No preview available
 /
     
06/17/1986 - City Council RegularADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN., MINNESOTA JUNE 17, 1986 C�1i�:V4tiZ�] i�i�►7 Item 1. O'Neil Vs City of Eagan CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Sncrease in Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit 2Za MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 16, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY Item 1. O'Neil vs. City of Eagan --City Attorney Hauge is planning to provide an update on the current status of the O'Neil vs. City of Eagan lawsuit. To date, Mr. O'Neil has not signed the letter of understanding between the City of Eagan and Mr. O'Neil that both parties will not proceed with depositions, discovery or any other findings related to the lawsuit until the Comprehensive Guide Plan update is completed. Enclosed on pages ZZy through is a copy of a resolution that the City Attorney would like to discuss with the City Council after the meeting on Tuesday., CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Increase in Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds --The City held public hearings and granted a multifamily housing revenue bond issued in the amount of $10,000,000.00 for the Thomas Lake Apartment Project. The devel- oper, Dominium Group, is requesting that the Inducement Resolution be changed to allow the amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds to increase from $10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00. Reasons for changing the amount of the Inducement Resolution are outlined in a letter from the Doninium Group and bond counsel, Holmes and Graven, found on pages laa through ZZ Any change in the resolution would require a public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a public hearing to be scheduled at the July 1 City Council meeting for the purpose of considering a change in the Inducement Resolution for the Thomas Lake Apartment that would increase the amount of bonds from 10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00. Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit --Enclosed is a memorandum from City Planner Runkle to the City Administrator regarding the Wachovia Indirect Source Permit. The City Administrator and City Planner would like to briefly review this permit with the City Council. p. ZZ 4 Z30, /s/Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 27-1 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN 1986 5-9-86 Draft Only WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council in early 1985 directed the City staff and consulting planner to commence the planning process in order to review the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan last prepared in 1980; and WHEREAS, the study was commenced in early 1985 by the staff consulting planner for a complete review of the Lana Use Guide, including residential, commercial and industrially designated areas; and WHEREAS, the statutory basis for the lana use planning within a statutory city is found in Minnesota Statutes Annotated 462.355 including provisions for adoption and amendment to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; and WHEREAS, an application was submitted to the City of Eagan by Robert O'Neil and Grace O'Neil for the rezoning from A -Agricultural, to PD-Plannea Development, for approximately 100 acres located in the south half of Section 10, north of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lexington Avenue and east of I -35E, which was first considered at a public hearing of the Advisory Planning Commission on May 28, 1985; and WHEREAS, John Voss, the Eagan Consulting Planner, aid in a memorandum to the City dated , 1985 suggest that the existing commercial - type zoning within the City may be adequate for future development at the current rate of commercial development within the City and as compared with the amount of zoning and development in other metropolitan area suburban municipalities; and v7� J WHEREAS, at the time of the application submittea by Robert O'Neil the zoning of the property was Agricultural and R-4, Multiple Residential, and the lana use designation provided for an R -III density allowing for six to twelve residential unite per acre; and WHEREAS, an action was brought by the O'Neils against the City on or about October 10, 1985 for specific relief, including a request that the City Council approve the rezoning of the property as requested; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission submitted a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application and the Eagan City Council acted upon the application at its regular meeting on July 16, 1986; and WHEREAS, in September of 1985 the City Council scheduled a special ,joint meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council which first met on October 7, 1985 to commence the Comprehensive Guide update process and subsequently met as a ,joint committee on November 26, 1985, December 12, 1985, January 23, 1986 and March 11, 1986; and WHEREAS, prior to the action by the City Council on the application submitted by the O'Neils, the City Council indicated that it has initiated proceedings before the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council to review the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan last adopted in 1980 and the City has since that time continued to review the plan in detail; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the Comprehensive Guide review process including residential, commercial and industrial uses and proposed to the O'Neils that the action mentioned above be held in abeyance to allow the City to proceed with the Comp Guide review; and WHEREAS, the City Council at its regular meeting on March 19, 1986 adopted a resolution directing the staff and the Advisory - Planning Commission together with the Council to proceed with the Guide review process covering all ��3 applicable parcels and uses of land throughout the City subject, however, to the entry into a stipulation between Robert and Grace O'Neil and the City of Eagan providing for a 180 -day stay of the ,O'Neil civil action within which time the City will proceed with its.Comp Guide planning process including review and action of all commercial comprehensive guide planning within the City; and WHEREAS, there are numerous other parcels of property within the City that are designated commercial use in the Land Use Plan or proposed to be designated commercial use and it is necessary and expedient that the City proceed with the Comprehensive Guide process including the commercial portion of the Guide; and WHEREAS, the City Council has attempted in good faith with unanimous action at its March 19, 1986 meeting to proceed to resolve the action commenced by the O'Neils including the submission of the proposed stipulation based upon discussions with the attorney and representative of the O'Neils together with representatives of the City; and WHEREAS, although the O'Neils have not been willing to enter into a Stipulation for the Stay of Proceedings during the Comp Guide review process, the City Council has directed.the City representatives to meet and attempt to negotiate a stay of the proceedings in order to allow the Comprehensive Guide review to continue for the reasons that are described above; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by seconded by , it was Resolved as follows: - 1. That the Eagan City Council hereby directs the staff and the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission, including the Council, to proceed with the Comprehensive Guide review process covering all applicable parcels and uses of land throughout the City, and further directs the planning consultant and Zz�( planning staff to provide appropriate studies and reports concerning the Comprehensive Plan. for review and ultimate action by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. Dated: Those in favor: Thoseagainst: ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By: By. E.J.an ver a e, .ler Beatta Blomquist, Mayor zz� 1 rruup incorporated 3140 HARBOR LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 6121559-1711 June 12, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: REQUEST TO REVISE INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR THOMAS LAKE APARTMENTS Dear Mr. Hedges: We respectfully request that we be allowed to advertise this week for a public hearing on July 1, 1986 to increase the previously approved Inducement Resolution on the above referenced project from $10,000,000.00 to $11,875,000.00. It is of critical importance that the public hearing be held at the regularly scheduled July 1, 1986 City Council meeting in order to accomplish a July 31, 1986 project closing date as required in our financing commitment. If the public hearing is held on July 1, 1986, we have to publish a notice prior to June 15, 1986. We are requesting that the Inducement Resolution be increased for several reasons. First and most importantly, we have been severely restricted in our ability to secure the types and sources of financing commitments that we had earlier contemplated using, because of the proposed changes being made by the Senate and Congress to our current tax laws. The financing commitment that we were able to secure requires that we incorporate within the project longer periods of capitalized interest thus increasing the total cost of the development. In addition, we have made significant improvements to the project in terms of amenities that will be provided to our residents directly and indirectly. We have spent considerable time in exploring ways to preserve larger areas of natural vegetation by utilizing greater amounts of retaining walls than we had initially proposed. The community facility has been greatly upgraded in terms of recreational amenities and size. Lastly, we have made significant improvements to the unit interiors by providing such extra amenities as European cabinets, microwaves, wood trim and paneled doors to mention a few items. 77-6 i June 12, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges Page Two Your cooperation in accommodating our request would be greatly appreciated. Barbara Portwood, our bond counsel at Holmes and Graven, has indicated that she will send you a procedural and time schedule that will outline those items that have to be completed in order to accommodate a July 31, 1986 closing date on this development. Please give me a call to discuss this issue further. Sincerely, AEB/sl E 0 zz7 BARBARA L. PORTWOOD Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9213 June 13, 1986 HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 737-9700 Mr. Thomas Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: $10,000,000 City of Eagan Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Thomas Lake Apartments Project) Series 1986 Dear Mr. Hedges: Jack Safar, the developer of the above -referenced project has indicated to me that he is negotiating with a tax-exempt bond fund for the sale of the above -referenced bonds. Yesterday I spoke with the attorney for the fund who tells me that the bonds must be closed by July 31st in order to be purchased by the fund. A financing program for this project was approved by the City of Eagan and reviewed by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA") last year. However, because the developer proposes to increase the size of the issue to $11,875,000, the program must be amended following a public hearing for which notice must be published 15 days in advance. Following the public hearing the program must be submitted to MHFA and not rejected for 30 days. In order to meet these procedural requirements and close by July 31, 1986, notice would have to be published on Friday, June 13th or Saturday, June 14th and a public hearing would have to be held by the Eagan City Council on July 1st. The purpose for this letter is to request that a public hearing be scheduled for July 1 and to request your permission to cause notice of the public hearing (in the attached form) to be published. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, Barbara L. Portwood BLP:ds cc: Jack Safar Armand Brachman Z2g' MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: JUNE 13, 1986 SUBJECT: WACHOVIA INDIRECT SOURCE PERMIT The purpose of .this memorandum is to convey activities surrounding the Wachovia Indirect Source Permit (ISP). This memorandum. will describe the purpose of an ISP and when a permit will be issued to Wachovia. Material contained herein is for your information, and I will continue to keep you informed as the ISP approval process proceeds. Project Description. In early 1986, Wachovia Bank and Trust Company of North Carolina purchased 267 acres of the Laukka-Beck planned development. The Wachovia site is located in the south and west one half of the Laukka-Beck planned development and situated south of Northwest Orient's Corporate Headquarters. It is anticipated that the Wachovia site will result in 3,376,510 square feet of mixed use commercial development with construction to commence in 1987 and conclude no later than the year 2020. Indirect Source Permit. An ISP is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) when a concentration of air polluting sources are attracted to a specific development site, and as a consequence will produce a significant increase in air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide and (CO emissions). The principal source of air pollutants in the case of Wachovia are automobiles, retail and commercial facilities, parking facilities and adjacent roadways. Based on air quality projections prepared by BRW Engineering, the Wachovia site will not exceed 8 -hr. average state standards for CO, though a permit is required by MPCA because the site will have more than 1,000 parking stalls. At present, the Wachovia ISP authorizes the construction of 2,296,510 square feet of mixed use commercial development through the year 2005 and specifically permits 11,732 parking spaces. A second Wachovia ISP will be required in the future to construct the remaining 1,080,000 square feet of mixed use commercial development which is planned to commence in the year 2005. ZZ� Memo to City Administrator Hedges June 13, 1986 Page 2 Current Activities. The Planning Department met with Suzanne Pelly of the MPCA in late April, 1986, for the purpose of reviewing an initial draft of the Wachovia ISP. Staff has continued to participate in negotiations with MPCA and Wachovia representatives for purposes of communicating the City's interests. The 30 day comment will begin in the near future and upon its conclusion an ISP will be issued to Wachovia by MPCA. Once this permit has been issued, Wachovia may begin construction activity. The Planning Department will continue to follow activities surround- ing the Wachovia ISP approval process and inform you when the permit has been issued by MPCA. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. D2 \ City Planner DR/SS/hb 7 36 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JUNE 17, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF=ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35'- ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department �,5 B. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA A. Contractor Licenses 1z B. Personnel Items C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition ISD. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) E. 1986 Amusement Device Renewals �$ F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals .� o.IG. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals :Z1H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility o( -I. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Deerwood School Addition) �•_-�-J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (,Highview Avenue - Streets) ZL K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition) ::n L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition) D.20 M. Approve Final Plat, T.E.M. Addition ,i e.%DN. Approve Final Plat, Hampton Heights Addition t. V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (�•3 1A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City P.33 B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets & Utilities) P,s�{C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458, (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1, 1986, City Council Meeting 1 1 D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project ,471, (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1,, 1986, Meeting �j E. Public Hearing for Project 444R, (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm QSewer Outlet) VI. OLD BUSINESS 'A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development District X11 �? Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) Continued from May 21, 1986, City Council Meeting Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - Cul de Sac Reconsideration �p�D.. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign VII. NEW BUSINESS 0-'A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) for a Pylon Sign on Lot '2, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition Located Yankee Doodle Road, West of Pilot Knob Road, NE 1/4 of Section 16 B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE Quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Lot 1, Block 1, NE 1/4 of Section 16 C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard) from Setback Requirements for Expansion & Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE Quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road & Washington Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 16 k -:)5D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon Sign for an Office/Warehouse Located Silver Bell & Highway 13, SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 18 13$E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motec P Transmission) for a Pylon Sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition Located Cedarview Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 19 140F. Conditional Use Permit (R. Kaye Scheurenbrand) for a Commercial Boarding Kennel on Approximately 5.8 Acres Located South of A Cliff Road and East of Dodd Road, NE 1/4 of Section 36 G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life (Opus Corp) to Split Lot 18 and Combine the N 1/2 with Lots 19 & 20, Creating a new 4 -Acre Parcel Loacted North of Lone Oak Road on West Service Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, Part of SE 1/4 5 of Section 12 C,� fH. _Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD (Planned Development) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) for Approximately 111 Acres Located East of T.H. 149.& South of T.H. 55, SE 1/4 of Section 12 �(e'jI. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Sideyard Setback Require- ment for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition, Located East of Galaxie Avenue on West Wind Tr., NW 1/4 of Section 32 p \45 J. Special Permit (Overhill Replat - Grand Oaks Development) to Allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval, Located at Lot 2, Block 4, Overhill Farms 2nd Addition Replat, East of Dodd, North of Hay Lake Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25 pkl 3K. 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance \ Renewal VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses on \ Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh, 2882 Sibley Memorial Highway, West of Highview Park, 5112 1 Section 4 B. .Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee \ C. Public Improvement Contracts .P lV 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Rd) 1 ,1$32. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Eagandale Lemay 1 Lake 2nd Addition \0\3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Sperry P ` Consolidation Facility Dp Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Daniel Drive) A. Five -Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects I%. VISITORS TO BE REARD (for those persons not on the agenda) Z. S. ADJOURNMENT ,, l_1 40 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 12, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE-'MINUTES] After approval is given to the June 17, 1986, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the June 3 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: DEPARTMENT;HEAD:;BUSINESS A. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. 3M Presentation of a Resusci Junior ---Mr. Tom Hutter, branch operations manager of the Twin Cities sale center at the 3M plant located in Eagan, will present a resusci junior to the Eagan Fire Department. Since two of our firefighters, Scott Wood and Jim Mueller, have given instruction time for the CPR training, they would like to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and Jim on behalf of all the employees involved in this training at 3M. Chief Childers and firefighters Wood and Mueller. will be at the meeting for the presentation. Enclosed on page _ J is a copy of a letter that was sent by Mr. Hutter to Fire Chief Childers, regarding the equipment and the official recognition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: There is no formal action required. However, the minutes should reflect the acceptance of a monetary receipt for specialized fire department equipment. f Twin Cities Sales Center/31Y! PO Box 33211 St. Paul, Minnesota 551333211 3130 Lexington Avenue South Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2239 612/733 3300 May 28, 1986 Mr. Robert Childers 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Childers: Two of your firemen, Scott Wood and Jim Mueller gave unselfishly of their time to furnish instruction in the art of CPR to several of our 3M employees. We would like to express our appreciation for this ser- vice by presenting you with the enclosed check for $375.00 to be used for the purchase of a Resusci Junior which I understand is a mannequin used for water rescue and resuscitation training. If possible, we would like you to make arrangements to purchase this through your normal channels and then advise us when it would be convenient for us to present this to you in a formal ceremony at one of your meetings or at a City Council Meeting. At that time I would plan to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and Jim on • behalf of all of the employees involved in this training and 3M. Leroy Kugel, as our on-site representative, would also accompany me for this presentation. I would appreciate your giving me a call or dropping me a note as to the time and place that it would be appropriate for this presentation. On behalf of 3M and our employees I want to thank you for making time available for Scott and Jim to provide this training for our employees. It is sincerely appreciated. Sincerely, T.C�u ter Branch Operations Manager Twin Cities Sales Center/3M TCH:jah cc: Leroy Kugel 0 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two FIRE DEPARTMENT CONT"D 2. Resignation of Fire Chief Childers --Bob Childers, Fire Chief has formally submitted his resignation to be effective July 5, 1986, from the Eagan Fire Department and the po ition of Fire Chief, for the City of Eagan. Enclosed on page is a copy of his resignation letter. (There is additional information concerning the position of Fire Chief and is'enclosed as a part of the Informative Memo.) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Bob Childers as Fire Chief for the City of Eagan. 3 June 5, 1986 TO: EAGAN CITY EAGAN FIRE TOM HEDGES EAGAN FIRE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE BOARD DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION FROM: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF ® I hereby submit my resignation as of July 5, 1986 from the Eagan Fire Department and the position of Fire Chief for the City of Eagan. The purpose of my resignation is for retirement after serving twenty three (23) years as an Eagan Volunteer Fire Fighter. T have most certainly enjoyed my association with the fire department and the city. I fdel I have personally gained much from my experience. I deeply appreciate the support I have received from the members of the fire department and all the departments of the city. It sure helped me accomplish my job much easier. ® I wish the fire department well and I will be available to help when I can. Respectfully yours, Bob Childers BC/ma Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Stop Sign Request, Yorktown Place and Trenton Road --In the early part of April, Charles Souza of 4248 Trenton Road (.Lot 1, Block 3, Northview Meadows) contacted the Police Department for a complaint regarding traffic volumes and property damage to his corner lot at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Trenton Road. Subsequently, the Police Department reviewed the situation on April 12 and 13, with Officer Kasat submitting his report enclosed on page 6� . On April 15, Councilman Wachter relayed this property owner's • concern to the Council and it was referred to the Engineering Division for further investigation.. Enclosed on pageZ is a copy of the report prepared by the Assistant City Engineer regarding the request for a three way stop sign at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Trenton Road. Earlier this year, the Engineering Division received a similar request for a stop sign at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. In this similar situation, this intersection did not meet the warrants for the installation of a stop sign and the requesting property owner was so informed by the letter enclosed on page �/, . Mr. Souza has been informed that this item will be considered by the Council at the June 17 meeting for final resolution. It is the staff's recommendation that a three way stop sign not be installed, but rather yield signs be placed on Trenton Road at the intersection with Yorktown Place and on Yorktown Place at the intersection with Braddock Trail. Enclosed on page is a map showing the relationship of the two intersections be ng discussed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM': To approve the installation of three way stop signs or yield signs at the intersections of Trenton Road/Yorktown Place and Yorktown Place/Braddock Trail. ('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J M1� V � A_ p i o O� �lN�l�6i✓,y �YO%, y'�)d�,S s!/�y/Yi1 �d`� � ti //" �Ngp��j /�»'/1i lv,'Y s°eS p/ �/N® >r r ��n7�rlsx� rr��y>o u sr is ;)s y ('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J M1� V � A_ p T Kre.s cols• eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r 4 " ' � !4 op 4,0 �,v r • i o O� 7 ❑ D' n` Z Mm ❑ � ti Y Z �l I �y f T Kre.s cols• eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r 4 " ' � !4 op 4,0 �,v r • 7 ❑ D' n` Z Mm ❑ � ti Y Z T Kre.s cols• eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r 4 " ' � !4 op 4,0 �,v r • MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: APRIL 24, 1986 SUBJECT: 3 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF YORKTOWN PLACE AND TRENTON ROAD At the April 15, 1986, Council meeting, Coucilman Wachter informed me of a complaint he received from the owner of Lot 1, Block 3, of Northview Meadows Addition. The complainant contacted the Police Department regarding his concerns for the high traffic volumes associated with the modal homes located just north of him. In addition, the complainant alleges that vehicles have been jumping the curb and driving over the corner of his lot. Chief Berthe had two officers investigate the complaint. They did not see anyone drive over the complainant's yard, however, they felt a three-way stop sign would be appropriate at • the Trenton Road and Yorktown Place intersection. Attached is a copy of the officer's report. I disagree with the recommended three-way stop sign to be used as a speed control. The manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises specifically warns against using stop signs for controlling speed limit. Also, I do not believe this intersection would meet with any of the following warrants found in the manual: 1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 4. An intersection where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. 40 Yorktown Place is a street built to normal residential standards. I would estimate the traffic volumes upon full development of the area surrounding Yorktown Place to be about 700 trips per day. I would anticipate the builders of the existing model homes to convert those into residential units by the end of this year. Then the traffic will be based on normal residential usage. In summary, I feel that a three-way stop sign placement at the Yorktown Place and Trenton Road intersection would be an inappropriate means of speed limit control. I would be happy to discuss %�tth%his in more detail with you if you would so desire. Assistant City Engi er RMH/]] cc: Jay Berthe, Police Chief Ted Wachter, City Councilman ®■ 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P - BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN .1AMES A. SMITH - MC ELLISON ' THEODORE WACHTER March 12, 1986 COUnC° Memms - .- - -. THOMAS HEDGES CIN Adminstf Wo1 EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ON Clerk KAREN MURPHY 4253 BRADDOCK TRAIL EAGAN MN 55123 RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL - YORKTOWN PLACE AT BRADDOCK TRAIL Dear Karen: I am writing in response to your request for a stop sign at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. The City has standard conditions which need to be met to warrant stop signs. These conditions are outlined in a manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Our office has looked at this intersection and was unable to meet any of these conditions to warrant a stop sign. Although you expressed an interest in a stop sign, we feel that a yield sign would be more appropriate.. This would catch the attention of the drivers without requiring a complete stop in all cases. Therefore, if you would like to request placement of a yield sign in writing to our. office, I think we would have a better chance of getting a method of traffic control at Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. Sincerely, ai,d E. Knudsen Engi eering Technician CEK/jj N THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SEC. r 6� O 7 R / 3 CO' "Y D N. CARSON I ``, V _ (mr♦ 9 L/:=v L/a CAvOTT COUNT I Y �Y ' / ®C 1` _ Y. VINN E.L1 '., � :.i R23 SLPTEVBER,1.11 , a CN IH SEC 24, T. 27, R.'3 AID :T— _ _ __ _ r FP HI GFN'AY ......r.n .r.-- NO )D n,. ,1.: ,.. , ,Y __ .r.. •. �.. £✓ � ¢ '• .- ,.• DIF „!LC-�Y ic,;� _ , jDIf REI' gDADIT— CDIIXTT rL TATE "rn'� SID ••��, XIG WAYi (_EFCP0 Po'F\\ fy+'..'�y`1 a _ ye-•. �C'= f. I. ' ...r. � �/Fi + g �w<��E v JI v r. 'e •. v I .3.r� �' ' 2 Cil: O {i _"�. r Is S •2 �¢ Wlrq 1 1 'Q { 2 Q ,..• �, � L •° � .° PL CE - ^9 , IOnKTONN �• '• �, •rY PLACE ��sl=11•n•�.r., UN � E '� • ���,, ,�. L.. '�/ � . � i 1 t E>, F.�a;/ii ADDI!TIN: ,s r =1t,.—SUN _ .� P�`_. \ ° ••�`_ 5 r� i erre,, ; , v ,I; I L L. ; { , • '� .EISSD "; � t "r> i I r^xL..�x aacE i .>=� � - .. � -'�'• 'l - I s � .,rr f �r: � .� y� , r• •I�: ti �� ..V Ei"r�„r�l., s= ,FI ?', �>• f. f I +,�� _ - err. 4 .�F � •..r. .. " a ° ~ i`�'.r G\alb :� ..., ..' ;ur,.r .,'. ". � .L �•cre �, „�'• . :z' n .l ��r .i $I :l. o.° .i ••�� r•..'_n *TE LACKYDRI w r7— KING---- SECG�D 2 1g e.DJI TION �- Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four CONSENT AGENDA There are fourteen ( 14 ) items on Items requiring one (1) motion Council wishes to discuss any those items should be removed under Additional Items unless the agenda referred to as Consent by the City Council. If the City of the items in further detail, from the Consent Agenda and placed the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page is a list of contractors who are renewing or who have been selected' and retained • as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor licenses as presented. /Q CONTRACTORS' LICENSE JUNE 17, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTOR 1. REGGIE KAJER CONST 2. KEN SMITH'S REMODELING 3. TWOMEY THE CARPENTER 4. J.R. UZZELL BLDRS HEATING & VENTILATING 1. PREFERRED MECHANICAL SERVICES INC PLUMBING 1. A & G PLUMBING 2. WILLIAM GADTKE 3. CHEMED CORPORATION • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Police Officer --An additional police officer position was approved for the 1986 budget effective July 1, 1986. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Curtis Sisco, who is presently a. Community Service Officer with the Eagan Police Department, be appointed to the new police officer position. As the Council is aware, Eagan C.S.O. 's have completed the education and skills requirements necessary for P.O.S.T. licensure. They have been processed through a rigorous interview and screening procedure before they are selected as C.S.O.'s and have spent many months in training in the Eagan Police Depart- ment. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Curtis Sisco as a Policer Officer, effective July 1, 1986. Item 2. C.S.O.--If the hiring of Curtis Sisco is approved, a vacancy will exist for a C.S.O. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Kenneth Conyers be appointed to that C.S.O. position. Conyers is P.O.S.T. certified and has previously served as an officer in the Eagan Police Department. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Kenneth Conyers as a C.S.O. in the Eagan Police Department. Item 3. Compost Site Monitors --Two positions are available for the part-time, temporary position of Compost Site Monitor. These employees would work only on Saturday afternoons and only ® one employee would work any one Saturday. It is, however, neces- sary to have two Compost Site Monitors in order to insure that a monitor is available. It is the recommendation of Administrative Assistant Hohenstein that Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz be hired to fill these temporary positions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz as temporary compost site Monitors for the 1986 season. Item 4. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker --It is the recommenda- of Superintendent of Utilities and Buildings• Connolly that David Erickson be hired to fill the one remaining vacant seasonal. utility maintenance worker position. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of David Erickson as a Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker. /v Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Six FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/ROBBINS ADDITION C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Robbins Addition which is located in the SW Quadrant of 1-494 and T.H.149 as shown on a copy of the plat enclosed on page All conditions of placed on the preliminary plat approval November 17, 1981, have been complied with and the final plat conforms with the previous preliminary plat approval concept. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Robbins Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk • to execute all related documents. /3 I VCMRT YAP rrr ; 7r118,.cr n 00 rJ DETAIL rno $CALF) EXHIBIT it Aa Ah ROBINS A®®IiI®N r r✓1 P` INTERSTATE A OUTLOT ti 7a w� j V we.9iPr'! { 1 1 • �I r ar QO' ♦ % �rM P' 3 I i / b 8 \\\ i c °Te Al<.rJK !A. r. rn •[� 10, b ti Ati P N' !� ��ilro' w EXHIBIT it Aa Ah ROBINS A®®IiI®N r r✓1 P` INTERSTATE • ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y YCar� i, •tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C. YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q .i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1. 494 r..T. rrr w rr % // do iu I OUTLOT ti 7a I N i { 1 1 i I 1 ♦ % �rM P' 3 I i / b 8 \\\ Jl c °Te • ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y YCar� i, •tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C. YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q .i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1. 494 r..T. rrr w rr % e 7a N 1 { v m P x b 8 i �y► !� ��ilro' • d/rj X11/ �r..w �.[trr.rr.arir 0K! <Jt'ITIOddlO w// Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 473/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING D. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --With the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob from I -35E to Apple valley in 1987, a preliminary analysis of the storm sewer needs indicate that additional trunk storm sewer improvements and revisions to existing facilities will be required to handle the increased •run-off generated from this major County road improvement.. Subsequently, our consulting engineer has pre- pared a feasibility report addressing the major areas of trunk storm sewer improvements associated with the County road upgrading. These involve modifications to the Evergreen Park lateral storm sewer system, outlets from Berry Patch Park (Mooney Lake) to Patrick Eagan Park and construction of storm sewer across City - owned property south of City Hall. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 473 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held July 15, 1986. 0 Agenda Information Memo June 1,7, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Eight AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS E. Amusement Device Renewals --The City Clerk's office has received applications for local businesses renewing amusement devices:: Attached on. page/ �f is a copy of the list of the amusement device renewals. Al-1%amusement device machines do meet and satisfy City Code regulations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ment device renewals as presented. A6 approve the 1986 amuse - Name & Address 1986 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS Number of Machines - Locations Sam Nilva 5 machines - Cedarvale National Amusement Co. P.O. Box 16206 Minneapolis, MN 55416 D.V.M. Company over 15 machines 119 State Cedarvale Lanes St. Paul, MN 55107 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive 3 machines La Fonda's 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy 4 machines Richard's Food & Liquor 4185 S. Robert Trail ® James Durning 1 machine 4625 Nicols Rd Durnings Eagan, MN 55122 Harold Steinman 2 machines 3300 Minnehaha Ave. S. Eagan Steak House Minneapolis, MN 55403 1448 Yankee Doodle Rd Theisen Vending 2 machines 3804 Nicollet Ave. S. Eagandale Club Minneapolis, MN 55409 3330 Pilot Knob Rd 2 machines Al Baker's 3434 Washington Dr • James A. Basta 1 machine Italian Pie Shoppe Italian Pie Shoppe 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan, MN 55122 Harold Awe Company 3 machines 1372 Scheffer Ave. Mr. D's Pizza St. Paul, MN 55116 3904 Beau d'Rue Dr Advance Carter Co. 2 machines 850 Decatur Ave. N. Pizza Hut Minneapolis, MN 55427 3992 Sibley Mem. Hwy. 2 machines Charkist 1975 Senaca Rd Gary Starks over 15 machines 3125 Dodd Road Starks Saloon Eagan, MN 55121 3125 Dodd Road 1 machine Piccolo's Pizzeria 4162 Pilot Knob Road 2 machines Slicer's Restaurant 2113 Cliff Rd • 0 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine SERVICE STATION RENEWALS F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals --There are ten (10) service station permits requiring renewal for the period of July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1987. A list of those service station permits are enclosed on page All service stations appear to meet regulations set forth in e City Code, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve service station permit renewals as presented. O • SERVICE STATION PERMITS JUNE.17, 1986 AGENDA Country 66 3206 Sibley Mem. Hwy. Eagan 55121 Q Petroleum 4206 Nicols Rd Eagan 55122 Superamerica Diffley Rd & Sibley Mem. Hwy. Eagan 55122 Superamerica Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan 55122 Yankee Square Standard 1424 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan 55122 ® Eagan Service Center (Union 76) 4195 Nicols Rd Eagan 55122 Sinclair Station 3946 Cedar Eagan 55122 Eagan Standard 4205 Nicols Rd Eagan 55122 Texaco Fuel Stop 3150 Dodd Road Eagan 55121 Cedar Cliff Amoco 4600 Slater Rd Eagan 55122 There are ten service station permits which should be renewed for the period of July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987. N I* Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten TRAILER PERMIT'RENEWALS G. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals --Trailer permit renewals for 1986/19'87 have been processed by the City Clerk's office and inspected by the Building Inspections Division. The City Council has previously requested a detailed review of each trailer permit to determine whether the purpose is consistent with the reasons that were given for the granting of the actual trailer permit. Enclosed on pages 7_through _ is a copy of the Chief Building Inspector's review and a list of trailer permit renewals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the trailer permit renewals as presented. CW Y MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE.PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: JUNE 13, 1986 RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS FOR 1986/87 Administrative Intern, Cheryl Johannes, has investigated the current status of the proposed trailer permit renewals. The status of each permit on record is the same as when granted. We have received complaints of unsavory conditions at 670 Lone Oak Road and they have either been rectified or were unfounded. The permit at 3850 Cornation Drive issued to James Horne was originally for one year, to terminate June 1985 and in 1985 a renewal was granted for an additional year. A request for another one-year extension has been received and awaits Council action. • If you require further information, please contact me. DP/j • 1 f:. I ,t II C • TO: DALE PETERSON FROM: LIZ WITT DATE: JUNE 9, 1986 RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87. I have no idea of their current status. In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85. I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit expired June 1, 1986. Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv • approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home for summer construction help. I have heard some complair about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home". When do they disband? I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if possible. f w, 1 f:. I ,t II C • TO: DALE PETERSON FROM: LIZ WITT DATE: JUNE 9, 1986 RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87. I have no idea of their current status. In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85. I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit expired June 1, 1986. Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv • approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home for summer construction help. I have heard some complair about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home". When do they disband? I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if possible. RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS 1. Tripp Oil.Co. permitted prior to 1970 and 3085 Hwy 13 remain in office use. Eagan, MN 55121 2. Earl Marotzke permitted prior to 1970 and 535 Gun Club Road remains in use as a family home. Rosemount, MN 55068 3. Alwin & Lyle Schultz permitted prior to 1970 and 1315 Carriage Hills Drive remains in use as a familyhome. Eagan, MN 55121 4. Edmund Schwanz permitted in 1980 and remains in 810 Yankee Doodle Rd use as a residence for Mr. Schwanz Eagan, mN 55123 mother. -S 5. Levi Heuer permitted in 1983 and remains in 550 Diffley RD use as a residence for George Meister. Eagan, MN 55123 ® 6: Dakota Homes permitted in 1972 and remains in use 3660 Dodd Road as a sales office for mobile homes. Eagan, MN 55121 n LJ v3 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE/VOTING ACCESSIBILITY H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility - Both Federal legislation and Minnesota statutes require that all polling places located within a municipality used for primary and general elections be surveyed to determine whether the facility is accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. If any of the polling places located within the 14 precincts are not acces- sible and it is determined after a survey that there are no other locations that could be used that are accessible to the handicapped and elderly, it is necessary to appoint a special advisory committee for the purpose of continuing an effort to locate a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct 3 for future elections. If Highsite Apartments is approved • by the Secretary of State's office as the polling location for Precinct 3 after a report is filed by the Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee that there are no alternatives, then elections judges are allow to assist the handicapped or elderly voter with curbside voting or some other means available during the election. For additional information on. this item, refer to a memo prepared by Administrative Assistant Witt describing the federal polling place accessibility law on page 2ij . • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Betty Preston, Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler as members of the Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee for the purpose of continuing all efforts to locate a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct 3 for future elections. a� TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT DATE:JUNE 10, 1986 RE: FEDERAL POLLING PEACE ACCESSIBILITY LAW Federal legislation and Minnesota Statutes require that all polling places for the 1986 primary and general elections be surveyed to determine whether they are accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. A survey report is to be completed for each precinct and the reports are to be filed with the Secretary of State's office by July 11 1986. Carolyn and I have completed our survey of Eagan's 14 polling places. All but precinct 3 (High Site recreation building) are accessible or can be made access- ible. We conducted a windshield survey of the precinct, which is bounded by Pilot Knob Road, Lone Oak Road, east city limits and Yankee Doodle Road. Most of the structures are industrial/warehouse buildings which probably could not accommodate a public polling place. Other structures have security constraints which preclude public access. • We did contact Federal Land Company regarding Waterview Tower. They really were not interested in a short or long term commitment.. We -looked at the Lemay Lake Apartments which'are under construction but don't know.if they have an accessible and otherwise appropriate place for our use. Because the High Site building has stairs it is not accessible. We have provided a portable voting device to anyone who requests it, but the federal legislation says this is -riot sufficient. The Voting Act states that if the City officials determine that no available place is accessible or can be made accessible, a VotingAccessibility Advisory Committee must be established: The committee must be made up of at least 50% representation from individual or organizations representing the elderly and disabled voters. Because we do not have an accessible polling place in Precinct 3 and must report by July 1, I 'request that the City Council appoint Betty Preston > •Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler to .the Advisory Committee. The recommended appointees' represent the handicapp, elderly and Precinct Three"election judges. Following Council.approval, the Advisory Committee will make a determination of accessibility for a Precinct 3 polling place. If the committee cannot find an available place, they must file a certified request for exemption from compliance. The regulations further require that the elderly or handicapped voter must be provided an alternative means, i.e., curbside voting, which we have available. ACTION TO BE TAKEN: Approval of Betty Preston , Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Lee.ler to the Voting.Accessibility Advisory Committee. Staff will continue its efforts to locate 'a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct 3 for future elections. -5 ,0 Agenda Information Memo June -17, 198,6, City Council Meeting Page Twelve VACATE UTILITY IVE PETITION L. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Deerwood School Addition) --We have received a request to vacate the utility line easement for the water line through the Deerwood School Addition due to a change in alignment based on the final site plan for the Deerwood Elementary School. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and order a public hearing to consider a vacation of the utility easement for the Deerwood School Addition. PROJECT 476, RECEIVE REPORT ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (HIGHVIEW AVENUE) J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Highview Avenue - Streets) --At the May 6 meeting, the Council received a petition requesting the completion of the eastern 300 feet of Highview Avenue to City standards. In response to this petition, the Council authorized the feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal discussion and action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 476' (Highview Avenue - Streets) and order the public hearing to be held July 15, 1986. CONTRACT 85-19, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition) --Contract 85-19 provided for the installation of streets and utilities for the construction of Corporate Center Curve Road to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition. Prior to completion of the final wear surface, a large "sink hole" occurred which required corrective repair action. During the excavation of repair, it was discovered that this settlement resulted from the previous deposition of construction debris (concrete curbing, etc.) approximately 15 feet below ground level. Because this corrective action was not a defect of the City's contractor, this work was above and beyond the scope of the contract and should be processed through a change order which would add $2,607.01 to the base contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve. Change Order #1 to Contract 85-19 in the amount of $2,607.01. Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986;, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen AND UT - L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition) --With the proposed development of the Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the developer is requesting a reconfiguration of the drainage and utility ease- ment dedicated for the pond south of Ashbury Road and east of Birchpond Road to allow the development of single family houses. With all requirements of the petition being in order, it is appropriate for the Council to schedule a public hearing for formal discussion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate the drainage and utility easement over a portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition and schedule the public hearing to be held on July 15, 1985. a7 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986., City Council Meeting Page Fourteen APPROVE FINAL PLAT, 'TEM ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for T.E.M. Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the T.E.M. Addition located south of Golden Meadow Road as shown by the map enclosed on pageeAll conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council on May 21, 1986, have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the T.E.M. Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. M • VICINITY MAP a -IRE it + M Ill%% SEt':rl TEM M. ADDI TION MINA" 1110 UII(In EASENENIS MC YIdN 111115: b;y S I..I ;l ; .ixlx.n;.. ;p;c.lp. . pio: n;.q 1.1 ilry.. A. p;p 10 I. pl.1. olpnia. IplAl.x..ptl/oinirq aln.l I�p....xpn —N— cp .wrmof ,p A y n. S'cr— is. l...:, N(w.:, i6 up.. o p p.ci,q of xo.rn A e.a•...5 .�n,l.. u . w lur. A, pp'.. 51. A,;6 �Rn AN, I p .s.�n. l ....p 'xl]Irt15-. -1... a p,.A.. pn, • III .In I. An /ip .—., I— - SIGMA 'UR BURYFVIINIB BHRVIC HO ew..e+.o p.e Nxurl�lA.NTin 0 Aaenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen APPROVE FINAL PLAT, HAMPTON HEIGHTS ADDITION N. Final Plat Approval for Hampton Heights Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Hampton Heights Addition, located south of Yankee Doodle Road, adjacent to the Public Works Maintenance Facility as shown by the map enclosed on page * All conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on May 21, 1985, have been satisfactorily complied with except for the installation of the trailway from Yankee Doodle Road to the Blackhawk Glen Addition. At a special meeting of the. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on June 11, 1986, that Commission rescinded their previous require- ment for this trail. Although the development contract agreement provided wording for compliance with this trailway requirement, if the Council concurs with the Park Commission's recommendation to eliminate this requirement, this can be resolved through an addendum to the contract and an immediate reduction in the financial guarantee as it relates to the trailway requirement. All other final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Hampton Heights Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • *Special Note: The map showing the final plat was not available for inclusion with this packet. The map will be forwarded with. the Additional Information packet on Monday. 30 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the May 6, 1986, City Council meeting a demographic study and request to amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance to allow for five (5) licenses,with the new license application to be issued in the northerly part of the City, was reviewed as presented by the Federal Land Company. As a part of the deliberation by the City Council there was some. consideration given to removing any limit on the number of off -sale licenses allowing the number of off -sale liquor stores to be controlled by the market place, similar to all other retail establishments. The following action was taken: Smith moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to authorize one additional off -sale liquor license in. the northerly portion of the City, generally in the Town Centre area, and further that a public hearing be scheduled for the June 17, 1986, Council meeting to consider removing the restrictions or revising the number of off -sale liquor licenses approved by City ordinance, noting at the time of adoption of the original policy in 1973, only Cedarvale Shopping Center was in existence; that an application would be entertained by the City Council for an additional license in the Town Centre area, and further, to authorize the revision of the Eagan Ordinance to provide for five off -sale liquor licenses within the City. "All Councilmembers voted 'yes.'" J The City Administrator has asked the Police Department to give consideration to a proposed regulatory change in removing the present ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor license. A response prepared by the Chief of Police is enclosed on page 3Z7 for your review. There are no additional thoughts or • staff background on this issue. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an ordinance amendment_ that would remove the ceiling or any regulation on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that could be granted within the City of Eagan. 3/ M 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 23 Nny 1986 TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSES police department JAY M. BERTHE Chill nnella PATRICK J. GEAGAN AdmH.,1 .lUPYIn KENNETH D.ASZMANN ouml,.�r.Pmn I have conferred with Captains Geagan and Aszmann about their thoughts concerning additional liquor licenses within the City of Eagan. Our thoughts fall into three categories: 1. Those of a criminal nature, such as selling to minors. We now try to control this by sending a minor in to purchase liquor from each of the off sale liquor stores within the city. This is done at random times during the year with emphasis on checking each and every liquor establishment so that enforce- ment is fair and equal. Additional liquor stores would only take more time and effort as far as the police department is concerned. 2. The necessary background checks done by this department on each applicant for licensing. Captain Geagan will submit a separate memo on this issue. 3. Noncriminal issues, which triggers in each of us our own personal philosphies, such as, will Eagan appear to have an awful lot of liquor establishments within the city and thus, are we encouraging drinking by making it too available?, etc., etc. In summary, the police department, as the enforcement arm of the city, would not have a serious problem in enforcing the laws governing the operation of off sale liquor stores. n�' i . Berthe Jk 31/ THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Seventeen PROJECT 475/DANIEL DRIVE B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets & Utilities) --On May 21, the City Council received a feasibility report for the proposed upgrading of Daniel Drive (formerly South Wescott Hills Drive) necessary for the development of the Northview Meadows Second Addition south of Northview Elementary School. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and reference during the public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially assessed property owners informing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineering will be available to discuss in detail • all aspects of this proposed project and will be available to answer any questions of the Council and/or general public. 0 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 475 (Daniel Drive - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. 33 REPORT ON DANIEL. DRIVE 0 UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS r PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49395 eawdu - 9 `ftq weeu SL Pa"4 M/wweeala 3 `/ Bonestroo, Ros 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.6364600 May 22, 1986 Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Daniel Drive Utility 6 Street Improvement Project No. 475 File No. 49395 Dear Mayor and Council: uuo G. Runrvrou,. P. E. RW"" W. Rwrnr, PE. J CL And"hi, P.E. 8m✓7uN A, LrmG,q. P,E. Hrrhern E'. Turner, P.E. lwreo ('. Uh✓rr IlL Glenn R. CwY. P.E. Avuh.4. GurJm. It E. Ihmnm E. N.". II E. R,, hu,d W. F.,e,, P.., RUG,/ G. Shurw h,. I'. E. Murrl/r L..So,.ulu. Ir.E. IA.nWdG Hu, .,d, VE. Jay A. 0 ... dmr, V. E. AIu,Y A. llumun. P.E. 7,d K. IJJ✓: V.F. Mrrhurl 7'. Ruuurrunrr. It 1. NUMv/ R. /'Ir//rr4. I'. 1:, M.'d O. Lm1uw. P E. /Aurum k', Prrrnun. It E. Ahchuw C. L'n'h, HR. Aurrn L. Illlhr, V1. Jmnr, R. ArWun 1, PF A'rwmh P. And" nini, Il L. A'rvh A. HUJurwmi, Pl:. Mm1 R. Rule, PE. Rnhrn ('. HurrrY. A.I.A. 7hurrrv/ E. A.,,,, P.E: I hudn d. Frulvm I e. M. Pe.0A. imnun 11. (llvm Sown AL Ehrrnn Transmitted herewith is our report for Daniel Drive, Project No. 475. This report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and street construction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, EONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. -7�� A"4 - Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws' of tha StatMinnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: May 22, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 n' Approved by: Department of P" lic Works _ Date: 5294d 35` . F- 1 LJ 0 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and street for Daniel Drive. Daniel Drive serves as the southwesterly boundary of Northview Meadows an existing single family develop- ment, and the proposed single family development Northview Meadows 2nd Addi- tion. The property southwesterly of Daniel Drive is unplatted and undeveloped property presently zoned for commercial and light business use. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for ® the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 8" PVC sanitary sewer in Daniel Drive to serve Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and the abutting property to the southwest. The sanitary sewer is a continuation of that sanitary sewer serving Northview Meadows Addition presently located in the southerly portion of Daniel Drive formerly known as South Wescott Hills Drive. It is intended the sanitary sewer will continue westerly as Daniel Drive continues westerly to serve the adjacent property as it develops. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 12" DIP water main in Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. The 12" water main will connect to an existing 6" water main at Daniel Drive and Braddock Trail. The 12" diameter main is required to serve the commercial property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. This 12" main will ultimately connect to the existing trunk mains in Lexington Avenue and Co. Rd. No. 30. Also included is the proper number of valves and hydrants. This area is located in the high pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressure of approximate- ly 74 psi and 68 psi respectively. Page 1. 5294d _ / Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing a storm sewer in Curry Trail and modifications to the existing storm sewer presently serving the existing Northview Meadows. The storm sewer under this project will be constructed from the proposed outlet control structure on the south side of Co. Rd. No. 30 to the south along a Lot line in Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and will continue within Curry Trail to Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. This storm sewer will ultimately be extended to the south to provide an outlet for Pond JP -28 when future development dictates the Pond JP -28 out- let. Modifications to the existing storm sewer serving Northview Meadows Addi- tion is due to the realignment of Daniel Drive and the resulting reconstruc- tion of .the Rogers Court and Trenton Trail intersections. In addition, it is proposed that a dry ponding area be created as shown on the attached drawing adjacent to Co. Rd. No. 30 designated as Pond JP -28A. Design considerations for the pond are as follows: Pond NWL HWL Storage Outflow Designation NWL Area I1WL Area (ac.ft.) (cfs) Pond JP -28A 940 0.1 ac. 951 1.4 ac. 8.6 20 To create Pond JP -28A, it will be necessary to construct an outlet control structure within the existing 48" RCP culvert beneath Co. Rd. No. 30 to re- strict the available flow down to 20 cfs. Restricting the flow through this culvert will help to minimize any downstream drainage and erosion problems north of Co. Rd. 30. In addition, it will require a smaller downstream storm sewer pipe than the 42" shown on the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes constructing Daniel Drive to a 9 ton design section 44' wide from about Rogers Court to the west Page 2. 5294d 37 0 • edge of the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition. The developer of the Northview Meadows built the easterly half (22') of South Wescott Hills Road. This road was to ultimately be upgraded to a 44' wide street when the adjacent .property developed. The existing portion of South Wescott Hills Road adjacent the pro - posed Northview Meadows Addition is proposed to be widened as part of this project to complete the construction of South Wescott Hills Drive and rename South Wescott Hills Drive to Daniel Drive. To improve traffic circulation. it is proposed to revise the alignment of Daniel Drive from Braddock Trail south- erly to a point where Rogers Court and Trenton Trail will connect to Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. This will discourage the future com- mercial traffic from using the residential neighborhood streets. Trenton Trail and Rogers Court will be reconstructed as 32' wide residential streets in which the existing surface and curbing for old South Wescott Hills, Drive will be utilized as much as possible. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 5294d CONSTRUCTION AREA NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 NORTHVIEW MEADOWS Lot 23, Block 1 Lot 37, 38, 44, Block 4 Lot 1, Block 7 Page 3. 3� COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 46,920 Water Main 67,500 Storm Sewer 78,650 Street - Trenton Trail 6 Rogers Court 23,440 Daniel Drive 152,530 TOTAL .......................................... $369,040 The total estimated project cost is $369,040 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral sanitary sewer on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral water main on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. Trunk area water main was previously assessed. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral storm sewer on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. Trunk area storm sewer for this area has not been assessed and it is not proposed to be assessed until the unplatted parcels either develop Page 4. 5294d or a major trunk storm sewer project for this area is required. Northview Meadows 2nd Addition will be assessed their trunk area storm sewer obligation as part of the development agreement between the City and the developer. STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street on a front foot basis to the abutting property. It is proposed to assess all lots within the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition equally on a per lot basis their proportionate share of the residential equivalent for that portion of Daniel Drive which abuts that subdivision. The remaining cost of Daniel Drive will be assessed entirely to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. The ® total cost of reconstructing the Trenton Trail and Rogers Court extension to Daniel Drive will also be assessed entirely to the unplatted property located southwesterly of the Trenton Trail extension. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: A. SANITARY SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment B. WATER MAIN ® Lateral Lateral Assessment C. STORM SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment D. STREET Lateral Lateral Assessment Project Cost $ 46,920 $ 46,920 $ 67,500 $ 67,500 $ 78,650 $ 78,650 $175,970 $175,970 There are no trunk funds required for this project. Page 5. 5294d 0 Revenue Balance $ 46,920 $ 46,920 - 0 - $ 67,500 $ 67,500 - 0 - $ 78,650 $ 78,650 - 0 - $175,970 $175,970 - 0 - PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 6. 5294d T' May 21, 1986 June 17, 1986 June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 Fall, 1986 Summer, 1987 Springy 1988 E • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROSECT NO. 475 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920 Page 7. 5294d �v A. SANITARY SEWER 1,270 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 15'-25'dp. in pl. @ $20.00/l.f. $25,400 110 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,100 3 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 2,700 ® 30 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,800 2 Each 8"x 6" wye branch @ $50.00/each 100 15 Lin.ft. 6" PVC riser pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft. 150 2 Each Connect 8" PVC to existing 8" PVC @ $500.00/each 1,000 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1,120 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,120 Total $34,370 +5% Contingencies 1,720 $36,090 ® +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,830 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920 Page 7. 5294d �v B. WATER MAIN 1,620 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water wain @ $20.00/lin.ft. $32,400 180 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main @ $12.00/lin.ft. 2,160 2 Each hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 2 Each 12" Butterfly valve 5 box @ $800.00/each 1,600 5 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $400.00/each 2,000 5,100 Lbs. Fittings in place @ $1.50/lb. 7,050 2 Each Connect 12" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 1,240 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,240 Total $49,450 +5% Contingencies 2,470 $51,920 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 15,580 TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................... $67,500 5294d Page 8. P • Page 9. 5294d 0T C. STORM SEWER 150 Lin.ft. 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @$38.00/lin.ft. $ 5,700 650 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 18,200 560 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 13,440 70 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 1,400 5 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 5,500 2 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 1,800 7 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 5,600 LUMP SUM Construct outlet control structure in existing 48" ® RCP @ Co. Rd. No. 30 @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 2 Each Reconstruct existing CB as MH @ $500.00/each 1,000 1 Each Connect to existing storm sewer @ $500.00/each 500 4 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 200 1,280 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,280 Total $57,620 +5% Contingencies 2,880 $60,500 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 18,150 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................... $78,650 Page 9. 5294d 0T D. STREET a. Trenton Trail Extended 6 Rogers Court 1,400 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd. $ 1,400 550 Sq.yds. Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,100 90 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft. 270 200 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 600 100 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 600 500 Ton Class 5 100% crushed aggregate base @ $7.50/ton 3,750 110 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton 1,320 110 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 1,430 12 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton 2,160 60 Ton Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 90 600 Lin.ft. 8618 Concrete curb and gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 3,300 5 Each Adjust MH, CB 6 GV box @ $150.00/each 750 0.4 Acre Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000/ac. 400 Total $17,170 +5G Contingencies 860 • $18,030 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 5,410 TOTAL.............................................. $23,440 Page 10. 5294d 05 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200 TOTAL............................................. $152,530 Page 11. 5294d A b. Daniel Drive 2,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.50/cu.yd. $ 5,000 8,000 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd. 8,000 600 Sq.yds. Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,200 240 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb S gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft. 720 400 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,200 200 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,200 6,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton 30,000 1,300 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton 15,600 650 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 8,450 110 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton 19,800 400 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 600 3,050 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb 6 gutter @ $5.50/lin.ft. 16,775 12 Each Adjust MH, CB b GV box @ $150.00/each 1,800 1.4 Acre Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac. 1,400 Total $111,745 +5% Contingencies 5,585 ® $117,330 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200 TOTAL............................................. $152,530 Page 11. 5294d A A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Description NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 B. WATER MAIN NE 1/4. SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 C. STORM SEWER NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 Wp**W9•J APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 475 Assessable Footage 100 720 160 980 520 720 160 150 1,550 520 720 160 530 1,930 Page 12. Y/ Rate/F.F. $47.88 47.88 47.88 $43.55 43.55 43.55 43.55 $40.75 40.75 40.75 40.75 Total Assessment $ 4,788 34,472 7,660 $46;920 $22,645 31,355 6,968 6,532 $67,500 $21,191 29,341 6,520 21,598 $78,650 1-74 0 D. STREET a.) Trenton Trail Extended 5 Ro¢er's Court Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 013-05 420 $55.81 $23,440 420 $23,440 b.) Daniel Drive NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 57.0 $80.85 $ 42,043 Parcel 013-02 720 80.85 58,213 Parcel 010-03 160 80.85 12,936 Parcel 013-05 150 80.85 12,128 Northview Meadows 2nd Addition 1,130 24.08(l) 27,210 2,680 $152,530 (1) Assessment rate equals residential equivalent (32') from the Trunk as- sessment Rates Utilities and Streets, Eagan, Minnesota 1986 and does not include costs associated with grading. 5294d Page 13. Ve SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 375 Parcel Sanitary Water Description Sewer Main NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 $ 4,788 Parcel 013-02 34,472 Parcel 010-03 7,660 Parcel 013-05 Northview Meadows 2nd Addition Lots 1-24, Block 1 & Lots 1-14, Block 2 $22,645 31,355 6,968 6,532 Storm Sewer $21,191 29,341 6,520 21,598 $46,920 $67,500 $78,650 Page 14. 5294d Street $42,043 58,213 12,936 35,568 Total Assessment $ 90,667 153,381 34,084 63,698 27,210 27,210 $175,970 $369,040 1] 0 • U 010-76 010.03 DIFFLEY ROAD 010-75 010.76 (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) s 7 • � r • .O F( R H Ell • (` 1x O \ x • n w .e n v _ , TR IL 1 • n q / D4N/E' r O Zn 1i n Q ie ~ j IY U i PROPOSED oq xx 1. m 8" SANITARY == e i SEWER �o13-o2 i0 eq s 010.04 0 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN, MINNESOTA OPOSED N SANITARY t .WER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER " u n n • BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date'. MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 1 Comm. 49396 010.78 010.77 1 010-75 DIFFLEY ROAD I(COUNTY ROADI No. 30) 16 tY• � v R H E .. •O ,o e • r o \ r PL • \ oMADOki O a a n ,a ie i u 1 _ x •�rj TR IL 'i u u YOR'KT WN • W 4 io • Y U m u u a, u v z PROPOSED o x• I Ei r Y 1211 WATER MAIN ,v • J 10 I Q I 013-02 a zv / 010-03 16 _ ex xx • H POn8 w-ze NYL. 959.0 HWL, 969 I ®s 010-09 D 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN. MINNESOTA n ooi n x Oj O ,• eo 012-01 v EXISTING` `-�A WATER MAIN C' ' O \ a 1 00-05 p �� H n BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul Minn Date: MAY, loos FIG. No. 2 Comm. 49395 010-0e 010-77 OIo-75 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE ol0-16 DIFF�EY ROAD (COUNTY ROADFNO301 I—EXISTING 48 RCP I .0 PROPOSED ����— l POND JP-28A NWL°940.0 HWL•951.0 , � • Y , x, STORAGE ° 8.6 Acre-Feet � R H E 00 IB 'o PL • • x • '• ,• ° mM DWS ' • 9i u =• O : , , • u w .e w w V u • , flirj n TR IL �YORKT WNL PL. 11 19 PROPOSED \\ o STORM SEWER \\ 'Fi r' i\ QR .° ii • , i• W xa14Q \ 015-02 xo 010-03 24 FUTURE STORM SEWER u a , vor.o jv.ze DD/T/ NWL. 956.0 l O Q ,• ,o HW L . 969! 012.01 .• EXISTING __ STORM ' •Poe " {" ' PROPOSED SEWER c� STORM SEWER 5 i ®,. u u \\• PONO JP 50 /// a• SR •• MW1. 964.0 HWL, 9TI.T a• .( N H REMOVE to Ex. CB 9 , BUILD MH i CONSTRUCT CB OVER EK. PIPE 9 se ,x 010-04 013-05 o PROPOSED 0 100 200 300 vm� w u STORM SEWER GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ,• '• DANIEL DRIVE BONESTROO• ROSENE, ANDERLIK UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers STORM SEWER St. Paul, Minn. PROJECT No. 475 Date: MAY, 198s FIG. No. :3] EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49395 010.19 010-05 010-n DIFFLEY ROAD r • , • E� N 1, 5) Oj i, � � 10 �x x° • Y w � U i• u R u xl r � LL •F/ T` 5 O xx I' -I Y i, I io x] , 1• Q 013-02 ,° I It x. n u vono PROPOSE �P.29 STREET i,' ' oDiri MW L. 99E.0 IPAPROVE ENTQQ - ' O O 1• nwl 04Y.4 / b(2-01 44� F -F ., RE �`� ` ••gyp Ct4. EXISTING STREET TO ; BE REMOVE 4 0 , „ 0q 32'F -F a 010.04 0 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS STREETS PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 010-75 010-i6 (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) , 1 EXISTING STREET TO ° BE REMOVED 1x 015 -05 u BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date: MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 4 Comm. 49395 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 458 C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) --With the discovery of the inad- vertent ommissions of mailed notifications for the original public hearing held on January 21, 1986 for this project, it is inap- propriate to continue with the proposed final assessments until such time that the initial public hearing, process can be properly completed. Subsequently, the City Council set a new public hearing to consider the merits of this project to be heard on July 1, 1986. If at the conclusion of that public hearing the project is approved, it would be appropriate to then consider the proposed • final assessments for Project 458. L J Enclosed on pages Js andis a copy of the letter that was sent by registered mail o all affected property owners, informing them of this revised hearing process for both the original public hearing and the proposed final assessment hearing. Based on this action and information that has been forwarded, staff is recommending that the Council close the public hearing and not take any action regarding this assessment role until the public hearing process can be completed and fully compliedwith. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing for final assessments for Project 458 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sewer-). 617" 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE (612)454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH June 10, 1986 MC.EUUSON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members MAS He: Project 458, Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sever c� ;aGoB NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING DATE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Ciry Clem Dear Property Owner: As a result of ongoing analysis relating to the continued growth of our community, and in particular, development within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park, the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department determined that there may be a need for additional storm sewer facilities within this Industrial Park to handle the additional development. On August 6, 1985, the Council authorized the preparation of a preliminary feasibility report to.further evaluate these needs. On November 19, the Council received the completed feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing to be held on January 21, 1986, to discuss the results of this report with all the affected property owners who would be benefitted by these proposed improvements and correspondingly assessed for its related costs. A copy of this report is enclosed for your information. It was recently discovered that several property owners were inadvertently omitted from the notification process of that January 21 public hearing. Because of the City Council and staff's desire to ensure that all property owners within the benefitted drainage district are provided every opportunity to discuss this proposed improvement and the related assessments prior to formal action ordering the related storm sewer construction, a new public hearing date has been scheduled. Recently, you should .have received a notice of a final assessment hearing for the June 17 City Council meeting relating to this project. Due to the City's discovery of the inadvertent omission of previous notification regarding the original public hearing, the City has rescheduled both the public hearing to consider the installation of this project and the related final assessment hearing to July 1, 1986. Enclosed with this letter are two Notices of Hearing which supersede any notices that you may have received at an earlier time regarding Project 458. These notices are summarized as follows: 1. A Notice of Public Hearing scheduled for July 1, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, at which time the City Council will discuss the merits of the proposed project and determine whether or not this project should be constructed. 2. A Notice of Assessment Hearing also scheduled for July 1, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, which will follow the above -referenced initial public hearing. If the project is approved as a result of the public hearing, the City Council will then determine whether the assessments to finance this project should be adopted as proposed. �5 THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY June 10, 1986 Page 2 Unless the Council can be assured that this project will be financed without objections to special assessments from the property within the drainage district, it is questionable whether this project will be improved for construction. If this project is not approved, the City will have to consider placing a moratorium on all future development within this drainage district until such time that adequate drainage facilities can be provided. If both the public and final assessment hearing are concluded without any written objections being submitted, the Council will consider awarding the contract which would allow construction to begin by the middle of July. In order to provide more detailed information, I would like to schedule an informal informational meeting to be held at 1:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall on Tuesday, June 24, 1986. Hopefully, all your questions and concerns can be adequately addressed at that meeting and any unresolved issues can be discussed at the formal hearings on July 1. • IN SUMMARY, ALL PREVIOUS NOTICES REGARDING PROJECT 458 SHOULD BE DISREGARDED AND THE SCHEDULE THAT IS PROVIDED BY THE ENCLOSED NOTICES AND DISCUSSED HEREIN SHOULD NOW CONTROL. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns you may have regarding this letter or the upcoming meetings. Sincerely 'T o.as A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Mark Hanson, Consulting Design Engineer Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk Enclosure r 5� ALSCOR INV JNT VENTURE C/O OPUS CORP BOX 150 MPLS MN 55440 NW MUTUAL LIFE INS CO 720 E WISCONSIN AVE MILWAUKEE WI 53200 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO INC 2855 EAGANDALE BLVD *AN MN 55121 ALSCOR INV 800 OPUS CTR 9900 BREN RD E MINNETONKA MN 55343 AM FRUIT & PRODUCE CO 4 EAGANDALE BLVD PAUL MN 55121 CHICAGO TUBE & IRON CO MN 2940 EAGANDALE RD ST PAUL MN 55121 TERRENCE M & DENNIS STEVENS 2935 SERVICE RD W EAGAN MN 55121 i • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 471 D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 471, West Service Drive (Storm Sewer) ---In response to a petition and waiver of hearing submitted by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance (owners of affected lots), the Council authorized a feasibility and detailed plan preparation for the lateral extension of the storm sewer facilities. along the West Service Drive towards I -35E. Due to the fact that this project is not feasible unless Project 458, as previously discussed, is approved', it would be inappropriate to adopt the final assessment roll prior to the conclusion of the public hearing process for Project 45'8. Also, with the public hearing process being properly compliedwith regarding this project, a continuation of this final assessment hearing to the July 1 meeting would be appropriate.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 471 (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer) until July 1, 1986. M Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty PROJECT 444R/HOLLAND LAKE E. Public Hearing for Project 444R (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --On May 21, the Council received the revised feasi- bility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled the public hearing to be held on June 17. Enclosed on pages through oD is a copy of this report for the Council's review reference during this public hearing process. All property owners proposed to be assessed by this project have been noticed and informed of this public hearing. Representatives of the County Park Department will also be in attendance regarding their relation- ship to this project. Several meetings have been held with the property owners in the Lakewood Hills Addition regarding permission to perform preliminary • survey work in anticipation of this project progression. In addition, on Wednesday evening, June 11, a neighborhood meeting was held at which time our consulting engineer reviewed this proposed project with the affected property owners. Our consultant will be available to further discuss and answer any questions relating to this project that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 444R (Holland Lake, - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • _6� REPORT ON HOLLAND LAKE AREA ® TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 4448 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1955 FILE No. 49355 /3o aa, Rte, f4mJ44" & 4&"c&-tes, Sow. 94 Pa"4 Mow a& to Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612636.4600 May 14, 1986 Honorable Mayor 6 Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Engineers & Architects Re: Holland Lake Area Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 444R Our File No. 49355 Dear Mayor and Council: On. G, tlunauau, PE kuhrr, W. Nwrnr. PE. J -,,h C. Andrlhk. P.E. BraJJwd A. LrmArr,, P.E. R,,hurd E. Turn,, P E, Jau'e+C. Ohm. P.E. Glenn R. C.A. P.E. Ari,S A. GurJun. Y.C. Thumm E. Nuyn. P.C. Rahard W. h'werr. P.E. Raker, G. S9unirhl, Y.E. At.,. L. S.,Mw. P.E. Cbnald C. B.,.,dl. P.E. Jerry A. B ... dan, P.E. Murk A. Hawun. P.E. T,d A'. h,ld. P. E. M,hA d7 Nuunnunn. P.E. Ru Mal N, PJryl,ln ISE. tkrv,d G. LmAwa, P.E. Th.. W. Pn,+an, P.E Mahal C. L,n,h, PE A'urrn L. Willi+, P.E. Jaron R. Mulund, P.E. A'rnne,h P. Andenun, P.E. A'n,h A. tlurhnwnn, P.E. Murk N. Rul/+, Y.E. R.b ,, C. R.,k, A.I.A. Thwnu+E. A.,m, P.E. SmR L. Yaan,. P.E. Charly A. ErirA,ua Lru Al. Pu.rhky Iludm At oh. SuAon M. EGdin Transmitted herewith is our report for Holland Lake Area Project No. 444R trunk storm sewer improvements. This report discusses trunk storm sewer improvements in the Holland Lake area and presents cost estimates and also included is a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws ✓fof Oe StateofMinnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date/e: �MMaay 14, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: r � 4";t ���lV/ Department of Public Works" Date: 6— 5153d 61 30 Year Anniversaryr r1 LJ r SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer in the southeastern portion of the City in the vicinity of Holland Lake. The project proposes, to construct storm sewer outlets for Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, and LP -51 as designated in the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. An alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm sewer out- let for Pond LP -36. These ponds are presently land locked and are receiving storm water runoff from the existing developments adjacent to Wilderness Run Road (Wedgewood Addition, Sheffield Addition, Oakwood Heights, and Fawn Ridge). In addition, the lift station to control Schwanz Lake (Pond LP -32) an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut- ting Schwanz Lake. The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support- ing residential homes. which is pumped ultimately to Pond LP -61 has been turned off because of the standpoint and can best be carried out as one contract. The project slightly modifies the 1984 present lack of storage in Pond LP -61. !•_s a result, Schwanz Lake hasrisento an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut- ting Schwanz Lake. The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support- ing residential homes. would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve, maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There- fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in - Page 1. 5153d 6-2,- FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and can best be carried out as one contract. The project slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This Comprehensive Plan would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve, maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There- fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in - Page 1. 5153d 6-2,- corporate any portion of their internal storm water management into our trunk system at some future time provided it pays its trunk area trunk sewer assess- ment for that area which would benefit from the City's storm sewer system. However, because this storm sewer project will not be designed for excess ca- pacity to include future Dakota County Park drainage, it would only be permit- ted to drain into the storm sewer system during off peak dry periods when the City's storm sewer system is not being utilized for its own needs. Revision from the Comprehensive Plan therefore include the following: 1) The gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond LP -34 will be directed to Pond LP -46 instead of Pond LP -35. 2) Ponds LP -35 and LP -36 will not have the availability of a gravity outlet 0 due to elevation constraints. Therefore, the outlet for this area re- quires a lift station and force main located in the northwest corner of Pond LP -36 discharging into the gravity line between Pond LP -46 to LP -37 which is proposed as an alternate to this feasibility report. 3) The gravity storm sewer from Pond LP -46 will be directed to Pond LP -37 in lieu of the proposed east -west storm sewer along Cliff Road. 4) Dakota County Park runoff is not included in the capacity designs of City of Eagan storm sewer system. 0 DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer in the Holland Lake area. It is proposed to construct a gravity storm sewer from Pond LP -34 (located immediately south of Pond LP -61) to Pond LP -46 through Lakewood Hills Addition as shown on the attached drawing. A short gravity line will also be constructed to the north from Pond LP -34 to Pond LP -61 to control the elevation and storage within Pond LP -61. It is also pro- posed that a gravity storm sewer line be constructed from Pond LP -46 to Pond LP -37 to Pond LP -51 as shown on the attached drawing, 5153d Page 2. �3 Pond LP -51 will be controlled by a lift station pumping through a force main constructed westerly along Cliff Road discharging into a gravity storm sewer at Ches Mar Drive. The gravity storm sewer from Che.s Mar Drive will then be constructed westerly along Cliff Road and discharge into the existing storm sewer located within the ravine in the well site area. It is further proposed to complete the storm sewer within the well site as shown on the at- tached drawing. This includes constructing a gravity storm sewer within the westerly ravine extended southerly to.the existing 60" diameter culvert under Cliff Road near Pilot Knob Road. ® Included in Table A is a listing of those ponds which are proposed to have outlets constructed as part of this project and the specific design considera- tions regarding each pond. As noted in this Table, 3 ponds are protected wet- lands controlled by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Therefore, a permit will be required from the DNR prior to constructing the outlet for these ponds. An alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm sewer outlet for Pond LP -36. The gravity outlet for Pond LP -46 to LP -37 will ® be constructed adjacent to Pond LP -36 at an elevation of approximately 879. However, the normal water elevation as proposed in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for Pond LP -36 is 862.0. Therefore, a small lift station and force main is required which will discharge into the gravity storm sewer between Pond LP -46 and LP -37. Presently, McDonough Lake (Pond LP -45) located in Dakota County Park south of Cliff Road does outlet into the drainage area tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. Therefore, extremely high water elevations have resulted in Pond LP -35 and LP -36. However, because Dakota County Park has indicated they will ultimately contain their own storm water runoff within the park, design considerations for the lift station for Pond LP -36 includes Pi 3. 5153d b�7/" TABLE A POND DATA Page 4. 5153d ® 0 Comp. i Comp. Existing Comp. Comp. Plan Proposed Plan Proposed Pond Level DNR Plan Proposed Plan Proposed Storage Storage Outflow Outflow No. 5/66 NOHW NTATL NWL HWL HVL (Ac -Ft) - (Ac -Ft) (cfs) cfs)- Pond LP -34 885.6 NA 879.0 882.7 888.5 890 20.3 16.7 6.0 5.19 Pond LP -35 872.7 NA 870.5 870.5 880.0 873.0 22.6 2.5 11.1 0.5 Pond LP -36 867.5 NA 862.0 862.0 864.5 864.5 5.5 5.5 0 0.5 Pond LP -37 881.5 879.6 878.3 878.3 880.6 882.8 8.6 18.2 1.0 * 5.97 Pond LP -46 883.3 879.4 879.2 879.2 881.5 884.0 17.8 39.9 1.0 * 5.24 Uk Pond LP -51 867.7 NA 865.0 867 878.5 880 12.8 17.0 6.0 7.0 Pond LP -61 885.3 884.8 884.4 884.4 888.5 890.0 36.4 52.5 6.0 5.19 Page 4. 5153d ® 0 only the drainage area tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. In addition to the lift station and force main construction, a gravity storm sewer draining the low area north of Pond LP -35 to Pond LP -35 and an access road to serve the lift station will be required. EASEMENTS: Easements required for this project are as follows: A.) BASE PROJECT Parcel Permanent Temporary Description Owner (Acre) (Acre) SE 1/4, SECTION 26 LAKEWOOD HILLS South Part Lot 4 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12 Lot 10 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12 Lot 11 Lloyd Wills 0.04 0.16 Lot 13 Gustav Degler 0.07 0.20 Lot 14 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.16 Outlot A Samuel Rockwood 0.01 0.02 WILDERNESS RETREAT Lot 1 (013-00) Samuel Rockwood 0.14 0.35 Lot 5 (055-00) Tom Steinmuller 0.25 1.1 SW 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 010-56 Paul Johnson 0.09 0.25 Parcel 014-55 Linda Jones 0.09 0.25 Parcel 020-53 Albert Carlson 1.0 -- 1.84 2.73 B.) ALTERNATE PROJECT SE 1/4, SECTION 26 LAKEWOOD HILLS Lot 14 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12 Lot 15 (S. 250') Robert Ferguson 0.035 0.10 Lot 15 (N. 250') Helen Undis 0.035 0.10 WILDERNESS RETREAT Part of Lot 5 (051-00) Sally Beauchemin 0.10 0.22 0_20 0.52 Assuming a cost of $7,000/acre for permanent easement and $2„000/acre for temporary easement, it is estimated the total cost for easement acquisition is $18,340 for the base project while for the alternate is $2,060. Page 5. 5153d M AREA TO BE INCLUDED: SWC SECTION 25 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 014-51 SES SECTION .26 Parcel 018-75 Parcel 019-75 Parcel 020-75 Parcel 021-75 Parcel 022-75 Parcel 021-77 Parcel 030-77 ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA SA SECTION 26 WILDERNESS RETREAT Parcel 010-51 Lot 1 (013-00) Parcel 020-51 Part Lot 5 (055-00) Parcel 011-52 Part Lot 5 (052-00) Parcel 010-53 Part Lot 5 (051-00) Parcel 020-53 Parcel 010-54 LAKEWOOD HILLS Parcel 013-55 Lot 1-20 Parcel 014-55 Parcel 010-56 OAK POND HILLS Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 Lots 1 & 2, Block 2 OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION Lot 1-4, Block 1 Lot 1-2, Block 2 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost for the base proj- ect is $763,850 while the alternate, if included, is an additional $72,450. Each of these cost estimates includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, adminis- tration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess- ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef- fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The Page 6. 5153d 47 I* interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as- sessments. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed as part of the base project and the alternate project. In the event the alternate project is not approved, those properties proposed to be assessed as part of the alternate will not be assessed. All property located north of Cliff Road is either existing residential or poten- tial future residential property. Therefore, these areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. As previously indicated, Dakota County Park is not included as part of this project. However, in the future if they elect to be included they would be assessed for that area which would benefit from the Eagan storm sewer sys- tem. The area to be assessed would be assessed in accordance with the City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer to regional parks. TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are ® as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Homesteaded Large Lots Page 7. 5153d 4f $0.050/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft. of each acre) REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer Easement Project Cost Base Alternate $763,850 $72,450 18,340 2,060 Revenue Balance Base Alternate Base Alternate Trunk Area Assmts. $172,525 $212213 TOTAL $782,190 $74,510 $172,525 $21,213 -$609,665 -$53,297 It is anticipated -$609,665 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund for the base project while the alternate project is is estimated $53,297 will be required. It should be noted, however, if Dakota County Park elects to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system sometime in the future, t their assessment would be used to help defer the deficit presented herein. In addition, it should be noted many of the new developments upstream have previ- ously been assessed for trunk area storm sewer for future trunk improvements j such as this project. Therefore, those surplus assessments will be used to offset the deficit presented herein, a PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Acquire Easements Approve plans and Specifications Receive Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 8. 5153d 0 May 20, 1986 June 17, 1986 Summer, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 September, 1986 Spring, 1987 Summer, 1987 May, 1988 5153d APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HOLLAND LAKE AREA 'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS PROJECT NO. 444 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. BASE PROJECT .24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 400 Lin.ft. 94,000 610 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 2,350 Lin.ft. 158,100 100 Lin.ft. Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 550 Lin.ft. 3,600 5,270 Lin.ft. ® 3,000 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 1,200 80 Lin.ft. Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S. 14 Each 1,000 60 Lin.ft. Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton LUMP SUM 4,000 6 Each Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft. 3 Each 1,500 4,400 Cu.yds. Total LUMP SUM 29,100 2 Each +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1 Each $763,850 600 Ton • 400 Cu.yds. 15 Acres 800 Lin.ft. 500 Sq.yds. 9,280 Lin.ft. 5153d APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HOLLAND LAKE AREA 'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS PROJECT NO. 444 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 24,000 .24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 18,300 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft. 94,000 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,400 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 24,200 18" DIP Force main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 158,100 Jack or auger 18" DIP Force main @ $135.00/lin.ft. 10,800 Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 12,600 MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 3,600 Submersible lift sta. (Pond LP -51) @ $170,000/L.S. 170,000 18" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 3,000 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 1,200 Pond excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd. 13,200 Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S. 8,000 Connect 24" RCP to existing MH & RCP @ $500.00/each 1,000 Connect 30" RCP to existing culvert @ $2,000.00/ea. 2,000 Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton 4,200 Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 4,000 Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac. 15,000 Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft. 1,600 Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 1,500 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 9,280 Total $581,980 +5% Contingencies 29,100 $611,080 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 152,770 TOTAL ............................................. $763,850 Page 9. 70 ALTERNATE - POND LP -36 'OUTLET 300 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer @ $32.00/lin.ft. 50 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Force main @ $12.00/lin.ft. 1 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each LUMP SUM Submersible lift station Pond LP -36 @ $30,000.00/L.S. LUMP SUM - Access road @ $10,000.00/L.S. LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. 1.0 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Acre Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL ALTERNATE .................................... Page 10. 5153d $ 9,600 600 1,000 30,000 10,000 3,000 1.000 $55,200 2,760 $57,960 14.490 $72,450 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL HOLLAND LAKE AREA OUTLET PROJECT NO. 444 SA SECTION 26 Parcel 010-51 261,360 Total 193,090 Assessable 9,655 Parcel Future R/W (20%) Area Credit Area Assessment Total 94,500 Description 40,380 (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment Pond (20,000) SW%'SECTION 25 $0.050/s.f. 10,278 Future R'/W (20%) Parcel 014-50 1,584,000 Pond (64,000) 1,216,000 $0.050/s.f. $ 60,800 66,000 $0.050/s.f. 3,300 Future R/W (20%) Parcel 014-51 176,000 Pond (74,000) 102,000 $0.050/s.f. 5,100 SE% SECTION 26 Parcel 018-75 1,050 --- 1,050 $0.050/s.f. 53 Parcel 019-75 2,475 --- 2,475 $0.050/s.f. 124 Parcel 020-75 12,000 --- 12,000 $0.050/s.f. 600 Parcel 021-75 3,600 --- 3,600 $0.050/,s.f. 180 Parcel 022-75 3,400 --- 3,400 $0.050/s.f. 170 Parcel 021-77 123,000 Pond (37,000) 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 1,650 Large Lot Parcel 030-77 52,000 Large Lot 24,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,247 SA SECTION 26 Parcel 010-51 261,360 Pond (20,000) 193,090 $0.050/s.f. 9,655 Future R/W (20%) Parcel 020-51 94,500 Large Lot 40,380 $0.050/s.f. 2,019, Parcel 011-52 276,930 Pond (20,000) 205,550 $0.050/s.f. 10,278 Future R'/W (20%) Parcel 010-53 158,700 Large Lot 66,000 $0.050/s.f. 3,300 Page 11. 5153d 7y S WILDERNESS RETREAT Lot 1, 013-00 Part of Lot 5, 055-00 Part of Lot 5, 051-00 Part of Lot 5, 052-00, LAKEWOOD HILLS Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 8 5153d 234,000 Pond Total 82,500 Assessable Lot Large Parcel Lot Area Credit Area Assessment Total Description 106,840 (sq..ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment Parcel 020-53 133,500 ---- 133,500 $0.050/s.f. 6,675 Parcel 010-54 330,000 Future R/W (20%) 264,000 $0.050/s.f. 13,200 Parcel 013-55 145,200 Pond (56,000) 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 1,650 Large Lot Parcel 014-55 222,750 Pond (72,000) 66,000 $0,.050/s.f. 3,300 Large Lot Parcel 010-56 414,510 Future R/W (20%) 331,610 $0.050/s.f. 16,581 WILDERNESS RETREAT Lot 1, 013-00 Part of Lot 5, 055-00 Part of Lot 5, 051-00 Part of Lot 5, 052-00, LAKEWOOD HILLS Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 8 5153d 234,000 Pond (32,000) 82,500 $0.50/s.f. Lot Large Lot Lot 190,000 384,120 Pond (74,000) 248,090 $0.050/s.f. 106,840 Future R/W (20%) Large 225,000 Pond (78,410) 65,410 $0.050/s.f. Large Large Lot Large Lot 150,000 Pond (7,000) 61,820 $0.050/s.f. Large Lot 64,710 Large Lot 38,100 Large Lot 38,700 Large Lot 190,000 Pond (66,000) Large Lot 106,840 Pond (60,000) Large Lot 102,800 Pond (32,000) Large Lot 23,290 Large Lot 24,760 Large Lot Page 12. 73 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 16,500 $0,:050/s.f. 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 49,500 $0.050/s.f. 19,780 $0.050/s.f. 33,000 $0.050/s.f 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 4,125 AD 12,400 3,271(1) 3,091(1) 1,650 825 825 2,475 989 1,650 825 825 Page 13. 5153d /6 Total Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Assessment Total Description (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment Lot 9 23,580 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825 Lot 10 65,200 Large Lot 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 1,650(1) Lot 11 24,750 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 12 19,200 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 13 34,400 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 14 54,400 Large Lot 27,340 $0.050/s.f. 1,367(1) Lot 15 185,400 Pond (16,000) 66,000 $0.050/s.f. 3,300(1) Large Lot Lot 16 64,350 Pond (37,600) 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Large Lot Lot 17 63,840 Pond (32,800) 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Large Lot Lot 18 54,000 Pond (8,000) 18,940 $0.050/s.f. 947(1) Large Lot Lot 19 30,000 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 20 48,230 Pond (2,500) 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Large Lot OAK POND HILLS Lot 1, Block 1 46,800 Large Lot 19,740 $0.050/s.f. $ 987(1) Lot 2, Block 1 44,000 Large Lot 16,940 $0.050/s.f. 847 Lot 1, Block 2 43,560 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. $ 825(1) Lot 2, Block 2 44,000 Large Lot 16,940 $0.050/s.f. 847 Page 13. 5153d /6 Total Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Assessment Total Description (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 54,000 Large Lot 26,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,347 Lot 2, Block 1 50,000 Large Lot 22,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,147 Lot 3, Block 1 74,000 Large Lot 30,440 $0.050/s.f. 1,522 Lot 4, Block 1 50,000 Large Lot 22,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,147 Lot 1, Block 2 43,650 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825 Lot 2, Block 2 44,000 Large Lot 16,940 $0.050/s.f. 847 TOTAL (BASE PROJECT) ............ $172,525 TOTAL (INCLUDES ALTERNATE 1) ..... $193,738 (1) Total assessment if alternate is approved. 9 • Page 14. 5153d 75, , • HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET LIFT STATION AND FORCERAAIN PROJECT 444 R EAGAN,MJNNESOTA 1 v 80NESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minnesota Date: 5/15/86 Comm. 49355 Fig. No. 1 n 0 co 3 0 3 m z cil m co 1y 0 {w -4 c D 0 a c y O 0 ro m n0 D y m -im mz mm �'m z w 0m_' c "'(D zD N H o z O m r x DAKOTA COUNTY PARK wl)ONOUGN LAKE \ LP -45 0 600 NORTH SCALE IN FEET WD LP -34 4 882,7 w 0 O m m > m 0 m r 191m D r D m m z D m 0 v O m w 0 3 m z Cn m y co c') N chw0Dm 0 P6 -i ER CD O M 0 C NO E�0M 3> o n 0 co m m' >0-im mm mz m. S y m Z oCD _' 0 » m z .> q C7 Z N v m HOLLAND LAKE LP -76 LIFT STATION 81 FORCEMAIN V-69 it POND LP -61 $UDBERRY LN_ `�, erg eee. 6• Ex. OVERLAND FLOW DAKOTA COUNTY PARK 0 600 SCALE IN FEET 12' McDONOUGM LAKE LP -t9 NOR TM POND V rN N« eez.r HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET ASSESSMENT AREA PROJECT 444R EAGAN, MINNESOTA L LE BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minnesota D ate: 5/15/86 Comm. 49355 Fig' No. 3 ®- RIF y I� a z Dc w ' I— J Q I Q = LU r _ o Q z C z w L ' N w U) to Q o O -m r BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK f 8 HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET ASSOCIATES, INC. ASSESSMENT AREA — ALTERNATE Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minnesota PROJECT 444R Date: 5% 15/86 EAGAN,MNNESOTA Comm. 49355 Fig• No.3 ALT. Agenda Information Memo -June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One • • s TAX INCREMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCING PLAN/SPERRY PROJECT A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development District #1 --At the May 21, 1986, City Council meeting a public hearing was held to consider and review the Sperry Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District #1. The amount of the tax increment financing is $700,000..00 which will be used for related public improvements to the Sperry Project. The tax increment financing is structured so that 508 of the new tax increment will be used to pay off the $700,000.00 T.I.F. bonds, while the remaining 508 increment that is generated by the new project will go directly into the tax base so that all taxing jurisdictions will realize the immediate benefit of increased taxes. At the May 21 City Council meeting, final action on the Economic Development District #1 planned and the development program could not be taken due to the statutory requirement to notify both the school district, which is Independent School District 196 and Dakota County, to learn if they had any objections or concerns about the proposed tax increment financing. There has been no correspondence or communication from either jurisdictions since the letters and documents were sent out in mid-May. Therefore action to consider both the development program and tax increment financing plan for Economic Development District #1 is in order for consideration. Enclosed is a copy of the plan and program that was presented as a part of the May 21 City Council packet. Also enclosed is a copy of a development agreement, but the City Administrator suggest it be drafted by both Council and the City Attorney's Office_ This development agreement provides additional protection to the City of Eagan and provides clarification on the City's commitment and how funds will be disbursed as a part of the tax increment financing program. A copy of that agreement is Z3I.Tenclosed on pages0'/ through 4Z3_1- There here has been a great deal of news on the Sperry/Burroughs merger, and if members of the City Council have any specific questions regarding the recent acquisition of the Sperry Corporation by Burroughs, Mr. Ed Michaud will be present at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. There was also an article that appeared this F/ Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two past week in the Minneapolis paper suggesting that the semiconductor plant may be sold. According to Mr. Michaud "to his knowledge Sperry Corporation is not considering the sale of the semi -conductor facility; however, due to the competition in the world of semi -conductors, they are looking for a partner to enhance their high technology research capabilities to remain competitive in the industry". He also indicated that with the recent merger of Burroughs there is even a stronger desire to maintain the semi -conductor facility at its present location and possibly utilize semi -conductor technology that the Burroughs Corporation can offer. Grading has been continuing along on the site for the Sales and Marketing facility and according to Mr. Michaud steel for the building was ordered this past week allowing the project to continue on schedule. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax increment financing development program and plan for the Economic Development District #1 or the Sperry Sales and Marketing facility. • CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA Tax Increment Financing Plan Economic Development District #1 May 6, 1986 r TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 BACKGROUND ................................................ 1 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ....................................... 1 Objectives ........................................... 1 Project Description .................................. 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 2 Statutory Authorization .............................. 2 ® Basis for Findings ................................... 3 District Certification and Duration of Tax Increment Financing District ....................... 3 Prior Planned Improvements ........................... 4 Original Assessed Value ............................... 4 Bonded Indebtedness .................................. 4 Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment .. 4 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds 5 ;. Uses of Tax Increment ......... Additional Financings ................................ 5 Fiscal Disparities ................................... 6 Impact on Other Taxing. Jurisdictions ................. 6 EXHIBIT A - Development Program for Economic Development • District No. 1 .................................. A-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT No. 1 CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION This Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the City of Eagan, Minnesota (the "City") under the requirements of the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act (the "Act"), Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78. The City herein proposes and describes the establishment of a Tax Incre- ment Financing District within the coterminous Economic Develop- ment District No. 1, for purposes of financing public improve- ments required to support a major private -sector development, consisting of a proposal by Sperry Corporation to construct and operate a 295,000 square foot office and computer center and related facilities (the "Improvements"). BACKGROUND The City Council has called for a public hearing on the "3 formation of both Economic Development District No. 1 and the Tax Increment Financing District, for May 21, 1986. On June 17, 1986, subject to public input, the Council will consider both the Development Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Economic Development District No. 1 is being established as a Development District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. A copy of the proposed Development Program for Economic Development District No. 1 and a legal description of the District are attached as an Exhibit to this Plan and are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this Plan. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Objectives The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in establishing Economic Development District No. 1 are as follows: 1. To promote and secure the prompt development of a major office and technology facility contributing to the tax base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. To reduce the cost of manner permitting the completion economic basis. development of property in a of a facility on an • 3. To secure the construction and provide monies for the payment of the costs of public improvements in and adjacent to the District, which are necessary for the orderly and complete development of the District in a manner which will promote the attractiveness of the area and promote public safety. 4. To promote economic development which will add to the employment opportunities in the community, and add to the tax base of the community by increasing taxable values and increasing the need for commercial development. Project Description The actions expected to be taken by the City within the Economic Development District No. 1 include: acquisition and in- stallation of traffic signals, construction of new bicycle paths, construction of new utility laterals (including water, sanitary and storm sewers) and other project improvements consistent with the objectives of the Development Program. Further details of the specific public actions are included in the Development Program of the Project, appended to this Plan. No land will be acquired by the City in connection wi'-h the Development Program. No contracts have been entered into at this time in connection C"I with any such development activities. Anticipated private developments within Economic Development District No. 1 include the construction and operation of a 295,000 square foot office and computer center by Sperry Corporation, the owners of the property within the District. It is expected that construction on this Development will commence in the summer of 1986, and be completed at the end of 1987, and ® have a final estimated market value of approximately $15,100,000. Further details of this project are included in the Development Program of the Project, appended to this Plan. TAY INCREMENT FINANCING Statutory Authorization Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the City is authorized to create the Tax Increment Financing District coterminous with Economic Development District No. 1, to issue the Bonds to finance public improvements within the Project for the purpose of stimulating private development and to utilize tax increments captured from the Tax Increment Financing District due to new private development to meet debt service obligations on these Bonds. Basis for Findinas The City has established the following facts: a) The parcel of land within the District (as identi- fied in Exhibit A) is owned by Sperry Corporation. With the inducement provided by the Development Program and the offer of a,$1 million low-interest loan by the State of Minnesota, Sperry Corporation is expected to construct the Development. The Development is expected to have a value of approximately $15,100,000 and have approximately 700 employees. The Tax Increment Financing District therefore qualifies as an "Economic Development" district under Statutes 273.73, Subdivision 12. b) The Development Program for Economic Development • District No. 1, and this Plan, have been reviewed by the Planning Commission of the City, and found to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. c) The opportunity and feasibility for development of Economic Development District No. 1 by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources other than the $1 million low-interest loan offered by the State of Minnesota and the necessity of the improve- ments to be constructed as an inducement to the Development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within Economic Development District No. 1. d) Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3, of the • Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities requirements (Chapter 473F) will be applied against commercial/industrial properties within the Tax Increment Financing District. District Certification and Duration of Tax Increment Financing District The City expects to request a certification of this District in 1986, following a scheduled public hearing on May 21, 1986, and following a thirty -day review period by Dakota County and affected school districts. As an Economic Development Tax Increment Financing District, the maximum life of the District is the lesser of (i) eight years from the date of collection of the first increment, ;`' which is expected to be July, 1988, or (ii) 10 years from the 0— date of approval of this Tax Increment Financing Plan, which is expected to be June 17, 1986. The City retains the option of terminating the District upon the redemption of the Bonds. Prior Planned Improvements No building permits have been issued by the City for any parcels within the Tax Increment Financing District, in the first fifteen months of the eighteen month time period preceding the expected date of approval of the Tax Increment Financing District by the City. Original Assessed Value It is anticipated that the District will be approved on June 17, 1986, and that certification will be requested of the Dakota County Auditor soon thereafter. The Original Assessed Value of the District will therefore be the value assessed in 1986 for taxes payable in 1987. The original assessed valuation of the District has not yet been determined because the creation of the District will require identification of a new tax parcel, but it is expected that the original assessed value will not exceed $2 million at any time folloc.ing the adjustments required by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes. Pursuant to Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes, the Original Assessed Value of the District for each of the next 10 years will be required to be adjusted annually by the average percentage increase in the assessed valuation of the property included in the District during the previous five years. Bonded Indebtedness • It is currently anticipated that the City will issue the Bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $700,000. This amount includes enough capitalized interest to meet debt service obligations up to the point that sufficient tax increments are estimated to be generated to meet debt service obligations. Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment Current financial projections for the Tax Increment Financing District, based on assumptions that include an estimated final market value of the Improvements of $15,100,000, an estimated assessed valuation of the Improvements of $6,493,000, a constant mill rate of 102.138 mills, a fiscal disparities contribution ratio of 28.8877%, and the termination of the District in the year 1996, suggest that the total tax increment to be generated by the District will equal at least $400,000, of which $200,.000 will be retained by the City for payment of debt service on the Bonds. Assuming no inflation in property values after the g7 e Improvement's initial assessment, it is estimated that the District will have an annual Captured Assessed Values following completion of the Improvement $6,493,000, less any adjustment required by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes. Estimated Uses of Funds .It is estimated that the proceeds of the Bonds will be expended approximately as follows: Uses: Capitalized interest $ 63,555 Construction Costs for Improvements Traffic Signals $ 55,000 Bike Trail 32,000 Utilities and Other 535,482 622,482 Costs,.of Issuance Bond•Discount 7,000 6,963 $700,000 Uses of Tax Increments Under Section 273.75, Subdivision 4, of the Act, the City will use the tax increments generated from the Captured Assessed Value of the District to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements. Pursuant to Section 273.75, Subdivision 2, of the Act, the City elects to retain 100% of all increments collected, however,, to the extent that receipts of tax increment exceed the debt service require- ments for the bonds to be issued an amount up to 500 of the increments are expected to be returned to the County Auditor for distribution to affected taxing jurisdictions. Notwithstanding the above, the City retains the option, at any time during the life of the District, to retain some portion less than 100% of the annual tax increment, and pass on the remaining portion to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City also retains the option, pursuant to Section 273.74, Subdivision 4, of modifying this Plan to include further expenditures of tax increments for additional public purposes. Additional Financi The City presently anticipates no other additional financing for the District. • Fiscal Disparities Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3 of the Act, the City elects to utilize the method of computing Captured Assessed Value as defined under clause (b). Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Because the proposed Improvements are occurring con- tingent on the City's provision of the improvements contemplated by the Development Program as financed by tax increments, it is determined that this Tax Increment Financing District will have no impact on other taxing jurisdiction during the life of the District. The other jurisdictions will continue to receive property taxes from the District based on the Original Assessed ® Value, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with Section 273.76, Subd. 1 of the Act. At the termination of the District, the other taxing jurisdictions will receive the entire assessed value of the new development as part of their tax base. u DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EAGAN TAX INCREMENT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 A. STATEMENT OF INTENT It is the intent of the City of Eagan to organize a development district and undertake a development program within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A, and to designate the project area as Development District No. 1 (the "District") for purposes of carrying out the improvements hereinafter described and establishing the project area as a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, in the financing of the improvements herein described. In particular, there has been presented to the City a plan for the construction of certain improvements in order to induce the construction of an office and computer center to provide employment opportunities and enhance the tax base of the City. B. STATEMENT OF NEED There is a need for new development in the City to provide employment opportunities, to increase the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state and the City. This need can be accomplished through the attraction of commercial and industrial development. In the case of the District, significant development can be attracted by the Program described herein. The action herein proposed to be taken by the City is found to have,a public purpose in accordance with Chapter 472A, Minnesota Statutes, and is necessary to meet those needs. C. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT AND TO The City has power to establish a tax increment financing district under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, and to undertake development programs as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. The City has authority under Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.03 to acquire, construct, recon- struct, improve, alter, extend, operate, maintain or promote developments aimed at improving the physical facilities, quality of life and quality of transportation. D. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in establishing its Development District No. 1 and in carrying out the Development Program for the District are as follows: E 1. To promote and secure,the prompt development of a major office and computer facility contributing to the tax base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. To reduce the cost of development of property in a manner permitting the completion of the facility on an economic basis. 3. To provide monies for the payment of the costs of improvements in and adjacent to the District, which are necessary for the orderly and complete development of the District and which will provide public safety. E. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITIES ® The objectives of this development district will be accomplished through the following actions by the City: 1. Purchase and install traffic signals at the intersection of Towerview Road and Pilot Knob Road and at the future main entrance intersection opposite Jurdy Road on Pilot Knob Road. 2. Construct bicycle trail improvement from Quarry Hill Park to Pilot Knob Park through the District. 3. New installation of utilities, including water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer. 4. Other project improvements within the Development • District which are consistent with the objectives of the Development Program, including fire loop, street, street lighting and site improvements. Sperry Corporation is expected to construct a 250,000 square foot office and computer facility in the northeast portion of the District. This facility is expected to employ approximately and to have a market value upon completion of approximately $15,100,000. F. LAND USE All development on lands in Economic Development District No. 1 will be subject to the following uses and requirements. 1. Permitted Uses Development District No. 1 is designated as Research and Development on the adopted Comprehensive Plan, and any IF/ A-2 permitted use in such areas as defined by the Eagan Compre- hensive Plan will be permitted, provided the use does not have a significant adverse effect on surrounding uses in terms of noise, traffic generation, congestion and appearance as determined by the City. The "Research and Development" classification provides special standards which promote compatibility with adjacent residential uses. 2. Additional Regulations and Controls or Restrictions to be Imposed. a. All new development shall conform to the applicable State and local codes and ordinances. G. DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Site Design Conformance with the Eagan Zoning Ordinance set forth in the Eagan City Code must be complied with reference to all site preparation, construction of buildings, parking areas, etc., landscaping and all other provisions thereof. 2. Required Documents The Public Works Director of the City of Eagan shall be provided with all documents that he may require including, but not limited to site plan, grading and storm drainage plans, utility and lighting plan and all otherhe deems necessary to determine the conformance of the proposed development with the design standards. 3. Comprehensive Plan The objectives of the City of Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan shall be adhered to in order to control the uses of the property, including economic viability, environmental impact, community facilities, parks and open space and transportation. H. LAND ACQUISITION No properties to be acquired by the City in connection with the Development Program. I. RELOCATION OF.DISPLACED PERSONS There is no relocation contemplated in Development District No. 1. J. MAINTENANCE OF PROJECT AREA The City Administrator shall be responsible for the administration of Development District No. 1 on behalf of the City of Eagan. K. GEOGRAPHIC MODIFICATION In accordance with M.S.A. 273.74, Subd. 4, the geo- graphic area of the District may be reduced but may not be enlarged after five (5) years following the date of the designation of the District. This District may, therefore, be expanded until 1991. Geographic modification shall be in accordance with M.S.A. 273.74. ® L. ATTACHMENTS There are attached hereto for further elucidation and description, the following maps and drawings: D E V E L O P M E N T A G R E E M E N T CITY OF EAGAN and SPERRY CORPORATION DATED: PARTIES: The CITY OF EAGAN, Dakota County, Minnesota, called "the City", and SPERRY CORPORATION, called "Sperry". RECITALS: 40 1. The City has formed an economic development district pursuant to Chapter 472A, Minnesota Statutes, and a tax increment financing district pursuant to Sections 273.71 to 273.78, Minnesota Statutes, known as Economic Development District No. 1, consisting of the property owned by Sperry described in Exhibit "A" hereto (the "District"). 2. The City has approved an economic Development Program for the District under which it proposes to undertake the public improvements described therein and in paragraph 1 hereof (the "Public Improvements"). 3. In consideration of the Development Program, Sperry intends to construct an approximately 295,000 square foot office and computer center and related facilities in the District (the "Private Development"). 4. The City intends to finance the economic Development Program with the issuance of $700,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1986 (the "Bonds"), which are intended to be repaid primarily from the proceeds of tax increments from the District. (��3A I COVENANTS: In consideration of the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, the City and Sperry hereby agree as follows: 1. Public Improvements. Subject to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 hereof, the City shall- acquire and construct the following Public Improvements in the District: a. Internal access roads b. Internal storm drainage ® C. Internal water distribution and fire loop system including. hydrants and valves a. Internal sanitary sewer collection systems e. Semaphore traffic signals at Pilot Knob Road/Tower View Road f. Internal bicycle/pedestrian trail 2. A Public Improvement Project. Except for the semaphore traffic signals, and bicycle/pedestrian trail, which shall be designed, constructed ® and installed to the City's specifications, Sperry shall furnish plans and specifications and contract documents for the Public Improvements to the City. If such plans and specifications and contract documents are acceptable to the City, the City shall advertise for bids and award contracts for the work in accordance with.any applicable public bidding requirements. The work on the Public Improvements shall commence and proceed at such times and in such manner as shall be necessary, in the judgment of Sperry, to permit completion of the Private Development in an expeditious manner. Sperry or any contractor employed by Sperry shall be eligible to submit a bid for such Public Improvements. /vB 2 3. Supervision by Sperry. Any contract shall provide that the contractor is subject to the direction of Sperry or its agents in the performance of the work. In the event the work is defective or in the event of default by any contractor, the City shall, at the reasonable request and expense of Sperry, pursue any remedies available under the contracts for the benefit of Sperry which costs shall be paid by Sperry. Sperry shall provide access to its property in the District to permit construction of the Public Improvements. The terms of such access may be part of the plans and specifications. 4. Limit of City Responsibility. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the City shall have no obligation to pay more than the aggregate amount for the Public Improvements. It is understood that the tax increment bonds provided under paragraph 5 shall cover the aggregate total of all issuance costs, bona discount costs, capitalized interest, semaphore installation and trail improvements which total amounts may not be determined for a substantial time following the issuance of the bonds. Sperry hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for all expenditures and liabilities of the City in connection with the Public Improvements in excess of $700-,000.00 less the future costs for the semaphore and trail installation and all City issuance expenses. 5. Issuance of Bonds. The City's obligation under paragraph 2 is also subject to the ability of the City to issue $700,000 of general obligation tax increment bonds to provide funds for the Development Program. The City shall use its best efforts to issue such bonds prior to August 15, 1986. 6. Failure to Complete. Sperry agrees to construct the Private Development substantially in accordance with the scale and scope of the Private Developments as described in preliminary designs furnished to the 93� 3 • • City. In the event Sperry fails to complete such Private Developments by 19_, Sperry shall reimburse the City for amounts expended by the City on the Public Improvements, related City costs and interest expenses on the Bonds which the City does not recover from earnings on investments and tax increment from the District. 7. Design Charges. It is understood that the cost of preparing the plans and specifications for the public improvements including the future semaphores and park trail improvements shall/shall not be included in the finances proposed under this Agreement. . 8. Schedule. Projected schedule for the Public Improvements is as follows: City Council Approval of Plans and Advertise for bids May 21, 1986 Opening of bids June 13, 1986 Award of Contract by City Council June 17, 1986 Substantial Completion Nov. 15, 1986 Final Completion June 1, 1987 9. Termination. In the event that the Private Development is terminated for any reason prior to or during the course of construction of the Public Improvement project or the construction of the office and computer facility then Sperry shall pay the City upon the request of the City for all costs incurred by the City including the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds and all costs involved in the design and construction of the public improvements and administrative, engineering, legal and all other costs incurred by the City in relation thereto. 10. Approvals. It is understood that Sperry or its designated representatives shall mutually approve all payment requests and/or changes for the Public Improvements intended to be installed according to this agreement. (73,D 4 11. Hold Harmless. Except for the duties and responsibilities of the City involved in the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds, and the responsibilities of the City specified under this Agreement for Public Improvements, the City shall have no further responsibility for acquisition of and compliance with permits required ,under paragraph 13, or the design, construction and inspection of the Public Improvements or the Private Development and Sperry, its successors and assigns shall hold the City, its agents and representatives harmless from any and all claims or causes of action which may result from the construction of the public improvements and the private development contemplated under this agreement. 12. Completion of Project. At such time as all the Public Improvements and the Private Development contemplated under this Agreement are completed, the City will assign all of its right, title and interest in such improvements to Sperry and the City shall then have no further responsibility under this agreement. 13. Permits and Licenses. Sperry shall acquire all necessary permits, licenses and approvals for the construction and development of the office and computer center and related facilities contemplated under this Agreement whether from the State of Minnesota, City of Eagan or any other applicable public agency. 14. Waiver of Objections. Sperry hereby waives notice of any and all hearings required and waives any and all objections and appeals pursuant to M.S.A. 9 429. 15. Recording. The undersigned hereby agree that this Agreement may be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder and that the parties shall execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording of this Agreement including the delivery of the owners duplicate certificate of title to the affected lands if necessary. 5 16. Successors and Assigns. The undersigned hereby agree that this Agreement shall run with the affected land described in Exhibit "A". and bind the heirs, successors and assigns of such land until terminated by written agreement of the parties hereto. 17. Affected Parties. The undersigned include all the persons, firms or corporations that hold an interest in or are involved in this Agreement and the undersigned officials are authorized to sign this Agreement and to bind the respective parties. ® 18. Copy of the Agreement. Each of the parties heretohas read this Agreement and has received acopy thereof and agrees to execute any and all documents necessary to implement the terms of this Agreement. 19. Notices. Notices required or authorized to be given hereunder, until written notice of change of offices or addresses is given to all parties concerned, shall begivenas follows: City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Sperry Corporation 20. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by written agreement of the parties. 21. Remedies of the Parties.. The terms of this Agreement shall be legally enforceable by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction andeach of the parties retains the right to assert any legal, equitable, or administrative right of action or defense which may be available by law in order to implement or enforce the terms of this Agreement. gi3F IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement, consisting of eight (8) pages, including the following page, to be executed by the signature of their duly authorized officers, as of the date first written above. CITY OF EAGAN (Date: By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Approved as to Form: Eagan City Attorney (Date: ) Approved as to Content: Director of Public Works (Date: ) Approved as to Content: City Administrator (Dated: ) THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Hauge, Eide n Keller, P. A. Attorneys for the City of Eagan 1200 Yankee Doodle Road Water View Office Tower, Suite 303 Eagan, MN 55123 (612) 456-9000 7 SPERRY CORPORATION By: / ®. Date Its: By: / Date Its By: / Date Its: And: / Date �• Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared BEATTA BLOMQUIST and E. J. VanOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the CITY OF EAGAN, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA) as. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public within ana for said County personally appeared ana to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn that they are respectively the ana of the Corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said • corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation. (S E A L) 93f� SPERRY PARK all auu � rta. �1� r 1 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70 B The Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/ Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986 City Council meeting authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action continued the license to allow for a public hearing.and potential amendmend to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm five (5) off -sale liquor license or remove the ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor license to be granted within the communi- ty. If action is taken under Item A public hearing to remove the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications this license can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the five (5) then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing the off -sale liquor license maximum from four to five as acted upon by the City Council at the May 6 meeting. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the application and police officer's report that were included with the May 21 packet. e�Z ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor- license for Curtis O. Johnson for location of the Town Centre/Eagan.Shopping Center. e�Z Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION CUL DE SAC RECONSIDERATION C. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition -Cul de ,Sac Reconsideration -- At the May 20 Council meeting, the Council considered a request from the Opus Corporation regarding the requirement to eliminate the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac from the proposed Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition. This item was continued until the June 17 meeting to allow proper representation and background justification for this request. Enclosed on pages �24 and is a letter justifying this request. Enclosed on pages and are the two configurations of the proposed final plat„ with nd without the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac. Enclosed on page -,� is a copy of the minutes from the December 3 Council meeting, where the original discussion took place that resulted in the cul de sac being eliminated as a condition of final plat approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the de- veloper's request to plat a public right-of-way cul de sac, servic- ing Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition. I OPUS CORPORATION DESIGNERS 4 BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS ' 1 ii3g June 11, 1986 Mr. Tom Colbert Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Trapp Road Cul -de -Sac Dear Mr. Colbert: Reference is made to your letter of May 30, 1986 requesting more background information in support of our proposed cul-de-sac off of • Trapp Road which the Council voted to eliminate from our plat of Eagandale Park 3rd Addition a few weeks ago. We, at Opus, understand the Council's position on construction of new cul -de -.sacs within the city of Eagan. However, we feel an exception to this position should be considered in relation to this proposed cul-de-sac which is designed to service the cluster of offices proposed for the northwest corner of Eagandale Business Center. The State Highway Department's requirements for additional right-of-way from the northerly lots of the Business Center for extension of I-494 made it necessary to realign Trapp Road east of Pilot Knob and reconfigure the lots it was originally designed to service. In addition, when the new interchange for 35E and I-494 was constructed, our old direct front door Highway 55 access was significantly altered. To compensate for these highway related changes, we relocated our ® entrance for the Business Center to Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive. To enhance this new entrance into the Center for customers and owners, we reconfigured the alignment of Corporate Center Drive, resized and configured the old lots into new accessible parcels and created a master development plan that would place our highest image buildings (offices and hotel) at this new entrance to the Center. Our intent was to create a new sense of place and identity for the new businesses locating in the vacinity of Pilot Knob, Trapp Road and Corporate Center Drive. The use of a common drive, exciting architecture and landscaping helps achieve these ,objectives. That is why the "Trapp Court" cul-de-sac was and is being proposed for the area as shown on the plat of Eagandale 3rd Addition. We used this concept of high visibility and convenient public access from Pilot Knob and Trapp Road to sell Sperry on the site that they are currently developing. It should also be pointed Out that this is the only cul-de-sac that is being proposed for all of the undeveloped property in this northwest section of the Business Center. Given the design and land development objectives that we are currently fulfilling in this area of the Center, we feel the cul-de-sac should be approved. Please call if you have questions Z would hope that the explanation OPUS AND AFFILIATES IN MINNEAPOLIS • CHICAGO -PHOENIX. MILWAUKEE -TAMPA - PENSACOLA EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 800 OPUS CENTER 49900 BREN ROAD EAST 4 PO BOX 150-MINN EAPOL IS. MINNESOTA 55440 (612)936-4444 I Mr. Tom Colbert June 11, 1986 Page 2 given herein to justify the Trapp Court cul—de—sac is sufficient to warrant your support at the June 17 Council Meeting. Bees�t" Regards, Robert A. Worthington, AICP Executive Director — Governmental Affairs RAW: jo cc: Tom Davis Tom Hedges 97 OPUS CORPORATION /JY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION 41`% f-trr_ T • r� • � LOT 9 �J � y.ru- -: ✓. / 1 :.i Council Minutes December 3, 1985 YORKTON I S YORRTON II - IR FINANCING The final resolutions for the proposed industrial revenue bond issues for Yorkton I and Yorkton II'vere submitted and the applicant requested approval. Mike Gresser appeared for the applicant and Tom Hedges indicated that the City has not received a letter from bond counsel satisfying the City staff's concerns that the bonds could become taxable due to the procedural variance required for the application. In addition, the final documents for the bond project had not been received for review by the City Administrator or City Attorney. After discussion, Egan moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the final resolutions for the two bona issues, each in the sum of $600,000.00, subject however, to submission and approval by the City staff of. the bond counsel letter described above, and approval of the final transcript for the bond issues. All voted yes. EAGANDAIM INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The application for preliminary plat approval of Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition consisting of a replat of Eagandale Industrial Park Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, came to the Council. The APC recommended approval at its November 26, 1985 meeting, subject to certain conditions. The plat would combine four existing lots and three new lots, north of Corporate Center Drive *_ and west of Trapp Road, according to Dale Runkle. There was considerable:` discussion concerning the cul-de-sac proposed to be converted to a private cross easement built to City standards. Gerald Sunde of Sunde Engineering was present and recommended that the cul-de-sac remain a public street. After review, Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the preliminary plat application for Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed public cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and a private street be provided for access to the lots. 2. The owner and developer will be responsible for any damage to any retaining wall and grading damages as a result of necessary maintenance of the City's storm and sanitary sewer lines within the sanitary and storm sewer easement along the southwesterly boundary of the property. 3. The watermain that the developer proposes to construct shall be built in accordance .with City specifications and properly verified that the contractor adhered to City standards. 4. This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary MWCC connection permits. .5. The cul-de-sac, Trapp Court, shall be constructed in accordance with City standards for a tear drop design and 9 ton standards. 6. This development shall dedicate a 20 foot utility and drainage easement adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way. /610 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN REGULATIONS D. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign Regulations --At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the City staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections of city collector and/or county roads. The policy was presented at the April 1, 1986 City Council meeting for review and considera- tion. For a copy of a memo of direction by the City Administrator and a study completed by the Sign Inspector and Chief Building Inspector, refer to pages /07/ through j�. Following review and consideration of the temporary advertising signs policy, Councilmember Ellison suggested "that one sign be permitted at each intersection which would include several developers and one standard with each developer potentially being able to place a sign on more then one standard . After discussion, Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the policy with the request that staff review the proposal and prepare and submit guidelines regarding locations, sizes, costs, color priorities and users to the City Council for later consideration. All voted yea." Following the motion, specific direction was given to the City Administrator which is outlined in the attached memo enclosed on pages /6-5, through L� to the Chief Building Inspector. Mr. Borgschatz has responded to the April 4 memo;, and for a copy of his findings, refer to pages /D through ® The cost projected for a steel sign seems high, however, individual signs that are being purchased and placed by developers throughout the community at various intersections are expensive and in some cases might compete with the cost for one reader board. There are many considerations, such as 1) The City monitoring the program as outlined by our Sign Inspector, 2) to adopt by ordinance a temporary advertising sign and then submit a request for proposal and allow various sign companies to bid on the reader board and manage the same for the City of Eagan. In other words, a developer would contact the sign company directly and buy time on the reader board at the quote presented to the City. 3) Developers will be restricted with the information that can be placed on a reader board, eliminating use of their logo and other marketing informa- tion. 4) Steel signs are certainly more expensive then signs but require much less maintenance. The City could erect the reader board signs during winter months, therefore providing both the management and construction/installation service. Reader boards at strategic locations, throughout the City would eliminate numerous temporary advertising signs. that are being placed by developers and builders. Additional philosophy should be considered regarding 1) the amount of regulatory control the /D / Agenda Information Memo June 17, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six TEMP ADVERTISING SIGNS CONT'D City desires to place on builders and developers advertising their business within the City. 2) If additional regulatory control is desired, whether the City or private sector should manage the installation of the signs. Because of the investment certain developers and builders have made in temporary advertising signs,, any change in policy might require either a sunset or grandfather provision, to slowly eliminate those signs that are currently in existence while freezing any replacement of new temporary advertising signs. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To discuss and provide addi- tional direction as to whether the City wishes to amend its Sign Ordinance by regulating the use of reader boards for any and all temporary advertising signs throughout the City. /0/R MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986 SUBJECT: NEW POLICY FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION AND LOCATION OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at their regular meeting held on Tuesday, January 7, 1986, staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections of City collector and/or County roads. The City Council commends your department on the excellent work that Elmer Borgschatz and you have performed in tightening up and carrying out regulatory provisions set for the location of signs throughout the City. In a discussion at the meeting, it is the desire of the City Council to develop additional policy that will further tighten up the location of temporary ® advertising signs throughout the City. First, the City Council would like an inventory of signs that are located on major City collector roads such as Blackhawk and all County roads throughout the City. This inventory or list of existing signs would include the duration (what amount of time is remaining of the two-year, temporary status) and the quality of the existing sign. Secondly, the City Council is asking that the policy for consider- ation include several of the following points: 1) temporary advertising signs must be placed in a specific location not to block any sight distance or view for the motorist; 2) consider- ation should be given to the adoption of criteria that would establish a distance between temporary advertising signs (much the same as general advertising) for aesthetic purposes; 3) a require- ment would exist that all adjacent property owners must be notified and provide consent for the placement of a temporary advertising sign; 4) the size and type of structure for a temporary advertising sign should again be reviewed; 5) consideration should be given to criteria that would establish a maintenance provision allowing City staff to require certain on-going maintenance of a temporary advertising sign; and 6) other conditions that might be suitable for a new temporary sign policy. The City Council would like the inventory completed and a policy to review by the first meeting in March. With the amount of growth that is occurring, we anticipate the request for many more temporary advertising signs; therefore, there is some urgency in preparing a new policy for City Council consideration. City Administrator TLH/kf �6y Agenda Information Memo April 1, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven REVIEW CURRENT POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS B. Review of Current Policy for Temporary Advertising Signs --The City staff was directed, at a recent City Council meeting, to inventory all temporary advertising signs on major collector roads throughout the city. Further action taken at the January 7, 1986, City Council meeting directed the City staff to prepare options for revisions to the sign ordinance and sign policy concerning advertis- ing directional signs. Procedure requiring acceptable maintenance conditions has been established by the Protective Inspections Department along with an inventory that was completed and copied to each member of the City Council during early March. There are many regulatory alternatives to review, however, the three (3) options listed in the Chief Building Official's Report were as follows: Option 1. Leave the City Code 4.20 subdivision 1C9 and allow the City Council to grant special permits using the criteria of City 4.20 subdivisions 2 & 3 which establish setbacks and standards. Option 2: Limit temporary signs to a one-year maxi -mum time span, limited to Eagan developments only, area limitation of 24 sq.feet, limit top edge of sign at • 9 feet above street level, limit bottom edge of sign to 6 feet above s.ze�' level, a limit of two (2) signs per intersection corner, and a minimum of 50 feet separation between signs. Option 3: An immediate moratorium on all temporary advertising signs and phase out existing signs as permits expire. Enclosed on page�. is a copy of the sign survey of 31 inter- sections in EaganIf any member of the City Council has misplaced the specific sign locations, an additional copy can be made avail- able. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or suggest a regulatory change for the control and issuance of temporary adver- tising signs. SIGN SURVEY OF THIRTY ONE INTERSECTIONS IN EAGAN Hwy 149 -& Lone Oak Rd -- No sign Hwy 149 -& Yankee Doodle - 1 sign ( 3 sised, in sw corner Dodd Rd -& Diffley - 2 " ( SW corner ) Hwy 3 -& Diffley - 1 " ( SW corner, Homeowners Produce for sale) no permit Cliff Rd-& Hwy 3 - 1 " ( SW corner ) Cliff Rd & Dodd Rd - 2 " ( 1 in NIB, 1 in NE corner) Cliff Rd & Lexington - 2 " ( NE corner ) Cliff Rd & Pilot Knob - 3 " ( NW corner ) Cliff Rd & Thomas Lake - 3 " ( 1 in NE , 2 in NW corner ) Cliff Rd & Safari B H - 2 " ( 1 in NE , 1 in S.E corner ) Cliff Rd & Johnny Cake - 1 " ( SE corner ) ® Cliff Rd & Galaxie - 1 " ( SE corner ) Cliff Rd & Rahn Rd - 3 " ( 3 in NE corner ) Cliff Rd & Nicols - 2 " ( 1 BP in NE corner, 1 BP in SE Corner ) Cliff Rd & Slater - 1 " ( 1 in SW corner Service station sign pending) Cliff Rd & Cinamin Ridge - Q " ( no sign ) Cedar Ridge & Shale - 0 " ( no sign ) Blackhawk &0 �Y 3 - 3 It (3 in SW corner) Diffley & Thomas Lake - 2 It ( 1 in NW , 1 in NE corner ) Diffley & Pilot Knob - 5 " ( 2 in NW, 3 in NE corner ) Beerwood & Pilot Knob - 3 " ( 1 in NE corner , (3 2 in 5E corner Should be remov Diffley & Lexington - 7 " ( 1 in NE corner 6 in SE corner ) Diffley & Trenton - 4 ". (l.in SE corner, on Right/a/way & 3 signs in SW cor Wescott & Lexington - 2 " ( 2 in NW corner ) Yamkee Doodle * Lex. - 5 " ( 1 NW, 1 SW, 3 SE & 1 in NE corner ) Yankee Doodle &Pilot E,nob- 0 " ( 2 pylon signs , Hotel and Super America ) Yankee Doodle & Hwy 13 - 0 " Four Oaks & Hwy 13 - 1 " ( I sign NE corner) Lone Oak & Hwy 13 - 0 " Lone Oak & Pilot Knob - 1 " ( Blackhawk Glen - No permit ) Lone Oak & Lexington - 3 " ( 2 in SE , 1 in NE corner ) Summary 1 intersection, 7 signs 2 If 5 " 1 u 4 u s 6 3 7 " 2 If g u 1 u 6 " 0 Total 31 intersections 1 signs MEMO TO: CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 4, 1986 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY -OWNED/ STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS In official action that was taken by the City Council at their April 1, 1986, meeting, a concept was given consideration whereby the City would construct and install uniform, temporary advertising signs throughout approved locations within the City. These signs would be designed to accommodate several identification signs that would meet a specific specificationand design standard. Please make reference to the example that was prepared by City Council - member Ellison and is attached for your reference. The City Council is concerned about the number of temporary advertising signs that are located at busy intersections throughout the community. I would like you to give consideration to this new concept that was proposed by the City Council and determine the feasibility of the project. Please take into consideration the following: 1. Locations: It would be necessary to determine the loca- tions that are suitable for installing a City -owned stan- dardized sign. 2. Size: Please prepare a set of specifications that would standardize the sign and each reader board/identification sign. 3. Cost: Please estimate the cost for construction and installation of these signs. Also determine which each of the individual reader board/identifications would cost to construct and, further, what. is fair in terms of rental charges by the City. 4. Priority: Please determine a method in which the reader board/identification signs would be rented considering priority of space on the City sign and, further, the duration of time that those identification signs would be allowed. 5. Number of Signs: Please determine how many signs could be placed on one of the overall signs and, further, whether more than one size of sign 'should be given consideration. Please see #2 above. 6. Locations: Currently, a development is allowed two (2) temporary advertising signs in addition to any signs that are allowed on the subject development parcel. It would be necessary to determine the procedure for allowing a location and consideration for the two additional signs a developer might request. 7. Other Criteria: Please give consideration to any other criteria that might be appropriate in considering this project. �Q� It appears that the City Council would like to proceed with this concept for controlling and providing a beautification to temporary advertising signs throughout the. community. It would be necessary to provide some type of transition such as, requiring developers to remove their temporary advertising signs and possibly provide 'a free or reduced rent for the first year to off -set expenses. that they have incurred in the ,construction of their temporary adver- tising sign. Again,please give further assistance tact my office and either through our tants. City Administrator this priority consideration. If you need due to your departmental schedule, please con - I will provide some administrative assistance new intern or one of my Administrative Assis- cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers TLH/kf lQ a 0 <= Pt j4SAFAR►oAKsI HILLTOPPERS Omen IhDMPSDP, LOS 40 a MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM HEDGES . CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIIAL, DALE PETERSON FROM: ELMER A BORGSCHATZ DATE: JUNE 12, 1986 BE: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY OWNED/STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS In reference to memo dated April 4, 1986 we have gathered some information that may be helpful to study a program which could be considered to eliminate a problem relative to a reader board identification. I have been very much impressed by the concept, however there may be some pitfalls as we will allude to when we refer to the seven points set forth in your letter. • 1. LOCATIONS - I would estimate that six reader boards are needed to cover the present activity in the City. The developments are spread into most areas of the City, however it may be difficult to lease six prime spots as the use of right-of-ways would not be advisable. 2. SIZE - The attached sign detail by a reputable advertising company in Eagan meets the recommendation of the. Council, however the all -steel sign cost estimate also attached seems high. 3. COSTS - In accordance with estimates we have for an all steel constructed sign with steel posts, removable (12" x 72" adv. panels) which would include reflectorized panels would cost approximately $5,250 per unit. The land use cost is estimated at $600 per unit. $100 maintenance cost annually may be low. Assuming a ten-year life expectancy of the all -steel sign, the following ® calculations indicate the projected income necessary to provide the service: To meet the annual costs which would be change of script: 3 @ $1,143, depreciation of $525, interest of $525, lease Of site - $600 and $100 for maintenance for a total of $2,893. A monthly rental fee of $33 per panel would be necessary. 4. PRIORITY - It is suggested that the reader board be leased to the applicants who have shown the greatest activity in number of units processed in the preceding six months. 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS - We believe that signs should be uniform for aesthetic values. At the moment, it would seem difficult to locate more than six signs in strategic locations within the City. Six signs filled would allow for 48 users and not knowing the acceptance by the industry, the outlay of approximately $36,000 looks large. 6. LOCATION - It is our contention that location could be found for six good spots. I believe Council and management could be a better judge of the temporary advertising needs, hopefuLly the reader board would eliminate part of the problem. /Q 7. OTHER CRITERIA - Space on the reader board on an annual basis, if renewals are wanted, arrangements and fees should be made 30 days before expiration. Vacancies do not destroy the effect of the board. EB/js • ----- ---1111r=aiiur--_---- FABRICATORS DESIGNERS �Jo June 6, 1986 Mr. Elmer Borgschatz City of Eagan ® 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 • -�,��sri�ence h1c. 945 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE • 488.6711 • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551C RE: Twin post directional signs Dear Elmer: To furnish and install a 161 tall twin post structure with eight double faced directional panels as shown on Drawing #86-R-193, our price to you is $4,737.00. For optional reflective copy, add $512.00. The following is a cost breakdown for your review: Poles Reflective 12" x 7211 D/F panels Non -reflective 1211 x 72" DIF panels Sincerely, LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC. Mike Gifford MG:ds Furnished 700.00 Installed Total 1300.00 2000.00 291.00 90.00 381.00 227.00 90.00 317.00 0 .TOP V IE W o J 1! nflkss ftes 17, AWN. PAVELS AYDSQ. NBf! 0 0�0 CT002 ll lll'lLLi��l5001SC4J L�00 � �OFUGTafBIED Com' _ -- AYV µYD�IL WNIiG ' AA DK. WmN2E' FR6iT ViEw 4W �LLuy. ntiF� PriON D�f / nkee��are �Oe�te� II r•B 1! d d � a Agenda Information Memo June 17,, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MINNESOTA BANK EAGAN A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) for a Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their May 27, 1986 meeting, to consider an application submitted by the Minnesota Bank Eagan for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign located on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition. The APC is recommending approval, subject to condi- tions set forth in the staff report. Enclosed on pages //3 through / is a copy of the Planning Department report as • it pertains to this application. Also enclosed on page(s)//94#7 is a copy of the minutes from the APC meeting concerning this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign along Yankee Doodle Road in the Bicentennial Addition. �/L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PYLON SIGN APPLICANT: MN BANK EAGAN LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: NB (UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a pylon sign located on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition. COMMENTS: In the initial review, the Planning Department has determined that a Variance as well as a Conditional Use Permit would be required in order to allow a pylon sign for Minnesota Bank Eagan. Presently, there exists only 127' to the existing standard pylon sign and approximately 225' to the existing Super America sign. Therefore, any location elected for construction of this sign on the Minnesota Bank Eagan site would be in violation of the spacing requirement of the sign ordinance. Minnesota Bank Eagan has come to the City because of the location and visibility of the bank from Yankee Doodle Road. Representatives of the bank feel a pylon sign would give much more visibility. ® They are requesting the Variance from the City in order to construct the sign which would consist of approximately 95sq. ft. and would have the Minnesota Bank Eagan logo plus an electronic reader board which would display advertising plus time and tempera- ture. The bank representatives feel that this pylon sign would get the added' visibility they need to bring customers to this branch bank facility.' If approved, the Conditional Use should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Variance from the 300' spacing shall be required. 2) The sign square footage shall be 95 sq. ft. or what is attached with the May 21 report. 3) Height shall be no more than 27' above ground level. DCR/jj //3 11] /�`__ NOOHSNIHE PM . FM 7 J Y •aurt �WMNI PMN cI i�� IQ¢ 1 ® of ri Fc Q "C r, XVj OLfdR OUNS oY�• 9¢ � �., I4 i L<uILF Q 141 ♦a/..f 0. br C0.0, L E c c 'NLP. -'pT 4' R-3 R-3 J:'�N c Nn i 1FEss� ryn�?Lom4O. 4 I y JNB yB y OP j r 4 i nlocEl-P .�y"- - PD JJJ NB. t.. I 30 ;a ��NpFEr P bn / j LE • I NCWXrs , I F'xXs Reda 175.2 C JF ^� CSC I ... Lc —JII I! RLM 108 R i4 IF 1•ir,. % � I l� 'I 16 (D Io .Vi r�1R% I� A, I P.p • • I 6 6 Minneso aDD Y Eagan aL,,,q }Y •e v. f �•,I•� si` � ISS � E ••• � �, � •• a �. • >. ���E• S•• • • • ••': Yir3/i �Ol ' � •Ci � y� \\ YantM Doodle Road ale EXISTING PYLON SIGN PYLON SIGN PROPOSAL Wer. M 4.r '!Y APC Minutes .May 27, 1986 SIGN ORDINANCE — FEDERAL LAND COMPANY TOWN CENTRE 70 a TOWN CENTRE 100 Chairperson McCrea opened the discussion requesting response from the Commissioners in regard to the need to review the Sign Ordinance and proposed amendments. City Planner Runkle introduced the information available regarding other area communities and their sign ordinances, along with a rough approximation of the maximum number of signs that could be allowed in the Town Centre 70 area, assuming the platting of the property that would allow such maximization. Discussion centered around whether a planned development could be'used to handle variances from the sign ordinance. It was suggested that the use of a planned development to allow variances from the sign ordinance would open the floodgates upon the sign ordinance restrictions. It was also argued that there are very few commercial planned developments in Eagan, thereby minimizing the impact of using the PD Agreement as a means of providing flexibility to the sign ordinance. The public hearing was.then convened. Mr. Charles Bartholdi appeared on behalf of Federal Land Company and indicated the willingness of Federal Land Company to enter into a Sign Agreement whereby the number of signs in Town Centre 100 would be restricted to 12 and the number of signs in Town Centre 70 to 16 signs. No one from the general public was present in regard to this issue and the public hearing was closed. After a lengthy discussion, Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to direct the staff to work out a Sign Agreement with Federal Land Company whereby variances to the sign ordinance would be specified along with the locations of the proposed signs. A legal opinion in regard to the'use of sign agreements and/or planned developments in order to provide for variances from the Sign Ordinance was requested. The agreement and opinion are to be provided to the Planning Commission in time for its members to review them prior to the meeting at which it is to be presented. All voted in favor. MINNESOTA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a VARIANCE The public hearing for a variance and conditional use permit for a pylon sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Yankee Doodle Road, west of. Pilot Knob Road, was then convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle then described the proposal and Mr. Mike Larkin appeared on behalf of the applicant. It was indicated that the bank now lacked visibility on Yankee Doodle Road, due to the development around it and that it was cooperating with the Amoco station adjacent to it in order to maximize the distance between pylon signs along Yankee Doodle Road, if a fourth pylon sign was to be allowed. It was then suggested that the applicant's request be considered together with the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move the existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition at the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. Mr. Runkle .pointed out that the Amoco Oil Company variance request was tied to two other variances for the expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station located on Lot L, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition, and apparently impacted the need to move the pylon sign for that location. APC Minutes May 27, 1986 The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station. Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive status in the area. Chairperson McCrea then ,convened the public hearing in regard to the Amoco Oil:Company request fora variance to move an existing pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public hearing was closed. Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed. Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and ® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the distance between signs would be asJollows: The distance between the Super America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be 275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet. 2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level. ® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant, being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping sign and the Amoco sign. 4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition, in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and the Amoco station. 3 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight VARIANCE TO MOVE PYLON SIGN/AMOCO OIL B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition --A public hearing was .held to consider a variance to move a pylon sign that currently advertises the Amoco Oil station on Yankee Doodle Road. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the variance, subject to conditions set forth in the Planning Department report. For a copy of the Planning Department report which pertains to this agenda item and agenda item C of new busi- ness, refer to pages through. For action that was take by the APC, ref r to a copy of those minutes found on • page(s) /Z j through /7_ (,, . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance to allow an existing pylon sign to be moved for .the Amoco Oil Company., • �� O CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR BLDG. SETBACK & VARIANCE FOR 20' GREEN AREA ALONG A PUBLIC ROAD & A VARIANCE TO MOVE A PYLON SIGN. APPLICANT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY, JIM RABUSE LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDN. EXISTING ZONING: NB (.UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ® APPLICATION: An apDl catian leas 's�sa su;-.:fitted requesting 3 Variances; 2 relating _o :yailCiag C�siSn anc 1Variance to relocate an existing pylon sign on Lo'- 1, Block 1: Bicz!ntennial 3rd Addition. COMMENTS: Mr. Rabuse has met with the Planning Department a number of times to see how he could provide additional service to his customers by remodeling his existing station to provide one-stop convenience shopping, along with gas, in order to compe`-e with other facilities in the general area. Mr. Rabuse has submitted a revised site plan which shows a remodeling or building addition to the east of which the building would go to approximately 3' at the east property line. The most easterly extension would be remodeled for the car wash. The location of the existing car wash would be converted for the convenience foods and in relocating the car wash facility, the traffic circulation would be reversed from what it presently is. Therefore, a widening of the driveway area on the north property line would be required to get adequate stacking and ® circulation. The traffic would then go from the north to the south through the car wash facility and out to access on 81st St. versus Washington Dr. Mr. Rabuse has contacted the adjacent property owners of which a letter is attached with their submittal stating they have no problem with the Variance encroachment on the east. If the Variance is approved for the building expansion, then the applicant is requesting to move the pylon sign which is presently located in the northeast corner of the lot further west or closer to the intersection of Washington Dr. and Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed is a rendering of the sign which the applicant would construct if the Variance is approved. The variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2) All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to . 3) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20' green area. /ZD April 28, 1986 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Subject: Variance Request - Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition (Yankee Square Standard) Dear Council Members: • If approved, it is the purpose of this variance to allow for the remodeling of the current existing structure to provide for ancillary sales and interior convenience to and for the motoring public. This request will enable Yankee Square Standard to re -position itself to better serve the increasing needs and wants of the customer and for the growth of the Eagan. community. The following variance or variances are respectfully requested: 1.) 0 -Zero Setback from the East property line to allow for the addition of a Car Wash bay and the re-routing of drive to allow for'ease of vehicle egress. 2.) 0 -Zero Setback from the North property line for the re-routing of drive to allow for ease of vehicle ingress. Respectfully, W. J. Rabuse Yankee Square Standard 1424 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 612/454-5522 �ww "e'-pluttm April 21, 1986 Mr. N.J. Rabuse Vice President Y.F. Inc. 1424 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan AIN 55121 Dear Jim, Minnesota National Bank of Eagan has no objection to a zero(0) variance from the East property line for your building expansion on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentenial Third Addition. Please keep me advised as to your progress on this matter. Yours truly, MI`NE80TA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN -17 M.E.Larkin President MII /lr 1-2,7- Minnesota 2%i Minnesota Nacional Hunk of Fagan 3900 Sihle% Memorial I liehYc:rc I:.I�d n. 1\11MUSOM 1512] (6I') -151-i'00 I I&A �i APC Minutes May 27, 1986 The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station. Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive status in the area. Chairperson' McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move an existing pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public hearing was closed. Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed. Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and ® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the distance between signs would be as follows: The distance between the Super America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be 275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the following conditions: . 1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet. 2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level. ® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant, being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping sign and the Amoco sign. 4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition, in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and the Amoco station. /y5 3 APC Minutes May 27, 1986 Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request. Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section L6, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: • 1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20 foot green area. . 4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent driveways. All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180 square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue. Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council. Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property. All voted in favor. / 4 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine /EXPANSION AND C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard') from Setback Requirements for Expansion and Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station ---A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a variance for a building setback and a 20 foot green area along Yankee Doodle Road for the expansion and remodeling of the Yankee Square Standard gas station. The APC is recommending approval of both variances as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report that was provided as a part of the aforementioned agenda item B of New Business. • For additional information on the action that was taken by .the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)�. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing Yankee Square gas station. APC Minutes May 27, 1986 Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request. Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two ® variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2. Ali other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20 foot green area. .. 4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent driveways. Ail voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. ® DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180 square feet per 'face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue. Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council. Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50.per square foot. 3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property. All voted in favor, 4 • Agenda Information Memo 'June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Thirty CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN FOR DALLAS DEVELOPMENT D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon Sign for an Office/Warehouse--A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on May 27, 1'986, to consider an application that was submitted by the Dallas Development Company for a .conditional use permit to allow a locational sign for their project. The APC is recom- mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy if enclosed on pages /3d through /:33 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of their minutes found on page(s) /9�/ . ACTION, TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit to allow a pylon sign for an office/warehouse as presented by the Dallas Development Corporation. iZ9 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 1ST ADDN. SEa, SEC. 18 EXISTING ZONING: LI - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Dallas Development company requesting a Conditional Use permit to allow a locational sign for the recently approved Dallas Development 1st Addition. This 103,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse is now under full construction and is located west of Hwy. 13 and south of Silver Bell Road. COMMENTS: A Conditional Use Permit is required since the proposed monument style sign is over 7'. The sign will have an interior angle of 44" and both sides will be visible from Hwy. 13. The intent was to create a sign that would "mirror" the style of the building. This would be achieved by using similar materials and rounded corners. The base of the sign (3.5' tall) will be constructed of rock -faced concrete block and will contain a planting area. The actual signage area will measure 22' at • the base and form a half -circle. This area will be made of 6" horizontal cedar boards. The lettering will be interior lighted and 8" tall. The overall signage area will be approximately 180 sq.ft./side and the height at the top of the sign will reach 12.5'. The height is necessary since the sign is in a large parking island and must be visable above the parked cars. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) This sign be the only monument sign over 7' on the site. 2) The one-time sign permit fee, of $2.50/sq.ft. of signage area. JS/jj l� l3l m ME PLAN DATA I" tAa W m ME PLAN D V n1101111=I�I�I��ISI �Yn! SWI®Iplwy���l �I�I�SMO awiem�nnn��unnn��®i�nn��s�nnnnam® sw®ne_i nnnn����nnn���i�m�eo • SIGN PLAN X33 APC Minutes May 21, 1986 Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request. Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 10 Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2. Ail other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20 foot green area. . 4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent driveways. Ali voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180 square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue. Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council. Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property. All voted in favor. / 2 4 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EQUITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MOTEC TRANSMISSION E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motet Transmission) for a Pylon Sign --A public healing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting heldon May 27, 1986, to consider a conditional use permit for a pylon sign in the Barton McGray Addition as submitted by Equity Construction/Motet Transmission. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign. For additional information on the item, refer to the Planning Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages through /3P . /gpe- mi�utea� p. In reviewing this application, i -t occurred to the City Administra- tor that a conditional use permit for a pylon sign had been applied for at .one time by Motec Transmission. That pylon sign was denied. Since a variance is more than likely required to the lineal footage distance between the Mediterranean Cruise sign and the Motec sign that is proposed for the 'T.H.13 frontage, additional information will be forthcoming with the Administrative packet to better explain the variance and history of the sign that was denied for Motec Transmission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit for a pylon sign for Equity Construction Company/ Motec Transmission. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MOTEC TRANSMISSION CLINICS LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: GB - GENERAL BUSINESS (NE;, SEC. 19) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM, PLANNER I ® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit t"o allow a pylon sign for Motec Transmission Clinics on Lot 4, Block 1, of the Barton McGray Addition. COMMENTS. All seven lots in this addition have frontage along Cedarview Drive, a service -road for Cedarvale Blvd. Lot 2 (Sherwin Williams Paint) and the Mediterranean Cruise :Restaurant, Lot 5, have pylon signs along this service road. They are approximately 400' apart. (See exhibit.) City Code requires 300 lineal ft. between pylon signs on the same side of the street and a maximum height of 27=. The proposed sign is 20' tall, two -directional, interior -lighted and has a signage area of 60 sq. ft. The applicant will locate this sign along the northwest property line that abutts MnDOT (Hwy. 13) right-of-way. The widest portion of the sign must be kept 10' within the property line. No other pylon sign is • being proposed along Cedarview Drive. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1) Sign placement as approved by the City Council. 2) The one-time sign fee of $2.,50/sq.ft. JS/jj 1�6 13� Ll • • N IG�x l�aYy ra. vwIr NIgw E city of Bogan Department of Planning i APC Minutes May 27, 1986 MOTEC TRANSMISSION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was poincea out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council. 2. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to be 300 feet from any adjacent signs. All voted in favor except Voracek who voted no. R. K. SCHEURENBRAND — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was present and explained the .proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other necessary licenses. 2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes shall be adhered to. 3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time. 4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the site without City Council approval. 5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor control. Ali voted in favor. 5 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/R. KAYE SCHEURENBRAND FOR BOARDING KENNEL F. Conditional Use Permit/R. Kaye Scheurenbrand for a Commercial Board Kennel --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the May 27, 1986, meeting to consider a conditional use permit.. application submitted by Kaye Scheurenbrand to allow a temporary animal grooming, and kennel facility on 5,.81 acres west of Highway 3. The Advisory Planning Commission is recom- mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented. For additional information, refer to the Planning Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages/through / 6 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)1!�Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for a commercial boarding kennel as applied for by Kaye Schuerenbrand. /,416 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: KAYE SCHEURENBRAND LOCATION: NE a, SECTION 36 EXISTING ZONING: A, AGRICULTURE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20., 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a temporary animal grooming and kennel facility on 5.81 acres west of Highway 3 in Section 36. COMMENTS: The Code requires that a license to operate and maintain a dog kennel be obtained from the City and that a Conditional Use Permit be requiredfor kennels on 5+ Agricultural parcels. The applicant intends to remodel an existing 3 -car garage into a boarding kennel that contains 10 2' x 4' or 5 4' x 4' upper/lower cages. In front of these cages are 2' x 10' exercise runs. The application is temporary since the applicant wishes to construct a permanent facility of approximately 4,000 sq. ft_ in the future that may serve as the City Animal Pound. The City Animal Warden has reviewed the submitted plan and it meets her approval. ® Several letters of recommendation have been included with the application and 2 have been attached for your review. Note. The applicant does not own theproperty at this time, but has an option to buy subject to. the approval of the Conditional Use Permit. If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1) The applicant obtaining a City Kennel License and all other necessary licenses. 2) A building permit be required for the remodeling and that all Codes be adhered to. 3) The maximum number of animals not exceed 10 at one time. 4) No future building expansion or future building on the site without City Council approval. 5) All animals be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor control. JS/jj /�(L 0 E 22.46 TiF -/�, • -- • - as -. Ll 2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811 June 1, 1983 City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_ It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and she has always been extremely cooperative. Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize any possible noise violation. I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset to your community as she has been to ours. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Robert A. Mood, Manager Building and Inspection Division cln AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER vl� my Of 000mington 2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811 June 1, 1983 City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_ It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and she has always been extremely cooperative. Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize any possible noise violation. I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset to your community as she has been to ours. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Robert A. Mood, Manager Building and Inspection Division cln AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SOUTH HYLAND VETERINARY HOSPITAL JAMES A. LIBBY. D.V.M. BEVERLY MAINS. O.V.M. _ 5600 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55437 ■61-1!6• October 1, 1984 City Council Bloomington, Mn I am writing on behalf of Kaye Scheurenbrand and am pleased to recommend your approval of her proposed grooming and boarding facility. I have known Kaye for over 14 years and have a high regard for her ability to operate a clean, sanitary, and professional facility. This should be a nice asset to our community. inz rely, mes A. Libby D. .M. • APC Minutes May 27, 1986 MOTEC TRANSMISSION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was pointed out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: ® 1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to be 300 feet from any adjacent signs. Ail voted in favor except Voracek who voted no. R. K. SCHEURENBRAND - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was present and explained the proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other necessary licenses. 2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes shall be adhered to. 3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time. 4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the site without City Council approval. 5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor control. Ali voted in favor. 147 5 • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three WAIVER OF PLAT/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life/Opus Corporation) to Split Lot 18 and Combine N% of Lots 19 & 20, Creating a New Four -Acre Parcel Located N of Lone Oak Road and W of Service Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on May 27, 1986, to consider a waiver of plat applica- tion to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new four -acre lot in the Eagandale Industrial Park #1. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the application. For additional information on the item, refer to the Planning and Engineering report which is enclosed on pagesl�,f through /5y. For action that was taken by the APC, refer td —those minutes found on page(;s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat application as presented by the Opus Corporation/ Northwestern Mutual Life. I f�� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE LOCATION: LOTS 18-20, BLOCK 5, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PK..# SEa, SECTION 3 EXISTING ZONING: L1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 28, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING ® APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new 4 ac lot in the Eagandale Industrial Park #1. This lot is north of Lone Oak Road and has approximately 325' of frontage on West Service Road. Champion International will abut this site to the NE. Northwestern Warehouse and a 45' railroad easement form the rear property line. As a result of this Waiver, Lot 17 will be increased to a more .developable 3 -acre lot. The newly formed lot will contain a one-story brick office/warehouse built for National Business Systems. The submitted site plan meets Code setback, lot coverage and parking requirements. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to: ® 1) A $.02/ft. Parks Dedication Fee. 2) A detailed landscape plan approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3) All other Code requirements. JS/jj #q 166 Ll 0 yC vVTC 43 EAGANDALE BUSINESSB.K. 1 l•. CAMPUS OS �. McKEE EAGANOALE CJOFFICEG :ENTER "p.. pO s 3 GaG�? . FIRS?� T plLf R •NEW 0O LOTI BLKI HOLLAND Y",.. -Ir 21 DIVISION OF 15 SPERRV 14 17 ,' ovsnEw RANDS SIEVE H - $ BUSINESS • �P 17 cEME D moN AMERICAN 45�J5� \02 10 FRUIT & 3� R p PRODUCE 1'r ati�02P race.w. SH �P OUTLOT n..c 14 u.c •y\ :� •A� F P ns.c aF 19 ...c 15 ' 19 •l6i �b OUTLOT 6 6 ..;x 7.:.. 1B Sr .c A .AL .26 ..� 16 $ OU®LOTS K .r 17 10. SS7� " 16 sor OUTL T3 OUTLOT4 ..r 5 19 6 u]¢ ... 911 .or 6 1 E.0 es uu o .c au K • LEMAY UNPLATD UNPLATTED LAKE a]I K APARTMENTS BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR: NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. K EAG .N1?AI_E,CE: 'TER INi!Uoc\T / /'/\\ UCT. 19 / \ YS \ lOT IB N RIIAL SARK '-,_//i I. I.r..... =jw. 11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic. il i "'i 11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic. APC Minutes May 27, 1986 NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION WAIVER OF PLAT Chairperson McCrea next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eaganaale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section '3, north of Lone Oak Road on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions: ® 1. There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication fee. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with. 4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the Engineering report. All voted in favor. BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway #55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St. Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from PD to R-1. All voted yea. /'�3 I Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four REZONING FROM PD TO R-1/BUR OAK HILLS H. Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD to R-1 for Approximately 111 Acres --An application was submitted by the Harsted Companies to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development from a PD to R-1 District. This application is a result of a require- ment by the City Council when the preliminary plat was acted on at the April 15, 1986, meeting. The APC is recommending approval of the rezoning. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages through /(e45 For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page (s) //o/P • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from PD to R-1 for the Bur Oak Hills development. /5�z .CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES LOCATION: Sz, SECTION 12 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Harstad Companies to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development (PD 74-5) to a R-1 (Single Family) district. The Preliminary Plat consisting of 205 lots on 111 acres was approved subject to this rezoning on April 15, 1986. The developer is in the process of completing final plat require- ments. JS/jj • J6el A -- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES (BUR OAKS) LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY: NE;, SE4, SA, SECTION 12 PD (SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS) JANUARY 28, 1986 JANUARY 23, 1986 PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUBMITTED • An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for 204 single family lots in the South Delaware Hills Planned Development in Section 12. ZONING & LAND USE This 111 acre site abuts Inver Grove Heights to the east, highway 149 to the west, agricultural parcels and Bur Oaks Park to the north with more PD land to the south. A preliminary plat for this site was approved on September 18, 1979. All of the lots are above the 12,000 s.f. minimum for an R-1 (single family) classification and meet the 85' width at the setback line. BACKGROUND/COMMENTS There has been an issue as to whether this PD agreement is still • valid. The City Attorney's office has verified that it is and any deviation from the approved planned development preliminary plat of 1979 will require another public. hearing. Therefore, this plat will also require a rezoning to R-1 (single family). The submitted preliminary plat shows extensive grading in areas that were dedicated parkland in the previously approved plat. As a result, the densly wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be graded substantially. The Parks and Recreation .Dept has briefly reviewed this site and is opposed to it for, several reasons: 1) The wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be destroyed by the proposed grading. 2) The area that includes the tennis courts has 3.1 slopes along the western property line where typically 5.1.is needed for practical use/maintenance. 3) The access into the park is only one.lot wide fronting Rolling Hills Dr where the recommendations by the Parks Staff and Consultant was for a four lot area. - /55 - BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 2 The Parks & Recreation Dept does not feel that there is suitable reason to waiver from the previously submitted parkland dedication requirements. GRADING The grading proposed by the applicant is feasible from an engineer- ing standpoint. That is, it meets all City criteria for slopes and grades with the exception of maintaining a 2% grade at inter- sections. There are several intersections where this 20 grade is exceeded. However, the applicant can revise the grading plan to provide for the required 2% slopes for 100' at the intersections. Because of the rugged topography, -there -are several areas on ® the applicant's grading plan showing 2:1 slopes. While these slopes are within City Codes, they are very difficult to maintain once permanent vegetation is established. Until that time, these slopes are extremely susceptible to erosion. As a result, the staff will recommend a detailed proposal from this applicant as to how he proposes to control erosion on this site. Also, staff recommends the applicant revise the grading plan at intersec- tions where he does not achieve a 20 slope for 100' past the intersection. Finally, because the applicant proposes to encroach on Williams Brothers Pipeline easement for grading his site, staff recommends the applicant obtain written authorization from Williams Brothers Pipeline allowing them to perform the necessary grading operations within Williams Brothers easement. DRAINAGE The proposed grading in this site will not change any of the existing drainage patterns. This site is located within major drainage district G as shown on Figure 1. All of this site eventually ends up into Pond GP -1 (Burr Oak Pond).. A positive outlet is in place for this pond which outlets to downstream ponds that all have positive outlets to the Minnesota River valley. This development will be responsible for providing the necessary ponding area for GP -1 and also for the portion of Pond GP -8, located within this development. This development will require the extension of trunk storm sewer between Pond GP -8 and Pond GP -1. It also will require the extension of trunk storm sewer from GP -1 southerly to its southern boundary. If the applicant chooses to have this work performed under City contract, then the City Council must authorize such a project prior to final plat approval. If the developer chooses to install City trunk storm sewer privately, then it will be at his own expense because the City has no provisions to provide credits . for work performed privately._ I5G 1 _BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 SANITARY SEWER This proposed development is located within sanitary sewer subdis- trict N -EE, as shown on Figure 2. The master plan proposes extending a 12" sanitary sewer southerly through this development to pick up the southerly most portion of subdistrict N -EE. However, the U.P.S. Addition (about 40 acres in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 13) was diverted from sub- district N -EE to subdistrict N -AA. Because of this, staff re- evaluated the necessity of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line. Staff's findings indicate that an 8" diameter sanitary sewer line would be adequate to provide service to subdistrict N -EE, thereby eliminating the necessity of any- trunk sanitary sewer within this area. This development will be responsible for extending sanitary sewer to their eastern boundary at appropriate locations to provide service to the area of this subdistrict located within Inver Grove Heights. It also will be required to extend sanitary sewer to its south boundary at an appropriate location and also to the parcel just easterly of the panhandle adjacent Highway 55. WATER MAIN This development will be responsible for extending an 8" water main from Highway 149 through this development to loop into the water main within Chapel Lane. It also will be responsible to stub water lines to its easterly and southerly boundaries where appropriate. STREETS Trunk Highway 149 borders the westerly portion of this development. 77th Street abuts the easterly edge of this development. Trunk Highway 149 is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and is a rural two-lane highway. 77th Street West is a rural roadway section under the jurisdiction. of Inver Grove Heights. With the exception of the two "bubbles" and the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac, staff agrees with the applicant's street plans. Staff recommends not approving the bubbles -for the following reasons: 1. There is no access hardship. The applicant is merely trying to obtain additional lots by using these bubbles. 2. The bubbles create a maintenance hardship and obstacle. 151 BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 4 3. The large paved areas within as children tend to play in close to the through streets. the bubbles create safety hazards them and they are located too 4. Council has experienced problems in the past with developers using the bubble only to obtain the necessary lot width and requesting vacation of excess easement after the fact. 5. The bubble on lot 11 should be eliminated and accessed up to the north for a future potential loop street through this parcel. This will eventually connect to the Rolling Hills Drive located within the panhandle. Staff feels that the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac should be eliminated because the only service it provides additional lot or two. Lis for an ot 1, Block 5 appears to be rather small for a corner lot anyway. The applicant will be responsible for constructing the temporary turn around shown in Inver Grove Heights. Also, the applicant will be responsible for the costs of connecting 77th Street West in Inver Grove Heights to their proposed 77th Street West. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate 60right-of-ways for all streets with 120' diameter cul-de-sacs. The developer shall also be responsible for dedicat- ing the southerly half of Rolling Hills Drive not shown on the preliminary plat. This development shall dedicate a 30' utility easement over ® all water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer not located within city right-of-way. This development will also be responsible for obtaining easements through the park property,' if required by the Park Department, for utilities. PERMITS This development will be responsible for permits: obtaining the necessary 1) MPGA sewer extension. 2) Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension. 3) MN Dot Access Permit. Because this development will generate more than 50,000 gallons per day of wastewater, the MPCA will require the preparation of an EA4P. This EAW preparation will be the responsibility of this developer. Staff recommends that no be granted until the City receives all permits. final plat approval BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 5 ASSESSMENTS In researching the City's assessment records, Staff has found that this development is still responsible for trunk area water main assessments, upgrading of trunk storm sewer area assessments because of large lot credit, and trunk area storm sewer assessments as indicated in the following summary table and as shown on Figure 3. (1) Includes 20o credit for streets (2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid) The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting attherates in effect at that time. CONDITIONS: 1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their easement. 3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8 to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions. 4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide for future extensions for later developments. /f�� ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd 1986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Area Water 70 Ac $1,190/Ac $83,300 Main (010-54, 011-04,010-79, 010-75,010-76,013-80) Trunk Area Storm Sewer 165,530 (1) 0.05/S.F. 8,276 (013-80) Trunk Area Storm Sewer 4.2 Ac $1,353/Ac (2) 5,683 Upgrade (011-04) - Total $97,259 (1) Includes 20o credit for streets (2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid) The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting attherates in effect at that time. CONDITIONS: 1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their easement. 3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8 to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions. 4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide for future extensions for later developments. /f�� BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 6 5) This development shall insure that through this plat from T.H. 149 within Chapel Ln. Extensions of and south boundaries will also be extensions. an 8" watermain is looped to the existing watermain water lateral to the east required for future service 6) The final plat shall be revised to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac (Rolling Hills Circle) in the SE corner, the half cul-de-sac (Hillside Dr "bubb-le") in the SW corner & the half cul-de-sac (Hillcrest Dr bubble") in the NE corner shall be eliminated and replaced by a "stub" street for future extension to the unplatted parcel south of T.H. 55. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with connecting 77th St west to the existing street in Inver Grove Heights. 7) The final plat shall provide for a permanent cul-de-sac in 160 the extreme northerly extension of Rolling Hills Dr with • platted right-of-way for a future westerly extension & ultimate connection to Chapel Ln. 8) All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 30' easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part of the final plat. 9) All permits required by local, County, Regional & State Agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 10) This development shall be responsible for all the additional assessments required with this- proposal as determined by the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. • 11) If public improvements are to be installed under City contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 160 HAIIGE, EIDE & F ELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW PAUL M. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER Mr. Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3906 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 January 16, 1986 Re: South Delaware Hills Planned Development Dear Dale: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 4544224 You have asked me to clarify the developer's rights under the South Delaware Hills Planned Development Agreement in regard to a preliminary plat being proposed which is different from the preliminary plat approved September 18, 1979. A Planned Development zone is not the equivalent of other zoning classifications with specific code criteria for land use, density, setbacks, parks, etc., other than as provided in the Planned Development Contract with its various exhibits. Under Eagan City Code, a Planned Development designation is a superimposed zoning designation (Section 11.20, Subd. 8) which requires the developer to provide specific information to allow a planned development which will better adapt itself to the physical and aesthetic settings of surrounding land than does existing zoning and yet be feasible for the owner and developer economically while benefiting the community at large to a greater degree than development of underlying zoning. Our files indicate that the Council has determined that the Planned Development Agreement commenced September 18, 1979, the same date as the approval of the preliminary plat for South Delaware Hills. The Planned Development Agreement in our filesappears to contain an exhibit in conformance with that proposed plat. Therefore, it is our opinion that any substantial deviation from the planned development agreement and the preliminary plat exhibit attached thereto would require Council approval and trigger the public hearing process with the required mailed notices to adjacent land owners. Substantial alterations would include changes in land use, parks and extensive grading. DGK:ras cc: Thomas Hedges Very truly yours, HAUGE, EIDE 6 KELLER, P.A. David G. Keller C E C J 0 0 a 3 r- i .. 1 ✓mil +\�\\�v`����J 1 � j�� ',ll ,4 Lc•y . I� T_!� ! 'fr(_ �l�'/ 1 11�� '�. 11 ' ; ��� �.`` i�-.�5.�?�� ' � 4i•. � � lI �y� r �`T�J[ I K I �1.' I ��'�q � � � `F 4-� a - I •� �—I y d �• •�. ♦ n 1 i' 7//��/ �.,!� /%� . ` d �\ a, -.y1 \\\ OWIFA 177 B OAK UR HILLS 40EYELOPQI • v t\ a -n y 111 ��• �, '� • > .-\ r, � , IIU ''�"��: ik �I E- ,:e+ 7 •n u.,a ti I PRELIMINARY PLAT � •L � \\\1�1 �.` �j/ /^w[ [[-i s " .` „� e"`��n` � /,,q,.- �1 <,�,.T',s\ .(1:.-'. �.`:...:w [.•.. ti �- \ a 11 -. I � - /� / -moi � • ,c . ,\, � D �' � I F' � •r�\ �= I \ 1i> 1 � 1,, ',1., •II y `�' a q Ij 1 :` .... ..r+': \I``\'f. \' •, - �,,�� .1 'r/4[[;a<�' �JJ1�/�]11111 iX1 �!�FF''\ P\ .�.• _�j r' , i; r• �J1, 1 ,/ ` ,. � 1 �-.•" 1 o.rrs r...r.�- _ r \\/� t 1 "� �' � //" / �L -�- ' .1 � \ � .'.� lyd ,: / 1 i.. z� � �! [ i I--=1' 'I_ I1 �.�-e•.' v..��.�...... �� \ '\ [ I �'1 '� •'R4R,[ Aon ' //) -i a ."} " �— i o - J• '. .1 a, � , -. • C i - / � qr 1 \ � � i14,(I y e I ; I,w, j1�- � �.¢ / • _ \� �" �\� � If CI..[ i .[ :[tay'[ ��•I `J I l ��III111 '�"C ? j<(il �`9 _�.°.r" ..�.) [G�✓ �,.. VA v --.---__—__-- y-- �� IL`;1�7•'�"_ e--'j-'��sF r 1' 71i f I r ' 1�� ' �J 4..1 i , p`\`f� ��} -1 _� ___ C _ n '..so i i-�,`a•�tA. � �� .t ^ \.•� t � r/. `u( �:�/<� \r:) i ��. i� '^f' 01r- • 1 • City of eagan r PUBLIC $ 117 WORKS DEPARTME 829.0 856,0 f �I � r\ V 77 0 B B0. \` 880 885.5 FP -9 8912 8870 890.0 P-8 I I 77.3 166.0 I IIS 'll ................ .... ............ .......... .. .... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. #1 approved: standard plate 4;.: CFNTER� _�X_zl -CNE JK RCC J I i -- -N-P Ir`Is I\ 85 _I CE\TER IS I 18 Vr— ty \ N-0, I ORARY M fi 5 �\ N. - C C.,, l\ a� rc a15 99 18 ..i \' \\ � N - J J II IA*** 15.,:, i N -EE WESCOTr c5E I i I I N -Z GARDEN LOTS I \\I\ 12 N -X 95 �\ _ l� �sN W I 13 \1 sski29„ N - city of eagan PUBLIC $ I - WORKS DEPARTF M ` SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN AA • FIG. #2 approved: standard Plate #p: APC Minutes May 27, 1986 MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION WAIVER OF PLAT Chairperson McCrea next convened the public, hearing in regard to the application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 3, north of Lone Oak Road on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions: • 1. There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication fee. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with. 4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the Engineering report. All voted in favor. BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway #55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St. Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from PD to R-1. All voted yea. * i Agenda Information Memo June 17, 198'6., City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five VARIANCE/RUSCON HOMES I. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Side Yard Setback Requirement for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition --An application was submitted by Ruscon Homes for a side yard variance of approxi- mately 2'' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the Park Ridge Addition. For additional information on this item refer to the Planning Depart- ment report, copies enclosed on page //e?. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance as presented by Ruscon Homes. • 14, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: RUSCON HOMES LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 4, PARK RIDGE ADDN. EXISTING ZONING: R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ®APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a side yard variance of approximately 2' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the Par', Ridge Addition. This is an existing house that fronts on [gest End Trail. The original survey and building location met all City setback requirements and the building permit was issued on 8-23-83. In mid-April 1986, the lot to the south was surveyed in order to locate a fence. That is when the setbac:< error was discovered. Apparently, the field stakes we•eshifted by one of the contractors. The variance is requested to avoid any potential legal problems. The distance between both homes is in excess of 21'. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. 0 40 4y 'q I� ➢ I „ I��I'I r a�5 ii ei' 0.• i)ofl nz677uz w (07.00 — EXISTING 7 W H � I O VI W I � � siL.T-[... � X57•-.r-C.••ty � Z h�w� Z ----------- rase I� J I IiaN,•. � < c 0 K TA.S. 9 TAM1 Z 1b.zo °5zo' �s' / 'e� aa�'� i—�..—-----� J� Cd -o, e•zz �5• � -�- _ y p:493. ct•5I IVE. �T o— _ �. _ W inl7 �' e Agenda Information Memo June 17, 19186, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six SPECIAL PERMIT/GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT FOR MODEL HOME J. Special Permit (Overbill Replat Grand Oaks Development) to allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval --An application was submitted for a special permit Grand Oaks Development request- ing a Model Home prior to final plat approval. For additional information on this item refer to the Planning Department. report and a letter from the developer requesting the Model Home permit • as referenced on pages / j) through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit application as requested by Grand Oaks Development. 167 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a special permit to allow a building permit for a model home prior to final plat approval. The applicant desires this special permit due to the upcoming "Parade of Homes" and the heavy final plat workload on City staff. Attached is a letter explaining this hardship request in greater detail. The proposed home is a split entry and is 54' wide. No setback variances will be required. If approved the special permit shall be subject to the following: ® 1) This lot not receiving any setback variances 2) This model home not be sold for home occupancy until all public utilities are connected. 3) This model home be the only model in this addition. /,O -"AKE FOI NTE v i • •R .0 i I � = vva I:Yu�� 6 g� 7 B�j 8' 9 g•n LL�10 ��tr Iyi'' ff.e :e Sy Ra 9b =:•�':�Y n%! r .e.FJ '° • ` L it ze 16 I . ^ S � _ S+. 7 • a 15 B la 6.a 13 = 6• d. Jtl' •ate-. .8 -i _ to - 9 a.n u17d 3 9 5 6.'Rr .7 R•a R'6 _18. Id .- it C - A ac la l�.an . tee.,•,. 0,4 m e�>< :± ~- : na as \ a3 law rw ter..; \ a 5, t bo • Via. - 'am.:^i.;' >n--�. _.r. _' _ _ i aA __..v w._ o,• ,,,,a - .'.��•a.ia.O. a \ .o , %'. 3m ='^ 8 n 5 — __ _ ate.• '�'t •�+. •8 a6 b .. C—ORGINAGE \I ( B UTILITY ISI EASEMENT PER PLAT, - 5 LOT 2 U • .I 03 I r�, I (947!) 500 CCtl III PRO/SED 0 Q o I "./ MOUSE 19.0/// N -J 8(D 2e.O I. e clj d' I o(947. I N GA/0) F. ry I I !n 26.0 (9 7 IIII 4 a) o> IoO SQA ;t1.N;' I —J e 12.96 .� I 0 19u .D) 3T6'4 "E` 79.30 - R=1884.29 D 4=2°24'41" l9 I,l HAY LAKE ROAD - June 12, 1986 . TO: Members of the Eagan Council RE: Lot 2, Block 4 Overhill Replat Model Permit Due to the extremely heavy back log of final plat proposals is submitted for spots on your agenda, we find ourselves in a very precarious position. The Minneapolis and St. Paul "Parade of Homes" (the largest builder promotion of the year) will be held September 7-22, 1986. Over 50% of our business for the following 12 months comes from that Parade. We respectfully request you grant a Model permit for our "Parade of Homes" model. This will allow us to continue business and represent the Eagan area with quality exhibits in the 1986-87 home market. Your cooperation and understanding in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Thank you. ® Michael A. Parish President re s i den/�t/,/7�, - "\ `' Mare Montgomery Vice -President 1881 Sunrise Court ECocn, MM 55122 (612) 452-0747 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Seven GENERAL LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE K_ 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance Renewal --The City's General Liability and Workers Compensation .Insurance expires on June 30, 1986. As previously stated, the Home Insurance Company who is the present carrier of the City's insurance, is no longer issuing municipal insurance coverage. Therefore the City's insurance agent, Mr. Bruce Medvec of Valley View Insurance, has researched other carriers and apparently the • League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Plan is the best possible one of only two alternatives available to the City. The Finance Committee, at the direction of the City Council, met at noon on May 29 to discuss the City's insurance program with the Director of Finance and City Administrator. At that meeting, Mr. Medvec indicated that the quotes from the League of Minnesota Cities should be available on approximately June 13 for review and consideration on the June 17 meeting. The City has received the self-insured workers com ensation quotation which is enclosed on pages /7/- through for your review. Also attached is a copy of a League of Minnesota Cities memo that discusses the self-insured workers compensation program that was attached to the quotation offering. Mr. Medvec has been assured that the general liability and additional workers information will be available Friday afternoon; however, the quotations will take time to review, therefore, final quotes for both the workers compensation and general liability will be sent out with the administrative packet on Monday. Mr. Medvec will be present at the meeting on Tuesday for review and answering 40 questions. The memo that was submitted as a part of the last City Council packet outlining the Finance Committee's meeting is again enclosed on pages -L7-7- through -4ZE for your reference. In the most recent Nation's Cities Weekly dated June 2, 1986, an article appeared on insurance and apparently legislation is being considered under the Risk Retention Act Amendments of 1986 that would allow local units of government to establish risk retention groups and to purchase liability insurance on a group basis. Enclosed on page /1'9 is a copy of this article for your review. This article is inf—or�Tational only. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a general liability and workers compensation program for 1986/1987 to be effective July 1, 1986. /%3 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST Self -Insured Workers' Compensation Quotation Plan Administrators: Employee Benefit Administration Co. 6950 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 401 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Telephone (612) 544-0311 Name of City: Policy Period: From July 1. 1986 To July 1. 1987 Estimated Annual Premium: Street and Road Construction ®Waterworks Electric Power Co. & Steam Heating Sewage Plant Firemen (Not Volunteer) Firemen (Volunteer) Policemen Store Risks Retail Clerical Office Building Operations Restaurants and Bars Pa rks Street B, Sewer Cleaning, Snow Removal Municipal Employees 0 Code 5506 7520 7539 7580 7706 7708 7720 8017 8810 9015 9079 9102 9402 9410 1986 Estimate Manual Experience Modification Factor Standard Premium Premium Discount Discounted Standard Premium LMCIT Discount 5 % Net Deposit Premium Rate $9.35 6.68 4.36 4.68 12.93 31.53 5.63 1.60 .24 6.34 2.89 5.60 11.78 2.53 Estimated Payroll 228.000 134.000 Deposit Premium 30,456 POP* 9,603 961,000 54,104 641,000 24,000 266,000 34,000 592,000 1,538 1,522 14,896 4.005 14,978 130,915. .79 103,422. 9,432. 93,990. 4.700. .O The foregoing quotation is fora deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. Your final, actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your policy year and will be subject to revisions in rate or experience modification. While you are a member of the LMCIT Workers' Compensation Plan, you will be eligible to participate in distributions from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings of the Trust. /7el EBA 441 Employee Benef-KAdministrat;on Co. ent s l` IIII llll 11 HilU league of minnesota cities LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST SELF-INSURED WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM The League of Minnesota Cities' workers' compensation program was created as a means of lowering cities' workers' compensation costs. The program is a joint self-insured program, and is offered through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), a joint powers entity. This self-insured program was designed for the League by Employee Benefit Administration Co. The prograin completed its sixth year of operation with over 500 participating cities, representing a standard premium volume of over $8.0 million. The following table shows the program's past results. Initial Discount Year -End Dividend Total Savings 1980 6p 25' 31`% 1981 15P 25% 40% 1982 18p 20% 38n 1933 18% 16% 34�a The discount was 20% in 1984 and 10' in 1985; no dividends were returned for these years. For 1986, the discount is 5`p. HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS Each city participating in the program deposits with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust its workers' compensation deposit premium for its policy year. This deposit premium is calculated using standard manual rates with the applicable volume discounts and experience modification, and discounting 5p from this figure. From these deposits, LMCIT purchases reinsurance to protect the program from catastrophic and abnormal claims; pays for administrative and loss control services; and pays claims. The balance of the deposits and reserves are invested, with the earnings accruing to the benefit of the participants. After the close of the program year, surplus monies in excess of appropriate reserves are returned to participants under a formula taking into account the earnings and claims experience of the Trust, as well as the loss records of individual participants. ELIGIBILITY All members of the League of Minnesota Cities are eligible to participate. However, LMCIT may require a city with a poor loss recoru to comply with specified safety practices as a condition of participation. 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600 LJ ADI•iINISTRATION LIMCIT nas appointed Employee Benefit Administration Co. (E.B.A.) as administrator of the program. E.B.A. also administers a similar pian for the Minnesota School Boards Association and offers a fully qualified staff in all areas of workers' compensation administration. The cost of administration of the program is 101. of standard premium. Services provided by the administrator include: 1. Determination of premium for participants. 2. On-site safety inspections and development of loss control program. 3. Claims processing, investigation and payment. 4. Legal counsel for disputed claims up to the Appeals Court trial. 5. Loss reports to individual participants and to LICIT. 6. Preparation of reports required by state autnorities. REINSURANCE To protect LMCIT from the adverse effects of catastrop!ric and abnormal claims, LMCIT purchases reinsurance from two sources. The state 'Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Association provides individual excess coverage. This covers workers' compensation claims arising out of any single occurrence which exceed $360,000. LMCIT also purchases aggregate excess coverage to protect against the possibility that the total claims will exceed the funds available. ADVANTAGES OF THE PROGRAM 1. Lower operating costs. Conventional insurance carriers typically allow between 30% and 40% of the premium dollar for administrative costs. Tne total cost to LMCIT for administration, reinsurance, and commissions is well under 20%. ® 2. Investment Income. Earnings on investments accrue to the benefit of participants. Due to the long-term nature of certain workers' compensation claims, substantial reserves are built up in the program. These reserves, along with premium deposits, are invested; the investment income further„_reduces the program costs. 3. Loss Control. A specialized approach to loss control provides practical assistance in reducing losses. 4. [ion -profit. Since the LMCIT program is non-profit, all excess funds are available for distribution to participants. PARTICIPATIOL This program is offered to cities through independent agents. For further infomation, contact: Employee Benefit Administration Co. League of Minnesota Cities 6950Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430 or 153 University Ave. E. Minneapolis, M!'7 55426 St. Paul, fain. 55101 Phone: (612) 544-0311 Phone: (612) 227-5600 f 76 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 2, 1986 SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING FOR PURPOSE OF REVIEWING CITY INSURANCE PROGRAM A meeting of the Finance Committee was held at noon on May 29, 1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building. Present were its Chairperson, City Councilmember Smith, City Councilmember Egan, Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Intern Johannes and the City Administrator. Also present was Bruce Medvec, the City's insurance agent. Mr. Medvec informed the Committee that Eagan has enjoyed to date the equivalent of a full insurance coverage package for general liability and worker's compensation. He reminded the Finance Committee that the City has $1,000,000 of basic liability insurance and a $2,000,000 umbrella providing a total coverage of $3,000,000. Fortunately, the cost for a total coverage of $3,000,000 has been extremely reasonable to the City in comparison to projection for an equivalent package in the future. Bruce .spoke to the new market that has developed in recent months stating that afford- ability and availability are significant problems for municipal insurance renewals. It is the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the City not continue with an umbrella coverage due to the high premium cost. For the City to be insured greater than the $600,000 statutory amount, the cost for a premium would be in the range of $80,000-$10'0,000 for $1,000,000 of additional umbrella coverage. This past year, $2,000,000 of umbrella coverage cost the City approximately $40,000. It was also the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the City raise its deductibles under the general liability portion of the insurance package in an effort to target a savings of approximately $20,000. It was the opinion of Bruce and the Finance Committee that the City should budget any savings it might realize by raising the deductibles therefore creating a special fund for the smaller claims. Because of self-insuring and cities assuming more risk, it is Bruce's opinion that our City may not experience any premium increase over the 1985-1986 amounts. Mr. Medvec has submitted a specification to the League of Minnesota Cities and is hopeful that a quote will be returned prior to June 13 for review and consideration at the June 17 meeting. The LMC insurance package is about the only coverage available to municipalities at this time. There is another insurance company that provides municipal insurance; however, it is provided on an actual claim basis as opposed to an occurence basis --the latter being more consistent with Eagan's past practice. The Finance Committee also discussed the necessity for increasing the City of Eagan's awareness and activity in a more formalized 17, risk management program. Mr. Medvec indicated that as the City's insurance agent, a part of his service is to provide risk manage- ment analysis for all departments. There were a number of topics discussed such as: * Coverage of Firefighters * Safety Belt Law * Safety Committee * Police SWAT Team * Engineering Design * Employee Awareness The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:00 is the intention of the Finance Committee to meet as a committee or by a teleconference call prior is 17 City Council meeting for the purpose of examining that is submitted by the League of Minnesota Cities. and information will be provided as a part of the packet with the June 17 agenda information. Cit Administrator TLH/kf • /70 p.m. and it again either to the June the quotation More detail City Council Nation's Cities Weekly June 2, 1986 i request to cities as, well at approximately the end of June. -- z .There has been some discussion in the Senate of a proposal to include within the 1987 budget instructions ,or reconc lia- tion legislation a provision requiring the mandatory participation of all state and local employees in the Medicare system. Preliminary estimates of requiring all state and local employees to participate in Medicare indicate a total fiscal impact to state and local governments of $8.3 billion over three years under such a plan. NLC strongly opposes any such pro- posal. LIABILITY INSURANCE 5.2129, the Risk Retention Act Amendments of 1986 remains mired as efforts continue to proceed to the Senate floor for full Senate consideration. Spon- sored by Sen. Bob Kasten (R-Wisc.), this legislation, strongly supported by NLC, _ would facilitate the ability of state and local units of government to establish risk retention groups and to purchase liability insurance on a group basis. NLC recently sent a letter to 19 of the top insurance executives in the country urging them to work more closely with NLC in expediting Senate consideration of this legislation. Industry opposition to the legislation has intensified as a num- ber of amendments have been offered Which would significantly impair the ability of groups to form and operate under the Act. _ House risk retention bills— H.R.4301—Rep. Ron Wyden (D -Ore.); H.R. 4442—Rep. Norman Lent (R-N.Y.); and H.R. 4506—Rep. John LaFalce (D- N.Y.) are bottled up in the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Com- merce, Transportation, and Tourism un- der Chairman James Florio (D-N.J.). Ef- forts continue to expedite subcommittee, full committee, and full House consider- ation. Insurance reform legislation offered by Rep. John LaFalce (D-N.Y.) awaits com- mittee consideration. Sen. Paul Simon (D -Ill.) is expected to offer similar Senate legislation in the near future. ❑ This report was compiled by NLC's Office of Federal Relations under the direction of its director, Frank Shafroth, and assisted by ,staff, members Carol Kocheisen, Reggie Todd, Cynthia Pols, Victor A. Rojas and Leslie A. Wollack. , • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Eight KEEPING OF HORSES/FRED DELOSH A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses on Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh--Mr. Fred DeLosh has resided at 2'8'82 Sibley Highway since 1946., For a number of years he was allowed to keep and board horses on his property. His property was zoned agricultural; however, in recent years was rezoned from A-1 to R-1 by the City. Since Mr. DeLosh has not boarded horses in recent years, the property is :now zoned R-1, he is questioning whether he can have some type of permit that would allow him to market and sell the property with the usable stable and approval to board horses on his 14 acres. Enclosed on pages jf/ through /S13 is a copy of a letter from Mr. DeLosh and aerial photo that shows the outline of his property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide some direction to the City staff and Mr. DeLosh concerning his request. 2882 Sibley Hwy. Eagan Mn. 55121 May 27, 1986 Mr. Dale Runkle �— City Planner Eagan, Mn. Dear Mr. Runkle, Our family has owned and resided on our 14 acres off Hwy. 13 in north Eagan since 1946. The acreage was zoned agri- cultural but, in one of our occupational absences out of state, was rezoned R=1 without our knowledge. We have never attempted to return it to agricultural status. • We had horses for many years and built a stable to house them. This stable has been kept in good shape and is very use- able. The purpose of this letter is to ascertain that horses can again be kept on *he property even though it is zoned R-1 at present. This determination is especially important to our children, as heirs, and to us in the event that we sell said property, Here are some pertinent bits of information -- The stable is located out of sight in the bottom of a deep ravine. The ravine is heavily wooded and has a small spring fed creek flowing through it. ® The adjoining area Is sparsely settled with Highview Park on the east boundary of the property. I believe that approximately two thirds of affected adjoining property owners resided there when we kept horses. I am enclosing an aerial photo of the area and a topographic map to assist you and the council in its deliberations. Please return them to me._ A prompt decision would be deeply appreciated. Very t my yours, Fred De Losh /q/ PA Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Nine RESOLUTION/AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE B. Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee - At a recent meeting of the Airport Noise Committee a resolution was adopted opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at Minneapolis. - St. Paul International Airport. The Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the resolution referenced on pages _/f5 through /QZ:. . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the resolution opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at the Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport. r, CITY OF EAGAN _ RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE EXTENSION, OF RUNWAY 4/22 AT MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is proposing the extension of Runway 4/22at the Minneapolis -:St. Paul International Airport for the purpose of increasing the capacity of the preferential runway system configurations, and WHEREAS, the MAC has proposed as an integral ,part of such an extension a southerly turn procedure for a significant proportion of the air traffic departing Runway 22, and WHEREAS, the MAC has asserted but has not conclusively proven the benefit of such southerly-tu-rn-to-thezesidents of Bloomington and Richfield most affected by the runway extension, and WHEREAS, the headings suggested by the MAC for such a. procedure would approach 170 degrees, and WHEREAS, aircraft using such headings and diverting from them will tend to overfly large portions of the City of Eagan at altitudes well below and at frequencies well above those currently experienced by the community, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has aggressively planned for noise compatible land uses where it has anticipated the presence of aircraft overflights, and WHEREAS, such land uses are not existent or planned in the areas to be most severely impacted by the addition of a.southerly heading.procedure from Runway 22, and WHEREAS, the Eagan -Mendota Heights boundary currently absorbs about one-half of all arrivals and departures at MSP and the addition of more low -altitude overflights will add further to this disproportionate impact and place an undue burden on the area, and WHEREAS, the extension of Runway 4/22 has the potential to increase the operational• capacity of Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport by allowing departures to the southwest without minimizing the capacity for departures over south Minneapolis, 'NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan opposes the Runway 4/22 extension as currently proposed including the southerly turn procedure and that the MAC not proceed with plans for its implementation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan insist that the MAC, in carrying out its noise abatement strategy to concentrate the most noise on the fewest people, acknowledge that such noise is an adverse environmental impact resulting from the conduct of airport business and that the MAC adopt a policy of conducting Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for procedural changes as well as capital improvements so that objective standards of proof and public process may supplant presumptions of costs and benefits in MAC decisions affecting airport neighbors, and—.... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City of Eagan requests that the MAC, through its EIS process, study fully the projected impacts of the Runway 4/22 extension and the southerly turn -procedure as separate and unique changes with separate and unique impacts such that their costs and benefits not be comingled or misunderstood and that the MAC recognize as invalid for comparison those data compiled during the two year test of the Burnsville Turn since such information was gathered using take -off points and flight tracks unique from those currently proposed. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL BY: Its Mayor ATTEST: Its Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: r Those in Favor: Those Opposed: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled on this day of , 1986. E -.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan / �4 2 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS Item 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Road) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received for the upgrading. of Wescott Roadf om Lexington Avenue to one-half mile east. Enclosed on page/? is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the Engi- neer's Estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on March 19, 1986. All bids will be checked for accuracy with a formal bid award recommendation being provided by the Public Works Director at the Council meeting on June 17. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-13 (Wescott Road') and award the contract to the lowest., responsible bidder. /d , Our File No. 49381 WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS M.S.A_.P. NO. 195-106-04 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-13 CITY PROJECT NO. 467 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986 NO CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Northdale Construction $456,053.50 2. Ceca Utilities 460,429.70 3. Lake Area Utility 472,406.33 ® 4. GL Contracting 516,209.20 Engineer's Estimate ---------------- $427,000.00 Feasibility Report Est. 492„330.00 % Over Engineer's Estimate +6.8% o Under Feasibility Report Estimate -7.4% NO Agenda Information Memo June 17, 19&6, City Council Meeting Page Forty -One PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued) Item 2. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids Award Contract (Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addi- tion. Enclosed on pageJCd is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bid the Engineer's Estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 20, 1986. All bids will be checkedfor accuracy with the formal bid award recommendation being provided by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 Council meeting. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-16 (Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. • • Our File No. 49390 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-16 EAGAANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 474 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS 1. 0.& P Contracting 2. Lake Area Utility 3. Northdale Construction 4. Nodland Associates 5. G.L. Contracting 6. L & G Rehbein ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----------------- Feasibility Report Estimate % Over Engineer's Estimate 8 Under Feasibility Report Estimate /90 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C_D.S.T. BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $215,684.85 219,307.30 222,458.50 232,498.00 237,273.76 243,439.50 $210,000.00 233,900.00 +2.7% -7.8% Agenda InformationMemo, June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty -Two PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (.continued) Item 3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract ('Sperry Consolidation Facility) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received for the installation of internal access roads and utilities to service the proposed Sperry consolidation facility to be financed by tax increment funds. Enclosed on page /q7/ is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the Engineer's Estimate. Due to the fact that this is financed through tax increment funds, there was no formal feasibility report estimate prepared. All bids will be checked for accuracy and a recommendation for formal contract award will ® be provided by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract '86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility) and award the con- tract to the lowest responsible bidder. A /V CITY OF EAGAN Bid Opening PROJECT: Sperry Consolidation Facility Utility and Street Improvements City Contract No. 86-17 BID DATE: Friday, June 13, 1986' BID TIME: 11:00 A.M. C.S.T. Name of Bidder Total Base Bid is 1. Northdale Construction $448,234.05 2. Ceca Utilities 450,195.00 3. G.L. Contracting 508,788.90 4. J. P. Norex, Inc. 530,111.99 5. Nodland Construction 552,046.50 Engineer's Estimate---------------- $471,534.75 % Under Engineer's_Estimate -5 % Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty -Three PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued) Item 4. Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Daniel Drive) --Contract 86-18 provides for the upgrading of Daniel Drive with streets and utilities under Project 475 as necessary to service the proposed Northview Meadows 2nd Addi- tion. This project was approved at a public hearing held on June 17. This contract also incorporates the trunk watermain installation interconnecting the City's high and intermediate pressure zones through the proposed Rahncliff 1st Addition under Project 468. Because there are no assessments associated with this trunk water installation, there was no formal public hearing. However, ® the feasibility report was presented to the Council for their review and approval at the May 21 Council meeting. • All easements necessary for the installation of these proposed improvements will be dedicated with the respective subdivisions which are anticipated to be completed prior to formal contract award. Our consulting engineer and Director of Public Works will be available to discuss the details associated with these proposed improvements at the June 17 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and order advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on June 27, 1986. /93 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty -Four 5 YEAR COUNTY HIGHWAY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS D. Five Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects --Very shortly, Dakota County will be reviewing and updating their Five - Year CIP for highway improvements. They have requested each community to review their ,previously approved Five -Year CIP to reaffirm the proposed schedule and to identify any additional projected county improvements that may be required that have not been previously identified or included. Enclosed on pages iqs through -96 is the county Five -Year CIP, identifying both the existing scheduled improvements (Part A) and additional needs anticipated by proposed future development and population growth.. With the county wanting to establish a firm program of future county road improvements for proper advance planning, they want to be assured that the City agrees with the schedule and is willing to commit its resources to make these joint projects a reality. At the May 21 Council meeting,, the Council directed staff to evaluate potential future signalization needs th-roughout the city. Enclosed on page '`'`F is a map of the city showing existing signals and future signals. All of the future signals have been identified on the county Five -Year CIP program previously discussed. Several of these signals will be installed as a part of the related county road improvement and others would be by separate contract installation. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail any questions regarding any of the information presented under this item at the June 17 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: request for county road improvements. i9�z Prepare a Five -Year CIP • ® DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY 5 YEAR C.I.P. A. SCHEDULED EST. CITY YEAR CO. RD. NAME LOCATION TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT COST 1986• 26 Lone Oak Road at Lexington Avenue Signal 25,000 1986 28 Yankee Doodle T.H. 13 to Federal Dr. 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 900,000 1986 28 Yankee Doodle I -35E to Lexington 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 762,000 1986 32 Cliff Road T.H. 3 to Inver Grove 2 Lane Grading & Base 28,000 --=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Heights 1987 31 Pilot Knob I -35E to Rebecca Lane 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 1,650,000 1987 32 Cliff Road Pilot Knob to Johnny 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 650,000 Cake 1987 32 Cliff Road T.H. 3 to Inver Grove 2 Lane Paving 11,000 Heights v` 1987 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32 Cliff Road at Rahn Road Signal 75,000 1988 26 Lone Oak at Eagandale Blvd Signal 75,000 1988 32 Cliff Road at Blackhawk/Galaxie Signal 40,000 1988 43 Lexington Ave. Yankee Doodle to Diffley 4 Lane Reconstruction 840,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1989 26 Lone Oak Lexington to T.H. 55 4 Lane Reconstruction 525,000 1989 30 Diffley Pilot Knob to I -35E. 4 Lane Reconstruction 575,000 1989 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 Diffley at Blackhawk Signal 40,000 1990 31 Pilot Knob Rebecca to Apple Valley 4 Lane Reconstruction 450,000 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL $6,646,000 *Delay Proposed by County to Later Year B. ADDITIONAL NEEDS EST. EST. CITY YEAR CO. RD. NAME LOCATION TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT COST 1987 28 Yankee Doodle at Denmark Signal 40,000 1987 31 Pilot Knob at Duckwood Signal 50,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1988 28 Yankee Doodle Lexington to T.H. 149 4 Lane Reconstruction 850,000 1988 31 Pilot Knob at Corporate Center Dr. Signal 60,000 1988 31 Pilot Knob at I-494 Ramps Signal 10,000 1988------ 31------ Pilot at Towerview Rd. Signal 50,000 �bl�l -Knob --- 1989 31 Pilot Knob at Deerwood Signal 45,000 1991 30 Diffley at Lexington Avenue Signal 50,000 1991 30 Diffley at Daniel Drive Signal 50,000 1991 30 Diffley Lexington to T.H. 3 4 Lane Reconstruction 1,300,000 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL $2,505,000 GRAND TOTAL 5 YEAR NEEDS $9,151,000 0 77IAsv&ng A MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 13, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION At our Management By Objectives session held this past winter, there was a brief discussion regarding future reorganization within the Fire Department that would provide for full-time administration. With the recent announcement by Bob Childers that he is retiring, effective July 6, as the volunteer Fire Chief, it is timely that an organizational review and budget .analysis be provided for consideration later this summer when the 1987 budget is developed. A memo was prepared, a copy is enclosed on pages ?0/ through 70Y ,that formally notifies the Fire Department that organizational changes to the Fire Administration will be given consideration this summer, during the development of the 1987 budget. VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Recently there has been discussion at City Council meetings concern- ing the number of variances that are processed for building construction within the community. Approximately every other meeting the City Council receives one or two variance requests and there has been a growing philosophy that variances be dis- couraged, if at all possible, by the City staff. City staff has typically and will continue to discourage variances and even work closer with builders and developers to emphasize that variances are 'for hardships and there is a .reason why a plat is approved with certain lot sizes and dimensions. I asked Administrative Assistant Hohenstein to research the number of variances for residential permits that have been issued over the last 4-5 years and determine what that relationship is to the number of permits issued. Because Eagan is one of the leading communities in the state in terms of building construction and activity there will obviously be more variances. Enclosed on page 203 is a copy of a memo that provides a table illustrating the number of variances and the relationship to residential permits and some additional comments about the staff's review of variances. The City Administrator has sent a letter to all developers and builders discourag-in,q the use of variances, which is also attached on page/ 20 PARK BENCHES You will notice that two (2) park benches have been installed in front of the Municipal Building. Approximately thirty-five of these benches are being placed throughout various parks within our community. Our Park Maintenance Division is pouring the concrete and constructing the park benches. /W AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE At the May _21 City Council meeting, Mayor Blomquist informed the City Council that a meeting had been held with the admini- strative staff from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant. The purpose of the meeting was to create an informational network to review odor problems that are emitted from the Seneca (Plant and further to review with the MWCC a program to minimize those odors and improve air quality over the 'western part of our,community. As Mayor Blomquist indicated at that City Council meeting, if you have names of persons who are residing in the west side of Eagan who might be interested in serving on this informal air quality task force please let this office know and they will be, invited to committee meetings. Attached is a copy of a press release that was prepared by the MWCC regarding the Air Quality Task Forced .The first meeting was held at 4:30 p.m. yesterday and several concerned citizens who were made aware of this meeting did attend. The next meeting is scheduled for 7:00 'p.m., July 17, at which time a tour of the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant will be conducted for those residents attending the Ai'r Quality Task Force meeting. Members of the Council are certainly welcome to attend and will be kept advised of any and all meetings. Attached on page 4p is a copy.of a list of names of those persons who were in attendance at the Task Force meeting. NATURAL GAS FIRE DEMONSTRATION Enclosed on page M 1 is correspondence from People's Natural Gas regarding a Nat ral Gas fire demonstration that will be sponsored by their company on June 24.. The Eagan Fire Department will be participating. MAY REPORT FOR PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS Enclosed on pages W ff through Q/O is a copy of the May report for Protective Inspections. CORRESPONENCE/MRS. DON SANDBERG Enclosed on pages 2// through y/7i is correspondence from Mrs. Don Sandberg regarding an interest in selling their property to the City for passive/active parkland. The letterwill be sent to the Parks and Recreation Director for Commission review: CORRESPONDENCE/ROBERT FERGUSON Enclosed is a letter to Mayor Blomquist from Bob Ferguson, Principal of Northview Elementary Schoold, ;commending the Eagan Police Department and Officer Larry Billmeyer for the bicycle safety program. CORRESPONDENCE/APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Enclosed is a copy of a letter to Fire Chief Childers and copied to the City Council from the City of Apple Valley, thanking the Fire Department for a recent mutual aid call. P. Z/f,, SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY PLANTS Enclosed on pages Al,`5, through z/ is a copy of a press release from the Metropolitan Council regarding an update on the solid waste resource recovery plants that are currently being planned by Twin City area counties. Action that was taken by Dakota county for their waste energy plant is discussed in this article._ BLUE BELL ICE CREAM OPERATION Enclosed is a letter from ,a representative of Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc., asking for reconsideration by the City Council to allow the ice cream men/women to sell ice cream from a truck throughout neighborhoods in the City of Eagan during summer months. If the City Council is interested in changing the ordinance, copies of the correspondence that was rovided by Blue Bell can be made available for your. review. A, i d 4Lzi /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 40 M MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT IiOHENSTEIN DATE: JUNE 10, 1986 SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION CONCERNING VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Pursuant to your request, I have compiled data for the last five -and -one-half years which consider variance requests as a function of the residential permits which might give rise to them. As you can see by the table which is shown below, variance requests have remained a relatively stable three to four percent of the R-1, R-2 and R-3 building permit totals over the past several years. While not all of ,these variances were granted, a. sizable number of them were approved based on their own merits. It appears that a certain percentage of the residential building activity will result in circumstances for which individuals will • request variances and the current) number of requests is a result of the phenomenal growth level we are experiencing. 1981 198 .,2 1983 1984 19:85 1986 YTD RESIDENTIAL PERMITS 358 392 .659 789 855 469 (R-1, R-2, R-3) VARIANCE REQUESTS 16 10 18 31 24 15 REQUESTS AS PERCENT 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 OF REQUESTS In addition, the protective inspections department indicates that an average of five to ten potential variance situations per month • are recognized and corrected at' the plan check or foundation permit stage. This means that roughly seventy-five percent of the potential variance requests are caught and corrected without requir- ing a formal variance application. A letter has been prepared for the City Administrator's signature which requests additional attention to this matter on the part of developers and builders. Hopefully this will reduce the number of variance requests still further. A inistrative Assistant JH/mc zo3 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P,0. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE, (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN June 11, 1986.JAMES A. SMITH VAC ELLSON THEODORE WACHTER Coun ll Members THOMAS HEDGES s CIN P minislralor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE The City of Eagan continues to experience an exceptional leveiler,0f growth in both its residential and business communities. Last year, the City had the most building permits of any city in the state. This year we are ahead of that pace. The City intends to continue to foster positive development, but the City Council has expressed concern about two specific side-effects of this growth. 1. Variances. - The City continues to receive a number of variance requests which do not represent true hardships justifying such action. Most often, they result from oversights in the survey or design of a project or an attempt to maximize floor area on a limited lot size. The Council has issued a strong statement that it does not support variances of convenience and that the condi- tions which give rise to such requests should be antici- pated and corrected ahead of time. Variances exist to allow flexibility for demonstrated hardships. 2. Weed Control - City ordinance requires that weeds/grass not be allowed to grow higher than 12" in height, or have gone to seed or are about to go to seed upon any platted or residential lot. It is the duty of the owner to remove or cut such weeds. The City has received an alarming number of complaints this year regarding weeds on vacant lots and asks that developers keep these areas in suitable, maintained conditions. The City Council and staff would appreciate your continued atten- tion to these matters. We enjoy a high degree of quality develop- ment and the little extra work on such details helps preserve the quality of the whole community. If you have any questions on these issues please feel free to contact the City staff. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/mc ao�Z THE LONE OAK TREE . THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY r.rt MEMO TO: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 10, 1986 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR CHANGES IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION Since May 30 when you unofficially announced your retirement from the EaganVolunteer Fire Department and then more formally in a letter received yesterday, it became appropriate to consider alternatives for the future structure of our fire administration. As you recall, at our late winter management by objectives session, there was discussion by the City Council regarding the hiring of full-time, Fire personnel. Positions that were discussed at that time included a IFire Chief and/or Fire Marshal. There was no formal consideration; however, it'was generally agreed that during the development of the 1987 budget there would be some consideration given to full-time administrative staffing in the Fire Department. The Fire Department is caught in the world of complexities such as administrative practices, insurance liabilities, facility and. . manpower planning and all the other considerations that must be given to a growth community. Our part-time Fire Marshal is no longer able to monitor all commercial, industrial and multifamily buildings throughout the City for proper fire prevention or thoroughly review all fires that occur within the City during the calendar year. Demands are increasing with all facets of fire administration as the community grows. I applaud you and your officers for the time and commitment you have given to our Volunteer Fire, Department. Any consideration and review of full-time staffing should only reflect the • preservation of continuing a job well done and an effort to meet the demands of the future. It is my understanding that District Chief Schindeldecker is considered your assistant chief and will be acting in the capacity of Fire Chief upon your official retirement July 6. It is also my understanding that traditionally the volunteer Fire Chief is elected by the Department and those elections are held in November/December every three (3) years. Recognizing that we are currently in a transition between your administration and a new volunteer Fire Chief, it seems appropriate by the City Council and this office that the City exp.lore all staffing options and review as a part of'the 1987,budget preparation, alternatives that might best suit the Volunteer Fire Department as we consider our future administrative staffing in that department. It is my intention to survey otherjcommunities of comparable size and ask how their fire administration and fire marshal services '201 a are staffed within their departments. A report will be prepared and input provided by your administrative officers during the month of July as budget considerations are furthur developed for review and.consideration by the City Council. Reorganization and change are two of the most feared words in the English vocabulary. Please stress to your fire administration that an organizational review for the future is no reflection on their capability as officers of the Fire Department. It is actually to the contrary and considered to be of a support nature to the Fire Department by the mere fact that the City Council may determine that full-time staffing is necessary in order, to continue and improve upon a level of service that to date has been provided by the volunteerism of our department. I will stay in touch with you, and certainly after July 6 with Dick, relating to the future of the fire administrative staff. Please remember that the City Council has had only a brief discussion at a management by objectives session and as a ® collective body has not had any deliberations or discussion regarding future administrative staffing of the Fire Department. All the information that this office will compile is considered fact finding and will be presented in a report form. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. r Sincerely, 1vZ61 . d Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Honorable Mayor S City Councilmembers Dick Schindeldecker, Assistant Fire Chief/District Chief Ken Southorn, District Chief TLH/kf ROUGH DRAFT PRESS RELEASE EAGAN AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE METROPOLITAN NTE CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF EAGAN FORM AIR Q`11ALITY TASK FORCE ST. PAUL, June 9, 1986 -- The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and the City of Eagan have announced the formation of a task force designed to improve air quality in Eagan. The Eagan Air Quality Task Force will investigate MWCC and Eagan citizens' concerns about the odors that have been present for the past several summers in the Minnesota River Valley near MWCC's Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant (3750 Plant Road, Eagan).- MWCC agan). MWCC and Eagan official's have been working together for the past several .months to improve air quality. The Seneca Plant staff recently made a number of process changes to help control any odors emanating from the plant, and odor control systems similar to those used successfully by Duluth's wastewater treatment facility were put into operation late this spring. t An expansion of the Seneca Plant is scheduled to begin in the next two to three years, and the task force will also examine the potential impact of the expansion on Eagan air quality. more 0-51 t EAGAN TASK FORCE Page 2 The mayor of Eagan, Bea Blomquist, and the manager of the Seneca Plant, Jim Wawra, have mailed letters to more than 50 concerned citizens, businesses and local officials inviting them to serve on the task force. -fha )eider Boys in part, "The management of the Seneca Plant is working with the City of Eagan on the formation of an Eagan Air Quality Task Force 6ay the lettms. "you have been selected as a neighboring resident who may have an interest in serving on this committee to work with the Seneca staff in discussing concerns, monitoring problems and recomIknding potential solutions." ® An informational meeting of the task force is scheduled to take \1 lace Thursday, June 12, at 4:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall. The participants will discuss the current situation at the Seneca Plant, air quality in Eagan and the plans for plant expansion. They will also make plans for a future tour of the Seneca Plant. -30- 1 Z.66 �A�Ao AIQ QuAL�ry 'rhsK FoQC� vhT�, %i ipp PEOPLES NATURAL GAS June 2, 1986 Mr. Lowell Bahrke, Training Officer Eagan Fire Department 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Natural Gas Fire Demonstration 'Dear Lowell: 3958 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, Minnesota 55122 612-454-6080 Sometime ago, Chief Childers and you expressed an interest in sending some of your department members to a natural gas fire demonstration. We at Peoples Natural Gas Company combined with Northern Natural Gas Company are pleased to invite your group to a training session to be held on Tuesday, June 24, at 6:30 P.M. at the Northern Natural Gas Company compressor station at Farmington (note enclosed location map). Fire departments participating are Eagan, Rosemount, Farmington, Cannon Falls, Lakeville, New Market and Webster. The demonstrations are designed to familiarize your fire fighters with the basics of natural gas, what to do when there is a fire involving natural gas, and techniques of extinguishing fires involving natural gas (both with hose streams and chemical extinguishers). The types of fires fire fighters will be experiencing are natural gas fueled, discharging from an open pipe horizontally and vertically. Also included will be fires simulating line hits and stored flammable liquid fuels involved in natural gas fueled fires. 40 It should be advised in advance to all fire fighters planning to participate in the actual demonstrations that full turn -out gear will be required. Upon completion of the training session, a lunch will be served at the site. We would appreciate your response by June 16 as to the number of fire fighters attending. Should you have any questions please contact me at 454-6080 or Mark Adelmann with Northern Natural Gas Company in Farmington at 463-7126. e�ly, R eh H. Loca Manager RHL:dlo Enc. cc: /Thomas Hedges, Eagan City Administrator Jay Berthe, Eagan Chief of Police G.F. Lovell, District Manager, Peoples Natural Gas, Farmington, MN 0. C. Reimer, District Manager, Northern Natural Gas, Farmington, MN ?D7 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 152 615 Electrical Plumbing 177 145 692 554 RVAC 137 578 Water Softener 28 134 Signs $ 31,331.50 $ 15,665.75 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank n n 1 40 4-11 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED unvrm: v rM. TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 3 FOUNDATION 0 380 SINGLE FAMILY 80 $ 6,984,000 $ 31,331.50 $ 15,665.75 $ 176 18 DUPLEX 4 298,000 1,426.00 713.00 8,626.0 91 TOWNHOUSE 32 1,791,000 9,593.00 4,796.50 65,989.0 7 CONDO 1 778,000 2,128.00 1,064.00 24,893.(: 0 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 9 COMMERCIAL 3 985,000 3,111.00 1,555.75 26,185.7 21 COMM/IND REMODEL 5 201,600 956.5b 415.75 .1,473.7 2 COMM/IND ADDITION 2 78,000 426.50 213.25 7g 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 320,000 983.00 .491.50 8,908.5 ' 9 RES. GARAGES 4 22,900 226.00 --- 238.0 11 RES. ADDITIONS 2 20,000 161.00 58.25 229.2 4 SWIM POOL 4 36,900 304.00 55.25 402:7 57 MISCELLANEOUS 14 56,000 645.50 83.50 762.5 0 DEMOLISH 0 HOUSE MOVES 615 TOTALS 152 11,571,400 51,292.50 25,112.50 315,183.01 YEAR-TO-DATE 57,514,650 235,693.Ob 115,578.70 1,484,836.9 rM. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY.REPOBT DATE MAY 1986 MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN TYPE # OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF I UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 4 2 4 $ 298,000 $ 1,426.00 $; 149.00 $ 713.00 $ 8.,626.00 4-PLEX 32 8 32 1,791,000 9,593.00 895.50 4,796.50 65,989.00 6-PLEX L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R 7-PLEX 3595 KRESTWOOD LN STAN SCHULTZ 180,000 633.00 90.00 316.50 6,421.50 COMM/NEI 8-PLEX 1 RST M'HAHA APT. BLDG 1380 DUCKWOOD DR K CHARLES DEV 650,000 1,808.00 325.00 904.00 12,927..00 COMM/NEI 16 -UNIT 1 1 16 778,000 2,128.00 389.00 1,064.00 24,893.00 TOTALS 37 11 52 2,867,000 13,147.00 1,433.50 6,573.50 99,508.00 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 11912 1275 TOWN CENTRE DR BURGER KING $ 155,000 $ 670.50 $ 77.50 $ 335.25 6,837.25 COMM/NEI L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R 11934 3595 KRESTWOOD LN STAN SCHULTZ 180,000 633.00 90.00 316.50 6,421.50 COMM/NEI 1 RST M'HAHA 11992 1380 DUCKWOOD DR K CHARLES DEV 650,000 1,808.00 325.00 904.00 12,927..00 COMM/NEI L 1 B 1 EAGAN CONV CTR 12022 3945 LEXINGTON AVE SO ADVENT UNITED 320,000 983.00 160.00 491.50 8,908.50 P.F./NEI L 1 B 1 ADVENT UNITED METH. CHURCH 11982 4215 NICOLS RD JIM PERSONS 65,000 328.00 32.50 164.00 524.50 COMM/ADI L 2, B 25, SECT 30 11905 3323 RIVER BLUFF DR TORCHWOOD 13,000 98.50 6.50 49.25 154.25 COMM/AD] L 12, B_l, ROBERT KARATZ PROPERTIES 11877 3340 PILOT KNOB RD AM. ASSOC. OF 25,500 175.00 13.00 87.50 275.50 COMM/REI L 6, B 3, EFFRESS ADD CEREAL CHEM. 11993 2600 EAGAN WOODS DR EAGAN WOODS 12,700 98.50 6.50 49.25 154..25 COMM/REI L 1. B 1 EAGAN WOODS LAND LTD PTNE 22996 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 5,400 56.50 3.00 --- 59.50 COMM/RE! L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 ' _h'+{Ya•o-L :.. �!T.ev-.. 4.-NW.aT .� .:. ene'-. ..: •.:: .- ._ �A, -- . ..:: -:........ MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: MAY 1985 C NUMHER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS N VALUATIONS W P N P W W 4 -UNIT O O W O T0WNHOUSE 32 8 32 1,798,000 9,646.00 899.00 4,827.00 67,368.0, 6 -UNIT 1270 EAG AN INp ND bl TOWNHOUSE NO IN NW MTL LIFE 1600 000 4,183.00 800.00 2,091.50 27 129.50 COMM 8 -UNIT 1243 EACAN IND RD LEXINGTON TOWNHOUSE L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1 P r 108.00 Y O O A (1 r r m O a T ri 10,683.00 2,100.00 •-1 Y .� T i 2 m r [al O O y t' y r CA i 36 2,008,000 m 1,004.00 5,404.00 71,217.0 V! r F r ti L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P H i 36.000 220.00 H 110.00 348.00 COMM 1253 EAC IND RD 10236 2..AC CTR IND MJS SYSTEMS 45,000 260.50 22.50 130.25 40.25 W W 10252 L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM 20 P C O 324.00 2,781.00 O O O C O P � N C N I I W O y W 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 'm N _ C P W N m m c C m 0 0 o O o 0 o m 9 W N c 1 1 C m _ 1 u 1 I I I C W T N O U O O m 0 N P O O W W u O C •O � 1 I I P .WO W � c c 0 0 o T m 0 0 o m MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: MAY 1985 BUILDING NUMBER NUMHER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES I CILIRCE FEES TOTAL FEES 4 -UNIT 4955 PILOT KNOB RD T0WNHOUSE 32 8 32 1,798,000 9,646.00 899.00 4,827.00 67,368.0, 6 -UNIT 1270 EAG AN INp ND bl TOWNHOUSE NO IN NW MTL LIFE 1600 000 4,183.00 800.00 2,091.50 27 129.50 COMM 8 -UNIT 1243 EACAN IND RD LEXINGTON TOWNHOUSE L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1 723.00 108.00 361.50 1,192.50 COMM APT. OR 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD CONDO L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100 FED LAND CO 4,200,000 10,683.00 2,100.00 5,341.50 51,415.50 COMM 2-PLEX 4 2 4 210,000 1,162.00 105.00 581.007,849.00` TOTALS 36 10 36 2,008,000 10,808.00 1,004.00 5,404.00 71,217.0 BUILDING PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK PERMIT 8 ADDRESS 4 LEGAL OWNER VALUATIONS FEE CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUr., 10191 4955 PILOT KNOB RD B 78 .F ION 33 T. JEPPESF.N 22,000 3 152.50 11.00 76.25 239.75 ACRIC 1270 EAG AN INp ND bl 10199 NO IN NW MTL LIFE 1600 000 4,183.00 800.00 2,091.50 27 129.50 COMM 10206 1243 EACAN IND RD LEXINGTON L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1 723.00 108.00 361.50 1,192.50 COMM 10209 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100 FED LAND CO 4,200,000 10,683.00 2,100.00 5,341.50 51,415.50 COMM 4175 LEXB54INGTOSF.CTN 7 AVE2J 10216 L NW BELL TELF.P 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM 10235 4178 KNOB DRIVE L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P NOSTALGIC HOME i 36.000 220.00 18.00 110.00 348.00 COMM 1253 EAC IND RD 10236 2..AC CTR IND MJS SYSTEMS 45,000 260.50 22.50 130.25 40.25 COMM 2109 CLIFF RD 10252 L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM FED LAND CO 186,000 648.00 93.00 324.00 2,781.00 COMM LJ1l u I — I<c3p(=>sia .Kerir)els GERMAN SHORTHAIRED POINTERS Puppies - Grown Dogs - Stud Service Eagan City Council 3830 Pilot Knob ad Eagan, MN 55122 Gentlemen: 1560 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MINN. 55121 454.503) — A..A Coo. 612 June 7, 1'986 I have just come home from a run through beautiful Eagan and am moved to write to thank whoever has instituted the system of ® Bike paths.. .Eagan or Dakota County...... with a request to please continue the system. It is a relief to be able to run off the roads whenever possible. I look forward to more bike paths being developed as time goes by. Another thank you to Eagan for the development of so many parks and "green spaces". As our city grows I believe it is very im- portant to coninue to add green space as a buffer for the many housing developments going up. This morning I ran by the new Blue Cross -Blue Shield Neighborhood 'ark which is being developed, and then I ran through Black Hawk Park, on the newly -mowed trail How beautifull Wonderful hill -climbing work, too, for this runner! In this vein, I would like our leaders to consider yet another green space: We own eight acres of land on Yankee Doodle Rd., bordered on the east by Surrey Heights and on the west by the Eagan Water Treatment facility. On our eight acres is a duck pond and it is surrounded by beautiful wooded grounds. Our house is, we believe , one of the pioneer farmhouses in Eagan (our deed reads 1890) and when we moved here in 1956 to Eagan Township, was known as "The Old Heimel Place". Yankee Doodle was a narrow dirt country lane and there was nothing else out here except a few farms. One cannot stop progress, however, and now Eagan is a busy growing progressive city. Our back pasture (Dr. Lyle Hay's land) has been sold and is being developed now for individual homes.. . It has occurred to us that it might be very smart of Eagan to set aside this picturesque chunk of land as green space -park, for the en- joyment of all the people who presently live in Surrey Heights and will be living in the new development in the back pasture. Walking "nature trails" could be developed, and picnic areas here and there. The house could possibly be maintained as a pioneer farmhouse...... When a it stop breeding better dogs -- You stop breeding good dogs or removed to make way for more useable space along the Yankee Doodle, Rd. segment. If Eagan would be interested in seeing our land and/or talking about it, we will be pleased to hear from you. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely yours, C - Mrs. D Sandberg INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 19.6 14445 DIAMOND PATH ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 June 5, 1986 Mayor Bea Blomquist City Hall " 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY ■ROBERT E. FERGUSON 454-4134 Dear Mayor Blomquist, In behalf of the students and the faculty at Northview School, I would like • to express our deep gratitude to the Eagan Police Department for furnishing us with Officer Larry Billmeyer and his Intern Officer for our Bicycle Safety Program. It was extremely successful even if we did have rain on the first day. We resumed the program on the following Monday morning and completed it on that day. For the past four years that we have had this program at Northview School we have not experienced any fatal accidents of students who have been in this program. _I think it is a fantastic program. I would like to compliment Officer Billmeyer and Police Chief Jay Berthe for cooperating with us in this community endeavor. I would also like to thank the Eagan Police Department for the School Patrol picnic that they sponsored. It was just outstanding to have the local Police Department work so closely with the schools and the school patrol, thus making it possible for our studentsto arrive and leave school as safely as possible. Sincerely, Robert E. Fergua`on d/6 APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE CHIEF 14200 Cedar Avenue Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 June 3, 1986 Fire Chief Bob Childers Eagan Fire Department 3800 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Chief Childers, Once again I would like to offer our sincere thanks to your department for responding to our mutual aid call for help. Yesterday, June 2, our department was in Rosemount helping their department fight a structure fire. The call required our department to utilize all our rigs and manpower, which left Apple Valley without fire -,coverage. Thanks to your department we felt secure in the knowledge that your dedicated firefighters could and would respond to our mutual aid call. Again, thank you cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Richard W. Tuthill Fire Chief It XC: Eagan City Council'/ • r. c... immediate Release: REPRINTED FROM JUNE METRO MONITOR For more information contact the Public Information Office 612/291.6464 Sen Reddick 291-6422 Five Solid Waste Resource Recovery Friday, Plants Now Planned for Region May 30; 1986 This year, and for every year in recent memory, 95 percent of the region's trash will be hauled to landfills to be unceremoniously buried. is That's about to change. Five big solid waste resource recovery plants are currently being planned by Twin Cities Area counties and private firms. Together, the plants will be capable of handling more than 4,000 tons of trash every day, or about 72 percent of the region's trash. Last month Dakota County decided'to build a waste -to -energy plant that --would process about 735 tons of'trash per day. The resource recovery company, P.L.M. Selberg's/Westinghouse, will own and operate the $90'million plant, to be"built in Rosemount: The project will house an operation to produce refuse - derived fuel (RDF) from trash, and boilers and generators to convert it into electrical energy... The project's fuel production will be accomplished with equipment made by Swentec, Inc., a Swedish firm. Westinghouse will burn the fuel and sell the electrical energy to Northern States Power Co. Dakota County decided against sending its garbage to a joint Ramsey/Washington County trash -to -energy plant in Newport, the region's only trash -processing plant currently under construction. The Ramsey/Washington plant, owned and operated by NSP, is scheduled to begin operation in the fall of 1987. The plant will take 1,000 ton�trash per day from the two counties and turn it into RDF. NSP will burn the RDF to produce electricity at its power plants in Red Wing and Mankato. Construction is projected to cost $31 million. Annual operating costs will range from $5 million to $7 million. The plant will recover materials such as iron and aluminum for recycling. Hennepin County plans to start construction of a third big plant, a $70 million garbage -burning plant to be located in downtown Minneapolis, in the spring of 1987. The plant, to be located at 5th St. N. and 6th Av. N., will burn 1,000 tons of trash per day beginning in 1990. The Hennepin plant, intended to greatly reduce the need for landfill space in the region, will get its trash from Hennepin County, excluding Minneapolis and three other cities (see Reuter project below). The trash will come from four "transfer stations," located throughout the county. Transfer stations are to be located in Bloomington, Brooklyn Park and Minneapolis. Last month the Hennepin County Board decided to look at locating the fourth transfer station in Eden Prairie instead of Hopkins. The Council is preparing a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the plant and transfer sites for the county. It will issue the EIS for public review June 129 and will vote on the adequacy of the study June 26. Reuter, Inc. has laid the footings for the region's fourth major resource recovery project. It's a $9 million effort in Eden Prairie that will -turn 400 tons a day of mixed municipal solid waste into fuel pellets. The plant, which will have an annual operating budget of $4 million, is expected to be up and running in October. Minneapolis is negotiating a contract with the company to provide 350 tons of trash per day. Hopkins, Minnetonka and Shorewood have agreed to provide another 50.tons per day. Reuter plans to turn at least half the waste it receives into combustible more v4 Pellets for sale to firms that currently burn coal or natural gas. About 15 percent of the waste will be glass, metals and plastics, which will be separated and recycled. In the second year of operation, the company plans to compost a portion of the residuals. The Council recommended approval of Reuter's facility permit request in March. "If Hennepin Council would give us the garbage, we'd like to build another 400 -ton -per -day plant in the: county," said James Reuter, vice president. "The county has a lot of garbage left that needs to find a home, but not in the ground." NSP will build, own and operate the region's f fth.resource recovery plant, ® with a capacity of 1,000 tons per day, in Sherburne.County.'s Elk. River. Trash will come from Anoka County and possibly more from Hennepin and other counties north and west of the seven -county region. The $53 million plant will produce RDF to be burned for electrical power primarily at United Power Assoc., a utility in Elk River. The plant, scheduled to begin operation in 1989, is expected to have an annual operating budget of $8.7 million. The -project will separate and recycle iron, aluminum and possibly other materials. Scott and Carver Counties are currently negotiating with firms to build a resource recovery plant to serve their areas. -30- a17 *(I1 a X11 )Iemi, , 3218 Snelling Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55406 - 61'1-729-5205 April 5, 1986 City Administrator Thomas Hedges t830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55121 Dear Mr. Hedges, For the past seven years the Blue Bell Ice Cream truck has been a summer companion to thousands of Eagan residents young and old alike. I am..writing this letter in the hope that I can convince the council to allow us to operate in Eagan once again. Late last summer I received a letter from the City explaininq that Eagan City Code,. sec. 9.15 —Prohibiting parking for the purpose of advertising or ceiling merchandise, was going to be strictly enforced. We complied with the request and did not operate after receiving the letter. We did however receive numerous calls (not just from children) inquiring as, to the Whereabouts of the "ice cream man". The point in the letter requesting we cease operation mentioned a safety hazard. We consider ourselves a very safety conscious company and train our drivers extensively with both written and slide safety programs. In support of our safety record I would like to present certain facts: We have operated in Eagan from approximately May ist through September 1st each year. The truck works an average of six days per week and sells an average of 200 ice cream bars per day. That means over our seven years of operation vie have sold about 150,000 ice cream bars. In all this time and with all those sales we have never had a single accident take place. I feel this is an excellent record and if we are allowed to operate again our commitment to safety will remain just as strong. I am enclosing a letter from our insurance carrier explaininq our limits of liability and our safety record. I am also enclosing the results of a recent Saturday afternoon survey we took in Eagan asking people if they wanted to have the ice cream truck back in their neighborhoods. I am happy to report that at least 98. of the people we asked said they saw no reason we should not be allowed to operate. In recent, years the cities of Richfield, St. Louis Park, Mound and Fridley have altered their ordinances to allow ice cream trucks. I am enclosing a copy of a letter from the city manager of Richfield explaining his experience with Blue Bell. (The letter was originally written to the city of St. Cloud in support of our application to vend there.) I am also enclosing copies of the altered ordinances from these cities in the hope they can be used as a model in Eagan. WI, W The Blue Feil truck has .also provided a welcome summer job, usuilly for an Eagan college student. In conclusion, we are asking that the council consider a way for the "ice cream man/women" to be able to come back to Eagan. We feel our record shows that we have been a responsible and safety conscious company. We also feel we have provided a desired service in a fun and positive manner. I would be happy to work with the city to develop a ordinance that would allow our operation. Thant: you for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely; r �n Glenn Baron Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc. '219 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN., MINNESOTA JUNE 17, 1986 C�1i�:V4tiZ�] i�i�►7 Item 1. O'Neil Vs City of Eagan CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Sncrease in Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit 2Za MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 16, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY Item 1. O'Neil vs. City of Eagan --City Attorney Hauge is planning to provide an update on the current status of the O'Neil vs. City of Eagan lawsuit. To date, Mr. O'Neil has not signed the letter of understanding between the City of Eagan and Mr. O'Neil that both parties will not proceed with depositions, discovery or any other findings related to the lawsuit until the Comprehensive Guide Plan update is completed. Enclosed on pages ZZy through is a copy of a resolution that the City Attorney would like to discuss with the City Council after the meeting on Tuesday., CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Increase in Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds --The City held public hearings and granted a multifamily housing revenue bond issued in the amount of $10,000,000.00 for the Thomas Lake Apartment Project. The devel- oper, Dominium Group, is requesting that the Inducement Resolution be changed to allow the amount of multifamily housing revenue bonds to increase from $10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00. Reasons for changing the amount of the Inducement Resolution are outlined in a letter from the Doninium Group and bond counsel, Holmes and Graven, found on pages laa through ZZ Any change in the resolution would require a public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a public hearing to be scheduled at the July 1 City Council meeting for the purpose of considering a change in the Inducement Resolution for the Thomas Lake Apartment that would increase the amount of bonds from 10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00. Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit --Enclosed is a memorandum from City Planner Runkle to the City Administrator regarding the Wachovia Indirect Source Permit. The City Administrator and City Planner would like to briefly review this permit with the City Council. p. ZZ 4 Z30, /s/Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 27-1 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN 1986 5-9-86 Draft Only WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council in early 1985 directed the City staff and consulting planner to commence the planning process in order to review the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan last prepared in 1980; and WHEREAS, the study was commenced in early 1985 by the staff consulting planner for a complete review of the Lana Use Guide, including residential, commercial and industrially designated areas; and WHEREAS, the statutory basis for the lana use planning within a statutory city is found in Minnesota Statutes Annotated 462.355 including provisions for adoption and amendment to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; and WHEREAS, an application was submitted to the City of Eagan by Robert O'Neil and Grace O'Neil for the rezoning from A -Agricultural, to PD-Plannea Development, for approximately 100 acres located in the south half of Section 10, north of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lexington Avenue and east of I -35E, which was first considered at a public hearing of the Advisory Planning Commission on May 28, 1985; and WHEREAS, John Voss, the Eagan Consulting Planner, aid in a memorandum to the City dated , 1985 suggest that the existing commercial - type zoning within the City may be adequate for future development at the current rate of commercial development within the City and as compared with the amount of zoning and development in other metropolitan area suburban municipalities; and v7� J WHEREAS, at the time of the application submittea by Robert O'Neil the zoning of the property was Agricultural and R-4, Multiple Residential, and the lana use designation provided for an R -III density allowing for six to twelve residential unite per acre; and WHEREAS, an action was brought by the O'Neils against the City on or about October 10, 1985 for specific relief, including a request that the City Council approve the rezoning of the property as requested; and WHEREAS, the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission submitted a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application and the Eagan City Council acted upon the application at its regular meeting on July 16, 1986; and WHEREAS, in September of 1985 the City Council scheduled a special ,joint meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council which first met on October 7, 1985 to commence the Comprehensive Guide update process and subsequently met as a ,joint committee on November 26, 1985, December 12, 1985, January 23, 1986 and March 11, 1986; and WHEREAS, prior to the action by the City Council on the application submitted by the O'Neils, the City Council indicated that it has initiated proceedings before the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council to review the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan last adopted in 1980 and the City has since that time continued to review the plan in detail; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the Comprehensive Guide review process including residential, commercial and industrial uses and proposed to the O'Neils that the action mentioned above be held in abeyance to allow the City to proceed with the Comp Guide review; and WHEREAS, the City Council at its regular meeting on March 19, 1986 adopted a resolution directing the staff and the Advisory - Planning Commission together with the Council to proceed with the Guide review process covering all ��3 applicable parcels and uses of land throughout the City subject, however, to the entry into a stipulation between Robert and Grace O'Neil and the City of Eagan providing for a 180 -day stay of the ,O'Neil civil action within which time the City will proceed with its.Comp Guide planning process including review and action of all commercial comprehensive guide planning within the City; and WHEREAS, there are numerous other parcels of property within the City that are designated commercial use in the Land Use Plan or proposed to be designated commercial use and it is necessary and expedient that the City proceed with the Comprehensive Guide process including the commercial portion of the Guide; and WHEREAS, the City Council has attempted in good faith with unanimous action at its March 19, 1986 meeting to proceed to resolve the action commenced by the O'Neils including the submission of the proposed stipulation based upon discussions with the attorney and representative of the O'Neils together with representatives of the City; and WHEREAS, although the O'Neils have not been willing to enter into a Stipulation for the Stay of Proceedings during the Comp Guide review process, the City Council has directed.the City representatives to meet and attempt to negotiate a stay of the proceedings in order to allow the Comprehensive Guide review to continue for the reasons that are described above; NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by seconded by , it was Resolved as follows: - 1. That the Eagan City Council hereby directs the staff and the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission, including the Council, to proceed with the Comprehensive Guide review process covering all applicable parcels and uses of land throughout the City, and further directs the planning consultant and Zz�( planning staff to provide appropriate studies and reports concerning the Comprehensive Plan. for review and ultimate action by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. Dated: Those in favor: Thoseagainst: ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By: By. E.J.an ver a e, .ler Beatta Blomquist, Mayor zz� 1 rruup incorporated 3140 HARBOR LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 6121559-1711 June 12, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: REQUEST TO REVISE INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR THOMAS LAKE APARTMENTS Dear Mr. Hedges: We respectfully request that we be allowed to advertise this week for a public hearing on July 1, 1986 to increase the previously approved Inducement Resolution on the above referenced project from $10,000,000.00 to $11,875,000.00. It is of critical importance that the public hearing be held at the regularly scheduled July 1, 1986 City Council meeting in order to accomplish a July 31, 1986 project closing date as required in our financing commitment. If the public hearing is held on July 1, 1986, we have to publish a notice prior to June 15, 1986. We are requesting that the Inducement Resolution be increased for several reasons. First and most importantly, we have been severely restricted in our ability to secure the types and sources of financing commitments that we had earlier contemplated using, because of the proposed changes being made by the Senate and Congress to our current tax laws. The financing commitment that we were able to secure requires that we incorporate within the project longer periods of capitalized interest thus increasing the total cost of the development. In addition, we have made significant improvements to the project in terms of amenities that will be provided to our residents directly and indirectly. We have spent considerable time in exploring ways to preserve larger areas of natural vegetation by utilizing greater amounts of retaining walls than we had initially proposed. The community facility has been greatly upgraded in terms of recreational amenities and size. Lastly, we have made significant improvements to the unit interiors by providing such extra amenities as European cabinets, microwaves, wood trim and paneled doors to mention a few items. 77-6 i June 12, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges Page Two Your cooperation in accommodating our request would be greatly appreciated. Barbara Portwood, our bond counsel at Holmes and Graven, has indicated that she will send you a procedural and time schedule that will outline those items that have to be completed in order to accommodate a July 31, 1986 closing date on this development. Please give me a call to discuss this issue further. Sincerely, AEB/sl E 0 zz7 BARBARA L. PORTWOOD Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9213 June 13, 1986 HOLMES & GRAVEN CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (612) 737-9700 Mr. Thomas Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: $10,000,000 City of Eagan Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds (Thomas Lake Apartments Project) Series 1986 Dear Mr. Hedges: Jack Safar, the developer of the above -referenced project has indicated to me that he is negotiating with a tax-exempt bond fund for the sale of the above -referenced bonds. Yesterday I spoke with the attorney for the fund who tells me that the bonds must be closed by July 31st in order to be purchased by the fund. A financing program for this project was approved by the City of Eagan and reviewed by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA") last year. However, because the developer proposes to increase the size of the issue to $11,875,000, the program must be amended following a public hearing for which notice must be published 15 days in advance. Following the public hearing the program must be submitted to MHFA and not rejected for 30 days. In order to meet these procedural requirements and close by July 31, 1986, notice would have to be published on Friday, June 13th or Saturday, June 14th and a public hearing would have to be held by the Eagan City Council on July 1st. The purpose for this letter is to request that a public hearing be scheduled for July 1 and to request your permission to cause notice of the public hearing (in the attached form) to be published. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me. Sincerely, Barbara L. Portwood BLP:ds cc: Jack Safar Armand Brachman Z2g' MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE DATE: JUNE 13, 1986 SUBJECT: WACHOVIA INDIRECT SOURCE PERMIT The purpose of .this memorandum is to convey activities surrounding the Wachovia Indirect Source Permit (ISP). This memorandum. will describe the purpose of an ISP and when a permit will be issued to Wachovia. Material contained herein is for your information, and I will continue to keep you informed as the ISP approval process proceeds. Project Description. In early 1986, Wachovia Bank and Trust Company of North Carolina purchased 267 acres of the Laukka-Beck planned development. The Wachovia site is located in the south and west one half of the Laukka-Beck planned development and situated south of Northwest Orient's Corporate Headquarters. It is anticipated that the Wachovia site will result in 3,376,510 square feet of mixed use commercial development with construction to commence in 1987 and conclude no later than the year 2020. Indirect Source Permit. An ISP is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) when a concentration of air polluting sources are attracted to a specific development site, and as a consequence will produce a significant increase in air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide and (CO emissions). The principal source of air pollutants in the case of Wachovia are automobiles, retail and commercial facilities, parking facilities and adjacent roadways. Based on air quality projections prepared by BRW Engineering, the Wachovia site will not exceed 8 -hr. average state standards for CO, though a permit is required by MPCA because the site will have more than 1,000 parking stalls. At present, the Wachovia ISP authorizes the construction of 2,296,510 square feet of mixed use commercial development through the year 2005 and specifically permits 11,732 parking spaces. A second Wachovia ISP will be required in the future to construct the remaining 1,080,000 square feet of mixed use commercial development which is planned to commence in the year 2005. ZZ� Memo to City Administrator Hedges June 13, 1986 Page 2 Current Activities. The Planning Department met with Suzanne Pelly of the MPCA in late April, 1986, for the purpose of reviewing an initial draft of the Wachovia ISP. Staff has continued to participate in negotiations with MPCA and Wachovia representatives for purposes of communicating the City's interests. The 30 day comment will begin in the near future and upon its conclusion an ISP will be issued to Wachovia by MPCA. Once this permit has been issued, Wachovia may begin construction activity. The Planning Department will continue to follow activities surround- ing the Wachovia ISP approval process and inform you when the permit has been issued by MPCA. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter. D2 \ City Planner DR/SS/hb 7 36 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JUNE 17, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF=ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35'- ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Fire Department �,5 B. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA A. Contractor Licenses 1z B. Personnel Items C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition ISD. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) E. 1986 Amusement Device Renewals �$ F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals .� o.IG. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals :Z1H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility o( -I. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Deerwood School Addition) �•_-�-J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (,Highview Avenue - Streets) ZL K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition) ::n L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition) D.20 M. Approve Final Plat, T.E.M. Addition ,i e.%DN. Approve Final Plat, Hampton Heights Addition t. V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (�•3 1A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City P.33 B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets & Utilities) P,s�{C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458, (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1, 1986, City Council Meeting 1 1 D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project ,471, (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1,, 1986, Meeting �j E. Public Hearing for Project 444R, (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm QSewer Outlet) VI. OLD BUSINESS 'A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development District X11 �? Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) Continued from May 21, 1986, City Council Meeting Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - Cul de Sac Reconsideration �p�D.. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign VII. NEW BUSINESS 0-'A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) for a Pylon Sign on Lot '2, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition Located Yankee Doodle Road, West of Pilot Knob Road, NE 1/4 of Section 16 B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE Quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Lot 1, Block 1, NE 1/4 of Section 16 C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard) from Setback Requirements for Expansion & Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE Quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road & Washington Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 16 k -:)5D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon Sign for an Office/Warehouse Located Silver Bell & Highway 13, SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 18 13$E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motec P Transmission) for a Pylon Sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition Located Cedarview Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 19 140F. Conditional Use Permit (R. Kaye Scheurenbrand) for a Commercial Boarding Kennel on Approximately 5.8 Acres Located South of A Cliff Road and East of Dodd Road, NE 1/4 of Section 36 G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life (Opus Corp) to Split Lot 18 and Combine the N 1/2 with Lots 19 & 20, Creating a new 4 -Acre Parcel Loacted North of Lone Oak Road on West Service Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, Part of SE 1/4 5 of Section 12 C,� fH. _Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD (Planned Development) to R-1 (Single Family Residential) for Approximately 111 Acres Located East of T.H. 149.& South of T.H. 55, SE 1/4 of Section 12 �(e'jI. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Sideyard Setback Require- ment for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition, Located East of Galaxie Avenue on West Wind Tr., NW 1/4 of Section 32 p \45 J. Special Permit (Overhill Replat - Grand Oaks Development) to Allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval, Located at Lot 2, Block 4, Overhill Farms 2nd Addition Replat, East of Dodd, North of Hay Lake Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25 pkl 3K. 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance \ Renewal VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses on \ Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh, 2882 Sibley Memorial Highway, West of Highview Park, 5112 1 Section 4 B. .Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee \ C. Public Improvement Contracts .P lV 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Rd) 1 ,1$32. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Eagandale Lemay 1 Lake 2nd Addition \0\3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Sperry P ` Consolidation Facility Dp Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Daniel Drive) A. Five -Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects I%. VISITORS TO BE REARD (for those persons not on the agenda) Z. S. ADJOURNMENT ,, l_1 40 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 12, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE-'MINUTES] After approval is given to the June 17, 1986, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the June 3 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: DEPARTMENT;HEAD:;BUSINESS A. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. 3M Presentation of a Resusci Junior ---Mr. Tom Hutter, branch operations manager of the Twin Cities sale center at the 3M plant located in Eagan, will present a resusci junior to the Eagan Fire Department. Since two of our firefighters, Scott Wood and Jim Mueller, have given instruction time for the CPR training, they would like to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and Jim on behalf of all the employees involved in this training at 3M. Chief Childers and firefighters Wood and Mueller. will be at the meeting for the presentation. Enclosed on page _ J is a copy of a letter that was sent by Mr. Hutter to Fire Chief Childers, regarding the equipment and the official recognition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: There is no formal action required. However, the minutes should reflect the acceptance of a monetary receipt for specialized fire department equipment. f Twin Cities Sales Center/31Y! PO Box 33211 St. Paul, Minnesota 551333211 3130 Lexington Avenue South Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2239 612/733 3300 May 28, 1986 Mr. Robert Childers 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Childers: Two of your firemen, Scott Wood and Jim Mueller gave unselfishly of their time to furnish instruction in the art of CPR to several of our 3M employees. We would like to express our appreciation for this ser- vice by presenting you with the enclosed check for $375.00 to be used for the purchase of a Resusci Junior which I understand is a mannequin used for water rescue and resuscitation training. If possible, we would like you to make arrangements to purchase this through your normal channels and then advise us when it would be convenient for us to present this to you in a formal ceremony at one of your meetings or at a City Council Meeting. At that time I would plan to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and Jim on • behalf of all of the employees involved in this training and 3M. Leroy Kugel, as our on-site representative, would also accompany me for this presentation. I would appreciate your giving me a call or dropping me a note as to the time and place that it would be appropriate for this presentation. On behalf of 3M and our employees I want to thank you for making time available for Scott and Jim to provide this training for our employees. It is sincerely appreciated. Sincerely, T.C�u ter Branch Operations Manager Twin Cities Sales Center/3M TCH:jah cc: Leroy Kugel 0 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two FIRE DEPARTMENT CONT"D 2. Resignation of Fire Chief Childers --Bob Childers, Fire Chief has formally submitted his resignation to be effective July 5, 1986, from the Eagan Fire Department and the po ition of Fire Chief, for the City of Eagan. Enclosed on page is a copy of his resignation letter. (There is additional information concerning the position of Fire Chief and is'enclosed as a part of the Informative Memo.) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Bob Childers as Fire Chief for the City of Eagan. 3 June 5, 1986 TO: EAGAN CITY EAGAN FIRE TOM HEDGES EAGAN FIRE COUNCIL DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE BOARD DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION FROM: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF ® I hereby submit my resignation as of July 5, 1986 from the Eagan Fire Department and the position of Fire Chief for the City of Eagan. The purpose of my resignation is for retirement after serving twenty three (23) years as an Eagan Volunteer Fire Fighter. T have most certainly enjoyed my association with the fire department and the city. I fdel I have personally gained much from my experience. I deeply appreciate the support I have received from the members of the fire department and all the departments of the city. It sure helped me accomplish my job much easier. ® I wish the fire department well and I will be available to help when I can. Respectfully yours, Bob Childers BC/ma Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Stop Sign Request, Yorktown Place and Trenton Road --In the early part of April, Charles Souza of 4248 Trenton Road (.Lot 1, Block 3, Northview Meadows) contacted the Police Department for a complaint regarding traffic volumes and property damage to his corner lot at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Trenton Road. Subsequently, the Police Department reviewed the situation on April 12 and 13, with Officer Kasat submitting his report enclosed on page 6� . On April 15, Councilman Wachter relayed this property owner's • concern to the Council and it was referred to the Engineering Division for further investigation.. Enclosed on pageZ is a copy of the report prepared by the Assistant City Engineer regarding the request for a three way stop sign at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Trenton Road. Earlier this year, the Engineering Division received a similar request for a stop sign at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. In this similar situation, this intersection did not meet the warrants for the installation of a stop sign and the requesting property owner was so informed by the letter enclosed on page �/, . Mr. Souza has been informed that this item will be considered by the Council at the June 17 meeting for final resolution. It is the staff's recommendation that a three way stop sign not be installed, but rather yield signs be placed on Trenton Road at the intersection with Yorktown Place and on Yorktown Place at the intersection with Braddock Trail. Enclosed on page is a map showing the relationship of the two intersections be ng discussed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM': To approve the installation of three way stop signs or yield signs at the intersections of Trenton Road/Yorktown Place and Yorktown Place/Braddock Trail. ('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J M1� V � A_ p i o O� �lN�l�6i✓,y �YO%, y'�)d�,S s!/�y/Yi1 �d`� � ti //" �Ngp��j /�»'/1i lv,'Y s°eS p/ �/N® >r r ��n7�rlsx� rr��y>o u sr is ;)s y ('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J M1� V � A_ p T Kre.s cols• eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r 4 " ' � !4 op 4,0 �,v r • i o O� 7 ❑ D' n` Z Mm ❑ � ti Y Z �l I �y f T Kre.s cols• eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r 4 " ' � !4 op 4,0 �,v r • 7 ❑ D' n` Z Mm ❑ � ti Y Z T Kre.s cols• eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r 4 " ' � !4 op 4,0 �,v r • MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: APRIL 24, 1986 SUBJECT: 3 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF YORKTOWN PLACE AND TRENTON ROAD At the April 15, 1986, Council meeting, Coucilman Wachter informed me of a complaint he received from the owner of Lot 1, Block 3, of Northview Meadows Addition. The complainant contacted the Police Department regarding his concerns for the high traffic volumes associated with the modal homes located just north of him. In addition, the complainant alleges that vehicles have been jumping the curb and driving over the corner of his lot. Chief Berthe had two officers investigate the complaint. They did not see anyone drive over the complainant's yard, however, they felt a three-way stop sign would be appropriate at • the Trenton Road and Yorktown Place intersection. Attached is a copy of the officer's report. I disagree with the recommended three-way stop sign to be used as a speed control. The manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises specifically warns against using stop signs for controlling speed limit. Also, I do not believe this intersection would meet with any of the following warrants found in the manual: 1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. 2. Street entering a through highway or street. 3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 4. An intersection where a combination of high speed, restricted view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. 40 Yorktown Place is a street built to normal residential standards. I would estimate the traffic volumes upon full development of the area surrounding Yorktown Place to be about 700 trips per day. I would anticipate the builders of the existing model homes to convert those into residential units by the end of this year. Then the traffic will be based on normal residential usage. In summary, I feel that a three-way stop sign placement at the Yorktown Place and Trenton Road intersection would be an inappropriate means of speed limit control. I would be happy to discuss %�tth%his in more detail with you if you would so desire. Assistant City Engi er RMH/]] cc: Jay Berthe, Police Chief Ted Wachter, City Councilman ®■ 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P - BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN .1AMES A. SMITH - MC ELLISON ' THEODORE WACHTER March 12, 1986 COUnC° Memms - .- - -. THOMAS HEDGES CIN Adminstf Wo1 EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE ON Clerk KAREN MURPHY 4253 BRADDOCK TRAIL EAGAN MN 55123 RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL - YORKTOWN PLACE AT BRADDOCK TRAIL Dear Karen: I am writing in response to your request for a stop sign at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. The City has standard conditions which need to be met to warrant stop signs. These conditions are outlined in a manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Our office has looked at this intersection and was unable to meet any of these conditions to warrant a stop sign. Although you expressed an interest in a stop sign, we feel that a yield sign would be more appropriate.. This would catch the attention of the drivers without requiring a complete stop in all cases. Therefore, if you would like to request placement of a yield sign in writing to our. office, I think we would have a better chance of getting a method of traffic control at Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. Sincerely, ai,d E. Knudsen Engi eering Technician CEK/jj N THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY SEC. r 6� O 7 R / 3 CO' "Y D N. CARSON I ``, V _ (mr♦ 9 L/:=v L/a CAvOTT COUNT I Y �Y ' / ®C 1` _ Y. VINN E.L1 '., � :.i R23 SLPTEVBER,1.11 , a CN IH SEC 24, T. 27, R.'3 AID :T— _ _ __ _ r FP HI GFN'AY ......r.n .r.-- NO )D n,. ,1.: ,.. , ,Y __ .r.. •. �.. £✓ � ¢ '• .- ,.• DIF „!LC-�Y ic,;� _ , jDIf REI' gDADIT— CDIIXTT rL TATE "rn'� SID ••��, XIG WAYi (_EFCP0 Po'F\\ fy+'..'�y`1 a _ ye-•. �C'= f. I. ' ...r. � �/Fi + g �w<��E v JI v r. 'e •. v I .3.r� �' ' 2 Cil: O {i _"�. r Is S •2 �¢ Wlrq 1 1 'Q { 2 Q ,..• �, � L •° � .° PL CE - ^9 , IOnKTONN �• '• �, •rY PLACE ��sl=11•n•�.r., UN � E '� • ���,, ,�. L.. '�/ � . � i 1 t E>, F.�a;/ii ADDI!TIN: ,s r =1t,.—SUN _ .� P�`_. \ ° ••�`_ 5 r� i erre,, ; , v ,I; I L L. ; { , • '� .EISSD "; � t "r> i I r^xL..�x aacE i .>=� � - .. � -'�'• 'l - I s � .,rr f �r: � .� y� , r• •I�: ti �� ..V Ei"r�„r�l., s= ,FI ?', �>• f. f I +,�� _ - err. 4 .�F � •..r. .. " a ° ~ i`�'.r G\alb :� ..., ..' ;ur,.r .,'. ". � .L �•cre �, „�'• . :z' n .l ��r .i $I :l. o.° .i ••�� r•..'_n *TE LACKYDRI w r7— KING---- SECG�D 2 1g e.DJI TION �- Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four CONSENT AGENDA There are fourteen ( 14 ) items on Items requiring one (1) motion Council wishes to discuss any those items should be removed under Additional Items unless the agenda referred to as Consent by the City Council. If the City of the items in further detail, from the Consent Agenda and placed the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page is a list of contractors who are renewing or who have been selected' and retained • as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of contractor licenses as presented. /Q CONTRACTORS' LICENSE JUNE 17, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTOR 1. REGGIE KAJER CONST 2. KEN SMITH'S REMODELING 3. TWOMEY THE CARPENTER 4. J.R. UZZELL BLDRS HEATING & VENTILATING 1. PREFERRED MECHANICAL SERVICES INC PLUMBING 1. A & G PLUMBING 2. WILLIAM GADTKE 3. CHEMED CORPORATION • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Police Officer --An additional police officer position was approved for the 1986 budget effective July 1, 1986. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Curtis Sisco, who is presently a. Community Service Officer with the Eagan Police Department, be appointed to the new police officer position. As the Council is aware, Eagan C.S.O. 's have completed the education and skills requirements necessary for P.O.S.T. licensure. They have been processed through a rigorous interview and screening procedure before they are selected as C.S.O.'s and have spent many months in training in the Eagan Police Depart- ment. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Curtis Sisco as a Policer Officer, effective July 1, 1986. Item 2. C.S.O.--If the hiring of Curtis Sisco is approved, a vacancy will exist for a C.S.O. It is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Kenneth Conyers be appointed to that C.S.O. position. Conyers is P.O.S.T. certified and has previously served as an officer in the Eagan Police Department. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Kenneth Conyers as a C.S.O. in the Eagan Police Department. Item 3. Compost Site Monitors --Two positions are available for the part-time, temporary position of Compost Site Monitor. These employees would work only on Saturday afternoons and only ® one employee would work any one Saturday. It is, however, neces- sary to have two Compost Site Monitors in order to insure that a monitor is available. It is the recommendation of Administrative Assistant Hohenstein that Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz be hired to fill these temporary positions. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz as temporary compost site Monitors for the 1986 season. Item 4. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker --It is the recommenda- of Superintendent of Utilities and Buildings• Connolly that David Erickson be hired to fill the one remaining vacant seasonal. utility maintenance worker position. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of David Erickson as a Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker. /v Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Six FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/ROBBINS ADDITION C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Robbins Addition which is located in the SW Quadrant of 1-494 and T.H.149 as shown on a copy of the plat enclosed on page All conditions of placed on the preliminary plat approval November 17, 1981, have been complied with and the final plat conforms with the previous preliminary plat approval concept. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Robbins Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk • to execute all related documents. /3 I VCMRT YAP rrr ; 7r118,.cr n 00 rJ DETAIL rno $CALF) EXHIBIT it Aa Ah ROBINS A®®IiI®N r r✓1 P` INTERSTATE A OUTLOT ti 7a w� j V we.9iPr'! { 1 1 • �I r ar QO' ♦ % �rM P' 3 I i / b 8 \\\ i c °Te Al<.rJK !A. r. rn •[� 10, b ti Ati P N' !� ��ilro' w EXHIBIT it Aa Ah ROBINS A®®IiI®N r r✓1 P` INTERSTATE • ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y YCar� i, •tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C. YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q .i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1. 494 r..T. rrr w rr % // do iu I OUTLOT ti 7a I N i { 1 1 i I 1 ♦ % �rM P' 3 I i / b 8 \\\ Jl c °Te • ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y YCar� i, •tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C. YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q .i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1. 494 r..T. rrr w rr % e 7a N 1 { v m P x b 8 i �y► !� ��ilro' • d/rj X11/ �r..w �.[trr.rr.arir 0K! <Jt'ITIOddlO w// Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 473/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING D. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --With the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob from I -35E to Apple valley in 1987, a preliminary analysis of the storm sewer needs indicate that additional trunk storm sewer improvements and revisions to existing facilities will be required to handle the increased •run-off generated from this major County road improvement.. Subsequently, our consulting engineer has pre- pared a feasibility report addressing the major areas of trunk storm sewer improvements associated with the County road upgrading. These involve modifications to the Evergreen Park lateral storm sewer system, outlets from Berry Patch Park (Mooney Lake) to Patrick Eagan Park and construction of storm sewer across City - owned property south of City Hall. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 473 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held July 15, 1986. 0 Agenda Information Memo June 1,7, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Eight AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS E. Amusement Device Renewals --The City Clerk's office has received applications for local businesses renewing amusement devices:: Attached on. page/ �f is a copy of the list of the amusement device renewals. Al-1%amusement device machines do meet and satisfy City Code regulations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ment device renewals as presented. A6 approve the 1986 amuse - Name & Address 1986 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS Number of Machines - Locations Sam Nilva 5 machines - Cedarvale National Amusement Co. P.O. Box 16206 Minneapolis, MN 55416 D.V.M. Company over 15 machines 119 State Cedarvale Lanes St. Paul, MN 55107 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive 3 machines La Fonda's 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy 4 machines Richard's Food & Liquor 4185 S. Robert Trail ® James Durning 1 machine 4625 Nicols Rd Durnings Eagan, MN 55122 Harold Steinman 2 machines 3300 Minnehaha Ave. S. Eagan Steak House Minneapolis, MN 55403 1448 Yankee Doodle Rd Theisen Vending 2 machines 3804 Nicollet Ave. S. Eagandale Club Minneapolis, MN 55409 3330 Pilot Knob Rd 2 machines Al Baker's 3434 Washington Dr • James A. Basta 1 machine Italian Pie Shoppe Italian Pie Shoppe 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan, MN 55122 Harold Awe Company 3 machines 1372 Scheffer Ave. Mr. D's Pizza St. Paul, MN 55116 3904 Beau d'Rue Dr Advance Carter Co. 2 machines 850 Decatur Ave. N. Pizza Hut Minneapolis, MN 55427 3992 Sibley Mem. Hwy. 2 machines Charkist 1975 Senaca Rd Gary Starks over 15 machines 3125 Dodd Road Starks Saloon Eagan, MN 55121 3125 Dodd Road 1 machine Piccolo's Pizzeria 4162 Pilot Knob Road 2 machines Slicer's Restaurant 2113 Cliff Rd • 0 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine SERVICE STATION RENEWALS F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals --There are ten (10) service station permits requiring renewal for the period of July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1987. A list of those service station permits are enclosed on page All service stations appear to meet regulations set forth in e City Code, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve service station permit renewals as presented. O • SERVICE STATION PERMITS JUNE.17, 1986 AGENDA Country 66 3206 Sibley Mem. Hwy. Eagan 55121 Q Petroleum 4206 Nicols Rd Eagan 55122 Superamerica Diffley Rd & Sibley Mem. Hwy. Eagan 55122 Superamerica Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan 55122 Yankee Square Standard 1424 Yankee Doodle Rd Eagan 55122 ® Eagan Service Center (Union 76) 4195 Nicols Rd Eagan 55122 Sinclair Station 3946 Cedar Eagan 55122 Eagan Standard 4205 Nicols Rd Eagan 55122 Texaco Fuel Stop 3150 Dodd Road Eagan 55121 Cedar Cliff Amoco 4600 Slater Rd Eagan 55122 There are ten service station permits which should be renewed for the period of July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987. N I* Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten TRAILER PERMIT'RENEWALS G. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals --Trailer permit renewals for 1986/19'87 have been processed by the City Clerk's office and inspected by the Building Inspections Division. The City Council has previously requested a detailed review of each trailer permit to determine whether the purpose is consistent with the reasons that were given for the granting of the actual trailer permit. Enclosed on pages 7_through _ is a copy of the Chief Building Inspector's review and a list of trailer permit renewals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the trailer permit renewals as presented. CW Y MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE.PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL DATE: JUNE 13, 1986 RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS FOR 1986/87 Administrative Intern, Cheryl Johannes, has investigated the current status of the proposed trailer permit renewals. The status of each permit on record is the same as when granted. We have received complaints of unsavory conditions at 670 Lone Oak Road and they have either been rectified or were unfounded. The permit at 3850 Cornation Drive issued to James Horne was originally for one year, to terminate June 1985 and in 1985 a renewal was granted for an additional year. A request for another one-year extension has been received and awaits Council action. • If you require further information, please contact me. DP/j • 1 f:. I ,t II C • TO: DALE PETERSON FROM: LIZ WITT DATE: JUNE 9, 1986 RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87. I have no idea of their current status. In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85. I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit expired June 1, 1986. Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv • approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home for summer construction help. I have heard some complair about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home". When do they disband? I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if possible. f w, 1 f:. I ,t II C • TO: DALE PETERSON FROM: LIZ WITT DATE: JUNE 9, 1986 RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87. I have no idea of their current status. In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85. I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit expired June 1, 1986. Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv • approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home for summer construction help. I have heard some complair about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home". When do they disband? I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if possible. RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS 1. Tripp Oil.Co. permitted prior to 1970 and 3085 Hwy 13 remain in office use. Eagan, MN 55121 2. Earl Marotzke permitted prior to 1970 and 535 Gun Club Road remains in use as a family home. Rosemount, MN 55068 3. Alwin & Lyle Schultz permitted prior to 1970 and 1315 Carriage Hills Drive remains in use as a familyhome. Eagan, MN 55121 4. Edmund Schwanz permitted in 1980 and remains in 810 Yankee Doodle Rd use as a residence for Mr. Schwanz Eagan, mN 55123 mother. -S 5. Levi Heuer permitted in 1983 and remains in 550 Diffley RD use as a residence for George Meister. Eagan, MN 55123 ® 6: Dakota Homes permitted in 1972 and remains in use 3660 Dodd Road as a sales office for mobile homes. Eagan, MN 55121 n LJ v3 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE/VOTING ACCESSIBILITY H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility - Both Federal legislation and Minnesota statutes require that all polling places located within a municipality used for primary and general elections be surveyed to determine whether the facility is accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. If any of the polling places located within the 14 precincts are not acces- sible and it is determined after a survey that there are no other locations that could be used that are accessible to the handicapped and elderly, it is necessary to appoint a special advisory committee for the purpose of continuing an effort to locate a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct 3 for future elections. If Highsite Apartments is approved • by the Secretary of State's office as the polling location for Precinct 3 after a report is filed by the Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee that there are no alternatives, then elections judges are allow to assist the handicapped or elderly voter with curbside voting or some other means available during the election. For additional information on. this item, refer to a memo prepared by Administrative Assistant Witt describing the federal polling place accessibility law on page 2ij . • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Betty Preston, Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler as members of the Voting Accessibility Advisory Committee for the purpose of continuing all efforts to locate a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct 3 for future elections. a� TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT DATE:JUNE 10, 1986 RE: FEDERAL POLLING PEACE ACCESSIBILITY LAW Federal legislation and Minnesota Statutes require that all polling places for the 1986 primary and general elections be surveyed to determine whether they are accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. A survey report is to be completed for each precinct and the reports are to be filed with the Secretary of State's office by July 11 1986. Carolyn and I have completed our survey of Eagan's 14 polling places. All but precinct 3 (High Site recreation building) are accessible or can be made access- ible. We conducted a windshield survey of the precinct, which is bounded by Pilot Knob Road, Lone Oak Road, east city limits and Yankee Doodle Road. Most of the structures are industrial/warehouse buildings which probably could not accommodate a public polling place. Other structures have security constraints which preclude public access. • We did contact Federal Land Company regarding Waterview Tower. They really were not interested in a short or long term commitment.. We -looked at the Lemay Lake Apartments which'are under construction but don't know.if they have an accessible and otherwise appropriate place for our use. Because the High Site building has stairs it is not accessible. We have provided a portable voting device to anyone who requests it, but the federal legislation says this is -riot sufficient. The Voting Act states that if the City officials determine that no available place is accessible or can be made accessible, a VotingAccessibility Advisory Committee must be established: The committee must be made up of at least 50% representation from individual or organizations representing the elderly and disabled voters. Because we do not have an accessible polling place in Precinct 3 and must report by July 1, I 'request that the City Council appoint Betty Preston > •Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler to .the Advisory Committee. The recommended appointees' represent the handicapp, elderly and Precinct Three"election judges. Following Council.approval, the Advisory Committee will make a determination of accessibility for a Precinct 3 polling place. If the committee cannot find an available place, they must file a certified request for exemption from compliance. The regulations further require that the elderly or handicapped voter must be provided an alternative means, i.e., curbside voting, which we have available. ACTION TO BE TAKEN: Approval of Betty Preston , Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Lee.ler to the Voting.Accessibility Advisory Committee. Staff will continue its efforts to locate 'a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct 3 for future elections. -5 ,0 Agenda Information Memo June -17, 198,6, City Council Meeting Page Twelve VACATE UTILITY IVE PETITION L. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Deerwood School Addition) --We have received a request to vacate the utility line easement for the water line through the Deerwood School Addition due to a change in alignment based on the final site plan for the Deerwood Elementary School. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and order a public hearing to consider a vacation of the utility easement for the Deerwood School Addition. PROJECT 476, RECEIVE REPORT ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (HIGHVIEW AVENUE) J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Highview Avenue - Streets) --At the May 6 meeting, the Council received a petition requesting the completion of the eastern 300 feet of Highview Avenue to City standards. In response to this petition, the Council authorized the feasibility report which has now been completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal discussion and action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 476' (Highview Avenue - Streets) and order the public hearing to be held July 15, 1986. CONTRACT 85-19, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition) --Contract 85-19 provided for the installation of streets and utilities for the construction of Corporate Center Curve Road to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition. Prior to completion of the final wear surface, a large "sink hole" occurred which required corrective repair action. During the excavation of repair, it was discovered that this settlement resulted from the previous deposition of construction debris (concrete curbing, etc.) approximately 15 feet below ground level. Because this corrective action was not a defect of the City's contractor, this work was above and beyond the scope of the contract and should be processed through a change order which would add $2,607.01 to the base contract. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve. Change Order #1 to Contract 85-19 in the amount of $2,607.01. Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986;, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen AND UT - L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition) --With the proposed development of the Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the developer is requesting a reconfiguration of the drainage and utility ease- ment dedicated for the pond south of Ashbury Road and east of Birchpond Road to allow the development of single family houses. With all requirements of the petition being in order, it is appropriate for the Council to schedule a public hearing for formal discussion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate the drainage and utility easement over a portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition and schedule the public hearing to be held on July 15, 1985. a7 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986., City Council Meeting Page Fourteen APPROVE FINAL PLAT, 'TEM ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for T.E.M. Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the T.E.M. Addition located south of Golden Meadow Road as shown by the map enclosed on pageeAll conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council on May 21, 1986, have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the T.E.M. Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. M • VICINITY MAP a -IRE it + M Ill%% SEt':rl TEM M. ADDI TION MINA" 1110 UII(In EASENENIS MC YIdN 111115: b;y S I..I ;l ; .ixlx.n;.. ;p;c.lp. . pio: n;.q 1.1 ilry.. A. p;p 10 I. pl.1. olpnia. IplAl.x..ptl/oinirq aln.l I�p....xpn —N— cp .wrmof ,p A y n. S'cr— is. l...:, N(w.:, i6 up.. o p p.ci,q of xo.rn A e.a•...5 .�n,l.. u . w lur. A, pp'.. 51. A,;6 �Rn AN, I p .s.�n. l ....p 'xl]Irt15-. -1... a p,.A.. pn, • III .In I. An /ip .—., I— - SIGMA 'UR BURYFVIINIB BHRVIC HO ew..e+.o p.e Nxurl�lA.NTin 0 Aaenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen APPROVE FINAL PLAT, HAMPTON HEIGHTS ADDITION N. Final Plat Approval for Hampton Heights Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Hampton Heights Addition, located south of Yankee Doodle Road, adjacent to the Public Works Maintenance Facility as shown by the map enclosed on page * All conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on May 21, 1985, have been satisfactorily complied with except for the installation of the trailway from Yankee Doodle Road to the Blackhawk Glen Addition. At a special meeting of the. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on June 11, 1986, that Commission rescinded their previous require- ment for this trail. Although the development contract agreement provided wording for compliance with this trailway requirement, if the Council concurs with the Park Commission's recommendation to eliminate this requirement, this can be resolved through an addendum to the contract and an immediate reduction in the financial guarantee as it relates to the trailway requirement. All other final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Hampton Heights Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • *Special Note: The map showing the final plat was not available for inclusion with this packet. The map will be forwarded with. the Additional Information packet on Monday. 30 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the May 6, 1986, City Council meeting a demographic study and request to amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance to allow for five (5) licenses,with the new license application to be issued in the northerly part of the City, was reviewed as presented by the Federal Land Company. As a part of the deliberation by the City Council there was some. consideration given to removing any limit on the number of off -sale licenses allowing the number of off -sale liquor stores to be controlled by the market place, similar to all other retail establishments. The following action was taken: Smith moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to authorize one additional off -sale liquor license in. the northerly portion of the City, generally in the Town Centre area, and further that a public hearing be scheduled for the June 17, 1986, Council meeting to consider removing the restrictions or revising the number of off -sale liquor licenses approved by City ordinance, noting at the time of adoption of the original policy in 1973, only Cedarvale Shopping Center was in existence; that an application would be entertained by the City Council for an additional license in the Town Centre area, and further, to authorize the revision of the Eagan Ordinance to provide for five off -sale liquor licenses within the City. "All Councilmembers voted 'yes.'" J The City Administrator has asked the Police Department to give consideration to a proposed regulatory change in removing the present ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor license. A response prepared by the Chief of Police is enclosed on page 3Z7 for your review. There are no additional thoughts or • staff background on this issue. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an ordinance amendment_ that would remove the ceiling or any regulation on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that could be granted within the City of Eagan. 3/ M 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 23 Nny 1986 TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator FROM: Chief of Police SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSES police department JAY M. BERTHE Chill nnella PATRICK J. GEAGAN AdmH.,1 .lUPYIn KENNETH D.ASZMANN ouml,.�r.Pmn I have conferred with Captains Geagan and Aszmann about their thoughts concerning additional liquor licenses within the City of Eagan. Our thoughts fall into three categories: 1. Those of a criminal nature, such as selling to minors. We now try to control this by sending a minor in to purchase liquor from each of the off sale liquor stores within the city. This is done at random times during the year with emphasis on checking each and every liquor establishment so that enforce- ment is fair and equal. Additional liquor stores would only take more time and effort as far as the police department is concerned. 2. The necessary background checks done by this department on each applicant for licensing. Captain Geagan will submit a separate memo on this issue. 3. Noncriminal issues, which triggers in each of us our own personal philosphies, such as, will Eagan appear to have an awful lot of liquor establishments within the city and thus, are we encouraging drinking by making it too available?, etc., etc. In summary, the police department, as the enforcement arm of the city, would not have a serious problem in enforcing the laws governing the operation of off sale liquor stores. n�' i . Berthe Jk 31/ THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Seventeen PROJECT 475/DANIEL DRIVE B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets & Utilities) --On May 21, the City Council received a feasibility report for the proposed upgrading of Daniel Drive (formerly South Wescott Hills Drive) necessary for the development of the Northview Meadows Second Addition south of Northview Elementary School. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and reference during the public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially assessed property owners informing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineering will be available to discuss in detail • all aspects of this proposed project and will be available to answer any questions of the Council and/or general public. 0 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 475 (Daniel Drive - streets and utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. 33 REPORT ON DANIEL. DRIVE 0 UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS r PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49395 eawdu - 9 `ftq weeu SL Pa"4 M/wweeala 3 `/ Bonestroo, Ros 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.6364600 May 22, 1986 Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Daniel Drive Utility 6 Street Improvement Project No. 475 File No. 49395 Dear Mayor and Council: uuo G. Runrvrou,. P. E. RW"" W. Rwrnr, PE. J CL And"hi, P.E. 8m✓7uN A, LrmG,q. P,E. Hrrhern E'. Turner, P.E. lwreo ('. Uh✓rr IlL Glenn R. CwY. P.E. Avuh.4. GurJm. It E. Ihmnm E. N.". II E. R,, hu,d W. F.,e,, P.., RUG,/ G. Shurw h,. I'. E. Murrl/r L..So,.ulu. Ir.E. IA.nWdG Hu, .,d, VE. Jay A. 0 ... dmr, V. E. AIu,Y A. llumun. P.E. 7,d K. IJJ✓: V.F. Mrrhurl 7'. Ruuurrunrr. It 1. NUMv/ R. /'Ir//rr4. I'. 1:, M.'d O. Lm1uw. P E. /Aurum k', Prrrnun. It E. Ahchuw C. L'n'h, HR. Aurrn L. Illlhr, V1. Jmnr, R. ArWun 1, PF A'rwmh P. And" nini, Il L. A'rvh A. HUJurwmi, Pl:. Mm1 R. Rule, PE. Rnhrn ('. HurrrY. A.I.A. 7hurrrv/ E. A.,,,, P.E: I hudn d. Frulvm I e. M. Pe.0A. imnun 11. (llvm Sown AL Ehrrnn Transmitted herewith is our report for Daniel Drive, Project No. 475. This report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and street construction and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, EONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. -7�� A"4 - Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws' of tha StatMinnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: May 22, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 n' Approved by: Department of P" lic Works _ Date: 5294d 35` . F- 1 LJ 0 SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and street for Daniel Drive. Daniel Drive serves as the southwesterly boundary of Northview Meadows an existing single family develop- ment, and the proposed single family development Northview Meadows 2nd Addi- tion. The property southwesterly of Daniel Drive is unplatted and undeveloped property presently zoned for commercial and light business use. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for ® the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 8" PVC sanitary sewer in Daniel Drive to serve Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and the abutting property to the southwest. The sanitary sewer is a continuation of that sanitary sewer serving Northview Meadows Addition presently located in the southerly portion of Daniel Drive formerly known as South Wescott Hills Drive. It is intended the sanitary sewer will continue westerly as Daniel Drive continues westerly to serve the adjacent property as it develops. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 12" DIP water main in Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. The 12" water main will connect to an existing 6" water main at Daniel Drive and Braddock Trail. The 12" diameter main is required to serve the commercial property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. This 12" main will ultimately connect to the existing trunk mains in Lexington Avenue and Co. Rd. No. 30. Also included is the proper number of valves and hydrants. This area is located in the high pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressure of approximate- ly 74 psi and 68 psi respectively. Page 1. 5294d _ / Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing a storm sewer in Curry Trail and modifications to the existing storm sewer presently serving the existing Northview Meadows. The storm sewer under this project will be constructed from the proposed outlet control structure on the south side of Co. Rd. No. 30 to the south along a Lot line in Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and will continue within Curry Trail to Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. This storm sewer will ultimately be extended to the south to provide an outlet for Pond JP -28 when future development dictates the Pond JP -28 out- let. Modifications to the existing storm sewer serving Northview Meadows Addi- tion is due to the realignment of Daniel Drive and the resulting reconstruc- tion of .the Rogers Court and Trenton Trail intersections. In addition, it is proposed that a dry ponding area be created as shown on the attached drawing adjacent to Co. Rd. No. 30 designated as Pond JP -28A. Design considerations for the pond are as follows: Pond NWL HWL Storage Outflow Designation NWL Area I1WL Area (ac.ft.) (cfs) Pond JP -28A 940 0.1 ac. 951 1.4 ac. 8.6 20 To create Pond JP -28A, it will be necessary to construct an outlet control structure within the existing 48" RCP culvert beneath Co. Rd. No. 30 to re- strict the available flow down to 20 cfs. Restricting the flow through this culvert will help to minimize any downstream drainage and erosion problems north of Co. Rd. 30. In addition, it will require a smaller downstream storm sewer pipe than the 42" shown on the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes constructing Daniel Drive to a 9 ton design section 44' wide from about Rogers Court to the west Page 2. 5294d 37 0 • edge of the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition. The developer of the Northview Meadows built the easterly half (22') of South Wescott Hills Road. This road was to ultimately be upgraded to a 44' wide street when the adjacent .property developed. The existing portion of South Wescott Hills Road adjacent the pro - posed Northview Meadows Addition is proposed to be widened as part of this project to complete the construction of South Wescott Hills Drive and rename South Wescott Hills Drive to Daniel Drive. To improve traffic circulation. it is proposed to revise the alignment of Daniel Drive from Braddock Trail south- erly to a point where Rogers Court and Trenton Trail will connect to Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. This will discourage the future com- mercial traffic from using the residential neighborhood streets. Trenton Trail and Rogers Court will be reconstructed as 32' wide residential streets in which the existing surface and curbing for old South Wescott Hills, Drive will be utilized as much as possible. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 5294d CONSTRUCTION AREA NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 NORTHVIEW MEADOWS Lot 23, Block 1 Lot 37, 38, 44, Block 4 Lot 1, Block 7 Page 3. 3� COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows: Sanitary Sewer $ 46,920 Water Main 67,500 Storm Sewer 78,650 Street - Trenton Trail 6 Rogers Court 23,440 Daniel Drive 152,530 TOTAL .......................................... $369,040 The total estimated project cost is $369,040 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re- port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral sanitary sewer on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed. WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral water main on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. Trunk area water main was previously assessed. STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral storm sewer on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. Trunk area storm sewer for this area has not been assessed and it is not proposed to be assessed until the unplatted parcels either develop Page 4. 5294d or a major trunk storm sewer project for this area is required. Northview Meadows 2nd Addition will be assessed their trunk area storm sewer obligation as part of the development agreement between the City and the developer. STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street on a front foot basis to the abutting property. It is proposed to assess all lots within the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition equally on a per lot basis their proportionate share of the residential equivalent for that portion of Daniel Drive which abuts that subdivision. The remaining cost of Daniel Drive will be assessed entirely to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. The ® total cost of reconstructing the Trenton Trail and Rogers Court extension to Daniel Drive will also be assessed entirely to the unplatted property located southwesterly of the Trenton Trail extension. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: A. SANITARY SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment B. WATER MAIN ® Lateral Lateral Assessment C. STORM SEWER Lateral Lateral Assessment D. STREET Lateral Lateral Assessment Project Cost $ 46,920 $ 46,920 $ 67,500 $ 67,500 $ 78,650 $ 78,650 $175,970 $175,970 There are no trunk funds required for this project. Page 5. 5294d 0 Revenue Balance $ 46,920 $ 46,920 - 0 - $ 67,500 $ 67,500 - 0 - $ 78,650 $ 78,650 - 0 - $175,970 $175,970 - 0 - PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 6. 5294d T' May 21, 1986 June 17, 1986 June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 Fall, 1986 Summer, 1987 Springy 1988 E • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROSECT NO. 475 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920 Page 7. 5294d �v A. SANITARY SEWER 1,270 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 15'-25'dp. in pl. @ $20.00/l.f. $25,400 110 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,100 3 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 2,700 ® 30 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,800 2 Each 8"x 6" wye branch @ $50.00/each 100 15 Lin.ft. 6" PVC riser pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft. 150 2 Each Connect 8" PVC to existing 8" PVC @ $500.00/each 1,000 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 1,120 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,120 Total $34,370 +5% Contingencies 1,720 $36,090 ® +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,830 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920 Page 7. 5294d �v B. WATER MAIN 1,620 Lin.ft. 12" DIP Water wain @ $20.00/lin.ft. $32,400 180 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water main @ $12.00/lin.ft. 2,160 2 Each hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 2,000 2 Each 12" Butterfly valve 5 box @ $800.00/each 1,600 5 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $400.00/each 2,000 5,100 Lbs. Fittings in place @ $1.50/lb. 7,050 2 Each Connect 12" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 1 Each Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 1,240 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,240 Total $49,450 +5% Contingencies 2,470 $51,920 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 15,580 TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................... $67,500 5294d Page 8. P • Page 9. 5294d 0T C. STORM SEWER 150 Lin.ft. 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @$38.00/lin.ft. $ 5,700 650 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 18,200 560 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 13,440 70 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft. 1,400 5 Each Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 5,500 2 Each Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 1,800 7 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 5,600 LUMP SUM Construct outlet control structure in existing 48" ® RCP @ Co. Rd. No. 30 @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 2 Each Reconstruct existing CB as MH @ $500.00/each 1,000 1 Each Connect to existing storm sewer @ $500.00/each 500 4 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd. 200 1,280 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,280 Total $57,620 +5% Contingencies 2,880 $60,500 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 18,150 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................... $78,650 Page 9. 5294d 0T D. STREET a. Trenton Trail Extended 6 Rogers Court 1,400 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd. $ 1,400 550 Sq.yds. Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,100 90 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft. 270 200 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 600 100 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 600 500 Ton Class 5 100% crushed aggregate base @ $7.50/ton 3,750 110 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton 1,320 110 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 1,430 12 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton 2,160 60 Ton Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 90 600 Lin.ft. 8618 Concrete curb and gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft. 3,300 5 Each Adjust MH, CB 6 GV box @ $150.00/each 750 0.4 Acre Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000/ac. 400 Total $17,170 +5G Contingencies 860 • $18,030 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 5,410 TOTAL.............................................. $23,440 Page 10. 5294d 05 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200 TOTAL............................................. $152,530 Page 11. 5294d A b. Daniel Drive 2,000 Cu.yds. Common excavation @ $2.50/cu.yd. $ 5,000 8,000 Sq.yds. Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd. 8,000 600 Sq.yds. Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd. 1,200 240 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb S gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft. 720 400 Cu.yds. Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd. 1,200 200 Cu.yds. Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd. 1,200 6,000 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton 30,000 1,300 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton 15,600 650 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton 8,450 110 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton 19,800 400 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 600 3,050 Lin.ft. B618 concrete curb 6 gutter @ $5.50/lin.ft. 16,775 12 Each Adjust MH, CB b GV box @ $150.00/each 1,800 1.4 Acre Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac. 1,400 Total $111,745 +5% Contingencies 5,585 ® $117,330 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200 TOTAL............................................. $152,530 Page 11. 5294d A A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Description NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 B. WATER MAIN NE 1/4. SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 C. STORM SEWER NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 Parcel 013-02 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 013-05 Wp**W9•J APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 475 Assessable Footage 100 720 160 980 520 720 160 150 1,550 520 720 160 530 1,930 Page 12. Y/ Rate/F.F. $47.88 47.88 47.88 $43.55 43.55 43.55 43.55 $40.75 40.75 40.75 40.75 Total Assessment $ 4,788 34,472 7,660 $46;920 $22,645 31,355 6,968 6,532 $67,500 $21,191 29,341 6,520 21,598 $78,650 1-74 0 D. STREET a.) Trenton Trail Extended 5 Ro¢er's Court Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 013-05 420 $55.81 $23,440 420 $23,440 b.) Daniel Drive NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 57.0 $80.85 $ 42,043 Parcel 013-02 720 80.85 58,213 Parcel 010-03 160 80.85 12,936 Parcel 013-05 150 80.85 12,128 Northview Meadows 2nd Addition 1,130 24.08(l) 27,210 2,680 $152,530 (1) Assessment rate equals residential equivalent (32') from the Trunk as- sessment Rates Utilities and Streets, Eagan, Minnesota 1986 and does not include costs associated with grading. 5294d Page 13. Ve SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 375 Parcel Sanitary Water Description Sewer Main NE 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 012-01 $ 4,788 Parcel 013-02 34,472 Parcel 010-03 7,660 Parcel 013-05 Northview Meadows 2nd Addition Lots 1-24, Block 1 & Lots 1-14, Block 2 $22,645 31,355 6,968 6,532 Storm Sewer $21,191 29,341 6,520 21,598 $46,920 $67,500 $78,650 Page 14. 5294d Street $42,043 58,213 12,936 35,568 Total Assessment $ 90,667 153,381 34,084 63,698 27,210 27,210 $175,970 $369,040 1] 0 • U 010-76 010.03 DIFFLEY ROAD 010-75 010.76 (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) s 7 • � r • .O F( R H Ell • (` 1x O \ x • n w .e n v _ , TR IL 1 • n q / D4N/E' r O Zn 1i n Q ie ~ j IY U i PROPOSED oq xx 1. m 8" SANITARY == e i SEWER �o13-o2 i0 eq s 010.04 0 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS SANITARY SEWER PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN, MINNESOTA OPOSED N SANITARY t .WER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER " u n n • BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date'. MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 1 Comm. 49396 010.78 010.77 1 010-75 DIFFLEY ROAD I(COUNTY ROADI No. 30) 16 tY• � v R H E .. •O ,o e • r o \ r PL • \ oMADOki O a a n ,a ie i u 1 _ x •�rj TR IL 'i u u YOR'KT WN • W 4 io • Y U m u u a, u v z PROPOSED o x• I Ei r Y 1211 WATER MAIN ,v • J 10 I Q I 013-02 a zv / 010-03 16 _ ex xx • H POn8 w-ze NYL. 959.0 HWL, 969 I ®s 010-09 D 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS WATER MAIN PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN. MINNESOTA n ooi n x Oj O ,• eo 012-01 v EXISTING` `-�A WATER MAIN C' ' O \ a 1 00-05 p �� H n BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK A ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul Minn Date: MAY, loos FIG. No. 2 Comm. 49395 010-0e 010-77 OIo-75 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE ol0-16 DIFF�EY ROAD (COUNTY ROADFNO301 I—EXISTING 48 RCP I .0 PROPOSED ����— l POND JP-28A NWL°940.0 HWL•951.0 , � • Y , x, STORAGE ° 8.6 Acre-Feet � R H E 00 IB 'o PL • • x • '• ,• ° mM DWS ' • 9i u =• O : , , • u w .e w w V u • , flirj n TR IL �YORKT WNL PL. 11 19 PROPOSED \\ o STORM SEWER \\ 'Fi r' i\ QR .° ii • , i• W xa14Q \ 015-02 xo 010-03 24 FUTURE STORM SEWER u a , vor.o jv.ze DD/T/ NWL. 956.0 l O Q ,• ,o HW L . 969! 012.01 .• EXISTING __ STORM ' •Poe " {" ' PROPOSED SEWER c� STORM SEWER 5 i ®,. u u \\• PONO JP 50 /// a• SR •• MW1. 964.0 HWL, 9TI.T a• .( N H REMOVE to Ex. CB 9 , BUILD MH i CONSTRUCT CB OVER EK. PIPE 9 se ,x 010-04 013-05 o PROPOSED 0 100 200 300 vm� w u STORM SEWER GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET ,• '• DANIEL DRIVE BONESTROO• ROSENE, ANDERLIK UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers STORM SEWER St. Paul, Minn. PROJECT No. 475 Date: MAY, 198s FIG. No. :3] EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49395 010.19 010-05 010-n DIFFLEY ROAD r • , • E� N 1, 5) Oj i, � � 10 �x x° • Y w � U i• u R u xl r � LL •F/ T` 5 O xx I' -I Y i, I io x] , 1• Q 013-02 ,° I It x. n u vono PROPOSE �P.29 STREET i,' ' oDiri MW L. 99E.0 IPAPROVE ENTQQ - ' O O 1• nwl 04Y.4 / b(2-01 44� F -F ., RE �`� ` ••gyp Ct4. EXISTING STREET TO ; BE REMOVE 4 0 , „ 0q 32'F -F a 010.04 0 100 200 300 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET DANIEL DRIVE UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS STREETS PROJECT No. 475 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 010-75 010-i6 (COUNTY ROAD No. 30) , 1 EXISTING STREET TO ° BE REMOVED 1x 015 -05 u BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date: MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 4 Comm. 49395 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 458 C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) --With the discovery of the inad- vertent ommissions of mailed notifications for the original public hearing held on January 21, 1986 for this project, it is inap- propriate to continue with the proposed final assessments until such time that the initial public hearing, process can be properly completed. Subsequently, the City Council set a new public hearing to consider the merits of this project to be heard on July 1, 1986. If at the conclusion of that public hearing the project is approved, it would be appropriate to then consider the proposed • final assessments for Project 458. L J Enclosed on pages Js andis a copy of the letter that was sent by registered mail o all affected property owners, informing them of this revised hearing process for both the original public hearing and the proposed final assessment hearing. Based on this action and information that has been forwarded, staff is recommending that the Council close the public hearing and not take any action regarding this assessment role until the public hearing process can be completed and fully compliedwith. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing for final assessments for Project 458 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sewer-). 617" 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE (612)454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH June 10, 1986 MC.EUUSON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members MAS He: Project 458, Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sever c� ;aGoB NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING DATE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Ciry Clem Dear Property Owner: As a result of ongoing analysis relating to the continued growth of our community, and in particular, development within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park, the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department determined that there may be a need for additional storm sewer facilities within this Industrial Park to handle the additional development. On August 6, 1985, the Council authorized the preparation of a preliminary feasibility report to.further evaluate these needs. On November 19, the Council received the completed feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing to be held on January 21, 1986, to discuss the results of this report with all the affected property owners who would be benefitted by these proposed improvements and correspondingly assessed for its related costs. A copy of this report is enclosed for your information. It was recently discovered that several property owners were inadvertently omitted from the notification process of that January 21 public hearing. Because of the City Council and staff's desire to ensure that all property owners within the benefitted drainage district are provided every opportunity to discuss this proposed improvement and the related assessments prior to formal action ordering the related storm sewer construction, a new public hearing date has been scheduled. Recently, you should .have received a notice of a final assessment hearing for the June 17 City Council meeting relating to this project. Due to the City's discovery of the inadvertent omission of previous notification regarding the original public hearing, the City has rescheduled both the public hearing to consider the installation of this project and the related final assessment hearing to July 1, 1986. Enclosed with this letter are two Notices of Hearing which supersede any notices that you may have received at an earlier time regarding Project 458. These notices are summarized as follows: 1. A Notice of Public Hearing scheduled for July 1, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, at which time the City Council will discuss the merits of the proposed project and determine whether or not this project should be constructed. 2. A Notice of Assessment Hearing also scheduled for July 1, 1986, at 7:00 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, which will follow the above -referenced initial public hearing. If the project is approved as a result of the public hearing, the City Council will then determine whether the assessments to finance this project should be adopted as proposed. �5 THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY June 10, 1986 Page 2 Unless the Council can be assured that this project will be financed without objections to special assessments from the property within the drainage district, it is questionable whether this project will be improved for construction. If this project is not approved, the City will have to consider placing a moratorium on all future development within this drainage district until such time that adequate drainage facilities can be provided. If both the public and final assessment hearing are concluded without any written objections being submitted, the Council will consider awarding the contract which would allow construction to begin by the middle of July. In order to provide more detailed information, I would like to schedule an informal informational meeting to be held at 1:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall on Tuesday, June 24, 1986. Hopefully, all your questions and concerns can be adequately addressed at that meeting and any unresolved issues can be discussed at the formal hearings on July 1. • IN SUMMARY, ALL PREVIOUS NOTICES REGARDING PROJECT 458 SHOULD BE DISREGARDED AND THE SCHEDULE THAT IS PROVIDED BY THE ENCLOSED NOTICES AND DISCUSSED HEREIN SHOULD NOW CONTROL. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns you may have regarding this letter or the upcoming meetings. Sincerely 'T o.as A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Mark Hanson, Consulting Design Engineer Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk Enclosure r 5� ALSCOR INV JNT VENTURE C/O OPUS CORP BOX 150 MPLS MN 55440 NW MUTUAL LIFE INS CO 720 E WISCONSIN AVE MILWAUKEE WI 53200 ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO INC 2855 EAGANDALE BLVD *AN MN 55121 ALSCOR INV 800 OPUS CTR 9900 BREN RD E MINNETONKA MN 55343 AM FRUIT & PRODUCE CO 4 EAGANDALE BLVD PAUL MN 55121 CHICAGO TUBE & IRON CO MN 2940 EAGANDALE RD ST PAUL MN 55121 TERRENCE M & DENNIS STEVENS 2935 SERVICE RD W EAGAN MN 55121 i • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 471 D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 471, West Service Drive (Storm Sewer) ---In response to a petition and waiver of hearing submitted by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance (owners of affected lots), the Council authorized a feasibility and detailed plan preparation for the lateral extension of the storm sewer facilities. along the West Service Drive towards I -35E. Due to the fact that this project is not feasible unless Project 458, as previously discussed, is approved', it would be inappropriate to adopt the final assessment roll prior to the conclusion of the public hearing process for Project 45'8. Also, with the public hearing process being properly compliedwith regarding this project, a continuation of this final assessment hearing to the July 1 meeting would be appropriate.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public hearing for Project 471 (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer) until July 1, 1986. M Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty PROJECT 444R/HOLLAND LAKE E. Public Hearing for Project 444R (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --On May 21, the Council received the revised feasi- bility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled the public hearing to be held on June 17. Enclosed on pages through oD is a copy of this report for the Council's review reference during this public hearing process. All property owners proposed to be assessed by this project have been noticed and informed of this public hearing. Representatives of the County Park Department will also be in attendance regarding their relation- ship to this project. Several meetings have been held with the property owners in the Lakewood Hills Addition regarding permission to perform preliminary • survey work in anticipation of this project progression. In addition, on Wednesday evening, June 11, a neighborhood meeting was held at which time our consulting engineer reviewed this proposed project with the affected property owners. Our consultant will be available to further discuss and answer any questions relating to this project that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 444R (Holland Lake, - Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. • _6� REPORT ON HOLLAND LAKE AREA ® TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 4448 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 1955 FILE No. 49355 /3o aa, Rte, f4mJ44" & 4&"c&-tes, Sow. 94 Pa"4 Mow a& to Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612636.4600 May 14, 1986 Honorable Mayor 6 Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Engineers & Architects Re: Holland Lake Area Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 444R Our File No. 49355 Dear Mayor and Council: On. G, tlunauau, PE kuhrr, W. Nwrnr. PE. J -,,h C. Andrlhk. P.E. BraJJwd A. LrmArr,, P.E. R,,hurd E. Turn,, P E, Jau'e+C. Ohm. P.E. Glenn R. C.A. P.E. Ari,S A. GurJun. Y.C. Thumm E. Nuyn. P.C. Rahard W. h'werr. P.E. Raker, G. S9unirhl, Y.E. At.,. L. S.,Mw. P.E. Cbnald C. B.,.,dl. P.E. Jerry A. B ... dan, P.E. Murk A. Hawun. P.E. T,d A'. h,ld. P. E. M,hA d7 Nuunnunn. P.E. Ru Mal N, PJryl,ln ISE. tkrv,d G. LmAwa, P.E. Th.. W. Pn,+an, P.E Mahal C. L,n,h, PE A'urrn L. Willi+, P.E. Jaron R. Mulund, P.E. A'rnne,h P. Andenun, P.E. A'n,h A. tlurhnwnn, P.E. Murk N. Rul/+, Y.E. R.b ,, C. R.,k, A.I.A. Thwnu+E. A.,m, P.E. SmR L. Yaan,. P.E. Charly A. ErirA,ua Lru Al. Pu.rhky Iludm At oh. SuAon M. EGdin Transmitted herewith is our report for Holland Lake Area Project No. 444R trunk storm sewer improvements. This report discusses trunk storm sewer improvements in the Holland Lake area and presents cost estimates and also included is a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws ✓fof Oe StateofMinnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date/e: �MMaay 14, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: r � 4";t ���lV/ Department of Public Works" Date: 6— 5153d 61 30 Year Anniversaryr r1 LJ r SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer in the southeastern portion of the City in the vicinity of Holland Lake. The project proposes, to construct storm sewer outlets for Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, and LP -51 as designated in the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. An alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm sewer out- let for Pond LP -36. These ponds are presently land locked and are receiving storm water runoff from the existing developments adjacent to Wilderness Run Road (Wedgewood Addition, Sheffield Addition, Oakwood Heights, and Fawn Ridge). In addition, the lift station to control Schwanz Lake (Pond LP -32) an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut- ting Schwanz Lake. The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support- ing residential homes. which is pumped ultimately to Pond LP -61 has been turned off because of the standpoint and can best be carried out as one contract. The project slightly modifies the 1984 present lack of storage in Pond LP -61. !•_s a result, Schwanz Lake hasrisento an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut- ting Schwanz Lake. The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support- ing residential homes. would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve, maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There- fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in - Page 1. 5153d 6-2,- FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and can best be carried out as one contract. The project slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This Comprehensive Plan would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve, maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There- fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in - Page 1. 5153d 6-2,- corporate any portion of their internal storm water management into our trunk system at some future time provided it pays its trunk area trunk sewer assess- ment for that area which would benefit from the City's storm sewer system. However, because this storm sewer project will not be designed for excess ca- pacity to include future Dakota County Park drainage, it would only be permit- ted to drain into the storm sewer system during off peak dry periods when the City's storm sewer system is not being utilized for its own needs. Revision from the Comprehensive Plan therefore include the following: 1) The gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond LP -34 will be directed to Pond LP -46 instead of Pond LP -35. 2) Ponds LP -35 and LP -36 will not have the availability of a gravity outlet 0 due to elevation constraints. Therefore, the outlet for this area re- quires a lift station and force main located in the northwest corner of Pond LP -36 discharging into the gravity line between Pond LP -46 to LP -37 which is proposed as an alternate to this feasibility report. 3) The gravity storm sewer from Pond LP -46 will be directed to Pond LP -37 in lieu of the proposed east -west storm sewer along Cliff Road. 4) Dakota County Park runoff is not included in the capacity designs of City of Eagan storm sewer system. 0 DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer in the Holland Lake area. It is proposed to construct a gravity storm sewer from Pond LP -34 (located immediately south of Pond LP -61) to Pond LP -46 through Lakewood Hills Addition as shown on the attached drawing. A short gravity line will also be constructed to the north from Pond LP -34 to Pond LP -61 to control the elevation and storage within Pond LP -61. It is also pro- posed that a gravity storm sewer line be constructed from Pond LP -46 to Pond LP -37 to Pond LP -51 as shown on the attached drawing, 5153d Page 2. �3 Pond LP -51 will be controlled by a lift station pumping through a force main constructed westerly along Cliff Road discharging into a gravity storm sewer at Ches Mar Drive. The gravity storm sewer from Che.s Mar Drive will then be constructed westerly along Cliff Road and discharge into the existing storm sewer located within the ravine in the well site area. It is further proposed to complete the storm sewer within the well site as shown on the at- tached drawing. This includes constructing a gravity storm sewer within the westerly ravine extended southerly to.the existing 60" diameter culvert under Cliff Road near Pilot Knob Road. ® Included in Table A is a listing of those ponds which are proposed to have outlets constructed as part of this project and the specific design considera- tions regarding each pond. As noted in this Table, 3 ponds are protected wet- lands controlled by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Therefore, a permit will be required from the DNR prior to constructing the outlet for these ponds. An alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm sewer outlet for Pond LP -36. The gravity outlet for Pond LP -46 to LP -37 will ® be constructed adjacent to Pond LP -36 at an elevation of approximately 879. However, the normal water elevation as proposed in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for Pond LP -36 is 862.0. Therefore, a small lift station and force main is required which will discharge into the gravity storm sewer between Pond LP -46 and LP -37. Presently, McDonough Lake (Pond LP -45) located in Dakota County Park south of Cliff Road does outlet into the drainage area tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. Therefore, extremely high water elevations have resulted in Pond LP -35 and LP -36. However, because Dakota County Park has indicated they will ultimately contain their own storm water runoff within the park, design considerations for the lift station for Pond LP -36 includes Pi 3. 5153d b�7/" TABLE A POND DATA Page 4. 5153d ® 0 Comp. i Comp. Existing Comp. Comp. Plan Proposed Plan Proposed Pond Level DNR Plan Proposed Plan Proposed Storage Storage Outflow Outflow No. 5/66 NOHW NTATL NWL HWL HVL (Ac -Ft) - (Ac -Ft) (cfs) cfs)- Pond LP -34 885.6 NA 879.0 882.7 888.5 890 20.3 16.7 6.0 5.19 Pond LP -35 872.7 NA 870.5 870.5 880.0 873.0 22.6 2.5 11.1 0.5 Pond LP -36 867.5 NA 862.0 862.0 864.5 864.5 5.5 5.5 0 0.5 Pond LP -37 881.5 879.6 878.3 878.3 880.6 882.8 8.6 18.2 1.0 * 5.97 Pond LP -46 883.3 879.4 879.2 879.2 881.5 884.0 17.8 39.9 1.0 * 5.24 Uk Pond LP -51 867.7 NA 865.0 867 878.5 880 12.8 17.0 6.0 7.0 Pond LP -61 885.3 884.8 884.4 884.4 888.5 890.0 36.4 52.5 6.0 5.19 Page 4. 5153d ® 0 only the drainage area tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. In addition to the lift station and force main construction, a gravity storm sewer draining the low area north of Pond LP -35 to Pond LP -35 and an access road to serve the lift station will be required. EASEMENTS: Easements required for this project are as follows: A.) BASE PROJECT Parcel Permanent Temporary Description Owner (Acre) (Acre) SE 1/4, SECTION 26 LAKEWOOD HILLS South Part Lot 4 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12 Lot 10 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12 Lot 11 Lloyd Wills 0.04 0.16 Lot 13 Gustav Degler 0.07 0.20 Lot 14 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.16 Outlot A Samuel Rockwood 0.01 0.02 WILDERNESS RETREAT Lot 1 (013-00) Samuel Rockwood 0.14 0.35 Lot 5 (055-00) Tom Steinmuller 0.25 1.1 SW 1/4, SECTION 26 Parcel 010-56 Paul Johnson 0.09 0.25 Parcel 014-55 Linda Jones 0.09 0.25 Parcel 020-53 Albert Carlson 1.0 -- 1.84 2.73 B.) ALTERNATE PROJECT SE 1/4, SECTION 26 LAKEWOOD HILLS Lot 14 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12 Lot 15 (S. 250') Robert Ferguson 0.035 0.10 Lot 15 (N. 250') Helen Undis 0.035 0.10 WILDERNESS RETREAT Part of Lot 5 (051-00) Sally Beauchemin 0.10 0.22 0_20 0.52 Assuming a cost of $7,000/acre for permanent easement and $2„000/acre for temporary easement, it is estimated the total cost for easement acquisition is $18,340 for the base project while for the alternate is $2,060. Page 5. 5153d M AREA TO BE INCLUDED: SWC SECTION 25 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 014-51 SES SECTION .26 Parcel 018-75 Parcel 019-75 Parcel 020-75 Parcel 021-75 Parcel 022-75 Parcel 021-77 Parcel 030-77 ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA SA SECTION 26 WILDERNESS RETREAT Parcel 010-51 Lot 1 (013-00) Parcel 020-51 Part Lot 5 (055-00) Parcel 011-52 Part Lot 5 (052-00) Parcel 010-53 Part Lot 5 (051-00) Parcel 020-53 Parcel 010-54 LAKEWOOD HILLS Parcel 013-55 Lot 1-20 Parcel 014-55 Parcel 010-56 OAK POND HILLS Lots 1 & 2, Block 1 Lots 1 & 2, Block 2 OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION Lot 1-4, Block 1 Lot 1-2, Block 2 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost for the base proj- ect is $763,850 while the alternate, if included, is an additional $72,450. Each of these cost estimates includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, adminis- tration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess- ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef- fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The Page 6. 5153d 47 I* interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as- sessments. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed as part of the base project and the alternate project. In the event the alternate project is not approved, those properties proposed to be assessed as part of the alternate will not be assessed. All property located north of Cliff Road is either existing residential or poten- tial future residential property. Therefore, these areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. As previously indicated, Dakota County Park is not included as part of this project. However, in the future if they elect to be included they would be assessed for that area which would benefit from the Eagan storm sewer sys- tem. The area to be assessed would be assessed in accordance with the City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer to regional parks. TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are ® as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Homesteaded Large Lots Page 7. 5153d 4f $0.050/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft. of each acre) REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Trunk Storm Sewer Easement Project Cost Base Alternate $763,850 $72,450 18,340 2,060 Revenue Balance Base Alternate Base Alternate Trunk Area Assmts. $172,525 $212213 TOTAL $782,190 $74,510 $172,525 $21,213 -$609,665 -$53,297 It is anticipated -$609,665 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund for the base project while the alternate project is is estimated $53,297 will be required. It should be noted, however, if Dakota County Park elects to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system sometime in the future, t their assessment would be used to help defer the deficit presented herein. In addition, it should be noted many of the new developments upstream have previ- ously been assessed for trunk area storm sewer for future trunk improvements j such as this project. Therefore, those surplus assessments will be used to offset the deficit presented herein, a PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Acquire Easements Approve plans and Specifications Receive Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 8. 5153d 0 May 20, 1986 June 17, 1986 Summer, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 September, 1986 Spring, 1987 Summer, 1987 May, 1988 5153d APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HOLLAND LAKE AREA 'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS PROJECT NO. 444 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. BASE PROJECT .24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 400 Lin.ft. 94,000 610 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 2,350 Lin.ft. 158,100 100 Lin.ft. Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 550 Lin.ft. 3,600 5,270 Lin.ft. ® 3,000 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 1,200 80 Lin.ft. Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S. 14 Each 1,000 60 Lin.ft. Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton LUMP SUM 4,000 6 Each Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft. 3 Each 1,500 4,400 Cu.yds. Total LUMP SUM 29,100 2 Each +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 1 Each $763,850 600 Ton • 400 Cu.yds. 15 Acres 800 Lin.ft. 500 Sq.yds. 9,280 Lin.ft. 5153d APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HOLLAND LAKE AREA 'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS PROJECT NO. 444 30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 24,000 .24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 18,300 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft. 94,000 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,400 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 24,200 18" DIP Force main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 158,100 Jack or auger 18" DIP Force main @ $135.00/lin.ft. 10,800 Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each 12,600 MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft. 3,600 Submersible lift sta. (Pond LP -51) @ $170,000/L.S. 170,000 18" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each 3,000 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each 1,200 Pond excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd. 13,200 Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S. 8,000 Connect 24" RCP to existing MH & RCP @ $500.00/each 1,000 Connect 30" RCP to existing culvert @ $2,000.00/ea. 2,000 Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton 4,200 Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 4,000 Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac. 15,000 Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft. 1,600 Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd. 1,500 Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 9,280 Total $581,980 +5% Contingencies 29,100 $611,080 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 152,770 TOTAL ............................................. $763,850 Page 9. 70 ALTERNATE - POND LP -36 'OUTLET 300 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer @ $32.00/lin.ft. 50 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Force main @ $12.00/lin.ft. 1 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each LUMP SUM Submersible lift station Pond LP -36 @ $30,000.00/L.S. LUMP SUM - Access road @ $10,000.00/L.S. LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. 1.0 Acre Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Acre Total +5% Contingencies +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest TOTAL ALTERNATE .................................... Page 10. 5153d $ 9,600 600 1,000 30,000 10,000 3,000 1.000 $55,200 2,760 $57,960 14.490 $72,450 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL HOLLAND LAKE AREA OUTLET PROJECT NO. 444 SA SECTION 26 Parcel 010-51 261,360 Total 193,090 Assessable 9,655 Parcel Future R/W (20%) Area Credit Area Assessment Total 94,500 Description 40,380 (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment Pond (20,000) SW%'SECTION 25 $0.050/s.f. 10,278 Future R'/W (20%) Parcel 014-50 1,584,000 Pond (64,000) 1,216,000 $0.050/s.f. $ 60,800 66,000 $0.050/s.f. 3,300 Future R/W (20%) Parcel 014-51 176,000 Pond (74,000) 102,000 $0.050/s.f. 5,100 SE% SECTION 26 Parcel 018-75 1,050 --- 1,050 $0.050/s.f. 53 Parcel 019-75 2,475 --- 2,475 $0.050/s.f. 124 Parcel 020-75 12,000 --- 12,000 $0.050/s.f. 600 Parcel 021-75 3,600 --- 3,600 $0.050/,s.f. 180 Parcel 022-75 3,400 --- 3,400 $0.050/s.f. 170 Parcel 021-77 123,000 Pond (37,000) 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 1,650 Large Lot Parcel 030-77 52,000 Large Lot 24,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,247 SA SECTION 26 Parcel 010-51 261,360 Pond (20,000) 193,090 $0.050/s.f. 9,655 Future R/W (20%) Parcel 020-51 94,500 Large Lot 40,380 $0.050/s.f. 2,019, Parcel 011-52 276,930 Pond (20,000) 205,550 $0.050/s.f. 10,278 Future R'/W (20%) Parcel 010-53 158,700 Large Lot 66,000 $0.050/s.f. 3,300 Page 11. 5153d 7y S WILDERNESS RETREAT Lot 1, 013-00 Part of Lot 5, 055-00 Part of Lot 5, 051-00 Part of Lot 5, 052-00, LAKEWOOD HILLS Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 8 5153d 234,000 Pond Total 82,500 Assessable Lot Large Parcel Lot Area Credit Area Assessment Total Description 106,840 (sq..ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment Parcel 020-53 133,500 ---- 133,500 $0.050/s.f. 6,675 Parcel 010-54 330,000 Future R/W (20%) 264,000 $0.050/s.f. 13,200 Parcel 013-55 145,200 Pond (56,000) 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 1,650 Large Lot Parcel 014-55 222,750 Pond (72,000) 66,000 $0,.050/s.f. 3,300 Large Lot Parcel 010-56 414,510 Future R/W (20%) 331,610 $0.050/s.f. 16,581 WILDERNESS RETREAT Lot 1, 013-00 Part of Lot 5, 055-00 Part of Lot 5, 051-00 Part of Lot 5, 052-00, LAKEWOOD HILLS Lot 1 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lot 4 Lot 5 Lot 6 Lot 7 Lot 8 5153d 234,000 Pond (32,000) 82,500 $0.50/s.f. Lot Large Lot Lot 190,000 384,120 Pond (74,000) 248,090 $0.050/s.f. 106,840 Future R/W (20%) Large 225,000 Pond (78,410) 65,410 $0.050/s.f. Large Large Lot Large Lot 150,000 Pond (7,000) 61,820 $0.050/s.f. Large Lot 64,710 Large Lot 38,100 Large Lot 38,700 Large Lot 190,000 Pond (66,000) Large Lot 106,840 Pond (60,000) Large Lot 102,800 Pond (32,000) Large Lot 23,290 Large Lot 24,760 Large Lot Page 12. 73 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 16,500 $0,:050/s.f. 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 49,500 $0.050/s.f. 19,780 $0.050/s.f. 33,000 $0.050/s.f 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 4,125 AD 12,400 3,271(1) 3,091(1) 1,650 825 825 2,475 989 1,650 825 825 Page 13. 5153d /6 Total Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Assessment Total Description (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment Lot 9 23,580 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825 Lot 10 65,200 Large Lot 33,000 $0.050/s.f. 1,650(1) Lot 11 24,750 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 12 19,200 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 13 34,400 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 14 54,400 Large Lot 27,340 $0.050/s.f. 1,367(1) Lot 15 185,400 Pond (16,000) 66,000 $0.050/s.f. 3,300(1) Large Lot Lot 16 64,350 Pond (37,600) 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Large Lot Lot 17 63,840 Pond (32,800) 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Large Lot Lot 18 54,000 Pond (8,000) 18,940 $0.050/s.f. 947(1) Large Lot Lot 19 30,000 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Lot 20 48,230 Pond (2,500) 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825(1) Large Lot OAK POND HILLS Lot 1, Block 1 46,800 Large Lot 19,740 $0.050/s.f. $ 987(1) Lot 2, Block 1 44,000 Large Lot 16,940 $0.050/s.f. 847 Lot 1, Block 2 43,560 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. $ 825(1) Lot 2, Block 2 44,000 Large Lot 16,940 $0.050/s.f. 847 Page 13. 5153d /6 Total Assessable Parcel Area Credit Area Assessment Total Description (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 54,000 Large Lot 26,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,347 Lot 2, Block 1 50,000 Large Lot 22,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,147 Lot 3, Block 1 74,000 Large Lot 30,440 $0.050/s.f. 1,522 Lot 4, Block 1 50,000 Large Lot 22,940 $0.050/s.f. 1,147 Lot 1, Block 2 43,650 Large Lot 16,500 $0.050/s.f. 825 Lot 2, Block 2 44,000 Large Lot 16,940 $0.050/s.f. 847 TOTAL (BASE PROJECT) ............ $172,525 TOTAL (INCLUDES ALTERNATE 1) ..... $193,738 (1) Total assessment if alternate is approved. 9 • Page 14. 5153d 75, , • HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET LIFT STATION AND FORCERAAIN PROJECT 444 R EAGAN,MJNNESOTA 1 v 80NESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minnesota Date: 5/15/86 Comm. 49355 Fig. No. 1 n 0 co 3 0 3 m z cil m co 1y 0 {w -4 c D 0 a c y O 0 ro m n0 D y m -im mz mm �'m z w 0m_' c "'(D zD N H o z O m r x DAKOTA COUNTY PARK wl)ONOUGN LAKE \ LP -45 0 600 NORTH SCALE IN FEET WD LP -34 4 882,7 w 0 O m m > m 0 m r 191m D r D m m z D m 0 v O m w 0 3 m z Cn m y co c') N chw0Dm 0 P6 -i ER CD O M 0 C NO E�0M 3> o n 0 co m m' >0-im mm mz m. S y m Z oCD _' 0 » m z .> q C7 Z N v m HOLLAND LAKE LP -76 LIFT STATION 81 FORCEMAIN V-69 it POND LP -61 $UDBERRY LN_ `�, erg eee. 6• Ex. OVERLAND FLOW DAKOTA COUNTY PARK 0 600 SCALE IN FEET 12' McDONOUGM LAKE LP -t9 NOR TM POND V rN N« eez.r HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET ASSESSMENT AREA PROJECT 444R EAGAN, MINNESOTA L LE BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minnesota D ate: 5/15/86 Comm. 49355 Fig' No. 3 ®- RIF y I� a z Dc w ' I— J Q I Q = LU r _ o Q z C z w L ' N w U) to Q o O -m r BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK f 8 HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET ASSOCIATES, INC. ASSESSMENT AREA — ALTERNATE Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minnesota PROJECT 444R Date: 5% 15/86 EAGAN,MNNESOTA Comm. 49355 Fig• No.3 ALT. Agenda Information Memo -June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One • • s TAX INCREMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCING PLAN/SPERRY PROJECT A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development District #1 --At the May 21, 1986, City Council meeting a public hearing was held to consider and review the Sperry Tax Increment Financing Plan for Economic Development District #1. The amount of the tax increment financing is $700,000..00 which will be used for related public improvements to the Sperry Project. The tax increment financing is structured so that 508 of the new tax increment will be used to pay off the $700,000.00 T.I.F. bonds, while the remaining 508 increment that is generated by the new project will go directly into the tax base so that all taxing jurisdictions will realize the immediate benefit of increased taxes. At the May 21 City Council meeting, final action on the Economic Development District #1 planned and the development program could not be taken due to the statutory requirement to notify both the school district, which is Independent School District 196 and Dakota County, to learn if they had any objections or concerns about the proposed tax increment financing. There has been no correspondence or communication from either jurisdictions since the letters and documents were sent out in mid-May. Therefore action to consider both the development program and tax increment financing plan for Economic Development District #1 is in order for consideration. Enclosed is a copy of the plan and program that was presented as a part of the May 21 City Council packet. Also enclosed is a copy of a development agreement, but the City Administrator suggest it be drafted by both Council and the City Attorney's Office_ This development agreement provides additional protection to the City of Eagan and provides clarification on the City's commitment and how funds will be disbursed as a part of the tax increment financing program. A copy of that agreement is Z3I.Tenclosed on pages0'/ through 4Z3_1- There here has been a great deal of news on the Sperry/Burroughs merger, and if members of the City Council have any specific questions regarding the recent acquisition of the Sperry Corporation by Burroughs, Mr. Ed Michaud will be present at the City Council meeting on Tuesday. There was also an article that appeared this F/ Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two past week in the Minneapolis paper suggesting that the semiconductor plant may be sold. According to Mr. Michaud "to his knowledge Sperry Corporation is not considering the sale of the semi -conductor facility; however, due to the competition in the world of semi -conductors, they are looking for a partner to enhance their high technology research capabilities to remain competitive in the industry". He also indicated that with the recent merger of Burroughs there is even a stronger desire to maintain the semi -conductor facility at its present location and possibly utilize semi -conductor technology that the Burroughs Corporation can offer. Grading has been continuing along on the site for the Sales and Marketing facility and according to Mr. Michaud steel for the building was ordered this past week allowing the project to continue on schedule. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax increment financing development program and plan for the Economic Development District #1 or the Sperry Sales and Marketing facility. • CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA Tax Increment Financing Plan Economic Development District #1 May 6, 1986 r TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1 BACKGROUND ................................................ 1 DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ....................................... 1 Objectives ........................................... 1 Project Description .................................. 2 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 2 Statutory Authorization .............................. 2 ® Basis for Findings ................................... 3 District Certification and Duration of Tax Increment Financing District ....................... 3 Prior Planned Improvements ........................... 4 Original Assessed Value ............................... 4 Bonded Indebtedness .................................. 4 Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment .. 4 Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds 5 ;. Uses of Tax Increment ......... Additional Financings ................................ 5 Fiscal Disparities ................................... 6 Impact on Other Taxing. Jurisdictions ................. 6 EXHIBIT A - Development Program for Economic Development • District No. 1 .................................. A-1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT No. 1 CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION This Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the City of Eagan, Minnesota (the "City") under the requirements of the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act (the "Act"), Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78. The City herein proposes and describes the establishment of a Tax Incre- ment Financing District within the coterminous Economic Develop- ment District No. 1, for purposes of financing public improve- ments required to support a major private -sector development, consisting of a proposal by Sperry Corporation to construct and operate a 295,000 square foot office and computer center and related facilities (the "Improvements"). BACKGROUND The City Council has called for a public hearing on the "3 formation of both Economic Development District No. 1 and the Tax Increment Financing District, for May 21, 1986. On June 17, 1986, subject to public input, the Council will consider both the Development Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Economic Development District No. 1 is being established as a Development District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. A copy of the proposed Development Program for Economic Development District No. 1 and a legal description of the District are attached as an Exhibit to this Plan and are hereby incorporated by reference as part of this Plan. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Objectives The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in establishing Economic Development District No. 1 are as follows: 1. To promote and secure the prompt development of a major office and technology facility contributing to the tax base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. To reduce the cost of manner permitting the completion economic basis. development of property in a of a facility on an • 3. To secure the construction and provide monies for the payment of the costs of public improvements in and adjacent to the District, which are necessary for the orderly and complete development of the District in a manner which will promote the attractiveness of the area and promote public safety. 4. To promote economic development which will add to the employment opportunities in the community, and add to the tax base of the community by increasing taxable values and increasing the need for commercial development. Project Description The actions expected to be taken by the City within the Economic Development District No. 1 include: acquisition and in- stallation of traffic signals, construction of new bicycle paths, construction of new utility laterals (including water, sanitary and storm sewers) and other project improvements consistent with the objectives of the Development Program. Further details of the specific public actions are included in the Development Program of the Project, appended to this Plan. No land will be acquired by the City in connection wi'-h the Development Program. No contracts have been entered into at this time in connection C"I with any such development activities. Anticipated private developments within Economic Development District No. 1 include the construction and operation of a 295,000 square foot office and computer center by Sperry Corporation, the owners of the property within the District. It is expected that construction on this Development will commence in the summer of 1986, and be completed at the end of 1987, and ® have a final estimated market value of approximately $15,100,000. Further details of this project are included in the Development Program of the Project, appended to this Plan. TAY INCREMENT FINANCING Statutory Authorization Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the City is authorized to create the Tax Increment Financing District coterminous with Economic Development District No. 1, to issue the Bonds to finance public improvements within the Project for the purpose of stimulating private development and to utilize tax increments captured from the Tax Increment Financing District due to new private development to meet debt service obligations on these Bonds. Basis for Findinas The City has established the following facts: a) The parcel of land within the District (as identi- fied in Exhibit A) is owned by Sperry Corporation. With the inducement provided by the Development Program and the offer of a,$1 million low-interest loan by the State of Minnesota, Sperry Corporation is expected to construct the Development. The Development is expected to have a value of approximately $15,100,000 and have approximately 700 employees. The Tax Increment Financing District therefore qualifies as an "Economic Development" district under Statutes 273.73, Subdivision 12. b) The Development Program for Economic Development • District No. 1, and this Plan, have been reviewed by the Planning Commission of the City, and found to be in conformance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City. c) The opportunity and feasibility for development of Economic Development District No. 1 by private parties is maximized through the use of tax increment financing. Given the unavailability of funding from other governmental sources other than the $1 million low-interest loan offered by the State of Minnesota and the necessity of the improve- ments to be constructed as an inducement to the Development, the use of tax increment financing will maximize the development opportunities within Economic Development District No. 1. d) Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3, of the • Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for the City under the Fiscal Disparities requirements (Chapter 473F) will be applied against commercial/industrial properties within the Tax Increment Financing District. District Certification and Duration of Tax Increment Financing District The City expects to request a certification of this District in 1986, following a scheduled public hearing on May 21, 1986, and following a thirty -day review period by Dakota County and affected school districts. As an Economic Development Tax Increment Financing District, the maximum life of the District is the lesser of (i) eight years from the date of collection of the first increment, ;`' which is expected to be July, 1988, or (ii) 10 years from the 0— date of approval of this Tax Increment Financing Plan, which is expected to be June 17, 1986. The City retains the option of terminating the District upon the redemption of the Bonds. Prior Planned Improvements No building permits have been issued by the City for any parcels within the Tax Increment Financing District, in the first fifteen months of the eighteen month time period preceding the expected date of approval of the Tax Increment Financing District by the City. Original Assessed Value It is anticipated that the District will be approved on June 17, 1986, and that certification will be requested of the Dakota County Auditor soon thereafter. The Original Assessed Value of the District will therefore be the value assessed in 1986 for taxes payable in 1987. The original assessed valuation of the District has not yet been determined because the creation of the District will require identification of a new tax parcel, but it is expected that the original assessed value will not exceed $2 million at any time folloc.ing the adjustments required by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes. Pursuant to Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes, the Original Assessed Value of the District for each of the next 10 years will be required to be adjusted annually by the average percentage increase in the assessed valuation of the property included in the District during the previous five years. Bonded Indebtedness • It is currently anticipated that the City will issue the Bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $700,000. This amount includes enough capitalized interest to meet debt service obligations up to the point that sufficient tax increments are estimated to be generated to meet debt service obligations. Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment Current financial projections for the Tax Increment Financing District, based on assumptions that include an estimated final market value of the Improvements of $15,100,000, an estimated assessed valuation of the Improvements of $6,493,000, a constant mill rate of 102.138 mills, a fiscal disparities contribution ratio of 28.8877%, and the termination of the District in the year 1996, suggest that the total tax increment to be generated by the District will equal at least $400,000, of which $200,.000 will be retained by the City for payment of debt service on the Bonds. Assuming no inflation in property values after the g7 e Improvement's initial assessment, it is estimated that the District will have an annual Captured Assessed Values following completion of the Improvement $6,493,000, less any adjustment required by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes. Estimated Uses of Funds .It is estimated that the proceeds of the Bonds will be expended approximately as follows: Uses: Capitalized interest $ 63,555 Construction Costs for Improvements Traffic Signals $ 55,000 Bike Trail 32,000 Utilities and Other 535,482 622,482 Costs,.of Issuance Bond•Discount 7,000 6,963 $700,000 Uses of Tax Increments Under Section 273.75, Subdivision 4, of the Act, the City will use the tax increments generated from the Captured Assessed Value of the District to pay the principal and interest on the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements. Pursuant to Section 273.75, Subdivision 2, of the Act, the City elects to retain 100% of all increments collected, however,, to the extent that receipts of tax increment exceed the debt service require- ments for the bonds to be issued an amount up to 500 of the increments are expected to be returned to the County Auditor for distribution to affected taxing jurisdictions. Notwithstanding the above, the City retains the option, at any time during the life of the District, to retain some portion less than 100% of the annual tax increment, and pass on the remaining portion to the other taxing jurisdictions. The City also retains the option, pursuant to Section 273.74, Subdivision 4, of modifying this Plan to include further expenditures of tax increments for additional public purposes. Additional Financi The City presently anticipates no other additional financing for the District. • Fiscal Disparities Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3 of the Act, the City elects to utilize the method of computing Captured Assessed Value as defined under clause (b). Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Because the proposed Improvements are occurring con- tingent on the City's provision of the improvements contemplated by the Development Program as financed by tax increments, it is determined that this Tax Increment Financing District will have no impact on other taxing jurisdiction during the life of the District. The other jurisdictions will continue to receive property taxes from the District based on the Original Assessed ® Value, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with Section 273.76, Subd. 1 of the Act. At the termination of the District, the other taxing jurisdictions will receive the entire assessed value of the new development as part of their tax base. u DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM EAGAN TAX INCREMENT PROJECT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 A. STATEMENT OF INTENT It is the intent of the City of Eagan to organize a development district and undertake a development program within the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A, and to designate the project area as Development District No. 1 (the "District") for purposes of carrying out the improvements hereinafter described and establishing the project area as a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, in the financing of the improvements herein described. In particular, there has been presented to the City a plan for the construction of certain improvements in order to induce the construction of an office and computer center to provide employment opportunities and enhance the tax base of the City. B. STATEMENT OF NEED There is a need for new development in the City to provide employment opportunities, to increase the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state and the City. This need can be accomplished through the attraction of commercial and industrial development. In the case of the District, significant development can be attracted by the Program described herein. The action herein proposed to be taken by the City is found to have,a public purpose in accordance with Chapter 472A, Minnesota Statutes, and is necessary to meet those needs. C. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT AND TO The City has power to establish a tax increment financing district under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.78, and to undertake development programs as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. The City has authority under Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.03 to acquire, construct, recon- struct, improve, alter, extend, operate, maintain or promote developments aimed at improving the physical facilities, quality of life and quality of transportation. D. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in establishing its Development District No. 1 and in carrying out the Development Program for the District are as follows: E 1. To promote and secure,the prompt development of a major office and computer facility contributing to the tax base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. To reduce the cost of development of property in a manner permitting the completion of the facility on an economic basis. 3. To provide monies for the payment of the costs of improvements in and adjacent to the District, which are necessary for the orderly and complete development of the District and which will provide public safety. E. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITIES ® The objectives of this development district will be accomplished through the following actions by the City: 1. Purchase and install traffic signals at the intersection of Towerview Road and Pilot Knob Road and at the future main entrance intersection opposite Jurdy Road on Pilot Knob Road. 2. Construct bicycle trail improvement from Quarry Hill Park to Pilot Knob Park through the District. 3. New installation of utilities, including water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer. 4. Other project improvements within the Development • District which are consistent with the objectives of the Development Program, including fire loop, street, street lighting and site improvements. Sperry Corporation is expected to construct a 250,000 square foot office and computer facility in the northeast portion of the District. This facility is expected to employ approximately and to have a market value upon completion of approximately $15,100,000. F. LAND USE All development on lands in Economic Development District No. 1 will be subject to the following uses and requirements. 1. Permitted Uses Development District No. 1 is designated as Research and Development on the adopted Comprehensive Plan, and any IF/ A-2 permitted use in such areas as defined by the Eagan Compre- hensive Plan will be permitted, provided the use does not have a significant adverse effect on surrounding uses in terms of noise, traffic generation, congestion and appearance as determined by the City. The "Research and Development" classification provides special standards which promote compatibility with adjacent residential uses. 2. Additional Regulations and Controls or Restrictions to be Imposed. a. All new development shall conform to the applicable State and local codes and ordinances. G. DESIGN STANDARDS 1. Site Design Conformance with the Eagan Zoning Ordinance set forth in the Eagan City Code must be complied with reference to all site preparation, construction of buildings, parking areas, etc., landscaping and all other provisions thereof. 2. Required Documents The Public Works Director of the City of Eagan shall be provided with all documents that he may require including, but not limited to site plan, grading and storm drainage plans, utility and lighting plan and all otherhe deems necessary to determine the conformance of the proposed development with the design standards. 3. Comprehensive Plan The objectives of the City of Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan shall be adhered to in order to control the uses of the property, including economic viability, environmental impact, community facilities, parks and open space and transportation. H. LAND ACQUISITION No properties to be acquired by the City in connection with the Development Program. I. RELOCATION OF.DISPLACED PERSONS There is no relocation contemplated in Development District No. 1. J. MAINTENANCE OF PROJECT AREA The City Administrator shall be responsible for the administration of Development District No. 1 on behalf of the City of Eagan. K. GEOGRAPHIC MODIFICATION In accordance with M.S.A. 273.74, Subd. 4, the geo- graphic area of the District may be reduced but may not be enlarged after five (5) years following the date of the designation of the District. This District may, therefore, be expanded until 1991. Geographic modification shall be in accordance with M.S.A. 273.74. ® L. ATTACHMENTS There are attached hereto for further elucidation and description, the following maps and drawings: D E V E L O P M E N T A G R E E M E N T CITY OF EAGAN and SPERRY CORPORATION DATED: PARTIES: The CITY OF EAGAN, Dakota County, Minnesota, called "the City", and SPERRY CORPORATION, called "Sperry". RECITALS: 40 1. The City has formed an economic development district pursuant to Chapter 472A, Minnesota Statutes, and a tax increment financing district pursuant to Sections 273.71 to 273.78, Minnesota Statutes, known as Economic Development District No. 1, consisting of the property owned by Sperry described in Exhibit "A" hereto (the "District"). 2. The City has approved an economic Development Program for the District under which it proposes to undertake the public improvements described therein and in paragraph 1 hereof (the "Public Improvements"). 3. In consideration of the Development Program, Sperry intends to construct an approximately 295,000 square foot office and computer center and related facilities in the District (the "Private Development"). 4. The City intends to finance the economic Development Program with the issuance of $700,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1986 (the "Bonds"), which are intended to be repaid primarily from the proceeds of tax increments from the District. (��3A I COVENANTS: In consideration of the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, the City and Sperry hereby agree as follows: 1. Public Improvements. Subject to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 hereof, the City shall- acquire and construct the following Public Improvements in the District: a. Internal access roads b. Internal storm drainage ® C. Internal water distribution and fire loop system including. hydrants and valves a. Internal sanitary sewer collection systems e. Semaphore traffic signals at Pilot Knob Road/Tower View Road f. Internal bicycle/pedestrian trail 2. A Public Improvement Project. Except for the semaphore traffic signals, and bicycle/pedestrian trail, which shall be designed, constructed ® and installed to the City's specifications, Sperry shall furnish plans and specifications and contract documents for the Public Improvements to the City. If such plans and specifications and contract documents are acceptable to the City, the City shall advertise for bids and award contracts for the work in accordance with.any applicable public bidding requirements. The work on the Public Improvements shall commence and proceed at such times and in such manner as shall be necessary, in the judgment of Sperry, to permit completion of the Private Development in an expeditious manner. Sperry or any contractor employed by Sperry shall be eligible to submit a bid for such Public Improvements. /vB 2 3. Supervision by Sperry. Any contract shall provide that the contractor is subject to the direction of Sperry or its agents in the performance of the work. In the event the work is defective or in the event of default by any contractor, the City shall, at the reasonable request and expense of Sperry, pursue any remedies available under the contracts for the benefit of Sperry which costs shall be paid by Sperry. Sperry shall provide access to its property in the District to permit construction of the Public Improvements. The terms of such access may be part of the plans and specifications. 4. Limit of City Responsibility. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the City shall have no obligation to pay more than the aggregate amount for the Public Improvements. It is understood that the tax increment bonds provided under paragraph 5 shall cover the aggregate total of all issuance costs, bona discount costs, capitalized interest, semaphore installation and trail improvements which total amounts may not be determined for a substantial time following the issuance of the bonds. Sperry hereby agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless for all expenditures and liabilities of the City in connection with the Public Improvements in excess of $700-,000.00 less the future costs for the semaphore and trail installation and all City issuance expenses. 5. Issuance of Bonds. The City's obligation under paragraph 2 is also subject to the ability of the City to issue $700,000 of general obligation tax increment bonds to provide funds for the Development Program. The City shall use its best efforts to issue such bonds prior to August 15, 1986. 6. Failure to Complete. Sperry agrees to construct the Private Development substantially in accordance with the scale and scope of the Private Developments as described in preliminary designs furnished to the 93� 3 • • City. In the event Sperry fails to complete such Private Developments by 19_, Sperry shall reimburse the City for amounts expended by the City on the Public Improvements, related City costs and interest expenses on the Bonds which the City does not recover from earnings on investments and tax increment from the District. 7. Design Charges. It is understood that the cost of preparing the plans and specifications for the public improvements including the future semaphores and park trail improvements shall/shall not be included in the finances proposed under this Agreement. . 8. Schedule. Projected schedule for the Public Improvements is as follows: City Council Approval of Plans and Advertise for bids May 21, 1986 Opening of bids June 13, 1986 Award of Contract by City Council June 17, 1986 Substantial Completion Nov. 15, 1986 Final Completion June 1, 1987 9. Termination. In the event that the Private Development is terminated for any reason prior to or during the course of construction of the Public Improvement project or the construction of the office and computer facility then Sperry shall pay the City upon the request of the City for all costs incurred by the City including the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds and all costs involved in the design and construction of the public improvements and administrative, engineering, legal and all other costs incurred by the City in relation thereto. 10. Approvals. It is understood that Sperry or its designated representatives shall mutually approve all payment requests and/or changes for the Public Improvements intended to be installed according to this agreement. (73,D 4 11. Hold Harmless. Except for the duties and responsibilities of the City involved in the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds, and the responsibilities of the City specified under this Agreement for Public Improvements, the City shall have no further responsibility for acquisition of and compliance with permits required ,under paragraph 13, or the design, construction and inspection of the Public Improvements or the Private Development and Sperry, its successors and assigns shall hold the City, its agents and representatives harmless from any and all claims or causes of action which may result from the construction of the public improvements and the private development contemplated under this agreement. 12. Completion of Project. At such time as all the Public Improvements and the Private Development contemplated under this Agreement are completed, the City will assign all of its right, title and interest in such improvements to Sperry and the City shall then have no further responsibility under this agreement. 13. Permits and Licenses. Sperry shall acquire all necessary permits, licenses and approvals for the construction and development of the office and computer center and related facilities contemplated under this Agreement whether from the State of Minnesota, City of Eagan or any other applicable public agency. 14. Waiver of Objections. Sperry hereby waives notice of any and all hearings required and waives any and all objections and appeals pursuant to M.S.A. 9 429. 15. Recording. The undersigned hereby agree that this Agreement may be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder and that the parties shall execute any and all documents necessary to implement the recording of this Agreement including the delivery of the owners duplicate certificate of title to the affected lands if necessary. 5 16. Successors and Assigns. The undersigned hereby agree that this Agreement shall run with the affected land described in Exhibit "A". and bind the heirs, successors and assigns of such land until terminated by written agreement of the parties hereto. 17. Affected Parties. The undersigned include all the persons, firms or corporations that hold an interest in or are involved in this Agreement and the undersigned officials are authorized to sign this Agreement and to bind the respective parties. ® 18. Copy of the Agreement. Each of the parties heretohas read this Agreement and has received acopy thereof and agrees to execute any and all documents necessary to implement the terms of this Agreement. 19. Notices. Notices required or authorized to be given hereunder, until written notice of change of offices or addresses is given to all parties concerned, shall begivenas follows: City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Sperry Corporation 20. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by written agreement of the parties. 21. Remedies of the Parties.. The terms of this Agreement shall be legally enforceable by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction andeach of the parties retains the right to assert any legal, equitable, or administrative right of action or defense which may be available by law in order to implement or enforce the terms of this Agreement. gi3F IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement, consisting of eight (8) pages, including the following page, to be executed by the signature of their duly authorized officers, as of the date first written above. CITY OF EAGAN (Date: By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Approved as to Form: Eagan City Attorney (Date: ) Approved as to Content: Director of Public Works (Date: ) Approved as to Content: City Administrator (Dated: ) THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Hauge, Eide n Keller, P. A. Attorneys for the City of Eagan 1200 Yankee Doodle Road Water View Office Tower, Suite 303 Eagan, MN 55123 (612) 456-9000 7 SPERRY CORPORATION By: / ®. Date Its: By: / Date Its By: / Date Its: And: / Date �• Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared BEATTA BLOMQUIST and E. J. VanOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the CITY OF EAGAN, the municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipality by authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality. (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA) as. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public within ana for said County personally appeared ana to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn that they are respectively the ana of the Corporation named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said • corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and deed of the corporation. (S E A L) 93f� SPERRY PARK all auu � rta. �1� r 1 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70 B The Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/ Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986 City Council meeting authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action continued the license to allow for a public hearing.and potential amendmend to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm five (5) off -sale liquor license or remove the ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor license to be granted within the communi- ty. If action is taken under Item A public hearing to remove the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications this license can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the five (5) then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing the off -sale liquor license maximum from four to five as acted upon by the City Council at the May 6 meeting. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the application and police officer's report that were included with the May 21 packet. e�Z ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor- license for Curtis O. Johnson for location of the Town Centre/Eagan.Shopping Center. e�Z Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION CUL DE SAC RECONSIDERATION C. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition -Cul de ,Sac Reconsideration -- At the May 20 Council meeting, the Council considered a request from the Opus Corporation regarding the requirement to eliminate the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac from the proposed Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition. This item was continued until the June 17 meeting to allow proper representation and background justification for this request. Enclosed on pages �24 and is a letter justifying this request. Enclosed on pages and are the two configurations of the proposed final plat„ with nd without the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac. Enclosed on page -,� is a copy of the minutes from the December 3 Council meeting, where the original discussion took place that resulted in the cul de sac being eliminated as a condition of final plat approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the de- veloper's request to plat a public right-of-way cul de sac, servic- ing Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition. I OPUS CORPORATION DESIGNERS 4 BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS ' 1 ii3g June 11, 1986 Mr. Tom Colbert Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Trapp Road Cul -de -Sac Dear Mr. Colbert: Reference is made to your letter of May 30, 1986 requesting more background information in support of our proposed cul-de-sac off of • Trapp Road which the Council voted to eliminate from our plat of Eagandale Park 3rd Addition a few weeks ago. We, at Opus, understand the Council's position on construction of new cul -de -.sacs within the city of Eagan. However, we feel an exception to this position should be considered in relation to this proposed cul-de-sac which is designed to service the cluster of offices proposed for the northwest corner of Eagandale Business Center. The State Highway Department's requirements for additional right-of-way from the northerly lots of the Business Center for extension of I-494 made it necessary to realign Trapp Road east of Pilot Knob and reconfigure the lots it was originally designed to service. In addition, when the new interchange for 35E and I-494 was constructed, our old direct front door Highway 55 access was significantly altered. To compensate for these highway related changes, we relocated our ® entrance for the Business Center to Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive. To enhance this new entrance into the Center for customers and owners, we reconfigured the alignment of Corporate Center Drive, resized and configured the old lots into new accessible parcels and created a master development plan that would place our highest image buildings (offices and hotel) at this new entrance to the Center. Our intent was to create a new sense of place and identity for the new businesses locating in the vacinity of Pilot Knob, Trapp Road and Corporate Center Drive. The use of a common drive, exciting architecture and landscaping helps achieve these ,objectives. That is why the "Trapp Court" cul-de-sac was and is being proposed for the area as shown on the plat of Eagandale 3rd Addition. We used this concept of high visibility and convenient public access from Pilot Knob and Trapp Road to sell Sperry on the site that they are currently developing. It should also be pointed Out that this is the only cul-de-sac that is being proposed for all of the undeveloped property in this northwest section of the Business Center. Given the design and land development objectives that we are currently fulfilling in this area of the Center, we feel the cul-de-sac should be approved. Please call if you have questions Z would hope that the explanation OPUS AND AFFILIATES IN MINNEAPOLIS • CHICAGO -PHOENIX. MILWAUKEE -TAMPA - PENSACOLA EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 800 OPUS CENTER 49900 BREN ROAD EAST 4 PO BOX 150-MINN EAPOL IS. MINNESOTA 55440 (612)936-4444 I Mr. Tom Colbert June 11, 1986 Page 2 given herein to justify the Trapp Court cul—de—sac is sufficient to warrant your support at the June 17 Council Meeting. Bees�t" Regards, Robert A. Worthington, AICP Executive Director — Governmental Affairs RAW: jo cc: Tom Davis Tom Hedges 97 OPUS CORPORATION /JY PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION 41`% f-trr_ T • r� • � LOT 9 �J � y.ru- -: ✓. / 1 :.i Council Minutes December 3, 1985 YORKTON I S YORRTON II - IR FINANCING The final resolutions for the proposed industrial revenue bond issues for Yorkton I and Yorkton II'vere submitted and the applicant requested approval. Mike Gresser appeared for the applicant and Tom Hedges indicated that the City has not received a letter from bond counsel satisfying the City staff's concerns that the bonds could become taxable due to the procedural variance required for the application. In addition, the final documents for the bond project had not been received for review by the City Administrator or City Attorney. After discussion, Egan moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the final resolutions for the two bona issues, each in the sum of $600,000.00, subject however, to submission and approval by the City staff of. the bond counsel letter described above, and approval of the final transcript for the bond issues. All voted yes. EAGANDAIM INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The application for preliminary plat approval of Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition consisting of a replat of Eagandale Industrial Park Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 2, came to the Council. The APC recommended approval at its November 26, 1985 meeting, subject to certain conditions. The plat would combine four existing lots and three new lots, north of Corporate Center Drive *_ and west of Trapp Road, according to Dale Runkle. There was considerable:` discussion concerning the cul-de-sac proposed to be converted to a private cross easement built to City standards. Gerald Sunde of Sunde Engineering was present and recommended that the cul-de-sac remain a public street. After review, Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the preliminary plat application for Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The proposed public cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and a private street be provided for access to the lots. 2. The owner and developer will be responsible for any damage to any retaining wall and grading damages as a result of necessary maintenance of the City's storm and sanitary sewer lines within the sanitary and storm sewer easement along the southwesterly boundary of the property. 3. The watermain that the developer proposes to construct shall be built in accordance .with City specifications and properly verified that the contractor adhered to City standards. 4. This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary MWCC connection permits. .5. The cul-de-sac, Trapp Court, shall be constructed in accordance with City standards for a tear drop design and 9 ton standards. 6. This development shall dedicate a 20 foot utility and drainage easement adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way. /610 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN REGULATIONS D. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign Regulations --At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the City staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections of city collector and/or county roads. The policy was presented at the April 1, 1986 City Council meeting for review and considera- tion. For a copy of a memo of direction by the City Administrator and a study completed by the Sign Inspector and Chief Building Inspector, refer to pages /07/ through j�. Following review and consideration of the temporary advertising signs policy, Councilmember Ellison suggested "that one sign be permitted at each intersection which would include several developers and one standard with each developer potentially being able to place a sign on more then one standard . After discussion, Smith moved, Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the policy with the request that staff review the proposal and prepare and submit guidelines regarding locations, sizes, costs, color priorities and users to the City Council for later consideration. All voted yea." Following the motion, specific direction was given to the City Administrator which is outlined in the attached memo enclosed on pages /6-5, through L� to the Chief Building Inspector. Mr. Borgschatz has responded to the April 4 memo;, and for a copy of his findings, refer to pages /D through ® The cost projected for a steel sign seems high, however, individual signs that are being purchased and placed by developers throughout the community at various intersections are expensive and in some cases might compete with the cost for one reader board. There are many considerations, such as 1) The City monitoring the program as outlined by our Sign Inspector, 2) to adopt by ordinance a temporary advertising sign and then submit a request for proposal and allow various sign companies to bid on the reader board and manage the same for the City of Eagan. In other words, a developer would contact the sign company directly and buy time on the reader board at the quote presented to the City. 3) Developers will be restricted with the information that can be placed on a reader board, eliminating use of their logo and other marketing informa- tion. 4) Steel signs are certainly more expensive then signs but require much less maintenance. The City could erect the reader board signs during winter months, therefore providing both the management and construction/installation service. Reader boards at strategic locations, throughout the City would eliminate numerous temporary advertising signs. that are being placed by developers and builders. Additional philosophy should be considered regarding 1) the amount of regulatory control the /D / Agenda Information Memo June 17, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six TEMP ADVERTISING SIGNS CONT'D City desires to place on builders and developers advertising their business within the City. 2) If additional regulatory control is desired, whether the City or private sector should manage the installation of the signs. Because of the investment certain developers and builders have made in temporary advertising signs,, any change in policy might require either a sunset or grandfather provision, to slowly eliminate those signs that are currently in existence while freezing any replacement of new temporary advertising signs. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To discuss and provide addi- tional direction as to whether the City wishes to amend its Sign Ordinance by regulating the use of reader boards for any and all temporary advertising signs throughout the City. /0/R MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986 SUBJECT: NEW POLICY FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION AND LOCATION OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at their regular meeting held on Tuesday, January 7, 1986, staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections of City collector and/or County roads. The City Council commends your department on the excellent work that Elmer Borgschatz and you have performed in tightening up and carrying out regulatory provisions set for the location of signs throughout the City. In a discussion at the meeting, it is the desire of the City Council to develop additional policy that will further tighten up the location of temporary ® advertising signs throughout the City. First, the City Council would like an inventory of signs that are located on major City collector roads such as Blackhawk and all County roads throughout the City. This inventory or list of existing signs would include the duration (what amount of time is remaining of the two-year, temporary status) and the quality of the existing sign. Secondly, the City Council is asking that the policy for consider- ation include several of the following points: 1) temporary advertising signs must be placed in a specific location not to block any sight distance or view for the motorist; 2) consider- ation should be given to the adoption of criteria that would establish a distance between temporary advertising signs (much the same as general advertising) for aesthetic purposes; 3) a require- ment would exist that all adjacent property owners must be notified and provide consent for the placement of a temporary advertising sign; 4) the size and type of structure for a temporary advertising sign should again be reviewed; 5) consideration should be given to criteria that would establish a maintenance provision allowing City staff to require certain on-going maintenance of a temporary advertising sign; and 6) other conditions that might be suitable for a new temporary sign policy. The City Council would like the inventory completed and a policy to review by the first meeting in March. With the amount of growth that is occurring, we anticipate the request for many more temporary advertising signs; therefore, there is some urgency in preparing a new policy for City Council consideration. City Administrator TLH/kf �6y Agenda Information Memo April 1, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven REVIEW CURRENT POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS B. Review of Current Policy for Temporary Advertising Signs --The City staff was directed, at a recent City Council meeting, to inventory all temporary advertising signs on major collector roads throughout the city. Further action taken at the January 7, 1986, City Council meeting directed the City staff to prepare options for revisions to the sign ordinance and sign policy concerning advertis- ing directional signs. Procedure requiring acceptable maintenance conditions has been established by the Protective Inspections Department along with an inventory that was completed and copied to each member of the City Council during early March. There are many regulatory alternatives to review, however, the three (3) options listed in the Chief Building Official's Report were as follows: Option 1. Leave the City Code 4.20 subdivision 1C9 and allow the City Council to grant special permits using the criteria of City 4.20 subdivisions 2 & 3 which establish setbacks and standards. Option 2: Limit temporary signs to a one-year maxi -mum time span, limited to Eagan developments only, area limitation of 24 sq.feet, limit top edge of sign at • 9 feet above street level, limit bottom edge of sign to 6 feet above s.ze�' level, a limit of two (2) signs per intersection corner, and a minimum of 50 feet separation between signs. Option 3: An immediate moratorium on all temporary advertising signs and phase out existing signs as permits expire. Enclosed on page�. is a copy of the sign survey of 31 inter- sections in EaganIf any member of the City Council has misplaced the specific sign locations, an additional copy can be made avail- able. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or suggest a regulatory change for the control and issuance of temporary adver- tising signs. SIGN SURVEY OF THIRTY ONE INTERSECTIONS IN EAGAN Hwy 149 -& Lone Oak Rd -- No sign Hwy 149 -& Yankee Doodle - 1 sign ( 3 sised, in sw corner Dodd Rd -& Diffley - 2 " ( SW corner ) Hwy 3 -& Diffley - 1 " ( SW corner, Homeowners Produce for sale) no permit Cliff Rd-& Hwy 3 - 1 " ( SW corner ) Cliff Rd & Dodd Rd - 2 " ( 1 in NIB, 1 in NE corner) Cliff Rd & Lexington - 2 " ( NE corner ) Cliff Rd & Pilot Knob - 3 " ( NW corner ) Cliff Rd & Thomas Lake - 3 " ( 1 in NE , 2 in NW corner ) Cliff Rd & Safari B H - 2 " ( 1 in NE , 1 in S.E corner ) Cliff Rd & Johnny Cake - 1 " ( SE corner ) ® Cliff Rd & Galaxie - 1 " ( SE corner ) Cliff Rd & Rahn Rd - 3 " ( 3 in NE corner ) Cliff Rd & Nicols - 2 " ( 1 BP in NE corner, 1 BP in SE Corner ) Cliff Rd & Slater - 1 " ( 1 in SW corner Service station sign pending) Cliff Rd & Cinamin Ridge - Q " ( no sign ) Cedar Ridge & Shale - 0 " ( no sign ) Blackhawk &0 �Y 3 - 3 It (3 in SW corner) Diffley & Thomas Lake - 2 It ( 1 in NW , 1 in NE corner ) Diffley & Pilot Knob - 5 " ( 2 in NW, 3 in NE corner ) Beerwood & Pilot Knob - 3 " ( 1 in NE corner , (3 2 in 5E corner Should be remov Diffley & Lexington - 7 " ( 1 in NE corner 6 in SE corner ) Diffley & Trenton - 4 ". (l.in SE corner, on Right/a/way & 3 signs in SW cor Wescott & Lexington - 2 " ( 2 in NW corner ) Yamkee Doodle * Lex. - 5 " ( 1 NW, 1 SW, 3 SE & 1 in NE corner ) Yankee Doodle &Pilot E,nob- 0 " ( 2 pylon signs , Hotel and Super America ) Yankee Doodle & Hwy 13 - 0 " Four Oaks & Hwy 13 - 1 " ( I sign NE corner) Lone Oak & Hwy 13 - 0 " Lone Oak & Pilot Knob - 1 " ( Blackhawk Glen - No permit ) Lone Oak & Lexington - 3 " ( 2 in SE , 1 in NE corner ) Summary 1 intersection, 7 signs 2 If 5 " 1 u 4 u s 6 3 7 " 2 If g u 1 u 6 " 0 Total 31 intersections 1 signs MEMO TO: CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 4, 1986 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY -OWNED/ STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS In official action that was taken by the City Council at their April 1, 1986, meeting, a concept was given consideration whereby the City would construct and install uniform, temporary advertising signs throughout approved locations within the City. These signs would be designed to accommodate several identification signs that would meet a specific specificationand design standard. Please make reference to the example that was prepared by City Council - member Ellison and is attached for your reference. The City Council is concerned about the number of temporary advertising signs that are located at busy intersections throughout the community. I would like you to give consideration to this new concept that was proposed by the City Council and determine the feasibility of the project. Please take into consideration the following: 1. Locations: It would be necessary to determine the loca- tions that are suitable for installing a City -owned stan- dardized sign. 2. Size: Please prepare a set of specifications that would standardize the sign and each reader board/identification sign. 3. Cost: Please estimate the cost for construction and installation of these signs. Also determine which each of the individual reader board/identifications would cost to construct and, further, what. is fair in terms of rental charges by the City. 4. Priority: Please determine a method in which the reader board/identification signs would be rented considering priority of space on the City sign and, further, the duration of time that those identification signs would be allowed. 5. Number of Signs: Please determine how many signs could be placed on one of the overall signs and, further, whether more than one size of sign 'should be given consideration. Please see #2 above. 6. Locations: Currently, a development is allowed two (2) temporary advertising signs in addition to any signs that are allowed on the subject development parcel. It would be necessary to determine the procedure for allowing a location and consideration for the two additional signs a developer might request. 7. Other Criteria: Please give consideration to any other criteria that might be appropriate in considering this project. �Q� It appears that the City Council would like to proceed with this concept for controlling and providing a beautification to temporary advertising signs throughout the. community. It would be necessary to provide some type of transition such as, requiring developers to remove their temporary advertising signs and possibly provide 'a free or reduced rent for the first year to off -set expenses. that they have incurred in the ,construction of their temporary adver- tising sign. Again,please give further assistance tact my office and either through our tants. City Administrator this priority consideration. If you need due to your departmental schedule, please con - I will provide some administrative assistance new intern or one of my Administrative Assis- cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers TLH/kf lQ a 0 <= Pt j4SAFAR►oAKsI HILLTOPPERS Omen IhDMPSDP, LOS 40 a MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM HEDGES . CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIIAL, DALE PETERSON FROM: ELMER A BORGSCHATZ DATE: JUNE 12, 1986 BE: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY OWNED/STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS In reference to memo dated April 4, 1986 we have gathered some information that may be helpful to study a program which could be considered to eliminate a problem relative to a reader board identification. I have been very much impressed by the concept, however there may be some pitfalls as we will allude to when we refer to the seven points set forth in your letter. • 1. LOCATIONS - I would estimate that six reader boards are needed to cover the present activity in the City. The developments are spread into most areas of the City, however it may be difficult to lease six prime spots as the use of right-of-ways would not be advisable. 2. SIZE - The attached sign detail by a reputable advertising company in Eagan meets the recommendation of the. Council, however the all -steel sign cost estimate also attached seems high. 3. COSTS - In accordance with estimates we have for an all steel constructed sign with steel posts, removable (12" x 72" adv. panels) which would include reflectorized panels would cost approximately $5,250 per unit. The land use cost is estimated at $600 per unit. $100 maintenance cost annually may be low. Assuming a ten-year life expectancy of the all -steel sign, the following ® calculations indicate the projected income necessary to provide the service: To meet the annual costs which would be change of script: 3 @ $1,143, depreciation of $525, interest of $525, lease Of site - $600 and $100 for maintenance for a total of $2,893. A monthly rental fee of $33 per panel would be necessary. 4. PRIORITY - It is suggested that the reader board be leased to the applicants who have shown the greatest activity in number of units processed in the preceding six months. 5. NUMBER OF SIGNS - We believe that signs should be uniform for aesthetic values. At the moment, it would seem difficult to locate more than six signs in strategic locations within the City. Six signs filled would allow for 48 users and not knowing the acceptance by the industry, the outlay of approximately $36,000 looks large. 6. LOCATION - It is our contention that location could be found for six good spots. I believe Council and management could be a better judge of the temporary advertising needs, hopefuLly the reader board would eliminate part of the problem. /Q 7. OTHER CRITERIA - Space on the reader board on an annual basis, if renewals are wanted, arrangements and fees should be made 30 days before expiration. Vacancies do not destroy the effect of the board. EB/js • ----- ---1111r=aiiur--_---- FABRICATORS DESIGNERS �Jo June 6, 1986 Mr. Elmer Borgschatz City of Eagan ® 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 • -�,��sri�ence h1c. 945 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE • 488.6711 • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551C RE: Twin post directional signs Dear Elmer: To furnish and install a 161 tall twin post structure with eight double faced directional panels as shown on Drawing #86-R-193, our price to you is $4,737.00. For optional reflective copy, add $512.00. The following is a cost breakdown for your review: Poles Reflective 12" x 7211 D/F panels Non -reflective 1211 x 72" DIF panels Sincerely, LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC. Mike Gifford MG:ds Furnished 700.00 Installed Total 1300.00 2000.00 291.00 90.00 381.00 227.00 90.00 317.00 0 .TOP V IE W o J 1! nflkss ftes 17, AWN. PAVELS AYDSQ. NBf! 0 0�0 CT002 ll lll'lLLi��l5001SC4J L�00 � �OFUGTafBIED Com' _ -- AYV µYD�IL WNIiG ' AA DK. WmN2E' FR6iT ViEw 4W �LLuy. ntiF� PriON D�f / nkee��are �Oe�te� II r•B 1! d d � a Agenda Information Memo June 17,, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MINNESOTA BANK EAGAN A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) for a Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their May 27, 1986 meeting, to consider an application submitted by the Minnesota Bank Eagan for a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign located on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition. The APC is recommending approval, subject to condi- tions set forth in the staff report. Enclosed on pages //3 through / is a copy of the Planning Department report as • it pertains to this application. Also enclosed on page(s)//94#7 is a copy of the minutes from the APC meeting concerning this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign along Yankee Doodle Road in the Bicentennial Addition. �/L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PYLON SIGN APPLICANT: MN BANK EAGAN LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: NB (UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a pylon sign located on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition. COMMENTS: In the initial review, the Planning Department has determined that a Variance as well as a Conditional Use Permit would be required in order to allow a pylon sign for Minnesota Bank Eagan. Presently, there exists only 127' to the existing standard pylon sign and approximately 225' to the existing Super America sign. Therefore, any location elected for construction of this sign on the Minnesota Bank Eagan site would be in violation of the spacing requirement of the sign ordinance. Minnesota Bank Eagan has come to the City because of the location and visibility of the bank from Yankee Doodle Road. Representatives of the bank feel a pylon sign would give much more visibility. ® They are requesting the Variance from the City in order to construct the sign which would consist of approximately 95sq. ft. and would have the Minnesota Bank Eagan logo plus an electronic reader board which would display advertising plus time and tempera- ture. The bank representatives feel that this pylon sign would get the added' visibility they need to bring customers to this branch bank facility.' If approved, the Conditional Use should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Variance from the 300' spacing shall be required. 2) The sign square footage shall be 95 sq. ft. or what is attached with the May 21 report. 3) Height shall be no more than 27' above ground level. DCR/jj //3 11] /�`__ NOOHSNIHE PM . FM 7 J Y •aurt �WMNI PMN cI i�� IQ¢ 1 ® of ri Fc Q "C r, XVj OLfdR OUNS oY�• 9¢ � �., I4 i L<uILF Q 141 ♦a/..f 0. br C0.0, L E c c 'NLP. -'pT 4' R-3 R-3 J:'�N c Nn i 1FEss� ryn�?Lom4O. 4 I y JNB yB y OP j r 4 i nlocEl-P .�y"- - PD JJJ NB. t.. I 30 ;a ��NpFEr P bn / j LE • I NCWXrs , I F'xXs Reda 175.2 C JF ^� CSC I ... Lc —JII I! RLM 108 R i4 IF 1•ir,. % � I l� 'I 16 (D Io .Vi r�1R% I� A, I P.p • • I 6 6 Minneso aDD Y Eagan aL,,,q }Y •e v. f �•,I•� si` � ISS � E ••• � �, � •• a �. • >. ���E• S•• • • • ••': Yir3/i �Ol ' � •Ci � y� \\ YantM Doodle Road ale EXISTING PYLON SIGN PYLON SIGN PROPOSAL Wer. M 4.r '!Y APC Minutes .May 27, 1986 SIGN ORDINANCE — FEDERAL LAND COMPANY TOWN CENTRE 70 a TOWN CENTRE 100 Chairperson McCrea opened the discussion requesting response from the Commissioners in regard to the need to review the Sign Ordinance and proposed amendments. City Planner Runkle introduced the information available regarding other area communities and their sign ordinances, along with a rough approximation of the maximum number of signs that could be allowed in the Town Centre 70 area, assuming the platting of the property that would allow such maximization. Discussion centered around whether a planned development could be'used to handle variances from the sign ordinance. It was suggested that the use of a planned development to allow variances from the sign ordinance would open the floodgates upon the sign ordinance restrictions. It was also argued that there are very few commercial planned developments in Eagan, thereby minimizing the impact of using the PD Agreement as a means of providing flexibility to the sign ordinance. The public hearing was.then convened. Mr. Charles Bartholdi appeared on behalf of Federal Land Company and indicated the willingness of Federal Land Company to enter into a Sign Agreement whereby the number of signs in Town Centre 100 would be restricted to 12 and the number of signs in Town Centre 70 to 16 signs. No one from the general public was present in regard to this issue and the public hearing was closed. After a lengthy discussion, Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the motion to direct the staff to work out a Sign Agreement with Federal Land Company whereby variances to the sign ordinance would be specified along with the locations of the proposed signs. A legal opinion in regard to the'use of sign agreements and/or planned developments in order to provide for variances from the Sign Ordinance was requested. The agreement and opinion are to be provided to the Planning Commission in time for its members to review them prior to the meeting at which it is to be presented. All voted in favor. MINNESOTA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a VARIANCE The public hearing for a variance and conditional use permit for a pylon sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, Yankee Doodle Road, west of. Pilot Knob Road, was then convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle then described the proposal and Mr. Mike Larkin appeared on behalf of the applicant. It was indicated that the bank now lacked visibility on Yankee Doodle Road, due to the development around it and that it was cooperating with the Amoco station adjacent to it in order to maximize the distance between pylon signs along Yankee Doodle Road, if a fourth pylon sign was to be allowed. It was then suggested that the applicant's request be considered together with the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move the existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition at the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. Mr. Runkle .pointed out that the Amoco Oil Company variance request was tied to two other variances for the expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station located on Lot L, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition, and apparently impacted the need to move the pylon sign for that location. APC Minutes May 27, 1986 The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station. Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive status in the area. Chairperson McCrea then ,convened the public hearing in regard to the Amoco Oil:Company request fora variance to move an existing pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public hearing was closed. Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed. Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and ® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the distance between signs would be asJollows: The distance between the Super America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be 275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet. 2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level. ® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant, being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping sign and the Amoco sign. 4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition, in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and the Amoco station. 3 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight VARIANCE TO MOVE PYLON SIGN/AMOCO OIL B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition --A public hearing was .held to consider a variance to move a pylon sign that currently advertises the Amoco Oil station on Yankee Doodle Road. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the variance, subject to conditions set forth in the Planning Department report. For a copy of the Planning Department report which pertains to this agenda item and agenda item C of new busi- ness, refer to pages through. For action that was take by the APC, ref r to a copy of those minutes found on • page(s) /Z j through /7_ (,, . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a variance to allow an existing pylon sign to be moved for .the Amoco Oil Company., • �� O CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR BLDG. SETBACK & VARIANCE FOR 20' GREEN AREA ALONG A PUBLIC ROAD & A VARIANCE TO MOVE A PYLON SIGN. APPLICANT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY, JIM RABUSE LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDN. EXISTING ZONING: NB (.UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT; DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ® APPLICATION: An apDl catian leas 's�sa su;-.:fitted requesting 3 Variances; 2 relating _o :yailCiag C�siSn anc 1Variance to relocate an existing pylon sign on Lo'- 1, Block 1: Bicz!ntennial 3rd Addition. COMMENTS: Mr. Rabuse has met with the Planning Department a number of times to see how he could provide additional service to his customers by remodeling his existing station to provide one-stop convenience shopping, along with gas, in order to compe`-e with other facilities in the general area. Mr. Rabuse has submitted a revised site plan which shows a remodeling or building addition to the east of which the building would go to approximately 3' at the east property line. The most easterly extension would be remodeled for the car wash. The location of the existing car wash would be converted for the convenience foods and in relocating the car wash facility, the traffic circulation would be reversed from what it presently is. Therefore, a widening of the driveway area on the north property line would be required to get adequate stacking and ® circulation. The traffic would then go from the north to the south through the car wash facility and out to access on 81st St. versus Washington Dr. Mr. Rabuse has contacted the adjacent property owners of which a letter is attached with their submittal stating they have no problem with the Variance encroachment on the east. If the Variance is approved for the building expansion, then the applicant is requesting to move the pylon sign which is presently located in the northeast corner of the lot further west or closer to the intersection of Washington Dr. and Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed is a rendering of the sign which the applicant would construct if the Variance is approved. The variance should be subject to the following conditions: 1) Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2) All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to . 3) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20' green area. /ZD April 28, 1986 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Subject: Variance Request - Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition (Yankee Square Standard) Dear Council Members: • If approved, it is the purpose of this variance to allow for the remodeling of the current existing structure to provide for ancillary sales and interior convenience to and for the motoring public. This request will enable Yankee Square Standard to re -position itself to better serve the increasing needs and wants of the customer and for the growth of the Eagan. community. The following variance or variances are respectfully requested: 1.) 0 -Zero Setback from the East property line to allow for the addition of a Car Wash bay and the re-routing of drive to allow for'ease of vehicle egress. 2.) 0 -Zero Setback from the North property line for the re-routing of drive to allow for ease of vehicle ingress. Respectfully, W. J. Rabuse Yankee Square Standard 1424 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 612/454-5522 �ww "e'-pluttm April 21, 1986 Mr. N.J. Rabuse Vice President Y.F. Inc. 1424 Yankee Doodle Road Eagan AIN 55121 Dear Jim, Minnesota National Bank of Eagan has no objection to a zero(0) variance from the East property line for your building expansion on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentenial Third Addition. Please keep me advised as to your progress on this matter. Yours truly, MI`NE80TA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN -17 M.E.Larkin President MII /lr 1-2,7- Minnesota 2%i Minnesota Nacional Hunk of Fagan 3900 Sihle% Memorial I liehYc:rc I:.I�d n. 1\11MUSOM 1512] (6I') -151-i'00 I I&A �i APC Minutes May 27, 1986 The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station. Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive status in the area. Chairperson' McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move an existing pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public hearing was closed. Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed. Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and ® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the distance between signs would be as follows: The distance between the Super America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be 275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the following conditions: . 1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet. 2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level. ® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant, being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping sign and the Amoco sign. 4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition, in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and the Amoco station. /y5 3 APC Minutes May 27, 1986 Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request. Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station Located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section L6, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: • 1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20 foot green area. . 4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent driveways. All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT • Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180 square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue. Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council. Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property. All voted in favor. / 4 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine /EXPANSION AND C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard') from Setback Requirements for Expansion and Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station ---A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a variance for a building setback and a 20 foot green area along Yankee Doodle Road for the expansion and remodeling of the Yankee Square Standard gas station. The APC is recommending approval of both variances as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report that was provided as a part of the aforementioned agenda item B of New Business. • For additional information on the action that was taken by .the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)�. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing Yankee Square gas station. APC Minutes May 27, 1986 Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request. Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two ® variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2. Ali other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20 foot green area. .. 4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent driveways. Ail voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. ® DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180 square feet per 'face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue. Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council. Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50.per square foot. 3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property. All voted in favor, 4 • Agenda Information Memo 'June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Thirty CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN FOR DALLAS DEVELOPMENT D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon Sign for an Office/Warehouse--A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on May 27, 1'986, to consider an application that was submitted by the Dallas Development Company for a .conditional use permit to allow a locational sign for their project. The APC is recom- mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy if enclosed on pages /3d through /:33 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of their minutes found on page(s) /9�/ . ACTION, TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit to allow a pylon sign for an office/warehouse as presented by the Dallas Development Corporation. iZ9 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LOCATION: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 1ST ADDN. SEa, SEC. 18 EXISTING ZONING: LI - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Dallas Development company requesting a Conditional Use permit to allow a locational sign for the recently approved Dallas Development 1st Addition. This 103,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse is now under full construction and is located west of Hwy. 13 and south of Silver Bell Road. COMMENTS: A Conditional Use Permit is required since the proposed monument style sign is over 7'. The sign will have an interior angle of 44" and both sides will be visible from Hwy. 13. The intent was to create a sign that would "mirror" the style of the building. This would be achieved by using similar materials and rounded corners. The base of the sign (3.5' tall) will be constructed of rock -faced concrete block and will contain a planting area. The actual signage area will measure 22' at • the base and form a half -circle. This area will be made of 6" horizontal cedar boards. The lettering will be interior lighted and 8" tall. The overall signage area will be approximately 180 sq.ft./side and the height at the top of the sign will reach 12.5'. The height is necessary since the sign is in a large parking island and must be visable above the parked cars. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1) This sign be the only monument sign over 7' on the site. 2) The one-time sign permit fee, of $2.50/sq.ft. of signage area. JS/jj l� l3l m ME PLAN DATA I" tAa W m ME PLAN D V n1101111=I�I�I��ISI �Yn! SWI®Iplwy���l �I�I�SMO awiem�nnn��unnn��®i�nn��s�nnnnam® sw®ne_i nnnn����nnn���i�m�eo • SIGN PLAN X33 APC Minutes May 21, 1986 Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request. Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and Wilkins voted against. YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 10 Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: 1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the remodeling. 2. Ail other City Ordinances shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of encroachment to the 20 foot green area. . 4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent driveways. Ali voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no. DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180 square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue. Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council. Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the following conditions: 1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property. All voted in favor. / 2 4 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EQUITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY MOTEC TRANSMISSION E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motet Transmission) for a Pylon Sign --A public healing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting heldon May 27, 1986, to consider a conditional use permit for a pylon sign in the Barton McGray Addition as submitted by Equity Construction/Motet Transmission. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign. For additional information on the item, refer to the Planning Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages through /3P . /gpe- mi�utea� p. In reviewing this application, i -t occurred to the City Administra- tor that a conditional use permit for a pylon sign had been applied for at .one time by Motec Transmission. That pylon sign was denied. Since a variance is more than likely required to the lineal footage distance between the Mediterranean Cruise sign and the Motec sign that is proposed for the 'T.H.13 frontage, additional information will be forthcoming with the Administrative packet to better explain the variance and history of the sign that was denied for Motec Transmission. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit for a pylon sign for Equity Construction Company/ Motec Transmission. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: MOTEC TRANSMISSION CLINICS LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: GB - GENERAL BUSINESS (NE;, SEC. 19) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM, PLANNER I ® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit t"o allow a pylon sign for Motec Transmission Clinics on Lot 4, Block 1, of the Barton McGray Addition. COMMENTS. All seven lots in this addition have frontage along Cedarview Drive, a service -road for Cedarvale Blvd. Lot 2 (Sherwin Williams Paint) and the Mediterranean Cruise :Restaurant, Lot 5, have pylon signs along this service road. They are approximately 400' apart. (See exhibit.) City Code requires 300 lineal ft. between pylon signs on the same side of the street and a maximum height of 27=. The proposed sign is 20' tall, two -directional, interior -lighted and has a signage area of 60 sq. ft. The applicant will locate this sign along the northwest property line that abutts MnDOT (Hwy. 13) right-of-way. The widest portion of the sign must be kept 10' within the property line. No other pylon sign is • being proposed along Cedarview Drive. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1) Sign placement as approved by the City Council. 2) The one-time sign fee of $2.,50/sq.ft. JS/jj 1�6 13� Ll • • N IG�x l�aYy ra. vwIr NIgw E city of Bogan Department of Planning i APC Minutes May 27, 1986 MOTEC TRANSMISSION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was poincea out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council. 2. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to be 300 feet from any adjacent signs. All voted in favor except Voracek who voted no. R. K. SCHEURENBRAND — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was present and explained the .proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other necessary licenses. 2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes shall be adhered to. 3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time. 4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the site without City Council approval. 5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor control. Ali voted in favor. 5 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/R. KAYE SCHEURENBRAND FOR BOARDING KENNEL F. Conditional Use Permit/R. Kaye Scheurenbrand for a Commercial Board Kennel --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the May 27, 1986, meeting to consider a conditional use permit.. application submitted by Kaye Scheurenbrand to allow a temporary animal grooming, and kennel facility on 5,.81 acres west of Highway 3. The Advisory Planning Commission is recom- mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented. For additional information, refer to the Planning Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages/through / 6 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)1!�Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for a commercial boarding kennel as applied for by Kaye Schuerenbrand. /,416 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: KAYE SCHEURENBRAND LOCATION: NE a, SECTION 36 EXISTING ZONING: A, AGRICULTURE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20., 1986 REPORTED BY: JIM STURM • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a temporary animal grooming and kennel facility on 5.81 acres west of Highway 3 in Section 36. COMMENTS: The Code requires that a license to operate and maintain a dog kennel be obtained from the City and that a Conditional Use Permit be requiredfor kennels on 5+ Agricultural parcels. The applicant intends to remodel an existing 3 -car garage into a boarding kennel that contains 10 2' x 4' or 5 4' x 4' upper/lower cages. In front of these cages are 2' x 10' exercise runs. The application is temporary since the applicant wishes to construct a permanent facility of approximately 4,000 sq. ft_ in the future that may serve as the City Animal Pound. The City Animal Warden has reviewed the submitted plan and it meets her approval. ® Several letters of recommendation have been included with the application and 2 have been attached for your review. Note. The applicant does not own theproperty at this time, but has an option to buy subject to. the approval of the Conditional Use Permit. If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1) The applicant obtaining a City Kennel License and all other necessary licenses. 2) A building permit be required for the remodeling and that all Codes be adhered to. 3) The maximum number of animals not exceed 10 at one time. 4) No future building expansion or future building on the site without City Council approval. 5) All animals be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor control. JS/jj /�(L 0 E 22.46 TiF -/�, • -- • - as -. Ll 2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811 June 1, 1983 City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_ It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and she has always been extremely cooperative. Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize any possible noise violation. I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset to your community as she has been to ours. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Robert A. Mood, Manager Building and Inspection Division cln AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER vl� my Of 000mington 2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811 June 1, 1983 City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_ It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and she has always been extremely cooperative. Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize any possible noise violation. I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset to your community as she has been to ours. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Robert A. Mood, Manager Building and Inspection Division cln AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER SOUTH HYLAND VETERINARY HOSPITAL JAMES A. LIBBY. D.V.M. BEVERLY MAINS. O.V.M. _ 5600 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55437 ■61-1!6• October 1, 1984 City Council Bloomington, Mn I am writing on behalf of Kaye Scheurenbrand and am pleased to recommend your approval of her proposed grooming and boarding facility. I have known Kaye for over 14 years and have a high regard for her ability to operate a clean, sanitary, and professional facility. This should be a nice asset to our community. inz rely, mes A. Libby D. .M. • APC Minutes May 27, 1986 MOTEC TRANSMISSION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was pointed out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: ® 1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council. 2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot. 3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to be 300 feet from any adjacent signs. Ail voted in favor except Voracek who voted no. R. K. SCHEURENBRAND - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was present and explained the proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other necessary licenses. 2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes shall be adhered to. 3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time. 4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the site without City Council approval. 5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor control. Ali voted in favor. 147 5 • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three WAIVER OF PLAT/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life/Opus Corporation) to Split Lot 18 and Combine N% of Lots 19 & 20, Creating a New Four -Acre Parcel Located N of Lone Oak Road and W of Service Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on May 27, 1986, to consider a waiver of plat applica- tion to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new four -acre lot in the Eagandale Industrial Park #1. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the application. For additional information on the item, refer to the Planning and Engineering report which is enclosed on pagesl�,f through /5y. For action that was taken by the APC, refer td —those minutes found on page(;s) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat application as presented by the Opus Corporation/ Northwestern Mutual Life. I f�� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE LOCATION: LOTS 18-20, BLOCK 5, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PK..# SEa, SECTION 3 EXISTING ZONING: L1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 28, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING ® APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new 4 ac lot in the Eagandale Industrial Park #1. This lot is north of Lone Oak Road and has approximately 325' of frontage on West Service Road. Champion International will abut this site to the NE. Northwestern Warehouse and a 45' railroad easement form the rear property line. As a result of this Waiver, Lot 17 will be increased to a more .developable 3 -acre lot. The newly formed lot will contain a one-story brick office/warehouse built for National Business Systems. The submitted site plan meets Code setback, lot coverage and parking requirements. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to: ® 1) A $.02/ft. Parks Dedication Fee. 2) A detailed landscape plan approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3) All other Code requirements. JS/jj #q 166 Ll 0 yC vVTC 43 EAGANDALE BUSINESSB.K. 1 l•. CAMPUS OS �. McKEE EAGANOALE CJOFFICEG :ENTER "p.. pO s 3 GaG�? . FIRS?� T plLf R •NEW 0O LOTI BLKI HOLLAND Y",.. -Ir 21 DIVISION OF 15 SPERRV 14 17 ,' ovsnEw RANDS SIEVE H - $ BUSINESS • �P 17 cEME D moN AMERICAN 45�J5� \02 10 FRUIT & 3� R p PRODUCE 1'r ati�02P race.w. SH �P OUTLOT n..c 14 u.c •y\ :� •A� F P ns.c aF 19 ...c 15 ' 19 •l6i �b OUTLOT 6 6 ..;x 7.:.. 1B Sr .c A .AL .26 ..� 16 $ OU®LOTS K .r 17 10. SS7� " 16 sor OUTL T3 OUTLOT4 ..r 5 19 6 u]¢ ... 911 .or 6 1 E.0 es uu o .c au K • LEMAY UNPLATD UNPLATTED LAKE a]I K APARTMENTS BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR: NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. K EAG .N1?AI_E,CE: 'TER INi!Uoc\T / /'/\\ UCT. 19 / \ YS \ lOT IB N RIIAL SARK '-,_//i I. I.r..... =jw. 11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic. il i "'i 11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic. APC Minutes May 27, 1986 NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION WAIVER OF PLAT Chairperson McCrea next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eaganaale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section '3, north of Lone Oak Road on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions: ® 1. There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication fee. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with. 4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the Engineering report. All voted in favor. BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway #55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St. Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from PD to R-1. All voted yea. /'�3 I Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four REZONING FROM PD TO R-1/BUR OAK HILLS H. Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD to R-1 for Approximately 111 Acres --An application was submitted by the Harsted Companies to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development from a PD to R-1 District. This application is a result of a require- ment by the City Council when the preliminary plat was acted on at the April 15, 1986, meeting. The APC is recommending approval of the rezoning. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report; a copy is enclosed on pages through /(e45 For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page (s) //o/P • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from PD to R-1 for the Bur Oak Hills development. /5�z .CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES LOCATION: Sz, SECTION 12 EXISTING ZONING: P.D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Harstad Companies to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development (PD 74-5) to a R-1 (Single Family) district. The Preliminary Plat consisting of 205 lots on 111 acres was approved subject to this rezoning on April 15, 1986. The developer is in the process of completing final plat require- ments. JS/jj • J6el A -- CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES (BUR OAKS) LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY: NE;, SE4, SA, SECTION 12 PD (SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS) JANUARY 28, 1986 JANUARY 23, 1986 PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUBMITTED • An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for 204 single family lots in the South Delaware Hills Planned Development in Section 12. ZONING & LAND USE This 111 acre site abuts Inver Grove Heights to the east, highway 149 to the west, agricultural parcels and Bur Oaks Park to the north with more PD land to the south. A preliminary plat for this site was approved on September 18, 1979. All of the lots are above the 12,000 s.f. minimum for an R-1 (single family) classification and meet the 85' width at the setback line. BACKGROUND/COMMENTS There has been an issue as to whether this PD agreement is still • valid. The City Attorney's office has verified that it is and any deviation from the approved planned development preliminary plat of 1979 will require another public. hearing. Therefore, this plat will also require a rezoning to R-1 (single family). The submitted preliminary plat shows extensive grading in areas that were dedicated parkland in the previously approved plat. As a result, the densly wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be graded substantially. The Parks and Recreation .Dept has briefly reviewed this site and is opposed to it for, several reasons: 1) The wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be destroyed by the proposed grading. 2) The area that includes the tennis courts has 3.1 slopes along the western property line where typically 5.1.is needed for practical use/maintenance. 3) The access into the park is only one.lot wide fronting Rolling Hills Dr where the recommendations by the Parks Staff and Consultant was for a four lot area. - /55 - BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1985 PAGE 2 The Parks & Recreation Dept does not feel that there is suitable reason to waiver from the previously submitted parkland dedication requirements. GRADING The grading proposed by the applicant is feasible from an engineer- ing standpoint. That is, it meets all City criteria for slopes and grades with the exception of maintaining a 2% grade at inter- sections. There are several intersections where this 20 grade is exceeded. However, the applicant can revise the grading plan to provide for the required 2% slopes for 100' at the intersections. Because of the rugged topography, -there -are several areas on ® the applicant's grading plan showing 2:1 slopes. While these slopes are within City Codes, they are very difficult to maintain once permanent vegetation is established. Until that time, these slopes are extremely susceptible to erosion. As a result, the staff will recommend a detailed proposal from this applicant as to how he proposes to control erosion on this site. Also, staff recommends the applicant revise the grading plan at intersec- tions where he does not achieve a 20 slope for 100' past the intersection. Finally, because the applicant proposes to encroach on Williams Brothers Pipeline easement for grading his site, staff recommends the applicant obtain written authorization from Williams Brothers Pipeline allowing them to perform the necessary grading operations within Williams Brothers easement. DRAINAGE The proposed grading in this site will not change any of the existing drainage patterns. This site is located within major drainage district G as shown on Figure 1. All of this site eventually ends up into Pond GP -1 (Burr Oak Pond).. A positive outlet is in place for this pond which outlets to downstream ponds that all have positive outlets to the Minnesota River valley. This development will be responsible for providing the necessary ponding area for GP -1 and also for the portion of Pond GP -8, located within this development. This development will require the extension of trunk storm sewer between Pond GP -8 and Pond GP -1. It also will require the extension of trunk storm sewer from GP -1 southerly to its southern boundary. If the applicant chooses to have this work performed under City contract, then the City Council must authorize such a project prior to final plat approval. If the developer chooses to install City trunk storm sewer privately, then it will be at his own expense because the City has no provisions to provide credits . for work performed privately._ I5G 1 _BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 3 SANITARY SEWER This proposed development is located within sanitary sewer subdis- trict N -EE, as shown on Figure 2. The master plan proposes extending a 12" sanitary sewer southerly through this development to pick up the southerly most portion of subdistrict N -EE. However, the U.P.S. Addition (about 40 acres in the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 13) was diverted from sub- district N -EE to subdistrict N -AA. Because of this, staff re- evaluated the necessity of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line. Staff's findings indicate that an 8" diameter sanitary sewer line would be adequate to provide service to subdistrict N -EE, thereby eliminating the necessity of any- trunk sanitary sewer within this area. This development will be responsible for extending sanitary sewer to their eastern boundary at appropriate locations to provide service to the area of this subdistrict located within Inver Grove Heights. It also will be required to extend sanitary sewer to its south boundary at an appropriate location and also to the parcel just easterly of the panhandle adjacent Highway 55. WATER MAIN This development will be responsible for extending an 8" water main from Highway 149 through this development to loop into the water main within Chapel Lane. It also will be responsible to stub water lines to its easterly and southerly boundaries where appropriate. STREETS Trunk Highway 149 borders the westerly portion of this development. 77th Street abuts the easterly edge of this development. Trunk Highway 149 is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department of Transportation and is a rural two-lane highway. 77th Street West is a rural roadway section under the jurisdiction. of Inver Grove Heights. With the exception of the two "bubbles" and the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac, staff agrees with the applicant's street plans. Staff recommends not approving the bubbles -for the following reasons: 1. There is no access hardship. The applicant is merely trying to obtain additional lots by using these bubbles. 2. The bubbles create a maintenance hardship and obstacle. 151 BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 4 3. The large paved areas within as children tend to play in close to the through streets. the bubbles create safety hazards them and they are located too 4. Council has experienced problems in the past with developers using the bubble only to obtain the necessary lot width and requesting vacation of excess easement after the fact. 5. The bubble on lot 11 should be eliminated and accessed up to the north for a future potential loop street through this parcel. This will eventually connect to the Rolling Hills Drive located within the panhandle. Staff feels that the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac should be eliminated because the only service it provides additional lot or two. Lis for an ot 1, Block 5 appears to be rather small for a corner lot anyway. The applicant will be responsible for constructing the temporary turn around shown in Inver Grove Heights. Also, the applicant will be responsible for the costs of connecting 77th Street West in Inver Grove Heights to their proposed 77th Street West. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant shall dedicate 60right-of-ways for all streets with 120' diameter cul-de-sacs. The developer shall also be responsible for dedicat- ing the southerly half of Rolling Hills Drive not shown on the preliminary plat. This development shall dedicate a 30' utility easement over ® all water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer not located within city right-of-way. This development will also be responsible for obtaining easements through the park property,' if required by the Park Department, for utilities. PERMITS This development will be responsible for permits: obtaining the necessary 1) MPGA sewer extension. 2) Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension. 3) MN Dot Access Permit. Because this development will generate more than 50,000 gallons per day of wastewater, the MPCA will require the preparation of an EA4P. This EAW preparation will be the responsibility of this developer. Staff recommends that no be granted until the City receives all permits. final plat approval BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 5 ASSESSMENTS In researching the City's assessment records, Staff has found that this development is still responsible for trunk area water main assessments, upgrading of trunk storm sewer area assessments because of large lot credit, and trunk area storm sewer assessments as indicated in the following summary table and as shown on Figure 3. (1) Includes 20o credit for streets (2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid) The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting attherates in effect at that time. CONDITIONS: 1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their easement. 3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8 to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions. 4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide for future extensions for later developments. /f�� ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd 1986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Area Water 70 Ac $1,190/Ac $83,300 Main (010-54, 011-04,010-79, 010-75,010-76,013-80) Trunk Area Storm Sewer 165,530 (1) 0.05/S.F. 8,276 (013-80) Trunk Area Storm Sewer 4.2 Ac $1,353/Ac (2) 5,683 Upgrade (011-04) - Total $97,259 (1) Includes 20o credit for streets (2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid) The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting attherates in effect at that time. CONDITIONS: 1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must be approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their easement. 3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8 to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions. 4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide for future extensions for later developments. /f�� BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT JANUARY 28, 1986 PAGE 6 5) This development shall insure that through this plat from T.H. 149 within Chapel Ln. Extensions of and south boundaries will also be extensions. an 8" watermain is looped to the existing watermain water lateral to the east required for future service 6) The final plat shall be revised to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac (Rolling Hills Circle) in the SE corner, the half cul-de-sac (Hillside Dr "bubb-le") in the SW corner & the half cul-de-sac (Hillcrest Dr bubble") in the NE corner shall be eliminated and replaced by a "stub" street for future extension to the unplatted parcel south of T.H. 55. This development shall be responsible for all costs associated with connecting 77th St west to the existing street in Inver Grove Heights. 7) The final plat shall provide for a permanent cul-de-sac in 160 the extreme northerly extension of Rolling Hills Dr with • platted right-of-way for a future westerly extension & ultimate connection to Chapel Ln. 8) All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 30' easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part of the final plat. 9) All permits required by local, County, Regional & State Agencies shall be acquired prior to final plat approval. 10) This development shall be responsible for all the additional assessments required with this- proposal as determined by the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. • 11) If public improvements are to be installed under City contract, the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 160 HAIIGE, EIDE & F ELLER, P. A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW PAUL M. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER Mr. Dale Runkle Eagan City Planner 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS 3906 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122 January 16, 1986 Re: South Delaware Hills Planned Development Dear Dale: AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 4544224 You have asked me to clarify the developer's rights under the South Delaware Hills Planned Development Agreement in regard to a preliminary plat being proposed which is different from the preliminary plat approved September 18, 1979. A Planned Development zone is not the equivalent of other zoning classifications with specific code criteria for land use, density, setbacks, parks, etc., other than as provided in the Planned Development Contract with its various exhibits. Under Eagan City Code, a Planned Development designation is a superimposed zoning designation (Section 11.20, Subd. 8) which requires the developer to provide specific information to allow a planned development which will better adapt itself to the physical and aesthetic settings of surrounding land than does existing zoning and yet be feasible for the owner and developer economically while benefiting the community at large to a greater degree than development of underlying zoning. Our files indicate that the Council has determined that the Planned Development Agreement commenced September 18, 1979, the same date as the approval of the preliminary plat for South Delaware Hills. The Planned Development Agreement in our filesappears to contain an exhibit in conformance with that proposed plat. Therefore, it is our opinion that any substantial deviation from the planned development agreement and the preliminary plat exhibit attached thereto would require Council approval and trigger the public hearing process with the required mailed notices to adjacent land owners. Substantial alterations would include changes in land use, parks and extensive grading. DGK:ras cc: Thomas Hedges Very truly yours, HAUGE, EIDE 6 KELLER, P.A. David G. Keller C E C J 0 0 a 3 r- i .. 1 ✓mil +\�\\�v`����J 1 � j�� ',ll ,4 Lc•y . I� T_!� ! 'fr(_ �l�'/ 1 11�� '�. 11 ' ; ��� �.`` i�-.�5.�?�� ' � 4i•. � � lI �y� r �`T�J[ I K I �1.' I ��'�q � � � `F 4-� a - I •� �—I y d �• •�. ♦ n 1 i' 7//��/ �.,!� /%� . ` d �\ a, -.y1 \\\ OWIFA 177 B OAK UR HILLS 40EYELOPQI • v t\ a -n y 111 ��• �, '� • > .-\ r, � , IIU ''�"��: ik �I E- ,:e+ 7 •n u.,a ti I PRELIMINARY PLAT � •L � \\\1�1 �.` �j/ /^w[ [[-i s " .` „� e"`��n` � /,,q,.- �1 <,�,.T',s\ .(1:.-'. �.`:...:w [.•.. ti �- \ a 11 -. I � - /� / -moi � • ,c . ,\, � D �' � I F' � •r�\ �= I \ 1i> 1 � 1,, ',1., •II y `�' a q Ij 1 :` .... ..r+': \I``\'f. \' •, - �,,�� .1 'r/4[[;a<�' �JJ1�/�]11111 iX1 �!�FF''\ P\ .�.• _�j r' , i; r• �J1, 1 ,/ ` ,. � 1 �-.•" 1 o.rrs r...r.�- _ r \\/� t 1 "� �' � //" / �L -�- ' .1 � \ � .'.� lyd ,: / 1 i.. z� � �! [ i I--=1' 'I_ I1 �.�-e•.' v..��.�...... �� \ '\ [ I �'1 '� •'R4R,[ Aon ' //) -i a ."} " �— i o - J• '. .1 a, � , -. • C i - / � qr 1 \ � � i14,(I y e I ; I,w, j1�- � �.¢ / • _ \� �" �\� � If CI..[ i .[ :[tay'[ ��•I `J I l ��III111 '�"C ? j<(il �`9 _�.°.r" ..�.) [G�✓ �,.. VA v --.---__—__-- y-- �� IL`;1�7•'�"_ e--'j-'��sF r 1' 71i f I r ' 1�� ' �J 4..1 i , p`\`f� ��} -1 _� ___ C _ n '..so i i-�,`a•�tA. � �� .t ^ \.•� t � r/. `u( �:�/<� \r:) i ��. i� '^f' 01r- • 1 • City of eagan r PUBLIC $ 117 WORKS DEPARTME 829.0 856,0 f �I � r\ V 77 0 B B0. \` 880 885.5 FP -9 8912 8870 890.0 P-8 I I 77.3 166.0 I IIS 'll ................ .... ............ .......... .. .... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN FIG. #1 approved: standard plate 4;.: CFNTER� _�X_zl -CNE JK RCC J I i -- -N-P Ir`Is I\ 85 _I CE\TER IS I 18 Vr— ty \ N-0, I ORARY M fi 5 �\ N. - C C.,, l\ a� rc a15 99 18 ..i \' \\ � N - J J II IA*** 15.,:, i N -EE WESCOTr c5E I i I I N -Z GARDEN LOTS I \\I\ 12 N -X 95 �\ _ l� �sN W I 13 \1 sski29„ N - city of eagan PUBLIC $ I - WORKS DEPARTF M ` SUBJECT PARCEL SANITARY SEWER MASTER PLAN AA • FIG. #2 approved: standard Plate #p: APC Minutes May 27, 1986 MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION WAIVER OF PLAT Chairperson McCrea next convened the public, hearing in regard to the application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20, creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 3, north of Lone Oak Road on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the following conditions: • 1. There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication fee. 2. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with. 4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the Engineering report. All voted in favor. BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway #55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St. Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from PD to R-1. All voted yea. * i Agenda Information Memo June 17, 198'6., City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five VARIANCE/RUSCON HOMES I. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Side Yard Setback Requirement for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition --An application was submitted by Ruscon Homes for a side yard variance of approxi- mately 2'' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the Park Ridge Addition. For additional information on this item refer to the Planning Depart- ment report, copies enclosed on page //e?. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance as presented by Ruscon Homes. • 14, CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: RUSCON HOMES LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 4, PARK RIDGE ADDN. EXISTING ZONING: R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ®APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a side yard variance of approximately 2' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the Par', Ridge Addition. This is an existing house that fronts on [gest End Trail. The original survey and building location met all City setback requirements and the building permit was issued on 8-23-83. In mid-April 1986, the lot to the south was surveyed in order to locate a fence. That is when the setbac:< error was discovered. Apparently, the field stakes we•eshifted by one of the contractors. The variance is requested to avoid any potential legal problems. The distance between both homes is in excess of 21'. If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable ordinances. 0 40 4y 'q I� ➢ I „ I��I'I r a�5 ii ei' 0.• i)ofl nz677uz w (07.00 — EXISTING 7 W H � I O VI W I � � siL.T-[... � X57•-.r-C.••ty � Z h�w� Z ----------- rase I� J I IiaN,•. � < c 0 K TA.S. 9 TAM1 Z 1b.zo °5zo' �s' / 'e� aa�'� i—�..—-----� J� Cd -o, e•zz �5• � -�- _ y p:493. ct•5I IVE. �T o— _ �. _ W inl7 �' e Agenda Information Memo June 17, 19186, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six SPECIAL PERMIT/GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT FOR MODEL HOME J. Special Permit (Overbill Replat Grand Oaks Development) to allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval --An application was submitted for a special permit Grand Oaks Development request- ing a Model Home prior to final plat approval. For additional information on this item refer to the Planning Department. report and a letter from the developer requesting the Model Home permit • as referenced on pages / j) through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the special permit application as requested by Grand Oaks Development. 167 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT APPLICANT: GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a special permit to allow a building permit for a model home prior to final plat approval. The applicant desires this special permit due to the upcoming "Parade of Homes" and the heavy final plat workload on City staff. Attached is a letter explaining this hardship request in greater detail. The proposed home is a split entry and is 54' wide. No setback variances will be required. If approved the special permit shall be subject to the following: ® 1) This lot not receiving any setback variances 2) This model home not be sold for home occupancy until all public utilities are connected. 3) This model home be the only model in this addition. /,O -"AKE FOI NTE v i • •R .0 i I � = vva I:Yu�� 6 g� 7 B�j 8' 9 g•n LL�10 ��tr Iyi'' ff.e :e Sy Ra 9b =:•�':�Y n%! r .e.FJ '° • ` L it ze 16 I . ^ S � _ S+. 7 • a 15 B la 6.a 13 = 6• d. Jtl' •ate-. .8 -i _ to - 9 a.n u17d 3 9 5 6.'Rr .7 R•a R'6 _18. Id .- it C - A ac la l�.an . tee.,•,. 0,4 m e�>< :± ~- : na as \ a3 law rw ter..; \ a 5, t bo • Via. - 'am.:^i.;' >n--�. _.r. _' _ _ i aA __..v w._ o,• ,,,,a - .'.��•a.ia.O. a \ .o , %'. 3m ='^ 8 n 5 — __ _ ate.• '�'t •�+. •8 a6 b .. C—ORGINAGE \I ( B UTILITY ISI EASEMENT PER PLAT, - 5 LOT 2 U • .I 03 I r�, I (947!) 500 CCtl III PRO/SED 0 Q o I "./ MOUSE 19.0/// N -J 8(D 2e.O I. e clj d' I o(947. I N GA/0) F. ry I I !n 26.0 (9 7 IIII 4 a) o> IoO SQA ;t1.N;' I —J e 12.96 .� I 0 19u .D) 3T6'4 "E` 79.30 - R=1884.29 D 4=2°24'41" l9 I,l HAY LAKE ROAD - June 12, 1986 . TO: Members of the Eagan Council RE: Lot 2, Block 4 Overhill Replat Model Permit Due to the extremely heavy back log of final plat proposals is submitted for spots on your agenda, we find ourselves in a very precarious position. The Minneapolis and St. Paul "Parade of Homes" (the largest builder promotion of the year) will be held September 7-22, 1986. Over 50% of our business for the following 12 months comes from that Parade. We respectfully request you grant a Model permit for our "Parade of Homes" model. This will allow us to continue business and represent the Eagan area with quality exhibits in the 1986-87 home market. Your cooperation and understanding in this matter will be greatly appreciated. Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Thank you. ® Michael A. Parish President re s i den/�t/,/7�, - "\ `' Mare Montgomery Vice -President 1881 Sunrise Court ECocn, MM 55122 (612) 452-0747 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Seven GENERAL LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE K_ 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance Renewal --The City's General Liability and Workers Compensation .Insurance expires on June 30, 1986. As previously stated, the Home Insurance Company who is the present carrier of the City's insurance, is no longer issuing municipal insurance coverage. Therefore the City's insurance agent, Mr. Bruce Medvec of Valley View Insurance, has researched other carriers and apparently the • League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Plan is the best possible one of only two alternatives available to the City. The Finance Committee, at the direction of the City Council, met at noon on May 29 to discuss the City's insurance program with the Director of Finance and City Administrator. At that meeting, Mr. Medvec indicated that the quotes from the League of Minnesota Cities should be available on approximately June 13 for review and consideration on the June 17 meeting. The City has received the self-insured workers com ensation quotation which is enclosed on pages /7/- through for your review. Also attached is a copy of a League of Minnesota Cities memo that discusses the self-insured workers compensation program that was attached to the quotation offering. Mr. Medvec has been assured that the general liability and additional workers information will be available Friday afternoon; however, the quotations will take time to review, therefore, final quotes for both the workers compensation and general liability will be sent out with the administrative packet on Monday. Mr. Medvec will be present at the meeting on Tuesday for review and answering 40 questions. The memo that was submitted as a part of the last City Council packet outlining the Finance Committee's meeting is again enclosed on pages -L7-7- through -4ZE for your reference. In the most recent Nation's Cities Weekly dated June 2, 1986, an article appeared on insurance and apparently legislation is being considered under the Risk Retention Act Amendments of 1986 that would allow local units of government to establish risk retention groups and to purchase liability insurance on a group basis. Enclosed on page /1'9 is a copy of this article for your review. This article is inf—or�Tational only. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a general liability and workers compensation program for 1986/1987 to be effective July 1, 1986. /%3 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST Self -Insured Workers' Compensation Quotation Plan Administrators: Employee Benefit Administration Co. 6950 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 401 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Telephone (612) 544-0311 Name of City: Policy Period: From July 1. 1986 To July 1. 1987 Estimated Annual Premium: Street and Road Construction ®Waterworks Electric Power Co. & Steam Heating Sewage Plant Firemen (Not Volunteer) Firemen (Volunteer) Policemen Store Risks Retail Clerical Office Building Operations Restaurants and Bars Pa rks Street B, Sewer Cleaning, Snow Removal Municipal Employees 0 Code 5506 7520 7539 7580 7706 7708 7720 8017 8810 9015 9079 9102 9402 9410 1986 Estimate Manual Experience Modification Factor Standard Premium Premium Discount Discounted Standard Premium LMCIT Discount 5 % Net Deposit Premium Rate $9.35 6.68 4.36 4.68 12.93 31.53 5.63 1.60 .24 6.34 2.89 5.60 11.78 2.53 Estimated Payroll 228.000 134.000 Deposit Premium 30,456 POP* 9,603 961,000 54,104 641,000 24,000 266,000 34,000 592,000 1,538 1,522 14,896 4.005 14,978 130,915. .79 103,422. 9,432. 93,990. 4.700. .O The foregoing quotation is fora deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. Your final, actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your policy year and will be subject to revisions in rate or experience modification. While you are a member of the LMCIT Workers' Compensation Plan, you will be eligible to participate in distributions from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings of the Trust. /7el EBA 441 Employee Benef-KAdministrat;on Co. ent s l` IIII llll 11 HilU league of minnesota cities LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST SELF-INSURED WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM The League of Minnesota Cities' workers' compensation program was created as a means of lowering cities' workers' compensation costs. The program is a joint self-insured program, and is offered through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), a joint powers entity. This self-insured program was designed for the League by Employee Benefit Administration Co. The prograin completed its sixth year of operation with over 500 participating cities, representing a standard premium volume of over $8.0 million. The following table shows the program's past results. Initial Discount Year -End Dividend Total Savings 1980 6p 25' 31`% 1981 15P 25% 40% 1982 18p 20% 38n 1933 18% 16% 34�a The discount was 20% in 1984 and 10' in 1985; no dividends were returned for these years. For 1986, the discount is 5`p. HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS Each city participating in the program deposits with the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust its workers' compensation deposit premium for its policy year. This deposit premium is calculated using standard manual rates with the applicable volume discounts and experience modification, and discounting 5p from this figure. From these deposits, LMCIT purchases reinsurance to protect the program from catastrophic and abnormal claims; pays for administrative and loss control services; and pays claims. The balance of the deposits and reserves are invested, with the earnings accruing to the benefit of the participants. After the close of the program year, surplus monies in excess of appropriate reserves are returned to participants under a formula taking into account the earnings and claims experience of the Trust, as well as the loss records of individual participants. ELIGIBILITY All members of the League of Minnesota Cities are eligible to participate. However, LMCIT may require a city with a poor loss recoru to comply with specified safety practices as a condition of participation. 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600 LJ ADI•iINISTRATION LIMCIT nas appointed Employee Benefit Administration Co. (E.B.A.) as administrator of the program. E.B.A. also administers a similar pian for the Minnesota School Boards Association and offers a fully qualified staff in all areas of workers' compensation administration. The cost of administration of the program is 101. of standard premium. Services provided by the administrator include: 1. Determination of premium for participants. 2. On-site safety inspections and development of loss control program. 3. Claims processing, investigation and payment. 4. Legal counsel for disputed claims up to the Appeals Court trial. 5. Loss reports to individual participants and to LICIT. 6. Preparation of reports required by state autnorities. REINSURANCE To protect LMCIT from the adverse effects of catastrop!ric and abnormal claims, LMCIT purchases reinsurance from two sources. The state 'Workers' Compensation Reinsurance Association provides individual excess coverage. This covers workers' compensation claims arising out of any single occurrence which exceed $360,000. LMCIT also purchases aggregate excess coverage to protect against the possibility that the total claims will exceed the funds available. ADVANTAGES OF THE PROGRAM 1. Lower operating costs. Conventional insurance carriers typically allow between 30% and 40% of the premium dollar for administrative costs. Tne total cost to LMCIT for administration, reinsurance, and commissions is well under 20%. ® 2. Investment Income. Earnings on investments accrue to the benefit of participants. Due to the long-term nature of certain workers' compensation claims, substantial reserves are built up in the program. These reserves, along with premium deposits, are invested; the investment income further„_reduces the program costs. 3. Loss Control. A specialized approach to loss control provides practical assistance in reducing losses. 4. [ion -profit. Since the LMCIT program is non-profit, all excess funds are available for distribution to participants. PARTICIPATIOL This program is offered to cities through independent agents. For further infomation, contact: Employee Benefit Administration Co. League of Minnesota Cities 6950Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430 or 153 University Ave. E. Minneapolis, M!'7 55426 St. Paul, fain. 55101 Phone: (612) 544-0311 Phone: (612) 227-5600 f 76 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 2, 1986 SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING FOR PURPOSE OF REVIEWING CITY INSURANCE PROGRAM A meeting of the Finance Committee was held at noon on May 29, 1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building. Present were its Chairperson, City Councilmember Smith, City Councilmember Egan, Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Intern Johannes and the City Administrator. Also present was Bruce Medvec, the City's insurance agent. Mr. Medvec informed the Committee that Eagan has enjoyed to date the equivalent of a full insurance coverage package for general liability and worker's compensation. He reminded the Finance Committee that the City has $1,000,000 of basic liability insurance and a $2,000,000 umbrella providing a total coverage of $3,000,000. Fortunately, the cost for a total coverage of $3,000,000 has been extremely reasonable to the City in comparison to projection for an equivalent package in the future. Bruce .spoke to the new market that has developed in recent months stating that afford- ability and availability are significant problems for municipal insurance renewals. It is the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the City not continue with an umbrella coverage due to the high premium cost. For the City to be insured greater than the $600,000 statutory amount, the cost for a premium would be in the range of $80,000-$10'0,000 for $1,000,000 of additional umbrella coverage. This past year, $2,000,000 of umbrella coverage cost the City approximately $40,000. It was also the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the City raise its deductibles under the general liability portion of the insurance package in an effort to target a savings of approximately $20,000. It was the opinion of Bruce and the Finance Committee that the City should budget any savings it might realize by raising the deductibles therefore creating a special fund for the smaller claims. Because of self-insuring and cities assuming more risk, it is Bruce's opinion that our City may not experience any premium increase over the 1985-1986 amounts. Mr. Medvec has submitted a specification to the League of Minnesota Cities and is hopeful that a quote will be returned prior to June 13 for review and consideration at the June 17 meeting. The LMC insurance package is about the only coverage available to municipalities at this time. There is another insurance company that provides municipal insurance; however, it is provided on an actual claim basis as opposed to an occurence basis --the latter being more consistent with Eagan's past practice. The Finance Committee also discussed the necessity for increasing the City of Eagan's awareness and activity in a more formalized 17, risk management program. Mr. Medvec indicated that as the City's insurance agent, a part of his service is to provide risk manage- ment analysis for all departments. There were a number of topics discussed such as: * Coverage of Firefighters * Safety Belt Law * Safety Committee * Police SWAT Team * Engineering Design * Employee Awareness The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:00 is the intention of the Finance Committee to meet as a committee or by a teleconference call prior is 17 City Council meeting for the purpose of examining that is submitted by the League of Minnesota Cities. and information will be provided as a part of the packet with the June 17 agenda information. Cit Administrator TLH/kf • /70 p.m. and it again either to the June the quotation More detail City Council Nation's Cities Weekly June 2, 1986 i request to cities as, well at approximately the end of June. -- z .There has been some discussion in the Senate of a proposal to include within the 1987 budget instructions ,or reconc lia- tion legislation a provision requiring the mandatory participation of all state and local employees in the Medicare system. Preliminary estimates of requiring all state and local employees to participate in Medicare indicate a total fiscal impact to state and local governments of $8.3 billion over three years under such a plan. NLC strongly opposes any such pro- posal. LIABILITY INSURANCE 5.2129, the Risk Retention Act Amendments of 1986 remains mired as efforts continue to proceed to the Senate floor for full Senate consideration. Spon- sored by Sen. Bob Kasten (R-Wisc.), this legislation, strongly supported by NLC, _ would facilitate the ability of state and local units of government to establish risk retention groups and to purchase liability insurance on a group basis. NLC recently sent a letter to 19 of the top insurance executives in the country urging them to work more closely with NLC in expediting Senate consideration of this legislation. Industry opposition to the legislation has intensified as a num- ber of amendments have been offered Which would significantly impair the ability of groups to form and operate under the Act. _ House risk retention bills— H.R.4301—Rep. Ron Wyden (D -Ore.); H.R. 4442—Rep. Norman Lent (R-N.Y.); and H.R. 4506—Rep. John LaFalce (D- N.Y.) are bottled up in the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Com- merce, Transportation, and Tourism un- der Chairman James Florio (D-N.J.). Ef- forts continue to expedite subcommittee, full committee, and full House consider- ation. Insurance reform legislation offered by Rep. John LaFalce (D-N.Y.) awaits com- mittee consideration. Sen. Paul Simon (D -Ill.) is expected to offer similar Senate legislation in the near future. ❑ This report was compiled by NLC's Office of Federal Relations under the direction of its director, Frank Shafroth, and assisted by ,staff, members Carol Kocheisen, Reggie Todd, Cynthia Pols, Victor A. Rojas and Leslie A. Wollack. , • Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Eight KEEPING OF HORSES/FRED DELOSH A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses on Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh--Mr. Fred DeLosh has resided at 2'8'82 Sibley Highway since 1946., For a number of years he was allowed to keep and board horses on his property. His property was zoned agricultural; however, in recent years was rezoned from A-1 to R-1 by the City. Since Mr. DeLosh has not boarded horses in recent years, the property is :now zoned R-1, he is questioning whether he can have some type of permit that would allow him to market and sell the property with the usable stable and approval to board horses on his 14 acres. Enclosed on pages jf/ through /S13 is a copy of a letter from Mr. DeLosh and aerial photo that shows the outline of his property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide some direction to the City staff and Mr. DeLosh concerning his request. 2882 Sibley Hwy. Eagan Mn. 55121 May 27, 1986 Mr. Dale Runkle �— City Planner Eagan, Mn. Dear Mr. Runkle, Our family has owned and resided on our 14 acres off Hwy. 13 in north Eagan since 1946. The acreage was zoned agri- cultural but, in one of our occupational absences out of state, was rezoned R=1 without our knowledge. We have never attempted to return it to agricultural status. • We had horses for many years and built a stable to house them. This stable has been kept in good shape and is very use- able. The purpose of this letter is to ascertain that horses can again be kept on *he property even though it is zoned R-1 at present. This determination is especially important to our children, as heirs, and to us in the event that we sell said property, Here are some pertinent bits of information -- The stable is located out of sight in the bottom of a deep ravine. The ravine is heavily wooded and has a small spring fed creek flowing through it. ® The adjoining area Is sparsely settled with Highview Park on the east boundary of the property. I believe that approximately two thirds of affected adjoining property owners resided there when we kept horses. I am enclosing an aerial photo of the area and a topographic map to assist you and the council in its deliberations. Please return them to me._ A prompt decision would be deeply appreciated. Very t my yours, Fred De Losh /q/ PA Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Nine RESOLUTION/AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE B. Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee - At a recent meeting of the Airport Noise Committee a resolution was adopted opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at Minneapolis. - St. Paul International Airport. The Commission is recommending that the City Council approve the resolution referenced on pages _/f5 through /QZ:. . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the resolution opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at the Minneapolis - St. Paul International Airport. r, CITY OF EAGAN _ RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE EXTENSION, OF RUNWAY 4/22 AT MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is proposing the extension of Runway 4/22at the Minneapolis -:St. Paul International Airport for the purpose of increasing the capacity of the preferential runway system configurations, and WHEREAS, the MAC has proposed as an integral ,part of such an extension a southerly turn procedure for a significant proportion of the air traffic departing Runway 22, and WHEREAS, the MAC has asserted but has not conclusively proven the benefit of such southerly-tu-rn-to-thezesidents of Bloomington and Richfield most affected by the runway extension, and WHEREAS, the headings suggested by the MAC for such a. procedure would approach 170 degrees, and WHEREAS, aircraft using such headings and diverting from them will tend to overfly large portions of the City of Eagan at altitudes well below and at frequencies well above those currently experienced by the community, and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has aggressively planned for noise compatible land uses where it has anticipated the presence of aircraft overflights, and WHEREAS, such land uses are not existent or planned in the areas to be most severely impacted by the addition of a.southerly heading.procedure from Runway 22, and WHEREAS, the Eagan -Mendota Heights boundary currently absorbs about one-half of all arrivals and departures at MSP and the addition of more low -altitude overflights will add further to this disproportionate impact and place an undue burden on the area, and WHEREAS, the extension of Runway 4/22 has the potential to increase the operational• capacity of Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport by allowing departures to the southwest without minimizing the capacity for departures over south Minneapolis, 'NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan opposes the Runway 4/22 extension as currently proposed including the southerly turn procedure and that the MAC not proceed with plans for its implementation, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan insist that the MAC, in carrying out its noise abatement strategy to concentrate the most noise on the fewest people, acknowledge that such noise is an adverse environmental impact resulting from the conduct of airport business and that the MAC adopt a policy of conducting Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact Statements for procedural changes as well as capital improvements so that objective standards of proof and public process may supplant presumptions of costs and benefits in MAC decisions affecting airport neighbors, and—.... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City of Eagan requests that the MAC, through its EIS process, study fully the projected impacts of the Runway 4/22 extension and the southerly turn -procedure as separate and unique changes with separate and unique impacts such that their costs and benefits not be comingled or misunderstood and that the MAC recognize as invalid for comparison those data compiled during the two year test of the Burnsville Turn since such information was gathered using take -off points and flight tracks unique from those currently proposed. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL BY: Its Mayor ATTEST: Its Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: r Those in Favor: Those Opposed: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled on this day of , 1986. E -.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan / �4 2 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS Item 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Road) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received for the upgrading. of Wescott Roadf om Lexington Avenue to one-half mile east. Enclosed on page/? is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the Engi- neer's Estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on March 19, 1986. All bids will be checked for accuracy with a formal bid award recommendation being provided by the Public Works Director at the Council meeting on June 17. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-13 (Wescott Road') and award the contract to the lowest., responsible bidder. /d , Our File No. 49381 WESCOTT ROAD UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS M.S.A_.P. NO. 195-106-04 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-13 CITY PROJECT NO. 467 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986 NO CONTRACTORS TOTAL BASE BID 1. Northdale Construction $456,053.50 2. Ceca Utilities 460,429.70 3. Lake Area Utility 472,406.33 ® 4. GL Contracting 516,209.20 Engineer's Estimate ---------------- $427,000.00 Feasibility Report Est. 492„330.00 % Over Engineer's Estimate +6.8% o Under Feasibility Report Estimate -7.4% NO Agenda Information Memo June 17, 19&6, City Council Meeting Page Forty -One PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued) Item 2. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids Award Contract (Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received for the installation of streets and utilities to service the proposed Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addi- tion. Enclosed on pageJCd is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bid the Engineer's Estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 20, 1986. All bids will be checkedfor accuracy with the formal bid award recommendation being provided by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 Council meeting. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-16 (Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. • • Our File No. 49390 CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-16 EAGAANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS, PROJECT NO. 474 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA CONTRACTORS 1. 0.& P Contracting 2. Lake Area Utility 3. Northdale Construction 4. Nodland Associates 5. G.L. Contracting 6. L & G Rehbein ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----------------- Feasibility Report Estimate % Over Engineer's Estimate 8 Under Feasibility Report Estimate /90 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C_D.S.T. BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $215,684.85 219,307.30 222,458.50 232,498.00 237,273.76 243,439.50 $210,000.00 233,900.00 +2.7% -7.8% Agenda InformationMemo, June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty -Two PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (.continued) Item 3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract ('Sperry Consolidation Facility) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received for the installation of internal access roads and utilities to service the proposed Sperry consolidation facility to be financed by tax increment funds. Enclosed on page /q7/ is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the Engineer's Estimate. Due to the fact that this is financed through tax increment funds, there was no formal feasibility report estimate prepared. All bids will be checked for accuracy and a recommendation for formal contract award will ® be provided by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract '86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility) and award the con- tract to the lowest responsible bidder. A /V CITY OF EAGAN Bid Opening PROJECT: Sperry Consolidation Facility Utility and Street Improvements City Contract No. 86-17 BID DATE: Friday, June 13, 1986' BID TIME: 11:00 A.M. C.S.T. Name of Bidder Total Base Bid is 1. Northdale Construction $448,234.05 2. Ceca Utilities 450,195.00 3. G.L. Contracting 508,788.90 4. J. P. Norex, Inc. 530,111.99 5. Nodland Construction 552,046.50 Engineer's Estimate---------------- $471,534.75 % Under Engineer's_Estimate -5 % Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty -Three PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued) Item 4. Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Daniel Drive) --Contract 86-18 provides for the upgrading of Daniel Drive with streets and utilities under Project 475 as necessary to service the proposed Northview Meadows 2nd Addi- tion. This project was approved at a public hearing held on June 17. This contract also incorporates the trunk watermain installation interconnecting the City's high and intermediate pressure zones through the proposed Rahncliff 1st Addition under Project 468. Because there are no assessments associated with this trunk water installation, there was no formal public hearing. However, ® the feasibility report was presented to the Council for their review and approval at the May 21 Council meeting. • All easements necessary for the installation of these proposed improvements will be dedicated with the respective subdivisions which are anticipated to be completed prior to formal contract award. Our consulting engineer and Director of Public Works will be available to discuss the details associated with these proposed improvements at the June 17 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and order advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on June 27, 1986. /93 Agenda Information Memo June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Forty -Four 5 YEAR COUNTY HIGHWAY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS D. Five Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects --Very shortly, Dakota County will be reviewing and updating their Five - Year CIP for highway improvements. They have requested each community to review their ,previously approved Five -Year CIP to reaffirm the proposed schedule and to identify any additional projected county improvements that may be required that have not been previously identified or included. Enclosed on pages iqs through -96 is the county Five -Year CIP, identifying both the existing scheduled improvements (Part A) and additional needs anticipated by proposed future development and population growth.. With the county wanting to establish a firm program of future county road improvements for proper advance planning, they want to be assured that the City agrees with the schedule and is willing to commit its resources to make these joint projects a reality. At the May 21 Council meeting,, the Council directed staff to evaluate potential future signalization needs th-roughout the city. Enclosed on page '`'`F is a map of the city showing existing signals and future signals. All of the future signals have been identified on the county Five -Year CIP program previously discussed. Several of these signals will be installed as a part of the related county road improvement and others would be by separate contract installation. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail any questions regarding any of the information presented under this item at the June 17 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: request for county road improvements. i9�z Prepare a Five -Year CIP • ® DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY 5 YEAR C.I.P. A. SCHEDULED EST. CITY YEAR CO. RD. NAME LOCATION TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT COST 1986• 26 Lone Oak Road at Lexington Avenue Signal 25,000 1986 28 Yankee Doodle T.H. 13 to Federal Dr. 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 900,000 1986 28 Yankee Doodle I -35E to Lexington 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 762,000 1986 32 Cliff Road T.H. 3 to Inver Grove 2 Lane Grading & Base 28,000 --=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Heights 1987 31 Pilot Knob I -35E to Rebecca Lane 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 1,650,000 1987 32 Cliff Road Pilot Knob to Johnny 4 Lane Reconstruction & Signals 650,000 Cake 1987 32 Cliff Road T.H. 3 to Inver Grove 2 Lane Paving 11,000 Heights v` 1987 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 32 Cliff Road at Rahn Road Signal 75,000 1988 26 Lone Oak at Eagandale Blvd Signal 75,000 1988 32 Cliff Road at Blackhawk/Galaxie Signal 40,000 1988 43 Lexington Ave. Yankee Doodle to Diffley 4 Lane Reconstruction 840,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1989 26 Lone Oak Lexington to T.H. 55 4 Lane Reconstruction 525,000 1989 30 Diffley Pilot Knob to I -35E. 4 Lane Reconstruction 575,000 1989 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 Diffley at Blackhawk Signal 40,000 1990 31 Pilot Knob Rebecca to Apple Valley 4 Lane Reconstruction 450,000 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL $6,646,000 *Delay Proposed by County to Later Year B. ADDITIONAL NEEDS EST. EST. CITY YEAR CO. RD. NAME LOCATION TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT COST 1987 28 Yankee Doodle at Denmark Signal 40,000 1987 31 Pilot Knob at Duckwood Signal 50,000 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1988 28 Yankee Doodle Lexington to T.H. 149 4 Lane Reconstruction 850,000 1988 31 Pilot Knob at Corporate Center Dr. Signal 60,000 1988 31 Pilot Knob at I-494 Ramps Signal 10,000 1988------ 31------ Pilot at Towerview Rd. Signal 50,000 �bl�l -Knob --- 1989 31 Pilot Knob at Deerwood Signal 45,000 1991 30 Diffley at Lexington Avenue Signal 50,000 1991 30 Diffley at Daniel Drive Signal 50,000 1991 30 Diffley Lexington to T.H. 3 4 Lane Reconstruction 1,300,000 5 YEAR SUBTOTAL $2,505,000 GRAND TOTAL 5 YEAR NEEDS $9,151,000 0 77IAsv&ng A MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 13, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION At our Management By Objectives session held this past winter, there was a brief discussion regarding future reorganization within the Fire Department that would provide for full-time administration. With the recent announcement by Bob Childers that he is retiring, effective July 6, as the volunteer Fire Chief, it is timely that an organizational review and budget .analysis be provided for consideration later this summer when the 1987 budget is developed. A memo was prepared, a copy is enclosed on pages ?0/ through 70Y ,that formally notifies the Fire Department that organizational changes to the Fire Administration will be given consideration this summer, during the development of the 1987 budget. VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Recently there has been discussion at City Council meetings concern- ing the number of variances that are processed for building construction within the community. Approximately every other meeting the City Council receives one or two variance requests and there has been a growing philosophy that variances be dis- couraged, if at all possible, by the City staff. City staff has typically and will continue to discourage variances and even work closer with builders and developers to emphasize that variances are 'for hardships and there is a .reason why a plat is approved with certain lot sizes and dimensions. I asked Administrative Assistant Hohenstein to research the number of variances for residential permits that have been issued over the last 4-5 years and determine what that relationship is to the number of permits issued. Because Eagan is one of the leading communities in the state in terms of building construction and activity there will obviously be more variances. Enclosed on page 203 is a copy of a memo that provides a table illustrating the number of variances and the relationship to residential permits and some additional comments about the staff's review of variances. The City Administrator has sent a letter to all developers and builders discourag-in,q the use of variances, which is also attached on page/ 20 PARK BENCHES You will notice that two (2) park benches have been installed in front of the Municipal Building. Approximately thirty-five of these benches are being placed throughout various parks within our community. Our Park Maintenance Division is pouring the concrete and constructing the park benches. /W AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE At the May _21 City Council meeting, Mayor Blomquist informed the City Council that a meeting had been held with the admini- strative staff from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission and Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant. The purpose of the meeting was to create an informational network to review odor problems that are emitted from the Seneca (Plant and further to review with the MWCC a program to minimize those odors and improve air quality over the 'western part of our,community. As Mayor Blomquist indicated at that City Council meeting, if you have names of persons who are residing in the west side of Eagan who might be interested in serving on this informal air quality task force please let this office know and they will be, invited to committee meetings. Attached is a copy of a press release that was prepared by the MWCC regarding the Air Quality Task Forced .The first meeting was held at 4:30 p.m. yesterday and several concerned citizens who were made aware of this meeting did attend. The next meeting is scheduled for 7:00 'p.m., July 17, at which time a tour of the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant will be conducted for those residents attending the Ai'r Quality Task Force meeting. Members of the Council are certainly welcome to attend and will be kept advised of any and all meetings. Attached on page 4p is a copy.of a list of names of those persons who were in attendance at the Task Force meeting. NATURAL GAS FIRE DEMONSTRATION Enclosed on page M 1 is correspondence from People's Natural Gas regarding a Nat ral Gas fire demonstration that will be sponsored by their company on June 24.. The Eagan Fire Department will be participating. MAY REPORT FOR PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS Enclosed on pages W ff through Q/O is a copy of the May report for Protective Inspections. CORRESPONENCE/MRS. DON SANDBERG Enclosed on pages 2// through y/7i is correspondence from Mrs. Don Sandberg regarding an interest in selling their property to the City for passive/active parkland. The letterwill be sent to the Parks and Recreation Director for Commission review: CORRESPONDENCE/ROBERT FERGUSON Enclosed is a letter to Mayor Blomquist from Bob Ferguson, Principal of Northview Elementary Schoold, ;commending the Eagan Police Department and Officer Larry Billmeyer for the bicycle safety program. CORRESPONDENCE/APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Enclosed is a copy of a letter to Fire Chief Childers and copied to the City Council from the City of Apple Valley, thanking the Fire Department for a recent mutual aid call. P. Z/f,, SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY PLANTS Enclosed on pages Al,`5, through z/ is a copy of a press release from the Metropolitan Council regarding an update on the solid waste resource recovery plants that are currently being planned by Twin City area counties. Action that was taken by Dakota county for their waste energy plant is discussed in this article._ BLUE BELL ICE CREAM OPERATION Enclosed is a letter from ,a representative of Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc., asking for reconsideration by the City Council to allow the ice cream men/women to sell ice cream from a truck throughout neighborhoods in the City of Eagan during summer months. If the City Council is interested in changing the ordinance, copies of the correspondence that was rovided by Blue Bell can be made available for your. review. A, i d 4Lzi /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 40 M MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT IiOHENSTEIN DATE: JUNE 10, 1986 SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION CONCERNING VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Pursuant to your request, I have compiled data for the last five -and -one-half years which consider variance requests as a function of the residential permits which might give rise to them. As you can see by the table which is shown below, variance requests have remained a relatively stable three to four percent of the R-1, R-2 and R-3 building permit totals over the past several years. While not all of ,these variances were granted, a. sizable number of them were approved based on their own merits. It appears that a certain percentage of the residential building activity will result in circumstances for which individuals will • request variances and the current) number of requests is a result of the phenomenal growth level we are experiencing. 1981 198 .,2 1983 1984 19:85 1986 YTD RESIDENTIAL PERMITS 358 392 .659 789 855 469 (R-1, R-2, R-3) VARIANCE REQUESTS 16 10 18 31 24 15 REQUESTS AS PERCENT 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03 OF REQUESTS In addition, the protective inspections department indicates that an average of five to ten potential variance situations per month • are recognized and corrected at' the plan check or foundation permit stage. This means that roughly seventy-five percent of the potential variance requests are caught and corrected without requir- ing a formal variance application. A letter has been prepared for the City Administrator's signature which requests additional attention to this matter on the part of developers and builders. Hopefully this will reduce the number of variance requests still further. A inistrative Assistant JH/mc zo3 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P,0. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE, (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN June 11, 1986.JAMES A. SMITH VAC ELLSON THEODORE WACHTER Coun ll Members THOMAS HEDGES s CIN P minislralor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE The City of Eagan continues to experience an exceptional leveiler,0f growth in both its residential and business communities. Last year, the City had the most building permits of any city in the state. This year we are ahead of that pace. The City intends to continue to foster positive development, but the City Council has expressed concern about two specific side-effects of this growth. 1. Variances. - The City continues to receive a number of variance requests which do not represent true hardships justifying such action. Most often, they result from oversights in the survey or design of a project or an attempt to maximize floor area on a limited lot size. The Council has issued a strong statement that it does not support variances of convenience and that the condi- tions which give rise to such requests should be antici- pated and corrected ahead of time. Variances exist to allow flexibility for demonstrated hardships. 2. Weed Control - City ordinance requires that weeds/grass not be allowed to grow higher than 12" in height, or have gone to seed or are about to go to seed upon any platted or residential lot. It is the duty of the owner to remove or cut such weeds. The City has received an alarming number of complaints this year regarding weeds on vacant lots and asks that developers keep these areas in suitable, maintained conditions. The City Council and staff would appreciate your continued atten- tion to these matters. We enjoy a high degree of quality develop- ment and the little extra work on such details helps preserve the quality of the whole community. If you have any questions on these issues please feel free to contact the City staff. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator TLH/mc ao�Z THE LONE OAK TREE . THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY r.rt MEMO TO: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 10, 1986 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR CHANGES IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION Since May 30 when you unofficially announced your retirement from the EaganVolunteer Fire Department and then more formally in a letter received yesterday, it became appropriate to consider alternatives for the future structure of our fire administration. As you recall, at our late winter management by objectives session, there was discussion by the City Council regarding the hiring of full-time, Fire personnel. Positions that were discussed at that time included a IFire Chief and/or Fire Marshal. There was no formal consideration; however, it'was generally agreed that during the development of the 1987 budget there would be some consideration given to full-time administrative staffing in the Fire Department. The Fire Department is caught in the world of complexities such as administrative practices, insurance liabilities, facility and. . manpower planning and all the other considerations that must be given to a growth community. Our part-time Fire Marshal is no longer able to monitor all commercial, industrial and multifamily buildings throughout the City for proper fire prevention or thoroughly review all fires that occur within the City during the calendar year. Demands are increasing with all facets of fire administration as the community grows. I applaud you and your officers for the time and commitment you have given to our Volunteer Fire, Department. Any consideration and review of full-time staffing should only reflect the • preservation of continuing a job well done and an effort to meet the demands of the future. It is my understanding that District Chief Schindeldecker is considered your assistant chief and will be acting in the capacity of Fire Chief upon your official retirement July 6. It is also my understanding that traditionally the volunteer Fire Chief is elected by the Department and those elections are held in November/December every three (3) years. Recognizing that we are currently in a transition between your administration and a new volunteer Fire Chief, it seems appropriate by the City Council and this office that the City exp.lore all staffing options and review as a part of'the 1987,budget preparation, alternatives that might best suit the Volunteer Fire Department as we consider our future administrative staffing in that department. It is my intention to survey otherjcommunities of comparable size and ask how their fire administration and fire marshal services '201 a are staffed within their departments. A report will be prepared and input provided by your administrative officers during the month of July as budget considerations are furthur developed for review and.consideration by the City Council. Reorganization and change are two of the most feared words in the English vocabulary. Please stress to your fire administration that an organizational review for the future is no reflection on their capability as officers of the Fire Department. It is actually to the contrary and considered to be of a support nature to the Fire Department by the mere fact that the City Council may determine that full-time staffing is necessary in order, to continue and improve upon a level of service that to date has been provided by the volunteerism of our department. I will stay in touch with you, and certainly after July 6 with Dick, relating to the future of the fire administrative staff. Please remember that the City Council has had only a brief discussion at a management by objectives session and as a ® collective body has not had any deliberations or discussion regarding future administrative staffing of the Fire Department. All the information that this office will compile is considered fact finding and will be presented in a report form. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time. r Sincerely, 1vZ61 . d Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Honorable Mayor S City Councilmembers Dick Schindeldecker, Assistant Fire Chief/District Chief Ken Southorn, District Chief TLH/kf ROUGH DRAFT PRESS RELEASE EAGAN AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE METROPOLITAN NTE CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF EAGAN FORM AIR Q`11ALITY TASK FORCE ST. PAUL, June 9, 1986 -- The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) and the City of Eagan have announced the formation of a task force designed to improve air quality in Eagan. The Eagan Air Quality Task Force will investigate MWCC and Eagan citizens' concerns about the odors that have been present for the past several summers in the Minnesota River Valley near MWCC's Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant (3750 Plant Road, Eagan).- MWCC agan). MWCC and Eagan official's have been working together for the past several .months to improve air quality. The Seneca Plant staff recently made a number of process changes to help control any odors emanating from the plant, and odor control systems similar to those used successfully by Duluth's wastewater treatment facility were put into operation late this spring. t An expansion of the Seneca Plant is scheduled to begin in the next two to three years, and the task force will also examine the potential impact of the expansion on Eagan air quality. more 0-51 t EAGAN TASK FORCE Page 2 The mayor of Eagan, Bea Blomquist, and the manager of the Seneca Plant, Jim Wawra, have mailed letters to more than 50 concerned citizens, businesses and local officials inviting them to serve on the task force. -fha )eider Boys in part, "The management of the Seneca Plant is working with the City of Eagan on the formation of an Eagan Air Quality Task Force 6ay the lettms. "you have been selected as a neighboring resident who may have an interest in serving on this committee to work with the Seneca staff in discussing concerns, monitoring problems and recomIknding potential solutions." ® An informational meeting of the task force is scheduled to take \1 lace Thursday, June 12, at 4:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall. The participants will discuss the current situation at the Seneca Plant, air quality in Eagan and the plans for plant expansion. They will also make plans for a future tour of the Seneca Plant. -30- 1 Z.66 �A�Ao AIQ QuAL�ry 'rhsK FoQC� vhT�, %i ipp PEOPLES NATURAL GAS June 2, 1986 Mr. Lowell Bahrke, Training Officer Eagan Fire Department 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 RE: Natural Gas Fire Demonstration 'Dear Lowell: 3958 Sibley Memorial Highway Eagan, Minnesota 55122 612-454-6080 Sometime ago, Chief Childers and you expressed an interest in sending some of your department members to a natural gas fire demonstration. We at Peoples Natural Gas Company combined with Northern Natural Gas Company are pleased to invite your group to a training session to be held on Tuesday, June 24, at 6:30 P.M. at the Northern Natural Gas Company compressor station at Farmington (note enclosed location map). Fire departments participating are Eagan, Rosemount, Farmington, Cannon Falls, Lakeville, New Market and Webster. The demonstrations are designed to familiarize your fire fighters with the basics of natural gas, what to do when there is a fire involving natural gas, and techniques of extinguishing fires involving natural gas (both with hose streams and chemical extinguishers). The types of fires fire fighters will be experiencing are natural gas fueled, discharging from an open pipe horizontally and vertically. Also included will be fires simulating line hits and stored flammable liquid fuels involved in natural gas fueled fires. 40 It should be advised in advance to all fire fighters planning to participate in the actual demonstrations that full turn -out gear will be required. Upon completion of the training session, a lunch will be served at the site. We would appreciate your response by June 16 as to the number of fire fighters attending. Should you have any questions please contact me at 454-6080 or Mark Adelmann with Northern Natural Gas Company in Farmington at 463-7126. e�ly, R eh H. Loca Manager RHL:dlo Enc. cc: /Thomas Hedges, Eagan City Administrator Jay Berthe, Eagan Chief of Police G.F. Lovell, District Manager, Peoples Natural Gas, Farmington, MN 0. C. Reimer, District Manager, Northern Natural Gas, Farmington, MN ?D7 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 152 615 Electrical Plumbing 177 145 692 554 RVAC 137 578 Water Softener 28 134 Signs $ 31,331.50 $ 15,665.75 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank n n 1 40 4-11 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED unvrm: v rM. TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 3 FOUNDATION 0 380 SINGLE FAMILY 80 $ 6,984,000 $ 31,331.50 $ 15,665.75 $ 176 18 DUPLEX 4 298,000 1,426.00 713.00 Am 8,626.0 91 TOWNHOUSE 32 1,791,000 9,593.00 4,796.50 65,989.0 7 CONDO 1 778,000 2,128.00 1,064.00 24,893.(: 0 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 9 COMMERCIAL 3 985,000 3,111.00 1,555.75 26,185.7 21 COMM/IND REMODEL 5 201,600 956.5b 415.75 .1,473.7 2 COMM/IND ADDITION 2 78,000 426.50 213.25 78 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 1 320,000 983.00 .491.50 8,908.5 ' 9 RES. GARAGES 4 22,900 226.00 --- 238.0 11 RES. ADDITIONS 2 20,000 161.00 58.25 229.2 4 SWIM POOL 4 36,900 304.00 55.25 402:7 57 MISCELLANEOUS 14 56,000 645.50 83.50 762.5 0 DEMOLISH 0 HOUSE MOVES 615 TOTALS 152 11,571,400 51,292.50 25,112.50 315,183.01 YEAR-TO-DATE 57,514,650 235,693.Ob 115,578.70 1,484,836.9 rM. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY.REPOBT DATE MAY 1986 MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN TYPE # OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF I UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 4 2 4 $ 298,000 $ 1,426.00 $; 149.00 $ 713.00 $ 8.,626.00 4-PLEX 32 8 32 1,791,000 9,593.00 895.50 4,796.50 65,989.00 6-PLEX L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R 7-PLEX 3595 KRESTWOOD LN STAN SCHULTZ 180,000 633.00 90.00 316.50 6,421.50 COMM/NEI 8-PLEX 1 RST M'HAHA APT. BLDG 1380 DUCKWOOD DR K CHARLES DEV 650,000 1,808.00 325.00 904.00 12,927..00 COMM/NEI 16 -UNIT 1 1 16 778,000 2,128.00 389.00 1,064.00 24,893.00 TOTALS 37 11 52 2,867,000 13,147.00 1,433.50 6,573.50 99,508.00 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 11912 1275 TOWN CENTRE DR BURGER KING $ 155,000 $ 670.50 $ 77.50 $ 335.25 6,837.25 COMM/NEI L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R 11934 3595 KRESTWOOD LN STAN SCHULTZ 180,000 633.00 90.00 316.50 6,421.50 COMM/NEI 1 RST M'HAHA 11992 1380 DUCKWOOD DR K CHARLES DEV 650,000 1,808.00 325.00 904.00 12,927..00 COMM/NEI L 1 B 1 EAGAN CONV CTR 12022 3945 LEXINGTON AVE SO ADVENT UNITED 320,000 983.00 160.00 491.50 8,908.50 P.F./NEI L 1 B 1 ADVENT UNITED METH. CHURCH 11982 4215 NICOLS RD JIM PERSONS 65,000 328.00 32.50 164.00 524.50 COMM/ADI L 2, B 25, SECT 30 11905 3323 RIVER BLUFF DR TORCHWOOD 13,000 98.50 6.50 49.25 154.25 COMM/AD] L 12, B_l, ROBERT KARATZ PROPERTIES 11877 3340 PILOT KNOB RD AM. ASSOC. OF 25,500 175.00 13.00 87.50 275.50 COMM/REI L 6, B 3, EFFRESS ADD CEREAL CHEM. 11993 2600 EAGAN WOODS DR EAGAN WOODS 12,700 98.50 6.50 49.25 154..25 COMM/REI L 1. B 1 EAGAN WOODS LAND LTD PTNE 22996 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 5,400 56.50 3.00 --- 59.50 COMM/RE! L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 ' _h'+{Ya•o-L :.. �!T.ev-.. 4.-NW.aT .� .:. ene'-. ..: •.:: .- ._ �A, -- . ..:: -:........ MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: MAY 1985 C NUMHER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS N VALUATIONS W P N P W W 4 -UNIT O O W O T0WNHOUSE 32 8 32 1,798,000 9,646.00 899.00 4,827.00 67,368.0, 6 -UNIT 1270 EAG AN INp ND bl TOWNHOUSE NO IN NW MTL LIFE 1600 000 4,183.00 800.00 2,091.50 27 129.50 COMM 8 -UNIT 1243 EACAN IND RD LEXINGTON TOWNHOUSE L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1 P r 108.00 Y O O A (1 r r m O a T ri 10,683.00 2,100.00 •-1 Y .� T i 2 m r [al O O y t' y r CA i 36 2,008,000 m 1,004.00 5,404.00 71,217.0 V! r F r ti L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P H i 36.000 220.00 H 110.00 348.00 COMM 1253 EAC IND RD 10236 2..AC CTR IND MJS SYSTEMS 45,000 260.50 22.50 130.25 40.25 W W 10252 L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM 20 P C O 324.00 2,781.00 O O O C O P � N C N I I W O y W 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 'm N _ C P W N m m c C m 0 0 o O o 0 o m 9 W N c 1 1 C m _ 1 u 1 I I I C W T N O U O O m 0 N P O O W W u O C •O � 1 I I P .WO W � c c 0 0 o T m 0 0 o m MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: MAY 1985 BUILDING NUMBER NUMHER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES I CILIRCE FEES TOTAL FEES 4 -UNIT 4955 PILOT KNOB RD T0WNHOUSE 32 8 32 1,798,000 9,646.00 899.00 4,827.00 67,368.0, 6 -UNIT 1270 EAG AN INp ND bl TOWNHOUSE NO IN NW MTL LIFE 1600 000 4,183.00 800.00 2,091.50 27 129.50 COMM 8 -UNIT 1243 EACAN IND RD LEXINGTON TOWNHOUSE L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1 723.00 108.00 361.50 1,192.50 COMM APT. OR 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD CONDO L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100 FED LAND CO 4,200,000 10,683.00 2,100.00 5,341.50 51,415.50 COMM 2-PLEX 4 2 4 210,000 1,162.00 105.00 581.007,849.00` TOTALS 36 10 36 2,008,000 10,808.00 1,004.00 5,404.00 71,217.0 BUILDING PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK PERMIT 8 ADDRESS 4 LEGAL OWNER VALUATIONS FEE CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUr., 10191 4955 PILOT KNOB RD B 78 .F ION 33 T. JEPPESF.N 22,000 3 152.50 11.00 76.25 239.75 ACRIC 1270 EAG AN INp ND bl 10199 NO IN NW MTL LIFE 1600 000 4,183.00 800.00 2,091.50 27 129.50 COMM 10206 1243 EACAN IND RD LEXINGTON L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1 723.00 108.00 361.50 1,192.50 COMM 10209 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100 FED LAND CO 4,200,000 10,683.00 2,100.00 5,341.50 51,415.50 COMM 4175 LEXB54INGTOSF.CTN 7 AVE2J 10216 L NW BELL TELF.P 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM 10235 4178 KNOB DRIVE L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P NOSTALGIC HOME i 36.000 220.00 18.00 110.00 348.00 COMM 1253 EAC IND RD 10236 2..AC CTR IND MJS SYSTEMS 45,000 260.50 22.50 130.25 40.25 COMM 2109 CLIFF RD 10252 L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM FED LAND CO 186,000 648.00 93.00 324.00 2,781.00 COMM LJ1l u I — I<c3p(=>sia .Kerir)els GERMAN SHORTHAIRED POINTERS Puppies - Grown Dogs - Stud Service Eagan City Council 3830 Pilot Knob ad Eagan, MN 55122 Gentlemen: 1560 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MINN. 55121 454.503) — A..A Coo. 612 June 7, 1'986 I have just come home from a run through beautiful Eagan and am moved to write to thank whoever has instituted the system of ® Bike paths.. .Eagan or Dakota County...... with a request to please continue the system. It is a relief to be able to run off the roads whenever possible. I look forward to more bike paths being developed as time goes by. Another thank you to Eagan for the development of so many parks and "green spaces". As our city grows I believe it is very im- portant to coninue to add green space as a buffer for the many housing developments going up. This morning I ran by the new Blue Cross -Blue Shield Neighborhood 'ark which is being developed, and then I ran through Black Hawk Park, on the newly -mowed trail How beautifull Wonderful hill -climbing work, too, for this runner! In this vein, I would like our leaders to consider yet another green space: We own eight acres of land on Yankee Doodle Rd., bordered on the east by Surrey Heights and on the west by the Eagan Water Treatment facility. On our eight acres is a duck pond and it is surrounded by beautiful wooded grounds. Our house is, we believe , one of the pioneer farmhouses in Eagan (our deed reads 1890) and when we moved here in 1956 to Eagan Township, was known as "The Old Heimel Place". Yankee Doodle was a narrow dirt country lane and there was nothing else out here except a few farms. One cannot stop progress, however, and now Eagan is a busy growing progressive city. Our back pasture (Dr. Lyle Hay's land) has been sold and is being developed now for individual homes.. . It has occurred to us that it might be very smart of Eagan to set aside this picturesque chunk of land as green space -park, for the en- joyment of all the people who presently live in Surrey Heights and will be living in the new development in the back pasture. Walking "nature trails" could be developed, and picnic areas here and there. The house could possibly be maintained as a pioneer farmhouse...... When a it stop breeding better dogs -- You stop breeding good dogs or removed to make way for more useable space along the Yankee Doodle, Rd. segment. If Eagan would be interested in seeing our land and/or talking about it, we will be pleased to hear from you. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely yours, C - Mrs. D Sandberg INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 19.6 14445 DIAMOND PATH ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068 June 5, 1986 Mayor Bea Blomquist City Hall " 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY ■ROBERT E. FERGUSON 454-4134 Dear Mayor Blomquist, In behalf of the students and the faculty at Northview School, I would like • to express our deep gratitude to the Eagan Police Department for furnishing us with Officer Larry Billmeyer and his Intern Officer for our Bicycle Safety Program. It was extremely successful even if we did have rain on the first day. We resumed the program on the following Monday morning and completed it on that day. For the past four years that we have had this program at Northview School we have not experienced any fatal accidents of students who have been in this program. _I think it is a fantastic program. I would like to compliment Officer Billmeyer and Police Chief Jay Berthe for cooperating with us in this community endeavor. I would also like to thank the Eagan Police Department for the School Patrol picnic that they sponsored. It was just outstanding to have the local Police Department work so closely with the schools and the school patrol, thus making it possible for our studentsto arrive and leave school as safely as possible. Sincerely, Robert E. Fergua`on d/6 APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE CHIEF 14200 Cedar Avenue Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 June 3, 1986 Fire Chief Bob Childers Eagan Fire Department 3800 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Chief Childers, Once again I would like to offer our sincere thanks to your department for responding to our mutual aid call for help. Yesterday, June 2, our department was in Rosemount helping their department fight a structure fire. The call required our department to utilize all our rigs and manpower, which left Apple Valley without fire -,coverage. Thanks to your department we felt secure in the knowledge that your dedicated firefighters could and would respond to our mutual aid call. Again, thank you cooperation and assistance. Sincerely, APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Richard W. Tuthill Fire Chief It XC: Eagan City Council'/ • r. c... immediate Release: REPRINTED FROM JUNE METRO MONITOR For more information contact the Public Information Office 612/291.6464 Sen Reddick 291-6422 Five Solid Waste Resource Recovery Friday, Plants Now Planned for Region May 30; 1986 This year, and for every year in recent memory, 95 percent of the region's trash will be hauled to landfills to be unceremoniously buried. is That's about to change. Five big solid waste resource recovery plants are currently being planned by Twin Cities Area counties and private firms. Together, the plants will be capable of handling more than 4,000 tons of trash every day, or about 72 percent of the region's trash. Last month Dakota County decided'to build a waste -to -energy plant that --would process about 735 tons of'trash per day. The resource recovery company, P.L.M. Selberg's/Westinghouse, will own and operate the $90'million plant, to be"built in Rosemount: The project will house an operation to produce refuse - derived fuel (RDF) from trash, and boilers and generators to convert it into electrical energy... The project's fuel production will be accomplished with equipment made by Swentec, Inc., a Swedish firm. Westinghouse will burn the fuel and sell the electrical energy to Northern States Power Co. Dakota County decided against sending its garbage to a joint Ramsey/Washington County trash -to -energy plant in Newport, the region's only trash -processing plant currently under construction. The Ramsey/Washington plant, owned and operated by NSP, is scheduled to begin operation in the fall of 1987. The plant will take 1,000 ton�trash per day from the two counties and turn it into RDF. NSP will burn the RDF to produce electricity at its power plants in Red Wing and Mankato. Construction is projected to cost $31 million. Annual operating costs will range from $5 million to $7 million. The plant will recover materials such as iron and aluminum for recycling. Hennepin County plans to start construction of a third big plant, a $70 million garbage -burning plant to be located in downtown Minneapolis, in the spring of 1987. The plant, to be located at 5th St. N. and 6th Av. N., will burn 1,000 tons of trash per day beginning in 1990. The Hennepin plant, intended to greatly reduce the need for landfill space in the region, will get its trash from Hennepin County, excluding Minneapolis and three other cities (see Reuter project below). The trash will come from four "transfer stations," located throughout the county. Transfer stations are to be located in Bloomington, Brooklyn Park and Minneapolis. Last month the Hennepin County Board decided to look at locating the fourth transfer station in Eden Prairie instead of Hopkins. The Council is preparing a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on the plant and transfer sites for the county. It will issue the EIS for public review June 129 and will vote on the adequacy of the study June 26. Reuter, Inc. has laid the footings for the region's fourth major resource recovery project. It's a $9 million effort in Eden Prairie that will -turn 400 tons a day of mixed municipal solid waste into fuel pellets. The plant, which will have an annual operating budget of $4 million, is expected to be up and running in October. Minneapolis is negotiating a contract with the company to provide 350 tons of trash per day. Hopkins, Minnetonka and Shorewood have agreed to provide another 50.tons per day. Reuter plans to turn at least half the waste it receives into combustible more v4 Pellets for sale to firms that currently burn coal or natural gas. About 15 percent of the waste will be glass, metals and plastics, which will be separated and recycled. In the second year of operation, the company plans to compost a portion of the residuals. The Council recommended approval of Reuter's facility permit request in March. "If Hennepin Council would give us the garbage, we'd like to build another 400 -ton -per -day plant in the: county," said James Reuter, vice president. "The county has a lot of garbage left that needs to find a home, but not in the ground." NSP will build, own and operate the region's f fth.resource recovery plant, ® with a capacity of 1,000 tons per day, in Sherburne.County.'s Elk. River. Trash will come from Anoka County and possibly more from Hennepin and other counties north and west of the seven -county region. The $53 million plant will produce RDF to be burned for electrical power primarily at United Power Assoc., a utility in Elk River. The plant, scheduled to begin operation in 1989, is expected to have an annual operating budget of $8.7 million. The -project will separate and recycle iron, aluminum and possibly other materials. Scott and Carver Counties are currently negotiating with firms to build a resource recovery plant to serve their areas. -30- a17 *(I1 a X11 )Iemi, , 3218 Snelling Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55406 - 61'1-729-5205 April 5, 1986 City Administrator Thomas Hedges t830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN. 55121 Dear Mr. Hedges, For the past seven years the Blue Bell Ice Cream truck has been a summer companion to thousands of Eagan residents young and old alike. I am..writing this letter in the hope that I can convince the council to allow us to operate in Eagan once again. Late last summer I received a letter from the City explaininq that Eagan City Code,. sec. 9.15 —Prohibiting parking for the purpose of advertising or ceiling merchandise, was going to be strictly enforced. We complied with the request and did not operate after receiving the letter. We did however receive numerous calls (not just from children) inquiring as, to the Whereabouts of the "ice cream man". The point in the letter requesting we cease operation mentioned a safety hazard. We consider ourselves a very safety conscious company and train our drivers extensively with both written and slide safety programs. In support of our safety record I would like to present certain facts: We have operated in Eagan from approximately May ist through September 1st each year. The truck works an average of six days per week and sells an average of 200 ice cream bars per day. That means over our seven years of operation vie have sold about 150,000 ice cream bars. In all this time and with all those sales we have never had a single accident take place. I feel this is an excellent record and if we are allowed to operate again our commitment to safety will remain just as strong. I am enclosing a letter from our insurance carrier explaininq our limits of liability and our safety record. I am also enclosing the results of a recent Saturday afternoon survey we took in Eagan asking people if they wanted to have the ice cream truck back in their neighborhoods. I am happy to report that at least 98. of the people we asked said they saw no reason we should not be allowed to operate. In recent, years the cities of Richfield, St. Louis Park, Mound and Fridley have altered their ordinances to allow ice cream trucks. I am enclosing a copy of a letter from the city manager of Richfield explaining his experience with Blue Bell. (The letter was originally written to the city of St. Cloud in support of our application to vend there.) I am also enclosing copies of the altered ordinances from these cities in the hope they can be used as a model in Eagan. WI, W The Blue Feil truck has .also provided a welcome summer job, usuilly for an Eagan college student. In conclusion, we are asking that the council consider a way for the "ice cream man/women" to be able to come back to Eagan. We feel our record shows that we have been a responsible and safety conscious company. We also feel we have provided a desired service in a fun and positive manner. I would be happy to work with the city to develop a ordinance that would allow our operation. Thant: you for your consideration of this proposal. Sincerely; r �n Glenn Baron Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc. '219