No preview available
 /
     
07/15/1986 - City Council RegularAGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JULY 15, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Parks & Recreation Department B. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA pa's f -E. 1\ lf�.lIH. PC16�.�1. .l4J. �vx0K. e t -V: Pa.'s Personnel Items Contractors Licenses Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation/ Retirement to 18 Months Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Office Park 2nd) Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) Project 439, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) Project 441, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (O'Neil Pond Outlet) Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating) Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition Final Plat Approval, Overhill Farm 2nd Addition Final Plat Approval, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition Project 85-M, Final Acceptance (Wescott Hills 4th Addition -Storm Sewer) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS ,P� ?1A. Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets ASB. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition �a �rlC. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition _ Sanitary Sewer (Continued from July 1, 1986, meeting) OOn,SIE. Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Rd. -Trunk Storm Sewer 9OF. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of fib, Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City (Continued from the June 17, 1986, Meeting) VI. OLD BUSINESS Qn,ga A. Off -Sale Liquor License for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) Continued from June 17, 1986, Meeting P� q3 B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments VII. NEW BUSINESS f 5A. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/Dakota County HRA First -Time Homebuyers Program B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation) Duplex Lot Split for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lot 5, Block 3, Abutting Vienna Lane, NE pG 1/4 of Section 31 C. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 S.F. of Addi- tional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign, Dakota County Bank, Lot 2, Block 2, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park D. Rezoning (Overhill Properties, Inc.) from R-2, Residential Double, to R-1, Residential Single, for Lots 1,2,5,6,&7, of Block 2, Overhill Farm lst Addition, Located at Dodd & Cliff Roads, SW 1/4 of Section 25 E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company - U Mark Baird) for an Advertising Sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Located South of I-494 & East of Pilot Knob Road, NW 1/4 of Section 3 pa,l� '. Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition 00 (Sienna Corporation) Consisting of 69 Single Family Lots on Approximately 34 Acres Located West of Dodd Road & North of ---- Cliff Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25 q \16G. Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office P O Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant on Approximately 7 Acres & a Rezoning from GB (General Business) & LI (Light Industrial) to Commercial Planned Development & a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment on Lots 1,2,&3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park & Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, Located at Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive, NW 1/4 of Section 3 H. Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds (Robert Engstrom) \ O Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19.6 Acres & a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) Abutting Pilot Knob Road to the West, South of St. John Neumann Church, SW 1/4 of Section 22 jAAI. Preliminary Plat for The Trails of Thomas Lake (New Horizon �C) Homes) Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units on Approximately 14 Acres Located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, North of Clemson \S`II & West of Thomas Lake Road, NW 1/4 of Section 28 J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments (Design Collective) Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres & a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) Located South of Violet Lane Abutting Federal Drive, SE 1/4 of Section 16 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS f, ,146 A. League of Minnesota Cities Sound Level Meter Program �(J B. Public Improvement Projects (A 1. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicols Road) Ir�� 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) M. 3. Contract 86-11, Award Contract (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham p \x'.1'13 Corporate Center) I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) IA 16151104 3 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM. CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 10, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the July 15, 1986, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the July 1 meeting and special minutes for the June 26 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: DEPARTMENT, HEAD BUSINESS; A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item L. Parks and Recreation Department --At the July 1, 1986, City Council meeting, the Parks & Recreation Director and Advisory Commission were given direction to proceed with further negotia- tions on expanding the acreage of Northview Athletic Field and to acquire the 15 acre Ohman parcel adjacent to the Fairway Hills plat. Regarding consideration to purchase the Barr parcel located on Highway 3 for a future athletic site, was continued and the Director of Parks & Recreation was asked analyze certain tracts of land throughout the City that might be available for _ ___future athletic fields and present a map and findings to the City Council for review. That study has been completed and for a copy of the study, refer to pages 7i through 5 . The Director of Parks & Recreation will be available to review the. study during Department Head Business. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the Director of Parks & Recreation and Advisory Commission regarding land acquisition for a future athletic field site. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 9, 1986 HE: ATHLETIC SITE ACQUISITION At the City Council meeting on July 1, the City Council reviewed Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation for athletic site purchases. The City Council approved the Commission's recommendation for the acquisition ® and development of two of the three sites. The third site was continued pending further reviewal. Council expressed some concern over the proximity of this parcel to the City's eastern edge, and a desire for a more centrally located facility. Staff was asked to provide information concerning which other parcels had been reviewed, and the general process for searching and reviewing alternative locations. Attached to this memorandum are three graphics, which will help to depict the process Staff used in searching out suitable parcels. The first graphic locates all commercial and industrial property, and properties which have been —platted for residential or other purposes. - Other parcels blotted out are existing park holdings, public facilities such as school property. The second graphic depicts parcels which Staff and Commission have reviewed. The extent of each reviewal varied with the particular parcel. Some parcels were explored and rejected, because of severe topography. Other parcels were ® reviewed, but excluded because an indication of a high sales price. Finally, others were reviewed after preliminary site planning was initiated. The final composite shows remaining parcels which have not been reviewed, but were excluded for one reason or another. An intensive review can be made on any of these parcels, if the Council feels it would be appropriate to review and discuss these further. Staff was also directed to review the parcel immediately south of the City's municiple center. This parcel is approximately 8.74 acres in size, and abutts Pilot Knob Road. This parcel is currently being offered for sale with a $70,000 asking price. Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan has prepared a concept plan for this site. This concept plan will be presented at the Council meeting. KV/bls v STAFF REVIEWED PARCELS 8' s{MENAOTA �nrs. \�'_' C _ _" \ Vii/ • •I , _ J M Yt Ilii � 4 - � ' ^ e •�I'I I � � l� :rte' �® I > _ A ./Aa e KP VIII LI I I ��. •( \ Y • � ]Y, • / � � • • i� �I a E •• J 1 ,I d a. V III f �7i • • I'' po .w e "� ^ �. •• l �Yn P't+ � • } 3 �, _'E.� f$.% � � 14.E 6e • tU Ftp ,. y • A L. iswl •7a IMF / :::^ A I •� � _ — _ � —. I • • M � � ` w• 1 I � Y d 1, w ., � ., • � I• ` ro w II w I( I .1111 . ri °7 �n • • � qZ • 1' IA wr •1 , v • /r) I�r • / 1. I bo• '• Illl I ._..�_. e'• J I .. •, 1 I .. I 111 I r w. /'F'� p ^ -c ro <� •a . -x r l + •! n 1 }. . we rl V f ,J ptttr.i ' �. gyp' I ro.. Ix `_ ' I w `'/ 1 � ��I rr- r ',f�T "'IIIIIM.:'r CXPI'� 7k _ • � r' � M _ w `rr.V AKPF � y r M E�.i Z� •� u 14 r •.c t1 Q : / �` M� F r / 1 • y r SII ��I I {, � �c n+�-«St4 ��I •pry ,',>I� p'L� `,., p�lj �' 00 i JA_LE v>LLEY NOSEYOUNi Zoning Map - City of Eagan Zoning Map Indexing 1-11 I(O!( ' u - unne rnun rr - nm w. !�•♦•••1•,A• •♦ IIIA•.•♦ 241t 5 Jdw.41i .. III N♦I ••I•' • - i•I.IA11•. •. n • Oia O••�••i �� �ie�� �••eI,�1A1111•111•a•♦♦I,I I+#�i�-' raw ••O •. r` •♦♦• •••• d�!%�•��.�•.♦.�•.I.�.I.�.♦.♦111♦.♦.e' ♦ iiiri�J� ►w•wp0• �. ►L,♦I♦IIQwQ♦o1,►101i11•ii•.O•i\ • J �s s0•✓. 0 . !•p•..•i/E.- '.I `OO•IO •eI�1AA �As•.O•Ois • V,• i '.•i :•i••;Jri �' •� J�LO.!• J �.. « w1 • ♦wwl/♦Iw r♦ I 1 •.Q•I♦♦I�"IIIA. va :.. •III . I • � �,r,��.lfw•�%r .i�� } { !i•Ir i f ••i ♦ r • '. J • .�0�•e.♦� � - R" !),fJnS. 4 .r•.♦� - '.p' V, •..•Ilii •r Ws6 .;111 I JI�IirI•Jjr1•I�I• fig.• izF.•. ♦ l - 1 • J' - I•o' !Ir• •di i , Ric o ' y", �I is ••• I S ) 1�..'t 5 i 1' A.. 142 7A ppl •y�1 �Y11 �••• r I i 31 I ABY Y NAA46 11,7' +� f Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Receive Peti ion, Wescott Road (Streets) --Enclosed on pages through is a copy of a petition received from several residents of the South Hills Addition as referenced on page _� requesting a reduction in speed limit and the improving of khat gravel portion of Wescott Road, between the highline crossing and South Hills Addition. Enclosed on page /() is a map showing the relationship of the present improved section from Elrene Road to T.H. 149 along with that segment being constructed under Contract 86-13. Prior to the improvement of this remaining half - mile section of Wescott Road, it will be necessary to install the appropriate utilities to service potential future development of adjacent properties. Therefore, if the Council is to give any consideration to this requested improvement, it should consider not only the street improvement but also the required underlying utilities. During 1985, the City requested Mn Dot District 9 to perform speed aurveys--on various streets -within the City of Eagan to determine the appropriate enforceable speed limit that would be approved by the Commissioner of Transportation. The results of that study indicated that the portion from South Hills Drive to T.H. 149 should be established as 50 M.P.H. with that portion from Lexington Avenue to South Hills Drive (gravel) not posted. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition •for the upgrading of Wescott Road and order/deny the installation of appropriate improvements. I RECEIVED 3 1958.; We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently increased speed limit of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. 44/f �st� J'osz 457- 7J Aa ✓ 4L�T-'�F�z�>:i J I RECEIVED ,i uic We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently increased speed limit'of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. 6 woe I \� as 9 ok- .� •ti r M ..• e Iy7Y� w 1 �i •quo'. y 1 f . i`� '' 3Air� y'.:q� .... • 4� •� .i'i•�4. � . i b ADTION DI��--,:a >l�. �/ji�.,a�O'10 4 f ... ••'vy- aw'r � q4Q, u p' 12 14 t1• Q ,r •�. r.wat. rw.,. � O ''10� w • 1 r LLJ Is �.i � � - ur"w .or-- i}::4;149;:{: ::::.,:::•:. }:i• io . �� _�— p ' LANE . . .�+.60U9N wlLw Iwr .... •�1„„ l �c \ Ik- . � ,s•��, � Ix lep W. 4 in Ri"i ; - • .:. ”. - . ••�: ii}rr':L:::' ••'�' •••':i}iii}}. • . _ •..vr •':: }i: i.. ' i y O . •' ••' �.+j:: i _, ..e . .o -z Sou •••. �m°° :':';,:ifs••.; ,y UJ jr Q MILL] t.b ✓r to �'� •�w .r WESCOTT •• ..•w...• • ..• ROAD i . WE COTT "Bass wall PFZ lTtow St Gu ecis N. Vg. 1/4 af'i, 24, T� F� p' Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three There are fifteen (15) items on ,the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussionrequired in brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: •Item 1.. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Fourteen applications were received by the City for the vacant position of part-time, clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. Of these applications, six applicants were given typing tests, written tests., and, were interviewed. It.'is the recommendation of Administrative Assistant Duffy and Administrative Secretary Finnegan that Corrine Smith be hired to fill the vacant clerk -typist position'. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Corrine Smith to fill the vacant position of clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. The appointment is to be effective July 14, 19'86. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four CONTRACTOR LICENSE B. Contractor's Licenses -=Attached- on page /3 is a list of contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client's permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDEREDON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of Contractor Licenses are presented. • 0 iv i CONTRACTORS' LICENSE JULY 15, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. FIRST LANDMARK BUILDERS 2. HOMECARE, INC 3. HOUSTON CONSTRUCTION 4. MADERA HOMES INC 5. MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO 6. MIDWEST FENCE & MFG CO ® 7. MOE-OSUM CONSTRUCTION CO 8. M.J. MOSER CONSTRUCTION 9. MARTIN SCHUTROP CONST 10. T.J. CONTRACTING INC BEATING/VENTILATING 1. AIR REFRIGERATION 2. ALBERS SHEETMETAL & VENT 3. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG ® PLUMBING 1. DAVE DEMPSEY PLBG. 2. FREEPORT HARDWARE (PHIL'S PLBG & HTG) 3. LICHLITER BROS 4. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG 5. MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES INC 6. NIKKO PLBG 7. QUALITY PLBG. 8. ROSEVILLE PLBG & HTG INC 9. TERRY'S PLUMBING 10. WOODBURY MECHANICAL INC Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five EXTENSION OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE C. Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation or Retirement to Eighteen Months --On April 7, 1986, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) was signed into law by President Reagan. COBRA requires an employer to provide the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees and dependents to the following limits: 1. Eighteen month's from the date of termination of employment, for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct or reduction of hours; or from the date of reduction • in an employee's hours, if such a reduction causes a loss or reduction of the employee's coverage. 2. 36 months for the employee's spouse and dependent children from the date of: a. The death of the covered employee. . b. Divorce or legal separation of the covered employee. C. The covered employee becomes entitled to benefits under Medicare. d. A dependent child ceases to be eligible as a dependent according to the terms of the insurance plan. Continuation of coverage will end prior to either. the 18 or 36 month period as of the date on which: • 1. The person covered under the continuation fails to make timely payments as required under the plan., 2. The continued person becomes eligible under another group medical plan. 3. The continued dependent becomes eligible for Medicare. 4. A spouse who is continuing because of divorce or legal separation remarries and becomes covered under a group health plan. 5. The group health plan, insured or self-insured, ends. The continuation coverage is required to be identical to the coverage provided to persons actively participating in the plan. The necessary premium may be required to be paid by the person whose coverage is continued. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM C. (continued') State Law currently requires continuation for 12 months instead of 18 months, and this, is the procedure that the City of Eagan has been following,. It is recommended that this continuation period be extended to 18 months to 'conform to Federal law. The entire cost of the premium will be paid by the person whose coverage is continued. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the City of Eagan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees and depen- dents to 18 or 36 months (depending upon the circumstances) as provided by Federal law from the date of termination of employ- ment for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct_. 0 1-'5 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 446, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 2ND ADDITION D. Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale office Park 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assess- ment roll completed. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 446 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addi- tion) and schedule the public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 43.5, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER, PUBLIC HEARING EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK) E. Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roil/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) --Final costs for the installation of streets and utilities to service the above referenced subdivision have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adop- tion. aACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 435 (Eagan Woods. Office Park) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 439, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING SAFARI 2ND ADDITION F. Project 439, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Safari 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 439 (Safari 2nd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. ,/( Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 441, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC G. Project 441, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Qrder Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Westbury 3rd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 441 (Westbury 3rd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. 43, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING O'NEIL TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET H. Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --Although construction is not, 1008 complete on the above referenced project, all assess- ments associated with this project are trunk area rates which are not dependent upon the final costs of the project_ Subsequent- ly,, the final assessment roll using these set trunk area assessment rates .have been completed. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 443 (O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. 17 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine CONTRACT 86-8, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 1986 SEALCOATING I. Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating)--At the July 1 Council meeting, the Council received bids and awarded the contract for the 1986 Sealcoating Program to Allied Blacktop - ping. Due to the exceptional bids received, the 1986 program based on bids received ($69,775.58) was considerably below the 1986 budget ($122,000.00)_ Subsequently, the Council directed the Staff to review our Sealcoating Program and work with the contractor to determine if additional streets could be added to this year's contract to take advantage of the exceptional bids received. Staff has prepared a Change Order which would add approximately $50,805.00 to the sealcoating contract bringing the total amount to $120,580.63. Enclosed on page is a listing of streets that are being added to this year' program under this Change Order. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #1 to Contract 86-8 (1986 Sealcoating) in the amount of $50,8'05.05. PAGE NO. 00001 07/10/86 STREET NAME Thomas Ln Richard's Ct Walden Dr Kirkwood Dr Parkview Ln labbert Cir udbury Ln Sheffield Ln Sheffield Cir Shevlin Ct Golfview Ln ** TOTAL ** PAGE NO. 00001 - 07/10/86 - 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -2 AGGREGATE FROM Cliff Rd Thomas Ln Thomas Ln Lexington Av Lexington Av Parkview Ln Wilderness Run Rd Sherwood Way Sheffield Ln Sherwood Way Yankee Doodle TO 200' W of Walden CDS CDS Parkview Ln CDS CDS Wilderness Run Rd Norwood Dr CDS CDS Dead End 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -3 GRANITE AGGREGATE STREET NAME FROM 11!cmserve Dr Yankee Doodle Rd Towerview Rd Pilot Knob Rd Slater Rd Cliff Rd Robin Ln Blackhawk Rd Blackhawk Rd Cliff Rd Slater Rd Cinnamon Rdg Trl Cinnanom Ridge Trl Cliff Rd Rahn Way Rahn Rd Rahn Rd Cliff Rd Cedarview Dr Old Cedar Hwy Library Park'g Lot ** TOTAL ** 01101 TH 13 CDS Storland Rd Blackhawk Rd Diffley Rd Cinnamon Trl Slater Rd Dead End Rahn Way Cedarvale Blvd SQ.YDS. 4786 2230 2400 1927 4260 1166 5038 2530 1430 2033 2836 30636 SQ. YDS. 9416 4820 19452 8665 26350 6036 8836 1476 2959 4504 9435 101949 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten 478, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT J. Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) --Recently, staff received an application for development of the property east of Lexington Avenue and north of Dffley Road. While this appli- cation is being processed through the Planning Commission at their July meeting to be considered by Council in August, the developer has requested that the preliminary study and feasibility report be initiated to provide the sanitary sewer service necessary for this parcel's development. Recognizing that there are no is guarantees of approval through this staff/commission/council review process, yet guaranteed all costs associated with this report and detailed plans and specifications., if for some reason this project is not approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 478 (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) and order the feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications. 479, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILI INGTON NORTHVIEW PARK - TRUNK STORM S] K. Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) --Similar to the reasoning associated with the petition for Project 478 discussed previously, the developer of the Lexington South PUD (Jim Curry) •has requested the Council to prepare the feasibility report and detailed plans for the installation of trunk storm sewer facilities for that area east of Lexington Avenue between Northview Park entrance road and Diffley Road. This trunk storm sewer will be necessary for the development of Lexington Avenue in 19'88 and any earlier development of land within this portion of the Lexington South PUD. Mr. Curry has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report and detailed plans if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, and order the feasibility report and detailed plans. P6 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER ADDITION L. Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Wyndham Corporate Center Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road opposite Corporate Center Drive,by the Trammel Crow Corporation: Enclosed on pages and 7-'3 are copies of the legally described final plat and site plan for the construction of the Eagan Woods Garden Hotel, showing the modification of the road entrance to Pilot Knob Road. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat at the time of approval by Council action on August 20, 1985, have been complied with,. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM•: To approve the final plat for Wyndham Corporate Center Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N 4F-XHISIT "A" • WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER [�yo..w.,� Asa.. yL.l y4raum LOT BLOCK ----n....�.[-. •lr yr.r�•/s.. a, ria. �......F--7-- 4 �f ril ILSr L16 W IY L,, 1 V S[[. . w u u,nYl Imm > ,o -x,' Id ♦O + e j 1 O - x YI1. H o i t Yrnrlle. awn ss[.uvY 1. C •1•Aa.YeI.Y.Owu4- R � on.vm orzo. ` (ai Ill{ bl •:Inill(o a umnun w rn .l .. e(e) :'I vti-A+•u•.741-C ava.a I Y •�•ly r .u'.:.. 1 I I -------- - EeOJOJ� MOCOS . �- 9EYR 1 iMA I• 1- 1- a. tesla--� • , Z' i • lI 'F a G a J W _ v.l ----n....�.[-. •lr yr.r�•/s.. a, ria. �......F--7-- 4 �f ril ILSr L16 W IY L,, 1 V S[[. . w u u,nYl Imm > ,o -x,' Id PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES ♦O + e j 1 O - x YI1. H o i t Yrnrlle. awn ss[.uvY 1. C •1•Aa.YeI.Y.Owu4- R � on.vm orzo. ` (ai Ill{ bl •:Inill(o a umnun �) aar Fl Bram rn .l .. e(e) :'I vti-A+•u•.741-C ava.a I Y •�•ly r .u'.:.. •■;Y I 1 iMA I• 1- r,. -----------s`.`— tesla--� PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES v EXHIBIT "A" CORPORATE CENTER ////DRIVE 1 __..B"B ur NI Hoa oP our auram auwuT m'nuu fro 1ofAL mbv m, TR N 11� Haman T" l � Palllnen Olam be � ....wed.._...._ PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES EAGAN WOOD GARDEN HOTEL It NIIY IY IIIIYItIIM fMI1Y I P{Y[ P[COPO PAVING A SITE DIMENSION PLA CIA Agenda Information Memo July 15, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Twelve FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for Overhill Farm 2nd Addition --we have received a request for final plat approval for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition, located east of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Enclosed on page Z5 is a copy of the proposed final plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of March 19, 1985, have been complied with. Also., all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • a�( OVERHILL FARM / •alTw L•[SECOND ADDITION / �D. W[1,1•LL I•I.1 M.Imrq � uYx3Y[ 891.90 fAL» ., Lau •[» � iv •Ur v xr»Yr w SM DWLRtXrp DOpp xoY no um •DY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT [L[rrwl. Ll>n ARE SHOWN THUS: II IL II I, v bQ A LS W 5 Ix W ua.CWl.i LMLT Yp S r[Ll .,,rAiX YO fOLMNN LW LKt IMI[SS OMIIXRL wdrliFD OtM M -..Ml. VuL" SURV"001L 1.1 wi z5 SEC.25,T-27,R-23 D•i1Li pLp IIII:�•.,Q,. K,A wVl f[W F 1111 TJ,O �.. ,MMMT. LAAP SCALEI I INCH 100 FEET fo » o Xw afo e o[•ol0 1N IKx er If acx wu wrL .D•uKn, Yi Yp YMYD eI KfI[iY19L YG Liel� ail9 NMA6[ 9f11.M M M1tiX 4!K DI M 11[mA IUi d-aI[IIWLL . WIMS} Yai1W'R ISLr/LD iD fFM xfY S%iT Yf14L eENWfe xK 11f4rIK MKA. 0 l j'um'i 11 I I 1 11 I 1 4 'J �1[II [ILIn ' � n • I I Y 1� I I• i' P,Mf[[ Ym•1 I s^ 2 •e 3 x• a. I1" •'�. 1 o I •,-_l IY* i.I1 :• Iq 14.'u.-9: 4 ga .fig I �� � II .[m-1 YI 3 8" I �' I1 Ym- 6 Ba $� I� MOD-• 7 I I �I Y.YI- a � I �1`i[ YW o �., `�•���ma I •s I� � 'i wP I1 NR 4 -]]@--Cw�__I n a Lau •[» � iv •Ur v xr»Yr w SM DWLRtXrp DOpp xoY no um •DY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT [L[rrwl. Ll>n ARE SHOWN THUS: II IL II I, v bQ A LS W 5 Ix W ua.CWl.i LMLT Yp S r[Ll .,,rAiX YO fOLMNN LW LKt IMI[SS OMIIXRL wdrliFD OtM M -..Ml. VuL" SURV"001L 1.1 wi z5 SEC.25,T-27,R-23 D•i1Li pLp IIII:�•.,Q,. K,A wVl f[W F 1111 TJ,O �.. ,MMMT. LAAP SCALEI I INCH 100 FEET fo » o Xw afo e o[•ol0 1N IKx er If acx wu wrL .D•uKn, Yi Yp YMYD eI KfI[iY19L YG Liel� ail9 NMA6[ 9f11.M M M1tiX 4!K DI M 11[mA IUi d-aI[IIWLL . WIMS} Yai1W'R ISLr/LD iD fFM xfY S%iT Yf14L eENWfe xK 11f4rIK MKA. 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, RAHN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION N. Final Plat Approval for Rahn Cliff 1st Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition located south of Cliff Road and west of I -35E. Enclosed on page 2 is a copy of the final plat. All conditions placed on the prel minary plat approval of October 2, 1984 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 26 RAHNCLIFF 1ST ADDITION —j•• ! T^ • ` ^::: :ai 3C ry ul wr N Ixm nolo^: 1"n ".c all.r.,. rrunn .r 1'• •••• • • •y :: • [; i^nrl x 11un.c.. r..wn lo. wort w unr.lnr. Y•� Y 1 ROADI "'•'r ,n Iw xr.......N.... .1. rtwnl. ••• Yw it on.u, iu1..r xlw.Yu. 1 �. �• CF 7-RA!'wRTOP. 'V. i - • r u. r. l.n a..N..1 Y �•" III, u II Ix �� iinn°.iii o.ou..Ym.+ n, Imnp 1 F'LA]Ji lR2 !T.".I. Y JI/=Jd1P/ n, L•:IJLIJ -may 'ie r✓•• ow V.Y - WUIY. a lellnry -� w w 1L4I2 IIYJYN'. )pop _ . /I (.` FlR• �..-j�\�� �= \ / � � I.iNni"1 Y.r�l�r•.1 Iw`.or4..r°,r r.lr Y Yr Ic IL- L � •s,.ry m./r' "qr � '.r 1 Ibn[r u r r. x.e N .I r p'ri' rr 1 �`6, Y u rxr 11 Yulr. 1; . I.rl..IoM r .uu 1�.1 rfb n.l a. I1 Lii Z Y.M. B L 0 C K a / I \t i� HN, ii,,it ii••M ..ii n„i...., m lu 11 .. 1.,11. I,r. n.. el YIJI ` L' (JI1 ^f V xr eS Ixlpl n. Y.'n n.ri, i.. 10• m1.. 11 '� ° 1 1�-- — \16- I •.I 4 _ aY iii.. wii iq�:`ilaiil. 1 - $- _ II`` {// Cj , t 1it.•x MT lu u:I- IRAHAI t'L"YPOURTq w••+.r `lq /'/ o -;'A .,u..: .a..xr.rsii`,.N. i .1i.1 n �n:i.�°It r.r.N. r4 pu• u nw . Ir Ub aw,[4 .1 '°- • OUTLOi D .. 4.nr IT' IT iix m I ml n.m Nrn... uir nu. 5 r \a. r :� .�q � .ii 1. In.a. r— I'll t.xtin. Yn.. nlna.r. q dp------. _ .r..1 rini nax: Inw Irli n / IM T117-11 107iw 1 N Irt Irl, r 11.1 er'. Ypr •\S .••`Ll x ui.11'� � � � L�Y 0. ,.,blIln, in .' 4 - \ i l� j �/ , •i' u.w Q Im 11.1 .I Ix OUTLOT A 1 4� - �, �I I` wnl. I,i ins ollnl cru. [..0 r � "7 liu•Iriiiir lii .min u.Yoe ice. n.rie Lu•• • I x.n .w ul1 "°"x. r�n louln.,[.. w1 �In �Y C Yaml. u.x un. m. wuli. IT' F..o.viu11 nJ Ib. YeluY ru uli.�iii �u li— r N "R_ ! i�. .� �`• s ml.[ .m.iii. PUT ui."�. miii, w p °.inr ` / ■)rF \ � !� r 11 Nnlx YI.Ir Wn11 Yr.r 6 `/O ♦. :i• t Ihnneli•.iY�nnlrlito li, GlC f Cr ilw. ..m ..-r. n1 ..r 'il nn rrwunr wamn�w .. n... In 0).0 1 •i1e-ilmw �) 1,1 L----• "`� i;` L �`t ..(, nnum m-ur : n wu. w..,.Yw aulwn[. Ir Iern..r .. 1, Y r ., Vrp.f ,,�' a`' I,i ..l.l In N 4i•N .N = L Aliil.nnyl Y�el' Wn11. i13 C YRAHNCLIFF IYLOURT� Fri/'� ty, �' [ice Ir: r.nw, Lu :i •• u 1 — C_ -- ��•�/ / I ` lrai it pxl-lull I 4.1rw,.. W.o wn ...x ;'—W... .... 4 I : —Yr T p 1 • .i. w.xu.1 (npinr • .n. Nrw i •• •OI axulr Vn w bn. In 4 ur Y _•_ w S� WTLOT B MxOr N nm r. .• rix bN rurlx. Y ul1 Nu a w.m.Tlsr ammw 7/ •/ \Y •Mr.xlq un Y.. rNL x 4x _YI Y n_ N. �L.9nw: ...Y.. . ,. .. - w.......n[ +�`r..� .. Y u_ —J� IYYYxw....wnlw A `1l _ i`I `i iiilxLl ... ..... ur�m "mmw. �I / l -I r111 In I.n .IN 114,xnEln'rjlll u III wrr. Y1.11 Wnu YLll.r •a P.•• CA. I: DDIVZ1 i l "m.n. _...�..�.4 � : . . .rlb.r �o .xnl nw..ial :°iiAii :uiinii........nMt - .� Tv'ur. ui rlu �1 u` um .1. ux wiiinn er li, Ui f)C �M//•)J'!YL )JOW .YMnI 1. Y u1Nx1 eIx Va., Y[r.l Lw.r�4w11 u.Y \b. lYi:A14111 • . {.1 \ l R.:r P: n;.-9 ":L Mrm•n,�~�� Ix..u. nn .11 uu xn x.I ITT. � It;:il_i 1, • Lr.. 1 • w bola t. r.un.n. l.N s,...pr un. anr.u. 4inu...r rl-• GTclr [.�� r i. sou OI nIM[[Ou It UMTES Ilw wN[n Ipap [N'r m x[nnu M ler.y�ry YmM'. br1111u1. .I. .Vel.. p.( r ew�n..mwr It NICITIS 1 1 11' Ixw Ylen w 41t r of le .1 It'll. A.S.IdryYr UT Alt. rWYY Lr lr x.nl. L. r. Irr a xlnw. 1 -L y. ja]N Yl.0 W..°. nlw •. ' LY. 11111 ut 1'n WI°i.. m/tl'.erl Ia/Caup [YnL 1, txnn - . IS All rx l.[ to nAt Pin xr M I, to .n bell.. xmnru [tar. xu.0 t. 1,.slopm..1 un-xo mva rYl[elxl., xrlru r.lr n.Iw JAMES R. HILL, INC. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 85-M, FINAL ACCEPTANCE O. Project '85-M, Final Acceptance (Wescott Hills 4th Addition - Storm Sewer --As a part of the development of the Wescott Hills 4th Addition, an existing trunk storm sewer line had to be re- located. This work has been completed with all final inspections being performed by a representative of the Public Works Department and our consulting engineering firm, with a recommendation for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85-M (Wescott Hills 4th Addition - Storm Sewer) and accept for perpetual ® maintenance. 40 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJECT 476, HIGHVIEW AVENUE - STREETS A. Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets -- In response to a petition received from several property owners who use Highview Avenue, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing bei g scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages Z O through is a copy of the feasibility for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the original petition submitted, requesting improve- ment of this ,section of roadway. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to those property owners who are proposed to be assessed under this project. This segment of Highview Avenue was originally proposed to be upgraded under Project 292 in 1980. At that time, the estimated rate per front foot was $21.00 with the final assessment rate being $19.24 per front _foot. The estimate contained in this report is very conservative based on the assumption that the majority of the existing gravel base will not be able to be salvaged due to the final subgrade evaluation along with the plan and __.__._.._profile design of the final street configuration. More detailed and accurate cost estimates can be obtained once detailed plans and specifications have been prepared and even moreso after formal bids have been received. The consulting engineer will be available to discuss this project during the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 476, Highview Avenue (Streets) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi- cations. 29 REPORT ON HIGHVIEW AVENUE • (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 660' WEST STREET IMPROVEMENTS --- - _-. - PROJECT No. 476 - ® EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49396 BoKcawa, Rade rs, f4mje,2j m a 4ddocla4&, Ync. 8t Pa"4 Ma m"a& 0 Bonestroo, Rosen 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 11, 1986 Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) Street Improvements Project No. 476 Our File No. 49396 Dear Mayor and Council: Our• G. Nunnuuu. P.E NuYrn W. A.c I4 E. J-,Ih C- And,,hk. Y.E. Nmd/wd A. Lenr rrY. Y. E. Nrrhdrd E. TYrnn. P.E. Junin C. Ubun. P.E. Glrnn N. C.R. Y E. Amh A. GwJun. Y.E. )hmnY, E. Nuyn. Y.E. Ri,nwd W. Pwur. P.E. Nuhn G. ] humrh, P.E. Marvin L Surmlu: P, E, Uunuld C. &,,ardl. P.E. J"' A, Nuurdun, P.L'. Murk A. H,.0 . P. E. lid K. hod, P.£. MrrAYd T. Numnrunn, P E. R.P,, N. PJ%/rrlr, /U. M,,d U. Lwhum. P L', rhunw W. K... P.E. hfuharlC L'n'A. Y.E. Aurin 1. Wdlu. PE. Jurnn R. Mulrnd. P.E. Arnnnh P. Andrnun. P.E. Kmh A. CYAnwnn, P.L. hlark N. Rgfs. P.£. Nuhn C. NuurE, A. 1.4 Thum., E. A.,... P, E. Sron A. YuYnY. P E. Chu,In A. EnN,mr Lm M. Yur+rhhy Nudun M. M.. • Swun M. Ebrlin Enclosed is our report for Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west), Project No. 476. This report covers street improvements and includes a pre— liminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the 'Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, 80NESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. l / � Mark A. Hanson Date: June 11, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 liApproved by: Department of Pu lic Works Date: •�r,=-L. r 5696d 30 Year 3 Anniversary SCOPE: This project provides for street Improvement for the unpaved portion of Highview Avenue from Pilot Knob Road to a point 660' to the west. The pro- posed improvements include upgrading Highview Avenue to a residential standard (concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving) for streets in the City of Eagan. Highview Avenue is abutted on both the north and south side by six (6) single-family, platted parcels. This portion of Highview Avenue also serves as a major access to the homes in the Valley View Plateau Additions. Traffic counts recently taken by the City of Eagan measured the average daily traffic ® (ADT) at the east end of Highview Avenue to be 499 ADT while at the west end 0 was 323 ADT. Although these traffic counts are well in excess of what should be encountered on a gravel road, they also indicate that 36% of the traffic is generated from the lots in the Highview Acres development. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering -- standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Highview Avenue between Pilot Knob Road and a point 660' to the west of Pilot Knob Road is an existing gravel road. Water main and sanitary sewer were constructed in this section of Highview Avenue in 1968 and 1970, respectively. In 1980 storm sewer was extended from an existing storm sewer in Pilot Knob Road to the low point in Highview Avenue which is located at the westerly end of the project proposed herein. As part of that same project, Highview Avenue was also upgraded with concrete curb and bituminous surfacing from the westerly end of this project to Highridge Terrace. 5696d Page 1. 3Y Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to upgrade Highview Ave- nue to a 32' wide butiminous street with concrete curb and gutter. It is assumed for purposes of this report the existing aggregate base is not of suf- ficient depth or cross section to be utilized in the upgrading of this street. It is also assumed common excavation will be required to construct the street to a proper elevation and cross section. Upon completing the required excava- tion a 6 inch thick Class 5 1006 crushed aggregate base will be constructed, in conjunction with bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, manhole adjustment, and driveway and boulevard restoration. However, as part of the preparation of the plans and specifications a more detailed analysis will be done to better evaluate if the existing aggregate base can be utilized. In addition, it may be less costly to construct a thicker bituminous base course resulting in less excavation and aggregate base construction depending on the final design cross section of the road. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment and Construction Area SE 1/4 Section 4 is Highview Acres Lot 1 Lot 2 (021-00) Lot 2 (022-00) Lot 7 (074-00) Lot 8 (081-00) Lot 8 (082-00) 5696d Page 2. 33 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $47,670 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30C and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs. The 10 assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the cost of street on a front foot basis to the abutting property it serves. Lot I and Lot 8 (081-00) were previously assessed for their entire frontage abutting Pilot Knob Road at the time Pilot Knob Road was upgraded in 1980. Therefore, as part of this project it is pro- posed that a 75 foot corner lot credit be applied to that frontage abutting ® Highview Avenue for Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00). REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Street $47,670 Street Assessment $47,670 $47,670 $47,670 -0- All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there are no funds required from the major street fund. Page 3. 5696d 3� PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 5696d Page 4. 35 June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 Fall, 1986 Spring, 1987 May, 1988 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HICHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' West) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 + 5% Contingencies $ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin & Bond Interest TOTAL...................................... Page 5. 5696d 3� $ 2,700 1,000 :1M 6,650 2,940 3,150 5,000 180 6,300 --- 3,000 1,200 2,000 $34,920 1,750 $36,670 11,000 $47,670 900 Cu. yds. Common excavation @ $3.00/cu, yd. 200 Cu. yds. Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu. yd. 100 Cu. yds. Select granular borrow @ $8.00/cu, yd. ® 950 Ton Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 210 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $14.00/ton 210 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $15.00/ton 25 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $200.00/ton 120 Cale. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1,50/gal, .1,260 Lin. ft. .,Surmountable concrete curb .& gutter @ $5.00/lin, ft 6 Each Driveway restoration @ $500.00/each 6 Each Adjust MH and CV box @ $200.00/each ® 1,000 Sq. yda. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq. yd. Total + 5% Contingencies $ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin & Bond Interest TOTAL...................................... Page 5. 5696d 3� $ 2,700 1,000 :1M 6,650 2,940 3,150 5,000 180 6,300 --- 3,000 1,200 2,000 $34,920 1,750 $36,670 11,000 $47,670 Parcel Description HIGHVIEW ACRES Lot 1 Lot 2 (021-00) Lot 2 (022-00) Lot 7 (074-00) Lot 8 (081-00) Lot 8 (082-00) APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL HIGHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 Assessable Total Footage Rete/F.F. Assessment 205 (1) $44.55 9,133 165 44.55 7,351 165 44.55 7,351 330 44.55 14,702 65 (1) 44.55 2,896 140 44.55 6,237 1,070 $47,670 (1) A 75' corner lot credit was applied 5696d Page 6. 37 • r 1 U EXISTING STREET PROPOSED STREETIMPROVEMENTS SURMOUNTA,qLE CONCRETE CURB 81 GUTTER 34 BACK TO BACK 2 (022-00) 7 -(074-00) 2 (021-00) END CONSTRUCTION BEGIN CONSTRUCTION I/XXXI/X�75' CORNER LOT CREDIT .............. ::•ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 0 loo 200' GroPhic Scale in Feet HIGHVIEW AVENUE (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 660' WEST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 476 EAGAN, MINNESOTA M O Z v cr 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I II I m O Z Y EXISTING STREET BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANIDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul,, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1988 Comm. 49398 FIG. No. 1 Pao3- 41-7& ,�,xL,,C�, April 8, 1986 Tom Colbert Eagan Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom, I'm writing to call your attention to the deplorable condition • of Highview Ave. in northern Eagan from Pilot Knob to approx- imately 600 feet west of Pilot Knob. As you may be aware, this section of Highview Ave. was left untouched in 1980 when the rest of the street was upgraded by installing curb, gutter, storm sewer and blacktop. In the spring this road becomes a quagmire of mud and potholes; summer brings almost unbearable dust as well as complaints to the Public Works Department requesting that something be done to settle the dust. These conditions contribute to extra— ordinarily high maintenance costs which are borne by all resi— dents of the city. This letter will serve as notice that a petition to upgrade this road is being circulated and will be brought to the Council for their thoughtful consideration and action within the next few weeks. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ed Martin 1474 Highview Ave. Eagan, MN 55121 Phone: 4544-419� 0 7zel— c,vvy '3� So Ed i/14SEC. 4,TI!79 R23 _ HIGHVIEW AVENUE PETITIONERS -.rel. •. •.:\'. v�. W: !': :':: ll'f: f':. lff:•: - . :;:r: 2 :{:}:{•Q{;; iiii}Iii}i: >' (•?<?I:-}r%[%:j f 020-O2 H/GH✓YerY tj A , 026-75 1 4Gy 91 E64on ARK 020-75 CITY al E94 eoyr.- [. 6 Pe9rr^�A. C c ago/yn [. Mary C.Sp�sYJ s � / P 9 z / G John 6 E✓ni CC I 9039 U9 T I OM NO. 033869 1 2Y F' 7 I e 13 iG HIGHVIEW ro 01094-0000 LlwrvnCC T d � v.3 Aifr iJ �'r� \�v.. it �•w'•�y :y. S�oi [ _ "JL r-tYtcJ!��_= !l 2 09�i e ,� ''' 6 ROADWAY IN QUESTION PETITIONERS Gr-Yt/IEW t ` y T 4 VK 7 'P.i:e>} :�>:�:,"•�,: � [o {:;{i :viii'%�r'r, J � .`. . ......: L •:•i:'r:::: BRIDGE.VIEW••• AVE. hi:: :;. -.rel. •. •.:\'. v�. W: !': :':: ll'f: f':. lff:•: - . :;:r: 2 :{:}:{•Q{;; iiii}Iii}i: >' (•?<?I:-}r%[%:j f 020-O2 H/GH✓YerY tj A , 026-75 1 4Gy 91 E64on ARK 020-75 CITY al E94 eoyr.- [. 6 Pe9rr^�A. C c ago/yn [. Mary C.Sp�sYJ s � / P 9 z / G John 6 E✓ni CC I 9039 U9 T I OM NO. 033869 1 2Y F' 7 I e 13 iG HIGHVIEW ro 01094-0000 LlwrvnCC T d � v.3 Aifr iJ �'r� \�v.. it �•w'•�y :y. S�oi [ _ "JL r-tYtcJ!��_= !l 2 09�i e ,� ''' 6 ROADWAY IN QUESTION PETITIONERS TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECLEV D il'I..a id u We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS i�74-6 C' /r3C c/ g2.Sr6 1ly75 �r. erlr� p'�yey X473 2ruCMG�' /�Cv vY�yj 111-7 _'_ rt l TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED MAN 1 IN"O' We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface.. NAME ADDRESS al.. -vie �_' Z" 6e � 1"e 4 4 f / A /� Ax 5` �t - 4 y�T Z, w % L/_5— % Vie' i / 5Ss Y,, RECEIVED P"�^,� 1 19' TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS Ui.Cty'F:iJ TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME p ADDRESS ys� -si -7 Z It 1� o T • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT, DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition --We have received a request from:. the Rosemount School District #196 to vacatethe existing watermain utility easement that is dedicated with the final plat for the above referenced subdivision. This easement is required to be vacated based on the final alignment of the watermain based on a sealed construction: A new easement has been described and conveyed to the City. As of this date., the staff has not received any object'to this proposed utility easement vacation. Enclosed on page is a -copy of the easements proposed to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and vacate the utility easement as described for the Deerwood School Addition. H -r--fN I ZA I F.X=r t:;:l N r, N V-4 %- DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION A, NW Co n•^ -; A, k of 7W17,fW23 73, NE Cor..., .f AI // w 11Y h'WV4f.rAe 56- 114 1 NW rid A S-S6.%/.f sm. 4 Twieoma. If5, W w sm 00 09 14: 33 7 /1 0— --- DAVE- 66hk C .. CrA C..—I;.. A— A.a,.s LOCATIDIV MAP all 0:40 Ilk k SEmON L 7-wp z7 pm 23 PIP, Fig c 34 P, 93 7 A, 6 to iwh a'.P)Iic S-10 fed. --- ------------ - 04,92 IINA, 'V.Aw'.l 1/1 r Ik' gdA,.d %I.F Sebg Twp 17'f4f Z3 01 USURMA94 7A, ..Al:..N4 Nk' %J/4, S.S. 1h 7-V?Z7A-4'F ZJ 9 645' A, W. ll.kf' AMP/. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen VACATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BLACKHAWK GLEN IST ADDITION C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and ,Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition --In response to a request received from the developer of the proposed Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the Council scheduled a public hearing to consider the vacation of certain portions .of an existing drainage and ponding easement to allow the development of residential roperty as a part of the 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page is a copy of the easements proposed to be vacated. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected parties with no objections received to date. The •Engineering Division has evaluated this request and determined that there would be no adverse impact to required storm water storage requirements. U ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the drainage easement. as described for Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition. �7 BLACKHAWK GLEN ®ST ADDITION EASEMENT SKETCH. �xwrxar>rxrxnw rrK nrw ar,ttn � 4 r^v N 89.37?9'W 2230.68 ` ianm arnnr x[w>rlr vw wu� " ;. 1 . •`s `- �°r. rr .us.aro nora ar eurJx... xnas srr°xo .°o•nanr ,ro,J ' � j:L,•o TZ�°.,.,ri--r—:–.•,�;�, Hyl Sy (oT �e ;,i 7.} w �� � to � urzxrxr rcaoxxn rrmf 7 ,Jro�, ��-\(/ tr P` 9 �`i ourLor �nr�;. =j"A.- ufwrxrL` , !r �b�• ::mt �y]-af: ,�•��' i xx me wa neje. r °'w,P• so min •.r•nn � >—nn.aufr runitxr I\ .b - N O u T L O T n.• iw Jmmox � � +� � �,•� 0 10 q0 .e . ourLor ' [T J .` � ' , , x "`k'. • C I i Y � � i - :.°- a —� i ,se. A .. N75.43.01 -E unmWni�3•la}/ - er•J�YK �'- !rv',_� 54900599:° �µii36 °"p^°" w 'rrye°xb9 F..,�.... +.y .��, //� Y �x•Tn..— �(� rzmxo w. �"ro ' �""w 2 ` (y,\ 8.1219 aaa rsitc'p ay ,I 8 +� / —moi Imo•a°°,.f.• N �l �� ,� I ,: , ,; ; � _— L� 1 n �,:'jl �, l• 3 :++/ L J \ \ \ ^nom _ ♦ 9 4� ag IL sa 1g4gv 7. DENOTES AREA OF EASEMENT TO BE V/ a4 VACATED AND NOT COVERED BY ;a• ...1 :...\\;9•�\Y; EASEMENT AFTER PLATTING. 1) 6"2 s is % sejj�w 62 rE•'fjf/ � � ���t _ 7 1 o:y 117 Y.\ \ as c°°••\ � _.. __ ri9L,5 6 /\ if 8 /�_so_� x"a _.b✓,!'^'v� 1 ppy"• 1050. <— w �s.r•fio: fdeJx\J R asrfBugr .nr .'K 3;86w'0� inc m .D.J..,• �( .1l 1.52o+�sica`° 1r�"°oe�aJo `°oar .o .+fid j/�3 �'s. - � J,t•(t�_i• ao —..nor\ \':°'-: �•Y 64 1 O` "irt ox \"'.f e e "t'n q' / eo• °•1 ;s •t,' /r B�rF r \,. O'1i.Y r fe•� Ff�orqma wt.v�� alo Z. '3. ? /, °rY{� � > 117 •., "py +\� t / .�1 p♦ /� • O.5(c rri _ �` \ /s • / CI :1lro Is.. •\ \=`.• n,r. `•. :x'°•ia.m.nr— \�'': m. :.'u':...'....e're P.�.//,�eee/r fY� _ .•ora m _�t (-� a_ - _•= �' —�\`:. • d.- I _ . ICj, ..°t '1O y •' ,/ • . +4/�M1 L`I Ix I'.'wr. =,m� ' A-L'.r26', > •6.,..,,/...z 7f..lY'.1 i. i_ ,i !. i� i. n rx, i/\9':'`v \`r '/� '• ' r. . \-•'•tej v,i.�:SY:3 �n.m.a r�fi'1E:R. �I la 3J rcr81 y 16427 ;I Ig 2P Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen PROJECT 450, WILLIAMS & LARUE ADDITION - SANITARY SEWER D. Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer --On December 3, 1985, a public hearing was held to discuss the installation of sanitary sewer laterals to service the Williams and LaRue 1st and proposed 2nd Additions. As a result of that public hearing, wherein a preliminary assessment roll was prepared based on estimated cost, Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of plans and subsequent advertisement for bids. As a, result of the bid opening held on June 27, it was determined 40 that the cost to construct the sanitary sewer lateral, services and related restoration exceeded the estimate discussed at the public hearing-. In accordance with Council. policy, consideration of the award of the contract was continued until the affected property owners could be informed of the projected increased assessments and provided an opportunity to reevaluate the needs for the proposed improvement. Enclosed on page '!�D is a copy of a letter sent out by our consultant engineer informing the people of this projected cost overrun and scheduling a meeting to be held on Thursday, July Lo, to explain the information in further detail with final Council consideration on July 15. It is anticipated that the major discussion of the presentation of this item would pertain to the estimated cost and proposed alternates, rather than the entire project concept. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 450, Williams and LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer. 11 U SPECIAL NOTE The letter from the Consulting Engineer to residents informing them of the cost overrun was not available for distribution with Friday's packet. It will be included with Additional Informa- tion on Monday, July 14. so Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen PROJECT 473, PILOT KNOB ROAD - TRUNK STORM SEWER E. Public Hearing for Projcet 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer --With the proposed improvement and upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to south of Cliff Road, additional trunk storm sewer facilities will be required to handle the runoff generated from this improvement,. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing beir}g scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. • There are three distinct separate areas where trunk storm sewer will be installed or existing lateral storm sewer revised. With many property owners already being assessed for trunk area storm sewer, no additional assessments would be proposed except for those who have not previously paid their trunk area storm sewer assessment. However, if they were proposed to be affected by either the necessary acquisition of construction easements or inconveniencedby construction activity, the letter enclosed on page 61 was sent out also notifying them of this public hearing. A so, all notices were published in the legal newspaper -.- ... and sent to those property owners proposed to be assessed, inform- ing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer will provide detailed information pertaining to these proposed improvements and will be available to answer questions and concerns from the Council and public. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer, and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. REPORT .m PIL®T ISN®R ROAD ® (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY MALL) r, TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT N®. 473 EAGAN, MINNES®TA FILE No. 49380 /1 Baned.4waf 2odeae, f4ada-idda 9 AdociaACA, 9aa St /dors/, Mtn«eeota ' — Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 2, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Pilot Knob Road (Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park, City Hall) Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 473 Our File No. 49380 Dear Mayor and Council: Ort. G. B.nnlroo. P.E. Ruben W. Rosen Y.E. Jcoryh C. Andr hk, P.E. bra✓/ rd A. Lrn,be,,, P.E. Richard E. Turn". P.E. J.mek C. Olson. P.E. ORnn R. Cook. P.E Aeilh A. G.rdon. P.E. Th.,. E. Noyn, P.E. Rlrhurd W. Fal", P.E. Rohrer G, Sch.ruhl, P.E. Marvin L.-Surrulu, P.E. Donald C. B.,,n,dl, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Murk A. H"uon, P.E. Ted X. Pidd, P.E. Michael T. Nuwmonn. P.E. Ruben R. Y/e/Jrrlr, Jl L'. Dund O. LwAalu. P.E. Thumal W. Pnrrsun. Y.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. K1Bh. P.E. Jams R. Muland; P.E. A'ennelh P. Anderson, PE. Kroh A. Bachmann, P.E. Murk R. Rol/+. P.E. Ruben C R.uek. A.I.A. Thmnua E. AnMur. P.E. .Aur, L. Y.un,. P.E Churls A. Leo Aeon Leo M. P.wh ky Harlan M. Oh.n Sums M. Eberhn Transmitted herewith is our report for Pilot Knob Road Trunk Storm Sewer Im- provements, Project No. 473. This report coveres trunk storm sewer and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00 RO ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. _AG�L_'__ Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of t=SteMinnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: June 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by lYepartment of Public Works Date: 4 - V -dc 6 5456d �3 30 Year Anniversary i 1 LJ SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer im- provements which are required at this time due to the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Cliff Road in 1987. The trunk storm sewer im- provements are located in 3 different areas along Pilot Knob Road and are in- cluded within or adjacent to Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park and City Hall. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and only slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The revision proposes that the NWL for Pond BP -15 southwest of Evergreen Park be lowered 6.4 ft. to 892.6 as compared to 899.0 as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This revision to the Master Plan is recommended for two reasons: 1. The low point of Sequoia Lane in Evergreen Park Addition can then be drained southwesterly into Pond BP -15 thus providing additional capacity within the existing 27" RCP located east of Pilot Knob Road through which this area presently drains. Based on design standards utilized today the existing 27" RCP is approximately 30% under design capacity for a 5 year storm based on its present drainage area. Therefore, redirecting the low point of Sequoia ® Lane to Pond BP -15 will provide additional capacity for the future storm sewer required in Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the con- struction of this line will provide better street drainage at the intersections of Sequoia Lane and Walfrid Street and Sequoia Lane and Lodgepole Drive where additional catch basins are proposed. Also redirecting this drainage area to Pond BP -15 will allow it to flow by gravity to the Minnesota River rather than through the Carlson Lake lift station where it would have to be pumped to Thomas Lake resulting in additional long term energy costs. Page 1. 5456d :J�x 2. The existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive presently discharges into Pond BP -16. However, the controlled elevation of Pond BP -16 is approximately 3' higher than the existing storm sewer in Lodge - pole Drive. Therefore, by constructing the outlet for Pond BP -15 at a lower elevation and through the existing storm sewer from Lodgepole Drive, this storm sewer can ultimately be drained dry, resulting in less maintenance in the future. In addition, the de- sired normal water elevation of Pond BP -16 can be preserved as previously intended. L J It is recommended the project proposed herein be constructed as part of one contract. DISCUSSION: The project for discussion purposes is separated into 3 different areas. Evergreen Park: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing storm sewer within Evergreen Park Addition from the low point in Sequoia Drive southerly along Sequoia Drive and then westerly along Lodgepole Drive to Pond BP -15. It is also proposed to provide additional catch basins in the intersections of Sequoia Drive within Walfrid Street and Lodgepole Drive as shown on the at- tached drawing. In addition, it is proposed to construct a 12" diameter grav- ity storm sewer outlet from Pond BP -15 to an existing 21" RCP, which serves as the outlet for Pond BP -16 and conveys runoff from the Thomas Lake Elementary School site. The connection to the existing 21" RCP storm sewer will be at a location to provide sufficient grade and capacity to serve as the outlet for Pond BP -15. The 12" diameter storm sewer will also connect to the existing 27" RCP from Lodgepole Drive which presently discharges into Pond BP -16. This connection will allow the existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive to drain dry Page 2. 5456d 6�5' and also preserve the existing water elevation of Pond BP -16. Design consid- eration for Pond BP -15 are as follows: Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro- Comp. Proposal Comp, Proposed Plan posed Plan posed Plan Storage Plan Out -Outflow NWL NWL NWL HWL Storage (Ac.Ft.) flow cfs (cfs) Berry Patch Pond BP -15 899.0 892.6 901.6 894.7 3.0 2.4 1.0 0.5 Berry Patch Park: Storm sewer proposed for Berry Patch Park provides for con- structing a 12" diameter gravity storm sewer outlet from Mooney Lake (Pond JP -7) to Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9. Both Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -9 are included within Patrick Eagan Park. Pond JP -7 is abutted by residential homes to the south and east included in Hilltop Estates while to the north and west it is abutted by large unplatted parcels. However, the unplatted parcels • west of Pond JP -7 which also abut Pilot Knob Road are presently proposed to be developed. Therefore, as part of their development plans, they will also be required to interconnect Pond JP -36 to Pond JP -35 and Pond JP -35 to Pond JP -7. Pond JP -36 which abuts Pilot Knob Road will receive additional runoff as part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive. The lateral storm sewer proposed in Pilot Knob Road will be extended northerly and south- erly from Pond JP -36 and ultimately discharge to Pond JP -36. Therefore, due to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the proposed development of the unplatted • parcels west of Pond JP -7 and the current high water elevation flooding park property and trailways, it is necessary to provide an outlet for Pond JP -7 at this time. Design considerations for Pond JP -7 are as follows: Comp. Plan Existing 5 Proposed Elevation NWL Pond JP -7 862.8 859.4 Comp, Plan Comp. Plan & Proposed S Proposed Proposed HVL Storage Outflow 865.2 47.6 ac.ft. 1.0 City Hall: Storm sewer proposed at Eagan City Hall includes constructing a storm sewer from the northwesterly corner of Pond JP -6 within an existing open Page 3. 5456d rA ]w+� :-�F �. .., _-. 1 -,--co :,,xa fr .. .iT.: yrx. �e R.,.I'> -.; s.av v i• .; z�se-n"' :�=2+?J A.?i�`7�i 's.''`-� ditch towards City Hall as shown on the attached drawing. Presently, runoff from Pilot Knob Road and a portion of the parking lot at City Hall is conveyed through this open ditch to Pond JP -6. However, those portions of the ditch which are at a steep grade are beginning to suffer severe erosion. Therefore, due to the additional runoff being directed towards this ditch resulting from the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary to construct storm sewer in those portions of the ditch which are susceptible to erosion. However, be- cause of the uncertainty of how the property south of .City Hall will develop, it is proposed to preserve the open ditch where it is constructed at flatter grade and erosion is less a concern. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for construction of the storm sewer for • Hilltop Park and Evergreen Park. Storm sewer for City Hall is constructed on property owned by the City. Therefore, no easements are required. Parcel Description - - - -- EVERGREEN PARK . .... . ..... .._ Thomas Lake School Addition Lot 1, Block 1 Thomas Lake Lot 7, Block 1 Lot 8, Block 1 BERRY PATCH PARK Hilltop Estates Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 5456d " Permanent Temporary Easement Easement 0.18 acre 0.37 acre 0.06 acre 0.13 acre 0.07 acre 0.13 acre Page 4. 6, 0.04 acre 0.03 acre 0.03 acre 0.06 acre 0.05 acre 0.16 acre 0.11 acre 0.11 acre 0.22 acre 0.18 acre AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 010-51 Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-53 Parcel 012-54 ® Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 ® SE 1/4.6 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-26 City of Eagan Parcel 013-26 City of Eagan SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan HILLTOP ESTATES Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 1 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-85 City of Eagan Parcel 010-82 City of Eagan NE 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan THOMAS LAKE SCHOOL ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDN. Lot 7, 8, Block 1 EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 6 28, Blk. 1 Lots 3, 4 & 5, Block 4 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 S 22, Blk. 5 Lots 1 (012), 2, 7, 8 6 9, Block 6 Page 5. 5456d I COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is listed below: Evergreen Park $162,020 Hilltop Park 68,250 City Hall 39,810 $270,080 The total estimated project cost is $270,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess- ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef- fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as- sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of • this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. Page 6. 5456d 6y TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Large Lot $0.50/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft. of ea. ac.) Regional Park $0.025/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance is Trunk Storm Sewer $270,080 Trunk Area Assessments $214,402 TOTAL $270,080 $214,402 -$55,678 It is anticipated -$55,678 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund. It should be noted, however, that $92,355 of revenue is related to the proposed assessment to Patrick Eagan Park and Berry Patch Park which is con- ._.. ... ..-. .. - .... ...... _.------ sidered the City of Eagan. 2 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Acquire Easements Approve Plans and Specifications Receive Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 7. 5456d Wo June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 Summer, 1986 August, 1986 Sept., 1986 Sept., 1986 Spring, 1986 Summer, 1987 May, 1988 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 473 A. EVERGREEN PARK 600 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. $ 21,600 250 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 8,000 250 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,000 1,380 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 33,120 11 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 12,100 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 4,800 1 Each 27" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 600 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 2 Each Connect RCP to existing RCP @$ $600.00/each 1,200 30 Lin.ft. Water main relocation @ $20.00/lin.ft. 600 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 15,000 550 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton 2,750 60 Lin.ft. Concrete curb and gutter @ $12.00/lin.ft. 720 6,000 Sq.yds. Boulevard sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 9,000 0.5 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 400 5456d Total $118,690 +5% Contingencies 5,940 $124,630 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 37,390 TOTAL EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION ..................... $162,020 Page 8. 41 B. BERRY PATCH PARK (Pond JP -7 to Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9) 1,350 Lin. ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in p1. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 37,800 2 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/lin.ft. 2,200 4 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/cstg. @ $500.00/each 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. 4,000 16 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 1,600 3.0 Acres Seeding @ $800.00/acre 2,400 RCP Flared end w/trash Total 800 $ 50,000 +5% Contingencies 2,500 $ 52,500 ® +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 15,750 TOTAL HILLTOP PARK ................................ $ 68,250 C. CITY HALL 150 Lin. ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 4,200 150 Lin.f[. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 3,900 540 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 12,960 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 3,300 ® 1 Each 24" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 1 Each 21" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $700.00/each 700 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 600 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 900 2.0 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 1,600 Total $ 29,160 +5Y. Contingencies 1,460 $ 30,620 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 9,190 TOTAL CITY HALL ................................... $ 39,810 Page 9. 5456d 47/ APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, HILLTOP PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROSECT NO. 473 Parcel Assessable Area Description (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) SW 1/4, SECTION 22 0.05/s.f. Parcel 014-50 183,990 Parcel 010-51 42,790 Parcel 020-51 217,800 Parcel 040-51 163,360 Parcel 050-51 217,800 Parcel 060-51 161,500 Parcel 010-52 621,335 Parcel 010-53 217,800 Parcel 012-54 110,100 Parcel 014-54 202,620 "'Parcel '015=54""''"' 209,570 Parcel 016-54 209,570 Parcel 010-00 336,000 (Berry Patch Park) SE 1/4. SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 Credit Assessable 331,060 Total (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment 0.05/s.f. Large Lot 75,750 $0.05/s.f. $ 3,788 Large Lot 16,500 0.05/s.f. 825 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Large Lot 49,500 0.05/s.f. 2,475 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Pond (152,750) 8,750 0.05/s.f. 438 Pond ( 40,100) 581,235 0.05/s.f. 29,062 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 --- 110,100 0.05/s.f. 5,505 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Large Lot 66,000 -0.05/s.f. 3,300__ Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Pond (236,000) 100,000 0.05/s.f. 5,000 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 $0.05/s.f. $ 16,552 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 0.05/s.f. 16,552 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 449,380 Future R/W (202) 359,500 0.05/s.f. 17,975 TOTAL........................................ $122,047 SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,340 3,494,200 Regional Park Page 10. 5456d W $0.025 $ 87,355 PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARCEL NO. SE 1/4, SECTION 22 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 010~79 Parcel OlO~Ul Parcel 010~82 Parcel 010-83 Parcel 012-85 5456d Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012`04 PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA �s BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date:JUNE, 1986 Comm. 49380 FIG. No. I S 0 500 GmDnitScole in Feet ® * = CITY OF EAGAN POND J -9 NWL= 816.7 HWL=83 .0 PROPOSED 12° DID -82 STORM SEWER 010-83■ 011-85, NWL= 819.2 HWL=830.0 012-85w PROPOSED 12° 011-86 STORM SEWER /—Ex. STORM SEWER 016-54 I� W 2 015-54 1 3 Q 4 I I \\ � 014-54 D /BERRY \\� O 1 040-51 PATCH 3 1 % PARK ft ///)I POND JP -7 060-51 010-00* W I NWL=859.4 / LAJ (MOONEY j HWL=865.2 LAKE) 050-51 010-51 FUTURE STORM SEWER 020-51 ! 010-53 014-50 FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) 11 (Co. Rd. No. 31) ILI or ' y1 t I ® POND JP -35 010-52 , POND JP -36 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK h ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE. 1986 FIG. N0. 2 Comm. 49380 010-84 d Z C 012-66 0 U PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (HILLTOP PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA WESCOTI ROAD 4 -------------------- 1 EXISTING STORM SEWER CITY HALL ffi EXISTING PAVEMENT 0 °• p 014-26 ° * EXISTING OPEN DITCH U v FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) PROPOSED STORM SEWER N 0CITY OF EAGAN N 013-26 CITY OF EAGAN Z 012-26 PONS Y i8•. NWL= 818.9 HWL= 830.0 F-24. o® ° J °gpg11C SCALE IN FEET �l a ROCKY WAY 3 I 2 SKOVDALE No. PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (CITY HALL) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 67 � E] 5 BONES ROOT , ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul=No Minn. Date:dUNE, 1986 Comm. 49380 LEXINGTON AVE PATRICK EAGAN PARK x o' Sao r�- L.Ph [ I..W N Fw • CITY V LKAN LEXINGTON WAYI I (Co. Rd. No. 31) —11 ®r n� PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN. MINNESOTA Xe BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date:JUNE, 768 Comm. 49380 FIG. No. q 11 IIAI 2oFeagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mures PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Courcy Memiwm THOMAS HEDGES July 3, 1986 city AtlMM Olw EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City cieh Re: Project 473, Pilot Knob Road Upgrading/Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements — Evergreen Park & Berry Patch Park Dear Property Owner: This letter is to inform you that on July 15 at 7:00 P.M., a public hearing will be held at the Eagan City Hall to discuss the proposed project providing for storm sewer construction, installation and modifications necessary to handle storm water runoff associated with the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road in 1987. While the City does not propose assessing you for any costs associated with this project, the Council would like to hear any of your comments -..----or concerns 'since you are located within the proposed construction area and may be affected by temporary construction easements and/ or inconvenienced by construction activity. Enclosed you will find a sketch plan showing the concept plan of construction that will be discussed at this public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the proposed alignments, location, scheduling, etc., please try to have a representative attend the meeting of July 15, ,1986 when all these items will be discussed in detail. Sincerely, Public Works Department TAC/dk Enclosures q THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES F. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the June 17 City Council meeting, specific direction was given to the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses that are issued in other communities that do not restrict the number of off -sale liquor licenses issued. The City Clerk's office was asked to prepare a response to the City Council direction For a copy of the directive and response, refer to pages_ through • Also enclosed on pages 7-4 throughare letters from two (2) residents addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding their position on changing the off -sale liquor license ordinance. There are two (2) alternatives being given consideration by the City Council for the regulation of off -sale liquor licenses. The first alternative is to limit the number of of'f-sale liquor licenses at five (5) and further that those licenses would be issued at the discretion of the City Council within established geographic boundary guidelines. The number of off -sale liquor licenses could only be changed in the future by ordinance amendment. The second alternative is to eliminate the number of off -sale liquor licenses within the City. If this alternate is given consideration, the City Council has discretion to attach certain regulatory guidelines. The City Council could adopt one or several of the following guidelines: 1) specific geographic • boundaries, 2) each community shopping center and/or sub -regional center will be allowed on off -sale liquor license, 3) a distance factor such as one-half or one mile between off -sale liquor store establishments, 4) so many licenses per population (our current population is approximately 35,500). With five (5) licenses, the ratio is one (1) license per 7,O00 people. 5) a per license ratio based on household units (our current number of household units is 12,500. The current ratio based on five licenses is one license per 2,500 households. Mr. Dave Perrier asked that research he has compiled be submitted fo- review by the City Council. Enclosed on pages f% through ilrLis a copy of Mr. Perrier's information. �7— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To 1) amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance by removing the limit of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted in the City and, further, consider certain regulations if the cap is lifted, or 2) decide to not amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance and keep the off -sale liquor license number at five (5). '76 MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE VANOVERBEKE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE. JUNE 29, 1986 SUBJECT: OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE STUDY At the June 17 City Council meeting, any further consideration to remove the ceiling or cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses available for issuance was continued until the July 15 City Council meeting. The purpose for continuing this item was to allow the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses if the caps are removed. Please arrange to have a study compiled that would address the following issues: ® 1. What are the restrictions enforced in other cities if there is no cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that are issued? 2. Are there control factors such as distance from schools or churches? 3. Provide any demographic information that might be helpful for the review of off -sale liquor licenses. Information was recently compiled by Federal Land Company that might be helpful as you prepare this study. In addition to the aforementioned questions, I would like you to ask for copies of city ordinances and review with city clerks the limit of control - enforced by a city council if caps are removed on the number of off -sale liquor licenses. 0 r. $ City AdministratoV TLH/kf 71 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBERE FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT DATE:JULY 7, 1986 SUBJ:OFF SALE: LIQUOR LICENSES Staff has reviewed off -sale liquor licensing practices in other metro area communities, the state licensing law and demographic information pertinent to off -sale licensing. Findings of that review are as follows: , I. Restrictions in other cities. A.Eight suburban communities which have not set number limits on off -sale licenses were contacted. 1. Bloomington (81,831 pop. (1980) has 25 active licenses and sets no restrictions other than zoning. The liquor stores must be located in commercial areas. The City Clerknoted that many liquor stores are located on Lyndale Ave. and that several of these had been in business for many years. 2. Burnsville (35,674) has eight active licenses. Their City Code states that the liquor store must be in a free standing building and cannot be located within one mile of one another. 3. Golden Valley (22,775) has had eight active licenses for several years. The City does not allow an off -sale business in an on -sale - - operation, but it is okay to locate in a strip shopping mall. - 4. Inver Grove Heights( 17,171) has seven off -sale establishments and there are no specific requirements. There are several stores along Concord.Street, some directly across from one another, that have been co -existing for years. 5. Maple Grove (20,525) has four active off -sale liquor stores, all operating in shopping mall locations. There have been no complaints about the system as it currently operates, but Maple Grove does plan to review their entire liquor ordinance in the near future. (Maple Grove's population is now 30,000, which closely patterns Eagan's growth.) 6. Plymouth (31,615) has eleven licenses which the clerk felt was a reasonable number for the approximately 40,000 residents.(1986 est.) The only restriction is there be no liquor store within 300' of any school, church or residential zone. 7. St. Louis Park (42,931) has nine licenses with no restrictions on locations other than zoning. The council may caution against lo- cating near another liquor store as not being prudent, but there is no law against doing so. 8. Shoreview (17,300) has four licenses. The population has since increased to 22,000 but there have been no requests for additional licenses. B. The people responsible for licensing in the eight communities generally agreed that_the market essentially sets the number of licenses. These_ cities have had few requests beyond the number of licenses already active. It is within the Council's perogative to request that the applicant undertake a market .study in order, to gauge the proposed liquor store's chances for success. II. Control factors. State statute MS340.413 does not allow a liquor store within 300' of a school or a church. There are no state restrictions regarding the number of licenses per population as is the case with on -sale licenses. ® III. Demographics A. Zones where off -sale liquor is allowed is shown on the attached map. Off -sale is a permitted use in retail shopping centers of Neighborhood Business (NB), Community Shopping Center (CSC) and . Regional Shopping Center (RSC) districts. It is a conditional use in a General Business (GB) District. There are P.O.D.s with underlying zoning which allow off -sale liquor. Actual development is not in keeping with the underlying zoning de- - - -- -- --creasing the possibility that a retail shopping center will be constructed. B.The revised Geographic Boundaries for off -sale licenses which were approved July 16, 1985, are also shown. The Council approved_ two licenses in the southwest area, one in.the southeast and one in the • north. The Council approved an additional license for the north central area on May 6, 1986. C.Approved sites for off -sale liquor stores are indicated by stars. �3 ►a Geographic boundaries approved • i July 2, 1986 Holly Sperr 4448 Johnny Cake Ridge Rd..., Eagan, MN 55122 Mayor Bea Blomquist Members of the City Council City of Eagan, Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and Council Members: ® I would like to go on record as changing of the off -sale liquor City of Eagan. being strongly opposed to the licensing ordinances within the I do not want the City of Eagan to look like, for instance, Lyndale Avenue in Bloomington where there is off -sale liquor establishment upon off -sale liquor establishment. For this governing body to say they will regulate,even with unlimited numbers available for purchase,is opening up the City for lawsuits should there be denial of the license request. - - -I was employed by the City of St. Paul Licensing Division for 7 years. I speak from experience when I relate the following. To stipulate in this proposed ordinance the restrictions such as churches, schools, residential areas, etc., is not sufficient, you are "opening up a can of worms". Lawsuits will cost money to us taxpayers. Zoning laws can be changed and that will serve as a potential problem. . My main concern with this ordinance, again speaking from experience, is that you will -be cutting the throats of the small business people that currently hold these licenses. It is a very�'difficult business to be in and by adopting this proposed ordinance you are going to make in almost impossible for the small business person to operate in our City. Please do not do that - they have cared enough to open up establishments and to run them as best they can and do not need chain liquor stores that can afford to run them out of business and then make their profit. Our City should care about the small business person and not do this to them - or to us, the taxpayers. Sincerely, Holly perr Please submit this letter as part of the record at the Council Meeting/Hearing to be held on July 16, 1986. Thank you. 7!� Easter Lutheran Church James P. Borgschatz, Pastor Thomas H. Johnson, Pastor July 1, 1986 City Council of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Council Members: 4200 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 (612)452-5200 I recently read about the discussions concerning liquor licenses in Eagan. I oppose the "free market" approach to granting liquor licenses because it is not responsible and will predictably lead to instability in the community with stores starting and then going out of business. It will also lead to greater financial pressures on the smaller stores which will -result in the greater access of liquor to minors. I am not opposed to liquor stores. And I agree that the current system is cumbersome and time-consuming as Mr. Smith indicated. I urge the Council to adopt an ordinance plan for the number of liquor stores that is tied to the population (perhaps to numbers of households) To reduce the unfair aspects of the "free market" approach, a minimum distance between stores could also be pursued. Several persons in this congregation have similarly expressed their views. Government need not abandon responsibility and good planning in order to satisfy the principles of the "free market." Government is also charged with the responsibility of seeking the "greatest good for the greatest number." And thank you for your many hours of public service in making Eagan not just a good place to live, but an exceptionally good place to live. Sincerely, James P. Borgschatz s� JPB/kkp 74 E 1 U • Highlighted in yellow is a supplement to Federal Land's "Off Sale License Information" that they have submitted. Please note there are restrictions to many of these City's liquor policies that have not been included in this information. Such as distance restriction between stores like Burnsville, Arden Hills, Minneapolis. Also, population regulations in some cities such as Cottage Grove, St. Paul and Minneapolis. There are some cities who have both of these restrictions, like Minneapolis. We • for the omitted how'many have also filled in the column ':'No. of Persons Per License" Municipal stores. This information should not have been because the stores are city owned. This still tells us stores are serving a particular area -for comparison. In calling and talking with many of these "No Limit" communities, many of the City's employees have stated that eventhough their policy reads "No Limit", every potential license must go in front or the City Council for an approval or disapproval, "becoming a timely and costly procedure!' Addressing concerns regarding "Constitutional Rights of the ._... _ Free Enterprise System", The liquor Industry cannot be compared to other retail stores. This industry has many more controls and restrictions placed on them by the Federal, State and Local Governments. No other retail business in taxed as high (8.57) an now a proposed hike of 7% by the end of the year, no other industry • is required to pay all there distributors in 30 days or be shutdown from any wholesaler being able to sell to them. No other business carries the added responsbility to the community not to,.sell to teenagers and intoxicated individuals that drive our streets. We do need a policy in Eagan, but not one that opens up the industry for anyone to come in and sell. The communities that have this policy put it in force many years ago when the industry had little regulations and there was not nearly the emphasis on liquor control. We need a policy with a one—mile minimum distance requirement and also based on population. This would allow the City to expand the number of off—sale liquor stores in the community as the population grows, while insuring a controlled liquor environment. Dave and Pat Perrier I OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION C� CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818. Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt, must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No other stores, schools & churches) Limit 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (Also,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire .16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley .22,775 No Limit 8 2,847 Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 •_ Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 (Council reserve the right to No Limit 2 approve or disapprove, only 2,648 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people P 54 6,86 9( Also,'i mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one 3,323 licenses for the City.has been approved, restriction.) ; No Limit 3 1,108 Oakdale --- =:;:12,123-- No Limit" 3 4,041 Plymouth 31,615 No Limit 11 2,874 Richfield 37,851 Municipal Only ..3- 12,617 Robbinsdale -14,422 Municipal Only 1' 14,422 • St. Louis Pk. ..L- 42,931 No Limit 9 4,770 St. Paul, 270,230. 1/5,000 people 58 4,659 Shoreview .. 17,300 No Limit Stillwater 12,290 No Limit (Citi Council approval necessary) W. St. Pau18,527 8 6 0 1 2,883 0 12,290 8 2,316 Woodbury , ,- . ,,1;10,397 1 , No Limit - 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figures are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED +BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND CITY LISTED ABOVE. COMPANY BY CONTACTING EACH OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818_- Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt, must comply Bloomington with a one 81,831 mile restriction from No other stores, schools & churches) Limit 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (A1so,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire. J6,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley 22,775 No Limit a 2,847 • Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 No Limit 2 2,648 (Council reserve the right to approve or disapprove, only 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people 54 6 , 8 6 9(Also, '2 mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one licenses for the City -has been approved, restriction.) 3,323 No r� Limit 3 1,108 Oakdale 12,123- No Limit 3 4,041 Plymouth 31,615 No Limit 11 2,874 Richfield , 37,851 Municipal Only 3 .12,617 �obbinsdale ....14,422 - Municipal Only .1 14,422 . St. Louis Pk. -, 42,931 No Limit 9 4,770 St. Paul 270,230, 1/5,000 people 58. 4,659 Shoreview 17,300 No Limit 6 2,883 Stillwater 12,290 No Limit 0 1 0 12,290 (City Council W. St. Paul a roval 18,5p2p7 necessary) 8 8 2,316 . Woodbury .. .,;10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council *Population figures Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND COMPANY BY CONTACTING EACH CITY LISTED ABOVE. I OFF SALELIQUORLICENSE INFORMATION C� CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS Robbinsdale 14,422 St. Louis Pk. 42,931 PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818, Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt, must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No Limit other stores, schools & churches) 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (Also, a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire -16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley 22,775 No Limit 8 . 2,847 Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 • Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 (Council reserve the right to No Limit 2 approve or disapprove, only 2,648 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people .54-: 6,869(Also,z mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one 3,323 licenses for the City -has No been approved. restriction.) Limit - 3 1,108 Oakdale ---- -. :.::,12,123 - No Limit" 3 4,041 Plymouth .. 31,615 Richfield 37,851 Robbinsdale 14,422 St. Louis Pk. 42,931 St. Paul 270,230: No Limit Municipal Only Municipal Only No Limit , 1/5,000 people Shoreview 17,300 No Limit Stillwater 12,290 No Limit (Cit Council approval necessary) W. St. Paul 18,527 8 2,874 3 .12,617 14,422 • 9 4,770 58 4,659 6 2,883 0 1 0 12,290 8 2,316 Woodbury _10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figures are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND:COMPANY,BY.CONTACTING EACH CITY LISTED ABOVE. r OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818_. Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt,'must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No Limit other stores, schools & churches) 6,869(Also,-."y mile Mendota Heights - Only 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population 3 (A1so,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire -16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley 22,775 No Limit 8 2,847 • Hopkins 15,336 Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 12 8 1,917 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo (Council reserve 5,296 the right No Limit to approve or disapprove, 2 only 2,648 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people 54.: 6,869(Also,-."y mile Mendota Heights - Only one licenses for the City has been approved, restriction.) Newport 3,323 No Limit - 3 1,108 Oakdale -'012,123 -- _ No Limit Plymouth - 31,615 No Limit' Richfield .. 37,851 Municipal Only 4wobbinsdale 14,422 Municipal Only St. Louis Pk. ., 42,931 No Limit St. Paul ....270;230 1/5,000 people Shoreview 17,300 No Limit Stillwater 12,290 No Limit (Cit Council approval W. St. Paul 18,527 necessary) 8 3 4,041 11 2,874 3 12,617 14,422 9 4,770 58 4,659 6 0 8 2,883 0 12,290 2,316 -. Woodbury j ;,10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figures are based on the most current census -figures. STUDY AS PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND COMPANY BY EACH CITY LISTED ABOVE. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986,.City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70 A. Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/ Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986, City Council meeting, authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action continued the license to allow for a public hearing and potential amendment to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm five (5) off -sale liquor licenses or remove the ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted within the community. With the continuation, of the public hearing at the June 17, 1986, meeting, this item was also continued. If action is now taken under Item F., Public Hearings, to remove the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications, this license can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the five (5), then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing the off -sale liquor license maximum from four to five as acted upon by the City Council at the May 6 meeting. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the application and police officer's report that were included with the June 17 packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor license for Curtis 0. Johnson for location at ® the Town Centre/Eagan Shopping Center. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments --A Solid Waste Abatement staff report was completed on April 1, 1986, by Admin- istrative Assistant Hohenstein. A recommendation was included in the report to appoint a Solid Waste Abatement Commission comprised of nine (9) members. The purpose for the Commission is to meet on an ad hoc basis as a factfinding body to explore solid waste abatement alternatives. As stated in the report "its end would be the generation of a recommended solid waste abatement strategy and policy for the City. The make-up of the Commission was proposed as follows: 1) private citizens (3), 2) refuse haulers (2), 3) small business (1), 4) large business (1), 5) local government (1), 6) public service organiza- tion (1). At the direction of the City Council, an article appeared in the May newsletter explaining the purpose of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, the recycling program of the City and also a solicitation to this commission. It was also discussed by the City Council that due to the specialized nature of the Commission, openings would be advertised in the City newsletter as opposed to using, the library of names. Since interest in serving on this commission has been limited to date and recognizing the importance of proceeding with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, it is suggested that the size of the Commission be reduced to five for purposes of appointment. The City Council --could reserve the right to expand the membership if additional - citizen or business representatives are interested in serving in future months. Those persons expressing an interest in serving on the Commission are as follows: 1) Darlene Barr, private citizen, who resides at 2081 Marble Lane, 2) Larry Knutson„ refuse hauler, of Knutson Rubbish ,Service, 3) Tom Mann, small business, who resides at 1231 Carlson Lake Lane and is the owner of the Greenskeepers business, 4) Jon Hohenstein, local government, and 5) additional business representative to be recommended by the Chamber of Commerce prior to the meeting on Tuesday. The City Administrator will be attending Solid Waste Abatement Commission meetings on behalf of the Mayor and City Council All the persons listed above have expressed interest in serving on the Commission and would accept an appointment by the City Council. A copy of a letter from Larry Knutson is enclosed on page Mr. Mann and Ms. Barr have discussed their appoint- ment by to lephone. In summary, it is recommended that the Commission be organized and these appointments be made at the July 15 City Council meeting. The total number of Commission members can either remain at 9 or be reduced to a number between 5 and 9. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider appointments to the Solid Waste Abatement Commission and, secondly, give consideration to readjusting the number of representatives on the Commission. NM fiill( -C 1961 RUBBISH SERVICE M315120 CHIPPENDALE AVE., ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 (612)423-2294 June 3, 1986 ® Mr. Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd P.O. Box 21-199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom, I would like you to know that if the Waste Abatement Management Commission is interested in having a haul- er become a member I would be very interested in that position. I believe it is important to have a representative from our industry on your Commission to help give some in- sight into the unique challenges that we would be facing. S' er lyZ_t LZ�karry son President KNUTSON RUBBISH SERVICE, INC. O Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three PLEDGE AGREEMENT & PROGRAM DOCUMENT FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS PROGRAM A. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/NRA First -Time Homebuyers Program --During the fall of 1985, the City of Eagan authorized the Dakota County HRA to undertake a $10,000,000 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. Early in 1986 a request was made by. the HRA to the City of Eagan to pledge revenues from the 1980 single-family mortgage revenue bond program for the purpose of reducing costs associated with the financing and acquisition of single-family homes for each first-time homebuyer. In order to the Dakota County HRA to proceed with the bond sale, a resolution must be adopted that authorizes and directs the execution of an assign- ment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single- family mortgage revenue bond in 1980 in the amount of $300,000 to the 1986 $10;000,000 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. As a part of that action, the City Council is adopting the program document for the 1986 bond sale,. Enclosed in each City Council packet without page number is a copy of the resolution and program document. If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact this office at any time. - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a pledge agreement directing execution of an assignment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single-family mortgage revenue bonds, Series 1980, and authorization of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 1986 Single -Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. RE Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four WAIVER OF PLAT/B.H. GRACE CORPORATION B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation.) Duplex Lot Split --The B. H. Grace Corporation has made application for a waiver of plat to allow lot splits for duplexes located on Vienna Lane. Fo_y a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for the B.H. Grace Corporation for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2„ and Lot 5, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: RONALD EBB (B.H. GRACE CORPORATION) LOCATION: L 1 & 2, BL 2, L 5, BL 3, RAHN RIDGE EXISTING ZONING: R-2, DOUBLE WITHIN MISSION HILLS P.D. (77-1) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 15, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 8, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting waivers of plat for 3 lots in the Rahn Ridge Addition. All 25 duplex lots meet or exceed the 15,000 S.F. per lot and the 100' width. The existing duplexs on lots 1 and 2 of block 2 and lot 5 of block 3 meet code setback.requirements and have separated utilities. All three lots are served by Vienna Lane. If approved, these waivers of plat shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. 1I FAH' 1 � f V. ;I : RAHN RIDGE • U, •7 LANE " , rLs• y •" � - -. r -y - YJ yr - �� � d.l l .] Y�� .lam ._J N.1-"_ 4 s . __ _�� •�Y it -/W ,1- I_ \ ���/(/ �J 4 1100 � • ,' .S •!` 1 L. yj, fR ' ♦ tar _ _ L. . , 1, 11 C •S' • U, •7 LANE " , rLs• y •" � - -. r -y - YJ yr - �� � d.l l .] Y�� .lam ._J N.1-"_ 4 s . •7 LANE " , rLs• y •" � 4' �, 1.. ... r -y - r ar-• -'�- yr - �� 11 :. 1 � ] .a f Y • � .] Y�� .lam ._J N.1-"_ 4 __ _�� •�Y it -/W ,1- I_ \ ���/(/ �J N 0140'3rW 11°0/ 915 C _ SS.03 S3.01 91 I ,,,1 ° 0/i _ S 5 � rt.66 Ma, I E*13Cin9 DO I � { Upp 10 I !S. 34 j u I IS I I I wh ;a5 I 44 &W", CU IIIII1I1 ° 3Tc VIENNR LRNE .34. 931 930.2 `.27.7 929.2 VIENNR LRNE 'L9a ?04 `R 17.cc �L•%a:oe pl N m o v ° -4 0 I L-so.°o -- - s{ 10000 NORTH U VIENNR \ I ,,,1 9)01 0/i _ S 5 � rt.66 Ma, I E*13Cin9 DO Upp 10 I !S. 34 ?04 `R 17.cc �L•%a:oe pl N m o v ° -4 0 I L-so.°o -- - s{ 10000 NORTH U VIENNR 140 143.54 NORTH \ ] t o 9)01 0/i _ S 5 140 143.54 NORTH Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five AMENDMENT/DAKOTA COUNTY BANK PYLON SIGN PERMIT C. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 Square Feet of Additional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign for Dakota County Bank --The City has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank requesting an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center along Cliff Road. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages 0 through�C�, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to the Dakota County State Bank pylon sign for additional ® square footage. a - Era MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM L STURM, PLANNER I DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK SIGNAGE AMENDMENT (LOT 2, BLOCK 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK) Staff has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank for an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center along Cliff Road. t A conditional use permit was approved for this sign on February 25, 1985 and condition 3 stated that the sign shall be no more than 20' in height and shall not exceed 70 square feet in sign area. This reader board pylon sign now has the allowable 70 square feet per side. The additional sign should fit nicely in the remaining open area and no other signage is being requested. Typically, 125 square feet of sign area per side is permitted on pylon signs. The $2.50/S.F. sign fee has been submitted with the application. If approved, this amendment shall include this sign (25 S.F.) only and the 95 S.F./side will not be increased in the future."""" 1. Y� \ ® Pla ner cc: Elmer Borgschatz JLS/jeh 6 T 1 I 3 Exl-sTiNG SIGN 3' X /o" AC -TAC F11 -LEA FRAME CD. BRoazs� r INSTANT eASH SIGN 1 101 111111 /IY.0 /�/�lflll_lL1ltiC1� 8, 3 6 /0! IIN Iy LOBSY..,� -WHITE LETTERS SIGN LAYOUT PROPbSAL BY, ATTRACTA SIGN, INC. 6407 PENN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55423 7-I-86 _SCAL.E. �6 57 1-1 �1-�I--ITT I HlI -LJ5,-ma-. Je.T 6164' �ulr o . v"n�GQ. LS '¢"foiF2 LS v, r INSTANT eASH SIGN HlI -LJ5,-ma-. Je.T 6164' �ulr o . v"n�GQ. LS '¢"foiF2 LS • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986; City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REZONING/OVERHILL FARM IST ADDITION D. Rezoning (Overhill Properties, Inc.) from R-2 (Residential Double,) to R-1 (Residential Single) for Certain Lots in Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 24, 1986, to consider a rezoning application submitted by Mr. David Dehler, Overhill Properties, Inc.-, for a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition from R-2, Residential Double District, to R-1, Residential Single District. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending that the rezoning be granted. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy's enclosed on pages I through45 For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)�r�. There is no change in parkland dedication fees proposed for this rezoning. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ,ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for certain lots within Block 2,, Overhill Farm 1st Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MR DAVID DEHLER, OVERHILL PROPERTIES INC LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, 5, IST ADDITION, EXISTING ZONING: R-2 - DOUBLE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 17, 1986 6 & 7, BLOCK 2, OVERHILL FARMS SA, SEC 25 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The application submitted is a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition, from R-2, Residential Double District, to R=1, Residential Single District. ►, COMMENTS. Presently, there are existing duplexes on Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition. Therefore, there has been some development in this block and some continuity should be retained in this area. It appears that .nothing is constructed east of Block 4 through Block 7, of which there is a single-family horde constructed on Lot 7. If a rezoning should occur,_ .possibly..Lots 5 _.through 7 could be 'rezoned to single — family and continue the single-family line to Lot 4. It would then be suggested that Lots 1 through 4 would then remain R-2 or duplex lots, up to where Hay Lake Road intersects with Dodd Road. This would appear to make more continuity and flow within the development versus isolating two duplex lots in this sub- division. The request would be to rezone or a portion of the ,lots as Because of the rezoning requests, attached to this zoning change. DCR/jj 93 all of the lots from R-2 to R-1 suggested by the staff report. there are no specific conditions r/ AUDITOR'S eueu %O..e ,LAKESIDE PARK R p 3 .� r vRLxur xnL SfxNRxj PIPE _ {Iff PRRFI LIRfSlot PAR{ ` ' g Ili Y SWI. l 1 i AUDITOR'S eueu %O..e ,LAKESIDE PARK OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION r I • . , 1 • 1 / • ' 1 jjj \ 1. 1 1 I • D ; f• I � 1 • 1 I I • N �Y L \ • •30 Ae • • Oal AG 0.36 AC. �.• 471 A:'� 1�1 �i ♦\li slft �\ • OT J r � �•. 41 I • . ---- 1COVXTY NATE f1 AID XfI4�N•W P.- .._.•au-.... ...a�. l Cnl1NT`f ✓ ^TL'/_E \ NU •M.(o'v •Ill iJl� r� r, DaAm.4a ..D DxITT uavawn SECTION 15.TV, U2 u l+ a Dl4o"I' 1/C M _ . &WT "T •Ira MOby 964.1 RA AND MAaYJD by al4la TlM AND TIDW W. I07911 U�1V" •1 TNY,Nlsm aAowN. +s N Au Twe err wa ar rNa e MFs er Txa aw V ,are. e•.n N �: y la AaSVMaD TD w.V• . 1 MAIUYi Or 6D-la'90a R SI, yti�Da WTCD IIANT Or 6..J IN P..T i / Ol ACCE"' DaDICATaD TID LD JDI4 44 aTallT CIX!• DAwOTX COUNTY • a• x• M a�1 _ /�� 4L✓ 1 IxCN . nD raaT 9EWCH MARK ELEVATION 955.TT _ TDP NUT of NYDa4NT M TN[ a.W. QU/.DCANT —1- W DOI DD MD LXD CLIr1 4DI.D fl. _ DaAm.4a ..D DxITT uavawn SECTION 15.TV, U2 u Au a..D.14 TNw _ ID7rH K.: as 44 ID r!1♦ IQ MIDTN AND a4D `•.2 i / /' LD JDI4 44 aTallT CIX!• 1•l a Y, 'a F�{` /�� 4L✓ •J rCaT IY WIDTX YID I.D' !014144 LOT LINED U4LeN .•._.. v. •.� •. _) Drwaa.ala. IYD¢AT+D. LOCATION MAP 9EWCH MARK ELEVATION 955.TT _ TDP NUT of NYDa4NT M TN[ a.W. QU/.DCANT —1- W DOI DD MD LXD CLIr1 4DI.D fl. _ APC Minutes June 24, 1986 preliminary plat, a variance from the parking requirements would be necessary. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of Town Centre 100 Second Addition, consisting of Lots 1 and 2, and Outlot A for future commercial development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a maximum. of 1 driveway along Denmark Avenue in line with the previously approved Burger King driveway and a maximum of 2 driveway accesses along. Town Centre Dr. with the appropriate setbacks and separations, and Lot 2, Block 1, be allowed 1 access driveway onto Town Centre Drive with the appropriate separation, 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 4. A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submitted and not released until one year after completion. The landscape plan shall be 40 submitted on an approved grading plan at the time of final plat. 5. The developer shall be responsible for a 6 foot sidewalk along Town Centre Drive. 6. The trash container shall be incorporated into the building for the convenience of the occupants, and aesthetics of the site. AL1 voted yes. Mulrooney moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance for a reduction of 4 parking spaces based on staff recommendations regarding green 'space. All voted yea. OVERHILL PROPERTIES, INC. - REZONING The public hearing was then convened regarding the request of Overhill Properties, Inc. for rezoning from R-2. to R-1 for Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 of Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, in the northeast quadrant of Dodd and Cliff Roads, by Chairman Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the request and indicated the staff's recommendation that two duplex lots remain to the west of the existing duplex lots for continuity and flow. Mr. Dave Dehler appeared indicating that Lot 1 was perhaps too small for a twin home. The Commission discussed the Comprehensive Guide which indicated that the property was designated R -II. Hall moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of Lots 5, 6, and 7 with Lots 1 and 2 remaining as duplex lots, pursuant to staff recommendation, and due to the size of Lot 2 and the triple frontage of Lot 1. Mulrooney and Hall voted in favor; Voracek, Wilkins and Harrison voted against. Wilkins then moved to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7,.Block 2 to R-1 Single Family, Harrison seconded the motion. Harrison, Voracek and Wilkins voted in favor; Hall and Mulrooney voted against. MY C • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company - Mark Baird) ,for an Advertising Sign --A public hearing washeld at the June 24, 19'86, Advisory Planning. Commission meeting to consider an application that was submitted by Indy Outdoor Adver- tising requesting a two- (2) sided pylon sign fronting, on I-4.9'4 in the Eagandale Office Park. The APC is recommending denial. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pagesthrough Also enclosed on page/6 / is a copy of a Tette from Tom Davis representing Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company opposing the proposed sign. The APC minutes are enclosed on page(s) /Q 7� is ACTION TO BE tional use (Mark Baird') the Eagandale • CONSIDERED ON THIS permit for Indy for a two-sided Office Park, 97 ITEM: To approve or Outdoor Advertising pylon sign fronting deny a condi- Sign Company on I-494 in a CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGN) APPLICANT: INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY LOCATION: LOT 14, BLOCK 1, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: L1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPT (JIM STURM) ® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Indy Outdoor Advertising requesting a two sided pylon sign fronting on I-494 in the Eagandale Office Park. This sign would be located on the Vendmark lot. COMMENTS: Lot 14 is 200' wide and 445' deep. The proposed 40' tall, spot lighted sign will be located 60' from the eastern property line and 20' south of the,. I-494 R.O.W. If this sign were approved, no other pylon signs on Lots 1, 12, 13, 15 and the unplatted 6.47 acre outlot to the east would be permitted due to -the lineal 1,.0001 _.requirement. The signage area would be 10'6" x 36' per side with a total area of 378 S.F. Code allows 250 S.F. (125/side) and a 40' maximum height for hardship reasons when approved by the City Council. ® CONDITIONS: 1. Maximum height shall be determined by the City Council and recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2. _The applicant shall be subject to the one time sign permit fee of $,2:50/S.F. qe . _ L494 -�'�I � F5 .4 i So u ' '--=1': '�{� ti' r� ':�%_�: �i �; :� Vii-.. tri `; p ....0 • h: p ._.'�����..._'._ .i � ens .ted � �'' � •� `.r ♦I _. I -MO -0 Al. Poimr.a RosCw6dwaic. — - a June 24, 1986 The Honorable Chairman and Members, Eagan Planning Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Indy Outdoor Advertising Company Dear Madame Chairman; On your June 24 agenda, you are scheduled to consider conditional use permit for an outdoor advertising sign on property which is surrounded by our Eagandale Industrial Park. Please be advised that we at Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., which own most of the undeveloped land within the Eagandale Industrial Park, are opposed to this proposed sign. We think the unplanned and indiscriminate location of billboard signs along the newly extended I-494 or 35E throughfares of Eagan is poor land use policy. We believe that the city should be encouraging high image, quality developments similar to what we have planned and began to implement along I-494 as opposed to the billboard signs. The ability to attract new businesses, jobs and increased tax base to the community mandates that you not squander away your opportunities to create what is emerging as a very appealing "front door" image for your city. Sincerely, Thomas S. Davis Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. TSD;jo /� 40 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co. for an advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner. Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard ® signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION ® PRELIMINARY PLAT S REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. 4 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight PRELIMINARY PLAT & REVISED SITE PLAN/FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition (Sienna Corporation) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986,.APC meeting to consider a revised preliminary plat for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and contains 68 single-family lots which deviates from the R-1 single -district lot size requirement. The APC is recommending approval of the -revised plan and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report; a copy is. enclosed on pages/Q through >/3 for your review. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to pages _4through ;V6 The original Advisory Parks & ®Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; there- fore, they have no additional recommendations. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the preliminary plat and revised site plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition. /Q_3 • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT - FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION - RODNEY HARDY LOCATION: PART OF THE SA, SEC 25 & PART OF THE NEa OF THE SE;, SEC 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-2, LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY: JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 18, 1986 PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted to revise the site plan and preliminary plat of the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and will contain 68 single-family lots which deviate from the R-1 Residential Single District lot size requirement. - ZONING & LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R-2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 376 dwelling units per .acre under the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. This agreement was entered into by the owner of the property and the City in -- 1977. ----The Eagan -Land Use -Guide designates this parcel as R -I, --- Single Residential District, with a density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre. Since there is a Planned Development Agreement governing the land, the Development Agreement for Lexington South Planned Development would supersede the density allowed in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: The preliminary plat, Fawn Ridge, was originally presented to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in late 1983. There was some discussion in regard to lot size and the original plan approved consisted of 93 single-family lots, which deviated from the lot size criteria, 44 twinhome lots, 88 dwelling units for a total of 181 dwelling units. The applicants phased this development into two phases of which the first phase has been constructed and built. The applicants are now looking at the second phase for development. In the second phase, there are 37 duplex lots and approximately 23 smaller single-family lots for a total of 97 dwelling units to be constructed. Since 1983, the applicants have changed their development concept and would like to develop the entire tract of Fawn Ridge into single lots. The revised plat carries the same circulation FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN.'.,.._ JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 pattern, which was approved in 1983, and deviated some of the lot lines to correspond with their new development plan. The net reduction in the second phase of development would be 29 dwelling units. This revised preliminary plat and site plan will now carry the connotation of all single-family lo-cs in the Fawn Ridge Addition. The lot sizes in the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition will exceed the lot size criteria in width and area. Most of the lots in the second addition have a lot width of 75' with a few lots dropping to a width of 70' at the 30' setback line. Therefore, the lots in the second addition exceed lot sizes in the first addition in both area and width. In review of this revised preliminary plat and revised site plan for the Lexington Place Planned Development, the question should be whether this is a better use of the land than what was originally approved in the Fawn Ridge preliminary plat. GRADING/DRAINAGE: Staff has reviewed the preliminary grading plans submitted by this applicant and found it to be feasible. However, staff does have a few recommendations which the applicant should incorporate into his final grading plan. Staff recommends the applicant provide overland emergency drainage ways at all low pointsinthe roadway. This can be accomplished by grading a slight swale down the property lines in the area of the roadway low points. Although the applicant proposes to fill a portion of Pond LP -33, the amount is not significant and will not adversly affect the total amount of storage volume available for Pond LP -33. The net reduction. in high water area amounts to about one-tenth of an acre. This equates to a reduction of about 3.0% of the high water ponding area. In staff's opinion, this is not significant. Besides, the available storage volume for this pond is about 12 acre feet compared with the required storage volume of 8.5 acre feet. This proposed development lies within Major Drainage District L as shown on Figure 1. Based on the applicant's grading plan, - staff estimates about 75% of the drainage flows into Pond LP -33. The remaining drainage flows into Pond LP -65. LP -33 presently has an outlet to Pond LP -61. This pond is experiencing high water problems because it has no positive gravity outlet. However, Council authorized a project on June 17, 1986, providing an outlet to this pond and several other downstream ponds under Project 444R that will eliminate the high water problems. This project is scheduled for completion late this fall. UTILITIES: Staff reviewed the utility layout for this development with the original Fawn Ridge preliminary plat application in 1983. The minor changes and revisions that the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition proposes from the original Fawn Ridge /D5 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 preliminary plat do not result in any changes in the utility layout for this development. It is feasible to provide sanitary sewer and water service to this ,lot by extending the existing utilities from the Fawn Ridge 1st Addition. Staff does recommend, however, that the applicant extend the water main from north Hay Lake Road to Cliff Road. This will allow for future connection to the City's 20" trunk water main along the north side of Cliff Road when it is installed. STREETS: Dodd Road borders this development along the east and Cliff Road borders this development along the south. Dodd Road is designated as a City collector street. It is not currently built to its full 9 -ton 44' wide collector street status. Cliff Road is presently a two lane rural highway under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Staff discussed the ® accesses onto Dodd Road and Cliff Road in the original engineering report in 1983. Staff has no concerns regarding these accesses. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall be required to dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Dodd Road and a 65' half right-of-way for Cliff Road. The developer shall dedicate all easements required by Code. Also, the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over all public utilitiesnot located within public right-of-way. Lastly, the developer shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. ASSESSMENTS: The trunk area related assessments for this development have been levied. However, the future extension of ® the 20" trunk water line along Cliff Road will generate a lateral benefit to this proposed development. Staff recommends having this development assume the lateral benefit at this time rather than waiting until the 20" trunk water main is constructed and this development is built. In accordance with City policy regarding lateral benefit from trunk water main, staff proposes that this development is responsible for one-half its net frontage adjacent Cliff Road or approximately 620'. The 1986 rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main is $11.88 making the total estimated obligation of this development about $7,360. The final amounts will be determined by the final plat distances and the rates in effect at the time of final platting. A,ll other costs resulting from the installation of internal public streets and utilities for this development will be the sole responsibility of this development. 166 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40' half right-of-way and a 65' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Road, respectively. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20' radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water, main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Departmeant of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot 'size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated 5-14-86. 12. The plat shall be subject to the Parc Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. /0 7 E m 9 r— --.•T —�I OVERH:LA. FARM. AOO:T:ON LOCATION MAP GENERAL INFORMATION ORO••R.PIA. S1.11 AE.I. IT .E.•IIR: SOS uRiEu... l ALL DIV NEIGH. ARE En.EREri.0 r.•i.•r•E """' """ "" "" "'• "" -- FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION flooE---- NGINEERING """ """" PRELIMINARY T COMPANY, INC. - --'--- - o.E I •O. IT. SIALLEST LOT SIZE: .� •O. Ir. IVERAoE w. SIZE. M,OO ED Ir - ..o .RE m•.Ecr TO ...... OR Ii..0 .LAI. FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES , C0Np�1 T LEGAL DESCRIPTION i i - � rcun H I U < —J 2ND ADOMON FAWN R:O•GE +T ADD^:GN ze • w0<p � pO NOOIL W \ n rT j IV ILVV CLIFF ROAll r— --.•T —�I OVERH:LA. FARM. AOO:T:ON LOCATION MAP GENERAL INFORMATION ORO••R.PIA. S1.11 AE.I. IT .E.•IIR: SOS uRiEu... l ALL DIV NEIGH. ARE En.EREri.0 r.•i.•r•E """' """ "" "" "'• "" -- FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION flooE---- NGINEERING """ """" PRELIMINARY T COMPANY, INC. - --'--- - o.E I •O. IT. SIALLEST LOT SIZE: .� •O. Ir. IVERAoE w. SIZE. M,OO ED Ir - ..o .RE m•.Ecr TO ...... OR Ii..0 .LAI. FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES , �,- LP -33 i I� .POND DATA r _ r" jlTij:, \ G -_-__- _--- - ------------- ----------------- ------ ---------- -- - ------------------- CLIFF _ ... yPOND DATA _ --_--•---------- ---' - ------- ' ---- ---- -- PAM INIINARV ROAD / ------ - no""'"°' GRADING DRAINAGE AND nxxxw ..v uxo'wxvnu" •"FAWN RIDGE EN GIN EEflING "' •' EROSION CONTROL PLAN ASSOCIATES 2 CDMPNNY• INC. - ,.`3 o4 r41 CKFAG AIPIP, 10/82.0 I?" 35 5/50 0 4L6]%• 1y I]5 ^. III 41.2/ 540 :2 r] 208 20] 91 I' 116-1. ��.'� 53,1/68,0 : 503/6>0 r,-- 1 23�51,4/65.0 184/290 180�6NO GE 5000 BOOSTERHWL. 1059 ri W 24 V- 7 I 12 184 68,)/]40IB5852/950 IBB660/9 0 ]4.4/82.0r DCLE20'•-5ATF>0.8/]6.� 9PgTGIrllx!' 456/580 j 7201L LC hi 12' � z 5].],)20 �/24**'2" '`y*116 66]/850op 42.2/580 )390/545/950I2•121020 2b 1020 251. 203 43.3/580 I / O 984/990__1 4)6/7 — 19] 195 1 -\ )46/6]0 209 9]2/1020��V 1 12 8.196 2 J rIGP 199 47,5/63.0 506/660 93 7/1040 I 1 1 1 112 �i� 1 I64 / 61. 944/ 1000 — s/P 1 1CCLJ irr))8,]/91 0 C EP �' VUrt/ PIW'�PARSUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMF nd WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3 approved -I standard plate ##: - Y"I.ov- 2 J rIGP 199 47,5/63.0 506/660 93 7/1040 I 1 1 1 112 �i� 1 I64 / 61. 944/ 1000 — s/P 1 1CCLJ irr))8,]/91 0 C EP �' VUrt/ PIW'�PARSUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMF nd WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3 approved -I standard plate ##: - eJJ.o J_o(J� tltl49 1/ / J. / 949.1 I i JP -21 °11 90 U BI5.3�ill JP-23J-9�89001 852.2 _ � A: � / 8579 - BI87 I-�""'"- 8J00J -n5`il r` 3 se// \ L/r �N. JP -24 ;� \ 09327'3 9.0 n4fr ��- JP-34'�� J -s JP -25 / B 9.2 ' �'1 L4;.n -I 884,01 JP -53 JP -22 \ 817.0 1 0 P,nN - \`. _ B9/, 9J 1 8640 VVV\ 8000 \\ 8240 830 C1dAl. .I BB09 92620 m1 \ 111L.5.-18 9450 � -1-1--r_c-r--•, J I JP -2.7 JP0-2.6 �r \ .9048290dF 51 x 0 ryy 9760 9-0�0 J-ee -BJP-2.8 99ll `;�...rl JP-52 8JP 68 80853 78. 1 n( JP -50 961. ,0 I Ln 1 r 971.7 8790790 1 -I r I ILP -40 6643 L� 898.0 _ L%�:� 9035 '�1_�i:LP' � CP -61 -2['LP-488913 �8844 LP -69 B9S6-\, ggg5 L5. 24 8878 P 53 'rc r 89Jo z,BB3,6P 52 LP 648 80 ._.I / - LB7926LP 39 9004 lJ( 60 LP 37 BB15 U 9940 r LP -31 "" '2 9006 ,! 8783 9/00LP 70 - BB06 'i LP 33 I 9/00 891,6 . LP 51 17 LP -35 LP 30..78863 1 LP 47, 90/2 65.0 0 le LP -36 9705 879 U::•7:h'y96 LP -49' 1. 9080 LP -30 9 973.5 862pp BBOO BBB:h:•7}}};•; 9124 9/06 908.3 L5.-26 \ 8645 eJ 9190 916.0 •---f- r��� f_" r :� I i5_L _p z7- 910 LP -13 920.4 \C 922.0 Iz' C city of eagan o[\1, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME L LP7 35 B .5 8L B78 0 65 0 .5 120 I z' GOON i'Y LP -21 LP -24 902.5 q, 883.2 1"-''` 9030 886.0 Iz �c LP019 2 1 'LP -IB 90J,0 9086 _ 9107 LP -22 901 0 9040 LP - 213. „/SLP -66 a . 1 LP -68 915 0 LP -20 4 9152 LP 9/73 f\ LP -13 920.4 \C 922.0 Iz' C city of eagan o[\1, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME L LP7 35 B .5 8L B78 0 65 0 .5 120 I z' GOON i'Y LP -21 LP -24 902.5 q, 883.2 1"-''` 9030 886.0 Iz �c LP019 2 1 'LP -IB 90J,0 9086 _ 9107 LP -22 901 0 9040 LP - 213. „/SLP -66 a . 1 LP 28 :: 915 0 LP L 92002 .2 923.6 ` /n/LP-27 9254 I 'l u) . I I H4iDii�RE a LP 23 //' �953 12./ 9253 I SUBJECT PARCEL InCL STORM SEWER • _ /i v MASTER PLAN FIG. +1 approved: standard - plate #: i `LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' �rDNn HILL i..- i, ' 2ND ADOMON I / /�\ �.\\ FAWN RIDGE \ +I, ���—J I L_ �' IST ADDITION LOCATION MAP •j' n I '1 \ v 00~\ f Ob_Rrl:,.l. FARM GENERAL INFORMATION \ pONO —Na— AGo—� T �.• .... _T ^�-1 y\ I `v 1O•� ° `\� r � ADOTONTOTAL au"na+u+xo Tow:No: Ts°-. INOL. ueiLT LOTS: IF uu.. 1. .1 LuefNT LOT + ... ._ 3. J / I 'tr1. fa IT. um Lor ..T.; ..... •o. IF. • _ '.� "T, •r[mf u! 1.•" \ /J'\ STAN..: •.e+uwn•uuf "L°T [° f0. IT. xI= e M • . rr \ • • + w .^ — ` A ^\ \/ V \ ALL SIS.NfN+rw+ALuau rNur. AN. ANS ICT To C"ANIN ON FINAL PLAT.' � I .�• r AAAA `� ,.. +. : � '' ' mu pNI IF lu I 1e1• A If _CLIFF RbAD ------------ J none fTNTLL1iNTApi��p+T o fFAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION N _ .Nf.°f. ENGINEERING ^�•'� �y"_ PRELIMINARY PLAT `�.,.: w FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES COMPANY, INC. �""''' --:. '�:" -- 3 L Seo f.w �... vnn. onnu6 N.xeuer. fnv T..N.•oTc ""10" APC Minutes June 24, 1986 INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co, for an advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ® ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION ® PRELIMINARY PLAT b REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with 'a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. //�' 4 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Roads, respectively_.. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public, utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. _ 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail Is requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING 6 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary plat on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine COMPRI HOTEL G. Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant and Rezoning from GB & LI to Commercial Planned Development and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986,.APC meeting to consider three (3) applications submitted by the Opus Corporation for a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a 6 story, "Compri Hotel." The City staff initiated a comprehensive guide plan amendment as a part of the application process for considering this application_ The APC did recommend approval of ® the four applications as presented. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report, refer to pages / through12 For a copy of the action that was taken by the APC, refer fo those minutes found on pages/7,Lthrough /3a . 0 The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the 1986 rate for the commercial and industrial park land dedication fee and a trailway on Pilot Knob Road. ACTION TO BE 'CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning from GB & LI to commercial planned development, 2) comprehensive guide plan amendment, 3) preliminary plat approval, and 4) a conditional use permit. 1116 CITY OF RAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION - COMPRI HOTEL LOCATION: LOTS 1,2,3, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE IND. PARR #1 AND OUTLOT A EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS), LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 24 JUNE, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: 13 JUNE, 1986 ® REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: Three separate applications have been submitted by Opus Corporation requesting a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a six story "Compri Hotel". The plat will consist of 2 lots with the second lot a proposed restaurant facility. This 7 acre site will require rezoning from GB (General Business) and L-1 (Light Industrial) to a commercial planned development on -.-lots _1, 2, and 3, Block 1 in the Eagandale. Industrial Park No. 1 and Outlot A in the Eagandale Office Park. The site abuts Pilot Knob Road to the west, Corporate Center Drive on the south and the new 5 story Sperry Corp. Building to the northeast. This Rezoning and Preliminary Plat will require a comprehensive guide plan amendment. COMPRI HOTEL: The proposed 6 story (70' tall) 190 room hotel will be the first hotel along the 494 corridor in Eagan. Compri Hotels contain. only first class guest rooms and amenities are limited. No large scale meeting rooms are proposed and restaurant facilities will be provided for guests only. Since the building is over 3 stories, a Conditional Use Permit will be required. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will also require the hotel to have an interior noise level of 50 decibels or less. An application for a restaurant liquor license will be submitted to the City in the near future. The architectural styling of the hotel will attempt to blend with the Sperry Building that is nearing completion. The brick and glass exterior will be accented by the tinted glass stair tower and canopied entries. The brick trash enclosure on the western side of the building will be accessed by a service drive and employee parking area. Additional plant material along with the existing oaks will screen this portion of the site. 1� 7 COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 2 Access to the hotel will be from a lines up with Corporate Center Drive. in front of the hotel to a canopied the building. PARKING AND STORAGE separated entry drive that This entry drive will loop entrance on the east side of City Code requires one (1) parking stall per dwelling room and one (1) additional space for each eight (8) units. This would require 214 stalls for the hotel alone. Due to the proximity of the airport and that the restaurant facilities within the hotel are private, fewer parking stalls are being proposed. 110 10' X 20' stalls (9' X 20' employee) are shown on the site plan. No pylon signs are proposed. The main signage will be building mounted.on the stair towers. Code requires: 1) That no more than one (1) business sign for each major street frontage shall be permitted on a building for each • business located within such building. 2) All business signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design. 3) No signs or combination of signs mounted upon a building shall cover in excess of 208 of the gross area of side. 4) The signage shall not project more than 10" from the vertical surface of the building. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and special care will be used to save as many of the existing oaks as the site plan allows. Additional plant material along Corporate Center Drive similar to that in the Eagandale Office Park (Pilot Knob Road and Avalon Ave). All 3:1 slopes and the twin 6' retaining wall areas will need careful landscape plant material selection. The 2:1 slopes will require "ground covers" to stabilize the slopes and to provide for. little or no maintenance. LOT 2: This proposed restaurant facility is not scheduled for construction until the hotel is near completion/or completed. Although the lot will be platted, Opus Corporation will submit site plans to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval prior to the Issuance of the building permit. The Code requires one (1) parking stall for each three (3) seats based on the capacity of the restaurant. 79 10' x 20' stalls are proposed thus enabling an approx. 2'40 seat Class 1 (sit down) restaurant to be built on this lot. The restaurant will have a separate vehicular entry of its own and can share the access to the hotel if so needed. 1/e COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 3 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading proposed on the preliminary grading plan is feasible. It will require two 6 ft. high terraced retaining walls northeasterly of the proposed hotel building. These are required due to the large natural ravine running down the easterly property line of this proposed development. These retaining walls will allow the developer to grade to 3:1 slopes. The 3:1 slopes appear to be the steepest slopes proposed over this development. These slopes are the minimum allowed for maintenance. The natural topography slopes to the north and the proposed grading plan does not change any of that. This development lies within the center of Major Drainage District H, as shown on Figure 1. The developer is proposing some internal storm sewer to collect runoff from the parking lots and directed into a City trunk line located along this development's easterly property line. This line flows into the City's trunk line located adjacent I-494, which eventually ends up into the Minnesota River ® Valley. The 54" trunk line connects with a 27" trunk line from Pilot Knob Road at Pond HP -3 as shown on Figure 1. However, recent study of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area indicates that the capacity of the 54" pipe cannot be exceeded due to flow restrictions upstream. Therefore, Pond HP -3 does not appear to be necessary. The applicant's engineer is preparing a revision to the Master Plan for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area to handle the storm water runoff by adding additional upstream ponding areas. As a result, staff has no concerns with the encroachment into the ponding area HP -3 as shown on the grading plan. This project will not require any trunk storm sewer improvements on behalf of the City. UTILITIES: According to City record plans, sanitary sewer and water services were extended to Lots 2 and 3 of the Eagandale ® Center Industrial Park. The water service was a 2" diameter line and the sanitary sewer service was a 6" diameter line. Both appear to be at elevations that will suit the proposed building sites. In lieu of this, staff questions the necessity for the separate sanitary sewer line proposed by the developer. Because this line connects to an MWCC collector, the developer will have to obtain the necessary per to connect into this line. Also, because this proposed sanitary sewer connects two lots, it would have to be turned over to the City with an easement dedicated over the line. Staff recommends using the existing sanitary sewer services if possible. The disadvantages of the proposed sanitary sewer line include: 1. MWCC connection permit required. 2. Access for maintenance more difficult than the existing sewer within Corporate Center Drive. This development will not require any extension of any City trunk water or sanitary sewer lines. COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 4 STREETS: Corporate Center Drive and Pilot Knob Road abut the southerly and westerly portions of this proposed development. Pilot Knob Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County with controlled access. Corporate Center Drive is a collector street for the Industrial Park. Neither roadway will require any upgrading as a result of this development with the exception of possible signalization when traffic warrants it. It is presently being discussed as a part of the County Highway 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. The applicant's grading plan shows the primary driveway to this development lining up with Corporate Center Curve which is necessitated by the potential high traffic volume associated with this proposed development. Staff estimates the hotel would generate about 2,000 trips per day based upon full occupancy. The miniumum throat widths for each driveway access shall be 30'. The separation between driveways is 200' which is the minimum separation staff would recommend on a collector street such as Corporate Center Drive. • RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development will not be responsible for dedicating any additional street right-of:way because the City has already obtained the necessary right-of-way through previous platting. - This development shall dedicate a 20' utility easement adjacent the Corporate Center Drive property line. The remaining easements shall be dedicated in accordance with City Code. Staff recommends the developer dedicate a 10' utility easement lying '' -- southwesterly of the easterly property line. --The existing easement is too narrow to reasonably perform any repairs to the sewer line which may be necessary. If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer • shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over the portion of sanitary sewer line designated as a City line. PERMITS: If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer will be responsible for the following -permits: 1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC connection permit. ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments have been levied. /7-'0 COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 5 CON^ITIONS 1) All standard platting, rezoning procedures be adhered to. 2) This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. 3) All signage code requirements be adhered to. 4) The trash area, perimeter parking be screened from public streets. 5) A detailed landscape plan be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plant materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes.. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the installation. 6) The total number of parking stalls be approved as the • site plan demonstrates. 7) A separate liquor license be issued for the hotel's restaurant. 8) Lot 2 be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9) The plat be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10) The main access drive to this site line up with Corporate Center Curve 11) The two accesses into this development be separated by a minimum of 200' and be a minimum of 30' wide. ® 12) A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent the Corporate Center Drive right-of-way. 13) A 10' utility easement be dedicated adjacent the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14) This development will be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. %-kl 4 2 . � • 1 F 1, .n ] ,] k 15 �•� d 2 a: )ALE BUSINESS C MPW 6 T NEIN w7LUNn 21 DIVISION 10 IIPRO 1 .tet n.le n 5 494 MINNESOTA HIGMVAY PUN SYSIECI TO CHANGE. i f J MBc EE mow+ UAE u.nAr.0 4Yk' uHm Ems I� LE MAW urDt - 494 MINNESOTA HIGMVAY PUN SYSIECI TO CHANGE. i f J MBc EE KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS le bme R.mJIgr9. •C .e Br.wn.vu .k 21 E.;uMAum...m 5mm N IN y.yq W Nv 5�p..c ]6 r fail.+wl v+y Ep• 24 i •n �� 4Yk' h - h�h � ae AFF '9 rob L LOIINGTpI BO%B L T.•••1] STANDARD LUMBER .` 'r. • ,e pN'L`,P C PFRB EN ARENSE H'W F 14 ]SCOTT ROADWAY E%PRESS BUILDING CENTER REDOY+U 25, 16 75 "= 12' r1 GCS[ ; 211 IT[Gf� ]] w 22 ECONOMICS I UBORATORY E �.nATnn L u COMPANY CORPORATE THE DONALDSON + , ..... SQUARE COMPANY I U.S. .E POSTAL SERVICE BULKL CENTER r • J r r LSI 9 �[ �? .-� I • .. — . KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS le bme R.mJIgr9. •C .e Br.wn.vu .k 21 E.;uMAum...m 5mm N IN y.yq W Nv 5�p..c ]6 r fail.+wl v+y Ep• 24 I N i SCALE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION M .B.Ir �vMYRL.c.. ae "e 8 "]' 14 NAlUN4 BUILDING CENTER REDOY+U 25, 16 5NYDER 211 I N i SCALE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION M .B.Ir �vMYRL.c.. 0 I I �1 I' I II I I - I 1 1 EMPLOYE[ POOL (1) 115) 1 P1 FIND � � �_ =1 ', 3l 1 1 EDEI1 I I I ot._. �- 1 n' SERVICE DRIVE • . O ♦ O - \)`,\ 1 6S RANT `♦ as00 BF \ ,':ICE —� --�—--EID7a —�--( --�-- CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE (el Plant Legend SHADE TREES - 2 cal. B SIGN PURPLE ASH. ORC IC LINDEN. MFEF4Y ViGZ O MARSHALL'S ABX, SUGAR MAPLE O FLOWERING TREES - 1 CLI. BB CRABAPPLE, JAPANESE TREEE LILAC, I/ /� YS ♦\` LER YIC ELERRT, AYUR MAPLE / �/ �. '�J�f ��rr�--ii���'}j q CONIFER TREES - 6' At. BB 1 j �' '{ li, / / ` ! I}f` �1" ♦ COLORADO SPRUCE, AUSTRIAN PIN! 2 1 % �,, / i�([Iyy ' y/^� ' ♦`,+ EVERGREEN SHRUBS - 24' dia. Cont. , t.i�. ® JUNIPER. YEW y.,5:4N kJ'\ LAWN � /,' EXISTING TREES I �*-OF. M Ali � I I �, I / 1 / I STI �, URANT♦ CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE /)- HP I MENDOTA 701.8, - IX p ST SrLn O Wali .LL3 I D -. all EY I !/; 2EWXEDI j L__, _ ._ 3p I a rE5 I II ' I C I .. L E P. 4 V / 24• s G: 1.11 C 1 -0 F HP -13 E 8435 a 856.0 f 1,Hi'I!1 1,11 p I I I 24' \ III -DP 17 "D -f '• 8 80.0 - .;881.9 -. I E —� II_E J. P-4 8U7 827 7 LS. -4 842.6.1111.1 87 l i 11/1 CP -3 6 CP -5 850.5 8730 v u IAN I #759 fFr Fp% I4reIIIL Fl - CP -10=S €J [r 19 7900 18020JI I� i •I III . j ;74.8 DP 2 30 D ,J ; .878:/ 11 NP97 IN/!I /. N� HTS. 36 I m 1NDA LEI 'i 1 _ 839 01 6CLN 6 FP 832: J j - \ ., ! 839 r, _ YM[-Fl 7_ \ !6' I D MI +." .812.0 rn•+C.1�E C�,TER / 1 + iE-sEr EILCnE o' 12- 24 iEaD D-: / �E• aOaLE J0-m L.S-30 . E-472 Iz __ I - OP -19 ._ a rE5 I II ' I C I .. L E P. 8 866 66,0 0 ,ia I 1._1 J l/" . DP IS 1,11 p I I I 24' \ III -DP 17 "D -f '• 8 80.0 - .;881.9 -. I E —� II_E J. P-4 8U7 827 7 LS. -4 842.6.1111.1 87 l i 11/1 CP -3 6 CP -5 850.5 8730 v u IAN I #759 fFr Fp% I4reIIIL Fl - CP -10=S €J [r 19 7900 18020JI I� i •I III . j ;74.8 DP 2 30 D ,J ; .878:/ 11 NP97 IN/!I /. N� HTS. 36 I m 1NDA LEI 'i 1 _ 839 01 6CLN 6 FP 832: J j - \ ., ! 839 r, _ YM[-Fl 7_ \ !6' I D MI +." .812.0 rn•+C.1�E C�,TER / 1 + iE-sEr EILCnE o' 12- 24 iEaD D-: / �E• aOaLE J0-m L.S-30 . E-472 Iz __ I - OP -19 ._ 1,AK- 15 884 .05 rte_ 890.0 I II ' C I .. L E P. B 0.0 87/. 7 1._1 J _ I I rr IL r 1OP 13 - p 8;2D II / DP 27 I 8843 / BiB.O DP 6I Q, �IF 857.3 \� " 866.5 1� DP - II 8560 864.4 el DP -5 �� ,s• .� 836.3' �. �EP-3ti- 876.3 R/ V DP -4 � 8855.411 ; 817.2 874,8 L71.-7 1-12 879 B 'l. / 0_4�. ono D -O it II DP -1O 6480 DP\� 1 ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL 4Y -X FIG. +1 city of "eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate #: �- PUBLIC WEPARTMEry MASTER PLAN 7 1 � " sill ..w—•--. ...� .e 1 O' 1 ti•� \\ L_R•1 Driveway relocated& line up-with Corporate ter Dr _ APC Minutes June 24, 1986 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff'Roads, respectively. - 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. • 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. ® 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING S COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus, Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary plat on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, 95 5 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, and southeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive. It was pointed out by Chairman Harrison that the request actually was for four separate applications. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that proof of parking had been agreed upon. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus Corporation in addition to Tom Gaffney of Prism Hotels. An- historical presentation was provided in addition to a description of the proposed Compri Hotel. It was indicated that the proposed six -story hotel would actually be 20 feet lower than the existing Sperry building. The builder's architect was present to describe the plan, including berms and _sound abatement methods. Member Mulrooney indicated that the project and application should be considered as a whole in consideration of its b0ing in the nature of a planned development. Mulrooney then moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, conditional use permit, rezoning,, and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the following conditions where applicable to each of the requests: is 1. All standard platting and rezoning procedures shall be adhered to. 2. This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. 3. All signage code requirements shall be adhered to. 4. The trash area, perimeter parking shall be screened from public -streets. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plan materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the installation. 6. The total number of parking stalls shall be approved as the site plan demonstrates. 7. A separate liquor license shall be issued for the hotel's restaurant. 8. Lot 2 shall be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks b Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10. The main access drive to this site shall line up with Corporate Center Curve. 11. The two accesses into this development shall be separated by a minimum of 200 feet and be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 12. A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the Corporate Centre Drive right-of-way. 0 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single ® family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. ® Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning, to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. 1� Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986„ City Council Meeting Page Thirty PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING FOR CHATTERTON PONDS H. Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19:6 Acres and Rezoning from A to R -1--A public hearing was held at the last regular meeting of the APC to consider two (2) applications submitted by Robert Engstrom for a rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat entitled Chatterton Ponds. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the Plan- ning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pagesL:37Y through /<10 . For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page ( E_ .47L . The recommendations of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission ® are enclosed on page_. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R -L and preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT "CHATTERTON PONDS" APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM LOCATION: SW a, SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: A. AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING ® APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted re- questing a rezoning from an Agricultural to R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for "Chatterton Ponds". This development consists of 27 new lots and an existing home site on 19.06 acres located immediately south of St. John Neumann Church. ZONING & LAND USE: The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site R-1 (single family). -------Five --zoning --districts- -abutt - this -parcel: - Public Facilities --- (church) to the north, Agricultural west of Pilot Knob Road and to the northeast, Parks to the east, R-3 Townhouse (the "Pines") to the south and R-1 (Hilltop Estates) to the south. The existing home site, the Chatterton residence, is situated on a • knoll where one side falls towards Mooney Lake. This portion of the site is a grassy openland spotted with mature oak. The Chattertons have cows in this area also. Dense understory vegeta- tion, mature trees and ponding areas cover the rest of the site. Most of these trees are hardwood species and special care should be demonstrated to save as many as possible. A rather steep slope (3:1) to Mooney lake will require erosion control attention to assure that the water quality will not be affected. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 20 lots give this project an overall density of 1,47 units per acre, well within the Code requirement of 0 - 3 units/acre. All lots exceed the 12,000 S.F. minimum and range in size from 16,500 S.F. to 42,370 S.F. Variances will be required on lots 17, 18, 21, 22, 25 and 26 to allow less than 50' of frontage at the curb line as required by Code. This will provide access to home sites in areas where roadways are not feasible. /3v CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING: A single -divided access will serve this development from Pilot Knob Road near the center of the western property line. The original location was along the southern portion of the pond and was shifted south after a staff recommendation. By doing so, future development west of Pilot Knob Road could occur with the new streets aligning and without disturbing as much of the wooded area on that side of the road. Proposed Chatterton Road will loop to the east, south of a large ponding area and will then branch off to form two tear drop cul-de-sacs with islands. It is from these cul-de-sacs that the variance to the frontage requirements is necessary. The developer has shown building pad locations for lots 25 and 26 to ensure Code setback requirements are adhered to. This development will have an association for several reasons: 1) to maintain architectural control and unity within the project. • 2) to provide maintenance in "common areas" and in the cul-de-sac islands. 3) to have trash removal on a single, scheduled basis. 4) possibly for snow clearing. COMMENTS: The developer has met with the Parks Department several times to discuss parks issues and dedication requirements. An existing trail on the south side of Mooney Lake will be connected by a 30' pathway easement to the easternmost cul-de-sac. This will provide an uninterrupted pedestrian connection all the way to Patrick Eagan Park once the Mooney Lake elevation is lowered. A similar 30' trail easement from the western cul-de-sac to the undeveloped property to the north will allow pedestrian circulation as well as a potential emergency ingress/egress to the site. A road connection to the north appears unlikely due to the severity • of the slopes. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This proposed development incorporates the majority of the low lying drainage basins receiving surface water runoff from the property east of Pilot Knob Road between Deerwood Drive and Berry Ridge Road. This proposed development incorporates several knolls and side slopes surrounding the three internal drainage basins with the maximum elevation differential of approximately 35' occurring in the extreme northeast corner. All drainage runoff generated from this proposed development will be directed to the internal drainage basins (JP -36 and JP -35) which will be interconnected through a combination of surface drainage swales and underground storm sewer pipe. The ultimate discharge of these drainage basins is into Berry Patch Park and Mooney Lake (JP -7) to the east. With no positive outlet for Mooney Lake currently existing, it has exceeded its proposed future flood elevation and cannot accept anv additional runoff. X33 • CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 However, Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) is proposed to be upgraded during 1987. Part of this upgrading will require the development of these internal drainage basins and the permanent outlet for Mooney Lake towards Patrick Eagan Park to handle the runoff generated from this County road improvement. This storm sewer outlet to handle both Pilot Knob Road and this proposed development will be discussed under Project 473 which will have its public hearing held on July 15, 1986. If this project is approved, downstream storm sewer facilities will be adequate to handle this proposed development. This development will be responsible for all internal storm sewer laterals necessary to handle surface water runoff generated from this development and to intercept the surface water runoff from the Pines development located to the south. The final grading, drainage and utility plan shall show all storm sewer pipes constructed to the edge of existing or controlled water elevations, whichever is lower. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is immediately available adjacent to the south property line near Pilot Knob Road. Internal extensions of a sanitary sewer lateral system will adequately service all proposed lots. However, staff does not concur with the proposed lateral extension along rear lot lines adjacent to the north edge of Pond JP -35 to service Lot 16, 17 and 18 due to limited accessibility for preventative and corrective maintenance, as may be necessary. Each parcel should have its individual sewer service constructed to public right-of-way. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is located along Pilot Knob Road to service this proposed development through an internal lateral extension. ® STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing boundaries and severe topography of property adjacent to all three sides of this proposed development, and the location and configuration of the internal drainage basins, there is no other feasible alternative for development of this property without a -variance to the City's maximum cul-de-sac length ordinance (500'). Development boundary and topographic constraints result in the two cul-de- sacs and one bubble being necessary for reasonable development of this property. The staff has no objections to the proposed internal islands of each cul-de-sac subject to their development._ incorporating maintenance free landscaping. Final detailed design should be subject to staff's review and requirements. Access to Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) will be subject to approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. Its optimal location in relationship to minimizing impact for the McCarthy parcel across the road would result in the entrance being located approximately 300' north of the south boundary line. This 30' shift of the proposed center line will also better comply with the County's intersection spacing guidelines. CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 The proposed center island at the entrance from Pilot Knob Road should be eliminated. Also, although the internal streets are proposed to be publicly dedicated, they do not meet current ordinance requirements for width (26-28 vs. 34). These streets should be brought up to City standards if they are to be publicly dedicated. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: Sufficient drainage and ponding easements should be dedicated for the internal drainage basins adequate to protect the necessary ponding storage volume requirements and interconnecting storm sewer systems. The configuration of these drainage easements will be determined upon submission of final detailed plans for review by the Engineering Division. If the standard street width requirements are maintained, staff is recommending that the public right-of-way dedication be 60' in lieu of the proposed 50' width. 10 The staff concurs with the proposed 30' pathway easements from the terminal cul-de-sac to Mooney Lake with the, final alignment being approved by City staff. Sufficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road shall be dedicated as required by Dakota County to facilitate the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the ._,final plat for all frontage along Pilot Knob Road on either side of the proposed street access point All other internal drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by City ordinance and/or final detail plan submittal and reviewed by City staff. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer and water have been previously assessed on all the land proposed to be developed under this subdivision. Trunk Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed under Project 473, which will have its public hearing on July 15. However, the proposed assessment under this project does not take into consideration the proposed development into single-family lots. Subsequently, significant credits have been calculated under the "large lot" policy which would be voided under this proposed development. Therefore, as a condition of final plat approval, this development shall agree to assume its trunk area storm sewer assessments based on a single family development. Appropriate credit will be given for any related assessment that may be approved under Project 473. /36 CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 5 This development has not paid its related lateral benefit assessments from the existing 27" trunk ,sanitary sewer along the south and west boundary of this plat or the 12" trunk water main along Pilot Knob Road when they were originally installed. Therefore, this development shall accept these postponed assessment obligations'a's a condition of final plat approval based on the rates in affect. These amounts are estimated as follows: Storm Sewer To be determined based on final plat area calculations and ponding credits. Sanitary Sewer ® 580'+300'-150' (corner lot credit) = 730' @ $14.35/FF = $10,475.50 :. (Proj. 88II) Water 1/2 (600') @ $11.88/FF $ 3,564.00 (Proj. 24A) _.......__.__..._With the restricted_ access being dedicated to Pilot Knob Road _ other than the public street access, there will be no assessment associated with the Pilot Knob Road upgrading. Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to discuss these concerns in -further detail with the Planning ® Commission or City Council at the appropriate meetings for formal review and approval. TAC/ jj CHATTERTON PONDS PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60' in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accomodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the • installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. __.........__.___8._.____The ,.Pilot -Knob--Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) be removed prior to buildin� permit.issuance. 11. Park dedication fees & trail issues be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. /37 • • u5 Ai FLCo 4YIN, All r ! Cr[ ll E ION S r lun [On Wp V6pMl-r LA L FIpIY r X L•'b �IIJ� CfFTF � a WIMOCST g PAARK ty� rrtF /122 •.1 _ j u'� GGIM Y. f�F y I�i- ,,J• H;������� © ntire4�:0 /3g"/ \\ , � s WnN+a. ari o�.d,• ~• 6 ��\�9iflis � �•f .�•°`; /�-., � �p ............ h:A / 41.9 .mss•= / 299 639y 11 ', .—i6, 1908>Qh. ' .✓' � . 2. 1 � . 3. Q PON I J9,935._ .uv" _ C 3.50 Wh` - _ � /rJ .{.' , \\. 1,• �....° / llZ) 4. �-)9.40 N � � 4.7 9.11. 1 /us -- - .,t� ��� :I1;( - ♦ - - / e e L. 3 lea n ��'•"'� - - i'4 -9-ee 5-27 l Roh.l Fne1l Bti/; Wl�Elpm _ _ \\ 16131991-1001 1 � r�i i irlar Pla GROSS QIJARE F OTAGE Site. 830,362.5 sq.ft. - 19.06 Acres Total Las: 724,410 Number of Las: 28 Density, 1.47 D.U. per Acre _ • fl CP 12 ;SI' wGP'-1�` I�' .' �� 8930 -- - �I 8296 or. 825.0 1 a 11- j�l / . D d�'.�B976 Er_� 829, ), i -i � DP 22 ' P 11 -66� 6921 ~ 8800871 800 � :w 'J -d I. -i V 1 . \\ ll,li JP_3 .�.JP-67 JP=13 CP- I I I 847.2 .871 0 1 :869 0 795.0 JP 2 8412 c I BBO.O 7 6 , 90 808./ \ III w I'8454.,0he{J 11 ti / Il I r JP 15 .JB492 J' o �0�'1.15/1' ._24.6965 1085/.3 I6 3. HILL5I I\ / `- 1 J c JP -II 8157 8300 926.0 24 . 171...'SBP-1 II JP -51 -- 7903 8010 II JP -5 _ - 823,8 834,0 ;�H04K 27 P4HM. 1 I BP -2 J-ee i 792.3 / 1.0 111` HO/.O BP -29 I�BOO 8097 °d 1100/ j/. ria 6 1 \ a/B.b � BP 33..'e 9 BP -28 8626 1 1 s 895.2- e660 49 ` Q'_ !Y J ._ R -B - BP -3 36 �1 /B 889. 9 903.2 / 99 // B P-35 _____1 8-c 908.0 /.I: 920.2�1 Jp- 2'.-._._ BP -25 N- BP -4 r 872 Cal=. 8 4 844.0 CI r! 1 r nalL I j 5n0 r 3. 61P 8189 8300 JP W 11-F Y 81 83 P-36--,-- ---C/ 970,6 JP -3 1 5 9142, 869.4 859 4 .ICH 872.4 6652 /'I �w 924.0 1 874.2 SP -2\ s'I 9272 BB6.5 882,1 B-sj!2O cl 886.0 �- -e w I ___8P-24' -:N I Bp-,5- 9180 P=S 9180 874 5 923 % \ ' I 886,5 I J \ B -d s 16 ;,BP -17 I I �P �J ,/ �+ -. -892.0 1 N LP- .5 931 33l/ 4 I 1 840.5 9323 vI h BP -B I �. � 8500. sB 27 BP- 1 IE11i.;E- -i. L6.-2 U .. .'4 BP -I6 --�- l..w 8989 `�-; rullalr 90// 955.0 858.0 DP -11 d r Hk ee99412 _.2 D N. rz 'DP -25 'II(.rt ion 0-886.4 it VI?CC '892.0. _ ��� JP -45 5 JP -62 It 6913 893.0 8955 �, JP 44 ' 8907 48957 =\4 J_p I Jf r J 9 _.:... A n a -f JP -30 8730 879,4 Jzi r ; a�. _. J 23 30.0� -tl U FA Vic O, U F -RM LP -93 \I 8511 853 B Ll L d I'. 6 ] b -_ Ib L.4 LP 54 888.0., Ji ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL uJP-29 926.0 9450 JP -51 -- 9760 J-ee I�BOO JP -2B ria 6 JeI _969.4 .I �= !Y J �1 99 1898 (6 'N.L9UT �� FIG. #1 city of eagan STORMS WER approved: plate #tl PUBLIC _ � WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 r' 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • preliminary plat and rezoning to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. A(/ 7 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (.TP -7) has been ordered by Council action. B. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. It was also recommended that the staff plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. All voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the ® request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of McCoombs, Knutson was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. �% //`7-Y 8 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1'' FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 11, 1986 RE: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIONS REGARDING CHATTERTON POND At the Commission meeting on July 10, 1986, the Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. Commission members had made an on-site visit to the site to review and investigate the topography of the area, to determine if the trail connection between the proposed plat, and Berry Ridge Park to the east could be made. After their reviewal and discussion, the Commission made the following recommendations: 1. That a cash dedication requirement be required for all lots. 2. Trailway on Pilot Knob Road be the responsibility of this development. 3. That a five foot bituminous path be developed connecting the easterly most cul-de-sac to the east boundary of the plat, connectable to the trailway in Berry Ridge Park. --------4. -That the developer bench in a trail bed two feet above the normal pond elevation, and provide a trail easement through proposed lot 24 to that portion of Berry Patch Park now inaccessible. Should you have any questions regarding the Commission's recommendations, please feel free to contact me. KV/bls i40 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-one PRELIMINARY PLAT/TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE I. Preliminary Plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by New Horizon Homes for a 60 unit townhouse project located on approximately 14 acres and described as Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights. The APC is recommending. approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages-49-6 • through /5/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to page s) 1,e The original Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; therefore, there are no additional recommendations. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny preliminary plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake., /W U SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT, 'THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE' NEW HORIZON HOMES OUTLOT C, THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS, NW 1/4,.SEC.,28 R-3 IN THE BLACKHAWK P.D. JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 6, 1986 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. ZONING AND LAND USE: Outlot C is surrounded by the recently approved Deerfield Apartments to the north, Thomas Lake Heights quads to the east, the Highline Trail to the south and an un- developed R-4 district to the west. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as a mixture of Parks (P) and Mixed Residential (R-2) with a density of 3-6 units/acre. The site has steep slopes and drains primarily into a pond on the southern portion of the site ani off-site to the east. SITE PLANNING: Clemson Drive will be continued west for approxi- mately 200 feet and then proceed north forming Beacon Hill Court. All of the quadraminium buildingsl exceed the 30 foot front yard setback and have more than the 30 feet between buildings which -.-..was required. -in .. the . Thomas Lake freplat. in .1983.. .Clemson Drive continues west to the property line where a temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed until development in the R-4 district occurs. The Williams Brothers Pipeline easement extends 40 feet into this plat along the eastern property line. There are no setback problems. ® Each quad unit will be served by two private entry drives most of which are 14' wide. Code requires 1 indoor parking space and one outdoor space for each unit. This is provided ,with the parking area in front of each garage. COMMENTS: This development will have an association to control trash pickup and maintain the common areas. The architectural styling/color of the buildings will be the same as that in the Thomas Lake Heights Addition. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and should need little or no revisions. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: This development incorporates a section of land with considerable variations in topography and elevation with the maximum differential of approximately 40' in the center of the plat. Approximately the northern two-thirds of this development will direct its surface drainage to the northeast into the drainage basin within the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition which is ultimately connected through a series of storm sewers to the system within Thomas Lake Road. The lower third of this development will direct its surface water runoff to the THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE „ JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 south into the Highline Trail drainage basin Pond BP -6. This southerly drainage basin currently receives runoff from the Mallard Park and Woodgate Additions and does not have an outlet presently available. A future outlet would be provided through the installation of a storm sewer lift station and force main discharging into Thomas Lake Road. However, at the present time, this drainage basin is able to handle all current drainage and anticipated future runoff from this lower third portion of the proposed Trails of Thomas Lake Addition without requiring the installation of this outlet. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing topography and property line constraints, it is not feasible to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac to the north. This cul-de-sac will require a variance due to its length exceeding the maximum 500' allowed by City Code. Clemson Drive is proposed to be a continuation from the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition eventually connecting to Johnny Cake Ridge Road through the future development of the Wilmus property to the west. The center line of Clemson Drive is shown • approximately 625' north of the south line to allow its extension to Johnny Cake Ridge Road to conform to the proposed future parkland dedication associated with the development of the Wilmus property. This stub street portion of Clemson Drive will have to have a full right-of-way and cul-de-sac constructed until such time that the adjacent properties develop to allow its continuation. The staff supports the proposed configuration of the cul-de-sac street and Clemson Drive intersection which will help to provide continuity but yet discourage through -traffic due ---to the turning movement -.required. Staff recommends that the name "Beacon Hill Court" be changed to avoid confusion with the Beacon Hill Subdivision located south of Cliff Road. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been stubbed to the east property line of this proposed subdivision to be extended upon a future development such as this. Althought the western boundary represents the major drainage district divide for sanitary sewer, it is recommended that the sanitary sewer lateral be extended to the west property line to provide maximum flexibility for future development of the unplatted property and park land to the west. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is availabe to handle this proposed development with the lateral extension through this property. With the development of the Thomas Lake Heights Addition, a water main stub has been provided in the northeast corner to be picked up by this proposed development through the cul-de-sac for proper looping and fire protection which is not shown on the preliminary utility plans submitted. The water lateral should be stubbed to the west property line to provide for future extension and continuity of the water system. Other details associated with the installation of sanitary, storm sewer and water main must meet the current City engineering standards at the time of final plan review and approval as a part of the final plat process. / THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The drainage and ponding easement of sufficient size and storage volume shall be dedicated over the southern portion of this plat necessary to meet the requirements of the Master Storm Sewer Plan for drainage basin BP -6. The final alignment and configuration of this easement will be defined at the time of final plat approval. All other internal utility line easements will be defined after final engineering review of utility plans and shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. All other public right-of-way dedication meets the City Ordinance and engineering requirements for this type of subdivision. However, additional right-of-way or roadway easement will have to be conveyed to the City to accomodate the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac at the western end of Clemson Drive. • ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed under Projects #88, 237 and 256, respectively. No new additional assessments are required as a condition of final plat approval. However, all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision and its future extension to the west boundary line will be the entire responsibility of this subdivision. - -Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to -- discuss any aspect of this report during the review process before the Planning Commission and/or City Council. `/' 7 THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de- sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance must be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. S. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be • dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff - subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". -9. This "plat—shalr-be sutr3ect-to-all:-standard plat conditions. ---' - 7 0 0 x N w�.M. 6.nn (.I— On fill UP -61 - _ DEVELOOYIFNT SUMMARY 7REUMINPRY LANDSCAPE/GF?SE CE`/aopr' soN �sson.*es.lxe TNF- TRAILS OF THOMAS LAk 0 Ul J 1w 1 1 NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. "q PLANT -jCHEOULE On fill UP -61 - _ DEVELOOYIFNT SUMMARY 7REUMINPRY LANDSCAPE/GF?SE CE`/aopr' soN �sson.*es.lxe TNF- TRAILS OF THOMAS LAk 0 Ul J 1w 1 1 NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. "q C I ry ;1 Ai '-�AK HALL 27- P 3i K N 7 80316 11 1 14 A -k 807 6 2.3 r'A d �54' NO"; � 8 AP - BP -29 VIPAI;E 797 3 K j 097 600 6 0- 8/80 -ccc a A P 8189 856 6 3P 8663 .9300 en -o'3 2 36 3-b SK -A. JP-36f��— US IR 4;`QvE G'� 8706'JP-35 jp- 873 Z -Ik - 1 8694 :8 5, j. L37F-'mc, 36 12 "P�1872.4 i F,7 EIP-35 9052 JP -4 L'Al 908,0 -37 72 87,40,=pj2"., A'P 9202 J P 00 7 8 A- PTO 8P-4 875, pE r 86 6 3 BP -25 874 2 924 0 BP2 886 88�' I I ; LP -6 88 AP -35 8006 B-4� 8665 t A 4 3 A 711 3-k -SP-24 BP. 5 _7! 45 AP -51 921 Z' 6865 4 87 A P -7 0 1 1 � . I L 889.2 B -a 1. ;. . :I o- 89 894T3, ��a 85 89J.9 'J/AP-�8 39 00 N / 9 -42 I -m fT LP 840.5 BP. 18 0 931 3 9323 3829 LIF 24 2 d j AP- 12 91 9"o 9 196 E 89� 3 S--27 9P B 88 C BP -1 M 8960 1 9/0,! 8736 8820 8 1 'P t A 2? P-43 'P 0 t 7 1048 B!, 5,,,o 12' Is' L AP -26 3-e 5 8 BP -11 BP 883 5 L. S.-3 BP -20 LP -5 8866 2 9 6990 .-897( 9160 9 NA 900.4 01 AP'23 T:�j F 9200 889 3 -'r-K BP -13 7� wil r AP -49 j �00 0 H. .921 4 i; 881 7 PIAP-40 -: 9270 J 27'ap.8 I3P-X .915 0 3-K :T'� 6890 '2. AP -11, i 912A .15 92 0 8. A905,2 9' 00 7j '6 -21 6"9060 �P 5 91H if t 1� 'Ma -, 01 1 AP -50 88 --L ; EIP 7' F 88 b 9M� I I 886,0 9 8, 1 26.0 8940 8950 '5 �9040 . A dd7—, 7.4 BP -I 16 12 21- <bBP-31 90810. Z. �j l� 0 - -15 9 14�0 0 A V 9 I AI 9 7.6 BP -34 9082 �-14 BP -32. 988.0 914.0 912 1 lk 9 a 10060 933.9 T E DR. ' �Iq AP -44 193 937.6 jr LP -5 1 7 t r 3T 915.9 L,S -211--'� 9180 911.0 . I � i' I I One., A 9 0 - 13.� , " 4 PARK% AP 2, GOL Is 0 t COUR V P-48 '."i 6 AP -16 -21A LP- I 204 I 4GOITAON AGII�T, r 920,15 b L S,-20 020 1 89 9Z3.5 �AP L 8 926,0 -15 ; I 1 9340) IS 088 1 AP /5.0 K 926.2, 5 91 L 925 LP -56 93Z )D 9R 3 ................ Q BJECT PARCEL u ................ ................ ................ ............... /071 FIG. +1 / a a Is e., -P m a- -s city of eagan pproved-: standard - STORM SEWER plate PUBLIC WORKS MEN] 2 DEPART MASTER PLAN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. 8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building - permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. It was also recommended that the staff plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. -- A11'voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. - --- THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of McCoombs, Knutson was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed- utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. /6Z 8 d APC Minutes June 24, 1986 l 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or . Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. • All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project.. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of ® Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. F: 1 J: \1Y- 40 Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. Secretary - APC 0 111614 E Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/PARK FOREST APARTMENTS J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres and Rezoning from A (Agricultural to R-4 (Multiple) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986 APC meeting, to consider a rezoning application from A to R-4 and a preliminary plat for a 420 unit apartment complex as submitted by Earl Jespersen. The APC is recommending denial of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering reports found on pages /::� through AZ/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to page( 16 -5 - The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash dedication and trailway on Federal Drive. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON 'THIS STEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-4 and the preliminary plat for Park Forest Apartments as presented. lye/ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: DESIGN COLLECTIVE (EARL JESPERSEN) PARK FOREST APARTMENTS LOCATION: S.E. 1/4, SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by The Design Collective requesting a rezoning of a 32 acre A (Agricultural) parcel to R-4 (Multiple) and a preliminary plat for 420 Apartment units. This site is located west of Federal Drive and 35E in the SE 1/4 of Section 16. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as R-1 (Single Family) and R-2 (Mixed Residential). Therefore, an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be required. ------ ZONING -AND -LAND USE: -- -This - development is - surrounded by ---agri- cultural (A) land to the north, 35E to the east, Blackhawk Glen (R-1) to the west and the northernmost portion of the Blackhawk Planned Development. This P.D. has both R-3 and R-4 districts bordering the .proposed apartment project. An undeveloped portion of the Blackhawk Hills single family development is to the immediate ® southwest of the site. The topography is rolling with knolls and depressions. Existing vegetation consisting primarily, of elm, cottonwood and popler is scattered, often found in the depressed areas. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 420 units give the project an overall density of 13.13 units/acre. Code requires that the minimum setback shall be increased by 1 foot for each foot of height over 35 feet. The building on the NW is shown approximately 30 feet from the Pacific Avenue R.O.W. where a 50 foot setback along a public street is required. Building sections and elevations have not been submitted but staff was told that these buildings would be similar in scale to the Lemay Lake Apartments. Therefore, this building would need to be moved to the south to meet code compliance. This may also be the case on the northeastern most building that is 50 feet from the property line. All other setbacks meet code requirements. The 420 units will require 420 indoor parking stalls included with the rent in order to provide the 420 10, x 20' outdoor spaces being proposed. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING/LANDSCAPING: The six dwelling buildings are serviced by two main divided entries from Federal Drive on the east and south and by a single access from Pacific Avenue on the north. The drives converge to the center of the site (south of the pond) where the 3,000 S.F. clubhouse is situated. Amenities located in this area include a spa for 10 people, 2 outdoor raquetball courts and 2 tennis courts. The Parks and Recreation Department will require a trailway along Federal Drive for the entire length of the project along with a cash dedication fee. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted by an out of state architect that will need to be strongly upgraded to meet City standards. On multifamily projects, one - tree per unit is the minimum standard. This would allow for performance standards enabling the City to require a more dense screening from roads, parking areas, trash enclosures and especially different adjacent land uses. Building heights and landscape plans submitted on proposed grading plans are necessary to provide adequate buffering. Existing trees should be carefully located in an effort to save as many as possible. The detailed plan required for final plat approval should be done by a landscape architect familiar with native species. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the developer submitted for this development is feasible. The applicant does, however;, propose on filling some of Pond JP -2 .which ° is located at-.-- ---- the north end of this proposed project as shown on Figure 1. This pond is designated as a future City detention pond in the Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The developer has shown on the preliminary grading plan that he can provide the necessary ponding area by reshaping the pond somewhat. Before the City can approve the final plat for this development, 40 the City must authorize the. project to construct the outflow pipe from Pond JP -2. The City installed a portion of this pipe under 35-E during its construction. The portion west of Federal Drive to Pond JP -2 and the portion east of 35-E to Pond JP -3 remain to be constructed. UTILITIES: City Project 432 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer through the middle of this development to provide service to the Royal Oaks Addition immediately north of this proposed development. The sewer is deep enough and of adequate size and capacity to provide service to this development. A 30" trunk water main will be brought to the northwest corner of this proposed development. This water ,main is being constructed under City Project 451. The contractor will complete this work this summer. /6�6 PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 With this development, staff recommends extending this 30" trunk water main to Federal Drive. From there it can easily be put across the freeway because the City had the casing pipe installed with the Interstate construction. This line can then tie into an existing 30" line within Duckwood Drive, west of Pilot Knob Road. Figure 2 shows how the completion of this water main fits with the City's Comprehensive Trunk Water Main Plan. Staff recommends the Council not approve the final plat for this development until the Council authorizes the installation of the 30" trunk water main. Also according to the City's Master Plan, the 8" water line proposed within this development should be- brought to the southwest corner of this development to connect to an existing 8" line servicing the Blackhawk Hills Additions. This, along with a 30" line, will complete the City's trunk water system west of 35- E in this area. ® STREETS: Federal Drive borders this proposed development along the east with Blackhawk Road bordering this development along the south. Pacific Avenue will be brought to the northwest corner of this development with the platting of the Hampton Heights Addition. Both Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road are built to their ultimate design sections. Staff has no problems with the two access points proposed. Both appear to have adequate sight distance. The developer proposes -- -- on extending Pacific Avenue about 500' east. The extension of Pacific Avenue will require a 30' easement from the property to the north.- Because this street is proposed to temporarily deadend, the City will require the construction of a temporary turn -around. In the future, this street could connect to Violet Lane. ® This development is responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk along Federal Drive, its west property line. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The only right-of-way necessary for this development to dedicate is a 30' half right-of-way for Pacific Avenue. MnDOT acquired the right-of-way for Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road with its I -35E right-of-way acquisition. It may be necessary for this development to dedicate an additional 5' of right-of-way for the sidewalk along Federal Drive. At this writing, staff has not been able to determine the right-of-way for Federal Drive becuase it was included with the I -35E right-of-way acquisition. The City will require the dedication of a ponding easement over Pond JP -2 encompassing the 852 high water elevation. The City will also require a 20' utility easement over the storm sewer outflow line from Pond JP -2 and a 20' utility easement over the 8" and 30" water main. /5� PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 Also, as a condition of final plat approval, this development will be required to obtain the necessary street easements for Pacific Avenue and its turn -around from the property to the north. PERMITS: This development will require permits from the Minnesota Department of Health for water main extension. Also, a sanitary sewer extension permit from MPGA will be required. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the City's assessment records, staff found that this development is responsible for trunk water area assessment and upgrading the trunk area storm sewer assessment from single family to multifamily because of the proposed R-4 use. This development will also be responsible for the lateral benefit from trunk water main assessment resulting from the 30" trunk water main construction as shown on Figure 3. The following table summarizes these assessment obligations of this development. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd 1986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Area Water 27.2 $1,190/Ac. $32,370 Trunk Storm Sewer Upgrade 1,186,140 (1) 0.014/sq.ft. (2) 16, Lateral Benefit 618 11.88/f.f. 7,340 from Trunk Water — (1) Net area total. (2) Multi -family - single family rate. All costs for the installation of all, internal utilities, except possibly for trunk storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility of this development. ��0 PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: 1. This development shall provide the amount of storage volume for Pond JP -2 as required by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. 2. Final plat approval cannot occur until Council authorizes the installation of the trunk storm sewer line outlet, the 30" trunk water main, and the B" trunk water main loop to Federal Drive, unless the applicant wishes to install any portion of these utilities under private contract. 3. The development shall dedicate a 30' right -o£ -way for Pacific Avenue and be responsible for obtaining the northerly 30' and turn -around easement for Pacific Avenue. 4. This development shall be responsible for obtaining Minnesota Department of Health, MnDOT and MPCA permits. ® 5. Staff shall approve any phasing plans. 6. This development shall be responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk, and a 5' right-of-way if necessary, along Federal Drive to the west edge of this plat. 7. A detailed landscape plan submitted on a grading plan with the final plat submission. A bond shall be submitted and not released until one year after the installation. 8. All standard plat conditions be adhered to. 15f 0 C L2 e �. FGVD JP-2 ••war. �\ rv.v.... «....«� I[��p. \ I�I\\ —_/� / T 3 °` _� _ ,r•� _ Ig iS � _ FlR9f il101 E1Lv �.Is l�� j - '// Z ..FlR]T AGG<F1.EV •COO �'/ / �,�i \' [ f� .' /^_ � / �I RTw BLACKF-IAWK RTMENTS -3 _ .._ ;,:.. COLLECTIVE I /Cp-10 P,01,0 I , eIDGE /,V :;: , J 0 COMSER 765.0 P-2 801? 0 8748 874-8 Auc C-h- j / CP 7 23.5 7 9.7 ENl Ic "EWHT�Lr . . .......... Dpo�.. ADD 2 F' CP CIP SW5 8 8296 6 C'- I 1 25 0 17.06 1 EC A-b CP Pj r 196, 806.0 871�O -892. AP - 27 . A C -- 7963 --17 8800 1-7802.4 CE%-U, ci:n c. JP-3 -.p� Tj 4r%/'r6. 24 -67 844.0 IL 1 187010 F -bb CP-II 9 7f. 95.0 0 y 630 8472 8 0 6 1117W j 8492 AP 65t 3 16, FIS:i . .84 3 �I;ITIPO;300 4 - 8398 L1- 8025 T:- T : 15 T 4, P 4b J cP 8440 AP-5 -.,8L 846.5 790.3 .11 1- P N:, 01.0 I 24P• 5 834.0 CITY ?r 11.ACKHA-VK PARK Kf� P,$7 27" HALL 036 ... !1 07 3P-2 7 JP-10 r. A-1 8 8208 SP-29uL ry 830,0 '1 444T �!Ell J-1 809 7 818.0 AP- 2 .) tI,L' ) I ;II I .O� JP 6 P'6 U66,36 I , , . 13, 8P-28 8189 i�j �:. . �i . - 8 !JP-49 BP 33 86668' .01 i I , 30 S -.IiLIE I 1 818. 8860 48- 8-1b i7 H95.2' --36P "\7 018, 8706 JP- 79 4 830,0 a5 -6694 ap-32r.872,4 Is', Ij 889 9 86.52 -35 905,2 - 90810Bc JP4 Jrs�P-8 PA q.?0 2 j 37 7,40 819.S P 8 .0. 830. 1.8.90.6 SP-25 A P Al /,J�- - U ( '875 87 P-4 74.2 924,0 5 8 9272 6 3: 1 AP-)35 LP 88( 6 8555 00 kJ�i: 6 �2 c s -AZA,IE>l B - k P. II --AP-511 77 1- B P - 24 f. BP:5 I ... \P-7 1 .1H'. gU I gl I-,,A T, 8 9A, 38 4.� r 8 6.5 846 LP-43 I II/A10.0 R,-, 85J.. -L. , - ; 851 1 EIP-17 853.8 1 '88987.1 L - P 42 R.0 ;q ;,-840.5 z 8SO,O mP tl ?2 orp . mL Itj - v 937.3 3i90a8820 BP 16 1R�LS- 27 l I '.BP I 'i III I T j ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ ................ roges+ FIG. #1 city of eagan approved: standard STORM SEWER plate #: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN s FI li: I I / 27. 7/540 �� I' ]90/ ••A �AOM EIEIA 82020 16. 6•IB i_ 3BIMS Nyl0 2.0aW5 4� .1 45B/ 12 � "... . r.. L. 950 I`:iL 1 16• s9.o 45 ?5 ✓64 MAvj / NS b!'al Rx/ 192 43 O:5 Al. 0, 40 40 993/1170ELEVATED STORAGE q / \ 640/ -10 jN.w L. 1059 t 14,,I' 3 E All �7I- 57flI[IF71, 9• X72 // INpUm' i24PN �/ --II—_ 8• 7] 69.3/840 J 551/];.0 I J� 10• r ra / v L I� �� 6" Eoz I" I; �I 71 d�ig///ISO .r. 'Iz' 0� /Zn 8]68A060� 6J 9/80.0-.I '� i MIDGE �.j - 16• JjJ•xx // I GI 2)930 5].9/]30 463/620 4 4/6711 �' 19 / 62 12" 79 16.i B• '20• '76 . _20• 75 79 04 ' ! 20.•x •:.�r -r � - / Go 7/ a69B8 ]/ '• �� // 61.0 950 80 1060 )8 TREATMENTI 68.8/840 PLANT [r_ II I.T 0 i / ' LI: II U24Gp7 O ll GH 6 SITE /% )0 J/ / �O ISI 1 .,. II 291 'r • 0.' 710/890 91 915.1/92.0 !,!G f (5TL 2ND ,,;/ 16! r 56.2/6]. l - - O. �. 63 —� 950 90 li 30I T ----I 1 �= -RIAL alil, IS. 864/ 92 69.5/e{0 84 600'® 6 ®1050 1U __T _ 55]/)00 603/]HLOi NNOD I t \ /740 Bn 6 12 93 60.4/78.0 � 1_68118310/ 0� 103 I� 24" �IIf, IDGEVIE;W Ll 1. •� 4�� �j^��w�' % / ; 30 566/42CENT ENTE``OB 969/614 1 .Q°65.0/650 r, 11 C: 16 1+. Lit TV_')847/980 •••.•:'• � i L 87 104'u-�B�nO�!45' �Au •• U_FE 91 75 107 p L "y IS. 9 Lr5fi 0i ° a'1�i.' II ' -.•i\ i }f:;}:{ 6 r P 595 ,' LS I 11,1 86 73.3/74.0 950 lLLTO f FISH ACNH, 7/N - ... G� I - L- L n 1E—�_1 595/ AP593/ 6 +I J 1 � 1 9 / /•� ��1 ]s o 76 0 I MILL$ ' 122 I T' -- 16 - 1 - i_1 69.7/ 700 - 7/l %801/1020 643/84.0 \\BL� t III 1 Crt I _ 13269}%f6 p° �cE�I. Po/ /, 1 111 rmll� I,. ,.1 �ll 4l I IfnT.,i t AV 1 Ixn4 99 !� 56,2/]20 6 �r-�I% 1 ♦� -�ij— 1.. 11LACNHAJ/N — �C4ke i 105 53.2 /fi80 111 (/ 106 f~ 7,r% LIL_ ( PARK-- r� N .S FJc_�f1]./.GIO 90 129 570(10 0 �`�f� i r YCQO r000HAVE11 / 75�1�j'J i 16 `}'�{AI //- �1{�� /J✓'i PAAN GI/iS / �111. V � • 14 1l ADTC�'T �/ '1�� I6�N YOALE 11 AD I- --(C bl l%]201 L� ' .�-..._,N0 2 I[ y/(�� tI /µ I l j 126 51.}/67p / -���• 4-�'1 I J �� 123 121— 18. .� SKovnAlk%tiE 1 �� Iril Ll rl_ 127 r__ ���� 12 �O�44i N I.I�t .': I�: �- 99"�4��19•_/✓ 526/67.0, /X�—; 110059 9175,,,Q1 I]] SUBJECT PARCEL "Rae -- FIG. *3 City of eagan WATER approved: standard PUBLIC plate ##: WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT 1_ATE%Al ',FjdE�IT 'r,RoM _ Z Y APC Minutes June 24, 1986 Ir 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all 2f the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig. of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west • of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. C Secretary - APC DGK Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three JADDITIONAL ITEMS SOUND LEVEL METER PROGRAM A. League of Minnesota Sound Level Meter Program --On at least two (2) occasions, the City Council has given consideration to the purchase of a noise sound meter. On one occasion there was interest expressed in purchasing a noise meter for the purpose of monitoring airport noise and more recently, there is discussion regarding acquisition of a noise meter for monitoring the Sperry semiconductor facility. The high cost for a noise meter was a reason in both cases as to why a sound meter program was not established. A second • reason related to potential liability if the noise meter is used as an enforcement device. It would be necessary to have an employee properly trained if the results of the noise meter are to be used as reason for enforcing ourrnoise ordinance. The City has an environmental noise ordinance and with the growing number of complaints related to noise compatibility, Administrative Assistant Hohenstein was asked to research available sound meter programs and also address the liability factor if the noise meter were to be used by City staff in an effort to enforce the noise _ordinance. The League of Minnesota Cities has a sound meter program which is available to the City and is explained in the attached memo prepared by Administrative Assistant Hohenstein, found on pages —167 through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny implemen- tation of the sound meter program through the League of Minnesota Cities. 11G5�; MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: JULY 8, 1986 SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES SOUND METER PROGRAM Pursuant to our conversations, I have investigated the availability of sound level analyzing equipment. The purpose of this memo is to outline briefly the information that was gathered and possible alternatives for City action. The incidence of circumstances under which a sound level meter might be used in the City of Eagan are apparently increasing. These circumstances include a number of citizen complaints regarding the enforcement of the City's Environmental Noise Ordinance, complaints about ® traffic noise, requests for studies of noise compatibility for developments, and the increasing level of aircraft noise. Currently, it is neccesary to request special studies of the MPCA to enforce or study any of these items. In the past, the City Council has expressed concern that the conduct of noise studies might tend to increase the City's liability to law suit. I have.contacted a number of noise experts including Dave Kelso of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Tom Duffy of the National Organization to Insure Sound ---------------Controlled Environment,- John Nelson of the City of Bloomington and the Metrosonics Corporation. None are aware of precedent cases which hold a city liable for noise simply because it has conducted studies about its presence or level. In fact, there is a possibility that the new state noise standards may place a liability on cities for allowing land uses which are noise ® incompatible with those already in place. While the League of Minnesota Cities continues to oppose this rule and lobbying efforts may result in its amendment, the City may be best served if it is able to anticipate noise levels through the use of a meter before approving certain uses. Purchase prices and capacities for such equipment vary widely. A hand held unit from Larson -Davis Laboratories costs roughly $1,300. The Metrosonics sound level analyzer lists for $10,000. Electronic Design Company, Bruel and Kjaer and Quest Electronics all have equipment priced somewhere between. Obviously so great a diversity in equipment and cost implies a need for an expanded level of expertise in the sound analysis business before good decisions can be made on capital expenditures. For this reason, it may be advisable for the City to take part in the League of Minnesota's Sound Meter Program. The League purchased a number of 3M Model 3220 sound level meters with the intention of making them available to member cities at a nominal fee to conduct sound analysis. To date, response has been low and the League is willing to distribute them to cities on a loan basis without financial obligation except for unnecessary wear and tear. A copy of the custody agreement for such equipment is attached for your review. The City may have the equipment for up /6 7 Sound Meter Program July 8, 1986 Page 2 to 18 months without charge and may renew the loan agreement at that time. The PCA also makes available training for City staff who may be assigned to conduct measurements with the equipment. The The training is conducted by MPCA staff member Dave Kelso and City of Bloomington staff member John Nelson. It is conducted as a portion of the Minnesota Police Officers Skills Training program. Initial training time commitments require only a couple of hours and subsequent training can be modified to fit specific interests. Because the nature of the complaints- described above varies widely, it may be advisable for representatives of several City Departments including Inspections, Planning, Police and Engineering to undertake the training. The availability of a sound level analyzer and the training in its use will allow the City staff to become familiar with the operation of such equipment and allow for more informed decisions if we were to consider purchase of such equipment in the future. Please inform me if you have any questions concerning this matter. Alnistrative Assistant Enclosure JDH/jeh In Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Item 1.. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicols Road) --On February 18, 1986, the public hearing was closed and the project approved for the upgrading of Nicols Road from Kings Road to Beau D Rue Drive under the above referenced contract. Also, the preparation of the detailed plans and specifi- cations were also ordered. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their information, review, approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bid solicitation. The major concern regarding the upgrading of this road, besides the proposed assessments, dealt with the width and location of the trailway. The Council had directed Staff to meet with the property owners once final plans had been prepared and the proposed location of the trailway could be accurately located 1 in the field. Enclosed on page 7 is a memo regarding the results of that meeting. Also, it should be noted that Staff designed the road improvement on Nicols Road north of Diffley Road to offset the proposed road improvement as far to the west as possible to minimize the impact of the trailway construction — and to maintain as much boulevard green space as possible.- Also, ossible. Also, because of the changeover in engineering personnel, these plans were not able to be completed until recently. Subsequently, the estimated construction timetable requires that only the southerly half (Kings Road to Cedar Ridge Circle) be initiated .this year with the north half (Cedar Ridge Circle to Beau D Rue Drive) beginning during the spring of 1987. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail these plans at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 86-2 (Nicols Road) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Thursday, August 14, 1986. A;f MEMO TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: TRAILWAY NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR NICOLS ROAD CITY PROJECT 460, CITY CONTRACT 86-2 On Tuesday afternoon, July 8, 1986, I met with seven out of fourteen of the property owners noticed who are impacted by the proposed trailway along Nicols Road being placed in front of their property. Prior to meeting with them, Bruce staked the east edge of the trailway on each person's property. The general consensus of the meeting was that most property ® owners were pleased with the trailway location because we were able to keep it away from front yard trees. Therefore, the location of the trailway does not appear to be a problem. As per the trailway width issue, the majority of the residents in attendance requested a five foot sidewalk instead of the eight foot trailway. I would divide the feeling of the residents into three areas regarding the trailway. There were some people who were vehemently against an eight foot trail, some people who had no problem with the eight foot trail until the five foot sidewalk substitution was brought up and one person who supported the eight foot trailway. I cited that the eight foot trailway is a standard in the City for two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic and that staff would still be recommending the eight foot trailway but that I would forward their comments to the City Council through you. I don't know how many people will attend the meeting Tuesday night. I imagine the ones who most vehemently oppose the eight foot trailway will be in attendance. I told them it would probably be after 10:00 before the Council could get to the issue of approving plans for Nicols Road upgrading. I also told them we didn't anticipate beginning construction on their end until next spring. In an unrelated item, the residents were very concerned about the speeds on Nicols Road. I suggested that they write a letter to you requesting that Nicols Road be added to the City's list for further speed study by Mn Dot. I don't know how far the residents will push this issue. I would be happy to discuss this matter in further detail with you if you so desire. (Z-9 Assistant City Engineer 76 RMH/jeh • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) --On June 17, the Council approved the final plans for the installation of streets and utilities to Daniel Drive adjacent to the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and authorized the advertise- ment for the bid opening that was held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, July 11. Enclosed on page /,S71 is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the engi- neer's estimate contained in the feasibility report discussed at the public hearing held on June 17, 1986. All bids will be checked for accuracy on additions and extensions and a final recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the July 15 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Our File No. 49395 DANIEL DRIVE • BID AMOUNT -- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ FEAS. REPT EST -- % UNDER ENC. EST — % UNDER FEAS. REPT EST. -- 6335d / P7 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, July 11, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $268,527.50 294,183.95 PROJECT 475 $240,277.50 270,000 283,870 302,959.27 306,402.85 328,807.20 331.847.05 PROJECT 468 $28,250 37,000 42,270 -23.6% —33.2% CONTRACTORS 1. Nodland Associates 2. Burschville Construction 3, C.L. Contracting 4. Northdale Construction 5. J.P. Norex 6. Crossings Inc. • BID AMOUNT -- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ FEAS. REPT EST -- % UNDER ENC. EST — % UNDER FEAS. REPT EST. -- 6335d / P7 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, July 11, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $268,527.50 294,183.95 PROJECT 475 $240,277.50 270,000 283,870 302,959.27 306,402.85 328,807.20 331.847.05 PROJECT 468 $28,250 37,000 42,270 -23.6% —33.2% • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 3. Contract 86-11., Award Contract (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) --At the July l meeting, the Council received the bids for the installation of sanitary sewer facilities to service the above referenced subdivisions.. However, the bids received for the Williams & LaRue sanitary sewer exceeded the estimate contained in the feasibility report by approximately 19%. Subsequently, the Council directed Staff to review these increased cost estimates based on competitive bids with the property owners to see if they still wish to proceed with the project. If the project is reaffirmed as discussed under the public hearing section of this agenda earlier in the meeting, it would be appropriate for the Council to award the contract to allow construction to begin. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award Contract 86-11 (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) to J. P. Norex, -Inc. in the amount of $172,387.20, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related contract documents and, if .appropriate, authorize the preparation of appropriate change orders to modify as...nece_ss_ary _----- /73 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 11, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE PROPOSED CHARITABLE GAMBLING POLICY City Councilmember Ellison prepared some information regarding a proposed Charitable Gambling Policy for review and discussion by the City Council. A copy of the policy and an Ordinance from the City of Janesville as presented. by Councilmember Ellison is attached on pagesthrough City Councilmember Ellison is planning to address this item immediately following the regular Council agenda as a part of City Council round table. • BLUE BELL ICE CREAM Attached for City Council reference is a letter that was sent by the City Administrator to Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. stating the specific conditions of operation. The letter is on page / BUILDING PERMITS Attached on pages ZZL through is a copy of the June Year -To -Date building p rmit informati AIRPORT NOISE Attached on pages /F,7-- through AV is a copy of a letter that was submitted to the City by a resident frustrated with the airport noise. • I -35E ACCESS FROM YANKEE DOODLE ROAD City Councilmember Wachter has asked for information regarding an additional access to I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from the City of Eagan and a response from the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the I -35E access. This information is enclosed on pages IY5 through IE6 . SANITARY SEWER BACKUP/ASPEN DRIVE At the last City Council meeting both Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Egan received a letter from Mr. Steven Kaplan,repre- senting Peggy House, for damages she sustained relating to a sanitary sewer backup. Since the item was addressed at the City Council meeting, a copy of our Public Works Director's response is enclosed on pages f % through IFOV . i7� FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORTS Enclosed on pages /E through Z�/� are copies of the March and April Fire Departm@nt Reports. 7— MN DEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS/TERESA A PIVAC VS CITY OF EAGAN Attached on pages through /5�%i is a copy of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights response stating that charges brought before the City of Eagan on hiring practices by Teresa Pivac have been dismissed. The Department of Human Rights has determined that the complaint of illegal discrimination is without merit. POLICE INFORMATION Enclosed is a copy of various police instances that have occurred from mid-June until early July. Also enclosed is a response • regarding the amount of training our child protection officer has received. This information is enclosed without page number. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 175 ED CHARITABLE GAMBLING POLICY THE CITY OF EAGAN GOAL: Set a policy ensuring that charitable gambling in Eagan is conducted by Eagan non-profit organizations and that the proceeds from that gambling are used for the betterment of our community. METHOD: 1) Require that organizations receiving charitable gambling licenses be non-profit groups, and show that at least half their members either work or reside within the City of Eagan (zip codes 55121, 55122 or 55123). Require such organizations to have at least 40 active members. 2) Require that applicants pledge (and later verify) that 80 percent of the net proceeds collected from charitable gambling be used to sup- port recreational, civic or cultural programs benefiting the citizens of Eagan. 3) Require that gambling to be done only in the premises owned by eli- gible approved organizations, or on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Eagan. 4) Require gambling within leased premises to be separate from the bar or service area, and do not allow sale of liquor within the leased area. Require that the sale of gambling paraphernalia be made by an active member of the conducting organization, or its auxiliary. Prohibit an owner or employee of the leased space from selling gambling paraphernalia while on duty. 5) Require the minimum age for charitable gambling to be the same as — the minimum age for drinking intoxicating liquor. ------------------- —------------ - REASON: 1) There is only a limited amount of revenue to be derived from chari- table gambling in Eagan, and organizations with a base in the city should have first claim on those dollars. Placing a minimum membership • at 40 people will stop fly-by-night groups from coming in and setting up shop. 2) Persons who participate in charitable gambling should have some assurance that their contributions are going toward worthwhile causes. Earmarking the great majority of revenue toward community projects should allay those fears. 3) By putting charitable gambling operations in locations dependent upon city licensure, the city will maintain better control over the activities. 4) Bartenders shouldn't be selling pull -tabs, even if they belong to the approved non-profit group. That turns the bar into a casino. Gambling paraphernalia should only be sold in separate leased areas by club members. Requiring the club to supply sellers will reduce the amount of casual gambling. 5) We don't want minors frequenting our bars. --30-- /J/ 'ORDINANCE NO. 206 An Ordinance to Provide for and Regulate �! The Conduct of Gambling and Related Activities within the City of }' Janesville, Minnesota City Council of the City of Janesville, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: . Subd. 1. Purpose and Intent. This ordinance is enacted for the following 'Purposes: to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the inhabitants of ,'ahe City of Janesville by closely regulat- ing the conduct of gambling. Subd. 2. The City Council finds that "gambling is a nuisance prone activity and as such, is subject to restrictive regula- tion. The Council further finds and declares that the ability to conduct gambling and participate in gambling, is 'a privilege rather than a right. Subd. 3. Provisions of State Law Adopted. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, relating to the definition of terms, licensing and restric- tions of gambling are adopted and made a part of this Section as if set out in full. Amendments made pursuant to legisla- tion to said Chapter shall also be incorporated and adopted herein without further action. Subd. 4. Local Approval of State Licensed Organizations. Pursuant to M.S. 349.213, the Charitable Gambling Control Board for the State of Minnesota must notify the City Council before issuing or renewing an organization license at the State level for those _ _,:organizations whose premises are located within the City. If the City Council adopts a resolution disapproving the State license and so informs the Board within 30 days of such notice, the license may not be issued or renewed. Subd. 5. Obligations of State Licensed Organizations. State licensed organiza- tions within the City shall provide to the City Clerk copies of all information which such organization provides to the Charit- able Gambling Control Board. Such copies shall be provided to the City Clerk within seven days after the State licensed organization sends such information to the State. Failure of a State Licensed organization to provide such copies shall constitute a basis for disapproval of the license or renewal by the City Council. Subd. 6. Eligibility for License. Eligi- bility for a charitable gambling license within the City of Janesville, shall be restricted to local fraternal, religious, veterans and educational and other non-profit organizations. A local organiz- ation shall be defined as an organization having at least 40 percent of its members who list a Janesville City or Rural Route mailing address which would include the existing Janesville zip code, 56048, or its successor as determined by the U.S. Postal Service. 177 Subd. 7. Use of Proceeds of Charitable Gambling. All applications for licenses ;hall state the proposed use of funds received from the gambling activity. No license will be approved unless verifica- tion on the application is.stated that at least 80 percent of the net proceeds collected from lawful charitable gambling shall be used to support recreational, cultural, and civic programs benefiting the citizens of Janesville. For purposes of this subsection, net proceeds shall be computed as follows: gross receipts from lawful gambling less reasonable sums necessarily and actually expended for the following items: (a) prizes; (b) gambling supplies and equipment which shall be defined as those expenses authorized by the Charitable Gambling Control Board in their adopted rules, specifically Subpart 2 (B) of Adopted Rule 7860.0160; (c) rent; (d) utilities used during gambling occa- sions (e) compensation paid to members for conducting gambling; (i) taxes impos- ed by Minnesota Statute Section 349.212 and; (g) maintenance of devices used in lawful gambling. - Subd. 8. Premises. The use of or sale of gambling supplies and equipment de- scribed as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on the premises owned by eligible organizations as defined in Subdivision 6 of this Ordinance. Except for the preceding, the use of the gambling supplies and equipment described in this Subdivision shall be allowed only on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license -issued by the City of Janesville for the . sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor. Subd. 8A. In leased locations authoriz- ed by this subdivision, the sale of pull -tabs, tip boards and the operation'of paddle wheels shall take place in a designated area of the leased premises which area shall be separate from the counter, bar or service area. No sale of on or off sale liquor shall be allowed within the leased area. Locations authorized by this subdivision which are owned by the charitable organization need not desig- nate such a location within the premises. Subd. 9. Only those persons who have reached the age at which they are allowed to consume intoxicating liquor by Min- nesota Statutes, shall be allowed to participate in the charitable gambling use of pull tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards or shall be employed by the organization requesting the charitable gambling li- cense for the purpose of accomplishing the sale of the gambling devices describ- ed in this subdivision. i. Subd. 10. Hours of Operation. The use or sale of gambling supplies and equip- ment described as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on premises owned or leased by those organizations eligible for a charitable gambling license pursuant to Subdivision 6 only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 1 a. in. -.,- . _. :f Subd. 11. The above notwithstanding, the conduct of bingo and sale of raffle tickets shall be allowed on Sundays and legal holidays when not prohibited by, Minnesota Statute 349 and any amend- ments thereto. 11 Subd. 12. Employees. Compensation to persons who participate in the conduct of lawful gambling, may be paid only to active members of the conducting organ- ization or its auxiliary, or to the spouse or the surviving spouse of an active mem- ber. - - , . _ , .. Subd. 13. The sale of pull -tabs; 'tip boards, paddle wheels and raffle tickets when accomplished on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Janesville for the sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor shall be accomplished by an active member of the conducting organ- ization or auxiliary or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member of the conducting organization. The pre- ceding notwithstanding, if the person conducting the sale is also the owner or the employee of the establishment wh re- in space is being rented by the cor- ing organization, said person may n 11 any pull -tabs, raffle tickets, or other charitable gambling supplies while he or she is then on duty with the lessor. Subd. 14. Each organizationwhichis licensed to conduct charitable gambling within the City of, Janesville, shall provide the City Administrator with a copy of all financial reports submitted to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board on a quarterly basis if there is any charitable gambling by that organization within the reporting period. - .. Subd. 15. To the extent- allowed by Minnesota Statutes, the Council may by resolution set a licensing or permit fee for the conduct of charitable gambling within the City of Janesville. The resolution may set fees for application, processingo ny application, including whatever a is are deemed appropriate to defray th st, of investigation of the proposed applicant by the Council, City Administrator, or Chief of Police and to make a determina- tion of the propriety of granting said li license. The City Administrator shall prepare a local application form and shall include verification that the applicant agrees to abide by the local ordinance concerning the conduct of licensed char- - itablegambling. Subd. 16. This Ordinance shall not regulate the. conduct of non -licensed . gambling as defined by Minnesota Stat- ute Chapter 349 et sec. - . . Subd. 17. Criminal Penalties. Any willful violation of the provisions of this Ordinance constitutes a misdemeanor. Subd. 18. Should any section or subsection of this Ordinance be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as. awhole or' any part thereof other than the part so ' declared to be invalid. Subd. 19. Ordinance No. 198 is hereby' repealed. Passed by the City Council this 28th day of April, 1986. arm -lllu � 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 July 7, 1986 MR GLEN BARON BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC 3218 SNELLING AVE MPLS MN 55406 Re: Approval for Blue Bell Ice Operate On Public Streets Dear Mr. Baron: Inc. to of E BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER COenb11 Members THOMAS HEDGES City A minislrasor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE I City Clefk In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc., was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public streets throughout the City of Eagan. The action was taken subject to the following conditions: 1) sub - miss -ion of an --insurance certificate providing the level of liabil- ities outlined in a letter from Mid -Continent Agencies, Inc., to the City of Eagan dated April 16, 1986; 2) hours of operation will be noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset; 3) the approval is granted until October 1, 1986; 4) the trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels; 5) caution swing arms will be required on each vehicle; 6) local employment will be used for drivers operating in Eagan. The City Council has directed our Police Department to record any and all complaints that may be received regarding operation of the ice cream truck. It is the City Council's desire to consider an ordinance sometime after October 1 that would address the aforementioned conditions and any other language they might desire if food/beverage vehicles are to be allowed in the future. If you have any questions regarding the action taken by the City Council, feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedge s City Administrator /71 cc: Jay Berthe, Chief of Police E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk/Director of Finance THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 191 806 Electrical Plumbing 192 83 884 637 HVAC 162 740 Water Softener Signs 25 159 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 1 =-.1 G NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED wnuTM v //I TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 5 FOUNDATION 2 30.00 30.00 485 SINGLE FAMILY 105 9,207,500 41,257.00 20,612.50 232,5 .25 24 DUPLEX 6 390,000 1,956.00 978.00 12,634.00 117 TOWNHOUSE 26 4,228,600 14,971.00 4,513.50 147,573.50 8 CONDO 1 438,000 1,278.Ob 639.00 14,304.00 1 APT BLDGS 1 5,760,000 14,583.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 0 AGRICULTURAL 11 COMMERCIAL 2 625,000 - 1,853.50 926.75 9,566.75 26 COMM/IND REMODEL 5 131,372 795.50 375.50 1,237.50 2 COMM/IND ADDITION 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTIONAL 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 13 RES. GARAGES 4 26.,180 256.00 -- 272.00 12 RES. ADDITIONS 1 5,184 56.50 -- 59.50 9 SWIM POOL 5 45,900 384.50 .156.75 565.75 89 MISCELLANEOUS 32 95,216 1,224.50 -- 1,283.00 0 DEMOLISH 1 HOUSE MOVES 1 -- 15.00 =- 15.00 806 TOTALS 191 20,952,952 781665.50 35,493.50 636,480.75 YEAR-TO-DATE 806 78,467,602 314,353.50 151,072.20 2,121,317.70 //I PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE JUNE 1986 MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN TYPE # OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 6 3 6 390,000 1,956. 193.00 978.00 $ 12,634.00 4-PLEX 12 3 12 683,600 3,624. 340.00 1,812.00 24,790.00 5-PLEX 5 1 5 345,000 1,700• 172.50 850.00 10,645.00 7-PLEX 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM RE 8-PLEX 9 5 72 3,022,0009,202. 1,511.00 1,629.00 105,298.00 APT. BLDG 1 1 1441 5,760,000 14,583. 1,538.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 12-PLEX 1 1 12 616,000 1,723. 308.00 861.50 21,144.50 TOTALS 1 34 14 251 10,816,600 32,788, 4,062.50 13,422.00 390,882.00 �o COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN � BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 3908 SIB MEM HWY DAKOTA CTY. 12215 L 123, B 1, CEDARVALE OF REALTORS $ 13,000 $ 98.50 $ 6..50 $ 49.25 $ 154.25 COMM REI 12217 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM RE L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 1 COMPANY 12186 3815 NICOLS RD BRAD RAGIN 30,000 193.00 15.00 96.50 304.50 COMM RE' L 2 B 25 SECT 19 TIRE CO 12138 4030 PILOT KNOB RD ST JOHN 15,372 116.50 8.00 58.25 182.75 COMM RE NEUMAN NEUMAN CHURCH 1325 EAGANDALE CT OPUS CORP 69,500 343.00 35.00 171.50 549.50 COMM RE 12152 T. I B 1, EAG CTR IND PK #7 12153 680 DIFFLEY RD NW BELL TELE 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM NE 4250 LEXINGTON AVE S LEXINGTON CTR 600,000 1,683.00 300.00 841.50 9,298.50 COMM NE 12172 T. 1 R I- FAG QTR 1ST LTD PARTNER PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1985 NO. OFFICE HOURS - INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Wilding 710.5 1.878 Plumbing 145 8415 HVAC 92 372 Signs 0 Administrative/Office 21 Fire Marshal MULTI-FAMILT 274 11,375,000 77 5 225 Miscellaneous General 57 '-4.7 Office 254 -- Permit Processing 1]6.5 1,287.1 COMMERCIAL 5 1,317.2 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 165 651 Electrical U W Plumbing 131 610 HVAC 113 532 N ater Softener 3 520 Signs 9 63 62.5 6 66.0 Well Cesspool—, Septic lank 1 42 18,900 202 1 0.� MATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED SWIM POOL • TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee, SAC d MAC charges, rater meter, roadunee, parks dedication A rater treatment Plant fee. TYPE NO. VALUATION-VPERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEE 320 SINGLE FAMILY 90 $ 6,415,000 $ 31,160 $ 15,580.25 184,925.] 38 2 -FAMILY 0 149 MULTI-FAMILT 27 11,375,000 32,914 16,457.00 489,010.5 2 AGRICULTURAL 0 -- -- gU 25 COMMERCIAL 5 4,475,000 12,102.5 6,05!.25 61,547.2 I INDUSTRIAL 0 m U W U 0 INSTITUTIONAL O U W 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES I 6,400 62.5 a 66.0 12 BES. GARAGES 4 18,900 202 — 212 12 SWIM POOL 4 52,850 406 64.25 497.2 90 XISCELLANEOUS 34 128,100 1,216 156.50 1,442.5 657 707AL5 165 22,471,250 78,063 38,709.25 737,697.2 m YEAR-T0.DATE 651 59;263,287 239,804 117,670.50 1,664,091.0 • TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee, SAC d MAC charges, rater meter, roadunee, parks dedication A rater treatment Plant fee. 3 U 6 W U m W gU Q, M m U W U W U U W O W W W a a o a o o O O O 0 0 0 N o 0 0 o m r ut ut w W IO r1 r T 1'1 r n m r a S o n r F O O N O O V W O N r N N 2 W 1 r7 N A s 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N O O r1 N O N O O w O P OI b P P v � U N U N N N o 0 �roi o o uoi W r n 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 O p O O N O O F a m N o m < .-1 n rl m o. .1 N ❑ S F m a a0 m a a a U 0 o s 0 C U 3 O z v U > W Z ❑ m a W m W O a O a W a O ❑ m Or F OU .O]WO.Fs=❑000 F4 1XW 4mNWmCF4 Z Wv.0UWUW a U0£ F W•a a• NHN� Wrv,❑j�0 ON �a'amF U OmUmUm e a o m o .n o in aa.yN r m.ymNNn ry wt v O e H 0 0 0 0 0 0 a �: ;' I �3.:. t•�S i Eli l Illll • 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Ma r PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER February 18, 1986 courcd Members THOMAS HEDGES GN Admmehww EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Oty Cl.k MR KERMIT MCCRAE DISTRICT ENGINEER MNDOT DISTRICT 9 3485 HADLEY AVENUE NORTH BOX 9050 OAKDALE MN 55109 Re: I -35E Access From Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) Dear Kermit: At the regular City Council meeting of February 4, 1986, the Council expressed concern regarding the potential traffic conflict associated with the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road wanting to proceed northbound on I -35E. As a result of these concerns, they directed me to contact your office ---- to get a response to the following questions: -- - - 1. Why wasn't a direct "diamond interchange" access ramp provided for northbound I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road instead of the existing "loop" in the southeast quadrant? 2. When does the state plan to install the traffic signal on County Road 28 for the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road onto northbound I -35E? Your review and response to these questions will be appreciated and forwarded to the Council for their information. If any additional explanation is necessary to clarify the Council's concerns, please contact me at your convenience. 7erely, f-1LThomas A. bert, Director of Public Works TAC/jj THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYM80L OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY dANNESOT4 �o yo Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9050 North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Telephone 779-1178 March 7, 1986 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 2830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Sox 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 ® Dear Mr. Colbert: SUBJECT: C.S. 1982 (I -35E at Co.Rd. 28) 1f In response to your two questions in your February 1P8, 1986 letter, we provide the following: 1. The traffic projects that the interchange was designed to accommodate showed that the predominant movement was eastbound Yankee Doodle Road ___-tonorthbound .I -35E.._ Therefore, the loop was provided to eliminate the left turn conflict that would have resulted with a standard diamond interchange .ramp design. 2. A Contract to install traffic signals at this intersection has already been let. Construction will begin this spring with the • traffic signals in operation in the late summer. We trust this information answers the Council's questions. Sincerely, Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer An Equal Opporluniq, Employer of 3630 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 July 9, 1986 MR STEVEN Z KAPLAN HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON 1221 NICOLLET MALL SUITE 700 MPLS` MN 55403 Re: Sanitary Sewer Backup Claim, (Yankee Doodle Road) 1542 Aspen Drive Dear Mr. Kaplan: .4, June 7, 1986 BEA BLOMQUIST THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES Ctty Admnbt w EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CIN Clete Mayor Blomquist and Councilman Egan requested that I respond to your letter of June 23 regarding the damages sustained by Peggy House"L21^a't1h'9—t6 the sanitary sewer backup of June 7. Your comment of apparent "serious and fundamental design deficiencies in the City's sewer system" cannot be substantiated by our review of the sewer system. While we are aware this is the third occurrence of sewer flooding to her home since 1979, the first two occurrences were directly related to construction activities of which the City had no knowledge or control over specific operations that resulted in damage to our sewer line. . With approximately 160+ miles of sanitary sewer..througEout the , City, our maintenance crews have set up a routine inspection, cleaning and maintenance of all lines on a repetitive basis. ,''This aggressive maintenance program has greatly minimized the number of sanitary sewer backups per mile of system to a very effective level. However, there is no way that the ,City can predict or prevent future sanitary sewer backups. I am not aware of any situation where the City has been "wholly unresponsive" to Ms. House's request for implementation of corrective measures. We have discussed -various alternatives with her and informed her of options that she may choose to implement if she wishes to achieve a higher level of protection beyond what -- any other homeowner is provided by our municipal maintenance operations. IS4 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 4s KR STEVEN Z KAPLAN JULY 9, 1986 PAGE 2 It is my understanding that Ms. House has been compensated for past damages by the insurance company representing the contractors responsible for the previous sewer backups. We have also forwarded her most recent claim to the City's insurance agent for investigation and action. In summary, we cannot find any "obviously serious defect" in our n- ••,sewer system. We have placed this particular segment of sanitary :'sewer on a high maintenance schedule and will be televising it in the near future to further verify the integrity of this system. I will be happy to review with you any definitive and positive recommendations you may have regarding our sanitary sewer. collection system. hope that this letter satisfies your request for a prompt response from the City of Eagan regarding this matter. Sincerely, t A-.Colbert;--`p:E.77 - Director of Public Works TAC/jj EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPAME NT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF April 1986 TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 932 Training 433 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 163 Station Maintenance 205 Fire Prevention 42 Administrative 499 TOTAL 2,274 Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave Rookies FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other TOTAL STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 1 1 1 • 9 4 6 11 15 9 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 a- -- -- 25 22 18 KMER 5 $ LOSS • $ 800 5 2 19 8 2 41 $ 800 LOCATION OCCUPANCY S LOSS 17 EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTT4ENT MONTHLY REPORT Z ,i J FOR MONTH OF March 1986 j File/Rescue 594 Training 493 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 168 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 28 Administrative 291 TOTAL MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 AD 1 1 1 Chiefs Available Days 9 4 6 Available Nights 11 15 9 Available Rotating 2 1 2 On Leave 2 1 0 Rookies 0 0 0 25 22 18 TOTAL — — FIR$/�7E TYPE NUMBER $ loss • Structure 4 i n n Grass 2 Vehicle 2 2,500 False 4 Medical 10 Other 1 23 2,600 "AL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 3/16/86 Coachman Apts. Car $2,500 10 1 M/fi got7a rr- ,June 27, 1986 Thomas Hedges, Admin Ci I:y of Fagan 3795 Pilot Knot) Road Fagan, MN 55.127. Dear Thomas Hedges: Hmali RFF: 614335 -MCS -1S Teresa A. Pivac VS. City of Fagan dFC- ti P. CZ)orf} The Depaltmeut of Human R:ighLs has made an i.mpartl.al irlqui.ry into . the issues, ra.i.sed (n L.he ;,bove captioned charge, drid has reviewed the i.nformal,ion provided in conuect-i.orr with Lhe charge. Anal.ysl.s of the InformaL,i.on ava.i.lahle .in this rrratter discloses that Etre comp 1.a.i.nC of illegal. di. scri,mina t.*I.on .i.s INi1.hout mer i. t. Minn. Sl:al:- 363.06, Sui1d- 4(1.), provides for the Commissioner's dismissal of charges which are found to he without merit. The charge has been disrni.ssed pursuant Lo this provision. The Department will take no further action on this ❑tattel . Pursuant Lo Minn. Star.- 363-14, Suhd. 1.(b)(1), Lhe charging party may bring a civil action against the respondent in district court, within 45 days of Lhe dismissal of this case. If you have any questions, you may contact the department at (612) 296-5669. Since ,ly, • Dr. Linda C. .Johnson commis_;ioiler Enclosures AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 500 Bremer Tower, 7th Place and Minnesota Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612)296-5663 or (800)652-9747 Rased to the 4 (1). cgo�7 MEMORMNDUM of I �Gl'yG'v Ref: E14325 on the information stated below, this case has been DISMISSED pursuant authority vested in the Co7waissioner by Minnesota Statutes 363.06 subd. 1. A review of the qualifications, experience, and education of - the applicants hired for the positions in question indicates 40 that these factors, and not an illegal consideration of sex, were the criteria used by respondent to select the successful candidates, since all persons hired possessed higher qualifications for the position than did charging party. It is not the intent of the Minnesota Hunan Rights Act to prevent an employer from using any nondiscriminatory criteria it desires in making personnel decisions. -�i 2. Charging party stated that she had speculated that respondent ------.might.-, -screen applications subjectively because she has reason to believe a neigh:.,oring municipality has done so. 3. The Minnesota Human -slights Act provides that the employment of one person in place of another, standing by itself, shall not be evidence of an unfair discriminatory practice. AN Eq'_'AL OP-ORTUN!TY EMPLOYER .CJ c . •L.irso;a Si101 or p5'.)1'.5" -37a7 . LIQUOR LICENSE GUIDELINES City of Eagan 1. Off -sale liquor establishments will only be allowed in areas zoned for commercial business. 2. Liquor stores will not be allowed within 500 feet of schools, churches or _ residential neighborhoods. (State law requires only a 300 foot spacing, only �t from schools and churches.) If any existing store is within the 500 -feet limit, they will be grandfathered in. 3. Off -sale will not be permitted in an on -sale establishment. 4. Liquor stores will not be allowed adjacent to establishments that serve primarily a juvenile audience (candy stores, video game parlors, etc.). 5. Conviction of selling alcoholic beverages to minors will result in an imme- diate, automatic forfeiture of that person's liquor license. Reapplication ^^ cannot be made for at least three years. Other topics for consideration: -- Should off -sale stores be limited to free-standing buildings? -- Should stores be spaced at least one mile apart? -- Should an economic feasibility study be required? Q� 1 R RESOLUTION EAGAN CITY COUNCIL COMPRI HOTEL JULY 15, 1986 WHEREAS, four applications were submitted by Opus Corporation and Compri Hotel Corporation for rezoning from GB, General Business and L-1, Light Industrial to Commercial Planned Development, preliminary plat approval for Compri Hotel and conditional use permit for Compri Hotel building on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Industrial Park 1st Addition in Outlot A of Eagandale Office Park located at the southeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive in Eagan; and WHEREAS, further a request was made for an amendment to the Comprehenisve Guide Plan from Industrial and General Business Use to Commercial Planned Development including Roadside Business use for the location of a hotel on the property, and WHEREAS, a portion of the property had been designated for a Roadside Business use classification, but the Minnesota Department of Transportation at the time of the acquisition of adjacent property for the construction of the I494/Pilot Knob Road interchange acquired part of the property formerly designated for Roadside Business; NOW THEREFORE upon motion duly made by , seconded by , it was RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council be and it hereby is on record as follows: 1. The applications described above are hereby denied for reasons including the following: a. LIP c. 2. The application for amendment of the Comprehensive Guide Plan to Roadside Business use is hereby approved for reasons including the following: a. A portion of the property had previously been designated for Roadside Business use, but the interchange of Pilot Knob Road/1494 was expanded to include a part of the RB property and therefore in order to accomodate a hotel on the site, it is necessary to expand the Roadside Business use area. b. The owners of the property have for an extended period of time intended that a hotel/motel be constructed on the general site. C. The strategic location at the southeast quadrant of Pilot' Knob Road and 1494 is an appropriate location for hotel/motel use to accomodate the rapidly growing commercial, industrial and residential uses in the general area and an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide land use plan would be feasible and appropriate. Ca Those in favor: Those against: NOW THEREFORE upon motion by seconded by it was RESOLVED that the City Council is here on record as follows: 1. The applications for rezoning, preliminary plat approval and for conditional use permit are approved subject to the following conditions: (See conditions provided in Planner's report.) Those in favor: Those against: Dated: ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By: By: E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk Beatta Blomquist, Mayor AGENDA REGULAR MMING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL - JULY 15, 1986 6:30 P.H. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS PJ( A. Parks & Recreation Department f.(o B. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA ,p8(l A. Personnel Items U \DLB. Contractors Licenses \4 C. Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation/ V Retirement to 18 Months 1p D. Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Office Park 2nd) (PE. Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) •, �at(oF. Project 439, Receive.Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) 11G. Project 44.1, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) \IH. Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (O'Neil Pond Outlet) Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating) ra .XoJ. Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) 10 K. Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report 1 (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) at L. Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition Q 24M. Final Plat Approval, Overbill Farm 2nd Addition Final Plat Approval, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition 0. Project 85-M, Final Acceptance (Wescott Hills 4th Addition -Storm Pa Sewer) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets � 44SB. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition IkgD. Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition _ Sanitary Sewer (Continued from July 1, 1986, meeting) pq,SlE. Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Rd. -Trunk Storm Sewer 9OF. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of ��• Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City (Continued from the June 17, 1986, Meeting) �, ut✓� '� o� r• sp� �c�, �o� --h��- s r;lc\ L�R,,.,, -to CO �]�, �\ S-FC� 'LSi '• /LLcMn..ri . Co o. C int o n .sL��onn ��eZ, .who Q ol0- 1'� L S.s."C C o CC,? _ Qa e S I t� o w nfix c\ c • _� -0o o -v\ c9J • s �y LLQ IOq Pam C p0_ii•Q.9� E -t .-Lek �P� VI. OLD BUSINESS D�,ga A. Off-Sale Liquor License for. Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) TT Continued from June 17, 1986, Meeting P� q3 B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments VII. NEW BUSINESS ftgSA. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/Dakota County HRA First-Time Homebuyers Program B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation) Duplex Lot Split for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lot 5, Block 3, Abutting Vienna Lane, NE C. 1/4 of Section 31 Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 S.F. of Addi- tional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign, Dakota County Bank, Lot 2, Block 2, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 7—D. Rezoning (Overbill Properties, Inc.) from R-2, Residential ��� Double, to R-1, Residential Single, for Lots 1,2;5,6,&7, of Block 2, Overbill Farm 1st Addition, Located at Dodd & Cliff Roads, SW 1/4 of Section 25 E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising, Sign Company - V U Mark Baird) for an Advertising Sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Located South of I-494 & East of Pilot Knob Road, NW 1/4 of Section 3 • p^,\� Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition 00O (Sienna Corporation) Consisting of 69 Single Family Lots on Approximately 34 Acres Located West of Dodd Road & North of Cliff Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25 Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office \ O Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant on Approximately 7 Acres & a Rezoning from GB (General Business) & LI (Light Industrial) to Commercial Planned Development & a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment on Lots 1,2,&3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park & Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, Located at Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive, NW 1/4 of Section 3 ss� 13\ H. �O Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds (Robert Engstrom) Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19.6 Acres & a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) Abutting Pilot Knob Road to the West, South of St. John Neumann Church, SW 1/4 of Section 22 Preliminary Plat for The Trails of Thomas Lake (New Horizon rlk�I. QC) Homes) Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units on Approximately 14 Acres Located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, North of Clemson ,II & West of Thomas Lake Road, NW 1/4 of Section 28 \S1 J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments (Design Collective) e� Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres & ce, Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) Located South t6 of Violet Lane Abutting Federal Drive, SE 1/4 of Section 16 �a �J 0 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS of ,JGG A. League of Minnesota Cities Sound Level Meter Program iU B. Public Improvement Projects 1(49 1. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicoll Road) 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) 3. Contract 86-11, Award Contract (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham P� -11 3 Corporate Center) I%. VISITORS TO BE BEARD (for, those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT r1 LJ 3 MEMO TO:. HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 10, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the July 15, 1986, agenda and regular City Council .meeting minutes for the July 1 meeting and special minutes for the June 26 meeti-ng, the following items are in order for consideration: A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --At the July 1, 1986, City Council meeting, the Parks & Recreation Director and Advisory Commission were given direction to proceed with further negotia- tions on expanding the acreage of Northview Athletic Field and to acquire the 15 acre Ohman parcel adjacent to the Fairway Hills plat. Regarding consideration to purchase the Barr parcel located on Highway 3 for a future athletic site, was continued •and the Director of Parks & Recreation was asked analyze certain tracts of land throughout the City that might be available for future athletic field's and present a map and findings to the City Council for review. That study has been -completed and for a copy of the study, refer to pages 7i through_ 5 . The Director of Parks & Recreation will be available to review the study during Department Head Business. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the Director of Parks & Recreation and Advisory Commission regarding land acquisition for a future athletic field site. 0 11 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARES AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 9, 1986 HE: ATHLETIC SITE ACQUISITION At the City Council meeting on July 1, the City Council reviewed Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation for athletic site purchases. The City Council approved the Commission's recommendation for the acquisition and development of two of the three sites. The third site was continued pending further reviewal. Council expressed some concern over the proximity of this parcel to the City's eastern edge, and a desire for a more centrally located facility. Staff was asked to provide information concerning which other parcels had been reviewed, and the general process for searching and reviewing alternative locations. Attached to this memorandum are three graphics, which will help to depict the ® process Staff used in searching out suitable parcels. The first graphic locates all commercial and industrial property, and properties which -have been platted for residential or other purposes. Other parcels blotted out are existing park holdings, public facilities such as school property. The second graphic depicts parcels which Staff and Commission have reviewed. The extent of each reviewal varied with the particular parcel. Some parcels were explored and rejected, because of severe topography. Other parcels were reviewed, but excluded because an indication of a high sales price. Finally, others were reviewed after preliminary site planning was initiated. The final composite shows remaining parcels which have not been reviewed, but were excluded for one reason or another. An intensive review can be made on any of these parcels, if the Council feels it would be appropriate to review and discuss these further. Staff was also directed to review the parcel immediately south of the City's municiple center. This parcel is approximately 8.74 acres in size, and abutts Pilot Knob Road. This parcel is currently being offered for sale with a $70,000 asking price. Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan has prepared a concept plan for this site. This concept plan will be presented at the Council meeting. KV/bls C, J v Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two • B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Receive Peti ion, Wescott Road (Streets) --Enclosed on pages r dthrough F is a copy of a petition received from several ents of the South Hills Addition as referenced on page requesting a reduction in speed limit and the improving of that gravel portion of Wescott Road, between the highline crossing and South Hills Addition. " Enclosed on page 16 is a map showing the relationship of the present improved section from Elrene Road to T.H. 149 along with that segment being constructed under Contract 86-13. Prior tothe improvement of this remaining half - mile section of Wescott Road, it will be necessary to install the appropriate utilities to service potential future development of adjacent properties. Therefore, if the Council is to give any consideration to this requested improvement, it should consider not only the street improvement but also the required underlying utilities. During 1985, the City requestedMn Dot District 9 to perform speed surveys on various streets within the City of Eagan to determine • the appropriate enforceable speed limit that would be approved by the Commissioner of Transportation. The results of that study indicated that the portion from South 'Hills Drive to T.H. 149 should be established as 50 M.P.H. with that portion from Lexington Avenue to South Hills Drive (gravel) not posted. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for the upgrading of Wescott Road and order/deny the installation of appropriate improvements. n U J RECEIVED Juvi z 3 }g . We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently • increased speed limit of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE n U ,,,,cw.11oy77v7 f� L/�/J C� 4S.2-�s4a ((t Chiitinniy 3707 500-4l 4LU7 `-I5to-05� MzO!I�. RECEIVED Ju1v We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently • increased speed limit of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. NAMF ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1 )n, 1�-� -t_.'�4e v n .Pnr ;-I ( -1 ---) V " S'/'�-. �. (ti_ '+� = U 36 ti 'row 6 ro IL s3 ISO, Z 10 c Ix ea 12 13 14 r1:100 �edvx LLJ fiOU U) LANE TH WILL! My t KK. io oll L I r % .... ..... ........ Sou S.LS ir LLI Y.'_ 44 WESCOTT ROAD WETCOTT Mn"• NII&I N. W. 1/4 SEG 24, T-4 ............ • ID �I 3 a J y Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting is Page Three There are fifteen (15,) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should' be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required in brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item - 1. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Fourteen applications were received by the City for the vacant position of part-time, clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. Of these applications, six applicants were given typing tests, written tests, and were interviewed. Itis the recommendation of Administrative Assistant Duffy and Administrative Secretary Finnegan that Corrine Smith be hired to fill the vacant clerk -typist position. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Corrine -Smith-- to fill the vacant position. of clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. The appointment is to be effective July 14;, 19'86,. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four CONTRACTOR LICENSE B. Contractor's Licenses --Attached on page /3 is a list of contractors who'are renewing or who have been selected and retained' as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client's permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THISITEM: To approve the list of Contractor Licenses are presented. Y • • • CONTRACTORS' LICENSE JULY 15, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. FIRST LANDMARK BUILDERS 2. HOMECARE, INC 3. HOUSTON CONSTRUCTION 4. MADERA HOMES INC 5. MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO 6. MIDWEST FENCE & MFG CO 7. MOE-OSUM CONSTRUCTION CO 8. M.J. MOSER CONSTRUCTION 9. MARTIN SCHUTROP CONST 10. T.J. CONTRACTING INC 1. AIR REFRIGERATION 2. ALBERS SHEETMETAL & VENT 3. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG PLUMBING 1. DAVE DEMPSEY PLBG. 2. FREEPORT HARDWARE (PHIL'S PLBG & HTG) 3. LICHLITER BROS 4. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG 5. MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES INC 6. NIKKO PLBG 7. QUALITY PLBG. • 8. ROSEVILLE PLBG & HTG INC 9. TERRY'S PLUMBING 10. WOODBURY MECHANICAL INC �� • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five EXTENSION OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE C. Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation or Retirement to Eighteen Months --On April 7, 19'86, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) was signed into law by President Reagan. COBRA requires an employer to provide the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees and dependents to the following limits: 1. Eighteen months from the date of termination of employment, for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct or reduction of hours; or from the date of reduction in an employee's hours, if such a reduction causes a loss or reduction of the employee's coverage. 2. 36 months for the employee's spouse and dependent children from the date of: a. The death of the covered employee. . b. Divorce or legal separation of the covered employee. • c. The covered employee becomes entitled to benefits under Medicare. d. A dependent child ceases to be eligible as a dependent according to the terms of the insurance plan. Continuation of coverage will end prior to either. the 18 or 36 month period as of the date on which: 1,. The person covered under the continuation fails to make timely payments as required under the plan. 2. The continued person becomes eligible under another group medical plan. 3. The continued dependent becomes eligible for Medicare.. 4. A spouse who is continuing because of divorce or legal separation remarries and becomes covered under a group health plan. 5. The group health plan, insured or self-insured, ends. The continuation coverage is required to be identical to the coverage provided to persons actively participating in the plan. The necessary premium may be required to be paid by the person • whose coverage is continued. Agenda Information Memo July 15,'1986, City Council Meeting Page Six CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM C. (continued) State Law currently requires continuation for 12 months instead of 18 months, and this. is the procedure that the City of Eagan has been following. It is recommended that this continuation period be extendedto 18' months to conform to Federal law.. The entire cost of the premium will be paid by the person whose coverage is continued. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the City of Eagan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees ,and depen- dents to 18 or 36 months (depending upon the circumstances) as provided by Federal law from the date of termination of employ- ment for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct. 0 15 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 446, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING ,EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 2ND ADDITION D. Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assess- ment roll completed. .This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 446 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addi- tion) and schedule the public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 435, AS IC ® E. Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) --Final costs for the installation of streets and utilities to service the above referenced subdivision have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adop- tion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 435 (Eagan Woods Office Park) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986.. 439, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC F. Project 439, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Safari 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final •assessment roll for Project 439 (Safari 2nd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight • PROJECT 441, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING WESTBURY 3RD ADDITION G. Project 441,, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Westbury 3rd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared_ This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 441 (Westbury 3rd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 443 RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC H. Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (,O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --Although construction is not 100% complete on the above referenced ,project, all assess- ments associated with this project are trunk area rates which are not dependent upon the final costs of the project. Subsequent- ly, the final assessment roll using these set trunk area assessment rates have been completed. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE. CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 443 (O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. • 17 4 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine CONTRACT 86-8, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 1986 SEALCOATING I_ Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating)--At the July 1 Council meeting, the Council received bids and awarded the contract for the 1986 Sealcoating Program to Allied Blacktop - ping. Due to the exceptional bids received, the 1986 program based on bids received ($69,775.58) was considerably below the 1986 budget ($122,0.0.0.00). Subsequently, the Council directed the Staff to review our Sealcoating Program and work with the contractor to determine if additional streets could be added to this year's contract to take advantage of the exceptional bids received. Staff has prepared a Change- Order which would add approximately $50,805.0;0 to the sealcoating contract bringing the total amount to $120,580.63. Enclosed on page is a listing of streets that are being added to this year program under this Change Order. WACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM•: Approve Change Order #1 to Contract 86-8 (19'86 Sealcoating) in the amount of $50,805.05. • • PAGE NO. 00001 07/10/86 STREET NAME Thomas Ln Richard's Ct Walden Dr Kirkwood Dr Parkview Ln Gabbert Cir Sudbury Ln Sheffield Ln Sheffield Cir Shevlin Ct Golfview Ln ** TOTAL ** 41AGE NO. 00001 07/10/86 STREET NAME 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -2 AGGREGATE FROM Cliff Rd Thomas Ln Thomas Ln Lexington Av Lexington Av Parkview Ln Wilderness Run Rd Sherwood Way Sheffield Ln Sherwood Way Yankee Doodle TO 200' W of Walden CDS CDS Parkview- Ln CDS CDS Wilderness Run Rd Norwood Dr CDS CDS Dead End 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -3 GRANITE AGGREGATE FROM Comserve Dr Yankee Doodle Rd Towerview Rd Pilot Knob Rd Slater Rd Cliff Rd Robin Ln Blackhawk Rd Blackhawk Rd Cliff Rd Slater Rd Cinnamon Rdg Trl Cinnanom Ridge Trl Cliff Rd Rahn Way Rahn Rd Rahn Rd Cliff Rd Cedarview Dr Old Cedar Hwy Library Park'g Lot ** TOTAL ** • TO TH 13 CDS Storland Rd Blackhawk Rd Diffley Rd Cinnamon Trl Slater Rd Dead End Rahn Way Cedarvale Blvd SQ. YDS. 4786 2230 2400 1927 4260 1166 5038 2530 1430 2033 2836 30636 SQ.YDS. 9416 4820 19452 8665 26350 6036 8836 1476 2959 4504 9435 101949 • fo Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986., City Council Meeting Page Ten PROJECT VE FEASIBILITY REPORT J. Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) --Recently, staff received an application for development of the property east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road. While this appli- cation is being processed through the Planning Commission at their July meeting to be considered by Council in August, the developer has requested that the preliminary study and feasibility report be initiated to provide the sanitary sewer service necessary for this parcel's development. Recognizing that there are no guarantees of approval through this staff/commission/council review process, yet guaranteed all costs associated with this report and detailed plans and specifications, if for some reason this project is not approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 478 (Lexington Hills Addition• - Sanitary Sewer) and order the feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications,. 479, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT K. Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) --Similar to the reasoning associated with the petition for Project 478 discussed previously, the developer of the Lexington South PUD (Jim Curry), has requested the Council to prepare the feasibility report and detailed plans for the installation of trunk storm sewer facilities for that area east of Lexington Avenue between Northview Park entrance road and Diffley Road. This trunk storm sewer will be necessary for the development of Lexington Avenue in 1988 and any earlier development of land within this portion of the Lexington South PUD. Mr. Curry has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report and detailed plans if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, and order the feasibility report and detailed plans. PQ Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven • FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER ADDITION L. Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Wyndham Corporate Center Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road opposite Corporate Center Drive, by the Trammel Crow Corporation. Enclosed on pages and are copies of the legally described final plat and site plan for the construction of the Eagan Woods Garden Hotel, showing the modification of the road entrance to Pilot Knob Road. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat at the time of approval by Council action on August 20, 1985, have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to; be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Wyndham Corporate Center Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • N' • EXHIBO „A„ • WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER 1 �m I .. ..__ CIS awn BLVM f LOT 1 Op BLOCK 1 ; 1 W W L) 0.). X 3 I q --l.,w.�.�r.+.iw�a.•r_w..i.p—.i..i�r..�. :. o..�.i.wii� w..._../ -. ,_a -..r .xm �.'):�'�•�� _rr..r �••�/F aw�ti/i�.a«w. \ 8y ~ e-_;• '�i ��t lE n ,P. 1 � 001+0. yio Ru pp [i rp, Pum — -- — PPy..+... /�•k.•1P..w.✓F. a. rPrs <.,.P. -r — —T usorYn`unv XV u[A4[yI[o puMi Wl]O if ILZL . rm�l.v lurtn ur roto u unuunpL r. n.. _.y....r.- . nas.mla e. uol[ rl... omnlu ono. (wlluw[o omPnt (p¢)pnln[[., u[I¢o a ¢moult Illt[�. NI. J.'...1 ➢rrd s 7. I. C � PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES 1 iy •�. t I � I I � •,MA 1 smiC � sIs PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES i EXHIBIT „q„ PMMI eurNmr Io`erueruuLe • 1140M Ie� reru areveca, TM CORPORATE CENTER ////DRIVE I N Ne Th" Psnlnan aeon Inc PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES EAGAN WOOD GARDEN HOTEL iuu[ RECORD PA IND A SITE DMENSION PLAN 7 Agenda Information Memo July 1'5, 19'8'6, City Council Meeting IS Page Twelve 11 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for Overhill Farm 2nd Addition --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition, located east of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Enclosed on page Z5 is a copy of the proposed final plat. All conditions placed. on the preliminary plat approval of March 19,, 1985, have been complied with. Also, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 471 • • 1 OVERHILL FARM SECOND ADDITION / Nq H LW w wEF LL rw "T AmTICY - -T 7u - r-•om-T 1 1 1 I I� s' II 1� I n : I_ 11 II II N 1 I . 4 II I I •r I I Imo- � I. r IIs~' � anlp• [IEYQY II "tie C Yt�M•v.[ i t ! 1 Cy 2 •A 3 __Jl io'p �-li ion iil,`r Ly!'.. -.A• - w4 J 4 �i L.Eoo-� 5 BD 1i �_ J um- 1 6 8^. �� l_ 1! um-• I 7 9" um- 1 g 8� L_ J Lrm I• OYAaEC 4YlaIM g 04. � l aI I!� 1 do -+am-i - _I V .J ana •Aar mNYraxrollAnw _ . - •. auowrs w omo xup w nm ww DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT [L[�Tla•aaa.n ARE SHOWN THUS: t"L N]10 q nET IN YOTM ap 1pVui lTIQET NL! NrO!([LT N V6TM Pp wpaK {pr Lca wlns orxuErs[ Nwurzo MINNEWTA VALLEY S.AYff S I.C. z5 SEG 25•T -27,R23 MTlY IEYD ' NnpTy NL lA F g rn sr uo ![W e am Eolo A awcLl[ VICINITY MAP SCALE,I INCH • 100 FEET loo m o wo [m o Damn !/• lx[x sr l[ .q1 um nrE LQPAm, ssr AIO lr�lll®n CainarNw R ersa, Ina[a oPara NwrL M 4frM Y4 Or M 11[mIU "T p pI[INLL Pal run wnnoN•rs asLlPzom luE xer Y'!12 u04L IEUPGf YC E[YiPE MAA. 21 is Agenda Information Memo July 15, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, RAHN CLIFF IST ADDITION N. Final Plat Approval for Rahn Cliff 1st Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition located south of Cliff Road and west of I -35E. Enclosed on page Z is a copy of the final plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of October 2, 1984 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Rahn Cliffls.t Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 26 I4 t L;I;i... •�C^Miw Y.. N V r .I: CAI. CRg4- 1 1 il,Epl. OF X� Clii>rLl' \.rl .�iil X IY•!!'Pr[ IIOOJ RAHNCLIFF 1 ST ADDITION • aroru Itl. Yir•n room m .=.l/!• PIP.14 roxlnn ssl uo m.ue n r.l.l. tl. 1[iN —L�1—O[W.[f'nml. s f.Q[J 0[4CIrm N O.XOu ¢Vx m �tfuurm 1�O NN��[iplxa w Mri•ffi�[Yci} [ep.ml,. Xlnm.ol. p.rin. r. lo. mr^ .n. pr.prlel.r a In. oualN. a.a.lae IIM Ilu.blln u. wnl. ,nr, ..rl IIM Yrinwll W.rl.r .I IM II. bA au41.a [wYr� XI• IanYa b�N I1 IrrnYr's VIM brN .1 W.rl.r� Svu 0 Yvn.. .irwwl..Yl] .......... Illl.ni. [.r In1.M 1..11. U. Ia Mt .l Y.Irnlry. wiaiiii lii .mina ya a. ..er YNu .ni Na. a'IXa .1.1 r lull .M .I II III^Y w. YI,(.uto el Ln\ n Ywn u . ww. n,'.i ei'in r.. , w•w�°Inrll w n. �:i. 4. u X... nnwm Lm•Y. sun v .mmu tGYn p IMI. _dI.1 r.ye lA nl .Y a iu1.YY Yl.0 w 4r .1 el_.. r.nm..r ., 6. Mll.uu fap.nl, . .ol. wr4mrNlp.. r"lv .l nam.mlp.Y X Y b wn.. nrLll. Y Y4 .I .'1[w_. 4M L111 [wnll .1 L.yn. XIwYY Yrr.w. Ya rlu. R [alum o.bo 'mn. mx.bu you (siny.[Ilrw.ou b YIIw.n1 l..0 a..M I.. n.lu u1.M N I Xur.1 x1111 Un I Mu a MI .N Iluu. IM W4R11f .tl111101. _ YI sl 1. Ln I'UI bI.l1Y ..n[;a['1.1•^ I11 p .11'.aL.nel . N Is I1.1 l.el MIF•nalu..'I. '.I,rwNn. .11[o X. .w w ••[ al.0 fr... Mll.r . Iw nnry a.ie�:e w XIIM•u Lo 61I1N1.1 .N.r IMn .. .npn. a[tlnl Ytl. 4.\llluu "i.r 11 i .�nn[i'eilu. Nn n•l.i liu i.:.n plra. PI. ..nle [. r.un.eY1.N id..v. u Imwu LI[.n. Intl [�Y ��.• w�. lln[. r7.e I. �. �... YM sun a XlYlwu resin a xlvuu b l..e M •!11[. X .. IX Lal..lXn Ypin.rJul�tl� IYl ..r nu.. m.0 fsw.. Mu.YY. JAMES R. HILL, INC.I 40 F, 1 LJ Agenda I-nformation Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 85-M, FINAL ACCEPTANCE O. Project 85-M, Final Acceptance ('Wescott Hills 4th Addition - storm Sewer --As a part of the development of the Wescott Hills 4th Addition, an existing trunk storm sewer line had to be re- located. This work has been completed with all final inspections being performed by a representative of the Public Works Department and our consulting engineering firm, with a recommendation for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85-M (Wescott Hills 4th Addition - Storm Sewer) and accept for perpetual maintenance. Al Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PUBLIC -HEARINGS PROJECT 476, HIGHVIEW AVENUE - STREETS A: Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets -- In response to a petition received from several property owners who use Highview Avenue, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing bei g scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages -30 through is a copy of the feasibility for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. Enclosed on pages � through e� is a copy of the original petition submitted, requesting improve- ment of this section of roadway. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to those property owners who are proposed to be assessed under this project. This segment of Highview Avenue was originally proposed to be upgraded under Project 292 in 1980. At that time, the estimated rate per front foot was $21.00 with the final assessment rate being $19.24 per front .foot. The estimate contained in this report is very conservative based on the assumption that the majority of the existing gravel base will not be able to be salvaged due to the final subgrade evaluation along with the plan and profile design of the final street configuration. More detailed and accurate cost estimates can be obtained once detailed plans and specifications have been prepared and even moreso after formal bids have been received. The consulting engineer will be available to discuss this project during the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 476, Highview Avenue (Streets) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi- cations. 29 • • • REPORT ,M HIGHVIEW AVENUE (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 660' WEST STREET IMPROVEMENT�S PROJECT No. 476 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49396 Baned,&w, Ra&ws, f4.r4lria ap 4edac&,&d, ./"c. G' 49 t movda" 0 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636-4600 June 11, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) Street Improvements Project No. 476 Our File No. 49396 Dear Mayor and Council: urw n tlnnr,Pw,, P.I. Ruhr" W, xwrnr. P£. J.,h C. AndrdiA, Y.E. tlrud/urd A. Lrnrhrrx. P.E.. Xrrh.d E. Turnrr. 10E' Jwon C. of.. Y.E. (:Irnn X. CuuL, Y.G. Arran A. GwJun. I'.G. Inman !'. Nuys. Y.E xirhurd W. Lwrrq Y.E. Robrrr G. SchumMr, P.E. Marvin L. Swwlu. P.E. Maald C. Bwjardi. P.E. Jrrry A. tluwJun, P,E. W4 A. Ilurum, PE. I'rd X. Pvld, Y. E, hh, Awl T. Nuuurrunn. Y.E. E. IJand U. l.w/uw. PL: Iran.. W. Krr.nm, PE. AhrAarl C. L""h, P.E. Aurtn L. Wdlu. P.E. Sumo X, Mu/and. P.E. A'ennrrA P AnJrnun. P.E. AnrA A. tlmhmann, Y.E. Mur! X. Xol/J, P.E. Nuhn C. Xwwh. Ihumw E. An,., Y.E. Churls A. !'nW run Lr,, M- Pu W, Md.. M. oh.. Swan M. EbML Enclosed is our report for Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west), Project No. 476. This report covers street improvements and includes a pre- liminary assessment roll. • We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: June 11, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 r / Approved A • PP b Y Department of Pu.Alic Works Date: 5696d 30 Year 3 Anniversary ® SCOPE: This project provides for street improvement for the unpaved portion • 11 of Highview Avenue from Pilot Knob Road to a point 660' to the west. The pro- posed improvements include upgrading Highview Avenue to a residential standard (concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving) for streets in the City of Eagan. Highview Avenue is abutted on both the north and south side by six (6) single-family, platted parcels. This portion of Highview Avenue also serves as a major access to the homes in the Valley View Plateau Additions. Traffic counts recently taken by the City of Eagan measured the average daily traffic (ADT) at the east end of Highview Avenue to be 499 ADT while at the west end was 323 ADT. Although these traffic counts are well in excess of what should be encountered on a gravel road, they also indicate that 36% of the traffic is generated from the lots in the Highview Acres development. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Highview Avenue between Pilot Knob Road and a point 660' to the west of Pilot Knob Road is an existing gravel road. Water main and sanitary sewer were constructed in this section of Highview Avenue in 1968 and 1970, respectively. In 1980 storm sewer was extended from an existing storm sewer in Pilot Knob Road to the low point in Highview Avenue which is located at the westerly end of the project proposed herein. As part of that same project, Highview Avenue was also upgraded with concrete curb and bituminous surfacing from the westerly end of this project to Highridge Terrace. Page 1. 5696d 3Y • • • Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to upgrade Highview Ave- nue to a 32' wide butiminous street with concrete curb and gutter. It is assumed for purposes of this report the existing aggregate base is not of suf- ficient depth or cross section to be utilized in the upgrading of this street. It is also assumed common excavation will be required to construct the street to a proper elevation and cross section. Upon completing the required excava- tion a 6 inch thick Class 5 100% crushed aggregate base will be constructed, in conjunction with bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, manhole adjustment, and driveway and boulevard restoration. However, as part of the preparation of the plans and specifications a more detailed analysis will be done to better evaluate if the existing aggregate base can be utilized. In addition, it may be less costly to construct a thicker bituminous base course resulting in less excavation and aggregate base construction depending on the final design cross section of the road. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: 5696d Assessment and Construction Area SE 1/4 Section 4 Highview Acres Lot 1 Lot 2 (021-00) Lot 2 (022-00) Lot 7 (074-00) Lot 8 (081-00) Lot 8 (082-00) Page 2. 03 ® COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $47,670 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the coat of street on a front foot basis to the • Knob Road was upgraded in 1980. Therefore, as part of this project it is pro- posed that a 75 foot corner lot credit be applied to that frontage abutting Highview Avenue for Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00). REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue abutting property it serves. Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00) were previously assessed for their entire frontage abutting Pilot Knob Road at the time Pilot • Knob Road was upgraded in 1980. Therefore, as part of this project it is pro- posed that a 75 foot corner lot credit be applied to that frontage abutting Highview Avenue for Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00). REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Street $47,670 Street Assessment $47,6-70- 47,670$47,670 $47,670 $47,670 -0- All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there are no funds required from the major street fund. Page 3. 5696d 3f� KI • PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 5696d Page 4. 35 June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 Fall, 1986 Spring, 1987 May, 1988 APPENDIX A ® PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HIGHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' West) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 900 Cu. yda. Common excavation @ $3.00/cu. yd. $ 2,700 200 Cu. yda. Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu. yd. 1,000 100 Cu. yds. Select granular borrow @ $8.00/cu. yd. 800 950 Ton Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 6,650 210 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $14.00/ton 2,940 210 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $15.00/ton 3,150 25 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $200,00/ton 5,000 • 120 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 180 1,260 Lin. ft. Surmountable concrete curb b gutter @ $5.00/lin. ft. 6,300 6 Each Driveway restoration @ $500.00/each 3,000 6 Each Adjust MH and GV box @ $200.00/each 1,200 1,000 Sq. yds. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq. yd. 2,000 Total $34,920 + 5% Contingencies 1,750 $36,670 $ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin b Bond Interest 11,000 TOTAL...................................... $47,670 El Page 5. 5696d APPENDIX B ® PREL.IMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL HIGHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 C� is Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment HIGHVIEW ACRES Lot 1 205 (1) $44.55 9,133 Lot 2 (021-00) 165 44.55 7,351 Lot 2 (022-00) 165 44.55 7,351 Lot 7 (074-00) 330 44.55 14,702 Lot 8 (081-00) 65 (1) 44.55 2,896 Lot 8 (082-00) 140 44.55 6,237 1,070 $47,670 (1) A 75' corner lot credit was applied Page 6. 5696d 7 3 EXISTING STREET M C 2 v PROPOSED STREETIMPROVEMENTS Ir SURMOUNTAIgLE CONCRETE CURB 8 6 GUTTER 34 BACK TO BACK-� 22 (022-00) (021-00) 7 (074-00) so EXISTING --STREET STREET I I I I I I I I (082-00) (081-00) I II I END BEGIN CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CORNER LOT CREDIT .............. :::•ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 0 100' 200' Graphic Seale in Feet HIGHVIEW AVENUE (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 880' WEST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 478 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ri cr M O 2 Y SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date.JUNE, 1988 Comm. 49306FIG. No. 1 PP-63- I'm r-oT —C17 April 8, 1986 Tom Colbert Eagan Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom, I'm writing to call your attention to the deplorable condition of Highview Ave. in northern Eagan from Pilot Knob to approx- imately 600 feet west of Pilot Knob. As you may be aware, this section of Highview Ave. was left untouched in 1980 when the rest of the street was upgraded by installing curb, gutter, storm sewer and blacktop. In the spring this road becomes a quagmire of mud and potholes; summer brings almost unbearable dust as well as complaints to the Public Works Department requesting that something be done to settle the dust. These conditions contribute to extra- ordinarily high maintenance costs which are borne by all resi- dents of the city. This letter will serve as notice that a petition to upgrade this road is being circulated and will be brought to the Council for their thoughtful consideration and action within the next few weeks. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ed Martin 1474 Highview Ave. Eagan, MN 55121 Phone: 454-4193 7 z rl s yy 2� Mil S, Ed 1/4SEl!-4vT27jR23 • HIGHVIEW AVENUE PETITIONERS 12� A I 0 1 0 - 7 S City of E.,nli 020-75 rt .4 4 os v. PA 4"j, City of E ... n . . . . . . . . . . e ra J. X m ........... Ma P X. -x H1r,H vierY .............. ... ....... .. -A VE. Iw EK41.-r. ev,y, cc OAD UMT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DOC NO 333669 .... . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . ....... . . .. ................. .................. 9A , ..... . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . ............ HIGHVIEW ......... ......... ......... ...... . ..... ....... ... . ....... C) City of Eogan ......... ......... 094-00zin r. ........ .............. .... o . ......... ........... 6 t . . . . . . . . . . 0 L BRI D & E VIEW AVE . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . T.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j. . . : -X . . . . . . . . 0 10 - 7 t. E� 020 02 z 0j , e & 12� A I 0 1 0 - 7 S City of E.,nli 020-75 rt .4 4 os v. PA 4"j, City of E ... n . . . . . . . . . . e ra ... ....... X Ca,a/vzy 4. Ma P X. H1r,H vierY .. ....... .. .. EK41.-r. ev,y, cc OAD UMT DOC NO 333669 .... . . ..... . ....... . .. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . ....... . . .. ................. .................. 9A , 7 ............ ........... . . . . . . . . . . ............... ............ HIGHVIEW ......... ......... ......... ...... . ..... ....... ... . ....... C) City of Eogan ......... ......... 094-00zin r. ........ .............. .... o . ......... ........... 12� A I 0 1 0 - 7 S City of E.,nli 020-75 rt .4 4 os v. PA 4"j, City of E ... n ® TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED I` +' i srrr We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS -4/ _ ��74 ce 7C --/7S— () /Ji� 7 Y- 14-73 1y"PcJ' bsa- 30-:� 5 P 0, P0, I- L • TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED MAY 1 19210' We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface.. NAME ADDRESS 0l '" 9 �o7 7/ //7l i G -w -A �� O.cJ�i-ccs-L�� /`f .��J - 7�"�✓z1�_�J-' — � n U C 444 • TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED f"^y i 19uS We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS 1. P I � i .� b !9°J r .j-, S L ;Vro MAY ! TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME w ADDRESS C $�/-------- t �L -=-J-U & - N' 0' X1.71 U �&) tive_ �r� - LJ5u -6 y 53 '�)' 6 )- C --$,N- / y 3 6 - � Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen 1. • VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT, DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition --We have received a request from. the Rosemount School District #196 to vacate the existing watermain utility easement that is dedicated with the final plat for the above referenced subdivision. This easement is required to be vacated based on the final alignment of the watermain based on a sealed construction. A new easement has been described and conveyed to the City. As of this date, the staff has not received any object'to this proposed utility easement vacation. Enclosed on page w is a copy of the easements proposed to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and vacate the utility easement as described for the Deerwood School Addition. r 1 LJ • TJ,. NW Co n,• .f Ae NW. V41. f At S.6 %f of Sed'. Z/ Twpz?,? 6Z3) LOCATION MAG - ��6 �Y.IS-fi�JG �iSEME�T DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION no•/l. /.ne of l6r NW %*.ffFr 9.E. •/! of S•.lon Z/ ._`yf'.•'.:'17'� 09.99 .r• ,._._.�•rr:.L---'�' 8`a5cRWODP -------- 00 5 '. X31.98 ..... I ... E b y s..... Eu. A ti 1 is 4 bd.1°0 11 I ; u� r1 I'- \ ' _ Cn \t SECTION L TWP Z7 RLE 230¢"x' '� P%9eE 359 t jr �« GropFre Smk;n ful. ■RING R°QS.o �L pPO .55-55 17 -- a V . N! C,...., .f Al NW'/f 7NE. Co•nI• .i T1.e Ib Hd. •K l S«1»n U, 71 V Lf, RaE. 7J P.hA C...1, C.S.M. SH9•JJ'!/'E r 7A. ,le„16 /.:.r .i lA. NalF.rwf %/ .► /Ar 1 $.dh,.e1 %/ .f Sre/.e.. 11 TYP Z7RLE Z3 t_ TF,..rJF/.;. rA.NM'*.114SIC fSeel/en 7./,7Y/Z7,,feFZ3 A......./ /. F." . "";v .S Al. 8915, 4 * W. o Dr.o7n '/e in.F L� /IineF ,ion mend.nml 3.1..1 M/..rni..9ry,iln inn N Lrr /1(891. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen, VACATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BLACKHAWK GLEN IST ADDITION C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and :Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition --In response to a request received from the developer of the proposed Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the Council scheduled a public hearing to consider the vacation of certain portions .of an existing drainage and ponding easement to allow the development of residential property as a part of the 2nd Addition. Enclosedon page Vr is a copy .of the easements proposed to be .vacated. All notices have been published in the, legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected parties with no objections received to date. The Engineering Division has evaluated this request and determined that there would be no adverse impact to required storm water storage requirements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ,close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the drainage easement as described for Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition. • �7 BLACKH WK GLEN 1ST ADDITION EASEMENT SKETCH. �NM,n {I(pl rx[Mww rl rKtww (V,FCM fas, N 89°3 •�9•W 2230.88 - ip"p LwZ CI rlL wrwerM,ww wrzc `!: 1 o>. as wusuae, nwxer n.caxlwa ruts secono,°m n°xr R;-d.�. eu ~' � J a.a a.y ��' — — — —(—:`a.,orr •'°' .Qxi CO t=$ } w "S, �' . O U T L O T is ?'• .s. i ♦ 'a„ :l,} _ _ \• En .4 7� ,rrr u; . vr¢m rfre.pr F v. \ r'rR° ,/ >-ew.rxur°i nsaur Irk WIlk ���/ 'S � l•' ?�I / O TOUTL I ^°'5[°Wux,°[E.SEupiPp 0.,ia•'p0 O 'O OUTLOT e .E •a...I' �\\� C i � IO . ° , tlF' •�• �e 69 'SBB°5399`E' N 736 .0 „"a�ranS � 3•/g. R - �... °pe��.`f/ +5;°r.trou �� xera're c .g215� c x149.00 .e,su,E, 19n et°•ce,�°e. 'E,r9a P.._5�. °2.,.°%� s pi2192su sscc°i° / sim'.x`o ioo.5 'iccoxo aq'N4a'yV� • �7 b , awl x �_ / fSs ` / $�'� P . 2 (� \\ \ IIx .�d 1 i � xr�'yi•; ��'�etszYEJ L—'v=[� r��'` DENOTES AREA OF EASEMENT TO BE I \ �.� r/' ar B 1 x �a`ye', J fix "' %\\% / VACATED AND NOT COVERED BY(sb° E s is / `` Y., sJe /�`vs F io I \ \ `- 2♦ EASEMENT AFTER PLATTING. 356°xe y.,;. /i.- \ h�j n. y,4 7 ;I = ({ \ ._ ,: 2• 6xs p0.5 .r,Y- i' x/s• p I a .7 IS B -- —__- - - — .._-- t118 g5 t[ox°'�� �tia ✓ / \a_,I as""`55 5 10 66 / ti �' 7 f4. \ •"� 21 E a°. GP'338,6•w °�,...• 1 1 s 4aLLL.� ���•".s _ A PLSCE a, .erJ _ SAA C ouivrvcr ids` � �''." r \ Sl 8�y1�..`' °;A0\ \.� /•°q °j/ 3or N / a '� rte' „•: n :w 23 vl �: n.[x o.4—�,: 4`D• :`�:."'. sd G� \.• �P r' 16....ii it 's: s1 i_ �i l� � I{/f X71: � . �f� �[r 11.um� �rd� C r n 4� �.q• // I^ 9 al I-t..r—_l. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen 0 PROJECT 450, WILLIAMS & LARUE ADDITION —SANITARY SEWER D. Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer --On December 3, 1985, a public hearing was held to discuss the installation of sanitary sewer laterals to service the Williams and LaRue 1st and proposed 2nd Additions. As a result of that public hearing, wherein a preliminary assessment roll was prepared based on estimated cost, Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of plans and subsequent advertisement for bids. As a result of the bid opening held on June 27, it was determined that the cost to construct the sanitary sewer lateral, services and related restoration exceeded the estimate discussed at the public hearing. In accordance with Council policy, consideration of the award of the contract was continueduntil the affected property owners could be informed of the projected increased assessments and provided an opportunity to reevaluate the needs for the proposed improvement. Enclosed on pagey D is a copy of a letter sent out by our consultant engineer informing the people of this projected cost overrun_ and scheduling a meeting to be held on Thursday, July 10, to explain the information in further detail with final Council consideration on July 15. It is anticipated that the major discussion of the presentation of this item would pertain to the estimated cost and proposed alternates, rather than the entire project concept. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 450, Williams and LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer. • El 0 SPECIAL NOTE The letter from the Consulting Engineer to residents informing them of the cost overrun was not available for distribution with Friday's packet. It will be included with Additional Informa- tion on Monday, July 14. so Agenda Information Memo July 15, 19'86,, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen 40 PROJECT 473, PILOT KNOB ROAD - TRUNK STORM SEWER E. Public Hearing for Projcet 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer --With the proposed improvement and upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to south of Cliff Road, additional trunk storm sewer facilities will be required to handle the runoff generated from this improvement. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing being scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages_ through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. There Ire three distinct separate areas where trunk storm sewer will be installed or existing lateral storm sewer revised. With many property owners already being assessed for trunk area storm sewer, no additional assessments would be proposed except for those who have not previously paid their trunk area storm sewer assessment. However, if they were proposed to be affected by either the necessary acquisition of construction easements or inconvenienced by construction activity, the letter enclosed on page was sent out also notifying them of this public , hearing. A so, all notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to those property owners proposed to be assessed, inform- ing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer will provide detailed information pertaining to these proposed improvements and will be available to answer questions and concerns from the Council and public. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer, and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications - is • REPORT rm (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ® PROJECT N®. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49380 .SL /haw/, Mlwwedda '511Y • E • Bonestroo, Rose►ie, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 2, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Pilot Knob Road (Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park, City Hall) Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 473 Our File No. 49380 Dear Mayor and Council: Omo G. fi.ara o. P.E. Nuberr W. Rwenq P.E. JwrPh C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lembeq, P E. Rirhurd E. Turner, P.E. Jain. C. ORun, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P E. Keirh A. Gordon. P.E. Thmnm E. Bayo, 1•.E. Rirhurd W. Fwur. P.E R.&,, G..4hunicbr. P.E. Marvin L: Sarvala, P. E. Donald C. B. ,urdr. P.E. Jerry A. Ruurdun, P.E. Mark A. Harman, P.E. Ted K. field, P.E. Mlrhad T. Riarrnann. P.E- Rabrn N_ PJrJJrrlr. AL. Darld O. Lwl mu, P.E. Than,. W, Prlrrsan, P.E. Mirharl C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willa, P.E. Jane R. Midland, P.E. Kennah P Anderzan, PE A'rirh A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. RW'. P.E. Ruben C. Ruvek, A.I.A. Thurnaa E. Ars, a, P.E - ScnrrE.,YounK. P.E. Chdrla A. E'rirkaun Lm M. Nu W, Harlan M. Oaon Si a o; M. Ebrrlln Transmitted herewith is our report for Pilot Knob Road Trunk Storm Sewer Im- provements, Project No. 473. This report coveres trunk storm sewer and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00 RO ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of t e S to o Minnesota. Marc A. Hanson Date: June 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by impartment of Public Works Date: 6 - �/-� 1p 5456d �3 30 Year Anniversary • 0 • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer im- provements which are required at this time due to the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Cliff Road in 1987. The trunk storm sewer im- provements are located in 3 different areas along Pilot Knob Road and are in- cluded within or adjacent to Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park and City hall. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and only slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The revision proposes .that the NWL for Pond BP -15 southwest of Evergreen Park be lowered 6.4 ft. to 892.6 as compared to 899.0 as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This revision to the Master Plan is recommended for two reasons: 1. The low point of Sequoia Lane in Evergreen Park Addition can then 5456d be drained southwesterly into Pond BP -15 thus providing additional capacity within the existing 27" RCP located east of Pilot Knob Road through which this area presently drains. Based on design standards utilized today the existing 27" RCP is approximately 30% under design capacity for a 5 year storm based on its present drainage area. Therefore, redirecting the low point of Sequoia Lane to Pond BP -15 will provide additional capacity for the future storm sewer required in Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the con- struction of this line will provide better street drainage At the intersections of Sequoia Lane and Walfrid Street and Sequoia Lane and Lodgepole Drive where additional catch basins are proposed. Also redirecting this drainage area to Pond BP -15 will allow it to ,flow by gravity to the Minnesota River rather than through the Carlson Lake lift station where it would have to be pumped to Thomas Lake resulting in additional long term energy costs. Page 1. 0 2. The existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive presently discharges into Pond BP -16. However, the controlled elevation of Pond BP -16 is approximately 3' higher than the existing storm sewer in Lodge - pole Drive. Therefore, by constructing the outlet for Pond BP -15 at a lower elevation and through the existing storm sewer from Lodgepole Drive, this storm sewer can ultimately be drained dry, resulting in less maintenance in the future.. In addition, the de- sired normal water elevation of Pond BP -16 can be preserved as previously intended. It is recommended the project proposed herein be constructed as part of one contract. DISCUSSION: The project for discussion purposes is separated into 3 different areas. • Evergreen Park: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing storm sewer within Evergreen Park Addition from the low point in Sequoia Drive southerly along Sequoia Drive and then westerly along Lodgepole Drive to Pond. BP -15. It is also proposed to provide additional catch basins in the intersections of Sequoia Drive within Walfrid Street and Lodgepole Drive as shown on the at- tached drawing. In addition, it is proposed to construct a 12" diameter grav- ity storm sewer outlet from Pond BP -15 to an existing 21" RCP, which serves as the outlet for Pond BP -16 and conveys runoff from the Thomas Lake Elementary School site. The connection to the existing 21" RCP storm sewer will be at a location to provide sufficient grade and capacity to serve as the outlet for Pond BP -15. The 12" diameter storm sewer will also connect to the existing 27" RCP from Lodgepole Drive which presently discharges into Pond BP -16. This ® connection will allow the existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive to drain dry 5456d Page 2. 6� and also preserve the existing water elevation of Pond BP -16. Design consid- ® eration for Pond BP -15 are as follows: Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro- Comp. Proposal Comp. Proposed Plan posed Plan posed Plan Storage Plan Out -Outflow NWL NWL NWL HWL Storage (Ac.Ft.) flow cfs (cfs) Berry Patch Pond BP -15 899.0 892.6 901.6 894.7 3.0 2.4 1.0 0.5 Berry Patch Park: Storm sewer proposed for Berry Patch Park provides for con- structing a 12" diameter gravity storm sewer outlet from Mooney Lake ,(Pond JP -7) to Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9. Both Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -9 are included within Patrick Eagan Park. Pond JP -7 is abutted by residential homes to the south and east included in Hilltop Estates while to the north and west it is abutted by large unplatted parcels. However, the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 which also abut Pilot Knob Road are presently proposed to be developed. Therefore, as part of their development plans, they will also be required to interconnect Pond JP -36 to Pond JP -35 and Pond JP -35 to Pond JP -7. Pond JP -36 which abuts Pilot Knob Road will receive additional runoff as part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive. The lateral storm sewer proposed in Pilot Knob Road will be extended northerly and south- erly from Pond JP -36 and ultimately discharge to Pond JP -36. Therefore, due to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the proposed development of the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 and the current high water elevation flooding park property and trailways, it is necessary to provide an outlet for Pond JP -7 at this time. Design considerations for Pond JP -7 are as follows: Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Existing & Proposed & Proposed & Proposed Proposed Elevation NWL HWL Storage Outflow Pond JP -7 862.8 859.4 865.2 47.6 ac.ft. 1.0 City Hall: Storm sewer proposed at Eagan City Hall includes constructing a Isstorm sewer from the northwesterly corner of Pond JP -6 within an existing open Page 3. 5456d ditch towards City Hall as shown on the attached drawing. Presently, runoff • from Pilot Knob Road and a portion of the parking lot at City Hall is conveyed through this open ditch to Pond JP -6. However, those portions of the ditch which are at a steep grade are beginning to suffer severe erosion. Therefore, due to the additional runoff being directed towards this ditch resulting from the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary to construct storm sewer, in those portions of the ditch which are susceptible to erosion. However, be- cause of the uncertainty of how the property south of City Hall will develop, it is proposed to preserve the open ditch where it is constructed at flatter grade and erosion is less a concern. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for construction of the storm sewer for Hilltop Park and Evergreen Park. Storm sewer for City Hall is constructed on property owned by the City. Therefore, no easements are required. Parcel Permanent Temporary ® Description Easement Easement EVERGREEN PARK Thomas Lake School Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.18 acre 0.37 acre Thomas Lake Lot 7, Block 1 0.06 acre 0.13 acre Lot 8, Block 1 0.07 acre 0.13 acre - BERRY PATCH PARK Hilltop Estates Lot 1, Block 1 0.04 acre 0.16 acre Lot 2, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre Lot 3, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 0.06 acre 0.22 acre ® Parcel 016-54 0.05 acre 0.18 acre Page 4. 5456d 57 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ® ASSESSMENT AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 010-51 Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-53 Parcel 012-54 Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 SE 1/4 6 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park Page 5. 5456d CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-26 City of Eagan Parcel 013-26 City of Eagan SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan HILLTOP ESTATES Lot 1, 2, 3, Block l SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-85 City of Eagan Parcel 010-82 City of Eagan NE 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan THOMAS LAKE SCHOOL ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDN. Lot 7, 8, Block 1 EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 6 28, Blk. 1 Lots 3, 4 6 5, Block 4 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 6 22, Blk. 5 Lots 1 (012), 2, 7, 8 5 9, Block 6 ® COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is listed below: Evergreen Park $162,020 Hilltop Park 68,250 City Hall 39,810 $270,080 The total estimated project cost is $270,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess— period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as— sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. 5456d Page 6. 6y ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef— fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as— sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. 5456d Page 6. 6y TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are • as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Large Lot $0.50/sq.ft. (lst 16,500 sq.ft. of ea. ac.) Regional Park $0.025/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk Storm Sewer $270,080 Trunk Area Assessments $214,402 TOTAL $270,080 $214,402 -$55,678 It is anticipated -$55,678 will be required from the trunk storm sewer ® fund, It should be noted, however, that $92,355 of revenue is related to the proposed assessment to Patrick Eagan Park and Berry Patch Park which is con- sidered the City of Eagan. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report June 17, 1986 Public Hearing July 15, 1986 Acquire Easements Summer, 1986 Approve Plans and Specifications August, 1986 Receive Bids Sept., 1986 Award Contract Sept„ 1986 Construction Completion Spring, 1986 Assessment Hearing Summer, 1987 ® First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1988 Page 7. 5456d APPENDIX A • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD .(EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 473 A. EVERGREEN PARK 600 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. 250 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 250 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 1,380 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 11 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 1 Each 27" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each ® 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600-.00/each 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 2 Each Connect RCP to existing RCP @$ $600.00/each 30 Lin.ft. Water main relocation @ $20.00/lin.ft. 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 550 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @.$5.00/ton 60 Lin.ft. Concrete curb and gutter @ $12.00/lin.ft. 6,000 Sq.yds. Boulevard sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 0.5 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest ® TOTAL EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION .................... Page 8. 5456d $ 21,600 8,000 7,000 33,120 12,100 4,800 1,000 600 800 1,200 600 15,000 2,750 720 9,000 400 $118,690 5,940 $124,630 37.390 $162,020 B. BERRY PATCH PARK (Pond JP -7 to Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9) ® 1,350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/lin.ft. 4 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/cstg. @ $500.00/each LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. 16 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 3.0 Acres Seeding @ $800.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest TOTAL HILLTOP PARK ................................ C. CITY HALL 150 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 150 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 540 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 1 Each 24" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 1 Each 21" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $,700.00/each 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 600 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 2.0 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest ® TOTAL CITY HALL .................................. Page 9. 5456d Y $ 37,800 2,200 2,000 4,000 1,600 2,400 $ 50,000 2,500 $ 52,500 15,750 $ 68,250 4,200 3,900 12,960 3,300 800 700 :11 1.600 $ 29,160 1,460 $ 30,620 9.190 $ 39,810 SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,_340 3,494,200 $0.025 $ 87,355 Regional Park Page 10. 54564 WE APPENDIX B • PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, HILLTOP PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS . PROJECT NO. 473 Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 183,990 Large Lot 75,750 $0.05/s.f. $ 3,788 Parcel 010-51 42,790 Large Lot 16,500 0.05/s.,f. 825 Parcel 020-51 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Parcel 040-51 163,360 Large Lot 49,500 0.05/s.f. 2,475 Parcel 050-51 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Parcel 060-51 161,500 Pond (152,750) 8,750 0.05/s.f. 438 Parcel 010-52 621,335 Pond ( 40,100) 581,235 0.05/s.f. 29,062 Parcel 010-53 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Parcel 012-54 110,100 --- 110,100 0.05/s.f. 5,,505 Parcel 014-54 202,620 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 015-54 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 016-54 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 010-00 336,000 Pond (236,000) 100,000 0.05/s.f. 5,000 (Berry Patch Park) SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 $0.05/s.f. $ 16,552 Parcel 010-84 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 0.05/s.f. 16,552 Parcel 011-85 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 011-86 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 012-86 449,380 Future R/W (20%) 359,500 0.05/s.f. 17,975 TOTAL ......................................... $122,047 SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,_340 3,494,200 $0.025 $ 87,355 Regional Park Page 10. 54564 WE • • 5456d /Page 11. ( NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012-04 PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARCEL NO. ® SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 010-79 Parcel 010-81 Parcel 010-82 Parcel 010-83 Parcel 012-85 • • 5456d /Page 11. ( NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012-04 • POND BP -17 NWL=897.1 HWL= 892.0 21 22 u 23 8 � i 24 71 1 25 26 - 1 ' 1 27 ' 28 - oilHW D 90819 sl N 0 100, 200' L_I ET X10-00 PARK) I 11 10 s B 7 12 14 15 6 13 '[�' m svzl� s S I. -- I AOAPY�LITS I tin 8 M Z 7 6 Of FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT 4 5 U KNOB ROAD) 6 WILDERNESS POND BP -15 SEWER NWL= 892.6 HWL•894.7 POND BP -14 Q NWL• 899.0 O HWL•901.1 0: m 0 Z Y PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS • (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1986 Comm. 49380 FIG. NO. I • s C� 0 500 GroOhiC Stale in Feer �Y= CITY OF EAGAN E 0 010-81. 010 -82 = 011- 85Nr f 016-54 015-54 014-54 040-51 POND JP -7 NWL=859.4 HWL=865.2 050-51 010-5t FUTURE STORM SEWER - 020-51 i r 014-50 FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD)-, POND Jf 9 NWL= 810.7 HWL=831D.0 OSED 12rr M SEWER 010-83* NWL= 819.2 HWL=830.0 012-85>K PROPOSED 12° ,,,,--PROPOSED SEWER Ex. STORM SEWER tl, 1 3Q IVA-- ERRY / PATCH PARK 060-51 010-00* (MOONEY LAKE) 010-53 010-84 d Z 012-86 0 U v , >>, ❑ O 0o a lam, PONDOND Pi 010-52 , POND i. JP -36 PILCri�~ ^Ivvo RI (Co. Rd. No. 31) PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS • (HILLTOP PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1986 FIG. No. 2 Comm. 49380 PATRICK EAGAN PARK — 0' goo G10>AN hON N lwl • CITY a EAGAN LEXINGTON AVE LEXINGTON WAYI i (Co. Rd. N 43) ST. JOHN NEUMAN ADDITION 010-00* IF (Co. Rd. No. 31) F PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN. MINNESOTA b91 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineere St. Paul. Minn_ Dato:JUNE, 168 Comm. 46380 FIG. No. 4 e-; t� IU�I 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOM9UIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN .WMES A SMITH VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER CouncY Nambers THOMAS HEDGES July 3, 1986 city rr mIn0ww EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city chit Re: Project 473, Pilot Knob Road Upgrading/Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements — Evergreen Park & Berry Patch Park Dear Property Owner: This letter is to inform you that on July 15 at 7:00 P.M., a public hearing will be held at the Eagan City Hall to discuss the proposed project providing for storm sewer construction, installation and modifications necessary to handle storm water runoff associated with the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road in 1987. While the City does not propose assessing you for any costs associated with this project, the Council would like to hear any of your comments or concerns since you are located within the proposed construction area and may be affected by temporary construction easements and/ or inconvenienced by construction activity. Enclosed you will find a sketch plan showing the concept plan of construction that will be discussed at this public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the proposed alignments, location, scheduling, etc., please try to have a representative attend the meeting of July 15, 1986 when all these items will be discussed in detail. Sincerely, Public Works Department/ TAC/dk Enclosures q THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Twenty OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES F. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the June 17 City Council meeting, specific direction was given to the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses that are issued in other communities that do not restrict the number of off -sale liquor licenses issued. The City Clerk's office was asked to prepare a response to the City Council direction For a copy of the directive and response, refer to pages -,7/ --through Also enclosed on pages through�are letters from two (2) residents addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding, their position on changing the off -sale liquor license ordinance. There are two (2) alternatives being given consideration by the City Council for the regulation of off -sale liquor licenses. The first alternative is to limit the number of off -sale liquor licenses at five (5) and further that those licenses would be issued at the discretion of the City Council within established geographic boundary guidelines. The number of off -sale liquor .------licenses could only be changed in the future by ordinance amendment. The second alternative is to eliminate the number of off -sale liquor licenses within the City. If this alternate is given consideration, the City Council has discretion to attach certain regulatory guidelines. The City Council could adopt one or several of the following guidelines: 1) specific geographic boundaries, 2) each community shopping center and/or sub -regional center will be allowed on off -sale liquor license, 3) a distance factor such as one-half or one mile between off -sale liquor store establishments, 4) so many licenses per population (our current population is approximately 35,500). With five (5) licenses, the ratio is one (1) license per 7,000 people. 5) a per license ratio based on household units (our current number of household units is 12,500. The current ratio based on five licenses is one license per 2,500 households. Mr. Dave Perrier asked that research he has compiled be submitted for review by the City Council. Enclosed on pages%% through is a copy of Mr. Perrier's information. -'-T ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To 1) amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance by removing the limit of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted in the City and, further, consider certain •regulations if the cap is lifted, or 2) decide to not amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance and keep the off -sale liquor license number at five (5). MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE VANOVERBEKE ® FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 24, 1986 SUBJECT: OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE STUDY At the June 17 City Council meeting, any further consideration to remove the ceiling or cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses available for issuance was continued until the July 15 City Council meeting. The purpose for continuing this item was to allow the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses if the caps are removed. Please arrange to have a study compiled that would address the following issues: 1. What are the restrictions enforced in other cities if there is no cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that are issued? 2. Are there control factors such as distance from schools or churches? 3. Provide any demographic information that might be helpful for the review of off -sale liquor licenses. • Information was recently compiled by Federal Land Company that might be helpful as you prepare this study. In addition to the aforementioned questions, I would like you to ask for copies of city ordinances and review with city clerks the limit of control enforced by a city council if caps are removed on the number of off -sale liquor licenses. City Administrato ' TLH/kf • -71 pFG-SA�� L�Quo�2 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES! :FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT DATE:JULY 7, 1986 SUBJ:OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSES Staff has reviewed off -sale liquor licensing practices in other metro area communities, the state licensing law and demographic information pertinent to off -sale licensing. Findings of that review are as follows: I. Restrictions in other cities. A.Eight suburban communities which have not set number limits on off -sale licenses were contacted. 1. Bloomington (81,831 pop. (1980) has 25 active licenses and sets no restrictions other than zoning. The liquor stores must be located in commercial areas. The City Clerk noted that many liquor stores are located on Lyndale Ave. and that several of these had been in business for many years. 2. Burnsville (35,674) has eight active licenses. Their City Code states that the liquor store must be in a free standing building and cannot be located within one mile of one another. 3. Golden Valley (22,775) has had eight active licenses for several years. The City does not allow an off -sale business in an on -sale .:.operation, but it is okay to locate in a strip shopping mall. 4. Inver Grove Heights( 17,171) has seven off -sale establishments and there are no specific requirements. There are several stores along Concord".Street, some directly across from one another, that have been co -existing for years. 5. Maple Grove (20,525) has four active off -sale liquor stores, all operating in shopping mall locations. There have been no.complaints about the system as it currently operates, but Maple Grove does plan to review their entire liquor ordinance in the near future. (Maple Grove's population is now 30,000, which closely patterns Eagan's growth.) 6. Plymouth (31,615) has eleven licenses which the clerk felt was a reasonable number for the approximately 40,000 residents.(1986 est.) The only restriction is there be.no liquor store within 300' of any school, church or residential zone. 7. St. Louis Park (42,931) has nine licenses with no restrictions on locations other than zoning. The council may caution against lo- cating near another liquor store as not being prudent, but there is no law against doing so. ® 8. Shoreview (17,300) has four licenses. The population has since increased to 22,000 but there have been no requests for additional licenses. v B. The people responsible for licensing in_ the eight communities generally agreed that.the market essentially sets the number of licenses. These_ cities have had few requests beyond the number of licenses already active. It is within the Council's perogative to request that the applicant undertake a market .study in order.to gauge the proposed liquor store's chances for success. II. Control factors. State statute MS340.413 does not allow a liquor store within 300' of a school or a church. There are no state restrictions regarding the number of licenses per population as is the case with on -sale licenses. III. Demographics A. Zones where off -sale liquor is allowed is shown on the attached map. Off -sale is a permitted use in retail shopping centers of Neighborhood Business (NB), Community ShoppingCenter(CSC) and . Regional Shopping Center (RSC) districts. It is.a conditional use in a General Business (GB) District. ® There are P.U.D.s with underlying zoning which allow off -sale liquor. Actual development is not in keeping with the underlying zoning de- creasing the possibility that a retail shopping center will be constructed. B.The revised Geographic Boundaries, for off -sale licenses which were ,approved July 16, 1985, are also shown. The Council approved two licenses in the southwest area, one in.the southeast and one in the north. The Council approved an additional license for the north central area on May 6, 1986. C.Approved sites for off -sale liquor stores are indicated by stars. %3 0 iA L N 0 APft Y/ll %%iiiy/ 1 p •� v n t Q � � s I• a.'�'"� I T Y O F E A G A N - OFF SALE LIQUOR �g Zones where offz�sale liquor is an allowable use. - Five zpproved sites (Outlined zones indicate a F.U.D. with appropriate underlying zoning.) 7� EMM Geographic boundaries for off -sale liquor licenses approved 7/16/85. 0 July 2, 1986 Holly Sperr 4448 Johnny Cake Ridge Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Mayor Bea Blomquist Members of the City Council City of Eagan, Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and Council Members: I would like to go on record as being strongly opposed to the changing of the off -sale liquor licensing ordinances within the City of Eagan. I do not want the City of Eagan to look like, for instance, Lyndale Avenue in Bloomington where there is off -sale liquor establishment upon off -sale liquor establishment. For this governing body to say they will regulate,even with unlimited numbers available for purchase,is opening up the City for ® lawsuits should there be denial of the license request. I was employed by the City of St. - Paul Licensing Division for 7 years. I speak from experience when I relate the following. To stipulate in this proposed ordinance the restrictions such as churches, schools, residential areas, etc., is not sufficient, you are "opening up a can of worms". Lawsuits will cost money to us taxpayers. Zoning laws can be changed and that will serve as a potential problem. My main concern with this ordinance,, again speaking from experience, is that you will, be cutting the throats of the small business people that currently hold these licenses.. It is a very difficult business to be in and by adopting this proposed ordinance you are going to make in almost impossible for the small business person to operate in our City. Please do not do that - they have cared enough to open up establishments and to run them as best they can and do not need chain liquor stores that can afford to run them out.of business and then make their profit. Our City should care about the small business person and not do this to them - or to us, the taxpayers. Sincerely, 6G�® Holly perr Please submit this letter as part of the record at the Council Meeting/Hearing to be held on July 16, 1986. Thank you. 7� ® Easter Lutheran Church James P. Borgschatz, Pastor Thomas H. Johnson, Pastor July 1, 1986 City Council of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Council Members: 4200 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 (612)452-5200 AL 2 1986 I recently read about the discussions concerning liquor licenses in Eagan. I oppose the "free market" approach to granting liquor licenses because it is not responsible and will predictably lead to instability in the ® community with stores starting and then going out of business. It will also lead to greater financial pressures on the smaller stores which will result in the greater access of liquor to minors. I am not opposed to liquor stores. And I agree that the current system is cumbersome and time-consuming as Mr. Smith indicated. I urge the Council to adopt an ordinance plan for the number of liquor stores that is tied to the population (perhaps to numbers of households). To reduce the unfair aspects of the "free market" approach, a minimum distance between stores could also be pursued. Several persons in this congregation have similarly expressed their views. Government need not abandon responsibility and good planning in order to satisfy the principles of the "free market." Government is also charged with the responsibility of seeking the "greatest good for the greatest number." And thank you for your many hours of public service in making Eagan not just a good place to live, but an exceptionally good place to live. Sincerely, James P. Borgschatz s � ® JPB/kkp 74 • Highlighted in yellow is a supplement to Federal Land's "Off Sale License Information" that they have submitted. Please note there are restrictions to many of these City's liquor policies that have not been included in this information. Such as distance restriction between stores like Burnsville, Arden }fills, Minneapolis. Also, population regulations in some cities such as Cottage Grove, St. Paul and Minneapolis. There are some cities who have both of these restrictions, like Minneapolis. We have also filled in the column "No. of Persons Per License" for the Municipal stores. This information should not have been omitted because the stores are city owned. This still tells us how many stores are serving a particular area..for comparison. In calling and talking with many of these "No Limit" communities, many of the City's employees have stated that eventhough their policy reads "No Limit", every potential license must go in front or the City Council for an approval or disapproval, "becoming a timely and ® costly procedure" Addressing concerns regarding "Constitutional Rights of the Free Enterprise System", The liquor Industry cannot be compared to other retail stores. This industry has many more controls and restrictions placed on them by the Federal, State and Local Governments. No other retail business in taxed as high (8.59,) an now a proposed hike of 7% by the end of the year, no other industry is required to pay all there distributors in 30 days or be shutdown from any wholesaler being able to sell to them. No other business carries the added responsbility to the community not to sell to. teenagers and intoxicated individuals that drive our streets. We do need a policy in Eagan, but not one that opens up the industry for anyone to come in and sell. The communities that have this policy put it in force many years ago when the industry had little regulations and there was not nearly the emphasis on liquor control. We need a policy with a one -mile minimum distance requirement and also based on population. This would allow the City to expand the number of off -sale liquor stores in the community as the population grows, while insuring a controlled liquor environment. Dave and Pat Perrier is I C� OFF SALE -LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818. Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 Opt, must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No Limit other stores, schools & churches) 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (A1so,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire 16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley .22,775 No Limit 8 2,847 Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 (Council reserve the right to No Limit 2 2,648 approve or disapprove, only 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people 54 6,869(Also,' mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one 3,323 licenses for the City .has been approved. No restriction.) Limit 3 1,108 Oakdale 12,123"' No Limit 3 4,041 Plymouth 31,615 No Limit' 11 2,874 Richfield 37,851 Municipal Only. 3 12,617 Robbinsdale 14,422 Municipal Only 1 14,422 St. Louis Pk. 42,931 No Limit 9 4,770 St. Paul, 2701230 1/5,000 people 58 4,659 Shoreview 17,300 No Limit 6 2,883 Stillwater 12,290 No Limit 0 1 0 12,290 (City Council W. St. Paul a roval 18,527 necessary) 8 8 2,316 Woodbury ,,,10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figares are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED' -BY THE STAFF LISTED OF FEDERAL LAND COMPANY,BY CONTACTING EACH •CITY ABOVE. • o --,u /7 o /)4�� '11-7 � - C? / 0 • 0 6c� � Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -One OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70 A. Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (.Curtis Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/ Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986, City Council meeting, authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action continued the license to allow for a public hearing and potential amendment to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm five (5.) off -sale liquor licenses or remove the ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted within the community. With the continuation of the public hearing at the June 17, 1986, meeting, this item was also continued,. If action is now taken under Item F., Public Hearings, to remove the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications, this 'license can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the five (5), then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing the off -sale liquor' license maximum from four to five as acted upon -by the City Council at the May 6 meeting, • En,closed without page number is a copy of the application and police officer's report that were included with the June 17 packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor license for Curtis 0. Johnson for location at the Town Centre/Eagan Shopping Center. 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 198.6, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments --A Solid Waste Abatement staff report was completed on April 1, 1986, by Admin- istrative Assistant Hoher.stein. A recommendation was included in the report to appoint a Solid' Waste Abatement Commission comprised of nine (9) members. The purpose for the Commission is to meet on an ad hoc basis as a factfinding body to explore solid waste abatement alternatives. As stated in the report "its end would be the generation of a recommended solid waste abatement strategy and policy for the City. The make-up of the Commission was proposed as follows: 1) private citizens (3), 2) refuse haulers (2), 3) small business (1), 4) large business (1), 5) local government (1), 6) public service organiza- tion (1). At the direction of the City Council, an article appeared in the May newsletter explaining the purpose of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, the recycling program of the City and also a solicitation to this commission. It was also discussed by the City Council that due to the specialized nature of the Commission, openings would be advertised' in the City newsletter as opposed to using the library of names. Since interest in serving on this commission has been limited to date and recognizing the importance of proceeding with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, it is suggested that the size of the Commission be reduced to five for purposes of appointment. The City Council could reserve the right to expand the membership if additional citizen or business representatives are interested in serving in future months. Those persons expressing an interest in serving on the Commission are as follows: 1) Darlene Barr, private citizen, who resides at 2081 Marble Lane, 2) Larry Knutson, refuse hauler, of Knutson Rubbish Service, 3) Tom Mann, small business, who resides at 1231 Carlson Lake Lane and is the owner of the Greenskeepers business, 4) Jon Hohenstein, local government, and 5) additional business representative to be recommended by the Chamber of Commerce prior to the meeting on Tuesday. The City Administrator will be attending Solid Waste Abatement Commission meetings on behalf of the Mayor and City Council All the persons listed above have expressed interest in serving on the Commission and would accept an appointment by the City Council. A copy of a letter from Lar-ry Knutson is enclosed on page Mr. Mann and Ms. Barr have discussed their appoint- ment by t lephone. In summary, it is recommended that the Commission be organized and these appointments be made at the July 15 City Council meeting. The total number of Commission members can either remain at 9 or be reduced to a number between 5 and 9. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider appointments to the Solid Waste Abatement Commission and, secondly, give consideration to readjusting the number of representatives on the Commission. • • Since 1961 RUBBISH SERVICE M3 15120 CHIPPENDALE AVE., ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 (612)423-2294 JUN 5 1986 June 3, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd P.O. Box 21-199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom, ® I would like you to know that if the Waste Abatement Management Commission is interested-in-having_a.haul- er become a member I would be very interested in that position. I LJ I believe it is important to have a representative from our industry on your Commission to help give some in- sight into the unique challenges that we would be facing. S'/,Jer ly, 7�cG1ti'�v arry Knutson President KNUTSON RUBBISH SERVICE, INC. P7 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three PLEDGE AGREEMENT & PROGRAM DOCUMENT FIRST=TIME HOMEBUYERS PROGRAM A. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/HRA First -Time Homebuyers Program --During the fall of 1985, the City of Eagan. authorized the Dakota County HRA to undertake a $10,000,000 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. Early in 1986 a request was made by. the HRA to the City of Eagan to pledge revenues from the 1980 single-family mortgage revenue bond program for the purpose of reducing costs associated with the financing and acquisition of single-family homes for each first-time homebuyer. In order to the Dakota County HRA to proceed with the bond sale, a resolution must be adopted that authorizes and directs the execution of an assign- ment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single- family mortgage revenue bond in 1980 in the amount of $300,000 to the 1986 $10,000,000tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. As a part of that action, the City Council is adopting the program document for the 1986 bond sale. Enclosed in each City Council packet without page number is a copy of the resolution and program • document. If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact this office at any time, .. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a pledge agreement directing execution of an assignment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single-family mortgage revenue bonds, Series 1980, and authorization of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 1986 Single -Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. M Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four WAIVER OF PLAT/B.H. GRACE CORPORATION B. Waiver of Plat ('B.H'. Grace Corporation) Duplex Lot Split --The B. H. Grace Corporation has made application for a waiver of plat to allow lot splits for duplexes located on Vienna Lane. Fo_V a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages through ACTION TO BE CONSSDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for the B.H. Grace Corporation for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, and Lot 5, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition. R RM CITY OF EAGAN • SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: RONALD EBB (B.H. GRACE CORPORATION) LOCATION: L 1 & 2, BL 2, L 5, BL 3, RAHN RIDGE EXISTING ZONING: R-2, DOUBLE WITHIN MISSION HILLS P.D. (77-1) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 15, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 8, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting waivers of plat for 3 lots in the Rahn Ridge Addition. All 25 duplex lots meet or exceed the 15,000 S.F. per lot and the 100' width. The existing duplexs on lots 1 and 2 of block 2 and lot 5 of block 3 meet code setback requirements and have separated utilities. All three lots are served by Vienna Lane. • If approved, these waivers of plat shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. RAHN RIDGE - _ )7",, I.. • tw�r rte. _ .� \ a MANN . RN OAD a• .� .__ear. .. ..:.�_�.�_ _...-. ._��_'`�. .•. i- o4y' } .� A _W a> i . C !- - _ )7",, � • tw�r rte. mss+ ar•r'n .__ear. .. ..:.�_�.�_ _...-. ._��_'`�. .•. o4y' } f . C !- j O n - VIENNA ~'- r• )7",, LANE .__ear. .. ..:.�_�.�_ _...-. ._��_'`�. .•. VIENNA ~'- r• )7",, LANE i 10 VIENNR LANE o .)5- 9!1 9)0-f IVo•a0'3TW 11001 [5D 53.00 53.01 9u O 1 � I I I 1 1�9=." BU3$ c I [ 1532 i0'a� 5 5 GD.o9e I \\ 0 ! 5 1 j 2L 113. C� D 33 CU SL I T 35L O 55.00 G 55.00 30 II0 00 NORTH `-7.7 9z4 VIENNR LRNE 'L9j DO ED - NORTH loo 00 50.00 p� 50.00 929 0 � 1 i 22 _ y GRR `9_70.♦ 17.66I m 1 17.66 P I pD j £a�sGn9 Bui/�i n�f P 01 tI 3a *5= I 0 't4 1977 9z7s I o v o -4 o 50.00 t SO.pp 100.00 NORTH r 9 l r9? 6. VIENNR r Ou 70.94 b S ♦ ON 9510 + 0 6��o9e 5 9)05 O NN I M ER/S�i IJON � u+ Sc N T- I 3B-1 1 - 929 a 56 1 r �n 4 �J SL — O w 70,94 NORT, LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se `-7.7 9z4 VIENNR LRNE 'L9j DO ED - NORTH loo 00 50.00 p� 50.00 929 0 � 1 i 22 _ y GRR `9_70.♦ 17.66I m 1 17.66 P I pD j £a�sGn9 Bui/�i n�f P 01 tI 3a *5= I 0 't4 1977 9z7s I o v o -4 o 50.00 t SO.pp 100.00 NORTH r 9 l r9? 6. VIENNR r Ou 70.94 b S ♦ ON 9510 + 0 6��o9e 5 9)05 O NN I M ER/S�i IJON � u+ Sc N T- I 3B-1 1 - 929 a 56 1 r �n 4 �J SL — O w 70,94 NORT, LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se 100.00 NORTH r 9 l r9? 6. VIENNR r Ou 70.94 b S ♦ ON 9510 + 0 6��o9e 5 9)05 O NN I M ER/S�i IJON � u+ Sc N T- I 3B-1 1 - 929 a 56 1 r �n 4 �J SL — O w 70,94 NORT, LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se C� 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15,, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five AMENDMENT/DAKOTA COUNTY BANK PYLON SIGN PERMIT C. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 Square Feet of Additional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign for Dakota County Bank --The City has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank requesting an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center along Cliff Road. For additional in on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pagesthrough _�CL. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THISITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to the Dakota County State Bank pylon sign for additional square footage. WA ® MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM L STURM, PLANNER I DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK SIGNAGE AMENDMENT (LOT 2, BLOCK 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK) Staff has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank for an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Centex along Cliff Road. A conditional use permit was approved for this sign on February 25, 1985 and condition 3 stated that the sign shall be no more than 20' in height and shall not exceed 70 square feet in sign area. This reader board pylon sign now has the allowable. 70 square feet per side. The additional sign should fit nicely in the remaining open area and no other signage is being requested. Typically, 125 square feet of sign area per side is permitted on pylon signs. The $2.50/S.F. sign fee has been submitted with the application. If approved, this amendment shall include this sign (2'5 S.F.) only and the 95 S.F./side will not be increased in the future. Pla ner cc: Elmer Borgschatz JLS/jeh • , 6 • T I 3 EX/ST/NG s/GN s' x /o" - i WTANT tJISH 516N� _ /1 C-T,4c F/CLE12 FRAME C D. BRonIzE) 8[ 36[ /0 I' IW LoeaY..,' -WN�TE LETtERS SIGN LAYOUT PROPbSAL SY, ATTRACTA SIGN, INC. 6407 PENN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55423 57.," . r METnL F, fFF-17-1 FTM l — n-' Hiram P. of LEtt[U . FLL �� -Tewe.T 4.Gu1' A7 R89uIrSEO 'F£1UF2 cS - i WTANT tJISH 516N� _ — n-' Hiram P. of LEtt[U . FLL �� -Tewe.T 4.Gu1' A7 R89uIrSEO 'F£1UF2 cS Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REZONING/OVERHILL FARM 1ST ADDITION D. Rezoning (Overhill Properties, Inc.) from R-2 (Residential Double,) to R-1 (Residential Single) for Certain Lots in Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 24, 1986,.to consider a rezoning application submitted by Mr. David Dehler, Overhill Properties, Inc., for a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms lst Addition from R-2, Residential Double District, to R-1, Residential Single District. The Advisory Planning Commission is r_ce�ommending that the rezoning be granted. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy's enclosed on pages through. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(.$) X76 There is no change in parkland dedication fees proposed for this rezoning. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for certain lots within Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition. 0 • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MR DAVID OEHLER, OVERHILL PROPERTIES INC LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, BLOCK 2, OVERBILL FARMS 1ST ADDITION,, SWq, SEC 25 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 - DOUBLE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 2.4, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 17, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The application submitted is a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition„ from°R-2, Residential Double District, to R=1, Residential Single District. COMMENTS': Presently, there are existing duplexes on- Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Overhill Farm lst Addition. Therefore, there has been some development in this block and some continuity should be retained in this area. It appears that nothing, is • constructedeast of Block 4 through Block 7, of 'which there is a single-family home constructed .on Lot 7.. If a rezoning should occur, possibly Lots 5 through 7 could be ''rezoned to single family and continue the single-family line to Lot 4. I;t would then be suggested that Lots 1 through 4 would' then remain R-2 or duplex lots, up to where Hay Lake Road intersects with Dodd Road. This would appear to make more continuity and flow within the development versus isolating two duplex lots in this sub- division - The request would be to rezone all of the lots from R-2 to R-1 or a portion of the _lots as suggested by the staff report. Because of the rezoning requests, there are no specific conditions attached to this zoning change. -- DCR/j'j 93 • C, I N I 3 „� 4 YILNUI NILL NNF SCXWIXI - L.FE VIPF LRRFSIO( ` M �) O ya t 3 `\S� IJa e •y fi \ ���� �j wurm � 7 OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION � r • • ' 1 � � l � � lY apL4eTl91/a LD:X {Y M WCN r r • ' 1 r f • \�".n! i ADY PIPs MD SY=04'r RA r j ; • , I ; • 1 i j / n;H..� l` 1 AND MARCID LT l{ilLT0.4 --•--•-r-- • • r I • ,•�J� i:p r r ♦ ``• • .i:: ./ TIMlw I Np. IOTL1, u L . - \ '1' '1 OTNY.WIO{ SNOW , a '• 1 TH! !L{I• LIu{ OP YNa i • i i ffr.r.l L' N Lt Y�Dr nIe LWIL,Irc. Ls.a1.H _- i • ; I � i.: l O Ij - NwIGIui or e0'IL'►O•{ I ' qY.n LY ;DJ ii r • I V ___�_. _-J • r I t-. .� { O — •—ACCGVJ,D .CAT o DANOTA COUNTY I • .. r r I IIY ( i 7.0� X• 1 1 I O r i F � � r \ r i �• a )•�• I II! pL.WAia wD JTUTY lA1WLX1{ \ • � � ° !03b Ac �: 1174 AL i 2 Lu a..o..H TNw \\ •' '•. D3o4 r� y IOBIAC 1 l 10 1 I \ N t 1 1 D-36 Ad. 1 f /) .1�4JOI m Pu, N wID,N w AD `(FI ,B" tyµ 411 ,472 • / ! / LD.11IT LT a{L, LMD LuW o \\V s 4 I, k ., • DSo44 i JOMM• LOT HDICA P. V •,L'1 �� ��,�I_ �_ a D 37A I:, o � .�,; v� :{ pTMl0.ML{ INDICl�T1D. o ♦ R ,{ \ s. `•I bZ AL., ° .�i a EENCH MARK - \,\4I[. ELEVATION 955.77 \ \ U .. IS •, M TN{ L.W. ODADLIJIT DODO {O10 AND GLIPP {JAD ! C..., fT/.TG r Al. W"'AY _ a ..vNTY ! �TG'!E \ PIL .M..� lHli•H!V<j��-a r�J S.." ISN PII • •• M M a 1 INCH . ep P21T SECTION 24.TZ7, FZ7 I ,IL IyT' Zvi 1t41a •r• `� Nn` i / LOC4TION1 •M APN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® preliminary plat, a variance from the parking requirements would be necessary. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of Town Centre 100 Second, Addition, consisting of Lots 1 and 2, and Outlot A for future commercial development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a maximum. of 1 driveway along Denmark Avenue in line with the previously approved Burger King driveway and a maximum of 2 driveway accesses along Town Centre Dr, with the appropriate setbacks and separations, and Lot 2, Block 1, be allowed 1 access driveway onto Town Centre Drive with the appropriate separation. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 4. A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submitted and not released until one year after completion. The landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan at the time of final plat. 5. The developer shall be responsible for a 6 foot sidewalk along Town Centre Drive. 6. The trash container shall be incorporated into the building for the ® convenience of the occupants, and aesthetics of the site. All voted yes. Mulrooney moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance for a reduction of 4 parking spaces based on staff recommendations regarding green space. All voted yea. OVERBILL PROPERTIES, INC. - REZONING The public hearing was then convened regarding the request of Overbill Properties, Inc. for rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 of Block 2, Overbill Farms lst Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, in the northeast quadrant of Dodd and Cliff Roads, by Chairman Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the request and indicated the staff's recommendation that two duplex lots remain to the west of the existing duplex lots for continuity and flow. Mr. Dave Dehler appeared indicating that Lot 1 was perhaps too small for a twin home. The Commission discussed the Comprehensive Guide which indicated that the property was designated R -II. Hall moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of Lots 5, 6, and 7 with Lots 1 and 2 remaining as duplex lots, pursuant to staff recommendation, and due to the size of Lot 2 and the triple frontage of Lot 1. Mulrooney and Hall voted in favor; Voracek, Wilkins and Harrison voted against. ® Wilkins then moved to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7, Block 2 to R-1 Single Family, Harrison seconded the motion. Harrison, Voracek and Wilkins voted in favor; Hall and Mulrooney voted against. /� 3 i Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company - Mark Baird) for an Advertising Sign --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986, Advisory Planning Commission meeting to consider an application that was submitted by Indy Outdoor Adver- tising requesting a two- (2) sided pylon sign fronting on I-494 in the Eagandale Office Park. The APC is recommending denial. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pagesthroughl6;g) . Q Also enclosed on page/(9/ is a copy of a lette from Tom Davis representing Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company opposing the.proposed sign. The APC minutes are enclosed on page(s) /D 7i ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit for Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company (Mark Baird') for a two-sided pylon sign fronting on I-49'4 in the Eagandale Office Park. 1• 97 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGN) APPLICANT: INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY LOCATION: LOT 14, BLOCK 1, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: L1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPT (JIM 'STORM) APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Indy Outdoor Advertising requesting a two sided pylon. sign fronting on I-494 in the Eagandale Office Park. This sign would be located on the Vendmark lot. COMMENTS: Lot 14 is 200' wide and 445' deep. The proposed 40' tall, spot lighted sign will be located 6'0' from the eastern property line and 20' south of the,. I-494 R.O.,W. If this sign were approved, no other pylon signs on Lots 1, 12, 13, 15 and. the unp'lat'ted 6.47 acre outlot to the east would be permitted due to the lineal 1,000' requirement. The signage area would be 10'6 x 36' per side with a total area of 3'78 S.F. Code allows 250 S.F. (125/side:) and a 40' maximum height for hardship reasons when approved by the City Council. CONDITIONS: 1. Maximum height shall be determined by the City Council and recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2;. The applicant shall be subject to the one time sign permit fee of $.2:5'0/S.F, qO I I 2A - TTFU - -� 11 I �• r g :J' 1 J N, = 494 990 s- ..' i �., - • � 1 i _ it yo C)4. oof J. C O. E IVor^r.. Rose[ aa< r�.�X 3 • ne.. -I• .i}n V. S� tau r - -a ® June 24, 1986 The Honorable Chairman and Members, Eagan Planning Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Indy Outdoor Advertising Company Dear Madame Chairman; On your June 24 agenda, you are scheduled to consider conditional use permit for an outdoor advertising sign on property which is surrounded by our Eagandale Industrial Park. Please be advised that we at Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., which own most of the undeveloped land within the Eagandale Industrial Park, are opposed to this proposed sign. We think the unplanned and indiscriminate location of billboard signs along the newly extended I-494 or 35E throughfares of Eagan is poor land use policy. We believe that the city should be encouraging high image, quality developments similar to what we have planned and began to implement along I-494 as opposed to the billboard signs. The ability to attract new businesses, jobs and increased tax base to the community ® mandates that you not squander away your opportunities to create what is emerging as a very appealing "front door" image for your city. Sincerely, Thomas S. Davis Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. TSD:jo 0 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co. for an advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner. Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT is City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request, for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with 'a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to ® the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. dpi 4 U Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight PRELIMINARY PLAT & REVISED SITE PLAN/FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition (Sienna Corporation) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986, APC meeting to consider a revised preliminary plat for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and contains 68 single-family lots which deviates from the R-1 single -district lot size requirement.. The APC is rec-QMmending anDroval of the revised plan and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning- and Engineering Department report,; a copy is enclosed on pages/through 113 for your review. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to pagesthrough /96 . The original 'Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; there- fore, they have no additional recommendations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat and revised site plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition. /Q3 • .• CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT - FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION - RODNEY HARDY LOCATION: PART OF THE SA, SEC 25 & PART OF THE NEQ OF THE SE;, SEC 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-2, LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE of PUBLIC HEARING': JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 18, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted to revise the site plan and preliminary plat of the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acresand will contain 68 single-family lots which deviate from the R-1 Residential Single District lot size requirement. - ZONING & LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R-2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre under the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. This agreement was entered into by the owner of the property and the City in 1977. The Eagan Land Use Guide designates this parcel as R -I, Single Residential District, with a density of 0-3 dwelling units -per acre. Since there is a Planned Development Agreement governing the land, the Development Agreement for Lexington South Planned Development would supersede the density allowed in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: The preliminary plat, Fawn Ridge, was originally presented to the Advisory Planning Commission -and • City Council in late 1983. There was some discussion in regard to lot size and the original plan approved consisted of 93 single-family lots, which deviated from the lot size criteria, 44 twinhome lots, 88 dwelling units for a total of 181 dwelling units. The applicants ,phased this development into two phases of which the first phase has been constructed and built. The applicants are now looking at the second phase for development. In the second phase, there are 37 duplex lots and approximately 23 smaller single-family lots for a total of 97 dwelling units to be constructed. Since 1983, the applicants have changed their development concept and would like to develop the entire tract of Fawn Ridge into single lots. The revised plat carries the same circulation FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 pattern, which was approved in 1983, and deviated some of the • lot lines to correspond with their new development plan. The net reduction in the second phase of development would be 29 dwelling units. This revised preliminary plat and site plan will now carry the connotation of all single-family lots in the Fawn Ridge Addition. The lot sizes in the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition will exceed the lot size criteria in width and area. Most of the lots in the second addition have a lot width of 75' with a few lots dropping to a width of 70' at the 30' setback line. Therefore, the lots in the second addition exceed lot sizes in the first addition in both area and width. In review of this revised preliminary plat and revised site plan for the Lexington Place Planned Development, the question should be whether this is a better use of the land than what was originally approved in the Fawn Ridge preliminary plat. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: Staff has reviewed the preliminary grading plans submitted by this applicant and found it to be feasible. However, staff does have a few recommendations which the applicant should incorporate into his final grading plan. Staff recommends the applicant provide overland emergency drainage ways at all low points in the roadway. This can be • accomplished by grading a slight swale down the property lines in the area of the roadway low points. Although the applicant proposes to fill a portion of Pond LP -33, the amount is not significant and will not adversly affect the total amount of storage volume available for Pond LP -33. The net reduction. in high water area amounts to about one-tenth of an acre. This equates to a reduction of about 3.0% of the high water ponding area. In staff's opinion, this is not significant. Besides, the available storage volume for this pond is about 12 acre feet compared with the required storage volume of 8.5 acre feet. This proposed development lies within Major Drainage District L as shown on Figure 1. Based on the applicant's grading plan, - staff estimates about 75% of the drainage flows into Pond LP -33. The remaining drainage flows into Pond LP -65. LP -33 presently has an outlet to Pond LP -61. This pond is experiencing high water problems because it has no positive gravity outlet. However, Council authorized a project on June 17, 1986, providing an outlet to this pond and several other downstream ponds under Project 444R that will eliminate the high water problems. This project is scheduled for completion late this fall. UTILITIES: Staff reviewed the utility layout for this • development with the original Fawn Ridge preliminary plat application in 1983. The minor changes and revisions that the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition proposes from the original Fawn Ridge /D5 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 preliminary plat do not result in any changes in the utility layout for this development. It is feasible to'provide sanitary sewer and wa-ter service to this lot by extending the existing utilities from the Fawn Ridge 1st Addition. Staff does recommend, however, that the applicant extend the water main from north Hay Lake Road to Cliff Road. This will allow for future connection to the City's 20" trunk water main along the north side of Cliff Road when it is installed. STREETS: Dodd Road borders this development along the east and Cliff Road borders this development along the south. Dodd Road is de,sig-nested as a City collector street. It is not currently built to its full 9 -ton 44' wide collector street status. Cliff Road is presently a two lane rural highway under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Staff discussed the accesses onto Dodd Road and Cliff Road in the original engi-neer.ing report in 1983. Staff ha's no concerns regarding these accesses. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall be required to dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Dodd Road and a 65' half right-of-way for Cliff Road. ® The developer shall dedicate all easements required by Code. Also, the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over all public utilities not located within public right-of-way. Lastly, the developer shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 10 AS'SESS'MENTS: The trunk area related assessments for this development have been levied. However, the future extension of the 20" trunk water line along Cliff Road will generate a lateral benefit to this proposed development. Staff recommends having this development assume the lateral benefit at this time rather than waiting until the 20" trunk water main is constructed and this development is built. In accordance with City policy regarding lateral benefit from trunk water main, staff proposes that this development is responsible for one-half its net frontage adjacent Cliff Road or approximately 620'. The 1986 rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main is $11.88 making the total estimated obligation of this development about $7,360. The final amounts will be determined by the final plat distances and the rates in effect at the time of final platting. A,11 other costs resulting from the installation of internal public streets and utilities for this development will be the sole responsibility of this development. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24,, 198'6 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hap Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40' half right-of-way and a 65' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Road., respectively. 4. This development shall, dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20" utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPGA, MWCC, Minnesota Departmeant of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal S. public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated 5-14-86: 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road,.. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. /01 • 0 m 2 -1 (YNY CO /\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION IPOND HILL /" •�T i ' 2ND ADDITION I / "\i.\\ FAWN RIDGE T Am .= I --L I '� .n•O', OVERHILI. FARM IOND NDID i \ •'• ` ADDITION F IT AA m- '3tJ ' D A IT A It y----- __ CLIFF Rr)An I...u..O..am, IY...' +o unow. CNGINEEAING "" "•' COMPANY, INC. I u . • i... 11.111 .unnal..n.E..,. 11111 n... ,.m LOCATION MAP GENERAL INFORMATION ID TOTAL ..A., =I " ...IT. ., . • ' ...[. T 31ZE ... IT. .e+un: Lo. u..Tu.c.E Ave....LOT TI.I. V .... ... I,. ALL OW ..aO.. ARE P.Iuui.A.T AND ARE .uu.CT TO Owu.e ON n+A. nAv FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES . 13 + CLIFF LP -33 D DATA a 0 _ YPOND DATA --- - - ---- ---- -- -= - -- _-- ---------_--= PRELIMINARY ROAD ' RoeE G °"'""'"°'"°"""' GRADING DRAINAGE AND nxxxw .v ux° mrvaan < FAWN RIDGE ENGINEERIN"' EROSION CONTROL PLAN •" • ASSOCIATES COMPRNY, INC. U) • IB Ra LRiCK 20" EAGAN19.1 /,`� PARK 31. C'll 10/82.0 1020 ` _ 12` 8 0/' 5 � 1 355 /50.0 23R 237 I 1 I a6.0/ 9 .0 PARK city of eagan � PUBLIC WORKS nFPARTRAC n I 1 EL6 �rrtd�l '1. 1 /7i DAKOTA court TY 1? R K CEP cn NGr mci.uatu 14 P�HxI �� 475/63.0 50 ruGo01 lass:III ) 93.7/1004 ' �tS.lUllr� 1'71 OVERHE e 1 - - v Lr D53.1/68D 503/670 112 112,• j 6 2" 12 0 � 11] 53.7/720' ' l`—_—� -I ----= 60.9/7R0 192h 2 3) ` /24 514/65.0 9/290 180 �1. 116 '. O 6617/ 850 V 6UG GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.RAI. BOOSTER H,w. t. 1059 �1 \ �12° �I 183 _ _I X2.2 /SB.O 68.0/ o \ '1 20` 12.0' 20'4 "- _ 20• 1020 1R7 390,/`9 (1 -IR4 68.]/)9.0 � IRS .: 852/950 IBB I4 OOIE 1895/95.0 .12• 20" - u"W ....... L-�9A , 200 I I eF2 IEP. I _ 70,8/76, Cr I $$IJJPyy��TC' I6• /58 201 Ull_I 1020 26 I ���`)))�///1�II 25,_ 0 Il 02 203 aid/SB.O I \9 I 476/630 --1 010,\\ 195 190 plc >i nems _„ ? 12` 197 _ '1f R•, -• 746/870 . n I 1 EL6 �rrtd�l '1. 1 /7i DAKOTA court TY 1? R K CEP cn NGr mci.uatu 14 P�HxI �� 475/63.0 50 ruGo01 lass:III ) 93.7/1004 ' �tS.lUllr� 1'71 OVERHE e 1 - - SUBJECT PARCEL in WATER MASTER PLAN 1 R23W FIG. #3 approved: -I standarM plate #: 112 112,• a 93IGI' 0 ILIEIVH1IC __ w-7 , 12M' �9� I MAROTZ'E- —� -I ----= 60.9/7R0 192h - SUBJECT PARCEL in WATER MASTER PLAN 1 R23W FIG. #3 approved: -I standarM plate #: 49 `- 70 •0 8.7 83GJ 1� 8306 PdFICn Page • I Irp.:o� LP 4 It 4II `A M1r.1n n1u_ P_ 1 000.e J_o � tltlJ.9 N e1L 5.-17 / J81523%/JP-23 -.- --`-- 890.0/ee \ ". 852.2 3 ' `'��������jjjjlllll \'a., 2 / 8519 a4--- � �`T9• r '. JP -391-"' J,J-r /� /i. JP -25 6890I • JP -53 ��(1 JP- 2 817.0 I ��..-. 189, AO 8604 \ 8400 'rN �' 824.0 I Vol JP -29 926,0•�I L S -IS 945.0 �� JP -27 _ IJP -26 9040 1806.0 -i- 824.0 _ IIJ I O. -51 t ' city of eagan PUBLIC $ � WORKS DEPARTME ................ ................ ............ .... ............ .... SUBJECT PARCEL n 9 STORM SEWER - //v MASTER PLAN FIG. -*1 approved: standard - plate #: 91 LP -47 90080 8,,, LP -30 9 29/06 O9 Q A9060 ° 9/50 915 LP -26 J;I 910.7 9/50 'q .A / 92207 925.4 ' 'I I Luc FIG. -*1 approved: standard - plate #: ,�--� LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'voNn NILS 2ND ADOMOY I FAWN RIDGE �y-I —J 1 L Iz \ \ /10 �`'--- 1 •� /� r"OII • .w- `—_It OVERH:I.I. FARM POND ROAD I `� ✓' ` �� ADDITION \ � 11 ~1 I � �� '• - w./ Al < ER' � /�\ .�/ LOCATION MAP o GENERAL INFORMATION e.uTnG Eon I'D. TOTAL SINGLE Fuov LOIS: ED 1 J o•ou AN N 11.11 LUES LARGEST LOT SIZE ...... EG.... 1 E �1GA. SO I. SMALLEST LOT LITE: 1.11110. IT. DENSITY: E.O1 ONIT.IACRE AVERAGE LOT EIEE: I..... SO- EE. ALL Ory .N•IGN1 ARE IRELMMNUY AND ARE mu1CT TO CAYIGE ON FINAL nm` Lo TIO vo `- %..INA' ------ _CLIFF RbAD---- W J 061w mNN... m4 mlrnoll ....« ..'........... IGINEEHING "'I"" "" I. I. COMPANY• INC. COD ..L. .. A. ....... EPNTml1-.1-1... 11111 wl ... 1000 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ANIAND TOM, FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATE, ll 3 -ham _ n• _' .. 91T � APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co. for an ,advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a ® continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT S REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to ® recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. /Y�/ 4 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Roads, respectively_.. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets • and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING b COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to ® commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary plat on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, 5 U • Agenda Information July 15, 1986, City Page Twenty -Nine Memo Council Meeting COMPRI HOTEL G.' Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant and Rezoning from GB & LI to Commercial Planned Development and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment --A public hearing was 'held at the June 24, 1986, APC meeting to consider three (.3) applications submitted by the Opus Corporation for a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a 6 story, "Compri Hotel.." The City staff initiated a comprehensive guide plan amendment as a part of the application process for considering this application. The APC did recommend approval of the four applications as presented. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report, refer to pages 1/through �2 For a copy of the action that was taken by the A,PC, refer to those minutes found on pages 17,E through /30 . The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the 1986 rate for the commercial and industrial park land dedication fee and a trailway.on Pilot Knob Road. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: rezoning from GB & LI to commercial comprehensive guide plan amendment, 3) and 4.) a conditional use permit. 116 To approve or deny 1) the planned development, 2) preliminary plat approval, CITY OF EAGAN • SUBJECT: REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION - COMPRI HOTEL LOCATION: LOTS 1,2,3, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE IND. PARR #1 AND OUTLOT A EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS), LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 24 JUNE, 1986 DATE OF, REPORT: 13 JUNE, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND APPLICATIONS: Three separate applications have been submitted by Opus Corporation requesting a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a six story "Compri Hotel". The plat will consist of 2 lots with the second lot a proposed restaurant facility. This 7 acre site will require rezoning from GB (General Business) and L-1 (Light Industrial) to a commercial planned development on lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 in the Eagandale Industrial Park No. 1 and Outlot A in the Eagandale Office Park. The site abuts Pilot Knob Road to the west, Corporate Center Drive on the south and the new 5 story Sperry Corp. Building to the northeast. This Rezoning and Preliminary Plat will require a comprehensive guide plan amendment. COMPRI HOTEL: The proposed 6 story (70' tall) 190 room hotel will be the first hotel along the 494 corridor in Eagan. Compri Hotels contain only first class guest rooms and amenities are limited. No large scale meeting rooms are proposed and restaurant facilities will be provided for guests only. Since the building is over 3 stories, a Conditional Use Permit will be required. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will also require the hotel to have an interior noise level of 50 decibels or less. An application for a restaurant liquor license will be submitted to the City in the near future. The architectural styling of the hotel will attempt to blend with the Sperry Building that is nearing completion. The brick and •glass exterior will be accented by the tinted glass stair tower and canopied entries'. The brick trash enclosure on the western side of the building will be accessed by a service drive and .employee parking area. Additional plant material along with the existing oaks will screen this portion of the site. //7 COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 2 Access to the hotel will be from a lines up with Corporate Center Drive in front of the hotel to a canopied the building. PARKING AND STORAGE separated entry drive that This entry drive will loop entrance on the east side of City Code requires one (1') parking stall per dwelling room and one (.1) additional space for each eight (8) units. This would' require ,214 stalls for the hotel alone. Due to the proximity of the airport and that the restaurant facilities within the hotel are private, fewer parking stalls are being proposed. 110 10' X 20' stalls ('9' X 20' employee) are shown on the site plan. No pylon signs are proposed. The main signage will be building mounted on the stair towers. Code requires: 1) That no more than one (1) business sign for each major street frontage shall be permitted on a building for each business located within such building. 2) All business signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design. 3') No signs or combination of signs mountedupon a building shall cover in excess of ,208 of the gross area of s,ide. 4) The signage shall not project more than 10" from the vertical surface of the building. LANDSCAPING': A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and special care will be used to save as many of the existing oaks as the site plan allows. Additional plant material along Corporate Center Drive similar to that in the Eagandale Office Park (Pilot Knob Road and Avalon Ave). All 3:1 slopes and the twin 6' retaining wall areas will need careful landscape plant material selection. The 2:1 slopes will require "ground covers" to stabilize the slopes and to provide for little or no maintenance. LOT 2: This proposed restaurant facility isnot scheduled for construction until the hotel is near completion/or completed. Although the lot will be platted, Opus Corporation will submit site plans to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval prior to the Issuance of the 'building permit. The Code requires one (1) parking stall for each three (3) seats based on the capacity of the restaurant. 79 10' x 20' stalls are proposed thus enabling an approx. 240 seat Class 1 (sit down) restaurant to be built on this lot. The restaurant will have a separate vehicular entry of its own and can share the access to the hotel if so needed. Ile • • COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 3 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading proposed on the preliminary grading plan is feasible. It will require two 6 ft. high terraced retaining walls northeasterly of the proposed hotel building. These are required due to the large natural ravine running down the easterly property line of this proposed development. These retaining walls will allow the developer to grade to 3:1 slopes. The 3:1 slopes appear to be the steepest slopes proposed over this development. These slopes are the minimum allowed for maintenance. The natural topography slopes to the north and the proposed grading plan does not change any of that. This development lies within the center of Major Drainage District H, as shown on Figure 1. The developer is proposing some internal storm sewer to collect runoff from the parking lots and directed into a City trunk line located along this development's easterly property line. This line flows into the City's trunk line located adjacent I-494, which eventually ends up into the Minnesota River Valley. The 54" trunk line connects with a 27" trunk line from Pilot Knob Road at Pond HP -3 as shown on Figure 1. However, recent study of the Eagandale Center. Industrial Park area indicates that the capacity of the 54" pipe cannot be exceeded due to flow restrictions upstream. Therefore, Pond -HP -3 does not appear to be necessary. The applicant's engineer is preparing 'a revision to the Master Plan for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area to handle the storm water runoff by adding additional upstream ponding areas. As a result, staff has no concerns with the encroachment into the ponding area HP -3 as shown on the grading plan. This project will not require any trunk storm sewer improvements on behalf of the City. UTILITIES: According to City record plans„ sanitary sewer and water services were ,extended to Lots 2 and 3 of the Eagandale Center Industr-ial Park. The water service was a 2" diameter line and the sanitary sewer service was a 6"diameter line. Both appear to be at elevations that will suit the proposed building sites. In lieu of this, staff questions the necessity for the separate sanitary sewer line proposed by the developer. Because this line connects to an MWCC collector, the developer will have to obtain the necessary per to connect into this line. Also, because this proposed sanitary sewer connects two lots, it would have to be turned over to the City with an easement dedicated over the line. Staff recommends using the existing sanitary sewer services if possible. The disadvantages of the proposed sanitary sewer line include: 1. MWCC connection permit required. 2. Access for maintenance more difficult than the existing sewer within Corporate Center Drive. This development will not require any extension of any City trunk water or sanitary sewer lines. COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 4 STREETS: Corporate Center Drive and Pilot Knob Road abut the southerly and westerly portions of this proposed development. • Pilot Knob Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County with controlled access. Corporate Center Drive is a collector street for the Industrial Park. Neither roadway will require any upgrading as a result of this development with the exception of possible signalization when traffic warrants it. It is presently being discussed as a part of the County Highway 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. The applicant's grading plan shows the primary driveway to this development lining up with Corporate Center Curve which is necessitated by the potential high traffic volume associated with this proposed development. Staff estimates the hotel would generate about 2,000 trips per day based upon full occupancy. The miniumum throat widths for each driveway access shall be 30'. The separation between driveways is 200' which is the minimum separation staff would recommend on a collector street such as Corporate Center Drive. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development will not be responsible for dedicating any additional street right-of-way because the City has already obtained the necessary right-of-way through previous platting. - This development shall dedicate a 20' utility easement adjacent the Corporate Center Drive property line. The remaining easements shall be dedicated in accordance with City Code. Staff • recommends the developer dedicate a 10' utility easement lying southwesterly of the easterly property line. The existing easement is too narrow to reasonably perform any repairs to the sewer line which may be necessary. If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over the portion of sanitary sewer line designated as a City line. PERMITS: If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer will be responsible for the following permits: 1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC connection permit. All trunk area assessments have been levied. • / -;,-o COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 5 CON^ITIONS ® 1) All standard platting, rezoning procedures be adhered to. 2) This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. L� 3) All signage code requirements be adhered to. 4) The trash area,, perimeter park-ing be screened from public streets. 5') A detailed landscape plan be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plant materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the installation. 6) The total number of parking stalls be approved as the site plan demonstrates. 7) A separate liquor license be issued for the hotel's restaurant. 81) Lot 2 be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9) The plat be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10) The main access drive to this site line up with Corporate Center Curve 11) The two accesses into this development be separated by a minimum of 200' and be a minimum of 30'' wide. 12) A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent the Corporate Center Drive right-of-way. 13') A 10'utility easement be dedicated adjacent the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14') This development will be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. %-kl 0 0 n U ��Y moaned Fir 1 ( SEUyD 27 4v>y ]s qs 1 ;r` 2 3. � ]. I EAGANDUE BJSINE55 U.MPUS 6 T .• NEW ICJl1AND DNrsIaN DF SPERRY MND YrEvf M ue I� AMERICA! 10 PRPRUR E pDUCE U 1S SI ^� 26 S D Pj 1 '1 MINNESOTA H*HWAY RAN SV6 oTO CNANGE. I i ea '! LE K. 55 1T17 IS . ,E */(� VILLAUME- LEA TON Bo%A y - If 51ANDARD LUMBER p1.10T. L'ARSON WAREN WSE '. •'.: �'L' F =�P PIRIE SCOTT ROADWAY EXPRESS - 12; �Z ICJN 7 _Lx`. ST 651 ]2 22 ECONOMICS 1, E - - - UBORATORY �. _l•� nnmeR 1 ••• - : 1 � 9 28 11 L u a 24 s� ]M COMPANY r ..rr CORPORATE THE DONALDSON L . I^... SQUARE COMPANY U.S. POSTAL SERYIOE - BULK MAIL I CENTER v KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS I6 wme NmEb/p. K p. Uo+wM t 4mRn 23 x3. r.m �M..m snea a E..{vmuvTwV x. A'r+x' k.I. foT.q n wux �r sem.. •� w-•w..E xx GV..uL SY.r. EP9+l K. LEMv V+E usAl fNx6 �fe LEMAN LAKE r/I A.,C MINNESOTA H*HWAY RAN SV6 oTO CNANGE. I i ea '! LE K. 55 1T17 IS . ,E */(� VILLAUME- LEA TON Bo%A y - If 51ANDARD LUMBER p1.10T. L'ARSON WAREN WSE '. •'.: �'L' F =�P PIRIE SCOTT ROADWAY EXPRESS - 12; �Z ICJN 7 _Lx`. ST 651 ]2 22 ECONOMICS 1, E - - - UBORATORY �. _l•� nnmeR 1 ••• - : 1 � 9 28 11 L u a 24 s� ]M COMPANY r ..rr CORPORATE THE DONALDSON L . I^... SQUARE COMPANY U.S. POSTAL SERYIOE - BULK MAIL I CENTER v KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS I6 wme NmEb/p. K p. Uo+wM t 4mRn 23 x3. r.m �M..m snea a E..{vmuvTwV x. A'r+x' k.I. foT.q n wux �r sem.. •� w-•w..E xx GV..uL SY.r. EP9+l K. EAGANDALE CENTER N SCALE 1"-6W' FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION 0 6 n 14 1 BUILDING BUILDIG LEMER RE 25• 16 E Y VEA DRUG LRLN) xl- x.. EAGANDALE CENTER N SCALE 1"-6W' FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION • • i CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE — - - Plant Legend I SHADE TREES - 2 1/2' eel. BB SIG 7UTVYN PURPLE ASH, DREENe PIKE LINDEN, .N[v PPREFTY L1HCy MARSHALL'S ASN, SUGAR MAPLE ' yyt• p�. r / j j 7 I '' � - O FLOWERING TREES - 1 1/2' cel. BB CRABAPPLE, JAPANESE TREE LILAC, 1 �/ �!A _ y,♦ SEP VIC ESERRI, 1YVR MAPLE i' f� • - �- /. / �. f4 _ � �,,,y` CONIFER TREES - 6111. BB 1 `� / / 1, . L•� , COLORADO SPRUCE, AUSTRIAN PINE ? 1 % I �" i /� i LI ♦ EVERGREEN SHRUBS - 24' dia. cont. JUNIPER, YEW �. j�. i/ / � �c� n��' �y,;f.,,♦ / LAWN &.I' .�14 EXISTING TREES '1 'f r r ! 6 ox /�t s ✓moi L ` w\ORANT� CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE 14.0/ F- MENDOTA HTS -2. FP -14 8 8 //)H -b AjAl DALE! 285 3 —T rw? 443.5 II 0 Fw, Go H -C ..ILO 54 FP - 632. 8 H -k' Pin 3 4 9., IF 47� WT r"ll K 7 -9 F -d IN, I �7 HP; 7 /DP -12 0 D7b :894 56' L T I Umkj 1', 8 1 �j 0.11: E cr DPml 68 r, UINCEn 659.3 7 J I'�-h `)STRIAL P" R K NO le" I 1 866.0 'T , ;/, -q r ; i -, , I E -s I E, E-fLONE 0 DP 15 k — , — - —­[_, �� 4" 30.24 tl , 876. 24 -9 A 12 878, -C D c D d 0/0"' IN, DP61,7 %rALE Pm2, E-. 8D 2: 0 74. 72 .80 p 87, IF eq. .7 DP -19 i J� I.//:C j '89"Hos c OP -3 E CP 4 OP 14'. 860 0 871 7 L 0 827 7 875,0 .50 87,8.0 DP -13 DP 27 884, 874.6 -61 1\1, 8781 0 ()p DP -1 I '57 3 8560 CP35 t I , . -- I , 5 "' 682842. WIN L.S.-4 RX 3 C p C 8 7 0 8 4 850 866.5 1 864.4 �gt 875. FO[ CP O� i -5 /Q J.E PG 3 7 2. 855 877.2 79�10 OP -26 DP - 4 --t8 / / �q 874,88 L.S.-7 a 74 /8 8 9 1� ! CP -2 7 . 8.1 — D-, - 823.5 ji DP- O� Ir Y RP /�4 : I 30- 7 L F City of leag OPUBLIC WORKS DEPART SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. +1 stand approve . t. ard- �6-1 �ppsllate # : ° _ _..... _.. . ° . a --- -- - . I i °a r a °u m IL 0 •�wrF �� .. u✓hn ' { r pIar�r�.e • ' 1 li W fV r .�. W •� w .AI � • •I � 31 � bl `1 1 I•w w rr fwfw• Pr ' F ' I Driveway relocated to line up-with Corporate Center Dr _ ��� APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Roads, respectively_.. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets ® and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING 6 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to ® commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary 'plat on Lots 1, 2, and;3;, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, %Z� 5 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, and southeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive. It was pointed out by Chairman Harrison that the request actually was for four separate applications. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that proof of parking had been agreed upon. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus Corporation in addition to Tom Gaffney of Prism Hotels. An- historical _presentation was provided in addition to a description of the proposed Compri Hotel. It was indicated that the proposed six -story hotel would actually be 20 feet lower than the existing Sperry building. The builder's architect was present to describe the plan, including berms and _sound abatement methods. Member Mulrooney indicated that the project and application should be considered as a whole in consideration of its b6ing in the nature of a planned development. Mulrooney then moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, conditional use permit, rezoning, and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the following conditions where applicable to each of the requests: 1. All standard platting and rezoning procedures shall be adhered to. 2. This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. 3. All signage code requirements shall be adhered to. ® 4. The trash area, perimeter parking shall be screened from public streets. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plan materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the. installation. 6. The total number of parking stalls shall be approved as the site plan demonstrates. 7. A separate liquor license shall be issued for the hotel's restaurant. B. Lot 2 shall be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10. The main access drive to this site shall line up with Corporate Center Curve. 11. The two accesses into this development shall be separated by a minimum of 200 feet and be a minimum of 30 feet wide. is 12.' A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the Corporate Centre Drive right-of-way. 0 C` J C APC Minutes June 24, 1986 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning, to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. /Y1 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING FOR CHATTERTON PONDS H. Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19.6 Acres and Rezoning from A to R -1--A public hearing was held at the last regular meeting of the APC to consider two (2) applications submitted by Robert Engstrom for a rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat entitled Chatterton Ponds. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the Plan- ning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages 37Y through /f!0 For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page (s) _iV1 -JA47i. The recommendations of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission are enclosed on page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. • • • I-1 LJ 11 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT "CHATTERTON PONDS" APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM LOCATION: SW 4, SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: A. AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 10, 1986 PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted re- questing a rezoning from an Agricultural to R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for "Chatterton Ponds". This development consists of 27 new lots and an existing home site on 19.06 acres located immediately south of St. John Neumann Church. ZONING & LAND USE: The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site R-1 (single family). Five zoning districts abutt this parcel: Public Facilities (church) to the north, Agricultural west of Pilot Knob Road and to the northeast, Parks to the east, R-3 Townhouse (the "Pines") to the south and R-1 (Hilltop Estates) to the south. The existing home site, the Chatterton residence, is situated on a knoll where one side falls towards Mooney Lake. This portion of the site is a grassy openland spotted with mature oak. The Chattertons have cows in this area also. Dense understory vegeta- tion, mature trees and ponding areas cover the rest of the site. Most of these trees are hardwood species and special care should be demonstrated to save as many as possible. A rather steep slope (3:1) to Mooney lake will require erosion control attention to assure that the water quality will not be affected. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 20 lots give this project an overall density of 1.47 units per acre, well within the Code requirement of 0 - 3 units/acre. All lots exceed the 12,000 S.F. minimum and range in size from 16,500 S.F. to 42,370 S.F. Variances will be required on lots 17, 18, 21, 22, 25 and 26 to allow less than 50' of frontage at the curb line as required by Code. This will provide access to home sites in areas where roadways are not feasible. 45v CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING: A single -divided access will serve this development • from Pilot Knob Road near the center of the western property line. The original location was along the southern portion of the pond and was shifted south after a staff recommendation. By doing so, future development west of Pilot Knob Road could occur with the new streets aligning and without disturbing as much of the wooded area on that side of the road. Proposed Chatterton Road will loop to the east, south of a large ponding area and will then branch off to form two tear drop cul-de-sacs with islands. It is from these cul-de-sacs that the variance to the frontage requirements is necessary. The developer has shown building pad locations for lots 215 and 26 to ensure Code setback requirements are adhered to. This development will have an association for several reasons: 1) to maintain architectural control and unity within the project. 2') to provide maintenance in "common areas" and in the cul-de-sac islands. 3) to have trash removal on a single, scheduled basis. 4.) possibly for snow clearing. COMMENTS: The developer has met with the Parks Department several times to discuss parks issues and dedication requirements_ An existing trail on the south side of Mooney Lake will be connected • by a 30' pathway easement to the easternmost cul-de-sac. This will provide an uninterrupted pedestrian connection, all the way to Patrick Eagan Park once the Mooney Lake elevation is lowered. A similar 30' trail easement from the western cul-de-sac to the undeveloped property to the north will allow pedestrian circulation as well as a potential emergency ingress/egress to the site. A road connection to the north appears unlikely due to the severity of the ,slopes. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This proposed development incorporates the majority of the low lying drainage ba -sins receiving surface water runoff from the property east of Pilot Knob Road between Deerwood Drive and Berry Ridge Road,. This proposed development incorporates several knolls and side slopes surrounding the three internal drainage basins with the maximum elevation differential of approximately 35' occurring in the extreme northeast corner. All drainage runoff generated from this proposed development will be directed to the internal drainage basins (JP -36 and JP -35) which will be interconnected through a combination of surface drainage swales and underground storm sewer pipe. The ultimate • discharge of these drainage basins is into Berry Patch Park and Mooney Lake (JP -7) to the east. With no positive outlet for Mooney Lake currently existing, it has exceeded its proposed future flood elevation and cannot accept anv additional runoff. X33 CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 • However, Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) is proposed to be upgraded during 1987. Part of this upgrading will require the development of these internal drainage basins and the permanent outlet for Mooney Lake towards Patrick Eagan Park to handle the runoff generated from this County road improvement. This storm sewer outlet to handle both Pilot Knob Road and this proposed development will be discussed under Project 473 which will have its public hearing held on July 15, 1986. If this project is approved, downstream storm sewer facilities will be adequate to handle this proposed development. This development will be responsible for all internal storm sewer laterals necessary to handle surface water runoff generated from this development and to intercept the surface water runoff from the Pines development located to the south. The final grading, drainage and utility plan shall show all storm sewer pipes constructed to the edge of existing or controlled water elevations, whichever is lower. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is immediately available adjacent to the south property line near Pilot Knob Road. Internal extensions of a sanitary sewer lateral system will adequately service all proposed lots. However, staff does not concur with the proposed lateral extension along rear lot lines adjacent to the north edge of Pond JP -35 to service Lot 16, 17 and 18 due to limited accessibility for preventative and corrective maintenance, as may be necessary. Each parcel should have its individual sewer service constructed to public right-of-way. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is located along Pilot Knob Road to service this proposed development through an internal lateral extension. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing boundaries and severe topography of property adjacent to all three sides of this proposed development, and the location and configuration of the internal drainage basins, there is no other feasible alternative for development of this property without a variance to the City's maximum cul-de-sac length ordinance (500'). Development boundary and topographic cgnstraints result in the two cul-de- sacs and one bubble being necessary for reasonable development of this property. The staff has no objections to the proposed internal islands of each cul-de-sac subject to their development.. incorporating maintenance free landscaping. Final detailed design should be subject to staff's review and requirements. • Access to Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) will be subject to approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. Its optimal location in relationship to minimizing impact for the McCarthy parcel across the road would result in the entrance being located approximately 300' north of the south boundary line. This 30' shift of the proposed center line will also better comply with the County's intersection spacing gy,idelines. CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 The proposed center island at the entrance from Pilot Knob Road should be eliminated. Also, although the internal streets are proposed to be publicly dedicated, they do not meet current ordinance requirements for width (26-28 vs. 34). These streets should be brought up to City standards if they are to be publicly dedicated. EASEMENTS,/RIGHT-OF-WAY: Sufficient drainage and ponding easements should be dedicated for the internal drainage basins adequate to protect the necessary ponding storage volume requirements and interconnecting storm sewer systems. The configuration of these drainage easements will be determined upon submission of final detailed plans for review .by the Engi•neer.ing Division. If the standard street width requirements are maintained, staff is recommending that the public right-of-way dedication be 60' in lieu of the proposed 50' width. The staff concurs with the proposed 30' pathway easements from the terminal cul-de-sac to Mooney Lake with the.final alignment being approved by City staff. - Suf-ficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road shall be dedicated as required by Dakota County to facilitate the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the final plat for all frontage along Pilot Knob Road on either side of the proposed street access point. All other internal drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by City ordinance and/or final detail plan submittal and reviewed by City staff. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer and water have been previously assessed on all the land proposed to be developed under this subdivision. Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed under Project 473, which will have its public hearing on July 15. However, the proposed assessment under this project does not take into consideration the proposed development into single-family lots. Subsequently, significant credits have been calculated under the "large lot" policy which would be voided under this proposed development. Therefore, as a condition of final plat approval, this development shall agree to assume its trunk area storm sewer assessments based on a single family development. Appropriate credit- will be given for any related assessment that may be approved under Project 473. • /3� CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 5 This development has not paid its related lateral benefit assessments from the existing 27" trunk sanitary sewer along the south and west boundary of this plat or the 12" trunk water main along Pilot Knob Road when they were originally installed. Therefore, this development shall accept these postponed assessment obligations as a condition of final plat approval based on the rates in affect. These amounts are estimated as follows: Storm Sewer To be determined based on final plat area calcula-tions and ponding credits. Sanitary Sewer 5801+300'-150' (corner lot credit) = 730" @'$'14.35/FF = $10,475.50 (Proj. 88II) Water 1/2 (600') @ $11.,88/FF = $ 3,564.00 (Proj. 24A) ® With the restricted access being dedicated to Pilot Knob Road other than the public street access, there will be no assessment associated with the Pilot Knob Road upgrading. Representatives of the Rngineer.ing Division will be available to discuss these concerns infurtherdetail with the Planning Commission or City Council at the appropriate meetings for formal review and approval. TAC/ jj • 104 CHATTERTON PONDS PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac • street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60' in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the. Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accomodate all public utilities,, ponds and tra-i'lways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single—family development. 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. 8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) be removed prior to building permit:.issuance. 11. Park dedication fees & trail issues be resolved prior, to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. C1 /37 0 • • /3e ` (L FiMe MBM pp pBPM q u MUMICMIL t CFMMR s WNDCWST PARK 2 4 BFMBP S� 22 MMR �S �'prV1 M1M/CR_ S .3 S i�Luso. P ` a C c4 4 q FO 3 A. I'l SII^�IIIB 3 ,y, /3e MIwqIIrI, 0 \\.. s )I ,N4 Chv - Y, 4119 q.h. 17. 34,3 k 29,946.2 7.5, h 16. A. 2 ft I IL - - -------- 9. GROSS �QLJARE F OTAGE Site: 830,362.5 sq.ft. = 19.06 Acres Total Lots: 724,410 Number of Low 28 Density 1.47 D.U. per Aae Lin 1. 01 V -23, I I DP 11i '52 829:6 860295 F C P - 12 C P I 826 5 0 9,,3 6 .7' -L-0 Dk-"20? l 871 0 89Z2 8800 J 3 I.JP-67 J�'-j j! , 1171.0 47. jP-2 8800 4763 1 CP- 11 8490 , 95 0 80,, 1 844 0 'j� w. l JP -47 30 JP -15 'I � 049.2. 8440 7T i -I '111 -Ls 11) 48 J -C 24 ut 6 84 P 13 79 t 8 I. Ali, Old ip .23. J 834.0 71.ACKH4.-,K 27' PIAL't- I PAHY P-2NN 1 7S923iJP-1 8 80/.0 0 P-29 t 7 820 6j '0 11 18.0 SKJ 10A t�c i l5 - 1097 8 9 BP -28 0 JP -49 862S Bp-�3 868 818,1 8860, 8300 R- ; k I city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME I) P- 4 N.- C',FIRIAGE LK, 686742: ADI n - r12 Ot F 893,0U BBB/ 895.5 JP 46 993512 3 YP 5 1 12' 63 'J699�7�P' JP 3(2 81JP- l 2 ip-11 900?!'j(ll"1 8�8 - .71 8157 JP 44 z 9& 6300 8907 - J h}- w 40. I 11 -Y J-1 /s-30 873D AD5 94 87 :r I �i 23 /19 6�09 JP -, 9450 8706 873jp-3'5 JP 7 ,? 6694 1,19 SP -3 .4 88724 85 BP - 35905,2 9760 9800 J -,e 908.0 6 j 9 3, N JF -q.- SP -5 BP -4 874,2 875 0 *1 9240%B 1 65 9272882 BP -2 3 B., 8 86.0 855.0 4 lij C2- BSB O L -d v : . 1 B-k- BP 24. 7 �1 —BP -5- -Y- 918 0 8745 8865 LP 44 846 B-4 k�;f 853 .20, o,��,:, :BP 5P- 17 867 1 ;..:t I L - '8920 'P "4 2 -23 .,931.3 1 - 1 5 830. �Jji 0 932. 8219 92 27' ay BitAO - I uL vu EGBP-16 .2' lI ,,00 -1z, ��Lsl 18/9 I. r BP -IS L L.S. 1 Lb 8 BP -111 9 899 L 54 -`..8910 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME I) P- 4 N.- C',FIRIAGE LK, 686742: ADI n - r12 Ot F 893,0U BBB/ 895.5 JP 46 993512 3 YP 5 1 12' 63 'J699�7�P' JP 3(2 81JP- l 2 ip-11 900?!'j(ll"1 8�8 - .71 8157 JP 44 z 9& 6300 8907 - J h}- w 40. I 11 -Y J-1 /s-30 873D AD5 94 87 :r I �i 23 /19 6�09 JP -, 9450 I 99370 1 1 j .9080 l:!:; ................ ............... ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ ................ ............... STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ul— 9 ILP -401 .7, — 1 896.0 LNUT I [,,-. -- V9 6'0 ....... .�LP 37 1.9006 8783 FIG. -*1 approved- standard - plate #: I JP 51 9760 9800 J -,e '1.1 Jp-2a p85-43 53.8 ADD �1956 0 9694 L -d v T I 99370 1 1 j .9080 l:!:; ................ ............... ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ ................ ............... STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ul— 9 ILP -401 .7, — 1 896.0 LNUT I [,,-. -- V9 6'0 ....... .�LP 37 1.9006 8783 FIG. -*1 approved- standard - plate #: I APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in 40 regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to -recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning. to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. ® 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. A(/ APC Minutes June 24, 1986 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. 8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. It was also recommended that the staff ® plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. All voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of McCoombs, Knutson. was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR i FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 11, 1986 RE: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CHATTERTON POND At the Commission meeting on July 10, 1986, the Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. Commission members had made an on-site visit to the site to review and investigate the topography of the area, to determine if the trail connection between the proposed plat, and Berry Ridge Park to the east could be made. After their reviewal and discussion, the Commission made the following recommendations: 1. That a cash dedication requirement be required for all lots. 2. Trailway on Pilot Knob Road be the responsibility of this development. 3. That a five foot bituminous path be developed connecting the easterly ® most cul-de-sac to the east boundary of the plat, connectable to the trailway in Berry Ridge Park. 4. That the developer bench in a trail bed two feet above the normal pond elevation, and provide a trail easement through proposed lot 24 to that portion of Berry Patch Park now inaccessible. Should you have any questions regarding the Commission's recommendations, please feel free to contact me. KV/bls C1 J i y3 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 198,6, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One PRELIMINARY-PLAT/TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE I. Preliminary Plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake Consisting of 60 Townhouse, Units --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by New Horizon Homes for a 60 unit townhouse project located on approximately 14 acres and described as Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights. The APC is recommending. approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages Mo through. For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(s') rl . The original Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; therefore, there are no additional recommendations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny preliminary plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, 'THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE' • APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING OUTLOT C, THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS, NW.1/4,.SEC.,28 R-3 IN THE BLACKHAWK P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 6, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. ZONING AND LAND USE: Outlot C is surrounded by the recently approved Deerfield Apartments to the north, Thomas Lake Heights quads to the east, the Highline Trail to the south and an un- developed R-4 district to the west. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as a mixture of Parks (P) and Mixed Residential (R-2) with a density of 3-6 units/acre. The site has steep slopes and drains primarily into a pond on the southern portion of the site and off-site to the east. SITE PLANNING: Clemson Drive will be continued west for approxi- mately 200 feet and then proceed north forming Beacon Hill Court. All of the quadraminium buildings exceed the 30 foot front yard • setback and have more than the 30 feet between buildings which was required in the Thomas Lake replat in 1983. Clemson Drive continues west to the property line where a temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed until development in the R-4 district occurs. The Williams Brothers Pipeline easement extends 40 feet into this plat along the eastern property line. There are no setback problems. Each quad unit will be served by two private entry drives most of which are 14' wide. Code requires 1 indoor parking space and one outdoor space for each unit. This is provided ,with the parking area in front of each garage. COMMENTS: This development will have an association to control trash pickup and maintain the common areas. The architectural styling/color of the buildings will be the same as that in the Thomas Lake Heights Addition. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and should need little or no revisions. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This development incorporates a section of land with considerable variations in topography and elevation with the maximum differential of approximately 40' in the center of the plat. Approximately the northern two-thirds of this development will direct its surface drainage to the northeast . into the drainage basin within the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition which is ultimately connected through a series of storm sewers to the system within Thomas Lake Road. The lower third of this development will direct its surface water runoff to the /0!� THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE JUNE 24, 1986 PA'G'E 2 ` south into the Highline Trail drainage basin Pond BP -6. This southerly drainage basin currently receives runoff from the Mallard Park and Woodgate Additions and does not have an outlet presently available. A future outlet would be provided through the installation of a storm sewer lift' station and force main discharging into Thomas Lake Road. However, at the present time, this drainage basin is able to handle all current drainage and anticipated future runoff from this lower third portion of the proposed Trails of Thomas Lake Addition without requiring the installation of this outlet. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing topography and property line constraints, it is not feasible to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac to the north. This cul-de-sac will require a variance due to its length exceeding the maximum 500' allowed by City Code. Clemson Drive is proposed to be a continuation from the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition eventually connecting to Johnny,. Cake Ridge Road through the future development of the Wi.lmus property to the west. The center line of Clemson Drive is shown approximately 625' north of the south line to allow its extension to Johnny Cake Ridge Road to conform to the proposed future parkland dedication associated with the development of the Wilmus property. This stub street portion of Clemson Drive will have to have a full right-of-way and cul-de-sac constructed until such time that the adjacent properties develop to allow its continuation. The staff supports.the proposed configuration of the cul-de-sac street and Clemson Drive intersection which will help to provide continuity but yet discourage through -traffic due to the turning movement required. Staff recommends that the name "Beacon Hill Court" be changed to avoid confusion with the Beacon Hill Subdivision located south of Cliff Road. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been stubbed to the east property line of this proposed subdivision to be extended upon a future development such as this. Althought the western boundary represents the major drainage district divide for sanitary sewer, it is recommended that the sanitary sewer lateral be extended to the west property line to provide maximum flexibility for future development of the unplatted property and park land to the west. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is availabe to handle this proposed development with the lateral extension through this property. With the development of the Thomas Lake Heights Addition, a water main stub has been provided in the northeast corner to be picked up by this proposed development through the cul-de-sac for proper looping and fire protection which is not shown on the preliminary utility plans submitted. The water lateral should be stubbed to the west property line to provide for future extension and continuity of the water system. • Other details associated with the installation of sanitary, storm sewer and water main must meet the current City engineering standards at the time of final plan review and .approval as a part of the final plat process. 1�4 THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The drainage and ponding easement of sufficient size and storage volume shall be dedicated over the southern portion of this plat necessary to meet the requirements of the Master Storm Sewer Plan for drainage basin SP -6. The final alignment and configuration of this easement will be defined at the time of final plat approval. All other internal utility line easements will be defined after final engineering review of utility plans and shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. All other public right-of-way dedication meets the City Ordinance and engineering requirements for this type of subdivision. However, additional right-of-way or roadway easement will have to be conveyed to the City to accomodate the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac,at the western end of Clemson Drive. ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed under Projects #88, 237 and 256, respectively. No new additional assessments are required as a condition of final plat approval. However, all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision and its future extension to the west boundary line will be the entire responsibility of this subdivision. 40 Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to discuss any aspect of this report during the review process before the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 0 THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be desig,ned in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadwayeasements• shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de- sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A yard ance must be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul -de -sac - 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul -de -sac -to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated' on the final plat as required by City staff subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. a. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. • 0 • F -IL /q (V f � 'eO HT- 'I e.a1 � wee • Ya j�`'�• © n�iire � �-/ q� vIPA LT ..Ib e.r.a •�p 'qR L y. vena I,�Y4 .r 'F i1v a Cef /q RANT S[.NEDULE 14 DEVELOPMENT SUI.IPV�RV nvur•4T M1�n�u if.. � u.nR Ac rws ee•+-b+rf..-r 1.1 u/n o r w w ._ _.. ...... . _ - iZ�PRElIMINNC! IANDSCAPE/(tNERFL LEVFI'ENT 55OCIWE5. INCOMme 11imM nTHE TRAILS OF TI-=, LAKE _ HORIZON ��- �"'• MCCOMBSKH NOMEJ. ING. tit z pmv , "�'8076 HJ. : 27 r I I L rv•BP- A 4 ' I -7 '. JN 7923 .9006 e�-' 80 BP -2 t 8091 099.7 A -CCC 818.0 tP_ g� AP - 8566., BP -28 8189 i. lntc'� 8300 -33 8 A-� - 61 f I 488668 -b 8663 k B.P. 72 36' A�d - [A - 5.? JP -36 .1 tl � : 26 77, J419N5� 18P59 i 68 A0 jj -,'LI�F�� I Q1. i BP_3 8724 1 965. l-1-11 98 809529 PM ii L: T.'. 13 P - 35 ec 9080 JP -4V ',-7; -0' 8745 74 0 1 AP_ I'Ll 68Z 3 1 j' -4 875 B P BP 25 J 8742 -.8.?06 71 R T - 9240 8,96 5 927. P LP; 6 3 AP 886.01 nB 6 :6 . L. I a I 'ZA 85816 A 8860 A 11 (:2'- L 12 -7 8-k -SP-24 BP_5 AP 5 9 18 0 8145 1 L P /AP 8899043 1 '903 2' 1 886 �5 4 889.2AP-28 9100 ��6p-iti IF 1 9181 892o 11-:- LP -42 8871 AjIr BP -23 Is J1 840.5 BP -16 850.0 ,11 9323 93L3 [- / ";� B -9 AP 12 /Y.b I P -91123 Z' 893.3 BP- 2,7 P P_ '898P A' - P-22' ir"A 43 9040 1 ! _� 8736 9 r-1) k L J 8 6 0 'C"o 9 9 9098 3-9 8 L -, .1 - ". A 9.160 12' 27 -e AP -26 C'6 .I _6� B P - 15 L 0835, S. -3i -- 19K) BF -14 71 LP15 BP 2.6 904 8990 A -CC fit, 9160 904 686L_j I AP -23 , lil, '. , . 1110 : 900.� IS 8893 K BP 13 roll 9050. .921.4 81.7 P-19 92-7.0 Z4 27'BP-B BP_1 ID' - - .9150 8- h. 912 1 AP- II/ 159200 -.90o'53 ;69,6'\ 12 Y182 A., BP -21 Wdklf :L 894 1 � " P-25 9160 AT Fev 6805 BP 7 AP -50 886:5 sj 8860BP 22 13�0 11.4 51 ) I I - - �AP-4� Ct, 894.0 0 - . �r! , � . 9 276.40 ..904 _ 1. -.-- __ I . 8P_12 G. BP -31 9080 A.dd/ r B-. 11 9140 AP -13 . -T� -� , . I IT.� B P I 0( 935 BP -34 08. /V Al 14 1 97' 988,0 912. 1 -1-9. R IGO6. 0 _9'3 2 R:i,r AP -44 YJ f. jo'i[K6 L41 57 g �'z 911.0 r 915.9 L,S.-21 7% , LT 9180 o AP -29 121 GOI. tHa916 0 COUN 92a AP 16 ��,DcAP­48 S -21A LP _,260 "0" f _io- -58 892,0 4 -4 '9051 ��'-AP S� LP AP -15 9 3 4 C,)�00� LP 41'. 907.1 9088 9383 9130' :i K863 1 148 J 30 915.0 9 A 9P 9 22 9 9 , '2 2 26. LP_ 9A3 9255 0-0* P-18 ' T grit',7.LP-96 AD- BJECT PARCEL ou ................ ................ ................ ............... 'op FIG. +1 City of eagan approved: standard - PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: WORKS DEPARTMEN7 MASTER PLAN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® j! 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. B. The Pilot Knob Road -access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building - permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final .plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in • the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. 'I[ was also recommended that the staff plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. All voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive.and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of Mc Coombs, Knutson was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to ® allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. 8 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all Qf the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. B. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary, plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A ® (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at • 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. DGK 9 Secretary - APC E Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/PARK FOREST APARTMENTS J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres and Rezoning from A (Agricultural to R-4 (Multiple) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986 APC meeting, to consider a rezoning application from A to R-4 and a preliminary plat for a 420 unit apartment complex as submitted by Earl Jespersen. The APC is recommending denial of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering reports found on pages zf through "On/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(/A 165 .. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash dedication and trailway on Federal Drive. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-4 and the preliminary plat for Park Forest Apartments as presented. /5(/ L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: DESIGN COLLECTIVE (EARL JESPERSEN) PARK FOREST APARTMENTS LOCATION: S.E. 1/4, SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: A (AGRICULTURAL) JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 11, 1986 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by The Design Collective requesting a rezoning of a 32 acre A (Agricultural) parcel to R-4 (Multiple) and a preliminary plat for 420 Apartment units. This site is located west of Federal Drive and 35E in the SE 1/4 of Section 16. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as R-1 (Single Family) and R-2 (.Mixed Residential). Therefore, an amendment • to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be required. ZONING AND LAND USE: This development is surrounded by agri- cultural (A) land to the north„ 35E to the east, Blackhawk Glen (R-1) to the west and the northernmost portion of the Blackhawk Planned Development. This P.D. has both R-3 and R-4 districts bordering the .proposed apartment project. An undeveloped portion of the Blackhawk Hills single family development is to the immediate southwest of the site - The topography is rolling with knolls and depressions. Existing vegetation consisting primarily of elm, cottonwood and popper is scattered, often found in the depressed areas. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 420 units give the project an overall density of 13.13 units/acre. Code requires that the minimum setback shall be increased by 1 foot for each foot of height over 35 feet. The building on the NW is shown approximately 30 feet from the Pacific Avenue R.O.W. where a 50 foot setback along a public street i•s required. Building sections and elevations have not been submitted but staff was told that these buildings would be similar in scale to the Lemay Lake Apartments. Therefore,, this building would need to be moved to the south to meet code compliance. This may also be the case on the northeastern most building, that is 50 feet from the property line. All other setbacks • meet code requirements. The 420 un -its will require 420 indoor parking stalls included with the rent in order to provide the 420 10' x 20' outdoor spaces being proposed. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING/LANDSCAPING: The six dwelling buildings are serviced • by two main divided entries from Federal Drive on the east and south and by a single access from Pacific Avenue on the north. The drives converge to the center of the site (south of the pond) where the 3,00'0 S.F. clubhouse is situated. Amenities located in this area include a spa for '10 people, 2 outdoor raquetball courts and 2 tennis courts. The Parks and Recreation Department will require a trailway along Federal Drive for the entire length of the project along with a cash dedication fee. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted by an out of state architect that will need to be strongly upgraded to meet City standards. On multifamily projects, one tree per unit is the minimum standard. This would allow for performance standards enabling the City to require a more dense screening from roads, parking areas, trash enclosures and especially different adjacent land uses. Building heights and landscape plans submitted on proposed grading plans are necessary to provide adequate buffering. Existing trees should be carefully located in an effort to save as many as possible. The detailed plan required for final plat approval should be done by a landscape architect familiar' with native species.. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the developer • submitted for this development is feasible. The applicant does, however, propose on filling some of Pond JP -2 which is located at the north end of this proposed project as shown on Figure 1. This pond is designated as a future City detention pond in the Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The developer has shown on the preliminary grading plan that he can provide the necessary ponding area by reshaping the pond somewhat. Before the City can approve the final plat for this development, the City must authorize the project to construct the outflow pipe from Pond JP -2. The City installed a portion of this pipe under 35-E during its construction. The portion west of Federal Drive to Pond JP -2 and the portion east of 35-E to Pond JP -3 remain to be constructed. UTILITIES: City Project 432 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer through the middle of this development to provide service to the Royal Oaks Addition immediately north of this proposed development. The sewer is deep enough and of adequate size and capacity to provide service to this development. A 30" trunk water main will be brought to the northwest corner of this proposed development. This water main is being constructed under City Project 451. The contractor will complete this work this summer. 16� PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 • With this development, staff recommends extending this 30" trunk water main to Federal Drive. From there it can easily be put across the freeway because the City had the casing pipe installed with the Interstate construction. This line can then tie into an existing 30" line within Duckwood Drive, west of Pilot Knob Road. Figure 2 shows how the completion of this water main fits with the City's Comprehensive Trunk Water Main Plan. Staff recommends the Council not approve the final plat for this development until the Council authorizes the installation of the 30" trunk water main. Also according to the City's Master Plan, the 8" water line proposed within this development should be brought to the southwest corner of this development to connect to an existing 8" line servicing the Blackhawk Hills Additions. This, along with a 30" line, will complete the City's trunk water system west of 35- E in this area. STREETS: Federal Drive borders this proposed development along the east with Blackhawk Road bordering this development along the south. Pacific Avenue will be brought to the northwest corner of this development with the platting of the Hampton Heights Addition. Both Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road are built to their ultimate design sections. • Staff has no problems with the two access points proposed. Both appear to have adequate sight distance. The developer proposes on extending Pacific Avenue about 500' east. The extension of Pacific Avenue will require a 30' easement from the property to the north. Because this street is proposed to temporarily deadend, the City will require the construction of a temporary turn -around. In the future, this street could connect to Violet Lane. This development is responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk along Federal Drive, its west property line. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The only right-of-way necessary for this development to dedicate is a 30' half right-of-way for Pacific Avenue. MnDOT acquired the right-of-way for Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road with its I -35E right-of-way acquisition. It may be necessary for this development to dedicate an additional 5' of right-of-way for the sidewalk along Federal Drive. At this writing, staff has not been able to determine the right-of-way for Federal Drive becuase it was included with the I -35E right-of-way acquisition. The City will require the dedication of a ponding easement over Pond JP -2 encompassing the 852 high water elevation. The City • will also require a 20' utility easement over the storm sewer outflow line from Pond JP -2 and a 20' utility easement over the 8" and 30" water main. PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 Also, a -s a condition of final plat approval, this development will be required to obtain the necessary street easements for Pacific Avenue and its turn -around from the property to the north. PERMITS: This development will require permits from the Minnesota Department of Health for water main extension. Also, a sanitary sewer extension permit from MPCA will be required. In resea-aching the City's assessment records, staff found that this development is responsible for trunk water area. assessment and upgrading the trunk area storm sewer assessment from single family to multifamily because of the proposed R-4 use. This development will also be responsible for the lateral benefit from trunk Water main assessment resulting from the 3'0" trunk water main construction as shown on Figure 3. The following table. summarizes these assessment obligations of this development. Description Trunk Area Water Trunk Storm Sewer Upgrade Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water (1) Net area total. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd Quantity 27.2 (1) 1,186,140 (1) 618 (2') Multi -family - single family rate. 1986 Rate $1,190/Ac. Amount 0.014/sq.ft. (2) 11.88/f.f. $32,370 All costs for the installation of all internal utilities, except possibly for trunk storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility of this development. 16,600 7,340 PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: • 1.. This development shall provide the amount of storage volume for Pond JP -2 as required by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. 2. Final plat approval cannot occur until Council authorizes the installation of the trunk storm sewer line outlet, the 30" trunk water main, and the 8" trunk water main loop to .Federal Drive, unless the applicant wishes to install any portion of these utilities under private contract. 3. The development shall dedicate a 30" right-of-way for Pacific Avenue and be responsible for obtaining the northerly 30' and turn -around easement for Pacific Avenue. 4. This development shall be responsible for obtaining Minnesota Department of Health, MnDOT and MPCA permits. 5. Staff shall approve any phasing plans. 6. This development shall be responsible for a 5'concrete sidewalk, and a 5' right-of-way if necessary, along Federal Drive to the west edge of this plat. 7. A detailed landscape plan submitted on a grading plan with the final plat submission. A bond shall be submitted and ® not released until one year after the installation. 8. All standard plat conditions be adhered to. C� 1sf • • 11 n.[ oaooiE jj If I11 E !IC/LIIIM Y� _� :f ,P ® CEMR OILPRI PYIP LL�L9 sPRPCE bi iaT_ we og71—r o. I TOY Iddr � f O L u M1 v aRE U<l LIPP�I� 7 L EEORR r �If1[PGIr YUMI[lNL .� ® CENTER n L al/A 3/11731107 -' �1N3W121VdV.•v1 - full .......... M,zo, i-7 r a "I . . . . ............. Zia s P-37. 03.6 o7 6 AP -35 660.6 9660 city of eagan PUBLIC r _ WORKS ................ ............... ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ( ) DP-: 90U 904.1 FIG. +1 approved: standard - plate #: city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN • I 1810 FIG. #3 approved:"a""a1O plate #: ® �p�LIMIIJPRV FLAT - .._ _.. '. Y;u;,,i tr�:�:- h �...o�os .��nva+•ssnn..=s �.c BLACKIJ.AWK APARTMENTS ,_) COOL EG -c .Tu APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • 4. Street name for the ~cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A ® (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea: ® DGK Secretary - APC 9 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three ADDITIONAL ITEMS SOUND LEVEL METER PROGRAM A. League of Minnesota Sound Level Meter Program --On at least two (2) occasions, the City Council has given consideration to the purchase of a noise sound meter. On one occasion there was interest expressed in purchasing a noise meter for the purpose of monitoring airport noise and more recently, there is discussion regarding acquisition of a noise meter for monitoring the Sperry semiconductor facility. The high cost for a noise meter was a reason in both cases as to why a sound meter program was not established. A second reason related to potential liability if the noise meter is used as an en-forcement device. It would be necessary to have an employee properly trained if the results of the noise meter are to be used as reason for enforcing our noise ordinance. The City has an environmental noise ordinance and with the growing number of complaints related to noise compatibility, Administrative Assistant Hohenstein was asked to research available sound meter • programs and also address the liability factor if the noise meter were to be used by City staff in an effort to enforce the noise ordinance. The League of Minnesota Cities has a sound meter program which is available to the City and is explained in the attached memo prepared by Admi istrative Assistant Hohenstein, found on pages A67 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny implemen- tation of the sound meter program through the League of Minnesota Cities. 144 • MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN DATE: JULY 8, 1986 SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES SOUND METER PROGRAM Pursuant to our conversations, I have investigated the availability of sound level analyzing equipment. The purpose of this memo is to outline briefly the information that was gathered and possible alternatives for City action. The incidence of circumstances under which a sound level meter might be used in the City of Eagan are apparently increasing. These circumstances include a number of citizen complaints regarding the enforcement of the City's Environmental Noise Ordinance, complaints about traffic noise, requests for studies of noise compatibility for developments, and the increasing level of aircraft noise. Currently, it is neccesary to request special studies of the. MPCA to enforce or study any of these items. In the past, the City Council has expressed concern that the conduct of noise studies might tend to increase the City's liability to law suit. I have contacted a number of noise • experts including Dave Kelso of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Tom Duffy of the National Organization to Insure Sound Controlled Environment, John Nelson of the City of Bloomington and the Metrosonics Corporation. None are aware of precedent cases which hold a city liable for noise simply because it has conducted studies about its presence or level. In fact, there is a possibility that the new state noise standards may place a liability on cities for allowing land uses which are noise incompatible with those already in place. While the League of Minnesota Cities continues to oppose this rule and lobbying efforts may result in its amendment, the City may be best served if it is able to anticipate noise levels through the use of a meter before approving certain uses. Purchase prices and capacities for such equipment vary widely. A hand held unit from Larson -Davis Laboratories costs roughly $1,300. The Metrosonics sound level analyzer lists for $10,000. Electronic Design Company, Bruel and Kjaer and Quest Electronics all have equipment priced somewhere between. Obviously so great a diversity in equipment and cost implies a need for an expanded level of expertise in the sound analysis business before good decisions can be made on capital expenditures. For this reason, it may be advisable for the City to take part in the Leagueof Minnesota's Sound Meter Program. The League • purchased a number of 3M Model 3220 sound level meters with the intention of making them available to member cities at a nominal fee to conduct sound analysis. To date, response has been low and the League is willing to distribute them to cities on a loan basis without financial obligation except for unnecessary wear and tear. A copy of the custody agreement for such equipment is attached for your review._ The City may have the equipment for up 147 Sound Meter Program ® July 8, 1986 Page 2 to 18 months without charge and may renew the loan agreement at .that time. The PCA also makes available training for City staff who may be assigned to conduct measurements with the equipment. The training is conducted by MPCA staff member Dave Kelso and City of Bloomington staff member John Nelson. It is conducted as a portion of the Minnesota Police Officers Skills 'Training program. Initial training time commitments require only a couple of hours and subsequent training can be modified to fit specific interests. Because the nature of the complaints described above varies widely, it may advisable for representatives of several City Departments including Inspections, Planning, Police and Engineering to undertake the training. The availability of a sound level analyzer and the training in its use will allow the City staff to become familiar with the operation of such equipment and allow for more informed decisions if we were to consider purchase of such equipment in the future. Please inform me if you have any questions concerning this matter. Ad nistrative Assistant Enclosure JDH/jeh • On • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four OtemPUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicols Road) --On February 18, 1986, the public hearing was closed and the project approved for the upgrading of Nicols Road from Kings Road to Beau D Rue Drive under the above referenced contract. Also, the preparation of the detailed plans and specifi- cations were also ordered. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to, the Council for their information, review, approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bid solicitation. The major concern regarding the upgrading of this road, besides the proposed assessments, dealt with the width and location of the trailway. The Council had directed Staff to meet with the property owners once final plans had been prepared and the proposed location of the trailway could be accurately located in the field. Enclosed on page , %Z is a memo regarding the results of that meeting. Also,, it should be noted that Staff designed the road improvement on Nicols Road north of Diffley Road to offset the proposed road improvement as far to the west as possible to minimize the impact of the trailway construction "-- --and to maintain as much boulevard green space as possible.- Also, ossible. Also, because ,of the changeover in :engineering personnel, these plans were not able to be completed until recently. Subsequently, the estimated construction timetable requires that only the southerly half (Kings Road to Cedar Ridge Circle) be initiated this year with the north half (Cedar Ridge Circle to Beau D Rue Drive.) beginning during the spring of 1987. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail these plans at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE 'CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 86-2 (Nicols Road) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Thursday, August 14, 1986. ® MEMO TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: TRAILWAY NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR HICOLS ROAD CITY PROJECT 460, CITY CONTRACT 86-2 On Tuesday afternoon, July 8, 1986, I met with seven out of fourteen of the property owners noticed who are impacted by the proposed trailway along Nicols Road being placed in front of their property. Prior to meeting with them, Bruce staked the east edge of the trailway on each person's property. The general consensus of the meeting was that most property owners were pleased with the trailway location because we were able to keep it away from front yard trees. Therefore, the location of the trailway does not appear to be a problem. As per the trailway width issue, the majority of the residents in attendance requested a five foot sidewalk instead of the eight foot trailway. I would divide the feeling of the residents into three areas regarding the trailway. There were some people who ® were vehemently against an eight foot trail, some people who had no problem with the eight foot trail until the five foot sidewalk substitution was brought up and one person who supported the eight foot trailway. I cited that the eight foot trailway is a standard in the City for two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic and that staff would still be recommending the eight foot trailway but that I would forward their comments to the City Council through you. I don't know how many people will attend the meeting Tuesday 'night. I imagine the ones who most vehemently oppose the eight foot trailway will be in attendance. I told them it would probably be after 10:00 before the Council could get to th.e issue of approving plans for Nicols Road upgrading. I also told them we didn't anticipate beginning construction on their end until next spring. In an unrelated item, the residents were very concerned about the speeds on Nicols Road. I suggested that they write a letter to you requesting that Nicols Road be added to the City's list for further speed study by Mn Dot. I don't know how far the residents will push this issue. I would be happy to discuss this matter in further detail with you if you so desire. Assistant City Engineer 176 RMH/jeh Agenda Information Memo July 15„ 1986, City Council Meeting • Page Thirty -Five PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) --On June 17, the Council approved the final plans for the installation of streets and utilities to Daniel Drive adjacent to the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and authorized the advertise- ment for the bid opening that was held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, July 11. Enclosed on page I_ is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the engi- neer's estimate contained in the feasibility report discussed at the public hearing held on June 17, 1986. All bids will be checked for accuracy on additions and extensions and a final recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the July I'S meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and award the contract to the. lowest responsible bidder. Our File No. 49395 CONTRACTORS 1. Nodland Associates 2. Burschville Construction 3. C.L. Contracting 4. Northdale Construction 5. J.P. Norex 6. Crossings Inc. BID AMOUNT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ FEAS. REPT EST — % UNDER ENG. EST — — % UNDER FEAS. REPT EST. ----- 6335d BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday,'July 11, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $268,527.50 294,183.95 PROJECT 475 $240,277.50 270,000 283,870 —15.4% 302,959.27 306,402.85 328,807.20 331.847.05 PROJECT 468 $28,250 37,000 42,270 -23.6% —33.2% Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 3. Contract 86-11, Award Contract .(,Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) --At the July 1 meeting, the Council received the bids for the installation of sanitary sewer facilities to service the above referenced subdivisions. However, the bids received for the Williams & LaRue sanitary sewer exceeded the estimate contained in the feasibility report by approximately 19%. Subsequently, the Council directed Staff to review these increased cost estimates based on competitive bids with the property owners to see if they still wish to proceed with the project. If the project is reaf-firmed as discussed under the public hearing section of this agenda earlier in the meeting, it would be appropriate for the Council to award the contract to allow construction to begin. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award Contract 86-11 (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) to J. P. Norex, Inc. in the amount of $172,387.20, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all, related contract documents and, if appropriate, ® . authorize the preparation of appropriate change orders to modify /73 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ® FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 11, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE PROPOSED CHARITABLE GAMBLING POLICY City Councilmember Ellison prepared some information regarding a proposed Charitable Gambling Policy for review and discussion by the City Council. A copy of the policy and an Ordinance from the City of Janesville as presented_ by Councilmember Ellison is attached on pages ��`i`— through —. City Councilmember Ellison is planning to address this item immediately following the regular Council agenda as a part of City Council round table. BLUE BELL ICE CREAM Attached for City Council reference is a letter that was sent by the City Administrator to Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. stat}'ng at the specific conditions of operation. The letter is on page � / . BUILDING PERMITS • Attached ona es through is P g 9 Year -To -Date building p rmit informatio . AIRPORT NOISE a copy of the June Attached on pages through _ZBZ is a copy of a letter that was submitted to the City by a resident frustrated with the airport noise. -35E.ACCESS FROM YANKEE DOODLE ROAD City Councilmember Wachter has asked for information regarding an additional access to I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from the City of Eagan and a response from the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the I -35E access. This information is enclosed on pages /95 through I -E6 . SANITARY SEWER BACKUP/ASPEN DRIVE At the last City Council meeting both Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Egan received a letter from Mr. Steven Kaplan,repre- senting Peggy House, for damages she sustained relating to a sanitary sewer backup.. Since the item was addressed at the City Council meeting, a cop -y of our Public works Director's response is enclosed on pages If 7 through AV i7� FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORTS Enclosed on pages �/� through 9LI are copies of the March and April Fire Departmdnt Reports. - 7— MN DEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS/TERESA A PIVAC VS CITY OF EAGAN Attached on pages /9/ through �W Ji is a copy of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights response stating that charges brought before the City of Eagan on hiring practices by Teresa Pivac have been dismissed. The Department of, Human Rights has determined that the complaint of illegal discrimination is without merit. POLICE INFORMATION Enclosed is a copy of various police instances that have occurred from mid-June until early July. Also enclosed is a response regarding the amount of training our child protection officer has received. This information is enclosed without page number. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 175 • • ORDINANCE NO. 206 An Ordinance to Provide for and Regulate The Conduct of Gambling and Related Activities within the City of Janesville, Minnesota • City Council of the City of Janesville, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: Subd. 1. Purpose and Intent. This ordinance is enacted for the following purposes: to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Janesville by closely regulat- ing the conduct of gambling. Subd. 2. The City Council finds that gambling is a nuisance prone activity and as such, is subject to restrictive regula- tion. The Council further finds and declares that the ability to conduct gambling and participate in gambling, is a privilege rather than a right. Subd. 3. Provisions of State Law Adopted. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, relating to the definition of terms, licensing and restric- tions of gambling are adopted and made a part of this Section as if set out in full. Amendments made pursuant to legisla- tion to said Chapter shall also be incorporated and adopted herein without further action. - Subd. 4. Local Approval of State Licensed Organizations. Pursuant to M.S. 349.213, the Charitable Gambling Control Board for the State of Minnesota must notify the City Council before ssuing or renewing an organization icense at the State level for those organizations whose premises are located within the City. if the City Council adopts a resolution disapproving the State license and so informs the Board within 30 days of such notice, the license may not be issued or renewed. Subd. 5. Obligations of State Licensed Organizations. State licensed organiza- tions within the City shall provide to the City Clerk copies of all information which such organization provides to the Charit- able Gambling Control Board. Such copies shall be provided to the City Clerk within seven days after the State licensed organization sends such information to ' the State. Failure of a State Licensed organization to provide such copies shall constitute a basis for disapproval of the license or renewal by the City Council. Subd. 6. Eligibility for License. Eligi- bility for a charitable gambling license within the City of Janesville, shall be restricted to local fraternal, religious, veterans and educational and other non-profit organizations. A local organiz- ation shall be defined as an organization having at least 40 percent of its members who list a Janesville City or Rural Route . `mailing address which would include the existing Janesville zip code, 56048, or its successor as determined by the U.S. Postal Service. __ _ ,/77 Subd. 7. Use of Proceeds of Charitable Gambling. All applications for licenses shall state the proposed use of funds received from the gambling activity. No license will be approved unless verifica- tion on the applicatiomis stated that at least 80 percent of the net proceeds collected from lawful charitable gambling shall be used to support recreational, cultural, and civic programs benefiting the citizens of Janesville. For purposes of this subsection, net proceeds shall be computed as follows: gross receipts from lawful gambling less reasonable sums necessarily and actually expended for the following items: (a) prizes; (b) gambling supplies and equipment which shall be defined as those expenses authorized by the Charitable Gambling Control Board in their adopted rules, specifically Subpart 2 (B) of Adopted Rule 7860.0160; (c) rent; (d) utilities used during gambling occa- sions (e) compensation paid to members for conducting gambling; (f) taxes impos- ed by Minnesota Statute Section 349.212 and; (g) maintenance of devices used in lawful gambling. Subd. 8. Premises. The use of or sale of gambling supplies and equipment de- scribed as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on the premises owned by eligible organizations as defined in Subdivision 6 of this Ordinance. Except for the preceding, the use of the gambling supplies and equipment described in this Subdivision shall be allowed only on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Janesville for the sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor. Subd. 8A. In leased locations authoriz- ed by this subdivision, the sale of pull -tabs, tip boards and the operation of paddle wheels shall take place in a designated area of the leased premises which area shall be separate from the counter, bar or service area. No sale of on or off sale liquor shall be allowed within the leased area. Locations authorized by this subdivision which are owned by the charitable organization need not desig- nate such a location within the premises. Subd. 9. Only those persons who have reached the age at which they are allowed to consume intoxicating liquor by Min- nesota Statutes, shall be allowed to participate in the charitable gambling use of pull labs, paddle wheels and tip boards or shall be employed by the organization. requesting the charitable gambling li- cense for the purpose of accomplishing the sale of the gambling devices describ- ed in this subdivision. Subd. 10. Hours of Operation. The use or sale of gambling supplies and equip- ment described as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on premises owned or leased by those organizations eligible for a charitable gambling license pursuant to Subdivision 6 only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 1 a.m. Subd. 11. The above notwithstanding, the conduct of bingo and sale of raffle tickets shall be allowed on Sundays and legal holidays when not prohibited by, Minnesota Statute 349 and any,amend- ments thereto. Subd. 12. Employees. Compensation to persons who participate in the conduct of lawful gambling, may be paid only to active members of the conducting organ- ization or its auxiliary, or to the spouse or the surviving spouse of an active mem- ber. Subd. 13. The sale of pull -tabs, tip boards, paddle wheels and raffle tickets when accomplished on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Janesville for the sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor shall be accomplished by an active member of the conducting organ- ization or auxiliary or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member of the conducting organization. The pre- ceding notwithstanding, if the person conducting the sale is also the owner or the employee of the establishment where- in space is being rented by the conduct- ing organization, said person may not sell any pull -tabs, raffle tickets, or other charitable gambling supplies while he or she is then on duty with the lessor. Subd. 14. Each organization which is licensed to conduct charitable gambling within the City of Janesville, shall provide the City Administrator with a copy of all financial reports submitted to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board on a quarterly basis if there is any charitable gambling by that organization within the reporting period. Subd. 15. To the extent allowed by Minnesota Statutes, the Council may by resolution set a licensing or permit fee for the conduct of charitable gambling within the City of Janesville. The resolution may set fees for application, processing of any application, including whatever amounts are deemed appropriate to defray the cost of investigation of the proposed applicant by the Council, City Administrator, or Chief of Police and to make a determina- tion of the propriety of granting said license. The City Administrator shall prepare a local application form and shall. include verification that the applicant agrees to abide by the local ordinance concerning the conduct of licensed char- itable gambling. Subd. 16. This Ordinance shall not regulate the conduct of non -licensed gambling as defined by Minnesota Stat- ute Chapter 349 et sec. Subd. 17. Criminal Penalties. Any willful violation of the provisions of this Ordinance constitutes a misdemeanor. Subd. 18. Should any section or subsection of this Ordinance be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,. such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. Subd. 19. Ordinance No. 198 is hereby repealed. Passed by the City Council this 28th day of April, 1986. ®F 31530 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMOUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 MWor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE.WACHTER July 7, 1986 Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Cletk MR GLEN BARON BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC 3218 SNELLING AVE MPLS MN 55406 Re: Approval for Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. to Operate On Public Streets Within the City of Eagan Dear Mr. Baron: In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, Blue Bell Ice 'Cream, Inc., was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public streets throughout the City of Eagan. The action was taken subject to the following conditions: 1) sub- mission of an insurance certificate providing the level of liabil- ities outlined in a letter from Mid -Continent Agencies, Inc., to the City of Eagan dated April 16, 1986; 2) hours of operation Will be noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset; 3) the approval is granted until October 1, 1986; 4) the trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels; 5) caution swing arms will be required on each vehicle; 6) local employment will be used for drivers operating in Eagan. The City Council has directed our Police Department to record any and all complaints that may be received regarding operation of the ice cream truck. It is the City Council's desire to consider an ordinance sometime after October 1 that would address the aforementioned conditions and any other language they might desire if food/beverage vehicles are to be allowed in the future. If you have any questions regarding the action taken by the City Council, feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedge s City Administrator //7,r cc: Jay Berthe, Chief of Police E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk/Director of Finance THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY :1 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT — ER OF PERMITS ISSUED uilding Electrical Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs THIS MONTH 191 JUNE 1986 YEAR-TO-DATE 806 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 1 1 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IYY�. Af'TlTW-W—!, K7 iiy TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 5 FOUNDATION 2 30.00 -30.00 485 SINGLE FAMILY 105 9,207,500 41,257.00 20,612.50 232,569.25 24 DUPLEX 6 390,000 1,956.00 978.00 12,634.00 117 TOWNHOUSE 26 4,228,600 14,971.00 4,513.50 147,573.50 8 CONDO 1 438,000 1,278.00 639.00 14,304.00 1 APT BLDGS 1 5,760,000 14,583.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 0 AGRICULTURAL 11 COMMERCIAL 2 625,000 1,853.50 926.75 9,566.75 26 COMM/IND REMODEL 5 131,372 795.50 375.50 1,237.50 2 COMM/IND ADDITION 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTIONAL 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 13 RES. GARAGES 4 26,180 256.00 -- 272.00 12 RES. ADDITIONS 1 5,184 56.50 -- 59.50 9 SWIM POOL 5 45,900 384.50 156.75 565.75 89 MISCELLANEOUS 32 95,216 1,224.50 -- 1,283.00 0 DEMOLISH 1 HOUSE MOVES 1 -- 15.00 =- 15.00 806 TOTALS 191 20,952,952 78,665.50 35,493.50 636,480.75' YEAR-TO-DATE 806 78,467,602 314,353.50 151,072.20 2,121,317.70 iiy PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE JUNE 1986 MDI.TT-FAMTT.V BRFAKDOWN TYPE 0 OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 6 3 6 390,000 1,956. 193.00 978.00 $ 12,634.00 4-PLEX 12 3 12 683,600 3,624. 340.00 1,812.00 24,790.00 -S-PLEX 5 1 1 5 345,000 1,700- 172.50 850.00 10,645.00 7-PLEX 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM REI 8 -PLS 9- 5 72 3,022,000 9,202. 1,511.00 1,629.00 105,298.00 APT. BLDG 1 1 144 5,760,000 14,583. 1,538.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 12-PLEX 1 1 12 616,000` 1,723. 308.00 861.50 21,144.50 TOTALS 34 14 251 10,816,600 32,788, 4,062.50 13,422.00 390,882.00 1 l'OMMEACTAI./iNDUSTRT Af- A INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN � BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 08 SIB MEM HWY DAKOTA CTY. 12215 L 123, B 1, CEDARVALE OFC REALTORS $ 13,000 $ 98.50 $ 6.,50 $ 49.25 $ 154.25 COMM REI 12217 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM REI L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 1ST COMPANY 12186 3815 NICOLS RD BRAD RAGIN 30,000 193.00 15.00 96.50 304.50 COMM REI L 2 B 25 SECT 19 TIRE CO 12138 4030 PILOT KNOB RD ST JOHN 15,372 116.50 8.00 58.25 182.75 COMM REI N N NEUMAN.CHURCH 1325 EAGANDALE CT OPUS CORP 69,500 343.00 35.00 171.50 549.50 COMM RE 12152 T. 3 R 1, EAG CTR IND PK #7 12153 680 DIFFLEY RD NW BELL TELE 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM NE 4250 LEXINGTON AVE S LEXINGTON CTR 600,000 1,683.00 300.00 841.50 9,298.50 COMM NE 12172 T. I R I- FAC QTR IqT LTD PARTNER PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORliATION DATE: JUNE 1985 I.n 11 T1 -CA Mi1V PPCAV MLM NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT FEE SUR -PUN CHECK TOTAL FEES TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS I VALUATIONS K pH S N �1 n' 'n y w o w 3259 TERMINAL DR SIBM.M IND UK HENNING ROHD A Aqqnr Y T K y 24 6 24 $ 1,475,000 $ 7,615 IS 737.50 $ 3,807.50 $ 48,160.0 6 -UNIT $ 90.00$ 316.50 3,712.50 OFFICE 10442 4155 L 1 OLD SIB HWY B 1, GROUP W ADD TOWNHOUSE $ 325,00C N $ 162.50$ 497.75 4,878.75 OFC BLD 10479 8 -UNIT CORP CTR DR 62P EAG OIC PK 2 OPUS CORP $2,800,OOC 7,183.00 $ 1,140.00$3,591.50 37,795.50 TOWNHOUSE 10368 1285 L 3, CORP CTR DR B 3, EAG OFC PK SPERRY CORP $ 980,OOC 2,633.00 5 490.00'1,316.50 APT. OR 4,439.50 OFC SPA O O O p O O 282 91900,000 25,299 3,650.00 12,649.50 444,294.51 27 9 306 11,375,000 32,914 4,387.50 16,457.00 1 492,454.51 TOTALS I I I V I I p= 0 0 0 N 0 P 0 u 0 N 0 u 0 Y y 9� m: iF m rn ti _ G m V m P 9 p •o P I I I I p I o f m m O N N p m PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORliATION DATE: JUNE 1985 I.n 11 T1 -CA Mi1V PPCAV MLM BUILDING PERMIT 0 NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT FEE SUR -PUN CHECK TOTAL FEES TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS I VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES I CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES 4 -UNIT $ 66.00 PUB FAC 10474 3259 TERMINAL DR SIBM.M IND UK HENNING ROHD A Aqqnr $ 190,000 658.00 TONNHOUSE 24 6 24 $ 1,475,000 $ 7,615 IS 737.50 $ 3,807.50 $ 48,160.0 6 -UNIT $ 90.00$ 316.50 3,712.50 OFFICE 10442 4155 L 1 OLD SIB HWY B 1, GROUP W ADD TOWNHOUSE $ 325,00C 995.50 $ 162.50$ 497.75 4,878.75 OFC BLD 10479 8 -UNIT CORP CTR DR 62P EAG OIC PK 2 OPUS CORP $2,800,OOC 7,183.00 $ 1,140.00$3,591.50 37,795.50 TOWNHOUSE 10368 1285 L 3, CORP CTR DR B 3, EAG OFC PK SPERRY CORP $ 980,OOC 2,633.00 5 490.00'1,316.50 APT. OR 4,439.50 OFC SPA CONDO 3 3 282 91900,000 25,299 3,650.00 12,649.50 444,294.51 27 9 306 11,375,000 32,914 4,387.50 16,457.00 1 492,454.51 TOTALS BUILDING PERMIT 0 ADDRESS 6 LEGAL OWNER VALUATIONS PERMIT FEE SUR- CHARGE PLAN CHECK FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUPANCI 10331 9200 L 1 PILOT KNOB RD B 25 SECT 27 EASTER LUTH $ 6,400$ 62.50 3.50" - $ 66.00 PUB FAC 10474 3259 TERMINAL DR SIBM.M IND UK HENNING ROHD A Aqqnr $ 190,000 658.00 $ 95.00$ 329.00 5 10,717.00 OFC/WHS 10774 1570 CENTURY POINT B 2 CENTURY ADD J R S CONST $ 180,OOC 633.00 $ 90.00$ 316.50 3,712.50 OFFICE 10442 4155 L 1 OLD SIB HWY B 1, GROUP W ADD GROUP W CAB $ 325,00C 995.50 $ 162.50$ 497.75 4,878.75 OFC BLD 10479 1380 L 2 CORP CTR DR 62P EAG OIC PK 2 OPUS CORP $2,800,OOC 7,183.00 $ 1,140.00$3,591.50 37,795.50 OFFICE 10368 1285 L 3, CORP CTR DR B 3, EAG OFC PK SPERRY CORP $ 980,OOC 2,633.00 5 490.00'1,316.50 4,439.50 OFC SPA t 3—Re C u—�J;e�—, ec�nJ — --? L tt Gly cv 0 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 February 18, 1986 MR KERMIT MCCRAE DISTRICT ENGINEER MNDOT DISTRICT 9 3485 HADLEY AVENUE NORTH BOX 9050 OAKDALE MN 55109 Re: I -35E Access From Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) Dear Kermit: BEA BLOMQUIST Mmor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES or, Admmltttmor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gry Clerk At the regular City Council meeting of February 4, 1986, the Council expressed concern regarding the potential traffic conflict associated with the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road wanting to proceed northbound on I -35E. As a result of these concerns, they directed me to contact your office to get a response to the following questions: 1. Why wasn't a direct "diamond interchange" access ramp provided for northbound I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road instead of the existing "loop" in the southeast quadrant? 2. When does the state plan to install the traffic signal on County Road 28 for the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road onto northbound I -35E? Your review and response to these questions will be appreciated and forwarded to the Council for their information. If any additional explanation is necessary to clarify the Council's concerns, please contact me at your convenience. Si erely, Thomas A. f-ic- Director of Public Works TAC/jj THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYM80L OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 4104ESOT91, Minnesota Department of Transportation -+ District 9 • ;`�ti, OF �5Q° 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9050 7RP North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Telephone 779-1178 March 7, 1986 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 2830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Colbert: SUBJECT: C.S. 1982 (I -35E at Co.Rd. 28) q In response to your two questions in your February 2R, 1986 letter, we provide the following: • 1. The traffic projects that the interchange was designed to accommodate showed that the predominant movement was eastbound Yankee Doodle Road to northbound I -35E. Therefore, the loop was provided to eliminate the left turn conflict that would have resulted with a standard diamond interchange ramp design. 2. A Contract to install traffic signals at this intersection has already been let. Construction will begin this spring with the traffic signals in operation in the late summer. We trust this information answers the Council's questions. Sincerely, Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer 40 /A ein Equal Opporrunirr Ernplo3er 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 __I July 9, 1986 MR STEVEN Z KAPLAN "% HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON '1221 NICOLLET MALL SUITE 700 MPLS` MN 55403 - Re: Sanitary Sewer Backup Claim, June 7, 1986 (Yankee Doodle Road) 1542 Aspen Drive Dear Mr. Kaplan: BEA BLOMQUIST My r THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Causal Memb ,, THOMAS HEDGES City Adityo db EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clark Mayor Blomquist and Councilman Egan requested that I respond to your letter of June 23 regarding the damages sustained by Peggy "'House`teTh't'1'figto the sanitary sewer backup of June 7. Your comment of apparent "serious and fundamental design deficiencies in the City's sewer system" cannot be substantiated by our review of the sewer system. While we are aware this is the third occurrence of sewer flooding to her home since 1979, the first two occurrences were directly related to construction activities of which the City had no knowledge or control over specific operations that resulted in damage to our sewer line. . With approximately 160+ miles of sanitary sewer.througiout the City, our maintenance crews have set up a routine inspection, cleaning and maintenance of all lines on a repetitive basis. "`This aggressive maintenance program has greatly minimized the number of sanitary sewer backups per mile of system to a very effective level. However, there is no way that the City can predict or prevent future sanitary sewer backups. I am not aware of any situation where the City has been "wholly unresponsive" to Ms. House's request for implementation of corrective measures. We have discussed -various alternatives with her and informed her of options that she may choose to implement if she wishes to achieve a higher level of protection beyond what any other homeowner is provided by our municipal maintenance operations. 1SL/ THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MR STEVEN ZYKAPLAN JULY 9, 1986 • PAGE 2 It is my understanding that Ms. House has been compensated for past damages by the insurance company representing the contractors responsible for the previous sewer backups. We have also forwarded her most recent claim to the City's insurance agent for investigation and action. In summary, we cannot find any "obviously serious defect" in our .sewer system. We have placed this particular segment of sanitary sewer on a high maintenance schedule and will be televising it in the near future to further verify the integrity of this system. I will be happy to review with you any definitive and positive recommendations you may have regarding our sanitary sewer. collection system. 'FiyvG r.: rI hope that this letter satisfies your request for a prompt response from the City of Eagan regarding this matter. Sincerely, r Director of Pu omas A:yCoIbert; Public Works` •` TAC/JJ cc: Bea Blomquist, Mayor Tom Egan, Councilman Paul Hauge, City Attorney Joe Connolly, Supterintendent of Utilities • M ' 9 1 �.7 • '1� '.' .' UVAU • WORK PERFORMED 5 $ 800 5 ® TypE MAN HOURS 19 8 Fire/Rescue 932 41 $ 800 Training 433 Truck s Equipment Maintenance 163 Station Maintenance 205 Fire Prevention 42 Administrative 499, 2,274 MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 1 1 1 Chiefs 9 4 6 Available Days Available Nights 11 15 9 Available Rotating 2 1 2 On Leave 2 1 0 ® Rookies 0 0 0 =AL 25 22 18 FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other NUMBER $ LOSS 5 $ 800 5 2 19 8 2 41 $ 800 LOCATION OCCUPANCY` $ LOSS Sy rI L • EAGAN VOLUNTECR FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF March 1966 Fire/Rescue 594 Training 493 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 168 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 28 Administrative 291 MANPOWER Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave. Rookies TOTAL Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other LARGE DOLLAR LASSES DATE NAME ,:• 3/16/86 STATION ql 1 9 11 2 2 0 25 4 2 2 4 10 1 23 LOCATION Coachman Apts. /�TQ STATION #2 1 4 15 1 1 0 22 $ LOSS inn 2,500 2,600 re I r STATION A3 1 6 9 2 0 0 18 < �THEgTr. F f : N11lilfesotg _tea - CJ U of Hwwali June 27, 1986 RFF, E14325-MG9-1S Teresa A. Pivac VS C.i Ly of Fagan r,p@gV �g86 Thomas Hedges, Admin Ci-.I:v bf Fagan 3795 Pilot Knoll Road Fagan, MN 5512.2 Dear Thous:; Hedges: Thr. Departrneul: of Human Rights has made an i-rupart: a'1 i-nqui,Iy Irk10 the .issues ra:i. sed :in Lhe bo lle c.apt Toned cha rye, and has reviewed tkre i.ufounaCi:oit pro.vi-ded In conuect:i.on w'i-th Lite charge. Anal.ys:i.s of the .i.nformaL.Ion available in this rnatLer discloses tha;: the compl,a.ini: of :1 Iegai discr].minatl.orr is wit:}tout rrreri.t. Minn. SI:aC. 3 6 3 . 0 6 , Subd. 4(1.), provides for the Comrnissi.oner's dismissal. of charges which are -found to be without merit.. The char ye has been disrni.ssed pursuant Uo this provision. The Department. will take no further action ory this matter. PurstuanL uo Minn. Stat. 363.14, Subd. 1(b)(1), Lhe charging party may bring a civil action against fire respondent in district court; within 45 days of Lhe dismissal of Lhi.s case. If yore have any questions, you may contact the department, a (612) 296-5669. Since ly, Dr.. Linda C. Johnson Gtrmmiss over AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Enclosures 500 Bremer Tower, 7th Place and Minnesota Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612)296-5663 or (600)652-9747 G� 1yG�GfrI iZ%�� Ref: E1025 MEMOP4h1)UN Rased on the information stated below, this case has b:en DISMISSED pursuant to the authority vested in the Conunissioner by Minnesota Statutes 363.06 subd. 4 (1). 1. A review of the qualifications, experience, and education of - the applicants hired for the positions in question indicates that these factors, ;rid not an illegal consideration. of sex, were the criteria used by respondent to select the successful candidates, since all persons hired possessed higher qualifications for the position than did charging party. It is not. the intent of'Lhe Minnesota tiuman Rights Act to prevent an employer from using any nondiscriminatory criteria it desires in making personnel der_isinns. 2. Charging party stated that she had speculated that respondent might screen applications subjectively because she has reason to believe a neighboring municipality has done' CO. 3. TPue b;iraiesot.n 14um&n--Rights Act pruvi(les that the eigplewuent of one pe: -son in place of another, standing by itself, shall not be evidence of an unfair discriminatory practice. /902 a^a c0L!A I_ Cl:'PORTUN!TY Ev PLOYER 607 F; s.er 'c'+; sr, -','n P:a'e a.; Mlnne sola Street St rein, himnesofa 55101 Ic X7) 9°5625 or(EOQ)65e' 9741 AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL JULY 15, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. Parks & Recreation Department B. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA pa's f -E. 1\ lf�.lIH. PC16�.�1. .l4J. �vx0K. e t -V: Pa.'s Personnel Items Contractors Licenses Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation/ Retirement to 18 Months Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Office Park 2nd) Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) Project 439, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) Project 441, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (O'Neil Pond Outlet) Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating) Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition Final Plat Approval, Overhill Farm 2nd Addition Final Plat Approval, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition Project 85-M, Final Acceptance (Wescott Hills 4th Addition -Storm Sewer) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS ,P� ?1A. Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets ASB. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition �a �rlC. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition _ Sanitary Sewer (Continued from July 1, 1986, meeting) OOn,SIE. Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Rd. -Trunk Storm Sewer 9OF. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of fib, Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City (Continued from the June 17, 1986, Meeting) VI. OLD BUSINESS Qn,ga A. Off -Sale Liquor License for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) Continued from June 17, 1986, Meeting P� q3 B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments VII. NEW BUSINESS f 5A. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/Dakota County HRA First -Time Homebuyers Program B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation) Duplex Lot Split for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lot 5, Block 3, Abutting Vienna Lane, NE pG 1/4 of Section 31 C. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 S.F. of Addi- tional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign, Dakota County Bank, Lot 2, Block 2, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park D. Rezoning (Overhill Properties, Inc.) from R-2, Residential Double, to R-1, Residential Single, for Lots 1,2,5,6,&7, of Block 2, Overhill Farm lst Addition, Located at Dodd & Cliff Roads, SW 1/4 of Section 25 E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company - U Mark Baird) for an Advertising Sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Located South of I-494 & East of Pilot Knob Road, NW 1/4 of Section 3 pa,l� '. Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition 00 (Sienna Corporation) Consisting of 69 Single Family Lots on Approximately 34 Acres Located West of Dodd Road & North of ---- Cliff Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25 q \16G. Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office P O Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant on Approximately 7 Acres & a Rezoning from GB (General Business) & LI (Light Industrial) to Commercial Planned Development & a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment on Lots 1,2,&3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park & Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, Located at Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive, NW 1/4 of Section 3 H. Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds (Robert Engstrom) \ O Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19.6 Acres & a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) Abutting Pilot Knob Road to the West, South of St. John Neumann Church, SW 1/4 of Section 22 jAAI. Preliminary Plat for The Trails of Thomas Lake (New Horizon �C) Homes) Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units on Approximately 14 Acres Located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, North of Clemson \S`II & West of Thomas Lake Road, NW 1/4 of Section 28 J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments (Design Collective) Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres & a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) Located South of Violet Lane Abutting Federal Drive, SE 1/4 of Section 16 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS f, ,146 A. League of Minnesota Cities Sound Level Meter Program �(J B. Public Improvement Projects (A 1. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicols Road) Ir�� 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) M. 3. Contract 86-11, Award Contract (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham p \x'.1'13 Corporate Center) I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) IA 16151104 3 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM. CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 10, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the July 15, 1986, agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the July 1 meeting and special minutes for the June 26 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration: DEPARTMENT, HEAD BUSINESS; A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item L. Parks and Recreation Department --At the July 1, 1986, City Council meeting, the Parks & Recreation Director and Advisory Commission were given direction to proceed with further negotia- tions on expanding the acreage of Northview Athletic Field and to acquire the 15 acre Ohman parcel adjacent to the Fairway Hills plat. Regarding consideration to purchase the Barr parcel located on Highway 3 for a future athletic site, was continued and the Director of Parks & Recreation was asked analyze certain tracts of land throughout the City that might be available for _ ___future athletic fields and present a map and findings to the City Council for review. That study has been completed and for a copy of the study, refer to pages 7i through 5 . The Director of Parks & Recreation will be available to review the. study during Department Head Business. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the Director of Parks & Recreation and Advisory Commission regarding land acquisition for a future athletic field site. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 9, 1986 HE: ATHLETIC SITE ACQUISITION At the City Council meeting on July 1, the City Council reviewed Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation for athletic site purchases. The City Council approved the Commission's recommendation for the acquisition ® and development of two of the three sites. The third site was continued pending further reviewal. Council expressed some concern over the proximity of this parcel to the City's eastern edge, and a desire for a more centrally located facility. Staff was asked to provide information concerning which other parcels had been reviewed, and the general process for searching and reviewing alternative locations. Attached to this memorandum are three graphics, which will help to depict the process Staff used in searching out suitable parcels. The first graphic locates all commercial and industrial property, and properties which have been —platted for residential or other purposes. - Other parcels blotted out are existing park holdings, public facilities such as school property. The second graphic depicts parcels which Staff and Commission have reviewed. The extent of each reviewal varied with the particular parcel. Some parcels were explored and rejected, because of severe topography. Other parcels were ® reviewed, but excluded because an indication of a high sales price. Finally, others were reviewed after preliminary site planning was initiated. The final composite shows remaining parcels which have not been reviewed, but were excluded for one reason or another. An intensive review can be made on any of these parcels, if the Council feels it would be appropriate to review and discuss these further. Staff was also directed to review the parcel immediately south of the City's municiple center. This parcel is approximately 8.74 acres in size, and abutts Pilot Knob Road. This parcel is currently being offered for sale with a $70,000 asking price. Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan has prepared a concept plan for this site. This concept plan will be presented at the Council meeting. KV/bls v STAFF REVIEWED PARCELS 8' s{MENAOTA �nrs. \�'_' C _ _" \ Vii/ • •I , _ J M Yt Ilii � 4 - � ' ^ e •�I'I I � � l� :rte' �® I > _ A ./Aa e KP VIII LI I I ��. •( \ Y • � ]Y, • / � � • • i� �I a E •• J 1 ,I d a. V III f �7i • • I'' po .w e "� ^ �. •• l �Yn P't+ � • } 3 �, _'E.� f$.% � � 14.E 6e • tU Ftp ,. y • A L. iswl •7a IMF / :::^ A I •� � _ — _ � —. I • • M � � ` w• 1 I � Y d 1, w ., � ., • � I• ` ro w II w I( I .1111 . ri °7 �n • • � qZ • 1' IA wr •1 , v • /r) I�r • / 1. I bo• '• Illl I ._..�_. e'• J I .. •, 1 I .. I 111 I r w. /'F'� p ^ -c ro <� •a . -x r l + •! n 1 }. . we rl V f ,J ptttr.i ' �. gyp' I ro.. Ix `_ ' I w `'/ 1 � ��I rr- r ',f�T "'IIIIIM.:'r CXPI'� 7k _ • � r' � M _ w `rr.V AKPF � y r M E�.i Z� •� u 14 r •.c t1 Q : / �` M� F r / 1 • y r SII ��I I {, � �c n+�-«St4 ��I •pry ,',>I� p'L� `,., p�lj �' 00 i JA_LE v>LLEY NOSEYOUNi Zoning Map - City of Eagan Zoning Map Indexing 1-11 I(O!( ' u - unne rnun rr - nm w. !�•♦•••1•,A• •♦ IIIA•.•♦ 241t 5 Jdw.41i .. III N♦I ••I•' • - i•I.IA11•. •. n • Oia O••�••i �� �ie�� �••eI,�1A1111•111•a•♦♦I,I I+#�i�-' raw ••O •. r` •♦♦• •••• d�!%�•��.�•.♦.�•.I.�.I.�.♦.♦111♦.♦.e' ♦ iiiri�J� ►w•wp0• �. ►L,♦I♦IIQwQ♦o1,►101i11•ii•.O•i\ • J �s s0•✓. 0 . !•p•..•i/E.- '.I `OO•IO •eI�1AA �As•.O•Ois • V,• i '.•i :•i••;Jri �' •� J�LO.!• J �.. « w1 • ♦wwl/♦Iw r♦ I 1 •.Q•I♦♦I�"IIIA. va :.. •III . I • � �,r,��.lfw•�%r .i�� } { !i•Ir i f ••i ♦ r • '. J • .�0�•e.♦� � - R" !),fJnS. 4 .r•.♦� - '.p' V, •..•Ilii •r Ws6 .;111 I JI�IirI•Jjr1•I�I• fig.• izF.•. ♦ l - 1 • J' - I•o' !Ir• •di i , Ric o ' y", �I is ••• I S ) 1�..'t 5 i 1' A.. 142 7A ppl •y�1 �Y11 �••• r I i 31 I ABY Y NAA46 11,7' +� f Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Receive Peti ion, Wescott Road (Streets) --Enclosed on pages through is a copy of a petition received from several residents of the South Hills Addition as referenced on page _� requesting a reduction in speed limit and the improving of khat gravel portion of Wescott Road, between the highline crossing and South Hills Addition. Enclosed on page /() is a map showing the relationship of the present improved section from Elrene Road to T.H. 149 along with that segment being constructed under Contract 86-13. Prior to the improvement of this remaining half - mile section of Wescott Road, it will be necessary to install the appropriate utilities to service potential future development of adjacent properties. Therefore, if the Council is to give any consideration to this requested improvement, it should consider not only the street improvement but also the required underlying utilities. During 1985, the City requested Mn Dot District 9 to perform speed aurveys--on various streets -within the City of Eagan to determine the appropriate enforceable speed limit that would be approved by the Commissioner of Transportation. The results of that study indicated that the portion from South Hills Drive to T.H. 149 should be established as 50 M.P.H. with that portion from Lexington Avenue to South Hills Drive (gravel) not posted. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition •for the upgrading of Wescott Road and order/deny the installation of appropriate improvements. I RECEIVED 3 1958.; We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently increased speed limit of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. 44/f �st� J'osz 457- 7J Aa ✓ 4L�T-'�F�z�>:i J I RECEIVED ,i uic We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently increased speed limit'of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. 6 woe I \� as 9 ok- .� •ti r M ..• e Iy7Y� w 1 �i •quo'. y 1 f . i`� '' 3Air� y'.:q� .... • 4� •� .i'i•�4. � . i b ADTION DI��--,:a >l�. �/ji�.,a�O'10 4 f ... ••'vy- aw'r � q4Q, u p' 12 14 t1• Q ,r •�. r.wat. rw.,. � O ''10� w • 1 r LLJ Is �.i � � - ur"w .or-- i}::4;149;:{: ::::.,:::•:. }:i• io . �� _�— p ' LANE . . .�+.60U9N wlLw Iwr .... •�1„„ l �c \ Ik- . � ,s•��, � Ix lep W. 4 in Ri"i ; - • .:. ”. - . ••�: ii}rr':L:::' ••'�' •••':i}iii}}. • . _ •..vr •':: }i: i.. ' i y O . •' ••' �.+j:: i _, ..e . .o -z Sou •••. �m°° :':';,:ifs••.; ,y UJ jr Q MILL] t.b ✓r to �'� •�w .r WESCOTT •• ..•w...• • ..• ROAD i . WE COTT "Bass wall PFZ lTtow St Gu ecis N. Vg. 1/4 af'i, 24, T� F� p' Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three There are fifteen (15) items on ,the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussionrequired in brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: •Item 1.. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Fourteen applications were received by the City for the vacant position of part-time, clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. Of these applications, six applicants were given typing tests, written tests., and, were interviewed. It.'is the recommendation of Administrative Assistant Duffy and Administrative Secretary Finnegan that Corrine Smith be hired to fill the vacant clerk -typist position'. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Corrine Smith to fill the vacant position of clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. The appointment is to be effective July 14, 19'86. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four CONTRACTOR LICENSE B. Contractor's Licenses -=Attached- on page /3 is a list of contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client's permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDEREDON THIS ITEM: To approve the list of Contractor Licenses are presented. • 0 iv i CONTRACTORS' LICENSE JULY 15, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. FIRST LANDMARK BUILDERS 2. HOMECARE, INC 3. HOUSTON CONSTRUCTION 4. MADERA HOMES INC 5. MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO 6. MIDWEST FENCE & MFG CO ® 7. MOE-OSUM CONSTRUCTION CO 8. M.J. MOSER CONSTRUCTION 9. MARTIN SCHUTROP CONST 10. T.J. CONTRACTING INC BEATING/VENTILATING 1. AIR REFRIGERATION 2. ALBERS SHEETMETAL & VENT 3. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG ® PLUMBING 1. DAVE DEMPSEY PLBG. 2. FREEPORT HARDWARE (PHIL'S PLBG & HTG) 3. LICHLITER BROS 4. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG 5. MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES INC 6. NIKKO PLBG 7. QUALITY PLBG. 8. ROSEVILLE PLBG & HTG INC 9. TERRY'S PLUMBING 10. WOODBURY MECHANICAL INC Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five EXTENSION OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE C. Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation or Retirement to Eighteen Months --On April 7, 1986, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) was signed into law by President Reagan. COBRA requires an employer to provide the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees and dependents to the following limits: 1. Eighteen month's from the date of termination of employment, for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct or reduction of hours; or from the date of reduction • in an employee's hours, if such a reduction causes a loss or reduction of the employee's coverage. 2. 36 months for the employee's spouse and dependent children from the date of: a. The death of the covered employee. . b. Divorce or legal separation of the covered employee. C. The covered employee becomes entitled to benefits under Medicare. d. A dependent child ceases to be eligible as a dependent according to the terms of the insurance plan. Continuation of coverage will end prior to either. the 18 or 36 month period as of the date on which: • 1. The person covered under the continuation fails to make timely payments as required under the plan., 2. The continued person becomes eligible under another group medical plan. 3. The continued dependent becomes eligible for Medicare. 4. A spouse who is continuing because of divorce or legal separation remarries and becomes covered under a group health plan. 5. The group health plan, insured or self-insured, ends. The continuation coverage is required to be identical to the coverage provided to persons actively participating in the plan. The necessary premium may be required to be paid by the person whose coverage is continued. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM C. (continued') State Law currently requires continuation for 12 months instead of 18 months, and this, is the procedure that the City of Eagan has been following,. It is recommended that this continuation period be extended to 18 months to 'conform to Federal law. The entire cost of the premium will be paid by the person whose coverage is continued. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the City of Eagan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees and depen- dents to 18 or 36 months (depending upon the circumstances) as provided by Federal law from the date of termination of employ- ment for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct_. 0 1-'5 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 446, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 2ND ADDITION D. Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale office Park 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assess- ment roll completed. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 446 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addi- tion) and schedule the public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 43.5, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER, PUBLIC HEARING EAGAN WOODS OFFICE PARK) E. Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roil/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) --Final costs for the installation of streets and utilities to service the above referenced subdivision have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adop- tion. aACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 435 (Eagan Woods. Office Park) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 439, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING SAFARI 2ND ADDITION F. Project 439, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Safari 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 439 (Safari 2nd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. ,/( Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 441, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT PUBLIC G. Project 441, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Qrder Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Westbury 3rd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 441 (Westbury 3rd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. 43, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING O'NEIL TRUNK STORM SEWER OUTLET H. Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --Although construction is not, 1008 complete on the above referenced project, all assess- ments associated with this project are trunk area rates which are not dependent upon the final costs of the project_ Subsequent- ly,, the final assessment roll using these set trunk area assessment rates .have been completed. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 443 (O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. 17 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine CONTRACT 86-8, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 1986 SEALCOATING I. Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating)--At the July 1 Council meeting, the Council received bids and awarded the contract for the 1986 Sealcoating Program to Allied Blacktop - ping. Due to the exceptional bids received, the 1986 program based on bids received ($69,775.58) was considerably below the 1986 budget ($122,000.00)_ Subsequently, the Council directed the Staff to review our Sealcoating Program and work with the contractor to determine if additional streets could be added to this year's contract to take advantage of the exceptional bids received. Staff has prepared a Change Order which would add approximately $50,805.00 to the sealcoating contract bringing the total amount to $120,580.63. Enclosed on page is a listing of streets that are being added to this year' program under this Change Order. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #1 to Contract 86-8 (1986 Sealcoating) in the amount of $50,8'05.05. PAGE NO. 00001 07/10/86 STREET NAME Thomas Ln Richard's Ct Walden Dr Kirkwood Dr Parkview Ln labbert Cir udbury Ln Sheffield Ln Sheffield Cir Shevlin Ct Golfview Ln ** TOTAL ** PAGE NO. 00001 - 07/10/86 - 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -2 AGGREGATE FROM Cliff Rd Thomas Ln Thomas Ln Lexington Av Lexington Av Parkview Ln Wilderness Run Rd Sherwood Way Sheffield Ln Sherwood Way Yankee Doodle TO 200' W of Walden CDS CDS Parkview Ln CDS CDS Wilderness Run Rd Norwood Dr CDS CDS Dead End 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -3 GRANITE AGGREGATE STREET NAME FROM 11!cmserve Dr Yankee Doodle Rd Towerview Rd Pilot Knob Rd Slater Rd Cliff Rd Robin Ln Blackhawk Rd Blackhawk Rd Cliff Rd Slater Rd Cinnamon Rdg Trl Cinnanom Ridge Trl Cliff Rd Rahn Way Rahn Rd Rahn Rd Cliff Rd Cedarview Dr Old Cedar Hwy Library Park'g Lot ** TOTAL ** 01101 TH 13 CDS Storland Rd Blackhawk Rd Diffley Rd Cinnamon Trl Slater Rd Dead End Rahn Way Cedarvale Blvd SQ.YDS. 4786 2230 2400 1927 4260 1166 5038 2530 1430 2033 2836 30636 SQ. YDS. 9416 4820 19452 8665 26350 6036 8836 1476 2959 4504 9435 101949 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten 478, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT J. Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) --Recently, staff received an application for development of the property east of Lexington Avenue and north of Dffley Road. While this appli- cation is being processed through the Planning Commission at their July meeting to be considered by Council in August, the developer has requested that the preliminary study and feasibility report be initiated to provide the sanitary sewer service necessary for this parcel's development. Recognizing that there are no is guarantees of approval through this staff/commission/council review process, yet guaranteed all costs associated with this report and detailed plans and specifications., if for some reason this project is not approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 478 (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) and order the feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications. 479, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILI INGTON NORTHVIEW PARK - TRUNK STORM S] K. Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) --Similar to the reasoning associated with the petition for Project 478 discussed previously, the developer of the Lexington South PUD (Jim Curry) •has requested the Council to prepare the feasibility report and detailed plans for the installation of trunk storm sewer facilities for that area east of Lexington Avenue between Northview Park entrance road and Diffley Road. This trunk storm sewer will be necessary for the development of Lexington Avenue in 19'88 and any earlier development of land within this portion of the Lexington South PUD. Mr. Curry has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report and detailed plans if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, and order the feasibility report and detailed plans. P6 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER ADDITION L. Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Wyndham Corporate Center Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road opposite Corporate Center Drive,by the Trammel Crow Corporation: Enclosed on pages and 7-'3 are copies of the legally described final plat and site plan for the construction of the Eagan Woods Garden Hotel, showing the modification of the road entrance to Pilot Knob Road. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat at the time of approval by Council action on August 20, 1985, have been complied with,. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM•: To approve the final plat for Wyndham Corporate Center Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N 4F-XHISIT "A" • WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER [�yo..w.,� Asa.. yL.l y4raum LOT BLOCK ----n....�.[-. •lr yr.r�•/s.. a, ria. �......F--7-- 4 �f ril ILSr L16 W IY L,, 1 V S[[. . w u u,nYl Imm > ,o -x,' Id ♦O + e j 1 O - x YI1. H o i t Yrnrlle. awn ss[.uvY 1. C •1•Aa.YeI.Y.Owu4- R � on.vm orzo. ` (ai Ill{ bl •:Inill(o a umnun w rn .l .. e(e) :'I vti-A+•u•.741-C ava.a I Y •�•ly r .u'.:.. 1 I I -------- - EeOJOJ� MOCOS . �- 9EYR 1 iMA I• 1- 1- a. tesla--� • , Z' i • lI 'F a G a J W _ v.l ----n....�.[-. •lr yr.r�•/s.. a, ria. �......F--7-- 4 �f ril ILSr L16 W IY L,, 1 V S[[. . w u u,nYl Imm > ,o -x,' Id PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES ♦O + e j 1 O - x YI1. H o i t Yrnrlle. awn ss[.uvY 1. C •1•Aa.YeI.Y.Owu4- R � on.vm orzo. ` (ai Ill{ bl •:Inill(o a umnun �) aar Fl Bram rn .l .. e(e) :'I vti-A+•u•.741-C ava.a I Y •�•ly r .u'.:.. •■;Y I 1 iMA I• 1- r,. -----------s`.`— tesla--� PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES v EXHIBIT "A" CORPORATE CENTER ////DRIVE 1 __..B"B ur NI Hoa oP our auram auwuT m'nuu fro 1ofAL mbv m, TR N 11� Haman T" l � Palllnen Olam be � ....wed.._...._ PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES EAGAN WOOD GARDEN HOTEL It NIIY IY IIIIYItIIM fMI1Y I P{Y[ P[COPO PAVING A SITE DIMENSION PLA CIA Agenda Information Memo July 15, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Twelve FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for Overhill Farm 2nd Addition --we have received a request for final plat approval for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition, located east of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Enclosed on page Z5 is a copy of the proposed final plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of March 19, 1985, have been complied with. Also., all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • a�( OVERHILL FARM / •alTw L•[SECOND ADDITION / �D. W[1,1•LL I•I.1 M.Imrq � uYx3Y[ 891.90 fAL» ., Lau •[» � iv •Ur v xr»Yr w SM DWLRtXrp DOpp xoY no um •DY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT [L[rrwl. Ll>n ARE SHOWN THUS: II IL II I, v bQ A LS W 5 Ix W ua.CWl.i LMLT Yp S r[Ll .,,rAiX YO fOLMNN LW LKt IMI[SS OMIIXRL wdrliFD OtM M -..Ml. VuL" SURV"001L 1.1 wi z5 SEC.25,T-27,R-23 D•i1Li pLp IIII:�•.,Q,. K,A wVl f[W F 1111 TJ,O �.. ,MMMT. LAAP SCALEI I INCH 100 FEET fo » o Xw afo e o[•ol0 1N IKx er If acx wu wrL .D•uKn, Yi Yp YMYD eI KfI[iY19L YG Liel� ail9 NMA6[ 9f11.M M M1tiX 4!K DI M 11[mA IUi d-aI[IIWLL . WIMS} Yai1W'R ISLr/LD iD fFM xfY S%iT Yf14L eENWfe xK 11f4rIK MKA. 0 l j'um'i 11 I I 1 11 I 1 4 'J �1[II [ILIn ' � n • I I Y 1� I I• i' P,Mf[[ Ym•1 I s^ 2 •e 3 x• a. I1" •'�. 1 o I •,-_l IY* i.I1 :• Iq 14.'u.-9: 4 ga .fig I �� � II .[m-1 YI 3 8" I �' I1 Ym- 6 Ba $� I� MOD-• 7 I I �I Y.YI- a � I �1`i[ YW o �., `�•���ma I •s I� � 'i wP I1 NR 4 -]]@--Cw�__I n a Lau •[» � iv •Ur v xr»Yr w SM DWLRtXrp DOpp xoY no um •DY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT [L[rrwl. Ll>n ARE SHOWN THUS: II IL II I, v bQ A LS W 5 Ix W ua.CWl.i LMLT Yp S r[Ll .,,rAiX YO fOLMNN LW LKt IMI[SS OMIIXRL wdrliFD OtM M -..Ml. VuL" SURV"001L 1.1 wi z5 SEC.25,T-27,R-23 D•i1Li pLp IIII:�•.,Q,. K,A wVl f[W F 1111 TJ,O �.. ,MMMT. LAAP SCALEI I INCH 100 FEET fo » o Xw afo e o[•ol0 1N IKx er If acx wu wrL .D•uKn, Yi Yp YMYD eI KfI[iY19L YG Liel� ail9 NMA6[ 9f11.M M M1tiX 4!K DI M 11[mA IUi d-aI[IIWLL . WIMS} Yai1W'R ISLr/LD iD fFM xfY S%iT Yf14L eENWfe xK 11f4rIK MKA. 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, RAHN CLIFF 1ST ADDITION N. Final Plat Approval for Rahn Cliff 1st Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition located south of Cliff Road and west of I -35E. Enclosed on page 2 is a copy of the final plat. All conditions placed on the prel minary plat approval of October 2, 1984 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 26 RAHNCLIFF 1ST ADDITION —j•• ! T^ • ` ^::: :ai 3C ry ul wr N Ixm nolo^: 1"n ".c all.r.,. rrunn .r 1'• •••• • • •y :: • [; i^nrl x 11un.c.. r..wn lo. wort w unr.lnr. Y•� Y 1 ROADI "'•'r ,n Iw xr.......N.... .1. rtwnl. ••• Yw it on.u, iu1..r xlw.Yu. 1 �. �• CF 7-RA!'wRTOP. 'V. i - • r u. r. l.n a..N..1 Y �•" III, u II Ix �� iinn°.iii o.ou..Ym.+ n, Imnp 1 F'LA]Ji lR2 !T.".I. Y JI/=Jd1P/ n, L•:IJLIJ -may 'ie r✓•• ow V.Y - WUIY. a lellnry -� w w 1L4I2 IIYJYN'. )pop _ . /I (.` FlR• �..-j�\�� �= \ / � � I.iNni"1 Y.r�l�r•.1 Iw`.or4..r°,r r.lr Y Yr Ic IL- L � •s,.ry m./r' "qr � '.r 1 Ibn[r u r r. x.e N .I r p'ri' rr 1 �`6, Y u rxr 11 Yulr. 1; . I.rl..IoM r .uu 1�.1 rfb n.l a. I1 Lii Z Y.M. B L 0 C K a / I \t i� HN, ii,,it ii••M ..ii n„i...., m lu 11 .. 1.,11. I,r. n.. el YIJI ` L' (JI1 ^f V xr eS Ixlpl n. Y.'n n.ri, i.. 10• m1.. 11 '� ° 1 1�-- — \16- I •.I 4 _ aY iii.. wii iq�:`ilaiil. 1 - $- _ II`` {// Cj , t 1it.•x MT lu u:I- IRAHAI t'L"YPOURTq w••+.r `lq /'/ o -;'A .,u..: .a..xr.rsii`,.N. i .1i.1 n �n:i.�°It r.r.N. r4 pu• u nw . Ir Ub aw,[4 .1 '°- • OUTLOi D .. 4.nr IT' IT iix m I ml n.m Nrn... uir nu. 5 r \a. r :� .�q � .ii 1. In.a. r— I'll t.xtin. Yn.. nlna.r. q dp------. _ .r..1 rini nax: Inw Irli n / IM T117-11 107iw 1 N Irt Irl, r 11.1 er'. Ypr •\S .••`Ll x ui.11'� � � � L�Y 0. ,.,blIln, in .' 4 - \ i l� j �/ , •i' u.w Q Im 11.1 .I Ix OUTLOT A 1 4� - �, �I I` wnl. I,i ins ollnl cru. [..0 r � "7 liu•Iriiiir lii .min u.Yoe ice. n.rie Lu•• • I x.n .w ul1 "°"x. r�n louln.,[.. w1 �In �Y C Yaml. u.x un. m. wuli. IT' F..o.viu11 nJ Ib. YeluY ru uli.�iii �u li— r N "R_ ! i�. .� �`• s ml.[ .m.iii. PUT ui."�. miii, w p °.inr ` / ■)rF \ � !� r 11 Nnlx YI.Ir Wn11 Yr.r 6 `/O ♦. :i• t Ihnneli•.iY�nnlrlito li, GlC f Cr ilw. ..m ..-r. n1 ..r 'il nn rrwunr wamn�w .. n... In 0).0 1 •i1e-ilmw �) 1,1 L----• "`� i;` L �`t ..(, nnum m-ur : n wu. w..,.Yw aulwn[. Ir Iern..r .. 1, Y r ., Vrp.f ,,�' a`' I,i ..l.l In N 4i•N .N = L Aliil.nnyl Y�el' Wn11. i13 C YRAHNCLIFF IYLOURT� Fri/'� ty, �' [ice Ir: r.nw, Lu :i •• u 1 — C_ -- ��•�/ / I ` lrai it pxl-lull I 4.1rw,.. W.o wn ...x ;'—W... .... 4 I : —Yr T p 1 • .i. w.xu.1 (npinr • .n. Nrw i •• •OI axulr Vn w bn. In 4 ur Y _•_ w S� WTLOT B MxOr N nm r. .• rix bN rurlx. Y ul1 Nu a w.m.Tlsr ammw 7/ •/ \Y •Mr.xlq un Y.. rNL x 4x _YI Y n_ N. �L.9nw: ...Y.. . ,. .. - w.......n[ +�`r..� .. Y u_ —J� IYYYxw....wnlw A `1l _ i`I `i iiilxLl ... ..... ur�m "mmw. �I / l -I r111 In I.n .IN 114,xnEln'rjlll u III wrr. Y1.11 Wnu YLll.r •a P.•• CA. I: DDIVZ1 i l "m.n. _...�..�.4 � : . . .rlb.r �o .xnl nw..ial :°iiAii :uiinii........nMt - .� Tv'ur. ui rlu �1 u` um .1. ux wiiinn er li, Ui f)C �M//•)J'!YL )JOW .YMnI 1. Y u1Nx1 eIx Va., Y[r.l Lw.r�4w11 u.Y \b. lYi:A14111 • . {.1 \ l R.:r P: n;.-9 ":L Mrm•n,�~�� Ix..u. nn .11 uu xn x.I ITT. � It;:il_i 1, • Lr.. 1 • w bola t. r.un.n. l.N s,...pr un. anr.u. 4inu...r rl-• GTclr [.�� r i. sou OI nIM[[Ou It UMTES Ilw wN[n Ipap [N'r m x[nnu M ler.y�ry YmM'. br1111u1. .I. .Vel.. p.( r ew�n..mwr It NICITIS 1 1 11' Ixw Ylen w 41t r of le .1 It'll. A.S.IdryYr UT Alt. rWYY Lr lr x.nl. L. r. Irr a xlnw. 1 -L y. ja]N Yl.0 W..°. nlw •. ' LY. 11111 ut 1'n WI°i.. m/tl'.erl Ia/Caup [YnL 1, txnn - . IS All rx l.[ to nAt Pin xr M I, to .n bell.. xmnru [tar. xu.0 t. 1,.slopm..1 un-xo mva rYl[elxl., xrlru r.lr n.Iw JAMES R. HILL, INC. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 85-M, FINAL ACCEPTANCE O. Project '85-M, Final Acceptance (Wescott Hills 4th Addition - Storm Sewer --As a part of the development of the Wescott Hills 4th Addition, an existing trunk storm sewer line had to be re- located. This work has been completed with all final inspections being performed by a representative of the Public Works Department and our consulting engineering firm, with a recommendation for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85-M (Wescott Hills 4th Addition - Storm Sewer) and accept for perpetual ® maintenance. 40 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PUBLIC HEARINGS PROJECT 476, HIGHVIEW AVENUE - STREETS A. Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets -- In response to a petition received from several property owners who use Highview Avenue, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing bei g scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages Z O through is a copy of the feasibility for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the original petition submitted, requesting improve- ment of this ,section of roadway. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to those property owners who are proposed to be assessed under this project. This segment of Highview Avenue was originally proposed to be upgraded under Project 292 in 1980. At that time, the estimated rate per front foot was $21.00 with the final assessment rate being $19.24 per front _foot. The estimate contained in this report is very conservative based on the assumption that the majority of the existing gravel base will not be able to be salvaged due to the final subgrade evaluation along with the plan and __.__._.._profile design of the final street configuration. More detailed and accurate cost estimates can be obtained once detailed plans and specifications have been prepared and even moreso after formal bids have been received. The consulting engineer will be available to discuss this project during the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 476, Highview Avenue (Streets) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi- cations. 29 REPORT ON HIGHVIEW AVENUE • (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 660' WEST STREET IMPROVEMENTS --- - _-. - PROJECT No. 476 - ® EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49396 BoKcawa, Rade rs, f4mje,2j m a 4ddocla4&, Ync. 8t Pa"4 Ma m"a& 0 Bonestroo, Rosen 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 11, 1986 Anderlik & Associates, Inc. Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) Street Improvements Project No. 476 Our File No. 49396 Dear Mayor and Council: Our• G. Nunnuuu. P.E NuYrn W. A.c I4 E. J-,Ih C- And,,hk. Y.E. Nmd/wd A. Lenr rrY. Y. E. Nrrhdrd E. TYrnn. P.E. Junin C. Ubun. P.E. Glrnn N. C.R. Y E. Amh A. GwJun. Y.E. )hmnY, E. Nuyn. Y.E. Ri,nwd W. Pwur. P.E. Nuhn G. ] humrh, P.E. Marvin L Surmlu: P, E, Uunuld C. &,,ardl. P.E. J"' A, Nuurdun, P.L'. Murk A. H,.0 . P. E. lid K. hod, P.£. MrrAYd T. Numnrunn, P E. R.P,, N. PJ%/rrlr, /U. M,,d U. Lwhum. P L', rhunw W. K... P.E. hfuharlC L'n'A. Y.E. Aurin 1. Wdlu. PE. Jurnn R. Mulrnd. P.E. Arnnnh P. Andrnun. P.E. Kmh A. CYAnwnn, P.L. hlark N. Rgfs. P.£. Nuhn C. NuurE, A. 1.4 Thum., E. A.,... P, E. Sron A. YuYnY. P E. Chu,In A. EnN,mr Lm M. Yur+rhhy Nudun M. M.. • Swun M. Ebrlin Enclosed is our report for Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west), Project No. 476. This report covers street improvements and includes a pre— liminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the 'Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, 80NESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. l / � Mark A. Hanson Date: June 11, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 liApproved by: Department of Pu lic Works Date: •�r,=-L. r 5696d 30 Year 3 Anniversary SCOPE: This project provides for street Improvement for the unpaved portion of Highview Avenue from Pilot Knob Road to a point 660' to the west. The pro- posed improvements include upgrading Highview Avenue to a residential standard (concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving) for streets in the City of Eagan. Highview Avenue is abutted on both the north and south side by six (6) single-family, platted parcels. This portion of Highview Avenue also serves as a major access to the homes in the Valley View Plateau Additions. Traffic counts recently taken by the City of Eagan measured the average daily traffic ® (ADT) at the east end of Highview Avenue to be 499 ADT while at the west end 0 was 323 ADT. Although these traffic counts are well in excess of what should be encountered on a gravel road, they also indicate that 36% of the traffic is generated from the lots in the Highview Acres development. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering -- standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Highview Avenue between Pilot Knob Road and a point 660' to the west of Pilot Knob Road is an existing gravel road. Water main and sanitary sewer were constructed in this section of Highview Avenue in 1968 and 1970, respectively. In 1980 storm sewer was extended from an existing storm sewer in Pilot Knob Road to the low point in Highview Avenue which is located at the westerly end of the project proposed herein. As part of that same project, Highview Avenue was also upgraded with concrete curb and bituminous surfacing from the westerly end of this project to Highridge Terrace. 5696d Page 1. 3Y Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to upgrade Highview Ave- nue to a 32' wide butiminous street with concrete curb and gutter. It is assumed for purposes of this report the existing aggregate base is not of suf- ficient depth or cross section to be utilized in the upgrading of this street. It is also assumed common excavation will be required to construct the street to a proper elevation and cross section. Upon completing the required excava- tion a 6 inch thick Class 5 1006 crushed aggregate base will be constructed, in conjunction with bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, manhole adjustment, and driveway and boulevard restoration. However, as part of the preparation of the plans and specifications a more detailed analysis will be done to better evaluate if the existing aggregate base can be utilized. In addition, it may be less costly to construct a thicker bituminous base course resulting in less excavation and aggregate base construction depending on the final design cross section of the road. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Assessment and Construction Area SE 1/4 Section 4 is Highview Acres Lot 1 Lot 2 (021-00) Lot 2 (022-00) Lot 7 (074-00) Lot 8 (081-00) Lot 8 (082-00) 5696d Page 2. 33 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $47,670 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30C and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs. The 10 assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the cost of street on a front foot basis to the abutting property it serves. Lot I and Lot 8 (081-00) were previously assessed for their entire frontage abutting Pilot Knob Road at the time Pilot Knob Road was upgraded in 1980. Therefore, as part of this project it is pro- posed that a 75 foot corner lot credit be applied to that frontage abutting ® Highview Avenue for Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00). REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Street $47,670 Street Assessment $47,670 $47,670 $47,670 -0- All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there are no funds required from the major street fund. Page 3. 5696d 3� PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 5696d Page 4. 35 June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 Fall, 1986 Spring, 1987 May, 1988 • APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HICHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' West) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 + 5% Contingencies $ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin & Bond Interest TOTAL...................................... Page 5. 5696d 3� $ 2,700 1,000 :1M 6,650 2,940 3,150 5,000 180 6,300 --- 3,000 1,200 2,000 $34,920 1,750 $36,670 11,000 $47,670 900 Cu. yds. Common excavation @ $3.00/cu, yd. 200 Cu. yds. Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu. yd. 100 Cu. yds. Select granular borrow @ $8.00/cu, yd. ® 950 Ton Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 210 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $14.00/ton 210 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $15.00/ton 25 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $200.00/ton 120 Cale. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1,50/gal, .1,260 Lin. ft. .,Surmountable concrete curb .& gutter @ $5.00/lin, ft 6 Each Driveway restoration @ $500.00/each 6 Each Adjust MH and CV box @ $200.00/each ® 1,000 Sq. yda. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq. yd. Total + 5% Contingencies $ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin & Bond Interest TOTAL...................................... Page 5. 5696d 3� $ 2,700 1,000 :1M 6,650 2,940 3,150 5,000 180 6,300 --- 3,000 1,200 2,000 $34,920 1,750 $36,670 11,000 $47,670 Parcel Description HIGHVIEW ACRES Lot 1 Lot 2 (021-00) Lot 2 (022-00) Lot 7 (074-00) Lot 8 (081-00) Lot 8 (082-00) APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL HIGHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 Assessable Total Footage Rete/F.F. Assessment 205 (1) $44.55 9,133 165 44.55 7,351 165 44.55 7,351 330 44.55 14,702 65 (1) 44.55 2,896 140 44.55 6,237 1,070 $47,670 (1) A 75' corner lot credit was applied 5696d Page 6. 37 • r 1 U EXISTING STREET PROPOSED STREETIMPROVEMENTS SURMOUNTA,qLE CONCRETE CURB 81 GUTTER 34 BACK TO BACK 2 (022-00) 7 -(074-00) 2 (021-00) END CONSTRUCTION BEGIN CONSTRUCTION I/XXXI/X�75' CORNER LOT CREDIT .............. ::•ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 0 loo 200' GroPhic Scale in Feet HIGHVIEW AVENUE (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 660' WEST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 476 EAGAN, MINNESOTA M O Z v cr 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I II I m O Z Y EXISTING STREET BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANIDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul,, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1988 Comm. 49398 FIG. No. 1 Pao3- 41-7& ,�,xL,,C�, April 8, 1986 Tom Colbert Eagan Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom, I'm writing to call your attention to the deplorable condition • of Highview Ave. in northern Eagan from Pilot Knob to approx- imately 600 feet west of Pilot Knob. As you may be aware, this section of Highview Ave. was left untouched in 1980 when the rest of the street was upgraded by installing curb, gutter, storm sewer and blacktop. In the spring this road becomes a quagmire of mud and potholes; summer brings almost unbearable dust as well as complaints to the Public Works Department requesting that something be done to settle the dust. These conditions contribute to extra— ordinarily high maintenance costs which are borne by all resi— dents of the city. This letter will serve as notice that a petition to upgrade this road is being circulated and will be brought to the Council for their thoughtful consideration and action within the next few weeks. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ed Martin 1474 Highview Ave. Eagan, MN 55121 Phone: 4544-419� 0 7zel— c,vvy '3� So Ed i/14SEC. 4,TI!79 R23 _ HIGHVIEW AVENUE PETITIONERS -.rel. •. •.:\'. v�. W: !': :':: ll'f: f':. lff:•: - . :;:r: 2 :{:}:{•Q{;; iiii}Iii}i: >' (•?<?I:-}r%[%:j f 020-O2 H/GH✓YerY tj A , 026-75 1 4Gy 91 E64on ARK 020-75 CITY al E94 eoyr.- [. 6 Pe9rr^�A. C c ago/yn [. Mary C.Sp�sYJ s � / P 9 z / G John 6 E✓ni CC I 9039 U9 T I OM NO. 033869 1 2Y F' 7 I e 13 iG HIGHVIEW ro 01094-0000 LlwrvnCC T d � v.3 Aifr iJ �'r� \�v.. it �•w'•�y :y. S�oi [ _ "JL r-tYtcJ!��_= !l 2 09�i e ,� ''' 6 ROADWAY IN QUESTION PETITIONERS Gr-Yt/IEW t ` y T 4 VK 7 'P.i:e>} :�>:�:,"•�,: � [o {:;{i :viii'%�r'r, J � .`. . ......: L •:•i:'r:::: BRIDGE.VIEW••• AVE. hi:: :;. -.rel. •. •.:\'. v�. W: !': :':: ll'f: f':. lff:•: - . :;:r: 2 :{:}:{•Q{;; iiii}Iii}i: >' (•?<?I:-}r%[%:j f 020-O2 H/GH✓YerY tj A , 026-75 1 4Gy 91 E64on ARK 020-75 CITY al E94 eoyr.- [. 6 Pe9rr^�A. C c ago/yn [. Mary C.Sp�sYJ s � / P 9 z / G John 6 E✓ni CC I 9039 U9 T I OM NO. 033869 1 2Y F' 7 I e 13 iG HIGHVIEW ro 01094-0000 LlwrvnCC T d � v.3 Aifr iJ �'r� \�v.. it �•w'•�y :y. S�oi [ _ "JL r-tYtcJ!��_= !l 2 09�i e ,� ''' 6 ROADWAY IN QUESTION PETITIONERS TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECLEV D il'I..a id u We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS i�74-6 C' /r3C c/ g2.Sr6 1ly75 �r. erlr� p'�yey X473 2ruCMG�' /�Cv vY�yj 111-7 _'_ rt l TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED MAN 1 IN"O' We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface.. NAME ADDRESS al.. -vie �_' Z" 6e � 1"e 4 4 f / A /� Ax 5` �t - 4 y�T Z, w % L/_5— % Vie' i / 5Ss Y,, RECEIVED P"�^,� 1 19' TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS Ui.Cty'F:iJ TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME p ADDRESS ys� -si -7 Z It 1� o T • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT, DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition --We have received a request from:. the Rosemount School District #196 to vacatethe existing watermain utility easement that is dedicated with the final plat for the above referenced subdivision. This easement is required to be vacated based on the final alignment of the watermain based on a sealed construction: A new easement has been described and conveyed to the City. As of this date., the staff has not received any object'to this proposed utility easement vacation. Enclosed on page is a -copy of the easements proposed to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and vacate the utility easement as described for the Deerwood School Addition. H -r--fN I ZA I F.X=r t:;:l N r, N V-4 %- DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION A, NW Co n•^ -; A, k of 7W17,fW23 73, NE Cor..., .f AI // w 11Y h'WV4f.rAe 56- 114 1 NW rid A S-S6.%/.f sm. 4 Twieoma. If5, W w sm 00 09 14: 33 7 /1 0— --- DAVE- 66hk C .. CrA C..—I;.. A— A.a,.s LOCATIDIV MAP all 0:40 Ilk k SEmON L 7-wp z7 pm 23 PIP, Fig c 34 P, 93 7 A, 6 to iwh a'.P)Iic S-10 fed. --- ------------ - 04,92 IINA, 'V.Aw'.l 1/1 r Ik' gdA,.d %I.F Sebg Twp 17'f4f Z3 01 USURMA94 7A, ..Al:..N4 Nk' %J/4, S.S. 1h 7-V?Z7A-4'F ZJ 9 645' A, W. ll.kf' AMP/. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen VACATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BLACKHAWK GLEN IST ADDITION C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and ,Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition --In response to a request received from the developer of the proposed Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the Council scheduled a public hearing to consider the vacation of certain portions .of an existing drainage and ponding easement to allow the development of residential roperty as a part of the 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page is a copy of the easements proposed to be vacated. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected parties with no objections received to date. The •Engineering Division has evaluated this request and determined that there would be no adverse impact to required storm water storage requirements. U ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the drainage easement. as described for Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition. �7 BLACKHAWK GLEN ®ST ADDITION EASEMENT SKETCH. �xwrxar>rxrxnw rrK nrw ar,ttn � 4 r^v N 89.37?9'W 2230.68 ` ianm arnnr x[w>rlr vw wu� " ;. 1 . •`s `- �°r. rr .us.aro nora ar eurJx... xnas srr°xo .°o•nanr ,ro,J ' � j:L,•o TZ�°.,.,ri--r—:–.•,�;�, Hyl Sy (oT �e ;,i 7.} w �� � to � urzxrxr rcaoxxn rrmf 7 ,Jro�, ��-\(/ tr P` 9 �`i ourLor �nr�;. =j"A.- ufwrxrL` , !r �b�• ::mt �y]-af: ,�•��' i xx me wa neje. r °'w,P• so min •.r•nn � >—nn.aufr runitxr I\ .b - N O u T L O T n.• iw Jmmox � � +� � �,•� 0 10 q0 .e . ourLor ' [T J .` � ' , , x "`k'. • C I i Y � � i - :.°- a —� i ,se. A .. N75.43.01 -E unmWni�3•la}/ - er•J�YK �'- !rv',_� 54900599:° �µii36 °"p^°" w 'rrye°xb9 F..,�.... +.y .��, //� Y �x•Tn..— �(� rzmxo w. �"ro ' �""w 2 ` (y,\ 8.1219 aaa rsitc'p ay ,I 8 +� / —moi Imo•a°°,.f.• N �l �� ,� I ,: , ,; ; � _— L� 1 n �,:'jl �, l• 3 :++/ L J \ \ \ ^nom _ ♦ 9 4� ag IL sa 1g4gv 7. DENOTES AREA OF EASEMENT TO BE V/ a4 VACATED AND NOT COVERED BY ;a• ...1 :...\\;9•�\Y; EASEMENT AFTER PLATTING. 1) 6"2 s is % sejj�w 62 rE•'fjf/ � � ���t _ 7 1 o:y 117 Y.\ \ as c°°••\ � _.. __ ri9L,5 6 /\ if 8 /�_so_� x"a _.b✓,!'^'v� 1 ppy"• 1050. <— w �s.r•fio: fdeJx\J R asrfBugr .nr .'K 3;86w'0� inc m .D.J..,• �( .1l 1.52o+�sica`° 1r�"°oe�aJo `°oar .o .+fid j/�3 �'s. - � J,t•(t�_i• ao —..nor\ \':°'-: �•Y 64 1 O` "irt ox \"'.f e e "t'n q' / eo• °•1 ;s •t,' /r B�rF r \,. O'1i.Y r fe•� Ff�orqma wt.v�� alo Z. '3. ? /, °rY{� � > 117 •., "py +\� t / .�1 p♦ /� • O.5(c rri _ �` \ /s • / CI :1lro Is.. •\ \=`.• n,r. `•. :x'°•ia.m.nr— \�'': m. :.'u':...'....e're P.�.//,�eee/r fY� _ .•ora m _�t (-� a_ - _•= �' —�\`:. • d.- I _ . ICj, ..°t '1O y •' ,/ • . +4/�M1 L`I Ix I'.'wr. =,m� ' A-L'.r26', > •6.,..,,/...z 7f..lY'.1 i. i_ ,i !. i� i. n rx, i/\9':'`v \`r '/� '• ' r. . \-•'•tej v,i.�:SY:3 �n.m.a r�fi'1E:R. �I la 3J rcr81 y 16427 ;I Ig 2P Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen PROJECT 450, WILLIAMS & LARUE ADDITION - SANITARY SEWER D. Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer --On December 3, 1985, a public hearing was held to discuss the installation of sanitary sewer laterals to service the Williams and LaRue 1st and proposed 2nd Additions. As a result of that public hearing, wherein a preliminary assessment roll was prepared based on estimated cost, Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of plans and subsequent advertisement for bids. As a, result of the bid opening held on June 27, it was determined 40 that the cost to construct the sanitary sewer lateral, services and related restoration exceeded the estimate discussed at the public hearing-. In accordance with Council. policy, consideration of the award of the contract was continued until the affected property owners could be informed of the projected increased assessments and provided an opportunity to reevaluate the needs for the proposed improvement. Enclosed on page '!�D is a copy of a letter sent out by our consultant engineer informing the people of this projected cost overrun and scheduling a meeting to be held on Thursday, July Lo, to explain the information in further detail with final Council consideration on July 15. It is anticipated that the major discussion of the presentation of this item would pertain to the estimated cost and proposed alternates, rather than the entire project concept. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 450, Williams and LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer. 11 U SPECIAL NOTE The letter from the Consulting Engineer to residents informing them of the cost overrun was not available for distribution with Friday's packet. It will be included with Additional Informa- tion on Monday, July 14. so Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen PROJECT 473, PILOT KNOB ROAD - TRUNK STORM SEWER E. Public Hearing for Projcet 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer --With the proposed improvement and upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to south of Cliff Road, additional trunk storm sewer facilities will be required to handle the runoff generated from this improvement,. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing beir}g scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. • There are three distinct separate areas where trunk storm sewer will be installed or existing lateral storm sewer revised. With many property owners already being assessed for trunk area storm sewer, no additional assessments would be proposed except for those who have not previously paid their trunk area storm sewer assessment. However, if they were proposed to be affected by either the necessary acquisition of construction easements or inconveniencedby construction activity, the letter enclosed on page 61 was sent out also notifying them of this public hearing. A so, all notices were published in the legal newspaper -.- ... and sent to those property owners proposed to be assessed, inform- ing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer will provide detailed information pertaining to these proposed improvements and will be available to answer questions and concerns from the Council and public. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer, and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. REPORT .m PIL®T ISN®R ROAD ® (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY MALL) r, TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT N®. 473 EAGAN, MINNES®TA FILE No. 49380 /1 Baned.4waf 2odeae, f4ada-idda 9 AdociaACA, 9aa St /dors/, Mtn«eeota ' — Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 2, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Pilot Knob Road (Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park, City Hall) Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 473 Our File No. 49380 Dear Mayor and Council: Ort. G. B.nnlroo. P.E. Ruben W. Rosen Y.E. Jcoryh C. Andr hk, P.E. bra✓/ rd A. Lrn,be,,, P.E. Richard E. Turn". P.E. J.mek C. Olson. P.E. ORnn R. Cook. P.E Aeilh A. G.rdon. P.E. Th.,. E. Noyn, P.E. Rlrhurd W. Fal", P.E. Rohrer G, Sch.ruhl, P.E. Marvin L.-Surrulu, P.E. Donald C. B.,,n,dl, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Murk A. H"uon, P.E. Ted X. Pidd, P.E. Michael T. Nuwmonn. P.E. Ruben R. Y/e/Jrrlr, Jl L'. Dund O. LwAalu. P.E. Thumal W. Pnrrsun. Y.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. K1Bh. P.E. Jams R. Muland; P.E. A'ennelh P. Anderson, PE. Kroh A. Bachmann, P.E. Murk R. Rol/+. P.E. Ruben C R.uek. A.I.A. Thmnua E. AnMur. P.E. .Aur, L. Y.un,. P.E Churls A. Leo Aeon Leo M. P.wh ky Harlan M. Oh.n Sums M. Eberhn Transmitted herewith is our report for Pilot Knob Road Trunk Storm Sewer Im- provements, Project No. 473. This report coveres trunk storm sewer and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00 RO ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. _AG�L_'__ Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of t=SteMinnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: June 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by lYepartment of Public Works Date: 4 - V -dc 6 5456d �3 30 Year Anniversary i 1 LJ SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer im- provements which are required at this time due to the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Cliff Road in 1987. The trunk storm sewer im- provements are located in 3 different areas along Pilot Knob Road and are in- cluded within or adjacent to Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park and City Hall. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and only slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The revision proposes that the NWL for Pond BP -15 southwest of Evergreen Park be lowered 6.4 ft. to 892.6 as compared to 899.0 as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This revision to the Master Plan is recommended for two reasons: 1. The low point of Sequoia Lane in Evergreen Park Addition can then be drained southwesterly into Pond BP -15 thus providing additional capacity within the existing 27" RCP located east of Pilot Knob Road through which this area presently drains. Based on design standards utilized today the existing 27" RCP is approximately 30% under design capacity for a 5 year storm based on its present drainage area. Therefore, redirecting the low point of Sequoia ® Lane to Pond BP -15 will provide additional capacity for the future storm sewer required in Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the con- struction of this line will provide better street drainage at the intersections of Sequoia Lane and Walfrid Street and Sequoia Lane and Lodgepole Drive where additional catch basins are proposed. Also redirecting this drainage area to Pond BP -15 will allow it to flow by gravity to the Minnesota River rather than through the Carlson Lake lift station where it would have to be pumped to Thomas Lake resulting in additional long term energy costs. Page 1. 5456d :J�x 2. The existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive presently discharges into Pond BP -16. However, the controlled elevation of Pond BP -16 is approximately 3' higher than the existing storm sewer in Lodge - pole Drive. Therefore, by constructing the outlet for Pond BP -15 at a lower elevation and through the existing storm sewer from Lodgepole Drive, this storm sewer can ultimately be drained dry, resulting in less maintenance in the future. In addition, the de- sired normal water elevation of Pond BP -16 can be preserved as previously intended. L J It is recommended the project proposed herein be constructed as part of one contract. DISCUSSION: The project for discussion purposes is separated into 3 different areas. Evergreen Park: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing storm sewer within Evergreen Park Addition from the low point in Sequoia Drive southerly along Sequoia Drive and then westerly along Lodgepole Drive to Pond BP -15. It is also proposed to provide additional catch basins in the intersections of Sequoia Drive within Walfrid Street and Lodgepole Drive as shown on the at- tached drawing. In addition, it is proposed to construct a 12" diameter grav- ity storm sewer outlet from Pond BP -15 to an existing 21" RCP, which serves as the outlet for Pond BP -16 and conveys runoff from the Thomas Lake Elementary School site. The connection to the existing 21" RCP storm sewer will be at a location to provide sufficient grade and capacity to serve as the outlet for Pond BP -15. The 12" diameter storm sewer will also connect to the existing 27" RCP from Lodgepole Drive which presently discharges into Pond BP -16. This connection will allow the existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive to drain dry Page 2. 5456d 6�5' and also preserve the existing water elevation of Pond BP -16. Design consid- eration for Pond BP -15 are as follows: Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro- Comp. Proposal Comp, Proposed Plan posed Plan posed Plan Storage Plan Out -Outflow NWL NWL NWL HWL Storage (Ac.Ft.) flow cfs (cfs) Berry Patch Pond BP -15 899.0 892.6 901.6 894.7 3.0 2.4 1.0 0.5 Berry Patch Park: Storm sewer proposed for Berry Patch Park provides for con- structing a 12" diameter gravity storm sewer outlet from Mooney Lake (Pond JP -7) to Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9. Both Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -9 are included within Patrick Eagan Park. Pond JP -7 is abutted by residential homes to the south and east included in Hilltop Estates while to the north and west it is abutted by large unplatted parcels. However, the unplatted parcels • west of Pond JP -7 which also abut Pilot Knob Road are presently proposed to be developed. Therefore, as part of their development plans, they will also be required to interconnect Pond JP -36 to Pond JP -35 and Pond JP -35 to Pond JP -7. Pond JP -36 which abuts Pilot Knob Road will receive additional runoff as part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive. The lateral storm sewer proposed in Pilot Knob Road will be extended northerly and south- erly from Pond JP -36 and ultimately discharge to Pond JP -36. Therefore, due to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the proposed development of the unplatted • parcels west of Pond JP -7 and the current high water elevation flooding park property and trailways, it is necessary to provide an outlet for Pond JP -7 at this time. Design considerations for Pond JP -7 are as follows: Comp. Plan Existing 5 Proposed Elevation NWL Pond JP -7 862.8 859.4 Comp, Plan Comp. Plan & Proposed S Proposed Proposed HVL Storage Outflow 865.2 47.6 ac.ft. 1.0 City Hall: Storm sewer proposed at Eagan City Hall includes constructing a storm sewer from the northwesterly corner of Pond JP -6 within an existing open Page 3. 5456d rA ]w+� :-�F �. .., _-. 1 -,--co :,,xa fr .. .iT.: yrx. �e R.,.I'> -.; s.av v i• .; z�se-n"' :�=2+?J A.?i�`7�i 's.''`-� ditch towards City Hall as shown on the attached drawing. Presently, runoff from Pilot Knob Road and a portion of the parking lot at City Hall is conveyed through this open ditch to Pond JP -6. However, those portions of the ditch which are at a steep grade are beginning to suffer severe erosion. Therefore, due to the additional runoff being directed towards this ditch resulting from the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary to construct storm sewer in those portions of the ditch which are susceptible to erosion. However, be- cause of the uncertainty of how the property south of .City Hall will develop, it is proposed to preserve the open ditch where it is constructed at flatter grade and erosion is less a concern. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for construction of the storm sewer for • Hilltop Park and Evergreen Park. Storm sewer for City Hall is constructed on property owned by the City. Therefore, no easements are required. Parcel Description - - - -- EVERGREEN PARK . .... . ..... .._ Thomas Lake School Addition Lot 1, Block 1 Thomas Lake Lot 7, Block 1 Lot 8, Block 1 BERRY PATCH PARK Hilltop Estates Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Lot 3, Block 1 SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 5456d " Permanent Temporary Easement Easement 0.18 acre 0.37 acre 0.06 acre 0.13 acre 0.07 acre 0.13 acre Page 4. 6, 0.04 acre 0.03 acre 0.03 acre 0.06 acre 0.05 acre 0.16 acre 0.11 acre 0.11 acre 0.22 acre 0.18 acre AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 010-51 Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-53 Parcel 012-54 ® Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 ® SE 1/4.6 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-26 City of Eagan Parcel 013-26 City of Eagan SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan HILLTOP ESTATES Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 1 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-85 City of Eagan Parcel 010-82 City of Eagan NE 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan THOMAS LAKE SCHOOL ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDN. Lot 7, 8, Block 1 EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 6 28, Blk. 1 Lots 3, 4 & 5, Block 4 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 S 22, Blk. 5 Lots 1 (012), 2, 7, 8 6 9, Block 6 Page 5. 5456d I COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is listed below: Evergreen Park $162,020 Hilltop Park 68,250 City Hall 39,810 $270,080 The total estimated project cost is $270,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess- ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef- fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as- sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of • this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. Page 6. 5456d 6y TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Large Lot $0.50/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft. of ea. ac.) Regional Park $0.025/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance is Trunk Storm Sewer $270,080 Trunk Area Assessments $214,402 TOTAL $270,080 $214,402 -$55,678 It is anticipated -$55,678 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund. It should be noted, however, that $92,355 of revenue is related to the proposed assessment to Patrick Eagan Park and Berry Patch Park which is con- ._.. ... ..-. .. - .... ...... _.------ sidered the City of Eagan. 2 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Acquire Easements Approve Plans and Specifications Receive Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes Page 7. 5456d Wo June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 Summer, 1986 August, 1986 Sept., 1986 Sept., 1986 Spring, 1986 Summer, 1987 May, 1988 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 473 A. EVERGREEN PARK 600 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. $ 21,600 250 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 8,000 250 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,000 1,380 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 33,120 11 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 12,100 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 4,800 1 Each 27" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 600 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 2 Each Connect RCP to existing RCP @$ $600.00/each 1,200 30 Lin.ft. Water main relocation @ $20.00/lin.ft. 600 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 15,000 550 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @ $5.00/ton 2,750 60 Lin.ft. Concrete curb and gutter @ $12.00/lin.ft. 720 6,000 Sq.yds. Boulevard sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 9,000 0.5 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 400 5456d Total $118,690 +5% Contingencies 5,940 $124,630 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 37,390 TOTAL EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION ..................... $162,020 Page 8. 41 B. BERRY PATCH PARK (Pond JP -7 to Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9) 1,350 Lin. ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in p1. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 37,800 2 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/lin.ft. 2,200 4 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/cstg. @ $500.00/each 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. 4,000 16 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 1,600 3.0 Acres Seeding @ $800.00/acre 2,400 RCP Flared end w/trash Total 800 $ 50,000 +5% Contingencies 2,500 $ 52,500 ® +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest 15,750 TOTAL HILLTOP PARK ................................ $ 68,250 C. CITY HALL 150 Lin. ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 4,200 150 Lin.f[. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 3,900 540 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 12,960 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 3,300 ® 1 Each 24" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 1 Each 21" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $700.00/each 700 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 600 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 900 2.0 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 1,600 Total $ 29,160 +5Y. Contingencies 1,460 $ 30,620 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 9,190 TOTAL CITY HALL ................................... $ 39,810 Page 9. 5456d 47/ APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, HILLTOP PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROSECT NO. 473 Parcel Assessable Area Description (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) SW 1/4, SECTION 22 0.05/s.f. Parcel 014-50 183,990 Parcel 010-51 42,790 Parcel 020-51 217,800 Parcel 040-51 163,360 Parcel 050-51 217,800 Parcel 060-51 161,500 Parcel 010-52 621,335 Parcel 010-53 217,800 Parcel 012-54 110,100 Parcel 014-54 202,620 "'Parcel '015=54""''"' 209,570 Parcel 016-54 209,570 Parcel 010-00 336,000 (Berry Patch Park) SE 1/4. SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 Credit Assessable 331,060 Total (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment 0.05/s.f. Large Lot 75,750 $0.05/s.f. $ 3,788 Large Lot 16,500 0.05/s.f. 825 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Large Lot 49,500 0.05/s.f. 2,475 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Pond (152,750) 8,750 0.05/s.f. 438 Pond ( 40,100) 581,235 0.05/s.f. 29,062 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 --- 110,100 0.05/s.f. 5,505 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Large Lot 66,000 -0.05/s.f. 3,300__ Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Pond (236,000) 100,000 0.05/s.f. 5,000 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 $0.05/s.f. $ 16,552 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 0.05/s.f. 16,552 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 449,380 Future R/W (202) 359,500 0.05/s.f. 17,975 TOTAL........................................ $122,047 SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,340 3,494,200 Regional Park Page 10. 5456d W $0.025 $ 87,355 PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARCEL NO. SE 1/4, SECTION 22 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 010~79 Parcel OlO~Ul Parcel 010~82 Parcel 010-83 Parcel 012-85 5456d Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012`04 PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA �s BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date:JUNE, 1986 Comm. 49380 FIG. No. I S 0 500 GmDnitScole in Feet ® * = CITY OF EAGAN POND J -9 NWL= 816.7 HWL=83 .0 PROPOSED 12° DID -82 STORM SEWER 010-83■ 011-85, NWL= 819.2 HWL=830.0 012-85w PROPOSED 12° 011-86 STORM SEWER /—Ex. STORM SEWER 016-54 I� W 2 015-54 1 3 Q 4 I I \\ � 014-54 D /BERRY \\� O 1 040-51 PATCH 3 1 % PARK ft ///)I POND JP -7 060-51 010-00* W I NWL=859.4 / LAJ (MOONEY j HWL=865.2 LAKE) 050-51 010-51 FUTURE STORM SEWER 020-51 ! 010-53 014-50 FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) 11 (Co. Rd. No. 31) ILI or ' y1 t I ® POND JP -35 010-52 , POND JP -36 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK h ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE. 1986 FIG. N0. 2 Comm. 49380 010-84 d Z C 012-66 0 U PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (HILLTOP PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA WESCOTI ROAD 4 -------------------- 1 EXISTING STORM SEWER CITY HALL ffi EXISTING PAVEMENT 0 °• p 014-26 ° * EXISTING OPEN DITCH U v FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) PROPOSED STORM SEWER N 0CITY OF EAGAN N 013-26 CITY OF EAGAN Z 012-26 PONS Y i8•. NWL= 818.9 HWL= 830.0 F-24. o® ° J °gpg11C SCALE IN FEET �l a ROCKY WAY 3 I 2 SKOVDALE No. PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (CITY HALL) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 67 � E] 5 BONES ROOT , ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul=No Minn. Date:dUNE, 1986 Comm. 49380 LEXINGTON AVE PATRICK EAGAN PARK x o' Sao r�- L.Ph [ I..W N Fw • CITY V LKAN LEXINGTON WAYI I (Co. Rd. No. 31) —11 ®r n� PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN. MINNESOTA Xe BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date:JUNE, 768 Comm. 49380 FIG. No. q 11 IIAI 2oFeagan 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mures PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Courcy Memiwm THOMAS HEDGES July 3, 1986 city AtlMM Olw EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City cieh Re: Project 473, Pilot Knob Road Upgrading/Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements — Evergreen Park & Berry Patch Park Dear Property Owner: This letter is to inform you that on July 15 at 7:00 P.M., a public hearing will be held at the Eagan City Hall to discuss the proposed project providing for storm sewer construction, installation and modifications necessary to handle storm water runoff associated with the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road in 1987. While the City does not propose assessing you for any costs associated with this project, the Council would like to hear any of your comments -..----or concerns 'since you are located within the proposed construction area and may be affected by temporary construction easements and/ or inconvenienced by construction activity. Enclosed you will find a sketch plan showing the concept plan of construction that will be discussed at this public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the proposed alignments, location, scheduling, etc., please try to have a representative attend the meeting of July 15, ,1986 when all these items will be discussed in detail. Sincerely, Public Works Department TAC/dk Enclosures q THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES F. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the June 17 City Council meeting, specific direction was given to the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses that are issued in other communities that do not restrict the number of off -sale liquor licenses issued. The City Clerk's office was asked to prepare a response to the City Council direction For a copy of the directive and response, refer to pages_ through • Also enclosed on pages 7-4 throughare letters from two (2) residents addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding their position on changing the off -sale liquor license ordinance. There are two (2) alternatives being given consideration by the City Council for the regulation of off -sale liquor licenses. The first alternative is to limit the number of of'f-sale liquor licenses at five (5) and further that those licenses would be issued at the discretion of the City Council within established geographic boundary guidelines. The number of off -sale liquor licenses could only be changed in the future by ordinance amendment. The second alternative is to eliminate the number of off -sale liquor licenses within the City. If this alternate is given consideration, the City Council has discretion to attach certain regulatory guidelines. The City Council could adopt one or several of the following guidelines: 1) specific geographic • boundaries, 2) each community shopping center and/or sub -regional center will be allowed on off -sale liquor license, 3) a distance factor such as one-half or one mile between off -sale liquor store establishments, 4) so many licenses per population (our current population is approximately 35,500). With five (5) licenses, the ratio is one (1) license per 7,O00 people. 5) a per license ratio based on household units (our current number of household units is 12,500. The current ratio based on five licenses is one license per 2,500 households. Mr. Dave Perrier asked that research he has compiled be submitted fo- review by the City Council. Enclosed on pages f% through ilrLis a copy of Mr. Perrier's information. �7— ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To 1) amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance by removing the limit of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted in the City and, further, consider certain regulations if the cap is lifted, or 2) decide to not amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance and keep the off -sale liquor license number at five (5). '76 MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE VANOVERBEKE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE. JUNE 29, 1986 SUBJECT: OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE STUDY At the June 17 City Council meeting, any further consideration to remove the ceiling or cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses available for issuance was continued until the July 15 City Council meeting. The purpose for continuing this item was to allow the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses if the caps are removed. Please arrange to have a study compiled that would address the following issues: ® 1. What are the restrictions enforced in other cities if there is no cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that are issued? 2. Are there control factors such as distance from schools or churches? 3. Provide any demographic information that might be helpful for the review of off -sale liquor licenses. Information was recently compiled by Federal Land Company that might be helpful as you prepare this study. In addition to the aforementioned questions, I would like you to ask for copies of city ordinances and review with city clerks the limit of control - enforced by a city council if caps are removed on the number of off -sale liquor licenses. 0 r. $ City AdministratoV TLH/kf 71 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBERE FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT DATE:JULY 7, 1986 SUBJ:OFF SALE: LIQUOR LICENSES Staff has reviewed off -sale liquor licensing practices in other metro area communities, the state licensing law and demographic information pertinent to off -sale licensing. Findings of that review are as follows: , I. Restrictions in other cities. A.Eight suburban communities which have not set number limits on off -sale licenses were contacted. 1. Bloomington (81,831 pop. (1980) has 25 active licenses and sets no restrictions other than zoning. The liquor stores must be located in commercial areas. The City Clerknoted that many liquor stores are located on Lyndale Ave. and that several of these had been in business for many years. 2. Burnsville (35,674) has eight active licenses. Their City Code states that the liquor store must be in a free standing building and cannot be located within one mile of one another. 3. Golden Valley (22,775) has had eight active licenses for several years. The City does not allow an off -sale business in an on -sale - - operation, but it is okay to locate in a strip shopping mall. - 4. Inver Grove Heights( 17,171) has seven off -sale establishments and there are no specific requirements. There are several stores along Concord.Street, some directly across from one another, that have been co -existing for years. 5. Maple Grove (20,525) has four active off -sale liquor stores, all operating in shopping mall locations. There have been no complaints about the system as it currently operates, but Maple Grove does plan to review their entire liquor ordinance in the near future. (Maple Grove's population is now 30,000, which closely patterns Eagan's growth.) 6. Plymouth (31,615) has eleven licenses which the clerk felt was a reasonable number for the approximately 40,000 residents.(1986 est.) The only restriction is there be no liquor store within 300' of any school, church or residential zone. 7. St. Louis Park (42,931) has nine licenses with no restrictions on locations other than zoning. The council may caution against lo- cating near another liquor store as not being prudent, but there is no law against doing so. 8. Shoreview (17,300) has four licenses. The population has since increased to 22,000 but there have been no requests for additional licenses. B. The people responsible for licensing in the eight communities generally agreed that_the market essentially sets the number of licenses. These_ cities have had few requests beyond the number of licenses already active. It is within the Council's perogative to request that the applicant undertake a market .study in order, to gauge the proposed liquor store's chances for success. II. Control factors. State statute MS340.413 does not allow a liquor store within 300' of a school or a church. There are no state restrictions regarding the number of licenses per population as is the case with on -sale licenses. ® III. Demographics A. Zones where off -sale liquor is allowed is shown on the attached map. Off -sale is a permitted use in retail shopping centers of Neighborhood Business (NB), Community Shopping Center (CSC) and . Regional Shopping Center (RSC) districts. It is a conditional use in a General Business (GB) District. There are P.O.D.s with underlying zoning which allow off -sale liquor. Actual development is not in keeping with the underlying zoning de- - - -- -- --creasing the possibility that a retail shopping center will be constructed. B.The revised Geographic Boundaries for off -sale licenses which were approved July 16, 1985, are also shown. The Council approved_ two licenses in the southwest area, one in.the southeast and one in the • north. The Council approved an additional license for the north central area on May 6, 1986. C.Approved sites for off -sale liquor stores are indicated by stars. �3 ►a Geographic boundaries approved • i July 2, 1986 Holly Sperr 4448 Johnny Cake Ridge Rd..., Eagan, MN 55122 Mayor Bea Blomquist Members of the City Council City of Eagan, Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and Council Members: ® I would like to go on record as changing of the off -sale liquor City of Eagan. being strongly opposed to the licensing ordinances within the I do not want the City of Eagan to look like, for instance, Lyndale Avenue in Bloomington where there is off -sale liquor establishment upon off -sale liquor establishment. For this governing body to say they will regulate,even with unlimited numbers available for purchase,is opening up the City for lawsuits should there be denial of the license request. - - -I was employed by the City of St. Paul Licensing Division for 7 years. I speak from experience when I relate the following. To stipulate in this proposed ordinance the restrictions such as churches, schools, residential areas, etc., is not sufficient, you are "opening up a can of worms". Lawsuits will cost money to us taxpayers. Zoning laws can be changed and that will serve as a potential problem. . My main concern with this ordinance, again speaking from experience, is that you will -be cutting the throats of the small business people that currently hold these licenses. It is a very�'difficult business to be in and by adopting this proposed ordinance you are going to make in almost impossible for the small business person to operate in our City. Please do not do that - they have cared enough to open up establishments and to run them as best they can and do not need chain liquor stores that can afford to run them out of business and then make their profit. Our City should care about the small business person and not do this to them - or to us, the taxpayers. Sincerely, Holly perr Please submit this letter as part of the record at the Council Meeting/Hearing to be held on July 16, 1986. Thank you. 7!� Easter Lutheran Church James P. Borgschatz, Pastor Thomas H. Johnson, Pastor July 1, 1986 City Council of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Council Members: 4200 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 (612)452-5200 I recently read about the discussions concerning liquor licenses in Eagan. I oppose the "free market" approach to granting liquor licenses because it is not responsible and will predictably lead to instability in the community with stores starting and then going out of business. It will also lead to greater financial pressures on the smaller stores which will -result in the greater access of liquor to minors. I am not opposed to liquor stores. And I agree that the current system is cumbersome and time-consuming as Mr. Smith indicated. I urge the Council to adopt an ordinance plan for the number of liquor stores that is tied to the population (perhaps to numbers of households) To reduce the unfair aspects of the "free market" approach, a minimum distance between stores could also be pursued. Several persons in this congregation have similarly expressed their views. Government need not abandon responsibility and good planning in order to satisfy the principles of the "free market." Government is also charged with the responsibility of seeking the "greatest good for the greatest number." And thank you for your many hours of public service in making Eagan not just a good place to live, but an exceptionally good place to live. Sincerely, James P. Borgschatz s� JPB/kkp 74 E 1 U • Highlighted in yellow is a supplement to Federal Land's "Off Sale License Information" that they have submitted. Please note there are restrictions to many of these City's liquor policies that have not been included in this information. Such as distance restriction between stores like Burnsville, Arden Hills, Minneapolis. Also, population regulations in some cities such as Cottage Grove, St. Paul and Minneapolis. There are some cities who have both of these restrictions, like Minneapolis. We • for the omitted how'many have also filled in the column ':'No. of Persons Per License" Municipal stores. This information should not have been because the stores are city owned. This still tells us stores are serving a particular area -for comparison. In calling and talking with many of these "No Limit" communities, many of the City's employees have stated that eventhough their policy reads "No Limit", every potential license must go in front or the City Council for an approval or disapproval, "becoming a timely and costly procedure!' Addressing concerns regarding "Constitutional Rights of the ._... _ Free Enterprise System", The liquor Industry cannot be compared to other retail stores. This industry has many more controls and restrictions placed on them by the Federal, State and Local Governments. No other retail business in taxed as high (8.57) an now a proposed hike of 7% by the end of the year, no other industry • is required to pay all there distributors in 30 days or be shutdown from any wholesaler being able to sell to them. No other business carries the added responsbility to the community not to,.sell to teenagers and intoxicated individuals that drive our streets. We do need a policy in Eagan, but not one that opens up the industry for anyone to come in and sell. The communities that have this policy put it in force many years ago when the industry had little regulations and there was not nearly the emphasis on liquor control. We need a policy with a one—mile minimum distance requirement and also based on population. This would allow the City to expand the number of off—sale liquor stores in the community as the population grows, while insuring a controlled liquor environment. Dave and Pat Perrier I OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION C� CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818. Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt, must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No other stores, schools & churches) Limit 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (Also,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire .16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley .22,775 No Limit 8 2,847 Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 •_ Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 (Council reserve the right to No Limit 2 approve or disapprove, only 2,648 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people P 54 6,86 9( Also,'i mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one 3,323 licenses for the City.has been approved, restriction.) ; No Limit 3 1,108 Oakdale --- =:;:12,123-- No Limit" 3 4,041 Plymouth 31,615 No Limit 11 2,874 Richfield 37,851 Municipal Only ..3- 12,617 Robbinsdale -14,422 Municipal Only 1' 14,422 • St. Louis Pk. ..L- 42,931 No Limit 9 4,770 St. Paul, 270,230. 1/5,000 people 58 4,659 Shoreview .. 17,300 No Limit Stillwater 12,290 No Limit (Citi Council approval necessary) W. St. Pau18,527 8 6 0 1 2,883 0 12,290 8 2,316 Woodbury , ,- . ,,1;10,397 1 , No Limit - 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figures are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED +BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND CITY LISTED ABOVE. COMPANY BY CONTACTING EACH OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818_- Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt, must comply Bloomington with a one 81,831 mile restriction from No other stores, schools & churches) Limit 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (A1so,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire. J6,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley 22,775 No Limit a 2,847 • Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 No Limit 2 2,648 (Council reserve the right to approve or disapprove, only 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people 54 6 , 8 6 9(Also, '2 mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one licenses for the City -has been approved, restriction.) 3,323 No r� Limit 3 1,108 Oakdale 12,123- No Limit 3 4,041 Plymouth 31,615 No Limit 11 2,874 Richfield , 37,851 Municipal Only 3 .12,617 �obbinsdale ....14,422 - Municipal Only .1 14,422 . St. Louis Pk. -, 42,931 No Limit 9 4,770 St. Paul 270,230, 1/5,000 people 58. 4,659 Shoreview 17,300 No Limit 6 2,883 Stillwater 12,290 No Limit 0 1 0 12,290 (City Council W. St. Paul a roval 18,5p2p7 necessary) 8 8 2,316 . Woodbury .. .,;10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council *Population figures Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND COMPANY BY CONTACTING EACH CITY LISTED ABOVE. I OFF SALELIQUORLICENSE INFORMATION C� CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS Robbinsdale 14,422 St. Louis Pk. 42,931 PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818, Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt, must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No Limit other stores, schools & churches) 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (Also, a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire -16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley 22,775 No Limit 8 . 2,847 Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 • Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 (Council reserve the right to No Limit 2 approve or disapprove, only 2,648 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people .54-: 6,869(Also,z mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one 3,323 licenses for the City -has No been approved. restriction.) Limit - 3 1,108 Oakdale ---- -. :.::,12,123 - No Limit" 3 4,041 Plymouth .. 31,615 Richfield 37,851 Robbinsdale 14,422 St. Louis Pk. 42,931 St. Paul 270,230: No Limit Municipal Only Municipal Only No Limit , 1/5,000 people Shoreview 17,300 No Limit Stillwater 12,290 No Limit (Cit Council approval necessary) W. St. Paul 18,527 8 2,874 3 .12,617 14,422 • 9 4,770 58 4,659 6 2,883 0 1 0 12,290 8 2,316 Woodbury _10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figures are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND:COMPANY,BY.CONTACTING EACH CITY LISTED ABOVE. r OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818_. Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 (Bpt,'must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No Limit other stores, schools & churches) 6,869(Also,-."y mile Mendota Heights - Only 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population 3 (A1so,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire -16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley 22,775 No Limit 8 2,847 • Hopkins 15,336 Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 12 8 1,917 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo (Council reserve 5,296 the right No Limit to approve or disapprove, 2 only 2,648 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people 54.: 6,869(Also,-."y mile Mendota Heights - Only one licenses for the City has been approved, restriction.) Newport 3,323 No Limit - 3 1,108 Oakdale -'012,123 -- _ No Limit Plymouth - 31,615 No Limit' Richfield .. 37,851 Municipal Only 4wobbinsdale 14,422 Municipal Only St. Louis Pk. ., 42,931 No Limit St. Paul ....270;230 1/5,000 people Shoreview 17,300 No Limit Stillwater 12,290 No Limit (Cit Council approval W. St. Paul 18,527 necessary) 8 3 4,041 11 2,874 3 12,617 14,422 9 4,770 58 4,659 6 0 8 2,883 0 12,290 2,316 -. Woodbury j ;,10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figures are based on the most current census -figures. STUDY AS PREPARED BY THE STAFF OF FEDERAL LAND COMPANY BY EACH CITY LISTED ABOVE. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986,.City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70 A. Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/ Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986, City Council meeting, authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action continued the license to allow for a public hearing and potential amendment to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm five (5) off -sale liquor licenses or remove the ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted within the community. With the continuation, of the public hearing at the June 17, 1986, meeting, this item was also continued. If action is now taken under Item F., Public Hearings, to remove the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications, this license can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the five (5), then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing the off -sale liquor license maximum from four to five as acted upon by the City Council at the May 6 meeting. Enclosed without page number is a copy of the application and police officer's report that were included with the June 17 packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor license for Curtis 0. Johnson for location at ® the Town Centre/Eagan Shopping Center. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments --A Solid Waste Abatement staff report was completed on April 1, 1986, by Admin- istrative Assistant Hohenstein. A recommendation was included in the report to appoint a Solid Waste Abatement Commission comprised of nine (9) members. The purpose for the Commission is to meet on an ad hoc basis as a factfinding body to explore solid waste abatement alternatives. As stated in the report "its end would be the generation of a recommended solid waste abatement strategy and policy for the City. The make-up of the Commission was proposed as follows: 1) private citizens (3), 2) refuse haulers (2), 3) small business (1), 4) large business (1), 5) local government (1), 6) public service organiza- tion (1). At the direction of the City Council, an article appeared in the May newsletter explaining the purpose of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, the recycling program of the City and also a solicitation to this commission. It was also discussed by the City Council that due to the specialized nature of the Commission, openings would be advertised in the City newsletter as opposed to using, the library of names. Since interest in serving on this commission has been limited to date and recognizing the importance of proceeding with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, it is suggested that the size of the Commission be reduced to five for purposes of appointment. The City Council --could reserve the right to expand the membership if additional - citizen or business representatives are interested in serving in future months. Those persons expressing an interest in serving on the Commission are as follows: 1) Darlene Barr, private citizen, who resides at 2081 Marble Lane, 2) Larry Knutson„ refuse hauler, of Knutson Rubbish ,Service, 3) Tom Mann, small business, who resides at 1231 Carlson Lake Lane and is the owner of the Greenskeepers business, 4) Jon Hohenstein, local government, and 5) additional business representative to be recommended by the Chamber of Commerce prior to the meeting on Tuesday. The City Administrator will be attending Solid Waste Abatement Commission meetings on behalf of the Mayor and City Council All the persons listed above have expressed interest in serving on the Commission and would accept an appointment by the City Council. A copy of a letter from Larry Knutson is enclosed on page Mr. Mann and Ms. Barr have discussed their appoint- ment by to lephone. In summary, it is recommended that the Commission be organized and these appointments be made at the July 15 City Council meeting. The total number of Commission members can either remain at 9 or be reduced to a number between 5 and 9. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider appointments to the Solid Waste Abatement Commission and, secondly, give consideration to readjusting the number of representatives on the Commission. NM fiill( -C 1961 RUBBISH SERVICE M315120 CHIPPENDALE AVE., ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 (612)423-2294 June 3, 1986 ® Mr. Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd P.O. Box 21-199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom, I would like you to know that if the Waste Abatement Management Commission is interested in having a haul- er become a member I would be very interested in that position. I believe it is important to have a representative from our industry on your Commission to help give some in- sight into the unique challenges that we would be facing. S' er lyZ_t LZ�karry son President KNUTSON RUBBISH SERVICE, INC. O Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three PLEDGE AGREEMENT & PROGRAM DOCUMENT FIRST-TIME HOMEBUYERS PROGRAM A. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/NRA First -Time Homebuyers Program --During the fall of 1985, the City of Eagan authorized the Dakota County HRA to undertake a $10,000,000 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. Early in 1986 a request was made by. the HRA to the City of Eagan to pledge revenues from the 1980 single-family mortgage revenue bond program for the purpose of reducing costs associated with the financing and acquisition of single-family homes for each first-time homebuyer. In order to the Dakota County HRA to proceed with the bond sale, a resolution must be adopted that authorizes and directs the execution of an assign- ment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single- family mortgage revenue bond in 1980 in the amount of $300,000 to the 1986 $10;000,000 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. As a part of that action, the City Council is adopting the program document for the 1986 bond sale,. Enclosed in each City Council packet without page number is a copy of the resolution and program document. If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact this office at any time. - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a pledge agreement directing execution of an assignment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single-family mortgage revenue bonds, Series 1980, and authorization of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 1986 Single -Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. RE Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four WAIVER OF PLAT/B.H. GRACE CORPORATION B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation.) Duplex Lot Split --The B. H. Grace Corporation has made application for a waiver of plat to allow lot splits for duplexes located on Vienna Lane. Fo_y a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for the B.H. Grace Corporation for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2„ and Lot 5, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: RONALD EBB (B.H. GRACE CORPORATION) LOCATION: L 1 & 2, BL 2, L 5, BL 3, RAHN RIDGE EXISTING ZONING: R-2, DOUBLE WITHIN MISSION HILLS P.D. (77-1) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 15, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 8, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting waivers of plat for 3 lots in the Rahn Ridge Addition. All 25 duplex lots meet or exceed the 15,000 S.F. per lot and the 100' width. The existing duplexs on lots 1 and 2 of block 2 and lot 5 of block 3 meet code setback.requirements and have separated utilities. All three lots are served by Vienna Lane. If approved, these waivers of plat shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. 1I FAH' 1 � f V. ;I : RAHN RIDGE • U, •7 LANE " , rLs• y •" � - -. r -y - YJ yr - �� � d.l l .] Y�� .lam ._J N.1-"_ 4 s . __ _�� •�Y it -/W ,1- I_ \ ���/(/ �J 4 1100 � • ,' .S •!` 1 L. yj, fR ' ♦ tar _ _ L. . , 1, 11 C •S' • U, •7 LANE " , rLs• y •" � - -. r -y - YJ yr - �� � d.l l .] Y�� .lam ._J N.1-"_ 4 s . •7 LANE " , rLs• y •" � 4' �, 1.. ... r -y - r ar-• -'�- yr - �� 11 :. 1 � ] .a f Y • � .] Y�� .lam ._J N.1-"_ 4 __ _�� •�Y it -/W ,1- I_ \ ���/(/ �J N 0140'3rW 11°0/ 915 C _ SS.03 S3.01 91 I ,,,1 ° 0/i _ S 5 � rt.66 Ma, I E*13Cin9 DO I � { Upp 10 I !S. 34 j u I IS I I I wh ;a5 I 44 &W", CU IIIII1I1 ° 3Tc VIENNR LRNE .34. 931 930.2 `.27.7 929.2 VIENNR LRNE 'L9a ?04 `R 17.cc �L•%a:oe pl N m o v ° -4 0 I L-so.°o -- - s{ 10000 NORTH U VIENNR \ I ,,,1 9)01 0/i _ S 5 � rt.66 Ma, I E*13Cin9 DO Upp 10 I !S. 34 ?04 `R 17.cc �L•%a:oe pl N m o v ° -4 0 I L-so.°o -- - s{ 10000 NORTH U VIENNR 140 143.54 NORTH \ ] t o 9)01 0/i _ S 5 140 143.54 NORTH Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five AMENDMENT/DAKOTA COUNTY BANK PYLON SIGN PERMIT C. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 Square Feet of Additional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign for Dakota County Bank --The City has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank requesting an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center along Cliff Road. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages 0 through�C�, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to the Dakota County State Bank pylon sign for additional ® square footage. a - Era MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM L STURM, PLANNER I DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK SIGNAGE AMENDMENT (LOT 2, BLOCK 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK) Staff has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank for an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center along Cliff Road. t A conditional use permit was approved for this sign on February 25, 1985 and condition 3 stated that the sign shall be no more than 20' in height and shall not exceed 70 square feet in sign area. This reader board pylon sign now has the allowable 70 square feet per side. The additional sign should fit nicely in the remaining open area and no other signage is being requested. Typically, 125 square feet of sign area per side is permitted on pylon signs. The $2.50/S.F. sign fee has been submitted with the application. If approved, this amendment shall include this sign (25 S.F.) only and the 95 S.F./side will not be increased in the future."""" 1. Y� \ ® Pla ner cc: Elmer Borgschatz JLS/jeh 6 T 1 I 3 Exl-sTiNG SIGN 3' X /o" AC -TAC F11 -LEA FRAME CD. BRoazs� r INSTANT eASH SIGN 1 101 111111 /IY.0 /�/�lflll_lL1ltiC1� 8, 3 6 /0! IIN Iy LOBSY..,� -WHITE LETTERS SIGN LAYOUT PROPbSAL BY, ATTRACTA SIGN, INC. 6407 PENN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55423 7-I-86 _SCAL.E. �6 57 1-1 �1-�I--ITT I HlI -LJ5,-ma-. Je.T 6164' �ulr o . v"n�GQ. LS '¢"foiF2 LS v, r INSTANT eASH SIGN HlI -LJ5,-ma-. Je.T 6164' �ulr o . v"n�GQ. LS '¢"foiF2 LS • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986; City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REZONING/OVERHILL FARM IST ADDITION D. Rezoning (Overhill Properties, Inc.) from R-2 (Residential Double,) to R-1 (Residential Single) for Certain Lots in Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 24, 1986, to consider a rezoning application submitted by Mr. David Dehler, Overhill Properties, Inc.-, for a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition from R-2, Residential Double District, to R-1, Residential Single District. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending that the rezoning be granted. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy's enclosed on pages I through45 For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(s)�r�. There is no change in parkland dedication fees proposed for this rezoning. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ,ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for certain lots within Block 2,, Overhill Farm 1st Addition. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MR DAVID DEHLER, OVERHILL PROPERTIES INC LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, 5, IST ADDITION, EXISTING ZONING: R-2 - DOUBLE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 17, 1986 6 & 7, BLOCK 2, OVERHILL FARMS SA, SEC 25 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The application submitted is a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition, from R-2, Residential Double District, to R=1, Residential Single District. ►, COMMENTS. Presently, there are existing duplexes on Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition. Therefore, there has been some development in this block and some continuity should be retained in this area. It appears that .nothing is constructed east of Block 4 through Block 7, of which there is a single-family horde constructed on Lot 7. If a rezoning should occur,_ .possibly..Lots 5 _.through 7 could be 'rezoned to single — family and continue the single-family line to Lot 4. It would then be suggested that Lots 1 through 4 would then remain R-2 or duplex lots, up to where Hay Lake Road intersects with Dodd Road. This would appear to make more continuity and flow within the development versus isolating two duplex lots in this sub- division. The request would be to rezone or a portion of the ,lots as Because of the rezoning requests, attached to this zoning change. DCR/jj 93 all of the lots from R-2 to R-1 suggested by the staff report. there are no specific conditions r/ AUDITOR'S eueu %O..e ,LAKESIDE PARK R p 3 .� r vRLxur xnL SfxNRxj PIPE _ {Iff PRRFI LIRfSlot PAR{ ` ' g Ili Y SWI. l 1 i AUDITOR'S eueu %O..e ,LAKESIDE PARK OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION r I • . , 1 • 1 / • ' 1 jjj \ 1. 1 1 I • D ; f• I � 1 • 1 I I • N �Y L \ • •30 Ae • • Oal AG 0.36 AC. �.• 471 A:'� 1�1 �i ♦\li slft �\ • OT J r � �•. 41 I • . ---- 1COVXTY NATE f1 AID XfI4�N•W P.- .._.•au-.... ...a�. l Cnl1NT`f ✓ ^TL'/_E \ NU •M.(o'v •Ill iJl� r� r, DaAm.4a ..D DxITT uavawn SECTION 15.TV, U2 u l+ a Dl4o"I' 1/C M _ . &WT "T •Ira MOby 964.1 RA AND MAaYJD by al4la TlM AND TIDW W. I07911 U�1V" •1 TNY,Nlsm aAowN. +s N Au Twe err wa ar rNa e MFs er Txa aw V ,are. e•.n N �: y la AaSVMaD TD w.V• . 1 MAIUYi Or 6D-la'90a R SI, yti�Da WTCD IIANT Or 6..J IN P..T i / Ol ACCE"' DaDICATaD TID LD JDI4 44 aTallT CIX!• DAwOTX COUNTY • a• x• M a�1 _ /�� 4L✓ 1 IxCN . nD raaT 9EWCH MARK ELEVATION 955.TT _ TDP NUT of NYDa4NT M TN[ a.W. QU/.DCANT —1- W DOI DD MD LXD CLIr1 4DI.D fl. _ DaAm.4a ..D DxITT uavawn SECTION 15.TV, U2 u Au a..D.14 TNw _ ID7rH K.: as 44 ID r!1♦ IQ MIDTN AND a4D `•.2 i / /' LD JDI4 44 aTallT CIX!• 1•l a Y, 'a F�{` /�� 4L✓ •J rCaT IY WIDTX YID I.D' !014144 LOT LINED U4LeN .•._.. v. •.� •. _) Drwaa.ala. IYD¢AT+D. LOCATION MAP 9EWCH MARK ELEVATION 955.TT _ TDP NUT of NYDa4NT M TN[ a.W. QU/.DCANT —1- W DOI DD MD LXD CLIr1 4DI.D fl. _ APC Minutes June 24, 1986 preliminary plat, a variance from the parking requirements would be necessary. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of Town Centre 100 Second Addition, consisting of Lots 1 and 2, and Outlot A for future commercial development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a maximum. of 1 driveway along Denmark Avenue in line with the previously approved Burger King driveway and a maximum of 2 driveway accesses along. Town Centre Dr. with the appropriate setbacks and separations, and Lot 2, Block 1, be allowed 1 access driveway onto Town Centre Drive with the appropriate separation, 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 4. A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submitted and not released until one year after completion. The landscape plan shall be 40 submitted on an approved grading plan at the time of final plat. 5. The developer shall be responsible for a 6 foot sidewalk along Town Centre Drive. 6. The trash container shall be incorporated into the building for the convenience of the occupants, and aesthetics of the site. AL1 voted yes. Mulrooney moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance for a reduction of 4 parking spaces based on staff recommendations regarding green 'space. All voted yea. OVERHILL PROPERTIES, INC. - REZONING The public hearing was then convened regarding the request of Overhill Properties, Inc. for rezoning from R-2. to R-1 for Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 of Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, in the northeast quadrant of Dodd and Cliff Roads, by Chairman Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the request and indicated the staff's recommendation that two duplex lots remain to the west of the existing duplex lots for continuity and flow. Mr. Dave Dehler appeared indicating that Lot 1 was perhaps too small for a twin home. The Commission discussed the Comprehensive Guide which indicated that the property was designated R -II. Hall moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of Lots 5, 6, and 7 with Lots 1 and 2 remaining as duplex lots, pursuant to staff recommendation, and due to the size of Lot 2 and the triple frontage of Lot 1. Mulrooney and Hall voted in favor; Voracek, Wilkins and Harrison voted against. Wilkins then moved to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7,.Block 2 to R-1 Single Family, Harrison seconded the motion. Harrison, Voracek and Wilkins voted in favor; Hall and Mulrooney voted against. MY C • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company - Mark Baird) ,for an Advertising Sign --A public hearing washeld at the June 24, 19'86, Advisory Planning. Commission meeting to consider an application that was submitted by Indy Outdoor Adver- tising requesting a two- (2) sided pylon sign fronting, on I-4.9'4 in the Eagandale Office Park. The APC is recommending denial. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pagesthrough Also enclosed on page/6 / is a copy of a Tette from Tom Davis representing Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company opposing the proposed sign. The APC minutes are enclosed on page(s) /Q 7� is ACTION TO BE tional use (Mark Baird') the Eagandale • CONSIDERED ON THIS permit for Indy for a two-sided Office Park, 97 ITEM: To approve or Outdoor Advertising pylon sign fronting deny a condi- Sign Company on I-494 in a CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGN) APPLICANT: INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY LOCATION: LOT 14, BLOCK 1, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: L1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPT (JIM STURM) ® APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Indy Outdoor Advertising requesting a two sided pylon sign fronting on I-494 in the Eagandale Office Park. This sign would be located on the Vendmark lot. COMMENTS: Lot 14 is 200' wide and 445' deep. The proposed 40' tall, spot lighted sign will be located 60' from the eastern property line and 20' south of the,. I-494 R.O.W. If this sign were approved, no other pylon signs on Lots 1, 12, 13, 15 and the unplatted 6.47 acre outlot to the east would be permitted due to -the lineal 1,.0001 _.requirement. The signage area would be 10'6" x 36' per side with a total area of 378 S.F. Code allows 250 S.F. (125/side) and a 40' maximum height for hardship reasons when approved by the City Council. ® CONDITIONS: 1. Maximum height shall be determined by the City Council and recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2. _The applicant shall be subject to the one time sign permit fee of $,2:50/S.F. qe . _ L494 -�'�I � F5 .4 i So u ' '--=1': '�{� ti' r� ':�%_�: �i �; :� Vii-.. tri `; p ....0 • h: p ._.'�����..._'._ .i � ens .ted � �'' � •� `.r ♦I _. I -MO -0 Al. Poimr.a RosCw6dwaic. — - a June 24, 1986 The Honorable Chairman and Members, Eagan Planning Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Indy Outdoor Advertising Company Dear Madame Chairman; On your June 24 agenda, you are scheduled to consider conditional use permit for an outdoor advertising sign on property which is surrounded by our Eagandale Industrial Park. Please be advised that we at Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., which own most of the undeveloped land within the Eagandale Industrial Park, are opposed to this proposed sign. We think the unplanned and indiscriminate location of billboard signs along the newly extended I-494 or 35E throughfares of Eagan is poor land use policy. We believe that the city should be encouraging high image, quality developments similar to what we have planned and began to implement along I-494 as opposed to the billboard signs. The ability to attract new businesses, jobs and increased tax base to the community mandates that you not squander away your opportunities to create what is emerging as a very appealing "front door" image for your city. Sincerely, Thomas S. Davis Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. TSD;jo /� 40 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co. for an advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner. Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard ® signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION ® PRELIMINARY PLAT S REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. 4 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight PRELIMINARY PLAT & REVISED SITE PLAN/FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition (Sienna Corporation) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986,.APC meeting to consider a revised preliminary plat for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and contains 68 single-family lots which deviates from the R-1 single -district lot size requirement. The APC is recommending approval of the -revised plan and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report; a copy is. enclosed on pages/Q through >/3 for your review. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to pages _4through ;V6 The original Advisory Parks & ®Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; there- fore, they have no additional recommendations. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the preliminary plat and revised site plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition. /Q_3 • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT - FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION - RODNEY HARDY LOCATION: PART OF THE SA, SEC 25 & PART OF THE NEa OF THE SE;, SEC 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-2, LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT REPORTED BY: JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 18, 1986 PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted to revise the site plan and preliminary plat of the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and will contain 68 single-family lots which deviate from the R-1 Residential Single District lot size requirement. - ZONING & LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R-2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 376 dwelling units per .acre under the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. This agreement was entered into by the owner of the property and the City in -- 1977. ----The Eagan -Land Use -Guide designates this parcel as R -I, --- Single Residential District, with a density of 0-3 dwelling units per acre. Since there is a Planned Development Agreement governing the land, the Development Agreement for Lexington South Planned Development would supersede the density allowed in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: The preliminary plat, Fawn Ridge, was originally presented to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council in late 1983. There was some discussion in regard to lot size and the original plan approved consisted of 93 single-family lots, which deviated from the lot size criteria, 44 twinhome lots, 88 dwelling units for a total of 181 dwelling units. The applicants phased this development into two phases of which the first phase has been constructed and built. The applicants are now looking at the second phase for development. In the second phase, there are 37 duplex lots and approximately 23 smaller single-family lots for a total of 97 dwelling units to be constructed. Since 1983, the applicants have changed their development concept and would like to develop the entire tract of Fawn Ridge into single lots. The revised plat carries the same circulation FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN.'.,.._ JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 pattern, which was approved in 1983, and deviated some of the lot lines to correspond with their new development plan. The net reduction in the second phase of development would be 29 dwelling units. This revised preliminary plat and site plan will now carry the connotation of all single-family lo-cs in the Fawn Ridge Addition. The lot sizes in the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition will exceed the lot size criteria in width and area. Most of the lots in the second addition have a lot width of 75' with a few lots dropping to a width of 70' at the 30' setback line. Therefore, the lots in the second addition exceed lot sizes in the first addition in both area and width. In review of this revised preliminary plat and revised site plan for the Lexington Place Planned Development, the question should be whether this is a better use of the land than what was originally approved in the Fawn Ridge preliminary plat. GRADING/DRAINAGE: Staff has reviewed the preliminary grading plans submitted by this applicant and found it to be feasible. However, staff does have a few recommendations which the applicant should incorporate into his final grading plan. Staff recommends the applicant provide overland emergency drainage ways at all low pointsinthe roadway. This can be accomplished by grading a slight swale down the property lines in the area of the roadway low points. Although the applicant proposes to fill a portion of Pond LP -33, the amount is not significant and will not adversly affect the total amount of storage volume available for Pond LP -33. The net reduction. in high water area amounts to about one-tenth of an acre. This equates to a reduction of about 3.0% of the high water ponding area. In staff's opinion, this is not significant. Besides, the available storage volume for this pond is about 12 acre feet compared with the required storage volume of 8.5 acre feet. This proposed development lies within Major Drainage District L as shown on Figure 1. Based on the applicant's grading plan, - staff estimates about 75% of the drainage flows into Pond LP -33. The remaining drainage flows into Pond LP -65. LP -33 presently has an outlet to Pond LP -61. This pond is experiencing high water problems because it has no positive gravity outlet. However, Council authorized a project on June 17, 1986, providing an outlet to this pond and several other downstream ponds under Project 444R that will eliminate the high water problems. This project is scheduled for completion late this fall. UTILITIES: Staff reviewed the utility layout for this development with the original Fawn Ridge preliminary plat application in 1983. The minor changes and revisions that the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition proposes from the original Fawn Ridge /D5 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 preliminary plat do not result in any changes in the utility layout for this development. It is feasible to provide sanitary sewer and water service to this ,lot by extending the existing utilities from the Fawn Ridge 1st Addition. Staff does recommend, however, that the applicant extend the water main from north Hay Lake Road to Cliff Road. This will allow for future connection to the City's 20" trunk water main along the north side of Cliff Road when it is installed. STREETS: Dodd Road borders this development along the east and Cliff Road borders this development along the south. Dodd Road is designated as a City collector street. It is not currently built to its full 9 -ton 44' wide collector street status. Cliff Road is presently a two lane rural highway under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Staff discussed the ® accesses onto Dodd Road and Cliff Road in the original engineering report in 1983. Staff has no concerns regarding these accesses. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall be required to dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Dodd Road and a 65' half right-of-way for Cliff Road. The developer shall dedicate all easements required by Code. Also, the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over all public utilitiesnot located within public right-of-way. Lastly, the developer shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. ASSESSMENTS: The trunk area related assessments for this development have been levied. However, the future extension of ® the 20" trunk water line along Cliff Road will generate a lateral benefit to this proposed development. Staff recommends having this development assume the lateral benefit at this time rather than waiting until the 20" trunk water main is constructed and this development is built. In accordance with City policy regarding lateral benefit from trunk water main, staff proposes that this development is responsible for one-half its net frontage adjacent Cliff Road or approximately 620'. The 1986 rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main is $11.88 making the total estimated obligation of this development about $7,360. The final amounts will be determined by the final plat distances and the rates in effect at the time of final platting. A,ll other costs resulting from the installation of internal public streets and utilities for this development will be the sole responsibility of this development. 166 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40' half right-of-way and a 65' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Road, respectively. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20' radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water, main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Departmeant of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot 'size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated 5-14-86. 12. The plat shall be subject to the Parc Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. /0 7 E m 9 r— --.•T —�I OVERH:LA. FARM. AOO:T:ON LOCATION MAP GENERAL INFORMATION ORO••R.PIA. S1.11 AE.I. IT .E.•IIR: SOS uRiEu... l ALL DIV NEIGH. ARE En.EREri.0 r.•i.•r•E """' """ "" "" "'• "" -- FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION flooE---- NGINEERING """ """" PRELIMINARY T COMPANY, INC. - --'--- - o.E I •O. IT. SIALLEST LOT SIZE: .� •O. Ir. IVERAoE w. SIZE. M,OO ED Ir - ..o .RE m•.Ecr TO ...... OR Ii..0 .LAI. FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES , C0Np�1 T LEGAL DESCRIPTION i i - � rcun H I U < —J 2ND ADOMON FAWN R:O•GE +T ADD^:GN ze • w0<p � pO NOOIL W \ n rT j IV ILVV CLIFF ROAll r— --.•T —�I OVERH:LA. FARM. AOO:T:ON LOCATION MAP GENERAL INFORMATION ORO••R.PIA. S1.11 AE.I. IT .E.•IIR: SOS uRiEu... l ALL DIV NEIGH. ARE En.EREri.0 r.•i.•r•E """' """ "" "" "'• "" -- FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION flooE---- NGINEERING """ """" PRELIMINARY T COMPANY, INC. - --'--- - o.E I •O. IT. SIALLEST LOT SIZE: .� •O. Ir. IVERAoE w. SIZE. M,OO ED Ir - ..o .RE m•.Ecr TO ...... OR Ii..0 .LAI. FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES , �,- LP -33 i I� .POND DATA r _ r" jlTij:, \ G -_-__- _--- - ------------- ----------------- ------ ---------- -- - ------------------- CLIFF _ ... yPOND DATA _ --_--•---------- ---' - ------- ' ---- ---- -- PAM INIINARV ROAD / ------ - no""'"°' GRADING DRAINAGE AND nxxxw ..v uxo'wxvnu" •"FAWN RIDGE EN GIN EEflING "' •' EROSION CONTROL PLAN ASSOCIATES 2 CDMPNNY• INC. - ,.`3 o4 r41 CKFAG AIPIP, 10/82.0 I?" 35 5/50 0 4L6]%• 1y I]5 ^. III 41.2/ 540 :2 r] 208 20] 91 I' 116-1. ��.'� 53,1/68,0 : 503/6>0 r,-- 1 23�51,4/65.0 184/290 180�6NO GE 5000 BOOSTERHWL. 1059 ri W 24 V- 7 I 12 184 68,)/]40IB5852/950 IBB660/9 0 ]4.4/82.0r DCLE20'•-5ATF>0.8/]6.� 9PgTGIrllx!' 456/580 j 7201L LC hi 12' � z 5].],)20 �/24**'2" '`y*116 66]/850op 42.2/580 )390/545/950I2•121020 2b 1020 251. 203 43.3/580 I / O 984/990__1 4)6/7 — 19] 195 1 -\ )46/6]0 209 9]2/1020��V 1 12 8.196 2 J rIGP 199 47,5/63.0 506/660 93 7/1040 I 1 1 1 112 �i� 1 I64 / 61. 944/ 1000 — s/P 1 1CCLJ irr))8,]/91 0 C EP �' VUrt/ PIW'�PARSUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMF nd WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3 approved -I standard plate ##: - Y"I.ov- 2 J rIGP 199 47,5/63.0 506/660 93 7/1040 I 1 1 1 112 �i� 1 I64 / 61. 944/ 1000 — s/P 1 1CCLJ irr))8,]/91 0 C EP �' VUrt/ PIW'�PARSUBJECT PARCEL city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMF nd WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. *3 approved -I standard plate ##: - eJJ.o J_o(J� tltl49 1/ / J. / 949.1 I i JP -21 °11 90 U BI5.3�ill JP-23J-9�89001 852.2 _ � A: � / 8579 - BI87 I-�""'"- 8J00J -n5`il r` 3 se// \ L/r �N. JP -24 ;� \ 09327'3 9.0 n4fr ��- JP-34'�� J -s JP -25 / B 9.2 ' �'1 L4;.n -I 884,01 JP -53 JP -22 \ 817.0 1 0 P,nN - \`. _ B9/, 9J 1 8640 VVV\ 8000 \\ 8240 830 C1dAl. .I BB09 92620 m1 \ 111L.5.-18 9450 � -1-1--r_c-r--•, J I JP -2.7 JP0-2.6 �r \ .9048290dF 51 x 0 ryy 9760 9-0�0 J-ee -BJP-2.8 99ll `;�...rl JP-52 8JP 68 80853 78. 1 n( JP -50 961. ,0 I Ln 1 r 971.7 8790790 1 -I r I ILP -40 6643 L� 898.0 _ L%�:� 9035 '�1_�i:LP' � CP -61 -2['LP-488913 �8844 LP -69 B9S6-\, ggg5 L5. 24 8878 P 53 'rc r 89Jo z,BB3,6P 52 LP 648 80 ._.I / - LB7926LP 39 9004 lJ( 60 LP 37 BB15 U 9940 r LP -31 "" '2 9006 ,! 8783 9/00LP 70 - BB06 'i LP 33 I 9/00 891,6 . LP 51 17 LP -35 LP 30..78863 1 LP 47, 90/2 65.0 0 le LP -36 9705 879 U::•7:h'y96 LP -49' 1. 9080 LP -30 9 973.5 862pp BBOO BBB:h:•7}}};•; 9124 9/06 908.3 L5.-26 \ 8645 eJ 9190 916.0 •---f- r��� f_" r :� I i5_L _p z7- 910 LP -13 920.4 \C 922.0 Iz' C city of eagan o[\1, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME L LP7 35 B .5 8L B78 0 65 0 .5 120 I z' GOON i'Y LP -21 LP -24 902.5 q, 883.2 1"-''` 9030 886.0 Iz �c LP019 2 1 'LP -IB 90J,0 9086 _ 9107 LP -22 901 0 9040 LP - 213. „/SLP -66 a . 1 LP -68 915 0 LP -20 4 9152 LP 9/73 f\ LP -13 920.4 \C 922.0 Iz' C city of eagan o[\1, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME L LP7 35 B .5 8L B78 0 65 0 .5 120 I z' GOON i'Y LP -21 LP -24 902.5 q, 883.2 1"-''` 9030 886.0 Iz �c LP019 2 1 'LP -IB 90J,0 9086 _ 9107 LP -22 901 0 9040 LP - 213. „/SLP -66 a . 1 LP 28 :: 915 0 LP L 92002 .2 923.6 ` /n/LP-27 9254 I 'l u) . I I H4iDii�RE a LP 23 //' �953 12./ 9253 I SUBJECT PARCEL InCL STORM SEWER • _ /i v MASTER PLAN FIG. +1 approved: standard - plate #: i `LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' �rDNn HILL i..- i, ' 2ND ADOMON I / /�\ �.\\ FAWN RIDGE \ +I, ���—J I L_ �' IST ADDITION LOCATION MAP •j' n I '1 \ v 00~\ f Ob_Rrl:,.l. FARM GENERAL INFORMATION \ pONO —Na— AGo—� T �.• .... _T ^�-1 y\ I `v 1O•� ° `\� r � ADOTONTOTAL au"na+u+xo Tow:No: Ts°-. INOL. ueiLT LOTS: IF uu.. 1. .1 LuefNT LOT + ... ._ 3. J / I 'tr1. fa IT. um Lor ..T.; ..... •o. IF. • _ '.� "T, •r[mf u! 1.•" \ /J'\ STAN..: •.e+uwn•uuf "L°T [° f0. IT. xI= e M • . rr \ • • + w .^ — ` A ^\ \/ V \ ALL SIS.NfN+rw+ALuau rNur. AN. ANS ICT To C"ANIN ON FINAL PLAT.' � I .�• r AAAA `� ,.. +. : � '' ' mu pNI IF lu I 1e1• A If _CLIFF RbAD ------------ J none fTNTLL1iNTApi��p+T o fFAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION N _ .Nf.°f. ENGINEERING ^�•'� �y"_ PRELIMINARY PLAT `�.,.: w FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES COMPANY, INC. �""''' --:. '�:" -- 3 L Seo f.w �... vnn. onnu6 N.xeuer. fnv T..N.•oTc ""10" APC Minutes June 24, 1986 INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co, for an advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ® ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION ® PRELIMINARY PLAT b REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with 'a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. //�' 4 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Roads, respectively_.. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public, utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. _ 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail Is requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING 6 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary plat on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine COMPRI HOTEL G. Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant and Rezoning from GB & LI to Commercial Planned Development and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986,.APC meeting to consider three (3) applications submitted by the Opus Corporation for a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a 6 story, "Compri Hotel." The City staff initiated a comprehensive guide plan amendment as a part of the application process for considering this application_ The APC did recommend approval of ® the four applications as presented. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report, refer to pages / through12 For a copy of the action that was taken by the APC, refer fo those minutes found on pages/7,Lthrough /3a . 0 The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the 1986 rate for the commercial and industrial park land dedication fee and a trailway on Pilot Knob Road. ACTION TO BE 'CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the rezoning from GB & LI to commercial planned development, 2) comprehensive guide plan amendment, 3) preliminary plat approval, and 4) a conditional use permit. 1116 CITY OF RAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION - COMPRI HOTEL LOCATION: LOTS 1,2,3, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE IND. PARR #1 AND OUTLOT A EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS), LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 24 JUNE, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: 13 JUNE, 1986 ® REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: Three separate applications have been submitted by Opus Corporation requesting a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a six story "Compri Hotel". The plat will consist of 2 lots with the second lot a proposed restaurant facility. This 7 acre site will require rezoning from GB (General Business) and L-1 (Light Industrial) to a commercial planned development on -.-lots _1, 2, and 3, Block 1 in the Eagandale. Industrial Park No. 1 and Outlot A in the Eagandale Office Park. The site abuts Pilot Knob Road to the west, Corporate Center Drive on the south and the new 5 story Sperry Corp. Building to the northeast. This Rezoning and Preliminary Plat will require a comprehensive guide plan amendment. COMPRI HOTEL: The proposed 6 story (70' tall) 190 room hotel will be the first hotel along the 494 corridor in Eagan. Compri Hotels contain. only first class guest rooms and amenities are limited. No large scale meeting rooms are proposed and restaurant facilities will be provided for guests only. Since the building is over 3 stories, a Conditional Use Permit will be required. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will also require the hotel to have an interior noise level of 50 decibels or less. An application for a restaurant liquor license will be submitted to the City in the near future. The architectural styling of the hotel will attempt to blend with the Sperry Building that is nearing completion. The brick and glass exterior will be accented by the tinted glass stair tower and canopied entries. The brick trash enclosure on the western side of the building will be accessed by a service drive and employee parking area. Additional plant material along with the existing oaks will screen this portion of the site. 1� 7 COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 2 Access to the hotel will be from a lines up with Corporate Center Drive. in front of the hotel to a canopied the building. PARKING AND STORAGE separated entry drive that This entry drive will loop entrance on the east side of City Code requires one (1) parking stall per dwelling room and one (1) additional space for each eight (8) units. This would require 214 stalls for the hotel alone. Due to the proximity of the airport and that the restaurant facilities within the hotel are private, fewer parking stalls are being proposed. 110 10' X 20' stalls (9' X 20' employee) are shown on the site plan. No pylon signs are proposed. The main signage will be building mounted.on the stair towers. Code requires: 1) That no more than one (1) business sign for each major street frontage shall be permitted on a building for each • business located within such building. 2) All business signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design. 3) No signs or combination of signs mounted upon a building shall cover in excess of 208 of the gross area of side. 4) The signage shall not project more than 10" from the vertical surface of the building. LANDSCAPING: A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and special care will be used to save as many of the existing oaks as the site plan allows. Additional plant material along Corporate Center Drive similar to that in the Eagandale Office Park (Pilot Knob Road and Avalon Ave). All 3:1 slopes and the twin 6' retaining wall areas will need careful landscape plant material selection. The 2:1 slopes will require "ground covers" to stabilize the slopes and to provide for. little or no maintenance. LOT 2: This proposed restaurant facility is not scheduled for construction until the hotel is near completion/or completed. Although the lot will be platted, Opus Corporation will submit site plans to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval prior to the Issuance of the building permit. The Code requires one (1) parking stall for each three (3) seats based on the capacity of the restaurant. 79 10' x 20' stalls are proposed thus enabling an approx. 2'40 seat Class 1 (sit down) restaurant to be built on this lot. The restaurant will have a separate vehicular entry of its own and can share the access to the hotel if so needed. 1/e COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 3 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading proposed on the preliminary grading plan is feasible. It will require two 6 ft. high terraced retaining walls northeasterly of the proposed hotel building. These are required due to the large natural ravine running down the easterly property line of this proposed development. These retaining walls will allow the developer to grade to 3:1 slopes. The 3:1 slopes appear to be the steepest slopes proposed over this development. These slopes are the minimum allowed for maintenance. The natural topography slopes to the north and the proposed grading plan does not change any of that. This development lies within the center of Major Drainage District H, as shown on Figure 1. The developer is proposing some internal storm sewer to collect runoff from the parking lots and directed into a City trunk line located along this development's easterly property line. This line flows into the City's trunk line located adjacent I-494, which eventually ends up into the Minnesota River ® Valley. The 54" trunk line connects with a 27" trunk line from Pilot Knob Road at Pond HP -3 as shown on Figure 1. However, recent study of the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area indicates that the capacity of the 54" pipe cannot be exceeded due to flow restrictions upstream. Therefore, Pond HP -3 does not appear to be necessary. The applicant's engineer is preparing a revision to the Master Plan for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area to handle the storm water runoff by adding additional upstream ponding areas. As a result, staff has no concerns with the encroachment into the ponding area HP -3 as shown on the grading plan. This project will not require any trunk storm sewer improvements on behalf of the City. UTILITIES: According to City record plans, sanitary sewer and water services were extended to Lots 2 and 3 of the Eagandale ® Center Industrial Park. The water service was a 2" diameter line and the sanitary sewer service was a 6" diameter line. Both appear to be at elevations that will suit the proposed building sites. In lieu of this, staff questions the necessity for the separate sanitary sewer line proposed by the developer. Because this line connects to an MWCC collector, the developer will have to obtain the necessary per to connect into this line. Also, because this proposed sanitary sewer connects two lots, it would have to be turned over to the City with an easement dedicated over the line. Staff recommends using the existing sanitary sewer services if possible. The disadvantages of the proposed sanitary sewer line include: 1. MWCC connection permit required. 2. Access for maintenance more difficult than the existing sewer within Corporate Center Drive. This development will not require any extension of any City trunk water or sanitary sewer lines. COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 4 STREETS: Corporate Center Drive and Pilot Knob Road abut the southerly and westerly portions of this proposed development. Pilot Knob Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County with controlled access. Corporate Center Drive is a collector street for the Industrial Park. Neither roadway will require any upgrading as a result of this development with the exception of possible signalization when traffic warrants it. It is presently being discussed as a part of the County Highway 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. The applicant's grading plan shows the primary driveway to this development lining up with Corporate Center Curve which is necessitated by the potential high traffic volume associated with this proposed development. Staff estimates the hotel would generate about 2,000 trips per day based upon full occupancy. The miniumum throat widths for each driveway access shall be 30'. The separation between driveways is 200' which is the minimum separation staff would recommend on a collector street such as Corporate Center Drive. • RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development will not be responsible for dedicating any additional street right-of:way because the City has already obtained the necessary right-of-way through previous platting. - This development shall dedicate a 20' utility easement adjacent the Corporate Center Drive property line. The remaining easements shall be dedicated in accordance with City Code. Staff recommends the developer dedicate a 10' utility easement lying '' -- southwesterly of the easterly property line. --The existing easement is too narrow to reasonably perform any repairs to the sewer line which may be necessary. If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer • shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over the portion of sanitary sewer line designated as a City line. PERMITS: If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer will be responsible for the following -permits: 1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC connection permit. ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments have been levied. /7-'0 COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 5 CON^ITIONS 1) All standard platting, rezoning procedures be adhered to. 2) This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. 3) All signage code requirements be adhered to. 4) The trash area, perimeter parking be screened from public streets. 5) A detailed landscape plan be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plant materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes.. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the installation. 6) The total number of parking stalls be approved as the • site plan demonstrates. 7) A separate liquor license be issued for the hotel's restaurant. 8) Lot 2 be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9) The plat be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10) The main access drive to this site line up with Corporate Center Curve 11) The two accesses into this development be separated by a minimum of 200' and be a minimum of 30' wide. ® 12) A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent the Corporate Center Drive right-of-way. 13) A 10' utility easement be dedicated adjacent the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14) This development will be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. %-kl 4 2 . � • 1 F 1, .n ] ,] k 15 �•� d 2 a: )ALE BUSINESS C MPW 6 T NEIN w7LUNn 21 DIVISION 10 IIPRO 1 .tet n.le n 5 494 MINNESOTA HIGMVAY PUN SYSIECI TO CHANGE. i f J MBc EE mow+ UAE u.nAr.0 4Yk' uHm Ems I� LE MAW urDt - 494 MINNESOTA HIGMVAY PUN SYSIECI TO CHANGE. i f J MBc EE KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS le bme R.mJIgr9. •C .e Br.wn.vu .k 21 E.;uMAum...m 5mm N IN y.yq W Nv 5�p..c ]6 r fail.+wl v+y Ep• 24 i •n �� 4Yk' h - h�h � ae AFF '9 rob L LOIINGTpI BO%B L T.•••1] STANDARD LUMBER .` 'r. • ,e pN'L`,P C PFRB EN ARENSE H'W F 14 ]SCOTT ROADWAY E%PRESS BUILDING CENTER REDOY+U 25, 16 75 "= 12' r1 GCS[ ; 211 IT[Gf� ]] w 22 ECONOMICS I UBORATORY E �.nATnn L u COMPANY CORPORATE THE DONALDSON + , ..... SQUARE COMPANY I U.S. .E POSTAL SERVICE BULKL CENTER r • J r r LSI 9 �[ �? .-� I • .. — . KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS le bme R.mJIgr9. •C .e Br.wn.vu .k 21 E.;uMAum...m 5mm N IN y.yq W Nv 5�p..c ]6 r fail.+wl v+y Ep• 24 I N i SCALE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION M .B.Ir �vMYRL.c.. ae "e 8 "]' 14 NAlUN4 BUILDING CENTER REDOY+U 25, 16 5NYDER 211 I N i SCALE FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION M .B.Ir �vMYRL.c.. 0 I I �1 I' I II I I - I 1 1 EMPLOYE[ POOL (1) 115) 1 P1 FIND � � �_ =1 ', 3l 1 1 EDEI1 I I I ot._. �- 1 n' SERVICE DRIVE • . O ♦ O - \)`,\ 1 6S RANT `♦ as00 BF \ ,':ICE —� --�—--EID7a —�--( --�-- CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE (el Plant Legend SHADE TREES - 2 cal. B SIGN PURPLE ASH. ORC IC LINDEN. MFEF4Y ViGZ O MARSHALL'S ABX, SUGAR MAPLE O FLOWERING TREES - 1 CLI. BB CRABAPPLE, JAPANESE TREEE LILAC, I/ /� YS ♦\` LER YIC ELERRT, AYUR MAPLE / �/ �. '�J�f ��rr�--ii���'}j q CONIFER TREES - 6' At. BB 1 j �' '{ li, / / ` ! I}f` �1" ♦ COLORADO SPRUCE, AUSTRIAN PIN! 2 1 % �,, / i�([Iyy ' y/^� ' ♦`,+ EVERGREEN SHRUBS - 24' dia. Cont. , t.i�. ® JUNIPER. YEW y.,5:4N kJ'\ LAWN � /,' EXISTING TREES I �*-OF. M Ali � I I �, I / 1 / I STI �, URANT♦ CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE /)- HP I MENDOTA 701.8, - IX p ST SrLn O Wali .LL3 I D -. all EY I !/; 2EWXEDI j L__, _ ._ 3p I a rE5 I II ' I C I .. L E P. 4 V / 24• s G: 1.11 C 1 -0 F HP -13 E 8435 a 856.0 f 1,Hi'I!1 1,11 p I I I 24' \ III -DP 17 "D -f '• 8 80.0 - .;881.9 -. I E —� II_E J. P-4 8U7 827 7 LS. -4 842.6.1111.1 87 l i 11/1 CP -3 6 CP -5 850.5 8730 v u IAN I #759 fFr Fp% I4reIIIL Fl - CP -10=S €J [r 19 7900 18020JI I� i •I III . j ;74.8 DP 2 30 D ,J ; .878:/ 11 NP97 IN/!I /. N� HTS. 36 I m 1NDA LEI 'i 1 _ 839 01 6CLN 6 FP 832: J j - \ ., ! 839 r, _ YM[-Fl 7_ \ !6' I D MI +." .812.0 rn•+C.1�E C�,TER / 1 + iE-sEr EILCnE o' 12- 24 iEaD D-: / �E• aOaLE J0-m L.S-30 . E-472 Iz __ I - OP -19 ._ a rE5 I II ' I C I .. L E P. 8 866 66,0 0 ,ia I 1._1 J l/" . DP IS 1,11 p I I I 24' \ III -DP 17 "D -f '• 8 80.0 - .;881.9 -. I E —� II_E J. P-4 8U7 827 7 LS. -4 842.6.1111.1 87 l i 11/1 CP -3 6 CP -5 850.5 8730 v u IAN I #759 fFr Fp% I4reIIIL Fl - CP -10=S €J [r 19 7900 18020JI I� i •I III . j ;74.8 DP 2 30 D ,J ; .878:/ 11 NP97 IN/!I /. N� HTS. 36 I m 1NDA LEI 'i 1 _ 839 01 6CLN 6 FP 832: J j - \ ., ! 839 r, _ YM[-Fl 7_ \ !6' I D MI +." .812.0 rn•+C.1�E C�,TER / 1 + iE-sEr EILCnE o' 12- 24 iEaD D-: / �E• aOaLE J0-m L.S-30 . E-472 Iz __ I - OP -19 ._ 1,AK- 15 884 .05 rte_ 890.0 I II ' C I .. L E P. B 0.0 87/. 7 1._1 J _ I I rr IL r 1OP 13 - p 8;2D II / DP 27 I 8843 / BiB.O DP 6I Q, �IF 857.3 \� " 866.5 1� DP - II 8560 864.4 el DP -5 �� ,s• .� 836.3' �. �EP-3ti- 876.3 R/ V DP -4 � 8855.411 ; 817.2 874,8 L71.-7 1-12 879 B 'l. / 0_4�. ono D -O it II DP -1O 6480 DP\� 1 ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL 4Y -X FIG. +1 city of "eagan STORM SEWER approved: plate #: �- PUBLIC WEPARTMEry MASTER PLAN 7 1 � " sill ..w—•--. ...� .e 1 O' 1 ti•� \\ L_R•1 Driveway relocated& line up-with Corporate ter Dr _ APC Minutes June 24, 1986 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff'Roads, respectively. - 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. • 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. ® 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING S COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus, Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary plat on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, 95 5 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, and southeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive. It was pointed out by Chairman Harrison that the request actually was for four separate applications. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that proof of parking had been agreed upon. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus Corporation in addition to Tom Gaffney of Prism Hotels. An- historical presentation was provided in addition to a description of the proposed Compri Hotel. It was indicated that the proposed six -story hotel would actually be 20 feet lower than the existing Sperry building. The builder's architect was present to describe the plan, including berms and _sound abatement methods. Member Mulrooney indicated that the project and application should be considered as a whole in consideration of its b0ing in the nature of a planned development. Mulrooney then moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, conditional use permit, rezoning,, and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the following conditions where applicable to each of the requests: is 1. All standard platting and rezoning procedures shall be adhered to. 2. This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. 3. All signage code requirements shall be adhered to. 4. The trash area, perimeter parking shall be screened from public -streets. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plan materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the installation. 6. The total number of parking stalls shall be approved as the site plan demonstrates. 7. A separate liquor license shall be issued for the hotel's restaurant. 8. Lot 2 shall be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks b Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10. The main access drive to this site shall line up with Corporate Center Curve. 11. The two accesses into this development shall be separated by a minimum of 200 feet and be a minimum of 30 feet wide. 12. A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the Corporate Centre Drive right-of-way. 0 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single ® family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. ® Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning, to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. 1� Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986„ City Council Meeting Page Thirty PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING FOR CHATTERTON PONDS H. Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19:6 Acres and Rezoning from A to R -1--A public hearing was held at the last regular meeting of the APC to consider two (2) applications submitted by Robert Engstrom for a rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat entitled Chatterton Ponds. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the Plan- ning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pagesL:37Y through /<10 . For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page ( E_ .47L . The recommendations of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission ® are enclosed on page_. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R -L and preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT "CHATTERTON PONDS" APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM LOCATION: SW a, SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: A. AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 10, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING ® APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted re- questing a rezoning from an Agricultural to R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for "Chatterton Ponds". This development consists of 27 new lots and an existing home site on 19.06 acres located immediately south of St. John Neumann Church. ZONING & LAND USE: The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site R-1 (single family). -------Five --zoning --districts- -abutt - this -parcel: - Public Facilities --- (church) to the north, Agricultural west of Pilot Knob Road and to the northeast, Parks to the east, R-3 Townhouse (the "Pines") to the south and R-1 (Hilltop Estates) to the south. The existing home site, the Chatterton residence, is situated on a • knoll where one side falls towards Mooney Lake. This portion of the site is a grassy openland spotted with mature oak. The Chattertons have cows in this area also. Dense understory vegeta- tion, mature trees and ponding areas cover the rest of the site. Most of these trees are hardwood species and special care should be demonstrated to save as many as possible. A rather steep slope (3:1) to Mooney lake will require erosion control attention to assure that the water quality will not be affected. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 20 lots give this project an overall density of 1,47 units per acre, well within the Code requirement of 0 - 3 units/acre. All lots exceed the 12,000 S.F. minimum and range in size from 16,500 S.F. to 42,370 S.F. Variances will be required on lots 17, 18, 21, 22, 25 and 26 to allow less than 50' of frontage at the curb line as required by Code. This will provide access to home sites in areas where roadways are not feasible. /3v CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING: A single -divided access will serve this development from Pilot Knob Road near the center of the western property line. The original location was along the southern portion of the pond and was shifted south after a staff recommendation. By doing so, future development west of Pilot Knob Road could occur with the new streets aligning and without disturbing as much of the wooded area on that side of the road. Proposed Chatterton Road will loop to the east, south of a large ponding area and will then branch off to form two tear drop cul-de-sacs with islands. It is from these cul-de-sacs that the variance to the frontage requirements is necessary. The developer has shown building pad locations for lots 25 and 26 to ensure Code setback requirements are adhered to. This development will have an association for several reasons: 1) to maintain architectural control and unity within the project. • 2) to provide maintenance in "common areas" and in the cul-de-sac islands. 3) to have trash removal on a single, scheduled basis. 4) possibly for snow clearing. COMMENTS: The developer has met with the Parks Department several times to discuss parks issues and dedication requirements. An existing trail on the south side of Mooney Lake will be connected by a 30' pathway easement to the easternmost cul-de-sac. This will provide an uninterrupted pedestrian connection all the way to Patrick Eagan Park once the Mooney Lake elevation is lowered. A similar 30' trail easement from the western cul-de-sac to the undeveloped property to the north will allow pedestrian circulation as well as a potential emergency ingress/egress to the site. A road connection to the north appears unlikely due to the severity • of the slopes. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This proposed development incorporates the majority of the low lying drainage basins receiving surface water runoff from the property east of Pilot Knob Road between Deerwood Drive and Berry Ridge Road. This proposed development incorporates several knolls and side slopes surrounding the three internal drainage basins with the maximum elevation differential of approximately 35' occurring in the extreme northeast corner. All drainage runoff generated from this proposed development will be directed to the internal drainage basins (JP -36 and JP -35) which will be interconnected through a combination of surface drainage swales and underground storm sewer pipe. The ultimate discharge of these drainage basins is into Berry Patch Park and Mooney Lake (JP -7) to the east. With no positive outlet for Mooney Lake currently existing, it has exceeded its proposed future flood elevation and cannot accept anv additional runoff. X33 • CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 However, Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) is proposed to be upgraded during 1987. Part of this upgrading will require the development of these internal drainage basins and the permanent outlet for Mooney Lake towards Patrick Eagan Park to handle the runoff generated from this County road improvement. This storm sewer outlet to handle both Pilot Knob Road and this proposed development will be discussed under Project 473 which will have its public hearing held on July 15, 1986. If this project is approved, downstream storm sewer facilities will be adequate to handle this proposed development. This development will be responsible for all internal storm sewer laterals necessary to handle surface water runoff generated from this development and to intercept the surface water runoff from the Pines development located to the south. The final grading, drainage and utility plan shall show all storm sewer pipes constructed to the edge of existing or controlled water elevations, whichever is lower. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is immediately available adjacent to the south property line near Pilot Knob Road. Internal extensions of a sanitary sewer lateral system will adequately service all proposed lots. However, staff does not concur with the proposed lateral extension along rear lot lines adjacent to the north edge of Pond JP -35 to service Lot 16, 17 and 18 due to limited accessibility for preventative and corrective maintenance, as may be necessary. Each parcel should have its individual sewer service constructed to public right-of-way. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is located along Pilot Knob Road to service this proposed development through an internal lateral extension. ® STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing boundaries and severe topography of property adjacent to all three sides of this proposed development, and the location and configuration of the internal drainage basins, there is no other feasible alternative for development of this property without a -variance to the City's maximum cul-de-sac length ordinance (500'). Development boundary and topographic constraints result in the two cul-de- sacs and one bubble being necessary for reasonable development of this property. The staff has no objections to the proposed internal islands of each cul-de-sac subject to their development._ incorporating maintenance free landscaping. Final detailed design should be subject to staff's review and requirements. Access to Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) will be subject to approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. Its optimal location in relationship to minimizing impact for the McCarthy parcel across the road would result in the entrance being located approximately 300' north of the south boundary line. This 30' shift of the proposed center line will also better comply with the County's intersection spacing guidelines. CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 The proposed center island at the entrance from Pilot Knob Road should be eliminated. Also, although the internal streets are proposed to be publicly dedicated, they do not meet current ordinance requirements for width (26-28 vs. 34). These streets should be brought up to City standards if they are to be publicly dedicated. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: Sufficient drainage and ponding easements should be dedicated for the internal drainage basins adequate to protect the necessary ponding storage volume requirements and interconnecting storm sewer systems. The configuration of these drainage easements will be determined upon submission of final detailed plans for review by the Engineering Division. If the standard street width requirements are maintained, staff is recommending that the public right-of-way dedication be 60' in lieu of the proposed 50' width. 10 The staff concurs with the proposed 30' pathway easements from the terminal cul-de-sac to Mooney Lake with the, final alignment being approved by City staff. Sufficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road shall be dedicated as required by Dakota County to facilitate the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the ._,final plat for all frontage along Pilot Knob Road on either side of the proposed street access point All other internal drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by City ordinance and/or final detail plan submittal and reviewed by City staff. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer and water have been previously assessed on all the land proposed to be developed under this subdivision. Trunk Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed under Project 473, which will have its public hearing on July 15. However, the proposed assessment under this project does not take into consideration the proposed development into single-family lots. Subsequently, significant credits have been calculated under the "large lot" policy which would be voided under this proposed development. Therefore, as a condition of final plat approval, this development shall agree to assume its trunk area storm sewer assessments based on a single family development. Appropriate credit will be given for any related assessment that may be approved under Project 473. /36 CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 5 This development has not paid its related lateral benefit assessments from the existing 27" trunk ,sanitary sewer along the south and west boundary of this plat or the 12" trunk water main along Pilot Knob Road when they were originally installed. Therefore, this development shall accept these postponed assessment obligations'a's a condition of final plat approval based on the rates in affect. These amounts are estimated as follows: Storm Sewer To be determined based on final plat area calculations and ponding credits. Sanitary Sewer ® 580'+300'-150' (corner lot credit) = 730' @ $14.35/FF = $10,475.50 :. (Proj. 88II) Water 1/2 (600') @ $11.88/FF $ 3,564.00 (Proj. 24A) _.......__.__..._With the restricted_ access being dedicated to Pilot Knob Road _ other than the public street access, there will be no assessment associated with the Pilot Knob Road upgrading. Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to discuss these concerns in -further detail with the Planning ® Commission or City Council at the appropriate meetings for formal review and approval. TAC/ jj CHATTERTON PONDS PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60' in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accomodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the • installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. __.........__.___8._.____The ,.Pilot -Knob--Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) be removed prior to buildin� permit.issuance. 11. Park dedication fees & trail issues be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. /37 • • u5 Ai FLCo 4YIN, All r ! Cr[ ll E ION S r lun [On Wp V6pMl-r LA L FIpIY r X L•'b �IIJ� CfFTF � a WIMOCST g PAARK ty� rrtF /122 •.1 _ j u'� GGIM Y. f�F y I�i- ,,J• H;������� © ntire4�:0 /3g"/ \\ , � s WnN+a. ari o�.d,• ~• 6 ��\�9iflis � �•f .�•°`; /�-., � �p ............ h:A / 41.9 .mss•= / 299 639y 11 ', .—i6, 1908>Qh. ' .✓' � . 2. 1 � . 3. Q PON I J9,935._ .uv" _ C 3.50 Wh` - _ � /rJ .{.' , \\. 1,• �....° / llZ) 4. �-)9.40 N � � 4.7 9.11. 1 /us -- - .,t� ��� :I1;( - ♦ - - / e e L. 3 lea n ��'•"'� - - i'4 -9-ee 5-27 l Roh.l Fne1l Bti/; Wl�Elpm _ _ \\ 16131991-1001 1 � r�i i irlar Pla GROSS QIJARE F OTAGE Site. 830,362.5 sq.ft. - 19.06 Acres Total Las: 724,410 Number of Las: 28 Density, 1.47 D.U. per Acre _ • fl CP 12 ;SI' wGP'-1�` I�' .' �� 8930 -- - �I 8296 or. 825.0 1 a 11- j�l / . D d�'.�B976 Er_� 829, ), i -i � DP 22 ' P 11 -66� 6921 ~ 8800871 800 � :w 'J -d I. -i V 1 . \\ ll,li JP_3 .�.JP-67 JP=13 CP- I I I 847.2 .871 0 1 :869 0 795.0 JP 2 8412 c I BBO.O 7 6 , 90 808./ \ III w I'8454.,0he{J 11 ti / Il I r JP 15 .JB492 J' o �0�'1.15/1' ._24.6965 1085/.3 I6 3. HILL5I I\ / `- 1 J c JP -II 8157 8300 926.0 24 . 171...'SBP-1 II JP -51 -- 7903 8010 II JP -5 _ - 823,8 834,0 ;�H04K 27 P4HM. 1 I BP -2 J-ee i 792.3 / 1.0 111` HO/.O BP -29 I�BOO 8097 °d 1100/ j/. ria 6 1 \ a/B.b � BP 33..'e 9 BP -28 8626 1 1 s 895.2- e660 49 ` Q'_ !Y J ._ R -B - BP -3 36 �1 /B 889. 9 903.2 / 99 // B P-35 _____1 8-c 908.0 /.I: 920.2�1 Jp- 2'.-._._ BP -25 N- BP -4 r 872 Cal=. 8 4 844.0 CI r! 1 r nalL I j 5n0 r 3. 61P 8189 8300 JP W 11-F Y 81 83 P-36--,-- ---C/ 970,6 JP -3 1 5 9142, 869.4 859 4 .ICH 872.4 6652 /'I �w 924.0 1 874.2 SP -2\ s'I 9272 BB6.5 882,1 B-sj!2O cl 886.0 �- -e w I ___8P-24' -:N I Bp-,5- 9180 P=S 9180 874 5 923 % \ ' I 886,5 I J \ B -d s 16 ;,BP -17 I I �P �J ,/ �+ -. -892.0 1 N LP- .5 931 33l/ 4 I 1 840.5 9323 vI h BP -B I �. � 8500. sB 27 BP- 1 IE11i.;E- -i. L6.-2 U .. .'4 BP -I6 --�- l..w 8989 `�-; rullalr 90// 955.0 858.0 DP -11 d r Hk ee99412 _.2 D N. rz 'DP -25 'II(.rt ion 0-886.4 it VI?CC '892.0. _ ��� JP -45 5 JP -62 It 6913 893.0 8955 �, JP 44 ' 8907 48957 =\4 J_p I Jf r J 9 _.:... A n a -f JP -30 8730 879,4 Jzi r ; a�. _. J 23 30.0� -tl U FA Vic O, U F -RM LP -93 \I 8511 853 B Ll L d I'. 6 ] b -_ Ib L.4 LP 54 888.0., Ji ................ ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL uJP-29 926.0 9450 JP -51 -- 9760 J-ee I�BOO JP -2B ria 6 JeI _969.4 .I �= !Y J �1 99 1898 (6 'N.L9UT �� FIG. #1 city of eagan STORMS WER approved: plate #tl PUBLIC _ � WORKS DEPARTMEN MASTER PLAN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 r' 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • preliminary plat and rezoning to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. A(/ 7 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (.TP -7) has been ordered by Council action. B. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. It was also recommended that the staff plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. All voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the ® request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of McCoombs, Knutson was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. �% //`7-Y 8 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1'' FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 11, 1986 RE: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIONS REGARDING CHATTERTON POND At the Commission meeting on July 10, 1986, the Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. Commission members had made an on-site visit to the site to review and investigate the topography of the area, to determine if the trail connection between the proposed plat, and Berry Ridge Park to the east could be made. After their reviewal and discussion, the Commission made the following recommendations: 1. That a cash dedication requirement be required for all lots. 2. Trailway on Pilot Knob Road be the responsibility of this development. 3. That a five foot bituminous path be developed connecting the easterly most cul-de-sac to the east boundary of the plat, connectable to the trailway in Berry Ridge Park. --------4. -That the developer bench in a trail bed two feet above the normal pond elevation, and provide a trail easement through proposed lot 24 to that portion of Berry Patch Park now inaccessible. Should you have any questions regarding the Commission's recommendations, please feel free to contact me. KV/bls i40 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty-one PRELIMINARY PLAT/TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE I. Preliminary Plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by New Horizon Homes for a 60 unit townhouse project located on approximately 14 acres and described as Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights. The APC is recommending. approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages-49-6 • through /5/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to page s) 1,e The original Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; therefore, there are no additional recommendations. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny preliminary plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake., /W U SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: CITY OF EAGAN PRELIMINARY PLAT, 'THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE' NEW HORIZON HOMES OUTLOT C, THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS, NW 1/4,.SEC.,28 R-3 IN THE BLACKHAWK P.D. JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 6, 1986 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. ZONING AND LAND USE: Outlot C is surrounded by the recently approved Deerfield Apartments to the north, Thomas Lake Heights quads to the east, the Highline Trail to the south and an un- developed R-4 district to the west. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as a mixture of Parks (P) and Mixed Residential (R-2) with a density of 3-6 units/acre. The site has steep slopes and drains primarily into a pond on the southern portion of the site ani off-site to the east. SITE PLANNING: Clemson Drive will be continued west for approxi- mately 200 feet and then proceed north forming Beacon Hill Court. All of the quadraminium buildingsl exceed the 30 foot front yard setback and have more than the 30 feet between buildings which -.-..was required. -in .. the . Thomas Lake freplat. in .1983.. .Clemson Drive continues west to the property line where a temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed until development in the R-4 district occurs. The Williams Brothers Pipeline easement extends 40 feet into this plat along the eastern property line. There are no setback problems. ® Each quad unit will be served by two private entry drives most of which are 14' wide. Code requires 1 indoor parking space and one outdoor space for each unit. This is provided ,with the parking area in front of each garage. COMMENTS: This development will have an association to control trash pickup and maintain the common areas. The architectural styling/color of the buildings will be the same as that in the Thomas Lake Heights Addition. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and should need little or no revisions. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: This development incorporates a section of land with considerable variations in topography and elevation with the maximum differential of approximately 40' in the center of the plat. Approximately the northern two-thirds of this development will direct its surface drainage to the northeast into the drainage basin within the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition which is ultimately connected through a series of storm sewers to the system within Thomas Lake Road. The lower third of this development will direct its surface water runoff to the THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE „ JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 south into the Highline Trail drainage basin Pond BP -6. This southerly drainage basin currently receives runoff from the Mallard Park and Woodgate Additions and does not have an outlet presently available. A future outlet would be provided through the installation of a storm sewer lift station and force main discharging into Thomas Lake Road. However, at the present time, this drainage basin is able to handle all current drainage and anticipated future runoff from this lower third portion of the proposed Trails of Thomas Lake Addition without requiring the installation of this outlet. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing topography and property line constraints, it is not feasible to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac to the north. This cul-de-sac will require a variance due to its length exceeding the maximum 500' allowed by City Code. Clemson Drive is proposed to be a continuation from the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition eventually connecting to Johnny Cake Ridge Road through the future development of the Wilmus property to the west. The center line of Clemson Drive is shown • approximately 625' north of the south line to allow its extension to Johnny Cake Ridge Road to conform to the proposed future parkland dedication associated with the development of the Wilmus property. This stub street portion of Clemson Drive will have to have a full right-of-way and cul-de-sac constructed until such time that the adjacent properties develop to allow its continuation. The staff supports the proposed configuration of the cul-de-sac street and Clemson Drive intersection which will help to provide continuity but yet discourage through -traffic due ---to the turning movement -.required. Staff recommends that the name "Beacon Hill Court" be changed to avoid confusion with the Beacon Hill Subdivision located south of Cliff Road. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been stubbed to the east property line of this proposed subdivision to be extended upon a future development such as this. Althought the western boundary represents the major drainage district divide for sanitary sewer, it is recommended that the sanitary sewer lateral be extended to the west property line to provide maximum flexibility for future development of the unplatted property and park land to the west. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is availabe to handle this proposed development with the lateral extension through this property. With the development of the Thomas Lake Heights Addition, a water main stub has been provided in the northeast corner to be picked up by this proposed development through the cul-de-sac for proper looping and fire protection which is not shown on the preliminary utility plans submitted. The water lateral should be stubbed to the west property line to provide for future extension and continuity of the water system. Other details associated with the installation of sanitary, storm sewer and water main must meet the current City engineering standards at the time of final plan review and approval as a part of the final plat process. / THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The drainage and ponding easement of sufficient size and storage volume shall be dedicated over the southern portion of this plat necessary to meet the requirements of the Master Storm Sewer Plan for drainage basin BP -6. The final alignment and configuration of this easement will be defined at the time of final plat approval. All other internal utility line easements will be defined after final engineering review of utility plans and shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. All other public right-of-way dedication meets the City Ordinance and engineering requirements for this type of subdivision. However, additional right-of-way or roadway easement will have to be conveyed to the City to accomodate the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac at the western end of Clemson Drive. • ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed under Projects #88, 237 and 256, respectively. No new additional assessments are required as a condition of final plat approval. However, all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision and its future extension to the west boundary line will be the entire responsibility of this subdivision. - -Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to -- discuss any aspect of this report during the review process before the Planning Commission and/or City Council. `/' 7 THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de- sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance must be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. S. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be • dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff - subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". -9. This "plat—shalr-be sutr3ect-to-all:-standard plat conditions. ---' - 7 0 0 x N w�.M. 6.nn (.I— On fill UP -61 - _ DEVELOOYIFNT SUMMARY 7REUMINPRY LANDSCAPE/GF?SE CE`/aopr' soN �sson.*es.lxe TNF- TRAILS OF THOMAS LAk 0 Ul J 1w 1 1 NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. "q PLANT -jCHEOULE On fill UP -61 - _ DEVELOOYIFNT SUMMARY 7REUMINPRY LANDSCAPE/GF?SE CE`/aopr' soN �sson.*es.lxe TNF- TRAILS OF THOMAS LAk 0 Ul J 1w 1 1 NEW HORIZON HOMES, INC. "q C I ry ;1 Ai '-�AK HALL 27- P 3i K N 7 80316 11 1 14 A -k 807 6 2.3 r'A d �54' NO"; � 8 AP - BP -29 VIPAI;E 797 3 K j 097 600 6 0- 8/80 -ccc a A P 8189 856 6 3P 8663 .9300 en -o'3 2 36 3-b SK -A. JP-36f��— US IR 4;`QvE G'� 8706'JP-35 jp- 873 Z -Ik - 1 8694 :8 5, j. L37F-'mc, 36 12 "P�1872.4 i F,7 EIP-35 9052 JP -4 L'Al 908,0 -37 72 87,40,=pj2"., A'P 9202 J P 00 7 8 A- PTO 8P-4 875, pE r 86 6 3 BP -25 874 2 924 0 BP2 886 88�' I I ; LP -6 88 AP -35 8006 B-4� 8665 t A 4 3 A 711 3-k -SP-24 BP. 5 _7! 45 AP -51 921 Z' 6865 4 87 A P -7 0 1 1 � . I L 889.2 B -a 1. ;. . :I o- 89 894T3, ��a 85 89J.9 'J/AP-�8 39 00 N / 9 -42 I -m fT LP 840.5 BP. 18 0 931 3 9323 3829 LIF 24 2 d j AP- 12 91 9"o 9 196 E 89� 3 S--27 9P B 88 C BP -1 M 8960 1 9/0,! 8736 8820 8 1 'P t A 2? P-43 'P 0 t 7 1048 B!, 5,,,o 12' Is' L AP -26 3-e 5 8 BP -11 BP 883 5 L. S.-3 BP -20 LP -5 8866 2 9 6990 .-897( 9160 9 NA 900.4 01 AP'23 T:�j F 9200 889 3 -'r-K BP -13 7� wil r AP -49 j �00 0 H. .921 4 i; 881 7 PIAP-40 -: 9270 J 27'ap.8 I3P-X .915 0 3-K :T'� 6890 '2. AP -11, i 912A .15 92 0 8. A905,2 9' 00 7j '6 -21 6"9060 �P 5 91H if t 1� 'Ma -, 01 1 AP -50 88 --L ; EIP 7' F 88 b 9M� I I 886,0 9 8, 1 26.0 8940 8950 '5 �9040 . A dd7—, 7.4 BP -I 16 12 21- <bBP-31 90810. Z. �j l� 0 - -15 9 14�0 0 A V 9 I AI 9 7.6 BP -34 9082 �-14 BP -32. 988.0 914.0 912 1 lk 9 a 10060 933.9 T E DR. ' �Iq AP -44 193 937.6 jr LP -5 1 7 t r 3T 915.9 L,S -211--'� 9180 911.0 . I � i' I I One., A 9 0 - 13.� , " 4 PARK% AP 2, GOL Is 0 t COUR V P-48 '."i 6 AP -16 -21A LP- I 204 I 4GOITAON AGII�T, r 920,15 b L S,-20 020 1 89 9Z3.5 �AP L 8 926,0 -15 ; I 1 9340) IS 088 1 AP /5.0 K 926.2, 5 91 L 925 LP -56 93Z )D 9R 3 ................ Q BJECT PARCEL u ................ ................ ................ ............... /071 FIG. +1 / a a Is e., -P m a- -s city of eagan pproved-: standard - STORM SEWER plate PUBLIC WORKS MEN] 2 DEPART MASTER PLAN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. 8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building - permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. It was also recommended that the staff plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. -- A11'voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. - --- THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of McCoombs, Knutson was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed- utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. /6Z 8 d APC Minutes June 24, 1986 l 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or . Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. • All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project.. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of ® Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. F: 1 J: \1Y- 40 Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. Secretary - APC 0 111614 E Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/PARK FOREST APARTMENTS J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres and Rezoning from A (Agricultural to R-4 (Multiple) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986 APC meeting, to consider a rezoning application from A to R-4 and a preliminary plat for a 420 unit apartment complex as submitted by Earl Jespersen. The APC is recommending denial of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering reports found on pages /::� through AZ/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to page( 16 -5 - The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash dedication and trailway on Federal Drive. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON 'THIS STEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-4 and the preliminary plat for Park Forest Apartments as presented. lye/ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: DESIGN COLLECTIVE (EARL JESPERSEN) PARK FOREST APARTMENTS LOCATION: S.E. 1/4, SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: A (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 11, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by The Design Collective requesting a rezoning of a 32 acre A (Agricultural) parcel to R-4 (Multiple) and a preliminary plat for 420 Apartment units. This site is located west of Federal Drive and 35E in the SE 1/4 of Section 16. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as R-1 (Single Family) and R-2 (Mixed Residential). Therefore, an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be required. ------ ZONING -AND -LAND USE: -- -This - development is - surrounded by ---agri- cultural (A) land to the north, 35E to the east, Blackhawk Glen (R-1) to the west and the northernmost portion of the Blackhawk Planned Development. This P.D. has both R-3 and R-4 districts bordering the .proposed apartment project. An undeveloped portion of the Blackhawk Hills single family development is to the immediate ® southwest of the site. The topography is rolling with knolls and depressions. Existing vegetation consisting primarily, of elm, cottonwood and popler is scattered, often found in the depressed areas. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 420 units give the project an overall density of 13.13 units/acre. Code requires that the minimum setback shall be increased by 1 foot for each foot of height over 35 feet. The building on the NW is shown approximately 30 feet from the Pacific Avenue R.O.W. where a 50 foot setback along a public street is required. Building sections and elevations have not been submitted but staff was told that these buildings would be similar in scale to the Lemay Lake Apartments. Therefore, this building would need to be moved to the south to meet code compliance. This may also be the case on the northeastern most building that is 50 feet from the property line. All other setbacks meet code requirements. The 420 units will require 420 indoor parking stalls included with the rent in order to provide the 420 10, x 20' outdoor spaces being proposed. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING/LANDSCAPING: The six dwelling buildings are serviced by two main divided entries from Federal Drive on the east and south and by a single access from Pacific Avenue on the north. The drives converge to the center of the site (south of the pond) where the 3,000 S.F. clubhouse is situated. Amenities located in this area include a spa for 10 people, 2 outdoor raquetball courts and 2 tennis courts. The Parks and Recreation Department will require a trailway along Federal Drive for the entire length of the project along with a cash dedication fee. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted by an out of state architect that will need to be strongly upgraded to meet City standards. On multifamily projects, one - tree per unit is the minimum standard. This would allow for performance standards enabling the City to require a more dense screening from roads, parking areas, trash enclosures and especially different adjacent land uses. Building heights and landscape plans submitted on proposed grading plans are necessary to provide adequate buffering. Existing trees should be carefully located in an effort to save as many as possible. The detailed plan required for final plat approval should be done by a landscape architect familiar with native species. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the developer submitted for this development is feasible. The applicant does, however;, propose on filling some of Pond JP -2 .which ° is located at-.-- ---- the north end of this proposed project as shown on Figure 1. This pond is designated as a future City detention pond in the Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The developer has shown on the preliminary grading plan that he can provide the necessary ponding area by reshaping the pond somewhat. Before the City can approve the final plat for this development, 40 the City must authorize the. project to construct the outflow pipe from Pond JP -2. The City installed a portion of this pipe under 35-E during its construction. The portion west of Federal Drive to Pond JP -2 and the portion east of 35-E to Pond JP -3 remain to be constructed. UTILITIES: City Project 432 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer through the middle of this development to provide service to the Royal Oaks Addition immediately north of this proposed development. The sewer is deep enough and of adequate size and capacity to provide service to this development. A 30" trunk water main will be brought to the northwest corner of this proposed development. This water ,main is being constructed under City Project 451. The contractor will complete this work this summer. /6�6 PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 With this development, staff recommends extending this 30" trunk water main to Federal Drive. From there it can easily be put across the freeway because the City had the casing pipe installed with the Interstate construction. This line can then tie into an existing 30" line within Duckwood Drive, west of Pilot Knob Road. Figure 2 shows how the completion of this water main fits with the City's Comprehensive Trunk Water Main Plan. Staff recommends the Council not approve the final plat for this development until the Council authorizes the installation of the 30" trunk water main. Also according to the City's Master Plan, the 8" water line proposed within this development should be- brought to the southwest corner of this development to connect to an existing 8" line servicing the Blackhawk Hills Additions. This, along with a 30" line, will complete the City's trunk water system west of 35- E in this area. ® STREETS: Federal Drive borders this proposed development along the east with Blackhawk Road bordering this development along the south. Pacific Avenue will be brought to the northwest corner of this development with the platting of the Hampton Heights Addition. Both Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road are built to their ultimate design sections. Staff has no problems with the two access points proposed. Both appear to have adequate sight distance. The developer proposes -- -- on extending Pacific Avenue about 500' east. The extension of Pacific Avenue will require a 30' easement from the property to the north.- Because this street is proposed to temporarily deadend, the City will require the construction of a temporary turn -around. In the future, this street could connect to Violet Lane. ® This development is responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk along Federal Drive, its west property line. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The only right-of-way necessary for this development to dedicate is a 30' half right-of-way for Pacific Avenue. MnDOT acquired the right-of-way for Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road with its I -35E right-of-way acquisition. It may be necessary for this development to dedicate an additional 5' of right-of-way for the sidewalk along Federal Drive. At this writing, staff has not been able to determine the right-of-way for Federal Drive becuase it was included with the I -35E right-of-way acquisition. The City will require the dedication of a ponding easement over Pond JP -2 encompassing the 852 high water elevation. The City will also require a 20' utility easement over the storm sewer outflow line from Pond JP -2 and a 20' utility easement over the 8" and 30" water main. /5� PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 Also, as a condition of final plat approval, this development will be required to obtain the necessary street easements for Pacific Avenue and its turn -around from the property to the north. PERMITS: This development will require permits from the Minnesota Department of Health for water main extension. Also, a sanitary sewer extension permit from MPGA will be required. ASSESSMENTS: In researching the City's assessment records, staff found that this development is responsible for trunk water area assessment and upgrading the trunk area storm sewer assessment from single family to multifamily because of the proposed R-4 use. This development will also be responsible for the lateral benefit from trunk water main assessment resulting from the 30" trunk water main construction as shown on Figure 3. The following table summarizes these assessment obligations of this development. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd 1986 Description Quantity Rate Amount Trunk Area Water 27.2 $1,190/Ac. $32,370 Trunk Storm Sewer Upgrade 1,186,140 (1) 0.014/sq.ft. (2) 16, Lateral Benefit 618 11.88/f.f. 7,340 from Trunk Water — (1) Net area total. (2) Multi -family - single family rate. All costs for the installation of all, internal utilities, except possibly for trunk storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility of this development. ��0 PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: 1. This development shall provide the amount of storage volume for Pond JP -2 as required by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. 2. Final plat approval cannot occur until Council authorizes the installation of the trunk storm sewer line outlet, the 30" trunk water main, and the B" trunk water main loop to Federal Drive, unless the applicant wishes to install any portion of these utilities under private contract. 3. The development shall dedicate a 30' right -o£ -way for Pacific Avenue and be responsible for obtaining the northerly 30' and turn -around easement for Pacific Avenue. 4. This development shall be responsible for obtaining Minnesota Department of Health, MnDOT and MPCA permits. ® 5. Staff shall approve any phasing plans. 6. This development shall be responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk, and a 5' right-of-way if necessary, along Federal Drive to the west edge of this plat. 7. A detailed landscape plan submitted on a grading plan with the final plat submission. A bond shall be submitted and not released until one year after the installation. 8. All standard plat conditions be adhered to. 15f 0 C L2 e �. FGVD JP-2 ••war. �\ rv.v.... «....«� I[��p. \ I�I\\ —_/� / T 3 °` _� _ ,r•� _ Ig iS � _ FlR9f il101 E1Lv �.Is l�� j - '// Z ..FlR]T AGG<F1.EV •COO �'/ / �,�i \' [ f� .' /^_ � / �I RTw BLACKF-IAWK RTMENTS -3 _ .._ ;,:.. COLLECTIVE I /Cp-10 P,01,0 I , eIDGE /,V :;: , J 0 COMSER 765.0 P-2 801? 0 8748 874-8 Auc C-h- j / CP 7 23.5 7 9.7 ENl Ic "EWHT�Lr . . .......... Dpo�.. ADD 2 F' CP CIP SW5 8 8296 6 C'- I 1 25 0 17.06 1 EC A-b CP Pj r 196, 806.0 871�O -892. AP - 27 . A C -- 7963 --17 8800 1-7802.4 CE%-U, ci:n c. JP-3 -.p� Tj 4r%/'r6. 24 -67 844.0 IL 1 187010 F -bb CP-II 9 7f. 95.0 0 y 630 8472 8 0 6 1117W j 8492 AP 65t 3 16, FIS:i . .84 3 �I;ITIPO;300 4 - 8398 L1- 8025 T:- T : 15 T 4, P 4b J cP 8440 AP-5 -.,8L 846.5 790.3 .11 1- P N:, 01.0 I 24P• 5 834.0 CITY ?r 11.ACKHA-VK PARK Kf� P,$7 27" HALL 036 ... !1 07 3P-2 7 JP-10 r. A-1 8 8208 SP-29uL ry 830,0 '1 444T �!Ell J-1 809 7 818.0 AP- 2 .) tI,L' ) I ;II I .O� JP 6 P'6 U66,36 I , , . 13, 8P-28 8189 i�j �:. . �i . - 8 !JP-49 BP 33 86668' .01 i I , 30 S -.IiLIE I 1 818. 8860 48- 8-1b i7 H95.2' --36P "\7 018, 8706 JP- 79 4 830,0 a5 -6694 ap-32r.872,4 Is', Ij 889 9 86.52 -35 905,2 - 90810Bc JP4 Jrs�P-8 PA q.?0 2 j 37 7,40 819.S P 8 .0. 830. 1.8.90.6 SP-25 A P Al /,J�- - U ( '875 87 P-4 74.2 924,0 5 8 9272 6 3: 1 AP-)35 LP 88( 6 8555 00 kJ�i: 6 �2 c s -AZA,IE>l B - k P. II --AP-511 77 1- B P - 24 f. BP:5 I ... \P-7 1 .1H'. gU I gl I-,,A T, 8 9A, 38 4.� r 8 6.5 846 LP-43 I II/A10.0 R,-, 85J.. -L. , - ; 851 1 EIP-17 853.8 1 '88987.1 L - P 42 R.0 ;q ;,-840.5 z 8SO,O mP tl ?2 orp . mL Itj - v 937.3 3i90a8820 BP 16 1R�LS- 27 l I '.BP I 'i III I T j ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ ................ roges+ FIG. #1 city of eagan approved: standard STORM SEWER plate #: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MASTER PLAN s FI li: I I / 27. 7/540 �� I' ]90/ ••A �AOM EIEIA 82020 16. 6•IB i_ 3BIMS Nyl0 2.0aW5 4� .1 45B/ 12 � "... . r.. L. 950 I`:iL 1 16• s9.o 45 ?5 ✓64 MAvj / NS b!'al Rx/ 192 43 O:5 Al. 0, 40 40 993/1170ELEVATED STORAGE q / \ 640/ -10 jN.w L. 1059 t 14,,I' 3 E All �7I- 57flI[IF71, 9• X72 // INpUm' i24PN �/ --II—_ 8• 7] 69.3/840 J 551/];.0 I J� 10• r ra / v L I� �� 6" Eoz I" I; �I 71 d�ig///ISO .r. 'Iz' 0� /Zn 8]68A060� 6J 9/80.0-.I '� i MIDGE �.j - 16• JjJ•xx // I GI 2)930 5].9/]30 463/620 4 4/6711 �' 19 / 62 12" 79 16.i B• '20• '76 . _20• 75 79 04 ' ! 20.•x •:.�r -r � - / Go 7/ a69B8 ]/ '• �� // 61.0 950 80 1060 )8 TREATMENTI 68.8/840 PLANT [r_ II I.T 0 i / ' LI: II U24Gp7 O ll GH 6 SITE /% )0 J/ / �O ISI 1 .,. II 291 'r • 0.' 710/890 91 915.1/92.0 !,!G f (5TL 2ND ,,;/ 16! r 56.2/6]. l - - O. �. 63 —� 950 90 li 30I T ----I 1 �= -RIAL alil, IS. 864/ 92 69.5/e{0 84 600'® 6 ®1050 1U __T _ 55]/)00 603/]HLOi NNOD I t \ /740 Bn 6 12 93 60.4/78.0 � 1_68118310/ 0� 103 I� 24" �IIf, IDGEVIE;W Ll 1. •� 4�� �j^��w�' % / ; 30 566/42CENT ENTE``OB 969/614 1 .Q°65.0/650 r, 11 C: 16 1+. Lit TV_')847/980 •••.•:'• � i L 87 104'u-�B�nO�!45' �Au •• U_FE 91 75 107 p L "y IS. 9 Lr5fi 0i ° a'1�i.' II ' -.•i\ i }f:;}:{ 6 r P 595 ,' LS I 11,1 86 73.3/74.0 950 lLLTO f FISH ACNH, 7/N - ... G� I - L- L n 1E—�_1 595/ AP593/ 6 +I J 1 � 1 9 / /•� ��1 ]s o 76 0 I MILL$ ' 122 I T' -- 16 - 1 - i_1 69.7/ 700 - 7/l %801/1020 643/84.0 \\BL� t III 1 Crt I _ 13269}%f6 p° �cE�I. Po/ /, 1 111 rmll� I,. ,.1 �ll 4l I IfnT.,i t AV 1 Ixn4 99 !� 56,2/]20 6 �r-�I% 1 ♦� -�ij— 1.. 11LACNHAJ/N — �C4ke i 105 53.2 /fi80 111 (/ 106 f~ 7,r% LIL_ ( PARK-- r� N .S FJc_�f1]./.GIO 90 129 570(10 0 �`�f� i r YCQO r000HAVE11 / 75�1�j'J i 16 `}'�{AI //- �1{�� /J✓'i PAAN GI/iS / �111. V � • 14 1l ADTC�'T �/ '1�� I6�N YOALE 11 AD I- --(C bl l%]201 L� ' .�-..._,N0 2 I[ y/(�� tI /µ I l j 126 51.}/67p / -���• 4-�'1 I J �� 123 121— 18. .� SKovnAlk%tiE 1 �� Iril Ll rl_ 127 r__ ���� 12 �O�44i N I.I�t .': I�: �- 99"�4��19•_/✓ 526/67.0, /X�—; 110059 9175,,,Q1 I]] SUBJECT PARCEL "Rae -- FIG. *3 City of eagan WATER approved: standard PUBLIC plate ##: WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT 1_ATE%Al ',FjdE�IT 'r,RoM _ Z Y APC Minutes June 24, 1986 Ir 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all 2f the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig. of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west • of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. C Secretary - APC DGK Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three JADDITIONAL ITEMS SOUND LEVEL METER PROGRAM A. League of Minnesota Sound Level Meter Program --On at least two (2) occasions, the City Council has given consideration to the purchase of a noise sound meter. On one occasion there was interest expressed in purchasing a noise meter for the purpose of monitoring airport noise and more recently, there is discussion regarding acquisition of a noise meter for monitoring the Sperry semiconductor facility. The high cost for a noise meter was a reason in both cases as to why a sound meter program was not established. A second • reason related to potential liability if the noise meter is used as an enforcement device. It would be necessary to have an employee properly trained if the results of the noise meter are to be used as reason for enforcing ourrnoise ordinance. The City has an environmental noise ordinance and with the growing number of complaints related to noise compatibility, Administrative Assistant Hohenstein was asked to research available sound meter programs and also address the liability factor if the noise meter were to be used by City staff in an effort to enforce the noise _ordinance. The League of Minnesota Cities has a sound meter program which is available to the City and is explained in the attached memo prepared by Administrative Assistant Hohenstein, found on pages —167 through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny implemen- tation of the sound meter program through the League of Minnesota Cities. 11G5�; MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: JULY 8, 1986 SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES SOUND METER PROGRAM Pursuant to our conversations, I have investigated the availability of sound level analyzing equipment. The purpose of this memo is to outline briefly the information that was gathered and possible alternatives for City action. The incidence of circumstances under which a sound level meter might be used in the City of Eagan are apparently increasing. These circumstances include a number of citizen complaints regarding the enforcement of the City's Environmental Noise Ordinance, complaints about ® traffic noise, requests for studies of noise compatibility for developments, and the increasing level of aircraft noise. Currently, it is neccesary to request special studies of the MPCA to enforce or study any of these items. In the past, the City Council has expressed concern that the conduct of noise studies might tend to increase the City's liability to law suit. I have.contacted a number of noise experts including Dave Kelso of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Tom Duffy of the National Organization to Insure Sound ---------------Controlled Environment,- John Nelson of the City of Bloomington and the Metrosonics Corporation. None are aware of precedent cases which hold a city liable for noise simply because it has conducted studies about its presence or level. In fact, there is a possibility that the new state noise standards may place a liability on cities for allowing land uses which are noise ® incompatible with those already in place. While the League of Minnesota Cities continues to oppose this rule and lobbying efforts may result in its amendment, the City may be best served if it is able to anticipate noise levels through the use of a meter before approving certain uses. Purchase prices and capacities for such equipment vary widely. A hand held unit from Larson -Davis Laboratories costs roughly $1,300. The Metrosonics sound level analyzer lists for $10,000. Electronic Design Company, Bruel and Kjaer and Quest Electronics all have equipment priced somewhere between. Obviously so great a diversity in equipment and cost implies a need for an expanded level of expertise in the sound analysis business before good decisions can be made on capital expenditures. For this reason, it may be advisable for the City to take part in the League of Minnesota's Sound Meter Program. The League purchased a number of 3M Model 3220 sound level meters with the intention of making them available to member cities at a nominal fee to conduct sound analysis. To date, response has been low and the League is willing to distribute them to cities on a loan basis without financial obligation except for unnecessary wear and tear. A copy of the custody agreement for such equipment is attached for your review. The City may have the equipment for up /6 7 Sound Meter Program July 8, 1986 Page 2 to 18 months without charge and may renew the loan agreement at that time. The PCA also makes available training for City staff who may be assigned to conduct measurements with the equipment. The The training is conducted by MPCA staff member Dave Kelso and City of Bloomington staff member John Nelson. It is conducted as a portion of the Minnesota Police Officers Skills Training program. Initial training time commitments require only a couple of hours and subsequent training can be modified to fit specific interests. Because the nature of the complaints- described above varies widely, it may be advisable for representatives of several City Departments including Inspections, Planning, Police and Engineering to undertake the training. The availability of a sound level analyzer and the training in its use will allow the City staff to become familiar with the operation of such equipment and allow for more informed decisions if we were to consider purchase of such equipment in the future. Please inform me if you have any questions concerning this matter. Alnistrative Assistant Enclosure JDH/jeh In Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Item 1.. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicols Road) --On February 18, 1986, the public hearing was closed and the project approved for the upgrading of Nicols Road from Kings Road to Beau D Rue Drive under the above referenced contract. Also, the preparation of the detailed plans and specifi- cations were also ordered. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to the Council for their information, review, approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bid solicitation. The major concern regarding the upgrading of this road, besides the proposed assessments, dealt with the width and location of the trailway. The Council had directed Staff to meet with the property owners once final plans had been prepared and the proposed location of the trailway could be accurately located 1 in the field. Enclosed on page 7 is a memo regarding the results of that meeting. Also, it should be noted that Staff designed the road improvement on Nicols Road north of Diffley Road to offset the proposed road improvement as far to the west as possible to minimize the impact of the trailway construction — and to maintain as much boulevard green space as possible.- Also, ossible. Also, because of the changeover in engineering personnel, these plans were not able to be completed until recently. Subsequently, the estimated construction timetable requires that only the southerly half (Kings Road to Cedar Ridge Circle) be initiated .this year with the north half (Cedar Ridge Circle to Beau D Rue Drive) beginning during the spring of 1987. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail these plans at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 86-2 (Nicols Road) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Thursday, August 14, 1986. A;f MEMO TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: TRAILWAY NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR NICOLS ROAD CITY PROJECT 460, CITY CONTRACT 86-2 On Tuesday afternoon, July 8, 1986, I met with seven out of fourteen of the property owners noticed who are impacted by the proposed trailway along Nicols Road being placed in front of their property. Prior to meeting with them, Bruce staked the east edge of the trailway on each person's property. The general consensus of the meeting was that most property ® owners were pleased with the trailway location because we were able to keep it away from front yard trees. Therefore, the location of the trailway does not appear to be a problem. As per the trailway width issue, the majority of the residents in attendance requested a five foot sidewalk instead of the eight foot trailway. I would divide the feeling of the residents into three areas regarding the trailway. There were some people who were vehemently against an eight foot trail, some people who had no problem with the eight foot trail until the five foot sidewalk substitution was brought up and one person who supported the eight foot trailway. I cited that the eight foot trailway is a standard in the City for two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic and that staff would still be recommending the eight foot trailway but that I would forward their comments to the City Council through you. I don't know how many people will attend the meeting Tuesday night. I imagine the ones who most vehemently oppose the eight foot trailway will be in attendance. I told them it would probably be after 10:00 before the Council could get to the issue of approving plans for Nicols Road upgrading. I also told them we didn't anticipate beginning construction on their end until next spring. In an unrelated item, the residents were very concerned about the speeds on Nicols Road. I suggested that they write a letter to you requesting that Nicols Road be added to the City's list for further speed study by Mn Dot. I don't know how far the residents will push this issue. I would be happy to discuss this matter in further detail with you if you so desire. (Z-9 Assistant City Engineer 76 RMH/jeh • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Five PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) --On June 17, the Council approved the final plans for the installation of streets and utilities to Daniel Drive adjacent to the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and authorized the advertise- ment for the bid opening that was held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, July 11. Enclosed on page /,S71 is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the engi- neer's estimate contained in the feasibility report discussed at the public hearing held on June 17, 1986. All bids will be checked for accuracy on additions and extensions and a final recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the July 15 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Our File No. 49395 DANIEL DRIVE • BID AMOUNT -- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ FEAS. REPT EST -- % UNDER ENC. EST — % UNDER FEAS. REPT EST. -- 6335d / P7 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, July 11, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $268,527.50 294,183.95 PROJECT 475 $240,277.50 270,000 283,870 302,959.27 306,402.85 328,807.20 331.847.05 PROJECT 468 $28,250 37,000 42,270 -23.6% —33.2% CONTRACTORS 1. Nodland Associates 2. Burschville Construction 3, C.L. Contracting 4. Northdale Construction 5. J.P. Norex 6. Crossings Inc. • BID AMOUNT -- ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ FEAS. REPT EST -- % UNDER ENC. EST — % UNDER FEAS. REPT EST. -- 6335d / P7 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, July 11, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $268,527.50 294,183.95 PROJECT 475 $240,277.50 270,000 283,870 302,959.27 306,402.85 328,807.20 331.847.05 PROJECT 468 $28,250 37,000 42,270 -23.6% —33.2% • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 3. Contract 86-11., Award Contract (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) --At the July l meeting, the Council received the bids for the installation of sanitary sewer facilities to service the above referenced subdivisions.. However, the bids received for the Williams & LaRue sanitary sewer exceeded the estimate contained in the feasibility report by approximately 19%. Subsequently, the Council directed Staff to review these increased cost estimates based on competitive bids with the property owners to see if they still wish to proceed with the project. If the project is reaffirmed as discussed under the public hearing section of this agenda earlier in the meeting, it would be appropriate for the Council to award the contract to allow construction to begin. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award Contract 86-11 (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) to J. P. Norex, -Inc. in the amount of $172,387.20, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related contract documents and, if .appropriate, authorize the preparation of appropriate change orders to modify as...nece_ss_ary _----- /73 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 11, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE PROPOSED CHARITABLE GAMBLING POLICY City Councilmember Ellison prepared some information regarding a proposed Charitable Gambling Policy for review and discussion by the City Council. A copy of the policy and an Ordinance from the City of Janesville as presented. by Councilmember Ellison is attached on pagesthrough City Councilmember Ellison is planning to address this item immediately following the regular Council agenda as a part of City Council round table. • BLUE BELL ICE CREAM Attached for City Council reference is a letter that was sent by the City Administrator to Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. stating the specific conditions of operation. The letter is on page / BUILDING PERMITS Attached on pages ZZL through is a copy of the June Year -To -Date building p rmit informati AIRPORT NOISE Attached on pages /F,7-- through AV is a copy of a letter that was submitted to the City by a resident frustrated with the airport noise. • I -35E ACCESS FROM YANKEE DOODLE ROAD City Councilmember Wachter has asked for information regarding an additional access to I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from the City of Eagan and a response from the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the I -35E access. This information is enclosed on pages IY5 through IE6 . SANITARY SEWER BACKUP/ASPEN DRIVE At the last City Council meeting both Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Egan received a letter from Mr. Steven Kaplan,repre- senting Peggy House, for damages she sustained relating to a sanitary sewer backup. Since the item was addressed at the City Council meeting, a copy of our Public Works Director's response is enclosed on pages f % through IFOV . i7� FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORTS Enclosed on pages /E through Z�/� are copies of the March and April Fire Departm@nt Reports. 7— MN DEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS/TERESA A PIVAC VS CITY OF EAGAN Attached on pages through /5�%i is a copy of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights response stating that charges brought before the City of Eagan on hiring practices by Teresa Pivac have been dismissed. The Department of Human Rights has determined that the complaint of illegal discrimination is without merit. POLICE INFORMATION Enclosed is a copy of various police instances that have occurred from mid-June until early July. Also enclosed is a response • regarding the amount of training our child protection officer has received. This information is enclosed without page number. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 175 ED CHARITABLE GAMBLING POLICY THE CITY OF EAGAN GOAL: Set a policy ensuring that charitable gambling in Eagan is conducted by Eagan non-profit organizations and that the proceeds from that gambling are used for the betterment of our community. METHOD: 1) Require that organizations receiving charitable gambling licenses be non-profit groups, and show that at least half their members either work or reside within the City of Eagan (zip codes 55121, 55122 or 55123). Require such organizations to have at least 40 active members. 2) Require that applicants pledge (and later verify) that 80 percent of the net proceeds collected from charitable gambling be used to sup- port recreational, civic or cultural programs benefiting the citizens of Eagan. 3) Require that gambling to be done only in the premises owned by eli- gible approved organizations, or on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Eagan. 4) Require gambling within leased premises to be separate from the bar or service area, and do not allow sale of liquor within the leased area. Require that the sale of gambling paraphernalia be made by an active member of the conducting organization, or its auxiliary. Prohibit an owner or employee of the leased space from selling gambling paraphernalia while on duty. 5) Require the minimum age for charitable gambling to be the same as — the minimum age for drinking intoxicating liquor. ------------------- —------------ - REASON: 1) There is only a limited amount of revenue to be derived from chari- table gambling in Eagan, and organizations with a base in the city should have first claim on those dollars. Placing a minimum membership • at 40 people will stop fly-by-night groups from coming in and setting up shop. 2) Persons who participate in charitable gambling should have some assurance that their contributions are going toward worthwhile causes. Earmarking the great majority of revenue toward community projects should allay those fears. 3) By putting charitable gambling operations in locations dependent upon city licensure, the city will maintain better control over the activities. 4) Bartenders shouldn't be selling pull -tabs, even if they belong to the approved non-profit group. That turns the bar into a casino. Gambling paraphernalia should only be sold in separate leased areas by club members. Requiring the club to supply sellers will reduce the amount of casual gambling. 5) We don't want minors frequenting our bars. --30-- /J/ 'ORDINANCE NO. 206 An Ordinance to Provide for and Regulate �! The Conduct of Gambling and Related Activities within the City of }' Janesville, Minnesota City Council of the City of Janesville, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: . Subd. 1. Purpose and Intent. This ordinance is enacted for the following 'Purposes: to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the inhabitants of ,'ahe City of Janesville by closely regulat- ing the conduct of gambling. Subd. 2. The City Council finds that "gambling is a nuisance prone activity and as such, is subject to restrictive regula- tion. The Council further finds and declares that the ability to conduct gambling and participate in gambling, is 'a privilege rather than a right. Subd. 3. Provisions of State Law Adopted. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, relating to the definition of terms, licensing and restric- tions of gambling are adopted and made a part of this Section as if set out in full. Amendments made pursuant to legisla- tion to said Chapter shall also be incorporated and adopted herein without further action. Subd. 4. Local Approval of State Licensed Organizations. Pursuant to M.S. 349.213, the Charitable Gambling Control Board for the State of Minnesota must notify the City Council before issuing or renewing an organization license at the State level for those _ _,:organizations whose premises are located within the City. If the City Council adopts a resolution disapproving the State license and so informs the Board within 30 days of such notice, the license may not be issued or renewed. Subd. 5. Obligations of State Licensed Organizations. State licensed organiza- tions within the City shall provide to the City Clerk copies of all information which such organization provides to the Charit- able Gambling Control Board. Such copies shall be provided to the City Clerk within seven days after the State licensed organization sends such information to the State. Failure of a State Licensed organization to provide such copies shall constitute a basis for disapproval of the license or renewal by the City Council. Subd. 6. Eligibility for License. Eligi- bility for a charitable gambling license within the City of Janesville, shall be restricted to local fraternal, religious, veterans and educational and other non-profit organizations. A local organiz- ation shall be defined as an organization having at least 40 percent of its members who list a Janesville City or Rural Route mailing address which would include the existing Janesville zip code, 56048, or its successor as determined by the U.S. Postal Service. 177 Subd. 7. Use of Proceeds of Charitable Gambling. All applications for licenses ;hall state the proposed use of funds received from the gambling activity. No license will be approved unless verifica- tion on the application is.stated that at least 80 percent of the net proceeds collected from lawful charitable gambling shall be used to support recreational, cultural, and civic programs benefiting the citizens of Janesville. For purposes of this subsection, net proceeds shall be computed as follows: gross receipts from lawful gambling less reasonable sums necessarily and actually expended for the following items: (a) prizes; (b) gambling supplies and equipment which shall be defined as those expenses authorized by the Charitable Gambling Control Board in their adopted rules, specifically Subpart 2 (B) of Adopted Rule 7860.0160; (c) rent; (d) utilities used during gambling occa- sions (e) compensation paid to members for conducting gambling; (i) taxes impos- ed by Minnesota Statute Section 349.212 and; (g) maintenance of devices used in lawful gambling. - Subd. 8. Premises. The use of or sale of gambling supplies and equipment de- scribed as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on the premises owned by eligible organizations as defined in Subdivision 6 of this Ordinance. Except for the preceding, the use of the gambling supplies and equipment described in this Subdivision shall be allowed only on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license -issued by the City of Janesville for the . sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor. Subd. 8A. In leased locations authoriz- ed by this subdivision, the sale of pull -tabs, tip boards and the operation'of paddle wheels shall take place in a designated area of the leased premises which area shall be separate from the counter, bar or service area. No sale of on or off sale liquor shall be allowed within the leased area. Locations authorized by this subdivision which are owned by the charitable organization need not desig- nate such a location within the premises. Subd. 9. Only those persons who have reached the age at which they are allowed to consume intoxicating liquor by Min- nesota Statutes, shall be allowed to participate in the charitable gambling use of pull tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards or shall be employed by the organization requesting the charitable gambling li- cense for the purpose of accomplishing the sale of the gambling devices describ- ed in this subdivision. i. Subd. 10. Hours of Operation. The use or sale of gambling supplies and equip- ment described as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on premises owned or leased by those organizations eligible for a charitable gambling license pursuant to Subdivision 6 only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 1 a. in. -.,- . _. :f Subd. 11. The above notwithstanding, the conduct of bingo and sale of raffle tickets shall be allowed on Sundays and legal holidays when not prohibited by, Minnesota Statute 349 and any amend- ments thereto. 11 Subd. 12. Employees. Compensation to persons who participate in the conduct of lawful gambling, may be paid only to active members of the conducting organ- ization or its auxiliary, or to the spouse or the surviving spouse of an active mem- ber. - - , . _ , .. Subd. 13. The sale of pull -tabs; 'tip boards, paddle wheels and raffle tickets when accomplished on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Janesville for the sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor shall be accomplished by an active member of the conducting organ- ization or auxiliary or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member of the conducting organization. The pre- ceding notwithstanding, if the person conducting the sale is also the owner or the employee of the establishment wh re- in space is being rented by the cor- ing organization, said person may n 11 any pull -tabs, raffle tickets, or other charitable gambling supplies while he or she is then on duty with the lessor. Subd. 14. Each organizationwhichis licensed to conduct charitable gambling within the City of, Janesville, shall provide the City Administrator with a copy of all financial reports submitted to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board on a quarterly basis if there is any charitable gambling by that organization within the reporting period. - .. Subd. 15. To the extent- allowed by Minnesota Statutes, the Council may by resolution set a licensing or permit fee for the conduct of charitable gambling within the City of Janesville. The resolution may set fees for application, processingo ny application, including whatever a is are deemed appropriate to defray th st, of investigation of the proposed applicant by the Council, City Administrator, or Chief of Police and to make a determina- tion of the propriety of granting said li license. The City Administrator shall prepare a local application form and shall include verification that the applicant agrees to abide by the local ordinance concerning the conduct of licensed char- - itablegambling. Subd. 16. This Ordinance shall not regulate the. conduct of non -licensed . gambling as defined by Minnesota Stat- ute Chapter 349 et sec. - . . Subd. 17. Criminal Penalties. Any willful violation of the provisions of this Ordinance constitutes a misdemeanor. Subd. 18. Should any section or subsection of this Ordinance be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as. awhole or' any part thereof other than the part so ' declared to be invalid. Subd. 19. Ordinance No. 198 is hereby' repealed. Passed by the City Council this 28th day of April, 1986. arm -lllu � 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 July 7, 1986 MR GLEN BARON BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC 3218 SNELLING AVE MPLS MN 55406 Re: Approval for Blue Bell Ice Operate On Public Streets Dear Mr. Baron: Inc. to of E BEA BLOMQUIST Mayor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER COenb11 Members THOMAS HEDGES City A minislrasor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE I City Clefk In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc., was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public streets throughout the City of Eagan. The action was taken subject to the following conditions: 1) sub - miss -ion of an --insurance certificate providing the level of liabil- ities outlined in a letter from Mid -Continent Agencies, Inc., to the City of Eagan dated April 16, 1986; 2) hours of operation will be noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset; 3) the approval is granted until October 1, 1986; 4) the trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels; 5) caution swing arms will be required on each vehicle; 6) local employment will be used for drivers operating in Eagan. The City Council has directed our Police Department to record any and all complaints that may be received regarding operation of the ice cream truck. It is the City Council's desire to consider an ordinance sometime after October 1 that would address the aforementioned conditions and any other language they might desire if food/beverage vehicles are to be allowed in the future. If you have any questions regarding the action taken by the City Council, feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedge s City Administrator /71 cc: Jay Berthe, Chief of Police E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk/Director of Finance THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 191 806 Electrical Plumbing 192 83 884 637 HVAC 162 740 Water Softener Signs 25 159 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 1 =-.1 G NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED wnuTM v //I TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 5 FOUNDATION 2 30.00 30.00 485 SINGLE FAMILY 105 9,207,500 41,257.00 20,612.50 232,5 .25 24 DUPLEX 6 390,000 1,956.00 978.00 12,634.00 117 TOWNHOUSE 26 4,228,600 14,971.00 4,513.50 147,573.50 8 CONDO 1 438,000 1,278.Ob 639.00 14,304.00 1 APT BLDGS 1 5,760,000 14,583.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 0 AGRICULTURAL 11 COMMERCIAL 2 625,000 - 1,853.50 926.75 9,566.75 26 COMM/IND REMODEL 5 131,372 795.50 375.50 1,237.50 2 COMM/IND ADDITION 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTIONAL 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 13 RES. GARAGES 4 26.,180 256.00 -- 272.00 12 RES. ADDITIONS 1 5,184 56.50 -- 59.50 9 SWIM POOL 5 45,900 384.50 .156.75 565.75 89 MISCELLANEOUS 32 95,216 1,224.50 -- 1,283.00 0 DEMOLISH 1 HOUSE MOVES 1 -- 15.00 =- 15.00 806 TOTALS 191 20,952,952 781665.50 35,493.50 636,480.75 YEAR-TO-DATE 806 78,467,602 314,353.50 151,072.20 2,121,317.70 //I PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE JUNE 1986 MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN TYPE # OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 6 3 6 390,000 1,956. 193.00 978.00 $ 12,634.00 4-PLEX 12 3 12 683,600 3,624. 340.00 1,812.00 24,790.00 5-PLEX 5 1 5 345,000 1,700• 172.50 850.00 10,645.00 7-PLEX 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM RE 8-PLEX 9 5 72 3,022,0009,202. 1,511.00 1,629.00 105,298.00 APT. BLDG 1 1 1441 5,760,000 14,583. 1,538.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 12-PLEX 1 1 12 616,000 1,723. 308.00 861.50 21,144.50 TOTALS 1 34 14 251 10,816,600 32,788, 4,062.50 13,422.00 390,882.00 �o COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN � BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 3908 SIB MEM HWY DAKOTA CTY. 12215 L 123, B 1, CEDARVALE OF REALTORS $ 13,000 $ 98.50 $ 6..50 $ 49.25 $ 154.25 COMM REI 12217 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM RE L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 1 COMPANY 12186 3815 NICOLS RD BRAD RAGIN 30,000 193.00 15.00 96.50 304.50 COMM RE' L 2 B 25 SECT 19 TIRE CO 12138 4030 PILOT KNOB RD ST JOHN 15,372 116.50 8.00 58.25 182.75 COMM RE NEUMAN NEUMAN CHURCH 1325 EAGANDALE CT OPUS CORP 69,500 343.00 35.00 171.50 549.50 COMM RE 12152 T. I B 1, EAG CTR IND PK #7 12153 680 DIFFLEY RD NW BELL TELE 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM NE 4250 LEXINGTON AVE S LEXINGTON CTR 600,000 1,683.00 300.00 841.50 9,298.50 COMM NE 12172 T. 1 R I- FAG QTR 1ST LTD PARTNER PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - JUNE 1985 NO. OFFICE HOURS - INSPECTIONS THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Wilding 710.5 1.878 Plumbing 145 8415 HVAC 92 372 Signs 0 Administrative/Office 21 Fire Marshal MULTI-FAMILT 274 11,375,000 77 5 225 Miscellaneous General 57 '-4.7 Office 254 -- Permit Processing 1]6.5 1,287.1 COMMERCIAL 5 1,317.2 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 165 651 Electrical U W Plumbing 131 610 HVAC 113 532 N ater Softener 3 520 Signs 9 63 62.5 6 66.0 Well Cesspool—, Septic lank 1 42 18,900 202 1 0.� MATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED SWIM POOL • TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee, SAC d MAC charges, rater meter, roadunee, parks dedication A rater treatment Plant fee. TYPE NO. VALUATION-VPERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEE 320 SINGLE FAMILY 90 $ 6,415,000 $ 31,160 $ 15,580.25 184,925.] 38 2 -FAMILY 0 149 MULTI-FAMILT 27 11,375,000 32,914 16,457.00 489,010.5 2 AGRICULTURAL 0 -- -- gU 25 COMMERCIAL 5 4,475,000 12,102.5 6,05!.25 61,547.2 I INDUSTRIAL 0 m U W U 0 INSTITUTIONAL O U W 2 PUBLIC FACILITIES I 6,400 62.5 a 66.0 12 BES. GARAGES 4 18,900 202 — 212 12 SWIM POOL 4 52,850 406 64.25 497.2 90 XISCELLANEOUS 34 128,100 1,216 156.50 1,442.5 657 707AL5 165 22,471,250 78,063 38,709.25 737,697.2 m YEAR-T0.DATE 651 59;263,287 239,804 117,670.50 1,664,091.0 • TOTAL FEES INCLUDE: Building permit fee, state surcharge, plan review fee, SAC d MAC charges, rater meter, roadunee, parks dedication A rater treatment Plant fee. 3 U 6 W U m W gU Q, M m U W U W U U W O W W W a a o a o o O O O 0 0 0 N o 0 0 o m r ut ut w W IO r1 r T 1'1 r n m r a S o n r F O O N O O V W O N r N N 2 W 1 r7 N A s 1 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O N O O r1 N O N O O w O P OI b P P v � U N U N N N o 0 �roi o o uoi W r n 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 O p O O N O O F a m N o m < .-1 n rl m o. .1 N ❑ S F m a a0 m a a a U 0 o s 0 C U 3 O z v U > W Z ❑ m a W m W O a O a W a O ❑ m Or F OU .O]WO.Fs=❑000 F4 1XW 4mNWmCF4 Z Wv.0UWUW a U0£ F W•a a• NHN� Wrv,❑j�0 ON �a'amF U OmUmUm e a o m o .n o in aa.yN r m.ymNNn ry wt v O e H 0 0 0 0 0 0 a �: ;' I �3.:. t•�S i Eli l Illll • 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Ma r PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER February 18, 1986 courcd Members THOMAS HEDGES GN Admmehww EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Oty Cl.k MR KERMIT MCCRAE DISTRICT ENGINEER MNDOT DISTRICT 9 3485 HADLEY AVENUE NORTH BOX 9050 OAKDALE MN 55109 Re: I -35E Access From Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) Dear Kermit: At the regular City Council meeting of February 4, 1986, the Council expressed concern regarding the potential traffic conflict associated with the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road wanting to proceed northbound on I -35E. As a result of these concerns, they directed me to contact your office ---- to get a response to the following questions: -- - - 1. Why wasn't a direct "diamond interchange" access ramp provided for northbound I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road instead of the existing "loop" in the southeast quadrant? 2. When does the state plan to install the traffic signal on County Road 28 for the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road onto northbound I -35E? Your review and response to these questions will be appreciated and forwarded to the Council for their information. If any additional explanation is necessary to clarify the Council's concerns, please contact me at your convenience. 7erely, f-1LThomas A. bert, Director of Public Works TAC/jj THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYM80L OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY dANNESOT4 �o yo Minnesota Department of Transportation District 9 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9050 North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Telephone 779-1178 March 7, 1986 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 2830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Sox 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 ® Dear Mr. Colbert: SUBJECT: C.S. 1982 (I -35E at Co.Rd. 28) 1f In response to your two questions in your February 1P8, 1986 letter, we provide the following: 1. The traffic projects that the interchange was designed to accommodate showed that the predominant movement was eastbound Yankee Doodle Road ___-tonorthbound .I -35E.._ Therefore, the loop was provided to eliminate the left turn conflict that would have resulted with a standard diamond interchange .ramp design. 2. A Contract to install traffic signals at this intersection has already been let. Construction will begin this spring with the • traffic signals in operation in the late summer. We trust this information answers the Council's questions. Sincerely, Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer An Equal Opporluniq, Employer of 3630 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 July 9, 1986 MR STEVEN Z KAPLAN HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON 1221 NICOLLET MALL SUITE 700 MPLS` MN 55403 Re: Sanitary Sewer Backup Claim, (Yankee Doodle Road) 1542 Aspen Drive Dear Mr. Kaplan: .4, June 7, 1986 BEA BLOMQUIST THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES Ctty Admnbt w EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CIN Clete Mayor Blomquist and Councilman Egan requested that I respond to your letter of June 23 regarding the damages sustained by Peggy House"L21^a't1h'9—t6 the sanitary sewer backup of June 7. Your comment of apparent "serious and fundamental design deficiencies in the City's sewer system" cannot be substantiated by our review of the sewer system. While we are aware this is the third occurrence of sewer flooding to her home since 1979, the first two occurrences were directly related to construction activities of which the City had no knowledge or control over specific operations that resulted in damage to our sewer line. . With approximately 160+ miles of sanitary sewer..througEout the , City, our maintenance crews have set up a routine inspection, cleaning and maintenance of all lines on a repetitive basis. ,''This aggressive maintenance program has greatly minimized the number of sanitary sewer backups per mile of system to a very effective level. However, there is no way that the ,City can predict or prevent future sanitary sewer backups. I am not aware of any situation where the City has been "wholly unresponsive" to Ms. House's request for implementation of corrective measures. We have discussed -various alternatives with her and informed her of options that she may choose to implement if she wishes to achieve a higher level of protection beyond what -- any other homeowner is provided by our municipal maintenance operations. IS4 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 4s KR STEVEN Z KAPLAN JULY 9, 1986 PAGE 2 It is my understanding that Ms. House has been compensated for past damages by the insurance company representing the contractors responsible for the previous sewer backups. We have also forwarded her most recent claim to the City's insurance agent for investigation and action. In summary, we cannot find any "obviously serious defect" in our n- ••,sewer system. We have placed this particular segment of sanitary :'sewer on a high maintenance schedule and will be televising it in the near future to further verify the integrity of this system. I will be happy to review with you any definitive and positive recommendations you may have regarding our sanitary sewer. collection system. hope that this letter satisfies your request for a prompt response from the City of Eagan regarding this matter. Sincerely, t A-.Colbert;--`p:E.77 - Director of Public Works TAC/jj EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPAME NT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF April 1986 TYPE MAN HOURS Fire/Rescue 932 Training 433 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 163 Station Maintenance 205 Fire Prevention 42 Administrative 499 TOTAL 2,274 Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave Rookies FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other TOTAL STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 1 1 1 • 9 4 6 11 15 9 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 a- -- -- 25 22 18 KMER 5 $ LOSS • $ 800 5 2 19 8 2 41 $ 800 LOCATION OCCUPANCY S LOSS 17 EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTT4ENT MONTHLY REPORT Z ,i J FOR MONTH OF March 1986 j File/Rescue 594 Training 493 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 168 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 28 Administrative 291 TOTAL MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 AD 1 1 1 Chiefs Available Days 9 4 6 Available Nights 11 15 9 Available Rotating 2 1 2 On Leave 2 1 0 Rookies 0 0 0 25 22 18 TOTAL — — FIR$/�7E TYPE NUMBER $ loss • Structure 4 i n n Grass 2 Vehicle 2 2,500 False 4 Medical 10 Other 1 23 2,600 "AL LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES DATE NAME LOCATION OCCUPANCY $ LOSS 3/16/86 Coachman Apts. Car $2,500 10 1 M/fi got7a rr- ,June 27, 1986 Thomas Hedges, Admin Ci I:y of Fagan 3795 Pilot Knot) Road Fagan, MN 55.127. Dear Thomas Hedges: Hmali RFF: 614335 -MCS -1S Teresa A. Pivac VS. City of Fagan dFC- ti P. CZ)orf} The Depaltmeut of Human R:ighLs has made an i.mpartl.al irlqui.ry into . the issues, ra.i.sed (n L.he ;,bove captioned charge, drid has reviewed the i.nformal,ion provided in conuect-i.orr with Lhe charge. Anal.ysl.s of the InformaL,i.on ava.i.lahle .in this rrratter discloses that Etre comp 1.a.i.nC of illegal. di. scri,mina t.*I.on .i.s INi1.hout mer i. t. Minn. Sl:al:- 363.06, Sui1d- 4(1.), provides for the Commissioner's dismissal of charges which are found to he without merit. The charge has been disrni.ssed pursuant Lo this provision. The Department will take no further action on this ❑tattel . Pursuant Lo Minn. Star.- 363-14, Suhd. 1.(b)(1), Lhe charging party may bring a civil action against the respondent in district court, within 45 days of Lhe dismissal of this case. If you have any questions, you may contact the department at (612) 296-5669. Since ,ly, • Dr. Linda C. .Johnson commis_;ioiler Enclosures AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 500 Bremer Tower, 7th Place and Minnesota Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612)296-5663 or (800)652-9747 Rased to the 4 (1). cgo�7 MEMORMNDUM of I �Gl'yG'v Ref: E14325 on the information stated below, this case has been DISMISSED pursuant authority vested in the Co7waissioner by Minnesota Statutes 363.06 subd. 1. A review of the qualifications, experience, and education of - the applicants hired for the positions in question indicates 40 that these factors, and not an illegal consideration of sex, were the criteria used by respondent to select the successful candidates, since all persons hired possessed higher qualifications for the position than did charging party. It is not the intent of the Minnesota Hunan Rights Act to prevent an employer from using any nondiscriminatory criteria it desires in making personnel decisions. -�i 2. Charging party stated that she had speculated that respondent ------.might.-, -screen applications subjectively because she has reason to believe a neigh:.,oring municipality has done so. 3. The Minnesota Human -slights Act provides that the employment of one person in place of another, standing by itself, shall not be evidence of an unfair discriminatory practice. AN Eq'_'AL OP-ORTUN!TY EMPLOYER .CJ c . •L.irso;a Si101 or p5'.)1'.5" -37a7 . LIQUOR LICENSE GUIDELINES City of Eagan 1. Off -sale liquor establishments will only be allowed in areas zoned for commercial business. 2. Liquor stores will not be allowed within 500 feet of schools, churches or _ residential neighborhoods. (State law requires only a 300 foot spacing, only �t from schools and churches.) If any existing store is within the 500 -feet limit, they will be grandfathered in. 3. Off -sale will not be permitted in an on -sale establishment. 4. Liquor stores will not be allowed adjacent to establishments that serve primarily a juvenile audience (candy stores, video game parlors, etc.). 5. Conviction of selling alcoholic beverages to minors will result in an imme- diate, automatic forfeiture of that person's liquor license. Reapplication ^^ cannot be made for at least three years. Other topics for consideration: -- Should off -sale stores be limited to free-standing buildings? -- Should stores be spaced at least one mile apart? -- Should an economic feasibility study be required? Q� 1 R RESOLUTION EAGAN CITY COUNCIL COMPRI HOTEL JULY 15, 1986 WHEREAS, four applications were submitted by Opus Corporation and Compri Hotel Corporation for rezoning from GB, General Business and L-1, Light Industrial to Commercial Planned Development, preliminary plat approval for Compri Hotel and conditional use permit for Compri Hotel building on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Industrial Park 1st Addition in Outlot A of Eagandale Office Park located at the southeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive in Eagan; and WHEREAS, further a request was made for an amendment to the Comprehenisve Guide Plan from Industrial and General Business Use to Commercial Planned Development including Roadside Business use for the location of a hotel on the property, and WHEREAS, a portion of the property had been designated for a Roadside Business use classification, but the Minnesota Department of Transportation at the time of the acquisition of adjacent property for the construction of the I494/Pilot Knob Road interchange acquired part of the property formerly designated for Roadside Business; NOW THEREFORE upon motion duly made by , seconded by , it was RESOLVED that the Eagan City Council be and it hereby is on record as follows: 1. The applications described above are hereby denied for reasons including the following: a. LIP c. 2. The application for amendment of the Comprehensive Guide Plan to Roadside Business use is hereby approved for reasons including the following: a. A portion of the property had previously been designated for Roadside Business use, but the interchange of Pilot Knob Road/1494 was expanded to include a part of the RB property and therefore in order to accomodate a hotel on the site, it is necessary to expand the Roadside Business use area. b. The owners of the property have for an extended period of time intended that a hotel/motel be constructed on the general site. C. The strategic location at the southeast quadrant of Pilot' Knob Road and 1494 is an appropriate location for hotel/motel use to accomodate the rapidly growing commercial, industrial and residential uses in the general area and an amendment to the Comprehensive Guide land use plan would be feasible and appropriate. Ca Those in favor: Those against: NOW THEREFORE upon motion by seconded by it was RESOLVED that the City Council is here on record as follows: 1. The applications for rezoning, preliminary plat approval and for conditional use permit are approved subject to the following conditions: (See conditions provided in Planner's report.) Those in favor: Those against: Dated: ATTEST: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN By: By: E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk Beatta Blomquist, Mayor AGENDA REGULAR MMING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL - JULY 15, 1986 6:30 P.H. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS PJ( A. Parks & Recreation Department f.(o B. Public Works Department IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA ,p8(l A. Personnel Items U \DLB. Contractors Licenses \4 C. Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation/ V Retirement to 18 Months 1p D. Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Office Park 2nd) (PE. Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) •, �at(oF. Project 439, Receive.Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) 11G. Project 44.1, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) \IH. Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (O'Neil Pond Outlet) Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating) ra .XoJ. Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) 10 K. Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report 1 (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) at L. Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition Q 24M. Final Plat Approval, Overbill Farm 2nd Addition Final Plat Approval, Rahn Cliff 1st Addition 0. Project 85-M, Final Acceptance (Wescott Hills 4th Addition -Storm Pa Sewer) V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets � 44SB. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition IkgD. Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition _ Sanitary Sewer (Continued from July 1, 1986, meeting) pq,SlE. Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Rd. -Trunk Storm Sewer 9OF. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of ��• Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City (Continued from the June 17, 1986, Meeting) �, ut✓� '� o� r• sp� �c�, �o� --h��- s r;lc\ L�R,,.,, -to CO �]�, �\ S-FC� 'LSi '• /LLcMn..ri . Co o. C int o n .sL��onn ��eZ, .who Q ol0- 1'� L S.s."C C o CC,? _ Qa e S I t� o w nfix c\ c • _� -0o o -v\ c9J • s �y LLQ IOq Pam C p0_ii•Q.9� E -t .-Lek �P� VI. OLD BUSINESS D�,ga A. Off-Sale Liquor License for. Town Centre 70 (Curtis Johnson) TT Continued from June 17, 1986, Meeting P� q3 B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments VII. NEW BUSINESS ftgSA. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/Dakota County HRA First-Time Homebuyers Program B. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace Corporation) Duplex Lot Split for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, Lot 5, Block 3, Abutting Vienna Lane, NE C. 1/4 of Section 31 Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 S.F. of Addi- tional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign, Dakota County Bank, Lot 2, Block 2, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 7—D. Rezoning (Overbill Properties, Inc.) from R-2, Residential ��� Double, to R-1, Residential Single, for Lots 1,2;5,6,&7, of Block 2, Overbill Farm 1st Addition, Located at Dodd & Cliff Roads, SW 1/4 of Section 25 E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising, Sign Company - V U Mark Baird) for an Advertising Sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, Located South of I-494 & East of Pilot Knob Road, NW 1/4 of Section 3 • p^,\� Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition 00O (Sienna Corporation) Consisting of 69 Single Family Lots on Approximately 34 Acres Located West of Dodd Road & North of Cliff Road, SW 1/4 of Section 25 Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office \ O Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant on Approximately 7 Acres & a Rezoning from GB (General Business) & LI (Light Industrial) to Commercial Planned Development & a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment on Lots 1,2,&3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park & Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, Located at Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive, NW 1/4 of Section 3 ss� 13\ H. �O Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds (Robert Engstrom) Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19.6 Acres & a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) Abutting Pilot Knob Road to the West, South of St. John Neumann Church, SW 1/4 of Section 22 Preliminary Plat for The Trails of Thomas Lake (New Horizon rlk�I. QC) Homes) Consisting of 60 Townhouse Units on Approximately 14 Acres Located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, North of Clemson ,II & West of Thomas Lake Road, NW 1/4 of Section 28 \S1 J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments (Design Collective) e� Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres & ce, Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) Located South t6 of Violet Lane Abutting Federal Drive, SE 1/4 of Section 16 �a �J 0 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS of ,JGG A. League of Minnesota Cities Sound Level Meter Program iU B. Public Improvement Projects 1(49 1. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicoll Road) 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) 3. Contract 86-11, Award Contract (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham P� -11 3 Corporate Center) I%. VISITORS TO BE BEARD (for, those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT r1 LJ 3 MEMO TO:. HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS • FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 10, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION After approval is given to the July 15, 1986, agenda and regular City Council .meeting minutes for the July 1 meeting and special minutes for the June 26 meeti-ng, the following items are in order for consideration: A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --At the July 1, 1986, City Council meeting, the Parks & Recreation Director and Advisory Commission were given direction to proceed with further negotia- tions on expanding the acreage of Northview Athletic Field and to acquire the 15 acre Ohman parcel adjacent to the Fairway Hills plat. Regarding consideration to purchase the Barr parcel located on Highway 3 for a future athletic site, was continued •and the Director of Parks & Recreation was asked analyze certain tracts of land throughout the City that might be available for future athletic field's and present a map and findings to the City Council for review. That study has been -completed and for a copy of the study, refer to pages 7i through_ 5 . The Director of Parks & Recreation will be available to review the study during Department Head Business. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the Director of Parks & Recreation and Advisory Commission regarding land acquisition for a future athletic field site. 0 11 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARES AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 9, 1986 HE: ATHLETIC SITE ACQUISITION At the City Council meeting on July 1, the City Council reviewed Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission's recommendation for athletic site purchases. The City Council approved the Commission's recommendation for the acquisition and development of two of the three sites. The third site was continued pending further reviewal. Council expressed some concern over the proximity of this parcel to the City's eastern edge, and a desire for a more centrally located facility. Staff was asked to provide information concerning which other parcels had been reviewed, and the general process for searching and reviewing alternative locations. Attached to this memorandum are three graphics, which will help to depict the ® process Staff used in searching out suitable parcels. The first graphic locates all commercial and industrial property, and properties which -have been platted for residential or other purposes. Other parcels blotted out are existing park holdings, public facilities such as school property. The second graphic depicts parcels which Staff and Commission have reviewed. The extent of each reviewal varied with the particular parcel. Some parcels were explored and rejected, because of severe topography. Other parcels were reviewed, but excluded because an indication of a high sales price. Finally, others were reviewed after preliminary site planning was initiated. The final composite shows remaining parcels which have not been reviewed, but were excluded for one reason or another. An intensive review can be made on any of these parcels, if the Council feels it would be appropriate to review and discuss these further. Staff was also directed to review the parcel immediately south of the City's municiple center. This parcel is approximately 8.74 acres in size, and abutts Pilot Knob Road. This parcel is currently being offered for sale with a $70,000 asking price. Landscape Architect, Steve Sullivan has prepared a concept plan for this site. This concept plan will be presented at the Council meeting. KV/bls C, J v Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two • B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1. Receive Peti ion, Wescott Road (Streets) --Enclosed on pages r dthrough F is a copy of a petition received from several ents of the South Hills Addition as referenced on page requesting a reduction in speed limit and the improving of that gravel portion of Wescott Road, between the highline crossing and South Hills Addition. " Enclosed on page 16 is a map showing the relationship of the present improved section from Elrene Road to T.H. 149 along with that segment being constructed under Contract 86-13. Prior tothe improvement of this remaining half - mile section of Wescott Road, it will be necessary to install the appropriate utilities to service potential future development of adjacent properties. Therefore, if the Council is to give any consideration to this requested improvement, it should consider not only the street improvement but also the required underlying utilities. During 1985, the City requestedMn Dot District 9 to perform speed surveys on various streets within the City of Eagan to determine • the appropriate enforceable speed limit that would be approved by the Commissioner of Transportation. The results of that study indicated that the portion from South 'Hills Drive to T.H. 149 should be established as 50 M.P.H. with that portion from Lexington Avenue to South Hills Drive (gravel) not posted. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for the upgrading of Wescott Road and order/deny the installation of appropriate improvements. n U J RECEIVED Juvi z 3 }g . We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently • increased speed limit of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE n U ,,,,cw.11oy77v7 f� L/�/J C� 4S.2-�s4a ((t Chiitinniy 3707 500-4l 4LU7 `-I5to-05� MzO!I�. RECEIVED Ju1v We the undersigned residents of South Hills in Eagan object to the recently • increased speed limit of 50 mph on Wescott Road. We believe that this increase in the speed limit (from 35 mph to 50 mph) jeopardizes the safety of our children who must wait for the school bus on Wescott, and those of us who enjoy biking on that street. We also object to the fact that Wescott Road, east of Lexington and west of South Hills Drive, will not be completely paved. We understand that only a portion of it will be paved and we feel that as taxpayers in Eagan the job should be completed. If Wescott Road is to become a major crossroad the road should be completely paved, as it makes little sense to keep one-half mile of it a bumpy dirt road that does harm to our vehicles. Please give these concerns of ours consideration, as we want the best for our children and neighbors. NAMF ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1 )n, 1�-� -t_.'�4e v n .Pnr ;-I ( -1 ---) V " S'/'�-. �. (ti_ '+� = U 36 ti 'row 6 ro IL s3 ISO, Z 10 c Ix ea 12 13 14 r1:100 �edvx LLJ fiOU U) LANE TH WILL! My t KK. io oll L I r % .... ..... ........ Sou S.LS ir LLI Y.'_ 44 WESCOTT ROAD WETCOTT Mn"• NII&I N. W. 1/4 SEG 24, T-4 ............ • ID �I 3 a J y Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting is Page Three There are fifteen (15,) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should' be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required in brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS: Item - 1. Clerk Typist (Pool) --Fourteen applications were received by the City for the vacant position of part-time, clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. Of these applications, six applicants were given typing tests, written tests, and were interviewed. Itis the recommendation of Administrative Assistant Duffy and Administrative Secretary Finnegan that Corrine Smith be hired to fill the vacant clerk -typist position. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Corrine -Smith-- to fill the vacant position. of clerk -typist in the typing pool in Administration. The appointment is to be effective July 14;, 19'86,. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four CONTRACTOR LICENSE B. Contractor's Licenses --Attached on page /3 is a list of contractors who'are renewing or who have been selected and retained' as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their client's permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THISITEM: To approve the list of Contractor Licenses are presented. Y • • • CONTRACTORS' LICENSE JULY 15, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. FIRST LANDMARK BUILDERS 2. HOMECARE, INC 3. HOUSTON CONSTRUCTION 4. MADERA HOMES INC 5. MCGOUGH CONSTRUCTION CO 6. MIDWEST FENCE & MFG CO 7. MOE-OSUM CONSTRUCTION CO 8. M.J. MOSER CONSTRUCTION 9. MARTIN SCHUTROP CONST 10. T.J. CONTRACTING INC 1. AIR REFRIGERATION 2. ALBERS SHEETMETAL & VENT 3. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG PLUMBING 1. DAVE DEMPSEY PLBG. 2. FREEPORT HARDWARE (PHIL'S PLBG & HTG) 3. LICHLITER BROS 4. GARY MENNE & SONS HTG & PLBG 5. MCGUIRE MECHANICAL SERVICES INC 6. NIKKO PLBG 7. QUALITY PLBG. • 8. ROSEVILLE PLBG & HTG INC 9. TERRY'S PLUMBING 10. WOODBURY MECHANICAL INC �� • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five EXTENSION OF HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE C. Extension of Health Insurance Coverage Following Resignation or Retirement to Eighteen Months --On April 7, 19'86, the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA) was signed into law by President Reagan. COBRA requires an employer to provide the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees and dependents to the following limits: 1. Eighteen months from the date of termination of employment, for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct or reduction of hours; or from the date of reduction in an employee's hours, if such a reduction causes a loss or reduction of the employee's coverage. 2. 36 months for the employee's spouse and dependent children from the date of: a. The death of the covered employee. . b. Divorce or legal separation of the covered employee. • c. The covered employee becomes entitled to benefits under Medicare. d. A dependent child ceases to be eligible as a dependent according to the terms of the insurance plan. Continuation of coverage will end prior to either. the 18 or 36 month period as of the date on which: 1,. The person covered under the continuation fails to make timely payments as required under the plan. 2. The continued person becomes eligible under another group medical plan. 3. The continued dependent becomes eligible for Medicare.. 4. A spouse who is continuing because of divorce or legal separation remarries and becomes covered under a group health plan. 5. The group health plan, insured or self-insured, ends. The continuation coverage is required to be identical to the coverage provided to persons actively participating in the plan. The necessary premium may be required to be paid by the person • whose coverage is continued. Agenda Information Memo July 15,'1986, City Council Meeting Page Six CONSENT AGENDA, ITEM C. (continued) State Law currently requires continuation for 12 months instead of 18 months, and this. is the procedure that the City of Eagan has been following. It is recommended that this continuation period be extendedto 18' months to conform to Federal law.. The entire cost of the premium will be paid by the person whose coverage is continued. Therefore, there is no additional cost to the City of Eagan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the option of continuation of medical care benefits for employees ,and depen- dents to 18 or 36 months (depending upon the circumstances) as provided by Federal law from the date of termination of employ- ment for reasons other than an employee's gross misconduct. 0 15 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seven PROJECT 446, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING ,EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 2ND ADDITION D. Project 446, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assess- ment roll completed. .This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 446 (Eagandale Office Park 2nd Addi- tion) and schedule the public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 435, AS IC ® E. Project 435, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan Woods Office Park) --Final costs for the installation of streets and utilities to service the above referenced subdivision have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This assessment roll is being presented to the Council for their review and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adop- tion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 435 (Eagan Woods Office Park) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986.. 439, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC F. Project 439, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Safari 2nd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Safari 2nd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final •assessment roll for Project 439 (Safari 2nd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight • PROJECT 441, RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING WESTBURY 3RD ADDITION G. Project 441,, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Westbury 3rd Addition) --All costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service the Westbury 3rd Addition have been tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared_ This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 441 (Westbury 3rd Addition) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. PROJECT 443 RECEIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL/ORDER PUBLIC H. Project 443, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (,O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) --Although construction is not 100% complete on the above referenced ,project, all assess- ments associated with this project are trunk area rates which are not dependent upon the final costs of the project. Subsequent- ly, the final assessment roll using these set trunk area assessment rates have been completed. This roll is being presented to the Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing for formal adoption. ACTION TO BE. CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 443 (O'Neil Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) and schedule the final assessment public hearing to be held August 19, 1986. • 17 4 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine CONTRACT 86-8, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 1986 SEALCOATING I_ Contract 86-8, Approve Change Order #1 (1986 Sealcoating)--At the July 1 Council meeting, the Council received bids and awarded the contract for the 1986 Sealcoating Program to Allied Blacktop - ping. Due to the exceptional bids received, the 1986 program based on bids received ($69,775.58) was considerably below the 1986 budget ($122,0.0.0.00). Subsequently, the Council directed the Staff to review our Sealcoating Program and work with the contractor to determine if additional streets could be added to this year's contract to take advantage of the exceptional bids received. Staff has prepared a Change- Order which would add approximately $50,805.0;0 to the sealcoating contract bringing the total amount to $120,580.63. Enclosed on page is a listing of streets that are being added to this year program under this Change Order. WACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM•: Approve Change Order #1 to Contract 86-8 (19'86 Sealcoating) in the amount of $50,805.05. • • PAGE NO. 00001 07/10/86 STREET NAME Thomas Ln Richard's Ct Walden Dr Kirkwood Dr Parkview Ln Gabbert Cir Sudbury Ln Sheffield Ln Sheffield Cir Shevlin Ct Golfview Ln ** TOTAL ** 41AGE NO. 00001 07/10/86 STREET NAME 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -2 AGGREGATE FROM Cliff Rd Thomas Ln Thomas Ln Lexington Av Lexington Av Parkview Ln Wilderness Run Rd Sherwood Way Sheffield Ln Sherwood Way Yankee Doodle TO 200' W of Walden CDS CDS Parkview- Ln CDS CDS Wilderness Run Rd Norwood Dr CDS CDS Dead End 1986 SEALCOAT PROGRAM FA -3 GRANITE AGGREGATE FROM Comserve Dr Yankee Doodle Rd Towerview Rd Pilot Knob Rd Slater Rd Cliff Rd Robin Ln Blackhawk Rd Blackhawk Rd Cliff Rd Slater Rd Cinnamon Rdg Trl Cinnanom Ridge Trl Cliff Rd Rahn Way Rahn Rd Rahn Rd Cliff Rd Cedarview Dr Old Cedar Hwy Library Park'g Lot ** TOTAL ** • TO TH 13 CDS Storland Rd Blackhawk Rd Diffley Rd Cinnamon Trl Slater Rd Dead End Rahn Way Cedarvale Blvd SQ. YDS. 4786 2230 2400 1927 4260 1166 5038 2530 1430 2033 2836 30636 SQ.YDS. 9416 4820 19452 8665 26350 6036 8836 1476 2959 4504 9435 101949 • fo Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986., City Council Meeting Page Ten PROJECT VE FEASIBILITY REPORT J. Project 478, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington Hills Addition - Sanitary Sewer) --Recently, staff received an application for development of the property east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road. While this appli- cation is being processed through the Planning Commission at their July meeting to be considered by Council in August, the developer has requested that the preliminary study and feasibility report be initiated to provide the sanitary sewer service necessary for this parcel's development. Recognizing that there are no guarantees of approval through this staff/commission/council review process, yet guaranteed all costs associated with this report and detailed plans and specifications, if for some reason this project is not approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 478 (Lexington Hills Addition• - Sanitary Sewer) and order the feasibility report and detailed plans and specifications,. 479, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT K. Project 479, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) --Similar to the reasoning associated with the petition for Project 478 discussed previously, the developer of the Lexington South PUD (Jim Curry), has requested the Council to prepare the feasibility report and detailed plans for the installation of trunk storm sewer facilities for that area east of Lexington Avenue between Northview Park entrance road and Diffley Road. This trunk storm sewer will be necessary for the development of Lexington Avenue in 1988 and any earlier development of land within this portion of the Lexington South PUD. Mr. Curry has guaranteed all costs associated with the preparation of this report and detailed plans if for some reason the project is not approved at the time of formal public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, and order the feasibility report and detailed plans. PQ Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven • FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER ADDITION L. Final Plat Approval, Wyndham Corporate Center Addition --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Wyndham Corporate Center Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road opposite Corporate Center Drive, by the Trammel Crow Corporation. Enclosed on pages and are copies of the legally described final plat and site plan for the construction of the Eagan Woods Garden Hotel, showing the modification of the road entrance to Pilot Knob Road. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat at the time of approval by Council action on August 20, 1985, have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to; be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Wyndham Corporate Center Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • N' • EXHIBO „A„ • WYNDHAM CORPORATE CENTER 1 �m I .. ..__ CIS awn BLVM f LOT 1 Op BLOCK 1 ; 1 W W L) 0.). X 3 I q --l.,w.�.�r.+.iw�a.•r_w..i.p—.i..i�r..�. :. o..�.i.wii� w..._../ -. ,_a -..r .xm �.'):�'�•�� _rr..r �••�/F aw�ti/i�.a«w. \ 8y ~ e-_;• '�i ��t lE n ,P. 1 � 001+0. yio Ru pp [i rp, Pum — -- — PPy..+... /�•k.•1P..w.✓F. a. rPrs <.,.P. -r — —T usorYn`unv XV u[A4[yI[o puMi Wl]O if ILZL . rm�l.v lurtn ur roto u unuunpL r. n.. _.y....r.- . nas.mla e. uol[ rl... omnlu ono. (wlluw[o omPnt (p¢)pnln[[., u[I¢o a ¢moult Illt[�. NI. J.'...1 ➢rrd s 7. I. C � PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES 1 iy •�. t I � I I � •,MA 1 smiC � sIs PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES i EXHIBIT „q„ PMMI eurNmr Io`erueruuLe • 1140M Ie� reru areveca, TM CORPORATE CENTER ////DRIVE I N Ne Th" Psnlnan aeon Inc PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES EAGAN WOOD GARDEN HOTEL iuu[ RECORD PA IND A SITE DMENSION PLAN 7 Agenda Information Memo July 1'5, 19'8'6, City Council Meeting IS Page Twelve 11 FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, OVERHILL FARM 2ND ADDITION M. Final Plat Approval for Overhill Farm 2nd Addition --We have received a request for final plat approval for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition, located east of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Enclosed on page Z5 is a copy of the proposed final plat. All conditions placed. on the preliminary plat approval of March 19,, 1985, have been complied with. Also, all final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Overhill Farm 2nd Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 471 • • 1 OVERHILL FARM SECOND ADDITION / Nq H LW w wEF LL rw "T AmTICY - -T 7u - r-•om-T 1 1 1 I I� s' II 1� I n : I_ 11 II II N 1 I . 4 II I I •r I I Imo- � I. r IIs~' � anlp• [IEYQY II "tie C Yt�M•v.[ i t ! 1 Cy 2 •A 3 __Jl io'p �-li ion iil,`r Ly!'.. -.A• - w4 J 4 �i L.Eoo-� 5 BD 1i �_ J um- 1 6 8^. �� l_ 1! um-• I 7 9" um- 1 g 8� L_ J Lrm I• OYAaEC 4YlaIM g 04. � l aI I!� 1 do -+am-i - _I V .J ana •Aar mNYraxrollAnw _ . - •. auowrs w omo xup w nm ww DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT [L[�Tla•aaa.n ARE SHOWN THUS: t"L N]10 q nET IN YOTM ap 1pVui lTIQET NL! NrO!([LT N V6TM Pp wpaK {pr Lca wlns orxuErs[ Nwurzo MINNEWTA VALLEY S.AYff S I.C. z5 SEG 25•T -27,R23 MTlY IEYD ' NnpTy NL lA F g rn sr uo ![W e am Eolo A awcLl[ VICINITY MAP SCALE,I INCH • 100 FEET loo m o wo [m o Damn !/• lx[x sr l[ .q1 um nrE LQPAm, ssr AIO lr�lll®n CainarNw R ersa, Ina[a oPara NwrL M 4frM Y4 Or M 11[mIU "T p pI[INLL Pal run wnnoN•rs asLlPzom luE xer Y'!12 u04L IEUPGf YC E[YiPE MAA. 21 is Agenda Information Memo July 15, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, RAHN CLIFF IST ADDITION N. Final Plat Approval for Rahn Cliff 1st Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Rahn Cliff 1st Addition located south of Cliff Road and west of I -35E. Enclosed on page Z is a copy of the final plat. All conditions placed on the preliminary plat approval of October 2, 1984 have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Rahn Cliffls.t Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 26 I4 t L;I;i... •�C^Miw Y.. N V r .I: CAI. CRg4- 1 1 il,Epl. OF X� Clii>rLl' \.rl .�iil X IY•!!'Pr[ IIOOJ RAHNCLIFF 1 ST ADDITION • aroru Itl. Yir•n room m .=.l/!• PIP.14 roxlnn ssl uo m.ue n r.l.l. tl. 1[iN —L�1—O[W.[f'nml. s f.Q[J 0[4CIrm N O.XOu ¢Vx m �tfuurm 1�O NN��[iplxa w Mri•ffi�[Yci} [ep.ml,. Xlnm.ol. p.rin. r. lo. mr^ .n. pr.prlel.r a In. oualN. a.a.lae IIM Ilu.blln u. wnl. ,nr, ..rl IIM Yrinwll W.rl.r .I IM II. bA au41.a [wYr� XI• IanYa b�N I1 IrrnYr's VIM brN .1 W.rl.r� Svu 0 Yvn.. .irwwl..Yl] .......... Illl.ni. [.r In1.M 1..11. U. Ia Mt .l Y.Irnlry. wiaiiii lii .mina ya a. ..er YNu .ni Na. a'IXa .1.1 r lull .M .I II III^Y w. YI,(.uto el Ln\ n Ywn u . ww. n,'.i ei'in r.. , w•w�°Inrll w n. �:i. 4. u X... nnwm Lm•Y. sun v .mmu tGYn p IMI. _dI.1 r.ye lA nl .Y a iu1.YY Yl.0 w 4r .1 el_.. r.nm..r ., 6. Mll.uu fap.nl, . .ol. wr4mrNlp.. r"lv .l nam.mlp.Y X Y b wn.. nrLll. Y Y4 .I .'1[w_. 4M L111 [wnll .1 L.yn. XIwYY Yrr.w. Ya rlu. R [alum o.bo 'mn. mx.bu you (siny.[Ilrw.ou b YIIw.n1 l..0 a..M I.. n.lu u1.M N I Xur.1 x1111 Un I Mu a MI .N Iluu. IM W4R11f .tl111101. _ YI sl 1. Ln I'UI bI.l1Y ..n[;a['1.1•^ I11 p .11'.aL.nel . N Is I1.1 l.el MIF•nalu..'I. '.I,rwNn. .11[o X. .w w ••[ al.0 fr... Mll.r . Iw nnry a.ie�:e w XIIM•u Lo 61I1N1.1 .N.r IMn .. .npn. a[tlnl Ytl. 4.\llluu "i.r 11 i .�nn[i'eilu. Nn n•l.i liu i.:.n plra. PI. ..nle [. r.un.eY1.N id..v. u Imwu LI[.n. Intl [�Y ��.• w�. lln[. r7.e I. �. �... YM sun a XlYlwu resin a xlvuu b l..e M •!11[. X .. IX Lal..lXn Ypin.rJul�tl� IYl ..r nu.. m.0 fsw.. Mu.YY. JAMES R. HILL, INC.I 40 F, 1 LJ Agenda I-nformation Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 85-M, FINAL ACCEPTANCE O. Project 85-M, Final Acceptance ('Wescott Hills 4th Addition - storm Sewer --As a part of the development of the Wescott Hills 4th Addition, an existing trunk storm sewer line had to be re- located. This work has been completed with all final inspections being performed by a representative of the Public Works Department and our consulting engineering firm, with a recommendation for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85-M (Wescott Hills 4th Addition - Storm Sewer) and accept for perpetual maintenance. Al Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen PUBLIC -HEARINGS PROJECT 476, HIGHVIEW AVENUE - STREETS A: Public Hearing for Project 476, Highview Avenue - Streets -- In response to a petition received from several property owners who use Highview Avenue, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing bei g scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages -30 through is a copy of the feasibility for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. Enclosed on pages � through e� is a copy of the original petition submitted, requesting improve- ment of this section of roadway. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to those property owners who are proposed to be assessed under this project. This segment of Highview Avenue was originally proposed to be upgraded under Project 292 in 1980. At that time, the estimated rate per front foot was $21.00 with the final assessment rate being $19.24 per front .foot. The estimate contained in this report is very conservative based on the assumption that the majority of the existing gravel base will not be able to be salvaged due to the final subgrade evaluation along with the plan and profile design of the final street configuration. More detailed and accurate cost estimates can be obtained once detailed plans and specifications have been prepared and even moreso after formal bids have been received. The consulting engineer will be available to discuss this project during the public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 476, Highview Avenue (Streets) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifi- cations. 29 • • • REPORT ,M HIGHVIEW AVENUE (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 660' WEST STREET IMPROVEMENT�S PROJECT No. 476 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49396 Baned,&w, Ra&ws, f4.r4lria ap 4edac&,&d, ./"c. G' 49 t movda" 0 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636-4600 June 11, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) Street Improvements Project No. 476 Our File No. 49396 Dear Mayor and Council: urw n tlnnr,Pw,, P.I. Ruhr" W, xwrnr. P£. J.,h C. AndrdiA, Y.E. tlrud/urd A. Lrnrhrrx. P.E.. Xrrh.d E. Turnrr. 10E' Jwon C. of.. Y.E. (:Irnn X. CuuL, Y.G. Arran A. GwJun. I'.G. Inman !'. Nuys. Y.E xirhurd W. Lwrrq Y.E. Robrrr G. SchumMr, P.E. Marvin L. Swwlu. P.E. Maald C. Bwjardi. P.E. Jrrry A. tluwJun, P,E. W4 A. Ilurum, PE. I'rd X. Pvld, Y. E, hh, Awl T. Nuuurrunn. Y.E. E. IJand U. l.w/uw. PL: Iran.. W. Krr.nm, PE. AhrAarl C. L""h, P.E. Aurtn L. Wdlu. P.E. Sumo X, Mu/and. P.E. A'ennrrA P AnJrnun. P.E. AnrA A. tlmhmann, Y.E. Mur! X. Xol/J, P.E. Nuhn C. Xwwh. Ihumw E. An,., Y.E. Churls A. !'nW run Lr,, M- Pu W, Md.. M. oh.. Swan M. EbML Enclosed is our report for Highview Avenue (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west), Project No. 476. This report covers street improvements and includes a pre- liminary assessment roll. • We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: June 11, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 r / Approved A • PP b Y Department of Pu.Alic Works Date: 5696d 30 Year 3 Anniversary ® SCOPE: This project provides for street improvement for the unpaved portion • 11 of Highview Avenue from Pilot Knob Road to a point 660' to the west. The pro- posed improvements include upgrading Highview Avenue to a residential standard (concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving) for streets in the City of Eagan. Highview Avenue is abutted on both the north and south side by six (6) single-family, platted parcels. This portion of Highview Avenue also serves as a major access to the homes in the Valley View Plateau Additions. Traffic counts recently taken by the City of Eagan measured the average daily traffic (ADT) at the east end of Highview Avenue to be 499 ADT while at the west end was 323 ADT. Although these traffic counts are well in excess of what should be encountered on a gravel road, they also indicate that 36% of the traffic is generated from the lots in the Highview Acres development. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Highview Avenue between Pilot Knob Road and a point 660' to the west of Pilot Knob Road is an existing gravel road. Water main and sanitary sewer were constructed in this section of Highview Avenue in 1968 and 1970, respectively. In 1980 storm sewer was extended from an existing storm sewer in Pilot Knob Road to the low point in Highview Avenue which is located at the westerly end of the project proposed herein. As part of that same project, Highview Avenue was also upgraded with concrete curb and bituminous surfacing from the westerly end of this project to Highridge Terrace. Page 1. 5696d 3Y • • • Therefore, it is proposed as part of this project to upgrade Highview Ave- nue to a 32' wide butiminous street with concrete curb and gutter. It is assumed for purposes of this report the existing aggregate base is not of suf- ficient depth or cross section to be utilized in the upgrading of this street. It is also assumed common excavation will be required to construct the street to a proper elevation and cross section. Upon completing the required excava- tion a 6 inch thick Class 5 100% crushed aggregate base will be constructed, in conjunction with bituminous surfacing, concrete curb and gutter, manhole adjustment, and driveway and boulevard restoration. However, as part of the preparation of the plans and specifications a more detailed analysis will be done to better evaluate if the existing aggregate base can be utilized. In addition, it may be less costly to construct a thicker bituminous base course resulting in less excavation and aggregate base construction depending on the final design cross section of the road. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: 5696d Assessment and Construction Area SE 1/4 Section 4 Highview Acres Lot 1 Lot 2 (021-00) Lot 2 (022-00) Lot 7 (074-00) Lot 8 (081-00) Lot 8 (082-00) Page 2. 03 ® COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $47,670 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited pro- perty. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs will be revised based on final costs. The assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess the coat of street on a front foot basis to the • Knob Road was upgraded in 1980. Therefore, as part of this project it is pro- posed that a 75 foot corner lot credit be applied to that frontage abutting Highview Avenue for Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00). REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue abutting property it serves. Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00) were previously assessed for their entire frontage abutting Pilot Knob Road at the time Pilot • Knob Road was upgraded in 1980. Therefore, as part of this project it is pro- posed that a 75 foot corner lot credit be applied to that frontage abutting Highview Avenue for Lot 1 and Lot 8 (081-00). REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Street $47,670 Street Assessment $47,6-70- 47,670$47,670 $47,670 $47,670 -0- All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there are no funds required from the major street fund. Page 3. 5696d 3f� KI • PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 5696d Page 4. 35 June 17, 1986 July 15, 1986 August, 1986 September, 1986 Fall, 1986 Spring, 1987 May, 1988 APPENDIX A ® PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE HIGHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' West) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 900 Cu. yda. Common excavation @ $3.00/cu. yd. $ 2,700 200 Cu. yda. Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu. yd. 1,000 100 Cu. yds. Select granular borrow @ $8.00/cu. yd. 800 950 Ton Class 5 100% crushed quarry rock @ $7.00/ton 6,650 210 Ton 2331 Bituminous base course @ $14.00/ton 2,940 210 Ton 2341 Bituminous wear course @ $15.00/ton 3,150 25 Ton Bituminous material for mixture @ $200,00/ton 5,000 • 120 Gals. Bituminous material for tack coat @ $1.50/gal. 180 1,260 Lin. ft. Surmountable concrete curb b gutter @ $5.00/lin. ft. 6,300 6 Each Driveway restoration @ $500.00/each 3,000 6 Each Adjust MH and GV box @ $200.00/each 1,200 1,000 Sq. yds. Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq. yd. 2,000 Total $34,920 + 5% Contingencies 1,750 $36,670 $ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin b Bond Interest 11,000 TOTAL...................................... $47,670 El Page 5. 5696d APPENDIX B ® PREL.IMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL HIGHVIEW AVENUE (Pilot Knob Road to 660' west) STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 476 C� is Parcel Assessable Total Description Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment HIGHVIEW ACRES Lot 1 205 (1) $44.55 9,133 Lot 2 (021-00) 165 44.55 7,351 Lot 2 (022-00) 165 44.55 7,351 Lot 7 (074-00) 330 44.55 14,702 Lot 8 (081-00) 65 (1) 44.55 2,896 Lot 8 (082-00) 140 44.55 6,237 1,070 $47,670 (1) A 75' corner lot credit was applied Page 6. 5696d 7 3 EXISTING STREET M C 2 v PROPOSED STREETIMPROVEMENTS Ir SURMOUNTAIgLE CONCRETE CURB 8 6 GUTTER 34 BACK TO BACK-� 22 (022-00) (021-00) 7 (074-00) so EXISTING --STREET STREET I I I I I I I I (082-00) (081-00) I II I END BEGIN CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION CORNER LOT CREDIT .............. :::•ASSESSABLE FOOTAGE 0 100' 200' Graphic Seale in Feet HIGHVIEW AVENUE (PILOT KNOB ROAD TO 880' WEST) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 478 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ri cr M O 2 Y SONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK d ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul. Minn. Date.JUNE, 1988 Comm. 49306FIG. No. 1 PP-63- I'm r-oT —C17 April 8, 1986 Tom Colbert Eagan Public Works Director 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom, I'm writing to call your attention to the deplorable condition of Highview Ave. in northern Eagan from Pilot Knob to approx- imately 600 feet west of Pilot Knob. As you may be aware, this section of Highview Ave. was left untouched in 1980 when the rest of the street was upgraded by installing curb, gutter, storm sewer and blacktop. In the spring this road becomes a quagmire of mud and potholes; summer brings almost unbearable dust as well as complaints to the Public Works Department requesting that something be done to settle the dust. These conditions contribute to extra- ordinarily high maintenance costs which are borne by all resi- dents of the city. This letter will serve as notice that a petition to upgrade this road is being circulated and will be brought to the Council for their thoughtful consideration and action within the next few weeks. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Ed Martin 1474 Highview Ave. Eagan, MN 55121 Phone: 454-4193 7 z rl s yy 2� Mil S, Ed 1/4SEl!-4vT27jR23 • HIGHVIEW AVENUE PETITIONERS 12� A I 0 1 0 - 7 S City of E.,nli 020-75 rt .4 4 os v. PA 4"j, City of E ... n . . . . . . . . . . e ra J. X m ........... Ma P X. -x H1r,H vierY .............. ... ....... .. -A VE. Iw EK41.-r. ev,y, cc OAD UMT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DOC NO 333669 .... . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . ....... . . .. ................. .................. 9A , ..... . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . ............ . . . . . . ............ HIGHVIEW ......... ......... ......... ...... . ..... ....... ... . ....... C) City of Eogan ......... ......... 094-00zin r. ........ .............. .... o . ......... ........... 6 t . . . . . . . . . . 0 L BRI D & E VIEW AVE . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .•. . z . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . T.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j. . . : -X . . . . . . . . 0 10 - 7 t. E� 020 02 z 0j , e & 12� A I 0 1 0 - 7 S City of E.,nli 020-75 rt .4 4 os v. PA 4"j, City of E ... n . . . . . . . . . . e ra ... ....... X Ca,a/vzy 4. Ma P X. H1r,H vierY .. ....... .. .. EK41.-r. ev,y, cc OAD UMT DOC NO 333669 .... . . ..... . ....... . .. ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . ....... . . .. ................. .................. 9A , 7 ............ ........... . . . . . . . . . . ............... ............ HIGHVIEW ......... ......... ......... ...... . ..... ....... ... . ....... C) City of Eogan ......... ......... 094-00zin r. ........ .............. .... o . ......... ........... 12� A I 0 1 0 - 7 S City of E.,nli 020-75 rt .4 4 os v. PA 4"j, City of E ... n ® TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED I` +' i srrr We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS -4/ _ ��74 ce 7C --/7S— () /Ji� 7 Y- 14-73 1y"PcJ' bsa- 30-:� 5 P 0, P0, I- L • TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED MAY 1 19210' We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface.. NAME ADDRESS 0l '" 9 �o7 7/ //7l i G -w -A �� O.cJ�i-ccs-L�� /`f .��J - 7�"�✓z1�_�J-' — � n U C 444 • TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: RECEIVED f"^y i 19uS We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME ADDRESS 1. P I � i .� b !9°J r .j-, S L ;Vro MAY ! TO THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned, respectfully request that the Eagan City Council undertake a feasibility study to consider upgrading that portion of Highview Ave. from Pilot Knob Road to approximately 600 feet west, from gravel to a bituminous surface. NAME w ADDRESS C $�/-------- t �L -=-J-U & - N' 0' X1.71 U �&) tive_ �r� - LJ5u -6 y 53 '�)' 6 )- C --$,N- / y 3 6 - � Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen 1. • VACATE UTILITY EASEMENT, DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION B. Public Hearing for Vacation of Utility Easement, Deerwood School Addition --We have received a request from. the Rosemount School District #196 to vacate the existing watermain utility easement that is dedicated with the final plat for the above referenced subdivision. This easement is required to be vacated based on the final alignment of the watermain based on a sealed construction. A new easement has been described and conveyed to the City. As of this date, the staff has not received any object'to this proposed utility easement vacation. Enclosed on page w is a copy of the easements proposed to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and vacate the utility easement as described for the Deerwood School Addition. r 1 LJ • TJ,. NW Co n,• .f Ae NW. V41. f At S.6 %f of Sed'. Z/ Twpz?,? 6Z3) LOCATION MAG - ��6 �Y.IS-fi�JG �iSEME�T DEERWOOD SCHOOL ADDITION no•/l. /.ne of l6r NW %*.ffFr 9.E. •/! of S•.lon Z/ ._`yf'.•'.:'17'� 09.99 .r• ,._._.�•rr:.L---'�' 8`a5cRWODP -------- 00 5 '. X31.98 ..... I ... E b y s..... Eu. A ti 1 is 4 bd.1°0 11 I ; u� r1 I'- \ ' _ Cn \t SECTION L TWP Z7 RLE 230¢"x' '� P%9eE 359 t jr �« GropFre Smk;n ful. ■RING R°QS.o �L pPO .55-55 17 -- a V . N! C,...., .f Al NW'/f 7NE. Co•nI• .i T1.e Ib Hd. •K l S«1»n U, 71 V Lf, RaE. 7J P.hA C...1, C.S.M. SH9•JJ'!/'E r 7A. ,le„16 /.:.r .i lA. NalF.rwf %/ .► /Ar 1 $.dh,.e1 %/ .f Sre/.e.. 11 TYP Z7RLE Z3 t_ TF,..rJF/.;. rA.NM'*.114SIC fSeel/en 7./,7Y/Z7,,feFZ3 A......./ /. F." . "";v .S Al. 8915, 4 * W. o Dr.o7n '/e in.F L� /IineF ,ion mend.nml 3.1..1 M/..rni..9ry,iln inn N Lrr /1(891. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen, VACATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, BLACKHAWK GLEN IST ADDITION C. Public Hearing for Vacation of Drainage and :Utility Easement Over a Portion of Blackhawk Glen Addition --In response to a request received from the developer of the proposed Blackhawk Glen 2nd Addition, the Council scheduled a public hearing to consider the vacation of certain portions .of an existing drainage and ponding easement to allow the development of residential property as a part of the 2nd Addition. Enclosedon page Vr is a copy .of the easements proposed to be .vacated. All notices have been published in the, legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected parties with no objections received to date. The Engineering Division has evaluated this request and determined that there would be no adverse impact to required storm water storage requirements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To ,close the public hearing and approve the vacation of the drainage easement as described for Blackhawk Glen 1st Addition. • �7 BLACKH WK GLEN 1ST ADDITION EASEMENT SKETCH. �NM,n {I(pl rx[Mww rl rKtww (V,FCM fas, N 89°3 •�9•W 2230.88 - ip"p LwZ CI rlL wrwerM,ww wrzc `!: 1 o>. as wusuae, nwxer n.caxlwa ruts secono,°m n°xr R;-d.�. eu ~' � J a.a a.y ��' — — — —(—:`a.,orr •'°' .Qxi CO t=$ } w "S, �' . O U T L O T is ?'• .s. i ♦ 'a„ :l,} _ _ \• En .4 7� ,rrr u; . vr¢m rfre.pr F v. \ r'rR° ,/ >-ew.rxur°i nsaur Irk WIlk ���/ 'S � l•' ?�I / O TOUTL I ^°'5[°Wux,°[E.SEupiPp 0.,ia•'p0 O 'O OUTLOT e .E •a...I' �\\� C i � IO . ° , tlF' •�• �e 69 'SBB°5399`E' N 736 .0 „"a�ranS � 3•/g. R - �... °pe��.`f/ +5;°r.trou �� xera're c .g215� c x149.00 .e,su,E, 19n et°•ce,�°e. 'E,r9a P.._5�. °2.,.°%� s pi2192su sscc°i° / sim'.x`o ioo.5 'iccoxo aq'N4a'yV� • �7 b , awl x �_ / fSs ` / $�'� P . 2 (� \\ \ IIx .�d 1 i � xr�'yi•; ��'�etszYEJ L—'v=[� r��'` DENOTES AREA OF EASEMENT TO BE I \ �.� r/' ar B 1 x �a`ye', J fix "' %\\% / VACATED AND NOT COVERED BY(sb° E s is / `` Y., sJe /�`vs F io I \ \ `- 2♦ EASEMENT AFTER PLATTING. 356°xe y.,;. /i.- \ h�j n. y,4 7 ;I = ({ \ ._ ,: 2• 6xs p0.5 .r,Y- i' x/s• p I a .7 IS B -- —__- - - — .._-- t118 g5 t[ox°'�� �tia ✓ / \a_,I as""`55 5 10 66 / ti �' 7 f4. \ •"� 21 E a°. GP'338,6•w °�,...• 1 1 s 4aLLL.� ���•".s _ A PLSCE a, .erJ _ SAA C ouivrvcr ids` � �''." r \ Sl 8�y1�..`' °;A0\ \.� /•°q °j/ 3or N / a '� rte' „•: n :w 23 vl �: n.[x o.4—�,: 4`D• :`�:."'. sd G� \.• �P r' 16....ii it 's: s1 i_ �i l� � I{/f X71: � . �f� �[r 11.um� �rd� C r n 4� �.q• // I^ 9 al I-t..r—_l. Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen 0 PROJECT 450, WILLIAMS & LARUE ADDITION —SANITARY SEWER D. Public Hearing for Project 450, Williams & LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer --On December 3, 1985, a public hearing was held to discuss the installation of sanitary sewer laterals to service the Williams and LaRue 1st and proposed 2nd Additions. As a result of that public hearing, wherein a preliminary assessment roll was prepared based on estimated cost, Council approved the project and authorized the preparation of plans and subsequent advertisement for bids. As a result of the bid opening held on June 27, it was determined that the cost to construct the sanitary sewer lateral, services and related restoration exceeded the estimate discussed at the public hearing. In accordance with Council policy, consideration of the award of the contract was continueduntil the affected property owners could be informed of the projected increased assessments and provided an opportunity to reevaluate the needs for the proposed improvement. Enclosed on pagey D is a copy of a letter sent out by our consultant engineer informing the people of this projected cost overrun_ and scheduling a meeting to be held on Thursday, July 10, to explain the information in further detail with final Council consideration on July 15. It is anticipated that the major discussion of the presentation of this item would pertain to the estimated cost and proposed alternates, rather than the entire project concept. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 450, Williams and LaRue Addition - Sanitary Sewer. • El 0 SPECIAL NOTE The letter from the Consulting Engineer to residents informing them of the cost overrun was not available for distribution with Friday's packet. It will be included with Additional Informa- tion on Monday, July 14. so Agenda Information Memo July 15, 19'86,, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen 40 PROJECT 473, PILOT KNOB ROAD - TRUNK STORM SEWER E. Public Hearing for Projcet 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer --With the proposed improvement and upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to south of Cliff Road, additional trunk storm sewer facilities will be required to handle the runoff generated from this improvement. Subsequently, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was completed and presented to the Council on June 17, with the public hearing being scheduled for July 15. Enclosed on pages_ through is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during this public hearing. There Ire three distinct separate areas where trunk storm sewer will be installed or existing lateral storm sewer revised. With many property owners already being assessed for trunk area storm sewer, no additional assessments would be proposed except for those who have not previously paid their trunk area storm sewer assessment. However, if they were proposed to be affected by either the necessary acquisition of construction easements or inconvenienced by construction activity, the letter enclosed on page was sent out also notifying them of this public , hearing. A so, all notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to those property owners proposed to be assessed, inform- ing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer will provide detailed information pertaining to these proposed improvements and will be available to answer questions and concerns from the Council and public. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer, and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications - is • REPORT rm (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ® PROJECT N®. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49380 .SL /haw/, Mlwwedda '511Y • E • Bonestroo, Rose►ie, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 June 2, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Pilot Knob Road (Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park, City Hall) Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 473 Our File No. 49380 Dear Mayor and Council: Omo G. fi.ara o. P.E. Nuberr W. Rwenq P.E. JwrPh C. Anderlik, P.E. Bradford A. Lembeq, P E. Rirhurd E. Turner, P.E. Jain. C. ORun, P.E. Glenn R. Cook, P E. Keirh A. Gordon. P.E. Thmnm E. Bayo, 1•.E. Rirhurd W. Fwur. P.E R.&,, G..4hunicbr. P.E. Marvin L: Sarvala, P. E. Donald C. B. ,urdr. P.E. Jerry A. Ruurdun, P.E. Mark A. Harman, P.E. Ted K. field, P.E. Mlrhad T. Riarrnann. P.E- Rabrn N_ PJrJJrrlr. AL. Darld O. Lwl mu, P.E. Than,. W, Prlrrsan, P.E. Mirharl C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willa, P.E. Jane R. Midland, P.E. Kennah P Anderzan, PE A'rirh A. Bachmann, P.E. Mark R. RW'. P.E. Ruben C. Ruvek, A.I.A. Thurnaa E. Ars, a, P.E - ScnrrE.,YounK. P.E. Chdrla A. E'rirkaun Lm M. Nu W, Harlan M. Oaon Si a o; M. Ebrrlln Transmitted herewith is our report for Pilot Knob Road Trunk Storm Sewer Im- provements, Project No. 473. This report coveres trunk storm sewer and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00 RO ENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of t e S to o Minnesota. Marc A. Hanson Date: June 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by impartment of Public Works Date: 6 - �/-� 1p 5456d �3 30 Year Anniversary • 0 • SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer im- provements which are required at this time due to the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Cliff Road in 1987. The trunk storm sewer im- provements are located in 3 different areas along Pilot Knob Road and are in- cluded within or adjacent to Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park and City hall. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and only slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. The revision proposes .that the NWL for Pond BP -15 southwest of Evergreen Park be lowered 6.4 ft. to 892.6 as compared to 899.0 as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This revision to the Master Plan is recommended for two reasons: 1. The low point of Sequoia Lane in Evergreen Park Addition can then 5456d be drained southwesterly into Pond BP -15 thus providing additional capacity within the existing 27" RCP located east of Pilot Knob Road through which this area presently drains. Based on design standards utilized today the existing 27" RCP is approximately 30% under design capacity for a 5 year storm based on its present drainage area. Therefore, redirecting the low point of Sequoia Lane to Pond BP -15 will provide additional capacity for the future storm sewer required in Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the con- struction of this line will provide better street drainage At the intersections of Sequoia Lane and Walfrid Street and Sequoia Lane and Lodgepole Drive where additional catch basins are proposed. Also redirecting this drainage area to Pond BP -15 will allow it to ,flow by gravity to the Minnesota River rather than through the Carlson Lake lift station where it would have to be pumped to Thomas Lake resulting in additional long term energy costs. Page 1. 0 2. The existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive presently discharges into Pond BP -16. However, the controlled elevation of Pond BP -16 is approximately 3' higher than the existing storm sewer in Lodge - pole Drive. Therefore, by constructing the outlet for Pond BP -15 at a lower elevation and through the existing storm sewer from Lodgepole Drive, this storm sewer can ultimately be drained dry, resulting in less maintenance in the future.. In addition, the de- sired normal water elevation of Pond BP -16 can be preserved as previously intended. It is recommended the project proposed herein be constructed as part of one contract. DISCUSSION: The project for discussion purposes is separated into 3 different areas. • Evergreen Park: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing storm sewer within Evergreen Park Addition from the low point in Sequoia Drive southerly along Sequoia Drive and then westerly along Lodgepole Drive to Pond. BP -15. It is also proposed to provide additional catch basins in the intersections of Sequoia Drive within Walfrid Street and Lodgepole Drive as shown on the at- tached drawing. In addition, it is proposed to construct a 12" diameter grav- ity storm sewer outlet from Pond BP -15 to an existing 21" RCP, which serves as the outlet for Pond BP -16 and conveys runoff from the Thomas Lake Elementary School site. The connection to the existing 21" RCP storm sewer will be at a location to provide sufficient grade and capacity to serve as the outlet for Pond BP -15. The 12" diameter storm sewer will also connect to the existing 27" RCP from Lodgepole Drive which presently discharges into Pond BP -16. This ® connection will allow the existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive to drain dry 5456d Page 2. 6� and also preserve the existing water elevation of Pond BP -16. Design consid- ® eration for Pond BP -15 are as follows: Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro- Comp. Proposal Comp. Proposed Plan posed Plan posed Plan Storage Plan Out -Outflow NWL NWL NWL HWL Storage (Ac.Ft.) flow cfs (cfs) Berry Patch Pond BP -15 899.0 892.6 901.6 894.7 3.0 2.4 1.0 0.5 Berry Patch Park: Storm sewer proposed for Berry Patch Park provides for con- structing a 12" diameter gravity storm sewer outlet from Mooney Lake ,(Pond JP -7) to Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9. Both Pond JP -8 and Pond JP -9 are included within Patrick Eagan Park. Pond JP -7 is abutted by residential homes to the south and east included in Hilltop Estates while to the north and west it is abutted by large unplatted parcels. However, the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 which also abut Pilot Knob Road are presently proposed to be developed. Therefore, as part of their development plans, they will also be required to interconnect Pond JP -36 to Pond JP -35 and Pond JP -35 to Pond JP -7. Pond JP -36 which abuts Pilot Knob Road will receive additional runoff as part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive. The lateral storm sewer proposed in Pilot Knob Road will be extended northerly and south- erly from Pond JP -36 and ultimately discharge to Pond JP -36. Therefore, due to the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the proposed development of the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 and the current high water elevation flooding park property and trailways, it is necessary to provide an outlet for Pond JP -7 at this time. Design considerations for Pond JP -7 are as follows: Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Existing & Proposed & Proposed & Proposed Proposed Elevation NWL HWL Storage Outflow Pond JP -7 862.8 859.4 865.2 47.6 ac.ft. 1.0 City Hall: Storm sewer proposed at Eagan City Hall includes constructing a Isstorm sewer from the northwesterly corner of Pond JP -6 within an existing open Page 3. 5456d ditch towards City Hall as shown on the attached drawing. Presently, runoff • from Pilot Knob Road and a portion of the parking lot at City Hall is conveyed through this open ditch to Pond JP -6. However, those portions of the ditch which are at a steep grade are beginning to suffer severe erosion. Therefore, due to the additional runoff being directed towards this ditch resulting from the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary to construct storm sewer, in those portions of the ditch which are susceptible to erosion. However, be- cause of the uncertainty of how the property south of City Hall will develop, it is proposed to preserve the open ditch where it is constructed at flatter grade and erosion is less a concern. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for construction of the storm sewer for Hilltop Park and Evergreen Park. Storm sewer for City Hall is constructed on property owned by the City. Therefore, no easements are required. Parcel Permanent Temporary ® Description Easement Easement EVERGREEN PARK Thomas Lake School Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.18 acre 0.37 acre Thomas Lake Lot 7, Block 1 0.06 acre 0.13 acre Lot 8, Block 1 0.07 acre 0.13 acre - BERRY PATCH PARK Hilltop Estates Lot 1, Block 1 0.04 acre 0.16 acre Lot 2, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre Lot 3, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 0.06 acre 0.22 acre ® Parcel 016-54 0.05 acre 0.18 acre Page 4. 5456d 57 AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ® ASSESSMENT AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 010-51 Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-53 Parcel 012-54 Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 SE 1/4 6 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park Page 5. 5456d CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-26 City of Eagan Parcel 013-26 City of Eagan SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan HILLTOP ESTATES Lot 1, 2, 3, Block l SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 012-85 City of Eagan Parcel 010-82 City of Eagan NE 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan THOMAS LAKE SCHOOL ADDITION Lot 1, Block 1 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDN. Lot 7, 8, Block 1 EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 6 28, Blk. 1 Lots 3, 4 6 5, Block 4 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 6 22, Blk. 5 Lots 1 (012), 2, 7, 8 5 9, Block 6 ® COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is listed below: Evergreen Park $162,020 Hilltop Park 68,250 City Hall 39,810 $270,080 The total estimated project cost is $270,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess— period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as— sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. 5456d Page 6. 6y ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef— fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as— sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. 5456d Page 6. 6y TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are • as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Large Lot $0.50/sq.ft. (lst 16,500 sq.ft. of ea. ac.) Regional Park $0.025/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk Storm Sewer $270,080 Trunk Area Assessments $214,402 TOTAL $270,080 $214,402 -$55,678 It is anticipated -$55,678 will be required from the trunk storm sewer ® fund, It should be noted, however, that $92,355 of revenue is related to the proposed assessment to Patrick Eagan Park and Berry Patch Park which is con- sidered the City of Eagan. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report June 17, 1986 Public Hearing July 15, 1986 Acquire Easements Summer, 1986 Approve Plans and Specifications August, 1986 Receive Bids Sept., 1986 Award Contract Sept„ 1986 Construction Completion Spring, 1986 Assessment Hearing Summer, 1987 ® First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1988 Page 7. 5456d APPENDIX A • PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD .(EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 473 A. EVERGREEN PARK 600 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. 250 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 250 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 1,380 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 11 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 1 Each 27" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each ® 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600-.00/each 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 2 Each Connect RCP to existing RCP @$ $600.00/each 30 Lin.ft. Water main relocation @ $20.00/lin.ft. 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 550 Ton Class 5 aggregate base @.$5.00/ton 60 Lin.ft. Concrete curb and gutter @ $12.00/lin.ft. 6,000 Sq.yds. Boulevard sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 0.5 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest ® TOTAL EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION .................... Page 8. 5456d $ 21,600 8,000 7,000 33,120 12,100 4,800 1,000 600 800 1,200 600 15,000 2,750 720 9,000 400 $118,690 5,940 $124,630 37.390 $162,020 B. BERRY PATCH PARK (Pond JP -7 to Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9) ® 1,350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 2 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/lin.ft. 4 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/cstg. @ $500.00/each LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. 16 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 3.0 Acres Seeding @ $800.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest TOTAL HILLTOP PARK ................................ C. CITY HALL 150 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 150 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 540 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 1 Each 24" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 1 Each 21" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $,700.00/each 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 600 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 2.0 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre Total +5% Contingencies +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest ® TOTAL CITY HALL .................................. Page 9. 5456d Y $ 37,800 2,200 2,000 4,000 1,600 2,400 $ 50,000 2,500 $ 52,500 15,750 $ 68,250 4,200 3,900 12,960 3,300 800 700 :11 1.600 $ 29,160 1,460 $ 30,620 9.190 $ 39,810 SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,_340 3,494,200 $0.025 $ 87,355 Regional Park Page 10. 54564 WE APPENDIX B • PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, HILLTOP PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS . PROJECT NO. 473 Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 183,990 Large Lot 75,750 $0.05/s.f. $ 3,788 Parcel 010-51 42,790 Large Lot 16,500 0.05/s.,f. 825 Parcel 020-51 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Parcel 040-51 163,360 Large Lot 49,500 0.05/s.f. 2,475 Parcel 050-51 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Parcel 060-51 161,500 Pond (152,750) 8,750 0.05/s.f. 438 Parcel 010-52 621,335 Pond ( 40,100) 581,235 0.05/s.f. 29,062 Parcel 010-53 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 Parcel 012-54 110,100 --- 110,100 0.05/s.f. 5,,505 Parcel 014-54 202,620 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 015-54 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 016-54 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 010-00 336,000 Pond (236,000) 100,000 0.05/s.f. 5,000 (Berry Patch Park) SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 $0.05/s.f. $ 16,552 Parcel 010-84 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 0.05/s.f. 16,552 Parcel 011-85 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 011-86 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 Parcel 012-86 449,380 Future R/W (20%) 359,500 0.05/s.f. 17,975 TOTAL ......................................... $122,047 SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,_340 3,494,200 $0.025 $ 87,355 Regional Park Page 10. 54564 WE • • 5456d /Page 11. ( NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012-04 PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARCEL NO. ® SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 010-79 Parcel 010-81 Parcel 010-82 Parcel 010-83 Parcel 012-85 • • 5456d /Page 11. ( NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012-04 • POND BP -17 NWL=897.1 HWL= 892.0 21 22 u 23 8 � i 24 71 1 25 26 - 1 ' 1 27 ' 28 - oilHW D 90819 sl N 0 100, 200' L_I ET X10-00 PARK) I 11 10 s B 7 12 14 15 6 13 '[�' m svzl� s S I. -- I AOAPY�LITS I tin 8 M Z 7 6 Of FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT 4 5 U KNOB ROAD) 6 WILDERNESS POND BP -15 SEWER NWL= 892.6 HWL•894.7 POND BP -14 Q NWL• 899.0 O HWL•901.1 0: m 0 Z Y PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS • (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1986 Comm. 49380 FIG. NO. I • s C� 0 500 GroOhiC Stale in Feer �Y= CITY OF EAGAN E 0 010-81. 010 -82 = 011- 85Nr f 016-54 015-54 014-54 040-51 POND JP -7 NWL=859.4 HWL=865.2 050-51 010-5t FUTURE STORM SEWER - 020-51 i r 014-50 FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD)-, POND Jf 9 NWL= 810.7 HWL=831D.0 OSED 12rr M SEWER 010-83* NWL= 819.2 HWL=830.0 012-85>K PROPOSED 12° ,,,,--PROPOSED SEWER Ex. STORM SEWER tl, 1 3Q IVA-- ERRY / PATCH PARK 060-51 010-00* (MOONEY LAKE) 010-53 010-84 d Z 012-86 0 U v , >>, ❑ O 0o a lam, PONDOND Pi 010-52 , POND i. JP -36 PILCri�~ ^Ivvo RI (Co. Rd. No. 31) PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS • (HILLTOP PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1986 FIG. No. 2 Comm. 49380 PATRICK EAGAN PARK — 0' goo G10>AN hON N lwl • CITY a EAGAN LEXINGTON AVE LEXINGTON WAYI i (Co. Rd. N 43) ST. JOHN NEUMAN ADDITION 010-00* IF (Co. Rd. No. 31) F PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN. MINNESOTA b91 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineere St. Paul. Minn_ Dato:JUNE, 168 Comm. 46380 FIG. No. 4 e-; t� IU�I 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOM9UIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 Mayor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN .WMES A SMITH VAC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER CouncY Nambers THOMAS HEDGES July 3, 1986 city rr mIn0ww EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE city chit Re: Project 473, Pilot Knob Road Upgrading/Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements — Evergreen Park & Berry Patch Park Dear Property Owner: This letter is to inform you that on July 15 at 7:00 P.M., a public hearing will be held at the Eagan City Hall to discuss the proposed project providing for storm sewer construction, installation and modifications necessary to handle storm water runoff associated with the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road in 1987. While the City does not propose assessing you for any costs associated with this project, the Council would like to hear any of your comments or concerns since you are located within the proposed construction area and may be affected by temporary construction easements and/ or inconvenienced by construction activity. Enclosed you will find a sketch plan showing the concept plan of construction that will be discussed at this public hearing. If you have any questions regarding the proposed alignments, location, scheduling, etc., please try to have a representative attend the meeting of July 15, 1986 when all these items will be discussed in detail. Sincerely, Public Works Department/ TAC/dk Enclosures q THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Twenty OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES F. Public Hearing to Consider Elimination of Limit on Number of Off -Sale Liquor Licenses Within the City --At the June 17 City Council meeting, specific direction was given to the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses that are issued in other communities that do not restrict the number of off -sale liquor licenses issued. The City Clerk's office was asked to prepare a response to the City Council direction For a copy of the directive and response, refer to pages -,7/ --through Also enclosed on pages through�are letters from two (2) residents addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding, their position on changing the off -sale liquor license ordinance. There are two (2) alternatives being given consideration by the City Council for the regulation of off -sale liquor licenses. The first alternative is to limit the number of off -sale liquor licenses at five (5) and further that those licenses would be issued at the discretion of the City Council within established geographic boundary guidelines. The number of off -sale liquor .------licenses could only be changed in the future by ordinance amendment. The second alternative is to eliminate the number of off -sale liquor licenses within the City. If this alternate is given consideration, the City Council has discretion to attach certain regulatory guidelines. The City Council could adopt one or several of the following guidelines: 1) specific geographic boundaries, 2) each community shopping center and/or sub -regional center will be allowed on off -sale liquor license, 3) a distance factor such as one-half or one mile between off -sale liquor store establishments, 4) so many licenses per population (our current population is approximately 35,500). With five (5) licenses, the ratio is one (1) license per 7,000 people. 5) a per license ratio based on household units (our current number of household units is 12,500. The current ratio based on five licenses is one license per 2,500 households. Mr. Dave Perrier asked that research he has compiled be submitted for review by the City Council. Enclosed on pages%% through is a copy of Mr. Perrier's information. -'-T ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To 1) amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance by removing the limit of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted in the City and, further, consider certain •regulations if the cap is lifted, or 2) decide to not amend the off -sale liquor license ordinance and keep the off -sale liquor license number at five (5). MEMO TO: DIRECTOR OF FINANCE VANOVERBEKE ® FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JUNE 24, 1986 SUBJECT: OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE STUDY At the June 17 City Council meeting, any further consideration to remove the ceiling or cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses available for issuance was continued until the July 15 City Council meeting. The purpose for continuing this item was to allow the City staff to compile and review regulatory provisions, restrictions and other data pertinent to off -sale liquor licenses if the caps are removed. Please arrange to have a study compiled that would address the following issues: 1. What are the restrictions enforced in other cities if there is no cap on the number of off -sale liquor licenses that are issued? 2. Are there control factors such as distance from schools or churches? 3. Provide any demographic information that might be helpful for the review of off -sale liquor licenses. • Information was recently compiled by Federal Land Company that might be helpful as you prepare this study. In addition to the aforementioned questions, I would like you to ask for copies of city ordinances and review with city clerks the limit of control enforced by a city council if caps are removed on the number of off -sale liquor licenses. City Administrato ' TLH/kf • -71 pFG-SA�� L�Quo�2 TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES! :FINANCE DIRECTOR VAN OVERBEKE FROM:ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT DATE:JULY 7, 1986 SUBJ:OFF SALE LIQUOR LICENSES Staff has reviewed off -sale liquor licensing practices in other metro area communities, the state licensing law and demographic information pertinent to off -sale licensing. Findings of that review are as follows: I. Restrictions in other cities. A.Eight suburban communities which have not set number limits on off -sale licenses were contacted. 1. Bloomington (81,831 pop. (1980) has 25 active licenses and sets no restrictions other than zoning. The liquor stores must be located in commercial areas. The City Clerk noted that many liquor stores are located on Lyndale Ave. and that several of these had been in business for many years. 2. Burnsville (35,674) has eight active licenses. Their City Code states that the liquor store must be in a free standing building and cannot be located within one mile of one another. 3. Golden Valley (22,775) has had eight active licenses for several years. The City does not allow an off -sale business in an on -sale .:.operation, but it is okay to locate in a strip shopping mall. 4. Inver Grove Heights( 17,171) has seven off -sale establishments and there are no specific requirements. There are several stores along Concord".Street, some directly across from one another, that have been co -existing for years. 5. Maple Grove (20,525) has four active off -sale liquor stores, all operating in shopping mall locations. There have been no.complaints about the system as it currently operates, but Maple Grove does plan to review their entire liquor ordinance in the near future. (Maple Grove's population is now 30,000, which closely patterns Eagan's growth.) 6. Plymouth (31,615) has eleven licenses which the clerk felt was a reasonable number for the approximately 40,000 residents.(1986 est.) The only restriction is there be.no liquor store within 300' of any school, church or residential zone. 7. St. Louis Park (42,931) has nine licenses with no restrictions on locations other than zoning. The council may caution against lo- cating near another liquor store as not being prudent, but there is no law against doing so. ® 8. Shoreview (17,300) has four licenses. The population has since increased to 22,000 but there have been no requests for additional licenses. v B. The people responsible for licensing in_ the eight communities generally agreed that.the market essentially sets the number of licenses. These_ cities have had few requests beyond the number of licenses already active. It is within the Council's perogative to request that the applicant undertake a market .study in order.to gauge the proposed liquor store's chances for success. II. Control factors. State statute MS340.413 does not allow a liquor store within 300' of a school or a church. There are no state restrictions regarding the number of licenses per population as is the case with on -sale licenses. III. Demographics A. Zones where off -sale liquor is allowed is shown on the attached map. Off -sale is a permitted use in retail shopping centers of Neighborhood Business (NB), Community ShoppingCenter(CSC) and . Regional Shopping Center (RSC) districts. It is.a conditional use in a General Business (GB) District. ® There are P.U.D.s with underlying zoning which allow off -sale liquor. Actual development is not in keeping with the underlying zoning de- creasing the possibility that a retail shopping center will be constructed. B.The revised Geographic Boundaries, for off -sale licenses which were ,approved July 16, 1985, are also shown. The Council approved two licenses in the southwest area, one in.the southeast and one in the north. The Council approved an additional license for the north central area on May 6, 1986. C.Approved sites for off -sale liquor stores are indicated by stars. %3 0 iA L N 0 APft Y/ll %%iiiy/ 1 p •� v n t Q � � s I• a.'�'"� I T Y O F E A G A N - OFF SALE LIQUOR �g Zones where offz�sale liquor is an allowable use. - Five zpproved sites (Outlined zones indicate a F.U.D. with appropriate underlying zoning.) 7� EMM Geographic boundaries for off -sale liquor licenses approved 7/16/85. 0 July 2, 1986 Holly Sperr 4448 Johnny Cake Ridge Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 Mayor Bea Blomquist Members of the City Council City of Eagan, Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and Council Members: I would like to go on record as being strongly opposed to the changing of the off -sale liquor licensing ordinances within the City of Eagan. I do not want the City of Eagan to look like, for instance, Lyndale Avenue in Bloomington where there is off -sale liquor establishment upon off -sale liquor establishment. For this governing body to say they will regulate,even with unlimited numbers available for purchase,is opening up the City for ® lawsuits should there be denial of the license request. I was employed by the City of St. - Paul Licensing Division for 7 years. I speak from experience when I relate the following. To stipulate in this proposed ordinance the restrictions such as churches, schools, residential areas, etc., is not sufficient, you are "opening up a can of worms". Lawsuits will cost money to us taxpayers. Zoning laws can be changed and that will serve as a potential problem. My main concern with this ordinance,, again speaking from experience, is that you will, be cutting the throats of the small business people that currently hold these licenses.. It is a very difficult business to be in and by adopting this proposed ordinance you are going to make in almost impossible for the small business person to operate in our City. Please do not do that - they have cared enough to open up establishments and to run them as best they can and do not need chain liquor stores that can afford to run them out.of business and then make their profit. Our City should care about the small business person and not do this to them - or to us, the taxpayers. Sincerely, 6G�® Holly perr Please submit this letter as part of the record at the Council Meeting/Hearing to be held on July 16, 1986. Thank you. 7� ® Easter Lutheran Church James P. Borgschatz, Pastor Thomas H. Johnson, Pastor July 1, 1986 City Council of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Council Members: 4200 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55123 (612)452-5200 AL 2 1986 I recently read about the discussions concerning liquor licenses in Eagan. I oppose the "free market" approach to granting liquor licenses because it is not responsible and will predictably lead to instability in the ® community with stores starting and then going out of business. It will also lead to greater financial pressures on the smaller stores which will result in the greater access of liquor to minors. I am not opposed to liquor stores. And I agree that the current system is cumbersome and time-consuming as Mr. Smith indicated. I urge the Council to adopt an ordinance plan for the number of liquor stores that is tied to the population (perhaps to numbers of households). To reduce the unfair aspects of the "free market" approach, a minimum distance between stores could also be pursued. Several persons in this congregation have similarly expressed their views. Government need not abandon responsibility and good planning in order to satisfy the principles of the "free market." Government is also charged with the responsibility of seeking the "greatest good for the greatest number." And thank you for your many hours of public service in making Eagan not just a good place to live, but an exceptionally good place to live. Sincerely, James P. Borgschatz s � ® JPB/kkp 74 • Highlighted in yellow is a supplement to Federal Land's "Off Sale License Information" that they have submitted. Please note there are restrictions to many of these City's liquor policies that have not been included in this information. Such as distance restriction between stores like Burnsville, Arden }fills, Minneapolis. Also, population regulations in some cities such as Cottage Grove, St. Paul and Minneapolis. There are some cities who have both of these restrictions, like Minneapolis. We have also filled in the column "No. of Persons Per License" for the Municipal stores. This information should not have been omitted because the stores are city owned. This still tells us how many stores are serving a particular area..for comparison. In calling and talking with many of these "No Limit" communities, many of the City's employees have stated that eventhough their policy reads "No Limit", every potential license must go in front or the City Council for an approval or disapproval, "becoming a timely and ® costly procedure" Addressing concerns regarding "Constitutional Rights of the Free Enterprise System", The liquor Industry cannot be compared to other retail stores. This industry has many more controls and restrictions placed on them by the Federal, State and Local Governments. No other retail business in taxed as high (8.59,) an now a proposed hike of 7% by the end of the year, no other industry is required to pay all there distributors in 30 days or be shutdown from any wholesaler being able to sell to them. No other business carries the added responsbility to the community not to sell to. teenagers and intoxicated individuals that drive our streets. We do need a policy in Eagan, but not one that opens up the industry for anyone to come in and sell. The communities that have this policy put it in force many years ago when the industry had little regulations and there was not nearly the emphasis on liquor control. We need a policy with a one -mile minimum distance requirement and also based on population. This would allow the City to expand the number of off -sale liquor stores in the community as the population grows, while insuring a controlled liquor environment. Dave and Pat Perrier is I C� OFF SALE -LIQUOR LICENSE INFORMATION CITY POPULATION* NO. AUTHORIZED NO. ISSUED NO. PERSONS PER LICENSE Apple Valley 21,818. Municipal Only 2 10,909 Arden Hills 8,012 No Limit 3 2,671 Opt, must comply with a one Bloomington 81,831 mile restriction from No Limit other stores, schools & churches) 25 3,273 CottageGrove Burnsville - One 35,674 License per 7,500 No Limit population (A1so,.a one mile restriction between stores) 8 4,459 Eden Praire 16,263 Municipal Only 2 8,131 Golden Valley .22,775 No Limit 8 2,847 Hopkins 15,336 12 8 1,917 Inv. Grv. Hts. 17,171 No Limit 6 2,862 Lake Elmo 5,296 (Council reserve the right to No Limit 2 2,648 approve or disapprove, only 2 licenses have been approved) Minneapolis 370,951 1/5,000 people 54 6,869(Also,' mile Mendota Heights Newport - Only one 3,323 licenses for the City .has been approved. No restriction.) Limit 3 1,108 Oakdale 12,123"' No Limit 3 4,041 Plymouth 31,615 No Limit' 11 2,874 Richfield 37,851 Municipal Only. 3 12,617 Robbinsdale 14,422 Municipal Only 1 14,422 St. Louis Pk. 42,931 No Limit 9 4,770 St. Paul, 2701230 1/5,000 people 58 4,659 Shoreview 17,300 No Limit 6 2,883 Stillwater 12,290 No Limit 0 1 0 12,290 (City Council W. St. Paul a roval 18,527 necessary) 8 8 2,316 Woodbury ,,,10,397 No Limit 2 5,149 (Per Council Approval, only two -licenses have been approved) *Population figares are based on the most current census figures. STUDY AS PREPARED' -BY THE STAFF LISTED OF FEDERAL LAND COMPANY,BY CONTACTING EACH •CITY ABOVE. • o --,u /7 o /)4�� '11-7 � - C? / 0 • 0 6c� � Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting • Page Twenty -One OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE/TOWN CENTRE 70 A. Off -Sale Liquor License Request for Town Centre 70 (.Curtis Johnson) --An application was submitted by Curtis Johnson and Carolyn Johnson for an off -sale liquor license at the Town Centre/ Eagan Shopping Center. At the May 6, 1986, City Council meeting, authorization was given to amend the City Code to allow a fifth off -sale liquor license for the north central portion of the City of which Town Centre 70 qualifies as a location for this license. At the May 21 City Council meeting, City Council action continued the license to allow for a public hearing and potential amendment to the off -sale liquor license that would either confirm five (5.) off -sale liquor licenses or remove the ceiling on the number of off -sale liquor licenses to be granted within the community. With the continuation of the public hearing at the June 17, 1986, meeting, this item was also continued,. If action is now taken under Item F., Public Hearings, to remove the ceiling to off -sale liquor license applications, this 'license can be given consideration. If action is taken to retain the five (5), then that ordinance amendment becomes effective changing the off -sale liquor' license maximum from four to five as acted upon -by the City Council at the May 6 meeting, • En,closed without page number is a copy of the application and police officer's report that were included with the June 17 packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor license for Curtis 0. Johnson for location at the Town Centre/Eagan Shopping Center. 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 198.6, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS B. Solid Waste Abatement Commission Appointments --A Solid Waste Abatement staff report was completed on April 1, 1986, by Admin- istrative Assistant Hoher.stein. A recommendation was included in the report to appoint a Solid' Waste Abatement Commission comprised of nine (9) members. The purpose for the Commission is to meet on an ad hoc basis as a factfinding body to explore solid waste abatement alternatives. As stated in the report "its end would be the generation of a recommended solid waste abatement strategy and policy for the City. The make-up of the Commission was proposed as follows: 1) private citizens (3), 2) refuse haulers (2), 3) small business (1), 4) large business (1), 5) local government (1), 6) public service organiza- tion (1). At the direction of the City Council, an article appeared in the May newsletter explaining the purpose of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, the recycling program of the City and also a solicitation to this commission. It was also discussed by the City Council that due to the specialized nature of the Commission, openings would be advertised' in the City newsletter as opposed to using the library of names. Since interest in serving on this commission has been limited to date and recognizing the importance of proceeding with the Solid Waste Abatement Commission, it is suggested that the size of the Commission be reduced to five for purposes of appointment. The City Council could reserve the right to expand the membership if additional citizen or business representatives are interested in serving in future months. Those persons expressing an interest in serving on the Commission are as follows: 1) Darlene Barr, private citizen, who resides at 2081 Marble Lane, 2) Larry Knutson, refuse hauler, of Knutson Rubbish Service, 3) Tom Mann, small business, who resides at 1231 Carlson Lake Lane and is the owner of the Greenskeepers business, 4) Jon Hohenstein, local government, and 5) additional business representative to be recommended by the Chamber of Commerce prior to the meeting on Tuesday. The City Administrator will be attending Solid Waste Abatement Commission meetings on behalf of the Mayor and City Council All the persons listed above have expressed interest in serving on the Commission and would accept an appointment by the City Council. A copy of a letter from Lar-ry Knutson is enclosed on page Mr. Mann and Ms. Barr have discussed their appoint- ment by t lephone. In summary, it is recommended that the Commission be organized and these appointments be made at the July 15 City Council meeting. The total number of Commission members can either remain at 9 or be reduced to a number between 5 and 9. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To consider appointments to the Solid Waste Abatement Commission and, secondly, give consideration to readjusting the number of representatives on the Commission. • • Since 1961 RUBBISH SERVICE M3 15120 CHIPPENDALE AVE., ROSEMOUNT, MN 55068 (612)423-2294 JUN 5 1986 June 3, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd P.O. Box 21-199 Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Tom, ® I would like you to know that if the Waste Abatement Management Commission is interested-in-having_a.haul- er become a member I would be very interested in that position. I LJ I believe it is important to have a representative from our industry on your Commission to help give some in- sight into the unique challenges that we would be facing. S'/,Jer ly, 7�cG1ti'�v arry Knutson President KNUTSON RUBBISH SERVICE, INC. P7 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three PLEDGE AGREEMENT & PROGRAM DOCUMENT FIRST=TIME HOMEBUYERS PROGRAM A. Approval of Pledge Agreement and Program Document for City of Eagan/HRA First -Time Homebuyers Program --During the fall of 1985, the City of Eagan. authorized the Dakota County HRA to undertake a $10,000,000 tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. Early in 1986 a request was made by. the HRA to the City of Eagan to pledge revenues from the 1980 single-family mortgage revenue bond program for the purpose of reducing costs associated with the financing and acquisition of single-family homes for each first-time homebuyer. In order to the Dakota County HRA to proceed with the bond sale, a resolution must be adopted that authorizes and directs the execution of an assign- ment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single- family mortgage revenue bond in 1980 in the amount of $300,000 to the 1986 $10,000,000tax-exempt mortgage revenue bond program. As a part of that action, the City Council is adopting the program document for the 1986 bond sale. Enclosed in each City Council packet without page number is a copy of the resolution and program • document. If any member of the City Council has questions regarding this information, please feel free to contact this office at any time, .. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a pledge agreement directing execution of an assignment agreement assigning residual revenues of the City's single-family mortgage revenue bonds, Series 1980, and authorization of the Dakota County Housing and Redevelopment Authority, 1986 Single -Family Mortgage Revenue Bond Program. M Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four WAIVER OF PLAT/B.H. GRACE CORPORATION B. Waiver of Plat ('B.H'. Grace Corporation) Duplex Lot Split --The B. H. Grace Corporation has made application for a waiver of plat to allow lot splits for duplexes located on Vienna Lane. Fo_V a copy of the Planning Department report, refer to pages through ACTION TO BE CONSSDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for the B.H. Grace Corporation for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2, and Lot 5, Block 3, Rahn Ridge Addition. R RM CITY OF EAGAN • SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: RONALD EBB (B.H. GRACE CORPORATION) LOCATION: L 1 & 2, BL 2, L 5, BL 3, RAHN RIDGE EXISTING ZONING: R-2, DOUBLE WITHIN MISSION HILLS P.D. (77-1) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 15, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 8, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting waivers of plat for 3 lots in the Rahn Ridge Addition. All 25 duplex lots meet or exceed the 15,000 S.F. per lot and the 100' width. The existing duplexs on lots 1 and 2 of block 2 and lot 5 of block 3 meet code setback requirements and have separated utilities. All three lots are served by Vienna Lane. • If approved, these waivers of plat shall be subject to all applicable code requirements. RAHN RIDGE - _ )7",, I.. • tw�r rte. _ .� \ a MANN . RN OAD a• .� .__ear. .. ..:.�_�.�_ _...-. ._��_'`�. .•. i- o4y' } .� A _W a> i . C !- - _ )7",, � • tw�r rte. mss+ ar•r'n .__ear. .. ..:.�_�.�_ _...-. ._��_'`�. .•. o4y' } f . C !- j O n - VIENNA ~'- r• )7",, LANE .__ear. .. ..:.�_�.�_ _...-. ._��_'`�. .•. VIENNA ~'- r• )7",, LANE i 10 VIENNR LANE o .)5- 9!1 9)0-f IVo•a0'3TW 11001 [5D 53.00 53.01 9u O 1 � I I I 1 1�9=." BU3$ c I [ 1532 i0'a� 5 5 GD.o9e I \\ 0 ! 5 1 j 2L 113. C� D 33 CU SL I T 35L O 55.00 G 55.00 30 II0 00 NORTH `-7.7 9z4 VIENNR LRNE 'L9j DO ED - NORTH loo 00 50.00 p� 50.00 929 0 � 1 i 22 _ y GRR `9_70.♦ 17.66I m 1 17.66 P I pD j £a�sGn9 Bui/�i n�f P 01 tI 3a *5= I 0 't4 1977 9z7s I o v o -4 o 50.00 t SO.pp 100.00 NORTH r 9 l r9? 6. VIENNR r Ou 70.94 b S ♦ ON 9510 + 0 6��o9e 5 9)05 O NN I M ER/S�i IJON � u+ Sc N T- I 3B-1 1 - 929 a 56 1 r �n 4 �J SL — O w 70,94 NORT, LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se `-7.7 9z4 VIENNR LRNE 'L9j DO ED - NORTH loo 00 50.00 p� 50.00 929 0 � 1 i 22 _ y GRR `9_70.♦ 17.66I m 1 17.66 P I pD j £a�sGn9 Bui/�i n�f P 01 tI 3a *5= I 0 't4 1977 9z7s I o v o -4 o 50.00 t SO.pp 100.00 NORTH r 9 l r9? 6. VIENNR r Ou 70.94 b S ♦ ON 9510 + 0 6��o9e 5 9)05 O NN I M ER/S�i IJON � u+ Sc N T- I 3B-1 1 - 929 a 56 1 r �n 4 �J SL — O w 70,94 NORT, LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se 100.00 NORTH r 9 l r9? 6. VIENNR r Ou 70.94 b S ♦ ON 9510 + 0 6��o9e 5 9)05 O NN I M ER/S�i IJON � u+ Sc N T- I 3B-1 1 - 929 a 56 1 r �n 4 �J SL — O w 70,94 NORT, LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se LANE � I NORTH 143.54 I 7P-60 30 o T --�In D ZI1 m o, 2 0D T 929A � I / I m mI _Ito 60 3n QI Se C� 0 Agenda Information Memo July 15,, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five AMENDMENT/DAKOTA COUNTY BANK PYLON SIGN PERMIT C. Amendment to Conditional Use Permit to Allow 25 Square Feet of Additional Signage Area for an Existing Pylon Sign for Dakota County Bank --The City has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank requesting an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center along Cliff Road. For additional in on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pagesthrough _�CL. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THISITEM: To approve or deny the amendment to the Dakota County State Bank pylon sign for additional square footage. WA ® MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM L STURM, PLANNER I DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: DAKOTA COUNTY STATE BANK SIGNAGE AMENDMENT (LOT 2, BLOCK 2, CEDAR CLIFF COMMERCIAL PARK) Staff has received a sign application from Dakota County State Bank for an additional 25 square feet of signage on their existing pylon sign located at the Cedar Cliff Shopping Centex along Cliff Road. A conditional use permit was approved for this sign on February 25, 1985 and condition 3 stated that the sign shall be no more than 20' in height and shall not exceed 70 square feet in sign area. This reader board pylon sign now has the allowable. 70 square feet per side. The additional sign should fit nicely in the remaining open area and no other signage is being requested. Typically, 125 square feet of sign area per side is permitted on pylon signs. The $2.50/S.F. sign fee has been submitted with the application. If approved, this amendment shall include this sign (2'5 S.F.) only and the 95 S.F./side will not be increased in the future. Pla ner cc: Elmer Borgschatz JLS/jeh • , 6 • T I 3 EX/ST/NG s/GN s' x /o" - i WTANT tJISH 516N� _ /1 C-T,4c F/CLE12 FRAME C D. BRonIzE) 8[ 36[ /0 I' IW LoeaY..,' -WN�TE LETtERS SIGN LAYOUT PROPbSAL SY, ATTRACTA SIGN, INC. 6407 PENN AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. 55423 57.," . r METnL F, fFF-17-1 FTM l — n-' Hiram P. of LEtt[U . FLL �� -Tewe.T 4.Gu1' A7 R89uIrSEO 'F£1UF2 cS - i WTANT tJISH 516N� _ — n-' Hiram P. of LEtt[U . FLL �� -Tewe.T 4.Gu1' A7 R89uIrSEO 'F£1UF2 cS Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Six REZONING/OVERHILL FARM 1ST ADDITION D. Rezoning (Overhill Properties, Inc.) from R-2 (Residential Double,) to R-1 (Residential Single) for Certain Lots in Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on June 24, 1986,.to consider a rezoning application submitted by Mr. David Dehler, Overhill Properties, Inc., for a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms lst Addition from R-2, Residential Double District, to R-1, Residential Single District. The Advisory Planning Commission is r_ce�ommending that the rezoning be granted. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy's enclosed on pages through. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to page(.$) X76 There is no change in parkland dedication fees proposed for this rezoning. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny the rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for certain lots within Block 2, Overhill Farm 1st Addition. 0 • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MR DAVID OEHLER, OVERHILL PROPERTIES INC LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, BLOCK 2, OVERBILL FARMS 1ST ADDITION,, SWq, SEC 25 EXISTING ZONING: R-2 - DOUBLE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 2.4, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 17, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: The application submitted is a request to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6 & 7, Block 2, Overhill Farms 1st Addition„ from°R-2, Residential Double District, to R=1, Residential Single District. COMMENTS': Presently, there are existing duplexes on- Lots 3 and 4, Block 2, Overhill Farm lst Addition. Therefore, there has been some development in this block and some continuity should be retained in this area. It appears that nothing, is • constructedeast of Block 4 through Block 7, of 'which there is a single-family home constructed .on Lot 7.. If a rezoning should occur, possibly Lots 5 through 7 could be ''rezoned to single family and continue the single-family line to Lot 4. I;t would then be suggested that Lots 1 through 4 would' then remain R-2 or duplex lots, up to where Hay Lake Road intersects with Dodd Road. This would appear to make more continuity and flow within the development versus isolating two duplex lots in this sub- division - The request would be to rezone all of the lots from R-2 to R-1 or a portion of the _lots as suggested by the staff report. Because of the rezoning requests, there are no specific conditions attached to this zoning change. -- DCR/j'j 93 • C, I N I 3 „� 4 YILNUI NILL NNF SCXWIXI - L.FE VIPF LRRFSIO( ` M �) O ya t 3 `\S� IJa e •y fi \ ���� �j wurm � 7 OVERHILL FARM FIRST ADDITION � r • • ' 1 � � l � � lY apL4eTl91/a LD:X {Y M WCN r r • ' 1 r f • \�".n! i ADY PIPs MD SY=04'r RA r j ; • , I ; • 1 i j / n;H..� l` 1 AND MARCID LT l{ilLT0.4 --•--•-r-- • • r I • ,•�J� i:p r r ♦ ``• • .i:: ./ TIMlw I Np. IOTL1, u L . - \ '1' '1 OTNY.WIO{ SNOW , a '• 1 TH! !L{I• LIu{ OP YNa i • i i ffr.r.l L' N Lt Y�Dr nIe LWIL,Irc. Ls.a1.H _- i • ; I � i.: l O Ij - NwIGIui or e0'IL'►O•{ I ' qY.n LY ;DJ ii r • I V ___�_. _-J • r I t-. .� { O — •—ACCGVJ,D .CAT o DANOTA COUNTY I • .. r r I IIY ( i 7.0� X• 1 1 I O r i F � � r \ r i �• a )•�• I II! pL.WAia wD JTUTY lA1WLX1{ \ • � � ° !03b Ac �: 1174 AL i 2 Lu a..o..H TNw \\ •' '•. D3o4 r� y IOBIAC 1 l 10 1 I \ N t 1 1 D-36 Ad. 1 f /) .1�4JOI m Pu, N wID,N w AD `(FI ,B° tyµ 411 ,472 • / ! / LD.11IT LT a{L, LMD LuW o \\V s 4 I, k ., • DSo44 i JOMM• LOT HDICA P. V •,L'1 �� ��,�I_ �_ a D 37A I:, o � .�,; v� :{ pTMl0.ML{ INDICl�T1D. o ♦ R ,{ \ s. `•I bZ AL., ° .�i a EENCH MARK - \,\4I[. ELEVATION 955.77 \ \ U .. IS •, M TN{ L.W. ODADLIJIT DODO {O10 AND GLIPP {JAD ! C..., fT/.TG r Al. W"'AY _ a ..vNTY ! �TG'!E \ PIL .M..� lHli•H!V<j��-a r�J S.." ISN PII • •• M M a 1 INCH . ep P21T SECTION 24.TZ7, FZ7 I ,IL IyT' Zvi 1t41a •r• `� Nn` i / LOC4TION1 •M APN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® preliminary plat, a variance from the parking requirements would be necessary. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of Town Centre 100 Second, Addition, consisting of Lots 1 and 2, and Outlot A for future commercial development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 1, Block 1, shall have a maximum. of 1 driveway along Denmark Avenue in line with the previously approved Burger King driveway and a maximum of 2 driveway accesses along Town Centre Dr, with the appropriate setbacks and separations, and Lot 2, Block 1, be allowed 1 access driveway onto Town Centre Drive with the appropriate separation. 2. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 3. A detailed grading and erosion control plan shall be submitted for approval by staff. 4. A detailed landscape plan and financial guarantee shall be submitted and not released until one year after completion. The landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan at the time of final plat. 5. The developer shall be responsible for a 6 foot sidewalk along Town Centre Drive. 6. The trash container shall be incorporated into the building for the ® convenience of the occupants, and aesthetics of the site. All voted yes. Mulrooney moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the variance for a reduction of 4 parking spaces based on staff recommendations regarding green space. All voted yea. OVERBILL PROPERTIES, INC. - REZONING The public hearing was then convened regarding the request of Overbill Properties, Inc. for rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 of Block 2, Overbill Farms lst Addition, located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, in the northeast quadrant of Dodd and Cliff Roads, by Chairman Harrison. City Planner Runkle introduced the request and indicated the staff's recommendation that two duplex lots remain to the west of the existing duplex lots for continuity and flow. Mr. Dave Dehler appeared indicating that Lot 1 was perhaps too small for a twin home. The Commission discussed the Comprehensive Guide which indicated that the property was designated R -II. Hall moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning of Lots 5, 6, and 7 with Lots 1 and 2 remaining as duplex lots, pursuant to staff recommendation, and due to the size of Lot 2 and the triple frontage of Lot 1. Mulrooney and Hall voted in favor; Voracek, Wilkins and Harrison voted against. ® Wilkins then moved to rezone Lots 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7, Block 2 to R-1 Single Family, Harrison seconded the motion. Harrison, Voracek and Wilkins voted in favor; Hall and Mulrooney voted against. /� 3 i Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986,,City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Seven CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK E. Conditional Use Permit (Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company - Mark Baird) for an Advertising Sign --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986, Advisory Planning Commission meeting to consider an application that was submitted by Indy Outdoor Adver- tising requesting a two- (2) sided pylon sign fronting on I-494 in the Eagandale Office Park. The APC is recommending denial. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning Department report, a copy is enclosed on pagesthroughl6;g) . Q Also enclosed on page/(9/ is a copy of a lette from Tom Davis representing Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company opposing the.proposed sign. The APC minutes are enclosed on page(s) /D 7i ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To approve or deny a condi- tional use permit for Indy Outdoor Advertising Sign Company (Mark Baird') for a two-sided pylon sign fronting on I-49'4 in the Eagandale Office Park. 1• 97 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PYLON SIGN) APPLICANT: INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY LOCATION: LOT 14, BLOCK 1, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: L1 - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 19, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPT (JIM 'STORM) APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Indy Outdoor Advertising requesting a two sided pylon. sign fronting on I-494 in the Eagandale Office Park. This sign would be located on the Vendmark lot. COMMENTS: Lot 14 is 200' wide and 445' deep. The proposed 40' tall, spot lighted sign will be located 6'0' from the eastern property line and 20' south of the,. I-494 R.O.,W. If this sign were approved, no other pylon signs on Lots 1, 12, 13, 15 and. the unp'lat'ted 6.47 acre outlot to the east would be permitted due to the lineal 1,000' requirement. The signage area would be 10'6 x 36' per side with a total area of 3'78 S.F. Code allows 250 S.F. (125/side:) and a 40' maximum height for hardship reasons when approved by the City Council. CONDITIONS: 1. Maximum height shall be determined by the City Council and recommended by the Advisory Planning Commission. 2;. The applicant shall be subject to the one time sign permit fee of $.2:5'0/S.F, qO I I 2A - TTFU - -� 11 I �• r g :J' 1 J N, = 494 990 s- ..' i �., - • � 1 i _ it yo C)4. oof J. C O. E IVor^r.. Rose[ aa< r�.�X 3 • ne.. -I• .i}n V. S� tau r - -a ® June 24, 1986 The Honorable Chairman and Members, Eagan Planning Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Re: Indy Outdoor Advertising Company Dear Madame Chairman; On your June 24 agenda, you are scheduled to consider conditional use permit for an outdoor advertising sign on property which is surrounded by our Eagandale Industrial Park. Please be advised that we at Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co., which own most of the undeveloped land within the Eagandale Industrial Park, are opposed to this proposed sign. We think the unplanned and indiscriminate location of billboard signs along the newly extended I-494 or 35E throughfares of Eagan is poor land use policy. We believe that the city should be encouraging high image, quality developments similar to what we have planned and began to implement along I-494 as opposed to the billboard signs. The ability to attract new businesses, jobs and increased tax base to the community ® mandates that you not squander away your opportunities to create what is emerging as a very appealing "front door" image for your city. Sincerely, Thomas S. Davis Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co. TSD:jo 0 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co. for an advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner. Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT is City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request, for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with 'a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to ® the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. dpi 4 U Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight PRELIMINARY PLAT & REVISED SITE PLAN/FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat & Revised Site Plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition (Sienna Corporation) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986, APC meeting to consider a revised preliminary plat for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acres and contains 68 single-family lots which deviates from the R-1 single -district lot size requirement.. The APC is rec-QMmending anDroval of the revised plan and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning- and Engineering Department report,; a copy is enclosed on pages/through 113 for your review. For a copy of the APC minutes on this item, refer to pagesthrough /96 . The original 'Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; there- fore, they have no additional recommendations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat and revised site plan for Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition. /Q3 • .• CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT - FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN APPLICANT: SIENNA CORPORATION - RODNEY HARDY LOCATION: PART OF THE SA, SEC 25 & PART OF THE NEQ OF THE SE;, SEC 26 EXISTING ZONING: R-2, LEXINGTON SOUTH PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DATE of PUBLIC HEARING': JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 18, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPT APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted to revise the site plan and preliminary plat of the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition which consists of approximately 33.7 acresand will contain 68 single-family lots which deviate from the R-1 Residential Single District lot size requirement. - ZONING & LAND USE: Presently, the parcel is zoned R-2, Mixed Residential, with a density of 3-6 dwelling units per acre under the Lexington South Planned Development agreement. This agreement was entered into by the owner of the property and the City in 1977. The Eagan Land Use Guide designates this parcel as R -I, Single Residential District, with a density of 0-3 dwelling units -per acre. Since there is a Planned Development Agreement governing the land, the Development Agreement for Lexington South Planned Development would supersede the density allowed in the Comprehensive Guide Plan. BACKGROUND: The preliminary plat, Fawn Ridge, was originally presented to the Advisory Planning Commission -and • City Council in late 1983. There was some discussion in regard to lot size and the original plan approved consisted of 93 single-family lots, which deviated from the lot size criteria, 44 twinhome lots, 88 dwelling units for a total of 181 dwelling units. The applicants ,phased this development into two phases of which the first phase has been constructed and built. The applicants are now looking at the second phase for development. In the second phase, there are 37 duplex lots and approximately 23 smaller single-family lots for a total of 97 dwelling units to be constructed. Since 1983, the applicants have changed their development concept and would like to develop the entire tract of Fawn Ridge into single lots. The revised plat carries the same circulation FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 pattern, which was approved in 1983, and deviated some of the • lot lines to correspond with their new development plan. The net reduction in the second phase of development would be 29 dwelling units. This revised preliminary plat and site plan will now carry the connotation of all single-family lots in the Fawn Ridge Addition. The lot sizes in the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition will exceed the lot size criteria in width and area. Most of the lots in the second addition have a lot width of 75' with a few lots dropping to a width of 70' at the 30' setback line. Therefore, the lots in the second addition exceed lot sizes in the first addition in both area and width. In review of this revised preliminary plat and revised site plan for the Lexington Place Planned Development, the question should be whether this is a better use of the land than what was originally approved in the Fawn Ridge preliminary plat. GRADING/ DRAINAGE: Staff has reviewed the preliminary grading plans submitted by this applicant and found it to be feasible. However, staff does have a few recommendations which the applicant should incorporate into his final grading plan. Staff recommends the applicant provide overland emergency drainage ways at all low points in the roadway. This can be • accomplished by grading a slight swale down the property lines in the area of the roadway low points. Although the applicant proposes to fill a portion of Pond LP -33, the amount is not significant and will not adversly affect the total amount of storage volume available for Pond LP -33. The net reduction. in high water area amounts to about one-tenth of an acre. This equates to a reduction of about 3.0% of the high water ponding area. In staff's opinion, this is not significant. Besides, the available storage volume for this pond is about 12 acre feet compared with the required storage volume of 8.5 acre feet. This proposed development lies within Major Drainage District L as shown on Figure 1. Based on the applicant's grading plan, - staff estimates about 75% of the drainage flows into Pond LP -33. The remaining drainage flows into Pond LP -65. LP -33 presently has an outlet to Pond LP -61. This pond is experiencing high water problems because it has no positive gravity outlet. However, Council authorized a project on June 17, 1986, providing an outlet to this pond and several other downstream ponds under Project 444R that will eliminate the high water problems. This project is scheduled for completion late this fall. UTILITIES: Staff reviewed the utility layout for this • development with the original Fawn Ridge preliminary plat application in 1983. The minor changes and revisions that the Fawn Ridge 2nd Addition proposes from the original Fawn Ridge /D5 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 preliminary plat do not result in any changes in the utility layout for this development. It is feasible to'provide sanitary sewer and wa-ter service to this lot by extending the existing utilities from the Fawn Ridge 1st Addition. Staff does recommend, however, that the applicant extend the water main from north Hay Lake Road to Cliff Road. This will allow for future connection to the City's 20" trunk water main along the north side of Cliff Road when it is installed. STREETS: Dodd Road borders this development along the east and Cliff Road borders this development along the south. Dodd Road is de,sig-nested as a City collector street. It is not currently built to its full 9 -ton 44' wide collector street status. Cliff Road is presently a two lane rural highway under the jurisdiction of the Dakota County Highway Department. Staff discussed the accesses onto Dodd Road and Cliff Road in the original engi-neer.ing report in 1983. Staff ha's no concerns regarding these accesses. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development shall be required to dedicate a 40' half right-of-way for Dodd Road and a 65' half right-of-way for Cliff Road. ® The developer shall dedicate all easements required by Code. Also, the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over all public utilities not located within public right-of-way. Lastly, the developer shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 10 AS'SESS'MENTS: The trunk area related assessments for this development have been levied. However, the future extension of the 20" trunk water line along Cliff Road will generate a lateral benefit to this proposed development. Staff recommends having this development assume the lateral benefit at this time rather than waiting until the 20" trunk water main is constructed and this development is built. In accordance with City policy regarding lateral benefit from trunk water main, staff proposes that this development is responsible for one-half its net frontage adjacent Cliff Road or approximately 620'. The 1986 rate for lateral benefit from trunk water main is $11.88 making the total estimated obligation of this development about $7,360. The final amounts will be determined by the final plat distances and the rates in effect at the time of final platting. A,11 other costs resulting from the installation of internal public streets and utilities for this development will be the sole responsibility of this development. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDN JUNE 24,, 198'6 PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hap Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40' half right-of-way and a 65' half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Road., respectively. 4. This development shall, dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20" utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPGA, MWCC, Minnesota Departmeant of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal S. public streets and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated 5-14-86: 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road,.. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. /01 • 0 m 2 -1 (YNY CO /\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION IPOND HILL /" •�T i ' 2ND ADDITION I / "\i.\\ FAWN RIDGE T Am .= I --L I '� .n•O', OVERHILI. FARM IOND NDID i \ •'• ` ADDITION F IT AA m- '3tJ ' D A IT A It y----- __ CLIFF Rr)An I...u..O..am, IY...' +o unow. CNGINEEAING "" "•' COMPANY, INC. I u . • i... 11.111 .unnal..n.E..,. 11111 n... ,.m LOCATION MAP GENERAL INFORMATION ID TOTAL ..A., =I " ...IT. ., . • ' ...[. T 31ZE ... IT. .e+un: Lo. u..Tu.c.E Ave....LOT TI.I. V .... ... I,. ALL OW ..aO.. ARE P.Iuui.A.T AND ARE .uu.CT TO Owu.e ON n+A. nAv FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATES . 13 + CLIFF LP -33 D DATA a 0 _ YPOND DATA --- - - ---- ---- -- -= - -- _-- ---------_--= PRELIMINARY ROAD ' RoeE G °"'""'"°'"°"""' GRADING DRAINAGE AND nxxxw .v ux° mrvaan < FAWN RIDGE ENGINEERIN"' EROSION CONTROL PLAN •" • ASSOCIATES COMPRNY, INC. U) • IB Ra LRiCK 20" EAGAN19.1 /,`� PARK 31. C'll 10/82.0 1020 ` _ 12` 8 0/' 5 � 1 355 /50.0 23R 237 I 1 I a6.0/ 9 .0 PARK city of eagan � PUBLIC WORKS nFPARTRAC n I 1 EL6 �rrtd�l '1. 1 /7i DAKOTA court TY 1? R K CEP cn NGr mci.uatu 14 P�HxI �� 475/63.0 50 ruGo01 lass:III ) 93.7/1004 ' �tS.lUllr� 1'71 OVERHE e 1 - - v Lr D53.1/68D 503/670 112 112,• j 6 2" 12 0 � 11] 53.7/720' ' l`—_—� -I ----= 60.9/7R0 192h 2 3) ` /24 514/65.0 9/290 180 �1. 116 '. O 6617/ 850 V 6UG GROUND STORAGE 5000 G.RAI. BOOSTER H,w. t. 1059 �1 \ �12° �I 183 _ _I X2.2 /SB.O 68.0/ o \ '1 20` 12.0' 20'4 "- _ 20• 1020 1R7 390,/`9 (1 -IR4 68.]/)9.0 � IRS .: 852/950 IBB I4 OOIE 1895/95.0 .12• 20" - u"W ....... L-�9A , 200 I I eF2 IEP. I _ 70,8/76, Cr I $$IJJPyy��TC' I6• /58 201 Ull_I 1020 26 I ���`)))�///1�II 25,_ 0 Il 02 203 aid/SB.O I \9 I 476/630 --1 010,\\ 195 190 plc >i nems _„ ? 12` 197 _ '1f R•, -• 746/870 . n I 1 EL6 �rrtd�l '1. 1 /7i DAKOTA court TY 1? R K CEP cn NGr mci.uatu 14 P�HxI �� 475/63.0 50 ruGo01 lass:III ) 93.7/1004 ' �tS.lUllr� 1'71 OVERHE e 1 - - SUBJECT PARCEL in WATER MASTER PLAN 1 R23W FIG. #3 approved: -I standarM plate #: 112 112,• a 93IGI' 0 ILIEIVH1IC __ w-7 , 12M' �9� I MAROTZ'E- —� -I ----= 60.9/7R0 192h - SUBJECT PARCEL in WATER MASTER PLAN 1 R23W FIG. #3 approved: -I standarM plate #: 49 `- 70 •0 8.7 83GJ 1� 8306 PdFICn Page • I Irp.:o� LP 4 It 4II `A M1r.1n n1u_ P_ 1 000.e J_o � tltlJ.9 N e1L 5.-17 / J81523%/JP-23 -.- --`-- 890.0/ee \ ". 852.2 3 ' `'��������jjjjlllll \'a., 2 / 8519 a4--- � �`T9• r '. JP -391-"' J,J-r /� /i. JP -25 6890I • JP -53 ��(1 JP- 2 817.0 I ��..-. 189, AO 8604 \ 8400 'rN �' 824.0 I Vol JP -29 926,0•�I L S -IS 945.0 �� JP -27 _ IJP -26 9040 1806.0 -i- 824.0 _ IIJ I O. -51 t ' city of eagan PUBLIC $ � WORKS DEPARTME ................ ................ ............ .... ............ .... SUBJECT PARCEL n 9 STORM SEWER - //v MASTER PLAN FIG. -*1 approved: standard - plate #: 91 LP -47 90080 8,,, LP -30 9 29/06 O9 Q A9060 ° 9/50 915 LP -26 J;I 910.7 9/50 'q .A / 92207 925.4 ' 'I I Luc FIG. -*1 approved: standard - plate #: ,�--� LEGAL DESCRIPTION 'voNn NILS 2ND ADOMOY I FAWN RIDGE �y-I —J 1 L Iz \ \ /10 �`'--- 1 •� /� r"OII • .w- `—_It OVERH:I.I. FARM POND ROAD I `� ✓' ` �� ADDITION \ � 11 ~1 I � �� '• - w./ Al < ER' � /�\ .�/ LOCATION MAP o GENERAL INFORMATION e.uTnG Eon I'D. TOTAL SINGLE Fuov LOIS: ED 1 J o•ou AN N 11.11 LUES LARGEST LOT SIZE ...... EG.... 1 E �1GA. SO I. SMALLEST LOT LITE: 1.11110. IT. DENSITY: E.O1 ONIT.IACRE AVERAGE LOT EIEE: I..... SO- EE. ALL Ory .N•IGN1 ARE IRELMMNUY AND ARE mu1CT TO CAYIGE ON FINAL nm` Lo TIO vo `- %..INA' ------ _CLIFF RbAD---- W J 061w mNN... m4 mlrnoll ....« ..'........... IGINEEHING "'I"" "" I. I. COMPANY• INC. COD ..L. .. A. ....... EPNTml1-.1-1... 11111 wl ... 1000 FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT ANIAND TOM, FAWN RIDGE ASSOCIATE, ll 3 -ham _ n• _' .. 91T � APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • INDY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Harrison next convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Indy Outdoor Advertising Co. for an ,advertising sign on Lot 14, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the project, described the size of the advertising sign, and reviewed the report, indicating the 1,000 foot distance limitation on advertising signs. Mr. Mark Baird, on behalf of the applicant, was present to discuss the proposal. A letter was received and read by Bob Worthington on behalf of Opus Corporation and Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Companies, indicating'their opposition to the advertising sign, and indicating a need for a uniform policy relative to billboards along freeways. It was indicated that the 378 square foot sign exceeded the 250 square foot ordinance limitation. Comments regarding the appropriateness of billboard signs, the previous denial of the request, the excessive size of the sign, and the need for a uniform plan such as Town Centre 70 and 100. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of thee conditional use permit. All voted affirmatively. E -Z AIR PARK - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Planner Runkle indicated that the applicant had requested a ® continuance of this issue due to the need to resolve certain conditions with staff. Appearances were made by neighboring land owners with some questions and some objections relative to traffic and lighting. Mulrooney moved, Harrison seconded the motion to postpone the request. All voted in favor. FAWN RIDGE 2ND ADDITION - SIENNA CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT S REVISED SITE PLAN The public hearing was convened by Chairman Harrison in regard to the request for a revised preliminary plat and site plan consisting of 69 single family lots on approximately 34 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 25, west of Dodd Road and north of Cliff Road. Dale Runkle explained that the proposal was a revised preliminary plan and site plan for Phase 2 of Fawn Ridge Addition, which previously included 37 duplex lots and 23 smaller single family lots. The plan resulted in the exclusion of any duplex lots and a reduction of dwelling units from 97 to 69. Mr. Rod Hardy appeared on behalf of the developer. Yvonne Renoda and Gary Pietig of the Oak Ponds Addition, directly west of Fawn Ridge, commented on the lot size relative to the size of the lots in their development. It was indicated that the development was part of a planned unit development which previously included the smallest lot being 9,125 square feet with a 65 foot width, with the smallest lot now being 9,153 square feet with a 67 foot width. The median size had increased significantly. Wilkins moved, Hall seconded the motion to ® recommend approval of the revised preliminary plat and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. The final grading/drainage plan shall include emergency overflow swales at all street low points. /Y�/ 4 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Roads, respectively_.. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets • and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING b COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to ® commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary plat on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, 5 U • Agenda Information July 15, 1986, City Page Twenty -Nine Memo Council Meeting COMPRI HOTEL G.' Preliminary Plat & Conditional Use Permit for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition (Opus Corporation) for a 6 Story, 190 Room Hotel and Future Restaurant and Rezoning from GB & LI to Commercial Planned Development and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment --A public hearing was 'held at the June 24, 1986, APC meeting to consider three (.3) applications submitted by the Opus Corporation for a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a 6 story, "Compri Hotel.." The City staff initiated a comprehensive guide plan amendment as a part of the application process for considering this application. The APC did recommend approval of the four applications as presented. For a copy of the Planning and Engineering report, refer to pages 1/through �2 For a copy of the action that was taken by the A,PC, refer to those minutes found on pages 17,E through /30 . The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the 1986 rate for the commercial and industrial park land dedication fee and a trailway.on Pilot Knob Road. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: rezoning from GB & LI to commercial comprehensive guide plan amendment, 3) and 4.) a conditional use permit. 116 To approve or deny 1) the planned development, 2) preliminary plat approval, CITY OF EAGAN • SUBJECT: REZONING/PRELIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION - COMPRI HOTEL LOCATION: LOTS 1,2,3, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE IND. PARR #1 AND OUTLOT A EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK EXISTING ZONING: GB (GENERAL BUSINESS), LI (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 24 JUNE, 1986 DATE OF, REPORT: 13 JUNE, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND APPLICATIONS: Three separate applications have been submitted by Opus Corporation requesting a Rezoning, Preliminary Plat and Conditional Use Permit for a six story "Compri Hotel". The plat will consist of 2 lots with the second lot a proposed restaurant facility. This 7 acre site will require rezoning from GB (General Business) and L-1 (Light Industrial) to a commercial planned development on lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 in the Eagandale Industrial Park No. 1 and Outlot A in the Eagandale Office Park. The site abuts Pilot Knob Road to the west, Corporate Center Drive on the south and the new 5 story Sperry Corp. Building to the northeast. This Rezoning and Preliminary Plat will require a comprehensive guide plan amendment. COMPRI HOTEL: The proposed 6 story (70' tall) 190 room hotel will be the first hotel along the 494 corridor in Eagan. Compri Hotels contain only first class guest rooms and amenities are limited. No large scale meeting rooms are proposed and restaurant facilities will be provided for guests only. Since the building is over 3 stories, a Conditional Use Permit will be required. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) will also require the hotel to have an interior noise level of 50 decibels or less. An application for a restaurant liquor license will be submitted to the City in the near future. The architectural styling of the hotel will attempt to blend with the Sperry Building that is nearing completion. The brick and •glass exterior will be accented by the tinted glass stair tower and canopied entries'. The brick trash enclosure on the western side of the building will be accessed by a service drive and .employee parking area. Additional plant material along with the existing oaks will screen this portion of the site. //7 COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 2 Access to the hotel will be from a lines up with Corporate Center Drive in front of the hotel to a canopied the building. PARKING AND STORAGE separated entry drive that This entry drive will loop entrance on the east side of City Code requires one (1') parking stall per dwelling room and one (.1) additional space for each eight (8) units. This would' require ,214 stalls for the hotel alone. Due to the proximity of the airport and that the restaurant facilities within the hotel are private, fewer parking stalls are being proposed. 110 10' X 20' stalls ('9' X 20' employee) are shown on the site plan. No pylon signs are proposed. The main signage will be building mounted on the stair towers. Code requires: 1) That no more than one (1) business sign for each major street frontage shall be permitted on a building for each business located within such building. 2) All business signs mounted on a building shall be similar in design. 3') No signs or combination of signs mountedupon a building shall cover in excess of ,208 of the gross area of s,ide. 4) The signage shall not project more than 10" from the vertical surface of the building. LANDSCAPING': A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and special care will be used to save as many of the existing oaks as the site plan allows. Additional plant material along Corporate Center Drive similar to that in the Eagandale Office Park (Pilot Knob Road and Avalon Ave). All 3:1 slopes and the twin 6' retaining wall areas will need careful landscape plant material selection. The 2:1 slopes will require "ground covers" to stabilize the slopes and to provide for little or no maintenance. LOT 2: This proposed restaurant facility isnot scheduled for construction until the hotel is near completion/or completed. Although the lot will be platted, Opus Corporation will submit site plans to the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council for review and approval prior to the Issuance of the 'building permit. The Code requires one (1) parking stall for each three (3) seats based on the capacity of the restaurant. 79 10' x 20' stalls are proposed thus enabling an approx. 240 seat Class 1 (sit down) restaurant to be built on this lot. The restaurant will have a separate vehicular entry of its own and can share the access to the hotel if so needed. Ile • • COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 3 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The grading proposed on the preliminary grading plan is feasible. It will require two 6 ft. high terraced retaining walls northeasterly of the proposed hotel building. These are required due to the large natural ravine running down the easterly property line of this proposed development. These retaining walls will allow the developer to grade to 3:1 slopes. The 3:1 slopes appear to be the steepest slopes proposed over this development. These slopes are the minimum allowed for maintenance. The natural topography slopes to the north and the proposed grading plan does not change any of that. This development lies within the center of Major Drainage District H, as shown on Figure 1. The developer is proposing some internal storm sewer to collect runoff from the parking lots and directed into a City trunk line located along this development's easterly property line. This line flows into the City's trunk line located adjacent I-494, which eventually ends up into the Minnesota River Valley. The 54" trunk line connects with a 27" trunk line from Pilot Knob Road at Pond HP -3 as shown on Figure 1. However, recent study of the Eagandale Center. Industrial Park area indicates that the capacity of the 54" pipe cannot be exceeded due to flow restrictions upstream. Therefore, Pond -HP -3 does not appear to be necessary. The applicant's engineer is preparing 'a revision to the Master Plan for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park area to handle the storm water runoff by adding additional upstream ponding areas. As a result, staff has no concerns with the encroachment into the ponding area HP -3 as shown on the grading plan. This project will not require any trunk storm sewer improvements on behalf of the City. UTILITIES: According to City record plans„ sanitary sewer and water services were ,extended to Lots 2 and 3 of the Eagandale Center Industr-ial Park. The water service was a 2" diameter line and the sanitary sewer service was a 6"diameter line. Both appear to be at elevations that will suit the proposed building sites. In lieu of this, staff questions the necessity for the separate sanitary sewer line proposed by the developer. Because this line connects to an MWCC collector, the developer will have to obtain the necessary per to connect into this line. Also, because this proposed sanitary sewer connects two lots, it would have to be turned over to the City with an easement dedicated over the line. Staff recommends using the existing sanitary sewer services if possible. The disadvantages of the proposed sanitary sewer line include: 1. MWCC connection permit required. 2. Access for maintenance more difficult than the existing sewer within Corporate Center Drive. This development will not require any extension of any City trunk water or sanitary sewer lines. COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 4 STREETS: Corporate Center Drive and Pilot Knob Road abut the southerly and westerly portions of this proposed development. • Pilot Knob Road is under the jurisdiction of Dakota County with controlled access. Corporate Center Drive is a collector street for the Industrial Park. Neither roadway will require any upgrading as a result of this development with the exception of possible signalization when traffic warrants it. It is presently being discussed as a part of the County Highway 5 -year Capital Improvement Program. The applicant's grading plan shows the primary driveway to this development lining up with Corporate Center Curve which is necessitated by the potential high traffic volume associated with this proposed development. Staff estimates the hotel would generate about 2,000 trips per day based upon full occupancy. The miniumum throat widths for each driveway access shall be 30'. The separation between driveways is 200' which is the minimum separation staff would recommend on a collector street such as Corporate Center Drive. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development will not be responsible for dedicating any additional street right-of-way because the City has already obtained the necessary right-of-way through previous platting. - This development shall dedicate a 20' utility easement adjacent the Corporate Center Drive property line. The remaining easements shall be dedicated in accordance with City Code. Staff • recommends the developer dedicate a 10' utility easement lying southwesterly of the easterly property line. The existing easement is too narrow to reasonably perform any repairs to the sewer line which may be necessary. If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer shall dedicate a 20' utility easement over the portion of sanitary sewer line designated as a City line. PERMITS: If the developer cannot use the existing sanitary sewer services and must build a new sanitary sewer line, then the developer will be responsible for the following permits: 1. MPCA sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC connection permit. All trunk area assessments have been levied. • / -;,-o COMPRI HOTEL PAGE 5 CON^ITIONS ® 1) All standard platting, rezoning procedures be adhered to. 2) This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. L� 3) All signage code requirements be adhered to. 4) The trash area,, perimeter park-ing be screened from public streets. 5') A detailed landscape plan be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plant materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the installation. 6) The total number of parking stalls be approved as the site plan demonstrates. 7) A separate liquor license be issued for the hotel's restaurant. 81) Lot 2 be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9) The plat be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10) The main access drive to this site line up with Corporate Center Curve 11) The two accesses into this development be separated by a minimum of 200' and be a minimum of 30'' wide. 12) A 20' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent the Corporate Center Drive right-of-way. 13') A 10'utility easement be dedicated adjacent the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14') This development will be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. %-kl 0 0 n U ��Y moaned Fir 1 ( SEUyD 27 4v>y ]s qs 1 ;r` 2 3. � ]. I EAGANDUE BJSINE55 U.MPUS 6 T .• NEW ICJl1AND DNrsIaN DF SPERRY MND YrEvf M ue I� AMERICA! 10 PRPRUR E pDUCE U 1S SI ^� 26 S D Pj 1 '1 MINNESOTA H*HWAY RAN SV6 oTO CNANGE. I i ea '! LE K. 55 1T17 IS . ,E */(� VILLAUME- LEA TON Bo%A y - If 51ANDARD LUMBER p1.10T. L'ARSON WAREN WSE '. •'.: �'L' F =�P PIRIE SCOTT ROADWAY EXPRESS - 12; �Z ICJN 7 _Lx`. ST 651 ]2 22 ECONOMICS 1, E - - - UBORATORY �. _l•� nnmeR 1 ••• - : 1 � 9 28 11 L u a 24 s� ]M COMPANY r ..rr CORPORATE THE DONALDSON L . I^... SQUARE COMPANY U.S. POSTAL SERYIOE - BULK MAIL I CENTER v KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS I6 wme NmEb/p. K p. Uo+wM t 4mRn 23 x3. r.m �M..m snea a E..{vmuvTwV x. A'r+x' k.I. foT.q n wux �r sem.. •� w-•w..E xx GV..uL SY.r. EP9+l K. LEMv V+E usAl fNx6 �fe LEMAN LAKE r/I A.,C MINNESOTA H*HWAY RAN SV6 oTO CNANGE. I i ea '! LE K. 55 1T17 IS . ,E */(� VILLAUME- LEA TON Bo%A y - If 51ANDARD LUMBER p1.10T. L'ARSON WAREN WSE '. •'.: �'L' F =�P PIRIE SCOTT ROADWAY EXPRESS - 12; �Z ICJN 7 _Lx`. ST 651 ]2 22 ECONOMICS 1, E - - - UBORATORY �. _l•� nnmeR 1 ••• - : 1 � 9 28 11 L u a 24 s� ]M COMPANY r ..rr CORPORATE THE DONALDSON L . I^... SQUARE COMPANY U.S. POSTAL SERYIOE - BULK MAIL I CENTER v KEY TO OTHER OCCUPANTS I6 wme NmEb/p. K p. Uo+wM t 4mRn 23 x3. r.m �M..m snea a E..{vmuvTwV x. A'r+x' k.I. foT.q n wux �r sem.. •� w-•w..E xx GV..uL SY.r. EP9+l K. EAGANDALE CENTER N SCALE 1"-6W' FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION 0 6 n 14 1 BUILDING BUILDIG LEMER RE 25• 16 E Y VEA DRUG LRLN) xl- x.. EAGANDALE CENTER N SCALE 1"-6W' FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT OPUS CORPORATION • • i CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE — - - Plant Legend I SHADE TREES - 2 1/2' eel. BB SIG 7UTVYN PURPLE ASH, DREENe PIKE LINDEN, .N[v PPREFTY L1HCy MARSHALL'S ASN, SUGAR MAPLE ' yyt• p�. r / j j 7 I '' � - O FLOWERING TREES - 1 1/2' cel. BB CRABAPPLE, JAPANESE TREE LILAC, 1 �/ �!A _ y,♦ SEP VIC ESERRI, 1YVR MAPLE i' f� • - �- /. / �. f4 _ � �,,,y` CONIFER TREES - 6111. BB 1 `� / / 1, . L•� , COLORADO SPRUCE, AUSTRIAN PINE ? 1 % I �" i /� i LI ♦ EVERGREEN SHRUBS - 24' dia. cont. JUNIPER, YEW �. j�. i/ / � �c� n��' �y,;f.,,♦ / LAWN &.I' .�14 EXISTING TREES '1 'f r r ! 6 ox /�t s ✓moi L ` w\ORANT� CORPORATE CENTER DRIVE 14.0/ F- MENDOTA HTS -2. FP -14 8 8 //)H -b AjAl DALE! 285 3 —T rw? 443.5 II 0 Fw, Go H -C ..ILO 54 FP - 632. 8 H -k' Pin 3 4 9., IF 47� WT r"ll K 7 -9 F -d IN, I �7 HP; 7 /DP -12 0 D7b :894 56' L T I Umkj 1', 8 1 �j 0.11: E cr DPml 68 r, UINCEn 659.3 7 J I'�-h `)STRIAL P" R K NO le" I 1 866.0 'T , ;/, -q r ; i -, , I E -s I E, E-fLONE 0 DP 15 k — , — - —­[_, �� 4" 30.24 tl , 876. 24 -9 A 12 878, -C D c D d 0/0"' IN, DP61,7 %rALE Pm2, E-. 8D 2: 0 74. 72 .80 p 87, IF eq. .7 DP -19 i J� I.//:C j '89"Hos c OP -3 E CP 4 OP 14'. 860 0 871 7 L 0 827 7 875,0 .50 87,8.0 DP -13 DP 27 884, 874.6 -61 1\1, 8781 0 ()p DP -1 I '57 3 8560 CP35 t I , . -- I , 5 "' 682842. WIN L.S.-4 RX 3 C p C 8 7 0 8 4 850 866.5 1 864.4 �gt 875. FO[ CP O� i -5 /Q J.E PG 3 7 2. 855 877.2 79�10 OP -26 DP - 4 --t8 / / �q 874,88 L.S.-7 a 74 /8 8 9 1� ! CP -2 7 . 8.1 — D-, - 823.5 ji DP- O� Ir Y RP /�4 : I 30- 7 L F City of leag OPUBLIC WORKS DEPART SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. +1 stand approve . t. ard- �6-1 �ppsllate # : ° _ _..... _.. . ° . a --- -- - . I i °a r a °u m IL 0 •�wrF �� .. u✓hn ' { r pIar�r�.e • ' 1 li W fV r .�. W •� w .AI � • •I � 31 � bl `1 1 I•w w rr fwfw• Pr ' F ' I Driveway relocated to line up-with Corporate Center Dr _ ��� APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • 2. The water main shall be extended from North Hay Lake Road to the Cliff Road property line. 3. A 40 foot half right-of-way and a 65 foot half right-of-way shall be dedicated for Dodd and Cliff Roads, respectively_.. 4. This development shall dedicate the appropriate ponding easements over Pond LP -33 and Pond LP -65. 5. This development shall dedicate a. minimum 20 foot utility easement over all public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. 6. The right-of-way at all street intersections shall contain a 20 foot radius. 7. This development shall be responsible for a lateral benefit assessment from future trunk water main along Cliff Road at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits/approvals from MPCA, MWCC, Minnesota Department of Health, and Dakota County Highway Department. 9. All costs associated with the installation of internal public streets ® and utilities shall be the sole responsibility of this proposed development. 10. The plat should be reviewed by the Dakota County Plat Commission because the plat abuts County road right-of-way. 11. The deviation from the standard lot size requirements shall be approved for the plan dated May 14, 1986. 12. The plat shall be subject to the Park Commission's review for trail requirements along County Road 32 and Dodd Road. 13. All standard plat conditions shall be required for this development. All voted in favor, with Mulrooney specifically stating to the record that his vote was based only on the fact that the proposal was an improvement over the earlier plan. EAGANDALE OFFICE PARR 4TH ADDITION - OPUS CORPORATION PRELIMINARY PLAT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REZONING 6 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT Chairman Harrison convened the hearing based upon the request by Opus Corporation regarding a six -story, 190 room hotel and future restaurant on approximately 7 acres requiring rezoning from GB (General Business) to ® commercial planned development, a comprehensive guide amendment, a conditional use permit for a 6 -story building, and preliminary 'plat on Lots 1, 2, and;3;, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Outlot A, Eagandale Office Park, %Z� 5 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, and southeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive. It was pointed out by Chairman Harrison that the request actually was for four separate applications. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that proof of parking had been agreed upon. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus Corporation in addition to Tom Gaffney of Prism Hotels. An- historical _presentation was provided in addition to a description of the proposed Compri Hotel. It was indicated that the proposed six -story hotel would actually be 20 feet lower than the existing Sperry building. The builder's architect was present to describe the plan, including berms and _sound abatement methods. Member Mulrooney indicated that the project and application should be considered as a whole in consideration of its b6ing in the nature of a planned development. Mulrooney then moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, conditional use permit, rezoning, and comprehensive guide amendment, subject to the following conditions where applicable to each of the requests: 1. All standard platting and rezoning procedures shall be adhered to. 2. This project shall be subject to a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment. 3. All signage code requirements shall be adhered to. ® 4. The trash area, perimeter parking shall be screened from public streets. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted with emphasis on saving the existing oaks and providing ground cover plan materials on all 2:1 - 3:1 slopes. The plan will be bonded and not released until one year after the. installation. 6. The total number of parking stalls shall be approved as the site plan demonstrates. 7. A separate liquor license shall be issued for the hotel's restaurant. B. Lot 2 shall be subject to site plan review by the Advisory Planning Commission and City Council. 9. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission recommendations and the Parks dedication fee. 10. The main access drive to this site shall line up with Corporate Center Curve. 11. The two accesses into this development shall be separated by a minimum of 200 feet and be a minimum of 30 feet wide. is 12.' A 20 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the Corporate Centre Drive right-of-way. 0 C` J C APC Minutes June 24, 1986 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning, to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. /Y1 Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT & REZONING FOR CHATTERTON PONDS H. Preliminary Plat for Chatterton Ponds Consisting of 26 Single Family Lots on 19.6 Acres and Rezoning from A to R -1--A public hearing was held at the last regular meeting of the APC to consider two (2) applications submitted by Robert Engstrom for a rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat entitled Chatterton Ponds. The APC is recommending approval of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information, refer to the Plan- ning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages 37Y through /f!0 For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page (s) _iV1 -JA47i. The recommendations of the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission are enclosed on page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-1 and preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. • • • I-1 LJ 11 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT "CHATTERTON PONDS" APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM LOCATION: SW 4, SECTION 22 EXISTING ZONING: A. AGRICULTURAL DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 10, 1986 PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS: Two separate applications have been submitted re- questing a rezoning from an Agricultural to R-1 (single family) district and a preliminary plat for "Chatterton Ponds". This development consists of 27 new lots and an existing home site on 19.06 acres located immediately south of St. John Neumann Church. ZONING & LAND USE: The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site R-1 (single family). Five zoning districts abutt this parcel: Public Facilities (church) to the north, Agricultural west of Pilot Knob Road and to the northeast, Parks to the east, R-3 Townhouse (the "Pines") to the south and R-1 (Hilltop Estates) to the south. The existing home site, the Chatterton residence, is situated on a knoll where one side falls towards Mooney Lake. This portion of the site is a grassy openland spotted with mature oak. The Chattertons have cows in this area also. Dense understory vegeta- tion, mature trees and ponding areas cover the rest of the site. Most of these trees are hardwood species and special care should be demonstrated to save as many as possible. A rather steep slope (3:1) to Mooney lake will require erosion control attention to assure that the water quality will not be affected. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 20 lots give this project an overall density of 1.47 units per acre, well within the Code requirement of 0 - 3 units/acre. All lots exceed the 12,000 S.F. minimum and range in size from 16,500 S.F. to 42,370 S.F. Variances will be required on lots 17, 18, 21, 22, 25 and 26 to allow less than 50' of frontage at the curb line as required by Code. This will provide access to home sites in areas where roadways are not feasible. 45v CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING: A single -divided access will serve this development • from Pilot Knob Road near the center of the western property line. The original location was along the southern portion of the pond and was shifted south after a staff recommendation. By doing so, future development west of Pilot Knob Road could occur with the new streets aligning and without disturbing as much of the wooded area on that side of the road. Proposed Chatterton Road will loop to the east, south of a large ponding area and will then branch off to form two tear drop cul-de-sacs with islands. It is from these cul-de-sacs that the variance to the frontage requirements is necessary. The developer has shown building pad locations for lots 215 and 26 to ensure Code setback requirements are adhered to. This development will have an association for several reasons: 1) to maintain architectural control and unity within the project. 2') to provide maintenance in "common areas" and in the cul-de-sac islands. 3) to have trash removal on a single, scheduled basis. 4.) possibly for snow clearing. COMMENTS: The developer has met with the Parks Department several times to discuss parks issues and dedication requirements_ An existing trail on the south side of Mooney Lake will be connected • by a 30' pathway easement to the easternmost cul-de-sac. This will provide an uninterrupted pedestrian connection, all the way to Patrick Eagan Park once the Mooney Lake elevation is lowered. A similar 30' trail easement from the western cul-de-sac to the undeveloped property to the north will allow pedestrian circulation as well as a potential emergency ingress/egress to the site. A road connection to the north appears unlikely due to the severity of the ,slopes. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This proposed development incorporates the majority of the low lying drainage ba -sins receiving surface water runoff from the property east of Pilot Knob Road between Deerwood Drive and Berry Ridge Road,. This proposed development incorporates several knolls and side slopes surrounding the three internal drainage basins with the maximum elevation differential of approximately 35' occurring in the extreme northeast corner. All drainage runoff generated from this proposed development will be directed to the internal drainage basins (JP -36 and JP -35) which will be interconnected through a combination of surface drainage swales and underground storm sewer pipe. The ultimate • discharge of these drainage basins is into Berry Patch Park and Mooney Lake (JP -7) to the east. With no positive outlet for Mooney Lake currently existing, it has exceeded its proposed future flood elevation and cannot accept anv additional runoff. X33 CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 • However, Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) is proposed to be upgraded during 1987. Part of this upgrading will require the development of these internal drainage basins and the permanent outlet for Mooney Lake towards Patrick Eagan Park to handle the runoff generated from this County road improvement. This storm sewer outlet to handle both Pilot Knob Road and this proposed development will be discussed under Project 473 which will have its public hearing held on July 15, 1986. If this project is approved, downstream storm sewer facilities will be adequate to handle this proposed development. This development will be responsible for all internal storm sewer laterals necessary to handle surface water runoff generated from this development and to intercept the surface water runoff from the Pines development located to the south. The final grading, drainage and utility plan shall show all storm sewer pipes constructed to the edge of existing or controlled water elevations, whichever is lower. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth is immediately available adjacent to the south property line near Pilot Knob Road. Internal extensions of a sanitary sewer lateral system will adequately service all proposed lots. However, staff does not concur with the proposed lateral extension along rear lot lines adjacent to the north edge of Pond JP -35 to service Lot 16, 17 and 18 due to limited accessibility for preventative and corrective maintenance, as may be necessary. Each parcel should have its individual sewer service constructed to public right-of-way. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is located along Pilot Knob Road to service this proposed development through an internal lateral extension. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing boundaries and severe topography of property adjacent to all three sides of this proposed development, and the location and configuration of the internal drainage basins, there is no other feasible alternative for development of this property without a variance to the City's maximum cul-de-sac length ordinance (500'). Development boundary and topographic cgnstraints result in the two cul-de- sacs and one bubble being necessary for reasonable development of this property. The staff has no objections to the proposed internal islands of each cul-de-sac subject to their development.. incorporating maintenance free landscaping. Final detailed design should be subject to staff's review and requirements. • Access to Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) will be subject to approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. Its optimal location in relationship to minimizing impact for the McCarthy parcel across the road would result in the entrance being located approximately 300' north of the south boundary line. This 30' shift of the proposed center line will also better comply with the County's intersection spacing gy,idelines. CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 The proposed center island at the entrance from Pilot Knob Road should be eliminated. Also, although the internal streets are proposed to be publicly dedicated, they do not meet current ordinance requirements for width (26-28 vs. 34). These streets should be brought up to City standards if they are to be publicly dedicated. EASEMENTS,/RIGHT-OF-WAY: Sufficient drainage and ponding easements should be dedicated for the internal drainage basins adequate to protect the necessary ponding storage volume requirements and interconnecting storm sewer systems. The configuration of these drainage easements will be determined upon submission of final detailed plans for review .by the Engi•neer.ing Division. If the standard street width requirements are maintained, staff is recommending that the public right-of-way dedication be 60' in lieu of the proposed 50' width. The staff concurs with the proposed 30' pathway easements from the terminal cul-de-sac to Mooney Lake with the.final alignment being approved by City staff. - Suf-ficient right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road shall be dedicated as required by Dakota County to facilitate the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road. Restricted access shall be dedicated on the final plat for all frontage along Pilot Knob Road on either side of the proposed street access point. All other internal drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by City ordinance and/or final detail plan submittal and reviewed by City staff. ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer and water have been previously assessed on all the land proposed to be developed under this subdivision. Trunk area storm sewer is proposed to be assessed under Project 473, which will have its public hearing on July 15. However, the proposed assessment under this project does not take into consideration the proposed development into single-family lots. Subsequently, significant credits have been calculated under the "large lot" policy which would be voided under this proposed development. Therefore, as a condition of final plat approval, this development shall agree to assume its trunk area storm sewer assessments based on a single family development. Appropriate credit- will be given for any related assessment that may be approved under Project 473. • /3� CHATTERTON PONDS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 5 This development has not paid its related lateral benefit assessments from the existing 27" trunk sanitary sewer along the south and west boundary of this plat or the 12" trunk water main along Pilot Knob Road when they were originally installed. Therefore, this development shall accept these postponed assessment obligations as a condition of final plat approval based on the rates in affect. These amounts are estimated as follows: Storm Sewer To be determined based on final plat area calcula-tions and ponding credits. Sanitary Sewer 5801+300'-150' (corner lot credit) = 730" @'$'14.35/FF = $10,475.50 (Proj. 88II) Water 1/2 (600') @ $11.,88/FF = $ 3,564.00 (Proj. 24A) ® With the restricted access being dedicated to Pilot Knob Road other than the public street access, there will be no assessment associated with the Pilot Knob Road upgrading. Representatives of the Rngineer.ing Division will be available to discuss these concerns infurtherdetail with the Planning Commission or City Council at the appropriate meetings for formal review and approval. TAC/ jj • 104 CHATTERTON PONDS PAGE 6 CONDITIONS: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac • street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 60' in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the. Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accomodate all public utilities,, ponds and tra-i'lways. 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single—family development. 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. 8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) be removed prior to building permit:.issuance. 11. Park dedication fees & trail issues be resolved prior, to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. C1 /37 0 • • /3e ` (L FiMe MBM pp pBPM q u MUMICMIL t CFMMR s WNDCWST PARK 2 4 BFMBP S� 22 MMR �S �'prV1 M1M/CR_ S .3 S i�Luso. P ` a C c4 4 q FO 3 A. I'l SII^�IIIB 3 ,y, /3e MIwqIIrI, 0 \\.. s )I ,N4 Chv - Y, 4119 q.h. 17. 34,3 k 29,946.2 7.5, h 16. A. 2 ft I IL - - -------- 9. GROSS �QLJARE F OTAGE Site: 830,362.5 sq.ft. = 19.06 Acres Total Lots: 724,410 Number of Low 28 Density 1.47 D.U. per Aae Lin 1. 01 V -23, I I DP 11i '52 829:6 860295 F C P - 12 C P I 826 5 0 9,,3 6 .7' -L-0 Dk-"20? l 871 0 89Z2 8800 J 3 I.JP-67 J�'-j j! , 1171.0 47. jP-2 8800 4763 1 CP- 11 8490 , 95 0 80,, 1 844 0 'j� w. l JP -47 30 JP -15 'I � 049.2. 8440 7T i -I '111 -Ls 11) 48 J -C 24 ut 6 84 P 13 79 t 8 I. Ali, Old ip .23. J 834.0 71.ACKH4.-,K 27' PIAL't- I PAHY P-2NN 1 7S923iJP-1 8 80/.0 0 P-29 t 7 820 6j '0 11 18.0 SKJ 10A t�c i l5 - 1097 8 9 BP -28 0 JP -49 862S Bp-�3 868 818,1 8860, 8300 R- ; k I city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME I) P- 4 N.- C',FIRIAGE LK, 686742: ADI n - r12 Ot F 893,0U BBB/ 895.5 JP 46 993512 3 YP 5 1 12' 63 'J699�7�P' JP 3(2 81JP- l 2 ip-11 900?!'j(ll"1 8�8 - .71 8157 JP 44 z 9& 6300 8907 - J h}- w 40. I 11 -Y J-1 /s-30 873D AD5 94 87 :r I �i 23 /19 6�09 JP -, 9450 8706 873jp-3'5 JP 7 ,? 6694 1,19 SP -3 .4 88724 85 BP - 35905,2 9760 9800 J -,e 908.0 6 j 9 3, N JF -q.- SP -5 BP -4 874,2 875 0 *1 9240%B 1 65 9272882 BP -2 3 B., 8 86.0 855.0 4 lij C2- BSB O L -d v : . 1 B-k- BP 24. 7 �1 —BP -5- -Y- 918 0 8745 8865 LP 44 846 B-4 k�;f 853 .20, o,��,:, :BP 5P- 17 867 1 ;..:t I L - '8920 'P "4 2 -23 .,931.3 1 - 1 5 830. �Jji 0 932. 8219 92 27' ay BitAO - I uL vu EGBP-16 .2' lI ,,00 -1z, ��Lsl 18/9 I. r BP -IS L L.S. 1 Lb 8 BP -111 9 899 L 54 -`..8910 city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME I) P- 4 N.- C',FIRIAGE LK, 686742: ADI n - r12 Ot F 893,0U BBB/ 895.5 JP 46 993512 3 YP 5 1 12' 63 'J699�7�P' JP 3(2 81JP- l 2 ip-11 900?!'j(ll"1 8�8 - .71 8157 JP 44 z 9& 6300 8907 - J h}- w 40. I 11 -Y J-1 /s-30 873D AD5 94 87 :r I �i 23 /19 6�09 JP -, 9450 I 99370 1 1 j .9080 l:!:; ................ ............... ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ ................ ............... STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ul— 9 ILP -401 .7, — 1 896.0 LNUT I [,,-. -- V9 6'0 ....... .�LP 37 1.9006 8783 FIG. -*1 approved- standard - plate #: I JP 51 9760 9800 J -,e '1.1 Jp-2a p85-43 53.8 ADD �1956 0 9694 L -d v T I 99370 1 1 j .9080 l:!:; ................ ............... ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL ................ ................ ................ ............... STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ul— 9 ILP -401 .7, — 1 896.0 LNUT I [,,-. -- V9 6'0 ....... .�LP 37 1.9006 8783 FIG. -*1 approved- standard - plate #: I APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® 13. A 10 foot utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the easterly lot line for sanitary sewer purposes. 14. This development shall be responsible for MPCA and MWCC permits if required. 15. This project shall be subject to approval and review by the Eagan Fire Department, in particular with regard to access to the northerly end of the building, and the location of the trash storage. All voted yea. CHATTERTON PONDS - ROBERT ENGSTROM - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the application of Robert Engstrom for preliminary plat consisting of 26 single family lots on 19.6 acres and a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 22, abutting Pilot Knob Road to the west, south of St. John Neumann Church. Dale Runkle introduced the project consisting of 28 single family lots with one substantial existing home. Mr..Bob Engstrom was present to describe the proposal and the need for stovepipe lots and requesting narrower streets with the preservation of trees and boulevards. Mr. Earl Kenealy, III, Kevin Johnson, Wilbur Winland and Ernest Kolstad of The Pines Addition appeared in 40 regard to the project, indicating their concern with the environmental impact and the location relative to the development where they lived. Discussion centered around the width of the street, the proposed split entry, the stovepipe lots, the need or lack of need for a path from the park into this particular development, and the possibility of future extension of streets within the development. Hall moved, Voracek seconded the motion to -recommend approval of the preliminary plat and rezoning. to R-1, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance shall be granted for the length of cul-de-sac street construction. 2. All internal right-of-way shall be a minimum of 50 feet in width. 3. All internal street construction shall meet City standards for width with final cul-de-sac design being approved by the Engineering Division. 4. All grading, street and utility construction shall be in conformance with current City engineering design standards. 5. All drainage, utility and ponding easements shall be dedicated with the final plat of sufficient size to accommodate all public utilities, ponds and trailways. ® 6. This development shall assume all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision. In addition, it shall be responsible for the additional trunk area storm sewer assessments associated with this single-family development. A(/ APC Minutes June 24, 1986 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. 8. The Pilot Knob Road access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. It was also recommended that the staff ® plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. All voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of McCoombs, Knutson. was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR i FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: JULY 11, 1986 RE: ADVISORY PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING CHATTERTON POND At the Commission meeting on July 10, 1986, the Commission reviewed the proposed preliminary plat for Chatterton Ponds. Commission members had made an on-site visit to the site to review and investigate the topography of the area, to determine if the trail connection between the proposed plat, and Berry Ridge Park to the east could be made. After their reviewal and discussion, the Commission made the following recommendations: 1. That a cash dedication requirement be required for all lots. 2. Trailway on Pilot Knob Road be the responsibility of this development. 3. That a five foot bituminous path be developed connecting the easterly ® most cul-de-sac to the east boundary of the plat, connectable to the trailway in Berry Ridge Park. 4. That the developer bench in a trail bed two feet above the normal pond elevation, and provide a trail easement through proposed lot 24 to that portion of Berry Patch Park now inaccessible. Should you have any questions regarding the Commission's recommendations, please feel free to contact me. KV/bls C1 J i y3 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 198,6, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One PRELIMINARY-PLAT/TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE I. Preliminary Plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake Consisting of 60 Townhouse, Units --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by New Horizon Homes for a 60 unit townhouse project located on approximately 14 acres and described as Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights. The APC is recommending. approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department reports, a copy is enclosed on pages Mo through. For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(s') rl . The original Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission requirements for this PUD still apply; therefore, there are no additional recommendations. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny preliminary plat for the Trails of Thomas Lake. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT, 'THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE' • APPLICANT: NEW HORIZON HOMES LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING OUTLOT C, THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS, NW.1/4,.SEC.,28 R-3 IN THE BLACKHAWK P.D. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 24, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 6, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPTS. ZONING AND LAND USE: Outlot C is surrounded by the recently approved Deerfield Apartments to the north, Thomas Lake Heights quads to the east, the Highline Trail to the south and an un- developed R-4 district to the west. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area as a mixture of Parks (P) and Mixed Residential (R-2) with a density of 3-6 units/acre. The site has steep slopes and drains primarily into a pond on the southern portion of the site and off-site to the east. SITE PLANNING: Clemson Drive will be continued west for approxi- mately 200 feet and then proceed north forming Beacon Hill Court. All of the quadraminium buildings exceed the 30 foot front yard • setback and have more than the 30 feet between buildings which was required in the Thomas Lake replat in 1983. Clemson Drive continues west to the property line where a temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed until development in the R-4 district occurs. The Williams Brothers Pipeline easement extends 40 feet into this plat along the eastern property line. There are no setback problems. Each quad unit will be served by two private entry drives most of which are 14' wide. Code requires 1 indoor parking space and one outdoor space for each unit. This is provided ,with the parking area in front of each garage. COMMENTS: This development will have an association to control trash pickup and maintain the common areas. The architectural styling/color of the buildings will be the same as that in the Thomas Lake Heights Addition. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted and should need little or no revisions. GRADING/DRAINAGE: This development incorporates a section of land with considerable variations in topography and elevation with the maximum differential of approximately 40' in the center of the plat. Approximately the northern two-thirds of this development will direct its surface drainage to the northeast . into the drainage basin within the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition which is ultimately connected through a series of storm sewers to the system within Thomas Lake Road. The lower third of this development will direct its surface water runoff to the /0!� THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE JUNE 24, 1986 PA'G'E 2 ` south into the Highline Trail drainage basin Pond BP -6. This southerly drainage basin currently receives runoff from the Mallard Park and Woodgate Additions and does not have an outlet presently available. A future outlet would be provided through the installation of a storm sewer lift' station and force main discharging into Thomas Lake Road. However, at the present time, this drainage basin is able to handle all current drainage and anticipated future runoff from this lower third portion of the proposed Trails of Thomas Lake Addition without requiring the installation of this outlet. STREETS/CIRCULATION: Due to the existing topography and property line constraints, it is not feasible to eliminate the proposed cul-de-sac to the north. This cul-de-sac will require a variance due to its length exceeding the maximum 500' allowed by City Code. Clemson Drive is proposed to be a continuation from the Thomas Lake Heights 2nd Addition eventually connecting to Johnny,. Cake Ridge Road through the future development of the Wi.lmus property to the west. The center line of Clemson Drive is shown approximately 625' north of the south line to allow its extension to Johnny Cake Ridge Road to conform to the proposed future parkland dedication associated with the development of the Wilmus property. This stub street portion of Clemson Drive will have to have a full right-of-way and cul-de-sac constructed until such time that the adjacent properties develop to allow its continuation. The staff supports.the proposed configuration of the cul-de-sac street and Clemson Drive intersection which will help to provide continuity but yet discourage through -traffic due to the turning movement required. Staff recommends that the name "Beacon Hill Court" be changed to avoid confusion with the Beacon Hill Subdivision located south of Cliff Road. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, capacity and depth has been stubbed to the east property line of this proposed subdivision to be extended upon a future development such as this. Althought the western boundary represents the major drainage district divide for sanitary sewer, it is recommended that the sanitary sewer lateral be extended to the west property line to provide maximum flexibility for future development of the unplatted property and park land to the west. Water main of sufficient size and capacity is availabe to handle this proposed development with the lateral extension through this property. With the development of the Thomas Lake Heights Addition, a water main stub has been provided in the northeast corner to be picked up by this proposed development through the cul-de-sac for proper looping and fire protection which is not shown on the preliminary utility plans submitted. The water lateral should be stubbed to the west property line to provide for future extension and continuity of the water system. • Other details associated with the installation of sanitary, storm sewer and water main must meet the current City engineering standards at the time of final plan review and .approval as a part of the final plat process. 1�4 THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY: The drainage and ponding easement of sufficient size and storage volume shall be dedicated over the southern portion of this plat necessary to meet the requirements of the Master Storm Sewer Plan for drainage basin SP -6. The final alignment and configuration of this easement will be defined at the time of final plat approval. All other internal utility line easements will be defined after final engineering review of utility plans and shall be dedicated as a part of the final plat. All other public right-of-way dedication meets the City Ordinance and engineering requirements for this type of subdivision. However, additional right-of-way or roadway easement will have to be conveyed to the City to accomodate the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac,at the western end of Clemson Drive. ASSESSMENTS: All trunk area assessments for sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer have been previously assessed under Projects #88, 237 and 256, respectively. No new additional assessments are required as a condition of final plat approval. However, all costs associated with the installation of streets and utilities to service this subdivision and its future extension to the west boundary line will be the entire responsibility of this subdivision. 40 Representatives of the Engineering Division will be available to discuss any aspect of this report during the review process before the Planning Commission and/or City Council. 0 THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE PAGE 4 CONDITIONS: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be desig,ned in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadwayeasements• shall be conveyed to allow the construction of the temporary cul-de- sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A yard ance must be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul -de -sac - 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul -de -sac -to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated' on the final plat as required by City staff subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. a. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. • 0 • F -IL /q (V f � 'eO HT- 'I e.a1 � wee • Ya j�`'�• © n�iire � �-/ q� vIPA LT ..Ib e.r.a •�p 'qR L y. vena I,�Y4 .r 'F i1v a Cef /q RANT S[.NEDULE 14 DEVELOPMENT SUI.IPV�RV nvur•4T M1�n�u if.. � u.nR Ac rws ee•+-b+rf..-r 1.1 u/n o r w w ._ _.. ...... . _ - iZ�PRElIMINNC! IANDSCAPE/(tNERFL LEVFI'ENT 55OCIWE5. INCOMme 11imM nTHE TRAILS OF TI-=, LAKE _ HORIZON ��- �"'• MCCOMBSKH NOMEJ. ING. tit z pmv , "�'8076 HJ. : 27 r I I L rv•BP- A 4 ' I -7 '. JN 7923 .9006 e�-' 80 BP -2 t 8091 099.7 A -CCC 818.0 tP_ g� AP - 8566., BP -28 8189 i. lntc'� 8300 -33 8 A-� - 61 f I 488668 -b 8663 k B.P. 72 36' A�d - [A - 5.? JP -36 .1 tl � : 26 77, J419N5� 18P59 i 68 A0 jj -,'LI�F�� I Q1. i BP_3 8724 1 965. l-1-11 98 809529 PM ii L: T.'. 13 P - 35 ec 9080 JP -4V ',-7; -0' 8745 74 0 1 AP_ I'Ll 68Z 3 1 j' -4 875 B P BP 25 J 8742 -.8.?06 71 R T - 9240 8,96 5 927. P LP; 6 3 AP 886.01 nB 6 :6 . L. I a I 'ZA 85816 A 8860 A 11 (:2'- L 12 -7 8-k -SP-24 BP_5 AP 5 9 18 0 8145 1 L P /AP 8899043 1 '903 2' 1 886 �5 4 889.2AP-28 9100 ��6p-iti IF 1 9181 892o 11-:- LP -42 8871 AjIr BP -23 Is J1 840.5 BP -16 850.0 ,11 9323 93L3 [- / ";� B -9 AP 12 /Y.b I P -91123 Z' 893.3 BP- 2,7 P P_ '898P A' - P-22' ir"A 43 9040 1 ! _� 8736 9 r-1) k L J 8 6 0 'C"o 9 9 9098 3-9 8 L -, .1 - ". A 9.160 12' 27 -e AP -26 C'6 .I _6� B P - 15 L 0835, S. -3i -- 19K) BF -14 71 LP15 BP 2.6 904 8990 A -CC fit, 9160 904 686L_j I AP -23 , lil, '. , . 1110 : 900.� IS 8893 K BP 13 roll 9050. .921.4 81.7 P-19 92-7.0 Z4 27'BP-B BP_1 ID' - - .9150 8- h. 912 1 AP- II/ 159200 -.90o'53 ;69,6'\ 12 Y182 A., BP -21 Wdklf :L 894 1 � " P-25 9160 AT Fev 6805 BP 7 AP -50 886:5 sj 8860BP 22 13�0 11.4 51 ) I I - - �AP-4� Ct, 894.0 0 - . �r! , � . 9 276.40 ..904 _ 1. -.-- __ I . 8P_12 G. BP -31 9080 A.dd/ r B-. 11 9140 AP -13 . -T� -� , . I IT.� B P I 0( 935 BP -34 08. /V Al 14 1 97' 988,0 912. 1 -1-9. R IGO6. 0 _9'3 2 R:i,r AP -44 YJ f. jo'i[K6 L41 57 g �'z 911.0 r 915.9 L,S.-21 7% , LT 9180 o AP -29 121 GOI. tHa916 0 COUN 92a AP 16 ��,DcAP­48 S -21A LP _,260 "0" f _io- -58 892,0 4 -4 '9051 ��'-AP S� LP AP -15 9 3 4 C,)�00� LP 41'. 907.1 9088 9383 9130' :i K863 1 148 J 30 915.0 9 A 9P 9 22 9 9 , '2 2 26. LP_ 9A3 9255 0-0* P-18 ' T grit',7.LP-96 AD- BJECT PARCEL ou ................ ................ ................ ............... 'op FIG. +1 City of eagan approved: standard - PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate #: WORKS DEPARTMEN7 MASTER PLAN APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® j! 7. The final plat shall not be approved until the outlet for Mooney Lake (JP -7) has been ordered by Council action. B. The Pilot Knob Road -access center island shall be eliminated. 9. The association shall be responsible for the maintenance and planting of the cul-de-sac islands. 10. The existing farm animals (cows) shall be removed prior to building - permit issuance. _ 11. Park dedication fees 'and trail issues shall be resolved prior to final .plat. 12. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 13. All lots shall have at least 50 feet of frontage in compliance with ordinances. 14. That this development shall be responsible for lateral benefit assessments for water and sanitary sewer. 15. That the split entry shall not be allowed but that center islands in • the cul-de-sacs shall be approved. 'I[ was also recommended that the staff plan to save as many trees as possible in the boulevard areas. All voted yea, except Wilkins who voted nay. THE TRAILS OF THOMAS LAKE - NEW HORIZON HOMES - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairman Harrison then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of New Horizon Homes for a preliminary plat consisting of 60 townhome units on approximately 14 acres, located on Outlot C, Thomas Lake Heights, in part of the northwest quarter of Section 28, north of Clemson Drive.and west of Thomas Lake Road. Dale Runkle introduced the project indicating that it was staff's opinion that this was the only feasible way of developing the property. Mr. Doug Frank of Mc Coombs, Knutson was present on behalf of the developer. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat in addition to a variance of 30 feet for the 530 foot cul-de- sac, subject to the following conditions: 1. All detailed utility and street improvement plans shall be designed in accordance with current City engineering standards and requirements. 2. Additional right-of-way and/or roadway easements shall be conveyed to ® allow the construction of the temporary cul-de-sac for Clemson Drive on the west boundary. 3. A variance shall be granted prior to final plat approval for the excessive length of the cul-de-sac. 8 APC Minutes June 24, 1986 ® 4. Street name for the cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all Qf the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. B. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary, plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A ® (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at • 11:50 p.m. All voted yea. DGK 9 Secretary - APC E Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/PARK FOREST APARTMENTS J. Preliminary Plat for Park Forest Apartments Consisting of 420 Apartment Units on Approximately 32 Acres and Rezoning from A (Agricultural to R-4 (Multiple) --A public hearing was held at the June 24, 1986 APC meeting, to consider a rezoning application from A to R-4 and a preliminary plat for a 420 unit apartment complex as submitted by Earl Jespersen. The APC is recommending denial of both the rezoning and preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering reports found on pages zf through "On/ . For a copy of the APC action, refer to page(/A 165 .. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a cash dedication and trailway on Federal Drive. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning from A to R-4 and the preliminary plat for Park Forest Apartments as presented. /5(/ L CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICANT: DESIGN COLLECTIVE (EARL JESPERSEN) PARK FOREST APARTMENTS LOCATION: S.E. 1/4, SECTION 16 EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: A (AGRICULTURAL) JUNE 24, 1986 JUNE 11, 1986 PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by The Design Collective requesting a rezoning of a 32 acre A (Agricultural) parcel to R-4 (Multiple) and a preliminary plat for 420 Apartment units. This site is located west of Federal Drive and 35E in the SE 1/4 of Section 16. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this site as R-1 (Single Family) and R-2 (.Mixed Residential). Therefore, an amendment • to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will be required. ZONING AND LAND USE: This development is surrounded by agri- cultural (A) land to the north„ 35E to the east, Blackhawk Glen (R-1) to the west and the northernmost portion of the Blackhawk Planned Development. This P.D. has both R-3 and R-4 districts bordering the .proposed apartment project. An undeveloped portion of the Blackhawk Hills single family development is to the immediate southwest of the site - The topography is rolling with knolls and depressions. Existing vegetation consisting primarily of elm, cottonwood and popper is scattered, often found in the depressed areas. CODE COMPLIANCE: The 420 units give the project an overall density of 13.13 units/acre. Code requires that the minimum setback shall be increased by 1 foot for each foot of height over 35 feet. The building on the NW is shown approximately 30 feet from the Pacific Avenue R.O.W. where a 50 foot setback along a public street i•s required. Building sections and elevations have not been submitted but staff was told that these buildings would be similar in scale to the Lemay Lake Apartments. Therefore,, this building would need to be moved to the south to meet code compliance. This may also be the case on the northeastern most building, that is 50 feet from the property line. All other setbacks • meet code requirements. The 420 un -its will require 420 indoor parking stalls included with the rent in order to provide the 420 10' x 20' outdoor spaces being proposed. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 2 SITE PLANNING/LANDSCAPING: The six dwelling buildings are serviced • by two main divided entries from Federal Drive on the east and south and by a single access from Pacific Avenue on the north. The drives converge to the center of the site (south of the pond) where the 3,00'0 S.F. clubhouse is situated. Amenities located in this area include a spa for '10 people, 2 outdoor raquetball courts and 2 tennis courts. The Parks and Recreation Department will require a trailway along Federal Drive for the entire length of the project along with a cash dedication fee. A preliminary landscape plan has been submitted by an out of state architect that will need to be strongly upgraded to meet City standards. On multifamily projects, one tree per unit is the minimum standard. This would allow for performance standards enabling the City to require a more dense screening from roads, parking areas, trash enclosures and especially different adjacent land uses. Building heights and landscape plans submitted on proposed grading plans are necessary to provide adequate buffering. Existing trees should be carefully located in an effort to save as many as possible. The detailed plan required for final plat approval should be done by a landscape architect familiar' with native species.. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the developer • submitted for this development is feasible. The applicant does, however, propose on filling some of Pond JP -2 which is located at the north end of this proposed project as shown on Figure 1. This pond is designated as a future City detention pond in the Storm Sewer Comprehensive Plan. The developer has shown on the preliminary grading plan that he can provide the necessary ponding area by reshaping the pond somewhat. Before the City can approve the final plat for this development, the City must authorize the project to construct the outflow pipe from Pond JP -2. The City installed a portion of this pipe under 35-E during its construction. The portion west of Federal Drive to Pond JP -2 and the portion east of 35-E to Pond JP -3 remain to be constructed. UTILITIES: City Project 432 provided for the installation of sanitary sewer through the middle of this development to provide service to the Royal Oaks Addition immediately north of this proposed development. The sewer is deep enough and of adequate size and capacity to provide service to this development. A 30" trunk water main will be brought to the northwest corner of this proposed development. This water main is being constructed under City Project 451. The contractor will complete this work this summer. 16� PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 3 • With this development, staff recommends extending this 30" trunk water main to Federal Drive. From there it can easily be put across the freeway because the City had the casing pipe installed with the Interstate construction. This line can then tie into an existing 30" line within Duckwood Drive, west of Pilot Knob Road. Figure 2 shows how the completion of this water main fits with the City's Comprehensive Trunk Water Main Plan. Staff recommends the Council not approve the final plat for this development until the Council authorizes the installation of the 30" trunk water main. Also according to the City's Master Plan, the 8" water line proposed within this development should be brought to the southwest corner of this development to connect to an existing 8" line servicing the Blackhawk Hills Additions. This, along with a 30" line, will complete the City's trunk water system west of 35- E in this area. STREETS: Federal Drive borders this proposed development along the east with Blackhawk Road bordering this development along the south. Pacific Avenue will be brought to the northwest corner of this development with the platting of the Hampton Heights Addition. Both Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road are built to their ultimate design sections. • Staff has no problems with the two access points proposed. Both appear to have adequate sight distance. The developer proposes on extending Pacific Avenue about 500' east. The extension of Pacific Avenue will require a 30' easement from the property to the north. Because this street is proposed to temporarily deadend, the City will require the construction of a temporary turn -around. In the future, this street could connect to Violet Lane. This development is responsible for a 5' concrete sidewalk along Federal Drive, its west property line. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The only right-of-way necessary for this development to dedicate is a 30' half right-of-way for Pacific Avenue. MnDOT acquired the right-of-way for Federal Drive and Blackhawk Hills Road with its I -35E right-of-way acquisition. It may be necessary for this development to dedicate an additional 5' of right-of-way for the sidewalk along Federal Drive. At this writing, staff has not been able to determine the right-of-way for Federal Drive becuase it was included with the I -35E right-of-way acquisition. The City will require the dedication of a ponding easement over Pond JP -2 encompassing the 852 high water elevation. The City • will also require a 20' utility easement over the storm sewer outflow line from Pond JP -2 and a 20' utility easement over the 8" and 30" water main. PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS JUNE 24, 1986 PAGE 4 Also, a -s a condition of final plat approval, this development will be required to obtain the necessary street easements for Pacific Avenue and its turn -around from the property to the north. PERMITS: This development will require permits from the Minnesota Department of Health for water main extension. Also, a sanitary sewer extension permit from MPCA will be required. In resea-aching the City's assessment records, staff found that this development is responsible for trunk water area. assessment and upgrading the trunk area storm sewer assessment from single family to multifamily because of the proposed R-4 use. This development will also be responsible for the lateral benefit from trunk Water main assessment resulting from the 3'0" trunk water main construction as shown on Figure 3. The following table. summarizes these assessment obligations of this development. Description Trunk Area Water Trunk Storm Sewer Upgrade Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water (1) Net area total. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Est'd Quantity 27.2 (1) 1,186,140 (1) 618 (2') Multi -family - single family rate. 1986 Rate $1,190/Ac. Amount 0.014/sq.ft. (2) 11.88/f.f. $32,370 All costs for the installation of all internal utilities, except possibly for trunk storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility of this development. 16,600 7,340 PARK RIDGE APARTMENTS PAGE 5 CONDITIONS: • 1.. This development shall provide the amount of storage volume for Pond JP -2 as required by the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. 2. Final plat approval cannot occur until Council authorizes the installation of the trunk storm sewer line outlet, the 30" trunk water main, and the 8" trunk water main loop to .Federal Drive, unless the applicant wishes to install any portion of these utilities under private contract. 3. The development shall dedicate a 30" right-of-way for Pacific Avenue and be responsible for obtaining the northerly 30' and turn -around easement for Pacific Avenue. 4. This development shall be responsible for obtaining Minnesota Department of Health, MnDOT and MPCA permits. 5. Staff shall approve any phasing plans. 6. This development shall be responsible for a 5'concrete sidewalk, and a 5' right-of-way if necessary, along Federal Drive to the west edge of this plat. 7. A detailed landscape plan submitted on a grading plan with the final plat submission. A bond shall be submitted and ® not released until one year after the installation. 8. All standard plat conditions be adhered to. C� 1sf • • 11 n.[ oaooiE jj If I11 E !IC/LIIIM Y� _� :f ,P ® CEMR OILPRI PYIP LL�L9 sPRPCE bi iaT_ we og71—r o. I TOY Iddr � f O L u M1 v aRE U<l LIPP�I� 7 L EEORR r �If1[PGIr YUMI[lNL .� ® CENTER n L al/A 3/11731107 -' �1N3W121VdV.•v1 - full .......... M,zo, i-7 r a "I . . . . ............. Zia s P-37. 03.6 o7 6 AP -35 660.6 9660 city of eagan PUBLIC r _ WORKS ................ ............... ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL STORM SEWER MASTER PLAN ( ) DP-: 90U 904.1 FIG. +1 approved: standard - plate #: city of eagan PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN • I 1810 FIG. #3 approved:"a""a1O plate #: ® �p�LIMIIJPRV FLAT - .._ _.. '. Y;u;,,i tr�:�:- h �...o�os .��nva+•ssnn..=s �.c BLACKIJ.AWK APARTMENTS ,_) COOL EG -c .Tu APC Minutes June 24, 1986 • 4. Street name for the ~cul-de-sac shall be changed to Clemson Court or Circle. 5. The water main shall be looped from the cul-de-sac to the existing stub in the northeast corner. 6. All drainage, ponding and utility easements shall be dedicated on the final plat as required by City staff, subject to final detail plan review and approval. 7. This plat shall be subject to all of the applicable conditions in the Blackhawk Park PD Agreement. 8. One Homeowners Association shall control "The Trails of Thomas Lake". 9. This plat shall be subject to all standard plat conditions. All voted yes. PARK FOREST APARTMENTS - DESIGN COLLECTIVE - PRELIMINARY PLAT S REZONING The public hearing in regard to the application for preliminary plat for 420 apartment units on approximately 32 acres, and rezoning from A ® (Agricultural) to R-4 (Multiple) located in part of the southeast quarter of Section 16, south of Violet Lane, abutting Federal Drive, was then convened by Chairman Harrison. Earl Jasperson described the proposal for the apartment units within the area designated by the Comp Guide as R -I and R -II. Several members of the public were present to object, including George and Joan Bohlig of 1680 Blackhawk Cove, and Harry Lemieux owning single family homes adjacent to the proposed project. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation and Peter Phlaum of Lundgren Builders were also present to object, based on their development west of the project of single family homes. Discussion centered around the need or lack of need for apartments within the City of Eagan, in addition to the over-all City plan. Mulrooney moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat and rezoning. All voted in favor. Harrison then moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend that staff provide more legible layouts of developments, including providing larger than 8 1/2 by 11 sheets, if necessary, so that dimensions are legible to Commission members. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT Mulrooney moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend adjournment at 11:50 p.m. All voted yea: ® DGK Secretary - APC 9 • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three ADDITIONAL ITEMS SOUND LEVEL METER PROGRAM A. League of Minnesota Sound Level Meter Program --On at least two (2) occasions, the City Council has given consideration to the purchase of a noise sound meter. On one occasion there was interest expressed in purchasing a noise meter for the purpose of monitoring airport noise and more recently, there is discussion regarding acquisition of a noise meter for monitoring the Sperry semiconductor facility. The high cost for a noise meter was a reason in both cases as to why a sound meter program was not established. A second reason related to potential liability if the noise meter is used as an en-forcement device. It would be necessary to have an employee properly trained if the results of the noise meter are to be used as reason for enforcing our noise ordinance. The City has an environmental noise ordinance and with the growing number of complaints related to noise compatibility, Administrative Assistant Hohenstein was asked to research available sound meter • programs and also address the liability factor if the noise meter were to be used by City staff in an effort to enforce the noise ordinance. The League of Minnesota Cities has a sound meter program which is available to the City and is explained in the attached memo prepared by Admi istrative Assistant Hohenstein, found on pages A67 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny implemen- tation of the sound meter program through the League of Minnesota Cities. 144 • MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT HOHENSTEIN DATE: JULY 8, 1986 SUBJECT: LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES SOUND METER PROGRAM Pursuant to our conversations, I have investigated the availability of sound level analyzing equipment. The purpose of this memo is to outline briefly the information that was gathered and possible alternatives for City action. The incidence of circumstances under which a sound level meter might be used in the City of Eagan are apparently increasing. These circumstances include a number of citizen complaints regarding the enforcement of the City's Environmental Noise Ordinance, complaints about traffic noise, requests for studies of noise compatibility for developments, and the increasing level of aircraft noise. Currently, it is neccesary to request special studies of the. MPCA to enforce or study any of these items. In the past, the City Council has expressed concern that the conduct of noise studies might tend to increase the City's liability to law suit. I have contacted a number of noise • experts including Dave Kelso of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Tom Duffy of the National Organization to Insure Sound Controlled Environment, John Nelson of the City of Bloomington and the Metrosonics Corporation. None are aware of precedent cases which hold a city liable for noise simply because it has conducted studies about its presence or level. In fact, there is a possibility that the new state noise standards may place a liability on cities for allowing land uses which are noise incompatible with those already in place. While the League of Minnesota Cities continues to oppose this rule and lobbying efforts may result in its amendment, the City may be best served if it is able to anticipate noise levels through the use of a meter before approving certain uses. Purchase prices and capacities for such equipment vary widely. A hand held unit from Larson -Davis Laboratories costs roughly $1,300. The Metrosonics sound level analyzer lists for $10,000. Electronic Design Company, Bruel and Kjaer and Quest Electronics all have equipment priced somewhere between. Obviously so great a diversity in equipment and cost implies a need for an expanded level of expertise in the sound analysis business before good decisions can be made on capital expenditures. For this reason, it may be advisable for the City to take part in the Leagueof Minnesota's Sound Meter Program. The League • purchased a number of 3M Model 3220 sound level meters with the intention of making them available to member cities at a nominal fee to conduct sound analysis. To date, response has been low and the League is willing to distribute them to cities on a loan basis without financial obligation except for unnecessary wear and tear. A copy of the custody agreement for such equipment is attached for your review._ The City may have the equipment for up 147 Sound Meter Program ® July 8, 1986 Page 2 to 18 months without charge and may renew the loan agreement at .that time. The PCA also makes available training for City staff who may be assigned to conduct measurements with the equipment. The training is conducted by MPCA staff member Dave Kelso and City of Bloomington staff member John Nelson. It is conducted as a portion of the Minnesota Police Officers Skills 'Training program. Initial training time commitments require only a couple of hours and subsequent training can be modified to fit specific interests. Because the nature of the complaints described above varies widely, it may advisable for representatives of several City Departments including Inspections, Planning, Police and Engineering to undertake the training. The availability of a sound level analyzer and the training in its use will allow the City staff to become familiar with the operation of such equipment and allow for more informed decisions if we were to consider purchase of such equipment in the future. Please inform me if you have any questions concerning this matter. Ad nistrative Assistant Enclosure JDH/jeh • On • Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Four OtemPUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1. Contract 86-2, Approve Plans/Order Advertisement for Bids (Nicols Road) --On February 18, 1986, the public hearing was closed and the project approved for the upgrading of Nicols Road from Kings Road to Beau D Rue Drive under the above referenced contract. Also, the preparation of the detailed plans and specifi- cations were also ordered. These plans have now been completed and are being presented to, the Council for their information, review, approval and authorization to advertise for competitive bid solicitation. The major concern regarding the upgrading of this road, besides the proposed assessments, dealt with the width and location of the trailway. The Council had directed Staff to meet with the property owners once final plans had been prepared and the proposed location of the trailway could be accurately located in the field. Enclosed on page , %Z is a memo regarding the results of that meeting. Also,, it should be noted that Staff designed the road improvement on Nicols Road north of Diffley Road to offset the proposed road improvement as far to the west as possible to minimize the impact of the trailway construction "-- --and to maintain as much boulevard green space as possible.- Also, ossible. Also, because ,of the changeover in :engineering personnel, these plans were not able to be completed until recently. Subsequently, the estimated construction timetable requires that only the southerly half (Kings Road to Cedar Ridge Circle) be initiated this year with the north half (Cedar Ridge Circle to Beau D Rue Drive.) beginning during the spring of 1987. The Public Works Director will be available to discuss in further detail these plans at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE 'CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the plans for Contract 86-2 (Nicols Road) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m., Thursday, August 14, 1986. ® MEMO TO: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR COLBERT FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER HEFTI DATE: JULY 9, 1986 SUBJECT: TRAILWAY NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING FOR HICOLS ROAD CITY PROJECT 460, CITY CONTRACT 86-2 On Tuesday afternoon, July 8, 1986, I met with seven out of fourteen of the property owners noticed who are impacted by the proposed trailway along Nicols Road being placed in front of their property. Prior to meeting with them, Bruce staked the east edge of the trailway on each person's property. The general consensus of the meeting was that most property owners were pleased with the trailway location because we were able to keep it away from front yard trees. Therefore, the location of the trailway does not appear to be a problem. As per the trailway width issue, the majority of the residents in attendance requested a five foot sidewalk instead of the eight foot trailway. I would divide the feeling of the residents into three areas regarding the trailway. There were some people who ® were vehemently against an eight foot trail, some people who had no problem with the eight foot trail until the five foot sidewalk substitution was brought up and one person who supported the eight foot trailway. I cited that the eight foot trailway is a standard in the City for two-way bicycle and pedestrian traffic and that staff would still be recommending the eight foot trailway but that I would forward their comments to the City Council through you. I don't know how many people will attend the meeting Tuesday 'night. I imagine the ones who most vehemently oppose the eight foot trailway will be in attendance. I told them it would probably be after 10:00 before the Council could get to th.e issue of approving plans for Nicols Road upgrading. I also told them we didn't anticipate beginning construction on their end until next spring. In an unrelated item, the residents were very concerned about the speeds on Nicols Road. I suggested that they write a letter to you requesting that Nicols Road be added to the City's list for further speed study by Mn Dot. I don't know how far the residents will push this issue. I would be happy to discuss this matter in further detail with you if you so desire. Assistant City Engineer 176 RMH/jeh Agenda Information Memo July 15„ 1986, City Council Meeting • Page Thirty -Five PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 2. Contract 86-18, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Daniel Drive) --On June 17, the Council approved the final plans for the installation of streets and utilities to Daniel Drive adjacent to the Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and authorized the advertise- ment for the bid opening that was held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, July 11. Enclosed on page I_ is a tabulation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the engi- neer's estimate contained in the feasibility report discussed at the public hearing held on June 17, 1986. All bids will be checked for accuracy on additions and extensions and a final recommendation will be provided by the Director of Public Works at the July I'S meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-18 (Daniel Drive) and award the contract to the. lowest responsible bidder. Our File No. 49395 CONTRACTORS 1. Nodland Associates 2. Burschville Construction 3. C.L. Contracting 4. Northdale Construction 5. J.P. Norex 6. Crossings Inc. BID AMOUNT ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE------------ FEAS. REPT EST — % UNDER ENG. EST — — % UNDER FEAS. REPT EST. ----- 6335d BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday,'July 11, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID $268,527.50 294,183.95 PROJECT 475 $240,277.50 270,000 283,870 —15.4% 302,959.27 306,402.85 328,807.20 331.847.05 PROJECT 468 $28,250 37,000 42,270 -23.6% —33.2% Agenda Information Memo July 15, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Six PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONT'D Item 3. Contract 86-11, Award Contract .(,Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) --At the July 1 meeting, the Council received the bids for the installation of sanitary sewer facilities to service the above referenced subdivisions. However, the bids received for the Williams & LaRue sanitary sewer exceeded the estimate contained in the feasibility report by approximately 19%. Subsequently, the Council directed Staff to review these increased cost estimates based on competitive bids with the property owners to see if they still wish to proceed with the project. If the project is reaf-firmed as discussed under the public hearing section of this agenda earlier in the meeting, it would be appropriate for the Council to award the contract to allow construction to begin. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award Contract 86-11 (Williams & LaRue, Wyndham Corporate Center) to J. P. Norex, Inc. in the amount of $172,387.20, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all, related contract documents and, if appropriate, ® . authorize the preparation of appropriate change orders to modify /73 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS ® FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: JULY 11, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE PROPOSED CHARITABLE GAMBLING POLICY City Councilmember Ellison prepared some information regarding a proposed Charitable Gambling Policy for review and discussion by the City Council. A copy of the policy and an Ordinance from the City of Janesville as presented_ by Councilmember Ellison is attached on pages ��`i`— through —. City Councilmember Ellison is planning to address this item immediately following the regular Council agenda as a part of City Council round table. BLUE BELL ICE CREAM Attached for City Council reference is a letter that was sent by the City Administrator to Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. stat}'ng at the specific conditions of operation. The letter is on page � / . BUILDING PERMITS • Attached ona es through is P g 9 Year -To -Date building p rmit informatio . AIRPORT NOISE a copy of the June Attached on pages through _ZBZ is a copy of a letter that was submitted to the City by a resident frustrated with the airport noise. -35E.ACCESS FROM YANKEE DOODLE ROAD City Councilmember Wachter has asked for information regarding an additional access to I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road. Enclosed is a copy of correspondence from the City of Eagan and a response from the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the I -35E access. This information is enclosed on pages /95 through I -E6 . SANITARY SEWER BACKUP/ASPEN DRIVE At the last City Council meeting both Mayor Blomquist and City Councilmember Egan received a letter from Mr. Steven Kaplan,repre- senting Peggy House, for damages she sustained relating to a sanitary sewer backup.. Since the item was addressed at the City Council meeting, a cop -y of our Public works Director's response is enclosed on pages If 7 through AV i7� FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORTS Enclosed on pages �/� through 9LI are copies of the March and April Fire Departmdnt Reports. - 7— MN DEPT OF HUMAN RIGHTS/TERESA A PIVAC VS CITY OF EAGAN Attached on pages /9/ through �W Ji is a copy of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights response stating that charges brought before the City of Eagan on hiring practices by Teresa Pivac have been dismissed. The Department of, Human Rights has determined that the complaint of illegal discrimination is without merit. POLICE INFORMATION Enclosed is a copy of various police instances that have occurred from mid-June until early July. Also enclosed is a response regarding the amount of training our child protection officer has received. This information is enclosed without page number. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 175 • • ORDINANCE NO. 206 An Ordinance to Provide for and Regulate The Conduct of Gambling and Related Activities within the City of Janesville, Minnesota • City Council of the City of Janesville, Minnesota, does hereby ordain: Subd. 1. Purpose and Intent. This ordinance is enacted for the following purposes: to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Janesville by closely regulat- ing the conduct of gambling. Subd. 2. The City Council finds that gambling is a nuisance prone activity and as such, is subject to restrictive regula- tion. The Council further finds and declares that the ability to conduct gambling and participate in gambling, is a privilege rather than a right. Subd. 3. Provisions of State Law Adopted. The provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 349, relating to the definition of terms, licensing and restric- tions of gambling are adopted and made a part of this Section as if set out in full. Amendments made pursuant to legisla- tion to said Chapter shall also be incorporated and adopted herein without further action. - Subd. 4. Local Approval of State Licensed Organizations. Pursuant to M.S. 349.213, the Charitable Gambling Control Board for the State of Minnesota must notify the City Council before ssuing or renewing an organization icense at the State level for those organizations whose premises are located within the City. if the City Council adopts a resolution disapproving the State license and so informs the Board within 30 days of such notice, the license may not be issued or renewed. Subd. 5. Obligations of State Licensed Organizations. State licensed organiza- tions within the City shall provide to the City Clerk copies of all information which such organization provides to the Charit- able Gambling Control Board. Such copies shall be provided to the City Clerk within seven days after the State licensed organization sends such information to ' the State. Failure of a State Licensed organization to provide such copies shall constitute a basis for disapproval of the license or renewal by the City Council. Subd. 6. Eligibility for License. Eligi- bility for a charitable gambling license within the City of Janesville, shall be restricted to local fraternal, religious, veterans and educational and other non-profit organizations. A local organiz- ation shall be defined as an organization having at least 40 percent of its members who list a Janesville City or Rural Route . `mailing address which would include the existing Janesville zip code, 56048, or its successor as determined by the U.S. Postal Service. __ _ ,/77 Subd. 7. Use of Proceeds of Charitable Gambling. All applications for licenses shall state the proposed use of funds received from the gambling activity. No license will be approved unless verifica- tion on the applicatiomis stated that at least 80 percent of the net proceeds collected from lawful charitable gambling shall be used to support recreational, cultural, and civic programs benefiting the citizens of Janesville. For purposes of this subsection, net proceeds shall be computed as follows: gross receipts from lawful gambling less reasonable sums necessarily and actually expended for the following items: (a) prizes; (b) gambling supplies and equipment which shall be defined as those expenses authorized by the Charitable Gambling Control Board in their adopted rules, specifically Subpart 2 (B) of Adopted Rule 7860.0160; (c) rent; (d) utilities used during gambling occa- sions (e) compensation paid to members for conducting gambling; (f) taxes impos- ed by Minnesota Statute Section 349.212 and; (g) maintenance of devices used in lawful gambling. Subd. 8. Premises. The use of or sale of gambling supplies and equipment de- scribed as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on the premises owned by eligible organizations as defined in Subdivision 6 of this Ordinance. Except for the preceding, the use of the gambling supplies and equipment described in this Subdivision shall be allowed only on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Janesville for the sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor. Subd. 8A. In leased locations authoriz- ed by this subdivision, the sale of pull -tabs, tip boards and the operation of paddle wheels shall take place in a designated area of the leased premises which area shall be separate from the counter, bar or service area. No sale of on or off sale liquor shall be allowed within the leased area. Locations authorized by this subdivision which are owned by the charitable organization need not desig- nate such a location within the premises. Subd. 9. Only those persons who have reached the age at which they are allowed to consume intoxicating liquor by Min- nesota Statutes, shall be allowed to participate in the charitable gambling use of pull labs, paddle wheels and tip boards or shall be employed by the organization. requesting the charitable gambling li- cense for the purpose of accomplishing the sale of the gambling devices describ- ed in this subdivision. Subd. 10. Hours of Operation. The use or sale of gambling supplies and equip- ment described as pull -tabs, paddle wheels and tip boards, shall be allowed on premises owned or leased by those organizations eligible for a charitable gambling license pursuant to Subdivision 6 only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 1 a.m. Subd. 11. The above notwithstanding, the conduct of bingo and sale of raffle tickets shall be allowed on Sundays and legal holidays when not prohibited by, Minnesota Statute 349 and any,amend- ments thereto. Subd. 12. Employees. Compensation to persons who participate in the conduct of lawful gambling, may be paid only to active members of the conducting organ- ization or its auxiliary, or to the spouse or the surviving spouse of an active mem- ber. Subd. 13. The sale of pull -tabs, tip boards, paddle wheels and raffle tickets when accomplished on the premises of an establishment having a liquor license issued by the City of Janesville for the sale of either on -sale or off -sale intoxicat- ing liquor shall be accomplished by an active member of the conducting organ- ization or auxiliary or the spouse or surviving spouse of an active member of the conducting organization. The pre- ceding notwithstanding, if the person conducting the sale is also the owner or the employee of the establishment where- in space is being rented by the conduct- ing organization, said person may not sell any pull -tabs, raffle tickets, or other charitable gambling supplies while he or she is then on duty with the lessor. Subd. 14. Each organization which is licensed to conduct charitable gambling within the City of Janesville, shall provide the City Administrator with a copy of all financial reports submitted to the State Charitable Gambling Control Board on a quarterly basis if there is any charitable gambling by that organization within the reporting period. Subd. 15. To the extent allowed by Minnesota Statutes, the Council may by resolution set a licensing or permit fee for the conduct of charitable gambling within the City of Janesville. The resolution may set fees for application, processing of any application, including whatever amounts are deemed appropriate to defray the cost of investigation of the proposed applicant by the Council, City Administrator, or Chief of Police and to make a determina- tion of the propriety of granting said license. The City Administrator shall prepare a local application form and shall. include verification that the applicant agrees to abide by the local ordinance concerning the conduct of licensed char- itable gambling. Subd. 16. This Ordinance shall not regulate the conduct of non -licensed gambling as defined by Minnesota Stat- ute Chapter 349 et sec. Subd. 17. Criminal Penalties. Any willful violation of the provisions of this Ordinance constitutes a misdemeanor. Subd. 18. Should any section or subsection of this Ordinance be declared by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid,. such decision shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any part thereof other than the part so declared to be invalid. Subd. 19. Ordinance No. 198 is hereby repealed. Passed by the City Council this 28th day of April, 1986. ®F 31530 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMOUIST EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 MWor PHONE: (612) 454-8100 THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE.WACHTER July 7, 1986 Council Members THOMAS HEDGES City Administrator EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Cletk MR GLEN BARON BLUE BELL ICE CREAM INC 3218 SNELLING AVE MPLS MN 55406 Re: Approval for Blue Bell Ice Cream, Inc. to Operate On Public Streets Within the City of Eagan Dear Mr. Baron: In official action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on Tuesday, July 1, 1986, Blue Bell Ice 'Cream, Inc., was given approval to operate ice cream trucks on public streets throughout the City of Eagan. The action was taken subject to the following conditions: 1) sub- mission of an insurance certificate providing the level of liabil- ities outlined in a letter from Mid -Continent Agencies, Inc., to the City of Eagan dated April 16, 1986; 2) hours of operation Will be noon to 15 minutes prior to sunset; 3) the approval is granted until October 1, 1986; 4) the trucks will not generate a noise level greater than 65 decibels; 5) caution swing arms will be required on each vehicle; 6) local employment will be used for drivers operating in Eagan. The City Council has directed our Police Department to record any and all complaints that may be received regarding operation of the ice cream truck. It is the City Council's desire to consider an ordinance sometime after October 1 that would address the aforementioned conditions and any other language they might desire if food/beverage vehicles are to be allowed in the future. If you have any questions regarding the action taken by the City Council, feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Thomas L. Hedge s City Administrator //7,r cc: Jay Berthe, Chief of Police E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk/Director of Finance THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY :1 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT — ER OF PERMITS ISSUED uilding Electrical Plumbing HVAC Water Softener Signs THIS MONTH 191 JUNE 1986 YEAR-TO-DATE 806 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 1 1 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED IYY�. Af'TlTW-W—!, K7 iiy TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 5 FOUNDATION 2 30.00 -30.00 485 SINGLE FAMILY 105 9,207,500 41,257.00 20,612.50 232,569.25 24 DUPLEX 6 390,000 1,956.00 978.00 12,634.00 117 TOWNHOUSE 26 4,228,600 14,971.00 4,513.50 147,573.50 8 CONDO 1 438,000 1,278.00 639.00 14,304.00 1 APT BLDGS 1 5,760,000 14,583.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 0 AGRICULTURAL 11 COMMERCIAL 2 625,000 1,853.50 926.75 9,566.75 26 COMM/IND REMODEL 5 131,372 795.50 375.50 1,237.50 2 COMM/IND ADDITION 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 INSTITUTIONAL 3 PUBLIC FACILITIES 13 RES. GARAGES 4 26,180 256.00 -- 272.00 12 RES. ADDITIONS 1 5,184 56.50 -- 59.50 9 SWIM POOL 5 45,900 384.50 156.75 565.75 89 MISCELLANEOUS 32 95,216 1,224.50 -- 1,283.00 0 DEMOLISH 1 HOUSE MOVES 1 -- 15.00 =- 15.00 806 TOTALS 191 20,952,952 78,665.50 35,493.50 636,480.75' YEAR-TO-DATE 806 78,467,602 314,353.50 151,072.20 2,121,317.70 iiy PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE JUNE 1986 MDI.TT-FAMTT.V BRFAKDOWN TYPE 0 OF PERMITS # OF BUILDINGS # OF UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 6 3 6 390,000 1,956. 193.00 978.00 $ 12,634.00 4-PLEX 12 3 12 683,600 3,624. 340.00 1,812.00 24,790.00 -S-PLEX 5 1 1 5 345,000 1,700- 172.50 850.00 10,645.00 7-PLEX 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM REI 8 -PLS 9- 5 72 3,022,000 9,202. 1,511.00 1,629.00 105,298.00 APT. BLDG 1 1 144 5,760,000 14,583. 1,538.00 7,291.50 216,370.50 12-PLEX 1 1 12 616,000` 1,723. 308.00 861.50 21,144.50 TOTALS 34 14 251 10,816,600 32,788, 4,062.50 13,422.00 390,882.00 1 l'OMMEACTAI./iNDUSTRT Af- A INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN � BLDG PERMIT STATE PLAN REV PERMIT # ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE SURCHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUP. 08 SIB MEM HWY DAKOTA CTY. 12215 L 123, B 1, CEDARVALE OFC REALTORS $ 13,000 $ 98.50 $ 6.,50 $ 49.25 $ 154.25 COMM REI 12217 1200 YANKEE DOODLE RD FEDERAL LAND 3,500 44.50 2.00 -- 46.50 COMM REI L 1, B 1, TOWN CTR 100 1ST COMPANY 12186 3815 NICOLS RD BRAD RAGIN 30,000 193.00 15.00 96.50 304.50 COMM REI L 2 B 25 SECT 19 TIRE CO 12138 4030 PILOT KNOB RD ST JOHN 15,372 116.50 8.00 58.25 182.75 COMM REI N N NEUMAN.CHURCH 1325 EAGANDALE CT OPUS CORP 69,500 343.00 35.00 171.50 549.50 COMM RE 12152 T. 3 R 1, EAG CTR IND PK #7 12153 680 DIFFLEY RD NW BELL TELE 25,000 170.50 12.50 85.25 268.25 COMM NE 4250 LEXINGTON AVE S LEXINGTON CTR 600,000 1,683.00 300.00 841.50 9,298.50 COMM NE 12172 T. I R I- FAC QTR IqT LTD PARTNER PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORliATION DATE: JUNE 1985 I.n 11 T1 -CA Mi1V PPCAV MLM NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT FEE SUR -PUN CHECK TOTAL FEES TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS I VALUATIONS K pH S N �1 n' 'n y w o w 3259 TERMINAL DR SIBM.M IND UK HENNING ROHD A Aqqnr Y T K y 24 6 24 $ 1,475,000 $ 7,615 IS 737.50 $ 3,807.50 $ 48,160.0 6 -UNIT $ 90.00$ 316.50 3,712.50 OFFICE 10442 4155 L 1 OLD SIB HWY B 1, GROUP W ADD TOWNHOUSE $ 325,00C N $ 162.50$ 497.75 4,878.75 OFC BLD 10479 8 -UNIT CORP CTR DR 62P EAG OIC PK 2 OPUS CORP $2,800,OOC 7,183.00 $ 1,140.00$3,591.50 37,795.50 TOWNHOUSE 10368 1285 L 3, CORP CTR DR B 3, EAG OFC PK SPERRY CORP $ 980,OOC 2,633.00 5 490.00'1,316.50 APT. OR 4,439.50 OFC SPA O O O p O O 282 91900,000 25,299 3,650.00 12,649.50 444,294.51 27 9 306 11,375,000 32,914 4,387.50 16,457.00 1 492,454.51 TOTALS I I I V I I p= 0 0 0 N 0 P 0 u 0 N 0 u 0 Y y 9� m: iF m rn ti _ G m V m P 9 p •o P I I I I p I o f m m O N N p m PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORliATION DATE: JUNE 1985 I.n 11 T1 -CA Mi1V PPCAV MLM BUILDING PERMIT 0 NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT FEE SUR -PUN CHECK TOTAL FEES TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS I VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES I CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES 4 -UNIT $ 66.00 PUB FAC 10474 3259 TERMINAL DR SIBM.M IND UK HENNING ROHD A Aqqnr $ 190,000 658.00 TONNHOUSE 24 6 24 $ 1,475,000 $ 7,615 IS 737.50 $ 3,807.50 $ 48,160.0 6 -UNIT $ 90.00$ 316.50 3,712.50 OFFICE 10442 4155 L 1 OLD SIB HWY B 1, GROUP W ADD TOWNHOUSE $ 325,00C 995.50 $ 162.50$ 497.75 4,878.75 OFC BLD 10479 8 -UNIT CORP CTR DR 62P EAG OIC PK 2 OPUS CORP $2,800,OOC 7,183.00 $ 1,140.00$3,591.50 37,795.50 TOWNHOUSE 10368 1285 L 3, CORP CTR DR B 3, EAG OFC PK SPERRY CORP $ 980,OOC 2,633.00 5 490.00'1,316.50 APT. OR 4,439.50 OFC SPA CONDO 3 3 282 91900,000 25,299 3,650.00 12,649.50 444,294.51 27 9 306 11,375,000 32,914 4,387.50 16,457.00 1 492,454.51 TOTALS BUILDING PERMIT 0 ADDRESS 6 LEGAL OWNER VALUATIONS PERMIT FEE SUR- CHARGE PLAN CHECK FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUPANCI 10331 9200 L 1 PILOT KNOB RD B 25 SECT 27 EASTER LUTH $ 6,400$ 62.50 3.50" - $ 66.00 PUB FAC 10474 3259 TERMINAL DR SIBM.M IND UK HENNING ROHD A Aqqnr $ 190,000 658.00 $ 95.00$ 329.00 5 10,717.00 OFC/WHS 10774 1570 CENTURY POINT B 2 CENTURY ADD J R S CONST $ 180,OOC 633.00 $ 90.00$ 316.50 3,712.50 OFFICE 10442 4155 L 1 OLD SIB HWY B 1, GROUP W ADD GROUP W CAB $ 325,00C 995.50 $ 162.50$ 497.75 4,878.75 OFC BLD 10479 1380 L 2 CORP CTR DR 62P EAG OIC PK 2 OPUS CORP $2,800,OOC 7,183.00 $ 1,140.00$3,591.50 37,795.50 OFFICE 10368 1285 L 3, CORP CTR DR B 3, EAG OFC PK SPERRY CORP $ 980,OOC 2,633.00 5 490.00'1,316.50 4,439.50 OFC SPA t 3—Re C u—�J;e�—, ec�nJ — --? L tt Gly cv 0 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 February 18, 1986 MR KERMIT MCCRAE DISTRICT ENGINEER MNDOT DISTRICT 9 3485 HADLEY AVENUE NORTH BOX 9050 OAKDALE MN 55109 Re: I -35E Access From Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) Dear Kermit: BEA BLOMQUIST Mmor THOMAS EGAN JAMES A. SMITH VIC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES or, Admmltttmor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE Gry Clerk At the regular City Council meeting of February 4, 1986, the Council expressed concern regarding the potential traffic conflict associated with the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road wanting to proceed northbound on I -35E. As a result of these concerns, they directed me to contact your office to get a response to the following questions: 1. Why wasn't a direct "diamond interchange" access ramp provided for northbound I -35E from Yankee Doodle Road instead of the existing "loop" in the southeast quadrant? 2. When does the state plan to install the traffic signal on County Road 28 for the left -turn movement of westbound Yankee Doodle Road onto northbound I -35E? Your review and response to these questions will be appreciated and forwarded to the Council for their information. If any additional explanation is necessary to clarify the Council's concerns, please contact me at your convenience. Si erely, Thomas A. f-ic- Director of Public Works TAC/jj THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYM80L OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY 4104ESOT91, Minnesota Department of Transportation -+ District 9 • ;`�ti, OF �5Q° 3485 Hadley Avenue North, Box 9050 7RP North St. Paul, Minnesota 55109 Telephone 779-1178 March 7, 1986 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 2830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Colbert: SUBJECT: C.S. 1982 (I -35E at Co.Rd. 28) q In response to your two questions in your February 2R, 1986 letter, we provide the following: • 1. The traffic projects that the interchange was designed to accommodate showed that the predominant movement was eastbound Yankee Doodle Road to northbound I -35E. Therefore, the loop was provided to eliminate the left turn conflict that would have resulted with a standard diamond interchange ramp design. 2. A Contract to install traffic signals at this intersection has already been let. Construction will begin this spring with the traffic signals in operation in the late summer. We trust this information answers the Council's questions. Sincerely, Kermit K. McRae, P.E. District Engineer 40 /A ein Equal Opporrunirr Ernplo3er 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 __I July 9, 1986 MR STEVEN Z KAPLAN "% HART, BRUNER, O'BRIEN & THORNTON '1221 NICOLLET MALL SUITE 700 MPLS` MN 55403 - Re: Sanitary Sewer Backup Claim, June 7, 1986 (Yankee Doodle Road) 1542 Aspen Drive Dear Mr. Kaplan: BEA BLOMQUIST My r THOMAS EGAN JAMES A SMITH MC ELLISON THEODORE WACHTER Causal Memb ,, THOMAS HEDGES City Adityo db EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City Clark Mayor Blomquist and Councilman Egan requested that I respond to your letter of June 23 regarding the damages sustained by Peggy "'House`teTh't'1'figto the sanitary sewer backup of June 7. Your comment of apparent "serious and fundamental design deficiencies in the City's sewer system" cannot be substantiated by our review of the sewer system. While we are aware this is the third occurrence of sewer flooding to her home since 1979, the first two occurrences were directly related to construction activities of which the City had no knowledge or control over specific operations that resulted in damage to our sewer line. . With approximately 160+ miles of sanitary sewer.througiout the City, our maintenance crews have set up a routine inspection, cleaning and maintenance of all lines on a repetitive basis. "`This aggressive maintenance program has greatly minimized the number of sanitary sewer backups per mile of system to a very effective level. However, there is no way that the City can predict or prevent future sanitary sewer backups. I am not aware of any situation where the City has been "wholly unresponsive" to Ms. House's request for implementation of corrective measures. We have discussed -various alternatives with her and informed her of options that she may choose to implement if she wishes to achieve a higher level of protection beyond what any other homeowner is provided by our municipal maintenance operations. 1SL/ THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY MR STEVEN ZYKAPLAN JULY 9, 1986 • PAGE 2 It is my understanding that Ms. House has been compensated for past damages by the insurance company representing the contractors responsible for the previous sewer backups. We have also forwarded her most recent claim to the City's insurance agent for investigation and action. In summary, we cannot find any "obviously serious defect" in our .sewer system. We have placed this particular segment of sanitary sewer on a high maintenance schedule and will be televising it in the near future to further verify the integrity of this system. I will be happy to review with you any definitive and positive recommendations you may have regarding our sanitary sewer. collection system. 'FiyvG r.: rI hope that this letter satisfies your request for a prompt response from the City of Eagan regarding this matter. Sincerely, r Director of Pu omas A:yCoIbert; Public Works` •` TAC/JJ cc: Bea Blomquist, Mayor Tom Egan, Councilman Paul Hauge, City Attorney Joe Connolly, Supterintendent of Utilities • M ' 9 1 �.7 • '1� '.' .' UVAU • WORK PERFORMED 5 $ 800 5 ® TypE MAN HOURS 19 8 Fire/Rescue 932 41 $ 800 Training 433 Truck s Equipment Maintenance 163 Station Maintenance 205 Fire Prevention 42 Administrative 499, 2,274 MANPOWER STATION #1 STATION #2 STATION #3 1 1 1 Chiefs 9 4 6 Available Days Available Nights 11 15 9 Available Rotating 2 1 2 On Leave 2 1 0 ® Rookies 0 0 0 =AL 25 22 18 FIRE/RESCUE TYPE Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other NUMBER $ LOSS 5 $ 800 5 2 19 8 2 41 $ 800 LOCATION OCCUPANCY` $ LOSS Sy rI L • EAGAN VOLUNTECR FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MONTH OF March 1966 Fire/Rescue 594 Training 493 Truck & Equipment Maintenance 168 Station Maintenance 120 Fire Prevention 28 Administrative 291 MANPOWER Chiefs Available Days Available Nights Available Rotating On Leave. Rookies TOTAL Structure Grass Vehicle False Medical Other LARGE DOLLAR LASSES DATE NAME ,:• 3/16/86 STATION ql 1 9 11 2 2 0 25 4 2 2 4 10 1 23 LOCATION Coachman Apts. /�TQ STATION #2 1 4 15 1 1 0 22 $ LOSS inn 2,500 2,600 re I r STATION A3 1 6 9 2 0 0 18 < �THEgTr. F f : N11lilfesotg _tea - CJ U of Hwwali June 27, 1986 RFF, E14325-MG9-1S Teresa A. Pivac VS C.i Ly of Fagan r,p@gV �g86 Thomas Hedges, Admin Ci-.I:v bf Fagan 3795 Pilot Knoll Road Fagan, MN 5512.2 Dear Thous:; Hedges: Thr. Departrneul: of Human Rights has made an i-rupart: a'1 i-nqui,Iy Irk10 the .issues ra:i. sed :in Lhe bo lle c.apt Toned cha rye, and has reviewed tkre i.ufounaCi:oit pro.vi-ded In conuect:i.on w'i-th Lite charge. Anal.ys:i.s of the .i.nformaL.Ion available in this rnatLer discloses tha;: the compl,a.ini: of :1 Iegai discr].minatl.orr is wit:}tout rrreri.t. Minn. SI:aC. 3 6 3 . 0 6 , Subd. 4(1.), provides for the Comrnissi.oner's dismissal. of charges which are -found to be without merit.. The char ye has been disrni.ssed pursuant Uo this provision. The Department. will take no further action ory this matter. PurstuanL uo Minn. Stat. 363.14, Subd. 1(b)(1), Lhe charging party may bring a civil action against fire respondent in district court; within 45 days of Lhe dismissal of Lhi.s case. If yore have any questions, you may contact the department, a (612) 296-5669. Since ly, Dr.. Linda C. Johnson Gtrmmiss over AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Enclosures 500 Bremer Tower, 7th Place and Minnesota Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612)296-5663 or (600)652-9747 G� 1yG�GfrI iZ%�� Ref: E1025 MEMOP4h1)UN Rased on the information stated below, this case has b:en DISMISSED pursuant to the authority vested in the Conunissioner by Minnesota Statutes 363.06 subd. 4 (1). 1. A review of the qualifications, experience, and education of - the applicants hired for the positions in question indicates that these factors, ;rid not an illegal consideration. of sex, were the criteria used by respondent to select the successful candidates, since all persons hired possessed higher qualifications for the position than did charging party. It is not. the intent of'Lhe Minnesota tiuman Rights Act to prevent an employer from using any nondiscriminatory criteria it desires in making personnel der_isinns. 2. Charging party stated that she had speculated that respondent might screen applications subjectively because she has reason to believe a neighboring municipality has done' CO. 3. TPue b;iraiesot.n 14um&n--Rights Act pruvi(les that the eigplewuent of one pe: -son in place of another, standing by itself, shall not be evidence of an unfair discriminatory practice. /902 a^a c0L!A I_ Cl:'PORTUN!TY Ev PLOYER 607 F; s.er 'c'+; sr, -','n P:a'e a.; Mlnne sola Street St rein, himnesofa 55101 Ic X7) 9°5625 or(EOQ)65e' 9741