the owner of
the property.
We are restricted from stopping people from having vehicles for
sale on their own property as long as the vehicle is currently
licensed (to them) and is driveable.
Captain Aszmann has informed me
wor,Cingg on this problem throughout
Jd Berthe
V�
JMB/vk
that the officers are already
the city.
9.5
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OFSTRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 3, 1986
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Approve Grading Permit #EX22-066 (St. John Neumann
Church)
Item 2. Approve Final Plat, Yorkton Industrial Park South
Addition
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR S CITY COUNCILMSMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 2, 1986
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
1. Approve Grading Permit #EX22-066 (St. John Neumann Church) --
We have received an application for a grading permit from St.
John Newman Church to expand their existing parking lot north
towards Deerwood Drive. The excess material generated from this
grading operation will be used by a subcontractor to the City's
contract for upgrading of Deerwood Drive from Pilot Knob Road to
I -35E. All application materials have been submitted, ,reviewed
by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve grading permit
#EX22-066 (St. John Newman Church).
2. Approve Final Plat, Yorktown Industrial Park South Addition --
We have received an application for final plat approval for the
above referenced subdivision located between TH14'9 and Delaware
Trail (County Road 63), south of Becker Road (old County Road
63A) as shown on page * 'This proposed final plat has
complied with all the conditions and configuration of the
preliminary plat approved by Council action on December 3; 1985.
All final plat application material has been submitted, reviewed
by staff a•nd found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Yorktown Industrial Park South Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
City Administrator
TLH/mc
Special Note: Will be available at Council meeting on Tuesday.
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN., MINNESOTA
CITY HALL.
JUNE 3, 1986
6:30 P.M.
p I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
J
.�,.1 II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - ESTABLISH BOND SALE DATE FOR $4,650,000 G.O.'IMPROVEMENT BONDS,
$3,000,000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID BONDS AND $700,000 TAX INCREMENT
BONDS OF 1986
IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
T/I - A. Cable Commission
v. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
rP13 A. Contractor Licenses
IG, B. Personnel Items
p•1e C. Eagan Lions Club, Temporary Beer License for 4th of July
/ Celebration
P.ZaD. Fawn Ridge Addition, Revise Agreement/Extend Completion Dates
VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
�•1� A. Vacation of Common Lot Line Utility and Drainage Easement of
Outlot F, Lone Oak Addition (Continued from May 6, 1986, City
Council Meeting)
Z3 B. Vacation of Street and Utility Easements for Eagandale Lemay
Lake Addition
`.'. L5 C. Vacation of Highway' Slope Easement for Lot 10, Block 3,
Clearview Addition
VII. OLD BUSINESS
PZ A. James Unker for a 25' Variance from 50' Setback Requirement Along Public Street for Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition,
Located East of Lenore Lane & Fronting on Cliff Road, SE 1/4 of
Section 29
VIII. NEN BUSINESS
$ P A. Department of Natural Resources for Request for Special Deer Hunt in Fort Snelling State Park, November 8 and 9,7-9-8-6,�and
November 15 and 16, 1986
P.B. Home Estates, Inc. for a 20' Variance from 40' Setback Require-
ment Along Public Street for Lot 2, Block 1, Whispering Woods
Located at Slater Road & Slater Court, SW 1/4 of Section 31
NEN BUSINESS (continued)
P,q% C. Sunshine Construction Company for a 5' Sideyard Setback Variance
for Lot 6, Block 2, Birch Park Located at Windcrest Avenue West
of Denmark Avenue, NW 1/4 of Section 22
D. RMC Development Corporation, for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition Located
South of Diffley Road on Deer Hills Trail, NW 1/4 of Section 29.
P. E. RMC Development Corporation for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 3, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition, Located
South of Diffley Road on Deer Hills Trail, NW 1/4 of Section 29
'P. D F. Developers Escrow Agreement
p.(,t G. Discuss Future.Status of Developers Task Force
(rj H. Resolution/Dakota County Notification of Proposed Land Divisions
I%. ADDITIONALITEMS
�p
67 A. Public Improvement Contracts
1 �p 67 1. Contract 86-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Pumphouse #8)
1672. Contract 86-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Hampton Heights
/ Trunk Watermain)
p.76 3. Contract 86-11, Approve Plans/Order Adveertisement for Bids
(Williams/LaRue and Wyndham Corporate Center Additions)
P- 4. Contract 86-8, 1986 Sealcoating
f7, 7y B. Contract 85-21, Maintenance Facility Expansion/Revised Concept
Design Approval
p.73 C. City of Eagan, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Base Radio
Communications Stations and Installation)
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
%I. ADJOURNKENT.
2
a
MEMO TO: HONORABLEMAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 29, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT:AGENDA APPROVE -'MINUTES'
After approval is given to the June 3, 1986, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the May 21 meeting and Special
City Council meeting minutes for April 29, the following items
are in order for consideration:
At a Special City -Council meeting held on April 9, 1986, the
City Administrator and Director of Finance reviewed the necessity
to sell bonds prior to September 1, at which time many General
Obligation Bonds will become taxable according to HR 3838. A
sale date of July 1, 1986, was generally discussed at the Special
City Council meeting. It was also determined that all three
issues would be combined for the same sale date to allow for
a savings in preparation of the bond perspectus and issuance
expenses even though the three bond issues must be treated as
three separate sales. For additional information on this item,
refer to sale memos prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financial,
Inc., that provide detailed information describing each of the
proposed bond sales. This information is enclosed on pages Z,
through_. Mr. Ernie Clark, the City's Fiscal Consultant
from Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., will be present to answer
any questions the City Council might have regarding the three
sales. The sale date is July 1, with a bid opening at 11:00
and the bid award scheduled for 6:30 p.m. which is the first
regularly scheduled City Council meeting during the month of
July.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To schedule a bond sale
date for July 1, 1986, at which time bids will be opened and
award considered for the sale of $4,650,00.0 G.O. improvement
bonds, $3,000,000 Municipal State Aid bonds and $700,000 TIF
bonds for 1986.
II
I/ - -. , t -
C
Tull Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Tull Free Ocher States (800) 328-6122
er & Schroeder F acial, Inc.
Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South-P.O., Box 789 • M inneapol is, Minnesota 55440 (612) 831-1500
SALE MEMO
TO: Mr. Stephen Rosholt
Faegre cic Benson
2300 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
FROM: Ernest L. Clark
ISSUE:
INITIAL
RESOLUTION
SALE DATE:
BONDS DATED:
BONDS DUE:
INTEREST
PAYMENT DATE:
MATURITIES:
May 19, 1986
City of Eagan, Minnesota
$3,000,000 General Obligation State -Aid Road Bonds, Series
1986
June 3, 1986, regular council meeting, 6:30 p.m.
I
July /, 1986 open bids at 11:00 a.m. C.D.T,
Award regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. C.D.T.
July 1, 1986
July 1
January 1 and July 1, commencing July 1, 1987
$ 150,000
- 1987
160,000
- 1988
170,000
- 1989
180,000
- 1990
190,000
- 1991
205,000
- 1992
220,000
- 1993
235,000
- 1994
250,000
- 1995
265,000
- 1996
275,000
- 1997 -
175,000
- 1998/01
C.D.T.
and tabulate.
REDEMPTION: The issuer may elect on July 1, 1996 to repay obligations due on
or after July 1, 1997/01. All prepayments shall be at a price of
par and accrued interest.
HcaJyuarrtm Minncatx,li., Minncwra
Bninch Offi... S.. Lira Ikach,("iI mia•5r.Pahl,Minnc.uW•Mi1w.wkcc, Wiuvnsln•Sen Fnmciscu. Cakf,,mia
.,,,i..,.ni,.Y........ . e,.—•, n.....—� .
RATES:
DISCOUNT:
FUNDS:
GOOD FAITH
CHECK:
REGISTRAR:
PROJECT:
APPLICATION
FUNDS:
The rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100ths or 1/8th of
1%. No rate or maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any
subsequent maturity by more than 1%. Obligations of the same
maturities shall bear a simple rate from the date of the
obligations to -the date of maturity.
$52,500
Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds, not
Clearing House funds.
$60,000 cashier's or certified check payable to the City.
First Trust Company, Inc.
State -Aid Roads Project
Construction Costs
Discount
Issuance Costs
Interest Earnings
TOTAL:
M
$2,922,000
52,500
27,000
(1,500)
3 000 000
ti
v II 5555555955515 ra ry Iy II F-
U II In L) h1 111 0 Irl F. r5 N 'Si N N II r -.I
II 11 -
> If r OJ Ill SU W [U IP Il) 5 G1 lil ID N 9 4s: it If I
- II CO ul Ul rU Cti Ir:J r In u) f9 r OJ N 51111 II
N II N f•)U7 Ln :. .-:m OJ Ij ill i4,l It Irl
II iUInrmmIII ulmmm= f•l•-+mr 11 I11
i+ II 1•) I•l rl r•) 1•) 4 4 t �t t t OJ .a Ln rn II r
.O II f•l 6 r7 M I•) I•) r•) f•] f•] r+J I•] i.J OJ II h)
aJ II 11
L' II II v
II
II
II
++
If 69995559615595195 11 5
N It II) 4) N h) h) to 4c & 5 Is 55995 1! 5
W II II
N II CO W LI) 111+; LDLD r m.5 M 11) V1595 II U)
tU )rN99N II -+
II lJ fIn
1•�-r +-1 �J V7 m .+ .� m 4 iJ NU] (U II V)
`i111It WU-)ra1OrrurSmfiuim�-4 m
mr1.u0d f•) 70.-1 Ln rD u)41•) CII ..1 II r
,..,, a In
n .
11
II
II
II
11
II
ti II -5)995595 N5 5 r'11
al 01 C
W .1= ❑0
4i ra
i4
111 4, u
sL
In a n
1n m
-
Y 1L
Y
a,
Ln
5 5 5 64
G II 61695511155 h) 51IF, ty I� Nr'.
n II rIs, 4'If tiz I- in --III v u'r n,r ¢I
II
II 4 h) L) 61 li] h1 n; rD ui ll1 lO.,D u. rr
I-) It
II 5 9 9 9 5 5 51 5 51 5 9 5 N N N II 5
ra II 5 5 5 r5 5 N ti N F. &, j .1, S S ti II N
II
11 5556154N95IS, F F�!y IF,, Fy ti 11 IS
U II 6455 N55 N 455995?: ry II 151
S. II ry 9595 N 1G IS, Is 646411, r.. 4c 4I, II 9
If .. - II
L II 9 5 5 5 5 I17 5 4) IS 11) U.) n) bi Li; h.: II 6'
a II II) U) rm In 5Cu 104"lwrr-Irrr II 5
-1 ,i ti " N 44J Ilj r1J Ill I)j I,i r-4 ,-1 .I .. : It f;J
u
It11 r7
II
II
a1 11 t- (30 IT) (9 N1•)•J V1mrmCr- 5-+ II
Y II mmmUi Ln Cn Cn Ln n+Cn Cn
6 S
Cn, rn ' II
rG II \\\\\\\\\�.\ \�\\ II w
II J
!995559 ry 54GIS, 5 r5 R,Iy n. If Q
If I-
rrrrrrrrrrrrrrran
II I
•
I
tA
II
4:'
11 111
U 41,
N f.I rI
ill
j I, Y II
n,'l'i4 a
> I'l fl al LTI
4
T.1 d 4 14t'
Cl L ++
IL r-4 m Ili 5'7
n ru
4 N ri II rG
It N i . U
++ 0 m Ll G: N
> I— > .�
F- U
IL CC Q
E
i
Ir
L;J
I
I
r4
Tull Free Minnesota (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328-6122
n r c el
Inc.
Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes- Avenue Sourh • P.O. Box 789 -Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440(612)831-1500
May 19, 1986
SALE MEMO
TO: Mr. Stephen Rosholt
Faegre h Benson
2300 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402.
FROM: Ernest L. Clark
ISSUE: City of Eagan, Minnesota
$700,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1986
INITIAL
RESOLUTION: June 3, 1986, regular council meeting, 6:30 p:m. C.D.T.
1
SALE DATE: July /, 1986 open bids at 11:00 a.m. C.D.T. and tabulate.
Award regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. C.D.T.
BONDS DATED: July 1, 1986
BONDS DUE: August 1
INTEREST
PAYMENT DATE: February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 1987
MATURITIES: $ 40,000 - 1989
120,000 - 1990
125,000 - 1991
130,000 - 1992
140,000 - 1993
145,000 - 1994
REDEMPTION: Bonds due in 1989 callable at 102
Bonds due in 1990 callable at 101.5
Bonds due in 1991, callable at 101
Bonds due in 1992 callable at 100.5
,Bonds due in 1993/94 callable at 100
RATES: The rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100ths or 1/8th of
1%. No rate or maturity shall exceed the rate specified for any
subsequent maturity by more than 1%. Obligations of the same
maturities shall bear a simple rate from the date of the
obligations to the date of maturity.
Hca.l.pnrrtcrs: Minncapoli.c, Minncwra
Pr:mch li((itts: Srdun.i Ik.ah, Cali4,mi.r • Si.
NO, Minncxrta • Milw,mkm W ieuoos in • San F,m.,k r. Cahfi,m n
>I.mhv.n Jw \4mm.lmoinr l'nn.aom r..np: ......
C
DISCOUNT:
$10,500
FUNDS:
Bond proceeds must be in immediately
available funds, not
Clearing House -Funds.
GOOD FAITH
CHECK:
$14,000 certified or cashier's check payable
to the City.
REGISTRAR:
First Trust Company, Inc.
PROJECT:
Sperry Project
APPLICATION
FUNDS:
Construction Costs
$ 622,482.
Discount
10,500
Capitalized Interest (1.5 years)
63,555
Issuance Costs
7,000
Interest Earnings
(3,537)
Is
TOTAL:
700,000
I
Exhibit Al
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Tax Increment Cashflow
Using 50% of Revenue
50% Debt Semi -Annual Excess
Date T.I. Revenue Service Balance Revenue
8/
1/87
43,485.00 *
43,485.00
.00
.00
2/
1/88
20,070.00 *
20,070.00
.00
.00
8/
1/88
50,000.00
20,070.00
29,930.00
29,930.00
2/
1/89
50,,000.00
20,070.00
29,930.00
59,860.00
8/
1/89
100,000.00
60,070.00
39,930,.00
99,790.00
2/
1/90
100,000.00
19,030.00
80,970.00
180,760.00
8/
1/90
100,000.00
139,030.00
( 39,030.00)
141,730.00
2/
1/91
100,000.00
15,790.00
84,210.00
225,940.00
e/
1/91
100,000.00
140,790.00
( 40,790.00)
185,150.00
2/
1/92
100,000.00
12,290.00
87,710.00
272.,860.00
8/
1/92
100,000.00
142,290.00
( 42,290.00)
230,570.00
2/
1/93
100,000.00
8,552.50
91.,447.50
322,017.50
8/
1/93
100,000.00
148,552.50
( 48,552.50)
273,465.00
2/
1/94
100.,000.00
4,422.50
95,577.50
369,042.50
8/
1/94
100,000.00
-------------------------------------�-------
149,422.50
( 49,422.50)
319,620.00
11263,555.00
943,935.00
319 620.00
* denotes capitalized interest of 63,555.00
Prepared by Miller & Schroeder Financial:
7
5/20/1986
40
•
Issue Date:
Settlement Date:
First Coupon:
a
$700,000 Tax Increment Bonds of 1986
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Debt Service Schedule
7/01/86
8/01/86
8/01/87
Date Principal Coupon Interest Debt Service
8/01/87
0.00
0.000
43,485.00
43,485.00
2/01/88
0.00
0.000
20,070.00
20,070.00
8/01/88
0.00
0.000
20,070'.00
20,070.00
2/01/89
0.00
0.000
20,070.00
20,070.00
8/01/89
40,000.00
5.200
20,070.00
60,070.00
2/01/90
0.00
0.000
19,030.00
19,030.00
8/01/90
120,000.00
5.400
19,030.00
139,030.00
2/01/91
0.00
0.000
15,790.00
15,790.00
8/01/91
125,000.00
5.600
15,790.00
140,790.00
2/01/92
0.00
0.000
12,290.00
12,290.00
8/01/92
130,000.00
5.750
12,290.00
142,290.00
0.00
0.000
8,552.50
8,552.50
®2/01/93
8/01/93
140,000.00
5.900
8,552.50
148,552.50
2/01/94
0.00
0.000
4,422.50
4,422.50
8/01/94
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
145,000.00
6.100
4,422.50
149,422.50
TOTALS 700,000.00 243,935.00
Accrued Interest to 8/01/86 = 3,345.00
Total Bond Years = 4203.
Gross Interest Cost = $ 243,935.00
Average Coupon 5.803%
NIC = 6.053%
Average Life = 6.00 Years
Discount @ 98.500 10,500.00
•
File: e4.dbt
Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 5/19/86
943,935.00
Tull Free Minnesuta (800) 862-6002
Toll Free Other States (800) 328.6122
', er &Schroeder FinancW, -ffic.
Northwestern Financial Center • 7900 Xerxes Avenue South • P.O. Box 789 • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 (612) 831-1500
May 23, 1986
SALE MEMO
TO: Mr. Stephen Rosholt
Faegre & Benson
2300 Multifoods Tower
33 South Sixth'Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
FROM:
ISSUE:
INITIAL
RESOLUTION:
SALE DATE:
BONDS DATED:
BONDS DUE:
INTEREST
PAYMENT DATE:
MATURITIES:
Ernest L. Clark
City of Eagan, Minnesota
$4,650,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series
1986-A
June 3, 1986, regular council meeting, 6:30 p.m., C.D.T.
1
July z', 1986 open bids at 11:00 a.m. C.D.T. and tabulate.
Award Regular Meeting at 6:30 p.m. C.D.T.
July 1, 1986
December 1
June 1 and December 1 commencing June 1,.1987
$ 50,000.00
- 1987
500,000.00
- 1988
500,000.00
- 1989
500,000.00
- 1990
500,000.00
- 1991
500,000.00
- 1992
300,000.00
- 1993
300,000.00
- 1994
300,000.00
— 1995
300,000.00
- 1996
260,000.00
- 1997
130,000.00
- 1998
130,000.00
- 1999
130,000.00
- 2000
130,000.00
- 2001
120,000.00
- 2002
9
Head.piarrvr: Alinnearyilis, Minncsai ra
Paanch CMico:Sd:na 1"ch, C,hf,,.i.-Si. Paul; Minn (.-Md...kee. Wi.,nsm•Sm Frncixn, Calilamia
is
171
•
REDEMPTION: The issuer may elect on December 1, 1992 to repay obliga—
tions due on or after December 1, 1993. All prepayments
shall be at a price of par and accrued interest.
RATES: The rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100ths or
1/8th of 19. No rate or, maturity shall exceed the rate
specified for any subsequent maturity by more than 1%.
Obligations of the same maturities shall bear a simple
rate from the date of the obligations to the date of ma—
turity.
DISCOUNT: $88,350
FUNDS: Bond proceeds must be in immediately available funds, not
Clearing House funds.
GOOD FAITH
CHECK: $93,000 cashier's or certified check payable to the City.
REGISTRAR: First Trust Company, Inc.
PROJECT: Sewer, Water, Sanitary Sewer, and Street Improvements.
APPLICATION
FUNDS: Construction Costs: $3,576,923
307 Contingency Cost: $1,073,077
TOTAL: $4,650,000
$4,650,000 City of'Eagan, Minnesota
General Obligation Improvement Bonds of 1986, Series A
Debt Service Schedule
Issue Date: 7/01/86
Settlement Date: 8/01/86
First Coupon: 6/01/87
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Debt Service
12/01/87
50,000.00
4.900
385,744.17
435;744.17
12/01/88
500,000.00
5.100
269,840.00
769,840.00
12/01/89
500,000.00
5.200
244,340.00
744,340.00
12/01/90
500,000..00
5.400
218,340.00
718-,340.00
12/01/91
500,000.00
5.600
191,340.00
691,340.00
12/01/92
500,000.00
5.700
163,340.00
663,340.00
12/01/93
300,000.00
5.900
134,840.00
434,840.00
12/01/94
300,000.00
6.100
117,140.00
417,140.00
12/01/95
300,000.00
6.200
98,840.00
398,840.00
12/01/96
300,000.00
6.400
80,240,.-00
380;240:00
12/01/97
260,000.00
6.500
61,040.00
321,040.00
12/01/98
130,000.00
6.700
44,140.00
174,140.00
12/01/99
130,000.00
6.800
35,430.00
165,430.00
12/01/00
130,000.00
6.900
26,590.00
156,590.00
12/01/01
130,000.00
7.000
17,620.00
147,620.00
12/01/02
------------------------------------------------------------------
120,000.00
7.100
8,520.00
128,520.00
------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS
4,650,000.00
2,097,344.17
6,747,344.17
Accrued
Interest to 8/01/86
=
22,690.83
Total Bond Years = 33988.
Gross Interest Cost = $ 2,097,344.17
Average Coupon 6.171%
NIC = 6.431%
Average Life = 7.31 Years
Discount @ 98.100 88,350.00
File: eagan.dbt
Prepared by MILLER & SCHROEDER FINANCIAL: 5/23/86
•
0
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
A. CABLE COMMISSION
1. Cable Commission Update --Ralph Campbell,
Cable Administrator will be present to answer
provide an update regarding any business that
conducted by the Cable Commission.
/Z
Burnsville/Eagan
any questions and
is currently being
Agenda In -formation
June 3, 1986, City
Page Three
Memo
Council Meeting
CONSENT.AGENDA:
There are four ( q") items. on the agenda referred to as
Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council.
If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda
and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required
is brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSES
A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page 1� is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained
as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to
reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references
from other municipalities or their client permit applications
are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
contractor licenses as presented.
15
To approve the list of
•
•
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
. JUNE 3, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
1. W. H. CATES CONSTRUCTION INC
2. CONCORD BUILDERS
3. FULLERTON LUMBER COMPANY
4. E.E. JONES INC
5. NELSON—JOHNSON BUILDERS
6. WESTWOOD REALTY & CONSTRUCTION INC
HOMEOWNER
1. KRAEMER, GARY
1. AL'S HTG & A/C
2. LAKEVILLE PLBG. & HTG INC
• PLUMING
1. ABRAHAMSON PLBG
2. COLLEGE CITY PLUMBING
3. KLAMM MECHANICAL
4. STAR PLUMBING
WATER SOFTENER
1. MILBERT COMPANY
7.�1.1.1o; „
1. DOLPHIN POOL & PATIO
1
W
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Four
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
The following are Personnel Items to be considered at the June
3, 1986 City Council meeting:
Item 1, Forestry Aide (Seasonal) --It is the recommendation of
Park Superintendent VonDeLinde that Dave G. Wills be hired to
fill this seasonal position.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Dave G. Wills as a Seasonal Forestry Aide.
Item 2, Seasonal Road Maintenance Workers --It is therecommenda-
tion of Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart that Clayton
Pearson, Mike Shomion, John Robinson, Kelly Ramswick, Susan
Lindblade and Bryce Johnson be hired to fill these seasonal
positions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Clayton Pearson, Mike Shomion, John Robinson, Kelly Ramswick,
Susan Lindblade and Bryce Johnson as Seasonal Road Maintenance
Workers.
Item 3, Engineering Tech Intern/Assistant--It is the recommendation
of Assistant City Engineer Hefti that Jill Pennie be hired to
fill the temporary 6 month internship position in the Engineering
• Division. Ms_ Pennie is a Civil Engineering student at the
University of Minnesota.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Jill Pennie as an Engineering Tech Intern /Assistant (temporary
position) in the Engineering Division.
Item 4, Road Maintenance Worker --With the resignation/retirement
of Robert Shockley, a vacancy was created in the Road Maintenance
Division of the Public Works Department. It is the recommendation
of Superintendent of Streets and Equipment Erhart, Street Supervisor
Lundsten and Administrative Assistant Duffy that Kurt Schlegel
be hired to fill this vacancy,- effective June 9 and contingent
upon successful completion of the City's physical examination
requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Kurt Schlegel as a Road Maintenance Worker, effective June
9, 1986 and contingent upon, successful completion of the City's
physical examination requirement.
/-d
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Five
Memo
Council Meeting
Personnel Items cont"d.
Item 5, Seasonal Recreation Workers --It is the recommendation
of Recreation Supervisor Peterson and Recreation Supervisor Sunder
that the persons listed on the attachment, which is enclosed
on page -_/7 for you reference, be hired as Seasonal Recreation
Workers.
ACTION
orkers.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
of the listed persons as Seasonal Recreation Leaders.'
/6
the hiring
•
•
BE: SUMMER PLAYGROUND PERSONNEL
I "13003 C404 III)v off -.1 4
Janelle Bonner
Kristi Edlund
Kathleen Fletcher
Tricia Gilbertson
Rachelle Jirik
Chris Kirschner
Lisa Lundquist
Gina Penn
Beth Sistowicz
Jacki Sadek
Tammy Sova
• Kathy Weeklund
Kris Weeklund
PS/js
NEW PERSONNEL
Ben Anderson
Lisa Carlisano
Jodi Carlson
Shelley Carroll
Paula Eaves
Justine Epple
Julie Erickson
Anne Frisbee
Leah Halepeska
Dawn Peterson
Christine Schultz
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Six
EAGAN LIONS CLUB, TEMPORARY BEER LICENSE
C. Eagans Lions Club, Temporary Beer License for 4th of July
Celebration --The Eagan Lions Club has made application for a
temporary beer license for July 2-6 in connection with the annual
4th of July celebration. The Police Department has reviewed
the application and finds the license application to be in order
for review. For a copy of the on -sale beer license, refer to
page /�
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a temporary
beer license for the 4th of July Celebration as requested by
• the Lions Club.
•,
TOTAL FEE IS,00 CITY OF EAGAN NEW
RECEIPT NO. 62778 3830 Pilot Knob Road RENEWAL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122
PREPARE IN DUPLICATE
LICENSE NO.
APPLICATION FOR NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR LICENSE
PLEASE PRINT . DATEN41��9
LAST FIRST MIDDLE MIDDLE
ADDRESS ADDRESS .41ptl
STREET
i
ADDRESS
STREET
TTY STATE ZIP
CITY STATE ZIP
PHONE O BII=TE
MANAGER'S NAME
LAST FIRST MIDDLE
ADDRESS
STATE ZIP
PhUN1; PHONE BIRTBDATE
PLEASE CHECK ------CN SALE_ OFF SALE
HEREBY APPLIES FOR NON -INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE FOR THE. YEAR FROM ee 7— -
TO EVENT- ��� m� L�E/e6�p�iOU - Month Date
Month Date
ARE YOU THE ACTUAL PROPRIETOR? YES ( ) NO (� LOCATION: R� Pa�
,` ADDRESS
ARE YOU THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY OF THE BUSINESS LOCATION? YES ( ) NO
HAS ANY OTHER LICENSE OF THIS KIND BEEN GRANTED TO YOU? YES NO ( ) WH ,C-,, 'A5
ARE YOU A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES? YES (k,/NO ( ) / Ci ,Year
ARE YOU A REGISTEREDVOTER? YES NO(')/CITY
r
HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED? YES ( ) NO CITY
(Other than a.traffic.offense)
If joint amership or if a silent partnership is involved, specify complete names,
birth, addresses and telephone nunber for everyone concerned. YES ( ) NO (-4'
dates of
If YES, please list on the back or on separate sheet, all the information required.
I HEREBY VERIFY THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN OWNERSHIP OR MANAGERS IN THE PAST YEAR.
THE LICENSEE HEREBY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD EAGAN HARMLESS Frm ANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR
SUITS INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND CITHER DEMISE COST'S, WHICH THE CITY OF EAGAN MAY INCUR
BY REASON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE GRANT OF THIS 3.2 BEER LICENSE.
I (we) HEREBY AGREE TO OPERATE SUCHSS IN ACCORDANCE WITH TETE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND
THE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EAGAN. 7E FORE STATLMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE ASID BELIEF.
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE /,\ _ i)11A A,o h�
FOR CITY U ONL
POLICE APPROVAL: YES (e� NO ( ) SI( �D DATED
CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL: YES ( ) NO ( ) SIGNED DATED
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
FAWN RIDGE ADDITION, REVISE AGREEMENT/EXTEND COMPLETION DATES
D. Fawn Ridge Addition, Revise Agreement/Extend Completion Dates --
On July 17, 1984, the final plat was approved for the Fawn Ridge
development located in the southwest corner of Wilderness Run
Road and Dodd Road. As a part of that final plat approval, a
development agreement required that the installation of all required
streets and utilities be completed by December 5, 1985. Subsequent
to that final plat approval, the developer elected to develop
the subdivision in phases. Except for some minor corrective
work, the first phase substantially complied with the completion
dates contained within the development. agreement. However, due
to the fact that the development agreement did not anticipate
this phased development, it must now be amended to reflect the
future completion dates required by the second phase construction.
The staff has reviewed the developer's requested revised comple-
tion dates and have adjusted them accordingly. The Financial
Guarantee is still valid and in full force and effect to guaranty
the completion of this work to the new revised completion dates.
Staff is therefore recommending approval of this amendment to
the development agreement revising the completion dates.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment
to the development agreement for the Fawn Ridge Addition regarding
the extension of the completion dates for the installation of
public improvements.
ao
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eight
VACATION OF COMMON LOT LINE UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT
nTTTT_AM F T_nMV nAW DnnTTTnM
A. Vacation of Common Lot Line Utility and Drainage Easement
of Outlot F,, Lone Oak Addition --On March 4, a petition was received
from the developers of the Lone Oak Addition,requesting the vacation
of the •dedicated common lot line drainage and utility easements
adjacent to Trinity Lone Oak Church and shown on page with
the public hearing being scheduled for April 1.
One, of the conditions of the vacation of this easement was the
conveyance of a similar replacement easement over the new lot •
line created by the lot split for conveyance of property to Trinity
Lone Oak Church. At the April 1 meeting, the developer had not
complied with the rededication requirement and the public hearing
was subsequently continued until May 6. At the May 6 hearing,
the developer had still not complied with this dedication require-
ment and' the hearing was continued one final time to June 3.
As of this date the developer has successfully complied with
the new dedication requirements and the vacation is now in order
for favorable consideration. All notices have been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all concerned parties.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the vacation of the common lot line drainage and
utility easement over that portion of Outlot F as described in
the petition. •
y= -
SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION
FOR.
LAUKKA BECK EAGAN
Most N%yCa-Dutk4jF �,;t P. ,
J I
O
ZI
v
� � NB9•.Z4'44'E
is- 37
S00°9S�/G"E
E
C -Yl
•
I hwaby *WHY "us* lkcrcji4,4--Scojol,
rr Pnowad by ma of WMW my dkrat
OUMPASHM aM Mt 1 as a duly F"Uumd
WL FAIL na oma
BUN.
Mrs :�I r41.r..+ wurcu�
EASEME�J—1 TO
�/AGATED
4445
ION
- /D. 00 ft W/ciC G/ .> 1 n.��a I?
.I _ Utilit�E3sCu�/tt per a141;
�i /50.60
8902444"W �S'iy Lina Out/at F
s.�
zoo 0 1) 1)
SCALE IN FEET
•14 T7. 40011011. •OLCILLD. J1•111. 0.•0./1 INC.
!•M 1 411 IN TI 1T 1., MNNAML]LA N, 1411
NO' 6.840/ FIELD WOK, PAGE. I DRAWN 911: <_ L
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
VACATION OF STREET AND UTILITY EASEMENTS
EAGANDALE LEMAY LAKE ADDITION
B. Vacation of Street and Utility Easements for 'Eagandale Lemay
Lake Addition --With the proposed development of the Eagandale
Lemay Lake 2nd Addition, the certain common lot line drainage
and utility easements dedicated with the First Addition must
be vacated.
While the original petition requested the vacation of a street
easement incorporating a portion of the existing Eagandale Place,
this is no longer necessary as the street easement was never
formally recorded at the County. Therefore, the only ease ent
• required to be vacated at the public hearing is shown on page.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all potentially affected parties with no objections received
to date.
ACTION TO BE .CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To, close the public hearing
and approve the vacation of the common lot line drainage and
utility easement over a portion of Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale
Lemay Lake lst Addition.
.2-3
SKETCH FOR PROPOSED DRAINAGE a UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION:
LOT I, BLOCK I,
LEMAY LAKE I ST
LONE OAK
may'
J
S 880 38 1 3911E
N 00 I `
0)
Ki
60 N O �\
0
N 20 c-'
r
PROPOSED DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT
VACATION IN BLOCK 1
EAGANDALE
ADDITION
ROAD Reviewed By: TAC i
Date: `/- a0 -kL i
145.03
-"19 20 .
sQP r,,
p� .
.4O F
<9
CzN
The 5 foot wide Drainage and Utility
Easement as dedicated on the easterly
5 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, EAGANDALE LEMAY
LAKE 1ST ADDITION, according to the re-
corded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minne-
sota.
a�
i
M
v
N
M
w
N
N
O
Z
q
PROPOSED DRAINAGE
a UTILITY EASEMENT
VACATION
LJJ rl
— 7 V
L_J
1
.y
I.
DENOTES EASEMENT
TO BE VACATED
6-nnele I stinal Samrvcyitt g Inc.
9001 E. 91oomin0lon Freeway (35W)
81mminglen. MN 55420
(912)$81.2455
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
VACATION OF HIGHWAY SLOPE EASEMENT
LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
C. Vacation of Highway Slope Easement for Lot 10, Block 3,
Clearview Addition --On May 6, the Council received a petition
to vacate a 2'5' highway slope easement that had been conveyed
to the City through a formal revocation process by Dakota County.
Enclosed on page o is a copy of the easement proposed to
be vacated. This easement was originally acquired by the County
Highway Department for the upgrading of Cliff Road to its present
urban condition. Because it is no longer needed, the County
agreed to revoke this easement to the City's jurisdiction with
the understanding that the City would proceed with the formal
vacation process so that it could revert to the original landowner.
All notices have published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all potentially interested parties with no objections received
to date.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve the vacation of a 25'' 'highway easement across Lot
10, Block 3, Clearview Addition.
Legal Description of the
Property to be Vacated
A Highway Easement over the following described property;
The South 25 feet of Lot 10, Block 3, of the Clearview
Addition in Eagan described as follows:
Beginning at a point 50 feet north of the SE corner of the
SW 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Section 29, T27N, R23W, thence west
187.56 feet, thence north 280 feet, thence east .189 feet,
thence south 280.01 feet to the point of beginning and there
`� �
terminating said true r ..e iaxel containing 4,689 square uare feet
or 0.108 acres more or less.
-- I Revio=TACEA ST 189.00 M stet
90.0 -%��an
9"
0
2
P.O.L.
PARCEL
f®f
25,200 Sq. Ff.
i 90.0
PP,�
fes.. J::::::. �:.: ,•: ; •. •..
? •o ..Jw_,. , c.1 y-.1-1.�
( CLIFF ROAD)
-N-
"=so
PIOPO.Id >'
M
L_I
3
Ln
No. 32 -
� 0
_
99.o —
s z �s
PARCEL
,
A
27,518 Sq.Ff. IW
1
Ix
I.
f
1 BIW
NI
N
F -• 0 1'•• �J
t
1�.
Y
•
• i4.2 - .
/
.tJ
�..
Y
_-
r=
L
PIOPO.Id >'
M
L_I
3
Ln
No. 32 -
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
OLD' BUSINESS'.
VARIANCE/JAMES UNKER
A. James Unker for a 25' Variance from 50' Setback Requirement
Along Public Street for Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview Addition,
Located East of Lenore Lane & Fronting on Cliff Road, SE 1/4
of Section 29 --An application was submitted to the Planning
Department requesting a 25' front yard setback, north of Cliff
Road in the Clearview Addition. This item was presented for
consideration at the May 21 meeting, however, at the request
of the applicant the agenda item was continued until the June
• 3, City Council meeting. For additional information on this
item, refer to the Plannin9 Department report, a copy of which
is enclosed on pages through 131. There are no
conditions in the Clearview Addition development agreement pertain-
ing to setback restrictions on this lot.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance permit as requested by James Unker.
•
a7
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: JAMES UNKER
LOCATION: LOT 10, BLOCK 3, CLEARVIEW ADDITION
(SE a, SECTION 29)
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 21, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 13, 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
A public hearing has been scheduled at the June 3, 1986, City
® Council meeting for the vacation of the -25' easement area.
The vacation will not affect this variance in any manner.
This lot has not been split, however, all setbacks meet City
Code requirements now and will if, the lot is split as proposed.
There are no conditions in the Clearview Addition Development
Agreement pertaining to setback restrictions on this lot.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all code require-
ments.
JS/jj
0•
V
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted
requesting a
•
25' front yard setback north of Cliff Road in
the Clearview
Addition.
COMMENTS: This one -acre+ lot abutts the Woodgate
2nd Addition
to the east and another acre+ lot to the west.
The applicant
wishes to construct a garage near Cliff Road for 3
main reasons.
1) This garage will visually shield Cliff Road from the existing
house thus, 2) maximizing the private area in the
front yard
and 3) create- a noise "buffer" from Cliff Road.
A letter from
the applicants detailing these hardships is attached for your
review. The neighbors to the west have a garage
30' from the
Cliff Road right-of-way- and the proposed garage
will be 25'
from the same right-of-way.
A public hearing has been scheduled at the June 3, 1986, City
® Council meeting for the vacation of the -25' easement area.
The vacation will not affect this variance in any manner.
This lot has not been split, however, all setbacks meet City
Code requirements now and will if, the lot is split as proposed.
There are no conditions in the Clearview Addition Development
Agreement pertaining to setback restrictions on this lot.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all code require-
ments.
JS/jj
0•
V
NU
0
SIGMA
SUF4VEVING
SERVICES
2wd V46�, 3908 Sibley Memorial Highway
Eagan. Minnesota 55122
Phone: (612), 452-3077
r �(
i_1 I \
\ EAST
r r'- 90.0
5�
I \�
I
—P.O.L.
` o I PARCEL
" 00 I
N I® I
25,200 Sq. Ff.
W;
Z I 90.o h
J I
z'I P.R.
♦i of ��/i -r � o
uj
� o
JI c
eA 5 1�
-• Zoo 00 T R s'� 90.0/
P.P. zs.z tfF
�I (CLIFF ROAD)
—N-
1
Lot Division Certificate For:
Mr. JIM UNKER
• •0
99.0 -
PARCEL
(_j
AI �;
r
LG
<1
27,518 Sq.Ff. IW
1
o r -
x
o
I«
GO
V
/1
I
a
la
C)
,
rlly
---DRIVEWAY _ IQ
�t
$EY,3ECVEMENT
A CV
1I
r o /ok.. FoQ pee
P can1��
r
t
I
—
rfrARea
11
'{' Is
L._.187.56
---- c _.b----
-
3
C.S.A.H. No.
32
April 23, 1986
Re: Application for Setback Variance
Lot 10, Block 3, Cedarview
Dear Mr. Runkle:
Enclosed is our application for a setback variance to allow a
detached garage to be built 25 feet from the south boundary of our
property at Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview, 1775 Cliff Road. This would
require a variance of either 25 or 50 feet depending on the status of
a 25 foot easement which Dakota County has agreed to revoke, and the
City of Eagan has agreed to vacate. Assuming the easement is vacated,
the variance would be 25 feet.
We are requesting the variancebecauseof hardships resulting from •
unusual characteristics of our property. The primary concern is the
high level of noise from traffic on Cliff Road. Our house is situated
near the rear of the lot to reduce the noise level, but noise is
still very bothersome. Locating the garage closer to Cliff Road will
increase the area that will be shielded from noise by the garage. It
will also decrease the area that will be subject to viewing from
Cliff Road, thereby increasing our privacy. Because the house is near
the rear of the lot, our primary yard area is between the house and
Cliff Road, so increasing privacy is very important. If we have to
locate the garage closer to the house, our usable yard area will be
greatly decreased.
The setback variance would not affect our neighborssince our
neighbors to the west, the Amundsons, have a garage that is about the
same distance to Cliff Road, 30.8 feet from their south lot line. Our •
neighbors to the east, in Woodgate, 2nd Addition are separated from
us by an outlot that is about 125 feet wide, our lot is barely
visible from their lots, and their lots face away from ours. The
garage would be well below the level of Cliff Road so that it would
not be conspicuous.
Attached is a copy of a recent survey showing the location of our
house and the Amundsons' garage, with the proposed garage, setback
line and easement area sketched in. The survey was done for a lot
split application which we may pursue in the future.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
V ry tr}aly yours,
J e/7/
s/qT'.' Unker
Nancy A Unker 3
1775 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Mr. Dale C. Runkle
City Planner
Eagan Municipal Center
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Application for Setback Variance
Lot 10, Block 3, Cedarview
Dear Mr. Runkle:
Enclosed is our application for a setback variance to allow a
detached garage to be built 25 feet from the south boundary of our
property at Lot 10, Block 3, Clearview, 1775 Cliff Road. This would
require a variance of either 25 or 50 feet depending on the status of
a 25 foot easement which Dakota County has agreed to revoke, and the
City of Eagan has agreed to vacate. Assuming the easement is vacated,
the variance would be 25 feet.
We are requesting the variancebecauseof hardships resulting from •
unusual characteristics of our property. The primary concern is the
high level of noise from traffic on Cliff Road. Our house is situated
near the rear of the lot to reduce the noise level, but noise is
still very bothersome. Locating the garage closer to Cliff Road will
increase the area that will be shielded from noise by the garage. It
will also decrease the area that will be subject to viewing from
Cliff Road, thereby increasing our privacy. Because the house is near
the rear of the lot, our primary yard area is between the house and
Cliff Road, so increasing privacy is very important. If we have to
locate the garage closer to the house, our usable yard area will be
greatly decreased.
The setback variance would not affect our neighborssince our
neighbors to the west, the Amundsons, have a garage that is about the
same distance to Cliff Road, 30.8 feet from their south lot line. Our •
neighbors to the east, in Woodgate, 2nd Addition are separated from
us by an outlot that is about 125 feet wide, our lot is barely
visible from their lots, and their lots face away from ours. The
garage would be well below the level of Cliff Road so that it would
not be conspicuous.
Attached is a copy of a recent survey showing the location of our
house and the Amundsons' garage, with the proposed garage, setback
line and easement area sketched in. The survey was done for a lot
split application which we may pursue in the future.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
V ry tr}aly yours,
J e/7/
s/qT'.' Unker
Nancy A Unker 3
1775 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
s
1®
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
REQUEST FOR SPECIAL DEER HUNT
A. Department of Natural Resources for Request for Special Deer
Hunt in Fort Snelling State Park, November 8 and 9, 1986, and
November 15 and 16, 1985 --The City has received a request from
Jon Parker, Area Wildlife Manager representing the State of
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,for an exemption from
the firearm ordinance that would allow a public deer hunt in
Fort Snelling State Park on November 8 and 9 and November 15
and 16, 1986. The City Council amended Chapter 10 of the City
Code (page 229) to allow a special hunting season to be established
by the City Council for the purposes of wildlife management.
Special weekends have been designated in both 1984 and 1985 as
indicated in the attached letter. For additional .information
regarding the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources request
for a special deer hunt, refer to pages 33 through
Also enclosed is a news release for the Department of Natural
Resources regarding the DNR's appeal to the metropolitan cities
to help solve the deer population problem. A copy of that DNR
release is enclosed on pages ,5Y through 3 9 .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
exemption from the firearm ordinance, allowing a
hurt in Fort Snelling State Park on November 8 and 9
15 and 16, 1986.
jz
or deny an
public deer
and November
rMCDEPARTMENT
�S�7T2ATE OF
V�lJ IEZ(Olrz=J OF NATURAL RESOURCES
PHONENO. 296-2553 1200 Warner Rd., St. Paul, MN 55106 FILENO.
May 15, 1986
Tom Hedges
City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Mr. Hedges:
• We are requesting an exemption from the firearm ordinance
within the City of Eagan to hold a public deer hunt in Fort
Snelling State Park on November 8 and 9, 1986 and on Novem-
ber 15 and 16, 1986.
The overpopulation problem in the Minnesota Valley is still
very serious despite the reductions due to our hunting in
1984 and 1985. The attached bar graph shows the results of
our winter censuses since 1982. The dotted lines are the
population densities we would be experiencing if we had not
held hunts in 1984 and 1985.
Three observations are apparent from the chart. First, the
deer herd in the Park is st i l l over twice as large as the
Park can support in the long run. Second, the deer overpop-
ulation problem has grown much worse outside the boundaries
of the Park. And third, that the deer hunts in 1984 and
1985 have spared the Park the kind of increases in deer
numbers that have occurred outside the Park.
The second chart we have attached shows the incidence of
deer/car collisions In the neighborhood of the Park since
1979. As you can see, the problem is still on the increase.
Damage to Park vegetation has grown worse. Browse surveys
last year were discontinued in December since all available
browse had been utilized by that time, and the scarcity of
healthy woody vegetation made sampling impossible.
We are proposing the following actions to correct this
problem:
1. To expand the public hunt in the Park to include two
weekends, and to hold the hunt earlier in the season to
try and avoid the severe weather that so hampered last
year's hunt. Our goal is to remove 100 deer from the
Park. As was the case last year, all hunters will be
33
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Tom Hedges
May 15. 1986
Page Two
offered the opportunity to take a bonus deer. The
bonus deer will be antlerless only. Compartments FI
and F2 will be combined this year into a single compart-
ment with 65 permits issued, the same as the total
Permits issued last year. Permits in this.zone will be
for shotgun only. As before, hunters will be required
to hunt from elevated stands.
2. If the expanded hunt fails to removed 100 deer, DNR
marksmen will remove additional deer to reach our goal.
3. The Department will be.working with private landowners
and neighboring municipalities to increasethe number
of deer removed on lands adjacent to the Park. Remov-
als outside the Park are essential if we are to solve.
the overpopulation problem.
If you need any further information, please feel free to
contact Craig Cox at 296-2553 or Jon Parker at 445-9393. We
look forward to meeting with you and the City Council, to
discuss this matter.
Sin rely,
Craig A Cox
Region Re urce Management Specialist
n Parker
Area Wildlife Manager
CC205:Ik 3
MINNESOTA VALLEY DEER CENSUS: 1982-1986
100 —1
90 ( ---,
80 --
Fort Snelling Lonq Meadove L Total Ares Population Densities
M(FS) Black Dog (TOT( without 1994, 1985 _ __-
-1 (LLB) bunts --�
PJ �
70
w
roi
60
y
w
q �
r 50 i
o
- T
ro
0
40
a
30
carryin920
capacity
10
(FS) (LCB) (TOT) (FS) mm (TOP) (FS) ("B) (TOT)(FS) (LLB) (TOf) (FS) (LLB) (TOT)
1982 �3 1984 ® 1985 1986
YEAR
# OF COLLISIONS
140
130
120
110
100.
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
DEER/CAR COLLISIONS 1979 --1985
FORT SNELLING AREA
YEAR.
36
AIRPORT AREA
MENDOTA HTS
EAGAN
TRAILS
H.k,,
H
A
FACII
nII
T: 41
H.Io,. For, Snall.n.
7
Cance Landing
IT
P
SCALE
L
L
L2
7—
Si 1Aj
Lau,
F.21
pi;,
C: Boal Lending
T: 41
7
Cance Landing
IT
"I'venine canae,
Parking
M
Shall.,
Pd,P
rarlooks
PRIVATE PROPERTY
Pubic We Piona,ded
SCALE
L
L
L2
7—
Si 1Aj
Lau,
F.21
37 Fort Snellinq State Park
pi;,
T: 41
IT
M
mL
c
147
37 Fort Snellinq State Park
rMCDESTATE OF
PARTMENT
HCZO`4LQ
BOX 500 LAFAYETTE
DNR INFORMATION
(612) 296-6157
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
OF NATURAL RESOURCES
ROAD • ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA • '55146
May 20, 1986
DNR NEEDS HELP IN SOLVING
METRO DEER PROBLEM
The deer herd in the Minnesota Valley within the Twin Cities and its suburbs has
grown to the point that it is endangering its own food sources, destroying the growth
of new vegetation and posing a severe hazard to motorists, says the. Department of
Natural Resources.
The problem is the most critical in the suburbs of Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan
and Mendota Heights -- in general, the area between the Mendota Bridge and I-35 W.
Included in the area of over -population is Ft. Snelling State Park, the Minnesota •
Valley National Wildlife Refuge and large tracts of private land. Although limited
deer hunts were held in 1984 and 1985, too few deer were taken and the herd has
continued to expand.
In 1984, the first year the Park and Refuge were opened, hunters removed 57 deer.
DNR parks and wildlife officials said they hoped hunters would remove 100 deer
annually during 1985, 1986 and 1987.
In an attempt to reach this objective, hunters last year were offered the
opportunity to take two deer, but only 52 deer were taken due to the extreme cold and
wind that hampered hunters.
The rate of removal has fallen way behind the reproduction of the herd, according
to DNR wildlife officials, and the situation is getting worse every year.
A census of the deer herd in February showed a density of 69 deer per square mile
within the Ft. Snelling, Long Meadow, Black Dog area -- triple the figure that
wildlife biologists have calculated the area can support without severe long term
damage to vegetation.
The number of deer -auto collisions has increased sharply in the Ft. Snelling area
since 1978 when fewer than 10 were recorded. By 1984, the number bad risen to nearly
90, and the figure for 1985 was 138.
Officials say it is essential that at least 300 deer be removed from the
Minnesota River Valley Refuge and Park area this year to avoid a possible major
die -off of the herd from starvation, and to reduce deer -auto collision problems and
harm to vegetation.
(MORE)
3g
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
:�
Page 2
METRO DEER PROBLEM (Cont'd)
To attain this goal, the DNR is proposing to continue holding controlled deer
hunts in the area. Under these proposals, if adverse weather conditions or other
factors reduce the bag significantly below the 300 figure, DNR personnel selected for
their marksmanship will take the additional animals from public land, supplying the
meat to charitable institutions.
DNR wildlife chief Roger Holmes said use of sharpshooters for herd reduction is
the last option used by most wildlife agencies to control over -population, but
sometimes becomes necessary. He cited the occasion several years ago at the Twin
Cities arms plant in Arden Hills, a deer control program in the city of North Oaks,
and the recent problems at Fort Snelling Cemetery.
He said, "Local communities understand the situation and have cooperated with the
Department by allowing hunting within their boundaries; however, one of the problems
® encountered in trying to remove enough deer from the area is that much of the private
land is closed to hunting. The DNR will be working closely with all of the local
communities to develop a long-term solution to the problem."
This fall, the Department is proposing to have the season open for two weekends
instead of one, and allow hunters to take two deer. Officials will also try to
persuade private landowners to permit hunters on their property.
"These proposals will need the understanding and support of the property owners,
local officials and the public," he concluded.
-30-
•
a
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Thirteen
Memo
Council Meeting
HOME ESTATES, INC./VARIANCE REQUEST
B. Home Estates, Inc. for a 20' Variance from a 40'" Setback
Requirement Along Public Street for Lot 2,, Blockl, Whispering
Woods --Home Estates, Inc.,, Terry Hilla•, has submitted an applica-
tion requesting a 20' setback variance from Slaters Road for
Lot 2, Block 1, Whispering Woods Addition. For additional informa-
tion on this item, refer o the Planning Department report, a
copy is attached on pages through.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or
variance request as presented by Home Estates, Inc.
40
n
deny the
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: HOME ESTATES, INC., TERRY HILLA
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, WHISPERING WOODS ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE.DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. JUNE 3, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 2.9, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
20' setback variance from Slaters Road for Lot 2, Block 1, Whisper-
ing Woods Addition.
COMMENTS: In past actions taken by the Eagan City Council, a
20' setback variance for Lots 1, 8, 9 and 10 have been granted
in the past. What this 20' variance allowsis a rear setback
of 30' or 80' from centerline of Slaters Road. It has been
noted that Slaters Road has an excess right-of-way also requiring
excess setback from that right-of-way. In past actions, these
variances have been granted and Lot 2, Block 1, was overlooked.
The access to this lot will be f:-om Slaters Court, the cul-de-sac
providing access to the rest of the lots. The variance is for
a rear setback and if the variance is approved, would be contingent
on a restricted access on Slaters Road. All other City ordinances
shall be adhered to.
•
DCR/JJ
?. 1; „12>
I /
I 1 11 u
'L
S 89° 3'N2"
PER Dact..nE uJ 1{ Z
N.
379996 �.�.
{ O
•z 'Q: yN.
36 O
i 0'
•
s.neCR
Truorckawc
r
,ac z
� f;P
l_EGHL
►JoRrr(d s f,>s, o
yFharzIPT(ol-r
TC
Ju�4EA&IN45 CrbGu-;,0� n
O�END7rtfi (96" MONUMWIM
:Im
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the
laws of the State of Minnesota,
' Dates
-Roy
.
Le IM Bohlen
v
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986 City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY/VARIANCE REQUEST
C. Sunshine Construction Company for a 5' Side Yard Setback
Variance for Lot 6, Block 2, Birchpark Addition --An application
was submitted by Sunshine Construction Company for a 5' side
yard setback variance for a single family home located on Lot
6, Block 2, Birchpark Addition. For additional information on
this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is
attached on pages_t[ through.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance request as presented by Sunshine Construction Company.
•
•
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: SUNSHINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 2, BIRCH PARK ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 RESIDENTIAL SINGLE DISTRICT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. JUNE 3, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 29, 1986
REPORTED BY: EAGAN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION: An application. has been submitted requesting a
5' side setback variance for a single-family home located on
Lot 6, Block 2, Birch Park Addition.
COMMENTS: The lots along Windcrest Avenue are all 65' in width
and are a buffer between the Windcrest Planned Development,
which is a combination of townhomes and duplexes. The 65' single-
family lots are made to be a transition between the Windcrest
and Birch Park Addition. It is the City's understanding that
the, homes along Windcrest Avenue are higher value than what
were originally intended. The home presently is 50' in width
and would require to be 451, meeting the normal setback requirement.
The 10' side setback to the house portion has been set, however,
a 5' variance will be needed for the living portion behind the
garage. Presently', the garage is 5' from the east property
line, but the living portion behind the garage would require
a 10' setback and this is where the variance is requested.
• If approved, all other City ordinances shall be adhered to.
DCR/J J.
-SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE SIENNA CORPORATION
WINDCREST AVENUE
N 86'17'09" IS A
65.00 (B88.iJ
LOT 6
•
r
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Fifteen
Memo
Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/RMC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
D. RMC Development Corporation for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 2, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition --The City
has received an application from the RMC Development Corporation
requesting that duplex lot splits occur on Lot 2 of Sun Cliff
First Addition.. This request will split two identical 40'X 130.02'
lots and is considered a waiver of plat for recording purposes.
Enclosed on pagesthrough y is a copy of a report
prepared by the Planning Department that describes the parcel
and action required by the City Council.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for Lot 2, Sun Cliff First Addition.
WAIVER OF PLAT/RMC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
E. RMC Development Corporation for a Waiver of Plat to Split
Existing Duplex on Lot 3, Block 1, Sun Cliff Addition --An applica-
tion to split a duplex lot was submitted by RMC Development
Corporation for Lot 3, Sun Cliff lst Add -tion. This lot has
an irregular shape and the front property lines of the two new
lots will measure 38.95 feet and 36.31 feet. This application
was submitted at the same time as the waiver of plat for Lot
2, by RMC Development Corp. and, therefore, the requests were
combined into one report which is referenced in the previous
item.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat for RMC Development Corporation, Lot 3, Sun Cliff
First Addition.
�-6
LOT 3: Is irregular shaped with 75.26' of total frontage.
The front property lines of the new lots will measure
38.95' and 36.31'.
The building structures meet all City setback requirements and
separate utilities are provided for each unit.
If approved, these duplex lot splits shall be subject to all
• applicable Code requirements.
JS/3J
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT:
(2.) WAIVER OF PLATS
APPLICANT:
R.M.C. DEVELOPMENT CORP
LOCATION:
LOTS 2 & 3 SUN CLIFF IST ADDN
EXISTING ZONING:
P.D. 79-1
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:.
JUNE 3, 1986
DATE OF REPORT:
MAY 27, 1986
REPORTED BY:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Two separate applications have been
submitted
,® by R.M.C. Development '.Corp.. requesting duplex lot
splits on
Lots 2 and 3 of the Sun
Cliff 1st Addition. Both
lots have
frontage on Deer Hills Trail.
LOT 2: Measures 80' x 130.02'
and will be split into 2
identical
40' x 130.02' lots.
LOT 3: Is irregular shaped with 75.26' of total frontage.
The front property lines of the new lots will measure
38.95' and 36.31'.
The building structures meet all City setback requirements and
separate utilities are provided for each unit.
If approved, these duplex lot splits shall be subject to all
• applicable Code requirements.
JS/3J
0
SUN CL/FF ADDITIONS
City of Eogan
Off f..e A/:
ADVANCE DEVELOPERS INC
J
u•c..m +o.e
10/
10,
:t. t
,A w
t.
�� • Yrn^ Mir....•.. \.
1•..r !� .wr e..^
LA
�� • Yrn^ Mir....•.. \.
1•..r !� .wr e..^
U
ti
%fie S
Scale: 1"=30'
0.,, X00
O Denotes Iron Monument
0
j t 1✓�
L wBde
"p 0 �{
3 4 .�i `1
S
so, e
a
The southeasterlv 40.00 feet OL.LQt.2 Block 1,
SUN CLIFF FIRST ADDITION, Dako _, Minnesota.
Scale: 1' - 30'
O Denotes Iron Monument
N
�s
The northwesterly 38.95 feet of
a,. Block 1, SUN CLIFF FIRST AD,
Shkota County, Minnesota.
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen .
DEVELOPERS ESCROW AGREEMENT
F. Developers Escrow Agreement --In May of 1985, the Council
directed the development and implementation of a development
escrow policy to insure that developers within this community
pay for the costs incurred by staff and outside consulting services
that are necessary to review, process and inspect their proposed
development. During the past 12 months, this policy has been
formulated and gradually implemented into the City's operations.
On April 15, the proposed Development Escrow Agreement contained
on pages5�L through 49 D was forwarded to the Council for
preliminary review.
Due to the fact that this is a modification to the Subdivision
Ordinance, Chapter 13 of the City Code, a formal public hearing
was held before the Planning Commission at their May 27 meeting.
At that time, there were no significant comments from the public
and the Planning Commission unanimously endorsed its formal
adoption by the Council. The Public Works Director will be
available to discuss the details of this agreement and escrow
policy at the June T meeting, as may be necessary.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment
to the Subdivision Ordinance;, Chapter 13, regarding the development
escrow policy.
40
CITY OF EAGAN
DEVELOPMENT ESCROW AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, mace and entered into on the _ day of ,
198_, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a municipality of the State of
Minnesota, (hereinafter called the CITY), and the Developer identified herein.
A. The term "Developer" as use herein refers to:
Whose address is
• WHEREAS, the Developer has applied to the City for approval of the plat or
subdivision known as located within the City; and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the granting of said approval, the City is
likely to incur certain costs including administrative and consulting costs
involved in the processing of such application, and the City requires a
guaranty that such costs will be paid by the Developer to avoid unnecessary
billings to Developers; and "
WHEREAS, under authority granted to it, including Minnesota Statutes
® Chapters 412 and 462, the City will process the application on the condition
that the Developer enter into this Development Escrow Agreement, which
agreement defines certain duties and responsibilities of the Developer, as
well as the City, and the Developer shallprovide a bona, letter of credit, or
collateral agreement in the amount and with conditions satisfactory to the
City, providing for the securing to the City the ultimate payment of all such
costs incurred by the City; and .
WHEREAS, the City shall account to the Developer for the expenditure of
the escrow funds on a periodic basis; .
el
1
NOW THEREFORE, the City and Developer agree as follows:
1. Preliminary Plat Application Escrow. It is understood that the City
shall commence to process the preliminary plat application at such time as
this Agreement is executed by all appropriate parties and the escrow requirea
hereunder is posted in a form acceptable to the City.
2. Final Plat Application/Contract Management Escrow. If at the time of
submission of the application for final plat approval, the developer has
determined to install any public street or utility improvements privately,
then the oeveloper shall submit two separate escrows in amounts and with •
formats satisfactory to the City as follows:
a. A final plat application escrow relating to processing final plat
applications, review .of required submittals and preparation of related
agreements, payable at the time the final plat application is submitted to the
City.
D. A contract management escrow paid at the time of the execution and
release of the final plat by the City covering inspection, agreement
compliance, contract management, ana other necessary'costs for City approval •
and/or acceptance of privately installed City improvements, and other relates
development requirements.
3. Use of Escrow Funds. The City may draw upon the escrows to pay its
costs necessarily related to the specific purpose for which the escrow was
posted and the City shall determine all of its costs incurred', including both
administrative and consulting services, at the rates normally charged by the
City or its consultants, determined according to City standards. A copy of
the current administrative and consulting rates is attached which rates are
subject to change by the 'City Council without notice to the Developer. (See
Exhibit "A").
2
4. Conditions of Escrow. The following conditions shall apply to the
subdivision application escrow contemplated under this Agreement:
a. City Administrative hourly rates for .processing applications shall be
determined at two times the normal hourly rate including all benefits and
overhead incurred by the City. (See paragraph 3)
b. Payment shall be made to City consultants, including but not limited
to engineering, legal and planning, in the amounts actually billed to the
City, according to the customary consulting rates in effect at that time. (See
• paragraph 3). Such consulting services or costs shall reasonably and
necessarily relate to the subject matter of the applications as determined by
the City.
C. The City shall determine which escrow accounts shall be billed in
relation to each phase of the application process and any balances remaining
in any particular escrow account may be transferred to escrows required for
any other applications or projects being processed through the City by the
same developer.
•
U. The City shall not be responsible for paying any interest on the
escrow accounts contemplated under this Agreement.
e. In the event that there is an inadequate balance in the escrow
account, the City will determine and require additional deposits to the escrow
account to insure continued coverage of costs required for the completion of
the processing of the application.
5. Balances in Escrows. In the event that there are any balances in the
escrow accounts upon completion of the development process, or in the event
that an application is withdrawn by the developer, denied by the City or for
any reason, is not completed within the time frame required by the City, then
the balances shall be refunded as follows:
3
a. The City shall pay such balances to the applicant/developer unless
written instructions are submitted to the City and signed by the developer and
the proposed recipient of the funds, prior to repayment by the City.
b. In the event that any developer desires to assign its interest in its
escrow, then the developer shall notify the City in writing of the assignment
of its interest.
C. In the event that the City fails to refund any balance in an escrow
account contemplated under this Agreement, then the developer may request
payment from the City ana the refuna shall be mane by the City within .ninety
(90) days of written notice to the City that the application has been
terminated ana only after all costs covering the application or project have
been paid in full.
6. Escrow Amounts. The escrow amounts contemplated for each of the
purposes described unser this Agreement which may be revised by the City from
time to time shall be as follows:
a. Preliminary Plat Application Escrow. A cash escrow at the time of
submission of the preliminary plat application in amounts according to Exhibit
b. Final Plat Application Escrow. A cash final plat application escrow
for privately financed improvements payable at the time of submission of the
final plat application, in the amounts provided in Exhibit "B".
C. Contract Management Escrow. The contract management escrow submittea
prior to release of the final plat by the City in the amounts provided in
Exhibit "B". At least one-third of such escrow shall be in cash with the
remaining amounts in such form acceptable to the City.
5�z
I
7. Reduction of Non -Cash Contract Management Escrow. That portion of the
non-cash contract management escrow contemplated herein may be,reaucea upon
written request of the developer and upon consent of the City, prior to
completion of all requirements contemplated under the preliminary.plat escrow
provisions of this Agreement. It is understood that all amounts contemplated
under this Agreement shall be capable of being converted into cash, and
recoverable on demand by the City, which determination shall be made solely
within the discretion of the City.
• 8. Accounting. The City will provide an accounting of all expenses
charged against each escrow account when requested by a developer but in no
event more often than monthly and also such accounting will be provided when a
request is made by the City to replenish the cash portion of any escrow.
9. Terms of Breach. In the event of breach of any terios of this
Agreement by the developer, the City may at its option, terminate this
Agreement and order the developer to cease any further development or progress
under the terms of this Agreement.
• 10. Validity. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause,
paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be invalid,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Agreement.
li. Binding Agreement. The parties mutually recognize and agree that all
terms and conditions of this Agreement shall run with the Lana herein
described and shall be binding upon the heirs, successors, administrators and
assigns of the developers referenced in this Agreement.
12. Amendments. The terms of this Agreement shall not be amended without
the written consent of all parties hereto.
�5
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals
CITY OF EAGAN
(Date:
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
DEVELOPER:
By: l
Date 40
Approved as to Content: Its:
Department of Public Works And: /
(Date: ) Date
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Hauge, Eiae a Keller, P. A.
Attorneys for the City of Eagan
1200 Yankee Doodle Road
Water. View Office Tower, Suite 3.03
Eagan, MN 55122
(612) 454-4224
56
i
Its:
40
Exhibit A
HAUGE, EIDE & KELLER, P.A.
City Attorney
General Legal Services
Paralegal Fees
Page 1 of 3
RATE PER HOUR
$ 60.00
$20.00- $25.00
WESTWOOD PLANNING & ENGINEERING COMPANY
(Parks)
6,7
CLASSIFICATION
RATE PER HOUR
Principal Engineer
$ 54.00
•
Principal Planner
54.00
Principal Landscape Architect
54.00
Engineer
42.00
Senior Planner
42.00
Senior Landscape Architect
42.00
Associate Planner or Landscape Architect
28.50
Senior Construction Coordinator
40.00
Senior Engineering Technician & Construction
Observer 34.00
Engineering Technician
28.50
Draftsman
22.00
Typist
15.00
Two -Man Survey Crew
61.00
Three -Man Survey Crew
73.00
6,7
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES
CLASSIFICATION
Principal Engineer
Registered Engineer
Graduate Engineer & Field Supervisor
Senior Draftsman
Senior Technician
Technician
Word Processor
Clerical
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
Reproduction, Printing, Dupicating
Out -of -Pocket Expenses such as Meals,
Lodging, Stakes, Telephone Calls,
Etc.
Mileage
RATE PER HOUR
$49.50
45.00
36.00
33.50
30.00
22.00
22.50
17.00
At
Invoice
Cost
•
At
Actual
Cost
URBAN PLANNING & DESIGN, INC.
STAFF
Principal Planner (1)
Planner II (2)
Landscape Architect I (3)
Landscape Architect II (2)
Draftsman
Secretary
Research Assistant
Mileage (per mile)
Materials
$0.20/Mile
RATE PER HOUR
$ 50.00
38.00
33.00
25.00
20.00
10.50
20.00
.24
Cost
('1) "Planner -In -Charge" as designated by the State of Minnesota
for 701 Planning and minimum five (5) years experience.
(2) Masters or undergraduate degree and minimum three (3) years
experience.
(3) Minnesota Registration by State Board and minimum five (5)
years experience. 5�y
•
•
•
Exhibit A
CITY STAFF
Director of Public Works
Assistant City Engineer
Engineering Technician I
Engineering Technician II
Engineering Technician III
Engineering Intern
City Planner
Planner I
Planning Aide
Director of Parks & Recreation
Landscape Architect
Police Captain
Maintenance Worker
Page 3 of 3
1986 HOURLY RATES *
$46.32
33.24
17.49
20.98
24.11
12.50
39.01
23.80
17.31
39.75
25.97
38.93
24.04
* Employees subject to overtime provisions of FLSA are billed
50% higher when overtime is required.
159
Exhibit B
Preliminary Plat Application Escrow
$ 50 Per Acre
$250• Minimum
$800 Maximum
Final Plat Application Escrow
$150 Per Acre
$500 Maximum
Contract Management Escrow
Estimated Construction Costs
$ 0 - $150,000
$150,001 - $500,000
$500,001 +
Page 1 of 1
LI
Escrow
4% ($ 500 Minimum)
3% ($ 6,000 Minimum)
2.5% ($15,000 Minimum)
* Costs will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary
to be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring arms -length
transaction costs.
M
Agenda Information
June 3, 19'86, City
Page Seventeen
Memo
Council Meeting
FUTURE STATUS OF DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE
G. Future Status of the Developers Task Force --With the implementa-
tion of the developers escrow policy, the Planning Commission
and City Council requested that a Developers Task Force be formula-
ted to review the policy and prepare an appropriate agreement
to facilitate the implementation of this new policy. The Developers
Task Force has. met several times, during the past 8 months and
completed its primary purpose through adoption of the proposed
Development Escrow Agreement at its last meeting on April 9,
1986.
• The members of the Task Force and Planning Commission fully
endorse the continuation of this committee to address similar
future significant issues relating to development within our
community. Several of the possible items for review are contained
in the April 9 minutes enclosed on page( In addition,
at the May 27 Planning Commission, it was unanimously recommended
that the Task Force be maintained as an ongoing committee available
to the Planning Commission and Council to review and recommend
solutions to development related problems that may be identified
by staff, Planning Commission or Council.
Therefore, due to the fact that the initial duties of the Task
Force have been completed, it is appropriate for the Council
to determine whether the Task Force should remain as an ongoing
committee or should be disbanded.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To disband or continue
the Developers Task Force.
6f
MINUTES OF THE DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
APRIL 9, 1986
A meeting of the Developer's Task Force was convened by
City Administrator Hedges at 3:15 p.m. on April 9, 1986, in the
conference rooms of the Municipal. Center building. Those in
attendance were Pat Hoffman, Advanced Developers; Mark Johnson,
Mark Johnson Construction; Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation; Tom
Hedges, City Administrator; Tom Colbert, Public Works Director;
Gene Van Overbeke, Finance Director; Dale Peterson, Chief
Building Inspector; Paul Hauge, City Attorney; and Jon
Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant. Those persons -absent were
Gary Fuchs, Eagan Construction; Mayor Blomquist, City Council
representative; and Lori Trygg, Advisory Planning Commission
representative.
• MINUTES
Minutes of the March 19, 1986 and March 27, 1986,
Developers Task Force meetings were reviewed and accepted.
TASK FORCE
City Administrator Hedges reviewed Task Force member Loren
Spande's resignation and offered six candidates as possible
replacements. The candidates each received an equal number of
votes in the original Task Force balloting. The candidates were
Robert Tilsen, Raymond Sonnek, Lou LaPierre, Brad Swenson, Dan
Gustafson and Larry Frank. The group continued discussion of
this item until after the escrow agreement had been reviewed.
City Administrator Hedges left the meeting at 3:25 p.m. to
keep another engagement. Director of Public Works Colbert then
led the meeting as its facilitator.
DEVELOPMENT ESCROW
The Task Force took up the escrow agreement as amended
pursuant to their earlier deliberations by City Attorney Hauge.
Member Hardy raised concern that the Letter of Credit required in
the City's development agreement covers some of the same costs
anticipated by the escrow agreement. Considerable discussion was
held concerning the potential for developer funds to be committed
through two mechanisms for the same cost. The Director of Public
Works agreed to amend Exhibit C, to the financial guarantee of
the standard development contract used by the City, to reflect a
108 credit for private developments which have met the escrow
requirements. In further discussion, the Task Force indicated it
would be necessary to attach, as an exhibit to the agreement,
1
Developers Task Force Minutes
April 9, 1986
those City fees which may be charged against escrow accounts
covered by the agreement and that certain signatures need be
attached to all agreements to assure accountability even if the
form remains essentially unchanged.
Concern was also expressed that the agreement is to be
signed at the time of the preliminary plat application but that
it binds developers at subsequent development times. Member
Hardy pointed out that the agreement isnot. filed with the County
Court and is therefore not discoverable through a title search.
This might create unknown obligations if a project changed hands
and the escrow was not a part of the sale agreement. It was
determined that the amount of money involved would not be
significant, in most instances, and it would often be to the
benefit of the purchaser if certain costs were guaranteed by it.
After further discussion Hardy moved, Colbert seconded, to
approve the Development Escrow Agreement, as amended, and
forward it for review and approval by the APC and City Council,
such review to include a public hearing before the Advisory
Planning Commission on May 27, 1986. All members voted in favor.
TASK FORCE
The Task Force took up their consideration of a
recommendation of a replacement member for Loren Spande.
There was discussion concerning the need to balance various
perspectives on the Task Force and it was suggested that a
combination builder/developer could better identify various sides
of an issue and serve the Task Force well in that regard. Member
Johnson suggested that any future discussions .of task force
representation be in terms of balancing interests of commercial,
single family and multi -family development. After further •
discussion, the development representatives of the Task Force
suggested that Dan Gustafson, D.H. Gustafson Company, and Larry
Frank, Northland Mortgage, be contacted and recommended, as their
first and second recommendations, for appointment to membership
on the Developers Task Force.
TOPICS FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION
Public Works Director introduced the item and indicated
that the City Council would determine whether the Developers Task
Force will continue to meet. To clarify to the Council which
issues might be considered, should the Task Force tenure be
extended, the group was asked if it wished to prepare a list of
issues that could be addressed at future meetings. A general
discussion of the duties and responsibilities of the Developers
Task Force followed. There was general discussion concerning the
need that, the Task Force not be viewed as an arbitor of specific
disputes, but that it be a sounding board and means of
communication between the development community, City Council,
63
2
Developers Task Force Minutes
April 9, 1986
Advisory Planning Commission and City staff. After further
discussion of the need to maintain the means of communication
provided by the Task Force, the group developed a list of nine
possible topics for future discussion. The topics were:
1. Construction debris and erosion control.
2. Inspection and coordination of grading plans and
schedules for public and private development
improvements.
3. Coordination of residential or business occupancy to
insure the availability of services.
4. Dissemination of development information during the
application process.
40 5. The Five and Ten -Year Capital Improvements Program
priorities.
6. Zoning and long range planning 'review and
recommendations.
7. Financing public improvements and tax exempt municipal
bonds.
8. Evaluation of the concept of a board of appeals to
review deviations from Building Code Requirements.
9. Evaluation and identification of community amenities
and recreational service needs.
® It was suggested that such discussions not be viewed as an
alternative to the review process the City currently has, but as
a means of providing additional input from the development
community on issues pertaining to it. Based upon these topics,
the Developers Task Force suggested that the City Council
consider. authorizing the group to continue to meet.
The meeting adjourned at 5:20 p.m.
City Clerk
Dated
3
JDH
E
Is
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Eighteen
Memo
Council Meeting
RESOLUTION/PROPOSED LAND DIVISIONS
H. Resolution/Dakota County Notification of Proposed Land
Divisions --The City of Eagan is still experiencing problems with
the recording of land divisions by Dakota County when the property
has not been properly platted or a waiver of plat approved by
the City Council. On at least two (2)occasions the City Council
has approved action and submitted a request to Dakota County
asking that no property divisions be approved without a waiver
of plat or formal platting by the City of Eagan. The recording
of property divisions without awareness by the City of Eagan
has caused problems for the Special Assessments Division, water
and sewer utility billing and other City records. The Director
of Finance has contacted the Dakota County auditor and according
to Norma Marsh, if the City Council considers a subdivision
regulation resolution and upon its approval, submits the same
to the Dakota County for enforcement, all land divisions will
be returned to the City of Eagan unless they are properly platted
or have a waiver of plat of record with the City. Attached on
page 64 is a copy of a resolution entitled "Resolution Requesting
Notification of Proposed Land Divisions and Transfer of Unplatted
Properties" for your review.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
resolution as stated.
G5
To approve or deny the
RESOLUTION
CITY OF RAGAN
REQUESTING NOTIFICATION OF PROPOSED LAND DIVISIONS
AND TRANSFER OF UNPLATTED PROPERTIES
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has adopted regulations
governing the subdivision of land within its boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 provides
for certain restrictions on transfers of real property lying
within municipalities; and
WHEREAS, said statute provides for municipalities to
elect to be governed by said statute by resolution; and
® WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Eagan does
hereby deem it to be in the best interest of the City to assure
application of its subdivision regulations to lands within its
boundaries by exercising its prerogatives under Minnesota
Statutes Section 272.162;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan
hereby elects to have the provisions and restrictions of
Minnesota Statutes Section 272.162 apply to the transfer and
division of real property within its boundaries and does hereby
notify the Dakota County Auditor of said election and does
further direct that certified copy of this Resolution be filed
with the Dakota County Auditor and Recorder.
MOTION BY:
SECONDED BY:
• MEMBERS IN FAVOR:
MEMBERS OPPOSED:
Date:
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF EAGAN
ATTEST: BY:
City Clerk
Mayor
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true
and correct copy of a RESOLUTION adopted by the City Council of
the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, on , 19
/ E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
(o City of Eagan
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nineteen
ADDITIONAL ITEMSi
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
A. Public Improvement Contracts:
I Contract 86-12, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Pumphouse #8) --At
10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 29, formal bids were received to construct
the pumphouse for wells #8 -and 9. Enclosed on page ew is
a tabulation of the bids received along with a comparison to
the Engineer's estimate. All bids will be checked for accuracy
on extensions and additions and a formal recommendation will
be made by the Director of Public Works at the June 3, Council
meeting.
•' ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-12 (Pumphouse # 8) and award the contract to the
recommended lowest responsible bidder.
2. Contract 86-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (-Hampton Heights
Trunk Watermain)--At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, May 29, formal bids
were received for the installation of the trunk water main through
the proposed Hampton Heights subdivision and also to service
wells # 8 and 9 presently under construction. Enclosed on page
is a tabulation of the bids received and a comparison
to I the estimate contained on the feasibility report presented
at the public hearing held on August 6, 1985.
All easements required for the installation of this improvement
are being dedicated with the Hampton Heights final plat.
® All bids will be checked for accuracy in extensions and additions
and a recommendation for formal award will be provided by .the
Director of Public Works at the June 3, Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-15 (Hampton Heights - Trunk Water Main) and award
the contract to the recommended lowest responsible bidder.
e, 7
CONTRACTORS
1. Richmar Construction 5% BB
2, A & K Construction 5% BB
•
FEASIBILITY REPORT EST.
UNDER FEAS. REPORT EST
Pi
DEEP WELL NO. 8 6 9
PUMPING FACILITY ..
CONTRACT NO. 86-12
PROJECT -NO. 457
EAGAN:,. MINNESOTA
a
Our File No. 49377
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: Friday, May 30, 1986
$222,000
-16.3%
TOTAL BASE BID
185,730.00
188,829.00
9
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Our File No. 49363
/S
CITY CONTRACT NO. 86—,K
HAMPTON HEIGHTS
TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 451
EAGAN.,MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.,T.
BID DATE: Friday, May 30., 1986
CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID
Orfei & Sons 5% BB $323,551,.43
Northdale Construction 5% BB 323,660.00
Richard Knutson 5% BL' 330 44Q -1n
Winter Construction 5% Bii 347.974.00
Ceca Utilities 5% 348.571.00
F.F. Jedlicki 5% BB 349,360.00
Lake Area Utility 5% BB 356.962.30
Rice Lake Contracting 5% BB 3AQ.A34L5�
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ $340,000.00
FEASIBILITY REPORT EST'. ------- 332,820.00
% Under Engineer's Est. ------- —4.8%
% Under Feasibility Est. ------ —2.8%
5397d 6 /
i
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
Public Improvment Contracts cont'd.
3. Contract 86-11, Approve Plans/Order Ad :for Bids (Williams/
LaRue and Wyndham Corporate Center Additions) --Contract 86-11
provides for the installation of sanitary sewer and storm sewer
to. service the Williams and LaRue 1st and 2nd Additions at the
intersection of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road. In addition,
this contract provides for the installation of sanitary sewer
and intersection reconstruction necessary to service the proposed
Wyndham Corporate Center Addition in the SW corner of Pilot Knob
Road and 4'94.
® As a result of the public hearings held for each project, the
Council authorized the preparation of the plans and specifications
which have now been completed and are being presented for the
Council's review, approval and authorization to advertise for
solicitation of bids. The majority of the easements necessary
for these improvements have been acquired with one parcel exception
in each project, which is currently in progress and will require
to be obtained prior to contract award.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 86-11 (William/LaRue and Wyndham Corporate Center
Additions) and order the advertisement for a bid opening to be
held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 27, 1986.
4. Contract 86-8, `1986 Seal Coating --As a part of the approved
® 198'6 budget, $61,000 has been allocated from the general fund
budget to be matched by an equal amount from the major street
fund to finance the 1986 Seal Coating Program. Enclosed on page
is a map showing the streets to be seal coated this year wit in
the allocated budget amount. Detailed plans and specifications
have been completed in anticipation of the Council's authorization
to advertise for a bid opening. With July and August the ideal
time to perform the seal coating, this proposed bid opening schedule
is ideal to meet that time frame.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans
for Contract 86-8 and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening
to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 27, 1986.
76
A
OG jod
--cT
0
4
� I
55'f`2
`2
9,
muEr
�552 3
1986'SEALCOAT
7/
AN,
APPLE
City of
Eagan
Q. North
0 112
1
, mile
� I
55'f`2
`2
9,
muEr
�552 3
1986'SEALCOAT
7/
Agenda Information Memo
June 3, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
I
CONTRACT 85-21, MAINTENANCE FACILITY EXPANSION
B. Contract 85-21, Maintenance Facility Expansion - Revised
Concept Design Approval --On February 18, 1986, the Council gave
initial concept design approval for the proposed expansion and
remodeling of the City's Maintenance Facility and authorized
the preparation of detailed plans and specifications and another
cost estimate. As a result of refinement, of detailed plans and
analysis of formal bids received for a similar facility expansion
in Apple Valley, it was apparent that the current budget would
be significantly exceeded.
® Therefore, Boarman Architects has met with staff on several occa-
sions to evaluate potential revisions., modifications and alternate
to try and maintain the current budget allocation. Because of
the construction cost constraints, significant concept design
alterations had to be implemented. Therefore, the architect
and staff would like to represent the modified plan to the Council
for their review, approval and authorization to again prepare
detailed plans with another cost estimate.
•
The Public Works Director and representatives of the architectural
firm will be at the June 3 meeting, to discuss in detail the
status and progress of this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the revised
concept design for Contract 85-21 (Maintenance Facility Expansion)
and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and cost estimates.
7y
Agenda Information
June 3, 1986, City
Page Twenty -Two
Memo
Council Meeting
RECEIVE BID/RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
C. City of Eagan Receive Bids/Award Contracts (Base Radio
Communications Stations and Installations) --The City has requested
bids for two complete base radio stations which include instal-
lation. There were three bidders, please refer to the attached
letter from John DuBois, t e City's Communications Consulting
Engineer found on pages through 75 The low bidder
is General Communications of St. Louis Park in the amount of
$10,369. The major piece of equipment is a master base station
that will be installed in the equipment room within the Eagan
police dispatch center.
ACTION TO BE, CONSIDERED ON' THIS ITEM: To approve the low quotation
submitted by General Communications in the amount of $10,369.
73
•
JOHN R. DuBOIS
Communications Consulting Engineer
Registered Professional
Electrical Engineer
May 9, 1986
Mr. Thomas L. Hedges
• City Administrator
City of Eagan
3630 Pilot Knob Road
P. O. Box 21199
Eagan, MN 55123
Dear Mr. Hedges:
7005 Heatherton Trail
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
Telephone (612) 927-6810
The purpose of this letter is to starmiarize the bidding for the tuu,
top-of-the-line complete base radio stations and installation that
were contained in my April 6, 1985 "Request for Quotations" letter.
Three cost quotations were received as follows:
11b. Bidder Location Compliant Amount
1. Motorola, Inc. MinnetonkaYes $10,563.00
2. General Communications St. Louis Park Yes $10,369.00
3. Dave's Electronic Faribault Yes $13,341.00
The low bid from the General Communications Cotrpany includes three items
that are specially priced from the General Electric Company using GSA
pricing (Item #1 at $4,678, Item #3 at $3,624, and Item #8 at $405 for a
total of $8,707).
Based on all of the above information, I recommend that you award this
procurement to the lea, compliant bidder the General Cmururications Company.
If you accept my recommendation, please issue one Purchase Order to the
General Communications Company in the amount of.$1,661 for Items 2, 4, 5,
6, 7, 9 and 10 and a second Purchase Order, in the amount of $8,707 to the
General Electric Company for Items 1, 3 and 8.
711
John R. DuBois
Page 2
Please call me at 348-4081 if you have any questions about this report.
I am pleased to assist you in this important project.
Yours sincerely,
. LL l r
John R. DuBois Ph.D.
Registered Professional Wmuunications Engineer
Minnesota Registration #7350
•
cc: Police Chief Jay Berthe
Mr. Peter Gildart, Motorola, Inc.
Mr. Dennis_Esterly, General Ccmmmications
Mr. Dave Schmidtke, Dave's Electronics Service
Is
75
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: MAY 30, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
SENECA WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
The Mayor, Director of Public works and City Administrator met
recently with administrative staff from the Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant to discuss methods to control and report odor
originating from their treatment process. It was agreed upon
by all persons present that a committee be established, made
up of residents, that could review changes that are proposed
• for reducing odor at the treatment plant, monitor odor on a reg-
ular basis and provide immediate reports to staff at the treatment
plant. Enclosed on pages through_ is a copy of a
letter that was sent to selected residents in west Eagan, asking
for their consideration to serve on this committee. If the City
Council knows of anyone that would be interested in fulfilling
this type of role, please let this office know who that individual
is and we will contact them by letter or telephone. Also enclosed
is a copy of a poem that Tom Colbert received from the Duluth
Tribune and Herald; it is enclosed on page.
O'NEIL LAW SUIT
The City Administrator and City Attorney met with Mr. and Mrs.
Robert O'Neil, John Klein and their legal counsel, Harold Sheff,
on Monday, May 19, to further discuss a letter of agreement between
the City and the O'Neils that would allow the City to proceed
• with its review and update of the Comprehensive Guide Plan and
in turn, the O'Neil's would not proceed with any depositions,
discovery or other aspects of the law suit. Mr. and Mrs. O'Neil
wanted some assurance that the Comprehensive Guide Plan would
be reviewed and expedited by the City and therefore requested
a schedule for the review and update. A schedule for the
Comprehensive Guide update was prepared by the Planning Department,
reviewed by the City Attorney and City Administrator and submitted
as a proposed schedule to Mr. and Mrs. O'Neil. For a copy of
the schedule, refer to pages_� through �. There .has
been no confirmation made by the O'Neils, at the time of this
dictation, as to whether they are in agreement with the letter.
STAN WESTENBERG LETTER
Enclosed on page iJ is a copy of a note that was sent by Mr.
and Mrs. Stan Westenberg who reside at 2083 Garnet Lane, thanking
the City Council for recent action on the application made by
On -Belay. Mr, and Mrs. Westenberg are members of Peace Reform
Church.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS REPORT/APRIL
Enclosed on pages 0 through Y'(� is a copy of the April
monthly inspections report. Please note that the City has issued
300 single family building permits through the month of April.
MASAC UPDATE
Enclosed is a copy of the most recent agenda and minutes for
MASAC meetings. Tom Baker and Jon Hohenstein are both represent-
ing the City on a regular basis at these meetings. (page(s)f7- 95z ).
VEHICLES FOR SALE
At the last City Council meeting a question was raised about
police enforcement of vehicles "For Sale" placed throughout the
city. Please refer to pageCJl7 for an update and regulatory
considerations relating to t rm
6 City's enforcement of vehicles
"For Sale" throughout the city.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
77
of
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O.. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
May 21, 1986
Tom Hedges, Eagan City Administrator
3830 Pilot Knob Road
P.O. Box 2119
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear neighbor:
mETROPOumn
WRITE
COnTROL
EOmmiffion
Tom, e� aMQ
For the past several summers, odors originating from the Seneca
Waste Water Treatment Plant located in the Minnesota River Valley
have occassionally drifted into the community.
To control this problem, a number of process changes have been made
at the plant and .odor control systems have been added similar to
those which have been successfully used at the Duluth Treatment
Plant.
Plans have begun for a plant expansion here in Eagan, and odor
control is an integral part of that planning. While odors are
naturally common to waste water treatment, we want to insure that
present and potential future odors are minimized.
In an effort to work with the community on the current status and
proposed expansion, the management of the Seneca plant is working
with the City of Eagan on the formation of an Eagan Air Quality Task
Force. You have been selected as a neighboring resident who may have
an interest in serving on this committee to work with the Seneca
staff in discussing concerns, monitoring problems and recommending,
potential solutions. The Committee will meet once a month for
approximately one and a half hours.
An informational meeting has been
June 12, 1986 at the City Hall.
situation at the Seneca plant, the
the plans for plant expansion. We
tour of the Eagan facilities.
M
set for 4:30 p.m. on Thursday,
We will discuss the current
current odor control program, and
will also make plans for a future
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Neighbor
Page 2
May 21, 1986
Ii ;you are not interested or are unable to participate on this Task
Force Committee, we would appreciate it if you could recommend an
interested and concerned citizen for consideration. Please contact
the City Administrator's Office as soon as possible in light of the
upcoming meeting.
We look forward to seeing you and discussing concerns which are
mutual to us all.
Sincerely, .-
Bea lomqui
Mayor, City of Eagan
BB/CJ/hb
79
��-
ames Wawra
Seneca Plant Manager
n
U
Friday, April 5, 1985
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District wastewater
tment plant.
Osgood broadcasts on the air
a poem on what's in the air
BY DARREN CARROLL
Staff writer
The wastewater treatment plant in Duluth was lifted from the
edge of Lake Superior into
the annals of literature Thursday.
Well — almost. Charles Osgood. news-
caster and commentator with CES, picked
a story that ran in Thursday's News
'�'v.,
rT
Tribune &Herald, waxed poetic, and came
Tr-
Lip with a few verses about Duluth and the
"s
Western Lake Superior Sanitary District.
Osgood's story was broadcast nationally
.fes •�%�'
Thursday on his CES radio program. "The
;j
Osgood File."
�.,
The sanitary district has been working
_pY;
c
with masking agents since last fall in a b!d
Y
to lessen the pungentodors emitted from is
plant at 27th Avenue West and the water-
t( �front.
�
Lf
thThe ageagentstested thus far have stens
at run the gamut from bubble gum to
Charles Osgood
pine, and from there Osgood's poem goes:
y
"There is something in the springtime air,
That is somehow beyond compare.
The air in Wcst Duluth is fine.
This week, it smells a lot like pine.
A week or t wo ago, say some
It smelled a lot like bubble gum.
Front week to week it's hard to tell
Ex --cll v how Duluth will smell.
It all depends howsomeone there
Decides ,how he'll perfume the air.
They ha ve good cause, to tell the truth,
76 scent the air there in Duluth.
We'll speak of what the r:7 has in ft
When we return in ju_:t a minute.
Duluth is delightful town ,
I'd never ever put it down.
In no way is Duluth inferior,
Like its great lake, it is superior.
A super place with much togive there
To all the super folks w•ho live there.
But, an observation one could make
About the air dow-rrby the lake;
We'd like to say the treatment plant
Smells like a daisy — but we can't.
When breezes blow ir, from the lake
A certain free, same people mike.
It could smell1wtter. yes, it could
Andhow it doesn't smell isgood.
So the sanitary district there
Decided to perfume the air
To mask the pungent ea u de — please don't ask.
They're trying several different scents
As a form of self-defense
To make Duluth., which is so Pretty.
A somewhat sweeter -smelling city.
To bubble guru, some arc a verse
But there are scenes a whole lot worse.
Some like cedar, some like p.;,^e,
Some think that cinnamon is five.
But that casts fifty grand per drum
So they may stick. to bubble guru.
Or maybe, in lteirciticduty,
They'll choose bay rum, or tuttl frutd."
District Executive Director Seth Holloway, who was phoned by
NEC and RKO Radio Network about the story, said he felt a little
uneasy about the district's national attention.
"I'm not sure that I like all of the notoriety," he said. "Hopefully,
it's to the good of the district."
The district is trying to improve on problems of the c_, t, and
Holloway hopes Duluthians will keep that in mind. Despite the hu-
morous tone of Osgood's ditty, Holloway would like residents to
know that he takes the odor problem seriously.
"If it was taken positively by the citizens of Duluth, then : guess
It's OK." he said.
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE', (612) 454-8100
May 28, 1986
MR & MRS ROBERT O'NEIL .
2040 EDGCUMBE RD
ST PAUL MN 55116
Re: Schedule for Comprehensive Plan Update
Dear Robert & Grace O'Neil:
BEA BLOMQUIST
Mo
THOMAS EGAN
.LAMES A. SMITH
MC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Memwrs
THOMAS HEDGES .
City Atlminislralor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
City Clerk
Our City Planner, Dale Runkle, has met with John Voss, the City's
consulting planner, and it is their opinion that the following
schedule is feasible for the review and updating of commercial
land use within the Comprehensive Guide Plan. The following is
the proposed schedule:
June 2 - 6 Set meeting with individual property owners
to review proposed changes in Comprehensive
Guide Plan
June 11 - 18 Hold meetings with property owners
June 26 Joint meeting/Advisory Planning Commission
and City Council to review Comprehensive
Guide Plan map
June 27 -July 15 Complete any changes to Comprehensive Guide
Plan map
July 22 Public Hearing to be held by Advisory Plan-
ning Commission on any and all proposed
changes
August 5 - 19 City Council review and authorize changes to
be submitted to the Metropolitan Council
Immediately following either the August 5 or 19 City Council
meeting, any changes to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be
submitted to the Met Council for their review.
8/
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
•
LETTER TO MR & MRS ROBERT O'NEIL
MAY 28, 1986
PAGE TWO
If you have any questions regarding the proposed Comprehensive
Guide Plan update, please feel free to contact Mr. Dale Runkle or
me at any time.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Harold Sheff
John Klein
• Chris Dietzen
Paul Hauge
Dale Runkle
TLH/kf
•
LZ
�6�eSS
VL q4 Dace
&IZULC�A is - G✓�
Ole
/141
41A 00(
E
9 • 1' -
.PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AP.RIL 1986
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
Building
163
463
Electrical
Plumbing
174
160
[;1 Z;
409
HVAC
143
441
Water Softener
Signs
12
11
106
34
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0
0
will
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
.1f'ii �� w�7
LOMA
TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES
3
FOUNDATION
1
----
$ 15.00
$ ------
$ 15.0
300
SINGLE FAMILY
100
$ 8,052,40C
37,,274.00
18,636.50'
218,097.2
14
DUPLEX
6
392,OOC
1,974.00
987.00
12,664.0
59
TOWNHOUSE
19
1,776,00 C
7,597.00
3,798.50
59,056.5
6
CONDO
1
527,OOC
1,500.50
750.25
18,870.2
0
APT BLDGS
0
AGRICULTURAL.
6
COMMERCIAL
2
3,787,000
9,833.50
4,.916.75
85,429.2.
16
COMM/IND REMODEL
3
108,70C
585.00
292.70
932.71
01
COMM/IND ADDITION
0
INDUSTRIAL
0
INSTITUTIONAL
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
2
6,022,000
15,421.00
7,710.50
73,106.5(
5
RES. GARAGES
3
25,500
217.50
64.25
294.7'
9
RES. ADDITIONS
5
84,500
513.50
216.50
764.5(
0
SWIM POOL
43
MISCELLANEOUS
21
70,350
829.50
---
869:.0(
0
DEMOLISH
0
HOUSE MOVES
463
TOTALS
163
20,845,450
75,760.50
37,372.95
470,099.7(
YEAR-TO-DATE 45,983,25
184,400.50
90,466.20
1,169,653.9:
LOMA
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT
DATE APRIL 1986
TYPE
/ OF
PERMITS
/ OF
BUILDINGS
# OF
UNITS
VALUATION
PERMIT FEES
SURCHARGE
PLAN REVIEW
FEES
TOTAL FEES
3-PLEX
ADDRESS 8 LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATION
FEE
SURCHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUP.
4-PLEX
12
3
12
$ 732,000
$ 3,792.,00
$ 366.00
$ 1.,896.00
25 068.00
6-PLEX
6
1
!6
428,000
2,082.00
214.00
1,041.00
12,844.00
7-PLEX
1480 DEERWOOD DR
IND SCH DIS
8-PLEX
L 1, B 1, DEERWOOD S
H 196
75,500,000
13,933.00
1,525.00
6,966.50
13.933.00
11859
12 PLEX
2
2
4
2
1,143,000
3,223.50
571.50
1,611.75
40,014.75
DUPLEX
6
3
6
392,000
1,974.00
196.001
987.00 1
12,664.00
TOTALS
26
9
26
2,695,000
11,071.50
11347.50
5,535.75
-90,590.75
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN
BLDG
PERMIT
STATE
PLAN REV
PERMIT f
ADDRESS 8 LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATION
FEE
SURCHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUP.
11874
4200 PILOT KNOB RDEASTER
LUTH
PUBLIC
L 011, B 25, SECT 27
$ 522,000
$ 1,488.00
$ 261.00
$ 744.00
$8,688.0
ACILI'
1480 DEERWOOD DR
IND SCH DIS
11732
L 1, B 1, DEERWOOD S
H 196
75,500,000
13,933.00
1,525.00
6,966.50
13.933.00
11859
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
EAGAN WOODS
82,200
382.00
41.50
191.00
614.5
COMM
L 1, B 1, EAGAN WOOD
LAND LTD PT
11758
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
„
13,000
98.50
6.50
49.25
154.2
COMM
L 1 B 1 EAGAN WOOD
11802
1380 CORP CTR CURVE
L.2 B 2, EAG OFC.2
NW MUT'L LIFE
-13,500
104.50
7.00
52.45
163.9
COMM
11820
1200 TRAPP RDB
NW MUT'L LIFE
1,750,000
4,558.00
875.00
2,279.00
37,374.0
COMM
2020 SILVER BELL RD
11731
L 1 B 1 DALLAS DEV
DALLAS DEVE
2,037,000
5,275.50
915.00
2.,637.75
48,055.2
COMM
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - AP985
OFFICE HOURS - INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH TEAR -TO -DATE
Building 308 1,018
Plumbing
123.5
529.5
HVAC
91
189
. Signs
136
281
Adminlatrative/Office
43
207
Fire Marshal
49
154
Miscellaneous
81.7
312 .7
General Office
298.1
756.1
Permit Processing
228.2
936.2
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED
THIS MONTH
TEAR -TO -DATE
Building
151 -
332
Electrical
102
338
Plumbing
94
302
HVAC
103
292
Nater Softener
14
47
Signs
INDUSTRIAL
31
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0
0
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
f
• TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee,
SAC A YAC charges, water meter, road unit fee, parks
dedication A water treatment plant fee.
TYPE
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE
I PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL FEE
160
SINGLE FAMILY
73
$ 5,612,000
$ 26,274
1$ 13,134.00
$150,314.00
34
2 -FAMILY
20
986,000
5,591
2,795.50
78,879.50
90
MULTI -FAMILY
38
2,193,000
11,576.00
5,788.00
75 460.50
1
AGRICULTURAL
1
25,800
175.00
87.50
1,116.50
13
COMMERCIAL
-2
750,000
2.241.001
1,120.50
10,425.50
I
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
INSTITUTIONAL
I
1
PUBLIC FACILITIES
err-ro
3
RES- GARAGES
3
13,600
151.50
—
159.00
3
SWIM POOL
3
28,000
229.50
—
243.50
26
MISCELLANEOUS
11
25,850
751.00
-
366.00
332
TOTAL
151
S 9,634,250
S 46,589.00
$ 22,925.50
$276,964,50
YEAR-TO-DATE
1 3321$23,027.243
1$107.255.001$
52,900.00
$625,619.00
• TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee,
SAC A YAC charges, water meter, road unit fee, parks
dedication A water treatment plant fee.
O H CO 1 tOt C�C O CPC LO
y f, 0H CHCHC
m m m m
9 W
I�III
0
0
o
it
m
P
O
H w
z
I
err-ro
'-ovoP
a
o--
00
v
OmmOmPA
0
o
nm
Ou
q
yl/.
i
Sm>n�oar
n
H
> m
2
a
A
m
n 1
ons
c
maw
a
O A
T
i
F
N
O
O
0
O
x
r
A
-mi
Om
I
N
N
a
0
o
o
c
a
H
P
S
pO
O
S
z
O
q
u•
o
mA
m 3
N
m
W
m N
H
0
O
O
0
0
0
N
n w
O
O
A 1
O
m
S
S
o
N
N
q
m
u
m
O
mn
N S
0
O
O
0
O
�
O
-
H
O
a
P
IJ
r
O
8
m
n
o
n
O H CO 1 tOt C�C O CPC LO
y f, 0H CHCHC
m m m m
!P
018 18 18 IS
I�III
!P
018 18 18 IS
E IE
MAY 27, 1986
7,:30 PM
6040 28th Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1. Call to Order, Roll Call
2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on April 22, 1986
3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications
4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization
Report and Complaint Summary Report.
5. Part 150 - Land Use Considerations - HNTB
6. Persons Wishing to Address the Council.
7.Executive Committee Meeting Report
A. Selection of MASAC Representative to Noise Budget k-brking
Group
B. Inver Grove Heights Application for Membership
8. Resolution for Darrell Weslander
9. Report of MAC Noise Program
10. Other Items Not on Agenda
11. Adjournment
NEXT MEETING DATE: June 24, 1986
97.
•
40
April 22, 1986
7:30 P.M.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
1. Call to Order,, Roll Call.
The meeting was called to order by Robert Johnson at 7:30 p.m. and
the secretary was asked to call the roll. The following members
were in attendance.
Ben Griggs(R)
Northwest Airlines
Bob Johnson(R)
Republic Airlines
Richard Dinning(A)
USAir Airlines
David Woodrow(R)
St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
Ron Glaub(R)
MBAA
Jerry Norton(R)
Mpls. Chamber of Commerce
James McLaughlin(A)
Airline Pilots Association
Jeff Hamiel(R)
Metropolitan Airports Came
Roylene Champeaux(R)
City of Minneapolis
John Richter(R)
City of Minneapolis
Steve Cramer(A)
City of Minneapolis
Scott Bunin(R)
City of St. Paul
Lloyd Wickstrom(R)
City of St. Paul
Don Priebe(R)
City of Richfield
Mark Mahon(R)
City of Bloomington
Robert Mood(R)
City of Bloomington
Bernard Friel(R)
City of Mendota Heights
Tom Baker(R)
City of Eagan
Michael Brucciani(R)
City of Burnsville
Juan Rivas(A)
City of Burnsville
Paul Cain(R),
City of St. Louis Park
Robert Pollock(R-Associate)
City of Inver Grove Hts
Doug Casserly.(R)
Airborne Express
Advisors
Commissioner Jan Del Calzo Metropolitan Airports Comic
Bob Botcher FAA
Frank Benson FAA
Dick White Air Transport Association
Nigel Finney Q� Metropolitan Airports Comm
Darrell Weslander U Technical Advisor
Jan Conner Secretary
Guests
Gordon Wagnor
Dave Kelso
Tom Lund
Jon Hohenstein
Mr. & Mrs. Harley Kielson
Lenore Brill
J. K. Nelson
David Duddleston
Mr. & Mrs. Don Witz
Jean Melin
Marty Silvi
City of Minneapolis
SMAAC
City
of
Eagan
City
of
Richfield
City
of
St. Louis Park
City
of
Bloomington
Republic Airlines
City
of
Richfield
City
of
Inver Grover Heights
City
of
Inver Grove Heights
2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on March 25, 1986.
The minutes were approved with one correction. Under letter H. .
where each item was voted on separately, item 1B has a•correction
in the count -the minutes will be changed to show 12 Yes and 8 No with
1 vote abstained.
3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications.
USAir Airlines' new alternate representative, Richard Dinning,
was introduced to the MASAC members. MASAC also received written
communication from the City of Eagan officially appointing Mr. W.
Dustin Mirick as Eagan's alternate member of MASAC. Written
statements were received from attorneys representing DHL, Airborne
Express and the Air Cargo Association regarding access to the
airport at night.
4. 'i-chnical Advisor's Preferential
The reports for the month of March were presented by Darrell
Weslander and were approved as presented.
Darrell also spoke on repeat callers. During December 1985, January
1986 and February 1986 the 20 most frequent callers represented
between 40% and 60% of the total noise couplaints. Don Priebe asked
him to point out areas where the frequent callers are located
suggesting only approximately 20 people are making many calls in the
South Minneapolis area. It was suggested that we try calculating the
number of calls each of these repeat callers make during a month.
Darrell Weslander was also asked to provide another report showing
runway use percentages excluding nighttime hours.
5. Persons Wishing to Address Council.
Martin Silva of Inver Grove Heights expressed his concern that
the City of Inver Grover Heights be considered for membershipinto
MASAC. The matter will be referred to the executive committee.
-3-
6. Vote to Amend By-Laws:Expanded Membership.
A discussion took place concerning the Executive Co Taittee Meeting of
February 4, 1986 at which time the By -Laws changes were drafted for
the addition of new members into MASAC.
Mark Mahon moved and Scott Bunin seconded to have Burnsville and
Airborne Express accepted as new MASAC members. The motion was
passed.
7. Airport Noise Implementation Working Group -Report on
Bob Johnson read the schedule for action on Long and Short Tenn
Noise Abatement Measures:
April 22 - MASAC review and comment
April 23 - MAC Operations and Environment Committee meeting to review
both drafts
• April 24 - MAC meets to act on the reports
April 30 - Governor receives MAC noise abatement program
It was pointed out that many of the recommended measures in these
drafts are very similar or identical to those in MASAC's recommended
Part 150 Program. Only four MASAC measures found no parallel in the
draft reports: #3 - differential noise fee; #6 - assignment of
propeller aircraft to Runways 11L -29R when the preferential runway
system is in use; #10 - tighten procedures relating to the "Eagan
Corridor"; and #12 - enforce and optimize the nighttime run-up
policy.
Ton Baker moved and Bernie Friel seconded that MASAC recommend to
the Working Group to have them reconsider the above 4 items left out
of the Working Group's Long and Short term drafts. The motion was
passed.
• 8. Summer Construction Program at MSP -Nigel Finney.
Nigel Finney briefly explained the various construction projects
that will be taking place at the Mpls. Airport over the next year.
9. Other Items Not on Agenda.
Jeff Hamiel explained the MAC is currently trying to purchase an
instrument landing system on runway 11L(the only runway at MSP that
doesn't have an IIS.) The FAA currently states there is an
approximate waiting period of 2 years on this equipment. The MAC is
still negotiating.
John Richter spoke briefly on the MAC Meeting of April 21, 1986.
It was noted that there was informational material available
from Roy Madgwick concerning the Islip Airport Noise Abatement
actions.
Michael Brucciani moved and Jeff Hamiel seconded to endorse
Northwest and Republic Airlines merger as a sound abatement
-4 -
measure. Bernie Friel motioned to table the motion with Mark Mahon
as the second. Notion was tabled.
10. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
9/
1985
Wold Chamberlain Field
Run -UP.
DIiscellane ou s
1986
Wold-ChamberraTn Field
Run -ups
Miscellaneous
Total
394
2
75
4.71
804
6
33_
843
Miscellaneous complaints In-
cludes helicopters and secon-
dary airports.
Crystal
Flying Cloud
St. Paul
Apple Valley
Bloomington
Burnsville
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Edina
IGH
Lauderdale
Lakeville
Mendota Hgts.
Mpls.
Richfield
Roseville
Savage
St. Louis Park
St. Paul
S: St. Paul
3
2
28
33
ie,
1
3
6
1
1
2
1
7
266
9
4
2
302
IDG r
6 `
19
26
45
2
6
1
22
337
26
1
1
MINNEAPOLIS
61bbllo YA
32 14% ,1%
308
20
18`] O
RICHFIELD/
BLOOMINGTON
r l I Mf
1
502 HOURLY PERCENTAGE USE OF RUNWAYS
MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
APRIL 1986
ST. PAUL/HIGHLAND PARK
ftIutYelr.
EMIL
63a 94
t
`IIrR1A
MENDOTA HEIGHTS/
EAGAN
OPERATIONS SUMMARY -
1985
/ 1986
Itinerant:
Air Carrier
766
654
Commuter
120
88
General Aviation
167
199
Military
16
29
Loca I :
Civil 37 40
Military 0 0
Total Average Dally Op06 1010
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE (AC)756/732
122/177 of these are 3rd level carriers
utilizing prop aircraft.
MONTH OF APRIL 1986
MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT RECORD
Nighttime
Number of Excessive Structural Activity Restricted Ground Low Secondary
Date Complaints Noise Disturbance Interruption Hours Run -ups Noise Flying Airports Miscellaneous
1
25
19
-
1
-
- -
3
2
-
2
33
22
-
5
3
- 1
2
-
-
3'
22
16
1
4
1
- -
-
-
-
4
40
27
-
6
3
- -
3
1
-
5
"29
19
-
3
1
- 1
4
-
1
6
41
32
1
3
-
- -
5
-
1
7
22
14
1
-
-
- 1
3
1
1
8
26
17
1
3
1
- -.
3
1
-
9
18
12
-
1
-
- -
2
2
1
10
32
26
-
3
-
- -
2
1
-
11
20
18
-
-
-
- -
1
1
-
-,Z12
0113
21
23
11
19
1
-.
4
2
-
-
- 1
- -
1
1
2
1
1
-
14
24,
18
-
-
-
-- 2
3
1
-
15
25
22
-
-
-
- -
1
2
-
16
17
11
-
-
1
1 1
1
2
1
17
23
15
-
3
-
1 1
2'
-
1
18
37
30
-
2
-
2 -
2
1
-
19
18
13
-
-
-
- 2
2
1
-
20
18
12
-
1
-
- 1
4
-
-
21
22
14
2
3
-
- -
1
1
-
' 22
16
.7
-
2
- _
2 -
3
1
1
23
32
26
-
2
1
- 1
1'
1
1'
24
19
14
1
2
-
- 1
-
-
-
25i
47
36
-
3
2
- 1
4
1
1-
26
34
20
1
4
-
- 2
4
3
-
27
60
42
1
6
-
- 1
10
-
-
28
33
26
1
1
-
- 1
4
-
-
29
33
27
-
3
-
- -
2
1
-
30
33
24
-
6
-
- 1
2.
-
-
843
609
11
73
13
6 19
76
27
9
APRIL 1986
NOISE COMPLAINTS
RN
Category and Time of Day
During April the following complaints were recorded:
Category
Number
Percentage
238
1200-1559
Excessive Noise
609
72.2%
Structural Disturbance
11
1.3%
Activity Interruption
73
8.7%
Nighttime Restricted Hours
13
1.5%
Run -ups
6
.7%.
Ground Noise
19
2.3%
Low Flying
76
9.0%
Secondary Airports
27
3.2%.
Miscellaneous
9
1.0%
843
100.0%
u_ss=
2400-0559
31
0600-1159
238
1200-1559
144
1600-1959
228
2000-2359
155
CAP
47
843
9�
Lit, . it)
.•
3630 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
23 May 1986
TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: VEHICLES "FOR SALE" WITHIN THE CITY
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
CM.I., P.I.
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
Abnlnlnmlw bouln
KENNETH G. AB2MANN
I would like this information to be shared with the mayor and
city council members.
I have asked Operations Captain Aszmann to instruct our patrol
division to once again be aware of vehicles which are for sale on
public property or on private property if the vehicle for sale
does not belong to the property owner.
Current city code, section 9.15 reads -as follows:
"Parking for the Purpose of Advertising or Selling Merchandise It
is unlawful for any person to park a vehicle on any street for
the purpose of advertising such vehicle for sale, for the
purpose of advertising for sale or selling merchandise thereon
or therein, or advertising any merchandise for sale or a forth-
coming event."
Under this section of the city code.,. we can control the sale of
vehicles on streets, highway right-of-way and private property
where the seller of the vehicle is different than the owner of
the property.
We are restricted from stopping people from having vehicles for
sale on their own property as long as the vehicle is currently
licensed (to them) and is driveable.
Captain Aszmann has informed me
wor,Cingg on this problem throughout
Jd Berthe
V�
JMB/vk
that the officers are already
the city.
9.5
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OFSTRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY