No preview available
 /
     
09/16/1986 - City Council Regularn U ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 1'986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR 'Item Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deerfield Addition and Town Centre 70 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS .`Item L. Approve Final Plat, Park Knoll Addition Item 2. Approve Amendment to TIF Program and Development Agreement (Sperry Consolidation Facility) 141 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deerfield Addition and Town Centre 70 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Approve Final Plat, Park Knoll Addition Item 2. Approve Amendment to TIF Program and Development Agreement (Sperry Consolidation Facility) 141 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY There are no items to be considered under the City Attorney at this time. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deerfield Addition and Town Centre 70 --The City Planning Department has processed two environmental worksheets, one for Deerfield Addition and the second for Town Centre 70. - According to the City Planner the Town Centre 70 Environmental Assessment Worksheet is the first environmental review where comments have been significant in regard to potential impact for environmental concerns. To further addressthis ssue, Dale has prepared a memo which is attached on pagesthrough ( In addition to the memo, copies of letters from the Minnesota Polution Control Agency are als provided for City Council review and referenced as pages athrough /617 There appear to be questions raised at the last joint /Planning Commission/City Council meeting regard- ing the purpose of indirect source permits. The City Attorney's office was asked to provide a summary of legislative authority background, and a summary regarding the involvement of the Minnesota Polution Control Agency and the issuance of indirect source permits. This, legal summary is enclosed on pages/'Q through P- $ for your review. _ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the City staff regarding a resolution to resolve any and all environmental concerns associated with the Town Centre- 70 develop- ment or suggest an environmental impact statement that would address the full impacts of this development and surrounding developments. , /67- DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Approve Final Plat, Park Knoll Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Park Knoll Addition located north of Wilderness Run Road, just east of Oakwood Heights Addition as shown on page The final plat conforms with the preliminary plat appro edby Council action on March 19, 1986. All conditions of the preliminary plat approval have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the. Park Knoll Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 2. Approve Amendment to T.I.F. Program and Development Agreement (.Sperry Consolidation Facility) --In reviewing the legal documents associated with the tax increment financing (TIF) and the development agreement, the attorney for Sperry Corporation discovered that the legal description used in both items did not fully incorporate the improvements associated with the parking lot facilities or the future trailway. Because these improvements add value to the property which should be taken into consideration in the TIF program, it is appropriate that the legal description be revised to accurately reflect the entire scope of all proposed improvements. If this legal description is revised in the TIF program, it is necessary to also revise the development agreement due to its cross reference. Therefore, an amendment has been prepared jointly by the City Attorney and the Sperry Corporation and is being presented to the Council for consideration and approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment to the TIF program and development agreement for the Sperry Consolidation Facility. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 143 rJ MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR DEERFIELD ADDN. & TOWN CENTRE 70 The City has processed two Environmental Worksheets. The first is Deerfield Addition consisting of 324 dwelling units. The comments submitted from the state agencies are minor, and the only major comment was that a sewer extension be obtained by the developer. With this being the major issue, staff can recommend that a negative declaration for the Deerfield Addition be granted and that no Environmental Impact Statement would be required for this project. Staff will forward these comments back to the commenting agencies as to the status of this project. The Town Centre 70 Environmental Assessment Worksheet is the first environmental review where comments have been significant in regard to potential impact for environmental concern. The first agency to comment was the Minnesota Department of Transportation where concerns have been raised regarding the drainage of the development into the right-of-way ditch system for I -35E. MnDOT indicated a permit must be obtained for this additional drainage. The second item of concern deals with the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road where MnDOT has indicated that a substantial amount of congestion is expected at this intersection because of the lack of internal roadway systems which lead around this major intersection. MnDOT has indicated that once the volume of traffic increases, traffic control devises will be placed on the ramps to the Interstate system. Comments submitted from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency indicate potential carbon monoxide and traffic problems at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. Measures in the traffic report of the EAW suggested an additional turn lane, which may or may not be feasible geometrically to construct and if, in fact, this would mitigate the problem for the traffic generated for this development and other developments in the area. The City had indicated they were contemplating the possibility of doing an overall traffic study which would include the concerns of the Pollution Control Agency. Once the total impact has been determined, then mitigative measures could then be described as to how to resolve the potential problem at Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads. This is the first time that major concerns have been raised in an EAW that have not had definite mitigative measures or solutions attached through this process. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has indicated that the traffic study proposed by the City would be a step to try to resolve potential impacts. If the City does not elect to fund or do a traffic study, the City should then require that Federal Land provide dditional traffic information in W THOMAS L HEDGES SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 PAGE 2 order that questions can be answered in regard to the level of congestion at Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. If a resolution cannot be made as to how these impacts will be addressed and what mitigative measures will be required, it would then be a suggestion that an Environmental Impact Statement should be done in order to address the full impacts of this development and surrounding development. Therefore, the alternatives in regard to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet would. be to indicate to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency that the City will look at the intersections of Pilot Knob Road/Yankee Doodle Road as to ultimate design, number of trips generated and what improvement measures would be required for this maximum design consideration. If the City elects not to do the traffic study and resolve the mitigative measures issued, then an Environmental Impact Statement should be required in order that all impacts can be addressed for this development proposal. City Plan er DCR/jj %Is It �`NN Tq RECEIVED AUG 2 S 99$fi O y V ° Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 �OF pe Phone 296-1251 August 25, 1986 Dale Runkle, Planning Director City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: ';Town Centre 70,`- City of Eagan Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) District 9 (Eagan, Dakota Co.) Dear Mr. Runkle: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has completed a review of the above -referenced EAW. We believe that the proposed project will have some adverse impacts on our transportation facilities. Our main concerns include the following: I. Mn/DOT requires a utility permit for any development adjacent to Mn/DOT right-of-way. We anticipate that a development of this nature will increase the amount of runoff that drains into Mn/DOT property. Since the proposed development is adjacent to Interstate (I)„_35; wetherefore,, requestthatpthe:'.City_of'Eagan;,.obtain'a:;_; c3rainage�pei°mi—t before „beginning thisrojep . _p - II. Mn/DOT has for some time communicated our concern to the City of Eagan that the combination of„ov,er;'?deyelopmeftt: may not be tt e9 .sp will'�,:create;traff Knob.:Road.interse the impact of eac area. Mitigation i criti;. � lca d.ntersec ,.... ;problgms sat:the�;o However, our main ional development at --tnis ;rimes e., �.. e.;Doodle/P,ilgt concern, is in the Eagan ffic'svolumes=a When the proposed development begins to affect the operations of 135E ramps and loops, Mn/DOT will implement traffic control measures necessary to ensure the continued safe operation of our transportation system. These traffic measures may cause additional traffic congestion on Yankee Doodle or Pilot Knob Roads. 1W6 An Equal Opporrunny Employer f �k Dale Runkle Page 2 August 25, 1986 III. It is Mn/DOT's understanding that Rainbow Foods, two fast foot restaurants, and part of the retail center have already been built. It is not clear in the EAW whether these buildings were analyzed as part of the proposed development. It seems too late to analyze the potential impacts these existing buildings will have when they have already been built. If you have any questions concerning Mn/DOT's comments, please contact Jerry Skelton, Planning Coordinator at our District Office in Oakdale phone number (612) 779-1210. Sincerely, Cheryl Heide, Environmental Coordinator Environmental Services Section August 27, 1986 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Mr. Dale Runkle Planning Director 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Runkle: Re: Town Centre 70 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has reviewed the environmen- tal assessment worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Town Centre 70 project located in Eagan, and has the following comments to offer. Although a noise problem is not anticipated due to the lack of residential receivers, the noise analysis is incomplete. The FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model was used to predict the L50 noise levels, however this model does not involve L50 data. Therefore the methodology used in computing the L50 numbers needs to be documented. Additionally, the L10 noise level numbers are missing from the noise analysis and need to be included. Regarding air quality concerns, a substantial potential exists for impacting I -35E and other surounding roadways unless this project is carefully planned. The carbon monoxide (CO) analysis is based on trip reduction factors which are not particularly conservative according to nationally accepted standards. Additionally, MPCA staff in the air quality division feel that the second left turn lane at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road (as noted on p. 17) may not be geometrically possible and may not solve traffic flow problems. Therefore, the CO estimates on p. 16 may not be correct since they rely on that second left turn lane. MPCA staff has learned that Eagan is con- ducting a traffic study for this area. The cooperation of the developer of Town Centre 70 with this study could certainly aid in a solution for this intersec- tion. When such a solution is developed, an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) should be applied for. No further construction should occur on the site until the ISP is received. 1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-2785 Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer// BOO. (O Mr. Dale Runkle Page 2 Please contact Marlene Voita of my staff at 296-7796 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, oCr . Anderson Director Office of Planning & Review CTA/JP:njm cc: Mr. J. David Thornton, Division of Air Quality Mr. John Seltz, Division of Air Quality Mr. Steve Schwanke, City of Eagan Ms. Susanne Pelly, Division of Air Quality Mr. Dave Kelso, Division of Air Quality HAUGE, EIDE & HELIX R. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER VIEW OFFICE TOWER. SUITE 303 1200 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55123 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Indirect Source Permits/City of Eagan Dear Tom: September 3, 1986 AREA CODE 912 TELEPHONE 459-9000 454-4224 The question as to the City of Eagan's involvement in Pollution Control Agency issued Indirect Source Permits covering facilities, building structures, etc., has raised several questions by City staff. The purpose of this letter is to cite certain related issues that may be helpful to the City Council and the staff in dealing with ISP's relating to new development in the future. Legislative Authority 1. Statutory authority for the issuance of indirect source permits by the Minnesota PCA is found under M.S.A. 116.06 et. seq. 2. The PCA under 116.07, subd. 2, has the obligation to adopt standards of air quality and shall take into account various factors such as existing physical conditions, zoning classifications,, topography, prevailing wind conditions and residential industrial nature of the area. Cities may set standards of air quality that are more stringent than those set by the PCA. 3. In addition, 116.07, subd. 4, provides that the PCA may adopt, amend, and rescind rules and standards regarding air pollution. 4. M.S.A. 116.07, subd. 4.a. provides that the PCA may issue permits under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for the emission of air contaminants, etc. 5. M.S.A. 116.05 allows all State departments and agencies to enter into the necessary agreements with Cities, etc. to control pollution under Chapter 116. /76 Mr. Thomas Hedges September 3, 1986 Page 2 Background 1. -The issue dealing with the Indirect Source Permit issue has been found in Minnesota Statutes since about 1977, but apparently it's only very recently that the PCA has been taking a much stronger stand concerning the provisions of the permits, and has attempted to involve the affected municipality. Questions 1. Does the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under existing statutes and rules, have the authority to name a City as a co -permittee on an Indirect Source Permit? If the answer is yes, should the City accept the responsibility as a co -permittee under terms outlined by the Pollution Control Agency or through a negotiated process with the PCA and assume the obligations that are placed upon the City, both on the short-term including construction costs, and on the long-term covering administrative and monitoring responsibilities? 2. Should the City object and refuse to act as a co -permittee in the ISP process? Issues of General Concern 1. Ordinarily a City may not act unless it has specific legislative authority to do so. It may be argued the PCA can, under Chapter 116, force cities to comply with standards, regulations and rules, but may not be able to force a City to affirmatively act, including construction of additional roadways to comply with ISP standard and perform extraordinary monitoring and administrative duties in the future. 2. The approach that the PCA has taken is that it will unilaterally act on the permit and does not need to enter into an agreement with either the applicant or the City in enforcing its will in this respect. In one case in Bloomington, the PCA acted without Bloomington's input whatsoever, on a negotiated basis solely with the developer. It appears that this will not happen in the future. 3. The City has not been an applicant in the process but has been brought in as a party. /7/ Mr. Thomas Hedges September 3, 1986 Page 3 4. Should the City adopt an ordinance covering ..the regulations or amend its development and subdivision ordinance to provide for a continuation of the obligations of the developer for costs, etc. for the indirect source permit. The objective is that the City as a co -permittee, will have continuing obligations and an agreement was prepared with the Wachovia developers covering extraordinary costs to be paid by the developer, and its successors, over the period of the effectiveness of the permit. 5. .Under Rule 7001.130, there are a group of conditions that can be included in the permit and these provisions should be followed closely in the negotiating process with the PCA staff. 6. Any planned development agreement or ordinance or both, should possibly provide that all information required to be submitted to the PCA by the applicant, should also be submitted to the City, and that there may be a requirement for the on-going submission of information at the time of commencement of the planned development agreements, development agreements, or the application for building permits. 7. Another issue is the provision that the developer would notify the City of assignment ofits interest in a development. One problem with this may be that when a developer has sold or developed all of its interest in a development, there of course, would be no further responsibility by the developer and there may no longer be an applicant permittee in existence for the City to look to for ultimate responsibility for payment of extraordinary costs. 8. It is important, obviously, that the City make certain that the development is done in an orderly manner and in compliance with state regulations, including the ISP permit regulations which of course will have a long-term effect on the development and growth of the City. In addition, the regulations could very well change and the effect of such rule changes would also have to be assessed from time to time relating to developments that are already commenced and in process. Summary 1. It is obvious that the PCA has taken a fairly strong stand concerning the issuance of ISP's and the unilateral grant of the permit is the position that the PCA has taken to date. Clearly, MSA 116.05, subd. 1 provides that all state departments should cooperate with local municipalities relating to the issuance of permits. By definition, 116.06, subd. 8 defines person to include applicants and municipalities. //y Mr. Thomas Hedges September 3, 1986 Page 4 2. Unfortunately, there is no precedent in case law or specific provision in the statute or PCA promulgated rules about cities being required to be co - permittees. The PCA's position is that its rule-making authority give it the right to require cities to so act. 3. I have talked with Jocelyn Olson of the Attorney General's office assigned to the PCA at #296-7343 and she indicated that although there may be some argument concerning the City's role and duties, the PCA has taken a strong position in respect to the City's position. I have also talked with the Bloomington City Attorney, Floyd Olson, and the Assistant Bloomington City Administrator, Larry Lee, who have been involved deeply with the PCA regarding the Mega Mall ISP. Although they have strong reservations about the City acting as a co -permittee, they feel it's important that the City be involved in the negotiation of the issuance of the permits and generally the developers are extremely anxious to move forward, which does not give an opportunity for a challenge if there is the concern that the PCA is being overly demanding. 4. One method of handling such a challenge would be to put together a shell proposal and submit the permit through the process and then challenge the PCA's authority by an appeal to the District Court. This would be costly and the outcome would be somewhat uncertain. 5. I would suggest a meeting with City staff to formulate some guidelines concerning how to handle the PCA permits as the issue arises. PHH:ras cc: Dale Runkle Steve Schwanke /73 yours., b KELLER, P.A. Paul H. Hauge PARK KNOLL ADDITION lea �s N 89'55754'W \,KTA vi MTHTHE E sidA, I:, Avs 454 39 t,O / ♦♦ Awa Uro .�\ ,\ �`4` rP.eS f• qb /,'�. m`0; ° h \; � ♦ �/ too �L �`� �e ,.` � VICINITY MAP 1 • I e� r A. SCALE JA SEC 16, . 14 ADE 13 NORTH \ [ p d SCALE IN _FEET 3.•f poo i��.��.\ \• •\/°Ss /�'�' ///' �� 't:• 'e°w �-. 6A0`D Iw - So— o bo iao �� ^ / (� � �''�� .,� � � E . QP ,, / VO 5'e • ,'/ ` d,,. a °'is ��T)D\e s62` � � i ' a• r• Ee S. �r `/ ° / f .e �' / _ 3F, / MA"AGE Gro UrFus.,.EASEMENTS {�} ARE SHOWN THUS d R 3/ o:dy 9t• °e./l to 1p IDI ID Z� Sevvsst �•. CN a •• j ;,j .� V ,e\•Op G_, 6[v41 5 [En iA y.01. r.40 1 / Sw•e s, 1 /.�t j\ /� -` ``p� / UHuss oT.Enas[ / ~ 'ADwJTEO pw'HE'LAT SS;w_�-s�.dPc.,i- Ot P p.1SSy, z3odvr / A�A K. R° i XHIBIT "A" AGENDA — REGULAR MEETING ,EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 6:30 P.M. 1 I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES />o�`• OO III. 6:40 - KIDS -'N -KINSHIP PROCLAMATION IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT MAD BUSINESS ('3:5 A. Parks & Recreation Department p� (� B. I� Cable Commission v. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA a1� A. •(4 B. Contractor's Licenses Personnel Items Poa.15 C. Contract 85-25, Final Payment/Acceptance (Rahn & Ridgecliff Parks Parking Lots and Trailways Surfacing �.I D. Project 485, Receive Petition/Order Report and Plans (Lexington Square 6th Addition) E. Project 484, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Burr Oak Addition) F. Approve Final Plat, Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition BOG. Approve Resolution Requesting Connection Permit to MWCC Sewer (Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition) Fa.-.xH. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 70 - 5th Addition VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer (continued from July 15, 1986, City Council meeting) ea ',:7a B. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 428, Kennebec Drive - Streets & Utilities fw�SS C. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 429, Town Centre 70 & 100 Additions - Streets & Utilities S4o D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 417, Birchpark Addition - Streets r� S7N E. & Utilities Final Assessment Hearing, Project 419, Slaters Acres - Streets & Utilities (p0 F. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 423, Group W Cable Addition - Streets P Final Assessment Hearing, Project 433, Lexington Square 2nd Addition p - Trunk Storm & Sanitary Sewer H. Public Hearing for Vacation of a Portion of Eagan Industrial Road Public Hearing for Proposed 1987 General Operating Budget 1 VI. OLD BUSINESS p ^,CJ A. Conditional Use Permit for Liquor License at the Compri Hotel, \ U Prism Hotel Management Located on Lots 1,2,&3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park & Outlet A of Eagandale Office Park,. South of I-494 & East of Pilot Knob Road, NW 1/4 of Section 3 (continued from August 19, 1986, City Council meeting) VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1 q-1\ A. Bow & Arrow Hunting Season Clarification PJ'•J�oB. Waiver of Plat (Metropolitan Waste Control Commission) to Split a a5.36 Acre Parcel from a 32 Acre parcel Known as Tract C, Located West of Hwy 13 & NW of Commanche Road, NW 1/4 of Sec 17 p.,..��C. Rezoning (Michael R. Wills) from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single v Family) for Lots 6 - 13, Block 1, Killdeer Addition, Located East of T.H. 49 Abutting Joyce Court, NW 1/4 of Sec 12 p $l, D. Preliminary Plat for Town Centre 100 Third Addition (Federal Land \ Company) Consisting of 2 Lots and 2 Outlets on Approximately 2.5 Acres Located on Lot 1, Block 1, & Outlots C & D of Town Centre 100 First Addition, South of Yankee Doodle Rd Abutting Lexington Ave, Q NE 1/4 of Sec 15 pA, `\E. Preliminary Plat for Fairway Hills 2nd Addition (Derrick Land \ Company) Consisting of 59 Single Family Lots on Approximate 25 Acres, Located SE Quadrant of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads, NW 1/4 of Sec 34 F. Preliminary Plat for Sunpointe (Advance Developers) Consisting of 90 Townhouse Units on Approximately 10.5 Acres Located West of Blackhawk-Road Abutting Diffley Road, SW 1/4 of Sec 20 Preliminary Plat for Johnny Cake Ridge Fifth Addition (Good Value Homes Inc) Consisting of 12 Townhouse Units on Approximately 4 Acres, Located South of Cliff Road & East of Johnny Cake Ridge Road, NW 1/4 of Sec 33 I%. ADDITIONAL ITERS A. Public Improvement Contracts: e� 13a 1. Contracts 86-21 & 86-22, Receive Bids/Award Contracts (Lighting - Parking Lot) 2. Contract 86-23, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) 3. Contract 86-24, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Towerview Road & Highview Avenue) p*1\3(.4. Contract 86-25, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Burr Oaks \ V Addition) B. Private Improvement Contracts: 1. Project 85 -BB, Final Acceptance (R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition) ,x,6•(31 2. Project 85 -RR, Final Acceptance (Rahn Ridge Addition) P v\"c Comparable Worth Update X. VISITORS TO BE BEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %I. ADJOURNMENT IV MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION ..APPROVE MINUTES/AGENDA After approval is given to the September lb, 1986 .agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the September 2, 1986 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration': Kids -'N -Kinship Proclamation --The City from the Kids -'N -Kinship asking that 40 the week of September 21 through 28 as of Eagan. For a copy f the letter to pages ,7- through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM•: 21 through 28 as National Kinship Week. *1 has received a request Mayor Blomquist proclaim Kinship Week in the City and proclamation, refer To. proclaim September Kids -`N -Kinship 1509 E Crystal Lk Rd. Burnsville, MN 55337 Mayor A,.. City of • Kinship is a volunteer friendship program for children needing stable adult companionship. The National Kinship Advisory Board declared September 21 - 28 as National Kinship Week to help promote the program. Our Governor has signed a proclamation proclaiming September 21 - 28 as Minnesota Kinship Week. Di'eclore DICK '& CAROL FRICK 1509 E- Crystal L4 Rd Ownuille. MN 55337 (612) 035-7769 Kids -'N -Kinship, serving the youth of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Farmington, Lakeville, and Rosemount, would like to have the Mayor sign our local proclamation declaring Kinship Week in the City of We would like about three minutes time at the ® Council meeting to present the proclamation to theVMayor eb sign. Thank you, Kids -'N -Kinship Board Booklet enclosed 9 41fte'�" A PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Kids -'N -Kinship was founded in February of 1972 by ®' individuals understanding the need of the youth in the community. WHEREAS, Kids -'N -Kinship is a volunteer friendship program that finds a common interest between adult volunteers and children which have been referred to our program. WHEREAS,.Kids-'N-Kinship is available to children within the community of Eagan regardless of race, creed, color or financial status. THEREFORE, I, Bea Bloomquist, Mayor of Eagan, do hereby proclaim September 21 - 28,. 1986 as Kinship Week in the community. NOW, THEREFORE, I urge citizens to acquaint themselves with the principals and objectives of Kids -'N -Kinship. IN TESTIMONY„ WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand proclaiming ®' KIDS -'N -KINSHIP WEEK this Sixteenth Day of September, Nineteen Hundred Eighty -Six. MA MAYOR BEA BLOOMQUIST L N F1ZJ eNbS1)l P J1 caring and sfiaavng yroyaan, for ymtk KIDS -IN -KINSHIP " 1509 E. Crystal LK. RD. Burnsville, Mn. 55337 Phone 612-435-7769 "• A nonprofit organization, -totally. ;!I volunteer. We have no paid staff. A KINSMAN'S PRAYER Lord; let me remember that euery day - I q Children are born who will lose their way. And in their frailty from far and wide; Let them draw near... • to my side. That I may share the gifts that are mine; And forget not; these children are Thine. •, �i Edward J. Lisner If you are a single person, couple, or'family, we have'a child waiting for you to be their "Special Friend". For further information and applications please contact / Carol Frick 435-7769 C Kathy Tannehill 432-2449 , Ed Lisner 454-8355• DO IT NOW ,THE NEED IS GREAT O00 •. 0 O I. MW IMiJ L1 L1NI M �V W i L N F1ZJ eNbS1)l P J1 caring and sfiaavng yroyaan, for ymtk THE INGREDIENTS OF KINSHIP Y,,,.INDNESS'AND UNDERSTANDING MPROVING THE ADULT -CHILD RELATIONSHIP EVER LETTING A CHILD DOWN HARING A LITTLE OF YOUR,,5I TIME AND LOVE AVING FUN WITH YOUR CHILD NCREASING A CHILD'S SELF-CONFIDENCE ROVIDING STABLE COMPANIONSHIP Kinship is a preventative program. The goals and objectives are to provide the friendship and guidance a child needs to avoid serious problems in the future. It is important for these children to be exposed to different environments and to give them chance to do some of the things i they are unable to do because of their present situation. What is Kinship Kinship is a friendship program for children $ to 16 years of age who have a need for stable adult companionship. Where are the children from The children are referred to us by professional people in our area such as counselors, teachers, public health nurses, caseworkers, and mothers who realize their children need this help. The areas served are Apple Valley, 'Burnsville, Eagan',.Farmington, Lakeville, and Rosemount. I Who is involved as volunteers Single men and women,.couples, and families who have an interest in working with children. i What is expected of a volunteer To accept the child as he is, be his "Special Friend", and maintain a once a week contact with him... preferably for at least a year's time. KINSHIP IS FUNANDREWARDING !:: • Agenda Information Memo,, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --The City of Eagan has received notification that our LAWCON/LCMR Grant for Thomas Lake Park was ranked number one for all metropolitan communities and that funding in the amount of" $330,000 should be certain for this project. The total project cost is $4,50,000 of which the City's match is $120,000 from funds that exist in the Park Site Fund. For a map and the estimated .development cost for Thomas Lake Community Park improvements refer to pages G through For a copy of background information and the resolution was prep red by the Director of Parks and Recreation refer to pages = through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny adoption of a resolution that authorizes the filing of the application and execution of grant project agreement with the State of Minne- sota to complete all grant d'ocumehtation on the Thomas Lake project. i .a,d.d3+1a4�8Jrod wfs-<"�c�+ns"+��d'.�ia.!nrt.�rn:a y�•sa.sa.;.� > s - - r •v. _y ,._r>L,�y-�1 ...., +�,.., .- �'i rll:.a: r, T - 'f�If (yt'rl�+V, Jy{y\,�,[n' � •q4 •e���r� � .\l \ ��f .. - �.! � � - N:/y'F'"'F-�'. 41't�"el'7Ck F-" �• l to �, s f f " s ..' r1 k x44 �� �: r• 1 +r4ri r 1} S r; `LutfwoHj� k � til �� �� �-- +. � «, � � v � Ys' '" � ,,:; I Q �- 1 r • llbtu a.�l.�y -."c t: ' t a kr �" -1 <F f j Y �.i�9 I. ) ,•.� 1 r•_ 1 r - ca n � ami yam\ _ ' °v' 11:,:\`� a II, / - .'�•� '�`J{/� / y \ �I, ' \ Ct MI.1 a:Yl' a 1 -u!\ -_.� �I////1//1��//)/ � _ - ,•l• � � G...- �i �_� , 0 l� fc wiCM N6{ck`�jrSl't•wr"�'rfr Cf1•i•�2tvr 7 —j coi C -N. p \ _//; Lu � r .5. - ' .r, w �. ' , 1 1� , r l+lr+. •x \ '. pr txt ' - -�� 't'3.• k° ,us THOMAS LAKE COMMUNITY PARK .I IINARY DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE Quantity Facility/Improvement Cost . Grading and General Sitework $66,000. • Utilities 34,000 Roadways and Parking Lots 60,000. 6,200 L.F. Bituminous Trails 50,000. 2,200 L.F. Aggregate Trails 5,500. Turf Establishment 49,000. Landscaping 30,000. 1 Park Building/Restrooms•" 60,000. 1 Fishing Pier 10,000. 1 Fishing/Observation Wharf 10,000. 2 Pedestrian Bridges- 22,000. 1 Observation Deck 8,000. 1 Nature Blind 4,500. 1 Interpretive Plaza 20,000. Boat ramp and Launch 7,000. Signage 4,000. Security Lighting 10,000. • TOTAL: $450,000. 7 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 - LAWCON/LCMR GRANT THOMAS LAKE PARK Backaround At the recommendation of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, the City Council had previously approved an application for grant assistance for the development of Thomas Lake Community Park. A preliminary application was submitted and recently Staff learned that Eagan's application was ranked number one for metropolitan communities. This ranking should insure funding of the project based on current federal and state funding • of the LAWCON and LCMR Program. Action Required A final application must now be prepared and submitted by October 24 to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development Grants Section and the National Parks Service for review. Typically, LCMR concurrence with the project would happen in December and National Park Service concurrence in January of 1987. Final contract agreements would be completed in February, in time for a spring start of construction. The Council is asked to approve submission of the final grant application and to approve the attached Resolution. The City will be seeking $225,000 in LAWCON funds and $105,000 in •LCMR funds for a total of $330,000. The City will provide $120,000 in matching funds from the Park Site Fund for a total project cost of $450,000. FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve the attached Resolution for submission of the grant application for the development of Thomas Lake Community_ Park. rector of Parks and Recreat KV/mc CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN AUTHORIZING FILING OF APPLICATION AND EXECUTION OF GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP OPEN SPACE UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT AND THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCES FUND. WHEREAS, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural Resources Fund provides for the making of grants to assist local governments in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan desires to develop certain land known as Thomas Lake Community Park, which 'land is to be held and used for permanent open space; and WHEREAS, in order for the proposed project to be eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation plan and five-year action program (capital improvement); and WHEREAS, it is estimated -that the cost of developing said interest shall be $450,000.00; and WHEREAS, upon project approval, the, City of Eagan must enter into formal grant project agreements with the state for the specific purpose of developing Thomas Community Lake Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN:. That an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Parks -and Recreation Grants Section for a grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund of 1965, as amended, for an amount presently estimated to be $225,000.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of cost from other funds available to it. 2. That an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of • Energy and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section, for a grant from the Natural Resources Fund (Minnesota Laws, 1985, Chapter 13, Section 31, Subdivision 5, paragraph a, for an amount presently estimated at $105,000.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of the cost from other funds available to it. 3. That the Mayor of the City Council and the City Administrator are directed to execute and file: a) such application and the 5 -year action program with the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section and to provide additional information and furnish such documents as may be required by said Department; and b) to act as the authorized correspondents of the applicant. 4. That the proposed development is in accordance with plans for the allocation of land for open space uses and that should said grant be made, the applicant will develop and retain said land for use(s) designated in said application and approved by the National Park Service and the Department of Energy and Economic Development. 5. That the United States of America and the State of Minnesota be and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the 9 regulations of the Department of Interior, effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504; Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity. 6. That the City of Eagan enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section, to provide such grants as are specified in numbered paragraphs 1 and 2, above, for the years 1986 - 1988. 7. That the Mayor of the City Council and the City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute such agreement and any supplemental agreements thereof. CITY OF EAGAN CITY - COUNCIL By: Its Mayor • Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Gene VanOverbeke, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true • and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Eagan at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 16th day of September, 1986, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. Gene VanOverbeke, City City of Eagan /O Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three B. CABLE Cable Commission --Ralph Campbell is .expected to be answer any questions regarding the sale transaction that ing through the Joint Cable Commission at this time. tional information on this item refer to the informative present to is proceed - For addi— memo. Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four There are eight (8) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTORS' LICENSES A. Contractors' Licenses --Attached on page /3 is a list of the contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their clients' permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: contractors' licenses as presented. _To approve the list of • • CONTRACTORS LICENSES SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. HARVEY H BRAUN CONST 2. HEATHERWOOD HOMES INC 3. WILLARD HOFF 4. JALCO CONST CO INC 5. P.C. KENNEDY 6. NATIONAL MINERALS CORP 7. PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE CO • 8. ROCHON CORPORATION HOMEOWNER 1. DAVID KELLY PLUMBERS 1. ELANDER PLBG CO INC 2. HOVDE PLBG & HTG • 3. JERRY'S PLBG 4. JOE'S PLBG & HTG 5. DAN JOHNSON PLBG Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items --There are three (3) items to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. 1. Compost Site Monitor --A vacancy exists for the part-time seasonal position of compost site monitor. It is the recommendation of Administrative, Assistant Hohenstein that Lori Belz be hired for this seasonal position.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Lori Belz for the position of part-time seasonal compost site • monitor. 2. Clerk—Typist/Protective Inspections --Approximately 40 applications were received for the vacant position of Clerk Typist in the Protective Inspections Department. Twelve applicants were given typing, written and telephone testing. From these, five applicants were selected for interviewing. Interviews were conducted by Chief Building Official Peterson, Inspections/Parks Secretary Severson and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Cheryl Malmanger be hired to fill the vacant position subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Cheryl Malmanger as a clerk -typist in the Protective Inspections Department, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 3. Car Allowance for City Administrator --The City Administrator is givencar allowance in lieu of using a City vehicle. Car allowance for 19'85 was $'38'3 per month. The 1986 budget was adopted with an appropriation that would allow up to $416 per month. Due to an oversight that the car allowance was not included as a part of compensation adjustment in January/February and with other business at hand the absence of this item for City Council review has continued all year. The Consumer Price Index for Minneapolis/St. Paul for all urban consumers during 1985 was 3.88. Utilizing this adjustment for the car allowance the monthly increase should be $15. This is less than the budgeted amount, however seems reasonable considering the CPI for gasoline is 3.7. The car allowance is intended to cover all expenses .including depreciation, maintenance, insurance and other expenses. This increase is retroactive to cover all expenses incurred during 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a car allowance increase of 3.88 for cal qar year 1986 for the City Administrator. [ Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six CONTRACT 85-25, FINAL PAYI;WNT/ACCEPTANCE C. Contract 85-25, Final Payment/Acceptance (Rahn & Ridgecliff Parks Parking Lots and Trailways Surfacing) --The Director of • Parks and Recreation is recommending final payment acceptance for Rahn and Ridgecliff Parks parking lot and trail paving. The work has been reviewed and accepted as performed by Valley Paving. The original contract amount was $84,418.75 which was revised to $84,183.55. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the work as completed for City Contract 85-25 and make final payment to Valley Paving in the amount of $4,209.18. 1_15� Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting. Page Seven PROJECT 485, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER REPORT & PLANS D. Project 485, Receive Petition/Order Report & Plans (Lexington Square 6th Addition) --The staff has received a petition requesting, the upgrading of Northview Park Road with streets and utilities to service the Lexington Square 6th Addition. In addition to guaranteeing the cost of the feasibility report, the petitioner has extended that guarantee in requesting simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications for this improvement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of report and plans for Project 485 (Lexington Square 6th Addition - Northview Park Road). • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 484/BURR OAK ADDITION E. Project 484, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Burr Oak Addition --At the September 2 Council meeting, the Council accepted a petition from the developer of the Burr Oak Addition to have the installation of streets and utilities to the first phase of Burr Oaks performed under a City contract. Subsequently, staff has initiated the preparation of the feasibility report for the public hearing process in anticipation of holding formal public hearing on October 21. Due to the fact that the plans and specifications had already been prepared by the developer's private engineer, it was possible for the staff to quickly complete the detailed feasibility report which is being presented this evening in consideration of scheduling that public hearing for October 21. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 484 (Burr Oak Addition) and order the public hearing to be held October 21, 1986. l7 • • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine APPROVAL FINAL PLAT - EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK F. Approve Final Plat, Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition (Compri 'Hotel) located on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive as referenced by the final plat on page This final plat conforms with the preliminary plat approv d by Council action on July 15, 1986. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • Ypr.l Y• _ _a. N r. •w 0 0 EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH ADDITION • IyY _IYW: 1.I ly Olrnllx VI••; 1`11 YYWI (wrl. I • uxlu Ywxr., �r w.Vr YI. ww w 1. rlo '.�Itr�n.n• Irluu rr, w YYx •. Ir•\1.•1 rnv .w, x.r.W 1. 1_... IIx 1. IWryl 11.11• IVII r tx•r,. InY �WY11. •u1 IlY Y1y111W W:•IIY ur1 • r. wl u. u.ii...1r•y 1: Ir ..Lw. ...1 rw , w1:.••i.�.IW�rY1.. rx 1�•r� w Y 1 1 WY1- YII[Iw n111Yr 1•.�•••Is �1 w •1u w•1•In Y r•w Iw11 _ u 11.1 1 w xryY•1 1 •111^ Y xrx wr I ly •.Irwl. VIYI \III YW VI I••/x.. • • l.wn w. u u wnMl Y V xrr Y W.wr YIY.r rl YI v.w Y•1 Y Y V.wn nllr.l I w a.wnl_w.. \III YrWI Iw. =W1•Y Y TW rnrlwwr\rn. rlw_ •Yr w w —r w elrnir Y� wl Irr1Y\ sr1. • . t.wrr .Ilw~Iir r.W. WII 1 wr 1 1 r+ vw/w w 1 111•V•\I rrly w .r rnr, r ra. r Iw. r• r _�Iw1 r rl � :Iran �•qu W, ••r. r x ••w. nru ..rlvl. r.11 Y ••rlr. r•Imnw =:7.—,, 'r 1 •n•y I...r.r'I 1wwYY. .Y r•r4• _I.. _ —w r W s Yrr a Yi. •�• tip. Iw• Y. YY. — �_I Iw1111 W1 . • —W •1� w—W 11111._11 M tr, ••W W w uI. IW. nl1 W[Y Y IYr, Y_IYu ' M Ir _I 1=tWIn 111. \ • .Y, 1111. .1 lr Wu11wY Ir1/Fw 11n Y11�•. Yn IYI Y w•!•VI Y — •1 569 • Y/I•Wwlr lr� ..11•.�wi Wr•1... WY• •r11Y1 r1•• r \ ;^ 1 I IYrN YI YI w. 1 • r1aY w rw1 1 YUVx 4V•h • W1I=YI.r; 11w w Ynww .1 •.rYlwl W • W r. M t --- S69.36'24•E 37700 LOT. •.�L iPs9.] ICr I. i. M�Y1 rlllr _.• _n Yw •• —WT Y� \Y w YI• •1.1 n 11•wrl\I YI N •� r�'e%-, h.T .Irl. '•�^=• w a.wnl_w.. \III YrWI Iw. =W1•Y Y TW rnrlwwr\rn. rlw_ •Yr w w —r w elrnir Y� wl Irr1Y\ sr1. • . t.wrr .Ilw~Iir r.W. WII 1 wr 1 1 r+ vw/w w 1 111•V•\I rrly w .r rnr, r ra. r Iw. r• r _�Iw1 r rl � :Iran �•qu W, ••r. r x ••w. nru ..rlvl. r.11 Y ••rlr. r•Imnw =:7.—,, 'r 1 •n•y I...r.r'I 1wwYY. .Y r•r4• _I.. _ —w r W s Yrr a Yi. •�• tip. Iw• Y. YY. — �_I Iw1111 W1 . • —W •1� w—W 11111._11 M tr, ••W W w uI. IW. nl1 W[Y Y IYr, Y_IYu ' M Ir _I 1=tWIn 111. \ • .Y, 1111. .1 lr Wu11wY Ir1/Fw 11n Y11�•. Yn IYI Y w•!•VI Y — •1 569 • Y/I•Wwlr lr� ..11•.�wi Wr•1... WY• •r11Y1 r1•• r \ ;^ 1 I IYrN YI YI w. 1 • r1aY w rw1 1 YUVx 4V•h • W1I=YI.r; 11w w Ynww .1 •.rYlwl W • W r. M t rY �I r1 r1 w,Yw 11+ n..r W wM— LOT. w a.wnl_w.. \III YrWI Iw. =W1•Y Y TW rnrlwwr\rn. rlw_ •Yr w w —r w elrnir Y� wl Irr1Y\ sr1. • . t.wrr .Ilw~Iir r.W. WII 1 wr 1 1 r+ vw/w w 1 111•V•\I rrly w .r rnr, r ra. r Iw. r• r _�Iw1 r rl � :Iran �•qu W, ••r. r x ••w. nru ..rlvl. r.11 Y ••rlr. r•Imnw =:7.—,, 'r 1 •n•y I...r.r'I 1wwYY. .Y r•r4• _I.. _ —w r W s Yrr a Yi. •�• tip. Iw• Y. YY. — �_I Iw1111 W1 . • —W •1� w—W 11111._11 M tr, ••W W w uI. IW. nl1 W[Y Y IYr, Y_IYu ' M Ir _I 1=tWIn 111. \ • .Y, 1111. .1 lr Wu11wY Ir1/Fw 11n Y11�•. Yn IYI Y w•!•VI Y — •1 • Y/I•Wwlr lr� ..11•.�wi Wr•1... WY• •r11Y1 r1•• r \ ;^ 1 I IYrN YI YI w. 1 • r1aY w rw1 1 YUVx 4V•h • W1I=YI.r; 11w w Ynww .1 •.rYlwl W • W r. M t rY �I r1 r1 w,Yw 11+ n..r W wM— LOT. •.�L iPs9.] ICr I. i. M�Y1 rlllr _.• _n Yw •• —WT Y� \Y w YI• •1.1 n 11•wrl\I YI r .�` LOT. 37'W 61076 --"� t Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten APPROVE RESOLUTION - MWCC SEWER G. Approve Resolution Requesting Connection Permit to MWCC Sewer (Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition) --In order to obtain the most cost effective sanitary sewer service for the proposed future Compri Hotel within this subdivision, it is necessary to connect to the existing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) north interceptor line adjacent to the northeast property line of this addition. In order to connect to this Metropolitan controlled facility, it is necessary for the City Council to pass a resolution indicating there is no other viable utility available. Although there is a sanitary sewer located within Corporate Center Drive, its depth and capacity cannot handle this proposed development as well as a direct connection to the trunk interceptor line. Enclosed on page is a copy of the resolution for Council approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution authorizing connection to MWCC facilities for the Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk. to execute all related documents. ;SlJ RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN AUTHORIZING CONNECTION TO MWCC FACILITIES EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) owns and operates certain trunk sanitary sewer lines within the City of Eagan; and, WHEREAS, in order to respond to a request to provide sewer service to surrounding development (Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition, Compri Motel) a sewer service connection to a MWCC trunk sanitary sewer is necessary because the City has no sewer line within the immediate vicinity; and, WHEREAS, the MWCC requires a permit for such connection along with the City of Eagan's authorization; and, WHEREAS, this sanitary sewer service is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City of Eagan authorized the connection of an 8" sanitary sewer service to the MWCC's North Interceptor for the Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition. 2. The connection will be made in accordance with all condi-tions as set forth in the MWCC permit. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: • Its Mayor Attest: Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: September 16, 1986 CERTIFICATION: Its Clerk I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 16th day of September, 1986. VanOverbeke, City Clerk 5% Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven FINAL PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 70 FIFTH ADDITION H. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 70 5th Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the above referenced subdivision located nor h"of Rainbow and east of Burger Ring. Enclosed on pagez.23-'Z is a copy of the proposed final plat which conforms with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on August 19, 1986. All final plat application materials have been submitted, -reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Town Centre 70 5th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. :TOWN CENTRE 70...FIFTH ADDITION N \ I 0 U L ' a a J LOT 1 fI r• I70 • _ _ - YI ' =r rr rllY .• rY �rM1r, YYW. aR• s1• I.•1 11' •. i Ilr •/ xTI 11 IM Il1Y Y\ N•I Y • Y•1• Y 1 MrY} II Yla rlx. 1 yYr mxlr WI w• Irvrrlrr rly Y r rIW Y rYr\I rr,m Y. I•,r i � Yr •= — •'i1i•\ .. r r WI ' J � r YY � � rrr Y 44 T \ I 0 U L ' a a J LOT 1 I70 BLOCK 11' •. i • ry. Ir r�rl r\. r w.. ,n • rr,.• YY rte\ 1•rl. � r1I� ��:a• � IIL'.� .e• Ir 1 i . m Y'L V•1 i Lt :4 V•rIr•r `-.� NfYlrr W yd4 M.n• r•.II YYYY r Yxlx YrrN rr 1,•, NIY 1.1 Ir, 1. NIY W r�Yr IN IIY,. r NIy 11.1 Irl U n•U YYlryNr\ IIY. Y1r 1WIYY IYIYy Y W IIN. LAX:II '. COUNTY RGLD PIG 2R TAN P:EE DOODLE HUAD R/W W N OUTLOT to aI PLAT _ / LOT 1,7 BLOCK 1, LOT 1, TOWN BLOCK I; I CENTRE o TOWN 0 T Al!fENTRE,t i 70 70 A FOURTH I rHIRD F OU PITIt II ADDITION I ADL'ITION I J ,;c.N ftk`: I t1H19E � r� .._._...... r P. 17 ::E'h.TFtEX Rc / —'—' EXHIBIT "A" I�• r uriai..i W�rY.n.r'r� u ra, •\ w.rI. xr... w•uu N Yrr14. r 4 L` :• ,M1 . WrYr L IY� Y.rY M1 1plp .Y•r1Y• .vYr Y W IrIY• .Ya lyw• � •- r ..rr \Y •r 1• x". . r w w •Ylr Y 1,A [LTr M1 xlrn rxli y yyHY Ir r • fl' •Y.rY• Y •.N. r IIr YYy r MIIIIT wI/r.• wr. • IS 1. r•r. rlyl YI. r•Yul Yr p.Y.T. VYY•a• rrrl YIWIYIrr W .y Yr 1 Y Y YNY •r NIr .. YIY w V YY I. Cur. yI• Y4 � YT Y NrYI/ ,., j tt •: IYw r .1=Y Y TY M1,TIY IrYr\I r• d�`.rr Yy Y •Y'•Tr Y 1\ YYr OINr • Fr1Y1 YI MI. r. rlr,�l'I • YI I�l�.{•r iiN riLrl YY Yr.•rr • YrYY• rr.IY N,W,yI,. ([ -- roll N11• •'I . 1 nm mwlutt YY 1 Yw YI •r nulY W . .q+Y••nr Y m• r u TY. Mt N 111A Tlq. YY YI• rl'+1• I MIYI 'Ylr I W = '. W\ 11 .YYr• W l'• T;'� 1 r .... r u. rlY a Irl w •w•rn: •i:. Ir\. WI Yi Yn w r rl•W Y W a•W II .\r• WI w Y,•1Y Yw•,I IIw .r• YIIY4II y1Wy . W'YIII 'Ij'• W WI WY Y• r r\ 1•W Y I•.11• NY.•Y Y Y Irlrly NYI 1... Y IrY• rWI Y Mrt i aYmTY Y M1 YITIY /rwPIV WUlluu r wrrrYJ Ylp r YL •• 1 1 f 'f. rYH i 1 r.7111�- 1•—r F Jr• ...rlYw. Yrra• .YI.YY1✓R�� 4Q:• rl-TTY a•.— tux r,rll.. :AM.�.I.r.�, r �,�wY.•I lr ,rl r w ' •' 1 '� T '.f�• W.•. 1 • •YIYY Y•• .lir Y• Y �-•- • U', PY LIrI h1iY11 J1• � 1 � Cl" l IL r sYv, ...Ma 1•Irr\ u.••YI Ix. ar. Y yY.YU IITIr aY• .W W .r• I.r••,Y Y4 T .y r.'['S•� '••�� .r 1 CI.TTT. �.T'RT ..T •�. I rrrr r.u4 WI W \r. I•I W rI a ry w IW war r W . � 1 '�.. Ilr <yIY x rinr .OlYli Yw .r rY rel• Y .Ya Y . 1, • 1 yYr mxlr WI w• Irvrrlrr rly Y r rIW Y rYr\I rr,m Y. I•,r i � Yr •= — •'i1i•\ .. r r WI ' J � r YY � � rrr Y .. r,•I ..1 ;t .OEAN Vll D1111Y1YIrq Page 1• of 2 Pages- --• __._L.. 11 I I E Ovo O Ito 40, Al Ili: 9 1 1 1. IT wA 4Z 0 59 Ito 40, Al Ili: 9 1 1 1. IT wA 4Z 0 59 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 473. PILOT KNOB ROAD - TRUNK STORM SEWER A. Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer --On July 15, the initial public hearing was held to discuss the proposed trunk storm sewer improvements necessary for the future upgrading of Pilot Knob Road.._ These improvements were confined primarily to three specific areas: Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park (Hilltop), and Civic Center Site. At that public hearing, there were several concerns and objections raised pertain- ing to the proposed storm sewer outlet for Mooney Lake to McCarthy Lake within Patrick Eagan Park through the wooded backyard areas of several residences. Subsequently, the Council continued the public hearing until September 16 to allow Staff to investigate various alternatives and meet with the affected property owners regarding the proposed alignment. On August 5, the City Administra- tor and consultant engineer met with the affected property owners to discuss the impact of proposed construction and to further discuss feasible alternates. As a result of that meeting, the consultant has investigated and prepared three alternates for discussion and consideration at this continued public hearing. Enclosed on pages ;24 through � is a copy of the original feasibility report for the Council's information and review. En- closed on pagesthrough VL is a copy of an amendment to that report discussing various alternatives to the Mooney Lake outlet. • This amendment was reviewed with the Park Commission at their September 4 meeting. Enclosed on pages s/ through 5/ is a memo from the Director of Parks relating the Park Commission's issues and concerns pertaining to Patrick Eagan Park alternatives. It should be noted that the final plat for the Chatterton Pond Development cannot be approved until this storm sewer alignment issue has been resolved through the public hearing process. The Public Works Director and consultant engineer will discuss the various alternatives in further detail at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve Project 473 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) or any of the alternates. REPORT ON PILOT KNOB ROAD • (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER LMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 473 • EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49380 / n// l3wWdAao, Rase~,, ril a�.P/ da 9 4UOciaz p ,, Jac. SL pa"4 iLl4mm"la 0 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612-636.4600 June 2, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Pilot Knob Road (Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park, City Hall) Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 473 Our -File No. 49380 Otro G. Ban.,., P.E. NuDen W. Nwrnr. Y.H. JwrYh C. Andrdit, Y.E. Bradfard A. Lrmarq, P.E. Rlchuid E. Turnrr, P.E. Junin C. Olean, P.£. Gbnn R. Coot. P.E. Keith A. G.Man, Y.H. Th... E. Nayn, PE. R,,Aurd W. fester, P.E. Raba, G. Schunichq P.E. Marvin L. Sarva/u, P.E. Donald C. Bugard, P.E. Jrr) A. Baurdan, P.E. Murk A. Nmuan, P.E. Ted K. field, P.E. Michael T Nuwmann. P.E. Naar" N. ki/gj Ie. P.E. David O. Lwka,u, P.E. TAamw W. Percrsan, Y.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willa, P.E. Jaron R. Malaria, P.E. Kenneth P. Andrrean; P E. Kuth A. Bachmann, P.E. Mart R. fialfc. PE. Rabe,, C. Nunek, A. LA. Thai.. E. A,.. P.E. Amt L. Yuune. P.E. Churlre A. LY.. Afan Leo M. Parrhly !tartan .N. Oban Swan M. Cardin U Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Pilot Knob Road Trunk Storm Sewer Im- provements, Project No. 473. This report coveres trunk storm sewer and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONES.TR00 RO ENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly RegisteredProfessional Engineer under the laws of t'e.S too Minnesota. �� fij'vJv Mark A. Hanson Date: June 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 i Approved by � � ,� X epartment of Public Works Date: 4, - 9`46, 5456d ate/ 30 Year Anniversary SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer im- provements which .are required at this time due to the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Cliff Road in 1987. The trunk storm sewer im- provements are located in 3 different areas along Pilot Knob Road and are in- cluded within or adjacent to Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park and City Hall. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and only slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. .The revision .proposes that the NWL for Pond BP -15 southwest of Evergreen Park be lowered 6.4 ft. to 892.6 as compared to 899.0 as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This revision to the Master ,Plan is recommended for two reasons: 1. The low point of Sequoia Lane in Evergreen Park Addition can then be drained southwesterly into Pond BP -1'5 thus providing additional capacity within the existing 27" RCP located east of Pilot Knob Road through which this area presently drains. Based on design standards utilized today the existing 27" RCP is approximately 30% under design capacity for a 5 year storm based on its present drainage area. Therefore, redirecting the low point of Sequoia 0 Lane to Pond BP -15 will provide additional capacity for the future storm sewer required in Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the con- struction of this line will provide better street drainage at the intersections of SequoiaLane and Walfrid Street and Sequoia Lane and Lodgepole Drive where additional catch basins are proposed. I Also redirecting this drainage area to Pond BP -15 will allow it to flow by gravity to the Minnesota River rather than through the Carlson Lake lift station where it would have to be pumped to Thomas Lake resulting in additional long term energy costs. Page 1. 5456d Lg 2. The existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive presently discharges into Pond BP -16. However, the controlled elevation of Pond BP -16 is approximately 3' higher than the existing .storm sewer in Lodge - pole Drive. Therefore, by constructing the outlet for Pond BP -15 at a lower elevation and through the existing storm sewer from Lodgepole Drive, this storm sewer can ultimately be drained dry, resulting in less maintenance in.the future. In addition, the de- sired normal water elevation of Pond BP -16 can be preserved as previously intended. It is recommended the project proposed herein be constructed as part of one contract. DISCUSSION: The project for discussion purposes is separated into 3 different areas. Evergreen Park: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing storm sewer within Evergreen Park Addition from the low point in Sequoia Drive southerly along Sequoia Drive and then westerly along Lodgepole Drive to Pond BP -15. It is also proposed to provide additional catch basins in the intersections of Sequoia Drive within Walfrid Street and Lodgepole Drive as shown on the at- s tached drawing. In addition, it is proposed to construct a 12" diameter grav- ity storm sewer outlet from Pond BP -15 to an existing 21" RCP, which serves as the outlet for Pond BP -16 and conveys runoff from the Thomas Lake Elementary School site. The connection to the existing 21" RCP storm sewer will be at a location to provide sufficient grade and capacity to serve as the outlet for Pond BP -15. The 12" diameter storm sewer will also connect to the existing 27" RCP from Lodgepole Drive which presently discharges into Pond BP -16. This connection will allow ,the existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive to drain dry Page 2. 5456d y� and also preserve the existing water elevation of Pond BP -16. Design consid- eration for Pond BP -15 are.as follows: Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro- Comp. Proposal Comp. Proposed Plan posed Plan posed Plan Storage Plan Out -Outflow NWL NWL NWL HWL Storage (Ac.Ft.) flow cfs (cfs) Berry Patch Pond BP -15 899.0 892.6 901.6 894.7 3.0 2.4 1.0 0.5 Berry Patch Park: Storm -sewer proposed for Berry Patch Park provides for con- structing a 12" diameter gravity storm sewer outlet from Mooney Lake (Pond JP -7) to Pond. JP -8 and Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9. Both Pond JP -8 and. Pond JP -9 are included within Patrick Eagan Park. Pond JP -7 is abutted by residential homes to the south and east included in Hilltop Estates while to the north and ® west it is abutted by large unplatted parcels. However, the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 which also abut Pilot Knob Road are presently proposed to be developed. Therefore, as part of their development plans, they will also be required to interconnect Pond JP -36 .to Pond JP -35 and Pond JP -35 to Pond JP -7. Pond JP -36 which abuts Pilot Knob Road will receive additional runoff as part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive. The lateral storm sewer proposed in Pilot Knob Road will be extended northerly and south- erly from Pond JP -36 and ultimately discharge to Pond JP -36. Therefore, due ito the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the proposed development of the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 and the current high water elevation flooding park property and trailways, it is necessary to provide an outlet for Pond JP -7 at this time. Design considerations for Pond JP -7 are as follows: Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Existing b Proposed b Proposed 6 Proposed Proposed Elevation NWL HWL Storage Outflow Pond JP -7 862.8 859.4 865.2 47.6 ac.ft. 1.0 City Hall: Storm sewer proposed at Eagan City Hall includes constructing a storm sewer from the northwesterly corner of Pond JP -6 within an existing open Page 3. 5456d ditch towards City Hall as shown on the attached drawing. Presently, runoff from Pilot Knob Road and a portion of the parking lot at City Hall is conveyed through this open ditch to Pond JP—G. However, those portions of the ditch which are at a steep grade are beginning to suffer severe erosion. Therefore, due to the additional runoff being directed towards this ditch resulting from the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary to construct storm sewer in those portions of the ditch which are susceptible to erosion. However, be— cause of the uncertainty of how the property south of City Hall will develop, it is proposed to preserve the open ditch where it is constructed at flatter grade and erosion is less a concern. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for construction of the storm sewer for Hilltop Park and Evergreen Park. Storm sewer for City Hall is constructed on property owned by the City. Therefore., no easements are required. Page 4. 5456d 9/ r1 • Parcel Permanent Temporary Description Easement Easement EVERGREEN PARK Thomas Lake School Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.18 acre 0.37 acre Thomas Lake Lot 7, Block l 0.06 acre 0.13 acre Lot 8, Block 1 0.07 acre 0.13 acre BERRY PATCH PARK Hilltop Estates Lot 1, Block 1 0.04 acre 0.16 acre Lot 2,, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre Lot 3, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 0.06 acre 0.22 acre Parcel 016-54 0.05 acre 0.18 acre Page 4. 5456d 9/ r1 • r , U AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 22 NW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 012-26 City of Eagan Parcel 010-51 Parcel 013-26 City of Eagan Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan Parcel 010-53 HILLTOP ESTATES Parcel 012-54 Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 1 Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 012-85 City of Eagan Parcel 010-82 City of Eagan SE 1/4,. SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 SE 1/4 S SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 5456d Page 5. 3v- NE 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan THOMAS LAKE SCHOOL ADDITION Lot 1; Block 1 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDN. Lot 7, 8, Block 1 EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 & 28, Blk. 1 Lots 3, 4 S 5, Block 4 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 6 22, Blk. 5 Lots 1 (012), 2, 7, 8 6 9, Block 6 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is listed below: Evergreen Park $162,020 Hilltop Park 68,250 City Hall 39,810 $270,080 The total estimated project cost is $270,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited • property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess- ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef- fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the.final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as- sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. 5456d Page 6. J3 TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWS Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Large Lot $0.50/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft, of ea. ac.) Regional Park $0.02'5/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project areas follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance • Trunk Storm Sewer $270,080 Trunk Area Assessments $214,402 TOTAL $270,080 $214,402 —$55,678 It is anticipated —$55,678 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund. It should be noted, however, that $92,355 of revenue is related to the proposed assessment to Patrick Eagan Park and Berry Patch Park which is con— sidered the City of Eagan. PROJECT SCHEDULE ® Present Feasibility Report June 17, 1986 Public Hearing July 15, 1986 Acquire Easements Summer, 1986 Approve Plans and Specifications August, 1986 Receive Bids Sept., 1986 Award Contract Sept., 1986 Construction Completion Spring, 1986 Assessment Hearing Summer, 1987 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1988 Page 7. 54564 3�- APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.. 473 A. EVERGREEN PARK 600 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. $ 21,600 250 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 8,000 250 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,000 1,380 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 33,120 • 11 Each Std, MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 12,100 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 4,800 1 Each 27" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 600 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 2 Each Connect RCP to existing RCP @$ $600.00/each 1,200 30 Lin.ft. Water main relocation @ $20.00/lin.ft. 600 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 15,000 base • 550 Ton Class 5 aggregate @ $5.00/ton 2,750 60 Lin.ft. Concrete curb and gutter @ $12.00/lin.ft. 720 6,000 Sq.yds. Boulevard sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 9,000 0.5 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 400 5456d Total $118,690 +5% Contingencies 5,940 $124,630 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 37,390 TOTAL EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION ..................... $162,020 Page 8. 36 • r 1 U B. BERRY PATCH PARK (Pond JP -7 to Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9) 1,350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 37,800 2 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/lin.ft. Lin.ft. 2,200 4 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/cstg. @ $500.00/each 3,900 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. Storm sewer in pl. 4,000 16 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. Std. 1,600 3.0 Acres Seeding @ $800.00/acre Each 2,400 RCP Flared end w/trash Total $ 50,000 Each 21" +5% Contingencies Flared end w/trash 2,500 700 8 Cu.yds. $ 52,500 rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest Sq.yds. 15,750 @ $1.50/sq.yd. TOTAL HILLTOP PARK ................................ $ 68,250 C. CITY HALL 150 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 4,200 150 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 3,900 540 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 12,960 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 3,300 1 Each 24" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 1 Each 21" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $700.00/each 700 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 600 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 900 2.0 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 1,600 Total $ 29,160 +5% Contingencies 1,460 $ 30,620 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 9,190 .... TOTAL CITY HALL ................................... $ 39,810 Page 9. 5456d 3(0 Parcel Description SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 010-51 Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-53 Parcel 012-54 Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-00 (Berry Patch Park) SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, HILLTOP PARK, CITY HALL) .TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 473 Area. Credit Assessable $0.05/s.f. Total (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment 66,000 0.05/s.f. 206,910 183,990 Large Lot 75,750 $0.05/s.f. $ 3,788 42,790 Large Lot 16,500 0.05/s.f. 825 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 163,360 Large Lot 49,500 0.05/s.f. 2,475 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 161,500 Pond (152,750) 8,750 0.05/s.f. 438 621,335 Pond ( 40,100) 581,235 0.05/s.f. 29,062 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 110,100 --- 110,100 0.05/s.f. 5,505 202,620 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 336,000 Pond (236,000) 100,000 0.05/s.f. 5,000 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 $0.05/s.f. 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 0.05/s.f. 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 449,380 Future R/W (202) 359,500 0.05/s.f. TOTAL........................................ SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,340 3,494,200 Regional Park Page 10. 5456d 37 $0.025 $ 16,552 16,552 3,300 3,300 17,975 $122,047 $ 87,355 E • ,* PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARCEL NO. SE 174, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 010-79 Parcel 010-81 Parcel 010-82 Parcel 010-83 Parcel 012-85 5456d Page 11. 3e NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012-04 POND BP -17 NWL•897.1 HWL• 6� 892.0 /A i 2 2 1 2 23 8 1 24 1 7ID 1 25 1 N 26 - 1 : N 27 j 1 28 POND BP -16 NWL•898.9 H WL• 901.1 N 0 100' 200' _.o_. ... L_ M _ET '010-00 (PARK) POND BP -15 NWL• 892.6 HWL•894.7 ti 7' 7 Z 012 2 v 6 D: 011 3 O 10 4 5 U PROPOSED STORM SEWER POND SP -14 Q NWL• 699.0 O S HWL•901.1 0: ii PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA I F-11 M:: S vzll� FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) WILDERNESS BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1886 FIG. No. I Comm. 49380 MM ti 7' 7 Z 012 2 v 6 D: 011 3 O 10 4 5 U PROPOSED STORM SEWER POND SP -14 Q NWL• 699.0 O S HWL•901.1 0: ii PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA I F-11 M:: S vzll� FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) WILDERNESS BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1886 FIG. No. I Comm. 49380 m PATRICK EAGAN PARK — it CITY m MAN Pi (Co. Rd. No. 3 1) LEXINGTON A��� � LEXINGTON WAYI (Co. Rd. N6. 43) 1 1 1 1 1 BERRY PATCH NRR MRK 010-w* ST. JOHN NEUMAN ADOITION lff� j ANN. mill PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA //-2 BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers - St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE. 108 FIG. NO. 4 COMM. 48380 11 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. On. G. &mn, uo. P.E. Ckn. R. C. .P.E.. N.br, W. Nwrnr, /l L'. A'rirh A. Gr6doh. P.E. 0 Jm AA C. Am Ffhk, P.L. 7Amnw E. Nop, PE. HWAdA. LrmhrrA. P.E. NAdurd W. f.w. P.E'. NirhuM E. T.,.. Y.E. Nobn G. k' hrnnh,, P.E. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects J.m., C. Uhun. P.E. Marvin L. Swwb. P.E. St. Paul, MN 55113 Uun.ld c ur,lrrd,. P.E. Jr..Y A. Ruwdw,, P.E. 612.636.4600 MIA ll.n;.n. P.E. Td Al FVM, P.E. Hhh.rl T Nuuununn. VL N.hrn N, PpyMr. AF.': LWvid U. Lwlum, It E, ALTERNATE REPORT rArmw x'. w,rnrn. Pe. MirhwlC LYnrh, I'.!'. PILOT KNOB ROAD Awr. L. MY.. P.E. (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) Jumn N. M.l.ml, AE. A'rnnnh P. Andenwr. Y.E. TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Ar„h A. Rmh.nunn, r.l: PROJECT NO. 473 Mur* R. Nul/, P.E. M.&,, C. R.O. A.I.A. FILE NO, 49380 Th..., E. An,w. /•.E. &." L. YrrnF AL. Churn A. &, A9 ., September 2, 1986 Lru M. Purrhl, /ludun M. Glwn ' Suun At. Ebdln DISCUSSION: • Berry Patch Park - As part of the public hearing held on July 15, 1986, resi- dents abutting the proposed alignment for the Mooney Lake outlet expressed their concern relative to the impact of construction adjacent to their proper- ties. As a result, the public hearing was continued and a neighborhood meet- ing was scheduled and held on August 5, 1986. The proposed project was dis- cussed in greater detail and other alternates were discussed in addition to other alternates which were suggested and required additional study. Since the neighborhood meeting, three alternates have been studied in more detail. Alternate I provides for constructing a gravity storm sewer outlet to the east constructed within park property and Berry Ridge Road as shown on the attached drawing. The gravity line within Berry Ridge Road will be 20' to 24' deep for approximately 400'. Although this construction is included entirely within street right-of-way which no easements are anticipated, the depth of cut requires restoration of the entire street surface and southerly boule- vard. The estimated project cost for Alternate I is $109,120 as detailed in Appendix A. Page 1. 7520d Alternate II provides for construction of a lift station and force main constructed in the approximate alignment as Alternate I. The advantage to Al- ternate II is that the cuts in Berry Ridge Road are 5'-7' deep as opposed to 20'-24' deep resulting in less restoration of boulevard and street surface. The estimated project cost for Alternate II is $84,480. The disadvantage to Alternate II is the ongoing operation and maintenance cost for a lift sta- tion. The estimated energy cost for this ..lift station based on it's size and pumping head is $350/year. Additional costs which would be incurred would be routine maintenance and replacement. The third alternative provides for a lift station and force main construc- ted within and through Chatterton Ponds to Pond JP -36 as 'shown on the attached drawing. Also included is a gravity line from Pond JP -36 to Pond JP -37 and to the existing trunk storm sewer located approximately 1/4 mile to the east. The cost of Alternate III is $136,990 which does not include costs associated with easement acquisition that would be incurred. In addition, from an engi- neering standpoint, it was never intended the storm water from this drainage area drain to the west, therefore, the existing storm sewer which it would discharge does not have the required capacity to convey this flow. As a re- • cult, Alternate III is not recommended for consideration. Costs associated with Alternate I, II, III and the amount presented in the original preliminary report are presented below: Alternate I ('Gravity, Berry Ridge Road) Alternate II (Lift Station 6 Force Main, Berry Ridge Rd.) Alternate III (Lift Station 6 Force Main, to West) Preliminary Report (Gravity through Backyards) Page 2. 7520d $109,120 84,480 136,990 68,250 In summary, the alignment proposed in the preliminary report is less cost- ly, however, this cost does not assume any costs associated with easement ac- quisition. Based on comments from the affected residents, it is apparent costs would be incurred for easement acquisition in the event the alignment proposed in the preliminary report was approved. It is anticipated these costs could range between $10,000 and $25,000. Alternate I and II do not re- quire easements, however, they are more costly and will require either a deep gravity sewer or a lift station and force main constructed within Berry Ridge Road. ASSESSMENTS AND REVENUE: Assessment and revenue costs as presented in the preliminary report remain the same. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of Jthe Eta of innesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: September 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Page 3.. 7520d APPENDIX A ALTERNATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD (BERRY PATCH PARK) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 473 A.) ALTERNATE I (GRAVITY, BERRY RIDGE ROAD) 600 Lin.ft. 12" RCP, 0'-15' dp. @ $24.00/lin.ft. $ 14,400 470 Lin.ft. 12" RCP, 15'-25' dp. @ $42.00/lin.ft. 19,740 3 Each Std. MH @ $900.00/each 2,700 25 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' deep @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,500 2 Each 12" RCP FE @ $400.00/each 800 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 480 LUMP SUM Clear 6 grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 1,070 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,070 1,500 Sq.yds. Remove Bituminous Pavement @$2.00/sq.yd. 3,000 490 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb @ $2.00/lin.ft. 980 240 Lin.ft. Remove ex. storm sewer pipe @ $5.00/lin.ft. 1,200 2 Each Reconstruct ex. CB @ $500.00/each 1,000 80 Lin.ft. Reconstruct ex. sanitary sewer @ $12.00/lin.ft. 960 80 Lin.ft. Reconstruct ex. water main @ $15.00/lin.ft. 1,200 30 Lin.ft. Reconstruct ex. storm sewer pipe @ $12.00/lin.ft. 36 600 Ton Class 5 Aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 4,80 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous Mixture for Patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 15,000 490 Lin.ft. Concrete curb b gutter @ $10'.00/lin.ft. 4,900 1,100 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 1,650 1.2 Acres Seed @ $1,000.00/Ac. 1,200 Total $ 79,940 +5% Contingencies 4,000 $ 83,940 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin., Bond Interest 25,180 TOTALALTERNATE I ................................... $109,120 Page 4. 7520d B.) ALTERNATE II (LIFT STATION b FORCE MAIN BERRY PATCH ROAD 880 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Force main @ $15.00/lin.ft. $ 13,200 130 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Inlet @ $30.00/lin.ft. 3,900 LUMP'SUM Submersible lift station @ $35,000.00/L.S. 35,000 1 Each 8" G.V. S Box @ $600.00/each 600 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 4 Each Driveway restoration @ $600.00/each 2,400 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 480 1,000 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 1,500 13010 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,010 1.0 Acre Seed @ $800.0.0/acre 800 Total $ 61,890 +5% Contingencies 3,100 $ 54,990 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin., Bond Interest 19.490 7520d TOTAL ALTERNATE II .. $ 84,480 Page 5. T 7 010-82 011-85 011-86 016-54 PRELIMINARY REI ALIGNMENT 016-64 014-64 040-61 IF- - 010-83 ND .8 WL - 8192 PATRICK EAGAN PARK HWL-8 0 200' 012-85 \ \ ALTERNATERG-I T STATION & FORCE MAIN) \ ALTERNATEI(GRAVITY SEWER) \\ Ex. STORM SEWER \V 1 1E2 RY NEO 5 2 1 3 . 2 0 4 3 f-- �� 1 6 RRY PATCH P 2 010-00 3 7(MOONEY LAKE) O 4 0\ / POND JP -7 NWL-85QA 5 O P060-51 HWL - 8652 f PLOT KNOB ROAD BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Engineers & Architects ALTERNATEI&Ir ALIGNMENTS l St. Paul, Minnesota PROJECT No. 473 Date: SEPT 1988 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ! Comm. 49380 Fig. No. I Ex. 27" RCP i PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ALTERNATE X ALIGNMENT PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA f� SONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:SEPT., 1988 Comm. 48380 [Fig. N o. 2 otn., r1U n lmnm 060-51 (MOONEY LAKE) 7® POND JP -7 . NWL=859.4 010- I 8 10 II 050-51 HWL-865.2 „ 00 PROPSO ED 8�R4WB I CgNeRY 2 27 26 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED LIFT STATION Existing 28 Storm 3 020-51 Sewer CTO 29 20 4� /;' 26 ESTATES' / 27 5 © 31 19 / 6 PROPOSED 28 —� 32 6" D.I.P. 7 014-50 FORCE MAIN 15- 8 HILLTOP 16 14 2a> OF POND JP -35 13 9 EAGAN NWL=669.4 17 12 10 O • ST. JOHN NEUMANN // 11 18 \ 10 THE �P 2 /) 9 p I / 8 1 K / LJ LJ 7 2 _ POND JP -36 PINES 012-54 NWL=870.6 6 3 I 5 4 W m PILOT K OB ROAD PROPOSED 12" RCP � II 12 ® 7 KNOB N/LL ®� 10 PROPESSION4L 9 8 PARK 0 300, ® SCALE IN FEET 010-75 OUTLO T D Ex. 27" RCP i PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ALTERNATE X ALIGNMENT PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA f� SONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:SEPT., 1988 Comm. 48380 [Fig. N o. 2 0 TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 RE: PROJECT 473 - ADVISORY PARKS do RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Project 473, and in particular, the alternative report dated September 2nd, 1986, from Mark Hansen at a September 4th Commission meeting. The Commission put in an inordinate amount of time discussing this project and the potential impact on Patrick Eagan Park, along with a number of other • issues. These included:.. water quality, construction disruption, water elevations for J.P. - 8, cost estimates, and of course, desirability, and feasiblity, for surface drainage - at the point at which gravity would cause the water to run to J.P. - 8. In regards to the concept of creating a stream, or brook type amenity to the park, there appeared to be three separate schools_of thought regarding this. (A) We don't need it, and if we do - is this the ideal location?. We can create a stream by way of a re -circulation pump. (B) The concept is unique, but not enough information, or the cost to create a brook is presented. (C) It is a good opportunity to use a resource of water, rather than pipe it underground to the river, let's make use of it. • Generally, the Commission agreed with the report that Alternate 03, force main and gravity to the west, was not cost effective. Alternate #1, the gravity feed through Berry Ridge Road, was also rejected by the Commission. Alternate 02, which is a lift station and force main and the original alternative proposed in the preliminary report, seemed most logical to the majority of the Commission members. There remained several questions unanswered, which the Commission desired more information on. 1. What share in the cost will the County pay in the entire project cost? Due to the the upgrading of the Pilot Knob Road and increased run-off, will the County be responsible for paying a portion of the cost of the storm sewer system? 2. Can the output of the pump for the force main be controlled or throttled back in any way that would insure a longer period of pumping, in order to create a stream, through the park for longer periods of time than the forty- four (44) days now estimated? Would there be any impact of the flooding of Mooney Lake over it's established NOHW, if this were to happen? 3. What is the impact on JP - 8, and a controlled elevation for this pond? 4. What are the alternative costs for surface drainage, i.e., rip -rap, etc. Once water gets to Patrick Eagan Park, could gravity and surface drainage be used? 5. Could the pipe be laid on the surface, rather than at a shallow depth of 3 to 4 feet, once the force main reaches the park? SUMMATION The Advisory Commission was in agreement that the project should move forward with detailed planning. The Commission wished to have further input and review as detailed planning continues, as it relates to impact upon the parks. Additional information relative to impact on Patrick Eagan Park, and review of possible alternatives, i.e., surface drainage and surface piping, were mentioned as issues the Commission wished to look at. Thank you to your attention to these matters. I would be happy to discuss • them with you further and provide you with additional background. i KV/bls cc: Mark Hansen, Bonestroo, Rosen, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. Tom Hedges, City Administrator ,.__� JA-*'/ Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen PROJECT 428, KENNEBEC DRIVE - STREETS AND UTILITIES B. Final 'Assessment Hearing for Project .428, Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities --Project 428 provided for the installation of streets and utilities along Kennebec Drive, connecting Blackhawk Road with the Seneca Road/Comanche Drive intersection, in addition to trunk storm sewer improvements. The final assessment hearing for the trunk storm sewer improvements was previously held on March 4, 1986, with the remaining streets and utilities for Kennebec Drive being discussed on September 16. Enclosed on page is a summary of the final assessment roll, ®, showing the relationship of the final assessments to the estimates contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 19, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 428 (Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the certification to the County for collection. 5��_ FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 428 SUBDIVISION/AREAS Cedar Industrial Park — Kennebec Drive FINAL ASSESSHEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. a Feasibility Report . FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area _ Laterals Service n Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM Area 0 Laterals $9.94.FF $17.89/FF FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area Laterals Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS d Gravel Base DX Surfacing Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 5 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $139,939.71 (FR ;171.100) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-5 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 19, 1985 53 $59.27/FF $68.00/FF • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 429, TOWN CENTRE 70 & 100 ADDITIONS - STREETS AND UTILITIES C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 429 (Town Centre 70 and 100 Additions - Streets and Utilities) --This project provided for the installation of streets and utilities under City Contracts 85-8 and 85-9, servicing the Town Centre 70, 100, Forest Ridge, and Eagan Convience Center Additions, as well as several unplatted parcels along Duckwood Drive. This is the largest special assessment roll the City has prepared to date. Subsequently, it is a very complex and detailed report. It has been reviewed in detail with the major developer, Federal Land Company. Enclosed on page $� is a summary of the final assessement rates compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on April 16, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these proposed assessments - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 429 (Town Centre 70 and 100 - Streets and Utilities) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. O 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 429 SUBDIVISION/AREA: TOWN CENTRE 70 & 100 FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. �z Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area T.C. 70 $20.39/F.F. $7574%i]F • LateralsT.C. 100 $19.21/F.F. $28.08/F..F.I Service E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM ®Comm/Ind: $0.072/S.F. $0.072/S.F. Area Residential:$0.061/S.F. $0.061/S.F. Laterals SANITARY E] Area T.C. 70 CD Laterals T.C. 100 Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $ 4.06—FF —F $1T. TFBF, $1129/F.F. $16.90/F.F. STREETS Duckwood: $2.72 �X Gravel Base Denmark: $19.21 T.C. 70 :$39..96 O Surfacing T.C. 100:$53.18 MSAS: $60.15 E] Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 37 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 9% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $2,611,036.31 (F.R. = $3,666,734) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-8, 85-9 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 16, 1985 ,5A $1.33 $7.49' $81.42 8 .O1 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 417, Birchpark Addition - (Streets & Utilities) --Project 417 provided for the installation of streets and utilities servicing the Birchpark Addition and property on the south side of Deerwood Drive under two contracts: 85-9 (Denmark Avenue and Deerwood Drive. surfacing) and 85-10 (internal streets and utilities). Enclosed on page �$is a summary of the final assessment rates and a comparison t45 --the estimated rates contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing • held on September 18, 1984. As a result of that initial public hearing, several property owners along the south side of Deerwood Drive submitted objections and pursued a reduction request through the Special Assessment Committee which was ultimately reviewed by the Council on September 17, 1985. Those final maximum assessment amounts based on benefit received as verified by formal appraisals have been included in this final assessment roll. Although there was an error in the amount identified in the notice of this public hearing, it has been corrected by a subsequent notice to those affected property owners. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and seat to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and to approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 417 (Birchpark Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. 54 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 417 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Birch Park Addition' , FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. FINAL NATER RATES - RATES SANITARY RATES Birch Park: $433,12/Lot $467/Lot Area Section 22:$1120/Acre $1720/Acre ❑ Area X Laterals 11' F.R. RATES $ .87/F.F. $16.47/F.F. J Laterals $14.72/F.F. $17.04/F.F. Service (1) $838.58/Lor $.1064/1.ot ❑ Service 0 Lat. Benefit/Trunk $10.84 /F.F. $10.84/F.F. ❑ Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM Area ® Laterals $12.91/F.F. 513.85/F.F, STREETS ❑ Cravel Base Birch Park: $31.99/F.F. $31.35/F.F. © Surf acinp,Deerwood $30.49/F.F. $,30.49/F.F. Lots: ❑ Res. Equiv. Includes both sanitary sewer and water services. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 80 NUMBER.OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 RATE OF INTEREST: 99 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $589;047.08 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-9, 85-10 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 18, 1984 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen iJ kf:VW<TXIf-*W:ik`Ywl-iDKV1CCel-iON*- B. Final Assessment Hearing, Projject 419 (Slaters Acres) -- Project 419 provided for the i'nsta'llation of streets and utilities to service the Slaters Acres, Northern Oaks and unplatted parcels to the south. As indicated at the time of presenting final assessment roll*for the Council's consideration • of scheduling this final_ assessment hearing, cost overruns beyond the feasibility report estimates were identified resulting from unexpected cost increases for easement acquisition and change orders during construction. A detailed analysis of these cost overruns will be provided as part of the administrative packet prior to the hearing on September 16. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has received a written objection from Hilla Construction Company pertaining to a portion of the assessments for sanitary sewer lateral resulting from their request for a change order to lower the elevation to better serve their future developments. The basis of their objections relate to the addition of the City's overhead to actual construction costs for the change order. A meeting has been •scheduled with them for 9:00 a.m. Monday, September 15 to further discuss this issue. A summary of this meeting will also be provided with the administrative packet regarding the overall assessments for this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 419 (Slaters Acres - Streets and Utilities) and authorize certification to the County for collection. *A -copy of -the final assessment roll is enclosed on page. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 419 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Slaters Acres FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area ® $ rl.0 F -.F. r -7771-77T. Laterals $2,206.31/Lot $1,850/Lot $6 78.73-7 o —t Lot XD Service $741.69/Lot $280/Lot Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM XI Area $0.045/S.F. $0.045/S.F. Q Laterals $745.77/Lot $837/Lot FINAL F. SANITARY RATES RA Area $ 3.87 F.F. $3.i.7 MX Laterals $5,371.78/Lot $4,133/ ❑ Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 25 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $342,369.38 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-3 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 18, 1984 $5,787.20/Lot $4_38 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING F. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 423 (Group W Cable Addition - Streetsj--This project provided for the street surfacing and storm sewer improvements to that portion of Old Sibley Highway providing access to the new Group W Cable Addition Headquarters. The project that was finally approved and constructed was an alternate to the original proposal for project 423 providing for full street construction (curb and gutter with bituminous surfacing) to the northerly limits of the -Group W Cable Addition with bituminous surfacing only to the entrance road of the gas company facility. The original report did not provide for the installation of curb and gutter along the south side adjacent to the unplatted property. However, with the processing of the proposed splashland addition dev-elopment, it was appropriate to modify the report with the alternate providing for full construction as finally assessed. Enclosed on page (o/ is a copy of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the last public hearing held on December 17, 1985 for the alternate project. The ten percent over run for the full street surfacing resulted from ,processing change orders necessary to remove poor subsoil conditions that were not known at the time of the feasibility report estimate. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 423 Alternate (Group W Addition - Streets) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. Ly WATER FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 423 - ALT SUBDIVISION/AREA: Group W Addition FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report: No. 423 - Alternate (As Bid) FINAL F.R. FINAL RATES RATES SANITARY RATES F. R. RATES STORM STREETS _Q_ AreaGravel Base Laterals D SurfaciT.H. 13 n&Group W $54.41 F.F.(i�$49.64/F.F. Group W — $32.62/F.F. $36.58/F.F. • Res. Equiv. End %(1) Includes storm sewer and ditch work. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 6 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $115.107.75 (F.R = $110,360) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 - 23 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 20, 1984; July 2, 1985• Decemb r 17 19A5 Area Area Laterals 0 Laterals 0 Service Service El Lat. Benefit/Trunk Lac. Benefit/Trunk F. R. RATES STORM STREETS _Q_ AreaGravel Base Laterals D SurfaciT.H. 13 n&Group W $54.41 F.F.(i�$49.64/F.F. Group W — $32.62/F.F. $36.58/F.F. • Res. Equiv. End %(1) Includes storm sewer and ditch work. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 6 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $115.107.75 (F.R = $110,360) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 - 23 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 20, 1984; July 2, 1985• Decemb r 17 19A5 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING G. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 4'33,(Lexington Square 2nd Addition - Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer) --Project 433 provided for the extension of the trunk sanitary and storm sewer facilities • through the Lexington Square 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page d.� is a summary of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 7, 1985. All notices ,have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 433 (Lexington Square 2nd Addition - Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. 62-- FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 433 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Lexington Square 2nd & 3rd Additions FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R.- WATER RATES RATES Area Laterals 0 Service " E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM ® Area 0.048/sf $0.048/sf Laterals �x Lateral$359.79/ $383/lot Benefit/Trunk lot STREETS - Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. ` NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 324 •lots., 'S parcels NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 years RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $581,075..68 (feasibility report=$'629,.433) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 20 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 7, 1985 L_ �3 FINAL F. R. SANITARY RATES RATES Q Area $1,190/ac $1,190/ Laterals Service Q Lat. Benefit/Trunk $28.69/ $28.6 Cl foot Cl f STREETS - Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. ` NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 324 •lots., 'S parcels NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 years RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $581,075..68 (feasibility report=$'629,.433) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 20 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 7, 1985 L_ �3 • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen VACATION OF PORTION OF RAGAN INDUSTRIAL ROAD H. Vacation of a Portion of Eagan Industrial Road --On August 19, the Council received a petition and scheduled a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of existing public right-of-way for Eagan Industrial Road a -t its intersection with Eagandale Bou evard as identified by the legal description enclosed on page _. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and s_ent to all utility companies potentially affected by this vacation., As of this date, staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation. The developer and land owner of Lot 3, Block 2 Eagandale Center Industrial Park will be performing the reconstruction of the intersection at their costs as a consideration of this vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Eagan Industrial Road at its intersection with Eagandale Boulevard as legally described. 0 PROPOSED ROAD VACATION SKETCH: EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK �AC'A11 L_ry Jr -Ai V MOST EASTERLY -\ CORNER OF LOT 3 L.LI`I Ph O )j �1 L / 1 T 1r '• N L;.S 9P 5nnde Land Surveying 9001 E ftaom gl Froe�y 05W) Sk o ngb . MN SS470 (9/2) Yl -U" 200-86 KL 1 -F -� moo`` i SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3 -13766 60 C?� 'J Fin r)I� T� REVIEWED BY 0 PROPOSED ROAD VACATION DESCRIPTION That part of Eagan Industrial Road as dedicated on EAGANDALE CENTER INDUST- RIAL PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the most easterly corner of Lot 3, Block 2 of said EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK; thence southwesterly along the south- easterly line of said Lot 3 to the southeast corner of said Lot 3, being the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence continuing southwesterly along the southwesterly extension of said southeast line of Lot 3, a distance of 64.07 feet; thence westerly a distance of 37.70 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a radius of 24.00 feet and a central: angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; thence northwesterly, tan- gent to said curve, a distance of 81.80 feet to the south line of said Lot 3; thence easterly, along said south line of Lot 3 a distance of 137.66 feet to the point of beginning. EDENOTES ROAD TO BE VACATED SCALE: 111 -100' Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty PROPOSED 1987 GENERAL FUND BUDGET I. Public Hearing for Proposed 1981 General Operating Budget -- Preparation of a draft 1987 budget was completed, by all departments of the City in early August. During the month of August the City Administrator revised all departmental budgets and presented a balanced budget for review and consideration at a special City Council meeting/budget workshop that was held on August 28. At that meeting all budgets were reviewed. After much deliberation the City Administrator was given guidelines to reduce the budget to avoid a mill levy increase in 1987. Budget revisions were made and a second budget workshop session was held on Monday, September B to review the impact of City Council and City Administration budgetary adjustments. The total budget being considered for 1987 is $7,389,630. The City Administrator will have a budget information packet ready for distribution at the meeting on Tuesday and also overheads for a formal presentation. The presentation will be brief unless there are residents in the audience who would like additional information . and an understanding of the general fund budget. There is no action to be required on this item. The purpose for holding a public hearing to .consider the general fund budget for the next calendar year is to allow public input and discussion on certain programs and services that are offered by their local government. At the October 7 City Council meeting the mill levy certification will be discussed and more than likely acted upon for certification to the County. This action will certify the amount of taxes to be collected in 1987 which is the largest, revenue source for the operating budget. The final expenditures and operating budget will be acted on later this fall after the City Council have reviewed all public enterprise accounts consisting of water, sewer and street lighting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept public input and provide an appropriate direction to the City Administrator regarding further development of the operating budget. Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Ane CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/LIQUOR LICENSE FOR COMPRI HOTEL A. Conditional Use Permit for a Liquor License for the Compri Hotel --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their July 29, 1986 meeting to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow liquor for the Compri Hotel in an R.B. Planned Development. This item was placed on the August 19 City Council agenda, however, at the request of the developer, the item was continued- until the September 16 City Council agenda. The APC is recommending approval of this condi- tional use permit. For a copy of the staff report,, refer to pages through /67 For action.. that was taken by the Advisory Planning Comfnission, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page 7� ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application as submitted. 47 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: PRISM HOTEL MANAGEMENT COMPANY LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1 OF EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK, OUTLOT A OF EAGANDALE OFFICE EXISTING ZONING: RB - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PARK DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 29, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 21, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted request- ing a conditional use permit to allow liquor for the Compri Hotel in an RB-- Planned Development. COMMENTS': At the June 24, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the APC reviewed and approved the preliminary plat and detailed site plan for a Prism hotel. This hotel ,contained 190 rooms and was to be six stories in height. It was noted at the June 24 meeting, that the applicants had made an applica- tion or would be making an application for a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor at this facility. 'At the July 15, 1986 City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved' the preliminary plat of the Compri Hotel and the zoning to the RB type commercial planned development. At this meeting, the City Council had concerns regarding the liquor license portion even though the liquor license was hot - under consideration at that time. It was clearly indicated to the applicants, that with a detached restaurant and hotel, one liquor license would be all that would be allowed for that site, therefore, the applicants are aware of the Council's concern regarding the liquor license criteria. The application submitted is only the portion that requires the public hearing process for a conditional use permit. The roadside business portion would allow on -sale liquor as a permitted use, however, the planned development does not specifically spell out on -sale liquor as a permitted use and this public hearing will clarify that the applicants are proposing on sale liquor for the hotel in this planned development. The liquor -license criteria will be a separate issue that the City Council will deal with, in regard to the number of licenses and .where they will be located. CONDITIONS 1) All City ordinances shall be adhered to. m 0 0 4L tCOMPRI ROTE OPUS CORPORATION SLAJ� r� APC Minutes July 29, 1986 EAGANDALE OFFICE CENTER - PHASE TWO - SITE PLAN REVIEW A site plan review for Eagandale Office Center, Phase Two, located in the northwest quarter of Section 3, in the northeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Avalon Avenue was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Mr. Runkle introduced the application. Mr. David Hunt, project manager for Opus, was present to represent the applicant. No appearances were made on behalf of the public. Discussion centered around the fact that the parking area consisted of 315 parking spaces versus the 380 required under the ordinance. City Planner Runkle advised that the area did provide more than required green space which would be available for additional parking if required. Member Hall indicated that the parking requirement for office buildings in the City of Eagan was high in relation to other cities where in many cases, one space for 200 square feet of net rentable area were required, as opposed to one for 150 square feet of gross area. Hall moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard engineering conditions shall be complied with. 2. All conditions of the Eagan Office Park Planned Development shall be complied with. 3. Staff review of the adequacy of parking prior to phase 4 of the development: -nn All voted yea. PRISM HOTEL MANAGEMENT COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then called the public hearing in regard to Prism Hotel Management Company's request for conditional use permit for a liquor license • for the Compri Hotel located on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, and Outlot A of Eagandale Office Park, in that part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Dale Runkle introduced the application indicating that the request merely was to determine the appropriateness of the conditional use permit for on -sale liquor within the hotel in the City of Eagan. The applicant was represented. There were no comments from the public. Hall moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend that the conditional use permit for on -sale liquor in the hotel within this PUD is appropriate. All voted in favor. FREDERICK DeLOSH - REZONING Chairperson McCrea next called the public hearing for rezoning from R-1 (Single Family) to A (Agricultural) property owned by Mr. Frederick DeLosh of approximately 13.45 acres located in part of the south half of Section 4, west - of Pilot Knob Road and north of Lone Oak Road. City Planner Runkle described the application as one for rezoning from R-1 to Agricultural, to continue the ability to stable horses on the site. Mr. Frederick DeLosh was present and Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two BOW AND ARROW HUNTING SEASON A. Bow and Arrow Hunting Season Clarification --The City Administrator was contacted by John Parker, area wildlife manager for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, who is recom- mending that the City of Eagan permit bow and arrow deer hunting this season. The ordinance was amended on November 9, 1984,. to allow for the use of bow and arrow under certain circumstances. The ordinance reads as follows: "'It is unlawful for any person to shoot a bow and arrow except in the physical education program • in a school supervised by a member of its faculty, a community wide supervised class. or event specifically authorized by the Chief of Police, or a bow and arrow range, or by any person participating in a special bow and arrow hunting season, which season may not conflict with state law or regulations established by the Council for the purpose of wildlife management, or such other place during such time or times as authorized by the Council. This special bow and arrow deer season for the southeast Minnesota and special metro area is September 13 through December 31. All of Eagan is included in a bonus bow hunt which allows a licensed hunter to take a second deer by bow and arrow. The Police Department is prepared to authorize the bow and arrow hunt according to City Ordinance during the time frame as set forth by the DNR. The DNR asks that hunters who wish to participate in the special metro area hunt comply with all local ordinances, including obtaining the local permits as may be required. The Police Department would like to control all bow and arrow hunting to ® unplatted areas of no less than five (5) acres. Under the current ordinancea resident who has the bow and arrow deer license could fall a deer on his property in a platted area. Since the ordinance states that the regulations can be designated to another place during such time or times authorized by the Council at direction to the Police Department to hunt in controlled areas, such as unplatted and no less than five acres would be an acceptable interpretation of the ordinance. For additional information on the request by DNR to have a bow and ,arrow hunt in Eagan, a -copy of the metro archery `bonus deer map �y� 'and an outline of the rules and regulations, refer to pages � through T7f . ACTION TO BE CONSIDER -ED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the 1987 bow and arrow season as set forth by DNR and further discuss and consider regulatory language for direction to the Police Department regarding the type of land area that may be authorized for bow and arrow hunters. I/ IrDEPARTMENT 7 �STATE OF PHONE NO. 445-9393 Area Wildlife Office 223 Holmes Street Shakopee, NN 55379 Tom Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, 10 55122 OF NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Bow and Arrow Deer Hunt for Eagan • Dear 11r. Hedges: FILE September 4, 1986 As we discussed on the telephone today, I would strongly recommend that the City of Began permit Bow. and Arrow Deer Hunting this season. I would also recommend that your shooting regulations be structured to allow as much land as possible to be hunted with a minimum of regulation. You might want to consider lowering the amount of land ownership required from 40 to 10, 20, or 30 acres. I would also recommend that if you must require a city permit that you issue one to each landowner only and allow the landowner to issue subpermits or simply written permission with the master permit number on it. If enforcement is a problem you might consider some sort of back tag with numbers large enough to be read at a distance. I don't think this is necessary, it would be a hindrance to bow hunters, and it should be implemented only as a last resort. The season this year runs from September 13 through December 31. I have enclosed a copy of the season synopsis. Also, this year for the first time a Metro Bonus Archery Deer Zone has been established which includes all of Eagan. This will allow any archer to purchase a second license and take a second (antlerless only) deer within the zone. I have enclosed an information sheet. If I may be of any further help, please let me know. cerel c— on P ker, Area t7ildlife Manager AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1966 Metro Archery r`.. Bonus Deer Area (within Boundary) LINWOOD 1 � � Rn nrxn 9YRN1 I iOLN LROYL I uxvT ANOM CO. COLUreus 1 ,YMV.[ X•Y L[FI I(ERNST LANE 'E. SCA". •OR(g1 L.nC I. 1 I na- • Crow River ..IT DF 'F '• IIXe L•[fl •••Ixt L x. YruG c00x unm IN C[N IF FVIL L[ ue♦ [L(IY( X u40 N.FOv[S uuxcrox Luu(rlus WASHINGTON CO. L•[INnILO Co FCOUN xoLl Gmv[ Ouee 11 NOu.. LxO [[YIn n DeIIw PLEB A CHALIN IL(R YIIY FOIIX 3 511[Lrv.I Ev OC[re•O Poem 13 O•NS M1NIII NEAR HENNEPIN CO. SAOOYLSA xv ` RIGHTS I'( GRANT .{ --. CENTS. bu..... RIGHT[ � A C SILL '.L a1S t M QLO Ffrro OU ANDY. V ]e 02 STI LTu .1. 14 Awl .... IT Nmlx. nrNDmx xOIL to ml ural O N4 n[n.Ix IO![YRLI AFRO• [i. 144E a Y fill Irk cVA oliii LOAD Lle Lr a N.rtn oo0 Ly-lRADELI ii YO Gp a.a^WN e AR • I p /Est 6 V o[oxD GAr AI � I RAMSET CO. �; "K ELAND II aroF xIFF[I [IHRr I NIFFllOF4 Lr. IOYTt e11111T r1YL 1 31 L4F [I A HOLLYWOOD wArf RlpWN 9 FD PARR ®NIMM[VOL4' -As] I1 [[I x.Y[G OIIIGi 1 Lr�J1 4 _ T. [ROIL 9[E N _ — ii✓, ONIIIC. OS TOWN 19 FMOOOSY Rr 4ROG3 4Y1• 1 PAUL rLfRNNxYI II- RICHFIELD EE1101i. [IIL6 XIx FLFI Tlour C1011 CNENNNISfX M(FD1N AU I [ ' C..DEN I 'XACONI. LEXETO I [DIN PARA" N•COxu S.. AUL I 9LOONIIDIOM • CXASNA IF Nf R 410Y[ CARVER CO. uc4F ncxn c9nAN[GIDNE DEAN.., 30 T CHASYA DAKOTA CO. touxl xORY10001� i COLO I DANLGREN A•v[r IAAIIIII � I`SDn S41.G[ 1 eUN.IYILL[ 1 TOUNG.NERIC• I eENrON II ATOS HnLI VALLEY [OL[NOYNr Nu-YGfF x4 ET.G r LOYISYILIE LAST xa rlGc( 1 HANCOCK I SAN FRANCISCO CA rfNN11 L10N l IRAYENN.I L SAND CREEK SPRING LANE CRE PRY AN[rlll[ E.NNE I ❑ rage xAM I 1 SCOTT CO. RnELi PARMI.;I.. It NIt t10G Sr, LAWRENCE JORDAN I ® 1 NILES 5 10 is ]D ], Instructions on Reverse Side 1 .*" rOF 9 ANOUNONAA I) nlcoR xn9xtl ]e OIII THE[ -/ 2 3 OROF l0 IOS91F LANE le xIFIol. ]e WHITE YEAR 0 /J ] 1... I V 9[4[x 11 noxi IRE[ 1uN I9 DART CL ]3 wNrtO SEAN H IST.'l oll Ix Y. L DI n. ]0 DI(Y ALL 3e unaRr a ucn uo9 14 Nnuor 21 MILLWOO 39 RLI PAUL e =1=41.O IG IT Um• xU9xn n FIAT OOo TO OAK LAND IN .U. NTI 3 Sea%ue le LA ur.ILE ]] PTF[ OMIDI 31 1 MANY AXONT e N[OI CIn LUL le uuO... uf 24 MExroYtel 32 rt, MANY tour ' Information pertaining to the Metro Bonus Bow Deer Area 1. Special bonus licenses are available at the County Auditor Office of Dakota, Scott, Carver, Hennepin, Anoka, and Washington Counties and from the DNR License Bureau at 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4026. 2. To purchase the bonus license, the hunter must present his/her general archery license. 3. No bonus licenses will be issued after November 7, 1986. 4. Only Antlerless deer may be taken with the bonus license. 5. Hunters who wish to participate in this hunt must obtain per- mission to hunt on private lands and must comply with all local ordinances, including obtaining any 'local permits that may be required. • 6. The Metro Bonus Bow Deer License allows an archer to take and tag a second deer only within the Metro Bonus Bow Area shown on the attached map. • 7. The bonus Metro License will be valid for those hunters drawn to participate in the Special Hunt Areas of Louisville Swamp, Crow -Hassan Park Reserve, Murphy-Hanrehan Park Reserve, and Fort Snelling State Park. 8. No person may tag more than 2 deer in any calendar year. 9. No person may hunt deer by any means in firearms Zone 1 who has any bonus license. 10. Metro Bonus Bow deer must be registered at a registration station within the seven -county Metropolitan Area. 7� .. lass .� _ _.. •,. _.._.., . BOW & ARROW DEER SEASON SHOOTING HOURS — OnehaH hour before.nriee foams, NOTE: All Ikensed bide game hunter who Ne hunting with bow and arrow Jell have their boon unstrung or eased during the time they are licerued to asks big game while lin the field between M1 minutes eft. the close of shooting hours and 30 minutes before the start of shooting hours, daily. TM 30 musus perusal before and after shooting hours b not extra hunting vans. — No IiPamlld bow bunter that oagp any elevated clear stand between pause, and ono hour before sonris. LICENSING RESTRICTIONS — — A liken. to vke diver by amber, issued alter Me opening of the ar- chery dear season Is not valid until the fifth deny altar It is issued. — No livenns, to .it. deo may be issued alter November g, 1986 except for bonus deer in Special Permit Arm. BOW SEASON ZONES DAYS OPEN SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA Than tart of Zone 4 south of Ow Sept. 1".h. 30, high.." from Fargo. St. Cloud rish...,excap 11494 am Stn. Hwy. 331 .n NOTE Mb.. NORTHERN MINNESOTA All of Zone l plus that, port of Sept. 13 - Dec. T Zane 2 north of State Hay. SS either roc, except and that Pass M Zone 4 earth of w NOTE bsi highways from Forest to St. Cloud 1194 mal Star. Hwy. 231 SOUTHEASTMINNESOTA All of Zone 3 ales that part of Zone Z Sept. 13. Dec. 31, south of hghway. from St. Cloud .itbr sex, except to Taylor Falls (Stata Hwy., 95 and 23) tr NOTE below. NOTE: Bow hunting for either sex Permitted. except that only legal bucks may be taken within a regular firearms zone when there is a regular fire- arms coach open therein, except for bonus licenses or as othemus, zi ellically authorized. Where an area is closed to firearms hunting within e Rrserms zone that I. open, bow and arrow hunter are nlll limited to buck. only hunting within the area closed to firearms. BONUS BOW HUNT —Special Metro Area — A bonus (second) bow and arrow dor license may W purchased to take a second deer by bow and arrowwithin certain Parts of the.ven coun- W Metro Are. — Hunters who wish to Participate In this hunt must obtain Permission to hunt on private lend (a, usual) and must comply with all local ordi- nances. including obtaining any local permits that may be, required (as .el). — Lken es, a map of the Metro Bow Area boundery, and Woial instruc. tion, aro ..liable at the Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Scott am Washington County Auditor's offices, eM from the DNR Licen. Bureau at 500 lafaye at Road, Sr. Paul. For additional information, wrist Metro Bonus Bow Hunt, Carlos Avery Game Form, Forest Lek., MN 55025. OTHER BONUS BOW HUNTS — Sea Bonus Dor Regulations — Panel. 1112. 13 STATE GAME REFUGES OPEN ONLY TO _ BQW AND ARROW HUNTING OF DEER AND BEAR NOTE: Most gems refuges contain privately owned IoM upon which the right to hunt III open) may be prohibited by the landowner. Unit County Unit County Bemkill Beltreml Polk -Clearwater Polk and Claremont Dodge Clearwater Goss Lake Crow Wing Sstlstons Pine East Minnesota Blue Earth Schoolcralt Hub0.rd ISept. 13-0e. 31 only) and L,Su.r (Sept. 13 -Ott. 31 only) Hiawatha Plp.tona Stillwater Washington Paul Bunyan Hubbard St. Croix River Washlngvn Waraz 13-00. 31 only) Swan Lake#1 fil Pine County Pine )only alter Scow sea.nl Units 1, 2, 3 — Also He Game Refugn lived. open on Panel 19. SPECIAL AREAS OPEN TO HUNTING DEER WITH BOW ONLY BY PERMIT PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS - - Appllcestion for a special bow hunt ere& permit must be made on a form supplied eeperrmly by ash sp vial bow hunt area. No other form of application will be accepted. — Send your request for the application farm with a stomped, self. addressed busin.s envelops to the ack ren Ihted for the special bow hunter. where you wish to hunt. SPECIAL BOW PERMIT AREAS OPEN _ Camp RIpM-Cavils announced separately. a Fort Snallirg Sute Park and Mlnnmv Valley NW R — see panel 24. Lake Louise State Park in Mower County is open to either -.x dor hunting by bow. Hunt.. may apply up to September R. 1985. Twenty -live (251 pomiv will be issued for the Period November 13.1 B. Bonus Over licensee will be available, sew panels 11-12. Radium" for application forme should aggless b addressed to Lake Louie Hunt, DNR Headquarters, 2300 Silver Geek Road NE. Rochester. MN 55904. • Loulallle Swamp Unit and Carver Rapids State Weyslde in Scott County ere open to either sex deer hunting except during the firearms.aeon when only legal butte may m taken. An unlimited number of permits will be Issued. There Is no deadline for applications. inquiries should be addressed to Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, 4101 East 80th St., Bloom Ington, MN 5542). Redyorenp clothing requirement must be met Nov. &16 and Nov. 22-28. • Crow -Haran Park Reserve in Hennepin County, it open to either sex den low hunting. Hunters may apply up to Sept. 8. 1986. Two hundred (200) Permits will De iewed for Nov. 1416. The orange/red clothing requirement of the firearms season must W mat. Requ.v for application forms should be addressed to Hennepin Parks How Hum, 3880 County Roel 24, Maple Plein, MN 55369. • Munphy'flanreh.n Park Become in Scott County is upon to Gilmer sax dear hunting. Hunte. inky apply up to Hep,. 8, 1986, Two hundred 12001 per- mits will be issued for Nov. 1416. The orange/red clothing requirement must be mat. Rryuens for application forms should bar adressN to - Hennepin Parks Saw Hunt. 3880 County Road 24, Maple Plain, MN 55369. •Metro Bonus Baw Llcan.s are with for pannl"hs In these hunts. 14 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three WAIVER OF PLAT/MWCC B_ Waiver of Plat to Split a 5..36 Acre' Parcel for the MWCC-- A, public hearing was held -,before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider a waiver of plat for 5.36 acres from a 32 acre parcel on the Cedar Industrial Park. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages _Z/ through For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page) • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for a_5.36 acre tract from a 32 .acre ,parcel as requested by the MWCC,. 7� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION LOCATION: TRACT "C" NW h, SECTION 17 EXISTING ZONING: L1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 26, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 15,, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat for" 5.36 acres from a -32 acre parcel in the Cedar Industrial Park. This site is located west of the intersec- tion of Blackhawk Road and Kennebec Drive. A building permit was issued in 1985 for this 33,000 sq. ft. maintenance facility. On October 1, 1985, the City Council denied a request to calculate user fees on a 5.5 acre area instead of the entire 32 acre parcel. The Waiver of Plat will create two separate legal descriptions with the fees (road user, water treatment surcharge, and parks dedication) for. the 5.36 acres due at the time of building occupancy. The remaining portion of Tract "C" will be subject to the same fee requirements at the time development occurs. . CONDITIONS: 1. All applicable Ordinances be adhered to. 2. This Waiver of Plat be subject to a parks dedication fee. 7� " •. E n�lla i )gFI1YFM FICIL III W.CF l ,r` .o � �[ � y u'•_ Ina /-w JR-1 eUFRrlM't •. / 1 / ' For SCALE;.1200' i 1.:.........l::µ:. 1Y•I li:� u::ei :r.`I •e::.::.: a nr»•u :. i� n.ea�u:.:a 1..�, � twuu.i:ny � . Ln. DWYRR i ASSOCIATES. INC. - Mown. I ` BOUNDARY SURVEY Y�•�1.e���Y cr ,' TRXT' C. j %c / . /• .. / / ,�} / 941e,09,T[Y 64S9Ym • I �• �t f .�• / , _ - - ____'� SEX ..il•2D 9t N L 5 929. /'/ RlOR91D1I0IVIiIX•d[• . r DEMDRt mIl01M 11C li { F1 . \�\\ -\ ,�° - .;; �['_ A!1(� L. � �:.:.1 •:::::wl.:. ::: s..::1°::n•1: w a.• :: �:N :::.,,v:�• / 1 / ' For SCALE;.1200' i 1.:.........l::µ:. 1Y•I li:� u::ei :r.`I •e::.::.: a nr»•u :. i� n.ea�u:.:a 1..�, � twuu.i:ny � . Ln. DWYRR i ASSOCIATES. INC. - Mown. I ` BOUNDARY SURVEY Y�•�1.e���Y cr ,' APC Minutes August 26, 1986 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing based upon the application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for a waiver of plat to split 5.36 acres from a 32 acre parcel known as Tract"C" located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 17, west of Highway #13, northwest of Comanche Road, was next convened.by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle provided information regarding compliance with ordinances and the impact .on assessments. There was no appearance from the public. Hall moved., Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the followinig: 1. All applicable Ordinances shall be adhered to. 2. The Waiver of Plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. Those in favor were McCrea, Trygg, Hall, Wilkins and Bohne; those against • were Harrison and Voracek. KILLDEER ADDITION - MICHAEL WILLS - REZONING Chairperson McCrea commenced the public hearing in regard to the request for rezoning from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single Family) for Lots 6 through 13, Block 1, Killdeer Addition, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #49 abutting Joyce Court. Mr. Runkle presentedthe application indicating that the previously platted duplex lots would be rezoned providing single family parcels, consisting of two duplex lots each. Mr. Michael Wills was present on behalf of his mother, and there were no appearances from the public. Harrison moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to compliance with all R-1 Code requirements. All voted yea. • APPLEBAUM FOOD MARKET, INC. (RAINBOW) - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT After an introduction by City Planner Runkle and discussion with Assistant City Attorney David Keller, it appeared that a conditional use permit was not required for the Rainbow Food Store located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Center 70 2nd Addition pursuant to City Ordinance Section 11.20, subd.'12.B.2. Off Sale Liquor, noting it is a permitted use in a CSC (Community Shopping Center.) McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend a refund of the conditional use permit application fee. All voted yes. t' 7 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Four Memo, City Council Meeting REZONING/KILLDEERADDITION C.. Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for Lot 6-13, Block 1, Killdeer Addition --A public hearing was held at the ,Advisory Planning Commission meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider a rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for certain lots in Block 1, Killdeer Addition. Action was taken by the APC to recommend approval of the rezoning,. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineer ng Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages �y through For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page( ACTION TO BE CONSIDEREDONTHIS ITEM: To approve rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for the Killdeer Addition. or deny the CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MICHAEL R WILLS LOCATION: LOTS 6-13, BLOCK 1, KILLDEER ADDN. (NE 1/4,SEC. 12) EXISTING ZONING: R-2, (DOUBLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 26, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 13,.1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by three separate property owners requesting a rezoning from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single Family) on Lots 6-13 in the Killdeer Addition. An amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will not be necessary since this area is designated as R-1. COMMENTS: The other .lots along Joyce Court (1-3 and 14-17) are zoned for single family dwellings. To the south. is another large single family lot and the R-2 Selmark Addition. West of Lot 6 is a NB (Neighborhood Business) district. The proposed lots have been stubbed for utilities. All proposed lots will exceed the minimum frontage requirements for R-1 lots and the square footages will be (6-7) 22,000 s.f., (8-9) 17,050 s.f., (10-11) 15,600 s.f., and (12-13) 24,700 s.f. ® The 3 property owners have signed the application along with a notary public. If approved, this rezoning shall be subject to all R-1 Code requirements. 5( . • N .1 II I\\ I A\ 11 _ I •^-{,�P�k fit. • 1 �•I� _ \ ,R 4 L1 !?3 - • _ JV OV I 1 � I 1 0 114.3- I W I I N 1 2. 0 - 9 -, N 14,300S.F r- 100-- r-90--I r--150— — i %-675- 49,9 �— — —---i90---- -- I I I \ I I 114.3 1 a 17 II _ 16 �� 15 I I -I - I I5,000S.F. I 13, 9005. F. I w,S00S.F.. 14 \ \ 4 1 a 3. i, 1 I I , -70 --/ / ' 2,500 S \ \1 15,3005F } �r 'Bow J L-67- S%48_0 3 R I —,SOJ 0 as 60 _-130 9�.. \ 2s6 — ---J "^--1�—=F I '^ 170 Fy F — — —336— -- Y \ n 59,000 sf. ° 1 5821 1®th N N N e � r APC Minutes August 26, 1986 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing based upon the application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for a waiver of plat to split 5.36 acres from a 32 acre parcel known as Tract"C" located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 17, west of Highway #13, northwest of Comanche Road,, was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle provided information regarding compliance with ordinances and the impact on assessments. There was no appearance from the public. Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the followinig: 1. All applicable Ordinances shall be adhered to. 2. The Waiver of Plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. Those in favor were McCrea, Trygg, Hall, Wilkins and Bohne; those against • were Harrison and Voracek. KILLDEER ADDITION - MICHAEL WILLS - REZONING Chairperson McCrea commenced the public hearing in regard to the request for rezoning from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single Family) for Lots 6 through 13, Block 1,, Killdeer Addition, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #49 abutting Joyce Court. Mr. Runkle presented the application indicating that the previously platted duplex lots would be rezoned providing single family parcels, consisting of two duplex lots each. Mr. Michael Wills was present on behalf of his mother, and there were no appearances from the public. Harrison moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to compliance with all R-1 Code requirements. All voted yea. APPLEBAUM FOOD MARKET, INC. (RAINBOW) - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT After an introduction by City Planner Runkle and discussion with Assistant City Attorney David Keller, it appeared that a conditional use permit was not required for the Rainbow Food Store located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Center 70 2nd Addition pursuant to City Ordinance Section 11.20, subd. 12.B.2. Off Sale Liquor, noting it is a permitted use in a CSC (Community Shopping Center.) McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend a refund of the conditional use permit application.fee. A11 voted yes. ON 2 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Five Memo, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 100 - 3RD ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat for Town Centre 100 - 3rd Addition Consisting of Two Lots and Two Outlots on Approximately 2.5 Acres --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider an application submitted by the Federal Land Company requesting a preliminary plat for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, in the Town Centre 100 - 1st Addition.• It was noted at the Planning Commission meeting that no building 'permits are being proposed with the platting process. This plat would allow an additional acre of land to be added to the daycare facility, in that the lot line was shifted during the fall of 1985. Also,the plat created approximately -a 3 acre parcel that would be dedicated to the City for park purposes. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to a report that was prepared by the Planning and Engineering Department found on pages Q % through Q9 . For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to page(s) C/Q ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or 'deny the preliminary plat as presented for Town Centre 100 - 3rd Addition. • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOWN CENTRE 100 THIRD ADDITION APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: NE4 OF SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 26, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 12, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 in the Town Centre 100 First Addition. COMMENTS: Lot 1, Block 1 is the Learning Tree Day Care facility located NE of the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Town Centre Drive. This site contains .83 acnes. On September 8, 1985 a Waiver of Plat was approved in order to expand this lot 15' further to the west due to the transmission line along the easterly 24' of the site. Condition number 1 required platting this lot at the time Outlot D was to be platted. The remainder of that outlot will now become Outlot A (13.08 ac). Lot 11 Block 2 is .a 3 acre strip measuring 111' x 1178' abutting the north side of O'Leary Park. Platting this lot along with the • dedication to the City will fulfill a requirement of the Eagan Heights Commercial. Park P.D. Agreement. This park has tentatively been scheduled for development in 1987. The remaining 8.6 acres south of Town Centre Drive will become Outlot .B (8.6 ac). CONDITIONS,: 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. SEE DETAIL N N9•IT 01 t - nr. !.'..-.7'R.AN:1, !i!V/ PLAT- RII M -64C .- ---- H J. i s D, w:7. Y-8 • . 2641.29 •-- - iY'.4 PJ KF_ F_ 0?):7CLE R:7.4 Di X CO. RD. -1111 -- aa --- -.-- 1o2546r -._ +a .,-P. +noo N0. 28 6000 ;._-14s2SU500----sao`IYANKEE, 40.00.:-4pooD00DLE--. ,600p1 ROAD) N, ,zZT,-- r-x�-5z-' •,: I- �ji23a- -.; -610.60- - I�zsa.o0 00 6T0.W A=TOASJ' a, ' l 1N - I- - - _ (. x50.00 ° TOWN CENTRE DRIVE :°J 4q ,..,Br,33Yt 31.97^ I op o se3.16'Is"E LOT 1 W o'o .,I A o -..11600 �j o b "' �m lP4ZP0d'L loop N WATER ELEV.-9,01.4 FL n 5P42!01!'E l"==^ lI`g IF. o •^ a APRIL 26, 198�5OUTLOT A &52.00 va: I 0¢; p: 945.409 -mo iST]Y OUTLOT4op p^ xq= %2 „ em L. t54.21 so42'9'9 R.234.e0 /LRAINA W 696.49 SURVEY 454209 74.00 LE -v 0o -TOWN_."iezei_ _ I n$ LINE ? / ow:: :••]s.6° BLOCK I e OUTLOT �:'y n :::.3300 AMD2 pi0p II 5 ,2'0l� 'R H W P `' // o��� Ne9.1z'S ::-200 $ .J 's +°p. OUTLOT D In SAI > - '753.87- u "'s 1 ( 6 • n :, - 5 a0.0Ddt d•! Daae 6 O _ \ Pr I• IN ,UTILITY o', 1 / f0i98' 311.59 y� \ y 4 p, CURVL G CURVE , - P' ( _ w \ yNQ / �R',''• - -. NeP1151 E'� W Y J •b \NNjI A. 250.59 C'- A•22.5i59' y�R N +' EASEME 1+, -- L. on]a °� 'ate �•': �.� �T/ p 6ruL�'w �6o p�� ao R. se1.a3 1 g L+2]0.59 Pc 49].J6 aa, 0, 1,'-•.•''v 59.10 py 8� p .Nc 9 5P4Yo0t N Hb W E- rn 1 I y7, ^ HF i I V f- �'% as 0\ Ppp\ (f• A"p- 165.- n.- ..9000 OUTLOT, a�.. '^ 5e 21 �' �O C Seri 5f� Iw 549•IY]I'W I nv 2 J i HI -•104.4! nn 3--- - A _••,�, n a K pc>'A F 7c - 0 110_tae _17.n4 i \ A3 253.39 -Q4,= - ioz.�e- - - 405.10 ~ L" A 12 nT i S�� �DRIVE.. 9•D+ ri Z n 1300_1391.95-' ]].00 •��.- .-IJ 0000.33606 W N9 II0W I twart 4sr;� -3300 -CENTRE-Nerrt51E ]]o -o-:-::-' ` efayez�4 - N64.4ri4't A•6T•0S'01'--(((( g56.oa- x5]90 16T'��• L: . ✓ Nor" Go I L. 234.17 25339 •-•"I, ` 52.a�+ Na9•d0dt I CURV[ R.200.0o III - i_ 5 0 ]2 5x34" . n .• �60.a0 .- rd 4V Y" L 143 45 • D �INA9E OUTLOTI B '�i yI� ° WATER ntV•ent n.l w o %O UTLOT C R 23000 - I' W I% b n APRIL II, 1905 • N • H AND IH8 01DRMNA0E AND SuavET LINE I S w dX - UTILITY [ASEMCMT �x y 1 UTILITY NL I r: NB YOgY T. 6 LA SENEMT 0 _ '� - .I --• 1]9252 -•- `'+.Es%r dna.-i02G0:... d: ; _'-660.45... lI' •___ S99.1T09�W - I 0({C1�W:�•:JOr--��N.�( 599.170Y'W'1 ' , I ,DuCICWCiJb \ Or 9 I N Y/f.Y/fl /PaovI YM IL i I 'f 0:4N I ikt I ob OUTLOT A I 8 L \/ 1 II OT I 1 a FJ, NTdN 1 100 I �. ;•,ry ll;a - 16L06K I YI[InA W y I 1 X, CN1VE Y/nYOh 1 fGwN YnYe(i =EN THE w ' FiItST=�----- �. A0011'ION OUTLOT 0 j� •F }_ ,T_1ir z I' T [ LOT 1 •n• BLOCK 2 mru /.nrati i' rrvun ouama Io• a.ral w nm Immo .Y u..ol. r ..1.1 V .rru wo-.ar aY wa.Vr W..Ir .1 tla 1. Ilva�. wa. ea [ V. Valu l rV WVY[ Y W Mlb 1. W .I.a..1 [4rV 111 r1 V1 ml[IYI. a1 I.tl 11 Ira .1 IItlV �ala�aa V Ora. Ytl Y. :1 raaa Wil• tl..l. na.aV b4 11 II.a1Var Irarl. M 4.V. • a [.ra.• ♦In a a:l as YleaaY 1. WIlra fOaY In n.•r uonlu I..Jltl. V . au.u. uuwr .+ ar aa�.Y rar�aa lu rb��ra Y. IIIIN. b. 1. Ilrf 1 L.111 M.1. LUIn tl. au.� • wl.u. y.la..- u.nor r. Ya 1. IIM l IM.11l V.Ia.' I.nnl r. -• 1...1.. .... -: I.Ia....Y. b..l. 1.111.... Y:1a. 1.....l.. r. .arlW.an rla. .1 r,Ylr arm a•.r•Vr _ r .= waw r...r a. w u. rI1Ff.[ Ir W /yr YIMV �aYW M Ir oa Ya .w•a APC Minutes August 26, 1986 TOWN CENTRE 100 THIRD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of Federal Land Company for a preliminary plat consisting of two lots and two outlots on approx-imately 2.5 acres located on Lot 1, Block 1, in Outlot C and D, Town Centre 100 First Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section 15, south of Yankee Doodle Road, abutting Lexington Avenue. City Planner Runkle presented the application, explaining the need for the small revisions provided. Mr. Charles Bartholdi on behalf of Federal Land Company appeared indicating that the platting was merely a "clean-up" and a waiver of plat was previously requested because of a utility line relative to the day care center and to provide park acreage to the City. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend 'approval of the preliminary plat, subject to compliance with all Code requirements. All voted in.favor. BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 REZONING • The next public hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea consisted of a request for preliminary plat and rezoning for 180 single family lots on approximately 98.5 acres with rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 33, east of Beacon Hill Addition, abutting Cliff Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the application indicating that the developer had now requested that the development be completed in two phases with the northerly 40 acres being the 2nd stage. Mr. Bill Mauer of Probe Engineering was present to provide information in regard to the proposed plat, including a 530 foot cul-de-sac variance, which would be the only variance within the proposal, and stated it was necessary due to the 70 foot change in topography. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation was present to discuss the timing and phasing of the project. Mr. Bill Walter of Beacon Hill Addition appeared requesting information • regarding fills and cuts. Mr. Greg Achterling of the Beacon Hill Addition appeared requesting information regarding street variances, regrading of low areas, water tables, and storm sewers. Richard Hefti provided information in regard to the tie in to the storm sewer system which would appear to facilitate the drainage of flood ponds in the Beacon Hill area. Mr. Rod Hardy also commented on the timing necessary in order to obtain such storm sewer facilities. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend a continuance of the public hearing in order to allow a neighborhood meeting to address the many questions presented at the hearing. All voted in favor. �J 3 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Six Memo, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY'PLAT/FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Fairway Hills 2nd Addition Consisting of 59 Single Family Lots on Approximately 25 Acres --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Derrick Land Company for the Fairway Hills 2nd Addition consisting of 59 lots and 25 acres. The APC is recommending approval of the application. For additional information on this item, refer to a report prepared by the Planning and Engineering Department found on pages through • For a copy of the action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to those minutes found on pages /(13 through The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the 2nd Addition and is proposing a cash dedication requirement, a trailway on Pilot Knob Road and further, that all previous condi- tions and agreements for providing the exchange of park land as agreed to in the Fairway Hills lst Addition be adhered to. There were three (3) additional conditions added to the approval of Fairway Hills 2nd Addition by the APC. Those conditions are as follows: 1) Proposed property would be notified of the pipeline easement of record to Williams Brothers Pipeline. 2) The property owners abutting the golf course will be notified of the use and potential impacts of the golf course. 3) The Building Inspection Department will be notified of the pipeline easement on 'Lot 2, Block 1 and special consideration shall be given in order that the building pad does not encroach on this easement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Fairway Hills 2nd Addition as presented. 9/ n LJ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat (Faiiway Hills 2nd Addition) APPLICANT: Derrick Land Company LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: NE a Section 34 R-1 (Single Family) 26 August 1986 14 August•1986 Planning &'Engineering Depts APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Derrick.Land Company requesting a preliminary plat for the Fairway Hills 2nd Addition. The 1st & 2nd Additions consist of 139 lots on 59.67 acres. The 1st Addition received preliminary plat approval on May 6, 1986 and final platting should occur in August or early September 1986. The 2nd Addition consists of 59. lots on 25 acres. The rezoning to R-1 for both additions was approved with the first phase. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will not be necessary. ZONING & LAND USE: Fairway Hills 2nd Addition is surrounded by the 1st Addition to the north, 15.30 acres of City parkland consisting of a neighborhood park facility and community soccer fields to the south, Parkview Golf Course to the east and Pilot Knob Road to the West. The Northern Natural Gas Company easement passes through the dividing line of the .1st & 2nd Additions and should not create any development problems except for the corner lot (lot 2) abutting the golf course. Even though there is street frontages of 125' & 130' the driveway access should be from the NIS street to eliminate any potential utility connection problems. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant's preliminary grading plan appears feasible as long as Northern Natural Gas Company permits grading within their gas line easement. All grading appears to meet City Code requirements with the exception of the east leg of the first three-way intersection east of Pilot Knob Road across from Delores Lane and the west leg of a three-way. intersection immediately east of this intersection. The west leg of the first intersection has a 68 slope while the east leg of the second intersection has a 38 slope. City Code requires a maximum 28._slope 100' from all street intersections. Staff feels that a variance would be in order for these two segments because this east -west street will be a main roadway for this development. Therefore, this roadway will more than likely be a through street. As such, the 28 flat landing area is not as necessary as it would be for a street where vehicles must stop. The existing topography 7 L FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 would make it extremely difficult to provide the 28 landing area without causing a steeper slope between the two intersections. The applicant's grading plan shows encroachment onto County road right of way. Dakota County is planning to upgrade Pilot Knob Road in 1987 and will undoubtedly do the grading in this area. The applicant's proposed grades reflect the final grades of Pilot Knob Road and it will be the developer's responsibility to coordinate his grading activities with that of the County's. The drainage pattern will remain the same with the drainage being to the north. The storm sewer that the developer is building under the first addition will be extended southerly to collect this runoff. This development shall be responsible for providing a storm sewer outlet to a dry pond that needs to be developed in the park area. UTILITIES: The developer will be extending utilities -of sufficient size, capacity and depth through the Fairway Hills 1st Addition up t to this development. These utilities can then be extended through this development to service it. Staff will recommend that sanitary sewer and water be extended from the south cul-de-sac to the southeast corner of this proposed development. The sanitary sewer line should be at a minimum elevation of 1035 to provide for future service to the parcels to the south. Also, this development shall stub sewer and water to the Parkview Golf Course down the stub street this development provides for. STREETS: The developer will be extending two streets from the Fairway Hills 1st Addition southerly to access this proposed development. The .developer also proposes to access this development off of Pilot Knob Road across from Rebecca Lane and eventually access Pilot Knob Road across from Delores Lane. The Delores Lane connection will not occur until Pilot Knob Road is graded and rebuilt. This alignment and access points are consistent with what the developer orginally proposed during the preliminary platting process for the Fairway Hills Addition. The developer is proposing to stub a street access to the Parkview Golf Course. The developer indicates he does not wish to construct a temporary cul-de-sac at this location and the City does not want the developer to construct a dead-end street. Therefore, the developer suggested curving the street at the intersection of the east -west and north -south street, prepaying the equivalent street assessment for the stubbed street not constructed, and constructing a private driveway to the easterly most lot on that stub street. Staff agrees with this under the condition that the developer enter into an agreement whereby the easterly most lot agrees to maintain the private driveway within public right-of-way and also that the easterly most lot, the lot immediately west and the corner lot across the street enter into an agreement acknowedging the public' right-of-way and the City's right to construct a public street within that right-of-way to the Parkview Golf Course when the golf course develops. FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 3 Because Pilot Knob Road is a minor arterd al within Eagan, City policy requires trailways be constructed along each side. Therefore•, this development will be responsible for an 8' bituminous trailway along the entire frontage of Pilot Knob Road. PERMITS: This development will be responsible for applying and obtaining permits and/or approvals from the following agencies: 1. MPCA - sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC - sanitary sewer extension approval. 3. Mn Dept of Health - watermain extension permit. 4. Northern Natural Gas - grading within easement permit. 5. Dakota County - work within right-of-way and utility crossing permits. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development proposes to dedicate the • City standard 60' right-of-way for internal streets,. This development shall also dedicate a minimum 65' half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road. In order to protect the integrity of the proposed backyard drainage swails adjacent the Northern Natural Gas pipeline, staff- recommends this developer dedicate a minimum of a 40' drainage and utility easement over the backyards of these lots. This easement may be reduced in width if Northern Natural Gas Company allows the drainage swail to be located entirely within their easement rather than being centered on the southerly easement line as the grading plan shows. Likewise, in order to protect the integrity of the backyard drainage swails within the interior block, staff recommends that a 10' drainage easement be dedicated adjacent the rear lot lines as shown on Figure 2. Staff will require a 30' minimum easement width over the sanitary sewer and water main that the developer is required to extend to the southeasterly most corner of this proposed development. Finally, any public utility not located within public right-of-way will require a minimum 20' drainage and utility easement centered over it. Otherwise, this development shall dedicate all other easements• as required by City Code. ASSESSMENTS: This development will be responsible for all assessments outlined in the preliminary report for the Fairway Hills Addition prepared by the Engineering and Planning Departments dated March 17, 1986. For informational purposes, staff is enclosing the Assessment Summary Table and F.igure 2 from that report. Since the overall preliminary report of the Fairway Hills Addition, the developer has swapped land with the Parks Department and obtained more frontage along Pilot Knob Road. Therefore, this development will be responsible for an additional 417' of Pilot Knob Road street improvements at 1/4 the residential equivalent rate and also an 8' 'trailway along this section. The following table summarizes these additional assessments and Figure 3 illustrates them. FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 4 The final assessments will be based upon the rates in effect at the time -of final platting. r� U • 9� , ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Description 'Est'd Qty 1986 Rate Amounts Co. Rd. Improvements 417 f.f. $ 8.44/f.f. $3,520 Trailway 417 f.f. $11.81/f.f. 4,925 TOTAL $8,445 The final assessments will be based upon the rates in effect at the time -of final platting. r� U • 9� , Page 5 CONDITIONS: FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION 1. A variance to the 28 grades at intersections be granted as discussed within this report. 2. This development shall'extend utilities to its southeasterly most corner and also to the easterly boundary within the right- of-way stub to the Parkview Golf Course. 3. The developer shall provide the necessary documents whereby the owner of Lot 1, adjacent to the golf course and between the public street and the park area, agree to maintain a private driveway within public right-of-way. 4. The developer shall also prepare documents whereby the owner of Lot 1 and 2 of the block adjacent the golf course and between the public street, and also the owner of Lot 2 in the block north of the Northern Natural Gas Company easement and adjacent the golf course, acknowledge the existance of public right-of- way and the right of the City to construct a residential street within that right-of-way upon development of the golf course property. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary regulatory agency permits prior to the City releasing the final plat for recording. 6. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 65' half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and 60' full right-of-ways for internal public roads. 7. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 3.0' utility easement over the sanitary sewer and watermain extended to the southeasterly most corner of this development and a • minimum of a 20' utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. This development will be required to dedicate a 40' drainage easement over the backyards adjacent the Northern Natural Gas pipeline and a 10' drainage easement adjacent to rear lot lines used for drainage swails. This development will be responsible for providing a 30' temporary construction easement along all lots adjacent to Pilot Knob Road north of the Rebecca Lane street extension. 8. This development shall be responsible for the remaining trunk area•, street improvements and trailway assessments not covered by the Fairway Hills 1st Addition. This development shall also be responsible for the additional street and trailway assessments for frontage along Pilot Knob Road as a result of the parkland swap at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 9. All standard plan conditions shall be adhered to. 10. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks & Rec Commission and subject to /their recommendations. 91 A; 0 PARKVIEWGOLF COURSE 1 i+ I a a • I • � �/ x ) cors.. lane ,Delo p A PAR • w rYr.OM 1 � y. r lYq — / /ter .�x xr n�J /`x /I • .. Nr "� i_ r qnr r Il• ar a r• el'r / �/ r• r Il n' I l• +� +� Y II _ `• 1: rover .+a rou / / / _ ._ •...r• •.. r• 1 1 oceEGLA UNE GENERAL INFORMATION unrwe re+v.�.eucwm•u mru ,ru, q.ur .em w raeroue ,o++•, a-• ..er•elrmu rl.w rd. rt. er. ur. r uO L+u.:"101"1.1.1 u/r wYu. gmrY ur Wlr. rEll .1111 ner .el !el'. .1.111 ee.Ir. wu .-n r+.0 r•Ir ILL u.I I.-" .eu -I' ee .rcua .M +r+u+ l6eal .o. rr. uu Emmem .n+.. Yraurm! •r rr uu.a w!. Road m wa+la+r m rruruur ++o m rury ,o w.0 a. W lu. n.r. nuvui r ueo Loran ENDIN/IIIINO I. COMPANYIo IINC. w WI IliMIt YYru.1. •wYW! lrYr n.rl.wee LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION Nu4 1'•rM ; ��' 'DlRRICIi LAND X00.1 Y. ram PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE \cuu raY GENERAL INFORMATION \.n W\ low•m. Y•aailru. miu \reu I\Xa lmu u/; rllorono \owG •-. unYm lei un: X.1p wI•. n•Y du \. v .u,r \ILuur l01 wuu 1-n rnm \-u .1111016 --I \Wi•\\ .l IY \X.Ya lu\,1 y. pYIYiOY .X rlli\YYY. YO Y\ .Y\LC/ IO GI.W O. IW IW.I Il.t. nae/ I08 I1 6 �r•IYr\i M1\Y/\I l\.. IWrIR\l ENOIN44AINO _ -• COMPANY INC. aT M\ IYI V,Y!'llll•IYXIYi. XYI X\Y-\Ow P� Nru1o\Y u PRELJMINARY GRADING PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND • 7 DEFIRICK LARD CD. a • r / r • • .• a .] Ia 0 / i't , ] ]— r / 1 r - fi r„ ] . eye .r• �. IIiYtY•y 11 1: Xor •.M \aX. / / GENERAL INFORMATION \.n W\ low•m. Y•aailru. miu \reu I\Xa lmu u/; rllorono \owG •-. unYm lei un: X.1p wI•. n•Y du \. v .u,r \ILuur l01 wuu 1-n rnm \-u .1111016 --I \Wi•\\ .l IY \X.Ya lu\,1 y. pYIYiOY .X rlli\YYY. YO Y\ .Y\LC/ IO GI.W O. IW IW.I Il.t. nae/ I08 I1 6 �r•IYr\i M1\Y/\I l\.. IWrIR\l ENOIN44AINO _ -• COMPANY INC. aT M\ IYI V,Y!'llll•IYXIYi. XYI X\Y-\Ow P� Nru1o\Y u PRELJMINARY GRADING PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND • 7 DEFIRICK LARD CD. i / L _ GENERAL •^••. 1.1 1 I. rmr LOIS: 1.1 norouo .ouw . \ u.un ml ISIS: ¢w .o. rl. uou 44 c r .ISIS r.uun wl un: Aeu ..w rwu �-u ALL 4..r LOIS WEST 4 4[m lw W—M 'IAe..o. rt. ............1\. .. IS I.O. r.OL .\ lY L.14fI L.:l. •. yy Y``11 I 1 W W..W.\ A.. r..LY...' .i ..r Lu.AOI \e GA.. SO 1. /iY r4\. L;ca'6.411 IAIN0OMPRNM INC. ON OM a 11.111, "WRL,,,IYll", 11X1 I. OI•I,M "" ro .LOIS r..w I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2N VICINITY MAP . ,1ESt1T R — LOA 1, 1 ' IPARKVIEW GOLF COURSE i J • r s , • r ,. a ,r A 0 / / �•/ r � — J J N — / � / IS I• MeI ..D•!WO I I i / L _ GENERAL •^••. 1.1 1 I. rmr LOIS: 1.1 norouo .ouw . \ u.un ml ISIS: ¢w .o. rl. uou 44 c r .ISIS r.uun wl un: Aeu ..w rwu �-u ALL 4..r LOIS WEST 4 4[m lw W—M 'IAe..o. rt. ............1\. .. IS I.O. r.OL .\ lY L.14fI L.:l. •. yy Y``11 I 1 W W..W.\ A.. r..LY...' .i ..r Lu.AOI \e GA.. SO 1. /iY r4\. L;ca'6.411 IAIN0OMPRNM INC. ON OM a 11.111, "WRL,,,IYll", 11X1 I. OI•I,M "" ro .LOIS r..w I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2N VICINITY MAP . ,1ESt1T R — LOA 1, , I Mims KOS 'bEN1+IClt ulro 1`.fa � Y 1 ' , I Mims KOS 'bEN1+IClt ulro 1`.fa � Y E • I LEGEN D nonimommm�uumm �lTrUfGE �i'KE.�T •••••••• TIZAIL`NAY APC Minutes. August 26, 1986 FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairperson McCrea next convened the public hearing in regard to the request of Derrick Land Company for preliminary plat approval consisting of 59 single family lots on approximately- 25 acres, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 34, at the southeast quadrant of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application which was the second phase of the proposed development, which is now possible because the park area had been defined. Mr. Bill Mauer of Probe Engineering was present to describe the development which actually consisted of 60 single family homes with the total for the two additions being 138 single family homes. Mr. Don Larson of the Parkview Golf Course appeared indicating that the fee owner of the property had been notified in regard to this development, and was concerned for the children and.future homeowners of the lots backing up to the golf course due to stray golf balls and the opportunity for children to wander on to the golf course and into the ponds. There was discussion in regard to liability for any personal injuries or damages to owners of homes in the area, in addition to the ability to build upon a lot which included gas line easement area. Mr. Mauer indicated that the lots adjacent to the golf course would be 142 feet in depth. Mr. Larson recommended that a fence be constructed to keep children out of the golf course. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance to the 2% grades at intersections shall be granted as discussed within this report. 2. This development shall extend utilities to its southeasterly most corner and also to the easterly boundary within the right-of-way stub to the Parkview Golf Course. 3. The developer shall provide the necessary documents whereby the owner of Lot 1, adjacent to the golf course and between the public street and the park area, agree to maintain a private driveway within public right-of-way. 4. The developer shall also prepare documents whereby the owner of Lot 1 and '2 of the block adjacent to the golf course and between the public street, and also the owner of Lot 2 in the block north of the Northern Natural Gas Company easement and adjacent to the golf course, acknowledge the existence of public right-of-way and the right of the City to construct a residential street within that right-of-way upon development of the golf course property. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary regulatory agency permits prior to the City releasing the final plat for recording. 6. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 65 foot half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and a 60 foot full right-of-way for internal public roads. • APC Minutes August 26, 1986 . 7. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 30 foot utility . easement over the sanitary sewer and water main extended to the southeasterly most corner of this development and a minimum of a 20 foot utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. This development will be required to dedicate a 40 foot drainage easement over the back yards "adjacent to the Northern Natural 'Gas pipeline and a 10 foot drainage easement adjacent to rear lot lines used for drainage swails. This development will be responsible for providing a 30 foot temporary construction easement along all lots adjacent to Pilot Knob Road north of the Rebecca Lane. street extension. 8. This development shall be responsible for the remaining trunk area, street improvements and trailway assessmenfs.not covered by the Fairway Hills 1st Addition. This development shall also be responsible for the additional street and trailway assessments for frontage along Pilot Knob Road as a result of the parkland swap at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. ® 9. All standard plan conditions shall be adhered to. 10. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and shall be subject to their recommendations. 11. Home buyers shall be notified, by the developer or its agents and assigns of the risks of being adjacent to the golf course and gas line in negotiating for lots adjacent to these facilities. 12. The Building Inspection Department shall closely monitor the construction of the dwelling on the corner lot backing to Parkview Golf Course and across by the gas line easement. All voted yea. • SUNPOINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened was in regard to Sunpointe Addition by Advance Developers consisting of 90 townhouse units on approximately 10.5 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 20, west of Blackhawk Road, abutting Diffley Road. After the public hearing was convened by Chairperson McCrea, City Planner Runkle described the planned phases of this planned development designated for multiple use. Mr.. Robert Carlson was present on behalf of the developer and provided information in regard to the 50 foot buffer between neighboring properties and the description of the units similar to the Southpoint units on the south side of Diffley Road. Mr. John Willenburg of 4068 Magnetite Point appeared objecting to the large area of high density in this particular neighborhood. Mr. Dennis Castle of 1835 Jade Lane appeared requesting information in regard to the planned development. He also proposed a phasing for lower density units in the northern part of the parcel and requested that the City consider additional parks and Erailways. Mr. Randy Raddatz of 4064 Magnetite Point requested /d- 5 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Seven Memo, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUNPOINTE ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat for Sunpointe Consisting of 90 Townhouse Units on Approximately 10.5 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider an application from RMC Development and Advance Developers for a preliminary plat entitled Sunpointe Townhouses consisting of 90 townhouse units on 10.5 acres. The APC is recommending approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report found on pages 1,04 through //y The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending that three addi- tional conditions be added to the approval. Those conditions are as follows: 1) A homeowners association agreement and bylaws be reviewd by the City prior to final approval. 2) The density not be transferred from this development to the outlot or remainder of land to be developed. 3) The buffer area, as stated in the planning development agreement, be provided in accordance with the agreement. For action that was taken by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, please refer to the Administrative Agenda that will be circulated on Monday. For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to those minutes found on page(s) ZQ- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS • preliminary plat for Sunpointe on approximately 10.5 acres. ITEM: To approve or deny the consisting of 90 townhouse units /Q m • SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: APPLICATION: CITY OF EAGAN Preliminary Plat (Sunpointe) RMC Development & Advance Developers SW; Section 20 (Multiple) within Eagan Hills West P.D. 26 August, 1986 15 August, 1986 Planning & Engineering Department An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for Sunpointe Townhouses. This plat consists of 90 townhouse units on 10.5 acres on the north side of Diffley Road directly across the road from the existing Southpoint Courtyard Homes. ZONING 6 LAND USE This area of the Eagan Hills West PD is zoned high density or 12+ units per acre. The plat will have an over-all density of 8.6 units per acre. The 10.5 acres will be divided into 9 separate lots, 6 containing 12 unit buildings and 3 with 6 unit buildings. The remaining 44.35 acres will become Outlot A. Adjacent land uses include small agricultural parcels to the east and the Rahn Subdivision to the northeast, the Outlot with similar density to the north and west and the Southpoint homes on the south side of Diffley Road. SITE PLAN/BUILDING DETAILS The, first phase of development will be serviced from the Sunpointe Circle cul-de-sac. This cul-de-sac will connect to the proposed Beaver Dam Road loop extension. The tear drop island in the cul-de-sac will be landscaped and maintained by an association. This association will also be responsible for snow and trash removal. All building/parking setbacks exceed Code requirements. Attached parking is provided for each unit with additional guest space in front of the garage door. The land is primarily rolling grassland with scattered tree stands. The proposed landscape plan will be similar to that across Diffley Road except that the area along Diffley will have an interrupted berm with a variety of plant materials. A11:7 SUNPOINTE APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 The proposed buildings will be the same as the Southpoint Courtyard Homes. Over half of those 48 units were sold in the initial seven weeks of marketing. The low maintenance aluminum siding will come in 3 colors and 3 unit floor plans will be available. These units range in price from the low $60's to high 80's. Amenities include: built in microwaves, oak woodwork, vaulted ceilings, sunken living rooms, main floor laundry areas, private entries, triple glassed windows and redwood decks. Available options include central air conditions with built in humidifiers, fireplaces, water softeners and a security system. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the applicant proposes is feasible and meets all City Codes and requirements. However, the grading will slightly change existing drainage patterns for Pond AP -4 and Pond AP -35. The grading plan proposes to shift this drainage divide .slightly to the northeast, thereby increasing the tributary area to Pond AP -35 by about 2 acres and decreasing the tributary area to Pond AP -4 by the same. This is shown in Figure 1. Staff does not believe this minor change in tributary areas will significantly affect either Pond AP -35 or Pond AP -4. However, neither pond presently has a positive gravity outlet. Both ponds accept runoff from developed areas at the present time. Staff recommends that as a condition of final plat approval the City Council authorize the trunk storm sewer gravity outlet for Pond AP - 4. Although Pond AP -35 is within 1' of the Comprehensive Plan highwater elevation, there is no property adjacent to it which would be adversely affected if this pond floods for the time being. Staff feels it would be more appropriate for further development to occur in order to determine an alignment for the outlet to the west for Pond AP -35. Staff recommends requiring the developer to extend erosion control measures adjacent the entire grading limits that are adjacent to AP - 4. UTILITIES: Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist adjacent this proposed site to provide the necessary service to this proposed development. The applicant proposes on extending an 8" water main north along Beaver Dam Road from the existing 18" water main within Diffley Road. Staff does not feel. the County will allow an open cut on Diffley Road to make this connection. Instead, staff recommends that the developer connect to the existing 18" water main at its southeasterly property corner where the trunk water main is located within the boulevard area. In this case, the developer can extend a 6" line to connect to the 6" line he is proposing to extend from the Art Rahn Addition. At the point where they meet, the line shall be increased to an 8" line and extended westerly to Beaver Dam Road. The applicant proposes on extending the sanitary sewer north along Beaver Dam Road from Diffley Road. The existing sanitary sewer manhole is located near the edge of Diffley Road where the developer proposes to extend Beaver Dam Road to the north. /0 M SUNPOINTE APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 3 This development will have a future problem in obtaining sanitary sewer service to the northwest corner of this development. This area is too low to be serviced from the existing sanitary sewer at Beaver Dam Road. For this area to develop, either a lateral line will have to be constructed from a trunk line in Jade Lane or Rahn Road, or this corner of the development will have to construct their own pumping station. However, this does not affect this particular development. STREETS: This development has access to only one existing street, that being Diffley Road (County Road 30). The preliminary plat proposes to extend Beaver Dam Road north in a "U' -shaped configuration with the other access point being about 7401 west. The westerly access is flexible and need not be exactly determined until such time as the remaining .area of this development develops. The final location of this westerly access point will require ® approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. This development proposes to extend Beaver Dam Road as a 34' (back - of -curb to back -of -curb) width street. However, because of the density proposed and anticipated future high density in this area, staff recommends that the minimum width of this street be 36' face to face. Staff estimates that upon full development, this 60 acres of multi -family residential could generate an average daily traffic volume of about 3,000 vehicles per day. The internal street for this development is a private street. This private street and the private driveways all meet City Code requirements. One of the requirements for this development is that all the private driveways to the buildings shall have concrete curbing, with the private drive having concrete curb and gutter. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The 60' proposed public right-of-way that this development will dedicate for Beaver Dam Roadis adequate. This development has provided the necessary right-of-way for Diffley Road in the form of a highway easement. For clarity purposes, this development shall dedicate this right-of-way on the plat. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' utility easement over the proposed water main and sanitary sewer not located within public right-of-way. This development will also be responsible for dedicatingthe necessary ponding and utility easements for Pond AP -4, along with Pond AP -35, to encompass their respective high water elevations. PERMITS: This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits for the following: 1. Sanitary sewer extension from MPGA. 2. Sanitary sewer extension approval from MWCC. 3. Water main extension from Mn. Dept. of Health. 4., Utility crossing permit from Dakota County. SUNPOINTE APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 4 TRAILWAYS: In updating the Master Trail Plan for the City, staff is proposing a trailway along the north side of Diffley Road. Therefore, it will be this development's responsibility for an 8' trailway along Diffley Road. ASSESSMENTS: According to the City's assessment records, the only trunk related assessment this development is responsible for is, lateral benefit from trunk water main installed within Diffley Road under Project 64. Staff recommends that this development be responsible for its entire frontage along Diffley Road at one-half the lateral benefit from the trunk water main rate in effect at the time of final platting. The benefit from this trunk water main is related to looping for flow and pressure but not direct service. In these instances, staff recommends assessing one-half the regular rate. The assessable footage this development will be responsible for will be the entire frontage along Diff.ley Road less the 60' proposed right-of-way and a 150' corner lot credit at the east and west end. This amounts to approximately 1,6801. The total amount • of lateral benefit from trunk water main this development will be responsible for will be approximately $9,980. The frontage along Cliff Road associated with Block 1 of this development will be due at the time of final platting either by direct payment or assessed by Waiver. This amounts to approximately $4,135 (696' @ $5.94 per front foot) as shown in Figure 2. All remaining costs associated with developing this property, with the exception of trunk' storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility of this development. 0 I°9 CONDITIONS: SUNPOINTE PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. The Council must authorize the construction of a trunk storm sewer outlet to Pond AP -4 prior to final plat approval. 2. The minimum street width shall be 36' for public streets. 3. The internal private street shall have concrete curb and gutter with the internal private drives having concrete curbing. 4. The water main must be connected at the southeast corner of this development. This connection may be made with a 6" main, but where this connection ties into the southerly extension of the 6" main from the Rahn Addition,, it shall be increased to an 8" water main for extension westerly'throughout this site. 5. This development is responsible for obtaining the necessary permits or approvals from MPCA, MWCC, MN Department of Health and the Dakota County Highway Department prior to release of plat documents -for recording. 6. This development will be responsible for an 8' bituminous trailway along..the north side of Diffley Road. 7. This development will be responsible for its lateral benefit from trunk wat-ar•main at one-half the rate in effect at the time of final platting. B. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' width utility easement over.:all publicly owned utility lines not located within public, right-of-way. 9. This development shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond AP -4 and Pond AP -35. • 10. This development shall also post the south side of the private drive as: "Eire Lane - No Parking" and restrict parking along Beaver Dam Road at all times. 11.. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. All trash must be kept in the individual garages until the day of pick up by one collector. 13. The developer be responsible for the maintenance of the cul-de-sac island. 14. A financial guarantee for the landscaping ensuring proper install- ation and sizes shall not be released until one full year after completion. E Pre&nhw y Pl&t of- SUN POINT for: R M. Q Devel6pment, corp. a Advance Dev , elopersinc. :L �, Ph, /,n \ r— I l� I dr -L, 0 i Vill,' L - rx- 01,� t .j 1� r 2 7- oil— y ;6/ Lr j — — — — -- — — — — — — — -- 2m F 2 w I CmIR slab I. J' T.. W. C—R. W-ENDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ST.PA��MTA 5UM 'B�B. �VaiER x899.8 ..-- 1 1 , \ 1 BB9J \ M 895`, r� x.wL.. O I � PDNo x 890, /1 o{,Ra en dl 0 � 12-1 If, 9 x89/.8 Millo B 99 _ `. Broll @-� n r C�p m Aac �\'�' \ 1 /•. .r / a y,� �JI4M miej. \ enxel Sc •On 30 ,{ (DIFFLEY ROAD) d��. •,^ N -"� c.e, m •, �_a rPm. c v .. io ,n I CI Church I > O a .p. m w ¢ SUN _ mF CLIFF -- — Q THIRD ADDITION Preliminary Site Plan of.- SUN POINT RTME for: R.M.C. Development, Corp. 9 lee,m., ex,lll•,.a...,a—c��e..Ary-a•-- ow,w.. zn n• s. a.a•,a �,issL Advance Developers, Inc. N I' T.I..1. Ixs•�.. ••u I. e. e,.,l•,u so w. I•la I6 Ix-w mV:. a, . • stl= ew" u, wu w w. naa mw SCALE. I' . 00' n.R✓ H C. R. WwDEN 6 ASSOCIATES, NQ =1 {w•i•r w u"I •leo 1•Itl Lup R4MIf N1M.Ye { SRE R9O1 Pom PeLLq w 2x - Ite lelll M LW S6 Sil¢Si 2-75 slw w USI . z.9 Ima Ofd 30 a (DIF Church I ala I I SUN I MY CLIFF a THIRD Preliminary Grading, Drainage a Erosion Control Plan of: SUN POINT for: R.M.C. Development, Corp. 9 Advance Developers, Inc. ADDITION N scALE: I'• sa Vortical Col.. - N.G.V.D. 929 7 Proposed Contour Interval Deroles'CUT'Areo Derotn'FILL' Ana DeroteeEn"r f•nu or Eauival enl for Ereelea Control. R...r Y C. R. WPIDEN a ASSMATES, PIC, L1 PL•NN'. "A Yll l 9rE �90x .a sum n�cr ,r. r.u. v..<mr• ,an X 899. B x B9 1 .a I I i • B9o../ I I RD en Q B di o:r dl \\ a Ny B ��\ � _' � \\ Jam/ � /� \ II BDpdNy . . e91. B I I I 'I f� � v �. MJID B r 2T 1 Unil -17 TER i- i '� 12 -UNI ' U _ p t Building u I Wenzel Mmw' •Ot 30 a (DIFFLEY ROAD e, 1 �. =4 M1 Church I > b Ie n= p a 0 I SUN m i - CUFF I o THIRD ADDITION - I Preliminary Utility Loyou! of.- SUN POINT ROTE=eTL:a`4m`� 1•ISMIs p •Illlir Y,�t �•+WE •�-SlJr� for: R.M.C. Development, Corp. 8 N„Ea,,,,m..•,,,,•.�,r,rll�e,..•�.�•d = _ Advance Developers, Inc. Il SCALE: 1' • 50' .. R. WHEN d ASSOCIATES, PSC. L � e ' E art CE9ful E-] ,J 115 Ah � r m p+ibOSP ; :r • t - M 0 0 0 r 'Yi .µII....,I II i t,I . ', i'• - COUNTY---'----_- Ao---i--- \ YUOa:Wro "allI Coln e..Y.hr L�.✓o ADDITION= RECflyEOJOL Lf W . ......r ,.....-... e x _ 22� LATEKAL bENEFIT TP-UNK WATE,CMAIN \k j c ... . \ I � I ':`�`'. ' t' L V. -7- j.7 o ... �•f IF :' y /"•"•r.,,.�. ice.. I•r. O. .I u�l 'y'. r.• .� l� �r x.111 .1. a . •I Q I', n .I. y.ry waFfrti '3... u )* m �f11lll ,LJ � —iiDlfiLE-POPDI- •� ��_;— `•.. J 1 `I 1 v/ � "/_; 4w a I . 1....A I'IyI11 iYX I m; I I QIII 1 j r TNIA 0 ADDITION 1 , I 1 C. R. WINDEN d ASS( 1741 ._ LAIN fLANwrIG SWYEYS ^E .>✓V�... L. ST. PAM, Y SOTA was ._.... ....__......._. Ti .qwq 'M 'WA 11 Rk APC Minutes August 26, 1986 7. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 30 foot utility easement over the sanitary sewer and water main extended to the southeasterly most corner of this development and a minimum of a 20 foot utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. This development will be required„to; dedicate a.40;foot drainage easement over the back yards adjacent to 'th'e Northern Natural Gas pipeline and a 10 foot drainage easement adjacent to rear lot lines used for drainage swails. This development will be responsible for providing a 30 foot temporary construction easement along all lots adjacent to Pilot Knob Road north of the Rebecca Lane street extension. 8. This development shall be responsible for the remaining trunk area, street improvements and trailway assessmdnts not covered by the Fairway Hills 1st Addition. This development shall also be responsible for the additional street and trailway assessments for frontage along Pilot Knob Road as a result of the parkland swap at the rates in effect at the time -of final platting. 9. All standard plan conditions shall be adhered to. 10. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and shall be subject to their recommendations. 11. Home buyers shall be notified by the developer or its agents and assigns of the risks of being adjacent to the golf course and gas line in negotiating for lots adjacent to these facilities. 12. The Building Inspection Department shall closely monitor the construction of the dwelling on the corner lot backing to Parkview Golf Course and across by the gas line easement. All voted yea. &'` SUNPOINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened was in regard to Sunpointe Addition by Advance Developers consisting of 90 townhouse units on approximately 10.5 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 20, west of Blackhawk Road, abutting Diffley Road. After the public hearing was convened by Chairperson McCrea, City Planner Runkle described the planned phases of this planned development designated for multiple use. Mr. Robert Carlson was present on behalf of the developer and provided information in regard to the 50 foot buffer between neighboring properties and the description of the units similar to the Southpoint units on the south side of Diffley Road. Mr. John Willenburg of 4068 Magnetite Point appeared objecting to the large area of high density in this particular neighborhood. Mr. Dennis Castle of 1835 Jade Lane appeared requesting information in regard to the planned development. He also proposed a phasing for lower density units in the northern part of the parcel and requested .that the City consider additional parks and -trailways. Mr. Randy Raddatz of 4064 Magnetite Point requested /ZO 5 APC Minutes August 26, 1986 information in regard to owner/occupancy. Mr. Carlson indicated that VA and FHA loans all require owner/occupancy. Mr. Mark Brown of 1849 Kathryn Circle appeared requesting information in regard to the pond elevation on the eastern portion of the parcel, potential assessments and utility extensions. Ms. Leslie Klein of 4060 Magnetite Point appeared objecting to the number of multi -family homes and apartments in the area and the impact on the values of single family homes. Diane Hasselquist of 1845 Kathryn Circle appeared requesting information regarding assessments. Mr. James Ashworth of 4235 Blackhawk Road expressed concern regard traffic flow. Mrs. Murray Hakala, a Diffley Road resident, appeared requesting information in regard to the buffer to the west of her property. Harrison objected to a piecemeal approach to the development of this portion of the PD. All recommended that a homeowners association be required as a condition' in. addition to the inability to transfer density. There was significant discussion about the problems associated with private tot lots.. Trygg moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Council shall authorize the' construction of a trunk storm sewer outlet to Pond AP -4 prior to final plat approval. 2. The minimum street width shall be 36 feet for public streets. 3. The internal private street shall have.concrete curb and gutter with the internal private drives having concrete curbing. 4. The water main shall be connected at the southeast corner of this development. This connection may be made with a 6 inch main, but where this connection ties into the southerly extension of the 6 inch main from the Rahn Addition, it shall be increased to an 8 inch water main for extension westerly throughout this site. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits or approvals from MPCA, MWCC, MN Department of Health and the Dakota County Highway Department prior to release of plat documents for recording. 6. This development shall be responsible for an 8 foot bituminous trailway along the north side of Diffley Road. 7. This development shall be responsible for its lateral benefit from trunk water main at one-half the rate in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20 foot width utility easement over all publicly owned utility lines not located within public right-of-way. 9. This development shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond AP -4 and Pond AP -35. 10. This development shall also post the south side of the private drive as: "Fire- Lane - No Parking" and restrict parking along Beaver Dam Road at all times. /a/ 6 4 APC Minutes August 26, 1966 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. All trash must be kept in the individual garages until the day of pick up by one collector. 13. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the cul-de- sac island. 14. A financial guarantee for the landscaping ensuring proper installation and sizes shall not be released until one full year after completion. 15. That a homeowners association shall. be established in accord with City staff approval. 16. The reduction in density to the City will not be transferable to • other portions of the Planned Development. 17. A 50 foot buffer shall be maintained between the buildings and neighboring parcels. All voted in favor except Wilkins and Harrison who voted no. JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was the preliminary plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition by Good Value Homes, Inc. consisting of 12 townhouse units on approximately 4 acres located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 33, south of Cliff Road and east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application. Mr. John Petrim of Good Value Homes, Inc, was present to provide information in regard to the development of these three quad units in an area previously ,not developed by the original developer or Orrin Thompson. Ms. Debbie Tresidder of 4639 Penkwe Way was present and indicated that she had relied upon representations of Orrin Thompson as indicated in a drawing of RidgeCliffe Addition wherein the area proposed was designated as common area. Ms. Barbara Young was present and indicated her reliance upon the same representations and that the units provided a much different style as compared with the existing development. Voracek moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat, based upon the reliance of owners in the development upon representations of the previous developer, the adjacent owners and the City, that the area would be open area. All voted yea. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT MEETING At the suggestion of the chairperson, it was recommended that the September Joint Comprehensive Guide meeting be opened to developments to allow discussion of plans for various areas of the City not yet formalized. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion. All voted in favor. 7 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight PRELIMINARY PLAT/JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat for Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition --A public hearing was .held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Good Value Homes Inc. The Adivsory Planning Commission is recommending denial of the preliminary plat. There were a number of citizens present who stated that the marketing map used by.Orr'in Thompson Homes noted that there were no units proposed on the overall concept develop- ment plan and that this area was intended as open space. • For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report found on pages W4_4 through 130 . For additional information regarding the action that was taken by the. APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s),/3/ . 0.1 The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed subdivision. It is their recommendation that a cash dedication requirement be approved for the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition as presented. /23 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat (Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition) APPLICANT: Good Value Homes, Inc. LOCATION: Outlot B (Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Add.) EXISTING 20NING: NW; Sec 33R-3 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 26 August 1986 DATE OF REPORT: 12 August 1986 REPORTED BY: Planning a Engineering S APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval for the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. This plat consists of 3 four-plex buildings on Outlot B of the Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition. That plat was submitted by Orrin Thompson Homes and approved in 1984. No construction has taken place on Outlot B, located south of Cliff Road and west of Ridge Cliff Drive. CODE COMPLIANCE: The total number of units in the 4th and 5th Additions will increase from 56 to 68 units. The gross area for Outlot B is 5.1 acres. Twelve additional units give the Outlot an overall density of 7.01 units/acre, well within the 6-12 range permitted in R-3 districts. The lots are 10' larger than the building itself with the remaining area being designated as an outlot-common space. The buildings are serviced by private drives and 2 additional parking spaces per unit are provided in front of the garages. COMMENTS: The main reason buildings were not placed here originally is due to the poor soil. The developer will have to correct the soils to ensure proper drainage and building suitability. These 1056 S.F. (main level) buildings will be architecturally the same as others in the area.. The exterior will have a brick base with aluminum siding. An association for this 12 unit plat will be combined with that of the 4th Addition for better continuity. The association will maintain the grounds, remove trash on a single scheduled basis and provide snow removal. A detailed landscape plan will be a requirement of the final plat submission. The applicant will be providing an underground sprinkling system and the proposed landscaping will be similar to other units in the area. The landscape policy will require a miminum of .one tree per dwelling unit. AA / JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADD APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant's grading plan appears feasible and in accordance with City Codes. The grading will not significantly impact any existing drainage patterns and should not be a problem. UTILITIES: Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist within Penkwe Way and Ridge Cliffe Drive to provide service to this proposed development. Staff recommends that this development extend existing services from Block 2 and Block 3 of the 4th Addition to Block 2 of the 5th Addition. Similarly, services from Block 1 of the 4th Addition could be extended to a portion of Block 1 of the 5th Addition, and services from Block 5 of the 4th Addition could be extended to service a portion of Block 3 in the 5,th Addition. This would leave only Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3 of the 5th Addition requiring an additional service to be cut into Ridge Cliffe Drive. As long as the entireassociationwill remain the same, staff does not see any problem in extending existing services for . this proposed development. STREETS: This development is bordered by Ridge Cliffe Drive on the southeast and Penkwe Way along its north, west and southwesterly boundaries. Both streets are City residential streets built to their ultimate design sections. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition provided dedicating all necessary right-of-way and easements. Staff does not see any need for any additional easements for this development.. Outlot B of the Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition contains a drainage and utility easement over all of it. This drainage and utility easement will have to be either vacated oder the areas designated as the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition or completely vacated and replatted with the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. This vacation will have to occur prior to final plat approval. PERMITS: No permits are required because this development only proposes on extending services and not constructing any main lines. ASSESSMENTS': The assessment records indicate that the City has assessed all trunk area related assessments for this proposed development. /2.6 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADD APC - PAGE 3 CONDITIONS': 1. This development shall use existing services for sanitary sewer and water to the newly developed lots. The only new service that will be allowed will be to provide service to Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3. 2. The. vacation of the necessary drainage and utility easements over Outlot B for the proposed Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of the 5th Addition shall occur prior to final plat approval. 3. All costs associated with completing this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 4. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and the financial guarantee shall not be released until after 1 year from time of installation. 6. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission review and dedication requiements. • 0 ii - 0 E ri PRELIMINARY PLAT OF JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE FIFTH ADDITION E/61N . MI 14 13 �I cs ^ - ,.:� ____ •NL Mi SITE DAT/ . �-- Ri: fA655 MEA 511 ¢ K DENSITY E11ST 0 I _ • / / EENSITY .h T I wn/om EFFEDIST E CENLTY RKREFfI pL1T. &Y.5 t 61 TC intim. PRJRSD Y M 314" •Item) i l/lL1`I �Il E.15T ZON" R-5 iµ 9e� - VJ _ AOI�U ZOiIG R-5 a° i ,ur-awr n,LE AL DESCRIPTION a ° I • / I', .i{lil:a UIRDf a ..eMNY bl£ ROX FawrN wortxxr �FS I' i i ' yy�� 1111 .— /'' OWNER DEVELOPER BENNE Nn vu• dl 7W.550 �\yf 1 . •°l ° // SURVEYOR •.;• I sA mr ST EUsrls n a° ST NUL5511A6 RONEI M5 -SMB '"Iii ::xi.c+l �MATIN)lt M" S EIN FEET 0 0 :`°`-•'•.. RA .... ".. IN .., 13. 1 a 11 A 23 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ADDITIONS Development Plan (is' 2nd 31d 8 41h additions) P Y" W. AWN/ A4 7- d rI ADDITION�. Typleft LOT DrVILOPMENT Z.. .... SCALE: I' A 100' . q U, .... I .... ...... ... -0.2 . .... .. I PII,0n1 mu All IBM t. A. VilNbtN 1k WOCIMS, INC. -------------- A BAB LAND SURVEYORS 0 0 APC Minutes August 26, 1986 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. All trash must be kept in the individual garages until the day of pick up by one collector. 13. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the cul-de- sac island. 14. A financial guarantee for the landscaping ensuring proper installation and sizes shall not be released until one full year after completion. 15. That a homeowners association slial.l be established in accord with City staff approval. 16. The reduction in density to the City will not be transferable to other portions of the Planned Development. 17. A 50 foot buffer shall be maintained between the buildings and neighboring parcels. All voted in favor except Wilkins and Harrison who voted no. JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was the preliminary plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition by Good Value Homes„ Inc. consisting of 12 townhouse units on approximately 4 acres located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 33, south of Cliff Road and east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application. Mr. John Petrim of Good Value Homes, Inc. was present to prov-ide information in regard to the development of these three quad units in an area previously not developed by the original developer or Orrin Thompson. . Ms. Debbie Tresidder of 4639 Penkwe Way was present and indicated that she had relied upon representations of Orrin Thompson as indicated in a drawing of RidgeCliffe Addition wherein the area proposed was designated as common area. Ms. Barbara Young was present and indicated her reliance upon the same representations and that the units provided a much different style as compared with the existing development. Voracek moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat, based upon the reliance of owners in the development upon representations of the previous developer, the adjacent owners and the. City, that the area would be open area. All voted yea. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT MEETING At the suggestion of the chairperson, it was recommended that the September Joint Comprehensive Guide meeting be opened to developments to allow discussion of plans for various areas of the City not yet formalized. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion. All votedin favor. /.5/ 7 •. O Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contracts 86-21 & 86-22, Receive Bids/Award Contracts for Lighting in Parking Lot --The City has completed the preparation of specifications and the advertisement for bids to supply fixtures and poles and install, par -king lot light fixtures at three community parks. Those parks are Trapp Farm Park, Goat Hill and Rahn. For a list of the bidders, refer to page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON awarding of Contract 86-21 • $2,0,696.50 and 2) awarding of light poles and fixtures in • THIS ITEM: 1) Approve or deny the to Judd Electric in the amount of of Contract 86-23 for installation the amount of $19,200. /3v AWARD CONTRACT 86-22 & 86-23 Specifications and plans were prepared and an advertisement for bids to supply (86-22) and install (86-23) parking lot light fixtures at three (3) Community parks. Bids were received as follows: 86-22: Supplying fixtures/poles 1. Judd Electric $20,646.50 2. Northland Electric $20,880.00 3. J. H. Larsen Electric $24,708.35 The total of $39,846.50 is approximately $4,800 less than Staff estimate of $44,600.00. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Award Contract 86-22 to Judd Electric for supplying poles and fixtures for parking lot lighting, in the amount of $20,646.50 and award Contract 86-23 for installing light poles and fixtures, to Midland Electric in the amount of $19,200.00. Note: Staff had the project bid in two contracts: one for supplying materials, the other for installation. It was determined that bid amounts would be less utilizing separate bids. The primary savings being the competitive pricing of the poles and fixtures by suppliers, and elimination of typical "mark-ups" of material by installers. KV/bls /33 86-23: Install fixtures and electrical work 1. Midland Electric $19,200.00 2. Corrigan Electric $22,972.00 3. Ridgedale Electric $26,600.00 4. Berg Electric $26,715.00 5. Hilite Construction $31,372.00 6. Muska Electric $53,797.00 The total of $39,846.50 is approximately $4,800 less than Staff estimate of $44,600.00. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Award Contract 86-22 to Judd Electric for supplying poles and fixtures for parking lot lighting, in the amount of $20,646.50 and award Contract 86-23 for installing light poles and fixtures, to Midland Electric in the amount of $19,200.00. Note: Staff had the project bid in two contracts: one for supplying materials, the other for installation. It was determined that bid amounts would be less utilizing separate bids. The primary savings being the competitive pricing of the poles and fixtures by suppliers, and elimination of typical "mark-ups" of material by installers. KV/bls /33 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty A. Public Improvement Contracts (continued) Item 2. Contract 86-23, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) --Detailed plans and specifications have been completed for the installation of the extensive trunk storm sewer improvements in the vicinity of Holland Lake. These plans are being presented to the Council in consideration of authorizing the advertisement for bid opening to be held at 10:10 a.m. on Friday, October 17, 1986. The Consultant Engineer and Public Works Director will be available to review these plans in detail with the Council at the meeting on September 16. In order to insure that this trunk storm sewer system is available to handle next spring's runoff, it is necessary to initiate this construction.as quickly as possible. All easements required for this project are being acquired through negotiations -or initiation of condemnation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and specifications for Contract 86-23 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, October 17, 1986. ® Item 3. Contract 86-240 Receive Bids/Award Contract (Towerview Road and Highview Avenue) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday September 12, formal bids were received for the upgrading of Highview Avenue and Towerview Road to City specifications. Enclosed on page 5 is a tabu'lation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the estimates contained in the feasibility report for each of these projects. All bids will be checked for accuracy in their extensions and additions and a formal recomendation will be made by the Director of Public Works at the September 19 Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-24 (Towerview Road and Highview Avenue) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. /# • L] CONTRACTORS 1. Alexander Construction 2. McNamara Contracting 3. Bituminous Roadways Towerview 469 Highview 476 STREET $32,292.00 30,864.25 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----------- Feasibility Rept. Est. Bid Amount % Under Eng. Est. 7747d % Under Feas. Rpt. Est. ROAD ,No. /3,5 Our File No. 49396 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, Sept. 12, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID ALT $63,156.25 + $1,500.00 69,686.50 + 1,000.00 70,660.85 + 350.00 TOWERVIEW PROJ. 469 $32,000.00 42;580.00 32,292.00 —1.0% —24.2 HICIVIEW PROD. 476 $33,000.00 36,670.00 30,864.25 —6.5% —15.8% E Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One A. Public Improvement Contracts (continued) Item 4. Contract 86-25, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Burr Oaks Addition) --As explained urrder Item E of Consent, the developer's engineer had already prepared detailed plans and specifications which have since been modified to conform to the first phase development of the Burr Oak Addition. These plans have been reviewed by staff and are being presented to the Council for their review and approval in consideration of authorizing advertisements for a bid opening. The Public Works Director will be available to review.the plans with the Council at the September 16 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans for Contract 86-25 (Burr Oak Addition) and authorize the advertisement for bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, Octbber 17, 1986. l3� Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS B.' Private Improvement Contracts - Item 1. Project 85 -BB, Final Acceptance (R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition) --Project -85-BB provided for the installation of utilities to service the R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition at the intersection of Conserve Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. All construction has been completed, final inspection performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and a recommedation is being forwarded for final acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85 -BB (R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition) and accept for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Project 85 -RR, Final Acceptance (Rahn Ridge Addition), -- All construction has been completed providing 'for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Rahn Ridge Addition connecting Vienna Woods with the County Courthouse p facility. All construction has been completed, final inspection V performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and a redommendation is being forwarded for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85 -RR (Rahn Ridge Addition) and accept improvements for perpetual City maintenance. 131 • 41 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page 'Thirty -Three COMPARABLE WORTH UPDATE C. Comparable Worth Update --The City has received the final results for the comparable worth point values for each position that is classified in the City of Eagan. The Personnel Committee met on Tuesday, September 9, 1986, and reviewed the point values as received and is recommending a final consideration and action by the City Council. A copy of this list is in each packet without page number. For additional information and a review of the comparable worth update regarding a review to date by the Personnel Committee, refer to pages�through�. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt the list of point values for each position as classified in the City. The Personnel Committee is proceeding with their review of a pay equity program that will allow the City to adopt a comparable worth pay plan that satisfied the intent of comparable worth legislation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve comparable worth point values as established by Data study results and review and consideration by Committee. /3 or deny the the Control the Personnel MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: COMPARABLE WORTH UPDATE Earlier this summer, the Personnel Committee of the City Council met to inspect the preliminary position hierarchy point totals for all positions in the City of Eagan. These point totals were the result of the Control Data Business Advisors comparable worth study as commissioned by the MAMA group. It was the recommendation of Control Data that cities perform a final review of all Time Spent Profiles (TSP's) in order to make the study results as accurate as possible. As you recall, the TSP for each position lists the tasks performed in that position and the • percent of time spent on each task. No values are included. As the members of the Personnel Committee reviewed the preliminary results, they were concerned about and pointed out possible inconsistencies in Eagan's results. They then requested that all TSP's receive one more review in order to insure as much accuracy as possible. Therefore, all department heads received the TSP's for all positions within their departments. They and the supervisors in their departments were requested to thoroughly examine each TSP and revise if necessary. A review was also performed by Administrative Assistant Duffy. The TSP's were reviewed by considering only if the tasks listed and the percent of time spent on those tasks were correct. No task values were released so values were not considered. • '' Those TSP's which were revised were returned to Control Data for processing in late July. The City received the revised printouts and the revised position hierarchy in early September. The hierarchy was presented to the Personnel Committee for thier review at a meeting held Tuesday, September 9. After review and discussion, it was their recommendation that the position hierarchy be presented to the City Council at the regular September 16, 1986 meeting for consideration of approval of its release to all employees. Enclosed without a page number please find a copy of the point hierarchy. Action will be needed to approve or deny release of the hierarchy to employees. If the Council does approve the release, department meetings would be held Wednesday, September 17, and all employees would receive the information from thier department heads, hopefully at the same time. An all -employee meeting would then be scheduled approximately a week later in order to answer any questions the employees might have. The week's delay would allow any initial emotional reactions time to die down. Al/ Employees will have the right to appeal their positions' results, but only under certain circumstances. Employees cannot appeal just because they feel that the point total is not high enough. They can, however, appeal on the basis that either the tasks or the percents of time listed in their TSP's are incorrect. They must refer to specific tasks and percents and back up their position with facts. The next steps in the comparable worth process will be to develop salary ranges, a method for placing individual employees on the ranges, and a time schedule for implementation. The Personnel Committee will be studying these issues in great detail in future meetings. TLH/HND MR • ti40 . MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE CHANNEL 9 NEWS The City Administrator was taped on Wednesday, September 10 for a news item on Eagan's growth that will be aired on the 9':00 news tonight on Channel 9. Channel 9 news is typically an hour in length with world news from 9-9:30 and local news the last half hour. • DEER HUNTING REQUEST FOR KENNELLY PROPERTY Enclosed on pages LIw through /- are copies of a letter from Jon Yanta and a response from the Department of Natural Resources regarding deerhunting with firearms by Jon Yanta on the Kennelly property. It was the City Council's desire in early August to not allow any special firearm deerhun,ts unless the property is contiguous with land that is included in the DNR hunt and further than the hunt would be coordinated by that state agency. Since the Yanta correspondence and response by DNR, Mr. Yanta has told both DNR and the City that he has decided to bow and arrow hunt on the Kennelly property which gives him several weekends to shoot his deer limits. NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK The City Council has been invited to attend a special disaster demonstration on Saturday, September 27 at the Rainbow Food Store. Please refer to the attached letter found on page 11.. HUMANE SOCIETY Enclosed on pages and are two (2) letters from residents addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding Minnesota Valley Humane Society. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY FOR THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Enclosed on page is a letter from Bruce Medvec informing the City that the Lea ue of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has agreed to delete from its exclusion endors.,ement for the "professional engineers". All NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE The National League of Cities Conference will be held at San Antonio, Texas on November 29 - December 3. If any member of the City Council is interested in attending, please let this office know soon so arrangements can be made for hotel and airplane reservations. The City Administrator has more information on the conference if any Councilmember is interested. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Enclosed without page number is an informational packet that was prepared by staff and the Economic Development Commission for tax increment financing. This packet of information provides all the documentation and requirements that were 'set for by the Economic Development Commission and incorporates data that was discussed and learned at the seminar in June. It is recommended that City Council review the TIF packet and at a future meeting this item will be placed on the agenda for the final review and consideration. With the exception of housing, tax increment financing guidelines were tightened significantly with the new tax law. In order to provide tax increment financing the City must incorporate a m-inimum of a 100 acres as the development district. FIRE TRAINING FACILITY The City of Burnsville is considering the construction of a fire training facility within their community. Since a fire training facility could serve more than one community, the cities of Apple Valley, Eagan, Lakevill and Savage have been contacted to determine whether there is interest on the part of those cities. Acting Fire Chief Schindeldecker and the City Administrator attended the meeting and will be briefing the City Council more on the cost and purpose of the fire training facility in the near future. LETTER TO THE EDITOR REGARDING HUMANE SOCIETY Enclosed is a copy of information that was submitted to "Eagan City Officials" by Jenice Keisling of Burnsville. That informa- tion is enclosed on pages /56 through ►52 . AIRPORT NOISE An article entitled "Keeping the Peace" was sent to all cities from Noise. The article is brief and informative and happens to pertain to Northwest Orients ambition to comply with the Stage 3 requirements by adding additional 57s to their fleet of aircraft. A copy is enclosed on page . Also enclosed on page IJK is a letter from Jeff Hamiel in response to the joint resolution submitted by the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights. This response is positive and encouraging. /�v . .. RECREATION DEPARTMENT INTERN The Director of Parks and Recreation was contacted by the University of Minnesota and asked if the City would consider a 3 month internship on a part-time basis to satisfy some classroom objectives. An intern, Julie Lencowski, will start a nonpaid internship on September 15. She will assist where she can, but generally looking over everyone's shoulder, trying to learn more about recreation and how the City functions. 'OU RESPONSE FROM NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA OF'IJ=NDRE Al Enclosed on page is a thank you to the Mayor and City Council. HRA STATUS REPORT ® Enclosed on pages /&"/0 is the most recent status report as submitted by the HRA. /s/ Thomas Hedges City Administrator' /�3 July 28, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: I am writing in regards to Joe Kennelly's land that is adjacent to the Minnesota State Park,.north of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks in Eagan. Recently, I spoke with John Parker of the Department of Natural Resources about the two -weekend slug hunt in the Minnesota State Park. In our conversation, John and I discussed the advantages of the Eagan City Council in creating a waiver that adheres to allowing our party to participate in the hunt on Joe Kennelly's land. Our party, which consists of my -two brothers and me, have hunted (bow, shotgun) for the past ten years on the land and feel that through our responsible past reputation that we should be con- sidered as a ,serious participant in this hunt. Mr. Parker noted that all deer taken from Kennelly's land would be added to the count of the deer harvested on the two -weekend hunt. In many ways this proposal will be beneficial to the City of Eagan, in particular, it will save costly efforts of sharp shooters that may be needed if the harvest is not productive. ®' Joe Kennelly and I would like to be present during the next city meeting! Please give me a call and update me on when the proceed- ings will take place. Thank you. Sincerely, 96m �.1NL11 Jon Yanta 2116 Emerald Lane Eagan, MN 55122 924-4616 (W) 454-1356 (H) jsa659 A I��I�S�TATE OF DEPARTMENT PHONENO.445-9393 Area Wildlife Manager 223 Holmes Street Shakopee, PIN 55379 Tom Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Know Road Eagan, NN 55122 OF NATURAL RESOURCES 9/5/86 FILE Subject: Firearms Deer Hunting by John Yanta party on Kennealy Property As you know we have both been discussing this issue with Lir. Yanta for the past month. I have investigated the possiblility of including Mr. Kennealy's property in the controlled hunt zone. This would not work out for several reasons. Hunting could only be done during the special season; this would preclude bow hunting by Lir.. Yanta. Hunting could only be done by hunters selected in the special hunt lottery; this might preclude Mr. Yanta from hunting. The end result could be that we included the land in the special hunt but actually reduced the amount of hunting and deer removal. I recommend that the Cit issue three permits for the property (I've been told that it is 60 acres. This would be about 1 hunter per 20 acres or approximately our special hunt density. .The city -should require the hunters to attend the special hunt orientation and to obey all regulations of the special hunt. Since the hunt is being held during the "bucks only" season, the hunters would be allowed to take only bucks. Mr. Yanta understands this. Mr. Yanta's party would be allowed to deer hunt with bow and arrow for the entire remainder of the season, city ordinances permitting. I hope you can permit this arrangement. we need to get as much hunting pressure in this area as possible to -avoid the possibility of sharpshooting. ® Hunters in this area will increase the effectiveness of the special hunt on state land by keeping the deer moving and by reducing the amount of "refuge". Let me know if I can help by letter or phone; I cannot justify appearing before the City Council for this number of hunters. Thanks for your help. a Wildlife Manager I¢5 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER E0 J September 2, 1986 Honorable Bea Blomquist,- Mayor City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mrs. Blomquist and City Council Members: DIVINE REDEEMER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 724 Nineteenth Avenue North South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 (612)450-4500 I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to attend a special disaster demonstration involving your Police and Fire departments, along with our para- medics, in celebrating National Emergency Medical Services Week. Come and see your first responders at work! • Place: Rainbow Foods, Eagan When: Saturday, September 27, 1986 Time: 12 noon to 3 p.m. Since y, O Drew Haynes Administrator jl An American Healthcare Management Hospital s'J;a^.ER 86' Dear Sir; I :rant you to know that as a tax -payer and concerned citizen of this County I think it is inexcusable that we do not have an animal shelter! The Minnesota. Valley Humane Societe of Dakota County (,,iViS) has been strur�.�lin- for years to build a shelter and hundreds of people like .myself support their efforts. iihy haven't you noticed?.? ® This "all when the MV?dS approaches you for support I hope you will also recognize the -rea.t need we have in this County and Help us build the shelter re neer'. • Thankyou. Respectfully, �jLw wa�u� Grp IV/ SUMMER 86' Dear Sir; I want you to know that as a tax -payer and concerned citizen of this County I think it is inexcusable that we do not have an animal shelter! The Minnesota Valley Humane Society of Dakota County (WHS) has been struggling for years to build a shelter and hundreds of people like myself support their efforts. Why -haven't you noticed.?? This Fall when the MVHS approaches you for support I hope you will also recognize the great need we have in this County and help us build the shelter we need. Thankyou. Res ct"_1 , �J� J X4' , p yr -,an % NN A G Cr tl•.t � ' O First Insurance ,,I) Twin Cities First Insurance Twin Cities 8000 West 78th Street Suite 400 Edina, Minnesota 55435 612 8234600 September 9, 1986 Mr. Gene Vanoverbeke Finance Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 • RE: Staff Engineer's Professional Liability Dear Gene: I am pleased to inform you that the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has agreed to delete from its exclusion endorsement "professional engineers". The new endorsement will continue to exclude attorney's, doctors, nurses, and architects. This is significant in that the Comprehensive General Liability policy will now include coverage for your staff professional engineer. With this in mind, the entire subject of design errors and omissions, gray areas of coverage and the general reluctance of the City to allow your professional engineers to sign off on plans and blueprints should now be resolved. • I wish to remind the City that your professional engineering staff is protected to the amount of only $600,000. This limit is identical to the Minnesota Statute and to the policy the City of Eagan purchased on July 1, 1986. If you should have any further comments or questions, please feel free to call on me at any time. _ Per re ards uce A. Medvec Senior Account Executive BAM:las cc: Mr. Tom Colbert Professional Engineer �i/ Cl O j.., September 4, 1986 To The Editor: It really brightened my morning to read the article about Harrieth Champine and her animal welfare work (Variety 8/18). The world needs more people like her. Then I got further into the paper and read'the article criticizing the Eagan pound (Community, 8/Z8). and my bright mood was replaced by frustration and disappointment. The article about Mrs. Champine praises her for all the good she's done for the Humane Society and animals of Hennepin County, which I agree with. But the animals of Eagan (Dakota County) also need help, more, in fact, because Dakota County is the only.County in the seven -county metro area without an animal shelter! The article about the Eagan pound states that the city is 'searching' for a new location for stray animals, but the Minnesota Valley Humane Society of Dakota County has been unsuccessful in its requests for support for a County shelter. Where, then, could the city of Eagan be conducting this search? What do the people on Blue Jay Way propose be done with all the stray animals in our area? Stray animals which are, by the way, results of uninformed or irresponsible people! Eagan (pop 35,311) and Dakota County are growing very fast, and out of this Targe population, depressingly few (less than 200) are supporters of the Humane Society. Our neighboring counties are tired of taking care of our • animals problems; someday a shelter will have to be built. I can't believe the residents of Dakota County are that uncaring. Can't we pool together now and support a Humane Society shelter for Dakota County? Jenice Keisling Burnsville /�61 %javOMMUM LY Dakota/ Scott zone pages inside dog days, evoke howls to close Eagan pound By Rob Hotakalee Staff Writer N Folks who moved `%"innesota's lastest, growing city In search of the quiet suburban life style now say they're suffering physical and emo- tional distress as the dog days of summer surrender to fall. They're blaming It on the dogs Legend hat'It that dogs are prone to spells of madness and that people tend to become listless as they cope with hol, sticky weather. Ancient Greeks, Romans and Egyptians blamed the steamy weather on Siri- us, the dog star that rises with the sun in late summer. Modern-day Eaganites blame their misery on the howls, barks and whines coming from a kennel tucked between the condominiums and apartments that serve as a statement of the city's progress. They want the city's animal pound closed — now. Seventy-one people on Blue Jay Way have petitioned the cltg to revoke a kennel license granted to Bill and Kim Abel, who have operated the city's animal pound at their "farm" on 3506 S. Lexington Av. since 1078. and to turn up the volume on her television set. "It's especially bad for myself and the ladyupstalrs," she said. "They're right out our patio." Wittles and her neighbors claim the Abels are violating a city ordinance and that the dogs are disturbing the peace by "barking, howling, whining and making other loud noises at all hours of the day and night." A public hearing before the Eagan City Council to consider revoking the kennel license Is set for Oct. 21, said Tom Hedges, Eagan city administra- tor. Meanwhile, he said; the city Is escalating Its search for a new loca- tion for stray animals picked up In .the.city limits.. "We'll get shut down — that's for sure," said Bill Abel. "I kind of re- sent it, but that's progress. What are you going to do about It?" The pound and kennel, known as Silver Emblem Kennels, can hold 19 animals and has been used to house dogs, cats, rabbits, goats and other animals. The Abels are paid $3.50 per day for each animal taken to the pound by city officers. The city's progress already has chased away the deer, raccoons and "They bark all night. Usually one':. pheasants that played on the Abels', starts, then they all gang In," said lIV"crp tract. only,eight years ago. Flora W Ittles, who moved. intp: here And since motkg to the agricultural - condominium at 3575 Blue Jay Way' vly toned land In 1978, the Abets have five months ago. watched the awby swamp being overtaken by thi- C01101hlaiulp Her response to the noisy dogs is to dwellers. keep her doors end windows shYS "That used to be out In the O n - docks three or four years ago," said Eagan Police Chief Jay Berthe. "Our country setting is leaving us quick. out here.... These are the first com- plaints we've had. This Is a whole new experience for us." But such Issues are to be expected for a city that continues to outpace all others in Minnesota in population growth. Planners estimated the city's popula- tion at 35,311 as of April 1, up by 14,611 since 1980, said Pat O'Connell, planning assistant with the Metropol- itan Council. The agency analyzes population data for the seven -county metropolitan region. Among all Minnesota cities with pop- ulations of at least 10,000, Eagan and Eden Prairie rated as the fastest growing, based on 1984 figures, ac- cording to a spokeswoman for the state demographer's office. Responding to growing citizen com- plaints, police warned the Abels to quiet their dogs or face a possible citation. Berthe said the police de- partment will not make an arrest, but that a woman has threatened to make a citizen's arrest if the dogs continue to disturb peace in the neighborhood. —r Thursday August 28/1986 Staff Photo by Art Hager Flora Witlles stood outside her condominium and looked toward the The Abels said theyhave offered to. Eagan animal pound. "They bark all night," she said. move . th_e kennel for $50,00O..City officials said they have; talkg9,to-.:That',y:an:{{vgnue for working some - local veterinarians in Eagan. to see, : �Ihin� out ll�Ye," said Berthe, whether they will take to 1h,4'al'ray,.,'<'c,,," animals. In the 'meantime, any ,�bkes about ¢ going tq. the'dogs won't draw "A couple of them are Interested. Iy laughs. "When people call us, we take every thing seriously," said Berthe. "It', one of those things that are bugging some people. We're not laughing about it, that's for sure." A ' Pr r. ,.. _�-++r.•�r�JR"`t� 1 - '^�j'y �r'i.-i�Jr [> �_ r�t �-��• "�B 'Sr..+�. _.- �`� �-+�•Tfl"s �p a �'fr � �ez-i lti.�r 'r. >`.. . KEEPING THE PEACE t was in 1960 that Northwest Orient entered the jet age by purchasing a number of McDon- nell Douglas DC -8C aircraft. Just prior to introducing the new high-speed plane, the airline em- barked on a program of extensive re- search and experimentation to de- termine the best method of operation for the DC -8C. Based on the researchers' findings, Northwest Orient developed and instituted the aviation industry's first noise abate- ment procedures for high-speed commercial aircraft. The researchers found that adher- ence to certain procedures would yield both quieter and more fuel effi- cient flights, reducing the intensity of noise that people on the ground heard as well as the duration of the noisier periods. The procedures in- cluded a slightly steeper climb just after takeoff, so that most of the audi- ble decibels were concentrated over the airport itself; flaps retracted at 1,Ooo feet of altitude, to decrease the drag and reduce the engine thrust necessary to launch the plane; usage of reduced power until the plane reached 3.000 feet; and the usage of climb power only after the plane was far above or array from congested residential areas. These same steps arc reversed to reduce noise upon landing- The methods have been, of course, refined over time, along By 1990, 60 percent of Nortburst Orient's capacity will be carried on Stage li'i aircraft such as 757s, among the quietest planes in the soy with technological developments. Soon after Northwest Orient im- plemented the noise abatement pro- gram, other airlines followed suit, and Northwest Orient has twice been recognized by the National Or- ganization to Insure a Sound Con- trolled Environment (N.O.I.S.E.) and has received other awards for its work toward noise abatement pro- grams. Studies at communities close to airports throughout the United States name the airline as the one whose pilots most consistently ad- here to these procedures, stressed in Northwest Orient pilot training. Late in the 1960s, jet engine modi- fications commonly termed "hush kits" became available. Although they were expensive to install— S250,000 per plane—Northwest Orient added them to its early model 727s and 747s, known as Stage I planes, the aircraft that generate the highest decibel levels. The airline spent S10 million to refit the Stage I aircraft in its fleet. The quietest, newest aircraft fall into the category of Stage III. North- west Orient has always bought the most technologically advanced air- planes available and sold off its older models while they still have residual value. The oldest plane in the North- west fleet is a 727, and the airline has in its fleet one of the largest percent- ages of Stage 111 aircraft in the nation. (It also has one of the largest per- centages of wide-body aircraft in its fleet, meaning that the airline can carry more passengers per flight, re- ducing the number of flights it must schedule and, therefore, the amount of noise it generates. ) Today, Northwest Orient has out- - standing orders for 33 more Stage Ill aircraft. By 1990, 60 percent of the airline's capacity will be carried on aircraft of this kind, the quietest com- mercial planes available. Fleet mod- ernization is the single most effective measure an airline can take to con. trol noise levels over the communi- ties it serves, and it is a step to which Northwest Orient is most committed. The airline has done and will con. tinue to do all it can to control the noise it generates over the communi- ties it serves. This is only one of the reasons why many communities near the airports Northwest Orient serves consider it a "good neighbor." The 16,500 people who work for Northwest Orient all live and work in communities served by the carrier. And the many passengers who have flown on Northwest Orient since its beginnings in 1926 are members of communities around the world. The Northwest Orient commitment to those communities is to continue to employ the best technology, experi- ence, and training. /53 a pftt • T �C� mwobpobs 0 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. O. BOX 11700 TWIN CITY AIRPORT MINNESOTA 55111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (812) 728.1892 September 8, 1986 The Honorable Bea Blomquist Mayor City of Eagan Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Mayor Blomquist: The Metropolitan Airports Commission is in receipt of your Joint Resolution 86-62 from the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights. As you know, the MAC has been conducting an aircraft departure survey in your coamunity for the last two months. The results of that survey clearly indicate that a tightening up of procedures is in order. In addition, the staff of the MPC is looking at ways to improve the use of the Corridor and guarantee stricter compliance with procedure. Your community has been very responsible in its planning efforts by carefully developing the Corridor and it is our responsibility to continue to work toward optimum use of the Corridor as originally intended. I appreciate your forwarding this resolution and I assure you that it will be given the Commission's prompt attention. Si ce e y, Jeffrey W. Hamiel Executive Director JWH:gm cc: Robert G. Lockwood Mayor, Mendota Heights Ifv OFFICE LOCATION -6040 281h AVE. SO. -WEST TERMINAL AREA -MINNEAPOLIS -SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT September 3,1986 TO: Mayor Bloomquist and Council Members cc: Tom Colbert Tom Hedges Jay Berthe • The 45 households and myself would like to send our sincere thanks for your immediate attention to our stop sign issue. It is comforting to know that the city does care. Sincerely, aanne O'Keefe 155 DAKOTA COUNTY pwNneehl H A Serving People and Communities M E M O R A N D U M DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 SEF`5 YV•-•. TO:. HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred Joy, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department FROM: Mark Ulfers, Executive Director 1l A� SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMU�VELOPMENT DATE:, September 4, 1986 Enclosed are the August Status Reports for all the Assisted Housing Programs in Dakota County and the Community Development Programs administered by the Dakota County HRA. If you would like additional information on any of the programs, please feel free to call me. Enclosure "AN' vnllnl nDDnDTI1K11TV CIIDInVCD'• Brief description of assisted housing programs: 1. Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti- lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits. 2. Moderate Rehab: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners of rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner, in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. 3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy Tor construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low 'and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve- lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects for senior citizens. 4. Low Rent Housing: The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) owns and manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program. These housing units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house- holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for utilities) for rent. 5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer available. 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc- tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no lon,ger available. ASSISTED HOUSING REPORT - AUGUST, 1986 *South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 and Low Rent Housing Program. I I SECTION 8 1 MODERATE I SECTION 8 NEW I LOW RENT 1235 HOME 1 236 RENTAL I CURRENT I I EXISTING I REHAB I CONSTRUCTION I HOUSING I FAMIL I FAMILY I TOTALS GRANDI COMMUNITIES -------------- I ELD I ---- FAMILY ------ TOTAL] -- I ELD ----- FAMILY --- TOTALI ELD FAMILY TOTALI ELD FAMILY TOTALI TOTAL I TOTAL I ELD FAMILY TOTALI APPLE VALLEY 1 11 42 53 1 0 0 ----I----- 0 1 0 - -----I 56 56 1 ---------------- 0 43 I - 43 1 ----- - 0 I ------------ 1 0 I ------------------ 1 11 141 I 152 1 -------------I BURNSVILLE --I------------------- ----------1-=--------- 1 54 101 155 1 0 0 I---------- 0 1 0 87 I 87 10 ---------------I 56 -------I 56 1 0 --------1---------------- 180 I 54 424 I 478 I --- - EAGAN ----- 1 30 I--------I---------1-----------I----------I---- 159 189 1 0 --- 0 --1----------I------------I-------I 0 1 0 33 33 1 0 17 17 1 0 - ----- 1 144 I ----------------I 1 30 353 383 1 FARMINGTON --- -- 1 20 I -- 51 ------ 71 1 I 0 ------- 0 0 1 -I----------------I 75 0 75 1 0 2 2 1 --I 4 --- -------- 1 0 I-- -- 1 95 ---- 57 I 152 1 HASTINGS ------------I-------------I-----------I------------I=--------- 1 54 146 200 1 4 14 18 1 109 0 109 1 ------- 0 --- 10 --- I ---- 10 1 ----- 0 I -------- I 1 0 1 --------------- 167 170 I 337 1 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS ---------- 1 26 I---------I-------=------I----------I----------------I---- 182 208 1 0 0 0 1 0 40 40 1 0 6 --I---------I 6 1 31 ------------ I-- 1 202 1 -------- 26 - 461 ----- I 487 1 LAKEVILLE 1 13 43 56 1 0' 0 0 1 24 0 24 1 0 11 11 1 ---I-----------I------------------I 2 1 0 1 37 56 93 1 ----- ---- LILYDALE I -- 1 0 I 0 --- I---=--------- 0 1 0 0 I --------I 0 1 0 0 ------------ 0 1 0 6 I --------- 0 1 0 I ------------I 1 0 1 ----------------- 0 0 I 0 1 �p MENDOTA ---- - ------- 1 2 -I--------I 1 I-----=-I-----------I-------- 3 1 0 ------- 0 .0 1 I`----- 0 0 ---1---------1-------I-------1--------------I 01 0 0 I ---- 0 1 --- 0 I ----------- I 1 0 1 ---- ------ 2 1 - I 3 1 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 0 8 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 12 12 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 13 13 1 ---=-----_-I-` ROSEMOUNT ------ 1 10 I 30 -I----------1----------I--------------I- 40 1 0 0 0 1 39 28 67 1 0 30 30 1 --------I--------- 2 --I 1 0 1 ------- 49 ---- 90 ----- I 139 1 ------- - SOUTH ST. PAUL + - 1 32, ------ 135 I 167 1 ----------1--- 0 0 0 1 0 -------I 44 ----------------- 44 1 300 0 I ----- 300 1 2 I -------I 1 0 1 ------ 332 -- 181 - 513 1 ------- -I SUNFISH LAKE ---I-------------I------- --------- 1 0 1 I 1 1 0 0 --------- 0 1 0 0 ----1-------------- 0 1 0 0 I - 0 1 ------ - 0 I ------- --I 1 0 1 --------- 0 ------- 1 I 1 1 ------ WEST ST. PAUL 1 182 I---- 154 336 1 0 ---I-------------I--------------- 6 6 1 0 0 0 1 80 7 I------I---- 87 1 0 --I-----------------I 1 0 1 262 167 429 1 I -- OTHER - 1 1 I------- 6 1 71 I 0 ------------I----------1------------ -----I---- 0 0 1 0 --- -----I-- 0 01 ---------I-------I-- 0 0 0 1 I `--------- 0 - ---I--- 1 0 1 I ---------I ----------I 0 -- ------- 6 ------- 01 I TOTALS --------- I 1 435 I I I --- 1051 ------ I 1486 1 I I I 4 ------- 21 I 25 1 I I I ---- 247 300 ------- I 547 1 I I I 380 ---------- 182 I 562 1 I I I -------- 41 I I I I I 1 526 1 I I ----------- 1066 ----------------- 2121 I 3187 1 I I I *South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 and Low Rent Housing Program. Brief description of Community Development Programs: Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low- income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high heating costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising utility bills. 2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State program as a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners (adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is charged depending on the applicant's income. 3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income homeowners adjusted gross income under,$7,000 annually) for rehabilitation items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and accessibility of the home. These are deferred loans and are available to households with adjusted gross- incomes under $7,000 annually. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given to eligible low and moderate income homeowners for energy, items. The eligible homeowners are referred from Northern States Power Company. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc- tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas. � ', (^ ).- Z't�' �_� n��'�41i'��`•N�'.�..��.° :.� �"•_ M_ t,ye4�Y"?_r •n�j�� f_'D"*'fi.5". p ' �..- .. REPORT MAY 1976-MGUST 1986 DAKOTA COI1(f1' HRA COMMRNTY DEVELOPMENT HEATHERIZATION NHEA HOME IMPROV LOAN MHFA HOME REHAB LOAN MHFA HOME ENERGY LOAN RENTAL REHAB LOAN COBS REHAB LOAN COBS REHAB LOAN - MH, MHFA SOLAR BANK LOAN 312 LOANS COMMUNITIES ELD FPM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM. TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL L.FAM S.FAM COMM ELD TOTAL APPLE VALLEY 1 1 74 1 75 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 1 6 B 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 B I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 BURNSVILLE 17 1 137 1 154 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 B 1 4 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 B I 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 6 1 0 I B I 0 CANNON FALLS 2 1 2 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 B 1 B 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 I 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 CASTLE ROCK 0 1 4 1 4 B 1 0 I I I I B I 1 I l 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 B I 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 EAGAR 5 1 56 1 61 0 1 1 1 5 1 6 3 I 1 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 1 6 1 B 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 I 1 1 2 1 I__ 4 01 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 01 0 0 1 ----- 1 ----- 0 1 0 1 0 1 I_____ 0 ---- FARMINGTON —I—I— 24 1 118 1 142 —1--I--I— B 1 2 1 7 1 9 --1—I-1___ 2 1 1 1 4 1 7 ___1 ---- 2 1 1 1 1 ---- 1--- 13 1 15 ---- I—_1 0 1 0 1 ---- I__. 0 1 0 ____ I___ I 7 1 1 1 --- 4 1 12 ___1____1__1_____ 0 1 0 1 0 1 _____1____1__1___ 0 _____ ----- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 _____; I—__I C 1 ---- ;_—I 2 1 ----- 1 I --- I____ 1 HASTINGS 48 1 134 1 182 5 1 6 1 26 1 37 21 1 4 1 II 1 36 1 1 2 1 4 1 7 4 1 1 1 5 1 10 13 1 7 1 18 1 38 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 4 1 1 3 1 C 1 2 1 4 HAMPTON 5 1 11 1 16 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 3 1 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 B I 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 B I 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 ____I__1—_p____ 0 I 0 I 0 ____I_____ 0 I 2 1 I_____ 0 1 I_____ 0 _____1____1____1_.__1._ 2 1 2: 0 1 2 1 ^ `. INVER GROVE _I___I— 23 1 110 1 133 _I__1___I___ 3 1 4 1 10 1 17 __I___I___I_____ 4 1 2 1 15 1 21 ____I___I____1____ 0 1 0 1 7 1 7 ___1____ 0 1 I_____ 0 1 I_____ 0 1 0 ____1___1___1__ 1 1 4 1 B 1 13 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 LAKEVILLE 16 1 90 1 106 0 1 B I 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 6 1 ___I___I___1___ B 1 4 1 4 0 1 __1____1____1_____ 0 1 ----- 0 1 0 ----- _____I ____; 4 1 0 1 _____ 1_____I ___I—_ 2 1 ____;_ 6 ____I___;____ 0 1 _—I___1___I____- 0 1 1____ 0 1 _____; 0 ----- 0 1 1____1____;___- 0 1 0 1 2 _____ 0 1 I_____1___; 0 I O I 0 1 ____1_____ C LILYDALE 0 1 0 1 0 — I 0 1 — I 0 1 — I B I — B —I—I-1— 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 I 0 MENDOTA 21 21 4 21 01 01 2 21 01 01 2 01 01 01 I____ 0 01 01 BI 0 11 01 ____1_____1__1____ BI 1 01 ___; 01 ___I____;___-_ 61 0 ----- CI 1 ----- CI 1 ----- 01 1----- 2 ____;----- C: II 1 ----- CI ; 11 ----- ;____. 2 ____— MENDOTA HEIGHTS —;—I— IB 1 It 1 21 _—_1___1___1-- B I 1 1 3 1 4 --I—I—I—_ 3 1 0 1 2 1 5 ___1 ----- 1 1 I ----- 0 1 5 1 6 __I__-1____1—_ 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 ___ 2 1 1 1 ____;___1—__I___ I I 4 0 1 ____ 1____;____ 0 1 0 I I_____ 0 _ 2 1 --- ;___ 0 1 I_____;_____ 2 1 0 ----- 2 1 ;_____; C I ----- C 1 ;_____;_____ 2 1 0 MIESVILLE I I 1 1 2 0 1 B I 0 I 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 B I 0 1 I 0 1 I--- 0 --I 0 1 —I__1—_1---- --- 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 __— 1 ----- I 0 1 ----- I--- B 0 1 __1_I—_1----- 0 1 B I B _____;____I____ 0 1 0 1 0 1 1____ B ____I_____ 0 1 2 1 1_____ 0 I I_____;____ 0 I 2 ____ NORTHFIELD —I-1— 5 1 It I 16 _—I--I—_I— 0 1 0 1 3 1 3 —_I-1 0 1 0 1 --- I--- 0 1 0 ---- 1 ---- 0 I ---- B I 1 I 1 0 I B I 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 I__I 0 1 0 1 1----- 0 _____ 0 1 1_____I____;____ 2 1 0 1 0 ___ 0 1 1 ---- 0 1 ;----- C 1 1 0. 1 ----- ;...__ C RAVENNA 01 01 B --- 1—I 01 BI --- ;— 01 0 — I 01 — I BI — I 01 — 0 --1_-1 01 --- 01 1--- II 1 —I__;_1__ 21 01 BI B --- ---- ; 01 BI ___I --- 1 --- I--- 01 --- I_— 0 --- 01 ___I____ ---- BI 1____I__ BI 0 ___;___1_____ 21 21 CI I_____ 0 ----- 01 ;---- CI ;----- 01 ;_____; CI 2 RANDDLPH 2 1 9 1 11 —I—I—I-- B I 1 I I I 2 —1—I—I—_ 0 I 0 I B 1 B _—I___1_-1___ 0 1 1 1 11 2 _—_1—_I_I__ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 I 0 1 B 1 0 1 C 0 1 0 1 2 I C 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 1 2 ROSEMOINT 9 1 66 1 77 B I 1 1 7 1 B 6 1 0 1 0 1 6 0 I 0 1 19 1 19 0 1 ;—_I__1__ 6 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ---I ----- 3 1 4 0 1 ___I___1____;____ 0 1 0 1 0 _____I____p____ 0 1 0 1 0 1 I—_ C ----- 0 I ;----- 11 ;----- 0 1 I_____ 2 1 I___ 1 SOUTH ST. PAUL 03 1 207 1 296 B I 0 1 B 1 0 B I B I 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 --- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 I 2 ----- 0 1 ;----- 0 1 I_____ 0 1 1____ 0 ----- 0 1 I ----- 2 I ;_____; 0 I 0 1 ___ SUNFISH LAKE —I—;— 0 1 0 1 B —_1___I__I_—_ 0 1 0 I B I 0 __I_I—__1___ B I 0 1 2: 0 ____I____1_____;___ 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 ___1____I____;_____ 0 1 6 1 0 1 ----- 0 _____I____;___ 0 1 0 1 _____I___1___I__ p__ 0 1 0 0 1 ___1___1___1__._ ---- 0 1 ----- 0 1 0 ----- 2 1 1____I 0 1 ----- 0 1 I----- 2 _____I_____ C 1 C 1 1_____I_____ 2 1 2 1 1_____ 0 __-- VERMILLION —I-1— 1 1 3 1 4 —_1__1___1___ 0 1 0 1 0 1 B __I B I -1___I____ 0 1 0 1 0 ____1_____1_____1___ 0 1 0 1 B 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 _____I----- I----- 8 1 I___ 0 0 1 ____ I ---- 0 1 ;---- 2 1 I____ 9 _____1____I 0 1 0 1 0 1 ____;____ 0 _____I 2 1 _____ 0 I' I_____;_____;_____ 2 1 0 1 0 HEST ST.PAD. —I-- --- 53 1 81 1 134 ___I__I___I--- 20 I 6 1 32 1 58 _-1_I—_1____ 14 1 6 1 15 1 35 _—I_—;.__1__._ 5 1 0 1 1 1 6 ____1___I___p__ 19 1 0 1 13 1 32 56 I 15 1 I I 54 1 I 125 0 1 I 0 1 I 0 1 I 0 0 1 I 0 1 I 2 1 I 2 1 1 I 9 1 I 0 1 I 0 1 I :0 i0T11L5 I 1 I 307 11129 11036 I I I I 31 I I I I 23 1101 I I I I I RSB I I 61 I I I I 16 I I I I SB 1 135 I I IBI I I 6 1 I 1 71 I I 86 I 24 I I I I I I I I 18 I I 13 I 87 I 31 I I I 96 1214 I 0 1 I 1 B I I 2 1 I 2 I 0 1 I 0 1 I 1 B I I 8 I 2 1 I 14 I I I 0 1 I 2 1 1 lB I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I *MH -Mobile Home \ � ', (^ ).- Z't�' �_� n��'�41i'��`•N�'.�..��.° :.� �"•_ M_ t,ye4�Y"?_r •n�j�� f_'D"*'fi.5". p ' �..- .. n U ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 1'986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR 'Item Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deerfield Addition and Town Centre 70 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS .`Item L. Approve Final Plat, Park Knoll Addition Item 2. Approve Amendment to TIF Program and Development Agreement (Sperry Consolidation Facility) 141 ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deerfield Addition and Town Centre 70 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Approve Final Plat, Park Knoll Addition Item 2. Approve Amendment to TIF Program and Development Agreement (Sperry Consolidation Facility) 141 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY There are no items to be considered under the City Attorney at this time. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Review of Environmental Assessment Worksheet for Deerfield Addition and Town Centre 70 --The City Planning Department has processed two environmental worksheets, one for Deerfield Addition and the second for Town Centre 70. - According to the City Planner the Town Centre 70 Environmental Assessment Worksheet is the first environmental review where comments have been significant in regard to potential impact for environmental concerns. To further addressthis ssue, Dale has prepared a memo which is attached on pagesthrough ( In addition to the memo, copies of letters from the Minnesota Polution Control Agency are als provided for City Council review and referenced as pages athrough /617 There appear to be questions raised at the last joint /Planning Commission/City Council meeting regard- ing the purpose of indirect source permits. The City Attorney's office was asked to provide a summary of legislative authority background, and a summary regarding the involvement of the Minnesota Polution Control Agency and the issuance of indirect source permits. This, legal summary is enclosed on pages/'Q through P- $ for your review. _ ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the City staff regarding a resolution to resolve any and all environmental concerns associated with the Town Centre- 70 develop- ment or suggest an environmental impact statement that would address the full impacts of this development and surrounding developments. , /67- DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Approve Final Plat, Park Knoll Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the Park Knoll Addition located north of Wilderness Run Road, just east of Oakwood Heights Addition as shown on page The final plat conforms with the preliminary plat appro edby Council action on March 19, 1986. All conditions of the preliminary plat approval have been complied with. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the. Park Knoll Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Item 2. Approve Amendment to T.I.F. Program and Development Agreement (.Sperry Consolidation Facility) --In reviewing the legal documents associated with the tax increment financing (TIF) and the development agreement, the attorney for Sperry Corporation discovered that the legal description used in both items did not fully incorporate the improvements associated with the parking lot facilities or the future trailway. Because these improvements add value to the property which should be taken into consideration in the TIF program, it is appropriate that the legal description be revised to accurately reflect the entire scope of all proposed improvements. If this legal description is revised in the TIF program, it is necessary to also revise the development agreement due to its cross reference. Therefore, an amendment has been prepared jointly by the City Attorney and the Sperry Corporation and is being presented to the Council for consideration and approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment to the TIF program and development agreement for the Sperry Consolidation Facility. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator 143 rJ MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DALE C RUNKLE, CITY PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR DEERFIELD ADDN. & TOWN CENTRE 70 The City has processed two Environmental Worksheets. The first is Deerfield Addition consisting of 324 dwelling units. The comments submitted from the state agencies are minor, and the only major comment was that a sewer extension be obtained by the developer. With this being the major issue, staff can recommend that a negative declaration for the Deerfield Addition be granted and that no Environmental Impact Statement would be required for this project. Staff will forward these comments back to the commenting agencies as to the status of this project. The Town Centre 70 Environmental Assessment Worksheet is the first environmental review where comments have been significant in regard to potential impact for environmental concern. The first agency to comment was the Minnesota Department of Transportation where concerns have been raised regarding the drainage of the development into the right-of-way ditch system for I -35E. MnDOT indicated a permit must be obtained for this additional drainage. The second item of concern deals with the intersection of Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road where MnDOT has indicated that a substantial amount of congestion is expected at this intersection because of the lack of internal roadway systems which lead around this major intersection. MnDOT has indicated that once the volume of traffic increases, traffic control devises will be placed on the ramps to the Interstate system. Comments submitted from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency indicate potential carbon monoxide and traffic problems at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. Measures in the traffic report of the EAW suggested an additional turn lane, which may or may not be feasible geometrically to construct and if, in fact, this would mitigate the problem for the traffic generated for this development and other developments in the area. The City had indicated they were contemplating the possibility of doing an overall traffic study which would include the concerns of the Pollution Control Agency. Once the total impact has been determined, then mitigative measures could then be described as to how to resolve the potential problem at Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads. This is the first time that major concerns have been raised in an EAW that have not had definite mitigative measures or solutions attached through this process. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has indicated that the traffic study proposed by the City would be a step to try to resolve potential impacts. If the City does not elect to fund or do a traffic study, the City should then require that Federal Land provide dditional traffic information in W THOMAS L HEDGES SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 PAGE 2 order that questions can be answered in regard to the level of congestion at Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road. If a resolution cannot be made as to how these impacts will be addressed and what mitigative measures will be required, it would then be a suggestion that an Environmental Impact Statement should be done in order to address the full impacts of this development and surrounding development. Therefore, the alternatives in regard to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet would. be to indicate to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency that the City will look at the intersections of Pilot Knob Road/Yankee Doodle Road as to ultimate design, number of trips generated and what improvement measures would be required for this maximum design consideration. If the City elects not to do the traffic study and resolve the mitigative measures issued, then an Environmental Impact Statement should be required in order that all impacts can be addressed for this development proposal. City Plan er DCR/jj %Is It �`NN Tq RECEIVED AUG 2 S 99$fi O y V ° Minnesota Department of Transportation Transportation Building, St. Paul, MN 55155 �OF pe Phone 296-1251 August 25, 1986 Dale Runkle, Planning Director City of Eagan 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: ';Town Centre 70,`- City of Eagan Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) District 9 (Eagan, Dakota Co.) Dear Mr. Runkle: The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has completed a review of the above -referenced EAW. We believe that the proposed project will have some adverse impacts on our transportation facilities. Our main concerns include the following: I. Mn/DOT requires a utility permit for any development adjacent to Mn/DOT right-of-way. We anticipate that a development of this nature will increase the amount of runoff that drains into Mn/DOT property. Since the proposed development is adjacent to Interstate (I)„_35; wetherefore,, requestthatpthe:'.City_of'Eagan;,.obtain'a:;_; c3rainage�pei°mi—t before „beginning thisrojep . _p - II. Mn/DOT has for some time communicated our concern to the City of Eagan that the combination of„ov,er;'?deyelopmeftt: may not be tt e9 .sp will'�,:create;traff Knob.:Road.interse the impact of eac area. Mitigation i criti;. � lca d.ntersec ,.... ;problgms sat:the�;o However, our main ional development at --tnis ;rimes e., �.. e.;Doodle/P,ilgt concern, is in the Eagan ffic'svolumes=a When the proposed development begins to affect the operations of 135E ramps and loops, Mn/DOT will implement traffic control measures necessary to ensure the continued safe operation of our transportation system. These traffic measures may cause additional traffic congestion on Yankee Doodle or Pilot Knob Roads. 1W6 An Equal Opporrunny Employer f �k Dale Runkle Page 2 August 25, 1986 III. It is Mn/DOT's understanding that Rainbow Foods, two fast foot restaurants, and part of the retail center have already been built. It is not clear in the EAW whether these buildings were analyzed as part of the proposed development. It seems too late to analyze the potential impacts these existing buildings will have when they have already been built. If you have any questions concerning Mn/DOT's comments, please contact Jerry Skelton, Planning Coordinator at our District Office in Oakdale phone number (612) 779-1210. Sincerely, Cheryl Heide, Environmental Coordinator Environmental Services Section August 27, 1986 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Mr. Dale Runkle Planning Director 3795 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Dear Mr. Runkle: Re: Town Centre 70 Environmental Assessment Worksheet The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has reviewed the environmen- tal assessment worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Town Centre 70 project located in Eagan, and has the following comments to offer. Although a noise problem is not anticipated due to the lack of residential receivers, the noise analysis is incomplete. The FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model was used to predict the L50 noise levels, however this model does not involve L50 data. Therefore the methodology used in computing the L50 numbers needs to be documented. Additionally, the L10 noise level numbers are missing from the noise analysis and need to be included. Regarding air quality concerns, a substantial potential exists for impacting I -35E and other surounding roadways unless this project is carefully planned. The carbon monoxide (CO) analysis is based on trip reduction factors which are not particularly conservative according to nationally accepted standards. Additionally, MPCA staff in the air quality division feel that the second left turn lane at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Yankee Doodle Road (as noted on p. 17) may not be geometrically possible and may not solve traffic flow problems. Therefore, the CO estimates on p. 16 may not be correct since they rely on that second left turn lane. MPCA staff has learned that Eagan is con- ducting a traffic study for this area. The cooperation of the developer of Town Centre 70 with this study could certainly aid in a solution for this intersec- tion. When such a solution is developed, an Indirect Source Permit (ISP) should be applied for. No further construction should occur on the site until the ISP is received. 1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-2785 Regional Offices • Duluth/Brainerd/Detroit Lakes/Marshall/Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer// BOO. (O Mr. Dale Runkle Page 2 Please contact Marlene Voita of my staff at 296-7796 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, oCr . Anderson Director Office of Planning & Review CTA/JP:njm cc: Mr. J. David Thornton, Division of Air Quality Mr. John Seltz, Division of Air Quality Mr. Steve Schwanke, City of Eagan Ms. Susanne Pelly, Division of Air Quality Mr. Dave Kelso, Division of Air Quality HAUGE, EIDE & HELIX R. P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW WATER VIEW OFFICE TOWER. SUITE 303 1200 YANKEE DOODLE ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55123 PAUL H. HAUGE KEVIN W. EIDE DAVID G. KELLER LORI M. BELLIN MICHAEL J. MAYER Mr. Thomas Hedges Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 RE: Indirect Source Permits/City of Eagan Dear Tom: September 3, 1986 AREA CODE 912 TELEPHONE 459-9000 454-4224 The question as to the City of Eagan's involvement in Pollution Control Agency issued Indirect Source Permits covering facilities, building structures, etc., has raised several questions by City staff. The purpose of this letter is to cite certain related issues that may be helpful to the City Council and the staff in dealing with ISP's relating to new development in the future. Legislative Authority 1. Statutory authority for the issuance of indirect source permits by the Minnesota PCA is found under M.S.A. 116.06 et. seq. 2. The PCA under 116.07, subd. 2, has the obligation to adopt standards of air quality and shall take into account various factors such as existing physical conditions, zoning classifications,, topography, prevailing wind conditions and residential industrial nature of the area. Cities may set standards of air quality that are more stringent than those set by the PCA. 3. In addition, 116.07, subd. 4, provides that the PCA may adopt, amend, and rescind rules and standards regarding air pollution. 4. M.S.A. 116.07, subd. 4.a. provides that the PCA may issue permits under such conditions as it may prescribe for the prevention of pollution, for the emission of air contaminants, etc. 5. M.S.A. 116.05 allows all State departments and agencies to enter into the necessary agreements with Cities, etc. to control pollution under Chapter 116. /76 Mr. Thomas Hedges September 3, 1986 Page 2 Background 1. -The issue dealing with the Indirect Source Permit issue has been found in Minnesota Statutes since about 1977, but apparently it's only very recently that the PCA has been taking a much stronger stand concerning the provisions of the permits, and has attempted to involve the affected municipality. Questions 1. Does the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under existing statutes and rules, have the authority to name a City as a co -permittee on an Indirect Source Permit? If the answer is yes, should the City accept the responsibility as a co -permittee under terms outlined by the Pollution Control Agency or through a negotiated process with the PCA and assume the obligations that are placed upon the City, both on the short-term including construction costs, and on the long-term covering administrative and monitoring responsibilities? 2. Should the City object and refuse to act as a co -permittee in the ISP process? Issues of General Concern 1. Ordinarily a City may not act unless it has specific legislative authority to do so. It may be argued the PCA can, under Chapter 116, force cities to comply with standards, regulations and rules, but may not be able to force a City to affirmatively act, including construction of additional roadways to comply with ISP standard and perform extraordinary monitoring and administrative duties in the future. 2. The approach that the PCA has taken is that it will unilaterally act on the permit and does not need to enter into an agreement with either the applicant or the City in enforcing its will in this respect. In one case in Bloomington, the PCA acted without Bloomington's input whatsoever, on a negotiated basis solely with the developer. It appears that this will not happen in the future. 3. The City has not been an applicant in the process but has been brought in as a party. /7/ Mr. Thomas Hedges September 3, 1986 Page 3 4. Should the City adopt an ordinance covering ..the regulations or amend its development and subdivision ordinance to provide for a continuation of the obligations of the developer for costs, etc. for the indirect source permit. The objective is that the City as a co -permittee, will have continuing obligations and an agreement was prepared with the Wachovia developers covering extraordinary costs to be paid by the developer, and its successors, over the period of the effectiveness of the permit. 5. .Under Rule 7001.130, there are a group of conditions that can be included in the permit and these provisions should be followed closely in the negotiating process with the PCA staff. 6. Any planned development agreement or ordinance or both, should possibly provide that all information required to be submitted to the PCA by the applicant, should also be submitted to the City, and that there may be a requirement for the on-going submission of information at the time of commencement of the planned development agreements, development agreements, or the application for building permits. 7. Another issue is the provision that the developer would notify the City of assignment ofits interest in a development. One problem with this may be that when a developer has sold or developed all of its interest in a development, there of course, would be no further responsibility by the developer and there may no longer be an applicant permittee in existence for the City to look to for ultimate responsibility for payment of extraordinary costs. 8. It is important, obviously, that the City make certain that the development is done in an orderly manner and in compliance with state regulations, including the ISP permit regulations which of course will have a long-term effect on the development and growth of the City. In addition, the regulations could very well change and the effect of such rule changes would also have to be assessed from time to time relating to developments that are already commenced and in process. Summary 1. It is obvious that the PCA has taken a fairly strong stand concerning the issuance of ISP's and the unilateral grant of the permit is the position that the PCA has taken to date. Clearly, MSA 116.05, subd. 1 provides that all state departments should cooperate with local municipalities relating to the issuance of permits. By definition, 116.06, subd. 8 defines person to include applicants and municipalities. //y Mr. Thomas Hedges September 3, 1986 Page 4 2. Unfortunately, there is no precedent in case law or specific provision in the statute or PCA promulgated rules about cities being required to be co - permittees. The PCA's position is that its rule-making authority give it the right to require cities to so act. 3. I have talked with Jocelyn Olson of the Attorney General's office assigned to the PCA at #296-7343 and she indicated that although there may be some argument concerning the City's role and duties, the PCA has taken a strong position in respect to the City's position. I have also talked with the Bloomington City Attorney, Floyd Olson, and the Assistant Bloomington City Administrator, Larry Lee, who have been involved deeply with the PCA regarding the Mega Mall ISP. Although they have strong reservations about the City acting as a co -permittee, they feel it's important that the City be involved in the negotiation of the issuance of the permits and generally the developers are extremely anxious to move forward, which does not give an opportunity for a challenge if there is the concern that the PCA is being overly demanding. 4. One method of handling such a challenge would be to put together a shell proposal and submit the permit through the process and then challenge the PCA's authority by an appeal to the District Court. This would be costly and the outcome would be somewhat uncertain. 5. I would suggest a meeting with City staff to formulate some guidelines concerning how to handle the PCA permits as the issue arises. PHH:ras cc: Dale Runkle Steve Schwanke /73 yours., b KELLER, P.A. Paul H. Hauge PARK KNOLL ADDITION lea �s N 89'55754'W \,KTA vi MTHTHE E sidA, I:, Avs 454 39 t,O / ♦♦ Awa Uro .�\ ,\ �`4` rP.eS f• qb /,'�. m`0; ° h \; � ♦ �/ too �L �`� �e ,.` � VICINITY MAP 1 • I e� r A. SCALE JA SEC 16, . 14 ADE 13 NORTH \ [ p d SCALE IN _FEET 3.•f poo i��.��.\ \• •\/°Ss /�'�' ///' �� 't:• 'e°w �-. 6A0`D Iw - So— o bo iao �� ^ / (� � �''�� .,� � � E . QP ,, / VO 5'e • ,'/ ` d,,. a °'is ��T)D\e s62` � � i ' a• r• Ee S. �r `/ ° / f .e �' / _ 3F, / MA"AGE Gro UrFus.,.EASEMENTS {�} ARE SHOWN THUS d R 3/ o:dy 9t• °e./l to 1p IDI ID \•OZ� Sevvsst �•. CN a •• j ;,j .� V G_, 6[v41 5 [En iA y.01. r.40 1 / Sw•e s, 1 /.�t j\ /� -` ``p� / UHuss oT.Enas[ / ~ 'ADwJTEO pw'HE'LAT SS;w_�-s�.dPc.,i- Ot P p.1SSy, z3odvr / A�A K. R° i XHIBIT "A" AGENDA — REGULAR MEETING ,EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 6:30 P.M. 1 I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES />o�`• OO III. 6:40 - KIDS -'N -KINSHIP PROCLAMATION IV. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT MAD BUSINESS ('3:5 A. Parks & Recreation Department p� (� B. I� Cable Commission v. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA a1� A. •(4 B. Contractor's Licenses Personnel Items Poa.15 C. Contract 85-25, Final Payment/Acceptance (Rahn & Ridgecliff Parks Parking Lots and Trailways Surfacing �.I D. Project 485, Receive Petition/Order Report and Plans (Lexington Square 6th Addition) E. Project 484, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Burr Oak Addition) F. Approve Final Plat, Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition BOG. Approve Resolution Requesting Connection Permit to MWCC Sewer (Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition) Fa.-.xH. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 70 - 5th Addition VI. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer (continued from July 15, 1986, City Council meeting) ea ',:7a B. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 428, Kennebec Drive - Streets & Utilities fw�SS C. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 429, Town Centre 70 & 100 Additions - Streets & Utilities S4o D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 417, Birchpark Addition - Streets r� S7N E. & Utilities Final Assessment Hearing, Project 419, Slaters Acres - Streets & Utilities (p0 F. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 423, Group W Cable Addition - Streets P Final Assessment Hearing, Project 433, Lexington Square 2nd Addition p - Trunk Storm & Sanitary Sewer H. Public Hearing for Vacation of a Portion of Eagan Industrial Road Public Hearing for Proposed 1987 General Operating Budget 1 VI. OLD BUSINESS p ^,CJ A. Conditional Use Permit for Liquor License at the Compri Hotel, \ U Prism Hotel Management Located on Lots 1,2,&3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park & Outlet A of Eagandale Office Park,. South of I-494 & East of Pilot Knob Road, NW 1/4 of Section 3 (continued from August 19, 1986, City Council meeting) VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1 q-1\ A. Bow & Arrow Hunting Season Clarification PJ'•J�oB. Waiver of Plat (Metropolitan Waste Control Commission) to Split a a5.36 Acre Parcel from a 32 Acre parcel Known as Tract C, Located West of Hwy 13 & NW of Commanche Road, NW 1/4 of Sec 17 p.,..��C. Rezoning (Michael R. Wills) from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single v Family) for Lots 6 - 13, Block 1, Killdeer Addition, Located East of T.H. 49 Abutting Joyce Court, NW 1/4 of Sec 12 p $l, D. Preliminary Plat for Town Centre 100 Third Addition (Federal Land \ Company) Consisting of 2 Lots and 2 Outlets on Approximately 2.5 Acres Located on Lot 1, Block 1, & Outlots C & D of Town Centre 100 First Addition, South of Yankee Doodle Rd Abutting Lexington Ave, Q NE 1/4 of Sec 15 pA, `\E. Preliminary Plat for Fairway Hills 2nd Addition (Derrick Land \ Company) Consisting of 59 Single Family Lots on Approximate 25 Acres, Located SE Quadrant of Cliff and Pilot Knob Roads, NW 1/4 of Sec 34 F. Preliminary Plat for Sunpointe (Advance Developers) Consisting of 90 Townhouse Units on Approximately 10.5 Acres Located West of Blackhawk-Road Abutting Diffley Road, SW 1/4 of Sec 20 Preliminary Plat for Johnny Cake Ridge Fifth Addition (Good Value Homes Inc) Consisting of 12 Townhouse Units on Approximately 4 Acres, Located South of Cliff Road & East of Johnny Cake Ridge Road, NW 1/4 of Sec 33 I%. ADDITIONAL ITERS A. Public Improvement Contracts: e� 13a 1. Contracts 86-21 & 86-22, Receive Bids/Award Contracts (Lighting - Parking Lot) 2. Contract 86-23, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) 3. Contract 86-24, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Towerview Road & Highview Avenue) p*1\3(.4. Contract 86-25, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Burr Oaks \ V Addition) B. Private Improvement Contracts: 1. Project 85 -BB, Final Acceptance (R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition) ,x,6•(31 2. Project 85 -RR, Final Acceptance (Rahn Ridge Addition) P v\"c Comparable Worth Update X. VISITORS TO BE BEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) %I. ADJOURNMENT IV MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION ..APPROVE MINUTES/AGENDA After approval is given to the September lb, 1986 .agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the September 2, 1986 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration': Kids -'N -Kinship Proclamation --The City from the Kids -'N -Kinship asking that 40 the week of September 21 through 28 as of Eagan. For a copy f the letter to pages ,7- through. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM•: 21 through 28 as National Kinship Week. *1 has received a request Mayor Blomquist proclaim Kinship Week in the City and proclamation, refer To. proclaim September Kids -`N -Kinship 1509 E Crystal Lk Rd. Burnsville, MN 55337 Mayor A,.. City of • Kinship is a volunteer friendship program for children needing stable adult companionship. The National Kinship Advisory Board declared September 21 - 28 as National Kinship Week to help promote the program. Our Governor has signed a proclamation proclaiming September 21 - 28 as Minnesota Kinship Week. Di'eclore DICK '& CAROL FRICK 1509 E- Crystal L4 Rd Ownuille. MN 55337 (612) 035-7769 Kids -'N -Kinship, serving the youth of Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan, Farmington, Lakeville, and Rosemount, would like to have the Mayor sign our local proclamation declaring Kinship Week in the City of We would like about three minutes time at the ® Council meeting to present the proclamation to theVMayor eb sign. Thank you, Kids -'N -Kinship Board Booklet enclosed 9 41fte'�" A PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Kids -'N -Kinship was founded in February of 1972 by ®' individuals understanding the need of the youth in the community. WHEREAS, Kids -'N -Kinship is a volunteer friendship program that finds a common interest between adult volunteers and children which have been referred to our program. WHEREAS,.Kids-'N-Kinship is available to children within the community of Eagan regardless of race, creed, color or financial status. THEREFORE, I, Bea Bloomquist, Mayor of Eagan, do hereby proclaim September 21 - 28,. 1986 as Kinship Week in the community. NOW, THEREFORE, I urge citizens to acquaint themselves with the principals and objectives of Kids -'N -Kinship. IN TESTIMONY„ WHEREOF I hereunto set my hand proclaiming ®' KIDS -'N -KINSHIP WEEK this Sixteenth Day of September, Nineteen Hundred Eighty -Six. MA MAYOR BEA BLOOMQUIST L N F1ZJ eNbS1)l P J1 caring and sfiaavng yroyaan, for ymtk KIDS -IN -KINSHIP " 1509 E. Crystal LK. RD. Burnsville, Mn. 55337 Phone 612-435-7769 "• A nonprofit organization, -totally. ;!I volunteer. We have no paid staff. A KINSMAN'S PRAYER Lord; let me remember that euery day - I q Children are born who will lose their way. And in their frailty from far and wide; Let them draw near... • to my side. That I may share the gifts that are mine; And forget not; these children are Thine. •, �i Edward J. Lisner If you are a single person, couple, or'family, we have'a child waiting for you to be their "Special Friend". For further information and applications please contact / Carol Frick 435-7769 C Kathy Tannehill 432-2449 , Ed Lisner 454-8355• DO IT NOW ,THE NEED IS GREAT O00 •. 0 O I. MW IMiJ L1 L1NI M �V W i L N F1ZJ eNbS1)l P J1 caring and sfiaavng yroyaan, for ymtk THE INGREDIENTS OF KINSHIP Y,,,.INDNESS'AND UNDERSTANDING MPROVING THE ADULT -CHILD RELATIONSHIP EVER LETTING A CHILD DOWN HARING A LITTLE OF YOUR,,5I TIME AND LOVE AVING FUN WITH YOUR CHILD NCREASING A CHILD'S SELF-CONFIDENCE ROVIDING STABLE COMPANIONSHIP Kinship is a preventative program. The goals and objectives are to provide the friendship and guidance a child needs to avoid serious problems in the future. It is important for these children to be exposed to different environments and to give them chance to do some of the things i they are unable to do because of their present situation. What is Kinship Kinship is a friendship program for children $ to 16 years of age who have a need for stable adult companionship. Where are the children from The children are referred to us by professional people in our area such as counselors, teachers, public health nurses, caseworkers, and mothers who realize their children need this help. The areas served are Apple Valley, 'Burnsville, Eagan',.Farmington, Lakeville, and Rosemount. I Who is involved as volunteers Single men and women,.couples, and families who have an interest in working with children. i What is expected of a volunteer To accept the child as he is, be his "Special Friend", and maintain a once a week contact with him... preferably for at least a year's time. KINSHIP IS FUNANDREWARDING !:: • Agenda Information Memo,, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two A. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --The City of Eagan has received notification that our LAWCON/LCMR Grant for Thomas Lake Park was ranked number one for all metropolitan communities and that funding in the amount of" $330,000 should be certain for this project. The total project cost is $4,50,000 of which the City's match is $120,000 from funds that exist in the Park Site Fund. For a map and the estimated .development cost for Thomas Lake Community Park improvements refer to pages G through For a copy of background information and the resolution was prep red by the Director of Parks and Recreation refer to pages = through ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny adoption of a resolution that authorizes the filing of the application and execution of grant project agreement with the State of Minne- sota to complete all grant d'ocumehtation on the Thomas Lake project. i .a,d.d3+1a4�8Jrod wfs-<"�c�+ns"+��d'.�ia.!nrt.�rn:a y�•sa.sa.;.� > s - - r •v. _y ,._r>L,�y-�1 ...., +�,.., .- �'i rll:.a: r, T - 'f�If (yt'rl�+V, Jy{y\,�,[n' � •q4 •e���r� � .\l \ ��f .. - �.! � � - N:/y'F'"'F-�'. 41't�"el'7Ck F-" �• l to �, s f f " s ..' r1 k x44 �� �: r• 1 +r4ri r 1} S r; `LutfwoHj� k � til �� �� �-- +. � «, � � v � Ys' '" � ,,:; I Q �- 1 r • llbtu a.�l.�y -."c t: ' t a kr �" -1 <F f j Y �.i�9 I. ) ,•.� 1 r•_ 1 r - ca n � ami yam\ _ ' °v' 11:,:\`� a II, / - .'�•� '�`J{/� / y \ �I, ' \ Ct MI.1 a:Yl' a 1 -u!\ -_.� �I////1//1��//)/ � _ - ,•l• � � G...- �i �_� , 0 l� fc wiCM N6{ck`�jrSl't•wr"�'rfr Cf1•i•�2tvr 7 —j coi C -N. p \ _//; Lu � r .5. - ' .r, w �. ' , 1 1� , r l+lr+. •x \ '. pr txt ' - -�� 't'3.• k° ,us THOMAS LAKE COMMUNITY PARK .I IINARY DEVELOPMENT ESTIMATE Quantity Facility/Improvement Cost . Grading and General Sitework $66,000. • Utilities 34,000 Roadways and Parking Lots 60,000. 6,200 L.F. Bituminous Trails 50,000. 2,200 L.F. Aggregate Trails 5,500. Turf Establishment 49,000. Landscaping 30,000. 1 Park Building/Restrooms•" 60,000. 1 Fishing Pier 10,000. 1 Fishing/Observation Wharf 10,000. 2 Pedestrian Bridges- 22,000. 1 Observation Deck 8,000. 1 Nature Blind 4,500. 1 Interpretive Plaza 20,000. Boat ramp and Launch 7,000. Signage 4,000. Security Lighting 10,000. • TOTAL: $450,000. 7 MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 - LAWCON/LCMR GRANT THOMAS LAKE PARK Backaround At the recommendation of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, the City Council had previously approved an application for grant assistance for the development of Thomas Lake Community Park. A preliminary application was submitted and recently Staff learned that Eagan's application was ranked number one for metropolitan communities. This ranking should insure funding of the project based on current federal and state funding • of the LAWCON and LCMR Program. Action Required A final application must now be prepared and submitted by October 24 to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development Grants Section and the National Parks Service for review. Typically, LCMR concurrence with the project would happen in December and National Park Service concurrence in January of 1987. Final contract agreements would be completed in February, in time for a spring start of construction. The Council is asked to approve submission of the final grant application and to approve the attached Resolution. The City will be seeking $225,000 in LAWCON funds and $105,000 in •LCMR funds for a total of $330,000. The City will provide $120,000 in matching funds from the Park Site Fund for a total project cost of $450,000. FOR COUNCIL ACTION: To approve the attached Resolution for submission of the grant application for the development of Thomas Lake Community_ Park. rector of Parks and Recreat KV/mc CITY OF EAGAN RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN AUTHORIZING FILING OF APPLICATION AND EXECUTION OF GRANT PROJECT AGREEMENT TO DEVELOP OPEN SPACE UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE FEDERAL LAND AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND ACT AND THE STATE NATURAL RESOURCES FUND. WHEREAS, the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act and the State Natural Resources Fund provides for the making of grants to assist local governments in the acquisition and development of outdoor recreation projects; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan desires to develop certain land known as Thomas Lake Community Park, which 'land is to be held and used for permanent open space; and WHEREAS, in order for the proposed project to be eligible for approval, there must be proof that it is part of a comprehensive outdoor recreation plan and five-year action program (capital improvement); and WHEREAS, it is estimated -that the cost of developing said interest shall be $450,000.00; and WHEREAS, upon project approval, the, City of Eagan must enter into formal grant project agreements with the state for the specific purpose of developing Thomas Community Lake Park. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN:. That an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Parks -and Recreation Grants Section for a grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund of 1965, as amended, for an amount presently estimated to be $225,000.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of cost from other funds available to it. 2. That an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of • Energy and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section, for a grant from the Natural Resources Fund (Minnesota Laws, 1985, Chapter 13, Section 31, Subdivision 5, paragraph a, for an amount presently estimated at $105,000.00 and the applicant will pay the balance of the cost from other funds available to it. 3. That the Mayor of the City Council and the City Administrator are directed to execute and file: a) such application and the 5 -year action program with the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section and to provide additional information and furnish such documents as may be required by said Department; and b) to act as the authorized correspondents of the applicant. 4. That the proposed development is in accordance with plans for the allocation of land for open space uses and that should said grant be made, the applicant will develop and retain said land for use(s) designated in said application and approved by the National Park Service and the Department of Energy and Economic Development. 5. That the United States of America and the State of Minnesota be and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the applicant with the 9 regulations of the Department of Interior, effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Section 504; Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and Executive Order 11246, Equal Employment Opportunity. 6. That the City of Eagan enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Energy and Economic Development, Parks and Recreation Grants Section, to provide such grants as are specified in numbered paragraphs 1 and 2, above, for the years 1986 - 1988. 7. That the Mayor of the City Council and the City Administrator are authorized and directed to execute such agreement and any supplemental agreements thereof. CITY OF EAGAN CITY - COUNCIL By: Its Mayor • Attest: Its Clerk Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Gene VanOverbeke, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true • and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Eagan at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 16th day of September, 1986, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. Gene VanOverbeke, City City of Eagan /O Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three B. CABLE Cable Commission --Ralph Campbell is .expected to be answer any questions regarding the sale transaction that ing through the Joint Cable Commission at this time. tional information on this item refer to the informative present to is proceed - For addi— memo. Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four There are eight (8) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTORS' LICENSES A. Contractors' Licenses --Attached on page /3 is a list of the contractors who are renewing or who have been selected and retained as the builder by a customer either living in or planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors have references from other municipalities or their clients' permit applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor license. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: contractors' licenses as presented. _To approve the list of • • CONTRACTORS LICENSES SEPTEMBER 16, 1986 GENERAL CONTRACTORS 1. HARVEY H BRAUN CONST 2. HEATHERWOOD HOMES INC 3. WILLARD HOFF 4. JALCO CONST CO INC 5. P.C. KENNEDY 6. NATIONAL MINERALS CORP 7. PETROLEUM MAINTENANCE CO • 8. ROCHON CORPORATION HOMEOWNER 1. DAVID KELLY PLUMBERS 1. ELANDER PLBG CO INC 2. HOVDE PLBG & HTG • 3. JERRY'S PLBG 4. JOE'S PLBG & HTG 5. DAN JOHNSON PLBG Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Five PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items --There are three (3) items to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. 1. Compost Site Monitor --A vacancy exists for the part-time seasonal position of compost site monitor. It is the recommendation of Administrative, Assistant Hohenstein that Lori Belz be hired for this seasonal position.. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Lori Belz for the position of part-time seasonal compost site • monitor. 2. Clerk—Typist/Protective Inspections --Approximately 40 applications were received for the vacant position of Clerk Typist in the Protective Inspections Department. Twelve applicants were given typing, written and telephone testing. From these, five applicants were selected for interviewing. Interviews were conducted by Chief Building Official Peterson, Inspections/Parks Secretary Severson and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their recommendation that Cheryl Malmanger be hired to fill the vacant position subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of Cheryl Malmanger as a clerk -typist in the Protective Inspections Department, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. 3. Car Allowance for City Administrator --The City Administrator is givencar allowance in lieu of using a City vehicle. Car allowance for 19'85 was $'38'3 per month. The 1986 budget was adopted with an appropriation that would allow up to $416 per month. Due to an oversight that the car allowance was not included as a part of compensation adjustment in January/February and with other business at hand the absence of this item for City Council review has continued all year. The Consumer Price Index for Minneapolis/St. Paul for all urban consumers during 1985 was 3.88. Utilizing this adjustment for the car allowance the monthly increase should be $15. This is less than the budgeted amount, however seems reasonable considering the CPI for gasoline is 3.7. The car allowance is intended to cover all expenses .including depreciation, maintenance, insurance and other expenses. This increase is retroactive to cover all expenses incurred during 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a car allowance increase of 3.88 for cal qar year 1986 for the City Administrator. [ Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Six CONTRACT 85-25, FINAL PAYI;WNT/ACCEPTANCE C. Contract 85-25, Final Payment/Acceptance (Rahn & Ridgecliff Parks Parking Lots and Trailways Surfacing) --The Director of • Parks and Recreation is recommending final payment acceptance for Rahn and Ridgecliff Parks parking lot and trail paving. The work has been reviewed and accepted as performed by Valley Paving. The original contract amount was $84,418.75 which was revised to $84,183.55. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the work as completed for City Contract 85-25 and make final payment to Valley Paving in the amount of $4,209.18. 1_15� Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting. Page Seven PROJECT 485, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER REPORT & PLANS D. Project 485, Receive Petition/Order Report & Plans (Lexington Square 6th Addition) --The staff has received a petition requesting, the upgrading of Northview Park Road with streets and utilities to service the Lexington Square 6th Addition. In addition to guaranteeing the cost of the feasibility report, the petitioner has extended that guarantee in requesting simultaneous preparation of detailed plans and specifications for this improvement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition and authorize the preparation of report and plans for Project 485 (Lexington Square 6th Addition - Northview Park Road). • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight PROJECT 484/BURR OAK ADDITION E. Project 484, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (Burr Oak Addition --At the September 2 Council meeting, the Council accepted a petition from the developer of the Burr Oak Addition to have the installation of streets and utilities to the first phase of Burr Oaks performed under a City contract. Subsequently, staff has initiated the preparation of the feasibility report for the public hearing process in anticipation of holding formal public hearing on October 21. Due to the fact that the plans and specifications had already been prepared by the developer's private engineer, it was possible for the staff to quickly complete the detailed feasibility report which is being presented this evening in consideration of scheduling that public hearing for October 21. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 484 (Burr Oak Addition) and order the public hearing to be held October 21, 1986. l7 • • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nine APPROVAL FINAL PLAT - EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK F. Approve Final Plat, Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition (Compri 'Hotel) located on the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and Corporate Center Drive as referenced by the final plat on page This final plat conforms with the preliminary plat approv d by Council action on July 15, 1986. All final plat application materials have been submitted, reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • Ypr.l Y• _ _a. N r. •w 0 0 EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH ADDITION • IyY _IYW: 1.I ly Olrnllx VI••; 1`11 YYWI (wrl. I • uxlu Ywxr., �r w.Vr YI. ww w 1. rlo '.�Itr�n.n• Irluu rr, w YYx •. Ir•\1.•1 rnv .w, x.r.W 1. 1_... IIx 1. IWryl 11.11• IVII r tx•r,. InY �WY11. •u1 IlY Y1y111W W:•IIY ur1 • r. wl u. u.ii...1r•y 1: Ir ..Lw. ...1 rw , w1:.••i.�.IW�rY1.. rx 1�•r� w Y 1 1 WY1- YII[Iw n111Yr 1•.�•••Is �1 w •1u w•1•In Y r•w Iw11 _ u 11.1 1 w xryY•1 1 •111^ Y xrx wr I ly •.Irwl. VIYI \III YW VI I••/x.. • • l.wn w. u u wnMl Y V xrr Y W.wr YIY.r rl YI v.w Y•1 Y Y V.wn nllr.l I w a.wnl_w.. \III YrWI Iw. =W1•Y Y TW rnrlwwr\rn. rlw_ •Yr w w —r w elrnir Y� wl Irr1Y\ sr1. • . t.wrr .Ilw~Iir r.W. WII 1 wr 1 1 r+ vw/w w 1 111•V•\I rrly w .r rnr, r ra. r Iw. r• r _�Iw1 r rl � :Iran �•qu W, ••r. r x ••w. nru ..rlvl. r.11 Y ••rlr. r•Imnw =:7.—,, 'r 1 •n•y I...r.r'I 1wwYY. .Y r•r4• _I.. _ —w r W s Yrr a Yi. •�• tip. Iw• Y. YY. — �_I Iw1111 W1 . • —W •1� w—W 11111._11 M tr, ••W W w uI. IW. nl1 W[Y Y IYr, Y_IYu ' M Ir _I 1=tWIn 111. \ • .Y, 1111. .1 lr Wu11wY Ir1/Fw 11n Y11�•. Yn IYI Y w•!•VI Y — •1 569 • Y/I•Wwlr lr� ..11•.�wi Wr•1... WY• •r11Y1 r1•• r \ ;^ 1 I IYrN YI YI w. 1 • r1aY w rw1 1 YUVx 4V•h • W1I=YI.r; 11w w Ynww .1 •.rYlwl W • W r. M t --- S69.36'24•E 37700 LOT. •.�L iPs9.] ICr I. i. M�Y1 rlllr _.• _n Yw •• —WT Y� \Y w YI• •1.1 n 11•wrl\I YI N •� r�'e%-, h.T .Irl. '•�^=• w a.wnl_w.. \III YrWI Iw. =W1•Y Y TW rnrlwwr\rn. rlw_ •Yr w w —r w elrnir Y� wl Irr1Y\ sr1. • . t.wrr .Ilw~Iir r.W. WII 1 wr 1 1 r+ vw/w w 1 111•V•\I rrly w .r rnr, r ra. r Iw. r• r _�Iw1 r rl � :Iran �•qu W, ••r. r x ••w. nru ..rlvl. r.11 Y ••rlr. r•Imnw =:7.—,, 'r 1 •n•y I...r.r'I 1wwYY. .Y r•r4• _I.. _ —w r W s Yrr a Yi. •�• tip. Iw• Y. YY. — �_I Iw1111 W1 . • —W •1� w—W 11111._11 M tr, ••W W w uI. IW. nl1 W[Y Y IYr, Y_IYu ' M Ir _I 1=tWIn 111. \ • .Y, 1111. .1 lr Wu11wY Ir1/Fw 11n Y11�•. Yn IYI Y w•!•VI Y — •1 569 • Y/I•Wwlr lr� ..11•.�wi Wr•1... WY• •r11Y1 r1•• r \ ;^ 1 I IYrN YI YI w. 1 • r1aY w rw1 1 YUVx 4V•h • W1I=YI.r; 11w w Ynww .1 •.rYlwl W • W r. M t rY �I r1 r1 w,Yw 11+ n..r W wM— LOT. w a.wnl_w.. \III YrWI Iw. =W1•Y Y TW rnrlwwr\rn. rlw_ •Yr w w —r w elrnir Y� wl Irr1Y\ sr1. • . t.wrr .Ilw~Iir r.W. WII 1 wr 1 1 r+ vw/w w 1 111•V•\I rrly w .r rnr, r ra. r Iw. r• r _�Iw1 r rl � :Iran �•qu W, ••r. r x ••w. nru ..rlvl. r.11 Y ••rlr. r•Imnw =:7.—,, 'r 1 •n•y I...r.r'I 1wwYY. .Y r•r4• _I.. _ —w r W s Yrr a Yi. •�• tip. Iw• Y. YY. — �_I Iw1111 W1 . • —W •1� w—W 11111._11 M tr, ••W W w uI. IW. nl1 W[Y Y IYr, Y_IYu ' M Ir _I 1=tWIn 111. \ • .Y, 1111. .1 lr Wu11wY Ir1/Fw 11n Y11�•. Yn IYI Y w•!•VI Y — •1 • Y/I•Wwlr lr� ..11•.�wi Wr•1... WY• •r11Y1 r1•• r \ ;^ 1 I IYrN YI YI w. 1 • r1aY w rw1 1 YUVx 4V•h • W1I=YI.r; 11w w Ynww .1 •.rYlwl W • W r. M t rY �I r1 r1 w,Yw 11+ n..r W wM— LOT. •.�L iPs9.] ICr I. i. M�Y1 rlllr _.• _n Yw •• —WT Y� \Y w YI• •1.1 n 11•wrl\I YI r .�` LOT. 37'W 61076 --"� t Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Ten APPROVE RESOLUTION - MWCC SEWER G. Approve Resolution Requesting Connection Permit to MWCC Sewer (Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition) --In order to obtain the most cost effective sanitary sewer service for the proposed future Compri Hotel within this subdivision, it is necessary to connect to the existing Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) north interceptor line adjacent to the northeast property line of this addition. In order to connect to this Metropolitan controlled facility, it is necessary for the City Council to pass a resolution indicating there is no other viable utility available. Although there is a sanitary sewer located within Corporate Center Drive, its depth and capacity cannot handle this proposed development as well as a direct connection to the trunk interceptor line. Enclosed on page is a copy of the resolution for Council approval. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution authorizing connection to MWCC facilities for the Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk. to execute all related documents. ;SlJ RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN AUTHORIZING CONNECTION TO MWCC FACILITIES EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 4TH ADDITION WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) owns and operates certain trunk sanitary sewer lines within the City of Eagan; and, WHEREAS, in order to respond to a request to provide sewer service to surrounding development (Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition, Compri Motel) a sewer service connection to a MWCC trunk sanitary sewer is necessary because the City has no sewer line within the immediate vicinity; and, WHEREAS, the MWCC requires a permit for such connection along with the City of Eagan's authorization; and, WHEREAS, this sanitary sewer service is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: 1. The City of Eagan authorized the connection of an 8" sanitary sewer service to the MWCC's North Interceptor for the Eagandale Office Park 4th Addition. 2. The connection will be made in accordance with all condi-tions as set forth in the MWCC permit. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: • Its Mayor Attest: Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in favor: Those against: Dated: September 16, 1986 CERTIFICATION: Its Clerk I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 16th day of September, 1986. VanOverbeke, City Clerk 5% Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eleven FINAL PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 70 FIFTH ADDITION H. Approve Final Plat, Town Centre 70 5th Addition --We have received an application for final plat approval for the above referenced subdivision located nor h"of Rainbow and east of Burger Ring. Enclosed on pagez.23-'Z is a copy of the proposed final plat which conforms with the preliminary plat approved by Council action on August 19, 1986. All final plat application materials have been submitted, -reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for the Town Centre 70 5th Addition and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. :TOWN CENTRE 70...FIFTH ADDITION N \ I 0 U L ' a a J LOT 1 fI r• I70 • _ _ - YI ' =r rr rllY .• rY �rM1r, YYW. aR• s1• I.•1 11' •. i Ilr •/ xTI 11 IM Il1Y Y\ N•I Y • Y•1• Y 1 MrY} II Yla rlx. 1 yYr mxlr WI w• Irvrrlrr rly Y r rIW Y rYr\I rr,m Y. I•,r i � Yr •= — •'i1i•\ .. r r WI ' J � r YY � � rrr Y 44 T \ I 0 U L ' a a J LOT 1 I70 BLOCK 11' •. i • ry. Ir r�rl r\. r w.. ,n • rr,.• YY rte\ 1•rl. � r1I� ��:a• � IIL'.� .e• Ir 1 i . m Y'L V•1 i Lt :4 V•rIr•r `-.� NfYlrr W yd4 M.n• r•.II YYYY r Yxlx YrrN rr 1,•, NIY 1.1 Ir, 1. NIY W r�Yr IN IIY,. r NIy 11.1 Irl U n•U YYlryNr\ IIY. Y1r 1WIYY IYIYy Y W IIN. LAX:II '. COUNTY RGLD PIG 2R TAN P:EE DOODLE HUAD R/W W N OUTLOT to aI PLAT _ / LOT 1,7 BLOCK 1, LOT 1, TOWN BLOCK I; I CENTRE o TOWN 0 T Al!fENTRE,t i 70 70 A FOURTH I rHIRD F OU PITIt II ADDITION I ADL'ITION I J ,;c.N ftk`: I t1H19E � r� .._._...... r P. 17 ::E'h.TFtEX Rc / —'—' EXHIBIT "A" I�• r uriai..i W�rY.n.r'r� u ra, •\ w.rI. xr... w•uu N Yrr14. r 4 L` :• ,M1 . WrYr L IY� Y.rY M1 1plp .Y•r1Y• .vYr Y W IrIY• .Ya lyw• � •- r ..rr \Y •r 1• x". . r w w •Ylr Y 1,A [LTr M1 xlrn rxli y yyHY Ir r • fl' •Y.rY• Y •.N. r IIr YYy r MIIIIT wI/r.• wr. • IS 1. r•r. rlyl YI. r•Yul Yr p.Y.T. VYY•a• rrrl YIWIYIrr W .y Yr 1 Y Y YNY •r NIr .. YIY w V YY I. Cur. yI• Y4 � YT Y NrYI/ ,., j tt •: IYw r .1=Y Y TY M1,TIY IrYr\I r• d�`.rr Yy Y •Y'•Tr Y 1\ YYr OINr • Fr1Y1 YI MI. r. rlr,�l'I • YI I�l�.{•r iiN riLrl YY Yr.•rr • YrYY• rr.IY N,W,yI,. ([ -- roll N11• •'I . 1 nm mwlutt YY 1 Yw YI •r nulY W . .q+Y••nr Y m• r u TY. Mt N 111A Tlq. YY YI• rl'+1• I MIYI 'Ylr I W = '. W\ 11 .YYr• W l'• T;'� 1 r .... r u. rlY a Irl w •w•rn: •i:. Ir\. WI Yi Yn w r rl•W Y W a•W II .\r• WI w Y,•1Y Yw•,I IIw .r• YIIY4II y1Wy . W'YIII 'Ij'• W WI WY Y• r r\ 1•W Y I•.11• NY.•Y Y Y Irlrly NYI 1... Y IrY• rWI Y Mrt i aYmTY Y M1 YITIY /rwPIV WUlluu r wrrrYJ Ylp r YL •• 1 1 f 'f. rYH i 1 r.7111�- 1•—r F Jr• ...rlYw. Yrra• .YI.YY1✓R�� 4Q:• rl-TTY a•.— tux r,rll.. :AM.�.I.r.�, r �,�wY.•I lr ,rl r w ' •' 1 '� T '.f�• W.•. 1 • •YIYY Y•• .lir Y• Y �-•- • U', PY LIrI h1iY11 J1• � 1 � Cl" l IL r sYv, ...Ma 1•Irr\ u.••YI Ix. ar. Y yY.YU IITIr aY• .W W .r• I.r••,Y Y4 T .y r.'['S•� '••�� .r 1 CI.TTT. �.T'RT ..T •�. I rrrr r.u4 WI W \r. I•I W rI a ry w IW war r W . � 1 '�.. Ilr <yIY x rinr .OlYli Yw .r rY rel• Y .Ya Y . 1, • 1 yYr mxlr WI w• Irvrrlrr rly Y r rIW Y rYr\I rr,m Y. I•,r i � Yr •= — •'i1i•\ .. r r WI ' J � r YY � � rrr Y .. r,•I ..1 ;t .OEAN Vll D1111Y1YIrq Page 1• of 2 Pages- --• __._L.. 11 I I E Ovo O Ito 40, Al Ili: 9 1 1 1. IT wA 4Z 0 59 Ito 40, Al Ili: 9 1 1 1. IT wA 4Z 0 59 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twelve PROJECT 473. PILOT KNOB ROAD - TRUNK STORM SEWER A. Public Hearing for Project 473, Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer --On July 15, the initial public hearing was held to discuss the proposed trunk storm sewer improvements necessary for the future upgrading of Pilot Knob Road.._ These improvements were confined primarily to three specific areas: Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park (Hilltop), and Civic Center Site. At that public hearing, there were several concerns and objections raised pertain- ing to the proposed storm sewer outlet for Mooney Lake to McCarthy Lake within Patrick Eagan Park through the wooded backyard areas of several residences. Subsequently, the Council continued the public hearing until September 16 to allow Staff to investigate various alternatives and meet with the affected property owners regarding the proposed alignment. On August 5, the City Administra- tor and consultant engineer met with the affected property owners to discuss the impact of proposed construction and to further discuss feasible alternates. As a result of that meeting, the consultant has investigated and prepared three alternates for discussion and consideration at this continued public hearing. Enclosed on pages ;24 through � is a copy of the original feasibility report for the Council's information and review. En- closed on pagesthrough VL is a copy of an amendment to that report discussing various alternatives to the Mooney Lake outlet. • This amendment was reviewed with the Park Commission at their September 4 meeting. Enclosed on pages s/ through 5/ is a memo from the Director of Parks relating the Park Commission's issues and concerns pertaining to Patrick Eagan Park alternatives. It should be noted that the final plat for the Chatterton Pond Development cannot be approved until this storm sewer alignment issue has been resolved through the public hearing process. The Public Works Director and consultant engineer will discuss the various alternatives in further detail at the Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve Project 473 (Pilot Knob Road - Trunk Storm Sewer) or any of the alternates. REPORT ON PILOT KNOB ROAD • (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER LMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 473 • EAGAN, MINNESOTA FILE No. 49380 / n// l3wWdAao, Rase~,, ril a�.P/ da 9 4UOciaz p ,, Jac. SL pa"4 iLl4mm"la 0 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612-636.4600 June 2, 1986 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Engineers & Architects Re: Pilot Knob Road (Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park, City Hall) Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 473 Our -File No. 49380 Otro G. Ban.,., P.E. NuDen W. Nwrnr. Y.H. JwrYh C. Andrdit, Y.E. Bradfard A. Lrmarq, P.E. Rlchuid E. Turnrr, P.E. Junin C. Olean, P.£. Gbnn R. Coot. P.E. Keith A. G.Man, Y.H. Th... E. Nayn, PE. R,,Aurd W. fester, P.E. Raba, G. Schunichq P.E. Marvin L. Sarva/u, P.E. Donald C. Bugard, P.E. Jrr) A. Baurdan, P.E. Murk A. Nmuan, P.E. Ted K. field, P.E. Michael T Nuwmann. P.E. Naar" N. ki/gj Ie. P.E. David O. Lwka,u, P.E. TAamw W. Percrsan, Y.E. Michael C. Lynch, P.E. Karen L. Willa, P.E. Jaron R. Malaria, P.E. Kenneth P. Andrrean; P E. Kuth A. Bachmann, P.E. Mart R. fialfc. PE. Rabe,, C. Nunek, A. LA. Thai.. E. A,.. P.E. Amt L. Yuune. P.E. Churlre A. LY.. Afan Leo M. Parrhly !tartan .N. Oban Swan M. Cardin U Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Pilot Knob Road Trunk Storm Sewer Im- provements, Project No. 473. This report coveres trunk storm sewer and in- cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONES.TR00 RO ENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly RegisteredProfessional Engineer under the laws of t'e.S too Minnesota. �� fij'vJv Mark A. Hanson Date: June 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 i Approved by � � ,� X epartment of Public Works Date: 4, - 9`46, 5456d ate/ 30 Year Anniversary SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk storm sewer im- provements which .are required at this time due to the proposed upgrading of Pilot Knob Road from I -35E to Cliff Road in 1987. The trunk storm sewer im- provements are located in 3 different areas along Pilot Knob Road and are in- cluded within or adjacent to Evergreen Park, Berry Patch Park and City Hall. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and only slightly modifies the 1984 Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan. .The revision .proposes that the NWL for Pond BP -15 southwest of Evergreen Park be lowered 6.4 ft. to 892.6 as compared to 899.0 as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. This revision to the Master ,Plan is recommended for two reasons: 1. The low point of Sequoia Lane in Evergreen Park Addition can then be drained southwesterly into Pond BP -1'5 thus providing additional capacity within the existing 27" RCP located east of Pilot Knob Road through which this area presently drains. Based on design standards utilized today the existing 27" RCP is approximately 30% under design capacity for a 5 year storm based on its present drainage area. Therefore, redirecting the low point of Sequoia 0 Lane to Pond BP -15 will provide additional capacity for the future storm sewer required in Pilot Knob Road. In addition, the con- struction of this line will provide better street drainage at the intersections of SequoiaLane and Walfrid Street and Sequoia Lane and Lodgepole Drive where additional catch basins are proposed. I Also redirecting this drainage area to Pond BP -15 will allow it to flow by gravity to the Minnesota River rather than through the Carlson Lake lift station where it would have to be pumped to Thomas Lake resulting in additional long term energy costs. Page 1. 5456d Lg 2. The existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive presently discharges into Pond BP -16. However, the controlled elevation of Pond BP -16 is approximately 3' higher than the existing .storm sewer in Lodge - pole Drive. Therefore, by constructing the outlet for Pond BP -15 at a lower elevation and through the existing storm sewer from Lodgepole Drive, this storm sewer can ultimately be drained dry, resulting in less maintenance in.the future. In addition, the de- sired normal water elevation of Pond BP -16 can be preserved as previously intended. It is recommended the project proposed herein be constructed as part of one contract. DISCUSSION: The project for discussion purposes is separated into 3 different areas. Evergreen Park: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing storm sewer within Evergreen Park Addition from the low point in Sequoia Drive southerly along Sequoia Drive and then westerly along Lodgepole Drive to Pond BP -15. It is also proposed to provide additional catch basins in the intersections of Sequoia Drive within Walfrid Street and Lodgepole Drive as shown on the at- s tached drawing. In addition, it is proposed to construct a 12" diameter grav- ity storm sewer outlet from Pond BP -15 to an existing 21" RCP, which serves as the outlet for Pond BP -16 and conveys runoff from the Thomas Lake Elementary School site. The connection to the existing 21" RCP storm sewer will be at a location to provide sufficient grade and capacity to serve as the outlet for Pond BP -15. The 12" diameter storm sewer will also connect to the existing 27" RCP from Lodgepole Drive which presently discharges into Pond BP -16. This connection will allow ,the existing storm sewer in Lodgepole Drive to drain dry Page 2. 5456d y� and also preserve the existing water elevation of Pond BP -16. Design consid- eration for Pond BP -15 are.as follows: Comp. Pro- Comp. Pro- Comp. Proposal Comp. Proposed Plan posed Plan posed Plan Storage Plan Out -Outflow NWL NWL NWL HWL Storage (Ac.Ft.) flow cfs (cfs) Berry Patch Pond BP -15 899.0 892.6 901.6 894.7 3.0 2.4 1.0 0.5 Berry Patch Park: Storm -sewer proposed for Berry Patch Park provides for con- structing a 12" diameter gravity storm sewer outlet from Mooney Lake (Pond JP -7) to Pond. JP -8 and Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9. Both Pond JP -8 and. Pond JP -9 are included within Patrick Eagan Park. Pond JP -7 is abutted by residential homes to the south and east included in Hilltop Estates while to the north and ® west it is abutted by large unplatted parcels. However, the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 which also abut Pilot Knob Road are presently proposed to be developed. Therefore, as part of their development plans, they will also be required to interconnect Pond JP -36 .to Pond JP -35 and Pond JP -35 to Pond JP -7. Pond JP -36 which abuts Pilot Knob Road will receive additional runoff as part of the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road and Deerwood Drive. The lateral storm sewer proposed in Pilot Knob Road will be extended northerly and south- erly from Pond JP -36 and ultimately discharge to Pond JP -36. Therefore, due ito the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, the proposed development of the unplatted parcels west of Pond JP -7 and the current high water elevation flooding park property and trailways, it is necessary to provide an outlet for Pond JP -7 at this time. Design considerations for Pond JP -7 are as follows: Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Comp. Plan Existing b Proposed b Proposed 6 Proposed Proposed Elevation NWL HWL Storage Outflow Pond JP -7 862.8 859.4 865.2 47.6 ac.ft. 1.0 City Hall: Storm sewer proposed at Eagan City Hall includes constructing a storm sewer from the northwesterly corner of Pond JP -6 within an existing open Page 3. 5456d ditch towards City Hall as shown on the attached drawing. Presently, runoff from Pilot Knob Road and a portion of the parking lot at City Hall is conveyed through this open ditch to Pond JP—G. However, those portions of the ditch which are at a steep grade are beginning to suffer severe erosion. Therefore, due to the additional runoff being directed towards this ditch resulting from the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary to construct storm sewer in those portions of the ditch which are susceptible to erosion. However, be— cause of the uncertainty of how the property south of City Hall will develop, it is proposed to preserve the open ditch where it is constructed at flatter grade and erosion is less a concern. EASEMENTS: Easements will be required for construction of the storm sewer for Hilltop Park and Evergreen Park. Storm sewer for City Hall is constructed on property owned by the City. Therefore., no easements are required. Page 4. 5456d 9/ r1 • Parcel Permanent Temporary Description Easement Easement EVERGREEN PARK Thomas Lake School Addition Lot 1, Block 1 0.18 acre 0.37 acre Thomas Lake Lot 7, Block l 0.06 acre 0.13 acre Lot 8, Block 1 0.07 acre 0.13 acre BERRY PATCH PARK Hilltop Estates Lot 1, Block 1 0.04 acre 0.16 acre Lot 2,, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre Lot 3, Block 1 0.03 acre 0.11 acre SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 015-54 0.06 acre 0.22 acre Parcel 016-54 0.05 acre 0.18 acre Page 4. 5456d 9/ r1 • r , U AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AREA CONSTRUCTION AREA SW 1/4, SECTION 22 NW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 012-26 City of Eagan Parcel 010-51 Parcel 013-26 City of Eagan Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan Parcel 010-53 HILLTOP ESTATES Parcel 012-54 Lot 1, 2, 3, Block 1 Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 012-85 City of Eagan Parcel 010-82 City of Eagan SE 1/4,. SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 SE 1/4 S SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 5456d Page 5. 3v- NE 1/4, SECTION 28 Parcel 010-00 City of Eagan THOMAS LAKE SCHOOL ADDITION Lot 1; Block 1 THOMAS LAKE HEIGHTS ADDN. Lot 7, 8, Block 1 EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 & 28, Blk. 1 Lots 3, 4 S 5, Block 4 Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 21 6 22, Blk. 5 Lots 1 (012), 2, 7, 8 6 9, Block 6 COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is included in Appendix A located at the back of this report. A summary of these costs is listed below: Evergreen Park $162,020 Hilltop Park 68,250 City Hall 39,810 $270,080 The total estimated project cost is $270,080 which includes contingencies and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited • property. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located at the back of this report. All costs are considered trunk, therefore, assess- ments will be levied based on trunk area storm sewer assessment rates in ef- fect at the time of the public hearing. The assessments will be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the.final assessment hearing. Areas benefited from this project will receive trunk area storm sewer as- sessments if they have not been previously assessed. Located at the back of this report is a drawing which shows those areas proposed to be assessed. These areas are proposed to be assessed in accordance with the standard City policy for assessing trunk area storm sewer. It is also proposed to assess Patrick Eagan Park in accordance with assessment rates for regional parks. All costs presented herein are considered trunk costs. 5456d Page 6. J3 TRUNK RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWS Residential $0.050/sq.ft. Large Lot $0.50/sq.ft. (1st 16,500 sq.ft, of ea. ac.) Regional Park $0.02'5/sq.ft. REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project areas follows: Project Cost Revenue Balance • Trunk Storm Sewer $270,080 Trunk Area Assessments $214,402 TOTAL $270,080 $214,402 —$55,678 It is anticipated —$55,678 will be required from the trunk storm sewer fund. It should be noted, however, that $92,355 of revenue is related to the proposed assessment to Patrick Eagan Park and Berry Patch Park which is con— sidered the City of Eagan. PROJECT SCHEDULE ® Present Feasibility Report June 17, 1986 Public Hearing July 15, 1986 Acquire Easements Summer, 1986 Approve Plans and Specifications August, 1986 Receive Bids Sept., 1986 Award Contract Sept., 1986 Construction Completion Spring, 1986 Assessment Hearing Summer, 1987 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May, 1988 Page 7. 54564 3�- APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.. 473 A. EVERGREEN PARK 600 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $36.00/lin.ft. $ 21,600 250 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $32.00/lin.ft. 8,000 250 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 7,000 1,380 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 33,120 • 11 Each Std, MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 12,100 6 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 4,800 1 Each 27" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 1 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $600.00/each 600 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 2 Each Connect RCP to existing RCP @$ $600.00/each 1,200 30 Lin.ft. Water main relocation @ $20.00/lin.ft. 600 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous mixture for patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 15,000 base • 550 Ton Class 5 aggregate @ $5.00/ton 2,750 60 Lin.ft. Concrete curb and gutter @ $12.00/lin.ft. 720 6,000 Sq.yds. Boulevard sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 9,000 0.5 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 400 5456d Total $118,690 +5% Contingencies 5,940 $124,630 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. b Bond Interest 37,390 TOTAL EVERGREEN PARK ADDITION ..................... $162,020 Page 8. 36 • r 1 U B. BERRY PATCH PARK (Pond JP -7 to Pond JP -8 to Pond JP -9) 1,350 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. $ 37,800 2 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/lin.ft. Lin.ft. 2,200 4 Each 12" RCP Flared end w/cstg. @ $500.00/each 3,900 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $4,000.00/L.S. Storm sewer in pl. 4,000 16 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. Std. 1,600 3.0 Acres Seeding @ $800.00/acre Each 2,400 RCP Flared end w/trash Total $ 50,000 Each 21" +5% Contingencies Flared end w/trash 2,500 700 8 Cu.yds. $ 52,500 rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest Sq.yds. 15,750 @ $1.50/sq.yd. TOTAL HILLTOP PARK ................................ $ 68,250 C. CITY HALL 150 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $28.00/lin.ft. 4,200 150 Lin.ft. 21" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 3,900 540 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 12,960 3 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $1,100.00/each 3,300 1 Each 24" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 1 Each 21" RCP Flared end w/trash guard @ $700.00/each 700 8 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $100.00/cu.yd. 800 600 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 900 2.0 Acre Seeding @ $800.00/acre 1,600 Total $ 29,160 +5% Contingencies 1,460 $ 30,620 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. S Bond Interest 9,190 .... TOTAL CITY HALL ................................... $ 39,810 Page 9. 5456d 3(0 Parcel Description SW 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 014-50 Parcel 010-51 Parcel 020-51 Parcel 040-51 Parcel 050-51 Parcel 060-51 Parcel 010-52 Parcel 010-53 Parcel 012-54 Parcel 014-54 Parcel 015-54 Parcel 016-54 Parcel 010-00 (Berry Patch Park) SE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-80 Parcel 010-84 Parcel 011-85 Parcel 011-86 Parcel 012-86 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PILOT KNOB ROAD (EVERGREEN PARK, HILLTOP PARK, CITY HALL) .TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 473 Area. Credit Assessable $0.05/s.f. Total (Sq.ft.) (Sq.ft.) Area (Sq.ft.) Rate Assessment 66,000 0.05/s.f. 206,910 183,990 Large Lot 75,750 $0.05/s.f. $ 3,788 42,790 Large Lot 16,500 0.05/s.f. 825 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 163,360 Large Lot 49,500 0.05/s.f. 2,475 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 161,500 Pond (152,750) 8,750 0.05/s.f. 438 621,335 Pond ( 40,100) 581,235 0.05/s.f. 29,062 217,800 Large Lot 82,500 0.05/s.f. 4,125 110,100 --- 110,100 0.05/s.f. 5,505 202,620 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 209,570 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 3,300 336,000 Pond (236,000) 100,000 0.05/s.f. 5,000 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 $0.05/s.f. 413,820 Future R/W (20%) 331,060 0.05/s.f. 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 206,910 Large Lot 66,000 0.05/s.f. 449,380 Future R/W (202) 359,500 0.05/s.f. TOTAL........................................ SE 1/4 6 NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Patrick Eagan Park 4,391,540 Pond 897,340 3,494,200 Regional Park Page 10. 5456d 37 $0.025 $ 16,552 16,552 3,300 3,300 17,975 $122,047 $ 87,355 E • ,* PATRICK EAGAN PARK PARCEL NO. SE 174, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-78 Parcel 010-79 Parcel 010-81 Parcel 010-82 Parcel 010-83 Parcel 012-85 5456d Page 11. 3e NE 1/4, SECTION 22 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 012-04 POND BP -17 NWL•897.1 HWL• 6� 892.0 /A i 2 2 1 2 23 8 1 24 1 7ID 1 25 1 N 26 - 1 : N 27 j 1 28 POND BP -16 NWL•898.9 H WL• 901.1 N 0 100' 200' _.o_. ... L_ M _ET '010-00 (PARK) POND BP -15 NWL• 892.6 HWL•894.7 ti 7' 7 Z 012 2 v 6 D: 011 3 O 10 4 5 U PROPOSED STORM SEWER POND SP -14 Q NWL• 699.0 O S HWL•901.1 0: ii PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA I F-11 M:: S vzll� FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) WILDERNESS BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1886 FIG. No. I Comm. 49380 MM ti 7' 7 Z 012 2 v 6 D: 011 3 O 10 4 5 U PROPOSED STORM SEWER POND SP -14 Q NWL• 699.0 O S HWL•901.1 0: ii PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS (EVERGREEN PARK) PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA I F-11 M:: S vzll� FUTURE STORM SEWER (PILOT KNOB ROAD) WILDERNESS BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consulting Engineers St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE, 1886 FIG. No. I Comm. 49380 m PATRICK EAGAN PARK — it CITY m MAN Pi (Co. Rd. No. 3 1) LEXINGTON A��� � LEXINGTON WAYI (Co. Rd. N6. 43) 1 1 1 1 1 BERRY PATCH NRR MRK 010-w* ST. JOHN NEUMAN ADOITION lff� j ANN. mill PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSMENTS PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA //-2 BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. Consulting Engineers - St. Paul, Minn. Date:JUNE. 108 FIG. NO. 4 COMM. 48380 11 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. On. G. &mn, uo. P.E. Ckn. R. C. .P.E.. N.br, W. Nwrnr, /l L'. A'rirh A. Gr6doh. P.E. 0 Jm AA C. Am Ffhk, P.L. 7Amnw E. Nop, PE. HWAdA. LrmhrrA. P.E. NAdurd W. f.w. P.E'. NirhuM E. T.,.. Y.E. Nobn G. k' hrnnh,, P.E. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 Engineers & Architects J.m., C. Uhun. P.E. Marvin L. Swwb. P.E. St. Paul, MN 55113 Uun.ld c ur,lrrd,. P.E. Jr..Y A. Ruwdw,, P.E. 612.636.4600 MIA ll.n;.n. P.E. Td Al FVM, P.E. Hhh.rl T Nuuununn. VL N.hrn N, PpyMr. AF.': LWvid U. Lwlum, It E, ALTERNATE REPORT rArmw x'. w,rnrn. Pe. MirhwlC LYnrh, I'.!'. PILOT KNOB ROAD Awr. L. MY.. P.E. (EVERGREEN PARK, BERRY PATCH PARK, CITY HALL) Jumn N. M.l.ml, AE. A'rnnnh P. Andenwr. Y.E. TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Ar„h A. Rmh.nunn, r.l: PROJECT NO. 473 Mur* R. Nul/, P.E. M.&,, C. R.O. A.I.A. FILE NO, 49380 Th..., E. An,w. /•.E. &." L. YrrnF AL. Churn A. &, A9 ., September 2, 1986 Lru M. Purrhl, /ludun M. Glwn ' Suun At. Ebdln DISCUSSION: • Berry Patch Park - As part of the public hearing held on July 15, 1986, resi- dents abutting the proposed alignment for the Mooney Lake outlet expressed their concern relative to the impact of construction adjacent to their proper- ties. As a result, the public hearing was continued and a neighborhood meet- ing was scheduled and held on August 5, 1986. The proposed project was dis- cussed in greater detail and other alternates were discussed in addition to other alternates which were suggested and required additional study. Since the neighborhood meeting, three alternates have been studied in more detail. Alternate I provides for constructing a gravity storm sewer outlet to the east constructed within park property and Berry Ridge Road as shown on the attached drawing. The gravity line within Berry Ridge Road will be 20' to 24' deep for approximately 400'. Although this construction is included entirely within street right-of-way which no easements are anticipated, the depth of cut requires restoration of the entire street surface and southerly boule- vard. The estimated project cost for Alternate I is $109,120 as detailed in Appendix A. Page 1. 7520d Alternate II provides for construction of a lift station and force main constructed in the approximate alignment as Alternate I. The advantage to Al- ternate II is that the cuts in Berry Ridge Road are 5'-7' deep as opposed to 20'-24' deep resulting in less restoration of boulevard and street surface. The estimated project cost for Alternate II is $84,480. The disadvantage to Alternate II is the ongoing operation and maintenance cost for a lift sta- tion. The estimated energy cost for this ..lift station based on it's size and pumping head is $350/year. Additional costs which would be incurred would be routine maintenance and replacement. The third alternative provides for a lift station and force main construc- ted within and through Chatterton Ponds to Pond JP -36 as 'shown on the attached drawing. Also included is a gravity line from Pond JP -36 to Pond JP -37 and to the existing trunk storm sewer located approximately 1/4 mile to the east. The cost of Alternate III is $136,990 which does not include costs associated with easement acquisition that would be incurred. In addition, from an engi- neering standpoint, it was never intended the storm water from this drainage area drain to the west, therefore, the existing storm sewer which it would discharge does not have the required capacity to convey this flow. As a re- • cult, Alternate III is not recommended for consideration. Costs associated with Alternate I, II, III and the amount presented in the original preliminary report are presented below: Alternate I ('Gravity, Berry Ridge Road) Alternate II (Lift Station 6 Force Main, Berry Ridge Rd.) Alternate III (Lift Station 6 Force Main, to West) Preliminary Report (Gravity through Backyards) Page 2. 7520d $109,120 84,480 136,990 68,250 In summary, the alignment proposed in the preliminary report is less cost- ly, however, this cost does not assume any costs associated with easement ac- quisition. Based on comments from the affected residents, it is apparent costs would be incurred for easement acquisition in the event the alignment proposed in the preliminary report was approved. It is anticipated these costs could range between $10,000 and $25,000. Alternate I and II do not re- quire easements, however, they are more costly and will require either a deep gravity sewer or a lift station and force main constructed within Berry Ridge Road. ASSESSMENTS AND REVENUE: Assessment and revenue costs as presented in the preliminary report remain the same. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of Jthe Eta of innesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: September 2, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Page 3.. 7520d APPENDIX A ALTERNATE PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE PILOT KNOB ROAD (BERRY PATCH PARK) TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - PROJECT NO. 473 A.) ALTERNATE I (GRAVITY, BERRY RIDGE ROAD) 600 Lin.ft. 12" RCP, 0'-15' dp. @ $24.00/lin.ft. $ 14,400 470 Lin.ft. 12" RCP, 15'-25' dp. @ $42.00/lin.ft. 19,740 3 Each Std. MH @ $900.00/each 2,700 25 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' deep @ $60.00/lin.ft. 1,500 2 Each 12" RCP FE @ $400.00/each 800 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 480 LUMP SUM Clear 6 grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 1,070 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,070 1,500 Sq.yds. Remove Bituminous Pavement @$2.00/sq.yd. 3,000 490 Lin.ft. Remove concrete curb @ $2.00/lin.ft. 980 240 Lin.ft. Remove ex. storm sewer pipe @ $5.00/lin.ft. 1,200 2 Each Reconstruct ex. CB @ $500.00/each 1,000 80 Lin.ft. Reconstruct ex. sanitary sewer @ $12.00/lin.ft. 960 80 Lin.ft. Reconstruct ex. water main @ $15.00/lin.ft. 1,200 30 Lin.ft. Reconstruct ex. storm sewer pipe @ $12.00/lin.ft. 36 600 Ton Class 5 Aggregate base @ $8.00/ton 4,80 1,500 Sq.yds. Bituminous Mixture for Patch @ $10.00/sq.yd. 15,000 490 Lin.ft. Concrete curb b gutter @ $10'.00/lin.ft. 4,900 1,100 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 1,650 1.2 Acres Seed @ $1,000.00/Ac. 1,200 Total $ 79,940 +5% Contingencies 4,000 $ 83,940 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin., Bond Interest 25,180 TOTALALTERNATE I ................................... $109,120 Page 4. 7520d B.) ALTERNATE II (LIFT STATION b FORCE MAIN BERRY PATCH ROAD 880 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Force main @ $15.00/lin.ft. $ 13,200 130 Lin.ft. 8" DIP Inlet @ $30.00/lin.ft. 3,900 LUMP'SUM Submersible lift station @ $35,000.00/L.S. 35,000 1 Each 8" G.V. S Box @ $600.00/each 600 LUMP SUM Clear & grub trees @ $3,000.00/L.S. 3,000 4 Each Driveway restoration @ $600.00/each 2,400 8 Cu.yds. Rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 480 1,000 Sq.yds. Sod @ $1.50/sq.yd. 1,500 13010 Lin.ft. Trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 1,010 1.0 Acre Seed @ $800.0.0/acre 800 Total $ 61,890 +5% Contingencies 3,100 $ 54,990 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin., Bond Interest 19.490 7520d TOTAL ALTERNATE II .. $ 84,480 Page 5. T 7 010-82 011-85 011-86 016-54 PRELIMINARY REI ALIGNMENT 016-64 014-64 040-61 IF- - 010-83 ND .8 WL - 8192 PATRICK EAGAN PARK HWL-8 0 200' 012-85 \ \ ALTERNATERG-I T STATION & FORCE MAIN) \ ALTERNATEI(GRAVITY SEWER) \\ Ex. STORM SEWER \V 1 1E2 RY NEO 5 2 1 3 . 2 0 4 3 f-- �� 1 6 RRY PATCH P 2 010-00 3 7(MOONEY LAKE) O 4 0\ / POND JP -7 NWL-85QA 5 O P060-51 HWL - 8652 f PLOT KNOB ROAD BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Engineers & Architects ALTERNATEI&Ir ALIGNMENTS l St. Paul, Minnesota PROJECT No. 473 Date: SEPT 1988 EAGAN, MINNESOTA ! Comm. 49380 Fig. No. I Ex. 27" RCP i PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ALTERNATE X ALIGNMENT PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA f� SONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:SEPT., 1988 Comm. 48380 [Fig. N o. 2 otn., r1U n lmnm 060-51 (MOONEY LAKE) 7® POND JP -7 . NWL=859.4 010- I 8 10 II 050-51 HWL-865.2 „ 00 PROPSO ED 8�R4WB I CgNeRY 2 27 26 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED LIFT STATION Existing 28 Storm 3 020-51 Sewer CTO 29 20 4� /;' 26 ESTATES' / 27 5 © 31 19 / 6 PROPOSED 28 —� 32 6" D.I.P. 7 014-50 FORCE MAIN 15- 8 HILLTOP 16 14 2a> OF POND JP -35 13 9 EAGAN NWL=669.4 17 12 10 O • ST. JOHN NEUMANN // 11 18 \ 10 THE �P 2 /) 9 p I / 8 1 K / LJ LJ 7 2 _ POND JP -36 PINES 012-54 NWL=870.6 6 3 I 5 4 W m PILOT K OB ROAD PROPOSED 12" RCP � II 12 ® 7 KNOB N/LL ®� 10 PROPESSION4L 9 8 PARK 0 300, ® SCALE IN FEET 010-75 OUTLO T D Ex. 27" RCP i PILOT KNOB ROAD TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ALTERNATE X ALIGNMENT PROJECT No. 473 EAGAN, MINNESOTA f� SONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date:SEPT., 1988 Comm. 48380 [Fig. N o. 2 0 TO: TOM COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 RE: PROJECT 473 - ADVISORY PARKS do RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed Project 473, and in particular, the alternative report dated September 2nd, 1986, from Mark Hansen at a September 4th Commission meeting. The Commission put in an inordinate amount of time discussing this project and the potential impact on Patrick Eagan Park, along with a number of other • issues. These included:.. water quality, construction disruption, water elevations for J.P. - 8, cost estimates, and of course, desirability, and feasiblity, for surface drainage - at the point at which gravity would cause the water to run to J.P. - 8. In regards to the concept of creating a stream, or brook type amenity to the park, there appeared to be three separate schools_of thought regarding this. (A) We don't need it, and if we do - is this the ideal location?. We can create a stream by way of a re -circulation pump. (B) The concept is unique, but not enough information, or the cost to create a brook is presented. (C) It is a good opportunity to use a resource of water, rather than pipe it underground to the river, let's make use of it. • Generally, the Commission agreed with the report that Alternate 03, force main and gravity to the west, was not cost effective. Alternate #1, the gravity feed through Berry Ridge Road, was also rejected by the Commission. Alternate 02, which is a lift station and force main and the original alternative proposed in the preliminary report, seemed most logical to the majority of the Commission members. There remained several questions unanswered, which the Commission desired more information on. 1. What share in the cost will the County pay in the entire project cost? Due to the the upgrading of the Pilot Knob Road and increased run-off, will the County be responsible for paying a portion of the cost of the storm sewer system? 2. Can the output of the pump for the force main be controlled or throttled back in any way that would insure a longer period of pumping, in order to create a stream, through the park for longer periods of time than the forty- four (44) days now estimated? Would there be any impact of the flooding of Mooney Lake over it's established NOHW, if this were to happen? 3. What is the impact on JP - 8, and a controlled elevation for this pond? 4. What are the alternative costs for surface drainage, i.e., rip -rap, etc. Once water gets to Patrick Eagan Park, could gravity and surface drainage be used? 5. Could the pipe be laid on the surface, rather than at a shallow depth of 3 to 4 feet, once the force main reaches the park? SUMMATION The Advisory Commission was in agreement that the project should move forward with detailed planning. The Commission wished to have further input and review as detailed planning continues, as it relates to impact upon the parks. Additional information relative to impact on Patrick Eagan Park, and review of possible alternatives, i.e., surface drainage and surface piping, were mentioned as issues the Commission wished to look at. Thank you to your attention to these matters. I would be happy to discuss • them with you further and provide you with additional background. i KV/bls cc: Mark Hansen, Bonestroo, Rosen, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. Tom Hedges, City Administrator ,.__� JA-*'/ Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirteen PROJECT 428, KENNEBEC DRIVE - STREETS AND UTILITIES B. Final 'Assessment Hearing for Project .428, Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities --Project 428 provided for the installation of streets and utilities along Kennebec Drive, connecting Blackhawk Road with the Seneca Road/Comanche Drive intersection, in addition to trunk storm sewer improvements. The final assessment hearing for the trunk storm sewer improvements was previously held on March 4, 1986, with the remaining streets and utilities for Kennebec Drive being discussed on September 16. Enclosed on page is a summary of the final assessment roll, ®, showing the relationship of the final assessments to the estimates contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 19, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 428 (Kennebec Drive - Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the certification to the County for collection. 5��_ FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 428 SUBDIVISION/AREAS Cedar Industrial Park — Kennebec Drive FINAL ASSESSHEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. a Feasibility Report . FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area _ Laterals Service n Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM Area 0 Laterals $9.94.FF $17.89/FF FINAL F.R. SANITARY RATES RATES Area Laterals Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS d Gravel Base DX Surfacing Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 5 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $139,939.71 (FR ;171.100) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-5 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 19, 1985 53 $59.27/FF $68.00/FF • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Fourteen PROJECT 429, TOWN CENTRE 70 & 100 ADDITIONS - STREETS AND UTILITIES C. Final Assessment Hearing for Project 429 (Town Centre 70 and 100 Additions - Streets and Utilities) --This project provided for the installation of streets and utilities under City Contracts 85-8 and 85-9, servicing the Town Centre 70, 100, Forest Ridge, and Eagan Convience Center Additions, as well as several unplatted parcels along Duckwood Drive. This is the largest special assessment roll the City has prepared to date. Subsequently, it is a very complex and detailed report. It has been reviewed in detail with the major developer, Federal Land Company. Enclosed on page $� is a summary of the final assessement rates compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on April 16, 1985. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these proposed assessments - ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 429 (Town Centre 70 and 100 - Streets and Utilities) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. O 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 429 SUBDIVISION/AREA: TOWN CENTRE 70 & 100 FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. �z Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES Area T.C. 70 $20.39/F.F. $7574%i]F • LateralsT.C. 100 $19.21/F.F. $28.08/F..F.I Service E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM ®Comm/Ind: $0.072/S.F. $0.072/S.F. Area Residential:$0.061/S.F. $0.061/S.F. Laterals SANITARY E] Area T.C. 70 CD Laterals T.C. 100 Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk FINAL F.R. RATES RATES $ 4.06—FF —F $1T. TFBF, $1129/F.F. $16.90/F.F. STREETS Duckwood: $2.72 �X Gravel Base Denmark: $19.21 T.C. 70 :$39..96 O Surfacing T.C. 100:$53.18 MSAS: $60.15 E] Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 37 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 9% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $2,611,036.31 (F.R. = $3,666,734) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-8, 85-9 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: April 16, 1985 ,5A $1.33 $7.49' $81.42 8 .O1 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Fifteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING D. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 417, Birchpark Addition - (Streets & Utilities) --Project 417 provided for the installation of streets and utilities servicing the Birchpark Addition and property on the south side of Deerwood Drive under two contracts: 85-9 (Denmark Avenue and Deerwood Drive. surfacing) and 85-10 (internal streets and utilities). Enclosed on page �$is a summary of the final assessment rates and a comparison t45 --the estimated rates contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing • held on September 18, 1984. As a result of that initial public hearing, several property owners along the south side of Deerwood Drive submitted objections and pursued a reduction request through the Special Assessment Committee which was ultimately reviewed by the Council on September 17, 1985. Those final maximum assessment amounts based on benefit received as verified by formal appraisals have been included in this final assessment roll. Although there was an error in the amount identified in the notice of this public hearing, it has been corrected by a subsequent notice to those affected property owners. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and seat to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and to approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 417 (Birchpark Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. 54 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 417 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Birch Park Addition' , FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. FINAL NATER RATES - RATES SANITARY RATES Birch Park: $433,12/Lot $467/Lot Area Section 22:$1120/Acre $1720/Acre ❑ Area X Laterals 11' F.R. RATES $ .87/F.F. $16.47/F.F. J Laterals $14.72/F.F. $17.04/F.F. Service (1) $838.58/Lor $.1064/1.ot ❑ Service 0 Lat. Benefit/Trunk $10.84 /F.F. $10.84/F.F. ❑ Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM Area ® Laterals $12.91/F.F. 513.85/F.F, STREETS ❑ Cravel Base Birch Park: $31.99/F.F. $31.35/F.F. © Surf acinp,Deerwood $30.49/F.F. $,30.49/F.F. Lots: ❑ Res. Equiv. Includes both sanitary sewer and water services. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 80 NUMBER.OF YEARS ASSESSED: 5 RATE OF INTEREST: 99 TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $589;047.08 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-9, 85-10 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: September 18, 1984 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Sixteen iJ kf:VW<TXIf-*W:ik`Ywl-iDKV1CCel-iON*- B. Final Assessment Hearing, Projject 419 (Slaters Acres) -- Project 419 provided for the i'nsta'llation of streets and utilities to service the Slaters Acres, Northern Oaks and unplatted parcels to the south. As indicated at the time of presenting final assessment roll*for the Council's consideration • of scheduling this final_ assessment hearing, cost overruns beyond the feasibility report estimates were identified resulting from unexpected cost increases for easement acquisition and change orders during construction. A detailed analysis of these cost overruns will be provided as part of the administrative packet prior to the hearing on September 16. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has received a written objection from Hilla Construction Company pertaining to a portion of the assessments for sanitary sewer lateral resulting from their request for a change order to lower the elevation to better serve their future developments. The basis of their objections relate to the addition of the City's overhead to actual construction costs for the change order. A meeting has been •scheduled with them for 9:00 a.m. Monday, September 15 to further discuss this issue. A summary of this meeting will also be provided with the administrative packet regarding the overall assessments for this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 419 (Slaters Acres - Streets and Utilities) and authorize certification to the County for collection. *A -copy of -the final assessment roll is enclosed on page. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 419 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Slaters Acres FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. Feasibility Report FINAL F.R. WATER RATES RATES 0 Area ® $ rl.0 F -.F. r -7771-77T. Laterals $2,206.31/Lot $1,850/Lot $6 78.73-7 o —t Lot XD Service $741.69/Lot $280/Lot Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM XI Area $0.045/S.F. $0.045/S.F. Q Laterals $745.77/Lot $837/Lot FINAL F. SANITARY RATES RA Area $ 3.87 F.F. $3.i.7 MX Laterals $5,371.78/Lot $4,133/ ❑ Service Lat. Benefit/Trunk STREETS Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 25 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $342,369.38 CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85-3 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: December 18, 1984 $5,787.20/Lot $4_38 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING F. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 423 (Group W Cable Addition - Streetsj--This project provided for the street surfacing and storm sewer improvements to that portion of Old Sibley Highway providing access to the new Group W Cable Addition Headquarters. The project that was finally approved and constructed was an alternate to the original proposal for project 423 providing for full street construction (curb and gutter with bituminous surfacing) to the northerly limits of the -Group W Cable Addition with bituminous surfacing only to the entrance road of the gas company facility. The original report did not provide for the installation of curb and gutter along the south side adjacent to the unplatted property. However, with the processing of the proposed splashland addition dev-elopment, it was appropriate to modify the report with the alternate providing for full construction as finally assessed. Enclosed on page (o/ is a copy of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the last public hearing held on December 17, 1985 for the alternate project. The ten percent over run for the full street surfacing resulted from ,processing change orders necessary to remove poor subsoil conditions that were not known at the time of the feasibility report estimate. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 423 Alternate (Group W Addition - Streets) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. Ly WATER FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 423 - ALT SUBDIVISION/AREA: Group W Addition FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report: No. 423 - Alternate (As Bid) FINAL F.R. FINAL RATES RATES SANITARY RATES F. R. RATES STORM STREETS _Q_ AreaGravel Base Laterals D SurfaciT.H. 13 n&Group W $54.41 F.F.(i�$49.64/F.F. Group W — $32.62/F.F. $36.58/F.F. • Res. Equiv. End %(1) Includes storm sewer and ditch work. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 6 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $115.107.75 (F.R = $110,360) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 - 23 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 20, 1984; July 2, 1985• Decemb r 17 19A5 Area Area Laterals 0 Laterals 0 Service Service El Lat. Benefit/Trunk Lac. Benefit/Trunk F. R. RATES STORM STREETS _Q_ AreaGravel Base Laterals D SurfaciT.H. 13 n&Group W $54.41 F.F.(i�$49.64/F.F. Group W — $32.62/F.F. $36.58/F.F. • Res. Equiv. End %(1) Includes storm sewer and ditch work. NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 6 NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 10 RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $115.107.75 (F.R = $110,360) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 - 23 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: November 20, 1984; July 2, 1985• Decemb r 17 19A5 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eighteen FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING G. Final Assessment Hearing, Project 4'33,(Lexington Square 2nd Addition - Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer) --Project 433 provided for the extension of the trunk sanitary and storm sewer facilities • through the Lexington Square 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page d.� is a summary of the final assessment rates as compared to those estimated in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on May 7, 1985. All notices ,have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. As of this date, the staff has not received any formal objections to these proposed assessments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/modify the final assessment roll for Project 433 (Lexington Square 2nd Addition - Trunk Storm and Sanitary Sewer) and authorize the certification to the County for collection. 62-- FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT NO: 433 SUBDIVISION/AREA: Lexington Square 2nd & 3rd Additions FINAL ASSESSMEENT HEARING: September 16, 1986 IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED: F. R. = Feasibility Report FINAL F.R.- WATER RATES RATES Area Laterals 0 Service " E] Lat. Benefit/Trunk STORM ® Area 0.048/sf $0.048/sf Laterals �x Lateral$359.79/ $383/lot Benefit/Trunk lot STREETS - Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. ` NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 324 •lots., 'S parcels NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 years RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $581,075..68 (feasibility report=$'629,.433) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 20 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 7, 1985 L_ �3 FINAL F. R. SANITARY RATES RATES Q Area $1,190/ac $1,190/ Laterals Service Q Lat. Benefit/Trunk $28.69/ $28.6 Cl foot Cl f STREETS - Gravel Base Surfacing Res. Equiv. ` NUMBER OF PARCELS AFFECTED: 324 •lots., 'S parcels NUMBER OF YEARS ASSESSED: 15 years RATE OF INTEREST: 9.0% TOTAL AMOUNT ASSESSED: $581,075..68 (feasibility report=$'629,.433) CONSTRUCTED UNDER THE FOLLOWING CONTRACTS: 85 20 PUBLIC HEARING DATE: May 7, 1985 L_ �3 • Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen VACATION OF PORTION OF RAGAN INDUSTRIAL ROAD H. Vacation of a Portion of Eagan Industrial Road --On August 19, the Council received a petition and scheduled a public hearing to consider vacating a portion of existing public right-of-way for Eagan Industrial Road a -t its intersection with Eagandale Bou evard as identified by the legal description enclosed on page _. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and s_ent to all utility companies potentially affected by this vacation., As of this date, staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation. The developer and land owner of Lot 3, Block 2 Eagandale Center Industrial Park will be performing the reconstruction of the intersection at their costs as a consideration of this vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Eagan Industrial Road at its intersection with Eagandale Boulevard as legally described. 0 PROPOSED ROAD VACATION SKETCH: EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK �AC'A11 L_ry Jr -Ai V MOST EASTERLY -\ CORNER OF LOT 3 L.LI`I Ph O )j �1 L / 1 T 1r '• N L;.S 9P 5nnde Land Surveying 9001 E ftaom gl Froe�y 05W) Sk o ngb . MN SS470 (9/2) Yl -U" 200-86 KL 1 -F -� moo`` i SOUTH LINE OF LOT 3 -13766 60 C?� 'J Fin r)I� T� REVIEWED BY 0 PROPOSED ROAD VACATION DESCRIPTION That part of Eagan Industrial Road as dedicated on EAGANDALE CENTER INDUST- RIAL PARK, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, described as commencing at the most easterly corner of Lot 3, Block 2 of said EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK; thence southwesterly along the south- easterly line of said Lot 3 to the southeast corner of said Lot 3, being the point of beginning of the property to be described; thence continuing southwesterly along the southwesterly extension of said southeast line of Lot 3, a distance of 64.07 feet; thence westerly a distance of 37.70 feet along a tangential curve concave to the north having a radius of 24.00 feet and a central: angle of 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; thence northwesterly, tan- gent to said curve, a distance of 81.80 feet to the south line of said Lot 3; thence easterly, along said south line of Lot 3 a distance of 137.66 feet to the point of beginning. EDENOTES ROAD TO BE VACATED SCALE: 111 -100' Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty PROPOSED 1987 GENERAL FUND BUDGET I. Public Hearing for Proposed 1981 General Operating Budget -- Preparation of a draft 1987 budget was completed, by all departments of the City in early August. During the month of August the City Administrator revised all departmental budgets and presented a balanced budget for review and consideration at a special City Council meeting/budget workshop that was held on August 28. At that meeting all budgets were reviewed. After much deliberation the City Administrator was given guidelines to reduce the budget to avoid a mill levy increase in 1987. Budget revisions were made and a second budget workshop session was held on Monday, September B to review the impact of City Council and City Administration budgetary adjustments. The total budget being considered for 1987 is $7,389,630. The City Administrator will have a budget information packet ready for distribution at the meeting on Tuesday and also overheads for a formal presentation. The presentation will be brief unless there are residents in the audience who would like additional information . and an understanding of the general fund budget. There is no action to be required on this item. The purpose for holding a public hearing to .consider the general fund budget for the next calendar year is to allow public input and discussion on certain programs and services that are offered by their local government. At the October 7 City Council meeting the mill levy certification will be discussed and more than likely acted upon for certification to the County. This action will certify the amount of taxes to be collected in 1987 which is the largest, revenue source for the operating budget. The final expenditures and operating budget will be acted on later this fall after the City Council have reviewed all public enterprise accounts consisting of water, sewer and street lighting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept public input and provide an appropriate direction to the City Administrator regarding further development of the operating budget. Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Ane CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/LIQUOR LICENSE FOR COMPRI HOTEL A. Conditional Use Permit for a Liquor License for the Compri Hotel --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their July 29, 1986 meeting to consider an application for a conditional use permit to allow liquor for the Compri Hotel in an R.B. Planned Development. This item was placed on the August 19 City Council agenda, however, at the request of the developer, the item was continued- until the September 16 City Council agenda. The APC is recommending approval of this condi- tional use permit. For a copy of the staff report,, refer to pages through /67 For action.. that was taken by the Advisory Planning Comfnission, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page 7� ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application as submitted. 47 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICANT: PRISM HOTEL MANAGEMENT COMPANY LOCATION: LOTS 1, 2, & 3, BLOCK 1 OF EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK, OUTLOT A OF EAGANDALE OFFICE EXISTING ZONING: RB - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PARK DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JULY 29, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: JULY 21, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUBMITTED: An application has been submitted request- ing a conditional use permit to allow liquor for the Compri Hotel in an RB-- Planned Development. COMMENTS': At the June 24, 1986 Advisory Planning Commission meeting, the APC reviewed and approved the preliminary plat and detailed site plan for a Prism hotel. This hotel ,contained 190 rooms and was to be six stories in height. It was noted at the June 24 meeting, that the applicants had made an applica- tion or would be making an application for a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor at this facility. 'At the July 15, 1986 City Council meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved' the preliminary plat of the Compri Hotel and the zoning to the RB type commercial planned development. At this meeting, the City Council had concerns regarding the liquor license portion even though the liquor license was hot - under consideration at that time. It was clearly indicated to the applicants, that with a detached restaurant and hotel, one liquor license would be all that would be allowed for that site, therefore, the applicants are aware of the Council's concern regarding the liquor license criteria. The application submitted is only the portion that requires the public hearing process for a conditional use permit. The roadside business portion would allow on -sale liquor as a permitted use, however, the planned development does not specifically spell out on -sale liquor as a permitted use and this public hearing will clarify that the applicants are proposing on sale liquor for the hotel in this planned development. The liquor -license criteria will be a separate issue that the City Council will deal with, in regard to the number of licenses and .where they will be located. CONDITIONS 1) All City ordinances shall be adhered to. m 0 0 4L tCOMPRI ROTE OPUS CORPORATION SLAJ� r� APC Minutes July 29, 1986 EAGANDALE OFFICE CENTER - PHASE TWO - SITE PLAN REVIEW A site plan review for Eagandale Office Center, Phase Two, located in the northwest quarter of Section 3, in the northeast quadrant of Pilot Knob Road and Avalon Avenue was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Mr. Runkle introduced the application. Mr. David Hunt, project manager for Opus, was present to represent the applicant. No appearances were made on behalf of the public. Discussion centered around the fact that the parking area consisted of 315 parking spaces versus the 380 required under the ordinance. City Planner Runkle advised that the area did provide more than required green space which would be available for additional parking if required. Member Hall indicated that the parking requirement for office buildings in the City of Eagan was high in relation to other cities where in many cases, one space for 200 square feet of net rentable area were required, as opposed to one for 150 square feet of gross area. Hall moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend approval of the site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. All standard engineering conditions shall be complied with. 2. All conditions of the Eagan Office Park Planned Development shall be complied with. 3. Staff review of the adequacy of parking prior to phase 4 of the development: -nn All voted yea. PRISM HOTEL MANAGEMENT COMPANY - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairperson McCrea then called the public hearing in regard to Prism Hotel Management Company's request for conditional use permit for a liquor license • for the Compri Hotel located on Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park, and Outlot A of Eagandale Office Park, in that part of the northwest quarter of Section 3, south of I-494 and east of Pilot Knob Road. Mr. Dale Runkle introduced the application indicating that the request merely was to determine the appropriateness of the conditional use permit for on -sale liquor within the hotel in the City of Eagan. The applicant was represented. There were no comments from the public. Hall moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend that the conditional use permit for on -sale liquor in the hotel within this PUD is appropriate. All voted in favor. FREDERICK DeLOSH - REZONING Chairperson McCrea next called the public hearing for rezoning from R-1 (Single Family) to A (Agricultural) property owned by Mr. Frederick DeLosh of approximately 13.45 acres located in part of the south half of Section 4, west - of Pilot Knob Road and north of Lone Oak Road. City Planner Runkle described the application as one for rezoning from R-1 to Agricultural, to continue the ability to stable horses on the site. Mr. Frederick DeLosh was present and Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Two BOW AND ARROW HUNTING SEASON A. Bow and Arrow Hunting Season Clarification --The City Administrator was contacted by John Parker, area wildlife manager for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, who is recom- mending that the City of Eagan permit bow and arrow deer hunting this season. The ordinance was amended on November 9, 1984,. to allow for the use of bow and arrow under certain circumstances. The ordinance reads as follows: "'It is unlawful for any person to shoot a bow and arrow except in the physical education program • in a school supervised by a member of its faculty, a community wide supervised class. or event specifically authorized by the Chief of Police, or a bow and arrow range, or by any person participating in a special bow and arrow hunting season, which season may not conflict with state law or regulations established by the Council for the purpose of wildlife management, or such other place during such time or times as authorized by the Council. This special bow and arrow deer season for the southeast Minnesota and special metro area is September 13 through December 31. All of Eagan is included in a bonus bow hunt which allows a licensed hunter to take a second deer by bow and arrow. The Police Department is prepared to authorize the bow and arrow hunt according to City Ordinance during the time frame as set forth by the DNR. The DNR asks that hunters who wish to participate in the special metro area hunt comply with all local ordinances, including obtaining the local permits as may be required. The Police Department would like to control all bow and arrow hunting to ® unplatted areas of no less than five (5) acres. Under the current ordinancea resident who has the bow and arrow deer license could fall a deer on his property in a platted area. Since the ordinance states that the regulations can be designated to another place during such time or times authorized by the Council at direction to the Police Department to hunt in controlled areas, such as unplatted and no less than five acres would be an acceptable interpretation of the ordinance. For additional information on the request by DNR to have a bow and ,arrow hunt in Eagan, a -copy of the metro archery `bonus deer map �y� 'and an outline of the rules and regulations, refer to pages � through T7f . ACTION TO BE CONSIDER -ED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the 1987 bow and arrow season as set forth by DNR and further discuss and consider regulatory language for direction to the Police Department regarding the type of land area that may be authorized for bow and arrow hunters. I/ IrDEPARTMENT 7 �STATE OF PHONE NO. 445-9393 Area Wildlife Office 223 Holmes Street Shakopee, NN 55379 Tom Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, 10 55122 OF NATURAL RESOURCES Subject: Bow and Arrow Deer Hunt for Eagan • Dear 11r. Hedges: FILE September 4, 1986 As we discussed on the telephone today, I would strongly recommend that the City of Began permit Bow. and Arrow Deer Hunting this season. I would also recommend that your shooting regulations be structured to allow as much land as possible to be hunted with a minimum of regulation. You might want to consider lowering the amount of land ownership required from 40 to 10, 20, or 30 acres. I would also recommend that if you must require a city permit that you issue one to each landowner only and allow the landowner to issue subpermits or simply written permission with the master permit number on it. If enforcement is a problem you might consider some sort of back tag with numbers large enough to be read at a distance. I don't think this is necessary, it would be a hindrance to bow hunters, and it should be implemented only as a last resort. The season this year runs from September 13 through December 31. I have enclosed a copy of the season synopsis. Also, this year for the first time a Metro Bonus Archery Deer Zone has been established which includes all of Eagan. This will allow any archer to purchase a second license and take a second (antlerless only) deer within the zone. I have enclosed an information sheet. If I may be of any further help, please let me know. cerel c— on P ker, Area t7ildlife Manager AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 1966 Metro Archery r`.. Bonus Deer Area (within Boundary) LINWOOD 1 � � Rn nrxn 9YRN1 I iOLN LROYL I uxvT ANOM CO. COLUreus 1 ,YMV.[ X•Y L[FI I(ERNST LANE 'E. SCA". •OR(g1 L.nC I. 1 I na- • Crow River ..IT DF 'F '• IIXe L•[fl •••Ixt L x. YruG c00x unm IN C[N IF FVIL L[ ue♦ [L(IY( X u40 N.FOv[S uuxcrox Luu(rlus WASHINGTON CO. L•[INnILO Co FCOUN xoLl Gmv[ Ouee 11 NOu.. LxO [[YIn n DeIIw PLEB A CHALIN IL(R YIIY FOIIX 3 511[Lrv.I Ev OC[re•O Poem 13 O•NS M1NIII NEAR HENNEPIN CO. SAOOYLSA xv ` RIGHTS I'( GRANT .{ --. CENTS. bu..... RIGHT[ � A C SILL '.L a1S t M QLO Ffrro OU ANDY. V ]e 02 STI LTu .1. 14 Awl .... IT Nmlx. nrNDmx xOIL to ml ural O N4 n[n.Ix IO![YRLI AFRO• [i. 144E a Y fill Irk cVA oliii LOAD Lle Lr a N.rtn oo0 Ly-lRADELI ii YO Gp a.a^WN e AR • I p /Est 6 V o[oxD GAr AI � I RAMSET CO. �; "K ELAND II aroF xIFF[I [IHRr I NIFFllOF4 Lr. IOYTt e11111T r1YL 1 31 L4F [I A HOLLYWOOD wArf RlpWN 9 FD PARR ®NIMM[VOL4' -As] I1 [[I x.Y[G OIIIGi 1 Lr�J1 4 _ T. [ROIL 9[E N _ — ii✓, ONIIIC. OS TOWN 19 FMOOOSY Rr 4ROG3 4Y1• 1 PAUL rLfRNNxYI II- RICHFIELD EE1101i. [IIL6 XIx FLFI Tlour C1011 CNENNNISfX M(FD1N AU I [ ' C..DEN I 'XACONI. LEXETO I [DIN PARA" N•COxu S.. AUL I 9LOONIIDIOM • CXASNA IF Nf R 410Y[ CARVER CO. uc4F ncxn c9nAN[GIDNE DEAN.., 30 T CHASYA DAKOTA CO. touxl xORY10001� i COLO I DANLGREN A•v[r IAAIIIII � I`SDn S41.G[ 1 eUN.IYILL[ 1 TOUNG.NERIC• I eENrON II ATOS HnLI VALLEY [OL[NOYNr Nu-YGfF x4 ET.G r LOYISYILIE LAST xa rlGc( 1 HANCOCK I SAN FRANCISCO CA rfNN11 L10N l IRAYENN.I L SAND CREEK SPRING LANE CRE PRY AN[rlll[ E.NNE I ❑ rage xAM I 1 SCOTT CO. RnELi PARMI.;I.. It NIt t10G Sr, LAWRENCE JORDAN I ® 1 NILES 5 10 is ]D ], Instructions on Reverse Side 1 .*" rOF 9 ANOUNONAA I) nlcoR xn9xtl ]e OIII THE[ -/ 2 3 OROF l0 IOS91F LANE le xIFIol. ]e WHITE YEAR 0 /J ] 1... I V 9[4[x 11 noxi IRE[ 1uN I9 DART CL ]3 wNrtO SEAN H IST.'l oll Ix Y. L DI n. ]0 DI(Y ALL 3e unaRr a ucn uo9 14 Nnuor 21 MILLWOO 39 RLI PAUL e =1=41.O IG IT Um• xU9xn n FIAT OOo TO OAK LAND IN .U. NTI 3 Sea%ue le LA ur.ILE ]] PTF[ OMIDI 31 1 MANY AXONT e N[OI CIn LUL le uuO... uf 24 MExroYtel 32 rt, MANY tour ' Information pertaining to the Metro Bonus Bow Deer Area 1. Special bonus licenses are available at the County Auditor Office of Dakota, Scott, Carver, Hennepin, Anoka, and Washington Counties and from the DNR License Bureau at 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-4026. 2. To purchase the bonus license, the hunter must present his/her general archery license. 3. No bonus licenses will be issued after November 7, 1986. 4. Only Antlerless deer may be taken with the bonus license. 5. Hunters who wish to participate in this hunt must obtain per- mission to hunt on private lands and must comply with all local ordinances, including obtaining any 'local permits that may be required. • 6. The Metro Bonus Bow Deer License allows an archer to take and tag a second deer only within the Metro Bonus Bow Area shown on the attached map. • 7. The bonus Metro License will be valid for those hunters drawn to participate in the Special Hunt Areas of Louisville Swamp, Crow -Hassan Park Reserve, Murphy-Hanrehan Park Reserve, and Fort Snelling State Park. 8. No person may tag more than 2 deer in any calendar year. 9. No person may hunt deer by any means in firearms Zone 1 who has any bonus license. 10. Metro Bonus Bow deer must be registered at a registration station within the seven -county Metropolitan Area. 7� .. lass .� _ _.. •,. _.._.., . BOW & ARROW DEER SEASON SHOOTING HOURS — OnehaH hour before.nriee foams, NOTE: All Ikensed bide game hunter who Ne hunting with bow and arrow Jell have their boon unstrung or eased during the time they are licerued to asks big game while lin the field between M1 minutes eft. the close of shooting hours and 30 minutes before the start of shooting hours, daily. TM 30 musus perusal before and after shooting hours b not extra hunting vans. — No IiPamlld bow bunter that oagp any elevated clear stand between pause, and ono hour before sonris. LICENSING RESTRICTIONS — — A liken. to vke diver by amber, issued alter Me opening of the ar- chery dear season Is not valid until the fifth deny altar It is issued. — No livenns, to .it. deo may be issued alter November g, 1986 except for bonus deer in Special Permit Arm. BOW SEASON ZONES DAYS OPEN SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA Than tart of Zone 4 south of Ow Sept. 1".h. 30, high.." from Fargo. St. Cloud rish...,excap 11494 am Stn. Hwy. 331 .n NOTE Mb.. NORTHERN MINNESOTA All of Zone l plus that, port of Sept. 13 - Dec. T Zane 2 north of State Hay. SS either roc, except and that Pass M Zone 4 earth of w NOTE bsi highways from Forest to St. Cloud 1194 mal Star. Hwy. 231 SOUTHEASTMINNESOTA All of Zone 3 ales that part of Zone Z Sept. 13. Dec. 31, south of hghway. from St. Cloud .itbr sex, except to Taylor Falls (Stata Hwy., 95 and 23) tr NOTE below. NOTE: Bow hunting for either sex Permitted. except that only legal bucks may be taken within a regular firearms zone when there is a regular fire- arms coach open therein, except for bonus licenses or as othemus, zi ellically authorized. Where an area is closed to firearms hunting within e Rrserms zone that I. open, bow and arrow hunter are nlll limited to buck. only hunting within the area closed to firearms. BONUS BOW HUNT —Special Metro Area — A bonus (second) bow and arrow dor license may W purchased to take a second deer by bow and arrowwithin certain Parts of the.ven coun- W Metro Are. — Hunters who wish to Participate In this hunt must obtain Permission to hunt on private lend (a, usual) and must comply with all local ordi- nances. including obtaining any local permits that may be, required (as .el). — Lken es, a map of the Metro Bow Area boundery, and Woial instruc. tion, aro ..liable at the Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Scott am Washington County Auditor's offices, eM from the DNR Licen. Bureau at 500 lafaye at Road, Sr. Paul. For additional information, wrist Metro Bonus Bow Hunt, Carlos Avery Game Form, Forest Lek., MN 55025. OTHER BONUS BOW HUNTS — Sea Bonus Dor Regulations — Panel. 1112. 13 STATE GAME REFUGES OPEN ONLY TO _ BQW AND ARROW HUNTING OF DEER AND BEAR NOTE: Most gems refuges contain privately owned IoM upon which the right to hunt III open) may be prohibited by the landowner. Unit County Unit County Bemkill Beltreml Polk -Clearwater Polk and Claremont Dodge Clearwater Goss Lake Crow Wing Sstlstons Pine East Minnesota Blue Earth Schoolcralt Hub0.rd ISept. 13-0e. 31 only) and L,Su.r (Sept. 13 -Ott. 31 only) Hiawatha Plp.tona Stillwater Washington Paul Bunyan Hubbard St. Croix River Washlngvn Waraz 13-00. 31 only) Swan Lake#1 fil Pine County Pine )only alter Scow sea.nl Units 1, 2, 3 — Also He Game Refugn lived. open on Panel 19. SPECIAL AREAS OPEN TO HUNTING DEER WITH BOW ONLY BY PERMIT PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS - - Appllcestion for a special bow hunt ere& permit must be made on a form supplied eeperrmly by ash sp vial bow hunt area. No other form of application will be accepted. — Send your request for the application farm with a stomped, self. addressed busin.s envelops to the ack ren Ihted for the special bow hunter. where you wish to hunt. SPECIAL BOW PERMIT AREAS OPEN _ Camp RIpM-Cavils announced separately. a Fort Snallirg Sute Park and Mlnnmv Valley NW R — see panel 24. Lake Louise State Park in Mower County is open to either -.x dor hunting by bow. Hunt.. may apply up to September R. 1985. Twenty -live (251 pomiv will be issued for the Period November 13.1 B. Bonus Over licensee will be available, sew panels 11-12. Radium" for application forme should aggless b addressed to Lake Louie Hunt, DNR Headquarters, 2300 Silver Geek Road NE. Rochester. MN 55904. • Loulallle Swamp Unit and Carver Rapids State Weyslde in Scott County ere open to either sex deer hunting except during the firearms.aeon when only legal butte may m taken. An unlimited number of permits will be Issued. There Is no deadline for applications. inquiries should be addressed to Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge, 4101 East 80th St., Bloom Ington, MN 5542). Redyorenp clothing requirement must be met Nov. &16 and Nov. 22-28. • Crow -Haran Park Reserve in Hennepin County, it open to either sex den low hunting. Hunters may apply up to Sept. 8. 1986. Two hundred (200) Permits will De iewed for Nov. 1416. The orange/red clothing requirement of the firearms season must W mat. Requ.v for application forms should be addressed to Hennepin Parks How Hum, 3880 County Roel 24, Maple Plein, MN 55369. • Munphy'flanreh.n Park Become in Scott County is upon to Gilmer sax dear hunting. Hunte. inky apply up to Hep,. 8, 1986, Two hundred 12001 per- mits will be issued for Nov. 1416. The orange/red clothing requirement must be mat. Rryuens for application forms should bar adressN to - Hennepin Parks Saw Hunt. 3880 County Road 24, Maple Plain, MN 55369. •Metro Bonus Baw Llcan.s are with for pannl"hs In these hunts. 14 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 19'86, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Three WAIVER OF PLAT/MWCC B_ Waiver of Plat to Split a 5..36 Acre' Parcel for the MWCC-- A, public hearing was held -,before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider a waiver of plat for 5.36 acres from a 32 acre parcel on the Cedar Industrial Park. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages _Z/ through For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page) • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the waiver of plat for a_5.36 acre tract from a 32 .acre ,parcel as requested by the MWCC,. 7� CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION LOCATION: TRACT "C" NW h, SECTION 17 EXISTING ZONING: L1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 26, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 15,, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Waiver of Plat for" 5.36 acres from a -32 acre parcel in the Cedar Industrial Park. This site is located west of the intersec- tion of Blackhawk Road and Kennebec Drive. A building permit was issued in 1985 for this 33,000 sq. ft. maintenance facility. On October 1, 1985, the City Council denied a request to calculate user fees on a 5.5 acre area instead of the entire 32 acre parcel. The Waiver of Plat will create two separate legal descriptions with the fees (road user, water treatment surcharge, and parks dedication) for. the 5.36 acres due at the time of building occupancy. The remaining portion of Tract "C" will be subject to the same fee requirements at the time development occurs. . CONDITIONS: 1. All applicable Ordinances be adhered to. 2. This Waiver of Plat be subject to a parks dedication fee. 7� " •. E n�lla i )gFI1YFM FICIL III W.CF l ,r` .o � �[ � y u'•_ Ina /-w JR-1 eUFRrlM't •. / 1 / ' For SCALE;.1200' i 1.:.........l::µ:. 1Y•I li:� u::ei :r.`I •e::.::.: a nr»•u :. i� n.ea�u:.:a 1..�, � twuu.i:ny � . Ln. DWYRR i ASSOCIATES. INC. - Mown. I ` BOUNDARY SURVEY Y�•�1.e���Y cr ,' TRXT' C. j %c / . /• .. / / ,�} / 941e,09,T[Y 64S9Ym • I �• �t f .�• / , _ - - ____'� SEX ..il•2D 9t N L 5 929. /'/ RlOR91D1I0IVIiIX•d[• . r DEMDRt mIl01M 11C li { F1 . \�\\ -\ ,�° - .;; �['_ A!1(� L. � �:.:.1 •:::::wl.:. ::: s..::1°::n•1: w a.• :: �:N :::.,,v:�• / 1 / ' For SCALE;.1200' i 1.:.........l::µ:. 1Y•I li:� u::ei :r.`I •e::.::.: a nr»•u :. i� n.ea�u:.:a 1..�, � twuu.i:ny � . Ln. DWYRR i ASSOCIATES. INC. - Mown. I ` BOUNDARY SURVEY Y�•�1.e���Y cr ,' APC Minutes August 26, 1986 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing based upon the application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for a waiver of plat to split 5.36 acres from a 32 acre parcel known as Tract"C" located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 17, west of Highway #13, northwest of Comanche Road, was next convened.by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle provided information regarding compliance with ordinances and the impact .on assessments. There was no appearance from the public. Hall moved., Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the followinig: 1. All applicable Ordinances shall be adhered to. 2. The Waiver of Plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. Those in favor were McCrea, Trygg, Hall, Wilkins and Bohne; those against • were Harrison and Voracek. KILLDEER ADDITION - MICHAEL WILLS - REZONING Chairperson McCrea commenced the public hearing in regard to the request for rezoning from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single Family) for Lots 6 through 13, Block 1, Killdeer Addition, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #49 abutting Joyce Court. Mr. Runkle presentedthe application indicating that the previously platted duplex lots would be rezoned providing single family parcels, consisting of two duplex lots each. Mr. Michael Wills was present on behalf of his mother, and there were no appearances from the public. Harrison moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to compliance with all R-1 Code requirements. All voted yea. • APPLEBAUM FOOD MARKET, INC. (RAINBOW) - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT After an introduction by City Planner Runkle and discussion with Assistant City Attorney David Keller, it appeared that a conditional use permit was not required for the Rainbow Food Store located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Center 70 2nd Addition pursuant to City Ordinance Section 11.20, subd.'12.B.2. Off Sale Liquor, noting it is a permitted use in a CSC (Community Shopping Center.) McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend a refund of the conditional use permit application fee. All voted yes. t' 7 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Four Memo, City Council Meeting REZONING/KILLDEERADDITION C.. Rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for Lot 6-13, Block 1, Killdeer Addition --A public hearing was held at the ,Advisory Planning Commission meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider a rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for certain lots in Block 1, Killdeer Addition. Action was taken by the APC to recommend approval of the rezoning,. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineer ng Department report, a copy is enclosed on pages �y through For a copy of the APC action on this item, refer to page( ACTION TO BE CONSIDEREDONTHIS ITEM: To approve rezoning from R-2 to R-1 for the Killdeer Addition. or deny the CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: REZONING APPLICANT: MICHAEL R WILLS LOCATION: LOTS 6-13, BLOCK 1, KILLDEER ADDN. (NE 1/4,SEC. 12) EXISTING ZONING: R-2, (DOUBLE) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 26, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 13,.1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT • APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by three separate property owners requesting a rezoning from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single Family) on Lots 6-13 in the Killdeer Addition. An amendment to the Comprehensive Guide Plan will not be necessary since this area is designated as R-1. COMMENTS: The other .lots along Joyce Court (1-3 and 14-17) are zoned for single family dwellings. To the south. is another large single family lot and the R-2 Selmark Addition. West of Lot 6 is a NB (Neighborhood Business) district. The proposed lots have been stubbed for utilities. All proposed lots will exceed the minimum frontage requirements for R-1 lots and the square footages will be (6-7) 22,000 s.f., (8-9) 17,050 s.f., (10-11) 15,600 s.f., and (12-13) 24,700 s.f. ® The 3 property owners have signed the application along with a notary public. If approved, this rezoning shall be subject to all R-1 Code requirements. 5( . • N .1 II I\\ I A\ 11 _ I •^-{,�P�k fit. • 1 �•I� _ \ ,R 4 L1 !?3 - • _ JV OV I 1 � I 1 0 114.3- I W I I N 1 2. 0 - 9 -, N 14,300S.F r- 100-- r-90--I r--150— — i %-675- 49,9 �— — —---i90---- -- I I I \ I I 114.3 1 a 17 II _ 16 �� 15 I I -I - I I5,000S.F. I 13, 9005. F. I w,S00S.F.. 14 \ \ 4 1 a 3. i, 1 I I , -70 --/ / ' 2,500 S \ \1 15,3005F } �r 'Bow J L-67- S%48_0 3 R I —,SOJ 0 as 60 _-130 9�.. \ 2s6 — ---J "^--1�—=F I '^ 170 Fy F — — —336— -- Y \ n 59,000 sf. ° 1 5821 1®th N N N e � r APC Minutes August 26, 1986 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION - WAIVER OF PLAT The public hearing based upon the application of the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission for a waiver of plat to split 5.36 acres from a 32 acre parcel known as Tract"C" located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 17, west of Highway #13, northwest of Comanche Road,, was next convened by Chairperson McCrea. Dale Runkle provided information regarding compliance with ordinances and the impact on assessments. There was no appearance from the public. Hall moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the followinig: 1. All applicable Ordinances shall be adhered to. 2. The Waiver of Plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. Those in favor were McCrea, Trygg, Hall, Wilkins and Bohne; those against • were Harrison and Voracek. KILLDEER ADDITION - MICHAEL WILLS - REZONING Chairperson McCrea commenced the public hearing in regard to the request for rezoning from R-2 (Double) to R-1 (Single Family) for Lots 6 through 13, Block 1,, Killdeer Addition, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 12, east of Trunk Highway #49 abutting Joyce Court. Mr. Runkle presented the application indicating that the previously platted duplex lots would be rezoned providing single family parcels, consisting of two duplex lots each. Mr. Michael Wills was present on behalf of his mother, and there were no appearances from the public. Harrison moved, Bohne seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to compliance with all R-1 Code requirements. All voted yea. APPLEBAUM FOOD MARKET, INC. (RAINBOW) - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT After an introduction by City Planner Runkle and discussion with Assistant City Attorney David Keller, it appeared that a conditional use permit was not required for the Rainbow Food Store located on Lot 1, Block 1, Town Center 70 2nd Addition pursuant to City Ordinance Section 11.20, subd. 12.B.2. Off Sale Liquor, noting it is a permitted use in a CSC (Community Shopping Center.) McCrea moved, Trygg seconded the motion to recommend a refund of the conditional use permit application.fee. A11 voted yes. ON 2 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Five Memo, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/TOWN CENTRE 100 - 3RD ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat for Town Centre 100 - 3rd Addition Consisting of Two Lots and Two Outlots on Approximately 2.5 Acres --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider an application submitted by the Federal Land Company requesting a preliminary plat for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2, in the Town Centre 100 - 1st Addition.• It was noted at the Planning Commission meeting that no building 'permits are being proposed with the platting process. This plat would allow an additional acre of land to be added to the daycare facility, in that the lot line was shifted during the fall of 1985. Also,the plat created approximately -a 3 acre parcel that would be dedicated to the City for park purposes. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to a report that was prepared by the Planning and Engineering Department found on pages Q % through Q9 . For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to page(s) C/Q ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or 'deny the preliminary plat as presented for Town Centre 100 - 3rd Addition. • • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TOWN CENTRE 100 THIRD ADDITION APPLICANT: FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: NE4 OF SECTION 15 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - EAGAN HEIGHTS COMMERCIAL PARK DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 26, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 12, 1986 REPORTED BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING DEPTS APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 2 in the Town Centre 100 First Addition. COMMENTS: Lot 1, Block 1 is the Learning Tree Day Care facility located NE of the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Town Centre Drive. This site contains .83 acnes. On September 8, 1985 a Waiver of Plat was approved in order to expand this lot 15' further to the west due to the transmission line along the easterly 24' of the site. Condition number 1 required platting this lot at the time Outlot D was to be platted. The remainder of that outlot will now become Outlot A (13.08 ac). Lot 11 Block 2 is .a 3 acre strip measuring 111' x 1178' abutting the north side of O'Leary Park. Platting this lot along with the • dedication to the City will fulfill a requirement of the Eagan Heights Commercial. Park P.D. Agreement. This park has tentatively been scheduled for development in 1987. The remaining 8.6 acres south of Town Centre Drive will become Outlot .B (8.6 ac). CONDITIONS,: 1) All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. SEE DETAIL N N9•IT 01 t - nr. !.'..-.7'R.AN:1, !i!V/ PLAT- RII M -64C .- ---- H J. i s D, w:7. Y-8 • . 2641.29 •-- - iY'.4 PJ KF_ F_ 0?):7CLE R:7.4 Di X CO. RD. -1111 -- aa --- -.-- 1o2546r -._ +a .,-P. +noo N0. 28 6000 ;._-14s2SU500----sao`IYANKEE, 40.00.:-4pooD00DLE--. ,600p1 ROAD) N, ,zZT,-- r-x�-5z-' •,: I- �ji23a- -.; -610.60- - I�zsa.o0 00 6T0.W A=TOASJ' a, ' l 1N - I- - - _ (. x50.00 ° TOWN CENTRE DRIVE :°J 4q ,..,Br,33Yt 31.97^ I op o se3.16'Is"E LOT 1 W o'o .,I A o -..11600 �j o b "' �m lP4ZP0d'L loop N WATER ELEV.-9,01.4 FL n 5P42!01!'E l"==^ lI`g IF. o •^ a APRIL 26, 198�5OUTLOT A &52.00 va: I 0¢; p: 945.409 -mo iST]Y OUTLOT4op p^ xq= %2 „ em L. t54.21 so42'9'9 R.234.e0 /LRAINA W 696.49 SURVEY 454209 74.00 LE -v 0o -TOWN_."iezei_ _ I n$ LINE ? / ow:: :••]s.6° BLOCK I e OUTLOT �:'y n :::.3300 AMD2 pi0p II 5 ,2'0l� 'R H W P `' // o��� Ne9.1z'S ::-200 $ .J 's +°p. OUTLOT D In SAI > - '753.87- u "'s 1 ( 6 • n :, - 5 a0.0Ddt d•! Daae 6 O _ \ Pr I• IN ,UTILITY o', 1 / f0i98' 311.59 y� \ y 4 p, CURVL G CURVE , - P' ( _ w \ yNQ / �R',''• - -. NeP1151 E'� W Y J •b \NNjI A. 250.59 C'- A•22.5i59' y�R N +' EASEME 1+, -- L. on]a °� 'ate �•': �.� �T/ p 6ruL�'w �6o p�� ao R. se1.a3 1 g L+2]0.59 Pc 49].J6 aa, 0, 1,'-•.•''v 59.10 py 8� p .Nc 9 5P4Yo0t N Hb W E- rn 1 I y7, ^ HF i I V f- �'% as 0\ Ppp\ (f• A"p- 165.- n.- ..9000 OUTLOT, a�.. '^ 5e 21 �' �O C Seri 5f� Iw 549•IY]I'W I nv 2 J i HI -•104.4! nn 3--- - A _••,�, n a K pc>'A F 7c - 0 110_tae _17.n4 i \ A3 253.39 -Q4,= - ioz.�e- - - 405.10 ~ L" A 12 nT i S�� �DRIVE.. 9•D+ ri Z n 1300_1391.95-' ]].00 •��.- .-IJ 0000.33606 W N9 II0W I twart 4sr;� -3300 -CENTRE-Nerrt51E ]]o -o-:-::-' ` efayez�4 - N64.4ri4't A•6T•0S'01'--(((( g56.oa- x5]90 16T'��• L: . ✓ Nor" Go I L. 234.17 25339 •-•"I, ` 52.a�+ Na9•d0dt I CURV[ R.200.0o III - i_ 5 0 ]2 5x34" . n .• �60.a0 .- rd 4V Y" L 143 45 • D �INA9E OUTLOTI B '�i yI� ° WATER ntV•ent n.l w o %O UTLOT C R 23000 - I' W I% b n APRIL II, 1905 • N • H AND IH8 01DRMNA0E AND SuavET LINE I S w dX - UTILITY [ASEMCMT �x y 1 UTILITY NL I r: NB YOgY T. 6 LA SENEMT 0 _ '� - .I --• 1]9252 -•- `'+.Es%r dna.-i02G0:... d: ; _'-660.45... lI' •___ S99.1T09�W - I 0({C1�W:�•:JOr--��N.�( 599.170Y'W'1 ' , I ,DuCICWCiJb \ Or 9 I N Y/f.Y/fl /PaovI YM IL i I 'f 0:4N I ikt I ob OUTLOT A I 8 L \/ 1 II OT I 1 a FJ, NTdN 1 100 I �. ;•,ry ll;a - 16L06K I YI[InA W y I 1 X, CN1VE Y/nYOh 1 fGwN YnYe(i =EN THE w ' FiItST=�----- �. A0011'ION OUTLOT 0 j� •F }_ ,T_1ir z I' T [ LOT 1 •n• BLOCK 2 mru /.nrati i' rrvun ouama Io• a.ral w nm Immo .Y u..ol. r ..1.1 V .rru wo-.ar aY wa.Vr W..Ir .1 tla 1. Ilva�. wa. ea [ V. Valu l rV WVY[ Y W Mlb 1. W .I.a..1 [4rV 111 r1 V1 ml[IYI. a1 I.tl 11 Ira .1 IItlV �ala�aa V Ora. Ytl Y. :1 raaa Wil• tl..l. na.aV b4 11 II.a1Var Irarl. M 4.V. • a [.ra.• ♦In a a:l as YleaaY 1. WIlra fOaY In n.•r uonlu I..Jltl. V . au.u. uuwr .+ ar aa�.Y rar�aa lu rb��ra Y. IIIIN. b. 1. Ilrf 1 L.111 M.1. LUIn tl. au.� • wl.u. y.la..- u.nor r. Ya 1. IIM l IM.11l V.Ia.' I.nnl r. -• 1...1.. .... -: I.Ia....Y. b..l. 1.111.... Y:1a. 1.....l.. r. .arlW.an rla. .1 r,Ylr arm a•.r•Vr _ r .= waw r...r a. w u. rI1Ff.[ Ir W /yr YIMV �aYW M Ir oa Ya .w•a APC Minutes August 26, 1986 TOWN CENTRE 100 THIRD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairperson McCrea then convened the public hearing in regard to the request of Federal Land Company for a preliminary plat consisting of two lots and two outlots on approx-imately 2.5 acres located on Lot 1, Block 1, in Outlot C and D, Town Centre 100 First Addition in part of the northeast quarter of Section 15, south of Yankee Doodle Road, abutting Lexington Avenue. City Planner Runkle presented the application, explaining the need for the small revisions provided. Mr. Charles Bartholdi on behalf of Federal Land Company appeared indicating that the platting was merely a "clean-up" and a waiver of plat was previously requested because of a utility line relative to the day care center and to provide park acreage to the City. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend 'approval of the preliminary plat, subject to compliance with all Code requirements. All voted in.favor. BRITTANY 10TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 REZONING • The next public hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea consisted of a request for preliminary plat and rezoning for 180 single family lots on approximately 98.5 acres with rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) located in part of the northeast quarter of Section 33, east of Beacon Hill Addition, abutting Cliff Road. City Planner Runkle introduced the application indicating that the developer had now requested that the development be completed in two phases with the northerly 40 acres being the 2nd stage. Mr. Bill Mauer of Probe Engineering was present to provide information in regard to the proposed plat, including a 530 foot cul-de-sac variance, which would be the only variance within the proposal, and stated it was necessary due to the 70 foot change in topography. Mr. Rod Hardy of Sienna Corporation was present to discuss the timing and phasing of the project. Mr. Bill Walter of Beacon Hill Addition appeared requesting information • regarding fills and cuts. Mr. Greg Achterling of the Beacon Hill Addition appeared requesting information regarding street variances, regrading of low areas, water tables, and storm sewers. Richard Hefti provided information in regard to the tie in to the storm sewer system which would appear to facilitate the drainage of flood ponds in the Beacon Hill area. Mr. Rod Hardy also commented on the timing necessary in order to obtain such storm sewer facilities. Wilkins moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend a continuance of the public hearing in order to allow a neighborhood meeting to address the many questions presented at the hearing. All voted in favor. �J 3 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Six Memo, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY'PLAT/FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION E. Preliminary Plat for Fairway Hills 2nd Addition Consisting of 59 Single Family Lots on Approximately 25 Acres --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Derrick Land Company for the Fairway Hills 2nd Addition consisting of 59 lots and 25 acres. The APC is recommending approval of the application. For additional information on this item, refer to a report prepared by the Planning and Engineering Department found on pages through • For a copy of the action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to those minutes found on pages /(13 through The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the 2nd Addition and is proposing a cash dedication requirement, a trailway on Pilot Knob Road and further, that all previous condi- tions and agreements for providing the exchange of park land as agreed to in the Fairway Hills lst Addition be adhered to. There were three (3) additional conditions added to the approval of Fairway Hills 2nd Addition by the APC. Those conditions are as follows: 1) Proposed property would be notified of the pipeline easement of record to Williams Brothers Pipeline. 2) The property owners abutting the golf course will be notified of the use and potential impacts of the golf course. 3) The Building Inspection Department will be notified of the pipeline easement on 'Lot 2, Block 1 and special consideration shall be given in order that the building pad does not encroach on this easement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Fairway Hills 2nd Addition as presented. 9/ n LJ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat (Faiiway Hills 2nd Addition) APPLICANT: Derrick Land Company LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: NE a Section 34 R-1 (Single Family) 26 August 1986 14 August•1986 Planning &'Engineering Depts APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Derrick.Land Company requesting a preliminary plat for the Fairway Hills 2nd Addition. The 1st & 2nd Additions consist of 139 lots on 59.67 acres. The 1st Addition received preliminary plat approval on May 6, 1986 and final platting should occur in August or early September 1986. The 2nd Addition consists of 59. lots on 25 acres. The rezoning to R-1 for both additions was approved with the first phase. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment will not be necessary. ZONING & LAND USE: Fairway Hills 2nd Addition is surrounded by the 1st Addition to the north, 15.30 acres of City parkland consisting of a neighborhood park facility and community soccer fields to the south, Parkview Golf Course to the east and Pilot Knob Road to the West. The Northern Natural Gas Company easement passes through the dividing line of the .1st & 2nd Additions and should not create any development problems except for the corner lot (lot 2) abutting the golf course. Even though there is street frontages of 125' & 130' the driveway access should be from the NIS street to eliminate any potential utility connection problems. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant's preliminary grading plan appears feasible as long as Northern Natural Gas Company permits grading within their gas line easement. All grading appears to meet City Code requirements with the exception of the east leg of the first three-way intersection east of Pilot Knob Road across from Delores Lane and the west leg of a three-way. intersection immediately east of this intersection. The west leg of the first intersection has a 68 slope while the east leg of the second intersection has a 38 slope. City Code requires a maximum 28._slope 100' from all street intersections. Staff feels that a variance would be in order for these two segments because this east -west street will be a main roadway for this development. Therefore, this roadway will more than likely be a through street. As such, the 28 flat landing area is not as necessary as it would be for a street where vehicles must stop. The existing topography 7 L FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 would make it extremely difficult to provide the 28 landing area without causing a steeper slope between the two intersections. The applicant's grading plan shows encroachment onto County road right of way. Dakota County is planning to upgrade Pilot Knob Road in 1987 and will undoubtedly do the grading in this area. The applicant's proposed grades reflect the final grades of Pilot Knob Road and it will be the developer's responsibility to coordinate his grading activities with that of the County's. The drainage pattern will remain the same with the drainage being to the north. The storm sewer that the developer is building under the first addition will be extended southerly to collect this runoff. This development shall be responsible for providing a storm sewer outlet to a dry pond that needs to be developed in the park area. UTILITIES: The developer will be extending utilities -of sufficient size, capacity and depth through the Fairway Hills 1st Addition up t to this development. These utilities can then be extended through this development to service it. Staff will recommend that sanitary sewer and water be extended from the south cul-de-sac to the southeast corner of this proposed development. The sanitary sewer line should be at a minimum elevation of 1035 to provide for future service to the parcels to the south. Also, this development shall stub sewer and water to the Parkview Golf Course down the stub street this development provides for. STREETS: The developer will be extending two streets from the Fairway Hills 1st Addition southerly to access this proposed development. The .developer also proposes to access this development off of Pilot Knob Road across from Rebecca Lane and eventually access Pilot Knob Road across from Delores Lane. The Delores Lane connection will not occur until Pilot Knob Road is graded and rebuilt. This alignment and access points are consistent with what the developer orginally proposed during the preliminary platting process for the Fairway Hills Addition. The developer is proposing to stub a street access to the Parkview Golf Course. The developer indicates he does not wish to construct a temporary cul-de-sac at this location and the City does not want the developer to construct a dead-end street. Therefore, the developer suggested curving the street at the intersection of the east -west and north -south street, prepaying the equivalent street assessment for the stubbed street not constructed, and constructing a private driveway to the easterly most lot on that stub street. Staff agrees with this under the condition that the developer enter into an agreement whereby the easterly most lot agrees to maintain the private driveway within public right-of-way and also that the easterly most lot, the lot immediately west and the corner lot across the street enter into an agreement acknowedging the public' right-of-way and the City's right to construct a public street within that right-of-way to the Parkview Golf Course when the golf course develops. FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 3 Because Pilot Knob Road is a minor arterd al within Eagan, City policy requires trailways be constructed along each side. Therefore•, this development will be responsible for an 8' bituminous trailway along the entire frontage of Pilot Knob Road. PERMITS: This development will be responsible for applying and obtaining permits and/or approvals from the following agencies: 1. MPCA - sanitary sewer extension permit. 2. MWCC - sanitary sewer extension approval. 3. Mn Dept of Health - watermain extension permit. 4. Northern Natural Gas - grading within easement permit. 5. Dakota County - work within right-of-way and utility crossing permits. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: This development proposes to dedicate the • City standard 60' right-of-way for internal streets,. This development shall also dedicate a minimum 65' half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road. In order to protect the integrity of the proposed backyard drainage swails adjacent the Northern Natural Gas pipeline, staff- recommends this developer dedicate a minimum of a 40' drainage and utility easement over the backyards of these lots. This easement may be reduced in width if Northern Natural Gas Company allows the drainage swail to be located entirely within their easement rather than being centered on the southerly easement line as the grading plan shows. Likewise, in order to protect the integrity of the backyard drainage swails within the interior block, staff recommends that a 10' drainage easement be dedicated adjacent the rear lot lines as shown on Figure 2. Staff will require a 30' minimum easement width over the sanitary sewer and water main that the developer is required to extend to the southeasterly most corner of this proposed development. Finally, any public utility not located within public right-of-way will require a minimum 20' drainage and utility easement centered over it. Otherwise, this development shall dedicate all other easements• as required by City Code. ASSESSMENTS: This development will be responsible for all assessments outlined in the preliminary report for the Fairway Hills Addition prepared by the Engineering and Planning Departments dated March 17, 1986. For informational purposes, staff is enclosing the Assessment Summary Table and F.igure 2 from that report. Since the overall preliminary report of the Fairway Hills Addition, the developer has swapped land with the Parks Department and obtained more frontage along Pilot Knob Road. Therefore, this development will be responsible for an additional 417' of Pilot Knob Road street improvements at 1/4 the residential equivalent rate and also an 8' 'trailway along this section. The following table summarizes these additional assessments and Figure 3 illustrates them. FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 4 The final assessments will be based upon the rates in effect at the time -of final platting. r� U • 9� , ASSESSMENT SUMMARY TABLE Description 'Est'd Qty 1986 Rate Amounts Co. Rd. Improvements 417 f.f. $ 8.44/f.f. $3,520 Trailway 417 f.f. $11.81/f.f. 4,925 TOTAL $8,445 The final assessments will be based upon the rates in effect at the time -of final platting. r� U • 9� , Page 5 CONDITIONS: FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION 1. A variance to the 28 grades at intersections be granted as discussed within this report. 2. This development shall'extend utilities to its southeasterly most corner and also to the easterly boundary within the right- of-way stub to the Parkview Golf Course. 3. The developer shall provide the necessary documents whereby the owner of Lot 1, adjacent to the golf course and between the public street and the park area, agree to maintain a private driveway within public right-of-way. 4. The developer shall also prepare documents whereby the owner of Lot 1 and 2 of the block adjacent the golf course and between the public street, and also the owner of Lot 2 in the block north of the Northern Natural Gas Company easement and adjacent the golf course, acknowledge the existance of public right-of- way and the right of the City to construct a residential street within that right-of-way upon development of the golf course property. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary regulatory agency permits prior to the City releasing the final plat for recording. 6. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 65' half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and 60' full right-of-ways for internal public roads. 7. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 3.0' utility easement over the sanitary sewer and watermain extended to the southeasterly most corner of this development and a • minimum of a 20' utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. This development will be required to dedicate a 40' drainage easement over the backyards adjacent the Northern Natural Gas pipeline and a 10' drainage easement adjacent to rear lot lines used for drainage swails. This development will be responsible for providing a 30' temporary construction easement along all lots adjacent to Pilot Knob Road north of the Rebecca Lane street extension. 8. This development shall be responsible for the remaining trunk area•, street improvements and trailway assessments not covered by the Fairway Hills 1st Addition. This development shall also be responsible for the additional street and trailway assessments for frontage along Pilot Knob Road as a result of the parkland swap at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. 9. All standard plan conditions shall be adhered to. 10. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks & Rec Commission and subject to /their recommendations. 91 A; 0 PARKVIEWGOLF COURSE 1 i+ I a a • I • � �/ x ) cors.. lane ,Delo p A PAR • w rYr.OM 1 � y. r lYq — / /ter .�x xr n�J /`x /I • .. Nr "� i_ r qnr r Il• ar a r• el'r / �/ r• r Il n' I l• +� +� Y II _ `• 1: rover .+a rou / / / _ ._ •...r• •.. r• 1 1 oceEGLA UNE GENERAL INFORMATION unrwe re+v.�.eucwm•u mru ,ru, q.ur .em w raeroue ,o++•, a-• ..er•elrmu rl.w rd. rt. er. ur. r uO L+u.:"101"1.1.1 u/r wYu. gmrY ur Wlr. rEll .1111 ner .el !el'. .1.111 ee.Ir. wu .-n r+.0 r•Ir ILL u.I I.-" .eu -I' ee .rcua .M +r+u+ l6eal .o. rr. uu Emmem .n+.. Yraurm! •r rr uu.a w!. Road m wa+la+r m rruruur ++o m rury ,o w.0 a. W lu. n.r. nuvui r ueo Loran ENDIN/IIIINO I. COMPANYIo IINC. w WI IliMIt YYru.1. •wYW! lrYr n.rl.wee LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION Nu4 1'•rM ; ��' 'DlRRICIi LAND X00.1 Y. ram PARKVIEW GOLF COURSE \cuu raY GENERAL INFORMATION \.n W\ low•m. Y•aailru. miu \reu I\Xa lmu u/; rllorono \owG •-. unYm lei un: X.1p wI•. n•Y du \. v .u,r \ILuur l01 wuu 1-n rnm \-u .1111016 --I \Wi•\\ .l IY \X.Ya lu\,1 y. pYIYiOY .X rlli\YYY. YO Y\ .Y\LC/ IO GI.W O. IW IW.I Il.t. nae/ I08 I1 6 �r•IYr\i M1\Y/\I l\.. IWrIR\l ENOIN44AINO _ -• COMPANY INC. aT M\ IYI V,Y!'llll•IYXIYi. XYI X\Y-\Ow P� Nru1o\Y u PRELJMINARY GRADING PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND • 7 DEFIRICK LARD CD. a • r / r • • .• a .] Ia 0 / i't , ] ]— r / 1 r - fi r„ ] . eye .r• �. IIiYtY•y 11 1: Xor •.M \aX. / / GENERAL INFORMATION \.n W\ low•m. Y•aailru. miu \reu I\Xa lmu u/; rllorono \owG •-. unYm lei un: X.1p wI•. n•Y du \. v .u,r \ILuur l01 wuu 1-n rnm \-u .1111016 --I \Wi•\\ .l IY \X.Ya lu\,1 y. pYIYiOY .X rlli\YYY. YO Y\ .Y\LC/ IO GI.W O. IW IW.I Il.t. nae/ I08 I1 6 �r•IYr\i M1\Y/\I l\.. IWrIR\l ENOIN44AINO _ -• COMPANY INC. aT M\ IYI V,Y!'llll•IYXIYi. XYI X\Y-\Ow P� Nru1o\Y u PRELJMINARY GRADING PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND • 7 DEFIRICK LARD CD. i / L _ GENERAL •^••. 1.1 1 I. rmr LOIS: 1.1 norouo .ouw . \ u.un ml ISIS: ¢w .o. rl. uou 44 c r .ISIS r.uun wl un: Aeu ..w rwu �-u ALL 4..r LOIS WEST 4 4[m lw W—M 'IAe..o. rt. ............1\. .. IS I.O. r.OL .\ lY L.14fI L.:l. •. yy Y``11 I 1 W W..W.\ A.. r..LY...' .i ..r Lu.AOI \e GA.. SO 1. /iY r4\. L;ca'6.411 IAIN0OMPRNM INC. ON OM a 11.111, "WRL,,,IYll", 11X1 I. OI•I,M "" ro .LOIS r..w I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2N VICINITY MAP . ,1ESt1T R — LOA 1, 1 ' IPARKVIEW GOLF COURSE i J • r s , • r ,. a ,r A 0 / / �•/ r � — J J N — / � / IS I• MeI ..D•!WO I I i / L _ GENERAL •^••. 1.1 1 I. rmr LOIS: 1.1 norouo .ouw . \ u.un ml ISIS: ¢w .o. rl. uou 44 c r .ISIS r.uun wl un: Aeu ..w rwu �-u ALL 4..r LOIS WEST 4 4[m lw W—M 'IAe..o. rt. ............1\. .. IS I.O. r.OL .\ lY L.14fI L.:l. •. yy Y``11 I 1 W W..W.\ A.. r..LY...' .i ..r Lu.AOI \e GA.. SO 1. /iY r4\. L;ca'6.411 IAIN0OMPRNM INC. ON OM a 11.111, "WRL,,,IYll", 11X1 I. OI•I,M "" ro .LOIS r..w I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN OF FAIRWAY HILLS 2N VICINITY MAP . ,1ESt1T R — LOA 1, , I Mims KOS 'bEN1+IClt ulro 1`.fa � Y 1 ' , I Mims KOS 'bEN1+IClt ulro 1`.fa � Y E • I LEGEN D nonimommm�uumm �lTrUfGE �i'KE.�T •••••••• TIZAIL`NAY APC Minutes. August 26, 1986 FAIRWAY HILLS 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT Chairperson McCrea next convened the public hearing in regard to the request of Derrick Land Company for preliminary plat approval consisting of 59 single family lots on approximately- 25 acres, located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 34, at the southeast quadrant of Cliff Road and Pilot Knob Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application which was the second phase of the proposed development, which is now possible because the park area had been defined. Mr. Bill Mauer of Probe Engineering was present to describe the development which actually consisted of 60 single family homes with the total for the two additions being 138 single family homes. Mr. Don Larson of the Parkview Golf Course appeared indicating that the fee owner of the property had been notified in regard to this development, and was concerned for the children and.future homeowners of the lots backing up to the golf course due to stray golf balls and the opportunity for children to wander on to the golf course and into the ponds. There was discussion in regard to liability for any personal injuries or damages to owners of homes in the area, in addition to the ability to build upon a lot which included gas line easement area. Mr. Mauer indicated that the lots adjacent to the golf course would be 142 feet in depth. Mr. Larson recommended that a fence be constructed to keep children out of the golf course. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance to the 2% grades at intersections shall be granted as discussed within this report. 2. This development shall extend utilities to its southeasterly most corner and also to the easterly boundary within the right-of-way stub to the Parkview Golf Course. 3. The developer shall provide the necessary documents whereby the owner of Lot 1, adjacent to the golf course and between the public street and the park area, agree to maintain a private driveway within public right-of-way. 4. The developer shall also prepare documents whereby the owner of Lot 1 and '2 of the block adjacent to the golf course and between the public street, and also the owner of Lot 2 in the block north of the Northern Natural Gas Company easement and adjacent to the golf course, acknowledge the existence of public right-of-way and the right of the City to construct a residential street within that right-of-way upon development of the golf course property. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary regulatory agency permits prior to the City releasing the final plat for recording. 6. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 65 foot half right-of-way for Pilot Knob Road and a 60 foot full right-of-way for internal public roads. • APC Minutes August 26, 1986 . 7. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 30 foot utility . easement over the sanitary sewer and water main extended to the southeasterly most corner of this development and a minimum of a 20 foot utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. This development will be required to dedicate a 40 foot drainage easement over the back yards "adjacent to the Northern Natural 'Gas pipeline and a 10 foot drainage easement adjacent to rear lot lines used for drainage swails. This development will be responsible for providing a 30 foot temporary construction easement along all lots adjacent to Pilot Knob Road north of the Rebecca Lane. street extension. 8. This development shall be responsible for the remaining trunk area, street improvements and trailway assessmenfs.not covered by the Fairway Hills 1st Addition. This development shall also be responsible for the additional street and trailway assessments for frontage along Pilot Knob Road as a result of the parkland swap at the rates in effect at the time of final platting. ® 9. All standard plan conditions shall be adhered to. 10. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and shall be subject to their recommendations. 11. Home buyers shall be notified, by the developer or its agents and assigns of the risks of being adjacent to the golf course and gas line in negotiating for lots adjacent to these facilities. 12. The Building Inspection Department shall closely monitor the construction of the dwelling on the corner lot backing to Parkview Golf Course and across by the gas line easement. All voted yea. • SUNPOINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened was in regard to Sunpointe Addition by Advance Developers consisting of 90 townhouse units on approximately 10.5 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 20, west of Blackhawk Road, abutting Diffley Road. After the public hearing was convened by Chairperson McCrea, City Planner Runkle described the planned phases of this planned development designated for multiple use. Mr.. Robert Carlson was present on behalf of the developer and provided information in regard to the 50 foot buffer between neighboring properties and the description of the units similar to the Southpoint units on the south side of Diffley Road. Mr. John Willenburg of 4068 Magnetite Point appeared objecting to the large area of high density in this particular neighborhood. Mr. Dennis Castle of 1835 Jade Lane appeared requesting information in regard to the planned development. He also proposed a phasing for lower density units in the northern part of the parcel and requested that the City consider additional parks and Erailways. Mr. Randy Raddatz of 4064 Magnetite Point requested /d- 5 Agenda Information September 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Seven Memo, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/SUNPOINTE ADDITION F. Preliminary Plat for Sunpointe Consisting of 90 Townhouse Units on Approximately 10.5 Acres --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider an application from RMC Development and Advance Developers for a preliminary plat entitled Sunpointe Townhouses consisting of 90 townhouse units on 10.5 acres. The APC is recommending approval of the preliminary plat. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report found on pages 1,04 through //y The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending that three addi- tional conditions be added to the approval. Those conditions are as follows: 1) A homeowners association agreement and bylaws be reviewd by the City prior to final approval. 2) The density not be transferred from this development to the outlot or remainder of land to be developed. 3) The buffer area, as stated in the planning development agreement, be provided in accordance with the agreement. For action that was taken by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission, please refer to the Administrative Agenda that will be circulated on Monday. For action that was taken by the Advisory Planning Commission, refer to those minutes found on page(s) ZQ- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS • preliminary plat for Sunpointe on approximately 10.5 acres. ITEM: To approve or deny the consisting of 90 townhouse units /Q m • SUBJECT: APPLICANT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: APPLICATION: CITY OF EAGAN Preliminary Plat (Sunpointe) RMC Development & Advance Developers SW; Section 20 (Multiple) within Eagan Hills West P.D. 26 August, 1986 15 August, 1986 Planning & Engineering Department An application has been submitted requesting a preliminary plat for Sunpointe Townhouses. This plat consists of 90 townhouse units on 10.5 acres on the north side of Diffley Road directly across the road from the existing Southpoint Courtyard Homes. ZONING 6 LAND USE This area of the Eagan Hills West PD is zoned high density or 12+ units per acre. The plat will have an over-all density of 8.6 units per acre. The 10.5 acres will be divided into 9 separate lots, 6 containing 12 unit buildings and 3 with 6 unit buildings. The remaining 44.35 acres will become Outlot A. Adjacent land uses include small agricultural parcels to the east and the Rahn Subdivision to the northeast, the Outlot with similar density to the north and west and the Southpoint homes on the south side of Diffley Road. SITE PLAN/BUILDING DETAILS The, first phase of development will be serviced from the Sunpointe Circle cul-de-sac. This cul-de-sac will connect to the proposed Beaver Dam Road loop extension. The tear drop island in the cul-de-sac will be landscaped and maintained by an association. This association will also be responsible for snow and trash removal. All building/parking setbacks exceed Code requirements. Attached parking is provided for each unit with additional guest space in front of the garage door. The land is primarily rolling grassland with scattered tree stands. The proposed landscape plan will be similar to that across Diffley Road except that the area along Diffley will have an interrupted berm with a variety of plant materials. A11:7 SUNPOINTE APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 The proposed buildings will be the same as the Southpoint Courtyard Homes. Over half of those 48 units were sold in the initial seven weeks of marketing. The low maintenance aluminum siding will come in 3 colors and 3 unit floor plans will be available. These units range in price from the low $60's to high 80's. Amenities include: built in microwaves, oak woodwork, vaulted ceilings, sunken living rooms, main floor laundry areas, private entries, triple glassed windows and redwood decks. Available options include central air conditions with built in humidifiers, fireplaces, water softeners and a security system. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The preliminary grading plan the applicant proposes is feasible and meets all City Codes and requirements. However, the grading will slightly change existing drainage patterns for Pond AP -4 and Pond AP -35. The grading plan proposes to shift this drainage divide .slightly to the northeast, thereby increasing the tributary area to Pond AP -35 by about 2 acres and decreasing the tributary area to Pond AP -4 by the same. This is shown in Figure 1. Staff does not believe this minor change in tributary areas will significantly affect either Pond AP -35 or Pond AP -4. However, neither pond presently has a positive gravity outlet. Both ponds accept runoff from developed areas at the present time. Staff recommends that as a condition of final plat approval the City Council authorize the trunk storm sewer gravity outlet for Pond AP - 4. Although Pond AP -35 is within 1' of the Comprehensive Plan highwater elevation, there is no property adjacent to it which would be adversely affected if this pond floods for the time being. Staff feels it would be more appropriate for further development to occur in order to determine an alignment for the outlet to the west for Pond AP -35. Staff recommends requiring the developer to extend erosion control measures adjacent the entire grading limits that are adjacent to AP - 4. UTILITIES: Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist adjacent this proposed site to provide the necessary service to this proposed development. The applicant proposes on extending an 8" water main north along Beaver Dam Road from the existing 18" water main within Diffley Road. Staff does not feel. the County will allow an open cut on Diffley Road to make this connection. Instead, staff recommends that the developer connect to the existing 18" water main at its southeasterly property corner where the trunk water main is located within the boulevard area. In this case, the developer can extend a 6" line to connect to the 6" line he is proposing to extend from the Art Rahn Addition. At the point where they meet, the line shall be increased to an 8" line and extended westerly to Beaver Dam Road. The applicant proposes on extending the sanitary sewer north along Beaver Dam Road from Diffley Road. The existing sanitary sewer manhole is located near the edge of Diffley Road where the developer proposes to extend Beaver Dam Road to the north. /0 M SUNPOINTE APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 3 This development will have a future problem in obtaining sanitary sewer service to the northwest corner of this development. This area is too low to be serviced from the existing sanitary sewer at Beaver Dam Road. For this area to develop, either a lateral line will have to be constructed from a trunk line in Jade Lane or Rahn Road, or this corner of the development will have to construct their own pumping station. However, this does not affect this particular development. STREETS: This development has access to only one existing street, that being Diffley Road (County Road 30). The preliminary plat proposes to extend Beaver Dam Road north in a "U' -shaped configuration with the other access point being about 7401 west. The westerly access is flexible and need not be exactly determined until such time as the remaining .area of this development develops. The final location of this westerly access point will require ® approval from the Dakota County Highway Department. This development proposes to extend Beaver Dam Road as a 34' (back - of -curb to back -of -curb) width street. However, because of the density proposed and anticipated future high density in this area, staff recommends that the minimum width of this street be 36' face to face. Staff estimates that upon full development, this 60 acres of multi -family residential could generate an average daily traffic volume of about 3,000 vehicles per day. The internal street for this development is a private street. This private street and the private driveways all meet City Code requirements. One of the requirements for this development is that all the private driveways to the buildings shall have concrete curbing, with the private drive having concrete curb and gutter. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The 60' proposed public right-of-way that this development will dedicate for Beaver Dam Roadis adequate. This development has provided the necessary right-of-way for Diffley Road in the form of a highway easement. For clarity purposes, this development shall dedicate this right-of-way on the plat. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' utility easement over the proposed water main and sanitary sewer not located within public right-of-way. This development will also be responsible for dedicatingthe necessary ponding and utility easements for Pond AP -4, along with Pond AP -35, to encompass their respective high water elevations. PERMITS: This development will be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits for the following: 1. Sanitary sewer extension from MPGA. 2. Sanitary sewer extension approval from MWCC. 3. Water main extension from Mn. Dept. of Health. 4., Utility crossing permit from Dakota County. SUNPOINTE APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 4 TRAILWAYS: In updating the Master Trail Plan for the City, staff is proposing a trailway along the north side of Diffley Road. Therefore, it will be this development's responsibility for an 8' trailway along Diffley Road. ASSESSMENTS: According to the City's assessment records, the only trunk related assessment this development is responsible for is, lateral benefit from trunk water main installed within Diffley Road under Project 64. Staff recommends that this development be responsible for its entire frontage along Diffley Road at one-half the lateral benefit from the trunk water main rate in effect at the time of final platting. The benefit from this trunk water main is related to looping for flow and pressure but not direct service. In these instances, staff recommends assessing one-half the regular rate. The assessable footage this development will be responsible for will be the entire frontage along Diff.ley Road less the 60' proposed right-of-way and a 150' corner lot credit at the east and west end. This amounts to approximately 1,6801. The total amount • of lateral benefit from trunk water main this development will be responsible for will be approximately $9,980. The frontage along Cliff Road associated with Block 1 of this development will be due at the time of final platting either by direct payment or assessed by Waiver. This amounts to approximately $4,135 (696' @ $5.94 per front foot) as shown in Figure 2. All remaining costs associated with developing this property, with the exception of trunk' storm sewer, will be the sole responsibility of this development. 0 I°9 CONDITIONS: SUNPOINTE PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. The Council must authorize the construction of a trunk storm sewer outlet to Pond AP -4 prior to final plat approval. 2. The minimum street width shall be 36' for public streets. 3. The internal private street shall have concrete curb and gutter with the internal private drives having concrete curbing. 4. The water main must be connected at the southeast corner of this development. This connection may be made with a 6" main, but where this connection ties into the southerly extension of the 6" main from the Rahn Addition,, it shall be increased to an 8" water main for extension westerly'throughout this site. 5. This development is responsible for obtaining the necessary permits or approvals from MPCA, MWCC, MN Department of Health and the Dakota County Highway Department prior to release of plat documents -for recording. 6. This development will be responsible for an 8' bituminous trailway along..the north side of Diffley Road. 7. This development will be responsible for its lateral benefit from trunk wat-ar•main at one-half the rate in effect at the time of final platting. B. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20' width utility easement over.:all publicly owned utility lines not located within public, right-of-way. 9. This development shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond AP -4 and Pond AP -35. • 10. This development shall also post the south side of the private drive as: "Eire Lane - No Parking" and restrict parking along Beaver Dam Road at all times. 11.. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. All trash must be kept in the individual garages until the day of pick up by one collector. 13. The developer be responsible for the maintenance of the cul-de-sac island. 14. A financial guarantee for the landscaping ensuring proper install- ation and sizes shall not be released until one full year after completion. E Pre&nhw y Pl&t of- SUN POINT for: R M. Q Devel6pment, corp. a Advance Dev , elopersinc. :L �, Ph, /,n \ r— I l� I dr -L, 0 i Vill,' L - rx- 01,� t .j 1� r 2 7- oil— y ;6/ Lr j — — — — -- — — — — — — — -- 2m F 2 w I CmIR slab I. J' T.. W. C—R. W-ENDEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. ST.PA��MTA 5UM 'B�B. �VaiER x899.8 ..-- 1 1 , \ 1 BB9J \ M 895`, r� x.wL.. O I � PDNo x 890, /1 o{,Ra en dl 0 � 12-1 If, 9 x89/.8 Millo B 99 _ `. Broll @-� n r C�p m Aac �\'�' \ 1 /•. .r / a y,� �JI4M miej. \ enxel Sc •On 30 ,{ (DIFFLEY ROAD) d��. •,^ N -"� c.e, m •, �_a rPm. c v .. io ,n I CI Church I > O a .p. m w ¢ SUN _ mF CLIFF -- — Q THIRD ADDITION Preliminary Site Plan of.- SUN POINT RTME for: R.M.C. Development, Corp. 9 lee,m., ex,lll•,.a...,a—c��e..Ary-a•-- ow,w.. zn n• s. a.a•,a �,issL Advance Developers, Inc. N I' T.I..1. Ixs•�.. ••u I. e. e,.,l•,u so w. I•la I6 Ix-w mV:. a, . • stl= ew" u, wu w w. naa mw SCALE. I' . 00' n.R✓ H C. R. WwDEN 6 ASSOCIATES, NQ =1 {w•i•r w u"I •leo 1•Itl Lup R4MIf N1M.Ye { SRE R9O1 Pom PeLLq w 2x - Ite lelll M LW S6 Sil¢Si 2-75 slw w USI . z.9 Ima Ofd 30 a (DIF Church I ala I I SUN I MY CLIFF a THIRD Preliminary Grading, Drainage a Erosion Control Plan of: SUN POINT for: R.M.C. Development, Corp. 9 Advance Developers, Inc. ADDITION N scALE: I'• sa Vortical Col.. - N.G.V.D. 929 7 Proposed Contour Interval Deroles'CUT'Areo Derotn'FILL' Ana DeroteeEn"r f•nu or Eauival enl for Ereelea Control. R...r Y C. R. WPIDEN a ASSMATES, PIC, L1 PL•NN'. "A Yll l 9rE �90x .a sum n�cr ,r. r.u. v..<mr• ,an X 899. B x B9 1 .a I I i • B9o../ I I RD en Q B di o:r dl \\ a Ny B ��\ � _' � \\ Jam/ � /� \ II BDpdNy . . e91. B I I I 'I f� � v �. MJID B r 2T 1 Unil -17 TER i- i '� 12 -UNI ' U _ p t Building u I Wenzel Mmw' •Ot 30 a (DIFFLEY ROAD e, 1 �. =4 M1 Church I > b Ie n= p a 0 I SUN m i - CUFF I o THIRD ADDITION - I Preliminary Utility Loyou! of.- SUN POINT ROTE=eTL:a`4m`� 1•ISMIs p •Illlir Y,�t �•+WE •�-SlJr� for: R.M.C. Development, Corp. 8 N„Ea,,,,m..•,,,,•.�,r,rll�e,..•�.�•d = _ Advance Developers, Inc. Il SCALE: 1' • 50' .. R. WHEN d ASSOCIATES, PSC. L � e ' E art CE9ful E-] ,J 115 Ah � r m p+ibOSP ; :r • t - M 0 0 0 r 'Yi .µII....,I II i t,I . ', i'• - COUNTY---'----_- Ao---i--- \ YUOa:Wro "allI Coln e..Y.hr L�.✓o ADDITION= RECflyEOJOL Lf W . ......r ,.....-... e x _ 22� LATEKAL bENEFIT TP-UNK WATE,CMAIN \k j c ... . \ I � I ':`�`'. ' t' L V. -7- j.7 o ... �•f IF :' y /"•"•r.,,.�. ice.. I•r. O. .I u�l 'y'. r.• .� l� �r x.111 .1. a . •I Q I', n .I. y.ry waFfrti '3... u )* m �f11lll ,LJ � —iiDlfiLE-POPDI- •� ��_;— `•.. J 1 `I 1 v/ � "/_; 4w a I . 1....A I'IyI11 iYX I m; I I QIII 1 j r TNIA 0 ADDITION 1 , I 1 C. R. WINDEN d ASS( 1741 ._ LAIN fLANwrIG SWYEYS ^E .>✓V�... L. ST. PAM, Y SOTA was ._.... ....__......._. Ti .qwq 'M 'WA 11 Rk APC Minutes August 26, 1986 7. This development shall be responsible for dedicating a 30 foot utility easement over the sanitary sewer and water main extended to the southeasterly most corner of this development and a minimum of a 20 foot utility easement over any public utilities not installed within public right-of-way. This development will be required„to; dedicate a.40;foot drainage easement over the back yards adjacent to 'th'e Northern Natural Gas pipeline and a 10 foot drainage easement adjacent to rear lot lines used for drainage swails. This development will be responsible for providing a 30 foot temporary construction easement along all lots adjacent to Pilot Knob Road north of the Rebecca Lane street extension. 8. This development shall be responsible for the remaining trunk area, street improvements and trailway assessmdnts not covered by the Fairway Hills 1st Addition. This development shall also be responsible for the additional street and trailway assessments for frontage along Pilot Knob Road as a result of the parkland swap at the rates in effect at the time -of final platting. 9. All standard plan conditions shall be adhered to. 10. This plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and shall be subject to their recommendations. 11. Home buyers shall be notified by the developer or its agents and assigns of the risks of being adjacent to the golf course and gas line in negotiating for lots adjacent to these facilities. 12. The Building Inspection Department shall closely monitor the construction of the dwelling on the corner lot backing to Parkview Golf Course and across by the gas line easement. All voted yea. &'` SUNPOINTE - PRELIMINARY PLAT The next public hearing convened was in regard to Sunpointe Addition by Advance Developers consisting of 90 townhouse units on approximately 10.5 acres located in part of the southwest quarter of Section 20, west of Blackhawk Road, abutting Diffley Road. After the public hearing was convened by Chairperson McCrea, City Planner Runkle described the planned phases of this planned development designated for multiple use. Mr. Robert Carlson was present on behalf of the developer and provided information in regard to the 50 foot buffer between neighboring properties and the description of the units similar to the Southpoint units on the south side of Diffley Road. Mr. John Willenburg of 4068 Magnetite Point appeared objecting to the large area of high density in this particular neighborhood. Mr. Dennis Castle of 1835 Jade Lane appeared requesting information in regard to the planned development. He also proposed a phasing for lower density units in the northern part of the parcel and requested .that the City consider additional parks and -trailways. Mr. Randy Raddatz of 4064 Magnetite Point requested /ZO 5 APC Minutes August 26, 1986 information in regard to owner/occupancy. Mr. Carlson indicated that VA and FHA loans all require owner/occupancy. Mr. Mark Brown of 1849 Kathryn Circle appeared requesting information in regard to the pond elevation on the eastern portion of the parcel, potential assessments and utility extensions. Ms. Leslie Klein of 4060 Magnetite Point appeared objecting to the number of multi -family homes and apartments in the area and the impact on the values of single family homes. Diane Hasselquist of 1845 Kathryn Circle appeared requesting information regarding assessments. Mr. James Ashworth of 4235 Blackhawk Road expressed concern regard traffic flow. Mrs. Murray Hakala, a Diffley Road resident, appeared requesting information in regard to the buffer to the west of her property. Harrison objected to a piecemeal approach to the development of this portion of the PD. All recommended that a homeowners association be required as a condition' in. addition to the inability to transfer density. There was significant discussion about the problems associated with private tot lots.. Trygg moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Council shall authorize the' construction of a trunk storm sewer outlet to Pond AP -4 prior to final plat approval. 2. The minimum street width shall be 36 feet for public streets. 3. The internal private street shall have.concrete curb and gutter with the internal private drives having concrete curbing. 4. The water main shall be connected at the southeast corner of this development. This connection may be made with a 6 inch main, but where this connection ties into the southerly extension of the 6 inch main from the Rahn Addition, it shall be increased to an 8 inch water main for extension westerly throughout this site. 5. This development shall be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits or approvals from MPCA, MWCC, MN Department of Health and the Dakota County Highway Department prior to release of plat documents for recording. 6. This development shall be responsible for an 8 foot bituminous trailway along the north side of Diffley Road. 7. This development shall be responsible for its lateral benefit from trunk water main at one-half the rate in effect at the time of final platting. 8. This development shall dedicate a minimum 20 foot width utility easement over all publicly owned utility lines not located within public right-of-way. 9. This development shall dedicate the necessary ponding easements for Pond AP -4 and Pond AP -35. 10. This development shall also post the south side of the private drive as: "Fire- Lane - No Parking" and restrict parking along Beaver Dam Road at all times. /a/ 6 4 APC Minutes August 26, 1966 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. All trash must be kept in the individual garages until the day of pick up by one collector. 13. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the cul-de- sac island. 14. A financial guarantee for the landscaping ensuring proper installation and sizes shall not be released until one full year after completion. 15. That a homeowners association shall. be established in accord with City staff approval. 16. The reduction in density to the City will not be transferable to • other portions of the Planned Development. 17. A 50 foot buffer shall be maintained between the buildings and neighboring parcels. All voted in favor except Wilkins and Harrison who voted no. JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was the preliminary plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition by Good Value Homes, Inc. consisting of 12 townhouse units on approximately 4 acres located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 33, south of Cliff Road and east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application. Mr. John Petrim of Good Value Homes, Inc, was present to provide information in regard to the development of these three quad units in an area previously ,not developed by the original developer or Orrin Thompson. Ms. Debbie Tresidder of 4639 Penkwe Way was present and indicated that she had relied upon representations of Orrin Thompson as indicated in a drawing of RidgeCliffe Addition wherein the area proposed was designated as common area. Ms. Barbara Young was present and indicated her reliance upon the same representations and that the units provided a much different style as compared with the existing development. Voracek moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat, based upon the reliance of owners in the development upon representations of the previous developer, the adjacent owners and the City, that the area would be open area. All voted yea. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT MEETING At the suggestion of the chairperson, it was recommended that the September Joint Comprehensive Guide meeting be opened to developments to allow discussion of plans for various areas of the City not yet formalized. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion. All voted in favor. 7 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight PRELIMINARY PLAT/JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION G. Preliminary Plat for Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition --A public hearing was .held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on August 26, 1986, to consider a preliminary plat application submitted by Good Value Homes Inc. The Adivsory Planning Commission is recommending denial of the preliminary plat. There were a number of citizens present who stated that the marketing map used by.Orr'in Thompson Homes noted that there were no units proposed on the overall concept develop- ment plan and that this area was intended as open space. • For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report found on pages W4_4 through 130 . For additional information regarding the action that was taken by the. APC, refer to a copy of those minutes found on page(s),/3/ . 0.1 The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed subdivision. It is their recommendation that a cash dedication requirement be approved for the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat for Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition as presented. /23 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: Preliminary Plat (Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition) APPLICANT: Good Value Homes, Inc. LOCATION: Outlot B (Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Add.) EXISTING 20NING: NW; Sec 33R-3 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: 26 August 1986 DATE OF REPORT: 12 August 1986 REPORTED BY: Planning a Engineering S APPLICATION: An application has been submitted requesting preliminary plat approval for the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. This plat consists of 3 four-plex buildings on Outlot B of the Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition. That plat was submitted by Orrin Thompson Homes and approved in 1984. No construction has taken place on Outlot B, located south of Cliff Road and west of Ridge Cliff Drive. CODE COMPLIANCE: The total number of units in the 4th and 5th Additions will increase from 56 to 68 units. The gross area for Outlot B is 5.1 acres. Twelve additional units give the Outlot an overall density of 7.01 units/acre, well within the 6-12 range permitted in R-3 districts. The lots are 10' larger than the building itself with the remaining area being designated as an outlot-common space. The buildings are serviced by private drives and 2 additional parking spaces per unit are provided in front of the garages. COMMENTS: The main reason buildings were not placed here originally is due to the poor soil. The developer will have to correct the soils to ensure proper drainage and building suitability. These 1056 S.F. (main level) buildings will be architecturally the same as others in the area.. The exterior will have a brick base with aluminum siding. An association for this 12 unit plat will be combined with that of the 4th Addition for better continuity. The association will maintain the grounds, remove trash on a single scheduled basis and provide snow removal. A detailed landscape plan will be a requirement of the final plat submission. The applicant will be providing an underground sprinkling system and the proposed landscaping will be similar to other units in the area. The landscape policy will require a miminum of .one tree per dwelling unit. AA / JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADD APC - AUGUST 26, 1986 PAGE 2 GRADING/DRAINAGE: The applicant's grading plan appears feasible and in accordance with City Codes. The grading will not significantly impact any existing drainage patterns and should not be a problem. UTILITIES: Utilities of sufficient size, capacity and depth exist within Penkwe Way and Ridge Cliffe Drive to provide service to this proposed development. Staff recommends that this development extend existing services from Block 2 and Block 3 of the 4th Addition to Block 2 of the 5th Addition. Similarly, services from Block 1 of the 4th Addition could be extended to a portion of Block 1 of the 5th Addition, and services from Block 5 of the 4th Addition could be extended to service a portion of Block 3 in the 5,th Addition. This would leave only Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3 of the 5th Addition requiring an additional service to be cut into Ridge Cliffe Drive. As long as the entireassociationwill remain the same, staff does not see any problem in extending existing services for . this proposed development. STREETS: This development is bordered by Ridge Cliffe Drive on the southeast and Penkwe Way along its north, west and southwesterly boundaries. Both streets are City residential streets built to their ultimate design sections. RIGHT-OF-WAY/EASEMENTS: The Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition provided dedicating all necessary right-of-way and easements. Staff does not see any need for any additional easements for this development.. Outlot B of the Johnny Cake Ridge 4th Addition contains a drainage and utility easement over all of it. This drainage and utility easement will have to be either vacated oder the areas designated as the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition or completely vacated and replatted with the Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition. This vacation will have to occur prior to final plat approval. PERMITS: No permits are required because this development only proposes on extending services and not constructing any main lines. ASSESSMENTS': The assessment records indicate that the City has assessed all trunk area related assessments for this proposed development. /2.6 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADD APC - PAGE 3 CONDITIONS': 1. This development shall use existing services for sanitary sewer and water to the newly developed lots. The only new service that will be allowed will be to provide service to Lots 1 and 2 of Block 1, and Lots 3 and 4 of Block 3. 2. The. vacation of the necessary drainage and utility easements over Outlot B for the proposed Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of the 5th Addition shall occur prior to final plat approval. 3. All costs associated with completing this development shall be the sole responsibility of this development. 4. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 5. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted and the financial guarantee shall not be released until after 1 year from time of installation. 6. The plat shall be subject to the Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission review and dedication requiements. • 0 ii - 0 E ri PRELIMINARY PLAT OF JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE FIFTH ADDITION E/61N . MI 14 13 �I cs ^ - ,.:� ____ •NL Mi SITE DAT/ . �-- Ri: fA655 MEA 511 ¢ K DENSITY E11ST 0 I _ • / / EENSITY .h T I wn/om EFFEDIST E CENLTY RKREFfI pL1T. &Y.5 t 61 TC intim. PRJRSD Y M 314" •Item) i l/lL1`I �Il E.15T ZON" R-5 iµ 9e� - VJ _ AOI�U ZOiIG R-5 a° i ,ur-awr n,LE AL DESCRIPTION a ° I • / I', .i{lil:a UIRDf a ..eMNY bl£ ROX FawrN wortxxr �FS I' i i ' yy�� 1111 .— /'' OWNER DEVELOPER BENNE Nn vu• dl 7W.550 �\yf 1 . •°l ° // SURVEYOR •.;• I sA mr ST EUsrls n a° ST NUL5511A6 RONEI M5 -SMB '"Iii ::xi.c+l �MATIN)lt M" S EIN FEET 0 0 :`°`-•'•.. RA .... ".. IN .., 13. 1 a 11 A 23 JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ADDITIONS Development Plan (is' 2nd 31d 8 41h additions) P Y" W. AWN/ A4 7- d rI ADDITION�. Typleft LOT DrVILOPMENT Z.. .... SCALE: I' A 100' . q U, .... I .... ...... ... -0.2 . .... .. I PII,0n1 mu All IBM t. A. VilNbtN 1k WOCIMS, INC. -------------- A BAB LAND SURVEYORS 0 0 APC Minutes August 26, 1986 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. All trash must be kept in the individual garages until the day of pick up by one collector. 13. The developer shall be responsible for the maintenance of the cul-de- sac island. 14. A financial guarantee for the landscaping ensuring proper installation and sizes shall not be released until one full year after completion. 15. That a homeowners association slial.l be established in accord with City staff approval. 16. The reduction in density to the City will not be transferable to other portions of the Planned Development. 17. A 50 foot buffer shall be maintained between the buildings and neighboring parcels. All voted in favor except Wilkins and Harrison who voted no. JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE 5TH ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT The last public hearing convened by Chairperson McCrea was the preliminary plat of Johnny Cake Ridge 5th Addition by Good Value Homes„ Inc. consisting of 12 townhouse units on approximately 4 acres located in part of the northwest quarter of Section 33, south of Cliff Road and east of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. Dale Runkle introduced the application. Mr. John Petrim of Good Value Homes, Inc. was present to prov-ide information in regard to the development of these three quad units in an area previously not developed by the original developer or Orrin Thompson. . Ms. Debbie Tresidder of 4639 Penkwe Way was present and indicated that she had relied upon representations of Orrin Thompson as indicated in a drawing of RidgeCliffe Addition wherein the area proposed was designated as common area. Ms. Barbara Young was present and indicated her reliance upon the same representations and that the units provided a much different style as compared with the existing development. Voracek moved, Harrison seconded the motion to recommend denial of the preliminary plat, based upon the reliance of owners in the development upon representations of the previous developer, the adjacent owners and the. City, that the area would be open area. All voted yea. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE AMENDMENT MEETING At the suggestion of the chairperson, it was recommended that the September Joint Comprehensive Guide meeting be opened to developments to allow discussion of plans for various areas of the City not yet formalized. Harrison moved, Trygg seconded the motion. All votedin favor. /.5/ 7 •. O Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contracts 86-21 & 86-22, Receive Bids/Award Contracts for Lighting in Parking Lot --The City has completed the preparation of specifications and the advertisement for bids to supply fixtures and poles and install, par -king lot light fixtures at three community parks. Those parks are Trapp Farm Park, Goat Hill and Rahn. For a list of the bidders, refer to page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON awarding of Contract 86-21 • $2,0,696.50 and 2) awarding of light poles and fixtures in • THIS ITEM: 1) Approve or deny the to Judd Electric in the amount of of Contract 86-23 for installation the amount of $19,200. /3v AWARD CONTRACT 86-22 & 86-23 Specifications and plans were prepared and an advertisement for bids to supply (86-22) and install (86-23) parking lot light fixtures at three (3) Community parks. Bids were received as follows: 86-22: Supplying fixtures/poles 1. Judd Electric $20,646.50 2. Northland Electric $20,880.00 3. J. H. Larsen Electric $24,708.35 The total of $39,846.50 is approximately $4,800 less than Staff estimate of $44,600.00. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Award Contract 86-22 to Judd Electric for supplying poles and fixtures for parking lot lighting, in the amount of $20,646.50 and award Contract 86-23 for installing light poles and fixtures, to Midland Electric in the amount of $19,200.00. Note: Staff had the project bid in two contracts: one for supplying materials, the other for installation. It was determined that bid amounts would be less utilizing separate bids. The primary savings being the competitive pricing of the poles and fixtures by suppliers, and elimination of typical "mark-ups" of material by installers. KV/bls /33 86-23: Install fixtures and electrical work 1. Midland Electric $19,200.00 2. Corrigan Electric $22,972.00 3. Ridgedale Electric $26,600.00 4. Berg Electric $26,715.00 5. Hilite Construction $31,372.00 6. Muska Electric $53,797.00 The total of $39,846.50 is approximately $4,800 less than Staff estimate of $44,600.00. • ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED Award Contract 86-22 to Judd Electric for supplying poles and fixtures for parking lot lighting, in the amount of $20,646.50 and award Contract 86-23 for installing light poles and fixtures, to Midland Electric in the amount of $19,200.00. Note: Staff had the project bid in two contracts: one for supplying materials, the other for installation. It was determined that bid amounts would be less utilizing separate bids. The primary savings being the competitive pricing of the poles and fixtures by suppliers, and elimination of typical "mark-ups" of material by installers. KV/bls /33 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty A. Public Improvement Contracts (continued) Item 2. Contract 86-23, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) --Detailed plans and specifications have been completed for the installation of the extensive trunk storm sewer improvements in the vicinity of Holland Lake. These plans are being presented to the Council in consideration of authorizing the advertisement for bid opening to be held at 10:10 a.m. on Friday, October 17, 1986. The Consultant Engineer and Public Works Director will be available to review these plans in detail with the Council at the meeting on September 16. In order to insure that this trunk storm sewer system is available to handle next spring's runoff, it is necessary to initiate this construction.as quickly as possible. All easements required for this project are being acquired through negotiations -or initiation of condemnation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans and specifications for Contract 86-23 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, October 17, 1986. ® Item 3. Contract 86-240 Receive Bids/Award Contract (Towerview Road and Highview Avenue) --At 10:30 a.m. on Friday September 12, formal bids were received for the upgrading of Highview Avenue and Towerview Road to City specifications. Enclosed on page 5 is a tabu'lation of the bids received showing the relationship of the low bidder to the estimates contained in the feasibility report for each of these projects. All bids will be checked for accuracy in their extensions and additions and a formal recomendation will be made by the Director of Public Works at the September 19 Council meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for Contract 86-24 (Towerview Road and Highview Avenue) and award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder. /# • L] CONTRACTORS 1. Alexander Construction 2. McNamara Contracting 3. Bituminous Roadways Towerview 469 Highview 476 STREET $32,292.00 30,864.25 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ----------- Feasibility Rept. Est. Bid Amount % Under Eng. Est. 7747d % Under Feas. Rpt. Est. ROAD ,No. /3,5 Our File No. 49396 BID TIME: 10:30 A.M., C.D.S.T. BID DATE: Friday, Sept. 12, 1986 TOTAL BASE BID ALT $63,156.25 + $1,500.00 69,686.50 + 1,000.00 70,660.85 + 350.00 TOWERVIEW PROJ. 469 $32,000.00 42;580.00 32,292.00 —1.0% —24.2 HICIVIEW PROD. 476 $33,000.00 36,670.00 30,864.25 —6.5% —15.8% E Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One A. Public Improvement Contracts (continued) Item 4. Contract 86-25, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Burr Oaks Addition) --As explained urrder Item E of Consent, the developer's engineer had already prepared detailed plans and specifications which have since been modified to conform to the first phase development of the Burr Oak Addition. These plans have been reviewed by staff and are being presented to the Council for their review and approval in consideration of authorizing advertisements for a bid opening. The Public Works Director will be available to review.the plans with the Council at the September 16 meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve plans for Contract 86-25 (Burr Oak Addition) and authorize the advertisement for bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Friday, Octbber 17, 1986. l3� Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Two PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS B.' Private Improvement Contracts - Item 1. Project 85 -BB, Final Acceptance (R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition) --Project -85-BB provided for the installation of utilities to service the R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition at the intersection of Conserve Drive and Yankee Doodle Road. All construction has been completed, final inspection performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and a recommedation is being forwarded for final acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85 -BB (R.L. Johnson 2nd Addition) and accept for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Project 85 -RR, Final Acceptance (Rahn Ridge Addition), -- All construction has been completed providing 'for the installation of streets and utilities to service the Rahn Ridge Addition connecting Vienna Woods with the County Courthouse p facility. All construction has been completed, final inspection V performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and a redommendation is being forwarded for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance by the City. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Project 85 -RR (Rahn Ridge Addition) and accept improvements for perpetual City maintenance. 131 • 41 Agenda Information Memo, September 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page 'Thirty -Three COMPARABLE WORTH UPDATE C. Comparable Worth Update --The City has received the final results for the comparable worth point values for each position that is classified in the City of Eagan. The Personnel Committee met on Tuesday, September 9, 1986, and reviewed the point values as received and is recommending a final consideration and action by the City Council. A copy of this list is in each packet without page number. For additional information and a review of the comparable worth update regarding a review to date by the Personnel Committee, refer to pages�through�. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To adopt the list of point values for each position as classified in the City. The Personnel Committee is proceeding with their review of a pay equity program that will allow the City to adopt a comparable worth pay plan that satisfied the intent of comparable worth legislation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve comparable worth point values as established by Data study results and review and consideration by Committee. /3 or deny the the Control the Personnel MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR 6 CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: COMPARABLE WORTH UPDATE Earlier this summer, the Personnel Committee of the City Council met to inspect the preliminary position hierarchy point totals for all positions in the City of Eagan. These point totals were the result of the Control Data Business Advisors comparable worth study as commissioned by the MAMA group. It was the recommendation of Control Data that cities perform a final review of all Time Spent Profiles (TSP's) in order to make the study results as accurate as possible. As you recall, the TSP for each position lists the tasks performed in that position and the • percent of time spent on each task. No values are included. As the members of the Personnel Committee reviewed the preliminary results, they were concerned about and pointed out possible inconsistencies in Eagan's results. They then requested that all TSP's receive one more review in order to insure as much accuracy as possible. Therefore, all department heads received the TSP's for all positions within their departments. They and the supervisors in their departments were requested to thoroughly examine each TSP and revise if necessary. A review was also performed by Administrative Assistant Duffy. The TSP's were reviewed by considering only if the tasks listed and the percent of time spent on those tasks were correct. No task values were released so values were not considered. • '' Those TSP's which were revised were returned to Control Data for processing in late July. The City received the revised printouts and the revised position hierarchy in early September. The hierarchy was presented to the Personnel Committee for thier review at a meeting held Tuesday, September 9. After review and discussion, it was their recommendation that the position hierarchy be presented to the City Council at the regular September 16, 1986 meeting for consideration of approval of its release to all employees. Enclosed without a page number please find a copy of the point hierarchy. Action will be needed to approve or deny release of the hierarchy to employees. If the Council does approve the release, department meetings would be held Wednesday, September 17, and all employees would receive the information from thier department heads, hopefully at the same time. An all -employee meeting would then be scheduled approximately a week later in order to answer any questions the employees might have. The week's delay would allow any initial emotional reactions time to die down. Al/ Employees will have the right to appeal their positions' results, but only under certain circumstances. Employees cannot appeal just because they feel that the point total is not high enough. They can, however, appeal on the basis that either the tasks or the percents of time listed in their TSP's are incorrect. They must refer to specific tasks and percents and back up their position with facts. The next steps in the comparable worth process will be to develop salary ranges, a method for placing individual employees on the ranges, and a time schedule for implementation. The Personnel Committee will be studying these issues in great detail in future meetings. TLH/HND MR • ti40 . MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE CHANNEL 9 NEWS The City Administrator was taped on Wednesday, September 10 for a news item on Eagan's growth that will be aired on the 9':00 news tonight on Channel 9. Channel 9 news is typically an hour in length with world news from 9-9:30 and local news the last half hour. • DEER HUNTING REQUEST FOR KENNELLY PROPERTY Enclosed on pages LIw through /- are copies of a letter from Jon Yanta and a response from the Department of Natural Resources regarding deerhunting with firearms by Jon Yanta on the Kennelly property. It was the City Council's desire in early August to not allow any special firearm deerhun,ts unless the property is contiguous with land that is included in the DNR hunt and further than the hunt would be coordinated by that state agency. Since the Yanta correspondence and response by DNR, Mr. Yanta has told both DNR and the City that he has decided to bow and arrow hunt on the Kennelly property which gives him several weekends to shoot his deer limits. NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK The City Council has been invited to attend a special disaster demonstration on Saturday, September 27 at the Rainbow Food Store. Please refer to the attached letter found on page 11.. HUMANE SOCIETY Enclosed on pages and are two (2) letters from residents addressed to the Mayor and City Council regarding Minnesota Valley Humane Society. PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY FOR THE CITY'S ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Enclosed on page is a letter from Bruce Medvec informing the City that the Lea ue of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has agreed to delete from its exclusion endors.,ement for the "professional engineers". All NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES CONFERENCE The National League of Cities Conference will be held at San Antonio, Texas on November 29 - December 3. If any member of the City Council is interested in attending, please let this office know soon so arrangements can be made for hotel and airplane reservations. The City Administrator has more information on the conference if any Councilmember is interested. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Enclosed without page number is an informational packet that was prepared by staff and the Economic Development Commission for tax increment financing. This packet of information provides all the documentation and requirements that were 'set for by the Economic Development Commission and incorporates data that was discussed and learned at the seminar in June. It is recommended that City Council review the TIF packet and at a future meeting this item will be placed on the agenda for the final review and consideration. With the exception of housing, tax increment financing guidelines were tightened significantly with the new tax law. In order to provide tax increment financing the City must incorporate a m-inimum of a 100 acres as the development district. FIRE TRAINING FACILITY The City of Burnsville is considering the construction of a fire training facility within their community. Since a fire training facility could serve more than one community, the cities of Apple Valley, Eagan, Lakevill and Savage have been contacted to determine whether there is interest on the part of those cities. Acting Fire Chief Schindeldecker and the City Administrator attended the meeting and will be briefing the City Council more on the cost and purpose of the fire training facility in the near future. LETTER TO THE EDITOR REGARDING HUMANE SOCIETY Enclosed is a copy of information that was submitted to "Eagan City Officials" by Jenice Keisling of Burnsville. That informa- tion is enclosed on pages /56 through ►52 . AIRPORT NOISE An article entitled "Keeping the Peace" was sent to all cities from Noise. The article is brief and informative and happens to pertain to Northwest Orients ambition to comply with the Stage 3 requirements by adding additional 57s to their fleet of aircraft. A copy is enclosed on page . Also enclosed on page IJK is a letter from Jeff Hamiel in response to the joint resolution submitted by the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights. This response is positive and encouraging. /�v . .. RECREATION DEPARTMENT INTERN The Director of Parks and Recreation was contacted by the University of Minnesota and asked if the City would consider a 3 month internship on a part-time basis to satisfy some classroom objectives. An intern, Julie Lencowski, will start a nonpaid internship on September 15. She will assist where she can, but generally looking over everyone's shoulder, trying to learn more about recreation and how the City functions. 'OU RESPONSE FROM NEIGHBORS IN THE AREA OF'IJ=NDRE Al Enclosed on page is a thank you to the Mayor and City Council. HRA STATUS REPORT ® Enclosed on pages /&"/0 is the most recent status report as submitted by the HRA. /s/ Thomas Hedges City Administrator' /�3 July 28, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: I am writing in regards to Joe Kennelly's land that is adjacent to the Minnesota State Park,.north of the Burlington Northern railroad tracks in Eagan. Recently, I spoke with John Parker of the Department of Natural Resources about the two -weekend slug hunt in the Minnesota State Park. In our conversation, John and I discussed the advantages of the Eagan City Council in creating a waiver that adheres to allowing our party to participate in the hunt on Joe Kennelly's land. Our party, which consists of my -two brothers and me, have hunted (bow, shotgun) for the past ten years on the land and feel that through our responsible past reputation that we should be con- sidered as a ,serious participant in this hunt. Mr. Parker noted that all deer taken from Kennelly's land would be added to the count of the deer harvested on the two -weekend hunt. In many ways this proposal will be beneficial to the City of Eagan, in particular, it will save costly efforts of sharp shooters that may be needed if the harvest is not productive. ®' Joe Kennelly and I would like to be present during the next city meeting! Please give me a call and update me on when the proceed- ings will take place. Thank you. Sincerely, 96m �.1NL11 Jon Yanta 2116 Emerald Lane Eagan, MN 55122 924-4616 (W) 454-1356 (H) jsa659 A I��I�S�TATE OF DEPARTMENT PHONENO.445-9393 Area Wildlife Manager 223 Holmes Street Shakopee, PIN 55379 Tom Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Know Road Eagan, NN 55122 OF NATURAL RESOURCES 9/5/86 FILE Subject: Firearms Deer Hunting by John Yanta party on Kennealy Property As you know we have both been discussing this issue with Lir. Yanta for the past month. I have investigated the possiblility of including Mr. Kennealy's property in the controlled hunt zone. This would not work out for several reasons. Hunting could only be done during the special season; this would preclude bow hunting by Lir.. Yanta. Hunting could only be done by hunters selected in the special hunt lottery; this might preclude Mr. Yanta from hunting. The end result could be that we included the land in the special hunt but actually reduced the amount of hunting and deer removal. I recommend that the Cit issue three permits for the property (I've been told that it is 60 acres. This would be about 1 hunter per 20 acres or approximately our special hunt density. .The city -should require the hunters to attend the special hunt orientation and to obey all regulations of the special hunt. Since the hunt is being held during the "bucks only" season, the hunters would be allowed to take only bucks. Mr. Yanta understands this. Mr. Yanta's party would be allowed to deer hunt with bow and arrow for the entire remainder of the season, city ordinances permitting. I hope you can permit this arrangement. we need to get as much hunting pressure in this area as possible to -avoid the possibility of sharpshooting. ® Hunters in this area will increase the effectiveness of the special hunt on state land by keeping the deer moving and by reducing the amount of "refuge". Let me know if I can help by letter or phone; I cannot justify appearing before the City Council for this number of hunters. Thanks for your help. a Wildlife Manager I¢5 AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER E0 J September 2, 1986 Honorable Bea Blomquist,- Mayor City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mrs. Blomquist and City Council Members: DIVINE REDEEMER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 724 Nineteenth Avenue North South St. Paul, Minnesota 55075 (612)450-4500 I would like to take this opportunity to invite you to attend a special disaster demonstration involving your Police and Fire departments, along with our para- medics, in celebrating National Emergency Medical Services Week. Come and see your first responders at work! • Place: Rainbow Foods, Eagan When: Saturday, September 27, 1986 Time: 12 noon to 3 p.m. Since y, O Drew Haynes Administrator jl An American Healthcare Management Hospital s'J;a^.ER 86' Dear Sir; I :rant you to know that as a tax -payer and concerned citizen of this County I think it is inexcusable that we do not have an animal shelter! The Minnesota. Valley Humane Societe of Dakota County (,,iViS) has been strur�.�lin- for years to build a shelter and hundreds of people like .myself support their efforts. iihy haven't you noticed?.? ® This "all when the MV?dS approaches you for support I hope you will also recognize the -rea.t need we have in this County and Help us build the shelter re neer'. • Thankyou. Respectfully, �jLw wa�u� Grp IV/ SUMMER 86' Dear Sir; I want you to know that as a tax -payer and concerned citizen of this County I think it is inexcusable that we do not have an animal shelter! The Minnesota Valley Humane Society of Dakota County (WHS) has been struggling for years to build a shelter and hundreds of people like myself support their efforts. Why -haven't you noticed.?? This Fall when the MVHS approaches you for support I hope you will also recognize the great need we have in this County and help us build the shelter we need. Thankyou. Res ct"_1 , �J� J X4' , p yr -,an % NN A G Cr tl•.t � ' O First Insurance ,,I) Twin Cities First Insurance Twin Cities 8000 West 78th Street Suite 400 Edina, Minnesota 55435 612 8234600 September 9, 1986 Mr. Gene Vanoverbeke Finance Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 • RE: Staff Engineer's Professional Liability Dear Gene: I am pleased to inform you that the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has agreed to delete from its exclusion endorsement "professional engineers". The new endorsement will continue to exclude attorney's, doctors, nurses, and architects. This is significant in that the Comprehensive General Liability policy will now include coverage for your staff professional engineer. With this in mind, the entire subject of design errors and omissions, gray areas of coverage and the general reluctance of the City to allow your professional engineers to sign off on plans and blueprints should now be resolved. • I wish to remind the City that your professional engineering staff is protected to the amount of only $600,000. This limit is identical to the Minnesota Statute and to the policy the City of Eagan purchased on July 1, 1986. If you should have any further comments or questions, please feel free to call on me at any time. _ Per re ards uce A. Medvec Senior Account Executive BAM:las cc: Mr. Tom Colbert Professional Engineer �i/ Cl O j.., September 4, 1986 To The Editor: It really brightened my morning to read the article about Harrieth Champine and her animal welfare work (Variety 8/18). The world needs more people like her. Then I got further into the paper and read'the article criticizing the Eagan pound (Community, 8/Z8). and my bright mood was replaced by frustration and disappointment. The article about Mrs. Champine praises her for all the good she's done for the Humane Society and animals of Hennepin County, which I agree with. But the animals of Eagan (Dakota County) also need help, more, in fact, because Dakota County is the only.County in the seven -county metro area without an animal shelter! The article about the Eagan pound states that the city is 'searching' for a new location for stray animals, but the Minnesota Valley Humane Society of Dakota County has been unsuccessful in its requests for support for a County shelter. Where, then, could the city of Eagan be conducting this search? What do the people on Blue Jay Way propose be done with all the stray animals in our area? Stray animals which are, by the way, results of uninformed or irresponsible people! Eagan (pop 35,311) and Dakota County are growing very fast, and out of this Targe population, depressingly few (less than 200) are supporters of the Humane Society. Our neighboring counties are tired of taking care of our • animals problems; someday a shelter will have to be built. I can't believe the residents of Dakota County are that uncaring. Can't we pool together now and support a Humane Society shelter for Dakota County? Jenice Keisling Burnsville /�61 %javOMMUM LY Dakota/ Scott zone pages inside dog days, evoke howls to close Eagan pound By Rob Hotakalee Staff Writer N Folks who moved `%"innesota's lastest, growing city In search of the quiet suburban life style now say they're suffering physical and emo- tional distress as the dog days of summer surrender to fall. They're blaming It on the dogs Legend hat'It that dogs are prone to spells of madness and that people tend to become listless as they cope with hol, sticky weather. Ancient Greeks, Romans and Egyptians blamed the steamy weather on Siri- us, the dog star that rises with the sun in late summer. Modern-day Eaganites blame their misery on the howls, barks and whines coming from a kennel tucked between the condominiums and apartments that serve as a statement of the city's progress. They want the city's animal pound closed — now. Seventy-one people on Blue Jay Way have petitioned the cltg to revoke a kennel license granted to Bill and Kim Abel, who have operated the city's animal pound at their "farm" on 3506 S. Lexington Av. since 1078. and to turn up the volume on her television set. "It's especially bad for myself and the ladyupstalrs," she said. "They're right out our patio." Wittles and her neighbors claim the Abels are violating a city ordinance and that the dogs are disturbing the peace by "barking, howling, whining and making other loud noises at all hours of the day and night." A public hearing before the Eagan City Council to consider revoking the kennel license Is set for Oct. 21, said Tom Hedges, Eagan city administra- tor. Meanwhile, he said; the city Is escalating Its search for a new loca- tion for stray animals picked up In .the.city limits.. "We'll get shut down — that's for sure," said Bill Abel. "I kind of re- sent it, but that's progress. What are you going to do about It?" The pound and kennel, known as Silver Emblem Kennels, can hold 19 animals and has been used to house dogs, cats, rabbits, goats and other animals. The Abels are paid $3.50 per day for each animal taken to the pound by city officers. The city's progress already has chased away the deer, raccoons and "They bark all night. Usually one':. pheasants that played on the Abels', starts, then they all gang In," said lIV"crp tract. only,eight years ago. Flora W Ittles, who moved. intp: here And since motkg to the agricultural - condominium at 3575 Blue Jay Way' vly toned land In 1978, the Abets have five months ago. watched the awby swamp being overtaken by thi- C01101hlaiulp Her response to the noisy dogs is to dwellers. keep her doors end windows shYS "That used to be out In the O n - docks three or four years ago," said Eagan Police Chief Jay Berthe. "Our country setting is leaving us quick. out here.... These are the first com- plaints we've had. This Is a whole new experience for us." But such Issues are to be expected for a city that continues to outpace all others in Minnesota in population growth. Planners estimated the city's popula- tion at 35,311 as of April 1, up by 14,611 since 1980, said Pat O'Connell, planning assistant with the Metropol- itan Council. The agency analyzes population data for the seven -county metropolitan region. Among all Minnesota cities with pop- ulations of at least 10,000, Eagan and Eden Prairie rated as the fastest growing, based on 1984 figures, ac- cording to a spokeswoman for the state demographer's office. Responding to growing citizen com- plaints, police warned the Abels to quiet their dogs or face a possible citation. Berthe said the police de- partment will not make an arrest, but that a woman has threatened to make a citizen's arrest if the dogs continue to disturb peace in the neighborhood. —r Thursday August 28/1986 Staff Photo by Art Hager Flora Witlles stood outside her condominium and looked toward the The Abels said theyhave offered to. Eagan animal pound. "They bark all night," she said. move . th_e kennel for $50,00O..City officials said they have; talkg9,to-.:That',y:an:{{vgnue for working some - local veterinarians in Eagan. to see, : �Ihin� out ll�Ye," said Berthe, whether they will take to 1h,4'al'ray,.,'<'c,,," animals. In the 'meantime, any ,�bkes about ¢ going tq. the'dogs won't draw "A couple of them are Interested. Iy laughs. "When people call us, we take every thing seriously," said Berthe. "It', one of those things that are bugging some people. We're not laughing about it, that's for sure." A ' Pr r. ,.. _�-++r.•�r�JR"`t� 1 - '^�j'y �r'i.-i�Jr [> �_ r�t �-��• "�B 'Sr..+�. _.- �`� �-+�•Tfl"s �p a �'fr � �ez-i lti.�r 'r. >`.. . KEEPING THE PEACE t was in 1960 that Northwest Orient entered the jet age by purchasing a number of McDon- nell Douglas DC -8C aircraft. Just prior to introducing the new high-speed plane, the airline em- barked on a program of extensive re- search and experimentation to de- termine the best method of operation for the DC -8C. Based on the researchers' findings, Northwest Orient developed and instituted the aviation industry's first noise abate- ment procedures for high-speed commercial aircraft. The researchers found that adher- ence to certain procedures would yield both quieter and more fuel effi- cient flights, reducing the intensity of noise that people on the ground heard as well as the duration of the noisier periods. The procedures in- cluded a slightly steeper climb just after takeoff, so that most of the audi- ble decibels were concentrated over the airport itself; flaps retracted at 1,Ooo feet of altitude, to decrease the drag and reduce the engine thrust necessary to launch the plane; usage of reduced power until the plane reached 3.000 feet; and the usage of climb power only after the plane was far above or array from congested residential areas. These same steps arc reversed to reduce noise upon landing- The methods have been, of course, refined over time, along By 1990, 60 percent of Nortburst Orient's capacity will be carried on Stage li'i aircraft such as 757s, among the quietest planes in the soy with technological developments. Soon after Northwest Orient im- plemented the noise abatement pro- gram, other airlines followed suit, and Northwest Orient has twice been recognized by the National Or- ganization to Insure a Sound Con- trolled Environment (N.O.I.S.E.) and has received other awards for its work toward noise abatement pro- grams. Studies at communities close to airports throughout the United States name the airline as the one whose pilots most consistently ad- here to these procedures, stressed in Northwest Orient pilot training. Late in the 1960s, jet engine modi- fications commonly termed "hush kits" became available. Although they were expensive to install— S250,000 per plane—Northwest Orient added them to its early model 727s and 747s, known as Stage I planes, the aircraft that generate the highest decibel levels. The airline spent S10 million to refit the Stage I aircraft in its fleet. The quietest, newest aircraft fall into the category of Stage III. North- west Orient has always bought the most technologically advanced air- planes available and sold off its older models while they still have residual value. The oldest plane in the North- west fleet is a 727, and the airline has in its fleet one of the largest percent- ages of Stage 111 aircraft in the nation. (It also has one of the largest per- centages of wide-body aircraft in its fleet, meaning that the airline can carry more passengers per flight, re- ducing the number of flights it must schedule and, therefore, the amount of noise it generates. ) Today, Northwest Orient has out- - standing orders for 33 more Stage Ill aircraft. By 1990, 60 percent of the airline's capacity will be carried on aircraft of this kind, the quietest com- mercial planes available. Fleet mod- ernization is the single most effective measure an airline can take to con. trol noise levels over the communi- ties it serves, and it is a step to which Northwest Orient is most committed. The airline has done and will con. tinue to do all it can to control the noise it generates over the communi- ties it serves. This is only one of the reasons why many communities near the airports Northwest Orient serves consider it a "good neighbor." The 16,500 people who work for Northwest Orient all live and work in communities served by the carrier. And the many passengers who have flown on Northwest Orient since its beginnings in 1926 are members of communities around the world. The Northwest Orient commitment to those communities is to continue to employ the best technology, experi- ence, and training. /53 a pftt • T �C� mwobpobs 0 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. O. BOX 11700 TWIN CITY AIRPORT MINNESOTA 55111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (812) 728.1892 September 8, 1986 The Honorable Bea Blomquist Mayor City of Eagan Eagan, MN 55123 Dear Mayor Blomquist: The Metropolitan Airports Commission is in receipt of your Joint Resolution 86-62 from the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights. As you know, the MAC has been conducting an aircraft departure survey in your coamunity for the last two months. The results of that survey clearly indicate that a tightening up of procedures is in order. In addition, the staff of the MPC is looking at ways to improve the use of the Corridor and guarantee stricter compliance with procedure. Your community has been very responsible in its planning efforts by carefully developing the Corridor and it is our responsibility to continue to work toward optimum use of the Corridor as originally intended. I appreciate your forwarding this resolution and I assure you that it will be given the Commission's prompt attention. Si ce e y, Jeffrey W. Hamiel Executive Director JWH:gm cc: Robert G. Lockwood Mayor, Mendota Heights Ifv OFFICE LOCATION -6040 281h AVE. SO. -WEST TERMINAL AREA -MINNEAPOLIS -SAINT PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT September 3,1986 TO: Mayor Bloomquist and Council Members cc: Tom Colbert Tom Hedges Jay Berthe • The 45 households and myself would like to send our sincere thanks for your immediate attention to our stop sign issue. It is comforting to know that the city does care. Sincerely, aanne O'Keefe 155 DAKOTA COUNTY pwNneehl H A Serving People and Communities M E M O R A N D U M DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 SEF`5 YV•-•. TO:. HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred Joy, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department FROM: Mark Ulfers, Executive Director 1l A� SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMU�VELOPMENT DATE:, September 4, 1986 Enclosed are the August Status Reports for all the Assisted Housing Programs in Dakota County and the Community Development Programs administered by the Dakota County HRA. If you would like additional information on any of the programs, please feel free to call me. Enclosure "AN' vnllnl nDDnDTI1K11TV CIIDInVCD'• Brief description of assisted housing programs: 1. Section 8 Existing: Eligible low and moderate income households pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for uti- lities) for rent in market rate rental units. The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) pays the rest. The rental units must pass federal inspection standards and the rent plus an allowance for utilities paid by the renter, must not exceed established Fair Market Rent limits. 2. Moderate Rehab: The Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation program offers owners of rental property assistance for making building repairs which will bring their properties into compliance with Housing Quality Standards. The owner, in turn, agrees to rent to households eligible for Section 8 Rent Assistance. The rental of these units is coordinated through the Dakota County HRA and the rent payments for the tenants is the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available. 3. Section 8 New Construction: The developers of these units receive a subsidy Tor construction of these units. The owners in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low 'and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. These rental deve- lopments are owned by private developers. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no longer available except for Section 202 projects for senior citizens. 4. Low Rent Housing: The Dakota County HRA (or South St. Paul HRA) owns and manages the housing units offered through the Low Rent Housing Program. These housing units are rented to eligible low and moderate income house- holds who pay 30% of their monthly adjusted gross income (less an established allowance for utilities) for rent. 5. 235 Home Ownership: This program offered assistance to eligible low and moderate households for purchasing a home. The program is no longer available. 6. 236 Rental: The developers of these units receive a subsidy for construc- tion of these units. The owners, in turn, are required to rent these units to eligible low and moderate income households. The rental payments for tenants are the same as Section 8 Existing. Besides the existing units in place, this program is no lon,ger available. ASSISTED HOUSING REPORT - AUGUST, 1986 *South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 and Low Rent Housing Program. I I SECTION 8 1 MODERATE I SECTION 8 NEW I LOW RENT 1235 HOME 1 236 RENTAL I CURRENT I I EXISTING I REHAB I CONSTRUCTION I HOUSING I FAMIL I FAMILY I TOTALS GRANDI COMMUNITIES -------------- I ELD I ---- FAMILY ------ TOTAL] -- I ELD ----- FAMILY --- TOTALI ELD FAMILY TOTALI ELD FAMILY TOTALI TOTAL I TOTAL I ELD FAMILY TOTALI APPLE VALLEY 1 11 42 53 1 0 0 ----I----- 0 1 0 - -----I 56 56 1 ---------------- 0 43 I - 43 1 ----- - 0 I ------------ 1 0 I ------------------ 1 11 141 I 152 1 -------------I BURNSVILLE --I------------------- ----------1-=--------- 1 54 101 155 1 0 0 I---------- 0 1 0 87 I 87 10 ---------------I 56 -------I 56 1 0 --------1---------------- 180 I 54 424 I 478 I --- - EAGAN ----- 1 30 I--------I---------1-----------I----------I---- 159 189 1 0 --- 0 --1----------I------------I-------I 0 1 0 33 33 1 0 17 17 1 0 - ----- 1 144 I ----------------I 1 30 353 383 1 FARMINGTON --- -- 1 20 I -- 51 ------ 71 1 I 0 ------- 0 0 1 -I----------------I 75 0 75 1 0 2 2 1 --I 4 --- -------- 1 0 I-- -- 1 95 ---- 57 I 152 1 HASTINGS ------------I-------------I-----------I------------I=--------- 1 54 146 200 1 4 14 18 1 109 0 109 1 ------- 0 --- 10 --- I ---- 10 1 ----- 0 I -------- I 1 0 1 --------------- 167 170 I 337 1 INVER GROVE HEIGHTS ---------- 1 26 I---------I-------=------I----------I----------------I---- 182 208 1 0 0 0 1 0 40 40 1 0 6 --I---------I 6 1 31 ------------ I-- 1 202 1 -------- 26 - 461 ----- I 487 1 LAKEVILLE 1 13 43 56 1 0' 0 0 1 24 0 24 1 0 11 11 1 ---I-----------I------------------I 2 1 0 1 37 56 93 1 ----- ---- LILYDALE I -- 1 0 I 0 --- I---=--------- 0 1 0 0 I --------I 0 1 0 0 ------------ 0 1 0 6 I --------- 0 1 0 I ------------I 1 0 1 ----------------- 0 0 I 0 1 �p MENDOTA ---- - ------- 1 2 -I--------I 1 I-----=-I-----------I-------- 3 1 0 ------- 0 .0 1 I`----- 0 0 ---1---------1-------I-------1--------------I 01 0 0 I ---- 0 1 --- 0 I ----------- I 1 0 1 ---- ------ 2 1 - I 3 1 MENDOTA HEIGHTS 1 0 8 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 12 12 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 13 13 1 ---=-----_-I-` ROSEMOUNT ------ 1 10 I 30 -I----------1----------I--------------I- 40 1 0 0 0 1 39 28 67 1 0 30 30 1 --------I--------- 2 --I 1 0 1 ------- 49 ---- 90 ----- I 139 1 ------- - SOUTH ST. PAUL + - 1 32, ------ 135 I 167 1 ----------1--- 0 0 0 1 0 -------I 44 ----------------- 44 1 300 0 I ----- 300 1 2 I -------I 1 0 1 ------ 332 -- 181 - 513 1 ------- -I SUNFISH LAKE ---I-------------I------- --------- 1 0 1 I 1 1 0 0 --------- 0 1 0 0 ----1-------------- 0 1 0 0 I - 0 1 ------ - 0 I ------- --I 1 0 1 --------- 0 ------- 1 I 1 1 ------ WEST ST. PAUL 1 182 I---- 154 336 1 0 ---I-------------I--------------- 6 6 1 0 0 0 1 80 7 I------I---- 87 1 0 --I-----------------I 1 0 1 262 167 429 1 I -- OTHER - 1 1 I------- 6 1 71 I 0 ------------I----------1------------ -----I---- 0 0 1 0 --- -----I-- 0 01 ---------I-------I-- 0 0 0 1 I `--------- 0 - ---I--- 1 0 1 I ---------I ----------I 0 -- ------- 6 ------- 01 I TOTALS --------- I 1 435 I I I --- 1051 ------ I 1486 1 I I I 4 ------- 21 I 25 1 I I I ---- 247 300 ------- I 547 1 I I I 380 ---------- 182 I 562 1 I I I -------- 41 I I I I I 1 526 1 I I ----------- 1066 ----------------- 2121 I 3187 1 I I I *South St. Paul administers separate Section 8 and Low Rent Housing Program. Brief description of Community Development Programs: Weatherization: Through a joint effort of the Dakota County HRA and Economic Assistance, low-income homeowners and rental units occupied by low- income tenants are being weatherized to reduce the consumption of precious fuels, promote energy conservation, and reduce the burden of high heating costs on low-income county residents who can least afford rapidly rising utility bills. 2. MHFA Home Improvement Loans: The Dakota County HRA administers this State program as a Title I lender. Loans are made to eligible homeowners (adjusted gross income less than $24,000 annually) for code compliance items and certain general improvements. An interest rate of 3% to 11.5% is charged depending on the applicant's income. 3. MHFA Home Rehab Loan: These loans are made to eligible low-income homeowners adjusted gross income under,$7,000 annually) for rehabilitation items that directly affect the health, safety, energy conservation and accessibility of the home. These are deferred loans and are available to households with adjusted gross- incomes under $7,000 annually. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 4. MHFA Home Energy Loan: These loans are made to eligible homeowners for energy items. The interest rate is 8% for homeowners with adjusted gross incomes of less than $24,000 annually and an interest rate 9% for those with adjusted gross incomes of more than $24,000 annually. This program is admi- nistered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. Rental Rehab: Rental Rehabilitation loans are available to owners of rental units. There are no income or asset limitations. The loan amount cannot exceed $15,000 per one dwelling unit and for structures with more than one unit the loan limit is $7,500 per unit with a maximum of $37,500. The interest rate on the loan is 11%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 6. CDBG Rehab Loan: Various housing rehabilitation programs have been done using Community Development Block Grant funds. They have assisted low and moderate income homeowners in making repairs to their homes with low interest loans and grants (grants are no longer available). This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 7. MHFA Solar Bank: Deferred loans are given to eligible low and moderate income homeowners for energy, items. The eligible homeowners are referred from Northern States Power Company. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA. 8. 312 Loans: These loans are given to eligible owners of residential struc- tures at an interest rate of 3%. The loan funds must be used to bring the property into compliance with local codes, rehabilitation standards and some types of general improvements. Commercial and mixed use (commercial and residential) properties may apply for loans with an interest rate of 9%. This program is administered by the Community Development staff of the Dakota County HRA in HUD approved target areas. � ', (^ ).- Z't�' �_� n��'�41i'��`•N�'.�..��.° :.� �"•_ M_ t,ye4�Y"?_r •n�j�� f_'D"*'fi.5". p ' �..- .. REPORT MAY 1976-MGUST 1986 DAKOTA COI1(f1' HRA COMMRNTY DEVELOPMENT HEATHERIZATION NHEA HOME IMPROV LOAN MHFA HOME REHAB LOAN MHFA HOME ENERGY LOAN RENTAL REHAB LOAN COBS REHAB LOAN COBS REHAB LOAN - MH, MHFA SOLAR BANK LOAN 312 LOANS COMMUNITIES ELD FPM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL ELD LG SM. TOTAL ELD LG SM TOTAL L.FAM S.FAM COMM ELD TOTAL APPLE VALLEY 1 1 74 1 75 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 5 1 6 B 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 B I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 BURNSVILLE 17 1 137 1 154 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 B 1 4 1 5 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 B I 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 4 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 6 1 0 I B I 0 CANNON FALLS 2 1 2 1 4 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 B 1 B 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 I 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 CASTLE ROCK 0 1 4 1 4 B 1 0 I I I I B I 1 I l 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 B I 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 EAGAR 5 1 56 1 61 0 1 1 1 5 1 6 3 I 1 1 2 1 6 1 1 1 1 6 1 B 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 1 I 1 1 2 1 I__ 4 01 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 01 0 0 1 ----- 1 ----- 0 1 0 1 0 1 I_____ 0 ---- FARMINGTON —I—I— 24 1 118 1 142 —1--I--I— B 1 2 1 7 1 9 --1—I-1___ 2 1 1 1 4 1 7 ___1 ---- 2 1 1 1 1 ---- 1--- 13 1 15 ---- I—_1 0 1 0 1 ---- I__. 0 1 0 ____ I___ I 7 1 1 1 --- 4 1 12 ___1____1__1_____ 0 1 0 1 0 1 _____1____1__1___ 0 _____ ----- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 _____; I—__I C 1 ---- ;_—I 2 1 ----- 1 I --- I____ 1 HASTINGS 48 1 134 1 182 5 1 6 1 26 1 37 21 1 4 1 II 1 36 1 1 2 1 4 1 7 4 1 1 1 5 1 10 13 1 7 1 18 1 38 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 4 1 4 1 1 3 1 C 1 2 1 4 HAMPTON 5 1 11 1 16 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 3 1 0 1 1 1 4 0 1 B I 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 B I 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 ____I__1—_p____ 0 I 0 I 0 ____I_____ 0 I 2 1 I_____ 0 1 I_____ 0 _____1____1____1_.__1._ 2 1 2: 0 1 2 1 ^ `. INVER GROVE _I___I— 23 1 110 1 133 _I__1___I___ 3 1 4 1 10 1 17 __I___I___I_____ 4 1 2 1 15 1 21 ____I___I____1____ 0 1 0 1 7 1 7 ___1____ 0 1 I_____ 0 1 I_____ 0 1 0 ____1___1___1__ 1 1 4 1 B 1 13 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 LAKEVILLE 16 1 90 1 106 0 1 B I 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 5 6 1 ___I___I___1___ B 1 4 1 4 0 1 __1____1____1_____ 0 1 ----- 0 1 0 ----- _____I ____; 4 1 0 1 _____ 1_____I ___I—_ 2 1 ____;_ 6 ____I___;____ 0 1 _—I___1___I____- 0 1 1____ 0 1 _____; 0 ----- 0 1 1____1____;___- 0 1 0 1 2 _____ 0 1 I_____1___; 0 I O I 0 1 ____1_____ C LILYDALE 0 1 0 1 0 — I 0 1 — I 0 1 — I B I — B —I—I-1— 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 I 0 MENDOTA 21 21 4 21 01 01 2 21 01 01 2 01 01 01 I____ 0 01 01 BI 0 11 01 ____1_____1__1____ BI 1 01 ___; 01 ___I____;___-_ 61 0 ----- CI 1 ----- CI 1 ----- 01 1----- 2 ____;----- C: II 1 ----- CI ; 11 ----- ;____. 2 ____— MENDOTA HEIGHTS —;—I— IB 1 It 1 21 _—_1___1___1-- B I 1 1 3 1 4 --I—I—I—_ 3 1 0 1 2 1 5 ___1 ----- 1 1 I ----- 0 1 5 1 6 __I__-1____1—_ 1 1 0 I 0 1 1 ___ 2 1 1 1 ____;___1—__I___ I I 4 0 1 ____ 1____;____ 0 1 0 I I_____ 0 _ 2 1 --- ;___ 0 1 I_____;_____ 2 1 0 ----- 2 1 ;_____; C I ----- C 1 ;_____;_____ 2 1 0 MIESVILLE I I 1 1 2 0 1 B I 0 I 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 B I 0 1 I 0 1 I--- 0 --I 0 1 —I__1—_1---- --- 0 1 0 I 0 0 1 0 1 __— 1 ----- I 0 1 ----- I--- B 0 1 __1_I—_1----- 0 1 B I B _____;____I____ 0 1 0 1 0 1 1____ B ____I_____ 0 1 2 1 1_____ 0 I I_____;____ 0 I 2 ____ NORTHFIELD —I-1— 5 1 It I 16 _—I--I—_I— 0 1 0 1 3 1 3 —_I-1 0 1 0 1 --- I--- 0 1 0 ---- 1 ---- 0 I ---- B I 1 I 1 0 I B I 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 0 0 1 I__I 0 1 0 1 1----- 0 _____ 0 1 1_____I____;____ 2 1 0 1 0 ___ 0 1 1 ---- 0 1 ;----- C 1 1 0. 1 ----- ;...__ C RAVENNA 01 01 B --- 1—I 01 BI --- ;— 01 0 — I 01 — I BI — I 01 — 0 --1_-1 01 --- 01 1--- II 1 —I__;_1__ 21 01 BI B --- ---- ; 01 BI ___I --- 1 --- I--- 01 --- I_— 0 --- 01 ___I____ ---- BI 1____I__ BI 0 ___;___1_____ 21 21 CI I_____ 0 ----- 01 ;---- CI ;----- 01 ;_____; CI 2 RANDDLPH 2 1 9 1 11 —I—I—I-- B I 1 I I I 2 —1—I—I—_ 0 I 0 I B 1 B _—I___1_-1___ 0 1 1 1 11 2 _—_1—_I_I__ 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 I 0 1 B 1 0 1 C 0 1 0 1 2 I C 0 I 0 I 0 1 0 1 2 ROSEMOINT 9 1 66 1 77 B I 1 1 7 1 B 6 1 0 1 0 1 6 0 I 0 1 19 1 19 0 1 ;—_I__1__ 6 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 ---I ----- 3 1 4 0 1 ___I___1____;____ 0 1 0 1 0 _____I____p____ 0 1 0 1 0 1 I—_ C ----- 0 I ;----- 11 ;----- 0 1 I_____ 2 1 I___ 1 SOUTH ST. PAUL 03 1 207 1 296 B I 0 1 B 1 0 B I B I 0 1 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 0 --- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 I 2 ----- 0 1 ;----- 0 1 I_____ 0 1 1____ 0 ----- 0 1 I ----- 2 I ;_____; 0 I 0 1 ___ SUNFISH LAKE —I—;— 0 1 0 1 B —_1___I__I_—_ 0 1 0 I B I 0 __I_I—__1___ B I 0 1 2: 0 ____I____1_____;___ 0 1 0 1 0 I 0 ___1____I____;_____ 0 1 6 1 0 1 ----- 0 _____I____;___ 0 1 0 1 _____I___1___I__ p__ 0 1 0 0 1 ___1___1___1__._ ---- 0 1 ----- 0 1 0 ----- 2 1 1____I 0 1 ----- 0 1 I----- 2 _____I_____ C 1 C 1 1_____I_____ 2 1 2 1 1_____ 0 __-- VERMILLION —I-1— 1 1 3 1 4 —_1__1___1___ 0 1 0 1 0 1 B __I B I -1___I____ 0 1 0 1 0 ____1_____1_____1___ 0 1 0 1 B 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 _____I----- I----- 8 1 I___ 0 0 1 ____ I ---- 0 1 ;---- 2 1 I____ 9 _____1____I 0 1 0 1 0 1 ____;____ 0 _____I 2 1 _____ 0 I' I_____;_____;_____ 2 1 0 1 0 HEST ST.PAD. —I-- --- 53 1 81 1 134 ___I__I___I--- 20 I 6 1 32 1 58 _-1_I—_1____ 14 1 6 1 15 1 35 _—I_—;.__1__._ 5 1 0 1 1 1 6 ____1___I___p__ 19 1 0 1 13 1 32 56 I 15 1 I I 54 1 I 125 0 1 I 0 1 I 0 1 I 0 0 1 I 0 1 I 2 1 I 2 1 1 I 9 1 I 0 1 I 0 1 I :0 i0T11L5 I 1 I 307 11129 11036 I I I I 31 I I I I 23 1101 I I I I I RSB I I 61 I I I I 16 I I I I SB 1 135 I I IBI I I 6 1 I 1 71 I I 86 I 24 I I I I I I I I 18 I I 13 I 87 I 31 I I I 96 1214 I 0 1 I 1 B I I 2 1 I 2 I 0 1 I 0 1 I 1 B I I 8 I 2 1 I 14 I I I 0 1 I 2 1 1 lB I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I *MH -Mobile Home \ � ', (^ ).- Z't�' �_� n��'�41i'��`•N�'.�..��.° :.� �"•_ M_ t,ye4�Y"?_r •n�j�� f_'D"*'fi.5". p ' �..- ..