12/02/1986 - City Council RegularADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 2, 1986
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY ATTORNEY
There are no items to consider.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
There are no items to consider
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Project 481, Blueberry Circle
Schedule
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
i
(Storm 'Sewer Construction
1. Project 481, Blueberry Circle (Storm Sewer Construction
Schedule) --At the November 18 meeting, the Council deleted Project
481 from Contract 86-27 which provided for the installation of the
storm sewer in Blueberry Circle due to the fact that the low bidder
for the overall contract which included another project did not
provide the best price for Blueberry Circle. At that time, the low
contractor for Blueberry Circle indicated he would be willing to
guarantee his price for construction if he could start
"immediately".
Due to the delay in receiving the executed agreements from the three
property owners regarding the revised amounts, the contractor no
longer is willing to perform the work yet this year for his quote of
$12,333. The next lowest contractor is $13,774 or an increase of
approximately $1400 who would perform the work yet this year.
If the work is delayed until next spring, the original low
contractor would still honor his prices plus provide a $400 credit
due to the elimination of a cold patch on Blueberry Lane.
The staff would like to receive direction from the Council whether
to delay, this construction until the spring of 87 or to proceed with
the second low bid at an additional cost of $1400.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Provide appropriate direction
to staff regarding the scheduling of Project 481 (Blueberry Circle -
Storm Sewer).
ITIONAL INFORMATION
It was brought to my attention that Page 4, the list of contractor
licenses, was missing from some of the packets. Enclosed and
referenced as page 4 is a copy of that list.
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES
DECEMBER 2, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
1 . Domain Constructors, Inc.
2. Jeff Scherer Construction
HEATING h VENTILATING
1. Blaine Heating, Air. Conditioning & Electric, Inc.
2. Master Mechanical, Inc.
MASONRY, CEMENT WORK
1. Dan Dietrich Construction, Inc.
PLUMBING
1. Hopkins Plumbing & Heating
a
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY BALL
DECEMBER 2, 1986
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - BOLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III., 6:40 - DEPARTMENT READ BUSINESS
A. Fire Department
B. Parks and Recreation Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
F>.3 A. Contractors Licenses
?,S B. Personnel Items
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
T. & A. Public Hearing to Vacate Portion of Coachman Road Extension
Hampton Heights (Continued from November 18, 1986, Meeting)
B. Public Hearing for Project 482, Nancy Circle - Streets
C. Public Hearing for Project, 483, SuperAmerica/Splashland - Trunk
Water Main
VI. OLD BUSINESS'.
F. -Z9 A. Conditional Use Permit (ABF Freight System) for a Pylon Sign for a
Trucking Company on Lots 3-6, Plainview Addition Located South of
Hwy #55, Abutting Lexington Avenue on the West, W 1/2 of Sec 2
24 B. Kennel License Renewals
VII. NEW BUSINESS
? A( A. Resolution Establishing Fees for Various City Services for 1987
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
P(,i A. Public Improvement Contract
1. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #1, Holland Lake - Trunk
Storm Sewer
f -G.2,2. Contract 85-21, Approve Change Order #3 (Maintenance Building)
B. Developers Task Force Recommended Policy for Temporary Advertising
Signs
C. Private Improvement Contract
�•'1 `j 1. Contract 83-K, Final Acceptance (Brittany 6th)
�>.rlol 2. Contract 84-T,. Final Acceptance (Brittany 7th)
IB. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
X. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUMCILMEMBERS
FROM:. CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
After approval is given to the December 2, 1986 agenda and
regular City Council meeting minutes for the November 18 and
special minutes for the November 13 meetings, the following items.
are in order for consideration:
J,DEP.ARTMENT`.HEADS�BUSINESS;;
A. FIRE DEPARTMENT
Ken Southern was recently elected as Fire Chief to a three (3)
year term which officially begins December 1, 1986. Also David
DiIoia was elected District 1 Chief to fill Ken Southern's
vacancy which is two years on a three year term. Fire Chief
Southern and District 1 Chief DiIoia will be officially sworn in
Tuesday evening. There is no official action required on this
item.
B. PARKS S RECREATION DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --The Parks and
Recreation Commission is ,recommending to the City Council an
authorization for the Eagan Snowmobile Club to use a portion of
the Highline trail corridor and the boulevards on Johnny Cake
Ridge Road south of Cliff for snowmobile trail access This
trail access allows snowmobilers to use the Dakota
County/Lebanon Hills Regional Park which includes a designation
for snowmobile trails. For a review of the Parks and Recreation
Commission's action on this item, refer to a memo prepared by the
Director of Parks and'Recreation found on page -1--.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/disapprove
Eagan Snowmobile Club request for the use of the Highline trail
and Johnny Cake Ridge Road for snowmobile trail access.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: REN VRAA
DIRECTOR OF PARRS AND
DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1986
SUBJECT: SNOWMOBILE TRAIL USE REQUEST
Background - the last 4 or 5 winter seasons, the Eagan Snowmobile
Club has annually requested the use for a.portion of the Highline
trail corridor and the boulevards on JohnnyCake Ridge Road south
of Cliff for snowmobile trail access. This trail access Dakota
County/Lebanon Hills Regional Park for snowmobile use.
• Ad,visory._PaEji and Recreation Commission's Review - At the
November 6 Advisory Commission meeting, the Commission received
a request from the Eagan Snowmobile Club and Mr. Maynard Ohm
asking the Commission and City to again designate these trails as
access to Dakota County Park. All conditions previously
developed, including annual review of said trails, were agreed
to. The Advisory Commission noted some problems with
snowmobiles, determined that said problems were not necessarily a
direct result of the use of the Highline Trail and JohnnyCake
Ridge Boulevard. Therefore, Advisory Commission, with one member
voting no, is recommending to the City Council that the Eagan
Snowmobile Club again be granted permission to utilize JohnnyCake
Ridge Road/Highline Trail as previously designated for access
trail to Dakota County Regional Park.
® For Council Action - To approve/disapprove Eagan Snowmobile Club
request for the use of the Highline Trail and JohnnyCake Ridge
Road for snowmobile trail access.
DirecCdr.-o-f Parks and Recreation
KV/cks
v
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
There are two (2) items on the agenda referred to as
consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If
the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed under additional items unless the discussion required is
• brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSES
•
A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who hav-e een selected and
retained as the builder by a customer either living in or
planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors
have references from other municipalities or their client permit
applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor
license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS, ITEM: To approve the contractor
licenses as presented,.
3
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council.Meeting
Page Three
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1, Clerk=Typist/Admi•nistration--The City has received a
letter of resignation from Corrine Smith, a clerk -typist in the
typing pool in Administration, effective December 3, 1986, as
she has accepted another position with a small law firm.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the letter of
resignation of Corrine Smith and to authorize advertisement for a
• part-time clerk -typist for the typing pool in Administration. .
Item 2, Planning Ai -de --The City has received a letter of
resignation from Julie Dykstra, the planning aide in the Planning
Department, effective January 2, 1987. She has accepted a
position with a development company.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEMr To accept the resignation
of Julie Dykstra and to authorize advertisement to fill the
vacant planning aide position.
Item 3, Clerk-Typist/Protective Inspections Department --
Approximately 20 applications were received for the vacant clerk -
typist position in the Protective Inspections Department. After
screening, 11 applicants were tested and interviewed by Chief
Building Official Peterson, Inspections and Parks secretary
•
Severson and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their
recommendation that Nancy Severson (no relation) be hired to fill
this vacant position. Ms. Severson has successfully passed the
City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Nancy Severson as a clerk -typist in the Protective Inspections
Depa-rtment. The appointment would be effective as of November
25, 1987.
r
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Four
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VACATE PORTION OF COACHMAN ROAD EXTENSION - HAMPTON HEIGHTS
A. Public Hearing to Vacate Portion of Coachman Road Extension -
Hampton Heights --We have received a petition from the developer
of the Hampton Heights Addition to vacate that portion of
Coachman Road that has been abandoned through its realignment as
a part of the Hampton Heights subdivision. Enclosed on page
is a map showing the location of that portion of Coachman 40
Road to be vacated. It should be noted that only the road right-
of-way is being vacated and the City is retaining drainage and
utility easement sufficient to cover its existing utilities. All
notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all potentially affected utility companies. As of this date,
staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Coachman Road
Extension through the Hampton Heights and authorize the Mayor. and
City Clerk to execute all related documents..
I
V1 I
i3rld 63-TUY 3
•-1r
I
PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION
.1.11 Ell
That part of recorded easement Document No. 6214640 described
as follows:
A perpetual easement for roadway purposes over, under and
across the east 30.00 feet of the west 530.00 feet of the
north 1742.4 feet of said east half of the northwest quarter
(E 3� of NA) .
"Gay ISHI'd SIHS13H
Ail/6I S
7
I 'N'
sit
2
V1 I
i3rld 63-TUY 3
•-1r
I
PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION
.1.11 Ell
That part of recorded easement Document No. 6214640 described
as follows:
A perpetual easement for roadway purposes over, under and
across the east 30.00 feet of the west 530.00 feet of the
north 1742.4 feet of said east half of the northwest quarter
(E 3� of NA) .
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Five
PROJECT 482. NANCY CIRCLE - STREETS
B. Project 482, Nancy Circle - Streets --In response to a
petition received by the residents on Nancy Circle to upgrade
this gravel road cul-de-sac to City standards with bituminous
surfacing and.concrete curb and gutter, the Council authorized
the preparation of the Feasibility Report which was presented at
• the November 6 meeting with the public hearing being scheduled
for December 2. Enclosed on pages through-
/� is a copy
of the Feasibility Report for the Council^s infir-mation and
reference during this public hearing.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all property owners proposed to be assesseed under this
project.
Our consultant engineer will discuss the details of this project
and be available to answer any''questions that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny Project 4'82 (Nancy Circle - Streets).
•
•
REPORT
FOR
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1986
FILE No. 49402
BO'NESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612-636.4600
October 22, 1986
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Nancy Circle
Street Improvements
Project No. 482
Our File No. 49402
Dear Mayor and Council:
Engineers & Architects
Ono G. Bonnnuu, P.E.
Nubrn W. N., P.E.
Jwryh C. Andrrlik. P.E.
Bla fJ d A. Lemhrrh, P.E.
Richard E. Tumrr, P.E.
Juma C. Ohun, P.E.
Glrnn R. Cook. P.E.
Krish A. Gwdun, P.C.
Th. E. N.,, P.E.
NhNurd W. Fwlrr, P.E.
Noon G. SchuNrhl. P.E.
M..,in L. Surmlu, P.E.
Uuno/d C. B....N'. P.£.
J,,ry A. Bourdun. P.E.
Murk A. Nawun, P.E.
Trd K. FWd. P.E.
Mn'hod T. Noulmunn, E£
Nub" N. P/�1Jr"r. VE.
m o. Lwkmu. P.E.
Th.. W. P"rrsun, P.E.
MirhW C. Lynch, P.E.
K,. L. Willa. P.E.
Jomn R. Muland. P.E.
Krnnrlh P. Andrrsun, P.E.
A'rilh A. &,h nn, P.E.
Murk R, MI.. P. E.
Rub"C. Nuark, A.I.A.
Thw w E. Anhw, Y.S.
&uu L. Tuunk, P.E.
Churl. A. EmL..
Lm M. Powhky
Harlon M. oh.
Sawn M. EMdm
Enclosed is our report for Nancy Circle, Project No. 482. This report covers
street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
EON4STROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK ti ASSOCIATES, INC.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
7 Date: October 22, 1986
Approved by: 1 ,
epartment of Public Works
Date: // ,7-
0117e
/0
30 Year
Annivers^ry
Reg. No. 14260
•
•
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
7 Date: October 22, 1986
Approved by: 1 ,
epartment of Public Works
Date: // ,7-
0117e
/0
30 Year
Annivers^ry
Reg. No. 14260
•
•
SCOPE: This project provides for street improvement of Nancy Circle east of
Nichols Road within Tousignant's First Addition. The proposed improvement
would include upgrading Nancy Circle to City of Eagan residential street stan-
dards with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving. Nancy Circle is
abutted by six single family, platted parcels.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION: Nancy Circle is an existing 26' wide gravel street ending in an
® approximate 35' radius cul-de-sac. Water main and sanitary sewer for Nancy
Circle were installed under the 1971 City Improvement Project No. 64.. In 1979
storm sewer was installed east of Tousignant's First Addition with a catch
basin manhole located as indicated on Figure 1.
For this project, it is porposed to upgrade Nancy Circle to a 28' wide bi-
tuminous street and 40' radius •bituminous cul-de-sac with concrete curb and
gutter. In addition, it is proposed to construct a catch basin and storm
sewer line from the east end of the cul-de-sac to the existing catch basin
manhole.
® It is assumed, for purposes of this report, that the existing aggregate
base is not of sufficient depth and cross-section to be fully utilized in the
upgrading of the street. Minor excavation of the street will be required to
bring it to proper elevation and cross section. Therefore, we have estimated
installation of an additional 4+ inches of aggregate base along with a minor
amount of common excavation required for curb installation. However, as part
of the preparation of the plans and specifications, a more detailed analysis
will be accomplished to better evaluate the depth and cross section of the ex-
isting aggregate base to determine the amount of additiona base required.
Page 1.
0117e
EASEMENTS: A 10' storm sewer easement along with a temporary construction
easement will be required over either lot 3 or 4 depending on where the storm
sewer is located.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
Assessment and Construction Area
Lots 1-6, Block 1, Tousignant's First Addition
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $32,770 which
includes contingencies and all related overhead but no easement acquisition
is
costs. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering,
administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located
at the back of this report. All 'costs will be revised based on final costs.
The assessments will be .spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate
will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment
hearing. It is proposed to assess the project costs equally on a per lot
basis to all lots within Tousignant's First Addition. •
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are esti—
mated to be as follows:
Street Assessment
TOTAL ................
Project Cost
Revenue
$32,770
$32,770
$33,770
$32,770
Balance
All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there
are no funds required from the major street fund.
Page 2.
0117e
�v
•
•
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estates Taxes
0117e
Page 3.
/3
November 6, 1986
December 2, 1986
Winter, 1987
Spring, 1987
Summer, 1987
September, 1987
May, 1988
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 482
LUMP
SUM
Clear 6 Grub @ L.S.
$ 200
150
Cu.yds.
Common Excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd.
750
50
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu.yds.
250
1
Each
Catch basin @ $900.00/each
900
80
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm Sewer @ $35.00/lin.ft.
2,800
1
Each
Cut—in to existing CBMH @ $300.00/each
300
300
Ton
Class 5 Aggregate Base (streets) @ $7.00/ton
2,100
50
Ton
Class 5 Aggregate Base (driveways) @ $10.00/ton
500
90
Ton
2331 Bituminous Base Course @.$13.50/ton
1,215
90
Ton
2341 Bituminous Wear Course @ $14.50/ton
1,305
11
Ton
Bituminous Materia_1 for Mixture @ $180.00/ton
1,980
50
Gals.
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat @ $1.50/gal.
75
550
Lin.ft.
B618 Concrete Curb 6 Gutter @ $6.00/lin.ft.
3,300
130
Sq.yds.
6" Concrete Driveway @ $30.00/sq.yd.
3,900
130
Sq.yds.
2" Bituminous Driveway @ $12.00/sq.yd,
1,560
1
Each
Adjust'G.V. Box @ $75.00/each
75
1,400
Sq.yds.
Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd.
2,800
TOTAL
$24,010
+5% Contingencies
1,200
$25,210
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest
7,560
TOTAL.............................................
$32,770
Page 4
0117e
i
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 482
Parcel Description No. Lots
Tousignant's First Addition
Lots 1-6, Block 1 6
0117e
Page 5.
/J-7/
Total
Rate/Lot Assessments
$5,462 $32,770
w
Z)
z
w
Q
N
J
O
U
r4
2 3
PROP SED STOR SEWER
NANCY CI R LE
I
A
j -EXISTING
42' STORM
I SEWER
A
I
PROPOSE10 STREET IM ROVEMENT
B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
30' BACK" 0 BACK .
6 5 4
TOUSIGNANT'S Ist. ADD.
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
do ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineers do Architects
St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: Oct. 86
Comm. 49402 11 Fig. No. 1
Agenda Information Memo,,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Six
PROJECT 483 . SQPERAMERICA/SPLASHLAND - TRUNK WATER MAIN
C. Project 483, S uperAmer ica/Spl ash land - Trunk Water Main --With
the proposed development of the Splashland Addition, the
developer was going to install the required 12 inch water main
from Cedar Avenue through this development to his connection at
Trunk Highway 13. Because this would have involved an inner
connection between two major pressure zones in the City, the
• developer petitioned for the installation of the appropriate
pressure reducing station.
Subsequently, the developer has withdrawn from his proposed
development and will no longer be installing the required 12 inch
trunk water main. Therefore, the petition was expanded to
incorporate this 12 inch water main in addition to the pressure
reducing station to service not only the future development of
the Splashland property, but adjacent properties'as well.
Enclosed on pages �through is a copy of the
Feasibility Report for the Council's -information and reference
during this public hearing. All notices have been published in
the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to
be assessed under this project.
Representatives of our consultant engineering firm will be
•
available to discuss this project and answer any questions that
may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny Project 483 (Super-America/Splashland -
Trunk Water Main).
17.
FOR
SUPERAMERICA
• (SPLASIILAND WATER PARK
TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
•
PROJECT.No.483
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1986
FILE NO. 49403
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 81 ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk water main improve-
ments along Sibley Terminal Drive in the vicinity of Superamerica. The project
area is north of Diffley Road between Old Highway 13 and Cedar Avenue Freeway.
The area is zoned agriculture and general business.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the toaster Utility Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of a 12 inch trunk
water main and a pressure reducing station. The 12 inch trunk water main will
connect an existing trunk stub along the west side of the Cedar Avenue Freeway
•
north of Diffley Road to the existing trunk main at the intersection of Sibley
Terminal Drive and Old Highway 13. The main will be located along the south
side of Sibley Terminal Drive. In addition, a water service will be installed
to Parcel 010-52 (Buckeye Gas Products Company).
The pressure reducing station will be located within the boulevard area of
Old Highway 13. The station will be required to control the pressure within
the area after the looping of the existing 12 inch trunk main is completed.
The water pressure will be controlled between the high pressure zone and the
intermediate
•
pressure zone at an elevation of 950.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED: The construction and assessment areas will be:
Construction Area
SW 1/4 Section 19
Parcel 015-50
Parcel 010-52
Parcel 011-54
Parcel 011-57
Group W Addition
011le
Assessment Area
SW 1/4 Section 19
Parcel 015-50
Parcel 011-51
Parcel 011-54
Parcel 011-57
Parcel 010-52
Parcel 013-56
Group W Addition
S S W Industrial Acres, Block 1
Lot 1
Lot 2
Outlot A
EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary construction easements will be required
over Parce1.015-50 for cosntruction of the main from the existing stub along
the west side of the freeway to Sibley Terminal Drive. Easements will be
obtained as part of the platting of. Parcel 015-50 with no additional.
anticipated coat to the project.
PERMITS: Construction permits from Mn/DOT will be required for construction
along the freeway and within Old Trunk Highway 13 right-of-way.
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Pressure Reducing Station $21,840
• Trunk Water Main 74,260
Water Service 1,210
TOTAL $97,310
The total estimated project cost is $97,310 which includes contingencies
and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30 percent and
include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against benefited
properties and a preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. The
® assessments are' proposed to be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest
rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of final assessment
hearing.
WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess properties that abut Sibley Terminal
Drive a lateral benefit from trunk where no Lateral benfit has been previously
assessed. Where it has been previously assessed, 150' corner lot credits would
be applied. Trunk area water assessments are proposed to be assessed against
011le
those areas not previously assessed under other projects. These areas are
indicated on the attached drawings. The water service is proposed to be
assessed to the property that is served with the final assessment based on
actual construction costs.
Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as
follows:
Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main
Commerical and Industrial $39.14/F.F.
Trunk Area Water Main
.Commercial and Industrial $3,020/Ac.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to
cover the cost
of this project are
as follows:
Item
.'Project Cost Revenue
Balance
Pressure Reducing Station.
$21,840
Trunk Water Main
.74,260
'Water Service
1,210
Trunk Area Water Assessment
$167,519
Lateral Benefit Assessment
99,484
Service Assessment.
1,210
$97,310
$268,213
+$170,903
There will be a remaining balance of
$170,903 from this
project to be
added to the Trunk Water Main
Fund.
Z� 3 -
011le
U
u
•
L
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Receive Bids/Award Contract
Construction completion
Assessments Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
011le
- 4 -
Z, Z—
November 6
December 2
Spring 1987
Summer 1987
Fall 1987
Winter 1987
May 1989
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SUPERAMERICA (SPLASHLAND WATER PARK)
TRUNK WATER MAIN
PROJECT NO. 483
A. PRESSURE REDUCING STATION
LUMP SUM Pressure Reducing Station @ L.S.
LUMP SUM Surface Restoration @ L.S.
+ 5% Contingencies
+ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL PRESSURE REDUCING STATION .........
B. TRUNK WATER MAIN
LUMP SUM Clear and Grub Curb and Street @ L.S.
30 L.F. Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter @ $5.00/L.F.
80 S.Y. Remove Bituminous Surfacing @ $2.00/S.Y.
1,700 L.F. 12" DIP Water Main @ $21.00/L.F.
30 L.F. 6" DIP Water Main @ $15.00/L.F.
1 Each 12".x 12".Wet Tap w/ Gate Valve @ $2,000.00/Each
2 Each 12" Butterfly Valve @ $750.00/Each
3 Each 6" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve @ $350.00/Each
1 Each Salvage and reinstall 12" DIP Plug @ $150.00/Each
3,200 Lbs. ' Fittings @ $1.00/Lbs.
3Each Hydrant @ $1,000.00/Each
20 L.F. .Salvage & Reinstall Chain Link Fence @ $10.00/L.F.
30 L.F. B618 Concrete Curb. 5 Gutter @ $7.00/L.F.
80 S.Y. Bituminous Surfacing @ $25.00/S.Y.
20 L.F. Salvage b Reinstall 12" RCP @ $20.00/L.F.
1,730 L.F. Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/L.F.
2 Acres Seed @ $1,000.00/Acre
+ 5% Contingencies
+ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL TRUNK WATER MAIN ..................
5 -
011le 7-3
$15,000
1,000
$16,000
800
$16,800
5,040 •
$21,840
$ 500
150
160
35,700
450
2,000
1,500
1,050
150
3,200 •
3,000
200
210
2,000
400
1,730
2,000
$54,400
2,720
$57,120
17,140
$74,260
C. WATER SERVICE
60
L.F.
1"
Type "K" Copper Water Service @ $7.00/L.F.
$
420
1
Each
1"
Corporation Stop @ $30.00/Each
30
1
Each
1"
Curb Stop @ $80.00/Each
80
30
Ton
Cl.
5 Aggregate, 100% Crushed Quarry Rock @ $10.00/Ton
300
60
L.F.
Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/L.F.
60
$
890
+ 5% Contingencies
40
•
$
930
+ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
280
•
011ie
TOTALWATER SERVICES ............................... $1,210
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
SUPERA14ERICA (SPLASHLAND WATER PARK)
TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 483
A. TRUNK AREA WATER MAIN ASSESSMENT
Parcel Description Area
(Acre)
SW 1/4, Section 19
Total
Rate/Acre Assessment
Parcel
015-50
8.64
$3,020
$ 26,093
Parcel
011-54
8.96
3,020
27,059
Parcel
011-57
20.17
3,020
60,913
Parcel
011-51
1.86
3,020
5,617
Parcel
013-56
0.15
3,020
453
S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES, BLOCK 1
Lot 1
8.62
$ 3,020
$ 26,032
Lot 2
6.83
3,020
20,627
Outlot
A
0.24
3,020
725
TOTAL
.............
$167,519
B. LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
Assessable
Total
Parcel
Description
Footage
Rate/F.F.
Assessment
(Front Foot)
SE 1/4,
SECTION 19
Parcel
015-50
1200 (1)
39.14
$ 46,968
Parcel
010-52
215 (2)
39.14
8,415
Parcel
011-54
50.47
39.14
1,975
Parcel
011-57
730.29 (2)
39.14
28,584
Group W Addition
346 (3)
39.14
13,542
TOTAL.......
$99,484
7 -
011le L—�
(1) Front footage only for portion of parcel SE of Sibley Terminal
Drive. Actual footage to be determined based on finallocation of
water main.
(2) Corner lot credit of 150' applied.
(3) Unbuildable and corner lot credits of 504' applied.
C. SERVICE ASSESSMENT
Total
Parcel Description Number Services Assessment
Parcel 010-52 1 $1,210
•
011le
8 -
G�
Parcel
Description
SW 1/4, SECTION 19
Parcel 015-50
Parcel 011-54
Parcel 011-57
Parcel`011-51
Parcel 013-56
Parcel 010-52
Group W Addition
SUMMARY PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
Trunk Area Lateral Benefit Service
26,093
46,968
27,059
1,975
60,913
28,584
5,617
453
8,415
13,542
S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES, BLOCK 1
Lot 1 26,032
Lot 2 20,627
Outlot A 725
011le
9 -
z7
1,210
TOTAL.............
Total
Assessment
73,061
29,034
89,497
5,617
453
9,625
13,542
26,032
20,627
725
268,213
E
•
at•a
I..Y
1
1
1
PR O:
RED CIb
• 1
W
N
2
J
Q4
L
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING PRESSURE.
REDUCING STATION
1
CPO
3 a w
ATIO AO&S '
// YtRI
N■ I
I
PROPOSED 12 DIP
WATER MAIN I ■
I . •d .ar d
o■.n W I C] r®
c� I�
I �
ASSESSMENTS LEGEND 1z
® TRUNK AREA "■' IQ
D No. 30 --- LATERIAL BENEFIT DIF FL ROAD
ry ma
ma
Y■a
SUPERAMERICA (SPLASHLAND BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK
WATER PARK) Engineersem& Architects
IUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota
PROJECT NO. 483Date: NOV. ee -]L FIG. 1
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49403
Z
m
y
-- CARNELWN LANE
5 �xr1P�
1O a
CEDAR
1
1
.
I
■
L-- SAPPHIRE LANE
4
a• `
I
1
■ OPME
I
I
1
SUPERAMERICA (SPLASHLAND BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK
WATER PARK) Engineersem& Architects
IUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota
PROJECT NO. 483Date: NOV. ee -]L FIG. 1
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49403
Z
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986-, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN FOR ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS
A. Conditional Use Permit (ABF Freight Systems) for a Pylon Sign
for a Truck Company on Lots 3 - 6, Plainview Addition --A public
• hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their
last regular meeting held on October 28, 1986 to consider a
Conditional Use Permit application submitted by ABF Freight
Systems for a pylon sign located along Lexington Avenue, north of
the E -Z Airpark facility. The Advisory Planning Commission is
recommending approval of this application.
This item was reviewed by the City Council at their November 1-8
meeting. There were a number of questions raised about the
pending assessments that will be assessed against ABF Freight
Systems as a condition of the pylon sign approval. Due to the
absence of the applicant, this item was continued until the
December 2, 1986 meeting.
The applicant has been notified and is planning to be present.
For additional information on this item refer to the planning
40 depa tment report. A copy is enclosed on pages _136 through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Conditional Use Permit as presented by ABF Freight Systems for a
pylon sign.
Z�
CITY OF EAGAN
®ASSESSMENTS: Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Plainview Subdivision were
assessed the following trunk area assessments:
Project # Description Usage
12 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Commercial
14/179 Water Area Commercial
(1) 302 Storm Sewer Trunk Commercial
The following assessments are proposed as a condition for the
issuance of the conditional use permit:
Description Project # Usage Rate Quantity Amount
Trailway C/I $11.81/FF 485 FF $ 5,727.85
Street C/I 78.45/FF 485 FF 38,048.25
Storm Sewer Trunk (1) 302 C/I $ .075/SF 74,693 SF 5,601.98
(1) To correct the understatement of areas when Project #302 was assessed.
30
SUBJECT:
CONDITIONAL USE
APPLICANT:
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS
LOCATION:
LOTS 3-6 PLAINVIEW ADDITION, NW 1/4 SECTION.2
EXISTING ZONING:
L. I. (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
OCTOBER 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT:
OCTOBER 17, 1986
REPORTED BY:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•APPLICATION
SUMMARY: An •application has been submitted by ABF
Freight Systems requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon
sign located along Lexington
Avenue just north of the E -Z Airpark
facility.
The proposed. interior lighted pylon will be 22' tall with a
two sided 6' x 8' (42 sq.
ft.) signage area. This sign will
be a minimum 300' from the
E. Z; Airpark pylon and 10' within
the property as Code requires.
On December 3, 1985, the
City Council •approved a Conditional
Use for outside storage of
vehicles at this location. At that
time a condition required
an updated Landscape Plan approved'
by City Staff. A plan was submitted, approved, but not implemented
by the owners.
®ASSESSMENTS: Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Plainview Subdivision were
assessed the following trunk area assessments:
Project # Description Usage
12 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Commercial
14/179 Water Area Commercial
(1) 302 Storm Sewer Trunk Commercial
The following assessments are proposed as a condition for the
issuance of the conditional use permit:
Description Project # Usage Rate Quantity Amount
Trailway C/I $11.81/FF 485 FF $ 5,727.85
Street C/I 78.45/FF 485 FF 38,048.25
Storm Sewer Trunk (1) 302 C/I $ .075/SF 74,693 SF 5,601.98
(1) To correct the understatement of areas when Project #302 was assessed.
30
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS - CONDITIONAL USE.
PAGE 2
CONDITIONS•
1. Implementation of the previously submitted Landscape Plan,
approved on December 3, 1985.
2. The one time Sign Fee of $2.50/square foot.
3. All applicable Sign Ordinances.
4. The applicant shall either pay the assessment amounts or
execute a waiver of hearing to have them spread as special
assessments.
E
•
A"MiNV
g6Vv OW 1.J,�lt (. c
Q LICK p�KC wl'V
i
E.' DFEY
3v
AyTTq �f+i4AlY � �R '
- � RaaAKj-PfA.OVG CCM
wDp. rE-yuu TC
W.TiYL. �}YVC. al1C-
Py+T. M�YER !YE �. 4nnR2
a.wrvvnur� (Dour c+v e� Duro
IlVPMaO
DT� TYJ'T PVF¢
).R:OA Bei IJ l0 fSTrN MR8?SL.
-� Goo .w LJ.YE� DF VK..nlE9
�,w u.uro 4
cora m r c�src- A z• vnose aaw.
DML. p�CCFLLl YIT� �rGIPIBO �
/1WJf11w' GN—
J�
PLANTING DETAIL'
aA-0
1a-A�1,ae-
MY 4+
I -DCW O.C.
`r+�rrNh uues�
t' O.C.
TW /NWif✓
-s
��BUILDIN w. -?p �
_N+xW inywD(L�
��wxw, uw uR NfEi
2750 SO. LEXINGTON - PLANTING PLAN S FENCE LAYOUT
U
U
1 COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
isizE
I TYVE
A
M
WPW N � "A
R�MW» RNYM.vN.W+h
%N')lWJJf '2lR(M'
LK'-
ce
I ■
L
wm4hy NYLL
ir1I1 RKNYVfA
avt
to
C
4
WLNLO &1 m V?"
MMA N eAlk) ILUZA
v
VD
0
1
e^m �P
(onAri 1TOIT i]WA
fl.^Ar Lh In M n
L1l
Nf
PLANT
FENCE 18
1
1a AMa. OIAYATE) r(�
)AORIRY LOS � � f
eua�
r_�
•
APC Minutes
October 28, 1986
Harrison moved,
the November meeting
Planning Commission
further information
the Commission that
meeting and the pr
days to review the
necessary, at the n
were specifically
acre and the highris ,
zoning in light of the Comprehens v
problems with requests for additional
information was requested from st
Agreement and the maximum density all
that may have occurred. All voted in
Voracek seconded the motion to continue
There was discussion in regard to
continue the matter on it own
be n essary at the next meeting. I[
the applicant had requested the
pre m tint, and thus the. Co ission
request or rezoning, call' g for
ext Plannin Commission mee ing. Sta
directed to address the ' sue of den
e building i addition t the need f
the application to
the ability of the
initiative, should
was the opinion of
continuance at this
would still havii 60
a continuance,` if
ff and the developer
dens
of 25 units per
or more commercial
id Amendment process, and City-wide
tial zoning. In addition, further
in regard to the Blackhawk Park PUD
thereunder, and any density swaps
ADVENT UNITED METHODISZ CHURCH -
USE PERMIT
The public hearing in rega to the reque of Advent United Methodist
Church ,for conditional use per it for a sign in exc ss of 7 feet in height was
then convened by Chairper n McCrea. Mr. Dale unkle indicated that the
proposed sign met all City rdinance requirements, rel tive to signs. There
being no appearance o/Hai
alf of the applicant or he public, the public
hearing was closed. son moved, Wilkins seconded th motion to recommend
approval of the condiuse permit for the 25 foot sign made of Cedar with
two signage areas ofimately 4 feet in width, subject the condition
that the sign meet all City Code requirements, including set back from lot
lines. All voted in favor.
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairperson McCrea
upon the application of ABF Freight Systems for a conditional use permit for a
pylon sign, 22 feet in height, with two 6 by 8 foot signage areas on Lots.3
through 6, Plainview Addition in the northwest quarter of Section 2. City
Planner Runkle explained that the application was necessary because the sign
exceeded a 7 foot height limitation, and he provided the history of the use of
this parcel of property. He also indicated that the sign was 380 feet from
the nearest pylon sign owned by E-2 Airpark. The developer was present but
made no presentation. There was no one from the public requesting a hearing.
At the Commission's request, Mr. Runkle pointed out that the landscape plan
would be completed or a bond submitted for completion of it as a condition to
issuance of the conditional use permit.
Mr. Colbert addressed the issue of the $49,000.00 in assessments which had
been previously overlooked when improvements were installed for the benefit of
this parcel. The applicant indicated that he had just received this
information and was forwarding it to the owner's Corporate office.
3V-
2
APC Minutes
October 28, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1.. Implementation of the previously submitted Landscape Plan, approved on
December 3, 1985.
2. There shall be a one-time Sign Fee of $2.50 per square foot.
3. All applicable Sign Ordinances shall be adhered to.
4. The applicant shall either pay the assessment amounts or execute a
Waiver of.Hearing to have them spread as special assessments.
All voted aye.
OPUS CORPORATION - WAIVER OF PLAT •
Chairperson McCrea then convened the hearing in regard to the request for
waiver of plat by Opus Corporation for Lots 6 and 14, Eagandale Center
Industrial Park, and Lot 3, 'Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 7,
to combine Tract "A" with the parcels north of Tr t "B" for a road in Tract
"C" as a separate parcel located in part of the outhwest quarter of Section
3, east of Pilot Knob Road, off of Eagandale Blv City Planner Runkle
introduced the proposal, adv'sing that the c -de-sac had been constructed, .
although not deeded over to he City. Due to he need for the cul-de-sac and
existing construction, it had ecome a'house- eeping issue to make sure that
the street would be deeded t the City and that the leftover parcel be
attached to an existing parcel Hall mov d, Harrison seconded the motion to
recommend approval of the waiver f platsubject to all applicable code
provisions and a park dedication a of .02 per square foot. All voted yes.
NORTHWESTERN BELL "PHONE - WAIVER OF PLAT 0
Chairperson McCrea then conv ed he public hearing in regard to the
application of Northwestern Bell elepho a for a waiver of plat to split a .11
acre parcel from Parcel No. 022-26 or a utility building located in the
northwest quarter of Section 2 , we at of D\wa
d, abutting County Road #30.
Mr. Dale Runkle advised the ommission te exhibit packet was in.error
and indicated that the p rcel was somewrger in size. He also advised
that the building is under construction anthe other permits had been
obtained. It appeared t t the waiver ot was a house -keeping issue to
allow ownership of th parcel by Northweell. Mr. Michael Minenko was
present as attorney fo Northwestern Bell Mr. Robert Dokken: Mr.
Dokken indicated that./the original condise permit was requested in
December of 1985 froth the Planning Commissd proved by the City Council
in. February of 1986 with the recommendatit t parcel size be increased
to allow for setbacks. The waiver of plateede in order to record the
deed. There was no one present to object to the proposal and the public
hearing was closed. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the condition that adequate
landscaping be provided for all Northwestern Bell substation sites in the City
of Eagan. All voted yea.
3
k} •,y': H:.4
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 19'86, City Council Meeting
Page Eight
KENNEL LICENSE RENEWALS
B. Kennel License Renewals --There are several kennel licenses that
are in order for renewal consideration by the City Council. A list
of these licenses and the number of dogs that were authorized for
each location is enclosed on page 0-7 .
• There have been several complaints, including a formal complaint by
residents adjacent to the Abel's, about barking dogs. The
complaints were made to City Hall and the Eagan Police Department at
the time the City contracted with Abel's to operate the City's
animal pound. The animal pound was relocated from the Abel's
property to Lakeside Animal Hospital as of November 1, 1986. Since
November 1, there have been no complaints at City Hall or the
Policpartment regarding the Abel's kennel, see attached memo on
page— from Captain Geagan regarding the Abel kennel license. A
letter was sent to Mr. Robert, swanick of Orrin Thompson Homes
stating that the kennel license for M,r. and Mrs. Abel would be
acknowledged for the remainder of 1986. If there was a problem with
dogs barking, residents could present their objections to the
reissuance of the kennel license at a December meeting. Residents
are aware of the December 2 date for considering the ,kennel license.
For a copy of that letter, refer to pages through _4//�.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the kennel
licenses as presented for annual renewal.
1��
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1986
SUBJECT: KENNEL LICENSE RENEWALS - 1987
The following kennel license renewals are submitted for Council
approval:
William & Kim Abel
3506 Lexington Ave. S.
Kathleen Glibertson
3995 Dodd Road
Janis MacKimm
1690 County Rd. 30
® Donald Sandberg
1560 Yankee Doodle Rd.
,:37
Licensed in 1978. Approval
was given for 4 kennel and 2
house dogs.
Licensed in 1983. Approval
was given for 6 bassett
hounds.
Licensed in 1980. Specific
approval given for 20-25 dogs;
basset hound's, Russian wolf-
hounds, Scottish terriers,
dobermans, etc. License in
conformance.
Licensed in 1971. Approval
was given for 4 - 6 German
shorthairs.
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
cdimI.r von..
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
ndmimn...
KENNETH D. A52MANN
ow,.,I—C..mll
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
November 26, 1986
TO: Thomas Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Patrick Geagan, Captaih'
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR KENNEL RELICENSING BY
WILLIAM ABEL
On 11/1/86 the city moved it's impounded animals
from Bill Abel's kennel at 3506 Lexington Avenue
to Lakeside, Animal Hospital. I have researched
our files and have not been able to find any com-
plaints from Abel's neighbors since we've moved
the kennel. I called DTs. Judy Orchard and Mr.
Wittles,, who live, adjacent to the property. They
said the dogs continue to bark and they still find
it irritating and a nuisance.
Patrick Geagan
Captain
PG/kg
3�
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
ya_
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE; (612) 454-8100
October 9, 1986
MR ROBERT J SWANICK, EXEC V PRES
ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES
1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD
MINA MN 55313
Re: Petition to Consider D
Animal Pound at 3506 L
Dear Mr. Swanick:
t of the Citv's
BEA BLOMQUIST
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VIC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Memb rs
THOMAS HEDGES
CIN Mmininrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
CIN Cler0.
The City of Eagan received a petition several weeks ago from
residents in Country Homes of Lexington Place. The purpose'of the
petition was to raise a welfare concern about the noise polution
caused by dogs barking at the City's animal pound located at 3506
Lexington Avenue South and operated by Mr. and Mrs. William Abel.
A public: hearing was set for the October 21, 1986, City Council
meeting at which time testimony would be taken and consideration
given to pursuing other sites for the animal pound.
I am pleased -to inform you that the City has looked for new
locations and was successful in negotiating a contract with the
owners and operators of the Lakeside Animal Hospital, a veterinary
clinic located within the City. Mr. and Mrs. Abel have agreed to
cancel their contract with the City of Eagan effective November 1
of this calendar year. As of that date, November 1, 1986, all
animals picked up for impounding will be taken to the new location.
As a result of this action, the City Council is removing the
public hearing from the October 21 agenda as originally scheduled.
The contract between the City of Eagan and Lakeside Animal
Hospital will be ratified by City Council action at the October 21
meeting.
Since Mr. and Mrs. Abel have a kennel license valid through the
remainder of this calendar year, they will be given an opportunity
from November 1 through the month of December to continue operating
a kennel. During the month of December when the kennel licenses
are given consideration for renewal for 1987,. the City would
accept any testimony by residents if there is still a problem
remaining at the Abel'sresidence with the barking of dogs. Any
testimony and input at that time would be considered by the City
Council as they make their decision regarding the renewal of a
kennel license.
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
LETTER TO ROBERT SWANICH
OCTOBER 9, 1986
PAGE TWO
On behalf of the Eagan City Council, we are hopeful that this
action will minimize, if not eliminate, the noise polution that
the Lexington Place neighborhood has experienced during this past
calendar year.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Pat Geagan, Administrative Captain, •
Eagan Police Department
TLH/kf
f
•
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
RESOLUTION/ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES FOR CITY SERVICES
A. Resolution Establishing Fees for Various City Services for
1987--A list of City fees including assessment rates,, utility
billing rates for water and sewer services, and building permits
are among the several -page list of fees that are considered for
adjustment in 1987. The fees were presented and discussed at
length by the Director of Finance, City Administrator, and City
• Council at a special workshop session held on November 24, 1986.
There was a reduction proposed by the City Council of the
building permit fees, and questions raised throughout the
discussion and evaluation of the list of fees which have been
addressed by the Director of Finance. For a copy of his memo and
resol,oution to adopt the fees, refer to pages_ through
S For a copy of the 19'87 fee schedule as recommended by
the City staff and adjusted by the City Council, refer to pages
NSA through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM': To approve or deny the
resolution establishing the fees for various City services for
1987.
7�
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE
DATE: NOVEMBER.26, 1986
SUBJECT: FEE SCHEDULE
Please find attached the revised fee schedule based on our
discussion and subsequent direction from the Ctiy Council at the
special meeting of November 21, 1986.
The purpose of this memo is to highlight the changes that were
made and to provide additional background on the questions that
were asked.
I have added the false alarm fees outlined in the City Code to
the fee schedule again for the purpose of consolidating all fees •
in one document. There is no change in amount.
The bingo investigation fee should have been listed as gambling,
and has been changed accordingly. Per the State Charitable
Gambling Board, the investigation fee relates to all gambling
activities and would therefore be proper as it relates to the
Eagan pull tab ordinance.
I have discussed the contractors licensing situation with Dale
Peterson. It is his opinion that it would be very difficult to
try to license any subcontractors because they do not apply for
any permits with the City. He prefers that the general
contractor remain the responsible party. It would certainly be
possible to add additional categories to the licensed contractor
list, it would, however, significantly increase the
administrative effort, most of which would fall upon the
S inspectors as they worked out in the field. The City Code
presently excepts subcontractors of a currently licensed
contractor, which general contractor is -responsible for all work
performed.
The current insurance requirement as defined in the City Code
calls for liability insurance and implies that the City will be
named. as an additional insured. I do not believe that has been
routinely done but will be reviewed.
The City Code also calls for a $5.,000 surety bond operating in
favor of the City and conditional that the City will be saved
harmless from any loss or damage by reason of improper or
inadequate work performed by•the holder of said license. In
discussing the bond', and insurance with Bruce Medvec, I have come
to the conclusion that the City in accepting bonding company
forms is probably not getting what the Code calls, for. He also
feels that the City and not the homeowner would have to collect
on the bond and would have the most success in the public health,
safety and welfare area and not so much with faulty workmanship.
We are clearly not getting performance bonds which run to the
homeowner.
•
•
Fee Schedule
November 26, 1986
Page Two
It appears that the bonding and insurance requirements are
proving that the contractors can obtain the items but are not
being used for anything else. Since everything except the fee is
specifically set within the City Code, changes would require an
amendment to the Code. If desired, I would suggest an in-depth
review of the matter as a separate project.
I have, reviewed the proposed building permit fees to reflect a
15 - 20$ increase as directed by the City Council. The following
table is a comparison of the current and proposed new rates.
1982 - 1985 MODIFIED UBC PERMIT FEE
COMPARISON
TOTAL VALUATION
$1 - $500
$501 - $2,000
$2,000 - $25,000
$25,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000
$1,000,001 & Up *
UBC
REPRESENTATIVE FEES
MIDPOINT MODIFIED $
EXAMPLE 1982 1985 INCREASE
No Permit Required
$ 750
14.50
17.10
17.98
13,500
104.50
121.50
16.3$
37,500
228.50
266.10
16.5%
75,000
358.00'
416.00
16.2%
,-300,000
933.00
1103.50
18.3$
750,000
2058.00
2391.00
16.2%
2,000,000
5183.00
5328.50
2.8$
* Combined in 1982 Rates:
To $100,001 & Up
The building permit fees were last increased in June of 1981 when
the City went from the 1964 U.B.C. table to the 1979 U.B.C.
table. (There was no change in the U.B.C. tables in 1976, 1979
or 1982.)
The Building Inspections Department budget has increased from
$1,11,970. in 1981 to .$451,540 in the proposed 1987' budget.
Assuming that the relationship between permit fees and costs in
1981 was correct, the proposed fee increase is reasonable. Staff
has not had the time to complete a detailed study of costs
related more specifically to individual permits although more
work will be done in that area if the City Council so directs.
The per head notation on plumbing fixtures relates to the number
of shower heads in the property.
I have discussed the question of the 58 increase in the cost of
trailway construction with Tom Colbert. He noted that
contractors will not guarantee any 1987 rates because of their
�3
•
•
Fee Schedule
November 26, 1986
Page Three
fear of volatility in the prices. Given that uncertainty and
lacking a more detailed study; I think it would be appropriate to
proceed with this modest increase.
I believe that covers all the questions raised, if more
information is required, please let me know. Again, it is
important that action be taken at the December 2, 1986 City
Council meeting, so that appropriate parties can be notifiedof
the changes to be effective January 1, 1987.
9A V
® Finance irector/City Clerk
EJV/jeh
4
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VARIOUS
CITY SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
WHEREAS, various sections of the City Code provide for
fees to be established by Council resolution, and
WHEREAS, the City has incurred increased costs in
wages and materials and it is therefore necessary to increase
some of the costs to cover said increases; and
WHEREAS, certain fees are established in the City Code
and Changes require an amendment to the Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the fees as
listed in the attached shall be effective January 1, 1987;
• CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Motion Made By:
Seconded By:
Those in Favor:
Those Opposed:
Its Cler
•
• Dated: December 2, 1986 •
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this 2nd day of December, 1986.
E.J. Vanoverbeke, City Clerk
City Clerk
q5
FEE TYPE
Final Plat
SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING
1987
FEE
$100.00 Require Escrow
+$3/lot Deposits Per
Development Escrow
Policy
Preliminary Plat
300.00
Rezoning and Planned Dev.
250.00
PD -Annual Review
25.00
Conditional Use Permit
•
Initial
Renewal CUP
75.00
25.00
-
Variance
50.00
Waiver of Plat
100.00
Special Permit
50.00
Excavation Permit
250.00
Assessment Search
8.00
Vacation Proceedings
300.00
Industrial Revenue Bond and
Multifamily Housing Bond
Processing Fee
500.00
Zoning Map
3.00
Zoning Regulations (City Code-
10.00
Chapter 11)
Subdivision Regulations (City
10.00
Code -Chapter 13)
Traffic Regulations (City Code-
3.00
Chapter 8)
Parking Regulations (City Code-
3.00
Chapter 9)
Sign Regulations
2.50
City Code Each Chapter (All
5.00
Chapters Except 8,9,11,13)
Code Book
60.00
Code Book With Binder
75.00
�S A
BEER, LIQUOR AND WINE
Beer
Application and
Investigation
Off -Sale License
On -Sale License
Temporary License
Liquor
• Application and
Investigation
Off -Sale License
On -Sale License
Sunday License
On -Sale Club License
Less than '200
201-500
501-1,000
1,001-2,000
2,001-4,000
4,001-6,000
Over 6,000
Wine
Application and
Investigation
On -Sale License
Sunday License
Consumption and Display
Daily Sports or Convention
Duplicate License
FINANCE/CLERK
LIQUOR FEES
1987
FEE
$ 350.00(1)
40.00
175.00
25.00
300.00(2)
200.00
3,500.00
200.00
300.00
500.00
650.00
800.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
200.00(1)
200.00
100.00
25.00
50.00
2.00
(1)When Wine and Beer are applied for by the same applicant,
the total maximum investigation fee is $350.00.
(2)Also requires an escrow deposit of $1,000.00 for five persons
requiring investigation and $200 for each additional if ,the
investigation is conducted within Minnesota, or $2,000.00 for
five persons requiring investigation and $400.00 for each addi-
tional if the investigation is conducted outside of Minnesota.
x y�
•
E
FINANCE/CLERK
ADDITIONAL FEES
1987
FEE TYPE FEE
Gambling Investigation $ 250.00
Cigarette License 25.00
Mechanical Amusement
1-3 Machines 25.00
4-15 Machines' 200.00
15+ Machines 400,.00
1Y X17
•
•
Contractors Licenses
General Contractor
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
•
Heating, Ventilating
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Air Conditioning
& Certificate of Ins.
Masonry
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
Swimming Pool
$25.00 w/$5,,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
Roofing
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
Plumbing
MN Master License No.
& $2;000 Bond &
Certificate of Ins.
•
Sewer and Water
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Ins.
Well Driller
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Ins.
Day Care Permit (7-11)
25.00
1Y X17
•
•
•
E
FINANCE/CLERK
ADDITIONAL FEES
PACE 2
FEE TYPE
Rubbish Hauler
1st Truck
Each Additional
Service Station
Solicitors
Trailer Permit
Dog License
Male or Female,
Neutered or Spayed
Late Fee
Kennel Permit
Initial
Renewal
Photocopies
Fee Schedule
Animal Pick Up
Animal Impound
Permit Duplication Fee
Returned Check Fee
False Alarm
Commercial
Residential
1987
FEE
40.00
20.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
6.00 •
3.00
.50/mo
50.00
25.00
.50/page
2.00
10.00
2.00/day over amount
billed the City by
the pound
20.00
10.00
75.00 Per False Alarm
After 6 (City Code)
50.00 Per False Alarm
After 6 (City Code)
A- 4f
.•
i
FEE TYPE
Building Permit
Demolition Permit
Disposal Permit
Electrical Permit
Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning
Moving Permit
Plumbing and Gas Fitting
Sign Permit
Wind Energy, Radio and
Television Tower Permit
Plan Check (Valuation
over $10,000)
INSPECTION FEES
1987
FEE
See Attached (Modified 1985
Uniform Building Code)
15.00
10.00
See. Schedule Attached
See Schedule Attached
15.00 Plus Cost of
Repairs and Escrow
See Schedule. Attached
2.50 per S.F.
See Attached (Modified 1985
Uniform Building Code)
50% of Permit Fee
•
•
BUILDING PERMITS
CITY OF EAGAN
1987 PERMIT FEES & LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT FEES - RESIDENTIAL - Fees based on modified 1985 UBC Fee Schedule 50%
Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000.
Utility Charges - collected with permit fee
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $625.00
Water Availability Charge (WAC) - $525.00
Water Meter - $ 67.00
Road Unit Charge - $305.00
Treatment Plant Charge - $180.00
• $1.00 - $ 500.00 -- No Permit Required •
$501.00 - $ 2,000.00 -- $12.00 for the first $500.00 plus $1.70 for each
additional $100.00 or franation thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $37.50 for the first $2,000.00 plus $7.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof,
to and , including $25,000.00
$25,000.00 - $50,000.00 -- $198.50 for the first $25,000,00 plus $5.20 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 - $100,000.,00 -- $328.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3.50 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to
• and including $100,000.00
$100,000.00 - $500,000.00 -- $503.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000 -- $1,703.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $2.75
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00 and Up -- $3,078.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.25
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
FEES FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS (ONE COMMON ENTRANCE & ONE LAUNDRY FACILITY)
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - 80% of $625 x number of units
Water Availability Charge (WAC) - 80,% of $525 x number of units
Water Meter - N/A
Road Unit - 80% of $305 x number of units
b 3 D
-flJ5%
STATE SURCHARGE
ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS
Valuation
of Structure
Surcharge
Addition
or Alteration
Computation
$1,000,000
or Less
.0005.x
Valuation
$1,000,001
to $2,000,000
$ 500
+ .0004 x (Value
- $1,000,000)
$2,000,001
to $3,000,000
$ 900
+ .0003 x (Value
- $2,000,000).
$3,000,001
to $4,000,000
$1,200
+ .0002 x (Value
- $3,000,000)
$4,000,001
to $5,000,000
$1,400
+ .0001 x (Value
-,$4,000,000)
$5,000,001
and Up
$1,500
+ .0005 x (Value
- $5,000,000)
-flJ5%
•
•
1987 CITY OF EAGAN PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF FIXTURE TYPE OF FIXTURE
Water Closet @ $3.00 Ea.
Bath Tub @ $3.00
Lavatory @ $3.00 Ea.
Shower (Per Head) @ $3.00 Ea
Sink @ $3.00 Ea.
Urinal @ $3.00 Ea.
Bidet @ $3.00
Laundry Tub @ $3.00 Ea.
Janitor Sink or Receptor @ $3.00 Ea.
Water Heater @ $3.00 Ea.
Floor 'Drain @ $1.50 Ea.
Water Stand Pipe @ $1.50 Ea.
Gas Pipe Outlets @ $1.50 Ea.
Rough Openings - No Fixtures @$1.50 Ea
Fixtures on Rough Openings @ $1.50 Ea
COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES: 1,% of Contract Fee With a Minimum Fee
of $20.00. State Surcharge is $.50
Per Each $1,000 of Fee (Not the
Contract Cost).
$12.00 Minimum Fee
------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
1987 CITY OF EAGAN MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
RESIDENTIAL HEATING 01-100,000 BTU'S - $24.00, Each Additional
(Includes Cooling for New 50,000 BTU's or Fraction - $6.00
Construction)
RESIDENTIAL COOLING $12.00
(Add on)
MODIFICATIONS/ALTERATIONS $12.00 Minimum
COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES 1% of Contract Fee with a Minimum Fee of
$20.00. State Surcharge is $.50 Per Each
$1,000 of Fee (Not the Contract Cost)
•
•
CITY OF EAGAN
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FEES
NOTE: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR EACH INSPECTION - $10.00
ALL PERMI-TS REQUIRE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE
1. Payment of fees - All electrical inspection fees are due and payable to
the City of Eagan at or before commencement of the installation and shall
be forwarded to the City of Eagan.
2. The fees for signs shall be computed in accordance with State schedule
with a minimum fee of $10.00 per sign.
3. Swimming pool ground fees shall be computed separately at $30.00 per
pool.
4. Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installation, replacement,
alteration or repair limited to one inspection only - $10.00.
5. Services, change of services,. temporary services, additions, alterations
or repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed
separately.
1 to 100 ampere,capacity........................................... $12.00
101 to and including 200 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ....... $15.00
For each addition of 100 amperes or fraction thereof ................$ 5.00
6. Circuit, installations or additions, alterations or repairs of each
circuit or subfeeder shall be computed separately including circuits fed
from subfeeders and including the equipment served. Circuits of 250
volts or less.
•
0
to and
including 30 ampere capacity ..............................$
3.00
shall be computed separately at $2.00 per
unit
31
to and
including 100 ampere capacity ............................$
5.00
For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ........ $ 4.00
For circuits over 250 volts, double the fee for 250 volts or less.
%. In addition to the above fees:
a. A charge of $1.50 will be made for each street lighting standard.
b. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal head'.
Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when
computing the fee. ,
EM
8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers and generators
for
lights, heat and power
shall be computed separately at $2.00 per
unit
i
plus $.10 per KVA up to
and including 100 KVA, 101 KVA and over at
$.05
per KVA. The maximum
fee for any transformer or generator in
this
- category is $20.00.
EM
9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers for signs and outline
lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction
thereof per unit, plus $.25 for each additional 100 VA or fraction
thereof.
b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first
appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $7.50 per
unit.
15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or corporation begin work
of any kind such as, hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from
the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured
the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either
previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on
the next succeeding day where such work ,is commenced on a Saturday or on
a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit,
be required to pay double the fees hereinbefore provided for such permit,
and shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance.
Holders of contractor license shall not obtain permits for electric work
unless the work is supervised by them and is perfomed by workmen employed
by them or their firm. //
10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed
by the initial installer), remote controls, signal circuits, fire warning
and security circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00
per each ten openings or, devices of each system plus $1.00 for each
additional opening.
11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed installations,
there shall be a minimum fee of $100.00 up to and including $30,000 of
electrical estimate, plus 1/10 of 1% on any amount in excess of $30,000
to be paid by persons or firms requesting the review.
12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions
have been corrected and such conditions are not the subject of an appeal
pending before the Board or any court, a reinspection fee of not to
®
exceed the original unit fee, or $10.00, whichever is less, may be
assessed in writing by•the inspector.
13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested special inspections
or services, the fee shall be $15.00 per man hour, including travel time,
plus $.20 per mile traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of
material consumed.
K�
This section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such
other jobs as determined by the inspector.
14. For inspections of transient project including, but not limited to,
carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees shall be computed as follows:
a. Power supply units —According to Item 4(b) (2) of fee schedule -
a like fee will be required on power supply units at each engagement
®
during the season, except that a fee of $15.00 per hour will be
charged for additional time spent by the inspector if the power
supply is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on
the request for inspection as required by law.
b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first
appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $7.50 per
unit.
15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or corporation begin work
of any kind such as, hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from
the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured
the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either
previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on
the next succeeding day where such work ,is commenced on a Saturday or on
a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit,
be required to pay double the fees hereinbefore provided for such permit,
and shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance.
Holders of contractor license shall not obtain permits for electric work
unless the work is supervised by them and is perfomed by workmen employed
by them or their firm. //
16: Additional Fees and/or Fee Shortage - Additional fees and/or fee
shortages must be received by the City within 14 days of written notice.
Ciq If additional fees and/or fee shortages are not received within 14 days
<V of notice, permits for electrical installations will not be accepted by
the City until such time as the additional fees and/or shortages are
received. Additional fees and/or fee shortages that are not received
within 14 days of notice are subject to a 10% per day penalty.
�1
5-
FEE TYPE
Trunk Assessment
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Oversize
Unplatted
Platted Res.
Trunk Water Main
Oversize
Agricultural or
Residential
• Water Supply & Storage
& Main Oversizing
Comm. & Ind.*
Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize
Single Family
Multi -Family
Comm. & Ind.
ENGINEERING/ASSESSMENT
FEES
1987
FEE
$1,300/Ac.
625/Lot
1, 250/Ac.
600/Lot
11
3,170/Ac.
.053/S.F.
.067/S.F.
.079/S.F.
Lateral Benefit Assessment
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Sanitary Sewer 30.12/Centerline Foot
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Water Main
Single Family 24.94/Centerline Foot
Multi -Family
Comm. & Ind. 41.10/Centerline Foot
Street Assessment
Equivalent Zoning
STREET - Residential
Equivalent (321) 35.44/F.F.
Multiple Equivalent (44') 66.53/F.F.
Comm./Ind. Equivalent (521) 82.37/F.F.
TRAILWAY - (Concrete or '
Bituminous) 12.40/F.F.
* Main Oversizing Shall Be $1,250/Acre and
Water Supply and Storage Shall Be $1,920/Acre
'S4
ENGINEERING/ASSESSMENTS FEES
PAGE 2
1987
FEE TYPE' FEE
Lateral Storm Sewer
Equivalent Assessment Rate
Maintenance Equipment & Personnel
Foreman w/Pickup Truck
Single Axle Truck w/Operator
Tandem Truck w/Operator
Tractor w/Operator
Backhoe/Loader w/Operator
® Front End Loader w%Operator
Road Grader w/Operator
Foreman
Maintenance Person
Street Sweeper w/Operator
Topographic Maps
50KW Generator W/Operator
Sewer Jetter W/Operator
Sewer Rodder W/Operator
•
10.30/F.F.
42.00/Hr.
47.00/Hr.
52.00/Hr.
32.00/Hr.
52.00/Hr.
73.00/Hr.
73.00/Hr.
20.00/Hr.
17.00/Hr
58.00/Hr.
6.30/Acre
52.00/Hr.
58.00/Hr.
.t .50.00/Hr.
•
•
UTILITY RATES & FEES
Treatment Plant Charge 180.00
Water Supply & Storage (WAC)
Single Family 525/Lot
Multi -Family 420/Lot
Shut-off Charge 25.00
Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00
Late Fee 10% of Balance
W
0
1987
FEE TYPE
FEE
Sanitary Sewer
Single Family, townhouse
MN $17.85/Qtr. for 15,000
and Similar Residential
Gal. $1.10/1000 Gal. for
All Usage Over 15,000 Gal.
Based on Winter Quarter
Meter Reading
Apartment, Institutional
MN $17.85/Qtr. for 15,000
Commercial & Industrial
Gal. $1.10/1000 Gal. for
All Usage Over 15,000 Gal.
Sewer only (Sewer with no
Flat Rate - $24.15/Qtr.
water connection/meter to
measure flow
Water Works
All users
MN $17.00/Qtr for 15,000
Gal. & $.73/1000 Gal.for
All Usage'Over 15,000 Gal.
Street Light Energy
Single Family/Twin Homes
(R-1, R-2)
$2.50 Per Quarter Per Lot
Townhouses (R-3)
$2.00 Per Quarter Per Unit
®
'Multiple Residential &
$17.50 Per Quarter Per
Comm./Ind. (R74, C/I).
Billing Acct.
Road Unit Charge
$305.00
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)
Single Family (R1 and R2)
$625
Other
MWCC
Treatment Plant Charge 180.00
Water Supply & Storage (WAC)
Single Family 525/Lot
Multi -Family 420/Lot
Shut-off Charge 25.00
Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00
Late Fee 10% of Balance
W
0
UTILITY FEES CONT.
PAGE 2
FEE TYPE
After Hours Work
1987
FEE
A. Call Out - Labor Rate
2.5 Hr. Minimum +
10% Administrative
B. Extended Day
Labor + 10% Admin.
* Includes Copperhorn
Water Meter Removal
$ 30.00
Water Meter Replacement
$ 30.00
•
•
Water Meters
5/8" x 3/4" meter*-
67.00
3/4 water meter*
93.00
1" water meter
106.00
1 1/2" water meter
273.00
2" water meter
381.00
3" compound
1,160.00
4" compound
1,848.00
6" compound
3,570.00
3" turbo meter
620.00
4" turbo meter
1,045.00
6" turbo meter
1,838.00
#2 copperhorn w/swivel
16.00
Remote wire (over 35')
0.06/Ft
* Includes Copperhorn
•
n
PARRS AND RECREATION
FEE TYPE
Parkland Dedication
Single Family
Duplex
Townhouse/Quad
Apartments/Multiple
Commercial and Industrial
Park Fees
Picnic Kit
Rahn Building
Trapp Farm Pavillion
Enclosed Shelter Buildings
Open Shelters
Athletic Facilities/Shelters
Fields
Lights (If Required)
Building Cleaning
Damage Deposit
Community Rooms
Youth and Non -Profit
Others
Profit and Fund Raising
Chuckwagon Grill
Canopy
1987
FEE
$471.00
445.00
382.00
392.00
0.044/s.F.
3.00
50.00 Per Day
35.00 1/2 Day
5.00 Per Hour for Each
Hour over 5
$30.00 Minimum
15.00
30.00 Per Field Per Day
20.00 Per Field Per Day
30.00
-100.00
0.00
15.00
50.00
15.00
50.00/Day
S
11
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
A. PUBLIC
c ADDITIONAL,-ITEMS,I
CONTRACTS
CONTRACT 86-23, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1, HOLLAND LAKE —
TRUNK STORM SEWER
-l.. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #1, Holland Lake - Trunk
Storm Sewer --There are 3 parts to this Change Order described as
follows:
10 Part A: This provides for the substitution of a plastic
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe in lieu of the base bid ductal
iron pipe (DIP) for the force main portion of this trunk
storm sewer project. This substitution will result in a
DEDUCT of $27,075.
Part B: In order to minimize construction disturbance and
inconvenience to the residents and property of the Lakewood
Hills Addition, a section. of this storm sewer outlet is
proposed to be constructed by a tunneling method along a
common lot line in lieu of the open trench construction down
public street right-of-way. Although the tunneling
construction is more expensive, the shorter distance results
in a net DEDUCT of $9,225.215..
® Part C: After investigating alternative lift station
equipment and pumps, this Change Order provides for the
installation of a different manufacturer lift station at a
net DEDUCT of $45,000.84.
All alternates have been investigated and research thoroughly by
both the Public Works Director and the consultant engineer and it
is the combined recommendation that this Change Order be approved
for a combined deduct of $81,301.09.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #1 to
Contract 86-23 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) for a total
deduct of $81,301.09.
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
CONTRACT 85-21, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #3 (MAINTENANCE BLDG)
2. Contract 85-21, Approve Change Order #3 (Maintenance
Building) --This Change Order consists of 5 parts described as
follows:
Part A: With the approval of Change Order #1 expanding the
.; vehicle storage area an additional 25 feet the access drive
had to be extended an equal amount with concrete curb and
gutter and bituminous surfacing. (Add $1,643)
Part B: In anticipation of operational problems during heavy
snowfall periods, the original proposed chain link security
fence swinging gate into the vehicle maintenance yard was
revised to a cantilevered sliding design. (Add $995)
Part C: Concrete curb and gutter section was increased in
the vicinity of heavy vehicle equipment to provide increased
strength. (Add, $400)
Part D: The storm sewer line draining the parking lot on the
west side of the maintenance facility was realigned to avoid
a conflict with the proposed future salt storage shed
resulting in 'additional manholes and increased quanitities.
(Add $2,750)
Part E: During the installation of the storm sewer line on
the east side of the building, the alignment conflicted with
the newly installed sanitary sewer line constructed from the
Hampton Heights project resulting in the installation of an
additional manhole and bends to the storm sewer line. (Add
$1.,725)
The total amount of this Change Order (add $7,513) is within the
anticipated amount of $23,750 under the original budget for this
project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #3 to
Contract 85-21 (Maintenance Facility Remodeling/Expansion) and
authorize the Public Works Director to execute all related
documents.
M
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
B. Developers Task Force Recommended Policy for Temporary Signs --
At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the City staff was
directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of
temporary advertising signs at the intersection of city collector
and/or county roads. This policy was presented at the April
1, 1986,City Council meeting for review and consideration. At that
City Council meeting, official action was taken to "continue
consideration of the policy with the request that staff review
the proposal and prepare and submit guidelines regarding locations,
sizes, costs, color priorities and users to the City Council
® for later consideration." City staff did respond to this direction
by presenting information at the June 17, 1986 City Council meeting.
At that meeting a motion was adopted by the City Council, reading,
as follows: "the City Council generally favors the concept as
submitted by the staff, and requested the Developers Task Force,
together with the staff, review the request and submit recommenda-
tions including the following: 1) Sizes of signs, with suggested
12'' maximum height, 2) suggested locations, 3) the number of
ads on each of the signs, 4) material for the ads, including
removal of the signs and ads, 5) duration of the signs, 6) a proposal
that when a subdivision is 85% completed, the Council will not
renew the permit for the developer's sign, 7) prices and materials
should be reviewed and recommended to the Council, 8) safety
consideration shall be reviewed, and '9)sign placement, whether in
county or city rights-of-way or on private property shall be
studied. Further, it was understood that the existing temporary
sign permits be allowed through June 30, 1987, but that the City
• then require compliance with the new regulations, or until the
expiration of the temporary sign permit, whichever occurs last.
All Councilmembers voted affirmatively."
The Developers Task Force met and discussed the proposed regulatory
changes for temporary advertising signs at their September 24,
October 8 and most recently, November 12 meetings. There were
a number of concerns expressed at the November 12 meeting, about
the pros and cons of' using a reader board, as suggested in concept
by the City Council. Members of the committee expressed a concern
that a motorist would not have enough information from a reader
board and further that a reader board suggests continued directional
signage throughout the City in order to route a motorist to a
particular development. The Task Force was extremely sensitive
to the aesthetic concerns that originally suggested a reader
board as opposed to the hodge podge of temporary advertising
signs that currently exist at various intersections throughout
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 198'6, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
the City. After further 'consideration of the proposed reader
board, members of the Task Force felt that advertising/directional
signs are important for the benefit of the motorists at major
intersections throughout the City. The Task Force, after a lengthy
deliberation, is recommending to the City Council "a directional
advertising sign with a square footage not to exceed 20 square
feet and 4' X 5' in dimension, including any protrusion of the
sign. Furthermore, that the sign must be located on private
property, cannot obstruct any sight lines and there will be no
more than four signs per intersection with a restriction of two
per quadrant and further, that the sign not be allowed to exceed
® a seven foot elevation above grade." It was the feeling of the
Task Force that the City would 1) gain uniformity and control
over the number of temporary advertising signs, 2) provide a
benefit and service by providing both advertising and directional
needs to the motorist, and 3) the City would not be required
to negotiate land, construct the reader boards and sell advertising,
lessening the administrative responsibility to the City.
For additional information, copies of reports that were reviewed
earlier this year regarding the. concept of a reader board and'
the November 12 minutes of the Developers Task Force, are enclosed
on pages 62—'5� through 78 for your information.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To give consideration
to the recommendation to the Developers Task Force regarding
a regulatory change to the City Code or directional advertising
Is signs.
Agenda Information
�. June'17, 1986, City
Page Twenty -Five
Memo
Council Meeting
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN REGULATIONS
D. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign
Regulations --At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the
City staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for
the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections
of city collector and/or county roads. ' The policy was presented
at the April 1, 1986 City Council meeting for review and considera-
tion. For a copy of a memo of direction by the City Administrator
and a study completed by the Sign Inspector and Chief Building
Inspector, refer to pages /oy through /d Following review
and consideration of the temporary advertising signs policy,
Councilmember Ellison suggested "that one sign be permitted at
each intersection which would include several developers and
one standard with each developer potentially being able to place
a sign on more then one standard . After discussion, Smith moved,
Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the
policy with the request that staff review the proposal and prepare
and submit guidelines regarding locations, sizes, costs, color
priorities and users to the City Council for later consideration.
All voted yea." Following the motion, specific direction was
given to the City Administrator which is outlined in the attached
"Y memo enclosed on pages /OSS through 4_ to the Chief Building
Inspector. Mr. Borgschatz has responded to the April 4 memo,
and for a copy of his findings, refer to pages '/D through
F;r The cost projected for a steel sign seems high, however, individual
signs that are being purchased and placed by developers throughout
the community at various intersections are expensive and in some
cases might compete with the cost for one reader board. There
are many considerations, such as 1) The City monitoring .the
program as outlined by our Sign Inspector, 2) to adopt by ordinance
A temporary advertising sign and then submit a request for proposal
and allow various sign companies to bid on the reader board and
manage the same for the City of Eagan. In other words, a developer
would contact the sign company directly and buy time on the reader
board at the quote presented to the City. 3) Developers will
be restricted with the information that can be placed on a reader
board, eliminating use of their logo and other marketing informa-
tion. 4) Steel signs are certainly more expensive then
signs but require much less maintenance. The City could erect
the reader board signs during winter months, therefore providing
both the management and construction/installation service.
1
Reader boards at strategic locations throughout the City would
eliminate numerous temporary advertising signs that are being
placed by developers, and builders. Additional philosophy should
be considered regarding 1) the amount of regulatory control the
&5
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Six
TEMP ADVERTISING SIGNS CONT'D
City desires to place on builders and developers advertising
their business within the City. 2) I£ additional regulatory
control is desired, whether the City or private sector should
manage the installation of the signs. Because of the investment
certain developers and builders have made in temporary advertising
signs, any change in policy might require- either a sunset or
grandfather provision, to slowly eliminate those signs that are
currently in existence while freezing any replacement of new
temporary advertising signs.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To discuss and provide addi-
tional direction as to whether the City wishes to amend its Sign
Ordinance by regulating the use of reader boards for any and
all temporary advertising signs throughout the City.
a
MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986
SUBJECT: NEW POLICY FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION AND
LOCATION OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action thatwas taken by the Eagan City Council at
their regular meeting held on Tuesday, January 7, 1986, staff was
directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of
temporary advertising signs at the intersections of City collector
and/or County roads., The City Council commends your department on
the excellent work that Elmer Borgschatz and you have performed in
tightening up and carrying out regulatory provisions set for the
location of signs throughout the City. In a discussion at the
meeting, it is the desire of the City Council to develop additional
policy that will further tighten up. the location of temporary
advertising signs throughout the City. •
First, the City Council would like an inventory of signs that are
located on major City collector roads such as Blackhawk and all
County roads throughout the. City. This inventory or list of
existing. signs would include the duration (what amount of time is
remaining of the two-year, temporary status) and the quality of
the existing sign.
Secondly, the City Council is asking that the policy for consider-
ation include several of the 'following points: 1) temporary
advertising signs must be placed in a specific location not to
block any sight distance or view for the motorist; 2) consider-
ation should' be given to the adoption of criteria that would
establish a distance between temporary advertising signs (much the
same as general advertising) for aesthetic purposes; 3) a require-
ment would exist that. all adjacent property owners must be notified
and provide consent for. the placement of a temporary advertising
sign; 4) the size and type of structure for a temporary advertising
sign should again be reviewed; 5) consideration should be given to
criteria that would establish a maintenance provision allowing
City staff to require certain on-going maintenance of a temporary
advertising sign; and 6) other conditions that might be suitable
for a new temporary sign policy.
The City Council would like the inventory completed and a policy
to review by the first meeting in March. With the amount of
growth that is occurring, we anticipate the request for many more
temporary advertising signs; therefore, there is some urgency in
preparing a new policy for City Council consideration.
1 City Administrator
TLH/kf
(�7
Agenda Information Memo
April 1, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
REVIEW CURRENT POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
B. Review of Current Policy for Temporary Advertising Signs --The
City staff was directed, at a recent City Council meeting, to
inventory all temporary advertising signs on major collector roads
throughout the city. Further action taken at the January 7, 1986,
City Council meeting directed the City staff to prepare options for
revisions to the sign ordinance and sign policy concerning advertis-
ing directional signs. C.
Procedure requiring acceptable maintenance conditions has been
established by the Protective Inspections Department along with an
inventory that was completed and copied to each member of the City
Council during early March. There are many regulatory alternatives
to review, however, the three (3) options listed in the Chief
Building Official's Report were as follows:
Option 1. Leave the City Code 4.20 subdivision 1C9 and allow
the City Council to grant special permits using the
criteria of City 4.20 subdivisions 2 & 3 which
establish setbacks and standards.
Option 2: Limit temporary signs to a one-year maximum time
span, limited to Eagan developments only, area
limitation of 24 sq.feet, limit top edge of sign at
9 feet above street level: limit bottom edge of sign
to 6 feet above s`rea_ level, a limit •of two (2)
signs per intersection corner, and a minimum of 50
feet separation between signs.
Option 3: An immediate moratorium on all temporary advertising
signs and phase out existing signs as permits
expire.
Enclosed on page is a copy of the sign survey of 31 inter-
sections in Eagan. If any member of the City Council has misplaced
the specific sign locations, an additional copy can be made avail-
able. `
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or suggest a
regulatory change for the control and issuance of temporary adver-
tising signs. ,y
Total
SIG`I SURVEY OF
THIRTY ONE INTERSECTIONS IN EAGAN
Hwy 149 -& Lone Oak Rd
— No
sign
Hwy 149 -& Yankee Doodle
- 1
sign
(
3 sised, in sw corner
Dodd Rd -& Diffley
- 2
"
(
SW corner
HwF 3 -& Diffley
- 1
"
(
SW corner, Homeowners Produce for sale) no permit
Cliff Rd-& Hwy 3
- 1
!',
(
SW corner )
Cliff Pd & Dodd Rd
- 2
"
(
1 in NW, 1 in NE corner)
Cliff Rd & Lexington
- 2
"
(
NE.corner )
Cliff Rd & Pilot Knob
- 3
"
(
NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Thomas Lake
- 3
"
(
1 in, NE , 2 in NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Safari/ B H
- 2
"
(
1 in NE , 1 in S.E corner )
Cliff Rd & Johnny Cake
- 1
"
(
SE corner )
Cliff Rd & Galaxie
- 1
"
(
SE corner )
Cliff Rd & Rahn Rd
- 3
"
(
3 in NE corner )
Cliff Rd & Nicols
- 2
"
(
1 BP in ITE corner, 1 BP in SE Corner )
Cliff Rd & Slater
- 1
"
(
1 in SW corner Service station sign pending)
Cliff Rd & Cinamin Ridge
-
"
(
no sign )
Cedar Ridge &Shale
- 0
"
(
no sign )
Blackhawk & Hwy 30
- 3
"
(
3 in SW corner)
Diffley & Thomas Lake
- 2
to
(
1,in NW , 1 in NE corner )
Diffley & Pilot Knob
- 5
"
(
2 in NW, 3 in NE corner )
Deerrood & Pilot Knob
= 3
"
(
1 in NB corner , 3 2 in BE corner Should be remo�
Diffley & Lexington
- 7
"
(
1 in NE corner , 6 in SE corner )
Diffley & Trenton
- 4
".
(
1. in SE corner, on Right/a/way & 3 signs in SW co:
Wescott & Lexington
- 2
"
(
2 -in NW corner )
Yankee Doodle * Lex.
- 5
It
(
1 NW, 1 Sw, 3 SE & 1 in NE corner )
Yankee Doodle &Pilot Knob- 0 " ( 2 pylon signs , Hotel and Super America )
Yankee Doodle & Hwy 13 - 0 "
Four Oaks &'Hwy 13 - 1 " ( ! sign NE corner)
Lone Oak & Hwy 13 - 0 "
Lone Oak &Pilot Knob - 1 " ( Blackhawk Glen - No permit )
Lone Oak & Lexington - 3 " ( 2 in SE , 1 in NE corner )
Summary
1 intersection, 7 signs
2 " 5 "
1 It 4 "
6 It 3 u .
7 " 2 n
8
It 1 "
6 it o "
31 intersections 61 signs
MEMO TO: CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
Fes,; FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 4, 1986
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY -OWNED/
STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action that was taken by the City Council at their
April 1, 1986, meeting, a concept was given consideration whereby
the City would construct and install uniform, temporary advertising
signs throughout approved locations within the City. These signs
would be designed to accommodate several identification signs that
would meet a specific specification and design standard. Please
make reference to the example that was prepared by City Council -
member Ellison and is attached for your reference.
The City Council is concerned about the number of temporary C '
advertising signs that are located at busy intersections throughout
the community. I would like you to give consideration to this new •
concept that was proposed by the City Council and determine the
feasibility of the project. Please take into consideration the
following:
1.
Locations: It would be necessary to determine the loca-
tions that are suitable for installing a City -owned stan-
dardized sign.
2.
Size: Please prepare a set of specifications that would
standardize the sign and each reader board/identification
sign.
3.
Cost: Please .estimate the cost for construction and
installation of these signs. Also determine which each
of the individual reader board/identifications would cost
to construct and, further, what. -is fair in terms of
rental charges by the City.
4.
Priority: Please determine a method in which the reader
board/identification signs would be rented considering
•
priority of space on the City sign and, further, the
duration of time that those identification signs would be
allowed.
5.
Number of Signs: Please determine how many signs could
be placed on one of the overall signs and, further,
whether more than one size of sign should be given
consideration. Please see #2 above.
6.
Locations: Currently, a development is allowed two (2)
temporary advertising signs in addition to any signs that
are allowed on the subject development parcel. It would
be necessary to determine the procedure for allowing a
location and consideration for the two additional signs a
developer might request.
7.
Other Criteria: Please give consideration to any other
criteria that might be appropriate in considering this
project.
/70
It appears that the City Council would like to proceed with this
concept for controlling and providing a beautification to temporary
> advertising signs throughout the community. It would be necessary
=� to provide some type of transition such as, requiring developers
to remove their temporary advertising signs and possibly provide 'a
free or reduced rent for the first year to off -set expenses that
they have incurred in the construction of their temporary adver-
tising sign.
Again,please give this priority consideration. If you need
further assistance due to your departmental schedule, please con-
tact my office and I will provide some administrative assistance
either through our new intern or one of my Administrative Assis-
tants.
Gv
• City\v Administrator
cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers
TLH/kf
•
SA F/A ROAKS .
�I
H L L i O P F E R S
Hymn hom�s,�n C1omeS
r7�)-,
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM HEDGES
CHIEF BUILDING
OFFICIAL, DALE PETERSON
' FROM: ELMER A BORGSCHATZ
DATE: JUNE 12, 1986
BE: CITY COUNCILPROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY ONNED/STAND
TEMPORARYYADVERTISING SIGNS
ARDIZED
In reference to memo dated A
that may be helpful to stud Aril 4, 1986 we
a problem re have gathered some information
the co to a readerboard
which could be considered
impressed by the concept � board identification. been
eliminate
to when we refer to the ' however there may be some I have been very much
seven points set forth in Pitfalls as we will allude
C 1• LOCATIONS - Your letter.
The I would estimate that six reader boards are
present activity in the City. The developments areas of the Citneeded to cover
the use of ri htY' however it may be difficult 0-leare spread into
g of -ways would not be to lease six most
• advisable. Prime spots as
2. SIZE - The attached sign detail b
Eagan meets the recommendation Y a reputable
cost estimate of the advertising company in
also attached seems high Council, however the all -steel v �- steel sign
3. COSTS - In accordance with estimates
sign with steel we have for
include reflect Posts, removable (12" x 72„ adv- all steel constructed
The land ized panels would cost Panels) which
use cost is estimated at approximately would
annually may be low. $600 per unit. y maintenance
per unit.
$100 maintenance cost
Assuming a ten-year life expectancy of the all -
calculations indicate the projected income
service; steel sign, the following
necessary to provide the
To meet the annual costs
• 3 0 $1,143, depreciation f ich would be change of script;
Of site - $600 and $5�5� interest of $525, lease
$2,893• A monta $100 for maintenance for a total of
necessary, y rental fee of $33 per
panel would be
4.
5.
6.
PRIORITY _ It
is suggested that the reader board
applicants who have shown the greatest
Processed in the preceding be leased to the
g six mo
nths. activity in number of
NUMBER units
OF SIGNS - We believe that signs should be
values. At the moment
Signs in strategic' it would seem difficult to uniform for aesthetic
allow an six
for 4g locations within the Cit locate more
users and not the
y• Six signs filled hwould
outlay of approximately $36,000 looks the gacceptance b y, the
large. Y the industry,
LOCATION our contention that
� - It is
spots. I believe Council and mama location could
temporary advertisin gement could be be found for six good
Part of the Problem.g'needs, hopef� the reader abetter judge of the
.,;� board would eliminate
7. OTHER CRITERIA - Space on the reader board on an annual basis, if renewals
are wanted, arrangements and fees should be made 30 days before
expiration. Vacancies_ do not destroy the effect of the board.
EB/js
_•
Q?O
June 6, 1986
Mr. Elmer Borgschatz
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Twin post directional signs
Dear Elmer:
To furnish and install a 16' tall twin post structure with
eight double faced directional panels as shown on Drawing
fight -193, our price to you is $4,737.00• For optional
reflective copy, add $512.00.
The following is a cost breakdown for your review:
Installed Total
Furnished �—
700.00
1300.00 2000.00
Poles
Reflective 281,00
90.00 381.00
12" x 72" D/F panels
Non -x 72it DIFevF Panels 227.00
90.00 317.00
12" x 7 "
Sincerely,
LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC.
Mike Gifford
MG:ds
N O,.N IO AN iOl" DI JO
_ m3�n enuadsa3d
3� •YC ]UwM
Be,l OS OMV SNAn .11ry
bo
13my'1YniY - - �%+a0
.Q31M01'Jl1f 111
1
ooh 7;
0
goOda oa
L1l�J�l�1V� UU�U� �l
cl Ro V
�V II McMDCSaa4LTC C�
maln eat
I
07
c
.uYi
{
�fr
o
r
r j ldlU
N O,.N IO AN iOl" DI JO
_ m3�n enuadsa3d
3� •YC ]UwM
Be,l OS OMV SNAn .11ry
bo
13my'1YniY - - �%+a0
.Q31M01'Jl1f 111
1
ooh 7;
0
goOda oa
L1l�J�l�1V� UU�U� �l
cl Ro V
�V II McMDCSaa4LTC C�
maln eat
I
M12MES OF THE DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE MEETING
Eagan,, Minnesota
November 12, 1986
A meeting of the Developers Task Force was convened by City
Administrator Hedges at 4:10 p.m. on November 12, 1986, in the conference
rooms of the Municipal Center, Building. Present were Mark Johnson, Mark
Johnson Construction; Pat Hoffman, Advance Developers; Lori Trygg, Advisory
Planning Commission representative; Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation; Dale
Peterson, Chief Building Inspector; Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works;
Dale Runkle, City Planner; Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant and Tom
Hedges, City Administrator.
An amendment to the minutes of the September 24, 1.986, Developers
Task Force meeting was reviewed and found acceptable as recommended.Minutes
of the October 8, 1986, Developers Task Force meeting were also reviewed. In
• a motion by Trygg, seconded by Hoffman, all members voting in favor, the
minutes were approved as presented..
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
Dale Peterson, Chief Building Inspector, responded to direction that
was given at the October 8, Developers Task Force meeting, suggesting that
major intersections that could include some type of directional sign are
Diffley and Pilot Knob Road, Diffley and Lexington, Yankee Doodle and
Lexington, Lone Oak and Lexington, Cliff and Dodd Road and Cliff and Pilot
Knob Road. He also stated that the signs would be all wood, 12 feet in
height, 7 feet wide and consisting of eight (8) double faced panels that are
approximately six feet long. Chief Building Inspector Peterson stated that
the initial cost would be $1,500 installed by a City crew. He further
indicated that the annual cost analysis would be approximately $980 for each
reader board considering the average land lease for the sign of $600, annual
depreciation of $300 and an annual maintenance totaling $80. According to
• Chief Building Inspector Peterson, the panels could lease for approximately
$120 per year to cover all expenses.
Pat Hoffman expressed his objection to the proposed reader board/
directional signs stating that developers could no longer advertise housing
projects, which is essential to persons who are looking for. housing
developments while driving through Eagan. He stated that the use of panels
are too restrictive and only act as directional and not advertising signs.
Mark Johnson stated that the newspapers provide more information and possibly
the reader board is better suited as a directional sign. Pat Hoffman
suggested that the sign ordinance be tightened up as necessary to provide
better controls at major intersections and possibly limit the number of
temporary advertising signs, as opposed to the City being in the business of
leasing signs that would only satisfy directional purposes.
After further discussion regarding the proposed panels, it was
determined by the Developers Task Force that the amount of space would only
provide a name recognition and direction and it was further pointed out that
if directional signs are to be used at major intersections it is then
necessary to continue the signage so the motorists can find the development
project. The Developers Task Force also concluded that the type of
information that is contained on each sign is important and should provide
some minimum data about the housing project and that the sign should be
7'7
limited in size.
The Developers Task Force continued their discussion, suggesting
that temporary advertising signs are necessary due to the growth orientation
of the community. Rod Hardy suggested that a minimum square footage and
number of signs be allowed for each intersection. This should minimize the
negative aesthetic impact at certain locations within the community. It was
suggested by Task Force members that minimum sign size be 4' x 4' and the
number of signs be limited to four per intersection, with no more than two per
quadrant. It was also suggested that a sign depth or width be limited to one
foot so that a temporary advertising sign could not include four sides. One
additional criteria discussed was that all temporary advertising signs be
placed on private property and cannot obstruct any sight lines for the
motorist.
After further discussion as to the number of signs per quadrant and
their sizes, a motion was introduced by Rod Hardy, seconded by Mark Johnson,
with all members voting in favor, to recommend to the City Council a
directional advertising sign with a square footage not to exceed 20 square
feet and 4' x 5' in dimension, including any protrusion of the sign.
Furthermore, that the sign must be located on private property, cannot
obstruct any sight lines and there will be no more than four signs per
intersection with a restriction of two per quadrant and further, that the sign
not be allowed to exceed a seven foot elevation above grade.
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY REQOIREMENTS
Director of Public Works Colbert presented a street matrix that
identifies minimum street requirements for the City of Eagan. He stated that
the matrix identifies all road types including local access, collectors and
arterials and describes specifications including width, traffic lanes, parking
lanes, grade design, street minimum curb centerline radius, design load,
walkways, centerline entrance spacing and a column for average daily trips.
Following the Director of Public Works' presentation, there was a discussion
regarding the reduction of the average daily trips from 500 to 200 for a low
density project that might justify a reduction in the street width from 28
feet to 24 feet in width. There was also a discussion regarding the
requirements and regulations for private street construction and it was
determined by the Developers Task Force that these regulations may be
different from a public street. Director of Public Works Colbert stated that
his proposed requirements are in draft form and would like to continue
evaluation of the matrix and present the same for consideration at the next
meeting.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting was set for December 11, 1986,'at'4:00 p.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:,50 p.m.
TLH
Dated
Chairperson
Secretary
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 19'86, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
C. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
CONTRACT 83-K, FINAL ACCEPTANCE (BRITTANY 6TH ADDITION)
1. Contract 83-D, Final Acceptance (Brittany 6th Addition -
Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request from the
developer along with the recommendation from a consultant
engineer that all streets and utilities installed privately by
the develoepr within the Brittany 6th Addition under Contract 83-
K conformed to City approved Plans and Specifications and are in
order for formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance by the
City. All final inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department with a
recommendation for favorable Council action to this request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 83-K
(Brittany 6th Addition - Streets and Utilities) for final
acceptance and perpetual maintenance,.
CONTRACT 84-T,, FINAL ACCEPTANCE (BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION)
2. Contract 84-T, Final Acceptance (Brittany 7th Addition -
Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request for final
acceptance from the developer along with a certification from our
® consultant engineer that all public improvements installed
privately by the developer conform with the City approved Plans
and Specifications. All final inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department and it is being
forwarded :to the Council the recommendation for favorable
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve, Contract 84-T,
(Brittany 7th Addition - Streets and Utilities) for final
acceptance and perpetual maintenance.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Enclosed on page 00.2. is a copy of the September monthly report
for the Eagan Volunteer Fire Department.
HRA UPDATE
Enclosed on pages 90 through is a copy of a status report
for Dakota County regarding assisted housing and community develop-
ment.
FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
The City has received notification from the. Government Finance
Officers Association that our Director of Finance has again received
the award of Financial Reporting Achievement which is the highest
recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting.
The City Administrator will issue a press release to our local
newspapers regarding this achievement.
UPDATE ON I -35E DIFFLEY CENTER PROPOSAL
The Advisory Planning Commission held a three (3) hour hearing
last evening in consideration of the I -35E Diffley Center, proposed
rezoning and preliminary plat. After approximately one hour
• and twenty minutes of presentation by the developers and an hour
and a half of comments by residents and discussion by the Advisory
Planning Commission, the proposed applications were continued
for sixty (60) days. This item will again be discussed by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their January 27, 1987 meeting.
There were five (5) areas of study that the Advisory Planning
Commission directed the City staff to research. Those items
are as follows: 1) a thorough police and fire review, similar
to the race track, 2) a detailed traffic analysis and review
of infrastructure by the Director of Public Works and an indepen-
dent traffic engineer, selected by the City, 3) data that states
the national average for commercial square footage per person
in communities of Eagan's population, 4) what is the proposed
tax impact on the community and 5) study alternate zoning
tradeoffs throughout the community. This report will be prepared.
and distributed as a part of the APC packet information for the
January meeting.
go
MLC UPDATE'
Enclosed without page number is a copy of the MLC Update for
November/December.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
V
•
•
EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF September, 1986
WORK PERFORMED
TYPE MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue .542
Training 644'
Truck & Equipment Maintenance 141
Station Maintenance 141
Fire Prevention 50
Administrative 306
TOTAL 1,824
MANPOWER
STATION #]
STATION #2..
STATION #
.Available
Nights
9
12
9
Available
Days .
6
5
3
Available
Days and Nights
3
4
3
Available
Rotating
3
1
2
On Leave
0
1
0
Rookies
0
0
. 0 %' '
TOTAL
21
23
17
FIRE/RESCUE
TYPE
NUMBER
$ LOSS
Structure
13
22,680
Grass
0
0
Vehicle
6
10250
False
16
Medical
6
Other
3
TOTAL
44
$ 23,930
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE
NAME LOCATION
OCCUPANCY
$ LOSS
9/10/86
4615 Nicols
Road
House
2,000
9/21/86
1682 Walnut
Lane
House
20,000
R. DAKOTA
1
ON
Yeti
ria 10�
� iala:nia
COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496- 145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
Serving People and Communities
MEMORANDUM
TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred
Joy, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department
FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director
SUBJECT: NEW STATUS REPORT FORMAT
DATE: November 13, 1986
We have revised our Monthly Status Report format. Each city will now receive a
report for their community and a county -wide report. If you would like to also
receive reports on other Dakota County communities, please call Lori Zierden of
our staff.
We hope this new format is easier to follow and provides you with the infor-
mation you need to assess assisted housing and community development activity in
your area.
�- S3
"CAI Fnllhl noon9TII11IT1 C110InVCG"
ASSISTED HOUSING
Status Report for Dakota County**
October, 1986
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total +/-
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
**Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing,
Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the
Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community
Development programs.
Section 8 Existing - Certificates
440
1,055
1,495
0
Section 8 Existing - Vouchers
0
1
1
+1
Moderate Rehab
4
21
25
0
Section 8 New Construction
247
300
547
0
Low Rent Housing
380
182
562
0
235 Home
0
41
41
0
236 Rental
0
526
526
0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING
071
2,126
3,197
—+I
Amount
t
of
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Elderly
Family
Commercial
Total
Increase
MHFA Home Improvement Loan
31
131
0
162
1
MHFA Home Rehab Loan
63
77
0
140
5
'
MHFA Home Energy Loan
10
77
0
87
0
Rental Rehab
38
47
0
85
42
CDBG Rehab Loan
87
127
0
214
0
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home
1
15
0
16
14
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan
0
8
0
8
0
312 Loan Residential
4
15
0
19
1
312 Loan Commercial & Mixed Use
N/A
N/A
3
3
1
Weatherization
309
1,160
0
1,469
18
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
543
X57
3T,-2-0-3
82
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
**Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing,
Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the
Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community
Development programs.
.1.
Status Report for the City of Eagan
October, 1986
ASSISTED HOUSING
Elderly
Family
Total
Section 8 Existing - Certificates
30
161
191
Section 8 New Construction
0
33
33
Low Rent Housing
0
17
17
236 Rental
0
144
144
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING
30
355
385
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MHFA Home Improvement Loan
MHFA Home Rehab Loan
MHFA Home Energy Loan
CDBG Rehab Loan
Weatherization
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
* + = Increase/- = Decrease.
Elderly
0
3
1
5
-0
gS
Family
7
3
7
3
57
777
Total
7
6
8
4
62
Lh
Amount
of
LLI!
0
0
0
0
0
Amount
of
Increase
0
0
0-
1
T
W
;1
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DECEMBER 2, 1986
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY ATTORNEY
There are no items to consider.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
There are no items to consider
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Project 481, Blueberry Circle
Schedule
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
i
(Storm 'Sewer Construction
1. Project 481, Blueberry Circle (Storm Sewer Construction
Schedule) --At the November 18 meeting, the Council deleted Project
481 from Contract 86-27 which provided for the installation of the
storm sewer in Blueberry Circle due to the fact that the low bidder
for the overall contract which included another project did not
provide the best price for Blueberry Circle. At that time, the low
contractor for Blueberry Circle indicated he would be willing to
guarantee his price for construction if he could start
"immediately".
Due to the delay in receiving the executed agreements from the three
property owners regarding the revised amounts, the contractor no
longer is willing to perform the work yet this year for his quote of
$12,333. The next lowest contractor is $13,774 or an increase of
approximately $1400 who would perform the work yet this year.
If the work is delayed until next spring, the original low
contractor would still honor his prices plus provide a $400 credit
due to the elimination of a cold patch on Blueberry Lane.
The staff would like to receive direction from the Council whether
to delay, this construction until the spring of 87 or to proceed with
the second low bid at an additional cost of $1400.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Provide appropriate direction
to staff regarding the scheduling of Project 481 (Blueberry Circle -
Storm Sewer).
ITIONAL INFORMATION
It was brought to my attention that Page 4, the list of contractor
licenses, was missing from some of the packets. Enclosed and
referenced as page 4 is a copy of that list.
/s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES
DECEMBER 2, 1986
GENERAL CONTRACTORS
1 . Domain Constructors, Inc.
2. Jeff Scherer Construction
HEATING h VENTILATING
1. Blaine Heating, Air. Conditioning & Electric, Inc.
2. Master Mechanical, Inc.
MASONRY, CEMENT WORK
1. Dan Dietrich Construction, Inc.
PLUMBING
1. Hopkins Plumbing & Heating
a
AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
CITY BALL
DECEMBER 2, 1986
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - BOLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES
III., 6:40 - DEPARTMENT READ BUSINESS
A. Fire Department
B. Parks and Recreation Department
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA
F>.3 A. Contractors Licenses
?,S B. Personnel Items
V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
T. & A. Public Hearing to Vacate Portion of Coachman Road Extension
Hampton Heights (Continued from November 18, 1986, Meeting)
B. Public Hearing for Project 482, Nancy Circle - Streets
C. Public Hearing for Project, 483, SuperAmerica/Splashland - Trunk
Water Main
VI. OLD BUSINESS'.
F. -Z9 A. Conditional Use Permit (ABF Freight System) for a Pylon Sign for a
Trucking Company on Lots 3-6, Plainview Addition Located South of
Hwy #55, Abutting Lexington Avenue on the West, W 1/2 of Sec 2
24 B. Kennel License Renewals
VII. NEW BUSINESS
? A( A. Resolution Establishing Fees for Various City Services for 1987
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS
P(,i A. Public Improvement Contract
1. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #1, Holland Lake - Trunk
Storm Sewer
f -G.2,2. Contract 85-21, Approve Change Order #3 (Maintenance Building)
B. Developers Task Force Recommended Policy for Temporary Advertising
Signs
C. Private Improvement Contract
�•'1 `j 1. Contract 83-K, Final Acceptance (Brittany 6th)
�>.rlol 2. Contract 84-T,. Final Acceptance (Brittany 7th)
IB. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda)
X. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUMCILMEMBERS
FROM:. CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1986
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION
After approval is given to the December 2, 1986 agenda and
regular City Council meeting minutes for the November 18 and
special minutes for the November 13 meetings, the following items.
are in order for consideration:
J,DEP.ARTMENT`.HEADS�BUSINESS;;
A. FIRE DEPARTMENT
Ken Southern was recently elected as Fire Chief to a three (3)
year term which officially begins December 1, 1986. Also David
DiIoia was elected District 1 Chief to fill Ken Southern's
vacancy which is two years on a three year term. Fire Chief
Southern and District 1 Chief DiIoia will be officially sworn in
Tuesday evening. There is no official action required on this
item.
B. PARKS S RECREATION DEPARTMENT:
Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --The Parks and
Recreation Commission is ,recommending to the City Council an
authorization for the Eagan Snowmobile Club to use a portion of
the Highline trail corridor and the boulevards on Johnny Cake
Ridge Road south of Cliff for snowmobile trail access This
trail access allows snowmobilers to use the Dakota
County/Lebanon Hills Regional Park which includes a designation
for snowmobile trails. For a review of the Parks and Recreation
Commission's action on this item, refer to a memo prepared by the
Director of Parks and'Recreation found on page -1--.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/disapprove
Eagan Snowmobile Club request for the use of the Highline trail
and Johnny Cake Ridge Road for snowmobile trail access.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: REN VRAA
DIRECTOR OF PARRS AND
DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1986
SUBJECT: SNOWMOBILE TRAIL USE REQUEST
Background - the last 4 or 5 winter seasons, the Eagan Snowmobile
Club has annually requested the use for a.portion of the Highline
trail corridor and the boulevards on JohnnyCake Ridge Road south
of Cliff for snowmobile trail access. This trail access Dakota
County/Lebanon Hills Regional Park for snowmobile use.
• Ad,visory._PaEji and Recreation Commission's Review - At the
November 6 Advisory Commission meeting, the Commission received
a request from the Eagan Snowmobile Club and Mr. Maynard Ohm
asking the Commission and City to again designate these trails as
access to Dakota County Park. All conditions previously
developed, including annual review of said trails, were agreed
to. The Advisory Commission noted some problems with
snowmobiles, determined that said problems were not necessarily a
direct result of the use of the Highline Trail and JohnnyCake
Ridge Boulevard. Therefore, Advisory Commission, with one member
voting no, is recommending to the City Council that the Eagan
Snowmobile Club again be granted permission to utilize JohnnyCake
Ridge Road/Highline Trail as previously designated for access
trail to Dakota County Regional Park.
® For Council Action - To approve/disapprove Eagan Snowmobile Club
request for the use of the Highline Trail and JohnnyCake Ridge
Road for snowmobile trail access.
DirecCdr.-o-f Parks and Recreation
KV/cks
v
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Two
There are two (2) items on the agenda referred to as
consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If
the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further
detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and
placed under additional items unless the discussion required is
• brief.
CONTRACTOR LICENSES
•
A. Contractor Licenses --Attached on page is a list of
contractors who are renewing or who hav-e een selected and
retained as the builder by a customer either living in or
planning to reside within the City of Eagan. These contractors
have references from other municipalities or their client permit
applications are awaiting City Council approval for a contractor
license.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS, ITEM: To approve the contractor
licenses as presented,.
3
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council.Meeting
Page Three
PERSONNEL ITEMS
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS:
Item 1, Clerk=Typist/Admi•nistration--The City has received a
letter of resignation from Corrine Smith, a clerk -typist in the
typing pool in Administration, effective December 3, 1986, as
she has accepted another position with a small law firm.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the letter of
resignation of Corrine Smith and to authorize advertisement for a
• part-time clerk -typist for the typing pool in Administration. .
Item 2, Planning Ai -de --The City has received a letter of
resignation from Julie Dykstra, the planning aide in the Planning
Department, effective January 2, 1987. She has accepted a
position with a development company.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEMr To accept the resignation
of Julie Dykstra and to authorize advertisement to fill the
vacant planning aide position.
Item 3, Clerk-Typist/Protective Inspections Department --
Approximately 20 applications were received for the vacant clerk -
typist position in the Protective Inspections Department. After
screening, 11 applicants were tested and interviewed by Chief
Building Official Peterson, Inspections and Parks secretary
•
Severson and Administrative Assistant Duffy. It is their
recommendation that Nancy Severson (no relation) be hired to fill
this vacant position. Ms. Severson has successfully passed the
City's physical examination requirement.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of
Nancy Severson as a clerk -typist in the Protective Inspections
Depa-rtment. The appointment would be effective as of November
25, 1987.
r
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Four
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VACATE PORTION OF COACHMAN ROAD EXTENSION - HAMPTON HEIGHTS
A. Public Hearing to Vacate Portion of Coachman Road Extension -
Hampton Heights --We have received a petition from the developer
of the Hampton Heights Addition to vacate that portion of
Coachman Road that has been abandoned through its realignment as
a part of the Hampton Heights subdivision. Enclosed on page
is a map showing the location of that portion of Coachman 40
Road to be vacated. It should be noted that only the road right-
of-way is being vacated and the City is retaining drainage and
utility easement sufficient to cover its existing utilities. All
notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all potentially affected utility companies. As of this date,
staff has not received any objections to this proposed vacation.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Coachman Road
Extension through the Hampton Heights and authorize the Mayor. and
City Clerk to execute all related documents..
I
V1 I
i3rld 63-TUY 3
•-1r
I
PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION
.1.11 Ell
That part of recorded easement Document No. 6214640 described
as follows:
A perpetual easement for roadway purposes over, under and
across the east 30.00 feet of the west 530.00 feet of the
north 1742.4 feet of said east half of the northwest quarter
(E 3� of NA) .
"Gay ISHI'd SIHS13H
Ail/6I S
7
I 'N'
sit
2
V1 I
i3rld 63-TUY 3
•-1r
I
PROPOSED ROADWAY EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION
.1.11 Ell
That part of recorded easement Document No. 6214640 described
as follows:
A perpetual easement for roadway purposes over, under and
across the east 30.00 feet of the west 530.00 feet of the
north 1742.4 feet of said east half of the northwest quarter
(E 3� of NA) .
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Five
PROJECT 482. NANCY CIRCLE - STREETS
B. Project 482, Nancy Circle - Streets --In response to a
petition received by the residents on Nancy Circle to upgrade
this gravel road cul-de-sac to City standards with bituminous
surfacing and.concrete curb and gutter, the Council authorized
the preparation of the Feasibility Report which was presented at
• the November 6 meeting with the public hearing being scheduled
for December 2. Enclosed on pages through-
/� is a copy
of the Feasibility Report for the Council^s infir-mation and
reference during this public hearing.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent
to all property owners proposed to be assesseed under this
project.
Our consultant engineer will discuss the details of this project
and be available to answer any''questions that may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny Project 4'82 (Nancy Circle - Streets).
•
•
REPORT
FOR
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1986
FILE No. 49402
BO'NESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc.
2335 W. Trunk Highway 36
St. Paul, MN 55113
612-636.4600
October 22, 1986
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Nancy Circle
Street Improvements
Project No. 482
Our File No. 49402
Dear Mayor and Council:
Engineers & Architects
Ono G. Bonnnuu, P.E.
Nubrn W. N., P.E.
Jwryh C. Andrrlik. P.E.
Bla fJ d A. Lemhrrh, P.E.
Richard E. Tumrr, P.E.
Juma C. Ohun, P.E.
Glrnn R. Cook. P.E.
Krish A. Gwdun, P.C.
Th. E. N.,, P.E.
NhNurd W. Fwlrr, P.E.
Noon G. SchuNrhl. P.E.
M..,in L. Surmlu, P.E.
Uuno/d C. B....N'. P.£.
J,,ry A. Bourdun. P.E.
Murk A. Nawun, P.E.
Trd K. FWd. P.E.
Mn'hod T. Noulmunn, E£
Nub" N. P/�1Jr"r. VE.
m o. Lwkmu. P.E.
Th.. W. P"rrsun, P.E.
MirhW C. Lynch, P.E.
K,. L. Willa. P.E.
Jomn R. Muland. P.E.
Krnnrlh P. Andrrsun, P.E.
A'rilh A. &,h nn, P.E.
Murk R, MI.. P. E.
Rub"C. Nuark, A.I.A.
Thw w E. Anhw, Y.S.
&uu L. Tuunk, P.E.
Churl. A. EmL..
Lm M. Powhky
Harlon M. oh.
Sawn M. EMdm
Enclosed is our report for Nancy Circle, Project No. 482. This report covers
street improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll.
We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report.
Yours very truly,
EON4STROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK ti ASSOCIATES, INC.
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
7 Date: October 22, 1986
Approved by: 1 ,
epartment of Public Works
Date: // ,7-
0117e
/0
30 Year
Annivers^ry
Reg. No. 14260
•
•
Mark A. Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Mark A. Hanson
7 Date: October 22, 1986
Approved by: 1 ,
epartment of Public Works
Date: // ,7-
0117e
/0
30 Year
Annivers^ry
Reg. No. 14260
•
•
SCOPE: This project provides for street improvement of Nancy Circle east of
Nichols Road within Tousignant's First Addition. The proposed improvement
would include upgrading Nancy Circle to City of Eagan residential street stan-
dards with concrete curb and gutter and bituminous paving. Nancy Circle is
abutted by six single family, platted parcels.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Street Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION: Nancy Circle is an existing 26' wide gravel street ending in an
® approximate 35' radius cul-de-sac. Water main and sanitary sewer for Nancy
Circle were installed under the 1971 City Improvement Project No. 64.. In 1979
storm sewer was installed east of Tousignant's First Addition with a catch
basin manhole located as indicated on Figure 1.
For this project, it is porposed to upgrade Nancy Circle to a 28' wide bi-
tuminous street and 40' radius •bituminous cul-de-sac with concrete curb and
gutter. In addition, it is proposed to construct a catch basin and storm
sewer line from the east end of the cul-de-sac to the existing catch basin
manhole.
® It is assumed, for purposes of this report, that the existing aggregate
base is not of sufficient depth and cross-section to be fully utilized in the
upgrading of the street. Minor excavation of the street will be required to
bring it to proper elevation and cross section. Therefore, we have estimated
installation of an additional 4+ inches of aggregate base along with a minor
amount of common excavation required for curb installation. However, as part
of the preparation of the plans and specifications, a more detailed analysis
will be accomplished to better evaluate the depth and cross section of the ex-
isting aggregate base to determine the amount of additiona base required.
Page 1.
0117e
EASEMENTS: A 10' storm sewer easement along with a temporary construction
easement will be required over either lot 3 or 4 depending on where the storm
sewer is located.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
Assessment and Construction Area
Lots 1-6, Block 1, Tousignant's First Addition
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $32,770 which
includes contingencies and all related overhead but no easement acquisition
is
costs. Overhead costs are estimated at 30% and include legal, engineering,
administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
properties. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B located
at the back of this report. All 'costs will be revised based on final costs.
The assessments will be .spread over a period of 15 years. The interest rate
will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment
hearing. It is proposed to assess the project costs equally on a per lot
basis to all lots within Tousignant's First Addition. •
REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are esti—
mated to be as follows:
Street Assessment
TOTAL ................
Project Cost
Revenue
$32,770
$32,770
$33,770
$32,770
Balance
All costs for this project are proposed to be assessed; therefore, there
are no funds required from the major street fund.
Page 2.
0117e
�v
•
•
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Construction Completion
Final Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estates Taxes
0117e
Page 3.
/3
November 6, 1986
December 2, 1986
Winter, 1987
Spring, 1987
Summer, 1987
September, 1987
May, 1988
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 482
LUMP
SUM
Clear 6 Grub @ L.S.
$ 200
150
Cu.yds.
Common Excavation @ $5.00/cu.yd.
750
50
Cu.yds.
Subgrade correction @ $5.00/cu.yds.
250
1
Each
Catch basin @ $900.00/each
900
80
Lin.ft.
12" RCP Storm Sewer @ $35.00/lin.ft.
2,800
1
Each
Cut—in to existing CBMH @ $300.00/each
300
300
Ton
Class 5 Aggregate Base (streets) @ $7.00/ton
2,100
50
Ton
Class 5 Aggregate Base (driveways) @ $10.00/ton
500
90
Ton
2331 Bituminous Base Course @.$13.50/ton
1,215
90
Ton
2341 Bituminous Wear Course @ $14.50/ton
1,305
11
Ton
Bituminous Materia_1 for Mixture @ $180.00/ton
1,980
50
Gals.
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat @ $1.50/gal.
75
550
Lin.ft.
B618 Concrete Curb 6 Gutter @ $6.00/lin.ft.
3,300
130
Sq.yds.
6" Concrete Driveway @ $30.00/sq.yd.
3,900
130
Sq.yds.
2" Bituminous Driveway @ $12.00/sq.yd,
1,560
1
Each
Adjust'G.V. Box @ $75.00/each
75
1,400
Sq.yds.
Sod w/topsoil @ $2.00/sq.yd.
2,800
TOTAL
$24,010
+5% Contingencies
1,200
$25,210
+30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest
7,560
TOTAL.............................................
$32,770
Page 4
0117e
i
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 482
Parcel Description No. Lots
Tousignant's First Addition
Lots 1-6, Block 1 6
0117e
Page 5.
/J-7/
Total
Rate/Lot Assessments
$5,462 $32,770
w
Z)
z
w
Q
N
J
O
U
r4
2 3
PROP SED STOR SEWER
NANCY CI R LE
I
A
j -EXISTING
42' STORM
I SEWER
A
I
PROPOSE10 STREET IM ROVEMENT
B618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
30' BACK" 0 BACK .
6 5 4
TOUSIGNANT'S Ist. ADD.
NANCY CIRCLE
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT No. 482
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK
do ASSOCIATES, INC.
Engineers do Architects
St. Paul, Minnesota
Date: Oct. 86
Comm. 49402 11 Fig. No. 1
Agenda Information Memo,,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Six
PROJECT 483 . SQPERAMERICA/SPLASHLAND - TRUNK WATER MAIN
C. Project 483, S uperAmer ica/Spl ash land - Trunk Water Main --With
the proposed development of the Splashland Addition, the
developer was going to install the required 12 inch water main
from Cedar Avenue through this development to his connection at
Trunk Highway 13. Because this would have involved an inner
connection between two major pressure zones in the City, the
• developer petitioned for the installation of the appropriate
pressure reducing station.
Subsequently, the developer has withdrawn from his proposed
development and will no longer be installing the required 12 inch
trunk water main. Therefore, the petition was expanded to
incorporate this 12 inch water main in addition to the pressure
reducing station to service not only the future development of
the Splashland property, but adjacent properties'as well.
Enclosed on pages �through is a copy of the
Feasibility Report for the Council's -information and reference
during this public hearing. All notices have been published in
the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to
be assessed under this project.
Representatives of our consultant engineering firm will be
•
available to discuss this project and answer any questions that
may arise.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public
hearing and approve/deny Project 483 (Super-America/Splashland -
Trunk Water Main).
17.
FOR
SUPERAMERICA
• (SPLASIILAND WATER PARK
TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENTS
•
PROJECT.No.483
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1986
FILE NO. 49403
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 81 ASSOCIATES, INC.
ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of trunk water main improve-
ments along Sibley Terminal Drive in the vicinity of Superamerica. The project
area is north of Diffley Road between Old Highway 13 and Cedar Avenue Freeway.
The area is zoned agriculture and general business.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the toaster Utility Plan for the City of
Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract.
DISCUSSION: This project provides for the construction of a 12 inch trunk
water main and a pressure reducing station. The 12 inch trunk water main will
connect an existing trunk stub along the west side of the Cedar Avenue Freeway
•
north of Diffley Road to the existing trunk main at the intersection of Sibley
Terminal Drive and Old Highway 13. The main will be located along the south
side of Sibley Terminal Drive. In addition, a water service will be installed
to Parcel 010-52 (Buckeye Gas Products Company).
The pressure reducing station will be located within the boulevard area of
Old Highway 13. The station will be required to control the pressure within
the area after the looping of the existing 12 inch trunk main is completed.
The water pressure will be controlled between the high pressure zone and the
intermediate
•
pressure zone at an elevation of 950.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED: The construction and assessment areas will be:
Construction Area
SW 1/4 Section 19
Parcel 015-50
Parcel 010-52
Parcel 011-54
Parcel 011-57
Group W Addition
011le
Assessment Area
SW 1/4 Section 19
Parcel 015-50
Parcel 011-51
Parcel 011-54
Parcel 011-57
Parcel 010-52
Parcel 013-56
Group W Addition
S S W Industrial Acres, Block 1
Lot 1
Lot 2
Outlot A
EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary construction easements will be required
over Parce1.015-50 for cosntruction of the main from the existing stub along
the west side of the freeway to Sibley Terminal Drive. Easements will be
obtained as part of the platting of. Parcel 015-50 with no additional.
anticipated coat to the project.
PERMITS: Construction permits from Mn/DOT will be required for construction
along the freeway and within Old Trunk Highway 13 right-of-way.
COST ESTIMATE: A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at
the back of this report. A summary of these costs is as follows:
Pressure Reducing Station $21,840
• Trunk Water Main 74,260
Water Service 1,210
TOTAL $97,310
The total estimated project cost is $97,310 which includes contingencies
and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated at 30 percent and
include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest.
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against benefited
properties and a preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. The
® assessments are' proposed to be spread over a period of 15 years. The interest
rate will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of final assessment
hearing.
WATER MAIN: It is proposed to assess properties that abut Sibley Terminal
Drive a lateral benefit from trunk where no Lateral benfit has been previously
assessed. Where it has been previously assessed, 150' corner lot credits would
be applied. Trunk area water assessments are proposed to be assessed against
011le
those areas not previously assessed under other projects. These areas are
indicated on the attached drawings. The water service is proposed to be
assessed to the property that is served with the final assessment based on
actual construction costs.
Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report are as
follows:
Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main
Commerical and Industrial $39.14/F.F.
Trunk Area Water Main
.Commercial and Industrial $3,020/Ac.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to
cover the cost
of this project are
as follows:
Item
.'Project Cost Revenue
Balance
Pressure Reducing Station.
$21,840
Trunk Water Main
.74,260
'Water Service
1,210
Trunk Area Water Assessment
$167,519
Lateral Benefit Assessment
99,484
Service Assessment.
1,210
$97,310
$268,213
+$170,903
There will be a remaining balance of
$170,903 from this
project to be
added to the Trunk Water Main
Fund.
Z� 3 -
011le
U
u
•
L
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Receive Bids/Award Contract
Construction completion
Assessments Hearing
First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes
011le
- 4 -
Z, Z—
November 6
December 2
Spring 1987
Summer 1987
Fall 1987
Winter 1987
May 1989
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SUPERAMERICA (SPLASHLAND WATER PARK)
TRUNK WATER MAIN
PROJECT NO. 483
A. PRESSURE REDUCING STATION
LUMP SUM Pressure Reducing Station @ L.S.
LUMP SUM Surface Restoration @ L.S.
+ 5% Contingencies
+ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL PRESSURE REDUCING STATION .........
B. TRUNK WATER MAIN
LUMP SUM Clear and Grub Curb and Street @ L.S.
30 L.F. Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter @ $5.00/L.F.
80 S.Y. Remove Bituminous Surfacing @ $2.00/S.Y.
1,700 L.F. 12" DIP Water Main @ $21.00/L.F.
30 L.F. 6" DIP Water Main @ $15.00/L.F.
1 Each 12".x 12".Wet Tap w/ Gate Valve @ $2,000.00/Each
2 Each 12" Butterfly Valve @ $750.00/Each
3 Each 6" Resilient Wedge Gate Valve @ $350.00/Each
1 Each Salvage and reinstall 12" DIP Plug @ $150.00/Each
3,200 Lbs. ' Fittings @ $1.00/Lbs.
3Each Hydrant @ $1,000.00/Each
20 L.F. .Salvage & Reinstall Chain Link Fence @ $10.00/L.F.
30 L.F. B618 Concrete Curb. 5 Gutter @ $7.00/L.F.
80 S.Y. Bituminous Surfacing @ $25.00/S.Y.
20 L.F. Salvage b Reinstall 12" RCP @ $20.00/L.F.
1,730 L.F. Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/L.F.
2 Acres Seed @ $1,000.00/Acre
+ 5% Contingencies
+ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
TOTAL TRUNK WATER MAIN ..................
5 -
011le 7-3
$15,000
1,000
$16,000
800
$16,800
5,040 •
$21,840
$ 500
150
160
35,700
450
2,000
1,500
1,050
150
3,200 •
3,000
200
210
2,000
400
1,730
2,000
$54,400
2,720
$57,120
17,140
$74,260
C. WATER SERVICE
60
L.F.
1"
Type "K" Copper Water Service @ $7.00/L.F.
$
420
1
Each
1"
Corporation Stop @ $30.00/Each
30
1
Each
1"
Curb Stop @ $80.00/Each
80
30
Ton
Cl.
5 Aggregate, 100% Crushed Quarry Rock @ $10.00/Ton
300
60
L.F.
Mechanical Trench Compaction @ $1.00/L.F.
60
$
890
+ 5% Contingencies
40
•
$
930
+ 30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 6 Bond Interest
280
•
011ie
TOTALWATER SERVICES ............................... $1,210
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
SUPERA14ERICA (SPLASHLAND WATER PARK)
TRUNK WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 483
A. TRUNK AREA WATER MAIN ASSESSMENT
Parcel Description Area
(Acre)
SW 1/4, Section 19
Total
Rate/Acre Assessment
Parcel
015-50
8.64
$3,020
$ 26,093
Parcel
011-54
8.96
3,020
27,059
Parcel
011-57
20.17
3,020
60,913
Parcel
011-51
1.86
3,020
5,617
Parcel
013-56
0.15
3,020
453
S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES, BLOCK 1
Lot 1
8.62
$ 3,020
$ 26,032
Lot 2
6.83
3,020
20,627
Outlot
A
0.24
3,020
725
TOTAL
.............
$167,519
B. LATERAL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT
Assessable
Total
Parcel
Description
Footage
Rate/F.F.
Assessment
(Front Foot)
SE 1/4,
SECTION 19
Parcel
015-50
1200 (1)
39.14
$ 46,968
Parcel
010-52
215 (2)
39.14
8,415
Parcel
011-54
50.47
39.14
1,975
Parcel
011-57
730.29 (2)
39.14
28,584
Group W Addition
346 (3)
39.14
13,542
TOTAL.......
$99,484
7 -
011le L—�
(1) Front footage only for portion of parcel SE of Sibley Terminal
Drive. Actual footage to be determined based on finallocation of
water main.
(2) Corner lot credit of 150' applied.
(3) Unbuildable and corner lot credits of 504' applied.
C. SERVICE ASSESSMENT
Total
Parcel Description Number Services Assessment
Parcel 010-52 1 $1,210
•
011le
8 -
G�
Parcel
Description
SW 1/4, SECTION 19
Parcel 015-50
Parcel 011-54
Parcel 011-57
Parcel`011-51
Parcel 013-56
Parcel 010-52
Group W Addition
SUMMARY PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT ROLL
PROJECT NO.
Trunk Area Lateral Benefit Service
26,093
46,968
27,059
1,975
60,913
28,584
5,617
453
8,415
13,542
S & W INDUSTRIAL ACRES, BLOCK 1
Lot 1 26,032
Lot 2 20,627
Outlot A 725
011le
9 -
z7
1,210
TOTAL.............
Total
Assessment
73,061
29,034
89,497
5,617
453
9,625
13,542
26,032
20,627
725
268,213
E
•
at•a
I..Y
1
1
1
PR O:
RED CIb
• 1
W
N
2
J
Q4
L
EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING PRESSURE.
REDUCING STATION
1
CPO
3 a w
ATIO AO&S '
// YtRI
N■ I
I
PROPOSED 12 DIP
WATER MAIN I ■
I . •d .ar d
o■.n W I C] r®
c� I�
I �
ASSESSMENTS LEGEND 1z
® TRUNK AREA "■' IQ
D No. 30 --- LATERIAL BENEFIT DIF FL ROAD
ry ma
ma
Y■a
SUPERAMERICA (SPLASHLAND BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK
WATER PARK) Engineersem& Architects
IUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota
PROJECT NO. 483Date: NOV. ee -]L FIG. 1
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49403
Z
m
y
-- CARNELWN LANE
5 �xr1P�
1O a
CEDAR
1
1
.
I
■
L-- SAPPHIRE LANE
4
a• `
I
1
■ OPME
I
I
1
SUPERAMERICA (SPLASHLAND BONESTROO, ROSENE. ANDERLIK
WATER PARK) Engineersem& Architects
IUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS St. Paul, Minnesota
PROJECT NO. 483Date: NOV. ee -]L FIG. 1
EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. 49403
Z
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986-, City Council Meeting
Page Seven
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/PYLON SIGN FOR ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS
A. Conditional Use Permit (ABF Freight Systems) for a Pylon Sign
for a Truck Company on Lots 3 - 6, Plainview Addition --A public
• hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their
last regular meeting held on October 28, 1986 to consider a
Conditional Use Permit application submitted by ABF Freight
Systems for a pylon sign located along Lexington Avenue, north of
the E -Z Airpark facility. The Advisory Planning Commission is
recommending approval of this application.
This item was reviewed by the City Council at their November 1-8
meeting. There were a number of questions raised about the
pending assessments that will be assessed against ABF Freight
Systems as a condition of the pylon sign approval. Due to the
absence of the applicant, this item was continued until the
December 2, 1986 meeting.
The applicant has been notified and is planning to be present.
For additional information on this item refer to the planning
40 depa tment report. A copy is enclosed on pages _136 through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Conditional Use Permit as presented by ABF Freight Systems for a
pylon sign.
Z�
CITY OF EAGAN
®ASSESSMENTS: Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Plainview Subdivision were
assessed the following trunk area assessments:
Project # Description Usage
12 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Commercial
14/179 Water Area Commercial
(1) 302 Storm Sewer Trunk Commercial
The following assessments are proposed as a condition for the
issuance of the conditional use permit:
Description Project # Usage Rate Quantity Amount
Trailway C/I $11.81/FF 485 FF $ 5,727.85
Street C/I 78.45/FF 485 FF 38,048.25
Storm Sewer Trunk (1) 302 C/I $ .075/SF 74,693 SF 5,601.98
(1) To correct the understatement of areas when Project #302 was assessed.
30
SUBJECT:
CONDITIONAL USE
APPLICANT:
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS
LOCATION:
LOTS 3-6 PLAINVIEW ADDITION, NW 1/4 SECTION.2
EXISTING ZONING:
L. I. (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
OCTOBER 28, 1986
DATE OF REPORT:
OCTOBER 17, 1986
REPORTED BY:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
•APPLICATION
SUMMARY: An •application has been submitted by ABF
Freight Systems requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a pylon
sign located along Lexington
Avenue just north of the E -Z Airpark
facility.
The proposed. interior lighted pylon will be 22' tall with a
two sided 6' x 8' (42 sq.
ft.) signage area. This sign will
be a minimum 300' from the
E. Z; Airpark pylon and 10' within
the property as Code requires.
On December 3, 1985, the
City Council •approved a Conditional
Use for outside storage of
vehicles at this location. At that
time a condition required
an updated Landscape Plan approved'
by City Staff. A plan was submitted, approved, but not implemented
by the owners.
®ASSESSMENTS: Lots 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the Plainview Subdivision were
assessed the following trunk area assessments:
Project # Description Usage
12 Sanitary Sewer Trunk Commercial
14/179 Water Area Commercial
(1) 302 Storm Sewer Trunk Commercial
The following assessments are proposed as a condition for the
issuance of the conditional use permit:
Description Project # Usage Rate Quantity Amount
Trailway C/I $11.81/FF 485 FF $ 5,727.85
Street C/I 78.45/FF 485 FF 38,048.25
Storm Sewer Trunk (1) 302 C/I $ .075/SF 74,693 SF 5,601.98
(1) To correct the understatement of areas when Project #302 was assessed.
30
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS - CONDITIONAL USE.
PAGE 2
CONDITIONS•
1. Implementation of the previously submitted Landscape Plan,
approved on December 3, 1985.
2. The one time Sign Fee of $2.50/square foot.
3. All applicable Sign Ordinances.
4. The applicant shall either pay the assessment amounts or
execute a waiver of hearing to have them spread as special
assessments.
E
•
A"MiNV
g6Vv OW 1.J,�lt (. c
Q LICK p�KC wl'V
i
E.' DFEY
3v
AyTTq �f+i4AlY � �R '
- � RaaAKj-PfA.OVG CCM
wDp. rE-yuu TC
W.TiYL. �}YVC. al1C-
Py+T. M�YER !YE �. 4nnR2
a.wrvvnur� (Dour c+v e� Duro
IlVPMaO
DT� TYJ'T PVF¢
).R:OA Bei IJ l0 fSTrN MR8?SL.
-� Goo .w LJ.YE� DF VK..nlE9
�,w u.uro 4
cora m r c�src- A z• vnose aaw.
DML. p�CCFLLl YIT� �rGIPIBO �
/1WJf11w' GN—
J�
PLANTING DETAIL'
aA-0
1a-A�1,ae-
MY 4+
I -DCW O.C.
`r+�rrNh uues�
t' O.C.
TW /NWif✓
-s
��BUILDIN w. -?p �
_N+xW inywD(L�
��wxw, uw uR NfEi
2750 SO. LEXINGTON - PLANTING PLAN S FENCE LAYOUT
U
U
1 COMMON NAME
BOTANICAL NAME
isizE
I TYVE
A
M
WPW N � "A
R�MW» RNYM.vN.W+h
%N')lWJJf '2lR(M'
LK'-
ce
I ■
L
wm4hy NYLL
ir1I1 RKNYVfA
avt
to
C
4
WLNLO &1 m V?"
MMA N eAlk) ILUZA
v
VD
0
1
e^m �P
(onAri 1TOIT i]WA
fl.^Ar Lh In M n
L1l
Nf
PLANT
FENCE 18
1
1a AMa. OIAYATE) r(�
)AORIRY LOS � � f
eua�
r_�
•
APC Minutes
October 28, 1986
Harrison moved,
the November meeting
Planning Commission
further information
the Commission that
meeting and the pr
days to review the
necessary, at the n
were specifically
acre and the highris ,
zoning in light of the Comprehens v
problems with requests for additional
information was requested from st
Agreement and the maximum density all
that may have occurred. All voted in
Voracek seconded the motion to continue
There was discussion in regard to
continue the matter on it own
be n essary at the next meeting. I[
the applicant had requested the
pre m tint, and thus the. Co ission
request or rezoning, call' g for
ext Plannin Commission mee ing. Sta
directed to address the ' sue of den
e building i addition t the need f
the application to
the ability of the
initiative, should
was the opinion of
continuance at this
would still havii 60
a continuance,` if
ff and the developer
dens
of 25 units per
or more commercial
id Amendment process, and City-wide
tial zoning. In addition, further
in regard to the Blackhawk Park PUD
thereunder, and any density swaps
ADVENT UNITED METHODISZ CHURCH -
USE PERMIT
The public hearing in rega to the reque of Advent United Methodist
Church ,for conditional use per it for a sign in exc ss of 7 feet in height was
then convened by Chairper n McCrea. Mr. Dale unkle indicated that the
proposed sign met all City rdinance requirements, rel tive to signs. There
being no appearance o/Hai
alf of the applicant or he public, the public
hearing was closed. son moved, Wilkins seconded th motion to recommend
approval of the condiuse permit for the 25 foot sign made of Cedar with
two signage areas ofimately 4 feet in width, subject the condition
that the sign meet all City Code requirements, including set back from lot
lines. All voted in favor.
ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
The next public hearing of the evening was convened by Chairperson McCrea
upon the application of ABF Freight Systems for a conditional use permit for a
pylon sign, 22 feet in height, with two 6 by 8 foot signage areas on Lots.3
through 6, Plainview Addition in the northwest quarter of Section 2. City
Planner Runkle explained that the application was necessary because the sign
exceeded a 7 foot height limitation, and he provided the history of the use of
this parcel of property. He also indicated that the sign was 380 feet from
the nearest pylon sign owned by E-2 Airpark. The developer was present but
made no presentation. There was no one from the public requesting a hearing.
At the Commission's request, Mr. Runkle pointed out that the landscape plan
would be completed or a bond submitted for completion of it as a condition to
issuance of the conditional use permit.
Mr. Colbert addressed the issue of the $49,000.00 in assessments which had
been previously overlooked when improvements were installed for the benefit of
this parcel. The applicant indicated that he had just received this
information and was forwarding it to the owner's Corporate office.
3V-
2
APC Minutes
October 28, 1986
Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the
conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions:
1.. Implementation of the previously submitted Landscape Plan, approved on
December 3, 1985.
2. There shall be a one-time Sign Fee of $2.50 per square foot.
3. All applicable Sign Ordinances shall be adhered to.
4. The applicant shall either pay the assessment amounts or execute a
Waiver of.Hearing to have them spread as special assessments.
All voted aye.
OPUS CORPORATION - WAIVER OF PLAT •
Chairperson McCrea then convened the hearing in regard to the request for
waiver of plat by Opus Corporation for Lots 6 and 14, Eagandale Center
Industrial Park, and Lot 3, 'Block 1, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 7,
to combine Tract "A" with the parcels north of Tr t "B" for a road in Tract
"C" as a separate parcel located in part of the outhwest quarter of Section
3, east of Pilot Knob Road, off of Eagandale Blv City Planner Runkle
introduced the proposal, adv'sing that the c -de-sac had been constructed, .
although not deeded over to he City. Due to he need for the cul-de-sac and
existing construction, it had ecome a'house- eeping issue to make sure that
the street would be deeded t the City and that the leftover parcel be
attached to an existing parcel Hall mov d, Harrison seconded the motion to
recommend approval of the waiver f platsubject to all applicable code
provisions and a park dedication a of .02 per square foot. All voted yes.
NORTHWESTERN BELL "PHONE - WAIVER OF PLAT 0
Chairperson McCrea then conv ed he public hearing in regard to the
application of Northwestern Bell elepho a for a waiver of plat to split a .11
acre parcel from Parcel No. 022-26 or a utility building located in the
northwest quarter of Section 2 , we at of D\wa
d, abutting County Road #30.
Mr. Dale Runkle advised the ommission te exhibit packet was in.error
and indicated that the p rcel was somewrger in size. He also advised
that the building is under construction anthe other permits had been
obtained. It appeared t t the waiver ot was a house -keeping issue to
allow ownership of th parcel by Northweell. Mr. Michael Minenko was
present as attorney fo Northwestern Bell Mr. Robert Dokken: Mr.
Dokken indicated that./the original condise permit was requested in
December of 1985 froth the Planning Commissd proved by the City Council
in. February of 1986 with the recommendatit t parcel size be increased
to allow for setbacks. The waiver of plateede in order to record the
deed. There was no one present to object to the proposal and the public
hearing was closed. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend
approval of the waiver of plat, subject to the condition that adequate
landscaping be provided for all Northwestern Bell substation sites in the City
of Eagan. All voted yea.
3
k} •,y': H:.4
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 19'86, City Council Meeting
Page Eight
KENNEL LICENSE RENEWALS
B. Kennel License Renewals --There are several kennel licenses that
are in order for renewal consideration by the City Council. A list
of these licenses and the number of dogs that were authorized for
each location is enclosed on page 0-7 .
• There have been several complaints, including a formal complaint by
residents adjacent to the Abel's, about barking dogs. The
complaints were made to City Hall and the Eagan Police Department at
the time the City contracted with Abel's to operate the City's
animal pound. The animal pound was relocated from the Abel's
property to Lakeside Animal Hospital as of November 1, 1986. Since
November 1, there have been no complaints at City Hall or the
Policpartment regarding the Abel's kennel, see attached memo on
page— from Captain Geagan regarding the Abel kennel license. A
letter was sent to Mr. Robert, swanick of Orrin Thompson Homes
stating that the kennel license for M,r. and Mrs. Abel would be
acknowledged for the remainder of 1986. If there was a problem with
dogs barking, residents could present their objections to the
reissuance of the kennel license at a December meeting. Residents
are aware of the December 2 date for considering the ,kennel license.
For a copy of that letter, refer to pages through _4//�.
• ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the kennel
licenses as presented for annual renewal.
1��
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT WITT
DATE: NOVEMBER 24, 1986
SUBJECT: KENNEL LICENSE RENEWALS - 1987
The following kennel license renewals are submitted for Council
approval:
William & Kim Abel
3506 Lexington Ave. S.
Kathleen Glibertson
3995 Dodd Road
Janis MacKimm
1690 County Rd. 30
® Donald Sandberg
1560 Yankee Doodle Rd.
,:37
Licensed in 1978. Approval
was given for 4 kennel and 2
house dogs.
Licensed in 1983. Approval
was given for 6 bassett
hounds.
Licensed in 1980. Specific
approval given for 20-25 dogs;
basset hound's, Russian wolf-
hounds, Scottish terriers,
dobermans, etc. License in
conformance.
Licensed in 1971. Approval
was given for 4 - 6 German
shorthairs.
police department
JAY M. BERTHE
cdimI.r von..
PATRICK J. GEAGAN
ndmimn...
KENNETH D. A52MANN
ow,.,I—C..mll
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
November 26, 1986
TO: Thomas Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Patrick Geagan, Captaih'
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR KENNEL RELICENSING BY
WILLIAM ABEL
On 11/1/86 the city moved it's impounded animals
from Bill Abel's kennel at 3506 Lexington Avenue
to Lakeside, Animal Hospital. I have researched
our files and have not been able to find any com-
plaints from Abel's neighbors since we've moved
the kennel. I called DTs. Judy Orchard and Mr.
Wittles,, who live, adjacent to the property. They
said the dogs continue to bark and they still find
it irritating and a nuisance.
Patrick Geagan
Captain
PG/kg
3�
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
ya_
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121
PHONE; (612) 454-8100
October 9, 1986
MR ROBERT J SWANICK, EXEC V PRES
ORRIN THOMPSON HOMES
1712 HOPKINS CROSSROAD
MINA MN 55313
Re: Petition to Consider D
Animal Pound at 3506 L
Dear Mr. Swanick:
t of the Citv's
BEA BLOMQUIST
Mayor
THOMAS EGAN
JAMES A. SMITH
VIC ELLISON
THEODORE WACHTER
Council Memb rs
THOMAS HEDGES
CIN Mmininrator
EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE
CIN Cler0.
The City of Eagan received a petition several weeks ago from
residents in Country Homes of Lexington Place. The purpose'of the
petition was to raise a welfare concern about the noise polution
caused by dogs barking at the City's animal pound located at 3506
Lexington Avenue South and operated by Mr. and Mrs. William Abel.
A public: hearing was set for the October 21, 1986, City Council
meeting at which time testimony would be taken and consideration
given to pursuing other sites for the animal pound.
I am pleased -to inform you that the City has looked for new
locations and was successful in negotiating a contract with the
owners and operators of the Lakeside Animal Hospital, a veterinary
clinic located within the City. Mr. and Mrs. Abel have agreed to
cancel their contract with the City of Eagan effective November 1
of this calendar year. As of that date, November 1, 1986, all
animals picked up for impounding will be taken to the new location.
As a result of this action, the City Council is removing the
public hearing from the October 21 agenda as originally scheduled.
The contract between the City of Eagan and Lakeside Animal
Hospital will be ratified by City Council action at the October 21
meeting.
Since Mr. and Mrs. Abel have a kennel license valid through the
remainder of this calendar year, they will be given an opportunity
from November 1 through the month of December to continue operating
a kennel. During the month of December when the kennel licenses
are given consideration for renewal for 1987,. the City would
accept any testimony by residents if there is still a problem
remaining at the Abel'sresidence with the barking of dogs. Any
testimony and input at that time would be considered by the City
Council as they make their decision regarding the renewal of a
kennel license.
THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY
LETTER TO ROBERT SWANICH
OCTOBER 9, 1986
PAGE TWO
On behalf of the Eagan City Council, we are hopeful that this
action will minimize, if not eliminate, the noise polution that
the Lexington Place neighborhood has experienced during this past
calendar year.
Sincerely,
Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
cc: Pat Geagan, Administrative Captain, •
Eagan Police Department
TLH/kf
f
•
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Nine
RESOLUTION/ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES FOR CITY SERVICES
A. Resolution Establishing Fees for Various City Services for
1987--A list of City fees including assessment rates,, utility
billing rates for water and sewer services, and building permits
are among the several -page list of fees that are considered for
adjustment in 1987. The fees were presented and discussed at
length by the Director of Finance, City Administrator, and City
• Council at a special workshop session held on November 24, 1986.
There was a reduction proposed by the City Council of the
building permit fees, and questions raised throughout the
discussion and evaluation of the list of fees which have been
addressed by the Director of Finance. For a copy of his memo and
resol,oution to adopt the fees, refer to pages_ through
S For a copy of the 19'87 fee schedule as recommended by
the City staff and adjusted by the City Council, refer to pages
NSA through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM': To approve or deny the
resolution establishing the fees for various City services for
1987.
7�
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE
DATE: NOVEMBER.26, 1986
SUBJECT: FEE SCHEDULE
Please find attached the revised fee schedule based on our
discussion and subsequent direction from the Ctiy Council at the
special meeting of November 21, 1986.
The purpose of this memo is to highlight the changes that were
made and to provide additional background on the questions that
were asked.
I have added the false alarm fees outlined in the City Code to
the fee schedule again for the purpose of consolidating all fees •
in one document. There is no change in amount.
The bingo investigation fee should have been listed as gambling,
and has been changed accordingly. Per the State Charitable
Gambling Board, the investigation fee relates to all gambling
activities and would therefore be proper as it relates to the
Eagan pull tab ordinance.
I have discussed the contractors licensing situation with Dale
Peterson. It is his opinion that it would be very difficult to
try to license any subcontractors because they do not apply for
any permits with the City. He prefers that the general
contractor remain the responsible party. It would certainly be
possible to add additional categories to the licensed contractor
list, it would, however, significantly increase the
administrative effort, most of which would fall upon the
S inspectors as they worked out in the field. The City Code
presently excepts subcontractors of a currently licensed
contractor, which general contractor is -responsible for all work
performed.
The current insurance requirement as defined in the City Code
calls for liability insurance and implies that the City will be
named. as an additional insured. I do not believe that has been
routinely done but will be reviewed.
The City Code also calls for a $5.,000 surety bond operating in
favor of the City and conditional that the City will be saved
harmless from any loss or damage by reason of improper or
inadequate work performed by•the holder of said license. In
discussing the bond', and insurance with Bruce Medvec, I have come
to the conclusion that the City in accepting bonding company
forms is probably not getting what the Code calls, for. He also
feels that the City and not the homeowner would have to collect
on the bond and would have the most success in the public health,
safety and welfare area and not so much with faulty workmanship.
We are clearly not getting performance bonds which run to the
homeowner.
•
•
Fee Schedule
November 26, 1986
Page Two
It appears that the bonding and insurance requirements are
proving that the contractors can obtain the items but are not
being used for anything else. Since everything except the fee is
specifically set within the City Code, changes would require an
amendment to the Code. If desired, I would suggest an in-depth
review of the matter as a separate project.
I have, reviewed the proposed building permit fees to reflect a
15 - 20$ increase as directed by the City Council. The following
table is a comparison of the current and proposed new rates.
1982 - 1985 MODIFIED UBC PERMIT FEE
COMPARISON
TOTAL VALUATION
$1 - $500
$501 - $2,000
$2,000 - $25,000
$25,001 - $50,000
$50,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $500,000
$500,001 - $1,000,000
$1,000,001 & Up *
UBC
REPRESENTATIVE FEES
MIDPOINT MODIFIED $
EXAMPLE 1982 1985 INCREASE
No Permit Required
$ 750
14.50
17.10
17.98
13,500
104.50
121.50
16.3$
37,500
228.50
266.10
16.5%
75,000
358.00'
416.00
16.2%
,-300,000
933.00
1103.50
18.3$
750,000
2058.00
2391.00
16.2%
2,000,000
5183.00
5328.50
2.8$
* Combined in 1982 Rates:
To $100,001 & Up
The building permit fees were last increased in June of 1981 when
the City went from the 1964 U.B.C. table to the 1979 U.B.C.
table. (There was no change in the U.B.C. tables in 1976, 1979
or 1982.)
The Building Inspections Department budget has increased from
$1,11,970. in 1981 to .$451,540 in the proposed 1987' budget.
Assuming that the relationship between permit fees and costs in
1981 was correct, the proposed fee increase is reasonable. Staff
has not had the time to complete a detailed study of costs
related more specifically to individual permits although more
work will be done in that area if the City Council so directs.
The per head notation on plumbing fixtures relates to the number
of shower heads in the property.
I have discussed the question of the 58 increase in the cost of
trailway construction with Tom Colbert. He noted that
contractors will not guarantee any 1987 rates because of their
�3
•
•
Fee Schedule
November 26, 1986
Page Three
fear of volatility in the prices. Given that uncertainty and
lacking a more detailed study; I think it would be appropriate to
proceed with this modest increase.
I believe that covers all the questions raised, if more
information is required, please let me know. Again, it is
important that action be taken at the December 2, 1986 City
Council meeting, so that appropriate parties can be notifiedof
the changes to be effective January 1, 1987.
9A V
® Finance irector/City Clerk
EJV/jeh
4
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR VARIOUS
CITY SERVICES, SUPPLIES AND MATERIALS
WHEREAS, various sections of the City Code provide for
fees to be established by Council resolution, and
WHEREAS, the City has incurred increased costs in
wages and materials and it is therefore necessary to increase
some of the costs to cover said increases; and
WHEREAS, certain fees are established in the City Code
and Changes require an amendment to the Code;
NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, that the fees as
listed in the attached shall be effective January 1, 1987;
• CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Motion Made By:
Seconded By:
Those in Favor:
Those Opposed:
Its Cler
•
• Dated: December 2, 1986 •
CERTIFICATION
I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota
County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing
resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this 2nd day of December, 1986.
E.J. Vanoverbeke, City Clerk
City Clerk
q5
FEE TYPE
Final Plat
SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING
1987
FEE
$100.00 Require Escrow
+$3/lot Deposits Per
Development Escrow
Policy
Preliminary Plat
300.00
Rezoning and Planned Dev.
250.00
PD -Annual Review
25.00
Conditional Use Permit
•
Initial
Renewal CUP
75.00
25.00
-
Variance
50.00
Waiver of Plat
100.00
Special Permit
50.00
Excavation Permit
250.00
Assessment Search
8.00
Vacation Proceedings
300.00
Industrial Revenue Bond and
Multifamily Housing Bond
Processing Fee
500.00
Zoning Map
3.00
Zoning Regulations (City Code-
10.00
Chapter 11)
Subdivision Regulations (City
10.00
Code -Chapter 13)
Traffic Regulations (City Code-
3.00
Chapter 8)
Parking Regulations (City Code-
3.00
Chapter 9)
Sign Regulations
2.50
City Code Each Chapter (All
5.00
Chapters Except 8,9,11,13)
Code Book
60.00
Code Book With Binder
75.00
�S A
BEER, LIQUOR AND WINE
Beer
Application and
Investigation
Off -Sale License
On -Sale License
Temporary License
Liquor
• Application and
Investigation
Off -Sale License
On -Sale License
Sunday License
On -Sale Club License
Less than '200
201-500
501-1,000
1,001-2,000
2,001-4,000
4,001-6,000
Over 6,000
Wine
Application and
Investigation
On -Sale License
Sunday License
Consumption and Display
Daily Sports or Convention
Duplicate License
FINANCE/CLERK
LIQUOR FEES
1987
FEE
$ 350.00(1)
40.00
175.00
25.00
300.00(2)
200.00
3,500.00
200.00
300.00
500.00
650.00
800.00
1,000.00
2,000.00
3,000.00
200.00(1)
200.00
100.00
25.00
50.00
2.00
(1)When Wine and Beer are applied for by the same applicant,
the total maximum investigation fee is $350.00.
(2)Also requires an escrow deposit of $1,000.00 for five persons
requiring investigation and $200 for each additional if ,the
investigation is conducted within Minnesota, or $2,000.00 for
five persons requiring investigation and $400.00 for each addi-
tional if the investigation is conducted outside of Minnesota.
x y�
•
E
FINANCE/CLERK
ADDITIONAL FEES
1987
FEE TYPE FEE
Gambling Investigation $ 250.00
Cigarette License 25.00
Mechanical Amusement
1-3 Machines 25.00
4-15 Machines' 200.00
15+ Machines 400,.00
1Y X17
•
•
Contractors Licenses
General Contractor
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
•
Heating, Ventilating
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Air Conditioning
& Certificate of Ins.
Masonry
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
Swimming Pool
$25.00 w/$5,,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
Roofing
$25.00 w/$5,000 Bond
& Certificate of Ins.
Plumbing
MN Master License No.
& $2;000 Bond &
Certificate of Ins.
•
Sewer and Water
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Ins.
Well Driller
MN Master License No.
& $2,000 Bond &
Certificate of Ins.
Day Care Permit (7-11)
25.00
1Y X17
•
•
•
E
FINANCE/CLERK
ADDITIONAL FEES
PACE 2
FEE TYPE
Rubbish Hauler
1st Truck
Each Additional
Service Station
Solicitors
Trailer Permit
Dog License
Male or Female,
Neutered or Spayed
Late Fee
Kennel Permit
Initial
Renewal
Photocopies
Fee Schedule
Animal Pick Up
Animal Impound
Permit Duplication Fee
Returned Check Fee
False Alarm
Commercial
Residential
1987
FEE
40.00
20.00
50.00
25.00
25.00
6.00 •
3.00
.50/mo
50.00
25.00
.50/page
2.00
10.00
2.00/day over amount
billed the City by
the pound
20.00
10.00
75.00 Per False Alarm
After 6 (City Code)
50.00 Per False Alarm
After 6 (City Code)
A- 4f
.•
i
FEE TYPE
Building Permit
Demolition Permit
Disposal Permit
Electrical Permit
Heating, Ventilating and Air
Conditioning
Moving Permit
Plumbing and Gas Fitting
Sign Permit
Wind Energy, Radio and
Television Tower Permit
Plan Check (Valuation
over $10,000)
INSPECTION FEES
1987
FEE
See Attached (Modified 1985
Uniform Building Code)
15.00
10.00
See. Schedule Attached
See Schedule Attached
15.00 Plus Cost of
Repairs and Escrow
See Schedule. Attached
2.50 per S.F.
See Attached (Modified 1985
Uniform Building Code)
50% of Permit Fee
•
•
BUILDING PERMITS
CITY OF EAGAN
1987 PERMIT FEES & LICENSING REQUIREMENTS
PERMIT FEES - RESIDENTIAL - Fees based on modified 1985 UBC Fee Schedule 50%
Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000.
Utility Charges - collected with permit fee
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $625.00
Water Availability Charge (WAC) - $525.00
Water Meter - $ 67.00
Road Unit Charge - $305.00
Treatment Plant Charge - $180.00
• $1.00 - $ 500.00 -- No Permit Required •
$501.00 - $ 2,000.00 -- $12.00 for the first $500.00 plus $1.70 for each
additional $100.00 or franation thereof, to and
including $2,000.00
$2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $37.50 for the first $2,000.00 plus $7.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof,
to and , including $25,000.00
$25,000.00 - $50,000.00 -- $198.50 for the first $25,000,00 plus $5.20 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to
and including $50,000.00
$50,001.00 - $100,000.,00 -- $328.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $3.50 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to
• and including $100,000.00
$100,000.00 - $500,000.00 -- $503.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.00 for
each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000 -- $1,703.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $2.75
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction
thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00
$1,000,000.00 and Up -- $3,078.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.25
for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof
FEES FOR APARTMENT BUILDINGS (ONE COMMON ENTRANCE & ONE LAUNDRY FACILITY)
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - 80% of $625 x number of units
Water Availability Charge (WAC) - 80,% of $525 x number of units
Water Meter - N/A
Road Unit - 80% of $305 x number of units
b 3 D
-flJ5%
STATE SURCHARGE
ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS
Valuation
of Structure
Surcharge
Addition
or Alteration
Computation
$1,000,000
or Less
.0005.x
Valuation
$1,000,001
to $2,000,000
$ 500
+ .0004 x (Value
- $1,000,000)
$2,000,001
to $3,000,000
$ 900
+ .0003 x (Value
- $2,000,000).
$3,000,001
to $4,000,000
$1,200
+ .0002 x (Value
- $3,000,000)
$4,000,001
to $5,000,000
$1,400
+ .0001 x (Value
-,$4,000,000)
$5,000,001
and Up
$1,500
+ .0005 x (Value
- $5,000,000)
-flJ5%
•
•
1987 CITY OF EAGAN PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
TYPE OF FIXTURE TYPE OF FIXTURE
Water Closet @ $3.00 Ea.
Bath Tub @ $3.00
Lavatory @ $3.00 Ea.
Shower (Per Head) @ $3.00 Ea
Sink @ $3.00 Ea.
Urinal @ $3.00 Ea.
Bidet @ $3.00
Laundry Tub @ $3.00 Ea.
Janitor Sink or Receptor @ $3.00 Ea.
Water Heater @ $3.00 Ea.
Floor 'Drain @ $1.50 Ea.
Water Stand Pipe @ $1.50 Ea.
Gas Pipe Outlets @ $1.50 Ea.
Rough Openings - No Fixtures @$1.50 Ea
Fixtures on Rough Openings @ $1.50 Ea
COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES: 1,% of Contract Fee With a Minimum Fee
of $20.00. State Surcharge is $.50
Per Each $1,000 of Fee (Not the
Contract Cost).
$12.00 Minimum Fee
------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------
1987 CITY OF EAGAN MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
RESIDENTIAL HEATING 01-100,000 BTU'S - $24.00, Each Additional
(Includes Cooling for New 50,000 BTU's or Fraction - $6.00
Construction)
RESIDENTIAL COOLING $12.00
(Add on)
MODIFICATIONS/ALTERATIONS $12.00 Minimum
COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES 1% of Contract Fee with a Minimum Fee of
$20.00. State Surcharge is $.50 Per Each
$1,000 of Fee (Not the Contract Cost)
•
•
CITY OF EAGAN
ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FEES
NOTE: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR EACH INSPECTION - $10.00
ALL PERMI-TS REQUIRE $.50 STATE SURCHARGE
1. Payment of fees - All electrical inspection fees are due and payable to
the City of Eagan at or before commencement of the installation and shall
be forwarded to the City of Eagan.
2. The fees for signs shall be computed in accordance with State schedule
with a minimum fee of $10.00 per sign.
3. Swimming pool ground fees shall be computed separately at $30.00 per
pool.
4. Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installation, replacement,
alteration or repair limited to one inspection only - $10.00.
5. Services, change of services,. temporary services, additions, alterations
or repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed
separately.
1 to 100 ampere,capacity........................................... $12.00
101 to and including 200 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ....... $15.00
For each addition of 100 amperes or fraction thereof ................$ 5.00
6. Circuit, installations or additions, alterations or repairs of each
circuit or subfeeder shall be computed separately including circuits fed
from subfeeders and including the equipment served. Circuits of 250
volts or less.
•
0
to and
including 30 ampere capacity ..............................$
3.00
shall be computed separately at $2.00 per
unit
31
to and
including 100 ampere capacity ............................$
5.00
For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ........ $ 4.00
For circuits over 250 volts, double the fee for 250 volts or less.
%. In addition to the above fees:
a. A charge of $1.50 will be made for each street lighting standard.
b. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal head'.
Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when
computing the fee. ,
EM
8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers and generators
for
lights, heat and power
shall be computed separately at $2.00 per
unit
i
plus $.10 per KVA up to
and including 100 KVA, 101 KVA and over at
$.05
per KVA. The maximum
fee for any transformer or generator in
this
- category is $20.00.
EM
9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers for signs and outline
lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction
thereof per unit, plus $.25 for each additional 100 VA or fraction
thereof.
b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first
appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $7.50 per
unit.
15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or corporation begin work
of any kind such as, hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from
the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured
the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either
previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on
the next succeeding day where such work ,is commenced on a Saturday or on
a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit,
be required to pay double the fees hereinbefore provided for such permit,
and shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance.
Holders of contractor license shall not obtain permits for electric work
unless the work is supervised by them and is perfomed by workmen employed
by them or their firm. //
10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed
by the initial installer), remote controls, signal circuits, fire warning
and security circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00
per each ten openings or, devices of each system plus $1.00 for each
additional opening.
11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed installations,
there shall be a minimum fee of $100.00 up to and including $30,000 of
electrical estimate, plus 1/10 of 1% on any amount in excess of $30,000
to be paid by persons or firms requesting the review.
12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions
have been corrected and such conditions are not the subject of an appeal
pending before the Board or any court, a reinspection fee of not to
®
exceed the original unit fee, or $10.00, whichever is less, may be
assessed in writing by•the inspector.
13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested special inspections
or services, the fee shall be $15.00 per man hour, including travel time,
plus $.20 per mile traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of
material consumed.
K�
This section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such
other jobs as determined by the inspector.
14. For inspections of transient project including, but not limited to,
carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees shall be computed as follows:
a. Power supply units —According to Item 4(b) (2) of fee schedule -
a like fee will be required on power supply units at each engagement
®
during the season, except that a fee of $15.00 per hour will be
charged for additional time spent by the inspector if the power
supply is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on
the request for inspection as required by law.
b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first
appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $7.50 per
unit.
15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or corporation begin work
of any kind such as, hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from
the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured
the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either
previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on
the next succeeding day where such work ,is commenced on a Saturday or on
a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit,
be required to pay double the fees hereinbefore provided for such permit,
and shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance.
Holders of contractor license shall not obtain permits for electric work
unless the work is supervised by them and is perfomed by workmen employed
by them or their firm. //
16: Additional Fees and/or Fee Shortage - Additional fees and/or fee
shortages must be received by the City within 14 days of written notice.
Ciq If additional fees and/or fee shortages are not received within 14 days
<V of notice, permits for electrical installations will not be accepted by
the City until such time as the additional fees and/or shortages are
received. Additional fees and/or fee shortages that are not received
within 14 days of notice are subject to a 10% per day penalty.
�1
5-
FEE TYPE
Trunk Assessment
Trunk Sanitary Sewer
Oversize
Unplatted
Platted Res.
Trunk Water Main
Oversize
Agricultural or
Residential
• Water Supply & Storage
& Main Oversizing
Comm. & Ind.*
Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize
Single Family
Multi -Family
Comm. & Ind.
ENGINEERING/ASSESSMENT
FEES
1987
FEE
$1,300/Ac.
625/Lot
1, 250/Ac.
600/Lot
11
3,170/Ac.
.053/S.F.
.067/S.F.
.079/S.F.
Lateral Benefit Assessment
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Sanitary Sewer 30.12/Centerline Foot
Lateral Benefit from
Trunk Water Main
Single Family 24.94/Centerline Foot
Multi -Family
Comm. & Ind. 41.10/Centerline Foot
Street Assessment
Equivalent Zoning
STREET - Residential
Equivalent (321) 35.44/F.F.
Multiple Equivalent (44') 66.53/F.F.
Comm./Ind. Equivalent (521) 82.37/F.F.
TRAILWAY - (Concrete or '
Bituminous) 12.40/F.F.
* Main Oversizing Shall Be $1,250/Acre and
Water Supply and Storage Shall Be $1,920/Acre
'S4
ENGINEERING/ASSESSMENTS FEES
PAGE 2
1987
FEE TYPE' FEE
Lateral Storm Sewer
Equivalent Assessment Rate
Maintenance Equipment & Personnel
Foreman w/Pickup Truck
Single Axle Truck w/Operator
Tandem Truck w/Operator
Tractor w/Operator
Backhoe/Loader w/Operator
® Front End Loader w%Operator
Road Grader w/Operator
Foreman
Maintenance Person
Street Sweeper w/Operator
Topographic Maps
50KW Generator W/Operator
Sewer Jetter W/Operator
Sewer Rodder W/Operator
•
10.30/F.F.
42.00/Hr.
47.00/Hr.
52.00/Hr.
32.00/Hr.
52.00/Hr.
73.00/Hr.
73.00/Hr.
20.00/Hr.
17.00/Hr
58.00/Hr.
6.30/Acre
52.00/Hr.
58.00/Hr.
.t .50.00/Hr.
•
•
UTILITY RATES & FEES
Treatment Plant Charge 180.00
Water Supply & Storage (WAC)
Single Family 525/Lot
Multi -Family 420/Lot
Shut-off Charge 25.00
Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00
Late Fee 10% of Balance
W
0
1987
FEE TYPE
FEE
Sanitary Sewer
Single Family, townhouse
MN $17.85/Qtr. for 15,000
and Similar Residential
Gal. $1.10/1000 Gal. for
All Usage Over 15,000 Gal.
Based on Winter Quarter
Meter Reading
Apartment, Institutional
MN $17.85/Qtr. for 15,000
Commercial & Industrial
Gal. $1.10/1000 Gal. for
All Usage Over 15,000 Gal.
Sewer only (Sewer with no
Flat Rate - $24.15/Qtr.
water connection/meter to
measure flow
Water Works
All users
MN $17.00/Qtr for 15,000
Gal. & $.73/1000 Gal.for
All Usage'Over 15,000 Gal.
Street Light Energy
Single Family/Twin Homes
(R-1, R-2)
$2.50 Per Quarter Per Lot
Townhouses (R-3)
$2.00 Per Quarter Per Unit
®
'Multiple Residential &
$17.50 Per Quarter Per
Comm./Ind. (R74, C/I).
Billing Acct.
Road Unit Charge
$305.00
Sewer Availability Charge (SAC)
Single Family (R1 and R2)
$625
Other
MWCC
Treatment Plant Charge 180.00
Water Supply & Storage (WAC)
Single Family 525/Lot
Multi -Family 420/Lot
Shut-off Charge 25.00
Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00
Late Fee 10% of Balance
W
0
UTILITY FEES CONT.
PAGE 2
FEE TYPE
After Hours Work
1987
FEE
A. Call Out - Labor Rate
2.5 Hr. Minimum +
10% Administrative
B. Extended Day
Labor + 10% Admin.
* Includes Copperhorn
Water Meter Removal
$ 30.00
Water Meter Replacement
$ 30.00
•
•
Water Meters
5/8" x 3/4" meter*-
67.00
3/4 water meter*
93.00
1" water meter
106.00
1 1/2" water meter
273.00
2" water meter
381.00
3" compound
1,160.00
4" compound
1,848.00
6" compound
3,570.00
3" turbo meter
620.00
4" turbo meter
1,045.00
6" turbo meter
1,838.00
#2 copperhorn w/swivel
16.00
Remote wire (over 35')
0.06/Ft
* Includes Copperhorn
•
n
PARRS AND RECREATION
FEE TYPE
Parkland Dedication
Single Family
Duplex
Townhouse/Quad
Apartments/Multiple
Commercial and Industrial
Park Fees
Picnic Kit
Rahn Building
Trapp Farm Pavillion
Enclosed Shelter Buildings
Open Shelters
Athletic Facilities/Shelters
Fields
Lights (If Required)
Building Cleaning
Damage Deposit
Community Rooms
Youth and Non -Profit
Others
Profit and Fund Raising
Chuckwagon Grill
Canopy
1987
FEE
$471.00
445.00
382.00
392.00
0.044/s.F.
3.00
50.00 Per Day
35.00 1/2 Day
5.00 Per Hour for Each
Hour over 5
$30.00 Minimum
15.00
30.00 Per Field Per Day
20.00 Per Field Per Day
30.00
-100.00
0.00
15.00
50.00
15.00
50.00/Day
S
11
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Ten
A. PUBLIC
c ADDITIONAL,-ITEMS,I
CONTRACTS
CONTRACT 86-23, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1, HOLLAND LAKE —
TRUNK STORM SEWER
-l.. Contract 86-23, Approve Change Order #1, Holland Lake - Trunk
Storm Sewer --There are 3 parts to this Change Order described as
follows:
10 Part A: This provides for the substitution of a plastic
polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe in lieu of the base bid ductal
iron pipe (DIP) for the force main portion of this trunk
storm sewer project. This substitution will result in a
DEDUCT of $27,075.
Part B: In order to minimize construction disturbance and
inconvenience to the residents and property of the Lakewood
Hills Addition, a section. of this storm sewer outlet is
proposed to be constructed by a tunneling method along a
common lot line in lieu of the open trench construction down
public street right-of-way. Although the tunneling
construction is more expensive, the shorter distance results
in a net DEDUCT of $9,225.215..
® Part C: After investigating alternative lift station
equipment and pumps, this Change Order provides for the
installation of a different manufacturer lift station at a
net DEDUCT of $45,000.84.
All alternates have been investigated and research thoroughly by
both the Public Works Director and the consultant engineer and it
is the combined recommendation that this Change Order be approved
for a combined deduct of $81,301.09.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #1 to
Contract 86-23 (Holland Lake Trunk Storm Sewer) for a total
deduct of $81,301.09.
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Eleven
CONTRACT 85-21, APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #3 (MAINTENANCE BLDG)
2. Contract 85-21, Approve Change Order #3 (Maintenance
Building) --This Change Order consists of 5 parts described as
follows:
Part A: With the approval of Change Order #1 expanding the
.; vehicle storage area an additional 25 feet the access drive
had to be extended an equal amount with concrete curb and
gutter and bituminous surfacing. (Add $1,643)
Part B: In anticipation of operational problems during heavy
snowfall periods, the original proposed chain link security
fence swinging gate into the vehicle maintenance yard was
revised to a cantilevered sliding design. (Add $995)
Part C: Concrete curb and gutter section was increased in
the vicinity of heavy vehicle equipment to provide increased
strength. (Add, $400)
Part D: The storm sewer line draining the parking lot on the
west side of the maintenance facility was realigned to avoid
a conflict with the proposed future salt storage shed
resulting in 'additional manholes and increased quanitities.
(Add $2,750)
Part E: During the installation of the storm sewer line on
the east side of the building, the alignment conflicted with
the newly installed sanitary sewer line constructed from the
Hampton Heights project resulting in the installation of an
additional manhole and bends to the storm sewer line. (Add
$1.,725)
The total amount of this Change Order (add $7,513) is within the
anticipated amount of $23,750 under the original budget for this
project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approve Change Order #3 to
Contract 85-21 (Maintenance Facility Remodeling/Expansion) and
authorize the Public Works Director to execute all related
documents.
M
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twelve
DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
B. Developers Task Force Recommended Policy for Temporary Signs --
At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the City staff was
directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of
temporary advertising signs at the intersection of city collector
and/or county roads. This policy was presented at the April
1, 1986,City Council meeting for review and consideration. At that
City Council meeting, official action was taken to "continue
consideration of the policy with the request that staff review
the proposal and prepare and submit guidelines regarding locations,
sizes, costs, color priorities and users to the City Council
® for later consideration." City staff did respond to this direction
by presenting information at the June 17, 1986 City Council meeting.
At that meeting a motion was adopted by the City Council, reading,
as follows: "the City Council generally favors the concept as
submitted by the staff, and requested the Developers Task Force,
together with the staff, review the request and submit recommenda-
tions including the following: 1) Sizes of signs, with suggested
12'' maximum height, 2) suggested locations, 3) the number of
ads on each of the signs, 4) material for the ads, including
removal of the signs and ads, 5) duration of the signs, 6) a proposal
that when a subdivision is 85% completed, the Council will not
renew the permit for the developer's sign, 7) prices and materials
should be reviewed and recommended to the Council, 8) safety
consideration shall be reviewed, and '9)sign placement, whether in
county or city rights-of-way or on private property shall be
studied. Further, it was understood that the existing temporary
sign permits be allowed through June 30, 1987, but that the City
• then require compliance with the new regulations, or until the
expiration of the temporary sign permit, whichever occurs last.
All Councilmembers voted affirmatively."
The Developers Task Force met and discussed the proposed regulatory
changes for temporary advertising signs at their September 24,
October 8 and most recently, November 12 meetings. There were
a number of concerns expressed at the November 12 meeting, about
the pros and cons of' using a reader board, as suggested in concept
by the City Council. Members of the committee expressed a concern
that a motorist would not have enough information from a reader
board and further that a reader board suggests continued directional
signage throughout the City in order to route a motorist to a
particular development. The Task Force was extremely sensitive
to the aesthetic concerns that originally suggested a reader
board as opposed to the hodge podge of temporary advertising
signs that currently exist at various intersections throughout
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 198'6, City Council Meeting
Page Thirteen
the City. After further 'consideration of the proposed reader
board, members of the Task Force felt that advertising/directional
signs are important for the benefit of the motorists at major
intersections throughout the City. The Task Force, after a lengthy
deliberation, is recommending to the City Council "a directional
advertising sign with a square footage not to exceed 20 square
feet and 4' X 5' in dimension, including any protrusion of the
sign. Furthermore, that the sign must be located on private
property, cannot obstruct any sight lines and there will be no
more than four signs per intersection with a restriction of two
per quadrant and further, that the sign not be allowed to exceed
® a seven foot elevation above grade." It was the feeling of the
Task Force that the City would 1) gain uniformity and control
over the number of temporary advertising signs, 2) provide a
benefit and service by providing both advertising and directional
needs to the motorist, and 3) the City would not be required
to negotiate land, construct the reader boards and sell advertising,
lessening the administrative responsibility to the City.
For additional information, copies of reports that were reviewed
earlier this year regarding the. concept of a reader board and'
the November 12 minutes of the Developers Task Force, are enclosed
on pages 62—'5� through 78 for your information.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To give consideration
to the recommendation to the Developers Task Force regarding
a regulatory change to the City Code or directional advertising
Is signs.
Agenda Information
�. June'17, 1986, City
Page Twenty -Five
Memo
Council Meeting
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGN REGULATIONS
D. Consideration and Review of Temporary Advertising Sign
Regulations --At the January 7, 1986 City Council meeting, the
City staff was directed to prepare a policy consideration for
the location of temporary advertising signs at the intersections
of city collector and/or county roads. ' The policy was presented
at the April 1, 1986 City Council meeting for review and considera-
tion. For a copy of a memo of direction by the City Administrator
and a study completed by the Sign Inspector and Chief Building
Inspector, refer to pages /oy through /d Following review
and consideration of the temporary advertising signs policy,
Councilmember Ellison suggested "that one sign be permitted at
each intersection which would include several developers and
one standard with each developer potentially being able to place
a sign on more then one standard . After discussion, Smith moved,
Wachter seconded the motion to continue consideration of the
policy with the request that staff review the proposal and prepare
and submit guidelines regarding locations, sizes, costs, color
priorities and users to the City Council for later consideration.
All voted yea." Following the motion, specific direction was
given to the City Administrator which is outlined in the attached
"Y memo enclosed on pages /OSS through 4_ to the Chief Building
Inspector. Mr. Borgschatz has responded to the April 4 memo,
and for a copy of his findings, refer to pages '/D through
F;r The cost projected for a steel sign seems high, however, individual
signs that are being purchased and placed by developers throughout
the community at various intersections are expensive and in some
cases might compete with the cost for one reader board. There
are many considerations, such as 1) The City monitoring .the
program as outlined by our Sign Inspector, 2) to adopt by ordinance
A temporary advertising sign and then submit a request for proposal
and allow various sign companies to bid on the reader board and
manage the same for the City of Eagan. In other words, a developer
would contact the sign company directly and buy time on the reader
board at the quote presented to the City. 3) Developers will
be restricted with the information that can be placed on a reader
board, eliminating use of their logo and other marketing informa-
tion. 4) Steel signs are certainly more expensive then
signs but require much less maintenance. The City could erect
the reader board signs during winter months, therefore providing
both the management and construction/installation service.
1
Reader boards at strategic locations throughout the City would
eliminate numerous temporary advertising signs that are being
placed by developers, and builders. Additional philosophy should
be considered regarding 1) the amount of regulatory control the
&5
Agenda Information Memo
June 17, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Six
TEMP ADVERTISING SIGNS CONT'D
City desires to place on builders and developers advertising
their business within the City. 2) I£ additional regulatory
control is desired, whether the City or private sector should
manage the installation of the signs. Because of the investment
certain developers and builders have made in temporary advertising
signs, any change in policy might require- either a sunset or
grandfather provision, to slowly eliminate those signs that are
currently in existence while freezing any replacement of new
temporary advertising signs.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To discuss and provide addi-
tional direction as to whether the City wishes to amend its Sign
Ordinance by regulating the use of reader boards for any and
all temporary advertising signs throughout the City.
a
MEMO TO: BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986
SUBJECT: NEW POLICY FOR FUTURE CONSIDERATION AND
LOCATION OF TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action thatwas taken by the Eagan City Council at
their regular meeting held on Tuesday, January 7, 1986, staff was
directed to prepare a policy consideration for the location of
temporary advertising signs at the intersections of City collector
and/or County roads., The City Council commends your department on
the excellent work that Elmer Borgschatz and you have performed in
tightening up and carrying out regulatory provisions set for the
location of signs throughout the City. In a discussion at the
meeting, it is the desire of the City Council to develop additional
policy that will further tighten up. the location of temporary
advertising signs throughout the City. •
First, the City Council would like an inventory of signs that are
located on major City collector roads such as Blackhawk and all
County roads throughout the. City. This inventory or list of
existing. signs would include the duration (what amount of time is
remaining of the two-year, temporary status) and the quality of
the existing sign.
Secondly, the City Council is asking that the policy for consider-
ation include several of the 'following points: 1) temporary
advertising signs must be placed in a specific location not to
block any sight distance or view for the motorist; 2) consider-
ation should' be given to the adoption of criteria that would
establish a distance between temporary advertising signs (much the
same as general advertising) for aesthetic purposes; 3) a require-
ment would exist that. all adjacent property owners must be notified
and provide consent for. the placement of a temporary advertising
sign; 4) the size and type of structure for a temporary advertising
sign should again be reviewed; 5) consideration should be given to
criteria that would establish a maintenance provision allowing
City staff to require certain on-going maintenance of a temporary
advertising sign; and 6) other conditions that might be suitable
for a new temporary sign policy.
The City Council would like the inventory completed and a policy
to review by the first meeting in March. With the amount of
growth that is occurring, we anticipate the request for many more
temporary advertising signs; therefore, there is some urgency in
preparing a new policy for City Council consideration.
1 City Administrator
TLH/kf
(�7
Agenda Information Memo
April 1, 1986, City Council Meeting
Page Twenty -Seven
REVIEW CURRENT POLICY/TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
B. Review of Current Policy for Temporary Advertising Signs --The
City staff was directed, at a recent City Council meeting, to
inventory all temporary advertising signs on major collector roads
throughout the city. Further action taken at the January 7, 1986,
City Council meeting directed the City staff to prepare options for
revisions to the sign ordinance and sign policy concerning advertis-
ing directional signs. C.
Procedure requiring acceptable maintenance conditions has been
established by the Protective Inspections Department along with an
inventory that was completed and copied to each member of the City
Council during early March. There are many regulatory alternatives
to review, however, the three (3) options listed in the Chief
Building Official's Report were as follows:
Option 1. Leave the City Code 4.20 subdivision 1C9 and allow
the City Council to grant special permits using the
criteria of City 4.20 subdivisions 2 & 3 which
establish setbacks and standards.
Option 2: Limit temporary signs to a one-year maximum time
span, limited to Eagan developments only, area
limitation of 24 sq.feet, limit top edge of sign at
9 feet above street level: limit bottom edge of sign
to 6 feet above s`rea_ level, a limit •of two (2)
signs per intersection corner, and a minimum of 50
feet separation between signs.
Option 3: An immediate moratorium on all temporary advertising
signs and phase out existing signs as permits
expire.
Enclosed on page is a copy of the sign survey of 31 inter-
sections in Eagan. If any member of the City Council has misplaced
the specific sign locations, an additional copy can be made avail-
able. `
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or suggest a
regulatory change for the control and issuance of temporary adver-
tising signs. ,y
Total
SIG`I SURVEY OF
THIRTY ONE INTERSECTIONS IN EAGAN
Hwy 149 -& Lone Oak Rd
— No
sign
Hwy 149 -& Yankee Doodle
- 1
sign
(
3 sised, in sw corner
Dodd Rd -& Diffley
- 2
"
(
SW corner
HwF 3 -& Diffley
- 1
"
(
SW corner, Homeowners Produce for sale) no permit
Cliff Rd-& Hwy 3
- 1
!',
(
SW corner )
Cliff Pd & Dodd Rd
- 2
"
(
1 in NW, 1 in NE corner)
Cliff Rd & Lexington
- 2
"
(
NE.corner )
Cliff Rd & Pilot Knob
- 3
"
(
NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Thomas Lake
- 3
"
(
1 in, NE , 2 in NW corner )
Cliff Rd & Safari/ B H
- 2
"
(
1 in NE , 1 in S.E corner )
Cliff Rd & Johnny Cake
- 1
"
(
SE corner )
Cliff Rd & Galaxie
- 1
"
(
SE corner )
Cliff Rd & Rahn Rd
- 3
"
(
3 in NE corner )
Cliff Rd & Nicols
- 2
"
(
1 BP in ITE corner, 1 BP in SE Corner )
Cliff Rd & Slater
- 1
"
(
1 in SW corner Service station sign pending)
Cliff Rd & Cinamin Ridge
-
"
(
no sign )
Cedar Ridge &Shale
- 0
"
(
no sign )
Blackhawk & Hwy 30
- 3
"
(
3 in SW corner)
Diffley & Thomas Lake
- 2
to
(
1,in NW , 1 in NE corner )
Diffley & Pilot Knob
- 5
"
(
2 in NW, 3 in NE corner )
Deerrood & Pilot Knob
= 3
"
(
1 in NB corner , 3 2 in BE corner Should be remo�
Diffley & Lexington
- 7
"
(
1 in NE corner , 6 in SE corner )
Diffley & Trenton
- 4
".
(
1. in SE corner, on Right/a/way & 3 signs in SW co:
Wescott & Lexington
- 2
"
(
2 -in NW corner )
Yankee Doodle * Lex.
- 5
It
(
1 NW, 1 Sw, 3 SE & 1 in NE corner )
Yankee Doodle &Pilot Knob- 0 " ( 2 pylon signs , Hotel and Super America )
Yankee Doodle & Hwy 13 - 0 "
Four Oaks &'Hwy 13 - 1 " ( ! sign NE corner)
Lone Oak & Hwy 13 - 0 "
Lone Oak &Pilot Knob - 1 " ( Blackhawk Glen - No permit )
Lone Oak & Lexington - 3 " ( 2 in SE , 1 in NE corner )
Summary
1 intersection, 7 signs
2 " 5 "
1 It 4 "
6 It 3 u .
7 " 2 n
8
It 1 "
6 it o "
31 intersections 61 signs
MEMO TO: CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR PETERSON
Fes,; FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 4, 1986
SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY -OWNED/
STANDARDIZED TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
In official action that was taken by the City Council at their
April 1, 1986, meeting, a concept was given consideration whereby
the City would construct and install uniform, temporary advertising
signs throughout approved locations within the City. These signs
would be designed to accommodate several identification signs that
would meet a specific specification and design standard. Please
make reference to the example that was prepared by City Council -
member Ellison and is attached for your reference.
The City Council is concerned about the number of temporary C '
advertising signs that are located at busy intersections throughout
the community. I would like you to give consideration to this new •
concept that was proposed by the City Council and determine the
feasibility of the project. Please take into consideration the
following:
1.
Locations: It would be necessary to determine the loca-
tions that are suitable for installing a City -owned stan-
dardized sign.
2.
Size: Please prepare a set of specifications that would
standardize the sign and each reader board/identification
sign.
3.
Cost: Please .estimate the cost for construction and
installation of these signs. Also determine which each
of the individual reader board/identifications would cost
to construct and, further, what. -is fair in terms of
rental charges by the City.
4.
Priority: Please determine a method in which the reader
board/identification signs would be rented considering
•
priority of space on the City sign and, further, the
duration of time that those identification signs would be
allowed.
5.
Number of Signs: Please determine how many signs could
be placed on one of the overall signs and, further,
whether more than one size of sign should be given
consideration. Please see #2 above.
6.
Locations: Currently, a development is allowed two (2)
temporary advertising signs in addition to any signs that
are allowed on the subject development parcel. It would
be necessary to determine the procedure for allowing a
location and consideration for the two additional signs a
developer might request.
7.
Other Criteria: Please give consideration to any other
criteria that might be appropriate in considering this
project.
/70
It appears that the City Council would like to proceed with this
concept for controlling and providing a beautification to temporary
> advertising signs throughout the community. It would be necessary
=� to provide some type of transition such as, requiring developers
to remove their temporary advertising signs and possibly provide 'a
free or reduced rent for the first year to off -set expenses that
they have incurred in the construction of their temporary adver-
tising sign.
Again,please give this priority consideration. If you need
further assistance due to your departmental schedule, please con-
tact my office and I will provide some administrative assistance
either through our new intern or one of my Administrative Assis-
tants.
Gv
• City\v Administrator
cc: Honorable Mayor & City Councilmembers
TLH/kf
•
SA F/A ROAKS .
�I
H L L i O P F E R S
Hymn hom�s,�n C1omeS
r7�)-,
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR, TOM HEDGES
CHIEF BUILDING
OFFICIAL, DALE PETERSON
' FROM: ELMER A BORGSCHATZ
DATE: JUNE 12, 1986
BE: CITY COUNCILPROPOSAL TO CONSIDER CITY ONNED/STAND
TEMPORARYYADVERTISING SIGNS
ARDIZED
In reference to memo dated A
that may be helpful to stud Aril 4, 1986 we
a problem re have gathered some information
the co to a readerboard
which could be considered
impressed by the concept � board identification. been
eliminate
to when we refer to the ' however there may be some I have been very much
seven points set forth in Pitfalls as we will allude
C 1• LOCATIONS - Your letter.
The I would estimate that six reader boards are
present activity in the City. The developments areas of the Citneeded to cover
the use of ri htY' however it may be difficult 0-leare spread into
g of -ways would not be to lease six most
• advisable. Prime spots as
2. SIZE - The attached sign detail b
Eagan meets the recommendation Y a reputable
cost estimate of the advertising company in
also attached seems high Council, however the all -steel v �- steel sign
3. COSTS - In accordance with estimates
sign with steel we have for
include reflect Posts, removable (12" x 72„ adv- all steel constructed
The land ized panels would cost Panels) which
use cost is estimated at approximately would
annually may be low. $600 per unit. y maintenance
per unit.
$100 maintenance cost
Assuming a ten-year life expectancy of the all -
calculations indicate the projected income
service; steel sign, the following
necessary to provide the
To meet the annual costs
• 3 0 $1,143, depreciation f ich would be change of script;
Of site - $600 and $5�5� interest of $525, lease
$2,893• A monta $100 for maintenance for a total of
necessary, y rental fee of $33 per
panel would be
4.
5.
6.
PRIORITY _ It
is suggested that the reader board
applicants who have shown the greatest
Processed in the preceding be leased to the
g six mo
nths. activity in number of
NUMBER units
OF SIGNS - We believe that signs should be
values. At the moment
Signs in strategic' it would seem difficult to uniform for aesthetic
allow an six
for 4g locations within the Cit locate more
users and not the
y• Six signs filled hwould
outlay of approximately $36,000 looks the gacceptance b y, the
large. Y the industry,
LOCATION our contention that
� - It is
spots. I believe Council and mama location could
temporary advertisin gement could be be found for six good
Part of the Problem.g'needs, hopef� the reader abetter judge of the
.,;� board would eliminate
7. OTHER CRITERIA - Space on the reader board on an annual basis, if renewals
are wanted, arrangements and fees should be made 30 days before
expiration. Vacancies_ do not destroy the effect of the board.
EB/js
_•
Q?O
June 6, 1986
Mr. Elmer Borgschatz
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Twin post directional signs
Dear Elmer:
To furnish and install a 16' tall twin post structure with
eight double faced directional panels as shown on Drawing
fight -193, our price to you is $4,737.00• For optional
reflective copy, add $512.00.
The following is a cost breakdown for your review:
Installed Total
Furnished �—
700.00
1300.00 2000.00
Poles
Reflective 281,00
90.00 381.00
12" x 72" D/F panels
Non -x 72it DIFevF Panels 227.00
90.00 317.00
12" x 7 "
Sincerely,
LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC.
Mike Gifford
MG:ds
N O,.N IO AN iOl" DI JO
_ m3�n enuadsa3d
3� •YC ]UwM
Be,l OS OMV SNAn .11ry
bo
13my'1YniY - - �%+a0
.Q31M01'Jl1f 111
1
ooh 7;
0
goOda oa
L1l�J�l�1V� UU�U� �l
cl Ro V
�V II McMDCSaa4LTC C�
maln eat
I
07
c
.uYi
{
�fr
o
r
r j ldlU
N O,.N IO AN iOl" DI JO
_ m3�n enuadsa3d
3� •YC ]UwM
Be,l OS OMV SNAn .11ry
bo
13my'1YniY - - �%+a0
.Q31M01'Jl1f 111
1
ooh 7;
0
goOda oa
L1l�J�l�1V� UU�U� �l
cl Ro V
�V II McMDCSaa4LTC C�
maln eat
I
M12MES OF THE DEVELOPERS TASK FORCE MEETING
Eagan,, Minnesota
November 12, 1986
A meeting of the Developers Task Force was convened by City
Administrator Hedges at 4:10 p.m. on November 12, 1986, in the conference
rooms of the Municipal Center, Building. Present were Mark Johnson, Mark
Johnson Construction; Pat Hoffman, Advance Developers; Lori Trygg, Advisory
Planning Commission representative; Rod Hardy, Sienna Corporation; Dale
Peterson, Chief Building Inspector; Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works;
Dale Runkle, City Planner; Jon Hohenstein, Administrative Assistant and Tom
Hedges, City Administrator.
An amendment to the minutes of the September 24, 1.986, Developers
Task Force meeting was reviewed and found acceptable as recommended.Minutes
of the October 8, 1986, Developers Task Force meeting were also reviewed. In
• a motion by Trygg, seconded by Hoffman, all members voting in favor, the
minutes were approved as presented..
TEMPORARY ADVERTISING SIGNS
Dale Peterson, Chief Building Inspector, responded to direction that
was given at the October 8, Developers Task Force meeting, suggesting that
major intersections that could include some type of directional sign are
Diffley and Pilot Knob Road, Diffley and Lexington, Yankee Doodle and
Lexington, Lone Oak and Lexington, Cliff and Dodd Road and Cliff and Pilot
Knob Road. He also stated that the signs would be all wood, 12 feet in
height, 7 feet wide and consisting of eight (8) double faced panels that are
approximately six feet long. Chief Building Inspector Peterson stated that
the initial cost would be $1,500 installed by a City crew. He further
indicated that the annual cost analysis would be approximately $980 for each
reader board considering the average land lease for the sign of $600, annual
depreciation of $300 and an annual maintenance totaling $80. According to
• Chief Building Inspector Peterson, the panels could lease for approximately
$120 per year to cover all expenses.
Pat Hoffman expressed his objection to the proposed reader board/
directional signs stating that developers could no longer advertise housing
projects, which is essential to persons who are looking for. housing
developments while driving through Eagan. He stated that the use of panels
are too restrictive and only act as directional and not advertising signs.
Mark Johnson stated that the newspapers provide more information and possibly
the reader board is better suited as a directional sign. Pat Hoffman
suggested that the sign ordinance be tightened up as necessary to provide
better controls at major intersections and possibly limit the number of
temporary advertising signs, as opposed to the City being in the business of
leasing signs that would only satisfy directional purposes.
After further discussion regarding the proposed panels, it was
determined by the Developers Task Force that the amount of space would only
provide a name recognition and direction and it was further pointed out that
if directional signs are to be used at major intersections it is then
necessary to continue the signage so the motorists can find the development
project. The Developers Task Force also concluded that the type of
information that is contained on each sign is important and should provide
some minimum data about the housing project and that the sign should be
7'7
limited in size.
The Developers Task Force continued their discussion, suggesting
that temporary advertising signs are necessary due to the growth orientation
of the community. Rod Hardy suggested that a minimum square footage and
number of signs be allowed for each intersection. This should minimize the
negative aesthetic impact at certain locations within the community. It was
suggested by Task Force members that minimum sign size be 4' x 4' and the
number of signs be limited to four per intersection, with no more than two per
quadrant. It was also suggested that a sign depth or width be limited to one
foot so that a temporary advertising sign could not include four sides. One
additional criteria discussed was that all temporary advertising signs be
placed on private property and cannot obstruct any sight lines for the
motorist.
After further discussion as to the number of signs per quadrant and
their sizes, a motion was introduced by Rod Hardy, seconded by Mark Johnson,
with all members voting in favor, to recommend to the City Council a
directional advertising sign with a square footage not to exceed 20 square
feet and 4' x 5' in dimension, including any protrusion of the sign.
Furthermore, that the sign must be located on private property, cannot
obstruct any sight lines and there will be no more than four signs per
intersection with a restriction of two per quadrant and further, that the sign
not be allowed to exceed a seven foot elevation above grade.
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY REQOIREMENTS
Director of Public Works Colbert presented a street matrix that
identifies minimum street requirements for the City of Eagan. He stated that
the matrix identifies all road types including local access, collectors and
arterials and describes specifications including width, traffic lanes, parking
lanes, grade design, street minimum curb centerline radius, design load,
walkways, centerline entrance spacing and a column for average daily trips.
Following the Director of Public Works' presentation, there was a discussion
regarding the reduction of the average daily trips from 500 to 200 for a low
density project that might justify a reduction in the street width from 28
feet to 24 feet in width. There was also a discussion regarding the
requirements and regulations for private street construction and it was
determined by the Developers Task Force that these regulations may be
different from a public street. Director of Public Works Colbert stated that
his proposed requirements are in draft form and would like to continue
evaluation of the matrix and present the same for consideration at the next
meeting.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting was set for December 11, 1986,'at'4:00 p.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:,50 p.m.
TLH
Dated
Chairperson
Secretary
Agenda Information Memo,
December 2, 19'86, City Council Meeting
Page Fourteen
C. PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS
CONTRACT 83-K, FINAL ACCEPTANCE (BRITTANY 6TH ADDITION)
1. Contract 83-D, Final Acceptance (Brittany 6th Addition -
Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request from the
developer along with the recommendation from a consultant
engineer that all streets and utilities installed privately by
the develoepr within the Brittany 6th Addition under Contract 83-
K conformed to City approved Plans and Specifications and are in
order for formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance by the
City. All final inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department with a
recommendation for favorable Council action to this request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 83-K
(Brittany 6th Addition - Streets and Utilities) for final
acceptance and perpetual maintenance,.
CONTRACT 84-T,, FINAL ACCEPTANCE (BRITTANY 7TH ADDITION)
2. Contract 84-T, Final Acceptance (Brittany 7th Addition -
Streets and Utilities) --We have received a request for final
acceptance from the developer along with a certification from our
® consultant engineer that all public improvements installed
privately by the developer conform with the City approved Plans
and Specifications. All final inspections have been performed by
representatives of the Public Works Department and it is being
forwarded :to the Council the recommendation for favorable
action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve, Contract 84-T,
(Brittany 7th Addition - Streets and Utilities) for final
acceptance and perpetual maintenance.
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1986
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Enclosed on page 00.2. is a copy of the September monthly report
for the Eagan Volunteer Fire Department.
HRA UPDATE
Enclosed on pages 90 through is a copy of a status report
for Dakota County regarding assisted housing and community develop-
ment.
FINANCIAL REPORTING ACHIEVEMENT AWARD
The City has received notification from the. Government Finance
Officers Association that our Director of Finance has again received
the award of Financial Reporting Achievement which is the highest
recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting.
The City Administrator will issue a press release to our local
newspapers regarding this achievement.
UPDATE ON I -35E DIFFLEY CENTER PROPOSAL
The Advisory Planning Commission held a three (3) hour hearing
last evening in consideration of the I -35E Diffley Center, proposed
rezoning and preliminary plat. After approximately one hour
• and twenty minutes of presentation by the developers and an hour
and a half of comments by residents and discussion by the Advisory
Planning Commission, the proposed applications were continued
for sixty (60) days. This item will again be discussed by the
Advisory Planning Commission at their January 27, 1987 meeting.
There were five (5) areas of study that the Advisory Planning
Commission directed the City staff to research. Those items
are as follows: 1) a thorough police and fire review, similar
to the race track, 2) a detailed traffic analysis and review
of infrastructure by the Director of Public Works and an indepen-
dent traffic engineer, selected by the City, 3) data that states
the national average for commercial square footage per person
in communities of Eagan's population, 4) what is the proposed
tax impact on the community and 5) study alternate zoning
tradeoffs throughout the community. This report will be prepared.
and distributed as a part of the APC packet information for the
January meeting.
go
MLC UPDATE'
Enclosed without page number is a copy of the MLC Update for
November/December.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
V
•
•
EAGAN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT
FOR MONTH OF September, 1986
WORK PERFORMED
TYPE MAN HOURS
Fire/Rescue .542
Training 644'
Truck & Equipment Maintenance 141
Station Maintenance 141
Fire Prevention 50
Administrative 306
TOTAL 1,824
MANPOWER
STATION #]
STATION #2..
STATION #
.Available
Nights
9
12
9
Available
Days .
6
5
3
Available
Days and Nights
3
4
3
Available
Rotating
3
1
2
On Leave
0
1
0
Rookies
0
0
. 0 %' '
TOTAL
21
23
17
FIRE/RESCUE
TYPE
NUMBER
$ LOSS
Structure
13
22,680
Grass
0
0
Vehicle
6
10250
False
16
Medical
6
Other
3
TOTAL
44
$ 23,930
LARGE DOLLAR LOSSES
DATE
NAME LOCATION
OCCUPANCY
$ LOSS
9/10/86
4615 Nicols
Road
House
2,000
9/21/86
1682 Walnut
Lane
House
20,000
R. DAKOTA
1
ON
Yeti
ria 10�
� iala:nia
COUNTY
DAKOTA COUNTY
HOUSING &
REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
2496- 145th STREET WEST
ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068
612-423-4800
Serving People and Communities
MEMORANDUM
TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred
Joy, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department
FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director
SUBJECT: NEW STATUS REPORT FORMAT
DATE: November 13, 1986
We have revised our Monthly Status Report format. Each city will now receive a
report for their community and a county -wide report. If you would like to also
receive reports on other Dakota County communities, please call Lori Zierden of
our staff.
We hope this new format is easier to follow and provides you with the infor-
mation you need to assess assisted housing and community development activity in
your area.
�- S3
"CAI Fnllhl noon9TII11IT1 C110InVCG"
ASSISTED HOUSING
Status Report for Dakota County**
October, 1986
Amount
of
Elderly Family Total +/-
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
**Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing,
Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the
Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community
Development programs.
Section 8 Existing - Certificates
440
1,055
1,495
0
Section 8 Existing - Vouchers
0
1
1
+1
Moderate Rehab
4
21
25
0
Section 8 New Construction
247
300
547
0
Low Rent Housing
380
182
562
0
235 Home
0
41
41
0
236 Rental
0
526
526
0
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING
071
2,126
3,197
—+I
Amount
t
of
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Elderly
Family
Commercial
Total
Increase
MHFA Home Improvement Loan
31
131
0
162
1
MHFA Home Rehab Loan
63
77
0
140
5
'
MHFA Home Energy Loan
10
77
0
87
0
Rental Rehab
38
47
0
85
42
CDBG Rehab Loan
87
127
0
214
0
CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home
1
15
0
16
14
MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan
0
8
0
8
0
312 Loan Residential
4
15
0
19
1
312 Loan Commercial & Mixed Use
N/A
N/A
3
3
1
Weatherization
309
1,160
0
1,469
18
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
543
X57
3T,-2-0-3
82
* + = Increase/- = Decrease
**Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing,
Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the
Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community
Development programs.
.1.
Status Report for the City of Eagan
October, 1986
ASSISTED HOUSING
Elderly
Family
Total
Section 8 Existing - Certificates
30
161
191
Section 8 New Construction
0
33
33
Low Rent Housing
0
17
17
236 Rental
0
144
144
TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING
30
355
385
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MHFA Home Improvement Loan
MHFA Home Rehab Loan
MHFA Home Energy Loan
CDBG Rehab Loan
Weatherization
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
* + = Increase/- = Decrease.
Elderly
0
3
1
5
-0
gS
Family
7
3
7
3
57
777
Total
7
6
8
4
62
Lh
Amount
of
LLI!
0
0
0
0
0
Amount
of
Increase
0
0
0-
1
T
W
;1