The URL can be used to link to this page

12/16/1986 - City Council RegularADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN;, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 16-, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Squad Car Bids Item 2. DNR Request for Special Hunt Item 3. Work Plan/January 27, 1987, MASAC Meeting Item 4. Proposal. for Office Paper Recycling Services DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY There are no items at this time to be covered by City Attorney. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Squad Car Bids --The City has received the Hennepin County bid for the purchase of police patrol cars at $11,421 per vehicle. As a part of the 1987 budget., approval was given to purchase eight (8) vehicles at a total cost of.$91,543. DID, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To authorize. an order for the Police squad cars through the Hennepin County purchasing, program from Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet for eight (8) vehicles at $11,421 per vehicle. Item 2. . DNR Request for Special Hunt --Mr. Jon Parker, Area Wildlife Manager for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has requested time on the agenda to discuss a proposed special hunt from December 27 through December 31, 1986. Please refer to the attached letter found on page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special hunt designated for December 27 through December 31, 1986, to accommodate hunters using muzzle -loading rifles (black powder) and/or bow and arrow. •Item 3. Work Plan/January 27, 1987, MASAC Meeting --The 'City of Eagan has received a request from MASAC Chairman Walter Rockenstein to make a presentation regarding its position on the Eagan -Mendota Heights departure corridor at the MASAC meeting on January 27, 1987. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has prepared an outline relating to the City of Eagan's position relative to the departure corridor which is enclosed on pages /'7S through /76 for your review. It is important that the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights work closely together in an effort to demonstrate unanimity as it relates to the departure corridor. If the City Council is in agreement with the outline as presented, the staff will prepare the information and graphics for a presentation on January 27. The City Administrator is . planning to attend that meeting and participate in the presentation along with Administrative Assistant Hohenstein. Members of the City Council may wish to mark their calendars and be in attendance for that meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the City Administrator regarding the outline and work program to prepare the presentation before MASAC at their January 27 meeting regarding the Eagan/Mendota Heights departure corridor. qoZ Item 4,. Proposal for Office Paper Recycling Services --As a part of the solid waste management objectives, the City has prepared a request for proposal to seek a company that would provide office paper recycling services for the City of Eagan. The only bidder is Rohn Industries which is willing to collect the paper at no cost or payment to the City of Eagan. The City's other choice is to continue having the paper collected through refuse hauling at a cost of $70 per ton once it is landfilled. It has been the opinion of the City Administrator and Administrative Assistant Hohenstein that the City set an example for community recycling and when considered that 308 of the city's waste is recoverable office paper and can be recycled, this recycling service, will demonstrate positive leadership and an example on the part -of local government. Enclosed on page/717 is a memo describing the RFP process and recommendation to contract with Rohn Industries with the under- standing that staff' will continue to negotiate modification of the proposal realizing there is no payment and that the duration of • time be for a one-year contract. If any member of the City Council would like to review the RFP, a copy will be provided at your request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the proposal for office paper recycling services as presented by Rohn Industries. City Adminis rator • • ltDEPARTMENT n^SnT2ATE OF OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO. 44 5- 93 93 FILE NO. Jon Parker Area Wildlife Manager 223 Holmes St Shakopee, MN 55379 Toi(iaHQ1H Council, c/o City Administrator Dear Council Members: December 12,1986 .This is to confirm our request to City staff that we be allowed to meet with Whe City Council at your next regularly -scheduled meeting. Due to recent controversy concerning management of the deer herd in the Minnesota valley, the Commissioner of Natural Resources is considering requesting your approval of a second special hunt on the same lands and under.the same conditions as the hunt which we conducted on November 8 and 9 and 15 and 16. The hunt would be done•by selected }n:nters using muzzle -loading rifles (black powder) and/or bow and arrow. Hunter density and orientation would be the same as before. The proposed dates at present are December 27 through 31, 1986. There may be some changes in the proposal before the meeting, so I will have to make specific details available at the meeting. I appologize for the extremely short notice of this request. We could not foresee the need for this request and we hope you will understand the Department's need to make these types of decisions quickly to meet legal deadlines for season frameworks. '• ;qncerely, n M. Parker cc: Roger Johnson Craig Cox AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER N Bti ,'oJ4t, MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION FOR JANUARY 27, 1987 MASAC MEETING The City of Eagan has received a request that it make presentation regarding its position on the Eagan -Mendota Heights Departure Corridor at the MASAC meeting on January 27, 1987. MASAC Chairman Walter Rockenstein has been following our discussions with the MAC and FAA. He believes that MASAC, as a party to the original corridor agreements, should hear presentations from all concerned parties and take a position in the issue. The City has often asserted that it is willing to air this issue in the appropriate forum. In this circumstance, Mr. Rockenstein appears willing to - provide such an opportunity, if the City considers this an appropriate forum. Each city and agency will be given fifteen to twenty minutes to make its case. I would anticipate that those presenting would be the Cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights, the FAA and MAC. Mr. Rockenstein may make presentation on ® , behalf of the City of Minneapolis if he sees our position in conflict with Minneapolis' interests. I intend to approach Chauncy Case of the Metropolitan Council to determine whether that agency would be willing to address the issue from the perspective of its regional land planning implications. If the City wishes to use this opportunity to represent its interests in this regard', 1 would propose the following work plan. Week 6-3 Meetings with John Voss and Dale Runkle to define information and graphic needs. Week 5 Request additional information from MAC. Week 5-2 Meetings with Mendota Heights, Metropolitan Council and Rockenstein to address positions and common interests. Week 4 Draft Position Statement Week 2 Meeting with Mendota Heights, Metropolitan Council, MAC, FAA, and Rockenstein to review HNTB analysis of corridor use impacts. Week 1 Final Presentation Preparation. In addition, I would suggest the basic position outlined below. I. Land Use and Evolution of the Corridor A. Standard procedures have changed over time. The City requested a left turn procedure as an accomodation for the impact of the Preferential Runway System. Various agencies and the City agreed to a 105 degree standard as the best means of using the corridor. B. The left turn departure track modification became the standard on which the Metropolitan Council and the Cities based their planning. C. This accomodation is necessary to offset the impacts of Prefernetial Runway System concentrations of traffic. II: Recent Developments A. Operations have flown beyond the accepted parameters on both sides of the corridor. B. The FAA has unilaterally altered departure procedures without regard for City and Metropolitan land planning. C. Evidence does not support the need for such a change, nor does it reveal that any official action requested it. III. Logical Approach to Corridor Procedures'- Two issues: A. First, when diverging separation is not necessary, it is obvious that operations should be directed to the middle of the corridor at or about 105 degrees. B. Second, when it is necessary to diverge, impacts of all operations should be considered. Corridor use should be optimized by placing the worst of the impacts, as shown by the Integrated Noise Model contours, equidistant from the residentialneighborhoods on either side. C. If there were a noise compatible corridor in Minneapolis, an effort would be made to place the worst of its impacts near its middle. Eagan and Mendota Heights have such a corridor and its use should be optimized but not abused. IV. Summary ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approval or direction on the use of this forum to address the corridor and, if appropriate, approval or direction i• on the proposed Action Plan and Position Outline. I can be available for the City Council Meeting on Tuesday at or about 9:00 pm and after to respond to questions on this item. Adfinistrative Assistant MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING SERVICES AS I indicated in our earlier conversation, Rohn Industries is the sole bidder to provide office paper recycling services to the City of Eagan. Due to the fact that Rohn Industries lacks an established route in the Dakota County area, they have proposed to implement an office paper recycling program including all containers and initial training and they will pick up our office paper at no charge. As you are aware, we had expected to be able to receive payment for our recycled office paper and, in this regard, the proposal is less than we expected. However, Dakota County is paying $50 per collection for the same company to take their office paper. This proposal is much better than that. We had hoped to receive a proposal from Pioneer Paper Stock, the other major office paper recycler in the Twin Cities. Unfortunately, Pioneer declined to make a proposal because they could not meet certain specifications within the proposal. I would request Council action to accept or not accept the Rohn Industries' proposal for recycling services. Although we are not receiving payment under the proposal for our office paper, it is more cost effective to have it recycled at no cost than to pay up to $70 per ton to have it landfilled. Staff estimates indicate that anywhere from 1/4 to 1/3 of the City's waste stream is recoverable office paper. Therefore, even with no direct return, the waste disposal savings would be substantial. It may be appropriate, however, for the City Council to consider directing staff to negotiate a modification of the proposal. The RFP had specified a two-year contract to assure stability for the vendor. In light of the fact that no payment is being made to the City, it might be appropriate to negotiate a one-year contract at the same rate and use one year of operations to fine tune and modify a request for 1988. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A copy of the RFP is attached to this memo for consideration by the Council if that is appropriate. A�n�istrative Assistant Attachment JH/kf J n t q s/ AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL DECEMBER 16, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT BEAD BUSINESS A. Public Works Department P,1 1. Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization, Identification of Management Issues �.1 2. Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Road Grader) p�r3. Project 455, Consider Easement Condemnation Award (Deerwood r. I Drive -Floyd Bryant) S4. Project 452, Consider Claim for Pond Pumping (Burow Pond/Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition) B. Parks and Recreation Department p.lk 1. Acquisition of Waldron Property for Expansion of Blackhawk Park 1 F.132. Establish the 1987 Parks Development Priority List IV. 16:55 - CONSENT AGENDA P.1(1A. Contractor Licenses p. 17B. Personnel Items 9C. Renewal - 1987 Off -Sale Liquor License, Big Top Wines & Spirits P.\9 D. Renewal - 1987 On -Sale Liquor License, Dougherty's �.�qE. Amusement Device License, Broadway Pizza (Cedar Cliff Shopping Center) F p,;t.OF. Approve Amendment to Development Contract Schedules (Royal Oak 1 Circle 1st & 2nd Addition) ZOG. Project 486, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (E -Z Air Park - PStorm Sewer) H. Project 490, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Woodgate Lane -Street Lights) Z$1. Speed Limit Designations/MnDOT Speed Study Request ?IpT. Project 491, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagan Hills Farms Addition) 0,16K. Project 492, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lone Oak i 2nd Addition/O'Neill Drive - Streets and Utilities) p ZL,L. Vacation of Utility and Ponding Easements, Receive Petition/Order L Public Hearing (Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition) R 1� M. Approve Revised Ambulance Contract, Abolish Local Government Subsidy V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS .!a A. Public Hearing for Project 466, Pilot Knob Road Upgrading I p 3 3B. Public Hearing for Project 479, Lexington/North.view Park (Trunk 1 Storm Sewer) A. Public Improvement Contracts 1. Change Order 112, Contract 86-1, 1986 Parks Construction Project UU (Central Landscaping) Contract 86-14, Approve Change Order 11 1 and 2 (Greensboro Addition) B. Private Improvement Contracts r.i3, 1. Contract 85-J, Final Acceptance (Haeg Addition) r.�232. Contract 86-V, Final Acceptance (Sunset 6th Addition) 3� C. Consider Amendment to City Code, Chapter 6, Section 6.42 to Change Requirements for Licensing Building Contractors 10 D. Thomas Lake Housing Association Supplemental Regulatory Agreement I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT C. Public Hearing for Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition/ P.tO Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS (o (a A. Proposed Adoption of 1987 General & Utility Fund Budget VII. NEW BUSINESS �, 73 A. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace) To Split a Duplex on Lot 3, Block 4, Rahn 'Ridge Located East of Nicola Road Abutting Vienna Lane, Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 31 f, -75'B. 1987 Liquor License, Eagandale Club C. Preliminary Plat (Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation) for d P ' Lone Oak 2nd Addition, Consisting of a Flight Simulator Training Facility Located on Approximately 82 Acres on Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition, South, of O'Neill Drive & East of Lone Oak Parkway in the NW 1/4 of Sec 1 9 s D. Preliminary Plat (William Hutner)for Pinecrest Addition Consisting of 17 Single Family.Lots and a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R- 1 (Single Family) for 7 Acres & a Variance for a cul-de-sac in Excess of 500' Located South of Crestridge Lane and West of Kolstad Road, Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 15 �'lls E. Preliminary Plat (Opus Corporation) for Eagandale Industrial Center No.8, for Replatting Lots. 13, 14, 16, 17 and a Part of 18, Block 5, Into 4 Newly Created Lots Located North of Lone Oak Road and West i of I -35E, SE 1/4 of Section 3 12 S F. Resolution for Fiscal Year 1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding Application 7.131 G. Consider Final Plat Approval, Lexington Hills Addition 10.133 H. Consider Final Plat Approval, Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Public Improvement Contracts 1. Change Order 112, Contract 86-1, 1986 Parks Construction Project UU (Central Landscaping) Contract 86-14, Approve Change Order 11 1 and 2 (Greensboro Addition) B. Private Improvement Contracts r.i3, 1. Contract 85-J, Final Acceptance (Haeg Addition) r.�232. Contract 86-V, Final Acceptance (Sunset 6th Addition) 3� C. Consider Amendment to City Code, Chapter 6, Section 6.42 to Change Requirements for Licensing Building Contractors 10 D. Thomas Lake Housing Association Supplemental Regulatory Agreement I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COONCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 11, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA fiNFORMATION aDnPT AGENDALAPPRC After approval .is given to the December 16, 1986 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the November 24 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration:. A. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Public Works Department --The Gun Club Lake WMO has been proceding with the preparation of the required watershed management plan in anticipation of scheduling a public meeting to be held on March , 1987, to present to the public a draft plan and solicit their input regarding specific management issues that should be addressed through the completion of this plan preparation process. The WMO Board of Directors would like to identify as many manage- ment issues as possible prior to this public meeting in order to have something of substance to generate discussion and additional input. Subsequently, as one of Eagan's official representatives on this WMO Board, the Director of Public Works would like to receive any input that the Council may have regarding specific issues • of concern to be addressed. An example would be the issue already identified collectively by the Board regarding groundwater contamination and potential relationships to the Pine Bend Land- fill and the discovered abandoned disposal -site on the University of Minnesota property in Rosemount. Any other similar issues that the Council may be aware of should be provided to the Director of Public Works so that it can be addressed by the WMO Board in its preparation of the water management plan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Identify any management issues of concern to be addressed by the Gun Club Lake Watershed Managment Organization. Item 2. Public Works Department --On 10:00 A.M. on Wednesday, December '10, formal bids were received for the acquisition of a motor .patrol road grader with snow plow attachments. This piece of equipment was to replace the 1981 John Deere roadgrader thatwas sold back to the manufacturer in July of 1986, under the guaranteed repurchase program. The $99,000 revenue from this repurchase was taken into consideration in establishing the 1987 bu get of $118,000 to replace this road grader. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received. The following is an expl nation of each line item:, Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two 1) The extent of any and all deviations from the base bid specifi- cations are being reviewed by staff to determine the accepti- bility with a final report and recommendation being provided at the Council meeting on December 16. 2) This is the base purchase price of the machine after all major discounts had been applied. 3) This is what the City would receive for our existing 1965 Wabco road grader. 4) This is what the immediate cash outlay requirement would be for the City in the purchase of any machine. 5) This is the price that the City would be guaranteed in receiv- ing for the piece of equipment at the end of five years. This protects the City in case the road grader would turn out to be a "lemon." You will note that the two other dealers would not guarantee a repurchase price. 6) This is the value that has been estimated by staff as to what the machine "might" be worth at the end of five years for sale on the open market. 7) This bid item guarantees that the City will spend no more than the quoted amount for maintenance repair during the first five years or 6,000 hours of operations. One bidder would not bid a guaranteed maintenance repair cost to the City. • 7a) Staff estimated what the anticipated maintenance repair costs might be during the five year period based on past experience. 8) Based on the preventative and scheduled maintenance for the piece of equipment, this is the cost anticipated to be incurred by the City. These figures should be used for comparative analysis between pieces of equipment only. The lower the price, the less scheduled and preventative maintenance required. 9) Self explanatory. The length of delay for the used in stock caterpiller is necessary to outfit it with the City's required snow plow equipment. 10) This reflects what the costs would be to the City at the end of five years if the piece of equipment were to be resold, similar to a past road grader. This is an indication of what the true cost to the City would be for the purchase of any specific make of road grader.. lie Ll Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three Additional information will be •provided by staffto help the Council evaluate the bids at the Council meeting of December 16. _ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and authorize the purchase of the appropriate make of road grader. 3 ROAD GRADER BID COMPARISONS VEH. #112 BID OPENING 10:30 A.M., DECEMBER 10, 1986 BOERCHERT CARLSON "CHAMPION 730-A" "JOHN DEERE 770B -H - (New) (New) 1) Met Specifications No 2) Base Bid (+) $82,777.00 3) Trade In (-) 3,000.00 4) "Net Purchase" Bid 79,777.00 Resale Value I 80,000.00 , 5) _ 5 Yr. Guar. ' Buy Back (-) No Bid 6) - Staff Est. 2,904.00 2,904.00 (35% of X12) (-) 29,000.00 • Maint. Repair Costs $47,257.00 ' 7) - 5 Yr. Guar. Maximum (+) No Bid 7a) Staff Estimate 10,000.00 8) - Scheduled Maintenance (+) 3,827.70 9) Deliver Date 60-110 days lo)"Total Cost" Bid $64,604.70 (4-5-6+7+8) ZIEGLER "CATERPILLER 140G" (New) (Used) Noes Yes $87,000.00 I $132,353.00 $123,953.00 2,500.00 15,500.00 15,500.00 84,500.00 116,853.00 I 108,453.00 No Bid I 80,000.00 , 76,000.00 30,450.00 3,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 3,803.60 2,904.00 2,904.00 120-150 days 75-90 days, 30-45 days $61,353.60 $47,257.00 ' $42,857.00 1987.Budget _ $118,000.00 * 1986 dollars with no inflation factor applied Agenda Information Memo December- 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four Item 3. Public Works Department --As a part of the upgrading of Deerwood Drive, it was necessary to acquire permanent and temporary construction easements from several property owners. The City was unable to negotiate the acquisition of the, required easements from Floyd and Victoria Bryant. Subsegently, it had to proceed through the condemnation process. As a result of the condemnation process, the court appointed commissioners determined that the value of the easements and rights-of-way being acquired by the City was $10,066 compared, to the $5,100 appraisal by the City and the $19,142 appraisal by the property owner. The City Attorney has requested Council approval or denial of the commissioner's award determination. If the commissioner's award is not accepted, it will be necessary to appeal this to the district court. It is the City Attorney and Public Works Director's recommendation that the commissioner's award be approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the commissioner's award for easement acquistion under Project 455 (Deerwood Drive) to Floyd and Victoria Bryant. Item 4. Public Works Department --On February 4 and March 4, 1986, public hearings were held to discuss the proposed storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -50 (Burow Pond) located on the eastern edge of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition adjacent to the 20 acre undeveloped tract owned by Federal Land Company on the north side of Cliff Road between Scott Trail and Rahn Road. The public hearing was subsequently continued because an acceptable alignment for the storm sewer outlet could not be determined due to the uncertainty of the development of the ® Federal Land Company property, due to the previous denial of their rezoning request. Subsequently, Burow pond (AP -50) presently does not have an outlet and receives additional runoff form the recent development of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. Due to no existing outlet, the water level in this pond continues to rise to the extent that the current builder of the second office building had to perform temporary pumping to protect flood- ing of the existing parking lot facilities. Enclosed on pages -7-10 is a letter submitted by Developers Construction Incorporated forwarding a bill to the City for the temporary pumping. It is apparent that the need for this temporary pumping will be increasing with the pending completion of the parking lot for the second office building, until the permanent outlet can be completed. The staff would like Council direction as to whether the City should be responsible for continuous temporary pumping of a pond to maintain a safe elevationthat is being impacted by direct :Js Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Five Memo City Council Meeting increased runoff by the recent development of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the claim for temporary pond pumping as submitted by Developers Construction Incorporated relating to Project 452 (Burow Pond/Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition). 17, C=] November 28, 1986 LtE�:�i�'LD iiQV 2 6 i?ES DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1101 Cliff Road Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 612/890-6194 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road PO Box 21199 n Eagan, MN 55121 pa -"r YS -.Z • Dear Tom, I am in receipt of your letter of November 13„ 1986 regarding the office building Lot 1, Block 1, Cedarcliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. On March 4, 1986, I attended the city council meeting and served the attached letter on the mayor and council members. If you were to check the minutes of that meeting it was my understanding that if we had a flooding problem that the City of Eagan was going to pump it or have it pumped at the city's expense. On Saturday, September 20, 1986 and Sunday, September 21, 1986 we had an incredible rainfall and the water from the ponding area rose to within 20 feet of the office building. I called the police department and water works department and was unable to get any assistance. I contacted the Astleford • Company and they immediately took care of the problem, therefore I would like you to authorize payment of $3,105.00 made payable to M. G. Astleford Company, Inc. Tom, with regard to the third paragraph in your letter stating our project is generating the water problem, this is incorrect, if you look at your water shed map it indicates that it is Federal Land and also the surrounding properties are creating the overflow. I would appreciate your help in this matter. c re �yours,� nia. ae'anae resi6Yent' EVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. enclosure cc: M. G. Astleford Jim Durning March 4, 1986 DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1101 Cliff Road Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 612/890-6194 The Honorable Bea Blomquist & Council Members City of Eagan re: Petitioned Storm Sewer Cedar Cliff Park Addition Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council Members, Cedar Cliff Partnership has built one office building at 4590 Scott Trail and is in the process of building our next office building at 4580 Scott Trail. The elevations were set based on city engineering approval and building inspection department. We were advised that if we receive a 100 year rainfall that the parking area would fill up and go onto our parking lot to approximately 2 to 3 feet and would receed through the purposed storm sewer system, if our petition for the installation of a storm sewer system is denied Cedar cliff Partnership will look to the city for any losses and damages as a result of any potential flooding therefore I would appreciate having our petition. sjyecnfidlly yoprs, en/ *I Spaand"e — - AV CUIFFF PARTNERSHIP Durning CLIFF PARTNERSHIP b :na cc: M. G. Astleford Reese Chezik Paul Hauge 11 M.G. Astleford Company, Inc. CONTRACTORS 1200 West Highway 13 890-6300 Burnsvi8e, Minnesota 55337 Developers Construction 1101 E. Cliff Road Burnsville, MN 55337 0045011 INVOICE DATEOctober 2,1986 For equipment and operators furnished at Scott Trail & Cliff Road to pump water: ® Sunday September 21 — and Friday September 26,1986 Foreman w/pickup — deliver pump 6" Diesel Pump w/hoses Operators to service &'supervise pumping Premium Time on Sunday 6" Tractor PTO Driven Pump Tiltbed truck w/driver (to move Pumps) 3 hours @ $50.00 $150.00 25 hours @ 35.00 875.00 25 hours @ 25.00 625.00 111 hours @ 25.00 275.00 19 hours @ 45.00 855.00 5 hours @ 65.00 325.00 $3,105.00 1a 'INANCE CHARGES: 9 INANCE CHARGES ON DEBT BALANCES. 30 DAYS OR OVER ARE COMPUTED AT THE RATE IF 2% PER MONTH, WHICH IS AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 2496. PAYMENT SHOULD BE 1ADE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE TO AVOID FINANCE CHARGES. 0 �5 Council Minutes March 4, 1986 RAHN RIDGE - TRUNK STORM SEWER - PROJECT #465 6100.9 The public hearing concerning Project #465 consisting of trunk storm sewer improvements for Rahn Ridge area was then convened by the Mayor. Mr. Colbert and Mr. Hansen detailed the project, including the proposed improvements to be constructed and the projected assessments. There were no objections to the project, and after discussion, Wachter moved, Egan -seconded the motion. to close the public hearing and approve Project $465 and authorize .the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. All members voted yea. BUROW POND - STORM SEWER OUTLET - PROJECT #452 - The next public hearing convened by Mayor Bea Blomquist consisted of Burow Pona storm sewer outlet improvements for Project #452. A petition had been submitted by Loren Spande, the developer of Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition requesting a feasibility study for the Burow Pona outlet and Mr. Colbert and Mr. Hansen were present to explain the proposed improvements. A public hearing was held. an February 4, 1986 at which time the Council received a. letter of concern from Federal Land Company, owner of property impacted by the various alignment alternates, objecting to timing and location of the outlet. Several alternates were discussed, including the extra depth for additional cost involved under Alternate 2 as opposed to Alternate 1. Because of concerns about going through the park land and the potential tree loss, Alternate C and D were also prepared which would involve greater expense. Mark Battis, attorney with Federal Lana Company, appeared and reviewed two letters of February 4 and February 28, 1986, explaining the objections of Federal Lana Company. He stated it would be premature for Federal Lana property to install the improvements and also the uncertainty of the internal street alignment. He requested the project be deferred. Mr. Colbert stated the concerns by the developer of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition and Loren Spande was present, also expressing such concerns regarding the possibility of greatly increased run-off into Burow Pond. After extensive discussion, Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to close the public hearing and direct the staff to work with the developer to attempt to provide an acceptable alternative, with the understanding that staff will continue to monitor the water level of Burow Pond, noting the possibility that the improvements may be premature at the present time. All councilmembers voted yes. 5 • Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Six Memo City Council Meeting DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS cont'd. B. PARRS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --Parks and Recreation Director Vraa has negotiated a purchase price for the Waldron property which adjoins Blackhawk Lake on the northeast side. This property will provide shoreline and trail access for Blackhawk Park. For additional information and the specifics on the purchase price and land acquisition, refer to the enclosed memo found on page /71_�, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or disapprove the acquisition of the Waldron property for the expansion of Blackhawk Park as presented. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY AD3IINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1986 RE: ACQUISITION - KATHY WALDRON PARCEL - BLACKHAWK PARK At the November Council meeting, the City Council approved Staff to proceed with negotiations with Ms. Waldron for the parcel on the north side. of Blackhawk Lake. Staff has recently met with Kathy Waldron to discuss this acquisition. At the time of the discussion with the owner, it was disclosed t that in addition to the $8,719.00 in remaining assessments on the parcel, the parcel was also subjected to approximately $10,890.00 of unpaid taxes and assessments for years previous to 1986. The 1986 taxes and assessments of $2,292.00 remains outstanding. City Staff has had several conversations regarding the value of this particular parcel. However, since the City is without benefit of a legal survey, we have only been able to determine the size of the parcel calculations based on preliminary figures. These calculations now estimate, that while the parcel may have at one time been as large as eight (8) acres, due to an increase in the ordinary high water elevation to 790.3, the size of the parcel is now 4.5 acres. Based on this, Department Staff is recommending an offer price of $46,500.00. The Seller would be responsible for paying, all taxes and remaining assessments on the parcel. Further, that the seller be responsible for ® providing for a registered property abstract. The current owner is requesting a closing date of December 30, 1986, in order to minimize impact to her as a result of recent changes in the federal tax code affecting capital gains. FOR COUNCIL ACTION To approve/disapprove of the offer of $46,500.00 for the Kathleen Waldron Parcel. KV/bls /v Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Seven Memo City Council Meeting Item 2. Parks and Recreation Department --The Advisiory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the 1987 Parks Development Program and has categorized all construction priorities for the parks. For a copy of the 1987 Parks Development Priorities refer to pages through The Director of Parks and Recreation, n behalf of the Advisory Commission, is requesting action by the City Council so that design and development can begin on those parks as listed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To establish the 1987 Parks Development Priority List as modified or recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN VRAA DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 PARKS DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES In order that preparatory work, in anticipation of 1987 parks development program can begin, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the parks and project list for recommendation of an 187 program. At the October meeting, the commission recommended the following as priority projects for 1987. Project Priorities - 1987 Construction priorities for parks are as follows: (A) Design and development: 1. Thomas Lake 2. O'Leary Park 3. Lakeside Park 4. Carnelian Park 5. Vienna Woods Construction Contracts - • (a) Tennis court construction for: 1. Ridgecliff Park 2. Walnut Hill 3. Blue Cross/Blue Shield 4. O'Leary 5. Ron's (resurfacing) (C) Hockey Rink Lights for: 1. Quarry (2) 2. Blue Cross/Blue Shield (2) 3. Pilot Knob (1) Hockey Rink Construction - City forces Blue Cross/Blue Shield (2) Corry Park (2), Pilot Knob Park (1) (D) Shelter Buildings: 1. Quarry Park 2. Blue Cross/Blue Shield 3. Carnelian (warming hose). /,7/ Commission also recognizes that additional work in terms of landscaping plans for parks constructed, under the 86 contract, would also be prepared and implemented during the year,. With the grading of the Bur Oaks Addition, Bur Oaks Park grading was also part of the development agreement, and staff will be preparing an improvement contracts for this particular park as well. Yet to be determined is the prioriety of installation of playground equipment at approximately 11 locations of which 5 are to be selected for eventual installation. Council Action - It would be appropriate for accept the commission's recommendation prior'ti(1," s and concur with this project list. Director Parks and Recreation KV/cks /5 the City Council to s for '87 project ,• • Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight There are thirteen (13) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Pending the additional review of contractor licensing proposed at the time of the fee schedule review, there are no contractor licenses submitted for approval at this time. 14 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City,Council Meeting Page Nine PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items --There are three (3')`, items to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. 1,. Seasonal Skating Rink Staff --The following persons are recom- mended for hire by Recreation Supervisor Peterson as seasonal, part-time skating rink staff members: RETURNING STAFF EXPERIENCED SUMMER STAFF NEW STAFF Jon Cudo Brent Eichten James Gilbertson Tricia Gilbertson Rebecca Latzke Kim Opatz Richard Robohm Adam Wortman Ben Anderson Susan Lindblade Gina Penn Tamara Sova John VonBank Jason Bellanti Robb -ie DeRosier John Doran Matt Dow Kevin Duffy Tim Gill Marjorie Hrimnak Tom McNuklin Robert Merrill Dale Otto Dawn Rapp Brent Tait ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of the above listed personnel as seasonal, part-time skating, rink staff members for the 1986-87 skating season. 2. Temporary Part-time Clerk -Typist (Planning) --The City has • received a letter of .resignation from Denise Christensen, the temporary clerk -typist in the Planning Department, effective December 19, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Denise Christensen and to authorize advertisement for her replacement for the temporary clerk -typist position in the Planning Department. 17 • Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting. Page Ten 3. Appointment of Doug Reid as acting Chief Building Inspector -- Dale Peterson's resignation/retirement as Chief Building Official is effective December 31, 1986. It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that Doug Redd, Assistant Chief Building Official, be appointed as acting Chief 'Building Official until a replacement is selected for that position. it has been customary that the City increase the assistant's salary by 108 while assuming the responsibilities as acting Chief Building Official. The 108 increase would reflect the 1987 rate of compensation. The City Administrator will brief the City Council as a part of additional information at the end of the meeting regarding the vacancy of Chief Building Official. ACITON TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve and designate Doug Reid as the acting Chief Building Official with a 108 adjustment to his normal salary effective January 1, 1987. ►L Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Eleven Memo City Council Meeting RENEWAL 1987 OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BIG.TOP WINES & SPIRITS C. Renewal - 1987 off -,sale liquor license for Big Top Wines & Spirits --In November 1986, an off -sale liquor license was granted to Sidco, Inc. in the name of Big Top Wines & Spirits. Because the renewals were considered in October, it will be necessary to consider a renewal of the off -sale liquor license for Sidco effective 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a renewal of the off -sale liquor license for Sidco, Inc. is the name of Big Top Wines & Spirits for 1987. RENEWAL 1987 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR DOUGHERTY'S D. Renewal - 1987 on -sale liquor license for Dougherty' S --The on -sale liquor license for Dougherty"s, in the name of Robert Dougherty, was granted in November 1986..Since renewals were enacted during October 1986, it will be necessary to consider the renewal for this on -sale liquor license effective January 1, 1987. This application is in order for renewal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the on -sale liquor renewal for Dougherty's in the name of Robert Dougherty. AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE/BROADWAY PIZZA E. Amusement device license for Broadway Pizza --Broadway Pizza has recently purchased Slicers Pizza in the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. Twin City Novelty has made application to add two (2) video games at that restaurant. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amusement device license to allow for the installation of two (2) video games at Broadway Pizza. i9 Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twelve Memo City Council Meeting APROVE AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT SCHEDULES (ROYAL OAK CIRCLE 1ST & 2ND ADDITIONS) F. Approve Amendment to Development Contract Schedules (Royal Oak Circle 1st and 2nd Additions) --The progression of the Royal Oaks Circle apartment complex was delayed by the developer due to difficulties in obtaining final funding from HUD for the con- struction of this development. The developer has subsequently been approved for revenue bonds through the City of Eagan to assist with the progression. However, the delays that have been incurred result in the requirement to amend the development contract agreement to provide appropriate extensions of completion dates. • Subsequently, the developer is requesting Council approval to amend paragraph four of the development contracts for the Royal Oak Circle 1st and 2nd Additionsto stipulate the completion dates of October 1, 1987 for all major streets, utilities and driveways and July 15, 1988 for all remaining final restoration items. This extension request amendment has been reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To amend paragraph four of the development contract agreement for Royal Oaks Circle 1st and 2nd Additions to provide for extensions on the completion dates as referenced. PROJECT 486, RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING G. Project 486, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the proposed expansion of the E -Z Air Park, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report providing for storm sewer facilities. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to be held on February 3., 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 486 (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) and order the public hearing to be held February 3, 1987. am Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Thirteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 490, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT H. Project 490, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Woodgate Lane -Street Lights,) --The staff has received a petition from eleven of seventeen property owners on Woodgate Lane requesting the installation of street lights for this portion of Mallard Park 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page _12G is a map showing the location of the petitioners on this cul-de-sac requesting street lights. ACTION TO BE,CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for` Project 490, Woodgate Lane (Street Lights). -0 w _ � 9pOs i � M ._s ee•zdO1m xso___ 160 ptt = I H, m M C 2 R" W m. MJ• T F �mAw l' 'J i. ^ ` $ .O�Do O Reln De ^ ` r.2 9041 1 A •T0 ••'ex yyar 6'D soa 17 J ',: CJ TOr• 7 v I Lj = \• q J V s \ i• q, •w ^' I l wn• von t.^• 3 ^r. 11 •t . �\O • T \s • • q . " w PiiTlIMES PER 1977 AER S PHOTO -----� g City of.Eagan z / Part of 015-50 ~ 4 I COMPANY EA•EVEMT PER•9004 R°. ,PAGE NO. AM. NISC, RECORDS �I f OYW. ^ 018-80 ..55• ES:: a 5E`° s ` 8:•: ::''..• :::' .::•:' )pp.�C • �<.,yF ` \ I. e'hI011N xK.Ze •'i5 5; b55: 9 n 9 X21 ).26 36 .dj., .. ........ ..: ix•'r31 •o'TA mA.sA a eiT Ti I M2�r° to d sa 3p Y Y . ,mi m 4�.ii 8 /� )OB N• S�•C •y I 4 \ )• ein I 32 q 22 �! 1 M es- - ` w 4, 145 as - 21 Us 24 0 ° " J R.eeM _ r R $ NrPdos ,ta• •_ .� 2syi C 26 C Or'J�6B ys 8 66 Z6 1800 90 MJ 9 27 C_ U N _ D C_ m a�C.\v R2.29 itl Mae59YC. mgSO )0 \ Y96 e0 6177 w e , LLARD i 1021 RTum ...8 03 . R•OeEYI 5•�'2e•E. ]Oe.SD a G•RPAED o DRIVE C) DRIVE 1 9 w9.10 8.422. 1 "45 mD69t Dei 1 Y.0 1 90.14 •0.•S� 61.76 Ye'A2'xE' • e -s2' 4. ^• s 2 90 BO 890Sr I 5 o r -•M. RD.ST ,80 v0,2o ^ •O v° •o ^ •0 1ee.m t• n nPa ue• . ), e• s ew1 -Re« •y uu. I w 8` .y15 t.-ewr •gw4m e0 16 -- w 117 13 OUTLOT ,••7 2I 8 - 1IB A •-�'�•9+'iii 'T. str.N.F 24 y,oe�[ °G O. v M NNN LL CJ v I Lj = -`•• 8 .. Ra � � • •° •IIS • wn• von t.^• 3 ^r. PiiTlIMES PER 1977 AER S PHOTO -----� g City of.Eagan z / Part of 015-50 ~ 4 I COMPANY EA•EVEMT PER•9004 R°. ,PAGE NO. AM. NISC, RECORDS �I f OYW. ^ 018-80 ..55• ES:: a 5E`° s ` 8:•: ::''..• :::' .::•:' )pp.�C • �<.,yF ` \ I. e'hI011N xK.Ze •'i5 5; b55: 9 n 9 X21 ).26 36 .dj., .. ........ ..: ix•'r31 •o'TA mA.sA a eiT Ti I M2�r° to d sa 3p Y Y . ,mi m 4�.ii 8 /� )OB N• S�•C •y I 4 \ )• ein I 32 q 22 �! 1 M es- - ` w 4, 145 as - 21 Us 24 0 ° " J R.eeM _ r R $ NrPdos ,ta• •_ .� 2syi C 26 C Or'J�6B ys 8 66 Z6 1800 90 MJ 9 27 C_ U N _ D C_ m a�C.\v R2.29 itl Mae59YC. mgSO )0 \ Y96 e0 6177 w e , LLARD i 1021 RTum ...8 03 . R•OeEYI 5•�'2e•E. ]Oe.SD a G•RPAED o DRIVE C) DRIVE 1 9 w9.10 8.422. 1 "45 mD69t Dei 1 Y.0 1 90.14 •0.•S� 61.76 Ye'A2'xE' • e -s2' 4. ^• s 2 90 BO 890Sr I 5 o r -•M. RD.ST ,80 v0,2o ^ •O v° •o ^ •0 1ee.m t• n nPa ue• . ), e• s ew1 -Re« •y uu. I w 8` .y15 t.-ewr •gw4m e0 16 -- w 117 13 OUTLOT ,••7 2I 8 - 1IB A •-�'�•9+'iii 'T. str.N.F 24 y,oe�[ Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Fourteen Memo City Council Meeting SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATIONS/MN DOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST I. Speed Limit Desingations/MnDOT Speed Study Request (Miscel- laneous Streets) --With the continuedexpansion and growth within the City of Eagan, several new streets are being constructed requiring .speed limit designations to be established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to insure legal enforcement of the appropriate speeds,. In order to get the speed limit established by MnDOT, it is necessary to request a speed study. Enclosed on pages � and Z�, is a copy of the resolution with the attached listing of streets requesting MnDOT's study and designation of the appropriate enforceable speed limits • referencing both the existing and staff's recommendation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution requesting MnDOT to perform a speed study for speed limit designa- tion on miscellaneous streets and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • Z3 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATION MnDOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has recently constructed or upgraded several streets, within the community; and, WHEREAS, the City would like to establish enforceable speed limits along those local streets referenced on the attached Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the, City of. Eagan, Dakota County, hereby requests MnDOT District 9 to perform all required speed studies necessary to designate • the proper speed limit for those streets referenced in the attached Exhibit A. Motion by: Seconded by: Members in Favor: Members Opposed: Dated: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN ATTEST: - By. City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a RESOLUTION adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota on December 16, 1966. Seal E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan Z� • Existing state roadway to be turned back to City in 1987. MAP SECT. 1,2 1,2 3 10 12 14 15 15 16,17 17 •18 19 22 25,26 26 30 31 32 32,33 33 EBRIBIT A OF RESOLUTION REQUESTING SPEED STUDY FOR SPEED LIMITS STREET FROM TO Lone Oak Parkway O'Neil Drive T.H. 149 Northwest Parkway T.H. 149 Lone Oak Parkway Corporate Center Curve Corp. Center Dr. Corp. Center Dr. Eagandale Place Lone Oak Road Lone Oak Road T.H. 55 Frontage Road East of Trunk Highway 149 Golfview Dr. Lexington Ave. Yankee Doodle Rd. Town Centre Dr. Duckwood Dr. Lexington Ave. Krestwood Lane Duckwood Dr. Crestridge Lane Ashbury Road Blue Cross Rd. Blackhawk Hills Rd Blackhawk Rd. Highway 13 Kennebec Dr,. Nicols Rd. Silver Bell Rd Old Highway 13 County Road 30 Denmark Ave. Westcott Rd. Golden Meadow Road Trenton Trail Daniel Dr Cliff Dr. Rahn Rd. Rahn Cliff Ct. Johnny Cake Ridge Rd. Covington Lane Trenton Trail Nicols Road Cliff Road Rahn Road Cliff Road Beacon Hill Rd Z� Minnesota River Cedar Ave. Freeway Deerwood Dr. Dodd Road West Terminus Cliff Road Pin Oak Drive Rahn Road Apple Valley East End Terminus E%ISTING None None None 30 30 30 None None 30 30 40 u0 30 None None 30 30 None 45 None PROPOSED 35 35 30 30 30 30 35 30 35 35 35 35 35 30 35 30 30 30 45 30 Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page;Fifteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 491, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER_FEASIBILITY REPORT J. Project 491, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagan Hills Farm Addition -Trunk Utilities and Streets) --The staff has received a petition from several of the property owners to be incorporatedinto the proposed Eagan Hills Farm planned unit development currently being processed through the City under a PUD rezoning. This petition is requesting the installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer along with the installation of the interior community collector street network. All costs associated with the preparation of this feasibility report have been guaranteed in case the project is not approved as a result of the application process. Due to the extensive scope of the project and the time necessary to prepare the feasibility report, it was recommended that the Council receive this petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition for Project 491 (Eagan Hills Farm -Trunk Utilities and Streets) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. PROJECT 492, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT K. Project 492, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive -Streets and Utilities) --The staff has received a petition for the upgrading of the remaining un- improved section of O' -Neill Drive adjacent to I-494 between Dodd • Road (T.H. 149) and Argenta Trail .(Inver Grove Heights;), in addition to the installation of sanitary sewer and trunk water main facilities necessary to service the proposed Lone Oak 2nd Addition. All costs- have been guaranteed for the preparation of this feasibility report if, for some reason, the project is not approved at the time of the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 492 (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neill Drive -Streets and Utilities) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. VACATION OF UTILITY AND PONDING EASEMENTS L. Vacation of Utilities and Ponding Easements, Receive Petition/ Order Public Hearing (Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition) --The staff has received a petition requesting the vacation of existing ponding easements and sanitary sewer utility easements previously dedicated as a part of Outlot M of the Lone Oak Addition. This request is necessary to allow the development of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition which will be rededicating the required easements for both purposes 7� Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page. Sixteen Memo City Council Meeting in a location and alignment conforming to the proposed develop- ment of that subdivision. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate utility and, ponding easements (Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition'•) and schedule the public hearing to be held January 20, 1987. 0 Z, Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen APPROVE REVISED AMBULANCE CONTRACT M. Approve Revised Ambulance Contract:, Abolishing a Local Government Subsidy --The City has received a revised copy of the Ambulance Service Agreement, copies enclosed on pages �� through _31 , that abolishes the per capita subsidy /each community has been providing on a calendar basis for several years. It was the decision of Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital • that user rates would be adjusted to more accurately reflect capital and operating expenses. As a result of the restructuring of user fees, it was determined that a subsidy would.,no longer be required. The last ambulance agreement was adopted for four (4) years, including the years of 1985 through 1988. This new Ambulance Service Agreement will revise the existing agreement for the two (2) remaining years of 1987 and 1988. The Cities of Inver Grove Heights, South St. Paul, and Mendota Heights have all approved the agreement as presented. This action will allow the City Council to reprioritize approximately $44,,000 that was budgeted for the per capita ambulance subsidy in 1987. Through recent City Council discussion, it was determined that $30,000 would be allocated to the Fire Department to participate in the Fire Training Center that will be constructed in the City of Burnsville, and the remaining $14,000 would be • added to the contingency fund to off -set comparable worth adjustments and other expenses incurred in 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Ambulance Service Agreement as revised for, 1987/1988. x AMBULANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT made and entered into effective the first day of January, 1987, by and between the cities of Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Mendota Heights, Rosemount, Sunfish Lake, Mendota, and Lilydale, thereinafter referred to as "Cities", and D.R.M.H., Inc., d/b/a Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital, hereinafter referred to as "Hospital". WHEREAS, the Hospital, a Minnesota corporation, desires to provide paramedic ambulance service to the Cities, and WHEREAS, the Cities, desire to jointly assure that adequate ambulance service is available. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants, agreements and matters set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Nature of Ambulance Service to be Provided. ® The Hospital agrees to provide paramedic ambulance service to the Cities. 2. Duties and Responsibilities of the Hospital. As a part of its duty and responsibility to furnish ambulance service to the Cities, the Hospital agrees that it will: a. Either own or lease and operate two fully equipped paramedic ambu- lances meeting state license requirements. b. Maintain and staff each ambulance on a 24-hour basis, seven (7) days per week. c. Staff each ambulance with two (2) paramedics with National Certification. • d. Be self-sustaining without reducing the level of service to which it has agreed. 3. Fee to be paid by the Cities There will be no fee paid by the Cities for the contract period. 4. Miscellaneous Terms a. There shall be no employment relationship established by this Agreement. The Hospital, in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all times, be an independent contractor. Ambulance drivers, attendants and parame- dics performing duties for the hospital are employees of the Hospital and the Cities shall have no right to direct, control or influence their actions, nor shall the Cities in any way, be responsible for their acts, their salary or any employment benefits. Likewise, police officers, firefighters or other employees or agents of the Cities are under the sole direction of the Cities and Hospital shall have no right to direct, control or influence their actions, nor shall the Hospital in any way, be responsible for their acts, their salaries or any employment benefits. 1_y -2- b. The Hospital is required to maintain full and complete administra- tive and medical supervision and control over the ambulance service provided during the course of this Agreement. In this regard, the Hospital shall beresponsible to the patient during the course of transportation of the patient to the Hospital and agrees to maintain in force, policies of insurance as set forth in Article 6 herein. c. Except as indicated above, this AGREEMENT be amended only 'upon 60 days written notice by either party, setting forth the requested amendment before the anniversary date of this Agreement which shall be January 1. d. Any disputes betweenthe Cities and Hospital arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Arbitration Act of the State of Minnesota, by a Board of Arbitrators composed of three members. The Hospital shall appoint one arbitrator, the Cities shall appoint one arbitrator and the two so appointed shall select the • third arbitrator. Within 45 days of the occurrence giving rise to arbitration, the party demanding arbitration shall notify the other party in writing of such demand specifying the matter to be submitted to arbitration and the name of the arbitrator selected by the party making such demand. Upon receipt of such writ- ten notice, the other party shall have ten (10) days in which to select an arbitrator, and to specify any matters which such party desires to have sub- mitted to arbitration and to notify the other party in writing of such selec- tion, and the two arbitrators so selected shall have ten (10) days in which to select a third arbitrator. In the event the third arbitrator is not so selected within said ten (10) days, such third' arbitrator shall be appointed by the District Court of Dakota County, Minnesota, upon application of any party after at least eight (8) days' notice to the other parties of such application. Arbitration shall be the exclusive remedy for the settlement of disputes arising under this Agreement and no action at law or in equity shall be instituted by any party hereto other than to enforce the award of the arbitrators. 5. Terms of Contract This contract shall commence on January 1, 1987, and shall be in full force and effect for two (2) years, with the anniversary date being January 1 of each year, subject to the provisions herein contained. 6. Insurance and Hold Harmless. a. The Hospital during the term of this Agreement, agress to maintain in force general liability, auto liability and property damage insurance with minimum limits of $300,000 per person, $500,000 per accident, and $100,000 per occurrence for property damage with such insurance policies to name each city as an Additional Named Insured. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with each City. b. The Hospital agrees to maintain in force the proper Worker's Compensation Insurance for its ambulance service employees. c. The Hospital agrees to hold harmless each City from any and all claims or legal action resulting from operation of the ambulance service. 3(D -3 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, con- sisting of three (3) pages the day and year first above written. DIVINE REDEEMER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CITY OF By r. -&V_ -e-.� By A ministrator By Chairman of the Board • 151 29 City and November 25, 1986 Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Eighteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 466, PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADING A. Pubic Hearing for Project 466 Pilot Knob Road Upgrading -- This project provides for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (C.H. 31) to a five lane urban road section (curb and gutter) with related storm sewer facilities from I -35E to Rebecca Lane (one-half mile from Apple Valley). This project also proposes to upgrade portions of Diffley Road (C.H_ 3'0) and Cliff Road ('C.H. 32') approximately ; mile in either direction of their intersection with Pilot Knob Road. A public informational meeting was held at City Hall on December 3, 1986. Approximately 200 letters were sent to all property owners who were adjacent to any proposed. construction (whether or not they were to be assessed) informing them of this informa- tional meeting. Approximately 125 persons were in attendance at that meeting where City and County staff explained the project in detail. Before the City can approve a cost participation agreement with the County, necessary for the construction of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary that this project be discussed and approved at a formal public hearing because of the proposed assessments anticipated with this project necessary to help finance the City's cost of this county road project. 171 ` public hearing notices were sent to only those property owners who are proposed to be • assessedunder this feasibility report for either street improve- ments or storm sewer lateral. Because of the detailed presentation that was provided at the December 3 informational meeting, the staff will provide an abbreviated presentation and be available for any questions that the Council or affected public may have. Due to the length of the feasibility report, it is being provided to the Council under separate cover for their information and review during the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve Project 466, Pilot Knob Road - Streets and Storm Sewer. 3v Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen FOR PROJECT 479 B. Public Hearing for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park ('Trunk Storm Sewer) ---If the pending final plat approval of the Lexington Hills Addition and the Lexington Square 6th Addition, in addition to the scheduled upgrading of County Road 43 (Lexington Avenue) in two years, it is necessary to install that portion of the trunk storm sewer system from Northview Park to McCarthy Lake within Patrick Egan Park. On November 18, the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing to be held on December 16. Enclosed on pages 3l through � is a copy of that feasibility report for the Council's information and reference during this public hearing.. All notices have been: published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners who are proposed to be assessed under' this project. The consultant and staff personnel will be available to describe this project in further detail and to answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 479 (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications. 33 REPORT ON LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK ®. (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT No. 479 FILE No. 49401 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS R ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 3f� Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 November 20, 1986 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Lexington Avenue/Northview Park (Pond JP -29, JP -34 Outlet) Trunk Storm Sewer Project No. 479 File No. 49401 Dear Mayor and Council: ORo G. 80.'.. RE Ruder W. R..,. Y.E. J=IPh C AnMdik. Y.E. Bra✓lwd A. L.bm, P.E. Rirhanl E. TWrrm P.E. Juma C. Obun, P.E. Gk.. R. Cwk, P.E. Krish A.'Gwdun, Y.E. Th.. E. N.Jn. P.E. R.Aard'W. P=wr, P.E. Robin G. 5[hanlrhr. P.E. M.M. L. Sw &, P.E. Dt wM C. B.q.al. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mart A. Holuon. P.E. T,d K. FWd, P.E. WhM T. Raulma .. P.E. Rubin R. PlelJnk, P. E. David O. Lwkole, P.E. Thom= W. l4lrnun, Y.E. MRharl C. LT.eh. P.E. Kart. L. Willa. P.E. Jamas R. Muland. P.E. Kr mh P. Amlrnon, P.E. Kwh A. Barhmonn. P.E. Murk R. Raul• P.E. Robin C. Ruuek. A.I.A. Th.. E. An,=. P.E. Svu L. Too.,. P.E. Charts A. &wk. Leo M. P. ehk, Huns. M. Obun Sown M. Ederlln Enclosed is our report for Lexington Avenue /Nor thview Park (Pond JP -29, JP -34 Outlet), Project No. 479. This report covers trunk storm sewer improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at.a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BOO'NEESSTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK t: ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson ^ Daaattte: November 20, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: / G2o JJ unYX.�i¢ Department of Public Works Date: P-o2f4r (0 0681e 35 30 Year SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of gravity storm sewer out- lets for Ponds JP -29 and JP -34 as designated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. These outlets are required at this .time due to the proposed develop-. ments of Lexington Square 6th Addition (Northview Park Road) which will convey run-off to Pond JP -34 and Lexington Hills Addition which will convey run-off to Pond JP -29. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan with one exception. The exception being that 40 its proposed to construct the storm sewer .outlet from Pond JP -34 (located in Northview Park) based on a 5 cfs outflow (42.7 acre-feet of storage) as opposed to 10 cfs outflow (30.0 acre-feet of storage) as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The reduced outflow results in a HWL of 892.6 which the impact to the park is shown on the attached drawing. As shown, only the parking area would be temporarily under water during a 100 year event which is not felt to be significant. This project can .best be carried out as one contract. ® DISCUSSION: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing gravity storm sewer outlets from Pond JP -29 and JP -34 to Pond JP -9 as shown on the attached drawing. Pond JP -29 is located northeast of Lexington Hills Addition and will receive its storm water run-off. Presently Pond JP -29 is receiving storm water run-off from the existing storm sewer in Lexington .Avenue which extends south from County Road 30 and is located in Lexington Hills Addition. Pond JP -34 which is located in Northview Park presently receives storm water runoff from only that area which is directly tributary to it. Design considerations for each pond is listed below: Page 1. 068le Mlr NWL RWL Storage Pond Elevation Elevation Volume Outflow JP -29 926 945 52.4 Ac. Ft. 1.3 cfs JP -34 894 892.6 42.6 Ac. Ft. 5.0 cfs Storm sewer pipes range in size from 18" RCP to 42" RCP as shown on the attached drawing. EASEMENTS: The proposed storm sewer is for the most part located within City of Eagan park property except for that storm sewer located within Parcel 017-54. However, Lexington Hills Addition which is being platted at this time is located within Parcel 017-54 and a condition of its approval is that the required easements for this project be dedicated. Listed below is the ease- ment required for this project. Permanent Temporary Parcel Easement Easement SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 0.9 acre 4.3 acre AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Parcel 010-53 NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, 2 Block 1 Page 2. O68le 3� C 10 ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4 Section 23 SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 012-26 (Northview Park) Parcel 010-50 Parcel 014-26 (Part of Northview Park) Parcel 020-50 Parcel 010-28 Parcel 012-52 (Northview Park) Parcel 020-54 (Northview Park) Parcel 013-52 (Northview Park) Parcel 010-53 NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, 2 Block 1 Page 2. O68le 3� C 10 I COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $362,990 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are es- timated at 30 percent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to levied against the benefited proper- ty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral assessment costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area. stormsewer as- sessment which have not previously been assessed and benefit from this prof- ect. It is also proposed to assess the cost of the north -south 27" RCP storm sewer included entirely within the future street right-of-way as a. lateral. This storm sewer is designed to convey run-off directly from Parcel 017-54 to • the east -west trunk storm sewer and, therefore, its cost is proposed to be as- sessed entirely to Parcel 017-54. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report and apply to this project area as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Single - Family 0.050/sq.ft. Multi - Family 0.064/sq.ft. Page 3. 068le 39 REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of the project are as follows: Trunk Lateral Trunk Assessment Lateral Assessment Project Cost Revenue $333,180 29,810 $362,990 The anticipated project deficit is $56,105. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 0681e Page 4. 3� $277,075 29,810 $306,885 Balance —$56,105 November 18, 1986 December 16, 1986 Winter, 1987 Spring, 1987 Summer, 1987 Fall, 1987 Spring, 1988 40 n LJ APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SE14ER PROJECT NO. 479 40 L.F. 42" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $54/l.f. $ 2,160 950 L.F. 36" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' deep in place @ $78/l.f. 74,100 80 L:F. Jack or auger 36" RCP storm sewer @ $250/l.f. 20,000 1,150 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $38/l.f. 43,700 • 400 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' deep in place @ $68/l.f. 27,200 650 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $26/l.f. 16,900 500 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer 10'-20' deep in place @ $42/l.f. 21,000 870 L.F. 12" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $20/l.f. 17,400 15 Each Standard 4' diameter MH with casting @ $1,000/each 15,000 110 L.F. Manhole depth greater than 8' in place @ $70/l.f. 7,700 1. Each 42" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $1,200/each 1,200 1 Each 18" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $400/each 600 1 Each 12" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $400/'each 400 20 C.Y. Rip rap @ $100/cu.yd. 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $1,000 1,000 ® 10 Acre Seed w/mulch and fertilizer @ $800/acre 8,000 300 C.Y. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10/cu.yd. 3,000 4,560 L.F. Mechanical trench compactor @ $1/l.f. 4,560 Total $265,920 + 5% Contingencies 13,300 $279,220 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 83,770 TOTAL ................ $362,990 Page 5. 068le ,�jl A. TRUNK AREA Parcel Description NW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 012-26 NP (1) Parcel 014-26 NP (1) Parcel 014-26 Parcel 010-28 Parcel 020-54 NP (1) NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-04 SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-50 Parcel 020-50 Parcel 012-52 NP (1) Parcel 013-52 NP (1) Parcel 010-53 Parcel 017-54 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 B. LATERAL BENEFIT Parcel Description SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 068le APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 479 Area Assessable Rate/ Total (Sq.Ft.) Credit Area Sq. Ft. Assessment 396,900 Street 20% 317,520 $0.05 $15,876 132,000 -- 132,000 0.05 6,600 104,000 -- 104,000 0.05 5,200 141,230 Large Lot 60,050 0.05 3,002 106,500 -- 64,000 0.05 5,325 64,000 -- 64,000 0.05 3,200 36,672 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 36,672 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 1,296,900 Pond 84,000 970,320 0.05 48,516 Street 20% 434,260 Street 20% 347,400 0.05 17,370 1,685,640 Street 20% 1,348,510 0.05 67,425 1,584,000 Street 20% 1,267,200 0.064 81,101 504,000 Street 20% 403,200 0.05 20,160 16,511 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 16,511 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 Total Trunk Area 277,075 (1) NP - Northview Park Total Assessment Page 6. $29,810 • � I N � I o o � ° I I S R / o Q • IIW 0If1 y 1• 1 a Oy 9A 6 � V L BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK do ASSOCIATES, INC. (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) Engineers do Architects TRUNK STORM SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: NOV. 1988Comm. 49401 P'ROJ. No. 479 OJ y I N - c< N c 97w 1 1 y m - A 0 O Z m w N m ; A Q = O o • � I N � I o o � ° I I S R / o Q • IIW 0If1 y 1• 1 a Oy 9A 6 � V L BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK do ASSOCIATES, INC. (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) Engineers do Architects TRUNK STORM SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: NOV. 1988Comm. 49401 P'ROJ. No. 479 LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP-29,JP-34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: NOV. 1988 Comm. 49401 I I 1f PROJ. No. 479 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty IC 485 C. Public Hearing for Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition/ Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) --With the continued phased development of the Lexington Square 6th Addition, it will be necessary to upgrade Northview Park Road from Lexington Avenue to the east line of the park property, including the installation of appropriate utilities. On November 18, the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing to be 'held on December 16. Enclosed on pages -V5 through � is a copy of the feasibility report ® for the Council's information and reference during this public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. Consultant and staff personnel will be available to discuss this project in detail and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition/ Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications. ?Ar • REPORT ON LEXINGTON SQUARE 6th ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA •:. FILE No. 49405 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 05 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.6364600 November 6, 1986 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lexington Square 6th Addition (Northview Park Road) Street and utility Improvements Project No. 485 File No. 49405 Dear Mayor and Council: Ouo G. Bonnvuu. P.E. Naber W. Nwrnr, P.E. Ja ,h C, Andrrlik. P.E. Bradford A. Lanbem P.E. Richard E. Tamer, P, E. Jany, C. Glean. P.E. clrnn R. Cw ' P.E. h'rilh A, Gallon, Y.E. Thum- E. Nay.., P E. Richard W. katrr. P.E. Rab,, G. Schavchl, P.E. Marvin L. Survala, P.E. Lbna/d C. BarYardq P.E. Jerry A. Buudon, P.E Mark A. Na -an, P.E. Ted K. Field P.E. Michael T. Rdmmann. P. E, Rahrn N. Phllrllr. Y.E. Oarid0 Lwluw, P£. Th... W. Prunan. P.E. Michael C. Leach, P.E. h'aan L. Willa, P.E. JamrY R. Morand, P E. Rrnnnh P. Andrnan. P E. Erllh A, tlwhnwnn, P.F. Murk R. Rai P E. Rahn C. R.,k, A.I.A. Thane, E. Anka,. P.E. S.vn L. Ya..,. P.E. Chad,, A. Erid6un 4o M. Pawrhke llarlan M. Oh.. Swan M. Ebrdin r 1 U Enclosed is our report for Lexington Squre 6th Addition (Northview Park Road), Project No. 485. This report covers utility and street improvements and in— cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00,R/OSSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li • I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J v�- �, Mark A. Hanson Date: November 6, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: 1D6partment of Public Works Date: 0439e YSo 30 Year SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of utilities and street in Northview Park Road to 1/2 mile east of Lexington Avenue. Northview Park Road abuts Lexington Square 6th Addition on its north side and Northview Park and one unplatted undeveloped parcel on its south side. Also included is upgrad- ing a small segment of Clinton Trail and Savannah Road immediately north of Northview Park Road. Northview Park Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street in the City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT ® for the review and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOWIENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes extending an .8" diam- eter sanitary sewer in Northview Park Road east and west from Clinton Trail. • The sanitary sewer will connect to the existing sanitary sewer in Clinton Trail located approximately 150' north of Northview Park Road. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to serve the property abutting Northview Park Road and the property located south (Parcel 017-54) of North - view Park. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes extending a 16" diameter trunk water main in Northview Park Road east from an existing trunk water main in Lexington Avenue. Also included is the extension of 'a 6" diameter main in Clinton Trail and Savannah Road north from. Northview Park Road connecting to existing 6" mains. The proper number of valves and hydrants is also included. Page 1. 0439e /1 The property abutting Northview Park Road, is located in the intermediate pres- sure zone and will experience static and residual pressures of approximately 67 and 50 psi respectively. SERVICES: Sanitary sewer and water services (4" diameter sewer and 1" diame- ter water) are proposed to be extended 15' beyond the right-of-way line to each of the platted lots in Lexington Square 6th Addition and the unplatted property (Parcel 014-26, 6 lot equivalents) in anticipation of future develop- ment. Two 4" diameter water services for irrigation and one 6" diameter sewer service are proposed to be extended to Northview Park. • STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein includes two separate lateral sys- tems conveying runoff from two low points in Northview Park .Road as shown on the attached drawing. The easterly storm sewer system will collect runoff from the backyards of Block 2 Lexington Square 6th Addition and the easterly low point in Northview Park Road. The storm sewer will be constructed along the main entrance road to Northview Park and discharge into Pond JP -34. Pond JP -34 presently does not have a storm sewer outlet, however, as part of Proj- ect No. 479 Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, the outlet for this pond is also being proposed at this time. It is anticipated its construction will occur next spring. The westerly storm sewer will collect runoff from the westerly low point in Northview Park Road and be constructed through the undeveloped portion of Northview Park. The storm sewer will connect to the existing storm sewer serving as the outlet for Pond JP -34 to be constructed as part of Proj- ect No. 479. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes upgrading Northview Park Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 44' width which provides for parking on both sides. An 8' wide bituminous trail is proposed on the south side abut - 0439e 2. 0439e oQ ting the park. Clinton Trail and Savannah Road will be constructed to a resi- dential design thickness and a 32' width. EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary easements from Lexington Square 6th Addi- tion will be dedicated through the platting process. Easements required from the unplatted parcel located south of Northview Park Road will bededicated by separate document. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION • Lot 1-11, Block 1 Lot 1-19, Block 2 Lot 1-3, Block 3 NORTHVIEW PARK Parcel 012-26, 013-52, 012-52, 020-54, Part of 014-26 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 010-78 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 4P Part of Parcel 014-26 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 61,850 Water Main 137,010 Services 48,880 Storm Sewer 105,630 Street 325,890 TOTAL ...................... $679,260 Page 3. 0439e SjG The total estimated project cost is $679,260 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to levied against the benefited proper- ty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the lat- est bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a per lot or equivalent lot basis. Trunk area san- itary sewer has been previously assessed to all benefiting property under Project 365. WATER MAIN: The 16" water main in Northview Park Road is considered trunk. Therefore, it is proposed to assess the property abutting Northview Park Road the lateral benefit from trunk rate based on the residential equivalent rate. • The lateral water main in Clinton Trail and Savannah Road will be assessed en- tirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition based on its final cost. It is also proposed to assess those parcels within 1/4 mile of the trunk water main their trunk area water assessment if they have not been previously assessed. Lex- ington Square 6th Addition and property adjacent to Lexington Avenue were levied Trunk Area Water Assessments under Projects 467 and 395 respectively. SERVICES: Services are proposed to be assessed based on the total cost of each service serving that lot or parcel. Page 4. 0439e �D STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is lateral. Therefore, it is pro- posed to assess lateral storm sewer on a front foot basis to the benefited property adjacent to Northview Park Road. Trunk area storm sewer for this area is proposed to be assessed as part of Project No. 479 Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer. STREET: Northview Park Road is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis based on the residential equivalent rate to all property abutting Northview Park Road. Clinton Trail and Savannah Road are proposed to be assessed en- tirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition. In addition, it is proposed, that the bituminous trail be assessed entirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report and apply to this project are as follows: WATER MAIN Trunk Area: Single -Family $1,190/Ac. Lateral Benefit from Trunk: Single Family $11.88/F.F. STREET Residential Equivalent $33.75/F.F. • REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $ 61,850 Lateral Assessment $ 61,850 $ 61,850 $ 61,850 - 0 - Page 5. 0439e J/ The anticipated project deficit is —$84,113. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. Page 6. 0439e • Project Cost Revenue Balance WATER MAIN Lateral $ 6,550 Trunk 130,460 Lateral Assessment $ 6,550 Lateral Benefit from Trunk 61,341 Trunk Area 96,390 $137,010 $164,281 +$27,271 SERVICES Lateral $ 51,630 Lateral Assessment $ 51,630 $ 51,630 $ 51,630 — 0 — STORM SEWER Lateral $105,630 Lateral Assessment $105,630 $105,630 $105,630 — 0 — STREET Street $325,890 Street Assessment $214,506 $325 890 $214 506 —$111 384 The anticipated project deficit is —$84,113. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. Page 6. 0439e • 171 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans 6 Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 0439e Page 7. -53 November 18, 1986 December 16, 1986 January, 1987 Spring, 1987 Fall, 1987 Winter/Spring, 1988 May, 1989 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 A. SANITARY SEWER 2,500 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $13.00/lin.ft. $ 32,500 8 Each Standard 4' diameter MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 7,600 20 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. $70.00/each 1,400 1 Each Connect to existing 8" sanitary sewer @ $300.00/each 300 36 Each 8"x4" wye branch @ $50.00/each 1,800 1 Each 8"x6" wye branch @ $70.00/each 70 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,450 Total $ 47,120 +5% Contingencies 2,360 $ 49,480 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 12,370 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 61,850 B. WATER MAIN 2,620 Lin.ft. 16" DIP water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 68,120 450 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 5,400 5 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 5,000 2 Each 16" Butterfly valve and box @ $1,500.00/each 3,000 6 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 2,100 12,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 15,600 1 Each Connect to existing 16" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 2 Each Connect to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 600 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 3,070 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,070 Total $104,390 +5% Contingencies 5,220 $109,610 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 27,400 TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................. $137,010 Page 8. 0439e 5X • TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $105;630 Page 9. 0439e 6�5' C. SERVICES 2,160 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 12,960 55 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 550 1,900 Lin.ft. 1" Type A" copper water service @ $7.00/lin.ft. 13,300 130 Lin.ft. 4" DIP Water services @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,300 65 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water services @ $12.00/lin.ft. 780 39 Each 1" Corporation stop in place @ $40.00/each 1,560 2 Each 1644" tee in place @ $800.00/each 1,600 1 Each 1646" tee in place @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 39 Each 1" Curb stop and box in pl. @ $80.00/each 3,120 2 Each 4" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $300.00/each 600 1 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 350 ® 2,215 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,215 Total $ 39,335 +5% Contingencies 1,965 $ 41,300 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,330 TOTAL SERVICES ................................... $ 51,630 D. STORM SEWER 880 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lin.ft. $ 29,920 380 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 11,400 620 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 16,120 • 120 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,880 140 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,080 6 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 5,700 9 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 7,200 1 Each 27" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 4 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 240 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,000 2,140 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,140 Total $ 80,480 +5% Contingencies 4,020 $ 84,500 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 21,130 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $105;630 Page 9. 0439e 6�5' APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 (1) N.P. = Northview Park Page 11. 0439e �� A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Total Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 11 $1,672 $ 18,388 • Lot 1-19, Block 2 19 1,672 31,761 SECTION 23, NW 1/4 Parcel 014-26 6 lot equiv. $1,672 $ 10,029 Northview Park .1 1,672 1,672 37 $ 61,850 B. WATER MAIN a.) Trunk Area Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (ac.) (ac.) Area (ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION 23 ® Parcel 012-26 (N.P.)(1) 9.0 Street 20% 7.2 $1,190/ac. $ 8,568 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 7.5 Street 20% 6 $1,190/ac. 7,140 Parcel 010-04 7.5 Street 20% 6 1,190/ac. 7,140 SW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 012-52 N.P.)(1) 29.8 Pond 2.1 ac. Street 20% 22.2 $1,190/ac. $ 26,418 Parcel 013-52 (N.P.)(1) 10.0 Street 20% 8.0 1,190/ac. 9,520 BE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 19.8 Street 20% 15.8 $1,190/ac. $ 18,802 Parcel 010-78 19.8 Street 20% 15.8 1,190/ac. 18,802 $ 96,390 (1) N.P. = Northview Park Page 11. 0439e �� b.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Front Description Footage LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-11 906.39 Block 2, Lots 1-19 1455 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 Northview Park 2107.16 NN 1/4, SECTION 23 -- 2107.16 Assessable No. Total Credit Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment -- 906.39 $11.88 $ 10,768 -- 1455 11.88 17,285 -- 147.87 11.88 1,757 -- 2107.16 11.88 25,033 Parcel 014-26 547 -- 547 $11.88 Total 5163.42 c.) Lateral (6" Lateral on Clinton 'Trail S Savannah Road) Parcel Description LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, 2, 3 C. SERVICES Parcel No. of Description Services LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION B ock , Lots - 11 Res.(1) Block 2, Lots 1-19 19 Res.(1) Block 3, Lots 1-3 3 Res.(1) NORTHVIEW PARK Sanitary Sewer 1 - 6" Water Main 2 - 4" NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 6 Res.(1) Parcel 014-26 1 - 6" Total (1) Residential Service = 4" Sewer and 1" Water. Page 12. 0439e �� Lump Sum $ 6,550 Cost/Service $ 722 4,593 $ 998 2,796 $ 6,498 $ 61,341 Total Assessment $ 6,550 Total Assessment $ 10,979 18,964 2,994 $ 722 9,186 $ 5,989 2,796 $ 51,630 Page 13. 0439e 67 D. STORM SEWER (Lateral) Parcel Front Total Description Footage Rate/FF Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, lots 1-19 906.39 $20.46 $ 18,542 Block 2, Lots 1-11 1,455 20.46 29,765 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 20.46 3,025 NORTHVIEW PARK 2-,107.16 20.46 43,108 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 20.46 11,190 Total 5,163.42 $105,630 • E. STREET a.) Northview Park Road Parcel Total Description Front Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-19 906.39 $33.75 $ 30,591 Block 2, Lots 1-11 1455 33.75 49,106 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 33.75 4,991 Northview Park 2107.16 $33.75 $ 71,117 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 $33.75 18,461 Total 5163.42 $174,266 ® b.) Clinton Trail and Savannah Road Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment Lexington Square 6th .Addition $15,900 $ 15,900 C.) Bituminous Trail Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment Lexington Square 6th Addition $24,340 $ 24,340 Page 13. 0439e 67 Sanitary Parcel Sewer Description Lateral LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 $ 1,672 Lot 1-19, Block 2 1,672 � Lot 1-3, Block 3 --- C NORTHVIEW PARK $ 1,672 Parcel 012-26, 013-52, 012-52, 020-54, Part of 014-26) NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4., SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 010-78 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Part of Parcel 014-26 $10.029 TOTALS $61,850 0439e SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 COST/LOT, PARCEL Storm Water Main Sewer Trunk Lateral Services Lateral Total Street Assessment $ 1,102 $ 998 $ 1,556 $ 3,786 $ 9,114 1,102 998 1,556 3,786 9,114 1,102 998 1,556 3,786 7,442 $44,506 $25,033 $ 9,908 $ 43,108 $ 71,117 $195,344 $ 7,140 7,140 $18,802 18,802 $ 6,498 $ 8,785 $96,390 $67,891 $51,630 Page .14. $ 7,140 7,140 $ 18,802 18,802 $ 11,192 $ 18,461 $ 54,965 $105,630 $214,506 $597,897 • • � g�J a o� M N MI avouH"Vnvs ---� I n1vU1 LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA eva 133HIS 38nln! BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDEkUK Se ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1988 Comm. 49405 l'I Fig. No. 1 avc 8^J J s a!u IMLL LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA m BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1886 Comm. 48405 Fig. No. 2 L E I.l z O r z_ X W J (NORTHUIEW PARK ROAD) TRUNK AREA WATER ASSESSMENT AREA PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers to Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1888 Comm. 49405 FFIg NO. 3 avoa Nvmlo\vs a z w W N a J Q W J '1Ivul ice= LLI � T 1: LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1986 Comm. 49405 Fig. No. 4 I 1 r A \ I I N \ 1 1 I II 1 + 1~ilo I M/U 133HL5 '3Uf11nd �p , N¢ ¢ 1 3 Y e 4 uw 6 V 01 OI W 1 i LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1986 Comm. 49405 Fig. No. 4 • • 81p W -o M©� aVatl H"W%VS 0 R 1Po81 i e � Ili � 7 I m rd LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA E BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1988 Comm. 49405 FICJ. NO. 5 ` � 3 W H Q `l p N W 41 �J LI MAI 1338, 3unln.4 a a =J Q Y, N _ l•1 � O W u � J LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA E BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1988 Comm. 49405 FICJ. NO. 5 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, 'City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One ADOPTION 1987 GENERAL AND UTILITY FUND A. Proposed Adoption of 1987 General &Utility Fund Budget --Several special meetings of the City Council were held from August through November to discuss, review and determine the 1987 Operating Budget for both general fund activities and the utility funds. The total budget for general fund is $7,389,630. The property tax levy that was certified at the first meeting in October will reflect a small mill rate decrease for next year despite an increase in the operating budget.. With the increased assessed valuation, the City is able to increase its budget, meet its local service delivery needs and lower the mill rate by a small adjustment. The total utility budget or enterprise fund for 1987 is $3,142,540 which includes water, sewer and residential street lights. There is no property tax required for the public enterprise funds. All workshop sessions to determine the 1987 budget were special City Council meetings open to the public. There was a public hearing held on September 16 at a regular City Council meeting to present the proposed General Fund budget. There was also discussion regarding the proposed General Fund budget at the October 7 regular City Council meeting at the time the mill levy was certified for collection in 1987. The operating budget was covered by local reporters and discussed as a topic on the Eagan Report as apart of our local access for Group W cable. • Enclosed are copies of summary sheets for the 1987 General and Utility Fund Budget found on pages through 7.,- Once the budget is officially adopted by the City Council, all data including a narrative will be prepared and distributed for City •Council and Departmental use. A copy is always available for public inspection at the library and City Hall facilities. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 1987 General and Utility Fund Budget as presented. iA, GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUE Description General Property Taxes Licences ® Permits Intergovernmental Revenue Charges for Services Recreation Charges Fines & Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenues Refunds & Reimbursements Transfers TOTAL GENERAL FUND • Actual Actual Budget Budget 1984 ------------ 1985 ------------ 1986 =----------- 1987 ------------ $ 2,542,723 $ 2,738,983 $ 3,161,450 $ 3,988,600 55,386 66,169 59,030 68,140 435,469 914,181 677,850 783,120 904,463 1,045,325 1,194,800 1,312,670 209,096 471,380 496,380 '434,400 38,222 47,760 39,230 56,750 78,008 92,560 90,000 95,000 58,375 145,247 50,660 73,900 388,295 526,303 430,600 479,050 0 0 0 98,000 $ 4,710,037 $ 6,047,908 $ 6,200,000 $ 7,389,630 ---------------=------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------- �7 GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Actual Actual 1984 1985 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 01 Mayor & Council 02 Administration 03 Data Processing 05 Finance/Clerk/Elections 06 Legal 08 Planning & Zoning 09 General Gov't Buildings 10 Cable TV PUBLIC SAFETY. 11 Police 12 Fire 13 Protective Inspections 15 Civil Defense 16 Ambulance Service PUBLIC WORKS 21 Public Works Engineering 22 Streets & Highways PARKS & RECREATION 31 Parks & Recreation 32 Tree Conservation OTHER 41 Contingency $ . 43,590 199,512 0 344,978 101,971 93,925 80,848 0 $ 864,824 $ 1.,579,156' 266,539 208,657 7,248 28,373 ------------ $ 2,089,973 $ 319,777 534,027 ------------ $ 853,804 $ 475,062 27,274 --- $ 502,336 ----------- 0 $---------o $ 35,176 340,710 0 393,172 129,628 111,700 94,405 0 $ 1,104,791 $ 1,687,070 318,059 276,692 10,066 33,088 $ 2,324,975 $ 324,098 701,015 ------------ $ 1,0259113 ------------ $ 654,589 40,287 ------------ $ 694,876 ----------- 0 $---------o Budget 1986 ------------ $ 35,460 258,120 0 456,350 130,000 174,870 89,020 68,550 $ 1,212,370 $ 1,948,980 351,770 410,300 7,060 37,920 $ 2,756,030 $ 403,120 930,370 $ 19333,490 $ 761,710 53,450 ------------ $ 815,160 $ 82,950 $ 82,950 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 4,310,937 $ 5,149,755 $ 6,200,000 6$ Budget 1987 $ 48,280 321,050 135,040 429,370 175,000 212,490 139,200 98,150 $-1,558,580- • $ 2,128,850 518,130 451,540 7,690 0 $ 3,106,210 $ 386,010 1,186,100 ------------ $ 1,572,110_®' $ 963,710 74,600 ------------ $ 1,038,310 $ 114,420 ------------ $ 114,420 $ 7,3899630 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES TOTAL OPERATING $2,243,190 $2,902,886 $2,639,630 $2,3239048 $3,264.100 REVENUES ------------------------ 6 ACTUAL, ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED 1984 1985 1986 9/30/86 1,987 OPERATING REVENUES: 61 WATER Service Charges $1,603,927 $1,259,675 $1,100,000 $ 995,270 $1,400,000 Connection Permits 69590 11,525 8,000 9,860 8,000 Penalties 9,260, 13,166 11,000 9,511 14,000 Sale of Materials and Meter Charges 52,201 100,335 64,000 89,445 92,000 • Other 37,240 8,491 4,1550 12,901 9,700 TOTAL $1,109,218 $1,393,192 $1,187,550 $1,116,987 $1,523,700 62 SEWER Service Charges $1,383,318 $1,447,547 $1,400,000$1,152,182 $1,650,000 Connection Permits 90822 11,630 8,000 9,880 8,000 Penalties 13,803 19,749 14,000 12,704 16,500 Other 1,764 2,185 580 1,315 700 TOTAL $19408,707 $1,481,111 $1,422,580 $1,176,081 $1,675,200 • 63 STREET LIGHTING Service Charges $18,345 $28,583 $29,500 $29j980 $65,200 TOTAL $15,600 $28,583 $29,500 $29,980 $65,200 TOTAL OPERATING $2,243,190 $2,902,886 $2,639,630 $2,3239048 $3,264.100 REVENUES ------------------------ 6 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED 1984 1985 1986 9/30/86 1987 NON-OPERATING REVENUES: $447,254 $1,137,438 $313,500 $720,270 $420,000 Special Assessments Interest $3,041 $2,215 $1,000 $6,704 $7,300 Interest on Investments 392,031 572,513 300,000 --- 450,000 Interest on Current Value and Debt Service Credit 35,249 33,139 30,,000 --- 299000 Sale at City Property 3,945 1,600 --- --- Connection Charges 447,254 1,137,438 313,500 720,270 420,000 Connection Charge Water Treatment Plant --- 370,260 124,800 249,336 140,400 • TOTAL NON-OPERATING 441,594 259,465 100,000 --- 250,000 REVENUES $8819520 $2,1179165 $769,300 $976,310 $1,046,700 GRAND TOTAL REVENUES $3,417,790 ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- $5,020,051 $3,408,930 $392999358 $4,310,800 DEDICATED REVENUES - NOT AVAILABLE FOR OPERATIONS Connection Charges $447,254 $1,137,438 $313,500 $720,270 $420,000 Water Treatment Plant Debt Service Surcharge 184,271 278,528 197,170 248,077 250,000 Connection Charges --- 370,260 124,800 249,336 140,400 Water System Renewal and Replacement 95,481 122,792 1.20,480 103,994 115,570 Sewer System Renewal and Replacement 88092 93,630 76,440 69,579 85,910 Interest Earnings: Water Treatment Plant D.S. 441,594 259,465 100,000 --- 250,000 Water System Renewal and Replacement 61,408 66,683 50,770 --- 70,000 Sewer System Renewal and Replacement 68,426 73,098 57,460 --- 75,000 Municipal Center Expansion 128,000 100,000 --- 79,400 $1,386,826 $2,529,894 $1,040,620 $1,391,256 $1,486,280 ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 79 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENSES • Total Excluding Depreciation Expense $622,280 $1,180,440 $1,286,400 $810,869 $1,333,510 Depreciation Expense 272,575 331,625 310,000 --- 360,000 Total Including ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED Depreciation Expense 1984 1985 1986 9-30-86 1987 61 WATER Personal Services $163,026 $203,043 $226,100 $165,314 $275,450 Supplies, Repairs, and Maintenance 47,997 70,257 68,780 47,100 73,510 Other Services and 117,030 108,971 137,490 83,600 129,490 Charges 411,257 907,140 991,520 598,455 984,550 • Total Excluding Depreciation Expense $622,280 $1,180,440 $1,286,400 $810,869 $1,333,510 Depreciation Expense 272,575 331,625 310,000 --- 360,000 Total Including Depreciation Expense $894,855 $1„5129065 $1,596,400 $8109869 $1,693,510 62 SEWER Personal Services $20,210 $35,832 $66,120 $41,586 $82,790 Supplies, Repairs, and Maintenance 79338 9,827 13,150 109696 14,240 ®Other Services and Charges 117,030 108,971 137,490 83,600 129,490 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Charges 892,107 972,670 1,191,120 787,173 1,168,230 Total Excluding Depreciation Expease,$1,036,685 $1,127,300 $1,408,080 $923,055 $19394,750 Depreciation Expense 223,791 322,204 275,000 --- 350,000 Total Including Depreciation Expense $1,260,471 $1p449,504 $1,6839080 $923,055 $1,744,750 63 STREET LIGHTING Other Services and Charges Total Excluding Depreciation Expense Depreciation Expense ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED 1984 1985 1986 9-30-86 1987 $22,473 $28,347 $29,500 $24,261 $53,500 $22,473 $28,347 $29,500 $24,261 $53,500 Total Including Depreciation Expense $22,473 $28,347 $29,500 $24,261 $53,500 • Total Operating Expenses Excluding Depreciation Expense $1,681,438 $2,336087 $2,723,980 $1,758,185 $2,781,760 Total Depreciation Expense 496,369 653,829 585,000 — 7109000 Total Operating Expenses Including Depreciation Expense $29177,807 $2,989,916 $3,308,980 $19758,185 $3,491,760 NON-OPERATING EXPENSES Interest Expense on MWCC $12,844 $10,504 $11,000 $5,882 $11,000 Total Operating and = Non -Operating Expenses Including Depreciation $2,190,651 $3,000,420 $3,3199980 $1,764,067 $3,502,760 7v Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Two Memo City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT SPLIT IN RAHN RIDGE A. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace,) to Split a Duplex on Lot 3, Block 4, Rahn Ridge, Located East of Nicols Road Abutting Vienna Lane --An application was submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting a waiver of plat for Lot 3, Block 4, in the Rahn Ridge Addition. For additional information regarding, the waiver, refer to page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application as presented for a waiver of plat by B. H. Grace Corporation. • • 73 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: B. H. GRACE CORPORATION LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: • LOT 3, BLOCK 4, RAHN RIDGE ADDITION R-2, WITHIN MISSION HILLS P.D. (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) (77-1) DECEMBER 16, 1986 DECEMBER 8, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting a Waiver of Plat for Lot 3, Block 4 in the Rahn Ridge Addition. All 25 duplex lots meet or exceed-Ehe 15,000 sq. ft. per lot and the 100' width. This duplex [leets Code. setback requirements and has separate utilities _serviced by Vienna Lane. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all applicable Code Requirements. I L J 1 + RAHN a 1 j i IA U a RAHN RIDGE ROAD 1 9 ' l VIENNA �' ° _ r LANE 2: �� l - RAI. T.R. �• .•1! JF. a W 0 "2 •r-• :, A. w••t9 •aDMV -..��-i::. C :('� - "- __nom_ t+•�! f' �• .. �: tit. yr ? to /!til rA dt .. •} t�i8s , 4.jt'• r. .. ,•K, '' q tel` ty;t 'Q', --• 1 9 ' l VIENNA �' ° _ r LANE 2: �� l - RAI. T.R. �• .•1! JF. a W 0 "2 •r-• :, .__w! __ __nom_ .a+' '_'_ten. __ •rrt-. \. . 1 f 1 9 ' l VIENNA �' ° _ r LANE 2: �� l - RAI. T.R. �• .•1! JF. a W 0 "2 •r-• :, Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Three Memo City Council Meeting 1987 LIQUOR LICENSE/EAGANDALE CLUB B. 1987 Liquor License for Eagandale Club --According to the City Clerk's office, the Eagandale Club is delinquent in property tax payments to the County. According Chapter 5, Section 5.04, of the Eagan City Code, "No license under this Chapter shall be granted for operation on any premises upon which taxes, assess- ments, or installments thereof, or other financial claims of the City, are owed by the applicant and are delinquent and unpaid. For the purpose of this section, "applicant" includes persons and related persons...". It was therefore the opinion of the City Clerk and City Administrator that the on -sale liquor license for the Eagandale Club should not be renewed in 1987 unless property taxes were paid in full. The Eaganaale Club was placed on notice of this proposed action and contact was made by the Eagandale Club's legal counsel regarding the issue. Mr. Richard Nadler of Richard Nadler and Associates, legal counsel for the Eagandale Club, is suggesting that due to bankruptcy proceedings and the court's desire to keep the Eagandale Club operational, the requirement to pay property tax is stayed by the nature of the proceedings. Please refer to a letter and notice of the bankruptcy case which is enclosed on pages 7/„ through %% . Under the circumstances, it may be in the best interest of the City, recognizing the bankruptcy proceedings, that the Eagandale Club be allowed to continued operating as a full-service club with the on -sale liquor license. The City Attorney is reviewing the mat -ter and will provide additional comment at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the ®Eagandale Club a liquor license in 1987 recognizing that a section of the City Code has been violated by non-payment of property tax,; however, further recognizing that the club is experiencing a bankruptcy proceeding at the present time. E Richard G. Nadler & Associates Attorneys At Law December 4, 198'6 Tom Hedges, City Manager City of Eagan 3838 Piolot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Eagandale Indoor Tennis Partnership Chapter 11 Case No. 3-86-2609 Dear Mr. Hedges: Please be advised that I represent the above-named who filed a Chapter 11 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court, St. Paul, Minnesota on September 29, 1966. My client advises me that since .the filing of that petition it has been advised by you that the liquor license in the premises would not be renewed as a result of back taxes due to the state of Minnesota. The refusal to renew my client's liquor license as a result of unpaid real estate, sales or withholding taxes due to the state, city or county which are prepetition taxes, violates Section 362 and Section 525 of/the Bankruptcy Code. In a recent case In re Blarney, Inc., 53 B.R. 162 (Bkrtcy. 1985) the Honorable Margaret A. Mahoney, United States Bankruptcy Court Judge, District of Minnesota granted an injunction against the City of St. Paul from refusing to renew the liquor license of a restaurant and bar for similar reasons. A copy of that decision is enclosed. Please review this and advise me within the next five days that the City Council is going to renew the liquor license baspd upon this federal law. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation on this. Zincere Richard N,adler RGN:mlb cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Graham Gurr ,..... _ �„�l,lin�• �� r,,i;,,• 4trret� St. Paul R9in,;,,_:.,i.� ::6�n, � :r.,,, ��: U. S. BANKRUPTCY COURT( NOTICE OF CHAPTER 11 BAIrfQ2UPTCY CASE, DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MEETING OF CREDITORS, AUTCMATIC,STAY 627 U.S. Courthouse TIME FINED TO FILE CIAIMS, BRC. 316 No. Robert Street Bankruptcy Case NtRmber: BKY 3-86-2609 St. Paul, MN 55101 In re: EAGANDALE IP:DOOR TENNIS PARTNERS (a limited Iv---tnership) d/b/a The Eagandale Club Debtor: Federal Tax I.D.No. Fed. I.U. No. 41-1300013, MN I.D. Ivo. 5238806 NOTICE is hereby given to the debtor, creditors, and other parties in interest, that: - 1. PETITION: ATTORNEY An order for relief urder 11 U.S.C. Chap 11 has been entered on a petition filed on Seotenber 29, 1986 by the debtor named above, of 3330 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan., MN 55121. The attorney for the debtor is Pichard G. Nadler, 510 Degree of Honor BuildirG , St. Paul, MN 55101. L. AUTCMATIC STAY As a result of th_ e filing of the petition ccmnencirg this case, certain acts and proceedings against the debtor, property of the deb*.or and property 01 - the estate are stave as provided in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362(a). 3. STATUS OF DEBTOR Debtor is the debtor in possession and thereby has certain rigrits, powers and cuties of a trustee under 11 U.S.C. §1201 and 1107.Debtor has the exclusive. right for 120 days to file a plan, unless a trustee is appointed, but if 6ebtor does not file a. pian within that time, and the court does not extend such tire. then any party in interest may file a plan, under U.S.C. §1121. 4. PROOFS OF CLAIM To vote or, a plan or receive distribution under a plan, a creditor must file a proof of claim with the clerk of this court on an official form prescribed for a proof of claim. Subject to Local Rule 124, the date a plan is ccnfisred or the 90th day after the date below set for the meeting of creditors, whichever occurss later, has been fixed as the last day to timely file.a proof of claim in this case. Proofs of claim received after such date will be filed as claims tardily filed without purer to vote under 11 U.S.C. §1126 and without distribution under 11 U.S.C. §1142 and 1143 except as provided by law. Certain claire, listed in the schedules filed by or for the debtor for amcunts stated as not disputed, contingent or unliquidated, are deemed filed as proofs of claim under 11 U.S.C. §1111. However, to avoid uncertainty or misinformation, every creditor should promptly file its own proof of claim, which then supersedes the scheduled claim if any. P_ claim form is provided on reverse side of this notice. 5. M=TING OF CREDITOR: AGENDA On November 24, 1986, at 1:00 P.M., in 535 U.S Ecirtltcluse, 110 South Fcurtl: Street, Mirmeapg is, i•uq 55401, a meeting of creditors will be held pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §341(a). The debtor shall appear by its president or other executive officer, if the debtor is a corporation, or by a ' general partner, if the debtor is a partnership, at that time amu', place, for the States purpose of being examined. Attendance at this reeting by creditors or other parties in interest is welcome but not required. The United States Trustee, or his desicnee, John A. Hedback, Attornev, shall preside at the meeting. Creditors may examine the debtor and transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, which may be continued or adjourned from time, to time by notice, at the meeting without further written notice to cre6itors. 6. PROOFS OF INTEREST If the debtor is a. corporation or limritcd partnership, a proof of interest may but need not be filed by any shareholder or other equity security holder of the debtor under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1111 and applicable rules. A proof of claim form should not be used for this puiluse. DATED: October 22, 1986 TD'011iY R. ;TSBRIDGE, Clerk PROOF OP CZAR+, FORM 01' REVERSE S771,E United States Bankruptcy Ccurt SCL RULE A PAGES SLH DULE B PAGES (i''L i L! V L U , .v i 19b 11IC-T206 s. .77 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four PRELIMINARY PLAT/NORTHWEST AEROSPACE TRAINING CORPORATION LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION C. Preliminary Plat (Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation) for Lone Oak 2nd Addition Consisting of a Flight Simulator Training Facility --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their November 25, 1986, meeting to consider a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 82 acres and entitled Lone Oak 2nd Addition. It was noted at the APC meeting that Northwest Airlines had already received grading permits and foundation permits from the City Council to start construction of the training facility. It was also noted that the footprint of the building is approximately 103,600 square feet. After • further review, the APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning ann?dd�� Engineering Departments' report found on pages through —�' The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at its December 4 Commission meeting is recommending a cash dedication according to the City's commercial and industrial cash dedication require- ment. For additional information on this item, refer to the APC minutes; a copy is enclosedon pages -FZ-through 41�. A request was presented to the City by M.A. Mortenson Company, asking that the City allow erection of the steel superstructure ® prior to final plat approval. Please refer to the attached letter found on pages�_through _q� It has been City policy that no permits beyodd foundatidn permits be granted without final plat approval. The one exception was the United Parcel Service building. The City staff has concerns about granting any building permits prior to final plat approval recognizing that the incentive to complete the development agreement and all final plat application material is lost once the developer begins construction. If the superstructure is allowed, it must be contingent upon no further construction being allowed until the final plat is approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) Approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Lone Oak 2nd Addition and 2) approve or deny the erection of the steel superstructure prior to issuance of a final plat. (l CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: NORTHWEST AIRLINES LOCATION: OUTLOT "M" LONE OAK ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1986 REPORTED. BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING ® APPLICATION: An applibation has been submitted by Northwest Airlines requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. This plat, on Outlot M of the 1st Addition, consists of 1 lot and 2 outlots, totaling 82.3 acres. Lot 1 will be the 103,668 Sq. ft. Northwest Aerospace Training Facility. The Lone Oak P.D. was approved in March 1984. Outlot M was designated for Northwest Airlines' future development, therefore, the use is consistent with the P.D. exhibit.. COMMENTS: The site plan for this project was reviewed in detail prior to the issuance of a .grading permit in October 1986. All Code requirements had been satisfied. At that time, the entire. 82.3 acre parcel was to be platted into a single lot. Since then, the applicant has chosen to plat only the area needed for the Aerospace building and leave the remaining area as outlots. Outlot A, 15.15 acres, .will basically provide access from the Owest. Outlot B, 26.74 acres, abuts O'Neill Drive to the north and. will be capable of accommodating another significant building. The Aerospace Facility -and parking setbacks still meet Code require- ments as the site plan itself has not been. changed. 341 parking stalls will be provided in, 2 separate lots. 553 parking spaces would be necessary in strict office 'designated areas. Since this Aerospace building is a' 24 hour facility and for a specific user group, the parking appears sufficient. Parking and building expansion areas have been provided, both meeting Code requirements. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The required site grading for Lot 1, Block 1, of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The first phase has already begun under the authority of Grading Permit #EX 01-216, issued by Council action on October 7,' 1986. Because the second phase involves encroachment into Eagan Pond FP -4 (DNR Wetland #250W), a DNR permit will be required before this second phase can be initiated. Generally, all drainage generated from this facility will be directed :into this large wetland, with the exception of the extreme southeast corner, which will be directed into a newly created LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 j PAGE TWO ponding area. Pond FP -4 is presently receiving runoff from Ponds FP -5 and 11, with no downstream outlet currently available. Figure 1 shows the relationship of this property to the existing and proposed future storm water system requirements. The outlet for Pond FP -4 will be southwesterly to Pond FP -7, which has a positive outlet down to the Minnesota River. Extensive erosion control measures will have to be established to minimize the impact into these City and DNR protected wetlands as well as adjacent private property. The grading plan previously submitted and approved shows no slope steeper than 3:1 and no encroachment on private property. However, the proposed grading plan does encroach into the required storm water storage capacity as identified on the City's Comprehensive Master Plan. Either this Master Plan or the proposed grading plan will have to be revised to provide the required storage volume for storm water runoff in this portion of District "F". UTILITIES: Neither sanitary sewer nor water main facilities are immediately available to allow the development of this facility. An internal lateral sanitary sewer presently exists within the boundaries of Lot 11 Block 1, of this proposed development. However, this sanitary sewer does not connect to downstream facilities and was constructed prematurely as a part of the lst Addition grading and development schedule. Therefore, it will be necessary to extend this existing sanitary sewer lateral southwesterly to the future Lone Oak Drive thence westerly to the existing trunk facility adjacent to T.H. 55/149 intersection. In addition, an B" sanitary lateral will have to be constructed to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, to provide future service for unplatted parcel 010-29, located south of O'Neill Drive and north of the existing Northwest Airlines Corporate Headquarters. Figure 2 shows the relationship of the existing and required trunk sanitary sewer facilities. The completion of the trunk water main system, in accordance with the City's Master Plan for this area, eventually requires the looped connection from Lone Oak Road up to O'Neill Drive through this. proposed development. Figure 3 shows the relationship and proposed trunk water main necessary to service the ultimate development in this section of the City. As a result of a detailed analysis evaluating elevations and required fire flows, the northerly portion of the 12" water main will have to be installed along O'Neill Drive to this development with an 8" connection to the existing loop around the N.W. Airline Corporate Headquarters to the west. The completion of this 12" trunk water main loop to Lone Oak Road will not be necessary until that property develops. The alignment of this southwesterly extension to Lone Oak Road is dependent upon a conceptual layout of the future development south of this proposed Lone Oak -.2nd Addition. OA LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE In order to provide sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facilities to allow the development of this proposal, it will require the developer's financial commitment or authorization by Council action for the installation of these trunk facilities through adjacent property. Internal lateral utilities, whether installed privately or under a City contract, must be in conformance with City approved engineering standards and specifications. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to Lot 1, Block 1, will be obtained through the construction of an internal private street constructed to City standards from O'Neill Drive along the northwesterly edge of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. A secondary access to the Northwest Airlines Corporate Headquarter parking lot will be provided to the west. However, the final street configuration is dependent upon the approval of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) due to the fill required within or adjacent to DNR Protected Wetland #250W. • With O'Neill Drive being the only primary access to this facility, it will be necessary to complete the upgrading of this street. Presently, the easterly access to Delaware Avenue in Mendota Heights and the westerly access to T.H. 149 have been completed as a part of the upgrading of I-494. The completion of the middle section of O'Neill Drive to City standards should be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Due.to the requirements of extending trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and improving O'Neill Drive to City standards impacting properties adjacent to and beyond this development to provide service to this proposed facility, it will be necessary to ensure that -all permanent and temporary construction easements will be made available prior to construction initiation. Therefore, it will be necessary to have ® this development responsible for the acquisition of all required easements or a financial escrow to cover all anticipated costs associated with acquisition through adverse condemnation. It will be necessary to acquire all Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permits prior to final plat approval. The acquisitipn of the required Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Metropolitan Waste Water Control Commission (MWCC) and Department of Health sewer and water extension permits will be required prior to the issuance of a utility construction permit. An MPCA Indirect Source Permit will also be required prior to final plat approval. Ponding easements of sufficient configuration shall be dedicated as required by City staff to incorporate the necessary storm water storage volumes for Ponds FP -4, 41 and 11 and shall be shown on the final plat. All internal public utilities shall have permanent utility easements dedicated of sufficient width depending upon the final alignment and depth. J LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE FOUR ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer has been previously assessed over all portions proposed to be included in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. No further assessments are associated with trunk area sanitary sewer. Trunk area storm sewer was assessed over that portion lying within the west half of Section 1 (Outlot A). Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B have not yet been assessed for trunk area storm sewer -improvements. With the required trunk area storm sewer facilities necessary to service this deveelopment, it will be required to have this development agree to those trunk area assessments through the Development Contract. In addition, trunk area water, assessments have not yet been levied due to the lack of trunk water main facilities in this general area. As a condition of final plat approval, it will be necessary to have this development agree to these related trunk area water O assessments. A portion of O'Neill Drive has already been upgraded to City standards near the northeast corner of this proposed subdivision. All assessments associated with this improvement performed by MnDOT and the future improvement of O'Neill Drive required with this final plat shall. be the responsibility of the developer for its respresentative frontage. All trunk area assessment obligations shall be in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and provide credit for the required dedicated ponding easements. These assessment obligations are estimated with 1986 rates as follows: Final quantities will be calculated based on final plat dimensions. Project Item Quantity Rate Amount Code # Trunk Area Storm Sewer 43.0 Ac. $ 0.075/sf $140,481.00 302 Trunk Area Water 58.14 Ac. $ 3,020/ac $175,583.00 O'Neill Dr. 1070 LF $ 78.45/lf $ 83,950.00 Final quantities will be calculated based on final plat dimensions. -LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION PAGE FIVE CONDITIONS: LONE OAR 2ND ADDITION 1. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and the upgrading of O'Neill Drive to City standards shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The acquisition of an MPCA Indirect Source Permit shall be required prior to final plat approval. 3. Ponding easements incorporating the required storm water capacity shall be dedicated with the final plat. 4. This development shall be responsible for providing the necessary easements for the construction of O'Neill Drive and the required sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer facilities prior to final plat approval. If they cannot be provided, the developer shall be financially responsibile for all costs associated with the City's acquisition of both permanent and temporary construction easements for these public improvements. 5. The developer shall obtain all required DNR permits prior to final plat approval. 6. All internal utility and drainage easements necessary to incorporate public improvements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 7. All public improvements constructed within this development, whether performed privately or under City contract, shall be in conformance with City approved engineering standards. 8. The development shall be financially responsible for its proportionate share of the assessments associated with the development of this property. 9. The grading plan or the Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan shall be revised to accommodate_ the proposed surface water runoff associated with this development prior to final plat approval. 10. All existing drainage and utility easements required to be vacated shall be approved prior to the release of the plat for recording at the County. 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submision. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. % A.EkE'YY I_AQ Ik ...... A. Pa O. '471 v 3M k�. L AHD,,DEVEL NORTHWE Pease 9, a I RES 1 3wll 2N�rT U zt:; WA• CDTA'WAE 'E HETAfL/ TE GENMAA� NTiAL I EVELOPME FFICE FF1C& IRESEARCK ---------- Laukka -Beck Phapot i3:1 "AETA1000F CEi t Site Concept Plan C OFFICE 0 OM TOTAL SITE AREA A92.0 A % 4: - crk-,-) NORTHWEST AIRLINES -4 .. "I SHOWROOM —- - — — 1511A A DEV p 4 A �RESEARCII& -DEVELOPMENT,- TOTAL PUBLIC ROADWAYS 29,2 A PUBLIC ROADWAYS NORTHWEST AIRLINES 3.1 A Pnae OFFIrE/SHOWR8OMPH4SE5 PUUUC ROADWAYS LAUKKA-BECK 26.2 A P. 'RESEARCH & "ADEVELOPMENT— "OFFICE/RETAM, k —I IN', NN...:1._WAA ...'RESEARCH & -------- 21,1 c—P, 00 EVEL PMENT RESEARCH ULVLL 4 Pm.. 3 ow OFFICE E. OFFICE/ % SHOWROOM'..�a - i M 9.WH�°PE."R.'9.4e""�'ir'r•mo :RESEARCH P. ENT, 0 FIC E/SHOWROOIA RESEARCH III DEVEII,OPMENT1. j 411 Ail Ph... 5 .......... .. LmmP OA A I �' iIt � __ a I: ; J ; `\♦`` Il �! � 1 \ O 11 'ti'\I, iii ```I `: �`. � �' ! � -'- �.' I S - pi�' •' i-�-- `� i��a fii I I �qn\\` 1 \. .C�`\fl• /1\♦\�-^. \. ! �`\ I ; �' , / � .' i : •�� l j I 'Iii -- ` f y 1 '1d' �' S t VIE ' • "�� / /�I�\.\ \ �� / ; ! r I I ! i I 1 I I P� �� B / %/gyp-- I ' `-------^ -\ \I ` ` \ \\\ �-.. � h/l'l ; \ ``It '/III O' 6 i \ I 1 I I I . / �• / p // � � I / �- �' � �/i,u�J� 11111-\� . !-- - � f • 11\-'/ /ill) 11 ' 1 i I j II SII '1 ;�1-�11 .11 1' //i, �/ �`:;�__r_ u i NOf rHWE3i AEh"ACE TRAWWU COFQ+OnAT10N �"uuu�=ii.i%1.• �• y.l + II '/ NWA IM.• Wodd H,,dpuam . i.y , Mmnewl. SS121 I I'll q p/ ' I \j `�a\` ` 'I -•♦♦ I �' iIt � __ a I: ; J ; `\♦`` Il �! � 1 \ O 11 'ti'\I, iii ```I `: �`. � �' ! � -'- �.' I S - pi�' •' i-�-- `� i��a fii I I �qn\\` 1 \. .C�`\fl• /1\♦\�-^. \. ! �`\ I ; �' , / � .' i : •�� l j I 'Iii -- ` f y 1 '1d' �' S t VIE ' • "�� / /�I�\.\ \ �� / ; ! r I I ! i I 1 I I P� �� B / %/gyp-- I ' `-------^ -\ \I ` ` \ \\\ �-.. � h/l'l ; \ ``It '/III O' 6 i \ I 1 I I I . / �• / p // � � I / �- �' � �/i,u�J� 11111-\� . !-- - � f • 11\-'/ /ill) 11 ' 1 i I j II SII '1 ;�1-�11 .11 1' //i, �/ �`:;�__r_ u i NOf rHWE3i AEh"ACE TRAWWU COFQ+OnAT10N �"uuu�=ii.i%1.• �• y.l + II '/ NWA IM.• Wodd H,,dpuam . i.y , Mmnewl. SS121 III I(f i it ii71 "' ••_•� •--••-• --. I1W1\R10d1JO�ONIMVy1 T7tlJSClf]M 147/A111110N �� ,j/,�-\ I ' 1, "1I � `. `::.`":,•_,-,, '.;\ Y Alil��iff Ili F 0 1' il�j ' i ' � _-_`�`;��\yyy..�i��1o�.`�✓ill ,j/,�-\ I ' 1, "1I � `. `::.`":,•_,-,, '.;\ • �- 111 ,1 •° a .SCC °f/,�tC ! 3 f"'., A �' t' a@e •i1lllll J e: i c4 - OMELL'S DRIVE "�+OlgO M' i0y Dot � . = ns•r •Mrons �^•• 7UBDNB 01D-20 M2 71 w.a C R �pNE OUTLOT M � 1.. cunffr A oUROT 0 O �NK mnmc mM•-• /--� 010-02• _ 43 oLMLOT M V ovnm D � r,wro•en .owr .r ... -. 1 X '.aov�u i.. r�ortOi //AAr�� oVRO " YOUTLOT 1 • IXlRQf O i - OVRDT E •'�_ • . ` 10' pt3F- olws OM L \ ounnry 12, , - olo-n o1o•aa 8 r _ ovnoY-� ` � � ; - oeo-Oe Donor x ' ; l • , 020-U .UTO ! 610 000- 5 00-00 -65 ON AK ROAD a (COUNTY ROAD Na 28) i O,1 - - EAaM MMES A ,wrur.u•..0 ...... ra. 1 EXISTING�-- PROPOSED • TRUNK SANITARY SEWER �orre Owl 2�'� Fm SUBJECT PARCEL FP -9 'FP -13 aSTO 891.2 890.0 LONE OAK 2nd :ADD. FIG. City of eagan approved: standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate WORKS DEPARTMENI MASTER PLAN II I f � 1 11 I L J y• .'� II'I:! I:I I- 30 a �. - «yI181\�I79 1J�::j:_(V K ($�NO21 \'_l.-. '� \ �'IX211 1 Wjp. _ _ p0{�I11 LONE_ K ROA TEMPORARY - — „_AUIITOR j N -DD --- 15 _ 80 2ki 12 \c �p \,u.s POSTAL tLM��WCC `uII�gam' SERVICE 85 I �\ ,f BURtjVIE iV rn RbR OA ; BZ ! PARK' JN � ��' \� 7LLN C N- Q j �NqA EI-- I I\ r I I I I z" �NrEq 1511 E \ o - I. IAiLL'F5' >cE l I N- T 193 \ - N -V rco 12" I �® I Q, ' N-JJ1 I nHER EAG4 I I i6pA iI N -EE ' 1211 ,,,M\R hYE ZI r1 5 ✓ / � �'\\� 'I I I . li - �� )) 4001TION WESCOTT I \. LONE OAK 2nd A[)D. SUBJECT PAROL FIG. #2 city Of e --Agan gan SANITA SEWER approved:- plate #tl PUBLIC WORKS MAST PLAN! DEPARTMENI� I i .GAN SUBJECT PARCEL LONE OAK 2nd ADD. FiG.s City Of eagan approved: standard PUBLIC. WATERED II WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT 4 APC Minutes November 25, 1986 LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT At 10:45 p.m., Chairperson McCrea convened the second hearing of the evening regarding Outlot M of: Lone Oak Addition. City Planner Runkle introduced the project and Mr. Jim Thorn, Vice 'President of Properties of Northwest Airlines, in regard to the request for preliminary plat for Lone Oak 2nd Addition, consisting of one lot and two outlots on Outlot M of Lone Oak 1st Addition. Mr. Thorn addressed questions in regard to the facilities and the 16 full -flight simulator bays costing $14 million each. Trygg moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and the upgrading of O'Neil Drive to City standards shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The acquisition of an MPCA Indirect Source Permit shall be required prior to final plat approval. 3. Ponding easements incorporating the required storm water capacity shall be dedicated with the final plat. 4. This development shall be responsible for providing the necessary easements for the construction of O'Neil Drive and the required sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer facilities prior to final plat approval. If they cannot be provided, the developer shall be financially responsible for all costs associated with the City's acquisition of both permanent and temporary construction easements for these public improvements. 5. The developer shall obtain all required DNR permits prior to final plat approval. 6. All internal utility and drainage easements necessary to incorporate public improvements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 7. All public improvements constructed within this development, whether performed privately or under City contract, shall be in conformance with City approved engineering standards. 8. The development shall be financially responsible for its proportionate share of the assessments associated with the development of this property. 9. The grading plan or the Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan shall be revised to accommodate the proposed surface water runoff associated with this development prior to final plat approval. 10. All existing drainage and utility easements required to be vacated shall be approved prior to the release of the plat for recording at the County. go APC Minutes November 25, 1986 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submission. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. All voted in favor except Harrison who abstained. PINECREST ADDITION -'PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 REZONING The hearing on the application of Huttner Construction for rezoning and preliminary plat of Pinecrest Addition was then convened. The rezoning request was to allow 7 agricultural acres to be rezoned R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat located south of Crestridge Lane, abutting Fish Lake Park. City Planner Runkle introduced the application and indicated that there was some disagreement as to the best alternative to a long cul-de-sac for this proposal. Issues raised at a, neighborhood meeting included the quality of storm water into Fish Lake, the length of the cul-de-sac, and the number of lots. Mr. Huttner was present and indicated that the homes to be built would be in the $120,000.00 to $160,000.00 range. Mr. Dale Nathan of 1308 Kolstad Lane appeared and stated he was in favor of the project without the alternative street hook-up to Kolstad Lane. Mr. Ed Kolstad of 1320 Kolstad Lane also expressed his being in favor of the project without the extension to Kolstad Lane. Discussion then centered around the alternatives to a long cul-de-sac and the need for park access to the peninsula south of the property. Mr. Colbert indicated that an easement for the park would be a condition of the plat. All lots exceeded 12,,000 square feet and the cul-de-sac would be 650 feet in length. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the request for rezoning and preliminary plat with a variance for the cul-de- sac. The stub street would not be required. The approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right-of-way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30 foot half right-of- way and this vacated right-of-way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right-of-way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. IM, 11 General Contractors Construction Managers M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY 700 Meadow Lane North PO. Box 710 December 11, 1986 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 612/522-2100 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation Building Permit Progress Dear Sir: As you may be aware, M.A. Mortenson Company is the general contractor for the new Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation (NATCO) project currently under construction at 2600 Lone Oak Point in Eagan. At this time, we have received a grading permit and a foundation permit from the City of Eagan for this project. We have attempted to make application for the Building Permit itself but have been told this is not permissable until the Final Plat for Lone Oak 2nd Addition has been approved. Under the very best circumstances February 1, 1987 is the earliest approximate date this could occur. Due to favorable weather and a timely delivery of fabricated materials we are coming .along well with the project and are meeting and exceeding our construction schedule. To date, approximately 1,800 tons of structural steel has been manufactured and partially fabricated for the NATCO building. We have begun receiving daily truck loads of structural steel which we are stockpiling on site. We would like to begin the erection of this steel approximately January 5, 1987. ®he purpose of this letter is to formally request from the City of Eagan, permission to begin the erection of the steel superstructure per the above schedule. In our conversations with Eagan building officials it has been recommended that we request this of the Eagan City Council since it is a departure from the typical permit process in your city. We would like to respectfully suggest options for your consideration which we have discussed with your building department staff: 1. Permission to work, including the erection of structural steel, under the present grading and foundation permits. The final Building Permit would be applied for immediately following Final Plat approval. 2. Issuance of another partial permit which would cover superstructure and enclosure work only. Again, the Building Permit would be applied for at the time of Final Plat approval. 3. Issuance of the actual Building Permit with the stipulation that it be revoked if approval of the Final Plat is not obtained for any reason. All permit costs and fees would be payable with the issuance of this permit. 9z Minnesota • R0cheste5 Mr. Thomas Hedges December 11, 1986 Page Two We ask the City Council to review this request at the regularly scheduled council meeting December 16. The Pre -Plat approval for Lone Oak 2nd Addition will also be reviewed at this time. Representatives from Northwest Airlines and M.A. Mortenson Company will be in attendance to answer any questions the council may have in respect to this request. We appreciate your consideration of this matter and we look forward to building another fine addition to your community. Yours truly, Mark Westin Project Manager MW/ce 11 cc: City of Eagan Building Inspections Department City of Eagan Planning Department Jim Thorne - Northwest Airlines, Inc. Bob. Ritchie - Northwest Airlines, Inc. Mark Hanson - Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlick & Associates • 9V Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five PRELIMINARY PLAT/PINECREST ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat for Pinecrest Addition Consisting of 17 Single -Family Lots and a Rezoning from A to R-1 for Seven Acres and a variance for a Cul -de -Sac in Excess of 50.0 Feet --A public hearing was held by the APC on November 25, 198;6, to consider a preliminary plat consisting of approximately seven acres, containing 17 single-family lots and a rezoning from A to R-1 in addition to a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. The APC discussed the overall development of the property and how road connections could be made to the east and west, noted that all lots are in conformance with the R-1 requirements and further discussed storm water run-off and the length of the cul-de-sac. It is the recommendation of the APC that the preliminary plat • be approved consisting of 16 lots with the access road stubbed to the west and also that the park trail be worked out with the Parks Commission for our City Council meeting. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report foundon pages424 through //a For a copy of the recommendation by the Advisory Parks and Recrea- tion Commission, refer to page /// . For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to pages //Z -through _0_Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning and preliminary plat as presented by Huttner Construction for the Pinecrest Addition and to approve or deny the variance • for a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT- Rezoning APPLICANT: Preliminary Plat (Pinecrest Addition) Huttner Construction LOCATION: SW ;, Section 15' EXISTING ZONING: A (Ag.) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: November 17, 1986 REPORTED BY: Planning and Engineering • APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by Huttner Construction requesting a rezoning of 7 agricultural acres to an R-1 (single family) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Pinecrest Addition. This plat consists of 17 lots anti is located south of Crestridge Lane, abutting Fish Lake Park on the south property line. The Comprehensive Guide Plan des- ignates this area as R-1, therefore an Amendment will not be necessary. LANDUSE/SITE PLAN: This 350' wide parcel is surrounded by ag. parcels to the east and west. this City's Park Department owns property south of this parcel, some or al'l of which may be under water. The master plan for this park calls for a trail connection from the recently completed 'built' portion of the park to the peninsula on the north side of the lake. Either an easement or land dedication will be necessary for this connection. Fish Lake has a General .Development designation under the City's Shoreland Ordinance. This will require that the homes on lots 7, 8 and 9 be a minimum of 50' from the Ordinary High Water Eleva- tion (OHWE). The submitted grading; plan places the building pads at least 85' in lineal distance and approximately 25' above that elevation. All lots 'conform to Code requirements- in terms of size, frontage and square.footage. The original submission was for 17 lots served by a single 650' cul-de-sac. Other options .have been discussed including one with a stub street to' the west and one with a connection to Kolstad Lane.. The gross density for the 16 lot proposal would be 2.3 units/acre and 2.4 units/acre for the 17 lot proposal. The site has packets of dense vegetation including mature hardwood species and a large area of scotch pines near the center of the site. The topography contains knolls and depressions and falls dramatically towards the lake. The proposed cul-de-sac 'will be nearly 30' above the 'normal lake elevation. The applicant will be. -the site builder for this subdivision and the homes will be.in the $140,000 range. � fo PInECREST ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE TWO GRADING/DRAINAGE: Presently, approximately the northern one-third of this parcel drains north towards Crestridge Lane with the southern two-thirds draining south into Fish Lake. This proposed development will be performing extensive grading on this site resulting in cuts of approximately 10-12' through the middle portion of this parcel, resulting in the majority of the drainage being directed by an internal storm sewer system into Fish Lake. Fish Lake is presently controlled at an elevation of 844.8 by means of an existing storm sewer system down to the Minnesota River. Due to the sensitivity and qaulity of this lake, extensive erosion control measures will have to be implemented during the development phases. UTILITIES: A 15" trunk sanitary sewer line of sufficient depth and capacity is immediately available across the southern portion of this unplatted parcel. The internal sewer lateral system will connect directly into this trunk facility. A water main of sufficient capacity and pressure is immediately available within Crestridge Lane. This proposed development will obtain service by extending an internal 6" water lateral and provide a stub for future extension to the west for future looping if, and when, the adjacent unplatted parcels develop in a similar manner. STREET CONFIGURATION/CIRCULATION: The initial application for the development of this parcel provided for only a singular cul-de-sac taking access from Crestridge Lane approximately 650' in length, exceeding the 500' maximium required by code. As a part of the overall development of these several remaining unplatted parcels between Crestridge Lane and Fish Lake, it has been determined that a stub street should be constructed from this proposed cul-de-sac to the west boundaries of this plat for future extensions. The center line of this stub street should be approximately 400' south of the center line at Crestridge Lane. Figure 1 shows the recommended master plan for the future development of these unplatted parcels. Figure 2 shows an alternate configuration that was reviewed by staff. However, it would require the replatting of the existing Buffer Hills cul-de-sac (adjacent to Pilot Knob Road) and would require the dedication and construction of a public street and right-of-way through the adjacent easterly parcel to Kolstad Road. Subsequently, the developer has revised his proposed preliminary plat to conform to the recommendations consistent with Figure 1. A condition should be placed to ensure that no direct driveway access is taken from a stub street to the west to minimize winter snow and ice control maintenance requirements. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Presently, there is a 40-42' half right- of-way for Crestridge Lane as dedicated with the previous Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition. Crestridge Lane is presently constructed to its ultimate design standards, which requires only a maximum 30' half right-of-way. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that as a condition of this plat all excess right-of-way beyond a 30' half right-of-i.ay be vacated and included as developable property with this plat. 97 PINECREST ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE ;L: Staff concurs with the proposed 60' public right-of-way dedication for the internal street servicing this proposed development. All other internal drainage „and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by the final alignment and depth of any internal utility systems constructed outside of dedicated right-of-way. ASSESSMENTS: Both Outlot A of Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition and the unplatted parcel 070-51 have been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and water benefits. Therefore, there are no additional assessment obligations associated with these trunk area utilities. However, the trunk area storm sewer assessment levied under Project #77 in 1972 did not cover the entire area of both parcels. • Subsequently, there are five acres proposed to be platted under this application that have not fulfilled their trunk area storm. sewer obligation. In addition, when the trunk area sanitary sewer was installed across the southern boundary of this parcel, the lateral benefit was deferred until time of development and/or connection. Subsequently, this development will be responsible for 350' of lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer. A detailed research of the assessmentrecords also revealed that there ire $1,542.86 of outstanding levied special assessments that have never been collected due to Outlot A going tax forfeit. This outstanding amount, plus any interest due, should be the responsibility of this development. • While the outstanding additional assessment obligations associated with this plat will be calculated at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval, the financial obligation has been estimated for informational purposes only using the 1986 rates as follows: Item Quantity Trunk Area Storm Sewer 218,642.6/sf Lateral Benefit from Trunk Sanitary Sewer 350/lf Outstanding Balance from Tax Forfeit (Outlot A) Proj. Rate Amount Code $ 0.05/sf $10,932.13 279 $28.69/lf 10,041.50 58 $ 1,542.86 P:INECREST ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE FOUR CONDITIONS: PINECREST PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right-of-way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30' half right-of-way and this vacated right-of-way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right-of-way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. 4. This development shall submit and adhere to a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City standards and special requirements for this development. 5. No driveway accesses shall be taken from the stub street to the west. 6. This development shall be responsible for all outstanding assessment obligations at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 7. All public street and utility improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with City engineering standards. 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul-de-sac on the single access proposal shall be. granted. 10. 'The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for their recommendations.of the parks dedication and or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning ordinances. • LOCATION EXISTING ZONING COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN JIL JAI t7l L �-�L�-j NEB —LB —0—, R R41 clsc 'ITY R- AALL 11 R-1 �� 04 r? I R-19 A v a s gel z 11%,/%ll(1(two �• o 1 I l mw) v rnc um�n.. r.. LA ra PN - PINECREST ADDITION 'UTILITY PLAN :NUTTNER CONSTRUCTION.INC._ a s z �• o m <. m r O v m m z H >' ._ .... _ m a O O z I _ O O z ,a 0 r r Z rnc um�n.. r.. LA ra PN - PINECREST ADDITION 'UTILITY PLAN :NUTTNER CONSTRUCTION.INC._ - fl IT t 12. • uu.ue ro.�YO: mrlaevu0u _' f I. . I reorouo JOYIY.: r CO o IS ° AM1A: 1,0 AT K' AT i' • .. I AS Irt,OAO.I,V W ' • 3. a 1fi e ° AG - - TOTAL LOT.: „ - /L LV . - a 1.1101:1 LO, eL0[ 09.810 1 -1 - - .. AS I`fl e ...LL m Lar urn IT.... •,r. • 0 I9 4 _]4 t ¢;AT • ILL LOTS 1..000 ..1. YI•. Q AS J.0 ... LOTS n' Y LL L„YL 091.0. 409 } k I PLAT INFORMATION O �_ fi • 13. J 0 ° J W6 i F.- y n1.I e 09009 Ouurrno. r..... • ore -n .o.nrl .a wlyw _ 0 c L•• =�Vmvlx r0=Q � - fl t 12. • uu.ue ro.�YO: mrlaevu0u _' f . reorouo JOYIY.: r CO o AM1A: 1,0 AT • .. I Irt,OAO.I,V W ' Z e ° { - - TOTAL LOT.: „ - /L LV . - a 1.1101:1 LO, eL0[ 09.810 1 -1 - - .. e ...LL m Lar urn IT.... •,r. 0 ¢;AT • ILL LOTS 1..000 ..1. YI•. Q J.0 LOTS n' Y LL L„YL 091.0. 409 ° • J J W6 L•• ••o•.. AITT e• 1:J T e C;aw zw FISH LAKE PARK - v 1 _ _ z S¢W .. . •- .°L01,low Al.. :� =N �W R: HL.L AD CRESk RIDGE LANE I• — u BLOCK 1 i is F �fl e' Rew • I 2 15. ^ IT I 13 , K• IT CRESTRIDGE WAY t 12. I IV U � i fi c tw7 a 1t LI B. .FISH LAKE PARK T un.no. AS PLAT INFORMATION L...L ...o. ono.:.....' ma -n ,mu................ I• "Z4 L.I.TIx.. exmo: .O.ICULT W AL IN l...0..xlxo: ... non u.6: 10 . ew m: a ual.u. x!1 .nl.: ]Y e.x a rr: ..r 19.19.19. rer.L. ler.: . LA..ur Ler •I.0 ...... ..r. .u.LL..r LOT tSu 19.2.6 S.F. ALL Ler........... -'-- ALL .uL LOT@ .6 x1\u Tx. muu LINK 0 e • -_ FISH LAKE ;P ARK. 1.�uu uev]noe, i DRAINAGE, DEVELOPMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN uyM�Ufd /i�l f D /. � V •. _ SII .1. city of eagan PUBLIC . WORKS nERARTME �e'r KNOB RD. / GE CT. G I L�� n W F N IZ 0 r Lu U H H H KOLSTAD I? l �beNMAKK AVE.. PINECREST -ADDITION • /D 6 . approved: standard plate #: FIG. 1 city of eagan M31-2 . WORKS F /DGE Cl: I N jJ,L1H1�1 1 � tGOLrSTAC RD. l _� I bEJJMAIZK Ms. 1 PINECREST ADDITION /07 2 4 J Ld 2 BL F- N V Cj approved: standard plate #: FIG.2 x city of e?gan PUB -1c WORKS SUBJECT PARCEL PINECREST ADD. STORM SWER FIG. *1 approved: standard plate #: n -yy . AY p� JOr. / s% ,f - i`T BIW U.5 POSTAL I IZI ` - B $ SERVICE w." - 4 f � f AI Y j / 1 NF— C� I �I \ � I 12 --I �laba� ,/ I tt T MINA I I'I i j BZ / < - `1 _ �FFRESS-- I' //^ - N 5 WRK 7. � 1511 ulDM)ADDITION �� `ice N -o 1!ol�lro� sa s9 301 / Fi k FOX 'I---� / N -E / C u _ RIODE' AFI - N-., • /// /// - /I/II N - V LLII 26 ' .�^ ! '�r 1U�1 / W h� SJ EI Ff fY1JL 111 G O r,. �� ¢ 1 LLIC G iT f PNO-� •.'�l `-- • '31 I. p9 ADDITION D eye 4 J PLOT KNOB �I�ti�,l {_i S 12 r ae�. I' �K rew00D LCENTER , RAILS PaIILJf 1�N.1`11 <'L7,1 L ,, e� 11ADDON \A KR! /.W'�1�F\IDCCI i-Ilff„VV1'1et,"_ _ C -DrB�5130 acrcH.3fiIN AgRE` J WILLS CITY C-II%iaYti�'sM"��— Ck(} jell 111 aLACNHAwII \ .. ��`�� C- f I 1 ( - I— -k" ^I _ PAHN ` 1 h JI F © o � 1 L�R � a �;1 1a'1 s f� T ty *�j-y�.�I �1 O K VDASE AOy rr� 61 1 daJ\-I j 3311 _� z NO. c -Pp' j >n J w j] 117 Sxowl71, I rP ��tliu,�' n;� h I' 15 12 l �y1 � ' 33 0 l I� r1ILANDALE'------- ��u� 7� AfRICn PINECREST ADD. ............... ................ ............... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #2 city of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved:- platePUELI#d WORK /Q F, WORKS MASTER PLAN city of eagan WATER PUBLIC $ woes MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN TO FIG. *3 approved: standard plate #: '.M .Y: ,z city of eagan WATER PUBLIC $ woes MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN TO FIG. *3 approved: standard plate #: MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR I/ FROM: CEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATIONj� DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1986 RE: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION - PINECREST ADDITION At the regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on • December 4, the Commission reviewed the proposed rezoning and preliminary plat for the Pinecrest Addition. The Advisory Commission has made the following recommendations: 1. That a cash dedication requirement pay for the seventeen (17) lots created with this plat. 2. That a trail easement be provided through proposed lots 119, 1110, at an elevation above the high water elevation and at least 10 ft. in width. 3. That said trailway through these lots, extending to and connecting park property, be benched in by the developer. KV/bls cc: Julie Dykstra, Planning Aide Dale Runkle, City Planner Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works LJ APC Minutes November 25, 1986 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submission. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. All voted in favor except Harrison who abstained. PINECREST ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING The hearing on the application of Huttner Construction for rezoning and • preliminary plat of Pinecrest Addition was then convened. The rezoning request was to allow 7 agricultural acres to be rezoned R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat located south of Crestridge Lane, abutting Fish Lake Park. City Planner Runkle introduced the application and indicated that there was some disagreement as to the best alternative to a long cul-de-sac for this proposal. Issues raised at a neighborhood meeting included the quality of storm water into Fish Lake, the length of the cul-de-sac, and the number of lots. Mr. Huttner was present and indicated that the homes to be built would be in the $120,000.00 to $160,000.00 range. Mr. Dale Nathan of 1308 Kolstad Lane appeared and stated he was in favor of the project without the alternative street hook-up to Kolstad Lane. Mr. Ed Kolstad of 1320 Kolstad Lane also expressed his being in favor of the project without the extension to Kolstad Lane. Discussion then centered around the alternatives to a long cul-de-sac and the need for park access to the peninsula south of the property. Mr. Colbert indicated that an easement for the park would be a condition of the plat. All ® lots exceeded 12,000 square feet and the cul-de-sac would be 650 feet in length. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the request for rezoning and preliminary plat with a variance for the cul-de- sac. The stub street would not be required. The approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right-of-way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30 foot half right-of- way and this vacated right-of-way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right-of-way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. APC Minutes November 25, 1986 4. This development shall submit and adhere to a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City standards and special requirements for this development. 5. No driveway accesses shall be taken from the stub street to the west. 6. This development shall be responsible for all outstanding assessment obligations at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 7. All public street and utility improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with City engineering standards. 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul—de—sac on the single access proposal shall be granted. 10. The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for their recommendations of the parks dedication and/or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning ordinances. Harrison and Wilkins voted in favor; McCrea, Trygg, Hall, Voracek and Mulrooney voted no. Mulrooney then moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat, with a stub street to the west, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right—of—way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30 foot half right—of— way and this vacated right—of—way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. is 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right—of—way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. 4. This development shall submit and adhere to a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City standards and special requirements for this development. 5. No driveway accesses shall be taken from the stub street to the west. 6. This development shall be responsible for all outstanding assessment obligations at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 7. All public street and utility improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with City engineering standards. • APC Minutes November 25, 1986 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul-de-sacon the single access proposal shall be granted. 10. The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for its recommendations of the parks dedication and/or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning, ordinances. f 12. That the developer take all necessary steps required by staff to control erosion into Fish Lake. Mulrooney, Voracek, Trygg and McCrea voted yes; Wilkins, Hall and Harrison voted no. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 8 - PRELIMINARY PLAT The final hearing was then convened by temporary Chairman Harrison based on the application of Opus Corporation for preliminary plat of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 8, resulting from a replat of seven existing lots or portions thereof into 4 lots with frontage on either Eagandale Industrial Road 'or the West Service Road, located north of Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E. Dale Runkle introduced the replat and Mr. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus, concurring with all staff requirements and indicating that it was a clean-up of a waiver of plat resulting from expansion of National Business Systems. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. An 8 inch water main shall be constructed on the north side of the West Service Road between Eagandale Boulevard and Center Court in accordance with City approved engineering standards. 2. A drainage easement necessary to incorporate 1.1 acre-feet of ponding in the northeast corner 'of.Lot 2, shall be dedicated with the final plat. The actual construction of this drainage basin will be deferred until the time of building ,permit application. 3. This development shall accept the financial responsibility associated with the ,additional 8 inch water main construction or waive their right to objection if installed under a City contract. 4. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 5. This plat shall be subject to a parka dedication fee. All voted yes. 13 u Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Six Memo City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER #8 E. Preliminary Plat for Eagandale Industrial Center #8--A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on November 25, 1986, to consider the replatting of Lots 13, 14, 16, 17 and part of 18, Block 5, into four newly created lots located in part of the SE 1/4 of Section 3. The new lots have been established to allow free standing buildings or add two existing lots for building expansion. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to the/ Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages 116 through For a copy of the action taken by the APC, refer to those minutes found on page(s) >z;5. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat to replat certain lots in Eagandale Industrial Center #'8. /15 r\ LJ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (EAGANDALE'CTR INDUSTRIAL PARK #8 APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: LOTS 12-18 BLOCKS EAGANDALE CTR INDUSTRIAL PARK #1 SE i SECTION 3 EXISTING ..ZONING: L.I. (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1986 REPORTED. BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Opus Corporation requesting a replat of seven existing lots, or portions o4 into four lots with frontage on either Eagandale Industrial Road or West Service Road. This replat will become the Eagandale Center Industrial Park #8 and is located north of. Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E. COMMENTS: All four lots meet' City Code requirements. Lot 1 contains four acres with 347' of frontage along West Service Road. -American Fruit, and Produce, to thewest, will use this lot for future expansion. Lot 2, to the north, will remain 400' wide but increase in size from 8.0 acres to 9.99 acres with frontage on Eagandale Industrial• Road. New Holland is to the west and the Northwestern Warehouse is to the east. Both lots will be serviced by an existing rail spur along the western property line. Lot 3, 300' wide, contains 5.15.acres and has access from West Service Road. It also has rail service from the north along the east property line. Lot 4 is a product of a Waiver of Plat approved in June 1986. That Waiver created a larger lot to the north that now contains the nearly completed National Business Systems building. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed replat of Lots 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, and part of 18 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park into four lots under the 8th Addition is presently divided into two major drainage districts within the overall Industrial Park. Lots 1, 3 and 4 generally drain to the south towards the West Service Road and into the recently constructed trunk storm sewer system which provides sufficient storm water capacity to carry developed surface water runoff into LeMay Lake, which has a positive outlet to the Minnesota River. The northern portion (Lot 2) lies within the northern half of the drainage basin of this Industrial Park and directs the surface water runoff towards the existing storm sewer system in Eagan Industrial Road. However, this existing storm sewer system does not hr.ve adequate capacity to handle any development of Lot 2. A EAGANDALE CTR IND PARK #8 NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE TWO Therefore, Lot 2 will have to restrict its future surface water runoff through an onsite detention pond to ensure that the rate of future surface water runoff leaving the site does not exceed its present undeveloped rate of 8 CFS. This will require the development of a 1.1 acre -ft. pond which is proposed to be located in�the northeast corner of Lot 2. Because this is a replat of existing platted parcels, no major grading is proposed. Therefore, all detailed grading and erosion control plans will have to be reviewed and evaluated with the individual building permit applications. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, depth and capacity to service this development is presently available within Eagan Industrial Road and the West Service Road. A 12" water main presently exists along the south side ofEagan Industrial Road. In addition, an 8" water main presently exists along the west side of the West Service Road adjacent to Lots 3 and 4. However, it does not continue west with an interconnection to the existing 12"' water main within Eagandale Boulevard. Subsequently, proposed Lot 1 does not have water service immediately available. After reviewing the required fire flow and development needs regarding water availability, it is recommended that an 8" water main be constructed along the north side of the West Service Road between Center'Court and Eagandale Boulevard providing service to Lot 1 and a looping of the overall water system through the Industrial Park. • A STREETS/CIRCULATION: All streets within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park are presently constructed to their ultimate design width. However, all the streeets within the Industrial Park have been recently evaluated and it has been determined that an additional structural overlay will be required in order to maintain • the required axle load capacity necessary for heavy industrial traffic use. Presently, this Industrial Park is serviced with only three major accesses: Eagandale Boulevard at T.H. 55 to the north. Corporate Center Drive at Pilot Knob Road to the west. Eagandale Boulevard at Lone Oak Road to the south. As the Industrial Park continues to grow, traffic control will become more of a concern. Eagandale Boulevard at Lone Oak Road is scheduled to have a traffic signal installed during 1988. At the present time, there is no schedule for any signalization of the remaining two intersections. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-0F-WAY/PERMITS: All public right-of-way necessary to accommodate this proposed development has been previously dedicated with the underlying plat or acquired by MnDOT with the West Service Road connection to Eagandale Boulevard. The only 117 EAGANDALE CTR IND PARK #8 'NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE additional easements beyond those required over the common lot lines will be the ponding easement in the northeast corner of proposed Lot 2 to accommodate the future required onsite detention basin. Although this is a replat of an underlying existing subdivision, there were no previously dedicated common lot line easements that have to be vacated in consideration of this replat. With the exception of the water main construction required, there are no known regulatory agency permit requirements associated with this development. ASSESSMENTS: The underlying lots proposed to be replatted have previously been assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and water under Projects #11 and 28, respectively. The underlying Eagandale Center Industrial Park was originally • platted prior to the implementation of the current City Master Storm Sewer Plan and related assessment policies. Subsequently, this property has not been assessed its trunk area storm sewer assessment. However, the overall Industrial Park has been responsible for 100% of the costs of all 'required storm sewer improvements irregardless of the size or area serviced. Therefore, this Industrial Park has been exempted from the trunk area storm sewer requirements, with the understanding that any and all required storm sewer facilities necessary to service this Park as it continues to develop will be' the full responsibility of the benefitted property, with no contribution required from the City's trunk storm sewer system. With the exception of the required 8" water main looping on the West Service Road from Center Court to Eagandale Boulevard and the proposed future overlay within the Industrial Park, there are no • anticipated future assessment obligations associated with this replatting. CONDITIONS: EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER NO. 8 1. An 8" water main shall be constructed on the north side of the West Service Road between Eagandale Boulevard and Center Court in accordance with City approved engineering standards. 2. A drainage easement necessary to incorporate 1.1 acre -ft. of ponding in the northeast corner of Lot 2 shall be dedicated with the final plat. The actual construction of this drainage basin will be deferred until the time of building permit application. 3. This development shall accept the financial responsibility associated with the additional 8" water main construction or waive their right to objection if installed under a City contract. 4. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. c 5. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. w Koo2 UNPLATTEO- A ..aK :. " .z 15 94?K R;�11 2n 3 1 r 3 P� SCORR s o27 +,r33 34 35 36 ,iv1 F�4 99K VL 2 A 1 N� 2 3 4 rv3' ..E B.K.... raK 93rK 1 EAGANDALE BUSINESS McKEE 1 G CAMPUS EAGANDALE _ Si J OFFICE seeK ,v suK Q CENTER �� EGND CE141 cl 3 2 - ,. G — 7 _ _.� FIRST n�DlTl: 'A •NEW 0� L0T28LK1 HOLLAND Y1° �'°"0 21 DIVISION OF ''c,, 15 SPERRY " 17 ]mKUd oumEw RAND SEVEH k yK BUSWESS AD ITION LENTEN 90 AMERICAN `O FRUIT & PRODUCE G�P`�2,1��2Pv EXCEProN 2P OUTLOT 7 .4IK14 19 EX( uro 15_. ww OUTLOT6 2 A CAF J9n9t 16 ` imK 3 2 r. C ;'.PI 5 5 11 :.. ra K . _:a AC ewLOo 5 A ;SC e 99N l7 s>sK 4 i97- ec`-J urr�. ..aiq • 10 TL IZ3. svK ,y CNK" :uK-oUT[oT4—.. x' .a...c 115 rrK 12 19 6 9.pK gl m R 1 9 m u i es aelK _ 22 LEMAY UNPLATTED (a v LAKE UNPLATTED au K APARTMENTS .mo EXCEPTION • PRELIMINARY PLAT OF, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK N0. 8 ji 'I\�_, ��i-' � � � .I •. qac—._ „�.._ •I p99. KR6 I .E_i i I L_H ' wu q'. -..i 1 _. _�' IIS �! � s / �_ — = 6-�II�-� •'' �^-� ,� BOCK Ii.O % �'- -.i'�G Ixli !�\1�� rll ��l�. ii'' 1 ... \•��\�L` > i _ 7. \ lav,oa so Rx' _�' -t j• - / –• j 8 siau oro-- s � . e i li 'i I — - _ III _ • „ /a i "a�\a I I Lp'.1TIOM IW Olre ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER No. 8 FIG. #1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plated PUBLIC y/ WORKS ,-.•--,�-„ q %I w EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER No.8 city of eagan PUrjLlC 104 SUBJECT PARCEL ............... SANITARY SEWER 71 `IAIST R PLAN 61 N -T AOO N1.< FIG. #2 approved:- standard I plate #: EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER No. 8 city of eagan PUBLIC $ � woP.s DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. #3 approved: standard plate #: • APC Minutes November 25, 1986 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul-de-sac on the single access proposal shall be granted. 10. The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for its recommendations of the parks dedication and/or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning ordinances. 12. That the developer take all necessary steps required by staff to control erosion into Fish Lake. Mulrooney, Voracek, Trygg and McCrea voted yes; Wilkins, Hall and Harrison voted no. EACANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 8 - PRELIMINARY PLAT The final hearing was then convened by temporary Chairman Harrison based on the application of Opus ,Corporation for preliminary plat of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 8, resulting from a replat of seven existing lots or portions thereof into 4 lots with frontage on either Eagandale Industrial Road 'or the West Service Road, located north of Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E. Dale Runkle introduced the replat and Mr. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus, concurring with all staff requirements and indicating that it was a clean-up of a waiver of plat resulting from expansion of National Business Systems. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. An 8 inch water main shall be constructed on the north side of the West Service Road between Eagandale Boulevard and:Center Court in accordance with City approved engineering standards. 2. A drainage easement necessary to incorporate 1.1 acre-feet of ponding in the northeast corner of Lot 2, shall be dedicated with the final plat. The actual construction of this drainage basin will be deferred until the time of building permit application. 3. This development shall accept the financial responsibility associated with the additional 8 inch water main construction or waive their right to objection if installed under a City contract. 4. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 5. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. All voted yes. Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Seven Memo City Council Meeting DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING F. Resolution for Fiscal Year 1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding Application --The City has received an application from the Dakota County HRA for housing rehabilita- tion funds that total $285,000 and would serve approximately 37 owner occupied households in the community development district. The project will provide low interest deferred loans for low and moderate income homeowners. Any form of owner occupied housing would, be eligible, including mobile homes. During the initial nine month period, each community, which includes Apple Valley, Burnsville and Eagan, can target funds to meet certain local ® objectives. The funding is set -aside with Apple Valley receiving 24%, Burnsville 44% and Fagan 32%. For a copy of project objectives and description, refer to pages through IZ� For a copy of the resolution approving the pplication of the City of Eagan for fiscal year 1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding, refer to page. The Planning Department, under the coordination and direct staff time of Dale Runkle, has helped to prepare this information along with the cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley and the Dakota County HRA. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolu- tion adopting the Community Development Block Grant Funding Application/Program for 1987.' Attachment A Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Proposal Fiscal Year 1987 1 Households between these income ranges would be eligible for loans. 2 Households below these incomes would be eligible for deferred loans. MW /ZL City of Eagan 4. Documentation in Support of Federal Objectives a. Benefit to Low and Moderate Income Persons The housing rehabilitation program will only be available to those households in Eagan within 80% of the median income for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Statistical Area. (See income limits listed below..) The program funds are only available for persons in this low and moderate income bracket who maintain owner -occupied, single family dwellings. Program benefit to this income group is 100Y. INCOME LIMITS Family Size Loansl Deferred Loans2 1 $12,300 - $19,250 $12,300 2 14,050 - 22,000 14,050 3 15,800 - 24,750, 15,800 4 17,550 - 27,500 17,550 5 18,950 - 29,200 18,950 6 20,350 - 30,950 20,350 7 21,750 - 32,650 21,750 8+ 23,150 - 34,400 23,150 1 Households between these income ranges would be eligible for loans. 2 Households below these incomes would be eligible for deferred loans. MW /ZL Attachment A (con't) Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Proposal Fiscal Year 1987 City of Eagan 5. General Description of the Project a. Project Description The dp ign of the program will be a combination of loansl and deferred loans to owner -occupied, single-family homes. With a Community Development Block Grant of $285,000, thirty-seven (37) loans of $7,750 would be available for the district. Low-income households with incomes less than 50% of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) median income (see Attachment A, page 1) will be eligible for deferred loans. Moderate -income households with incomes between 50% and 80%. of the MSA median income who demonstrate adequate capacity to repay the loan, and give evidence of acceptable credit risk t will be eligible for 3% low-interest rate loans. The maximum loan amount for both deferred and low-interest loans for single-family homes will be $10,000 with a maximum term of ten (10) years. Rehabilitation loans and deferred loans may only be used to improve the property by increasing the structure's energy efficiency, or to remove health, safety, or other deficiencies and to bring the structure into compliance with the property rehabilitation standards used by the Housing and Redevelopment.Authority. These loans may also be used to modify or rehabilitate the housing unit .to make it accessible for a han- dicapped or disabled member of the household. The improvements financed by these loans must be completed within nine (9) months from the date of the issuance of the Proceed to Work Order. Rehabilitation loans and deferred loans may not be used to finance freestanding or built-in kitchen appliances, landscaping, or work begun or completed before the date of the Proceed to Work Order. 1 The maximum loan available would be $10,000 for rehabilitation. To secure the loan, a promissory note for the terms and conditions agreed to and a mortgage deed shall be signed by all parties listed on the title of the pro- perty to be improved. The mortgage shall be recorded with the County; copies of all recorded documents will be forwarded to the homeowner. 2 The maximum deferred loan available would be $10,000 for rehabilitation. If the property is sold, transferred, or no longer the principal residence of the applicant, all funds must be repaid. A repayment agreement stating these terms and conditions shall be signed by all parties to the title of the pro- perty to be improved. This agreement shall be recorded with the County; copies of all recorded documents will be forwarded to the applicant. -2- /L7 40 Attachment A (con't) MHFA Home Improvement Loans will be awarded to households, with incomes less than $27,000. The maximum loan amount will be $15,000 for fifteen (15) years with a variable interest rate of 3% - 9% depending on the households income. MHFA Rehabilitation Deferred Loans of up to $7,500 will be granted to households with incomes less than $7,000. B. Project Need ` The need for housing rehabilitation in Eagan has been moderate in the past. In Dakota County since 1976, 23 of the 773 (3%) of the total Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Loans and Community Development Block Grant loans in Dakota County have been awarded in the Eagan area. Of the 15 households on the Dakota County HRA's waiting list for Minnesota Housing Finance -Agency Loans 1 (7%) is a resident of Eagan. Of the 26 households on Dakota County HRA's waiting list for Community Development Rehab Funds 3 (12%) are residents of Eagan. The current waiting list of Eagan residents would seem to indicate a moderate demand for housing rehabilitation funds. C. Implementation The Dakota County HRA will act on behalf of the City of Eagan in admi- nistering these funds. The HRA will provide the following staff functions: 1. Program advertising and outreach. 2. Loan intake and processing. 3. Housing.inspectiohs, work write-ups, bidding, working with contrac- tors, and final inspections. 4. Program fund requisitions, record keeping and auditing. 5. On-going loan servicing and program income accounting. -3- l2� Attachment B Eagan # of Applicants: 11 v of Moderate Income: 3 i Refused: 1 # of Low Income: 4 ff on Waiting List: 3 i of Female'Head of Household: 3 e Served: 7 v of Elderly: I i of Small Family: 3 of Large Family: 3 Address Low or Moderate Income Walnut Lane Low Donald Avenue Low Amaryllis Lane Moderate Beryl Road Moderate Highway 55 Low Sigfrid Street Moderate_ Blue Gentian Road Low Cinnabar Drive Waiting List Cleome Lane Waiting List Cliff Road Waiting List /2l • City of Eagan Resolution No. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows: 1. The City Administrator is authorized to submit the attached application to Dakota County for a Community Development Block Grant in Fiscal Year 1987. 2. The application is approved by the City Council and the Mayor and City Administrator are authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Eagan. 3. That the Dakota County HRA be designated as the administrative entity to • carry out the program on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this. day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Bea Blomquist, Mayor • Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator x-36 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, LEXINGTON HILLS ADDITION G. Consider Final Plat Approval, Lexington Hills Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Hills Addition located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road. Enclosed on page /,3Y is a copy of the proposed final plat and all conditions required of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on October 7, 1986. However, as a part of the County review of this plat, due to its frontage along County Road 43 (Lexington Avenue), they have required that the existing intersection of Lexington Way (old • Lexington Avenue) with new Lexington Avenue be removed. This would result in Lexington Way being a cul-de-sac street approxi- mately 1,100 feet long with access to Diffley Road only. The requirement to eliminate this existing intersection is necessary to maintain the County's spacing guidelines between connecting intersections onto county roads due to the location of the proposed new major entrance into this apartment complex. The other item of concern to the County relates to providing access to the unplatted parcel to the north of the Lexington Hills Addition (proposed Episcopal church). While the County does not have the jurisdiction to require the provision of major access to this existing unplatted property in the northeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road, they strongly recommend that a major access be combined with the development of the ® Lexington Hills Addition due to the restrictions of access that will be placed on any future development of this unplatted property south of Lexington Hills. With the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road having to be upgraded and signalized in the future, the construction of required medians for traffic channelization will result in restricted access to this parcel. All other conditions of the City's final plat application process have been satisfactorily complied with. This includes the dedica- tion of a cross easement for the internal driveway to insure access for all units to Lexington Avenue. However, it does not provide for any access or cross easement to the unplatted property to the north as recommended by the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the final plat application for the Lexington Hills Addition and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 131 LEXINGTON HILLS FIRST ADDITION • • IN m -N- : a: JC i i' t r i � 9� •t . xaxrudfnYr.Yrinu4iu.r.ri I., .�.w.�•usx u. svnsn.lnw. n...Y.-+�r \ . .—..l[I�.gY M Yr.x • ..xxx Y YYx tYx 1 � i 1� i ^SIN�NQ !O ~_ _ OIFFLEI' RL`1J1 `— Irn ..r. r rY x ru .r ..r x r.• n .^r.r u G.ECEIVEDMV 2 ■UNV•YIMO ■t NVICO• SM[R ! •F t MEE" x 6 • •I II 1, it LEXINGTON HILLS FIRST ADDITION • • IN m -N- : a: JC i i' t r i � 9� •t . xaxrudfnYr.Yrinu4iu.r.ri I., .�.w.�•usx u. svnsn.lnw. n...Y.-+�r \ . .—..l[I�.gY M Yr.x • ..xxx Y YYx tYx 1 � i 1� i ^SIN�NQ !O ~_ _ OIFFLEI' RL`1J1 `— Irn ..r. r rY x ru .r ..r x r.• n .^r.r u G.ECEIVEDMV 2 ■UNV•YIMO ■t NVICO• SM[R ! •F t MEE" x • • Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION H. Consider Final Plat Approval, Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition, located in the northwest corner of Corporate Center Drive and Trapp Road. As the Council may recall, one of the conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on December 3, 1985, was the elimination of the proposed public right-of-way for the Trapp Court cul-de-sac. Subsequently, at several past City Council meetings, the applicant has requested the Council's reconsideration of the requirement to eliminate this public cul-de-sac. At the November 18 meeting, the Council agreed to allow this cul-de-sac to be platted as public right-of-way subject to the property owners entering into an agreement providing for perpetual private snow and ice control maintenance of this cul-de-sac. The developer would not agree to the terms and conditions of this maintenance agreement as prepared by the City. Subsequently, the developer no longer wishes to request that this cul-de-sac be platted as a public right-of-way but remain as a private cul-de- sac in accordance with the Council's original condition of approval a year ago. Enclosed on page /39 is a copy configuration which does not show the cul-de-sac. However, staff has provide a cost easement for this to insure continuous access of the deemed necessary by the developer design and subsequent plat application of the proposed final plat the public right-of-way for requested the developer to proposed private cul-de-sac three platted lots that was during the original layout process. However, the developer has objected to the City's requirement for this cross easement. Enclosed on pages)35a-/36is a letter explaining their objections. In executing the development contract agreement prepared by the City, the developer has crossed out the condition of the cross easement requirement and wishes to have the Council consider the elimination of this requirement. All other requirements of the final plat application process have been satisfactorily complied with. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM- To approve/deny the final plat application for Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. X33 EXHIBIT "A„ SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION s wrw lalw�...Y w wl.v. wr .w .•.r.s rw, . w—r w+w — r.�. yv111...lOw.w l.IrnrylO. O...l nq.w•�..1rw.rw� .wrY�r rr /. _.w•. R.r .r rY �rr.�w rr�lr .. r r�rwM r.q s.r I.N. w. r.+r r..rr�—..w+rwY tiAr wTrgr..lr ./w.M ' i¢Ai MRiM1fdrrr�r I r....�•� �: 1 ��.`•.�..w.� r ... �r r r w. ..•wI r_q_r w w_Ya • ��!� .� r�r.l. w.•rr /4 ...r r.wYw.r...YrI... r. �P.r r. rr—. w r� 3 ,r. LOT S •p4F.1 • y\ fr— •X ` ..�rw rr -J.r .._✓•.wrlr....r��. w..a ` . / • _^ '•• � Ir—.rrRrr.rr�•.4.Y rr �. r. err r.".r .. • • �: .` � �� K y� 4 y `r_..w�`r._Iww _r.wl..r+...r wr .+...q r'w.r.wr \' Cr ... . q� LOT 3 4•• i .. Zi I I. w /•�..'�I 1 LOT 3 liJ 1 rr. rr. r r r..... w n.r Y r w.. •. V. t:1. ••J•<... .� r w a...wr r Y.r ...r. r.Yf. r� ..1J.r�a. ww r. +r rr —rr Oy EXHIBIT "A„ SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS Suite 1440 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 Telephone: 612-921-2100 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE December 11, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges, City Manager City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company ("NML") - City of Eagan ("City"); Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - Trapp Court Cul de. Sac Dear Tom: rthw stern mai �rfe I write to restate in writing NML's position as discussed with you during our telephone conversation. The City has required, as a condition of its approval of the Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition Plat, that NML burden each of the three lots with easements in favor of the other two lots. The easements would establish the right of each lot to use the neighboring lots for cul de sac purposes. The City, over the past year, has refused to accept the dedication of the Trapp Court Cul de Sac because (i) it is the City's opinion the cul de sacs are too expensive to maintain in the winter, (ii) that all of the lots affected already have access to public right of way; and (iii) the City would prefer a through street connecting Trapp Road to Corporate Center Drive. Cul de sacs are designed to help control traffic flow and benefits far exceed the cost of removing the snow. The lots all have access to the public street, therefore, it is my under- standing the City feels the cul de sac is unnecessary. If this is true, why does the City want to burden itself with controlling a private street that is unnecessary. In 1932, the Minnesota Department of Transportation condemmed additional land along Interstate 494 which substantially reduced the depths of /35 THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY • Milwaukee n LJ Page Two December 11, 1986 the lots north and northwest of the then dedicated continuation of Trapp Road. These lots became undevelopable.as-a result of the taking, in order to midigate the damages as required by condemnation law, NML presented a development plan to the City showing the realignment of Trapp Road, Trapp Court Cul de Sac and Eagan Industrial Road (Corporate Center Drive). In October of 1983, the land in question was replatted from Eagandale Center Industrial Park to Eagandale Office Park. The extension of Trapp Road to the west was vacated and the realignment of Trapp Road and the new Corporate Center Drive were approved with the plat. Trapp Road was realigned' to its present location, rather the farther west, because of the substantial change in elevation which would have required the destruction of almost all of the trees in the area in order to obtain the proper slopes. The construction of the road further to the west would have been much more expensive and more expensive to maintain. Therefore, I do not understand why the City would prefer a street through the site. NML objects to creating the above described cross -easements, because (i) NML does not want to preclude its intended marketing approach with respect to the two non -Sperry lots (i.e., NML intends to offer a proposed buyer the choice of access to the cul de sac together with mai.ntenance obligations or no access to the cul de sac and hence no maintenance obligations); and (ii) NML does not want to go through the inconvenience of, nor burden the City with obtaining the City's permission to terminate the private cross -easements if termination is desired in the future (presumably, such permission would be necessary if the creation of the private cross -easements is a condition of the Development Agreement). • The City has not informed NML of any significant public interest that would be served by the creation of the private cross -easements. The only public interest thus far cited by the City is the City's desire to prevent future disputes between private land owners with respect to their private land, which disputes the land owners might mistakenly believe to be within the jurisdiction of the City. NML does not , consider the City's desire to prevent such disputes to be significant enough to warrant the above-described inconvenience to NML and the above-described interference with NML's ownership and marketing of its land. Very truly yours, THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY n� Thomas S. Davis Assistant Manager TSD/nph 13� cc: Elizabeth Goodman Pail Hauge Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty z-ADDITIONAL;� ITEMS9 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Change Order #2, Contract 8`6-1 for 1986.Parks Construction Project --Change order #2 in the amount of $7,763.93, which provides payment to the contractor for costs incurred for material and labor on items not included within Project 86-01, is in order for consideration. This work included the removal of blacktop,- subcutting of Blackhawk Road at the corner of Blue_ Cross Park • and Blackhawk Road and constructing, 165 linear feet of B618 curb with bituminous mats; transportation and installation of additional top soil at Blue Cross Park; additional subcutting work and storm water pipe installation at South Oaks Park and Meadowland Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change order #2 for improvement Contract 86-01 for Central Landscaping Inc., in the amount of $7,763.93 and authorize the Mayor to execute. this change order. Item 2. Contract 86-14, Approve Change Orders #1 and 2 ('Greensboro Addition) -- Change Order #1: This change order provides for additional payment to the contractor for extra work necessary to improve the subgrade within public right-of-way necessary to support the typical traffic loads within this subdivision. Existing soil conditions, groundwater elevation and frequent rainfall experienced during utility installation resulted in an unstable subgrade. The total cost of this upgrade correction results in an Add of $31,657.14. All costs associated with this change order will be assessed against the subdivision. Change Order #2: This change. order provides for the installation of four new sewer and water services installed within Highview Avenue to accommodate existing and potential future lot splits prior to the final surfacing of that street. The change order is added under the Greensboro Addition contract rather than the Highview Avenue contract due to the favorable bids received to do these utility service installations. All costs associated with these new services will be assessed against the benefitted property owners in accordance with their petitioned request. This change order results in an Add of $2,,400. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change orders. #1 and 2 to Contract 86-14 (Greensboro Addition/Highview Avenue) and if approve, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. - - Agenda Information Memo December 16, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTCONTRACTS B. Private Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 8'5-J, Final Acceptance (Haeg Addition) --This project provided for the installation of sewer and water services to service the new lots created under the development of the Haeg Addition. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action regarding acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:To approve Contract 85-J (Haeg Addition) and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Contract 86-V, Final Acceptance (Sunset 6th Addition) --This contract provided for the installation of streets and utilities to service the ten lot subdivision of the Sunset 6th Addition. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and these improvements are found to be in order for favorable Council action for formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 86-v (Sunset 6th Addition) and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance. 134 • • Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Thirty -Two Memo City Council Meeting CONSIDERATION OF CITY CODE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 6.42 C. Consider Amendment to City Code, Chapter 6, Section 6.42 to Change Requirements for Licensing Building Contractors --Effective January 1, 1983, a license:, bond and insurance provision for all construction, alteration or repair of buildings was enacted as an ordinance. For the past four (4) calendar years, the City has required contractor licenses, copies of performance bonds and liability insurance for any builder or contractor that is performing any new construction or alteration and repair of existing buildings throughout the community. The Building Inspection Department has commented to this office that licensing contractors has become a labor intensive exercise for their staff. More • recently, the City Clerk's office has raised question regarding the validity of a performance bond and the necessity for requiring notice of insurability by contractors. City Councilmember Wachter recently addressed the issues at a City Council meeting, suggesting that the City review the performance bond and determine whether the City has any regulatory authority over a contractor if a building permit is granted and a contractor or a builder performs faulty construction work. A meeting was held on Thursday, December 11, with City Councilmember Wachter, Chief Building Official Peterson, Assistant Building Official Reid and the City Administrator to discuss contractor licensing and more specifically the need for performance bonds and notice of insurability. At the suggestion of Assistant Building Official Reid and a strong concurrence by City Councilmember Wachter, Chief Building Official Peterson and the City ® Administrator, it was determined that the contractor licensing should be abolished for the following reasons: 1. The performance -bond does not serve any purpose for either' the homeowner or the city if faulty workmanship should occur by a builder or contractor. 2. It was determined that the City may be increasing its liability exposure by requiring notice of insurability by each builder if there is aclaim made any time during the, construction of a building. 3. The final reason for abolishing the actual contractor licensing is the determination that our building inspectors have made that once a contractor license is granted, the City must issue building permits to this builder regardless of his performance unless contractor license is revoked by the City Council. If the contractor licensing is abolished', the Building Inspectors have the freedom of the Uniform Building Code to deny a contractor or builder a building permit if their performance was not acceptable for the construction or alteration of a dwelling unit or commercial building in the ccmmur. itv. Other communis`- -.;- - Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three by Assistant Building Official Reid and interestingly enough most of the growth communities such as Bloomington, Burnsville, Maple Grove, Eden Prairie and Apple Valley do not have contractor licenses for this reason. The city of Eden Prairie had contractor licensing but abolished this regulatory control for the afore- mentioned reasons. Our Building Inspectors have observed and been told by various property owners that some contractors bill the cost of their license fee, performance bond and insurance to each and every project they construct in a given calendar year. Obviously, the duplication of cost is not fair to the consumer, however, the City should not control or monitor this type of activity. One other topic discussed at the meeting on Thursday, was the • idea to hold a homebuyers seminar sponsored by the Building Inspection Department each spring. This seminar would be in addition to a meeting that the City staff are giving consideration to with realtors and contractors that will be held during the late winter months. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny considera- tion of amending Section 6.42 by abolishing the construction, alteration or repair of buildings license, bond and insurance provision of the City Code. NOTE: The Director of Finance/City Clerk suggested that if this section is amended, the City might print a statement on each permit application that "The City assumes no responsibility for the builder's insurability or performance." THOMAS LAKE HOUSING SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT • D. Thomas Lake Housing Associates Supplemental and Regulatory Agreement --The Tax Reform Act of 1986 has imposed certain require- ments on multi -family projects such as the Thomas Lak2 Pointe project which was granted Mult-Family Housing Revenue Bonds by the City of Eagan. According to Jack Safar, representing Dominium Group and owner of the Thomas Lake Pointe project, it is necessary that the project avail itself of certain transitional status concerning depreciation allowances. In order to qualify, the project through its ownership entity must subject itself to both 1) a limited rate of return and 2) rental charge limitations on all of the dwelling units of the project. Both of these provi- sions provide added protection to the renter and appear to be consistant with the City's concerns that the Multi -Family Housing Bonds and use of tax exempt rates be passed onto the renter. For a copy of the supplemental regulatory agreement and a letter from Dominium Group, refer to pages/�/ through 15'0 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the supplemental regulatory agreement as presented. 'f Jl=iO 14P."',I,R 1,' "hi :!', di.!�:�50 -r17 'I'ir�SJ-'171'1 December 9, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3839 Pilot Knob Road P. 0. Box Box 2119 Eagan, MN 55121 RE: THOMAS LAKE HOUSING ASSOSCIATES • SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT EAGAN, MINNESOTA Dear Mr. Hedges: In accordance with our previous conversation, you will find enclosed two copies of a Supplemental Regulatory Agreement concerning the above captioned project. As we discussed, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 has imposed certain requirements on multi -family projects such as Thomas Lake Pointe, in order for such a project to avail itself of certain transition rule status concerning depreciation allowances. In order to qualify the project through its ownership entity must subject itself to both (1) a limited rate of return and, (2) rental charge limitations on all of the dwelling units in the project. Further, as you will note, the Agreement must remain in effect . until 1995 and the terms of this Agreement will not prevail if in conflict with any other previously executed agreement. I would greatly appreciate being placed on the City Council agenda on Tuesday, December 16th for anticipated adoption of this Supplemental Agreement. In the event you or 'a City Attorney have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Should you feel it necessary and/or expeditious you may have a City Attorney contact the attorney who developed this Agreement, Mr. Rick Goldstein with the Washington D. C. law firm of Lane and Edson (202/ 955-9600). Sincerely, DOMINIUM GROUP .INCORPORATED ck Wi War ce President JWS/sl SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT (the "Supplemental Regulatory Agreement") is made and entered into as of _, 1986, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, a political subdivision organized and existing pursuant.to the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Issuer"), and THOMAS LAKE HOUSING ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership, and its successors and assigns (the "Owner"). • W I T N E'S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Owner is or shall be the owner of a multifamily rental housing development located in the Issuer, known as Thomas Lake'Apartments Project, on the site described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project will be financed from proceeds of the sale of Issuer's Multifamily Rental Housing Revenue Bonds (Thomas 40 Lake Place Apartments Project), Series 1986 (the "Bonds") issued pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Law.") and pursuant to a Multifamily Housing. Revenue Bond Resolution, dated as of August 1, 1986 (the "Resolution"); and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to fund a loan (the "Loan") and to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds; and A WHEREAS, interest on the Bonds paid to the registered owners of the Bonds is exempt from federal income tax if the Project continuously complies with Section 103(b)(4)(A) or any successor provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, compliance by the Project with the Law and with Code Section 103(b)(4)(A) or any successor provision is in part within the control of the Owner; and WHEREAS, the Owner, as a condition to receiving Bond proceeds to finance the Project, entered into a Regulatory Agreement with the Issuer dated August 1, 1986 (the "Regulatory Agreement") which contains certain restrictions as to the use and occupancy of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Issuer and the Owner wish to enter into this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement prior to the date upon which ® the Project is placed in service in order to set forth certain additional terms, conditions, and restrictions relating to the construction, development, ownership, and operation of the project. - 2 - NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the Issuer and the Owner hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. The following terms shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in this Section 1: "Aoolicable Median Income" means the median income for • households of various sizes in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (i) as published periodically by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") or by any successor federal agency to HUD in publishing such data, or (ii) if no federal agency publishes such data, as derived from such data as, in the determination of the Issuer, shall be the best available at the applicable time. • "Distribution" means any withdrawal, taking or payment of any earnings or income of the Owner for distribution or other payment to or for the benefit of any of the partners of the Owner. /4 3 - "Maximum Permitted Rent(s)" means the maximum monthly amounts which may be charged by the Owner from time to time with respect to dwelling units in the Project, as determined by the Issuer pursuant to this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement. The Maximum Permitted Rents for all units in the Project shall be the aggregate monthly maximum amounts for all units (based on family size), and shall be equal to one -twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Applicable Median Income. The Applicable Median Income shall be based upon the actual number of people comprising the household occupying a unit. No unit shall be rented for an amount in excess of one -twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of one hundred forty-four percent (144%) of the Applicable Median Income. Notwithstanding the forecoing limitations on maximum Permitted Rents, in no event shall the monthly rent charged with respect to units in the Project occupied by Qualifying Tenants ® (as that term is defined in section 4 of the Regulatory Agreement), not to exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total units in the Project, exceed one -twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of eighty percent (80%) of the Applicable Median Income of such tenants as adjusted for family size. - 4 - The Maximum Permitted Rents shall be redetermined by the Issuer by adjusting the previously applicable Maximum Permitted Rents by a percentage equal to the percentage change in the. Anolicable Median Income. The Issuer shall make such redetermination(s) within thirty (30) days of the availability of the published data as to Applicable Median Income, and shall inform the Owner in writing within ten ('10) days thereafter of such redetermination. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Issuer and the Owner may adjust the Maximum Permitted Rents • by mutual consent and, in the event that the Owner shall certify in writing to the Issuer that the operating expenses of the Project (including debt service payments, taxes and deposits into reserves) exceed the rental income of the Project based upon the then -existing Maximum Permitted Rents, the Issuer and the Owner shall adjust the Maximum Permitted Rents in an amount sufficient to produce rental income from the Project in an aggregate amount adequate to pay all such operating expenses of the Project. Section 2. Regulation as to Rate of Return. The Issuer hereby determines that, for purposes of this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement, the,Initial Equity of the Developer in the Project is the amount by which the total cost of acquiring the land upon which the Project is being constructed, and of constructing, developing, furnishing and equipping the Project A - 5 - (including fees payable with respect to such constructing, developing, furnishing, and equipping) (the "Project Costs") exceeds the amount of the Loan plus any other debt secured by the Project and incurred to fund the Project Costs, as, at the Owner's optio, (a) reported to the Issuer by a certified public accountant within sixty (60) days after certificates of occupancv have been received with respect to all uni+ts in the Project, or (b) certified to the Issuer by the Owner within said sixty (60) day period and approved by the Issuer (the "Initial Equity"). For so long as this Suoplemental Regulatory Agreement shall remain in force, the maximum annual Distribution shall be limited to ten percent (10%) of the Initial Equity; provided, however, that on the date twelve (12) months following the date hereof, and on each annual anniversary date thereafter so long as this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement remains in force, the amount of the maximum annual Distribution shall be increased to an amount equal to the sum of (a) the maximum annual Distribution applicable for the ® preceding twelve-month period, as previously increased (if applicable), and (b) an amount determined by applying the percentage increase in'the Consumer Price Index as determined and published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics during the twelve-month period ending with the day immediately preceding such date to the maximum annual Distribution applicable for the preceding twelve-month period, as previously increased (if applicable). The annual Distribution shall be cumulative and shall be calculated from the date certificates of occupancy have been recceived with respect to all units in the Project; in the event that the full amount of such maximum annual Distribution is not made in any year, the amount_ ^f that portion of annual Distribution not made in such year shall. be carried forward and added to the annual Distribution to be made in future years, until made. Section 3. Reoulation With Respect to Rental Charaes and Occuoancv Charaes. The Owner and the Issuer hereby agree that the Project shall be subject to regulation with respect to rental charges made by the Owner with respect to all units in the Project, so that the rental charges for such units do not exceed the applicable Maximum Permitted Rents. LJ Section 4. Term. This Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until January 2, 1995, unless terminated earlier or extended to a later date by mutual agreement of the parties. Section 5. Amendments. This Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be amended only by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto or their successors or assigns. 40 -7- Section 6. Conflict With Other Agreements Severability. (a) It is the intent of the parties hereto that this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be supplementary to, and not a modification of, the Regulatory Agreement, the Resolution, a certain Building Loan Mortgage and Security Agreement, a certain Loan Agreement, and a certain Assignment of Leases, Rents and other Income and a certain Rental Performance Security Agreement, each of which was entered into between the Issuer and the Owner and dated August 1, 1986 (collectively, the "Transaction Documents"). In the event of any conflict between any provisions of this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement and any provisions of the Transaction Documents, the applicable provision(s) of the Transaction Documents shall control. (b) If any provisions of this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be invalid, illegal and unenforceable, the ® validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. ' Section 7. Governing Law. This Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer and the Owner have executed this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement, by their duly authorized representatives, as of the date set forth above. CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA By: Title: THOMAS LAKE HOUSING ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: its Managing General Partner `. By: 5� MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR 8 CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE RECOGNITION/CONNIE MORRISON Enclosed on page is a letter from the city of Burnsville regarding an open house from 6:00 to 7.00 p.m. on December 15 in the Media Center at Burnsville High School to honor Connie Morrison. The City Administrator is planning to attend the open house. Please make reference to the attached letter found and if any member of the City Council wishes to attend, they are certainly welcome. BLACKHAWK TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS A request was made by Darrell Holden and Mr. Doug Johnson, repre- senting Sharvest, Inc., and owner of the Blackhawk Townhouse/ Walnut Trail Apartments, be required to install an additional chain link fence for the length of the property line dividing Mr. Holden and Mr. Johnson's property. Enclosed on page is a letter from Mr. Johnson indicating compliance with that request. Apparently, members of the City Council have been aware of this on-going concern and this should help finalize that issue. FIRE STATION #4 The City has received inquiries from over 20 architectural firms that are interested in bidding the architectural services for Fire Station #4. An RFP was prepared and sent out asking that all proposals be received no later than 10:00 a.m., Monday, December 22. After the Fire Chief and City Administrator have had ample time to review these proposals, certain firms will be selected for an interview. There are two alternatives regarding the interview process. .1) City Council as a whole can participate in the final interview and review of several architectural firms or 2) One or two City Councilmembers, along with Citi staff, could conduct the interviews and make a recommendation. In any event, the City Administrator and Fire Chief will screen the initial proposals and reduce the selection to less than five for this final consideration. DALE PETERSON'S PARTY Enclosed on page is a copy of a notice that will be sent out to employees and other interested parties regarding Dale Peterson's retirement party scheduled for January 15, 1987. Please mark your calendar for this special recognition. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT Enclosed on pages through696 is a copy of the November 1986 Protective Inspections report. Please note that the City 1-61 INFORMATIVE MEMO DECEMBER 12, 1986 PAGE TWO has issued 867 single-family permits. The total single-family permits in November 1985 was 733. The total building permits are approximately the same, with 1985 actually leading by 24 permits over November 1986. HRA REPORT Enclosed on pages through /(,3 is the November status report for all assisted housing programs and community development programs in Dakota County. AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE MEETING An Airport Noise Committee meeting was held on December 10, 1986, to review the Part 150 Study, Airport Relocation Study and the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein and the City Administrator thought two (2) pieces re of correspondence might be of interest to the City Council con- cerning the airport. Enclosed is a copy of a letter that Jon received from Tim Anderson dated November 20 regarding Mr. Anderson's understanding of the corridor. Obviously the City is expressing a grave objection to Mr. Anderson's letter. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter that Jon sent to Mr. Mark Ryan of the Metropolitan Airports Commission regarding the City Council's action on November 18 defining the correct developments as the City Council enacted. These letters are enclosed on pages through /� . SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION MEETING The Solid Waste Abatement Commission meeting was held at 7.00 a.m., Wednesday, December 10, at which time Lanny Ross, represent- ing the Waste Processing Corporation, made a one -hour -plus presenta- tion on the co -composting system that his corporation is advocating for Dakota County. There was also discussion on the entire Solid Waste Abatement operation that the City will be confronting in 1987 such as, recycling, curbside, what will happen as a result of Goodwill removing their collection box and other related discussion topics. WILLIAMS BROS PIPELINE The City Administrator and Administrative Assistant Hohenstein attending the meeting at the League Office on November 25 to discuss the resolution, action and criteria for the inspection and tighter regulation of pipelines with officials from other communities. The meeting was well attended by suburban communities and it appears that legislation being introduced by representative Vento and Senator Durenberger will be closely followed and endorsed by the League of Minnesota Cities as well as the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Some of the issues discussed at that meeting include 1) monitor the Minnesota Pipeline Safety Committee, 2) determine ways to test pipelines and require proper / 5L INFORMATIVE MEMO DECEMBER 12, 1986 PAGE THREE testing, 3) review all existing pipelines to identify pipelines markers, request- copies of plans, identify the pipes that are underground and which ones could infiltrate, check with local Fire Departments for proper training, notify residents with a map of pipeline and newsletter for safety awareness, identify all past problems and, most importantly, identify the types of pipes that do exist within the municipality. The City Administrator has asked Fire Marshal Doug Reid to prepare a history of any occurences the Cityof Egan has had with Williams Pipeline Company. Enclosed on page is a brief account of what has transpired with that company during the past eight years. The City Administrator will coordinate some correspondence to U. S. legislators as well as the draft of a resolution for consideration by the City Council at a future meeting. STORE FRONT/YOUTH ACTION Early in the budget process the City Administrator shared a request from Independent School District #196 and, more speci- fically representatives of Store Front Youth Action, regarding their request for a possible match by all cities located within Independent School District #196, including the District itself for dollars that would match a grant sponsored by the Minneapolis United Way for a counselling program position. It was the deter- mination of the City Council that this request has been made by other school districts and the County and it is felt that the municipality's resources should be directed at its Police Department and not participate in all the other organizations. Apparently, the Store Front Youth Action was unable to secure a grant from the United Way and, therefore, the youth and family counsell1n position will not be funded during 1987. Enclosed on page is a letter from that agency. EMPLOYEE RIGHT -TO -KNOW TRAINING PROGRAM As the Council is aware, employee right -to -know training is mandated by State law. Dakota County Vo -Tech has dbveloped an excellent employee right -to -know training program which is being utilized by many cities and businesses in the area. All employees in the City will be scheduled to attend training sessions during the second week in January. For more detailed information on this program, please refer to a memo from Administrative Assistant Duffy enclosed on pages through 41__ City Administrator �y 163 4�. City Of '- BURNSVILLE 1313 East Highway 13, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 612/890-4100 December 3, 1986 Mr. Thomas Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 • Dear Tom: Please join us on December 15 to thank Connie Morrison for her dedicated service to the City of.Burnsville as Councilmember and Mayor, and to express best wishes and support to her as our new State Representative. An open house will be held in Connie's honor from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m, on the 15th in the Media Center of Burnsville High School. We hope you will join us for the reception and also for the first portion of the Council meeting when the accomplishments of the Burnsville City Council over the last four years will be reviewed. Sincerely, 4 X6�_ �/ Linda M. Darton, City Manager LMB/mlg /:!��4 SHAREVEST, INC. NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER, SUITE I733 7900 %ER%ES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNE50TA 55431 TELEPHONE 16121 835-0922 December 4, 1986 Mr. Dale C. Runkle City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, 'IN 55121 Re: Plat Conditions for Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments Walnut Trails Apartments Dear Mr. Runkle; Arrangements have been made to install the additional chain link fence, as requested. Thank you and the City Council for the clarificiation of interperation to install a fence or heavy vegetation. Cordially, Douglas DMJ/mes cc: Mr. Darold Holden Mr. Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mr. Paul Hauge, City Attorney Joh Y L •r , - .. 11�.. } +h, t ill` 1 t ,( `'tt !' f i 1�1f;iar hTS !{` ,i�ti rLaL Yi �'� • r _...t C' :� ,!, t,.�il'. �7{*r o` JT�Ji: �t.y�„i`l:t �"'` w�k�u`r$9 '(4 '. ` J � '. � 7. y t' ta, '• ' `t r lr i' i I re FFr .- F.p:.'lJ h rf �'f A A n�Y �! Yj ��'a'•F,r �, -1.vLN V ,,, ,l ....: '• DALE PETERSON ` "DEPARTURE° PARTY 7 , ,� 1J`"��1.1, •. y1 DALE PETERSON HAS ANNOUNCED HIS RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31,1986 WE, HIS FRIENDS AT CITY HALL, PREFER TO THINK HE'S JUST DEPARTING FOR A WARMER CLIMATE AND WILL RETURN TO US IN THE SPRING. (HE SAYS THAT}`J.1"� r(r lrsfFx, HE WILL CONSIDER SOME FORM OF AFFILIATION.) IN THE MEANTIME, WE WILL HAVE A PARTY + t A BUFFET DINNER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 151 1987 AT THE LOST SPUR 1 COUNTRY CLUB, 2750 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. SOCIAL HOUR "6:00 - 7:00 P.M. DINNER 7:00 — 8:00 P.M. PROGRAM 8:00 — 9:00 P.M. YOU AND YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER ARE INVITED TO JOIN IN THE FUN. COST OF THE DINNER IS $15.00 EACH, WHICH INCLUDES TAX AND TIP. PLEASE MAKE YOUR CHECK OUT TO DOUG REID AND RETURN IT AND THE ..RESERVATION FORM TO EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD FAGAN, MN 55122 ,'' BY TUESDAY, JANUARY 13 f,a 1 / ' •,! ' ,. •1 J - 'Y� r ,' LSA. ytiy !b '. l., li JY } t •.{ �. ,.. . , _: 1r,a:, 3,rii ' liy -7 ti r_•pi !' [i-�`-L� �'� .�.a ,DALE PETERSON DEPARTURE PARTY •� / ``.•r ! -; ,i 4:i N" , tr 11.^ •� h `- 'THURSDAY, JANUARY 15, 1987 J,t.•M.! y l l \ NAME r YES, I PLAN TO COME NUMBER COMING f3r V' a• fr 5�'I ♦ 1t �� ° NO, I CAN'T MAKE IT BUT I'VE ENCLOSED A CONTRIBUTIONr TOWARD A GIFT FOR DALE. l �f i _!: ,�• ,e fir... a j'-'�: C e.\ t�lj�"fai J •R I•� .1i_1 •'y S�� 1'+,}.e f / � • yj:l ,I �•�, 'i .x ! � i .moi ! !' t *, �'�,p �-. - 1 _ ,.r � Wit(/� k e 4,' k' , V h ♦;. i ! ! �i (( s' Y 1 (}•; .V -f.0 t , �' � / 'r!� tx , G w "n?-� +t�°v +1: i ... . `� ,J). �'{1 .1 .�.. ,�J �H ii•fh F)G:cr N Y '[;tl (; 1'. A+P',I'M-l�'+Y hl� PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 80 1 , 505 Electrical Plumbing 122 70 1.676 1. 254 RVAC 83 1,373 Water Softener 1 258 Signs 17,734.00 8,867.00 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 1 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED rrr� /5 TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 16 FOUNDATION 4 $ $ 60.00 $ $ 60.00 867 SINGLE FAMILY 48 3,819,000 17,734.00 8,867.00 104,566.50 32 DUPLEX 2 124,000 638.00 319.00 4,188.00 215 TOWNHOUSE 4 245,000 1,267.00 633.50 8,361.00 10 CONDO 0 1 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 23 COMMERCIAL 2 1,298,000 3,611.00 1,805.50 29,677.50 86 COMM/IND REMODEL 10 253,050 1,541.50 657.75 2,327.25 8 COMM/IND ADDITION 1 10,000 80.50 --- 85.50 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 11 PUBLIC FACILITIES 0 31 RES. GARAGES 0 27 RES. ADDITIONS 2 17,065 149.00 49.25 207.25 21 SWIM POOL 0 154 MISCELLANEOUS 7 72,225 557.50 160.75 754.75 1 DEMOLISH 0 2 HOUSE MOVES 0 1,,505 TOTALS 80 5,838,340 25,638.50 12,492.75 186,227.75 YEAR-TO-DATE 146,021,196 577,254.00 281,430.70 3,741,708.20 /5 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE NOVEMBER 1986 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN BLDG PERMIT : PLAN REV PERMIT i ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE FEES TOTAL FEES 12913 4130 BLACKHAWK RD BLACKHA WK L1 .B1 BLACKHAWK PLAZA $ 730,000 $ 2,008.00 6 1,004.00 $ 21,184.00 COMM NI 12842 1260 YANKEE DOODLE RD TOWN CENTER L2 B 1 TOWN CTR 100 2NQ p 568,000 1,603.00 801.50 8,493.50 COMM NI 12891 3130 LEXINGTON AVE L 37 B 5 EAG CTR PK 3 • 3M CO 10,000 80.50 85.50 COMM Al 12845 3470 WASHINGTON DR 11.1 R1, BICENTENNIAL 6TH FEDERAL LAND 4,250 50.50 ._. 53.00 COMM 11 1474 YANKEE DOODLE RD 12851 L1, B 1 BICENTENNIAL 2 SDN PLACE TANi 4,500 50.50 53.00 COMM 11 12855 4178 KNOB DRIVE FIRST COR - L 2, B 2 KNOB HILL PROF pOgATF SEgV 4,000 44.50 46.50 COMM 11 L12868 2020 SILVER BELL RD L1, B 1, DALLAS DEVEL DALLAS DEVEL 17,600 128.50 64.25 201.75 COMM It 12873 1380 CORP CTR DR L2, B2, EAG OFC PK #2 OLD STONE MORl 40,000 238.00 119.00 377.00 COMM It 12885 1325 EAGANDALE CT OAK VIEW L3, B1, EAG CTR IND PK 7 BUSINESS T 92,500 412.00 206.00 664.50 COMM 11 12892 1304 TOWN CTR DR L2, B1, TOWN CTR 70 2ND FEDERAL LAND 24,200 170.50 85.25 268.25 COMM It 12895 3410 FEDERAL DR, #102 NAT'L KARATE L1, BI, BICENTENNIAL 5 STUDIO 10,000 80.50 85.50 COMM 11 12907 1750 YANKEE DOODLE RD L1 B1 R.L.JOHNSON 2ND R.L.JOHNSON 32,000 202.00 101.00 319..00 COMM II• 12906 1380 CORP CTR DR FINANCIAL 2 4,000 164.50 82.25 258.75 COMM It L2 B2 EAG OFC PK 2ND ENERGY CONSUL • •N PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE NOVEMBER 1986 MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN TYPE OF PERMITS b OF BUILDINGS # OF UNITS YTD # UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEB FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 2 1 2 32 $ 124,000 $ 638.00 $ 319.00 $ 4,188.00 3-PLEX 0 4-PLEX 4 1 4 172 245,000 1,267.00 633.50 8,361.00 5-PLEX 5 6-PLEX 30 7-PLEX 7 8-PLEX 152 10-PLEX 20 12=PLEX 48 16-PLEX 32 OTRER` AP7-.- BLDG 144 TOTA1:' 6 2 6 642 $ 369,000 $ 1,905.00 $ 952.50 $ 12,549.00 TOTALS 7........W! PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: NOVEMBER 1985 NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS W VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES_ m 9 36 f 2,124,000 S 11,160.00 $ 4062.00 f 5.580.00 S 71,802.0' 6 -UNIT m L 012, B 00. R.L.S. #4 MYCC S 5.650,000 f 4.708.00 TOWNHOUSE 6 1 6 412,000 2,0]4.00 206.00 1017.00 12i' - OO 16 -UNIT 14.00 T •Oi N �' N m N O 16 xl 2,128.00 '•YI 1,064.00 23 .Oli 2 F••+'W Ila g Ib APTS 23 12 324 11,840,000 n m 15,199.50 448,438.01' TOTALS yd B2 23 787 IA8 1 15,154,000 1 45,721.00 4,176.50 22,860.50 556,158.0C COMM 4151 KNOB DR 252,000 817.00 126.00 406.00 5.055.50 COMM 11318 KNOB HILL PROF PK KNOB HILL EMIR 11275 3777 DODD RD L 1, B 1. VEST PURL II WEST PUBLISH 40.000 278.00 20.00 119.00 777.00 COMM 1]05 CORPOMTE CTR OR 22,687.00 1,700.00 11,741.50 96,980.50 COMM 11203 L 2-4 0 2 EAG OFC PK NW MUT'L LIFE 9,000,000 11066 2147 CLIFF RD 20,000 140.50 10.00 70.25 220.75 COMM CLIFF COMM PK FEDERAL LAND 11709 4860 BISCAYNE AVE CREAT LAKES 4,400 50.50 2.50 57.00 COMM 2.HALUY'S FIRST N O O O O a r - o m m c m 0 0 o c o 0 'o u m 00 O O o O a' O 0 O 0 O 0 O O c o c M O N C O 2 m r y C W P •n m S •N c � N S N i M W O O O m O 1n 0 b P W T P O - rm.• ' .p m m 0 0 0 0 7........W! PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: NOVEMBER 1985 NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES_ 4 -UNIT 36 TOWNHOUSE 9 36 f 2,124,000 S 11,160.00 $ 4062.00 f 5.580.00 S 71,802.0' 6 -UNIT L 012, B 00. R.L.S. #4 MYCC S 5.650,000 f 4.708.00 TOWNHOUSE 6 1 6 412,000 2,0]4.00 206.00 1017.00 12i' - OO 16 -UNIT 14.00 .00 290.00 COMM 11352 7642 5 KENNEBEC ORIN0 CONDO 1 1 16 778,000 2,128.00 389.00 1,064.00 23 .Oli 2 F••+'W Ila g Ib APTS 23 12 324 11,840,000 30,799.00 2,519.50 15,199.50 448,438.01' TOTALS yd B2 23 787 IA8 1 15,154,000 1 45,721.00 4,176.50 22,860.50 556,158.0C BUILDING PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK PERMIT 0 ADDRESS A LEGAL OWNER VALUATIONS FEE CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUPA; 11761 3565 KENNEBEC D0. L 012, B 00. R.L.S. #4 MYCC S 5.650,000 f 4.708.00 $ 760.00 S 2.154.00 i 7.922.00 cam 11759 1410 TOWERVIEV RD SPFRRY PARK NW BELL TELE 28,000 184.00 14.00 .00 290.00 COMM 11352 7642 5 KENNEBEC ORIN0 100,000 477.00 50.00 216.50 1.856.50 COMM LEDR PK L A B 3. RONALD A. HAVE 12 J0 EACAN 1ND RD 11349 L 1-4 B ], EAG LTR IND PK OPUS CORP 95,000 418.00 47.50 209.00 674.50 COMM 4151 KNOB DR 252,000 817.00 126.00 406.00 5.055.50 COMM 11318 KNOB HILL PROF PK KNOB HILL EMIR 11275 3777 DODD RD L 1, B 1. VEST PURL II WEST PUBLISH 40.000 278.00 20.00 119.00 777.00 COMM 1]05 CORPOMTE CTR OR 22,687.00 1,700.00 11,741.50 96,980.50 COMM 11203 L 2-4 0 2 EAG OFC PK NW MUT'L LIFE 9,000,000 11066 2147 CLIFF RD 20,000 140.50 10.00 70.25 220.75 COMM CLIFF COMM PK FEDERAL LAND 11709 4860 BISCAYNE AVE CREAT LAKES 4,400 50.50 2.50 57.00 COMM 2.HALUY'S FIRST DAKOTA COUNTY M�l DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 Serving People and Communities M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred Joy, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director lht' �I SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT DATE: December 4, 1986 Enclosed is the November Status Report for all Assisted Housing Programs and Community Development Programs currently being operated in your community and a summary sheet for Dakota County. If you would like to.also receive reports on other Dakota County communities, please call Lori Zierden of our staff. Enclosure ASSISTED HOUSING Status Report for Dakota County** November, 1986 Amount of Elderly Family Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing - Certificates 450 1,080 1,530 +35 Section 8 Existing - Vouchers 0 7 7 +6 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 182 562 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,081 2,157 3,238 +41 Amount of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Commercial Total Increase MHFA Home Improvement Loan 31 131 0 162 0 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 77 0 140 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 80 0 90 3 Rental Rehab 38 47 0 85 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 87 127 0 214 0 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 18 0 19 3 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan Commercial & Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 311 1,177 0 1,488 19 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 545 ,680 3 7,228 25 * + = Increase/- = Decrease **Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. 167— Status Report for the City of Eagan November, 1986 * + = Increase/- = Decrease 163 Amount of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing - Certificates 31 163 194 +3 Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0 Low Rent Housing 0 17 17 0 236 Rental 0 144 144 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 31 337 388 +3 Amount of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Total Increase iMHFA Home Improvement Loan 0 7 7 0 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 7 8 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 3 4 0 Weatherization 5 57 62 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 70 77 87 0 * + = Increase/- = Decrease 163 November 20, 1986 wumP poke 0 cauk I" ft& METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. O. BOX 11700 TWIN CITY AIRPORT MINNESOTA 55111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (812) 728-1892 Mr. Jon Hohenstein Administrative Assistant City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Jon: I received your letter dated October 22, 1986 as well as your letter of September 25, and will do my best to get to the heart of the matter as I see it. when we met in your offices on September 4, it was my understanding that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was still issuing "runway heading" departure instructions to aircraft using Runway 11R. It was at that meeting and confirmed afterward by me, that I discovered the "runway heading" was no longer being used (at least not regularly) and that FAA Air Traffic Control Tower personnel had gone to issuing departure headings in degrees (i.e. 1150, 1100, etc.). At that time I was also of the opinion that if a pilot were issued a "runway heading" instruction on departure from Runway 11R, he would stay on a 1100 heading. This, however, is also not universally true since I asked a pilot what he would do, and he stated that he would maintain a heading of 1160. Consequently, neither my opinion of what heading was being issued nor my assumption of what heading a pilot would hold appears to be based upon fact. Nonetheless, it is still the Metropolitan Airports Cortmission's (MAC) position that any aircraft departing Runway 11R remaining on or north of the extended centerline of the runway is complying with the intent of our noise abatement procedure for departures in that direction. Whether the FAA instructs pilots to use "runway heading," 1150, 1100, or a combination of these headings and others is, in my opinion, a moot issue as long as the aircraft does not fly to the south of centerline prior to the three (3) mile turn point. Further, I do not believe that this stated position of the MAC is inconsistent with that of which we have always been proponents. Additionally, I do not believe that the procedures currently being used by the FAA to keep aircraft in .!rFirc Lnr�,TION—rn4a 291h AVS. SO.—"! -!T TEREIINAL AREA—MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL INTEANATI"! -1 L Mr. Jon Hohenstein -2- November 20, 1986 the corridor (which is still their intention) deviates substantially from any other procedure they have used over the years for the same purpose --maintaining the corridor. Whether or not the FAA has gone from a 1050 heading to a "runway" heading to a 1150 could very well be irrelevant if, in fact, the intention and the result is to ensure adequate aircraft movement (runway departure capacity) while maintaining the corridor. I think you will admit that we have made progress in keeping aircraft from residential areas in northern Eagan by bringing to the FAA's attention evidence of the unintentional overfights. I also think that this is evidence of our willingness to work with you and the FAA to resolve problems of this nature. I cannot, however, promise that more can be done than has been done, only that we will continue to monitor the situation and continue to work with the FAA to ensure compliance with our stated objectives. I hope this letter does not serve to further obfuscate the facts in this matter, but if I have not been clear or addressed the issue with which you are con- cerned, please let me know. Also, I apologize for not responding earlier to your September letter, but time catches up with me all too often in this position. I will do better in the future. Cordially; Tim Atmdeerson Airport Director TA/tl 1�5 LED11 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 _ me o PHONE: (612) 454-8100 1HOMAS EGAN JAMES SMITH November 21, 1986 VC ISON THEODORELWAACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES MR MARK RYAN wor OVER ENE VAN OVERBEKE EUGENE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION clew 6040 28TH AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 Re: Corrective Elements of the FAR Part 150 Study Dear Mark: In official action taken on November 18, 1986, the Eagan City Council defined three of the corrective elements proposed under the Part 150 Study for further review with respect to noise impacted areas within Eagan. Their approval of these elements for further study was not without significant debate. The Council, in taking its action, reiterated strongly that the highest priority be placed on the reinstatement of noise -compat- ible operational standards for departures in the Eagan -Mendota Heights area. The City Council clearly asserts that the noise compatible planning and zoning which has occurred and continues to occur in the area is based upon understandings with the airport and the Metropolitan Council that air traffic would optimize the noise absorbing capacity of this area through flight track modifications for departures at or about 105 degrees magnetic. Any deviation from that procedure is contrary to well established agreements and understandings between the various agencies of the airport and the City Council. In those areas in which operational procedures cannot be used to minimize the adverse effects of noise, the City Council would consider the following three strategies, listed in order of priority: 1. Soundproof Private Residences 2. Acquire Developed Property 3. Purchase Assurance Program The Council would consider these alternatives with several qualifications. First, that primary consideration for ap- plication of the strategies be within schools and public build- ings. Second, that none of the strategies be implemented in a piecemeal fashion such that the integrity of remaining neighbor- hoods is diminished. Third, that specific consideration be given VA THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY It Mark Ryan November 21, 1986 Page Two to isolated residential pockets which are designated commercial or industrial use in the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan. Fourth, that any application of the acquisition or purchase assurance strategies be subject to review and approval by the Eagan City Council to insure that they are applied in the best interest of the City as a whole. In addition, the City Council requested a definition of all funding sources which are anticipated for application to these corrective strategies and the amount aniticipated from each. A specific response to this inquiry is requested. The Council appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Part 150 Study. The Council recognizes the regional importance of this issue and Eagan's part in it. The City has already gone to great lengths to accommodate the airport. The City Council expects the airport to honor the representations and intent of the corridor agreements and to do its part in effecting meaning- ful noise abatement. If you have any questions about this correspondence, please contact me. A specific response is requested, particularly to the matter of funding sources and magnitude. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, Jon Hohenstein Administrative Assistant JDH/jeh 167 WILLIAMS PIPELINE CO. I. July 8, 1977 - Lexington Avenue & Wescott Road - Eagan Fire Department was called to stand by while leak area was excavated. July 11, 1977 - Lexington Avenue & Wescott Road - Eagan Fire Department was called to stand by and foam area while leak was repaired. II. Spring of 1978 - Northwestern Bell replaced buried cable approximately one-fourth mile east of Lexington Avenue. At that time, Northwestern Bell claimed phone cables were damaged from leakage in Williams Pipeline. III. July 13, 1978 - At approximately 9:36 A.M. while Northern Natural Gas Company was relocating their pipeline for the new Cedar Avenue, we had a pipeline rupture that destroyed a home, damaged several others in the area, as well as cars, boats, and other personal property. One of the most difficult problems involves the shut off valve which is located several miles away. It took a period of time to get it shut off and to burn off any remaining natural gas in the line: Northern Natural Gas Company was at the scene. They were a great help in explaining to residents and the fire department what they were doing before and after the fire to restore the neighborhood to its original state. IV. Summer of 1985 - While utilities were being installed in an area approximately 1/2 to 3/4 mile southwest of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road, evidence was found of an old leak. The City of Eagan had wells in the area tested (wells were given an O.K. from tests.) It was concluded that this material possibly came from the break in July of 1977 and ran alongside the pipeline to a low area. October 31, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City Manager Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION Adminislralive Offices 5701 Normandale Road. Edina, MN 55424 (612) 926 1851 As you know, back in July, we submitted a Juvenile Justice Grant proposal to the State of Minnesota. We hoped to obtain the start up funding for a full time Youth and Family Counseling position that would be located in Dakota County. Unfortunately, I am unable to give you good news regarding the states decision. We have been turned down for the money. We did not receive a clear rational as to why our proposal was not funded. We appealed the decision on the grounds that the program duplicated an already existing successful program (ours) that had previously been awarded these funds. We were also turned down on our appeal. However, all hope may not be lost. We are still awaiting a decision from the Minneapolis United Way on our proposal for another full time counselor position for Dakota County (we had hoped to provide two full time positions) this decision from the United Way should come in mid November. We are still willing to work with you and other interested parties to jointly develop a strategy to secure funding that �•' would make this project happen. We strongly believe there is a need for these services and if the funding can be found, we would be glad to provide the services. I want to thank you again for the support you have given us and this project. Hopefully, the next time you hear from me, it will be some good news. Sincerely, Scott Beaty Assistant Director Storefront/Youth Action SB:ka Adolescent Sex Offender Program. 7145 Harriet Avenue South. Richfield. AIN (612) 861 1675 Adolescent Victim Counseling Program. 7145 Harriet Avenue South. Richfield. MN (612) 861 - 1675 Delta Place, 1001 Hwy. # 7, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 9387040 Edina Project CHarlie, 5701 Normandale Road. Edina. MN 55424 (612) 9259706 Richfield Project CHarlie. 7020 121h Avenue South, Richfield. MN (612) 861 8260 Sloretrom. 7145 Harriet Avenue South. Richfield. MN 55423 (612) 861 1675 Yru111 ACtion. 5701 Nnrmandale Road. Edina, M.N 55434 (612) 926 1 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DUFFY DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE RIGHT -TO -KNOW ACT TRAINING PROGRAM As you know, the City of Eagan is required to enforce the Employee Right -To -Know Act which was passed on the Minnesota State Legislature during the 1983 session. The Employee Right - To -Know Act is intended to insure that employees are aware of the dangers associated with hazardous substances, harmful physical agents or infectious agents that they may be exposed to in their work places. The Act requires the employers to evaluate their work places for the presence of hazardous substances, harmful physical agents, and infectious agents and to provide training to employees concerning those substances or agents to which employees may be exposed. The City has evaluated its work places and has provided written documentation in the form of Safety Data Sheets which are available to inform the employees about any hazardous substances or agents in the work place. The City also originally trained its maintenance, police, and other employees who were exposed to those harmful substances or to harmful physical conditions such as heat, etc. However, it is now time to update the original training and to provide training for employees who were not included in either the original training or last year's update. Dakota County Vo -Tech has developed an Employee Right -To -Know Program which has been utilized by many municipalities and businesses in the area. The program fulfills the requirements of training as prescribed by the State of Minnesota for the Employee Right -To -Know Act of 1983. The program features a video disk and computer-aided instruction on a television monitor. The disk is so programmed that employees while watching can go back and review certain portions of the program if they did not understand them completely. The disk includes two sides, the first side is approximately 1/2 hour in length and includes all general information and background information which is provided for all employees in the City. The second side contains specific sections which can be programmed by the employee watching the disk for individual groups of employees, i.e., road maintenance, police, clerical, etc. Dakota County Vo -Tech also provides an employee guide for each trained employee and a Certificate Of Training for each trained employee. The cost to the City includes a one time charge of $250 plus $b per employee for each time that employee goes through the training program. For this cost, the City receives the use of 17�) Employee Right -To -Know Act Training Program December 2, 1986 Page Two the equipment for a primary time of at least one week. The equipment will be left at the City of Eagan for that time. It also includes the equipment coming back when new employees are hired by the City. All written materials and the Certificate Of Completion are also included in the price. I recommend that the City participate in this program. I have personally viewed the entire training session and it is excellent for fulfilling the intent of the law. I would also recommend that all employees be assigned to complete this training, including basic office (clerical) employees who were not included in the original employee right -to -know training. I would also recommend that the members of the Volunteer Fire ,4 � Department be required to complete this training. If you have any questions regarding this program, please contact me. IIIX Administrdtive Assi f tant HND/jeh 17/ ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN;, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 16-, 1986 CITY ATTORNEY CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Squad Car Bids Item 2. DNR Request for Special Hunt Item 3. Work Plan/January 27, 1987, MASAC Meeting Item 4. Proposal. for Office Paper Recycling Services DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 • MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY There are no items at this time to be covered by City Attorney. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Squad Car Bids --The City has received the Hennepin County bid for the purchase of police patrol cars at $11,421 per vehicle. As a part of the 1987 budget., approval was given to purchase eight (8) vehicles at a total cost of.$91,543. DID, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM. To authorize. an order for the Police squad cars through the Hennepin County purchasing, program from Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet for eight (8) vehicles at $11,421 per vehicle. Item 2. . DNR Request for Special Hunt --Mr. Jon Parker, Area Wildlife Manager for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has requested time on the agenda to discuss a proposed special hunt from December 27 through December 31, 1986. Please refer to the attached letter found on page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special hunt designated for December 27 through December 31, 1986, to accommodate hunters using muzzle -loading rifles (black powder) and/or bow and arrow. •Item 3. Work Plan/January 27, 1987, MASAC Meeting --The 'City of Eagan has received a request from MASAC Chairman Walter Rockenstein to make a presentation regarding its position on the Eagan -Mendota Heights departure corridor at the MASAC meeting on January 27, 1987. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein has prepared an outline relating to the City of Eagan's position relative to the departure corridor which is enclosed on pages /'7S through /76 for your review. It is important that the cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights work closely together in an effort to demonstrate unanimity as it relates to the departure corridor. If the City Council is in agreement with the outline as presented, the staff will prepare the information and graphics for a presentation on January 27. The City Administrator is . planning to attend that meeting and participate in the presentation along with Administrative Assistant Hohenstein. Members of the City Council may wish to mark their calendars and be in attendance for that meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To provide direction to the City Administrator regarding the outline and work program to prepare the presentation before MASAC at their January 27 meeting regarding the Eagan/Mendota Heights departure corridor. qoZ Item 4,. Proposal for Office Paper Recycling Services --As a part of the solid waste management objectives, the City has prepared a request for proposal to seek a company that would provide office paper recycling services for the City of Eagan. The only bidder is Rohn Industries which is willing to collect the paper at no cost or payment to the City of Eagan. The City's other choice is to continue having the paper collected through refuse hauling at a cost of $70 per ton once it is landfilled. It has been the opinion of the City Administrator and Administrative Assistant Hohenstein that the City set an example for community recycling and when considered that 308 of the city's waste is recoverable office paper and can be recycled, this recycling service, will demonstrate positive leadership and an example on the part -of local government. Enclosed on page/717 is a memo describing the RFP process and recommendation to contract with Rohn Industries with the under- standing that staff' will continue to negotiate modification of the proposal realizing there is no payment and that the duration of • time be for a one-year contract. If any member of the City Council would like to review the RFP, a copy will be provided at your request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the proposal for office paper recycling services as presented by Rohn Industries. City Adminis rator • • ltDEPARTMENT n^SnT2ATE OF OF NATURAL RESOURCES PHONE NO. 44 5- 93 93 FILE NO. Jon Parker Area Wildlife Manager 223 Holmes St Shakopee, MN 55379 Toi(iaHQ1H Council, c/o City Administrator Dear Council Members: December 12,1986 .This is to confirm our request to City staff that we be allowed to meet with Whe City Council at your next regularly -scheduled meeting. Due to recent controversy concerning management of the deer herd in the Minnesota valley, the Commissioner of Natural Resources is considering requesting your approval of a second special hunt on the same lands and under.the same conditions as the hunt which we conducted on November 8 and 9 and 15 and 16. The hunt would be done•by selected }n:nters using muzzle -loading rifles (black powder) and/or bow and arrow. Hunter density and orientation would be the same as before. The proposed dates at present are December 27 through 31, 1986. There may be some changes in the proposal before the meeting, so I will have to make specific details available at the meeting. I appologize for the extremely short notice of this request. We could not foresee the need for this request and we hope you will understand the Department's need to make these types of decisions quickly to meet legal deadlines for season frameworks. '• ;qncerely, n M. Parker cc: Roger Johnson Craig Cox AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER N Bti ,'oJ4t, MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: COUNCIL DIRECTION FOR JANUARY 27, 1987 MASAC MEETING The City of Eagan has received a request that it make presentation regarding its position on the Eagan -Mendota Heights Departure Corridor at the MASAC meeting on January 27, 1987. MASAC Chairman Walter Rockenstein has been following our discussions with the MAC and FAA. He believes that MASAC, as a party to the original corridor agreements, should hear presentations from all concerned parties and take a position in the issue. The City has often asserted that it is willing to air this issue in the appropriate forum. In this circumstance, Mr. Rockenstein appears willing to - provide such an opportunity, if the City considers this an appropriate forum. Each city and agency will be given fifteen to twenty minutes to make its case. I would anticipate that those presenting would be the Cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights, the FAA and MAC. Mr. Rockenstein may make presentation on ® , behalf of the City of Minneapolis if he sees our position in conflict with Minneapolis' interests. I intend to approach Chauncy Case of the Metropolitan Council to determine whether that agency would be willing to address the issue from the perspective of its regional land planning implications. If the City wishes to use this opportunity to represent its interests in this regard', 1 would propose the following work plan. Week 6-3 Meetings with John Voss and Dale Runkle to define information and graphic needs. Week 5 Request additional information from MAC. Week 5-2 Meetings with Mendota Heights, Metropolitan Council and Rockenstein to address positions and common interests. Week 4 Draft Position Statement Week 2 Meeting with Mendota Heights, Metropolitan Council, MAC, FAA, and Rockenstein to review HNTB analysis of corridor use impacts. Week 1 Final Presentation Preparation. In addition, I would suggest the basic position outlined below. I. Land Use and Evolution of the Corridor A. Standard procedures have changed over time. The City requested a left turn procedure as an accomodation for the impact of the Preferential Runway System. Various agencies and the City agreed to a 105 degree standard as the best means of using the corridor. B. The left turn departure track modification became the standard on which the Metropolitan Council and the Cities based their planning. C. This accomodation is necessary to offset the impacts of Prefernetial Runway System concentrations of traffic. II: Recent Developments A. Operations have flown beyond the accepted parameters on both sides of the corridor. B. The FAA has unilaterally altered departure procedures without regard for City and Metropolitan land planning. C. Evidence does not support the need for such a change, nor does it reveal that any official action requested it. III. Logical Approach to Corridor Procedures'- Two issues: A. First, when diverging separation is not necessary, it is obvious that operations should be directed to the middle of the corridor at or about 105 degrees. B. Second, when it is necessary to diverge, impacts of all operations should be considered. Corridor use should be optimized by placing the worst of the impacts, as shown by the Integrated Noise Model contours, equidistant from the residentialneighborhoods on either side. C. If there were a noise compatible corridor in Minneapolis, an effort would be made to place the worst of its impacts near its middle. Eagan and Mendota Heights have such a corridor and its use should be optimized but not abused. IV. Summary ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Approval or direction on the use of this forum to address the corridor and, if appropriate, approval or direction i• on the proposed Action Plan and Position Outline. I can be available for the City Council Meeting on Tuesday at or about 9:00 pm and after to respond to questions on this item. Adfinistrative Assistant MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DATE: DECEMBER 15, 1986 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FOR OFFICE PAPER RECYCLING SERVICES AS I indicated in our earlier conversation, Rohn Industries is the sole bidder to provide office paper recycling services to the City of Eagan. Due to the fact that Rohn Industries lacks an established route in the Dakota County area, they have proposed to implement an office paper recycling program including all containers and initial training and they will pick up our office paper at no charge. As you are aware, we had expected to be able to receive payment for our recycled office paper and, in this regard, the proposal is less than we expected. However, Dakota County is paying $50 per collection for the same company to take their office paper. This proposal is much better than that. We had hoped to receive a proposal from Pioneer Paper Stock, the other major office paper recycler in the Twin Cities. Unfortunately, Pioneer declined to make a proposal because they could not meet certain specifications within the proposal. I would request Council action to accept or not accept the Rohn Industries' proposal for recycling services. Although we are not receiving payment under the proposal for our office paper, it is more cost effective to have it recycled at no cost than to pay up to $70 per ton to have it landfilled. Staff estimates indicate that anywhere from 1/4 to 1/3 of the City's waste stream is recoverable office paper. Therefore, even with no direct return, the waste disposal savings would be substantial. It may be appropriate, however, for the City Council to consider directing staff to negotiate a modification of the proposal. The RFP had specified a two-year contract to assure stability for the vendor. In light of the fact that no payment is being made to the City, it might be appropriate to negotiate a one-year contract at the same rate and use one year of operations to fine tune and modify a request for 1988. Thank you for your attention to this matter. A copy of the RFP is attached to this memo for consideration by the Council if that is appropriate. A�n�istrative Assistant Attachment JH/kf J n t q s/ AGENDA REGULAR MEETING EAGAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY HALL DECEMBER 16, 1986 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES III. 6:40 - DEPARTMENT BEAD BUSINESS A. Public Works Department P,1 1. Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization, Identification of Management Issues �.1 2. Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Road Grader) p�r3. Project 455, Consider Easement Condemnation Award (Deerwood r. I Drive -Floyd Bryant) S4. Project 452, Consider Claim for Pond Pumping (Burow Pond/Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition) B. Parks and Recreation Department p.lk 1. Acquisition of Waldron Property for Expansion of Blackhawk Park 1 F.132. Establish the 1987 Parks Development Priority List IV. 16:55 - CONSENT AGENDA P.1(1A. Contractor Licenses p. 17B. Personnel Items 9C. Renewal - 1987 Off -Sale Liquor License, Big Top Wines & Spirits P.\9 D. Renewal - 1987 On -Sale Liquor License, Dougherty's �.�qE. Amusement Device License, Broadway Pizza (Cedar Cliff Shopping Center) F p,;t.OF. Approve Amendment to Development Contract Schedules (Royal Oak 1 Circle 1st & 2nd Addition) ZOG. Project 486, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (E -Z Air Park - PStorm Sewer) H. Project 490, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Woodgate Lane -Street Lights) Z$1. Speed Limit Designations/MnDOT Speed Study Request ?IpT. Project 491, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagan Hills Farms Addition) 0,16K. Project 492, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lone Oak i 2nd Addition/O'Neill Drive - Streets and Utilities) p ZL,L. Vacation of Utility and Ponding Easements, Receive Petition/Order L Public Hearing (Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition) R 1� M. Approve Revised Ambulance Contract, Abolish Local Government Subsidy V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS .!a A. Public Hearing for Project 466, Pilot Knob Road Upgrading I p 3 3B. Public Hearing for Project 479, Lexington/North.view Park (Trunk 1 Storm Sewer) A. Public Improvement Contracts 1. Change Order 112, Contract 86-1, 1986 Parks Construction Project UU (Central Landscaping) Contract 86-14, Approve Change Order 11 1 and 2 (Greensboro Addition) B. Private Improvement Contracts r.i3, 1. Contract 85-J, Final Acceptance (Haeg Addition) r.�232. Contract 86-V, Final Acceptance (Sunset 6th Addition) 3� C. Consider Amendment to City Code, Chapter 6, Section 6.42 to Change Requirements for Licensing Building Contractors 10 D. Thomas Lake Housing Association Supplemental Regulatory Agreement I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT C. Public Hearing for Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition/ P.tO Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) VI. OLD BUSINESS (o (a A. Proposed Adoption of 1987 General & Utility Fund Budget VII. NEW BUSINESS �, 73 A. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace) To Split a Duplex on Lot 3, Block 4, Rahn 'Ridge Located East of Nicola Road Abutting Vienna Lane, Part of the NE 1/4 of Section 31 f, -75'B. 1987 Liquor License, Eagandale Club C. Preliminary Plat (Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation) for d P ' Lone Oak 2nd Addition, Consisting of a Flight Simulator Training Facility Located on Approximately 82 Acres on Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition, South, of O'Neill Drive & East of Lone Oak Parkway in the NW 1/4 of Sec 1 9 s D. Preliminary Plat (William Hutner)for Pinecrest Addition Consisting of 17 Single Family.Lots and a Rezoning from A (Agricultural) to R- 1 (Single Family) for 7 Acres & a Variance for a cul-de-sac in Excess of 500' Located South of Crestridge Lane and West of Kolstad Road, Part of the SW 1/4 of Section 15 �'lls E. Preliminary Plat (Opus Corporation) for Eagandale Industrial Center No.8, for Replatting Lots. 13, 14, 16, 17 and a Part of 18, Block 5, Into 4 Newly Created Lots Located North of Lone Oak Road and West i of I -35E, SE 1/4 of Section 3 12 S F. Resolution for Fiscal Year 1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding Application 7.131 G. Consider Final Plat Approval, Lexington Hills Addition 10.133 H. Consider Final Plat Approval, Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS A. Public Improvement Contracts 1. Change Order 112, Contract 86-1, 1986 Parks Construction Project UU (Central Landscaping) Contract 86-14, Approve Change Order 11 1 and 2 (Greensboro Addition) B. Private Improvement Contracts r.i3, 1. Contract 85-J, Final Acceptance (Haeg Addition) r.�232. Contract 86-V, Final Acceptance (Sunset 6th Addition) 3� C. Consider Amendment to City Code, Chapter 6, Section 6.42 to Change Requirements for Licensing Building Contractors 10 D. Thomas Lake Housing Association Supplemental Regulatory Agreement I%. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on the agenda) X. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COONCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 11, 1986 SUBJECT: AGENDA fiNFORMATION aDnPT AGENDALAPPRC After approval .is given to the December 16, 1986 agenda and regular City Council meeting minutes for the November 24 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration:. A. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Public Works Department --The Gun Club Lake WMO has been proceding with the preparation of the required watershed management plan in anticipation of scheduling a public meeting to be held on March , 1987, to present to the public a draft plan and solicit their input regarding specific management issues that should be addressed through the completion of this plan preparation process. The WMO Board of Directors would like to identify as many manage- ment issues as possible prior to this public meeting in order to have something of substance to generate discussion and additional input. Subsequently, as one of Eagan's official representatives on this WMO Board, the Director of Public Works would like to receive any input that the Council may have regarding specific issues • of concern to be addressed. An example would be the issue already identified collectively by the Board regarding groundwater contamination and potential relationships to the Pine Bend Land- fill and the discovered abandoned disposal -site on the University of Minnesota property in Rosemount. Any other similar issues that the Council may be aware of should be provided to the Director of Public Works so that it can be addressed by the WMO Board in its preparation of the water management plan. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Identify any management issues of concern to be addressed by the Gun Club Lake Watershed Managment Organization. Item 2. Public Works Department --On 10:00 A.M. on Wednesday, December '10, formal bids were received for the acquisition of a motor .patrol road grader with snow plow attachments. This piece of equipment was to replace the 1981 John Deere roadgrader thatwas sold back to the manufacturer in July of 1986, under the guaranteed repurchase program. The $99,000 revenue from this repurchase was taken into consideration in establishing the 1987 bu get of $118,000 to replace this road grader. Enclosed on page is a tabulation of the bids received. The following is an expl nation of each line item:, Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Two 1) The extent of any and all deviations from the base bid specifi- cations are being reviewed by staff to determine the accepti- bility with a final report and recommendation being provided at the Council meeting on December 16. 2) This is the base purchase price of the machine after all major discounts had been applied. 3) This is what the City would receive for our existing 1965 Wabco road grader. 4) This is what the immediate cash outlay requirement would be for the City in the purchase of any machine. 5) This is the price that the City would be guaranteed in receiv- ing for the piece of equipment at the end of five years. This protects the City in case the road grader would turn out to be a "lemon." You will note that the two other dealers would not guarantee a repurchase price. 6) This is the value that has been estimated by staff as to what the machine "might" be worth at the end of five years for sale on the open market. 7) This bid item guarantees that the City will spend no more than the quoted amount for maintenance repair during the first five years or 6,000 hours of operations. One bidder would not bid a guaranteed maintenance repair cost to the City. • 7a) Staff estimated what the anticipated maintenance repair costs might be during the five year period based on past experience. 8) Based on the preventative and scheduled maintenance for the piece of equipment, this is the cost anticipated to be incurred by the City. These figures should be used for comparative analysis between pieces of equipment only. The lower the price, the less scheduled and preventative maintenance required. 9) Self explanatory. The length of delay for the used in stock caterpiller is necessary to outfit it with the City's required snow plow equipment. 10) This reflects what the costs would be to the City at the end of five years if the piece of equipment were to be resold, similar to a past road grader. This is an indication of what the true cost to the City would be for the purchase of any specific make of road grader.. lie Ll Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Three Additional information will be •provided by staffto help the Council evaluate the bids at the Council meeting of December 16. _ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids and authorize the purchase of the appropriate make of road grader. 3 ROAD GRADER BID COMPARISONS VEH. #112 BID OPENING 10:30 A.M., DECEMBER 10, 1986 BOERCHERT CARLSON "CHAMPION 730-A" "JOHN DEERE 770B -H - (New) (New) 1) Met Specifications No 2) Base Bid (+) $82,777.00 3) Trade In (-) 3,000.00 4) "Net Purchase" Bid 79,777.00 Resale Value I 80,000.00 , 5) _ 5 Yr. Guar. ' Buy Back (-) No Bid 6) - Staff Est. 2,904.00 2,904.00 (35% of X12) (-) 29,000.00 • Maint. Repair Costs $47,257.00 ' 7) - 5 Yr. Guar. Maximum (+) No Bid 7a) Staff Estimate 10,000.00 8) - Scheduled Maintenance (+) 3,827.70 9) Deliver Date 60-110 days lo)"Total Cost" Bid $64,604.70 (4-5-6+7+8) ZIEGLER "CATERPILLER 140G" (New) (Used) Noes Yes $87,000.00 I $132,353.00 $123,953.00 2,500.00 15,500.00 15,500.00 84,500.00 116,853.00 I 108,453.00 No Bid I 80,000.00 , 76,000.00 30,450.00 3,500.00 7,500.00 7,500.00 3,803.60 2,904.00 2,904.00 120-150 days 75-90 days, 30-45 days $61,353.60 $47,257.00 ' $42,857.00 1987.Budget _ $118,000.00 * 1986 dollars with no inflation factor applied Agenda Information Memo December- 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Four Item 3. Public Works Department --As a part of the upgrading of Deerwood Drive, it was necessary to acquire permanent and temporary construction easements from several property owners. The City was unable to negotiate the acquisition of the, required easements from Floyd and Victoria Bryant. Subsegently, it had to proceed through the condemnation process. As a result of the condemnation process, the court appointed commissioners determined that the value of the easements and rights-of-way being acquired by the City was $10,066 compared, to the $5,100 appraisal by the City and the $19,142 appraisal by the property owner. The City Attorney has requested Council approval or denial of the commissioner's award determination. If the commissioner's award is not accepted, it will be necessary to appeal this to the district court. It is the City Attorney and Public Works Director's recommendation that the commissioner's award be approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the commissioner's award for easement acquistion under Project 455 (Deerwood Drive) to Floyd and Victoria Bryant. Item 4. Public Works Department --On February 4 and March 4, 1986, public hearings were held to discuss the proposed storm sewer outlet for Pond AP -50 (Burow Pond) located on the eastern edge of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition adjacent to the 20 acre undeveloped tract owned by Federal Land Company on the north side of Cliff Road between Scott Trail and Rahn Road. The public hearing was subsequently continued because an acceptable alignment for the storm sewer outlet could not be determined due to the uncertainty of the development of the ® Federal Land Company property, due to the previous denial of their rezoning request. Subsequently, Burow pond (AP -50) presently does not have an outlet and receives additional runoff form the recent development of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. Due to no existing outlet, the water level in this pond continues to rise to the extent that the current builder of the second office building had to perform temporary pumping to protect flood- ing of the existing parking lot facilities. Enclosed on pages -7-10 is a letter submitted by Developers Construction Incorporated forwarding a bill to the City for the temporary pumping. It is apparent that the need for this temporary pumping will be increasing with the pending completion of the parking lot for the second office building, until the permanent outlet can be completed. The staff would like Council direction as to whether the City should be responsible for continuous temporary pumping of a pond to maintain a safe elevationthat is being impacted by direct :Js Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Five Memo City Council Meeting increased runoff by the recent development of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the claim for temporary pond pumping as submitted by Developers Construction Incorporated relating to Project 452 (Burow Pond/Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition). 17, C=] November 28, 1986 LtE�:�i�'LD iiQV 2 6 i?ES DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1101 Cliff Road Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 612/890-6194 Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road PO Box 21199 n Eagan, MN 55121 pa -"r YS -.Z • Dear Tom, I am in receipt of your letter of November 13„ 1986 regarding the office building Lot 1, Block 1, Cedarcliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition. On March 4, 1986, I attended the city council meeting and served the attached letter on the mayor and council members. If you were to check the minutes of that meeting it was my understanding that if we had a flooding problem that the City of Eagan was going to pump it or have it pumped at the city's expense. On Saturday, September 20, 1986 and Sunday, September 21, 1986 we had an incredible rainfall and the water from the ponding area rose to within 20 feet of the office building. I called the police department and water works department and was unable to get any assistance. I contacted the Astleford • Company and they immediately took care of the problem, therefore I would like you to authorize payment of $3,105.00 made payable to M. G. Astleford Company, Inc. Tom, with regard to the third paragraph in your letter stating our project is generating the water problem, this is incorrect, if you look at your water shed map it indicates that it is Federal Land and also the surrounding properties are creating the overflow. I would appreciate your help in this matter. c re �yours,� nia. ae'anae resi6Yent' EVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. enclosure cc: M. G. Astleford Jim Durning March 4, 1986 DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1101 Cliff Road Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 612/890-6194 The Honorable Bea Blomquist & Council Members City of Eagan re: Petitioned Storm Sewer Cedar Cliff Park Addition Dear Honorable Mayor & City Council Members, Cedar Cliff Partnership has built one office building at 4590 Scott Trail and is in the process of building our next office building at 4580 Scott Trail. The elevations were set based on city engineering approval and building inspection department. We were advised that if we receive a 100 year rainfall that the parking area would fill up and go onto our parking lot to approximately 2 to 3 feet and would receed through the purposed storm sewer system, if our petition for the installation of a storm sewer system is denied Cedar cliff Partnership will look to the city for any losses and damages as a result of any potential flooding therefore I would appreciate having our petition. sjyecnfidlly yoprs, en/ *I Spaand"e — - AV CUIFFF PARTNERSHIP Durning CLIFF PARTNERSHIP b :na cc: M. G. Astleford Reese Chezik Paul Hauge 11 M.G. Astleford Company, Inc. CONTRACTORS 1200 West Highway 13 890-6300 Burnsvi8e, Minnesota 55337 Developers Construction 1101 E. Cliff Road Burnsville, MN 55337 0045011 INVOICE DATEOctober 2,1986 For equipment and operators furnished at Scott Trail & Cliff Road to pump water: ® Sunday September 21 — and Friday September 26,1986 Foreman w/pickup — deliver pump 6" Diesel Pump w/hoses Operators to service &'supervise pumping Premium Time on Sunday 6" Tractor PTO Driven Pump Tiltbed truck w/driver (to move Pumps) 3 hours @ $50.00 $150.00 25 hours @ 35.00 875.00 25 hours @ 25.00 625.00 111 hours @ 25.00 275.00 19 hours @ 45.00 855.00 5 hours @ 65.00 325.00 $3,105.00 1a 'INANCE CHARGES: 9 INANCE CHARGES ON DEBT BALANCES. 30 DAYS OR OVER ARE COMPUTED AT THE RATE IF 2% PER MONTH, WHICH IS AN ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE OF 2496. PAYMENT SHOULD BE 1ADE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INVOICE DATE TO AVOID FINANCE CHARGES. 0 �5 Council Minutes March 4, 1986 RAHN RIDGE - TRUNK STORM SEWER - PROJECT #465 6100.9 The public hearing concerning Project #465 consisting of trunk storm sewer improvements for Rahn Ridge area was then convened by the Mayor. Mr. Colbert and Mr. Hansen detailed the project, including the proposed improvements to be constructed and the projected assessments. There were no objections to the project, and after discussion, Wachter moved, Egan -seconded the motion. to close the public hearing and approve Project $465 and authorize .the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. All members voted yea. BUROW POND - STORM SEWER OUTLET - PROJECT #452 - The next public hearing convened by Mayor Bea Blomquist consisted of Burow Pona storm sewer outlet improvements for Project #452. A petition had been submitted by Loren Spande, the developer of Lot 1, Block 1, Cedar Cliff Commercial Park 2nd Addition requesting a feasibility study for the Burow Pona outlet and Mr. Colbert and Mr. Hansen were present to explain the proposed improvements. A public hearing was held. an February 4, 1986 at which time the Council received a. letter of concern from Federal Land Company, owner of property impacted by the various alignment alternates, objecting to timing and location of the outlet. Several alternates were discussed, including the extra depth for additional cost involved under Alternate 2 as opposed to Alternate 1. Because of concerns about going through the park land and the potential tree loss, Alternate C and D were also prepared which would involve greater expense. Mark Battis, attorney with Federal Lana Company, appeared and reviewed two letters of February 4 and February 28, 1986, explaining the objections of Federal Lana Company. He stated it would be premature for Federal Lana property to install the improvements and also the uncertainty of the internal street alignment. He requested the project be deferred. Mr. Colbert stated the concerns by the developer of the Cedar Cliff Commercial Addition and Loren Spande was present, also expressing such concerns regarding the possibility of greatly increased run-off into Burow Pond. After extensive discussion, Smith moved, Egan seconded the motion to close the public hearing and direct the staff to work with the developer to attempt to provide an acceptable alternative, with the understanding that staff will continue to monitor the water level of Burow Pond, noting the possibility that the improvements may be premature at the present time. All councilmembers voted yes. 5 • Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Six Memo City Council Meeting DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS cont'd. B. PARRS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT: Item 1. Parks and Recreation Department --Parks and Recreation Director Vraa has negotiated a purchase price for the Waldron property which adjoins Blackhawk Lake on the northeast side. This property will provide shoreline and trail access for Blackhawk Park. For additional information and the specifics on the purchase price and land acquisition, refer to the enclosed memo found on page /71_�, ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or disapprove the acquisition of the Waldron property for the expansion of Blackhawk Park as presented. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL TOM HEDGES, CITY AD3IINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1986 RE: ACQUISITION - KATHY WALDRON PARCEL - BLACKHAWK PARK At the November Council meeting, the City Council approved Staff to proceed with negotiations with Ms. Waldron for the parcel on the north side. of Blackhawk Lake. Staff has recently met with Kathy Waldron to discuss this acquisition. At the time of the discussion with the owner, it was disclosed t that in addition to the $8,719.00 in remaining assessments on the parcel, the parcel was also subjected to approximately $10,890.00 of unpaid taxes and assessments for years previous to 1986. The 1986 taxes and assessments of $2,292.00 remains outstanding. City Staff has had several conversations regarding the value of this particular parcel. However, since the City is without benefit of a legal survey, we have only been able to determine the size of the parcel calculations based on preliminary figures. These calculations now estimate, that while the parcel may have at one time been as large as eight (8) acres, due to an increase in the ordinary high water elevation to 790.3, the size of the parcel is now 4.5 acres. Based on this, Department Staff is recommending an offer price of $46,500.00. The Seller would be responsible for paying, all taxes and remaining assessments on the parcel. Further, that the seller be responsible for ® providing for a registered property abstract. The current owner is requesting a closing date of December 30, 1986, in order to minimize impact to her as a result of recent changes in the federal tax code affecting capital gains. FOR COUNCIL ACTION To approve/disapprove of the offer of $46,500.00 for the Kathleen Waldron Parcel. KV/bls /v Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Seven Memo City Council Meeting Item 2. Parks and Recreation Department --The Advisiory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the 1987 Parks Development Program and has categorized all construction priorities for the parks. For a copy of the 1987 Parks Development Priorities refer to pages through The Director of Parks and Recreation, n behalf of the Advisory Commission, is requesting action by the City Council so that design and development can begin on those parks as listed. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To establish the 1987 Parks Development Priority List as modified or recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KEN VRAA DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 13, 1986 SUBJECT: 1987 PARKS DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES In order that preparatory work, in anticipation of 1987 parks development program can begin, the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission has reviewed the parks and project list for recommendation of an 187 program. At the October meeting, the commission recommended the following as priority projects for 1987. Project Priorities - 1987 Construction priorities for parks are as follows: (A) Design and development: 1. Thomas Lake 2. O'Leary Park 3. Lakeside Park 4. Carnelian Park 5. Vienna Woods Construction Contracts - • (a) Tennis court construction for: 1. Ridgecliff Park 2. Walnut Hill 3. Blue Cross/Blue Shield 4. O'Leary 5. Ron's (resurfacing) (C) Hockey Rink Lights for: 1. Quarry (2) 2. Blue Cross/Blue Shield (2) 3. Pilot Knob (1) Hockey Rink Construction - City forces Blue Cross/Blue Shield (2) Corry Park (2), Pilot Knob Park (1) (D) Shelter Buildings: 1. Quarry Park 2. Blue Cross/Blue Shield 3. Carnelian (warming hose). /,7/ Commission also recognizes that additional work in terms of landscaping plans for parks constructed, under the 86 contract, would also be prepared and implemented during the year,. With the grading of the Bur Oaks Addition, Bur Oaks Park grading was also part of the development agreement, and staff will be preparing an improvement contracts for this particular park as well. Yet to be determined is the prioriety of installation of playground equipment at approximately 11 locations of which 5 are to be selected for eventual installation. Council Action - It would be appropriate for accept the commission's recommendation prior'ti(1," s and concur with this project list. Director Parks and Recreation KV/cks /5 the City Council to s for '87 project ,• • Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Eight There are thirteen (13) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. CONTRACTOR LICENSES A. Contractor Licenses --Pending the additional review of contractor licensing proposed at the time of the fee schedule review, there are no contractor licenses submitted for approval at this time. 14 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City,Council Meeting Page Nine PERSONNEL ITEMS B. Personnel Items --There are three (3')`, items to be considered under Personnel Items at this time. 1,. Seasonal Skating Rink Staff --The following persons are recom- mended for hire by Recreation Supervisor Peterson as seasonal, part-time skating rink staff members: RETURNING STAFF EXPERIENCED SUMMER STAFF NEW STAFF Jon Cudo Brent Eichten James Gilbertson Tricia Gilbertson Rebecca Latzke Kim Opatz Richard Robohm Adam Wortman Ben Anderson Susan Lindblade Gina Penn Tamara Sova John VonBank Jason Bellanti Robb -ie DeRosier John Doran Matt Dow Kevin Duffy Tim Gill Marjorie Hrimnak Tom McNuklin Robert Merrill Dale Otto Dawn Rapp Brent Tait ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of the above listed personnel as seasonal, part-time skating, rink staff members for the 1986-87 skating season. 2. Temporary Part-time Clerk -Typist (Planning) --The City has • received a letter of .resignation from Denise Christensen, the temporary clerk -typist in the Planning Department, effective December 19, 1986. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation of Denise Christensen and to authorize advertisement for her replacement for the temporary clerk -typist position in the Planning Department. 17 • Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting. Page Ten 3. Appointment of Doug Reid as acting Chief Building Inspector -- Dale Peterson's resignation/retirement as Chief Building Official is effective December 31, 1986. It is the recommendation of the City Administrator that Doug Redd, Assistant Chief Building Official, be appointed as acting Chief 'Building Official until a replacement is selected for that position. it has been customary that the City increase the assistant's salary by 108 while assuming the responsibilities as acting Chief Building Official. The 108 increase would reflect the 1987 rate of compensation. The City Administrator will brief the City Council as a part of additional information at the end of the meeting regarding the vacancy of Chief Building Official. ACITON TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve and designate Doug Reid as the acting Chief Building Official with a 108 adjustment to his normal salary effective January 1, 1987. ►L Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Eleven Memo City Council Meeting RENEWAL 1987 OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR BIG.TOP WINES & SPIRITS C. Renewal - 1987 off -,sale liquor license for Big Top Wines & Spirits --In November 1986, an off -sale liquor license was granted to Sidco, Inc. in the name of Big Top Wines & Spirits. Because the renewals were considered in October, it will be necessary to consider a renewal of the off -sale liquor license for Sidco effective 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a renewal of the off -sale liquor license for Sidco, Inc. is the name of Big Top Wines & Spirits for 1987. RENEWAL 1987 ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE FOR DOUGHERTY'S D. Renewal - 1987 on -sale liquor license for Dougherty' S --The on -sale liquor license for Dougherty"s, in the name of Robert Dougherty, was granted in November 1986..Since renewals were enacted during October 1986, it will be necessary to consider the renewal for this on -sale liquor license effective January 1, 1987. This application is in order for renewal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the on -sale liquor renewal for Dougherty's in the name of Robert Dougherty. AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE/BROADWAY PIZZA E. Amusement device license for Broadway Pizza --Broadway Pizza has recently purchased Slicers Pizza in the Cedar Cliff Shopping Center. Twin City Novelty has made application to add two (2) video games at that restaurant. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amusement device license to allow for the installation of two (2) video games at Broadway Pizza. i9 Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twelve Memo City Council Meeting APROVE AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT SCHEDULES (ROYAL OAK CIRCLE 1ST & 2ND ADDITIONS) F. Approve Amendment to Development Contract Schedules (Royal Oak Circle 1st and 2nd Additions) --The progression of the Royal Oaks Circle apartment complex was delayed by the developer due to difficulties in obtaining final funding from HUD for the con- struction of this development. The developer has subsequently been approved for revenue bonds through the City of Eagan to assist with the progression. However, the delays that have been incurred result in the requirement to amend the development contract agreement to provide appropriate extensions of completion dates. • Subsequently, the developer is requesting Council approval to amend paragraph four of the development contracts for the Royal Oak Circle 1st and 2nd Additionsto stipulate the completion dates of October 1, 1987 for all major streets, utilities and driveways and July 15, 1988 for all remaining final restoration items. This extension request amendment has been reviewed by staff and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To amend paragraph four of the development contract agreement for Royal Oaks Circle 1st and 2nd Additions to provide for extensions on the completion dates as referenced. PROJECT 486, RECEIVE REPORT/ORDER PUBLIC HEARING G. Project 486, Receive Report/Order Public Hearing (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer --In response to a petition submitted by the developer of the proposed expansion of the E -Z Air Park, the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report providing for storm sewer facilities. This report has now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a formal public hearing to be held on February 3., 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility report for Project 486 (E -Z Air Park - Storm Sewer) and order the public hearing to be held February 3, 1987. am Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Thirteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 490, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT H. Project 490, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Woodgate Lane -Street Lights,) --The staff has received a petition from eleven of seventeen property owners on Woodgate Lane requesting the installation of street lights for this portion of Mallard Park 2nd Addition. Enclosed on page _12G is a map showing the location of the petitioners on this cul-de-sac requesting street lights. ACTION TO BE,CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report for` Project 490, Woodgate Lane (Street Lights). -0 w _ � 9pOs i � M ._s ee•zdO1m xso___ 160 ptt = I H, m M C 2 R" W m. MJ• T F �mAw l' 'J i. ^ ` $ .O�Do O Reln De ^ ` r.2 9041 1 A •T0 ••'ex yyar 6'D soa 17 J ',: CJ TOr• 7 v I Lj = \• q J V s \ i• q, •w ^' I l wn• von t.^• 3 ^r. 11 •t . �\O • T \s • • q . " w PiiTlIMES PER 1977 AER S PHOTO -----� g City of.Eagan z / Part of 015-50 ~ 4 I COMPANY EA•EVEMT PER•9004 R°. ,PAGE NO. AM. NISC, RECORDS �I f OYW. ^ 018-80 ..55• ES:: a 5E`° s ` 8:•: ::''..• :::' .::•:' )pp.�C • �<.,yF ` \ I. e'hI011N xK.Ze •'i5 5; b55: 9 n 9 X21 ).26 36 .dj., .. ........ ..: ix•'r31 •o'TA mA.sA a eiT Ti I M2�r° to d sa 3p Y Y . ,mi m 4�.ii 8 /� )OB N• S�•C •y I 4 \ )• ein I 32 q 22 �! 1 M es- - ` w 4, 145 as - 21 Us 24 0 ° " J R.eeM _ r R $ NrPdos ,ta• •_ .� 2syi C 26 C Or'J�6B ys 8 66 Z6 1800 90 MJ 9 27 C_ U N _ D C_ m a�C.\v R2.29 itl Mae59YC. mgSO )0 \ Y96 e0 6177 w e , LLARD i 1021 RTum ...8 03 . R•OeEYI 5•�'2e•E. ]Oe.SD a G•RPAED o DRIVE C) DRIVE 1 9 w9.10 8.422. 1 "45 mD69t Dei 1 Y.0 1 90.14 •0.•S� 61.76 Ye'A2'xE' • e -s2' 4. ^• s 2 90 BO 890Sr I 5 o r -•M. RD.ST ,80 v0,2o ^ •O v° •o ^ •0 1ee.m t• n nPa ue• . ), e• s ew1 -Re« •y uu. I w 8` .y15 t.-ewr •gw4m e0 16 -- w 117 13 OUTLOT ,••7 2I 8 - 1IB A •-�'�•9+'iii 'T. str.N.F 24 y,oe�[ °G O. v M NNN LL CJ v I Lj = -`•• 8 .. Ra � � • •° •IIS • wn• von t.^• 3 ^r. PiiTlIMES PER 1977 AER S PHOTO -----� g City of.Eagan z / Part of 015-50 ~ 4 I COMPANY EA•EVEMT PER•9004 R°. ,PAGE NO. AM. NISC, RECORDS �I f OYW. ^ 018-80 ..55• ES:: a 5E`° s ` 8:•: ::''..• :::' .::•:' )pp.�C • �<.,yF ` \ I. e'hI011N xK.Ze •'i5 5; b55: 9 n 9 X21 ).26 36 .dj., .. ........ ..: ix•'r31 •o'TA mA.sA a eiT Ti I M2�r° to d sa 3p Y Y . ,mi m 4�.ii 8 /� )OB N• S�•C •y I 4 \ )• ein I 32 q 22 �! 1 M es- - ` w 4, 145 as - 21 Us 24 0 ° " J R.eeM _ r R $ NrPdos ,ta• •_ .� 2syi C 26 C Or'J�6B ys 8 66 Z6 1800 90 MJ 9 27 C_ U N _ D C_ m a�C.\v R2.29 itl Mae59YC. mgSO )0 \ Y96 e0 6177 w e , LLARD i 1021 RTum ...8 03 . R•OeEYI 5•�'2e•E. ]Oe.SD a G•RPAED o DRIVE C) DRIVE 1 9 w9.10 8.422. 1 "45 mD69t Dei 1 Y.0 1 90.14 •0.•S� 61.76 Ye'A2'xE' • e -s2' 4. ^• s 2 90 BO 890Sr I 5 o r -•M. RD.ST ,80 v0,2o ^ •O v° •o ^ •0 1ee.m t• n nPa ue• . ), e• s ew1 -Re« •y uu. I w 8` .y15 t.-ewr •gw4m e0 16 -- w 117 13 OUTLOT ,••7 2I 8 - 1IB A •-�'�•9+'iii 'T. str.N.F 24 y,oe�[ Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Fourteen Memo City Council Meeting SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATIONS/MN DOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST I. Speed Limit Desingations/MnDOT Speed Study Request (Miscel- laneous Streets) --With the continuedexpansion and growth within the City of Eagan, several new streets are being constructed requiring .speed limit designations to be established by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to insure legal enforcement of the appropriate speeds,. In order to get the speed limit established by MnDOT, it is necessary to request a speed study. Enclosed on pages � and Z�, is a copy of the resolution with the attached listing of streets requesting MnDOT's study and designation of the appropriate enforceable speed limits • referencing both the existing and staff's recommendation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution requesting MnDOT to perform a speed study for speed limit designa- tion on miscellaneous streets and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. • Z3 RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATION MnDOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has recently constructed or upgraded several streets, within the community; and, WHEREAS, the City would like to establish enforceable speed limits along those local streets referenced on the attached Exhibit A; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the, City of. Eagan, Dakota County, hereby requests MnDOT District 9 to perform all required speed studies necessary to designate • the proper speed limit for those streets referenced in the attached Exhibit A. Motion by: Seconded by: Members in Favor: Members Opposed: Dated: CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN ATTEST: - By. City Clerk Mayor CERTIFICATION I, E.J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of a RESOLUTION adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota on December 16, 1966. Seal E.J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan Z� • Existing state roadway to be turned back to City in 1987. MAP SECT. 1,2 1,2 3 10 12 14 15 15 16,17 17 •18 19 22 25,26 26 30 31 32 32,33 33 EBRIBIT A OF RESOLUTION REQUESTING SPEED STUDY FOR SPEED LIMITS STREET FROM TO Lone Oak Parkway O'Neil Drive T.H. 149 Northwest Parkway T.H. 149 Lone Oak Parkway Corporate Center Curve Corp. Center Dr. Corp. Center Dr. Eagandale Place Lone Oak Road Lone Oak Road T.H. 55 Frontage Road East of Trunk Highway 149 Golfview Dr. Lexington Ave. Yankee Doodle Rd. Town Centre Dr. Duckwood Dr. Lexington Ave. Krestwood Lane Duckwood Dr. Crestridge Lane Ashbury Road Blue Cross Rd. Blackhawk Hills Rd Blackhawk Rd. Highway 13 Kennebec Dr,. Nicols Rd. Silver Bell Rd Old Highway 13 County Road 30 Denmark Ave. Westcott Rd. Golden Meadow Road Trenton Trail Daniel Dr Cliff Dr. Rahn Rd. Rahn Cliff Ct. Johnny Cake Ridge Rd. Covington Lane Trenton Trail Nicols Road Cliff Road Rahn Road Cliff Road Beacon Hill Rd Z� Minnesota River Cedar Ave. Freeway Deerwood Dr. Dodd Road West Terminus Cliff Road Pin Oak Drive Rahn Road Apple Valley East End Terminus E%ISTING None None None 30 30 30 None None 30 30 40 u0 30 None None 30 30 None 45 None PROPOSED 35 35 30 30 30 30 35 30 35 35 35 35 35 30 35 30 30 30 45 30 Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page;Fifteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 491, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER_FEASIBILITY REPORT J. Project 491, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Eagan Hills Farm Addition -Trunk Utilities and Streets) --The staff has received a petition from several of the property owners to be incorporatedinto the proposed Eagan Hills Farm planned unit development currently being processed through the City under a PUD rezoning. This petition is requesting the installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer along with the installation of the interior community collector street network. All costs associated with the preparation of this feasibility report have been guaranteed in case the project is not approved as a result of the application process. Due to the extensive scope of the project and the time necessary to prepare the feasibility report, it was recommended that the Council receive this petition and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Receive the petition for Project 491 (Eagan Hills Farm -Trunk Utilities and Streets) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. PROJECT 492, RECEIVE PETITION/ORDER FEASIBILITY REPORT K. Project 492, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neil Drive -Streets and Utilities) --The staff has received a petition for the upgrading of the remaining un- improved section of O' -Neill Drive adjacent to I-494 between Dodd • Road (T.H. 149) and Argenta Trail .(Inver Grove Heights;), in addition to the installation of sanitary sewer and trunk water main facilities necessary to service the proposed Lone Oak 2nd Addition. All costs- have been guaranteed for the preparation of this feasibility report if, for some reason, the project is not approved at the time of the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 492 (Lone Oak 2nd Addition/O'Neill Drive -Streets and Utilities) and authorize the preparation of the feasibility report. VACATION OF UTILITY AND PONDING EASEMENTS L. Vacation of Utilities and Ponding Easements, Receive Petition/ Order Public Hearing (Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition) --The staff has received a petition requesting the vacation of existing ponding easements and sanitary sewer utility easements previously dedicated as a part of Outlot M of the Lone Oak Addition. This request is necessary to allow the development of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition which will be rededicating the required easements for both purposes 7� Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page. Sixteen Memo City Council Meeting in a location and alignment conforming to the proposed develop- ment of that subdivision. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate utility and, ponding easements (Outlot M, Lone Oak Addition'•) and schedule the public hearing to be held January 20, 1987. 0 Z, Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Seventeen APPROVE REVISED AMBULANCE CONTRACT M. Approve Revised Ambulance Contract:, Abolishing a Local Government Subsidy --The City has received a revised copy of the Ambulance Service Agreement, copies enclosed on pages �� through _31 , that abolishes the per capita subsidy /each community has been providing on a calendar basis for several years. It was the decision of Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital • that user rates would be adjusted to more accurately reflect capital and operating expenses. As a result of the restructuring of user fees, it was determined that a subsidy would.,no longer be required. The last ambulance agreement was adopted for four (4) years, including the years of 1985 through 1988. This new Ambulance Service Agreement will revise the existing agreement for the two (2) remaining years of 1987 and 1988. The Cities of Inver Grove Heights, South St. Paul, and Mendota Heights have all approved the agreement as presented. This action will allow the City Council to reprioritize approximately $44,,000 that was budgeted for the per capita ambulance subsidy in 1987. Through recent City Council discussion, it was determined that $30,000 would be allocated to the Fire Department to participate in the Fire Training Center that will be constructed in the City of Burnsville, and the remaining $14,000 would be • added to the contingency fund to off -set comparable worth adjustments and other expenses incurred in 1987. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Ambulance Service Agreement as revised for, 1987/1988. x AMBULANCE SERVICE AGREEMENT This AGREEMENT made and entered into effective the first day of January, 1987, by and between the cities of Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, West St. Paul, South St. Paul, Mendota Heights, Rosemount, Sunfish Lake, Mendota, and Lilydale, thereinafter referred to as "Cities", and D.R.M.H., Inc., d/b/a Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital, hereinafter referred to as "Hospital". WHEREAS, the Hospital, a Minnesota corporation, desires to provide paramedic ambulance service to the Cities, and WHEREAS, the Cities, desire to jointly assure that adequate ambulance service is available. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of mutual covenants, agreements and matters set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Nature of Ambulance Service to be Provided. ® The Hospital agrees to provide paramedic ambulance service to the Cities. 2. Duties and Responsibilities of the Hospital. As a part of its duty and responsibility to furnish ambulance service to the Cities, the Hospital agrees that it will: a. Either own or lease and operate two fully equipped paramedic ambu- lances meeting state license requirements. b. Maintain and staff each ambulance on a 24-hour basis, seven (7) days per week. c. Staff each ambulance with two (2) paramedics with National Certification. • d. Be self-sustaining without reducing the level of service to which it has agreed. 3. Fee to be paid by the Cities There will be no fee paid by the Cities for the contract period. 4. Miscellaneous Terms a. There shall be no employment relationship established by this Agreement. The Hospital, in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all times, be an independent contractor. Ambulance drivers, attendants and parame- dics performing duties for the hospital are employees of the Hospital and the Cities shall have no right to direct, control or influence their actions, nor shall the Cities in any way, be responsible for their acts, their salary or any employment benefits. Likewise, police officers, firefighters or other employees or agents of the Cities are under the sole direction of the Cities and Hospital shall have no right to direct, control or influence their actions, nor shall the Hospital in any way, be responsible for their acts, their salaries or any employment benefits. 1_y -2- b. The Hospital is required to maintain full and complete administra- tive and medical supervision and control over the ambulance service provided during the course of this Agreement. In this regard, the Hospital shall beresponsible to the patient during the course of transportation of the patient to the Hospital and agrees to maintain in force, policies of insurance as set forth in Article 6 herein. c. Except as indicated above, this AGREEMENT be amended only 'upon 60 days written notice by either party, setting forth the requested amendment before the anniversary date of this Agreement which shall be January 1. d. Any disputes betweenthe Cities and Hospital arising under this Agreement shall be settled by arbitration in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Arbitration Act of the State of Minnesota, by a Board of Arbitrators composed of three members. The Hospital shall appoint one arbitrator, the Cities shall appoint one arbitrator and the two so appointed shall select the • third arbitrator. Within 45 days of the occurrence giving rise to arbitration, the party demanding arbitration shall notify the other party in writing of such demand specifying the matter to be submitted to arbitration and the name of the arbitrator selected by the party making such demand. Upon receipt of such writ- ten notice, the other party shall have ten (10) days in which to select an arbitrator, and to specify any matters which such party desires to have sub- mitted to arbitration and to notify the other party in writing of such selec- tion, and the two arbitrators so selected shall have ten (10) days in which to select a third arbitrator. In the event the third arbitrator is not so selected within said ten (10) days, such third' arbitrator shall be appointed by the District Court of Dakota County, Minnesota, upon application of any party after at least eight (8) days' notice to the other parties of such application. Arbitration shall be the exclusive remedy for the settlement of disputes arising under this Agreement and no action at law or in equity shall be instituted by any party hereto other than to enforce the award of the arbitrators. 5. Terms of Contract This contract shall commence on January 1, 1987, and shall be in full force and effect for two (2) years, with the anniversary date being January 1 of each year, subject to the provisions herein contained. 6. Insurance and Hold Harmless. a. The Hospital during the term of this Agreement, agress to maintain in force general liability, auto liability and property damage insurance with minimum limits of $300,000 per person, $500,000 per accident, and $100,000 per occurrence for property damage with such insurance policies to name each city as an Additional Named Insured. A Certificate of Insurance shall be filed with each City. b. The Hospital agrees to maintain in force the proper Worker's Compensation Insurance for its ambulance service employees. c. The Hospital agrees to hold harmless each City from any and all claims or legal action resulting from operation of the ambulance service. 3(D -3 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement, con- sisting of three (3) pages the day and year first above written. DIVINE REDEEMER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CITY OF By r. -&V_ -e-.� By A ministrator By Chairman of the Board • 151 29 City and November 25, 1986 Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Eighteen Memo City Council Meeting PROJECT 466, PILOT KNOB ROAD UPGRADING A. Pubic Hearing for Project 466 Pilot Knob Road Upgrading -- This project provides for the upgrading of Pilot Knob Road (C.H. 31) to a five lane urban road section (curb and gutter) with related storm sewer facilities from I -35E to Rebecca Lane (one-half mile from Apple Valley). This project also proposes to upgrade portions of Diffley Road (C.H_ 3'0) and Cliff Road ('C.H. 32') approximately ; mile in either direction of their intersection with Pilot Knob Road. A public informational meeting was held at City Hall on December 3, 1986. Approximately 200 letters were sent to all property owners who were adjacent to any proposed. construction (whether or not they were to be assessed) informing them of this informa- tional meeting. Approximately 125 persons were in attendance at that meeting where City and County staff explained the project in detail. Before the City can approve a cost participation agreement with the County, necessary for the construction of Pilot Knob Road, it is necessary that this project be discussed and approved at a formal public hearing because of the proposed assessments anticipated with this project necessary to help finance the City's cost of this county road project. 171 ` public hearing notices were sent to only those property owners who are proposed to be • assessedunder this feasibility report for either street improve- ments or storm sewer lateral. Because of the detailed presentation that was provided at the December 3 informational meeting, the staff will provide an abbreviated presentation and be available for any questions that the Council or affected public may have. Due to the length of the feasibility report, it is being provided to the Council under separate cover for their information and review during the public hearing. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve Project 466, Pilot Knob Road - Streets and Storm Sewer. 3v Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Nineteen FOR PROJECT 479 B. Public Hearing for Project 479, Lexington/Northview Park ('Trunk Storm Sewer) ---If the pending final plat approval of the Lexington Hills Addition and the Lexington Square 6th Addition, in addition to the scheduled upgrading of County Road 43 (Lexington Avenue) in two years, it is necessary to install that portion of the trunk storm sewer system from Northview Park to McCarthy Lake within Patrick Egan Park. On November 18, the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing to be held on December 16. Enclosed on pages 3l through � is a copy of that feasibility report for the Council's information and reference during this public hearing.. All notices have been: published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners who are proposed to be assessed under' this project. The consultant and staff personnel will be available to describe this project in further detail and to answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 479 (Lexington/Northview Park - Trunk Storm Sewer) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications. 33 REPORT ON LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK ®. (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT No. 479 FILE No. 49401 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS R ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 3f� Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.636.4600 November 20, 1986 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Lexington Avenue/Northview Park (Pond JP -29, JP -34 Outlet) Trunk Storm Sewer Project No. 479 File No. 49401 Dear Mayor and Council: ORo G. 80.'.. RE Ruder W. R..,. Y.E. J=IPh C AnMdik. Y.E. Bra✓lwd A. L.bm, P.E. Rirhanl E. TWrrm P.E. Juma C. Obun, P.E. Gk.. R. Cwk, P.E. Krish A.'Gwdun, Y.E. Th.. E. N.Jn. P.E. R.Aard'W. P=wr, P.E. Robin G. 5[hanlrhr. P.E. M.M. L. Sw &, P.E. Dt wM C. B.q.al. P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. Mart A. Holuon. P.E. T,d K. FWd, P.E. WhM T. Raulma .. P.E. Rubin R. PlelJnk, P. E. David O. Lwkole, P.E. Thom= W. l4lrnun, Y.E. MRharl C. LT.eh. P.E. Kart. L. Willa. P.E. Jamas R. Muland. P.E. Kr mh P. Amlrnon, P.E. Kwh A. Barhmonn. P.E. Murk R. Raul• P.E. Robin C. Ruuek. A.I.A. Th.. E. An,=. P.E. Svu L. Too.,. P.E. Charts A. &wk. Leo M. P. ehk, Huns. M. Obun Sown M. Ederlln Enclosed is our report for Lexington Avenue /Nor thview Park (Pond JP -29, JP -34 Outlet), Project No. 479. This report covers trunk storm sewer improvements and includes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at.a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BOO'NEESSTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK t: ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH/aes I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson ^ Daaattte: November 20, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: / G2o JJ unYX.�i¢ Department of Public Works Date: P-o2f4r (0 0681e 35 30 Year SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of gravity storm sewer out- lets for Ponds JP -29 and JP -34 as designated in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. These outlets are required at this .time due to the proposed develop-. ments of Lexington Square 6th Addition (Northview Park Road) which will convey run-off to Pond JP -34 and Lexington Hills Addition which will convey run-off to Pond JP -29. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Storm Sewer Plan for the City of Eagan with one exception. The exception being that 40 its proposed to construct the storm sewer .outlet from Pond JP -34 (located in Northview Park) based on a 5 cfs outflow (42.7 acre-feet of storage) as opposed to 10 cfs outflow (30.0 acre-feet of storage) as recommended in the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. The reduced outflow results in a HWL of 892.6 which the impact to the park is shown on the attached drawing. As shown, only the parking area would be temporarily under water during a 100 year event which is not felt to be significant. This project can .best be carried out as one contract. ® DISCUSSION: Storm sewer proposed herein includes constructing gravity storm sewer outlets from Pond JP -29 and JP -34 to Pond JP -9 as shown on the attached drawing. Pond JP -29 is located northeast of Lexington Hills Addition and will receive its storm water run-off. Presently Pond JP -29 is receiving storm water run-off from the existing storm sewer in Lexington .Avenue which extends south from County Road 30 and is located in Lexington Hills Addition. Pond JP -34 which is located in Northview Park presently receives storm water runoff from only that area which is directly tributary to it. Design considerations for each pond is listed below: Page 1. 068le Mlr NWL RWL Storage Pond Elevation Elevation Volume Outflow JP -29 926 945 52.4 Ac. Ft. 1.3 cfs JP -34 894 892.6 42.6 Ac. Ft. 5.0 cfs Storm sewer pipes range in size from 18" RCP to 42" RCP as shown on the attached drawing. EASEMENTS: The proposed storm sewer is for the most part located within City of Eagan park property except for that storm sewer located within Parcel 017-54. However, Lexington Hills Addition which is being platted at this time is located within Parcel 017-54 and a condition of its approval is that the required easements for this project be dedicated. Listed below is the ease- ment required for this project. Permanent Temporary Parcel Easement Easement SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 0.9 acre 4.3 acre AREA TO BE INCLUDED: Parcel 010-53 NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, 2 Block 1 Page 2. O68le 3� C 10 ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA NW 1/4 Section 23 SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 012-26 (Northview Park) Parcel 010-50 Parcel 014-26 (Part of Northview Park) Parcel 020-50 Parcel 010-28 Parcel 012-52 (Northview Park) Parcel 020-54 (Northview Park) Parcel 013-52 (Northview Park) Parcel 010-53 NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, 2 Block 1 Page 2. O68le 3� C 10 I COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost is $362,990 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right-of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are es- timated at 30 percent and include legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to levied against the benefited proper- ty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral assessment costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the latest bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. It is proposed to assess those parcels their trunk area. stormsewer as- sessment which have not previously been assessed and benefit from this prof- ect. It is also proposed to assess the cost of the north -south 27" RCP storm sewer included entirely within the future street right-of-way as a. lateral. This storm sewer is designed to convey run-off directly from Parcel 017-54 to • the east -west trunk storm sewer and, therefore, its cost is proposed to be as- sessed entirely to Parcel 017-54. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report and apply to this project area as follows: TRUNK AREA STORM SEWER Single - Family 0.050/sq.ft. Multi - Family 0.064/sq.ft. Page 3. 068le 39 REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of the project are as follows: Trunk Lateral Trunk Assessment Lateral Assessment Project Cost Revenue $333,180 29,810 $362,990 The anticipated project deficit is $56,105. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 0681e Page 4. 3� $277,075 29,810 $306,885 Balance —$56,105 November 18, 1986 December 16, 1986 Winter, 1987 Spring, 1987 Summer, 1987 Fall, 1987 Spring, 1988 40 n LJ APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SE14ER PROJECT NO. 479 40 L.F. 42" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $54/l.f. $ 2,160 950 L.F. 36" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' deep in place @ $78/l.f. 74,100 80 L:F. Jack or auger 36" RCP storm sewer @ $250/l.f. 20,000 1,150 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $38/l.f. 43,700 • 400 L.F. 27" RCP storm sewer 20'-30' deep in place @ $68/l.f. 27,200 650 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $26/l.f. 16,900 500 L.F. 18" RCP storm sewer 10'-20' deep in place @ $42/l.f. 21,000 870 L.F. 12" RCP storm sewer 0'-10' deep in place @ $20/l.f. 17,400 15 Each Standard 4' diameter MH with casting @ $1,000/each 15,000 110 L.F. Manhole depth greater than 8' in place @ $70/l.f. 7,700 1. Each 42" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $1,200/each 1,200 1 Each 18" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $400/each 600 1 Each 12" RCP flared end section w/trash guard @ $400/'each 400 20 C.Y. Rip rap @ $100/cu.yd. 2,000 LUMP SUM Clear and grub trees @ $1,000 1,000 ® 10 Acre Seed w/mulch and fertilizer @ $800/acre 8,000 300 C.Y. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10/cu.yd. 3,000 4,560 L.F. Mechanical trench compactor @ $1/l.f. 4,560 Total $265,920 + 5% Contingencies 13,300 $279,220 +30% Legal, Engrng., Admin. 5 Bond Interest 83,770 TOTAL ................ $362,990 Page 5. 068le ,�jl A. TRUNK AREA Parcel Description NW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 012-26 NP (1) Parcel 014-26 NP (1) Parcel 014-26 Parcel 010-28 Parcel 020-54 NP (1) NE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-04 SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-50 Parcel 020-50 Parcel 012-52 NP (1) Parcel 013-52 NP (1) Parcel 010-53 Parcel 017-54 SE 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 010-78 Kirchner Plaza Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 B. LATERAL BENEFIT Parcel Description SW 1/4 Section 23 Parcel 017-54 068le APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER PROJECT NO. 479 Area Assessable Rate/ Total (Sq.Ft.) Credit Area Sq. Ft. Assessment 396,900 Street 20% 317,520 $0.05 $15,876 132,000 -- 132,000 0.05 6,600 104,000 -- 104,000 0.05 5,200 141,230 Large Lot 60,050 0.05 3,002 106,500 -- 64,000 0.05 5,325 64,000 -- 64,000 0.05 3,200 36,672 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 36,672 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 1,296,900 Pond 84,000 970,320 0.05 48,516 Street 20% 434,260 Street 20% 347,400 0.05 17,370 1,685,640 Street 20% 1,348,510 0.05 67,425 1,584,000 Street 20% 1,267,200 0.064 81,101 504,000 Street 20% 403,200 0.05 20,160 16,511 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 16,511 Large Lot 16,500 0.05 825 Total Trunk Area 277,075 (1) NP - Northview Park Total Assessment Page 6. $29,810 • � I N � I o o � ° I I S R / o Q • IIW 0If1 y 1• 1 a Oy 9A 6 � V L BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK do ASSOCIATES, INC. (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) Engineers do Architects TRUNK STORM SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: NOV. 1988Comm. 49401 P'ROJ. No. 479 OJ y I N - c< N c 97w 1 1 y m - A 0 O Z m w N m ; A Q = O o • � I N � I o o � ° I I S R / o Q • IIW 0If1 y 1• 1 a Oy 9A 6 � V L BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK do ASSOCIATES, INC. (POND JP -29, JP -34 OUTLET) Engineers do Architects TRUNK STORM SEWER St. Paul, Minnesota EAGAN, MINNESOTA Date: NOV. 1988Comm. 49401 P'ROJ. No. 479 LEXINGTON AVENUE/NORTHVIEW PARK (POND JP-29,JP-34 OUTLET) TRUNK STORM SEWER ASSESSMENTS EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: NOV. 1988 Comm. 49401 I I 1f PROJ. No. 479 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty IC 485 C. Public Hearing for Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition/ Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) --With the continued phased development of the Lexington Square 6th Addition, it will be necessary to upgrade Northview Park Road from Lexington Avenue to the east line of the park property, including the installation of appropriate utilities. On November 18, the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled the public hearing to be 'held on December 16. Enclosed on pages -V5 through � is a copy of the feasibility report ® for the Council's information and reference during this public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all property owners proposed to be assessed under this project. Consultant and staff personnel will be available to discuss this project in detail and answer any questions that may arise. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 485, Lexington Square 6th Addition/ Northview Park Road (Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detail plans and specifications. ?Ar • REPORT ON LEXINGTON SQUARE 6th ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY & STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 FOR EAGAN, MINNESOTA •:. FILE No. 49405 BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS & ARCHITECTS ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 05 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. 2335 W. Trunk Highway 36 St. Paul, MN 55113 612.6364600 November 6, 1986 Engineers & Architects Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Lexington Square 6th Addition (Northview Park Road) Street and utility Improvements Project No. 485 File No. 49405 Dear Mayor and Council: Ouo G. Bonnvuu. P.E. Naber W. Nwrnr, P.E. Ja ,h C, Andrrlik. P.E. Bradford A. Lanbem P.E. Richard E. Tamer, P, E. Jany, C. Glean. P.E. clrnn R. Cw ' P.E. h'rilh A, Gallon, Y.E. Thum- E. Nay.., P E. Richard W. katrr. P.E. Rab,, G. Schavchl, P.E. Marvin L. Survala, P.E. Lbna/d C. BarYardq P.E. Jerry A. Buudon, P.E Mark A. Na -an, P.E. Ted K. Field P.E. Michael T. Rdmmann. P. E, Rahrn N. Phllrllr. Y.E. Oarid0 Lwluw, P£. Th... W. Prunan. P.E. Michael C. Leach, P.E. h'aan L. Willa, P.E. JamrY R. Morand, P E. Rrnnnh P. Andrnan. P E. Erllh A, tlwhnwnn, P.F. Murk R. Rai P E. Rahn C. R.,k, A.I.A. Thane, E. Anka,. P.E. S.vn L. Ya..,. P.E. Chad,, A. Erid6un 4o M. Pawrhke llarlan M. Oh.. Swan M. Ebrdin r 1 U Enclosed is our report for Lexington Squre 6th Addition (Northview Park Road), Project No. 485. This report covers utility and street improvements and in— cludes a preliminary assessment roll. We would be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss any aspect of this report. Yours very truly, BONESTR00,R/OSSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson MAH:li • I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. J v�- �, Mark A. Hanson Date: November 6, 1986 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: 1D6partment of Public Works Date: 0439e YSo 30 Year SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of utilities and street in Northview Park Road to 1/2 mile east of Lexington Avenue. Northview Park Road abuts Lexington Square 6th Addition on its north side and Northview Park and one unplatted undeveloped parcel on its south side. Also included is upgrad- ing a small segment of Clinton Trail and Savannah Road immediately north of Northview Park Road. Northview Park Road is designated as a Municipal State Aid Street in the City of Eagan. Therefore, the plans and specifications will be prepared in accordance with Municipal State Aid standards and will be submitted to Mn/DOT ® for the review and ultimate approval. FEASIBILITY AND RECOWIENDATION: The project as outlined herein is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer proposed herein includes extending an .8" diam- eter sanitary sewer in Northview Park Road east and west from Clinton Trail. • The sanitary sewer will connect to the existing sanitary sewer in Clinton Trail located approximately 150' north of Northview Park Road. The sanitary sewer will be constructed at a proper elevation to serve the property abutting Northview Park Road and the property located south (Parcel 017-54) of North - view Park. Water Main - Water main proposed herein includes extending a 16" diameter trunk water main in Northview Park Road east from an existing trunk water main in Lexington Avenue. Also included is the extension of 'a 6" diameter main in Clinton Trail and Savannah Road north from. Northview Park Road connecting to existing 6" mains. The proper number of valves and hydrants is also included. Page 1. 0439e /1 The property abutting Northview Park Road, is located in the intermediate pres- sure zone and will experience static and residual pressures of approximately 67 and 50 psi respectively. SERVICES: Sanitary sewer and water services (4" diameter sewer and 1" diame- ter water) are proposed to be extended 15' beyond the right-of-way line to each of the platted lots in Lexington Square 6th Addition and the unplatted property (Parcel 014-26, 6 lot equivalents) in anticipation of future develop- ment. Two 4" diameter water services for irrigation and one 6" diameter sewer service are proposed to be extended to Northview Park. • STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein includes two separate lateral sys- tems conveying runoff from two low points in Northview Park .Road as shown on the attached drawing. The easterly storm sewer system will collect runoff from the backyards of Block 2 Lexington Square 6th Addition and the easterly low point in Northview Park Road. The storm sewer will be constructed along the main entrance road to Northview Park and discharge into Pond JP -34. Pond JP -34 presently does not have a storm sewer outlet, however, as part of Proj- ect No. 479 Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer, the outlet for this pond is also being proposed at this time. It is anticipated its construction will occur next spring. The westerly storm sewer will collect runoff from the westerly low point in Northview Park Road and be constructed through the undeveloped portion of Northview Park. The storm sewer will connect to the existing storm sewer serving as the outlet for Pond JP -34 to be constructed as part of Proj- ect No. 479. Street - Street construction proposed herein includes upgrading Northview Park Road to a 9 ton design thickness and a 44' width which provides for parking on both sides. An 8' wide bituminous trail is proposed on the south side abut - 0439e 2. 0439e oQ ting the park. Clinton Trail and Savannah Road will be constructed to a resi- dential design thickness and a 32' width. EASEMENTS: Permanent and temporary easements from Lexington Square 6th Addi- tion will be dedicated through the platting process. Easements required from the unplatted parcel located south of Northview Park Road will bededicated by separate document. AREA TO BE INCLUDED: ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION • Lot 1-11, Block 1 Lot 1-19, Block 2 Lot 1-3, Block 3 NORTHVIEW PARK Parcel 012-26, 013-52, 012-52, 020-54, Part of 014-26 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 010-78 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 4P Part of Parcel 014-26 COST ESTIMATE: Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report and are summarized below: Sanitary Sewer $ 61,850 Water Main 137,010 Services 48,880 Storm Sewer 105,630 Street 325,890 TOTAL ...................... $679,260 Page 3. 0439e SjG The total estimated project cost is $679,260 which includes contingencies and all related overhead but does not include any costs associated with right- of-way or easement acquisition. Overhead costs are estimated at 25% and in- clude legal, engineering, administration and bond interest. ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to levied against the benefited proper- ty. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over a period of time as determined by the City Council at the Public Hearing. The interest rates will be based upon the lat- est bond sale at the time of the final assessment hearing. SANITARY SEWER: Sanitary sewer proposed herein is considered lateral and is proposed to be assessed on a per lot or equivalent lot basis. Trunk area san- itary sewer has been previously assessed to all benefiting property under Project 365. WATER MAIN: The 16" water main in Northview Park Road is considered trunk. Therefore, it is proposed to assess the property abutting Northview Park Road the lateral benefit from trunk rate based on the residential equivalent rate. • The lateral water main in Clinton Trail and Savannah Road will be assessed en- tirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition based on its final cost. It is also proposed to assess those parcels within 1/4 mile of the trunk water main their trunk area water assessment if they have not been previously assessed. Lex- ington Square 6th Addition and property adjacent to Lexington Avenue were levied Trunk Area Water Assessments under Projects 467 and 395 respectively. SERVICES: Services are proposed to be assessed based on the total cost of each service serving that lot or parcel. Page 4. 0439e �D STORM SEWER: Storm sewer proposed herein is lateral. Therefore, it is pro- posed to assess lateral storm sewer on a front foot basis to the benefited property adjacent to Northview Park Road. Trunk area storm sewer for this area is proposed to be assessed as part of Project No. 479 Northview Park Trunk Storm Sewer. STREET: Northview Park Road is proposed to be assessed on a front foot basis based on the residential equivalent rate to all property abutting Northview Park Road. Clinton Trail and Savannah Road are proposed to be assessed en- tirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition. In addition, it is proposed, that the bituminous trail be assessed entirely to Lexington Square 6th Addition. TRUNK ASSESSMENT RATES: Trunk assessment rates in effect at the time of this report and apply to this project are as follows: WATER MAIN Trunk Area: Single -Family $1,190/Ac. Lateral Benefit from Trunk: Single Family $11.88/F.F. STREET Residential Equivalent $33.75/F.F. • REVENUE SOURCES: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are as follows: SANITARY SEWER Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $ 61,850 Lateral Assessment $ 61,850 $ 61,850 $ 61,850 - 0 - Page 5. 0439e J/ The anticipated project deficit is —$84,113. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. Page 6. 0439e • Project Cost Revenue Balance WATER MAIN Lateral $ 6,550 Trunk 130,460 Lateral Assessment $ 6,550 Lateral Benefit from Trunk 61,341 Trunk Area 96,390 $137,010 $164,281 +$27,271 SERVICES Lateral $ 51,630 Lateral Assessment $ 51,630 $ 51,630 $ 51,630 — 0 — STORM SEWER Lateral $105,630 Lateral Assessment $105,630 $105,630 $105,630 — 0 — STREET Street $325,890 Street Assessment $214,506 $325 890 $214 506 —$111 384 The anticipated project deficit is —$84,113. This amount will be financed in part from the Major Street and Trunk Sewer Funds. Page 6. 0439e • 171 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans 6 Specifications Open Bids/Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes 0439e Page 7. -53 November 18, 1986 December 16, 1986 January, 1987 Spring, 1987 Fall, 1987 Winter/Spring, 1988 May, 1989 APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 A. SANITARY SEWER 2,500 Lin.ft. 8" PVC Sanitary sewer in pl. @ $13.00/lin.ft. $ 32,500 8 Each Standard 4' diameter MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 7,600 20 Lin.ft. MH depth greater than 8' dp. $70.00/each 1,400 1 Each Connect to existing 8" sanitary sewer @ $300.00/each 300 36 Each 8"x4" wye branch @ $50.00/each 1,800 1 Each 8"x6" wye branch @ $70.00/each 70 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 2,450 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,450 Total $ 47,120 +5% Contingencies 2,360 $ 49,480 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 12,370 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER ............................... $ 61,850 B. WATER MAIN 2,620 Lin.ft. 16" DIP water main in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. $ 68,120 450 Lin.ft. 6" DIP water main in pl. @ $12.00/lin.ft. 5,400 5 Each Hydrant in pl. @ $1,000.00/each 5,000 2 Each 16" Butterfly valve and box @ $1,500.00/each 3,000 6 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 2,100 12,000 Lbs. Fittings in pl. @ $1.30/lb. 15,600 1 Each Connect to existing 16" DIP @ $500.00/each 500 2 Each Connect to existing 6" DIP @ $300.00/each 600 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/cu.yd. 1,000 3,070 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 3,070 Total $104,390 +5% Contingencies 5,220 $109,610 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 27,400 TOTAL WATER MAIN .................................. $137,010 Page 8. 0439e 5X • TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $105;630 Page 9. 0439e 6�5' C. SERVICES 2,160 Lin.ft. 4" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $6.00/lin.ft. $ 12,960 55 Lin.ft. 6" PVC Sanitary sewer service @ $10.00/lin.ft. 550 1,900 Lin.ft. 1" Type A" copper water service @ $7.00/lin.ft. 13,300 130 Lin.ft. 4" DIP Water services @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,300 65 Lin.ft. 6" DIP Water services @ $12.00/lin.ft. 780 39 Each 1" Corporation stop in place @ $40.00/each 1,560 2 Each 1644" tee in place @ $800.00/each 1,600 1 Each 1646" tee in place @ $1,000.00/each 1,000 39 Each 1" Curb stop and box in pl. @ $80.00/each 3,120 2 Each 4" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $300.00/each 600 1 Each 6" Resilient wedge gate valve & box @ $350.00/each 350 ® 2,215 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,215 Total $ 39,335 +5% Contingencies 1,965 $ 41,300 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 10,330 TOTAL SERVICES ................................... $ 51,630 D. STORM SEWER 880 Lin.ft. 27" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $34.00/lin.ft. $ 29,920 380 Lin.ft. 24" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $30.00/lin.ft. 11,400 620 Lin.ft. 18" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $26.00/lin.ft. 16,120 • 120 Lin.ft. 15" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $24.00/lin.ft. 2,880 140 Lin.ft. 12" RCP Storm sewer in pl. @ $22.00/lin.ft. 3,080 6 Each Std. MH w/cstg. @ $950.00/each 5,700 9 Each Std. CB w/cstg. @ $800.00/each 7,200 1 Each 27" RCP flared end w/trash guard @ $800.00/each 800 4 Cu.yds. Rock rip rap @ $60.00/cu.yd. 240 100 Cu.yds. Rock stabilization below pipe @ $10.00/lin.ft. 1,000 2,140 Lin.ft. Mechanical trench compaction @ $1.00/lin.ft. 2,140 Total $ 80,480 +5% Contingencies 4,020 $ 84,500 +25% Legal, Engrng., Admin. & Bond Interest 21,130 TOTAL STORM SEWER ................................. $105;630 Page 9. 0439e 6�5' APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 (1) N.P. = Northview Park Page 11. 0439e �� A. SANITARY SEWER Parcel Total Description No. of Lots Cost/Lot Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 11 $1,672 $ 18,388 • Lot 1-19, Block 2 19 1,672 31,761 SECTION 23, NW 1/4 Parcel 014-26 6 lot equiv. $1,672 $ 10,029 Northview Park .1 1,672 1,672 37 $ 61,850 B. WATER MAIN a.) Trunk Area Parcel Area Credit Assessable Total Description (ac.) (ac.) Area (ac.) Rate/Acre Assessment NE 1/4, SECTION 23 ® Parcel 012-26 (N.P.)(1) 9.0 Street 20% 7.2 $1,190/ac. $ 8,568 NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 7.5 Street 20% 6 $1,190/ac. 7,140 Parcel 010-04 7.5 Street 20% 6 1,190/ac. 7,140 SW 1/4 SECTION 23 Parcel 012-52 N.P.)(1) 29.8 Pond 2.1 ac. Street 20% 22.2 $1,190/ac. $ 26,418 Parcel 013-52 (N.P.)(1) 10.0 Street 20% 8.0 1,190/ac. 9,520 BE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 19.8 Street 20% 15.8 $1,190/ac. $ 18,802 Parcel 010-78 19.8 Street 20% 15.8 1,190/ac. 18,802 $ 96,390 (1) N.P. = Northview Park Page 11. 0439e �� b.) Lateral Benefit from Trunk Parcel Front Description Footage LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-11 906.39 Block 2, Lots 1-19 1455 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 Northview Park 2107.16 NN 1/4, SECTION 23 -- 2107.16 Assessable No. Total Credit Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment -- 906.39 $11.88 $ 10,768 -- 1455 11.88 17,285 -- 147.87 11.88 1,757 -- 2107.16 11.88 25,033 Parcel 014-26 547 -- 547 $11.88 Total 5163.42 c.) Lateral (6" Lateral on Clinton 'Trail S Savannah Road) Parcel Description LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, 2, 3 C. SERVICES Parcel No. of Description Services LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION B ock , Lots - 11 Res.(1) Block 2, Lots 1-19 19 Res.(1) Block 3, Lots 1-3 3 Res.(1) NORTHVIEW PARK Sanitary Sewer 1 - 6" Water Main 2 - 4" NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 6 Res.(1) Parcel 014-26 1 - 6" Total (1) Residential Service = 4" Sewer and 1" Water. Page 12. 0439e �� Lump Sum $ 6,550 Cost/Service $ 722 4,593 $ 998 2,796 $ 6,498 $ 61,341 Total Assessment $ 6,550 Total Assessment $ 10,979 18,964 2,994 $ 722 9,186 $ 5,989 2,796 $ 51,630 Page 13. 0439e 67 D. STORM SEWER (Lateral) Parcel Front Total Description Footage Rate/FF Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, lots 1-19 906.39 $20.46 $ 18,542 Block 2, Lots 1-11 1,455 20.46 29,765 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 20.46 3,025 NORTHVIEW PARK 2-,107.16 20.46 43,108 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 20.46 11,190 Total 5,163.42 $105,630 • E. STREET a.) Northview Park Road Parcel Total Description Front Footage Rate/F.F. Assessment LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Block 1, Lots 1-19 906.39 $33.75 $ 30,591 Block 2, Lots 1-11 1455 33.75 49,106 Block 3, Lot 3 147.87 33.75 4,991 Northview Park 2107.16 $33.75 $ 71,117 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 014-26 547 $33.75 18,461 Total 5163.42 $174,266 ® b.) Clinton Trail and Savannah Road Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment Lexington Square 6th .Addition $15,900 $ 15,900 C.) Bituminous Trail Parcel Total Description Lump Sum Assessment Lexington Square 6th Addition $24,340 $ 24,340 Page 13. 0439e 67 Sanitary Parcel Sewer Description Lateral LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION Lot 1-11, Block 1 $ 1,672 Lot 1-19, Block 2 1,672 � Lot 1-3, Block 3 --- C NORTHVIEW PARK $ 1,672 Parcel 012-26, 013-52, 012-52, 020-54, Part of 014-26) NE 1/4, SECTION 23 Parcel 010-03 Parcel 010-04 SE 1/4., SECTION 23 Parcel 010-77 Parcel 010-78 NW 1/4, SECTION 23 Part of Parcel 014-26 $10.029 TOTALS $61,850 0439e SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL LEXINGTON SQUARE 6TH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 485 COST/LOT, PARCEL Storm Water Main Sewer Trunk Lateral Services Lateral Total Street Assessment $ 1,102 $ 998 $ 1,556 $ 3,786 $ 9,114 1,102 998 1,556 3,786 9,114 1,102 998 1,556 3,786 7,442 $44,506 $25,033 $ 9,908 $ 43,108 $ 71,117 $195,344 $ 7,140 7,140 $18,802 18,802 $ 6,498 $ 8,785 $96,390 $67,891 $51,630 Page .14. $ 7,140 7,140 $ 18,802 18,802 $ 11,192 $ 18,461 $ 54,965 $105,630 $214,506 $597,897 • • � g�J a o� M N MI avouH"Vnvs ---� I n1vU1 LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA eva 133HIS 38nln! BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDEkUK Se ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1988 Comm. 49405 l'I Fig. No. 1 avc 8^J J s a!u IMLL LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA m BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1886 Comm. 48405 Fig. No. 2 L E I.l z O r z_ X W J (NORTHUIEW PARK ROAD) TRUNK AREA WATER ASSESSMENT AREA PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERUK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers to Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1888 Comm. 49405 FFIg NO. 3 avoa Nvmlo\vs a z w W N a J Q W J '1Ivul ice= LLI � T 1: LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1986 Comm. 49405 Fig. No. 4 I 1 r A \ I I N \ 1 1 I II 1 + 1~ilo I M/U 133HL5 '3Uf11nd �p , N¢ ¢ 1 3 Y e 4 uw 6 V 01 OI W 1 i LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1986 Comm. 49405 Fig. No. 4 • • 81p W -o M©� aVatl H"W%VS 0 R 1Po81 i e � Ili � 7 I m rd LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA E BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1988 Comm. 49405 FICJ. NO. 5 ` � 3 W H Q `l p N W 41 �J LI MAI 1338, 3unln.4 a a =J Q Y, N _ l•1 � O W u � J LEXINGTON SQUARE SIXTH ADDITION (NORTHVIEW PARK ROAD) STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT No. 485 EAGAN, MINNESOTA E BONESTR00, ROSENE, ANDERLIK do ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineers & Architects St. Paul, Minnesota Date: OCT. 1988 Comm. 49405 FICJ. NO. 5 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, 'City Council Meeting Page Twenty -One ADOPTION 1987 GENERAL AND UTILITY FUND A. Proposed Adoption of 1987 General &Utility Fund Budget --Several special meetings of the City Council were held from August through November to discuss, review and determine the 1987 Operating Budget for both general fund activities and the utility funds. The total budget for general fund is $7,389,630. The property tax levy that was certified at the first meeting in October will reflect a small mill rate decrease for next year despite an increase in the operating budget.. With the increased assessed valuation, the City is able to increase its budget, meet its local service delivery needs and lower the mill rate by a small adjustment. The total utility budget or enterprise fund for 1987 is $3,142,540 which includes water, sewer and residential street lights. There is no property tax required for the public enterprise funds. All workshop sessions to determine the 1987 budget were special City Council meetings open to the public. There was a public hearing held on September 16 at a regular City Council meeting to present the proposed General Fund budget. There was also discussion regarding the proposed General Fund budget at the October 7 regular City Council meeting at the time the mill levy was certified for collection in 1987. The operating budget was covered by local reporters and discussed as a topic on the Eagan Report as apart of our local access for Group W cable. • Enclosed are copies of summary sheets for the 1987 General and Utility Fund Budget found on pages through 7.,- Once the budget is officially adopted by the City Council, all data including a narrative will be prepared and distributed for City •Council and Departmental use. A copy is always available for public inspection at the library and City Hall facilities. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the 1987 General and Utility Fund Budget as presented. iA, GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUE Description General Property Taxes Licences ® Permits Intergovernmental Revenue Charges for Services Recreation Charges Fines & Forfeits Miscellaneous Revenues Refunds & Reimbursements Transfers TOTAL GENERAL FUND • Actual Actual Budget Budget 1984 ------------ 1985 ------------ 1986 =----------- 1987 ------------ $ 2,542,723 $ 2,738,983 $ 3,161,450 $ 3,988,600 55,386 66,169 59,030 68,140 435,469 914,181 677,850 783,120 904,463 1,045,325 1,194,800 1,312,670 209,096 471,380 496,380 '434,400 38,222 47,760 39,230 56,750 78,008 92,560 90,000 95,000 58,375 145,247 50,660 73,900 388,295 526,303 430,600 479,050 0 0 0 98,000 $ 4,710,037 $ 6,047,908 $ 6,200,000 $ 7,389,630 ---------------=------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ----------- �7 GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Actual Actual 1984 1985 GENERAL GOVERNMENT 01 Mayor & Council 02 Administration 03 Data Processing 05 Finance/Clerk/Elections 06 Legal 08 Planning & Zoning 09 General Gov't Buildings 10 Cable TV PUBLIC SAFETY. 11 Police 12 Fire 13 Protective Inspections 15 Civil Defense 16 Ambulance Service PUBLIC WORKS 21 Public Works Engineering 22 Streets & Highways PARKS & RECREATION 31 Parks & Recreation 32 Tree Conservation OTHER 41 Contingency $ . 43,590 199,512 0 344,978 101,971 93,925 80,848 0 $ 864,824 $ 1.,579,156' 266,539 208,657 7,248 28,373 ------------ $ 2,089,973 $ 319,777 534,027 ------------ $ 853,804 $ 475,062 27,274 --- $ 502,336 ----------- 0 $---------o $ 35,176 340,710 0 393,172 129,628 111,700 94,405 0 $ 1,104,791 $ 1,687,070 318,059 276,692 10,066 33,088 $ 2,324,975 $ 324,098 701,015 ------------ $ 1,0259113 ------------ $ 654,589 40,287 ------------ $ 694,876 ----------- 0 $---------o Budget 1986 ------------ $ 35,460 258,120 0 456,350 130,000 174,870 89,020 68,550 $ 1,212,370 $ 1,948,980 351,770 410,300 7,060 37,920 $ 2,756,030 $ 403,120 930,370 $ 19333,490 $ 761,710 53,450 ------------ $ 815,160 $ 82,950 $ 82,950 TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES $ 4,310,937 $ 5,149,755 $ 6,200,000 6$ Budget 1987 $ 48,280 321,050 135,040 429,370 175,000 212,490 139,200 98,150 $-1,558,580- • $ 2,128,850 518,130 451,540 7,690 0 $ 3,106,210 $ 386,010 1,186,100 ------------ $ 1,572,110_®' $ 963,710 74,600 ------------ $ 1,038,310 $ 114,420 ------------ $ 114,420 $ 7,3899630 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES TOTAL OPERATING $2,243,190 $2,902,886 $2,639,630 $2,3239048 $3,264.100 REVENUES ------------------------ 6 ACTUAL, ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED 1984 1985 1986 9/30/86 1,987 OPERATING REVENUES: 61 WATER Service Charges $1,603,927 $1,259,675 $1,100,000 $ 995,270 $1,400,000 Connection Permits 69590 11,525 8,000 9,860 8,000 Penalties 9,260, 13,166 11,000 9,511 14,000 Sale of Materials and Meter Charges 52,201 100,335 64,000 89,445 92,000 • Other 37,240 8,491 4,1550 12,901 9,700 TOTAL $1,109,218 $1,393,192 $1,187,550 $1,116,987 $1,523,700 62 SEWER Service Charges $1,383,318 $1,447,547 $1,400,000$1,152,182 $1,650,000 Connection Permits 90822 11,630 8,000 9,880 8,000 Penalties 13,803 19,749 14,000 12,704 16,500 Other 1,764 2,185 580 1,315 700 TOTAL $19408,707 $1,481,111 $1,422,580 $1,176,081 $1,675,200 • 63 STREET LIGHTING Service Charges $18,345 $28,583 $29,500 $29j980 $65,200 TOTAL $15,600 $28,583 $29,500 $29,980 $65,200 TOTAL OPERATING $2,243,190 $2,902,886 $2,639,630 $2,3239048 $3,264.100 REVENUES ------------------------ 6 ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED 1984 1985 1986 9/30/86 1987 NON-OPERATING REVENUES: $447,254 $1,137,438 $313,500 $720,270 $420,000 Special Assessments Interest $3,041 $2,215 $1,000 $6,704 $7,300 Interest on Investments 392,031 572,513 300,000 --- 450,000 Interest on Current Value and Debt Service Credit 35,249 33,139 30,,000 --- 299000 Sale at City Property 3,945 1,600 --- --- Connection Charges 447,254 1,137,438 313,500 720,270 420,000 Connection Charge Water Treatment Plant --- 370,260 124,800 249,336 140,400 • TOTAL NON-OPERATING 441,594 259,465 100,000 --- 250,000 REVENUES $8819520 $2,1179165 $769,300 $976,310 $1,046,700 GRAND TOTAL REVENUES $3,417,790 ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- $5,020,051 $3,408,930 $392999358 $4,310,800 DEDICATED REVENUES - NOT AVAILABLE FOR OPERATIONS Connection Charges $447,254 $1,137,438 $313,500 $720,270 $420,000 Water Treatment Plant Debt Service Surcharge 184,271 278,528 197,170 248,077 250,000 Connection Charges --- 370,260 124,800 249,336 140,400 Water System Renewal and Replacement 95,481 122,792 1.20,480 103,994 115,570 Sewer System Renewal and Replacement 88092 93,630 76,440 69,579 85,910 Interest Earnings: Water Treatment Plant D.S. 441,594 259,465 100,000 --- 250,000 Water System Renewal and Replacement 61,408 66,683 50,770 --- 70,000 Sewer System Renewal and Replacement 68,426 73,098 57,460 --- 75,000 Municipal Center Expansion 128,000 100,000 --- 79,400 $1,386,826 $2,529,894 $1,040,620 $1,391,256 $1,486,280 ------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------- 79 PUBLIC UTILITIES COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENSES • Total Excluding Depreciation Expense $622,280 $1,180,440 $1,286,400 $810,869 $1,333,510 Depreciation Expense 272,575 331,625 310,000 --- 360,000 Total Including ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED Depreciation Expense 1984 1985 1986 9-30-86 1987 61 WATER Personal Services $163,026 $203,043 $226,100 $165,314 $275,450 Supplies, Repairs, and Maintenance 47,997 70,257 68,780 47,100 73,510 Other Services and 117,030 108,971 137,490 83,600 129,490 Charges 411,257 907,140 991,520 598,455 984,550 • Total Excluding Depreciation Expense $622,280 $1,180,440 $1,286,400 $810,869 $1,333,510 Depreciation Expense 272,575 331,625 310,000 --- 360,000 Total Including Depreciation Expense $894,855 $1„5129065 $1,596,400 $8109869 $1,693,510 62 SEWER Personal Services $20,210 $35,832 $66,120 $41,586 $82,790 Supplies, Repairs, and Maintenance 79338 9,827 13,150 109696 14,240 ®Other Services and Charges 117,030 108,971 137,490 83,600 129,490 Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Charges 892,107 972,670 1,191,120 787,173 1,168,230 Total Excluding Depreciation Expease,$1,036,685 $1,127,300 $1,408,080 $923,055 $19394,750 Depreciation Expense 223,791 322,204 275,000 --- 350,000 Total Including Depreciation Expense $1,260,471 $1p449,504 $1,6839080 $923,055 $1,744,750 63 STREET LIGHTING Other Services and Charges Total Excluding Depreciation Expense Depreciation Expense ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET YTD ESTIMATED 1984 1985 1986 9-30-86 1987 $22,473 $28,347 $29,500 $24,261 $53,500 $22,473 $28,347 $29,500 $24,261 $53,500 Total Including Depreciation Expense $22,473 $28,347 $29,500 $24,261 $53,500 • Total Operating Expenses Excluding Depreciation Expense $1,681,438 $2,336087 $2,723,980 $1,758,185 $2,781,760 Total Depreciation Expense 496,369 653,829 585,000 — 7109000 Total Operating Expenses Including Depreciation Expense $29177,807 $2,989,916 $3,308,980 $19758,185 $3,491,760 NON-OPERATING EXPENSES Interest Expense on MWCC $12,844 $10,504 $11,000 $5,882 $11,000 Total Operating and = Non -Operating Expenses Including Depreciation $2,190,651 $3,000,420 $3,3199980 $1,764,067 $3,502,760 7v Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Two Memo City Council Meeting WAIVER OF PLAT/DUPLEX LOT SPLIT IN RAHN RIDGE A. Waiver of Plat (B.H. Grace,) to Split a Duplex on Lot 3, Block 4, Rahn Ridge, Located East of Nicols Road Abutting Vienna Lane --An application was submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting a waiver of plat for Lot 3, Block 4, in the Rahn Ridge Addition. For additional information regarding, the waiver, refer to page. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the application as presented for a waiver of plat by B. H. Grace Corporation. • • 73 • CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT APPLICANT: B. H. GRACE CORPORATION LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DATE OF REPORT: REPORTED BY: LOT 3, BLOCK 4, RAHN RIDGE ADDITION R-2, WITHIN MISSION HILLS P.D. (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) (77-1) DECEMBER 16, 1986 DECEMBER 8, 1986 PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by the B. H. Grace Corporation requesting a Waiver of Plat for Lot 3, Block 4 in the Rahn Ridge Addition. All 25 duplex lots meet or exceed-Ehe 15,000 sq. ft. per lot and the 100' width. This duplex [leets Code. setback requirements and has separate utilities _serviced by Vienna Lane. If approved, this Waiver of Plat shall be subject to all applicable Code Requirements. RAHN RIDGE •./..Y. s` •Ii �y'��' r�� .. X11 11• .1..q• RAHN ID ITF I~ � :: ,: � LIQ � .. _ - j ..•`` c„ << �, •a ..: �';.:. :,'� <9t I •�0 .'F !(.{ <% �� ` .• •• tit• JR• .� hi: tv.'• yC. Iza 1 ..-r' 0`:x.1 �. -tv �i.- .J ,...- � 7:—. �j. _ .. - 1 [ l VIENNA •' r =ANE Ir I �i li l: VIS:,\w• - -._. ..11•.•:;1 .. �r�...` • 1:�1 .�.•:, � Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Three Memo City Council Meeting 1987 LIQUOR LICENSE/EAGANDALE CLUB B. 1987 Liquor License for Eagandale Club --According to the City Clerk's office, the Eagandale Club is delinquent in property tax payments to the County. According Chapter 5, Section 5.04, of the Eagan City Code, "No license under this Chapter shall be granted for operation on any premises upon which taxes, assess- ments, or installments thereof, or other financial claims of the City, are owed by the applicant and are delinquent and unpaid. For the purpose of this section, "applicant" includes persons and related persons...". It was therefore the opinion of the City Clerk and City Administrator that the on -sale liquor license for the Eagandale Club should not be renewed in 1987 unless property taxes were paid in full. The Eaganaale Club was placed on notice of this proposed action and contact was made by the Eagandale Club's legal counsel regarding the issue. Mr. Richard Nadler of Richard Nadler and Associates, legal counsel for the Eagandale Club, is suggesting that due to bankruptcy proceedings and the court's desire to keep the Eagandale Club operational, the requirement to pay property tax is stayed by the nature of the proceedings. Please refer to a letter and notice of the bankruptcy case which is enclosed on pages 7/„ through %% . Under the circumstances, it may be in the best interest of the City, recognizing the bankruptcy proceedings, that the Eagandale Club be allowed to continued operating as a full-service club with the on -sale liquor license. The City Attorney is reviewing the mat -ter and will provide additional comment at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the ®Eagandale Club a liquor license in 1987 recognizing that a section of the City Code has been violated by non-payment of property tax,; however, further recognizing that the club is experiencing a bankruptcy proceeding at the present time. E Richard G. Nadler & Associates Attorneys At Law December 4, 198'6 Tom Hedges, City Manager City of Eagan 3838 Piolot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: Eagandale Indoor Tennis Partnership Chapter 11 Case No. 3-86-2609 Dear Mr. Hedges: Please be advised that I represent the above-named who filed a Chapter 11 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court, St. Paul, Minnesota on September 29, 1966. My client advises me that since .the filing of that petition it has been advised by you that the liquor license in the premises would not be renewed as a result of back taxes due to the state of Minnesota. The refusal to renew my client's liquor license as a result of unpaid real estate, sales or withholding taxes due to the state, city or county which are prepetition taxes, violates Section 362 and Section 525 of/the Bankruptcy Code. In a recent case In re Blarney, Inc., 53 B.R. 162 (Bkrtcy. 1985) the Honorable Margaret A. Mahoney, United States Bankruptcy Court Judge, District of Minnesota granted an injunction against the City of St. Paul from refusing to renew the liquor license of a restaurant and bar for similar reasons. A copy of that decision is enclosed. Please review this and advise me within the next five days that the City Council is going to renew the liquor license baspd upon this federal law. Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation on this. Zincere Richard N,adler RGN:mlb cc: Paul Hauge, City Attorney Graham Gurr ,..... _ �„�l,lin�• �� r,,i;,,• 4trret� St. Paul R9in,;,,_:.,i.� ::6�n, � :r.,,, ��: U. S. BANKRUPTCY COURT( NOTICE OF CHAPTER 11 BAIrfQ2UPTCY CASE, DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA MEETING OF CREDITORS, AUTCMATIC,STAY 627 U.S. Courthouse TIME FINED TO FILE CIAIMS, BRC. 316 No. Robert Street Bankruptcy Case NtRmber: BKY 3-86-2609 St. Paul, MN 55101 In re: EAGANDALE IP:DOOR TENNIS PARTNERS (a limited Iv---tnership) d/b/a The Eagandale Club Debtor: Federal Tax I.D.No. Fed. I.U. No. 41-1300013, MN I.D. Ivo. 5238806 NOTICE is hereby given to the debtor, creditors, and other parties in interest, that: - 1. PETITION: ATTORNEY An order for relief urder 11 U.S.C. Chap 11 has been entered on a petition filed on Seotenber 29, 1986 by the debtor named above, of 3330 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan., MN 55121. The attorney for the debtor is Pichard G. Nadler, 510 Degree of Honor BuildirG , St. Paul, MN 55101. L. AUTCMATIC STAY As a result of th_ e filing of the petition ccmnencirg this case, certain acts and proceedings against the debtor, property of the deb*.or and property 01 - the estate are stave as provided in 11 U.S.C. Sec. 362(a). 3. STATUS OF DEBTOR Debtor is the debtor in possession and thereby has certain rigrits, powers and cuties of a trustee under 11 U.S.C. §1201 and 1107.Debtor has the exclusive. right for 120 days to file a plan, unless a trustee is appointed, but if 6ebtor does not file a. pian within that time, and the court does not extend such tire. then any party in interest may file a plan, under U.S.C. §1121. 4. PROOFS OF CLAIM To vote or, a plan or receive distribution under a plan, a creditor must file a proof of claim with the clerk of this court on an official form prescribed for a proof of claim. Subject to Local Rule 124, the date a plan is ccnfisred or the 90th day after the date below set for the meeting of creditors, whichever occurss later, has been fixed as the last day to timely file.a proof of claim in this case. Proofs of claim received after such date will be filed as claims tardily filed without purer to vote under 11 U.S.C. §1126 and without distribution under 11 U.S.C. §1142 and 1143 except as provided by law. Certain claire, listed in the schedules filed by or for the debtor for amcunts stated as not disputed, contingent or unliquidated, are deemed filed as proofs of claim under 11 U.S.C. §1111. However, to avoid uncertainty or misinformation, every creditor should promptly file its own proof of claim, which then supersedes the scheduled claim if any. P_ claim form is provided on reverse side of this notice. 5. M=TING OF CREDITOR: AGENDA On November 24, 1986, at 1:00 P.M., in 535 U.S Ecirtltcluse, 110 South Fcurtl: Street, Mirmeapg is, i•uq 55401, a meeting of creditors will be held pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §341(a). The debtor shall appear by its president or other executive officer, if the debtor is a corporation, or by a ' general partner, if the debtor is a partnership, at that time amu', place, for the States purpose of being examined. Attendance at this reeting by creditors or other parties in interest is welcome but not required. The United States Trustee, or his desicnee, John A. Hedback, Attornev, shall preside at the meeting. Creditors may examine the debtor and transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting, which may be continued or adjourned from time, to time by notice, at the meeting without further written notice to cre6itors. 6. PROOFS OF INTEREST If the debtor is a. corporation or limritcd partnership, a proof of interest may but need not be filed by any shareholder or other equity security holder of the debtor under 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1111 and applicable rules. A proof of claim form should not be used for this puiluse. DATED: October 22, 1986 TD'011iY R. ;TSBRIDGE, Clerk PROOF OP CZAR+, FORM 01' REVERSE S771,E United States Bankruptcy Ccurt SCL RULE A PAGES SLH DULE B PAGES (i''L i L! V L U , .v i 19b 11IC-T206 s. .77 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Four PRELIMINARY PLAT/NORTHWEST AEROSPACE TRAINING CORPORATION LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION C. Preliminary Plat (Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation) for Lone Oak 2nd Addition Consisting of a Flight Simulator Training Facility --A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their November 25, 1986, meeting to consider a preliminary plat consisting of approximately 82 acres and entitled Lone Oak 2nd Addition. It was noted at the APC meeting that Northwest Airlines had already received grading permits and foundation permits from the City Council to start construction of the training facility. It was also noted that the footprint of the building is approximately 103,600 square feet. After • further review, the APC recommended approval of the preliminary plat to the City Council. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning ann?dd�� Engineering Departments' report found on pages through —�' The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at its December 4 Commission meeting is recommending a cash dedication according to the City's commercial and industrial cash dedication require- ment. For additional information on this item, refer to the APC minutes; a copy is enclosedon pages -FZ-through 41�. A request was presented to the City by M.A. Mortenson Company, asking that the City allow erection of the steel superstructure ® prior to final plat approval. Please refer to the attached letter found on pages�_through _q� It has been City policy that no permits beyodd foundatidn permits be granted without final plat approval. The one exception was the United Parcel Service building. The City staff has concerns about granting any building permits prior to final plat approval recognizing that the incentive to complete the development agreement and all final plat application material is lost once the developer begins construction. If the superstructure is allowed, it must be contingent upon no further construction being allowed until the final plat is approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) Approve or deny the preliminary plat entitled Lone Oak 2nd Addition and 2) approve or deny the erection of the steel superstructure prior to issuance of a final plat. (l CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION) APPLICANT: NORTHWEST AIRLINES LOCATION: OUTLOT "M" LONE OAK ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: P.D. (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1986 REPORTED. BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING ® APPLICATION: An applibation has been submitted by Northwest Airlines requesting a Preliminary Plat for the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. This plat, on Outlot M of the 1st Addition, consists of 1 lot and 2 outlots, totaling 82.3 acres. Lot 1 will be the 103,668 Sq. ft. Northwest Aerospace Training Facility. The Lone Oak P.D. was approved in March 1984. Outlot M was designated for Northwest Airlines' future development, therefore, the use is consistent with the P.D. exhibit.. COMMENTS: The site plan for this project was reviewed in detail prior to the issuance of a .grading permit in October 1986. All Code requirements had been satisfied. At that time, the entire. 82.3 acre parcel was to be platted into a single lot. Since then, the applicant has chosen to plat only the area needed for the Aerospace building and leave the remaining area as outlots. Outlot A, 15.15 acres, .will basically provide access from the Owest. Outlot B, 26.74 acres, abuts O'Neill Drive to the north and. will be capable of accommodating another significant building. The Aerospace Facility -and parking setbacks still meet Code require- ments as the site plan itself has not been. changed. 341 parking stalls will be provided in, 2 separate lots. 553 parking spaces would be necessary in strict office 'designated areas. Since this Aerospace building is a' 24 hour facility and for a specific user group, the parking appears sufficient. Parking and building expansion areas have been provided, both meeting Code requirements. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The required site grading for Lot 1, Block 1, of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The first phase has already begun under the authority of Grading Permit #EX 01-216, issued by Council action on October 7,' 1986. Because the second phase involves encroachment into Eagan Pond FP -4 (DNR Wetland #250W), a DNR permit will be required before this second phase can be initiated. Generally, all drainage generated from this facility will be directed :into this large wetland, with the exception of the extreme southeast corner, which will be directed into a newly created LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 j PAGE TWO ponding area. Pond FP -4 is presently receiving runoff from Ponds FP -5 and 11, with no downstream outlet currently available. Figure 1 shows the relationship of this property to the existing and proposed future storm water system requirements. The outlet for Pond FP -4 will be southwesterly to Pond FP -7, which has a positive outlet down to the Minnesota River. Extensive erosion control measures will have to be established to minimize the impact into these City and DNR protected wetlands as well as adjacent private property. The grading plan previously submitted and approved shows no slope steeper than 3:1 and no encroachment on private property. However, the proposed grading plan does encroach into the required storm water storage capacity as identified on the City's Comprehensive Master Plan. Either this Master Plan or the proposed grading plan will have to be revised to provide the required storage volume for storm water runoff in this portion of District "F". UTILITIES: Neither sanitary sewer nor water main facilities are immediately available to allow the development of this facility. An internal lateral sanitary sewer presently exists within the boundaries of Lot 11 Block 1, of this proposed development. However, this sanitary sewer does not connect to downstream facilities and was constructed prematurely as a part of the lst Addition grading and development schedule. Therefore, it will be necessary to extend this existing sanitary sewer lateral southwesterly to the future Lone Oak Drive thence westerly to the existing trunk facility adjacent to T.H. 55/149 intersection. In addition, an B" sanitary lateral will have to be constructed to the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, to provide future service for unplatted parcel 010-29, located south of O'Neill Drive and north of the existing Northwest Airlines Corporate Headquarters. Figure 2 shows the relationship of the existing and required trunk sanitary sewer facilities. The completion of the trunk water main system, in accordance with the City's Master Plan for this area, eventually requires the looped connection from Lone Oak Road up to O'Neill Drive through this. proposed development. Figure 3 shows the relationship and proposed trunk water main necessary to service the ultimate development in this section of the City. As a result of a detailed analysis evaluating elevations and required fire flows, the northerly portion of the 12" water main will have to be installed along O'Neill Drive to this development with an 8" connection to the existing loop around the N.W. Airline Corporate Headquarters to the west. The completion of this 12" trunk water main loop to Lone Oak Road will not be necessary until that property develops. The alignment of this southwesterly extension to Lone Oak Road is dependent upon a conceptual layout of the future development south of this proposed Lone Oak -.2nd Addition. OA LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE In order to provide sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer facilities to allow the development of this proposal, it will require the developer's financial commitment or authorization by Council action for the installation of these trunk facilities through adjacent property. Internal lateral utilities, whether installed privately or under a City contract, must be in conformance with City approved engineering standards and specifications. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Access to Lot 1, Block 1, will be obtained through the construction of an internal private street constructed to City standards from O'Neill Drive along the northwesterly edge of the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. A secondary access to the Northwest Airlines Corporate Headquarter parking lot will be provided to the west. However, the final street configuration is dependent upon the approval of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) due to the fill required within or adjacent to DNR Protected Wetland #250W. • With O'Neill Drive being the only primary access to this facility, it will be necessary to complete the upgrading of this street. Presently, the easterly access to Delaware Avenue in Mendota Heights and the westerly access to T.H. 149 have been completed as a part of the upgrading of I-494. The completion of the middle section of O'Neill Drive to City standards should be ordered by Council action prior to final plat approval. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY/PERMITS: Due.to the requirements of extending trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and improving O'Neill Drive to City standards impacting properties adjacent to and beyond this development to provide service to this proposed facility, it will be necessary to ensure that -all permanent and temporary construction easements will be made available prior to construction initiation. Therefore, it will be necessary to have ® this development responsible for the acquisition of all required easements or a financial escrow to cover all anticipated costs associated with acquisition through adverse condemnation. It will be necessary to acquire all Department of Natural Resources (DNR) permits prior to final plat approval. The acquisitipn of the required Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Metropolitan Waste Water Control Commission (MWCC) and Department of Health sewer and water extension permits will be required prior to the issuance of a utility construction permit. An MPCA Indirect Source Permit will also be required prior to final plat approval. Ponding easements of sufficient configuration shall be dedicated as required by City staff to incorporate the necessary storm water storage volumes for Ponds FP -4, 41 and 11 and shall be shown on the final plat. All internal public utilities shall have permanent utility easements dedicated of sufficient width depending upon the final alignment and depth. J LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE FOUR ASSESSMENTS: Trunk area sanitary sewer has been previously assessed over all portions proposed to be included in the Lone Oak 2nd Addition. No further assessments are associated with trunk area sanitary sewer. Trunk area storm sewer was assessed over that portion lying within the west half of Section 1 (Outlot A). Lot 1, Block 1, and Outlot B have not yet been assessed for trunk area storm sewer -improvements. With the required trunk area storm sewer facilities necessary to service this deveelopment, it will be required to have this development agree to those trunk area assessments through the Development Contract. In addition, trunk area water, assessments have not yet been levied due to the lack of trunk water main facilities in this general area. As a condition of final plat approval, it will be necessary to have this development agree to these related trunk area water O assessments. A portion of O'Neill Drive has already been upgraded to City standards near the northeast corner of this proposed subdivision. All assessments associated with this improvement performed by MnDOT and the future improvement of O'Neill Drive required with this final plat shall. be the responsibility of the developer for its respresentative frontage. All trunk area assessment obligations shall be in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval and provide credit for the required dedicated ponding easements. These assessment obligations are estimated with 1986 rates as follows: Final quantities will be calculated based on final plat dimensions. Project Item Quantity Rate Amount Code # Trunk Area Storm Sewer 43.0 Ac. $ 0.075/sf $140,481.00 302 Trunk Area Water 58.14 Ac. $ 3,020/ac $175,583.00 O'Neill Dr. 1070 LF $ 78.45/lf $ 83,950.00 Final quantities will be calculated based on final plat dimensions. -LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION PAGE FIVE CONDITIONS: LONE OAR 2ND ADDITION 1. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and the upgrading of O'Neill Drive to City standards shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The acquisition of an MPCA Indirect Source Permit shall be required prior to final plat approval. 3. Ponding easements incorporating the required storm water capacity shall be dedicated with the final plat. 4. This development shall be responsible for providing the necessary easements for the construction of O'Neill Drive and the required sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer facilities prior to final plat approval. If they cannot be provided, the developer shall be financially responsibile for all costs associated with the City's acquisition of both permanent and temporary construction easements for these public improvements. 5. The developer shall obtain all required DNR permits prior to final plat approval. 6. All internal utility and drainage easements necessary to incorporate public improvements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 7. All public improvements constructed within this development, whether performed privately or under City contract, shall be in conformance with City approved engineering standards. 8. The development shall be financially responsible for its proportionate share of the assessments associated with the development of this property. 9. The grading plan or the Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan shall be revised to accommodate_ the proposed surface water runoff associated with this development prior to final plat approval. 10. All existing drainage and utility easements required to be vacated shall be approved prior to the release of the plat for recording at the County. 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submision. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. % A.EkE'YY I_AQ Ik ...... A. Pa O. '471 v 3M k�. L AHD,,DEVEL NORTHWE Pease 9, a I RES 1 3wll 2N�rT U zt:; WA• CDTA'WAE 'E HETAfL/ TE GENMAA� NTiAL I EVELOPME FFICE FF1C& IRESEARCK ---------- Laukka -Beck Phapot i3:1 "AETA1000F CEi t Site Concept Plan C OFFICE 0 OM TOTAL SITE AREA A92.0 A % 4: - crk-,-) NORTHWEST AIRLINES -4 .. "I SHOWROOM —- - — — 1511A A DEV p 4 A �RESEARCII& -DEVELOPMENT,- TOTAL PUBLIC ROADWAYS 29,2 A PUBLIC ROADWAYS NORTHWEST AIRLINES 3.1 A Pnae OFFIrE/SHOWR8OMPH4SE5 PUUUC ROADWAYS LAUKKA-BECK 26.2 A P. 'RESEARCH & "ADEVELOPMENT— "OFFICE/RETAM, k —I IN', NN...:1._WAA ...'RESEARCH & -------- 21,1 c—P, 00 EVEL PMENT RESEARCH ULVLL 4 Pm.. 3 ow OFFICE E. OFFICE/ % SHOWROOM'..�a - i M 9.WH�PPE."R.'9.4ei""ir'r•mo :RESEARCH P. ENT, 0 FIC E/SHOWROOIA RESEARCH III DEVEII,OPMENT1. j 411 Ail Ph... 5 .......... .. LmmP OA A I �' iIt � __ a I: ; J ; `\♦`` Il �! � 1 \ O 11 'ti'\I, iii ```I `: �`. � �' ! � -'- �.' I S - pi�' •' i-�-- `� i��a fii I I �qn\\` 1 \. .C�`\fl• /1\♦\�-^. \. ! �`\ I ; �' , / � .' i : •�� l j I 'Iii -- ` f y 1 '1d' �' S t VIE ' • "�� / /�I�\.\ \ �� / ; ! r I I ! i I 1 I I P� �� B / %/gyp-- I ' `-------^ -\ \I ` ` \ \\\ �-.. � h/l'l ; \ ``It '/III O' 6 i \ I 1 I I I . / �• / p // � � I / �- �' � �/i,u�J� 11111-\� . !-- - � f • 11\-'/ /ill) 11 ' 1 i I j II SII '1 ;�1-�11 .11 1' //i, �/ �`:;�__r_ u i NOf rHWE3i AEh"ACE TRAWWU COFQ+OnAT10N �"uuu�=ii.i%1.• �• y.l + II '/ NWA IM.• Wodd H,,dpuam . i.y , Mmnewl. SS121 I I'll q p/ ' I \j `�a\` ` 'I -•♦♦ I �' iIt � __ a I: ; J ; `\♦`` Il �! � 1 \ O 11 'ti'\I, iii ```I `: �`. � �' ! � -'- �.' I S - pi�' •' i-�-- `� i��a fii I I �qn\\` 1 \. .C�`\fl• /1\♦\�-^. \. ! �`\ I ; �' , / � .' i : •�� l j I 'Iii -- ` f y 1 '1d' �' S t VIE ' • "�� / /�I�\.\ \ �� / ; ! r I I ! i I 1 I I P� �� B / %/gyp-- I ' `-------^ -\ \I ` ` \ \\\ �-.. � h/l'l ; \ ``It '/III O' 6 i \ I 1 I I I . / �• / p // � � I / �- �' � �/i,u�J� 11111-\� . !-- - � f • 11\-'/ /ill) 11 ' 1 i I j II SII '1 ;�1-�11 .11 1' //i, �/ �`:;�__r_ u i NOf rHWE3i AEh"ACE TRAWWU COFQ+OnAT10N �"uuu�=ii.i%1.• �• y.l + II '/ NWA IM.• Wodd H,,dpuam . i.y , Mmnewl. SS121 III I(f i it ii71 "' ••_•� •--••-• --. I1W1\R10d1JO�ONIMVy1 T7tlJSClf]M 147/A111110N �� ,j/,�-\ I ' 1, "1I � `. `::.`":,•_,-,, '.;\ Y Alil��iff Ili F 0 1' il�j ' i ' � _-_`�`;��\yyy..�i��1o�.`�✓ill ,j/,�-\ I ' 1, "1I � `. `::.`":,•_,-,, '.;\ • �- 111 ,1 •° a .SCC °f/,�tC ! 3 f"'., A �' t' a@e •i1lllll J e: i c4 - OMELL'S DRIVE "�+OlgO M' i0y Dot � . = ns•r •Mrons �^•• 7UBDNB 01D-20 M2 71 w.a C R �pNE OUTLOT M � 1.. cunffr A oUROT 0 O �NK mnmc mM•-• /--� 010-02• _ 43 oLMLOT M V ovnm D � r,wro•en .owr .r ... -. 1 X '.aov�u i.. r�ortOi //AAr�� oVRO " YOUTLOT 1 • IXlRQf O i - OVRDT E •'�_ • . ` 10' pt3F- olws OM L \ ounnry 12, , - olo-n o1o•aa 8 r _ ovnoY-� ` � � ; - oeo-Oe Donor x ' ; l • , 020-U .UTO ! 610 000- 5 00-00 -65 ON AK ROAD a (COUNTY ROAD Na 28) i O,1 - - EAaM MMES A ,wrur.u•..0 ...... ra. 1 EXISTING�-- PROPOSED • TRUNK SANITARY SEWER �orre Owl 2�'� Fm SUBJECT PARCEL FP -9 'FP -13 aSTO 891.2 890.0 LONE OAK 2nd :ADD. FIG. City of eagan approved: standard PUBLIC STORM SEWER plate WORKS DEPARTMENI MASTER PLAN II I f � 1 11 I L J y• .'� II'I:! I:I I- 30 a �. - «yI181\�I79 1J�::j:_(V K ($�NO21 \'_l.-. '� \ �'IX211 1 Wjp. _ _ p0{�I11 LONE_ K ROA TEMPORARY - — „_AUIITOR j N -DD --- 15 _ 80 2ki 12 \c �p \,u.s POSTAL tLM��WCC `uII�gam' SERVICE 85 I �\ ,f BURtjVIE iV rn RbR OA ; BZ ! PARK' JN � ��' \� 7LLN C N- Q j �NqA EI-- I I\ r I I I I z" �NrEq 1511 E \ o - I. IAiLL'F5' >cE l I N- T 193 \ - N -V rco 12" I �® I Q, ' N-JJ1 I nHER EAG4 I I i6pA iI N -EE ' 1211 ,,,M\R hYE ZI r1 5 ✓ / � �'\\� 'I I I . li - �� )) 4001TION WESCOTT I \. LONE OAK 2nd A[)D. SUBJECT PAROL FIG. #2 city Of e --Agan gan SANITA SEWER approved:- plate #tl PUBLIC WORKS MAST PLAN! DEPARTMENI� I i .GAN SUBJECT PARCEL LONE OAK 2nd ADD. FiG.s City Of eagan approved: standard PUBLIC. WATERED II WORKS MASTER PLAN DEPARTMENT 4 APC Minutes November 25, 1986 LONE OAK 2ND ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT At 10:45 p.m., Chairperson McCrea convened the second hearing of the evening regarding Outlot M of: Lone Oak Addition. City Planner Runkle introduced the project and Mr. Jim Thorn, Vice 'President of Properties of Northwest Airlines, in regard to the request for preliminary plat for Lone Oak 2nd Addition, consisting of one lot and two outlots on Outlot M of Lone Oak 1st Addition. Mr. Thorn addressed questions in regard to the facilities and the 16 full -flight simulator bays costing $14 million each. Trygg moved, Mulrooney seconded the motion to recommend approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The installation of trunk sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer facilities and the upgrading of O'Neil Drive to City standards shall be ordered for installation by Council action prior to final plat approval. 2. The acquisition of an MPCA Indirect Source Permit shall be required prior to final plat approval. 3. Ponding easements incorporating the required storm water capacity shall be dedicated with the final plat. 4. This development shall be responsible for providing the necessary easements for the construction of O'Neil Drive and the required sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer facilities prior to final plat approval. If they cannot be provided, the developer shall be financially responsible for all costs associated with the City's acquisition of both permanent and temporary construction easements for these public improvements. 5. The developer shall obtain all required DNR permits prior to final plat approval. 6. All internal utility and drainage easements necessary to incorporate public improvements shall be dedicated on the final plat. 7. All public improvements constructed within this development, whether performed privately or under City contract, shall be in conformance with City approved engineering standards. 8. The development shall be financially responsible for its proportionate share of the assessments associated with the development of this property. 9. The grading plan or the Comprehensive Master Storm Sewer Plan shall be revised to accommodate the proposed surface water runoff associated with this development prior to final plat approval. 10. All existing drainage and utility easements required to be vacated shall be approved prior to the release of the plat for recording at the County. go APC Minutes November 25, 1986 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submission. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. All voted in favor except Harrison who abstained. PINECREST ADDITION -'PRELIMINARY PLAT 6 REZONING The hearing on the application of Huttner Construction for rezoning and preliminary plat of Pinecrest Addition was then convened. The rezoning request was to allow 7 agricultural acres to be rezoned R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat located south of Crestridge Lane, abutting Fish Lake Park. City Planner Runkle introduced the application and indicated that there was some disagreement as to the best alternative to a long cul-de-sac for this proposal. Issues raised at a, neighborhood meeting included the quality of storm water into Fish Lake, the length of the cul-de-sac, and the number of lots. Mr. Huttner was present and indicated that the homes to be built would be in the $120,000.00 to $160,000.00 range. Mr. Dale Nathan of 1308 Kolstad Lane appeared and stated he was in favor of the project without the alternative street hook-up to Kolstad Lane. Mr. Ed Kolstad of 1320 Kolstad Lane also expressed his being in favor of the project without the extension to Kolstad Lane. Discussion then centered around the alternatives to a long cul-de-sac and the need for park access to the peninsula south of the property. Mr. Colbert indicated that an easement for the park would be a condition of the plat. All lots exceeded 12,,000 square feet and the cul-de-sac would be 650 feet in length. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the request for rezoning and preliminary plat with a variance for the cul-de- sac. The stub street would not be required. The approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right-of-way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30 foot half right-of- way and this vacated right-of-way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right-of-way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. IM, 11 General Contractors Construction Managers M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY 700 Meadow Lane North PO. Box 710 December 11, 1986 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440 612/522-2100 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation Building Permit Progress Dear Sir: As you may be aware, M.A. Mortenson Company is the general contractor for the new Northwest Aerospace Training Corporation (NATCO) project currently under construction at 2600 Lone Oak Point in Eagan. At this time, we have received a grading permit and a foundation permit from the City of Eagan for this project. We have attempted to make application for the Building Permit itself but have been told this is not permissable until the Final Plat for Lone Oak 2nd Addition has been approved. Under the very best circumstances February 1, 1987 is the earliest approximate date this could occur. Due to favorable weather and a timely delivery of fabricated materials we are coming .along well with the project and are meeting and exceeding our construction schedule. To date, approximately 1,800 tons of structural steel has been manufactured and partially fabricated for the NATCO building. We have begun receiving daily truck loads of structural steel which we are stockpiling on site. We would like to begin the erection of this steel approximately January 5, 1987. ®he purpose of this letter is to formally request from the City of Eagan, permission to begin the erection of the steel superstructure per the above schedule. In our conversations with Eagan building officials it has been recommended that we request this of the Eagan City Council since it is a departure from the typical permit process in your city. We would like to respectfully suggest options for your consideration which we have discussed with your building department staff: 1. Permission to work, including the erection of structural steel, under the present grading and foundation permits. The final Building Permit would be applied for immediately following Final Plat approval. 2. Issuance of another partial permit which would cover superstructure and enclosure work only. Again, the Building Permit would be applied for at the time of Final Plat approval. 3. Issuance of the actual Building Permit with the stipulation that it be revoked if approval of the Final Plat is not obtained for any reason. All permit costs and fees would be payable with the issuance of this permit. 9z Minnesota • R0cheste5 Mr. Thomas Hedges December 11, 1986 Page Two We ask the City Council to review this request at the regularly scheduled council meeting December 16. The Pre -Plat approval for Lone Oak 2nd Addition will also be reviewed at this time. Representatives from Northwest Airlines and M.A. Mortenson Company will be in attendance to answer any questions the council may have in respect to this request. We appreciate your consideration of this matter and we look forward to building another fine addition to your community. Yours truly, Mark Westin Project Manager MW/ce 11 cc: City of Eagan Building Inspections Department City of Eagan Planning Department Jim Thorne - Northwest Airlines, Inc. Bob. Ritchie - Northwest Airlines, Inc. Mark Hanson - Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlick & Associates • 9V Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Five PRELIMINARY PLAT/PINECREST ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat for Pinecrest Addition Consisting of 17 Single -Family Lots and a Rezoning from A to R-1 for Seven Acres and a variance for a Cul -de -Sac in Excess of 50.0 Feet --A public hearing was held by the APC on November 25, 198;6, to consider a preliminary plat consisting of approximately seven acres, containing 17 single-family lots and a rezoning from A to R-1 in addition to a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. The APC discussed the overall development of the property and how road connections could be made to the east and west, noted that all lots are in conformance with the R-1 requirements and further discussed storm water run-off and the length of the cul-de-sac. It is the recommendation of the APC that the preliminary plat • be approved consisting of 16 lots with the access road stubbed to the west and also that the park trail be worked out with the Parks Commission for our City Council meeting. For additional information on this item, refer to the Planning and Engineering Department report foundon pages424 through //a For a copy of the recommendation by the Advisory Parks and Recrea- tion Commission, refer to page /// . For a copy of the APC minutes, refer to pages //Z -through _0_Z. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the rezoning and preliminary plat as presented by Huttner Construction for the Pinecrest Addition and to approve or deny the variance • for a cul-de-sac in excess of 500 feet. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT- Rezoning APPLICANT: Preliminary Plat (Pinecrest Addition) Huttner Construction LOCATION: SW ;, Section 15' EXISTING ZONING: A (Ag.) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: November 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: November 17, 1986 REPORTED BY: Planning and Engineering • APPLICATION: Two separate applications have been submitted by Huttner Construction requesting a rezoning of 7 agricultural acres to an R-1 (single family) district and a Preliminary Plat for the Pinecrest Addition. This plat consists of 17 lots anti is located south of Crestridge Lane, abutting Fish Lake Park on the south property line. The Comprehensive Guide Plan des- ignates this area as R-1, therefore an Amendment will not be necessary. LANDUSE/SITE PLAN: This 350' wide parcel is surrounded by ag. parcels to the east and west. this City's Park Department owns property south of this parcel, some or al'l of which may be under water. The master plan for this park calls for a trail connection from the recently completed 'built' portion of the park to the peninsula on the north side of the lake. Either an easement or land dedication will be necessary for this connection. Fish Lake has a General .Development designation under the City's Shoreland Ordinance. This will require that the homes on lots 7, 8 and 9 be a minimum of 50' from the Ordinary High Water Eleva- tion (OHWE). The submitted grading; plan places the building pads at least 85' in lineal distance and approximately 25' above that elevation. All lots 'conform to Code requirements- in terms of size, frontage and square.footage. The original submission was for 17 lots served by a single 650' cul-de-sac. Other options .have been discussed including one with a stub street to' the west and one with a connection to Kolstad Lane.. The gross density for the 16 lot proposal would be 2.3 units/acre and 2.4 units/acre for the 17 lot proposal. The site has packets of dense vegetation including mature hardwood species and a large area of scotch pines near the center of the site. The topography contains knolls and depressions and falls dramatically towards the lake. The proposed cul-de-sac 'will be nearly 30' above the 'normal lake elevation. The applicant will be. -the site builder for this subdivision and the homes will be.in the $140,000 range. � fo PInECREST ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE TWO GRADING/DRAINAGE: Presently, approximately the northern one-third of this parcel drains north towards Crestridge Lane with the southern two-thirds draining south into Fish Lake. This proposed development will be performing extensive grading on this site resulting in cuts of approximately 10-12' through the middle portion of this parcel, resulting in the majority of the drainage being directed by an internal storm sewer system into Fish Lake. Fish Lake is presently controlled at an elevation of 844.8 by means of an existing storm sewer system down to the Minnesota River. Due to the sensitivity and qaulity of this lake, extensive erosion control measures will have to be implemented during the development phases. UTILITIES: A 15" trunk sanitary sewer line of sufficient depth and capacity is immediately available across the southern portion of this unplatted parcel. The internal sewer lateral system will connect directly into this trunk facility. A water main of sufficient capacity and pressure is immediately available within Crestridge Lane. This proposed development will obtain service by extending an internal 6" water lateral and provide a stub for future extension to the west for future looping if, and when, the adjacent unplatted parcels develop in a similar manner. STREET CONFIGURATION/CIRCULATION: The initial application for the development of this parcel provided for only a singular cul-de-sac taking access from Crestridge Lane approximately 650' in length, exceeding the 500' maximium required by code. As a part of the overall development of these several remaining unplatted parcels between Crestridge Lane and Fish Lake, it has been determined that a stub street should be constructed from this proposed cul-de-sac to the west boundaries of this plat for future extensions. The center line of this stub street should be approximately 400' south of the center line at Crestridge Lane. Figure 1 shows the recommended master plan for the future development of these unplatted parcels. Figure 2 shows an alternate configuration that was reviewed by staff. However, it would require the replatting of the existing Buffer Hills cul-de-sac (adjacent to Pilot Knob Road) and would require the dedication and construction of a public street and right-of-way through the adjacent easterly parcel to Kolstad Road. Subsequently, the developer has revised his proposed preliminary plat to conform to the recommendations consistent with Figure 1. A condition should be placed to ensure that no direct driveway access is taken from a stub street to the west to minimize winter snow and ice control maintenance requirements. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Presently, there is a 40-42' half right- of-way for Crestridge Lane as dedicated with the previous Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition. Crestridge Lane is presently constructed to its ultimate design standards, which requires only a maximum 30' half right-of-way. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that as a condition of this plat all excess right-of-way beyond a 30' half right-of-i.ay be vacated and included as developable property with this plat. 97 PINECREST ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE ;L: Staff concurs with the proposed 60' public right-of-way dedication for the internal street servicing this proposed development. All other internal drainage „and utility easements shall be dedicated as required by the final alignment and depth of any internal utility systems constructed outside of dedicated right-of-way. ASSESSMENTS: Both Outlot A of Pilot Knob Heights 1st Addition and the unplatted parcel 070-51 have been previously assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and water benefits. Therefore, there are no additional assessment obligations associated with these trunk area utilities. However, the trunk area storm sewer assessment levied under Project #77 in 1972 did not cover the entire area of both parcels. • Subsequently, there are five acres proposed to be platted under this application that have not fulfilled their trunk area storm. sewer obligation. In addition, when the trunk area sanitary sewer was installed across the southern boundary of this parcel, the lateral benefit was deferred until time of development and/or connection. Subsequently, this development will be responsible for 350' of lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer. A detailed research of the assessmentrecords also revealed that there ire $1,542.86 of outstanding levied special assessments that have never been collected due to Outlot A going tax forfeit. This outstanding amount, plus any interest due, should be the responsibility of this development. • While the outstanding additional assessment obligations associated with this plat will be calculated at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval, the financial obligation has been estimated for informational purposes only using the 1986 rates as follows: Item Quantity Trunk Area Storm Sewer 218,642.6/sf Lateral Benefit from Trunk Sanitary Sewer 350/lf Outstanding Balance from Tax Forfeit (Outlot A) Proj. Rate Amount Code $ 0.05/sf $10,932.13 279 $28.69/lf 10,041.50 58 $ 1,542.86 P:INECREST ADDITION NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE FOUR CONDITIONS: PINECREST PRELIMINARY PLAT 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right-of-way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30' half right-of-way and this vacated right-of-way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right-of-way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. 4. This development shall submit and adhere to a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City standards and special requirements for this development. 5. No driveway accesses shall be taken from the stub street to the west. 6. This development shall be responsible for all outstanding assessment obligations at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 7. All public street and utility improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with City engineering standards. 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul-de-sac on the single access proposal shall be. granted. 10. 'The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for their recommendations.of the parks dedication and or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning ordinances. • LOCATION EXISTING ZONING COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN JIL JAI t7l L �-�L�-j NEB —LB —0—, R R41 clsc 'ITY R- AALL 11 R-1 �� 04 r? I R-19 A v a s gel z 11%,/%ll(1(two �• o 1 I l mw) v rnc um�n.. r.. LA ra PN - PINECREST ADDITION 'UTILITY PLAN :NUTTNER CONSTRUCTION.INC._ a s z �• o m <. m r O v m m z H >' ._ .... _ m a O O z I _ O O z ,a 0 r r Z rnc um�n.. r.. LA ra PN - PINECREST ADDITION 'UTILITY PLAN :NUTTNER CONSTRUCTION.INC._ - fl IT t 12. • uu.ue ro.�YO: mrlaevu0u _' f I. . I reorouo JOYIY.: r CO o IS ° AM1A: 1,0 AT K' AT i' • .. I AS Irt,OAO.I,V W ' • 3. a 1fi e ° AG - - TOTAL LOT.: „ - /L LV . - a 1.1101:1 LO, eL0[ 09.810 1 -1 - - .. AS I`fl e ...LL m Lar urn IT.... •,r. • 0 I9 4 _]4 t ¢;AT • ILL LOTS 1..000 ..1. YI•. Q AS J.0 ... LOTS n' Y LL L„YL 091.0. 409 } k I PLAT INFORMATION O �_ fi • 13. J 0 ° J W6 i F.- y n1.I e 09009 Ouurrno. r..... • ore -n .o.nrl .a wlyw _ 0 c L•• =�Vmvlx r0=Q � - fl t 12. • uu.ue ro.�YO: mrlaevu0u _' f . reorouo JOYIY.: r CO o AM1A: 1,0 AT • .. I Irt,OAO.I,V W ' Z e ° { - - TOTAL LOT.: „ - /L LV . - a 1.1101:1 LO, eL0[ 09.810 1 -1 - - .. e ...LL m Lar urn IT.... •,r. 0 ¢;AT • ILL LOTS 1..000 ..1. YI•. Q J.0 LOTS n' Y LL L„YL 091.0. 409 ° • J J W6 L•• ••o•.. AITT e• 1:J T e C;aw zw FISH LAKE PARK - v 1 _ _ z S¢W .. . •- .°L01,low Al.. :� =N �W R: HL.L AD CRESk RIDGE LANE I• — u BLOCK 1 i is F �fl e' Rew • I 2 15. ^ IT I 13 , K• IT CRESTRIDGE WAY t 12. I IV U � i fi c tw7 a 1t LI B. .FISH LAKE PARK T un.no. AS PLAT INFORMATION L...L ...o. ono.:.....' ma -n ,mu................ I• "Z4 L.I.TIx.. exmo: .O.ICULT W AL IN l...0..xlxo: ... non u.6: 10 . ew m: a ual.u. x!1 .nl.: ]Y e.x a rr: ..r 19.19.19. rer.L. ler.: . LA..ur Ler •I.0 ...... ..r. .u.LL..r LOT tSu 19.2.6 S.F. ALL Ler........... -'-- ALL .uL LOT@ .6 x1\u Tx. muu LINK 0 e • -_ FISH LAKE ;P ARK. 1.�uu uev]noe, i DRAINAGE, DEVELOPMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN uyM�Ufd /i�l f D /. � V •. _ SII .1. city of eagan PUBLIC . WORKS nERARTME �e'r KNOB RD. / GE CT. G I L�� n W F N IZ 0 r Lu U H H H KOLSTAD I? l �beNMAKK AVE.. PINECREST -ADDITION • /D 6 . approved: standard plate #: FIG. 1 city of eagan M31-2 . WORKS F /DGE Cl: I N jJ,L1H1�1 1 � tGOLrSTAC RD. l _� I bEJJMAIZK Ms. 1 PINECREST ADDITION /07 2 4 J Ld 2 BL F- N V Cj approved: standard plate #: FIG.2 x city of e?gan PUB -1c WORKS SUBJECT PARCEL PINECREST ADD. STORM SWER FIG. *1 approved: standard plate #: n -yy . AY p� JOr. / s% ,f - i`T BIW U.5 POSTAL I IZI ` - B $ SERVICE w." - 4 f � f AI Y j / 1 NF— C� I �I \ � I 12 --I �laba� ,/ I tt T MINA I I'I i j BZ / < - `1 _ �FFRESS-- I' //^ - N 5 WRK 7. � 1511 ulDM)ADDITION �� `ice N -o 1!ol�lro� sa s9 301 / Fi k FOX 'I---� / N -E / C u _ RIODE' AFI - N-., • /// /// - /I/II N - V LLII 26 ' .�^ ! '�r 1U�1 / W h� SJ EI Ff fY1JL 111 G O r,. �� ¢ 1 LLIC G iT f PNO-� •.'�l `-- • '31 I. p9 ADDITION D eye 4 J PLOT KNOB �I�ti�,l {_i S 12 r ae�. I' �K rew00D LCENTER , RAILS PaIILJf 1�N.1`11 <'L7,1 L ,, e� 11ADDON \A KR! /.W'�1�F\IDCCI i-Ilff„VV1'1et,"_ _ C -DrB�5130 acrcH.3fiIN AgRE` J WILLS CITY C-II%iaYti�'sM"��— Ck(} jell 111 aLACNHAwII \ .. ��`�� C- f I 1 ( - I— -k" ^I _ PAHN ` 1 h JI F © o � 1 L�R � a �;1 1a'1 s f� T ty *�j-y�.�I �1 O K VDASE AOy rr� 61 1 daJ\-I j 3311 _� z NO. c -Pp' j >n J w j] 117 Sxowl71, I rP ��tliu,�' n;� h I' 15 12 l �y1 � ' 33 0 l I� r1ILANDALE'------- ��u� 7� AfRICn PINECREST ADD. ............... ................ ............... ................ SUBJECT PARCEL FIG. #2 city of eagan SANITARY SEWER approved:- platePUELI#d WORK /Q F, WORKS MASTER PLAN city of eagan WATER PUBLIC $ woes MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN TO FIG. *3 approved: standard plate #: '.M .Y: ,z city of eagan WATER PUBLIC $ woes MASTER PLAN DEPARTMEN TO FIG. *3 approved: standard plate #: MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR I/ FROM: CEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATIONj� DATE: DECEMBER 10, 1986 RE: ADVISORY PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ACTION - PINECREST ADDITION At the regular meeting of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission on • December 4, the Commission reviewed the proposed rezoning and preliminary plat for the Pinecrest Addition. The Advisory Commission has made the following recommendations: 1. That a cash dedication requirement pay for the seventeen (17) lots created with this plat. 2. That a trail easement be provided through proposed lots 119, 1110, at an elevation above the high water elevation and at least 10 ft. in width. 3. That said trailway through these lots, extending to and connecting park property, be benched in by the developer. KV/bls cc: Julie Dykstra, Planning Aide Dale Runkle, City Planner Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works LJ APC Minutes November 25, 1986 11. All standard plat conditions shall be adhered to. 12. This plat shall be subject to the parks dedication fee. 13. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on an approved grading plan prior to the final plat submission. A financial guarantee shall also be submitted and not released until after a full year from the time of installation. All voted in favor except Harrison who abstained. PINECREST ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT b REZONING The hearing on the application of Huttner Construction for rezoning and • preliminary plat of Pinecrest Addition was then convened. The rezoning request was to allow 7 agricultural acres to be rezoned R-1 Single Family and a preliminary plat located south of Crestridge Lane, abutting Fish Lake Park. City Planner Runkle introduced the application and indicated that there was some disagreement as to the best alternative to a long cul-de-sac for this proposal. Issues raised at a neighborhood meeting included the quality of storm water into Fish Lake, the length of the cul-de-sac, and the number of lots. Mr. Huttner was present and indicated that the homes to be built would be in the $120,000.00 to $160,000.00 range. Mr. Dale Nathan of 1308 Kolstad Lane appeared and stated he was in favor of the project without the alternative street hook-up to Kolstad Lane. Mr. Ed Kolstad of 1320 Kolstad Lane also expressed his being in favor of the project without the extension to Kolstad Lane. Discussion then centered around the alternatives to a long cul-de-sac and the need for park access to the peninsula south of the property. Mr. Colbert indicated that an easement for the park would be a condition of the plat. All ® lots exceeded 12,000 square feet and the cul-de-sac would be 650 feet in length. Harrison moved, Wilkins seconded the motion to recommend approval of the request for rezoning and preliminary plat with a variance for the cul-de- sac. The stub street would not be required. The approval was subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right-of-way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30 foot half right-of- way and this vacated right-of-way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right-of-way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. APC Minutes November 25, 1986 4. This development shall submit and adhere to a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City standards and special requirements for this development. 5. No driveway accesses shall be taken from the stub street to the west. 6. This development shall be responsible for all outstanding assessment obligations at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 7. All public street and utility improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with City engineering standards. 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul—de—sac on the single access proposal shall be granted. 10. The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for their recommendations of the parks dedication and/or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning ordinances. Harrison and Wilkins voted in favor; McCrea, Trygg, Hall, Voracek and Mulrooney voted no. Mulrooney then moved, Voracek seconded the motion to recommend approval of the rezoning and preliminary plat, with a stub street to the west, subject to the following conditions: 1. The property owner and developer shall petition for the vacation of excess public right—of—way for Crestridge Lane beyond a 30 foot half right—of— way and this vacated right—of—way shall be incorporated into the proposed plat. is 2. This development shall dedicate all necessary ponding easements for Fish Lake necessary to incorporate the 847.0 elevation. 3. This development shall dedicate all utility easements outside of public right—of—way as required by the alignment and depth of all proposed public utilities. 4. This development shall submit and adhere to a detailed erosion control plan in accordance with City standards and special requirements for this development. 5. No driveway accesses shall be taken from the stub street to the west. 6. This development shall be responsible for all outstanding assessment obligations at the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. 7. All public street and utility improvements shall be designed and installed in accordance with City engineering standards. • APC Minutes November 25, 1986 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul-de-sacon the single access proposal shall be granted. 10. The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for its recommendations of the parks dedication and/or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning, ordinances. f 12. That the developer take all necessary steps required by staff to control erosion into Fish Lake. Mulrooney, Voracek, Trygg and McCrea voted yes; Wilkins, Hall and Harrison voted no. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 8 - PRELIMINARY PLAT The final hearing was then convened by temporary Chairman Harrison based on the application of Opus Corporation for preliminary plat of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 8, resulting from a replat of seven existing lots or portions thereof into 4 lots with frontage on either Eagandale Industrial Road 'or the West Service Road, located north of Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E. Dale Runkle introduced the replat and Mr. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus, concurring with all staff requirements and indicating that it was a clean-up of a waiver of plat resulting from expansion of National Business Systems. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. An 8 inch water main shall be constructed on the north side of the West Service Road between Eagandale Boulevard and Center Court in accordance with City approved engineering standards. 2. A drainage easement necessary to incorporate 1.1 acre-feet of ponding in the northeast corner 'of.Lot 2, shall be dedicated with the final plat. The actual construction of this drainage basin will be deferred until the time of building ,permit application. 3. This development shall accept the financial responsibility associated with the ,additional 8 inch water main construction or waive their right to objection if installed under a City contract. 4. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 5. This plat shall be subject to a parka dedication fee. All voted yes. 13 u Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Six Memo City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER #8 E. Preliminary Plat for Eagandale Industrial Center #8--A public hearing was held by the APC at their last regular meeting held on November 25, 1986, to consider the replatting of Lots 13, 14, 16, 17 and part of 18, Block 5, into four newly created lots located in part of the SE 1/4 of Section 3. The new lots have been established to allow free standing buildings or add two existing lots for building expansion. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to the/ Planning and Engineering report, a copy is enclosed on pages 116 through For a copy of the action taken by the APC, refer to those minutes found on page(s) >z;5. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat to replat certain lots in Eagandale Industrial Center #'8. /15 r\ LJ CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY PLAT (EAGANDALE'CTR INDUSTRIAL PARK #8 APPLICANT: OPUS CORPORATION LOCATION: LOTS 12-18 BLOCKS EAGANDALE CTR INDUSTRIAL PARK #1 SE i SECTION 3 EXISTING ..ZONING: L.I. (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 25, 1986 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 17, 1986 REPORTED. BY: PLANNING & ENGINEERING APPLICATION: An application has been submitted by Opus Corporation requesting a replat of seven existing lots, or portions o4 into four lots with frontage on either Eagandale Industrial Road or West Service Road. This replat will become the Eagandale Center Industrial Park #8 and is located north of. Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E. COMMENTS: All four lots meet' City Code requirements. Lot 1 contains four acres with 347' of frontage along West Service Road. -American Fruit, and Produce, to thewest, will use this lot for future expansion. Lot 2, to the north, will remain 400' wide but increase in size from 8.0 acres to 9.99 acres with frontage on Eagandale Industrial• Road. New Holland is to the west and the Northwestern Warehouse is to the east. Both lots will be serviced by an existing rail spur along the western property line. Lot 3, 300' wide, contains 5.15.acres and has access from West Service Road. It also has rail service from the north along the east property line. Lot 4 is a product of a Waiver of Plat approved in June 1986. That Waiver created a larger lot to the north that now contains the nearly completed National Business Systems building. GRADING/DRAINAGE: The proposed replat of Lots 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, and part of 18 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park into four lots under the 8th Addition is presently divided into two major drainage districts within the overall Industrial Park. Lots 1, 3 and 4 generally drain to the south towards the West Service Road and into the recently constructed trunk storm sewer system which provides sufficient storm water capacity to carry developed surface water runoff into LeMay Lake, which has a positive outlet to the Minnesota River. The northern portion (Lot 2) lies within the northern half of the drainage basin of this Industrial Park and directs the surface water runoff towards the existing storm sewer system in Eagan Industrial Road. However, this existing storm sewer system does not hr.ve adequate capacity to handle any development of Lot 2. A EAGANDALE CTR IND PARK #8 NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE TWO Therefore, Lot 2 will have to restrict its future surface water runoff through an onsite detention pond to ensure that the rate of future surface water runoff leaving the site does not exceed its present undeveloped rate of 8 CFS. This will require the development of a 1.1 acre -ft. pond which is proposed to be located in�the northeast corner of Lot 2. Because this is a replat of existing platted parcels, no major grading is proposed. Therefore, all detailed grading and erosion control plans will have to be reviewed and evaluated with the individual building permit applications. UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer of sufficient size, depth and capacity to service this development is presently available within Eagan Industrial Road and the West Service Road. A 12" water main presently exists along the south side ofEagan Industrial Road. In addition, an 8" water main presently exists along the west side of the West Service Road adjacent to Lots 3 and 4. However, it does not continue west with an interconnection to the existing 12"' water main within Eagandale Boulevard. Subsequently, proposed Lot 1 does not have water service immediately available. After reviewing the required fire flow and development needs regarding water availability, it is recommended that an 8" water main be constructed along the north side of the West Service Road between Center'Court and Eagandale Boulevard providing service to Lot 1 and a looping of the overall water system through the Industrial Park. • A STREETS/CIRCULATION: All streets within the Eagandale Center Industrial Park are presently constructed to their ultimate design width. However, all the streeets within the Industrial Park have been recently evaluated and it has been determined that an additional structural overlay will be required in order to maintain • the required axle load capacity necessary for heavy industrial traffic use. Presently, this Industrial Park is serviced with only three major accesses: Eagandale Boulevard at T.H. 55 to the north. Corporate Center Drive at Pilot Knob Road to the west. Eagandale Boulevard at Lone Oak Road to the south. As the Industrial Park continues to grow, traffic control will become more of a concern. Eagandale Boulevard at Lone Oak Road is scheduled to have a traffic signal installed during 1988. At the present time, there is no schedule for any signalization of the remaining two intersections. EASEMENTS/RIGHTS-0F-WAY/PERMITS: All public right-of-way necessary to accommodate this proposed development has been previously dedicated with the underlying plat or acquired by MnDOT with the West Service Road connection to Eagandale Boulevard. The only 117 EAGANDALE CTR IND PARK #8 'NOVEMBER 25, 1986 PAGE THREE additional easements beyond those required over the common lot lines will be the ponding easement in the northeast corner of proposed Lot 2 to accommodate the future required onsite detention basin. Although this is a replat of an underlying existing subdivision, there were no previously dedicated common lot line easements that have to be vacated in consideration of this replat. With the exception of the water main construction required, there are no known regulatory agency permit requirements associated with this development. ASSESSMENTS: The underlying lots proposed to be replatted have previously been assessed for trunk area sanitary sewer and water under Projects #11 and 28, respectively. The underlying Eagandale Center Industrial Park was originally • platted prior to the implementation of the current City Master Storm Sewer Plan and related assessment policies. Subsequently, this property has not been assessed its trunk area storm sewer assessment. However, the overall Industrial Park has been responsible for 100% of the costs of all 'required storm sewer improvements irregardless of the size or area serviced. Therefore, this Industrial Park has been exempted from the trunk area storm sewer requirements, with the understanding that any and all required storm sewer facilities necessary to service this Park as it continues to develop will be' the full responsibility of the benefitted property, with no contribution required from the City's trunk storm sewer system. With the exception of the required 8" water main looping on the West Service Road from Center Court to Eagandale Boulevard and the proposed future overlay within the Industrial Park, there are no • anticipated future assessment obligations associated with this replatting. CONDITIONS: EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER NO. 8 1. An 8" water main shall be constructed on the north side of the West Service Road between Eagandale Boulevard and Center Court in accordance with City approved engineering standards. 2. A drainage easement necessary to incorporate 1.1 acre -ft. of ponding in the northeast corner of Lot 2 shall be dedicated with the final plat. The actual construction of this drainage basin will be deferred until the time of building permit application. 3. This development shall accept the financial responsibility associated with the additional 8" water main construction or waive their right to objection if installed under a City contract. 4. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. c 5. This plat shall be subject to a Parks Dedication Fee. w Koo2 UNPLATTEO- A ..aK :. " .z 15 94?K R;�11 2n 3 1 r 3 P� SCORR s o27 +,r33 34 35 36 ,iv1 F�4 99K VL 2 A 1 N� 2 3 4 rv3' ..E B.K.... raK 93rK 1 EAGANDALE BUSINESS McKEE 1 G CAMPUS EAGANDALE _ Si J OFFICE seeK ,v suK Q CENTER �� EGND CE141 cl 3 2 - ,. G — 7 _ _.� FIRST n�DlTl: 'A •NEW 0� L0T28LK1 HOLLAND Y1° �'°"0 21 DIVISION OF ''c,, 15 SPERRY " 17 ]mKUd oumEw RAND SEVEH k yK BUSWESS AD ITION LENTEN 90 AMERICAN `O FRUIT & PRODUCE G�P`�2,1��2Pv EXCEProN 2P OUTLOT 7 .4IK14 19 EX( uro 15_. ww OUTLOT6 2 A CAF J9n9t 16 ` imK 3 2 r. C ;'.PI 5 5 11 :.. ra K . _:a AC ewLOo 5 A ;SC e 99N l7 s>sK 4 i97- ec`-J urr�. ..aiq • 10 TL IZ3. svK ,y CNK" :uK-oUT[oT4—.. x' .a...c 115 rrK 12 19 6 9.pK gl m R 1 9 m u i es aelK _ 22 LEMAY UNPLATTED (a v LAKE UNPLATTED au K APARTMENTS .mo EXCEPTION • PRELIMINARY PLAT OF, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK N0. 8 ji 'I\�_, ��i-' � � � .I •. qac—._ „�.._ •I p99. KR6 I .E_i i I L_H ' wu q'. -..i 1 _. _�' IIS �! � s / �_ — = 6-�II�-� •'' �^-� ,� BOCK Ii.O % �'- -.i'�G Ixli !�\1�� rll ��l�. ii'' 1 ... \•��\�L` > i _ 7. \ lav,oa so Rx' _�' -t j• - / –• j 8 siau oro-- s � . e i li 'i I — - _ III _ • „ /a i "a�\a I I Lp'.1TIOM IW Olre ................ ................ ................ SUBJECT PARCEL EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER No. 8 FIG. #1 city of eagan STORM SEWER approved: plated PUBLIC y/ WORKS ,-.•--,�-„ q %I w EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER No.8 city of eagan PUrjLlC 104 SUBJECT PARCEL ............... SANITARY SEWER 71 `IAIST R PLAN 61 N -T AOO N1.< FIG. #2 approved:- standard I plate #: EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL CENTER No. 8 city of eagan PUBLIC $ � woP.s DEPARTME SUBJECT PARCEL WATER MASTER PLAN FIG. #3 approved: standard plate #: • APC Minutes November 25, 1986 8. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 9. A variance for the cul-de-sac on the single access proposal shall be granted. 10. The plat shall be reviewed by the Advisory Parks Commission for its recommendations of the parks dedication and/or trail easement. 11. The plat shall conform to all shoreland zoning ordinances. 12. That the developer take all necessary steps required by staff to control erosion into Fish Lake. Mulrooney, Voracek, Trygg and McCrea voted yes; Wilkins, Hall and Harrison voted no. EACANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 8 - PRELIMINARY PLAT The final hearing was then convened by temporary Chairman Harrison based on the application of Opus ,Corporation for preliminary plat of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 8, resulting from a replat of seven existing lots or portions thereof into 4 lots with frontage on either Eagandale Industrial Road 'or the West Service Road, located north of Lone Oak Road and west of I -35E. Dale Runkle introduced the replat and Mr. Bob Worthington appeared on behalf of Opus, concurring with all staff requirements and indicating that it was a clean-up of a waiver of plat resulting from expansion of National Business Systems. Harrison moved, Hall seconded the motion to recommend approval of the • preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. An 8 inch water main shall be constructed on the north side of the West Service Road between Eagandale Boulevard and:Center Court in accordance with City approved engineering standards. 2. A drainage easement necessary to incorporate 1.1 acre-feet of ponding in the northeast corner of Lot 2, shall be dedicated with the final plat. The actual construction of this drainage basin will be deferred until the time of building permit application. 3. This development shall accept the financial responsibility associated with the additional 8 inch water main construction or waive their right to objection if installed under a City contract. 4. All standard platting conditions shall be adhered to. 5. This plat shall be subject to a parks dedication fee. All voted yes. Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Twenty -Seven Memo City Council Meeting DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING F. Resolution for Fiscal Year 1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding Application --The City has received an application from the Dakota County HRA for housing rehabilita- tion funds that total $285,000 and would serve approximately 37 owner occupied households in the community development district. The project will provide low interest deferred loans for low and moderate income homeowners. Any form of owner occupied housing would, be eligible, including mobile homes. During the initial nine month period, each community, which includes Apple Valley, Burnsville and Eagan, can target funds to meet certain local ® objectives. The funding is set -aside with Apple Valley receiving 24%, Burnsville 44% and Fagan 32%. For a copy of project objectives and description, refer to pages through IZ� For a copy of the resolution approving the pplication of the City of Eagan for fiscal year 1987 Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Funding, refer to page. The Planning Department, under the coordination and direct staff time of Dale Runkle, has helped to prepare this information along with the cities of Burnsville, Apple Valley and the Dakota County HRA. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a resolu- tion adopting the Community Development Block Grant Funding Application/Program for 1987.' Attachment A Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Proposal Fiscal Year 1987 1 Households between these income ranges would be eligible for loans. 2 Households below these incomes would be eligible for deferred loans. MW /ZL City of Eagan 4. Documentation in Support of Federal Objectives a. Benefit to Low and Moderate Income Persons The housing rehabilitation program will only be available to those households in Eagan within 80% of the median income for the Twin Cities Metropolitan Statistical Area. (See income limits listed below..) The program funds are only available for persons in this low and moderate income bracket who maintain owner -occupied, single family dwellings. Program benefit to this income group is 100Y. INCOME LIMITS Family Size Loansl Deferred Loans2 1 $12,300 - $19,250 $12,300 2 14,050 - 22,000 14,050 3 15,800 - 24,750, 15,800 4 17,550 - 27,500 17,550 5 18,950 - 29,200 18,950 6 20,350 - 30,950 20,350 7 21,750 - 32,650 21,750 8+ 23,150 - 34,400 23,150 1 Households between these income ranges would be eligible for loans. 2 Households below these incomes would be eligible for deferred loans. MW /ZL Attachment A (con't) Dakota County Community Development Block Grant Proposal Fiscal Year 1987 City of Eagan 5. General Description of the Project a. Project Description The dp ign of the program will be a combination of loansl and deferred loans to owner -occupied, single-family homes. With a Community Development Block Grant of $285,000, thirty-seven (37) loans of $7,750 would be available for the district. Low-income households with incomes less than 50% of the Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) median income (see Attachment A, page 1) will be eligible for deferred loans. Moderate -income households with incomes between 50% and 80%. of the MSA median income who demonstrate adequate capacity to repay the loan, and give evidence of acceptable credit risk t will be eligible for 3% low-interest rate loans. The maximum loan amount for both deferred and low-interest loans for single-family homes will be $10,000 with a maximum term of ten (10) years. Rehabilitation loans and deferred loans may only be used to improve the property by increasing the structure's energy efficiency, or to remove health, safety, or other deficiencies and to bring the structure into compliance with the property rehabilitation standards used by the Housing and Redevelopment.Authority. These loans may also be used to modify or rehabilitate the housing unit .to make it accessible for a han- dicapped or disabled member of the household. The improvements financed by these loans must be completed within nine (9) months from the date of the issuance of the Proceed to Work Order. Rehabilitation loans and deferred loans may not be used to finance freestanding or built-in kitchen appliances, landscaping, or work begun or completed before the date of the Proceed to Work Order. 1 The maximum loan available would be $10,000 for rehabilitation. To secure the loan, a promissory note for the terms and conditions agreed to and a mortgage deed shall be signed by all parties listed on the title of the pro- perty to be improved. The mortgage shall be recorded with the County; copies of all recorded documents will be forwarded to the homeowner. 2 The maximum deferred loan available would be $10,000 for rehabilitation. If the property is sold, transferred, or no longer the principal residence of the applicant, all funds must be repaid. A repayment agreement stating these terms and conditions shall be signed by all parties to the title of the pro- perty to be improved. This agreement shall be recorded with the County; copies of all recorded documents will be forwarded to the applicant. -2- /L7 40 Attachment A (con't) MHFA Home Improvement Loans will be awarded to households, with incomes less than $27,000. The maximum loan amount will be $15,000 for fifteen (15) years with a variable interest rate of 3% - 9% depending on the households income. MHFA Rehabilitation Deferred Loans of up to $7,500 will be granted to households with incomes less than $7,000. B. Project Need ` The need for housing rehabilitation in Eagan has been moderate in the past. In Dakota County since 1976, 23 of the 773 (3%) of the total Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Loans and Community Development Block Grant loans in Dakota County have been awarded in the Eagan area. Of the 15 households on the Dakota County HRA's waiting list for Minnesota Housing Finance -Agency Loans 1 (7%) is a resident of Eagan. Of the 26 households on Dakota County HRA's waiting list for Community Development Rehab Funds 3 (12%) are residents of Eagan. The current waiting list of Eagan residents would seem to indicate a moderate demand for housing rehabilitation funds. C. Implementation The Dakota County HRA will act on behalf of the City of Eagan in admi- nistering these funds. The HRA will provide the following staff functions: 1. Program advertising and outreach. 2. Loan intake and processing. 3. Housing.inspectiohs, work write-ups, bidding, working with contrac- tors, and final inspections. 4. Program fund requisitions, record keeping and auditing. 5. On-going loan servicing and program income accounting. -3- l2� Attachment B Eagan # of Applicants: 11 v of Moderate Income: 3 i Refused: 1 # of Low Income: 4 ff on Waiting List: 3 i of Female'Head of Household: 3 e Served: 7 v of Elderly: I i of Small Family: 3 of Large Family: 3 Address Low or Moderate Income Walnut Lane Low Donald Avenue Low Amaryllis Lane Moderate Beryl Road Moderate Highway 55 Low Sigfrid Street Moderate_ Blue Gentian Road Low Cinnabar Drive Waiting List Cleome Lane Waiting List Cliff Road Waiting List /2l • City of Eagan Resolution No. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF THE CITY OF EAGAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1987 DAKOTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDING BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows: 1. The City Administrator is authorized to submit the attached application to Dakota County for a Community Development Block Grant in Fiscal Year 1987. 2. The application is approved by the City Council and the Mayor and City Administrator are authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Eagan. 3. That the Dakota County HRA be designated as the administrative entity to • carry out the program on behalf of the City. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan this. day of December, 1986. ATTEST: Bea Blomquist, Mayor • Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator x-36 Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Eight FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, LEXINGTON HILLS ADDITION G. Consider Final Plat Approval, Lexington Hills Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for the Lexington Hills Addition located east of Lexington Avenue and north of Diffley Road. Enclosed on page /,3Y is a copy of the proposed final plat and all conditions required of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on October 7, 1986. However, as a part of the County review of this plat, due to its frontage along County Road 43 (Lexington Avenue), they have required that the existing intersection of Lexington Way (old • Lexington Avenue) with new Lexington Avenue be removed. This would result in Lexington Way being a cul-de-sac street approxi- mately 1,100 feet long with access to Diffley Road only. The requirement to eliminate this existing intersection is necessary to maintain the County's spacing guidelines between connecting intersections onto county roads due to the location of the proposed new major entrance into this apartment complex. The other item of concern to the County relates to providing access to the unplatted parcel to the north of the Lexington Hills Addition (proposed Episcopal church). While the County does not have the jurisdiction to require the provision of major access to this existing unplatted property in the northeast corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road, they strongly recommend that a major access be combined with the development of the ® Lexington Hills Addition due to the restrictions of access that will be placed on any future development of this unplatted property south of Lexington Hills. With the intersection of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road having to be upgraded and signalized in the future, the construction of required medians for traffic channelization will result in restricted access to this parcel. All other conditions of the City's final plat application process have been satisfactorily complied with. This includes the dedica- tion of a cross easement for the internal driveway to insure access for all units to Lexington Avenue. However, it does not provide for any access or cross easement to the unplatted property to the north as recommended by the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the final plat application for the Lexington Hills Addition and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. 131 LEXINGTON HILLS FIRST ADDITION • • IN m -N- : a: JC i i' t r i � 9� •t . xaxrudfnYr.Yrinu4iu.r.ri I., .�.w.�•usx u. svnsn.lnw. n...Y.-+�r \ . .—..l[I�.gY M Yr.x • ..xxx Y YYx tYx 1 � i 1� i ^SIN�NQ !O ~_ _ OIFFLEI' RL`1J1 `— Irn ..r. r rY x ru .r ..r x r.• n .^r.r u G.ECEIVEDMV 2 ■UNV•YIMO ■t NVICO• SM[R ! •F t MEE" x 6 • •I II 1, it LEXINGTON HILLS FIRST ADDITION • • IN m -N- : a: JC i i' t r i � 9� •t . xaxrudfnYr.Yrinu4iu.r.ri I., .�.w.�•usx u. svnsn.lnw. n...Y.-+�r \ . .—..l[I�.gY M Yr.x • ..xxx Y YYx tYx 1 � i 1� i ^SIN�NQ !O ~_ _ OIFFLEI' RL`1J1 `— Irn ..r. r rY x ru .r ..r x r.• n .^r.r u G.ECEIVEDMV 2 ■UNV•YIMO ■t NVICO• SM[R ! •F t MEE" x • • Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Twenty -Nine FINAL PLAT APPROVAL, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION H. Consider Final Plat Approval, Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition --The staff has received an application for final plat approval for Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition, located in the northwest corner of Corporate Center Drive and Trapp Road. As the Council may recall, one of the conditions of the preliminary plat approval granted by Council action on December 3, 1985, was the elimination of the proposed public right-of-way for the Trapp Court cul-de-sac. Subsequently, at several past City Council meetings, the applicant has requested the Council's reconsideration of the requirement to eliminate this public cul-de-sac. At the November 18 meeting, the Council agreed to allow this cul-de-sac to be platted as public right-of-way subject to the property owners entering into an agreement providing for perpetual private snow and ice control maintenance of this cul-de-sac. The developer would not agree to the terms and conditions of this maintenance agreement as prepared by the City. Subsequently, the developer no longer wishes to request that this cul-de-sac be platted as a public right-of-way but remain as a private cul-de- sac in accordance with the Council's original condition of approval a year ago. Enclosed on page /39 is a copy configuration which does not show the cul-de-sac. However, staff has provide a cost easement for this to insure continuous access of the deemed necessary by the developer design and subsequent plat application of the proposed final plat the public right-of-way for requested the developer to proposed private cul-de-sac three platted lots that was during the original layout process. However, the developer has objected to the City's requirement for this cross easement. Enclosed on pages)35a-/36is a letter explaining their objections. In executing the development contract agreement prepared by the City, the developer has crossed out the condition of the cross easement requirement and wishes to have the Council consider the elimination of this requirement. All other requirements of the final plat application process have been satisfactorily complied with. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM- To approve/deny the final plat application for Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition and, if approved, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. X33 EXHIBIT "A„ SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD ADDITION s wrw lalw�...Y w wl.v. wr .w .•.r.s rw, . w—r w+w — r.�. yv111...lOw.w l.IrnrylO. O...l nq.w•�..1rw.rw� .wrY�r rr /. _.w•. R.r .r rY �rr.�w rr�lr .. r r�rwM r.q s.r I.N. w. r.+r r..rr�—..w+rwY tiAr wTrgr..lr ./w.M ' i¢Ai MRiM1fdrrr�r I r....�•� �: 1 ��.`•.�..w.� r ... �r r r w. ..•wI r_q_r w w_Ya • ��!� .� r�r.l. w.•rr /4 ...r r.wYw.r...YrI... r. �P.r r. rr—. w r� 3 ,r. LOT S •p4F.1 • y\ fr— •X ` ..�rw rr -J.r .._✓•.wrlr....r��. w..a ` . / • _^ '•• � Ir—.rrRrr.rr�•.4.Y rr �. r. err r.".r .. • • �: .` � �� K y� 4 y `r_..w�`r._Iww _r.wl..r+...r wr .+...q r'w.r.wr \' Cr ... . q� LOT 3 4•• i .. Zi I I. w /•�..'�I 1 LOT 3 liJ 1 rr. rr. r r r..... w n.r Y r w.. •. V. t:1. ••J•<... .� r w a...wr r Y.r ...r. r.Yf. r� ..1J.r�a. ww r. +r rr —rr Oy EXHIBIT "A„ SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS Suite 1440 8400 Normandale Lake Boulevard Bloomington, Minnesota 55437 Telephone: 612-921-2100 REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT OFFICE December 11, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges, City Manager City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company ("NML") - City of Eagan ("City"); Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition - Trapp Court Cul de. Sac Dear Tom: rthw stern mai �rfe I write to restate in writing NML's position as discussed with you during our telephone conversation. The City has required, as a condition of its approval of the Eagandale Office Park 3rd Addition Plat, that NML burden each of the three lots with easements in favor of the other two lots. The easements would establish the right of each lot to use the neighboring lots for cul de sac purposes. The City, over the past year, has refused to accept the dedication of the Trapp Court Cul de Sac because (i) it is the City's opinion the cul de sacs are too expensive to maintain in the winter, (ii) that all of the lots affected already have access to public right of way; and (iii) the City would prefer a through street connecting Trapp Road to Corporate Center Drive. Cul de sacs are designed to help control traffic flow and benefits far exceed the cost of removing the snow. The lots all have access to the public street, therefore, it is my under- standing the City feels the cul de sac is unnecessary. If this is true, why does the City want to burden itself with controlling a private street that is unnecessary. In 1932, the Minnesota Department of Transportation condemmed additional land along Interstate 494 which substantially reduced the depths of /35 THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY • Milwaukee n LJ Page Two December 11, 1986 the lots north and northwest of the then dedicated continuation of Trapp Road. These lots became undevelopable.as-a result of the taking, in order to midigate the damages as required by condemnation law, NML presented a development plan to the City showing the realignment of Trapp Road, Trapp Court Cul de Sac and Eagan Industrial Road (Corporate Center Drive). In October of 1983, the land in question was replatted from Eagandale Center Industrial Park to Eagandale Office Park. The extension of Trapp Road to the west was vacated and the realignment of Trapp Road and the new Corporate Center Drive were approved with the plat. Trapp Road was realigned' to its present location, rather the farther west, because of the substantial change in elevation which would have required the destruction of almost all of the trees in the area in order to obtain the proper slopes. The construction of the road further to the west would have been much more expensive and more expensive to maintain. Therefore, I do not understand why the City would prefer a street through the site. NML objects to creating the above described cross -easements, because (i) NML does not want to preclude its intended marketing approach with respect to the two non -Sperry lots (i.e., NML intends to offer a proposed buyer the choice of access to the cul de sac together with mai.ntenance obligations or no access to the cul de sac and hence no maintenance obligations); and (ii) NML does not want to go through the inconvenience of, nor burden the City with obtaining the City's permission to terminate the private cross -easements if termination is desired in the future (presumably, such permission would be necessary if the creation of the private cross -easements is a condition of the Development Agreement). • The City has not informed NML of any significant public interest that would be served by the creation of the private cross -easements. The only public interest thus far cited by the City is the City's desire to prevent future disputes between private land owners with respect to their private land, which disputes the land owners might mistakenly believe to be within the jurisdiction of the City. NML does not , consider the City's desire to prevent such disputes to be significant enough to warrant the above-described inconvenience to NML and the above-described interference with NML's ownership and marketing of its land. Very truly yours, THE NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY n� Thomas S. Davis Assistant Manager TSD/nph 13� cc: Elizabeth Goodman Pail Hauge Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty z-ADDITIONAL;� ITEMS9 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONTRACTS A. Public Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Change Order #2, Contract 8`6-1 for 1986.Parks Construction Project --Change order #2 in the amount of $7,763.93, which provides payment to the contractor for costs incurred for material and labor on items not included within Project 86-01, is in order for consideration. This work included the removal of blacktop,- subcutting of Blackhawk Road at the corner of Blue_ Cross Park • and Blackhawk Road and constructing, 165 linear feet of B618 curb with bituminous mats; transportation and installation of additional top soil at Blue Cross Park; additional subcutting work and storm water pipe installation at South Oaks Park and Meadowland Park. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change order #2 for improvement Contract 86-01 for Central Landscaping Inc., in the amount of $7,763.93 and authorize the Mayor to execute. this change order. Item 2. Contract 86-14, Approve Change Orders #1 and 2 ('Greensboro Addition) -- Change Order #1: This change order provides for additional payment to the contractor for extra work necessary to improve the subgrade within public right-of-way necessary to support the typical traffic loads within this subdivision. Existing soil conditions, groundwater elevation and frequent rainfall experienced during utility installation resulted in an unstable subgrade. The total cost of this upgrade correction results in an Add of $31,657.14. All costs associated with this change order will be assessed against the subdivision. Change Order #2: This change. order provides for the installation of four new sewer and water services installed within Highview Avenue to accommodate existing and potential future lot splits prior to the final surfacing of that street. The change order is added under the Greensboro Addition contract rather than the Highview Avenue contract due to the favorable bids received to do these utility service installations. All costs associated with these new services will be assessed against the benefitted property owners in accordance with their petitioned request. This change order results in an Add of $2,,400. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve change orders. #1 and 2 to Contract 86-14 (Greensboro Addition/Highview Avenue) and if approve, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. - - Agenda Information Memo December 16, 198'6, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -One PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTCONTRACTS B. Private Improvement Contracts: Item 1. Contract 8'5-J, Final Acceptance (Haeg Addition) --This project provided for the installation of sewer and water services to service the new lots created under the development of the Haeg Addition. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action regarding acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:To approve Contract 85-J (Haeg Addition) and accept the improvements for perpetual maintenance. Item 2. Contract 86-V, Final Acceptance (Sunset 6th Addition) --This contract provided for the installation of streets and utilities to service the ten lot subdivision of the Sunset 6th Addition. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and these improvements are found to be in order for favorable Council action for formal acceptance for perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Contract 86-v (Sunset 6th Addition) and accept the improvements for perpetual City maintenance. 134 • • Agenda Information December 16, 1986, Page Thirty -Two Memo City Council Meeting CONSIDERATION OF CITY CODE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 6.42 C. Consider Amendment to City Code, Chapter 6, Section 6.42 to Change Requirements for Licensing Building Contractors --Effective January 1, 1983, a license:, bond and insurance provision for all construction, alteration or repair of buildings was enacted as an ordinance. For the past four (4) calendar years, the City has required contractor licenses, copies of performance bonds and liability insurance for any builder or contractor that is performing any new construction or alteration and repair of existing buildings throughout the community. The Building Inspection Department has commented to this office that licensing contractors has become a labor intensive exercise for their staff. More • recently, the City Clerk's office has raised question regarding the validity of a performance bond and the necessity for requiring notice of insurability by contractors. City Councilmember Wachter recently addressed the issues at a City Council meeting, suggesting that the City review the performance bond and determine whether the City has any regulatory authority over a contractor if a building permit is granted and a contractor or a builder performs faulty construction work. A meeting was held on Thursday, December 11, with City Councilmember Wachter, Chief Building Official Peterson, Assistant Building Official Reid and the City Administrator to discuss contractor licensing and more specifically the need for performance bonds and notice of insurability. At the suggestion of Assistant Building Official Reid and a strong concurrence by City Councilmember Wachter, Chief Building Official Peterson and the City ® Administrator, it was determined that the contractor licensing should be abolished for the following reasons: 1. The performance -bond does not serve any purpose for either' the homeowner or the city if faulty workmanship should occur by a builder or contractor. 2. It was determined that the City may be increasing its liability exposure by requiring notice of insurability by each builder if there is aclaim made any time during the, construction of a building. 3. The final reason for abolishing the actual contractor licensing is the determination that our building inspectors have made that once a contractor license is granted, the City must issue building permits to this builder regardless of his performance unless contractor license is revoked by the City Council. If the contractor licensing is abolished', the Building Inspectors have the freedom of the Uniform Building Code to deny a contractor or builder a building permit if their performance was not acceptable for the construction or alteration of a dwelling unit or commercial building in the ccmmur. itv. Other communis`- -.;- - Agenda Information Memo December 16, 1986, City Council Meeting Page Thirty -Three by Assistant Building Official Reid and interestingly enough most of the growth communities such as Bloomington, Burnsville, Maple Grove, Eden Prairie and Apple Valley do not have contractor licenses for this reason. The city of Eden Prairie had contractor licensing but abolished this regulatory control for the afore- mentioned reasons. Our Building Inspectors have observed and been told by various property owners that some contractors bill the cost of their license fee, performance bond and insurance to each and every project they construct in a given calendar year. Obviously, the duplication of cost is not fair to the consumer, however, the City should not control or monitor this type of activity. One other topic discussed at the meeting on Thursday, was the • idea to hold a homebuyers seminar sponsored by the Building Inspection Department each spring. This seminar would be in addition to a meeting that the City staff are giving consideration to with realtors and contractors that will be held during the late winter months. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny considera- tion of amending Section 6.42 by abolishing the construction, alteration or repair of buildings license, bond and insurance provision of the City Code. NOTE: The Director of Finance/City Clerk suggested that if this section is amended, the City might print a statement on each permit application that "The City assumes no responsibility for the builder's insurability or performance." THOMAS LAKE HOUSING SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT • D. Thomas Lake Housing Associates Supplemental and Regulatory Agreement --The Tax Reform Act of 1986 has imposed certain require- ments on multi -family projects such as the Thomas Lak2 Pointe project which was granted Mult-Family Housing Revenue Bonds by the City of Eagan. According to Jack Safar, representing Dominium Group and owner of the Thomas Lake Pointe project, it is necessary that the project avail itself of certain transitional status concerning depreciation allowances. In order to qualify, the project through its ownership entity must subject itself to both 1) a limited rate of return and 2) rental charge limitations on all of the dwelling units of the project. Both of these provi- sions provide added protection to the renter and appear to be consistant with the City's concerns that the Multi -Family Housing Bonds and use of tax exempt rates be passed onto the renter. For a copy of the supplemental regulatory agreement and a letter from Dominium Group, refer to pages/�/ through 15'0 . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the supplemental regulatory agreement as presented. 'f Jl=iO 14P."',I,R 1,' "hi :!', di.!�:�50 -r17 'I'ir�SJ-'171'1 December 9, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3839 Pilot Knob Road P. 0. Box Box 2119 Eagan, MN 55121 RE: THOMAS LAKE HOUSING ASSOSCIATES • SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT EAGAN, MINNESOTA Dear Mr. Hedges: In accordance with our previous conversation, you will find enclosed two copies of a Supplemental Regulatory Agreement concerning the above captioned project. As we discussed, the Tax Reform Act of 1986 has imposed certain requirements on multi -family projects such as Thomas Lake Pointe, in order for such a project to avail itself of certain transition rule status concerning depreciation allowances. In order to qualify the project through its ownership entity must subject itself to both (1) a limited rate of return and, (2) rental charge limitations on all of the dwelling units in the project. Further, as you will note, the Agreement must remain in effect . until 1995 and the terms of this Agreement will not prevail if in conflict with any other previously executed agreement. I would greatly appreciate being placed on the City Council agenda on Tuesday, December 16th for anticipated adoption of this Supplemental Agreement. In the event you or 'a City Attorney have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Should you feel it necessary and/or expeditious you may have a City Attorney contact the attorney who developed this Agreement, Mr. Rick Goldstein with the Washington D. C. law firm of Lane and Edson (202/ 955-9600). Sincerely, DOMINIUM GROUP .INCORPORATED ck Wi War ce President JWS/sl SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT THIS SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATORY AGREEMENT (the "Supplemental Regulatory Agreement") is made and entered into as of _, 1986, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, a political subdivision organized and existing pursuant.to the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota (the "Issuer"), and THOMAS LAKE HOUSING ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a Minnesota limited partnership, and its successors and assigns (the "Owner"). • W I T N E'S S E T H: WHEREAS, the Owner is or shall be the owner of a multifamily rental housing development located in the Issuer, known as Thomas Lake'Apartments Project, on the site described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Project will be financed from proceeds of the sale of Issuer's Multifamily Rental Housing Revenue Bonds (Thomas 40 Lake Place Apartments Project), Series 1986 (the "Bonds") issued pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Law.") and pursuant to a Multifamily Housing. Revenue Bond Resolution, dated as of August 1, 1986 (the "Resolution"); and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Bonds will be used to fund a loan (the "Loan") and to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds; and A WHEREAS, interest on the Bonds paid to the registered owners of the Bonds is exempt from federal income tax if the Project continuously complies with Section 103(b)(4)(A) or any successor provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, compliance by the Project with the Law and with Code Section 103(b)(4)(A) or any successor provision is in part within the control of the Owner; and WHEREAS, the Owner, as a condition to receiving Bond proceeds to finance the Project, entered into a Regulatory Agreement with the Issuer dated August 1, 1986 (the "Regulatory Agreement") which contains certain restrictions as to the use and occupancy of the Project; and WHEREAS, the Issuer and the Owner wish to enter into this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement prior to the date upon which ® the Project is placed in service in order to set forth certain additional terms, conditions, and restrictions relating to the construction, development, ownership, and operation of the project. - 2 - NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which hereby are acknowledged, the Issuer and the Owner hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. The following terms shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in this Section 1: "Aoolicable Median Income" means the median income for • households of various sizes in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area (i) as published periodically by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development ("HUD") or by any successor federal agency to HUD in publishing such data, or (ii) if no federal agency publishes such data, as derived from such data as, in the determination of the Issuer, shall be the best available at the applicable time. • "Distribution" means any withdrawal, taking or payment of any earnings or income of the Owner for distribution or other payment to or for the benefit of any of the partners of the Owner. /4 3 - "Maximum Permitted Rent(s)" means the maximum monthly amounts which may be charged by the Owner from time to time with respect to dwelling units in the Project, as determined by the Issuer pursuant to this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement. The Maximum Permitted Rents for all units in the Project shall be the aggregate monthly maximum amounts for all units (based on family size), and shall be equal to one -twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the Applicable Median Income. The Applicable Median Income shall be based upon the actual number of people comprising the household occupying a unit. No unit shall be rented for an amount in excess of one -twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of one hundred forty-four percent (144%) of the Applicable Median Income. Notwithstanding the forecoing limitations on maximum Permitted Rents, in no event shall the monthly rent charged with respect to units in the Project occupied by Qualifying Tenants ® (as that term is defined in section 4 of the Regulatory Agreement), not to exceed twenty percent (20%) of the total units in the Project, exceed one -twelfth of thirty percent (30%) of eighty percent (80%) of the Applicable Median Income of such tenants as adjusted for family size. - 4 - The Maximum Permitted Rents shall be redetermined by the Issuer by adjusting the previously applicable Maximum Permitted Rents by a percentage equal to the percentage change in the. Anolicable Median Income. The Issuer shall make such redetermination(s) within thirty (30) days of the availability of the published data as to Applicable Median Income, and shall inform the Owner in writing within ten ('10) days thereafter of such redetermination. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, the Issuer and the Owner may adjust the Maximum Permitted Rents • by mutual consent and, in the event that the Owner shall certify in writing to the Issuer that the operating expenses of the Project (including debt service payments, taxes and deposits into reserves) exceed the rental income of the Project based upon the then -existing Maximum Permitted Rents, the Issuer and the Owner shall adjust the Maximum Permitted Rents in an amount sufficient to produce rental income from the Project in an aggregate amount adequate to pay all such operating expenses of the Project. Section 2. Regulation as to Rate of Return. The Issuer hereby determines that, for purposes of this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement, the,Initial Equity of the Developer in the Project is the amount by which the total cost of acquiring the land upon which the Project is being constructed, and of constructing, developing, furnishing and equipping the Project A - 5 - (including fees payable with respect to such constructing, developing, furnishing, and equipping) (the "Project Costs") exceeds the amount of the Loan plus any other debt secured by the Project and incurred to fund the Project Costs, as, at the Owner's optio, (a) reported to the Issuer by a certified public accountant within sixty (60) days after certificates of occupancv have been received with respect to all uni+ts in the Project, or (b) certified to the Issuer by the Owner within said sixty (60) day period and approved by the Issuer (the "Initial Equity"). For so long as this Suoplemental Regulatory Agreement shall remain in force, the maximum annual Distribution shall be limited to ten percent (10%) of the Initial Equity; provided, however, that on the date twelve (12) months following the date hereof, and on each annual anniversary date thereafter so long as this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement remains in force, the amount of the maximum annual Distribution shall be increased to an amount equal to the sum of (a) the maximum annual Distribution applicable for the ® preceding twelve-month period, as previously increased (if applicable), and (b) an amount determined by applying the percentage increase in'the Consumer Price Index as determined and published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics during the twelve-month period ending with the day immediately preceding such date to the maximum annual Distribution applicable for the preceding twelve-month period, as previously increased (if applicable). The annual Distribution shall be cumulative and shall be calculated from the date certificates of occupancy have been recceived with respect to all units in the Project; in the event that the full amount of such maximum annual Distribution is not made in any year, the amount_ ^f that portion of annual Distribution not made in such year shall. be carried forward and added to the annual Distribution to be made in future years, until made. Section 3. Reoulation With Respect to Rental Charaes and Occuoancv Charaes. The Owner and the Issuer hereby agree that the Project shall be subject to regulation with respect to rental charges made by the Owner with respect to all units in the Project, so that the rental charges for such units do not exceed the applicable Maximum Permitted Rents. LJ Section 4. Term. This Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until January 2, 1995, unless terminated earlier or extended to a later date by mutual agreement of the parties. Section 5. Amendments. This Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be amended only by a written instrument executed by the parties hereto or their successors or assigns. 40 -7- Section 6. Conflict With Other Agreements Severability. (a) It is the intent of the parties hereto that this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be supplementary to, and not a modification of, the Regulatory Agreement, the Resolution, a certain Building Loan Mortgage and Security Agreement, a certain Loan Agreement, and a certain Assignment of Leases, Rents and other Income and a certain Rental Performance Security Agreement, each of which was entered into between the Issuer and the Owner and dated August 1, 1986 (collectively, the "Transaction Documents"). In the event of any conflict between any provisions of this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement and any provisions of the Transaction Documents, the applicable provision(s) of the Transaction Documents shall control. (b) If any provisions of this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be invalid, illegal and unenforceable, the ® validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining portions hereof shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby. ' Section 7. Governing Law. This Supplemental Regulatory Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Issuer and the Owner have executed this Supplemental Regulatory Agreement, by their duly authorized representatives, as of the date set forth above. CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA By: Title: THOMAS LAKE HOUSING ASSOCIATES, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: its Managing General Partner `. By: 5� MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR 8 CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 12, 1986 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE RECOGNITION/CONNIE MORRISON Enclosed on page is a letter from the city of Burnsville regarding an open house from 6:00 to 7.00 p.m. on December 15 in the Media Center at Burnsville High School to honor Connie Morrison. The City Administrator is planning to attend the open house. Please make reference to the attached letter found and if any member of the City Council wishes to attend, they are certainly welcome. BLACKHAWK TOWNHOUSE APARTMENTS A request was made by Darrell Holden and Mr. Doug Johnson, repre- senting Sharvest, Inc., and owner of the Blackhawk Townhouse/ Walnut Trail Apartments, be required to install an additional chain link fence for the length of the property line dividing Mr. Holden and Mr. Johnson's property. Enclosed on page is a letter from Mr. Johnson indicating compliance with that request. Apparently, members of the City Council have been aware of this on-going concern and this should help finalize that issue. FIRE STATION #4 The City has received inquiries from over 20 architectural firms that are interested in bidding the architectural services for Fire Station #4. An RFP was prepared and sent out asking that all proposals be received no later than 10:00 a.m., Monday, December 22. After the Fire Chief and City Administrator have had ample time to review these proposals, certain firms will be selected for an interview. There are two alternatives regarding the interview process. .1) City Council as a whole can participate in the final interview and review of several architectural firms or 2) One or two City Councilmembers, along with Citi staff, could conduct the interviews and make a recommendation. In any event, the City Administrator and Fire Chief will screen the initial proposals and reduce the selection to less than five for this final consideration. DALE PETERSON'S PARTY Enclosed on page is a copy of a notice that will be sent out to employees and other interested parties regarding Dale Peterson's retirement party scheduled for January 15, 1987. Please mark your calendar for this special recognition. PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT Enclosed on pages through696 is a copy of the November 1986 Protective Inspections report. Please note that the City 1-61 INFORMATIVE MEMO DECEMBER 12, 1986 PAGE TWO has issued 867 single-family permits. The total single-family permits in November 1985 was 733. The total building permits are approximately the same, with 1985 actually leading by 24 permits over November 1986. HRA REPORT Enclosed on pages through /(,3 is the November status report for all assisted housing programs and community development programs in Dakota County. AIRPORT NOISE COMMITTEE MEETING An Airport Noise Committee meeting was held on December 10, 1986, to review the Part 150 Study, Airport Relocation Study and the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor. Administrative Assistant Hohenstein and the City Administrator thought two (2) pieces re of correspondence might be of interest to the City Council con- cerning the airport. Enclosed is a copy of a letter that Jon received from Tim Anderson dated November 20 regarding Mr. Anderson's understanding of the corridor. Obviously the City is expressing a grave objection to Mr. Anderson's letter. Also enclosed is a copy of a letter that Jon sent to Mr. Mark Ryan of the Metropolitan Airports Commission regarding the City Council's action on November 18 defining the correct developments as the City Council enacted. These letters are enclosed on pages through /� . SOLID WASTE ABATEMENT COMMISSION MEETING The Solid Waste Abatement Commission meeting was held at 7.00 a.m., Wednesday, December 10, at which time Lanny Ross, represent- ing the Waste Processing Corporation, made a one -hour -plus presenta- tion on the co -composting system that his corporation is advocating for Dakota County. There was also discussion on the entire Solid Waste Abatement operation that the City will be confronting in 1987 such as, recycling, curbside, what will happen as a result of Goodwill removing their collection box and other related discussion topics. WILLIAMS BROS PIPELINE The City Administrator and Administrative Assistant Hohenstein attending the meeting at the League Office on November 25 to discuss the resolution, action and criteria for the inspection and tighter regulation of pipelines with officials from other communities. The meeting was well attended by suburban communities and it appears that legislation being introduced by representative Vento and Senator Durenberger will be closely followed and endorsed by the League of Minnesota Cities as well as the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities. Some of the issues discussed at that meeting include 1) monitor the Minnesota Pipeline Safety Committee, 2) determine ways to test pipelines and require proper / 5L INFORMATIVE MEMO DECEMBER 12, 1986 PAGE THREE testing, 3) review all existing pipelines to identify pipelines markers, request- copies of plans, identify the pipes that are underground and which ones could infiltrate, check with local Fire Departments for proper training, notify residents with a map of pipeline and newsletter for safety awareness, identify all past problems and, most importantly, identify the types of pipes that do exist within the municipality. The City Administrator has asked Fire Marshal Doug Reid to prepare a history of any occurences the Cityof Egan has had with Williams Pipeline Company. Enclosed on page is a brief account of what has transpired with that company during the past eight years. The City Administrator will coordinate some correspondence to U. S. legislators as well as the draft of a resolution for consideration by the City Council at a future meeting. STORE FRONT/YOUTH ACTION Early in the budget process the City Administrator shared a request from Independent School District #196 and, more speci- fically representatives of Store Front Youth Action, regarding their request for a possible match by all cities located within Independent School District #196, including the District itself for dollars that would match a grant sponsored by the Minneapolis United Way for a counselling program position. It was the deter- mination of the City Council that this request has been made by other school districts and the County and it is felt that the municipality's resources should be directed at its Police Department and not participate in all the other organizations. Apparently, the Store Front Youth Action was unable to secure a grant from the United Way and, therefore, the youth and family counsell1n position will not be funded during 1987. Enclosed on page is a letter from that agency. EMPLOYEE RIGHT -TO -KNOW TRAINING PROGRAM As the Council is aware, employee right -to -know training is mandated by State law. Dakota County Vo -Tech has dbveloped an excellent employee right -to -know training program which is being utilized by many cities and businesses in the area. All employees in the City will be scheduled to attend training sessions during the second week in January. For more detailed information on this program, please refer to a memo from Administrative Assistant Duffy enclosed on pages through 41__ City Administrator �y 163 4�. City Of '- BURNSVILLE 1313 East Highway 13, Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 612/890-4100 December 3, 1986 Mr. Thomas Hedges, Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan, MN 55122 • Dear Tom: Please join us on December 15 to thank Connie Morrison for her dedicated service to the City of.Burnsville as Councilmember and Mayor, and to express best wishes and support to her as our new State Representative. An open house will be held in Connie's honor from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m, on the 15th in the Media Center of Burnsville High School. We hope you will join us for the reception and also for the first portion of the Council meeting when the accomplishments of the Burnsville City Council over the last four years will be reviewed. Sincerely, 4 X6�_ �/ Linda M. Darton, City Manager LMB/mlg /:!��4 SHAREVEST, INC. NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER, SUITE I733 7900 %ER%ES AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS. MINNE50TA 55431 TELEPHONE 16121 835-0922 December 4, 1986 Mr. Dale C. Runkle City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, 'IN 55121 Re: Plat Conditions for Blackhawk Townhouse Apartments Walnut Trails Apartments Dear Mr. Runkle; Arrangements have been made to install the additional chain link fence, as requested. Thank you and the City Council for the clarificiation of interperation to install a fence or heavy vegetation. Cordially, Douglas DMJ/mes cc: Mr. Darold Holden Mr. Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Mr. Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mr. Paul Hauge, City Attorney Joh Y L •r , - .. 11�.. } +h, t ill` 1 t ,( `'tt !' f i 1�1f;iar hTS !{` ,i�ti rLaL Yi �'� • r _...t C' :� ,!, t,.�il'. �7{*r o` JT�Ji: �t.y�„i`l:t �"'` w�k�u`r$9 '(4 '. ` J � '. � 7. y t' ta, '• ' `t r lr i' i I re FFr .- F.p:.'lJ h rf �'f A A n�Y �! Yj ��'a'•F,r �, -1.vLN V ,,, ,l ....: '• DALE PETERSON ` "DEPARTURE° PARTY 7 , ,� 1J`"��1.1, •. y1 DALE PETERSON HAS ANNOUNCED HIS RETIREMENT EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31,1986 WE, HIS FRIENDS AT CITY HALL, PREFER TO THINK HE'S JUST DEPARTING FOR A WARMER CLIMATE AND WILL RETURN TO US IN THE SPRING. (HE SAYS THAT}`J.1"� r(r lrsfFx, HE WILL CONSIDER SOME FORM OF AFFILIATION.) IN THE MEANTIME, WE WILL HAVE A PARTY + t A BUFFET DINNER ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 151 1987 AT THE LOST SPUR 1 COUNTRY CLUB, 2750 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HIGHWAY. SOCIAL HOUR "6:00 - 7:00 P.M. DINNER 7:00 — 8:00 P.M. PROGRAM 8:00 — 9:00 P.M. YOU AND YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER ARE INVITED TO JOIN IN THE FUN. COST OF THE DINNER IS $15.00 EACH, WHICH INCLUDES TAX AND TIP. PLEASE MAKE YOUR CHECK OUT TO DOUG REID AND RETURN IT AND THE ..RESERVATION FORM TO EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD FAGAN, MN 55122 ,'' BY TUESDAY, JANUARY 13 f,a 1 / ' •,! ' ,. •1 J - 'Y� r ,' LSA. ytiy !b '. l., li JY } t •.{ �. ,.. . , _: 1r,a:, 3,rii ' liy -7 ti r_•pi !' [i-�`-L� �'� .�.a ,DALE PETERSON DEPARTURE PARTY •� / ``.•r ! -; ,i 4:i N" , tr 11.^ •� h `- 'THURSDAY, JANUARY 15, 1987 J,t.•M.! y l l \ NAME r YES, I PLAN TO COME NUMBER COMING f3r V' a• fr 5�'I ♦ 1t �� ° NO, I CAN'T MAKE IT BUT I'VE ENCLOSED A CONTRIBUTIONr TOWARD A GIFT FOR DALE. l �f i _!: ,�• ,e fir... a j'-'�: C e.\ t�lj�"fai J •R I•� .1i_1 •'y S�� 1'+,}.e f / � • yj:l ,I �•�, 'i .x ! � i .moi ! !' t *, �'�,p �-. - 1 _ ,.r � Wit(/� k e 4,' k' , V h ♦;. i ! ! �i (( s' Y 1 (}•; .V -f.0 t , �' � / 'r!� tx , G w "n?-� +t�°v +1: i ... . `� ,J). �'{1 .1 .�.. ,�J �H ii•fh F)G:cr N Y '[;tl (; 1'. A+P',I'M-l�'+Y hl� PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - NOVEMBER 1986 NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE Building 80 1 , 505 Electrical Plumbing 122 70 1.676 1. 254 RVAC 83 1,373 Water Softener 1 258 Signs 17,734.00 8,867.00 Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 0 1 NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED rrr� /5 TYPE NO. VALUATION PERMIT FEE PLAN REV FEE TOTAL FEES 16 FOUNDATION 4 $ $ 60.00 $ $ 60.00 867 SINGLE FAMILY 48 3,819,000 17,734.00 8,867.00 104,566.50 32 DUPLEX 2 124,000 638.00 319.00 4,188.00 215 TOWNHOUSE 4 245,000 1,267.00 633.50 8,361.00 10 CONDO 0 1 APT BLDGS 0 0 AGRICULTURAL 0 23 COMMERCIAL 2 1,298,000 3,611.00 1,805.50 29,677.50 86 COMM/IND REMODEL 10 253,050 1,541.50 657.75 2,327.25 8 COMM/IND ADDITION 1 10,000 80.50 --- 85.50 0 INDUSTRIAL 0 0 INSTITUTIONAL 0 11 PUBLIC FACILITIES 0 31 RES. GARAGES 0 27 RES. ADDITIONS 2 17,065 149.00 49.25 207.25 21 SWIM POOL 0 154 MISCELLANEOUS 7 72,225 557.50 160.75 754.75 1 DEMOLISH 0 2 HOUSE MOVES 0 1,,505 TOTALS 80 5,838,340 25,638.50 12,492.75 186,227.75 YEAR-TO-DATE 146,021,196 577,254.00 281,430.70 3,741,708.20 /5 PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE NOVEMBER 1986 COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL & INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWN BLDG PERMIT : PLAN REV PERMIT i ADDRESS & LEGAL OWNER VALUATION FEE FEES TOTAL FEES 12913 4130 BLACKHAWK RD BLACKHA WK L1 .B1 BLACKHAWK PLAZA $ 730,000 $ 2,008.00 6 1,004.00 $ 21,184.00 COMM NI 12842 1260 YANKEE DOODLE RD TOWN CENTER L2 B 1 TOWN CTR 100 2NQ p 568,000 1,603.00 801.50 8,493.50 COMM NI 12891 3130 LEXINGTON AVE L 37 B 5 EAG CTR PK 3 • 3M CO 10,000 80.50 85.50 COMM Al 12845 3470 WASHINGTON DR 11.1 R1, BICENTENNIAL 6TH FEDERAL LAND 4,250 50.50 ._. 53.00 COMM 11 1474 YANKEE DOODLE RD 12851 L1, B 1 BICENTENNIAL 2 SDN PLACE TANi 4,500 50.50 53.00 COMM 11 12855 4178 KNOB DRIVE FIRST COR - L 2, B 2 KNOB HILL PROF pOgATF SEgV 4,000 44.50 46.50 COMM 11 L12868 2020 SILVER BELL RD L1, B 1, DALLAS DEVEL DALLAS DEVEL 17,600 128.50 64.25 201.75 COMM It 12873 1380 CORP CTR DR L2, B2, EAG OFC PK #2 OLD STONE MORl 40,000 238.00 119.00 377.00 COMM It 12885 1325 EAGANDALE CT OAK VIEW L3, B1, EAG CTR IND PK 7 BUSINESS T 92,500 412.00 206.00 664.50 COMM 11 12892 1304 TOWN CTR DR L2, B1, TOWN CTR 70 2ND FEDERAL LAND 24,200 170.50 85.25 268.25 COMM It 12895 3410 FEDERAL DR, #102 NAT'L KARATE L1, BI, BICENTENNIAL 5 STUDIO 10,000 80.50 85.50 COMM 11 12907 1750 YANKEE DOODLE RD L1 B1 R.L.JOHNSON 2ND R.L.JOHNSON 32,000 202.00 101.00 319..00 COMM II• 12906 1380 CORP CTR DR FINANCIAL 2 4,000 164.50 82.25 258.75 COMM It L2 B2 EAG OFC PK 2ND ENERGY CONSUL • •N PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY REPORT DATE NOVEMBER 1986 MULTI -FAMILY BREAKDOWN TYPE OF PERMITS b OF BUILDINGS # OF UNITS YTD # UNITS VALUATION PERMIT FEES SURCHARGE PLAN REVIEB FEES TOTAL FEES DUPLEX 2 1 2 32 $ 124,000 $ 638.00 $ 319.00 $ 4,188.00 3-PLEX 0 4-PLEX 4 1 4 172 245,000 1,267.00 633.50 8,361.00 5-PLEX 5 6-PLEX 30 7-PLEX 7 8-PLEX 152 10-PLEX 20 12=PLEX 48 16-PLEX 32 OTRER` AP7-.- BLDG 144 TOTA1:' 6 2 6 642 $ 369,000 $ 1,905.00 $ 952.50 $ 12,549.00 TOTALS 7........W! PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: NOVEMBER 1985 NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS W VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES_ m 9 36 f 2,124,000 S 11,160.00 $ 4062.00 f 5.580.00 S 71,802.0' 6 -UNIT m L 012, B 00. R.L.S. #4 MYCC S 5.650,000 f 4.708.00 TOWNHOUSE 6 1 6 412,000 2,0]4.00 206.00 1017.00 12i' - OO 16 -UNIT 14.00 T •Oi N �' N m N O 16 xl 2,128.00 '•YI 1,064.00 23 .Oli 2 F••+'W Ila g Ib APTS 23 12 324 11,840,000 n m 15,199.50 448,438.01' TOTALS yd B2 23 787 IA8 1 15,154,000 1 45,721.00 4,176.50 22,860.50 556,158.0C COMM 4151 KNOB DR 252,000 817.00 126.00 406.00 5.055.50 COMM 11318 KNOB HILL PROF PK KNOB HILL EMIR 11275 3777 DODD RD L 1, B 1. VEST PURL II WEST PUBLISH 40.000 278.00 20.00 119.00 777.00 COMM 1]05 CORPOMTE CTR OR 22,687.00 1,700.00 11,741.50 96,980.50 COMM 11203 L 2-4 0 2 EAG OFC PK NW MUT'L LIFE 9,000,000 11066 2147 CLIFF RD 20,000 140.50 10.00 70.25 220.75 COMM CLIFF COMM PK FEDERAL LAND 11709 4860 BISCAYNE AVE CREAT LAKES 4,400 50.50 2.50 57.00 COMM 2.HALUY'S FIRST N O O O O a r - o m m c m 0 0 o c o 0 'o u m 00 O O o O a' O 0 O 0 O 0 O O c o c M O N C O 2 m r y C W P •n m S •N c � N S N i M W O O O m O 1n 0 b P W T P O - rm.• ' .p m m 0 0 0 0 7........W! PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS - MONTHLY INFORMATION DATE: NOVEMBER 1985 NUMBER NUMBER OF NUMBER OF PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK TYPE OF PERMITS BUILDINGS UNITS VALUATIONS PERMIT FEES CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES_ 4 -UNIT 36 TOWNHOUSE 9 36 f 2,124,000 S 11,160.00 $ 4062.00 f 5.580.00 S 71,802.0' 6 -UNIT L 012, B 00. R.L.S. #4 MYCC S 5.650,000 f 4.708.00 TOWNHOUSE 6 1 6 412,000 2,0]4.00 206.00 1017.00 12i' - OO 16 -UNIT 14.00 .00 290.00 COMM 11352 7642 5 KENNEBEC ORIN0 CONDO 1 1 16 778,000 2,128.00 389.00 1,064.00 23 .Oli 2 F••+'W Ila g Ib APTS 23 12 324 11,840,000 30,799.00 2,519.50 15,199.50 448,438.01' TOTALS yd B2 23 787 IA8 1 15,154,000 1 45,721.00 4,176.50 22,860.50 556,158.0C BUILDING PERMIT SUR- PLAN CHECK PERMIT 0 ADDRESS A LEGAL OWNER VALUATIONS FEE CHARGE FEES TOTAL FEES OCCUPA; 11761 3565 KENNEBEC D0. L 012, B 00. R.L.S. #4 MYCC S 5.650,000 f 4.708.00 $ 760.00 S 2.154.00 i 7.922.00 cam 11759 1410 TOWERVIEV RD SPFRRY PARK NW BELL TELE 28,000 184.00 14.00 .00 290.00 COMM 11352 7642 5 KENNEBEC ORIN0 100,000 477.00 50.00 216.50 1.856.50 COMM LEDR PK L A B 3. RONALD A. HAVE 12 J0 EACAN 1ND RD 11349 L 1-4 B ], EAG LTR IND PK OPUS CORP 95,000 418.00 47.50 209.00 674.50 COMM 4151 KNOB DR 252,000 817.00 126.00 406.00 5.055.50 COMM 11318 KNOB HILL PROF PK KNOB HILL EMIR 11275 3777 DODD RD L 1, B 1. VEST PURL II WEST PUBLISH 40.000 278.00 20.00 119.00 777.00 COMM 1]05 CORPOMTE CTR OR 22,687.00 1,700.00 11,741.50 96,980.50 COMM 11203 L 2-4 0 2 EAG OFC PK NW MUT'L LIFE 9,000,000 11066 2147 CLIFF RD 20,000 140.50 10.00 70.25 220.75 COMM CLIFF COMM PK FEDERAL LAND 11709 4860 BISCAYNE AVE CREAT LAKES 4,400 50.50 2.50 57.00 COMM 2.HALUY'S FIRST DAKOTA COUNTY M�l DAKOTA COUNTY HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2496- 145th STREET WEST ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA 55068 612-423-4800 Serving People and Communities M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: HRA Commissioners; Dakota County Commissioners; City Managers; Fred Joy, County Administrator; and Dakota County Planning Department FROM: Mark S. Ulfers, Executive Director lht' �I SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT FOR ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT DATE: December 4, 1986 Enclosed is the November Status Report for all Assisted Housing Programs and Community Development Programs currently being operated in your community and a summary sheet for Dakota County. If you would like to.also receive reports on other Dakota County communities, please call Lori Zierden of our staff. Enclosure ASSISTED HOUSING Status Report for Dakota County** November, 1986 Amount of Elderly Family Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing - Certificates 450 1,080 1,530 +35 Section 8 Existing - Vouchers 0 7 7 +6 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 182 562 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,081 2,157 3,238 +41 Amount of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Commercial Total Increase MHFA Home Improvement Loan 31 131 0 162 0 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 63 77 0 140 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 80 0 90 3 Rental Rehab 38 47 0 85 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 87 127 0 214 0 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 18 0 19 3 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan Commercial & Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 311 1,177 0 1,488 19 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 545 ,680 3 7,228 25 * + = Increase/- = Decrease **Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. 167— Status Report for the City of Eagan November, 1986 * + = Increase/- = Decrease 163 Amount of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing - Certificates 31 163 194 +3 Section 8 New Construction 0 33 33 0 Low Rent Housing 0 17 17 0 236 Rental 0 144 144 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 31 337 388 +3 Amount of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Total Increase iMHFA Home Improvement Loan 0 7 7 0 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 3 6 0 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 7 8 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 3 4 0 Weatherization 5 57 62 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 70 77 87 0 * + = Increase/- = Decrease 163 November 20, 1986 wumP poke 0 cauk I" ft& METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION P. O. BOX 11700 TWIN CITY AIRPORT MINNESOTA 55111 OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR • PHONE (812) 728-1892 Mr. Jon Hohenstein Administrative Assistant City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Dear Jon: I received your letter dated October 22, 1986 as well as your letter of September 25, and will do my best to get to the heart of the matter as I see it. when we met in your offices on September 4, it was my understanding that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was still issuing "runway heading" departure instructions to aircraft using Runway 11R. It was at that meeting and confirmed afterward by me, that I discovered the "runway heading" was no longer being used (at least not regularly) and that FAA Air Traffic Control Tower personnel had gone to issuing departure headings in degrees (i.e. 1150, 1100, etc.). At that time I was also of the opinion that if a pilot were issued a "runway heading" instruction on departure from Runway 11R, he would stay on a 1100 heading. This, however, is also not universally true since I asked a pilot what he would do, and he stated that he would maintain a heading of 1160. Consequently, neither my opinion of what heading was being issued nor my assumption of what heading a pilot would hold appears to be based upon fact. Nonetheless, it is still the Metropolitan Airports Cortmission's (MAC) position that any aircraft departing Runway 11R remaining on or north of the extended centerline of the runway is complying with the intent of our noise abatement procedure for departures in that direction. Whether the FAA instructs pilots to use "runway heading," 1150, 1100, or a combination of these headings and others is, in my opinion, a moot issue as long as the aircraft does not fly to the south of centerline prior to the three (3) mile turn point. Further, I do not believe that this stated position of the MAC is inconsistent with that of which we have always been proponents. Additionally, I do not believe that the procedures currently being used by the FAA to keep aircraft in .!rFirc Lnr�,TION—rn4a 291h AVS. SO.—"! -!T TEREIINAL AREA—MINNEAPOLIS-SAINT PAUL INTEANATI"! -1 L Mr. Jon Hohenstein -2- November 20, 1986 the corridor (which is still their intention) deviates substantially from any other procedure they have used over the years for the same purpose --maintaining the corridor. Whether or not the FAA has gone from a 1050 heading to a "runway" heading to a 1150 could very well be irrelevant if, in fact, the intention and the result is to ensure adequate aircraft movement (runway departure capacity) while maintaining the corridor. I think you will admit that we have made progress in keeping aircraft from residential areas in northern Eagan by bringing to the FAA's attention evidence of the unintentional overfights. I also think that this is evidence of our willingness to work with you and the FAA to resolve problems of this nature. I cannot, however, promise that more can be done than has been done, only that we will continue to monitor the situation and continue to work with the FAA to ensure compliance with our stated objectives. I hope this letter does not serve to further obfuscate the facts in this matter, but if I have not been clear or addressed the issue with which you are con- cerned, please let me know. Also, I apologize for not responding earlier to your September letter, but time catches up with me all too often in this position. I will do better in the future. Cordially; Tim Atmdeerson Airport Director TA/tl 1�5 LED11 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 BEA BLOMQUIST EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 _ me o PHONE: (612) 454-8100 1HOMAS EGAN JAMES SMITH November 21, 1986 VC ISON THEODORELWAACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES MR MARK RYAN wor OVER ENE VAN OVERBEKE EUGENE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION clew 6040 28TH AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 Re: Corrective Elements of the FAR Part 150 Study Dear Mark: In official action taken on November 18, 1986, the Eagan City Council defined three of the corrective elements proposed under the Part 150 Study for further review with respect to noise impacted areas within Eagan. Their approval of these elements for further study was not without significant debate. The Council, in taking its action, reiterated strongly that the highest priority be placed on the reinstatement of noise -compat- ible operational standards for departures in the Eagan -Mendota Heights area. The City Council clearly asserts that the noise compatible planning and zoning which has occurred and continues to occur in the area is based upon understandings with the airport and the Metropolitan Council that air traffic would optimize the noise absorbing capacity of this area through flight track modifications for departures at or about 105 degrees magnetic. Any deviation from that procedure is contrary to well established agreements and understandings between the various agencies of the airport and the City Council. In those areas in which operational procedures cannot be used to minimize the adverse effects of noise, the City Council would consider the following three strategies, listed in order of priority: 1. Soundproof Private Residences 2. Acquire Developed Property 3. Purchase Assurance Program The Council would consider these alternatives with several qualifications. First, that primary consideration for ap- plication of the strategies be within schools and public build- ings. Second, that none of the strategies be implemented in a piecemeal fashion such that the integrity of remaining neighbor- hoods is diminished. Third, that specific consideration be given VA THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY It Mark Ryan November 21, 1986 Page Two to isolated residential pockets which are designated commercial or industrial use in the Eagan Comprehensive Guide Plan. Fourth, that any application of the acquisition or purchase assurance strategies be subject to review and approval by the Eagan City Council to insure that they are applied in the best interest of the City as a whole. In addition, the City Council requested a definition of all funding sources which are anticipated for application to these corrective strategies and the amount aniticipated from each. A specific response to this inquiry is requested. The Council appreciates this opportunity to respond to the Part 150 Study. The Council recognizes the regional importance of this issue and Eagan's part in it. The City has already gone to great lengths to accommodate the airport. The City Council expects the airport to honor the representations and intent of the corridor agreements and to do its part in effecting meaning- ful noise abatement. If you have any questions about this correspondence, please contact me. A specific response is requested, particularly to the matter of funding sources and magnitude. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, Jon Hohenstein Administrative Assistant JDH/jeh 167 WILLIAMS PIPELINE CO. I. July 8, 1977 - Lexington Avenue & Wescott Road - Eagan Fire Department was called to stand by while leak area was excavated. July 11, 1977 - Lexington Avenue & Wescott Road - Eagan Fire Department was called to stand by and foam area while leak was repaired. II. Spring of 1978 - Northwestern Bell replaced buried cable approximately one-fourth mile east of Lexington Avenue. At that time, Northwestern Bell claimed phone cables were damaged from leakage in Williams Pipeline. III. July 13, 1978 - At approximately 9:36 A.M. while Northern Natural Gas Company was relocating their pipeline for the new Cedar Avenue, we had a pipeline rupture that destroyed a home, damaged several others in the area, as well as cars, boats, and other personal property. One of the most difficult problems involves the shut off valve which is located several miles away. It took a period of time to get it shut off and to burn off any remaining natural gas in the line: Northern Natural Gas Company was at the scene. They were a great help in explaining to residents and the fire department what they were doing before and after the fire to restore the neighborhood to its original state. IV. Summer of 1985 - While utilities were being installed in an area approximately 1/2 to 3/4 mile southwest of Lexington Avenue and Wescott Road, evidence was found of an old leak. The City of Eagan had wells in the area tested (wells were given an O.K. from tests.) It was concluded that this material possibly came from the break in July of 1977 and ran alongside the pipeline to a low area. October 31, 1986 Mr. Tom Hedges City Manager Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: STOREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION Adminislralive Offices 5701 Normandale Road. Edina, MN 55424 (612) 926 1851 As you know, back in July, we submitted a Juvenile Justice Grant proposal to the State of Minnesota. We hoped to obtain the start up funding for a full time Youth and Family Counseling position that would be located in Dakota County. Unfortunately, I am unable to give you good news regarding the states decision. We have been turned down for the money. We did not receive a clear rational as to why our proposal was not funded. We appealed the decision on the grounds that the program duplicated an already existing successful program (ours) that had previously been awarded these funds. We were also turned down on our appeal. However, all hope may not be lost. We are still awaiting a decision from the Minneapolis United Way on our proposal for another full time counselor position for Dakota County (we had hoped to provide two full time positions) this decision from the United Way should come in mid November. We are still willing to work with you and other interested parties to jointly develop a strategy to secure funding that �•' would make this project happen. We strongly believe there is a need for these services and if the funding can be found, we would be glad to provide the services. I want to thank you again for the support you have given us and this project. Hopefully, the next time you hear from me, it will be some good news. Sincerely, Scott Beaty Assistant Director Storefront/Youth Action SB:ka Adolescent Sex Offender Program. 7145 Harriet Avenue South. Richfield. AIN (612) 861 1675 Adolescent Victim Counseling Program. 7145 Harriet Avenue South. Richfield. MN (612) 861 - 1675 Delta Place, 1001 Hwy. # 7, Hopkins, MN 55343 (612) 9387040 Edina Project CHarlie, 5701 Normandale Road. Edina. MN 55424 (612) 9259706 Richfield Project CHarlie. 7020 121h Avenue South, Richfield. MN (612) 861 8260 Sloretrom. 7145 Harriet Avenue South. Richfield. MN 55423 (612) 861 1675 Yru111 ACtion. 5701 Nnrmandale Road. Edina, M.N 55434 (612) 926 1 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT DUFFY DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1986 SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE RIGHT -TO -KNOW ACT TRAINING PROGRAM As you know, the City of Eagan is required to enforce the Employee Right -To -Know Act which was passed on the Minnesota State Legislature during the 1983 session. The Employee Right - To -Know Act is intended to insure that employees are aware of the dangers associated with hazardous substances, harmful physical agents or infectious agents that they may be exposed to in their work places. The Act requires the employers to evaluate their work places for the presence of hazardous substances, harmful physical agents, and infectious agents and to provide training to employees concerning those substances or agents to which employees may be exposed. The City has evaluated its work places and has provided written documentation in the form of Safety Data Sheets which are available to inform the employees about any hazardous substances or agents in the work place. The City also originally trained its maintenance, police, and other employees who were exposed to those harmful substances or to harmful physical conditions such as heat, etc. However, it is now time to update the original training and to provide training for employees who were not included in either the original training or last year's update. Dakota County Vo -Tech has developed an Employee Right -To -Know Program which has been utilized by many municipalities and businesses in the area. The program fulfills the requirements of training as prescribed by the State of Minnesota for the Employee Right -To -Know Act of 1983. The program features a video disk and computer-aided instruction on a television monitor. The disk is so programmed that employees while watching can go back and review certain portions of the program if they did not understand them completely. The disk includes two sides, the first side is approximately 1/2 hour in length and includes all general information and background information which is provided for all employees in the City. The second side contains specific sections which can be programmed by the employee watching the disk for individual groups of employees, i.e., road maintenance, police, clerical, etc. Dakota County Vo -Tech also provides an employee guide for each trained employee and a Certificate Of Training for each trained employee. The cost to the City includes a one time charge of $250 plus $b per employee for each time that employee goes through the training program. For this cost, the City receives the use of 17�) Employee Right -To -Know Act Training Program December 2, 1986 Page Two the equipment for a primary time of at least one week. The equipment will be left at the City of Eagan for that time. It also includes the equipment coming back when new employees are hired by the City. All written materials and the Certificate Of Completion are also included in the price. I recommend that the City participate in this program. I have personally viewed the entire training session and it is excellent for fulfilling the intent of the law. I would also recommend that all employees be assigned to complete this training, including basic office (clerical) employees who were not included in the original employee right -to -know training. I would also recommend that the members of the Volunteer Fire ,4 � Department be required to complete this training. If you have any questions regarding this program, please contact me. IIIX Administrdtive Assi f tant HND/jeh 17/