06/17/1986 - City Council RegularADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN., MINNESOTA
JUNE 17, 1986
C�1i�:V4tiZ�] i�i�►7
Item 1. O'Neil Vs City of Eagan
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Sncrease in Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds
Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit
2Za
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 16, 1986
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
Item 1. O'Neil vs. City of Eagan --City Attorney Hauge is planning
to provide an update on the current status of the O'Neil vs. City
of Eagan lawsuit. To date, Mr. O'Neil has not signed the letter
of understanding between the City of Eagan and Mr. O'Neil that
both parties will not proceed with depositions, discovery or any
other findings related to the lawsuit until the Comprehensive
Guide Plan update is completed. Enclosed on pages ZZy through
is a copy of a resolution that the City Attorney would like
to discuss with the City Council after the meeting on Tuesday.,
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Increase in Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds --The City held public hearings and granted a
multifamily housing revenue bond issued in the amount of
$10,000,000.00 for the Thomas Lake Apartment Project. The devel-
oper, Dominium Group, is requesting that the Inducement Resolution
be changed to allow the amount of multifamily housing revenue
bonds to increase from $10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00. Reasons
for changing the amount of the Inducement Resolution are outlined
in a letter from the Doninium Group and bond counsel, Holmes and
Graven, found on pages laa through ZZ Any change in the
resolution would require a public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a public
hearing to be scheduled at the July 1 City Council meeting for the
purpose of considering a change in the Inducement Resolution for
the Thomas Lake Apartment that would increase the amount of bonds
from 10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00.
Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit --Enclosed is a memorandum
from City Planner Runkle to the City Administrator regarding the
Wachovia Indirect Source Permit. The City Administrator and City
Planner would like to briefly review this permit with the City
Council. p. ZZ 4 Z30,
/s/Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
27-1
RESOLUTION
CITY OF EAGAN
1986
5-9-86
Draft Only
WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council in early 1985 directed the City staff and
consulting planner to commence the planning process in order to review the
Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan last prepared in 1980; and
WHEREAS, the study was commenced in early 1985 by the staff consulting
planner for a complete review of the Lana Use Guide, including residential,
commercial and industrially designated areas; and
WHEREAS, the statutory basis for the lana use planning within a statutory
city is found in Minnesota Statutes Annotated 462.355 including provisions for
adoption and amendment to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; and
WHEREAS, an application was submitted to the City of Eagan by Robert
O'Neil and Grace O'Neil for the rezoning from A -Agricultural, to PD-Plannea
Development, for approximately 100 acres located in the south half of Section
10, north of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lexington Avenue and east of I -35E,
which was first considered at a public hearing of the Advisory Planning
Commission on May 28, 1985; and
WHEREAS, John Voss, the Eagan Consulting Planner, aid in a memorandum to
the City dated , 1985 suggest that the existing commercial -
type zoning within the City may be adequate for future development at the
current rate of commercial development within the City and as compared with
the amount of zoning and development in other metropolitan area suburban
municipalities; and
v7�
J
WHEREAS, at the time of the application submittea by Robert O'Neil the
zoning of the property was Agricultural and R-4, Multiple Residential, and the
lana use designation provided for an R -III density allowing for six to twelve
residential unite per acre; and
WHEREAS, an action was brought by the O'Neils against the City on or about
October 10, 1985 for specific relief, including a request that the City
Council approve the rezoning of the property as requested; and
WHEREAS, the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission submitted a recommendation
to the City Council regarding the application and the Eagan City Council acted
upon the application at its regular meeting on July 16, 1986; and
WHEREAS, in September of 1985 the City Council scheduled a special ,joint
meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council which first
met on October 7, 1985 to commence the Comprehensive Guide update process and
subsequently met as a ,joint committee on November 26, 1985, December 12, 1985,
January 23, 1986 and March 11, 1986; and
WHEREAS, prior to the action by the City Council on the application
submitted by the O'Neils, the City Council indicated that it has initiated
proceedings before the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council to
review the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan last adopted in 1980 and the City
has since that time continued to review the plan in detail; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the Comprehensive Guide
review process including residential, commercial and industrial uses and
proposed to the O'Neils that the action mentioned above be held in abeyance to
allow the City to proceed with the Comp Guide review; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at its regular meeting on March 19, 1986 adopted
a resolution directing the staff and the Advisory - Planning Commission together
with the Council to proceed with the Guide review process covering all
��3
applicable parcels and uses of land throughout the City subject, however, to
the entry into a stipulation between Robert and Grace O'Neil and the City of
Eagan providing for a 180 -day stay of the ,O'Neil civil action within which
time the City will proceed with its.Comp Guide planning process including
review and action of all commercial comprehensive guide planning within the
City; and
WHEREAS, there are numerous other parcels of property within the City that
are designated commercial use in the Land Use Plan or proposed to be
designated commercial use and it is necessary and expedient that the City
proceed with the Comprehensive Guide process including the commercial portion
of the Guide; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has attempted in good faith with unanimous
action at its March 19, 1986 meeting to proceed to resolve the action
commenced by the O'Neils including the submission of the proposed stipulation
based upon discussions with the attorney and representative of the O'Neils
together with representatives of the City; and
WHEREAS, although the O'Neils have not been willing to enter into a
Stipulation for the Stay of Proceedings during the Comp Guide review process,
the City Council has directed.the City representatives to meet and attempt to
negotiate a stay of the proceedings in order to allow the Comprehensive Guide
review to continue for the reasons that are described above;
NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by seconded by ,
it was Resolved as follows: -
1. That the Eagan City Council hereby directs the staff and the Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission, including the Council, to proceed with the
Comprehensive Guide review process covering all applicable parcels and uses of
land throughout the City, and further directs the planning consultant and
Zz�(
planning staff to provide appropriate studies and reports concerning the
Comprehensive Plan. for review and ultimate action by the Advisory Planning
Commission and City Council.
Dated:
Those in favor:
Thoseagainst:
ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF EAGAN
By: By.
E.J.an ver a e, .ler Beatta Blomquist, Mayor
zz�
1
rruup incorporated
3140 HARBOR LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 6121559-1711
June 12, 1986
Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
RE: REQUEST TO REVISE INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR THOMAS LAKE
APARTMENTS
Dear Mr. Hedges:
We respectfully request that we be allowed to advertise this
week for a public hearing on July 1, 1986 to increase the
previously approved Inducement Resolution on the above
referenced project from $10,000,000.00 to $11,875,000.00. It
is of critical importance that the public hearing be held at
the regularly scheduled July 1, 1986 City Council meeting in
order to accomplish a July 31, 1986 project closing date as
required in our financing commitment. If the public hearing is
held on July 1, 1986, we have to publish a notice prior to June
15, 1986.
We are requesting that the Inducement Resolution be increased
for several reasons. First and most importantly, we have been
severely restricted in our ability to secure the types and
sources of financing commitments that we had earlier
contemplated using, because of the proposed changes being made
by the Senate and Congress to our current tax laws. The
financing commitment that we were able to secure requires that
we incorporate within the project longer periods of capitalized
interest thus increasing the total cost of the development. In
addition, we have made significant improvements to the project
in terms of amenities that will be provided to our residents
directly and indirectly. We have spent considerable time in
exploring ways to preserve larger areas of natural vegetation
by utilizing greater amounts of retaining walls than we had
initially proposed. The community facility has been greatly
upgraded in terms of recreational amenities and size. Lastly,
we have made significant improvements to the unit interiors by
providing such extra amenities as European cabinets,
microwaves, wood trim and paneled doors to mention a few items.
77-6
i
June 12, 1986
Mr. Tom Hedges
Page Two
Your cooperation in accommodating our request would be greatly
appreciated. Barbara Portwood, our bond counsel at Holmes and
Graven, has indicated that she will send you a procedural and
time schedule that will outline those items that have to be
completed in order to accommodate a July 31, 1986 closing date
on this development. Please give me a call to discuss this
issue further.
Sincerely,
AEB/sl
E
0
zz7
BARBARA L. PORTWOOD
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9213
June 13, 1986
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 737-9700
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Re: $10,000,000
City of Eagan
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds
(Thomas Lake Apartments Project)
Series 1986
Dear Mr. Hedges:
Jack Safar, the developer of the above -referenced project has indicated to me that
he is negotiating with a tax-exempt bond fund for the sale of the above -referenced
bonds. Yesterday I spoke with the attorney for the fund who tells me that the
bonds must be closed by July 31st in order to be purchased by the fund.
A financing program for this project was approved by the City of Eagan and
reviewed by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA") last year.
However, because the developer proposes to increase the size of the issue to
$11,875,000, the program must be amended following a public hearing for which
notice must be published 15 days in advance. Following the public hearing the
program must be submitted to MHFA and not rejected for 30 days. In order to
meet these procedural requirements and close by July 31, 1986, notice would have
to be published on Friday, June 13th or Saturday, June 14th and a public hearing
would have to be held by the Eagan City Council on July 1st.
The purpose for this letter is to request that a public hearing be scheduled for July
1 and to request your permission to cause notice of the public hearing (in the
attached form) to be published.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Barbara L. Portwood
BLP:ds
cc: Jack Safar
Armand Brachman Z2g'
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE
DATE: JUNE 13, 1986
SUBJECT: WACHOVIA INDIRECT SOURCE PERMIT
The purpose of .this memorandum is to convey activities surrounding
the Wachovia Indirect Source Permit (ISP). This memorandum. will
describe the purpose of an ISP and when a permit will be issued to
Wachovia. Material contained herein is for your information, and I
will continue to keep you informed as the ISP approval process
proceeds.
Project Description.
In early 1986, Wachovia Bank and Trust Company of North Carolina
purchased 267 acres of the Laukka-Beck planned development. The
Wachovia site is located in the south and west one half of the
Laukka-Beck planned development and situated south of Northwest
Orient's Corporate Headquarters. It is anticipated that the
Wachovia site will result in 3,376,510 square feet of mixed use
commercial development with construction to commence in 1987 and
conclude no later than the year 2020.
Indirect Source Permit.
An ISP is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
when a concentration of air polluting sources are attracted to a
specific development site, and as a consequence will produce a
significant increase in air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide
and (CO emissions). The principal source of air pollutants in the
case of Wachovia are automobiles, retail and commercial facilities,
parking facilities and adjacent roadways. Based on air quality
projections prepared by BRW Engineering, the Wachovia site will not
exceed 8 -hr. average state standards for CO, though a permit is
required by MPCA because the site will have more than 1,000 parking
stalls.
At present, the Wachovia ISP authorizes the construction of
2,296,510 square feet of mixed use commercial development through
the year 2005 and specifically permits 11,732 parking spaces. A
second Wachovia ISP will be required in the future to construct the
remaining 1,080,000 square feet of mixed use commercial development
which is planned to commence in the year 2005.
ZZ�
Memo to City Administrator Hedges
June 13, 1986
Page 2
Current Activities.
The Planning Department met with Suzanne Pelly of the MPCA in late
April, 1986, for the purpose of reviewing an initial draft of the
Wachovia ISP. Staff has continued to participate in negotiations
with MPCA and Wachovia representatives for purposes of communicating
the City's interests. The 30 day comment will begin in the near
future and upon its conclusion an ISP will be issued to Wachovia by
MPCA. Once this permit has been issued, Wachovia may begin
construction activity.
The Planning Department will continue to follow activities surround-
ing the Wachovia ISP approval process and inform you when the permit
has been issued by MPCA. Please contact me if you have any
questions or concerns regarding this matter.
D2 \
City Planner
DR/SS/hb
7 36
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
JUNE 17, 1986
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF=ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35'- ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department
�,5 B. Public Works Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
A. Contractor Licenses
1z B. Personnel Items
C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition
ISD. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob
Road - Trunk Storm Sewer)
E. 1986 Amusement Device Renewals
�$
F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals
.� o.IG. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals
:Z1H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility
o( -I. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing
(Deerwood School Addition)
�•_-�-J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (,Highview
Avenue - Streets)
ZL K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office Park
2nd Addition)
::n L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition)
D.20 M. Approve Final Plat, T.E.M. Addition
,i e.%DN. Approve Final Plat, Hampton Heights Addition
t.
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
(�•3 1A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of
Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City
P.33 B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets &
Utilities)
P,s�{C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458, (Eagandale Center
Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1,
1986, City Council Meeting
1 1 D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project ,471, (West Service Drive -
Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1,, 1986, Meeting
�j E. Public Hearing for Project 444R, (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm
QSewer Outlet)
VI. OLD BUSINESS
'A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment
Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development
District X11
�? Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis
Johnson) Continued from May 21, 1986, City Council Meeting
Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - Cul de Sac Reconsideration
�p�D..
Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign
VII. NEW BUSINESS
0-'A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) for a
Pylon Sign on Lot '2, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition
Located Yankee Doodle Road, West of Pilot Knob Road, NE 1/4 of
Section 16
B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign
Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE
Quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Lot 1,
Block 1, NE 1/4 of Section 16
C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard) from Setback Requirements
for Expansion & Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station Located on
Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE Quadrant of
Yankee Doodle Road & Washington Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 16
k -:)5D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon Sign for
an Office/Warehouse Located Silver Bell & Highway 13, SE 1/4 of
the SE 1/4 of Section 18
13$E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motec
P Transmission) for a Pylon Sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray
Addition Located Cedarview Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 19
140F. Conditional Use Permit (R. Kaye Scheurenbrand) for a Commercial
Boarding Kennel on Approximately 5.8 Acres Located South of
A Cliff Road and East of Dodd Road, NE 1/4 of Section 36
G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life (Opus Corp) to Split
Lot 18 and Combine the N 1/2 with Lots 19 & 20, Creating a new
4 -Acre Parcel Loacted North of Lone Oak Road on West Service
Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, Part of SE 1/4
5 of Section 12
C,� fH. _Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD (Planned Development) to R-1
(Single Family Residential) for Approximately 111 Acres Located
East of T.H. 149.& South of T.H. 55, SE 1/4 of Section 12
�(e'jI. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Sideyard Setback Require-
ment for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition, Located East of
Galaxie Avenue on West Wind Tr., NW 1/4 of Section 32
p \45 J. Special Permit (Overhill Replat - Grand Oaks Development) to
Allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval, Located at Lot 2,
Block 4, Overhill Farms 2nd Addition Replat, East of Dodd, North
of Hay Lake Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25
pkl 3K. 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance
\ Renewal
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses on
\ Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh,
2882 Sibley Memorial Highway, West of Highview Park, 5112
1 Section 4
B. .Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee
\ C. Public Improvement Contracts
.P lV 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Rd)
1 ,1$32. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Eagandale Lemay
1 Lake 2nd Addition
\0\3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Sperry
P ` Consolidation Facility
Dp Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids
(Daniel Drive)
A. Five -Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects
I%. VISITORS TO BE REARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
Z.
S. ADJOURNMENT ,,
l_1
40
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 12, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE-'MINUTES]
After approval is given to the June 17, 1986, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the June 3 meeting, the following
items are in order for consideration:
DEPARTMENT;HEAD:;BUSINESS
A. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. 3M Presentation of a Resusci Junior ---Mr. Tom Hutter, branch
operations manager of the Twin Cities sale center at the 3M plant
located in Eagan, will present a resusci junior to the Eagan
Fire Department. Since two of our firefighters, Scott Wood and
Jim Mueller, have given instruction time for the CPR training,
they would like to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and
Jim on behalf of all the employees involved in this training
at 3M. Chief Childers and firefighters Wood and Mueller. will
be at the meeting for the presentation. Enclosed on page _ J
is a copy of a letter that was sent by Mr. Hutter to Fire Chief
Childers, regarding the equipment and the official recognition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: There is no formal action
required. However, the minutes should reflect the acceptance
of a monetary receipt for specialized fire department equipment.
f
Twin Cities Sales Center/31Y!
PO Box 33211
St. Paul, Minnesota 551333211
3130 Lexington Avenue South
Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2239
612/733 3300
May 28, 1986
Mr. Robert Childers
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Childers:
Two of your firemen, Scott Wood and Jim Mueller gave
unselfishly of their time to furnish instruction in
the art of CPR to several of our 3M employees. We
would like to express our appreciation for this ser-
vice by presenting you with the enclosed check for
$375.00 to be used for the purchase of a Resusci
Junior which I understand is a mannequin used for
water rescue and resuscitation training.
If possible, we would like you to make arrangements
to purchase this through your normal channels and then
advise us when it would be convenient for us to present
this to you in a formal ceremony at one of your meetings
or at a City Council Meeting. At that time I would plan
to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and Jim on
• behalf of all of the employees involved in this training
and 3M. Leroy Kugel, as our on-site representative, would
also accompany me for this presentation.
I would appreciate your giving me a call or dropping me
a note as to the time and place that it would be appropriate
for this presentation.
On behalf of 3M and our employees I want to thank you for
making time available for Scott and Jim to provide this
training for our employees. It is sincerely appreciated.
Sincerely,
T.C�u ter
Branch Operations Manager
Twin Cities Sales Center/3M
TCH:jah
cc: Leroy Kugel
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONT"D
2. Resignation of Fire Chief Childers --Bob Childers, Fire Chief
has formally submitted his resignation to be effective July 5,
1986, from the Eagan Fire Department and the po ition of Fire
Chief, for the City of Eagan. Enclosed on page is a copy
of his resignation letter. (There is additional information
concerning the position of Fire Chief and is'enclosed as a part
of the Informative Memo.)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
of Bob Childers as Fire Chief for the City of Eagan.
3
June 5, 1986
TO: EAGAN CITY
EAGAN FIRE
TOM HEDGES
EAGAN FIRE
COUNCIL
DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE BOARD
DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION
FROM: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF
® I hereby submit my resignation as of July 5, 1986
from the Eagan Fire Department and the position of
Fire Chief for the City of Eagan. The purpose of
my resignation is for retirement after serving
twenty three (23) years as an Eagan Volunteer Fire
Fighter.
T have most certainly enjoyed my association with
the fire department and the city. I fdel I have
personally gained much from my experience.
I deeply appreciate the support I have received
from the members of the fire department and all the
departments of the city. It sure helped me
accomplish my job much easier.
® I wish the fire department well and I will be
available to help when I can.
Respectfully yours,
Bob Childers
BC/ma
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Three
B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. Stop Sign Request, Yorktown Place and Trenton Road --In the
early part of April, Charles Souza of 4248 Trenton Road (.Lot
1, Block 3, Northview Meadows) contacted the Police Department
for a complaint regarding traffic volumes and property damage
to his corner lot at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Trenton
Road. Subsequently, the Police Department reviewed the situation
on April 12 and 13, with Officer Kasat submitting his report
enclosed on page 6� .
On April 15, Councilman Wachter relayed this property owner's
• concern to the Council and it was referred to the Engineering
Division for further investigation.. Enclosed on pageZ is
a copy of the report prepared by the Assistant City Engineer
regarding the request for a three way stop sign at the intersection
of Yorktown Place and Trenton Road. Earlier this year, the
Engineering Division received a similar request for a stop sign
at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. In
this similar situation, this intersection did not meet the warrants
for the installation of a stop sign and the requesting property
owner was so informed by the letter enclosed on page �/, .
Mr. Souza has been informed that this item will be considered
by the Council at the June 17 meeting for final resolution.
It is the staff's recommendation that a three way stop sign not
be installed, but rather yield signs be placed on Trenton Road
at the intersection with Yorktown Place and on Yorktown Place
at the intersection with Braddock Trail. Enclosed on page
is a map showing the relationship of the two intersections be ng
discussed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM': To approve the installation
of three way stop signs or yield signs at the intersections of
Trenton Road/Yorktown Place and Yorktown Place/Braddock Trail.
('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J
M1�
V �
A_
p
i
o
O�
�lN�l�6i✓,y
�YO%,
y'�)d�,S
s!/�y/Yi1 �d`�
�
ti
//"
�Ngp��j
/�»'/1i
lv,'Y s°eS p/ �/N®
>r r
��n7�rlsx�
rr��y>o
u sr is ;)s y
('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J
M1�
V �
A_
p
T
Kre.s cols•
eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r
4 " ' � !4
op
4,0
�,v r
•
i
o
O�
7 ❑
D'
n`
Z
Mm ❑
�
ti
Y
Z
�l
I
�y
f
T
Kre.s cols•
eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r
4 " ' � !4
op
4,0
�,v r
•
7 ❑
D'
n`
Z
Mm ❑
�
ti
Y
Z
T
Kre.s cols•
eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r
4 " ' � !4
op
4,0
�,v r
•
MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COLBERT
FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI
DATE: APRIL 24, 1986
SUBJECT: 3 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF
YORKTOWN PLACE AND TRENTON ROAD
At the April 15, 1986, Council meeting, Coucilman Wachter
informed me of a complaint he received from the owner of Lot 1,
Block 3, of Northview Meadows Addition. The complainant
contacted the Police Department regarding his concerns for the
high traffic volumes associated with the modal homes located just
north of him. In addition, the complainant alleges that vehicles
have been jumping the curb and driving over the corner of his
lot. Chief Berthe had two officers investigate the complaint.
They did not see anyone drive over the complainant's yard,
however, they felt a three-way stop sign would be appropriate at •
the Trenton Road and Yorktown Place intersection. Attached is a
copy of the officer's report.
I disagree with the recommended three-way stop sign to be used as
a speed control. The manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises
specifically warns against using stop signs for controlling speed
limit. Also, I do not believe this intersection would meet with
any of the following warrants found in the manual:
1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where
application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly
hazardous.
2. Street entering a through highway or street.
3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
4. An intersection where a combination of high speed,
restricted view, and serious accident record indicates a
need for control by the STOP sign. 40
Yorktown Place is a street built to normal residential standards.
I would estimate the traffic volumes upon full development of the
area surrounding Yorktown Place to be about 700 trips per day. I
would anticipate the builders of the existing model homes to
convert those into residential units by the end of this year.
Then the traffic will be based on normal residential usage.
In summary, I feel that a three-way stop sign placement at the
Yorktown Place and Trenton Road intersection would be an
inappropriate means of speed limit control. I would be happy to
discuss %�tth%his in more detail with you if you would so desire.
Assistant City Engi er
RMH/]]
cc: Jay Berthe, Police Chief
Ted Wachter, City Councilman
®■
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P - BOX 21199
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
Mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
.1AMES A. SMITH
- MC ELLISON
'
THEODORE WACHTER
March 12, 1986
COUnC° Memms
- .- - -.
THOMAS HEDGES
CIN Adminstf Wo1
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
ON Clerk
KAREN MURPHY
4253 BRADDOCK TRAIL
EAGAN MN 55123
RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL - YORKTOWN PLACE AT BRADDOCK TRAIL
Dear Karen:
I am writing in response to your request for a stop sign at the
intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. The City has
standard conditions which need to be met to warrant stop signs.
These conditions are outlined in a manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration. Our office has looked at this intersection
and was unable to meet any of these conditions to warrant a stop
sign.
Although you expressed an interest in a stop sign, we feel that a
yield sign would be more appropriate.. This would catch the
attention of the drivers without requiring a complete stop in all
cases.
Therefore, if you would like to request placement of a yield sign in
writing to our. office, I think we would have a better chance of
getting a method of traffic control at Yorktown Place and Braddock
Trail.
Sincerely,
ai,d E. Knudsen
Engi eering Technician
CEK/jj
N
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
SEC. r 6� O 7 R / 3 CO' "Y
D N. CARSON I ``, V _
(mr♦ 9 L/:=v L/a CAvOTT COUNT
I Y �Y ' / ®C 1` _
Y. VINN
E.L1 '., � :.i R23 SLPTEVBER,1.11 , a
CN IH SEC 24, T. 27, R.'3
AID :T— _ _ __ _
r FP HI GFN'AY ......r.n .r.-- NO )D n,. ,1.: ,.. , ,Y __ .r.. •. �..
£✓ � ¢ '• .- ,.•
DIF „!LC-�Y ic,;� _ , jDIf REI' gDADIT— CDIIXTT rL TATE "rn'� SID ••��, XIG WAYi
(_EFCP0 Po'F\\ fy+'..'�y`1 a _ ye-•. �C'= f. I.
' ...r. � �/Fi + g �w<��E v JI v r. 'e •. v I .3.r� �' ' 2 Cil: O {i _"�. r
Is
S •2 �¢ Wlrq
1 1 'Q
{ 2 Q ,..•
�, � L •° � .° PL CE - ^9 , IOnKTONN �• '• �, •rY PLACE
��sl=11•n•�.r., UN � E '� • ���,, ,�. L.. '�/ � . � i 1
t E>, F.�a;/ii ADDI!TIN: ,s r =1t,.—SUN
_ .� P�`_. \ ° ••�`_ 5 r� i erre,, ; , v ,I; I L L. ; { , • '� .EISSD
"; � t "r> i I r^xL..�x aacE i .>=� � - .. � -'�'• 'l - I s
� .,rr f �r: � .� y� , r• •I�: ti �� ..V Ei"r�„r�l., s= ,FI ?',
�>• f. f I +,�� _ - err. 4 .�F � •..r. .. " a
° ~ i`�'.r G\alb :� ..., ..' ;ur,.r .,'. ". � .L �•cre �, „�'• . :z'
n .l ��r .i $I :l. o.° .i ••�� r•..'_n *TE LACKYDRI
w r7—
KING----
SECG�D
2 1g
e.DJI TION
�-
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Four
CONSENT AGENDA
There are fourteen ( 14 ) items on
Items requiring one (1) motion
Council wishes to discuss any
those items should be removed
under Additional Items unless
the agenda referred to as Consent
by the City Council. If the City
of the items in further detail,
from the Consent Agenda and placed
the discussion required is brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSES
A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who have been selected' and retained
• as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to
reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references
from other municipalities or their client permit applications
are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
contractor licenses as presented.
/Q
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
JUNE 17, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
1. REGGIE KAJER CONST
2. KEN SMITH'S REMODELING
3. TWOMEY THE CARPENTER
4. J.R. UZZELL BLDRS
HEATING & VENTILATING
1. PREFERRED MECHANICAL SERVICES INC
PLUMBING
1. A & G PLUMBING
2. WILLIAM GADTKE
3. CHEMED CORPORATION
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Five
PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Police Officer --An additional police officer position
was approved for the 1986 budget effective July 1, 1986. It
is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Curtis
Sisco, who is presently a. Community Service Officer with the
Eagan Police Department, be appointed to the new police officer
position. As the Council is aware, Eagan C.S.O. 's have completed
the education and skills requirements necessary for P.O.S.T.
licensure. They have been processed through a rigorous interview
and screening procedure before they are selected as C.S.O.'s
and have spent many months in training in the Eagan Police Depart-
ment.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Curtis Sisco as a Policer Officer, effective July 1, 1986.
Item 2. C.S.O.--If the hiring of Curtis Sisco is approved,
a vacancy will exist for a C.S.O. It is the recommendation
of Chief of Police Berthe that Kenneth Conyers be appointed
to that C.S.O. position. Conyers is P.O.S.T. certified and
has previously served as an officer in the Eagan Police Department.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Kenneth Conyers as a C.S.O. in the Eagan Police Department.
Item 3. Compost Site Monitors --Two positions are available
for the part-time, temporary position of Compost Site Monitor.
These employees would work only on Saturday afternoons and only
® one employee would work any one Saturday. It is, however, neces-
sary to have two Compost Site Monitors in order to insure that
a monitor is available. It is the recommendation of Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein that Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz be
hired to fill these temporary positions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz as temporary compost site
Monitors for the 1986 season.
Item 4. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker --It is the recommenda-
of Superintendent of Utilities and Buildings• Connolly that David
Erickson be hired to fill the one remaining vacant seasonal.
utility maintenance worker position.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of David Erickson as a Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker.
/v
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Six
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/ROBBINS ADDITION
C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition --The staff has received
an application for final plat approval for the Robbins Addition
which is located in the SW Quadrant of 1-494 and T.H.149 as
shown on a copy of the plat enclosed on page All conditions
of
placed on the preliminary plat approval November 17, 1981,
have been complied with and the final plat conforms with the
previous preliminary plat approval concept. All final plat
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff
and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Robbins Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk •
to execute all related documents.
/3
I
VCMRT YAP
rrr ; 7r118,.cr n
00
rJ
DETAIL
rno $CALF)
EXHIBIT it Aa
Ah
ROBINS A®®IiI®N
r r✓1
P`
INTERSTATE
A
OUTLOT ti
7a
w�
j V
we.9iPr'!
{
1
1
•
�I
r ar
QO'
♦
%
�rM P'
3
I
i
/
b
8
\\\
i
c
°Te
Al<.rJK
!A. r. rn •[�
10, b
ti
Ati P
N'
!�
��ilro'
w
EXHIBIT it Aa
Ah
ROBINS A®®IiI®N
r r✓1
P`
INTERSTATE
• ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y
YCar� i,
•tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C.
YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q
.i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1.
494
r..T. rrr w rr
%
// do iu
I
OUTLOT ti
7a
I
N
i
{
1
1
i
I
1
♦
%
�rM P'
3
I
i
/
b
8
\\\
Jl
c
°Te
• ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y
YCar� i,
•tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C.
YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q
.i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1.
494
r..T. rrr w rr
%
e
7a
N
1
{
v
m
P
x
b
8
i
�y►
!�
��ilro'
• d/rj X11/
�r..w �.[trr.rr.arir
0K! <Jt'ITIOddlO w//
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
PROJECT 473/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
D. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob
Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --With the proposed upgrading of Pilot
Knob from I -35E to Apple valley in 1987, a preliminary analysis of
the storm sewer needs indicate that additional trunk storm sewer
improvements and revisions to existing facilities will be required
to handle the increased •run-off generated from this major County
road improvement.. Subsequently, our consulting engineer has pre-
pared a feasibility report addressing the major areas of trunk
storm sewer improvements associated with the County road upgrading.
These involve modifications to the Evergreen Park lateral storm
sewer system, outlets from Berry Patch Park (Mooney Lake) to
Patrick Eagan Park and construction of storm sewer across City -
owned property south of City Hall.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 473 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) and
schedule a public hearing to be held July 15, 1986.
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 1,7, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Eight
AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
E. Amusement Device Renewals --The City Clerk's office has received
applications for local businesses renewing amusement devices::
Attached on. page/ �f is a copy of the list of the amusement
device renewals. Al-1%amusement device machines do meet and satisfy
City Code regulations.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To
ment device renewals as presented.
A6
approve the 1986 amuse -
Name & Address
1986 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
Number of Machines - Locations
Sam Nilva 5 machines - Cedarvale
National Amusement Co.
P.O. Box 16206
Minneapolis, MN 55416
D.V.M. Company over 15 machines
119 State Cedarvale Lanes
St. Paul, MN 55107 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive
3 machines
La Fonda's
3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy
4 machines
Richard's Food & Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
® James Durning 1 machine
4625 Nicols Rd Durnings
Eagan, MN 55122
Harold Steinman
2 machines
3300 Minnehaha Ave. S.
Eagan Steak House
Minneapolis, MN 55403
1448 Yankee Doodle
Rd
Theisen Vending
2 machines
3804 Nicollet Ave. S.
Eagandale Club
Minneapolis, MN 55409
3330 Pilot Knob Rd
2 machines
Al Baker's
3434 Washington Dr
•
James A. Basta
1 machine
Italian Pie Shoppe
Italian Pie Shoppe
1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
1438 Yankee Doodle
Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
Harold Awe Company
3 machines
1372 Scheffer Ave.
Mr. D's Pizza
St. Paul, MN 55116
3904 Beau d'Rue Dr
Advance Carter Co.
2 machines
850 Decatur Ave. N.
Pizza Hut
Minneapolis, MN 55427
3992 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
2 machines
Charkist
1975 Senaca Rd
Gary Starks
over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road
Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121
3125 Dodd Road
1 machine
Piccolo's Pizzeria
4162 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Slicer's Restaurant
2113 Cliff Rd
•
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
SERVICE STATION RENEWALS
F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals --There are ten (10)
service station permits requiring renewal for the period of
July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1987. A list of those service
station permits are enclosed on page All service stations
appear to meet regulations set forth in e City Code,
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve service station
permit renewals as presented.
O
•
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
JUNE.17, 1986 AGENDA
Country 66
3206 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
Eagan 55121
Q Petroleum
4206 Nicols Rd
Eagan 55122
Superamerica
Diffley Rd & Sibley Mem. Hwy.
Eagan 55122
Superamerica
Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan 55122
Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Rd
Eagan 55122
® Eagan Service Center (Union 76)
4195 Nicols Rd
Eagan 55122
Sinclair Station
3946 Cedar
Eagan 55122
Eagan Standard
4205 Nicols Rd
Eagan 55122
Texaco Fuel Stop
3150 Dodd Road
Eagan 55121
Cedar Cliff Amoco
4600 Slater Rd
Eagan 55122
There are ten service station permits which should be renewed for the
period of July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987.
N
I*
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
TRAILER PERMIT'RENEWALS
G. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals --Trailer permit renewals for
1986/19'87 have been processed by the City Clerk's office and
inspected by the Building Inspections Division. The City Council
has previously requested a detailed review of each trailer permit
to determine whether the purpose is consistent with the reasons
that were given for the granting of the actual trailer permit.
Enclosed on pages 7_through _ is a copy of the Chief Building
Inspector's review and a list of trailer permit renewals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the trailer
permit renewals as presented.
CW
Y
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE.PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: JUNE 13, 1986
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS FOR 1986/87
Administrative Intern, Cheryl Johannes, has investigated the current status of
the proposed trailer permit renewals. The status of each permit on record is
the same as when granted. We have received complaints of unsavory conditions
at 670 Lone Oak Road and they have either been rectified or were unfounded.
The permit at 3850 Cornation Drive issued to James Horne was originally for
one year, to terminate June 1985 and in 1985 a renewal was granted for an
additional year. A request for another one-year extension has been received
and awaits Council action.
• If you require further information, please contact me.
DP/j
•
1
f:.
I
,t
II C •
TO: DALE PETERSON
FROM: LIZ WITT
DATE: JUNE 9, 1986
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87.
I have no idea of their current status.
In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special
trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85.
I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit
expired June 1, 1986.
Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv •
approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home
for summer construction help. I have heard some complair
about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home".
When do they disband?
I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if
possible.
f
w,
1
f:.
I
,t
II C •
TO: DALE PETERSON
FROM: LIZ WITT
DATE: JUNE 9, 1986
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87.
I have no idea of their current status.
In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special
trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85.
I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit
expired June 1, 1986.
Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv •
approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home
for summer construction help. I have heard some complair
about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home".
When do they disband?
I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if
possible.
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
1.
Tripp Oil.Co.
permitted
prior to
1970 and
3085 Hwy 13
remain in
office use.
Eagan, MN 55121
2.
Earl Marotzke
permitted
prior to
1970 and
535 Gun Club Road
remains in use as
a family home.
Rosemount, MN 55068
3.
Alwin & Lyle Schultz
permitted
prior to
1970 and
1315 Carriage Hills Drive
remains in
use as
a familyhome.
Eagan, MN 55121
4.
Edmund Schwanz
permitted
in 1980
and remains in
810 Yankee Doodle Rd
use as a residence
for Mr. Schwanz
Eagan, mN 55123
mother.
-S
5.
Levi Heuer
permitted
in 1983
and remains in
550 Diffley RD
use as a residence
for George Meister.
Eagan, MN 55123
®
6:
Dakota Homes
permitted
in 1972
and remains in use
3660 Dodd Road
as a sales
office
for mobile homes.
Eagan, MN 55121
n
LJ
v3
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE/VOTING ACCESSIBILITY
H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility -
Both Federal legislation and Minnesota statutes require that
all polling places located within a municipality used for primary
and general elections be surveyed to determine whether the facility
is accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. If any of
the polling places located within the 14 precincts are not acces-
sible and it is determined after a survey that there are no
other locations that could be used that are accessible to the
handicapped and elderly, it is necessary to appoint a special
advisory committee for the purpose of continuing an effort to
locate a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct
3 for future elections. If Highsite Apartments is approved
• by the Secretary of State's office as the polling location for
Precinct 3 after a report is filed by the Voting Accessibility
Advisory Committee that there are no alternatives, then elections
judges are allow to assist the handicapped or elderly voter
with curbside voting or some other means available during the
election. For additional information on. this item, refer to
a memo prepared by Administrative Assistant Witt describing
the federal polling place accessibility law on page 2ij .
•
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Betty Preston,
Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler as members of the Voting
Accessibility Advisory Committee for the purpose of continuing
all efforts to locate a permanent, accessible polling place
in or near Precinct 3 for future elections.
a�
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
DATE:JUNE 10, 1986
RE: FEDERAL POLLING PEACE ACCESSIBILITY LAW
Federal legislation and Minnesota Statutes require that all polling places
for the 1986 primary and general elections be surveyed to determine whether
they are accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. A survey report is
to be completed for each precinct and the reports are to be filed with the
Secretary of State's office by July 11 1986.
Carolyn and I have completed our survey of Eagan's 14 polling places. All but
precinct 3 (High Site recreation building) are accessible or can be made access-
ible. We conducted a windshield survey of the precinct, which is bounded by
Pilot Knob Road, Lone Oak Road, east city limits and Yankee Doodle Road. Most
of the structures are industrial/warehouse buildings which probably could not
accommodate a public polling place. Other structures have security constraints
which preclude public access.
• We did contact Federal Land Company regarding Waterview Tower. They really were
not interested in a short or long term commitment.. We -looked at the Lemay Lake
Apartments which'are under construction but don't know.if they have an accessible
and otherwise appropriate place for our use. Because the High Site building has
stairs it is not accessible. We have provided a portable voting device to anyone
who requests it, but the federal legislation says this is -riot sufficient.
The Voting Act states that if the City officials determine that no available
place is accessible or can be made accessible, a VotingAccessibility Advisory
Committee must be established: The committee must be made up of at least 50%
representation from individual or organizations representing the elderly and
disabled voters.
Because we do not have an accessible polling place in Precinct 3 and must report
by July 1, I 'request that the City Council appoint Betty Preston >
•Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler to .the Advisory
Committee. The recommended appointees' represent the handicapp, elderly and
Precinct Three"election judges. Following Council.approval, the Advisory Committee
will make a determination of accessibility for a Precinct 3 polling place. If the
committee cannot find an available place, they must file a certified request for
exemption from compliance. The regulations further require that the elderly or
handicapped voter must be provided an alternative means, i.e., curbside voting,
which we have available.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN: Approval of Betty Preston , Corrine Robinson
and Marilyn Lee.ler to the Voting.Accessibility Advisory Committee.
Staff will continue its efforts to locate 'a permanent, accessible polling place
in or near Precinct 3 for future elections.
-5
,0
Agenda Information Memo
June -17, 198,6, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
VACATE UTILITY
IVE PETITION
L. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing
(Deerwood School Addition) --We have received a request to vacate
the utility line easement for the water line through the Deerwood
School Addition due to a change in alignment based on the final
site plan for the Deerwood Elementary School.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
and order a public hearing to consider a vacation of the utility
easement for the Deerwood School Addition.
PROJECT 476, RECEIVE REPORT
ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (HIGHVIEW AVENUE)
J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Highview
Avenue - Streets) --At the May 6 meeting, the Council received
a petition requesting the completion of the eastern 300 feet
of Highview Avenue to City standards. In response to this petition,
the Council authorized the feasibility report which has now been
completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration
of scheduling a public hearing for formal discussion and action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 476' (Highview Avenue - Streets) and order
the public hearing to be held July 15, 1986.
CONTRACT 85-19, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1
K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office
Park 2nd Addition) --Contract 85-19 provided for the installation
of streets and utilities for the construction of Corporate Center
Curve Road to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition.
Prior to completion of the final wear surface, a large "sink
hole" occurred which required corrective repair action. During
the excavation of repair, it was discovered that this settlement
resulted from the previous deposition of construction debris
(concrete curbing, etc.) approximately 15 feet below ground level.
Because this corrective action was not a defect of the City's
contractor, this work was above and beyond the scope of the contract
and should be processed through a change order which would add
$2,607.01 to the base contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve. Change Order
#1 to Contract 85-19 in the amount of $2,607.01.
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986;, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
AND UT -
L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition) --With the proposed
development of the Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the developer
is requesting a reconfiguration of the drainage and utility ease-
ment dedicated for the pond south of Ashbury Road and east of
Birchpond Road to allow the development of single family houses.
With all requirements of the petition being in order, it is
appropriate for the Council to schedule a public hearing for
formal discussion.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
to vacate the drainage and utility easement over a portion of
Blackhawk Glen Addition and schedule the public hearing to be
held on July 15, 1985.
a7
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986., City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, 'TEM ADDITION
M. Final Plat Approval for T.E.M. Addition --We have received
an application for final plat approval for the T.E.M. Addition
located south of Golden Meadow Road as shown by the map enclosed
on pageeAll conditions of the preliminary plat approval
granted by Council on May 21, 1986, have been complied with.
All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed
by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
plat for the T.E.M. Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
M
•
VICINITY MAP
a
-IRE it +
M
Ill%% SEt':rl
TEM M. ADDI TION
MINA" 1110 UII(In EASENENIS MC YIdN 111115:
b;y S I..I ;l ; .ixlx.n;.. ;p;c.lp. .
pio: n;.q 1.1 ilry.. A. p;p 10 I. pl.1.
olpnia. IplAl.x..ptl/oinirq aln.l I�p....xpn
—N—
cp .wrmof ,p A y n. S'cr— is. l...:, N(w.:, i6
up.. o p p.ci,q of xo.rn A e.a•...5 .�n,l.. u . w
lur.
A, pp'.. 51. A,;6 �Rn AN,
I p .s.�n. l ....p
'xl]Irt15-. -1... a p,.A.. pn,
• III .In I. An /ip .—., I— -
SIGMA
'UR
BURYFVIINIB
BHRVIC HO
ew..e+.o p.e
Nxurl�lA.NTin
0
Aaenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Fifteen
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, HAMPTON HEIGHTS ADDITION
N. Final Plat Approval for Hampton Heights Addition --We have
received an application for final plat approval for the Hampton
Heights Addition, located south of Yankee Doodle Road, adjacent
to the Public Works Maintenance Facility as shown by the map
enclosed on page * All conditions of the preliminary plat
approval granted by Council action on May 21, 1985, have been
satisfactorily complied with except for the installation of the
trailway from Yankee Doodle Road to the Blackhawk Glen Addition.
At a special meeting of the. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
on June 11, 1986, that Commission rescinded their previous require-
ment for this trail. Although the development contract agreement
provided wording for compliance with this trailway requirement,
if the Council concurs with the Park Commission's recommendation
to eliminate this requirement, this can be resolved through an
addendum to the contract and an immediate reduction in the financial
guarantee as it relates to the trailway requirement.
All other final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
plat for the Hampton Heights Addition and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
• *Special Note: The map showing the final plat was not available for
inclusion with this packet. The map will be forwarded with. the
Additional Information packet on Monday.
30
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number
of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the May 6, 1986,
City Council meeting a demographic study and request to amend
the off -sale liquor license ordinance to allow for five (5)
licenses,with the new license application to be issued in the
northerly part of the City, was reviewed as presented by the
Federal Land Company. As a part of the deliberation by the
City Council there was some. consideration given to removing any
limit on the number of off -sale licenses allowing the number
of off -sale liquor stores to be controlled by the market place,
similar to all other retail establishments. The following action
was taken: Smith moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to authorize
one additional off -sale liquor license in. the northerly portion
of the City, generally in the Town Centre area, and further that
a public hearing be scheduled for the June 17, 1986, Council
meeting to consider removing the restrictions or revising the
number of off -sale liquor licenses approved by City ordinance,
noting at the time of adoption of the original policy in 1973,
only Cedarvale Shopping Center was in existence; that an application
would be entertained by the City Council for an additional license
in the Town Centre area, and further, to authorize the revision
of the Eagan Ordinance to provide for five off -sale liquor licenses
within the City. "All Councilmembers voted 'yes.'"
J
The City Administrator has asked the Police Department to give
consideration to a proposed regulatory change in removing the
present ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor license. A
response prepared by the Chief of Police is enclosed on page
3Z7 for your review. There are no additional thoughts or •
staff background on this issue.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
ordinance amendment_ that would remove the ceiling or any regulation
on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that could be granted
within the City of Eagan.
3/
M
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
23 Nny 1986
TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
Chill nnella
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
AdmH.,1 .lUPYIn
KENNETH D.ASZMANN
ouml,.�r.Pmn
I have conferred with Captains Geagan and Aszmann about their
thoughts concerning additional liquor licenses within the City of
Eagan.
Our thoughts fall into three categories:
1. Those of a criminal nature, such as selling to minors. We now
try to control this by sending a minor in to purchase liquor
from each of the off sale liquor stores within the city. This
is done at random times during the year with emphasis on
checking each and every liquor establishment so that enforce-
ment is fair and equal. Additional liquor stores would only
take more time and effort as far as the police department is
concerned.
2. The necessary background checks done by this department on
each applicant for licensing. Captain Geagan will submit a
separate memo on this issue.
3. Noncriminal issues, which triggers in each of us our own
personal philosphies, such as, will Eagan appear to have an
awful lot of liquor establishments within the city and thus,
are we encouraging drinking by making it too available?, etc.,
etc.
In summary, the police department, as the enforcement arm of
the city, would not have a serious problem in enforcing the
laws governing the operation of off sale liquor stores.
n�'
i . Berthe
Jk
31/
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Seventeen
PROJECT 475/DANIEL DRIVE
B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets &
Utilities) --On May 21, the City Council received a feasibility
report for the proposed upgrading of Daniel Drive (formerly
South Wescott Hills Drive) necessary for the development of
the Northview Meadows Second Addition south of Northview Elementary
School. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the
feasibility report for the Council's information and reference
during the public hearing. All notices have been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially assessed
property owners informing them of this public hearing. The
consulting engineering will be available to discuss in detail
• all aspects of this proposed project and will be available to
answer any questions of the Council and/or general public.
0
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 475 (Daniel Drive - streets and utilities)
and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans
and specifications.
33
REPORT
ON
DANIEL. DRIVE
0 UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
r
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE No. 49395
eawdu - 9 `ftq weeu
SL Pa"4 M/wweeala
3 `/
Bonestroo, Ros
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612.6364600
May 22, 1986
Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Engineers & Architects
Re: Daniel Drive
Utility 6 Street Improvement
Project No. 475
File No. 49395
Dear Mayor and Council:
uuo G. Runrvrou,. P. E.
RW"" W. Rwrnr, PE.
J CL And"hi, P.E.
8m✓7uN A, LrmG,q. P,E.
Hrrhern E'. Turner, P.E.
lwreo ('. Uh✓rr IlL
Glenn R. CwY. P.E.
Avuh.4. GurJm. It E.
Ihmnm E. N.". II E.
R,, hu,d W. F.,e,, P..,
RUG,/ G. Shurw h,. I'. E.
Murrl/r L..So,.ulu. Ir.E.
IA.nWdG Hu, .,d, VE.
Jay A. 0 ... dmr, V. E.
AIu,Y A. llumun. P.E.
7,d K. IJJ✓: V.F.
Mrrhurl 7'. Ruuurrunrr. It 1.
NUMv/ R. /'Ir//rr4. I'. 1:,
M.'d O. Lm1uw. P E.
/Aurum k', Prrrnun. It E.
Ahchuw C. L'n'h, HR.
Aurrn L. Illlhr, V1.
Jmnr, R. ArWun 1, PF
A'rwmh P. And" nini, Il L.
A'rvh A. HUJurwmi, Pl:.
Mm1 R. Rule, PE.
Rnhrn ('. HurrrY. A.I.A.
7hurrrv/ E. A.,,,, P.E:
I hudn d. Frulvm
I e. M. Pe.0A.
imnun 11. (llvm
Sown AL Ehrrnn
Transmitted herewith is our report for Daniel Drive, Project No. 475. This
report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and street construction
and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
EONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
-7�� A"4 -
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws' of tha StatMinnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
Date: May 22, 1986 Reg. No. 14260
n'
Approved by:
Department of P" lic Works _
Date:
5294d
35` .
F- 1
LJ
0
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main, storm sewer, and street for Daniel Drive. Daniel Drive serves as the
southwesterly boundary of Northview Meadows an existing single family develop-
ment, and the proposed single family development Northview Meadows 2nd Addi-
tion. The property southwesterly of Daniel Drive is unplatted and undeveloped
property presently zoned for commercial and light business use.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for
® the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 8"
PVC sanitary sewer in Daniel Drive to serve Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and
the abutting property to the southwest. The sanitary sewer is a continuation
of that sanitary sewer serving Northview Meadows Addition presently located in
the southerly portion of Daniel Drive formerly known as South Wescott Hills
Drive. It is intended the sanitary sewer will continue westerly as Daniel
Drive continues westerly to serve the adjacent property as it develops.
Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 12" DIP water
main in Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. The 12" water main
will connect to an existing 6" water main at Daniel Drive and Braddock Trail.
The 12" diameter main is required to serve the commercial property located
southwesterly of Daniel Drive. This 12" main will ultimately connect to the
existing trunk mains in Lexington Avenue and Co. Rd. No. 30. Also included is
the proper number of valves and hydrants. This area is located in the high
pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressure of approximate-
ly 74 psi and 68 psi respectively.
Page 1.
5294d _ /
Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing a storm sewer
in Curry Trail and modifications to the existing storm sewer presently serving
the existing Northview Meadows. The storm sewer under this project will be
constructed from the proposed outlet control structure on the south side of
Co. Rd. No. 30 to the south along a Lot line in Northview Meadows 2nd Addition
and will continue within Curry Trail to Daniel Drive as shown on the attached
drawing. This storm sewer will ultimately be extended to the south to provide
an outlet for Pond JP -28 when future development dictates the Pond JP -28 out-
let.
Modifications to the existing storm sewer serving Northview Meadows Addi-
tion is due to the realignment of Daniel Drive and the resulting reconstruc-
tion of .the Rogers Court and Trenton Trail intersections.
In addition, it is proposed that a dry ponding area be created as shown on
the attached drawing adjacent to Co. Rd. No. 30 designated as Pond JP -28A.
Design considerations for the pond are as follows:
Pond
NWL
HWL
Storage
Outflow
Designation
NWL Area I1WL
Area
(ac.ft.)
(cfs)
Pond JP -28A
940 0.1 ac. 951
1.4 ac.
8.6
20
To create Pond JP -28A, it will be necessary to construct an outlet control
structure within the existing 48" RCP culvert beneath Co. Rd. No. 30 to re-
strict the available flow down to 20 cfs. Restricting the flow through this
culvert will help to minimize any downstream drainage and erosion problems
north of Co. Rd. 30. In addition, it will require a smaller downstream storm
sewer pipe than the 42" shown on the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
Street - Street construction proposed herein includes constructing Daniel
Drive to a 9 ton design section 44' wide from about Rogers Court to the west
Page 2.
5294d
37
0
•
edge of the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition. The developer of the Northview
Meadows built the easterly half (22') of South Wescott Hills Road. This road
was to ultimately be upgraded to a 44' wide street when the adjacent .property
developed. The existing portion of South Wescott Hills Road adjacent the pro -
posed Northview Meadows Addition is proposed to be widened as part of this
project to complete the construction of South Wescott Hills Drive and rename
South Wescott Hills Drive to Daniel Drive. To improve traffic circulation. it
is proposed to revise the alignment of Daniel Drive from Braddock Trail south-
erly to a point where Rogers Court and Trenton Trail will connect to Daniel
Drive as shown on the attached drawing. This will discourage the future com-
mercial traffic from using the residential neighborhood streets. Trenton
Trail and Rogers Court will be reconstructed as 32' wide residential streets
in which the existing surface and curbing for old South Wescott Hills, Drive
will be utilized as much as possible.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AREA
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
5294d
CONSTRUCTION AREA
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
NORTHVIEW MEADOWS
Lot 23, Block 1
Lot 37, 38, 44, Block 4
Lot 1, Block 7
Page 3.
3�
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Sanitary Sewer $ 46,920
Water Main 67,500
Storm Sewer 78,650
Street - Trenton Trail 6 Rogers Court 23,440
Daniel Drive 152,530
TOTAL .......................................... $369,040
The total estimated project cost is $369,040 which includes contingencies
and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include
legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re-
port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs.
These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the
City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the
latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing.
SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral sanitary
sewer on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of
Daniel Drive. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed.
WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral water main on
a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel
Drive. Trunk area water main was previously assessed.
STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral storm sewer
on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of
Daniel Drive. Trunk area storm sewer for this area has not been assessed and
it is not proposed to be assessed until the unplatted parcels either develop
Page 4.
5294d
or a major trunk storm sewer project for this area is required. Northview
Meadows 2nd Addition will be assessed their trunk area storm sewer obligation
as part of the development agreement between the City and the developer.
STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street on a front foot
basis to the abutting property. It is proposed to assess all lots within the
Northview Meadows 2nd Addition equally on a per lot basis their proportionate
share of the residential equivalent for that portion of Daniel Drive which
abuts that subdivision. The remaining cost of Daniel Drive will be assessed
entirely to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. The
® total cost of reconstructing the Trenton Trail and Rogers Court extension to
Daniel Drive will also be assessed entirely to the unplatted property located
southwesterly of the Trenton Trail extension.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows:
A. SANITARY SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
B. WATER MAIN
® Lateral
Lateral Assessment
C. STORM SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
D. STREET
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
Project
Cost
$ 46,920
$ 46,920
$ 67,500
$ 67,500
$ 78,650
$ 78,650
$175,970
$175,970
There are no trunk funds required for this project.
Page 5.
5294d
0
Revenue Balance
$ 46,920
$ 46,920 - 0 -
$ 67,500
$ 67,500 - 0 -
$ 78,650
$ 78,650 - 0 -
$175,970
$175,970 - 0 -
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
open Bids/Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
Page 6.
5294d
T'
May 21, 1986
June 17, 1986
June 17, 1986
July 15, 1986
Fall, 1986
Summer, 1987
Springy 1988
E
•
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROSECT NO. 475
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920
Page 7.
5294d
�v
A. SANITARY SEWER
1,270
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 15'-25'dp. in pl. @ $20.00/l.f.
$25,400
110
Lin.ft.
6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft.
1,100
3
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
2,700
®
30
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
1,800
2
Each
8"x 6" wye branch @ $50.00/each
100
15
Lin.ft.
6" PVC riser pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft.
150
2
Each
Connect 8" PVC to existing 8" PVC @ $500.00/each
1,000
100
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
1,000
1,120
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,120
Total
$34,370
+5% Contingencies
1,720
$36,090
®
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
10,830
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920
Page 7.
5294d
�v
B. WATER MAIN
1,620
Lin.ft.
12" DIP Water wain @ $20.00/lin.ft.
$32,400
180
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Water main @ $12.00/lin.ft.
2,160
2
Each
hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
2,000
2
Each
12" Butterfly valve 5 box @ $800.00/each
1,600
5
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $400.00/each
2,000
5,100
Lbs.
Fittings in place @ $1.50/lb.
7,050
2
Each
Connect 12" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each
500
1
Each
Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each
500
1,240
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,240
Total
$49,450
+5% Contingencies
2,470
$51,920
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
15,580
TOTAL WATER MAIN ....................................
$67,500
5294d
Page 8.
P
•
Page 9.
5294d
0T
C. STORM SEWER
150
Lin.ft.
30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @$38.00/lin.ft.
$ 5,700
650
Lin.ft.
18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
18,200
560
Lin.ft.
15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
13,440
70
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft.
1,400
5
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each
5,500
2
Each
Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
1,800
7
Each
Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each
5,600
LUMP
SUM
Construct outlet control structure in existing 48"
®
RCP @ Co. Rd. No. 30 @ $3,000.00/L.S.
3,000
2
Each
Reconstruct existing CB as MH @ $500.00/each
1,000
1
Each
Connect to existing storm sewer @ $500.00/each
500
4
Cu.yds.
Rock rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd.
200
1,280
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,280
Total
$57,620
+5% Contingencies
2,880
$60,500
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
18,150
TOTAL STORM SEWER ...................................
$78,650
Page 9.
5294d
0T
D. STREET
a.
Trenton
Trail Extended 6 Rogers Court
1,400
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd.
$ 1,400
550
Sq.yds.
Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd.
1,100
90
Lin.ft.
Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft.
270
200
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
600
100
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
600
500
Ton
Class 5 100% crushed aggregate base @ $7.50/ton
3,750
110
Ton
2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton
1,320
110
Ton
2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton
1,430
12
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton
2,160
60
Ton
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal.
90
600
Lin.ft.
8618 Concrete curb and gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft.
3,300
5
Each
Adjust MH, CB 6 GV box @ $150.00/each
750
0.4
Acre
Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000/ac.
400
Total
$17,170
+5G Contingencies
860
•
$18,030
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
5,410
TOTAL..............................................
$23,440
Page 10.
5294d 05
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200
TOTAL............................................. $152,530
Page 11.
5294d A
b.
Daniel Drive
2,000
Cu.yds.
Common excavation @ $2.50/cu.yd.
$ 5,000
8,000
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd.
8,000
600
Sq.yds.
Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd.
1,200
240
Lin.ft.
Remove concrete curb S gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft.
720
400
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
1,200
200
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
1,200
6,000
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton
30,000
1,300
Ton
2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton
15,600
650
Ton
2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton
8,450
110
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton
19,800
400
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal.
600
3,050
Lin.ft.
B618 concrete curb 6 gutter @ $5.50/lin.ft.
16,775
12
Each
Adjust MH, CB b GV box @ $150.00/each
1,800
1.4
Acre
Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac.
1,400
Total
$111,745
+5% Contingencies
5,585
®
$117,330
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200
TOTAL............................................. $152,530
Page 11.
5294d A
A. SANITARY SEWER
Parcel
Description
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
B. WATER MAIN
NE 1/4. SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
C. STORM SEWER
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
Wp**W9•J
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 475
Assessable
Footage
100
720
160
980
520
720
160
150
1,550
520
720
160
530
1,930
Page 12.
Y/
Rate/F.F.
$47.88
47.88
47.88
$43.55
43.55
43.55
43.55
$40.75
40.75
40.75
40.75
Total
Assessment
$ 4,788
34,472
7,660
$46;920
$22,645
31,355
6,968
6,532
$67,500
$21,191
29,341
6,520
21,598
$78,650
1-74
0
D. STREET
a.) Trenton Trail Extended 5 Ro¢er's Court
Parcel
Assessable
Total
Description
Footage
Rate/F.F.
Assessment
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 013-05
420
$55.81
$23,440
420
$23,440
b.) Daniel Drive
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
57.0
$80.85
$ 42,043
Parcel 013-02
720
80.85
58,213
Parcel 010-03
160
80.85
12,936
Parcel 013-05
150
80.85
12,128
Northview Meadows 2nd Addition
1,130
24.08(l)
27,210
2,680
$152,530
(1) Assessment rate equals residential equivalent (32') from the Trunk as-
sessment Rates Utilities and Streets, Eagan, Minnesota 1986 and does not
include costs associated with grading.
5294d
Page 13.
Ve
SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 375
Parcel Sanitary Water
Description Sewer Main
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01 $ 4,788
Parcel 013-02 34,472
Parcel 010-03 7,660
Parcel 013-05
Northview Meadows 2nd Addition
Lots 1-24, Block 1 &
Lots 1-14, Block 2
$22,645
31,355
6,968
6,532
Storm
Sewer
$21,191
29,341
6,520
21,598
$46,920 $67,500 $78,650
Page 14.
5294d
Street
$42,043
58,213
12,936
35,568
Total
Assessment
$ 90,667
153,381
34,084
63,698
27,210 27,210
$175,970 $369,040
1]
0
•
U
010-76
010.03
DIFFLEY ROAD
010-75
010.76
(COUNTY ROAD No. 30)
s
7 • � r
•
.O F( R H Ell
• (` 1x O \
x • n w .e
n v
_
, TR IL
1 • n q
/ D4N/E' r O Zn 1i n Q ie ~ j
IY
U i
PROPOSED
oq xx 1. m
8" SANITARY == e i
SEWER �o13-o2 i0
eq
s
010.04
0 100 200 300
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
OPOSED N
SANITARY t
.WER
EXISTING
SANITARY
SEWER "
u n
n •
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Date'. MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 1
Comm. 49396
010.78 010.77 1 010-75
DIFFLEY ROAD
I(COUNTY ROADI No. 30) 16
tY• � v
R H E
.. •O ,o e • r o \ r
PL • \ oMADOki
O
a a n ,a ie i u
1
_ x •�rj TR IL 'i u
u
YOR'KT WN
•
W 4 io • Y
U m u
u a, u
v z
PROPOSED o x• I Ei r
Y
1211 WATER MAIN
,v • J 10
I Q I
013-02 a zv /
010-03
16 _ ex
xx
• H
POn8
w-ze
NYL. 959.0
HWL, 969
I
®s
010-09
D 100 200 300
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WATER MAIN
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN. MINNESOTA
n
ooi n
x Oj O ,• eo
012-01 v
EXISTING` `-�A
WATER MAIN C'
' O
\ a
1
00-05 p ��
H n
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
A ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul Minn
Date: MAY, loos FIG. No. 2
Comm. 49395
010-0e 010-77
OIo-75
OUTLET
CONTROL
STRUCTURE
ol0-16
DIFF�EY ROAD
(COUNTY ROADFNO301
I—EXISTING 48 RCP
I
.0
PROPOSED ����— l
POND JP-28A
NWL°940.0 HWL•951.0 , � • Y ,
x,
STORAGE ° 8.6 Acre-Feet
�
R H E
00 IB 'o
PL
• • x • '• ,•
° mM DWS
'
• 9i
u =•
O
:
,
, • u
w .e w w V u
• , flirj
n
TR IL
�YORKT WNL PL.
11 19
PROPOSED \\
o
STORM SEWER \\
'Fi r'
i\
QR .° ii • , i• W
xa14Q
\ 015-02
xo
010-03
24
FUTURE
STORM SEWER
u a ,
vor.o
jv.ze
DD/T/
NWL. 956.0
l O Q ,• ,o
HW L . 969!
012.01 .•
EXISTING
__
STORM '
•Poe " {"
' PROPOSED
SEWER c�
STORM SEWER
5
i
®,.
u
u \\•
PONO
JP 50 ///
a• SR
••
MW1. 964.0
HWL, 9TI.T
a• .( N
H
REMOVE to
Ex. CB 9 ,
BUILD MH i
CONSTRUCT CB
OVER EK. PIPE 9
se
,x
010-04
013-05 o
PROPOSED
0 100 200 300
vm�
w u
STORM SEWER
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
,• '•
DANIEL DRIVE
BONESTROO• ROSENE, ANDERLIK
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
STORM SEWER
St. Paul, Minn.
PROJECT No. 475
Date:
MAY, 198s FIG. No. :3]
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Comm. 49395
010.19
010-05
010-n
DIFFLEY ROAD
r • ,
• E�
N
1,
5) Oj i,
� � 10 �x x° • Y w
� U i• u R
u xl r � LL
•F/ T` 5
O xx I' -I Y
i, I io
x] , 1• Q
013-02 ,° I
It
x. n
u
vono
PROPOSE
�P.29 STREET i,' ' oDiri
MW L. 99E.0 IPAPROVE ENTQQ - ' O O 1•
nwl 04Y.4 / b(2-01
44� F -F ., RE
�`� ` ••gyp Ct4.
EXISTING STREET TO ;
BE REMOVE 4
0 ,
„
0q 32'F -F
a
010.04
0 100 200 300
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREETS
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
010-75
010-i6
(COUNTY ROAD No. 30)
,
1
EXISTING STREET TO °
BE REMOVED 1x
015 -05 u
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul. Minn.
Date: MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 4
Comm. 49395
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eighteen
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 458
C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458 (Eagandale Center
Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) --With the discovery of the inad-
vertent ommissions of mailed notifications for the original public
hearing held on January 21, 1986 for this project, it is inap-
propriate to continue with the proposed final assessments until
such time that the initial public hearing, process can be properly
completed. Subsequently, the City Council set a new public hearing
to consider the merits of this project to be heard on July 1,
1986. If at the conclusion of that public hearing the project
is approved, it would be appropriate to then consider the proposed
• final assessments for Project 458.
L J
Enclosed on pages Js andis a copy of the letter that
was sent by registered mail o all affected property owners,
informing them of this revised hearing process for both the original
public hearing and the proposed final assessment hearing. Based
on this action and information that has been forwarded, staff
is recommending that the Council close the public hearing and
not take any action regarding this assessment role until the
public hearing process can be completed and fully compliedwith.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
for final assessments for Project 458 (Eagandale Center Industrial
Park - Storm Sewer-).
617"
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE (612)454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
June 10, 1986 MC.EUUSON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
MAS
He: Project 458, Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sever c� ;aGoB
NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING DATE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Ciry Clem
Dear Property Owner:
As a result of ongoing analysis relating to the continued growth of our
community, and in particular, development within the Eagandale Center
Industrial Park, the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department
determined that there may be a need for additional storm sewer facilities
within this Industrial Park to handle the additional development. On August
6, 1985, the Council authorized the preparation of a preliminary feasibility
report to.further evaluate these needs. On November 19, the Council received
the completed feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing to be held
on January 21, 1986, to discuss the results of this report with all the
affected property owners who would be benefitted by these proposed
improvements and correspondingly assessed for its related costs. A copy of
this report is enclosed for your information.
It was recently discovered that several property owners were inadvertently
omitted from the notification process of that January 21 public hearing.
Because of the City Council and staff's desire to ensure that all property
owners within the benefitted drainage district are provided every opportunity
to discuss this proposed improvement and the related assessments prior to
formal action ordering the related storm sewer construction, a new public
hearing date has been scheduled.
Recently, you should .have received a notice of a final assessment hearing for
the June 17 City Council meeting relating to this project. Due to the City's
discovery of the inadvertent omission of previous notification regarding the
original public hearing, the City has rescheduled both the public hearing to
consider the installation of this project and the related final assessment
hearing to July 1, 1986. Enclosed with this letter are two Notices of Hearing
which supersede any notices that you may have received at an earlier time
regarding Project 458. These notices are summarized as follows:
1. A Notice of Public Hearing scheduled for July 1, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.,
at the Eagan Municipal Center, at which time the City Council will
discuss the merits of the proposed project and determine whether or
not this project should be constructed.
2. A Notice of Assessment Hearing also scheduled for July 1, 1986, at
7:00 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, which will follow the
above -referenced initial public hearing. If the project is approved
as a result of the public hearing, the City Council will then
determine whether the assessments to finance this project should be
adopted as proposed. �5
THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
June 10, 1986
Page 2
Unless the Council can be assured that this project will be financed without
objections to special assessments from the property within the drainage
district, it is questionable whether this project will be improved for
construction. If this project is not approved, the City will have to consider
placing a moratorium on all future development within this drainage district
until such time that adequate drainage facilities can be provided. If both
the public and final assessment hearing are concluded without any written
objections being submitted, the Council will consider awarding the contract
which would allow construction to begin by the middle of July.
In order to provide more detailed information, I would like to schedule an
informal informational meeting to be held at 1:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall on
Tuesday, June 24, 1986. Hopefully, all your questions and concerns can be
adequately addressed at that meeting and any unresolved issues can be
discussed at the formal hearings on July 1. •
IN SUMMARY, ALL PREVIOUS NOTICES REGARDING PROJECT 458 SHOULD BE DISREGARDED
AND THE SCHEDULE THAT IS PROVIDED BY THE ENCLOSED NOTICES AND DISCUSSED HEREIN
SHOULD NOW CONTROL.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns you may
have regarding this letter or the upcoming meetings.
Sincerely
'T o.as A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney
Mark Hanson, Consulting Design Engineer
Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk
Enclosure
r
5�
ALSCOR INV JNT VENTURE
C/O OPUS CORP
BOX 150
MPLS MN 55440
NW MUTUAL LIFE INS CO
720 E WISCONSIN AVE
MILWAUKEE WI 53200
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO INC
2855 EAGANDALE BLVD
*AN MN 55121
ALSCOR INV
800 OPUS CTR
9900 BREN RD E
MINNETONKA MN 55343
AM FRUIT & PRODUCE CO
4 EAGANDALE BLVD
PAUL MN 55121
CHICAGO TUBE & IRON CO MN
2940 EAGANDALE RD
ST PAUL MN 55121
TERRENCE M & DENNIS
STEVENS
2935 SERVICE RD W
EAGAN MN 55121
i
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nineteen
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 471
D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 471, West Service Drive
(Storm Sewer) ---In response to a petition and waiver of hearing
submitted by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance (owners of affected
lots), the Council authorized a feasibility and detailed plan
preparation for the lateral extension of the storm sewer facilities.
along the West Service Drive towards I -35E. Due to the fact
that this project is not feasible unless Project 458, as previously
discussed, is approved', it would be inappropriate to adopt the
final assessment roll prior to the conclusion of the public hearing
process for Project 45'8. Also, with the public hearing process
being properly compliedwith regarding this project, a continuation
of this final assessment hearing to the July 1 meeting would
be appropriate..
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public
hearing for Project 471 (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer) until
July 1, 1986.
M
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
PROJECT 444R/HOLLAND LAKE
E. Public Hearing for Project 444R (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm
Sewer Outlet) --On May 21, the Council received the revised feasi-
bility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled the
public hearing to be held on June 17. Enclosed on pages
through oD is a copy of this report for the Council's review
reference during this public hearing process. All property owners
proposed to be assessed by this project have been noticed and
informed of this public hearing. Representatives of the County
Park Department will also be in attendance regarding their relation-
ship to this project.
Several meetings have been held with the property owners in the
Lakewood Hills Addition regarding permission to perform preliminary •
survey work in anticipation of this project progression. In
addition, on Wednesday evening, June 11, a neighborhood meeting
was held at which time our consulting engineer reviewed this
proposed project with the affected property owners. Our consultant
will be available to further discuss and answer any questions
relating to this project that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 444R (Holland Lake, - Trunk Storm Sewer
Outlet) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed
plans and specifications.
•
_6�
REPORT
ON
HOLLAND LAKE AREA
® TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT No. 4448
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1955
FILE No. 49355
/3o aa, Rte, f4mJ44" & 4&"c&-tes, Sow.
94 Pa"4 Mow a&
to
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612636.4600
May 14, 1986
Honorable Mayor 6 Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Engineers & Architects
Re: Holland Lake Area
Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements
Project No. 444R
Our File No. 49355
Dear Mayor and Council:
On. G, tlunauau, PE
kuhrr, W. Nwrnr. PE.
J -,,h C. Andrlhk. P.E.
BraJJwd A. LrmArr,, P.E.
R,,hurd E. Turn,, P E,
Jau'e+C. Ohm. P.E.
Glenn R. C.A. P.E.
Ari,S A. GurJun. Y.C.
Thumm E. Nuyn. P.C.
Rahard W. h'werr. P.E.
Raker, G. S9unirhl, Y.E.
At.,. L. S.,Mw. P.E.
Cbnald C. B.,.,dl. P.E.
Jerry A. B ... dan, P.E.
Murk A. Hawun. P.E.
T,d A'. h,ld. P. E.
M,hA d7 Nuunnunn. P.E.
Ru Mal N, PJryl,ln ISE.
tkrv,d G. LmAwa, P.E.
Th.. W. Pn,+an, P.E
Mahal C. L,n,h, PE
A'urrn L. Willi+, P.E.
Jaron R. Mulund, P.E.
A'rnne,h P. Andenun, P.E.
A'n,h A. tlurhnwnn, P.E.
Murk N. Rul/+, Y.E.
R.b ,, C. R.,k, A.I.A.
Thwnu+E. A.,m, P.E.
SmR L. Yaan,. P.E.
Charly A. ErirA,ua
Lru Al. Pu.rhky
Iludm At oh.
SuAon M. EGdin
Transmitted herewith is our report for Holland Lake Area Project No. 444R trunk
storm sewer improvements.
This report discusses trunk storm sewer improvements in the Holland Lake area
and presents cost estimates and also included is a preliminary assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws
✓fof Oe StateofMinnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
Date/e: �MMaay 14, 1986 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by: r � 4";t ���lV/
Department of Public Works"
Date: 6—
5153d 61
30 Year
Anniversaryr
r1
LJ
r
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer in the
southeastern portion of the City in the vicinity of Holland Lake. The project
proposes, to construct storm sewer outlets for Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69,
LP -37, and LP -51 as designated in the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. An
alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm sewer out-
let for Pond LP -36. These ponds are presently land locked and are receiving
storm water runoff from the existing developments adjacent to Wilderness Run
Road (Wedgewood Addition, Sheffield Addition, Oakwood Heights, and Fawn
Ridge). In addition, the lift station to control Schwanz Lake (Pond LP -32)
an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut-
ting Schwanz Lake.
The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and
LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support-
ing residential homes.
which is pumped
ultimately
to Pond LP -61 has been turned off because of the
standpoint and can
best be carried out as one
contract. The project slightly
modifies the 1984
present lack of
storage in
Pond LP -61. !•_s a result, Schwanz Lake hasrisento
an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut-
ting Schwanz Lake.
The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and
LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support-
ing residential homes.
would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff
through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota
County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve,
maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes
through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There-
fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in -
Page 1.
5153d 6-2,-
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project
is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and can
best be carried out as one
contract. The project slightly
modifies the 1984
Comprehensive Storm Sewer
Plan. This Comprehensive Plan
would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff
through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota
County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve,
maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes
through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There-
fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in -
Page 1.
5153d 6-2,-
corporate any portion of their internal storm water management into our trunk
system at some future time provided it pays its trunk area trunk sewer assess-
ment for that area which would benefit from the City's storm sewer system.
However, because this storm sewer project will not be designed for excess ca-
pacity to include future Dakota County Park drainage, it would only be permit-
ted to drain into the storm sewer system during off peak dry periods when the
City's storm sewer system is not being utilized for its own needs. Revision
from the Comprehensive Plan therefore include the following:
1) The gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond LP -34 will be directed to Pond
LP -46 instead of Pond LP -35.
2) Ponds LP -35 and LP -36 will not have the availability of a gravity outlet 0
due to elevation constraints. Therefore, the outlet for this area re-
quires a lift station and force main located in the northwest corner of
Pond LP -36 discharging into the gravity line between Pond LP -46 to LP -37
which is proposed as an alternate to this feasibility report.
3) The gravity storm sewer from Pond LP -46 will be directed to Pond LP -37 in
lieu of the proposed east -west storm sewer along Cliff Road.
4) Dakota County Park runoff is not included in the capacity designs of City
of Eagan storm sewer system. 0
DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer
in the Holland Lake area. It is proposed to construct a gravity storm sewer
from Pond LP -34 (located immediately south of Pond LP -61) to Pond LP -46
through Lakewood Hills Addition as shown on the attached drawing. A short
gravity line will also be constructed to the north from Pond LP -34 to Pond
LP -61 to control the elevation and storage within Pond LP -61. It is also pro-
posed that a gravity storm sewer line be constructed from Pond LP -46 to Pond
LP -37 to Pond LP -51 as shown on the attached drawing,
5153d
Page 2.
�3
Pond LP -51 will be controlled by a lift station pumping through a force
main constructed westerly along Cliff Road discharging into a gravity storm
sewer at Ches Mar Drive. The gravity storm sewer from Che.s Mar Drive will
then be constructed westerly along Cliff Road and discharge into the existing
storm sewer located within the ravine in the well site area. It is further
proposed to complete the storm sewer within the well site as shown on the at-
tached drawing. This includes constructing a gravity storm sewer within the
westerly ravine extended southerly to.the existing 60" diameter culvert under
Cliff Road near Pilot Knob Road.
® Included in Table A is a listing of those ponds which are proposed to have
outlets constructed as part of this project and the specific design considera-
tions regarding each pond. As noted in this Table, 3 ponds are protected wet-
lands controlled by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Therefore, a
permit will be required from the DNR prior to constructing the outlet for
these ponds.
An alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm
sewer outlet for Pond LP -36. The gravity outlet for Pond LP -46 to LP -37 will
® be constructed adjacent to Pond LP -36 at an elevation of approximately 879.
However, the normal water elevation as proposed in the Comprehensive Storm
Sewer Plan for Pond LP -36 is 862.0. Therefore, a small lift station and force
main is required which will discharge into the gravity storm sewer between
Pond LP -46 and LP -37. Presently, McDonough Lake (Pond LP -45) located in
Dakota County Park south of Cliff Road does outlet into the drainage area
tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. Therefore, extremely high water elevations
have resulted in Pond LP -35 and LP -36. However, because Dakota County Park
has indicated they will ultimately contain their own storm water runoff within
the park, design considerations for the lift station for Pond LP -36 includes
Pi 3.
5153d b�7/"
TABLE A
POND DATA
Page 4.
5153d ® 0
Comp.
i
Comp.
Existing
Comp.
Comp.
Plan
Proposed
Plan
Proposed
Pond
Level
DNR
Plan
Proposed
Plan
Proposed
Storage
Storage
Outflow
Outflow
No.
5/66
NOHW
NTATL
NWL
HWL
HVL
(Ac -Ft) -
(Ac -Ft)
(cfs)
cfs)-
Pond
LP -34
885.6
NA
879.0
882.7
888.5
890
20.3
16.7
6.0
5.19
Pond
LP -35
872.7
NA
870.5
870.5
880.0
873.0
22.6
2.5
11.1
0.5
Pond
LP -36
867.5
NA
862.0
862.0
864.5
864.5
5.5
5.5
0
0.5
Pond
LP -37
881.5
879.6
878.3
878.3
880.6
882.8
8.6
18.2
1.0
* 5.97
Pond
LP -46
883.3
879.4
879.2
879.2
881.5
884.0
17.8
39.9
1.0
* 5.24
Uk
Pond
LP -51
867.7
NA
865.0
867
878.5
880
12.8
17.0
6.0
7.0
Pond
LP -61
885.3
884.8
884.4
884.4
888.5
890.0
36.4
52.5
6.0
5.19
Page 4.
5153d ® 0
only the drainage area tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. In addition to the
lift station and force main construction, a gravity storm sewer draining the
low area north of Pond LP -35 to Pond LP -35 and an access road to serve the
lift station will be required.
EASEMENTS: Easements
required for this
project are as follows:
A.) BASE PROJECT
Parcel
Permanent
Temporary
Description
Owner
(Acre)
(Acre)
SE 1/4, SECTION 26
LAKEWOOD HILLS
South Part Lot 4
Russell Agrimson
0.05
0.12
Lot 10
Russell Agrimson
0.05
0.12
Lot 11
Lloyd Wills
0.04
0.16
Lot 13
Gustav Degler
0.07
0.20
Lot 14
Russell Agrimson
0.05
0.16
Outlot A
Samuel Rockwood
0.01
0.02
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Lot 1 (013-00)
Samuel Rockwood
0.14
0.35
Lot 5 (055-00)
Tom Steinmuller
0.25
1.1
SW 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 010-56 Paul Johnson 0.09 0.25
Parcel 014-55 Linda Jones 0.09 0.25
Parcel 020-53 Albert Carlson 1.0 --
1.84 2.73
B.) ALTERNATE PROJECT
SE 1/4, SECTION 26
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Lot 14 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12
Lot 15 (S. 250') Robert Ferguson 0.035 0.10
Lot 15 (N. 250') Helen Undis 0.035 0.10
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Part of Lot 5 (051-00) Sally Beauchemin 0.10
0.22
0_20
0.52
Assuming a cost of $7,000/acre for permanent easement and $2„000/acre for
temporary easement, it is estimated the total cost for easement acquisition is
$18,340 for the base project while for the alternate is $2,060.
Page 5.
5153d
M
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
SWC SECTION 25
Parcel 014-50
Parcel 014-51
SES SECTION .26
Parcel 018-75
Parcel 019-75
Parcel 020-75
Parcel 021-75
Parcel 022-75
Parcel 021-77
Parcel 030-77
ASSESSMENT
AND CONSTRUCTION
AREA
SA SECTION 26
WILDERNESS
RETREAT
Parcel
010-51
Lot 1 (013-00)
Parcel
020-51
Part Lot 5
(055-00)
Parcel
011-52
Part Lot 5
(052-00)
Parcel
010-53
Part Lot 5
(051-00)
Parcel
020-53
Parcel
010-54
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Parcel
013-55
Lot 1-20
Parcel 014-55
Parcel 010-56 OAK POND HILLS
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1
Lots 1 & 2, Block 2
OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION
Lot 1-4, Block 1
Lot 1-2, Block 2
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. The total estimated project cost for the base proj-
ect is $763,850 while the alternate, if included, is an additional $72,450.
Each of these cost estimates includes contingencies and all related overhead.
Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, adminis-
tration, and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at
the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess-
ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef-
fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a
period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The
Page 6.
5153d 47
I*
interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final
assessment hearing.
Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as-
sessments. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those
areas proposed to be assessed as part of the base project and the alternate
project. In the event the alternate project is not approved, those properties
proposed to be assessed as part of the alternate will not be assessed. All
property located north of Cliff Road is either existing residential or poten-
tial future residential property. Therefore, these areas are proposed to be
assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area
storm sewer. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs.
As previously indicated, Dakota County Park is not included as part of
this project. However, in the future if they elect to be included they would
be assessed for that area which would benefit from the Eagan storm sewer sys-
tem. The area to be assessed would be assessed in accordance with the City
policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer to regional parks.
TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are
® as follows:
TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER
Residential $0.050/sq.ft.
Homesteaded Large Lots
Page 7.
5153d 4f
$0.050/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft.
of each acre)
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows:
Trunk Storm Sewer
Easement
Project Cost
Base Alternate
$763,850 $72,450
18,340 2,060
Revenue Balance
Base Alternate Base Alternate
Trunk Area Assmts. $172,525 $212213
TOTAL $782,190 $74,510 $172,525 $21,213 -$609,665 -$53,297
It is anticipated -$609,665 will be required from the trunk storm sewer
fund for the base project while the alternate project is is estimated $53,297
will be required. It should be noted, however, if Dakota County Park elects
to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system sometime in the future, t
their assessment would be used to help defer the deficit presented herein. In
addition, it should be noted many of the new developments upstream have previ-
ously been assessed for trunk area storm sewer for future trunk improvements j
such as this project. Therefore, those surplus assessments will be used to
offset the deficit presented herein, a
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Acquire Easements
Approve plans and Specifications
Receive Bids
Award Contract
Construction Completion
Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
Page 8.
5153d 0
May 20, 1986
June 17, 1986
Summer, 1986
August, 1986
September, 1986
September, 1986
Spring, 1987
Summer, 1987
May, 1988
5153d
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
HOLLAND LAKE AREA
'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS
PROJECT NO. 444
30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
BASE PROJECT
.24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
400
Lin.ft.
94,000
610
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
2,350
Lin.ft.
158,100
100
Lin.ft.
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
550
Lin.ft.
3,600
5,270
Lin.ft.
®
3,000
12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each
1,200
80
Lin.ft.
Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S.
14
Each
1,000
60
Lin.ft.
Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton
LUMP
SUM
4,000
6
Each
Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft.
3
Each
1,500
4,400
Cu.yds.
Total
LUMP
SUM
29,100
2
Each
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
1
Each
$763,850
600
Ton
•
400
Cu.yds.
15
Acres
800
Lin.ft.
500
Sq.yds.
9,280
Lin.ft.
5153d
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
HOLLAND LAKE AREA
'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS
PROJECT NO. 444
30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
24,000
.24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
18,300
18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft.
94,000
15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
2,400
12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
24,200
18" DIP Force main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
158,100
Jack or auger 18" DIP Force main @ $135.00/lin.ft.
10,800
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
12,600
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
3,600
Submersible lift sta. (Pond LP -51) @ $170,000/L.S.
170,000
18" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each
3,000
12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each
1,200
Pond excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd.
13,200
Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S.
8,000
Connect 24" RCP to existing MH & RCP @ $500.00/each
1,000
Connect 30" RCP to existing culvert @ $2,000.00/ea.
2,000
Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton
4,200
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
4,000
Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac.
15,000
Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft.
1,600
Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd.
1,500
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
9,280
Total
$581,980
+5% Contingencies
29,100
$611,080
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
152,770
TOTAL .............................................
$763,850
Page 9.
70
ALTERNATE - POND LP -36 'OUTLET
300
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sewer @ $32.00/lin.ft.
50
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Force main @ $12.00/lin.ft.
1
Each
Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each
LUMP
SUM
Submersible lift station Pond LP -36 @ $30,000.00/L.S.
LUMP
SUM -
Access road @ $10,000.00/L.S.
LUMP
SUM
Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S.
1.0
Acre
Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Acre
Total
+5% Contingencies
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
TOTAL ALTERNATE ....................................
Page 10.
5153d
$ 9,600
600
1,000
30,000
10,000
3,000
1.000
$55,200
2,760
$57,960
14.490
$72,450
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
HOLLAND LAKE AREA OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 444
SA SECTION 26
Parcel
010-51
261,360
Total
193,090
Assessable
9,655
Parcel
Future R/W (20%)
Area
Credit
Area
Assessment
Total
94,500
Description
40,380
(sq.ft.)
(Sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate
Assessment
Pond (20,000)
SW%'SECTION 25
$0.050/s.f.
10,278
Future R'/W (20%)
Parcel
014-50
1,584,000
Pond (64,000)
1,216,000
$0.050/s.f.
$ 60,800
66,000
$0.050/s.f.
3,300
Future R/W (20%)
Parcel
014-51
176,000
Pond (74,000)
102,000
$0.050/s.f.
5,100
SE% SECTION 26
Parcel
018-75
1,050
---
1,050
$0.050/s.f.
53
Parcel
019-75
2,475
---
2,475
$0.050/s.f.
124
Parcel
020-75
12,000
---
12,000
$0.050/s.f.
600
Parcel
021-75
3,600
---
3,600
$0.050/,s.f.
180
Parcel
022-75
3,400
---
3,400
$0.050/s.f.
170
Parcel
021-77
123,000
Pond (37,000)
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
1,650
Large Lot
Parcel
030-77
52,000
Large Lot
24,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,247
SA SECTION 26
Parcel
010-51
261,360
Pond (20,000)
193,090
$0.050/s.f.
9,655
Future R/W (20%)
Parcel
020-51
94,500
Large Lot
40,380
$0.050/s.f.
2,019,
Parcel
011-52
276,930
Pond (20,000)
205,550
$0.050/s.f.
10,278
Future R'/W (20%)
Parcel
010-53
158,700
Large Lot
66,000
$0.050/s.f.
3,300
Page 11.
5153d 7y
S
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Lot 1, 013-00
Part of Lot 5,
055-00
Part of Lot 5,
051-00
Part of Lot 5,
052-00,
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 8
5153d
234,000
Pond
Total
82,500
Assessable
Lot
Large
Parcel
Lot
Area
Credit
Area
Assessment
Total
Description
106,840
(sq..ft.)
(Sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate
Assessment
Parcel
020-53
133,500
----
133,500
$0.050/s.f.
6,675
Parcel
010-54
330,000
Future R/W (20%)
264,000
$0.050/s.f.
13,200
Parcel
013-55
145,200
Pond (56,000)
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
1,650
Large Lot
Parcel
014-55
222,750
Pond (72,000)
66,000
$0,.050/s.f.
3,300
Large Lot
Parcel
010-56
414,510
Future R/W (20%)
331,610
$0.050/s.f.
16,581
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Lot 1, 013-00
Part of Lot 5,
055-00
Part of Lot 5,
051-00
Part of Lot 5,
052-00,
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 8
5153d
234,000
Pond
(32,000)
82,500
$0.50/s.f.
Lot
Large
Lot
Lot
190,000
384,120
Pond
(74,000)
248,090
$0.050/s.f.
106,840
Future
R/W (20%)
Large
225,000
Pond
(78,410)
65,410
$0.050/s.f.
Large
Large
Lot
Large
Lot
150,000
Pond
(7,000)
61,820
$0.050/s.f.
Large
Lot
64,710
Large
Lot
38,100
Large
Lot
38,700
Large
Lot
190,000
Pond
(66,000)
Large
Lot
106,840
Pond
(60,000)
Large
Lot
102,800
Pond
(32,000)
Large
Lot
23,290
Large
Lot
24,760
Large
Lot
Page 12.
73
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
16,500
$0,:050/s.f.
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
49,500
$0.050/s.f.
19,780 $0.050/s.f.
33,000 $0.050/s.f
16,500 $0.050/s.f.
16,500 $0.050/s.f.
4,125 AD
12,400
3,271(1)
3,091(1)
1,650
825
825
2,475
989
1,650
825
825
Page 13.
5153d /6
Total
Assessable
Parcel
Area
Credit
Area
Assessment
Total
Description
(sq.ft.)
(Sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate
Assessment
Lot
9
23,580
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825
Lot
10
65,200
Large
Lot
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
1,650(1)
Lot
11
24,750
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
12
19,200
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
13
34,400
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
14
54,400
Large
Lot
27,340
$0.050/s.f.
1,367(1)
Lot
15
185,400
Pond
(16,000)
66,000
$0.050/s.f.
3,300(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
16
64,350
Pond
(37,600)
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
17
63,840
Pond
(32,800)
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
18
54,000
Pond
(8,000)
18,940
$0.050/s.f.
947(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
19
30,000
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
20
48,230
Pond
(2,500)
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Large
Lot
OAK
POND HILLS
Lot
1,
Block 1
46,800
Large
Lot
19,740
$0.050/s.f.
$ 987(1)
Lot
2,
Block 1
44,000
Large
Lot
16,940
$0.050/s.f.
847
Lot
1,
Block 2
43,560
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
$ 825(1)
Lot
2,
Block 2
44,000
Large
Lot
16,940
$0.050/s.f.
847
Page 13.
5153d /6
Total Assessable
Parcel Area Credit Area Assessment Total
Description (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment
OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION
Lot
1,
Block
1
54,000
Large
Lot
26,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,347
Lot
2,
Block
1
50,000
Large
Lot
22,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,147
Lot
3,
Block
1
74,000
Large
Lot
30,440
$0.050/s.f.
1,522
Lot
4,
Block
1
50,000
Large
Lot
22,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,147
Lot
1,
Block
2
43,650
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825
Lot
2,
Block
2
44,000
Large
Lot
16,940
$0.050/s.f.
847
TOTAL (BASE PROJECT) ............ $172,525
TOTAL (INCLUDES ALTERNATE 1) ..... $193,738
(1) Total assessment if alternate is approved.
9
•
Page 14.
5153d
75,
,
•
HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET
LIFT STATION AND FORCERAAIN
PROJECT 444 R
EAGAN,MJNNESOTA
1
v
80NESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: 5/15/86
Comm. 49355 Fig. No. 1
n
0
co
3
0
3
m
z
cil
m
co
1y
0
{w -4
c
D 0
a
c
y O
0
ro
m
n0
D y
m
-im
mz
mm
�'m
z
w
0m_'
c
"'(D
zD
N
H
o z
O
m
r
x
DAKOTA COUNTY PARK wl)ONOUGN LAKE \
LP -45
0 600
NORTH
SCALE IN FEET
WD LP -34
4 882,7
w
0
O
m m
> m
0 m r
191m
D
r
D m
m
z
D
m
0 v
O m
w
0
3 m
z
Cn
m
y
co
c')
N
chw0Dm
0 P6 -i
ER CD
O
M
0
C NO
E�0M
3>
o n 0
co
m
m'
>0-im
mm
mz
m.
S y m
Z
oCD
_'
0
»
m z .>
q C7 Z
N
v
m
HOLLAND
LAKE
LP -76
LIFT STATION 81 FORCEMAIN
V-69 it
POND LP -61
$UDBERRY LN_ `�, erg eee. 6•
Ex. OVERLAND FLOW
DAKOTA COUNTY PARK
0 600
SCALE IN FEET
12'
McDONOUGM LAKE
LP -t9
NOR TM
POND V rN
N« eez.r
HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET
ASSESSMENT AREA
PROJECT 444R
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
L
LE
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK
8 ASSOCIATES. INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul. Minnesota
D ate: 5/15/86
Comm. 49355 Fig' No. 3
®-
RIF
y
I�
a
z
Dc
w
' I—
J
Q
I
Q =
LU
r
_ o
Q z
C z w
L ' N
w
U)
to
Q o
O -m r
BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK
f 8
HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET ASSOCIATES, INC.
ASSESSMENT AREA — ALTERNATE Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minnesota
PROJECT 444R
Date: 5% 15/86
EAGAN,MNNESOTA Comm. 49355 Fig• No.3 ALT.
Agenda Information Memo
-June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
• • s
TAX INCREMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCING PLAN/SPERRY PROJECT
A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment
Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development
District #1 --At the May 21, 1986, City Council meeting a public
hearing was held to consider and review the Sperry Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Economic Development District #1. The amount of
the tax increment financing is $700,000..00 which will be used for
related public improvements to the Sperry Project. The tax
increment financing is structured so that 508 of the new tax
increment will be used to pay off the $700,000.00 T.I.F. bonds,
while the remaining 508 increment that is generated by the new
project will go directly into the tax base so that all taxing
jurisdictions will realize the immediate benefit of increased taxes.
At the May 21 City Council meeting, final action on the Economic
Development District #1 planned and the development program could
not be taken due to the statutory requirement to notify both the
school district, which is Independent School District 196 and Dakota
County, to learn if they had any objections or concerns about the
proposed tax increment financing. There has been no correspondence
or communication from either jurisdictions since the letters and
documents were sent out in mid-May. Therefore action to consider
both the development program and tax increment financing plan for
Economic Development District #1 is in order for consideration.
Enclosed is a copy of the plan and program that was presented as a
part of the May 21 City Council packet.
Also enclosed is a copy of a development agreement, but the City
Administrator suggest it be drafted by both Council and the City
Attorney's Office_ This development agreement provides additional
protection to the City of Eagan and provides clarification on the
City's commitment and how funds will be disbursed as a part of the
tax increment financing program. A copy of that agreement is
Z3I.Tenclosed on pages0'/ through 4Z3_1-
There
here has been a great deal of news on the Sperry/Burroughs merger,
and if members of the City Council have any specific questions
regarding the recent acquisition of the Sperry Corporation by
Burroughs, Mr. Ed Michaud will be present at the City Council
meeting on Tuesday. There was also an article that appeared this
F/
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Two
past week in the Minneapolis paper suggesting that the semiconductor
plant may be sold. According to Mr. Michaud "to his knowledge
Sperry Corporation is not considering the sale of the semi -conductor
facility; however, due to the competition in the world of
semi -conductors, they are looking for a partner to enhance their
high technology research capabilities to remain competitive in the
industry". He also indicated that with the recent merger of
Burroughs there is even a stronger desire to maintain the
semi -conductor facility at its present location and possibly utilize
semi -conductor technology that the Burroughs Corporation can offer.
Grading has been continuing along on the site for the Sales and
Marketing facility and according to Mr. Michaud steel for the
building was ordered this past week allowing the project to continue
on schedule.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax
increment financing development program and plan for the Economic
Development District #1 or the Sperry Sales and Marketing facility.
•
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Tax Increment Financing Plan
Economic Development District #1
May 6, 1986
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1
BACKGROUND ................................................ 1
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ....................................... 1
Objectives ........................................... 1
Project Description .................................. 2
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 2
Statutory Authorization .............................. 2
® Basis for Findings ................................... 3
District Certification and Duration of Tax
Increment Financing District ....................... 3
Prior Planned Improvements ........................... 4
Original Assessed Value ............................... 4
Bonded Indebtedness .................................. 4
Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment .. 4
Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds 5
;. Uses of Tax Increment .........
Additional Financings ................................ 5
Fiscal Disparities ................................... 6
Impact on Other Taxing. Jurisdictions ................. 6
EXHIBIT
A - Development Program for Economic Development
• District No. 1 .................................. A-1
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT No. 1
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
INTRODUCTION
This Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") has been
prepared by the City of Eagan, Minnesota (the "City") under the
requirements of the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act (the
"Act"), Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78. The City
herein proposes and describes the establishment of a Tax Incre-
ment Financing District within the coterminous Economic Develop-
ment District No. 1, for purposes of financing public improve-
ments required to support a major private -sector development,
consisting of a proposal by Sperry Corporation to construct and
operate a 295,000 square foot office and computer center and
related facilities (the "Improvements").
BACKGROUND
The City Council has called for a public hearing on the
"3 formation of both Economic Development District No. 1 and the Tax
Increment Financing District, for May 21, 1986. On June 17, 1986,
subject to public input, the Council will consider both the
Development Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Economic
Development District No. 1 is being established as a Development
District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A.
A copy of the proposed Development Program for Economic
Development District No. 1 and a legal description of the
District are attached as an Exhibit to this Plan and are hereby
incorporated by reference as part of this Plan.
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Objectives
The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in
establishing Economic Development District No. 1 are as follows:
1. To promote and secure the prompt development of a
major office and technology facility contributing to the tax
base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. To reduce the cost of
manner permitting the completion
economic basis.
development of property in a
of a facility on an
•
3. To secure the construction and provide monies for
the payment of the costs of public improvements in and
adjacent to the District, which are necessary for the orderly
and complete development of the District in a manner which
will promote the attractiveness of the area and promote
public safety.
4. To promote economic development which will add to
the employment opportunities in the community, and add to
the tax base of the community by increasing taxable values
and increasing the need for commercial development.
Project Description
The actions expected to be taken by the City within the
Economic Development District No. 1 include: acquisition and in-
stallation of traffic signals, construction of new bicycle paths,
construction of new utility laterals (including water, sanitary
and storm sewers) and other project improvements consistent with
the objectives of the Development Program. Further details of
the specific public actions are included in the Development
Program of the Project, appended to this Plan. No land will be
acquired by the City in connection wi'-h the Development Program.
No contracts have been entered into at this time in connection
C"I with any such development activities.
Anticipated private developments within Economic
Development District No. 1 include the construction and operation
of a 295,000 square foot office and computer center by Sperry
Corporation, the owners of the property within the District. It
is expected that construction on this Development will commence
in the summer of 1986, and be completed at the end of 1987, and
® have a final estimated market value of approximately $15,100,000.
Further details of this project are included in the Development
Program of the Project, appended to this Plan.
TAY INCREMENT FINANCING
Statutory Authorization
Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the City is
authorized to create the Tax Increment Financing District
coterminous with Economic Development District No. 1, to issue
the Bonds to finance public improvements within the Project for
the purpose of stimulating private development and to utilize tax
increments captured from the Tax Increment Financing District due
to new private development to meet debt service obligations on
these Bonds.
Basis for Findinas
The City has established the following facts:
a) The parcel of land within the District (as identi-
fied in Exhibit A) is owned by Sperry Corporation. With the
inducement provided by the Development Program and the offer
of a,$1 million low-interest loan by the State of Minnesota,
Sperry Corporation is expected to construct the Development.
The Development is expected to have a value of approximately
$15,100,000 and have approximately 700 employees. The Tax
Increment Financing District therefore qualifies as an
"Economic Development" district under Statutes 273.73,
Subdivision 12.
b) The Development Program for Economic Development •
District No. 1, and this Plan, have been reviewed by the
Planning Commission of the City, and found to be in
conformance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City.
c) The opportunity and feasibility for development of
Economic Development District No. 1 by private parties is
maximized through the use of tax increment financing. Given
the unavailability of funding from other governmental
sources other than the $1 million low-interest loan offered
by the State of Minnesota and the necessity of the improve-
ments to be constructed as an inducement to the Development,
the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within Economic Development
District No. 1.
d) Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3, of the •
Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation
as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for
the City under the Fiscal Disparities requirements (Chapter
473F) will be applied against commercial/industrial
properties within the Tax Increment Financing District.
District Certification and Duration of Tax Increment Financing
District
The City expects to request a certification of this
District in 1986, following a scheduled public hearing on May 21,
1986, and following a thirty -day review period by Dakota County
and affected school districts.
As an Economic Development Tax Increment Financing
District, the maximum life of the District is the lesser of (i)
eight years from the date of collection of the first increment,
;`' which is expected to be July, 1988, or (ii) 10 years from the
0—
date of approval of this Tax Increment Financing Plan, which is
expected to be June 17, 1986. The City retains the option of
terminating the District upon the redemption of the Bonds.
Prior Planned Improvements
No building permits have been issued by the City for
any parcels within the Tax Increment Financing District, in the
first fifteen months of the eighteen month time period preceding
the expected date of approval of the Tax Increment Financing
District by the City.
Original Assessed Value
It is anticipated that the District will be approved on
June 17, 1986, and that certification will be requested of the
Dakota County Auditor soon thereafter. The Original Assessed
Value of the District will therefore be the value assessed in
1986 for taxes payable in 1987. The original assessed valuation
of the District has not yet been determined because the creation
of the District will require identification of a new tax parcel,
but it is expected that the original assessed value will not
exceed $2 million at any time folloc.ing the adjustments required
by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes. Pursuant to Section
273.76, Minnesota Statutes, the Original Assessed Value of the
District for each of the next 10 years will be required to be
adjusted annually by the average percentage increase in the
assessed valuation of the property included in the District
during the previous five years.
Bonded Indebtedness
• It is currently anticipated that the City will issue
the Bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $700,000. This
amount includes enough capitalized interest to meet debt service
obligations up to the point that sufficient tax increments are
estimated to be generated to meet debt service obligations.
Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment
Current financial projections for the Tax Increment
Financing District, based on assumptions that include an estimated
final market value of the Improvements of $15,100,000, an estimated
assessed valuation of the Improvements of $6,493,000, a constant
mill rate of 102.138 mills, a fiscal disparities contribution
ratio of 28.8877%, and the termination of the District in the
year 1996, suggest that the total tax increment to be generated
by the District will equal at least $400,000, of which $200,.000
will be retained by the City for payment of debt service on the
Bonds. Assuming no inflation in property values after the
g7
e
Improvement's initial assessment, it is estimated that the
District will have an annual Captured Assessed Values following
completion of the Improvement $6,493,000, less any adjustment
required by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes.
Estimated Uses of Funds
.It is estimated that the proceeds of the Bonds will be
expended approximately as follows:
Uses:
Capitalized interest
$ 63,555
Construction Costs for
Improvements
Traffic Signals
$ 55,000
Bike Trail
32,000
Utilities and Other
535,482
622,482
Costs,.of Issuance
Bond•Discount
7,000
6,963
$700,000
Uses of Tax Increments
Under Section 273.75, Subdivision 4, of the Act, the
City will use the tax increments generated from the Captured
Assessed Value of the District to pay the principal and interest
on the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements. Pursuant to
Section 273.75, Subdivision 2, of the Act, the City elects to
retain 100% of all increments collected, however,, to the extent
that receipts of tax increment exceed the debt service require-
ments for the bonds to be issued an amount up to 500 of the
increments are expected to be returned to the County Auditor for
distribution to affected taxing jurisdictions.
Notwithstanding the above, the City retains the option,
at any time during the life of the District, to retain some
portion less than 100% of the annual tax increment, and pass on
the remaining portion to the other taxing jurisdictions.
The City also retains the option, pursuant to Section
273.74, Subdivision 4, of modifying this Plan to include further
expenditures of tax increments for additional public purposes.
Additional Financi
The City presently anticipates no other additional
financing for the District.
•
Fiscal Disparities
Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3 of the Act,
the City elects to utilize the method of computing Captured
Assessed Value as defined under clause (b).
Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Because the proposed Improvements are occurring con-
tingent on the City's provision of the improvements contemplated
by the Development Program as financed by tax increments, it is
determined that this Tax Increment Financing District will have
no impact on other taxing jurisdiction during the life of the
District. The other jurisdictions will continue to receive
property taxes from the District based on the Original Assessed
® Value, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with Section
273.76, Subd. 1 of the Act. At the termination of the District,
the other taxing jurisdictions will receive the entire assessed
value of the new development as part of their tax base.
u
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
EAGAN TAX INCREMENT PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
A. STATEMENT OF INTENT
It is the intent of the City of Eagan to organize a
development district and undertake a development program within
the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A, and to designate
the project area as Development District No. 1 (the "District")
for purposes of carrying out the improvements hereinafter
described and establishing the project area as a tax increment
financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71
to 273.78, in the financing of the improvements herein described.
In particular, there has been presented to the City a plan for
the construction of certain improvements in order to induce the
construction of an office and computer center to provide
employment opportunities and enhance the tax base of the City.
B. STATEMENT OF NEED
There is a need for new development in the City to
provide employment opportunities, to increase the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state and the City. This need
can be accomplished through the attraction of commercial and
industrial development. In the case of the District, significant
development can be attracted by the Program described herein.
The action herein proposed to be taken by the City is found to
have,a public purpose in accordance with Chapter 472A, Minnesota
Statutes, and is necessary to meet those needs.
C. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT AND TO
The City has power to establish a tax increment
financing district under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to
273.78, and to undertake development programs as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. The City has authority under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.03 to acquire, construct, recon-
struct, improve, alter, extend, operate, maintain or promote
developments aimed at improving the physical facilities, quality
of life and quality of transportation.
D. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in
establishing its Development District No. 1 and in carrying out
the Development Program for the District are as follows:
E
1. To promote and secure,the prompt development of a
major office and computer facility contributing to the tax
base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. To reduce the cost of development of property in a
manner permitting the completion of the facility on an
economic basis.
3. To provide monies for the payment of the costs of
improvements in and adjacent to the District, which are
necessary for the orderly and complete development of the
District and which will provide public safety.
E. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITIES
® The objectives of this development district will be
accomplished through the following actions by the City:
1. Purchase and install traffic signals at the
intersection of Towerview Road and Pilot Knob Road and at
the future main entrance intersection opposite Jurdy Road on
Pilot Knob Road.
2. Construct bicycle trail improvement from Quarry
Hill Park to Pilot Knob Park through the District.
3. New installation of utilities, including water,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer.
4. Other project improvements within the Development
• District which are consistent with the objectives of the
Development Program, including fire loop, street, street
lighting and site improvements.
Sperry Corporation is expected to construct a 250,000
square foot office and computer facility in the northeast
portion of the District. This facility is expected to
employ approximately and to have a market value
upon completion of approximately $15,100,000.
F. LAND USE
All development on lands in Economic Development
District No. 1 will be subject to the following uses and
requirements.
1. Permitted Uses
Development District No. 1 is designated as Research
and Development on the adopted Comprehensive Plan, and any
IF/
A-2
permitted use in such areas as defined by the Eagan Compre-
hensive Plan will be permitted, provided the use does not
have a significant adverse effect on surrounding uses in
terms of noise, traffic generation, congestion and
appearance as determined by the City. The "Research and
Development" classification provides special standards which
promote compatibility with adjacent residential uses.
2. Additional Regulations and Controls or
Restrictions to be Imposed.
a. All new development shall conform to the
applicable State and local codes and ordinances.
G. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. Site Design
Conformance with the Eagan Zoning Ordinance set forth
in the Eagan City Code must be complied with reference to all
site preparation, construction of buildings, parking areas,
etc., landscaping and all other provisions thereof.
2. Required Documents
The Public Works Director of the City of Eagan shall be
provided with all documents that he may require including,
but not limited to site plan, grading and storm drainage
plans, utility and lighting plan and all otherhe deems
necessary to determine the conformance of the proposed
development with the design standards.
3. Comprehensive Plan
The objectives of the City of Eagan Comprehensive Guide
Plan shall be adhered to in order to control the uses of the
property, including economic viability, environmental impact,
community facilities, parks and open space and transportation.
H. LAND ACQUISITION
No properties to be acquired by the City in connection
with the Development Program.
I. RELOCATION OF.DISPLACED PERSONS
There is no relocation contemplated in Development
District No. 1.
J. MAINTENANCE OF PROJECT AREA
The City Administrator shall be responsible for the
administration of Development District No. 1 on behalf of the
City of Eagan.
K. GEOGRAPHIC MODIFICATION
In accordance with M.S.A. 273.74, Subd. 4, the geo-
graphic area of the District may be reduced but may not be
enlarged after five (5) years following the date of the
designation of the District. This District may, therefore, be
expanded until 1991. Geographic modification shall be in
accordance with M.S.A. 273.74.
® L. ATTACHMENTS
There are attached hereto for further elucidation and
description, the following maps and drawings:
D E V E L O P M E N T
A G R E E M E N T
CITY OF EAGAN and SPERRY CORPORATION
DATED:
PARTIES: The CITY OF EAGAN, Dakota County, Minnesota, called "the City", and
SPERRY CORPORATION, called "Sperry".
RECITALS: 40
1. The City has formed an economic development district pursuant to
Chapter 472A, Minnesota Statutes, and a tax increment financing district
pursuant to Sections 273.71 to 273.78, Minnesota Statutes, known as Economic
Development District No. 1, consisting of the property owned by Sperry
described in Exhibit "A" hereto (the "District").
2. The City has approved an economic Development Program for the District
under which it proposes to undertake the public improvements described therein
and in paragraph 1 hereof (the "Public Improvements").
3. In consideration of the Development Program, Sperry intends to
construct an approximately 295,000 square foot office and computer center and
related facilities in the District (the "Private Development").
4. The City intends to finance the economic Development Program with the
issuance of $700,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1986 (the "Bonds"), which
are intended to be repaid primarily from the proceeds of tax increments from
the District.
(��3A
I
COVENANTS: In consideration of the mutual obligations of the parties hereto,
the City and Sperry hereby agree as follows:
1. Public Improvements. Subject to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 hereof, the
City shall- acquire and construct the following Public Improvements in the
District:
a. Internal access roads
b. Internal storm drainage
®
C. Internal water distribution and fire loop system including.
hydrants and valves
a. Internal sanitary sewer collection systems
e. Semaphore traffic signals at Pilot Knob Road/Tower View Road
f. Internal bicycle/pedestrian trail
2. A Public Improvement Project. Except for the semaphore traffic
signals, and bicycle/pedestrian trail, which shall be designed, constructed
® and installed to the City's specifications, Sperry shall furnish plans and
specifications and contract documents for the Public Improvements to the City.
If such plans and specifications and contract documents are acceptable to the
City, the City shall advertise for bids and award contracts for the work in
accordance with.any applicable public bidding requirements. The work on the
Public Improvements shall commence and proceed at such times and in such
manner as shall be necessary, in the judgment of Sperry, to permit completion
of the Private Development in an expeditious manner. Sperry or any contractor
employed by Sperry shall be eligible to submit a bid for such Public
Improvements.
/vB
2
3. Supervision by Sperry. Any contract shall provide that the contractor
is subject to the direction of Sperry or its agents in the performance of the
work. In the event the work is defective or in the event of default by any
contractor, the City shall, at the reasonable request and expense of Sperry,
pursue any remedies available under the contracts for the benefit of Sperry
which costs shall be paid by Sperry. Sperry shall provide access to its
property in the District to permit construction of the Public Improvements.
The terms of such access may be part of the plans and specifications.
4. Limit of City Responsibility. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the City
shall have no obligation to pay more than the aggregate amount for the Public
Improvements. It is understood that the tax increment bonds provided under
paragraph 5 shall cover the aggregate total of all issuance costs, bona
discount costs, capitalized interest, semaphore installation and trail
improvements which total amounts may not be determined for a substantial time
following the issuance of the bonds. Sperry hereby agrees to indemnify and
hold the City harmless for all expenditures and liabilities of the City in
connection with the Public Improvements in excess of $700-,000.00 less the
future costs for the semaphore and trail installation and all City issuance
expenses.
5. Issuance of Bonds. The City's obligation under paragraph 2 is also
subject to the ability of the City to issue $700,000 of general obligation tax
increment bonds to provide funds for the Development Program. The City shall
use its best efforts to issue such bonds prior to August 15, 1986.
6. Failure to Complete. Sperry agrees to construct the Private
Development substantially in accordance with the scale and scope of the
Private Developments as described in preliminary designs furnished to the
93�
3
•
•
City. In the event Sperry fails to complete such Private Developments by
19_, Sperry shall reimburse the City for amounts expended
by the City on the Public Improvements, related City costs and interest
expenses on the Bonds which the City does not recover from earnings on
investments and tax increment from the District.
7. Design Charges. It is understood that the cost of preparing the plans
and specifications for the public improvements including the future semaphores
and park trail improvements shall/shall not be included in the finances
proposed under this Agreement. .
8. Schedule. Projected schedule for the Public Improvements is as
follows:
City Council Approval of Plans and Advertise for bids May 21, 1986
Opening of bids June 13, 1986
Award of Contract by City Council June 17, 1986
Substantial Completion Nov. 15, 1986
Final Completion June 1, 1987
9. Termination. In the event that the Private Development is terminated
for any reason prior to or during the course of construction of the Public
Improvement project or the construction of the office and computer facility
then Sperry shall pay the City upon the request of the City for all costs
incurred by the City including the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds
and all costs involved in the design and construction of the public
improvements and administrative, engineering, legal and all other costs
incurred by the City in relation thereto.
10. Approvals. It is understood that Sperry or its designated
representatives shall mutually approve all payment requests and/or changes for
the Public Improvements intended to be installed according to this agreement.
(73,D
4
11. Hold Harmless. Except for the duties and responsibilities of the City
involved in the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds, and the
responsibilities of the City specified under this Agreement for Public
Improvements, the City shall have no further responsibility for acquisition of
and compliance with permits required ,under paragraph 13, or the design,
construction and inspection of the Public Improvements or the Private
Development and Sperry, its successors and assigns shall hold the City, its
agents and representatives harmless from any and all claims or causes of
action which may result from the construction of the public improvements and
the private development contemplated under this agreement.
12. Completion of Project. At such time as all the Public Improvements
and the Private Development contemplated under this Agreement are completed,
the City will assign all of its right, title and interest in such
improvements to Sperry and the City shall then have no further responsibility
under this agreement.
13. Permits and Licenses. Sperry shall acquire all necessary permits,
licenses and approvals for the construction and development of the office and
computer center and related facilities contemplated under this Agreement
whether from the State of Minnesota, City of Eagan or any other applicable
public agency.
14. Waiver of Objections. Sperry hereby waives notice of any and all
hearings required and waives any and all objections and appeals pursuant to
M.S.A. 9 429.
15. Recording. The undersigned hereby agree that this Agreement may be
recorded with the Dakota County Recorder and that the parties shall execute
any and all documents necessary to implement the recording of this Agreement
including the delivery of the owners duplicate certificate of title to the
affected lands if necessary.
5
16. Successors and Assigns. The undersigned hereby agree that this
Agreement shall run with the affected land described in Exhibit "A". and bind
the heirs, successors and assigns of such land until terminated by written
agreement of the parties hereto.
17. Affected Parties. The undersigned include all the persons, firms or
corporations that hold an interest in or are involved in this Agreement and
the undersigned officials are authorized to sign this Agreement and to bind
the respective parties.
® 18. Copy of the Agreement. Each of the parties heretohas read this
Agreement and has received acopy thereof and agrees to execute any and all
documents necessary to implement the terms of this Agreement.
19. Notices. Notices required or authorized to be given hereunder, until
written notice of change of offices or addresses is given to all parties
concerned, shall begivenas follows:
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Sperry Corporation
20. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by written
agreement of the parties.
21. Remedies of the Parties.. The terms of this Agreement shall be legally
enforceable by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction andeach of
the parties retains the right to assert any legal, equitable, or
administrative right of action or defense which may be available by law in
order to implement or enforce the terms of this Agreement.
gi3F
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement,
consisting of eight (8) pages, including the following page, to be executed by
the signature of their duly authorized officers, as of the date first written
above.
CITY OF EAGAN
(Date:
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Eagan City Attorney
(Date: )
Approved as to Content:
Director of Public Works
(Date: )
Approved as to Content:
City Administrator
(Dated: )
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Hauge, Eide n Keller, P. A.
Attorneys for the City of Eagan
1200 Yankee Doodle Road
Water View Office Tower, Suite 303
Eagan, MN 55123
(612) 456-9000
7
SPERRY CORPORATION
By: / ®.
Date
Its:
By: /
Date
Its
By: /
Date
Its:
And: /
Date �•
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared BEATTA BLOMQUIST and E. J.
VanOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did
say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the CITY OF EAGAN, the
municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to
said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipality by
authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said
instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality.
(SEAL)
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
as.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public
within ana for said County personally appeared
ana to me personally known, who, being each by me
duly sworn that they are respectively the ana
of the Corporation named in the foregoing instrument,
and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said
• corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said
corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said
and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and
deed of the corporation.
(S E A L)
93f�
SPERRY PARK
all
auu � rta.
�1� r
1
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 19'86, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Three
OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70
B The Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis
Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and
Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/
Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986 City Council meeting
authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth
off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the
City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this
license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action
continued the license to allow for a public hearing.and potential
amendmend to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm
five (5) off -sale liquor license or remove the ceiling on the
number of off -sale liquor license to be granted within the communi-
ty. If action is taken under Item A public hearing to remove
the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications this license
can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the
five (5) then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing
the off -sale liquor license maximum from four to five as acted
upon by the City Council at the May 6 meeting.
Enclosed without page number is a copy of the application and
police officer's report that were included with the May 21 packet.
e�Z
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON
THIS ITEM:
To approve or deny an
off -sale liquor- license for
Curtis O.
Johnson for location of
the Town Centre/Eagan.Shopping
Center.
e�Z
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Four
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION
CUL DE SAC RECONSIDERATION
C. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition -Cul de ,Sac Reconsideration --
At the May 20 Council meeting, the Council considered a request
from the Opus Corporation regarding the requirement to eliminate
the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac from the proposed Eagandale
Office Park 3rd Addition. This item was continued until the
June 17 meeting to allow proper representation and background
justification for this request. Enclosed on pages �24 and
is a letter justifying this request. Enclosed on pages
and are the two configurations of the proposed final
plat„ with nd without the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac.
Enclosed on page -,� is a copy of the minutes from the December
3 Council meeting, where the original discussion took place that
resulted in the cul de sac being eliminated as a condition of
final plat approval.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the de-
veloper's request to plat a public right-of-way cul de sac, servic-
ing Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition.
I
OPUS CORPORATION
DESIGNERS 4 BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS
' 1 ii3g
June 11, 1986
Mr. Tom Colbert
Public Works Director
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Re: Trapp Road Cul -de -Sac
Dear Mr. Colbert:
Reference is made to your letter of May 30, 1986 requesting more
background information in support of our proposed cul-de-sac off of
• Trapp Road which the Council voted to eliminate from our plat of
Eagandale Park 3rd Addition a few weeks ago.
We, at Opus, understand the Council's position on construction of new
cul -de -.sacs within the city of Eagan. However, we feel an exception to
this position should be considered in relation to this proposed
cul-de-sac which is designed to service the cluster of offices proposed
for the northwest corner of Eagandale Business Center.
The State Highway Department's requirements for additional right-of-way
from the northerly lots of the Business Center for extension of I-494
made it necessary to realign Trapp Road east of Pilot Knob and
reconfigure the lots it was originally designed to service.
In addition, when the new interchange for 35E and I-494 was constructed,
our old direct front door Highway 55 access was significantly altered.
To compensate for these highway related changes, we relocated our
® entrance for the Business Center to Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center
Drive. To enhance this new entrance into the Center for customers and
owners, we reconfigured the alignment of Corporate Center Drive, resized
and configured the old lots into new accessible parcels and created a
master development plan that would place our highest image buildings
(offices and hotel) at this new entrance to the Center. Our intent was
to create a new sense of place and identity for the new businesses
locating in the vacinity of Pilot Knob, Trapp Road and Corporate Center
Drive. The use of a common drive, exciting architecture and landscaping
helps achieve these ,objectives. That is why the "Trapp Court"
cul-de-sac was and is being proposed for the area as shown on the plat
of Eagandale 3rd Addition. We used this concept of high visibility and
convenient public access from Pilot Knob and Trapp Road to sell Sperry
on the site that they are currently developing.
It should also be pointed Out that this is the only cul-de-sac that is
being proposed for all of the undeveloped property in this northwest
section of the Business Center. Given the design and land development
objectives that we are currently fulfilling in this area of the Center,
we feel the cul-de-sac should be approved.
Please call if you have questions Z would hope that the explanation
OPUS AND AFFILIATES IN MINNEAPOLIS • CHICAGO -PHOENIX. MILWAUKEE -TAMPA - PENSACOLA
EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 800 OPUS CENTER 49900 BREN ROAD EAST 4 PO BOX 150-MINN EAPOL IS. MINNESOTA 55440 (612)936-4444
I
Mr. Tom Colbert
June 11, 1986
Page 2
given herein to justify the Trapp Court cul—de—sac is sufficient to
warrant your support at the June 17 Council Meeting.
Bees�t" Regards,
Robert A. Worthington, AICP
Executive Director — Governmental Affairs
RAW: jo
cc: Tom Davis
Tom Hedges
97
OPUS CORPORATION
/JY
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION
41`%
f-trr_ T • r� • �
LOT
9
�J � y.ru- -: ✓. / 1
:.i
Council Minutes
December 3, 1985
YORKTON I S YORRTON II - IR FINANCING
The final resolutions for the proposed industrial revenue bond issues for
Yorkton I and Yorkton II'vere submitted and the applicant requested approval.
Mike Gresser appeared for the applicant and Tom Hedges indicated that the City
has not received a letter from bond counsel satisfying the City staff's
concerns that the bonds could become taxable due to the procedural variance
required for the application. In addition, the final documents for the bond
project had not been received for review by the City Administrator or City
Attorney. After discussion, Egan moved, Thomas seconded the motion to
approve the final resolutions for the two bona issues, each in the sum of
$600,000.00, subject however, to submission and approval by the City staff of.
the bond counsel letter described above, and approval of the final transcript
for the bond issues. All voted yes.
EAGANDAIM INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
The application for preliminary plat approval of Eagandale Industrial Park
3rd Addition consisting of a replat of Eagandale Industrial Park Lots 2, 3,
and 4, Block 2, came to the Council. The APC recommended approval at its
November 26, 1985 meeting, subject to certain conditions. The plat would
combine four existing lots and three new lots, north of Corporate Center Drive *_
and west of Trapp Road, according to Dale Runkle. There was considerable:`
discussion concerning the cul-de-sac proposed to be converted to a private
cross easement built to City standards. Gerald Sunde of Sunde Engineering was
present and recommended that the cul-de-sac remain a public street. After
review, Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the preliminary
plat application for Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The proposed public cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and a private
street be provided for access to the lots.
2. The owner and developer will be responsible for any damage to any
retaining wall and grading damages as a result of necessary maintenance of
the City's storm and sanitary sewer lines within the sanitary and storm sewer
easement along the southwesterly boundary of the property.
3. The watermain that the developer proposes to construct shall be built
in accordance .with City specifications and properly verified that the
contractor adhered to City standards.
4. This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary MWCC
connection permits.
.5. The cul-de-sac, Trapp Court, shall be constructed in accordance with
City standards for a tear drop design and 9 ton standards.
6. This development shall dedicate a 20 foot utility and drainage
easement adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way.
/610
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN REGULATIONS
D. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign
Regulations --At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the
City staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for
the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections
of city collector and/or county roads. The policy was presented
at the April 1, 1986 City Council meeting for review and considera-
tion. For a copy of a memo of direction by the City Administrator
and a study completed by the Sign Inspector and Chief Building
Inspector, refer to pages /07/ through j�. Following review
and consideration of the temporary advertising signs policy,
Councilmember Ellison suggested "that one sign be permitted at
each intersection which would include several developers and
one standard with each developer potentially being able to place
a sign on more then one standard . After discussion, Smith moved,
Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the
policy with the request that staff review the proposal and prepare
and submit guidelines regarding locations, sizes, costs, color
priorities and users to the City Council for later consideration.
All voted yea." Following the motion, specific direction was
given to the City Administrator which is outlined in the attached
memo enclosed on pages /6-5, through L� to the Chief Building
Inspector. Mr. Borgschatz has responded to the April 4 memo;,
and for a copy of his findings, refer to pages /D through
® The cost projected for a steel sign seems high, however, individual
signs that are being purchased and placed by developers throughout
the community at various intersections are expensive and in some
cases might compete with the cost for one reader board. There
are many considerations, such as 1) The City monitoring the
program as outlined by our Sign Inspector, 2) to adopt by ordinance
a temporary advertising sign and then submit a request for proposal
and allow various sign companies to bid on the reader board and
manage the same for the City of Eagan. In other words, a developer
would contact the sign company directly and buy time on the reader
board at the quote presented to the City. 3) Developers will
be restricted with the information that can be placed on a reader
board, eliminating use of their logo and other marketing informa-
tion. 4) Steel signs are certainly more expensive then
signs but require much less maintenance. The City could erect
the reader board signs during winter months, therefore providing
both the management and construction/installation service.
Reader boards at strategic locations, throughout the City would
eliminate numerous temporary advertising signs. that are being
placed by developers and builders. Additional philosophy should
be considered regarding 1) the amount of regulatory control the
/D /
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 198'6, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Six
TEMP ADVERTISING SIGNS CONT'D
City desires to place on builders and developers advertising
their business within the City. 2) If additional regulatory
control is desired, whether the City or private sector should
manage the installation of the signs. Because of the investment
certain developers and builders have made in temporary advertising
signs,, any change in policy might require either a sunset or
grandfather provision, to slowly eliminate those signs that are
currently in existence while freezing any replacement of new
temporary advertising signs.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To discuss and provide addi-
tional direction as to whether the City wishes to amend its Sign
Ordinance by regulating the use of reader boards for any and
all temporary advertising signs throughout the City.
/0/R
MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986
SUBJECT: NEW POLICY FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION AND
LOCATION OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at
their regular meeting held on Tuesday, January 7, 1986, staff was
directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of
temporary advertising signs at the intersections of City collector
and/or County roads. The City Council commends your department on
the excellent work that Elmer Borgschatz and you have performed in
tightening up and carrying out regulatory provisions set for the
location of signs throughout the City. In a discussion at the
meeting, it is the desire of the City Council to develop additional
policy that will further tighten up the location of temporary
® advertising signs throughout the City.
First, the City Council would like an inventory of signs that are
located on major City collector roads such as Blackhawk and all
County roads throughout the City. This inventory or list of
existing signs would include the duration (what amount of time is
remaining of the two-year, temporary status) and the quality of
the existing sign.
Secondly, the City Council is asking that the policy for consider-
ation include several of the following points: 1) temporary
advertising signs must be placed in a specific location not to
block any sight distance or view for the motorist; 2) consider-
ation should be given to the adoption of criteria that would
establish a distance between temporary advertising signs (much the
same as general advertising) for aesthetic purposes; 3) a require-
ment would exist that all adjacent property owners must be notified
and provide consent for the placement of a temporary advertising
sign; 4) the size and type of structure for a temporary advertising
sign should again be reviewed; 5) consideration should be given to
criteria that would establish a maintenance provision allowing
City staff to require certain on-going maintenance of a temporary
advertising sign; and 6) other conditions that might be suitable
for a new temporary sign policy.
The City Council would like the inventory completed and a policy
to review by the first meeting in March. With the amount of
growth that is occurring, we anticipate the request for many more
temporary advertising signs; therefore, there is some urgency in
preparing a new policy for City Council consideration.
City Administrator
TLH/kf �6y
Agenda Information Memo
April 1, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
REVIEW CURRENT POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
B. Review of Current Policy for Temporary Advertising Signs --The
City staff was directed, at a recent City Council meeting, to
inventory all temporary advertising signs on major collector roads
throughout the city. Further action taken at the January 7, 1986,
City Council meeting directed the City staff to prepare options for
revisions to the sign ordinance and sign policy concerning advertis-
ing directional signs.
Procedure requiring acceptable maintenance conditions has been
established by the Protective Inspections Department along with an
inventory that was completed and copied to each member of the City
Council during early March. There are many regulatory alternatives
to review, however, the three (3) options listed in the Chief
Building Official's Report were as follows:
Option 1. Leave the City Code 4.20 subdivision 1C9 and allow
the City Council to grant special permits using the
criteria of City 4.20 subdivisions 2 & 3 which
establish setbacks and standards.
Option 2: Limit temporary signs to a one-year maxi -mum time
span, limited to Eagan developments only, area
limitation of 24 sq.feet, limit top edge of sign at •
9 feet above street level, limit bottom edge of sign
to 6 feet above s.ze�' level, a limit of two (2)
signs per intersection corner, and a minimum of 50
feet separation between signs.
Option 3: An immediate moratorium on all temporary advertising
signs and phase out existing signs as permits
expire.
Enclosed on page�. is a copy of the sign survey of 31 inter-
sections in EaganIf any member of the City Council has misplaced
the specific sign locations, an additional copy can be made avail-
able.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or suggest a
regulatory change for the control and issuance of temporary adver-
tising signs.
SIGN SURVEY OF THIRTY ONE INTERSECTIONS IN EAGAN
Hwy 149 -& Lone Oak Rd --
No
sign
Hwy 149 -& Yankee Doodle -
1
sign
( 3 sised, in sw corner
Dodd Rd -& Diffley -
2
"
( SW corner )
Hwy 3 -& Diffley -
1
"
( SW corner, Homeowners Produce for sale) no permit
Cliff Rd-& Hwy 3 -
1
"
( SW corner )
Cliff Rd & Dodd Rd -
2
"
( 1 in NIB, 1 in NE corner)
Cliff Rd & Lexington -
2
"
( NE corner )
Cliff Rd & Pilot Knob -
3
"
( NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Thomas Lake -
3
"
( 1 in NE , 2 in NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Safari B H -
2
"
( 1 in NE , 1 in S.E corner )
Cliff Rd & Johnny Cake -
1
"
( SE corner )
®
Cliff Rd & Galaxie -
1
"
( SE corner )
Cliff Rd & Rahn Rd -
3
"
( 3 in NE corner )
Cliff Rd & Nicols -
2
"
( 1 BP in NE corner, 1 BP in SE Corner )
Cliff Rd & Slater -
1
"
( 1 in SW corner Service station sign pending)
Cliff Rd & Cinamin Ridge -
Q
"
( no sign )
Cedar Ridge & Shale -
0
"
( no sign )
Blackhawk &0
�Y 3 -
3
It
(3 in SW corner)
Diffley & Thomas Lake -
2
It
( 1 in NW , 1 in NE corner )
Diffley & Pilot Knob -
5
"
( 2 in NW, 3 in NE corner )
Beerwood & Pilot Knob -
3
"
( 1 in NE corner , (3 2 in 5E corner Should be remov
Diffley & Lexington -
7
"
( 1 in NE corner 6 in SE corner )
Diffley & Trenton -
4
".
(l.in SE corner, on Right/a/way & 3 signs in SW cor
Wescott & Lexington -
2
"
( 2 in NW corner )
Yamkee Doodle * Lex. -
5
"
( 1 NW, 1 SW, 3 SE & 1 in NE corner )
Yankee Doodle &Pilot E,nob-
0
"
( 2 pylon signs , Hotel and Super America )
Yankee Doodle & Hwy 13 -
0
"
Four Oaks & Hwy 13 -
1
"
( I sign NE corner)
Lone Oak & Hwy 13 -
0
"
Lone Oak & Pilot Knob -
1
"
( Blackhawk Glen - No permit )
Lone Oak & Lexington -
3
"
( 2 in SE , 1 in NE corner )
Summary
1 intersection, 7 signs
2 If 5 "
1 u 4 u
s
6 3
7 " 2 If
g u 1 u
6 " 0
Total
31 intersections
1
signs
MEMO TO: CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 4, 1986
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY -OWNED/
STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action that was taken by the City Council at their
April 1, 1986, meeting, a concept was given consideration whereby
the City would construct and install uniform, temporary advertising
signs throughout approved locations within the City. These signs
would be designed to accommodate several identification signs that
would meet a specific specificationand design standard. Please
make reference to the example that was prepared by City Council -
member Ellison and is attached for your reference.
The City Council is concerned about the number of temporary
advertising signs that are located at busy intersections throughout
the community. I would like you to give consideration to this new
concept that was proposed by the City Council and determine the
feasibility of the project. Please take into consideration the
following:
1. Locations: It would be necessary to determine the loca-
tions that are suitable for installing a City -owned stan-
dardized sign.
2. Size: Please prepare a set of specifications that would
standardize the sign and each reader board/identification
sign.
3. Cost: Please estimate the cost for construction and
installation of these signs. Also determine which each
of the individual reader board/identifications would cost
to construct and, further, what. is fair in terms of
rental charges by the City.
4. Priority: Please determine a method in which the reader
board/identification signs would be rented considering
priority of space on the City sign and, further, the
duration of time that those identification signs would be
allowed.
5. Number of Signs: Please determine how many signs could
be placed on one of the overall signs and, further,
whether more than one size of sign 'should be given
consideration. Please see #2 above.
6. Locations: Currently, a development is allowed two (2)
temporary advertising signs in addition to any signs that
are allowed on the subject development parcel. It would
be necessary to determine the procedure for allowing a
location and consideration for the two additional signs a
developer might request.
7. Other Criteria: Please give consideration to any other
criteria that might be appropriate in considering this
project.
�Q�
It appears that the City Council would like to proceed with this
concept for controlling and providing a beautification to temporary
advertising signs throughout the. community. It would be necessary
to provide some type of transition such as, requiring developers
to remove their temporary advertising signs and possibly provide 'a
free or reduced rent for the first year to off -set expenses. that
they have incurred in the ,construction of their temporary adver-
tising sign.
Again,please give
further assistance
tact my office and
either through our
tants.
City Administrator
this priority consideration. If you need
due to your departmental schedule, please con -
I will provide some administrative assistance
new intern or one of my Administrative Assis-
cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers
TLH/kf
lQ
a
0
<= Pt
j4SAFAR►oAKsI
HILLTOPPERS
Omen IhDMPSDP, LOS
40
a
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM HEDGES .
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIIAL, DALE PETERSON
FROM: ELMER A BORGSCHATZ
DATE: JUNE 12, 1986
BE: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY OWNED/STANDARDIZED
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In reference to memo dated April 4, 1986 we have gathered some information
that may be helpful to study a program which could be considered to eliminate
a problem relative to a reader board identification. I have been very much
impressed by the concept, however there may be some pitfalls as we will allude
to when we refer to the seven points set forth in your letter.
• 1. LOCATIONS - I would estimate that six reader boards are needed to cover
the present activity in the City. The developments are spread into most
areas of the City, however it may be difficult to lease six prime spots as
the use of right-of-ways would not be advisable.
2. SIZE - The attached sign detail by a reputable advertising company in
Eagan meets the recommendation of the. Council, however the all -steel sign
cost estimate also attached seems high.
3. COSTS - In accordance with estimates we have for an all steel constructed
sign with steel posts, removable (12" x 72" adv. panels) which would
include reflectorized panels would cost approximately $5,250 per unit.
The land use cost is estimated at $600 per unit. $100 maintenance cost
annually may be low.
Assuming a ten-year life expectancy of the all -steel sign, the following
® calculations indicate the projected income necessary to provide the
service:
To meet the annual costs which would be change of script:
3 @ $1,143, depreciation of $525, interest of $525, lease
Of site - $600 and $100 for maintenance for a total of
$2,893. A monthly rental fee of $33 per panel would be
necessary.
4. PRIORITY - It is suggested that the reader board be leased to the
applicants who have shown the greatest activity in number of units
processed in the preceding six months.
5. NUMBER OF SIGNS - We believe that signs should be uniform for aesthetic
values. At the moment, it would seem difficult to locate more than six
signs in strategic locations within the City. Six signs filled would
allow for 48 users and not knowing the acceptance by the industry, the
outlay of approximately $36,000 looks large.
6. LOCATION - It is our contention that location could be found for six good
spots. I believe Council and management could be a better judge of the
temporary advertising needs, hopefuLly the reader board would eliminate
part of the problem. /Q
7. OTHER CRITERIA - Space on the reader board on an annual basis, if renewals
are wanted, arrangements and fees should be made 30 days before
expiration. Vacancies do not destroy the effect of the board.
EB/js
•
----- ---1111r=aiiur--_----
FABRICATORS
DESIGNERS
�Jo
June 6, 1986
Mr. Elmer Borgschatz
City of Eagan
® 3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
•
-�,��sri�ence
h1c.
945 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE • 488.6711 • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551C
RE: Twin post directional signs
Dear Elmer:
To furnish and install a 161 tall twin post structure with
eight double faced directional panels as shown on Drawing
#86-R-193, our price to you is $4,737.00. For optional
reflective copy, add $512.00.
The following is a cost breakdown for your review:
Poles
Reflective
12" x 7211 D/F panels
Non -reflective
1211 x 72" DIF panels
Sincerely,
LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC.
Mike Gifford
MG:ds
Furnished
700.00
Installed Total
1300.00 2000.00
291.00 90.00 381.00
227.00 90.00 317.00
0
.TOP V IE W
o
J
1!
nflkss ftes
17,
AWN. PAVELS
AYDSQ. NBf!
0 0�0 CT002
ll lll'lLLi��l5001SC4J L�00
�
�OFUGTafBIED
Com' _ --
AYV µYD�IL
WNIiG
'
AA
DK. WmN2E'
FR6iT ViEw
4W �LLuy. ntiF� PriON D�f /
nkee��are
�Oe�te� II
r•B
1!
d
d
�
a
Agenda Information Memo
June 17,, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MINNESOTA BANK EAGAN
A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
for a Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at their May 27, 1986 meeting, to consider an application
submitted by the Minnesota Bank Eagan for a conditional use permit
to allow a pylon sign located on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial
3rd Addition. The APC is recommending approval, subject to condi-
tions set forth in the staff report. Enclosed on pages //3
through / is a copy of the Planning Department report as
• it pertains to this application. Also enclosed on page(s)//94#7
is a copy of the minutes from the APC meeting concerning this
item.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign along Yankee Doodle
Road in the Bicentennial Addition.
�/L
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PYLON SIGN
APPLICANT: MN BANK EAGAN
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: NB (UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT;
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting
a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a pylon sign located
on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition.
COMMENTS: In the initial review, the Planning Department has
determined that a Variance as well as a Conditional Use Permit
would be required in order to allow a pylon sign for Minnesota
Bank Eagan. Presently, there exists only 127' to the existing
standard pylon sign and approximately 225' to the existing Super
America sign. Therefore, any location elected for construction
of this sign on the Minnesota Bank Eagan site would be in violation
of the spacing requirement of the sign ordinance.
Minnesota Bank Eagan has come to the City because of the location
and visibility of the bank from Yankee Doodle Road. Representatives
of the bank feel a pylon sign would give much more visibility.
® They are requesting the Variance from the City in order to construct
the sign which would consist of approximately 95sq. ft. and
would have the Minnesota Bank Eagan logo plus an electronic
reader board which would display advertising plus time and tempera-
ture. The bank representatives feel that this pylon sign would
get the added' visibility they need to bring customers to this
branch bank facility.' If approved, the Conditional Use should
be subject to the following conditions:
1) Variance from the 300' spacing shall be required.
2) The sign square footage shall be 95 sq. ft. or what is attached
with the May 21 report.
3) Height shall be no more than 27' above ground level.
DCR/jj
//3
11] /�`__
NOOHSNIHE PM
.
FM
7
J Y
•aurt
�WMNI PMN
cI
i�� IQ¢
1 ®
of
ri
Fc
Q
"C r,
XVj OLfdR
OUNS oY�• 9¢
�
�., I4 i
L<uILF Q 141 ♦a/..f
0. br
C0.0,
L E
c c
'NLP.
-'pT 4' R-3
R-3
J:'�N
c Nn i 1FEss�
ryn�?Lom4O.
4 I y JNB
yB
y
OP j r 4
i nlocEl-P .�y"- - PD
JJJ NB. t.. I 30
;a ��NpFEr P bn / j LE
• I NCWXrs , I
F'xXs Reda 175.2 C JF ^� CSC I ...
Lc —JII I!
RLM 108 R i4
IF
1•ir,. % � I
l� 'I
16 (D Io .Vi
r�1R%
I� A, I P.p
•
•
I
6
6
Minneso aDD Y
Eagan
aL,,,q }Y •e v. f �•,I•� si` � ISS �
E ••• � �, � •• a �. • >.
���E• S•• • • • ••': Yir3/i �Ol ' � •Ci � y�
\\ YantM Doodle Road
ale EXISTING PYLON SIGN
PYLON SIGN PROPOSAL
Wer. M 4.r
'!Y
APC Minutes
.May 27, 1986
SIGN ORDINANCE — FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
TOWN CENTRE 70 a TOWN CENTRE 100
Chairperson McCrea opened the discussion requesting response from the
Commissioners in regard to the need to review the Sign Ordinance and proposed
amendments. City Planner Runkle introduced the information available
regarding other area communities and their sign ordinances, along with a rough
approximation of the maximum number of signs that could be allowed in the Town
Centre 70 area, assuming the platting of the property that would allow such
maximization. Discussion centered around whether a planned development could
be'used to handle variances from the sign ordinance. It was suggested that
the use of a planned development to allow variances from the sign ordinance
would open the floodgates upon the sign ordinance restrictions. It was also
argued that there are very few commercial planned developments in Eagan,
thereby minimizing the impact of using the PD Agreement as a means of
providing flexibility to the sign ordinance. The public hearing was.then
convened. Mr. Charles Bartholdi appeared on behalf of Federal Land Company
and indicated the willingness of Federal Land Company to enter into a Sign
Agreement whereby the number of signs in Town Centre 100 would be restricted
to 12 and the number of signs in Town Centre 70 to 16 signs. No one from the
general public was present in regard to this issue and the public hearing was
closed. After a lengthy discussion, Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the
motion to direct the staff to work out a Sign Agreement with Federal Land
Company whereby variances to the sign ordinance would be specified along with
the locations of the proposed signs. A legal opinion in regard to the'use of
sign agreements and/or planned developments in order to provide for variances
from the Sign Ordinance was requested. The agreement and opinion are to be
provided to the Planning Commission in time for its members to review them
prior to the meeting at which it is to be presented. All voted in favor.
MINNESOTA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a VARIANCE
The public hearing for a variance and conditional use permit for a pylon
sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition located in part of the
northeast quarter of Section 16, Yankee Doodle Road, west of. Pilot Knob Road,
was then convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle then described the
proposal and Mr. Mike Larkin appeared on behalf of the applicant. It was
indicated that the bank now lacked visibility on Yankee Doodle Road, due to
the development around it and that it was cooperating with the Amoco station
adjacent to it in order to maximize the distance between pylon signs along
Yankee Doodle Road, if a fourth pylon sign was to be allowed.
It was then suggested that the applicant's request be considered together
with the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move the existing pylon
sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition at the southeast
quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. Mr. Runkle .pointed out
that the Amoco Oil Company variance request was tied to two other variances
for the expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station located on Lot L,
Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition, and apparently impacted the need to move
the pylon sign for that location.
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard
to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from
setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station.
Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive
status in the area. Chairperson McCrea then ,convened the public hearing in
regard to the Amoco Oil:Company request fora variance to move an existing
pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public
hearing was closed.
Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for
two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the
public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed.
Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to
Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and
® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to
address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the
distance between signs would be asJollows: The distance between the Super
America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the
distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be
275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle
Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in
regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet.
2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level.
® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant,
being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the
Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping
sign and the Amoco sign.
4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE
Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move
an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition,
in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of
Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of
Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was
pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and
the Amoco station.
3
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Eight
VARIANCE TO MOVE PYLON SIGN/AMOCO OIL
B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign
Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition --A public
hearing was .held to consider a variance to move a pylon sign
that currently advertises the Amoco Oil station on Yankee Doodle
Road. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval
of the variance, subject to conditions set forth in the Planning
Department report. For a copy of the Planning Department report
which pertains to this agenda item and agenda item C of new busi-
ness, refer to pages through. For action that
was take by the APC, ref r to a copy of those minutes found on
• page(s) /Z j through /7_ (,, .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
variance to allow an existing pylon sign to be moved for .the
Amoco Oil Company.,
•
�� O
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR BLDG. SETBACK & VARIANCE FOR 20'
GREEN AREA ALONG A PUBLIC ROAD & A VARIANCE
TO MOVE A PYLON SIGN.
APPLICANT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY, JIM RABUSE
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: NB (.UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT;
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
® APPLICATION: An apDl catian leas 's�sa su;-.:fitted requesting 3
Variances; 2 relating _o :yailCiag C�siSn anc 1Variance to relocate
an existing pylon sign on Lo'- 1, Block 1: Bicz!ntennial 3rd Addition.
COMMENTS: Mr. Rabuse has met with the Planning Department a number
of times to see how he could provide additional service to his
customers by remodeling his existing station to provide one-stop
convenience shopping, along with gas, in order to compe`-e with other
facilities in the general area. Mr. Rabuse has submitted a revised
site plan which shows a remodeling or building addition to the east
of which the building would go to approximately 3' at the east
property line. The most easterly extension would be remodeled for
the car wash. The location of the existing car wash would be
converted for the convenience foods and in relocating the car wash
facility, the traffic circulation would be reversed from what it
presently is. Therefore, a widening of the driveway area on the
north property line would be required to get adequate stacking and
® circulation. The traffic would then go from the north to the south
through the car wash facility and out to access on 81st St. versus
Washington Dr.
Mr. Rabuse has contacted the adjacent property owners of which a
letter is attached with their submittal stating they have no problem
with the Variance encroachment on the east.
If the Variance is approved for the building expansion, then the
applicant is requesting to move the pylon sign which is presently
located in the northeast corner of the lot further west or closer to
the intersection of Washington Dr. and Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed
is a rendering of the sign which the applicant would construct if
the Variance is approved.
The variance should be subject to the following conditions:
1) Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department
for the remodeling.
2) All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to .
3) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20' green area.
/ZD
April 28, 1986
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Subject: Variance Request - Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third
Addition (Yankee Square Standard)
Dear Council Members:
• If approved, it is the purpose of this variance to allow
for the remodeling of the current existing structure to provide
for ancillary sales and interior convenience to and for the
motoring public. This request will enable Yankee Square Standard
to re -position itself to better serve the increasing needs and
wants of the customer and for the growth of the Eagan. community.
The following variance or variances are respectfully
requested:
1.) 0 -Zero Setback from the East property line to allow
for the addition of a Car Wash bay and the re-routing of
drive to allow for'ease of vehicle egress.
2.) 0 -Zero Setback from the North property line for
the re-routing of drive to allow for ease of vehicle ingress.
Respectfully,
W. J. Rabuse
Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
612/454-5522
�ww "e'-pluttm
April 21, 1986
Mr. N.J. Rabuse
Vice President
Y.F. Inc.
1424 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan AIN 55121
Dear Jim,
Minnesota National Bank of Eagan has no objection to a zero(0)
variance from the East property line for your building expansion
on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentenial Third Addition.
Please keep me advised as to your progress on this matter.
Yours truly,
MI`NE80TA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN
-17
M.E.Larkin
President
MII /lr
1-2,7-
Minnesota
2%i
Minnesota Nacional Hunk of Fagan 3900 Sihle% Memorial I liehYc:rc I:.I�d n. 1\11MUSOM 1512] (6I') -151-i'00
I
I&A
�i
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard
to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from
setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station.
Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive
status in the area. Chairperson' McCrea then convened the public hearing in
regard to the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move an existing
pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public
hearing was closed.
Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for
two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the
public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed.
Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to
Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and
® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to
address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the
distance between signs would be as follows: The distance between the Super
America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the
distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be
275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle
Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in
regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the
following conditions: .
1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet.
2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level.
® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant,
being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the
Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping
sign and the Amoco sign.
4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE
Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move
an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition,
in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of
Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of
Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was
pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and
the Amoco station.
/y5
3
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as
described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request.
Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES
Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements
for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station Located on Lot 1,
Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section
L6, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive,
Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two
variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: •
1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the
remodeling.
2. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20 foot green area. .
4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter
into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent
driveways.
All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no.
DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT •
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter
of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced
the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore
under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on
behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180
square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue.
Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an
area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council.
Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property.
All voted in favor. /
4
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Nine
/EXPANSION AND
C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard') from Setback Requirements
for Expansion and Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station ---A public
hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider
a variance for a building setback and a 20 foot green area along
Yankee Doodle Road for the expansion and remodeling of the Yankee
Square Standard gas station. The APC is recommending approval
of both variances as presented. For additional information on
this item, refer to the Planning Department report that was provided
as a part of the aforementioned agenda item B of New Business.
• For additional information on the action that was taken by .the
APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)�.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling
of the existing Yankee Square gas station.
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as
described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request.
Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES
Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements
for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 1,
Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section
16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive,
Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two
® variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions:
1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the
remodeling.
2. Ali other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20 foot green area. ..
4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter
into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent
driveways.
Ail voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no.
® DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter
of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced
the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore
under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on
behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180
square feet per 'face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue.
Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an
area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council.
Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50.per square foot.
3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property.
All voted in favor,
4
•
Agenda Information Memo
'June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Thirty
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN FOR DALLAS DEVELOPMENT
D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon
Sign for an Office/Warehouse--A public hearing was held by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held
on May 27, 1'986, to consider an application that was submitted
by the Dallas Development Company for a .conditional use permit
to allow a locational sign for their project. The APC is recom-
mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Department report, a copy if enclosed on pages /3d through
/:33 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy
of their minutes found on page(s) /9�/ .
ACTION, TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi-
tional use permit to allow a pylon sign for an office/warehouse
as presented by the Dallas Development Corporation.
iZ9
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
LOCATION: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 1ST ADDN. SEa, SEC. 18
EXISTING ZONING: LI - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Dallas
Development company requesting a Conditional Use permit to allow
a locational sign for the recently approved Dallas Development
1st Addition. This 103,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse is now
under full construction and is located west of Hwy. 13 and south
of Silver Bell Road.
COMMENTS: A Conditional Use Permit is required since the proposed
monument style sign is over 7'. The sign will have an interior
angle of 44" and both sides will be visible from Hwy. 13. The
intent was to create a sign that would "mirror" the style of
the building. This would be achieved by using similar materials
and rounded corners. The base of the sign (3.5' tall) will
be constructed of rock -faced concrete block and will contain
a planting area. The actual signage area will measure 22' at
• the base and form a half -circle. This area will be made of
6" horizontal cedar boards. The lettering will be interior
lighted and 8" tall.
The overall signage area will be approximately 180 sq.ft./side
and the height at the top of the sign will reach 12.5'. The
height is necessary since the sign is in a large parking island
and must be visable above the parked cars.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to
the following conditions:
1)
This
sign be the only
monument sign over 7' on the site.
2)
The
one-time sign
permit fee, of $2.50/sq.ft. of signage
area.
JS/jj
l�
l3l
m
ME PLAN
DATA
I" tAa W
m
ME PLAN
D
V
n1101111=I�I�I��ISI
�Yn!
SWI®Iplwy���l �I�I�SMO
awiem�nnn��unnn��®i�nn��s�nnnnam®
sw®ne_i nnnn����nnn���i�m�eo
•
SIGN PLAN
X33
APC Minutes
May 21, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as
described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request.
Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES
Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements
for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 10
Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section
16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive,
Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two
variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions:
1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the
remodeling.
2. Ail other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20 foot green area. .
4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter
into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent
driveways.
Ali voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no.
DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter
of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced
the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore
under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on
behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180
square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue.
Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an
area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council.
Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property.
All voted in favor. / 2
4
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -One
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EQUITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
MOTEC TRANSMISSION
E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motet
Transmission) for a Pylon Sign --A public healing was held by
the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting
heldon May 27, 1986, to consider a conditional use permit for
a pylon sign in the Barton McGray Addition as submitted by Equity
Construction/Motet Transmission. The APC is recommending approval
of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign. For additional
information on the item, refer to the Planning Department report;
a copy is enclosed on pages through /3P . /gpe- mi�utea� p.
In reviewing this application, i -t occurred to the City Administra-
tor that a conditional use permit for a pylon sign had been
applied for at .one time by Motec Transmission. That pylon sign
was denied. Since a variance is more than likely required to
the lineal footage distance between the Mediterranean Cruise
sign and the Motec sign that is proposed for the 'T.H.13 frontage,
additional information will be forthcoming with the Administrative
packet to better explain the variance and history of the sign
that was denied for Motec Transmission.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi-
tional use permit for a pylon sign for Equity Construction Company/
Motec Transmission.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: MOTEC TRANSMISSION CLINICS
LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: GB - GENERAL BUSINESS (NE;, SEC. 19)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM, PLANNER I
® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit t"o allow a pylon sign for Motec Transmission
Clinics on Lot 4, Block 1, of the Barton McGray Addition.
COMMENTS. All seven lots in this addition have frontage along
Cedarview Drive, a service -road for Cedarvale Blvd. Lot 2 (Sherwin
Williams Paint) and the Mediterranean Cruise :Restaurant, Lot
5, have pylon signs along this service road. They are approximately
400' apart. (See exhibit.) City Code requires 300 lineal ft.
between pylon signs on the same side of the street and a maximum
height of 27=.
The proposed sign is 20' tall, two -directional, interior -lighted
and has a signage area of 60 sq. ft. The applicant will locate
this sign along the northwest property line that abutts MnDOT
(Hwy. 13) right-of-way. The widest portion of the sign must
be kept 10' within the property line. No other pylon sign is
• being proposed along Cedarview Drive.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1)
Sign
placement as
approved by the City Council.
2)
The
one-time sign
fee of $2.,50/sq.ft.
JS/jj
1�6
13�
Ll
•
•
N IG�x l�aYy ra.
vwIr NIgw
E
city of Bogan
Department of Planning
i
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
MOTEC TRANSMISSION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in
part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner
Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied
some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was
poincea out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent
signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards
the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council.
2. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to
be 300 feet from any adjacent signs.
All voted in favor except Voracek who voted no.
R. K. SCHEURENBRAND — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the
request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on
approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road.
City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was
present and explained the .proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site
anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional
boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other
necessary licenses.
2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes
shall be adhered to.
3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time.
4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the
site without City Council approval.
5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor
control.
Ali voted in favor.
5
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Two
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/R. KAYE SCHEURENBRAND FOR BOARDING KENNEL
F. Conditional Use Permit/R. Kaye Scheurenbrand for a Commercial
Board Kennel --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at the May 27, 1986, meeting to consider a conditional
use permit.. application submitted by Kaye Scheurenbrand to allow
a temporary animal grooming, and kennel facility on 5,.81 acres
west of Highway 3. The Advisory Planning Commission is recom-
mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented.
For additional information, refer to the Planning Department
report; a copy is enclosed on pages/through / 6 . For action
that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes
found on page(s)1!�Z.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for a commercial boarding kennel as applied
for by Kaye Schuerenbrand.
/,416
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: KAYE SCHEURENBRAND
LOCATION: NE a, SECTION 36
EXISTING ZONING: A, AGRICULTURE
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20., 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a temporary animal grooming
and kennel facility on 5.81 acres west of Highway 3 in Section
36.
COMMENTS: The Code requires that a license to operate and maintain
a dog kennel be obtained from the City and that a Conditional
Use Permit be requiredfor kennels on 5+ Agricultural parcels.
The applicant intends to remodel an existing 3 -car garage into
a boarding kennel that contains 10 2' x 4' or 5 4' x 4' upper/lower
cages. In front of these cages are 2' x 10' exercise runs.
The application is temporary since the applicant wishes to construct
a permanent facility of approximately 4,000 sq. ft_ in the future
that may serve as the City Animal Pound. The City Animal Warden
has reviewed the submitted plan and it meets her approval.
® Several letters of recommendation have been included with the
application and 2 have been attached for your review.
Note. The applicant does not own theproperty at this time,
but has an option to buy subject to. the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit.
If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1) The applicant obtaining a City Kennel License and all other
necessary licenses.
2) A building permit be required for the remodeling and that
all Codes be adhered to.
3) The maximum number of animals not exceed 10 at one time.
4) No future building expansion or future building on the site
without City Council approval.
5) All animals be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and
odor control.
JS/jj
/�(L
0
E
22.46
TiF
-/�,
• -- • -
as
-.
Ll
2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811
June 1, 1983
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN
Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_
It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to
make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for
a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally
known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on
numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and
she has always been extremely cooperative.
Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture
and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize
any possible noise violation.
I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset
to your community as she has been to ours.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Robert A. Mood, Manager
Building and Inspection Division
cln
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
vl� my Of
000mington
2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811
June 1, 1983
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN
Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_
It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to
make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for
a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally
known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on
numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and
she has always been extremely cooperative.
Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture
and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize
any possible noise violation.
I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset
to your community as she has been to ours.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Robert A. Mood, Manager
Building and Inspection Division
cln
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
SOUTH HYLAND VETERINARY HOSPITAL
JAMES A. LIBBY. D.V.M.
BEVERLY MAINS. O.V.M. _
5600 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD
BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55437
■61-1!6•
October 1, 1984
City Council
Bloomington, Mn
I am writing on behalf of Kaye Scheurenbrand and am
pleased to recommend your approval of her proposed grooming
and boarding facility. I have known Kaye for over 14 years
and have a high regard for her ability to operate a clean,
sanitary, and professional facility. This should be a nice asset
to our community.
inz rely,
mes A. Libby D. .M.
•
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
MOTEC TRANSMISSION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in
part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner
Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied
some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was
pointed out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent
signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards
the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following
conditions:
® 1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to
be 300 feet from any adjacent signs.
Ail voted in favor except Voracek who voted no.
R. K. SCHEURENBRAND - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the
request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on
approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road.
City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was
present and explained the proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site
anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional
boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other
necessary licenses.
2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes
shall be adhered to.
3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time.
4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the
site without City Council approval.
5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor
control.
Ali voted in favor.
147
5
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Three
WAIVER OF PLAT/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE
G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life/Opus Corporation)
to Split Lot 18 and Combine N% of Lots 19 & 20, Creating a New
Four -Acre Parcel Located N of Lone Oak Road and W of Service
Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park --A public hearing was
held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on May 27, 1986, to consider a waiver of plat applica-
tion to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots 19 and 20, creating
a new four -acre lot in the Eagandale Industrial Park #1. The
Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the
application. For additional information on the item, refer
to the Planning and Engineering report which is enclosed on
pagesl�,f through /5y. For action that was taken by the APC,
refer td —those minutes found on page(;s)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat application as presented by the Opus Corporation/
Northwestern Mutual Life.
I f��
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE
LOCATION: LOTS 18-20, BLOCK 5, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PK..#
SEa, SECTION 3
EXISTING ZONING: L1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
® APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting
a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots
19 and 20, creating a new 4 ac lot in the Eagandale Industrial
Park #1. This lot is north of Lone Oak Road and has approximately
325' of frontage on West Service Road. Champion International
will abut this site to the NE. Northwestern Warehouse and a
45' railroad easement form the rear property line. As a result
of this Waiver, Lot 17 will be increased to a more .developable
3 -acre lot.
The newly formed lot will contain a one-story brick office/warehouse
built for National Business Systems. The submitted site plan
meets Code setback, lot coverage and parking requirements.
If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to:
® 1) A $.02/ft. Parks Dedication Fee.
2) A detailed landscape plan approved by staff prior to the
issuance of the building permit.
3) All other Code requirements.
JS/jj
#q
166
Ll
0
yC vVTC
43
EAGANDALE BUSINESSB.K.
1 l•. CAMPUS OS �.
McKEE
EAGANOALE CJOFFICEG
:ENTER "p..
pO s 3 GaG�? .
FIRS?�
T plLf
R •NEW 0O LOTI BLKI
HOLLAND Y",.. -Ir
21 DIVISION OF 15
SPERRV 14 17 ,'
ovsnEw RANDS
SIEVE H - $
BUSINESS
• �P 17
cEME D moN AMERICAN 45�J5� \02
10 FRUIT & 3� R p
PRODUCE 1'r ati�02P race.w.
SH �P
OUTLOT
n..c 14 u.c •y\ :� •A� F P ns.c
aF 19
...c 15 ' 19 •l6i �b OUTLOT 6
6 ..;x 7.:.. 1B Sr .c
A
.AL .26
..� 16
$ OU®LOTS
K
.r 17
10.
SS7� " 16 sor OUTL T3 OUTLOT4
..r
5
19 6 u]¢ ... 911 .or
6 1 E.0
es uu
o .c
au K
• LEMAY UNPLATD
UNPLATTED
LAKE a]I K
APARTMENTS
BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
K
EAG .N1?AI_E,CE: 'TER INi!Uoc\T
/ /'/\\ UCT. 19 /
\ YS
\ lOT IB
N
RIIAL SARK '-,_//i
I. I.r..... =jw.
11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic.
il
i
"'i
11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic.
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION
WAIVER OF PLAT
Chairperson McCrea next convened the public hearing in regard to the
application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a
waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20,
creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eaganaale Center Industrial Park,
Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section '3, north of Lone Oak Road
on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously
split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to
form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded
the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the
following conditions:
®
1.
There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication
fee.
2.
A detailed landscape plan shall be approved
by staff prior to the
issuance
of the building permit.
3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with.
4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and
drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the
Engineering report.
All voted in favor.
BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING
The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning
from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast
quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway
#55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the
application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the
City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth
Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property
had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St.
Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed
plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller
appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg
moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from
PD to R-1. All voted yea.
/'�3
I
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Four
REZONING FROM PD TO R-1/BUR OAK HILLS
H. Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD to R-1 for Approximately
111 Acres --An application was submitted by the Harsted Companies
to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development from
a PD to R-1 District. This application is a result of a require-
ment by the City Council when the preliminary plat was acted
on at the April 15, 1986, meeting. The APC is recommending
approval of the rezoning. For additional information on this
item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report;
a copy is enclosed on pages through /(e45 For a copy of
the APC minutes on this item, refer to page (s) //o/P
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from PD to R-1 for the Bur Oak Hills development.
/5�z
.CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING
APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES
LOCATION: Sz, SECTION 12
EXISTING ZONING: P.D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Harstad
Companies to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development
(PD 74-5) to a R-1 (Single Family) district.
The Preliminary Plat consisting of 205 lots on 111 acres was
approved subject to this rezoning on April 15, 1986.
The developer is in the process of completing final plat require-
ments.
JS/jj
•
J6el A
--
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES (BUR OAKS)
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE OF REPORT
REPORTED BY:
NE;, SE4, SA, SECTION 12
PD (SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS)
JANUARY 28, 1986
JANUARY 23, 1986
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED •
An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat
for 204 single family lots in the South Delaware Hills Planned
Development in Section 12.
ZONING & LAND USE
This 111 acre site abuts Inver Grove Heights to the east, highway
149 to the west, agricultural parcels and Bur Oaks Park to the
north with more PD land to the south. A preliminary plat for
this site was approved on September 18, 1979. All of the lots
are above the 12,000 s.f. minimum for an R-1 (single family)
classification and meet the 85' width at the setback line.
BACKGROUND/COMMENTS
There has been an issue as to whether this PD agreement is still •
valid. The City Attorney's office has verified that it is and
any deviation from the approved planned development preliminary
plat of 1979 will require another public. hearing. Therefore,
this plat will also require a rezoning to R-1 (single family).
The submitted preliminary plat shows extensive grading in areas
that were dedicated parkland in the previously approved plat.
As a result, the densly wooded hillside east of the ponding area
will be graded substantially.
The Parks and Recreation .Dept has briefly reviewed this site
and is opposed to it for, several reasons:
1) The wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be destroyed
by the proposed grading.
2) The area that includes the tennis courts has 3.1 slopes along
the western property line where typically 5.1.is needed for
practical use/maintenance.
3) The access into the park is only one.lot wide fronting Rolling
Hills Dr where the recommendations by the Parks Staff and
Consultant was for a four lot area.
- /55 -
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1985
PAGE 2
The Parks & Recreation Dept does not feel that there is suitable
reason to waiver from the previously submitted parkland dedication
requirements.
GRADING
The grading proposed by the applicant is feasible from an engineer-
ing standpoint. That is, it meets all City criteria for slopes
and grades with the exception of maintaining a 2% grade at inter-
sections. There are several intersections where this 20 grade is
exceeded. However, the applicant can revise the grading plan
to provide for the required 2% slopes for 100' at the intersections.
Because of the rugged topography, -there -are several areas on
® the applicant's grading plan showing 2:1 slopes. While these
slopes are within City Codes, they are very difficult to maintain
once permanent vegetation is established. Until that time,
these slopes are extremely susceptible to erosion. As a result,
the staff will recommend a detailed proposal from this applicant
as to how he proposes to control erosion on this site. Also,
staff recommends the applicant revise the grading plan at intersec-
tions where he does not achieve a 20 slope for 100' past the
intersection. Finally, because the applicant proposes to encroach
on Williams Brothers Pipeline easement for grading his site,
staff recommends the applicant obtain written authorization
from Williams Brothers Pipeline allowing them to perform the
necessary grading operations within Williams Brothers easement.
DRAINAGE
The proposed grading in this site will not change any of the
existing drainage patterns. This site is located within major
drainage district G as shown on Figure 1. All of this site
eventually ends up into Pond GP -1 (Burr Oak Pond).. A positive
outlet is in place for this pond which outlets to downstream
ponds that all have positive outlets to the Minnesota River
valley.
This development will be responsible for providing the necessary
ponding area for GP -1 and also for the portion of Pond GP -8,
located within this development.
This development will require the extension of trunk storm sewer
between Pond GP -8 and Pond GP -1. It also will require the extension
of trunk storm sewer from GP -1 southerly to its southern boundary.
If the applicant chooses to have this work performed under City
contract, then the City Council must authorize such a project
prior to final plat approval. If the developer chooses to install
City trunk storm sewer privately, then it will be at his own expense
because the City has no provisions to provide credits . for work
performed privately._
I5G
1
_BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
SANITARY SEWER
This proposed development is located within sanitary sewer subdis-
trict N -EE, as shown on Figure 2. The master plan proposes extending
a 12" sanitary sewer southerly through this development to pick
up the southerly most portion of subdistrict N -EE. However,
the U.P.S. Addition (about 40 acres in the northeast quarter
of the northeast quarter of Section 13) was diverted from sub-
district N -EE to subdistrict N -AA. Because of this, staff re-
evaluated the necessity of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line.
Staff's findings indicate that an 8" diameter sanitary sewer
line would be adequate to provide service to subdistrict N -EE,
thereby eliminating the necessity of any- trunk sanitary sewer
within this area.
This development will be responsible for extending sanitary
sewer to their eastern boundary at appropriate locations to
provide service to the area of this subdistrict located within
Inver Grove Heights. It also will be required to extend sanitary
sewer to its south boundary at an appropriate location and also
to the parcel just easterly of the panhandle adjacent Highway
55.
WATER MAIN
This development will be responsible for extending an 8" water
main from Highway 149 through this development to loop into
the water main within Chapel Lane. It also will be responsible
to stub water lines to its easterly and southerly boundaries
where appropriate.
STREETS
Trunk Highway 149 borders the westerly portion of this development.
77th Street abuts the easterly edge of this development. Trunk
Highway 149 is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department
of Transportation and is a rural two-lane highway. 77th Street
West is a rural roadway section under the jurisdiction. of Inver
Grove Heights.
With the exception of the two "bubbles" and the Rolling Hills
Circle cul-de-sac, staff agrees with the applicant's street
plans.
Staff recommends not approving the bubbles -for the following
reasons:
1. There is no access hardship. The applicant is merely trying
to obtain additional lots by using these bubbles.
2. The bubbles create a maintenance hardship and obstacle.
151
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 4
3. The large paved areas within
as children tend to play in
close to the through streets.
the bubbles create safety hazards
them and they are located too
4. Council has experienced problems in the past with developers
using the bubble only to obtain the necessary lot width
and requesting vacation of excess easement after the fact.
5. The bubble on lot 11 should be eliminated and accessed up
to the north for a future potential loop street through
this parcel. This will eventually connect to the Rolling
Hills Drive located within the panhandle.
Staff feels that the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac should
be eliminated because the only service it provides
additional lot or two. Lis for an
ot 1, Block 5 appears to be rather
small for a corner lot anyway.
The applicant will be responsible for constructing the temporary
turn around shown in Inver Grove Heights. Also, the applicant
will be responsible for the costs of connecting 77th Street
West in Inver Grove Heights to their proposed 77th Street West.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS
As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant shall
dedicate 60right-of-ways for all streets with 120' diameter
cul-de-sacs. The developer shall also be responsible for dedicat-
ing the southerly half of Rolling Hills Drive not shown on the
preliminary plat.
This development shall dedicate a 30' utility easement over
® all water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer not located within
city right-of-way. This development will also be responsible
for obtaining easements through the park property,' if required
by the Park Department, for utilities.
PERMITS
This development will be responsible for
permits: obtaining the necessary
1) MPGA sewer extension.
2) Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension.
3) MN Dot Access Permit.
Because this development will generate more than 50,000 gallons
per day of wastewater, the MPCA will require the preparation
of an EA4P. This EAW preparation will be the responsibility
of this developer. Staff recommends that no
be granted until the City receives all permits. final plat approval
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 5
ASSESSMENTS
In researching the City's assessment records, Staff has found
that this development is still responsible for trunk area water
main assessments, upgrading of trunk storm sewer area assessments
because of large lot credit, and trunk area storm sewer assessments
as indicated in the following summary table and as shown on
Figure 3.
(1) Includes 20o credit for streets
(2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid)
The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting
attherates in effect at that time.
CONDITIONS:
1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must
be approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be
obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their
easement.
3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure
that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8
to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions.
4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities
are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide
for future extensions for later developments.
/f��
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
TABLE
Est'd
1986
Description
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Trunk Area Water
70 Ac
$1,190/Ac
$83,300
Main (010-54,
011-04,010-79,
010-75,010-76,013-80)
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer 165,530 (1)
0.05/S.F.
8,276
(013-80)
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer 4.2 Ac
$1,353/Ac (2)
5,683
Upgrade (011-04)
-
Total
$97,259
(1) Includes 20o credit for streets
(2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid)
The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting
attherates in effect at that time.
CONDITIONS:
1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must
be approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be
obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their
easement.
3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure
that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8
to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions.
4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities
are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide
for future extensions for later developments.
/f��
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 6
5) This development shall insure that
through this plat from T.H. 149
within Chapel Ln. Extensions of
and south boundaries will also be
extensions.
an 8" watermain is looped
to the existing watermain
water lateral to the east
required for future service
6) The final plat shall be revised to eliminate the proposed
cul-de-sac (Rolling Hills Circle) in the SE corner, the half
cul-de-sac (Hillside Dr "bubb-le") in the SW corner & the
half cul-de-sac (Hillcrest Dr bubble") in the NE corner
shall be eliminated and replaced by a "stub" street for future
extension to the unplatted parcel south of T.H. 55. This
development shall be responsible for all costs associated
with connecting 77th St west to the existing street in Inver
Grove Heights.
7) The final plat shall provide for a permanent cul-de-sac in
160
the extreme northerly extension of Rolling Hills Dr with
•
platted right-of-way for a future westerly extension & ultimate
connection to Chapel Ln.
8)
All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of
Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 30'
easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located
within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility
easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part
of the final plat.
9)
All permits required by local, County, Regional & State Agencies
shall be acquired prior to final plat approval.
10)
This development shall be responsible for all the additional
assessments required with this- proposal as determined by
the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
•
11)
If public improvements are to be installed under City contract,
the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
160
HAIIGE, EIDE & F ELLER, P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PAUL M. HAUGE
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID G. KELLER
LORI M. BELLIN
MICHAEL J. MAYER
Mr. Dale Runkle
Eagan City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
3906 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122
January 16, 1986
Re: South Delaware Hills Planned Development
Dear Dale:
AREA CODE 612
TELEPHONE 4544224
You have asked me to clarify the developer's rights under the South Delaware
Hills Planned Development Agreement in regard to a preliminary plat being
proposed which is different from the preliminary plat approved September 18,
1979.
A Planned Development zone is not the equivalent of other zoning
classifications with specific code criteria for land use, density, setbacks,
parks, etc., other than as provided in the Planned Development Contract with
its various exhibits. Under Eagan City Code, a Planned Development
designation is a superimposed zoning designation (Section 11.20, Subd. 8)
which requires the developer to provide specific information to allow a
planned development which will better adapt itself to the physical and
aesthetic settings of surrounding land than does existing zoning and yet be
feasible for the owner and developer economically while benefiting the
community at large to a greater degree than development of underlying zoning.
Our files indicate that the Council has determined that the Planned
Development Agreement commenced September 18, 1979, the same date as the
approval of the preliminary plat for South Delaware Hills. The Planned
Development Agreement in our filesappears to contain an exhibit in
conformance with that proposed plat. Therefore, it is our opinion that any
substantial deviation from the planned development agreement and the
preliminary plat exhibit attached thereto would require Council approval and
trigger the public hearing process with the required mailed notices to
adjacent land owners. Substantial alterations would include changes in land
use, parks and extensive grading.
DGK:ras
cc: Thomas Hedges
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, EIDE 6 KELLER, P.A.
David G. Keller
C
E
C
J
0
0
a
3 r-
i
.. 1 ✓mil
+\�\\�v`����J 1 � j�� ',ll ,4 Lc•y . I� T_!� ! 'fr(_ �l�'/ 1 11�� '�. 11 ' ; ��� �.``
i�-.�5.�?�� ' � 4i•. � � lI �y� r �`T�J[ I K I �1.' I ��'�q � � � `F 4-� a - I •� �—I
y d �• •�. ♦ n 1 i' 7//��/ �.,!� /%� . ` d �\ a, -.y1 \\\ OWIFA 177
B OAK
UR HILLS
40EYELOPQI
• v t\ a -n y 111 ��• �, '� • > .-\ r, � , IIU ''�"��: ik �I E- ,:e+ 7 •n u.,a
ti I PRELIMINARY PLAT
� •L � \\\1�1 �.` �j/ /^w[ [[-i s " .` „� e"`��n` � /,,q,.- �1 <,�,.T',s\ .(1:.-'. �.`:...:w [.•.. ti
�- \ a 11 -. I � - /� / -moi � • ,c .
,\, � D �' � I F' � •r�\ �= I \ 1i> 1 � 1,, ',1., •II y `�' a q Ij 1 :` .... ..r+':
\I``\'f. \' •, - �,,�� .1 'r/4[[;a<�'
�JJ1�/�]11111 iX1 �!�FF''\ P\ .�.• _�j r' , i; r• �J1, 1 ,/ ` ,. � 1 �-.•" 1 o.rrs r...r.�- _ r
\\/� t 1 "� �' � //" / �L -�- ' .1 � \ � .'.� lyd ,: / 1 i.. z� � �! [ i I--=1' 'I_ I1 �.�-e•.' v..��.�...... ��
\ '\ [ I �'1 '� •'R4R,[ Aon ' //) -i a ."} " �— i o
- J• '. .1 a, � , -. • C i - / � qr 1 \ � � i14,(I y e I ; I,w, j1�- � �.¢ /
• _ \� �" �\� � If CI..[ i .[ :[tay'[ ��•I `J I l ��III111 '�"C ? j<(il �`9 _�.°.r" ..�.) [G�✓ �,..
VA v
--.---__—__--
y--
�� IL`;1�7•'�"_ e--'j-'��sF r 1' 71i f I r ' 1�� ' �J 4..1 i , p`\`f� ��} -1 _� ___
C _ n
'..so
i i-�,`a•�tA.
� �� .t ^ \.•� t � r/. `u( �:�/<� \r:) i ��. i� '^f' 01r-
•
1 •
City of eagan
r PUBLIC
$
117
WORKS
DEPARTME
829.0
856,0
f �I
� r\
V 77
0
B B0. \`
880
885.5
FP -9 8912
8870
890.0
P-8 I I
77.3
166.0
I IIS
'll
................
.... ............
.......... .. ....
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. #1
approved: standard
plate 4;.:
CFNTER�
_�X_zl
-CNE JK RCC
J
I i
-- -N-P Ir`Is I\
85
_I CE\TER IS I
18 Vr— ty
\
N-0,
I ORARY
M
fi
5
�\ N. - C C.,, l\
a� rc
a15
99
18 ..i
\'
\\ �
N - J J II
IA*** 15.,:, i N -EE
WESCOTr
c5E I i I I N -Z
GARDEN LOTS I \\I\
12 N -X 95 �\ _
l� �sN W I 13 \1 sski29„ N -
city of eagan
PUBLIC
$ I - WORKS
DEPARTF
M
` SUBJECT PARCEL
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
AA
•
FIG. #2
approved: standard
Plate #p:
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION
WAIVER OF PLAT
Chairperson McCrea next convened the public, hearing in regard to the
application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a
waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20,
creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eagandale Center Industrial Park,
Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 3, north of Lone Oak Road
on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously
split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to
form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded
the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the
following conditions:
• 1. There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication fee.
2. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by staff prior to the
issuance of the building permit.
3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with.
4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and
drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the
Engineering report.
All voted in favor.
BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING
The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning
from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast
quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway
#55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the
application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the
City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth
Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property
had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St.
Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed
plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller
appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg
moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from
PD to R-1. All voted yea.
*
i
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 198'6., City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Five
VARIANCE/RUSCON HOMES
I. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Side Yard Setback
Requirement for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition --An application
was submitted by Ruscon Homes for a side yard variance of approxi-
mately 2'' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the Park Ridge Addition. For
additional information on this item refer to the Planning Depart-
ment report, copies enclosed on page //e?.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance as presented by Ruscon Homes.
•
14,
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: RUSCON HOMES
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 4, PARK RIDGE ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
®APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
side yard variance of approximately 2' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the
Par', Ridge Addition. This is an existing house that fronts on [gest
End Trail.
The original survey and building location met all City setback
requirements and the building permit was issued on 8-23-83. In
mid-April 1986, the lot to the south was surveyed in order to locate
a fence. That is when the setbac:< error was discovered.
Apparently, the field stakes we•eshifted by one of the contractors.
The variance is requested to avoid any potential legal problems.
The distance between both homes is in excess of 21'.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable
ordinances.
0
40 4y
'q
I� ➢ I „ I��I'I
r a�5 ii ei' 0.• i)ofl
nz677uz w
(07.00 —
EXISTING
7 W
H
� I
O
VI
W
I
� � siL.T-[... � X57•-.r-C.••ty � Z
h�w�
Z -----------
rase
I� J I IiaN,•. �
<
c 0 K
TA.S. 9 TAM1
Z
1b.zo °5zo' �s' / 'e�
aa�'� i—�..—-----�
J� Cd -o, e•zz �5• � -�- _
y p:493. ct•5I IVE. �T
o— _ �. _ W inl7
�'
e
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 19186, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Six
SPECIAL PERMIT/GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT FOR MODEL HOME
J. Special Permit (Overbill Replat Grand Oaks Development)
to allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval --An application
was submitted for a special permit Grand Oaks Development request-
ing a Model Home prior to final plat approval. For additional
information on this item refer to the Planning Department. report
and a letter from the developer requesting the Model Home permit
• as referenced on pages / j) through.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
special permit application as requested by Grand Oaks Development.
167
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a special permit
to allow a building permit for a model home prior to final plat
approval.
The applicant desires this special permit due to the upcoming
"Parade of Homes" and the heavy final plat workload on City staff.
Attached is a letter explaining this hardship request in greater
detail.
The proposed home is a split entry and is 54' wide. No setback
variances will be required.
If approved the special permit shall be subject to the following:
® 1) This lot not receiving any setback variances
2) This model home not be sold for home occupancy until all
public utilities are connected.
3) This model home be the only model in this addition.
/,O
-"AKE FOI NTE
v
i
•
•R
.0
i I
�
=
vva I:Yu��
6
g� 7 B�j
8'
9
g•n LL�10 ��tr
Iyi'' ff.e
:e
Sy
Ra
9b
=:•�':�Y n%!
r
.e.FJ
'° •
`
L it ze 16 I .
^
S �
_ S+.
7 • a
15 B la 6.a 13
= 6• d. Jtl' •ate-.
.8
-i
_
to -
9
a.n
u17d
3
9
5
6.'Rr
.7
R•a
R'6
_18.
Id .-
it
C -
A ac
la
l�.an
. tee.,•,.
0,4
m
e�><
:± ~-
: na as
\ a3
law
rw
ter..;
\ a 5, t bo
• Via. - 'am.:^i.;'
>n--�.
_.r. _'
_
_
i
aA
__..v w._
o,•
,,,,a -
.'.��•a.ia.O.
a
\
.o ,
%'. 3m
='^
8
n
5
— __ _
ate.•
'�'t •�+. •8
a6
b ..
C—ORGINAGE
\I
( B UTILITY
ISI
EASEMENT PER PLAT, - 5
LOT 2
U
•
.I
03
I
r�,
I (947!)
500
CCtl III
PRO/SED 0
Q o I "./ MOUSE
19.0///
N
-J
8(D
2e.O I.
e
clj
d' I o(947.
I
N
GA/0)
F.
ry
I
I
!n
26.0
(9 7 IIII
4
a) o>
IoO SQA ;t1.N;' I
—J e
12.96 .� I 0 19u .D)
3T6'4 "E` 79.30 -
R=1884.29 D
4=2°24'41" l9
I,l HAY LAKE ROAD -
June 12, 1986 .
TO: Members of the Eagan Council
RE: Lot 2, Block 4 Overhill Replat Model Permit
Due to the extremely heavy back log of final plat proposals
is
submitted for spots on your agenda, we find ourselves in a very
precarious position.
The Minneapolis and St. Paul "Parade of Homes" (the largest
builder promotion of the year) will be held September 7-22, 1986.
Over 50% of our business for the following 12 months comes from that
Parade.
We respectfully request you grant a Model permit for our "Parade of
Homes" model. This will allow us to continue business and represent
the Eagan area with quality exhibits in the 1986-87 home market. Your
cooperation and understanding in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Thank you.
® Michael A. Parish
President
re s i den/�t/,/7�, -
"\ `'
Mare Montgomery
Vice -President
1881 Sunrise Court ECocn, MM 55122 (612) 452-0747
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Seven
GENERAL LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE
K_ 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance
Renewal --The City's General Liability and Workers Compensation
.Insurance expires on June 30, 1986. As previously stated, the Home
Insurance Company who is the present carrier of the City's
insurance, is no longer issuing municipal insurance coverage.
Therefore the City's insurance agent, Mr. Bruce Medvec of Valley
View Insurance, has researched other carriers and apparently the
• League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Plan is the best possible one
of only two alternatives available to the City. The Finance
Committee, at the direction of the City Council, met at noon on May
29 to discuss the City's insurance program with the Director of
Finance and City Administrator. At that meeting, Mr. Medvec
indicated that the quotes from the League of Minnesota Cities should
be available on approximately June 13 for review and consideration
on the June 17 meeting. The City has received the self-insured
workers com ensation quotation which is enclosed on pages /7/-
through for your review. Also attached is a copy of a League
of Minnesota Cities memo that discusses the self-insured workers
compensation program that was attached to the quotation offering.
Mr. Medvec has been assured that the general liability and
additional workers information will be available Friday afternoon;
however, the quotations will take time to review, therefore, final
quotes for both the workers compensation and general liability will
be sent out with the administrative packet on Monday. Mr. Medvec
will be present at the meeting on Tuesday for review and answering
40 questions. The memo that was submitted as a part of the last City
Council packet outlining the Finance Committee's meeting is again
enclosed on pages -L7-7- through -4ZE for your reference.
In the most recent Nation's Cities Weekly dated June 2, 1986, an
article appeared on insurance and apparently legislation is being
considered under the Risk Retention Act Amendments of 1986 that
would allow local units of government to establish risk retention
groups and to purchase liability insurance on a group basis.
Enclosed on page /1'9 is a copy of this article for your review.
This article is inf—or�Tational only.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a general
liability and workers compensation program for 1986/1987 to be
effective July 1, 1986.
/%3
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
Self -Insured Workers' Compensation Quotation
Plan Administrators:
Employee Benefit Administration Co.
6950 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 401
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
Telephone (612) 544-0311
Name of City:
Policy Period: From July 1. 1986 To July 1. 1987
Estimated Annual Premium:
Street and Road Construction
®Waterworks
Electric Power Co. & Steam Heating
Sewage Plant
Firemen (Not Volunteer)
Firemen (Volunteer)
Policemen
Store Risks Retail
Clerical Office
Building Operations
Restaurants and Bars
Pa rks
Street B, Sewer Cleaning, Snow Removal
Municipal Employees
0
Code
5506
7520
7539
7580
7706
7708
7720
8017
8810
9015
9079
9102
9402
9410
1986 Estimate
Manual
Experience Modification Factor
Standard Premium
Premium Discount
Discounted Standard Premium
LMCIT Discount 5 %
Net Deposit Premium
Rate
$9.35
6.68
4.36
4.68
12.93
31.53
5.63
1.60
.24
6.34
2.89
5.60
11.78
2.53
Estimated
Payroll
228.000
134.000
Deposit
Premium
30,456 POP* 9,603
961,000 54,104
641,000
24,000
266,000
34,000
592,000
1,538
1,522
14,896
4.005
14,978
130,915.
.79
103,422.
9,432.
93,990.
4.700.
.O
The foregoing quotation is fora deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. Your final,
actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your policy
year and will be subject to revisions in rate or experience modification. While you are a member
of the LMCIT Workers' Compensation Plan, you will be eligible to participate in distributions
from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings of the Trust.
/7el
EBA 441
Employee Benef-KAdministrat;on Co.
ent
s
l`
IIII llll
11 HilU
league of minnesota cities
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
SELF-INSURED WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The League of Minnesota Cities' workers' compensation program was
created as a means of lowering cities' workers' compensation costs. The
program is a joint self-insured program, and is offered through the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), a joint powers
entity. This self-insured program was designed for the League by
Employee Benefit Administration Co.
The prograin completed its sixth year of operation with over 500
participating cities, representing a standard premium volume of over
$8.0 million. The following table shows the program's past results.
Initial Discount Year -End Dividend Total Savings
1980 6p 25' 31`%
1981 15P 25% 40%
1982 18p 20% 38n
1933 18% 16% 34�a
The discount was 20% in 1984 and 10' in 1985; no dividends were returned
for these years. For 1986, the discount is 5`p.
HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS
Each city participating in the program deposits with the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust its workers' compensation deposit
premium for its policy year. This deposit premium is calculated using
standard manual rates with the applicable volume discounts and
experience modification, and discounting 5p from this figure. From
these deposits, LMCIT purchases reinsurance to protect the program from
catastrophic and abnormal claims; pays for administrative and loss
control services; and pays claims. The balance of the deposits and
reserves are invested, with the earnings accruing to the benefit of the
participants. After the close of the program year, surplus monies in
excess of appropriate reserves are returned to participants under a
formula taking into account the earnings and claims experience of the
Trust, as well as the loss records of individual participants.
ELIGIBILITY
All members of the League of Minnesota Cities are eligible to
participate. However, LMCIT may require a city with a poor loss recoru
to comply with specified safety practices as a condition of
participation.
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600
LJ
ADI•iINISTRATION
LIMCIT nas appointed Employee Benefit Administration Co. (E.B.A.) as
administrator of the program. E.B.A. also administers a similar pian
for the Minnesota School Boards Association and offers a fully qualified
staff in all areas of workers' compensation administration. The cost of
administration of the program is 101. of standard premium.
Services provided by the administrator include:
1. Determination of premium for participants.
2. On-site safety inspections and development of loss control program.
3. Claims processing, investigation and payment.
4. Legal counsel for disputed claims up to the Appeals Court trial.
5. Loss reports to individual participants and to LICIT.
6. Preparation of reports required by state autnorities.
REINSURANCE
To protect LMCIT from the adverse effects of catastrop!ric and abnormal
claims, LMCIT purchases reinsurance from two sources. The state 'Workers'
Compensation Reinsurance Association provides individual excess
coverage. This covers workers' compensation claims arising out of any
single occurrence which exceed $360,000. LMCIT also purchases aggregate
excess coverage to protect against the possibility that the total claims
will exceed the funds available.
ADVANTAGES OF THE PROGRAM
1. Lower operating costs. Conventional insurance carriers typically
allow between 30% and 40% of the premium dollar for administrative
costs. Tne total cost to LMCIT for administration, reinsurance, and
commissions is well under 20%.
® 2. Investment Income. Earnings on investments accrue to the benefit of
participants. Due to the long-term nature of certain workers'
compensation claims, substantial reserves are built up in the program.
These reserves, along with premium deposits, are invested; the
investment income further„_reduces the program costs.
3. Loss Control. A specialized approach to loss control provides
practical assistance in reducing losses.
4. [ion -profit. Since the LMCIT program is non-profit, all excess funds
are available for distribution to participants.
PARTICIPATIOL
This program is offered to cities through independent agents. For
further infomation, contact:
Employee Benefit Administration Co. League of Minnesota Cities
6950Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430 or 153 University Ave. E.
Minneapolis, M!'7 55426 St. Paul, fain. 55101
Phone: (612) 544-0311 Phone: (612) 227-5600
f 76
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 2, 1986
SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING FOR PURPOSE OF REVIEWING
CITY INSURANCE PROGRAM
A meeting of the Finance Committee was held at noon on May 29,
1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building. Present were its
Chairperson, City Councilmember Smith, City Councilmember Egan,
Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Intern Johannes
and the City Administrator. Also present was Bruce Medvec, the
City's insurance agent.
Mr. Medvec informed the Committee that Eagan has enjoyed to date
the equivalent of a full insurance coverage package for general
liability and worker's compensation. He reminded the Finance
Committee that the City has $1,000,000 of basic liability insurance
and a $2,000,000 umbrella providing a total coverage of $3,000,000.
Fortunately, the cost for a total coverage of $3,000,000 has been
extremely reasonable to the City in comparison to projection for
an equivalent package in the future. Bruce .spoke to the new
market that has developed in recent months stating that afford-
ability and availability are significant problems for municipal
insurance renewals. It is the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the
City not continue with an umbrella coverage due to the high
premium cost. For the City to be insured greater than the
$600,000 statutory amount, the cost for a premium would be in the
range of $80,000-$10'0,000 for $1,000,000 of additional umbrella
coverage. This past year, $2,000,000 of umbrella coverage cost
the City approximately $40,000.
It was also the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the City raise its
deductibles under the general liability portion of the insurance
package in an effort to target a savings of approximately $20,000.
It was the opinion of Bruce and the Finance Committee that the
City should budget any savings it might realize by raising the
deductibles therefore creating a special fund for the smaller
claims. Because of self-insuring and cities assuming more risk,
it is Bruce's opinion that our City may not experience any premium
increase over the 1985-1986 amounts. Mr. Medvec has submitted a
specification to the League of Minnesota Cities and is hopeful
that a quote will be returned prior to June 13 for review and
consideration at the June 17 meeting. The LMC insurance package
is about the only coverage available to municipalities at this
time. There is another insurance company that provides municipal
insurance; however, it is provided on an actual claim basis as
opposed to an occurence basis --the latter being more consistent
with Eagan's past practice.
The Finance Committee also discussed the necessity for increasing
the City of Eagan's awareness and activity in a more formalized
17,
risk management program. Mr. Medvec indicated that as the City's
insurance agent, a part of his service is to provide risk manage-
ment analysis for all departments. There were a number of topics
discussed such as:
* Coverage of Firefighters
* Safety Belt Law
* Safety Committee
* Police SWAT Team
* Engineering Design
* Employee Awareness
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:00
is the intention of the Finance Committee to meet
as a committee or by a teleconference call prior
is
17 City Council meeting for the purpose of examining
that is submitted by the League of Minnesota Cities.
and information will be provided as a part of the
packet with the June 17 agenda information.
Cit Administrator
TLH/kf
•
/70
p.m. and it
again either
to the June
the quotation
More detail
City Council
Nation's Cities Weekly June 2, 1986
i
request to cities as, well at approximately
the end of June. --
z .There has been some discussion in the
Senate of a proposal to include within the
1987 budget instructions ,or reconc lia-
tion legislation a provision requiring the
mandatory participation of all state and
local employees in the Medicare system.
Preliminary estimates of requiring all
state and local employees to participate
in Medicare indicate a total fiscal impact
to state and local governments of $8.3
billion over three years under such a
plan.
NLC strongly opposes any such pro-
posal.
LIABILITY INSURANCE
5.2129, the Risk Retention Act
Amendments of 1986 remains mired as
efforts continue to proceed to the Senate
floor for full Senate consideration. Spon-
sored by Sen. Bob Kasten (R-Wisc.), this
legislation, strongly supported by NLC, _
would facilitate the ability of state and
local units of government to establish
risk retention groups and to purchase
liability insurance on a group basis.
NLC recently sent a letter to 19 of the
top insurance executives in the country
urging them to work more closely with
NLC in expediting Senate consideration
of this legislation. Industry opposition to
the legislation has intensified as a num-
ber of amendments have been offered
Which would significantly impair the
ability of groups to form and operate
under the Act. _
House risk retention bills—
H.R.4301—Rep. Ron Wyden (D -Ore.);
H.R. 4442—Rep. Norman Lent (R-N.Y.);
and H.R. 4506—Rep. John LaFalce (D-
N.Y.) are bottled up in the House Energy
and Commerce Subcommittee on Com-
merce, Transportation, and Tourism un-
der Chairman James Florio (D-N.J.). Ef-
forts continue to expedite subcommittee,
full committee, and full House consider-
ation.
Insurance reform legislation offered by
Rep. John LaFalce (D-N.Y.) awaits com-
mittee consideration. Sen. Paul Simon
(D -Ill.) is expected to offer similar Senate
legislation in the near future. ❑
This report was compiled by NLC's Office
of Federal Relations under the direction of
its director, Frank Shafroth, and assisted by
,staff, members Carol Kocheisen, Reggie
Todd, Cynthia Pols, Victor A. Rojas and
Leslie A. Wollack. ,
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Eight
KEEPING OF HORSES/FRED DELOSH
A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses
on Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh--Mr.
Fred DeLosh has resided at 2'8'82 Sibley Highway since 1946.,
For a number of years he was allowed to keep and board horses
on his property. His property was zoned agricultural; however,
in recent years was rezoned from A-1 to R-1 by the City. Since
Mr. DeLosh has not boarded horses in recent years, the property
is :now zoned R-1, he is questioning whether he can have some
type of permit that would allow him to market and sell the property
with the usable stable and approval to board horses on his 14
acres. Enclosed on pages jf/ through /S13 is a copy of a
letter from Mr. DeLosh and aerial photo that shows the outline
of his property.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide some direction
to the City staff and Mr. DeLosh concerning his request.
2882 Sibley Hwy.
Eagan Mn. 55121
May 27, 1986
Mr. Dale Runkle �—
City Planner
Eagan, Mn.
Dear Mr. Runkle,
Our family has owned and resided on our 14 acres off
Hwy. 13 in north Eagan since 1946. The acreage was zoned agri-
cultural but, in one of our occupational absences out of state,
was rezoned R=1 without our knowledge. We have never attempted
to return it to agricultural status.
• We had horses for many years and built a stable to house
them. This stable has been kept in good shape and is very use-
able.
The purpose of this letter is to ascertain that horses
can again be kept on *he property even though it is zoned R-1
at present. This determination is especially important to our
children, as heirs, and to us in the event that we sell said
property,
Here are some pertinent bits of information -- The stable
is located out of sight in the bottom of a deep ravine. The
ravine is heavily wooded and has a small spring fed creek flowing
through it.
® The adjoining area Is sparsely settled with Highview Park
on the east boundary of the property. I believe that approximately
two thirds of affected adjoining property owners resided there
when we kept horses.
I am enclosing an aerial photo of the area and a topographic
map to assist you and the council in its deliberations. Please
return them to me._
A prompt decision would be deeply appreciated.
Very t my yours,
Fred De Losh
/q/
PA
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Nine
RESOLUTION/AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE
B. Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee -
At a recent meeting of the Airport Noise Committee a resolution
was adopted opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at Minneapolis. -
St. Paul International Airport. The Commission is recommending
that the City Council approve the resolution referenced on pages
_/f5 through /QZ:. .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
resolution opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at the Minneapolis -
St. Paul International Airport.
r,
CITY OF EAGAN _
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE EXTENSION,
OF RUNWAY 4/22 AT MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is
proposing the extension of Runway 4/22at the Minneapolis -:St.
Paul International Airport for the purpose of increasing the
capacity of the preferential runway system configurations, and
WHEREAS, the MAC has proposed as an integral ,part of such
an extension a southerly turn procedure for a significant
proportion of the air traffic departing Runway 22, and
WHEREAS, the MAC has asserted but has not conclusively
proven the benefit of such southerly-tu-rn-to-thezesidents of
Bloomington and Richfield most affected by the runway extension,
and
WHEREAS, the headings suggested by the MAC for such a.
procedure would approach 170 degrees, and
WHEREAS, aircraft using such headings and diverting from
them will tend to overfly large portions of the City of Eagan at
altitudes well below and at frequencies well above those
currently experienced by the community, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has aggressively planned for
noise compatible land uses where it has anticipated the presence
of aircraft overflights, and
WHEREAS, such land uses are not existent or planned in the
areas to be most severely impacted by the addition of a.southerly
heading.procedure from Runway 22, and
WHEREAS, the Eagan -Mendota Heights boundary currently
absorbs about one-half of all arrivals and departures at MSP and
the addition of more low -altitude overflights will add further to
this disproportionate impact and place an undue burden on the
area, and
WHEREAS, the extension of Runway 4/22 has the potential to
increase the operational• capacity of Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport by allowing departures to the southwest
without minimizing the capacity for departures over south
Minneapolis,
'NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan
opposes the Runway 4/22 extension as currently proposed including
the southerly turn procedure and that the MAC not proceed with
plans for its implementation, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan insist that
the MAC, in carrying out its noise abatement strategy to
concentrate the most noise on the fewest people, acknowledge that
such noise is an adverse environmental impact resulting from the
conduct of airport business and that the MAC adopt a policy of
conducting Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact
Statements for procedural changes as well as capital improvements
so that objective standards of proof and public process may
supplant presumptions of costs and benefits in MAC decisions
affecting airport neighbors, and—....
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City of Eagan requests that the
MAC, through its EIS process, study fully the projected impacts
of the Runway 4/22 extension and the southerly turn -procedure as
separate and unique changes with separate and unique impacts such
that their costs and benefits not be comingled or misunderstood
and that the MAC recognize as invalid for comparison those data
compiled during the two year test of the Burnsville Turn since
such information was gathered using take -off points and flight
tracks unique from those currently proposed.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
BY:
Its Mayor
ATTEST:
Its Clerk
Motion by:
Seconded by: r
Those in Favor:
Those Opposed:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan,
Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled
on this day of , 1986.
E -.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
/ �4 2
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
Item 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott
Road) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received
for the upgrading. of Wescott Roadf om Lexington Avenue to one-half
mile east. Enclosed on page/? is a tabulation of the bids
received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the Engi-
neer's Estimate contained in the feasibility report presented
at the public hearing held on March 19, 1986. All bids will
be checked for accuracy with a formal bid award recommendation
being provided by the Public Works Director at the Council meeting
on June 17.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-13 (Wescott Road') and award the contract to the
lowest., responsible bidder.
/d ,
Our File No. 49381
WESCOTT ROAD
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
M.S.A_.P. NO. 195-106-04
CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-13
CITY PROJECT NO. 467
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986
NO
CONTRACTORS
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Northdale Construction
$456,053.50
2. Ceca Utilities
460,429.70
3. Lake Area Utility
472,406.33
®
4. GL Contracting
516,209.20
Engineer's Estimate ----------------
$427,000.00
Feasibility Report Est.
492„330.00
% Over Engineer's Estimate
+6.8%
o Under Feasibility Report Estimate
-7.4%
NO
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 19&6, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -One
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued)
Item 2. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids Award Contract (Eagandale
Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13,
formal bids were received for the installation of streets and
utilities to service the proposed Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addi-
tion. Enclosed on pageJCd is a tabulation of the bids received
showing the relationship of the low bid the Engineer's Estimate
contained in the feasibility report presented at the public
hearing held on May 20, 1986. All bids will be checkedfor
accuracy with the formal bid award recommendation being provided
by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 Council meeting.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-16 (Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) and award
the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
•
•
Our File No. 49390
CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-16
EAGAANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 474
FOR
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CONTRACTORS
1. 0.& P Contracting
2. Lake Area Utility
3. Northdale Construction
4. Nodland Associates
5. G.L. Contracting
6. L & G Rehbein
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -----------------
Feasibility Report Estimate
% Over Engineer's Estimate
8 Under Feasibility Report Estimate
/90
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C_D.S.T.
BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986
TOTAL BASE BID
$215,684.85
219,307.30
222,458.50
232,498.00
237,273.76
243,439.50
$210,000.00
233,900.00
+2.7%
-7.8%
Agenda InformationMemo,
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -Two
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (.continued)
Item 3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract ('Sperry
Consolidation Facility) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal
bids were received for the installation of internal access roads
and utilities to service the proposed Sperry consolidation facility
to be financed by tax increment funds. Enclosed on page /q7/ is a
tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the
low bidder to the Engineer's Estimate. Due to the fact that this
is financed through tax increment funds, there was no formal
feasibility report estimate prepared. All bids will be checked
for accuracy and a recommendation for formal contract award will
® be provided by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract '86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility) and award the con-
tract to the lowest responsible bidder.
A
/V
CITY OF EAGAN
Bid Opening
PROJECT: Sperry Consolidation Facility
Utility and Street Improvements
City Contract No. 86-17
BID DATE: Friday, June 13, 1986'
BID TIME: 11:00 A.M. C.S.T.
Name of Bidder Total Base Bid
is 1. Northdale Construction $448,234.05
2. Ceca Utilities 450,195.00
3. G.L. Contracting 508,788.90
4. J. P. Norex, Inc. 530,111.99
5. Nodland Construction 552,046.50
Engineer's Estimate---------------- $471,534.75
% Under Engineer's_Estimate -5 %
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -Three
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued)
Item 4. Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for
Bids (Daniel Drive) --Contract 86-18 provides for the upgrading
of Daniel Drive with streets and utilities under Project 475
as necessary to service the proposed Northview Meadows 2nd Addi-
tion. This project was approved at a public hearing held on
June 17.
This contract also incorporates the trunk watermain installation
interconnecting the City's high and intermediate pressure zones
through the proposed Rahncliff 1st Addition under Project 468.
Because there are no assessments associated with this trunk
water installation, there was no formal public hearing. However,
®
the feasibility report was presented to the Council for their
review and approval at the May 21 Council meeting.
•
All easements necessary for the installation of these proposed
improvements will be dedicated with the respective subdivisions
which are anticipated to be completed prior to formal contract
award.
Our consulting engineer and Director of Public Works will be
available to discuss the details associated with these proposed
improvements at the June 17 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and order advertisement for a
bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on June 27, 1986.
/93
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -Four
5 YEAR COUNTY HIGHWAY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
D. Five Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects --Very
shortly, Dakota County will be reviewing and updating their Five -
Year CIP for highway improvements. They have requested each
community to review their ,previously approved Five -Year CIP to
reaffirm the proposed schedule and to identify any additional
projected county improvements that may be required that have
not been previously identified or included. Enclosed on pages
iqs through -96 is the county Five -Year CIP, identifying
both the existing scheduled improvements (Part A) and additional
needs anticipated by proposed future development and population
growth.. With the county wanting to establish a firm program
of future county road improvements for proper advance planning,
they want to be assured that the City agrees with the schedule
and is willing to commit its resources to make these joint projects
a reality.
At the May 21 Council meeting,, the Council directed staff to
evaluate potential future signalization needs th-roughout the
city. Enclosed on page '`'`F is a map of the city showing existing
signals and future signals. All of the future signals have been
identified on the county Five -Year CIP program previously discussed.
Several of these signals will be installed as a part of the related
county road improvement and others would be by separate contract
installation.
The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further
detail any questions regarding any of the information presented
under this item at the June 17 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
request for county road improvements.
i9�z
Prepare a Five -Year CIP
•
®
DAKOTA COUNTY
HIGHWAY
5 YEAR C.I.P.
A. SCHEDULED
EST. CITY
YEAR
CO. RD.
NAME
LOCATION
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
COST
1986•
26
Lone Oak Road
at Lexington Avenue
Signal
25,000
1986
28
Yankee Doodle
T.H. 13 to Federal Dr.
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
900,000
1986
28
Yankee Doodle
I -35E to Lexington
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
762,000
1986
32
Cliff Road
T.H. 3 to Inver Grove
2 Lane
Grading & Base
28,000
--=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heights
1987
31
Pilot Knob
I -35E to Rebecca Lane
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
1,650,000
1987
32
Cliff Road
Pilot Knob to Johnny
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
650,000
Cake
1987
32
Cliff Road
T.H. 3 to Inver Grove
2 Lane
Paving
11,000
Heights
v` 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32
Cliff Road
at Rahn Road
Signal
75,000
1988
26
Lone Oak
at Eagandale Blvd
Signal
75,000
1988
32
Cliff Road
at Blackhawk/Galaxie
Signal
40,000
1988
43
Lexington Ave.
Yankee Doodle to Diffley
4 Lane
Reconstruction
840,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1989
26
Lone Oak
Lexington to T.H. 55
4 Lane
Reconstruction
525,000
1989
30
Diffley
Pilot Knob to I -35E.
4 Lane
Reconstruction
575,000
1989
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30
Diffley
at Blackhawk
Signal
40,000
1990
31
Pilot Knob
Rebecca to Apple Valley
4 Lane
Reconstruction
450,000
5 YEAR
SUBTOTAL
$6,646,000
*Delay
Proposed by
County to Later Year
B. ADDITIONAL NEEDS
EST.
EST. CITY
YEAR
CO. RD.
NAME
LOCATION
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
COST
1987
28
Yankee Doodle
at Denmark
Signal
40,000
1987
31
Pilot Knob
at Duckwood
Signal
50,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1988
28
Yankee Doodle
Lexington to T.H. 149
4 Lane Reconstruction
850,000
1988
31
Pilot Knob
at Corporate Center Dr.
Signal
60,000
1988
31
Pilot Knob
at I-494 Ramps
Signal
10,000
1988------
31------
Pilot
at Towerview Rd.
Signal
50,000
�bl�l
-Knob ---
1989
31
Pilot Knob
at Deerwood
Signal
45,000
1991
30
Diffley
at Lexington Avenue
Signal
50,000
1991
30
Diffley
at Daniel Drive
Signal
50,000
1991
30
Diffley
Lexington to T.H. 3
4 Lane Reconstruction
1,300,000
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL
$2,505,000
GRAND TOTAL 5 YEAR NEEDS $9,151,000
0
77IAsv&ng
A
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 13, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION
At our Management By Objectives session held this past winter,
there was a brief discussion regarding future reorganization
within the Fire Department that would provide for full-time
administration. With the recent announcement by Bob Childers
that he is retiring, effective July 6, as the volunteer Fire
Chief, it is timely that an organizational review and budget
.analysis be provided for consideration later this summer when
the 1987 budget is developed. A memo was prepared, a copy is
enclosed on pages ?0/ through 70Y ,that formally notifies
the Fire Department that organizational changes to the Fire
Administration will be given consideration this summer, during
the development of the 1987 budget.
VARIANCE APPLICATIONS
Recently there has been discussion at City Council meetings concern-
ing the number of variances that are processed for building
construction within the community. Approximately every other
meeting the City Council receives one or two variance requests
and there has been a growing philosophy that variances be dis-
couraged, if at all possible, by the City staff. City staff
has typically and will continue to discourage variances and even
work closer with builders and developers to emphasize that variances
are 'for hardships and there is a .reason why a plat is approved
with certain lot sizes and dimensions. I asked Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein to research the number of variances for
residential permits that have been issued over the last 4-5 years
and determine what that relationship is to the number of permits
issued. Because Eagan is one of the leading communities in the
state in terms of building construction and activity there will
obviously be more variances. Enclosed on page 203 is a copy
of a memo that provides a table illustrating the number of variances
and the relationship to residential permits and some additional
comments about the staff's review of variances. The City
Administrator has sent a letter to all developers and builders
discourag-in,q the use of variances, which is also attached on
page/ 20
PARK BENCHES
You will notice that two (2) park benches have been installed
in front of the Municipal Building. Approximately thirty-five
of these benches are being placed throughout various parks within
our community. Our Park Maintenance Division is pouring the
concrete and constructing the park benches.
/W
AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE
At the May _21 City Council meeting, Mayor Blomquist informed
the City Council that a meeting had been held with the admini-
strative staff from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
and Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant. The purpose of the meeting
was to create an informational network to review odor problems
that are emitted from the Seneca (Plant and further to review
with the MWCC a program to minimize those odors and improve air
quality over the 'western part of our,community. As Mayor Blomquist
indicated at that City Council meeting, if you have names of
persons who are residing in the west side of Eagan who might
be interested in serving on this informal air quality task force
please let this office know and they will be, invited to committee
meetings. Attached is a copy of a press release that was prepared
by the MWCC regarding the Air Quality Task Forced .The first
meeting was held at 4:30 p.m. yesterday and several concerned
citizens who were made aware of this meeting did attend. The
next meeting is scheduled for 7:00 'p.m., July 17, at which time
a tour of the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant will be conducted
for those residents attending the Ai'r Quality Task Force meeting.
Members of the Council are certainly welcome to attend and will
be kept advised of any and all meetings. Attached on page 4p
is a copy.of a list of names of those persons who were in attendance
at the Task Force meeting.
NATURAL GAS FIRE DEMONSTRATION
Enclosed on page M 1 is correspondence from People's Natural
Gas regarding a Nat ral Gas fire demonstration that will be
sponsored by their company on June 24.. The Eagan Fire Department
will be participating.
MAY REPORT FOR PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
Enclosed on pages W ff through Q/O is a copy of the May report
for Protective Inspections.
CORRESPONENCE/MRS. DON SANDBERG
Enclosed on pages 2// through y/7i is correspondence from Mrs.
Don Sandberg regarding an interest in selling their property
to the City for passive/active parkland. The letterwill be
sent to the Parks and Recreation Director for Commission review:
CORRESPONDENCE/ROBERT FERGUSON
Enclosed is a letter to Mayor Blomquist from Bob Ferguson, Principal
of Northview Elementary Schoold, ;commending the Eagan Police
Department and Officer Larry Billmeyer for the bicycle safety
program.
CORRESPONDENCE/APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Enclosed is a copy of a letter to Fire Chief Childers and copied
to the City Council from the City of Apple Valley, thanking the
Fire Department for a recent mutual aid call. P. Z/f,,
SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY PLANTS
Enclosed on pages Al,`5, through z/ is a copy of a press release
from the Metropolitan Council regarding an update on the solid
waste resource recovery plants that are currently being planned
by Twin City area counties. Action that was taken by Dakota
county for their waste energy plant is discussed in this article._
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM OPERATION
Enclosed is a letter from ,a representative of Blue Bell Ice
Cream Inc., asking for reconsideration by the City Council to
allow the ice cream men/women to sell ice cream from a truck
throughout neighborhoods in the City of Eagan during summer months.
If the City Council is interested in changing the ordinance,
copies of the correspondence that was rovided by Blue Bell can
be made available for your. review. A, i d 4Lzi
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
40
M
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT IiOHENSTEIN
DATE: JUNE 10, 1986
SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION CONCERNING VARIANCE APPLICATIONS
Pursuant to your request, I have compiled data for the last
five -and -one-half years which consider variance requests as a
function of the residential permits which might give rise to them.
As you can see by the table which is shown below, variance
requests have remained a relatively stable three to four percent
of the R-1, R-2 and R-3 building permit totals over the past
several years. While not all of ,these variances were granted, a.
sizable number of them were approved based on their own merits. It
appears that a certain percentage of the residential building
activity will result in circumstances for which individuals will •
request variances and the current) number of requests is a result
of the phenomenal growth level we are experiencing.
1981 198 .,2 1983 1984 19:85 1986 YTD
RESIDENTIAL PERMITS 358 392 .659 789 855 469
(R-1, R-2, R-3)
VARIANCE REQUESTS 16 10 18 31 24 15
REQUESTS AS PERCENT 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03
OF REQUESTS
In addition, the protective inspections department indicates that
an average of five to ten potential variance situations per month •
are recognized and corrected at' the plan check or foundation
permit stage. This means that roughly seventy-five percent of the
potential variance requests are caught and corrected without requir-
ing a formal variance application.
A letter has been prepared for the City Administrator's signature
which requests additional attention to this matter on the part of
developers and builders. Hopefully this will reduce the number of
variance requests still further.
A inistrative Assistant
JH/mc
zo3
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P,0. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE, (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
June 11, 1986.JAMES A. SMITH
VAC ELLSON
THEODORE WACHTER
Coun ll Members
THOMAS HEDGES
s CIN P minislralor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
The City of Eagan continues to experience an exceptional leveiler,0f
growth in both its residential and business communities. Last
year, the City had the most building permits of any city in the
state. This year we are ahead of that pace. The City intends to
continue to foster positive development, but the City Council has
expressed concern about two specific side-effects of this growth.
1. Variances. - The City continues to receive a number of
variance requests which do not represent true hardships
justifying such action. Most often, they result from
oversights in the survey or design of a project or an
attempt to maximize floor area on a limited lot size.
The Council has issued a strong statement that it does
not support variances of convenience and that the condi-
tions which give rise to such requests should be antici-
pated and corrected ahead of time. Variances exist to
allow flexibility for demonstrated hardships.
2. Weed Control - City ordinance requires that weeds/grass
not be allowed to grow higher than 12" in height, or have
gone to seed or are about to go to seed upon any platted
or residential lot. It is the duty of the owner to
remove or cut such weeds. The City has received an
alarming number of complaints this year regarding weeds
on vacant lots and asks that developers keep these areas
in suitable, maintained conditions.
The City Council and staff would appreciate your continued atten-
tion to these matters. We enjoy a high degree of quality develop-
ment and the little extra work on such details helps preserve the
quality of the whole community. If you have any questions on
these issues please feel free to contact the City staff.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/mc
ao�Z
THE LONE OAK TREE . THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
r.rt
MEMO TO: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 10, 1986
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR CHANGES IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION
Since May 30 when you unofficially announced your retirement from
the EaganVolunteer Fire Department and then more formally in a
letter received yesterday, it became appropriate to consider
alternatives for the future structure of our fire administration.
As you recall, at our late winter management by objectives
session, there was discussion by the City Council regarding the
hiring of full-time, Fire personnel. Positions that were
discussed at that time included a IFire Chief and/or Fire Marshal.
There was no formal consideration; however, it'was generally
agreed that during the development of the 1987 budget there would
be some consideration given to full-time administrative staffing
in the Fire Department.
The Fire Department is caught in the world of complexities such
as administrative practices, insurance liabilities, facility and. .
manpower planning and all the other considerations that must be
given to a growth community. Our part-time Fire Marshal is no
longer able to monitor all commercial, industrial and multifamily
buildings throughout the City for proper fire prevention or
thoroughly review all fires that occur within the City during the
calendar year. Demands are increasing with all facets of fire
administration as the community grows.
I applaud you and your officers for the time and commitment you
have given to our Volunteer Fire, Department. Any consideration
and review of full-time staffing should only reflect the •
preservation of continuing a job well done and an effort to meet
the demands of the future.
It is my understanding that District Chief Schindeldecker is
considered your assistant chief and will be acting in the
capacity of Fire Chief upon your official retirement July 6. It
is also my understanding that traditionally the volunteer Fire
Chief is elected by the Department and those elections are held
in November/December every three (3) years. Recognizing that we
are currently in a transition between your administration and a
new volunteer Fire Chief, it seems appropriate by the City
Council and this office that the City exp.lore all staffing
options and review as a part of'the 1987,budget preparation,
alternatives that might best suit the Volunteer Fire Department
as we consider our future administrative staffing in that
department.
It is my intention to survey otherjcommunities of comparable size
and ask how their fire administration and fire marshal services
'201
a
are staffed within their departments. A report will be prepared
and input provided by your administrative officers during the
month of July as budget considerations are furthur developed for
review and.consideration by the City Council.
Reorganization and change are two of the most feared words in the
English vocabulary. Please stress to your fire administration
that an organizational review for the future is no reflection on
their capability as officers of the Fire Department. It is
actually to the contrary and considered to be of a support nature
to the Fire Department by the mere fact that the City Council may
determine that full-time staffing is necessary in order, to
continue and improve upon a level of service that to date has
been provided by the volunteerism of our department.
I will stay in touch with you, and certainly after July 6 with
Dick, relating to the future of the fire administrative staff.
Please remember that the City Council has had only a brief
discussion at a management by objectives session and as a
® collective body has not had any deliberations or discussion
regarding future administrative staffing of the Fire Department.
All the information that this office will compile is considered
fact finding and will be presented in a report form.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time.
r
Sincerely,
1vZ61 . d
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Honorable Mayor S City Councilmembers
Dick Schindeldecker, Assistant Fire Chief/District Chief
Ken Southorn, District Chief
TLH/kf
ROUGH DRAFT
PRESS RELEASE
EAGAN AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE
METROPOLITAN NTE CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF EAGAN
FORM AIR Q`11ALITY TASK FORCE
ST. PAUL, June 9, 1986 -- The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
(MWCC) and the City of Eagan have announced the formation of a task force
designed to improve air quality in Eagan.
The Eagan Air Quality Task Force will investigate MWCC and Eagan
citizens' concerns about the odors that have been present for the past
several summers in the Minnesota River Valley near MWCC's Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant (3750 Plant Road, Eagan).-
MWCC
agan).
MWCC and Eagan official's have been working together for the past several
.months to improve air quality. The Seneca Plant staff recently made a
number of process changes to help control any odors emanating from the
plant, and odor control systems similar to those used successfully
by Duluth's wastewater treatment facility were put into operation late
this spring.
t
An expansion of the Seneca Plant is scheduled to begin in the next two to
three years, and the task force will also examine the potential impact
of the expansion on Eagan air quality.
more
0-51
t
EAGAN TASK FORCE
Page 2
The mayor of Eagan, Bea Blomquist, and the manager of the Seneca Plant,
Jim Wawra, have mailed letters to more than 50 concerned citizens,
businesses and local officials inviting them to serve on the task force.
-fha )eider Boys in part,
"The management of the Seneca Plant is working with the City of Eagan
on the formation of an Eagan Air Quality Task Force 6ay the lettms.
"you have been selected as a neighboring resident who may have an interest
in serving on this committee to work with the Seneca staff in discussing
concerns, monitoring problems and recomIknding potential solutions."
® An informational meeting of the task force is scheduled to take \1 lace
Thursday, June 12, at 4:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall. The participants
will discuss the current situation at the Seneca Plant, air quality in
Eagan and the plans for plant expansion. They will also make plans
for a future tour of the Seneca Plant.
-30-
1
Z.66
�A�Ao AIQ QuAL�ry 'rhsK FoQC� vhT�,
%i ipp
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS
June 2, 1986
Mr. Lowell Bahrke, Training Officer
Eagan Fire Department
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
RE: Natural Gas Fire Demonstration
'Dear Lowell:
3958 Sibley Memorial Highway
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
612-454-6080
Sometime ago, Chief Childers and you expressed an interest in sending some
of your department members to a natural gas fire demonstration. We at
Peoples Natural Gas Company combined with Northern Natural Gas Company are
pleased to invite your group to a training session to be held on Tuesday,
June 24, at 6:30 P.M. at the Northern Natural Gas Company compressor station
at Farmington (note enclosed location map). Fire departments participating
are Eagan, Rosemount, Farmington, Cannon Falls, Lakeville, New Market and
Webster.
The demonstrations are designed to familiarize your fire fighters with the
basics of natural gas, what to do when there is a fire involving natural
gas, and techniques of extinguishing fires involving natural gas (both with
hose streams and chemical extinguishers). The types of fires fire fighters
will be experiencing are natural gas fueled, discharging from an open pipe
horizontally and vertically. Also included will be fires simulating line
hits and stored flammable liquid fuels involved in natural gas fueled fires.
40 It should be advised in advance to all fire fighters planning to participate
in the actual demonstrations that full turn -out gear will be required.
Upon completion of the training session, a lunch will be served at the site.
We would appreciate your response by June 16 as to the number of fire fighters
attending. Should you have any questions please contact me at 454-6080 or
Mark Adelmann with Northern Natural Gas Company in Farmington at 463-7126.
e�ly,
R eh H.
Loca Manager
RHL:dlo
Enc.
cc: /Thomas Hedges, Eagan City Administrator
Jay Berthe, Eagan Chief of Police
G.F. Lovell, District Manager, Peoples Natural Gas, Farmington, MN
0. C. Reimer, District Manager, Northern Natural Gas, Farmington, MN
?D7
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1986
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
Building
152
615
Electrical
Plumbing
177
145
692
554
RVAC
137
578
Water Softener
28
134
Signs
$ 31,331.50
$ 15,665.75
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
n
n
1 40 4-11
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
unvrm: v
rM.
TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES
3
FOUNDATION
0
380
SINGLE FAMILY
80
$ 6,984,000
$ 31,331.50
$ 15,665.75
$ 176
18
DUPLEX
4
298,000
1,426.00
713.00
8,626.0
91
TOWNHOUSE
32
1,791,000
9,593.00
4,796.50
65,989.0
7
CONDO
1
778,000
2,128.00
1,064.00
24,893.(:
0
APT BLDGS
0
0
AGRICULTURAL
0
9
COMMERCIAL
3
985,000
3,111.00
1,555.75
26,185.7
21
COMM/IND REMODEL
5
201,600
956.5b
415.75
.1,473.7
2
COMM/IND ADDITION
2
78,000
426.50
213.25
7g
0
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
INSTITUTIONAL
0
3
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1
320,000
983.00
.491.50
8,908.5
' 9
RES. GARAGES
4
22,900
226.00
---
238.0
11
RES. ADDITIONS
2
20,000
161.00
58.25
229.2
4
SWIM POOL
4
36,900
304.00
55.25
402:7
57
MISCELLANEOUS
14
56,000
645.50
83.50
762.5
0
DEMOLISH
0
HOUSE MOVES
615
TOTALS
152
11,571,400
51,292.50
25,112.50
315,183.01
YEAR-TO-DATE 57,514,650
235,693.Ob
115,578.70
1,484,836.9
rM.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY.REPOBT
DATE MAY 1986
MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN
TYPE
# OF
PERMITS
# OF
BUILDINGS
# OF I
UNITS
VALUATION
PERMIT FEES
SURCHARGE
PLAN REVIEW
FEES
TOTAL FEES
DUPLEX
4
2
4
$ 298,000
$ 1,426.00
$; 149.00
$ 713.00
$ 8.,626.00
4-PLEX
32
8
32
1,791,000
9,593.00
895.50
4,796.50
65,989.00
6-PLEX
L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R
7-PLEX
3595 KRESTWOOD LN
STAN SCHULTZ
180,000
633.00
90.00
316.50
6,421.50
COMM/NEI
8-PLEX
1 RST M'HAHA
APT. BLDG
1380 DUCKWOOD DR
K CHARLES DEV
650,000
1,808.00
325.00
904.00
12,927..00
COMM/NEI
16 -UNIT
1
1
16
778,000
2,128.00
389.00
1,064.00
24,893.00
TOTALS
37
11
52
2,867,000
13,147.00
1,433.50
6,573.50
99,508.00
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN
BLDG
PERMIT
STATE
PLAN REV
PERMIT #
ADDRESS & LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATION
FEE
SURCHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUP.
11912
1275 TOWN CENTRE DR
BURGER KING
$ 155,000
$ 670.50
$ 77.50
$ 335.25
6,837.25
COMM/NEI
L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R
11934
3595 KRESTWOOD LN
STAN SCHULTZ
180,000
633.00
90.00
316.50
6,421.50
COMM/NEI
1 RST M'HAHA
11992
1380 DUCKWOOD DR
K CHARLES DEV
650,000
1,808.00
325.00
904.00
12,927..00
COMM/NEI
L 1 B 1 EAGAN CONV CTR
12022
3945 LEXINGTON AVE SO
ADVENT UNITED
320,000
983.00
160.00
491.50
8,908.50
P.F./NEI
L 1 B 1 ADVENT UNITED
METH. CHURCH
11982
4215 NICOLS RD
JIM PERSONS
65,000
328.00
32.50
164.00
524.50
COMM/ADI
L 2, B 25, SECT 30
11905
3323 RIVER BLUFF DR
TORCHWOOD
13,000
98.50
6.50
49.25
154.25
COMM/AD]
L 12, B_l, ROBERT KARATZ
PROPERTIES
11877
3340 PILOT KNOB RD
AM. ASSOC. OF
25,500
175.00
13.00
87.50
275.50
COMM/REI
L 6, B 3, EFFRESS ADD
CEREAL CHEM.
11993
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
EAGAN WOODS
12,700
98.50
6.50
49.25
154..25
COMM/REI
L 1. B 1 EAGAN WOODS
LAND LTD PTNE
22996
1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD
FEDERAL LAND
5,400
56.50
3.00
---
59.50
COMM/RE!
L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100
' _h'+{Ya•o-L :.. �!T.ev-.. 4.-NW.aT .� .:. ene'-. ..: •.:: .- ._ �A, -- . ..:: -:........
MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION
DATE: MAY 1985
C
NUMHER OF
NUMBER OF
PERMIT
SUR-
SUR-
PLAN CHECK
TYPE
OF PERMITS
BUILDINGS
N
VALUATIONS
W
P
N
P
W
W
4 -UNIT
O
O
W
O
T0WNHOUSE
32
8
32
1,798,000
9,646.00
899.00
4,827.00
67,368.0,
6 -UNIT
1270 EAG AN INp ND bl
TOWNHOUSE
NO IN
NW MTL LIFE
1600 000
4,183.00
800.00
2,091.50
27 129.50
COMM
8 -UNIT
1243 EACAN IND RD
LEXINGTON
TOWNHOUSE
L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1
P
r
108.00
Y
O
O
A
(1
r
r
m
O
a
T
ri
10,683.00
2,100.00
•-1
Y
.�
T
i
2
m
r
[al
O
O
y
t'
y
r
CA
i
36
2,008,000
m
1,004.00
5,404.00
71,217.0
V!
r
F
r
ti
L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P
H
i 36.000
220.00
H
110.00
348.00
COMM
1253 EAC IND RD
10236
2..AC CTR IND
MJS SYSTEMS
45,000
260.50
22.50
130.25
40.25
W
W
10252
L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM
20
P
C
O
324.00
2,781.00
O
O
O
C
O
P
�
N
C
N
I
I
W
O
y
W
0
0
0
a
0
0 0
o
0
0
'm
N
_
C
P
W
N
m
m
c
C m
0
0
o
O
o
0
o m
9
W
N c
1
1
C
m
_
1
u
1
I
I
I
C
W
T
N
O
U
O
O
m
0
N
P
O
O
W
W
u O
C
•O
�
1
I
I
P
.WO
W
�
c
c
0
0
o
T
m
0
0
o
m
MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION
DATE: MAY 1985
BUILDING
NUMBER
NUMHER OF
NUMBER OF
PERMIT
SUR-
SUR-
PLAN CHECK
TYPE
OF PERMITS
BUILDINGS
UNITS
VALUATIONS
PERMIT FEES I
CILIRCE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
4 -UNIT
4955 PILOT KNOB RD
T0WNHOUSE
32
8
32
1,798,000
9,646.00
899.00
4,827.00
67,368.0,
6 -UNIT
1270 EAG AN INp ND bl
TOWNHOUSE
NO IN
NW MTL LIFE
1600 000
4,183.00
800.00
2,091.50
27 129.50
COMM
8 -UNIT
1243 EACAN IND RD
LEXINGTON
TOWNHOUSE
L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1
723.00
108.00
361.50
1,192.50
COMM
APT. OR
1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD
CONDO
L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100
FED LAND CO
4,200,000
10,683.00
2,100.00
5,341.50
51,415.50
COMM
2-PLEX
4
2
4
210,000
1,162.00
105.00
581.007,849.00`
TOTALS
36
10
36
2,008,000
10,808.00
1,004.00
5,404.00
71,217.0
BUILDING
PERMIT
SUR-
PLAN CHECK
PERMIT 8
ADDRESS 4 LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATIONS
FEE
CHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUr.,
10191
4955 PILOT KNOB RD
B 78 .F ION 33
T. JEPPESF.N
22,000
3 152.50
11.00
76.25
239.75
ACRIC
1270 EAG AN INp ND bl
10199
NO IN
NW MTL LIFE
1600 000
4,183.00
800.00
2,091.50
27 129.50
COMM
10206
1243 EACAN IND RD
LEXINGTON
L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1
723.00
108.00
361.50
1,192.50
COMM
10209
1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD
L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100
FED LAND CO
4,200,000
10,683.00
2,100.00
5,341.50
51,415.50
COMM
4175 LEXB54INGTOSF.CTN
7 AVE2J
10216
L
NW BELL TELF.P
25,000
170.50
12.50
85.25
268.25
COMM
10235
4178 KNOB DRIVE
L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P
NOSTALGIC HOME
i 36.000
220.00
18.00
110.00
348.00
COMM
1253 EAC IND RD
10236
2..AC CTR IND
MJS SYSTEMS
45,000
260.50
22.50
130.25
40.25
COMM
2109 CLIFF RD
10252
L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM
FED LAND CO
186,000
648.00
93.00
324.00
2,781.00
COMM
LJ1l u
I
— I<c3p(=>sia .Kerir)els
GERMAN SHORTHAIRED POINTERS
Puppies - Grown Dogs - Stud Service
Eagan City Council
3830 Pilot Knob ad
Eagan, MN 55122
Gentlemen:
1560 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MINN. 55121
454.503) — A..A Coo. 612
June 7, 1'986
I have just come home from a run through beautiful Eagan and am
moved to write to thank whoever has instituted the system of
® Bike paths.. .Eagan or Dakota County...... with a request to please
continue the system. It is a relief to be able to run off the
roads whenever possible. I look forward to more bike paths being
developed as time goes by.
Another thank you to Eagan for the development of so many parks
and "green spaces". As our city grows I believe it is very im-
portant to coninue to add green space as a buffer for the many
housing developments going up. This morning I ran by the new
Blue Cross -Blue Shield Neighborhood 'ark which is being developed,
and then I ran through Black Hawk Park, on the newly -mowed trail
How beautifull Wonderful hill -climbing work, too, for this runner!
In this vein, I would like our leaders to consider yet another
green space:
We own eight acres of land on Yankee Doodle Rd., bordered on the
east by Surrey Heights and on the west by the Eagan Water Treatment
facility. On our eight acres is a duck pond and it is surrounded
by beautiful wooded grounds. Our house is, we believe , one of the
pioneer farmhouses in Eagan (our deed reads 1890) and when we moved
here in 1956 to Eagan Township, was known as "The Old Heimel Place".
Yankee Doodle was a narrow dirt country lane and there was nothing
else out here except a few farms.
One cannot stop progress, however, and now Eagan is a busy growing
progressive city. Our back pasture (Dr. Lyle Hay's land) has been
sold and is being developed now for individual homes.. . It has
occurred to us that it might be very smart of Eagan to set aside
this picturesque chunk of land as green space -park, for the en-
joyment of all the people who presently live in Surrey Heights and
will be living in the new development in the back pasture. Walking
"nature trails" could be developed, and picnic areas here and there.
The house could possibly be maintained as a pioneer farmhouse......
When
a it
stop breeding better dogs -- You stop breeding good dogs
or removed to make way for more useable space along the
Yankee Doodle, Rd. segment.
If Eagan would be interested in seeing our land and/or talking
about it, we will be pleased to hear from you.
Thank you for your consideration of this proposal.
Sincerely yours,
C -
Mrs. D Sandberg
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 19.6
14445 DIAMOND PATH
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068
June 5, 1986
Mayor Bea Blomquist
City Hall "
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY
■ROBERT E. FERGUSON
454-4134
Dear Mayor Blomquist,
In behalf of the students and the faculty at Northview School, I would like
• to express our deep gratitude to the Eagan Police Department for furnishing
us with Officer Larry Billmeyer and his Intern Officer for our Bicycle Safety
Program. It was extremely successful even if we did have rain on the first
day. We resumed the program on the following Monday morning and completed
it on that day. For the past four years that we have had this program at
Northview School we have not experienced any fatal accidents of students
who have been in this program. _I think it is a fantastic program. I would
like to compliment Officer Billmeyer and Police Chief Jay Berthe for cooperating
with us in this community endeavor. I would also like to thank the Eagan Police
Department for the School Patrol picnic that they sponsored. It was just
outstanding to have the local Police Department work so closely with the schools
and the school patrol, thus making it possible for our studentsto arrive and leave
school as safely as possible.
Sincerely,
Robert E. Fergua`on
d/6
APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
14200 Cedar Avenue
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
June 3, 1986
Fire Chief Bob Childers
Eagan Fire Department
3800 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Chief Childers,
Once again I would like to offer our sincere thanks to your department
for responding to our mutual aid call for help.
Yesterday, June 2, our department was in Rosemount helping their department
fight a structure fire. The call required our department to utilize all
our rigs and manpower, which left Apple Valley without fire -,coverage.
Thanks to your department we felt secure in the knowledge that your
dedicated firefighters could and would respond to our mutual aid call.
Again, thank you cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Richard W. Tuthill
Fire Chief
It
XC: Eagan City Council'/
•
r.
c... immediate Release:
REPRINTED FROM JUNE
METRO MONITOR
For more information
contact the Public
Information Office
612/291.6464
Sen Reddick
291-6422
Five Solid Waste Resource Recovery Friday,
Plants Now Planned for Region May 30; 1986
This year, and for every year in recent memory, 95 percent of the region's
trash will be hauled to landfills to be unceremoniously buried.
is
That's about to change. Five big solid waste resource recovery plants are
currently being planned by Twin Cities Area counties and private firms.
Together, the plants will be capable of handling more than 4,000 tons of
trash every day, or about 72 percent of the region's trash.
Last month Dakota County decided'to build a waste -to -energy plant that
--would process about 735 tons of'trash per day. The resource recovery company,
P.L.M. Selberg's/Westinghouse, will own and operate the $90'million plant, to
be"built in Rosemount: The project will house an operation to produce refuse -
derived fuel (RDF) from trash, and boilers and generators to convert it into
electrical energy...
The project's fuel production will be accomplished with equipment made by
Swentec, Inc., a Swedish firm. Westinghouse will burn the fuel and sell the
electrical energy to Northern States Power Co.
Dakota County decided against sending its garbage to a joint
Ramsey/Washington County trash -to -energy plant in Newport, the region's only
trash -processing plant currently under construction. The Ramsey/Washington
plant, owned and operated by NSP, is scheduled to begin operation in the fall
of 1987. The plant will take 1,000 ton�trash per day from the two counties
and turn it into RDF.
NSP will burn the RDF to produce electricity at its power plants in Red
Wing and Mankato. Construction is projected to cost $31 million. Annual
operating costs will range from $5 million to $7 million. The plant will
recover materials such as iron and aluminum for recycling.
Hennepin County plans to start construction of a third big plant, a $70
million garbage -burning plant to be located in downtown Minneapolis, in the
spring of 1987. The plant, to be located at 5th St. N. and 6th Av. N., will
burn 1,000 tons of trash per day beginning in 1990.
The Hennepin plant, intended to greatly reduce the need for landfill space
in the region, will get its trash from Hennepin County, excluding Minneapolis
and three other cities (see Reuter project below). The trash will come from
four "transfer stations," located throughout the county.
Transfer stations are to be located in Bloomington, Brooklyn Park and
Minneapolis. Last month the Hennepin County Board decided to look at locating
the fourth transfer station in Eden Prairie instead of Hopkins.
The Council is preparing a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on
the plant and transfer sites for the county. It will issue the EIS for public
review June 129 and will vote on the adequacy of the study June 26.
Reuter, Inc. has laid the footings for the region's fourth major resource
recovery project. It's a $9 million effort in Eden Prairie that will -turn 400
tons a day of mixed municipal solid waste into fuel pellets. The plant, which
will have an annual operating budget of $4 million, is expected to be up and
running in October.
Minneapolis is negotiating a contract with the company to provide 350
tons of trash per day. Hopkins, Minnetonka and Shorewood have agreed to
provide another 50.tons per day.
Reuter plans to turn at least half the waste it receives into combustible
more v4
Pellets for sale to firms that currently burn coal or natural gas. About 15
percent of the waste will be glass, metals and plastics, which will be
separated and recycled. In the second year of operation, the company plans to
compost a portion of the residuals.
The Council recommended approval of Reuter's facility permit request in
March. "If Hennepin Council would give us the garbage, we'd like to build
another 400 -ton -per -day plant in the: county," said James Reuter, vice
president. "The county has a lot of garbage left that needs to find a home,
but not in the ground."
NSP will build, own and operate the region's f fth.resource recovery plant,
® with a capacity of 1,000 tons per day, in Sherburne.County.'s Elk. River. Trash
will come from Anoka County and possibly more from Hennepin and other counties
north and west of the seven -county region.
The $53 million plant will produce RDF to be burned for electrical power
primarily at United Power Assoc., a utility in Elk River. The plant, scheduled
to begin operation in 1989, is expected to have an annual operating budget of
$8.7 million. The -project will separate and recycle iron, aluminum and
possibly other materials.
Scott and Carver Counties are currently negotiating with firms to build a
resource recovery plant to serve their areas.
-30-
a17
*(I1 a X11 )Iemi,
,
3218 Snelling Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55406 -
61'1-729-5205
April 5, 1986
City Administrator
Thomas Hedges
t830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN. 55121
Dear Mr. Hedges,
For the past seven years the Blue Bell Ice Cream truck has
been a summer companion to thousands of Eagan residents young
and old alike. I am..writing this letter in the hope that I
can convince the council to allow us to operate in Eagan
once again. Late last summer I received a letter from the
City explaininq that Eagan City Code,. sec. 9.15 —Prohibiting
parking for the purpose of advertising or ceiling
merchandise, was going to be strictly enforced. We complied
with the request and did not operate after receiving the
letter. We did however receive numerous calls (not just from
children) inquiring as, to the Whereabouts of the "ice cream
man".
The point in the letter requesting we cease operation
mentioned a safety hazard. We consider ourselves a very
safety conscious company and train our drivers extensively
with both written and slide safety programs. In support of
our safety record I would like to present certain facts: We
have operated in Eagan from approximately May ist through
September 1st each year. The truck works an average of six
days per week and sells an average of 200 ice cream bars per
day. That means over our seven years of operation vie have
sold about 150,000 ice cream bars. In all this time and with
all those sales we have never had a single accident take
place. I feel this is an excellent record and if we are
allowed to operate again our commitment to safety will
remain just as strong. I am enclosing a letter from our
insurance carrier explaininq our limits of liability and our
safety record.
I am also enclosing the results of a recent Saturday
afternoon survey we took in Eagan asking people if they
wanted to have the ice cream truck back in their
neighborhoods. I am happy to report that at least 98. of the
people we asked said they saw no reason we should not be
allowed to operate.
In recent, years the cities of Richfield, St. Louis Park,
Mound and Fridley have altered their ordinances to allow
ice cream trucks. I am enclosing a copy of a letter from the
city manager of Richfield explaining his experience with
Blue Bell. (The letter was originally written to the city of
St. Cloud in support of our application to vend there.) I am
also enclosing copies of the altered ordinances from these
cities in the hope they can be used as a model in Eagan.
WI,
W
The Blue Feil truck has .also provided a welcome summer job,
usuilly for an Eagan college student.
In conclusion, we are asking that the council consider a way
for the "ice cream man/women" to be able to come back to
Eagan. We feel our record shows that we have been a
responsible and safety conscious company. We also feel we
have provided a desired service in a fun and positive
manner. I would be happy to work with the city to develop a
ordinance that would allow our operation. Thant: you for your
consideration of this proposal.
Sincerely;
r �n
Glenn Baron
Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc.
'219
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN., MINNESOTA
JUNE 17, 1986
C�1i�:V4tiZ�] i�i�►7
Item 1. O'Neil Vs City of Eagan
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Sncrease in Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds
Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit
2Za
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 16, 1986
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
Item 1. O'Neil vs. City of Eagan --City Attorney Hauge is planning
to provide an update on the current status of the O'Neil vs. City
of Eagan lawsuit. To date, Mr. O'Neil has not signed the letter
of understanding between the City of Eagan and Mr. O'Neil that
both parties will not proceed with depositions, discovery or any
other findings related to the lawsuit until the Comprehensive
Guide Plan update is completed. Enclosed on pages ZZy through
is a copy of a resolution that the City Attorney would like
to discuss with the City Council after the meeting on Tuesday.,
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Thomas Lake Apartment Project for Increase in Multifamily
Housing Revenue Bonds --The City held public hearings and granted a
multifamily housing revenue bond issued in the amount of
$10,000,000.00 for the Thomas Lake Apartment Project. The devel-
oper, Dominium Group, is requesting that the Inducement Resolution
be changed to allow the amount of multifamily housing revenue
bonds to increase from $10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00. Reasons
for changing the amount of the Inducement Resolution are outlined
in a letter from the Doninium Group and bond counsel, Holmes and
Graven, found on pages laa through ZZ Any change in the
resolution would require a public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a public
hearing to be scheduled at the July 1 City Council meeting for the
purpose of considering a change in the Inducement Resolution for
the Thomas Lake Apartment that would increase the amount of bonds
from 10,000,000.00 to $11,985,000.00.
Item 2. Wachovia Indirect Source Permit --Enclosed is a memorandum
from City Planner Runkle to the City Administrator regarding the
Wachovia Indirect Source Permit. The City Administrator and City
Planner would like to briefly review this permit with the City
Council. p. ZZ 4 Z30,
/s/Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
27-1
RESOLUTION
CITY OF EAGAN
1986
5-9-86
Draft Only
WHEREAS, the Eagan City Council in early 1985 directed the City staff and
consulting planner to commence the planning process in order to review the
Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan last prepared in 1980; and
WHEREAS, the study was commenced in early 1985 by the staff consulting
planner for a complete review of the Lana Use Guide, including residential,
commercial and industrially designated areas; and
WHEREAS, the statutory basis for the lana use planning within a statutory
city is found in Minnesota Statutes Annotated 462.355 including provisions for
adoption and amendment to the Comprehensive Municipal Plan; and
WHEREAS, an application was submitted to the City of Eagan by Robert
O'Neil and Grace O'Neil for the rezoning from A -Agricultural, to PD-Plannea
Development, for approximately 100 acres located in the south half of Section
10, north of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lexington Avenue and east of I -35E,
which was first considered at a public hearing of the Advisory Planning
Commission on May 28, 1985; and
WHEREAS, John Voss, the Eagan Consulting Planner, aid in a memorandum to
the City dated , 1985 suggest that the existing commercial -
type zoning within the City may be adequate for future development at the
current rate of commercial development within the City and as compared with
the amount of zoning and development in other metropolitan area suburban
municipalities; and
v7�
J
WHEREAS, at the time of the application submittea by Robert O'Neil the
zoning of the property was Agricultural and R-4, Multiple Residential, and the
lana use designation provided for an R -III density allowing for six to twelve
residential unite per acre; and
WHEREAS, an action was brought by the O'Neils against the City on or about
October 10, 1985 for specific relief, including a request that the City
Council approve the rezoning of the property as requested; and
WHEREAS, the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission submitted a recommendation
to the City Council regarding the application and the Eagan City Council acted
upon the application at its regular meeting on July 16, 1986; and
WHEREAS, in September of 1985 the City Council scheduled a special ,joint
meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission and City Council which first
met on October 7, 1985 to commence the Comprehensive Guide update process and
subsequently met as a ,joint committee on November 26, 1985, December 12, 1985,
January 23, 1986 and March 11, 1986; and
WHEREAS, prior to the action by the City Council on the application
submitted by the O'Neils, the City Council indicated that it has initiated
proceedings before the Advisory Planning Commission and the City Council to
review the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan last adopted in 1980 and the City
has since that time continued to review the plan in detail; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to proceed with the Comprehensive Guide
review process including residential, commercial and industrial uses and
proposed to the O'Neils that the action mentioned above be held in abeyance to
allow the City to proceed with the Comp Guide review; and
WHEREAS, the City Council at its regular meeting on March 19, 1986 adopted
a resolution directing the staff and the Advisory - Planning Commission together
with the Council to proceed with the Guide review process covering all
��3
applicable parcels and uses of land throughout the City subject, however, to
the entry into a stipulation between Robert and Grace O'Neil and the City of
Eagan providing for a 180 -day stay of the ,O'Neil civil action within which
time the City will proceed with its.Comp Guide planning process including
review and action of all commercial comprehensive guide planning within the
City; and
WHEREAS, there are numerous other parcels of property within the City that
are designated commercial use in the Land Use Plan or proposed to be
designated commercial use and it is necessary and expedient that the City
proceed with the Comprehensive Guide process including the commercial portion
of the Guide; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has attempted in good faith with unanimous
action at its March 19, 1986 meeting to proceed to resolve the action
commenced by the O'Neils including the submission of the proposed stipulation
based upon discussions with the attorney and representative of the O'Neils
together with representatives of the City; and
WHEREAS, although the O'Neils have not been willing to enter into a
Stipulation for the Stay of Proceedings during the Comp Guide review process,
the City Council has directed.the City representatives to meet and attempt to
negotiate a stay of the proceedings in order to allow the Comprehensive Guide
review to continue for the reasons that are described above;
NOW THEREFORE, upon motion by seconded by ,
it was Resolved as follows: -
1. That the Eagan City Council hereby directs the staff and the Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission, including the Council, to proceed with the
Comprehensive Guide review process covering all applicable parcels and uses of
land throughout the City, and further directs the planning consultant and
Zz�(
planning staff to provide appropriate studies and reports concerning the
Comprehensive Plan. for review and ultimate action by the Advisory Planning
Commission and City Council.
Dated:
Those in favor:
Thoseagainst:
ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF EAGAN
By: By.
E.J.an ver a e, .ler Beatta Blomquist, Mayor
zz�
1
rruup incorporated
3140 HARBOR LANE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55441 6121559-1711
June 12, 1986
Mr. Tom Hedges, City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
RE: REQUEST TO REVISE INDUCEMENT RESOLUTION FOR THOMAS LAKE
APARTMENTS
Dear Mr. Hedges:
We respectfully request that we be allowed to advertise this
week for a public hearing on July 1, 1986 to increase the
previously approved Inducement Resolution on the above
referenced project from $10,000,000.00 to $11,875,000.00. It
is of critical importance that the public hearing be held at
the regularly scheduled July 1, 1986 City Council meeting in
order to accomplish a July 31, 1986 project closing date as
required in our financing commitment. If the public hearing is
held on July 1, 1986, we have to publish a notice prior to June
15, 1986.
We are requesting that the Inducement Resolution be increased
for several reasons. First and most importantly, we have been
severely restricted in our ability to secure the types and
sources of financing commitments that we had earlier
contemplated using, because of the proposed changes being made
by the Senate and Congress to our current tax laws. The
financing commitment that we were able to secure requires that
we incorporate within the project longer periods of capitalized
interest thus increasing the total cost of the development. In
addition, we have made significant improvements to the project
in terms of amenities that will be provided to our residents
directly and indirectly. We have spent considerable time in
exploring ways to preserve larger areas of natural vegetation
by utilizing greater amounts of retaining walls than we had
initially proposed. The community facility has been greatly
upgraded in terms of recreational amenities and size. Lastly,
we have made significant improvements to the unit interiors by
providing such extra amenities as European cabinets,
microwaves, wood trim and paneled doors to mention a few items.
77-6
i
June 12, 1986
Mr. Tom Hedges
Page Two
Your cooperation in accommodating our request would be greatly
appreciated. Barbara Portwood, our bond counsel at Holmes and
Graven, has indicated that she will send you a procedural and
time schedule that will outline those items that have to be
completed in order to accommodate a July 31, 1986 closing date
on this development. Please give me a call to discuss this
issue further.
Sincerely,
AEB/sl
E
0
zz7
BARBARA L. PORTWOOD
Attorney at Law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9213
June 13, 1986
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 737-9700
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Re: $10,000,000
City of Eagan
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds
(Thomas Lake Apartments Project)
Series 1986
Dear Mr. Hedges:
Jack Safar, the developer of the above -referenced project has indicated to me that
he is negotiating with a tax-exempt bond fund for the sale of the above -referenced
bonds. Yesterday I spoke with the attorney for the fund who tells me that the
bonds must be closed by July 31st in order to be purchased by the fund.
A financing program for this project was approved by the City of Eagan and
reviewed by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency ("MHFA") last year.
However, because the developer proposes to increase the size of the issue to
$11,875,000, the program must be amended following a public hearing for which
notice must be published 15 days in advance. Following the public hearing the
program must be submitted to MHFA and not rejected for 30 days. In order to
meet these procedural requirements and close by July 31, 1986, notice would have
to be published on Friday, June 13th or Saturday, June 14th and a public hearing
would have to be held by the Eagan City Council on July 1st.
The purpose for this letter is to request that a public hearing be scheduled for July
1 and to request your permission to cause notice of the public hearing (in the
attached form) to be published.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact me.
Sincerely,
Barbara L. Portwood
BLP:ds
cc: Jack Safar
Armand Brachman Z2g'
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: CITY PLANNER RUNKLE
DATE: JUNE 13, 1986
SUBJECT: WACHOVIA INDIRECT SOURCE PERMIT
The purpose of .this memorandum is to convey activities surrounding
the Wachovia Indirect Source Permit (ISP). This memorandum. will
describe the purpose of an ISP and when a permit will be issued to
Wachovia. Material contained herein is for your information, and I
will continue to keep you informed as the ISP approval process
proceeds.
Project Description.
In early 1986, Wachovia Bank and Trust Company of North Carolina
purchased 267 acres of the Laukka-Beck planned development. The
Wachovia site is located in the south and west one half of the
Laukka-Beck planned development and situated south of Northwest
Orient's Corporate Headquarters. It is anticipated that the
Wachovia site will result in 3,376,510 square feet of mixed use
commercial development with construction to commence in 1987 and
conclude no later than the year 2020.
Indirect Source Permit.
An ISP is required by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)
when a concentration of air polluting sources are attracted to a
specific development site, and as a consequence will produce a
significant increase in air pollution, particularly carbon monoxide
and (CO emissions). The principal source of air pollutants in the
case of Wachovia are automobiles, retail and commercial facilities,
parking facilities and adjacent roadways. Based on air quality
projections prepared by BRW Engineering, the Wachovia site will not
exceed 8 -hr. average state standards for CO, though a permit is
required by MPCA because the site will have more than 1,000 parking
stalls.
At present, the Wachovia ISP authorizes the construction of
2,296,510 square feet of mixed use commercial development through
the year 2005 and specifically permits 11,732 parking spaces. A
second Wachovia ISP will be required in the future to construct the
remaining 1,080,000 square feet of mixed use commercial development
which is planned to commence in the year 2005.
ZZ�
Memo to City Administrator Hedges
June 13, 1986
Page 2
Current Activities.
The Planning Department met with Suzanne Pelly of the MPCA in late
April, 1986, for the purpose of reviewing an initial draft of the
Wachovia ISP. Staff has continued to participate in negotiations
with MPCA and Wachovia representatives for purposes of communicating
the City's interests. The 30 day comment will begin in the near
future and upon its conclusion an ISP will be issued to Wachovia by
MPCA. Once this permit has been issued, Wachovia may begin
construction activity.
The Planning Department will continue to follow activities surround-
ing the Wachovia ISP approval process and inform you when the permit
has been issued by MPCA. Please contact me if you have any
questions or concerns regarding this matter.
D2 \
City Planner
DR/SS/hb
7 36
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY HALL
JUNE 17, 1986
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF=ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35'- ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
A. Fire Department
�,5 B. Public Works Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
A. Contractor Licenses
1z B. Personnel Items
C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition
ISD. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob
Road - Trunk Storm Sewer)
E. 1986 Amusement Device Renewals
�$
F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals
.� o.IG. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals
:Z1H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility
o( -I. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing
(Deerwood School Addition)
�•_-�-J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (,Highview
Avenue - Streets)
ZL K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office Park
2nd Addition)
::n L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition)
D.20 M. Approve Final Plat, T.E.M. Addition
,i e.%DN. Approve Final Plat, Hampton Heights Addition
t.
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
(�•3 1A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of
Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City
P.33 B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets &
Utilities)
P,s�{C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458, (Eagandale Center
Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1,
1986, City Council Meeting
1 1 D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project ,471, (West Service Drive -
Storm Sewer) Will be Continued to July 1,, 1986, Meeting
�j E. Public Hearing for Project 444R, (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm
QSewer Outlet)
VI. OLD BUSINESS
'A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment
Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development
District X11
�? Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis
Johnson) Continued from May 21, 1986, City Council Meeting
Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - Cul de Sac Reconsideration
�p�D..
Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign
VII. NEW BUSINESS
0-'A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan) for a
Pylon Sign on Lot '2, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition
Located Yankee Doodle Road, West of Pilot Knob Road, NE 1/4 of
Section 16
B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign
Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE
Quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive, Lot 1,
Block 1, NE 1/4 of Section 16
C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard) from Setback Requirements
for Expansion & Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station Located on
Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition, SE Quadrant of
Yankee Doodle Road & Washington Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 16
k -:)5D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon Sign for
an Office/Warehouse Located Silver Bell & Highway 13, SE 1/4 of
the SE 1/4 of Section 18
13$E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motec
P Transmission) for a Pylon Sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray
Addition Located Cedarview Drive, NE 1/4 of Section 19
140F. Conditional Use Permit (R. Kaye Scheurenbrand) for a Commercial
Boarding Kennel on Approximately 5.8 Acres Located South of
A Cliff Road and East of Dodd Road, NE 1/4 of Section 36
G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life (Opus Corp) to Split
Lot 18 and Combine the N 1/2 with Lots 19 & 20, Creating a new
4 -Acre Parcel Loacted North of Lone Oak Road on West Service
Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Block 5, Part of SE 1/4
5 of Section 12
C,� fH. _Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD (Planned Development) to R-1
(Single Family Residential) for Approximately 111 Acres Located
East of T.H. 149.& South of T.H. 55, SE 1/4 of Section 12
�(e'jI. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Sideyard Setback Require-
ment for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition, Located East of
Galaxie Avenue on West Wind Tr., NW 1/4 of Section 32
p \45 J. Special Permit (Overhill Replat - Grand Oaks Development) to
Allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval, Located at Lot 2,
Block 4, Overhill Farms 2nd Addition Replat, East of Dodd, North
of Hay Lake Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25
pkl 3K. 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance
\ Renewal
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses on
\ Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh,
2882 Sibley Memorial Highway, West of Highview Park, 5112
1 Section 4
B. .Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee
\ C. Public Improvement Contracts
.P lV 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott Rd)
1 ,1$32. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Eagandale Lemay
1 Lake 2nd Addition
\0\3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Sperry
P ` Consolidation Facility
Dp Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids
(Daniel Drive)
A. Five -Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects
I%. VISITORS TO BE REARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
Z.
S. ADJOURNMENT ,,
l_1
40
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 12, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
ADOPT AGENDA/APPROVE-'MINUTES]
After approval is given to the June 17, 1986, agenda and regular
City Council meeting minutes for the June 3 meeting, the following
items are in order for consideration:
DEPARTMENT;HEAD:;BUSINESS
A. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. 3M Presentation of a Resusci Junior ---Mr. Tom Hutter, branch
operations manager of the Twin Cities sale center at the 3M plant
located in Eagan, will present a resusci junior to the Eagan
Fire Department. Since two of our firefighters, Scott Wood and
Jim Mueller, have given instruction time for the CPR training,
they would like to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and
Jim on behalf of all the employees involved in this training
at 3M. Chief Childers and firefighters Wood and Mueller. will
be at the meeting for the presentation. Enclosed on page _ J
is a copy of a letter that was sent by Mr. Hutter to Fire Chief
Childers, regarding the equipment and the official recognition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: There is no formal action
required. However, the minutes should reflect the acceptance
of a monetary receipt for specialized fire department equipment.
f
Twin Cities Sales Center/31Y!
PO Box 33211
St. Paul, Minnesota 551333211
3130 Lexington Avenue South
Eagan, Minnesota 55121-2239
612/733 3300
May 28, 1986
Mr. Robert Childers
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mr. Childers:
Two of your firemen, Scott Wood and Jim Mueller gave
unselfishly of their time to furnish instruction in
the art of CPR to several of our 3M employees. We
would like to express our appreciation for this ser-
vice by presenting you with the enclosed check for
$375.00 to be used for the purchase of a Resusci
Junior which I understand is a mannequin used for
water rescue and resuscitation training.
If possible, we would like you to make arrangements
to purchase this through your normal channels and then
advise us when it would be convenient for us to present
this to you in a formal ceremony at one of your meetings
or at a City Council Meeting. At that time I would plan
to present a plaque of recognition to Scott and Jim on
• behalf of all of the employees involved in this training
and 3M. Leroy Kugel, as our on-site representative, would
also accompany me for this presentation.
I would appreciate your giving me a call or dropping me
a note as to the time and place that it would be appropriate
for this presentation.
On behalf of 3M and our employees I want to thank you for
making time available for Scott and Jim to provide this
training for our employees. It is sincerely appreciated.
Sincerely,
T.C�u ter
Branch Operations Manager
Twin Cities Sales Center/3M
TCH:jah
cc: Leroy Kugel
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONT"D
2. Resignation of Fire Chief Childers --Bob Childers, Fire Chief
has formally submitted his resignation to be effective July 5,
1986, from the Eagan Fire Department and the po ition of Fire
Chief, for the City of Eagan. Enclosed on page is a copy
of his resignation letter. (There is additional information
concerning the position of Fire Chief and is'enclosed as a part
of the Informative Memo.)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
of Bob Childers as Fire Chief for the City of Eagan.
3
June 5, 1986
TO: EAGAN CITY
EAGAN FIRE
TOM HEDGES
EAGAN FIRE
COUNCIL
DEPARTMENT EXECUTIVE BOARD
DEPARTMENT RELIEF ASSOCIATION
FROM: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF
® I hereby submit my resignation as of July 5, 1986
from the Eagan Fire Department and the position of
Fire Chief for the City of Eagan. The purpose of
my resignation is for retirement after serving
twenty three (23) years as an Eagan Volunteer Fire
Fighter.
T have most certainly enjoyed my association with
the fire department and the city. I fdel I have
personally gained much from my experience.
I deeply appreciate the support I have received
from the members of the fire department and all the
departments of the city. It sure helped me
accomplish my job much easier.
® I wish the fire department well and I will be
available to help when I can.
Respectfully yours,
Bob Childers
BC/ma
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Three
B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
1. Stop Sign Request, Yorktown Place and Trenton Road --In the
early part of April, Charles Souza of 4248 Trenton Road (.Lot
1, Block 3, Northview Meadows) contacted the Police Department
for a complaint regarding traffic volumes and property damage
to his corner lot at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Trenton
Road. Subsequently, the Police Department reviewed the situation
on April 12 and 13, with Officer Kasat submitting his report
enclosed on page 6� .
On April 15, Councilman Wachter relayed this property owner's
• concern to the Council and it was referred to the Engineering
Division for further investigation.. Enclosed on pageZ is
a copy of the report prepared by the Assistant City Engineer
regarding the request for a three way stop sign at the intersection
of Yorktown Place and Trenton Road. Earlier this year, the
Engineering Division received a similar request for a stop sign
at the intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. In
this similar situation, this intersection did not meet the warrants
for the installation of a stop sign and the requesting property
owner was so informed by the letter enclosed on page �/, .
Mr. Souza has been informed that this item will be considered
by the Council at the June 17 meeting for final resolution.
It is the staff's recommendation that a three way stop sign not
be installed, but rather yield signs be placed on Trenton Road
at the intersection with Yorktown Place and on Yorktown Place
at the intersection with Braddock Trail. Enclosed on page
is a map showing the relationship of the two intersections be ng
discussed.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM': To approve the installation
of three way stop signs or yield signs at the intersections of
Trenton Road/Yorktown Place and Yorktown Place/Braddock Trail.
('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J
M1�
V �
A_
p
i
o
O�
�lN�l�6i✓,y
�YO%,
y'�)d�,S
s!/�y/Yi1 �d`�
�
ti
//"
�Ngp��j
/�»'/1i
lv,'Y s°eS p/ �/N®
>r r
��n7�rlsx�
rr��y>o
u sr is ;)s y
('sN94'D15' d+^Yi_ 7717j7 r/ j7iY�J
M1�
V �
A_
p
T
Kre.s cols•
eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r
4 " ' � !4
op
4,0
�,v r
•
i
o
O�
7 ❑
D'
n`
Z
Mm ❑
�
ti
Y
Z
�l
I
�y
f
T
Kre.s cols•
eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r
4 " ' � !4
op
4,0
�,v r
•
7 ❑
D'
n`
Z
Mm ❑
�
ti
Y
Z
T
Kre.s cols•
eSf�(� Lnir S.s.r
4 " ' � !4
op
4,0
�,v r
•
MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS COLBERT
FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI
DATE: APRIL 24, 1986
SUBJECT: 3 -WAY STOP SIGN REQUEST AT THE INTERSECTION OF
YORKTOWN PLACE AND TRENTON ROAD
At the April 15, 1986, Council meeting, Coucilman Wachter
informed me of a complaint he received from the owner of Lot 1,
Block 3, of Northview Meadows Addition. The complainant
contacted the Police Department regarding his concerns for the
high traffic volumes associated with the modal homes located just
north of him. In addition, the complainant alleges that vehicles
have been jumping the curb and driving over the corner of his
lot. Chief Berthe had two officers investigate the complaint.
They did not see anyone drive over the complainant's yard,
however, they felt a three-way stop sign would be appropriate at •
the Trenton Road and Yorktown Place intersection. Attached is a
copy of the officer's report.
I disagree with the recommended three-way stop sign to be used as
a speed control. The manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devises
specifically warns against using stop signs for controlling speed
limit. Also, I do not believe this intersection would meet with
any of the following warrants found in the manual:
1. Intersection of a less important road with a main road where
application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly
hazardous.
2. Street entering a through highway or street.
3. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area.
4. An intersection where a combination of high speed,
restricted view, and serious accident record indicates a
need for control by the STOP sign. 40
Yorktown Place is a street built to normal residential standards.
I would estimate the traffic volumes upon full development of the
area surrounding Yorktown Place to be about 700 trips per day. I
would anticipate the builders of the existing model homes to
convert those into residential units by the end of this year.
Then the traffic will be based on normal residential usage.
In summary, I feel that a three-way stop sign placement at the
Yorktown Place and Trenton Road intersection would be an
inappropriate means of speed limit control. I would be happy to
discuss %�tth%his in more detail with you if you would so desire.
Assistant City Engi er
RMH/]]
cc: Jay Berthe, Police Chief
Ted Wachter, City Councilman
®■
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P - BOX 21199
BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
Mayor
PHONE: (612) 454-8100
THOMAS EGAN
.1AMES A. SMITH
- MC ELLISON
'
THEODORE WACHTER
March 12, 1986
COUnC° Memms
- .- - -.
THOMAS HEDGES
CIN Adminstf Wo1
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
ON Clerk
KAREN MURPHY
4253 BRADDOCK TRAIL
EAGAN MN 55123
RE: TRAFFIC CONTROL - YORKTOWN PLACE AT BRADDOCK TRAIL
Dear Karen:
I am writing in response to your request for a stop sign at the
intersection of Yorktown Place and Braddock Trail. The City has
standard conditions which need to be met to warrant stop signs.
These conditions are outlined in a manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration. Our office has looked at this intersection
and was unable to meet any of these conditions to warrant a stop
sign.
Although you expressed an interest in a stop sign, we feel that a
yield sign would be more appropriate.. This would catch the
attention of the drivers without requiring a complete stop in all
cases.
Therefore, if you would like to request placement of a yield sign in
writing to our. office, I think we would have a better chance of
getting a method of traffic control at Yorktown Place and Braddock
Trail.
Sincerely,
ai,d E. Knudsen
Engi eering Technician
CEK/jj
N
THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
SEC. r 6� O 7 R / 3 CO' "Y
D N. CARSON I ``, V _
(mr♦ 9 L/:=v L/a CAvOTT COUNT
I Y �Y ' / ®C 1` _
Y. VINN
E.L1 '., � :.i R23 SLPTEVBER,1.11 , a
CN IH SEC 24, T. 27, R.'3
AID :T— _ _ __ _
r FP HI GFN'AY ......r.n .r.-- NO )D n,. ,1.: ,.. , ,Y __ .r.. •. �..
£✓ � ¢ '• .- ,.•
DIF „!LC-�Y ic,;� _ , jDIf REI' gDADIT— CDIIXTT rL TATE "rn'� SID ••��, XIG WAYi
(_EFCP0 Po'F\\ fy+'..'�y`1 a _ ye-•. �C'= f. I.
' ...r. � �/Fi + g �w<��E v JI v r. 'e •. v I .3.r� �' ' 2 Cil: O {i _"�. r
Is
S •2 �¢ Wlrq
1 1 'Q
{ 2 Q ,..•
�, � L •° � .° PL CE - ^9 , IOnKTONN �• '• �, •rY PLACE
��sl=11•n•�.r., UN � E '� • ���,, ,�. L.. '�/ � . � i 1
t E>, F.�a;/ii ADDI!TIN: ,s r =1t,.—SUN
_ .� P�`_. \ ° ••�`_ 5 r� i erre,, ; , v ,I; I L L. ; { , • '� .EISSD
"; � t "r> i I r^xL..�x aacE i .>=� � - .. � -'�'• 'l - I s
� .,rr f �r: � .� y� , r• •I�: ti �� ..V Ei"r�„r�l., s= ,FI ?',
�>• f. f I +,�� _ - err. 4 .�F � •..r. .. " a
° ~ i`�'.r G\alb :� ..., ..' ;ur,.r .,'. ". � .L �•cre �, „�'• . :z'
n .l ��r .i $I :l. o.° .i ••�� r•..'_n *TE LACKYDRI
w r7—
KING----
SECG�D
2 1g
e.DJI TION
�-
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Four
CONSENT AGENDA
There are fourteen ( 14 ) items on
Items requiring one (1) motion
Council wishes to discuss any
those items should be removed
under Additional Items unless
the agenda referred to as Consent
by the City Council. If the City
of the items in further detail,
from the Consent Agenda and placed
the discussion required is brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSES
A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who have been selected' and retained
• as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to
reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references
from other municipalities or their client permit applications
are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of
contractor licenses as presented.
/Q
CONTRACTORS' LICENSE
JUNE 17, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTOR
1. REGGIE KAJER CONST
2. KEN SMITH'S REMODELING
3. TWOMEY THE CARPENTER
4. J.R. UZZELL BLDRS
HEATING & VENTILATING
1. PREFERRED MECHANICAL SERVICES INC
PLUMBING
1. A & G PLUMBING
2. WILLIAM GADTKE
3. CHEMED CORPORATION
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Five
PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Police Officer --An additional police officer position
was approved for the 1986 budget effective July 1, 1986. It
is the recommendation of Chief of Police Berthe that Curtis
Sisco, who is presently a. Community Service Officer with the
Eagan Police Department, be appointed to the new police officer
position. As the Council is aware, Eagan C.S.O. 's have completed
the education and skills requirements necessary for P.O.S.T.
licensure. They have been processed through a rigorous interview
and screening procedure before they are selected as C.S.O.'s
and have spent many months in training in the Eagan Police Depart-
ment.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Curtis Sisco as a Policer Officer, effective July 1, 1986.
Item 2. C.S.O.--If the hiring of Curtis Sisco is approved,
a vacancy will exist for a C.S.O. It is the recommendation
of Chief of Police Berthe that Kenneth Conyers be appointed
to that C.S.O. position. Conyers is P.O.S.T. certified and
has previously served as an officer in the Eagan Police Department.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment
of Kenneth Conyers as a C.S.O. in the Eagan Police Department.
Item 3. Compost Site Monitors --Two positions are available
for the part-time, temporary position of Compost Site Monitor.
These employees would work only on Saturday afternoons and only
® one employee would work any one Saturday. It is, however, neces-
sary to have two Compost Site Monitors in order to insure that
a monitor is available. It is the recommendation of Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein that Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz be
hired to fill these temporary positions.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of Sharon McNeely and Kenneth Metz as temporary compost site
Monitors for the 1986 season.
Item 4. Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker --It is the recommenda-
of Superintendent of Utilities and Buildings• Connolly that David
Erickson be hired to fill the one remaining vacant seasonal.
utility maintenance worker position.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring
of David Erickson as a Seasonal Utility Maintenance Worker.
/v
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Six
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL/ROBBINS ADDITION
C. Final Plat Approval, Robbins Addition --The staff has received
an application for final plat approval for the Robbins Addition
which is located in the SW Quadrant of 1-494 and T.H.149 as
shown on a copy of the plat enclosed on page All conditions
of
placed on the preliminary plat approval November 17, 1981,
have been complied with and the final plat conforms with the
previous preliminary plat approval concept. All final plat
application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff
and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat
for the Robbins Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk •
to execute all related documents.
/3
I
VCMRT YAP
rrr ; 7r118,.cr n
00
rJ
DETAIL
rno $CALF)
EXHIBIT it Aa
Ah
ROBINS A®®IiI®N
r r✓1
P`
INTERSTATE
A
OUTLOT ti
7a
w�
j V
we.9iPr'!
{
1
1
•
�I
r ar
QO'
♦
%
�rM P'
3
I
i
/
b
8
\\\
i
c
°Te
Al<.rJK
!A. r. rn •[�
10, b
ti
Ati P
N'
!�
��ilro'
w
EXHIBIT it Aa
Ah
ROBINS A®®IiI®N
r r✓1
P`
INTERSTATE
• ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y
YCar� i,
•tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C.
YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q
.i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1.
494
r..T. rrr w rr
%
// do iu
I
OUTLOT ti
7a
I
N
i
{
1
1
i
I
1
♦
%
�rM P'
3
I
i
/
b
8
\\\
Jl
c
°Te
• ��r . Yu,Y ..Yr/R. r YOn .Y
YCar� i,
•tT Mpy-2 y■9 O u I8 T. IM C.
YA M m w .vM IYIY Dr A,w� .oC..q
.i YlD�w .1�Q1.YrL .r YOw M M ,Y1.
494
r..T. rrr w rr
%
e
7a
N
1
{
v
m
P
x
b
8
i
�y►
!�
��ilro'
• d/rj X11/
�r..w �.[trr.rr.arir
0K! <Jt'ITIOddlO w//
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
PROJECT 473/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING
D. Project 473, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Pilot Knob
Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) --With the proposed upgrading of Pilot
Knob from I -35E to Apple valley in 1987, a preliminary analysis of
the storm sewer needs indicate that additional trunk storm sewer
improvements and revisions to existing facilities will be required
to handle the increased •run-off generated from this major County
road improvement.. Subsequently, our consulting engineer has pre-
pared a feasibility report addressing the major areas of trunk
storm sewer improvements associated with the County road upgrading.
These involve modifications to the Evergreen Park lateral storm
sewer system, outlets from Berry Patch Park (Mooney Lake) to
Patrick Eagan Park and construction of storm sewer across City -
owned property south of City Hall.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 473 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) and
schedule a public hearing to be held July 15, 1986.
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 1,7, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Eight
AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
E. Amusement Device Renewals --The City Clerk's office has received
applications for local businesses renewing amusement devices::
Attached on. page/ �f is a copy of the list of the amusement
device renewals. Al-1%amusement device machines do meet and satisfy
City Code regulations.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To
ment device renewals as presented.
A6
approve the 1986 amuse -
Name & Address
1986 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
Number of Machines - Locations
Sam Nilva 5 machines - Cedarvale
National Amusement Co.
P.O. Box 16206
Minneapolis, MN 55416
D.V.M. Company over 15 machines
119 State Cedarvale Lanes
St. Paul, MN 55107 3883 Beau d'Rue Drive
3 machines
La Fonda's
3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy
4 machines
Richard's Food & Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
® James Durning 1 machine
4625 Nicols Rd Durnings
Eagan, MN 55122
Harold Steinman
2 machines
3300 Minnehaha Ave. S.
Eagan Steak House
Minneapolis, MN 55403
1448 Yankee Doodle
Rd
Theisen Vending
2 machines
3804 Nicollet Ave. S.
Eagandale Club
Minneapolis, MN 55409
3330 Pilot Knob Rd
2 machines
Al Baker's
3434 Washington Dr
•
James A. Basta
1 machine
Italian Pie Shoppe
Italian Pie Shoppe
1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
1438 Yankee Doodle
Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
Harold Awe Company
3 machines
1372 Scheffer Ave.
Mr. D's Pizza
St. Paul, MN 55116
3904 Beau d'Rue Dr
Advance Carter Co.
2 machines
850 Decatur Ave. N.
Pizza Hut
Minneapolis, MN 55427
3992 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
2 machines
Charkist
1975 Senaca Rd
Gary Starks
over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road
Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121
3125 Dodd Road
1 machine
Piccolo's Pizzeria
4162 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Slicer's Restaurant
2113 Cliff Rd
•
0
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
SERVICE STATION RENEWALS
F. 1986 Service Station Permit Renewals --There are ten (10)
service station permits requiring renewal for the period of
July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1987. A list of those service
station permits are enclosed on page All service stations
appear to meet regulations set forth in e City Code,
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve service station
permit renewals as presented.
O
•
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
JUNE.17, 1986 AGENDA
Country 66
3206 Sibley Mem. Hwy.
Eagan 55121
Q Petroleum
4206 Nicols Rd
Eagan 55122
Superamerica
Diffley Rd & Sibley Mem. Hwy.
Eagan 55122
Superamerica
Yankee Doodle & Pilot Knob Rd.
Eagan 55122
Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Rd
Eagan 55122
® Eagan Service Center (Union 76)
4195 Nicols Rd
Eagan 55122
Sinclair Station
3946 Cedar
Eagan 55122
Eagan Standard
4205 Nicols Rd
Eagan 55122
Texaco Fuel Stop
3150 Dodd Road
Eagan 55121
Cedar Cliff Amoco
4600 Slater Rd
Eagan 55122
There are ten service station permits which should be renewed for the
period of July 1, 1986 to June 30, 1987.
N
I*
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
TRAILER PERMIT'RENEWALS
G. 1986 Trailer Permit Renewals --Trailer permit renewals for
1986/19'87 have been processed by the City Clerk's office and
inspected by the Building Inspections Division. The City Council
has previously requested a detailed review of each trailer permit
to determine whether the purpose is consistent with the reasons
that were given for the granting of the actual trailer permit.
Enclosed on pages 7_through _ is a copy of the Chief Building
Inspector's review and a list of trailer permit renewals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the trailer
permit renewals as presented.
CW
Y
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE.PETERSON, CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL
DATE: JUNE 13, 1986
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS FOR 1986/87
Administrative Intern, Cheryl Johannes, has investigated the current status of
the proposed trailer permit renewals. The status of each permit on record is
the same as when granted. We have received complaints of unsavory conditions
at 670 Lone Oak Road and they have either been rectified or were unfounded.
The permit at 3850 Cornation Drive issued to James Horne was originally for
one year, to terminate June 1985 and in 1985 a renewal was granted for an
additional year. A request for another one-year extension has been received
and awaits Council action.
• If you require further information, please contact me.
DP/j
•
1
f:.
I
,t
II C •
TO: DALE PETERSON
FROM: LIZ WITT
DATE: JUNE 9, 1986
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87.
I have no idea of their current status.
In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special
trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85.
I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit
expired June 1, 1986.
Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv •
approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home
for summer construction help. I have heard some complair
about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home".
When do they disband?
I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if
possible.
f
w,
1
f:.
I
,t
II C •
TO: DALE PETERSON
FROM: LIZ WITT
DATE: JUNE 9, 1986
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
Attached are trailer permit renewals for '86—'87.
I have no idea of their current status.
In addition, I've attached the minutes of a special
trailer permit for Jim Horne, approved in '84 & '85.
I don't know if he still has a trailer, but his permit
expired June 1, 1986.
Further, Joe Steininger, 670 Lone Oak Road, receiv •
approval for temporary parking of a mobile trailer home
for summer construction help. I have heard some complair
about the unsavory conditions surrounding the "home".
When do they disband?
I'd like to have the item on the June 17 agenda, if
possible.
RE: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
1.
Tripp Oil.Co.
permitted
prior to
1970 and
3085 Hwy 13
remain in
office use.
Eagan, MN 55121
2.
Earl Marotzke
permitted
prior to
1970 and
535 Gun Club Road
remains in use as
a family home.
Rosemount, MN 55068
3.
Alwin & Lyle Schultz
permitted
prior to
1970 and
1315 Carriage Hills Drive
remains in
use as
a familyhome.
Eagan, MN 55121
4.
Edmund Schwanz
permitted
in 1980
and remains in
810 Yankee Doodle Rd
use as a residence
for Mr. Schwanz
Eagan, mN 55123
mother.
-S
5.
Levi Heuer
permitted
in 1983
and remains in
550 Diffley RD
use as a residence
for George Meister.
Eagan, MN 55123
®
6:
Dakota Homes
permitted
in 1972
and remains in use
3660 Dodd Road
as a sales
office
for mobile homes.
Eagan, MN 55121
n
LJ
v3
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE/VOTING ACCESSIBILITY
H. Approval of Special Advisory Committee for Voting Accessibility -
Both Federal legislation and Minnesota statutes require that
all polling places located within a municipality used for primary
and general elections be surveyed to determine whether the facility
is accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. If any of
the polling places located within the 14 precincts are not acces-
sible and it is determined after a survey that there are no
other locations that could be used that are accessible to the
handicapped and elderly, it is necessary to appoint a special
advisory committee for the purpose of continuing an effort to
locate a permanent, accessible polling place in or near Precinct
3 for future elections. If Highsite Apartments is approved
• by the Secretary of State's office as the polling location for
Precinct 3 after a report is filed by the Voting Accessibility
Advisory Committee that there are no alternatives, then elections
judges are allow to assist the handicapped or elderly voter
with curbside voting or some other means available during the
election. For additional information on. this item, refer to
a memo prepared by Administrative Assistant Witt describing
the federal polling place accessibility law on page 2ij .
•
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Betty Preston,
Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler as members of the Voting
Accessibility Advisory Committee for the purpose of continuing
all efforts to locate a permanent, accessible polling place
in or near Precinct 3 for future elections.
a�
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
DATE:JUNE 10, 1986
RE: FEDERAL POLLING PEACE ACCESSIBILITY LAW
Federal legislation and Minnesota Statutes require that all polling places
for the 1986 primary and general elections be surveyed to determine whether
they are accessible to handicapped and elderly voters. A survey report is
to be completed for each precinct and the reports are to be filed with the
Secretary of State's office by July 11 1986.
Carolyn and I have completed our survey of Eagan's 14 polling places. All but
precinct 3 (High Site recreation building) are accessible or can be made access-
ible. We conducted a windshield survey of the precinct, which is bounded by
Pilot Knob Road, Lone Oak Road, east city limits and Yankee Doodle Road. Most
of the structures are industrial/warehouse buildings which probably could not
accommodate a public polling place. Other structures have security constraints
which preclude public access.
• We did contact Federal Land Company regarding Waterview Tower. They really were
not interested in a short or long term commitment.. We -looked at the Lemay Lake
Apartments which'are under construction but don't know.if they have an accessible
and otherwise appropriate place for our use. Because the High Site building has
stairs it is not accessible. We have provided a portable voting device to anyone
who requests it, but the federal legislation says this is -riot sufficient.
The Voting Act states that if the City officials determine that no available
place is accessible or can be made accessible, a VotingAccessibility Advisory
Committee must be established: The committee must be made up of at least 50%
representation from individual or organizations representing the elderly and
disabled voters.
Because we do not have an accessible polling place in Precinct 3 and must report
by July 1, I 'request that the City Council appoint Betty Preston >
•Corrine Robinson and Marilyn Legler to .the Advisory
Committee. The recommended appointees' represent the handicapp, elderly and
Precinct Three"election judges. Following Council.approval, the Advisory Committee
will make a determination of accessibility for a Precinct 3 polling place. If the
committee cannot find an available place, they must file a certified request for
exemption from compliance. The regulations further require that the elderly or
handicapped voter must be provided an alternative means, i.e., curbside voting,
which we have available.
ACTION TO BE TAKEN: Approval of Betty Preston , Corrine Robinson
and Marilyn Lee.ler to the Voting.Accessibility Advisory Committee.
Staff will continue its efforts to locate 'a permanent, accessible polling place
in or near Precinct 3 for future elections.
-5
,0
Agenda Information Memo
June -17, 198,6, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
VACATE UTILITY
IVE PETITION
L. Vacate Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order Public Hearing
(Deerwood School Addition) --We have received a request to vacate
the utility line easement for the water line through the Deerwood
School Addition due to a change in alignment based on the final
site plan for the Deerwood Elementary School.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
and order a public hearing to consider a vacation of the utility
easement for the Deerwood School Addition.
PROJECT 476, RECEIVE REPORT
ORDER PUBLIC HEARING (HIGHVIEW AVENUE)
J. Project 476, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Highview
Avenue - Streets) --At the May 6 meeting, the Council received
a petition requesting the completion of the eastern 300 feet
of Highview Avenue to City standards. In response to this petition,
the Council authorized the feasibility report which has now been
completed and is being presented to the Council in consideration
of scheduling a public hearing for formal discussion and action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 476' (Highview Avenue - Streets) and order
the public hearing to be held July 15, 1986.
CONTRACT 85-19, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1
K. Contract 85-19, Approve Change Order #1 (Eagandale Office
Park 2nd Addition) --Contract 85-19 provided for the installation
of streets and utilities for the construction of Corporate Center
Curve Road to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition.
Prior to completion of the final wear surface, a large "sink
hole" occurred which required corrective repair action. During
the excavation of repair, it was discovered that this settlement
resulted from the previous deposition of construction debris
(concrete curbing, etc.) approximately 15 feet below ground level.
Because this corrective action was not a defect of the City's
contractor, this work was above and beyond the scope of the contract
and should be processed through a change order which would add
$2,607.01 to the base contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve. Change Order
#1 to Contract 85-19 in the amount of $2,607.01.
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986;, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
AND UT -
L. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement, Receive Petition/Order
Public Hearing (Blackhawk Glen Addition) --With the proposed
development of the Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the developer
is requesting a reconfiguration of the drainage and utility ease-
ment dedicated for the pond south of Ashbury Road and east of
Birchpond Road to allow the development of single family houses.
With all requirements of the petition being in order, it is
appropriate for the Council to schedule a public hearing for
formal discussion.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition
to vacate the drainage and utility easement over a portion of
Blackhawk Glen Addition and schedule the public hearing to be
held on July 15, 1985.
a7
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986., City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, 'TEM ADDITION
M. Final Plat Approval for T.E.M. Addition --We have received
an application for final plat approval for the T.E.M. Addition
located south of Golden Meadow Road as shown by the map enclosed
on pageeAll conditions of the preliminary plat approval
granted by Council on May 21, 1986, have been complied with.
All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed
by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
plat for the T.E.M. Addition and authorize the Mayor and City
Clerk to execute all related documents.
M
•
VICINITY MAP
a
-IRE it +
M
Ill%% SEt':rl
TEM M. ADDI TION
MINA" 1110 UII(In EASENENIS MC YIdN 111115:
b;y S I..I ;l ; .ixlx.n;.. ;p;c.lp. .
pio: n;.q 1.1 ilry.. A. p;p 10 I. pl.1.
olpnia. IplAl.x..ptl/oinirq aln.l I�p....xpn
—N—
cp .wrmof ,p A y n. S'cr— is. l...:, N(w.:, i6
up.. o p p.ci,q of xo.rn A e.a•...5 .�n,l.. u . w
lur.
A, pp'.. 51. A,;6 �Rn AN,
I p .s.�n. l ....p
'xl]Irt15-. -1... a p,.A.. pn,
• III .In I. An /ip .—., I— -
SIGMA
'UR
BURYFVIINIB
BHRVIC HO
ew..e+.o p.e
Nxurl�lA.NTin
0
Aaenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Fifteen
APPROVE FINAL PLAT, HAMPTON HEIGHTS ADDITION
N. Final Plat Approval for Hampton Heights Addition --We have
received an application for final plat approval for the Hampton
Heights Addition, located south of Yankee Doodle Road, adjacent
to the Public Works Maintenance Facility as shown by the map
enclosed on page * All conditions of the preliminary plat
approval granted by Council action on May 21, 1985, have been
satisfactorily complied with except for the installation of the
trailway from Yankee Doodle Road to the Blackhawk Glen Addition.
At a special meeting of the. Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission
on June 11, 1986, that Commission rescinded their previous require-
ment for this trail. Although the development contract agreement
provided wording for compliance with this trailway requirement,
if the Council concurs with the Park Commission's recommendation
to eliminate this requirement, this can be resolved through an
addendum to the contract and an immediate reduction in the financial
guarantee as it relates to the trailway requirement.
All other final plat application materials have been submitted,
reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final
plat for the Hampton Heights Addition and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
• *Special Note: The map showing the final plat was not available for
inclusion with this packet. The map will be forwarded with. the
Additional Information packet on Monday.
30
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Sixteen
OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
A. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number
of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the May 6, 1986,
City Council meeting a demographic study and request to amend
the off -sale liquor license ordinance to allow for five (5)
licenses,with the new license application to be issued in the
northerly part of the City, was reviewed as presented by the
Federal Land Company. As a part of the deliberation by the
City Council there was some. consideration given to removing any
limit on the number of off -sale licenses allowing the number
of off -sale liquor stores to be controlled by the market place,
similar to all other retail establishments. The following action
was taken: Smith moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to authorize
one additional off -sale liquor license in. the northerly portion
of the City, generally in the Town Centre area, and further that
a public hearing be scheduled for the June 17, 1986, Council
meeting to consider removing the restrictions or revising the
number of off -sale liquor licenses approved by City ordinance,
noting at the time of adoption of the original policy in 1973,
only Cedarvale Shopping Center was in existence; that an application
would be entertained by the City Council for an additional license
in the Town Centre area, and further, to authorize the revision
of the Eagan Ordinance to provide for five off -sale liquor licenses
within the City. "All Councilmembers voted 'yes.'"
J
The City Administrator has asked the Police Department to give
consideration to a proposed regulatory change in removing the
present ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor license. A
response prepared by the Chief of Police is enclosed on page
3Z7 for your review. There are no additional thoughts or •
staff background on this issue.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
ordinance amendment_ that would remove the ceiling or any regulation
on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that could be granted
within the City of Eagan.
3/
M
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
23 Nny 1986
TO: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Chief of Police
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
Chill nnella
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
AdmH.,1 .lUPYIn
KENNETH D.ASZMANN
ouml,.�r.Pmn
I have conferred with Captains Geagan and Aszmann about their
thoughts concerning additional liquor licenses within the City of
Eagan.
Our thoughts fall into three categories:
1. Those of a criminal nature, such as selling to minors. We now
try to control this by sending a minor in to purchase liquor
from each of the off sale liquor stores within the city. This
is done at random times during the year with emphasis on
checking each and every liquor establishment so that enforce-
ment is fair and equal. Additional liquor stores would only
take more time and effort as far as the police department is
concerned.
2. The necessary background checks done by this department on
each applicant for licensing. Captain Geagan will submit a
separate memo on this issue.
3. Noncriminal issues, which triggers in each of us our own
personal philosphies, such as, will Eagan appear to have an
awful lot of liquor establishments within the city and thus,
are we encouraging drinking by making it too available?, etc.,
etc.
In summary, the police department, as the enforcement arm of
the city, would not have a serious problem in enforcing the
laws governing the operation of off sale liquor stores.
n�'
i . Berthe
Jk
31/
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Seventeen
PROJECT 475/DANIEL DRIVE
B. Public Hearing for Project 475, Daniel Drive (Streets &
Utilities) --On May 21, the City Council received a feasibility
report for the proposed upgrading of Daniel Drive (formerly
South Wescott Hills Drive) necessary for the development of
the Northview Meadows Second Addition south of Northview Elementary
School. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the
feasibility report for the Council's information and reference
during the public hearing. All notices have been published
in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially assessed
property owners informing them of this public hearing. The
consulting engineering will be available to discuss in detail
• all aspects of this proposed project and will be available to
answer any questions of the Council and/or general public.
0
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 475 (Daniel Drive - streets and utilities)
and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans
and specifications.
33
REPORT
ON
DANIEL. DRIVE
0 UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
r
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
FILE No. 49395
eawdu - 9 `ftq weeu
SL Pa"4 M/wweeala
3 `/
Bonestroo, Ros
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612.6364600
May 22, 1986
Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Engineers & Architects
Re: Daniel Drive
Utility 6 Street Improvement
Project No. 475
File No. 49395
Dear Mayor and Council:
uuo G. Runrvrou,. P. E.
RW"" W. Rwrnr, PE.
J CL And"hi, P.E.
8m✓7uN A, LrmG,q. P,E.
Hrrhern E'. Turner, P.E.
lwreo ('. Uh✓rr IlL
Glenn R. CwY. P.E.
Avuh.4. GurJm. It E.
Ihmnm E. N.". II E.
R,, hu,d W. F.,e,, P..,
RUG,/ G. Shurw h,. I'. E.
Murrl/r L..So,.ulu. Ir.E.
IA.nWdG Hu, .,d, VE.
Jay A. 0 ... dmr, V. E.
AIu,Y A. llumun. P.E.
7,d K. IJJ✓: V.F.
Mrrhurl 7'. Ruuurrunrr. It 1.
NUMv/ R. /'Ir//rr4. I'. 1:,
M.'d O. Lm1uw. P E.
/Aurum k', Prrrnun. It E.
Ahchuw C. L'n'h, HR.
Aurrn L. Illlhr, V1.
Jmnr, R. ArWun 1, PF
A'rwmh P. And" nini, Il L.
A'rvh A. HUJurwmi, Pl:.
Mm1 R. Rule, PE.
Rnhrn ('. HurrrY. A.I.A.
7hurrrv/ E. A.,,,, P.E:
I hudn d. Frulvm
I e. M. Pe.0A.
imnun 11. (llvm
Sown AL Ehrrnn
Transmitted herewith is our report for Daniel Drive, Project No. 475. This
report covers sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer and street construction
and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
EONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
-7�� A"4 -
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws' of tha StatMinnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
Date: May 22, 1986 Reg. No. 14260
n'
Approved by:
Department of P" lic Works _
Date:
5294d
35` .
F- 1
LJ
0
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main, storm sewer, and street for Daniel Drive. Daniel Drive serves as the
southwesterly boundary of Northview Meadows an existing single family develop-
ment, and the proposed single family development Northview Meadows 2nd Addi-
tion. The property southwesterly of Daniel Drive is unplatted and undeveloped
property presently zoned for commercial and light business use.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plan for
® the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes constructing an 8"
PVC sanitary sewer in Daniel Drive to serve Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and
the abutting property to the southwest. The sanitary sewer is a continuation
of that sanitary sewer serving Northview Meadows Addition presently located in
the southerly portion of Daniel Drive formerly known as South Wescott Hills
Drive. It is intended the sanitary sewer will continue westerly as Daniel
Drive continues westerly to serve the adjacent property as it develops.
Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes constructing a 12" DIP water
main in Daniel Drive as shown on the attached drawing. The 12" water main
will connect to an existing 6" water main at Daniel Drive and Braddock Trail.
The 12" diameter main is required to serve the commercial property located
southwesterly of Daniel Drive. This 12" main will ultimately connect to the
existing trunk mains in Lexington Avenue and Co. Rd. No. 30. Also included is
the proper number of valves and hydrants. This area is located in the high
pressure zone and will experience static and residual pressure of approximate-
ly 74 psi and 68 psi respectively.
Page 1.
5294d _ /
Storm Sewer - Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing a storm sewer
in Curry Trail and modifications to the existing storm sewer presently serving
the existing Northview Meadows. The storm sewer under this project will be
constructed from the proposed outlet control structure on the south side of
Co. Rd. No. 30 to the south along a Lot line in Northview Meadows 2nd Addition
and will continue within Curry Trail to Daniel Drive as shown on the attached
drawing. This storm sewer will ultimately be extended to the south to provide
an outlet for Pond JP -28 when future development dictates the Pond JP -28 out-
let.
Modifications to the existing storm sewer serving Northview Meadows Addi-
tion is due to the realignment of Daniel Drive and the resulting reconstruc-
tion of .the Rogers Court and Trenton Trail intersections.
In addition, it is proposed that a dry ponding area be created as shown on
the attached drawing adjacent to Co. Rd. No. 30 designated as Pond JP -28A.
Design considerations for the pond are as follows:
Pond
NWL
HWL
Storage
Outflow
Designation
NWL Area I1WL
Area
(ac.ft.)
(cfs)
Pond JP -28A
940 0.1 ac. 951
1.4 ac.
8.6
20
To create Pond JP -28A, it will be necessary to construct an outlet control
structure within the existing 48" RCP culvert beneath Co. Rd. No. 30 to re-
strict the available flow down to 20 cfs. Restricting the flow through this
culvert will help to minimize any downstream drainage and erosion problems
north of Co. Rd. 30. In addition, it will require a smaller downstream storm
sewer pipe than the 42" shown on the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
Street - Street construction proposed herein includes constructing Daniel
Drive to a 9 ton design section 44' wide from about Rogers Court to the west
Page 2.
5294d
37
0
•
edge of the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition. The developer of the Northview
Meadows built the easterly half (22') of South Wescott Hills Road. This road
was to ultimately be upgraded to a 44' wide street when the adjacent .property
developed. The existing portion of South Wescott Hills Road adjacent the pro -
posed Northview Meadows Addition is proposed to be widened as part of this
project to complete the construction of South Wescott Hills Drive and rename
South Wescott Hills Drive to Daniel Drive. To improve traffic circulation. it
is proposed to revise the alignment of Daniel Drive from Braddock Trail south-
erly to a point where Rogers Court and Trenton Trail will connect to Daniel
Drive as shown on the attached drawing. This will discourage the future com-
mercial traffic from using the residential neighborhood streets. Trenton
Trail and Rogers Court will be reconstructed as 32' wide residential streets
in which the existing surface and curbing for old South Wescott Hills, Drive
will be utilized as much as possible.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AREA
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
5294d
CONSTRUCTION AREA
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
NORTHVIEW MEADOWS
Lot 23, Block 1
Lot 37, 38, 44, Block 4
Lot 1, Block 7
Page 3.
3�
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Sanitary Sewer $ 46,920
Water Main 67,500
Storm Sewer 78,650
Street - Trenton Trail 6 Rogers Court 23,440
Daniel Drive 152,530
TOTAL .......................................... $369,040
The total estimated project cost is $369,040 which includes contingencies
and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include
legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this re-
port in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs.
These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the
City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the
latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing.
SANITARY SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral sanitary
sewer on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of
Daniel Drive. Trunk area sanitary sewer was previously assessed.
WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral water main on
a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel
Drive. Trunk area water main was previously assessed.
STORM SEWER: It is proposed to assess the total cost of lateral storm sewer
on a front foot basis to the unplatted property located southwesterly of
Daniel Drive. Trunk area storm sewer for this area has not been assessed and
it is not proposed to be assessed until the unplatted parcels either develop
Page 4.
5294d
or a major trunk storm sewer project for this area is required. Northview
Meadows 2nd Addition will be assessed their trunk area storm sewer obligation
as part of the development agreement between the City and the developer.
STREET: It is proposed to assess the total cost of street on a front foot
basis to the abutting property. It is proposed to assess all lots within the
Northview Meadows 2nd Addition equally on a per lot basis their proportionate
share of the residential equivalent for that portion of Daniel Drive which
abuts that subdivision. The remaining cost of Daniel Drive will be assessed
entirely to the unplatted property located southwesterly of Daniel Drive. The
® total cost of reconstructing the Trenton Trail and Rogers Court extension to
Daniel Drive will also be assessed entirely to the unplatted property located
southwesterly of the Trenton Trail extension.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows:
A. SANITARY SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
B. WATER MAIN
® Lateral
Lateral Assessment
C. STORM SEWER
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
D. STREET
Lateral
Lateral Assessment
Project
Cost
$ 46,920
$ 46,920
$ 67,500
$ 67,500
$ 78,650
$ 78,650
$175,970
$175,970
There are no trunk funds required for this project.
Page 5.
5294d
0
Revenue Balance
$ 46,920
$ 46,920 - 0 -
$ 67,500
$ 67,500 - 0 -
$ 78,650
$ 78,650 - 0 -
$175,970
$175,970 - 0 -
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
open Bids/Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
Page 6.
5294d
T'
May 21, 1986
June 17, 1986
June 17, 1986
July 15, 1986
Fall, 1986
Summer, 1987
Springy 1988
E
•
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROSECT NO. 475
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920
Page 7.
5294d
�v
A. SANITARY SEWER
1,270
Lin.ft.
8" PVC Sanitary sewer, 15'-25'dp. in pl. @ $20.00/l.f.
$25,400
110
Lin.ft.
6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft.
1,100
3
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
2,700
®
30
Lin.ft.
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
1,800
2
Each
8"x 6" wye branch @ $50.00/each
100
15
Lin.ft.
6" PVC riser pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft.
150
2
Each
Connect 8" PVC to existing 8" PVC @ $500.00/each
1,000
100
Cu.yds.
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
1,000
1,120
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,120
Total
$34,370
+5% Contingencies
1,720
$36,090
®
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
10,830
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $46,920
Page 7.
5294d
�v
B. WATER MAIN
1,620
Lin.ft.
12" DIP Water wain @ $20.00/lin.ft.
$32,400
180
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Water main @ $12.00/lin.ft.
2,160
2
Each
hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each
2,000
2
Each
12" Butterfly valve 5 box @ $800.00/each
1,600
5
Each
6" Resilient wedge gate valve 6 box @ $400.00/each
2,000
5,100
Lbs.
Fittings in place @ $1.50/lb.
7,050
2
Each
Connect 12" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each
500
1
Each
Connect 6" DIP to existing 6" DIP @ $500.00/each
500
1,240
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,240
Total
$49,450
+5% Contingencies
2,470
$51,920
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
15,580
TOTAL WATER MAIN ....................................
$67,500
5294d
Page 8.
P
•
Page 9.
5294d
0T
C. STORM SEWER
150
Lin.ft.
30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @$38.00/lin.ft.
$ 5,700
650
Lin.ft.
18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft.
18,200
560
Lin.ft.
15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
13,440
70
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $20.00/lin.ft.
1,400
5
Each
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each
5,500
2
Each
Std. CBMH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
1,800
7
Each
Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each
5,600
LUMP
SUM
Construct outlet control structure in existing 48"
®
RCP @ Co. Rd. No. 30 @ $3,000.00/L.S.
3,000
2
Each
Reconstruct existing CB as MH @ $500.00/each
1,000
1
Each
Connect to existing storm sewer @ $500.00/each
500
4
Cu.yds.
Rock rip rap @ $50.00/cu.yd.
200
1,280
Lin.ft.
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
1,280
Total
$57,620
+5% Contingencies
2,880
$60,500
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
18,150
TOTAL STORM SEWER ...................................
$78,650
Page 9.
5294d
0T
D. STREET
a.
Trenton
Trail Extended 6 Rogers Court
1,400
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd.
$ 1,400
550
Sq.yds.
Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd.
1,100
90
Lin.ft.
Remove concrete curb and gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft.
270
200
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
600
100
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
600
500
Ton
Class 5 100% crushed aggregate base @ $7.50/ton
3,750
110
Ton
2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton
1,320
110
Ton
2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton
1,430
12
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton
2,160
60
Ton
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal.
90
600
Lin.ft.
8618 Concrete curb and gutter @ $5.00/lin.ft.
3,300
5
Each
Adjust MH, CB 6 GV box @ $150.00/each
750
0.4
Acre
Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000/ac.
400
Total
$17,170
+5G Contingencies
860
•
$18,030
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
5,410
TOTAL..............................................
$23,440
Page 10.
5294d 05
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200
TOTAL............................................. $152,530
Page 11.
5294d A
b.
Daniel Drive
2,000
Cu.yds.
Common excavation @ $2.50/cu.yd.
$ 5,000
8,000
Sq.yds.
Subgrade preparation @ $1.00/sq.yd.
8,000
600
Sq.yds.
Remove bituminous pavement @ $2.00/sq.yd.
1,200
240
Lin.ft.
Remove concrete curb S gutter @ $3.00/lin.ft.
720
400
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $3.00/cu.yd.
1,200
200
Cu.yds.
Select granular borrow @ $6.00/cu.yd.
1,200
6,000
Ton
Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton
30,000
1,300
Ton
2331 Bituminous base course @ $12.00/ton
15,600
650
Ton
2341 Bituminous wear course @ $13.00/ton
8,450
110
Ton
Bituminous material for mixture @ $180.00/ton
19,800
400
Gals.
Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal.
600
3,050
Lin.ft.
B618 concrete curb 6 gutter @ $5.50/lin.ft.
16,775
12
Each
Adjust MH, CB b GV box @ $150.00/each
1,800
1.4
Acre
Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac.
1,400
Total
$111,745
+5% Contingencies
5,585
®
$117,330
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 35,200
TOTAL............................................. $152,530
Page 11.
5294d A
A. SANITARY SEWER
Parcel
Description
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
B. WATER MAIN
NE 1/4. SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
C. STORM SEWER
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
Parcel 013-02
Parcel 010-03
Parcel 013-05
Wp**W9•J
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 475
Assessable
Footage
100
720
160
980
520
720
160
150
1,550
520
720
160
530
1,930
Page 12.
Y/
Rate/F.F.
$47.88
47.88
47.88
$43.55
43.55
43.55
43.55
$40.75
40.75
40.75
40.75
Total
Assessment
$ 4,788
34,472
7,660
$46;920
$22,645
31,355
6,968
6,532
$67,500
$21,191
29,341
6,520
21,598
$78,650
1-74
0
D. STREET
a.) Trenton Trail Extended 5 Ro¢er's Court
Parcel
Assessable
Total
Description
Footage
Rate/F.F.
Assessment
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 013-05
420
$55.81
$23,440
420
$23,440
b.) Daniel Drive
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01
57.0
$80.85
$ 42,043
Parcel 013-02
720
80.85
58,213
Parcel 010-03
160
80.85
12,936
Parcel 013-05
150
80.85
12,128
Northview Meadows 2nd Addition
1,130
24.08(l)
27,210
2,680
$152,530
(1) Assessment rate equals residential equivalent (32') from the Trunk as-
sessment Rates Utilities and Streets, Eagan, Minnesota 1986 and does not
include costs associated with grading.
5294d
Page 13.
Ve
SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 375
Parcel Sanitary Water
Description Sewer Main
NE 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 012-01 $ 4,788
Parcel 013-02 34,472
Parcel 010-03 7,660
Parcel 013-05
Northview Meadows 2nd Addition
Lots 1-24, Block 1 &
Lots 1-14, Block 2
$22,645
31,355
6,968
6,532
Storm
Sewer
$21,191
29,341
6,520
21,598
$46,920 $67,500 $78,650
Page 14.
5294d
Street
$42,043
58,213
12,936
35,568
Total
Assessment
$ 90,667
153,381
34,084
63,698
27,210 27,210
$175,970 $369,040
1]
0
•
U
010-76
010.03
DIFFLEY ROAD
010-75
010.76
(COUNTY ROAD No. 30)
s
7 • � r
•
.O F( R H Ell
• (` 1x O \
x • n w .e
n v
_
, TR IL
1 • n q
/ D4N/E' r O Zn 1i n Q ie ~ j
IY
U i
PROPOSED
oq xx 1. m
8" SANITARY == e i
SEWER �o13-o2 i0
eq
s
010.04
0 100 200 300
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
OPOSED N
SANITARY t
.WER
EXISTING
SANITARY
SEWER "
u n
n •
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minn.
Date'. MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 1
Comm. 49396
010.78 010.77 1 010-75
DIFFLEY ROAD
I(COUNTY ROADI No. 30) 16
tY• � v
R H E
.. •O ,o e • r o \ r
PL • \ oMADOki
O
a a n ,a ie i u
1
_ x •�rj TR IL 'i u
u
YOR'KT WN
•
W 4 io • Y
U m u
u a, u
v z
PROPOSED o x• I Ei r
Y
1211 WATER MAIN
,v • J 10
I Q I
013-02 a zv /
010-03
16 _ ex
xx
• H
POn8
w-ze
NYL. 959.0
HWL, 969
I
®s
010-09
D 100 200 300
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WATER MAIN
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN. MINNESOTA
n
ooi n
x Oj O ,• eo
012-01 v
EXISTING` `-�A
WATER MAIN C'
' O
\ a
1
00-05 p ��
H n
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
A ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul Minn
Date: MAY, loos FIG. No. 2
Comm. 49395
010-0e 010-77
OIo-75
OUTLET
CONTROL
STRUCTURE
ol0-16
DIFF�EY ROAD
(COUNTY ROADFNO301
I—EXISTING 48 RCP
I
.0
PROPOSED ����— l
POND JP-28A
NWL°940.0 HWL•951.0 , � • Y ,
x,
STORAGE ° 8.6 Acre-Feet
�
R H E
00 IB 'o
PL
• • x • '• ,•
° mM DWS
'
• 9i
u =•
O
:
,
, • u
w .e w w V u
• , flirj
n
TR IL
�YORKT WNL PL.
11 19
PROPOSED \\
o
STORM SEWER \\
'Fi r'
i\
QR .° ii • , i• W
xa14Q
\ 015-02
xo
010-03
24
FUTURE
STORM SEWER
u a ,
vor.o
jv.ze
DD/T/
NWL. 956.0
l O Q ,• ,o
HW L . 969!
012.01 .•
EXISTING
__
STORM '
•Poe " {"
' PROPOSED
SEWER c�
STORM SEWER
5
i
®,.
u
u \\•
PONO
JP 50 ///
a• SR
••
MW1. 964.0
HWL, 9TI.T
a• .( N
H
REMOVE to
Ex. CB 9 ,
BUILD MH i
CONSTRUCT CB
OVER EK. PIPE 9
se
,x
010-04
013-05 o
PROPOSED
0 100 200 300
vm�
w u
STORM SEWER
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
,• '•
DANIEL DRIVE
BONESTROO• ROSENE, ANDERLIK
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
STORM SEWER
St. Paul, Minn.
PROJECT No. 475
Date:
MAY, 198s FIG. No. :3]
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Comm. 49395
010.19
010-05
010-n
DIFFLEY ROAD
r • ,
• E�
N
1,
5) Oj i,
� � 10 �x x° • Y w
� U i• u R
u xl r � LL
•F/ T` 5
O xx I' -I Y
i, I io
x] , 1• Q
013-02 ,° I
It
x. n
u
vono
PROPOSE
�P.29 STREET i,' ' oDiri
MW L. 99E.0 IPAPROVE ENTQQ - ' O O 1•
nwl 04Y.4 / b(2-01
44� F -F ., RE
�`� ` ••gyp Ct4.
EXISTING STREET TO ;
BE REMOVE 4
0 ,
„
0q 32'F -F
a
010.04
0 100 200 300
GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET
DANIEL DRIVE
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
STREETS
PROJECT No. 475
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
010-75
010-i6
(COUNTY ROAD No. 30)
,
1
EXISTING STREET TO °
BE REMOVED 1x
015 -05 u
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
& ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul. Minn.
Date: MAY, 1988 FIG. No. 4
Comm. 49395
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eighteen
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 458
C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 458 (Eagandale Center
Industrial Park - Storm Sewer) --With the discovery of the inad-
vertent ommissions of mailed notifications for the original public
hearing held on January 21, 1986 for this project, it is inap-
propriate to continue with the proposed final assessments until
such time that the initial public hearing, process can be properly
completed. Subsequently, the City Council set a new public hearing
to consider the merits of this project to be heard on July 1,
1986. If at the conclusion of that public hearing the project
is approved, it would be appropriate to then consider the proposed
• final assessments for Project 458.
L J
Enclosed on pages Js andis a copy of the letter that
was sent by registered mail o all affected property owners,
informing them of this revised hearing process for both the original
public hearing and the proposed final assessment hearing. Based
on this action and information that has been forwarded, staff
is recommending that the Council close the public hearing and
not take any action regarding this assessment role until the
public hearing process can be completed and fully compliedwith.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
for final assessments for Project 458 (Eagandale Center Industrial
Park - Storm Sewer-).
617"
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, PO. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE (612)454-8100 REGISTERED MAIL THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
June 10, 1986 MC.EUUSON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Members
MAS
He: Project 458, Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Storm Sever c� ;aGoB
NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED HEARING DATE EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
Ciry Clem
Dear Property Owner:
As a result of ongoing analysis relating to the continued growth of our
community, and in particular, development within the Eagandale Center
Industrial Park, the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department
determined that there may be a need for additional storm sewer facilities
within this Industrial Park to handle the additional development. On August
6, 1985, the Council authorized the preparation of a preliminary feasibility
report to.further evaluate these needs. On November 19, the Council received
the completed feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing to be held
on January 21, 1986, to discuss the results of this report with all the
affected property owners who would be benefitted by these proposed
improvements and correspondingly assessed for its related costs. A copy of
this report is enclosed for your information.
It was recently discovered that several property owners were inadvertently
omitted from the notification process of that January 21 public hearing.
Because of the City Council and staff's desire to ensure that all property
owners within the benefitted drainage district are provided every opportunity
to discuss this proposed improvement and the related assessments prior to
formal action ordering the related storm sewer construction, a new public
hearing date has been scheduled.
Recently, you should .have received a notice of a final assessment hearing for
the June 17 City Council meeting relating to this project. Due to the City's
discovery of the inadvertent omission of previous notification regarding the
original public hearing, the City has rescheduled both the public hearing to
consider the installation of this project and the related final assessment
hearing to July 1, 1986. Enclosed with this letter are two Notices of Hearing
which supersede any notices that you may have received at an earlier time
regarding Project 458. These notices are summarized as follows:
1. A Notice of Public Hearing scheduled for July 1, 1986, at 7:00 p.m.,
at the Eagan Municipal Center, at which time the City Council will
discuss the merits of the proposed project and determine whether or
not this project should be constructed.
2. A Notice of Assessment Hearing also scheduled for July 1, 1986, at
7:00 p.m., at the Eagan Municipal Center, which will follow the
above -referenced initial public hearing. If the project is approved
as a result of the public hearing, the City Council will then
determine whether the assessments to finance this project should be
adopted as proposed. �5
THE LONE OAK TREE.. THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
June 10, 1986
Page 2
Unless the Council can be assured that this project will be financed without
objections to special assessments from the property within the drainage
district, it is questionable whether this project will be improved for
construction. If this project is not approved, the City will have to consider
placing a moratorium on all future development within this drainage district
until such time that adequate drainage facilities can be provided. If both
the public and final assessment hearing are concluded without any written
objections being submitted, the Council will consider awarding the contract
which would allow construction to begin by the middle of July.
In order to provide more detailed information, I would like to schedule an
informal informational meeting to be held at 1:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall on
Tuesday, June 24, 1986. Hopefully, all your questions and concerns can be
adequately addressed at that meeting and any unresolved issues can be
discussed at the formal hearings on July 1. •
IN SUMMARY, ALL PREVIOUS NOTICES REGARDING PROJECT 458 SHOULD BE DISREGARDED
AND THE SCHEDULE THAT IS PROVIDED BY THE ENCLOSED NOTICES AND DISCUSSED HEREIN
SHOULD NOW CONTROL.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or concerns you may
have regarding this letter or the upcoming meetings.
Sincerely
'T o.as A. Colbert, P.E.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney
Mark Hanson, Consulting Design Engineer
Deanna Kivi, Special Assessment Clerk
Enclosure
r
5�
ALSCOR INV JNT VENTURE
C/O OPUS CORP
BOX 150
MPLS MN 55440
NW MUTUAL LIFE INS CO
720 E WISCONSIN AVE
MILWAUKEE WI 53200
ELLIOTT AUTO SUPPLY CO INC
2855 EAGANDALE BLVD
*AN MN 55121
ALSCOR INV
800 OPUS CTR
9900 BREN RD E
MINNETONKA MN 55343
AM FRUIT & PRODUCE CO
4 EAGANDALE BLVD
PAUL MN 55121
CHICAGO TUBE & IRON CO MN
2940 EAGANDALE RD
ST PAUL MN 55121
TERRENCE M & DENNIS
STEVENS
2935 SERVICE RD W
EAGAN MN 55121
i
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nineteen
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING/PROJECT 471
D. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 471, West Service Drive
(Storm Sewer) ---In response to a petition and waiver of hearing
submitted by Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance (owners of affected
lots), the Council authorized a feasibility and detailed plan
preparation for the lateral extension of the storm sewer facilities.
along the West Service Drive towards I -35E. Due to the fact
that this project is not feasible unless Project 458, as previously
discussed, is approved', it would be inappropriate to adopt the
final assessment roll prior to the conclusion of the public hearing
process for Project 45'8. Also, with the public hearing process
being properly compliedwith regarding this project, a continuation
of this final assessment hearing to the July 1 meeting would
be appropriate..
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the public
hearing for Project 471 (West Service Drive - Storm Sewer) until
July 1, 1986.
M
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty
PROJECT 444R/HOLLAND LAKE
E. Public Hearing for Project 444R (Holland Lake - Trunk Storm
Sewer Outlet) --On May 21, the Council received the revised feasi-
bility report for the above -referenced project and scheduled the
public hearing to be held on June 17. Enclosed on pages
through oD is a copy of this report for the Council's review
reference during this public hearing process. All property owners
proposed to be assessed by this project have been noticed and
informed of this public hearing. Representatives of the County
Park Department will also be in attendance regarding their relation-
ship to this project.
Several meetings have been held with the property owners in the
Lakewood Hills Addition regarding permission to perform preliminary •
survey work in anticipation of this project progression. In
addition, on Wednesday evening, June 11, a neighborhood meeting
was held at which time our consulting engineer reviewed this
proposed project with the affected property owners. Our consultant
will be available to further discuss and answer any questions
relating to this project that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve/deny Project 444R (Holland Lake, - Trunk Storm Sewer
Outlet) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed
plans and specifications.
•
_6�
REPORT
ON
HOLLAND LAKE AREA
® TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT No. 4448
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1955
FILE No. 49355
/3o aa, Rte, f4mJ44" & 4&"c&-tes, Sow.
94 Pa"4 Mow a&
to
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612636.4600
May 14, 1986
Honorable Mayor 6 Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Engineers & Architects
Re: Holland Lake Area
Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements
Project No. 444R
Our File No. 49355
Dear Mayor and Council:
On. G, tlunauau, PE
kuhrr, W. Nwrnr. PE.
J -,,h C. Andrlhk. P.E.
BraJJwd A. LrmArr,, P.E.
R,,hurd E. Turn,, P E,
Jau'e+C. Ohm. P.E.
Glenn R. C.A. P.E.
Ari,S A. GurJun. Y.C.
Thumm E. Nuyn. P.C.
Rahard W. h'werr. P.E.
Raker, G. S9unirhl, Y.E.
At.,. L. S.,Mw. P.E.
Cbnald C. B.,.,dl. P.E.
Jerry A. B ... dan, P.E.
Murk A. Hawun. P.E.
T,d A'. h,ld. P. E.
M,hA d7 Nuunnunn. P.E.
Ru Mal N, PJryl,ln ISE.
tkrv,d G. LmAwa, P.E.
Th.. W. Pn,+an, P.E
Mahal C. L,n,h, PE
A'urrn L. Willi+, P.E.
Jaron R. Mulund, P.E.
A'rnne,h P. Andenun, P.E.
A'n,h A. tlurhnwnn, P.E.
Murk N. Rul/+, Y.E.
R.b ,, C. R.,k, A.I.A.
Thwnu+E. A.,m, P.E.
SmR L. Yaan,. P.E.
Charly A. ErirA,ua
Lru Al. Pu.rhky
Iludm At oh.
SuAon M. EGdin
Transmitted herewith is our report for Holland Lake Area Project No. 444R trunk
storm sewer improvements.
This report discusses trunk storm sewer improvements in the Holland Lake area
and presents cost estimates and also included is a preliminary assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws
✓fof Oe StateofMinnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
Date/e: �MMaay 14, 1986 Reg. No. 14260
Approved by: r � 4";t ���lV/
Department of Public Works"
Date: 6—
5153d 61
30 Year
Anniversaryr
r1
LJ
r
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer in the
southeastern portion of the City in the vicinity of Holland Lake. The project
proposes, to construct storm sewer outlets for Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69,
LP -37, and LP -51 as designated in the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. An
alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm sewer out-
let for Pond LP -36. These ponds are presently land locked and are receiving
storm water runoff from the existing developments adjacent to Wilderness Run
Road (Wedgewood Addition, Sheffield Addition, Oakwood Heights, and Fawn
Ridge). In addition, the lift station to control Schwanz Lake (Pond LP -32)
an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut-
ting Schwanz Lake.
The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and
LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support-
ing residential homes.
which is pumped
ultimately
to Pond LP -61 has been turned off because of the
standpoint and can
best be carried out as one
contract. The project slightly
modifies the 1984
present lack of
storage in
Pond LP -61. !•_s a result, Schwanz Lake hasrisento
an elevation which is impacting recent improvements to Trapp Farm Park abut-
ting Schwanz Lake.
The property abutting Ponds LP -61, LP -46, LP -69, LP -37, LP -35, LP -36, and
LP -51 are for the most part either large platted or unplatted parcels support-
ing residential homes.
would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff
through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota
County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve,
maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes
through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There-
fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in -
Page 1.
5153d 6-2,-
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project
is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and can
best be carried out as one
contract. The project slightly
modifies the 1984
Comprehensive Storm Sewer
Plan. This Comprehensive Plan
would have provided for collection of Dakota County Park surface water runoff
through designed outlets for Holland Lake and McDonough Lake. However, Dakota
County has indicated they do not wish to be included in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system at this time. It's their desire to independently preserve,
maintain and control the water quantity and quality concerns of their lakes
through their own internal management plan for this regional parkland. There-
fore, it is proposed not to include Dakota County Park in the City of Eagan
storm sewer system. This project will still allow Dakota County Park to in -
Page 1.
5153d 6-2,-
corporate any portion of their internal storm water management into our trunk
system at some future time provided it pays its trunk area trunk sewer assess-
ment for that area which would benefit from the City's storm sewer system.
However, because this storm sewer project will not be designed for excess ca-
pacity to include future Dakota County Park drainage, it would only be permit-
ted to drain into the storm sewer system during off peak dry periods when the
City's storm sewer system is not being utilized for its own needs. Revision
from the Comprehensive Plan therefore include the following:
1) The gravity storm sewer outlet from Pond LP -34 will be directed to Pond
LP -46 instead of Pond LP -35.
2) Ponds LP -35 and LP -36 will not have the availability of a gravity outlet 0
due to elevation constraints. Therefore, the outlet for this area re-
quires a lift station and force main located in the northwest corner of
Pond LP -36 discharging into the gravity line between Pond LP -46 to LP -37
which is proposed as an alternate to this feasibility report.
3) The gravity storm sewer from Pond LP -46 will be directed to Pond LP -37 in
lieu of the proposed east -west storm sewer along Cliff Road.
4) Dakota County Park runoff is not included in the capacity designs of City
of Eagan storm sewer system. 0
DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer
in the Holland Lake area. It is proposed to construct a gravity storm sewer
from Pond LP -34 (located immediately south of Pond LP -61) to Pond LP -46
through Lakewood Hills Addition as shown on the attached drawing. A short
gravity line will also be constructed to the north from Pond LP -34 to Pond
LP -61 to control the elevation and storage within Pond LP -61. It is also pro-
posed that a gravity storm sewer line be constructed from Pond LP -46 to Pond
LP -37 to Pond LP -51 as shown on the attached drawing,
5153d
Page 2.
�3
Pond LP -51 will be controlled by a lift station pumping through a force
main constructed westerly along Cliff Road discharging into a gravity storm
sewer at Ches Mar Drive. The gravity storm sewer from Che.s Mar Drive will
then be constructed westerly along Cliff Road and discharge into the existing
storm sewer located within the ravine in the well site area. It is further
proposed to complete the storm sewer within the well site as shown on the at-
tached drawing. This includes constructing a gravity storm sewer within the
westerly ravine extended southerly to.the existing 60" diameter culvert under
Cliff Road near Pilot Knob Road.
® Included in Table A is a listing of those ponds which are proposed to have
outlets constructed as part of this project and the specific design considera-
tions regarding each pond. As noted in this Table, 3 ponds are protected wet-
lands controlled by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Therefore, a
permit will be required from the DNR prior to constructing the outlet for
these ponds.
An alternate is also included which provides for constructing a storm
sewer outlet for Pond LP -36. The gravity outlet for Pond LP -46 to LP -37 will
® be constructed adjacent to Pond LP -36 at an elevation of approximately 879.
However, the normal water elevation as proposed in the Comprehensive Storm
Sewer Plan for Pond LP -36 is 862.0. Therefore, a small lift station and force
main is required which will discharge into the gravity storm sewer between
Pond LP -46 and LP -37. Presently, McDonough Lake (Pond LP -45) located in
Dakota County Park south of Cliff Road does outlet into the drainage area
tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. Therefore, extremely high water elevations
have resulted in Pond LP -35 and LP -36. However, because Dakota County Park
has indicated they will ultimately contain their own storm water runoff within
the park, design considerations for the lift station for Pond LP -36 includes
Pi 3.
5153d b�7/"
TABLE A
POND DATA
Page 4.
5153d ® 0
Comp.
i
Comp.
Existing
Comp.
Comp.
Plan
Proposed
Plan
Proposed
Pond
Level
DNR
Plan
Proposed
Plan
Proposed
Storage
Storage
Outflow
Outflow
No.
5/66
NOHW
NTATL
NWL
HWL
HVL
(Ac -Ft) -
(Ac -Ft)
(cfs)
cfs)-
Pond
LP -34
885.6
NA
879.0
882.7
888.5
890
20.3
16.7
6.0
5.19
Pond
LP -35
872.7
NA
870.5
870.5
880.0
873.0
22.6
2.5
11.1
0.5
Pond
LP -36
867.5
NA
862.0
862.0
864.5
864.5
5.5
5.5
0
0.5
Pond
LP -37
881.5
879.6
878.3
878.3
880.6
882.8
8.6
18.2
1.0
* 5.97
Pond
LP -46
883.3
879.4
879.2
879.2
881.5
884.0
17.8
39.9
1.0
* 5.24
Uk
Pond
LP -51
867.7
NA
865.0
867
878.5
880
12.8
17.0
6.0
7.0
Pond
LP -61
885.3
884.8
884.4
884.4
888.5
890.0
36.4
52.5
6.0
5.19
Page 4.
5153d ® 0
only the drainage area tributary to Pond LP -35 and LP -36. In addition to the
lift station and force main construction, a gravity storm sewer draining the
low area north of Pond LP -35 to Pond LP -35 and an access road to serve the
lift station will be required.
EASEMENTS: Easements
required for this
project are as follows:
A.) BASE PROJECT
Parcel
Permanent
Temporary
Description
Owner
(Acre)
(Acre)
SE 1/4, SECTION 26
LAKEWOOD HILLS
South Part Lot 4
Russell Agrimson
0.05
0.12
Lot 10
Russell Agrimson
0.05
0.12
Lot 11
Lloyd Wills
0.04
0.16
Lot 13
Gustav Degler
0.07
0.20
Lot 14
Russell Agrimson
0.05
0.16
Outlot A
Samuel Rockwood
0.01
0.02
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Lot 1 (013-00)
Samuel Rockwood
0.14
0.35
Lot 5 (055-00)
Tom Steinmuller
0.25
1.1
SW 1/4, SECTION 26
Parcel 010-56 Paul Johnson 0.09 0.25
Parcel 014-55 Linda Jones 0.09 0.25
Parcel 020-53 Albert Carlson 1.0 --
1.84 2.73
B.) ALTERNATE PROJECT
SE 1/4, SECTION 26
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Lot 14 Russell Agrimson 0.05 0.12
Lot 15 (S. 250') Robert Ferguson 0.035 0.10
Lot 15 (N. 250') Helen Undis 0.035 0.10
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Part of Lot 5 (051-00) Sally Beauchemin 0.10
0.22
0_20
0.52
Assuming a cost of $7,000/acre for permanent easement and $2„000/acre for
temporary easement, it is estimated the total cost for easement acquisition is
$18,340 for the base project while for the alternate is $2,060.
Page 5.
5153d
M
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
SWC SECTION 25
Parcel 014-50
Parcel 014-51
SES SECTION .26
Parcel 018-75
Parcel 019-75
Parcel 020-75
Parcel 021-75
Parcel 022-75
Parcel 021-77
Parcel 030-77
ASSESSMENT
AND CONSTRUCTION
AREA
SA SECTION 26
WILDERNESS
RETREAT
Parcel
010-51
Lot 1 (013-00)
Parcel
020-51
Part Lot 5
(055-00)
Parcel
011-52
Part Lot 5
(052-00)
Parcel
010-53
Part Lot 5
(051-00)
Parcel
020-53
Parcel
010-54
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Parcel
013-55
Lot 1-20
Parcel 014-55
Parcel 010-56 OAK POND HILLS
Lots 1 & 2, Block 1
Lots 1 & 2, Block 2
OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION
Lot 1-4, Block 1
Lot 1-2, Block 2
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. The total estimated project cost for the base proj-
ect is $763,850 while the alternate, if included, is an additional $72,450.
Each of these cost estimates includes contingencies and all related overhead.
Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and include legal, engineering, adminis-
tration, and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at
the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess-
ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef-
fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a
period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The
Page 6.
5153d 47
I*
interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final
assessment hearing.
Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as-
sessments. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those
areas proposed to be assessed as part of the base project and the alternate
project. In the event the alternate project is not approved, those properties
proposed to be assessed as part of the alternate will not be assessed. All
property located north of Cliff Road is either existing residential or poten-
tial future residential property. Therefore, these areas are proposed to be
assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area
storm sewer. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs.
As previously indicated, Dakota County Park is not included as part of
this project. However, in the future if they elect to be included they would
be assessed for that area which would benefit from the Eagan storm sewer sys-
tem. The area to be assessed would be assessed in accordance with the City
policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer to regional parks.
TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are
® as follows:
TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER
Residential $0.050/sq.ft.
Homesteaded Large Lots
Page 7.
5153d 4f
$0.050/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft.
of each acre)
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows:
Trunk Storm Sewer
Easement
Project Cost
Base Alternate
$763,850 $72,450
18,340 2,060
Revenue Balance
Base Alternate Base Alternate
Trunk Area Assmts. $172,525 $212213
TOTAL $782,190 $74,510 $172,525 $21,213 -$609,665 -$53,297
It is anticipated -$609,665 will be required from the trunk storm sewer
fund for the base project while the alternate project is is estimated $53,297
will be required. It should be noted, however, if Dakota County Park elects
to be included in the City of Eagan storm sewer system sometime in the future, t
their assessment would be used to help defer the deficit presented herein. In
addition, it should be noted many of the new developments upstream have previ-
ously been assessed for trunk area storm sewer for future trunk improvements j
such as this project. Therefore, those surplus assessments will be used to
offset the deficit presented herein, a
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Acquire Easements
Approve plans and Specifications
Receive Bids
Award Contract
Construction Completion
Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
Page 8.
5153d 0
May 20, 1986
June 17, 1986
Summer, 1986
August, 1986
September, 1986
September, 1986
Spring, 1987
Summer, 1987
May, 1988
5153d
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
HOLLAND LAKE AREA
'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS
PROJECT NO. 444
30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
BASE PROJECT
.24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
400
Lin.ft.
94,000
610
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
2,350
Lin.ft.
158,100
100
Lin.ft.
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
550
Lin.ft.
3,600
5,270
Lin.ft.
®
3,000
12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each
1,200
80
Lin.ft.
Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S.
14
Each
1,000
60
Lin.ft.
Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton
LUMP
SUM
4,000
6
Each
Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft.
3
Each
1,500
4,400
Cu.yds.
Total
LUMP
SUM
29,100
2
Each
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
1
Each
$763,850
600
Ton
•
400
Cu.yds.
15
Acres
800
Lin.ft.
500
Sq.yds.
9,280
Lin.ft.
5153d
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
HOLLAND LAKE AREA
'TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVfiMENTS
PROJECT NO. 444
30" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
24,000
.24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
18,300
18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $40.00/lin.ft.
94,000
15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft.
2,400
12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft.
24,200
18" DIP Force main in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft.
158,100
Jack or auger 18" DIP Force main @ $135.00/lin.ft.
10,800
Std. 4' dia. MH w/cstg. @ $900.00/each
12,600
MH depth greater than 8' dp. @ $60.00/lin.ft.
3,600
Submersible lift sta. (Pond LP -51) @ $170,000/L.S.
170,000
18" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $500.00/each
3,000
12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $400.00/each
1,200
Pond excavation @ $3.00/cu.yd.
13,200
Clear and grub trees @ $8,000.00/L.S.
8,000
Connect 24" RCP to existing MH & RCP @ $500.00/each
1,000
Connect 30" RCP to existing culvert @ $2,000.00/ea.
2,000
Class 2 aggregate base for shouldering @ $7.00/ton
4,200
Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd.
4,000
Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/ac.
15,000
Silt fence material for erosion @ $2.00/lin.ft.
1,600
Sod w/topsoil @ $3.00/sq.yd.
1,500
Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft.
9,280
Total
$581,980
+5% Contingencies
29,100
$611,080
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
152,770
TOTAL .............................................
$763,850
Page 9.
70
ALTERNATE - POND LP -36 'OUTLET
300
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm sewer @ $32.00/lin.ft.
50
Lin.ft.
6" DIP Force main @ $12.00/lin.ft.
1
Each
Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,000.00/each
LUMP
SUM
Submersible lift station Pond LP -36 @ $30,000.00/L.S.
LUMP
SUM -
Access road @ $10,000.00/L.S.
LUMP
SUM
Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S.
1.0
Acre
Seed w/mulch & fertilizer @ $1,000.00/Acre
Total
+5% Contingencies
+25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest
TOTAL ALTERNATE ....................................
Page 10.
5153d
$ 9,600
600
1,000
30,000
10,000
3,000
1.000
$55,200
2,760
$57,960
14.490
$72,450
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
HOLLAND LAKE AREA OUTLET
PROJECT NO. 444
SA SECTION 26
Parcel
010-51
261,360
Total
193,090
Assessable
9,655
Parcel
Future R/W (20%)
Area
Credit
Area
Assessment
Total
94,500
Description
40,380
(sq.ft.)
(Sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate
Assessment
Pond (20,000)
SW%'SECTION 25
$0.050/s.f.
10,278
Future R'/W (20%)
Parcel
014-50
1,584,000
Pond (64,000)
1,216,000
$0.050/s.f.
$ 60,800
66,000
$0.050/s.f.
3,300
Future R/W (20%)
Parcel
014-51
176,000
Pond (74,000)
102,000
$0.050/s.f.
5,100
SE% SECTION 26
Parcel
018-75
1,050
---
1,050
$0.050/s.f.
53
Parcel
019-75
2,475
---
2,475
$0.050/s.f.
124
Parcel
020-75
12,000
---
12,000
$0.050/s.f.
600
Parcel
021-75
3,600
---
3,600
$0.050/,s.f.
180
Parcel
022-75
3,400
---
3,400
$0.050/s.f.
170
Parcel
021-77
123,000
Pond (37,000)
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
1,650
Large Lot
Parcel
030-77
52,000
Large Lot
24,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,247
SA SECTION 26
Parcel
010-51
261,360
Pond (20,000)
193,090
$0.050/s.f.
9,655
Future R/W (20%)
Parcel
020-51
94,500
Large Lot
40,380
$0.050/s.f.
2,019,
Parcel
011-52
276,930
Pond (20,000)
205,550
$0.050/s.f.
10,278
Future R'/W (20%)
Parcel
010-53
158,700
Large Lot
66,000
$0.050/s.f.
3,300
Page 11.
5153d 7y
S
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Lot 1, 013-00
Part of Lot 5,
055-00
Part of Lot 5,
051-00
Part of Lot 5,
052-00,
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 8
5153d
234,000
Pond
Total
82,500
Assessable
Lot
Large
Parcel
Lot
Area
Credit
Area
Assessment
Total
Description
106,840
(sq..ft.)
(Sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate
Assessment
Parcel
020-53
133,500
----
133,500
$0.050/s.f.
6,675
Parcel
010-54
330,000
Future R/W (20%)
264,000
$0.050/s.f.
13,200
Parcel
013-55
145,200
Pond (56,000)
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
1,650
Large Lot
Parcel
014-55
222,750
Pond (72,000)
66,000
$0,.050/s.f.
3,300
Large Lot
Parcel
010-56
414,510
Future R/W (20%)
331,610
$0.050/s.f.
16,581
WILDERNESS RETREAT
Lot 1, 013-00
Part of Lot 5,
055-00
Part of Lot 5,
051-00
Part of Lot 5,
052-00,
LAKEWOOD HILLS
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
Lot 8
5153d
234,000
Pond
(32,000)
82,500
$0.50/s.f.
Lot
Large
Lot
Lot
190,000
384,120
Pond
(74,000)
248,090
$0.050/s.f.
106,840
Future
R/W (20%)
Large
225,000
Pond
(78,410)
65,410
$0.050/s.f.
Large
Large
Lot
Large
Lot
150,000
Pond
(7,000)
61,820
$0.050/s.f.
Large
Lot
64,710
Large
Lot
38,100
Large
Lot
38,700
Large
Lot
190,000
Pond
(66,000)
Large
Lot
106,840
Pond
(60,000)
Large
Lot
102,800
Pond
(32,000)
Large
Lot
23,290
Large
Lot
24,760
Large
Lot
Page 12.
73
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
16,500
$0,:050/s.f.
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
49,500
$0.050/s.f.
19,780 $0.050/s.f.
33,000 $0.050/s.f
16,500 $0.050/s.f.
16,500 $0.050/s.f.
4,125 AD
12,400
3,271(1)
3,091(1)
1,650
825
825
2,475
989
1,650
825
825
Page 13.
5153d /6
Total
Assessable
Parcel
Area
Credit
Area
Assessment
Total
Description
(sq.ft.)
(Sq.ft.)
(sq.ft.)
Rate
Assessment
Lot
9
23,580
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825
Lot
10
65,200
Large
Lot
33,000
$0.050/s.f.
1,650(1)
Lot
11
24,750
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
12
19,200
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
13
34,400
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
14
54,400
Large
Lot
27,340
$0.050/s.f.
1,367(1)
Lot
15
185,400
Pond
(16,000)
66,000
$0.050/s.f.
3,300(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
16
64,350
Pond
(37,600)
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
17
63,840
Pond
(32,800)
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
18
54,000
Pond
(8,000)
18,940
$0.050/s.f.
947(1)
Large
Lot
Lot
19
30,000
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Lot
20
48,230
Pond
(2,500)
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825(1)
Large
Lot
OAK
POND HILLS
Lot
1,
Block 1
46,800
Large
Lot
19,740
$0.050/s.f.
$ 987(1)
Lot
2,
Block 1
44,000
Large
Lot
16,940
$0.050/s.f.
847
Lot
1,
Block 2
43,560
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
$ 825(1)
Lot
2,
Block 2
44,000
Large
Lot
16,940
$0.050/s.f.
847
Page 13.
5153d /6
Total Assessable
Parcel Area Credit Area Assessment Total
Description (sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Rate Assessment
OAK POND HILLS 2ND ADDITION
Lot
1,
Block
1
54,000
Large
Lot
26,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,347
Lot
2,
Block
1
50,000
Large
Lot
22,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,147
Lot
3,
Block
1
74,000
Large
Lot
30,440
$0.050/s.f.
1,522
Lot
4,
Block
1
50,000
Large
Lot
22,940
$0.050/s.f.
1,147
Lot
1,
Block
2
43,650
Large
Lot
16,500
$0.050/s.f.
825
Lot
2,
Block
2
44,000
Large
Lot
16,940
$0.050/s.f.
847
TOTAL (BASE PROJECT) ............ $172,525
TOTAL (INCLUDES ALTERNATE 1) ..... $193,738
(1) Total assessment if alternate is approved.
9
•
Page 14.
5153d
75,
,
•
HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET
LIFT STATION AND FORCERAAIN
PROJECT 444 R
EAGAN,MJNNESOTA
1
v
80NESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
8 ASSOCIATES, INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: 5/15/86
Comm. 49355 Fig. No. 1
n
0
co
3
0
3
m
z
cil
m
co
1y
0
{w -4
c
D 0
a
c
y O
0
ro
m
n0
D y
m
-im
mz
mm
�'m
z
w
0m_'
c
"'(D
zD
N
H
o z
O
m
r
x
DAKOTA COUNTY PARK wl)ONOUGN LAKE \
LP -45
0 600
NORTH
SCALE IN FEET
WD LP -34
4 882,7
w
0
O
m m
> m
0 m r
191m
D
r
D m
m
z
D
m
0 v
O m
w
0
3 m
z
Cn
m
y
co
c')
N
chw0Dm
0 P6 -i
ER CD
O
M
0
C NO
E�0M
3>
o n 0
co
m
m'
>0-im
mm
mz
m.
S y m
Z
oCD
_'
0
»
m z .>
q C7 Z
N
v
m
HOLLAND
LAKE
LP -76
LIFT STATION 81 FORCEMAIN
V-69 it
POND LP -61
$UDBERRY LN_ `�, erg eee. 6•
Ex. OVERLAND FLOW
DAKOTA COUNTY PARK
0 600
SCALE IN FEET
12'
McDONOUGM LAKE
LP -t9
NOR TM
POND V rN
N« eez.r
HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET
ASSESSMENT AREA
PROJECT 444R
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
L
LE
BONESTROO. ROSENE. ANDERLIK
8 ASSOCIATES. INC.
Consulting Engineers
St. Paul. Minnesota
D ate: 5/15/86
Comm. 49355 Fig' No. 3
®-
RIF
y
I�
a
z
Dc
w
' I—
J
Q
I
Q =
LU
r
_ o
Q z
C z w
L ' N
w
U)
to
Q o
O -m r
BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK
f 8
HOLLAND LAKE OUTLET ASSOCIATES, INC.
ASSESSMENT AREA — ALTERNATE Consulting Engineers
St. Paul, Minnesota
PROJECT 444R
Date: 5% 15/86
EAGAN,MNNESOTA Comm. 49355 Fig• No.3 ALT.
Agenda Information Memo
-June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -One
• • s
TAX INCREMENT PROGRAM AND FINANCING PLAN/SPERRY PROJECT
A. Final Consideration and Review of the Sperry Tax Increment
Development Program and Financing Plan for Economic Development
District #1 --At the May 21, 1986, City Council meeting a public
hearing was held to consider and review the Sperry Tax Increment
Financing Plan for Economic Development District #1. The amount of
the tax increment financing is $700,000..00 which will be used for
related public improvements to the Sperry Project. The tax
increment financing is structured so that 508 of the new tax
increment will be used to pay off the $700,000.00 T.I.F. bonds,
while the remaining 508 increment that is generated by the new
project will go directly into the tax base so that all taxing
jurisdictions will realize the immediate benefit of increased taxes.
At the May 21 City Council meeting, final action on the Economic
Development District #1 planned and the development program could
not be taken due to the statutory requirement to notify both the
school district, which is Independent School District 196 and Dakota
County, to learn if they had any objections or concerns about the
proposed tax increment financing. There has been no correspondence
or communication from either jurisdictions since the letters and
documents were sent out in mid-May. Therefore action to consider
both the development program and tax increment financing plan for
Economic Development District #1 is in order for consideration.
Enclosed is a copy of the plan and program that was presented as a
part of the May 21 City Council packet.
Also enclosed is a copy of a development agreement, but the City
Administrator suggest it be drafted by both Council and the City
Attorney's Office_ This development agreement provides additional
protection to the City of Eagan and provides clarification on the
City's commitment and how funds will be disbursed as a part of the
tax increment financing program. A copy of that agreement is
Z3I.Tenclosed on pages0'/ through 4Z3_1-
There
here has been a great deal of news on the Sperry/Burroughs merger,
and if members of the City Council have any specific questions
regarding the recent acquisition of the Sperry Corporation by
Burroughs, Mr. Ed Michaud will be present at the City Council
meeting on Tuesday. There was also an article that appeared this
F/
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Two
past week in the Minneapolis paper suggesting that the semiconductor
plant may be sold. According to Mr. Michaud "to his knowledge
Sperry Corporation is not considering the sale of the semi -conductor
facility; however, due to the competition in the world of
semi -conductors, they are looking for a partner to enhance their
high technology research capabilities to remain competitive in the
industry". He also indicated that with the recent merger of
Burroughs there is even a stronger desire to maintain the
semi -conductor facility at its present location and possibly utilize
semi -conductor technology that the Burroughs Corporation can offer.
Grading has been continuing along on the site for the Sales and
Marketing facility and according to Mr. Michaud steel for the
building was ordered this past week allowing the project to continue
on schedule.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the tax
increment financing development program and plan for the Economic
Development District #1 or the Sperry Sales and Marketing facility.
•
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
Tax Increment Financing Plan
Economic Development District #1
May 6, 1986
r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION .............................................. 1
BACKGROUND ................................................ 1
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ....................................... 1
Objectives ........................................... 1
Project Description .................................. 2
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING 2
Statutory Authorization .............................. 2
® Basis for Findings ................................... 3
District Certification and Duration of Tax
Increment Financing District ....................... 3
Prior Planned Improvements ........................... 4
Original Assessed Value ............................... 4
Bonded Indebtedness .................................. 4
Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment .. 4
Estimated Sources and Uses of Funds 5
;. Uses of Tax Increment .........
Additional Financings ................................ 5
Fiscal Disparities ................................... 6
Impact on Other Taxing. Jurisdictions ................. 6
EXHIBIT
A - Development Program for Economic Development
• District No. 1 .................................. A-1
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT No. 1
CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA
INTRODUCTION
This Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") has been
prepared by the City of Eagan, Minnesota (the "City") under the
requirements of the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act (the
"Act"), Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71-273.78. The City
herein proposes and describes the establishment of a Tax Incre-
ment Financing District within the coterminous Economic Develop-
ment District No. 1, for purposes of financing public improve-
ments required to support a major private -sector development,
consisting of a proposal by Sperry Corporation to construct and
operate a 295,000 square foot office and computer center and
related facilities (the "Improvements").
BACKGROUND
The City Council has called for a public hearing on the
"3 formation of both Economic Development District No. 1 and the Tax
Increment Financing District, for May 21, 1986. On June 17, 1986,
subject to public input, the Council will consider both the
Development Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Economic
Development District No. 1 is being established as a Development
District pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A.
A copy of the proposed Development Program for Economic
Development District No. 1 and a legal description of the
District are attached as an Exhibit to this Plan and are hereby
incorporated by reference as part of this Plan.
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
Objectives
The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in
establishing Economic Development District No. 1 are as follows:
1. To promote and secure the prompt development of a
major office and technology facility contributing to the tax
base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. To reduce the cost of
manner permitting the completion
economic basis.
development of property in a
of a facility on an
•
3. To secure the construction and provide monies for
the payment of the costs of public improvements in and
adjacent to the District, which are necessary for the orderly
and complete development of the District in a manner which
will promote the attractiveness of the area and promote
public safety.
4. To promote economic development which will add to
the employment opportunities in the community, and add to
the tax base of the community by increasing taxable values
and increasing the need for commercial development.
Project Description
The actions expected to be taken by the City within the
Economic Development District No. 1 include: acquisition and in-
stallation of traffic signals, construction of new bicycle paths,
construction of new utility laterals (including water, sanitary
and storm sewers) and other project improvements consistent with
the objectives of the Development Program. Further details of
the specific public actions are included in the Development
Program of the Project, appended to this Plan. No land will be
acquired by the City in connection wi'-h the Development Program.
No contracts have been entered into at this time in connection
C"I with any such development activities.
Anticipated private developments within Economic
Development District No. 1 include the construction and operation
of a 295,000 square foot office and computer center by Sperry
Corporation, the owners of the property within the District. It
is expected that construction on this Development will commence
in the summer of 1986, and be completed at the end of 1987, and
® have a final estimated market value of approximately $15,100,000.
Further details of this project are included in the Development
Program of the Project, appended to this Plan.
TAY INCREMENT FINANCING
Statutory Authorization
Pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the City is
authorized to create the Tax Increment Financing District
coterminous with Economic Development District No. 1, to issue
the Bonds to finance public improvements within the Project for
the purpose of stimulating private development and to utilize tax
increments captured from the Tax Increment Financing District due
to new private development to meet debt service obligations on
these Bonds.
Basis for Findinas
The City has established the following facts:
a) The parcel of land within the District (as identi-
fied in Exhibit A) is owned by Sperry Corporation. With the
inducement provided by the Development Program and the offer
of a,$1 million low-interest loan by the State of Minnesota,
Sperry Corporation is expected to construct the Development.
The Development is expected to have a value of approximately
$15,100,000 and have approximately 700 employees. The Tax
Increment Financing District therefore qualifies as an
"Economic Development" district under Statutes 273.73,
Subdivision 12.
b) The Development Program for Economic Development •
District No. 1, and this Plan, have been reviewed by the
Planning Commission of the City, and found to be in
conformance with the Comprehensive Guide Plan of the City.
c) The opportunity and feasibility for development of
Economic Development District No. 1 by private parties is
maximized through the use of tax increment financing. Given
the unavailability of funding from other governmental
sources other than the $1 million low-interest loan offered
by the State of Minnesota and the necessity of the improve-
ments to be constructed as an inducement to the Development,
the use of tax increment financing will maximize the
development opportunities within Economic Development
District No. 1.
d) Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3, of the •
Act, the City elects the method of tax increment computation
as defined in clause (b), whereby the contribution ratio for
the City under the Fiscal Disparities requirements (Chapter
473F) will be applied against commercial/industrial
properties within the Tax Increment Financing District.
District Certification and Duration of Tax Increment Financing
District
The City expects to request a certification of this
District in 1986, following a scheduled public hearing on May 21,
1986, and following a thirty -day review period by Dakota County
and affected school districts.
As an Economic Development Tax Increment Financing
District, the maximum life of the District is the lesser of (i)
eight years from the date of collection of the first increment,
;`' which is expected to be July, 1988, or (ii) 10 years from the
0—
date of approval of this Tax Increment Financing Plan, which is
expected to be June 17, 1986. The City retains the option of
terminating the District upon the redemption of the Bonds.
Prior Planned Improvements
No building permits have been issued by the City for
any parcels within the Tax Increment Financing District, in the
first fifteen months of the eighteen month time period preceding
the expected date of approval of the Tax Increment Financing
District by the City.
Original Assessed Value
It is anticipated that the District will be approved on
June 17, 1986, and that certification will be requested of the
Dakota County Auditor soon thereafter. The Original Assessed
Value of the District will therefore be the value assessed in
1986 for taxes payable in 1987. The original assessed valuation
of the District has not yet been determined because the creation
of the District will require identification of a new tax parcel,
but it is expected that the original assessed value will not
exceed $2 million at any time folloc.ing the adjustments required
by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes. Pursuant to Section
273.76, Minnesota Statutes, the Original Assessed Value of the
District for each of the next 10 years will be required to be
adjusted annually by the average percentage increase in the
assessed valuation of the property included in the District
during the previous five years.
Bonded Indebtedness
• It is currently anticipated that the City will issue
the Bonds in a principal amount not to exceed $700,000. This
amount includes enough capitalized interest to meet debt service
obligations up to the point that sufficient tax increments are
estimated to be generated to meet debt service obligations.
Estimated Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment
Current financial projections for the Tax Increment
Financing District, based on assumptions that include an estimated
final market value of the Improvements of $15,100,000, an estimated
assessed valuation of the Improvements of $6,493,000, a constant
mill rate of 102.138 mills, a fiscal disparities contribution
ratio of 28.8877%, and the termination of the District in the
year 1996, suggest that the total tax increment to be generated
by the District will equal at least $400,000, of which $200,.000
will be retained by the City for payment of debt service on the
Bonds. Assuming no inflation in property values after the
g7
e
Improvement's initial assessment, it is estimated that the
District will have an annual Captured Assessed Values following
completion of the Improvement $6,493,000, less any adjustment
required by Section 273.76, Minnesota Statutes.
Estimated Uses of Funds
.It is estimated that the proceeds of the Bonds will be
expended approximately as follows:
Uses:
Capitalized interest
$ 63,555
Construction Costs for
Improvements
Traffic Signals
$ 55,000
Bike Trail
32,000
Utilities and Other
535,482
622,482
Costs,.of Issuance
Bond•Discount
7,000
6,963
$700,000
Uses of Tax Increments
Under Section 273.75, Subdivision 4, of the Act, the
City will use the tax increments generated from the Captured
Assessed Value of the District to pay the principal and interest
on the Bonds issued to finance the Improvements. Pursuant to
Section 273.75, Subdivision 2, of the Act, the City elects to
retain 100% of all increments collected, however,, to the extent
that receipts of tax increment exceed the debt service require-
ments for the bonds to be issued an amount up to 500 of the
increments are expected to be returned to the County Auditor for
distribution to affected taxing jurisdictions.
Notwithstanding the above, the City retains the option,
at any time during the life of the District, to retain some
portion less than 100% of the annual tax increment, and pass on
the remaining portion to the other taxing jurisdictions.
The City also retains the option, pursuant to Section
273.74, Subdivision 4, of modifying this Plan to include further
expenditures of tax increments for additional public purposes.
Additional Financi
The City presently anticipates no other additional
financing for the District.
•
Fiscal Disparities
Pursuant to Section 273.76, Subdivision 3 of the Act,
the City elects to utilize the method of computing Captured
Assessed Value as defined under clause (b).
Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
Because the proposed Improvements are occurring con-
tingent on the City's provision of the improvements contemplated
by the Development Program as financed by tax increments, it is
determined that this Tax Increment Financing District will have
no impact on other taxing jurisdiction during the life of the
District. The other jurisdictions will continue to receive
property taxes from the District based on the Original Assessed
® Value, as adjusted for inflation in accordance with Section
273.76, Subd. 1 of the Act. At the termination of the District,
the other taxing jurisdictions will receive the entire assessed
value of the new development as part of their tax base.
u
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
EAGAN TAX INCREMENT PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
A. STATEMENT OF INTENT
It is the intent of the City of Eagan to organize a
development district and undertake a development program within
the meaning of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A, and to designate
the project area as Development District No. 1 (the "District")
for purposes of carrying out the improvements hereinafter
described and establishing the project area as a tax increment
financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71
to 273.78, in the financing of the improvements herein described.
In particular, there has been presented to the City a plan for
the construction of certain improvements in order to induce the
construction of an office and computer center to provide
employment opportunities and enhance the tax base of the City.
B. STATEMENT OF NEED
There is a need for new development in the City to
provide employment opportunities, to increase the tax base and to improve the general economy of the state and the City. This need
can be accomplished through the attraction of commercial and
industrial development. In the case of the District, significant
development can be attracted by the Program described herein.
The action herein proposed to be taken by the City is found to
have,a public purpose in accordance with Chapter 472A, Minnesota
Statutes, and is necessary to meet those needs.
C. AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH A TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT AND TO
The City has power to establish a tax increment
financing district under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.71 to
273.78, and to undertake development programs as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 472A. The City has authority under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 472A.03 to acquire, construct, recon-
struct, improve, alter, extend, operate, maintain or promote
developments aimed at improving the physical facilities, quality
of life and quality of transportation.
D. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OBJECTIVES
The objectives sought to be accomplished by the City in
establishing its Development District No. 1 and in carrying out
the Development Program for the District are as follows:
E
1. To promote and secure,the prompt development of a
major office and computer facility contributing to the tax
base of the City and promoting employment opportunities in a
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan.
2. To reduce the cost of development of property in a
manner permitting the completion of the facility on an
economic basis.
3. To provide monies for the payment of the costs of
improvements in and adjacent to the District, which are
necessary for the orderly and complete development of the
District and which will provide public safety.
E. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITIES
® The objectives of this development district will be
accomplished through the following actions by the City:
1. Purchase and install traffic signals at the
intersection of Towerview Road and Pilot Knob Road and at
the future main entrance intersection opposite Jurdy Road on
Pilot Knob Road.
2. Construct bicycle trail improvement from Quarry
Hill Park to Pilot Knob Park through the District.
3. New installation of utilities, including water,
sanitary sewer and storm sewer.
4. Other project improvements within the Development
• District which are consistent with the objectives of the
Development Program, including fire loop, street, street
lighting and site improvements.
Sperry Corporation is expected to construct a 250,000
square foot office and computer facility in the northeast
portion of the District. This facility is expected to
employ approximately and to have a market value
upon completion of approximately $15,100,000.
F. LAND USE
All development on lands in Economic Development
District No. 1 will be subject to the following uses and
requirements.
1. Permitted Uses
Development District No. 1 is designated as Research
and Development on the adopted Comprehensive Plan, and any
IF/
A-2
permitted use in such areas as defined by the Eagan Compre-
hensive Plan will be permitted, provided the use does not
have a significant adverse effect on surrounding uses in
terms of noise, traffic generation, congestion and
appearance as determined by the City. The "Research and
Development" classification provides special standards which
promote compatibility with adjacent residential uses.
2. Additional Regulations and Controls or
Restrictions to be Imposed.
a. All new development shall conform to the
applicable State and local codes and ordinances.
G. DESIGN STANDARDS
1. Site Design
Conformance with the Eagan Zoning Ordinance set forth
in the Eagan City Code must be complied with reference to all
site preparation, construction of buildings, parking areas,
etc., landscaping and all other provisions thereof.
2. Required Documents
The Public Works Director of the City of Eagan shall be
provided with all documents that he may require including,
but not limited to site plan, grading and storm drainage
plans, utility and lighting plan and all otherhe deems
necessary to determine the conformance of the proposed
development with the design standards.
3. Comprehensive Plan
The objectives of the City of Eagan Comprehensive Guide
Plan shall be adhered to in order to control the uses of the
property, including economic viability, environmental impact,
community facilities, parks and open space and transportation.
H. LAND ACQUISITION
No properties to be acquired by the City in connection
with the Development Program.
I. RELOCATION OF.DISPLACED PERSONS
There is no relocation contemplated in Development
District No. 1.
J. MAINTENANCE OF PROJECT AREA
The City Administrator shall be responsible for the
administration of Development District No. 1 on behalf of the
City of Eagan.
K. GEOGRAPHIC MODIFICATION
In accordance with M.S.A. 273.74, Subd. 4, the geo-
graphic area of the District may be reduced but may not be
enlarged after five (5) years following the date of the
designation of the District. This District may, therefore, be
expanded until 1991. Geographic modification shall be in
accordance with M.S.A. 273.74.
® L. ATTACHMENTS
There are attached hereto for further elucidation and
description, the following maps and drawings:
D E V E L O P M E N T
A G R E E M E N T
CITY OF EAGAN and SPERRY CORPORATION
DATED:
PARTIES: The CITY OF EAGAN, Dakota County, Minnesota, called "the City", and
SPERRY CORPORATION, called "Sperry".
RECITALS: 40
1. The City has formed an economic development district pursuant to
Chapter 472A, Minnesota Statutes, and a tax increment financing district
pursuant to Sections 273.71 to 273.78, Minnesota Statutes, known as Economic
Development District No. 1, consisting of the property owned by Sperry
described in Exhibit "A" hereto (the "District").
2. The City has approved an economic Development Program for the District
under which it proposes to undertake the public improvements described therein
and in paragraph 1 hereof (the "Public Improvements").
3. In consideration of the Development Program, Sperry intends to
construct an approximately 295,000 square foot office and computer center and
related facilities in the District (the "Private Development").
4. The City intends to finance the economic Development Program with the
issuance of $700,000 Tax Increment Revenue Bonds of 1986 (the "Bonds"), which
are intended to be repaid primarily from the proceeds of tax increments from
the District.
(��3A
I
COVENANTS: In consideration of the mutual obligations of the parties hereto,
the City and Sperry hereby agree as follows:
1. Public Improvements. Subject to paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 hereof, the
City shall- acquire and construct the following Public Improvements in the
District:
a. Internal access roads
b. Internal storm drainage
®
C. Internal water distribution and fire loop system including.
hydrants and valves
a. Internal sanitary sewer collection systems
e. Semaphore traffic signals at Pilot Knob Road/Tower View Road
f. Internal bicycle/pedestrian trail
2. A Public Improvement Project. Except for the semaphore traffic
signals, and bicycle/pedestrian trail, which shall be designed, constructed
® and installed to the City's specifications, Sperry shall furnish plans and
specifications and contract documents for the Public Improvements to the City.
If such plans and specifications and contract documents are acceptable to the
City, the City shall advertise for bids and award contracts for the work in
accordance with.any applicable public bidding requirements. The work on the
Public Improvements shall commence and proceed at such times and in such
manner as shall be necessary, in the judgment of Sperry, to permit completion
of the Private Development in an expeditious manner. Sperry or any contractor
employed by Sperry shall be eligible to submit a bid for such Public
Improvements.
/vB
2
3. Supervision by Sperry. Any contract shall provide that the contractor
is subject to the direction of Sperry or its agents in the performance of the
work. In the event the work is defective or in the event of default by any
contractor, the City shall, at the reasonable request and expense of Sperry,
pursue any remedies available under the contracts for the benefit of Sperry
which costs shall be paid by Sperry. Sperry shall provide access to its
property in the District to permit construction of the Public Improvements.
The terms of such access may be part of the plans and specifications.
4. Limit of City Responsibility. Notwithstanding paragraph 2, the City
shall have no obligation to pay more than the aggregate amount for the Public
Improvements. It is understood that the tax increment bonds provided under
paragraph 5 shall cover the aggregate total of all issuance costs, bona
discount costs, capitalized interest, semaphore installation and trail
improvements which total amounts may not be determined for a substantial time
following the issuance of the bonds. Sperry hereby agrees to indemnify and
hold the City harmless for all expenditures and liabilities of the City in
connection with the Public Improvements in excess of $700-,000.00 less the
future costs for the semaphore and trail installation and all City issuance
expenses.
5. Issuance of Bonds. The City's obligation under paragraph 2 is also
subject to the ability of the City to issue $700,000 of general obligation tax
increment bonds to provide funds for the Development Program. The City shall
use its best efforts to issue such bonds prior to August 15, 1986.
6. Failure to Complete. Sperry agrees to construct the Private
Development substantially in accordance with the scale and scope of the
Private Developments as described in preliminary designs furnished to the
93�
3
•
•
City. In the event Sperry fails to complete such Private Developments by
19_, Sperry shall reimburse the City for amounts expended
by the City on the Public Improvements, related City costs and interest
expenses on the Bonds which the City does not recover from earnings on
investments and tax increment from the District.
7. Design Charges. It is understood that the cost of preparing the plans
and specifications for the public improvements including the future semaphores
and park trail improvements shall/shall not be included in the finances
proposed under this Agreement. .
8. Schedule. Projected schedule for the Public Improvements is as
follows:
City Council Approval of Plans and Advertise for bids May 21, 1986
Opening of bids June 13, 1986
Award of Contract by City Council June 17, 1986
Substantial Completion Nov. 15, 1986
Final Completion June 1, 1987
9. Termination. In the event that the Private Development is terminated
for any reason prior to or during the course of construction of the Public
Improvement project or the construction of the office and computer facility
then Sperry shall pay the City upon the request of the City for all costs
incurred by the City including the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds
and all costs involved in the design and construction of the public
improvements and administrative, engineering, legal and all other costs
incurred by the City in relation thereto.
10. Approvals. It is understood that Sperry or its designated
representatives shall mutually approve all payment requests and/or changes for
the Public Improvements intended to be installed according to this agreement.
(73,D
4
11. Hold Harmless. Except for the duties and responsibilities of the City
involved in the issuance of the tax increment revenue bonds, and the
responsibilities of the City specified under this Agreement for Public
Improvements, the City shall have no further responsibility for acquisition of
and compliance with permits required ,under paragraph 13, or the design,
construction and inspection of the Public Improvements or the Private
Development and Sperry, its successors and assigns shall hold the City, its
agents and representatives harmless from any and all claims or causes of
action which may result from the construction of the public improvements and
the private development contemplated under this agreement.
12. Completion of Project. At such time as all the Public Improvements
and the Private Development contemplated under this Agreement are completed,
the City will assign all of its right, title and interest in such
improvements to Sperry and the City shall then have no further responsibility
under this agreement.
13. Permits and Licenses. Sperry shall acquire all necessary permits,
licenses and approvals for the construction and development of the office and
computer center and related facilities contemplated under this Agreement
whether from the State of Minnesota, City of Eagan or any other applicable
public agency.
14. Waiver of Objections. Sperry hereby waives notice of any and all
hearings required and waives any and all objections and appeals pursuant to
M.S.A. 9 429.
15. Recording. The undersigned hereby agree that this Agreement may be
recorded with the Dakota County Recorder and that the parties shall execute
any and all documents necessary to implement the recording of this Agreement
including the delivery of the owners duplicate certificate of title to the
affected lands if necessary.
5
16. Successors and Assigns. The undersigned hereby agree that this
Agreement shall run with the affected land described in Exhibit "A". and bind
the heirs, successors and assigns of such land until terminated by written
agreement of the parties hereto.
17. Affected Parties. The undersigned include all the persons, firms or
corporations that hold an interest in or are involved in this Agreement and
the undersigned officials are authorized to sign this Agreement and to bind
the respective parties.
® 18. Copy of the Agreement. Each of the parties heretohas read this
Agreement and has received acopy thereof and agrees to execute any and all
documents necessary to implement the terms of this Agreement.
19. Notices. Notices required or authorized to be given hereunder, until
written notice of change of offices or addresses is given to all parties
concerned, shall begivenas follows:
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Sperry Corporation
20. Amendments. This Agreement may be amended at any time by written
agreement of the parties.
21. Remedies of the Parties.. The terms of this Agreement shall be legally
enforceable by either party in a court of competent jurisdiction andeach of
the parties retains the right to assert any legal, equitable, or
administrative right of action or defense which may be available by law in
order to implement or enforce the terms of this Agreement.
gi3F
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement,
consisting of eight (8) pages, including the following page, to be executed by
the signature of their duly authorized officers, as of the date first written
above.
CITY OF EAGAN
(Date:
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Eagan City Attorney
(Date: )
Approved as to Content:
Director of Public Works
(Date: )
Approved as to Content:
City Administrator
(Dated: )
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Hauge, Eide n Keller, P. A.
Attorneys for the City of Eagan
1200 Yankee Doodle Road
Water View Office Tower, Suite 303
Eagan, MN 55123
(612) 456-9000
7
SPERRY CORPORATION
By: / ®.
Date
Its:
By: /
Date
Its
By: /
Date
Its:
And: /
Date �•
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public
within and for said County, personally appeared BEATTA BLOMQUIST and E. J.
VanOVERBEKE to me personally known, who being each by me duly sworn, each did
say that they are respectively the Mayor and Clerk of the CITY OF EAGAN, the
municipality named in the foregoing instrument, and that the seal affixed to
said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said municipality by
authority of its City Council and said Mayor and Clerk acknowledged said
instrument to be the free act and deed of said municipality.
(SEAL)
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
as.
COUNTY OF )
On this day of , 19 , before me a Notary Public
within ana for said County personally appeared
ana to me personally known, who, being each by me
duly sworn that they are respectively the ana
of the Corporation named in the foregoing instrument,
and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the corporate seal of said
• corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said
corporation by authority of its Board of Directors and said
and acknowledged said instrument to be the free act and
deed of the corporation.
(S E A L)
93f�
SPERRY PARK
all
auu � rta.
�1� r
1
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 19'86, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Three
OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70
B The Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis
Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and
Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/
Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986 City Council meeting
authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth
off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the
City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this
license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action
continued the license to allow for a public hearing.and potential
amendmend to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm
five (5) off -sale liquor license or remove the ceiling on the
number of off -sale liquor license to be granted within the communi-
ty. If action is taken under Item A public hearing to remove
the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications this license
can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the
five (5) then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing
the off -sale liquor license maximum from four to five as acted
upon by the City Council at the May 6 meeting.
Enclosed without page number is a copy of the application and
police officer's report that were included with the May 21 packet.
e�Z
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON
THIS ITEM:
To approve or deny an
off -sale liquor- license for
Curtis O.
Johnson for location of
the Town Centre/Eagan.Shopping
Center.
e�Z
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Four
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION
CUL DE SAC RECONSIDERATION
C. Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition -Cul de ,Sac Reconsideration --
At the May 20 Council meeting, the Council considered a request
from the Opus Corporation regarding the requirement to eliminate
the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac from the proposed Eagandale
Office Park 3rd Addition. This item was continued until the
June 17 meeting to allow proper representation and background
justification for this request. Enclosed on pages �24 and
is a letter justifying this request. Enclosed on pages
and are the two configurations of the proposed final
plat„ with nd without the proposed Trapp Court cul de sac.
Enclosed on page -,� is a copy of the minutes from the December
3 Council meeting, where the original discussion took place that
resulted in the cul de sac being eliminated as a condition of
final plat approval.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the de-
veloper's request to plat a public right-of-way cul de sac, servic-
ing Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition.
I
OPUS CORPORATION
DESIGNERS 4 BUILDERS • DEVELOPERS
' 1 ii3g
June 11, 1986
Mr. Tom Colbert
Public Works Director
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
Re: Trapp Road Cul -de -Sac
Dear Mr. Colbert:
Reference is made to your letter of May 30, 1986 requesting more
background information in support of our proposed cul-de-sac off of
• Trapp Road which the Council voted to eliminate from our plat of
Eagandale Park 3rd Addition a few weeks ago.
We, at Opus, understand the Council's position on construction of new
cul -de -.sacs within the city of Eagan. However, we feel an exception to
this position should be considered in relation to this proposed
cul-de-sac which is designed to service the cluster of offices proposed
for the northwest corner of Eagandale Business Center.
The State Highway Department's requirements for additional right-of-way
from the northerly lots of the Business Center for extension of I-494
made it necessary to realign Trapp Road east of Pilot Knob and
reconfigure the lots it was originally designed to service.
In addition, when the new interchange for 35E and I-494 was constructed,
our old direct front door Highway 55 access was significantly altered.
To compensate for these highway related changes, we relocated our
® entrance for the Business Center to Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center
Drive. To enhance this new entrance into the Center for customers and
owners, we reconfigured the alignment of Corporate Center Drive, resized
and configured the old lots into new accessible parcels and created a
master development plan that would place our highest image buildings
(offices and hotel) at this new entrance to the Center. Our intent was
to create a new sense of place and identity for the new businesses
locating in the vacinity of Pilot Knob, Trapp Road and Corporate Center
Drive. The use of a common drive, exciting architecture and landscaping
helps achieve these ,objectives. That is why the "Trapp Court"
cul-de-sac was and is being proposed for the area as shown on the plat
of Eagandale 3rd Addition. We used this concept of high visibility and
convenient public access from Pilot Knob and Trapp Road to sell Sperry
on the site that they are currently developing.
It should also be pointed Out that this is the only cul-de-sac that is
being proposed for all of the undeveloped property in this northwest
section of the Business Center. Given the design and land development
objectives that we are currently fulfilling in this area of the Center,
we feel the cul-de-sac should be approved.
Please call if you have questions Z would hope that the explanation
OPUS AND AFFILIATES IN MINNEAPOLIS • CHICAGO -PHOENIX. MILWAUKEE -TAMPA - PENSACOLA
EXECUTIVE OFFICES: 800 OPUS CENTER 49900 BREN ROAD EAST 4 PO BOX 150-MINN EAPOL IS. MINNESOTA 55440 (612)936-4444
I
Mr. Tom Colbert
June 11, 1986
Page 2
given herein to justify the Trapp Court cul—de—sac is sufficient to
warrant your support at the June 17 Council Meeting.
Bees�t" Regards,
Robert A. Worthington, AICP
Executive Director — Governmental Affairs
RAW: jo
cc: Tom Davis
Tom Hedges
97
OPUS CORPORATION
/JY
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF:
EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION
41`%
f-trr_ T • r� • �
LOT
9
�J � y.ru- -: ✓. / 1
:.i
Council Minutes
December 3, 1985
YORKTON I S YORRTON II - IR FINANCING
The final resolutions for the proposed industrial revenue bond issues for
Yorkton I and Yorkton II'vere submitted and the applicant requested approval.
Mike Gresser appeared for the applicant and Tom Hedges indicated that the City
has not received a letter from bond counsel satisfying the City staff's
concerns that the bonds could become taxable due to the procedural variance
required for the application. In addition, the final documents for the bond
project had not been received for review by the City Administrator or City
Attorney. After discussion, Egan moved, Thomas seconded the motion to
approve the final resolutions for the two bona issues, each in the sum of
$600,000.00, subject however, to submission and approval by the City staff of.
the bond counsel letter described above, and approval of the final transcript
for the bond issues. All voted yes.
EAGANDAIM INDUSTRIAL PARK 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT
The application for preliminary plat approval of Eagandale Industrial Park
3rd Addition consisting of a replat of Eagandale Industrial Park Lots 2, 3,
and 4, Block 2, came to the Council. The APC recommended approval at its
November 26, 1985 meeting, subject to certain conditions. The plat would
combine four existing lots and three new lots, north of Corporate Center Drive *_
and west of Trapp Road, according to Dale Runkle. There was considerable:`
discussion concerning the cul-de-sac proposed to be converted to a private
cross easement built to City standards. Gerald Sunde of Sunde Engineering was
present and recommended that the cul-de-sac remain a public street. After
review, Smith moved, Thomas seconded the motion to approve the preliminary
plat application for Eagandale Industrial Park 3rd Addition, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The proposed public cul-de-sac shall be eliminated and a private
street be provided for access to the lots.
2. The owner and developer will be responsible for any damage to any
retaining wall and grading damages as a result of necessary maintenance of
the City's storm and sanitary sewer lines within the sanitary and storm sewer
easement along the southwesterly boundary of the property.
3. The watermain that the developer proposes to construct shall be built
in accordance .with City specifications and properly verified that the
contractor adhered to City standards.
4. This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary MWCC
connection permits.
.5. The cul-de-sac, Trapp Court, shall be constructed in accordance with
City standards for a tear drop design and 9 ton standards.
6. This development shall dedicate a 20 foot utility and drainage
easement adjacent to all publicly dedicated right-of-way.
/610
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Five
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN REGULATIONS
D. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign
Regulations --At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the
City staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for
the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections
of city collector and/or county roads. The policy was presented
at the April 1, 1986 City Council meeting for review and considera-
tion. For a copy of a memo of direction by the City Administrator
and a study completed by the Sign Inspector and Chief Building
Inspector, refer to pages /07/ through j�. Following review
and consideration of the temporary advertising signs policy,
Councilmember Ellison suggested "that one sign be permitted at
each intersection which would include several developers and
one standard with each developer potentially being able to place
a sign on more then one standard . After discussion, Smith moved,
Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the
policy with the request that staff review the proposal and prepare
and submit guidelines regarding locations, sizes, costs, color
priorities and users to the City Council for later consideration.
All voted yea." Following the motion, specific direction was
given to the City Administrator which is outlined in the attached
memo enclosed on pages /6-5, through L� to the Chief Building
Inspector. Mr. Borgschatz has responded to the April 4 memo;,
and for a copy of his findings, refer to pages /D through
® The cost projected for a steel sign seems high, however, individual
signs that are being purchased and placed by developers throughout
the community at various intersections are expensive and in some
cases might compete with the cost for one reader board. There
are many considerations, such as 1) The City monitoring the
program as outlined by our Sign Inspector, 2) to adopt by ordinance
a temporary advertising sign and then submit a request for proposal
and allow various sign companies to bid on the reader board and
manage the same for the City of Eagan. In other words, a developer
would contact the sign company directly and buy time on the reader
board at the quote presented to the City. 3) Developers will
be restricted with the information that can be placed on a reader
board, eliminating use of their logo and other marketing informa-
tion. 4) Steel signs are certainly more expensive then
signs but require much less maintenance. The City could erect
the reader board signs during winter months, therefore providing
both the management and construction/installation service.
Reader boards at strategic locations, throughout the City would
eliminate numerous temporary advertising signs. that are being
placed by developers and builders. Additional philosophy should
be considered regarding 1) the amount of regulatory control the
/D /
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 198'6, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Six
TEMP ADVERTISING SIGNS CONT'D
City desires to place on builders and developers advertising
their business within the City. 2) If additional regulatory
control is desired, whether the City or private sector should
manage the installation of the signs. Because of the investment
certain developers and builders have made in temporary advertising
signs,, any change in policy might require either a sunset or
grandfather provision, to slowly eliminate those signs that are
currently in existence while freezing any replacement of new
temporary advertising signs.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To discuss and provide addi-
tional direction as to whether the City wishes to amend its Sign
Ordinance by regulating the use of reader boards for any and
all temporary advertising signs throughout the City.
/0/R
MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986
SUBJECT: NEW POLICY FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION AND
LOCATION OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at
their regular meeting held on Tuesday, January 7, 1986, staff was
directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of
temporary advertising signs at the intersections of City collector
and/or County roads. The City Council commends your department on
the excellent work that Elmer Borgschatz and you have performed in
tightening up and carrying out regulatory provisions set for the
location of signs throughout the City. In a discussion at the
meeting, it is the desire of the City Council to develop additional
policy that will further tighten up the location of temporary
® advertising signs throughout the City.
First, the City Council would like an inventory of signs that are
located on major City collector roads such as Blackhawk and all
County roads throughout the City. This inventory or list of
existing signs would include the duration (what amount of time is
remaining of the two-year, temporary status) and the quality of
the existing sign.
Secondly, the City Council is asking that the policy for consider-
ation include several of the following points: 1) temporary
advertising signs must be placed in a specific location not to
block any sight distance or view for the motorist; 2) consider-
ation should be given to the adoption of criteria that would
establish a distance between temporary advertising signs (much the
same as general advertising) for aesthetic purposes; 3) a require-
ment would exist that all adjacent property owners must be notified
and provide consent for the placement of a temporary advertising
sign; 4) the size and type of structure for a temporary advertising
sign should again be reviewed; 5) consideration should be given to
criteria that would establish a maintenance provision allowing
City staff to require certain on-going maintenance of a temporary
advertising sign; and 6) other conditions that might be suitable
for a new temporary sign policy.
The City Council would like the inventory completed and a policy
to review by the first meeting in March. With the amount of
growth that is occurring, we anticipate the request for many more
temporary advertising signs; therefore, there is some urgency in
preparing a new policy for City Council consideration.
City Administrator
TLH/kf �6y
Agenda Information Memo
April 1, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
REVIEW CURRENT POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
B. Review of Current Policy for Temporary Advertising Signs --The
City staff was directed, at a recent City Council meeting, to
inventory all temporary advertising signs on major collector roads
throughout the city. Further action taken at the January 7, 1986,
City Council meeting directed the City staff to prepare options for
revisions to the sign ordinance and sign policy concerning advertis-
ing directional signs.
Procedure requiring acceptable maintenance conditions has been
established by the Protective Inspections Department along with an
inventory that was completed and copied to each member of the City
Council during early March. There are many regulatory alternatives
to review, however, the three (3) options listed in the Chief
Building Official's Report were as follows:
Option 1. Leave the City Code 4.20 subdivision 1C9 and allow
the City Council to grant special permits using the
criteria of City 4.20 subdivisions 2 & 3 which
establish setbacks and standards.
Option 2: Limit temporary signs to a one-year maxi -mum time
span, limited to Eagan developments only, area
limitation of 24 sq.feet, limit top edge of sign at •
9 feet above street level, limit bottom edge of sign
to 6 feet above s.ze�' level, a limit of two (2)
signs per intersection corner, and a minimum of 50
feet separation between signs.
Option 3: An immediate moratorium on all temporary advertising
signs and phase out existing signs as permits
expire.
Enclosed on page�. is a copy of the sign survey of 31 inter-
sections in EaganIf any member of the City Council has misplaced
the specific sign locations, an additional copy can be made avail-
able.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or suggest a
regulatory change for the control and issuance of temporary adver-
tising signs.
SIGN SURVEY OF THIRTY ONE INTERSECTIONS IN EAGAN
Hwy 149 -& Lone Oak Rd --
No
sign
Hwy 149 -& Yankee Doodle -
1
sign
( 3 sised, in sw corner
Dodd Rd -& Diffley -
2
"
( SW corner )
Hwy 3 -& Diffley -
1
"
( SW corner, Homeowners Produce for sale) no permit
Cliff Rd-& Hwy 3 -
1
"
( SW corner )
Cliff Rd & Dodd Rd -
2
"
( 1 in NIB, 1 in NE corner)
Cliff Rd & Lexington -
2
"
( NE corner )
Cliff Rd & Pilot Knob -
3
"
( NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Thomas Lake -
3
"
( 1 in NE , 2 in NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Safari B H -
2
"
( 1 in NE , 1 in S.E corner )
Cliff Rd & Johnny Cake -
1
"
( SE corner )
®
Cliff Rd & Galaxie -
1
"
( SE corner )
Cliff Rd & Rahn Rd -
3
"
( 3 in NE corner )
Cliff Rd & Nicols -
2
"
( 1 BP in NE corner, 1 BP in SE Corner )
Cliff Rd & Slater -
1
"
( 1 in SW corner Service station sign pending)
Cliff Rd & Cinamin Ridge -
Q
"
( no sign )
Cedar Ridge & Shale -
0
"
( no sign )
Blackhawk &0
�Y 3 -
3
It
(3 in SW corner)
Diffley & Thomas Lake -
2
It
( 1 in NW , 1 in NE corner )
Diffley & Pilot Knob -
5
"
( 2 in NW, 3 in NE corner )
Beerwood & Pilot Knob -
3
"
( 1 in NE corner , (3 2 in 5E corner Should be remov
Diffley & Lexington -
7
"
( 1 in NE corner 6 in SE corner )
Diffley & Trenton -
4
".
(l.in SE corner, on Right/a/way & 3 signs in SW cor
Wescott & Lexington -
2
"
( 2 in NW corner )
Yamkee Doodle * Lex. -
5
"
( 1 NW, 1 SW, 3 SE & 1 in NE corner )
Yankee Doodle &Pilot E,nob-
0
"
( 2 pylon signs , Hotel and Super America )
Yankee Doodle & Hwy 13 -
0
"
Four Oaks & Hwy 13 -
1
"
( I sign NE corner)
Lone Oak & Hwy 13 -
0
"
Lone Oak & Pilot Knob -
1
"
( Blackhawk Glen - No permit )
Lone Oak & Lexington -
3
"
( 2 in SE , 1 in NE corner )
Summary
1 intersection, 7 signs
2 If 5 "
1 u 4 u
s
6 3
7 " 2 If
g u 1 u
6 " 0
Total
31 intersections
1
signs
MEMO TO: CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 4, 1986
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY -OWNED/
STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action that was taken by the City Council at their
April 1, 1986, meeting, a concept was given consideration whereby
the City would construct and install uniform, temporary advertising
signs throughout approved locations within the City. These signs
would be designed to accommodate several identification signs that
would meet a specific specificationand design standard. Please
make reference to the example that was prepared by City Council -
member Ellison and is attached for your reference.
The City Council is concerned about the number of temporary
advertising signs that are located at busy intersections throughout
the community. I would like you to give consideration to this new
concept that was proposed by the City Council and determine the
feasibility of the project. Please take into consideration the
following:
1. Locations: It would be necessary to determine the loca-
tions that are suitable for installing a City -owned stan-
dardized sign.
2. Size: Please prepare a set of specifications that would
standardize the sign and each reader board/identification
sign.
3. Cost: Please estimate the cost for construction and
installation of these signs. Also determine which each
of the individual reader board/identifications would cost
to construct and, further, what. is fair in terms of
rental charges by the City.
4. Priority: Please determine a method in which the reader
board/identification signs would be rented considering
priority of space on the City sign and, further, the
duration of time that those identification signs would be
allowed.
5. Number of Signs: Please determine how many signs could
be placed on one of the overall signs and, further,
whether more than one size of sign 'should be given
consideration. Please see #2 above.
6. Locations: Currently, a development is allowed two (2)
temporary advertising signs in addition to any signs that
are allowed on the subject development parcel. It would
be necessary to determine the procedure for allowing a
location and consideration for the two additional signs a
developer might request.
7. Other Criteria: Please give consideration to any other
criteria that might be appropriate in considering this
project.
�Q�
It appears that the City Council would like to proceed with this
concept for controlling and providing a beautification to temporary
advertising signs throughout the. community. It would be necessary
to provide some type of transition such as, requiring developers
to remove their temporary advertising signs and possibly provide 'a
free or reduced rent for the first year to off -set expenses. that
they have incurred in the ,construction of their temporary adver-
tising sign.
Again,please give
further assistance
tact my office and
either through our
tants.
City Administrator
this priority consideration. If you need
due to your departmental schedule, please con -
I will provide some administrative assistance
new intern or one of my Administrative Assis-
cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers
TLH/kf
lQ
a
0
<= Pt
j4SAFAR►oAKsI
HILLTOPPERS
Omen IhDMPSDP, LOS
40
a
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM HEDGES .
CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIIAL, DALE PETERSON
FROM: ELMER A BORGSCHATZ
DATE: JUNE 12, 1986
BE: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY OWNED/STANDARDIZED
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In reference to memo dated April 4, 1986 we have gathered some information
that may be helpful to study a program which could be considered to eliminate
a problem relative to a reader board identification. I have been very much
impressed by the concept, however there may be some pitfalls as we will allude
to when we refer to the seven points set forth in your letter.
• 1. LOCATIONS - I would estimate that six reader boards are needed to cover
the present activity in the City. The developments are spread into most
areas of the City, however it may be difficult to lease six prime spots as
the use of right-of-ways would not be advisable.
2. SIZE - The attached sign detail by a reputable advertising company in
Eagan meets the recommendation of the. Council, however the all -steel sign
cost estimate also attached seems high.
3. COSTS - In accordance with estimates we have for an all steel constructed
sign with steel posts, removable (12" x 72" adv. panels) which would
include reflectorized panels would cost approximately $5,250 per unit.
The land use cost is estimated at $600 per unit. $100 maintenance cost
annually may be low.
Assuming a ten-year life expectancy of the all -steel sign, the following
® calculations indicate the projected income necessary to provide the
service:
To meet the annual costs which would be change of script:
3 @ $1,143, depreciation of $525, interest of $525, lease
Of site - $600 and $100 for maintenance for a total of
$2,893. A monthly rental fee of $33 per panel would be
necessary.
4. PRIORITY - It is suggested that the reader board be leased to the
applicants who have shown the greatest activity in number of units
processed in the preceding six months.
5. NUMBER OF SIGNS - We believe that signs should be uniform for aesthetic
values. At the moment, it would seem difficult to locate more than six
signs in strategic locations within the City. Six signs filled would
allow for 48 users and not knowing the acceptance by the industry, the
outlay of approximately $36,000 looks large.
6. LOCATION - It is our contention that location could be found for six good
spots. I believe Council and management could be a better judge of the
temporary advertising needs, hopefuLly the reader board would eliminate
part of the problem. /Q
7. OTHER CRITERIA - Space on the reader board on an annual basis, if renewals
are wanted, arrangements and fees should be made 30 days before
expiration. Vacancies do not destroy the effect of the board.
EB/js
•
----- ---1111r=aiiur--_----
FABRICATORS
DESIGNERS
�Jo
June 6, 1986
Mr. Elmer Borgschatz
City of Eagan
® 3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
•
-�,��sri�ence
h1c.
945 PIERCE BUTLER ROUTE • 488.6711 • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 551C
RE: Twin post directional signs
Dear Elmer:
To furnish and install a 161 tall twin post structure with
eight double faced directional panels as shown on Drawing
#86-R-193, our price to you is $4,737.00. For optional
reflective copy, add $512.00.
The following is a cost breakdown for your review:
Poles
Reflective
12" x 7211 D/F panels
Non -reflective
1211 x 72" DIF panels
Sincerely,
LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC.
Mike Gifford
MG:ds
Furnished
700.00
Installed Total
1300.00 2000.00
291.00 90.00 381.00
227.00 90.00 317.00
0
.TOP V IE W
o
J
1!
nflkss ftes
17,
AWN. PAVELS
AYDSQ. NBf!
0 0�0 CT002
ll lll'lLLi��l5001SC4J L�00
�
�OFUGTafBIED
Com' _ --
AYV µYD�IL
WNIiG
'
AA
DK. WmN2E'
FR6iT ViEw
4W �LLuy. ntiF� PriON D�f /
nkee��are
�Oe�te� II
r•B
1!
d
d
�
a
Agenda Information Memo
June 17,, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/MINNESOTA BANK EAGAN
A. Conditional Use Permit (Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
for a Pylon Sign --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at their May 27, 1986 meeting, to consider an application
submitted by the Minnesota Bank Eagan for a conditional use permit
to allow a pylon sign located on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial
3rd Addition. The APC is recommending approval, subject to condi-
tions set forth in the staff report. Enclosed on pages //3
through / is a copy of the Planning Department report as
• it pertains to this application. Also enclosed on page(s)//94#7
is a copy of the minutes from the APC meeting concerning this
item.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
conditional use permit to allow a pylon sign along Yankee Doodle
Road in the Bicentennial Addition.
�/L
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PYLON SIGN
APPLICANT: MN BANK EAGAN
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: NB (UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT;
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting
a Conditional Use Permit in order to allow a pylon sign located
on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition.
COMMENTS: In the initial review, the Planning Department has
determined that a Variance as well as a Conditional Use Permit
would be required in order to allow a pylon sign for Minnesota
Bank Eagan. Presently, there exists only 127' to the existing
standard pylon sign and approximately 225' to the existing Super
America sign. Therefore, any location elected for construction
of this sign on the Minnesota Bank Eagan site would be in violation
of the spacing requirement of the sign ordinance.
Minnesota Bank Eagan has come to the City because of the location
and visibility of the bank from Yankee Doodle Road. Representatives
of the bank feel a pylon sign would give much more visibility.
® They are requesting the Variance from the City in order to construct
the sign which would consist of approximately 95sq. ft. and
would have the Minnesota Bank Eagan logo plus an electronic
reader board which would display advertising plus time and tempera-
ture. The bank representatives feel that this pylon sign would
get the added' visibility they need to bring customers to this
branch bank facility.' If approved, the Conditional Use should
be subject to the following conditions:
1) Variance from the 300' spacing shall be required.
2) The sign square footage shall be 95 sq. ft. or what is attached
with the May 21 report.
3) Height shall be no more than 27' above ground level.
DCR/jj
//3
11] /�`__
NOOHSNIHE PM
.
FM
7
J Y
•aurt
�WMNI PMN
cI
i�� IQ¢
1 ®
of
ri
Fc
Q
"C r,
XVj OLfdR
OUNS oY�• 9¢
�
�., I4 i
L<uILF Q 141 ♦a/..f
0. br
C0.0,
L E
c c
'NLP.
-'pT 4' R-3
R-3
J:'�N
c Nn i 1FEss�
ryn�?Lom4O.
4 I y JNB
yB
y
OP j r 4
i nlocEl-P .�y"- - PD
JJJ NB. t.. I 30
;a ��NpFEr P bn / j LE
• I NCWXrs , I
F'xXs Reda 175.2 C JF ^� CSC I ...
Lc —JII I!
RLM 108 R i4
IF
1•ir,. % � I
l� 'I
16 (D Io .Vi
r�1R%
I� A, I P.p
•
•
I
6
6
Minneso aDD Y
Eagan
aL,,,q }Y •e v. f �•,I•� si` � ISS �
E ••• � �, � •• a �. • >.
���E• S•• • • • ••': Yir3/i �Ol ' � •Ci � y�
\\ YantM Doodle Road
ale EXISTING PYLON SIGN
PYLON SIGN PROPOSAL
Wer. M 4.r
'!Y
APC Minutes
.May 27, 1986
SIGN ORDINANCE — FEDERAL LAND COMPANY
TOWN CENTRE 70 a TOWN CENTRE 100
Chairperson McCrea opened the discussion requesting response from the
Commissioners in regard to the need to review the Sign Ordinance and proposed
amendments. City Planner Runkle introduced the information available
regarding other area communities and their sign ordinances, along with a rough
approximation of the maximum number of signs that could be allowed in the Town
Centre 70 area, assuming the platting of the property that would allow such
maximization. Discussion centered around whether a planned development could
be'used to handle variances from the sign ordinance. It was suggested that
the use of a planned development to allow variances from the sign ordinance
would open the floodgates upon the sign ordinance restrictions. It was also
argued that there are very few commercial planned developments in Eagan,
thereby minimizing the impact of using the PD Agreement as a means of
providing flexibility to the sign ordinance. The public hearing was.then
convened. Mr. Charles Bartholdi appeared on behalf of Federal Land Company
and indicated the willingness of Federal Land Company to enter into a Sign
Agreement whereby the number of signs in Town Centre 100 would be restricted
to 12 and the number of signs in Town Centre 70 to 16 signs. No one from the
general public was present in regard to this issue and the public hearing was
closed. After a lengthy discussion, Harrison moved, Voracek seconded the
motion to direct the staff to work out a Sign Agreement with Federal Land
Company whereby variances to the sign ordinance would be specified along with
the locations of the proposed signs. A legal opinion in regard to the'use of
sign agreements and/or planned developments in order to provide for variances
from the Sign Ordinance was requested. The agreement and opinion are to be
provided to the Planning Commission in time for its members to review them
prior to the meeting at which it is to be presented. All voted in favor.
MINNESOTA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT a VARIANCE
The public hearing for a variance and conditional use permit for a pylon
sign on Lot 2, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition located in part of the
northeast quarter of Section 16, Yankee Doodle Road, west of. Pilot Knob Road,
was then convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle then described the
proposal and Mr. Mike Larkin appeared on behalf of the applicant. It was
indicated that the bank now lacked visibility on Yankee Doodle Road, due to
the development around it and that it was cooperating with the Amoco station
adjacent to it in order to maximize the distance between pylon signs along
Yankee Doodle Road, if a fourth pylon sign was to be allowed.
It was then suggested that the applicant's request be considered together
with the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move the existing pylon
sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition at the southeast
quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive. Mr. Runkle .pointed out
that the Amoco Oil Company variance request was tied to two other variances
for the expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station located on Lot L,
Block 1, Bicentennial 3ra Addition, and apparently impacted the need to move
the pylon sign for that location.
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard
to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from
setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station.
Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive
status in the area. Chairperson McCrea then ,convened the public hearing in
regard to the Amoco Oil:Company request fora variance to move an existing
pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public
hearing was closed.
Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for
two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the
public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed.
Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to
Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and
® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to
address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the
distance between signs would be asJollows: The distance between the Super
America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the
distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be
275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle
Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in
regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet.
2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level.
® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant,
being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the
Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping
sign and the Amoco sign.
4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE
Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move
an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition,
in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of
Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of
Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was
pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and
the Amoco station.
3
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Eight
VARIANCE TO MOVE PYLON SIGN/AMOCO OIL
B. Variance (Amoco Oil Company) to Move an Existing Pylon Sign
Located in Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third Addition --A public
hearing was .held to consider a variance to move a pylon sign
that currently advertises the Amoco Oil station on Yankee Doodle
Road. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval
of the variance, subject to conditions set forth in the Planning
Department report. For a copy of the Planning Department report
which pertains to this agenda item and agenda item C of new busi-
ness, refer to pages through. For action that
was take by the APC, ref r to a copy of those minutes found on
• page(s) /Z j through /7_ (,, .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
variance to allow an existing pylon sign to be moved for .the
Amoco Oil Company.,
•
�� O
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE FOR BLDG. SETBACK & VARIANCE FOR 20'
GREEN AREA ALONG A PUBLIC ROAD & A VARIANCE
TO MOVE A PYLON SIGN.
APPLICANT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY, JIM RABUSE
LOCATION: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BICENTENNIAL 3RD ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: NB (.UNDER THE BICENTENNIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT;
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 22., 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
® APPLICATION: An apDl catian leas 's�sa su;-.:fitted requesting 3
Variances; 2 relating _o :yailCiag C�siSn anc 1Variance to relocate
an existing pylon sign on Lo'- 1, Block 1: Bicz!ntennial 3rd Addition.
COMMENTS: Mr. Rabuse has met with the Planning Department a number
of times to see how he could provide additional service to his
customers by remodeling his existing station to provide one-stop
convenience shopping, along with gas, in order to compe`-e with other
facilities in the general area. Mr. Rabuse has submitted a revised
site plan which shows a remodeling or building addition to the east
of which the building would go to approximately 3' at the east
property line. The most easterly extension would be remodeled for
the car wash. The location of the existing car wash would be
converted for the convenience foods and in relocating the car wash
facility, the traffic circulation would be reversed from what it
presently is. Therefore, a widening of the driveway area on the
north property line would be required to get adequate stacking and
® circulation. The traffic would then go from the north to the south
through the car wash facility and out to access on 81st St. versus
Washington Dr.
Mr. Rabuse has contacted the adjacent property owners of which a
letter is attached with their submittal stating they have no problem
with the Variance encroachment on the east.
If the Variance is approved for the building expansion, then the
applicant is requesting to move the pylon sign which is presently
located in the northeast corner of the lot further west or closer to
the intersection of Washington Dr. and Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed
is a rendering of the sign which the applicant would construct if
the Variance is approved.
The variance should be subject to the following conditions:
1) Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department
for the remodeling.
2) All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to .
3) A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20' green area.
/ZD
April 28, 1986
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Subject: Variance Request - Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial Third
Addition (Yankee Square Standard)
Dear Council Members:
• If approved, it is the purpose of this variance to allow
for the remodeling of the current existing structure to provide
for ancillary sales and interior convenience to and for the
motoring public. This request will enable Yankee Square Standard
to re -position itself to better serve the increasing needs and
wants of the customer and for the growth of the Eagan. community.
The following variance or variances are respectfully
requested:
1.) 0 -Zero Setback from the East property line to allow
for the addition of a Car Wash bay and the re-routing of
drive to allow for'ease of vehicle egress.
2.) 0 -Zero Setback from the North property line for
the re-routing of drive to allow for ease of vehicle ingress.
Respectfully,
W. J. Rabuse
Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55121
612/454-5522
�ww "e'-pluttm
April 21, 1986
Mr. N.J. Rabuse
Vice President
Y.F. Inc.
1424 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan AIN 55121
Dear Jim,
Minnesota National Bank of Eagan has no objection to a zero(0)
variance from the East property line for your building expansion
on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentenial Third Addition.
Please keep me advised as to your progress on this matter.
Yours truly,
MI`NE80TA NATIONAL BANK OF EAGAN
-17
M.E.Larkin
President
MII /lr
1-2,7-
Minnesota
2%i
Minnesota Nacional Hunk of Fagan 3900 Sihle% Memorial I liehYc:rc I:.I�d n. 1\11MUSOM 1512] (6I') -151-i'00
I
I&A
�i
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
The Advisory Planning Commission then allowed the presentation in regard
to the Amoco Oil Company pylon sign, in addition to the two variances from
setback requirements for expansion and remodeling of the existing gas station.
Mr. Rabuse was present and indicated the need to maintain his competitive
status in the area. Chairperson' McCrea then convened the public hearing in
regard to the Amoco Oil Company request for a variance to move an existing
pylon sign. There were no members of the public present and the public
hearing was closed.
Then the public hearing regarding the Yankee Square Standard's request for
two variances from setback requirements was convened. No members of the
public were present in regard to this issue. The public hearing was closed.
Chairperson McCrea then reconvened the public hearing in regard to
Minnesota National Bank of Eagan's request for conditional use permit and
® variance for pylon sign. There were no members of the public present to
address the issue. It was pointed out that with the proposed sign, the
distance between signs would be as follows: The distance between the Super
America sign and the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign would be 215 feet; the
distance between the Minnesota Bank of Eagan sign and the Amoco sign would be
275 feet; and the distance between the Amoco sign and the Yankee Doodle
Shopping Center sign would be 208 feet. There was significant discussion in
regard to the existing variances in regard to the Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan lot. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of
the conditional use permit and variance for pylon sign, subject to the
following conditions: .
1. The sign front square footage shall be 95 square feet.
2. The height shall not exceed 27 feet above ground level.
® 3. The distance between signs shall be represented by the applicant,
being 215 feet between Super America and the Bank sign; 275 feet between the
Bank sign and the Amoco sign; and 208 feet between the Yankee Doodle Shopping
sign and the Amoco sign.
4. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
Hall, Harrison, Mulrooney and Trygg voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY — VARIANCE
Having held the public hearing for variance of Amoco Oil Company to move
an existing pylon sign located on Lot 1, Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition,
in part of the northeast quarter of Section 16, in the southeast quadrant of
Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive (see Minnesota National Bank of
Eagan), discussion centered around the distance between the Minnesota Bank of
Eagan driveway and the proposed driveway from the Amoco Car Wash. It was
pointed out that a Snow Removal Agreement is necessary between the Bank and
the Amoco station.
/y5
3
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as
described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request.
Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES
Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements
for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station Located on Lot 1,
Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section
L6, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive,
Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two
variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions: •
1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the
remodeling.
2. All other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20 foot green area. .
4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter
into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent
driveways.
All voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no.
DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT •
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter
of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced
the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore
under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on
behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180
square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue.
Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an
area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council.
Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property.
All voted in favor. /
4
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Nine
/EXPANSION AND
C. Two Variances (Yankee Square Standard') from Setback Requirements
for Expansion and Remodeling of an Existing Gas Station ---A public
hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider
a variance for a building setback and a 20 foot green area along
Yankee Doodle Road for the expansion and remodeling of the Yankee
Square Standard gas station. The APC is recommending approval
of both variances as presented. For additional information on
this item, refer to the Planning Department report that was provided
as a part of the aforementioned agenda item B of New Business.
• For additional information on the action that was taken by .the
APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s)�.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
two variances from setback requirements for expansion and remodeling
of the existing Yankee Square gas station.
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as
described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request.
Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES
Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements
for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 1,
Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section
16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive,
Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two
® variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions:
1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the
remodeling.
2. Ali other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20 foot green area. ..
4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter
into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent
driveways.
Ail voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no.
® DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter
of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced
the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore
under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on
behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180
square feet per 'face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue.
Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an
area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council.
Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50.per square foot.
3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property.
All voted in favor,
4
•
Agenda Information Memo
'June 17, 1986,,City Council Meeting
Page Thirty
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN FOR DALLAS DEVELOPMENT
D. Conditional Use Permit (Dallas Development) for a Pylon
Sign for an Office/Warehouse--A public hearing was held by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held
on May 27, 1'986, to consider an application that was submitted
by the Dallas Development Company for a .conditional use permit
to allow a locational sign for their project. The APC is recom-
mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented.
For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning
Department report, a copy if enclosed on pages /3d through
/:33 . For action that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy
of their minutes found on page(s) /9�/ .
ACTION, TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi-
tional use permit to allow a pylon sign for an office/warehouse
as presented by the Dallas Development Corporation.
iZ9
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
LOCATION: DALLAS DEVELOPMENT 1ST ADDN. SEa, SEC. 18
EXISTING ZONING: LI - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Dallas
Development company requesting a Conditional Use permit to allow
a locational sign for the recently approved Dallas Development
1st Addition. This 103,000 sq. ft. office/warehouse is now
under full construction and is located west of Hwy. 13 and south
of Silver Bell Road.
COMMENTS: A Conditional Use Permit is required since the proposed
monument style sign is over 7'. The sign will have an interior
angle of 44" and both sides will be visible from Hwy. 13. The
intent was to create a sign that would "mirror" the style of
the building. This would be achieved by using similar materials
and rounded corners. The base of the sign (3.5' tall) will
be constructed of rock -faced concrete block and will contain
a planting area. The actual signage area will measure 22' at
• the base and form a half -circle. This area will be made of
6" horizontal cedar boards. The lettering will be interior
lighted and 8" tall.
The overall signage area will be approximately 180 sq.ft./side
and the height at the top of the sign will reach 12.5'. The
height is necessary since the sign is in a large parking island
and must be visable above the parked cars.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to
the following conditions:
1)
This
sign be the only
monument sign over 7' on the site.
2)
The
one-time sign
permit fee, of $2.50/sq.ft. of signage
area.
JS/jj
l�
l3l
m
ME PLAN
DATA
I" tAa W
m
ME PLAN
D
V
n1101111=I�I�I��ISI
�Yn!
SWI®Iplwy���l �I�I�SMO
awiem�nnn��unnn��®i�nn��s�nnnnam®
sw®ne_i nnnn����nnn���i�m�eo
•
SIGN PLAN
X33
APC Minutes
May 21, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
variance, subject to the four signs along Yankee Doodle Road being located as
described in the conditions for the Minnesota Bank of Eagan request.
Mulrooney, Trygg, Hall and Harrison voted in favor; Voracek, McCrea and
Wilkins voted against.
YANKEE SQUARE STANDARD - VARIANCES
Having held the public hearing (see Minnesota National Bank of Eagan)
concerning Yankee Square Standard for two variances from setback requirements
for expansion and remodeling of an existing gas station located on Lot 10
Block 1, Bicentennial 3rd Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section
16, in the southeast quadrant of Yankee Doodle Road and Washington Drive,
Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend approval of the two
variances to setback requirements, subject to the following conditions:
1. Building permits shall be approved by the Building Department for the
remodeling.
2. Ail other City Ordinances shall be adhered to.
3. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted for the area of
encroachment to the 20 foot green area. .
4. The Minnesota Bank of Eagan and Yankee Square Standard shall enter
into an Agreement regarding snow removal and storage for their adjacent
driveways.
Ali voted in favor except Wilkins who voted no.
DALLAS DEVELOPMENT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign for an office/warehouse located in the southeast quarter
of Section 18, at Silver Bell Road and Highway #13. Dale Runkle introduced
the proposal indicating that the ground sign exceeded 7 feet and therefore
under the ordinance, constituted a pylon sign. Mr. Bernie Frye was present on
behalf of the developer indicating that the two-sided sign contained 180
square feet per face. Nobody was present from the public on this issue.
Chairperson McCrea closed the hearing. City Planner Runkle indicated that an
area identification sign may exceed 125 feet at the discretion of the council.
Voracek moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit for an area identification sign, subject to the
following conditions:
1. This sign shall be the only monument sign over 7 feet on the site.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. That no additional pylon signs shall be allowed for this property.
All voted in favor. / 2
4
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -One
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EQUITY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
MOTEC TRANSMISSION
E. Conditional Use Permit (Equity Construction Company/Motet
Transmission) for a Pylon Sign --A public healing was held by
the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting
heldon May 27, 1986, to consider a conditional use permit for
a pylon sign in the Barton McGray Addition as submitted by Equity
Construction/Motet Transmission. The APC is recommending approval
of the conditional use permit for a pylon sign. For additional
information on the item, refer to the Planning Department report;
a copy is enclosed on pages through /3P . /gpe- mi�utea� p.
In reviewing this application, i -t occurred to the City Administra-
tor that a conditional use permit for a pylon sign had been
applied for at .one time by Motec Transmission. That pylon sign
was denied. Since a variance is more than likely required to
the lineal footage distance between the Mediterranean Cruise
sign and the Motec sign that is proposed for the 'T.H.13 frontage,
additional information will be forthcoming with the Administrative
packet to better explain the variance and history of the sign
that was denied for Motec Transmission.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a condi-
tional use permit for a pylon sign for Equity Construction Company/
Motec Transmission.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: MOTEC TRANSMISSION CLINICS
LOCATION: LOT 4, BLOCK 1, BARTON MCGRAY ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: GB - GENERAL BUSINESS (NE;, SEC. 19)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:. MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM, PLANNER I
® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit t"o allow a pylon sign for Motec Transmission
Clinics on Lot 4, Block 1, of the Barton McGray Addition.
COMMENTS. All seven lots in this addition have frontage along
Cedarview Drive, a service -road for Cedarvale Blvd. Lot 2 (Sherwin
Williams Paint) and the Mediterranean Cruise :Restaurant, Lot
5, have pylon signs along this service road. They are approximately
400' apart. (See exhibit.) City Code requires 300 lineal ft.
between pylon signs on the same side of the street and a maximum
height of 27=.
The proposed sign is 20' tall, two -directional, interior -lighted
and has a signage area of 60 sq. ft. The applicant will locate
this sign along the northwest property line that abutts MnDOT
(Hwy. 13) right-of-way. The widest portion of the sign must
be kept 10' within the property line. No other pylon sign is
• being proposed along Cedarview Drive.
If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1)
Sign
placement as
approved by the City Council.
2)
The
one-time sign
fee of $2.,50/sq.ft.
JS/jj
1�6
13�
Ll
•
•
N IG�x l�aYy ra.
vwIr NIgw
E
city of Bogan
Department of Planning
i
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
MOTEC TRANSMISSION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in
part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner
Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied
some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was
poincea out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent
signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards
the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following
conditions:
1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council.
2. The one—time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to
be 300 feet from any adjacent signs.
All voted in favor except Voracek who voted no.
R. K. SCHEURENBRAND — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the
request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on
approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road.
City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was
present and explained the .proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site
anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional
boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other
necessary licenses.
2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes
shall be adhered to.
3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time.
4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the
site without City Council approval.
5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor
control.
Ali voted in favor.
5
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Two
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/R. KAYE SCHEURENBRAND FOR BOARDING KENNEL
F. Conditional Use Permit/R. Kaye Scheurenbrand for a Commercial
Board Kennel --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning
Commission at the May 27, 1986, meeting to consider a conditional
use permit.. application submitted by Kaye Scheurenbrand to allow
a temporary animal grooming, and kennel facility on 5,.81 acres
west of Highway 3. The Advisory Planning Commission is recom-
mending approval of the conditional use permit as presented.
For additional information, refer to the Planning Department
report; a copy is enclosed on pages/through / 6 . For action
that was taken by the APC, refer to a copy of those minutes
found on page(s)1!�Z.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
conditional use permit for a commercial boarding kennel as applied
for by Kaye Schuerenbrand.
/,416
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICANT: KAYE SCHEURENBRAND
LOCATION: NE a, SECTION 36
EXISTING ZONING: A, AGRICULTURE
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20., 1986
REPORTED BY: JIM STURM
• APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a temporary animal grooming
and kennel facility on 5.81 acres west of Highway 3 in Section
36.
COMMENTS: The Code requires that a license to operate and maintain
a dog kennel be obtained from the City and that a Conditional
Use Permit be requiredfor kennels on 5+ Agricultural parcels.
The applicant intends to remodel an existing 3 -car garage into
a boarding kennel that contains 10 2' x 4' or 5 4' x 4' upper/lower
cages. In front of these cages are 2' x 10' exercise runs.
The application is temporary since the applicant wishes to construct
a permanent facility of approximately 4,000 sq. ft_ in the future
that may serve as the City Animal Pound. The City Animal Warden
has reviewed the submitted plan and it meets her approval.
® Several letters of recommendation have been included with the
application and 2 have been attached for your review.
Note. The applicant does not own theproperty at this time,
but has an option to buy subject to. the approval of the
Conditional Use Permit.
If approved, the Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to:
1) The applicant obtaining a City Kennel License and all other
necessary licenses.
2) A building permit be required for the remodeling and that
all Codes be adhered to.
3) The maximum number of animals not exceed 10 at one time.
4) No future building expansion or future building on the site
without City Council approval.
5) All animals be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and
odor control.
JS/jj
/�(L
0
E
22.46
TiF
-/�,
• -- • -
as
-.
Ll
2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811
June 1, 1983
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN
Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_
It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to
make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for
a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally
known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on
numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and
she has always been extremely cooperative.
Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture
and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize
any possible noise violation.
I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset
to your community as she has been to ours.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Robert A. Mood, Manager
Building and Inspection Division
cln
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
vl� my Of
000mington
2215 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD -55431-16121081-5811
June 1, 1983
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN
Attention: Bill Theibault, Director of..Plaan-iag_
It is a rare occasion for me to recommend anyone, but I would like to
make an exception for Kay's Grooming who is seeking City approval for
a kenneling facility within her existing business. I have personally
known the.lady for fifteen years and have inspected her facilies on
numerous occasions. I find her to operate a first class facility and
she has always been extremely cooperative.
Her proposed plan calls for materials that are impervious to moisture
and easy to maintain. She has arranged the interior design to minimize
any possible noise violation.
I am of the strong opinion that her proposed business would be an asset
to your community as she has been to ours.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Robert A. Mood, Manager
Building and Inspection Division
cln
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT IOWEOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
SOUTH HYLAND VETERINARY HOSPITAL
JAMES A. LIBBY. D.V.M.
BEVERLY MAINS. O.V.M. _
5600 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD
BLOOMINGTON. MINNESOTA 55437
■61-1!6•
October 1, 1984
City Council
Bloomington, Mn
I am writing on behalf of Kaye Scheurenbrand and am
pleased to recommend your approval of her proposed grooming
and boarding facility. I have known Kaye for over 14 years
and have a high regard for her ability to operate a clean,
sanitary, and professional facility. This should be a nice asset
to our community.
inz rely,
mes A. Libby D. .M.
•
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
MOTEC TRANSMISSION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was for a conditional use
permit for pylon sign on Lot 4, Block 1, Barton McGray Addition, located in
part of the northeast quarter of Section 19, Cedarview Drive. City Planner
Runkle introduced the project indicating that the proposal had been denied
some years ago prior to the construction of the new Highway #13. It was
pointed out that the sign could be constructed 300 feet from any adjacent
signs by being constructed towards the northwesterly end of the lot, towards
the middle of said lot. Wilkins moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to
recommend approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following
conditions:
® 1. Sign placement shall be approved by the City Council.
2. The one-time sign fee shall be $2.50 per square foot.
3. The applicant shall locate the sign toward the back lot line so as to
be 300 feet from any adjacent signs.
Ail voted in favor except Voracek who voted no.
R. K. SCHEURENBRAND - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the
request by R. K. Scheurenbrand for a commercial boarding kennel on
approximately 5.8 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of the
northeast quarter of Section 36, south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road.
City Planner Runkle introduced the application. Mrs. Scheurenbrand was
present and explained the proposal for a temporary boarding kennel site
anticipating the possibility of a future new construction for a professional
boarding kennel. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall obtain a City Kennel License and all other
necessary licenses.
2. A building permit shall be required for the remodeling and all Codes
shall be adhered to.
3. The maximum number of animals shall not exceed 10 at one time.
4. There shall be no future building expansion or future building on the
site without City Council approval.
5. All animals shall be kept indoors to ensure adequate noise and odor
control.
Ali voted in favor.
147
5
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Three
WAIVER OF PLAT/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE
G. Waiver of Plat (Northwestern Mutual Life/Opus Corporation)
to Split Lot 18 and Combine N% of Lots 19 & 20, Creating a New
Four -Acre Parcel Located N of Lone Oak Road and W of Service
Road, Eagandale Center Industrial Park --A public hearing was
held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular
meeting held on May 27, 1986, to consider a waiver of plat applica-
tion to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots 19 and 20, creating
a new four -acre lot in the Eagandale Industrial Park #1. The
Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval of the
application. For additional information on the item, refer
to the Planning and Engineering report which is enclosed on
pagesl�,f through /5y. For action that was taken by the APC,
refer td —those minutes found on page(;s)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
waiver of plat application as presented by the Opus Corporation/
Northwestern Mutual Life.
I f��
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT
APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION/NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE
LOCATION: LOTS 18-20, BLOCK 5, EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PK..#
SEa, SECTION 3
EXISTING ZONING: L1, LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 20, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING
® APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting
a Waiver of Plat in order to split Lot 18 and combine with Lots
19 and 20, creating a new 4 ac lot in the Eagandale Industrial
Park #1. This lot is north of Lone Oak Road and has approximately
325' of frontage on West Service Road. Champion International
will abut this site to the NE. Northwestern Warehouse and a
45' railroad easement form the rear property line. As a result
of this Waiver, Lot 17 will be increased to a more .developable
3 -acre lot.
The newly formed lot will contain a one-story brick office/warehouse
built for National Business Systems. The submitted site plan
meets Code setback, lot coverage and parking requirements.
If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to:
® 1) A $.02/ft. Parks Dedication Fee.
2) A detailed landscape plan approved by staff prior to the
issuance of the building permit.
3) All other Code requirements.
JS/jj
#q
166
Ll
0
yC vVTC
43
EAGANDALE BUSINESSB.K.
1 l•. CAMPUS OS �.
McKEE
EAGANOALE CJOFFICEG
:ENTER "p..
pO s 3 GaG�? .
FIRS?�
T plLf
R •NEW 0O LOTI BLKI
HOLLAND Y",.. -Ir
21 DIVISION OF 15
SPERRV 14 17 ,'
ovsnEw RANDS
SIEVE H - $
BUSINESS
• �P 17
cEME D moN AMERICAN 45�J5� \02
10 FRUIT & 3� R p
PRODUCE 1'r ati�02P race.w.
SH �P
OUTLOT
n..c 14 u.c •y\ :� •A� F P ns.c
aF 19
...c 15 ' 19 •l6i �b OUTLOT 6
6 ..;x 7.:.. 1B Sr .c
A
.AL .26
..� 16
$ OU®LOTS
K
.r 17
10.
SS7� " 16 sor OUTL T3 OUTLOT4
..r
5
19 6 u]¢ ... 911 .or
6 1 E.0
es uu
o .c
au K
• LEMAY UNPLATD
UNPLATTED
LAKE a]I K
APARTMENTS
BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR:
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO.
K
EAG .N1?AI_E,CE: 'TER INi!Uoc\T
/ /'/\\ UCT. 19 /
\ YS
\ lOT IB
N
RIIAL SARK '-,_//i
I. I.r..... =jw.
11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic.
il
i
"'i
11c�Mw 1��� R�rvryiet tic.
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION
WAIVER OF PLAT
Chairperson McCrea next convened the public hearing in regard to the
application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a
waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20,
creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eaganaale Center Industrial Park,
Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section '3, north of Lone Oak Road
on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously
split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to
form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded
the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the
following conditions:
®
1.
There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication
fee.
2.
A detailed landscape plan shall be approved
by staff prior to the
issuance
of the building permit.
3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with.
4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and
drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the
Engineering report.
All voted in favor.
BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING
The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning
from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast
quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway
#55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the
application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the
City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth
Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property
had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St.
Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed
plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller
appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg
moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from
PD to R-1. All voted yea.
/'�3
I
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Four
REZONING FROM PD TO R-1/BUR OAK HILLS
H. Rezoning (Bur Oak Hills) from PD to R-1 for Approximately
111 Acres --An application was submitted by the Harsted Companies
to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development from
a PD to R-1 District. This application is a result of a require-
ment by the City Council when the preliminary plat was acted
on at the April 15, 1986, meeting. The APC is recommending
approval of the rezoning. For additional information on this
item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report;
a copy is enclosed on pages through /(e45 For a copy of
the APC minutes on this item, refer to page (s) //o/P
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
rezoning from PD to R-1 for the Bur Oak Hills development.
/5�z
.CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: REZONING
APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES
LOCATION: Sz, SECTION 12
EXISTING ZONING: P.D. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 27, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 21., 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by the Harstad
Companies to rezone the South Delaware Hills Planned Development
(PD 74-5) to a R-1 (Single Family) district.
The Preliminary Plat consisting of 205 lots on 111 acres was
approved subject to this rezoning on April 15, 1986.
The developer is in the process of completing final plat require-
ments.
JS/jj
•
J6el A
--
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPLICANT: HARSTAD COMPANIES (BUR OAKS)
LOCATION:
EXISTING ZONING:
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
DATE OF REPORT
REPORTED BY:
NE;, SE4, SA, SECTION 12
PD (SOUTH DELAWARE HILLS)
JANUARY 28, 1986
JANUARY 23, 1986
PLANNING & ENGINEERING
APPLICATION SUBMITTED •
An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat
for 204 single family lots in the South Delaware Hills Planned
Development in Section 12.
ZONING & LAND USE
This 111 acre site abuts Inver Grove Heights to the east, highway
149 to the west, agricultural parcels and Bur Oaks Park to the
north with more PD land to the south. A preliminary plat for
this site was approved on September 18, 1979. All of the lots
are above the 12,000 s.f. minimum for an R-1 (single family)
classification and meet the 85' width at the setback line.
BACKGROUND/COMMENTS
There has been an issue as to whether this PD agreement is still •
valid. The City Attorney's office has verified that it is and
any deviation from the approved planned development preliminary
plat of 1979 will require another public. hearing. Therefore,
this plat will also require a rezoning to R-1 (single family).
The submitted preliminary plat shows extensive grading in areas
that were dedicated parkland in the previously approved plat.
As a result, the densly wooded hillside east of the ponding area
will be graded substantially.
The Parks and Recreation .Dept has briefly reviewed this site
and is opposed to it for, several reasons:
1) The wooded hillside east of the ponding area will be destroyed
by the proposed grading.
2) The area that includes the tennis courts has 3.1 slopes along
the western property line where typically 5.1.is needed for
practical use/maintenance.
3) The access into the park is only one.lot wide fronting Rolling
Hills Dr where the recommendations by the Parks Staff and
Consultant was for a four lot area.
- /55 -
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1985
PAGE 2
The Parks & Recreation Dept does not feel that there is suitable
reason to waiver from the previously submitted parkland dedication
requirements.
GRADING
The grading proposed by the applicant is feasible from an engineer-
ing standpoint. That is, it meets all City criteria for slopes
and grades with the exception of maintaining a 2% grade at inter-
sections. There are several intersections where this 20 grade is
exceeded. However, the applicant can revise the grading plan
to provide for the required 2% slopes for 100' at the intersections.
Because of the rugged topography, -there -are several areas on
® the applicant's grading plan showing 2:1 slopes. While these
slopes are within City Codes, they are very difficult to maintain
once permanent vegetation is established. Until that time,
these slopes are extremely susceptible to erosion. As a result,
the staff will recommend a detailed proposal from this applicant
as to how he proposes to control erosion on this site. Also,
staff recommends the applicant revise the grading plan at intersec-
tions where he does not achieve a 20 slope for 100' past the
intersection. Finally, because the applicant proposes to encroach
on Williams Brothers Pipeline easement for grading his site,
staff recommends the applicant obtain written authorization
from Williams Brothers Pipeline allowing them to perform the
necessary grading operations within Williams Brothers easement.
DRAINAGE
The proposed grading in this site will not change any of the
existing drainage patterns. This site is located within major
drainage district G as shown on Figure 1. All of this site
eventually ends up into Pond GP -1 (Burr Oak Pond).. A positive
outlet is in place for this pond which outlets to downstream
ponds that all have positive outlets to the Minnesota River
valley.
This development will be responsible for providing the necessary
ponding area for GP -1 and also for the portion of Pond GP -8,
located within this development.
This development will require the extension of trunk storm sewer
between Pond GP -8 and Pond GP -1. It also will require the extension
of trunk storm sewer from GP -1 southerly to its southern boundary.
If the applicant chooses to have this work performed under City
contract, then the City Council must authorize such a project
prior to final plat approval. If the developer chooses to install
City trunk storm sewer privately, then it will be at his own expense
because the City has no provisions to provide credits . for work
performed privately._
I5G
1
_BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 3
SANITARY SEWER
This proposed development is located within sanitary sewer subdis-
trict N -EE, as shown on Figure 2. The master plan proposes extending
a 12" sanitary sewer southerly through this development to pick
up the southerly most portion of subdistrict N -EE. However,
the U.P.S. Addition (about 40 acres in the northeast quarter
of the northeast quarter of Section 13) was diverted from sub-
district N -EE to subdistrict N -AA. Because of this, staff re-
evaluated the necessity of a 12" trunk sanitary sewer line.
Staff's findings indicate that an 8" diameter sanitary sewer
line would be adequate to provide service to subdistrict N -EE,
thereby eliminating the necessity of any- trunk sanitary sewer
within this area.
This development will be responsible for extending sanitary
sewer to their eastern boundary at appropriate locations to
provide service to the area of this subdistrict located within
Inver Grove Heights. It also will be required to extend sanitary
sewer to its south boundary at an appropriate location and also
to the parcel just easterly of the panhandle adjacent Highway
55.
WATER MAIN
This development will be responsible for extending an 8" water
main from Highway 149 through this development to loop into
the water main within Chapel Lane. It also will be responsible
to stub water lines to its easterly and southerly boundaries
where appropriate.
STREETS
Trunk Highway 149 borders the westerly portion of this development.
77th Street abuts the easterly edge of this development. Trunk
Highway 149 is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Department
of Transportation and is a rural two-lane highway. 77th Street
West is a rural roadway section under the jurisdiction. of Inver
Grove Heights.
With the exception of the two "bubbles" and the Rolling Hills
Circle cul-de-sac, staff agrees with the applicant's street
plans.
Staff recommends not approving the bubbles -for the following
reasons:
1. There is no access hardship. The applicant is merely trying
to obtain additional lots by using these bubbles.
2. The bubbles create a maintenance hardship and obstacle.
151
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 4
3. The large paved areas within
as children tend to play in
close to the through streets.
the bubbles create safety hazards
them and they are located too
4. Council has experienced problems in the past with developers
using the bubble only to obtain the necessary lot width
and requesting vacation of excess easement after the fact.
5. The bubble on lot 11 should be eliminated and accessed up
to the north for a future potential loop street through
this parcel. This will eventually connect to the Rolling
Hills Drive located within the panhandle.
Staff feels that the Rolling Hills Circle cul-de-sac should
be eliminated because the only service it provides
additional lot or two. Lis for an
ot 1, Block 5 appears to be rather
small for a corner lot anyway.
The applicant will be responsible for constructing the temporary
turn around shown in Inver Grove Heights. Also, the applicant
will be responsible for the costs of connecting 77th Street
West in Inver Grove Heights to their proposed 77th Street West.
RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS
As a condition of final plat approval, the applicant shall
dedicate 60right-of-ways for all streets with 120' diameter
cul-de-sacs. The developer shall also be responsible for dedicat-
ing the southerly half of Rolling Hills Drive not shown on the
preliminary plat.
This development shall dedicate a 30' utility easement over
® all water main, sanitary sewer and storm sewer not located within
city right-of-way. This development will also be responsible
for obtaining easements through the park property,' if required
by the Park Department, for utilities.
PERMITS
This development will be responsible for
permits: obtaining the necessary
1) MPGA sewer extension.
2) Minnesota Department of Health Water Main Extension.
3) MN Dot Access Permit.
Because this development will generate more than 50,000 gallons
per day of wastewater, the MPCA will require the preparation
of an EA4P. This EAW preparation will be the responsibility
of this developer. Staff recommends that no
be granted until the City receives all permits. final plat approval
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 5
ASSESSMENTS
In researching the City's assessment records, Staff has found
that this development is still responsible for trunk area water
main assessments, upgrading of trunk storm sewer area assessments
because of large lot credit, and trunk area storm sewer assessments
as indicated in the following summary table and as shown on
Figure 3.
(1) Includes 20o credit for streets
(2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid)
The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting
attherates in effect at that time.
CONDITIONS:
1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must
be approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be
obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their
easement.
3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure
that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8
to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions.
4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities
are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide
for future extensions for later developments.
/f��
ASSESSMENT SUMMARY
TABLE
Est'd
1986
Description
Quantity
Rate
Amount
Trunk Area Water
70 Ac
$1,190/Ac
$83,300
Main (010-54,
011-04,010-79,
010-75,010-76,013-80)
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer 165,530 (1)
0.05/S.F.
8,276
(013-80)
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer 4.2 Ac
$1,353/Ac (2)
5,683
Upgrade (011-04)
-
Total
$97,259
(1) Includes 20o credit for streets
(2) $2,178/Ac. - $825/Ac. (large lot credit already paid)
The above assessments will be due at the time of final platting
attherates in effect at that time.
CONDITIONS:
1) A revised detailed grading and erosion control plan must
be approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2) Written authorization from Williams Bros. Pipeline must be
obtained allowing encroachment into and grading within their
easement.
3) A a condition of approval, this development shall insure
that the trunk storm sewer system be extended from pond GP -8
to pond GP -1 and the southern boundary for future extensions.
4) This development shah insure that sanitary sewer facilities
are extended to their east and south boundaries to provide
for future extensions for later developments.
/f��
BUR OAKS PRELIMINARY PLAT
JANUARY 28, 1986
PAGE 6
5) This development shall insure that
through this plat from T.H. 149
within Chapel Ln. Extensions of
and south boundaries will also be
extensions.
an 8" watermain is looped
to the existing watermain
water lateral to the east
required for future service
6) The final plat shall be revised to eliminate the proposed
cul-de-sac (Rolling Hills Circle) in the SE corner, the half
cul-de-sac (Hillside Dr "bubb-le") in the SW corner & the
half cul-de-sac (Hillcrest Dr bubble") in the NE corner
shall be eliminated and replaced by a "stub" street for future
extension to the unplatted parcel south of T.H. 55. This
development shall be responsible for all costs associated
with connecting 77th St west to the existing street in Inver
Grove Heights.
7) The final plat shall provide for a permanent cul-de-sac in
160
the extreme northerly extension of Rolling Hills Dr with
•
platted right-of-way for a future westerly extension & ultimate
connection to Chapel Ln.
8)
All drainage and ponding easements required by the City of
Eagan shall be dedicated on the final plat. A minimum 30'
easement shall be dedicated for all utilities not located
within public right-of-way. All other drainage and utility
easements shall be dedicated as required by staff as a part
of the final plat.
9)
All permits required by local, County, Regional & State Agencies
shall be acquired prior to final plat approval.
10)
This development shall be responsible for all the additional
assessments required with this- proposal as determined by
the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval.
•
11)
If public improvements are to be installed under City contract,
the appropriate improvements shall be ordered for installation
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
160
HAIIGE, EIDE & F ELLER, P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
PAUL M. HAUGE
KEVIN W. EIDE
DAVID G. KELLER
LORI M. BELLIN
MICHAEL J. MAYER
Mr. Dale Runkle
Eagan City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
CEDARVALE PROFESSIONAL BUILDINGS
3906 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122
January 16, 1986
Re: South Delaware Hills Planned Development
Dear Dale:
AREA CODE 612
TELEPHONE 4544224
You have asked me to clarify the developer's rights under the South Delaware
Hills Planned Development Agreement in regard to a preliminary plat being
proposed which is different from the preliminary plat approved September 18,
1979.
A Planned Development zone is not the equivalent of other zoning
classifications with specific code criteria for land use, density, setbacks,
parks, etc., other than as provided in the Planned Development Contract with
its various exhibits. Under Eagan City Code, a Planned Development
designation is a superimposed zoning designation (Section 11.20, Subd. 8)
which requires the developer to provide specific information to allow a
planned development which will better adapt itself to the physical and
aesthetic settings of surrounding land than does existing zoning and yet be
feasible for the owner and developer economically while benefiting the
community at large to a greater degree than development of underlying zoning.
Our files indicate that the Council has determined that the Planned
Development Agreement commenced September 18, 1979, the same date as the
approval of the preliminary plat for South Delaware Hills. The Planned
Development Agreement in our filesappears to contain an exhibit in
conformance with that proposed plat. Therefore, it is our opinion that any
substantial deviation from the planned development agreement and the
preliminary plat exhibit attached thereto would require Council approval and
trigger the public hearing process with the required mailed notices to
adjacent land owners. Substantial alterations would include changes in land
use, parks and extensive grading.
DGK:ras
cc: Thomas Hedges
Very truly yours,
HAUGE, EIDE 6 KELLER, P.A.
David G. Keller
C
E
C
J
0
0
a
3 r-
i
.. 1 ✓mil
+\�\\�v`����J 1 � j�� ',ll ,4 Lc•y . I� T_!� ! 'fr(_ �l�'/ 1 11�� '�. 11 ' ; ��� �.``
i�-.�5.�?�� ' � 4i•. � � lI �y� r �`T�J[ I K I �1.' I ��'�q � � � `F 4-� a - I •� �—I
y d �• •�. ♦ n 1 i' 7//��/ �.,!� /%� . ` d �\ a, -.y1 \\\ OWIFA 177
B OAK
UR HILLS
40EYELOPQI
• v t\ a -n y 111 ��• �, '� • > .-\ r, � , IIU ''�"��: ik �I E- ,:e+ 7 •n u.,a
ti I PRELIMINARY PLAT
� •L � \\\1�1 �.` �j/ /^w[ [[-i s " .` „� e"`��n` � /,,q,.- �1 <,�,.T',s\ .(1:.-'. �.`:...:w [.•.. ti
�- \ a 11 -. I � - /� / -moi � • ,c .
,\, � D �' � I F' � •r�\ �= I \ 1i> 1 � 1,, ',1., •II y `�' a q Ij 1 :` .... ..r+':
\I``\'f. \' •, - �,,�� .1 'r/4[[;a<�'
�JJ1�/�]11111 iX1 �!�FF''\ P\ .�.• _�j r' , i; r• �J1, 1 ,/ ` ,. � 1 �-.•" 1 o.rrs r...r.�- _ r
\\/� t 1 "� �' � //" / �L -�- ' .1 � \ � .'.� lyd ,: / 1 i.. z� � �! [ i I--=1' 'I_ I1 �.�-e•.' v..��.�...... ��
\ '\ [ I �'1 '� •'R4R,[ Aon ' //) -i a ."} " �— i o
- J• '. .1 a, � , -. • C i - / � qr 1 \ � � i14,(I y e I ; I,w, j1�- � �.¢ /
• _ \� �" �\� � If CI..[ i .[ :[tay'[ ��•I `J I l ��III111 '�"C ? j<(il �`9 _�.°.r" ..�.) [G�✓ �,..
VA v
--.---__—__--
y--
�� IL`;1�7•'�"_ e--'j-'��sF r 1' 71i f I r ' 1�� ' �J 4..1 i , p`\`f� ��} -1 _� ___
C _ n
'..so
i i-�,`a•�tA.
� �� .t ^ \.•� t � r/. `u( �:�/<� \r:) i ��. i� '^f' 01r-
•
1 •
City of eagan
r PUBLIC
$
117
WORKS
DEPARTME
829.0
856,0
f �I
� r\
V 77
0
B B0. \`
880
885.5
FP -9 8912
8870
890.0
P-8 I I
77.3
166.0
I IIS
'll
................
.... ............
.......... .. ....
................
SUBJECT PARCEL
STORM SEWER
MASTER PLAN
FIG. #1
approved: standard
plate 4;.:
CFNTER�
_�X_zl
-CNE JK RCC
J
I i
-- -N-P Ir`Is I\
85
_I CE\TER IS I
18 Vr— ty
\
N-0,
I ORARY
M
fi
5
�\ N. - C C.,, l\
a� rc
a15
99
18 ..i
\'
\\ �
N - J J II
IA*** 15.,:, i N -EE
WESCOTr
c5E I i I I N -Z
GARDEN LOTS I \\I\
12 N -X 95 �\ _
l� �sN W I 13 \1 sski29„ N -
city of eagan
PUBLIC
$ I - WORKS
DEPARTF
M
` SUBJECT PARCEL
SANITARY SEWER
MASTER PLAN
AA
•
FIG. #2
approved: standard
Plate #p:
APC Minutes
May 27, 1986
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO./OPUS CORPORATION
WAIVER OF PLAT
Chairperson McCrea next convened the public, hearing in regard to the
application of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co./Opus Corporation for a
waiver of plat to split Lot 18 and combine the north half with Lots 19 and 20,
creating a new 4 acre parcel located in Eagandale Center Industrial Park,
Block 5, in part of the southeast quarter of Section 3, north of Lone Oak Road
on the West Service Road. Staff explained that Lot 20 had been previously
split and that the south portion of Lot 18 would be combined with Lot 17 to
form a new larger parcel for future development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded
the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the
following conditions:
• 1. There shall be a $.02 per foot Parks Dedication fee.
2. A detailed landscape plan shall be approved by staff prior to the
issuance of the building permit.
3. All other Code requirements shall be complied with.
4. The developer shall submit executed easement documents for utility and
drainage purposes along all interior lot lines as proposed within the
Engineering report.
All voted in favor.
BUR OAK HILLS - REZONING
The public hearing on the application of Harstad Companies for rezoning
from PD to R-1 for approximately 111 acres located in part of the southeast
quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #149 and south of Trunk Highway
#55 was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle introduced the
application, indicating that the preliminary plat had been approved by the
City Council with a compromise reached in regard to Park issues. Mr. Kenneth
Briggs appeared on behalf of Harstad Companies and indicated that the property
had been platted first because of the owner, First National Bank of St.
Paul's, desire not to lose the planned development zoning, should the proposed
plat not be accepted. Two property owners, Charlie Deimer and Don Miller
appeared and expressed that they were in favor of the development. Trygg
moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend rezoning of the parcel from
PD to R-1. All voted yea.
*
i
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 198'6., City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Five
VARIANCE/RUSCON HOMES
I. Variance (Ruscon Homes) of 2' from 10' Side Yard Setback
Requirement for Lot 6, Block 4, Park Ridge Addition --An application
was submitted by Ruscon Homes for a side yard variance of approxi-
mately 2'' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the Park Ridge Addition. For
additional information on this item refer to the Planning Depart-
ment report, copies enclosed on page //e?.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
variance as presented by Ruscon Homes.
•
14,
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: VARIANCE
APPLICANT: RUSCON HOMES
LOCATION: LOT 6, BLOCK 4, PARK RIDGE ADDN.
EXISTING ZONING: R-1, SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
®APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a
side yard variance of approximately 2' on Lot 6, Block 4, in the
Par', Ridge Addition. This is an existing house that fronts on [gest
End Trail.
The original survey and building location met all City setback
requirements and the building permit was issued on 8-23-83. In
mid-April 1986, the lot to the south was surveyed in order to locate
a fence. That is when the setbac:< error was discovered.
Apparently, the field stakes we•eshifted by one of the contractors.
The variance is requested to avoid any potential legal problems.
The distance between both homes is in excess of 21'.
If approved, this variance shall be subject to all applicable
ordinances.
0
40 4y
'q
I� ➢ I „ I��I'I
r a�5 ii ei' 0.• i)ofl
nz677uz w
(07.00 —
EXISTING
7 W
H
� I
O
VI
W
I
� � siL.T-[... � X57•-.r-C.••ty � Z
h�w�
Z -----------
rase
I� J I IiaN,•. �
<
c 0 K
TA.S. 9 TAM1
Z
1b.zo °5zo' �s' / 'e�
aa�'� i—�..—-----�
J� Cd -o, e•zz �5• � -�- _
y p:493. ct•5I IVE. �T
o— _ �. _ W inl7
�'
e
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 19186, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Six
SPECIAL PERMIT/GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT FOR MODEL HOME
J. Special Permit (Overbill Replat Grand Oaks Development)
to allow Model Home Prior to Final Plat Approval --An application
was submitted for a special permit Grand Oaks Development request-
ing a Model Home prior to final plat approval. For additional
information on this item refer to the Planning Department. report
and a letter from the developer requesting the Model Home permit
• as referenced on pages / j) through.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
special permit application as requested by Grand Oaks Development.
167
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: GRAND OAKS DEVELOPMENT
LOCATION: LOT 2, BLOCK 4, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 17, 1986
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a special permit
to allow a building permit for a model home prior to final plat
approval.
The applicant desires this special permit due to the upcoming
"Parade of Homes" and the heavy final plat workload on City staff.
Attached is a letter explaining this hardship request in greater
detail.
The proposed home is a split entry and is 54' wide. No setback
variances will be required.
If approved the special permit shall be subject to the following:
® 1) This lot not receiving any setback variances
2) This model home not be sold for home occupancy until all
public utilities are connected.
3) This model home be the only model in this addition.
/,O
-"AKE FOI NTE
v
i
•
•R
.0
i I
�
=
vva I:Yu��
6
g� 7 B�j
8'
9
g•n LL�10 ��tr
Iyi'' ff.e
:e
Sy
Ra
9b
=:•�':�Y n%!
r
.e.FJ
'° •
`
L it ze 16 I .
^
S �
_ S+.
7 • a
15 B la 6.a 13
= 6• d. Jtl' •ate-.
.8
-i
_
to -
9
a.n
u17d
3
9
5
6.'Rr
.7
R•a
R'6
_18.
Id .-
it
C -
A ac
la
l�.an
. tee.,•,.
0,4
m
e�><
:± ~-
: na as
\ a3
law
rw
ter..;
\ a 5, t bo
• Via. - 'am.:^i.;'
>n--�.
_.r. _'
_
_
i
aA
__..v w._
o,•
,,,,a -
.'.��•a.ia.O.
a
\
.o ,
%'. 3m
='^
8
n
5
— __ _
ate.•
'�'t •�+. •8
a6
b ..
C—ORGINAGE
\I
( B UTILITY
ISI
EASEMENT PER PLAT, - 5
LOT 2
U
•
.I
03
I
r�,
I (947!)
500
CCtl III
PRO/SED 0
Q o I "./ MOUSE
19.0///
N
-J
8(D
2e.O I.
e
clj
d' I o(947.
I
N
GA/0)
F.
ry
I
I
!n
26.0
(9 7 IIII
4
a) o>
IoO SQA ;t1.N;' I
—J e
12.96 .� I 0 19u .D)
3T6'4 "E` 79.30 -
R=1884.29 D
4=2°24'41" l9
I,l HAY LAKE ROAD -
June 12, 1986 .
TO: Members of the Eagan Council
RE: Lot 2, Block 4 Overhill Replat Model Permit
Due to the extremely heavy back log of final plat proposals
is
submitted for spots on your agenda, we find ourselves in a very
precarious position.
The Minneapolis and St. Paul "Parade of Homes" (the largest
builder promotion of the year) will be held September 7-22, 1986.
Over 50% of our business for the following 12 months comes from that
Parade.
We respectfully request you grant a Model permit for our "Parade of
Homes" model. This will allow us to continue business and represent
the Eagan area with quality exhibits in the 1986-87 home market. Your
cooperation and understanding in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Please feel free to call me with any questions you may have. Thank you.
® Michael A. Parish
President
re s i den/�t/,/7�, -
"\ `'
Mare Montgomery
Vice -President
1881 Sunrise Court ECocn, MM 55122 (612) 452-0747
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Seven
GENERAL LIABILITY AND WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE
K_ 1986/1987 General Liability and Workers Compensation Insurance
Renewal --The City's General Liability and Workers Compensation
.Insurance expires on June 30, 1986. As previously stated, the Home
Insurance Company who is the present carrier of the City's
insurance, is no longer issuing municipal insurance coverage.
Therefore the City's insurance agent, Mr. Bruce Medvec of Valley
View Insurance, has researched other carriers and apparently the
• League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Plan is the best possible one
of only two alternatives available to the City. The Finance
Committee, at the direction of the City Council, met at noon on May
29 to discuss the City's insurance program with the Director of
Finance and City Administrator. At that meeting, Mr. Medvec
indicated that the quotes from the League of Minnesota Cities should
be available on approximately June 13 for review and consideration
on the June 17 meeting. The City has received the self-insured
workers com ensation quotation which is enclosed on pages /7/-
through for your review. Also attached is a copy of a League
of Minnesota Cities memo that discusses the self-insured workers
compensation program that was attached to the quotation offering.
Mr. Medvec has been assured that the general liability and
additional workers information will be available Friday afternoon;
however, the quotations will take time to review, therefore, final
quotes for both the workers compensation and general liability will
be sent out with the administrative packet on Monday. Mr. Medvec
will be present at the meeting on Tuesday for review and answering
40 questions. The memo that was submitted as a part of the last City
Council packet outlining the Finance Committee's meeting is again
enclosed on pages -L7-7- through -4ZE for your reference.
In the most recent Nation's Cities Weekly dated June 2, 1986, an
article appeared on insurance and apparently legislation is being
considered under the Risk Retention Act Amendments of 1986 that
would allow local units of government to establish risk retention
groups and to purchase liability insurance on a group basis.
Enclosed on page /1'9 is a copy of this article for your review.
This article is inf—or�Tational only.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a general
liability and workers compensation program for 1986/1987 to be
effective July 1, 1986.
/%3
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
Self -Insured Workers' Compensation Quotation
Plan Administrators:
Employee Benefit Administration Co.
6950 Wayzata Blvd. Suite 401
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
Telephone (612) 544-0311
Name of City:
Policy Period: From July 1. 1986 To July 1. 1987
Estimated Annual Premium:
Street and Road Construction
®Waterworks
Electric Power Co. & Steam Heating
Sewage Plant
Firemen (Not Volunteer)
Firemen (Volunteer)
Policemen
Store Risks Retail
Clerical Office
Building Operations
Restaurants and Bars
Pa rks
Street B, Sewer Cleaning, Snow Removal
Municipal Employees
0
Code
5506
7520
7539
7580
7706
7708
7720
8017
8810
9015
9079
9102
9402
9410
1986 Estimate
Manual
Experience Modification Factor
Standard Premium
Premium Discount
Discounted Standard Premium
LMCIT Discount 5 %
Net Deposit Premium
Rate
$9.35
6.68
4.36
4.68
12.93
31.53
5.63
1.60
.24
6.34
2.89
5.60
11.78
2.53
Estimated
Payroll
228.000
134.000
Deposit
Premium
30,456 POP* 9,603
961,000 54,104
641,000
24,000
266,000
34,000
592,000
1,538
1,522
14,896
4.005
14,978
130,915.
.79
103,422.
9,432.
93,990.
4.700.
.O
The foregoing quotation is fora deposit premium based on your estimate of payroll. Your final,
actual premium will be computed after an audit of payroll subsequent to the close of your policy
year and will be subject to revisions in rate or experience modification. While you are a member
of the LMCIT Workers' Compensation Plan, you will be eligible to participate in distributions
from the Trust based upon claims experience and earnings of the Trust.
/7el
EBA 441
Employee Benef-KAdministrat;on Co.
ent
s
l`
IIII llll
11 HilU
league of minnesota cities
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST
SELF-INSURED WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The League of Minnesota Cities' workers' compensation program was
created as a means of lowering cities' workers' compensation costs. The
program is a joint self-insured program, and is offered through the
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT), a joint powers
entity. This self-insured program was designed for the League by
Employee Benefit Administration Co.
The prograin completed its sixth year of operation with over 500
participating cities, representing a standard premium volume of over
$8.0 million. The following table shows the program's past results.
Initial Discount Year -End Dividend Total Savings
1980 6p 25' 31`%
1981 15P 25% 40%
1982 18p 20% 38n
1933 18% 16% 34�a
The discount was 20% in 1984 and 10' in 1985; no dividends were returned
for these years. For 1986, the discount is 5`p.
HOW THE PROGRAM WORKS
Each city participating in the program deposits with the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust its workers' compensation deposit
premium for its policy year. This deposit premium is calculated using
standard manual rates with the applicable volume discounts and
experience modification, and discounting 5p from this figure. From
these deposits, LMCIT purchases reinsurance to protect the program from
catastrophic and abnormal claims; pays for administrative and loss
control services; and pays claims. The balance of the deposits and
reserves are invested, with the earnings accruing to the benefit of the
participants. After the close of the program year, surplus monies in
excess of appropriate reserves are returned to participants under a
formula taking into account the earnings and claims experience of the
Trust, as well as the loss records of individual participants.
ELIGIBILITY
All members of the League of Minnesota Cities are eligible to
participate. However, LMCIT may require a city with a poor loss recoru
to comply with specified safety practices as a condition of
participation.
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (612)227-5600
LJ
ADI•iINISTRATION
LIMCIT nas appointed Employee Benefit Administration Co. (E.B.A.) as
administrator of the program. E.B.A. also administers a similar pian
for the Minnesota School Boards Association and offers a fully qualified
staff in all areas of workers' compensation administration. The cost of
administration of the program is 101. of standard premium.
Services provided by the administrator include:
1. Determination of premium for participants.
2. On-site safety inspections and development of loss control program.
3. Claims processing, investigation and payment.
4. Legal counsel for disputed claims up to the Appeals Court trial.
5. Loss reports to individual participants and to LICIT.
6. Preparation of reports required by state autnorities.
REINSURANCE
To protect LMCIT from the adverse effects of catastrop!ric and abnormal
claims, LMCIT purchases reinsurance from two sources. The state 'Workers'
Compensation Reinsurance Association provides individual excess
coverage. This covers workers' compensation claims arising out of any
single occurrence which exceed $360,000. LMCIT also purchases aggregate
excess coverage to protect against the possibility that the total claims
will exceed the funds available.
ADVANTAGES OF THE PROGRAM
1. Lower operating costs. Conventional insurance carriers typically
allow between 30% and 40% of the premium dollar for administrative
costs. Tne total cost to LMCIT for administration, reinsurance, and
commissions is well under 20%.
® 2. Investment Income. Earnings on investments accrue to the benefit of
participants. Due to the long-term nature of certain workers'
compensation claims, substantial reserves are built up in the program.
These reserves, along with premium deposits, are invested; the
investment income further„_reduces the program costs.
3. Loss Control. A specialized approach to loss control provides
practical assistance in reducing losses.
4. [ion -profit. Since the LMCIT program is non-profit, all excess funds
are available for distribution to participants.
PARTICIPATIOL
This program is offered to cities through independent agents. For
further infomation, contact:
Employee Benefit Administration Co. League of Minnesota Cities
6950Wayzata Blvd., Suite 430 or 153 University Ave. E.
Minneapolis, M!'7 55426 St. Paul, fain. 55101
Phone: (612) 544-0311 Phone: (612) 227-5600
f 76
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 2, 1986
SUBJECT: FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING FOR PURPOSE OF REVIEWING
CITY INSURANCE PROGRAM
A meeting of the Finance Committee was held at noon on May 29,
1986, at the Eagan Municipal Center Building. Present were its
Chairperson, City Councilmember Smith, City Councilmember Egan,
Director of Finance VanOverbeke, Administrative Intern Johannes
and the City Administrator. Also present was Bruce Medvec, the
City's insurance agent.
Mr. Medvec informed the Committee that Eagan has enjoyed to date
the equivalent of a full insurance coverage package for general
liability and worker's compensation. He reminded the Finance
Committee that the City has $1,000,000 of basic liability insurance
and a $2,000,000 umbrella providing a total coverage of $3,000,000.
Fortunately, the cost for a total coverage of $3,000,000 has been
extremely reasonable to the City in comparison to projection for
an equivalent package in the future. Bruce .spoke to the new
market that has developed in recent months stating that afford-
ability and availability are significant problems for municipal
insurance renewals. It is the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the
City not continue with an umbrella coverage due to the high
premium cost. For the City to be insured greater than the
$600,000 statutory amount, the cost for a premium would be in the
range of $80,000-$10'0,000 for $1,000,000 of additional umbrella
coverage. This past year, $2,000,000 of umbrella coverage cost
the City approximately $40,000.
It was also the suggestion of Mr. Medvec that the City raise its
deductibles under the general liability portion of the insurance
package in an effort to target a savings of approximately $20,000.
It was the opinion of Bruce and the Finance Committee that the
City should budget any savings it might realize by raising the
deductibles therefore creating a special fund for the smaller
claims. Because of self-insuring and cities assuming more risk,
it is Bruce's opinion that our City may not experience any premium
increase over the 1985-1986 amounts. Mr. Medvec has submitted a
specification to the League of Minnesota Cities and is hopeful
that a quote will be returned prior to June 13 for review and
consideration at the June 17 meeting. The LMC insurance package
is about the only coverage available to municipalities at this
time. There is another insurance company that provides municipal
insurance; however, it is provided on an actual claim basis as
opposed to an occurence basis --the latter being more consistent
with Eagan's past practice.
The Finance Committee also discussed the necessity for increasing
the City of Eagan's awareness and activity in a more formalized
17,
risk management program. Mr. Medvec indicated that as the City's
insurance agent, a part of his service is to provide risk manage-
ment analysis for all departments. There were a number of topics
discussed such as:
* Coverage of Firefighters
* Safety Belt Law
* Safety Committee
* Police SWAT Team
* Engineering Design
* Employee Awareness
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 1:00
is the intention of the Finance Committee to meet
as a committee or by a teleconference call prior
is
17 City Council meeting for the purpose of examining
that is submitted by the League of Minnesota Cities.
and information will be provided as a part of the
packet with the June 17 agenda information.
Cit Administrator
TLH/kf
•
/70
p.m. and it
again either
to the June
the quotation
More detail
City Council
Nation's Cities Weekly June 2, 1986
i
request to cities as, well at approximately
the end of June. --
z .There has been some discussion in the
Senate of a proposal to include within the
1987 budget instructions ,or reconc lia-
tion legislation a provision requiring the
mandatory participation of all state and
local employees in the Medicare system.
Preliminary estimates of requiring all
state and local employees to participate
in Medicare indicate a total fiscal impact
to state and local governments of $8.3
billion over three years under such a
plan.
NLC strongly opposes any such pro-
posal.
LIABILITY INSURANCE
5.2129, the Risk Retention Act
Amendments of 1986 remains mired as
efforts continue to proceed to the Senate
floor for full Senate consideration. Spon-
sored by Sen. Bob Kasten (R-Wisc.), this
legislation, strongly supported by NLC, _
would facilitate the ability of state and
local units of government to establish
risk retention groups and to purchase
liability insurance on a group basis.
NLC recently sent a letter to 19 of the
top insurance executives in the country
urging them to work more closely with
NLC in expediting Senate consideration
of this legislation. Industry opposition to
the legislation has intensified as a num-
ber of amendments have been offered
Which would significantly impair the
ability of groups to form and operate
under the Act. _
House risk retention bills—
H.R.4301—Rep. Ron Wyden (D -Ore.);
H.R. 4442—Rep. Norman Lent (R-N.Y.);
and H.R. 4506—Rep. John LaFalce (D-
N.Y.) are bottled up in the House Energy
and Commerce Subcommittee on Com-
merce, Transportation, and Tourism un-
der Chairman James Florio (D-N.J.). Ef-
forts continue to expedite subcommittee,
full committee, and full House consider-
ation.
Insurance reform legislation offered by
Rep. John LaFalce (D-N.Y.) awaits com-
mittee consideration. Sen. Paul Simon
(D -Ill.) is expected to offer similar Senate
legislation in the near future. ❑
This report was compiled by NLC's Office
of Federal Relations under the direction of
its director, Frank Shafroth, and assisted by
,staff, members Carol Kocheisen, Reggie
Todd, Cynthia Pols, Victor A. Rojas and
Leslie A. Wollack. ,
•
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Eight
KEEPING OF HORSES/FRED DELOSH
A. Review and Consideration Regarding the Keeping of Horses
on Approximately 14 Acres of R-1 Property Owned by Fred DeLosh--Mr.
Fred DeLosh has resided at 2'8'82 Sibley Highway since 1946.,
For a number of years he was allowed to keep and board horses
on his property. His property was zoned agricultural; however,
in recent years was rezoned from A-1 to R-1 by the City. Since
Mr. DeLosh has not boarded horses in recent years, the property
is :now zoned R-1, he is questioning whether he can have some
type of permit that would allow him to market and sell the property
with the usable stable and approval to board horses on his 14
acres. Enclosed on pages jf/ through /S13 is a copy of a
letter from Mr. DeLosh and aerial photo that shows the outline
of his property.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide some direction
to the City staff and Mr. DeLosh concerning his request.
2882 Sibley Hwy.
Eagan Mn. 55121
May 27, 1986
Mr. Dale Runkle �—
City Planner
Eagan, Mn.
Dear Mr. Runkle,
Our family has owned and resided on our 14 acres off
Hwy. 13 in north Eagan since 1946. The acreage was zoned agri-
cultural but, in one of our occupational absences out of state,
was rezoned R=1 without our knowledge. We have never attempted
to return it to agricultural status.
• We had horses for many years and built a stable to house
them. This stable has been kept in good shape and is very use-
able.
The purpose of this letter is to ascertain that horses
can again be kept on *he property even though it is zoned R-1
at present. This determination is especially important to our
children, as heirs, and to us in the event that we sell said
property,
Here are some pertinent bits of information -- The stable
is located out of sight in the bottom of a deep ravine. The
ravine is heavily wooded and has a small spring fed creek flowing
through it.
® The adjoining area Is sparsely settled with Highview Park
on the east boundary of the property. I believe that approximately
two thirds of affected adjoining property owners resided there
when we kept horses.
I am enclosing an aerial photo of the area and a topographic
map to assist you and the council in its deliberations. Please
return them to me._
A prompt decision would be deeply appreciated.
Very t my yours,
Fred De Losh
/q/
PA
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Thirty -Nine
RESOLUTION/AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE
B. Consideration of Resolution Approved by Airport Noise Committee -
At a recent meeting of the Airport Noise Committee a resolution
was adopted opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at Minneapolis. -
St. Paul International Airport. The Commission is recommending
that the City Council approve the resolution referenced on pages
_/f5 through /QZ:. .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
resolution opposing the extension of Runway 4/22 at the Minneapolis -
St. Paul International Airport.
r,
CITY OF EAGAN _
RESOLUTION OPPOSING THE EXTENSION,
OF RUNWAY 4/22 AT MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL
INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is
proposing the extension of Runway 4/22at the Minneapolis -:St.
Paul International Airport for the purpose of increasing the
capacity of the preferential runway system configurations, and
WHEREAS, the MAC has proposed as an integral ,part of such
an extension a southerly turn procedure for a significant
proportion of the air traffic departing Runway 22, and
WHEREAS, the MAC has asserted but has not conclusively
proven the benefit of such southerly-tu-rn-to-thezesidents of
Bloomington and Richfield most affected by the runway extension,
and
WHEREAS, the headings suggested by the MAC for such a.
procedure would approach 170 degrees, and
WHEREAS, aircraft using such headings and diverting from
them will tend to overfly large portions of the City of Eagan at
altitudes well below and at frequencies well above those
currently experienced by the community, and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has aggressively planned for
noise compatible land uses where it has anticipated the presence
of aircraft overflights, and
WHEREAS, such land uses are not existent or planned in the
areas to be most severely impacted by the addition of a.southerly
heading.procedure from Runway 22, and
WHEREAS, the Eagan -Mendota Heights boundary currently
absorbs about one-half of all arrivals and departures at MSP and
the addition of more low -altitude overflights will add further to
this disproportionate impact and place an undue burden on the
area, and
WHEREAS, the extension of Runway 4/22 has the potential to
increase the operational• capacity of Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport by allowing departures to the southwest
without minimizing the capacity for departures over south
Minneapolis,
'NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Eagan
opposes the Runway 4/22 extension as currently proposed including
the southerly turn procedure and that the MAC not proceed with
plans for its implementation, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan insist that
the MAC, in carrying out its noise abatement strategy to
concentrate the most noise on the fewest people, acknowledge that
such noise is an adverse environmental impact resulting from the
conduct of airport business and that the MAC adopt a policy of
conducting Environmental Assessments and Environmental Impact
Statements for procedural changes as well as capital improvements
so that objective standards of proof and public process may
supplant presumptions of costs and benefits in MAC decisions
affecting airport neighbors, and—....
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City of Eagan requests that the
MAC, through its EIS process, study fully the projected impacts
of the Runway 4/22 extension and the southerly turn -procedure as
separate and unique changes with separate and unique impacts such
that their costs and benefits not be comingled or misunderstood
and that the MAC recognize as invalid for comparison those data
compiled during the two year test of the Burnsville Turn since
such information was gathered using take -off points and flight
tracks unique from those currently proposed.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
BY:
Its Mayor
ATTEST:
Its Clerk
Motion by:
Seconded by: r
Those in Favor:
Those Opposed:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was
duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan,
Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled
on this day of , 1986.
E -.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
City of Eagan
/ �4 2
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
Item 1. Contract 86-13, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Wescott
Road) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal bids were received
for the upgrading. of Wescott Roadf om Lexington Avenue to one-half
mile east. Enclosed on page/? is a tabulation of the bids
received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the Engi-
neer's Estimate contained in the feasibility report presented
at the public hearing held on March 19, 1986. All bids will
be checked for accuracy with a formal bid award recommendation
being provided by the Public Works Director at the Council meeting
on June 17.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-13 (Wescott Road') and award the contract to the
lowest., responsible bidder.
/d ,
Our File No. 49381
WESCOTT ROAD
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS
M.S.A_.P. NO. 195-106-04
CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-13
CITY PROJECT NO. 467
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T.
BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986
NO
CONTRACTORS
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Northdale Construction
$456,053.50
2. Ceca Utilities
460,429.70
3. Lake Area Utility
472,406.33
®
4. GL Contracting
516,209.20
Engineer's Estimate ----------------
$427,000.00
Feasibility Report Est.
492„330.00
% Over Engineer's Estimate
+6.8%
o Under Feasibility Report Estimate
-7.4%
NO
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 19&6, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -One
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued)
Item 2. Contract 86-16, Receive Bids Award Contract (Eagandale
Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13,
formal bids were received for the installation of streets and
utilities to service the proposed Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addi-
tion. Enclosed on pageJCd is a tabulation of the bids received
showing the relationship of the low bid the Engineer's Estimate
contained in the feasibility report presented at the public
hearing held on May 20, 1986. All bids will be checkedfor
accuracy with the formal bid award recommendation being provided
by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 Council meeting.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 86-16 (Eagandale Lemay Lake 2nd Addition) and award
the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
•
•
Our File No. 49390
CITY CONTRACT NO. 86-16
EAGAANDALE LEMAY LAKE 2ND ADDITION
UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS,
PROJECT NO. 474
FOR
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CONTRACTORS
1. 0.& P Contracting
2. Lake Area Utility
3. Northdale Construction
4. Nodland Associates
5. G.L. Contracting
6. L & G Rehbein
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE -----------------
Feasibility Report Estimate
% Over Engineer's Estimate
8 Under Feasibility Report Estimate
/90
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C_D.S.T.
BID DATE: FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 1986
TOTAL BASE BID
$215,684.85
219,307.30
222,458.50
232,498.00
237,273.76
243,439.50
$210,000.00
233,900.00
+2.7%
-7.8%
Agenda InformationMemo,
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -Two
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (.continued)
Item 3. Contract 86-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract ('Sperry
Consolidation Facility) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday, June 13, formal
bids were received for the installation of internal access roads
and utilities to service the proposed Sperry consolidation facility
to be financed by tax increment funds. Enclosed on page /q7/ is a
tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the
low bidder to the Engineer's Estimate. Due to the fact that this
is financed through tax increment funds, there was no formal
feasibility report estimate prepared. All bids will be checked
for accuracy and a recommendation for formal contract award will
® be provided by the Director of Public Works at the June 17 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract '86-17 (Sperry Consolidation Facility) and award the con-
tract to the lowest responsible bidder.
A
/V
CITY OF EAGAN
Bid Opening
PROJECT: Sperry Consolidation Facility
Utility and Street Improvements
City Contract No. 86-17
BID DATE: Friday, June 13, 1986'
BID TIME: 11:00 A.M. C.S.T.
Name of Bidder Total Base Bid
is 1. Northdale Construction $448,234.05
2. Ceca Utilities 450,195.00
3. G.L. Contracting 508,788.90
4. J. P. Norex, Inc. 530,111.99
5. Nodland Construction 552,046.50
Engineer's Estimate---------------- $471,534.75
% Under Engineer's_Estimate -5 %
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -Three
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS (continued)
Item 4. Contract 86-18, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for
Bids (Daniel Drive) --Contract 86-18 provides for the upgrading
of Daniel Drive with streets and utilities under Project 475
as necessary to service the proposed Northview Meadows 2nd Addi-
tion. This project was approved at a public hearing held on
June 17.
This contract also incorporates the trunk watermain installation
interconnecting the City's high and intermediate pressure zones
through the proposed Rahncliff 1st Addition under Project 468.
Because there are no assessments associated with this trunk
water installation, there was no formal public hearing. However,
®
the feasibility report was presented to the Council for their
review and approval at the May 21 Council meeting.
•
All easements necessary for the installation of these proposed
improvements will be dedicated with the respective subdivisions
which are anticipated to be completed prior to formal contract
award.
Our consulting engineer and Director of Public Works will be
available to discuss the details associated with these proposed
improvements at the June 17 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for
Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and order advertisement for a
bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on June 27, 1986.
/93
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Forty -Four
5 YEAR COUNTY HIGHWAY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
D. Five Year County Highway Capital Improvement Projects --Very
shortly, Dakota County will be reviewing and updating their Five -
Year CIP for highway improvements. They have requested each
community to review their ,previously approved Five -Year CIP to
reaffirm the proposed schedule and to identify any additional
projected county improvements that may be required that have
not been previously identified or included. Enclosed on pages
iqs through -96 is the county Five -Year CIP, identifying
both the existing scheduled improvements (Part A) and additional
needs anticipated by proposed future development and population
growth.. With the county wanting to establish a firm program
of future county road improvements for proper advance planning,
they want to be assured that the City agrees with the schedule
and is willing to commit its resources to make these joint projects
a reality.
At the May 21 Council meeting,, the Council directed staff to
evaluate potential future signalization needs th-roughout the
city. Enclosed on page '`'`F is a map of the city showing existing
signals and future signals. All of the future signals have been
identified on the county Five -Year CIP program previously discussed.
Several of these signals will be installed as a part of the related
county road improvement and others would be by separate contract
installation.
The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further
detail any questions regarding any of the information presented
under this item at the June 17 meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
request for county road improvements.
i9�z
Prepare a Five -Year CIP
•
®
DAKOTA COUNTY
HIGHWAY
5 YEAR C.I.P.
A. SCHEDULED
EST. CITY
YEAR
CO. RD.
NAME
LOCATION
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
COST
1986•
26
Lone Oak Road
at Lexington Avenue
Signal
25,000
1986
28
Yankee Doodle
T.H. 13 to Federal Dr.
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
900,000
1986
28
Yankee Doodle
I -35E to Lexington
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
762,000
1986
32
Cliff Road
T.H. 3 to Inver Grove
2 Lane
Grading & Base
28,000
--=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heights
1987
31
Pilot Knob
I -35E to Rebecca Lane
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
1,650,000
1987
32
Cliff Road
Pilot Knob to Johnny
4 Lane
Reconstruction
& Signals
650,000
Cake
1987
32
Cliff Road
T.H. 3 to Inver Grove
2 Lane
Paving
11,000
Heights
v` 1987
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32
Cliff Road
at Rahn Road
Signal
75,000
1988
26
Lone Oak
at Eagandale Blvd
Signal
75,000
1988
32
Cliff Road
at Blackhawk/Galaxie
Signal
40,000
1988
43
Lexington Ave.
Yankee Doodle to Diffley
4 Lane
Reconstruction
840,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1989
26
Lone Oak
Lexington to T.H. 55
4 Lane
Reconstruction
525,000
1989
30
Diffley
Pilot Knob to I -35E.
4 Lane
Reconstruction
575,000
1989
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
30
Diffley
at Blackhawk
Signal
40,000
1990
31
Pilot Knob
Rebecca to Apple Valley
4 Lane
Reconstruction
450,000
5 YEAR
SUBTOTAL
$6,646,000
*Delay
Proposed by
County to Later Year
B. ADDITIONAL NEEDS
EST.
EST. CITY
YEAR
CO. RD.
NAME
LOCATION
TYPE OF IMPROVEMENT
COST
1987
28
Yankee Doodle
at Denmark
Signal
40,000
1987
31
Pilot Knob
at Duckwood
Signal
50,000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1988
28
Yankee Doodle
Lexington to T.H. 149
4 Lane Reconstruction
850,000
1988
31
Pilot Knob
at Corporate Center Dr.
Signal
60,000
1988
31
Pilot Knob
at I-494 Ramps
Signal
10,000
1988------
31------
Pilot
at Towerview Rd.
Signal
50,000
�bl�l
-Knob ---
1989
31
Pilot Knob
at Deerwood
Signal
45,000
1991
30
Diffley
at Lexington Avenue
Signal
50,000
1991
30
Diffley
at Daniel Drive
Signal
50,000
1991
30
Diffley
Lexington to T.H. 3
4 Lane Reconstruction
1,300,000
5 YEAR SUBTOTAL
$2,505,000
GRAND TOTAL 5 YEAR NEEDS $9,151,000
0
77IAsv&ng
A
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 13, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION
At our Management By Objectives session held this past winter,
there was a brief discussion regarding future reorganization
within the Fire Department that would provide for full-time
administration. With the recent announcement by Bob Childers
that he is retiring, effective July 6, as the volunteer Fire
Chief, it is timely that an organizational review and budget
.analysis be provided for consideration later this summer when
the 1987 budget is developed. A memo was prepared, a copy is
enclosed on pages ?0/ through 70Y ,that formally notifies
the Fire Department that organizational changes to the Fire
Administration will be given consideration this summer, during
the development of the 1987 budget.
VARIANCE APPLICATIONS
Recently there has been discussion at City Council meetings concern-
ing the number of variances that are processed for building
construction within the community. Approximately every other
meeting the City Council receives one or two variance requests
and there has been a growing philosophy that variances be dis-
couraged, if at all possible, by the City staff. City staff
has typically and will continue to discourage variances and even
work closer with builders and developers to emphasize that variances
are 'for hardships and there is a .reason why a plat is approved
with certain lot sizes and dimensions. I asked Administrative
Assistant Hohenstein to research the number of variances for
residential permits that have been issued over the last 4-5 years
and determine what that relationship is to the number of permits
issued. Because Eagan is one of the leading communities in the
state in terms of building construction and activity there will
obviously be more variances. Enclosed on page 203 is a copy
of a memo that provides a table illustrating the number of variances
and the relationship to residential permits and some additional
comments about the staff's review of variances. The City
Administrator has sent a letter to all developers and builders
discourag-in,q the use of variances, which is also attached on
page/ 20
PARK BENCHES
You will notice that two (2) park benches have been installed
in front of the Municipal Building. Approximately thirty-five
of these benches are being placed throughout various parks within
our community. Our Park Maintenance Division is pouring the
concrete and constructing the park benches.
/W
AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE
At the May _21 City Council meeting, Mayor Blomquist informed
the City Council that a meeting had been held with the admini-
strative staff from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
and Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant. The purpose of the meeting
was to create an informational network to review odor problems
that are emitted from the Seneca (Plant and further to review
with the MWCC a program to minimize those odors and improve air
quality over the 'western part of our,community. As Mayor Blomquist
indicated at that City Council meeting, if you have names of
persons who are residing in the west side of Eagan who might
be interested in serving on this informal air quality task force
please let this office know and they will be, invited to committee
meetings. Attached is a copy of a press release that was prepared
by the MWCC regarding the Air Quality Task Forced .The first
meeting was held at 4:30 p.m. yesterday and several concerned
citizens who were made aware of this meeting did attend. The
next meeting is scheduled for 7:00 'p.m., July 17, at which time
a tour of the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant will be conducted
for those residents attending the Ai'r Quality Task Force meeting.
Members of the Council are certainly welcome to attend and will
be kept advised of any and all meetings. Attached on page 4p
is a copy.of a list of names of those persons who were in attendance
at the Task Force meeting.
NATURAL GAS FIRE DEMONSTRATION
Enclosed on page M 1 is correspondence from People's Natural
Gas regarding a Nat ral Gas fire demonstration that will be
sponsored by their company on June 24.. The Eagan Fire Department
will be participating.
MAY REPORT FOR PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS
Enclosed on pages W ff through Q/O is a copy of the May report
for Protective Inspections.
CORRESPONENCE/MRS. DON SANDBERG
Enclosed on pages 2// through y/7i is correspondence from Mrs.
Don Sandberg regarding an interest in selling their property
to the City for passive/active parkland. The letterwill be
sent to the Parks and Recreation Director for Commission review:
CORRESPONDENCE/ROBERT FERGUSON
Enclosed is a letter to Mayor Blomquist from Bob Ferguson, Principal
of Northview Elementary Schoold, ;commending the Eagan Police
Department and Officer Larry Billmeyer for the bicycle safety
program.
CORRESPONDENCE/APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Enclosed is a copy of a letter to Fire Chief Childers and copied
to the City Council from the City of Apple Valley, thanking the
Fire Department for a recent mutual aid call. P. Z/f,,
SOLID WASTE RESOURCE RECOVERY PLANTS
Enclosed on pages Al,`5, through z/ is a copy of a press release
from the Metropolitan Council regarding an update on the solid
waste resource recovery plants that are currently being planned
by Twin City area counties. Action that was taken by Dakota
county for their waste energy plant is discussed in this article._
BLUE BELL ICE CREAM OPERATION
Enclosed is a letter from ,a representative of Blue Bell Ice
Cream Inc., asking for reconsideration by the City Council to
allow the ice cream men/women to sell ice cream from a truck
throughout neighborhoods in the City of Eagan during summer months.
If the City Council is interested in changing the ordinance,
copies of the correspondence that was rovided by Blue Bell can
be made available for your. review. A, i d 4Lzi
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
40
M
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT IiOHENSTEIN
DATE: JUNE 10, 1986
SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION CONCERNING VARIANCE APPLICATIONS
Pursuant to your request, I have compiled data for the last
five -and -one-half years which consider variance requests as a
function of the residential permits which might give rise to them.
As you can see by the table which is shown below, variance
requests have remained a relatively stable three to four percent
of the R-1, R-2 and R-3 building permit totals over the past
several years. While not all of ,these variances were granted, a.
sizable number of them were approved based on their own merits. It
appears that a certain percentage of the residential building
activity will result in circumstances for which individuals will •
request variances and the current) number of requests is a result
of the phenomenal growth level we are experiencing.
1981 198 .,2 1983 1984 19:85 1986 YTD
RESIDENTIAL PERMITS 358 392 .659 789 855 469
(R-1, R-2, R-3)
VARIANCE REQUESTS 16 10 18 31 24 15
REQUESTS AS PERCENT 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.03 0.03
OF REQUESTS
In addition, the protective inspections department indicates that
an average of five to ten potential variance situations per month •
are recognized and corrected at' the plan check or foundation
permit stage. This means that roughly seventy-five percent of the
potential variance requests are caught and corrected without requir-
ing a formal variance application.
A letter has been prepared for the City Administrator's signature
which requests additional attention to this matter on the part of
developers and builders. Hopefully this will reduce the number of
variance requests still further.
A inistrative Assistant
JH/mc
zo3
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P,0. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST
EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor
PHONE, (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN
June 11, 1986.JAMES A. SMITH
VAC ELLSON
THEODORE WACHTER
Coun ll Members
THOMAS HEDGES
s CIN P minislralor
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
The City of Eagan continues to experience an exceptional leveiler,0f
growth in both its residential and business communities. Last
year, the City had the most building permits of any city in the
state. This year we are ahead of that pace. The City intends to
continue to foster positive development, but the City Council has
expressed concern about two specific side-effects of this growth.
1. Variances. - The City continues to receive a number of
variance requests which do not represent true hardships
justifying such action. Most often, they result from
oversights in the survey or design of a project or an
attempt to maximize floor area on a limited lot size.
The Council has issued a strong statement that it does
not support variances of convenience and that the condi-
tions which give rise to such requests should be antici-
pated and corrected ahead of time. Variances exist to
allow flexibility for demonstrated hardships.
2. Weed Control - City ordinance requires that weeds/grass
not be allowed to grow higher than 12" in height, or have
gone to seed or are about to go to seed upon any platted
or residential lot. It is the duty of the owner to
remove or cut such weeds. The City has received an
alarming number of complaints this year regarding weeds
on vacant lots and asks that developers keep these areas
in suitable, maintained conditions.
The City Council and staff would appreciate your continued atten-
tion to these matters. We enjoy a high degree of quality develop-
ment and the little extra work on such details helps preserve the
quality of the whole community. If you have any questions on
these issues please feel free to contact the City staff.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
TLH/mc
ao�Z
THE LONE OAK TREE . THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
r.rt
MEMO TO: BOB CHILDERS, FIRE CHIEF
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 10, 1986
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR CHANGES IN THE ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE FOR FIRE ADMINISTRATION
Since May 30 when you unofficially announced your retirement from
the EaganVolunteer Fire Department and then more formally in a
letter received yesterday, it became appropriate to consider
alternatives for the future structure of our fire administration.
As you recall, at our late winter management by objectives
session, there was discussion by the City Council regarding the
hiring of full-time, Fire personnel. Positions that were
discussed at that time included a IFire Chief and/or Fire Marshal.
There was no formal consideration; however, it'was generally
agreed that during the development of the 1987 budget there would
be some consideration given to full-time administrative staffing
in the Fire Department.
The Fire Department is caught in the world of complexities such
as administrative practices, insurance liabilities, facility and. .
manpower planning and all the other considerations that must be
given to a growth community. Our part-time Fire Marshal is no
longer able to monitor all commercial, industrial and multifamily
buildings throughout the City for proper fire prevention or
thoroughly review all fires that occur within the City during the
calendar year. Demands are increasing with all facets of fire
administration as the community grows.
I applaud you and your officers for the time and commitment you
have given to our Volunteer Fire, Department. Any consideration
and review of full-time staffing should only reflect the •
preservation of continuing a job well done and an effort to meet
the demands of the future.
It is my understanding that District Chief Schindeldecker is
considered your assistant chief and will be acting in the
capacity of Fire Chief upon your official retirement July 6. It
is also my understanding that traditionally the volunteer Fire
Chief is elected by the Department and those elections are held
in November/December every three (3) years. Recognizing that we
are currently in a transition between your administration and a
new volunteer Fire Chief, it seems appropriate by the City
Council and this office that the City exp.lore all staffing
options and review as a part of'the 1987,budget preparation,
alternatives that might best suit the Volunteer Fire Department
as we consider our future administrative staffing in that
department.
It is my intention to survey otherjcommunities of comparable size
and ask how their fire administration and fire marshal services
'201
a
are staffed within their departments. A report will be prepared
and input provided by your administrative officers during the
month of July as budget considerations are furthur developed for
review and.consideration by the City Council.
Reorganization and change are two of the most feared words in the
English vocabulary. Please stress to your fire administration
that an organizational review for the future is no reflection on
their capability as officers of the Fire Department. It is
actually to the contrary and considered to be of a support nature
to the Fire Department by the mere fact that the City Council may
determine that full-time staffing is necessary in order, to
continue and improve upon a level of service that to date has
been provided by the volunteerism of our department.
I will stay in touch with you, and certainly after July 6 with
Dick, relating to the future of the fire administrative staff.
Please remember that the City Council has had only a brief
discussion at a management by objectives session and as a
® collective body has not had any deliberations or discussion
regarding future administrative staffing of the Fire Department.
All the information that this office will compile is considered
fact finding and will be presented in a report form.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at any time.
r
Sincerely,
1vZ61 . d
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Honorable Mayor S City Councilmembers
Dick Schindeldecker, Assistant Fire Chief/District Chief
Ken Southorn, District Chief
TLH/kf
ROUGH DRAFT
PRESS RELEASE
EAGAN AIR QUALITY TASK FORCE
METROPOLITAN NTE CONTROL COMMISSION AND THE CITY OF EAGAN
FORM AIR Q`11ALITY TASK FORCE
ST. PAUL, June 9, 1986 -- The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
(MWCC) and the City of Eagan have announced the formation of a task force
designed to improve air quality in Eagan.
The Eagan Air Quality Task Force will investigate MWCC and Eagan
citizens' concerns about the odors that have been present for the past
several summers in the Minnesota River Valley near MWCC's Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant (3750 Plant Road, Eagan).-
MWCC
agan).
MWCC and Eagan official's have been working together for the past several
.months to improve air quality. The Seneca Plant staff recently made a
number of process changes to help control any odors emanating from the
plant, and odor control systems similar to those used successfully
by Duluth's wastewater treatment facility were put into operation late
this spring.
t
An expansion of the Seneca Plant is scheduled to begin in the next two to
three years, and the task force will also examine the potential impact
of the expansion on Eagan air quality.
more
0-51
t
EAGAN TASK FORCE
Page 2
The mayor of Eagan, Bea Blomquist, and the manager of the Seneca Plant,
Jim Wawra, have mailed letters to more than 50 concerned citizens,
businesses and local officials inviting them to serve on the task force.
-fha )eider Boys in part,
"The management of the Seneca Plant is working with the City of Eagan
on the formation of an Eagan Air Quality Task Force 6ay the lettms.
"you have been selected as a neighboring resident who may have an interest
in serving on this committee to work with the Seneca staff in discussing
concerns, monitoring problems and recomIknding potential solutions."
® An informational meeting of the task force is scheduled to take \1 lace
Thursday, June 12, at 4:30 p.m. at Eagan City Hall. The participants
will discuss the current situation at the Seneca Plant, air quality in
Eagan and the plans for plant expansion. They will also make plans
for a future tour of the Seneca Plant.
-30-
1
Z.66
�A�Ao AIQ QuAL�ry 'rhsK FoQC� vhT�,
%i ipp
PEOPLES NATURAL GAS
June 2, 1986
Mr. Lowell Bahrke, Training Officer
Eagan Fire Department
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
RE: Natural Gas Fire Demonstration
'Dear Lowell:
3958 Sibley Memorial Highway
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
612-454-6080
Sometime ago, Chief Childers and you expressed an interest in sending some
of your department members to a natural gas fire demonstration. We at
Peoples Natural Gas Company combined with Northern Natural Gas Company are
pleased to invite your group to a training session to be held on Tuesday,
June 24, at 6:30 P.M. at the Northern Natural Gas Company compressor station
at Farmington (note enclosed location map). Fire departments participating
are Eagan, Rosemount, Farmington, Cannon Falls, Lakeville, New Market and
Webster.
The demonstrations are designed to familiarize your fire fighters with the
basics of natural gas, what to do when there is a fire involving natural
gas, and techniques of extinguishing fires involving natural gas (both with
hose streams and chemical extinguishers). The types of fires fire fighters
will be experiencing are natural gas fueled, discharging from an open pipe
horizontally and vertically. Also included will be fires simulating line
hits and stored flammable liquid fuels involved in natural gas fueled fires.
40 It should be advised in advance to all fire fighters planning to participate
in the actual demonstrations that full turn -out gear will be required.
Upon completion of the training session, a lunch will be served at the site.
We would appreciate your response by June 16 as to the number of fire fighters
attending. Should you have any questions please contact me at 454-6080 or
Mark Adelmann with Northern Natural Gas Company in Farmington at 463-7126.
e�ly,
R eh H.
Loca Manager
RHL:dlo
Enc.
cc: /Thomas Hedges, Eagan City Administrator
Jay Berthe, Eagan Chief of Police
G.F. Lovell, District Manager, Peoples Natural Gas, Farmington, MN
0. C. Reimer, District Manager, Northern Natural Gas, Farmington, MN
?D7
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1986
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
Building
152
615
Electrical
Plumbing
177
145
692
554
RVAC
137
578
Water Softener
28
134
Signs
$ 31,331.50
$ 15,665.75
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
n
n
1 40 4-11
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
unvrm: v
rM.
TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES
3
FOUNDATION
0
380
SINGLE FAMILY
80
$ 6,984,000
$ 31,331.50
$ 15,665.75
$ 176
18
DUPLEX
4
298,000
1,426.00
713.00
Am
8,626.0
91
TOWNHOUSE
32
1,791,000
9,593.00
4,796.50
65,989.0
7
CONDO
1
778,000
2,128.00
1,064.00
24,893.(:
0
APT BLDGS
0
0
AGRICULTURAL
0
9
COMMERCIAL
3
985,000
3,111.00
1,555.75
26,185.7
21
COMM/IND REMODEL
5
201,600
956.5b
415.75
.1,473.7
2
COMM/IND ADDITION
2
78,000
426.50
213.25
78
0
INDUSTRIAL
0
0
INSTITUTIONAL
0
3
PUBLIC FACILITIES
1
320,000
983.00
.491.50
8,908.5
' 9
RES. GARAGES
4
22,900
226.00
---
238.0
11
RES. ADDITIONS
2
20,000
161.00
58.25
229.2
4
SWIM POOL
4
36,900
304.00
55.25
402:7
57
MISCELLANEOUS
14
56,000
645.50
83.50
762.5
0
DEMOLISH
0
HOUSE MOVES
615
TOTALS
152
11,571,400
51,292.50
25,112.50
315,183.01
YEAR-TO-DATE 57,514,650
235,693.Ob
115,578.70
1,484,836.9
rM.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY.REPOBT
DATE MAY 1986
MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN
TYPE
# OF
PERMITS
# OF
BUILDINGS
# OF I
UNITS
VALUATION
PERMIT FEES
SURCHARGE
PLAN REVIEW
FEES
TOTAL FEES
DUPLEX
4
2
4
$ 298,000
$ 1,426.00
$; 149.00
$ 713.00
$ 8.,626.00
4-PLEX
32
8
32
1,791,000
9,593.00
895.50
4,796.50
65,989.00
6-PLEX
L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R
7-PLEX
3595 KRESTWOOD LN
STAN SCHULTZ
180,000
633.00
90.00
316.50
6,421.50
COMM/NEI
8-PLEX
1 RST M'HAHA
APT. BLDG
1380 DUCKWOOD DR
K CHARLES DEV
650,000
1,808.00
325.00
904.00
12,927..00
COMM/NEI
16 -UNIT
1
1
16
778,000
2,128.00
389.00
1,064.00
24,893.00
TOTALS
37
11
52
2,867,000
13,147.00
1,433.50
6,573.50
99,508.00
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN
BLDG
PERMIT
STATE
PLAN REV
PERMIT #
ADDRESS & LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATION
FEE
SURCHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUP.
11912
1275 TOWN CENTRE DR
BURGER KING
$ 155,000
$ 670.50
$ 77.50
$ 335.25
6,837.25
COMM/NEI
L 1 B 1 TOWN CTR 70 3R
11934
3595 KRESTWOOD LN
STAN SCHULTZ
180,000
633.00
90.00
316.50
6,421.50
COMM/NEI
1 RST M'HAHA
11992
1380 DUCKWOOD DR
K CHARLES DEV
650,000
1,808.00
325.00
904.00
12,927..00
COMM/NEI
L 1 B 1 EAGAN CONV CTR
12022
3945 LEXINGTON AVE SO
ADVENT UNITED
320,000
983.00
160.00
491.50
8,908.50
P.F./NEI
L 1 B 1 ADVENT UNITED
METH. CHURCH
11982
4215 NICOLS RD
JIM PERSONS
65,000
328.00
32.50
164.00
524.50
COMM/ADI
L 2, B 25, SECT 30
11905
3323 RIVER BLUFF DR
TORCHWOOD
13,000
98.50
6.50
49.25
154.25
COMM/AD]
L 12, B_l, ROBERT KARATZ
PROPERTIES
11877
3340 PILOT KNOB RD
AM. ASSOC. OF
25,500
175.00
13.00
87.50
275.50
COMM/REI
L 6, B 3, EFFRESS ADD
CEREAL CHEM.
11993
2600 EAGAN WOODS DR
EAGAN WOODS
12,700
98.50
6.50
49.25
154..25
COMM/REI
L 1. B 1 EAGAN WOODS
LAND LTD PTNE
22996
1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD
FEDERAL LAND
5,400
56.50
3.00
---
59.50
COMM/RE!
L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100
' _h'+{Ya•o-L :.. �!T.ev-.. 4.-NW.aT .� .:. ene'-. ..: •.:: .- ._ �A, -- . ..:: -:........
MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION
DATE: MAY 1985
C
NUMHER OF
NUMBER OF
PERMIT
SUR-
SUR-
PLAN CHECK
TYPE
OF PERMITS
BUILDINGS
N
VALUATIONS
W
P
N
P
W
W
4 -UNIT
O
O
W
O
T0WNHOUSE
32
8
32
1,798,000
9,646.00
899.00
4,827.00
67,368.0,
6 -UNIT
1270 EAG AN INp ND bl
TOWNHOUSE
NO IN
NW MTL LIFE
1600 000
4,183.00
800.00
2,091.50
27 129.50
COMM
8 -UNIT
1243 EACAN IND RD
LEXINGTON
TOWNHOUSE
L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1
P
r
108.00
Y
O
O
A
(1
r
r
m
O
a
T
ri
10,683.00
2,100.00
•-1
Y
.�
T
i
2
m
r
[al
O
O
y
t'
y
r
CA
i
36
2,008,000
m
1,004.00
5,404.00
71,217.0
V!
r
F
r
ti
L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P
H
i 36.000
220.00
H
110.00
348.00
COMM
1253 EAC IND RD
10236
2..AC CTR IND
MJS SYSTEMS
45,000
260.50
22.50
130.25
40.25
W
W
10252
L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM
20
P
C
O
324.00
2,781.00
O
O
O
C
O
P
�
N
C
N
I
I
W
O
y
W
0
0
0
a
0
0 0
o
0
0
'm
N
_
C
P
W
N
m
m
c
C m
0
0
o
O
o
0
o m
9
W
N c
1
1
C
m
_
1
u
1
I
I
I
C
W
T
N
O
U
O
O
m
0
N
P
O
O
W
W
u O
C
•O
�
1
I
I
P
.WO
W
�
c
c
0
0
o
T
m
0
0
o
m
MATT-FAMTIV RRFAVnnW
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION
DATE: MAY 1985
BUILDING
NUMBER
NUMHER OF
NUMBER OF
PERMIT
SUR-
SUR-
PLAN CHECK
TYPE
OF PERMITS
BUILDINGS
UNITS
VALUATIONS
PERMIT FEES I
CILIRCE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
4 -UNIT
4955 PILOT KNOB RD
T0WNHOUSE
32
8
32
1,798,000
9,646.00
899.00
4,827.00
67,368.0,
6 -UNIT
1270 EAG AN INp ND bl
TOWNHOUSE
NO IN
NW MTL LIFE
1600 000
4,183.00
800.00
2,091.50
27 129.50
COMM
8 -UNIT
1243 EACAN IND RD
LEXINGTON
TOWNHOUSE
L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1
723.00
108.00
361.50
1,192.50
COMM
APT. OR
1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD
CONDO
L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100
FED LAND CO
4,200,000
10,683.00
2,100.00
5,341.50
51,415.50
COMM
2-PLEX
4
2
4
210,000
1,162.00
105.00
581.007,849.00`
TOTALS
36
10
36
2,008,000
10,808.00
1,004.00
5,404.00
71,217.0
BUILDING
PERMIT
SUR-
PLAN CHECK
PERMIT 8
ADDRESS 4 LEGAL
OWNER
VALUATIONS
FEE
CHARGE
FEES
TOTAL FEES
OCCUr.,
10191
4955 PILOT KNOB RD
B 78 .F ION 33
T. JEPPESF.N
22,000
3 152.50
11.00
76.25
239.75
ACRIC
1270 EAG AN INp ND bl
10199
NO IN
NW MTL LIFE
1600 000
4,183.00
800.00
2,091.50
27 129.50
COMM
10206
1243 EACAN IND RD
LEXINGTON
L 6 B 2. F.AC CTR 1ND PK 1
723.00
108.00
361.50
1,192.50
COMM
10209
1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD
L 1 B 1 TWO 'NTE100
FED LAND CO
4,200,000
10,683.00
2,100.00
5,341.50
51,415.50
COMM
4175 LEXB54INGTOSF.CTN
7 AVE2J
10216
L
NW BELL TELF.P
25,000
170.50
12.50
85.25
268.25
COMM
10235
4178 KNOB DRIVE
L 2 B 2 KNOB HILL PROF P
NOSTALGIC HOME
i 36.000
220.00
18.00
110.00
348.00
COMM
1253 EAC IND RD
10236
2..AC CTR IND
MJS SYSTEMS
45,000
260.50
22.50
130.25
40.25
COMM
2109 CLIFF RD
10252
L 2 B 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMM
FED LAND CO
186,000
648.00
93.00
324.00
2,781.00
COMM
LJ1l u
I
— I<c3p(=>sia .Kerir)els
GERMAN SHORTHAIRED POINTERS
Puppies - Grown Dogs - Stud Service
Eagan City Council
3830 Pilot Knob ad
Eagan, MN 55122
Gentlemen:
1560 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MINN. 55121
454.503) — A..A Coo. 612
June 7, 1'986
I have just come home from a run through beautiful Eagan and am
moved to write to thank whoever has instituted the system of
® Bike paths.. .Eagan or Dakota County...... with a request to please
continue the system. It is a relief to be able to run off the
roads whenever possible. I look forward to more bike paths being
developed as time goes by.
Another thank you to Eagan for the development of so many parks
and "green spaces". As our city grows I believe it is very im-
portant to coninue to add green space as a buffer for the many
housing developments going up. This morning I ran by the new
Blue Cross -Blue Shield Neighborhood 'ark which is being developed,
and then I ran through Black Hawk Park, on the newly -mowed trail
How beautifull Wonderful hill -climbing work, too, for this runner!
In this vein, I would like our leaders to consider yet another
green space:
We own eight acres of land on Yankee Doodle Rd., bordered on the
east by Surrey Heights and on the west by the Eagan Water Treatment
facility. On our eight acres is a duck pond and it is surrounded
by beautiful wooded grounds. Our house is, we believe , one of the
pioneer farmhouses in Eagan (our deed reads 1890) and when we moved
here in 1956 to Eagan Township, was known as "The Old Heimel Place".
Yankee Doodle was a narrow dirt country lane and there was nothing
else out here except a few farms.
One cannot stop progress, however, and now Eagan is a busy growing
progressive city. Our back pasture (Dr. Lyle Hay's land) has been
sold and is being developed now for individual homes.. . It has
occurred to us that it might be very smart of Eagan to set aside
this picturesque chunk of land as green space -park, for the en-
joyment of all the people who presently live in Surrey Heights and
will be living in the new development in the back pasture. Walking
"nature trails" could be developed, and picnic areas here and there.
The house could possibly be maintained as a pioneer farmhouse......
When
a it
stop breeding better dogs -- You stop breeding good dogs
or removed to make way for more useable space along the
Yankee Doodle, Rd. segment.
If Eagan would be interested in seeing our land and/or talking
about it, we will be pleased to hear from you.
Thank you for your consideration of this proposal.
Sincerely yours,
C -
Mrs. D Sandberg
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 19.6
14445 DIAMOND PATH
ROSEMOUNT. MINNESOTA 55068
June 5, 1986
Mayor Bea Blomquist
City Hall "
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
NORTHVIEW ELEMENTARY
■ROBERT E. FERGUSON
454-4134
Dear Mayor Blomquist,
In behalf of the students and the faculty at Northview School, I would like
• to express our deep gratitude to the Eagan Police Department for furnishing
us with Officer Larry Billmeyer and his Intern Officer for our Bicycle Safety
Program. It was extremely successful even if we did have rain on the first
day. We resumed the program on the following Monday morning and completed
it on that day. For the past four years that we have had this program at
Northview School we have not experienced any fatal accidents of students
who have been in this program. _I think it is a fantastic program. I would
like to compliment Officer Billmeyer and Police Chief Jay Berthe for cooperating
with us in this community endeavor. I would also like to thank the Eagan Police
Department for the School Patrol picnic that they sponsored. It was just
outstanding to have the local Police Department work so closely with the schools
and the school patrol, thus making it possible for our studentsto arrive and leave
school as safely as possible.
Sincerely,
Robert E. Fergua`on
d/6
APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF
14200 Cedar Avenue
Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124
June 3, 1986
Fire Chief Bob Childers
Eagan Fire Department
3800 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Dear Chief Childers,
Once again I would like to offer our sincere thanks to your department
for responding to our mutual aid call for help.
Yesterday, June 2, our department was in Rosemount helping their department
fight a structure fire. The call required our department to utilize all
our rigs and manpower, which left Apple Valley without fire -,coverage.
Thanks to your department we felt secure in the knowledge that your
dedicated firefighters could and would respond to our mutual aid call.
Again, thank you cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
APPLE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT
Richard W. Tuthill
Fire Chief
It
XC: Eagan City Council'/
•
r.
c... immediate Release:
REPRINTED FROM JUNE
METRO MONITOR
For more information
contact the Public
Information Office
612/291.6464
Sen Reddick
291-6422
Five Solid Waste Resource Recovery Friday,
Plants Now Planned for Region May 30; 1986
This year, and for every year in recent memory, 95 percent of the region's
trash will be hauled to landfills to be unceremoniously buried.
is
That's about to change. Five big solid waste resource recovery plants are
currently being planned by Twin Cities Area counties and private firms.
Together, the plants will be capable of handling more than 4,000 tons of
trash every day, or about 72 percent of the region's trash.
Last month Dakota County decided'to build a waste -to -energy plant that
--would process about 735 tons of'trash per day. The resource recovery company,
P.L.M. Selberg's/Westinghouse, will own and operate the $90'million plant, to
be"built in Rosemount: The project will house an operation to produce refuse -
derived fuel (RDF) from trash, and boilers and generators to convert it into
electrical energy...
The project's fuel production will be accomplished with equipment made by
Swentec, Inc., a Swedish firm. Westinghouse will burn the fuel and sell the
electrical energy to Northern States Power Co.
Dakota County decided against sending its garbage to a joint
Ramsey/Washington County trash -to -energy plant in Newport, the region's only
trash -processing plant currently under construction. The Ramsey/Washington
plant, owned and operated by NSP, is scheduled to begin operation in the fall
of 1987. The plant will take 1,000 ton�trash per day from the two counties
and turn it into RDF.
NSP will burn the RDF to produce electricity at its power plants in Red
Wing and Mankato. Construction is projected to cost $31 million. Annual
operating costs will range from $5 million to $7 million. The plant will
recover materials such as iron and aluminum for recycling.
Hennepin County plans to start construction of a third big plant, a $70
million garbage -burning plant to be located in downtown Minneapolis, in the
spring of 1987. The plant, to be located at 5th St. N. and 6th Av. N., will
burn 1,000 tons of trash per day beginning in 1990.
The Hennepin plant, intended to greatly reduce the need for landfill space
in the region, will get its trash from Hennepin County, excluding Minneapolis
and three other cities (see Reuter project below). The trash will come from
four "transfer stations," located throughout the county.
Transfer stations are to be located in Bloomington, Brooklyn Park and
Minneapolis. Last month the Hennepin County Board decided to look at locating
the fourth transfer station in Eden Prairie instead of Hopkins.
The Council is preparing a final environmental impact statement (EIS) on
the plant and transfer sites for the county. It will issue the EIS for public
review June 129 and will vote on the adequacy of the study June 26.
Reuter, Inc. has laid the footings for the region's fourth major resource
recovery project. It's a $9 million effort in Eden Prairie that will -turn 400
tons a day of mixed municipal solid waste into fuel pellets. The plant, which
will have an annual operating budget of $4 million, is expected to be up and
running in October.
Minneapolis is negotiating a contract with the company to provide 350
tons of trash per day. Hopkins, Minnetonka and Shorewood have agreed to
provide another 50.tons per day.
Reuter plans to turn at least half the waste it receives into combustible
more v4
Pellets for sale to firms that currently burn coal or natural gas. About 15
percent of the waste will be glass, metals and plastics, which will be
separated and recycled. In the second year of operation, the company plans to
compost a portion of the residuals.
The Council recommended approval of Reuter's facility permit request in
March. "If Hennepin Council would give us the garbage, we'd like to build
another 400 -ton -per -day plant in the: county," said James Reuter, vice
president. "The county has a lot of garbage left that needs to find a home,
but not in the ground."
NSP will build, own and operate the region's f fth.resource recovery plant,
® with a capacity of 1,000 tons per day, in Sherburne.County.'s Elk. River. Trash
will come from Anoka County and possibly more from Hennepin and other counties
north and west of the seven -county region.
The $53 million plant will produce RDF to be burned for electrical power
primarily at United Power Assoc., a utility in Elk River. The plant, scheduled
to begin operation in 1989, is expected to have an annual operating budget of
$8.7 million. The -project will separate and recycle iron, aluminum and
possibly other materials.
Scott and Carver Counties are currently negotiating with firms to build a
resource recovery plant to serve their areas.
-30-
a17
*(I1 a X11 )Iemi,
,
3218 Snelling Ave. Minneapolis, MN 55406 -
61'1-729-5205
April 5, 1986
City Administrator
Thomas Hedges
t830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN. 55121
Dear Mr. Hedges,
For the past seven years the Blue Bell Ice Cream truck has
been a summer companion to thousands of Eagan residents young
and old alike. I am..writing this letter in the hope that I
can convince the council to allow us to operate in Eagan
once again. Late last summer I received a letter from the
City explaininq that Eagan City Code,. sec. 9.15 —Prohibiting
parking for the purpose of advertising or ceiling
merchandise, was going to be strictly enforced. We complied
with the request and did not operate after receiving the
letter. We did however receive numerous calls (not just from
children) inquiring as, to the Whereabouts of the "ice cream
man".
The point in the letter requesting we cease operation
mentioned a safety hazard. We consider ourselves a very
safety conscious company and train our drivers extensively
with both written and slide safety programs. In support of
our safety record I would like to present certain facts: We
have operated in Eagan from approximately May ist through
September 1st each year. The truck works an average of six
days per week and sells an average of 200 ice cream bars per
day. That means over our seven years of operation vie have
sold about 150,000 ice cream bars. In all this time and with
all those sales we have never had a single accident take
place. I feel this is an excellent record and if we are
allowed to operate again our commitment to safety will
remain just as strong. I am enclosing a letter from our
insurance carrier explaininq our limits of liability and our
safety record.
I am also enclosing the results of a recent Saturday
afternoon survey we took in Eagan asking people if they
wanted to have the ice cream truck back in their
neighborhoods. I am happy to report that at least 98. of the
people we asked said they saw no reason we should not be
allowed to operate.
In recent, years the cities of Richfield, St. Louis Park,
Mound and Fridley have altered their ordinances to allow
ice cream trucks. I am enclosing a copy of a letter from the
city manager of Richfield explaining his experience with
Blue Bell. (The letter was originally written to the city of
St. Cloud in support of our application to vend there.) I am
also enclosing copies of the altered ordinances from these
cities in the hope they can be used as a model in Eagan.
WI,
W
The Blue Feil truck has .also provided a welcome summer job,
usuilly for an Eagan college student.
In conclusion, we are asking that the council consider a way
for the "ice cream man/women" to be able to come back to
Eagan. We feel our record shows that we have been a
responsible and safety conscious company. We also feel we
have provided a desired service in a fun and positive
manner. I would be happy to work with the city to develop a
ordinance that would allow our operation. Thant: you for your
consideration of this proposal.
Sincerely;
r �n
Glenn Baron
Blue Bell Ice Cream Inc.
'219