The URL can be used to link to this page

03/07/1989 - City Council RegularAGENDA jl-� REGULAR MEETING SAGAN CITY COUNCIL KAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MARCH 7, 1989 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Approve Resolution Recommending Full Transfer of the State's Motor Vehicle Excise Tax to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund B. POLICE DEPARTMENT P 1. Reorganization IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) Q' A. PERSONNEL ITEMS P• B. LICENSE, Plumbers p 1 C C. LICENSE, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, Pull Tabs at Richards Food 1 & Liquor, 4185 S. Robert Trail p l3 D. LICENSE, Liquor, New Manager/La Fonda De Acebo, 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy 1 (q E. PROJECT 527, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Square Storm Sewer) Continue (� Indefinitely 14F. PROJECT 487R - Receive Final Assessment Role/Order Public Hearing (Braun Court) G. PROJECT 518, Receive Final Assessment Role/Order Public Hearing (Eagan High ' School - Utilities) H. MAINTENANCE VEHICLE #125, Approve Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Miscellaneous Equipment & Attachments) P• '� I. CONTRACT 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Streets & Storm Sewer) � R -J. CONTRACT 88-12, Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagan High school - Utilities) P,1(, K. CONTRACT 87-32C, Final Payment/Acceptance (Chapel Hill Addition - Street & ' Utilities) P•n��L. PETITION to Vacate Portion of Public Right -of -Way (Auge Road) �a M. APPROVE Cooperative Power Association Lease Agreement/Fire Station #3/Well & Pumphouse V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) p7 -OA. PROJECT 546, Cedarvale Boulevard (Street Repair/Resurfacing) 1 •,(DAB. VACATION of Drainage and Utility Easement (Lot 15,.Block 1, Chatterton Ponds) C. VACATION of a Portion of Public Right -of -Way (Hertiage Lane - North of Yankee Doodle) VI. OLD BUSINESS (GRAY)', p 10 A. CONTRACT 88-24, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Lexington Avenue - Reservoir \p• '�\ B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Naegele Outdoor Advertising, To Allow a Billboard 1 Advertising Sign in a LI (Light Industrial District on Lot 2, Block 1, SSW pA Industrial Acres, Along Highway 13 in SWk of Section 19 o C. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Park Center Addition/Federal Land Company, Changing the Land Designation from D -III Mixed Residential (Approximately 21.3 Acres) to C.P.D. (Commercial Planned Development) a REZONING from AG (Agricultural) to a Planned Development District, a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of Six Lots and a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Pylon Signs Located Along the North Side of Cliff Road, West of Rahn Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 3 P,r� ,D. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition/Robert Schlangen, Replat Consisting of Two Lots (2.91 Acres) and One Outlot (6.06 Acres) Located Along the West Side of Slater Road South of Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Sec 31 VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) OA * A. 12-31-88 General Fund Budget Adjustment 0 �Lp5 B. VARIANCE, Villaume Industries, Inc., for 18' Variance from the right-of-way located on Lot 5 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 (2926 Lone Oak Circle) (�,�� C. MODIFICATION To Cliff Lake Galeria Sign Agreement 1 031D. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PIAN AMENDMENT, James Horne, Changing the Land Use \` Designation from D -II (Mixed Residential) to LB (Limited Business), a REZONING of 1.4 AG (Agricultural) Acres to a LB (Limited Business) District on Outlot C of the Preliminary Platted Kingswood 2nd Addition Located Along the West Side of Pilot Knob Road, South of Wescott Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 21 E. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PIAN AMENDMENT, Sterns Addition/Independent School District #196, Changing the Land Use Designation from D -II (Mixed Residential), to E (Schools), a REZONING of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) Acres to a PF (Public Facilities) District, and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of One Lot for an Elementary School Located East of Dodd Road and South of Hackmore Drive (Extended) in the N 1/2 of Sec 25 F. DISCUSS/PROVIDE DIRECTION, HUD Parcels Within the Lexington South Planned `+ e' Development VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (COLA) IB. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) ICI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR i CITY CO FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 1, 1989 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MARCH 7, 1989 CITY COUNCIL IMTIHG After approval is given to the March 7, 1989, agenda, and special minutes for Thursday, February 16, 1989, meeting and regular meeting minutes for February 21, 1989, the following items are in order for consideration. PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Approve Resolution Allowing Full Transfer of the State's Motor Vehicle Excise Tax to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund --The City Engineer's Association of Minnesota (CEAM) has been closely following recent legislation as it pertains to the financing of the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. This is the general source of revenue for the Municipal State Aid System (MSAS) incorporating approximately 38.8 miles of streets within our community. During the recent past, there was considerable effort expended at the state legislature to help ensure a steady source of revenue for the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. Part of this was the transfer of the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) to this fund. However, the 1988 legislature approved a bill that would progressively reduce the amount of transfer to zero in 1992. For comparative purposes, had this transfer been eliminated effective 1989, the City of Eagan would have lost approximately $56,000 in MSAS allocations. Therefore, the Director of Public Works is recommending that the resolution enclosed on pages ._2 and 3 (as recommended by the CEAM) be adopted by the City Council and forwarded to our appropriate legislative representatives. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the resolution regarding funding for street construction in Minnesota. CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RE: FUNDING FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION IN MINNESOTA Res. No. 1989-1 WHEREAS, the City Engineers Association is composed of over 100 members throughout Minnesota representing nearly every city over 5000 population in the state; and WHEREAS, its members are particularly aware of the transportation needs of the cities and counties in the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the street and highway system is deteriorating at a,rate faster than the financial ability to maintain and rebuild it; and WHEREAS, transportation funding is a high priority issue of 1989; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to use road user funds for major street and road construction rather than using property tax; and WHEREAS, county and city government highway and street plans are predicated on proceeds from the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET), many county and city plans will be cut back or not completed. WHEREAS, the percent of local participation in the construction and reconstruction of state owned highways is increasing. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Engineers Association of Minnesota, meeting January 19, 1989, recommends that the 1989 session of the Legislature provide for the transfer of 1008 of the MVET to the road user fund to provide a stable source of adequate funding for the construction and maintenance of streets and highways in the state. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the •sunset• provision included in the 1988 Transportation Funding Bill be removed so that MM revenue can continue to go to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund so that it can be used for city streets and county roads in the State of Minnesota. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting H. POLICE Item 1. Reorganisation of Department Management Personnel— Enclosed on page 5 is a memorandum from Chief of Police Geagan regarding a proposed reorganization of a Police Department management structure. As outlined, the reorganization would eliminate the position of Administrative/Investigation Captain and provide for a reassignment of certain duties to the newly created positions of Patrol Lieutenants which is included in the 1989 budget. The proposal also provides for the creation of a new position of Lieutenant in Charge of Investigation. This position would likewise assume certain duties of the abolished Captain's position while eliminating the Investigative Sergeant's position for the balance of 1989. The organizational chart enclosed on page (o reflects the organizational structure which would result as a consequence of the proposal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the reorganization of the Police Department management structure as presented. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be forwarded to the Governor, the Commissioner of transportation, and to the members. of the 'State Legi"slature,., Unanimouslypassed and adopted at their annual 'meeting this 19th, day of` January, 1989- (3 Segtetary President OF police department PATR=1 GEAG N! CNet of Poke OP@Mft eCap:dn 3830 PNOt Knob Rood VIC E1190N Eogon Mineola 55722 MOM Phone: WZ 454-3900 THOMAS EGM February 28, 1989 DAVID KGUSTAFSON PA%MA MCCREA THEC OM WAGHIER TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS HEDGES �h'�� aN AaaiYamb FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POL CI E VANKE CRY cbn SUBJECT: EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION As you are aware, my recent appointment to the position of Chief of Police has created a vacancy in the Department's Management Team. That coupled with budget approval for two Patrol Lieutenants for 1989 created an opportunity to complete the Police Department Management Reorganization. I am requesting the position of Administrative/Investigation Captain be abolished. In its place, I would like to reassign some of those duties to the two Patrol Lieutenants and also create a new position of Lieutenant in charge of Investigation. This change would enable the department more management control over the line functions, as well as for the balance of 1989, eliminate the need for an Investigative Sergeant and Captain in charge of Investigation. This change will provide a more efficient management system for our department. It is my intent, as a part of the 1990 budget process, to ask for an additional Supervisor in Investigation and that position would be rank of Sergeant. The current problem we have, in Investigation, is that there is no depth to our supervision. As a result, our current supervisor in Investigation gets called on an average of three to eight times over the course of a weekend to appove issues surrounding the Investigation of serious cases. I am also requesting a title change for our Office Manager, Virginia Knight, to that of Support Service Manager, which is more reflective of the position that she holds. Attached you will find a copy of our organizational chart as it reflects the changes I am requesting. It should be noted that for budget purposes this reorganization will incur less dollars than the original 1989 budget request. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police PJG:lb Attachment THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmativ Action Employer nistrat Sec. (1 Services Manager( ) Lead Dispatche .1spatcher b 4 FT 4 P Recept. Clerk Data 2 PT I Typist(2 Entry Police Chief Captain, Administration Captain, Operations Lieutenants Sergeants Police Chief (1j Captain peration Patrol ILt. (2) Lts. I vestigatiflit n Team ATeam B Crimes Property Juvenile 2 Sgts. 2 Sgts. Against Crimes ild Prot Q. tion ersons I (2) Patrol Patrol Officers Officers (151 (1 J) =S- C.S.Oi Control( ) 1989 Budget 1989 Reorganization Request 1 1 1 0 1 i 2 3 5 4 T - 10 9 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting There are thirteen (13) items on the agenda referred to as the Consent Agenda requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. [0. PAREW4 7; I'1Do no 1W4.4, i. Item 1. Clerk Typist Positions — As the Council is aware, the City recently advertised openings for clerk typists and received over 450 applications. Over 150 of the applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for written testing. At the last City Council meeting, appointments were approved for the positions open in the Police Department, Fire Department and at the City Maintenance Facility. The remaining positions are still to be filled: a. Full-time Clerk Typist in Administration -- Finalists for this position were selected from the results of written and typing tests. Interviews are being held on Friday, March 3, 1989, by Administrative Secretary Finnegan and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. It is expected that the name of the candidate recommended for hiring will be presented to the City Council with the administrative agenda or at the meeting on Tuesday. b. Half-time Clerk Typist in Community Development -- Interviews for this position will be held on Monday, March 6, 1989, by Community Development Director Runkle, Community Development Secretary Severson and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. It is expected that the name of the candidate recommended for hiring will be presented to the City Council at the meeting on Tuesday. C. Half-time Clerk Typist in Parks Department -- Interviews for this position will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 19898 by Recreation Supervisor II Peterson, Parks Secretary Nesko and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. It is expected that the name of the candidate recommended for hiring will be presented to the City Council at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of three clerk typists, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PLIIMBERS LICENSES B. Plumbers Licenses --There are eight (8) plumbing firms and one (1) water softening firm that have applied for licenses. All applicants have satisfied the City code regulations and are in order for consideration. Please refer to the attachment enclosed on page R for a list of those firms. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON TRIS ITEM: To approve the eight (8) plumbing licenses and one (1) water softener license as presented. -PLUMBERS' LICENSES MARCH 7., 1989 t. AAA Plumbing by Nevistrom, IN6, 2; -Ashby Plumbing 3. Doody Mechanical, Ificr. 4. LeVahn Brothers 5,. McDonald Plumbing Systems, Inc. 6. Murk Plumbing, Inc. T. Star Plumbing a Excavating 8. Williams Plumbing WATER SOFTENER LICENSE: 1. Minnesota Water Treatment', Inc- Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting GAMBLING LICENSE. MINNESOTA VALLEY EXCHANGE CLUB C. License, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exahange Club, Pull Tabs at Rich rds Food i Liquor, 4185 S. Robert Trail --Enclosed on pages= through � is a copy of a gambling license application to allow for pull tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor sponsored by the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club. The gambling Manager, Mr. Joseph Carlson, and the license application have been reviewed by the Police Department and found to be in order for consideration. The national theme for Exchange Clubs is the prevention of child abuse. The Minnesota Valley Exchange Club which meets at the Blue Cross Building has participated with "in-kind" labor and financial contribution to the Robert B. Lewis House on a regular basis. It is the intention of the club to continue that sponsorship with charitable proceeds that are raised through the sale of pull -tabs. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the gambling license application of the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club for the sale of pull -tabs at Richards Food and Liquor. IC) .a', Charitable G9mbling Control Board Room N-476 Griggs -Midway Building 1821 University Avenue 5612) PaulS Mi0 M to 5a5� LL � GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION CHECK# INSTRUCTIONS: A. Type or print in ink. B. TNra completed application to local governing body, obtain signature and dabs on all copies. and leave 1 eoptc Applicant keeps 1 copy and sands original to the above address with a check. C. Incomplete applications may be returned. D. Enclose license fee with application. Typeof Application: ❑Class A — Fee $100.00 (Bingo, Reffios, Paddlewheels, Tipbcards, Pull -tabs) JOCIm B — Fee 8 50.00 (Raffles, Paddiewheels. Tipboards, Pull -tabs) 01do d■ds o.raeta to: ❑Class C — Fee $ 50.00 (Bingo only) ara..uaoeehle m — -Co udeoard ❑Class D — Fee B 25.00 (Raffles only) Check ons: 01 A. Organization has never been licensed. ❑ 1 B. New she — Give base license number. 0 111 C. Renewal of existing license — Give complete license number. Ell D. Change In dens of an existing license —Give complete license number. - 0 ❑ilss BNo 2. Has organization ever received a Lawful Gambling Exemption Permit from the Board? U yes, give complete A permit number 011belphlo 3. Have Internal Controls been submitted previously on a form provided by the Board? H no, please attach copy. NOW 4- Applicant (Official, legal name of organization) 5. Business Address of Organization I: ,mm - 1 1r.. vr• ? 1 Box 21-124 S. Cfry, State, Zip 7. County S. Business Phone Number l+=r. r;- ^.o _ _ (-" I LF a r 8. Type of organization: ❑Fraternal ❑Veterans ❑Religious iDOthernonprofit* 00 organization Is an "other nonprofit" organization, answer questions 10 through 12. If not, go to question 13. "Other nonprofit" organizations mist document its tax-exempt status. 1111n12No 10. Is organization Incorporated ae a nonprofit organization? d yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and book number: II Attach copy of certificate. a,212 1 i ,,r3 f nr - ElYmONo 11. Are articles filed with the Secretary of State? ©11bs❑No 12. Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If yes, please attach letterfrom IRS or Department of Revenue declaring exemption. ❑1iseS3No 13. Has license ever been denied, suspended or revoked? H yea check ell that a ly: ❑Denied ❑Suspended ❑Revoked Give date: 14. Number of active members 15. Number of years in existence Note: Attech ovidmrcs of three years outs" nce. 7 Yrs. cony of, Cnartrr attact 16. Name of Chief Executive Officer (Cannot be 17. Name of treasurerorparm onwho accounts for other revenues Gambling Manager) of the organization (Cannot be Gambling Manager) Title v Tide Treasurer Business Phone Number Business Phone Number a' 4i L I 5 — 1(;12 ) 454-11100 18. Name of establishment where gambling will be 18. Street address (not P.O. Box Number) conducted pi-h,1(3m i n' 20- City, State, Zip 21. County (where gambling premises is located) Dakotp CG -0001-03(8/88) White Copy -Board Page 1 of 2 Canary -Applicant Pink -Local Governing Body ,t1 { Gambling License Appillication Type of Application: OCless A $Clens B Ogase C OClese D within 23. Are all gambling activities conducted at the premises listed in 018 of this applications' H not, complete a separate application for each premises (except raffles) as a separate license is required for each premises. OYes f3No 24. Does organization own the gambling premises? if no, attach copy of the Isese with terms of at bast one year, and attach a sketch of the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applications. 25. Amount of Rent Per 28. Do you plan on conducting bingo with this license? If yes, give days and times of bingo occasions. NO Month or ties o Occasion Day Time Day Time Day Tana °590.00 11 ONp ONo 27. Has the $10,000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota Statutes 349.20 been obtained? Anel le d For 28. hwutlMo.STaF rQpny Qa%InL#srrr�nyme) U2 Y (: ID If site is located within a township, item 47 must be completed, in 29. Bond Number 30. Lessor Name zchards Foot' and Liquo, vaddition 31, adr�s� 41A5 S. Robert 'Rail 2. City, Stete,Lp 551� 3 am State' 33. GamblingManager Name Joseph Carlson 4ZAII //l � 34 dress lkl5 W. 55 th St. 35 Cih State,16x1Lp 55419 p 38. Gambling Manager Business Phone 37. Dam gambling manager became ( 61' ) BY 1 e"./'' member of organization: I Month Naar ONas Odto 38. Has the license termination form been completed? Attach copy. lbs ONo 39. Has the compensation schedule been approved by the organization? Attach copy. 41. Bank Name 42. Bank Address 43. Bank Account Number GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site at any time gambling is being conducted to observe the gambling and to enforce the low for any unauthorized game or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling bank account whenever necessary to full requirements of current gambling rules and law. I hereby declare that: WITH 1. 1 have read this application and all information submitted to the Board; 2. All information submitted is true, accurate and complete; 3. All other required information has been fully disclosed; 4. 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; 5. 1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; 8. 1 will familiarize myself with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments thereto; a al Na o O egizption I45. Signature (must be signed by Chief Executive Officer) "•e Mceiar Biu �: r•.inneso•,.a Valley 1c ... Tine of signer Presiders'Date Feb. 22,1989 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this application. Byadmowledging receipt, I admit having bein served with notice that this application will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and H approved by the board, will become effective 60 days from the date of receipt (noted below) unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed which specifically disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 60 days of the below noted date. 45. Name of City or County (Local Governing Body) If site is located within a township, item 47 must be completed, in to the county signature. H township Is not organized, vaddition county must sign. Signature of person receiving appliiAtion 47. Name of TowneNp 4ZAII //l � X y : Title f ''e"' 71P C' Date received (80 day period Signature of person receiving application e"./'' begins from this date) 48, -Nam of parsers delivering appdcation to Locd Govarnirg Body Title CG-0me1-03 I8f881 while copy -Board Pagel 4 of 2 11 Conry -Applicant Pkika.oeal GovarNeig Body Agenda Information March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting D. License, Liquor, NervManager/LaFonda DeAcebo--As a consequence of a change in management, LaFonda DeAcebo Restaurant at 3665 SibleMemorial Hi hwa has re Y g y quested that its liquor license be amended to reflect a new manager of the restaurant. Enclosed without page number for your review is a copy of the Police Department report in this regard. The report indicates no findings which would prohibit approval of this change. ACTION TO HB CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an amendment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Restaurant to reflect a new manager: as (3 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting E. Project 527, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Square Storm Sewer) Continue Indefinitely --On February 21, the Council received the proposed final assessment roll for the above - referenced project and scheduled the formal public final assessment hearing for March 21. Further review by staff of the various issues involved with this particular project indicate that we would not be able to respond adequately to the anticipated questions at the final assessment hearing. Therefore, it is recommended that this hearing be continued indefinitely to allow staff the necessary time to provide further research as necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue indefinitely the scheduled final assessment hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer). F. Project 487R, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Braun Court - Streets 8 Storm Sewer) --The staff has received the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and is recommending that the City Council consider scheduling the formal public final assessment hearing to present the final cost to the affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 487R (Braun Court - Streets & Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. G. Project 518, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan High School - Utilities) --The staff has prepared the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and is recommending that the City Council consider scheduling the formal final assessment hearing so that the information can be presented to the affected property owners prior to certification of the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 518 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and order the public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. 14 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting MAINTENANCE VEHICLE #125/APPROVE SPECS/AD FOR BIDS H. Maintenance Vehicle #125, Approve Specs/Authorize Ad For Bids (Miscellaneous Equipment & Attachments) --Recently, the Council authorized the purchase of a tandem dump truck, cab and chassis only, as a part of the approved 1989 budget. Now that the specific make, model and dimensions of the cab and chassis have been determined through this selection process, detailed specifications have been prepared to outfit this vehicle with the appropriate dump boa, snow plow/wing and sanding equipment. Therefore, staff is requesting authorization to solicit formal bids for this miscellaneous equipment and attachments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Maintenance Vehicle #125 (Miscellaneous and authorize the advertisement for a 10:30 a.m. on March 14, 1989. /s To approve the specs for Equipment & Attachments) bid opening to be held at Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88-06/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE BRAUN COURT - STREET & STORM SEWER I. Contract 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Street & Storm Sewer) --The staff has received a request for final payment for the above -reference Contract from our consulting engineer along with a certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and it is recommended that the final payment be issued and the project be formally accepted for perpetual City maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 3rd and final payment for Contract 88-06 (Braun Court - Street & Storm Sewer) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 88-12/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE EAGAN-HIGH SCHOOL - UTILITIES J. Contract 88-12, Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagan High School - Utilities) --The staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with the certification from our consulting engineer of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and is now being recommended for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:To approve the 5th and final payment for Contract 88-12 (Eagan High School -Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 87 K. Contract 87-32C, Final Payment/Acceptance (Chapel Hill Addition -Streets & Utilities --The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a certification from our consulting engineer of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and it is now being recommended for formal acceptance and perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 2nd and final payment for Contract 87-32C (Chapel Hill Addition - Streets & Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. SW wf441L ulLPF4.PESFi µ11J LAP ADDlflofl RrsER. t - LOT Io * Lot 9 LOTb --TS-- � I I---89�--- -- �-----loo'----- ---69� IF. 4. 6f 1,1W 1 PROP05ED ISE LL 's � o t3In Fy lol I n n Q Q :" ■ U l ❑ p E3 li r-1 El � r °� ._. '' 1 LEcTNG 51Ad•yrnTloI dLz W V_.. IZ ■ "- I n 13 17 PIFE.v�ie :.::• . 1 1 \ 1/4 coF ■ co►�w4 j =J 1 A ti n G SE 2T LIME Of 00%+6U.'T27011Fw somfo .-- _ 0 k WILPff gft (Cu hoAp - as"* EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIG. 1 M AssocloW DEEP WELL- D Comm. 4W3 Alch°°• 'W..�,. SITE PLAN so^Le- I'=5o nft 2I,19� Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PETITION TO VACATE PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (AUGE ROAD) L. Petition to Vacate Portion of Public Right-of-way (Auge Road) --Staff has received a petition to vacate a portion of the cul-de-sac on the south end of Auge Road to take into consideration the final plat of the proposed Prettyman Heights Addition. The final plat application has been received and the final plat approval is anticipated to be processed at the same time as the public hearing for this requested vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOCIATION LEASE AGREEMENT/FIRE M. Approve Cooperative Power Association Lease Agreement/Fire Station #3/Well & Pumphouse--As a part of the approved 1988 Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, one of the future wells for the City of Eagan is proposed to be located on the north end of the existing Fire Station #3 site currently being leased from Cooperative Power Association (CPA). Enclosed on page —LO�-- is a location map. The previous Lease Agreement for the Fire Station was exclusive to that particular use and the proposed use for the development of a well with related pumphouse facilities requires the execution of a new revised Lease. This Lease Agreement has been prepared in accordance with the existing Fire Station Lease Agreement and reviewed by the City Attorney's office with concurrence from the Public Works Director and CPA staff. There would be no fee to the City for the ability to use this property for the development of our well facility. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To Power Association Lease Agreement for South Station #3) and authorize the Mayor and City related documents. 19 approve Cooperative Well Field "D" (Fire Clerk to execute all NILo*PF.59 FI 0 QIID pkDorrivJ } - Lot 10 LOT 9 LOT b NzV 4�10 1 2i446;01 ❑ I 101 n . d ..^ i 13 M 13 13 ` I 13 D Q 1. ❑ n a q I 3TOFri6EIJEF 1 �, �• : , rI ,I I E(.EL1NG 51Ap•S7ATI0�1 Nj 13 1] N LOI�G.S i I p 11 13 17 r 1 bolffI LIFE OF Oa %} W.T2' „f �� I _�----------19502'-----�-' k WILDEFI�EK FN hof.p 0 Em �F "'°° EAGAN, MINNESOTA SIG. 1 Assochno DEEP WELL- D �, 49413 ..,. SITE PLAN inSo o�T.Zl,l9� Report For G'EDARVALE BOULEVARD E;agan., Minnesota City Project No.546 FEB,RUA_RY 79 1989 Comm. No. 4212 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Engineers ® Surveyors ® Planners 07 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PROJECT 546/CEDARVALE BOULEVARD (STREET RESURFACING) A. Project 546, Cedarvale Boulevard (Street Resurfacing) --On February 7, 1989, the Council received a feasibility report for the restoration and resurfacing of Cedarvale Boulevard (Old Trunk Highway 13) and scheduled a public hearingto ye held on March 7, 1989. Enclosed on pages �! through Iris a copy of the feasibility report discussing the aspects of this project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer will present the specifics associated with this project and, along with the Public Works Director, will be available to address any questions as a result of this public hearing presentation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 546 (Cedarvale Boulevard- Restoration/Resurfacing) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTIMATE OF COST CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 546 EAGAN, MINNESOTA PREPARED BY ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON A ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS 2021 EAST HENNEPIN AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS', MINNESOTA OSM COMM. NO. 4212 �?a February 7, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Cedarvale Boulevard Project No. 546 OSM Commission No. 4212 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Cedarvale Boulevard Project No. 546. This report addresses the necessary street improvements and utility considerations for the rehabilitation of Cedarvale Boulevard. We would be happy to discuss this report with all interested parties at your convenience. Please give us a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. C.6 Henry C. Osmundson, P.E. Project Engineer HCO:mlj Attachment I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C. Osmundson, P.E. Dated: February 7 1989 Reg. No. 19156 Approved by: L n�� Depar ment i Works - - - - - Date: 7� / C TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE' TRANSMITTAL LETTER/CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS I.. SCOPE I1, FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION III. DISCUSSION A. Storm Sewer B. Street C. Signalization Improvements/Modifications D. Easements and Permits IV. PROJECT AREA/ASSESSABLE.AREAS V. COST ESTIMATE PAGE NO. 1 I 1 1 2 4 4 4 5 VI. ASSESSMENTS: 6 X. PROJECT SCHEDULE 6 APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATES APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX C - BRAUN PAVEMENT EVALUATION DRAWINGS NO: 1-6 a� FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTIMATE OF COST CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 546 EAGAN, MINNESOTA RP id11�1 This project includes construction of a bituminous overlay and storm sewer repair on Cedarvale Boulevard and Nicols Road, and the addition of a turn lane on Silver Bell Road leading to the State Highway 13 intersection. Cedarvale Boulevard is located in the southeast quadrant at the intersection of Minnesota State Highways 13 and 77 (Cedar Avenue). The project encompasses 3,800 L.F. of Cedarvale Boulevard from Nicols Road at Beau De Rue Drive to Silver Bell Road and 300 L.F. of Silver Bell Road. The project is a State Aid project and is eligible for State turnback funding. A location map of Cedarvale Boulevard is located on Sheet No. 1 in the back of the report. II.. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION Three altern at"ives were examined for this, report for the rehabilitation of Cedarvale Boulevard. One alternative is a complete rebuilding of the street into an urban section complete with a storm sewer system and _appurtenances. A second alternative is comprised of an overlay, minor storm sewer modifications, and the use of a pavement reinforcement fabric throughout. A third alternative is simply an overlay and ,repair of an existing storm sewer pipe. All three alternatives are feasible from an engineering standpoint. However, with cost considerations and State funding allocations in mind, we recommend the second alternative. III. DISCUSSION A. STORM SEWER Currently, the on-site drainage system consists of culverts and open ditches conveying runoff from the area to the ditch on the south side of Highway 13 and eventually to the Minnesota River. At the west end of the project, runoff flows from the Nicols Road area to the north through a bituminous ditch and an arched 36" corrugated metal pipe (CMP) on the east side of Nicols Road. It then flows easterly through a shallow, grassy ditch eventually crossing to the north ditch of Cedarvale Boulevard through an existing 24" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). as The grassy ditch is filled with sand and gravel deposited from upstream erosion and will be cleaned and regraded to ensure proper drainage and flow. The bituminous ditch will be removed, the ditch filled in and sloped to the R.O.W. line, and concrete curb and gutter will be constructed on the east side of Nicols Road. The curb and gutter will terminate at the intersection of Nicols Road and Cedarvale Boulevard approximately 300' north of Cedarvale Drive with a bituminous spillway into the regraded ditch. The southerly ditch in front of Mister Donut at the east end of Cedarvale Boulevard will also be cleaned up as necessary. As part of the State turnback funding, MnDOT has agreed to pay for replacing the twin 36" RCP crossings near the Rahn Road intersection. This will also be incorporated into the project. During site inspection, it was discovered that there is underground erosion taking place at the existing storm sewer system on the north side of the intersection of Nicols Road and Cedarvale Boulevard. The bituminous shoulder is subsiding, as well as a portion of the ditch adjacent to an existing manhole. This pipe will also be repaired under this project. The twin 48" culverts crossing Silver Bell at the Highway 13 ditch will be extended as necessary for the additional lane, as will the 42" arched RCP south of the Cedarvale Boulevard intersection. In addition, two catch basins on Silver Bell Road will be removed and replaced. B. STREET 1. Existing Conditions: Cedarvale Boulevard is an existing rural section frontage road extending 3,800 L.F. Road ditches offer drainage relief for the majority of the street. The portion of roadway from Silver Bell westerly 3,100 feet to the intersection with Nicols Road is part of the old Trunk Highway 13 roadbed. The 700' from this intersection to newly rebuilt Nicols Road at Beau De Rue Drive is a newer roadbed built in the 1970's, along with the Cedar Avenue construction. The bituminous surface was last overlayed in 1977 and varies in width from 40' to 601. The surface condition varies widely, with longitudinal, block and transverse cracking throughout. There are a few areas within the bituminous surface where a good crowned section does not exist, resulting in poor surface drainage and the subsequent creation of potholes. The soil boring results show a bituminous thickness of 4.5" to 6.25" and an aggregate base thickness of 0 to 4 inches. The subgrade consists of silty sand with clay and gravel. (See attached Braun Engineering Report -Appendix Q. The current (1988) Average Daily Traffic for Cedarvale Boulevard is 17050 vehicles per day. -2- a( 2. Recommendations: The recommended street improvements were designed using site investigation data, the attached Braun Engineering Soil Borings and Pavement Strength Evaluation Report (Appendix C), consultations with bituminous paving contractors and suppliers, and consultations with MnDOT personnel. The street improvements include the establishment of a center line with an aligned crown, and improving the drainage, turning lanes and rideability of Cedarvale Boulevard and are shown in detail on Sheet Nos. 2A - Fin the back of the report. The center line of the street will be established approximately 35' south of the center line of the 225' R.O.M. for the east -west portion of the roadway and follow the existing curve around to align with the center line of Nicols Road. The crown will be established using leveling courses and/or pavement grinding. The driving lanes will consist of two 12' through lanes on either side of a 14' left turn or dual left turn lane, flanked with 8' bituminous shoulders on Cedarvale Boulevard. At the Nicols Road intersection, the road width will transition into a 44' width to match Nicols Road to the south. Sawcutting of the existing pavement and widening of the roadway will be required to achieve this consistent roadway and lane width. Thermoplastic paving markers will be utilized to delineate the lanes. Detail Sheet No. 3 in the back of the report shows a typical lane schematic. The establishment of the proper crown and alignment will require special surveying and street section engineering. The bituminous surface will be rehabilitated by grinding out and patching the infrequent potholes and the large (greater than 1/2") transverse and longitudinal cracks. The smaller cracks and block cracking are numerous and require a uniform treatment or full bituminous removal. As a result, a paving fabric with an accompanying heavy tack coat will be placed prior to the bituminous overlay. This will prevent moisture from penetrating the bituminous and destroying the base. Also, the fabric will retard the development of reflection cracks. The bituminous overlay will consist of a 1-1/2" mat of No. 2341 modified mix over the entire project. An additional one inch bituminous course will be installed for approximately 700' north of the intersection of Nichols Road and Beau de Rue Drive. This is necessary to attain the strength requirements for a 9 -ton roadway. The shoulders will be over- layed to 1-1/2" maximum thickness tapering to 1" at the outer edge using a 2341 shouldering mix. Fine grading will be required to blend the newly — --3----- - -- constructed shoulder to the existing shoulder. Detail Sheet No. 4 in the back of the report shows the typical street sections. The Silver Bell Road intersection improvements include the addition of one 14' northbound lane beginning at the Beau de Rue Drive - Silver Bell Road intersection and terminating at State Highway 13. This would result in 3 northbound lanes: a left turn/through lane, a through lane and a right turn only lane. This will be accomplished by extending the roadway 14' to the east, with appropriate medians and striping. B-618 concrete curb and gutter will be installed on the east side for the 300 L.F., along with a 1-1/2" 2341 modified bituminous overlay over the entire road width. (See Detail Sheet No. 2F). C. SIGNALIZATION INPROVENENTS/NODIFICATIONS In order to accommodate the additional roadway width on Silver Bell Road east of T.H. 13, the traffic signal mast arm pole in the southeast quadrant will be relocated and repainted. It is recommended that traffic operations be monitored and counts be taken at Silver Bell and Beau de Rue to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at this intersection in the future. D. RIGHT OF WAY AND PERMITS A temporary construction/slope easement will be required for the ditch repair on Nicols Road. All other construction will take place within the existing 225' R.O.W. on Cedarvale Boulevard; the 66' R.O.W. on Nicols Road; and the 66' R.O.W. on Silverbell Road, thereby requiring no additional right of way. There are no permits required, but the plans will be reviewed by the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. As a MnDOT State Aid project, the plans must meet DOT standards and will advance through the MSA process to obtain the approvals necessary for cost participation. IV. PROJECT AREA/ASSESSABLE AREAS The properties to be assessed for the project are shown on the attached Assessable Properties Drawing (Sheet No. 5) in the back of the report. Generally, the construction will affect the Northeast Quarter of Section '19, which is the Cedarvale Shopping Center area north of Beau de Rue Drive. The areas that benefit and are proposed to be assessed for these improvements are as .follows• All parcels are in the N.E. 1/4 of Section 19, Township 27, Range 23 100-08 010-08 020-08 030-08 040-08 020=07 051-06 011-06 010-06 050-04 020-04 010-04 Cedarval'e'Second Addition: Outlot A and Lot 2 Outlot B and Lot 3 Outlot C and Lot 4 V. COST ESTIMATES A detailed cost estimate can be found in the attached Appendix A. A summary of these costs is as follows: A. Cedarvale Boulevard Storm Drain $ 19,600 B. Cedarvale Boulevard Streets 257,500 C. Silver Bell Road Improvments 69.900 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $347.000' The above referenced total estimated project cost includes a contingency factor and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated •at 30% and include legal, engineering, administrative and fiscal. M0 VI. ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the parcels shown in Appendix B. The benefitted properties will be assessed according to the assessment cost estimate for a normal street overlay detailed in Appendix A, Section D. The recommended project includes the realignment of the centerline of Cedarvale Boulevard and an improvement of the geometrics of the Silver Bell Road and State Highway 13 intersection. Also, there are ordinarily two benefitted sides to a street improvement project, which is not the case here. Most of the property on the north side of the boulevard is State Highway right of way and the private property on the north side was previously assessed for Cedarview Drive improvements which provides them individual direct street access. Using this information, an acceptable overlay assessment per front foot was calculated by dividing the normal overlay project cost by the total front footage. For this project, this estimated overlay assessment per front foot equals $15.06. The estimated assessable front footage equals approximately 3590 L.F. In addition, the curb and gutter along Nicols Road north of Beau de Rue Drive will be assessed to the benefitted proper- ties. The assessments will be spread over 10 years at the interest rate determined by the bond sale used to finance the project. Project Cost Assessments 1. Cedarvale Boulevard Storm Sewer $ 19,600 2. Cedarvale Boulevard/Nicols Road 257,500 Streets 3. Silver Bell Road Improvements 69.900 TOTALS ........................ $347,000 VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications MnDOT Review (30 Days) Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes -6- 02/07/89 03/07/89 03/21/89 04/28/89 05/02/89 07/89 09/89 05/90 W $57,585 $57,585 Trunk Funds/ Other Sources $ 19,600 199,915 69.900 $289,415 APPENDfiX A Page PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 546 A. CEDARVALE BLVD. STORM SEWER B. CEDARVALE BLVD. - STREETS TOTAL UNIT UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL 36' R.C.P. 180 L.F. @ S 60.00 = S 10800.00 48' R.C.P. 24 L.F. @ S 70.00 = S 1680.00 REMOVE & REPLACE 48' RCP 24 L.F. @ $ 50.00 = $ 1200.00 TOTAL @ f 1.00 = S $ 13680.00 +10% CONTINGENCY L.F. @ S 1.00 = f 1368.00 TOTAL STORM TRAIN CONSTRUCTION COST 700 C.Y. @ S t 15048.00 +30% ADMINISTRATION C017AN BORROW 2000 C.Y. @ $ 4352.00 TOTAL STORM DRAIN PROJECT COST 10000.00 CLEAN / FINE GRADE DITCH 1000 f 19600.OD B. CEDARVALE BLVD. - STREETS TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL SAWCUT BITUMINOS 5500 L.F. @ f 1.00 = S %00.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DITCH 600 S.Y. @ S 1.00 = S 600.00 REMOVE BITUMINOS ROADWAY 3500 S.Y. @ f 1.00 = S 3500.00 REMOVE PIPE (ALL SIZES) 200 L.F. @ S 1.00 = f 200.00 CO@MDI EXCAVATION (DITCH) 700 C.Y. @ S 3.00 = S 2100.00 C017AN BORROW 2000 C.Y. @ $ 5.00 = $ 10000.00 CLEAN / FINE GRADE DITCH 1000 L.F. @ f 2.00 = S 2000.00 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CL 2 (100% CR.) 850 TON @ $ 8.00 = $ 6800.00 2341 BITUMINOUS WEAR COARSE (MOD.) 2200 TON @ f 11.00 = f 2420D.00 2341 BITUMINOUS SHOULDERING COURSE 900 TON @ $ 12.00 = $ 10800.00 2331 BITUMINOS LEVEL COARSE (MOD.) 1000 TON @ $ 12.00 = S 12000.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE 260 TON @ S 160.00 = S 41600.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 7650 GAL. @ $ 1.00 = S 7650.00 Y DEEP CRACK GRINDING 3200 S.Y. @ $ 2.00 = $ 6400.00 BITUMINOS PATCHING 3200 S.Y. @ S 3.50 = $ 11200.00 PAVING FABRIC 23100 S.Y. @ f 1.00 = S 23100.00 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER B 618 700 L.F. @ $ 5.00 = S 3500.00 SOIUIIGi 2000 S.Y. @ 6 2.00 = 6 4000.00 F 6 I TR SIGNS (COMPLETE ASSEMBLY) 2 FA. @ S 200.00 = f 400.00 NEM & REP TR SIDS 4 EA. @ $ 150.00 = $ 600.00 PER@V@€NT LANE MARK - WHITE SOLID 9150 L.F. @ S 1.50 = S 13725.00 PERMANENT LAGS KW - YELLOW SOLID 4800 L.F. @ $ 1.50 = f 7200.00 PERMANENT LANE MARK - YELLOW STRIPED 1400 L.F. @ S 1.50 = f 2100.00 PERMANENT LAWS MARK - ARROWS 26 EA. @ S 125.00 = $ 3250.00 TOTAL S 180075.00 +10% LDNTINGENCY 18007.50 TOTAL STREET CONSTRUCTION COST f 198082.50 +30% ADMINISTRATION 59417.50 TOTAL STREET PROJECT COST 3� S 257500.00 C. SILVER BELL ROAD LANE ADDITION TOTAL PROJECT COST A. CEOARVALE BLVD. STORM SETA:R TOTAL 19600.00 B. CEDARVALE BLVD. STREETS WIT 257500.00 C. SILVER CELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ITEM RJANTITIES (NITS S PRICE TOTAL ORMAAAR BORROW 1500 C. Y. @ f 5.00 = f 7500.00 COMMON EXCAVATION 200 C.Y. @ f 3.00 = S 600.00 CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) 170 TON @ f 7.00 = f 1190.00 2331 BASE COtJRSE 125 TON @ $ 10.00 = S 1250.00 2341 MOD BIT NEAR COURSE 210 TON @ f 11.00 = f 2310.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTLRE 20 TON @ f 160.00 = f 3200.00 BMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CDAT 110 GAL @ f 1.00 = f 110.00 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B 618 300 L.F. e f 20.00 = f 6000.00 REMOVE CLRB &GUTTER 100 L.F. @ f 1.00 = f 100.00 STRIPING 1200 L.F. @ f 0.07 = f 84.00 12' R.C.P. C.B. LEADS 30 L.F. @ f 20.00 = f 600.00 15" R.C.P. C. B. LEADS 30 L.F. e f 25.00 = f 750.00 48' R.C.P. .48 L.F. @ f 70.00 = f 3360.00 42" ARCH R.C.P. 16 L.F. @ f 70.00 = f 1120.00 REMOVE & FlEFUCE 42' OR 48' RCP FES 3 EA. @ f 100.00 = f 300.00 REMOVE RCP 60 L.F. @ f 100.00 = f 6000.00 REMDVE STRUCTURE 2 EA. @ f 500.00 = f 1000.00 CATCH BASIN TYPE A 1 EA. @ f 700.00 = $ 700.00 CATCH BASIN TYPE B I EA. @ S 700.00 = f 700.00 RELOCATE POLE, F & I MAST ARM I L.S. @ f = f 10000.00 PAINT/REFINISH MAST ARM/POLE I L.S. @ f = S 2000.00 TOTAL f 48874.00 +IDX CONTINGENCY 488/,40 TOTAL CONSTRLCTION COST f 53761.40 +30% ADMINISTRATION 16138.60 TOTAL PRO ECT COST f 69900.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST A. CEOARVALE BLVD. STORM SETA:R f 19600.00 B. CEDARVALE BLVD. STREETS f 257500.00 C. SILVER CELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS f 69900.00 TOTAL PROJECT S 347000.00 ml 33 Mase D. ASSEESMENT COST'ESTIMATE FOR A NORMAL OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE,FON STREET OVERUAY ITEM 2341 BIT. HEAR COURSE (MOD:- 201 BITUMINOS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 2' DEEP CRACK GRINDING BITUMINOUS PATCHING STRIKING TOTAL +IOZ CONTINGENCY TOTAL STREET CONSTRICTION COST +V% ADMINISTRATION TOTAL.STREET PROJECT COST STREET LENGTH = FRONT FOOTAGE = ASSESSMENT PER FRONT FOOT = TOTAL QUANTITIES KNITS TOTAL 2800 TUN e S 485 TUN e S 1270 OAL. e S 3200 S.Y. B $ 3260 S.Y. e f 23100 L.F. e $ 3850 L. F. 7700'L.F. $15.06 UNIT PRICE TOTAL 11.00 = s 30800:00 160.00 = S 29600.00 1.00 c S 1270.00 2.00 = '6 6400.00 3.50 = f 11200.00 0.07 = $ 1617.00 S 80887.00 8088.70 f 88973.70 27024.30 S 116000.00 (TOTAL PROJECT COST DIVIDED, BY FRONT FOOTAGE) rdse APPENDIX B 25 Page PRELVIINARY ASSES. t ROLL & smm ASSESSMENT ESTIMATE GEIHARVALE ifYJL_miARD CITY PROJECT NO. 546 PFRCEL (ALL PARCEL M.FBERS ARE IN 'NE 1/4 S19, T27, ;M.) 100-03 010-08 020.08 030-08 040-03 020-07 051-06 011-06 &'010-06 IF S 4—E L5.NERSHIP CEDARVAL E SECO�Z ADDITION: COTLOT A & LOT 2 IF SAMEONNERS-HIP VJTLOT P & LOT 3 IF SArt G:d)�.!P OLRLOT C & LOT 4 IF SAME CWNEK IP 050-04 020-04 010-04 TOTAL S ESTIMATED OVERLAY CDRB & OUTTER ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LENGTH (ASSESSABLE' LENGTH (ASSESSABLE LENGTH TOTAL (FR. FOOTA(E)(1) x $15.06) (2) X S5.3B) (2) ASSESSMENT 120 L.F. $1,807.20 + 5645.60 = $2,452:80 532 L.F. $8.011.92 + $2,862.16 = S10,874.08 100 L.F. $1,506.00 + NA = $1.506.00 100 L.F. $1,506.00 + NA = $1,506.00 158.8 L.F. $2,391.53 + NA = $2,391.53 150 L.F. S2,259.00 + NA = $2:259.00 1068.10 L.F. $I5,0S.59 + NA = 5161085.59 310 L.F. $4,668,60 + NA $4,668,60 207.11 L.F. 53,119.08 + NA = $3,119.08 200 L.F. $3,01200 + NA = $3,012.00 149.79 L.F. $2, 255. S4 + NA = $2,255.84 150 L.F. 52,259.00 + NA $2,259,00 200 L.F. 53,OIZ.04 + NA = $3,012.00 145 L.F. $2,183.70 + NA = $2,183.70 3590.8 L.F. 554,077.45 + $3,507.76 = $57,585.21 (1) EvTMATED LD.WHS. )M T:-WO!JGR INVESTIGATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTIONNS FOR EXACT LENGTHS. (2) —THIS IS T,$ EESTIMATED ASSeow., COST PER FRONT FOOT. T)$ RATE L:SED NiLL BE C011PL D FROM THE PROJECT COSTS *B CONSTRIx'TED. MA = NO. 4?p:-lL+, KE. p?.B & GUTTER IS NOT PLANNED FrR rE STREET F,ROITING THESE PrRERT:IES. 3 (4::0 APPENDIX C 3-7 1 I PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATSON FOR CITY OF EAGAN. August, 1988 Commission No. 88-433 co An expansion of MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. 1404 Concordia Avenue. St. Paul. MN 55104 — 612 / 644-29% September 2, 1988 OSM Bud Osmundson 2021 East Hennepin Minneapolis, MN 55413 BRAUR'" PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES esu... Dear Mr. Osmundson; 1 Enclosed please find a copy of our report entitled PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION FOR L CITY OF EAGAN Ouaiity Services Since 1957 GG 91. PE &.c ' EuWWL SYW..n PnD D..caa PE 1W.e. W Ehg P E 6re[tn a Ergme.rng Moen L Dm.rge. PE Denarr a4� We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and to OSM. Should there be any questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please do not hesitate to call. i I I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. David W. Janisch, P.E. Registration Number: 18562 Date: 9�aj88 Pavement Manageme Ing . Research AND semmo mm awces 1 Nmtreagulis Hmvng SI CIOYO a &oLMswi 11N ! & nal LLnnt are Wilbsmn ND ! &IlingS aW BDleman. NIT t Cn¢ago It INTRODUCTION The consulting firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron and Asssociates, Inc. contacted Braun Pavement Technologies to conduct deflection testing on Cedarvale Boulevard in the City of Eagan. The testing was done on August 16, 1988. Cedarvale Boulevard was tested using a Model 2000 Road Rater between Silver Bell Road and Beau - d -rue Drive. The pavement was tested at 100 foot intervals in each direction. The test points were staggered so as to provide a 50 foot test interval for the entire length of the pavement. In addition to the deflection testing, three cores were taken to establish the pavement thickness and subgrade type for this roadway. The results of the boring are listed in Table 1. It was thought that there was an old concrete pavement under the asphalt surface. The borings did not find any evidence of this. The asphalt thickness used in the deflection analysis is 4.5 inches. The subgrade soil was plastic. The purpose of this report is to make recommendations as to the in-place pavement strength, the effective subgrade R -value, and the recommended overlay thickness, if any, for the section. 40 T A4 L E 1. @'0:R I ,N 0 RESULTS F'0 R C.E D:A R V A'L E e60 WL E'V,AA D SAMPLE NO. 1. 2 3 sItumI nous T I c me.s.s (1n.) 4.S0 6.23 4. 5'0' C o,mcreta I 1ck:nwo,s (In..) 0.010' 0.00 0.0;0 A,Ogreg,ate ba.s+,e Thickness (In.) 4:.00 0.00 3.00 A.00base r/,d''steri'orsted bituminous S,u)b.0 ra d,e Try p:0 S i t t y s a,n d e l(I t y S t t t y s+a'md it 1_ t h Owe Vs I t o C l e y'+e y s,e n;d 'f 1 me, 1: 1 /2 f t a. plo,s^s 1 b t e AO O. g r I n a d ba s,e fIme 0,ra Imod EQUIPMENT USED A Model 2000 Road Rater (Figure 1) was used for the nondestructive testing (NDT). The Road Rater is an electro - hydraulically activated device that super -imposes a dynamic sinusoidal load onto a static load. The amplitude and frequency of the load are adjusted by the operator of the Road Rater for each test point. The static load is mechanically adjusted and is normally set on a daily basis. For this project, the static load was set at approximately 3500 pounds. The dynamic load was held between 3500 and 4000 pounds. This resulted in a continued series of pulses applied to the pavement over a constant static as shown in Figure 2. An 18 -inch diameter steel contact plate was used to apply the load to the pavement. The deflections were measured at the center of the load area and at 12, 24, and 36 inches behind the center of the load plate. A diagram of the deflection basin and deflection measurement locations is shown in Figure 3. Figure 1. Model 2000 Road Rater O a O INCREASING TIME Figure 2. Diagram of Road Rater Loading DYNAMIC LOAD (Peat to Poon) 2 x x 0 Z^ W O O FO W Wp W Y�j U. 4m luz O 1 p 1 O 1 Ov 1 --------------------------_....,.,,.,..,�.��.��.,.,,,.._....-- DEFLECTION BASIN SHAPE IS A FUNCTION OF 1) THICKNESS OF THE LAYERS 2) ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE LAYERS � COMPRESSION « TENSION Figure 3. Deflection Basin as measured by the Model 2000 Road Rater �3 DEFLECTION BASIN SHAPE IS A FUNCTION OF 1) THICKNESS OF THE LAYERS 2) ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE LAYERS � COMPRESSION « TENSION Figure 3. Deflection Basin as measured by the Model 2000 Road Rater �3 BASIS OF ANALYSIS The analysis was based on the results of the deflection tests and also on information furnished by the client as follows: -the average annual daily traffic -the thickness of asphalt surfacing -the type of soil in the subgrade i In addition to the determination of the allowable spring axle load limits for each section as listed in Table 2, design analysis were included as requested which includes the following: -the effective aubgrade soil R -Value -the recommended NDT thickness design and/or reconstruction thickness as appropriate The results of the design analysis for each section are included on a separate page followed by the computer printouts for that section for easy reference. The deflection tests are at intervals of about 0.1 mile and the analysis and recommendations have been made over sections of roadway with logical termini. Determining these recommendations makes use of statistical procedures to prevent the adaption of overly conservative values. This procedure raises the possibility that the recommendations may not reflect the condition or strength at some points. Therefore, the condition of all the roadway surfaces should be monitored periodically to observe whether occasional spots of distress occur. The Braun Pavement Technologies program NDT was used for the analysis of the deflection data. NDT incorporates the structural relationships that were developed by MN/DOT Office of Research and Development and the thickness design relationships for flexible pavements from the "AASHTO Guide For Design of Pavement Structures -1986". The design equation used is for an 85 percent confidence level based on the average AASHTO recommended factors. The traffic volumes provided by the client were transformed into daily equivalent 18,000 pound axle loadings (ESALs) for the analysis. This conversion was based on statewide averages for vehicle distribution and weights as shown in Chapter 7, Pavement Design of the ROAD DESIGN MANUAL, Part II. A tabulation is included shoving the typical vehicle distributions and truck factors. The ESALs may vary by a considerable amount on low volume roads and, if it is found that the ESALs are not representative of the section, the analysis should be done over with the current traffic data. The analysis results and design recommendations for each of the sections evaluated are placed directly before the computer tabulations and plots for each of the sections evaluated. Lv� I ROAD RATER DATA DESIBN ANALY919 SECTIONS 4s CEDARVALE BLVD. FROM SILVER BELL ROAD TO BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE ANALYSIS This section is 3830 feet long and consists of 4.5 inches of asphalt on a plastic subgrade. 1987 ADT for this section was 8000 which equates to.a 1988 daily ESAL count of 74.7. The surface condition rating was 3.4 with low to medium severity longitidinal cracking, block cracking and transverse cracking located at a majority of the test points. The recommended allowable spring axle load based on deflections is 8-t6n per axle. t f DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 R -value 13 EGE = 20.0 inches Area 1 from Silver Bell Road to 233 feet south Overlay 1.0 inches Area 2 from 233 feet south of Silver Bell Road to 3500 south Overlay = 0.0 inchesl Area 3 from 3500 feet south of Silver Bell Road to Beau -D -Rue Drive Overlay = 2.5 inchesl DISCUSSION There are three distinct areas with regards to the deflection analysis. Area 1 is from Silver Bell Road to test location 233. Area 2 is from test location 233 to test location 3500. Area 3 is from test location 3500 to Beau -D -Rue Drive. The effective subgrade R -value is consistent throughout all areas. However, the in-place pavement strength and recommended overlay thickness varies within these areas. lThere are exceptions within Area 2 to the 0.0 inch overlay recommendations. These are at test locations 1945 and 2045. Overlay recommendations for these test points is 0.7 inches. A 1.0 inch overlay from Clearview to 200 feet south will increase the structure to a 9 -ton capacity. 2Area 3 exhibits the lowest pavement strength of all of the three } areas. Recommended allowable axle loads as low as 6.8 -tons per axle and overlay requirements as high as 2.4 inches are found in this area. It is recommended that a uniform 2.5 inch overlay be i applied for the entire length of Area 3 if this roadway is to carry 9 -ton loads. LO DISTRIBUTION FACTORS BY VEHICLE TYPE AND EQUIVALENT SINGLE AXLE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR CITY OF EAGAN ROADWAY: CEDARVALE RD FROM: SILVER BELL ROAD TO: BEAU -D -RUE DR * THE PERCENT AADT IS BASED ON THE VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY LISTED IN THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL. THIS DISTRIBUTION IS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE REPORTED PERCENT HCADT (VEHICLES 4-10). ** THE ESAL FACTORS LISTED WERE OBTAINED FROM THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY. �9 - LATEST AADT COUNT = 8000 1987 1988 PROJECTED AADT = 8106 REPORTED PERCENT HCADT = 5.00 TRAFFIC PROJECTION FACTOR. = 1.30 PERCENT DESIGN NUMBER. OF VEHICLE OF LANE VEHICLES ESAL DAILY DESIGN TYPE AADT AADT PER LANE FACTORS LANE ESAL 1 76.4 % X 4053 3097 X 0.0004 1.2 2 16.2 % X 4053 655 X 0.0070 = 4.6 3 2.4 % X 4053 98 X 0.0100 = 1.0 4 2.2 % X 4053 89 X 0.2300 = 18.8 5 1.4 % X 4053 58 X 0.4500 = 26.3 6 0.0 % X 405. 0 X 0.1500 0.0 7 0.1 % X 4053 3 X 0.3000 = 1: O 8 0.4 % X 4053 17 X 0.5900 = 10.1 9 0.0 % X 4053 O X ------ = 0.0 10 0.8 % X 4053 34 X 0.3400 = 11.7 100 ------ --------- 4053 -------- - DAILY ESAL ------------ 74.7 * THE PERCENT AADT IS BASED ON THE VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY LISTED IN THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL. THIS DISTRIBUTION IS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE REPORTED PERCENT HCADT (VEHICLES 4-10). ** THE ESAL FACTORS LISTED WERE OBTAINED FROM THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY. �9 - BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 08-433 DATE OF TEST IM/DIY): 6/16188 CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 75 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 112-114 ASPHALT THICKNESS finches): 4.5 SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 j SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.85 COMMENTS: MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS. from: SILVER BELL ROAD to: BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE COMMENTS CIL SILVER BELL RD. PUNT CHS M -BLOCK, CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK CR L -LONG CR N -LONG CR M -TRANS CR M -LONG CR M -LONG CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR N -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR CIL RAHN RD L -BLOCK. CR M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CP. IRDMB CR L -TRANS CR PATCH/CULVERT L -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR CIL CLEARVIEN DR L -TRANS CR PVMT CHB TEST -SENSOR READINGS (MILS)- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DM BEFL SUBGRADE B.E. RESTRICTION (FEET)- (KIPS) (HZ) I1 12- 13 14- R -VALUE- 11NCHES) (TONS/RILE) 1 -- - 0 R -- --- - - --- - - -- 65 l 2.99 15.0 5.95 . 4.36 2.73 1.81 13 22.5 9.1 102 R 3.00 15.0 5.44 3.19 1.78 1.26 21 17.0 6.4 I 155 L 2.96 15.0 6.36 3.85 2.23 1.47 16 16.6 7.8 201 R 3.01 15.0 4.17 2.85 1.81 1.37 21 24.3 11.0 233 L ---- ---- --- -- -- - - - 250 L 2.97 15.0 5.B5 4.32 2.72 2.02 12 23.6 9.4 305 P. 2.99 15.0 5.07 3.49 1.98 1.36 18 21.3 9.5 354 L 2.99 15.0 4.46 3.12 1.68 1.17 21 22.2 10.2 398 R 3.03 15.0 4.16 3.30 2.50 1.91 12 32.9 13.2 1 I 453 L 3.05 15.0 5.32 3.62 1.97 1.14 19 20.1 9.2 504 R 3.00 15.0 5.17 3.79 2.70 1.92 13 26.2 10.5 556 L 2.99 15.0 5.72 3.79 2.72 1.57 15 21.3 9.1 600 R 2.95 15.0 3.49 3.02 2.54 2.11 9 40.3 16.3 648 L 3.02 15.0 5.19 3.75 2.20 1.52 16 22.7 9.8 710 R 3.06 15.0 4.36 3.3B 2.34 1.66 15 2B.6 12.0 i 751 L 3.00 15.0 4.53 2.91 1.54 0.95 24 19.9 9.6 B04 R 3.11 15.0 3.92 2.43 1.30 0.73 32 20.4 10.4 853 L 2.96 15.0 4.66 3.37 1.89 1.16 19 22.5 10.1 ( 902 R 3.02 15.0 4.57 3.05 1.69 1.02 22 20.9 9.9 t 953 L 3.05 15.0 4.22 2.94 1.49 0.94 24 21.9 10.4 1003 R 2.93 15.0 4.50 3.23 1.79 1.13 20 22.5 10.2 ! 1055 L 3.07 15.0 4.14 2.67 1.58 1.08 24 22.9 10.8 1 1100 R 2.92 15.0 5.06 4.08_ 2.34 1.03 15 23.0 9.8 1140 L 3.05 15.0 3.76 2.61 1.28 0.74 29 22.3 10.9 1146 R ---- -- -- - --- --- - -- -- 1200 R 3.14 15.0 4.55 3.10 1.71 0.98 23 21.6 10.2 1252 L 3.02 15.0 4.53 3.15 1.83 1.27 20 22.8 10.3 1301 R 3.09 15.0 6.24 4.37 2.72 1.73 14 21.1 8.8' 1354 L 2.93 15.0 4.46 3.21 2.01 1.37 18 24.3 10.6 I 1403 R 3.04 15.0 4.93 3.44 1.91 1.18 19 21.5 9.7 1451 L 2.96 15.0 4.49 3.32 1.86 1.17 19 23.4 10.4 1501 R 3.08 15.0 4.92 3.72 2.61 1.95 13 28.0 11.2 1544 L 3.07 15.0 3.75 2.81 1.54 0.98 25 25.0 11.7 1595 R 3.02 15.0 4.40 3.29 2.15 1.51 17 26.4 11.3 1645 L 3.11 15.0 6.62 4.93 3.04 1.97 12 22.1 8.8 1700 R 3.00 15.0 4.21 3.25 2.00 1.25 18 25.9 11.4 1749 L 3.04 15.0 6.02 4.IB 2.30 1.41 15 19.8 8.7 1805 R 3.00 15.0 5.05 3.84 2.42 1.57 15 24.7 10.3 I 1848 L 3.00 15.0 5.44 3.76 1.92 1.18 18 19.9 9.0 1900 R 3.02 15.0 5.07 4.03 2.69 1.80 13 26.9 10.8 191B R --- --- -- --- - --- -- - 1945 L 3.00 15.0 5.77 3.62 1.77 1.12 19 17.3 6.3 1975 R --- ---- --- - -- -- - -- - ' 1999 R 3.17 15.0 3.70 2.89 1.90 1.30 20 29.1 13.1 COMMENTS CIL SILVER BELL RD. PUNT CHS M -BLOCK, CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK CR L -LONG CR N -LONG CR M -TRANS CR M -LONG CR M -LONG CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR N -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR CIL RAHN RD L -BLOCK. CR M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CP. IRDMB CR L -TRANS CR PATCH/CULVERT L -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR CIL CLEARVIEN DR L -TRANS CR PVMT CHB I BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 88-433 (CONTINUED) DATE OF TEST IN/D/Y): 8/16188 CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 75 TEMPERATURE RANGE Ide4.F): 112-114 from: SILVER BELL ROAD ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 4.5 to: BEAU - D -RUE DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR.: 1.85 COMMENTS: MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS TEST --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AILE LOAD LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DER DEFL SUBBRADE B.E. RESTRICTION (FEET) (KIPS) I112) D2 12 13 N R -VALUE IINCRES) ITONS/AXLE) COMMENTS 2045 L 3.02 15.0 6.73 5.42 2.29 .1.36 12 19.9 6.3 M -TRANS CR 2100 R 3.01 15.0 4.50 3.34 2.14 1.44 17 25.5 11.0 N -TRANS CR 2157 L 3.08 15.0 4.15 3.00 1.87 1.24 21 25.1 11.3 11 -TRANS CR 2200 R 3.02 15.0 4.11 3.12 1.98 1.35 18 26.7 11.7 2254 L 3.05 15.0 3.81 2.75 1.76 1.28 22 26.6 12.0 2301 R 2.96 15.0 4.60 3.43 2.06 1.43 17 24.7 10.6 2348 L 3.02 15.0 5.24 3.61 2.08 1.25 18 21.0 9.4 2404 R 2.95 15.0 3.93 3.17 2.20 1.65 14 31.0 12.9 2448 L 2.97 15.0 4.97 3.35 1.99 1.27 19 21.3 9.6 M -TRANS CR 2503 R 2.97 15.0 4.53 3.33 2.20 1.52 16 25.8 11.0 2553 L 3.00 15.0 4.00 2.97 1.97 1.39 10 27.2 11.9 2610 R 3.10 15.0 4.39 3.66 2.39 1.57 15 28.9 12.1 2655 L 3.06 15.0 5.24 3.85 2.50 1.77 14 24.8 10.2 M -TRANS CR 2700 R 3.03 15.0 5.19 3.87 2.59 1.80 14 25.5 10.4 2725 R -- ------- --- - -- - - - - CIL CEDAP.VIEN DR 2735 R --- --- ---- ---- ---- --- - PVMT CHB 2750 L 3.13 15.0 3.53 2.49 1.57 1.24 25 27.0 12.6 2800 R 3.00 15.0 4.68 4.00 2.44 1.75 13 28.4 11.5 2653 L 3.05 15.0 3.40 2.7B 1.79 1.30 21 26.2 11.9 2901 R 2.96 15.0 3.43 2.82 2.05 1.55 15 33.9 14.6 2950 L 2.98 15.0 5.71 4.07 2.47 1.71 14 22.2 9.3 L -TRANS CR 3001 R 3.07 15.0 3.86 2.96 2.10 1.48 17 29.8 12.9 N -TRANS CR 3045 L 3.15 15.0 4.96 3.80 1.95 1.09 19 22.8 10.2 3105 R 3.05 15.0 3.67 2.76 2.02 1.51 17 31.0 13.5 H -SUPER 3147 L 3.05 15.0 5.99 3.99 2.19 1.37 16 19.2 8.6 N -TRANS CR 3200 R 3.06 15.0 2.42 1.81 1.43 1.17 22 38.0 18.4 H -SUPER 3254 L 2.97 15.0 3.96 2.90 2.02 1.46 18 28.0 12.1 L -SUPER 3314 R 2.98 15.0 3.41 2.27 1.40 1.10 28 24.9 12.0 H -SUPER 3351 L 3.06 15.0 3.45 2.69 2.18 1.46 16 33.8 14.7 L -SUPER 3406 R 3.10 15.0 5.06 3.71 2.27 1.53 16 24.0 10.3 R -SUPER. 3452 L 3.03 15.0 4.38 3.79 2.59 0.99 17 26.8 11.5 N -TRANS CR 3501 R 3.07 15.0 7.24 5.22 2.84 1.79 12 19.4 8.0 L -GRADE 3545 L 3.04 15.0 7.29 4.66 2.22 1.23 14 15.9 7.4 3557 L --- -- - --- -- -- - - - PVMT CHB 3596 R 3.08 15.0 8.73 6.47 2.03 1.40 11 15.4 6.8 CIL CEDARVALE DR 3646 L 3.05 15.0 3.91 2.72 1.59 1.22 24 24.6 11.4 3701 R 3.03 15.0 8.74 6.95 2.11 1.36 10 16.2 6.0 N -GRADE 3741 L 2.97 15.0 3.76 2.74 1.76 1.09 22 25.9 11.8 3754 R -- - --- --- - ____ - - - BEGIN NEN PVMT 3830 R -- --- --- -- -- _-_ __ - - CIL BEAU DE RUE DR BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION N0: 88-433 DATE OF TEST (MID/'i): 6/161BB CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 75 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deo.F): 112-114 ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 4.5 SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 j SEASDNAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.85 1,COMMENTS: MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS. from: SILVER BELL ROAD to: BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE i EFFECTIVE SUBGRADE R -VALUE O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ............. C/L SILVER BELL RD. A� FVMT CHG I 4q (L�_ �❑❑ pk Ffjj—COpp�jjFk 648 -® 'tr _ L"=�P�E'1fCE'R �., - M -BLOCK' CF: rz -� M-BLOCIL CR J LOCK CR , zT ERT eeAT��-c LL /f% C %� MM-BLOCKCR $ P6Krg1 R@Ep E.XIEW DR :45 - ---- f c100 � -®� MM TRANS CR M -TRANS CR ( 7f� _ M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CR PVMTCE28RVIEW DR a CR _®—-UF' J ��L.{{-5SUPER EE6 ADD CR -06a � E -`1C GrC TCHRFi'JALE DR '95 _ 9E8IKIDNEW FVMT 38! � - C/L BEAU DE RUE DR 4000 - - -0 - 10 20 i 40 --5 i _ -bi -- 70 80 90 100 S� BRAUN PA,VENENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CONNISSION NO: BB -433 DATE OF TEST WD/Y1: 8116/88 CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 15 TEMPERATURE RAN5E 1deg.F1: 112-114 from: SILVER BELL ROAD ASPHALT THICINES9 linchesl: 4.5 to: BEAU - D -RUE DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.85 ICONNENTS: RODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS. EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT GRANULAR THICKNESS (inches) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 �- O -1' 1 1 1 1' 1' �' �' 1' 1' 1 C/L SILVER BELL RD. E ._� PVMT CHS NSCCC - - N R N C 'to - VIP- 'CPR , M -BLOCK CR MM -BLOCK CR �# _ L/�LOCHNCRD zz! _ . CH p EFT CR I MM-LBLOCK CR pFpVKCR DR TRANSRAN tni: M -TRANS CR ` LJ SCI _ M -TRANS CR 412 _ . t34 - i�gq4— "'44 — M—TRAMS CR - 5Q M -TRANS CR R50WTCEH8RVIEW DR s;siil �E3.7 — - JU�J - pF �y -PE CR f - g54 L t ��,,4 —SUPER 9 PER Fp ADE CR �MMYCccTTpCEbRRVALE DR �jQi = PEGFNDFJEW PVMT C/L BEAU DE RUE DR 41DOO - _ 0 Ill 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 51J SI BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION N0: BB -433 DATE OF TEST (NIVY): VIVIB DAILY ESA' -'s: 75 TEMPEP.RTUF.E RANGE ideq.P : 111-114 ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 4.5 SURFACE COMITION RATING: 3.4 SEASBNAI. CUFFEMIGN FACTOR: LBS COMMENTS* MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE CITY OF EAGAN. CEADARVALE BOULEVARD TO DRY CONDITIONS. from: SILVER BELL ROAD to: BEAU—D—RUE DRIVE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AXLE LOAD (tons/axle) O 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 4 I .I : .1. .:. .:. .1. .:. .:. .i .I C/L SILVER BELL RD. PVMT CHG M—L NGSCF' t:Z ePbE'KCER M—FLOCK CR M—BLOCK{{ CR t—p! COD =s F A L UWRT M—BLOCK CR CL1r��l,EAEK-IEW DR P T CAGNFHSiGCR —T 'ANS CR M—TRANS CR M—TRANS CR M—TRANS CR PIMTCEABRVIEW DR �-ZTRM ER. CR fat C= dC _ CR _ — KA E EiLeg1TRRgC€b,R.VALE DR 4b _ MM BEGINDrJEEEW RVMT 3830 — C/L BEAU DE RUE DR _. F F KIT�T-T--T-Tw-T�--- --- — -I F I I I _ 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1P 20 1 DATA TABULATIONS AND PLATS The data tabulations consist of a heading section which contains information relevant to the section tested. The name of the section tested and information regarding its location is in the upper right of each page. The left part of the heading contains the date tested, the estimated Daily Equivalent 18,000 pound single axle loadings (ESALs) that are applied to the pavement, temperature of the asphalt mat at approximately one inch below the surface at the time of test, thickness of all the bound asphalt layers, a Structural Rating Number, A Seasonal Correction Factor, and a line for comments relevant to the section or the analysis. The Structural Rating Number is determined by the Road Rater operator and is based on the following scale: 5 new pavement (no cracks) 4 unconnected linear cracking 3 large block pattern cracking 2 alligator cracking 1 potholes and loss of surfacing The Seasonal Correction Factor is used to calculate the deflection that is expected to occur during the spring thaw period. The tabulations contain ten numeric columns and one comment column. These are described as follows: TEST LOCATIONS: A reference used to locate the position of the test point, usually in distance from the beginning of the section. FORCE: The amount of dynamic load applied to the pavement. It is listed in kips. One kip equals 1000 pounds. FREQ: The number of load pulses applied each second. DEFL '#1..#4: These four columns contain the measured deflection at each test point in mils. One mil is equal to 0.001 inch. EFFECTIVE SUBGRADE R -VALUE: The effective strength of the subgrade soil as calculated from the resilient modulus which is based on the deflections. It is expressed as an Effective R -value based on the back calculated resilient modulus of the subgrade soil. EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALENT (EGE): This is the granular equivalent thickness that is needed to match the overall pavement deflection. DEFLECTION TESTING USING THE ROAD RATER The Model 2000 Road Rater is a trailer mounted device which uses an electrohydraulic force generating mechanism that is capable of applying a vibratory load of variable force and frequency to the pavement. The Road Rater generates the load force by hydraulically oscillating a 2000 pound lead mass up and down. The force generated is proportional to the amplitude of the oscillation. This applied force is measured electronically by three load cells attached to the load plate. The dynamic load generated follows a sinusoidal wave form and its amplitude and frequency are varied to suit the pavement Iand analysis procedure. During the loading, the pavement deflections are measured at four ' locations on the pavement by seismic geophones. One geophone is located at the center of the load area, and the other three ' geophones are located at 12, 24 and 36 inches from the center of the load plate. The four geophones measure the deflections simultaneously, resulting in .a measurement of the shape of the deflection basin. With the use of elastic layer analysis, the strength of the individual layers of a pavement can be determined from the deflection basin shape characteristics. The weaker a pavement structure is with respect to the subgrade, the steeper the deflection basin will be. The deflection values inversely represent the strength of the specific area tested. This testing method is sensitive to the pavement temperature and to the time of year. However, factors have been developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to adjust the deflections to represent a springtime deflection of a pavement with a mat temperature of 80 degrees F. The testing is performed at a selected spacing to form a statistical sample of the pavement strength. Variation in pavement strength does occur between test points. Traffic volume, pavement thickness and subgrade soil type information also is required to determine the allowable spring axle loads for the pavement segment. If at any time they are.found to be different, the allowable spring axle load should be recalculated. The deflection tests provide extremely valuable information for setting spring axle load limits and for design purposes. The magnitude of the deflections will remain relatively constant throughout the life of a pavement and will begin increasing only when pavement distress develops. There are indications, however, that the shape of the deflection basin will change within the normal life of a pavement. Pavement condition, during its normal life, should be rated by its roughness or rideability and the surface condition. The surface condition of the pavement in the vicinity of each test point is recorded at the time of the test, but the roughness must be measured separately. AXLE LOAD RESTRICTION: This column contains the recommended axle load restriction that would result in a spring deflection equal to the deflection that would result from the design section. The design section is determined from the design procedure described in the "AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures -198618. COMMENTS: This column contains the Road Rater operator's comments regarding the pavement in the vicinity of each test point or location information. A profile plot of the AXLE LOAD RESTRICTION is also produced if the test location references are distances. Plots are usually j not produced if the tests are from large paved surfaces such as parking lots. Plots are also produced for the Effective Subgrade R -Value and EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALENT thickness if called for in the analysis. The plots are proportionally scaled for both axis so that the information can be quickly reviewed to determine locations where changes occur. PRa'�"T 4 b I AAATzAws CASK Sc�islen YayeronA»oclatee. Inc. _ _ _inµntira.alar.yet.. aPlannarn_ _ 9/19/88 aao r.. r............. • afa�W n 0.0 • W-ar Droning Title LOCATION MAP CEDARVALE BOULEVARD EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. F Sheet no. I EXISTING EGGS 6 ,SIT. i UK NEW BITA o ¢411'7r6, EMO EXISTING G� Bath 8618 riTa EXISTING osis lop EN �JY4-�'aY4'dlY Drawing Title Comm. No. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 4212 2A7/Rama"" a Me` npNn0ne` O MINNESOTA UnI`� 6M 1161161201a A�r 8.Nl SSWII�O EAGAN, 1. CE& ro1'4[E R.B.O d TREET IMPROVEMENTS 6eperna KmmmnaPle"Is " EAGAN, MINNESOTA /7/891 ad r..�,enrn.....r 0 r�....r.ua m eau a euamaer 4212 w urown tsy. R.B.C. Date: 2/7/89 CRIYIr13 a F e Z 9 ;a 3 f 9 I mitMalea ISTREET IMPROVEMENTS llAssociates, aysroa ! I.C. CEDARVALE BOULEVARD MmmpM & "W 0 ""°.U&M M4 "—EAGAN, MINNESOTA Ip••yl• Mare Werplla Yl 0/1L'&N-Wlltl Comm. No. 421,2 REMOVE & REPLACE •r MC• 7 f I 40 0 a pS aft l / � R B , C 8ehelen � A".Ysysronoocletss, & 1 inpv";;8 9nr�q°n o Plnm°n Ns&.Wa A• w 0 04n o Drawing Title Comm. No. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 4212 EAGAN, MINNESOTA I 2D n (� i a •••.•�-..•��••�• E`dCdVlWIV1VlE201`d SE jOjDMY B jaLO�OY . �.000Y V"oalo .iou ! r"6 a -CEDvgnv E BonFE/�VI�-D--zussf Nac xMajou 21BEE1 IWbL5.OAEINEV i2 1515 pLOMu Ba: Dtoriva lips goww' Ho' rot vw i ps r i a roe *w l � r� � - .o'T' �• O1'T boy wo 1 00 ►`� b LO YCY: ` •SIS T � i. - "S•9. r►' ci.% .. Hca .ra �re•�M e �•11 ,ro p. 00-04 cc coo am /7/8 Drawing Title Comm. No. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 4212 0 W nLaglw• lansyors ®Pasoan iE AG AN., .M I N N E S O T Aft"wrtu •vw� Or�e1LLb WV O OtiOiOW 1 2 2F )rawn By: W. K N. SAW—CUT BIT.& REMOVE INC.B 0-6I8 ODNC. Ch %— 22' REMOVE BIT. DITCH B C,M.R W#xC -RIES I 1 .2331 BINDER COURSE {I —1/2'*23.41 MODIFIED WEAR COURSE PAVING FABRIC AND TACK EXISTING PAVEMENT (VARIES) REBUILD SHOULDER WITH 3/4"MINUS FILL _EXISTING DITCH 100-16 CRUSHED AS; REQUIRED. TYPICAL SECTION FROM NICHOLS ROAD TO 700`'NORTH PARIES 5d-60 8of 141 46 12� 8� ;# 2.331 LEVELING COURSE AS RI 1-1/2"#234.1 MODIFIED WEAR COURSE PAVING FABRIC AND TACK EXISTING PAVEMENT SAW -CUT 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS REPLACE AS,REQUIRED. TYPICAL SECTION FROM SILVER BELL ROAD TO ABOVE llayeronmit d Anoethtes,, In c. rl ,Drawing Title CEDARVALE BOULEVARD 4212 e/Is/Be 7...,..m.,.. A'm.:..u.;.»p..0 eey„_.�_=-owl EAGAN9 M.INNESOIA l 4 No. W.K.N. Date: 9/19/1 12' 12' 12' 12' Drawing Title CEDARVALE, BOULEVARD `-�m••(�• •Mn B Rr"Yer• B IO)1•Ysvtl.r•. a.sa(oEAGAN, MINNESOTA ;omm. No. 4212 Sheet no. 3 01 -o+ N A► vocl 4 � O� co �Sb P Jia �,•� ,P � e W. G A� Y . •: r A. N J U Z ALL NOTED PROPERTIES ARE WITHIN NEI/4, SI9, T27, R23 Drawn 3y Drawing Title Comm. No. D.J.H. Orr ASSESSABLE PROPERTY 4212.00 Yeyeron 6 Date- - Associates, Inc. CEDARVALE_ .BOULEVARD Sheet -no: - NOV. Basin«n • sunefen • Plan"" 1988 Man 11M Sees'"' "eeee 0 ereNwr.o nen . w•mae 'O EAGAN. MINNESOTA § Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOT is, BLOCK 1, CBATTERTON PONDS B. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement (Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds) --In response to a petition submitted by the property owner of the above referenced lot, Council authorized a public hearing to be held on March 7th to discuss this issue. Enclosed on page (&I_ is a copy of the legal description and related area proposed to be vacated. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this petition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of the drainage and utility easement as described (Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Pond). f lJ IVI H IV 1-1 7 208.00 589.43'16'E %-I 1 e CAAVWW Ov rLa c. v CROPS . \w y/ w LOT • E 1; 1�z3o `.�pN Description of drainage and utility easement to be vacated: 911 that part of the drainage and utility easement over Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 15, thence South 67 15' 00" West a distance of 35.00 feet to the point of beginning, thence Borth 18 59' 52" West a distance of 101.22 feet, thence South 60 171 07" West a distance of 114.26 feet and there terminating, excepting the southwesterly and southeasterly 10.00 feet thereof measured at right angles to Chatterton Road and Chatterton Court. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting VACATE A PORTION OF STREET C. Vacate a Portion of Street Right-of-way (Heritage Lane - North of Yankee Doodle Road) --On February 7th, the Council received the staff request to vacate this abandoned right-of-way and scheduled aublic hearing to be held on March 7, 1989. Enclosed on page is a legal description and location map showing the portion o the Heritage Lane right-of-way proposed to be vacated. All notices have been published in a legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies. Comments have been received regarding the necessity to retain a utility easement over this description due to the existing utilities within this area. However, the public right-of-way no longer needs to be retained due to the relocation of Heritage Lane lining up with Blue Cross Road to the west. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of Heritage Lane as described and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N pO+ MW ~°► m Off' W 103 » e ta 10M m a ° Err0 g C snct Cr C a C.a ass°' Cr Ct a r Lot 16, Block I Was Addition DESIGN D4-12 HOUSE C9G R/W = — 4 r LOT I VINCENT J. K#NNEDY NST. LIMITS IEMOVE PAVEMENT AS — IIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER HOUSE TO BE r == _�— REMOVED fly HOUSE L_ ---j RaAD BEGIN RETAININGWALL I +33, . . . 1� so o ao 10C scale teat - Existing Drisesay LOT 2 ROY F. & MARGIE L. OTIS Portion of Neritege Lane Proposed To Be Vacated HOUSE AR., I-S•F END RETAINING WALL STA. 14+95, 49 LT. F.F END RETAINING WALL STATA. 14+a6 , 4g�RT. FF Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AWARD/LEXINGTON AVE - RESERVOIR A. Contract 88-24, Consideration of Contract Award (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) --Ever since the bids were originally received for consideration of contract award in September of 1988, this item has been continued periodically pending the resolution of the property acquisition from HUD. In January of this year, consideration of contract award was further continued until March 7 with concurrence from the low bidder (Brown Tank Minneapolis of Eagan) subject to consideration of a change order with contract award providing for a contract bid adjustment to accommodate price increases that have occurred during the 6 - months delay -of contract award consideration. The City Attorney's office has been working progressively with HUD to close on the property in accordance with Council action of February 21. However, it is questionable whether a title insurance issue can be resolved by March 7 which would allow us to award this contract. Further delays in consideration of contract award will result in the inability to complete this facility during 1989 and will require to be out of service during the late spring of 1990 which could affect our water service availability. The City Attorney will provide an update with a recommendation for Council consideration at the meeting on March 7. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award/cancel Contract 88-24 (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) and if awarded, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. V1 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING B. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to Allow Billboard Advertising Sign in an LI District --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their January 24 , 1989, meeting to consider an application by Naegele Outdoor Advertising requesting a conditional use permit to allow a 40' tall "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S&W Industrial Acres. The APC is recommending denial. At the request of the applicant, the item was continued from the February 7 to February 21 meeting. Another letter was received, a copy is enclosed on page, requested further continuance to the March 7 City Council meeting. For a copy of the staff report, refer to pages? 3 through �. For a copy of the agtion taken by h APC, refer to those minutes enclosed on pages d 3 throughFor a copy of the City Attorney's findings relating to bill oard advertising signs, refer to pages VS through P (� . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 -foot tall, "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S&W Industrial Acres. NAEGELE Naegele Outdoor Advertising. Inc. of the Twin Cities February 17, 1989 Mr. Vic Ellison Mayor City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Mayor Eillison and Members of the City Council: We respectfully request a continuance of Naegele Outdoor Advertising's application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a billboard advertising sign on Light Industiral District Lot 2, Block 1 of the S & W Industrial Acres addition, along Highway 13 in the SW 1/4 of Section 19, from the City Council meeting agenda of February 21, 1989 to the next Council hearing scheduled for March 7, 1989. The purpose of this continuance is an effort on the part of the land owner of the above noted parcel, to resolve the outstanding financial obligations and assessments due the City as noted in the Planning Staff's report of December 15, 1988. We have been advised by the land owner that he will be meeting with Mr. Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance, regarding the assessments due and hopes to resolve this matter at that time. Please direct your staff to contact me should this request for a change in venue prove problematic. Sincer p Y\00-� Arthur R. Dean Real Estate Services ARD/bkw CC: Mr. Jim Sturm City Planner Karen Finnegan Clerk 1700 West 78th Street • Minneapolis. MN 55423.612/869-1900 7apnet 612-869-3897 ra :: DM W #Ili#W OU&TECTv . CORDITIOMML OBE PZMIT APPLICANTS MAMMA OUTDOOR AWMATIBI00. XMC LOCATION: LOT 2. RLO= 1. B i • ZMDUBTRIAL eCRas y XXISTING EONIDGS LI 114M SMOVOIS AL) DATE OF PUBLIC MEMIRING s ROCMK= 22. A988 - JANUARY =24 r 4909 DATE OF REPORT: DRCMNJ= 15. 1988 (RBVISRD REPORTED BY: PLAIRIIRG AND MEGIHEERING DXPARTN�S APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 40' -tall, 'V' -shaped billboard advertising sign on lot 2, block 1, S i W Industrial Acres. This lot is located between Highway 13 and the frontage road that serves E -Z Mini Storage to the north. Currently, lot 2 is vacant. if and When that lot develops, that business would not be allowed a business sign if the billboard is approved. Comdescribes a 'business sign' as any sign upon which there is any name, designation, or advertising Which has as its purpose business, professional or commercial advertising and which is related directly to the use of the premises upon Which the sign is located. The signage area measures 10.5' s 36', totaling 378 square feet. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 2. The closest portion of the sign to the property line shall be 10 feet. 3. No business sign shall be permitted an lot 2 if this advertising sign is approved. 4. This development shall fulfill its past outstanding financial obligations as identified in the staff's report. A-fw=r- �7 2 FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: In researching the Einancial Jkistorical records for th s parcel, ^it was determined that this property has fulfilled its financial -Abligatioms relating to trunk area sanitary sewer, lateral benefit from trunk nater slain, lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer &nd *.runk #Lrea storm sewer (but only a portion of the property). It Las been Discovered .*.bat this property has inadvertently Leen omitted iron fulfilling its financial obligations relating :to..tb! following ite"' ITEM FHOJ = = jWp Trunk Area Water 232 $1,115/ac 6.65 ac $ 8,008 Water Availability 232 - 2,015/ac 6.85 ac 13,803 Charge (WAC) Trunk Area Storm Sewer (Remaining Area) 186 0.083/of 68,271 of (1.57 ac) 5,666 TOTAL OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL OBLIGATION $28,477 If it is required that this outstanding financial obligation is made as a condition of approval for the petitioned Conditional Use Permit, the final financial obligation should be calculated in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final approval. ap :--.-.-to a specif Ic.1parcal 49' -assessment history Im per assessment* of record. z relating to -the fiUmbici- for Council consideratSis IM Water Trunk Water Availability Charge Storm Sewer Trunk TOTAL PROPOSED _-Vl#ZlSj&C -.4-0S 4PC _4 9*008 '0034fa6-- _':AAS ac 23,803 .4043,/Sf 48#271 of .-I.,5*666 FINRNCM OBLIGATION 428,477 to ,�,b »s • ' W INDUSTRIAL �•v ...� !r.••+n' .... •ny,. r./! lY!' WAl• r0l. Ar Ikl, .15.4 , do u,r.. r ..� • ' LCT I'� r;► j� i 'e! t,�. 010 ��,��,�a�� • .:�►, J � • .+fir ° _ � � t for` ,• i, r �, a r z @ \ �r oe ., . f Y•`. n l . y I M .' r it. c I r� • � .,'Y,. ,�,` � � a.. �' .i''. it � f �' • • � � a ��•� 4� ��' - . �y� 'V',� • % � �' . �lr1r "'. rp fwrr. w M.r.y � 4 w 1% j 1 ��• rr.w .�� /A tl , jlmmm�m C.O;WF*X hiviro WE WAAGN W�A M: 6" It Y/ M .y 1 wy000, led R.- �� .i F. IIY t � •`.., ,i. +r1 4x- . To tIT a w• MLR . F 9 it � F •��: P'� 1i f 1• Co p. i1 ,� S � s. ' as•i� I F 6 so -if s ` o u.lA 2 -M"%40 WA'TrI: 11Vr11A%%L%T%j C0.$5 %!Cars .��. •.C. �.. 1 '11a A. r M •y �. plrM owe'. Ca d, As 4 .r all n• ' Y s r �,� I X54 �4r � yy �f� � �'� • k n��. k .Se � II �'�'' �• •. � r.� /, �i 'i �' E, ,..� �• a L:•.y .. / silo io�� I t >a •' • I• STof'M SEwEC TRv.wti - QZ.ab % of 16.VS Ac*Es r: �'� 1 4( 'IX #� � 11 �;• .. i'uti:•� ''1': .h i�;t�� F. it00 2 rr ✓.v Aa ti �' N ♦ r`� r , ; • `� R r •��•'` 1�' �.y��Ug Y`' �4,� J ^ w'lt • .. I'S 1�ii.�� Of u'• ' � r/ . s •:r9G• ,fib �L1 I r a' � d d ' •2p1 ,.:r r r1' 'l�.i 'i•��i':: M t7 s. Y.s 4•� . �' ,� v l• s 'i, , '.a �' G 1 •: lyI -•: �j•'1tit7 ��'9R.. ll. n .,5 r 1 � ��• , i VVV • �1 _1.. 1' / ` �,giyr• . � ' Isis �\ ,1 � " �� ,�' rYa t'�.• �!•'�� r .i . r. , �' , .I..n. ••�• 4' �Ty +�'``r 1 5�y_ � , �yy%1' \• ,. ' .' K �l T•• �.Jq, ••M It 4 '• �!• ad rn Y S j. 1 1 •� !� � , r. l 7� y ,I��y 4 & J.. it ,� �, 1 t �1 , \ h� 1\ I I � .IrJ. ,,. •: •' " � T a! gyryp.� ..if :�. F p}pp�,(�([ a ,,' � .//� , h�-sb;' , � :al��_•` �o ;: `)_ ;;. �•� iii _ -cull • rin ILM el V Mf'�%+.1dd!'eK 9�' •InI 4•/w✓:rel ... +4N'=1'.W.4•.fl}�•ehplrl.sq�l:• �.,, 'Y.:1111A rte:. r. a if - as ye.. j [ �- X50- _� )S ��K•.. .r:-SF ' � •tib.: i . 7 -_ ._ ..��_.' : wv0i7/1t.�A •. (nww I\ 4 •i IT > y�•�• � Ls MSO 3.0rrr 1, I sj° op t14 .'n .rf.,• ;.:� �. i• L� .�i f_ '.. 46 6/7&0 C GSl fIMSUBjECT PARCEL — ¢• '.l - �i 1` 'YDS •IS Nt"^ + _ - rC►p YY a}� 1 4AJ .�v�C-ls .� �j:`ti.yT [ V 1 T` IG 03 city of eagan:11NATER ,�„�: starwara PUBLIC - - WORKS MASTER 'PLAN DEPAR i_ MINI' STORAGE Advisory Panning :aaaissim Mty of Eagan 3830 Piot Snob Road -- ' pagan, M 55122 `. ._. Dear :omission ?femberess This will acknowledge receipt of your notice of a second Putlic Hearing on Thursday, December 229 1988relative to the application of Naegele Outdoor Advertizing to erect a billboard on Lot 2, Plock 1 in the S and til Industrial acres along highway #23s Again, this notice cases as somewhat of a ,surprise and certainly as a dira,ppointmert in light of all the part sign denials. Not more than a year ago or so we discussed the.possibility of a small business identification situ along new highs y 513 an the back of cis prcject now that the traffic has been permanently diverted off old highway 813, and weretrefuseds We were told at the time to conform with the ordinance which places a real hardship on our ability to advertise our onsite tudaess. Vie accepted that decision and are trying to live with its The thought that the My would now entertain an enormous billloard leads us to 4pestion that deeisdme I also understand that like 1694 and 3358 which the'MKy is trying to control that it was their intention to oontrel the Dsdirsffi #`13 area as well. = .. ,T In light of the above we Ippon _the 31kelihood.that a billboard sign would now be eonaldered m the propel tg nwt�dosaa 46'ass Unfortunately, I the"' be with ip famnr' Ton the aristmar Rw4aay in another Stats, but let this Uttar eoae�y ale rasgest objection. Very truly yam's, ;. es Page 2/EAGAN AWIMT 3 The following lop 1. Developers Teak -Vorce --.Scott IOastlaY bpd. Ab, 2. SpecialAsaessaeat3gl�'s ski -1hert,mu'iscai o'de s Tom IMMMI IN NOW and times. _ — Item C under old nosiness (coventsy Pass — troatter companies) and Items E i F under Now Business (Ordinance Amendment — Subdivision Platting Requirements and Ordinance Amendment—jftblic Design of Street and Utility Improvements) were continued.to.thq January 26, 1989, Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Trygg moved, Nerkley seconded, the action to approve the agenca as amended. All voted in favor. December 22. 1982. Member Graves requested a change on page 4, paragraph 1, the first sentence should read •Be stated that the total volume of issues were too great to take any action at that time.• voracek moved, Trygg seconded, the notion to approve the December 22, 19881 Advisory Planning Commission minutes as amended. All voted in favor. At this point, Chairman Pawlenty explained the Advisory Planning Commission procedures to the Commission and the public. .. Chairman Pawlenty opened the Yirst public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow a billboard advertising sign in a Light Industrial district on Lot 2, Kock 1, 6 a N Industrial Acres, along Sigbway 13 in the southwest quarter d Seat%a 19. City Planner Stora summarized tbe�"testion er.the' Commission. Arthur Dean, representative.Zor Informed the Council that conditional use permits for billboard advertising signs had been allowed in the post. -Me further stated they had alerted the adjacent property owners and mmogele feels the request is within the ordinance. There was no public ccaent. m s ?age 3/ZAGAN'MwISORy ,74nuary,24,..Am' member graves %m Storm stated about Six regarding the past sly pounds for the asnial.. Outlined the sign X402 of a pylon sign aaa as 'mea-ber t_ �ti.... PrIel a. _ 10 kol riia _ nasties r .ia he mit the sign exceeded the squareootaicarat.< Member Vorecek gnestiossd�t tore #odao .,��yy^ia -. expressway if it was within the Wiscretioa of "thd•CoaaolL -11r.-Sturm stated yes. Mr. Voracok questioned the number -at billboards presently In Eagan. Mr. Sturm showed their locations. Mr.-Vorkley asked if there were any freeway standards regarding billboards. 4W,-41tarm stated no. - Chairman Pawlenty stated he felt billboards were bad aesthetics and that the size exceeded code. ye felt the City sbotad restrict billbarard requirements even further. member Hiller.stated he felt the code should be changed to allow applicants to know the rules. Graves moved, Markley seconded, the motion to close the public bearing and deny the application for a conditional use permit to allow a billboard advertising sign in a Light Industrial district on Lot 21 Block 1, e a V Industrial Acres, along Highway 13 in the southwest quarter of Section l9, as submitted by Haegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. All voted in favor. TWA COMM 100 722 ADDITION — IHDHmai, LAND COMM Chairman Pawlenty opened the "next .ppunblic hearing regarding the application for a preliminary plat coasistia�g of two lots and an outlet on 19.5 Limited Business zoned acres withjnSown Centre 100 Planned Development located south of .11own Centre Drive and north Of O'Leary Lake in the northeast quarter of Section 15. City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the apgtication Charles Bortholdi (Federal %and Company) showed the location of the proposed plat to theOommissioa. Am szplaiped the two abases of the project and the square footage# B"I sad pcoperty:HoainQ. Be stated the plat met City requirements. Be further slated there were other representatives from Federal Land _00pany available for questions. Tom Bolger, 3528 widgeon Lane, had concerns regarding the drainage to the lake and the -view of the buildings from his property. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch explained the drainage for the project. Member Voracek questioned the building elevation and asked if there were any vents on the toof. sr. Sturm stated there was no �A/illl.r` J J '_ v �. M E M 0 R A A D D M TO: Jim Sheldon FROM: Joe Earley DATE: February 13, 1989 RE: Municipal Authority to Regulate Billboards Our File No.: 206-5316 (OOE) Jim: The City of Eagan is currently examining its authority to regulate off-site advertising in general and billboards in particular. Since this would involve the regulation of commercial speech, the constitutional test that must be met is as follows: 1. The regulation must directly advance a significant government interest; 2. It must be a legitimate time, place and manner restriction; 3. The regulation should be content neutral; and 4. Ample open alternative channels of communication should remain. I have found three cases in Minnesota that further explain these constitutional requirements. The first is Arcadia Development Corn. v. City of Bloomington, 125 N.W.2d 846 (1964). In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's finding that Bloomington's denial of a permit was arbitrary and capricious. Their reasoning was that the Council gave absolutely no reason for the denial. The Supreme Court further went on to say 0... The City can unquestionably regulate, even stringently, the use, size and position of business signs and advertising billboards but the regulations as applied must still bear a reasonable relation to the purposes they are meant to attain." Id. at 851. The second case is Naeggle Outdoor Adv. Co. v. Village of Minnetonka, 162 N.W.2d 206 (1968). In this case, Minnetonka passed a zoning ordinance prohibiting billboards in residential districts and ordering the removal of all non -conforming billboards. The Court examined two issues. The first, whether a municipality has the power to prohibit by zoning ordinance the use of land in residential districts for billboard advertising and secondly, if the City could require the removal of pre-existing billboards. The Court held that the zoning ordinance was constitutional and stated 'If the challenged MA 1 restriction is reasonably related to promoting the general welfare of the community or any other legitimate police power objective, the fact that aesthetic considerations were a significant factor in motivating its adoption cannot justify holding it unconstitutional." Id. at 212. Minnetonka was also allowed to demand the removal of pre-existing billboards but this was due to the type of lease that Naegele utilized. The Court seemed to say that depending on the terms of the lease or agreement with the owner of the property on which the billboard was located, the City may have to proceed by eminent domain against existing billboards. The third and most recent case is City of Cottage Grove v. Ott, 395 N.w.2d 111, (Minn. App. 1986). Cottage Grove passed an ordinance prohibiting placement of all off -premises advertising signs and defined them as follows: "A free-standing sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service or entertainment not exclusively related to the premises where such a sign is located or to which it is affixed." This definition is very similar to Eagan's ordinance definition of "advertising signs". (Section 4.20(c)(2)). Cottage Grove did continue to allow on -premises signs. The Court of Appeals ruled that the City may prohibit commercial speech expressed on billboards based upon its interest in traffic safety and aesthetics and that Cottage Grove's ordinance was a permissible regulation of commercial speech and did not reach protected non-commercial speech. 0. at 114, 115. In discussing the constitutionality of the Cottage Grove ordinance, the Appeals Court cited the controlling case regarding the regulation of commercial speech expressed through or in the nature of billboards as Metromedia. Inc. v. City of San Diego, 453 U.S. 490, 101 S. Ct. 2882 (1981). In Metromedia, the San Diego ordinance prohibited off -premises signs containing commercial messages while allowing on -premises signs. The Court found such regulation permissible and stated "If the City has a sufficient basis for believing that billboards are traffic hazards and are unattractive, then obviously the most direct and perhaps the only effective approach to solving the problems they create is to prohibit them." Metromedia at 508, 101 S. Ct. at 2893. It should be noted that the Eagan City Code classifies advertising signs as a conditional use. Courts have found that where erection of a billboard requires obtaining a permit as a conditional use, the grant or denial of the permit may not be based upon a subjective evaluation that the sign would be aestheticly objectionable but must instead be grounded upon compliance or non-compliance with objective starrdards enumerated in the zoning ordinance. Mcouillin Mun, COLD., Section 24.382, (3rd Ed.). JPE/djk V (O Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PARR CENTER ADDITION C. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Park Center Addition/ Federal Land Company, Changing the Land Designation for D -III to CPD, a Rezoning from AG to a PD District and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 6 Lots and a Conditional Use Permit for Pylon Signs --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting held on November 22, 1988 to consider a comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III of approximately 21.3 acres to CPD, rezoning from AG to PD, a preliminary plat of 6 lots and a conditional use permit for pylon signs located along the north side of Cliff Road. The APC considered the applications as submitted by Federal Land Company and recommended a denial of the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning as stated. There was no action by the APC relative to the preliminary plat or conditional use permits. The City Council at its December 20, 1988 meeting, continued this item until the February 7 meeting allowing staff an opportunity to perform a more in depth transportation study with its consulting transportation engineer, SEH, and representatives of the Dakota County Highway Department. For a copy of the transportation analysis, refer to a memo prepared ky the Director of Public Works enclosed on pages�" through _J00. At the February 7 City Council meeting this item was presented by the developer, however, at the recommendation of the City staff this item was continued to allow further review of the proposed plat. The City has identified the western portion of this property as its first choice for a future senior housing project. The Director of Community Development has further addressed the issue and for his remarks, refer to pages _LQL\_ through �Z For a copy of the original staff report on Park Center Addition, refer to pages through I �3 At the December 1, 1988 APRC meeting a recommendation was made regarding the Park Center Addition. For a copy of that report and commission action, refer to pages j3� through 3L. There are five (5) recommendations listed under commission action as a part of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission report. For Council information, item one which had three alternatives is the recommendation of the commission that the elderly housing proposal is the most preferred use of the land in terms of compatibility with the existing Rahn Park. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting Also enclosed on pagesd through 1411 is a memorandum from Westwood Professional Se ices that attempts to clarify several issues that were discussed by the APC at their public hearing on November 22. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITER: To approve or deny 1) a comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III to CPD, 2) rezoning from AG to Planned Development, 3) preliminary plat and 4) condi- tional use permit for pylon signs. E MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 SUBJECT: PARK CENTER ADDITION, PRELIMINARY PLAT CONCERNS REGARDING CLIFF ROAD UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS At the February 7 Council meeting, consideration of the above - referenced preliminary plat was continued until March 7 to allow additional review pertaining to transportation impacts associated with this development as it relates to Cliff Road. Also at that meeting, the Council approved the access study report performed by our consulting traffic engineer (SEH). Attached to this memo is a copy of the letter forwarding this report to the County requesting similar adoption as well as consideration of accelerating the anticipated upgrading of Cliff Road into the current 5 -year CIP. Recent discussions with the County indicate that this issue will be reviewed by their Plat Commission on March 13 along with any revised preliminary plat for Park Center. Preliminary discussions with the County Highway staff indicate that if the development is to occur in accordance with an approved preliminary plat which requires a major full access on the western end opposite the Driver's Training Facility, the developer would have to assume responsibility of all modifications to Cliff Road necessary to accommodate this access. These may incorporate appropriate left-turn/bypass lanes, signalization, etc., similar to the intersection upgrade of Cliff Lake Drive. It has been explained to the developer that the City and County would be reluctant to provide any financial participation for any temporary modifications to Cliff Road necessary to accommodate this full access with a proposal to pursue the ultimate upgrading of Cliff Road in the foreseeable future. We will continue to aggressively pursue a process necessary to expedite the major Cliff Road improvement. If you need additional information, please let me know. Respectively submitted, omas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Attachment cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Jim Sturm, City Planner Dale Runkle, Director of Community Development Glenn VanWormer, Consulting Traffic Engineer (SEH) u \ r*7� 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454 -SM February 21, 1989 McRt MDp 140M OS ELAN DMD K. G SEMSON PAMRA MCCREA N EGDDREwACHMI HgMAS H3*ES MR DAVE EVERDS RIVE E VAN OVBIIIEEKE APPLE VALLEY COMMONS CRY 0"k 7300 W 147TH ST SUITE 402 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 Re: CSAH 32 (Cliff Road) Access Study - Scheduling of Roadway Improvements (5 Yr. CIP) Dear Dave: Recently, the County and City jointly participated in an access study to be performed for that section of Cliff Road from I -35E to TH 77 (Cedar Freeway). The information from that report was presented to our City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of February 7, 1989, in consideration of the proposed Park Center development located on the north side of Cliff Road west of Cliff Lake Drive (opposite of Western County Court Facilities). This access study was unanimously endorsed by the City Council and is being forwarded to your attention for similar review and adoption by Dakota County so that it can be referred to by all development applications along this segment. In addition, while this segment of Cliff Road has always been recognized for its potential future roadway improvement requirements, it has not officially been included in the County's 5 -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). With the inquiries and applications that the City is presently receiving, it is anticipated that the related traffic projections included in the most recently completed Comprehensive Traffic Forecasting Plan for Dakota County and the City of Eagan indicate that this segment of Cliff Road will have to be upgraded in the next 1-3 years. Preliminary discussions indicate a potential for three lanes in each direction with proper channelization and signalization at major intersections in accordance with the previously referenced access study report. THE LONE OAK TREE --- THE SYMWX OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR OOMWMITV "a MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1989 SUBJECT: PARK CENTER PRELIMINARY PLAT AMENDMENT TO STAFF REPORT (NOVEMBER 15, 1988) RESULTS OF ACCESS/TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION At the November Planning Commission meeting, the above -referenced proposed preliminary plat was considered based on information submitted and a staff report prepared evaluating the proposal. Subsequent to that application being considered by the Council, additional information was also requested pertaining to a study for driveway/street access onto Cliff Road and the traffic impact of this development on the Cliff Road corridor. Each of these issues is addressed in this memo as follows: STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT As a part of the Engineering Division's review of this proposal, a detailed analysis was done on the water quality and quantity runoff from this development. While the original submittals indicated that approximately 3.5 acres of the northeast corner of the proposed Park Center Addition would be directly tributary to Pond AP -25 within the Cliff Lake Center Addition, staff indicated that there was additional capacity available to accommodate more direct surface runoff. Subsequently, continued analysis of this situation indicates that it would be better to have the majority of the Park Center development discharge its surface water runoff into Pond AP -50 located adjacent to the west boundary of the Park Center development. Approximately 3.5 acres of direct surface runoff from Park Center could still discharge into the Cliff Lake Galleria pond (AP -25) but it should be minimized as much as practical. Therefore, this memo constitutes an amendment to the previous staff's report for consideration of this application. CLIFF ROAD ACCESS/TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION During the review of the preliminary plat by the Dakota County Plat Commission, concerns were expressed regarding the proposed full access on the west end and the limited right -turn only access approximately mid -point for this development. They had recommended that an access study be performed for Cliff Road between I -35E and the Cedar Freeway. This study was completed by the City and County's joint traffic consultant, Glenn Van Wormer. An executive summary of that study and the analysis is attached to this memo. Also, the traffic engineer's review of the original application material creates some concerns regarding the traffic generation c;;[y DALE C RUNKLE PAGE 2 from this site. These traffic volume concerns were a result of confusion over the size of the retail facility. After receiving the corrected information regarding the proper size of the development, those original concerns have been alleviated. In summary, the proposed development will not generate any traffic problems that cannot be handled by the proposed accesses to Cliff Road or Cliff Lake Drive subject to the anticipated upgrading of Cliff Road from 35-E to the Cedar Freeway. It is anticipated that Cliff Road will probably be upgraded to a 6 -lane roadway with channelization and signalization at critical intersections in the future. The timing will be depended upon the proposed development schedule of Park Cliff and other properties within the travel shed. The best projections indicate that the need for this Cliff Road improvement would be within the next 2-4 years. With the proposed full access and limited right-in/right-out from Park Center, certain concerns are raised regarding the ability to handle the anticipated turning movements from Cliff Road to the full access interchange at the westerly end of the Park Center development as well as ensuring that the limited access is restricted to right turns only. This may necessitate the upgrading of Cliff Road prior to allowing the connection of these proposed accesses. INTERNAL CIRCULATION The traffic consultant and myself have had several meetings with the developer's traffic engineer regarding the internal circulation and site plan layout. Because the proposed users have not been selected yet, the detailed design of the site plan and related circulation cannot be refined to a level of detail necessary to address all concerns. Therefore, it is more appropriate at this time to evaluate the impact of the overall development and ability of the adjacent transportation system to handle the proposed traffic volumes and to leave the internal circulation and site plan review as a part of the building permit process. As a whole, the concept layout is workable subject to minor modifications that can be addressed with the site plan review during the building permit process. SUMMARY In summary, Condition #13 of the previous staff report should be revised to reflect the potential change based on the final grading and drainage plan for this development. The revision proposed is as follows: DALE C RUNKLE PAGE 3 This development is required to provide approximately 4-6 acre feet of wet pond storage volume below the proposed normal water level for Pond AP -50. This development shall comply with all requirements of the County Highway Department pertaining to the proposed accesses to Cliff Road. If any additional information or further clarification regarding these issues would be helpful, please let me know. n 11�{{K�//�� irector of Public Works TAC/ jj cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Attachment EXECUTIVE 'SUMMARY CLIFF ROAD ACCESS STUDY JANUARY 12, 1989 Prepared) for-' City of; Eagan 0 SHORT=ELIIOTT-HENDRICICSUN; INC- Executive Summary Background Information Cliff Road currently carries a relatively high volume of traffic which is anticipated to increase rapidly with the proposed development now taking place. Currently a raised median is in place between Nicola Road and Cliff Drive. A second median is in place from I 35E to the west terminating east of Rahn Road. A painted left turn lane exists in both directions at Rahn Road. Access from the north is limited to Cliff Drive, Scott Trail, and two proposed entrances from the proposed Park Center. These entrances have not yet been approved by Dakota County. Several access points exist on the south side. A joint driveway to the Flour Bin Restaurant and Rocky Rococo operates as a right turn only driveway near Nicola Road. A radio station driveway exists just east of the end of the median near Cliff Drive. The driver testing range has full access at its driveway. There is also a driveway to the Auto Mall between Rahn Road and I 35E. This is "restricted" to right turns in and right turns out although outbound left turn violations are noticeable. The County guidelines for spacing of access locations and median openings indicate the potential for one median opening between Rahn Road and Nicola Road. Any change would require a variance. Operational Analysis As part of the study, development along Cliff Road was reviewed and traffic generation for each business was determined. The traffic anticipated was then placed onto the street system and turning movements constructed at each of the access points onto Cliff Road. As an example, there are approximately 95 eastbound left turns to Cliff Drive and 75 left turns out of Cliff Drive in the evening peak hour. This was done for existing buildings and for the proposed Park Center development. //I Once the volumes and distributions were complete, three different concepts were studied in detail and other concepts were reviewed in less detail. The three major concepts considered were a single median opening and full access at Scott Trail, a full access at the proposed Park Center west driveway and full accesses at both the Park Center proposed west entrance and Cliff Drive. For each option studied, the impact of diverting traffic onto adjacent intersections was considered along with the inconvenience to individual motorists. If a single access point is provided at Scott Trail, all traffic associated with eastbound Cliff Road and the proposed Park Center would be forced to utilize the Rahn Road intersection and the access from Park Center onto Cliff Lake Drive. The volumes are heavy enough to create operational problems on Cliff Lake Drive in terms of northbound left turn lane storage and may result in outbound Park Center traffic delays. The concept would also force the Cliff Drive traffic to utilize one of three routes to access eastbound Cliff Road: 1) Cliff Drive to Nicola Road, 2) cut thru the shopping center and access Nicola Drive next to the Tom Thumb store, or 3) make a right turn from Cliff Drive to Cliff Road and a u -turn at Nicola Road. While diverting traffic (option 1) from Cliff Drive to Nicola Road will operate satisfactorily, we believe the other two options would be more heavily utilized and thus could create congestion on Nicola Road at the Tom Thumb entrance or operational problems within the two shopping areas. Placing a single median opening at the proposed Park Center entrance would create similar operating problems for the Cliff Lake Drive traffic. The only change is that Scott Trail traffic would now likely cut thru the shopping center west of Scott Trail to reach Cliff Drive and access to Nicola Road. U-turns at Nicola Road would probably be increased. Traffic on Scott Trail thru the residential area to the north would also increase. The concept of a double median opening with one median opening at Cliff Drive and the second at the proposed Park Center entrance would alleviate many of the operational problems. The traffic primarily effected would be that on Scott Trail. Commercial traffic may be rerouted to the north thru the residential area or may cut thru a shopping center to the west or make a u -turn at the Cliff Drive median opening. With the close proximity of the median opening, tine anticipated much of the traffic would divert to either u -turns or cutting thru the adjacent center. However, residential traffic originating in the north Scott Trail area would probably use the alternate route to Nicole Road reducing the traffic volume on Scott Trail at Cliff Road. Access from properties to the south would be better served by the two median openings. The access to the radio station could continue as is because of the small volume or could be relocated to line up with Cliff Drive if the property owners wish to do this. It would be desirable to relocate because of the potential for westbound traffic to attempt to make an illegal left turn into the radio station driveway by traveling a short distance the wrong way. Implementation Implementation of the proposed recommendation is dependent upon approval from the City of Eagan and Dakota County. Extension of the median from the end of the current median near 35E to Rahn Road is desirable to provide better direction to motorists at Rahn Road and to prevent illegal left turns from the existing Auto Mall driveway. The development of the Park Center proposal would also make it desirable to extend the median along the Park Center frontage past the easterly driveway to Cliff Road, if the driveway is approved. Left turn lane development at the proposed Park Center would also be desirable and installation of a median would define the area. Full medians should be in place prior to any development on the south side. It therefore appears desirable to install medians concurrently with the development of the proposed Park Center site. The median extension west from I 35E to Rahn Road can be constructed earlier as part of the widening and channelization on Rahn Road south of Cliff Road in conjunction with the Rahn -Cliff development. Ultimately Cliff Road will need to be widened to three lanes in each direction. A design decision should be made relative to timing of the major improvement and installation of the turn lanes. It may be desirable to attempt to install permanent center turn lanes and medians with ultimate widening on the outside. However this may be a difficult design depending upon existing road surface and base considerations and drainage considerations. The ultimate widening of Cliff Road is also very dependent upon widening of the bridge at 135E and the potential need for widening the bridges over Cedar Avenue. It is recommended that the City adopt the concept of a raised median between Cedar Avenue and I 35E with openings at Nicola Road, Cliff Drive, the westerly proposed Park Center driveway and Rahn Road. This concept can be submitted to Dakota County and if they concur, implementation details can be further considered. 7 r T =S EN ENGINEERS ■ APCNItECFS /PLANNERS UA C Cgkf - N5 LEGEND MEDIAN OPENING LOCATION - ,OAD ACCESS STUDY 88077 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADRMSTRATOR ROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY �✓ DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1989 RE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 CITY COUNCIL PACKET INFORMATION ITEM E - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT - PARK CENTER Staff has been working with the Dakota County Housing Authority regarding preparation of a site layout. On the seven acres, we are showing approximately an 80 -unit three story apartment with underground parking for 40 vehicles. There is some room for expansion if the additional one acre parcel to the east is purchased. The question arises as to the setback required from the retail to the residential. It would be staff's suggestion that the retail building setback be moved further east if the City acquires this additional one acre parcel. City staff has met with Mr. Erkkila of Westwood Planning to review tree surveys and revised landscape plans. The tree survey included all trees over 6" in size and some revised plans have been drawn to save as many trees as possible. This is a detailed item and if, in fact, the Council elects to rezone the property, this detail can then be worked out as to the best site plan which will mitigate the grading and impacts on park property to the north. In reviewing the timing for acquisition of property for the HRA, I have contacted Mr. Mark Ulfers. The time frame to acquire the property is as follows: The City received the funds to acquire a senior housing site in April 1988. It is my understanding the City has through April 1990 to acquire this elderly senior site, leaving a little over a year before funds would be forfeited or problems arise with acquisition of this site. From time of acquisition, the City then has approximately two years before construction or housing should begin. This step of the process has not even been thought of as to the type of construction that will occur; this will begin upon site acquisition. Hopefully, this updates you on the timing and scheduling for the Park Center senior site. Enclosed is a schematic indicating how a building could fit on this site, knowing we have capabilities of placing an 80 -unit facility on this site with possible expansion if the City elects to acquire or meet with the senior housing committee, or City Council committee, to begin the site design process. If you desire additional information, please feel free to contact me. DCR/js l�� N U CAM CETAIL - Ul'li Ut hAIfAN SUBJECTS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, RE- ZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PARK CENTER ADDITION) APPLICANTs FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONINGS AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS NOVEMBER 22, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 15, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted to the City for the Park Center Addition, an office/retail complex consisting of approximately 175,000 square feet. The first application is a request to rezone 21.25 acres of AG (Agricultural) land to a Planned Development district. The second application is for a Preliminary Plat consisting of six lots to be developed in one phase. The Conditional Use Permit application is for pylon signage only. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area D -III, Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre); therefore, an Amendment will be necessary. This proposal is located north of Cliff Road and west of Cliff Lake Drive. PROJECT SCOPE: The northwest 6-10 acres of this site is currently being appraised by the Dakota County HRA for an elderly housing project. With that in mind, the applicant has placed office buildings and a clinic in that area. If this site is chosen and developed for the elderly housing complex, only that portion of the project would change. The elderly housing would probably initially begin with 60 units and increase to potentially 120 units. The following is a detailed breakdown of each lot. Specific users have not been identified at this time: Lot 1 .99 acres 4,500 sq.ft. Class 1 (sit down) restaurant Lot 2 9.8 acres 133,000 sq. ft. retail strip center Lot 3 1.1 acres 6,500 sq. ft. clinic Lot 4 .95 acres 6,000 sq. ft. retail bldg. Lot 5 .93 acres 4,800 sq. ft. bank Lot 6 7.5 acres 2 - two story 18,000 sq. ft. office bldgs (36,000 sq. ft.), a portion of a City storm pond. 44 ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, this site consists primarily of open grassland, generally falling to the northwest. Mature oaks are found along the northern property line and near the pond on the western portion of the site. If the proposed grading on the north side of the pond was changed and some retaining walls were used, some of -these oaks could be saved. They would be a nice amenity for either the office buildings or an elderly housing area. Site sensitive grading along the northern property line is necessary in order to preserve the landscape buffer to Rahn Park abutting to the north. Other adjacent uses are ,two office buildings and three single family homes to the west, Cliff Lake Center to the east, the Dakota County Court Facility, and Drivers Testing Facility on the south. SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: Two major access points serve this site - one that was constructed with the Cliff Lake Road improvements and the other opposite the entrance to the Drivers Training Facility. A third right in/right out near the center of the site is proposed. The loop from the access on the west to the right in/richt out would be a dedicated City street serving the office/elderly areas and three other lots. Six hundred sixty four parking stalls are shown on the site plan. The office area would require 202 stalls and 69 are shown with a proof of oarXing area for 54 more. The retail strip center shows 443 stalls and Code requires 698 spaces. The four smaller uses meet their parking requirements. The entire project provides 725 (plus or minus) spaces and Code requires 1,047 (plus or minus) spaces. This is a lot by lot breakdown: LOT STALLS PROVIDED STALLS REQUIRED 1 43 43 2 443 698 3 45 45 4 44 40 5 27 19 6 (office) 123 (including 202 Tn proof area) I'm NOTE: The elderly housing area would require one stall enclosed and one exterior stall for each unit. Since architectural plans have not been submitted, each free standing building should be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and Council before the issuance of building permits. The overall lot coverage is approximately 19%, and 30% would be permitted in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district on a gross basis. All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements in this Preliminary Plat proposal. ENVIRONMENTALS/FIRE i POLICE: An EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) will not be necessary and staff is currently in the process of determining if their governmental permits are necessary. The Fire 6 police Departments are aware of these plans and staff has not received any specific comments regarding major unresolved issues. The detailed review would occur with the typical platting and building permit procedures. PARR CONCERNS/SITE AESTHETICS: The parks department has also expressed that the trees by the pond and northern property line are valuable both on and off site. Every attempt to save as many as possible should be demonstrated through careful grading plan preparation and in the field marking. The overall landscaping plan works well conceptually, however more screening of the back of the strip center from the park will be necessary. An overall sign agreement would eliminate any further undue Variances and provide a more uniform development. This has been working well with the Town Centre development. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan submitted as a part of this application impacts virtually 95% of the existing topography on this site. When taking into consideration the additional parking areas as identified along the northwesterly property line, the grading virtually impacts 998 of the proposed site. The proposed grading plan shows cut areas of 10' - 12'+/- in the southeasterly area of the site, in the southcentral portion of the site and in the southwesterly portion of this site. Fill areas ranging from 4' - 5'+/- in the center of this site, 14' +/- northerly of the proposed retail center and areas of 20'+/- along the easterly side of the proposed ponding area in the southwest corner of the site are proposed. Along the westerly boundary of the development, the City recently constructed the outlet to Pond AP -50 under Project 452. Pond AP - 50 is a aesignated ponding area in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Stora Sewer Plan. The grading plan proposes to add additional material on top of the existing 15" outlet to Pond AP - 50. The existing outlet pipe is not of sufficient strength class to handle the additional fill which the development proposes to deposit on top of it. .he details of the proposed storm sewer system within the parking lot areas and the street were not reviewed at this time but generally appears adequate. The general drainage areas as designated to Pond AP -50 and Pond AP -25 (ponding area adjacent to Cliff Lake development) are acceptable. Both ponding areas are designated in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan to receive runoff from the proposed development. The grading plan as proposed requires the replacement of approximately 150' of 15" Class 5 RCP with 150' of a 4,000 D Load Class 15" RCP. The development is responsible for the replacement of the existing Class 5 RCP with 4000 D Load Class RCP or modifying the grading plan to provide a maximum of 22' of cover from the invert of the existing RCP to the finished grade for the outlet to Pond AP -50. The main water resource issue for this site is the impact of the development on the downstream water quality. As previously mentioned, 10.15 acres of the site will drain directly to Pond AP -25 and 11.1 acres will drain into the proposed Pond AP -50. Water flowing into Pond AP -50 is then routed to Pond AP -49 (which is in Rahn Park) and from there flows into the outflow from Pond AP -25. The Eagan Park Department has re nested that Pond AP -49 be classified as a Type 3 Wildlife Aesthetic waterbody. Historical data indicates that Pond AP-49,presently meets desired water quality standards for a Type 3 waterbody. Maintaining predevelopment phosphorous runoff to Pond AP -49, therefore, will prevent degradation of the existing water quality in the downstream waterbodies. Development of the Park Center site will increase phosphorous runoff by approximately 42 po ear. The model estimates• that predevelopment phospho ff to Pond AP -49 can be 4r )c„ -n maintained by constructing a wet pond volume of approximately 4 acre feet in Pond AP -50. In addition, phosphorus loadings to Pond AP -49 can be further reduced by designing the ponding areas proposed south of Cliff Road to act as nutrient detention basins also. An incom_olets erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this preliminary plat application. An erosion and sediment control plan, reviewed and approved by City staff, is required before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval addressing the following additional concerns: 1. A temporary berm is recommended behind the retail center to prevent drainage from going over the proposed 2:1 fill slope. 2. The 2:1 slope as proposed is required to be a maximum slope of 3:1 with a 4:1 slope preferred. 3. Tie retaining wall proposed by Pond AP -50 is required to be a: least l' above the 100 year high water level. All slopes are required not to exceed 3:1 around the ponding area. 4. Specifications for seeding and mulching the site should be included in the plan. We recommend that all disturbed areas be seeded and mulched within two weeks after rough grading. 5. Tse site map should identify all ingress and egress points for the site. A rock construction entrance pad will be necessary at ingress and egress points to minimize tracking of mud by vehicles onto the existing paved surfaces. 6. Silt curtains must be properly installed before any land disturbance occurs. 7. The revegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction must be addressed in the erosion and sediment control plan. S. Maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures should be included in the erosion and sediment control plan. 9. The company/individual responsible for maintaining and removing all erosion and sediment control practices should be included in the plan. 10. storm sewer inlet filters will be needed around the catch basins. 11. All storm sewers outletting into waterbodies should be adequately protected to prevent scouring from occuring at the outlet. 12. Identify on the plan where topsoil will be stockpiled. Stockpile can be strategically stockpiled to prevent sediment from entering wetlands and adjacent property. 13. A site narrative should be IrAgLded on the plan which shows schedule for rough grading, installing utilities, revegetating the site, building construction, curb and gutter, and blacktopping. These schedules impact erosion and sediment control requirements. UTILITIES: Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficient capacity and depth to serve this site is readily available along Cliff Road and Cliff Lake Road. Sanitary sewer lateral extensions and individual service lines are adequately proposed to service the proposed development. The details of the proposed lateral extensions were not reviewed at this time, but generally conform to City standards. slatermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily available from the existing trunk water main in Cliff Road and has been stubbed to the easterly property line of the development as a r.art of the Cliff Lake Centre development. The development is proposing an internal utility system (water and sanitary sewer) which would provide service to all proposed platted oarcels. Details of the proposed internal utility system and how it connects to the existing City system is subject to detail review at the time of the final plat. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access has been provided to :he site along its easterly boundary with the Cliff Lake Centre development. As far as the proposed accesses to Cliff Road are concerned, the County has taken a stand that they will not approve any access points along Cliff Road until a detailed traffic impact study is done for the entire Cliff Road area. Comments concerning the Cliff Road access points and the proposed internal public street will be deferred until a detailed traffic study is done along Cliff Road. (See attached letter.) Although the site plans are preliminary, the following concerns are identified relating to internal traffic circulation: 1. Driving aisles in the parking areas are required to be a minimum of 24' wide. 2. Entrances from public right-of-way and internal roadways are required to be 30' wide minimum. 3. The clinic parking lot area has no turn around area at its northerly end. 4. Minimum curb radius for the entrances are required to be 25'. 5. Except for the retail center, the other proposed site development areas are unclear as to identifying areas for delivery vehicles and trash pick up circulation. 6. There should be two lanes of approach to the drive-in bank which allows access to the south parking lot and areas for stacking. 7. The office building/clinic and bank/retail entrances should be combined. 3. The additional parking shown north of the retail center will be difficult to build (existing topo is approximately 28' lower than the proposed retail center parking lot grades). 9. A minimum 80' right-of-way is needed for a divided roadway type entrance as proposed. The site plan reviewed by the City's traffic consultant included approximately 46,500 square feet of additional shopping center/retail development more than the 86,600 square feet acknowledged in the applicant's traffic analysis. As a result, the traffic volume forecast provided by the applicant is substantially less than the traffic volume projections identified by the City's traffic consultant. In summary, the major concern with the site is access to Cliff Road. :without the access point/points identified, further comments relating to the site plan configuration of streets and -3a.-king areas and traffic projection revisions are premature. EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Sufficient right-of-way for C11;4. Lake Road was provided with the development of the Cliff Lake Centre. The requirements for right-of-way along CLiff Road are subject to requirements as identified in a detailed traffic study for Cliff Road which has been requested by the County. A ponding easement will be required for Pond AP -50 to accommodate storage volume and high water elevations as identified in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. All internal utility easements will be required for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main facilities servicing multiple properties and those which provide continuity to the City's trunk facility system. The development is required to acquire all regulatory agency permits in the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. PUBLIC STREET/UTILITY FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City special assessment records show the following pending assessments of record. PROJ 4 DESCRIPTION RATE QTY 529 Lateral Benefit Trunk $21.60/ff 640 Water Main 452 Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 705,790 T`%' "^ING ASSESSMENT OF RECORD �0 AMT $13,825 39,52- $53,348 The following financial obligations are identified in accordance with present City policies for the applicant's information and Council consideration: DESCRIPTION RATE Stora Sewer Trunk* $ .027/sf Nater Availability Charge 2,015/ac Lateral Benefit Trunk 21.60/ff Water Main pq'y AMT x49,801 $22,945 19.51 39,313 1,131.34 24,437 Cliff Lake Road (Street) 63.65/ff 668.62 42,558 Cliff Road (Street) 111.70/ff 1,257.72 140,487 Cliff Road (Trailway) 13.00/ff 1,257.72 16,350 TOTAL PROPOSED FINANCIAL OBLIGATION $286,090 * Rate identified is difference between existing zoning rate and proposed zoning rate. All final financial obligations will be calculated based on the Simensions as shown on the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. /J1 ) DAKOTA COUNTY SURVEY DEPARTMENT -300 WEST 1471n STREET Thomas Colbert, Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: PARK CENTER Dear Mr. Colbert: GARY H. STEVENSON, R.LS. COUYTV SURVEYOP 1612• .331.1153 APPLE VALLEY. MINNESOTA 551, November 3, 1988 The Dakota County Plat Commission met on October 31, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat of PARK CENTER. Said plat is adiacent to C.S.A.H. NO. 32 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. This development will have significant impacts on C.S.A.H. NO. 32 and the adjacent driveways 'and city streets. This section of C.S.A.H. NO. 32 is not in the 5 year CIP, however, preliminary traffic studies indicate that the road will have to be built in the future as a 6 lane divided highway. County right of way guidelines for a 6 land divided highway require 100 feet of half right of way. The two access drives proposed do not meet the County spacing guidelines for the existing road. The Plat Commission would agree that this site could need access onto C.S.A.H. NO. 32. Due to the frontage length and proximity to existing streets, it may be desirous for access to be provided by development of a city street. For a divided highway, such as should probably be considered by the County and City for this segment, the County Plat Commission would recommend a full access to a public street at 1/4 mile spacing (near the west end of the property) and a right in—right out access to a public street at 1/8 mile spacing. This prospect would have ramifications on'the access allowed at Scott Trail and Cliff Drive. It also seems appropriate to review the existing driveways on the south side of Cliff Road with respect to development of a future public street and the location of median openings. The Plat Commission believes that the City and County at this time should evaluate these issues in conjunction with approval of the proposed development. The Plat Commission proposes to jointly participate in a study of this segment to develop a project to reconstruct this roadway. If recommendation from a study can be approved by both the City and County,. the Plat Commission will recommend approval of a plat consistent with those recommendations. Sincerely yoLu—rs�, Gary H. Stevenson Peter Sorenson Dakota County Surveyor Traffic Engineer Plat Commission Secretary cC`ale Rnnklo- v R1annor Gary J. Erickson, Physical Development Director David Everds, County Engineer Martin Colon .GHS:vf A PARK CENTER ADDITION CONDITIONS 1. These Standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, 32, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, G1 2. A planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a time specified by the City Council. 3. A 9etermination for the elderly housing site shall be made either on this site or on another location. 4. A Pylon Sign agreement shall be entered into. S. Zach_ot shall be reviewed in detail by the APC and City Council before building permits are issued. 5. No :ooftoo mechanical equipment shall be visible from the public streets. 7. Tae :arcing along the east end of the strip center shall be :smovad. 9. Special emphasis will be placed on screening rear side of =;12 strip center from Rahn Part. 9. :r:;33 easements shall be provided for the Parking lot. 10. All 'trash shall be contained within the buildings or in enclosures attached to the building and constructed of the same naterials. Il. 5erming shall be provided along the public streets. 12. ;he development is responsible for the replacement of the existing Class 5 RCP with 4,000 D Load Class RCP or modifying the grading plan to provide a maximum of 22' of cover from the invert of the existing RCP to the finish grade for the outlet to the Pond AP -50. 13. The development is required to provide 4.0 acre feet of wet pond storage volume below the proposed normal water level for Pond AP -50. o+j D 4U �, � ��/C�(�irj44j X71 •Nb \ � (�{Jp 1,7E I"iaP��, ��~ D -III CPDJA-9- 1010appi LB " l��F L ........... Preliminary Plot of PARK CENTER SOCHI U441R1.TIM, AH alt e! the pith 741.41 feel e! the eeet".et !wrtee e! ane tectheeet hares, of Neuer 11. T n," 7'. an'*, it. Dalen :caner, ft "seta. I.a" "rib of the beau% 46.14 feet sh4ffa•. ts.Lr: that bent of the eewheast D,Nrter of ane sa.th4ut r,artar of lactase 14. Toaa.lt 1'. Mn.. 71. Dakota cc.nte. -„ragas. described A. !elle+.: Lbnre.el" at 24. go'.nun Monte at Said Southeast "a9t4r: 0~4 "rah 4 ,-1006 1' rt..tes 71 ,ccn,A Lata. eeaur,ee boar,"• glen. she Sett I,'- -! Said Sbethea,t :.unar. a dntMol of ".ben fent! thenal Lout`. t/ d""as !4 r:n,t,a 49 *are"$ Yet. ear.1111 elan lee SOn, I.no of said /Oitheaal 7esrttf Of the sCOt"ast a d,sS... a Of I).i: feet -e Us .halal point Of "e,nnlna: ge.n.e ear.zhve aaisn ee d"me St rm.te. as seem", ne.t� a glsta•.c. a! :!.]e fast: in#," wrap 1 sear... Ia -mata'. a alterca went, a maatane. if !.4! tett: :ra"f 4ee:4 , dfaref. L! .•el t4 aeC.d, Last. a d,rts.ed m! 1:4.:1 lent: :Y•:* ?art'. :: degrees 7! a,eites 1 seemed Last. a dl.tmM e! :let • he l.tse.eetle: ,lt" . :,.f a..11r. \g[S• ge:rffs !tn,tea Il arenas tial !ler •Ag: •r.: •a: it.... et:tr a,Srass 1''l,a Jte, :, 1*cVt.s ..gS. a g:aga'.g, of !49.91 feel to thl .etmal maInt Of O.a:hrl.e. SAD :n.. - a O! :.it" a. cLlr! L&KI :LT1.L. &.M.d:t. to Me ::r: !:;@ -c a! regard I" i" e!!Ive a! t" :e,nll SOMIdel. :aw:a --.rel. 4:Sr*a.t.. :nn..eitasrl.' of .n. !al!dialed eena¢»g I&",,[:Hann, as a .,.t an ere ben It" e! u.- _ _ m ir:a! E. "in^ 84.44 'M: tera! in. SOYtn WSL Merge t,. 1t.:]beer ..,tar at Metlan 19. ;..hit Il. Una. 71: .neree + ::r. a9 eevren. !a r:niee, " Attend, C.". ase, -:•v tea .n: aM of oetiot / ban Saar' ! !.4"41 : •Inu:o 7: saccmz. 'est. on the lased!:% a.tf",Cr. e! t•.a neon 1!+e a treat :*Carded :r ane. aa. {!:111. a a .... no, O! :7'._ 1 !eat to deo .pearl. final of S, It. of ::,!I Le.* 'bel and teat, tar.."sma. ;:naueaM 975.444 ,.ft. 1:.751,: @oren [.alt+" Semna • A Utae.lual dinner S gMS41m"r laeera YM :Office' :Hien Office 11 *n!, i]721 7.••. 4esn,"tan Dr.,, L.4an, n. !1171 'h8l'LhTIM M t•LAi -MC[L <. s Safe {:5] :Irr.'I. Nle S[T hAte AMR Lha7.Ldr T1Cf4:T y Lot 1. Bleck 1 41.111 4C•ft.+rA"14 be. L.n. 14. Nie. 71: 4e. 11 Int 7. Black 1 424.430 m.ft./9.141/5 at Lee 1. Allen 1 88.111 an.fa./1.11441 me. ' I Lea A. lieu : 711.931 aw.!t. 9.tlp4 re. p.he! .d.!S.:.S1ee. me. :Ba./a6 N•!a./t.7ee8S ie. Lee A. Diego 1 41.181 a.f.ft.I4,e41I/ a'. ' ..... ._... 'a _Mt 1. C.U. 1 4'.481 r,.!t. 1.17916 4e ' �• Vag a:. 14.1v •+!!. :.11"N at. m hada -- ---- ! :ala./ 47!.604 .n.!, 7:•15171 me. 1'.]41 s1•!:.!l.fH/e en. 111."4 a1.4t.14.7291S be. . �..it ! ...a. .. r ul.,..... ♦ rte . 1 /� •......... . • �, • lOFeMA!'E LAID SL'RVEYlN6 e« I NJI M.V81 wee 41 48..ninona a"•'1 \\ ? SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS •« „• NV Jill I� � w f •-.. ��CIQ.1� ��.r�f�� f•0 _•w1�11�� :: •'R•: JOti �f. ]L,..:L_ �� ww„_�wM •� �.•�.«r �.� .r PARK CENTER 1 nN.r .�w Imo•: iw:-.w�.. w.... •M..I-•.• �.-.�� ww. •y N. ,�w •...www , w w f 1! " , i M+ 1�nuiixiai 11 h'III! ill i._i_cail uui:r_ 7/ Y,//,, en ..n iorE PLAN ^ 1 ;'�; _�;,'. j i'� � � � �� -�•• `ii%� �� l�� f��-�• rte.-..� ;,. . � :•� ;art "� �—.� � � i ; \ `` �-�` '/'-•_• i , j / 1 ,�14 1Ile Ire ii i •• �' '• ;\`war /� ,: I } I I I I �� \\ .r `\ISI 1 ; I I I , 1 - r:'«'S .....\ • 1� I •w \�� 1 �, �` (\ I I I 1 L �' ' LII I � :�_.. �Y�n RL•Tr�lr. 'm01 •�� = Pua ��Lb r,•awl..rr nal .� PARK CENTER 7 ~-�" �•— �..ri�"N..� 1•rlwlr�� _ ..r �.�NN...... •w� �.�r r�-rr� N�.�rr w _ _ r.. -w ��'•rw�rr�. auYA UNu w.run 4n•I�M•1 N•. W rlrr. MN. Y• • may± •�• . W N. W W r�•rr. • IY IA• WrwW I. 1.. =w N" W • • • QLZ-•.I �r-4•.Y.«_ V� w .. .. al!a!at C _._. .. _.—.� .. .�., _.- MEET a or a ■Ilcen • • +� • CLIFF ROAD - 1257.72 F Fr it I tl,l� It l I I I' Ilil t• l tltt. aI�ptll:l l I S I jI l to I'll ;I 1 11 �l ili i 0 S . _HAS llq S:Uf'i U65FJ D(IOj s� 1 •� . :JL Ir p : t I Ilk � I � p : t I Ilk r IC}iF pW01, .0 wl a.�w• w .ow m..�� 1! A u =jt 1to idll7 i 1 _ lis l G 1 H ! till 1;; rj) t =W i W t t VJ t•• l'iSf 1' ll4tl to to ci • LL 1 � His s jet' w • �- ^ C!) cr jr=f I!'E =� J �Q m all Q 1 I }_` Ji o J a Q > O Q ir sr ItL W LL I.- 7j J Q • (:�t1 Div I' iil ilii I��I dj1'] 4�•a �T• i1i41\� '\1 �'l� �i.l•'hl':,• $ �A • �jj-.i r '� �� NLN 1i 1 1 I I i 's!f m M i.1LL LL u: z r ui W U m Cvo Pii IL ill m Y {rlj�j O Q sllt°! 1'- �1 1•• ' iicr i}s w w rn ffI O ri iil+ W ii i \A-V ._. 7E' I FLA 96.} �AP-35 �� r 6-s :7C i AP 1: i1_ i.. ;i :'_� >• i I ;jj/rjF10.0 _� ` \•' .�i` L:_ BP- A-� ^y/iii•%;'• 3 !% E2ed X1 PiQ • /i 1 .r. '-AF A"'"22 AF=22'L_,_�Ag -- 87 I 8736 I �9e r . as I9 ZA-ao_ BB2.0.7-903.1-j-' - -!- :; \4 ,r. -7.10.B 0 nMrc AP-261 -'• �i I'+! '. t.Erf eg. .BPV Ix -oma• \ ,> q F:4',I .lo AgPg•23A't:•LAf AP°49 900//1 1-5:— 991.7 `rye \! r i; 'P-4D t 7S E:Q� / 12.91 `. 889.2 8947 l� • --pp ;�?• tir: -25 rrr LL ••:8BB.3 �p P-42 ' BP�`L2•. • Y:.88$. ::•1'; / 9gS.G �� p.a 0. ._8R4i++x /. (-964.0 _ b BP31— � s �T:339.0g - �— AP-1 / �/� i II tZ7.. •'%�1 _ �' `, 912.1 �14 'BP 32, 919.! 93.9 �,,� \ i. C 4 -44 A- f 1 93— � / 7 ' :-SY• � , • Jr1 t4Y .G 918:ST 91 0 s.q �l^ _ L9-t'r!�� e '-7E AP �• AP=16 yrs. 't r.. �; • =920.0:. _ P3.5 is.',•. AP :4 .'r 'N •r_ ^ � V \ ..✓..:926.0- _ AP'IS'• .. :9 4. -i�; LP_A%` _`',_•908.8'-�'i�% �sg�/ 913:D '�'.\ AP-30 t.-913.0.: ==�: 19/4.8 SUBJECT PARCEL FIGO 1 city of eaganSTORM SEWER approved: standard. plate %: PUBLIC JMt-JF WORKS MASTER PLAN DE PARTME l�� SUBJECT PARCEL 4 N FIG#3 city of ea WATER �pfO1°� ciatev: PUBLIC woAKs MASTER PLAN iftoftoib naPA12'Mtc a r4 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CONSULTANTS 7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE SURE 1191 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 553441 (612)914.7590 November 4. 1988 REFERTOFILE: 85-34-03 N E M 6 R A N D U M t TO: --.Mr. Martin Colon, Federal Land Company FROM: James A. Benshoof�4 RE: „Traffic Study for Proposed Park Center Development PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to document the results of our traffic study for your proposed Park Center development. which 'is located in the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Cliff Lake Road. As requested by City staff# the two prime purposes of this traffic study have been: To develop and present forecasts for the traffic that 'Will be generated by this development ..to assess whether the public roadway system will be 6ble to adequately accommodate the development traffic TRAFFIC FORECASTS The first step in the traffic forecasting process is to quantify the types and amount of land use In the development. As we understand, the prime development component will be a shopping center with about 86.600 sq. ft. The plan also provides five additional development parcels. We understand that prime candidates for four of the parcels are restaurant. retail. bank and clin1C: The plan indicates that the fifth parcel would have an office use, though it is possible that the parcel baby be devel6bed instead with senior housing. The spbcIfIc sizes of developments on these five pared 19 have riot yet been determined. From a traffic forecasting standO9iht. our approach has been to assume that each of thes^6rcels wlil.be developed to about the maximum density allowild under City Code parking provisions. An outcome of . this Assumption is that the sizes of several uses as utill:bd for traffic forecasting purposes are larger than iIIusfr-ated in the development site plan. Spec ifIca11y. for traff(t forecasting purposes. it has been assumed that the develbment will.consist of the following componentsb_ F t' Mr. Martin Colon -2- Skipping Center - 86.600 sq. ft. R69taurant - 4x000 sq. ft. R6ta11 _ 6.000 sq. ft. 8ahk - 4#500 sq: ft.. WICe _ 36.000 bq. ft. CI'.hIc - 7#000 sqo ft. it should be noted that trip generation November 4; 1988 for the overall developrfipnt likely will be lower if senior housing is developer) instead of the office component. The next'`step is to apply appropriate trip generation characttfistics to these development statistics In order to project.;the number of new vehicle trips that the development will add' -to the roadway system. These trip generation projections were developed for the p.m. peak hour* the busiest 'traffic perltod on the adjacent roadways, through the followilig three-step processs 1) Apply expected trip generation ratesl to each development component in order to predict the p.m. Peak hour volumes in and out of each individual Component. 2) Apply a five percent reduction factor to the sum of the values from step 1) in order to estimate the P.M. peak hour volume in and out of the entire development. The reduction factor is to account for tPips between two uses In the development which would Iitbt utilize either Cliff Road or Cliff Lake Road. 3) dategorize the trip generation result from step 2) into pass by trips and new trips. The document thtitled "Trip Generation." published by the ITistltute of Transportation Engineers indicates that if major phenomenon of new shopping centers is that a 31gM ficent portion of their traffic is pose by %flps, trips that already are on adjacent roadways �hd that will be intercepted to include a stop at the 666 shopping center. based on the size of this �opping centers Ftgure V-1 in the "Trip Generati on" "epoet Indicates that at least 40 percent of the Shopping center trips wilt be pass by trips. The �IremaIning 60 percent of -the external shopping center.. I ps bre O*pebted to be hew trips that ate hot;' now .!-. raveling on adjacent -roadways. ThrougFhe above process, the trip generation projections shown 1 ='Table 1 have been developed. A major result;; itt -,.,yam Table 1 i s that, the -ant 1 re Park Center dove 1 opmeht.g (s'. `.+F('h. = ' r.r: .'. Trip d"eratloh hates u Wished In "Trip GeneratTbn," instttute o1` ^^ F^^+neers, 1138 y Mr. Martlh Colon -3- November 4, 1988 14 TABLE I TRIP GENERATION FOR PARK CENTER (P.M. PEAK HOUR) is Rates Trim Use Size (ft.2) �_ ait Shopping tenter 86,600 3.05 3.18 264 275 Restaurant 49000 10.6 9.3 42 37 Retail 6,000 9.2 9.6 55 58 Bank 4,500 13.4 13.9 60. 63 Office 36,000 0.4 1.8 14 65 Clinic - 7.000 1.0 2.6 _7 _1B Totals-z` 144,100 442 516 5% fht.ernal trip reduction -22 --6 Totfi1 net external trips 420 490 'r Pat .1 by Trips (40x) (364 total trips) 168 196 New. `'.Trips (60x) (546 total trips) 252 294 Mr. Martin Colon -4- November 4, 1988 projected trip generation Is 27 percent less than the 750 trips that were assumed to be generated by this property to the C11#f Lake Galleria Traffic Study conducted for the City. The next step Is to project the directional distribution of the devOlopment trips. The trip distribution percentages presented In the Cliff Lake Galleria Traffic Study were utilized'as an initial source of distribution for new trips generat0d by this development. Those trip distribution percentAges were adjusted slightly to account for the expectations that this development, due to more local claracter, will attract a greater portion of trips from the west and., north. The resultant expected distribution of DRA trips to/from this development is as follows: to/from north on Cliff Lake Road - 25% to/ from east on Cliff Road - 50% to/from west on Cliff Road - 25% The past by trips are expected to have a different directiohal distribution pattern. Based on the relationship of the d6veIopment to major traffic streams, the estimated distributions of pass by trips is as follows: from east on Cliff Rd. to west on Cilff Rd. - 30% from west on Cliff Rd. to north on C11ff Lake Rd. - 20% from north on Cliff Lake Rd. to west on Cliff Rd. - 207E froth west on Cliff Rd. to east on Cliff Rd. - 15% from north on Cliff Lake Rd. to east on Cliff Rd. - 15% The next/ step is to apply the preceding trip generation results bnd trip distribution percentages for.new and pass by trip$': in conjunction with expected usage by driveway, to develop p.m. peak hour development traffic forecasts. The resultaht forecasts are presented In Figure 1: As.indlcated in Figute i, pass by trips actually have the effect of reducfnd'particular through volumes. is IMPLICAtIONS OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ON ROADWAY SYSTEM Relating to the p.m. peak hour volume projections shown in Figure ii the implications of development traffic at key locatipl will be discussed next. . i. ersectlon of site access drive and Cliff Lake Road. The design plans for Cliff Lake Road accounted for "C11ffN:Lake Galleria Traffic Study," prepared for City.of Eagan bj�� Short-Elliott-Hendrlckson, Inc., October 1987: page 16 / i IIi1 Y i.1 •� l► izs �.+ t-138'1 L 13 x-20 --zl X113 116 6� -53 Cliff Road J' Drivers` License Exam Facility'. Notes Reductlons In certain through volumes are due to pass by N (intercepted) trips Not to Scale `' F IGIRE ,1 ' TRAFFIC STUDY FEDERAL LAND_tOMPANY FOR P.M. PEAK HOUR :�- PARK CENTER DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT TRIPS BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. MANSPOATATION AND LAND USI CONSULTANTS ' �3 � Mr. Martin Colon -6- November 4. 1988 this intersection. With two lanes for exiting traffic and a left turn lane for entering traffic. this intersection will effectively accommodate the development traffic. incerseccion et L�Iff Rew[7 wnri ri.cc aka Read As noted in the "Cliff Lake Galleria Traffic Study." this Intersection will experience a substantial traffic Increase. To accommodate this growth. a major upgrading. Project was undertaken, including widening and traffic signal control. Since the net new trips generated by the proposed development are lower than the site volumes assumed in the "Cliff Lake Gal lerla Traffic Study." the proposed Park Center development will have less effect on traffic operations at this Intersection. ine proposed site plan Indicates that the development would have two access points on Cliff Road - full access at a location opposite from the Driver's License Exam Facility (abbut*1150 feet west of Cliff Lake Road) - right turn in and out only access located about 410 feet east of the full access point Given the close relationship of the above access Points to the County's spacing standards and given the advantages of having a full access point also available to serve the Driver's License Exam Facility. the County Plat Commission recently approved these two Proposed access points on Cliff Road. The Plat Commission expressed concern about the existing four lane undivided design of Cliff Road along the frontage of this development. in this contextt they mentioned two further points: - that a need exists to upgrade this segment of Cliff Road to an ultimate six lane divided design. The segment that presently does not have a raised median Is only about 1/2 mile 1n length (from about 600 feet east of Nicols Rd. to 600 feet east of Cliff Lake Road). - That an access permit for the right turn in and out access point will not be Issued until a median is constructed on Cliff Road. We concur that upgrading of this segment of Cliff Road. Including a raised median, is needed to resolve the existing 1/2 mile gap In the divided design. Such upgrading should Include left turn lanes at the Proposed full access point. in conjunction with the Park Center development it is expected that traffic signal control will be warranted at the full access Mr. Martin Colon -7- November 4. 1988 point. With this design and traffic control. it Is expected that Cliff Road will be able to accommodate the development traffic without significant adverse effects. An impoftant point regarding the upgrading of Cliff Road is to coordinate. as best possible. the schedule for this upgradifig together with the schedule for completion of the develop lent. To this ends we recommend that Federal Land Company.` undertake a Joint effort with the County and City to implement the needed improvements to Cliff Road by 1990. County_ttaff have given a preliminary indication that some County fUnds would be available to apply to this improvement proJecti t, � 3� Page 5/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1988 t" S. The access onto Lexington Avenue will be finalized with all concerned parties. The proposed access entrance to be constructed to a width of 30 feet. 6. Ail signage shall conform to Code requirements. 7. The proposed development is subject to additional requirements pertaining to grading, drainage and f ire hydrant coverage. with the final plat phase of development. 8. The finished floor elevation for the worship center shall be at least.984 feet. All Voted in favor. 0011PREEENSIVE GOIDB PLAN AMENDRENT/RS-8ONING/PARLIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PARE CENTER ADDITION Chaitman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land designation from D -III Miked Residential (21.3 acres approximately) to Commercial Planned Development, a re -zoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development district, a preliminary plat consisting of six lots and a conditional use permit for pylon signs located along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Rahn Road in the southeast quarter of Section 3. Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm informed the Commission that separate 9pplications bad been received by the City for the Park Center Addition, an office/retail complex consisting of approximately 175,000 square feet. Be stated the first application was a request to re -zone 21.25 acres of the Agricultural land to a Planned Development district. -The second application was for a preliminary plat consisting of six lots to be developed in one phase. The conditional use permit was for pylon signage only. He stated it would. be necessary,to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Martin Colon (Federal Land Company) introduced the project to the Commission. Tim brkloff presented an overview of the site plan. He stated the develbper had no problem with staff's recommendations. Be explained; -why the land use would be appropriate due to the surrounding area. Be also explained the landscaping# tbe_parking and the phasl6 of the development. Jim'�$enshoof addressed the transportation elements of the project.''ge explained the traffic study and the access points. He also gavea summary of the meetings with the County. l �� Page 6/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1988 Fran Hagen addressed the utility aspects of the development. He stated there would be no problem in complying with the staff report. Commissionmember Graves questioned when the information would be available from the BRA. Mr. Runkle stated they were waiting for the appraisal and that the information should be available by the end of November. There was discussion regarding the amendment from D -III Mixed Residential to Commercial. Commissionmember Wilkins stated that a precedent had been set and that the City should treat all developet6 equally. Commissionmember Trygg was concerned because there was Single Family areas and a park in the neighborhood. Wilkins stated that there was Commercial or Limited Business all along Cliff. Commissionmember Graves stated that as a result of the study, it appeared that the entire Cliff area might be beat suited for commercial development. There was much discussion between the APC members and the traffic consultant regarding the traffic study. Commissionmember Wilkins asked for a clarification of the phased plans. Mr. Sturm explained the plans. Wilkins asked for the developer's thoughts regarding the phasing. Mr. Colon stated they would prepare the road and the grading and would then develop while working with the County to upgrade Cliff. He stated the development was soft at that point. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the developer regarding excessive commercial development. The developer stated they were consistent with their past statements and he reviewed local development. Chairman Pawlenty stated he felt it was unusual to up -zone property and that he was not against or for the project but felt there was not enough information available at that time to make a decision. The developet stated he felt it was hard to see any consistency with the O'Neil and Peterson pieces. Commissionmember Markley stated he wanted to see if the elderly housing was coming before approval of the project. Chairman Pawlenty questioned if the O'Neil property was up -zoned+ Mr. Runkle stated that the O'Neil property decision was ordered by the Court and that Lexington land was re -zoned. Commissionmember Graves asked if the acreage was sufficient for 120 unit9. The developer stated it would depend on the parking. There was discussion regarding the elderly housing. Commissionmember Graves stated.it was premature to give preliminary plat approval before the senior housing issue was settled. Be also felt the entrance was unsafe. Page 7/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1988 Commissionmember Graves asked what grading was occurring. The developer stated there was grading for the City storm sewer. Commissionmember Voracek remarked that be did not feel the developeU was sincere in preserving the oak trees. He asked how 'much of the Rahn Park hill would be lost. Mr. Sturm stated the hill was in the parki, The architect stated that individual plans would be submitted at the time of the development and that each site would be evaluated individually. He further stated that the southerly portion of the property would be graded and filled. The developer explained to the Commission where the cuts and the fill would be in phase one. Cominissionmember Voracek was concerned regarding conditions one through three. Mr. Poertach explained how the slopes could be attained and stated he saw no problem in working the matter out. Mr. Voracek asked what impact the conditions would have on the parking stalls. The developer stated the drives had been changed from four to two. Voracek questioned if the Cliff Road right-of-way would affect the parking. Mr. Foertsch stated he was unsure and that the issue had no been explored at that time. Commissionmember Voracek felt there were a number of issues that needed to be resolved before the Commission could act on the matter. Be questioned if the Commission wanted to re -zone from Residential to Commercial and felt it was a policy decision. Be also stated that the elderly housing matter was not before the Commission at that time. Chairman Pawlenty stated he had a concern regarding the re -zoning policy. There was much discussion regarding the change of zoning. Trygg moved, Garry seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land designation from D -III Mixed Residential to Commercial Planned Development, a re -zoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development district, a preliminary plat consisting of six lots and a conditional use permit for pylon signs located along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Rahn Road in the southeast quarter of Section 3 because of traffic issues and re -zoning issues. Voracek, Trygg, Merkley, Graves, Garry and Pawlenty voted in favors Wilkins voted against. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -CHAPTER 13-ODDRL HOME PERMITS Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm explained the proposed ordinance amendment to the Commission. There was a brief discussion regarding the purpose of the amendment. Commissionmember Voracek questioned if there was a provision for an exception. Mr. Runkle stated iti;was the intent of the amendment to prevent exceptions. Merkley moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve an amendment to Chapter 13 of the Eagan City Code regarding model home permits. All voted in favor. TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN YRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 RE: PARK CENTER ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the Park Center Addition at it's December 1, 1988 meeting and recommended the following: That the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommend to the Advisory Planning Commission that the Comprehensive Guide Plan not be amended because of the impact on Rahn Park. The motion further stated that the following recommendations be made before approval: 1. The developer provide staff with a tree inventory and revise the grading/layout plan to preserve additional significant vegetation primarily adjacent to Rahn Park. 2. The developer resubmit a landscape plan which increases the density and size of plant material adjacent to Rahn Park providing the required screening/buffering according to the Landscape Policy. 3. A 5 foot wide sidewalk be placed along Cliff Road and the existing sidewalk adjacent to old Rahn Road be extended to the proposed 8 foot trail along Cliff Lake Road. 4. That a catch basin be placed for run-off before entering Rahn Park. 5. That this parcel be subject to a cash parkland dedication. It was further recommended that the details of the run-off issue should be worked out between the engineering department and parks department to insure the least amount of impact on Rahn Park. The curreht request is for rezoning from Agricultural to Planned Development District on 21.25 acres. Also an application is submitted requesting:, the preliminary plat of 6 lots and a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment: The Commission will need to evaluate the following issues: 1: is the proposed land use change from R -III to Commercial PD Compatible with Rahn Park? 2. Does the proposal make every effort'to preserve the existing significant vegetation? 3. boes the proposal provide adequate screening to provide a teasonable buffer to Rahn Park? 4. What are the pedestrian transportation needs? S. What impact does the additional run-off have on Rahn Park? 6. What is the parkland dedication requirement? ISSUE f1 The Commission is aware that almost any land use adjacent to a park can be compatible, 'however, it is generally recognized that residential development adjacent to.parkland is extremely compatible. Therefore, the parcel's R -III designation would be a well suited neighbor to Rahn Park. The question arises whether R -1I1 is compatible with the other adjacent commercial land uses. An alternative land use approach could include the elderly housing proposal with commercial support facilities (i.e. clinic, retail shops, convenience store) being directly adjacent. This elderly housing alternative would work well with adjacent Rahn Park. The park could be developed to provide recreational opportunities to the adjacent elderly residents. A current proposal includes office, retail, restaurant and clinic. This proposal is similar to the past request in which the Commission was concerned regarding it's compatibility to Rahn Park. ISSUE 12 The developer has not provided a tree inventory. Therefore the tree loss analysis is based on aerial map data. A majority of the site is covered with meadow grass. The only significant vegetation lies along the northerly property line and within a hollow located in the north central area of the parcel. This significant vegetation is primarily oaks within the 12-30' diameter range. The building and access road lie within 3S feet of the southern property tine of Rahn Park. Several large oaks will be lost as a result of the grading of the road and building pad. The development plan indicates that a majority of the trees will be preserved within the hollow. The landscape policy requires buffering adjacent to differing land uses as well as scteening of all utility, service and loading areas. The proposal does include a loading area north of the retail anchor. This loading area is within 60 feet of Rahn Park. Staff has reviewed the landscape plan and found inadequate size and number of trees to provide the screening/buffer required by the landscape policy. /1. l An 8 foot bituminous trail is proposed along the west boulevard of Cliff Lake Road. The road is under construction and the trail will be installed this spring. The Comprehensive Trail Systems Plan identifies a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Cliff Road. Lastly, the sidewalk adjacent to abandoned Rahn Road needs to be tied into the proposed bituminous trail along Cliff Lake Road. ISSUE /5 Engineering Department has required the developer to route all storm water drainage to AP -50 located west of the parcel adjacent to Cliff Road. No storm water will directly be outletted into Rahn Park. ISSUE /6 The parcel will be subject to a cash parkland dedication. FOR COlMISS104 ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: I. The pending proposal best suited and compatible with Rahn Park OR The Guide Plan should not be amended from R -III due to the impact bn Rahn Park OR The Elderly Housing proposal with supportive land use is the best suited and compatible land use to Rahn Park. 2.The developer provide Staff with a tree inventory and revise the grading/layout plan to preserve additional significant ,vegetation. 3. `The proponent resubmit a landscape plan which increases the density and size of plant material adjacent to Rahn Park providing the required screening/buffering according to the Landscape Policy. 4. A 5 foot wide sidewalk be placed along Cliff Road. The existing sidewalk adjacent to 'derelict' Rahn Road be extended to the proposed 8 foot trail along Cliff Lake Road. 5. The parcel be subject to a cash parkland dedication. FPO KECEIVEUCEC 5 08 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC'. MEMORANDUM TO: City Mayor Council Members City Staff PROM: Sim Erkkila DATE: December 1, 1988 RE: Comprehensive Guide plan Amendment and Rezoning for "PAtk Center", Federal Land Company In the staff report dated November 15, 1988 for the November 22. 1988 Public Rearing, a' -detailed review of preliminary plans was provided by city staff. In the Plannifig Commission vote to deny rezoning; the shear volume of issues was noted. To�,tlarify the significance of these issues, the following responses are offered: GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL Relative to Grading/Drainage/Erosion control, two (unnumbered) issues were raised, as were 13 other items noted. Unnumbered: Issue 1 (Damage to a newly installed City story sewer pipe which is intended t6 be the A.P-50 outlet). The Developer has two options available to resolve this potential problem; they include: 1. Revising proposed grades over the pipe to eliminate the possibly of tbllapsing the pipe. 2. Replacement of a section of the pipe by the developer, if no other Alternatives are feasible. Unnumbered Issue 2 (Adding a 4 acre vet pond to AP -50). This suggestion is a good one bot pointed out to the developer prior to this staff report. The developer -As prepared to do this. Responses -.to the 13 numbered issues are provided here: 1. A temporary berm vill be constructed behind the retail center prior to Site grading to prevent drainage from going onto the park property. --this will be reflected in final plans. 2. 'the submitted grading plan was preliminary. The 2:1 slope shown behind the retail center can be revised to a 3:1 slope with one or a tbmbination of the following solutions: Aa A retaining wall $! Reducing the width of the proposed service drive `E: Review and lower the proposed finished floor elevation of the retail center. MS MWI nnok eMolena. MU MM ruK MNWTA /w, NO) 41"M MWWs 0010) „o wAmu SCOUVYm. {T. LOYa VAAL aasawtA i Ain City Mayor; Council Members, and City Staff Park Centers Page 2 3. Any retaining wall needed for pond AP -50 will be installed to be at least V above the 100 -year high water level. Presently and in the final plans. slopes will not exceed 3:1 around the ponding area. d. Specifications for seeding and mulching all disturbed areas will be Included in the final grading/erosion control plan. 5. All ingress and egress points will be identified on the site plan and a rock construction entrance pad will be built for construction vehicles. 6. Silt curtains/fences are shown on the plans and will be properly installed before any land distrubance occurs. 7. Ali areas disturbed by utility construction will be revegetated according to final planting plan and seeding and mulching specifications on final grading/ernston control plan. S. All erosion and aediment control measures will be specified on final gtading/erosion control plan and will be maintained until construction is complete. 9. Responsibility for erosion control maintenance shall be called out on future plans once other issues are resolved. 10. Storm sewer inlet filters will be used around all catch basins. 11. Ail storm sewers outletting into water bodies will be adequately piotected with rip—rap to prevent scouring at the outlet. At this tilde, it is not clear if this is a private developer or municipal responsibility. 1I. The final grading./erosion control plan will identify the area to be abed to stockpile topsoil. 13. A project schedule will be provided with a final grading pian. PArs CONCEkNS/SITE AESTHETICS Additionalfield survey work will identify exact tree locations. After zoning approvala specific building footprints will be resolved and at that iiia*, A specific ttee preservation plan can be developed. Additional planting And screening,ttill also be provided to buffer the retail center to Rahn Fatke SL'1C1AP.Y �j Grading, afility, and patk issues are all Manageable items. Final plans can respond t6'each of the isaues raised in the staff report as 1dentifi*d herein. The planniflg process n•e*ssaty to impliment a project as proposed here will provide eMEugh future city reviews to assure all that these ibsuab it! t*doived. TE:mc / Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/OAR CLIFF 3RD ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat for Oak Cliff 3rd Addition/Robert Schlangen, Replat Consisting of Two Lots and One Outlot Located Along the West Side of Slater Road --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their January 26, 1989, meeting to consider an application that was submitted by Robert Schlangen requesting a preliminary plat (replat) of the Oak Cliff 3rd Addition located along the west side of Slater Road and south of Cliff Road. The APC is recommending approval. This item was continued from the February 21 City Council meeting to the March 7 meeting. For information on this item, refer t the staff report, a copy is enclosed on pages through. For a copy of the Director of Publip Works' remarks, refer to the memo enclosed on page(s) /S —' /.57 . For a copy of the APC action, refer to those minutes; a copy is enclosed on pages g through S I The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at its February 2, 1989, meeting reviewed the proposed development and recommended a cash parkland dedication for the additional square footage added to Lot 1, Block 1, and for the Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition if the proposal is approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat (replat) entitled Oak Cliff 3rd Addition. 2-- F"_V_*_ar6TjFJV SUBJECT: PRSI.ffiIiARY PLAT (REPLAT) OAK CLIFF 3RD, ADDITION APPLICANT: ROBERT 8CBLANGEN LOCA' ION: NW 1/4 SECTION 31 :,.• 1 T3777,1777= .I,li W) l : • 7M, 17yalt- r . :� ►I a. . DATE OF PUBLIC NEARING: JANUARY 26, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 9, 1989 APPLICATION SUNNARY An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat (Replat) of the Oak Cliff 3rd Addition located along the east side of Slater Road and south of Cliff Road. The 3rd Addition received Final Plat approval in July 1985 and the Amoco station was built immediately afterward. This new proposal plats 8.9 acres into: Lot 1 (1.15 acres) Lot 2 (1.41 acres) Outlot (6.06 acres) Amoco Station Future Development Both Lot 2 and the outlot are toned LB (Limited Business) within the Planned Development. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN In November 1987, a Waiver of Plat was approved that split the 1.76 acres immediately south of the service station and combined it with the gas station. That would have allowed Amoco to expand this parking lot to the south in the future. A condition of the Waiver of Plat Was that no building or parking lot expansion be allowed until future platting occurred. This plat satisfies that requirement. No building expansion is anticipated at this time --only the parking lot expansion anticipated this spring. A landscape plan consistent with current standards should be required with the parking lot expansion plans prior to Final Plat approval. Lot 2 will be marketable as a buildable lot; however, staff recommends site pian approval by the City Council. If any revisions to the Planned Development Agreement or Conditional Uses are necessary, review by the Advisory Planning Commission will be necessary. 10 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan proposes site grafi ng along the south and east sides of the site. The grading plan proposes filling up to 20 feet to allow for expansion of the existing parking lot. A maximum slope of 3 to 1 shall be maintained and the disturbed areas shall be re -vegetated promptly. Virtually all of Lot 1 is proposed to drain through the parking lot to the southeast to two proposed catch basins. The grading plan shows that the catch basins drain to the south to a landlocked low area along the east side of Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line of Cedar Avenue (T.H. 77). Staff recommends that the proposed storm sewer layout as shown on the grading plan be revised. The two catch basins in the parking lot shall drain to a new catch basin manhole placed in the ditch along the east side of Lot 1. The ditch is in MnDot right-of-way and the flow in the ditch will be 3 cfs during a 5 year rainfall event. A new storm sewer line would be required from the catch basin manhole in the ditch to the south to the landlocked low area. Staff feels that this new layout will resolve the erosion problems that currently exist in this area. Also, MnDot is requiring the developer to revise the storm sewer layout to a layout consistent with the City's request. In fact, MnDot's permit with the developer is contingent on the developer revising the storm sewer layout. Staff recommends that a storm sewer outlet should be provided for the landlocked low area. Besides the drainage from the parking lot on Lot 1, the landlocked low area also receives storm water runoff from the south side of Cliff Road in between Slaters Road and Cedar Avenue, the west side of Cedar Avenue from Cliff Road to the south for 600' and Lot 2. The storm sewer outlet could connect to the City's storm sewer system on Slaters Road which drains westerly to Pond AP -10. UTILITIES: Adequately sized sanitary sewer and water service to serve the proposed development is readily available from the existing utilities in Slaters Road. The existing building on Lot 1 is already served with sanitary sewer and water services. The City's Public Works Department is experiencing maintenance problems with the existing a" sanitary sewer line that serves the Amoco Service Station. The sewer line is frequently plugged -up and the only user on the line at this time is the service station. Staff recommends that the developer should add a sediment trap for the car wash and service station to keep the debris from settling out in the City's sewer line. Also, the developer should routinely clean-out the trap or sump manhole and dispose of the material in a suitable location. According to the City's record plans of the watermain along Slaters Road, the proposed Lot 2 does not have a water service stubbed to the property. Water service is available along the west boulevard of Slaters Road or from a hydrant lead south of Lot 2. , . / k 4 STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The existing service station on Lot 1 will continue to use the two driveway accesses off Sisters Road. The proposed parking lot expansion will improve the traffic circulation of the service station. Public street access to proposed Lot 2 is readily available from the westerly adjacent Slaters Road. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-0F-KAY/PERMITS: Easements in accordance with the C ty o Eagan's at ar s will be required for all sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water mains. Additional easements are necessary for the existing B" sanitary sewer line running along the west property line of the development. The location of the sewer line should be field verified and then an easement dedicated that is approximately two-times as wide as the sewer line is deep. For instance, if the sewer line is 20' deep, then the width of the easement should be 40'. Adequate right-of-way for Slaters Road has already been dedicated. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. The proposed grading and storm sewer construction in the T.H. 77 right-of-way will require a MnDot permit. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City records show the property proposed for platting into the Oak Cliff 3rd Addition has fulfilled only a portion of the obligations due for its pro rata share of the City's infrastructure improvement costs. The following obligations are identified in accordance with present City policy: DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Water Availability $2,015/ac 1.41 $2,841 Charge Lateral Benefit Trunk Main $8.50/ff 218.28 $1,855 water Slaters Road $42.15/ff 218.28 $9,201 SUBTOTAL-Lot2, $13,897 Block 1 Ps S DESCRIPTION Nater Availability Charge Lateral Benefit Trunk Nater Main Slaters Road SUBTOTAL -Lots Block 1 �// All final financial with the final dimensions, and the approval. RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT $2,015/ac 1.15 $2,317 $8.50/ff 180 $1,530 $42.15/ff 180 $7,587 $11,434 $25,331 obligations will be calculated in accordance approved site/grading plans, final plat rates in effect at the time of the final plat OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION CONDITIONS 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B21 Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, and G1. 2. Lot 2 shall be reviewed by City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted for Lot 1 based on current landscape policy requirements prior to the Final Plat submission. 4. The development is required to add a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. 5. The development is required to provide service to each platted parcel. l�� sewer and water STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. H. Easements and Bights-of-Msy 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. t /l STANDARD PAGE TWO OF PLAT APPROVAL S. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. Z. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD /� 1988 STREET MAP ZONING MAP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT lq1 SCHOBORG NO SURVEYING INC* .W.1. wait 2" a6M,0. M cissa M-3=1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: North Star Engineering That -part of Outlet A, OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying north of a line which is parallel with and distant 254.50 feet southerly of, as measured at a right angle to, -the north line of said Outlet A, said parallel line being extended easterly to the easterly•line of said Outlet A. '00CGll/f�oT A _ I 404 Ao -vo %O 0 Mooin &V AWAY & Beier am AM Mr. RECEIVrr _ e Moores row am ro""mr. WAAAW MOM - etre ASAWA 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 O I 1 I I 1 1 I NBf •ice' �� 150 ZI i amen cesnn nrr ram alwrer, Itrq. AW salmer am M&AYla or M:d Iamfa p mover Ile►Orlalme w nur, , Y A rsr &A" r 8=ra� M MW� A were DwT- dc/9d7ap. seL 1429 c. 3/ r. 27 P23 C 90 N m t o ` � a a M '00CGll/f�oT A _ I 404 Ao -vo %O 0 Mooin &V AWAY & Beier am AM Mr. RECEIVrr _ e Moores row am ro""mr. WAAAW MOM - etre ASAWA 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 O I 1 I I 1 1 I NBf •ice' �� 150 ZI i amen cesnn nrr ram alwrer, Itrq. AW salmer am M&AYla or M:d Iamfa p mover Ile►Orlalme w nur, , Y A rsr &A" r 8=ra� M MW� A were DwT- dc/9d7ap. seL 1429 c. 3/ r. 27 P23 REPLAT OF OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION DEVELOPER .NNLER AZIER AVENT APPLE GALLEY. AV APPLE VALLEY. ■w sueorAw / o Mt. ROBERT SOAANGEN .y�• OUTLOT A8355 W.103RO / SLOWWORM. MI �35 ,M (8.06 ACRES) / 1 ---- -- EtWiNEEp �o• � � NORTH STAR ENOINEEROM L'OISILUNTS WC =_�+ v.•.. wiSI LANE NORTH 91E to �� / _ —• � PLwaTH. tH. MM sSAst ooe EXISING zatwm L"= OUSNESS so ore• /y.4 �l PROPOSED ZONWD . ■�` / / f r LOT t umm wrsNE� r / anor c OAR ars (R-3) Lm x lM1ED BUSINESS OUnm A umm BUSINESS LOT t to AtSlq LOT T1L t iFi A �t i s Lor x 1.41 ACRES Scam ss. .;� WnoT A LOBO ACRES . (tae At>iEs7 �� •• TOTAL Ag1El1Q eSr ACRES LEGAL oESCRIP WnoT A aR ars sto AmRW AML L'�aA /o� ti \ . meso w .e� �a iw o . 'i .�� • •. I JJ • meio N a a At m.e .�� tea.. �� • Q,� \ Om RAI{ L1II am MO. RECF IVF. -,'3 "r 7 1 r !MR {.11.61 L _ W o • • 1, - 7 •1 •. • 17 O 1• M 1! ' 10 i a �•- . u . t 1■ OY7LOT • • 237 • • ■ sum ��j • 1 2 �• •I I. .IN I• YI .. .NN M. I OAK C I FF z ..1 •e a ''%yam s ••t—1•'kir Ir 7 . •�• �»f• 7 is a. 1;4 � • i ' I r, ,, y1 •.� �/y VIS L f S�a�esas� U��RaE 180 FF WATECL A\IAILAGIL%Ty COAQ6C — 1. IS A( -RF -.5 7LATeQS F^'.CAt7 U_pC-ParnC- �IB.aB F 1SC4 981&•1 • V I CLIFF ROAD 1 .. • rrd • b- 1 Oil—OI a •r �/� V•O 4` I011-00 1 01 Ile t 1 • tl • u 1 OO L • r, O • • • 17 oil M 1• ' • -u 5 t •••r'i •{� OUT OT • 1 Y Y e Y „n YN' ..q n•N w •�• 09K C IFF s sE 0 rlQ { d � � Y• • . s 1 ` Irta•1 a1y b t s • �..�� till( • S� 4• •: I WATEC AQAI�Af31LA CHAe S Tl GE — I . y l aceE mmsssi LATECAL, Intl=1T wATck -Mukj _ 318.ab F'F. .� LATErAL 7SEf.:EFI7 wA'1 tR#T(2UNn. c•c'. F F. IS3 3 PARA P Z} APPLE I' N OAK A5 VALLEY "i ;SUBJECT PARCEL • Sti•. v.� • v ••: FIG # 3 city of eagah WATER approved:plate PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DE PARTME IST MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 SUBJECT: OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS (FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS) On February 21, the Council considered the proposed preliminary plat for the above -referenced subdivision. At that time, representatives of the applicant took issue with that part of Condition #1 which required this development to accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report. The staff's report identified previous unassessed overlooked financial obligations for proposed Lot 1 (existing service station) in the amount of $11,434. The developer contends that the requirement for this past unassessed financial obligation was waived through negotiations and discussions with staff as a part of the Waiver of Plat processed in September of '88 pertaining to the 50' strip of land between Lot 1 and Lot 2. Attached to this memo is a copy of a letter dated September 29 supporting the applicant's position of their understanding of Lot 1's exception to these financial obligations. The Public Works Director and Special Financial Consultant (Jerry Wobschall) cannot provide any recollection or substantiation supporting the applicant's position. Therefore, the issue should be discussed on its own merits at the Council meeting with any adjustments being provided by specific Council action. Respectively submitted, C/- /PZ Alv_,7L Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Attachment cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk Jerry Wobschall, Finance Consultant /SS September 29, 1988 Mr. Jerry Wobschall City of Eagan � 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Schlangen Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Schlangen Our File No. 32127 Dear Mr. Wobschall: This letter is a follow up to the telephone conference call among myself, Greg Soule, and you of September 26, 1988. This is in regard to Lot 1, Block 1 of Oak Cliff Third Addition and the adjacent 1.76 acres of outlot A. It is my understanding that the City of Eagan will issue a waiver of plat to allow the recording of that certain Warranty Deed dated October 30, 1987 from Cliff Road Partnership to Robert R. Schlangen for the 1.7 acres of outlot A lying north of a line which is parallel with and distant 254.5 feet southerly of, as measured at a right angle to, the north line of said outlot A, said parallel line being extended easterly to the easterly line of said outlot A. A copy of that Deed is enclosed. Mr. Schlangen will be delivering this letter along with the original Deed to receive the endorsement for the waiver of plat. It is also my understanding that the City of Eagan will allow the replatting of Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff Third Addition which will include the addition of the north 50 feet of said 254.5 feet to the existing service station parcel. �Sb BERNICK AND STERN A PROrESS1ONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW INCLUDING NLNSLRs or TNL roRYLR LM' rIRMs or STERN, LEVINE, LIrSON a STRAUSS. P. A. REAL J. SHAPIRO AND •.LLO .ONT[O IN GLUrO11YY I RAYL A. GLRMIC II • • WO AOYITi[D I. RI[CONA�N SERNICR,B NARRO AND OLA$SMAN, P. A. • ARTA IIR J. OLARRYAN •4L0 C[1I,h[O hINIC ACCOYYTAYf RCOTT A.LIPSON PARROALE 1, SUITE 200 SANUEL L. STAN. JLRRT STRAURS•• 6001 GAMBLE DRIVE RORLRT C. RIP[INS OAYIo L.OLRON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 65416 I PAUL J. OUAST SUSAN DICALL NINSRLRO (612) 546-1200 RGRLRT O. RARCNAL•• rALSIMILE (612) 346-1007 September 29, 1988 Mr. Jerry Wobschall City of Eagan � 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Schlangen Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Schlangen Our File No. 32127 Dear Mr. Wobschall: This letter is a follow up to the telephone conference call among myself, Greg Soule, and you of September 26, 1988. This is in regard to Lot 1, Block 1 of Oak Cliff Third Addition and the adjacent 1.76 acres of outlot A. It is my understanding that the City of Eagan will issue a waiver of plat to allow the recording of that certain Warranty Deed dated October 30, 1987 from Cliff Road Partnership to Robert R. Schlangen for the 1.7 acres of outlot A lying north of a line which is parallel with and distant 254.5 feet southerly of, as measured at a right angle to, the north line of said outlot A, said parallel line being extended easterly to the easterly line of said outlot A. A copy of that Deed is enclosed. Mr. Schlangen will be delivering this letter along with the original Deed to receive the endorsement for the waiver of plat. It is also my understanding that the City of Eagan will allow the replatting of Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff Third Addition which will include the addition of the north 50 feet of said 254.5 feet to the existing service station parcel. �Sb BERNICK AND STERN A PROrESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. Jerry Wobschall September 29, 1988 Page Two As part of the settlement of the outstanding issues, Mr. Schlangen shall pay the special assessment in the amount of $3;237.75 which represents that portion of the deferred -assess- ment of the 50 feet of the part of outlot A that he is acquiring. The check is accompanying this letter. Finally, inconsideration for all of the above and the service station being exempt for any portion of the deferred assessment, it is my understanding that the balance of the 204.5 feet of outlot A that is being acquired by Mr. Schlangen will be subject to the deferred assessment to be paid when the property is 'either developed by Mr. Schlangen or sold. I want to take this opportunity to thank you and Greg Soule for your patience and cooperation in bringing this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. SAS/ezc cc: Robert Schlangen Gregory D. Soule, Esq. wobschal.ltr Very truly yours, BERNICK AND STERN A Profess' nal Association Saul A. Bernick (5� MINUTES OF A SPECLfi. MEETING OF RAM ADVISORY PLANNING NAIGAN, NIOSSOTA A special meeting of the Sagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday, January 26, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. at the Sagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Graves, Trygg, Merkley, Miller and Gorman. Alternate Member Boeft was present for absent Member Voracek. Also present were Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Poertsch, City Planner Jim Sturm, Community Development Director Dale Runkle and Assistant City Attorney Mike Dougherty. AGENDA The following two items were added to the agenda: (1) Ordinance Amendment - Chapter 13 - Subdivision Platting Requirementst and (2) Ordinance Amendment - Chapter 13 - Public Design of Street and Utility Improvements. Trygg moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. MARDELANM ADDITION - LARASS MABUPACrURING AND EALEB, INC. This item was continued at the applicant's request to a future Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Q1KFi'Ntla Chairman Pawlenty opened the first public hearing regarding a preliminary plat (replat) of Oak Cliff Third Addition consisting of two lots (2.91 acres) and one outlot (6.06 acres) located along the west side of Slater Road south of Cliff Road in the northwest quarter of Section 31. City Planner Jim Sturm introduced the application to the Commission. Be further updated the Commission on the background of the matter. Jim Phillipi (North Star Engineers) was present representing the developer. Be informed the Commission that the applicant objected to the assessments but would try to resolve the matter before appearing before the City Council. Page 2/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION January 26, 1989 Member Merkley had questions regarding the storm sewer revision. The developer stated the pians were in progress and they would be completed after plat approval. Member Graves asked if proposed condition number 5 would cover the water stub. Mr. Sturm stated yes. Member Markley questioned if standard condition number B-4 should be included in the proposed conditions. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch stated yes. Trygg moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and aoc____rode w preliminary plat (replat) of Oak Cliff Third Addition consisting of two lots (2.91 acres) and one outlot (6.06 acres) located along the west side of Slater Road south of Cliff Road in the northwest quarter of Section 31, as submitted by Robert Schlangen, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied withs Al, B1, B2, B4, C1, C2, C4, D1, F.1, F1, and Gl. 2. Lot 2 shall be reviewed by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted for Lot 1 based on current landscape policy requirements prior to the final plat submission. 4. The development is required to add a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. 5. The development is required to provide sewer and water service to each platted parcel. All voted in favor. BLUE RIDGE SECOND ADDITION - L. A. LB,UL[A DEVZLOPNENT CO. This item was continued to a later time at the meeting to await the arrival of the developer. AUTO= RIDGE ADDITION - JAMES DETELOPNENT CO. Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a rezoning of 38.6 Agricultural acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a preliminary plat consisting of 99 lots located east of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road in the north half of Section 25. IS 1 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting DECEMBER 31. 1988 (GENERAL FUND BUDGET AWUSTMBNT A. 12/31/88 General Fund Budget Adjustment --Each year the Director of Finance prepares a list of budget adjustments for the preceding year. These budgetary adjustments represent certain expenditures that were allowed in 1988 that exceeded the budgetary guidelines that were established for the calendar year. Budget adjustments are required prior to the preparation and finalization of the Financial Report. For a copy of the memo and list of budget adjustments as prepared by the Director of Finance, refer to pagesY! [ through jfgV. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the fiscal 1988 budget adjustments as prepared and presented for consideration. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 SUBJECT: 1988 GENERAL FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Prior to closing the final records for 1988, I would like to recommend a number of budget adjustments. The primary purpose of these adjustments is to allow the City to present a more realistic budget versus actual statement in the December 31, 1988, annual financial report. The request City Council action will formalize the adjustments which are primarily the result of previous policy actions or authorizations which are difficult to pin point in the City Council minutes. It is important to not that this action will only change how the 1988 General Fund operations will be reported as the transactions, both revenue and expenditures, have already taken place. In total the General Fund appropriation will increase by $403,220 from $8,652,100 to $9,055,320, and the $16,280 contingency appropriation will be allocated to operating departments. This budget increase is funded by an increase of $105,000 to the total revenue estimate and by $298,220 from the fund balance. I am, therefore, requesting that the follow line items list by department be amended as follows. Since only a minimu number of line items are listed, neither old or new department totals will foot in this presentation. Also, increases or decreases to these specific line items may be more or less than is actually necessary for that particular line item but serves to balance the department in total. Mayor & City Council Insurance $34.280 Dept. Totals $69,760 Administration Dept. Totals $355,420 Data Processing Dept. Totals $189,980 (co I ($12.800) $21.480 ($12,800) $56,960 $355,420 $189,980 Recommended Department Original Recommended Adjustment Revised Line Item Appropriation Increase (Decrease) Appropriation Mayor & City Council Insurance $34.280 Dept. Totals $69,760 Administration Dept. Totals $355,420 Data Processing Dept. Totals $189,980 (co I ($12.800) $21.480 ($12,800) $56,960 $355,420 $189,980 Recommended Department Original Recommended Adjustment Revised Line Item Appropriation Increase (Decrease) Appropriation Finance/City Clerk Office Supplies $21,000 $4,100 $25,100 Office Form 3.000 2.300 5.300 Dept. Totals $549,260 $6,400 $555,660 Leal Prof.Svcs-Legal $185,000 $121,000 Dept. Totals $185,000 $121,000 Community Development Salaries/Wages-Reg. $487,030 ($52.000) Dept.Totals $1,153,400 ($52,000) Cable TV Cable Franchise Fee $79,520$28,000 Dept. Totals $121,580 $28,000 Police Salaries/Wages-Reg. $1.538.830 $42,000 Dept. Totals $2,588,470 $42,000 Fire Fire Relief Pension $91,160 ($38,000) Buildings Repair 20,000 ( 12,000) Insurance 24,320 ( 5,000) Conf.& Schools 9,800 ( 3,200) Mobile Equip.Repair 12,800 ( 7,900) Mobile Equipment 36.180 ( 32.000) Dept. Totals $577,170 ($98,100) Public Works/Engineering Salaries/Wages-Reg. $304,730 $50,000 Prof.Svcs.-Eng. 20.000 80.000 Dept. Totals $512,970 $130,000 $306,000 $306,000 $435,030 $1,101,400 $107.250 $149,580 $1.580.830 $2,630,470 $53,160 8,000 19,320 6,800 4,900 4.180 $479,070 $354,730 100.000 $642,970 Recommended Department Original Recommended Adjustment Revised Line Item Appropriation Increase (Decrease) Appropriation Streets 6 Hiahways Street Repair Supplies $51,000 $22,000 $73,000 Snow Removal/Ice Control 22,000 16,000 38,000 Equipment Rental 3,000 7,000 9,000 Other Contractual Svcs. 2,000 7,000 9,000 Buildings -0- 68.000 68.000 Dept. Totals $846,000 $120,000 $966,000 Central Services - Maintenance Dept. Totals $254,110 $254,110 Parks S Recreation Salaries/Wages-Reg. $479,350 $30,000 $509,350 Field Equip.Repair Parts 1,000 8,000 9,000 Prof.Svcs.-Eng. 4,000 8,000 12,000 Architectural Svcs. -0- 40,000 40,000 Sporting Event Officials 10,000 16,000 26,000 Electricity 12,000 9,000 21,000 Street Repair -0- 21,000 21,000 Other Contractural Svcs. 5.000 3.000 8.000 Dept. Totals $1,158,620 $135,000 $1,293,620 Tree Conservation Dept. Totals $74,080 Continaencv Transfer to Reserves $16,280 ($16.280) Dept. Totals $16,280 ($16,280) General Fund Totals $8,652,100 $582,400 ($179,180) 63 $74,080 $9,055,320 To balance the increased appropriation level of $9,055,320, I am recommending the following increases to revenue estimates: You will note that the actual revenues exceeded the budgeted estimate by approximately $107,000 while actual expenditures exceeded the budgeted appropriation by approximately $390,000. This results in a utilization of fund balance or the reserve of nearly $300,000. On the revenue side, the budgeted to actual is very close for two reasons. Number one is the fact that revenue is being budgeted less conservatively and number two is the fact that the county made the error on the tax levy which has an impact of approximately $200,000. On the expenditure side there are a number of reasons why actual expenditures exceeded revenues to that extent. They relate primarily to the continually increasing size and magnitude of the General Fund operations. I have not done an exhaustive analysis on a department by department basis which would help determine more specifically what the exact causes were. Certain things such as personnel additions, increased legal billings, numerous engineering studies, department locations and the work on the community center come immediately to mind. In certain cases such as in the Streets Division, expenditures were made during 1988 from carried forward 1987 appropriations. I would suggest that at some point in the future we discuss this matter in more detail. Please let me know, if you have any questions. O0 Finance Te ctor/City Clerk EJV/kf Original Revised Account Estimate Adiustment Estimate Sign Permits $9,000 $15,000 $24,000 Project Admin.Reimbursement 200,000 90,000 290,000 Transfer from Reserves -0-298,220 298.220 Revenue Totals $8,652,100 $403,220 $9,055,320 You will note that the actual revenues exceeded the budgeted estimate by approximately $107,000 while actual expenditures exceeded the budgeted appropriation by approximately $390,000. This results in a utilization of fund balance or the reserve of nearly $300,000. On the revenue side, the budgeted to actual is very close for two reasons. Number one is the fact that revenue is being budgeted less conservatively and number two is the fact that the county made the error on the tax levy which has an impact of approximately $200,000. On the expenditure side there are a number of reasons why actual expenditures exceeded revenues to that extent. They relate primarily to the continually increasing size and magnitude of the General Fund operations. I have not done an exhaustive analysis on a department by department basis which would help determine more specifically what the exact causes were. Certain things such as personnel additions, increased legal billings, numerous engineering studies, department locations and the work on the community center come immediately to mind. In certain cases such as in the Streets Division, expenditures were made during 1988 from carried forward 1987 appropriations. I would suggest that at some point in the future we discuss this matter in more detail. Please let me know, if you have any questions. O0 Finance Te ctor/City Clerk EJV/kf Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting VARIANCE/VILLAUME INDUSTRIES/BUILDING FRONT SETBACK B. Variance, Villaume Industries, Inc. for an 181 Variance from the Right of Nay Located on Lot 5 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 (2926 Lone Oak Circle) --An application has been submitted by Villaume Industries, Inc. for a building front variance of an additional 18 feet from the present building. If approved, the proposed addition would be 14 feet from the property line and 22 feet from the curb. The standard setback for buildings in this category is 40 feet. There is no Advisory Planning Commission public hearing required on this item. For additional information on this itemr9fer to the staf report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages through 4Co. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANTS VILLAUME INDUSTRIES, INC. LOCATION: LOT 5, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION - 2926 LONE OAK CIRCLE EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 7, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 27, 1989 REPORTED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been received requesting a Variance to allow a second floor entrance and exit for the existing offices and operations plant. COMMENTS: Villaume Industries, Inc. is a wood products manufacturer and has been located in Eagan since 1969. They are requesting a front yard Variance ranging from 11'-18' at the nearest point. Currently, the building is approximately 40' from the curb, and approximately 32' from the property line. An additional 18' would allow the building to be 14' from the property line and 22' from the curb. The applicants would like to construct a second entrance in the front of the building to provide an access to the second story. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship as defined by City Code. However, the request does meet the required findings as set forth in Section 11.40, Subd. 3.B.4 and 3.0 of the City Code. 1989 STREET MAP 1987 ZONING MAP T. promo ' MA C, w, W& - .. IIUIL1�1Jh'�� INL7LK'�fLl�i P❑�xi5%�.Y+� LS�F� 3�cu� Ciuiiai Hc^ W b"PMr7 .... ❑Lf4�L'd %5W P=f~,Pl eN%iH opeol Q a LL F v Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting MODIFICATION TO CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA SIGN AGREEMENT C. Modification to Cliff Lake Galleria Sign Agreement --Enclosed on page ,1JQ you will find a copy of correspondence received of Ryan Construction Company requesting a modification of the Cliff Lake Galleria sign agreement. Under the agreement, the larger pylon sign would be located near the Target entrance while a lower monument sign would have been located adjacent to the tenant shops. It is the intention of this proposal to modify the agreement to allow these two signs to be switched such that the monument sign would be adjacent to Target and the pylon sign would be adjacent % to the tenant shops at the locations indicated on page 1-7( . A graphic depicting the design and relative size of the pylon and monument signs is also included on pagei. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's sign inspector, Donna Rollins, and she indicates nothing which would prohibit consideration of this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a modification of the Cliff Lake Galleria sign agreement to permit the pylon sign and a monument sign to be relocated at Cliff Lake Center as presented. coustructiou company OF MINNEB0T4 1NCOgPOp gTEO February 24, 1989 Mr. Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Cliff Lake Retail Centre Eagan, MN Dear Mr. Hedges: In talking with Donna Rollins in your office about the relocation of the new pylon sign at the project site, she asked that I contact you concerning this matter. I would like this item to be placed on the agenda for the March 7 Council Meeting. It is our intention to relocate the new pylon sign to the area near the first entrance to the Centre past the signal lights at Target. We feel that this will be a better location that was approved in August of 1988. The monument sign that is being replaced by the pylon sign will be relocated to where the pylon was originally intented to be placed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 336-1232. Respectfully RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY games Felton Project Engineer cc: Bill McHale clkms/52/jf/sk 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE, 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612/339-9847 FAX 612/337-5552 k lD UFF IN E TMOET MTLOT A ffWF LME trojec: CIF! I are Centre Extenci, Signage - site pion 0.11 A..v 3 C1111 I%Oma I SOWN Cient Ryan CorlsIn,ction Mo c.,o- 11100 so. I Ym. Mo.. 55401 le ! Project# L3451 ! DDa. Somitt 5 or 5 Mile a R. •-CONSULTANTS71 mmfl�ebw'-M�� - irr 4ffgAGnIn I TLT UJ r Cliff Lake Centre Exterla SID — Ptl� & Mo��1 SO :9 L9.. R' -d a a,, Reed I E.W. Wnnpq� aoa11R11 not S MCMI 1900 tm �.. So. I IN+ida Mnri1R /1'"e7 O..o r.ww+v�w nim ws+we w.�a� -ni't.Y.4Vn!y I .R�•f RojeC1I L3431 Dom 5/12f8nT.i5 M*~mss. emirs �� yr �aq nv aY�es SI •C ORSU L T ANTS -1 RC. QYtlueW I swsm�ew�emm� sf��Y�\•m�wlWlfw• RwgY\ 191 �y+�InfY 9s1 10 S ws Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting • 1• -,I A'1:4 d.1 PiTIFe-ii-sTella I i o, 1:4 D. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning of 1.4 Agricultural Acres to a LB (Limited Business) District on Outlot C of the Preliminary Platted Kingswood 2nd Addition At its February 28, 1989 meeting, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider applications received of James Horne for a comprehensive guide plan amendment to change the land use designation from D -II (Mixed Residential) to LB (Limited Business) and a rezoning for a 1.4 AG (Agricultural) acres to an LB (Limited Business) district on Outlot C of Kingswood 2nd Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road and south of Wescott Road. The APC is recommending denial of these applications. For further information concerning this matter please refer to the staff report which is enclosed on pagesi�i'�/�, Minutes of the action taken at the APC meeting will be distributed on Monday with the Additional Information packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 1.4 agricultural acres to a limited business district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminary plat as presented. X73 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECTS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN REZONING APPLICANTS JAMES BORNE LOCATION: OUTLOT C, KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 280 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 22, 1989 REPORTED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D -II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units/acre) to LB (Limited Business) and a Rezoning of 1.4 R-1 acres to a Limited Business district located directly west of the Eagan Municipal Center and south of the old City Hall and Fire Administration buildings. On June 21, 1988, the Kingswood 2nd Addition area received a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the use from D -II to D-1 (Single Family, 0-3 units/acre) and a Rezoning of the entire 41.5 acres from AG and R-1 to an R-1 district. The original application requested R-3 Townhouse density on the Outlot to the north around the pond and a (GB) General Business lot (the subject Outlot C). The Advisory Planning Commission recommended denial of those zoning changes due to the General Business request. The R-3 zoning was requested to the north to act as a buffer to a parcel zoned LB within the Blackhawk Park PD. Meritor Development agreed to down -zone that parcel and did so with the Oak Meadow Addition (single family) in Oct./Nov. 1988. A conceptual site plan has been submitted by the applicant. With a building as large as shown and the parking necessary to serve it, virtually the entire site would be graded and nearly all of the trees would be lost. Due to the size of the proposed building, a secondary ingress/egress for circulation and safety purposes is desired. That access would be between the old City Hall and Pilot Knob Road and is not consistent with plans previously reviewed by the Council and Historic Committee for the development of that area. If single family (although requiring existing topography lots are platted, stovepipe shaped lots a Variance) would be more sensitive to the and consistent with surrounding land uses. 44". 14; 40 a VVr!4M;7 t_, m VOW Li 7_4.Lo wam FL.. TW 7L 17 GITY A4 417.F Ilk Jr, L40r ell C7 PP6.6. s V-Ofrm 4 13LV t LL m VOW Li 7_4.Lo wam FL.. TW 7L 17 GITY A4 417.F Jr, L40r C7 PP6.6. s V-Ofrm 4 13LV Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting E. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat for Sterns Addition (Independent School District #196)--A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at its February 28, 1989 meeting to consider a comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot located east of Dodd Road, south of Diffley Road. The application from Independent School District #196 is for the construction of an elementary school. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information,_ please refer to the staff report which is enclosed on pages - The APC minutes will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on Monday. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a trail and pedestrian walkway system but has recommended a waiver of the parkland dedication fee as a consequence of the nature of the public facilities use. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located east of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMEeIDMENT, REZONING, PRELIKINARY PLAT • (BTERNS ADDITION) APPLICANTS XMZPENDEHT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 LOCATION: NORTH 1/2 SECTION 25 DATE OF PUBLIC RZARINGs FEBRUARY 280 1989 DATE OF REPORTS FEB$UARY 22, 1969 COMPILED BYs COMMURITr DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMKARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located along the east side of Dodd Road just south of Diffley Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The project site is designated in the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan for D -II (Mixed Residential, 0- 6 units/acre). The proposed elementary school would be consistent with a PF (Public Facility - school) land use designation. As such, the project requires a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the land use designation from D -II to PF. This amendment should not -adversely impact the surrounding Residentially -designated land since Public Facility uses are generally compatible with Residential uses. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLANS The site is surrounded by Agricultural and R-1 (Single Family) properties on all sides. The Autumn Ridge subdivision received Preliminary Plat approval on February 21, however the access issue involving all adjacent property owners needs to be finalised before any development can occur. Also at that meeting the school site plan was shown to the Council as all parcels were being reviewed an an overall basis and there was concern expressed that the parking lot/drop off area for the school was such too small for bus movements. The school district architect will review that concern at the February 28 APC meeting and will be able to respond to the building orientation. and the number of parking lot stalls provided. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The referendum was approved in October 1988 and the architects began schematic design in December. The design development began on January 23 after approval by the school board. The district hopes to complete the contract document stage and bidding stage by May 22; actual grading would begin as soon as possible after Preliminary Plat approval. Occupancy is anticipated on June 1, 1990 with the first students .1 that fall. q 1• l'o /TRESTS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public -street access to the proposed sitepresence not available from Dodd Road. The construction of the proposed street lying north and east of the proposed site will serve as its major access to Dodd Road. The design and construction of this proposed street is required to conform to City standards for horizontal and vertical alignment. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-0E-IAY/pERMITSt Slope easements will be required rom the adjacent properties where the proposed grading exceeds the boundaries of the development. The development is required to provide appropriate public utility, street and ponding easements as required by the City. A minimum of 80 feet of public right-of-way will be required for Dodd Road because of the future widening. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agencies. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City records show the parcels nc uded for development at this time have no pending assessments of record and the following public infrastructure improvement charges are proposed in accordance with City policy: DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 'Sanitary Sewer Trunk $1,365/ac 10.66 $14,551 Water Trunk $1,380/ac 10.66 $14,711 Water Availability Charge $2,115/ac 16.46 $34,813 Storm Sewer Trunk $.083/sf 716,998 $59,511 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main $8.95/ff 494.91 $ 4,429 Dodd Road $38.15/ff 494.91 $18,881 Trailway $8.10/ff 494.91 $ 4,009 TOTAL $150,905 All final financial obligations will be calculated in accordance with the final approved site/grading plans, final plat dimensions, and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. PARRS ISSUES: The elementary school proposal will be waived of parkland dedication. The parks dedication fee would be implemented with a future change in land use. Staff has provided the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission with several Q --a-lternat-i-ves- -for—the-tra4-l-along_ -Street. A.._-_ —_ _ GU= STANDARD COHDITIOM OF PIAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and ffigbte-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or,public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee Its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until_ one_ year after_ the date of _installation. �9 tea` _ v'4 ---l1 Hadm" odw "W I I tomemmm. i� 6D /196 Eh mm" Sdnds Stens Rte Phn �O, The Wins AvAciAiw• AmNWIs platy n. 1!M9 RECEIVED JAN 17 09 .%oow4xhT 3C"3L OGTR= NM no ELEWNTARY SCHOOL GRADW PLM ,..�.. - . I A. ' 1 E •V::•h t V t 4 / � ac Jef t 0 z — — — — — — — soLmmw ANG TomotAPM SWEY can w t 1 1 r I f s 1 N \ ,L• /i r r.—N • ..r �// DODD ROAD UPGRADE - 494.91 F.F. r r \ J�`r•_ • • N irr• �'� ± Nr �' =. �w '•'1."'.L�ii.Ti LTi..• �w—� is :1 L—. BOLNOW AND RwPFC SAWY �aewr ae:anerw X7,.5• {�r,:�;��:},�: •'�•.•,• }�• :.'},Ti• Vh •}};:}lf��:, y.' yy •+`i}``h'•••'•3i'•:•: •:�•.p{i.�C'v' '::tiv:} 7:+i• :'F.r;:;:r' ��:fi' • C vry r.. X to ,• f},y WATER TRUNK - 10.00 ACRES .. I r IP -t271 ! ,o .00 gg77gg 0� BB4. � li!� INI 164.4 I fi !!9 " LP -6 7:3i3 08 ! '=f SUBJECT PARCEL FIGO 1 city of sagari STORM SEWER aarno�►.d: standmrd PUBLIC plate9: WORKS MASTER PLAN DE J be prepared in time for the March 28th Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Appropriate actions to direct such rezoning may be taken at the March 21st Council meeting. 4. Finally, it will be necessary to appraise any surplus properties which the Council intends to offer for sale. The sale may be either by bid or negotiation provided that the purchase price is found by the Council to be fair in light of the appropriate appraisals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To direct staff to take appropriate actions to undertake a rezoning of the appropriate parcel and disposal of the remainder. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting DISCUSS/PROVIDE DIRECTION/HUD PARCELS IN LEXINGTON SOUTH P. Discuss/Provide Direction, HDD Parcels within the Lexington South Planned Development --As the Council is aware, the City through the auspices of the Park Department has been working at considerable length to acquire certain portions of the Lexington South Planned Development which were repossessed by HUD. In addition to the targeted property whose acquisition was intended, as a consequence of the acquisition, the City also acquired certain other parcels in Lexington South. Also, as a consequence of the acquisition of the targeted parcel, the previous reservoir site located at the northwest corner of Lexington and Diffley Roads is no longer required for City purposes. Staff has begun discussions on the potential disposal of the surplus properties resulting from this purchase. Enclosed on pages -_his a copy of a memorandum from Parks and Recreation Director Vraa to Community Development Director Runkle concerning this property. The report includes not only graphic depictions of the parcels in question but also assessment searches of certain parcels. As a consequence of this memorandum and at the direction of the City Administrator, the Community Development Department has undertaken to define the means by which the desired property will be rezoned to an appropriate use and the surplus properties will ID be disposed of. Enclosed on pages -.Aou will find a copy of a memorandum from City Planner Sturm concerning his discussions to date with Mike Dougherty of the City Attorney's office in this regard. Staff is requesting direction from the City Council concerning several issues: 1. It will be necessary for the City Council to find that the property is no longer necessary for City purposes and qualifies as surplus property. 2. The Council may refer the matter to the Advisory Planning Commission for review in light of the Comprehensive Guide Plan or the Council may deem that the sale of property has no relationship to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and that no action is necessary by the Advisory Planning Commission. If the Council finds the latter, a four- fifths vote would be necessary to approve such finding. 3. It will be necessary to undertake a rezoning of the parcel at the southwest corner of Diffley and Lexington to permit public facility development of the site. If the Council so wishes, the appropriate notification can TO: DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Ch FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1989 RE: HUD PROPERTY/LEXINGTON SOUTH Dale, as you know the Parks and Recreation Department is in the process of acquiring property formerly held by Lexington South. Two of the parcels, one located south of Diffley Road, the other north of Wilderness Run Road, have been designated to be sold as "surplus property". It seemed to me that the Community Development Department should coordinate and handle the sale of these properties, rather than the Parks & Recreation Department. I have spoken to Tom Hedges regarding this, and he is in agreement. Therefore, I will assume that Community Development will take up the responsibility from this point on for the coordination and eventual sale of the land. (Jim Sturm has received a memo from Mike Daughtery concerning the property sale which will help guide you in this process). Please be aware that I have spoken to Brad Swenson about these two parcels. He does have an interest in both and will be submitting a letter of interest/proposal within the next two weeks. Also, Mark Parranto has an interest in the parcels. In addition to the two properties from Lexington South, there is a third property that is to be offered for sale. This is the property formerly designated for the water reservoir, north of Diffley Road, west of Lexington Avenue. Please coordinate with Tom Colbert regarding this parcel. The property off Diffley and the former reservoir site, should have priority in sales; at least, from this department's prospective. The parcel located immediately east of Walnut Hill Park, could have some parks purpose which we would like to review further. Consequently, until we have time to study this parcel,. I am in no particular hurry to see this parcel offered for sale. Proceeds from the sale of all properties will be returned to the park site acquisition and development fund, which is being used to finance the original purchase from Lexington South. Attached are photo copies of the two Lexington South parcels, along with the special assessment search on each. If I can assist you with the sales, I would be more than happy to provide you with that help. KV/bls cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works W ■1L �., r rVIP Ol1'-��nn rr:�.. p -r �Ir = n••r== =: ; . c�l�i.: �t�l��■ �• �'� inn� =�� C uunr.111' / _.o �f 1 .. sr- -4 p:\' q� l ) ! •l' �r�w 1.1�111111J - �� a � •iCf / 'II� i•�IIJ � �. ��1C' �/) 1-- '� �►+., . 1111►��■ WoApo 1�i,`j,��J�nr�� .■IV��■�■ _� I/0�'■■uv�'� asele.e a.e••n .. ._. ... __ __. __ ...-.. .-•GIiVNIT No :t ala•a S •.. s Safi !• tr as ;, �r t d_:I me .r • .. ._- y S 89. 52' 25 E 736.39 1 I i r.. CUTLCT• A y ! VRIAI[ DRAM I IMPT l !SPER GO2 W SEE DE?A1L . - N 55.06'56 t 1 R • 230.97 ', oy4 'S • k4. • '> L•' 169.46 p r -S 82050, SC Z 80.O0 N 07.09' 10 _77 80.00 1zl��iF�JA' —N 82.50 ` Jtl—J e0.0 0 11 k 255.00 : oy 11 ` '1.°� ` £ rle 2ex it .. .,•lj�.. Q• L•83.09 3 a• l —SOJA • • ,l. L• i20.a9 q MIN : � w..•. • C j ,N, -1 c� ix a GOAT la 0 T IF • COUNTY'. STATE c .aw •wr,•�•n� MIOMIMA—i,.—,, wlaw.30•• ti •wwa•r w�' .V • , • •, , .Y• -`awl JIL'• .• q \ • Jr• +.mss`. • /' � P �� S�` , • t' �� • -. • 'SII• , a/.�' • ��{y .h• ' �. 04 y me TM O 396 ., / ••'fin' . T W T[ALY 47.20 `•{" ; ' : �, •—•• , •4 • �. a .. 16 .- �' ' + ■ WOO Woo � N 11636 94w .. � ' • ••+• ' . . ••. •' • • � • JwY•rn'. _q� 9497 i YONKT0IMN. N 23.07 WE '� µ' :r • e . . .� 62.08 • + LOTO� `* • _+ , . T q • SIM av:M i S • q 92.31 �' i `•ti;, ,. i• �• '"•. r N23043'02wE . fi•. .• " .: a \ r," i•�! ' �3 93.87 • 0 L 0 G K •i n • "*y YA ..... .� • 4 � ,. � / .. ...�. �... ..� Vis. _ • "t t1 /1�4• �, .r • �• •w 4 f Alw Jam... + �.. • •i ' , bs FA N 00.09 WE : �. • ' ' _ . �� :. • ;• '! 148.41 .' ::� " � .. +w'�..'....a _ ..n+� VSs ..: . � •• ��: • :A. a !:. I TRANSACTION Ir: R768 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY PROFErTV 1.';. TODAYS DATE: 01/27/89 ---SPECIAL FLAGS ---- 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-5-9-10 10-0:!61=4•• +; �•••0 ' •iii�C��iL•T` _-_.-__-_CiCCCii�Z=`iCS_-i-----_SiiiCCiiCi�iiiii.Liiii__iii_Ci�iiiii 5.A.* A&3FE• S; -Q7 Df SCP. VH YRS RATE TOTAL ANN. PRIN. PAYOFF COMMENT 10057 W:.;TF• r :_;al Of. 20 8.00% 684.15 34.21 371,. 2E 1(W574 Re -.4 . a7 GO 20 8.00% 368.29 18.42 202.57 i`I0570. =-- •r: . eO 20 P.O ': 3209.60 160.48 1765.2E 100579. .d4 We A°:E, 80 20 8.00% 3209.60 160.48 1765.23 100577 ;;:.:Fc� LAT 80 15 8.00% 516.53 34.43 206.60 10057A -JC-Tr-'v LA -1 SC 15 8.00% 432.41 28.83 172.9: 100647 WalEk'9AIN 83 15 10.54% 2019.60 134.64 1211.76 100649 S=W1.44 LAT 83 15 10.50% 5322.52 354.84 3193.52 10P5c;S UTT1 to ETF. ; -:C' T 00 0 .00% 93823.00 93823.00 93823.00 PEND 1OP51e IT'_;�I:S 00 15 .00% 15265.00 1017.67 1526E.00 PEND *****a Sl:^"mARY OF ACTIVE 15762.70 926.33 8894.26 COMM ****** THIS YEAR'S TOT P&I 1834.38 ** *** SUMMAR- OF PENDING 109088.00 109088.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY Pkl==nT TODAVS DATE- 01/27/89 ---SPECIAL FLAGS---- /� 1-2-3-4-3-6-7-8-9-10 70-02A,54'-�.f._l-2 S.A.4 a55_SSwE!Li =Ec-:r. YR YRS RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF COMMENT pie kse a J�h•Ic,r. -•t A--7' ; k•IF .00 .00 .00 CC T:T %'&i .00 0(.,,a .• ••rYM I now.. • • •tart we •w w.. .. A. m r. •.0 r mw u• • •. Y. + r rY i a•.rr.YY .•N• .. ..w.. WAL t HILLI `� „ E�ew /�Jj I o 30-od 029-75 r�` •. �: )20.00 wf- 7 o•r.o. ° OAR K ' A S of* ooe.ft IIUM ` •• -� .:'` '°ON I pt i ••': �•4R .w• r+• Y 0 ', w•,Ywr.r fir.•, . y 19040 i+ & a•P9 R� 'y�� imrtNOE19NCI • MR Vfjv NOMI! � � 'S � Nn�r-._ � � 9 I �i ` � ' � ."• ! u �110 11., . i3o tris ti� , 19040 fir ate'. '� :� '$vd� .rt �tY 2, ^• y �.r /.v H -98 a 4 •� ��'�."MIRTERFDRO✓� ,' � ii5 .�ei+,. `• ' SUDBERR• 64 • r • / r •i.' r• •" •meq 1 .• .r Y L- , • i.'r A••i• ' r \ .•� 7' V M i • • • e .t 4 a •� 1 f• . : N !a l.r I Y .r• • .• •w wN •� 'rRAN,S,- 7 NN TD% Fk7e-.8 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY TODA,S DATEe 01/27/89 ---SPECIAL FLAGS ---- 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 10 3^-•:-G- J:, aW.010--f----- ------------------ -------- s=--------------- ----------------- S.A. & AFGSSSMEr. ' DESCR. 1f17s%i ccp:CC. : -T 10057E k'ATFP, LAT 100577 FFWr.k TRZ 10008! - PRE 4 1n05P! FTrRSET 1005PZ 5-W LA'S 10064: 6--7R 349- 1001,92 WLT.R 299-3 ta�aaa SUMMA.Rv OF ACTIVE a�raaat THIS ►'EAR'S TOT PSI YR YRS RATE 80 15 8.00% 80 15 8.00% 80 1_5 8.00%. so 15 8.00% SO 15 B. O0% 80 20 8.00% 80 20 8.00% 81 15 11.00% 81 15 11.00% TOTAL ANN.PRIPI. 8768.48 584.5-1 7341.04 489.41 5558.00 370.54 5558.00 370.54 5221.44 348.10 5531.12 276.56 1643.32 82.17 3728.76 248.59 2759.96 184.00 46110.12 2954.48 4890.94' mm PAYOFF COMMENT 35117.40 2936.44 2223.23 2223.23 2088.59 3042.13 903.8a 1740.12 1288.04 19952.98 FEB 28 189 16:60 MRS 743 P02 N/• rn /J 1%� /� 1, • , 7 \s" '' 4 Y , ' 9 3 ., t• \ S " T • . J ` n If w aWR:VL 3P!I_ - — _.\f0 •� II ° to ` �^ n s .,.:o „o . f. Ell, or uw• 9. - ►Z } 14 - .Pa . � I ° 41, 1 24 COUNTY TATE a , .,'_;° MEMO TOt TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RE: HUD PROPERTY WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH P.D. This memo is intended to act as a guideline for the purchase and disposal of parts or all of four individual parcels within the Lexington South Planned Development. 1. The southwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road - current zoning: R-4 (multiple) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: D -III (Mixed Residential, 6 - 12 units/acre) 2. The northernly extension of Daniel Drive at Diffley Road - current zoning: R-3 (townhouse) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: CPD (Commercial Planned Development) 3. Along the north side of Wilderness Run Road and east of Walnut Hill Park - current zoning: R-2 (double) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: P (Parks) and D -I (Single Family) 4. A portion of the previously proposed/denied Soderholm Addition at the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue/Diffley Road - current zoning - R-4 (multiple) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: D -I (Single Family) After discussion with Mike Dougherty, it has been determined that in order for the City to sell any or part of the parcels, the City Council must first find that: 1. The property is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was acquired, "surplus." 2a. The Advisory Planning Commission should review the proposed property to be sold assuring that there is no conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, however ...... 2b. The City Council may deem that the sale of the property has no relationship to the Comprehensive Plan and that no action is needed by the Advisory Planning Commission. A 4/5 vote is necessary. This process may begin at the March 7 City Council meeting if the Council declares the parcels as 'surplus' and directs the Advisory Planning Commission to initiate any desired rezonings and/or Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments. This action could be taken at the March 28 Advisory Planning Commission meeting and FEBRUARY 28, 1989 PAGE TWO Before any parcels can be sold, appraisals for each must be obtained. The Soderholm parcel was appraised recently at approximately $3.00 per sq. ft. The other two parcels will need appraisals. This is currently being coordinated by Mike Dougherty. The sale of the property does not need to be made a public bid, but can be negotiated on a contractual level as long as the offer for purchase is first determined by the City Council to represent a fair price. For now, I will await direction by the City Council on March 7. If rezonings and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments are initiated, I will coordinate the necessary applications/procedures for action by the Advisory Planning Commission on March 28. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know. JS/js Attach. CC: Mike Dougherty, McMenomy & Severson Jim Sheldon, McMenomy & Severson Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation Kristy Marnin, Planner 1 NOTE: Mike informed me there is a title problem on the proposed athletic field site at this time and hopes to have it cleared up before mid-March. Only if the City has clear title will we be able to initiate rezoning to a Public Facilities district. we will prepare all legal notifications as directed by the City Council in hopes that the issue is resolved prior to March 21. aka MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HBDGES DATE: MARCH 1, 1989 A meeting has been scheduled by the MWCC for Thursday, March 9 at 7:30 p.m. at the Dakota County Western Court Facility to examine how best to handle residual solids generated at the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant. For more information, refer to the attached notice enclosed on page �L. KELZENBERG'S VIOLATION OF ACCESSORY HOUSING As you may recall in December 1987, the accessory housing application for the Kelzenbergs was denied. Due to several ordinance reviews and amendments, the City Attorney's office is now confident that a notice of violation can be served and a letter was sent out certified mail dated February 16. Mr. Yetzer has been notified that the letter would be served to Kelzenbe'/ A copy of the letter is enclosed on pages �_ r . through b STRATEGIC PLANNING / This office has received an outline of the strategic planning / goals and other material as prepared by Jim Brimeyer and once a memo has been prepared, a copy will be distributed to the City Council. The first work session to deal with the highest goal agreed upon by the Council and management team is scheduled for March 28. I thought it might be interesting for the City Council to review the mission statement that was adopted approximately one year ago, a copy is enclosed on page,-,) (—). Enclosed on page is a copy of the Municipal Legislative Commission's position regarding the League of Minnesota Cities Tax Coordinating Committee report. This position was adopted by the Board of Directors which Mayor Ellison serves on at a meeting held on Thursday, February 2. Also enclosed on pagesR!2aRD1s a copy of a summary sheet regarding property tax that was presented at a Twin West meeting by John Tomlinson. I: WWI C [Lin 14 in Ilil Enclosed on pages through c is a status report for Dakota County and the City of Eagan for assisted housing and community development as prepared by Dakota County Housing and C;) U::L- Redevelopment Authority. Enclosed on page is a letter from Health East, Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital, informing the City of the addition of a new Road Rescue Type III ambulance to the Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital ambulance fleet. Enclosed on pages ;a��2 through -2,;0 is a copy of a proposed aviation noise policy that will be considered at the National League of Cities Legislative Conference on March ll. Enclosed on pages7!q---Q3(ts a memo to City Administrator Hedges from Director of Public Works Colbert regarding a meeting he attended concerning the Burnsville/35W Transportation Coalition. POND LP -55 WATER ELEVATION Enclosed on pages -23 -7 -.As a copy of a owners regarding the Pond LP -55 water informing them of a neighborhood meeting March 8, 1989 in the Eagan City Council issue. /s/ Thomas L. Hedaes City Administrator -)(3 letter sent to property elevation level issue, scheduled for Wednesday, Chambers to discuss this Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL CO 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE 612 222-8423 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) will hold a public meeting to provide information on the findings of Phase II of the Residual Solids Management planning study. The purpose of the study was to examine how best to handle residual solids (the by- product that remains after wastewater has been treated) generated at wastewater treatment plants in the MWCC's southwest service area over the next 20 years. (The southwest service area includes wastewater treatment plants in Eagan, Shakopee and Chaska, which serve more than 500,000 people in those three communities and more than 20 others, including Burnsville, Bloomington, Savage, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Orono and parts of Apple Valley.) The meeting will be held on THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 7:30 p.m., at the Dakota County Western Court Facility, 2030 Cliff Road, Eagan. This meeting will deal primarily with MWCC's Seneca Plant, located in Eagan. (A later meeting will focus on MWCC's Blue Lake Plant, located in Shakopee.) Representatives of the engineering firm Black & Veatch, which conducted the study, will report their findings and present their recommendations. A question and answer period will follow. Information gathered at the meeting will be used by the Commission in formulating its residual solids management plan for the Seneca Plant. All interested people are invited and encouraged to attend the meeting. You may register in advance to speak by contacting David Downing of the MWCC's Office of Public and Community Relations, (612) 229-2100. You may also send written comments to this office at MWCC's Central Office. (See address below.) Comments must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 10, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFF}Rh7t4ACTION EMPLOYER EI)wARII B. MI,MENOMY LARRYS. SEVERSON' JAMES F. SI ELDON J. PATRICK IYII.("OX' 'I'I: R ENCI'. 1'. 111 HKIN %III II:\I`.I.I1 IuUGIII(ICI'% HE 111.1. 11A NB I MICHAVLE 'A I. i I.liIN h MA L11 KN91.1� IN N 416 I:\L<u Lb "LN51iD 1? NEh:IfIIM L\%K:\ February 16, 1989 CERTIFIED MA L - RRR Michael lzenberg 1725 De rwood Drive Eagan, MN 55122 McMENOMY & SEVERSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW Ef REPLY TO: 7300 WEST 147TH STREET P.O. SOX 20.326 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 TELKFAX NUMBER 4:12 MM ,81214:r!31:16 D REPLY TO: 144W SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL. ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA MW (612)4211155 RE: Residential Ordinance Violation Our File No: 206-6240 Dear Mr. Relzenberg: we write as City Attorneys for the City of Eagan. PA 111. J.tin I:I( PATRICK W. STEWART KKVIN 1'. CARROI.I. KENNETH R. IIALI. tiCUTT O-101INSfON 1 .1 O S I: I' I I I'. I:: \ H I . ha' MAIn' I.. I;OI.IK1: MICHAEL C. Md1ANN uP t'OUNSF.I. LEONARD I'. IIIERNAT .JOHN I:. VUKELICH You are hereby notified that you are in violation of Eaaan City Code, Section 11.20, Subd. 5. Your home is located in a district zoned R-1. This means that only one -family detached dwellings are permitted. By allowing renters, unrelated by blood, marriage or adoption, to reside in your lower level and providing them with complete independent living facilities, you are in violation of the above -referenced zoning ordinance. A violation of the zoning ordinance is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine up to $700.00 and/or 90 days in jail. The City staff has made numerous attempts to work with you on this matter to no avail. They have now turned the matter over to us for criminal prosecution. If you are not in compliance with the City zoning ordinance by April 1, 1989, you will be cited for criminal violation of the City zoning ordinance. OA�� McMENOMY & SEVERSON A PROFESSIONAL ASST II'I ATIIIN A'ITORNKYS AT LAN Michael Kelzenberg February 16, 1989 Page Two I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible concerning this very serious matter. Sincerely, McMENOMY & SEVERSON, P.A. Joseph P. Earley J PE/di k cc: Dale Runkle, City of Eagan ,,T,6m Hedges, City of Eagan a (,co "It is the objective of the City of Eagan to encourage quality development. To accomplish this objective, the City will focus less on the quantity of development and more upon the effect. of development on the delivery of City services, the aesthetics of the community, the quality of life of current residents, the best interests of future residents, and an acceptable balance of residential, commercial and v public uses." MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION'S POSITION P REGARDING THE LMC TAR COORDINATING COMMITTEE r REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS .1,,I°The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) is a group of 15 metropolitan suburbs representing more than 570,000 Minnesota residents. Property tax burdens on these residents have been increasing at an alarming pace during the past few years. ty+� Therefore, the MLC has taken a keen interest in property tax reform, making it our number one priority during the 1989 C ,r legislative session. A major purpose of joining the League of Minnesota Cities Tax Coordinating Committee was to attempt in good faith an effort to arrive at consensus among all city organizations. This effort produced several recommendations with which we agree and others with which we could not agree. The MLC submits the following policy statement as its response to the Coordinating Committee's recommendations. MLC POLICY The MLC's highest legislative priority in 1989 is to reduce the tax burdens on homes which exceed $68,000 of market value. we believe that the Coordinating Committee's report did not go far enough in addressing this problem. Additional tax relief dollars must be directed toward areas with a concentration of mid and high valued homes. The MLC endorses the Coordinating Committee's recommendation to reduce the tax capacity on homes over $100,000 from 3.3% to 2.8%.. We also agree with reducing the tax capacity of homes between $68,000 and $100,000 from 2.58 to 2.08. In the future the MLC will strive to enact legislation which will eliminate or reduce the difference between these split classifications on homes. The MLC strongly opposes the concept of tax -based equalization aid (TBEA) as proposed in the Coordinating Committee's recommendations. This form of aid will increase rather than decrease the disparities between tax burdens in the Metro Area compared to tax burdens in Greater Minnesota. The MLC supports a property tax relief program to homeowners which is based on the following factors: 1. property tax relief must be dependable, 2. property tax relief should be calculated on a per home basis, and 3. property tax relief should not be expenditure driven. The MLC believes that the legislature, as a policy, should . direct state -paid relief dollars to the area of the state where tax increases are projected to occur in 1990. Only by adhering to this policy will the disparities be reduced between metro and non -metro areas. o ,��:•��.. M'j February 9, 1989 A PROPERTY TAX REFORM GOALS OF ADMINISTRATION 1. Reduce taxes on rental horsing, business, and mid -value homes. 2. Simplify classes and aid formulas. 3. Clarify state and local responsibilities. 8 MINNESOTA'S COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY TAX RANKINGS VARY GREATLY DEPENDING ON THE EXTENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY (EQUIPMENT AND IIWENTORIES), WHICH MINNESOTA DOES NOT TAX TYPE OF PROPERTY High-tech factory Retail store Office building Combined offices & factories, industrial co. MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX COMPARED TO OTHER STATES Half of average Double the average 50% to 100.5 above average 6% to 57% above average C IS THE PROPERTY TAX/LOCAL AIDS SYSTEM UNFAIR TO THE METRO AREA? 1. The metro area gets only about 1/3 of school aids. 2. Metro homes pay twice the property tax of comparable non -metro homes, yet receive no more services. 3. The metro area pays 65°x6 of state taxes. 4. Metro area property taxes have been rising much faster than non -metro taxes. Almost all states use a property -wealth equalization formula for school aid, and the metro area has property wealth about double that of non -metro area. Metro local governments, in total jd2 spend more. The overall mill rate is about the same in metro and non -metro areas. The property tax is a tax on the value of property. The metro area has much higher average individual incomes, still has much higher disposable income left after taxes. Metro area market values have been rising, non -metro values have been falling, especially farmland. Status Report for Dakota County** January 1989 Amount * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. o0 .;)- 1 of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total Section 8 Existing: Certificates 410 1143 1,553 +19 Vouchers 121 235 356 +2 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 200 580 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,162 2,466 3,628 +21 Amount Commercial/ of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase MHFA Local Participation 0 5 0 5 0 MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 173 0 213 3 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 65 78 0 143 2 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 135 0 145 2 Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 90 182 0 272 3 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 371 1,499 0 1,870 16 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612 2,161 8 2,791 26 * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. o0 .;)- 1 Status Report for the City of Eagan January 1989 ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Existing: Certificates Vouchers Section 8 New Construction Low Rent Housing 236 Rental TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Amount of Total (+/_)* 28 226 254 +5 25 64 89 +2 0 33 33 0 0 18. 18 0 0 144 144 0 53 485 538 +7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderlv MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 Weatherization 5 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f2- * + = Increase/- = Decrease day Amount of Family Total Increase 14 16 0 3 6 0 10 11 0 6 7 1 68 73 0 101 113 1 HealthEast February 7, 1989 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City of Eagan Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 724 Nineteenth Aeenue North South St. Paul, MN 55075 612.450-4500 We are pleased to announce the addition of a new Road Rescue Type III ambulance to our fleet in Dakota County. This vehicle is "state-of-the-art" and includes a 16 -channel VHF radio in which we will be able to communicate to all police and fire agencies, as well as mutual aid services in our region. We are proud of this new acquisition. It will help us continue to give your city the best in pre -hospital care. Sincerely, Martin E. Forseth Operations Manager jl c: Harlan Dahl, Director HealthEast Transportation '.�.�)3 National Organization to Insure NO 09 10 So a Sound -controlled Environment Ee THOMAS N. DUFFY Executive Director 1620 EYE STREET, N. W. — 3rd FLOOR, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 a 202-429-0166 February 3, 1989 ^'r& 6 MEMORANDUM: TO: Board of Directors FROM: Thomas N. Duff'.Xkc, SUBJECT: N.O.I.S.E. Policy At Its last meeting, the Board of Directors discussed u1 proposed Aviation Nolse Policy. The consensus was that the policy proposal should be redrafted, sent to Directors and reconsidered at the Board meeting on March 11, 1989. The redraft Is enclosed. Please go over It before the meeting. If you cannot attend the March 11th meeting, please send me your comments before the meeting. I will make sure they are Introduced Into the discussion. aa� NOISE POLICY As one of America's most important national assets, it is imperative that the nation's system of airports is prepared to meet current and future transportation needs. Unfortunately, that system is in a shameful state of readiness. Straining to meet current transportation needs, today's airport system will be unfit to carry the burden of future transportation demands unless wide-ranging measures are undertaken immediately. Deregulation of aviation, coupled with an expanding economy, has dramatically increased the number of flights. This increase in flight frequency, coupled with the urbanization and suburbanization of land surrounding airports, has also dramatically increased the number of people impacted by aircraft noise. The millions of Americans affected daily by aircraft noise has magnified the political pressure to constrain operations at existing airports at the same time the growth in flights is dictating that airport capacity be expanded. It has become obvious that the existing airport system cannot handle the dual demands of increasing airport capacity and reducing the impact of aircraft noise. The aviation industry has proposed a "technofix", the implementation of an all Stage 3 fleet, in order to alleviate the bring relief to noise impacted people. These noise mitigation measures can be implemented without decreasing airport capacity. Land use planning should also be considered as a means of mitigating the effect of aircraft noise. Land use planning is best done on a local level and NOISE strongly supports the pre-eminent role of local jurisdictions in any land use decisions. Local airport operators should also retain their prerogative to implement noise mitigation procedures. NOISE believes that aircraft noise mitigation and expansion of the nation's aviation capacity need not be mutually exclusive goals. Aircraft noise reduction advocates and aviation industry officials can and should work together to bring aviation service into the 21st Century. Listed below are NOISE's recommendations for achieving an aviation system that is capable of handling transportation needs and is compatible with the environment: 1) The FAA should recommend, establish criteria for and fund a system of new regional jetports that would reduce the current strain on the nation's aviation system and be able to handle future demand. Local jurisdictions should construct and operate these jetports. The jetports should be constructed in areas where the noise impact would be minimal and where local jurisdictions are 3 - 7) Flight track monitoring and noise monitoring should be - required at all commercial airports. These reports should be made readily available to the public. 8) The FAA definition of noise impacted areas should be redefined and noise impact scales such as Ldn should be supplemented with or replaced with more meaningful measures. 9) Local jurisdictions should retain their pre-eminent role in land use planning and noise mitigation procedures around airports. Citizens in aircraft noise impacted areas should have input in land -use plans for areas surrounding airports and in noise mitigation plans. Preventive land use planning should be encouraged wherever possible, especially when planning new airports. MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 SUBJECT: BURNSVILLE/35W TRANSPORTATION COALITION On March 2nd, a meeting was held at the Burnsville City Hall with representatives from the cities of Burnsville, Lakeville, Bloomington, and Richfield, as well as others from Dakota County, Burnsville Chamber, Scott County Transportation Coalition and other interested individuals to discuss the details and process of creating an organization to get actively involved in supporting and promoting the ultimate upgrading of 35W from Dakota County to downtown Minneapolis. References were made to previous special interest organizations such as the Urban Coalition of Mobility (UCOM), the Scott County Transportation Coalition (SCTC), the Laukka/494 Transportation Management Organization (TMO) and others. Despite the obvious local interests of the southern suburban communities adjacent to this corridor, there is a recognized need to provide a support organization to promote the improvements through the southern portion of Minneapolis to offset the growing organization of opposition in the southern neighborhoods of Minneapolis. The City of Richfield recognizes the impact the related construction of the upgrading would have on their community. However, they also recognize the greater negative impact of doing nothing or delaying the inevitable. I believe the original intent of inviting the City of Eagan to participate in this initial organizational meeting was to try and garner as much interest and support as possible in the early stages. From Eagan's perspective, as a community in northern Dakota County, I feel it would be in our subregional best interest to support this organization. However, further review would have to determine if there would be sufficient benefit/conflict of providing proposed financial support for this organization in lieu of our own transportation issues and concerns. I don't believe that Eagan should provide technical support in lieu of the ready availability of professional consultant services. The extent of subregional or inner community political support should be left to the discretion of the City Council and yourself. From the perspective of a neighboring community and northern Dakota County city, the appropriate positive support would be worthwhile. a3C) They have scheduled their next meeting to be held at 7:30 a.m. Thursday, March 9th at Burnsville City Hall to discuss the creation of a mission statement and possible identification of foundation goals to be announced during a press release associated with the Governor's visit to Burnsville during that City's "Capitol for a Day" scheduled for 11:45 a.m., Wednesday, March 15th at the Burnsville VFW. At the next scheduled meeting of this committee, they will also attempt to formalize an identifiable organizational name. Attached are handouts distributed at this recent meeting. I would like to discuss with you the necessity and/or appropriateness of Eagan's representation at future meetings. Please let me know if you would like to have me or anyone else attend this next scheduled meeting. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/ jf 23 � The following comments may help you in organizing your task force: a Try to have the Task Force represent as broad a background as possible. The SCTC has members from the cities, county, townships, chambers of commerce, industrial commissions, recreational attractions and most importantly the citizens of the community. It is the grass -root involvement that makes this Coalition go. * Clearly establish your goals and objectives. Everyone in the Task Force should be saying the same thing. Previous organizations have failed due to internal fighting over which project or which segment of a project should have top priority. We have three projects as our goals and we refuse to prioritize them. Whatever project needs our attention at a particular time, we give it our attention. + Do things right. Don't cut corners or reduce costs if at all possible. A well organized meeting or a professional -like publication is long remembered. It is also a positive memory -not a negative memory as could be the case if things are not handled well. f It costs to do things right. If you don't have the money to accomplish a large number of items, do less, but do them to the highest standard feasible. Our budget is $60,000-$80,000 per year. • Keep people informed. An informed person is your best supporter. + Support other organizations, if you can. Hopefully, they will be able to support you. Our philosophy is to support increased transportation funding State-wide. While we are very parochial in support of our projects, we firmly believe that this philosophy will ultimately benefit our projects. + Keep your legislators involved. We meet with them approximately every two weeks. • Work with Mn/DOT and other agencies. Ask for their input and help. Don't demand that things should be done. Working with someone is much easier than against. • Members must make a firm commitment. We have a Work Group/Executive Committee established that meets every two weeks for approximately two hours to review activities involving the Coalition. We then assign workload to the work group members for the upcoming two weeks. If you don't have members that can faithfully commit considerable time to the organization, it will not hold together over a long per d of tim_ C) 3 �- i Is •• �� m..r +•i . V," amii V� r>~ W� Uma it ems, 1997 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 pw ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ IS W so IL 8 J V O 4 W y� 0z ? O J 6�(� H=Fes', p 0 V WW 00 yy T - D miN. . rPreliminary Project Schedule M6 m—rs04 Ul0.r110M1 01 h0n000rIHr00 - M011000MM1 Lown" W W ¢ 8 SCOPING AND 0 ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION O W DRAFT O ENVIRONMENTAL � MPACT A ATEMENT ri ... Figure yd Nam) 4 GEOMETRIC DESIGN v 3 a u v u _ 3 AND RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION so IL 8 J d 7 6 O! ? O yty IL 12 yy T sa.eruala�s h95Www�lerl� . D miN. . rPreliminary Project Schedule (Schedule Is tentative and will change periodically) m—rs04 Ul0.r110M1 01 h0n000rIHr00 - M011000MM1 Lown" ... Figure yd Nam) 4 x x n a. w M " Mil kA " " bt " G " " M MW TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF EXISTING VOLUMES ON 1-35W AND PROJECTED CONSTRAINED TRAFFIC DEMAND IN 2010 (1) Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation (1986 Counts) (2) At Franklin Avenue (Includes traffic from both I -35W North and T.N. 65) (3) See Addendum to Technical Memorandum 19 Load Point 1986%&1 2010%' % Change, Loaa roinc azs¢• LY_X s= North of 172,800 2260400 318 North of 7,200 10,000 398 Lake Street(2) Lake Street(2) South of 143,100 217,800 528 South of 5,660 90800 738 60th Street. 60th Street South of 87,600 138,800 588 South of 31800 61250 648 66th Street 66th Street �► South of I-494 98,400 178,800 828 South of I-494 4,170 8,050 938 -�ow ,800 7�0i At Ninnesota 4,150 7,200 738 a River , River (1) Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation (1986 Counts) (2) At Franklin Avenue (Includes traffic from both I -35W North and T.N. 65) (3) See Addendum to Technical Memorandum 19 ►. rFAAIf 11 1!NNW VAM TABLE 1 A.M. PEAK ENTRANCE RAMP DELAY NON)EMBER, 1986 I A.M. Peak Hour ITotal Time Metered I--------- --------------------------------------------- IDelay I Maximum 1 for NOV Metered Average I Maximum Delay I Avg. Ramp Traffic Metering Total I Queue per NORTHBOUND I Veh. Volume Volume Rate Delay*1 Length+ Vehicle Entrance Ramps 1(min.) (veh.) (veh.) (sec/veh) (hrs) I (veh.) (min.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- pakota Cty Rd 421 1.9 138 1101 3.3 4.1 I 44 (50) 2.4 purnsville Pkwy 1 3.3 356 10.1 9.5 1 29 (18) 6.1 wy 13 Loop 1 5.4 454 7.9 1.0 1 65 (22) 11.1 .(�iwy 13 Dirct Legl 1.4 189 362 9.9 .5 1 18 (30) 3.0 (Cliff Rd (122nd)1 1.4 369 9.8 .4 1 24 (20) 4.7 82nd Street 1 0.9 -- 277 13.0 4.2 1 11 (18) 3.0 I-494 Loop 1 0.6 -- 497 7.2 4.9 1 15 (18) 1.5 I-494 Direct Legl 0.3 -- 109 33.0 0.6 I 5 (35) 2.1 76th Street 1 0.5 41 165 21.8 1.5 1 8 (16) 2.9 66th Street 1 3.0 56 142 25.4 7.0 1 17 (28) 7.3 Lyndale Avenue 1 4.5 -- 194 18.6 14.7 1 19 (18) 6.5 60th Street 1 4.3 -- 196 18.4 14.2 1 22 (20) 7.3 Diamond Lake Rd 1 4.1 29 236 15.3 16.0 1 21 (21) 5.7 35th Street 1 2.2 -- 403 8.9 15.0 1 20 (18) 3.9 SOUTHBOUND Entrance Ramps 31st Street 10.9 -- 322 11.2 4.9 1 21 (20) 2.1 36th Street 1 0.6 -- 375 9.6 3.9 I 12 (14) 1.8 46th Street 1 0.5 -- 389 9.3 3.0 1 8 (20) 1.2 Diamond Lake'Rd 1 0.4 -- 280 12.9 1.9 1 7 (28) 1.6 66th Street# 1 0.5 -- 108 13.9 1.8 I 7 (25) 2.4 * Based on average delay per vehicle and metered traffic volume measured in vehicle -hours. + The number in parentheses is the approximate storage capacity of the entrance ramp (in vehicles) without spilling -back into the upstream streets/intersection. # Meter was in operation only from 7:16-7:41 a.m. 0 OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 March 1, 1989 Re: Pond LP -55, Request To Raise Existing Controlled Water Elevation Dear Property Owner: VIC EllISON Mv/a THOMAS ELAN DAVID K GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHER THOMAS HEDGES Ok AmK1bhulq EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE citya With the recent development of the Wilderness Ponds Addition east of ChesMar Drive and north of Dunberry Lane within the Chas Mar Additions, a controlled storm water sewer outlet was installed from Pond LP -55 located immediately east of Oak Leaf Circle in the Ches Mar 4th Addition. Attached to this letter you will find a copy of the mailing list and map showing the property owners who are being sent this information. As you can see, there presently exists two major depressions located between Dunberry Lane and Wilderness Curve on the north and Oak Leaf Circle and Oak Chase Lane on the east. The City has received various comments and concerns regarding the proper long-term water elevation for these two major wetland depressions. With the recent development of the Wilderness Ponds Addition on the north, this storm water outlet lowered the previous flooded water elevation from approximately 923.0 to 916.0. Most recent comments made to City Hall have requested consideration to raise the controlled elevation to its previous level of approximately 923.0. Additional research pertaining to water quality issues has now been added to the long history of discussion pertaining to the controlled elevations for these wetlands. Therefore, the City would like to invite all interested property owners (or their representative) to an informative neighborhood meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m.,, Wednesday, March 8, 1989, in the Eagan Council Chambers. A review of the history and the various concerns pertaining to the water elevations will be discussed along with water quality impacts of various elevations and an explanation of various processes available to pursue a desired change in the existing water elevation for Pond LP -55. THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY OL Y7 March 1, 1989 Page 2 Also enclosed please find a synopsis of the history associated with these pond elevations as prepared by the City's consulting engineer as well as typical letters on file that represent various perspectives and desires regarding the referenced pond elevations. Because of the complexity of the issue and related aspects, it will be difficult to discuss this individually with interested property owners. Therefore, it is hoped that this neighborhood meeting will provide an opportunity to present all this information in a comprehensive manner. Therefore, if you have any interest, I strongly encourage you to attend this meeting. Sincerely, , -0 Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer MILyor'6 City Council Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Enclosures DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY I.D. NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEG. DATE DELETE 10-17103-050-01 BRUCE•P MILLER R' ._% -Cl F• & L'i NTH I A C GRALTON 01 01 000000 N 4520 OAKLEAF CIR ?77 DUUBERRY LN 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-17103-060-01 RONALD B & NORMA NESHEIM 01 01 000000 N 4522 OAK LEAF CIR 4e"1 CAI' L'FiASi L;7 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-17103-170-01 PETER W & MAUREEN SORENSEN 01 01 861030 N 1285 DUNBERRY LN U•.{ Hi:,S'E LN •01 02 000000 N EGGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-17103-180-01 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DWIGHT F & CAROLE A WATSON 01 01 000000 N 1283 DUNBERRY LN DATE 01 02 000000 N EABAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N RANSACT:I•7N% R745 PROPERT% I.B. 10-171[•4 ;.0• -.:2 NAME AND ADDRESS' RECORD PISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE BEG. DATE DELETE R' ._% -Cl F• & L'i NTH I A C GRALTON 01 01 871 110 N ?77 DUUBERRY LN 01 02 N Eu =ON MN 55122 01 03 N FR_DERTC E & LINI`A BUDDLE 01 01 000040 N 4e"1 CAI' L'FiASi L;7 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-5350' -c -50-02 RICHARD L & DIANE E NEY 01 O1 000000 N U•.{ Hi:,S'E LN 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MM 55123 01 03 000000 N RANSACTION. R751 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY I.D. NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEG. DATE DELETE 10-53501-060-02 JAMES C & VEONA MARTIN 01 01 000000 N 4503 OAK CHASE LN 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-84275-250-02 GERALD R BULL 01 01 870202 N A585 SLATER RD #104 01 02 N LAGAN MN 55122 01 03 N 70-84275-260-02 WILDERNESS PONDS INC 01 01 870202 N 412c QUEBEC AVE #202 01 02 N NEW HOPE MN 55427 01 03 N 10-84275-2-70•-:12 WILDFRNESS PONDS INC 01 01 870202 R 4724 OLIEFEC AVE 0202 di 42 N NEW NOFE MN 55427 01 03 N SINSACT.IONs R755 PROPERTY I.D. 10-84275-280-02 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEC. TIMOTHY J & MARGARET MURPHY 01 01 1266 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 10-84275-290-02 000000 N CHRISTOPHER & SUZANN COLBY 01 01 1270 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 EAGANs MN 55123 01 03 10-84275-300-02 RALPH E & DOROTHY A ERICKSON 01 01 1274 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 EAGAN MN 55124 01 03 10-84275-310-02 JOHN E JR & LECUETTA FLYNN 01 01 1278 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 F_AM)AN MN 55123 01 03 ANSACT7Or.: -2755 "ROPER7V I D. N{BACT701j: F':. •- 'ROPERTV I.D- 0-1710 4-1 G '---r 1 N"^:9E AND ADDRE88 RECORD °_!: r - .r"- LE•"ENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS WME AND A,^.Dc =SS TYPE BE&. :_O:- [ k F<FNAE L SFANDE 03 01 • 7r '. WI'_1`�RNESS CLIR 01 02 Er .AN M!J E'' • %� C1 03 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEC. EVERETT I & JOYCE TOLLERUD 01 5240 11TH AVE S 01 MPLS MN 55417 01 0-17103-200-01 JAMES & GAIL OLIJNEK 01 1279 DUNBERRY LN 01 EAGAN MN 55123 01 0-17103-200-01 '24D DATE DELETE 880809 N N N 880908 N N N 880301 N N N 880927 N N N DATE DELETE 841327 N 14 r' DATE DELETE 01 000000 N 02 000000 N 03 000000 _ N 01 000000 N 02 000000 N 03 000000 N �y, 1 . � • • • Sl �y _ r ,r P � � • QI , 1 •4r r • / • „ � � •r VL V LANE L• 999 1 • w 1 = OII-02 Lip w INNM •• Ca sy n n a •, L r, Lr\ 11 M • WW •• •s r _ \O •r' rr• -_ BYDDLB ' Q YII1 / ' M! • ' ,'�' S w D ` 7o-"auD A/ i 1 *I I1 • I t • - / uait40 Ak ; / A r �„� nleaiurl no • i O dw .�� ' 1 10 N / ' -� C ' i 05, LORZ ti , .• N 12k D. Bonestroo OEM Rosene "Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects November 16, 1988 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert On G. RWesrA4 PE !Atli A Gutlon, PE TMmrs W. PLRnon. P.E. 1116M RoeerrL RE NOWO W. FOM RE M hW C Lp%IL PE JAeplr C Andu k PE. GW Wd C aAUMX PE J m R. WIY4 PE aadlM A LanWg. PE Jon A bxff& , P.E. aAaWM P. Anile PE WdWdE%n PE MAk A HY PE 41thA Eatln. PE Jt/re, C ohm PE Ted r PAK RE Ask R. RW & ►E Go R. 00k. ►E W We t RararrWn. PE NOW C R,dxt, AIA lhW E Noyes PE NOM L Ph11Wk. PE Thr E Anym PE Mom 4 SdiWddL PE 0add 0. Ladm PS Ha A Swimra PE Marvin L SorWIL ►E 0~1 EdW mn, PE am A Seip PE Nft1cawm PE MRk a Wtlds RE CWb AE - Im AL Pawebky IWWn kl 01mn Sum AL Bwrb% CPA Hes Pond LP -55 and LP -55A Outlet City Project No. 448 - Our File No. 49360 Dear Tom, I have attempted to list the sequence of events for the above project which are listed below: 1.) May 1970 - Aerial Survey performed by Mark Hurd. Elevation Pond LP -55 918.3 and LP -55A 914.5 (Ney's Pond). 2.) March 1978 - Ches Mar 4th and 5th Addition were developed and 15' storm •ever was constructed into Pond LP -55 at elevation 918.55 which is also approximate water level. 3.) December 28, 1984 - Dick Ney presented letter to Mayor and Council ex- plaining the high water level experienced in Pond LP -55A (pond in Ney's backyard) is the result of the high water level in Pond LP -55. He ex- plained by controlling Pond LP -55 at an elevation of 918 or lower would stabilize Pond LP -55A. The average water levels in Pond LP -55 and LP -55A in 1984 were 923.0. 4.) July 16, 1985 - A public hearing was held for Project No. 448 - Pond LP -55 Outlet. This project proposed constructing a storm sever outlet for both Pond LP -55 and LP -55A to Pond LP -54. The controlled elevation for Pond LP -55 was assumed to be 920 while LP -55A was assumed to be 916. Easements were required from 3 platted lots in Chas Mar 5th Addition and the un - platted parcel to the north. Trunk area assessments were proposed against the two unplatted parcels to the north. Property owners to the north ob- jected to assessments and granting easements. Council closed public hear- ing and requested staff to revise preliminary report. It was also felt DNR should investigate water levels and give their input. 5.) October 7. 1985 - I prepared a letter to Tom Colbert explaining the re- sults of the DNR establishing NOW's for each pond. The DNR recommended the NOW for Pond LP -55 be 923.3 while LP -55A be 922.8. The existing water levels at that time in Pond LP -55 and LP -55A were 922.9 and 923.0, respectively. Page 1. 25 2335 West Highway 36 a St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-6364600 5.) October 29. 1985 - Neighborhood meeting was held with effected property owners to discuss DNR results. Dick Ney objected to the elevations estab- lished by the DNR that they were too high. 6.) December 3. 1985 - A formal public hearing was held where Project No. 448E was discussed and three options were presented. Option I provided for a storm sever outlet from Pond LP -55A (NVL 918.5) to LP -55 (NVL 918.0) to LP -54. Option II provided for only storm outlet from LP -55 (NUL 918) to LP -54. In each case Option I and II crossed the unplatted parcels to the north at the best location from a construction standpoint. Option III provided a storm sever outlet from Pond LP -55 and LP -55A along the east- erly line of the unplatted parcel to the north to LP -54. Option III was extremely costly because of overdepth and additional pipe. No one could agree on course of action so staff was directed to restudy project and develop plans for the property to the north so the storm sever construc- tion between Pond LP -55 and LP -54 could accommodate future development. 7.) April 29. 1986 - A neighborhood meeting was held with effected property owners to update project status. Based on recent development plans for the unplatted property, an alignment was established and it was stated a pipe from LP -55 to LP -54 would be built controlling Pond LP -55 at 918. Dick Hey again stated an NVL for Pond LP -55 at 918 was too high and should be 916.0. 8.) November 18. 1986 - Bids were received and a contract was awarded based on constructing a storm sever pipe from Pond LP -55 to LP -54. The outlet pipe from Pond LP -55 was built to elevation 916.0. The water elevation in Pond LP -55 on October 20, 1986 was 923.7. It should be noted the control out- let NH for Pond LP -55 does have boards and its NUL can be easily adjusted. 9.) December 1986 - Storm sever was constructed per plan. 91'..0) C (917.1) Presently, Pond LP -55 and LP -55A are at elevation 916.4 and 918.0 respective- ly. I have also attached certain letters which you may find helpful. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTRO 0, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOCIATES, INC. c� Nark A. Hanson NAH:li Page 2. 25 ��Lk7_) MINNESOTA RECEIVED NOV 2 9 1988 4L DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT SOIL Aron WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS November 28, 1988 Tom Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: Farmington Professional Building P.O. Box 129 621 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 4638626 As requested, I inspected Pond LP -55 and attempted to determine the pond water quality at different depths. The Walker model indicates that, although the water quality will improve as the water depth increases, the pond will be eutrophic regardless of the water depth. In addition, a change in depth is not likely to affect the water clarity in the pond significantly. In a shallow pond, the nutrient levels will be high but the growth of plants such as Cattails and Reed Canary grass will shade out algae and duckweed, thereby limiting their growth. As water depth increases, the decrease in nutrient concentrations will tend to reduce algae and duckweed growth and allow the water clarity to be good. The main advantage in increasing the pond depth will be to reduce nutrient loading todownstreamwater bodies. The Walker model indicates that nutrient loading to Thomas Lake can be reduced by about nine pounds per year if the pond depth is increased to six feet ( an increase of four feet). to cdPv 9.10.0 Further increases in pond depth would have only minimal impacts on the nutrient retention in the pond. Another consideration with raising the pond level is the feasibility of maintaining the water level between rainstorms in dry years. Most ponds in Minnesota are influenced by groundwater flows. During dry conditions water typically flows from lakes and ponds into the ground water. Because ground water levels drop during drought conditions, pond and lake levels also decrease. This may expose mud flats during time periods between rainstorms. The degree of pond level drop will depend in part on the difference between the pond level and the groundwater table. Raising the pond level significantly above the groundwater table ( which is probably very close to the long term normal pond level), may create some aesthetic problems. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 2 4k� The existing tree line around the pond suggests that the normal pond level was about two to three feet above the current level. Maintaining the pond level seven feet above the current level, therefore, may be very difficult. If you have any questions regarding this assessment of LP -55 please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, John Barten District Limnologist December 28, 1984 ffiyor B. Blomquist e/o Thomas Hedges, Eagan City Ball and Eagan City Council Members Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Bagan, Finnesota 55122 Be: Construct an outlet to pond LP55 to maintain a level that will eliminate the continual flooding of lots 49 5 and 69 Block two, Uak Chase Second Addition. Dear Mayor Blomquist and Council- Members: We are requestinn the construction of an outlet from pond LF55 as pro- posed on Eagan's Master Storm Sewer Plan. Since the construction and development of Ches Mar 4th and 5th Additions in 1978 we have had con- tinual flooding of our property. Pond LP55 is approximately 200 feet west of the pond adjacent to our property. This pond was not recognized on ]agan's Master Ponding Flan when Ches Mar was developed. We discussed with Mr. Rosene (at the June 1977 Planning Commission meeting on Ches Mar Development and several times later) the potential problems that could occur when storm run off water is Piped into a shallow pond with no outlet. We were assured there w uld be no problems. Compounding the small holding capacity of the ponds was the lack of erosion control in the Ches Mar development as the hillside washed down, more fill was dumped in the washouts only to washout again. Mr. Colbert's October 1980 letter to Tollefson Builders and Gabbert De- velopment Co. recognizes the flooding, the siltation and the altered per- colation of the pond. Our letter to the Mayor and City Council dated July 6, 1981 chronologizes our effort to get some relief from these problems. At our proddin .the city has been monitoring the levels of both ponds aince April 1964. The ponds, as surveyed by the city, maintain approxi- mately the same elevation. The original topographical map of the area before develo:ment showed the elevation of LP55 at -.18.3 and the pond adjacent to Oak Chase at 914.6 feet. Since the Ches Mar storm sewer run off was piped into pond LP55, both ponds have risen, floodinc wooded areas. The pond flooding our lots has been pumped twice and both times the pond continued to rise after pumping stopped, even during a lone dry spell. Pond LP55 decreased during this time, hence, the conclusion water from pond LP55 is seeping into the pond on/adjacent to our property. The city engineers agree the seepage between the two ponds is preventing our pond from receding. ;Q � The natural treeline on our property follows the elevation contour 918. It is imperative that pond LP�5 be maintained at 918 or lower to protect the trees on our property. The Master Storm Sewer Plan sets the planned outflow elevation of LP55 at 920, but didn't plan on the seepage between ponds. Even at elevation 918 there will be times during heavy run off that elevation 918 will be exceeded. Since the floodinc into the trees began, 66 trees from approximately 10 to 58 inches in circumference have eat her tipped over or died or both on lot 5 alone. Also, one tree that tipped over narrowly missed a parked car in front of the garage and another dead tree fell on the deck behind the house. There are many more dead ones that will have to be taken down to avoid falling on the houses on lots 5 and 6. This is a serious ?r oblem and must be corrected. This past summer the water was up to the fill behind both houses on lots 5 and 6. On lots 5 and 6, 90 feet of the 180 foot deep lots were flooded. Since the temporary pump was removed in September 1984 the pond has flooded to within 20 feet of the fill again. This 7e aves us no backyard and based on the last seven years, continual rising waters and more dead trees. The pond will have to be pumped again this spring. The storm sewer outfall on pond LP55 was as much as 20 inches under water this summer bef::re pumping. If that conditon remains into minter the storm sewer would freeze shut causing some real .roblems in the streets it drains during a winter rain or thaw and durin7 the siring thaw. The problems mentioned above should never have occured with Roper city engineering- and supervision of the developers. The initial storm sewer engineering was inadequate in not recognizing the volumn of run off, the seepage between ponds, and the holding, capacities of the ponds. We have been very patient the last seven years and feel it is time this problem is corrected. If the LP55 outlet is constructed at elevation 918 or lower this would help stabilize the ponds, allow us to use our backyards again (a garden, playhouse, etc.) and save the remaining trees. It is very important to us to stabilize the pond as soon as possible. We will be waitin_ to hear of your plan to accomplish this. Sincerely, �4z�� 4497 oak Chase Lane ,_zagan, t:innesota 55123 lton D. Shean 4491 Oak Chase Lane Eagan, Minnesota 55123 James Martin !(503 Oak Chase Lane Fagan, Minnesota 55123 to: Mr. Rich Hefti, Eagan Public Works Department X 4 1 J October 28, 1985 Mr. Richard M. Hefti, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Mr. Hefti: Re: Storm Water Outlet for Pond LP -55 6 LP -55A; City Project 0448. After discussion with you on this date regarding City Project #448, we concluded that we are against any project which would either: 1. Damage the environment (trees, landscape, etc.) of our property. 2. Effect any additional assessment. � 4 LZ.9) The water level of Pond LP-55(on our property) is fine as is, and we have no interest in making any changes. It should be noted and under- stood that jointly we own in excess of one-half of the property surrounding the Pond LP -55. Sincerely, James S Gail Olijnek 1279 Dunberry Lane Lot 20, Block 1 Ches Mar Fourth Addition JAO/go John i Tarilynn Radford 1277 Dunberry Lane Lot 10, Block 2 Ches Mar Fifth Addition cc:homas Colbert, Director of Public Works lark Hanson, Consulting Engineer DA KENO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY C0UNCIIM24BER.S FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 6, 1989 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR MARCH 7, 1989 I,r G :.r: w'. In the informative section of your packet there are pages numbered 228 and 227, in that order. Please replace that page with the attached numbered 224 through 228,. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City'Administrator NOISE POLICY STATEMENT As one of America's most.important national assets, it is imperative that the nation's system of airports is prepared to meet current and future transportation needs. Unfortunately, that system is in a shameful state of readiness. Straining to meet current transportation needs, today's airport system will be unfit to carry the burden of future transportation demands unless wide-ranging measures are undertaken immediately. Deregulation of aviation, coupled with an expanding economy, has dramatically increased the number of flights. This increase in flight frequency, coupled with the urbanization and suburbanization of land surrounding airports, has also dramatically increased the number of people impacted by aircraft noise. The millions of Americans affected daily by aircraft noise has magnified the political pressure to constrain operations at existing airports at the same time the growth in flights is dictating that airport capacity be expanded. It has become obvious that the existing airport system cannot handle the dual demands of increasing airport capacity and reducing the impact of aircraft noise. The aviation industry has proposed a "technofix", the implementation of an all Stage 3 fleet, in order to alleviate the aircraft noise problem. while quieter aircraft will make a positive impact -on -the problem, it will not resolve it. "Quieter noise" can not compensate for the frequency of overflights that degrade the quality of life for those living under flight paths. The Federal, Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed the implementation of a system of new regional jetports. These new aviation hubs would be located in strategic areas across the country to facilitate growth in the aviation system. The jetports would be located outside urban areas with appropriate zoning to preclude inappropriate development around the jetports. Urban areas would be linked to the jetports through the use of high speed rail and freeways. While the FAA has proposed this system, it has not done enough to see that it will come to fruition. The FAA policy of only granting funding to current airport proprietors works against the establishment of new jetports. The National Organization to Insure a Sound -controlled Environment (NOISE), feels the establishment of new regional jetports is one of the long-term solutions to the nation's. capacity and aircraft noise problems. In order to bring about such a system, the FAA needs to change its funding policy so that governmental jurisdictions, other than those that currently operate airports, can qualify for funding. Existing airports should also implement other noise mitigation measures that would bring relief to noise impacted people. These noise mitigation measures can be implemented without decreasing airport capacity. Land use planning should also be considered as a means of mitigating the effect of aircraft noise. Land use planning is best done on a local level and NOISE strongly supports the pre-eminent role of local jurisdictions in any land use decisions. Local airport operators should also retain their prerogative to implement noise mitigation procedures. NOISE believes that aircraft noise mitigation and expansion of the nation's aviation capacity need not be mutually exclusive goals. Aircraft noise reduction advocates and aviation industry officials can and should work together to bring aviation service into the 21st Century. Listed below are NOISE's recommendations for achieving an aviation system that is capable of handling transportation needs and is compatible with the environment: 1) The FAA should recommend, establish criteria for and fund a system of new regional jetports that would reduce the current strain on the nation's aviation system and be able to handle future demand. Local jurisdictions should construct and operate these jetports. The jetports should be constructed in areas where the noise impact would be minimal and where local jurisdictions are 3 1, willing to impose zoning restrictions thatwould minimize future impacts. — Rapid transit systems should be encouraged by the government and aviation industry as a means of linking the new regional jetports to metropolitan areas. 2) All additions to the current air carrier fleet should be Stage 3 aircraft. The manufacture or importation of Stage 2 aircraft for operation in the United States should be halted. 3) All Stage 2 aircraft operations in the United States should end by a date mutually agreed upon by NOISE and the Federal Government. 4) Incentives should be made available to facilitate the conversion to a Stage 3 fleet. 5) The FAA should establish a Stage 3.5 fleet deadline. Stage 3.5 should be approximately 3 to 4 decibels quieter than Stage 3. 6) Special procedures for evening flights should be considered at airport locations with noise problems. These may include night curfews or restriction of evening flights to quieter aircraft. The FAA should comply with the local noise mitigation procedures. MINUTES OF REGULAIC:1BETING BE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL B�'@11$t:1k�lpiESOTA FEBRUARY 21, 1999 A regular meeting ofs#' Council was held on Tuesday, .: •:..: February 21, 1989, at 6:3 '"p�::'t�le;.gagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and dinncilei�nbers Wachter, Egan, Gustafson and McCrea. Also presagt were;City Administrator Tom Hedges, Public Works Director T-#�::Colbe;:•t, Community Development Director Dale Runkle and QAttlrssei7ames Sheldon. r •q-,4 At the request of the applicant, Item E. under New Business (Conditional Use Permit - Naegele Outdoor Advertising) was continued. Wachter moved, GustaL644i*seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All votid%1" ' 7rar.,•. February 7. 1989, Counczliiiiie'r Egan requested an addition on page 9, paragraph 5, to ilk Mike Nicky as being present at the meeting. Egan also requested a change on page 12, paragraph 6, correcting Mr. Wagner's first name to •Ralph'. Mayor Ellison request,#:�t#�{t-tzti on page 7, paragraph 31 to the motion regarding the massaije:iotdiriarige to state •The matter was continued to review proposed alts*pati :g,• Councilmember McCrea requested a nge on page 14, paragraph 3. The first sentence should read 'Councib'kember McCrea stated the City should remain in the role of monitoring and over -sight and should not be in the role of creating, and that the present policy could be taken and modified to address the City's concerns.• She stated 'The City could set greater specifications and that it would be easier to review others' work than your own work;:::.' Egan moved, McCrea se430AdA4t:::Eba. lotion to approve the minutes for the February 7, 1989t meeting meeting as amended. All voted in favor. Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989... .:.. ...3:.::>::: STATE REPRESENTATIVE W SRABE W,."C LEGISLATIVE COORDINATOR LI8 HITT WaR►L DISTRICT 38 Margaret Schreiner of tbe"`!letropolitan Council gave a brief presentation. State Representative Art Seaberg presented a brief legislative update on property taxes, crime, drugs and environment. Liz Witt, LMC Coordi-a-at:t;dsrisnted a document with property tax recommendations (Seep:<?:::::: Mayor Ellison asked Repreaetativ.Seaberg what the City could do to make the tax burden fair@;::..Repeentative Seaberg responded that the City should let t#:pa�afi}: be known. KATIE OPATRNY/EAGAN FIRE PBEVRNTIOM POSTER WINNER Chief Southorn recognized Katie Opatrny, Eagan's Fire Prevention poster winner, and stated she had received an honorable mention in the State Wide Fire Prevention Poster Contest. OF Councilmember Egan for a new candidate and Council. MANAGEMENT 3ARB AGUE City should readvertise make recommendations to the Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to accept the letter of resignation of Barb Agne from the Water Quality Management Committee and seek a replacement by advertising for applications for the position. All voted in, favor, ............... Item A. Personnel It. 1. Clerk/typist. a. Maintenance Facility Clerk/typist. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Cristina Marlette subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. b. Police and Fire Department Clei:X;(typist. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Bradt}:se.:mer and Patricia Peterson for clerk/typist positions in .'.#;e:::aiii fire departments, subject to the successful completion. of-trie Cf�tyTs' physical examination requirements. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUT:::::: ........:.:::E$... . February 21, 1989::::`••':=::E::::a:. 2. Street/Equipment l S ntenance 4k kkera. It was recommended to appr-weA a hiring of Dean Robinson and William Hoium for street/equipment division maihtenanoe positions, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. 3. Contract Recyclin It was recommended to apprt" thO-5::30ontract with Kris Hagemann as a recycling specialist for the.f4ty. X. Item B. It was recommended to approve the plumbers and water softener licenses as presented. Item C. Proiect 519. Final Acceptance (Town Centre Street Lights) It was recommended to "alit ti tke:.;the final acceptance of Project 519 (Town Centre - Street It Project hearing was recommended to receive th 527 (Lexington Square - Storm to be held March 21, 1989. final assessment roll for Sewer) and schedule a public Item E. Project 519.:.geo di' e:.gi.nal•.Assessment Rol /Order Pu Hearing (Town CentreE__:iil:r::: It was recommended to receive the::fjnal assessment roll for Project 519 (Town Centre - Street:::Light-A) and schedule a public hearing to be held on March 21, -1*09. AdditionItem F. Contract 89-02. Re It was recommended to receive the;.U.Lds for Contract 89-02 (Clearview Addition - Streets) and awa#*the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, McNamara Contractififin the amount of $80,542.00. It was recommended to receive the -Bids for Contract 89-04 (Timberline and Well No. 1 - Inspection and Repair) and award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Layne Minnesota in amount of $27,677.00. the the Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 It was recommended to approve the resolution restricting parking on Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. It was recommended to rece1, !p thcfj*.�P.Ids for Contract 88-32 (Well No. 12 - Pumphouse and the contract to the 'ffglbW--.N-&lders, Inc. in the amount of lowest responsible bidder $2418000.00. Item J. It was recommended t6i."iftpg.ove the plans and specifications for Contract 88-28 (Fire Parking Lot Improvements) and authorize the advertisement to be held at 11:00 a.m., Thursday, March 16,, 1984:* Wachter moved, Gustaf ....ft .. d the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda presented and authorize their implementation. All voted * -'in favor. PROJECT 531/LRXINGTDN AVENUE (STREETS & UTILITIES) Public Works Director.To.m.Cglbert introduced the matter to the Council. A representative.��. 4. introduced and explained the nature of the improvement'*'pi*61*ii-di:::::*::iW::::iiiE'*ated it was expected the project would begin at the compift--ion 0;E -.-'the Pilot Knob project and that the through traffic would W.*.'Aeto&*d onto Pilot Knob. He also stated that the cross traffic wo'U-;d be�:""'*intained. Mr. Colbert further explained the easement acquisitins. Bob Rosene presented the utility improvements associated with the project. He also presented the proposed assessment rates and showed the areas of assessment on overhead exhibits. Councilmember Egan had questions "arding the assessments for certain areas. Mr. Colbert_,*.VLA#e. d.- .....t4g..assessments for those areas. Mr. Rosene explained cost sharing for the project. Mr. Colbert stated a water stud' was being conducted to measure the effect of the project. Bill Hanson, 3876 Westwood Lane, was concerned regarding the lowering of the road bed in his location. He also had concerns Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 regarding noise. Mr. Colbert: jtated thai:-;.kbe road bed would not be significantly lowered. Mr. H$ ap:...c gq i ried the location of the bike trail. Be asked how far from taty line would work be done. Be also questioned where the utiliiiii:46uld be located. Mr. Colbert stated an additional five feet would be acquired for the right-of-way. Lisa Goulet, 3590 B1 Public Works Director Tom Richard Weinberger, 3707 sole assessment on his side of acquired. Public Works Direcic the unique drainage on the p his side of the street. He fur notified of acquisitions. w assessments worked. the assessment process. Way `':.questioned why he was the :reef; He asked if land would be albi�t reported that because of #Ea:fo$s the sole assessment on :a£ed that the owners would be Mayor Ellison questioned if the County would have any neighborhood meetings. Mr. Colbert stated no. Mayor Ellison observed that perhaps it should be do#te::1n, the future. Mark Simpson, 3980 Lexingt assessed twice. He informed the exceeded past assessments. Publ commented that he would resea;c discrepancies. He stated that.*.' 6640i:8outh, claimed he was cil:,tAmt the current assessment iCS'ector Tom Colbert ::8iatter and resolve any ojects had different costs. Jim Ruhe, 3708 Falcone Way, asked who determined what ponding areas were to be drained. Mr. Colbert stated it depended on the nature of the pond. John Thiele, 3692 Falcois+i£?RtiR�d the Council that the developer had told him that :'a33-' =assas:�neIits were paid when he purchased his house. He stated the ftilderx broke many promises. He felt the improvements were not need anc6tated that he could not afford the assessments. Mr. Colbert::--:atatid* that his assessment was $890.00, not $10,000.00. "" Lucille Webster, 4030 South Lexington, questioned the need for a bike path. She had concerns regarding the drainage and suggested that the trails be year round. Mr. Colbert stated that the erosion could be cleaned up. Councilmember Gustafson eigained why the City does not maintain the trails year round. Mike Bolling, 3856 West#i t�.*ji:%�e fti l d the road level. He had concerns regarding safety and**`-''rei#iiested"a':barrier. Be asked what affect there would be on the landscaping♦:?.A representative from Bonestroo explained the landscaping. Putchea Labino, Homeowners' Association representative, asked why all of the lots weren't listed under the assessments. Mr. Colbert Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINOTE,$,:::::::.,:,.;, February 21, 1989 stated that single family': idents.Y�j�e not being assessed for the road improvements unless tlYeji: d <s jkt access. He further stated that others had pre -paid. Ms:" k€iia questioned the assessment method. Mr. Colbert explained the assessment method. Ms. Labino requested postponement on a decision regarding the matter. Luella Seech, 4040 SoutJA.Jexington,, objected to the bike path and asked how close the b��F?�::...... * property lines. Mr. �l�s#k#�#t be to pe ty Colbert stated there was AO`'Ba;:N an but that they could not be inside of the property lines. :... Joe Raspi, 3579 Bluejay,::r sti0. why the improvement was not all done at one timeHe h. ;::woi arn;� ` egarding the assessments and noise. He felt the wideniiiq was noo-'necessary at the present time. Councilmember McCrea explained that Eagan was still 458 undeveloped and that growth must be anticipated. Mr. Colbert stressed that the money was not available to complete the project all at one time. City Attorney James Sheldon explained the legal aspects of assessments. Paul Larson, 3635 Blii. y :;had concerns regarding the ponding and the water outlet. Mr. CoYtieltated they were only proposed locations. Mark Haze, 3609 BluejaeGEriiied the grade of Duckwood and Lexington. Mr. Colbert sta'1i►8s lowered about 6 feet. Bob Warneke, 3945 Westbury, questioned the lighting, speed limit and crosswalks. Mr. Colbert stated that lighting was installed only at major intersections, that the Department of Public Safety determined the speed limit and that crosswalks were not practical. Mr. Warneke questioned if;t-JAe4.landscaping. Mr. Colbert stated none was planned. John Winter, 3557 Bluejay, gg.estip d the assessment method and stated he wanted Duckwood to remote opO He felt the entire project should have an area assessment. ... Sean Simpson asked if medians would be installed. He had concerns regarding the curb. Mr. Colbert stated that medians would not be installed. Elaine McCarthy-Pietsch had conte@ regarding the speed limit. Councilmember Wachter stated the City pbnld approach the State. Councilmember Egan explain 4:;L:zhf:4eed was based on the density of the area also. Councilmember Wachter questioned t. ure signal preparation and asked how long the water main would be= Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 there could be any deviatft#from they: nterline. The engineer stated no. Egan explained the tra :Ef1. :e}s.C.eM.-.. d questioned if one side would be adequate. Mayor Ellison gi$tr''if there would be completion penalties. The engineer stated.i4 (buncilmember Wachter had concerns regarding the construction impact on the City. Councilmember McCrea felt there should be informational meetings as the project progresses. Mr. Colbert stated it was hard to draw limits. Councilmember McCreaE installed underground. Mr. Co cost participation. McCrea su only and recommended the east the assessment rates. Mr...C,el. derive the rates. McCrea ui:g�: safety of the bike trails." the power lines could be i3 there would probably be construction on one side questioned the difference in ned various methods used to tion of the community on the Mayor Ellison stated the project was needed because of the expansion in Eagan and that this particular area was the fastest growing area in Eagan. Councilmember Gustafgiaxi input and informed them that He stressed that the Council developers and salesmen misr communication was an on-goio, problem could not be handl ed.he appreciated the community dk:.could reassess the path needs. 1SStiensng to the public. He stated assessments. He felt that W"And stated that the speed of improving the roads. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 531 (Lexington Avenue — Streets & Utilities) -and authorize the execution of the related Joint Powers Agreement. All voted in favor. PROJECT 533/Di#ft8 :1=.'{$glERTS i UTILITIES) Public Works Director Tom Cft�bert'f#)troduced the project to the Council. Bonestroo presented the::$etailJj.:;of the proposed project and stated that the completion date iia8 ezp"i�ted around October 1, 1989. Bob Rosene presented the utility changes that were involved in the project. He reviewed the estimated costs and the proposed assessments. Dan Gustafson, Stratford Oaks, reousted the preservation of the trees in the construction of, the..BFoject.. Mayor Ellison questioned if the County was expanding tkie:.iCiititfly in the area. Mr. Colbert stated yes and that the only ilii iiistiiie'-was a retaining wall. There was much discussion concerning that pocg on of the roadway. Councilmember Wachter stated the tree cQii stions should be evaluated. Mayor Ellison questioned if the developer would cost share with the City. The developer stated they would take it under consideration. Mr. Colbert informed the Council that Ron Cornwell approved of the Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989........ . . .."*"'***"' ...... project. There was discuson regar the assessment policy for the trailways. Egan moved, Wachter secoif hearing and approve Project 533 (D and authorize the execution of the All voted in favor. motion to close the public y Road - Streets & Utilities) ted Joint Powers Agreement. ftUTION CONTRACT City Administrator Tom Bed0s updAfed the Council on the matter, Mayor Ellison questioned if the*f4i ..werq::jiother bids. Mr. Hedges stated there was only one, from 4k..:. ated it was a potential conflict of interest anditati as a higher bid. Be also informed the Council that the tire". cost was covered by the County. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a contract with John F. Luoma and Associates to provide services related to the distribution of curbside recyclable containers. All voted in favor. DANIEL ERDAW.-ft-ft-ZARD SETBACK VARIANCE City Administrator Tom Edges 1nf.49-rmed the Council an application had been submitted b -.-:D&&i&::Erdman for a 2.15 foot variance to the 5 foot side:-:-y:gK-.;.K:i:set ck. Councilmember Wachter questioned how such a disOK-Mis ..V -ndy could occur. Community Development Director Dale Runkle statia"it was difficult to tell. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve a 2.15 foot variance to the 5 foot side yard setback for Daniel Erdman located on Lot 1 Block 2c Sunset First Addition, subject to all Code requirements. All voted i **'b*%... mt"ftm PROJECT 543R/PZTITION/ZAN PO$:: KYLXXX ROAD - SIBLEY HILLS DRIVE Community Development Direc�pr D4. -Runkle introduced the petition to the Council. Michael J. Sullivan, representative for the petitioners, stated the City's report gave rise to the EM requirement. Be disputed several areas of the final report and stated he intended to file an appeal to the District Court. He reque"ed a meeting be arranged to discuss alternatives. Mayor Ellison asked meet before any further action was taken Community"two'ef "0pm6ft*-`Director Dale Runkle responded that K was near the end of :Me time frame. Councilmember Egan suggested that the Council could '&hy the EAN request and that staff could work with the neighbors. Councilmember Wachter bad questions regarding the water wheel. Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES t .......:::::::::.:::::::.. February 21, 1989 Marilyn Murray questfV'Md which ::#;tees would be lost. She had concerns regarding the anii&*:Aa# tk#:::area. Mr. Colbert stated that the design was not completed''*auss%iraE` at the present time he was unable to state which trees might be lost. Councilmember Gustafson stated that the animals would need to adapt to the change. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to deny the preparation of an environmental asses •:'tn 7t6 .: for Project 543E (Skyline Road - Sibley Hills Drive "1an*d::fi,_:1ftft sat staff to work with the neighbors to mitigate the impac , th:1#: roject. All voted in favor. VARIAXCE/BUILDIH(} $$TBAC� POR SIGNAL BANK City Administrator T(W'-:g'eg%%i marized the need for the variance to the Council. Community Development Director Dale Runkle updated the Council on the background regarding the proposed project. John LeMay informed the Council that the only encroachment was the canopy and that the hardship was the traffic. Councilmember Gustafson questioned if there was a::Aged for six drive-throughs. Mr. LeMay stated that six drive-thrarfg�,�8.Vere needed. Gustafson moved, Egan se�nndid" :j:*ifte motion to approve a ten foot variance to the 50 foot building setba?i1:14for Signal Bank located at Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 1:1}L1:.::-29 -::18@�tion. All voted in favor. NARGELE OUTDOOR AD!V.&M- SING/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BILLBOARD ADVERTISING SIGN Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to continue the matter regarding the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. toallo ..a.:!AQ;; fAf?k.: � W" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2 :aid::::$:.+l Industrial Acres, to the March 7, 1989, City Councll�meetimgF''pgisuant to the request of the applicant. All voted in favor. TOWN CENTRE 100 7TH iJ� City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the item to the Council and stated that the APC recommended approval of the application. Community Development Director Dal& Rankle summarized the project for the Council. Charles Bartholdi infaae4ck.Se; £toil he was available for questions. He stated traili(sag:#[d#;ieti:8lks were proposed and the developer would prefer bituminous surface to concrete. He stated the developer would prefer to keep the trail� outside of O'Leary Park. Councilmember McCrea requested more information regarding the retaining walls. Public Works Director Tom Colbert furnished further detail regarding the retaining -walls and pointed out their location. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 X Mayor Ellison stressed theLxhe , i cess3.ty-ft*,*'a good job being conducted because of the nearby Councilmember Egan had questions regardingtheconstruction materials. Mr. Colon stated the project would be constructed with brick, limestone and stucco. Mayor Ellison had qu development. Mr. Colon a would be no heavy trucks. Councilmember Gustafson q ition ,..:if nineteen conditions. Councti a conditions. Councilmember': the types of uses in the office uses and that there there were seventeen or responded nineteen Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat for Town Center 100 7th Addition consisting of two lots and an outlot on 19.5 previously zoned LB acres within the Town Centre 100 Planned Development, as submitted by Federal Land Company, subject to the following i 0 .tions - 1. These standard conditi'o`h**#**:':a-::-:P.1at approval as adopted by Council action on September 1,1981- she 21 be complied with: Al. Bly V B2l B4l Cl, C2r C48 D11 Ell '%"'" 2. All trash shall within the building. 3. The landscaping shall be increased along the southern property line adjacent to the park and by the southwestern parking stalls. 4. A 201 wide trail .:-A.:;Kced along the easterly X.. property line. 5. The developerr, in conjuniftion V#.#h the easterly property owner, be responsible in providi#q a d6rth/south 81 wide bituminous pathway from Town Centre Drive to the i"posed eight foot east/west bituminous pathway. 6. This development shall construct an 81 bituminous trailway from the west boundary of this development to the proposed trail system located within the Waterford Ap.. "-.J .J:ment Development to the east. 7. The developer is i .4-.- it'" .... i�* d iipoj pon an eight foot bituminous trail to O'Leary Park from '*il'iii"-*-*pi6p;6iiid-'i!ight foot east/west bituminous trail. This north/south tr4$-3::.link be field staked and approved by the City's Landscape Archi'tapt prior to installation to insure compatible linkage to O'Leary Pa . rk pedestrian system. Page ll/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 `:::•`:: 8. A five foot wide pal be::eced along the south side of the Town Centre Drive from'* :.eat:`.0.4 ry of this development to the nortb/south sidewalk aliifit:#`itast boundary of the site. 9. All signage shall be subject to the one-time fee of $2.50 per square foot. 10. All mechanical eq AV:)?.3�, #e: enclosed or concealed by materials similar to the matPrfalie riff'- outside of the building. 11. Direct surface water di.$:G arge.-.4nto the existing 120 trunk storm sewer shall be limited toiiibe svirRhwest corner of this site. 12. A storm sewer exterii4`dn sti83 `be stubbed to Outlot A to the west from the existing 180 storm sewer stub in Town Centre Drive adequate to handle potential future flow of 4.0 cf s. 13. A 20' - 30' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the east property line as:::Dgcessitated by the depth of the existing 120 trunk sanitary sewer 3,iiE:::,... 14. Any relocation of ex etc.) shall be designed and requirements. 15. Each newly crea and water service conne ities (hydrants, catch basins, ..-An accordance with City dt- shall have a separate sanitary sewer to the appropriate City utility. 16. The east and west entrance to this development shall have a minimum width of 30' with 25' radii. 17. Adequate cross ea ensure adequate access to 18. The outside of the buil building materials on all four dedicated as necessary to -way. be constructed of the same e building. 19. The developer must submit detailed plans for the retaining walls for staff approval. All voted in favor. OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITIOMV0.ILININARY PLAT City Administrator Tapk?lt 0.9 s:'pE4 tinted the application to the Council and stated that the APC recommended approval of the project. Community Development Director Daj: :Runkle summarized the application for the Council. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES,.... February 21, 1989 ; : :' :i:+:: :'':...... `. Jim Phillipi (North Sttaic..Engineoik) distributed an agreement whereby the station assessmeti:C: W4a;x--:jOi&ed. Councilmember Egan commented that the assessment-*-*-:iis;ts9::d:`be paid. Councilmember Wachter requested clarification of the assessments. Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained the assessment method. Councilmember Egan asked what the staff's position was on the assessment condition. Mr. Colbert stated that staff felt.. that the condition should stand. The develo r reca :ti::`?::r':':" ?::� : pe ppei!''YiC=: ekt' tory. Councilmember McCrea questioned if $3,000.00 had already be" subtracted. Mr. Colbert stated that the report took the::.S3,000..QD into account. Egan moved, Wachter sss4nQe:motion to continue the matter regarding the preliminary:.- t: (rept') entitled Oak Cliff 3rd Addition as submitted by Robert Schlangen, to the March 7, 1989, City Council meeting, to allow staff to work out the assessment question. All voted in favor. BLUE RIDGE'SBCOND ADDITION/PRRLIMIMMY PLAT City Administrator Tom'Eeiis:pr.a�esented the application to the Council and stated the APC recommettdeti approval. Community Development Director Dale RurkRie inot the Council that the proposal was in conformancerrttte'i'3$nned Development, approved :.-.c Indirect Source Permit and.�iX. ii sive Guide Plan. The developer (L. A. Laukka Development Co.) was available for questions. A brief presentation was given. Councilmember Egan questioned the percentages for office/warehouse. The developer stated a rough estimate would be 50/50 to 60/40. Councilmember McCrea questioned if there would for for truck turn around. The developer stated room. Councilmember Wachter questioned the type and Jpdation_for the retaining wall. The developer detailed the informatiaks regikgoing the retaining wall. Councilmember Wachter requested &tai16.*:;:regarding the drainage. Mr. Colbert updated the Council on tits dra£rtage. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve a preliminary plat entitled Blue Ridge Second Addition for L. A. Laukka Development Co. consisting of three lots on 35.64 Planned Development zoned acres located along Lone Oak Dri". subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard co�t*tt:o:. at approval as adopted by Council action on Sept ember:::::.11 be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C21 C3, C4, C5, Dl, E1.,.F1 and Gl. 2. No parking shall be allowed on' :the public street. 3. Nine feet wide parking stalls shall be provided for employee use on the perimeter of the lot. Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 4. The rooftop mechari.kx:eglli:@?lt shall be screened from the public streets. 5. The fence or landscape edge shall be constructed along the southern lot line and retaining walls for pedestrian safety. 6. No direct storm spdd►►#r::::raaaetto�at will be allowed to the existing 24 inch gravity t i ::0ar. tuitlet for Pond FP -7. 7. The developer will be reeqquired to submit the appropriate retaining wall design documenta:bn fq=::'staff approval prior to final plat approval. All voted in favor. AUTUMN RIDGE ADDITION/RRiONING City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the application to the Council. Community Develo�ent.,Director Dale Runkle summarized the rezoning and the preliminary:::: Xs ; gpplications for the Council. Jim Ostenson (James Deve;topment�):.: informed the Council that the parties were in cooperation ii6d .p :;tstitlti ed the phases of the development. Mayor Ellison_a ::-w= owned the property to the west. The developer responded tiit$:iC:::&jhice Rahn owned the property to the west but that it was not amenable to the roadway going through. Mayor Ellison questioned if the developer had met with Engstrom. The developer stated they had met and that they were in agreement. He further stated that the road to the west was being acquired. Councilmember Wachtel: �ioi 06.4a ..'t ""t the cul-de-sac to Dodd was very long. Councilmember G`iiStalfsoiis Rtioned Engstrom's time table. The developer stated that Engstr.*I s t$#e table was two months behind its time table. Gustafson commentitd tha�:he felt the present cul-de-sac was ok for the firsttase.#. Colbert stated he had no problem with the cul-de-sac in r6§ards:::lb safety. Councilmember Egan mentioned he thought there were slot of lots for the amount of acreage and requested the size of the lots. The developer stated the smallest lot was 12,000 square feet. The developer explained to the Cofticil that it had access to Highway 3 but it was deleted for traffreasons. Councilmember Wachter stated he felt Mr...Jlgr�by..:.vrg44.d...probably not develop his property. Mayor Ellison st .".* }*;:Q>r+.*Oia. & second access as soon as Possible and requested the" dd'i't3an''Cf"a' condition that only phase one could be built until a second acce:at(.:was provided. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded,*1'he motion to approve the rezoning for Autumn Ridge Addition (James Development Company) of 38.6 Agricultural acres to R-1. All voted in favor. Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 r : ......... McCrea moved, Egan s-- do, the�@otion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of 99 lots':-1-`%pataer3, L of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road, known as Autumia::Aadition (James Development Company), subject to the following"conditions: ' 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2 , B3 , B4 , Cl , C2 , C3 , CT. ;g;:X1-:::::d G1. 2. Development must have agimss to .the property from Dodd. 3. Phase two of the develp fent &41. 1 not be constructed until a second access to the develpt�fdivided. All voted in favor. 5-2" B UNISYS Jerry Tank requested tiiak;e:;;trailway assessment be removed as it's removal was necessary for, time:*". 4. of the semi -conductor building. City Administrator tom Hedgeg:;:�eported that the trailway was never assessed. City Attoaey:::as Sheldon informed the Council that usually there was a neeAi::::a"project in order for the City tc assess. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the waiver for the trailway assessments for a trail along Pilot Knob Road in regard to Unisys Park. All voted in favor. Betty Bassett requested the;:&larif�:oation of the Eagan request to the MWCC. Public Works Direct&tiTom:-'b A bert briefly explained the option and the disposal station ilke. Ms. Bassett stated she felt the agreement considered Eagan a dumping spot and had further complaints regarding the matter. She requested the Council reconsider the matter. John Wesley, 1747 Bluebill Drive, :t ¢marked that Seneca did not accept the municipal sand and grit at t present time and questioned the delay. He requested the.;gtdaa;u;t# development contract and reiterated his complaints.: pif is ►:;bev�lopment Director Dale Runkle responded that the contracf�'rras��awaifirig.agency review. Councilmember Wachter stated that. a proposal would help the City of Eagan. Betty Bassett opposed the -regional sand and grit collection. Page 15/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 Mayor Ellison stated thex.-*0# 'd i;'-6ontinue to vigilantly watch out for the citizens' Mike Hazel, 2129 Silver Belly stated that he understood the project was just a concept. Public Works Director Tom Colbert replied that the matter would be brought back to the Council when the proposal was concrete. ............... SOUTH NETk4.*.TASK-' RCE Gustafson moved, Egan seconoid-� the;.i*.jiction to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to:4knt;4k-'ii1-i ' t..q.,04' Joint Powers Agreement with the South metro Task Pd*)'t'iii�---f-br::i 'All voted in favor. IBM COPY MACHINE Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to declare the IBM copy machine as surplus props ... Fty and sold to Dr. Schell of Altura, Minnesota, for a high bid o4 ---'.*.-*.,#.4 .00. All voted in favor. McCrea moved, Gustafson matter regarding the massage Council meeting. :-motion to continue the the March 21, 1989, City WORK SESSION MEETING Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a work session meeting for March 28,:.1.989.,1... at 7:00 p.m. to discuss strategic planning objectives. All vo COUNCIL I>T.BCUSSPPS The Council was informed that:...kbe TdIefson lawsuit depositions would be taken during the week of Peibruajf.27, 1989. The Council was reminded of the Chamber of Commerce luncheon to discuss TIF. 'k Public Works Director Tom Colbert requested the council respond to his department regarding the signal ai-.-.-'--Alackhawk and County Road 30. He questioned if the Co signal installed at that location or another. V"Mr Councilmember Wachter questioned if:..*.*.tbe Cityput fuel out on bids. Public works Director Tom Colbert ted yes but not on a yearly basis. Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCITA.)tTNUTE February 21, 1989 Councilmember Wachtei:-.4-0uested:--:YjA:-addition of an amendment to * ... q........ t the Autumn Ridge Addition i" h Va school needed better bus access. Councilmember McCrea'"out that there were two separate parcels for two separate owners. Mayor Ellison requested staff to check with the School District as soon as possible. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the conditions regarding the Autumn piece should be worked out before they cOqROL.--.bef.pre.-tbLe Council. Mayor Ellison stated 'a'*e"'*t****e"*'7."*V.'*091"d**'-"*kl**'W-'*:, a closed session following the Council meeting to discuss OfidingMtigation. Egan moved, Wachtero . i i ded,,*:. th *. e - motion to approve the checklist dated February 20,, 1989, in the amount of $1861,796.07F and the checklist dated February 21,, 1989, in the amount of $667,855.23. All voted in favor. Upon motion duly made 6Y'Vii n, seconded by Wachter, the meeting was adjourned at 12:1a... a.... !.voted in favor. E. J. VanOverbeke — City Clerk We believe the report mak Legislature for improving recommendations of the re • State funding for proper' annually to keep pace wit increases in tax burdens. suggestions to the party tax structure. Rey programs should increase and to prevent rapid * -The difference between tax burdens for low value homes and high value homes should be narrowed and property tax burdens for business property, no amential property and apartments should be doeeE=;:::: * Homeowners' property tax stat"ents sLould accurately reflect property tax relief paid for thepata. + Funding for transition 3d (!he'`i9ig2ecement for the homestead credit program) and other property tax relief money should be reallocated to achieve desired taxpayer outcomes. These property tax relief funds could be distributed through the following types of programs: 1. a homestead rel to homeowners; 2. a new tax base e ability of local 3. a local aovernme that provides relief directly that equalizes the nce services; and * Disparity reduction aid amounts should be grandfathered as provided for under current law. The League Coordinating Committee wi legislative session. The Iati.:33pRz the Coordinating Committee ..report �•itll 1989 data when it becomes availab3:s. inue to meet during the 's and Horgan prepared update the report with If you would like further information al."t the project or have questions or comments on any of t13e rec4ftendations, please contact any member -of the Coordinating Committee (list attached) or Laurie Fiori Hacking at the League. I t ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULARCITY COUNCIIx NEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 6,, 1989 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Project 561, Receive PetitionJOrder Feasibility Report (Sterns Addition - Streets and btil ties) Item '2. Consider Petition to Vacate Public Right -of -Way (Egan Avenue - Vlas Lane to Pilot Knob ,Road) MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILIUMERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 6, 1989 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Project 561, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Sterns Addition -Streets 8 Utilities) --Staff has received a petition from the Rosemount School District and two adjacent developers requesting the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and sewers to service the proposed Sterns Addition which is the site of the new elementary school along Dodd Road. With the petition incorporating adequate guarantees for all costs to be incurred, it is the staff's recommendation that the Council authorize the preparation of this feasibility report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 561 (Sterns Addition -Streets 6 Sewers) and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report. Item 2. Consider Petition to Vacate Public Right -Of -Way (Egan Avenue-Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) --Several years ago when Pilot Knob Road was reconstructed to its present four lane urban design, the angles intersection of Egan Avenue was reconstructed to a new location south of Vilas Lane. The old alignment was subsequently obliterated and abandoned. It would be appropriate to consider formally vacating this excess public right-of-way through the formal public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To schedule a public hearing to vacate public right-of-way (Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) for April 4, 1989. ISI Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator MINUTES OF REGULO'.MEETING OF A regular meeting of the E March 7, 1989, at 6:30 were Mayor Ellison and CouiYd'111i McCrea. Also present were City Director Tom Colbert, Community City Planner Jim Sturm, Assista City Attorney James Sheldon.,:.;::::::: ff 1989 RAGAN CITY COUNCIL n City Council was held on Tuesday, :•:yaa_Municipal Center. Present er f:::fttiter, Egan, Gustafson and inis.rator Tom Hedges, Public Works veloment Director Dale Runkle, hgineer Mike Foertsch and City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended continuing Item C under the Consent Agenda (License, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, Pulltabs at.Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South Robert Trail) to the Marchii:: -11....1989, City Council meeting. Wachter moved, McCrea seCoiide :?;t'he motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favoi:5 February 21. 1989. Mayor Ellison requested the change on page 1, paragraph 4, correcting the name to 'Mike Michou•. Councilmember Egan requested the correction from Bonestroo representative to Dakota County :S}.ghway.:Department representative, Dave Zeck, on pages 4 and`::::;:?:::::;::<:::::::::: McCrea moved, Wachter secon&.d, tkitE:motion to approve the minutes for the February 21, 1989 `regq.'j r Council meeting as amended. All voted in favor. RESOLUTION/FULL TRANSFER OF THE STATE'S MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TO THE HIGHWAY USER TAX DISTRIBUTION FUND Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch introduced the matter to the Council. Wachter moved, Egan seco.nd d:,.:..tb.e.:motion to approve the resolution to allow full tib; s �...X. �:>:#�t�;:State's motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tas'd sE'fib"utiori fund. All voted in favor. Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 POLICE.WPARTSENT RffikANISATION Chief of Police Pat 6iAgan repot" l to the Council regarding the reorganization request. Coni:# .memh**' tgan asked if a balance would be maintained between the two�eiiants. Geagan responded yes. Egan requested a clarification regarding the administrative secretary. Mayor Ellison asked if this would achieve the Police Department's goal of constant supervision. Geagan responded yes, on paper. Wachter moved, Gustaf# tt 4#lQiR.j... :the motion to approve the reorganization of the Police"tYegttm'Eri: structure as presented. All voted in favor. DEPART D.TES City Administrator Torii $ ges:*V' 'i] a thank you letter from the O'Patrany grandparents. Chief Southorn informed the Council that the Eagan Fire Department was involved in controlling the NSP Black Dog fire. John Hohenstein dist f ted -hats from the recycling firm and stated the public response 'wa:s:�Ikaiitastic. Councilmember McCrea questioned where the containers were::Tef.t. Mr. Hohenstein stated they should be at the doorstep. Item A. 1. Clerk/typist positions. a. Full-time clerk/ to approve the hiring of completion of the City's tration. It was recommended a subject to successful tion requirements. b. Half-time clerk/typist iiif::Commuiii.ty Development. It was recommended to continue the hiring::for :'the position until the March 21, 1989, City Council meeting. c. Half-time clerk/typist in Parts Department. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Nancy Hammel subject to the successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. Item B. Plumbers L.;ce kt::.1-:..— It was recommended to approve the,$.:plumbing licenses and 1 water softener license as presented. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Item C. It was recommended to City Council meeting. item to the March 21, 1989, - -r,_ - Z-TsT- FU m- -.. It was recommended to::e8g p�e;;.an--s endment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Resta:iraiit:::m:;i a new manager (Judy Johnson, 1400 47th Avenue, Colum #a eet:ghts). Item E. Ex - Storm Sewer). It was recommended to continue'"indef initely the scheduled final assessment hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer). Item F. It was recommended tore Project 487R (Braun Court - S public hearing to be held on Item G. he final assessment roll for Storm Sewer) and schedule a It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll for Project 518 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and order the public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. Item H. Maintenance 1filfZ j; J'* 10's?>>1; : A R ov Secs/Authorize Ad for Bids (Miscellaneous n**arii3`i4ttachmentsl . It was recommended to approvie the:' cifications for Maintenance Vehicle No. 125 (Miscellaneous E(;lpaaen*;;and Attachments) and authorize the advertisement for d"'bid o'sening to be held at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 1989. Item I. Contract 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Streets and Storm Sewer). It was recommended to approve the third and final payment for Contract 88-06 (Braun Court;:.- Storm Sewer) and accept the project for perpetual mainiitce:::::::::i:::::::: It was recommended to apple s ;phi fifth and final payment for Contract 88-12 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. Item R. It was recommended to a Contract 87-32C (Chapel Hill accept the project for perpe ;•-.11 cond and final payment for treets and Utilities) and nce. It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989.::::::.._._. Item M. It was recommended to ap:&.we.::::tb�'-Looperative Power Association Lease Agreement for South kl:e :::: X;61d 'D" (Fire Station No. 3) and authorize the Mayor and Cy"Clerk to execute all related documents. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda items as amended and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. DRUG ANA#B[iR :`ItlBS' STi1l�CB EDUCATION City Administrator Tom Hedgq* infckk-Ued the Council that staff was considering a program for fi��h 9raiig drug education to be conducted by the Police Officers,...:,:,: Chief of Police Pat Geagan explained the program which would consist of one hour per week for 17 weeks. He stated the course was very structured and that there was a training program involved. The Lions Club would pay for the travel expenses. Be further stated that January of 1990 was the soonest the pr am could begin. Councilmember McCrea there should be grant money available for the payment ir::;ttis:;ti*aea;>`She felt there should not be duplication on different levels and tha*t;:the program should be coordinated. She stated the children's::4.-'iew point should not be overlooked. Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 19.69 Mayor Ellison felt thye'-money woulff-%be was a very worthy endeavor;:::;_. Councilmember Gustafson' tat.-t"re every year to add hours to curi*eifr'um. He needed. well spent as the program was tremendous pressure felt the program was City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council no action was necessary on the matter. PROJECT 546/CEDARVALE BMI KVARfY iSTREET IMURFACIM) Assistant City Engineer MikeFoerte:.ch updated the Council on the matter. Bob Freegard (OSM) presented the details of the feasibility report to the Council. He reviewed the location, structure of pavement, repairs needed and the overlay. Be reported that the project would provide uniform width and he outlined the storm sewer improvements. He showed the assessment areas and presented the estimated cost. Councilmember Egan questi:dri6tT;::th;*:Storm sewer improvements. Mr. Freegard described the nature;pf the.iicplovements. Councilmember Wachter questioned the change -.0 west end. Mr. Freegard described the changes. Councilmember Gustafsdii asked why the north properties were not assessed. Mr. Freegard stated those properties had their own service road. Mr. Gustafson stated the other properties also had a service road. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch informed the Council that those service roads were part of the gas station property and that it was a private access drive:;a1y:;::;::':;:: Councilmember Egan questionc#Q:::the J -:QB contingency. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that:teconstsuction had more unknowns than new construction. Councilmember Gustafson indicated that Rahn Road should also be upgraded. Councilmember McCrea concurred and stated that Rahn Road was in bad shape. Public Works Director Tom Colbert pointed out that the neighboring residents opposed a past proposal to upgrade Rahn Road. Assistant City Enginepz-..X ke:•:;Faer.tsch emphasized that the assessments were consistent" ;sik.;::':'8:::ptctices. ..........?a ... McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 546 (Cedar401-e Boulevard — Restoration/Resurfacing) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. All voted in favor. Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 VACATE DRAIRAGE AIiS:.:RTILITY EA$i!lBNT (LOT 158, BLOCS 11, �R�lSADS) Assistant City Engineer Milte4�ertsch supplied the information regarding the petition for the Council. He informed the Council that the petitioner requested a two-week continuance of the matter to further review the landscaping. Mayor Ellison questififie8*'t�ii"' aff�i"t that would have on the Council action. Mr.Foertsch stat;" theg.j_would be no effect. Councilmember Egan commented that._the mdtter should not be continued. McCrea moved, Egan seMA4ft;r the:::*0tion to close the public hearing and approve the va 1166h a#` a drainage and utility easement for Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. VACATE A PORTION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY (HERITAGE LANE - HORTH.;QF YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) Assistant City Enginee'r'''�MZL-ie.:;gpertsch furnished an update on the matter for the Council. Egan moved, Wachter seco#(tled;;::`mo tion to close the public hearing and approve the va_gai 4i:: f portion of street right-of-way (Heritage Lane - North of :"."'"A 6b Doodle Road), and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. AWARD CONTRACT/LEXINGTON AVENUE - RESERVOIR (CONTRA%::.:$-24/RAOJBCT 538A) City Administrator Tom "Hid. ggsetdit-itized the background on the matter. City Attorney Jim Sheldor}::`infoi�jgd the Council that a verbal commitment had been received fro�m:;'the f.f ie insurance company and that the matter could be closed iiixt week. Assistant City Engineer informed the Council that the City couA* proceed with the contract award. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to award Contract 88-24 (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) to Brown..Tank Minneapolis of Eagan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Eeecute all related documents. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PBR0Y$6: QD'1'DOOR ADVERTISING SIGN City Administrator Tom Hedges intr;Gduced the item to the Council and stated that the APC recommended dei4iil of the application. Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Community Developmen application and stated th Administrator Tom Hedges stricken and could be add asked for a review of the Hedges stated that a plat action. McCrea stated she ,...Director Dale Runkle summarized the of tbti<:::sign exceeded criteria. City it it d;; thez0jRstanding obligations should be d''a:;ritYe date. Councilmember McCrea rules•iegarding financial obligations. Mr. or a waiver of plat is the triggering felt the City should be consistent. Arthur Dean (Naegele )::iCGe]::ttid the site meets the criteria of the present sign ordinaiieev'..ft-isitat�& he felt the size of the sign was an issue but that the Cound-I..:had 4w owed larger signs in the past. He explained that the size.:.of the -sign was an industry standard. He submitted a list ai:':.tagazi :iiiivertisers who have used Naegele signs and stated ..allow advertisers to move about. Councilmember Egan questioned if the height of the sign met City Code. Mr. Runkle stated yes. Mr. Egan pointed out that the Council had previously discussed the location of freeway signs and questioned if this sign met that cri"ria. Mr. Runkle stated yes and that it was one of the few sites remahni:iia:•.. Mayor Ellison requested inf*o"tfu�t:'inn regarding the "principle use" concept. Mr. Dean explained tha.::: ?e Eagan ordinance did not have principle use language, :iut:::tt::tkie results were basically the same. He stated that Naegel:g :%o{ vI.d.like businesses to retain the sign. City Attorney Jim Sheldon described Eagan's ordinance and stated that the City had determined that 250 feet was appropriate. Be indicated that if larger signs were requested, standards should be set forth in the Mayor Ellison suggested"'a -r y #-i;+"of_ the billboard ordinance. Mr. Hedges stated he felt that it was;:a goq': point and that it had been about seven years since the ordiiiince wa: Page B/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7#. 1989 billboard advertising sign'; -On On Lot 2, BI0Cik It S & W Industrial Acres, to allow further research W' the billb"id ordinance. All voted in xx - favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN A&* t/PA*K CENTER ADDITION/FRDZPAL LAND CONPAN7 City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that the APC had considered the applicat-jpq -:.*aWftted by Federal Land Company . .M ..... . .. and recommended a denial ati-isive Guide Plan Amendment and rezoning. Community Development Direc!t:dr Da.I-:.i0k.Runkle reviewed the site - ii. ': t plan with the Council and made;:r.LA :6r4q!j3o the BRA Option K. He . .............. informed the Council that '-.t-16n had been reviewed with the City Attorney. Martin Colon (Federal Land Company) announced that he was prepared to give a full presentation if requested by the Council. In regard to the traffic matter., he stated he had met with Sorenson and Colbert and that eventual bably 1991, Cliff Road would be a six -lane road. He stated th'e'�::':06�tivu-ration would be similar to Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Colon explained that.the:::: 0 V ..... r counted all trees in ft* ....... .. excess of 6 inches in width..a 'fee feet tall and that the count was approximately 180. He .-eii%fthe trees were concentrated in the ... .. northwest corner near the senior citizens site. He observed that if the plan proceeded, 200 to 258 of the trees would be saved if the office buildings were installed. He explained that if the BRA plan was approved, up to 338 of the trees could be saved. He reported that . Federal Land Company would:la . ... s when the development was completed. .......... . Councilmember McCrea asked vfhn th;L-.':..:center would open. Mr. Colon stated it would open either when ;he fijkil placement of Cliff Road was completed (about 1991) or whe'h***:.: the terim construction could be accomplished, including the widening afid.%'::signalizing of the westerly access point. He stated this would solve the problem. He announced that the developer would assume the cost of the upgrade. Councilmember McCrea suggested using the Target lot as a prototype for saving trees. Mir. Colon stated the developer was willing to make that commitment. Councilmember Egan es in other areas of the development would be saved. He also questioned what type of interim improvements were needed. Mr. Colon inkiii-med the Council that the developer was willing to pursue any interim options set out by the County and the City engineers. Mr. Egan questioned if it would be an Oeither/oru proposition. Assistant City Engineer responded yes. Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Councilmember McCrea questioned if Federal Land could open earlier if the temporary provisions w :Eg made. MAY> Colon stated yes. Mayor Ellison recommended that the C;i .:;ah.4}7Qd encourage the upgrading as top priority. Councilmember fatii�:ejiiestioned if the County approval was for the two entrances off of Cliff Road. Mr. Colon responded that it was only preliminary. Mr. Foertsch informed the Council that the County had not reviewed the study and would not do so until March 13. Be stated that the 1991 or 1992 upgrade was not official. Councilmember McCrea stiak:�i¢ f i#cil could approve a resolution. City Administrator Redge*0 commented that staff could reprioritize the capital improvements plan. City Attorney Jim Shei ]Qifti: mi* -s:' �4d that it was a sensitive area and that whichever dieeon't`Council went, there would be criticism and perhaps a lawsuit. He informed the Council of two alternatives: I. Obtain additional information and facts regarding use of the entire Park Center site ar;;a'multi-family development. II. 1. Send the CPD Comprehet ive Gu& " Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for;:::;.ev:iE[: 2. Send the west part::5#''Ehe Park Center property to the APC to begin action for rezoning that property to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to prepare the following: a. Resolution amendi,[i.9::;thQ;:.;;pgprehensive Guide Plan. b. Resolution app=ovinij.tfi'e rezoning and entering into the Planned Development Agt.¢ement-:for the eastern part of the property to Commercial:::V.Ianndd Development uses. c. Resolution approving the kiliminary Plat of the eastern part of the property with the western part of the property as shown as an outlot. d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to revO"El Option Agreement with the RRA and Federal Land for acquisition of the eastern part of the property. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 g. Settlement AO'gement for between the City.$t Eagan a of the pond and i i4t,1'... property. . condemnation lawsuit deral Land for acquisition s on the Park Center Mayor Ellison asked how the Metropolitan Council received authority to rezone in Eagan. Mr. Sheldon stated the authority was given by the state legislature and he further explained the history. Councilmember McCrea ..... :'E a she thought the Comprehensive Guide Plan was a gq.. e. She stated the changes in the surrounding land use had not affected Eii'is parcel and questioned how a lawsuit could be generated. Mt`elMgi1 stated that a lawsuit would not mean that the Council :di.d.sitiytl�:i.r�q:Siong. McCrea stated the City had not received a lawsuiks£ezr`quiE0:a while. Councilmember Gustafson questioned that if the Council needed to take a procedure, what assurance would the developer have. He stated he leaned toward the proposed type of development and questioned if the resolutions would cover these concerns. Mr. Sheldon stated that the procedure was consiste3t`*ith the last five Planned Development Agreements and that all pa'*Al�g:e2tQuld understand the position. Mr. Sheldon also comment¢t3 that :120 day limit applied only to the preliminary plat and ttist.;tt?eglicant should agree to the continuance. Councilmember Egan suggested the Council act on only two matters at the present time: (1) recommend change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan; or (2) rezone to Multi Residential. Councilmember Wachter suggested also including sending it to Dakota County. Councilmember Egan q:ies'k3i ..... ie;:Met Council's timeframe. Community Development stated it could be anywhere from 10 to 90 days and ti kt ttF:traffic studies would be reviewed. Councilmember Gustafson questioned:-*3Ehat if the City sent the matter to the Metropolitan Council and it approved, could the City still change its mind. Councilmember Egan stated the record was clearly established and that in 1984, the Council refused rezoning on the basis of excess commercial in Eagan '..Since that time, there has been substantial change in the area. He..:jgtated that the plan is very sensitive and that the developer demonA ated that D -III would be spot zoning. He further stdt€53;::tht.xk►g:;tudy showed that the area is ripe for further retail zoxi ig .: .... Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the iiOUon to: 1. Approve and send the CPD Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Park Center Addition to the Metropolitan Council for review. Page ll/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 2. Send the west part:*ff the Pa Wi tinter property to the APC to begin action for rezoii ;.that..::p.&rty to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to prepae the following: a. Resolution amending the Comprehensive Guide Plan. b. Resolution apptW.fi�g :t.ho:::�o'zoning and entering into the Planned Developmefit` �4�};4!4meii ?::tor the eastern part of the property to Commercial...-'.- ann6*4j::Developnent uses. c. Resolution approviAQ:the ft�eliminary Plat of the eastern part of the props:r:ty:: 4ithxthiii4estern part of the property as shown as an outl16t. d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to revieia:#h executed Option Agreement with the HRA and Federal i is ;€Qi:::;apgaisition of the eastern part of the property. g. Settlement Agreegiat::;sz:::t3tp condemnation lawsuit between the City. gf:::La:g'aii and Federal Land for acquisition of the pond and ut'.:—: easements on the Park Center property. All voted in favor. Councilmember Egan stted,;the.;.sppiicant agrees to continue the preliminary plat applicatii►;i?::::;? Wachter moved, Gustafson sea gded,:he motion to approve a resolution requesting Dakota Couri�y upcade Cliff Road between I -35E and Cliff Center. All voted in fai'pr. PRSLIRINARY PLAT/OAR CLIFF 3RD ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the matter to the Council. Community Development Director::Dale Runkle summarized the application. Assistant City Engineer MFoertsch informed the Council that staff did not recall making:a commitment to the developer regarding unasse6:0-"::;:ft;RatE 33t bligations. Councilmember Egan referenced Tom.Calbert's letter dated March 2, 1988, to Tom Hedges. He stated that.' ie Council alone would make those determinations. Councilmember Wacii er noted that even if staff had made commitments, it would not be binding. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7,, 1989 ........... X., Saul Bernick distribdted a packet"to the Council, including an Affidavit from Greg Soule..Re informedthe Council that Mr. Schlangen 4'otaswe ti""' contested the new special n. K-:$ind believed it was a ...... .. ..... :.' settlement negotiation. He 9*t*ftd::W*-t at no time was anyone aware that such an assessment would ei"ifil-ii-i-C.- He announced that they felt it was a binding agreement. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the owner had a duty to inquire as to the authority.i*i:i::nt::::w..et:tv;cated that the City enters into all agreements through t: :Councilmember Wachter emphasized that every parcel muit."..Pay to financial obligations. Mr. Bernick pointed out thg�"-'Ahey*16d relied on the City's .. _ X...... actions. City Administrato.r.z.-T ..... :.' .... 0*:�Sodge.i%::::Vecapped the procedure for the City requiring availabili4:::,*'tifi*"&*"'rge"'-'g",:,."'*'*'i**. Bernick stated that the assessment was arbitrary. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch commented that the review with Mr. Wobschall was to identify and explain the assessments. Councilmember Egan stated the City would not negotiate on the basis of supposed statements by Wobschall. City Attorney James Mi-624pn.stated that only unimproved property could be deferred. Mr. Bed should either be included or waived. Mr. Sheldon commentedi.ii�,i.E:::i&.*::::.Schlangen must determine what X. - . V... - is owed and who has authority�:*Councilgftber Egan questioned if the Council needed to establish a*.* Sheldon stated it could be waived. Mayor Ellison pointed"'out that the City needed to recover these costs and that a deferment would be a good compromise. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat (replat).jkntit1..ed.Dak.C1iff 3rd Addition consisting of two lots (2.91 acres)acres) located along the west side of Slater Ro'*"'a'-d':':'ii6"u'th-'-'-df."alff Road in the northwest quarter of Section 31, as submittio by.' bert Schlangen, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard conditions of plat*:::.;&Pprova1 as adopted by Council action on September 15,, 19871 shall be complied with: Alf Blo, B2r B4r Clp C2r C4p DI, Elf Fl. and Gl. 2. Lot 1 shall be reviewed by the..City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised submitted for Lot 1 based on current landscape policyV--.-'::-4"---'- -4 ........... Cif.. -prior to the final plat submission. 4. The development is required to:"d a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 5. The development is reiq�ted to.ide sewer and water service to each platted par cell'***" :::::::::::::::::; 6. Subject to a written agreement to allow assessment, the assessible cost shall be deferred and assessed to Outlot B. All voted in favor. Councilmember Gustafson aslie:if peas correct in that the City did not propose assessments at thi:"6ther':*:f6tages. Mr. Foertsch stated he was correct. Mr. Gustafson rep ed th4it:he felt uncomfortable when the City missed it so many timest:i)�.gt:agseed it was a compromise. GENERAL FUND BUDGET AWUSRW&T/DECEMBER 31, 1988 City Administrator Tom Hedges described the adjustments to the Council and stated that the matter could be considered at the work session. Councilmember McCrea a_'_W:::�U:-the legal fees had been under -estimated for 1988. Mr. that lawsuits make up a certain portion of the legal f""s and':ftiither stated that Hauge received all of his payments la:year:;�E+ explained that the transition caused doubling of: 1E31:i3'sta but that the revenue would offset it. McCrea questioned::he 1989 legal fees would also increase. Mr. Hedges stated::t at revenue sources are tight and that the City would need to do tight monthly forecasting. Be informed the Council that the 1989 budget would be monitored closely. McCrea suggested taking a look at the engineering provisions. She requested good projections. She felt there was a need for an in-house policy in regards to contacting consstated that it should strictly be a legal matter M .or L <tii: sOAtact the attorneys. Councilmember McCrea emphasized that.. she:pas not saying that the fees were too high, just recommending taat it:.4b ould be monitored. Councilmember Egan indicated 'f21at ti".* projected budget increased by 408 and that the City should take a look at the matter. He stated that the revenues were not increasing as fast as the expenditures. He felt the City could not count on permits and fees to handle the budget. City Administrator Tom Hedges explaj�ed that 1989 would have upward adjustments to the reventl..,Bg„further explained the budgeting process. Mayor Ellison commented that the City:had a higher contingency amount at the present time. He stated th'4:t;:the City also estimated revenues more liberally and felt that the City should begin to estimate revenues more conservatively. Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 McCrea moved, Egan seeVnded, the.;motion to approve the fiscal 1988 budget adjustments ai-*:: sresented : 1 voted in favor. VARIANCE/BUILDING F '�ILLAUMR INDUSTRIES Community Development Director Dale Runkle briefed the Council on the application. Nick Linsmeier (Plant::': ... if�g�� f.::.f *farmed the Council that the hardship was for fire safely"'reaaijris •�:: explained the layout and the type of product of the industry :-",-'Ile fuz: Page IS/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA SIGN Community Development':iVi-.Xector.-.-W--'i Runkle explained the '** ............. - - - modification to the sign agrW,1;e-*t' 1 stated tated that the City's sign inspector had reviewed the mai�eiffaknd indicated there was nothing which would prohibit consideration of the request. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a modification of the C1 if f :.YA'j(k0-:-( - 1ex.i. .-..-.Sign Agreement to permit the : .. ;aj ....... X -XV.: ... ........ 6 - ocated at Cliff Lake Center pylon sign and a monument...8mIry.: . PX -r. as presented. All voted in favor::;;: COMPREHENSIVE GUIQJC��LAN ANDM=T/RHZONIMQ/ r OUTLOT..*. ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that a letter had been received from the developer requesting a continuance. Rollie Crawford (developer) informed the Council that the developer is seriously rethinking the entire request and would return before the APC if the plao**:.-.changed. Councilmember Egan asked....if" an engineering report. Community Development Directot.: a e. kIe stated that the applicant had requested review without :g.. yor Ellison remarked that the developer should let tbet air its commercial concerns. Mr. Crawford stated the devel.-_Iw a to re-evaluate the entire 0 situation. Councilmember McCrea asked for the length of the continuance requested. Mr. Crawford stated indefinite and reiterated that the developer was willing to go .. back..bafQr.o the APC. McCrea complimented the developer on its attic spa: X IA': the request. Egan moved, McCrea seconded-:-",'. .. the 416tion to continue indefinitely the Comprehensive Guide Plan Ame;ftdment:**a'ad rezoning of 1.4 Agricultural acres to a Limited M"4"sine$W".district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminaiy plai''-':to allow the developer to review the entire request, with the condition that if the plan changes, the matter will be referred back to the Advisory Planning Commission. All voted in favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN A=NDMENT/RBZONING/ PRELIMINARY PLAT/STERNS MbITION/ISD #196 City Administrator TCWftES tf uced the matter to the Council. Community Developiiihi..-Di recior " Dale Runkle stated the architects were available to discuss th'6::bus access issue. Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Kevin Sullivan (Wold:-A-ssociation)......thanked the staff for their consideration in the handij-:4!p, of th **'*:'**-iter and stated he was available for questions. Mayor Ellison asked Mr. Sullivan if he were comfortable with the bus circulation. Mr. Sullivan responded yes. Councilmember Egan questioned if the City had reviewed the matter. Public Works Director Tom Colbert replied that staff had reviewed the matter and was also evaluating the over -flow events and increasing the width of Dodd Road. questioned the access width. Mr. Sullivan explained tDel widt3i2 Mr. Wachter questioned if the parking would be adequate for..,speci-al events. Mr. Sullivan reported that the residential Xr"s miAs.t.- be used and that it is the past practice of the Scholl... ie ::,use residential areas. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from Mixed Residential to Public Facilities (schools)j, as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterns Addition. All voted in favor. Wachter moved, Egan se.>the,motion to approve a rezoning of 16.46 Agricultural acres t ' *.;ft..a P66ilc Facilities district, as submitted by Independent Scho. Distr:i"."'No. .196 - Sterns Addition. All voted in favor. Egan moved, McCrea sopblift'd, the motion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary school located east of Dodd Road and south of Backmore Drive (extended) in the north half of Section 25, as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterns Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard condt--t�- kti�ippr oval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1.0,81"ih - a - 11 be complied with: Al, Bl, B21 B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, Dl; El aiid. Gl. 2. The development will be i;OquirtO limit post -development phosphorus export levels to pre-developimi-i"eint levels. 3. City staff to review the grading plan and the School District to be required to remove the drainage from the Schramm property. 4. The development will be requir6A..-to submit a landscape plan which defines the boundary of the scho6l':'and the Schramm property. adjoining property owners 5. The School District:ad'J of the discrepancy in the survey. All voted in favor. City Administrator Tom ff ge:?Ipaated the Council on the background of the matter. Councilmember McCrea requested further clarification. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that HUD would only sell the entire parcel. Councilmember Gustaifsiii;st ge.t6d selling the land (for this parcel) but retaining the 'Y3'9"Eftiii�ii+iiy:.pr Daniel Drive. Councilmember Wachter requested t e am#sgnt of acreage being sold. Community Development Director Dale Runkle stated it was approximately 17 acres. Councilmember McCrea* Brad Swenson incurred the legal costs. City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated he was sure there were some costs which were incurred and suggested the Council have the land appraised. Councilmember Egan had concerns regarding title problems. Egan moved, Wachter 6.*ctinded, the motion to give direction to the City staff as follows:`''` :%::::;::.:.>:;:;;... 1. The HUD property located at :tot :southwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road is ta:3.;:(ki::oi the reservoir site. 2. The following propEtty'..is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was required and shall be designated surplus and should be appraised for sale as follows: a. The northerly extension of Daniel Drive at Diffley Road to be appraised with the ink*pttq.: sel:x�1s R-1 property. b. The property along the east of Walnut Hills Park of Wilderness Run Road and aised as R-1 or R-2. c. The portion of the previbiisly p posed Soderholm Addition at the northwest corner of Lexington::-A4enue/Diffley Road to be appraised with the intent to sell as R-4 or Commercial. All voted in favor. PROJECT 561/RECEIVE PRTITIOH/ORpBR FEASIBILITY REPORT (STERNS ADDITION - STREEig' AND UTILITIES) Egan moved, Gustafson:" :ecgic%t? C3i:motion to receive the petition for Project 561 (Sterns Addition - Streets and Sewers) and authorize the preparation of a feasibi ty report. All voted in favor. Page 18/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 PETITION TO VACATE PUMIC RIGH',,-t*4AY (EGAN AVENUE - VILAS LAHg': 1}:.: ILQx; i'OB ROAD) Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a public hearing to vacate the public right-of-way (Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) for April 4, 1989. All voted in favor. City Administrator Tom Hedges staLjed the Town Hall Grant was not approved by the state but that country would fund a portion of the move. Mr. Hedges also sta been resolved. sha Bussey water matter had Mr. Hedges referenced his memorandum regarding the Community Center and stated it was a draft only. Councilmember Egan mi to the Council that the City of Chanhassen was utilizingfbt:'ommunity Center. Community Development Di;�gctor..:DQ1:'4rRunkle updated the Council on the Seneca project. Public Works Director.:';!toiu' Colbert presented an update on Dodd Road/494 upgrade. Councilmember Wachter had concerns regarding airplane noise. Councilmember GustafsQit:::askeek €:the Council would conduct a workshop on the referendum iai1 4:::: yds Ellison stated a workshop was scheduled for March 28, 1989,.;Aria that the workshop could partially be devoted to the topi4: Councilmember Gustafson had:::'0'oncei#4 regarding 'discovered assessments° and he stated that they seLqd to come up often and questioned if they could all be found at once. Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained the process. City Administrator.Tom Hedges stated that the City collects what it can. Mayor Ellison commended the Public';[orks Department in the admirable job of clearing the snow at tliE last snow storm. Mayor Ellison stated t'heE'::i.e::drrie-property was looking good and that an ice arena was being propose. Councilmember Egan had concerns r"arding the Council packet for the meeting and stated that he felt the conditions were becoming skimpy. Public Works Director Tom Colbert responded that because of Page 19/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 the recent 3-step process,:::::fit eliminated the necessity of many technical detailed condit!4.nro. WESCOTT GA WT COMDEMMATION Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to settle the Wescott Garden Lots Condemnation. All voted in favor. Wachter moved, Gustafson se%ond, checklist dated February 28, 1989 -in checklist dated March 6, 1989.4.n::the checklist dated March 7, 14::Er"t in favor. AWODRNMEMT he motion to approve the amount of $527,288.53; the nt of $128,278.97; and the nt of $217,512.26. All voted The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk 'THE MORNING AFTER' March 7, 1989 "The Morning After" is an extremely brief report of the action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on March 7, 1989. There are no details reported in this account; however, the action taken by the City Council on each of the agenda items and each of the other business items is reflected. DEPARTMENT HBAD BUS 1. The resolution to allow full transfer of the State's motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tax distribution fund was approved. 2. The reorganization of the Police Department management structure was approved. CONSENT AGENDA ,_ 3. The hiring of Virginia Dicenza as clerk typist for the Administration Department and Nancy Hammel as clerk typist for the Parks Department were approved and the Community Development clerk typist position is continued until the March 21, 1989 City Council meeting. 'O,&W4. The eight plumbing licenses and one water softener license were approved as presented. (Tpo 5. The gambling license application of the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club �^— for sale of pull -tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor was continued to the March 21, 1989 City Council meeting. �-L 6. An amendment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Restaurant to reflect the new manager was approved. 1 C _ 7. The final assessment hearing for Project 527, Lexington Square - storm sewer was continued indefinitely. 8. The final assessment roll for Project 487R, Braun Court - streets and storm sewer, was received and a public hearing scheduled to be held on April 4, 1989. �. The final assessment roll for Project 518, Eagan High School - utilities, was received and a public hearing ordered for April 4, 1989. 10. The specs for Maintenance Vehicle 0125, miscellaneous equipment and attachments, were approved and authorization given to advertise for a bid opening to be held at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 1989. 11. The 3rd and final payment for Contract 88-06, Braun Court - street and storm sewer, was approved. 12. The 5th and final payment for Contract 88-12, Eagan High School - utilities, was approved. 13. The 2nd and final payment for Contract 87-32C, Chapel Hill Addition - streets and utilities, was approved. 14. The petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road was received and a public bearing scheduled for April 4, 1989. 15. The Cooperative Power Association Lease Agreement for South Well Field "D", Fire Station #3, was approved. 16. The City Council expressed support for a pilot project using police personnel to assist with drug education in Eagan elementary schools starting in 1990. OLD BUSINESS ,_.a20. Contract 88-24, Lexington Ave - reservoir, was awarded to the lowest bidder. ULV1. The conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 foot tall, "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S 6 W Industrial Acres was continued to the June 6, 1989 City Council meeting. The staff was directed to review Chapter 4 of the City Code, those regulatory provisions relating to the sign ordinance and present modification to that ordinance. 22. A comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III to CPD was approved and sent to the Met Council for their review. The rezoning from AG to PD, a preliminary plat and a conditional use permit for pylon signs for the Park Center Addition project will be considered after Met Council review. 23. Action was taken to request a high priority for the widening of Cliff Road to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners between I -35E and Cliff Center. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. The public hearing for Project 546, Cedarvale Boulevard - restoration/ resurfacing, was approved and the public hearing closed. 18. The public hearing was closed and the vacation of the drainage and utility easement on Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Pond, was approved. 19. The public hearing was closed and the vacation of Heritage Lane, north of Yankee Doodle Road, was approved. OLD BUSINESS ,_.a20. Contract 88-24, Lexington Ave - reservoir, was awarded to the lowest bidder. ULV1. The conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 foot tall, "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S 6 W Industrial Acres was continued to the June 6, 1989 City Council meeting. The staff was directed to review Chapter 4 of the City Code, those regulatory provisions relating to the sign ordinance and present modification to that ordinance. 22. A comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III to CPD was approved and sent to the Met Council for their review. The rezoning from AG to PD, a preliminary plat and a conditional use permit for pylon signs for the Park Center Addition project will be considered after Met Council review. 23. Action was taken to request a high priority for the widening of Cliff Road to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners between I -35E and Cliff Center. 24. The preliminary plat (replat) for Oak Cliff 3rd Addition was approved. NEW BUS 25. The fiscal 1988 budget adjustments as prepared and presented were approved. 26. An additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle was approved. ZL&_27. A modification of the Cliff Lake Galleria sign agreement to permit the pylon sign and a monument sign to be relocated at Cliff Lake Center was approved. 28. The comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 1.4 agricultural acres to a limited business district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminary plat were continued indefinitely and with the understanding that the item would be sent back to the Advisory Planning Commission. 9. The comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 16.46 agricultural acres to a public facilities district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located east Lf �of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road were approved. T.j ' Direction was provided to designate certain parcels and surplus, ha6 including HUD parcels, in Lexington South to seek appraisals on the value of property. ADM MSTRATIVE AGENDA 1 31. The petition was received for Project 561, Sterns Addition - streets and utilities, and authorization was given for the preparation of a / feasibility report. 32. A public hearing was scheduled to vacate the public right-of-way, Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road, for April 4, 1989. 3. Authorization was given to settle the Wescott Garden Lots condemnation. t * * * t t !�[1�t�(.23�. All bills were approved and ordered paid. MINUTES OF REGULW.NEETIMG OF`TRE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MARC3f'-7; 1989 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, March 7, 1989, at 6:30 p.m:;a::;t3#e:•:gaa, Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and Egan, Gustafson and McCrea. Also present were City A!tinisftktor Tom Hedges, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Community*:Development Director Dale Runkle, City Planner Jim Sturm, Assista&.-City*.:—.gineer Mike Foertsch and City Attorney James Sheldon,:.::.;:;:::>':•::::•• City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended continuing Item C under the Consent Agenda (License, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, Pulltabs at,.Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South Robert Trail) to the Marcti::1-�r.:.,1989, City Council meeting. Wachter moved, McCrea as amended. All voted in f motion to approve the agenda February 21. 1989. Mayor Ellison requested the change on page 1, paragraph 4, correcting the name to "Mike Michou". Councilmember Egan requested the correction from Bonestroo representative to Dakota County„8•i.yhway:: Department representative, Dave Zeck, on pages 4 and:;:::: McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, tha'motion to approve the minutes for the February 21, 198*:k:reguUr Council meeting as amended. All voted in favor. RESOLUTION/FULL TRANSFER OF THE STATR'S MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TO THE HIGHWAY USER TAX DISTRIBUTION FUND Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch introduced the matter to the Council. Wachter moved, Egan second d:,.:.:. kt!e•:notion to approve the resolution to allow full ttajikket::::o AE;state Is motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tax—disfr'ili'utioa fund. All voted in favor. Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7,, 1989 POLICE .0 . EPARTMENT RNMANIZATION Chief of Police Pat Gft.,gan repopt.#A to the Council regarding the reorganization request. Coi*#A.-memW-*-t*39gan asked if a balance would ...:r ............. be maintained between the twd-* '1:1:0-0A -hints. Geagan responded yes. Egan requested a clarification regarding the administrative secretary. Mayor Ellison asked if this would achieve the Police Department's goal of constant supervision. Geagan responded yes,, on paper. Wachter moved, Gustaf -M... .......... C.:::*:the motion to approve the reorganization of the PoliEi'e"'*V***'A*"g-'t"'W'-e'�'ff"t'-.' .Management structure as presented. All voted in favor. DEPA4P T " RES T City Administrator Tdff`� Q'g'es''-:*t d a thank you letter from the O'Patrany grandparents. Chief Southorn informed the Council that the Eagan Fire Department was involved in controlling the NSP Black Dog fire. John Hohenstein distii.w**� ats from the recycling firm and stated the public response Va ' tas.t ' ic. Councilmember McCrea questioned where the containers w6r"':::'2"-i'f t. Mr. Bohenstein stated they should be at the doorstep. Item A. 1. Clerk/typist positions. a. Full-time clerk/typ.* to approve the hiring of vg completion of the City's phy . s J L'c a .'e'x -i" as b. Half-time clerk/typist i*'..COME recommended to continue the hirin*4':*:for 21, 1989, City Council meeting. ation. It was recommended subject to successful on requirements. ty Development. it was e position until the March c. Half-time clerk/typist in Parts Department. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Nancy Hammel subject to the successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. Item B. Plumbers Licel) ....... It was recommended to approve the..8-.-.plumbing licenses and 1 water softener license as presented. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Item C. It was recommended to City Council meeting. item to the March 21, 1989, It was recommended to. pg�Ep-P:--an.,amendment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Restaural t:: iD::ll` kik i a new manager (Judy Johnson, 1400 47th Avenue, Columb#a Heights). Item E. 21 - Storm Sewer). It was recommended to continue indefinitely the scheduled final assessment hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer). Item F. It was recommended to'`""rec3;Fe Project 487R (Braun Court - Street public hearing to be held on Aril Item G. e final assessment roll for . Storm Sewer) and schedule a It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll for Project 518 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and order the public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. Item H. Maintenance Vg-:: Approve Specs/Authorize Ad for Bids (Miscellaneous Ea+' +ten *'--i'++-''A*fachments) It was recommended to approvie the *becifications for Maintenance Vehicle No. 125 (Miscellaneous Ec'tlpmenV::and Attachments) and authorize the advertisement for a"bid opening to be held at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 1989. Item I. Contract 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Streets and Storm Sewer). It was recommended to approve the'. ird and final payment for Contract 88-06 (Braun Court;..-..;Stz.aat..,S3�d;.Storm Sewer) and accept the project for perpetual maint ....t It was recommended to AftX...00 ::.)ie fifth and final payment for Contract 88-12 (Sagan High School - Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. Item R. It was recommended to appr Contract 87-32C (Chapel Hill Ad accept the project for perpetuo Item L. Road) . nce. and final payment for s and Utilities) and It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989.::::.:. Item M. It was recommended to app.-qV*:::t-he6':Vooperative Power Association Lease Agreement for South kIell-'s eYd 'D" (Fire Station No. 3) and authorize the Mayor and Ci. £y"A erk to execute all related documents. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda items as amended and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. DRUG AwAli$IiSS::>:iSTCE EDUCATION City Administrator Tom Hedges:infcikmed the Council that staff was considering a program for fifth grafi drug education to be conducted by the Police Officers,.:,:, Chief of Police Pat Geagan explained the program which would consist of one hour per week for 17 weeks. Be stated the course was very structured and that there was a training program involved. The Lions Club would pay for the travel expenses. Be further stated that January of 1990 was the soonest the pr gg am could begin. Councilmember McCrea efiaL d r3h.'s.:: #-t there should be grant money available for the payment e;tikgs*des;;:$he felt there should not be duplication on different levels and that:.:the program should be coordinated. She stated the children's?:v.iew point should not be overlooked. Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 19.89 Mayor Ellison felt tli* money would:' -be well spent as the program was a very worthy endeavor:::::::.. Councilmember Gustafson :at:;t3are was tremendous pressure every year to add hours to currf;i4i..: He felt the program was needed. City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council no action was necessary on the matter. PROJECT 546/CRDARVALB BO.MAiRb:�:' STRSBT RBSURFACIIiG) Assistant City Engineer Mike;FoertAth updated the Council on the matter. Bob Freegard (OSM) presented the`'details of the feasibility report to the Council. Be reviewed the location, structure of pavement, repairs needed and the overlay. Be reported that the project would provide uniform width and he outlined the storm sewer improvements. Be showed the assessment areas and presented the estimated cost. Councilmember Egan questi:dffad;:;th;e:::;storm sewer improvements. Mr. Freegard described the nature::Of the hiprovements. Councilmember Wachter questioned the change5::;made.:?C1#: he west end. Mr. Freegard described the changes. Councilmember Gustafsifn asked why the north properties were not assessed. Mr. Freegard stated those properties had their own service road. Mr. Gustafson stated the other properties also had a service road. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch informed the Council that those service roads were part of. the gas station property and that it was a private access drive: 64i' Councilmember Egan questionod:::the 1-0.8 contingency. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that 0const;i:uction had more unknowns than new construction. Councilmember Gustafson indicated that Rahn Road should also be upgraded. Councilmember McCrea concurred and stated that Rahn Road was in bad shape. Public Works Director Tom Colbert pointed out that the neighboring residents opposed a past proposal to upgrade Rahn Road. Assistant City Enginee.c:;::K ke:;::$Qs;,.zsch emphasized that the assessments were consistenti:iih::::ia6t::::actices. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the melon to close the public hearing and approve Project 546 (CedarV410 Boulevard - Restoration/Resurfacing) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. All voted in favor. Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 VACATE DRAINAGE A116:QTILITY EA IMSNT (LOT 15, BLOCS 1F E�tTQ1F3NDS) Assistant City Engineer M1Ce"'Poertsch supplied the information regarding the petition for the Council. He informed the Council that the petitioner requested a two-week continuance of the matter to further review the landscaping. Mayor Ellison questift."", aFi >g£fi tt that would have on the Council action. Mr.Foertsch staiod the ;would be no effect. Councilmember Egan commented that the matter should not be continued. McCrea moved, Egan sec.9n4 :#;ice:tiption to close the public hearing and approve the vaca1fflh a::e drainage and utility easement for Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. VACATE A PORTION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY (HERITAGE LANE - NORTH .;QF YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) Assistant City Engine6r'-`Mz(te::::R9.ertsch furnished an update on the matter for the Council. Egan moved, Wachter seco;5led;.:' } :kbtion to close the public hearing and approve the va.cat 04. df'a portion of street right-of-way (Heritage Lane - North of :3F�iike"e Doodle Road), and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. AWARD CONTRACT/LEXINGTON AVENUE - RESERVOIR (CONTRACT ... $$-24/P.ROJECT 538A) City Administrator Tom""'HPi ggpAidmriatized the background on the matter. City Attorney Jim Sheldo>}:4nforiegd the Council that a verbal commitment had been received from:hhe ff:tle insurance company and that the matter could be closed next w4iiA. Assistant City Engineer informed the Council that the City couiif::proceed with the contract award. Egan moved, Wachter secondedF the motion to award Contract 88-24 (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) to Brown,.Tank Minneapolis of Eagan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to eifecute all related documents. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PERltI;' 6"::iODTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGN City Administrator Tom Hedges intr�uced the item to the Council and stated that the APC recommended derd-41 of the application. Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Community Development.:. -Director Dale Runkle summarized the application and stated the::e,ize of tb :::;sign exceeded criteria. City Administrator Tom Hedges st4:;the::?4+itstanding obligations should be stricken and could be added date. Councilmember McCrea asked for a review of the rules"regarding financial obligations. Mr. Hedges stated that a plat or a waiver of plat is the triggering action. McCrea stated she felt the City should be consistent. Arthur Dean (Naegele):tgpoKY.#c3i;kY the site meets the criteria of the present sign ordinan�e••:*.l he felt the size of the sign was an issue but that the Councl3�:had:lowed larger signs in the past. He explained that the size..of the". - sign was an industry standard. He submitted a list g#::; agar Advertisers who have used Naegele signs and stated 1�at::::#f:r,#*;jit'allow advertisers to move about. Councilmember Egan questioned if the height of the sign met City Code. Mr. Runkle stated yes. Mr. Egan pointed out that the Council had previously discussed the location of freeway signs and questioned if this sign met that criteria. Mr. Runkle stated yes and that it was one of the few sites remain 'ha:... Mayor Ellison requested use' concept. Mr. Dean expla have principle use language, same. He stated that Naegel:e. sign. tlbn regarding the "principle Eagan ordinance did not iEAhe results were basically the ike businesses to retain the City Attorney Jim Sheldon described Eagan's ordinance and stated that the City had determined that 250 feet was appropriate. He indicated that if larger signs were requested, standards should be set forth in the ordinance..........::............... Mayor Ellison suggested 'a.rev2ta'of'•the billboard ordinance. Mr. Hedges stated he felt that it wa*::a gogl:point and that it had been about seven years since the ordii4nce w.as reviewed. He stressed that the City of Eagan was changing rgpidly::::Vouncilmember Egan emphasized that if the City set reasonable standards, it could avoid problems. Councilmember McCrea expressed her concerns and stated that she felt Eagan should never resemble South Robert Street. She pointed out that she was previously on the sign committee. Mayor Ellison recommended reviewiat other municipalities' sign ordinances regarding spacing, size, prli+ciple'use, etc. He requested that the applicant in this...wat:te:s:;:be.:::I. oluded in staff discussions. Mr. Runkle informed the CoOO.,.t :tea .-W if June 1 would be a reasonable time for response back to the;Council. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the:.Notion to continue to the June 5, 1989, City Council meeting the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 foot tall, •v° shaped Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 billboard advertising sign*;*O'n Lot 2, BI - 6 - dk It S & W Industrial Acres, to allow further research i6f...the billb6ikrd ordinance. All voted in favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMMMUT/PM CENTER ADDITION/FEDERAL LAND COMPANY City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that the APC had considered the applicat-4--#4m subaft-ted by Federal Land Company ... .......... ive Guide Plan Amendment and recommended a denial oU:;tbW:::g"Vr- e;hs and rezoning. Community Development DireV'ar Dat#Iunkle reviewed the site plan with the Council and made-:44&r4q!nVW:to the BRA Option K. Be informed the Council that t'*h*'4'*:%:':"d"'j'5 . pl'! t.gt- 1 6 n had been reviewed with the City Attorney. Martin Colon (Federal Land Company) announced that he was prepared to give a full presentation if requested by the Council. In regard to the traffic matter_, ' he stated he had met with Sorenson and Colbert and that eventuall.y�j�::�prpbably 1991# Cliff Road would be a six -lane road. He stated th j ft:gu.ration would be similar to Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Colon explained that '&4ybr counted all trees in excess of 6 inches in width -a -ii 'r e feet tall and that the count was approximately 180 . He s"il'iMthe trees were concentrated in the northwest corner near the senior citizens site. He observed that if the plan proceeded, 208 to 25% of the trees would be saved if the office buildings were installed. He explained that if the BRA plan was approved, up to 338 of the trees could be saved. He reported that Federal Land Company when the development was completed. Councilmember McCrea asked *'hOn th""'.:.center would open. Mr. Colon stated it would open either when ' Ehe fiJikl placement of Cliff Road was completed (about 1991) or whfifi'..:the.nterim construction could be accomplished, including the widening andii ignalizing of the westerly access point. He stated this would solve the problem. He announced that the developer would assume the cost of the upgrade. Councilmember McCrea suggested using the Target lot as a prototype for saving trees. Mr. Colon si-fitted the developer was willing to make that commitment. Councilmember Egan qud;gt1-iiie'B::: in other areas of the development would be saved. He also questioned what type of interim improvements were needed. Mr. Colon into"'it'imed the Council that the developer was willing to pursue any inte-tim options set out by the County and the City engineers. Mr. Egan questioned if it would be an "either/or" proposition. Assistant City Engineer responded yes. Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1969 Councilmember McCrea questioned if Federal Land could open earlier if the temporary provisions w�tg made. It ::Colon stated yes. Mayor Ellison recommended that th�&;:;�;ity.;abQ4lid encourage the upgrading as top priority. Councilmember t+�tiehs:t�uestioned if the County approval was for the two entrances off of"Cliff Road. Mr. Colon responded that it was only preliminary. Mr. Foertsch informed the Council that the County had not reviewed the study and would not do so until March 13. Be stated that the 1991 or 1992 upgrade was not official. Councilmember McCrea istafe''ip:cil could approve a resolution. City Administrator Hedgeg commented that staff could reprioritize the capital improvments ],.an. City Attorney Jim Shei:]q is sm Yd i. d that it was a sensitive area and that whichever di ecfion•.EnE`:Council went, there would be criticism and perhaps a lawsuit. Be informed the Council of two alternatives: I. Obtain additional information and facts regarding use of the entire Park Center site a$:;.a:multi-family development. II. 1. Send the CPD Comprehensive 6u d$'::Plan Metropolitan Council for;?:i:ev:i2k!+> 2. Send the west part::l' fhe Park Center begin action for rezoning that property Amendment to the property to the APC to to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to prepare the following: a. Resolution sive Guide Plan. b. Resolution a 6ii pproving::t 'E� rezoning and entering into the Planned Development AgX0.emenk:::Tor the eastern part of the property to Commercial:;E!lanned;:Development uses. C. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat of the eastern part of the property with the western part of the property as shown as an outlot. d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to reviAf;te: Ex4 atd Option Agreement with the HRA and Federal Land for acggi6ition of the eastern part of the property. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 g. Settlement Agzgement for .the condemnation lawsuit between the City: i6f Eagan aisti4ederal Land for acquisition of the pond and dtit!ents on the Park Center property.. Mayor Ellison asked how the Metropolitan Council received authority to rezone in Eagan. Mr. Sheldon stated the authority was given by the state legislature and he further explained the history. Councilmember McCrea cb�6fit'> #ia : she thought the Comprehensive Guide Plan was a guide. "e stated the changes in the surrounding land use had not affected this parcel and questioned how a lawsuit could be generated.1!'':%%i.ShelGlp1 stated that a lawsuit would not mean that the Council di:,d,•;:�a A "h:.::siiong. McCrea stated the City had not received a lawsuit:fa 'quia`hile. Councilmember Gustafson questioned that if the Council needed to take a procedure, what assurance would the developer have. He stated he leaned toward the proposed type of development and questioned if the resolutions would coverthese concerns. Mr. Sheldon stated that. the procedure was consistdi.. :::with the last five Planned Development Agreements and that all part3{�::.thpuld understand the position. Mr. Sheldon also commentedthat'))* 120 day limit applied only to the preliminary plat and ttiat..:;i�e:::applicant should agree to the continuance. Councilmember Egan suggested the Council act on only two matters at the present time: (1) recommend change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan; or (2) rezone to Multi Residential. Councilmember Wachter suggested also including sending it to Dakota County. Councilmember Egan queattd8:e:i!fet Council's timeframe. Community Development Dir6'&di"Da]'e"i(uri'kle stated it could be anywhere from 10 to 90 days and tih�t tli0:::traffic studies would be reviewed.X. Councilmember Gustafson questioned -'::chat if the. City sent the matter to the Metropolitan Council and it approved, could the City still change its mind. Councilmember Egan stated the record was clearly established and that in 1984, the Council refused rezoning on the basis of excess commercial in Eagan...Since that time, there has been substantial change in the area. He:.-'�gjtated that the plan is very sensitive and that the developer demonAi ated that D -III would be spot zoning. He further stat�:d::::that::,tha ..rttudy showed that the area is ripe for further retail zor"siiq Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the 4{tion to: I. Approve and send the CPD Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Park Center Addition to the Metropolitan Council for review. Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 2. Send the west part j0f. the Park:::: enter property to the APC to begin action for rezori patK.bperty to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to phi ie the following: a. Resolution amending the Comprehensive Guide Plan. b. Resolution apprift-ft :::.hip..::!r-.ezoning and entering into the Planned Developmpiit- A4}feei6eiit::: or the eastern part of the property to Commercial. -.1 #::Development uses. c. Resolution approvi ?;.the ftpliminary Plat of the eastern part of the proPe:;:ty:vTit{t..t:vestern part of the property as shown as an ou ld, d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to reviQia:kh€,.executed Option Agreement with the ARA and Federal LAftil::;€4::acquisition of the eastern part of the property. g. Settlement Agreempt:;fpiC::::the condemnation lawsuit between the City ..of: Na:s3'aii'"and Federal Land for acquisition of the pond and ut3.f'ty easements on the Park Center property. All voted in favor. Councilmember Egan stAted.the.;:appl:icant agrees to continue the preliminary plat applicatiaii:; Wachter moved, Gustafson se Ca:pded,:tihe motion to approve a resolution requesting Dakota County upgrade Cliff Road between I -35E and Cliff Center. All voted in fajor. PRELIMINARY PLAT/OAE CLIFF 3RD ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the matter to the Council. Community Development Director::Dale Runkle summarized the application. Assistant City Engineer Milo& Foertsch informed the Council that staff did not recall making's commitment to the developer regarding unasse@54!:::fi?fs�ii::obligations. Councilmember Egan referenced Tom.W. bert's letter dated March 2, 1988, to Tom Hedges. He stated that:afie Council alone would make those determinations. Councilmember Wactiter noted that even if staff had made commitments, it would not be binding. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7. 1989 ............. Saul Bernick distribd ' ed a packet..�o the Council, including an .- Affidavit from Greg Soule. -::::Re informe&*t-'be Council that Mr. Schlangen ....... ..... . contested the new special aV4MswPent*:V . nd believed it was a 9i*id-:::t.-Uit at no time was anyone aware settlement negotiation. He that such an assessment would e-'9 f -s: -:-t-.- He announced that they felt it was a binding agreement. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the Owner had a duty to inquire as to the authority ii:i::Nt::::r.at:te..mated that the City enters into all agreements through Councilmember Wachter emphasized that every parcel MUO:.:pay -ft financial obligations. . Mr. Bernick pointed out thg't'.theyi*d relied on the City's actions. City Administrato.r.:... ",.d X -TOM .: ges.*Xecapped the procedure for the City requiring avail abil i. Bernick stated that the assessment was arbitrary. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch commented that the review with Mr. Wobschall was to identify and explain the assessments. Councilmember Egan stated the City would not negotiate on the basis of supposed statements by Wobschall. City Attorney James hie 2*don stated that only unimproved property could be deferred. Mr. Hed4iiii:iijitited. it should either be included or waived. Mr. Sheldon commented.:..tE'g'i:::�iii�:-Schlangen must determine what is owed and who has authority�::.Council-mqiinber Egan questioned if the Council needed to establish a Sheldon stated it could be waived. Mayor Ellison pointed' -but that the City needed to recover these costs and that a deferment would be a good compromise. Egan moved, Wachter preliminary plat (replat) of two lots (2.91 acres) the west side of Slater F quarter of Section 31, as the following conditions: seconded, the motion to approve the submi 1. The standard conditions Council action on September 15l B2r B4, Clr C2r C4t DI, Ell Fl, ed.Dak..Cliff 3rd Addition consisting ,, acres) located along t K.:-df::::aIff Road in the northwest tW by;tobert Schlangen, subject to of plat*:::*&pproval as adopted by 1987, shall be complied with: All Bl, and Gl. 2. Lot I shall be reviewed by the,City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised landscaM:-:.plam-:.shal.:-I--:be submitted for Lot 1 based ":*:": *� ...... .................. on current landscape policy"...*":,:V'._A" to the final plat submission. 4. The development is required to:;*a;ad a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 5. The development is rft-jgred t.q:jp ;Dvide sewer and water service to each platted par 6. Subject to a written agreement to allow assessment, the assessible cost shall be deferred and assessed to OUtlot B. All voted in favor. Councilmember Gustafson he: aske-i:4f ::� 0.. Was correct in that the City did not propose assessments at thi::*'0"ther::)ftages. Mr. Foertsch stated he was correct. Mr. Gustafson rept ed thzt.:he felt uncomfortable when the City missed it so many ti.mesj&t aji4ed it was a compromise. GENERAL FUND BUDGET JWJUSR'IIBP/DECEMBER 31, 1988 City Administrator Tom Hedges described the adjustments to the Council and stated that the matter could be considered at the work session. Councilmember McCrea a2Md:-::&f--:-:A.e legal fees had been under -estimated for 1988. Mr.that lawsuits make up a certain portion of the legal fe#s and. further stated that Hauge received all of his payments la: ' 6� * t yea-r:;';�*W. explained that the transition caused doubling of 14% -'X:-:--�%D%6-'-a'-'f-S- but that the revenue would offset it. McCrea questionec):�:�i'f..i:.�:..'t'�le 1989 legal fees would also increase. Mr. Hedges stated:'11fit revenue sources are tight and that the City would need to do tight monthly forecasting. He informed the Council that the 1989 budget would be monitored closely. McCrea suggested taking a look at the engineering provisions. She requested good projections. She felt there was a need for an in-house policy in regards to contacting consul:t stated that it should ar L1,r:- -:ibd:-::b6htact the attorneys. strictly be a legal matter Councilmember McCrea emphasized thAt she -.vas not saying that the fees were too high, just recommending t)iat it:O:*.** .ould be monitored. Councilmember Egan indicated ifiat tW projected budget increased by 408 and that the City should take a 166k at the matter. Be stated that the revenues were not increasing as fast as the expenditures. He felt the City could not count on permits and fees to handle the budget. City Administrator Tom Hedges expla: d that 1989 would have upward adjustments to the rev RA er explained the budgeting process. .... . Mayor Ellison commented that the City -.:had a higher contingency amount at the present time. He stated thiit:lthe City also estimated revenues more liberally and felt that the City should begin to estimate revenues more conservatively. Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the. -.Motion to approve the fiscal 1988 budget adjustments ad:. esented: *1 voted in favor. VARIANCE/BUILDING #W0f !MCB/VILLAUME INDUSTRIES Community Development Director Dale Runkle briefed the Council on the application. Nick Linsmeier (Plant:;Dltttd: t—.:J:::::W firmed the Council that the hardship was for fire safety' 'r'e'aseiri:: explained the layout and the type of product of the industry ie fui~ther explained the flow of people through the building. Mayor Ellison questioiierl;::R+(fyfa::(plicant did not consider moving the entry further riCYtii: Mr :::L"fnsmeier stated the proposed location is located where the old entrance is. Mr. Runkle disclosed that the issue regarding the parking on the street should be resolved. Councilmember Wachter had concerns regarding the parking requirements. Mayor Ellison questioned if more stalls could be added. Mr :-"*peier addressed the parking concerns and stated more stalls couid-:'fiol:b*t":added but that there was enough parking in the lot. Councilmember OViiiifson asked what was wrong with parking in the street. Egan moved, Wachter se#ti?i7"the motion to continue the matter to the March 21, 1989, Citi: -.6 uacil meeting in regard to the additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle. Mayor Ellison stated •he:;•€e : ;:;4he:; W.o matters should not be linked together and that Ye::Y3tk3e::siiould be decided on its own merits. Councilmember Egan statedhe felt the two were linked together. Egan and Wachter voted in f &6r; 4:3ison, Gustafson and McCrea voted against. The motion failed. McCrea moved, Ellison seconded, the motion to approve an additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Ea�andale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle} subject to the condition that the applicant work with the City staff to assure adequate parking. All voted in favor::;::::;::::;:'.: Councilmember Wachter questioned i;.:the matter met City Code. Councilmember Egan questioned the requ x'Vments of the Code. City Attorney Jim Sheldon cited City Code 11A0. Councilmember Gustafson reviewed the hardship with the developer. Page 15/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 CLIFF LASE GALLXRIA SIGN A M E MEN T MODIFICATION Community DevelopmenIE':::#J-Xector...:l'M*I*iB Runkle explained the modification to the sign ag"k*"e'*'A"%"P*'0'*'********"'6**d .0""Ok stated that the City's sign inspector had reviewed the mailii: , A"*nd indicated there was nothing which would prohibit consideration of the request. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a modification of the Cliff:ir-.4(t; I -ar:i:a:::Sign Agreement to permit the pylon sign and a monument:::'g"i-'q''6':';*k':6"e*,:*:,':"r*"*,***I"bcated at Cliff Lake Center as presented. All voted in favoe.:.-.:: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDJfifLAN A*NDMENT/REZ0N331Q/ OUTLOT ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that a letter had been received from the developer requesting a continuance. Rollie Crawford (developer) informed the Council that the developer is seriously rethinking the entire request and would return before the APC if the pla�...'.vEgs....changed. ........ Councilmember Egan asked i'f-%,*+.-4*&K'.— as an engineering report. Community Development Direct6.4Dale Runkle stated that the applicant had requested review without:'W, Ellison remarked that the developer should let tb -O'Widil air its commercial concerns. Mr. Crawford stated the develo-Or.- -:;-Vanted to re-evaluate the entire situation. Councilmember McCrea asked for the length of the continuance requested. Mr. Crawford stated indefinite and reiterated that the developer was willing to 9() .. bacX..baf9.re the APC. McCrea complimented the developer on its atti .... ....... ... the request. Egan moved, McCrea seconded -":::::the 9"*".tion to continue indefinitely the Comprehensive Guide Plan Ame#*aent--.-'a%'.jnd rezoning of 1.4 Agricultural acres to a Limited fiosine' Silv:district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminaiy plai.'::'to allow the developer to review the entire request, with the condition that if the plan changes, the matter will be referred back to the Advisory Planning Commission. All voted in favor. )MPREHEWSIVE GUIDE PLAN A=WDKENT/REZON331Q/ PRELIMINARY PLAT/STERES MbITION/ISD #196 City Administrator T X0.duced the matter to the ...... Council. Community Developme*nt"D'i*i"e*"'c**t"oi*.'.Pale Runkle stated the architects were available to discuss th'e"'::bus access issue. Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7. 1989 ...... . ..... Kevin Sullivan (Wold..A.ssociation).....thanked the staff for their consideration in the handl.;'l ter and stated he was available for questions. Mayor Ellison asked Mr. Sullivan if he were comfortable with the bus circulation. Mr. Sullivan responded yes. Coancilmember Egan questioned if the City bad reviewed the matter. Public Works Director Tom Colbert replied that staff had reviewed the matter and was also evaluating the over -flow &0 %.cial events and increasing u . the width of Dodd Road. Cdn'd"**"%'1-1ft ib4 t- ..O.chter questioned the access width. Mr. Sullivan explained t1i ::widtfi:..:-Mr. Wachter questioned if the parking would be adequate foLic..speci-Al events. Mr. Sullivan reported that the residential are- ,be used and that it is the past practice of the School .es mU$;.t. ".i. use residential areas. li* McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from Mixed Residential to Public Facilities (schools), as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterna Addition. All voted in favor. Wachter moved, Egan si motion to approve a rezoning of 16.46 Agricultural acres t.a.. a PU .,Fa cil i ties district, as submitted by Independent Scho.;6-1 No. 196 - Sterns Addition. All voted in favor. Egan moved, McCrea se�hdbd, the motion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary school located east of Dodd Road and south of Backmore Drive (extended) in the north half of Section 25, as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterns Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard condt iik-:ipproval as adopted by Council action on September 15# !9'81_1's'ha*l'l be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3r B4, Cl, C2F C5, DI, El ail:4 G.I. 2. The development will be i:6auir4*to limit post -development phosphorus export levels to pre-develoMbnt levels. 3. City staff to review the grading plan and the School District to be required to remove the drainage from the Schramm property. 4. The development will be requirto submit a landscape plan which defines the boundary of the scho6l':'and the Schramm property. S. The School District-,.".'t4-h-ld adjoining property owners of the discrepancy in the survey. .....X.: All voted in favor. Page 17/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 BUD P0%:BASZ/ SOUTH City Administrator Tomthe Council on the background of the matter. V01, Councilmember McCrea requested further clarification. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that BUD would only sell the entire parcel. Councilmember selling the land (for this parcel) but retaining the Daniel Drive. Councilmember Wachter requesied':'tffie amizipt of acreage being sold. Community Development Director Dale Runkle stated it was approximately 17 acres. ....... X -o Councilmember McCrea :q:6ittioh":::,-1-*f Brad Swenson incurred the legal costs. City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated he was sure there were some costs which were incurred and suggested the Council have the land appraised. Councilmember Egan had concerns regarding title problems. Egan moved, Wachter fiEnded, the motion to give direction to the City staff as follows: .... . . 1. The HUD property locat;iod at.tj�t.:�:Zouthwest corner of Lexington o: Avenue and Diffley Road is t:4)*--: Aik .**:- It - r the reservoir site. V . ...... . . .. . 2. The following pro&'.*-'t-iy :.... is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was required and shall be designated surplus and should be appraised for sale as follows: a. The northerly extension of Daniel Drive at Diffley Road to be appraised with the intan R-1 property. b. The property along thi east of Walnut Hills Park of Wilderness Run Road and ised as R-1 or R-2. c. The portion of the previO.4'sly P'*'4";'.-'Oposed Soderholm Addition at the northwest corner of Lexington:44enue/Diffley Road to be appraised with the intent to sell as R-4 or Commercial. All voted in favor. PROJECT 561/RECEIVE PETITION/OAftR FEASIBILITY REPORT (STERNS ADDITION - STREEft'AND UTILITIES) Egan moved, Gustafson-*.-:*0.,W---ft- :motion to receive the 7 petition for Project 561 (Sterns Addition - Streets and Sewers) and authorize the preparation of a feasibiIiii-t-'y report. All voted in favor. Page 18/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 PETITION TO VACATE PLIC RIGHTS=WAY (BGAH AVB90B - VILAS LANE':11};ILQ'. OB ROAD) Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a public hearing to vacate the public right-of-way (Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) for April 4, 1989. All voted in favor. City Administrator Tom Hedges st approved by the state but that kh;E co move. Mr. Hedges also eta been resolved. the Town Hall Grant was not would fund a portion of the rsha Bussey water matter had Mr. Hedges referenced his memorandum regarding the Community Center and stated it was a draft only. Councilmember Egan me #;f9Aed..to the Council that the City of Chanhassen was utilizing TIF'fot:::?Community Center. Community Development Di)tgctor,;DaI.0.:Runkle updated the Council on the Seneca project. Public Works Director.:''1`6i' Colbert presented an update on Dodd Road/494 upgrade. Councilmember Wachter had concerns regarding airplane noise. Councilmember Gustafs4n•:aekeci:;€:;:,tt►e Council would conduct a workshop on the ref erendumakt4:rsri Ellison stated a workshop was scheduled for March 28, 1989,.;an8 that the workshop could partially be devoted to the topic;.:. Councilmember Gustafson had<:tionceixf* regarding "discovered assessments' and he stated that they seem to come up often and questioned if they could all be found at once. Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained the process. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated that the City collects what it can. Mayor Ellison commended the Public.s?porks Department in the admirable job of clearing the snow at tfA last snow storm. Mayor Ellison stated was looking good and that an ice arena was being proposed; Councilmember Egan had concerns r oiirding the Council packet for the meeting and stated that he felt the conditions were becoming skimpy. Public Works Director Tom Colbert responded that because of Page 19/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 _.... .............::::.. the necessity of many Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to settle the Wescott Garden Lots Condemnation. All voted in favor. No= ; �o, sem__ — Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to approve the checklist dated February 28, 1989..in tb:e:amount of $527,288.53; the checklist dated March 6, 1989.,J-h::the 4Wbnt of $128,278.97; and the checklist dated March 7, T!:xr 't#::'d9iiiunt of $217,512.26. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk AGENDA jl-� REGULAR MEETING SAGAN CITY COUNCIL KAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MARCH 7, 1989 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1. Approve Resolution Recommending Full Transfer of the State's Motor Vehicle Excise Tax to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund B. POLICE DEPARTMENT P 1. Reorganization IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) Q' A. PERSONNEL ITEMS P• B. LICENSE, Plumbers p 1 C C. LICENSE, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, Pull Tabs at Richards Food 1 & Liquor, 4185 S. Robert Trail p l3 D. LICENSE, Liquor, New Manager/La Fonda De Acebo, 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy 1 (q E. PROJECT 527, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Square Storm Sewer) Continue (� Indefinitely 14F. PROJECT 487R - Receive Final Assessment Role/Order Public Hearing (Braun Court) G. PROJECT 518, Receive Final Assessment Role/Order Public Hearing (Eagan High ' School - Utilities) H. MAINTENANCE VEHICLE #125, Approve Specifications/Authorize Advertisement for Bids (Miscellaneous Equipment & Attachments) P• '� I. CONTRACT 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Streets & Storm Sewer) � R -J. CONTRACT 88-12, Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagan High school - Utilities) P,1(, K. CONTRACT 87-32C, Final Payment/Acceptance (Chapel Hill Addition - Street & ' Utilities) P•n��L. PETITION to Vacate Portion of Public Right -of -Way (Auge Road) �a M. APPROVE Cooperative Power Association Lease Agreement/Fire Station #3/Well & Pumphouse V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) p7 -OA. PROJECT 546, Cedarvale Boulevard (Street Repair/Resurfacing) 1 •,(DAB. VACATION of Drainage and Utility Easement (Lot 15,.Block 1, Chatterton Ponds) C. VACATION of a Portion of Public Right -of -Way (Hertiage Lane - North of Yankee Doodle) VI. OLD BUSINESS (GRAY)', p 10 A. CONTRACT 88-24, Receive Bids/Award Contract, Lexington Avenue - Reservoir \p• '�\ B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Naegele Outdoor Advertising, To Allow a Billboard 1 Advertising Sign in a LI (Light Industrial District on Lot 2, Block 1, SSW pA Industrial Acres, Along Highway 13 in SWk of Section 19 o C. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, Park Center Addition/Federal Land Company, Changing the Land Designation from D -III Mixed Residential (Approximately 21.3 Acres) to C.P.D. (Commercial Planned Development) a REZONING from AG (Agricultural) to a Planned Development District, a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of Six Lots and a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Pylon Signs Located Along the North Side of Cliff Road, West of Rahn Road in the SE 1/4 of Section 3 P,r� ,D. PRELIMINARY PLAT, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition/Robert Schlangen, Replat Consisting of Two Lots (2.91 Acres) and One Outlot (6.06 Acres) Located Along the West Side of Slater Road South of Cliff Road in the NW 1/4 of Sec 31 VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) OA * A. 12-31-88 General Fund Budget Adjustment 0 �Lp5 B. VARIANCE, Villaume Industries, Inc., for 18' Variance from the right-of-way located on Lot 5 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 (2926 Lone Oak Circle) (�,�� C. MODIFICATION To Cliff Lake Galeria Sign Agreement 1 031D. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PIAN AMENDMENT, James Horne, Changing the Land Use \` Designation from D -II (Mixed Residential) to LB (Limited Business), a REZONING of 1.4 AG (Agricultural) Acres to a LB (Limited Business) District on Outlot C of the Preliminary Platted Kingswood 2nd Addition Located Along the West Side of Pilot Knob Road, South of Wescott Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 21 E. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PIAN AMENDMENT, Sterns Addition/Independent School District #196, Changing the Land Use Designation from D -II (Mixed Residential), to E (Schools), a REZONING of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) Acres to a PF (Public Facilities) District, and a PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of One Lot for an Elementary School Located East of Dodd Road and South of Hackmore Drive (Extended) in the N 1/2 of Sec 25 F. DISCUSS/PROVIDE DIRECTION, HUD Parcels Within the Lexington South Planned `+ e' Development VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (COLA) IB. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) ICI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR i CITY CO FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 1, 1989 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MARCH 7, 1989 CITY COUNCIL IMTIHG After approval is given to the March 7, 1989, agenda, and special minutes for Thursday, February 16, 1989, meeting and regular meeting minutes for February 21, 1989, the following items are in order for consideration. PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Approve Resolution Allowing Full Transfer of the State's Motor Vehicle Excise Tax to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund --The City Engineer's Association of Minnesota (CEAM) has been closely following recent legislation as it pertains to the financing of the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. This is the general source of revenue for the Municipal State Aid System (MSAS) incorporating approximately 38.8 miles of streets within our community. During the recent past, there was considerable effort expended at the state legislature to help ensure a steady source of revenue for the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund. Part of this was the transfer of the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) to this fund. However, the 1988 legislature approved a bill that would progressively reduce the amount of transfer to zero in 1992. For comparative purposes, had this transfer been eliminated effective 1989, the City of Eagan would have lost approximately $56,000 in MSAS allocations. Therefore, the Director of Public Works is recommending that the resolution enclosed on pages ._2 and 3 (as recommended by the CEAM) be adopted by the City Council and forwarded to our appropriate legislative representatives. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/deny the resolution regarding funding for street construction in Minnesota. CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION RE: FUNDING FOR STREET CONSTRUCTION IN MINNESOTA Res. No. 1989-1 WHEREAS, the City Engineers Association is composed of over 100 members throughout Minnesota representing nearly every city over 5000 population in the state; and WHEREAS, its members are particularly aware of the transportation needs of the cities and counties in the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the street and highway system is deteriorating at a,rate faster than the financial ability to maintain and rebuild it; and WHEREAS, transportation funding is a high priority issue of 1989; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to use road user funds for major street and road construction rather than using property tax; and WHEREAS, county and city government highway and street plans are predicated on proceeds from the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET), many county and city plans will be cut back or not completed. WHEREAS, the percent of local participation in the construction and reconstruction of state owned highways is increasing. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that City Engineers Association of Minnesota, meeting January 19, 1989, recommends that the 1989 session of the Legislature provide for the transfer of 1008 of the MVET to the road user fund to provide a stable source of adequate funding for the construction and maintenance of streets and highways in the state. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the •sunset• provision included in the 1988 Transportation Funding Bill be removed so that MM revenue can continue to go to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund so that it can be used for city streets and county roads in the State of Minnesota. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting H. POLICE Item 1. Reorganisation of Department Management Personnel— Enclosed on page 5 is a memorandum from Chief of Police Geagan regarding a proposed reorganization of a Police Department management structure. As outlined, the reorganization would eliminate the position of Administrative/Investigation Captain and provide for a reassignment of certain duties to the newly created positions of Patrol Lieutenants which is included in the 1989 budget. The proposal also provides for the creation of a new position of Lieutenant in Charge of Investigation. This position would likewise assume certain duties of the abolished Captain's position while eliminating the Investigative Sergeant's position for the balance of 1989. The organizational chart enclosed on page (o reflects the organizational structure which would result as a consequence of the proposal. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the reorganization of the Police Department management structure as presented. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be forwarded to the Governor, the Commissioner of transportation, and to the members. of the 'State Legi"slature,., Unanimouslypassed and adopted at their annual 'meeting this 19th, day of` January, 1989- (3 Segtetary President OF police department PATR=1 GEAG N! CNet of Poke OP@Mft eCap:dn 3830 PNOt Knob Rood VIC E1190N Eogon Mineola 55722 MOM Phone: WZ 454-3900 THOMAS EGM February 28, 1989 DAVID KGUSTAFSON PA%MA MCCREA THEC OM WAGHIER TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR THOMAS HEDGES �h'�� aN AaaiYamb FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POL CI E VANKE CRY cbn SUBJECT: EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT REORGANIZATION As you are aware, my recent appointment to the position of Chief of Police has created a vacancy in the Department's Management Team. That coupled with budget approval for two Patrol Lieutenants for 1989 created an opportunity to complete the Police Department Management Reorganization. I am requesting the position of Administrative/Investigation Captain be abolished. In its place, I would like to reassign some of those duties to the two Patrol Lieutenants and also create a new position of Lieutenant in charge of Investigation. This change would enable the department more management control over the line functions, as well as for the balance of 1989, eliminate the need for an Investigative Sergeant and Captain in charge of Investigation. This change will provide a more efficient management system for our department. It is my intent, as a part of the 1990 budget process, to ask for an additional Supervisor in Investigation and that position would be rank of Sergeant. The current problem we have, in Investigation, is that there is no depth to our supervision. As a result, our current supervisor in Investigation gets called on an average of three to eight times over the course of a weekend to appove issues surrounding the Investigation of serious cases. I am also requesting a title change for our Office Manager, Virginia Knight, to that of Support Service Manager, which is more reflective of the position that she holds. Attached you will find a copy of our organizational chart as it reflects the changes I am requesting. It should be noted that for budget purposes this reorganization will incur less dollars than the original 1989 budget request. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police PJG:lb Attachment THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmativ Action Employer nistrat Sec. (1 Services Manager( ) Lead Dispatche .1spatcher b 4 FT 4 P Recept. Clerk Data 2 PT I Typist(2 Entry Police Chief Captain, Administration Captain, Operations Lieutenants Sergeants Police Chief (1j Captain peration Patrol ILt. (2) Lts. I vestigatiflit n Team ATeam B Crimes Property Juvenile 2 Sgts. 2 Sgts. Against Crimes ild Prot Q. tion ersons I (2) Patrol Patrol Officers Officers (151 (1 J) =S- C.S.Oi Control( ) 1989 Budget 1989 Reorganization Request 1 1 1 0 1 i 2 3 5 4 T - 10 9 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting There are thirteen (13) items on the agenda referred to as the Consent Agenda requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. [0. PAREW4 7; I'1Do no 1W4.4, i. Item 1. Clerk Typist Positions — As the Council is aware, the City recently advertised openings for clerk typists and received over 450 applications. Over 150 of the applicants were invited to the Eagan Municipal Center for written testing. At the last City Council meeting, appointments were approved for the positions open in the Police Department, Fire Department and at the City Maintenance Facility. The remaining positions are still to be filled: a. Full-time Clerk Typist in Administration -- Finalists for this position were selected from the results of written and typing tests. Interviews are being held on Friday, March 3, 1989, by Administrative Secretary Finnegan and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. It is expected that the name of the candidate recommended for hiring will be presented to the City Council with the administrative agenda or at the meeting on Tuesday. b. Half-time Clerk Typist in Community Development -- Interviews for this position will be held on Monday, March 6, 1989, by Community Development Director Runkle, Community Development Secretary Severson and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. It is expected that the name of the candidate recommended for hiring will be presented to the City Council at the meeting on Tuesday. C. Half-time Clerk Typist in Parks Department -- Interviews for this position will be held on Tuesday, March 7, 19898 by Recreation Supervisor II Peterson, Parks Secretary Nesko and Assistant to the City Administrator Duffy. It is expected that the name of the candidate recommended for hiring will be presented to the City Council at the meeting on Tuesday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the hiring of three clerk typists, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PLIIMBERS LICENSES B. Plumbers Licenses --There are eight (8) plumbing firms and one (1) water softening firm that have applied for licenses. All applicants have satisfied the City code regulations and are in order for consideration. Please refer to the attachment enclosed on page R for a list of those firms. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON TRIS ITEM: To approve the eight (8) plumbing licenses and one (1) water softener license as presented. -PLUMBERS' LICENSES MARCH 7., 1989 t. AAA Plumbing by Nevistrom, IN6, 2; -Ashby Plumbing 3. Doody Mechanical, Ificr. 4. LeVahn Brothers 5,. McDonald Plumbing Systems, Inc. 6. Murk Plumbing, Inc. T. Star Plumbing a Excavating 8. Williams Plumbing WATER SOFTENER LICENSE: 1. Minnesota Water Treatment', Inc- Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting GAMBLING LICENSE. MINNESOTA VALLEY EXCHANGE CLUB C. License, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exahange Club, Pull Tabs at Rich rds Food i Liquor, 4185 S. Robert Trail --Enclosed on pages= through � is a copy of a gambling license application to allow for pull tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor sponsored by the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club. The gambling Manager, Mr. Joseph Carlson, and the license application have been reviewed by the Police Department and found to be in order for consideration. The national theme for Exchange Clubs is the prevention of child abuse. The Minnesota Valley Exchange Club which meets at the Blue Cross Building has participated with "in-kind" labor and financial contribution to the Robert B. Lewis House on a regular basis. It is the intention of the club to continue that sponsorship with charitable proceeds that are raised through the sale of pull -tabs. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the gambling license application of the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club for the sale of pull -tabs at Richards Food and Liquor. IC) .a', Charitable G9mbling Control Board Room N-476 Griggs -Midway Building 1821 University Avenue 5612) PaulS Mi0 M to 5a5� LL � GAMBLING LICENSE APPLICATION CHECK# INSTRUCTIONS: A. Type or print in ink. B. TNra completed application to local governing body, obtain signature and dabs on all copies. and leave 1 eoptc Applicant keeps 1 copy and sands original to the above address with a check. C. Incomplete applications may be returned. D. Enclose license fee with application. Typeof Application: ❑Class A — Fee $100.00 (Bingo, Reffios, Paddlewheels, Tipbcards, Pull -tabs) JOCIm B — Fee 8 50.00 (Raffles, Paddiewheels. Tipboards, Pull -tabs) 01do d■ds o.raeta to: ❑Class C — Fee $ 50.00 (Bingo only) ara..uaoeehle m — -Co udeoard ❑Class D — Fee B 25.00 (Raffles only) Check ons: 01 A. Organization has never been licensed. ❑ 1 B. New she — Give base license number. 0 111 C. Renewal of existing license — Give complete license number. Ell D. Change In dens of an existing license —Give complete license number. - 0 ❑ilss BNo 2. Has organization ever received a Lawful Gambling Exemption Permit from the Board? U yes, give complete A permit number 011belphlo 3. Have Internal Controls been submitted previously on a form provided by the Board? H no, please attach copy. NOW 4- Applicant (Official, legal name of organization) 5. Business Address of Organization I: ,mm - 1 1r.. vr• ? 1 Box 21-124 S. Cfry, State, Zip 7. County S. Business Phone Number l+=r. r;- ^.o _ _ (-" I LF a r 8. Type of organization: ❑Fraternal ❑Veterans ❑Religious iDOthernonprofit* 00 organization Is an "other nonprofit" organization, answer questions 10 through 12. If not, go to question 13. "Other nonprofit" organizations mist document its tax-exempt status. 1111n12No 10. Is organization Incorporated ae a nonprofit organization? d yes, give number assigned to Articles or page and book number: II Attach copy of certificate. a,212 1 i ,,r3 f nr - ElYmONo 11. Are articles filed with the Secretary of State? ©11bs❑No 12. Is organization exempt from Minnesota or Federal income tax? If yes, please attach letterfrom IRS or Department of Revenue declaring exemption. ❑1iseS3No 13. Has license ever been denied, suspended or revoked? H yea check ell that a ly: ❑Denied ❑Suspended ❑Revoked Give date: 14. Number of active members 15. Number of years in existence Note: Attech ovidmrcs of three years outs" nce. 7 Yrs. cony of, Cnartrr attact 16. Name of Chief Executive Officer (Cannot be 17. Name of treasurerorparm onwho accounts for other revenues Gambling Manager) of the organization (Cannot be Gambling Manager) Title v Tide Treasurer Business Phone Number Business Phone Number a' 4i L I 5 — 1(;12 ) 454-11100 18. Name of establishment where gambling will be 18. Street address (not P.O. Box Number) conducted pi-h,1(3m i n' 20- City, State, Zip 21. County (where gambling premises is located) Dakotp CG -0001-03(8/88) White Copy -Board Page 1 of 2 Canary -Applicant Pink -Local Governing Body ,t1 { Gambling License Appillication Type of Application: OCless A $Clens B Ogase C OClese D within 23. Are all gambling activities conducted at the premises listed in 018 of this applications' H not, complete a separate application for each premises (except raffles) as a separate license is required for each premises. OYes f3No 24. Does organization own the gambling premises? if no, attach copy of the Isese with terms of at bast one year, and attach a sketch of the premises indicating what portion is being leased. A lease and sketch are not required for Class D applications. 25. Amount of Rent Per 28. Do you plan on conducting bingo with this license? If yes, give days and times of bingo occasions. NO Month or ties o Occasion Day Time Day Time Day Tana °590.00 11 ONp ONo 27. Has the $10,000 fidelity bond required by Minnesota Statutes 349.20 been obtained? Anel le d For 28. hwutlMo.STaF rQpny Qa%InL#srrr�nyme) U2 Y (: ID If site is located within a township, item 47 must be completed, in 29. Bond Number 30. Lessor Name zchards Foot' and Liquo, vaddition 31, adr�s� 41A5 S. Robert 'Rail 2. City, Stete,Lp 551� 3 am State' 33. GamblingManager Name Joseph Carlson 4ZAII //l � 34 dress lkl5 W. 55 th St. 35 Cih State,16x1Lp 55419 p 38. Gambling Manager Business Phone 37. Dam gambling manager became ( 61' ) BY 1 e"./'' member of organization: I Month Naar ONas Odto 38. Has the license termination form been completed? Attach copy. lbs ONo 39. Has the compensation schedule been approved by the organization? Attach copy. 41. Bank Name 42. Bank Address 43. Bank Account Number GAMBLING SITE AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, local law enforcement officers or agents of the Board are hereby authorized to enter upon the site at any time gambling is being conducted to observe the gambling and to enforce the low for any unauthorized game or practice. BANK RECORDS AUTHORIZATION By my signature below, the Board is hereby authorized to inspect the bank records of the gambling bank account whenever necessary to full requirements of current gambling rules and law. I hereby declare that: WITH 1. 1 have read this application and all information submitted to the Board; 2. All information submitted is true, accurate and complete; 3. All other required information has been fully disclosed; 4. 1 am the chief executive officer of the organization; 5. 1 assume full responsibility for the fair and lawful operation of all activities to be conducted; 8. 1 will familiarize myself with the laws of the State of Minnesota respecting gambling and rules of the Board and agree, if licensed, to abide by those laws and rules, including amendments thereto; a al Na o O egizption I45. Signature (must be signed by Chief Executive Officer) "•e Mceiar Biu �: r•.inneso•,.a Valley 1c ... Tine of signer Presiders'Date Feb. 22,1989 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE BY LOCAL GOVERNING BODY I hereby acknowledge receipt of a copy of this application. Byadmowledging receipt, I admit having bein served with notice that this application will be reviewed by the Charitable Gambling Control Board and H approved by the board, will become effective 60 days from the date of receipt (noted below) unless a resolution of the local governing body is passed which specifically disallows such activity and a copy of that resolution is received by the Charitable Gambling Control Board within 60 days of the below noted date. 45. Name of City or County (Local Governing Body) If site is located within a township, item 47 must be completed, in to the county signature. H township Is not organized, vaddition county must sign. Signature of person receiving appliiAtion 47. Name of TowneNp 4ZAII //l � X y : Title f ''e"' 71P C' Date received (80 day period Signature of person receiving application e"./'' begins from this date) 48, -Nam of parsers delivering appdcation to Locd Govarnirg Body Title CG-0me1-03 I8f881 while copy -Board Pagel 4 of 2 11 Conry -Applicant Pkika.oeal GovarNeig Body Agenda Information March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting D. License, Liquor, NervManager/LaFonda DeAcebo--As a consequence of a change in management, LaFonda DeAcebo Restaurant at 3665 SibleMemorial Hi hwa has re Y g y quested that its liquor license be amended to reflect a new manager of the restaurant. Enclosed without page number for your review is a copy of the Police Department report in this regard. The report indicates no findings which would prohibit approval of this change. ACTION TO HB CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an amendment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Restaurant to reflect a new manager: as (3 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting E. Project 527, Final Assessment Hearing (Lexington Square Storm Sewer) Continue Indefinitely --On February 21, the Council received the proposed final assessment roll for the above - referenced project and scheduled the formal public final assessment hearing for March 21. Further review by staff of the various issues involved with this particular project indicate that we would not be able to respond adequately to the anticipated questions at the final assessment hearing. Therefore, it is recommended that this hearing be continued indefinitely to allow staff the necessary time to provide further research as necessary. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue indefinitely the scheduled final assessment hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer). F. Project 487R, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Braun Court - Streets 8 Storm Sewer) --The staff has received the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and is recommending that the City Council consider scheduling the formal public final assessment hearing to present the final cost to the affected property owners. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 487R (Braun Court - Streets & Storm Sewer) and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. G. Project 518, Receive Final Assessment Roll/Order Public Hearing (Eagan High School - Utilities) --The staff has prepared the final assessment roll for the above -referenced project and is recommending that the City Council consider scheduling the formal final assessment hearing so that the information can be presented to the affected property owners prior to certification of the County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the final assessment roll for Project 518 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and order the public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. 14 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting MAINTENANCE VEHICLE #125/APPROVE SPECS/AD FOR BIDS H. Maintenance Vehicle #125, Approve Specs/Authorize Ad For Bids (Miscellaneous Equipment & Attachments) --Recently, the Council authorized the purchase of a tandem dump truck, cab and chassis only, as a part of the approved 1989 budget. Now that the specific make, model and dimensions of the cab and chassis have been determined through this selection process, detailed specifications have been prepared to outfit this vehicle with the appropriate dump boa, snow plow/wing and sanding equipment. Therefore, staff is requesting authorization to solicit formal bids for this miscellaneous equipment and attachments. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Maintenance Vehicle #125 (Miscellaneous and authorize the advertisement for a 10:30 a.m. on March 14, 1989. /s To approve the specs for Equipment & Attachments) bid opening to be held at Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting CONTRACT 88-06/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE BRAUN COURT - STREET & STORM SEWER I. Contract 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Street & Storm Sewer) --The staff has received a request for final payment for the above -reference Contract from our consulting engineer along with a certification of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and it is recommended that the final payment be issued and the project be formally accepted for perpetual City maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 3rd and final payment for Contract 88-06 (Braun Court - Street & Storm Sewer) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 88-12/FINAL PAYMENT/ACCEPTANCE EAGAN-HIGH SCHOOL - UTILITIES J. Contract 88-12, Final Payment/Acceptance (Eagan High School - Utilities) --The staff has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with the certification from our consulting engineer of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and is now being recommended for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:To approve the 5th and final payment for Contract 88-12 (Eagan High School -Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. CONTRACT 87 K. Contract 87-32C, Final Payment/Acceptance (Chapel Hill Addition -Streets & Utilities --The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a certification from our consulting engineer of compliance with City approved plans and specifications. All final verification inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and it is now being recommended for formal acceptance and perpetual maintenance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the 2nd and final payment for Contract 87-32C (Chapel Hill Addition - Streets & Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. SW wf441L ulLPF4.PESFi µ11J LAP ADDlflofl RrsER. t - LOT Io * Lot 9 LOTb --TS-- � I I---89�--- -- �-----loo'----- ---69� IF. 4. 6f 1,1W 1 PROP05ED ISE LL 's � o t3In Fy lol I n n Q Q :" ■ U l ❑ p E3 li r-1 El � r °� ._. '' 1 LEcTNG 51Ad•yrnTloI dLz W V_.. IZ ■ "- I n 13 17 PIFE.v�ie :.::• . 1 1 \ 1/4 coF ■ co►�w4 j =J 1 A ti n G SE 2T LIME Of 00%+6U.'T27011Fw somfo .-- _ 0 k WILPff gft (Cu hoAp - as"* EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIG. 1 M AssocloW DEEP WELL- D Comm. 4W3 Alch°°• 'W..�,. SITE PLAN so^Le- I'=5o nft 2I,19� Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PETITION TO VACATE PORTION OF PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY (AUGE ROAD) L. Petition to Vacate Portion of Public Right-of-way (Auge Road) --Staff has received a petition to vacate a portion of the cul-de-sac on the south end of Auge Road to take into consideration the final plat of the proposed Prettyman Heights Addition. The final plat application has been received and the final plat approval is anticipated to be processed at the same time as the public hearing for this requested vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting COOPERATIVE POWER ASSOCIATION LEASE AGREEMENT/FIRE M. Approve Cooperative Power Association Lease Agreement/Fire Station #3/Well & Pumphouse--As a part of the approved 1988 Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, one of the future wells for the City of Eagan is proposed to be located on the north end of the existing Fire Station #3 site currently being leased from Cooperative Power Association (CPA). Enclosed on page —LO�-- is a location map. The previous Lease Agreement for the Fire Station was exclusive to that particular use and the proposed use for the development of a well with related pumphouse facilities requires the execution of a new revised Lease. This Lease Agreement has been prepared in accordance with the existing Fire Station Lease Agreement and reviewed by the City Attorney's office with concurrence from the Public Works Director and CPA staff. There would be no fee to the City for the ability to use this property for the development of our well facility. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To Power Association Lease Agreement for South Station #3) and authorize the Mayor and City related documents. 19 approve Cooperative Well Field "D" (Fire Clerk to execute all NILo*PF.59 FI 0 QIID pkDorrivJ } - Lot 10 LOT 9 LOT b NzV 4�10 1 2i446;01 ❑ I 101 n . d ..^ i 13 M 13 13 ` I 13 D Q 1. ❑ n a q I 3TOFri6EIJEF 1 �, �• : , rI ,I I E(.EL1NG 51Ap•S7ATI0�1 Nj 13 1] N LOI�G.S i I p 11 13 17 r 1 bolffI LIFE OF Oa %} W.T2' „f �� I _�----------19502'-----�-' k WILDEFI�EK FN hof.p 0 Em �F "'°° EAGAN, MINNESOTA SIG. 1 Assochno DEEP WELL- D �, 49413 ..,. SITE PLAN inSo o�T.Zl,l9� Report For G'EDARVALE BOULEVARD E;agan., Minnesota City Project No.546 FEB,RUA_RY 79 1989 Comm. No. 4212 Orr Schelen Mayeron & Engineers ® Surveyors ® Planners 07 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PROJECT 546/CEDARVALE BOULEVARD (STREET RESURFACING) A. Project 546, Cedarvale Boulevard (Street Resurfacing) --On February 7, 1989, the Council received a feasibility report for the restoration and resurfacing of Cedarvale Boulevard (Old Trunk Highway 13) and scheduled a public hearingto ye held on March 7, 1989. Enclosed on pages �! through Iris a copy of the feasibility report discussing the aspects of this project. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. The consulting engineer will present the specifics associated with this project and, along with the Public Works Director, will be available to address any questions as a result of this public hearing presentation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 546 (Cedarvale Boulevard- Restoration/Resurfacing) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTIMATE OF COST CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 546 EAGAN, MINNESOTA PREPARED BY ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON A ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS/SURVEYORS/PLANNERS 2021 EAST HENNEPIN AVENUE MINNEAPOLIS', MINNESOTA OSM COMM. NO. 4212 �?a February 7, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Cedarvale Boulevard Project No. 546 OSM Commission No. 4212 Dear Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith is our report for Cedarvale Boulevard Project No. 546. This report addresses the necessary street improvements and utility considerations for the rehabilitation of Cedarvale Boulevard. We would be happy to discuss this report with all interested parties at your convenience. Please give us a call if you have any questions. Sincerely, ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC. C.6 Henry C. Osmundson, P.E. Project Engineer HCO:mlj Attachment I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. C. Osmundson, P.E. Dated: February 7 1989 Reg. No. 19156 Approved by: L n�� Depar ment i Works - - - - - Date: 7� / C TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE' TRANSMITTAL LETTER/CERTIFICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS I.. SCOPE I1, FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION III. DISCUSSION A. Storm Sewer B. Street C. Signalization Improvements/Modifications D. Easements and Permits IV. PROJECT AREA/ASSESSABLE.AREAS V. COST ESTIMATE PAGE NO. 1 I 1 1 2 4 4 4 5 VI. ASSESSMENTS: 6 X. PROJECT SCHEDULE 6 APPENDIX A - COST ESTIMATES APPENDIX B - PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL APPENDIX C - BRAUN PAVEMENT EVALUATION DRAWINGS NO: 1-6 a� FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ESTIMATE OF COST CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 546 EAGAN, MINNESOTA RP id11�1 This project includes construction of a bituminous overlay and storm sewer repair on Cedarvale Boulevard and Nicols Road, and the addition of a turn lane on Silver Bell Road leading to the State Highway 13 intersection. Cedarvale Boulevard is located in the southeast quadrant at the intersection of Minnesota State Highways 13 and 77 (Cedar Avenue). The project encompasses 3,800 L.F. of Cedarvale Boulevard from Nicols Road at Beau De Rue Drive to Silver Bell Road and 300 L.F. of Silver Bell Road. The project is a State Aid project and is eligible for State turnback funding. A location map of Cedarvale Boulevard is located on Sheet No. 1 in the back of the report. II.. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION Three altern at"ives were examined for this, report for the rehabilitation of Cedarvale Boulevard. One alternative is a complete rebuilding of the street into an urban section complete with a storm sewer system and _appurtenances. A second alternative is comprised of an overlay, minor storm sewer modifications, and the use of a pavement reinforcement fabric throughout. A third alternative is simply an overlay and ,repair of an existing storm sewer pipe. All three alternatives are feasible from an engineering standpoint. However, with cost considerations and State funding allocations in mind, we recommend the second alternative. III. DISCUSSION A. STORM SEWER Currently, the on-site drainage system consists of culverts and open ditches conveying runoff from the area to the ditch on the south side of Highway 13 and eventually to the Minnesota River. At the west end of the project, runoff flows from the Nicols Road area to the north through a bituminous ditch and an arched 36" corrugated metal pipe (CMP) on the east side of Nicols Road. It then flows easterly through a shallow, grassy ditch eventually crossing to the north ditch of Cedarvale Boulevard through an existing 24" reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). as The grassy ditch is filled with sand and gravel deposited from upstream erosion and will be cleaned and regraded to ensure proper drainage and flow. The bituminous ditch will be removed, the ditch filled in and sloped to the R.O.W. line, and concrete curb and gutter will be constructed on the east side of Nicols Road. The curb and gutter will terminate at the intersection of Nicols Road and Cedarvale Boulevard approximately 300' north of Cedarvale Drive with a bituminous spillway into the regraded ditch. The southerly ditch in front of Mister Donut at the east end of Cedarvale Boulevard will also be cleaned up as necessary. As part of the State turnback funding, MnDOT has agreed to pay for replacing the twin 36" RCP crossings near the Rahn Road intersection. This will also be incorporated into the project. During site inspection, it was discovered that there is underground erosion taking place at the existing storm sewer system on the north side of the intersection of Nicols Road and Cedarvale Boulevard. The bituminous shoulder is subsiding, as well as a portion of the ditch adjacent to an existing manhole. This pipe will also be repaired under this project. The twin 48" culverts crossing Silver Bell at the Highway 13 ditch will be extended as necessary for the additional lane, as will the 42" arched RCP south of the Cedarvale Boulevard intersection. In addition, two catch basins on Silver Bell Road will be removed and replaced. B. STREET 1. Existing Conditions: Cedarvale Boulevard is an existing rural section frontage road extending 3,800 L.F. Road ditches offer drainage relief for the majority of the street. The portion of roadway from Silver Bell westerly 3,100 feet to the intersection with Nicols Road is part of the old Trunk Highway 13 roadbed. The 700' from this intersection to newly rebuilt Nicols Road at Beau De Rue Drive is a newer roadbed built in the 1970's, along with the Cedar Avenue construction. The bituminous surface was last overlayed in 1977 and varies in width from 40' to 601. The surface condition varies widely, with longitudinal, block and transverse cracking throughout. There are a few areas within the bituminous surface where a good crowned section does not exist, resulting in poor surface drainage and the subsequent creation of potholes. The soil boring results show a bituminous thickness of 4.5" to 6.25" and an aggregate base thickness of 0 to 4 inches. The subgrade consists of silty sand with clay and gravel. (See attached Braun Engineering Report -Appendix Q. The current (1988) Average Daily Traffic for Cedarvale Boulevard is 17050 vehicles per day. -2- a( 2. Recommendations: The recommended street improvements were designed using site investigation data, the attached Braun Engineering Soil Borings and Pavement Strength Evaluation Report (Appendix C), consultations with bituminous paving contractors and suppliers, and consultations with MnDOT personnel. The street improvements include the establishment of a center line with an aligned crown, and improving the drainage, turning lanes and rideability of Cedarvale Boulevard and are shown in detail on Sheet Nos. 2A - Fin the back of the report. The center line of the street will be established approximately 35' south of the center line of the 225' R.O.M. for the east -west portion of the roadway and follow the existing curve around to align with the center line of Nicols Road. The crown will be established using leveling courses and/or pavement grinding. The driving lanes will consist of two 12' through lanes on either side of a 14' left turn or dual left turn lane, flanked with 8' bituminous shoulders on Cedarvale Boulevard. At the Nicols Road intersection, the road width will transition into a 44' width to match Nicols Road to the south. Sawcutting of the existing pavement and widening of the roadway will be required to achieve this consistent roadway and lane width. Thermoplastic paving markers will be utilized to delineate the lanes. Detail Sheet No. 3 in the back of the report shows a typical lane schematic. The establishment of the proper crown and alignment will require special surveying and street section engineering. The bituminous surface will be rehabilitated by grinding out and patching the infrequent potholes and the large (greater than 1/2") transverse and longitudinal cracks. The smaller cracks and block cracking are numerous and require a uniform treatment or full bituminous removal. As a result, a paving fabric with an accompanying heavy tack coat will be placed prior to the bituminous overlay. This will prevent moisture from penetrating the bituminous and destroying the base. Also, the fabric will retard the development of reflection cracks. The bituminous overlay will consist of a 1-1/2" mat of No. 2341 modified mix over the entire project. An additional one inch bituminous course will be installed for approximately 700' north of the intersection of Nichols Road and Beau de Rue Drive. This is necessary to attain the strength requirements for a 9 -ton roadway. The shoulders will be over- layed to 1-1/2" maximum thickness tapering to 1" at the outer edge using a 2341 shouldering mix. Fine grading will be required to blend the newly — --3----- - -- constructed shoulder to the existing shoulder. Detail Sheet No. 4 in the back of the report shows the typical street sections. The Silver Bell Road intersection improvements include the addition of one 14' northbound lane beginning at the Beau de Rue Drive - Silver Bell Road intersection and terminating at State Highway 13. This would result in 3 northbound lanes: a left turn/through lane, a through lane and a right turn only lane. This will be accomplished by extending the roadway 14' to the east, with appropriate medians and striping. B-618 concrete curb and gutter will be installed on the east side for the 300 L.F., along with a 1-1/2" 2341 modified bituminous overlay over the entire road width. (See Detail Sheet No. 2F). C. SIGNALIZATION INPROVENENTS/NODIFICATIONS In order to accommodate the additional roadway width on Silver Bell Road east of T.H. 13, the traffic signal mast arm pole in the southeast quadrant will be relocated and repainted. It is recommended that traffic operations be monitored and counts be taken at Silver Bell and Beau de Rue to determine if a traffic signal is warranted at this intersection in the future. D. RIGHT OF WAY AND PERMITS A temporary construction/slope easement will be required for the ditch repair on Nicols Road. All other construction will take place within the existing 225' R.O.W. on Cedarvale Boulevard; the 66' R.O.W. on Nicols Road; and the 66' R.O.W. on Silverbell Road, thereby requiring no additional right of way. There are no permits required, but the plans will be reviewed by the Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District. As a MnDOT State Aid project, the plans must meet DOT standards and will advance through the MSA process to obtain the approvals necessary for cost participation. IV. PROJECT AREA/ASSESSABLE AREAS The properties to be assessed for the project are shown on the attached Assessable Properties Drawing (Sheet No. 5) in the back of the report. Generally, the construction will affect the Northeast Quarter of Section '19, which is the Cedarvale Shopping Center area north of Beau de Rue Drive. The areas that benefit and are proposed to be assessed for these improvements are as .follows• All parcels are in the N.E. 1/4 of Section 19, Township 27, Range 23 100-08 010-08 020-08 030-08 040-08 020=07 051-06 011-06 010-06 050-04 020-04 010-04 Cedarval'e'Second Addition: Outlot A and Lot 2 Outlot B and Lot 3 Outlot C and Lot 4 V. COST ESTIMATES A detailed cost estimate can be found in the attached Appendix A. A summary of these costs is as follows: A. Cedarvale Boulevard Storm Drain $ 19,600 B. Cedarvale Boulevard Streets 257,500 C. Silver Bell Road Improvments 69.900 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $347.000' The above referenced total estimated project cost includes a contingency factor and all related overhead. Overhead costs are estimated •at 30% and include legal, engineering, administrative and fiscal. M0 VI. ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the parcels shown in Appendix B. The benefitted properties will be assessed according to the assessment cost estimate for a normal street overlay detailed in Appendix A, Section D. The recommended project includes the realignment of the centerline of Cedarvale Boulevard and an improvement of the geometrics of the Silver Bell Road and State Highway 13 intersection. Also, there are ordinarily two benefitted sides to a street improvement project, which is not the case here. Most of the property on the north side of the boulevard is State Highway right of way and the private property on the north side was previously assessed for Cedarview Drive improvements which provides them individual direct street access. Using this information, an acceptable overlay assessment per front foot was calculated by dividing the normal overlay project cost by the total front footage. For this project, this estimated overlay assessment per front foot equals $15.06. The estimated assessable front footage equals approximately 3590 L.F. In addition, the curb and gutter along Nicols Road north of Beau de Rue Drive will be assessed to the benefitted proper- ties. The assessments will be spread over 10 years at the interest rate determined by the bond sale used to finance the project. Project Cost Assessments 1. Cedarvale Boulevard Storm Sewer $ 19,600 2. Cedarvale Boulevard/Nicols Road 257,500 Streets 3. Silver Bell Road Improvements 69.900 TOTALS ........................ $347,000 VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications MnDOT Review (30 Days) Open Bids Award Contract Construction Completion Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes -6- 02/07/89 03/07/89 03/21/89 04/28/89 05/02/89 07/89 09/89 05/90 W $57,585 $57,585 Trunk Funds/ Other Sources $ 19,600 199,915 69.900 $289,415 APPENDfiX A Page PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE CEDARVALE BOULEVARD PROJECT NO. 546 A. CEDARVALE BLVD. STORM SEWER B. CEDARVALE BLVD. - STREETS TOTAL UNIT UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL 36' R.C.P. 180 L.F. @ S 60.00 = S 10800.00 48' R.C.P. 24 L.F. @ S 70.00 = S 1680.00 REMOVE & REPLACE 48' RCP 24 L.F. @ $ 50.00 = $ 1200.00 TOTAL @ f 1.00 = S $ 13680.00 +10% CONTINGENCY L.F. @ S 1.00 = f 1368.00 TOTAL STORM TRAIN CONSTRUCTION COST 700 C.Y. @ S t 15048.00 +30% ADMINISTRATION C017AN BORROW 2000 C.Y. @ $ 4352.00 TOTAL STORM DRAIN PROJECT COST 10000.00 CLEAN / FINE GRADE DITCH 1000 f 19600.OD B. CEDARVALE BLVD. - STREETS TOTAL UNIT ITEM QUANTITIES UNITS PRICE TOTAL SAWCUT BITUMINOS 5500 L.F. @ f 1.00 = S %00.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS DITCH 600 S.Y. @ S 1.00 = S 600.00 REMOVE BITUMINOS ROADWAY 3500 S.Y. @ f 1.00 = S 3500.00 REMOVE PIPE (ALL SIZES) 200 L.F. @ S 1.00 = f 200.00 CO@MDI EXCAVATION (DITCH) 700 C.Y. @ S 3.00 = S 2100.00 C017AN BORROW 2000 C.Y. @ $ 5.00 = $ 10000.00 CLEAN / FINE GRADE DITCH 1000 L.F. @ f 2.00 = S 2000.00 AGGREGATE SHOULDER CL 2 (100% CR.) 850 TON @ $ 8.00 = $ 6800.00 2341 BITUMINOUS WEAR COARSE (MOD.) 2200 TON @ f 11.00 = f 2420D.00 2341 BITUMINOUS SHOULDERING COURSE 900 TON @ $ 12.00 = $ 10800.00 2331 BITUMINOS LEVEL COARSE (MOD.) 1000 TON @ $ 12.00 = S 12000.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE 260 TON @ S 160.00 = S 41600.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 7650 GAL. @ $ 1.00 = S 7650.00 Y DEEP CRACK GRINDING 3200 S.Y. @ $ 2.00 = $ 6400.00 BITUMINOS PATCHING 3200 S.Y. @ S 3.50 = $ 11200.00 PAVING FABRIC 23100 S.Y. @ f 1.00 = S 23100.00 CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER B 618 700 L.F. @ $ 5.00 = S 3500.00 SOIUIIGi 2000 S.Y. @ 6 2.00 = 6 4000.00 F 6 I TR SIGNS (COMPLETE ASSEMBLY) 2 FA. @ S 200.00 = f 400.00 NEM & REP TR SIDS 4 EA. @ $ 150.00 = $ 600.00 PER@V@€NT LANE MARK - WHITE SOLID 9150 L.F. @ S 1.50 = S 13725.00 PERMANENT LAGS KW - YELLOW SOLID 4800 L.F. @ $ 1.50 = f 7200.00 PERMANENT LANE MARK - YELLOW STRIPED 1400 L.F. @ S 1.50 = f 2100.00 PERMANENT LAWS MARK - ARROWS 26 EA. @ S 125.00 = $ 3250.00 TOTAL S 180075.00 +10% LDNTINGENCY 18007.50 TOTAL STREET CONSTRUCTION COST f 198082.50 +30% ADMINISTRATION 59417.50 TOTAL STREET PROJECT COST 3� S 257500.00 C. SILVER BELL ROAD LANE ADDITION TOTAL PROJECT COST A. CEOARVALE BLVD. STORM SETA:R TOTAL 19600.00 B. CEDARVALE BLVD. STREETS WIT 257500.00 C. SILVER CELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ITEM RJANTITIES (NITS S PRICE TOTAL ORMAAAR BORROW 1500 C. Y. @ f 5.00 = f 7500.00 COMMON EXCAVATION 200 C.Y. @ f 3.00 = S 600.00 CLASS 5 (100% CRUSHED) 170 TON @ f 7.00 = f 1190.00 2331 BASE COtJRSE 125 TON @ $ 10.00 = S 1250.00 2341 MOD BIT NEAR COURSE 210 TON @ f 11.00 = f 2310.00 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR MIXTLRE 20 TON @ f 160.00 = f 3200.00 BMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK CDAT 110 GAL @ f 1.00 = f 110.00 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER B 618 300 L.F. e f 20.00 = f 6000.00 REMOVE CLRB &GUTTER 100 L.F. @ f 1.00 = f 100.00 STRIPING 1200 L.F. @ f 0.07 = f 84.00 12' R.C.P. C.B. LEADS 30 L.F. @ f 20.00 = f 600.00 15" R.C.P. C. B. LEADS 30 L.F. e f 25.00 = f 750.00 48' R.C.P. .48 L.F. @ f 70.00 = f 3360.00 42" ARCH R.C.P. 16 L.F. @ f 70.00 = f 1120.00 REMOVE & FlEFUCE 42' OR 48' RCP FES 3 EA. @ f 100.00 = f 300.00 REMOVE RCP 60 L.F. @ f 100.00 = f 6000.00 REMDVE STRUCTURE 2 EA. @ f 500.00 = f 1000.00 CATCH BASIN TYPE A 1 EA. @ f 700.00 = $ 700.00 CATCH BASIN TYPE B I EA. @ S 700.00 = f 700.00 RELOCATE POLE, F & I MAST ARM I L.S. @ f = f 10000.00 PAINT/REFINISH MAST ARM/POLE I L.S. @ f = S 2000.00 TOTAL f 48874.00 +IDX CONTINGENCY 488/,40 TOTAL CONSTRLCTION COST f 53761.40 +30% ADMINISTRATION 16138.60 TOTAL PRO ECT COST f 69900.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST A. CEOARVALE BLVD. STORM SETA:R f 19600.00 B. CEDARVALE BLVD. STREETS f 257500.00 C. SILVER CELL ROAD IMPROVEMENTS f 69900.00 TOTAL PROJECT S 347000.00 ml 33 Mase D. ASSEESMENT COST'ESTIMATE FOR A NORMAL OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE,FON STREET OVERUAY ITEM 2341 BIT. HEAR COURSE (MOD:- 201 BITUMINOS MATERIAL FOR MIXTURE BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 2' DEEP CRACK GRINDING BITUMINOUS PATCHING STRIKING TOTAL +IOZ CONTINGENCY TOTAL STREET CONSTRICTION COST +V% ADMINISTRATION TOTAL.STREET PROJECT COST STREET LENGTH = FRONT FOOTAGE = ASSESSMENT PER FRONT FOOT = TOTAL QUANTITIES KNITS TOTAL 2800 TUN e S 485 TUN e S 1270 OAL. e S 3200 S.Y. B $ 3260 S.Y. e f 23100 L.F. e $ 3850 L. F. 7700'L.F. $15.06 UNIT PRICE TOTAL 11.00 = s 30800:00 160.00 = S 29600.00 1.00 c S 1270.00 2.00 = '6 6400.00 3.50 = f 11200.00 0.07 = $ 1617.00 S 80887.00 8088.70 f 88973.70 27024.30 S 116000.00 (TOTAL PROJECT COST DIVIDED, BY FRONT FOOTAGE) rdse APPENDIX B 25 Page PRELVIINARY ASSES. t ROLL & smm ASSESSMENT ESTIMATE GEIHARVALE ifYJL_miARD CITY PROJECT NO. 546 PFRCEL (ALL PARCEL M.FBERS ARE IN 'NE 1/4 S19, T27, ;M.) 100-03 010-08 020.08 030-08 040-03 020-07 051-06 011-06 &'010-06 IF S 4—E L5.NERSHIP CEDARVAL E SECO�Z ADDITION: COTLOT A & LOT 2 IF SAMEONNERS-HIP VJTLOT P & LOT 3 IF SArt G:d)�.!P OLRLOT C & LOT 4 IF SAME CWNEK IP 050-04 020-04 010-04 TOTAL S ESTIMATED OVERLAY CDRB & OUTTER ASSESSABLE ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT LENGTH (ASSESSABLE' LENGTH (ASSESSABLE LENGTH TOTAL (FR. FOOTA(E)(1) x $15.06) (2) X S5.3B) (2) ASSESSMENT 120 L.F. $1,807.20 + 5645.60 = $2,452:80 532 L.F. $8.011.92 + $2,862.16 = S10,874.08 100 L.F. $1,506.00 + NA = $1.506.00 100 L.F. $1,506.00 + NA = $1,506.00 158.8 L.F. $2,391.53 + NA = $2,391.53 150 L.F. S2,259.00 + NA = $2:259.00 1068.10 L.F. $I5,0S.59 + NA = 5161085.59 310 L.F. $4,668,60 + NA $4,668,60 207.11 L.F. 53,119.08 + NA = $3,119.08 200 L.F. $3,01200 + NA = $3,012.00 149.79 L.F. $2, 255. S4 + NA = $2,255.84 150 L.F. 52,259.00 + NA $2,259,00 200 L.F. 53,OIZ.04 + NA = $3,012.00 145 L.F. $2,183.70 + NA = $2,183.70 3590.8 L.F. 554,077.45 + $3,507.76 = $57,585.21 (1) EvTMATED LD.WHS. )M T:-WO!JGR INVESTIGATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTIONNS FOR EXACT LENGTHS. (2) —THIS IS T,$ EESTIMATED ASSeow., COST PER FRONT FOOT. T)$ RATE L:SED NiLL BE C011PL D FROM THE PROJECT COSTS *B CONSTRIx'TED. MA = NO. 4?p:-lL+, KE. p?.B & GUTTER IS NOT PLANNED FrR rE STREET F,ROITING THESE PrRERT:IES. 3 (4::0 APPENDIX C 3-7 1 I PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATSON FOR CITY OF EAGAN. August, 1988 Commission No. 88-433 co An expansion of MIDWEST PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. 1404 Concordia Avenue. St. Paul. MN 55104 — 612 / 644-29% September 2, 1988 OSM Bud Osmundson 2021 East Hennepin Minneapolis, MN 55413 BRAUR'" PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES esu... Dear Mr. Osmundson; 1 Enclosed please find a copy of our report entitled PAVEMENT STRENGTH EVALUATION FOR L CITY OF EAGAN Ouaiity Services Since 1957 GG 91. PE &.c ' EuWWL SYW..n PnD D..caa PE 1W.e. W Ehg P E 6re[tn a Ergme.rng Moen L Dm.rge. PE Denarr a4� We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you and to OSM. Should there be any questions regarding the contents of the report or any of our other services, please do not hesitate to call. i I I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. David W. Janisch, P.E. Registration Number: 18562 Date: 9�aj88 Pavement Manageme Ing . Research AND semmo mm awces 1 Nmtreagulis Hmvng SI CIOYO a &oLMswi 11N ! & nal LLnnt are Wilbsmn ND ! &IlingS aW BDleman. NIT t Cn¢ago It INTRODUCTION The consulting firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron and Asssociates, Inc. contacted Braun Pavement Technologies to conduct deflection testing on Cedarvale Boulevard in the City of Eagan. The testing was done on August 16, 1988. Cedarvale Boulevard was tested using a Model 2000 Road Rater between Silver Bell Road and Beau - d -rue Drive. The pavement was tested at 100 foot intervals in each direction. The test points were staggered so as to provide a 50 foot test interval for the entire length of the pavement. In addition to the deflection testing, three cores were taken to establish the pavement thickness and subgrade type for this roadway. The results of the boring are listed in Table 1. It was thought that there was an old concrete pavement under the asphalt surface. The borings did not find any evidence of this. The asphalt thickness used in the deflection analysis is 4.5 inches. The subgrade soil was plastic. The purpose of this report is to make recommendations as to the in-place pavement strength, the effective subgrade R -value, and the recommended overlay thickness, if any, for the section. 40 T A4 L E 1. @'0:R I ,N 0 RESULTS F'0 R C.E D:A R V A'L E e60 WL E'V,AA D SAMPLE NO. 1. 2 3 sItumI nous T I c me.s.s (1n.) 4.S0 6.23 4. 5'0' C o,mcreta I 1ck:nwo,s (In..) 0.010' 0.00 0.0;0 A,Ogreg,ate ba.s+,e Thickness (In.) 4:.00 0.00 3.00 A.00base r/,d''steri'orsted bituminous S,u)b.0 ra d,e Try p:0 S i t t y s a,n d e l(I t y S t t t y s+a'md it 1_ t h Owe Vs I t o C l e y'+e y s,e n;d 'f 1 me, 1: 1 /2 f t a. plo,s^s 1 b t e AO O. g r I n a d ba s,e fIme 0,ra Imod EQUIPMENT USED A Model 2000 Road Rater (Figure 1) was used for the nondestructive testing (NDT). The Road Rater is an electro - hydraulically activated device that super -imposes a dynamic sinusoidal load onto a static load. The amplitude and frequency of the load are adjusted by the operator of the Road Rater for each test point. The static load is mechanically adjusted and is normally set on a daily basis. For this project, the static load was set at approximately 3500 pounds. The dynamic load was held between 3500 and 4000 pounds. This resulted in a continued series of pulses applied to the pavement over a constant static as shown in Figure 2. An 18 -inch diameter steel contact plate was used to apply the load to the pavement. The deflections were measured at the center of the load area and at 12, 24, and 36 inches behind the center of the load plate. A diagram of the deflection basin and deflection measurement locations is shown in Figure 3. Figure 1. Model 2000 Road Rater O a O INCREASING TIME Figure 2. Diagram of Road Rater Loading DYNAMIC LOAD (Peat to Poon) 2 x x 0 Z^ W O O FO W Wp W Y�j U. 4m luz O 1 p 1 O 1 Ov 1 --------------------------_....,.,,.,..,�.��.��.,.,,,.._....-- DEFLECTION BASIN SHAPE IS A FUNCTION OF 1) THICKNESS OF THE LAYERS 2) ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE LAYERS � COMPRESSION « TENSION Figure 3. Deflection Basin as measured by the Model 2000 Road Rater �3 DEFLECTION BASIN SHAPE IS A FUNCTION OF 1) THICKNESS OF THE LAYERS 2) ELASTIC MODULUS OF THE LAYERS � COMPRESSION « TENSION Figure 3. Deflection Basin as measured by the Model 2000 Road Rater �3 BASIS OF ANALYSIS The analysis was based on the results of the deflection tests and also on information furnished by the client as follows: -the average annual daily traffic -the thickness of asphalt surfacing -the type of soil in the subgrade i In addition to the determination of the allowable spring axle load limits for each section as listed in Table 2, design analysis were included as requested which includes the following: -the effective aubgrade soil R -Value -the recommended NDT thickness design and/or reconstruction thickness as appropriate The results of the design analysis for each section are included on a separate page followed by the computer printouts for that section for easy reference. The deflection tests are at intervals of about 0.1 mile and the analysis and recommendations have been made over sections of roadway with logical termini. Determining these recommendations makes use of statistical procedures to prevent the adaption of overly conservative values. This procedure raises the possibility that the recommendations may not reflect the condition or strength at some points. Therefore, the condition of all the roadway surfaces should be monitored periodically to observe whether occasional spots of distress occur. The Braun Pavement Technologies program NDT was used for the analysis of the deflection data. NDT incorporates the structural relationships that were developed by MN/DOT Office of Research and Development and the thickness design relationships for flexible pavements from the "AASHTO Guide For Design of Pavement Structures -1986". The design equation used is for an 85 percent confidence level based on the average AASHTO recommended factors. The traffic volumes provided by the client were transformed into daily equivalent 18,000 pound axle loadings (ESALs) for the analysis. This conversion was based on statewide averages for vehicle distribution and weights as shown in Chapter 7, Pavement Design of the ROAD DESIGN MANUAL, Part II. A tabulation is included shoving the typical vehicle distributions and truck factors. The ESALs may vary by a considerable amount on low volume roads and, if it is found that the ESALs are not representative of the section, the analysis should be done over with the current traffic data. The analysis results and design recommendations for each of the sections evaluated are placed directly before the computer tabulations and plots for each of the sections evaluated. Lv� I ROAD RATER DATA DESIBN ANALY919 SECTIONS 4s CEDARVALE BLVD. FROM SILVER BELL ROAD TO BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE ANALYSIS This section is 3830 feet long and consists of 4.5 inches of asphalt on a plastic subgrade. 1987 ADT for this section was 8000 which equates to.a 1988 daily ESAL count of 74.7. The surface condition rating was 3.4 with low to medium severity longitidinal cracking, block cracking and transverse cracking located at a majority of the test points. The recommended allowable spring axle load based on deflections is 8-t6n per axle. t f DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 R -value 13 EGE = 20.0 inches Area 1 from Silver Bell Road to 233 feet south Overlay 1.0 inches Area 2 from 233 feet south of Silver Bell Road to 3500 south Overlay = 0.0 inchesl Area 3 from 3500 feet south of Silver Bell Road to Beau -D -Rue Drive Overlay = 2.5 inchesl DISCUSSION There are three distinct areas with regards to the deflection analysis. Area 1 is from Silver Bell Road to test location 233. Area 2 is from test location 233 to test location 3500. Area 3 is from test location 3500 to Beau -D -Rue Drive. The effective subgrade R -value is consistent throughout all areas. However, the in-place pavement strength and recommended overlay thickness varies within these areas. lThere are exceptions within Area 2 to the 0.0 inch overlay recommendations. These are at test locations 1945 and 2045. Overlay recommendations for these test points is 0.7 inches. A 1.0 inch overlay from Clearview to 200 feet south will increase the structure to a 9 -ton capacity. 2Area 3 exhibits the lowest pavement strength of all of the three } areas. Recommended allowable axle loads as low as 6.8 -tons per axle and overlay requirements as high as 2.4 inches are found in this area. It is recommended that a uniform 2.5 inch overlay be i applied for the entire length of Area 3 if this roadway is to carry 9 -ton loads. LO DISTRIBUTION FACTORS BY VEHICLE TYPE AND EQUIVALENT SINGLE AXLE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR CITY OF EAGAN ROADWAY: CEDARVALE RD FROM: SILVER BELL ROAD TO: BEAU -D -RUE DR * THE PERCENT AADT IS BASED ON THE VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY LISTED IN THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL. THIS DISTRIBUTION IS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE REPORTED PERCENT HCADT (VEHICLES 4-10). ** THE ESAL FACTORS LISTED WERE OBTAINED FROM THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY. �9 - LATEST AADT COUNT = 8000 1987 1988 PROJECTED AADT = 8106 REPORTED PERCENT HCADT = 5.00 TRAFFIC PROJECTION FACTOR. = 1.30 PERCENT DESIGN NUMBER. OF VEHICLE OF LANE VEHICLES ESAL DAILY DESIGN TYPE AADT AADT PER LANE FACTORS LANE ESAL 1 76.4 % X 4053 3097 X 0.0004 1.2 2 16.2 % X 4053 655 X 0.0070 = 4.6 3 2.4 % X 4053 98 X 0.0100 = 1.0 4 2.2 % X 4053 89 X 0.2300 = 18.8 5 1.4 % X 4053 58 X 0.4500 = 26.3 6 0.0 % X 405. 0 X 0.1500 0.0 7 0.1 % X 4053 3 X 0.3000 = 1: O 8 0.4 % X 4053 17 X 0.5900 = 10.1 9 0.0 % X 4053 O X ------ = 0.0 10 0.8 % X 4053 34 X 0.3400 = 11.7 100 ------ --------- 4053 -------- - DAILY ESAL ------------ 74.7 * THE PERCENT AADT IS BASED ON THE VEHICLE DISTRIBUTION FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY LISTED IN THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL. THIS DISTRIBUTION IS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE REPORTED PERCENT HCADT (VEHICLES 4-10). ** THE ESAL FACTORS LISTED WERE OBTAINED FROM THE MN/DOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL FOR TYPE OF ROADWAY. �9 - BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 08-433 DATE OF TEST IM/DIY): 6/16188 CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 75 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deg.F): 112-114 ASPHALT THICKNESS finches): 4.5 SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 j SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.85 COMMENTS: MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS. from: SILVER BELL ROAD to: BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE COMMENTS CIL SILVER BELL RD. PUNT CHS M -BLOCK, CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK CR L -LONG CR N -LONG CR M -TRANS CR M -LONG CR M -LONG CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR N -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR CIL RAHN RD L -BLOCK. CR M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CP. IRDMB CR L -TRANS CR PATCH/CULVERT L -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR CIL CLEARVIEN DR L -TRANS CR PVMT CHB TEST -SENSOR READINGS (MILS)- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AXLE LOAD LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DM BEFL SUBGRADE B.E. RESTRICTION (FEET)- (KIPS) (HZ) I1 12- 13 14- R -VALUE- 11NCHES) (TONS/RILE) 1 -- - 0 R -- --- - - --- - - -- 65 l 2.99 15.0 5.95 . 4.36 2.73 1.81 13 22.5 9.1 102 R 3.00 15.0 5.44 3.19 1.78 1.26 21 17.0 6.4 I 155 L 2.96 15.0 6.36 3.85 2.23 1.47 16 16.6 7.8 201 R 3.01 15.0 4.17 2.85 1.81 1.37 21 24.3 11.0 233 L ---- ---- --- -- -- - - - 250 L 2.97 15.0 5.B5 4.32 2.72 2.02 12 23.6 9.4 305 P. 2.99 15.0 5.07 3.49 1.98 1.36 18 21.3 9.5 354 L 2.99 15.0 4.46 3.12 1.68 1.17 21 22.2 10.2 398 R 3.03 15.0 4.16 3.30 2.50 1.91 12 32.9 13.2 1 I 453 L 3.05 15.0 5.32 3.62 1.97 1.14 19 20.1 9.2 504 R 3.00 15.0 5.17 3.79 2.70 1.92 13 26.2 10.5 556 L 2.99 15.0 5.72 3.79 2.72 1.57 15 21.3 9.1 600 R 2.95 15.0 3.49 3.02 2.54 2.11 9 40.3 16.3 648 L 3.02 15.0 5.19 3.75 2.20 1.52 16 22.7 9.8 710 R 3.06 15.0 4.36 3.3B 2.34 1.66 15 2B.6 12.0 i 751 L 3.00 15.0 4.53 2.91 1.54 0.95 24 19.9 9.6 B04 R 3.11 15.0 3.92 2.43 1.30 0.73 32 20.4 10.4 853 L 2.96 15.0 4.66 3.37 1.89 1.16 19 22.5 10.1 ( 902 R 3.02 15.0 4.57 3.05 1.69 1.02 22 20.9 9.9 t 953 L 3.05 15.0 4.22 2.94 1.49 0.94 24 21.9 10.4 1003 R 2.93 15.0 4.50 3.23 1.79 1.13 20 22.5 10.2 ! 1055 L 3.07 15.0 4.14 2.67 1.58 1.08 24 22.9 10.8 1 1100 R 2.92 15.0 5.06 4.08_ 2.34 1.03 15 23.0 9.8 1140 L 3.05 15.0 3.76 2.61 1.28 0.74 29 22.3 10.9 1146 R ---- -- -- - --- --- - -- -- 1200 R 3.14 15.0 4.55 3.10 1.71 0.98 23 21.6 10.2 1252 L 3.02 15.0 4.53 3.15 1.83 1.27 20 22.8 10.3 1301 R 3.09 15.0 6.24 4.37 2.72 1.73 14 21.1 8.8' 1354 L 2.93 15.0 4.46 3.21 2.01 1.37 18 24.3 10.6 I 1403 R 3.04 15.0 4.93 3.44 1.91 1.18 19 21.5 9.7 1451 L 2.96 15.0 4.49 3.32 1.86 1.17 19 23.4 10.4 1501 R 3.08 15.0 4.92 3.72 2.61 1.95 13 28.0 11.2 1544 L 3.07 15.0 3.75 2.81 1.54 0.98 25 25.0 11.7 1595 R 3.02 15.0 4.40 3.29 2.15 1.51 17 26.4 11.3 1645 L 3.11 15.0 6.62 4.93 3.04 1.97 12 22.1 8.8 1700 R 3.00 15.0 4.21 3.25 2.00 1.25 18 25.9 11.4 1749 L 3.04 15.0 6.02 4.IB 2.30 1.41 15 19.8 8.7 1805 R 3.00 15.0 5.05 3.84 2.42 1.57 15 24.7 10.3 I 1848 L 3.00 15.0 5.44 3.76 1.92 1.18 18 19.9 9.0 1900 R 3.02 15.0 5.07 4.03 2.69 1.80 13 26.9 10.8 191B R --- --- -- --- - --- -- - 1945 L 3.00 15.0 5.77 3.62 1.77 1.12 19 17.3 6.3 1975 R --- ---- --- - -- -- - -- - ' 1999 R 3.17 15.0 3.70 2.89 1.90 1.30 20 29.1 13.1 COMMENTS CIL SILVER BELL RD. PUNT CHS M -BLOCK, CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK CR L -LONG CR N -LONG CR M -TRANS CR M -LONG CR M -LONG CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR N -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR CIL RAHN RD L -BLOCK. CR M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CP. IRDMB CR L -TRANS CR PATCH/CULVERT L -BLOCK. CR L -BLOCK. CR M -BLOCK. CR CIL CLEARVIEN DR L -TRANS CR PVMT CHB I BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION NO: 88-433 (CONTINUED) DATE OF TEST IN/D/Y): 8/16188 CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 75 TEMPERATURE RANGE Ide4.F): 112-114 from: SILVER BELL ROAD ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 4.5 to: BEAU - D -RUE DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR.: 1.85 COMMENTS: MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS TEST --SENSOR READINGS (MILS)- EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE AILE LOAD LOCATION FORCE FRED DEFL DEFL DER DEFL SUBBRADE B.E. RESTRICTION (FEET) (KIPS) I112) D2 12 13 N R -VALUE IINCRES) ITONS/AXLE) COMMENTS 2045 L 3.02 15.0 6.73 5.42 2.29 .1.36 12 19.9 6.3 M -TRANS CR 2100 R 3.01 15.0 4.50 3.34 2.14 1.44 17 25.5 11.0 N -TRANS CR 2157 L 3.08 15.0 4.15 3.00 1.87 1.24 21 25.1 11.3 11 -TRANS CR 2200 R 3.02 15.0 4.11 3.12 1.98 1.35 18 26.7 11.7 2254 L 3.05 15.0 3.81 2.75 1.76 1.28 22 26.6 12.0 2301 R 2.96 15.0 4.60 3.43 2.06 1.43 17 24.7 10.6 2348 L 3.02 15.0 5.24 3.61 2.08 1.25 18 21.0 9.4 2404 R 2.95 15.0 3.93 3.17 2.20 1.65 14 31.0 12.9 2448 L 2.97 15.0 4.97 3.35 1.99 1.27 19 21.3 9.6 M -TRANS CR 2503 R 2.97 15.0 4.53 3.33 2.20 1.52 16 25.8 11.0 2553 L 3.00 15.0 4.00 2.97 1.97 1.39 10 27.2 11.9 2610 R 3.10 15.0 4.39 3.66 2.39 1.57 15 28.9 12.1 2655 L 3.06 15.0 5.24 3.85 2.50 1.77 14 24.8 10.2 M -TRANS CR 2700 R 3.03 15.0 5.19 3.87 2.59 1.80 14 25.5 10.4 2725 R -- ------- --- - -- - - - - CIL CEDAP.VIEN DR 2735 R --- --- ---- ---- ---- --- - PVMT CHB 2750 L 3.13 15.0 3.53 2.49 1.57 1.24 25 27.0 12.6 2800 R 3.00 15.0 4.68 4.00 2.44 1.75 13 28.4 11.5 2653 L 3.05 15.0 3.40 2.7B 1.79 1.30 21 26.2 11.9 2901 R 2.96 15.0 3.43 2.82 2.05 1.55 15 33.9 14.6 2950 L 2.98 15.0 5.71 4.07 2.47 1.71 14 22.2 9.3 L -TRANS CR 3001 R 3.07 15.0 3.86 2.96 2.10 1.48 17 29.8 12.9 N -TRANS CR 3045 L 3.15 15.0 4.96 3.80 1.95 1.09 19 22.8 10.2 3105 R 3.05 15.0 3.67 2.76 2.02 1.51 17 31.0 13.5 H -SUPER 3147 L 3.05 15.0 5.99 3.99 2.19 1.37 16 19.2 8.6 N -TRANS CR 3200 R 3.06 15.0 2.42 1.81 1.43 1.17 22 38.0 18.4 H -SUPER 3254 L 2.97 15.0 3.96 2.90 2.02 1.46 18 28.0 12.1 L -SUPER 3314 R 2.98 15.0 3.41 2.27 1.40 1.10 28 24.9 12.0 H -SUPER 3351 L 3.06 15.0 3.45 2.69 2.18 1.46 16 33.8 14.7 L -SUPER 3406 R 3.10 15.0 5.06 3.71 2.27 1.53 16 24.0 10.3 R -SUPER. 3452 L 3.03 15.0 4.38 3.79 2.59 0.99 17 26.8 11.5 N -TRANS CR 3501 R 3.07 15.0 7.24 5.22 2.84 1.79 12 19.4 8.0 L -GRADE 3545 L 3.04 15.0 7.29 4.66 2.22 1.23 14 15.9 7.4 3557 L --- -- - --- -- -- - - - PVMT CHB 3596 R 3.08 15.0 8.73 6.47 2.03 1.40 11 15.4 6.8 CIL CEDARVALE DR 3646 L 3.05 15.0 3.91 2.72 1.59 1.22 24 24.6 11.4 3701 R 3.03 15.0 8.74 6.95 2.11 1.36 10 16.2 6.0 N -GRADE 3741 L 2.97 15.0 3.76 2.74 1.76 1.09 22 25.9 11.8 3754 R -- - --- --- - ____ - - - BEGIN NEN PVMT 3830 R -- --- --- -- -- _-_ __ - - CIL BEAU DE RUE DR BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION N0: 88-433 DATE OF TEST (MID/'i): 6/161BB CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 75 TEMPERATURE RANGE (deo.F): 112-114 ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 4.5 SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 j SEASDNAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.85 1,COMMENTS: MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS. from: SILVER BELL ROAD to: BEAU -D -RUE DRIVE i EFFECTIVE SUBGRADE R -VALUE O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ............. C/L SILVER BELL RD. A� FVMT CHG I 4q (L�_ �❑❑ pk Ffjj—COpp�jjFk 648 -® 'tr _ L"=�P�E'1fCE'R �., - M -BLOCK' CF: rz -� M-BLOCIL CR J LOCK CR , zT ERT eeAT��-c LL /f% C %� MM-BLOCKCR $ P6Krg1 R@Ep E.XIEW DR :45 - ---- f c100 � -®� MM TRANS CR M -TRANS CR ( 7f� _ M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CR M -TRANS CR PVMTCE28RVIEW DR a CR _®—-UF' J ��L.{{-5SUPER EE6 ADD CR -06a � E -`1C GrC TCHRFi'JALE DR '95 _ 9E8IKIDNEW FVMT 38! � - C/L BEAU DE RUE DR 4000 - - -0 - 10 20 i 40 --5 i _ -bi -- 70 80 90 100 S� BRAUN PA,VENENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - CONNISSION NO: BB -433 DATE OF TEST WD/Y1: 8116/88 CITY OF EAGAN CEADARVALE BOULEVARD DAILY ESAL's: 15 TEMPERATURE RAN5E 1deg.F1: 112-114 from: SILVER BELL ROAD ASPHALT THICINES9 linchesl: 4.5 to: BEAU - D -RUE DRIVE SURFACE CONDITION RATING: 3.4 SEASONAL CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.85 ICONNENTS: RODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE TO DRY CONDITIONS. EFFECTIVE PAVEMENT GRANULAR THICKNESS (inches) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 �- O -1' 1 1 1 1' 1' �' �' 1' 1' 1 C/L SILVER BELL RD. E ._� PVMT CHS NSCCC - - N R N C 'to - VIP- 'CPR , M -BLOCK CR MM -BLOCK CR �# _ L/�LOCHNCRD zz! _ . CH p EFT CR I MM-LBLOCK CR pFpVKCR DR TRANSRAN tni: M -TRANS CR ` LJ SCI _ M -TRANS CR 412 _ . t34 - i�gq4— "'44 — M—TRAMS CR - 5Q M -TRANS CR R50WTCEH8RVIEW DR s;siil �E3.7 — - JU�J - pF �y -PE CR f - g54 L t ��,,4 —SUPER 9 PER Fp ADE CR �MMYCccTTpCEbRRVALE DR �jQi = PEGFNDFJEW PVMT C/L BEAU DE RUE DR 41DOO - _ 0 Ill 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 51J SI BRAUN PAVEMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - COMMISSION N0: BB -433 DATE OF TEST (NIVY): VIVIB DAILY ESA' -'s: 75 TEMPEP.RTUF.E RANGE ideq.P : 111-114 ASPHALT THICKNESS (inches): 4.5 SURFACE COMITION RATING: 3.4 SEASBNAI. CUFFEMIGN FACTOR: LBS COMMENTS* MODIFIED SEASONAL CORRECTION DUE CITY OF EAGAN. CEADARVALE BOULEVARD TO DRY CONDITIONS. from: SILVER BELL ROAD to: BEAU—D—RUE DRIVE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE AXLE LOAD (tons/axle) O 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 4 I .I : .1. .:. .:. .1. .:. .:. .i .I C/L SILVER BELL RD. PVMT CHG M—L NGSCF' t:Z ePbE'KCER M—FLOCK CR M—BLOCK{{ CR t—p! COD =s F A L UWRT M—BLOCK CR CL1r��l,EAEK-IEW DR P T CAGNFHSiGCR —T 'ANS CR M—TRANS CR M—TRANS CR M—TRANS CR PIMTCEABRVIEW DR �-ZTRM ER. CR fat C= dC _ CR _ — KA E EiLeg1TRRgC€b,R.VALE DR 4b _ MM BEGINDrJEEEW RVMT 3830 — C/L BEAU DE RUE DR _. F F KIT�T-T--T-Tw-T�--- --- — -I F I I I _ 0 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1P 20 1 DATA TABULATIONS AND PLATS The data tabulations consist of a heading section which contains information relevant to the section tested. The name of the section tested and information regarding its location is in the upper right of each page. The left part of the heading contains the date tested, the estimated Daily Equivalent 18,000 pound single axle loadings (ESALs) that are applied to the pavement, temperature of the asphalt mat at approximately one inch below the surface at the time of test, thickness of all the bound asphalt layers, a Structural Rating Number, A Seasonal Correction Factor, and a line for comments relevant to the section or the analysis. The Structural Rating Number is determined by the Road Rater operator and is based on the following scale: 5 new pavement (no cracks) 4 unconnected linear cracking 3 large block pattern cracking 2 alligator cracking 1 potholes and loss of surfacing The Seasonal Correction Factor is used to calculate the deflection that is expected to occur during the spring thaw period. The tabulations contain ten numeric columns and one comment column. These are described as follows: TEST LOCATIONS: A reference used to locate the position of the test point, usually in distance from the beginning of the section. FORCE: The amount of dynamic load applied to the pavement. It is listed in kips. One kip equals 1000 pounds. FREQ: The number of load pulses applied each second. DEFL '#1..#4: These four columns contain the measured deflection at each test point in mils. One mil is equal to 0.001 inch. EFFECTIVE SUBGRADE R -VALUE: The effective strength of the subgrade soil as calculated from the resilient modulus which is based on the deflections. It is expressed as an Effective R -value based on the back calculated resilient modulus of the subgrade soil. EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALENT (EGE): This is the granular equivalent thickness that is needed to match the overall pavement deflection. DEFLECTION TESTING USING THE ROAD RATER The Model 2000 Road Rater is a trailer mounted device which uses an electrohydraulic force generating mechanism that is capable of applying a vibratory load of variable force and frequency to the pavement. The Road Rater generates the load force by hydraulically oscillating a 2000 pound lead mass up and down. The force generated is proportional to the amplitude of the oscillation. This applied force is measured electronically by three load cells attached to the load plate. The dynamic load generated follows a sinusoidal wave form and its amplitude and frequency are varied to suit the pavement Iand analysis procedure. During the loading, the pavement deflections are measured at four ' locations on the pavement by seismic geophones. One geophone is located at the center of the load area, and the other three ' geophones are located at 12, 24 and 36 inches from the center of the load plate. The four geophones measure the deflections simultaneously, resulting in .a measurement of the shape of the deflection basin. With the use of elastic layer analysis, the strength of the individual layers of a pavement can be determined from the deflection basin shape characteristics. The weaker a pavement structure is with respect to the subgrade, the steeper the deflection basin will be. The deflection values inversely represent the strength of the specific area tested. This testing method is sensitive to the pavement temperature and to the time of year. However, factors have been developed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation to adjust the deflections to represent a springtime deflection of a pavement with a mat temperature of 80 degrees F. The testing is performed at a selected spacing to form a statistical sample of the pavement strength. Variation in pavement strength does occur between test points. Traffic volume, pavement thickness and subgrade soil type information also is required to determine the allowable spring axle loads for the pavement segment. If at any time they are.found to be different, the allowable spring axle load should be recalculated. The deflection tests provide extremely valuable information for setting spring axle load limits and for design purposes. The magnitude of the deflections will remain relatively constant throughout the life of a pavement and will begin increasing only when pavement distress develops. There are indications, however, that the shape of the deflection basin will change within the normal life of a pavement. Pavement condition, during its normal life, should be rated by its roughness or rideability and the surface condition. The surface condition of the pavement in the vicinity of each test point is recorded at the time of the test, but the roughness must be measured separately. AXLE LOAD RESTRICTION: This column contains the recommended axle load restriction that would result in a spring deflection equal to the deflection that would result from the design section. The design section is determined from the design procedure described in the "AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures -198618. COMMENTS: This column contains the Road Rater operator's comments regarding the pavement in the vicinity of each test point or location information. A profile plot of the AXLE LOAD RESTRICTION is also produced if the test location references are distances. Plots are usually j not produced if the tests are from large paved surfaces such as parking lots. Plots are also produced for the Effective Subgrade R -Value and EFFECTIVE GRANULAR EQUIVALENT thickness if called for in the analysis. The plots are proportionally scaled for both axis so that the information can be quickly reviewed to determine locations where changes occur. PRa'�"T 4 b I AAATzAws CASK Sc�islen YayeronA»oclatee. Inc. _ _ _inµntira.alar.yet.. aPlannarn_ _ 9/19/88 aao r.. r............. • afa�W n 0.0 • W-ar Droning Title LOCATION MAP CEDARVALE BOULEVARD EAGAN, MINNESOTA Comm. No. F Sheet no. I EXISTING EGGS 6 ,SIT. i UK NEW BITA o ¢411'7r6, EMO EXISTING G� Bath 8618 riTa EXISTING osis lop EN �JY4-�'aY4'dlY Drawing Title Comm. No. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 4212 2A7/Rama"" a Me` npNn0ne` O MINNESOTA UnI`� 6M 1161161201a A�r 8.Nl SSWII�O EAGAN, 1. CE& ro1'4[E R.B.O d TREET IMPROVEMENTS 6eperna KmmmnaPle"Is " EAGAN, MINNESOTA /7/891 ad r..�,enrn.....r 0 r�....r.ua m eau a euamaer 4212 w urown tsy. R.B.C. Date: 2/7/89 CRIYIr13 a F e Z 9 ;a 3 f 9 I mitMalea ISTREET IMPROVEMENTS llAssociates, aysroa ! I.C. CEDARVALE BOULEVARD MmmpM & "W 0 ""°.U&M M4 "—EAGAN, MINNESOTA Ip••yl• Mare Werplla Yl 0/1L'&N-Wlltl Comm. No. 421,2 REMOVE & REPLACE •r MC• 7 f I 40 0 a pS aft l / � R B , C 8ehelen � A".Ysysronoocletss, & 1 inpv";;8 9nr�q°n o Plnm°n Ns&.Wa A• w 0 04n o Drawing Title Comm. No. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 4212 EAGAN, MINNESOTA I 2D n (� i a •••.•�-..•��••�• E`dCdVlWIV1VlE201`d SE jOjDMY B jaLO�OY . �.000Y V"oalo .iou ! r"6 a -CEDvgnv E BonFE/�VI�-D--zussf Nac xMajou 21BEE1 IWbL5.OAEINEV i2 1515 pLOMu Ba: Dtoriva lips goww' Ho' rot vw i ps r i a roe *w l � r� � - .o'T' �• O1'T boy wo 1 00 ►`� b LO YCY: ` •SIS T � i. - "S•9. r►' ci.% .. Hca .ra �re•�M e �•11 ,ro p. 00-04 cc coo am /7/8 Drawing Title Comm. No. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1 4212 0 W nLaglw• lansyors ®Pasoan iE AG AN., .M I N N E S O T Aft"wrtu •vw� Or�e1LLb WV O OtiOiOW 1 2 2F )rawn By: W. K N. SAW—CUT BIT.& REMOVE INC.B 0-6I8 ODNC. Ch %— 22' REMOVE BIT. DITCH B C,M.R W#xC -RIES I 1 .2331 BINDER COURSE {I —1/2'*23.41 MODIFIED WEAR COURSE PAVING FABRIC AND TACK EXISTING PAVEMENT (VARIES) REBUILD SHOULDER WITH 3/4"MINUS FILL _EXISTING DITCH 100-16 CRUSHED AS; REQUIRED. TYPICAL SECTION FROM NICHOLS ROAD TO 700`'NORTH PARIES 5d-60 8of 141 46 12� 8� ;# 2.331 LEVELING COURSE AS RI 1-1/2"#234.1 MODIFIED WEAR COURSE PAVING FABRIC AND TACK EXISTING PAVEMENT SAW -CUT 8 REMOVE BITUMINOUS REPLACE AS,REQUIRED. TYPICAL SECTION FROM SILVER BELL ROAD TO ABOVE llayeronmit d Anoethtes,, In c. rl ,Drawing Title CEDARVALE BOULEVARD 4212 e/Is/Be 7...,..m.,.. A'm.:..u.;.»p..0 eey„_.�_=-owl EAGAN9 M.INNESOIA l 4 No. W.K.N. Date: 9/19/1 12' 12' 12' 12' Drawing Title CEDARVALE, BOULEVARD `-�m••(�• •Mn B Rr"Yer• B IO)1•Ysvtl.r•. a.sa(oEAGAN, MINNESOTA ;omm. No. 4212 Sheet no. 3 01 -o+ N A► vocl 4 � O� co �Sb P Jia �,•� ,P � e W. G A� Y . •: r A. N J U Z ALL NOTED PROPERTIES ARE WITHIN NEI/4, SI9, T27, R23 Drawn 3y Drawing Title Comm. No. D.J.H. Orr ASSESSABLE PROPERTY 4212.00 Yeyeron 6 Date- - Associates, Inc. CEDARVALE_ .BOULEVARD Sheet -no: - NOV. Basin«n • sunefen • Plan"" 1988 Man 11M Sees'"' "eeee 0 ereNwr.o nen . w•mae 'O EAGAN. MINNESOTA § Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting VACATE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOT is, BLOCK 1, CBATTERTON PONDS B. Vacate Drainage and Utility Easement (Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds) --In response to a petition submitted by the property owner of the above referenced lot, Council authorized a public hearing to be held on March 7th to discuss this issue. Enclosed on page (&I_ is a copy of the legal description and related area proposed to be vacated. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the staff has not received any objections to this petition. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of the drainage and utility easement as described (Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Pond). f lJ IVI H IV 1-1 7 208.00 589.43'16'E %-I 1 e CAAVWW Ov rLa c. v CROPS . \w y/ w LOT • E 1; 1�z3o `.�pN Description of drainage and utility easement to be vacated: 911 that part of the drainage and utility easement over Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 15, thence South 67 15' 00" West a distance of 35.00 feet to the point of beginning, thence Borth 18 59' 52" West a distance of 101.22 feet, thence South 60 171 07" West a distance of 114.26 feet and there terminating, excepting the southwesterly and southeasterly 10.00 feet thereof measured at right angles to Chatterton Road and Chatterton Court. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting VACATE A PORTION OF STREET C. Vacate a Portion of Street Right-of-way (Heritage Lane - North of Yankee Doodle Road) --On February 7th, the Council received the staff request to vacate this abandoned right-of-way and scheduled aublic hearing to be held on March 7, 1989. Enclosed on page is a legal description and location map showing the portion o the Heritage Lane right-of-way proposed to be vacated. All notices have been published in a legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies. Comments have been received regarding the necessity to retain a utility easement over this description due to the existing utilities within this area. However, the public right-of-way no longer needs to be retained due to the relocation of Heritage Lane lining up with Blue Cross Road to the west. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny the vacation of Heritage Lane as described and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. N pO+ MW ~°► m Off' W 103 » e ta 10M m a ° Err0 g C snct Cr C a C.a ass°' Cr Ct a r Lot 16, Block I Was Addition DESIGN D4-12 HOUSE C9G R/W = — 4 r LOT I VINCENT J. K#NNEDY NST. LIMITS IEMOVE PAVEMENT AS — IIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER HOUSE TO BE r == _�— REMOVED fly HOUSE L_ ---j RaAD BEGIN RETAININGWALL I +33, . . . 1� so o ao 10C scale teat - Existing Drisesay LOT 2 ROY F. & MARGIE L. OTIS Portion of Neritege Lane Proposed To Be Vacated HOUSE AR., I-S•F END RETAINING WALL STA. 14+95, 49 LT. F.F END RETAINING WALL STATA. 14+a6 , 4g�RT. FF Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting CONSIDERATION OF CONTRACT AWARD/LEXINGTON AVE - RESERVOIR A. Contract 88-24, Consideration of Contract Award (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) --Ever since the bids were originally received for consideration of contract award in September of 1988, this item has been continued periodically pending the resolution of the property acquisition from HUD. In January of this year, consideration of contract award was further continued until March 7 with concurrence from the low bidder (Brown Tank Minneapolis of Eagan) subject to consideration of a change order with contract award providing for a contract bid adjustment to accommodate price increases that have occurred during the 6 - months delay -of contract award consideration. The City Attorney's office has been working progressively with HUD to close on the property in accordance with Council action of February 21. However, it is questionable whether a title insurance issue can be resolved by March 7 which would allow us to award this contract. Further delays in consideration of contract award will result in the inability to complete this facility during 1989 and will require to be out of service during the late spring of 1990 which could affect our water service availability. The City Attorney will provide an update with a recommendation for Council consideration at the meeting on March 7. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To award/cancel Contract 88-24 (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) and if awarded, authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. V1 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/NAEGELE OUTDOOR ADVERTISING B. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to Allow Billboard Advertising Sign in an LI District --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their January 24 , 1989, meeting to consider an application by Naegele Outdoor Advertising requesting a conditional use permit to allow a 40' tall "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S&W Industrial Acres. The APC is recommending denial. At the request of the applicant, the item was continued from the February 7 to February 21 meeting. Another letter was received, a copy is enclosed on page, requested further continuance to the March 7 City Council meeting. For a copy of the staff report, refer to pages? 3 through �. For a copy of the agtion taken by h APC, refer to those minutes enclosed on pages d 3 throughFor a copy of the City Attorney's findings relating to bill oard advertising signs, refer to pages VS through P (� . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 -foot tall, "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S&W Industrial Acres. NAEGELE Naegele Outdoor Advertising. Inc. of the Twin Cities February 17, 1989 Mr. Vic Ellison Mayor City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Mayor Eillison and Members of the City Council: We respectfully request a continuance of Naegele Outdoor Advertising's application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a billboard advertising sign on Light Industiral District Lot 2, Block 1 of the S & W Industrial Acres addition, along Highway 13 in the SW 1/4 of Section 19, from the City Council meeting agenda of February 21, 1989 to the next Council hearing scheduled for March 7, 1989. The purpose of this continuance is an effort on the part of the land owner of the above noted parcel, to resolve the outstanding financial obligations and assessments due the City as noted in the Planning Staff's report of December 15, 1988. We have been advised by the land owner that he will be meeting with Mr. Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance, regarding the assessments due and hopes to resolve this matter at that time. Please direct your staff to contact me should this request for a change in venue prove problematic. Sincer p Y\00-� Arthur R. Dean Real Estate Services ARD/bkw CC: Mr. Jim Sturm City Planner Karen Finnegan Clerk 1700 West 78th Street • Minneapolis. MN 55423.612/869-1900 7apnet 612-869-3897 ra :: DM W #Ili#W OU&TECTv . CORDITIOMML OBE PZMIT APPLICANTS MAMMA OUTDOOR AWMATIBI00. XMC LOCATION: LOT 2. RLO= 1. B i • ZMDUBTRIAL eCRas y XXISTING EONIDGS LI 114M SMOVOIS AL) DATE OF PUBLIC MEMIRING s ROCMK= 22. A988 - JANUARY =24 r 4909 DATE OF REPORT: DRCMNJ= 15. 1988 (RBVISRD REPORTED BY: PLAIRIIRG AND MEGIHEERING DXPARTN�S APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 40' -tall, 'V' -shaped billboard advertising sign on lot 2, block 1, S i W Industrial Acres. This lot is located between Highway 13 and the frontage road that serves E -Z Mini Storage to the north. Currently, lot 2 is vacant. if and When that lot develops, that business would not be allowed a business sign if the billboard is approved. Comdescribes a 'business sign' as any sign upon which there is any name, designation, or advertising Which has as its purpose business, professional or commercial advertising and which is related directly to the use of the premises upon Which the sign is located. The signage area measures 10.5' s 36', totaling 378 square feet. If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. There shall be a one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot. 2. The closest portion of the sign to the property line shall be 10 feet. 3. No business sign shall be permitted an lot 2 if this advertising sign is approved. 4. This development shall fulfill its past outstanding financial obligations as identified in the staff's report. A-fw=r- �7 2 FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: In researching the Einancial Jkistorical records for th s parcel, ^it was determined that this property has fulfilled its financial -Abligatioms relating to trunk area sanitary sewer, lateral benefit from trunk nater slain, lateral benefit from trunk sanitary sewer &nd *.runk #Lrea storm sewer (but only a portion of the property). It Las been Discovered .*.bat this property has inadvertently Leen omitted iron fulfilling its financial obligations relating :to..tb! following ite"' ITEM FHOJ = = jWp Trunk Area Water 232 $1,115/ac 6.65 ac $ 8,008 Water Availability 232 - 2,015/ac 6.85 ac 13,803 Charge (WAC) Trunk Area Storm Sewer (Remaining Area) 186 0.083/of 68,271 of (1.57 ac) 5,666 TOTAL OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL OBLIGATION $28,477 If it is required that this outstanding financial obligation is made as a condition of approval for the petitioned Conditional Use Permit, the final financial obligation should be calculated in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final approval. ap :--.-.-to a specif Ic.1parcal 49' -assessment history Im per assessment* of record. z relating to -the fiUmbici- for Council consideratSis IM Water Trunk Water Availability Charge Storm Sewer Trunk TOTAL PROPOSED _-Vl#ZlSj&C -.4-0S 4PC _4 9*008 '0034fa6-- _':AAS ac 23,803 .4043,/Sf 48#271 of .-I.,5*666 FINRNCM OBLIGATION 428,477 to ,�,b »s • ' W INDUSTRIAL �•v ...� !r.••+n' .... •ny,. r./! lY!' WAl• r0l. Ar Ikl, .15.4 , do u,r.. r ..� • ' LCT I'� r;► j� i 'e! t,�. 010 ��,��,�a�� • .:�►, J � • .+fir ° _ � � t for` ,• i, r �, a r z @ \ �r oe ., . f Y•`. n l . y I M .' r it. c I r� • � .,'Y,. ,�,` � � a.. �' .i''. it � f �' • • � � a ��•� 4� ��' - . �y� 'V',� • % � �' . �lr1r "'. rp fwrr. w M.r.y � 4 w 1% j 1 ��• rr.w .�� /A tl , &RUM LA► 6" jlmmm�m C.O;WF*X hiviro WE AWN W�A M: 6"It Y/"4r M .y 1 wy000, led R.- �� .i F. IIY t � •`.., ,i. +r1 4x- . To tIT a w• MLR . F 9 it � F •��: P'� 1i f 1• Co p. i1 ,� S � s. ' as•i� I F 6 so -if s ` o u.lA 2 -M"%40 WA'TrI: 11Vr11A%%L%T%j C0.$5 %!Cars .��. •.C. �.. 1 '11a A. r M •y �. plrM owe'. Ca d, As 4 .r all n• ' Y s r �,� I X54 �4r � yy �f� � �'� • k n��. k .Se � II �'�'' �• •. � r.� /, �i 'i �' E, ,..� �• a L:•.y .. / silo io�� I t >a •' • I• STof'M SEwEC TRv.wti - QZ.ab % of 16.VS Ac*Es r: �'� 1 4( 'IX #� � 11 �;• .. i'uti:•� ''1': .h i�;t�� F. it00 2 rr ✓.v Aa ti �' N ♦ r`� r , ; • `� R r •��•'` 1�' �.y��Ug Y`' �4,� J ^ w'lt • .. I'S 1�ii.�� Of u'• ' � r/ . s •:r9G• ,fib �L1 I r a' � d d ' •2p1 ,.:r r r1' 'l�.i 'i•��i':: M t7 s. Y.s 4•� . �' ,� v l• s 'i, , '.a �' G 1 •: lyI -•: �j•'1tit7 ��'9R.. ll. n .,5 r 1 � ��• , i VVV • �1 _1.. 1' / ` �,giyr• . � ' Isis �\ ,1 � " �� ,�' rYa t'�.• �!•'�� r .i . r. , �' , .I..n. ••�• 4' �Ty +�'``r 1 5�y_ � , �yy%1' \• ,. ' .' K �l T•• �.Jq, ••M It 4 '• �!• ad rn Y S j. 1 1 •� !� � , r. l 7� y ,I��y 4 & J.. it ,� �, 1 t �1 , \ h� 1\ I I � .IrJ. ,,. •: •' " � T a! gyryp.� ..if :�. F p}pp�,(�([ a ,,' � .//� , h�-sb;' , � :al��_•` �o ;: `)_ ;;. �•� iii _ -cull • rin ILM el V Mf'�%+.1dd!'eK 9�' •InI 4•/w✓:rel ... +4N'=1'.W.4•.fl}�•ehplrl.sq�l:• �.,, 'Y.:1111A rte:. r. a if - as ye.. j [ �- X50- _� )S ��K•.. .r:-SF ' � •tib.: i . 7 -_ ._ ..��_.' : wv0i7/1t.�A •. (nww I\ 4 •i IT > y�•�• � Ls MSO 3.0rrr 1, I sj° op t14 .'n .rf.,• ;.:� �. i• L� .�i f_ '.. 46 6/7&0 C GSl fIMSUBjECT PARCEL — ¢• '.l - �i 1` 'YDS •IS Nt"^ + _ - rC►p YY a}� 1 4AJ .�v�C-ls .� �j:`ti.yT [ V 1 T` IG 03 city of eagan:11NATER ,�„�: starwara PUBLIC - - WORKS MASTER 'PLAN DEPAR i_ MINI' STORAGE Advisory Panning :aaaissim Mty of Eagan 3830 Piot Snob Road -- ' pagan, M 55122 `. ._. Dear :omission ?femberess This will acknowledge receipt of your notice of a second Putlic Hearing on Thursday, December 229 1988relative to the application of Naegele Outdoor Advertizing to erect a billboard on Lot 2, Plock 1 in the S and til Industrial acres along highway #23s Again, this notice cases as somewhat of a ,surprise and certainly as a dira,ppointmert in light of all the part sign denials. Not more than a year ago or so we discussed the.possibility of a small business identification situ along new highs y 513 an the back of cis prcject now that the traffic has been permanently diverted off old highway 813, and weretrefuseds We were told at the time to conform with the ordinance which places a real hardship on our ability to advertise our onsite tudaess. Vie accepted that decision and are trying to live with its The thought that the My would now entertain an enormous billloard leads us to 4pestion that deeisdme I also understand that like 1694 and 3358 which the'MKy is trying to control that it was their intention to oontrel the Dsdirsffi #`13 area as well. = .. ,T In light of the above we Ippon _the 31kelihood.that a billboard sign would now be eonaldered m the propel tg nwt�dosaa 46'ass Unfortunately, I the"' be with ip famnr' Ton the aristmar Rw4aay in another Stats, but let this Uttar eoae�y ale rasgest objection. Very truly yam's, ;. es Page 2/EAGAN AWIMT 3 The following lop 1. Developers Teak -Vorce --.Scott IOastlaY bpd. Ab, 2. SpecialAsaessaeat3gl�'s ski -1hert,mu'iscai o'de s Tom IMMMI IN NOW and times. _ — Item C under old nosiness (coventsy Pass — troatter companies) and Items E i F under Now Business (Ordinance Amendment — Subdivision Platting Requirements and Ordinance Amendment—jftblic Design of Street and Utility Improvements) were continued.to.thq January 26, 1989, Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Trygg moved, Nerkley seconded, the action to approve the agenca as amended. All voted in favor. December 22. 1982. Member Graves requested a change on page 4, paragraph 1, the first sentence should read •Be stated that the total volume of issues were too great to take any action at that time.• voracek moved, Trygg seconded, the notion to approve the December 22, 19881 Advisory Planning Commission minutes as amended. All voted in favor. At this point, Chairman Pawlenty explained the Advisory Planning Commission procedures to the Commission and the public. .. Chairman Pawlenty opened the Yirst public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow a billboard advertising sign in a Light Industrial district on Lot 2, Kock 1, 6 a N Industrial Acres, along Sigbway 13 in the southwest quarter d Seat%a 19. City Planner Stora summarized tbe�"testion er.the' Commission. Arthur Dean, representative.Zor Informed the Council that conditional use permits for billboard advertising signs had been allowed in the post. -Me further stated they had alerted the adjacent property owners and mmogele feels the request is within the ordinance. There was no public ccaent. m s ?age 3/ZAGAN'MwISORy ,74nuary,24,..Am' member graves %m Storm stated about Six regarding the past sly pounds for the asnial.. Outlined the sign X402 of a pylon sign aaa as 'mea-ber t_ �ti.... PrIel a. _ 10 kol riia _ nasties r .ia he mit the sign exceeded the squareootaicarat.< Member Vorecek gnestiossd�t tore #odao .,��yy^ia -. expressway if it was within the Wiscretioa of "thd•CoaaolL -11r.-Sturm stated yes. Mr. Voracok questioned the number -at billboards presently In Eagan. Mr. Sturm showed their locations. Mr.-Vorkley asked if there were any freeway standards regarding billboards. 4W,-41tarm stated no. - Chairman Pawlenty stated he felt billboards were bad aesthetics and that the size exceeded code. ye felt the City sbotad restrict billbarard requirements even further. member Hiller.stated he felt the code should be changed to allow applicants to know the rules. Graves moved, Markley seconded, the motion to close the public bearing and deny the application for a conditional use permit to allow a billboard advertising sign in a Light Industrial district on Lot 21 Block 1, e a V Industrial Acres, along Highway 13 in the southwest quarter of Section l9, as submitted by Haegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. All voted in favor. TWA COMM 100 722 ADDITION — IHDHmai, LAND COMM Chairman Pawlenty opened the "next .ppunblic hearing regarding the application for a preliminary plat coasistia�g of two lots and an outlet on 19.5 Limited Business zoned acres withjnSown Centre 100 Planned Development located south of .11own Centre Drive and north Of O'Leary Lake in the northeast quarter of Section 15. City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the apgtication Charles Bortholdi (Federal %and Company) showed the location of the proposed plat to theOommissioa. Am szplaiped the two abases of the project and the square footage# B"I sad pcoperty:HoainQ. Be stated the plat met City requirements. Be further slated there were other representatives from Federal Land _00pany available for questions. Tom Bolger, 3528 widgeon Lane, had concerns regarding the drainage to the lake and the -view of the buildings from his property. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch explained the drainage for the project. Member Voracek questioned the building elevation and asked if there were any vents on the toof. sr. Sturm stated there was no �A/illl.r` J J '_ v �. M E M 0 R A A D D M TO: Jim Sheldon FROM: Joe Earley DATE: February 13, 1989 RE: Municipal Authority to Regulate Billboards Our File No.: 206-5316 (OOE) Jim: The City of Eagan is currently examining its authority to regulate off-site advertising in general and billboards in particular. Since this would involve the regulation of commercial speech, the constitutional test that must be met is as follows: 1. The regulation must directly advance a significant government interest; 2. It must be a legitimate time, place and manner restriction; 3. The regulation should be content neutral; and 4. Ample open alternative channels of communication should remain. I have found three cases in Minnesota that further explain these constitutional requirements. The first is Arcadia Development Corn. v. City of Bloomington, 125 N.W.2d 846 (1964). In this case, the Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's finding that Bloomington's denial of a permit was arbitrary and capricious. Their reasoning was that the Council gave absolutely no reason for the denial. The Supreme Court further went on to say 0... The City can unquestionably regulate, even stringently, the use, size and position of business signs and advertising billboards but the regulations as applied must still bear a reasonable relation to the purposes they are meant to attain." Id. at 851. The second case is Naeggle Outdoor Adv. Co. v. Village of Minnetonka, 162 N.W.2d 206 (1968). In this case, Minnetonka passed a zoning ordinance prohibiting billboards in residential districts and ordering the removal of all non -conforming billboards. The Court examined two issues. The first, whether a municipality has the power to prohibit by zoning ordinance the use of land in residential districts for billboard advertising and secondly, if the City could require the removal of pre-existing billboards. The Court held that the zoning ordinance was constitutional and stated 'If the challenged MA 1 restriction is reasonably related to promoting the general welfare of the community or any other legitimate police power objective, the fact that aesthetic considerations were a significant factor in motivating its adoption cannot justify holding it unconstitutional." Id. at 212. Minnetonka was also allowed to demand the removal of pre-existing billboards but this was due to the type of lease that Naegele utilized. The Court seemed to say that depending on the terms of the lease or agreement with the owner of the property on which the billboard was located, the City may have to proceed by eminent domain against existing billboards. The third and most recent case is City of Cottage Grove v. Ott, 395 N.w.2d 111, (Minn. App. 1986). Cottage Grove passed an ordinance prohibiting placement of all off -premises advertising signs and defined them as follows: "A free-standing sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service or entertainment not exclusively related to the premises where such a sign is located or to which it is affixed." This definition is very similar to Eagan's ordinance definition of "advertising signs". (Section 4.20(c)(2)). Cottage Grove did continue to allow on -premises signs. The Court of Appeals ruled that the City may prohibit commercial speech expressed on billboards based upon its interest in traffic safety and aesthetics and that Cottage Grove's ordinance was a permissible regulation of commercial speech and did not reach protected non-commercial speech. 0. at 114, 115. In discussing the constitutionality of the Cottage Grove ordinance, the Appeals Court cited the controlling case regarding the regulation of commercial speech expressed through or in the nature of billboards as Metromedia. Inc. v. City of San Diego, 453 U.S. 490, 101 S. Ct. 2882 (1981). In Metromedia, the San Diego ordinance prohibited off -premises signs containing commercial messages while allowing on -premises signs. The Court found such regulation permissible and stated "If the City has a sufficient basis for believing that billboards are traffic hazards and are unattractive, then obviously the most direct and perhaps the only effective approach to solving the problems they create is to prohibit them." Metromedia at 508, 101 S. Ct. at 2893. It should be noted that the Eagan City Code classifies advertising signs as a conditional use. Courts have found that where erection of a billboard requires obtaining a permit as a conditional use, the grant or denial of the permit may not be based upon a subjective evaluation that the sign would be aestheticly objectionable but must instead be grounded upon compliance or non-compliance with objective starrdards enumerated in the zoning ordinance. Mcouillin Mun, COLD., Section 24.382, (3rd Ed.). JPE/djk V (O Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting PARR CENTER ADDITION C. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Park Center Addition/ Federal Land Company, Changing the Land Designation for D -III to CPD, a Rezoning from AG to a PD District and a Preliminary Plat Consisting of 6 Lots and a Conditional Use Permit for Pylon Signs --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their meeting held on November 22, 1988 to consider a comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III of approximately 21.3 acres to CPD, rezoning from AG to PD, a preliminary plat of 6 lots and a conditional use permit for pylon signs located along the north side of Cliff Road. The APC considered the applications as submitted by Federal Land Company and recommended a denial of the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning as stated. There was no action by the APC relative to the preliminary plat or conditional use permits. The City Council at its December 20, 1988 meeting, continued this item until the February 7 meeting allowing staff an opportunity to perform a more in depth transportation study with its consulting transportation engineer, SEH, and representatives of the Dakota County Highway Department. For a copy of the transportation analysis, refer to a memo prepared ky the Director of Public Works enclosed on pages�" through _J00. At the February 7 City Council meeting this item was presented by the developer, however, at the recommendation of the City staff this item was continued to allow further review of the proposed plat. The City has identified the western portion of this property as its first choice for a future senior housing project. The Director of Community Development has further addressed the issue and for his remarks, refer to pages _LQL\_ through �Z For a copy of the original staff report on Park Center Addition, refer to pages through I �3 At the December 1, 1988 APRC meeting a recommendation was made regarding the Park Center Addition. For a copy of that report and commission action, refer to pages j3� through 3L. There are five (5) recommendations listed under commission action as a part of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission report. For Council information, item one which had three alternatives is the recommendation of the commission that the elderly housing proposal is the most preferred use of the land in terms of compatibility with the existing Rahn Park. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting Also enclosed on pagesd through 1411 is a memorandum from Westwood Professional Se ices that attempts to clarify several issues that were discussed by the APC at their public hearing on November 22. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITER: To approve or deny 1) a comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III to CPD, 2) rezoning from AG to Planned Development, 3) preliminary plat and 4) condi- tional use permit for pylon signs. E MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 SUBJECT: PARK CENTER ADDITION, PRELIMINARY PLAT CONCERNS REGARDING CLIFF ROAD UPGRADE REQUIREMENTS At the February 7 Council meeting, consideration of the above - referenced preliminary plat was continued until March 7 to allow additional review pertaining to transportation impacts associated with this development as it relates to Cliff Road. Also at that meeting, the Council approved the access study report performed by our consulting traffic engineer (SEH). Attached to this memo is a copy of the letter forwarding this report to the County requesting similar adoption as well as consideration of accelerating the anticipated upgrading of Cliff Road into the current 5 -year CIP. Recent discussions with the County indicate that this issue will be reviewed by their Plat Commission on March 13 along with any revised preliminary plat for Park Center. Preliminary discussions with the County Highway staff indicate that if the development is to occur in accordance with an approved preliminary plat which requires a major full access on the western end opposite the Driver's Training Facility, the developer would have to assume responsibility of all modifications to Cliff Road necessary to accommodate this access. These may incorporate appropriate left-turn/bypass lanes, signalization, etc., similar to the intersection upgrade of Cliff Lake Drive. It has been explained to the developer that the City and County would be reluctant to provide any financial participation for any temporary modifications to Cliff Road necessary to accommodate this full access with a proposal to pursue the ultimate upgrading of Cliff Road in the foreseeable future. We will continue to aggressively pursue a process necessary to expedite the major Cliff Road improvement. If you need additional information, please let me know. Respectively submitted, omas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Attachment cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Jim Sturm, City Planner Dale Runkle, Director of Community Development Glenn VanWormer, Consulting Traffic Engineer (SEH) u \ r*7� 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD, P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454 -SM February 21, 1989 McRt MDp 140M OS ELAN DMD K. G SEMSON PAMRA MCCREA N EGDDREwACHMI HgMAS H3*ES MR DAVE EVERDS RIVE E VAN OVBIIIEEKE APPLE VALLEY COMMONS CRY 0"k 7300 W 147TH ST SUITE 402 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124 Re: CSAH 32 (Cliff Road) Access Study - Scheduling of Roadway Improvements (5 Yr. CIP) Dear Dave: Recently, the County and City jointly participated in an access study to be performed for that section of Cliff Road from I -35E to TH 77 (Cedar Freeway). The information from that report was presented to our City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting of February 7, 1989, in consideration of the proposed Park Center development located on the north side of Cliff Road west of Cliff Lake Drive (opposite of Western County Court Facilities). This access study was unanimously endorsed by the City Council and is being forwarded to your attention for similar review and adoption by Dakota County so that it can be referred to by all development applications along this segment. In addition, while this segment of Cliff Road has always been recognized for its potential future roadway improvement requirements, it has not officially been included in the County's 5 -year Capital Improvement Program (CIP). With the inquiries and applications that the City is presently receiving, it is anticipated that the related traffic projections included in the most recently completed Comprehensive Traffic Forecasting Plan for Dakota County and the City of Eagan indicate that this segment of Cliff Road will have to be upgraded in the next 1-3 years. Preliminary discussions indicate a potential for three lanes in each direction with proper channelization and signalization at major intersections in accordance with the previously referenced access study report. THE LONE OAK TREE --- THE SYMWX OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR OOMWMITV "a MEMO TO: DALE C RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1989 SUBJECT: PARK CENTER PRELIMINARY PLAT AMENDMENT TO STAFF REPORT (NOVEMBER 15, 1988) RESULTS OF ACCESS/TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION At the November Planning Commission meeting, the above -referenced proposed preliminary plat was considered based on information submitted and a staff report prepared evaluating the proposal. Subsequent to that application being considered by the Council, additional information was also requested pertaining to a study for driveway/street access onto Cliff Road and the traffic impact of this development on the Cliff Road corridor. Each of these issues is addressed in this memo as follows: STAFF REPORT AMENDMENT As a part of the Engineering Division's review of this proposal, a detailed analysis was done on the water quality and quantity runoff from this development. While the original submittals indicated that approximately 3.5 acres of the northeast corner of the proposed Park Center Addition would be directly tributary to Pond AP -25 within the Cliff Lake Center Addition, staff indicated that there was additional capacity available to accommodate more direct surface runoff. Subsequently, continued analysis of this situation indicates that it would be better to have the majority of the Park Center development discharge its surface water runoff into Pond AP -50 located adjacent to the west boundary of the Park Center development. Approximately 3.5 acres of direct surface runoff from Park Center could still discharge into the Cliff Lake Galleria pond (AP -25) but it should be minimized as much as practical. Therefore, this memo constitutes an amendment to the previous staff's report for consideration of this application. CLIFF ROAD ACCESS/TRAFFIC IMPACT EVALUATION During the review of the preliminary plat by the Dakota County Plat Commission, concerns were expressed regarding the proposed full access on the west end and the limited right -turn only access approximately mid -point for this development. They had recommended that an access study be performed for Cliff Road between I -35E and the Cedar Freeway. This study was completed by the City and County's joint traffic consultant, Glenn Van Wormer. An executive summary of that study and the analysis is attached to this memo. Also, the traffic engineer's review of the original application material creates some concerns regarding the traffic generation c;;[y DALE C RUNKLE PAGE 2 from this site. These traffic volume concerns were a result of confusion over the size of the retail facility. After receiving the corrected information regarding the proper size of the development, those original concerns have been alleviated. In summary, the proposed development will not generate any traffic problems that cannot be handled by the proposed accesses to Cliff Road or Cliff Lake Drive subject to the anticipated upgrading of Cliff Road from 35-E to the Cedar Freeway. It is anticipated that Cliff Road will probably be upgraded to a 6 -lane roadway with channelization and signalization at critical intersections in the future. The timing will be depended upon the proposed development schedule of Park Cliff and other properties within the travel shed. The best projections indicate that the need for this Cliff Road improvement would be within the next 2-4 years. With the proposed full access and limited right-in/right-out from Park Center, certain concerns are raised regarding the ability to handle the anticipated turning movements from Cliff Road to the full access interchange at the westerly end of the Park Center development as well as ensuring that the limited access is restricted to right turns only. This may necessitate the upgrading of Cliff Road prior to allowing the connection of these proposed accesses. INTERNAL CIRCULATION The traffic consultant and myself have had several meetings with the developer's traffic engineer regarding the internal circulation and site plan layout. Because the proposed users have not been selected yet, the detailed design of the site plan and related circulation cannot be refined to a level of detail necessary to address all concerns. Therefore, it is more appropriate at this time to evaluate the impact of the overall development and ability of the adjacent transportation system to handle the proposed traffic volumes and to leave the internal circulation and site plan review as a part of the building permit process. As a whole, the concept layout is workable subject to minor modifications that can be addressed with the site plan review during the building permit process. SUMMARY In summary, Condition #13 of the previous staff report should be revised to reflect the potential change based on the final grading and drainage plan for this development. The revision proposed is as follows: DALE C RUNKLE PAGE 3 This development is required to provide approximately 4-6 acre feet of wet pond storage volume below the proposed normal water level for Pond AP -50. This development shall comply with all requirements of the County Highway Department pertaining to the proposed accesses to Cliff Road. If any additional information or further clarification regarding these issues would be helpful, please let me know. n 11�{{K�//�� irector of Public Works TAC/ jj cc: Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer Attachment EXECUTIVE 'SUMMARY CLIFF ROAD ACCESS STUDY JANUARY 12, 1989 Prepared) for-' City of; Eagan 0 SHORT=ELIIOTT-HENDRICICSUN; INC- Executive Summary Background Information Cliff Road currently carries a relatively high volume of traffic which is anticipated to increase rapidly with the proposed development now taking place. Currently a raised median is in place between Nicola Road and Cliff Drive. A second median is in place from I 35E to the west terminating east of Rahn Road. A painted left turn lane exists in both directions at Rahn Road. Access from the north is limited to Cliff Drive, Scott Trail, and two proposed entrances from the proposed Park Center. These entrances have not yet been approved by Dakota County. Several access points exist on the south side. A joint driveway to the Flour Bin Restaurant and Rocky Rococo operates as a right turn only driveway near Nicola Road. A radio station driveway exists just east of the end of the median near Cliff Drive. The driver testing range has full access at its driveway. There is also a driveway to the Auto Mall between Rahn Road and I 35E. This is "restricted" to right turns in and right turns out although outbound left turn violations are noticeable. The County guidelines for spacing of access locations and median openings indicate the potential for one median opening between Rahn Road and Nicola Road. Any change would require a variance. Operational Analysis As part of the study, development along Cliff Road was reviewed and traffic generation for each business was determined. The traffic anticipated was then placed onto the street system and turning movements constructed at each of the access points onto Cliff Road. As an example, there are approximately 95 eastbound left turns to Cliff Drive and 75 left turns out of Cliff Drive in the evening peak hour. This was done for existing buildings and for the proposed Park Center development. //I Once the volumes and distributions were complete, three different concepts were studied in detail and other concepts were reviewed in less detail. The three major concepts considered were a single median opening and full access at Scott Trail, a full access at the proposed Park Center west driveway and full accesses at both the Park Center proposed west entrance and Cliff Drive. For each option studied, the impact of diverting traffic onto adjacent intersections was considered along with the inconvenience to individual motorists. If a single access point is provided at Scott Trail, all traffic associated with eastbound Cliff Road and the proposed Park Center would be forced to utilize the Rahn Road intersection and the access from Park Center onto Cliff Lake Drive. The volumes are heavy enough to create operational problems on Cliff Lake Drive in terms of northbound left turn lane storage and may result in outbound Park Center traffic delays. The concept would also force the Cliff Drive traffic to utilize one of three routes to access eastbound Cliff Road: 1) Cliff Drive to Nicola Road, 2) cut thru the shopping center and access Nicola Drive next to the Tom Thumb store, or 3) make a right turn from Cliff Drive to Cliff Road and a u -turn at Nicola Road. While diverting traffic (option 1) from Cliff Drive to Nicola Road will operate satisfactorily, we believe the other two options would be more heavily utilized and thus could create congestion on Nicola Road at the Tom Thumb entrance or operational problems within the two shopping areas. Placing a single median opening at the proposed Park Center entrance would create similar operating problems for the Cliff Lake Drive traffic. The only change is that Scott Trail traffic would now likely cut thru the shopping center west of Scott Trail to reach Cliff Drive and access to Nicola Road. U-turns at Nicola Road would probably be increased. Traffic on Scott Trail thru the residential area to the north would also increase. The concept of a double median opening with one median opening at Cliff Drive and the second at the proposed Park Center entrance would alleviate many of the operational problems. The traffic primarily effected would be that on Scott Trail. Commercial traffic may be rerouted to the north thru the residential area or may cut thru a shopping center to the west or make a u -turn at the Cliff Drive median opening. With the close proximity of the median opening, tine anticipated much of the traffic would divert to either u -turns or cutting thru the adjacent center. However, residential traffic originating in the north Scott Trail area would probably use the alternate route to Nicole Road reducing the traffic volume on Scott Trail at Cliff Road. Access from properties to the south would be better served by the two median openings. The access to the radio station could continue as is because of the small volume or could be relocated to line up with Cliff Drive if the property owners wish to do this. It would be desirable to relocate because of the potential for westbound traffic to attempt to make an illegal left turn into the radio station driveway by traveling a short distance the wrong way. Implementation Implementation of the proposed recommendation is dependent upon approval from the City of Eagan and Dakota County. Extension of the median from the end of the current median near 35E to Rahn Road is desirable to provide better direction to motorists at Rahn Road and to prevent illegal left turns from the existing Auto Mall driveway. The development of the Park Center proposal would also make it desirable to extend the median along the Park Center frontage past the easterly driveway to Cliff Road, if the driveway is approved. Left turn lane development at the proposed Park Center would also be desirable and installation of a median would define the area. Full medians should be in place prior to any development on the south side. It therefore appears desirable to install medians concurrently with the development of the proposed Park Center site. The median extension west from I 35E to Rahn Road can be constructed earlier as part of the widening and channelization on Rahn Road south of Cliff Road in conjunction with the Rahn -Cliff development. Ultimately Cliff Road will need to be widened to three lanes in each direction. A design decision should be made relative to timing of the major improvement and installation of the turn lanes. It may be desirable to attempt to install permanent center turn lanes and medians with ultimate widening on the outside. However this may be a difficult design depending upon existing road surface and base considerations and drainage considerations. The ultimate widening of Cliff Road is also very dependent upon widening of the bridge at 135E and the potential need for widening the bridges over Cedar Avenue. It is recommended that the City adopt the concept of a raised median between Cedar Avenue and I 35E with openings at Nicola Road, Cliff Drive, the westerly proposed Park Center driveway and Rahn Road. This concept can be submitted to Dakota County and if they concur, implementation details can be further considered. 7 r T =S EN ENGINEERS ■ APCNItECFS /PLANNERS UA C Cgkf - N5 LEGEND MEDIAN OPENING LOCATION - ,OAD ACCESS STUDY 88077 MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADRMSTRATOR ROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY �✓ DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1989 RE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 CITY COUNCIL PACKET INFORMATION ITEM E - COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT - PARK CENTER Staff has been working with the Dakota County Housing Authority regarding preparation of a site layout. On the seven acres, we are showing approximately an 80 -unit three story apartment with underground parking for 40 vehicles. There is some room for expansion if the additional one acre parcel to the east is purchased. The question arises as to the setback required from the retail to the residential. It would be staff's suggestion that the retail building setback be moved further east if the City acquires this additional one acre parcel. City staff has met with Mr. Erkkila of Westwood Planning to review tree surveys and revised landscape plans. The tree survey included all trees over 6" in size and some revised plans have been drawn to save as many trees as possible. This is a detailed item and if, in fact, the Council elects to rezone the property, this detail can then be worked out as to the best site plan which will mitigate the grading and impacts on park property to the north. In reviewing the timing for acquisition of property for the HRA, I have contacted Mr. Mark Ulfers. The time frame to acquire the property is as follows: The City received the funds to acquire a senior housing site in April 1988. It is my understanding the City has through April 1990 to acquire this elderly senior site, leaving a little over a year before funds would be forfeited or problems arise with acquisition of this site. From time of acquisition, the City then has approximately two years before construction or housing should begin. This step of the process has not even been thought of as to the type of construction that will occur; this will begin upon site acquisition. Hopefully, this updates you on the timing and scheduling for the Park Center senior site. Enclosed is a schematic indicating how a building could fit on this site, knowing we have capabilities of placing an 80 -unit facility on this site with possible expansion if the City elects to acquire or meet with the senior housing committee, or City Council committee, to begin the site design process. If you desire additional information, please feel free to contact me. DCR/js l�� N U CAM CETAIL - Ul'li Ut hAIfAN SUBJECTS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, RE- ZONING, PRELIMINARY PLAT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PARK CENTER ADDITION) APPLICANTs FEDERAL LAND COMPANY LOCATION: SE 1/4 SECTION 30 EXISTING ZONINGS AG (AGRICULTURAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS NOVEMBER 22, 1988 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 15, 1988 REPORTED BY: PLANNING 6 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted to the City for the Park Center Addition, an office/retail complex consisting of approximately 175,000 square feet. The first application is a request to rezone 21.25 acres of AG (Agricultural) land to a Planned Development district. The second application is for a Preliminary Plat consisting of six lots to be developed in one phase. The Conditional Use Permit application is for pylon signage only. The Comprehensive Guide Plan designates this area D -III, Mixed Residential (6-12 units/acre); therefore, an Amendment will be necessary. This proposal is located north of Cliff Road and west of Cliff Lake Drive. PROJECT SCOPE: The northwest 6-10 acres of this site is currently being appraised by the Dakota County HRA for an elderly housing project. With that in mind, the applicant has placed office buildings and a clinic in that area. If this site is chosen and developed for the elderly housing complex, only that portion of the project would change. The elderly housing would probably initially begin with 60 units and increase to potentially 120 units. The following is a detailed breakdown of each lot. Specific users have not been identified at this time: Lot 1 .99 acres 4,500 sq.ft. Class 1 (sit down) restaurant Lot 2 9.8 acres 133,000 sq. ft. retail strip center Lot 3 1.1 acres 6,500 sq. ft. clinic Lot 4 .95 acres 6,000 sq. ft. retail bldg. Lot 5 .93 acres 4,800 sq. ft. bank Lot 6 7.5 acres 2 - two story 18,000 sq. ft. office bldgs (36,000 sq. ft.), a portion of a City storm pond. 44 ZONING & LAND USE: Currently, this site consists primarily of open grassland, generally falling to the northwest. Mature oaks are found along the northern property line and near the pond on the western portion of the site. If the proposed grading on the north side of the pond was changed and some retaining walls were used, some of -these oaks could be saved. They would be a nice amenity for either the office buildings or an elderly housing area. Site sensitive grading along the northern property line is necessary in order to preserve the landscape buffer to Rahn Park abutting to the north. Other adjacent uses are ,two office buildings and three single family homes to the west, Cliff Lake Center to the east, the Dakota County Court Facility, and Drivers Testing Facility on the south. SITE PLAN/CODE CONFORMANCE: Two major access points serve this site - one that was constructed with the Cliff Lake Road improvements and the other opposite the entrance to the Drivers Training Facility. A third right in/right out near the center of the site is proposed. The loop from the access on the west to the right in/richt out would be a dedicated City street serving the office/elderly areas and three other lots. Six hundred sixty four parking stalls are shown on the site plan. The office area would require 202 stalls and 69 are shown with a proof of oarXing area for 54 more. The retail strip center shows 443 stalls and Code requires 698 spaces. The four smaller uses meet their parking requirements. The entire project provides 725 (plus or minus) spaces and Code requires 1,047 (plus or minus) spaces. This is a lot by lot breakdown: LOT STALLS PROVIDED STALLS REQUIRED 1 43 43 2 443 698 3 45 45 4 44 40 5 27 19 6 (office) 123 (including 202 Tn proof area) I'm NOTE: The elderly housing area would require one stall enclosed and one exterior stall for each unit. Since architectural plans have not been submitted, each free standing building should be reviewed by the Advisory Planning Commission and Council before the issuance of building permits. The overall lot coverage is approximately 19%, and 30% would be permitted in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) district on a gross basis. All building and parking setbacks meet Code requirements in this Preliminary Plat proposal. ENVIRONMENTALS/FIRE i POLICE: An EAW (Environmental Assessment Worksheet) will not be necessary and staff is currently in the process of determining if their governmental permits are necessary. The Fire 6 police Departments are aware of these plans and staff has not received any specific comments regarding major unresolved issues. The detailed review would occur with the typical platting and building permit procedures. PARR CONCERNS/SITE AESTHETICS: The parks department has also expressed that the trees by the pond and northern property line are valuable both on and off site. Every attempt to save as many as possible should be demonstrated through careful grading plan preparation and in the field marking. The overall landscaping plan works well conceptually, however more screening of the back of the strip center from the park will be necessary. An overall sign agreement would eliminate any further undue Variances and provide a more uniform development. This has been working well with the Town Centre development. GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The proposed grading plan submitted as a part of this application impacts virtually 95% of the existing topography on this site. When taking into consideration the additional parking areas as identified along the northwesterly property line, the grading virtually impacts 998 of the proposed site. The proposed grading plan shows cut areas of 10' - 12'+/- in the southeasterly area of the site, in the southcentral portion of the site and in the southwesterly portion of this site. Fill areas ranging from 4' - 5'+/- in the center of this site, 14' +/- northerly of the proposed retail center and areas of 20'+/- along the easterly side of the proposed ponding area in the southwest corner of the site are proposed. Along the westerly boundary of the development, the City recently constructed the outlet to Pond AP -50 under Project 452. Pond AP - 50 is a aesignated ponding area in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Stora Sewer Plan. The grading plan proposes to add additional material on top of the existing 15" outlet to Pond AP - 50. The existing outlet pipe is not of sufficient strength class to handle the additional fill which the development proposes to deposit on top of it. .he details of the proposed storm sewer system within the parking lot areas and the street were not reviewed at this time but generally appears adequate. The general drainage areas as designated to Pond AP -50 and Pond AP -25 (ponding area adjacent to Cliff Lake development) are acceptable. Both ponding areas are designated in the City's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan to receive runoff from the proposed development. The grading plan as proposed requires the replacement of approximately 150' of 15" Class 5 RCP with 150' of a 4,000 D Load Class 15" RCP. The development is responsible for the replacement of the existing Class 5 RCP with 4000 D Load Class RCP or modifying the grading plan to provide a maximum of 22' of cover from the invert of the existing RCP to the finished grade for the outlet to Pond AP -50. The main water resource issue for this site is the impact of the development on the downstream water quality. As previously mentioned, 10.15 acres of the site will drain directly to Pond AP -25 and 11.1 acres will drain into the proposed Pond AP -50. Water flowing into Pond AP -50 is then routed to Pond AP -49 (which is in Rahn Park) and from there flows into the outflow from Pond AP -25. The Eagan Park Department has re nested that Pond AP -49 be classified as a Type 3 Wildlife Aesthetic waterbody. Historical data indicates that Pond AP-49,presently meets desired water quality standards for a Type 3 waterbody. Maintaining predevelopment phosphorous runoff to Pond AP -49, therefore, will prevent degradation of the existing water quality in the downstream waterbodies. Development of the Park Center site will increase phosphorous runoff by approximately 42 po ear. The model estimates• that predevelopment phospho ff to Pond AP -49 can be 4r )c„ -n maintained by constructing a wet pond volume of approximately 4 acre feet in Pond AP -50. In addition, phosphorus loadings to Pond AP -49 can be further reduced by designing the ponding areas proposed south of Cliff Road to act as nutrient detention basins also. An incom_olets erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this preliminary plat application. An erosion and sediment control plan, reviewed and approved by City staff, is required before a grading permit is issued or final plat approval addressing the following additional concerns: 1. A temporary berm is recommended behind the retail center to prevent drainage from going over the proposed 2:1 fill slope. 2. The 2:1 slope as proposed is required to be a maximum slope of 3:1 with a 4:1 slope preferred. 3. Tie retaining wall proposed by Pond AP -50 is required to be a: least l' above the 100 year high water level. All slopes are required not to exceed 3:1 around the ponding area. 4. Specifications for seeding and mulching the site should be included in the plan. We recommend that all disturbed areas be seeded and mulched within two weeks after rough grading. 5. Tse site map should identify all ingress and egress points for the site. A rock construction entrance pad will be necessary at ingress and egress points to minimize tracking of mud by vehicles onto the existing paved surfaces. 6. Silt curtains must be properly installed before any land disturbance occurs. 7. The revegetation of all areas disturbed by utility construction must be addressed in the erosion and sediment control plan. S. Maintenance of erosion and sediment control measures should be included in the erosion and sediment control plan. 9. The company/individual responsible for maintaining and removing all erosion and sediment control practices should be included in the plan. 10. storm sewer inlet filters will be needed around the catch basins. 11. All storm sewers outletting into waterbodies should be adequately protected to prevent scouring from occuring at the outlet. 12. Identify on the plan where topsoil will be stockpiled. Stockpile can be strategically stockpiled to prevent sediment from entering wetlands and adjacent property. 13. A site narrative should be IrAgLded on the plan which shows schedule for rough grading, installing utilities, revegetating the site, building construction, curb and gutter, and blacktopping. These schedules impact erosion and sediment control requirements. UTILITIES: Trunk sanitary sewer of sufficient capacity and depth to serve this site is readily available along Cliff Road and Cliff Lake Road. Sanitary sewer lateral extensions and individual service lines are adequately proposed to service the proposed development. The details of the proposed lateral extensions were not reviewed at this time, but generally conform to City standards. slatermain service of sufficient capacity and pressure is readily available from the existing trunk water main in Cliff Road and has been stubbed to the easterly property line of the development as a r.art of the Cliff Lake Centre development. The development is proposing an internal utility system (water and sanitary sewer) which would provide service to all proposed platted oarcels. Details of the proposed internal utility system and how it connects to the existing City system is subject to detail review at the time of the final plat. STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access has been provided to :he site along its easterly boundary with the Cliff Lake Centre development. As far as the proposed accesses to Cliff Road are concerned, the County has taken a stand that they will not approve any access points along Cliff Road until a detailed traffic impact study is done for the entire Cliff Road area. Comments concerning the Cliff Road access points and the proposed internal public street will be deferred until a detailed traffic study is done along Cliff Road. (See attached letter.) Although the site plans are preliminary, the following concerns are identified relating to internal traffic circulation: 1. Driving aisles in the parking areas are required to be a minimum of 24' wide. 2. Entrances from public right-of-way and internal roadways are required to be 30' wide minimum. 3. The clinic parking lot area has no turn around area at its northerly end. 4. Minimum curb radius for the entrances are required to be 25'. 5. Except for the retail center, the other proposed site development areas are unclear as to identifying areas for delivery vehicles and trash pick up circulation. 6. There should be two lanes of approach to the drive-in bank which allows access to the south parking lot and areas for stacking. 7. The office building/clinic and bank/retail entrances should be combined. 3. The additional parking shown north of the retail center will be difficult to build (existing topo is approximately 28' lower than the proposed retail center parking lot grades). 9. A minimum 80' right-of-way is needed for a divided roadway type entrance as proposed. The site plan reviewed by the City's traffic consultant included approximately 46,500 square feet of additional shopping center/retail development more than the 86,600 square feet acknowledged in the applicant's traffic analysis. As a result, the traffic volume forecast provided by the applicant is substantially less than the traffic volume projections identified by the City's traffic consultant. In summary, the major concern with the site is access to Cliff Road. :without the access point/points identified, further comments relating to the site plan configuration of streets and -3a.-king areas and traffic projection revisions are premature. EASEMENTS/PERMITS/RIGHTS-OF-WAY: Sufficient right-of-way for C11;4. Lake Road was provided with the development of the Cliff Lake Centre. The requirements for right-of-way along CLiff Road are subject to requirements as identified in a detailed traffic study for Cliff Road which has been requested by the County. A ponding easement will be required for Pond AP -50 to accommodate storage volume and high water elevations as identified in the City of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. All internal utility easements will be required for sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main facilities servicing multiple properties and those which provide continuity to the City's trunk facility system. The development is required to acquire all regulatory agency permits in the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. PUBLIC STREET/UTILITY FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City special assessment records show the following pending assessments of record. PROJ 4 DESCRIPTION RATE QTY 529 Lateral Benefit Trunk $21.60/ff 640 Water Main 452 Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 705,790 T`%' "^ING ASSESSMENT OF RECORD �0 AMT $13,825 39,52- $53,348 The following financial obligations are identified in accordance with present City policies for the applicant's information and Council consideration: DESCRIPTION RATE Stora Sewer Trunk* $ .027/sf Nater Availability Charge 2,015/ac Lateral Benefit Trunk 21.60/ff Water Main pq'y AMT x49,801 $22,945 19.51 39,313 1,131.34 24,437 Cliff Lake Road (Street) 63.65/ff 668.62 42,558 Cliff Road (Street) 111.70/ff 1,257.72 140,487 Cliff Road (Trailway) 13.00/ff 1,257.72 16,350 TOTAL PROPOSED FINANCIAL OBLIGATION $286,090 * Rate identified is difference between existing zoning rate and proposed zoning rate. All final financial obligations will be calculated based on the Simensions as shown on the final plat and in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. /J1 ) DAKOTA COUNTY SURVEY DEPARTMENT -300 WEST 1471n STREET Thomas Colbert, Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: PARK CENTER Dear Mr. Colbert: GARY H. STEVENSON, R.LS. COUYTV SURVEYOP 1612• .331.1153 APPLE VALLEY. MINNESOTA 551, November 3, 1988 The Dakota County Plat Commission met on October 31, 1988, to consider the preliminary plat of PARK CENTER. Said plat is adiacent to C.S.A.H. NO. 32 and is, therefore, subject to the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance. This development will have significant impacts on C.S.A.H. NO. 32 and the adjacent driveways 'and city streets. This section of C.S.A.H. NO. 32 is not in the 5 year CIP, however, preliminary traffic studies indicate that the road will have to be built in the future as a 6 lane divided highway. County right of way guidelines for a 6 land divided highway require 100 feet of half right of way. The two access drives proposed do not meet the County spacing guidelines for the existing road. The Plat Commission would agree that this site could need access onto C.S.A.H. NO. 32. Due to the frontage length and proximity to existing streets, it may be desirous for access to be provided by development of a city street. For a divided highway, such as should probably be considered by the County and City for this segment, the County Plat Commission would recommend a full access to a public street at 1/4 mile spacing (near the west end of the property) and a right in—right out access to a public street at 1/8 mile spacing. This prospect would have ramifications on'the access allowed at Scott Trail and Cliff Drive. It also seems appropriate to review the existing driveways on the south side of Cliff Road with respect to development of a future public street and the location of median openings. The Plat Commission believes that the City and County at this time should evaluate these issues in conjunction with approval of the proposed development. The Plat Commission proposes to jointly participate in a study of this segment to develop a project to reconstruct this roadway. If recommendation from a study can be approved by both the City and County,. the Plat Commission will recommend approval of a plat consistent with those recommendations. Sincerely yoLu—rs�, Gary H. Stevenson Peter Sorenson Dakota County Surveyor Traffic Engineer Plat Commission Secretary cC`ale Rnnklo- v R1annor Gary J. Erickson, Physical Development Director David Everds, County Engineer Martin Colon .GHS:vf A PARK CENTER ADDITION CONDITIONS 1. These Standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, 32, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, C5, D1, El, F1, G1 2. A planned Development Agreement shall be entered into for a time specified by the City Council. 3. A 9etermination for the elderly housing site shall be made either on this site or on another location. 4. A Pylon Sign agreement shall be entered into. S. Zach_ot shall be reviewed in detail by the APC and City Council before building permits are issued. 5. No :ooftoo mechanical equipment shall be visible from the public streets. 7. Tae :arcing along the east end of the strip center shall be :smovad. 9. Special emphasis will be placed on screening rear side of =;12 strip center from Rahn Part. 9. :r:;33 easements shall be provided for the Parking lot. 10. All 'trash shall be contained within the buildings or in enclosures attached to the building and constructed of the same naterials. Il. 5erming shall be provided along the public streets. 12. ;he development is responsible for the replacement of the existing Class 5 RCP with 4,000 D Load Class RCP or modifying the grading plan to provide a maximum of 22' of cover from the invert of the existing RCP to the finish grade for the outlet to the Pond AP -50. 13. The development is required to provide 4.0 acre feet of wet pond storage volume below the proposed normal water level for Pond AP -50. o+j D 4U �, � ��/C�(�irj44j X71 •Nb \ � (�{Jp 1,7E I"iaP��, ��~ D -III CPDJA-9- 1010appi LB " l��F L ........... Preliminary Plot of PARK CENTER SOCHI U441R1.TIM, AH alt e! the pith 741.41 feel e! the eeet".et !wrtee e! ane tectheeet hares, of Neuer 11. T n," 7'. an'*, it. Dalen :caner, ft "seta. I.a" "rib of the beau% 46.14 feet sh4ffa•. ts.Lr: that bent of the eewheast D,Nrter of ane sa.th4ut r,artar of lactase 14. Toaa.lt 1'. Mn.. 71. Dakota cc.nte. -„ragas. described A. !elle+.: Lbnre.el" at 24. go'.nun Monte at Said Southeast "a9t4r: 0~4 "rah 4 ,-1006 1' rt..tes 71 ,ccn,A Lata. eeaur,ee boar,"• glen. she Sett I,'- -! Said Sbethea,t :.unar. a dntMol of ".ben fent! thenal Lout`. t/ d""as !4 r:n,t,a 49 *are"$ Yet. ear.1111 elan lee SOn, I.no of said /Oitheaal 7esrttf Of the sCOt"ast a d,sS... a Of I).i: feet -e Us .halal point Of "e,nnlna: ge.n.e ear.zhve aaisn ee d"me St rm.te. as seem", ne.t� a glsta•.c. a! :!.]e fast: in#," wrap 1 sear... Ia -mata'. a alterca went, a maatane. if !.4! tett: :ra"f 4ee:4 , dfaref. L! .•el t4 aeC.d, Last. a d,rts.ed m! 1:4.:1 lent: :Y•:* ?art'. :: degrees 7! a,eites 1 seemed Last. a dl.tmM e! :let • he l.tse.eetle: ,lt" . :,.f a..11r. \g[S• ge:rffs !tn,tea Il arenas tial !ler •Ag: •r.: •a: it.... et:tr a,Srass 1''l,a Jte, :, 1*cVt.s ..gS. a g:aga'.g, of !49.91 feel to thl .etmal maInt Of O.a:hrl.e. SAD :n.. - a O! :.it" a. cLlr! L&KI :LT1.L. &.M.d:t. to Me ::r: !:;@ -c a! regard I" i" e!!Ive a! t" :e,nll SOMIdel. :aw:a --.rel. 4:Sr*a.t.. :nn..eitasrl.' of .n. !al!dialed eena¢»g I&",,[:Hann, as a .,.t an ere ben It" e! u.- _ _ m ir:a! E. "in^ 84.44 'M: tera! in. SOYtn WSL Merge t,. 1t.:]beer ..,tar at Metlan 19. ;..hit Il. Una. 71: .neree + ::r. a9 eevren. !a r:niee, " Attend, C.". ase, -:•v tea .n: aM of oetiot / ban Saar' ! !.4"41 : •Inu:o 7: saccmz. 'est. on the lased!:% a.tf",Cr. e! t•.a neon 1!+e a treat :*Carded :r ane. aa. {!:111. a a .... no, O! :7'._ 1 !eat to deo .pearl. final of S, It. of ::,!I Le.* 'bel and teat, tar.."sma. ;:naueaM 975.444 ,.ft. 1:.751,: @oren [.alt+" Semna • A Utae.lual dinner S gMS41m"r laeera YM :Office' :Hien Office 11 *n!, i]721 7.••. 4esn,"tan Dr.,, L.4an, n. !1171 'h8l'LhTIM M t•LAi -MC[L <. s Safe {:5] :Irr.'I. Nle S[T hAte AMR Lha7.Ldr T1Cf4:T y Lot 1. Bleck 1 41.111 4C•ft.+rA"14 be. L.n. 14. Nie. 71: 4e. 11 Int 7. Black 1 424.430 m.ft./9.141/5 at Lee 1. Allen 1 88.111 an.fa./1.11441 me. ' I Lea A. lieu : 711.931 aw.!t. 9.tlp4 re. p.he! .d.!S.:.S1ee. me. :Ba./a6 N•!a./t.7ee8S ie. Lee A. Diego 1 41.181 a.f.ft.I4,e41I/ a'. ' ..... ._... 'a _Mt 1. C.U. 1 4'.481 r,.!t. 1.17916 4e ' �• Vag a:. 14.1v •+!!. :.11"N at. m hada -- ---- ! :ala./ 47!.604 .n.!, 7:•15171 me. 1'.]41 s1•!:.!l.fH/e en. 111."4 a1.4t.14.7291S be. . �..it ! ...a. .. r ul.,..... ♦ rte . 1 /� •......... . • �, • lOFeMA!'E LAID SL'RVEYlN6 e« I NJI M.V81 wee 41 48..ninona a"•'1 \\ ? SHEET I OF 2 SHEETS •« „• NV Jill I� � w f •-.. ��CIQ.1� ��.r�f�� f•0 _•w1�11�� :: •'R•: JOti �f. ]L,..:L_ �� ww„_�wM •� �.•�.«r �.� .r PARK CENTER 1 nN.r .�w Imo•: iw:-.w�.. w.... •M..I-•.• �.-.�� ww. •y N. ,�w •...www , w w f 1! " , i M+ 1�nuiixiai 11 h'III! ill i._i_cail uui:r_ 7/ Y,//,, en ..n iorE PLAN ^ 1 ;'�; _�;,'. j i'� � � � �� -�•• `ii%� �� l�� f��-�• rte.-..� ;,. . � :•� ;art "� �—.� � � i ; \ `` �-�` '/'-•_• i , j / 1 ,�14 1Ile Ire ii i •• �' '• ;\`war /� ,: I } I I I I �� \\ .r `\ISI 1 ; I I I , 1 - r:'«'S .....\ • 1� I •w \�� 1 �, �` (\ I I I 1 L �' ' LII I � :�_.. �Y�n RL•Tr�lr. 'm01 •�� = Pua ��Lb r,•awl..rr nal .� PARK CENTER 7 ~-�" �•— �..ri�"N..� 1•rlwlr�� _ ..r �.�NN...... •w� �.�r r�-rr� N�.�rr w _ _ r.. -w ��'•rw�rr�. auYA UNu w.run 4n•I�M•1 N•. W rlrr. MN. Y• • may± •�• . W N. W W r�•rr. • IY IA• WrwW I. 1.. =w N" W • • • QLZ-•.I �r-4•.Y.«_ V� w .. .. al!a!at C _._. .. _.—.� .. .�., _.- MEET a or a ■Ilcen • • +� • CLIFF ROAD - 1257.72 F Fr it I tl,l� It l I I I' Ilil t• l tltt. aI�ptll:l l I S I jI l to I'll ;I 1 11 �l ili i 0 S . _HAS llq S:Uf'i U65FJ D(IOj s� 1 •� . :JL Ir p : t I Ilk � I � p : t I Ilk r IC}iF pW01, .0 wl a.�w• w .ow m..�� 1! A u =jt 1to idll7 i 1 _ lis l G 1 H ! till 1;; rj) t =W i W t t VJ t•• l'iSf 1' ll4tl to to ci • LL 1 � His s jet' w • �- ^ C!) cr jr=f I!'E =� J �Q m all Q 1 I }_` Ji o J a Q > O Q ir sr ItL W LL I.- 7j J Q • (:�t1 Div I' iil ilii I��I dj1'] 4�•a �T• i1i41\� '\1 �'l� �i.l•'hl':,• $ �A • �jj-.i r '� �� NLN 1i 1 1 I I i 's!f m M i.1LL LL u: z r ui W U m Cvo Pii IL ill m Y {rlj�j O Q sllt°! 1'- �1 1•• ' iicr i}s w w rn ffI O ri iil+ W ii i \A-V ._. 7E' I FLA 96.} �AP-35 �� r 6-s :7C i AP 1: i1_ i.. ;i :'_� >• i I ;jj/rjF10.0 _� ` \•' .�i` L:_ BP- A-� ^y/iii•%;'• 3 !% E2ed X1 PiQ • /i 1 .r. '-AF A"'"22 AF=22'L_,_�Ag -- 87 I 8736 I �9e r . as I9 ZA-ao_ BB2.0.7-903.1-j-' - -!- :; \4 ,r. -7.10.B 0 nMrc AP-261 -'• �i I'+! '. t.Erf eg. .BPV Ix -oma• \ ,> q F:4',I .lo AgPg•23A't:•LAf AP°49 900//1 1-5:— 991.7 `rye \! r i; 'P-4D t 7S E:Q� / 12.91 `. 889.2 8947 l� • --pp ;�?• tir: -25 rrr LL ••:8BB.3 �p P-42 ' BP�`L2•. • Y:.88$. ::•1'; / 9gS.G �� p.a 0. ._8R4i++x /. (-964.0 _ b BP31— � s �T:339.0g - �— AP-1 / �/� i II tZ7.. •'%�1 _ �' `, 912.1 �14 'BP 32, 919.! 93.9 �,,� \ i. C 4 -44 A- f 1 93— � / 7 ' :-SY• � , • Jr1 t4Y .G 918:ST 91 0 s.q �l^ _ L9-t'r!�� e '-7E AP �• AP=16 yrs. 't r.. �; • =920.0:. _ P3.5 is.',•. AP :4 .'r 'N •r_ ^ � V \ ..✓..:926.0- _ AP'IS'• .. :9 4. -i�; LP_A%` _`',_•908.8'-�'i�% �sg�/ 913:D '�'.\ AP-30 t.-913.0.: ==�: 19/4.8 SUBJECT PARCEL FIGO 1 city of eaganSTORM SEWER approved: standard. plate %: PUBLIC JMt-JF WORKS MASTER PLAN DE PARTME l�� SUBJECT PARCEL 4 N FIG#3 city of ea WATER �pfO1°� ciatev: PUBLIC woAKs MASTER PLAN iftoftoib naPA12'Mtc a r4 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE CONSULTANTS 7901 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE SURE 1191 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA 553441 (612)914.7590 November 4. 1988 REFERTOFILE: 85-34-03 N E M 6 R A N D U M t TO: --.Mr. Martin Colon, Federal Land Company FROM: James A. Benshoof�4 RE: „Traffic Study for Proposed Park Center Development PURPOSE The purpose of this memorandum is to document the results of our traffic study for your proposed Park Center development. which 'is located in the northwest corner of Cliff Road and Cliff Lake Road. As requested by City staff# the two prime purposes of this traffic study have been: To develop and present forecasts for the traffic that 'Will be generated by this development ..to assess whether the public roadway system will be 6ble to adequately accommodate the development traffic TRAFFIC FORECASTS The first step in the traffic forecasting process is to quantify the types and amount of land use In the development. As we understand, the prime development component will be a shopping center with about 86.600 sq. ft. The plan also provides five additional development parcels. We understand that prime candidates for four of the parcels are restaurant. retail. bank and clin1C: The plan indicates that the fifth parcel would have an office use, though it is possible that the parcel baby be devel6bed instead with senior housing. The spbcIfIc sizes of developments on these five pared 19 have riot yet been determined. From a traffic forecasting standO9iht. our approach has been to assume that each of thes^6rcels wlil.be developed to about the maximum density allowild under City Code parking provisions. An outcome of . this Assumption is that the sizes of several uses as utill:bd for traffic forecasting purposes are larger than iIIusfr-ated in the development site plan. Spec ifIca11y. for traff(t forecasting purposes. it has been assumed that the develbment will.consist of the following componentsb_ F t' Mr. Martin Colon -2- Skipping Center - 86.600 sq. ft. R69taurant - 4x000 sq. ft. R6ta11 _ 6.000 sq. ft. 8ahk - 4#500 sq: ft.. WICe _ 36.000 bq. ft. CI'.hIc - 7#000 sqo ft. it should be noted that trip generation November 4; 1988 for the overall developrfipnt likely will be lower if senior housing is developer) instead of the office component. The next'`step is to apply appropriate trip generation characttfistics to these development statistics In order to project.;the number of new vehicle trips that the development will add' -to the roadway system. These trip generation projections were developed for the p.m. peak hour* the busiest 'traffic perltod on the adjacent roadways, through the followilig three-step processs 1) Apply expected trip generation ratesl to each development component in order to predict the p.m. Peak hour volumes in and out of each individual Component. 2) Apply a five percent reduction factor to the sum of the values from step 1) in order to estimate the P.M. peak hour volume in and out of the entire development. The reduction factor is to account for tPips between two uses In the development which would Iitbt utilize either Cliff Road or Cliff Lake Road. 3) dategorize the trip generation result from step 2) into pass by trips and new trips. The document thtitled "Trip Generation." published by the ITistltute of Transportation Engineers indicates that if major phenomenon of new shopping centers is that a 31gM ficent portion of their traffic is pose by %flps, trips that already are on adjacent roadways �hd that will be intercepted to include a stop at the 666 shopping center. based on the size of this �opping centers Ftgure V-1 in the "Trip Generati on" "epoet Indicates that at least 40 percent of the Shopping center trips wilt be pass by trips. The �IremaIning 60 percent of -the external shopping center.. I ps bre O*pebted to be hew trips that ate hot;' now .!-. raveling on adjacent -roadways. ThrougFhe above process, the trip generation projections shown 1 ='Table 1 have been developed. A major result;; itt -,.,yam Table 1 i s that, the -ant 1 re Park Center dove 1 opmeht.g (s'. `.+F('h. = ' r.r: .'. Trip d"eratloh hates u Wished In "Trip GeneratTbn," instttute o1` ^^ F^^+neers, 1138 y Mr. Martlh Colon -3- November 4, 1988 14 TABLE I TRIP GENERATION FOR PARK CENTER (P.M. PEAK HOUR) is Rates Trim Use Size (ft.2) �_ ait Shopping tenter 86,600 3.05 3.18 264 275 Restaurant 49000 10.6 9.3 42 37 Retail 6,000 9.2 9.6 55 58 Bank 4,500 13.4 13.9 60. 63 Office 36,000 0.4 1.8 14 65 Clinic - 7.000 1.0 2.6 _7 _1B Totals-z` 144,100 442 516 5% fht.ernal trip reduction -22 --6 Totfi1 net external trips 420 490 'r Pat .1 by Trips (40x) (364 total trips) 168 196 New. `'.Trips (60x) (546 total trips) 252 294 Mr. Martin Colon -4- November 4, 1988 projected trip generation Is 27 percent less than the 750 trips that were assumed to be generated by this property to the C11#f Lake Galleria Traffic Study conducted for the City. The next step Is to project the directional distribution of the devOlopment trips. The trip distribution percentages presented In the Cliff Lake Galleria Traffic Study were utilized'as an initial source of distribution for new trips generat0d by this development. Those trip distribution percentAges were adjusted slightly to account for the expectations that this development, due to more local claracter, will attract a greater portion of trips from the west and., north. The resultant expected distribution of DRA trips to/from this development is as follows: to/from north on Cliff Lake Road - 25% to/ from east on Cliff Road - 50% to/from west on Cliff Road - 25% The past by trips are expected to have a different directiohal distribution pattern. Based on the relationship of the d6veIopment to major traffic streams, the estimated distributions of pass by trips is as follows: from east on Cliff Rd. to west on Cilff Rd. - 30% from west on Cliff Rd. to north on C11ff Lake Rd. - 20% from north on Cliff Lake Rd. to west on Cliff Rd. - 207E froth west on Cliff Rd. to east on Cliff Rd. - 15% from north on Cliff Lake Rd. to east on Cliff Rd. - 15% The next/ step is to apply the preceding trip generation results bnd trip distribution percentages for.new and pass by trip$': in conjunction with expected usage by driveway, to develop p.m. peak hour development traffic forecasts. The resultaht forecasts are presented In Figure 1: As.indlcated in Figute i, pass by trips actually have the effect of reducfnd'particular through volumes. is IMPLICAtIONS OF DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC ON ROADWAY SYSTEM Relating to the p.m. peak hour volume projections shown in Figure ii the implications of development traffic at key locatipl will be discussed next. . i. ersectlon of site access drive and Cliff Lake Road. The design plans for Cliff Lake Road accounted for "C11ffN:Lake Galleria Traffic Study," prepared for City.of Eagan bj�� Short-Elliott-Hendrlckson, Inc., October 1987: page 16 / i IIi1 Y i.1 •� l► izs �.+ t-138'1 L 13 x-20 --zl X113 116 6� -53 Cliff Road J' Drivers` License Exam Facility'. Notes Reductlons In certain through volumes are due to pass by N (intercepted) trips Not to Scale `' F IGIRE ,1 ' TRAFFIC STUDY FEDERAL LAND_tOMPANY FOR P.M. PEAK HOUR :�- PARK CENTER DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT TRIPS BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. MANSPOATATION AND LAND USI CONSULTANTS ' �3 � Mr. Martin Colon -6- November 4. 1988 this intersection. With two lanes for exiting traffic and a left turn lane for entering traffic. this intersection will effectively accommodate the development traffic. incerseccion et L�Iff Rew[7 wnri ri.cc aka Read As noted in the "Cliff Lake Galleria Traffic Study." this Intersection will experience a substantial traffic Increase. To accommodate this growth. a major upgrading. Project was undertaken, including widening and traffic signal control. Since the net new trips generated by the proposed development are lower than the site volumes assumed in the "Cliff Lake Gal lerla Traffic Study." the proposed Park Center development will have less effect on traffic operations at this Intersection. ine proposed site plan Indicates that the development would have two access points on Cliff Road - full access at a location opposite from the Driver's License Exam Facility (abbut*1150 feet west of Cliff Lake Road) - right turn in and out only access located about 410 feet east of the full access point Given the close relationship of the above access Points to the County's spacing standards and given the advantages of having a full access point also available to serve the Driver's License Exam Facility. the County Plat Commission recently approved these two Proposed access points on Cliff Road. The Plat Commission expressed concern about the existing four lane undivided design of Cliff Road along the frontage of this development. in this contextt they mentioned two further points: - that a need exists to upgrade this segment of Cliff Road to an ultimate six lane divided design. The segment that presently does not have a raised median Is only about 1/2 mile 1n length (from about 600 feet east of Nicols Rd. to 600 feet east of Cliff Lake Road). - That an access permit for the right turn in and out access point will not be Issued until a median is constructed on Cliff Road. We concur that upgrading of this segment of Cliff Road. Including a raised median, is needed to resolve the existing 1/2 mile gap In the divided design. Such upgrading should Include left turn lanes at the Proposed full access point. in conjunction with the Park Center development it is expected that traffic signal control will be warranted at the full access Mr. Martin Colon -7- November 4. 1988 point. With this design and traffic control. it Is expected that Cliff Road will be able to accommodate the development traffic without significant adverse effects. An impoftant point regarding the upgrading of Cliff Road is to coordinate. as best possible. the schedule for this upgradifig together with the schedule for completion of the develop lent. To this ends we recommend that Federal Land Company.` undertake a Joint effort with the County and City to implement the needed improvements to Cliff Road by 1990. County_ttaff have given a preliminary indication that some County fUnds would be available to apply to this improvement proJecti t, � 3� Page 5/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1988 t" S. The access onto Lexington Avenue will be finalized with all concerned parties. The proposed access entrance to be constructed to a width of 30 feet. 6. Ail signage shall conform to Code requirements. 7. The proposed development is subject to additional requirements pertaining to grading, drainage and f ire hydrant coverage. with the final plat phase of development. 8. The finished floor elevation for the worship center shall be at least.984 feet. All Voted in favor. 0011PREEENSIVE GOIDB PLAN AMENDRENT/RS-8ONING/PARLIMINARY PLAT/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - PARE CENTER ADDITION Chaitman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land designation from D -III Miked Residential (21.3 acres approximately) to Commercial Planned Development, a re -zoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development district, a preliminary plat consisting of six lots and a conditional use permit for pylon signs located along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Rahn Road in the southeast quarter of Section 3. Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm informed the Commission that separate 9pplications bad been received by the City for the Park Center Addition, an office/retail complex consisting of approximately 175,000 square feet. Be stated the first application was a request to re -zone 21.25 acres of the Agricultural land to a Planned Development district. -The second application was for a preliminary plat consisting of six lots to be developed in one phase. The conditional use permit was for pylon signage only. He stated it would. be necessary,to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Martin Colon (Federal Land Company) introduced the project to the Commission. Tim brkloff presented an overview of the site plan. He stated the develbper had no problem with staff's recommendations. Be explained; -why the land use would be appropriate due to the surrounding area. Be also explained the landscaping# tbe_parking and the phasl6 of the development. Jim'�$enshoof addressed the transportation elements of the project.''ge explained the traffic study and the access points. He also gavea summary of the meetings with the County. l �� Page 6/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1988 Fran Hagen addressed the utility aspects of the development. He stated there would be no problem in complying with the staff report. Commissionmember Graves questioned when the information would be available from the BRA. Mr. Runkle stated they were waiting for the appraisal and that the information should be available by the end of November. There was discussion regarding the amendment from D -III Mixed Residential to Commercial. Commissionmember Wilkins stated that a precedent had been set and that the City should treat all developet6 equally. Commissionmember Trygg was concerned because there was Single Family areas and a park in the neighborhood. Wilkins stated that there was Commercial or Limited Business all along Cliff. Commissionmember Graves stated that as a result of the study, it appeared that the entire Cliff area might be beat suited for commercial development. There was much discussion between the APC members and the traffic consultant regarding the traffic study. Commissionmember Wilkins asked for a clarification of the phased plans. Mr. Sturm explained the plans. Wilkins asked for the developer's thoughts regarding the phasing. Mr. Colon stated they would prepare the road and the grading and would then develop while working with the County to upgrade Cliff. He stated the development was soft at that point. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the developer regarding excessive commercial development. The developer stated they were consistent with their past statements and he reviewed local development. Chairman Pawlenty stated he felt it was unusual to up -zone property and that he was not against or for the project but felt there was not enough information available at that time to make a decision. The developet stated he felt it was hard to see any consistency with the O'Neil and Peterson pieces. Commissionmember Markley stated he wanted to see if the elderly housing was coming before approval of the project. Chairman Pawlenty questioned if the O'Neil property was up -zoned+ Mr. Runkle stated that the O'Neil property decision was ordered by the Court and that Lexington land was re -zoned. Commissionmember Graves asked if the acreage was sufficient for 120 unit9. The developer stated it would depend on the parking. There was discussion regarding the elderly housing. Commissionmember Graves stated.it was premature to give preliminary plat approval before the senior housing issue was settled. Be also felt the entrance was unsafe. Page 7/ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION November 22, 1988 Commissionmember Graves asked what grading was occurring. The developer stated there was grading for the City storm sewer. Commissionmember Voracek remarked that be did not feel the developeU was sincere in preserving the oak trees. He asked how 'much of the Rahn Park hill would be lost. Mr. Sturm stated the hill was in the parki, The architect stated that individual plans would be submitted at the time of the development and that each site would be evaluated individually. He further stated that the southerly portion of the property would be graded and filled. The developer explained to the Commission where the cuts and the fill would be in phase one. Cominissionmember Voracek was concerned regarding conditions one through three. Mr. Poertach explained how the slopes could be attained and stated he saw no problem in working the matter out. Mr. Voracek asked what impact the conditions would have on the parking stalls. The developer stated the drives had been changed from four to two. Voracek questioned if the Cliff Road right-of-way would affect the parking. Mr. Foertsch stated he was unsure and that the issue had no been explored at that time. Commissionmember Voracek felt there were a number of issues that needed to be resolved before the Commission could act on the matter. Be questioned if the Commission wanted to re -zone from Residential to Commercial and felt it was a policy decision. Be also stated that the elderly housing matter was not before the Commission at that time. Chairman Pawlenty stated he had a concern regarding the re -zoning policy. There was much discussion regarding the change of zoning. Trygg moved, Garry seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and deny a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment changing the land designation from D -III Mixed Residential to Commercial Planned Development, a re -zoning from Agricultural to a Planned Development district, a preliminary plat consisting of six lots and a conditional use permit for pylon signs located along the north side of Cliff Road, west of Rahn Road in the southeast quarter of Section 3 because of traffic issues and re -zoning issues. Voracek, Trygg, Merkley, Graves, Garry and Pawlenty voted in favors Wilkins voted against. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT -CHAPTER 13-ODDRL HOME PERMITS Assistant City Planner Jim Sturm explained the proposed ordinance amendment to the Commission. There was a brief discussion regarding the purpose of the amendment. Commissionmember Voracek questioned if there was a provision for an exception. Mr. Runkle stated iti;was the intent of the amendment to prevent exceptions. Merkley moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve an amendment to Chapter 13 of the Eagan City Code regarding model home permits. All voted in favor. TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN YRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 RE: PARK CENTER ADDITION - FEDERAL LAND COMPANY The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the Park Center Addition at it's December 1, 1988 meeting and recommended the following: That the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission recommend to the Advisory Planning Commission that the Comprehensive Guide Plan not be amended because of the impact on Rahn Park. The motion further stated that the following recommendations be made before approval: 1. The developer provide staff with a tree inventory and revise the grading/layout plan to preserve additional significant vegetation primarily adjacent to Rahn Park. 2. The developer resubmit a landscape plan which increases the density and size of plant material adjacent to Rahn Park providing the required screening/buffering according to the Landscape Policy. 3. A 5 foot wide sidewalk be placed along Cliff Road and the existing sidewalk adjacent to old Rahn Road be extended to the proposed 8 foot trail along Cliff Lake Road. 4. That a catch basin be placed for run-off before entering Rahn Park. 5. That this parcel be subject to a cash parkland dedication. It was further recommended that the details of the run-off issue should be worked out between the engineering department and parks department to insure the least amount of impact on Rahn Park. The curreht request is for rezoning from Agricultural to Planned Development District on 21.25 acres. Also an application is submitted requesting:, the preliminary plat of 6 lots and a Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment: The Commission will need to evaluate the following issues: 1: is the proposed land use change from R -III to Commercial PD Compatible with Rahn Park? 2. Does the proposal make every effort'to preserve the existing significant vegetation? 3. boes the proposal provide adequate screening to provide a teasonable buffer to Rahn Park? 4. What are the pedestrian transportation needs? S. What impact does the additional run-off have on Rahn Park? 6. What is the parkland dedication requirement? ISSUE f1 The Commission is aware that almost any land use adjacent to a park can be compatible, 'however, it is generally recognized that residential development adjacent to.parkland is extremely compatible. Therefore, the parcel's R -III designation would be a well suited neighbor to Rahn Park. The question arises whether R -1I1 is compatible with the other adjacent commercial land uses. An alternative land use approach could include the elderly housing proposal with commercial support facilities (i.e. clinic, retail shops, convenience store) being directly adjacent. This elderly housing alternative would work well with adjacent Rahn Park. The park could be developed to provide recreational opportunities to the adjacent elderly residents. A current proposal includes office, retail, restaurant and clinic. This proposal is similar to the past request in which the Commission was concerned regarding it's compatibility to Rahn Park. ISSUE 12 The developer has not provided a tree inventory. Therefore the tree loss analysis is based on aerial map data. A majority of the site is covered with meadow grass. The only significant vegetation lies along the northerly property line and within a hollow located in the north central area of the parcel. This significant vegetation is primarily oaks within the 12-30' diameter range. The building and access road lie within 3S feet of the southern property tine of Rahn Park. Several large oaks will be lost as a result of the grading of the road and building pad. The development plan indicates that a majority of the trees will be preserved within the hollow. The landscape policy requires buffering adjacent to differing land uses as well as scteening of all utility, service and loading areas. The proposal does include a loading area north of the retail anchor. This loading area is within 60 feet of Rahn Park. Staff has reviewed the landscape plan and found inadequate size and number of trees to provide the screening/buffer required by the landscape policy. /1. l An 8 foot bituminous trail is proposed along the west boulevard of Cliff Lake Road. The road is under construction and the trail will be installed this spring. The Comprehensive Trail Systems Plan identifies a 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along the north side of Cliff Road. Lastly, the sidewalk adjacent to abandoned Rahn Road needs to be tied into the proposed bituminous trail along Cliff Lake Road. ISSUE /5 Engineering Department has required the developer to route all storm water drainage to AP -50 located west of the parcel adjacent to Cliff Road. No storm water will directly be outletted into Rahn Park. ISSUE /6 The parcel will be subject to a cash parkland dedication. FOR COlMISS104 ACTION The Commission may consider the following recommendations: I. The pending proposal best suited and compatible with Rahn Park OR The Guide Plan should not be amended from R -III due to the impact bn Rahn Park OR The Elderly Housing proposal with supportive land use is the best suited and compatible land use to Rahn Park. 2.The developer provide Staff with a tree inventory and revise the grading/layout plan to preserve additional significant ,vegetation. 3. `The proponent resubmit a landscape plan which increases the density and size of plant material adjacent to Rahn Park providing the required screening/buffering according to the Landscape Policy. 4. A 5 foot wide sidewalk be placed along Cliff Road. The existing sidewalk adjacent to 'derelict' Rahn Road be extended to the proposed 8 foot trail along Cliff Lake Road. 5. The parcel be subject to a cash parkland dedication. FPO KECEIVEUCEC 5 08 WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, INC'. MEMORANDUM TO: City Mayor Council Members City Staff PROM: Sim Erkkila DATE: December 1, 1988 RE: Comprehensive Guide plan Amendment and Rezoning for "PAtk Center", Federal Land Company In the staff report dated November 15, 1988 for the November 22. 1988 Public Rearing, a' -detailed review of preliminary plans was provided by city staff. In the Plannifig Commission vote to deny rezoning; the shear volume of issues was noted. To�,tlarify the significance of these issues, the following responses are offered: GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL Relative to Grading/Drainage/Erosion control, two (unnumbered) issues were raised, as were 13 other items noted. Unnumbered: Issue 1 (Damage to a newly installed City story sewer pipe which is intended t6 be the A.P-50 outlet). The Developer has two options available to resolve this potential problem; they include: 1. Revising proposed grades over the pipe to eliminate the possibly of tbllapsing the pipe. 2. Replacement of a section of the pipe by the developer, if no other Alternatives are feasible. Unnumbered Issue 2 (Adding a 4 acre vet pond to AP -50). This suggestion is a good one bot pointed out to the developer prior to this staff report. The developer -As prepared to do this. Responses -.to the 13 numbered issues are provided here: 1. A temporary berm vill be constructed behind the retail center prior to Site grading to prevent drainage from going onto the park property. --this will be reflected in final plans. 2. 'the submitted grading plan was preliminary. The 2:1 slope shown behind the retail center can be revised to a 3:1 slope with one or a tbmbination of the following solutions: Aa A retaining wall $! Reducing the width of the proposed service drive `E: Review and lower the proposed finished floor elevation of the retail center. MS MWI nnok eMolena. MU MM ruK MNWTA /w, NO) 41"M MWWs 0010) „o wAmu SCOUVYm. {T. LOYa VAAL aasawtA i Ain City Mayor; Council Members, and City Staff Park Centers Page 2 3. Any retaining wall needed for pond AP -50 will be installed to be at least V above the 100 -year high water level. Presently and in the final plans. slopes will not exceed 3:1 around the ponding area. d. Specifications for seeding and mulching all disturbed areas will be Included in the final grading/erosion control plan. 5. All ingress and egress points will be identified on the site plan and a rock construction entrance pad will be built for construction vehicles. 6. Silt curtains/fences are shown on the plans and will be properly installed before any land distrubance occurs. 7. Ali areas disturbed by utility construction will be revegetated according to final planting plan and seeding and mulching specifications on final grading/ernston control plan. S. All erosion and aediment control measures will be specified on final gtading/erosion control plan and will be maintained until construction is complete. 9. Responsibility for erosion control maintenance shall be called out on future plans once other issues are resolved. 10. Storm sewer inlet filters will be used around all catch basins. 11. Ail storm sewers outletting into water bodies will be adequately piotected with rip—rap to prevent scouring at the outlet. At this tilde, it is not clear if this is a private developer or municipal responsibility. 1I. The final grading./erosion control plan will identify the area to be abed to stockpile topsoil. 13. A project schedule will be provided with a final grading pian. PArs CONCEkNS/SITE AESTHETICS Additionalfield survey work will identify exact tree locations. After zoning approvala specific building footprints will be resolved and at that iiia*, A specific ttee preservation plan can be developed. Additional planting And screening,ttill also be provided to buffer the retail center to Rahn Fatke SL'1C1AP.Y �j Grading, afility, and patk issues are all Manageable items. Final plans can respond t6'each of the isaues raised in the staff report as 1dentifi*d herein. The planniflg process n•e*ssaty to impliment a project as proposed here will provide eMEugh future city reviews to assure all that these ibsuab it! t*doived. TE:mc / Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989, City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT/OAR CLIFF 3RD ADDITION D. Preliminary Plat for Oak Cliff 3rd Addition/Robert Schlangen, Replat Consisting of Two Lots and One Outlot Located Along the West Side of Slater Road --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their January 26, 1989, meeting to consider an application that was submitted by Robert Schlangen requesting a preliminary plat (replat) of the Oak Cliff 3rd Addition located along the west side of Slater Road and south of Cliff Road. The APC is recommending approval. This item was continued from the February 21 City Council meeting to the March 7 meeting. For information on this item, refer t the staff report, a copy is enclosed on pages through. For a copy of the Director of Publip Works' remarks, refer to the memo enclosed on page(s) /S —' /.57 . For a copy of the APC action, refer to those minutes; a copy is enclosed on pages g through S I The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission at its February 2, 1989, meeting reviewed the proposed development and recommended a cash parkland dedication for the additional square footage added to Lot 1, Block 1, and for the Lot 2, Block 1, Oak Cliff 3rd Addition if the proposal is approved. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the preliminary plat (replat) entitled Oak Cliff 3rd Addition. 2-- F"_V_*_ar6TjFJV SUBJECT: PRSI.ffiIiARY PLAT (REPLAT) OAK CLIFF 3RD, ADDITION APPLICANT: ROBERT 8CBLANGEN LOCA' ION: NW 1/4 SECTION 31 :,.• 1 T3777,1777= .I,li W) l : • 7M, 17yalt- r . :� ►I a. . DATE OF PUBLIC NEARING: JANUARY 26, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: JANUARY 9, 1989 APPLICATION SUNNARY An application has been submitted requesting a Preliminary Plat (Replat) of the Oak Cliff 3rd Addition located along the east side of Slater Road and south of Cliff Road. The 3rd Addition received Final Plat approval in July 1985 and the Amoco station was built immediately afterward. This new proposal plats 8.9 acres into: Lot 1 (1.15 acres) Lot 2 (1.41 acres) Outlot (6.06 acres) Amoco Station Future Development Both Lot 2 and the outlot are toned LB (Limited Business) within the Planned Development. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN In November 1987, a Waiver of Plat was approved that split the 1.76 acres immediately south of the service station and combined it with the gas station. That would have allowed Amoco to expand this parking lot to the south in the future. A condition of the Waiver of Plat Was that no building or parking lot expansion be allowed until future platting occurred. This plat satisfies that requirement. No building expansion is anticipated at this time --only the parking lot expansion anticipated this spring. A landscape plan consistent with current standards should be required with the parking lot expansion plans prior to Final Plat approval. Lot 2 will be marketable as a buildable lot; however, staff recommends site pian approval by the City Council. If any revisions to the Planned Development Agreement or Conditional Uses are necessary, review by the Advisory Planning Commission will be necessary. 10 GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan proposes site grafi ng along the south and east sides of the site. The grading plan proposes filling up to 20 feet to allow for expansion of the existing parking lot. A maximum slope of 3 to 1 shall be maintained and the disturbed areas shall be re -vegetated promptly. Virtually all of Lot 1 is proposed to drain through the parking lot to the southeast to two proposed catch basins. The grading plan shows that the catch basins drain to the south to a landlocked low area along the east side of Lot 2 and the west right-of-way line of Cedar Avenue (T.H. 77). Staff recommends that the proposed storm sewer layout as shown on the grading plan be revised. The two catch basins in the parking lot shall drain to a new catch basin manhole placed in the ditch along the east side of Lot 1. The ditch is in MnDot right-of-way and the flow in the ditch will be 3 cfs during a 5 year rainfall event. A new storm sewer line would be required from the catch basin manhole in the ditch to the south to the landlocked low area. Staff feels that this new layout will resolve the erosion problems that currently exist in this area. Also, MnDot is requiring the developer to revise the storm sewer layout to a layout consistent with the City's request. In fact, MnDot's permit with the developer is contingent on the developer revising the storm sewer layout. Staff recommends that a storm sewer outlet should be provided for the landlocked low area. Besides the drainage from the parking lot on Lot 1, the landlocked low area also receives storm water runoff from the south side of Cliff Road in between Slaters Road and Cedar Avenue, the west side of Cedar Avenue from Cliff Road to the south for 600' and Lot 2. The storm sewer outlet could connect to the City's storm sewer system on Slaters Road which drains westerly to Pond AP -10. UTILITIES: Adequately sized sanitary sewer and water service to serve the proposed development is readily available from the existing utilities in Slaters Road. The existing building on Lot 1 is already served with sanitary sewer and water services. The City's Public Works Department is experiencing maintenance problems with the existing a" sanitary sewer line that serves the Amoco Service Station. The sewer line is frequently plugged -up and the only user on the line at this time is the service station. Staff recommends that the developer should add a sediment trap for the car wash and service station to keep the debris from settling out in the City's sewer line. Also, the developer should routinely clean-out the trap or sump manhole and dispose of the material in a suitable location. According to the City's record plans of the watermain along Slaters Road, the proposed Lot 2 does not have a water service stubbed to the property. Water service is available along the west boulevard of Slaters Road or from a hydrant lead south of Lot 2. , . / k 4 STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: The existing service station on Lot 1 will continue to use the two driveway accesses off Sisters Road. The proposed parking lot expansion will improve the traffic circulation of the service station. Public street access to proposed Lot 2 is readily available from the westerly adjacent Slaters Road. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-0F-KAY/PERMITS: Easements in accordance with the C ty o Eagan's at ar s will be required for all sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water mains. Additional easements are necessary for the existing B" sanitary sewer line running along the west property line of the development. The location of the sewer line should be field verified and then an easement dedicated that is approximately two-times as wide as the sewer line is deep. For instance, if the sewer line is 20' deep, then the width of the easement should be 40'. Adequate right-of-way for Slaters Road has already been dedicated. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency. The proposed grading and storm sewer construction in the T.H. 77 right-of-way will require a MnDot permit. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City records show the property proposed for platting into the Oak Cliff 3rd Addition has fulfilled only a portion of the obligations due for its pro rata share of the City's infrastructure improvement costs. The following obligations are identified in accordance with present City policy: DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Water Availability $2,015/ac 1.41 $2,841 Charge Lateral Benefit Trunk Main $8.50/ff 218.28 $1,855 water Slaters Road $42.15/ff 218.28 $9,201 SUBTOTAL-Lot2, $13,897 Block 1 Ps S DESCRIPTION Nater Availability Charge Lateral Benefit Trunk Nater Main Slaters Road SUBTOTAL -Lots Block 1 �// All final financial with the final dimensions, and the approval. RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT $2,015/ac 1.15 $2,317 $8.50/ff 180 $1,530 $42.15/ff 180 $7,587 $11,434 $25,331 obligations will be calculated in accordance approved site/grading plans, final plat rates in effect at the time of the final plat OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION CONDITIONS 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B21 Cl, C2, C4, D1, El, Fl, and G1. 2. Lot 2 shall be reviewed by City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted for Lot 1 based on current landscape policy requirements prior to the Final Plat submission. 4. The development is required to add a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. 5. The development is required to provide service to each platted parcel. l�� sewer and water STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. H. Easements and Bights-of-Msy 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until one year after the date of installation. t /l STANDARD PAGE TWO OF PLAT APPROVAL S. All internal public and private streets shall be constructed within the required right-of-way in accordance with City design standards. D. Public Improvements 1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. Z. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame required by the affected agency. F. Parks Dedication 1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and approved by Council action. G. Other 1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: LTS#2 STANDARD /� 1988 STREET MAP ZONING MAP PLANNED DEVELOPMENT lq1 SCHOBORG NO SURVEYING INC* .W.1. wait 2" a6M,0. M cissa M-3=1 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR: North Star Engineering That -part of Outlet A, OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Dakota County, Minnesota, lying north of a line which is parallel with and distant 254.50 feet southerly of, as measured at a right angle to, -the north line of said Outlet A, said parallel line being extended easterly to the easterly•line of said Outlet A. '00CGll/f�oT A _ I 404 Ao -vo %O 0 Mooin &V AWAY & Beier am AM Mr. RECEIVrr _ e Moores row am ro""mr. WAAAW MOM - etre ASAWA 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 O I 1 I I 1 1 I NBf •ice' �� 150 ZI i amen cesnn nrr ram alwrer, Itrq. AW salmer am M&AYla or M:d Iamfa p mover Ile►Orlalme w nur, , Y A rsr &A" r 8=ra� M MW� A were DwT- dc/9d7ap. seL 1429 c. 3/ r. 27 P23 C 90 N m t o ` � a a M '00CGll/f�oT A _ I 404 Ao -vo %O 0 Mooin &V AWAY & Beier am AM Mr. RECEIVrr _ e Moores row am ro""mr. WAAAW MOM - etre ASAWA 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 O I 1 I I 1 1 I NBf •ice' �� 150 ZI i amen cesnn nrr ram alwrer, Itrq. AW salmer am M&AYla or M:d Iamfa p mover Ile►Orlalme w nur, , Y A rsr &A" r 8=ra� M MW� A were DwT- dc/9d7ap. seL 1429 c. 3/ r. 27 P23 REPLAT OF OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION DEVELOPER .NNLER AZIER AVENT APPLE GALLEY. AV APPLE VALLEY. ■w sueorAw / o Mt. ROBERT SOAANGEN .y�• OUTLOT A8355 W.103RO / SLOWWORM. MI �35 ,M (8.06 ACRES) / 1 ---- -- EtWiNEEp �o• � � NORTH STAR ENOINEEROM L'OISILUNTS WC =_�+ v.•.. wiSI LANE NORTH 91E to �� / _ —• � PLwaTH. tH. MM sSAst ooe EXISING zatwm L"= OUSNESS so ore• /y.4 �l PROPOSED ZONWD . ■�` / / f r LOT t umm wrsNE� r / anor c OAR ars (R-3) Lm x lM1ED BUSINESS OUnm A umm BUSINESS LOT t to AtSlq LOT T1L t iFi A �t i s Lor x 1.41 ACRES Scam ss. .;� WnoT A LOBO ACRES . (tae At>iEs7 �� •• TOTAL Ag1El1Q eSr ACRES LEGAL oESCRIP WnoT A aR ars sto AmRW AML L'�aA /o� ti \ . meso w .e� �a iw o . 'i .�� • •. I JJ • meio N a a At m.e .�� tea.. �� • Q,� \ Om RAI{ L1II am MO. RECF IVF. -,'3 "r 7 1 r !MR {.11.61 L _ W o • • 1, - 7 •1 •. • 17 O 1• M 1! ' 10 i a �•- . u . t 1■ OY7LOT • • 237 • • ■ sum ��j • 1 2 �• •I I. .IN I• YI .. .NN M. I OAK C I FF z ..1 •e a ''%yam s ••t—1•'kir Ir 7 . •�• �»f• 7 is a. 1;4 � • i ' I r, ,, y1 •.� �/y VIS L f S�a�esas� U��RaE 180 FF WATECL A\IAILAGIL%Ty COAQ6C — 1. IS A( -RF -.5 7LATeQS F^'.CAt7 U_pC-ParnC- �IB.aB F 1SC4 981&•1 • V I CLIFF ROAD 1 .. • rrd • b- 1 Oil—OI a •r �/� V•O 4` I011-00 1 01 Ile t 1 • tl • u 1 OO L • r, O • • • 17 oil M 1• ' • -u 5 t •••r'i •{� OUT OT • 1 Y Y e Y „n YN' ..q n•N w •�• 09K C IFF s sE 0 rlQ { d � � Y• • . s 1 ` Irta•1 a1y b t s • �..�� till( • S� 4• •: I WATEC AQAI�Af31LA CHAe S Tl GE — I . y l aceE mmsssi LATECAL, Intl=1T wATck -Mukj _ 318.ab F'F. .� LATErAL 7SEf.:EFI7 wA'1 tR#T(2UNn. c•c'. F F. IS3 3 PARA P Z} APPLE I' N OAK A5 VALLEY "i ;SUBJECT PARCEL • Sti•. v.� • v ••: FIG # 3 city of eagah WATER approved:plate PUBLIC WORKS MASTER PLAN DE PARTME IST MEMO TO: THOMAS L HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 SUBJECT: OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITION - PRELIMINARY PLAT CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL CONDITIONS (FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS) On February 21, the Council considered the proposed preliminary plat for the above -referenced subdivision. At that time, representatives of the applicant took issue with that part of Condition #1 which required this development to accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staff's report. The staff's report identified previous unassessed overlooked financial obligations for proposed Lot 1 (existing service station) in the amount of $11,434. The developer contends that the requirement for this past unassessed financial obligation was waived through negotiations and discussions with staff as a part of the Waiver of Plat processed in September of '88 pertaining to the 50' strip of land between Lot 1 and Lot 2. Attached to this memo is a copy of a letter dated September 29 supporting the applicant's position of their understanding of Lot 1's exception to these financial obligations. The Public Works Director and Special Financial Consultant (Jerry Wobschall) cannot provide any recollection or substantiation supporting the applicant's position. Therefore, the issue should be discussed on its own merits at the Council meeting with any adjustments being provided by specific Council action. Respectively submitted, C/- /PZ Alv_,7L Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj Attachment cc: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance/City Clerk Jerry Wobschall, Finance Consultant /SS September 29, 1988 Mr. Jerry Wobschall City of Eagan � 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Schlangen Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Schlangen Our File No. 32127 Dear Mr. Wobschall: This letter is a follow up to the telephone conference call among myself, Greg Soule, and you of September 26, 1988. This is in regard to Lot 1, Block 1 of Oak Cliff Third Addition and the adjacent 1.76 acres of outlot A. It is my understanding that the City of Eagan will issue a waiver of plat to allow the recording of that certain Warranty Deed dated October 30, 1987 from Cliff Road Partnership to Robert R. Schlangen for the 1.7 acres of outlot A lying north of a line which is parallel with and distant 254.5 feet southerly of, as measured at a right angle to, the north line of said outlot A, said parallel line being extended easterly to the easterly line of said outlot A. A copy of that Deed is enclosed. Mr. Schlangen will be delivering this letter along with the original Deed to receive the endorsement for the waiver of plat. It is also my understanding that the City of Eagan will allow the replatting of Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff Third Addition which will include the addition of the north 50 feet of said 254.5 feet to the existing service station parcel. �Sb BERNICK AND STERN A PROrESS1ONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW INCLUDING NLNSLRs or TNL roRYLR LM' rIRMs or STERN, LEVINE, LIrSON a STRAUSS. P. A. REAL J. SHAPIRO AND •.LLO .ONT[O IN GLUrO11YY I RAYL A. GLRMIC II • • WO AOYITi[D I. RI[CONA�N SERNICR,B NARRO AND OLA$SMAN, P. A. • ARTA IIR J. OLARRYAN •4L0 C[1I,h[O hINIC ACCOYYTAYf RCOTT A.LIPSON PARROALE 1, SUITE 200 SANUEL L. STAN. JLRRT STRAURS•• 6001 GAMBLE DRIVE RORLRT C. RIP[INS OAYIo L.OLRON MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 65416 I PAUL J. OUAST SUSAN DICALL NINSRLRO (612) 546-1200 RGRLRT O. RARCNAL•• rALSIMILE (612) 346-1007 September 29, 1988 Mr. Jerry Wobschall City of Eagan � 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Schlangen Enterprises, Inc. and Robert Schlangen Our File No. 32127 Dear Mr. Wobschall: This letter is a follow up to the telephone conference call among myself, Greg Soule, and you of September 26, 1988. This is in regard to Lot 1, Block 1 of Oak Cliff Third Addition and the adjacent 1.76 acres of outlot A. It is my understanding that the City of Eagan will issue a waiver of plat to allow the recording of that certain Warranty Deed dated October 30, 1987 from Cliff Road Partnership to Robert R. Schlangen for the 1.7 acres of outlot A lying north of a line which is parallel with and distant 254.5 feet southerly of, as measured at a right angle to, the north line of said outlot A, said parallel line being extended easterly to the easterly line of said outlot A. A copy of that Deed is enclosed. Mr. Schlangen will be delivering this letter along with the original Deed to receive the endorsement for the waiver of plat. It is also my understanding that the City of Eagan will allow the replatting of Lot 1, Block 1, Oak Cliff Third Addition which will include the addition of the north 50 feet of said 254.5 feet to the existing service station parcel. �Sb BERNICK AND STERN A PROrESSIONAL ASSOCIATION Mr. Jerry Wobschall September 29, 1988 Page Two As part of the settlement of the outstanding issues, Mr. Schlangen shall pay the special assessment in the amount of $3;237.75 which represents that portion of the deferred -assess- ment of the 50 feet of the part of outlot A that he is acquiring. The check is accompanying this letter. Finally, inconsideration for all of the above and the service station being exempt for any portion of the deferred assessment, it is my understanding that the balance of the 204.5 feet of outlot A that is being acquired by Mr. Schlangen will be subject to the deferred assessment to be paid when the property is 'either developed by Mr. Schlangen or sold. I want to take this opportunity to thank you and Greg Soule for your patience and cooperation in bringing this matter to a satisfactory conclusion. SAS/ezc cc: Robert Schlangen Gregory D. Soule, Esq. wobschal.ltr Very truly yours, BERNICK AND STERN A Profess' nal Association Saul A. Bernick (5� MINUTES OF A SPECLfi. MEETING OF RAM ADVISORY PLANNING NAIGAN, NIOSSOTA A special meeting of the Sagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Thursday, January 26, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. at the Sagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Graves, Trygg, Merkley, Miller and Gorman. Alternate Member Boeft was present for absent Member Voracek. Also present were Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Assistant City Engineer Mike Poertsch, City Planner Jim Sturm, Community Development Director Dale Runkle and Assistant City Attorney Mike Dougherty. AGENDA The following two items were added to the agenda: (1) Ordinance Amendment - Chapter 13 - Subdivision Platting Requirementst and (2) Ordinance Amendment - Chapter 13 - Public Design of Street and Utility Improvements. Trygg moved, Graves seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. MARDELANM ADDITION - LARASS MABUPACrURING AND EALEB, INC. This item was continued at the applicant's request to a future Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Q1KFi'Ntla Chairman Pawlenty opened the first public hearing regarding a preliminary plat (replat) of Oak Cliff Third Addition consisting of two lots (2.91 acres) and one outlot (6.06 acres) located along the west side of Slater Road south of Cliff Road in the northwest quarter of Section 31. City Planner Jim Sturm introduced the application to the Commission. Be further updated the Commission on the background of the matter. Jim Phillipi (North Star Engineers) was present representing the developer. Be informed the Commission that the applicant objected to the assessments but would try to resolve the matter before appearing before the City Council. Page 2/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION January 26, 1989 Member Merkley had questions regarding the storm sewer revision. The developer stated the pians were in progress and they would be completed after plat approval. Member Graves asked if proposed condition number 5 would cover the water stub. Mr. Sturm stated yes. Member Markley questioned if standard condition number B-4 should be included in the proposed conditions. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch stated yes. Trygg moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and aoc____rode w preliminary plat (replat) of Oak Cliff Third Addition consisting of two lots (2.91 acres) and one outlot (6.06 acres) located along the west side of Slater Road south of Cliff Road in the northwest quarter of Section 31, as submitted by Robert Schlangen, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied withs Al, B1, B2, B4, C1, C2, C4, D1, F.1, F1, and Gl. 2. Lot 2 shall be reviewed by the City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised landscape plan shall be submitted for Lot 1 based on current landscape policy requirements prior to the final plat submission. 4. The development is required to add a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. 5. The development is required to provide sewer and water service to each platted parcel. All voted in favor. BLUE RIDGE SECOND ADDITION - L. A. LB,UL[A DEVZLOPNENT CO. This item was continued to a later time at the meeting to await the arrival of the developer. AUTO= RIDGE ADDITION - JAMES DETELOPNENT CO. Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing regarding a rezoning of 38.6 Agricultural acres to an R-1 (Single Family) district and a preliminary plat consisting of 99 lots located east of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road in the north half of Section 25. IS 1 Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting DECEMBER 31. 1988 (GENERAL FUND BUDGET AWUSTMBNT A. 12/31/88 General Fund Budget Adjustment --Each year the Director of Finance prepares a list of budget adjustments for the preceding year. These budgetary adjustments represent certain expenditures that were allowed in 1988 that exceeded the budgetary guidelines that were established for the calendar year. Budget adjustments are required prior to the preparation and finalization of the Financial Report. For a copy of the memo and list of budget adjustments as prepared by the Director of Finance, refer to pagesY! [ through jfgV. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the fiscal 1988 budget adjustments as prepared and presented for consideration. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 SUBJECT: 1988 GENERAL FUND BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS Prior to closing the final records for 1988, I would like to recommend a number of budget adjustments. The primary purpose of these adjustments is to allow the City to present a more realistic budget versus actual statement in the December 31, 1988, annual financial report. The request City Council action will formalize the adjustments which are primarily the result of previous policy actions or authorizations which are difficult to pin point in the City Council minutes. It is important to not that this action will only change how the 1988 General Fund operations will be reported as the transactions, both revenue and expenditures, have already taken place. In total the General Fund appropriation will increase by $403,220 from $8,652,100 to $9,055,320, and the $16,280 contingency appropriation will be allocated to operating departments. This budget increase is funded by an increase of $105,000 to the total revenue estimate and by $298,220 from the fund balance. I am, therefore, requesting that the follow line items list by department be amended as follows. Since only a minimu number of line items are listed, neither old or new department totals will foot in this presentation. Also, increases or decreases to these specific line items may be more or less than is actually necessary for that particular line item but serves to balance the department in total. Mayor & City Council Insurance $34.280 Dept. Totals $69,760 Administration Dept. Totals $355,420 Data Processing Dept. Totals $189,980 (co I ($12.800) $21.480 ($12,800) $56,960 $355,420 $189,980 Recommended Department Original Recommended Adjustment Revised Line Item Appropriation Increase (Decrease) Appropriation Mayor & City Council Insurance $34.280 Dept. Totals $69,760 Administration Dept. Totals $355,420 Data Processing Dept. Totals $189,980 (co I ($12.800) $21.480 ($12,800) $56,960 $355,420 $189,980 Recommended Department Original Recommended Adjustment Revised Line Item Appropriation Increase (Decrease) Appropriation Finance/City Clerk Office Supplies $21,000 $4,100 $25,100 Office Form 3.000 2.300 5.300 Dept. Totals $549,260 $6,400 $555,660 Leal Prof.Svcs-Legal $185,000 $121,000 Dept. Totals $185,000 $121,000 Community Development Salaries/Wages-Reg. $487,030 ($52.000) Dept.Totals $1,153,400 ($52,000) Cable TV Cable Franchise Fee $79,520$28,000 Dept. Totals $121,580 $28,000 Police Salaries/Wages-Reg. $1.538.830 $42,000 Dept. Totals $2,588,470 $42,000 Fire Fire Relief Pension $91,160 ($38,000) Buildings Repair 20,000 ( 12,000) Insurance 24,320 ( 5,000) Conf.& Schools 9,800 ( 3,200) Mobile Equip.Repair 12,800 ( 7,900) Mobile Equipment 36.180 ( 32.000) Dept. Totals $577,170 ($98,100) Public Works/Engineering Salaries/Wages-Reg. $304,730 $50,000 Prof.Svcs.-Eng. 20.000 80.000 Dept. Totals $512,970 $130,000 $306,000 $306,000 $435,030 $1,101,400 $107.250 $149,580 $1.580.830 $2,630,470 $53,160 8,000 19,320 6,800 4,900 4.180 $479,070 $354,730 100.000 $642,970 Recommended Department Original Recommended Adjustment Revised Line Item Appropriation Increase (Decrease) Appropriation Streets 6 Hiahways Street Repair Supplies $51,000 $22,000 $73,000 Snow Removal/Ice Control 22,000 16,000 38,000 Equipment Rental 3,000 7,000 9,000 Other Contractual Svcs. 2,000 7,000 9,000 Buildings -0- 68.000 68.000 Dept. Totals $846,000 $120,000 $966,000 Central Services - Maintenance Dept. Totals $254,110 $254,110 Parks S Recreation Salaries/Wages-Reg. $479,350 $30,000 $509,350 Field Equip.Repair Parts 1,000 8,000 9,000 Prof.Svcs.-Eng. 4,000 8,000 12,000 Architectural Svcs. -0- 40,000 40,000 Sporting Event Officials 10,000 16,000 26,000 Electricity 12,000 9,000 21,000 Street Repair -0- 21,000 21,000 Other Contractural Svcs. 5.000 3.000 8.000 Dept. Totals $1,158,620 $135,000 $1,293,620 Tree Conservation Dept. Totals $74,080 Continaencv Transfer to Reserves $16,280 ($16.280) Dept. Totals $16,280 ($16,280) General Fund Totals $8,652,100 $582,400 ($179,180) 63 $74,080 $9,055,320 To balance the increased appropriation level of $9,055,320, I am recommending the following increases to revenue estimates: You will note that the actual revenues exceeded the budgeted estimate by approximately $107,000 while actual expenditures exceeded the budgeted appropriation by approximately $390,000. This results in a utilization of fund balance or the reserve of nearly $300,000. On the revenue side, the budgeted to actual is very close for two reasons. Number one is the fact that revenue is being budgeted less conservatively and number two is the fact that the county made the error on the tax levy which has an impact of approximately $200,000. On the expenditure side there are a number of reasons why actual expenditures exceeded revenues to that extent. They relate primarily to the continually increasing size and magnitude of the General Fund operations. I have not done an exhaustive analysis on a department by department basis which would help determine more specifically what the exact causes were. Certain things such as personnel additions, increased legal billings, numerous engineering studies, department locations and the work on the community center come immediately to mind. In certain cases such as in the Streets Division, expenditures were made during 1988 from carried forward 1987 appropriations. I would suggest that at some point in the future we discuss this matter in more detail. Please let me know, if you have any questions. O0 Finance Te ctor/City Clerk EJV/kf Original Revised Account Estimate Adiustment Estimate Sign Permits $9,000 $15,000 $24,000 Project Admin.Reimbursement 200,000 90,000 290,000 Transfer from Reserves -0-298,220 298.220 Revenue Totals $8,652,100 $403,220 $9,055,320 You will note that the actual revenues exceeded the budgeted estimate by approximately $107,000 while actual expenditures exceeded the budgeted appropriation by approximately $390,000. This results in a utilization of fund balance or the reserve of nearly $300,000. On the revenue side, the budgeted to actual is very close for two reasons. Number one is the fact that revenue is being budgeted less conservatively and number two is the fact that the county made the error on the tax levy which has an impact of approximately $200,000. On the expenditure side there are a number of reasons why actual expenditures exceeded revenues to that extent. They relate primarily to the continually increasing size and magnitude of the General Fund operations. I have not done an exhaustive analysis on a department by department basis which would help determine more specifically what the exact causes were. Certain things such as personnel additions, increased legal billings, numerous engineering studies, department locations and the work on the community center come immediately to mind. In certain cases such as in the Streets Division, expenditures were made during 1988 from carried forward 1987 appropriations. I would suggest that at some point in the future we discuss this matter in more detail. Please let me know, if you have any questions. O0 Finance Te ctor/City Clerk EJV/kf Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting VARIANCE/VILLAUME INDUSTRIES/BUILDING FRONT SETBACK B. Variance, Villaume Industries, Inc. for an 181 Variance from the Right of Nay Located on Lot 5 of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 2 (2926 Lone Oak Circle) --An application has been submitted by Villaume Industries, Inc. for a building front variance of an additional 18 feet from the present building. If approved, the proposed addition would be 14 feet from the property line and 22 feet from the curb. The standard setback for buildings in this category is 40 feet. There is no Advisory Planning Commission public hearing required on this item. For additional information on this itemr9fer to the staf report, a copy of which is enclosed on pages through 4Co. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve an additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANTS VILLAUME INDUSTRIES, INC. LOCATION: LOT 5, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION - 2926 LONE OAK CIRCLE EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 7, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 27, 1989 REPORTED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been received requesting a Variance to allow a second floor entrance and exit for the existing offices and operations plant. COMMENTS: Villaume Industries, Inc. is a wood products manufacturer and has been located in Eagan since 1969. They are requesting a front yard Variance ranging from 11'-18' at the nearest point. Currently, the building is approximately 40' from the curb, and approximately 32' from the property line. An additional 18' would allow the building to be 14' from the property line and 22' from the curb. The applicants would like to construct a second entrance in the front of the building to provide an access to the second story. The applicant has not demonstrated a hardship as defined by City Code. However, the request does meet the required findings as set forth in Section 11.40, Subd. 3.B.4 and 3.0 of the City Code. 1989 STREET MAP 1987 ZONING MAP T. promo ' MA C, w, W& - .. IIUIL1�1Jh'�� INL7LK'�fLl�i P❑�xi5%�.Y+� LS�F� 3�cu� Ciuiiai Hc^ W b"PMr7 .... ❑Lf4�L'd %5W P=f~,Pl eN%iH opeol Q a LL F v Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting MODIFICATION TO CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA SIGN AGREEMENT C. Modification to Cliff Lake Galleria Sign Agreement --Enclosed on page ,1JQ you will find a copy of correspondence received of Ryan Construction Company requesting a modification of the Cliff Lake Galleria sign agreement. Under the agreement, the larger pylon sign would be located near the Target entrance while a lower monument sign would have been located adjacent to the tenant shops. It is the intention of this proposal to modify the agreement to allow these two signs to be switched such that the monument sign would be adjacent to Target and the pylon sign would be adjacent % to the tenant shops at the locations indicated on page 1-7( . A graphic depicting the design and relative size of the pylon and monument signs is also included on pagei. This proposal has been reviewed by the City's sign inspector, Donna Rollins, and she indicates nothing which would prohibit consideration of this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a modification of the Cliff Lake Galleria sign agreement to permit the pylon sign and a monument sign to be relocated at Cliff Lake Center as presented. coustructiou company OF MINNEB0T4 1NCOgPOp gTEO February 24, 1989 Mr. Tom Hedges City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, MN 55121 Re: Cliff Lake Retail Centre Eagan, MN Dear Mr. Hedges: In talking with Donna Rollins in your office about the relocation of the new pylon sign at the project site, she asked that I contact you concerning this matter. I would like this item to be placed on the agenda for the March 7 Council Meeting. It is our intention to relocate the new pylon sign to the area near the first entrance to the Centre past the signal lights at Target. We feel that this will be a better location that was approved in August of 1988. The monument sign that is being replaced by the pylon sign will be relocated to where the pylon was originally intented to be placed. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 336-1232. Respectfully RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY games Felton Project Engineer cc: Bill McHale clkms/52/jf/sk 700 INTERNATIONAL CENTRE, 900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 TELEPHONE 612/339-9847 FAX 612/337-5552 k lD UFF IN E TMOET MTLOT A ffWF LME trojec: CIF! I are Centre Extenci, Signage - site pion 0.11 A..v 3 C1111 I%Oma I SOWN Cient Ryan CorlsIn,ction Mo c.,o- 11100 so. I Ym. Mo.. 55401 le ! Project# L3451 ! DDa. Somitt 5 or 5 Mile a R. •-CONSULTANTS71 mmfl�ebw'-M�� - irr 4ffgAGnIn I TLT UJ r Cliff Lake Centre Exterla SID — Ptl� & Mo��1 SO :9 L9.. R' -d a a,, Reed I E.W. Wnnpq� aoa11R11 not S MCMI 1900 tm �.. So. I IN+ida Mnri1R /1'"e7 O..o r.ww+v�w nim ws+we w.�a� -ni't.Y.4Vn!y I .R�•f RojeC1I L3431 Dom 5/12f8nT.i5 M*~mss. emirs �� yr �aq nv aY�es SI •C ORSU L T ANTS -1 RC. QYtlueW I swsm�ew�emm� sf��Y�\•m�wlWlfw• RwgY\ 191 �y+�InfY 9s1 10 S ws Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting • 1• -,I A'1:4 d.1 PiTIFe-ii-sTella I i o, 1:4 D. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment and Rezoning of 1.4 Agricultural Acres to a LB (Limited Business) District on Outlot C of the Preliminary Platted Kingswood 2nd Addition At its February 28, 1989 meeting, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider applications received of James Horne for a comprehensive guide plan amendment to change the land use designation from D -II (Mixed Residential) to LB (Limited Business) and a rezoning for a 1.4 AG (Agricultural) acres to an LB (Limited Business) district on Outlot C of Kingswood 2nd Addition located west of Pilot Knob Road and south of Wescott Road. The APC is recommending denial of these applications. For further information concerning this matter please refer to the staff report which is enclosed on pagesi�i'�/�, Minutes of the action taken at the APC meeting will be distributed on Monday with the Additional Information packet. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 1.4 agricultural acres to a limited business district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminary plat as presented. X73 CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECTS COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN REZONING APPLICANTS JAMES BORNE LOCATION: OUTLOT C, KINGSWOOD 2ND ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 280 1989 DATE OF REPORT: FEBRUARY 22, 1989 REPORTED BY: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY APPLICATION SUMMARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from D -II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units/acre) to LB (Limited Business) and a Rezoning of 1.4 R-1 acres to a Limited Business district located directly west of the Eagan Municipal Center and south of the old City Hall and Fire Administration buildings. On June 21, 1988, the Kingswood 2nd Addition area received a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the use from D -II to D-1 (Single Family, 0-3 units/acre) and a Rezoning of the entire 41.5 acres from AG and R-1 to an R-1 district. The original application requested R-3 Townhouse density on the Outlot to the north around the pond and a (GB) General Business lot (the subject Outlot C). The Advisory Planning Commission recommended denial of those zoning changes due to the General Business request. The R-3 zoning was requested to the north to act as a buffer to a parcel zoned LB within the Blackhawk Park PD. Meritor Development agreed to down -zone that parcel and did so with the Oak Meadow Addition (single family) in Oct./Nov. 1988. A conceptual site plan has been submitted by the applicant. With a building as large as shown and the parking necessary to serve it, virtually the entire site would be graded and nearly all of the trees would be lost. Due to the size of the proposed building, a secondary ingress/egress for circulation and safety purposes is desired. That access would be between the old City Hall and Pilot Knob Road and is not consistent with plans previously reviewed by the Council and Historic Committee for the development of that area. If single family (although requiring existing topography lots are platted, stovepipe shaped lots a Variance) would be more sensitive to the and consistent with surrounding land uses. 44". 14; 40 a VVr!4M;7 t_, m VOW Li 7_4.Lo wam FL.. TW 7L 17 GITY A4 417.F Ilk Jr, L40r ell C7 PP6.6. s V-Ofrm 4 13LV t LL m VOW Li 7_4.Lo wam FL.. TW 7L 17 GITY A4 417.F Jr, L40r C7 PP6.6. s V-Ofrm 4 13LV Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting E. Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Preliminary Plat for Sterns Addition (Independent School District #196)--A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at its February 28, 1989 meeting to consider a comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot located east of Dodd Road, south of Diffley Road. The application from Independent School District #196 is for the construction of an elementary school. The APC is recommending approval. For additional information,_ please refer to the staff report which is enclosed on pages - The APC minutes will be distributed with the Additional Information packet on Monday. The Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending a trail and pedestrian walkway system but has recommended a waiver of the parkland dedication fee as a consequence of the nature of the public facilities use. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located east of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road. CITY OF EAGAN SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMEeIDMENT, REZONING, PRELIKINARY PLAT • (BTERNS ADDITION) APPLICANTS XMZPENDEHT SCHOOL DISTRICT 196 LOCATION: NORTH 1/2 SECTION 25 DATE OF PUBLIC RZARINGs FEBRUARY 280 1989 DATE OF REPORTS FEB$UARY 22, 1969 COMPILED BYs COMMURITr DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMKARY: Separate applications have been submitted requesting a rezoning of 16.46 AG (Agricultural) acres to a PF (Public Facilities) district and a Preliminary Plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located along the east side of Dodd Road just south of Diffley Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The project site is designated in the Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan for D -II (Mixed Residential, 0- 6 units/acre). The proposed elementary school would be consistent with a PF (Public Facility - school) land use designation. As such, the project requires a Comprehensive Plan amendment to change the land use designation from D -II to PF. This amendment should not -adversely impact the surrounding Residentially -designated land since Public Facility uses are generally compatible with Residential uses. EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLANS The site is surrounded by Agricultural and R-1 (Single Family) properties on all sides. The Autumn Ridge subdivision received Preliminary Plat approval on February 21, however the access issue involving all adjacent property owners needs to be finalised before any development can occur. Also at that meeting the school site plan was shown to the Council as all parcels were being reviewed an an overall basis and there was concern expressed that the parking lot/drop off area for the school was such too small for bus movements. The school district architect will review that concern at the February 28 APC meeting and will be able to respond to the building orientation. and the number of parking lot stalls provided. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The referendum was approved in October 1988 and the architects began schematic design in December. The design development began on January 23 after approval by the school board. The district hopes to complete the contract document stage and bidding stage by May 22; actual grading would begin as soon as possible after Preliminary Plat approval. Occupancy is anticipated on June 1, 1990 with the first students .1 that fall. q 1• l'o /TRESTS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public -street access to the proposed sitepresence not available from Dodd Road. The construction of the proposed street lying north and east of the proposed site will serve as its major access to Dodd Road. The design and construction of this proposed street is required to conform to City standards for horizontal and vertical alignment. EASEMENTS/RIGHT-0E-IAY/pERMITSt Slope easements will be required rom the adjacent properties where the proposed grading exceeds the boundaries of the development. The development is required to provide appropriate public utility, street and ponding easements as required by the City. A minimum of 80 feet of public right-of-way will be required for Dodd Road because of the future widening. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the appropriate time frame as required by the affected agencies. FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS: A search of City records show the parcels nc uded for development at this time have no pending assessments of record and the following public infrastructure improvement charges are proposed in accordance with City policy: DESCRIPTION RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT 'Sanitary Sewer Trunk $1,365/ac 10.66 $14,551 Water Trunk $1,380/ac 10.66 $14,711 Water Availability Charge $2,115/ac 16.46 $34,813 Storm Sewer Trunk $.083/sf 716,998 $59,511 Lateral Benefit Trunk Water Main $8.95/ff 494.91 $ 4,429 Dodd Road $38.15/ff 494.91 $18,881 Trailway $8.10/ff 494.91 $ 4,009 TOTAL $150,905 All final financial obligations will be calculated in accordance with the final approved site/grading plans, final plat dimensions, and the rates in effect at the time of the final plat approval. PARRS ISSUES: The elementary school proposal will be waived of parkland dedication. The parks dedication fee would be implemented with a future change in land use. Staff has provided the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission with several Q --a-lternat-i-ves- -for—the-tra4-l-along_ -Street. A.._-_ —_ _ GU= STANDARD COHDITIOM OF PIAT APPROVAL A. Assessments 1. This development shall accept its additional assessment obligations as defined in the staff's report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and ffigbte-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent to private property or,public right-of-way. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee Its proportionate share of the acquisition costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility easements as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to service this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City codes and engineering standards and policies, and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. 4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be included in the Development Contract and not released until_ one_ year after_ the date of _installation. �9 tea` _ v'4 ---l1 Hadm" odw "W I I tomemmm. i� 6D /196 Eh mm" Sdnds Stens Rte Phn �O, The Wins AvAciAiw• AmNWIs platy n. 1!M9 RECEIVED JAN 17 09 .%oow4xhT 3C"3L OGTR= NM no ELEWNTARY SCHOOL GRADW PLM ,..�.. - . I A. ' 1 E •V::•h t V t 4 / � ac Jef t 0 z — — — — — — — soLmmw ANG TomotAPM SWEY can w t 1 1 r I f s 1 N \ ,L• /i r r.—N • ..r �// DODD ROAD UPGRADE - 494.91 F.F. r r \ J�`r•_ • • N irr• �'� ± Nr �' =. �w '•'1."'.L�ii.Ti LTi..• �w—� is :1 L—. BOLNOW AND RwPFC SAWY �aewr ae:anerw X7,.5• {�r,:�;��:},�: •'�•.•,• }�• :.'},Ti• Vh •}};:}lf��:, y.' yy •+`i}``h'•••'•3i'•:•: •:�•.p{i.�C'v' '::tiv:} 7:+i• :'F.r;:;:r' ��:fi' • C vry r.. X to ,• f},y WATER TRUNK - 10.00 ACRES .. I r IP -t271 ! ,o .00 gg77gg 0� BB4. � li!� INI 164.4 I fi !!9 " LP -6 7:3i3 08 ! '=f SUBJECT PARCEL FIGO 1 city of sagari STORM SEWER aarno�►.d: standmrd PUBLIC plate9: WORKS MASTER PLAN DE J be prepared in time for the March 28th Advisory Planning Commission meeting. Appropriate actions to direct such rezoning may be taken at the March 21st Council meeting. 4. Finally, it will be necessary to appraise any surplus properties which the Council intends to offer for sale. The sale may be either by bid or negotiation provided that the purchase price is found by the Council to be fair in light of the appropriate appraisals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To direct staff to take appropriate actions to undertake a rezoning of the appropriate parcel and disposal of the remainder. Agenda Information Memo March 7, 1989 City Council Meeting DISCUSS/PROVIDE DIRECTION/HUD PARCELS IN LEXINGTON SOUTH P. Discuss/Provide Direction, HDD Parcels within the Lexington South Planned Development --As the Council is aware, the City through the auspices of the Park Department has been working at considerable length to acquire certain portions of the Lexington South Planned Development which were repossessed by HUD. In addition to the targeted property whose acquisition was intended, as a consequence of the acquisition, the City also acquired certain other parcels in Lexington South. Also, as a consequence of the acquisition of the targeted parcel, the previous reservoir site located at the northwest corner of Lexington and Diffley Roads is no longer required for City purposes. Staff has begun discussions on the potential disposal of the surplus properties resulting from this purchase. Enclosed on pages -_his a copy of a memorandum from Parks and Recreation Director Vraa to Community Development Director Runkle concerning this property. The report includes not only graphic depictions of the parcels in question but also assessment searches of certain parcels. As a consequence of this memorandum and at the direction of the City Administrator, the Community Development Department has undertaken to define the means by which the desired property will be rezoned to an appropriate use and the surplus properties will ID be disposed of. Enclosed on pages -.Aou will find a copy of a memorandum from City Planner Sturm concerning his discussions to date with Mike Dougherty of the City Attorney's office in this regard. Staff is requesting direction from the City Council concerning several issues: 1. It will be necessary for the City Council to find that the property is no longer necessary for City purposes and qualifies as surplus property. 2. The Council may refer the matter to the Advisory Planning Commission for review in light of the Comprehensive Guide Plan or the Council may deem that the sale of property has no relationship to the Comprehensive Guide Plan and that no action is necessary by the Advisory Planning Commission. If the Council finds the latter, a four- fifths vote would be necessary to approve such finding. 3. It will be necessary to undertake a rezoning of the parcel at the southwest corner of Diffley and Lexington to permit public facility development of the site. If the Council so wishes, the appropriate notification can TO: DALE RUNKLE, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Ch FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: FEBRUARY 24, 1989 RE: HUD PROPERTY/LEXINGTON SOUTH Dale, as you know the Parks and Recreation Department is in the process of acquiring property formerly held by Lexington South. Two of the parcels, one located south of Diffley Road, the other north of Wilderness Run Road, have been designated to be sold as "surplus property". It seemed to me that the Community Development Department should coordinate and handle the sale of these properties, rather than the Parks & Recreation Department. I have spoken to Tom Hedges regarding this, and he is in agreement. Therefore, I will assume that Community Development will take up the responsibility from this point on for the coordination and eventual sale of the land. (Jim Sturm has received a memo from Mike Daughtery concerning the property sale which will help guide you in this process). Please be aware that I have spoken to Brad Swenson about these two parcels. He does have an interest in both and will be submitting a letter of interest/proposal within the next two weeks. Also, Mark Parranto has an interest in the parcels. In addition to the two properties from Lexington South, there is a third property that is to be offered for sale. This is the property formerly designated for the water reservoir, north of Diffley Road, west of Lexington Avenue. Please coordinate with Tom Colbert regarding this parcel. The property off Diffley and the former reservoir site, should have priority in sales; at least, from this department's prospective. The parcel located immediately east of Walnut Hill Park, could have some parks purpose which we would like to review further. Consequently, until we have time to study this parcel,. I am in no particular hurry to see this parcel offered for sale. Proceeds from the sale of all properties will be returned to the park site acquisition and development fund, which is being used to finance the original purchase from Lexington South. Attached are photo copies of the two Lexington South parcels, along with the special assessment search on each. If I can assist you with the sales, I would be more than happy to provide you with that help. KV/bls cc: Tom Hedges, City Administrator Tom Colbert, Director of Public Works \� ■ 1L �., r rV Ol1'-��nn rr:�..t: -r �Ir = n••rIP == =: ; . c�l�i.: �t�l��■ �• �'� inner =�� C uunr.111' / _.o �f 1 .. s r2 -i p:\' q� r� l ) ! •l' �� a � •iCf - / 'II� i•�IIJ �1. . 2. V� '� �►+., . 1111►��■ _ �//rufulnl,�� 1�ir�4:.■IB ��■�■ _� I/0'■■uv�'� u.uul Ia . �i ■Nr ��►Al+ell r IA 1 /,y�� h .� yam, I�►�� e� ♦r (1 � ` � � IN • amele.e a.e••n .. ._. ... __ __. __ ...-.. .-•GIiVNIT No :t ala•a S •.. s Safi !• tr as ;, �r t d_:I me .r • .. ._- y S 89. 52' 25 E 736.39 1 I i r.. CUTLCT• A y ! VRIAI[ DRAM I IMPT l !SPER GO2 W SEE DE?A1L . - N 55.06'56 t 1 R • 230.97 ', oy4 'S • k4. • '> L•' 169.46 p r -S 82050, SC Z 80.O0 N 07.09' 10 _77 80.00 1zl��iF�JA' —N 82.50 ` Jtl—J e0.0 0 11 k 255.00 : oy 11 ` '1.°� ` £ rle 2ex it .. .,•lj�.. Q• L•83.09 3 a• l —SOJA • • ,l. L• i20.a9 q MIN : � w..•. • C j ,N, -1 c� ix a GOAT la 0 T IF • COUNTY'. STATE c .aw •wr,•�•n� MIOMIMA—i,.—,, wlaw.30•• ti •wwa•r w�' .V • , • •, , .Y• -`awl JIL'• .• q \ • Jr• +.mss`. • /' � P �� S�` , • t' �� • -. • 'SII• , a/.�' • ��{y .h• ' �. 04 y me TM O 396 ., / ••'fin' . T W T[ALY 47.20 `•{" ; ' : �, •—•• , •4 • �. a .. 16 .- �' ' + ■ WOO Woo � N 11636 94w .. � ' • ••+• ' . . ••. •' • • � • JwY•rn'. _q� 9497 i YONKT0IMN. N 23.07 WE '� µ' :r • e . . .� 62.08 • + LOTO� `* • _+ , . T q • SIM av:M i S • q 92.31 �' i `•ti;, ,. i• �• '"•. r N23043'02wE . fi•. .• " .: a \ r," i•�! ' �3 93.87 • 0 L 0 G K •i n • "*y YA ..... .� • 4 � ,. � / .. ...�. �... ..� Vis. _ • "t t1 /1�4• �, .r • �• •w 4 f Alw Jam... + �.. • •i ' , bs FA N 00.09 WE : �. • ' ' _ . �� :. • ;• '! 148.41 .' ::� " � .. +w'�..'....a _ ..n+� VSs ..: . � •• ��: • :A. a !:. I TRANSACTION Ir: R768 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY PROFErTV 1.';. TODAYS DATE: 01/27/89 ---SPECIAL FLAGS ---- 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-5-9-10 10-0:!61=4•• +; �•••0 ' •iii�C��iL•T` _-_.-__-_CiCCCii�Z=`iCS_-i-----_SiiiCCiiCi�iiiii.Liiii__iii_Ci�iiiii 5.A.* A&3FE• S; -Q7 Df SCP. VH YRS RATE TOTAL ANN. PRIN. PAYOFF COMMENT 10057 W:.;TF• r :_;al Of. 20 8.00% 684.15 34.21 371,. 2E 1(W574 Re -.4 . a7 GO 20 8.00% 368.29 18.42 202.57 i`I0570. =-- •r: . eO 20 P.O ': 3209.60 160.48 1765.2E 100579. .d4 We A°:E, 80 20 8.00% 3209.60 160.48 1765.23 100577 ;;:.:Fc� LAT 80 15 8.00% 516.53 34.43 206.60 10057A -JC-Tr-'v LA -1 SC 15 8.00% 432.41 28.83 172.9: 100647 WalEk'9AIN 83 15 10.54% 2019.60 134.64 1211.76 100649 S=W1.44 LAT 83 15 10.50% 5322.52 354.84 3193.52 10P5c;S UTT1 to ETF. ; -:C' T 00 0 .00% 93823.00 93823.00 93823.00 PEND 1OP51e IT'_;�I:S 00 15 .00% 15265.00 1017.67 1526E.00 PEND *****a Sl:^"mARY OF ACTIVE 15762.70 926.33 8894.26 COMM ****** THIS YEAR'S TOT P&I 1834.38 ** *** SUMMAR- OF PENDING 109088.00 109088.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY Pkl==nT TODAVS DATE- 01/27/89 ---SPECIAL FLAGS---- /� 1-2-3-4-3-6-7-8-9-10 70-02A,54'-�.f._l-2 S.A.4 a55_SSwE!Li =Ec-:r. YR YRS RATE TOTAL ANN.PRIN. PAYOFF COMMENT pie kse a J�h•Ic,r. -•t A--7' ; k•IF .00 .00 .00 CC T:T %'&i .00 0(.,,a .• ••rYM I now.. • • •tart we •w w.. .. A. m r. •.0 r mw u• • •. Y. + r rY i a•.rr.YY .•N• .. ..w.. WAL t HILLI `� „ E�ew /�Jj I o 30-od 029-75 r�` •. �: )20.00 wf- 7 o•r.o. ° OAR K ' A S of* ooe.ft IIUM ` •• -� .:'` '°ON I pt i ••': �•4R .w• r+• Y 0 ', w•,Ywr.r fir.•, . y 19040 i+ & a•P9 R� 'y�� imrtNOE19NCI • MR Vfjv NOMI! � � 'S � Nn�r-._ � � 9 I �i ` � ' � ."• ! u �110 11., . i3o tris ti� , 19040 fir ate'. '� :� '$vd� .rt �tY 2, ^• y �.r /.v H -98 a 4 •� ��'�."MIRTERFDRO✓� ,' � ii5 .�ei+,. `• ' SUDBERR• 64 • r • / r •i.' r• •" •meq 1 .• .r Y L- , • i.'r A••i• ' r \ .•� 7' V M i • • • e .t 4 a •� 1 f• . : N !a l.r I Y .r• • .• •w wN •� 'rRAN,S,- 7 NN TD% Fk7e-.8 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SEARCH SUMMARY TODA,S DATEe 01/27/89 ---SPECIAL FLAGS ---- 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10 10 3^-•:-G- J:, aW.010--f----- ------------------ -------- s=--------------- ----------------- S.A. & AFGSSSMEr. ' DESCR. 1f17s%i ccp:CC. : -T 10057E k'ATFP, LAT 100577 FFWr.k TRZ 10008! - PRE 4 1n05P! FTrRSET 1005PZ 5-W LA'S 10064: 6--7R 349- 1001,92 WLT.R 299-3 ta�aaa SUMMA.Rv OF ACTIVE a�raaat THIS ►'EAR'S TOT PSI YR YRS RATE 80 15 8.00% 80 15 8.00% 80 1_5 8.00%. so 15 8.00% SO 15 B. O0% 80 20 8.00% 80 20 8.00% 81 15 11.00% 81 15 11.00% TOTAL ANN.PRIPI. 8768.48 584.5-1 7341.04 489.41 5558.00 370.54 5558.00 370.54 5221.44 348.10 5531.12 276.56 1643.32 82.17 3728.76 248.59 2759.96 184.00 46110.12 2954.48 4890.94' mm PAYOFF COMMENT 35117.40 2936.44 2223.23 2223.23 2088.59 3042.13 903.8a 1740.12 1288.04 19952.98 FEB 28 189 16:60 MRS 743 P02 N/• rn /J 1%� /� 1, • , 7 \s" '' 4 Y , ' 9 3 ., t• \ S " T • . J ` n If w aWR:VL 3P!I_ - — _.\f0 •� II ° to ` �^ n s .,.:o „o . f. Ell, or uw• 9. - ►Z } 14 - .Pa . � I ° 41, 1 24 COUNTY TATE a , .,'_;° MEMO TOt TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR DALE RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1989 RE: HUD PROPERTY WITHIN LEXINGTON SOUTH P.D. This memo is intended to act as a guideline for the purchase and disposal of parts or all of four individual parcels within the Lexington South Planned Development. 1. The southwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road - current zoning: R-4 (multiple) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: D -III (Mixed Residential, 6 - 12 units/acre) 2. The northernly extension of Daniel Drive at Diffley Road - current zoning: R-3 (townhouse) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: CPD (Commercial Planned Development) 3. Along the north side of Wilderness Run Road and east of Walnut Hill Park - current zoning: R-2 (double) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: P (Parks) and D -I (Single Family) 4. A portion of the previously proposed/denied Soderholm Addition at the northwest corner of Lexington Avenue/Diffley Road - current zoning - R-4 (multiple) Comprehensive Guide Plan designation: D -I (Single Family) After discussion with Mike Dougherty, it has been determined that in order for the City to sell any or part of the parcels, the City Council must first find that: 1. The property is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was acquired, "surplus." 2a. The Advisory Planning Commission should review the proposed property to be sold assuring that there is no conflict with the Comprehensive Plan, however ...... 2b. The City Council may deem that the sale of the property has no relationship to the Comprehensive Plan and that no action is needed by the Advisory Planning Commission. A 4/5 vote is necessary. This process may begin at the March 7 City Council meeting if the Council declares the parcels as 'surplus' and directs the Advisory Planning Commission to initiate any desired rezonings and/or Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments. This action could be taken at the March 28 Advisory Planning Commission meeting and FEBRUARY 28, 1989 PAGE TWO Before any parcels can be sold, appraisals for each must be obtained. The Soderholm parcel was appraised recently at approximately $3.00 per sq. ft. The other two parcels will need appraisals. This is currently being coordinated by Mike Dougherty. The sale of the property does not need to be made a public bid, but can be negotiated on a contractual level as long as the offer for purchase is first determined by the City Council to represent a fair price. For now, I will await direction by the City Council on March 7. If rezonings and Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendments are initiated, I will coordinate the necessary applications/procedures for action by the Advisory Planning Commission on March 28. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know. JS/js Attach. CC: Mike Dougherty, McMenomy & Severson Jim Sheldon, McMenomy & Severson Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Ken Vraa, Director of Parks & Recreation Kristy Marnin, Planner 1 NOTE: Mike informed me there is a title problem on the proposed athletic field site at this time and hopes to have it cleared up before mid-March. Only if the City has clear title will we be able to initiate rezoning to a Public Facilities district. we will prepare all legal notifications as directed by the City Council in hopes that the issue is resolved prior to March 21. aka MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HBDGES DATE: MARCH 1, 1989 A meeting has been scheduled by the MWCC for Thursday, March 9 at 7:30 p.m. at the Dakota County Western Court Facility to examine how best to handle residual solids generated at the Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant. For more information, refer to the attached notice enclosed on page �L. KELZENBERG'S VIOLATION OF ACCESSORY HOUSING As you may recall in December 1987, the accessory housing application for the Kelzenbergs was denied. Due to several ordinance reviews and amendments, the City Attorney's office is now confident that a notice of violation can be served and a letter was sent out certified mail dated February 16. Mr. Yetzer has been notified that the letter would be served to Kelzenbe'/ A copy of the letter is enclosed on pages �_ r . through b STRATEGIC PLANNING / This office has received an outline of the strategic planning / goals and other material as prepared by Jim Brimeyer and once a memo has been prepared, a copy will be distributed to the City Council. The first work session to deal with the highest goal agreed upon by the Council and management team is scheduled for March 28. I thought it might be interesting for the City Council to review the mission statement that was adopted approximately one year ago, a copy is enclosed on page,-,) (—). Enclosed on page is a copy of the Municipal Legislative Commission's position regarding the League of Minnesota Cities Tax Coordinating Committee report. This position was adopted by the Board of Directors which Mayor Ellison serves on at a meeting held on Thursday, February 2. Also enclosed on pagesR!2aRD1s a copy of a summary sheet regarding property tax that was presented at a Twin West meeting by John Tomlinson. I: WWI C [Lin 14 in Ilil Enclosed on pages through c is a status report for Dakota County and the City of Eagan for assisted housing and community development as prepared by Dakota County Housing and C;) U::L- Redevelopment Authority. Enclosed on page is a letter from Health East, Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital, informing the City of the addition of a new Road Rescue Type III ambulance to the Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital ambulance fleet. Enclosed on pages ;a��2 through -2,;0 is a copy of a proposed aviation noise policy that will be considered at the National League of Cities Legislative Conference on March ll. Enclosed on pages7!q---Q3(ts a memo to City Administrator Hedges from Director of Public Works Colbert regarding a meeting he attended concerning the Burnsville/35W Transportation Coalition. POND LP -55 WATER ELEVATION Enclosed on pages -23 -7 -.As a copy of a owners regarding the Pond LP -55 water informing them of a neighborhood meeting March 8, 1989 in the Eagan City Council issue. /s/ Thomas L. Hedaes City Administrator -)(3 letter sent to property elevation level issue, scheduled for Wednesday, Chambers to discuss this Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL CO 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE 612 222-8423 The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC) will hold a public meeting to provide information on the findings of Phase II of the Residual Solids Management planning study. The purpose of the study was to examine how best to handle residual solids (the by- product that remains after wastewater has been treated) generated at wastewater treatment plants in the MWCC's southwest service area over the next 20 years. (The southwest service area includes wastewater treatment plants in Eagan, Shakopee and Chaska, which serve more than 500,000 people in those three communities and more than 20 others, including Burnsville, Bloomington, Savage, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Wayzata, Orono and parts of Apple Valley.) The meeting will be held on THURSDAY, MARCH 9, 7:30 p.m., at the Dakota County Western Court Facility, 2030 Cliff Road, Eagan. This meeting will deal primarily with MWCC's Seneca Plant, located in Eagan. (A later meeting will focus on MWCC's Blue Lake Plant, located in Shakopee.) Representatives of the engineering firm Black & Veatch, which conducted the study, will report their findings and present their recommendations. A question and answer period will follow. Information gathered at the meeting will be used by the Commission in formulating its residual solids management plan for the Seneca Plant. All interested people are invited and encouraged to attend the meeting. You may register in advance to speak by contacting David Downing of the MWCC's Office of Public and Community Relations, (612) 229-2100. You may also send written comments to this office at MWCC's Central Office. (See address below.) Comments must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, March 10, 1989. BY ORDER OF THE: METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFF}Rh7t4ACTION EMPLOYER EI)wARII B. MI,MENOMY LARRYS. SEVERSON' JAMES F. SI ELDON J. PATRICK IYII.("OX' 'I'I: R ENCI'. 1'. 111 HKIN %III II:\I`.I.I1 IuUGIII(ICI'% HE 111.1. 11A NB I MICHAVLE 'A I. i I.liIN h MA L11 KN91.1� IN N 416 I:\L<u Lb "LN51iD 1? NEh:IfIIM L\%K:\ February 16, 1989 CERTIFIED MA L - RRR Michael lzenberg 1725 De rwood Drive Eagan, MN 55122 McMENOMY & SEVERSON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW Ef REPLY TO: 7300 WEST 147TH STREET P.O. SOX 20.326 APPLE VALLEY, MINNESOTA 55124 TELKFAX NUMBER 4:12 MM ,81214:r!31:16 D REPLY TO: 144W SOUTH ROBERT TRAIL. ROSEMOUNT, MINNESOTA MW (612)4211155 RE: Residential Ordinance Violation Our File No: 206-6240 Dear Mr. Relzenberg: we write as City Attorneys for the City of Eagan. PA 111. J.tin I:I( PATRICK W. STEWART KKVIN 1'. CARROI.I. KENNETH R. IIALI. tiCUTT O-101INSfON 1 .1 O S I: I' I I I'. I:: \ H I . ha' MAIn' I.. I;OI.IK1: MICHAEL C. Md1ANN uP t'OUNSF.I. LEONARD I'. IIIERNAT .JOHN I:. VUKELICH You are hereby notified that you are in violation of Eaaan City Code, Section 11.20, Subd. 5. Your home is located in a district zoned R-1. This means that only one -family detached dwellings are permitted. By allowing renters, unrelated by blood, marriage or adoption, to reside in your lower level and providing them with complete independent living facilities, you are in violation of the above -referenced zoning ordinance. A violation of the zoning ordinance is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine up to $700.00 and/or 90 days in jail. The City staff has made numerous attempts to work with you on this matter to no avail. They have now turned the matter over to us for criminal prosecution. If you are not in compliance with the City zoning ordinance by April 1, 1989, you will be cited for criminal violation of the City zoning ordinance. OA�� McMENOMY & SEVERSON A PROFESSIONAL ASST II'I ATIIIN A'ITORNKYS AT LAN Michael Kelzenberg February 16, 1989 Page Two I look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible concerning this very serious matter. Sincerely, McMENOMY & SEVERSON, P.A. Joseph P. Earley J PE/di k cc: Dale Runkle, City of Eagan ,,T,6m Hedges, City of Eagan a (,co "It is the objective of the City of Eagan to encourage quality development. To accomplish this objective, the City will focus less on the quantity of development and more upon the effect. of development on the delivery of City services, the aesthetics of the community, the quality of life of current residents, the best interests of future residents, and an acceptable balance of residential, commercial and v public uses." MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION'S POSITION P REGARDING THE LMC TAR COORDINATING COMMITTEE r REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS .1,,I°The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) is a group of 15 metropolitan suburbs representing more than 570,000 Minnesota residents. Property tax burdens on these residents have been increasing at an alarming pace during the past few years. ty+� Therefore, the MLC has taken a keen interest in property tax reform, making it our number one priority during the 1989 C ,r legislative session. A major purpose of joining the League of Minnesota Cities Tax Coordinating Committee was to attempt in good faith an effort to arrive at consensus among all city organizations. This effort produced several recommendations with which we agree and others with which we could not agree. The MLC submits the following policy statement as its response to the Coordinating Committee's recommendations. MLC POLICY The MLC's highest legislative priority in 1989 is to reduce the tax burdens on homes which exceed $68,000 of market value. we believe that the Coordinating Committee's report did not go far enough in addressing this problem. Additional tax relief dollars must be directed toward areas with a concentration of mid and high valued homes. The MLC endorses the Coordinating Committee's recommendation to reduce the tax capacity on homes over $100,000 from 3.3% to 2.8%.. We also agree with reducing the tax capacity of homes between $68,000 and $100,000 from 2.58 to 2.08. In the future the MLC will strive to enact legislation which will eliminate or reduce the difference between these split classifications on homes. The MLC strongly opposes the concept of tax -based equalization aid (TBEA) as proposed in the Coordinating Committee's recommendations. This form of aid will increase rather than decrease the disparities between tax burdens in the Metro Area compared to tax burdens in Greater Minnesota. The MLC supports a property tax relief program to homeowners which is based on the following factors: 1. property tax relief must be dependable, 2. property tax relief should be calculated on a per home basis, and 3. property tax relief should not be expenditure driven. The MLC believes that the legislature, as a policy, should . direct state -paid relief dollars to the area of the state where tax increases are projected to occur in 1990. Only by adhering to this policy will the disparities be reduced between metro and non -metro areas. o ,��:•��.. M'j February 9, 1989 A PROPERTY TAX REFORM GOALS OF ADMINISTRATION 1. Reduce taxes on rental horsing, business, and mid -value homes. 2. Simplify classes and aid formulas. 3. Clarify state and local responsibilities. 8 MINNESOTA'S COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY TAX RANKINGS VARY GREATLY DEPENDING ON THE EXTENT OF PERSONAL PROPERTY (EQUIPMENT AND IIWENTORIES), WHICH MINNESOTA DOES NOT TAX TYPE OF PROPERTY High-tech factory Retail store Office building Combined offices & factories, industrial co. MINNESOTA PROPERTY TAX COMPARED TO OTHER STATES Half of average Double the average 50% to 100.5 above average 6% to 57% above average C IS THE PROPERTY TAX/LOCAL AIDS SYSTEM UNFAIR TO THE METRO AREA? 1. The metro area gets only about 1/3 of school aids. 2. Metro homes pay twice the property tax of comparable non -metro homes, yet receive no more services. 3. The metro area pays 65°x6 of state taxes. 4. Metro area property taxes have been rising much faster than non -metro taxes. Almost all states use a property -wealth equalization formula for school aid, and the metro area has property wealth about double that of non -metro area. Metro local governments, in total jd2 spend more. The overall mill rate is about the same in metro and non -metro areas. The property tax is a tax on the value of property. The metro area has much higher average individual incomes, still has much higher disposable income left after taxes. Metro area market values have been rising, non -metro values have been falling, especially farmland. Status Report for Dakota County** January 1989 Amount * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. o0 .;)- 1 of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total Section 8 Existing: Certificates 410 1143 1,553 +19 Vouchers 121 235 356 +2 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 200 580 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,162 2,466 3,628 +21 Amount Commercial/ of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase MHFA Local Participation 0 5 0 5 0 MHFA Home Improvement Loan 33 173 0 213 3 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 65 78 0 143 2 MHFA Home Energy Loan 10 135 0 145 2 Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0 CDBG Rehab Loan 90 182 0 272 3 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/A N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 371 1,499 0 1,870 16 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 612 2,161 8 2,791 26 * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. o0 .;)- 1 Status Report for the City of Eagan January 1989 ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Existing: Certificates Vouchers Section 8 New Construction Low Rent Housing 236 Rental TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Amount of Total (+/_)* 28 226 254 +5 25 64 89 +2 0 33 33 0 0 18. 18 0 0 144 144 0 53 485 538 +7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderlv MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 CDBG Rehab Loan 1 Weatherization 5 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT f2- * + = Increase/- = Decrease day Amount of Family Total Increase 14 16 0 3 6 0 10 11 0 6 7 1 68 73 0 101 113 1 HealthEast February 7, 1989 Mr. Thomas Hedges, City of Eagan Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mr. Hedges: Divine Redeemer Memorial Hospital 724 Nineteenth Aeenue North South St. Paul, MN 55075 612.450-4500 We are pleased to announce the addition of a new Road Rescue Type III ambulance to our fleet in Dakota County. This vehicle is "state-of-the-art" and includes a 16 -channel VHF radio in which we will be able to communicate to all police and fire agencies, as well as mutual aid services in our region. We are proud of this new acquisition. It will help us continue to give your city the best in pre -hospital care. Sincerely, Martin E. Forseth Operations Manager jl c: Harlan Dahl, Director HealthEast Transportation '.�.�)3 National Organization to Insure NO 09 10 So a Sound -controlled Environment Ee THOMAS N. DUFFY Executive Director 1620 EYE STREET, N. W. — 3rd FLOOR, WASHINGTON, D. C. 20006 a 202-429-0166 February 3, 1989 ^'r& 6 MEMORANDUM: TO: Board of Directors FROM: Thomas N. Duff'.Xkc, SUBJECT: N.O.I.S.E. Policy At Its last meeting, the Board of Directors discussed u1 proposed Aviation Nolse Policy. The consensus was that the policy proposal should be redrafted, sent to Directors and reconsidered at the Board meeting on March 11, 1989. The redraft Is enclosed. Please go over It before the meeting. If you cannot attend the March 11th meeting, please send me your comments before the meeting. I will make sure they are Introduced Into the discussion. aa� NOISE POLICY As one of America's most important national assets, it is imperative that the nation's system of airports is prepared to meet current and future transportation needs. Unfortunately, that system is in a shameful state of readiness. Straining to meet current transportation needs, today's airport system will be unfit to carry the burden of future transportation demands unless wide-ranging measures are undertaken immediately. Deregulation of aviation, coupled with an expanding economy, has dramatically increased the number of flights. This increase in flight frequency, coupled with the urbanization and suburbanization of land surrounding airports, has also dramatically increased the number of people impacted by aircraft noise. The millions of Americans affected daily by aircraft noise has magnified the political pressure to constrain operations at existing airports at the same time the growth in flights is dictating that airport capacity be expanded. It has become obvious that the existing airport system cannot handle the dual demands of increasing airport capacity and reducing the impact of aircraft noise. The aviation industry has proposed a "technofix", the implementation of an all Stage 3 fleet, in order to alleviate the bring relief to noise impacted people. These noise mitigation measures can be implemented without decreasing airport capacity. Land use planning should also be considered as a means of mitigating the effect of aircraft noise. Land use planning is best done on a local level and NOISE strongly supports the pre-eminent role of local jurisdictions in any land use decisions. Local airport operators should also retain their prerogative to implement noise mitigation procedures. NOISE believes that aircraft noise mitigation and expansion of the nation's aviation capacity need not be mutually exclusive goals. Aircraft noise reduction advocates and aviation industry officials can and should work together to bring aviation service into the 21st Century. Listed below are NOISE's recommendations for achieving an aviation system that is capable of handling transportation needs and is compatible with the environment: 1) The FAA should recommend, establish criteria for and fund a system of new regional jetports that would reduce the current strain on the nation's aviation system and be able to handle future demand. Local jurisdictions should construct and operate these jetports. The jetports should be constructed in areas where the noise impact would be minimal and where local jurisdictions are 3 - 7) Flight track monitoring and noise monitoring should be - required at all commercial airports. These reports should be made readily available to the public. 8) The FAA definition of noise impacted areas should be redefined and noise impact scales such as Ldn should be supplemented with or replaced with more meaningful measures. 9) Local jurisdictions should retain their pre-eminent role in land use planning and noise mitigation procedures around airports. Citizens in aircraft noise impacted areas should have input in land -use plans for areas surrounding airports and in noise mitigation plans. Preventive land use planning should be encouraged wherever possible, especially when planning new airports. MEMO TO: THOMAS L. HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: THOMAS A. COLBERT, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DATE: MARCH 2, 1989 SUBJECT: BURNSVILLE/35W TRANSPORTATION COALITION On March 2nd, a meeting was held at the Burnsville City Hall with representatives from the cities of Burnsville, Lakeville, Bloomington, and Richfield, as well as others from Dakota County, Burnsville Chamber, Scott County Transportation Coalition and other interested individuals to discuss the details and process of creating an organization to get actively involved in supporting and promoting the ultimate upgrading of 35W from Dakota County to downtown Minneapolis. References were made to previous special interest organizations such as the Urban Coalition of Mobility (UCOM), the Scott County Transportation Coalition (SCTC), the Laukka/494 Transportation Management Organization (TMO) and others. Despite the obvious local interests of the southern suburban communities adjacent to this corridor, there is a recognized need to provide a support organization to promote the improvements through the southern portion of Minneapolis to offset the growing organization of opposition in the southern neighborhoods of Minneapolis. The City of Richfield recognizes the impact the related construction of the upgrading would have on their community. However, they also recognize the greater negative impact of doing nothing or delaying the inevitable. I believe the original intent of inviting the City of Eagan to participate in this initial organizational meeting was to try and garner as much interest and support as possible in the early stages. From Eagan's perspective, as a community in northern Dakota County, I feel it would be in our subregional best interest to support this organization. However, further review would have to determine if there would be sufficient benefit/conflict of providing proposed financial support for this organization in lieu of our own transportation issues and concerns. I don't believe that Eagan should provide technical support in lieu of the ready availability of professional consultant services. The extent of subregional or inner community political support should be left to the discretion of the City Council and yourself. From the perspective of a neighboring community and northern Dakota County city, the appropriate positive support would be worthwhile. a3C) They have scheduled their next meeting to be held at 7:30 a.m. Thursday, March 9th at Burnsville City Hall to discuss the creation of a mission statement and possible identification of foundation goals to be announced during a press release associated with the Governor's visit to Burnsville during that City's "Capitol for a Day" scheduled for 11:45 a.m., Wednesday, March 15th at the Burnsville VFW. At the next scheduled meeting of this committee, they will also attempt to formalize an identifiable organizational name. Attached are handouts distributed at this recent meeting. I would like to discuss with you the necessity and/or appropriateness of Eagan's representation at future meetings. Please let me know if you would like to have me or anyone else attend this next scheduled meeting. Respectfully submitted, Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/ jf 23 � The following comments may help you in organizing your task force: a Try to have the Task Force represent as broad a background as possible. The SCTC has members from the cities, county, townships, chambers of commerce, industrial commissions, recreational attractions and most importantly the citizens of the community. It is the grass -root involvement that makes this Coalition go. * Clearly establish your goals and objectives. Everyone in the Task Force should be saying the same thing. Previous organizations have failed due to internal fighting over which project or which segment of a project should have top priority. We have three projects as our goals and we refuse to prioritize them. Whatever project needs our attention at a particular time, we give it our attention. + Do things right. Don't cut corners or reduce costs if at all possible. A well organized meeting or a professional -like publication is long remembered. It is also a positive memory -not a negative memory as could be the case if things are not handled well. f It costs to do things right. If you don't have the money to accomplish a large number of items, do less, but do them to the highest standard feasible. Our budget is $60,000-$80,000 per year. • Keep people informed. An informed person is your best supporter. + Support other organizations, if you can. Hopefully, they will be able to support you. Our philosophy is to support increased transportation funding State-wide. While we are very parochial in support of our projects, we firmly believe that this philosophy will ultimately benefit our projects. + Keep your legislators involved. We meet with them approximately every two weeks. • Work with Mn/DOT and other agencies. Ask for their input and help. Don't demand that things should be done. Working with someone is much easier than against. • Members must make a firm commitment. We have a Work Group/Executive Committee established that meets every two weeks for approximately two hours to review activities involving the Coalition. We then assign workload to the work group members for the upcoming two weeks. If you don't have members that can faithfully commit considerable time to the organization, it will not hold together over a long per d of tim_ C) 3 �- i Is •• �� m..r +•i . V," amii V� r>~ W� Uma it ems, 1997 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 pw ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ IS W so IL 8 J V O 4 W y� 0z ? O J 6�(� H=Fes', p 0 V WW 00 yy T - D miN. . rPreliminary Project Schedule M6 m—rs04 Ul0.r110M1 01 h0n000rIHr00 - M011000MM1 Lown" W W ¢ 8 SCOPING AND 0 ALTERNATIVES IDENTIFICATION O W DRAFT O ENVIRONMENTAL � MPACT A ATEMENT ri ... Figure yd Nam) 4 GEOMETRIC DESIGN v 3 a u v u _ 3 AND RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION so IL 8 J d 7 6 O! ? O yty IL 12 yy T sa.eruala�s h95Www�lerl� . D miN. . rPreliminary Project Schedule (Schedule Is tentative and will change periodically) m—rs04 Ul0.r110M1 01 h0n000rIHr00 - M011000MM1 Lown" ... Figure yd Nam) 4 x x n a. w M " Mil kA " " bt " G " " M MW TABLE 1 COMPARISON OF EXISTING VOLUMES ON 1-35W AND PROJECTED CONSTRAINED TRAFFIC DEMAND IN 2010 (1) Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation (1986 Counts) (2) At Franklin Avenue (Includes traffic from both I -35W North and T.N. 65) (3) See Addendum to Technical Memorandum 19 Load Point 1986%&1 2010%' % Change, Loaa roinc azs¢• LY_X s= North of 172,800 2260400 318 North of 7,200 10,000 398 Lake Street(2) Lake Street(2) South of 143,100 217,800 528 South of 5,660 90800 738 60th Street. 60th Street South of 87,600 138,800 588 South of 31800 61250 648 66th Street 66th Street �► South of I-494 98,400 178,800 828 South of I-494 4,170 8,050 938 -�ow ,800 7�0i At Ninnesota 4,150 7,200 738 a River , River (1) Source: Minnesota Department of Transportation (1986 Counts) (2) At Franklin Avenue (Includes traffic from both I -35W North and T.N. 65) (3) See Addendum to Technical Memorandum 19 ►. rFAAIf 11 1!NNW VAM TABLE 1 A.M. PEAK ENTRANCE RAMP DELAY NON)EMBER, 1986 I A.M. Peak Hour ITotal Time Metered I--------- --------------------------------------------- IDelay I Maximum 1 for NOV Metered Average I Maximum Delay I Avg. Ramp Traffic Metering Total I Queue per NORTHBOUND I Veh. Volume Volume Rate Delay*1 Length+ Vehicle Entrance Ramps 1(min.) (veh.) (veh.) (sec/veh) (hrs) I (veh.) (min.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- pakota Cty Rd 421 1.9 138 1101 3.3 4.1 I 44 (50) 2.4 purnsville Pkwy 1 3.3 356 10.1 9.5 1 29 (18) 6.1 wy 13 Loop 1 5.4 454 7.9 1.0 1 65 (22) 11.1 .(�iwy 13 Dirct Legl 1.4 189 362 9.9 .5 1 18 (30) 3.0 (Cliff Rd (122nd)1 1.4 369 9.8 .4 1 24 (20) 4.7 82nd Street 1 0.9 -- 277 13.0 4.2 1 11 (18) 3.0 I-494 Loop 1 0.6 -- 497 7.2 4.9 1 15 (18) 1.5 I-494 Direct Legl 0.3 -- 109 33.0 0.6 I 5 (35) 2.1 76th Street 1 0.5 41 165 21.8 1.5 1 8 (16) 2.9 66th Street 1 3.0 56 142 25.4 7.0 1 17 (28) 7.3 Lyndale Avenue 1 4.5 -- 194 18.6 14.7 1 19 (18) 6.5 60th Street 1 4.3 -- 196 18.4 14.2 1 22 (20) 7.3 Diamond Lake Rd 1 4.1 29 236 15.3 16.0 1 21 (21) 5.7 35th Street 1 2.2 -- 403 8.9 15.0 1 20 (18) 3.9 SOUTHBOUND Entrance Ramps 31st Street 10.9 -- 322 11.2 4.9 1 21 (20) 2.1 36th Street 1 0.6 -- 375 9.6 3.9 I 12 (14) 1.8 46th Street 1 0.5 -- 389 9.3 3.0 1 8 (20) 1.2 Diamond Lake'Rd 1 0.4 -- 280 12.9 1.9 1 7 (28) 1.6 66th Street# 1 0.5 -- 108 13.9 1.8 I 7 (25) 2.4 * Based on average delay per vehicle and metered traffic volume measured in vehicle -hours. + The number in parentheses is the approximate storage capacity of the entrance ramp (in vehicles) without spilling -back into the upstream streets/intersection. # Meter was in operation only from 7:16-7:41 a.m. 0 OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD. P.O. BOX 21199 EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55121 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 March 1, 1989 Re: Pond LP -55, Request To Raise Existing Controlled Water Elevation Dear Property Owner: VIC EllISON Mv/a THOMAS ELAN DAVID K GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHER THOMAS HEDGES Ok AmK1bhulq EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE citya With the recent development of the Wilderness Ponds Addition east of ChesMar Drive and north of Dunberry Lane within the Chas Mar Additions, a controlled storm water sewer outlet was installed from Pond LP -55 located immediately east of Oak Leaf Circle in the Ches Mar 4th Addition. Attached to this letter you will find a copy of the mailing list and map showing the property owners who are being sent this information. As you can see, there presently exists two major depressions located between Dunberry Lane and Wilderness Curve on the north and Oak Leaf Circle and Oak Chase Lane on the east. The City has received various comments and concerns regarding the proper long-term water elevation for these two major wetland depressions. With the recent development of the Wilderness Ponds Addition on the north, this storm water outlet lowered the previous flooded water elevation from approximately 923.0 to 916.0. Most recent comments made to City Hall have requested consideration to raise the controlled elevation to its previous level of approximately 923.0. Additional research pertaining to water quality issues has now been added to the long history of discussion pertaining to the controlled elevations for these wetlands. Therefore, the City would like to invite all interested property owners (or their representative) to an informative neighborhood meeting scheduled for 7:00 p.m.,, Wednesday, March 8, 1989, in the Eagan Council Chambers. A review of the history and the various concerns pertaining to the water elevations will be discussed along with water quality impacts of various elevations and an explanation of various processes available to pursue a desired change in the existing water elevation for Pond LP -55. THE LONE OAK TREE... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY OL Y7 March 1, 1989 Page 2 Also enclosed please find a synopsis of the history associated with these pond elevations as prepared by the City's consulting engineer as well as typical letters on file that represent various perspectives and desires regarding the referenced pond elevations. Because of the complexity of the issue and related aspects, it will be difficult to discuss this individually with interested property owners. Therefore, it is hoped that this neighborhood meeting will provide an opportunity to present all this information in a comprehensive manner. Therefore, if you have any interest, I strongly encourage you to attend this meeting. Sincerely, , -0 Thomas A. Colbert, P.E. Director of Public Works TAC/jj cc: Mike Foertsch, Assistant City Engineer MILyor'6 City Council Thomas L. Hedges, City Administrator Enclosures DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY I.D. NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEG. DATE DELETE 10-17103-050-01 BRUCE•P MILLER R' ._% -Cl F• & L'i NTH I A C GRALTON 01 01 000000 N 4520 OAKLEAF CIR ?77 DUUBERRY LN 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-17103-060-01 RONALD B & NORMA NESHEIM 01 01 000000 N 4522 OAK LEAF CIR 4e"1 CAI' L'FiASi L;7 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-17103-170-01 PETER W & MAUREEN SORENSEN 01 01 861030 N 1285 DUNBERRY LN U•.{ Hi:,S'E LN •01 02 000000 N EGGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-17103-180-01 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DWIGHT F & CAROLE A WATSON 01 01 000000 N 1283 DUNBERRY LN DATE 01 02 000000 N EABAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N RANSACT:I•7N% R745 PROPERT% I.B. 10-171[•4 ;.0• -.:2 NAME AND ADDRESS' RECORD PISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE BEG. DATE DELETE R' ._% -Cl F• & L'i NTH I A C GRALTON 01 01 871 110 N ?77 DUUBERRY LN 01 02 N Eu =ON MN 55122 01 03 N FR_DERTC E & LINI`A BUDDLE 01 01 000040 N 4e"1 CAI' L'FiASi L;7 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-5350' -c -50-02 RICHARD L & DIANE E NEY 01 O1 000000 N U•.{ Hi:,S'E LN 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MM 55123 01 03 000000 N RANSACTION. R751 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS PROPERTY I.D. NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEG. DATE DELETE 10-53501-060-02 JAMES C & VEONA MARTIN 01 01 000000 N 4503 OAK CHASE LN 01 02 000000 N EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 000000 N 10-84275-250-02 GERALD R BULL 01 01 870202 N A585 SLATER RD #104 01 02 N LAGAN MN 55122 01 03 N 70-84275-260-02 WILDERNESS PONDS INC 01 01 870202 N 412c QUEBEC AVE #202 01 02 N NEW HOPE MN 55427 01 03 N 10-84275-2-70•-:12 WILDFRNESS PONDS INC 01 01 870202 R 4724 OLIEFEC AVE 0202 di 42 N NEW NOFE MN 55427 01 03 N SINSACT.IONs R755 PROPERTY I.D. 10-84275-280-02 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEC. TIMOTHY J & MARGARET MURPHY 01 01 1266 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 EAGAN MN 55123 01 03 10-84275-290-02 000000 N CHRISTOPHER & SUZANN COLBY 01 01 1270 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 EAGANs MN 55123 01 03 10-84275-300-02 RALPH E & DOROTHY A ERICKSON 01 01 1274 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 EAGAN MN 55124 01 03 10-84275-310-02 JOHN E JR & LECUETTA FLYNN 01 01 1278 WILDERNESS CURVE 01 02 F_AM)AN MN 55123 01 03 ANSACT7Or.: -2755 "ROPER7V I D. N{BACT701j: F':. •- 'ROPERTV I.D- 0-1710 4-1 G '---r 1 N"^:9E AND ADDRE88 RECORD °_!: r - .r"- LE•"ENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS WME AND A,^.Dc =SS TYPE BE&. :_O:- [ k F<FNAE L SFANDE 03 01 • 7r '. WI'_1`�RNESS CLIR 01 02 Er .AN M!J E'' • %� C1 03 NAME AND ADDRESS RECORD DISPLAY SUPPLEMENTAL NAME AND ADDRESS NAME AND ADDRESS TYPE SEC. EVERETT I & JOYCE TOLLERUD 01 5240 11TH AVE S 01 MPLS MN 55417 01 0-17103-200-01 JAMES & GAIL OLIJNEK 01 1279 DUNBERRY LN 01 EAGAN MN 55123 01 0-17103-200-01 '24D DATE DELETE 880809 N N N 880908 N N N 880301 N N N 880927 N N N DATE DELETE 841327 N 14 r' DATE DELETE 01 000000 N 02 000000 N 03 000000 _ N 01 000000 N 02 000000 N 03 000000 N �y, 1 . � • • • Sl �y _ r ,r P � � • QI , 1 •4r r • / • „ � � •r VL V LANE L• 999 1 • w 1 = OII-02 Lip w INNM •• Ca sy n n a •, L r, Lr\ 11 M • WW •• •s r _ \O •r' rr• -_ BYDDLB ' Q YII1 / ' M! • ' ,'�' S w D ` 7o-"auD A/ i 1 *I I1 • I t • - / uait40 Ak ; / A r �„� nleaiurl no • i O dw .�� ' 1 10 N / ' -� C ' i 05, LORZ ti , .• N 12k D. Bonestroo OEM Rosene "Anderllk & Associates Engineers & Architects November 16, 1988 City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Attn: Mr. Tom Colbert On G. RWesrA4 PE !Atli A Gutlon, PE TMmrs W. PLRnon. P.E. 1116M RoeerrL RE NOWO W. FOM RE M hW C Lp%IL PE JAeplr C Andu k PE. GW Wd C aAUMX PE J m R. WIY4 PE aadlM A LanWg. PE Jon A bxff& , P.E. aAaWM P. Anile PE WdWdE%n PE MAk A HY PE 41thA Eatln. PE Jt/re, C ohm PE Ted r PAK RE Ask R. RW & ►E Go R. 00k. ►E W We t RararrWn. PE NOW C R,dxt, AIA lhW E Noyes PE NOM L Ph11Wk. PE Thr E Anym PE Mom 4 SdiWddL PE 0add 0. Ladm PS Ha A Swimra PE Marvin L SorWIL ►E 0~1 EdW mn, PE am A Seip PE Nft1cawm PE MRk a Wtlds RE CWb AE - Im AL Pawebky IWWn kl 01mn Sum AL Bwrb% CPA Hes Pond LP -55 and LP -55A Outlet City Project No. 448 - Our File No. 49360 Dear Tom, I have attempted to list the sequence of events for the above project which are listed below: 1.) May 1970 - Aerial Survey performed by Mark Hurd. Elevation Pond LP -55 918.3 and LP -55A 914.5 (Ney's Pond). 2.) March 1978 - Ches Mar 4th and 5th Addition were developed and 15' storm •ever was constructed into Pond LP -55 at elevation 918.55 which is also approximate water level. 3.) December 28, 1984 - Dick Ney presented letter to Mayor and Council ex- plaining the high water level experienced in Pond LP -55A (pond in Ney's backyard) is the result of the high water level in Pond LP -55. He ex- plained by controlling Pond LP -55 at an elevation of 918 or lower would stabilize Pond LP -55A. The average water levels in Pond LP -55 and LP -55A in 1984 were 923.0. 4.) July 16, 1985 - A public hearing was held for Project No. 448 - Pond LP -55 Outlet. This project proposed constructing a storm sever outlet for both Pond LP -55 and LP -55A to Pond LP -54. The controlled elevation for Pond LP -55 was assumed to be 920 while LP -55A was assumed to be 916. Easements were required from 3 platted lots in Chas Mar 5th Addition and the un - platted parcel to the north. Trunk area assessments were proposed against the two unplatted parcels to the north. Property owners to the north ob- jected to assessments and granting easements. Council closed public hear- ing and requested staff to revise preliminary report. It was also felt DNR should investigate water levels and give their input. 5.) October 7. 1985 - I prepared a letter to Tom Colbert explaining the re- sults of the DNR establishing NOW's for each pond. The DNR recommended the NOW for Pond LP -55 be 923.3 while LP -55A be 922.8. The existing water levels at that time in Pond LP -55 and LP -55A were 922.9 and 923.0, respectively. Page 1. 25 2335 West Highway 36 a St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-6364600 5.) October 29. 1985 - Neighborhood meeting was held with effected property owners to discuss DNR results. Dick Ney objected to the elevations estab- lished by the DNR that they were too high. 6.) December 3. 1985 - A formal public hearing was held where Project No. 448E was discussed and three options were presented. Option I provided for a storm sever outlet from Pond LP -55A (NVL 918.5) to LP -55 (NVL 918.0) to LP -54. Option II provided for only storm outlet from LP -55 (NUL 918) to LP -54. In each case Option I and II crossed the unplatted parcels to the north at the best location from a construction standpoint. Option III provided a storm sever outlet from Pond LP -55 and LP -55A along the east- erly line of the unplatted parcel to the north to LP -54. Option III was extremely costly because of overdepth and additional pipe. No one could agree on course of action so staff was directed to restudy project and develop plans for the property to the north so the storm sever construc- tion between Pond LP -55 and LP -54 could accommodate future development. 7.) April 29. 1986 - A neighborhood meeting was held with effected property owners to update project status. Based on recent development plans for the unplatted property, an alignment was established and it was stated a pipe from LP -55 to LP -54 would be built controlling Pond LP -55 at 918. Dick Hey again stated an NVL for Pond LP -55 at 918 was too high and should be 916.0. 8.) November 18. 1986 - Bids were received and a contract was awarded based on constructing a storm sever pipe from Pond LP -55 to LP -54. The outlet pipe from Pond LP -55 was built to elevation 916.0. The water elevation in Pond LP -55 on October 20, 1986 was 923.7. It should be noted the control out- let NH for Pond LP -55 does have boards and its NUL can be easily adjusted. 9.) December 1986 - Storm sever was constructed per plan. 91'..0) C (917.1) Presently, Pond LP -55 and LP -55A are at elevation 916.4 and 918.0 respective- ly. I have also attached certain letters which you may find helpful. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Yours very truly, BONESTRO 0, ROSENE, ANDERLIR i ASSOCIATES, INC. c� Nark A. Hanson NAH:li Page 2. 25 ��Lk7_) MINNESOTA RECEIVED NOV 2 9 1988 4L DAKOTA COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT SOIL Aron WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS November 28, 1988 Tom Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Tom: Farmington Professional Building P.O. Box 129 621 Third Street Farmington, MN 55024 Phone: (612) 4638626 As requested, I inspected Pond LP -55 and attempted to determine the pond water quality at different depths. The Walker model indicates that, although the water quality will improve as the water depth increases, the pond will be eutrophic regardless of the water depth. In addition, a change in depth is not likely to affect the water clarity in the pond significantly. In a shallow pond, the nutrient levels will be high but the growth of plants such as Cattails and Reed Canary grass will shade out algae and duckweed, thereby limiting their growth. As water depth increases, the decrease in nutrient concentrations will tend to reduce algae and duckweed growth and allow the water clarity to be good. The main advantage in increasing the pond depth will be to reduce nutrient loading todownstreamwater bodies. The Walker model indicates that nutrient loading to Thomas Lake can be reduced by about nine pounds per year if the pond depth is increased to six feet ( an increase of four feet). to cdPv 9.10.0 Further increases in pond depth would have only minimal impacts on the nutrient retention in the pond. Another consideration with raising the pond level is the feasibility of maintaining the water level between rainstorms in dry years. Most ponds in Minnesota are influenced by groundwater flows. During dry conditions water typically flows from lakes and ponds into the ground water. Because ground water levels drop during drought conditions, pond and lake levels also decrease. This may expose mud flats during time periods between rainstorms. The degree of pond level drop will depend in part on the difference between the pond level and the groundwater table. Raising the pond level significantly above the groundwater table ( which is probably very close to the long term normal pond level), may create some aesthetic problems. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 2 4k� The existing tree line around the pond suggests that the normal pond level was about two to three feet above the current level. Maintaining the pond level seven feet above the current level, therefore, may be very difficult. If you have any questions regarding this assessment of LP -55 please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, John Barten District Limnologist December 28, 1984 ffiyor B. Blomquist e/o Thomas Hedges, Eagan City Ball and Eagan City Council Members Eagan City Administrator 3830 Pilot Knob Road Bagan, Finnesota 55122 Be: Construct an outlet to pond LP55 to maintain a level that will eliminate the continual flooding of lots 49 5 and 69 Block two, Uak Chase Second Addition. Dear Mayor Blomquist and Council- Members: We are requestinn the construction of an outlet from pond LF55 as pro- posed on Eagan's Master Storm Sewer Plan. Since the construction and development of Ches Mar 4th and 5th Additions in 1978 we have had con- tinual flooding of our property. Pond LP55 is approximately 200 feet west of the pond adjacent to our property. This pond was not recognized on ]agan's Master Ponding Flan when Ches Mar was developed. We discussed with Mr. Rosene (at the June 1977 Planning Commission meeting on Ches Mar Development and several times later) the potential problems that could occur when storm run off water is Piped into a shallow pond with no outlet. We were assured there w uld be no problems. Compounding the small holding capacity of the ponds was the lack of erosion control in the Ches Mar development as the hillside washed down, more fill was dumped in the washouts only to washout again. Mr. Colbert's October 1980 letter to Tollefson Builders and Gabbert De- velopment Co. recognizes the flooding, the siltation and the altered per- colation of the pond. Our letter to the Mayor and City Council dated July 6, 1981 chronologizes our effort to get some relief from these problems. At our proddin .the city has been monitoring the levels of both ponds aince April 1964. The ponds, as surveyed by the city, maintain approxi- mately the same elevation. The original topographical map of the area before develo:ment showed the elevation of LP55 at -.18.3 and the pond adjacent to Oak Chase at 914.6 feet. Since the Ches Mar storm sewer run off was piped into pond LP55, both ponds have risen, floodinc wooded areas. The pond flooding our lots has been pumped twice and both times the pond continued to rise after pumping stopped, even during a lone dry spell. Pond LP55 decreased during this time, hence, the conclusion water from pond LP55 is seeping into the pond on/adjacent to our property. The city engineers agree the seepage between the two ponds is preventing our pond from receding. ;Q � The natural treeline on our property follows the elevation contour 918. It is imperative that pond LP�5 be maintained at 918 or lower to protect the trees on our property. The Master Storm Sewer Plan sets the planned outflow elevation of LP55 at 920, but didn't plan on the seepage between ponds. Even at elevation 918 there will be times during heavy run off that elevation 918 will be exceeded. Since the floodinc into the trees began, 66 trees from approximately 10 to 58 inches in circumference have eat her tipped over or died or both on lot 5 alone. Also, one tree that tipped over narrowly missed a parked car in front of the garage and another dead tree fell on the deck behind the house. There are many more dead ones that will have to be taken down to avoid falling on the houses on lots 5 and 6. This is a serious ?r oblem and must be corrected. This past summer the water was up to the fill behind both houses on lots 5 and 6. On lots 5 and 6, 90 feet of the 180 foot deep lots were flooded. Since the temporary pump was removed in September 1984 the pond has flooded to within 20 feet of the fill again. This 7e aves us no backyard and based on the last seven years, continual rising waters and more dead trees. The pond will have to be pumped again this spring. The storm sewer outfall on pond LP55 was as much as 20 inches under water this summer bef::re pumping. If that conditon remains into minter the storm sewer would freeze shut causing some real .roblems in the streets it drains during a winter rain or thaw and durin7 the siring thaw. The problems mentioned above should never have occured with Roper city engineering- and supervision of the developers. The initial storm sewer engineering was inadequate in not recognizing the volumn of run off, the seepage between ponds, and the holding, capacities of the ponds. We have been very patient the last seven years and feel it is time this problem is corrected. If the LP55 outlet is constructed at elevation 918 or lower this would help stabilize the ponds, allow us to use our backyards again (a garden, playhouse, etc.) and save the remaining trees. It is very important to us to stabilize the pond as soon as possible. We will be waitin_ to hear of your plan to accomplish this. Sincerely, �4z�� 4497 oak Chase Lane ,_zagan, t:innesota 55123 lton D. Shean 4491 Oak Chase Lane Eagan, Minnesota 55123 James Martin !(503 Oak Chase Lane Fagan, Minnesota 55123 to: Mr. Rich Hefti, Eagan Public Works Department X 4 1 J October 28, 1985 Mr. Richard M. Hefti, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21199 Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Dear Mr. Hefti: Re: Storm Water Outlet for Pond LP -55 6 LP -55A; City Project 0448. After discussion with you on this date regarding City Project #448, we concluded that we are against any project which would either: 1. Damage the environment (trees, landscape, etc.) of our property. 2. Effect any additional assessment. � 4 LZ.9) The water level of Pond LP-55(on our property) is fine as is, and we have no interest in making any changes. It should be noted and under- stood that jointly we own in excess of one-half of the property surrounding the Pond LP -55. Sincerely, James S Gail Olijnek 1279 Dunberry Lane Lot 20, Block 1 Ches Mar Fourth Addition JAO/go John i Tarilynn Radford 1277 Dunberry Lane Lot 10, Block 2 Ches Mar Fifth Addition cc:homas Colbert, Director of Public Works lark Hanson, Consulting Engineer DA KENO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY C0UNCIIM24BER.S FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 6, 1989 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR MARCH 7, 1989 I,r G :.r: w'. In the informative section of your packet there are pages numbered 228 and 227, in that order. Please replace that page with the attached numbered 224 through 228,. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City'Administrator NOISE POLICY STATEMENT As one of America's most.important national assets, it is imperative that the nation's system of airports is prepared to meet current and future transportation needs. Unfortunately, that system is in a shameful state of readiness. Straining to meet current transportation needs, today's airport system will be unfit to carry the burden of future transportation demands unless wide-ranging measures are undertaken immediately. Deregulation of aviation, coupled with an expanding economy, has dramatically increased the number of flights. This increase in flight frequency, coupled with the urbanization and suburbanization of land surrounding airports, has also dramatically increased the number of people impacted by aircraft noise. The millions of Americans affected daily by aircraft noise has magnified the political pressure to constrain operations at existing airports at the same time the growth in flights is dictating that airport capacity be expanded. It has become obvious that the existing airport system cannot handle the dual demands of increasing airport capacity and reducing the impact of aircraft noise. The aviation industry has proposed a "technofix", the implementation of an all Stage 3 fleet, in order to alleviate the aircraft noise problem. while quieter aircraft will make a positive impact -on -the problem, it will not resolve it. "Quieter noise" can not compensate for the frequency of overflights that degrade the quality of life for those living under flight paths. The Federal, Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed the implementation of a system of new regional jetports. These new aviation hubs would be located in strategic areas across the country to facilitate growth in the aviation system. The jetports would be located outside urban areas with appropriate zoning to preclude inappropriate development around the jetports. Urban areas would be linked to the jetports through the use of high speed rail and freeways. While the FAA has proposed this system, it has not done enough to see that it will come to fruition. The FAA policy of only granting funding to current airport proprietors works against the establishment of new jetports. The National Organization to Insure a Sound -controlled Environment (NOISE), feels the establishment of new regional jetports is one of the long-term solutions to the nation's. capacity and aircraft noise problems. In order to bring about such a system, the FAA needs to change its funding policy so that governmental jurisdictions, other than those that currently operate airports, can qualify for funding. Existing airports should also implement other noise mitigation measures that would bring relief to noise impacted people. These noise mitigation measures can be implemented without decreasing airport capacity. Land use planning should also be considered as a means of mitigating the effect of aircraft noise. Land use planning is best done on a local level and NOISE strongly supports the pre-eminent role of local jurisdictions in any land use decisions. Local airport operators should also retain their prerogative to implement noise mitigation procedures. NOISE believes that aircraft noise mitigation and expansion of the nation's aviation capacity need not be mutually exclusive goals. Aircraft noise reduction advocates and aviation industry officials can and should work together to bring aviation service into the 21st Century. Listed below are NOISE's recommendations for achieving an aviation system that is capable of handling transportation needs and is compatible with the environment: 1) The FAA should recommend, establish criteria for and fund a system of new regional jetports that would reduce the current strain on the nation's aviation system and be able to handle future demand. Local jurisdictions should construct and operate these jetports. The jetports should be constructed in areas where the noise impact would be minimal and where local jurisdictions are 3 1, willing to impose zoning restrictions thatwould minimize future impacts. — Rapid transit systems should be encouraged by the government and aviation industry as a means of linking the new regional jetports to metropolitan areas. 2) All additions to the current air carrier fleet should be Stage 3 aircraft. The manufacture or importation of Stage 2 aircraft for operation in the United States should be halted. 3) All Stage 2 aircraft operations in the United States should end by a date mutually agreed upon by NOISE and the Federal Government. 4) Incentives should be made available to facilitate the conversion to a Stage 3 fleet. 5) The FAA should establish a Stage 3.5 fleet deadline. Stage 3.5 should be approximately 3 to 4 decibels quieter than Stage 3. 6) Special procedures for evening flights should be considered at airport locations with noise problems. These may include night curfews or restriction of evening flights to quieter aircraft. The FAA should comply with the local noise mitigation procedures. MINUTES OF REGULAIC:1BETING BE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL B�'@11$t:1k�lpiESOTA FEBRUARY 21, 1999 A regular meeting ofs#' Council was held on Tuesday, .: •:..: February 21, 1989, at 6:3 '"p�::'t�le;.gagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and dinncilei�nbers Wachter, Egan, Gustafson and McCrea. Also presagt were;City Administrator Tom Hedges, Public Works Director T-#�::Colbe;:•t, Community Development Director Dale Runkle and QAttlrssei7ames Sheldon. r •q-,4 At the request of the applicant, Item E. under New Business (Conditional Use Permit - Naegele Outdoor Advertising) was continued. Wachter moved, GustaL644i*seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All votid%1" ' 7rar.,•. February 7. 1989, Counczliiiiie'r Egan requested an addition on page 9, paragraph 5, to ilk Mike Nicky as being present at the meeting. Egan also requested a change on page 12, paragraph 6, correcting Mr. Wagner's first name to •Ralph'. Mayor Ellison request,#:�t#�{t-tzti on page 7, paragraph 31 to the motion regarding the massaije:iotdiriarige to state •The matter was continued to review proposed alts*pati :g,• Councilmember McCrea requested a nge on page 14, paragraph 3. The first sentence should read 'Councib'kember McCrea stated the City should remain in the role of monitoring and over -sight and should not be in the role of creating, and that the present policy could be taken and modified to address the City's concerns.• She stated 'The City could set greater specifications and that it would be easier to review others' work than your own work;:::.' Egan moved, McCrea se430AdA4t:::Eba. lotion to approve the minutes for the February 7, 1989t meeting meeting as amended. All voted in favor. Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989... .:.. ...3:.::>::: STATE REPRESENTATIVE W SRABE W,."C LEGISLATIVE COORDINATOR LI8 HITT WaR►L DISTRICT 38 Margaret Schreiner of tbe"`!letropolitan Council gave a brief presentation. State Representative Art Seaberg presented a brief legislative update on property taxes, crime, drugs and environment. Liz Witt, LMC Coordi-a-at:t;dsrisnted a document with property tax recommendations (Seep:<?:::::: Mayor Ellison asked Repreaetativ.Seaberg what the City could do to make the tax burden fair@;::..Repeentative Seaberg responded that the City should let t#:pa�afi}: be known. KATIE OPATRNY/EAGAN FIRE PBEVRNTIOM POSTER WINNER Chief Southorn recognized Katie Opatrny, Eagan's Fire Prevention poster winner, and stated she had received an honorable mention in the State Wide Fire Prevention Poster Contest. OF Councilmember Egan for a new candidate and Council. MANAGEMENT 3ARB AGUE City should readvertise make recommendations to the Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to accept the letter of resignation of Barb Agne from the Water Quality Management Committee and seek a replacement by advertising for applications for the position. All voted in, favor, ............... Item A. Personnel It. 1. Clerk/typist. a. Maintenance Facility Clerk/typist. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Cristina Marlette subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirement. b. Police and Fire Department Clei:X;(typist. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Bradt}:se.:mer and Patricia Peterson for clerk/typist positions in .'.#;e:::aiii fire departments, subject to the successful completion. of-trie Cf�tyTs' physical examination requirements. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUT:::::: ........:.:::E$... . February 21, 1989::::`••':=::E::::a:. 2. Street/Equipment l S ntenance 4k kkera. It was recommended to appr-weA a hiring of Dean Robinson and William Hoium for street/equipment division maihtenanoe positions, subject to successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. 3. Contract Recyclin It was recommended to apprt" thO-5::30ontract with Kris Hagemann as a recycling specialist for the.f4ty. X. Item B. It was recommended to approve the plumbers and water softener licenses as presented. Item C. Proiect 519. Final Acceptance (Town Centre Street Lights) It was recommended to "alit ti tke:.;the final acceptance of Project 519 (Town Centre - Street It Project hearing was recommended to receive th 527 (Lexington Square - Storm to be held March 21, 1989. final assessment roll for Sewer) and schedule a public Item E. Project 519.:.geo di' e:.gi.nal•.Assessment Rol /Order Pu Hearing (Town CentreE__:iil:r::: It was recommended to receive the::fjnal assessment roll for Project 519 (Town Centre - Street:::Light-A) and schedule a public hearing to be held on March 21, -1*09. AdditionItem F. Contract 89-02. Re It was recommended to receive the;.U.Lds for Contract 89-02 (Clearview Addition - Streets) and awa#*the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, McNamara Contractififin the amount of $80,542.00. It was recommended to receive the -Bids for Contract 89-04 (Timberline and Well No. 1 - Inspection and Repair) and award contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Layne Minnesota in amount of $27,677.00. the the Page 4/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 It was recommended to approve the resolution restricting parking on Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. It was recommended to rece1, !p thcfj*.�P.Ids for Contract 88-32 (Well No. 12 - Pumphouse and the contract to the 'ffglbW--.N-&lders, Inc. in the amount of lowest responsible bidder $2418000.00. Item J. It was recommended t6i."iftpg.ove the plans and specifications for Contract 88-28 (Fire Parking Lot Improvements) and authorize the advertisement to be held at 11:00 a.m., Thursday, March 16,, 1984:* Wachter moved, Gustaf ....ft .. d the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda presented and authorize their implementation. All voted * -'in favor. PROJECT 531/LRXINGTDN AVENUE (STREETS & UTILITIES) Public Works Director.To.m.Cglbert introduced the matter to the Council. A representative.��. 4. introduced and explained the nature of the improvement'*'pi*61*ii-di:::::*::iW::::iiiE'*ated it was expected the project would begin at the compift--ion 0;E -.-'the Pilot Knob project and that the through traffic would W.*.'Aeto&*d onto Pilot Knob. He also stated that the cross traffic wo'U-;d be�:""'*intained. Mr. Colbert further explained the easement acquisitins. Bob Rosene presented the utility improvements associated with the project. He also presented the proposed assessment rates and showed the areas of assessment on overhead exhibits. Councilmember Egan had questions "arding the assessments for certain areas. Mr. Colbert_,*.VLA#e. d.- .....t4g..assessments for those areas. Mr. Rosene explained cost sharing for the project. Mr. Colbert stated a water stud' was being conducted to measure the effect of the project. Bill Hanson, 3876 Westwood Lane, was concerned regarding the lowering of the road bed in his location. He also had concerns Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 regarding noise. Mr. Colbert: jtated thai:-;.kbe road bed would not be significantly lowered. Mr. H$ ap:...c gq i ried the location of the bike trail. Be asked how far from taty line would work be done. Be also questioned where the utiliiiii:46uld be located. Mr. Colbert stated an additional five feet would be acquired for the right-of-way. Lisa Goulet, 3590 B1 Public Works Director Tom Richard Weinberger, 3707 sole assessment on his side of acquired. Public Works Direcic the unique drainage on the p his side of the street. He fur notified of acquisitions. w assessments worked. the assessment process. Way `':.questioned why he was the :reef; He asked if land would be albi�t reported that because of #Ea:fo$s the sole assessment on :a£ed that the owners would be Mayor Ellison questioned if the County would have any neighborhood meetings. Mr. Colbert stated no. Mayor Ellison observed that perhaps it should be do#te::1n, the future. Mark Simpson, 3980 Lexingt assessed twice. He informed the exceeded past assessments. Publ commented that he would resea;c discrepancies. He stated that.*.' 6640i:8outh, claimed he was cil:,tAmt the current assessment iCS'ector Tom Colbert ::8iatter and resolve any ojects had different costs. Jim Ruhe, 3708 Falcone Way, asked who determined what ponding areas were to be drained. Mr. Colbert stated it depended on the nature of the pond. John Thiele, 3692 Falcois+i£?RtiR�d the Council that the developer had told him that :'a33-' =assas:�neIits were paid when he purchased his house. He stated the ftilderx broke many promises. He felt the improvements were not need anc6tated that he could not afford the assessments. Mr. Colbert::--:atatid* that his assessment was $890.00, not $10,000.00. "" Lucille Webster, 4030 South Lexington, questioned the need for a bike path. She had concerns regarding the drainage and suggested that the trails be year round. Mr. Colbert stated that the erosion could be cleaned up. Councilmember Gustafson eigained why the City does not maintain the trails year round. Mike Bolling, 3856 West#i t�.*ji:%�e fti l d the road level. He had concerns regarding safety and**`-''rei#iiested"a':barrier. Be asked what affect there would be on the landscaping♦:?.A representative from Bonestroo explained the landscaping. Putchea Labino, Homeowners' Association representative, asked why all of the lots weren't listed under the assessments. Mr. Colbert Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINOTE,$,:::::::.,:,.;, February 21, 1989 stated that single family': idents.Y�j�e not being assessed for the road improvements unless tlYeji: d <s jkt access. He further stated that others had pre -paid. Ms:" k€iia questioned the assessment method. Mr. Colbert explained the assessment method. Ms. Labino requested postponement on a decision regarding the matter. Luella Seech, 4040 SoutJA.Jexington,, objected to the bike path and asked how close the b��F?�::...... * property lines. Mr. �l�s#k#�#t be to pe ty Colbert stated there was AO`'Ba;:N an but that they could not be inside of the property lines. :... Joe Raspi, 3579 Bluejay,::r sti0. why the improvement was not all done at one timeHe h. ;::woi arn;� ` egarding the assessments and noise. He felt the wideniiiq was noo-'necessary at the present time. Councilmember McCrea explained that Eagan was still 458 undeveloped and that growth must be anticipated. Mr. Colbert stressed that the money was not available to complete the project all at one time. City Attorney James Sheldon explained the legal aspects of assessments. Paul Larson, 3635 Blii. y :;had concerns regarding the ponding and the water outlet. Mr. CoYtieltated they were only proposed locations. Mark Haze, 3609 BluejaeGEriiied the grade of Duckwood and Lexington. Mr. Colbert sta'1i►8s lowered about 6 feet. Bob Warneke, 3945 Westbury, questioned the lighting, speed limit and crosswalks. Mr. Colbert stated that lighting was installed only at major intersections, that the Department of Public Safety determined the speed limit and that crosswalks were not practical. Mr. Warneke questioned if;t-JAe4.landscaping. Mr. Colbert stated none was planned. John Winter, 3557 Bluejay, gg.estip d the assessment method and stated he wanted Duckwood to remote opO He felt the entire project should have an area assessment. ... Sean Simpson asked if medians would be installed. He had concerns regarding the curb. Mr. Colbert stated that medians would not be installed. Elaine McCarthy-Pietsch had conte@ regarding the speed limit. Councilmember Wachter stated the City pbnld approach the State. Councilmember Egan explain 4:;L:zhf:4eed was based on the density of the area also. Councilmember Wachter questioned t. ure signal preparation and asked how long the water main would be= Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 there could be any deviatft#from they: nterline. The engineer stated no. Egan explained the tra :Ef1. :e}s.C.eM.-.. d questioned if one side would be adequate. Mayor Ellison gi$tr''if there would be completion penalties. The engineer stated.i4 (buncilmember Wachter had concerns regarding the construction impact on the City. Councilmember McCrea felt there should be informational meetings as the project progresses. Mr. Colbert stated it was hard to draw limits. Councilmember McCreaE installed underground. Mr. Co cost participation. McCrea su only and recommended the east the assessment rates. Mr...C,el. derive the rates. McCrea ui:g�: safety of the bike trails." the power lines could be i3 there would probably be construction on one side questioned the difference in ned various methods used to tion of the community on the Mayor Ellison stated the project was needed because of the expansion in Eagan and that this particular area was the fastest growing area in Eagan. Councilmember Gustafgiaxi input and informed them that He stressed that the Council developers and salesmen misr communication was an on-goio, problem could not be handl ed.he appreciated the community dk:.could reassess the path needs. 1SStiensng to the public. He stated assessments. He felt that W"And stated that the speed of improving the roads. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 531 (Lexington Avenue — Streets & Utilities) -and authorize the execution of the related Joint Powers Agreement. All voted in favor. PROJECT 533/Di#ft8 :1=.'{$glERTS i UTILITIES) Public Works Director Tom Cft�bert'f#)troduced the project to the Council. Bonestroo presented the::$etailJj.:;of the proposed project and stated that the completion date iia8 ezp"i�ted around October 1, 1989. Bob Rosene presented the utility changes that were involved in the project. He reviewed the estimated costs and the proposed assessments. Dan Gustafson, Stratford Oaks, reousted the preservation of the trees in the construction of, the..BFoject.. Mayor Ellison questioned if the County was expanding tkie:.iCiititfly in the area. Mr. Colbert stated yes and that the only ilii iiistiiie'-was a retaining wall. There was much discussion concerning that pocg on of the roadway. Councilmember Wachter stated the tree cQii stions should be evaluated. Mayor Ellison questioned if the developer would cost share with the City. The developer stated they would take it under consideration. Mr. Colbert informed the Council that Ron Cornwell approved of the Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989........ . . .."*"'***"' ...... project. There was discuson regar the assessment policy for the trailways. Egan moved, Wachter secoif hearing and approve Project 533 (D and authorize the execution of the All voted in favor. motion to close the public y Road - Streets & Utilities) ted Joint Powers Agreement. ftUTION CONTRACT City Administrator Tom Bed0s updAfed the Council on the matter, Mayor Ellison questioned if the*f4i ..werq::jiother bids. Mr. Hedges stated there was only one, from 4k..:. ated it was a potential conflict of interest anditati as a higher bid. Be also informed the Council that the tire". cost was covered by the County. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a contract with John F. Luoma and Associates to provide services related to the distribution of curbside recyclable containers. All voted in favor. DANIEL ERDAW.-ft-ft-ZARD SETBACK VARIANCE City Administrator Tom Edges 1nf.49-rmed the Council an application had been submitted b -.-:D&&i&::Erdman for a 2.15 foot variance to the 5 foot side:-:-y:gK-.;.K:i:set ck. Councilmember Wachter questioned how such a disOK-Mis ..V -ndy could occur. Community Development Director Dale Runkle statia"it was difficult to tell. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve a 2.15 foot variance to the 5 foot side yard setback for Daniel Erdman located on Lot 1 Block 2c Sunset First Addition, subject to all Code requirements. All voted i **'b*%... mt"ftm PROJECT 543R/PZTITION/ZAN PO$:: KYLXXX ROAD - SIBLEY HILLS DRIVE Community Development Direc�pr D4. -Runkle introduced the petition to the Council. Michael J. Sullivan, representative for the petitioners, stated the City's report gave rise to the EM requirement. Be disputed several areas of the final report and stated he intended to file an appeal to the District Court. He reque"ed a meeting be arranged to discuss alternatives. Mayor Ellison asked meet before any further action was taken Community"two'ef "0pm6ft*-`Director Dale Runkle responded that K was near the end of :Me time frame. Councilmember Egan suggested that the Council could '&hy the EAN request and that staff could work with the neighbors. Councilmember Wachter bad questions regarding the water wheel. Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES t .......:::::::::.:::::::.. February 21, 1989 Marilyn Murray questfV'Md which ::#;tees would be lost. She had concerns regarding the anii&*:Aa# tk#:::area. Mr. Colbert stated that the design was not completed''*auss%iraE` at the present time he was unable to state which trees might be lost. Councilmember Gustafson stated that the animals would need to adapt to the change. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to deny the preparation of an environmental asses •:'tn 7t6 .: for Project 543E (Skyline Road - Sibley Hills Drive "1an*d::fi,_:1ftft sat staff to work with the neighbors to mitigate the impac , th:1#: roject. All voted in favor. VARIAXCE/BUILDIH(} $$TBAC� POR SIGNAL BANK City Administrator T(W'-:g'eg%%i marized the need for the variance to the Council. Community Development Director Dale Runkle updated the Council on the background regarding the proposed project. John LeMay informed the Council that the only encroachment was the canopy and that the hardship was the traffic. Councilmember Gustafson questioned if there was a::Aged for six drive-throughs. Mr. LeMay stated that six drive-thrarfg�,�8.Vere needed. Gustafson moved, Egan se�nndid" :j:*ifte motion to approve a ten foot variance to the 50 foot building setba?i1:14for Signal Bank located at Lot 1, Block 1, Town Centre 1:1}L1:.::-29 -::18@�tion. All voted in favor. NARGELE OUTDOOR AD!V.&M- SING/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A BILLBOARD ADVERTISING SIGN Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to continue the matter regarding the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. toallo ..a.:!AQ;; fAf?k.: � W" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2 :aid::::$:.+l Industrial Acres, to the March 7, 1989, City Councll�meetimgF''pgisuant to the request of the applicant. All voted in favor. TOWN CENTRE 100 7TH iJ� City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the item to the Council and stated that the APC recommended approval of the application. Community Development Director Dal& Rankle summarized the project for the Council. Charles Bartholdi infaae4ck.Se; £toil he was available for questions. He stated traili(sag:#[d#;ieti:8lks were proposed and the developer would prefer bituminous surface to concrete. He stated the developer would prefer to keep the trail� outside of O'Leary Park. Councilmember McCrea requested more information regarding the retaining walls. Public Works Director Tom Colbert furnished further detail regarding the retaining -walls and pointed out their location. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 X Mayor Ellison stressed theLxhe , i cess3.ty-ft*,*'a good job being conducted because of the nearby Councilmember Egan had questions regardingtheconstruction materials. Mr. Colon stated the project would be constructed with brick, limestone and stucco. Mayor Ellison had qu development. Mr. Colon a would be no heavy trucks. Councilmember Gustafson q ition ,..:if nineteen conditions. Councti a conditions. Councilmember': the types of uses in the office uses and that there there were seventeen or responded nineteen Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat for Town Center 100 7th Addition consisting of two lots and an outlot on 19.5 previously zoned LB acres within the Town Centre 100 Planned Development, as submitted by Federal Land Company, subject to the following i 0 .tions - 1. These standard conditi'o`h**#**:':a-::-:P.1at approval as adopted by Council action on September 1,1981- she 21 be complied with: Al. Bly V B2l B4l Cl, C2r C48 D11 Ell '%"'" 2. All trash shall within the building. 3. The landscaping shall be increased along the southern property line adjacent to the park and by the southwestern parking stalls. 4. A 201 wide trail .:-A.:;Kced along the easterly X.. property line. 5. The developerr, in conjuniftion V#.#h the easterly property owner, be responsible in providi#q a d6rth/south 81 wide bituminous pathway from Town Centre Drive to the i"posed eight foot east/west bituminous pathway. 6. This development shall construct an 81 bituminous trailway from the west boundary of this development to the proposed trail system located within the Waterford Ap.. "-.J .J:ment Development to the east. 7. The developer is i .4-.- it'" .... i�* d iipoj pon an eight foot bituminous trail to O'Leary Park from '*il'iii"-*-*pi6p;6iiid-'i!ight foot east/west bituminous trail. This north/south tr4$-3::.link be field staked and approved by the City's Landscape Archi'tapt prior to installation to insure compatible linkage to O'Leary Pa . rk pedestrian system. Page ll/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 `:::•`:: 8. A five foot wide pal be::eced along the south side of the Town Centre Drive from'* :.eat:`.0.4 ry of this development to the nortb/south sidewalk aliifit:#`itast boundary of the site. 9. All signage shall be subject to the one-time fee of $2.50 per square foot. 10. All mechanical eq AV:)?.3�, #e: enclosed or concealed by materials similar to the matPrfalie riff'- outside of the building. 11. Direct surface water di.$:G arge.-.4nto the existing 120 trunk storm sewer shall be limited toiiibe svirRhwest corner of this site. 12. A storm sewer exterii4`dn sti83 `be stubbed to Outlot A to the west from the existing 180 storm sewer stub in Town Centre Drive adequate to handle potential future flow of 4.0 cf s. 13. A 20' - 30' utility easement shall be dedicated adjacent to the east property line as:::Dgcessitated by the depth of the existing 120 trunk sanitary sewer 3,iiE:::,... 14. Any relocation of ex etc.) shall be designed and requirements. 15. Each newly crea and water service conne ities (hydrants, catch basins, ..-An accordance with City dt- shall have a separate sanitary sewer to the appropriate City utility. 16. The east and west entrance to this development shall have a minimum width of 30' with 25' radii. 17. Adequate cross ea ensure adequate access to 18. The outside of the buil building materials on all four dedicated as necessary to -way. be constructed of the same e building. 19. The developer must submit detailed plans for the retaining walls for staff approval. All voted in favor. OAK CLIFF 3RD ADDITIOMV0.ILININARY PLAT City Administrator Tapk?lt 0.9 s:'pE4 tinted the application to the Council and stated that the APC recommended approval of the project. Community Development Director Daj: :Runkle summarized the application for the Council. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES,.... February 21, 1989 ; : :' :i:+:: :'':...... `. Jim Phillipi (North Sttaic..Engineoik) distributed an agreement whereby the station assessmeti:C: W4a;x--:jOi&ed. Councilmember Egan commented that the assessment-*-*-:iis;ts9::d:`be paid. Councilmember Wachter requested clarification of the assessments. Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained the assessment method. Councilmember Egan asked what the staff's position was on the assessment condition. Mr. Colbert stated that staff felt.. that the condition should stand. The develo r reca :ti::`?::r':':" ?::� : pe ppei!''YiC=: ekt' tory. Councilmember McCrea questioned if $3,000.00 had already be" subtracted. Mr. Colbert stated that the report took the::.S3,000..QD into account. Egan moved, Wachter sss4nQe:motion to continue the matter regarding the preliminary:.- t: (rept') entitled Oak Cliff 3rd Addition as submitted by Robert Schlangen, to the March 7, 1989, City Council meeting, to allow staff to work out the assessment question. All voted in favor. BLUE RIDGE'SBCOND ADDITION/PRRLIMIMMY PLAT City Administrator Tom'Eeiis:pr.a�esented the application to the Council and stated the APC recommettdeti approval. Community Development Director Dale RurkRie inot the Council that the proposal was in conformancerrttte'i'3$nned Development, approved :.-.c Indirect Source Permit and.�iX. ii sive Guide Plan. The developer (L. A. Laukka Development Co.) was available for questions. A brief presentation was given. Councilmember Egan questioned the percentages for office/warehouse. The developer stated a rough estimate would be 50/50 to 60/40. Councilmember McCrea questioned if there would for for truck turn around. The developer stated room. Councilmember Wachter questioned the type and Jpdation_for the retaining wall. The developer detailed the informatiaks regikgoing the retaining wall. Councilmember Wachter requested &tai16.*:;:regarding the drainage. Mr. Colbert updated the Council on tits dra£rtage. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve a preliminary plat entitled Blue Ridge Second Addition for L. A. Laukka Development Co. consisting of three lots on 35.64 Planned Development zoned acres located along Lone Oak Dri". subject to the following conditions: 1. These standard co�t*tt:o:. at approval as adopted by Council action on Sept ember:::::.11 be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C21 C3, C4, C5, Dl, E1.,.F1 and Gl. 2. No parking shall be allowed on' :the public street. 3. Nine feet wide parking stalls shall be provided for employee use on the perimeter of the lot. Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 4. The rooftop mechari.kx:eglli:@?lt shall be screened from the public streets. 5. The fence or landscape edge shall be constructed along the southern lot line and retaining walls for pedestrian safety. 6. No direct storm spdd►►#r::::raaaetto�at will be allowed to the existing 24 inch gravity t i ::0ar. tuitlet for Pond FP -7. 7. The developer will be reeqquired to submit the appropriate retaining wall design documenta:bn fq=::'staff approval prior to final plat approval. All voted in favor. AUTUMN RIDGE ADDITION/RRiONING City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the application to the Council. Community Develo�ent.,Director Dale Runkle summarized the rezoning and the preliminary:::: Xs ; gpplications for the Council. Jim Ostenson (James Deve;topment�):.: informed the Council that the parties were in cooperation ii6d .p :;tstitlti ed the phases of the development. Mayor Ellison_a ::-w= owned the property to the west. The developer responded tiit$:iC:::&jhice Rahn owned the property to the west but that it was not amenable to the roadway going through. Mayor Ellison questioned if the developer had met with Engstrom. The developer stated they had met and that they were in agreement. He further stated that the road to the west was being acquired. Councilmember Wachtel: �ioi 06.4a ..'t ""t the cul-de-sac to Dodd was very long. Councilmember G`iiStalfsoiis Rtioned Engstrom's time table. The developer stated that Engstr.*I s t$#e table was two months behind its time table. Gustafson commentitd tha�:he felt the present cul-de-sac was ok for the firsttase.#. Colbert stated he had no problem with the cul-de-sac in r6§ards:::lb safety. Councilmember Egan mentioned he thought there were slot of lots for the amount of acreage and requested the size of the lots. The developer stated the smallest lot was 12,000 square feet. The developer explained to the Cofticil that it had access to Highway 3 but it was deleted for traffreasons. Councilmember Wachter stated he felt Mr...Jlgr�by..:.vrg44.d...probably not develop his property. Mayor Ellison st .".* }*;:Q>r+.*Oia. & second access as soon as Possible and requested the" dd'i't3an''Cf"a' condition that only phase one could be built until a second acce:at(.:was provided. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded,*1'he motion to approve the rezoning for Autumn Ridge Addition (James Development Company) of 38.6 Agricultural acres to R-1. All voted in favor. Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 r : ......... McCrea moved, Egan s-- do, the�@otion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of 99 lots':-1-`%pataer3, L of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road, known as Autumia::Aadition (James Development Company), subject to the following"conditions: ' 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, B1, B2 , B3 , B4 , Cl , C2 , C3 , CT. ;g;:X1-:::::d G1. 2. Development must have agimss to .the property from Dodd. 3. Phase two of the develp fent &41. 1 not be constructed until a second access to the develpt�fdivided. All voted in favor. 5-2" B UNISYS Jerry Tank requested tiiak;e:;;trailway assessment be removed as it's removal was necessary for, time:*". 4. of the semi -conductor building. City Administrator tom Hedgeg:;:�eported that the trailway was never assessed. City Attoaey:::as Sheldon informed the Council that usually there was a neeAi::::a"project in order for the City tc assess. Wachter moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve the waiver for the trailway assessments for a trail along Pilot Knob Road in regard to Unisys Park. All voted in favor. Betty Bassett requested the;:&larif�:oation of the Eagan request to the MWCC. Public Works Direct&tiTom:-'b A bert briefly explained the option and the disposal station ilke. Ms. Bassett stated she felt the agreement considered Eagan a dumping spot and had further complaints regarding the matter. She requested the Council reconsider the matter. John Wesley, 1747 Bluebill Drive, :t ¢marked that Seneca did not accept the municipal sand and grit at t present time and questioned the delay. He requested the.;gtdaa;u;t# development contract and reiterated his complaints.: pif is ►:;bev�lopment Director Dale Runkle responded that the contracf�'rras��awaifirig.agency review. Councilmember Wachter stated that. a proposal would help the City of Eagan. Betty Bassett opposed the -regional sand and grit collection. Page 15/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1989 Mayor Ellison stated thex.-*0# 'd i;'-6ontinue to vigilantly watch out for the citizens' Mike Hazel, 2129 Silver Belly stated that he understood the project was just a concept. Public Works Director Tom Colbert replied that the matter would be brought back to the Council when the proposal was concrete. ............... SOUTH NETk4.*.TASK-' RCE Gustafson moved, Egan seconoid-� the;.i*.jiction to authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to:4knt;4k-'ii1-i ' t..q.,04' Joint Powers Agreement with the South metro Task Pd*)'t'iii�---f-br::i 'All voted in favor. IBM COPY MACHINE Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to declare the IBM copy machine as surplus props ... Fty and sold to Dr. Schell of Altura, Minnesota, for a high bid o4 ---'.*.-*.,#.4 .00. All voted in favor. McCrea moved, Gustafson matter regarding the massage Council meeting. :-motion to continue the the March 21, 1989, City WORK SESSION MEETING Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a work session meeting for March 28,:.1.989.,1... at 7:00 p.m. to discuss strategic planning objectives. All vo COUNCIL I>T.BCUSSPPS The Council was informed that:...kbe TdIefson lawsuit depositions would be taken during the week of Peibruajf.27, 1989. The Council was reminded of the Chamber of Commerce luncheon to discuss TIF. 'k Public Works Director Tom Colbert requested the council respond to his department regarding the signal ai-.-.-'--Alackhawk and County Road 30. He questioned if the Co signal installed at that location or another. V"Mr Councilmember Wachter questioned if:..*.*.tbe Cityput fuel out on bids. Public works Director Tom Colbert ted yes but not on a yearly basis. Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCITA.)tTNUTE February 21, 1989 Councilmember Wachtei:-.4-0uested:--:YjA:-addition of an amendment to * ... q........ t the Autumn Ridge Addition i" h Va school needed better bus access. Councilmember McCrea'"out that there were two separate parcels for two separate owners. Mayor Ellison requested staff to check with the School District as soon as possible. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the conditions regarding the Autumn piece should be worked out before they cOqROL.--.bef.pre.-tbLe Council. Mayor Ellison stated 'a'*e"'*t****e"*'7."*V.'*091"d**'-"*kl**'W-'*:, a closed session following the Council meeting to discuss OfidingMtigation. Egan moved, Wachtero . i i ded,,*:. th *. e - motion to approve the checklist dated February 20,, 1989, in the amount of $1861,796.07F and the checklist dated February 21,, 1989, in the amount of $667,855.23. All voted in favor. Upon motion duly made 6Y'Vii n, seconded by Wachter, the meeting was adjourned at 12:1a... a.... !.voted in favor. E. J. VanOverbeke — City Clerk We believe the report mak Legislature for improving recommendations of the re • State funding for proper' annually to keep pace wit increases in tax burdens. suggestions to the party tax structure. Rey programs should increase and to prevent rapid * -The difference between tax burdens for low value homes and high value homes should be narrowed and property tax burdens for business property, no amential property and apartments should be doeeE=;:::: * Homeowners' property tax stat"ents sLould accurately reflect property tax relief paid for thepata. + Funding for transition 3d (!he'`i9ig2ecement for the homestead credit program) and other property tax relief money should be reallocated to achieve desired taxpayer outcomes. These property tax relief funds could be distributed through the following types of programs: 1. a homestead rel to homeowners; 2. a new tax base e ability of local 3. a local aovernme that provides relief directly that equalizes the nce services; and * Disparity reduction aid amounts should be grandfathered as provided for under current law. The League Coordinating Committee wi legislative session. The Iati.:33pRz the Coordinating Committee ..report �•itll 1989 data when it becomes availab3:s. inue to meet during the 's and Horgan prepared update the report with If you would like further information al."t the project or have questions or comments on any of t13e rec4ftendations, please contact any member -of the Coordinating Committee (list attached) or Laurie Fiori Hacking at the League. I t ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULARCITY COUNCIIx NEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA MARCH 6,, 1989 DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Project 561, Receive PetitionJOrder Feasibility Report (Sterns Addition - Streets and btil ties) Item '2. Consider Petition to Vacate Public Right -of -Way (Egan Avenue - Vlas Lane to Pilot Knob ,Road) MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILIUMERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: MARCH 6, 1989 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Project 561, Receive Petition/Order Feasibility Report (Sterns Addition -Streets 8 Utilities) --Staff has received a petition from the Rosemount School District and two adjacent developers requesting the preparation of a feasibility report for the installation of streets and sewers to service the proposed Sterns Addition which is the site of the new elementary school along Dodd Road. With the petition incorporating adequate guarantees for all costs to be incurred, it is the staff's recommendation that the Council authorize the preparation of this feasibility report. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the petition for Project 561 (Sterns Addition -Streets 6 Sewers) and authorize the preparation of a feasibility report. Item 2. Consider Petition to Vacate Public Right -Of -Way (Egan Avenue-Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) --Several years ago when Pilot Knob Road was reconstructed to its present four lane urban design, the angles intersection of Egan Avenue was reconstructed to a new location south of Vilas Lane. The old alignment was subsequently obliterated and abandoned. It would be appropriate to consider formally vacating this excess public right-of-way through the formal public hearing process. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To schedule a public hearing to vacate public right-of-way (Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) for April 4, 1989. ISI Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator MINUTES OF REGULO'.MEETING OF A regular meeting of the E March 7, 1989, at 6:30 were Mayor Ellison and CouiYd'111i McCrea. Also present were City Director Tom Colbert, Community City Planner Jim Sturm, Assista City Attorney James Sheldon.,:.;::::::: ff 1989 RAGAN CITY COUNCIL n City Council was held on Tuesday, :•:yaa_Municipal Center. Present er f:::fttiter, Egan, Gustafson and inis.rator Tom Hedges, Public Works veloment Director Dale Runkle, hgineer Mike Foertsch and City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended continuing Item C under the Consent Agenda (License, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, Pulltabs at.Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South Robert Trail) to the Marchii:: -11....1989, City Council meeting. Wachter moved, McCrea seCoiide :?;t'he motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favoi:5 February 21. 1989. Mayor Ellison requested the change on page 1, paragraph 4, correcting the name to 'Mike Michou•. Councilmember Egan requested the correction from Bonestroo representative to Dakota County :S}.ghway.:Department representative, Dave Zeck, on pages 4 and`::::;:?:::::;::<:::::::::: McCrea moved, Wachter secon&.d, tkitE:motion to approve the minutes for the February 21, 1989 `regq.'j r Council meeting as amended. All voted in favor. RESOLUTION/FULL TRANSFER OF THE STATE'S MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TO THE HIGHWAY USER TAX DISTRIBUTION FUND Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch introduced the matter to the Council. Wachter moved, Egan seco.nd d:,.:..tb.e.:motion to approve the resolution to allow full tib; s �...X. �:>:#�t�;:State's motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tas'd sE'fib"utiori fund. All voted in favor. Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 POLICE.WPARTSENT RffikANISATION Chief of Police Pat 6iAgan repot" l to the Council regarding the reorganization request. Coni:# .memh**' tgan asked if a balance would be maintained between the two�eiiants. Geagan responded yes. Egan requested a clarification regarding the administrative secretary. Mayor Ellison asked if this would achieve the Police Department's goal of constant supervision. Geagan responded yes, on paper. Wachter moved, Gustaf# tt 4#lQiR.j... :the motion to approve the reorganization of the Police"tYegttm'Eri: structure as presented. All voted in favor. DEPART D.TES City Administrator Torii $ ges:*V' 'i] a thank you letter from the O'Patrany grandparents. Chief Southorn informed the Council that the Eagan Fire Department was involved in controlling the NSP Black Dog fire. John Hohenstein dist f ted -hats from the recycling firm and stated the public response 'wa:s:�Ikaiitastic. Councilmember McCrea questioned where the containers were::Tef.t. Mr. Hohenstein stated they should be at the doorstep. Item A. 1. Clerk/typist positions. a. Full-time clerk/ to approve the hiring of completion of the City's tration. It was recommended a subject to successful tion requirements. b. Half-time clerk/typist iiif::Commuiii.ty Development. It was recommended to continue the hiring::for :'the position until the March 21, 1989, City Council meeting. c. Half-time clerk/typist in Parts Department. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Nancy Hammel subject to the successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. Item B. Plumbers L.;ce kt::.1-:..— It was recommended to approve the,$.:plumbing licenses and 1 water softener license as presented. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Item C. It was recommended to City Council meeting. item to the March 21, 1989, - -r,_ - Z-TsT- FU m- -.. It was recommended to::e8g p�e;;.an--s endment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Resta:iraiit:::m:;i a new manager (Judy Johnson, 1400 47th Avenue, Colum #a eet:ghts). Item E. Ex - Storm Sewer). It was recommended to continue'"indef initely the scheduled final assessment hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer). Item F. It was recommended tore Project 487R (Braun Court - S public hearing to be held on Item G. he final assessment roll for Storm Sewer) and schedule a It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll for Project 518 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and order the public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. Item H. Maintenance 1filfZ j; J'* 10's?>>1; : A R ov Secs/Authorize Ad for Bids (Miscellaneous n**arii3`i4ttachmentsl . It was recommended to approvie the:' cifications for Maintenance Vehicle No. 125 (Miscellaneous E(;lpaaen*;;and Attachments) and authorize the advertisement for d"'bid o'sening to be held at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 1989. Item I. Contract 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Streets and Storm Sewer). It was recommended to approve the third and final payment for Contract 88-06 (Braun Court;:.- Storm Sewer) and accept the project for perpetual mainiitce:::::::::i:::::::: It was recommended to apple s ;phi fifth and final payment for Contract 88-12 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. Item R. It was recommended to a Contract 87-32C (Chapel Hill accept the project for perpe ;•-.11 cond and final payment for treets and Utilities) and nce. It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989.::::::.._._. Item M. It was recommended to ap:&.we.::::tb�'-Looperative Power Association Lease Agreement for South kl:e :::: X;61d 'D" (Fire Station No. 3) and authorize the Mayor and Cy"Clerk to execute all related documents. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda items as amended and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. DRUG ANA#B[iR :`ItlBS' STi1l�CB EDUCATION City Administrator Tom Hedgq* infckk-Ued the Council that staff was considering a program for fi��h 9raiig drug education to be conducted by the Police Officers,...:,:,: Chief of Police Pat Geagan explained the program which would consist of one hour per week for 17 weeks. He stated the course was very structured and that there was a training program involved. The Lions Club would pay for the travel expenses. Be further stated that January of 1990 was the soonest the pr am could begin. Councilmember McCrea there should be grant money available for the payment ir::;ttis:;ti*aea;>`She felt there should not be duplication on different levels and tha*t;:the program should be coordinated. She stated the children's::4.-'iew point should not be overlooked. Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 19.69 Mayor Ellison felt thye'-money woulff-%be was a very worthy endeavor;:::;_. Councilmember Gustafson' tat.-t"re every year to add hours to curi*eifr'um. He needed. well spent as the program was tremendous pressure felt the program was City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council no action was necessary on the matter. PROJECT 546/CEDARVALE BMI KVARfY iSTREET IMURFACIM) Assistant City Engineer MikeFoerte:.ch updated the Council on the matter. Bob Freegard (OSM) presented the details of the feasibility report to the Council. He reviewed the location, structure of pavement, repairs needed and the overlay. Be reported that the project would provide uniform width and he outlined the storm sewer improvements. He showed the assessment areas and presented the estimated cost. Councilmember Egan questi:dri6tT;::th;*:Storm sewer improvements. Mr. Freegard described the nature;pf the.iicplovements. Councilmember Wachter questioned the change -.0 west end. Mr. Freegard described the changes. Councilmember Gustafsdii asked why the north properties were not assessed. Mr. Freegard stated those properties had their own service road. Mr. Gustafson stated the other properties also had a service road. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch informed the Council that those service roads were part of the gas station property and that it was a private access drive:;a1y:;::;::':;:: Councilmember Egan questionc#Q:::the J -:QB contingency. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that:teconstsuction had more unknowns than new construction. Councilmember Gustafson indicated that Rahn Road should also be upgraded. Councilmember McCrea concurred and stated that Rahn Road was in bad shape. Public Works Director Tom Colbert pointed out that the neighboring residents opposed a past proposal to upgrade Rahn Road. Assistant City Enginepz-..X ke:•:;Faer.tsch emphasized that the assessments were consistent" ;sik.;::':'8:::ptctices. ..........?a ... McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve Project 546 (Cedar401-e Boulevard — Restoration/Resurfacing) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. All voted in favor. Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 VACATE DRAIRAGE AIiS:.:RTILITY EA$i!lBNT (LOT 158, BLOCS 11, �R�lSADS) Assistant City Engineer Milte4�ertsch supplied the information regarding the petition for the Council. He informed the Council that the petitioner requested a two-week continuance of the matter to further review the landscaping. Mayor Ellison questififie8*'t�ii"' aff�i"t that would have on the Council action. Mr.Foertsch stat;" theg.j_would be no effect. Councilmember Egan commented that._the mdtter should not be continued. McCrea moved, Egan seMA4ft;r the:::*0tion to close the public hearing and approve the va 1166h a#` a drainage and utility easement for Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. VACATE A PORTION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY (HERITAGE LANE - HORTH.;QF YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) Assistant City Enginee'r'''�MZL-ie.:;gpertsch furnished an update on the matter for the Council. Egan moved, Wachter seco#(tled;;::`mo tion to close the public hearing and approve the va_gai 4i:: f portion of street right-of-way (Heritage Lane - North of :"."'"A 6b Doodle Road), and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. AWARD CONTRACT/LEXINGTON AVENUE - RESERVOIR (CONTRA%::.:$-24/RAOJBCT 538A) City Administrator Tom "Hid. ggsetdit-itized the background on the matter. City Attorney Jim Sheldor}::`infoi�jgd the Council that a verbal commitment had been received fro�m:;'the f.f ie insurance company and that the matter could be closed iiixt week. Assistant City Engineer informed the Council that the City couA* proceed with the contract award. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to award Contract 88-24 (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) to Brown..Tank Minneapolis of Eagan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to Eeecute all related documents. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PBR0Y$6: QD'1'DOOR ADVERTISING SIGN City Administrator Tom Hedges intr;Gduced the item to the Council and stated that the APC recommended dei4iil of the application. Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Community Developmen application and stated th Administrator Tom Hedges stricken and could be add asked for a review of the Hedges stated that a plat action. McCrea stated she ,...Director Dale Runkle summarized the of tbti<:::sign exceeded criteria. City it it d;; thez0jRstanding obligations should be d''a:;ritYe date. Councilmember McCrea rules•iegarding financial obligations. Mr. or a waiver of plat is the triggering felt the City should be consistent. Arthur Dean (Naegele )::iCGe]::ttid the site meets the criteria of the present sign ordinaiieev'..ft-isitat�& he felt the size of the sign was an issue but that the Cound-I..:had 4w owed larger signs in the past. He explained that the size.:.of the -sign was an industry standard. He submitted a list ai:':.tagazi :iiiivertisers who have used Naegele signs and stated ..allow advertisers to move about. Councilmember Egan questioned if the height of the sign met City Code. Mr. Runkle stated yes. Mr. Egan pointed out that the Council had previously discussed the location of freeway signs and questioned if this sign met that cri"ria. Mr. Runkle stated yes and that it was one of the few sites remahni:iia:•.. Mayor Ellison requested inf*o"tfu�t:'inn regarding the "principle use" concept. Mr. Dean explained tha.::: ?e Eagan ordinance did not have principle use language, :iut:::tt::tkie results were basically the same. He stated that Naegel:g :%o{ vI.d.like businesses to retain the sign. City Attorney Jim Sheldon described Eagan's ordinance and stated that the City had determined that 250 feet was appropriate. Be indicated that if larger signs were requested, standards should be set forth in the Mayor Ellison suggested"'a -r y #-i;+"of_ the billboard ordinance. Mr. Hedges stated he felt that it was;:a goq': point and that it had been about seven years since the ordiiiince wa: Page B/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7#. 1989 billboard advertising sign'; -On On Lot 2, BI0Cik It S & W Industrial Acres, to allow further research W' the billb"id ordinance. All voted in xx - favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN A&* t/PA*K CENTER ADDITION/FRDZPAL LAND CONPAN7 City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that the APC had considered the applicat-jpq -:.*aWftted by Federal Land Company . .M ..... . .. and recommended a denial ati-isive Guide Plan Amendment and rezoning. Community Development Direc!t:dr Da.I-:.i0k.Runkle reviewed the site - ii. ': t plan with the Council and made;:r.LA :6r4q!j3o the BRA Option K. He . .............. informed the Council that '-.t-16n had been reviewed with the City Attorney. Martin Colon (Federal Land Company) announced that he was prepared to give a full presentation if requested by the Council. In regard to the traffic matter., he stated he had met with Sorenson and Colbert and that eventual bably 1991, Cliff Road would be a six -lane road. He stated th'e'�::':06�tivu-ration would be similar to Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Colon explained that.the:::: 0 V ..... r counted all trees in ft* ....... .. excess of 6 inches in width..a 'fee feet tall and that the count was approximately 180. He .-eii%fthe trees were concentrated in the ... .. northwest corner near the senior citizens site. He observed that if the plan proceeded, 200 to 258 of the trees would be saved if the office buildings were installed. He explained that if the BRA plan was approved, up to 338 of the trees could be saved. He reported that . Federal Land Company would:la . ... s when the development was completed. .......... . Councilmember McCrea asked vfhn th;L-.':..:center would open. Mr. Colon stated it would open either when ;he fijkil placement of Cliff Road was completed (about 1991) or whe'h***:.: the terim construction could be accomplished, including the widening afid.%'::signalizing of the westerly access point. He stated this would solve the problem. He announced that the developer would assume the cost of the upgrade. Councilmember McCrea suggested using the Target lot as a prototype for saving trees. Mir. Colon stated the developer was willing to make that commitment. Councilmember Egan es in other areas of the development would be saved. He also questioned what type of interim improvements were needed. Mr. Colon inkiii-med the Council that the developer was willing to pursue any interim options set out by the County and the City engineers. Mr. Egan questioned if it would be an Oeither/oru proposition. Assistant City Engineer responded yes. Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Councilmember McCrea questioned if Federal Land could open earlier if the temporary provisions w :Eg made. MAY> Colon stated yes. Mayor Ellison recommended that the C;i .:;ah.4}7Qd encourage the upgrading as top priority. Councilmember fatii�:ejiiestioned if the County approval was for the two entrances off of Cliff Road. Mr. Colon responded that it was only preliminary. Mr. Foertsch informed the Council that the County had not reviewed the study and would not do so until March 13. Be stated that the 1991 or 1992 upgrade was not official. Councilmember McCrea stiak:�i¢ f i#cil could approve a resolution. City Administrator Redge*0 commented that staff could reprioritize the capital improvements plan. City Attorney Jim Shei ]Qifti: mi* -s:' �4d that it was a sensitive area and that whichever dieeon't`Council went, there would be criticism and perhaps a lawsuit. He informed the Council of two alternatives: I. Obtain additional information and facts regarding use of the entire Park Center site ar;;a'multi-family development. II. 1. Send the CPD Comprehet ive Gu& " Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for;:::;.ev:iE[: 2. Send the west part::5#''Ehe Park Center property to the APC to begin action for rezoning that property to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to prepare the following: a. Resolution amendi,[i.9::;thQ;:.;;pgprehensive Guide Plan. b. Resolution app=ovinij.tfi'e rezoning and entering into the Planned Development Agt.¢ement-:for the eastern part of the property to Commercial:::V.Ianndd Development uses. c. Resolution approving the kiliminary Plat of the eastern part of the property with the western part of the property as shown as an outlot. d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to revO"El Option Agreement with the RRA and Federal Land for acquisition of the eastern part of the property. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 g. Settlement AO'gement for between the City.$t Eagan a of the pond and i i4t,1'... property. . condemnation lawsuit deral Land for acquisition s on the Park Center Mayor Ellison asked how the Metropolitan Council received authority to rezone in Eagan. Mr. Sheldon stated the authority was given by the state legislature and he further explained the history. Councilmember McCrea ..... :'E a she thought the Comprehensive Guide Plan was a gq.. e. She stated the changes in the surrounding land use had not affected Eii'is parcel and questioned how a lawsuit could be generated. Mt`elMgi1 stated that a lawsuit would not mean that the Council :di.d.sitiytl�:i.r�q:Siong. McCrea stated the City had not received a lawsuiks£ezr`quiE0:a while. Councilmember Gustafson questioned that if the Council needed to take a procedure, what assurance would the developer have. He stated he leaned toward the proposed type of development and questioned if the resolutions would cover these concerns. Mr. Sheldon stated that the procedure was consiste3t`*ith the last five Planned Development Agreements and that all pa'*Al�g:e2tQuld understand the position. Mr. Sheldon also comment¢t3 that :120 day limit applied only to the preliminary plat and ttist.;tt?eglicant should agree to the continuance. Councilmember Egan suggested the Council act on only two matters at the present time: (1) recommend change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan; or (2) rezone to Multi Residential. Councilmember Wachter suggested also including sending it to Dakota County. Councilmember Egan q:ies'k3i ..... ie;:Met Council's timeframe. Community Development stated it could be anywhere from 10 to 90 days and ti kt ttF:traffic studies would be reviewed. Councilmember Gustafson questioned:-*3Ehat if the City sent the matter to the Metropolitan Council and it approved, could the City still change its mind. Councilmember Egan stated the record was clearly established and that in 1984, the Council refused rezoning on the basis of excess commercial in Eagan '..Since that time, there has been substantial change in the area. He..:jgtated that the plan is very sensitive and that the developer demonA ated that D -III would be spot zoning. He further stdt€53;::tht.xk►g:;tudy showed that the area is ripe for further retail zoxi ig .: .... Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the iiOUon to: 1. Approve and send the CPD Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Park Center Addition to the Metropolitan Council for review. Page ll/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 2. Send the west part:*ff the Pa Wi tinter property to the APC to begin action for rezoii ;.that..::p.&rty to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to prepae the following: a. Resolution amending the Comprehensive Guide Plan. b. Resolution apptW.fi�g :t.ho:::�o'zoning and entering into the Planned Developmefit` �4�};4!4meii ?::tor the eastern part of the property to Commercial...-'.- ann6*4j::Developnent uses. c. Resolution approviAQ:the ft�eliminary Plat of the eastern part of the props:r:ty:: 4ithxthiii4estern part of the property as shown as an outl16t. d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to revieia:#h executed Option Agreement with the HRA and Federal i is ;€Qi:::;apgaisition of the eastern part of the property. g. Settlement Agreegiat::;sz:::t3tp condemnation lawsuit between the City. gf:::La:g'aii and Federal Land for acquisition of the pond and ut'.:—: easements on the Park Center property. All voted in favor. Councilmember Egan stted,;the.;.sppiicant agrees to continue the preliminary plat applicatii►;i?::::;? Wachter moved, Gustafson sea gded,:he motion to approve a resolution requesting Dakota Couri�y upcade Cliff Road between I -35E and Cliff Center. All voted in fai'pr. PRSLIRINARY PLAT/OAR CLIFF 3RD ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the matter to the Council. Community Development Director::Dale Runkle summarized the application. Assistant City Engineer MFoertsch informed the Council that staff did not recall making:a commitment to the developer regarding unasse6:0-"::;:ft;RatE 33t bligations. Councilmember Egan referenced Tom.Calbert's letter dated March 2, 1988, to Tom Hedges. He stated that.' ie Council alone would make those determinations. Councilmember Wacii er noted that even if staff had made commitments, it would not be binding. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7,, 1989 ........... X., Saul Bernick distribdted a packet"to the Council, including an Affidavit from Greg Soule..Re informedthe Council that Mr. Schlangen 4'otaswe ti""' contested the new special n. K-:$ind believed it was a ...... .. ..... :.' settlement negotiation. He 9*t*ftd::W*-t at no time was anyone aware that such an assessment would ei"ifil-ii-i-C.- He announced that they felt it was a binding agreement. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the owner had a duty to inquire as to the authority.i*i:i::nt::::w..et:tv;cated that the City enters into all agreements through t: :Councilmember Wachter emphasized that every parcel muit."..Pay to financial obligations. Mr. Bernick pointed out thg�"-'Ahey*16d relied on the City's .. _ X...... actions. City Administrato.r.z.-T ..... :.' .... 0*:�Sodge.i%::::Vecapped the procedure for the City requiring availabili4:::,*'tifi*"&*"'rge"'-'g",:,."'*'*'i**. Bernick stated that the assessment was arbitrary. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch commented that the review with Mr. Wobschall was to identify and explain the assessments. Councilmember Egan stated the City would not negotiate on the basis of supposed statements by Wobschall. City Attorney James Mi-624pn.stated that only unimproved property could be deferred. Mr. Bed should either be included or waived. Mr. Sheldon commentedi.ii�,i.E:::i&.*::::.Schlangen must determine what X. - . V... - is owed and who has authority�:*Councilgftber Egan questioned if the Council needed to establish a*.* Sheldon stated it could be waived. Mayor Ellison pointed"'out that the City needed to recover these costs and that a deferment would be a good compromise. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the preliminary plat (replat).jkntit1..ed.Dak.C1iff 3rd Addition consisting of two lots (2.91 acres)acres) located along the west side of Slater Ro'*"'a'-d':':'ii6"u'th-'-'-df."alff Road in the northwest quarter of Section 31, as submittio by.' bert Schlangen, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard conditions of plat*:::.;&Pprova1 as adopted by Council action on September 15,, 19871 shall be complied with: Alf Blo, B2r B4r Clp C2r C4p DI, Elf Fl. and Gl. 2. Lot 1 shall be reviewed by the..City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised submitted for Lot 1 based on current landscape policyV--.-'::-4"---'- -4 ........... Cif.. -prior to the final plat submission. 4. The development is required to:"d a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 5. The development is reiq�ted to.ide sewer and water service to each platted par cell'***" :::::::::::::::::; 6. Subject to a written agreement to allow assessment, the assessible cost shall be deferred and assessed to Outlot B. All voted in favor. Councilmember Gustafson aslie:if peas correct in that the City did not propose assessments at thi:"6ther':*:f6tages. Mr. Foertsch stated he was correct. Mr. Gustafson rep ed th4it:he felt uncomfortable when the City missed it so many timest:i)�.gt:agseed it was a compromise. GENERAL FUND BUDGET AWUSRW&T/DECEMBER 31, 1988 City Administrator Tom Hedges described the adjustments to the Council and stated that the matter could be considered at the work session. Councilmember McCrea a_'_W:::�U:-the legal fees had been under -estimated for 1988. Mr. that lawsuits make up a certain portion of the legal f""s and':ftiither stated that Hauge received all of his payments la:year:;�E+ explained that the transition caused doubling of: 1E31:i3'sta but that the revenue would offset it. McCrea questioned::he 1989 legal fees would also increase. Mr. Hedges stated::t at revenue sources are tight and that the City would need to do tight monthly forecasting. Be informed the Council that the 1989 budget would be monitored closely. McCrea suggested taking a look at the engineering provisions. She requested good projections. She felt there was a need for an in-house policy in regards to contacting consstated that it should strictly be a legal matter M .or L <tii: sOAtact the attorneys. Councilmember McCrea emphasized that.. she:pas not saying that the fees were too high, just recommending taat it:.4b ould be monitored. Councilmember Egan indicated 'f21at ti".* projected budget increased by 408 and that the City should take a look at the matter. He stated that the revenues were not increasing as fast as the expenditures. He felt the City could not count on permits and fees to handle the budget. City Administrator Tom Hedges explaj�ed that 1989 would have upward adjustments to the reventl..,Bg„further explained the budgeting process. Mayor Ellison commented that the City:had a higher contingency amount at the present time. He stated th'4:t;:the City also estimated revenues more liberally and felt that the City should begin to estimate revenues more conservatively. Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 McCrea moved, Egan seeVnded, the.;motion to approve the fiscal 1988 budget adjustments ai-*:: sresented : 1 voted in favor. VARIANCE/BUILDING F '�ILLAUMR INDUSTRIES Community Development Director Dale Runkle briefed the Council on the application. Nick Linsmeier (Plant::': ... if�g�� f.::.f *farmed the Council that the hardship was for fire safely"'reaaijris •�:: explained the layout and the type of product of the industry :-",-'Ile fuz: Page IS/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 CLIFF LAKE GALLERIA SIGN Community Development':iVi-.Xector.-.-W--'i Runkle explained the '** ............. - - - modification to the sign agrW,1;e-*t' 1 stated tated that the City's sign inspector had reviewed the mai�eiffaknd indicated there was nothing which would prohibit consideration of the request. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a modification of the C1 if f :.YA'j(k0-:-( - 1ex.i. .-..-.Sign Agreement to permit the : .. ;aj ....... X -XV.: ... ........ 6 - ocated at Cliff Lake Center pylon sign and a monument...8mIry.: . PX -r. as presented. All voted in favor::;;: COMPREHENSIVE GUIQJC��LAN ANDM=T/RHZONIMQ/ r OUTLOT..*. ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that a letter had been received from the developer requesting a continuance. Rollie Crawford (developer) informed the Council that the developer is seriously rethinking the entire request and would return before the APC if the plao**:.-.changed. Councilmember Egan asked....if" an engineering report. Community Development Directot.: a e. kIe stated that the applicant had requested review without :g.. yor Ellison remarked that the developer should let tbet air its commercial concerns. Mr. Crawford stated the devel.-_Iw a to re-evaluate the entire 0 situation. Councilmember McCrea asked for the length of the continuance requested. Mr. Crawford stated indefinite and reiterated that the developer was willing to go .. back..bafQr.o the APC. McCrea complimented the developer on its attic spa: X IA': the request. Egan moved, McCrea seconded-:-",'. .. the 416tion to continue indefinitely the Comprehensive Guide Plan Ame;ftdment:**a'ad rezoning of 1.4 Agricultural acres to a Limited M"4"sine$W".district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminaiy plai''-':to allow the developer to review the entire request, with the condition that if the plan changes, the matter will be referred back to the Advisory Planning Commission. All voted in favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN A=NDMENT/RBZONING/ PRELIMINARY PLAT/STERNS MbITION/ISD #196 City Administrator TCWftES tf uced the matter to the Council. Community Developiiihi..-Di recior " Dale Runkle stated the architects were available to discuss th'6::bus access issue. Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Kevin Sullivan (Wold:-A-ssociation)......thanked the staff for their consideration in the handij-:4!p, of th **'*:'**-iter and stated he was available for questions. Mayor Ellison asked Mr. Sullivan if he were comfortable with the bus circulation. Mr. Sullivan responded yes. Councilmember Egan questioned if the City had reviewed the matter. Public Works Director Tom Colbert replied that staff had reviewed the matter and was also evaluating the over -flow events and increasing the width of Dodd Road. questioned the access width. Mr. Sullivan explained tDel widt3i2 Mr. Wachter questioned if the parking would be adequate for..,speci-al events. Mr. Sullivan reported that the residential Xr"s miAs.t.- be used and that it is the past practice of the Scholl... ie ::,use residential areas. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from Mixed Residential to Public Facilities (schools)j, as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterns Addition. All voted in favor. Wachter moved, Egan se.>the,motion to approve a rezoning of 16.46 Agricultural acres t ' *.;ft..a P66ilc Facilities district, as submitted by Independent Scho. Distr:i"."'No. .196 - Sterns Addition. All voted in favor. Egan moved, McCrea sopblift'd, the motion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary school located east of Dodd Road and south of Backmore Drive (extended) in the north half of Section 25, as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterns Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard condt--t�- kti�ippr oval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1.0,81"ih - a - 11 be complied with: Al, Bl, B21 B3, B4, Cl, C2, C5, Dl; El aiid. Gl. 2. The development will be i;OquirtO limit post -development phosphorus export levels to pre-developimi-i"eint levels. 3. City staff to review the grading plan and the School District to be required to remove the drainage from the Schramm property. 4. The development will be requir6A..-to submit a landscape plan which defines the boundary of the scho6l':'and the Schramm property. adjoining property owners 5. The School District:ad'J of the discrepancy in the survey. All voted in favor. City Administrator Tom ff ge:?Ipaated the Council on the background of the matter. Councilmember McCrea requested further clarification. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that HUD would only sell the entire parcel. Councilmember Gustaifsiii;st ge.t6d selling the land (for this parcel) but retaining the 'Y3'9"Eftiii�ii+iiy:.pr Daniel Drive. Councilmember Wachter requested t e am#sgnt of acreage being sold. Community Development Director Dale Runkle stated it was approximately 17 acres. Councilmember McCrea* Brad Swenson incurred the legal costs. City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated he was sure there were some costs which were incurred and suggested the Council have the land appraised. Councilmember Egan had concerns regarding title problems. Egan moved, Wachter 6.*ctinded, the motion to give direction to the City staff as follows:`''` :%::::;::.:.>:;:;;... 1. The HUD property located at :tot :southwest corner of Lexington Avenue and Diffley Road is ta:3.;:(ki::oi the reservoir site. 2. The following propEtty'..is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was required and shall be designated surplus and should be appraised for sale as follows: a. The northerly extension of Daniel Drive at Diffley Road to be appraised with the ink*pttq.: sel:x�1s R-1 property. b. The property along the east of Walnut Hills Park of Wilderness Run Road and aised as R-1 or R-2. c. The portion of the previbiisly p posed Soderholm Addition at the northwest corner of Lexington::-A4enue/Diffley Road to be appraised with the intent to sell as R-4 or Commercial. All voted in favor. PROJECT 561/RECEIVE PRTITIOH/ORpBR FEASIBILITY REPORT (STERNS ADDITION - STREEig' AND UTILITIES) Egan moved, Gustafson:" :ecgic%t? C3i:motion to receive the petition for Project 561 (Sterns Addition - Streets and Sewers) and authorize the preparation of a feasibi ty report. All voted in favor. Page 18/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 PETITION TO VACATE PUMIC RIGH',,-t*4AY (EGAN AVENUE - VILAS LAHg': 1}:.: ILQx; i'OB ROAD) Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a public hearing to vacate the public right-of-way (Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) for April 4, 1989. All voted in favor. City Administrator Tom Hedges staLjed the Town Hall Grant was not approved by the state but that country would fund a portion of the move. Mr. Hedges also sta been resolved. sha Bussey water matter had Mr. Hedges referenced his memorandum regarding the Community Center and stated it was a draft only. Councilmember Egan mi to the Council that the City of Chanhassen was utilizingfbt:'ommunity Center. Community Development Di;�gctor..:DQ1:'4rRunkle updated the Council on the Seneca project. Public Works Director.:';!toiu' Colbert presented an update on Dodd Road/494 upgrade. Councilmember Wachter had concerns regarding airplane noise. Councilmember GustafsQit:::askeek €:the Council would conduct a workshop on the referendum iai1 4:::: yds Ellison stated a workshop was scheduled for March 28, 1989,.;Aria that the workshop could partially be devoted to the topi4: Councilmember Gustafson had:::'0'oncei#4 regarding 'discovered assessments° and he stated that they seLqd to come up often and questioned if they could all be found at once. Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained the process. City Administrator.Tom Hedges stated that the City collects what it can. Mayor Ellison commended the Public';[orks Department in the admirable job of clearing the snow at tliE last snow storm. Mayor Ellison stated t'heE'::i.e::drrie-property was looking good and that an ice arena was being propose. Councilmember Egan had concerns r"arding the Council packet for the meeting and stated that he felt the conditions were becoming skimpy. Public Works Director Tom Colbert responded that because of Page 19/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 the recent 3-step process,:::::fit eliminated the necessity of many technical detailed condit!4.nro. WESCOTT GA WT COMDEMMATION Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to settle the Wescott Garden Lots Condemnation. All voted in favor. Wachter moved, Gustafson se%ond, checklist dated February 28, 1989 -in checklist dated March 6, 1989.4.n::the checklist dated March 7, 14::Er"t in favor. AWODRNMEMT he motion to approve the amount of $527,288.53; the nt of $128,278.97; and the nt of $217,512.26. All voted The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk 'THE MORNING AFTER' March 7, 1989 "The Morning After" is an extremely brief report of the action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on March 7, 1989. There are no details reported in this account; however, the action taken by the City Council on each of the agenda items and each of the other business items is reflected. DEPARTMENT HBAD BUS 1. The resolution to allow full transfer of the State's motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tax distribution fund was approved. 2. The reorganization of the Police Department management structure was approved. CONSENT AGENDA ,_ 3. The hiring of Virginia Dicenza as clerk typist for the Administration Department and Nancy Hammel as clerk typist for the Parks Department were approved and the Community Development clerk typist position is continued until the March 21, 1989 City Council meeting. 'O,&W4. The eight plumbing licenses and one water softener license were approved as presented. (Tpo 5. The gambling license application of the Minnesota Valley Exchange Club �^— for sale of pull -tabs at Richard's Food and Liquor was continued to the March 21, 1989 City Council meeting. �-L 6. An amendment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Restaurant to reflect the new manager was approved. 1 C _ 7. The final assessment hearing for Project 527, Lexington Square - storm sewer was continued indefinitely. 8. The final assessment roll for Project 487R, Braun Court - streets and storm sewer, was received and a public hearing scheduled to be held on April 4, 1989. �. The final assessment roll for Project 518, Eagan High School - utilities, was received and a public hearing ordered for April 4, 1989. 10. The specs for Maintenance Vehicle 0125, miscellaneous equipment and attachments, were approved and authorization given to advertise for a bid opening to be held at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 1989. 11. The 3rd and final payment for Contract 88-06, Braun Court - street and storm sewer, was approved. 12. The 5th and final payment for Contract 88-12, Eagan High School - utilities, was approved. 13. The 2nd and final payment for Contract 87-32C, Chapel Hill Addition - streets and utilities, was approved. 14. The petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road was received and a public bearing scheduled for April 4, 1989. 15. The Cooperative Power Association Lease Agreement for South Well Field "D", Fire Station #3, was approved. 16. The City Council expressed support for a pilot project using police personnel to assist with drug education in Eagan elementary schools starting in 1990. OLD BUSINESS ,_.a20. Contract 88-24, Lexington Ave - reservoir, was awarded to the lowest bidder. ULV1. The conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 foot tall, "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S 6 W Industrial Acres was continued to the June 6, 1989 City Council meeting. The staff was directed to review Chapter 4 of the City Code, those regulatory provisions relating to the sign ordinance and present modification to that ordinance. 22. A comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III to CPD was approved and sent to the Met Council for their review. The rezoning from AG to PD, a preliminary plat and a conditional use permit for pylon signs for the Park Center Addition project will be considered after Met Council review. 23. Action was taken to request a high priority for the widening of Cliff Road to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners between I -35E and Cliff Center. PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. The public hearing for Project 546, Cedarvale Boulevard - restoration/ resurfacing, was approved and the public hearing closed. 18. The public hearing was closed and the vacation of the drainage and utility easement on Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Pond, was approved. 19. The public hearing was closed and the vacation of Heritage Lane, north of Yankee Doodle Road, was approved. OLD BUSINESS ,_.a20. Contract 88-24, Lexington Ave - reservoir, was awarded to the lowest bidder. ULV1. The conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 foot tall, "V" shaped billboard advertising sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S 6 W Industrial Acres was continued to the June 6, 1989 City Council meeting. The staff was directed to review Chapter 4 of the City Code, those regulatory provisions relating to the sign ordinance and present modification to that ordinance. 22. A comprehensive guide plan amendment from D -III to CPD was approved and sent to the Met Council for their review. The rezoning from AG to PD, a preliminary plat and a conditional use permit for pylon signs for the Park Center Addition project will be considered after Met Council review. 23. Action was taken to request a high priority for the widening of Cliff Road to the Dakota County Board of Commissioners between I -35E and Cliff Center. 24. The preliminary plat (replat) for Oak Cliff 3rd Addition was approved. NEW BUS 25. The fiscal 1988 budget adjustments as prepared and presented were approved. 26. An additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle was approved. ZL&_27. A modification of the Cliff Lake Galleria sign agreement to permit the pylon sign and a monument sign to be relocated at Cliff Lake Center was approved. 28. The comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 1.4 agricultural acres to a limited business district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminary plat were continued indefinitely and with the understanding that the item would be sent back to the Advisory Planning Commission. 9. The comprehensive guide plan amendment and rezoning of 16.46 agricultural acres to a public facilities district and a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary grade school located east Lf �of Dodd Road and south of Diffley Road were approved. T.j ' Direction was provided to designate certain parcels and surplus, ha6 including HUD parcels, in Lexington South to seek appraisals on the value of property. ADM MSTRATIVE AGENDA 1 31. The petition was received for Project 561, Sterns Addition - streets and utilities, and authorization was given for the preparation of a / feasibility report. 32. A public hearing was scheduled to vacate the public right-of-way, Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road, for April 4, 1989. 3. Authorization was given to settle the Wescott Garden Lots condemnation. t * * * t t !�[1�t�(.23�. All bills were approved and ordered paid. MINUTES OF REGULW.NEETIMG OF`TRE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MARC3f'-7; 1989 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, March 7, 1989, at 6:30 p.m:;a::;t3#e:•:gaa, Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and Egan, Gustafson and McCrea. Also present were City A!tinisftktor Tom Hedges, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, Community*:Development Director Dale Runkle, City Planner Jim Sturm, Assista&.-City*.:—.gineer Mike Foertsch and City Attorney James Sheldon,:.::.;:;:::>':•::::•• City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended continuing Item C under the Consent Agenda (License, Gambling, Minnesota Valley Exchange Club, Pulltabs at,.Richard's Food and Liquor, 4185 South Robert Trail) to the Marcti::1-�r.:.,1989, City Council meeting. Wachter moved, McCrea as amended. All voted in f motion to approve the agenda February 21. 1989. Mayor Ellison requested the change on page 1, paragraph 4, correcting the name to "Mike Michou". Councilmember Egan requested the correction from Bonestroo representative to Dakota County„8•i.yhway:: Department representative, Dave Zeck, on pages 4 and:;:::: McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, tha'motion to approve the minutes for the February 21, 198*:k:reguUr Council meeting as amended. All voted in favor. RESOLUTION/FULL TRANSFER OF THE STATR'S MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TO THE HIGHWAY USER TAX DISTRIBUTION FUND Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch introduced the matter to the Council. Wachter moved, Egan second d:,.:.:. kt!e•:notion to approve the resolution to allow full ttajikket::::o AE;state Is motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tax—disfr'ili'utioa fund. All voted in favor. Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7,, 1989 POLICE .0 . EPARTMENT RNMANIZATION Chief of Police Pat Gft.,gan repopt.#A to the Council regarding the reorganization request. Coi*#A.-memW-*-t*39gan asked if a balance would ...:r ............. be maintained between the twd-* '1:1:0-0A -hints. Geagan responded yes. Egan requested a clarification regarding the administrative secretary. Mayor Ellison asked if this would achieve the Police Department's goal of constant supervision. Geagan responded yes,, on paper. Wachter moved, Gustaf -M... .......... C.:::*:the motion to approve the reorganization of the PoliEi'e"'*V***'A*"g-'t"'W'-e'�'ff"t'-.' .Management structure as presented. All voted in favor. DEPA4P T " RES T City Administrator Tdff`� Q'g'es''-:*t d a thank you letter from the O'Patrany grandparents. Chief Southorn informed the Council that the Eagan Fire Department was involved in controlling the NSP Black Dog fire. John Hohenstein distii.w**� ats from the recycling firm and stated the public response Va ' tas.t ' ic. Councilmember McCrea questioned where the containers w6r"':::'2"-i'f t. Mr. Bohenstein stated they should be at the doorstep. Item A. 1. Clerk/typist positions. a. Full-time clerk/typ.* to approve the hiring of vg completion of the City's phy . s J L'c a .'e'x -i" as b. Half-time clerk/typist i*'..COME recommended to continue the hirin*4':*:for 21, 1989, City Council meeting. ation. It was recommended subject to successful on requirements. ty Development. it was e position until the March c. Half-time clerk/typist in Parts Department. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Nancy Hammel subject to the successful completion of the City's physical examination requirements. Item B. Plumbers Licel) ....... It was recommended to approve the..8-.-.plumbing licenses and 1 water softener license as presented. Page 3/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Item C. It was recommended to City Council meeting. item to the March 21, 1989, It was recommended to. pg�Ep-P:--an.,amendment of the liquor license for LaFonda DeAcebo Restaural t:: iD::ll` kik i a new manager (Judy Johnson, 1400 47th Avenue, Columb#a Heights). Item E. 21 - Storm Sewer). It was recommended to continue indefinitely the scheduled final assessment hearing for Project 527 (Lexington Square - Storm Sewer). Item F. It was recommended to'`""rec3;Fe Project 487R (Braun Court - Street public hearing to be held on Aril Item G. e final assessment roll for . Storm Sewer) and schedule a It was recommended to receive the final assessment roll for Project 518 (Eagan High School - Utilities) and order the public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989. Item H. Maintenance Vg-:: Approve Specs/Authorize Ad for Bids (Miscellaneous Ea+' +ten *'--i'++-''A*fachments) It was recommended to approvie the *becifications for Maintenance Vehicle No. 125 (Miscellaneous Ec'tlpmenV::and Attachments) and authorize the advertisement for a"bid opening to be held at 10:00 a.m. on March 14, 1989. Item I. Contract 88-06, Final Payment/Acceptance (Braun Court - Streets and Storm Sewer). It was recommended to approve the'. ird and final payment for Contract 88-06 (Braun Court;..-..;Stz.aat..,S3�d;.Storm Sewer) and accept the project for perpetual maint ....t It was recommended to AftX...00 ::.)ie fifth and final payment for Contract 88-12 (Sagan High School - Utilities) and accept the project for perpetual maintenance. Item R. It was recommended to appr Contract 87-32C (Chapel Hill Ad accept the project for perpetuo Item L. Road) . nce. and final payment for s and Utilities) and It was recommended to receive the petition to vacate a portion of public right-of-way for Auge Road and schedule a public hearing to be held on April 4, 1989.::::.:. Item M. It was recommended to app.-qV*:::t-he6':Vooperative Power Association Lease Agreement for South kIell-'s eYd 'D" (Fire Station No. 3) and authorize the Mayor and Ci. £y"A erk to execute all related documents. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the foregoing consent agenda items as amended and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. DRUG AwAli$IiSS::>:iSTCE EDUCATION City Administrator Tom Hedges:infcikmed the Council that staff was considering a program for fifth grafi drug education to be conducted by the Police Officers,.:,:, Chief of Police Pat Geagan explained the program which would consist of one hour per week for 17 weeks. Be stated the course was very structured and that there was a training program involved. The Lions Club would pay for the travel expenses. Be further stated that January of 1990 was the soonest the pr gg am could begin. Councilmember McCrea efiaL d r3h.'s.:: #-t there should be grant money available for the payment e;tikgs*des;;:$he felt there should not be duplication on different levels and that:.:the program should be coordinated. She stated the children's?:v.iew point should not be overlooked. Page 5/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 19.89 Mayor Ellison felt tli* money would:' -be well spent as the program was a very worthy endeavor:::::::.. Councilmember Gustafson :at:;t3are was tremendous pressure every year to add hours to currf;i4i..: He felt the program was needed. City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council no action was necessary on the matter. PROJECT 546/CRDARVALB BO.MAiRb:�:' STRSBT RBSURFACIIiG) Assistant City Engineer Mike;FoertAth updated the Council on the matter. Bob Freegard (OSM) presented the`'details of the feasibility report to the Council. Be reviewed the location, structure of pavement, repairs needed and the overlay. Be reported that the project would provide uniform width and he outlined the storm sewer improvements. Be showed the assessment areas and presented the estimated cost. Councilmember Egan questi:dffad;:;th;e:::;storm sewer improvements. Mr. Freegard described the nature::Of the hiprovements. Councilmember Wachter questioned the change5::;made.:?C1#: he west end. Mr. Freegard described the changes. Councilmember Gustafsifn asked why the north properties were not assessed. Mr. Freegard stated those properties had their own service road. Mr. Gustafson stated the other properties also had a service road. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch informed the Council that those service roads were part of. the gas station property and that it was a private access drive: 64i' Councilmember Egan questionod:::the 1-0.8 contingency. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that 0const;i:uction had more unknowns than new construction. Councilmember Gustafson indicated that Rahn Road should also be upgraded. Councilmember McCrea concurred and stated that Rahn Road was in bad shape. Public Works Director Tom Colbert pointed out that the neighboring residents opposed a past proposal to upgrade Rahn Road. Assistant City Enginee.c:;::K ke:;::$Qs;,.zsch emphasized that the assessments were consistenti:iih::::ia6t::::actices. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the melon to close the public hearing and approve Project 546 (CedarV410 Boulevard - Restoration/Resurfacing) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. All voted in favor. Page 6/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 VACATE DRAINAGE A116:QTILITY EA IMSNT (LOT 15, BLOCS 1F E�tTQ1F3NDS) Assistant City Engineer M1Ce"'Poertsch supplied the information regarding the petition for the Council. He informed the Council that the petitioner requested a two-week continuance of the matter to further review the landscaping. Mayor Ellison questift."", aFi >g£fi tt that would have on the Council action. Mr.Foertsch staiod the ;would be no effect. Councilmember Egan commented that the matter should not be continued. McCrea moved, Egan sec.9n4 :#;ice:tiption to close the public hearing and approve the vaca1fflh a::e drainage and utility easement for Lot 15, Block 1, Chatterton Ponds, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. VACATE A PORTION OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY (HERITAGE LANE - NORTH .;QF YANKEE DOODLE ROAD) Assistant City Engine6r'-`Mz(te::::R9.ertsch furnished an update on the matter for the Council. Egan moved, Wachter seco;5led;.:' } :kbtion to close the public hearing and approve the va.cat 04. df'a portion of street right-of-way (Heritage Lane - North of :3F�iike"e Doodle Road), and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted in favor. AWARD CONTRACT/LEXINGTON AVENUE - RESERVOIR (CONTRACT ... $$-24/P.ROJECT 538A) City Administrator Tom""'HPi ggpAidmriatized the background on the matter. City Attorney Jim Sheldo>}:4nforiegd the Council that a verbal commitment had been received from:hhe ff:tle insurance company and that the matter could be closed next w4iiA. Assistant City Engineer informed the Council that the City couiif::proceed with the contract award. Egan moved, Wachter secondedF the motion to award Contract 88-24 (Lexington Avenue - Reservoir) to Brown,.Tank Minneapolis of Eagan and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to eifecute all related documents. All voted in favor. CONDITIONAL USE PERltI;' 6"::iODTDOOR ADVERTISING SIGN City Administrator Tom Hedges intr�uced the item to the Council and stated that the APC recommended derd-41 of the application. Page 7/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 Community Development.:. -Director Dale Runkle summarized the application and stated the::e,ize of tb :::;sign exceeded criteria. City Administrator Tom Hedges st4:;the::?4+itstanding obligations should be stricken and could be added date. Councilmember McCrea asked for a review of the rules"regarding financial obligations. Mr. Hedges stated that a plat or a waiver of plat is the triggering action. McCrea stated she felt the City should be consistent. Arthur Dean (Naegele):tgpoKY.#c3i;kY the site meets the criteria of the present sign ordinan�e••:*.l he felt the size of the sign was an issue but that the Councl3�:had:lowed larger signs in the past. He explained that the size..of the". - sign was an industry standard. He submitted a list g#::; agar Advertisers who have used Naegele signs and stated 1�at::::#f:r,#*;jit'allow advertisers to move about. Councilmember Egan questioned if the height of the sign met City Code. Mr. Runkle stated yes. Mr. Egan pointed out that the Council had previously discussed the location of freeway signs and questioned if this sign met that criteria. Mr. Runkle stated yes and that it was one of the few sites remain 'ha:... Mayor Ellison requested use' concept. Mr. Dean expla have principle use language, same. He stated that Naegel:e. sign. tlbn regarding the "principle Eagan ordinance did not iEAhe results were basically the ike businesses to retain the City Attorney Jim Sheldon described Eagan's ordinance and stated that the City had determined that 250 feet was appropriate. He indicated that if larger signs were requested, standards should be set forth in the ordinance..........::............... Mayor Ellison suggested 'a.rev2ta'of'•the billboard ordinance. Mr. Hedges stated he felt that it wa*::a gogl:point and that it had been about seven years since the ordii4nce w.as reviewed. He stressed that the City of Eagan was changing rgpidly::::Vouncilmember Egan emphasized that if the City set reasonable standards, it could avoid problems. Councilmember McCrea expressed her concerns and stated that she felt Eagan should never resemble South Robert Street. She pointed out that she was previously on the sign committee. Mayor Ellison recommended reviewiat other municipalities' sign ordinances regarding spacing, size, prli+ciple'use, etc. He requested that the applicant in this...wat:te:s:;:be.:::I. oluded in staff discussions. Mr. Runkle informed the CoOO.,.t :tea .-W if June 1 would be a reasonable time for response back to the;Council. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the:.Notion to continue to the June 5, 1989, City Council meeting the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to allow a 40 foot tall, •v° shaped Page 8/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 billboard advertising sign*;*O'n Lot 2, BI - 6 - dk It S & W Industrial Acres, to allow further research i6f...the billb6ikrd ordinance. All voted in favor. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMMMUT/PM CENTER ADDITION/FEDERAL LAND COMPANY City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that the APC had considered the applicat-4--#4m subaft-ted by Federal Land Company ... .......... ive Guide Plan Amendment and recommended a denial oU:;tbW:::g"Vr- e;hs and rezoning. Community Development DireV'ar Dat#Iunkle reviewed the site plan with the Council and made-:44&r4q!nVW:to the BRA Option K. Be informed the Council that t'*h*'4'*:%:':"d"'j'5 . pl'! t.gt- 1 6 n had been reviewed with the City Attorney. Martin Colon (Federal Land Company) announced that he was prepared to give a full presentation if requested by the Council. In regard to the traffic matter_, ' he stated he had met with Sorenson and Colbert and that eventuall.y�j�::�prpbably 1991# Cliff Road would be a six -lane road. He stated th j ft:gu.ration would be similar to Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Colon explained that '&4ybr counted all trees in excess of 6 inches in width -a -ii 'r e feet tall and that the count was approximately 180 . He s"il'iMthe trees were concentrated in the northwest corner near the senior citizens site. He observed that if the plan proceeded, 208 to 25% of the trees would be saved if the office buildings were installed. He explained that if the BRA plan was approved, up to 338 of the trees could be saved. He reported that Federal Land Company when the development was completed. Councilmember McCrea asked *'hOn th""'.:.center would open. Mr. Colon stated it would open either when ' Ehe fiJikl placement of Cliff Road was completed (about 1991) or whfifi'..:the.nterim construction could be accomplished, including the widening andii ignalizing of the westerly access point. He stated this would solve the problem. He announced that the developer would assume the cost of the upgrade. Councilmember McCrea suggested using the Target lot as a prototype for saving trees. Mr. Colon si-fitted the developer was willing to make that commitment. Councilmember Egan qud;gt1-iiie'B::: in other areas of the development would be saved. He also questioned what type of interim improvements were needed. Mr. Colon into"'it'imed the Council that the developer was willing to pursue any inte-tim options set out by the County and the City engineers. Mr. Egan questioned if it would be an "either/or" proposition. Assistant City Engineer responded yes. Page 9/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1969 Councilmember McCrea questioned if Federal Land could open earlier if the temporary provisions w�tg made. It ::Colon stated yes. Mayor Ellison recommended that th�&;:;�;ity.;abQ4lid encourage the upgrading as top priority. Councilmember t+�tiehs:t�uestioned if the County approval was for the two entrances off of"Cliff Road. Mr. Colon responded that it was only preliminary. Mr. Foertsch informed the Council that the County had not reviewed the study and would not do so until March 13. Be stated that the 1991 or 1992 upgrade was not official. Councilmember McCrea istafe''ip:cil could approve a resolution. City Administrator Hedgeg commented that staff could reprioritize the capital improvments ],.an. City Attorney Jim Shei:]q is sm Yd i. d that it was a sensitive area and that whichever di ecfion•.EnE`:Council went, there would be criticism and perhaps a lawsuit. Be informed the Council of two alternatives: I. Obtain additional information and facts regarding use of the entire Park Center site a$:;.a:multi-family development. II. 1. Send the CPD Comprehensive 6u d$'::Plan Metropolitan Council for;?:i:ev:i2k!+> 2. Send the west part::l' fhe Park Center begin action for rezoning that property Amendment to the property to the APC to to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to prepare the following: a. Resolution sive Guide Plan. b. Resolution a 6ii pproving::t 'E� rezoning and entering into the Planned Development AgX0.emenk:::Tor the eastern part of the property to Commercial:;E!lanned;:Development uses. C. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat of the eastern part of the property with the western part of the property as shown as an outlot. d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to reviAf;te: Ex4 atd Option Agreement with the HRA and Federal Land for acggi6ition of the eastern part of the property. Page 10/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 g. Settlement Agzgement for .the condemnation lawsuit between the City: i6f Eagan aisti4ederal Land for acquisition of the pond and dtit!ents on the Park Center property.. Mayor Ellison asked how the Metropolitan Council received authority to rezone in Eagan. Mr. Sheldon stated the authority was given by the state legislature and he further explained the history. Councilmember McCrea cb�6fit'> #ia : she thought the Comprehensive Guide Plan was a guide. "e stated the changes in the surrounding land use had not affected this parcel and questioned how a lawsuit could be generated.1!'':%%i.ShelGlp1 stated that a lawsuit would not mean that the Council di:,d,•;:�a A "h:.::siiong. McCrea stated the City had not received a lawsuit:fa 'quia`hile. Councilmember Gustafson questioned that if the Council needed to take a procedure, what assurance would the developer have. He stated he leaned toward the proposed type of development and questioned if the resolutions would coverthese concerns. Mr. Sheldon stated that. the procedure was consistdi.. :::with the last five Planned Development Agreements and that all part3{�::.thpuld understand the position. Mr. Sheldon also commentedthat'))* 120 day limit applied only to the preliminary plat and ttiat..:;i�e:::applicant should agree to the continuance. Councilmember Egan suggested the Council act on only two matters at the present time: (1) recommend change to the Comprehensive Guide Plan; or (2) rezone to Multi Residential. Councilmember Wachter suggested also including sending it to Dakota County. Councilmember Egan queattd8:e:i!fet Council's timeframe. Community Development Dir6'&di"Da]'e"i(uri'kle stated it could be anywhere from 10 to 90 days and tih�t tli0:::traffic studies would be reviewed.X. Councilmember Gustafson questioned -'::chat if the. City sent the matter to the Metropolitan Council and it approved, could the City still change its mind. Councilmember Egan stated the record was clearly established and that in 1984, the Council refused rezoning on the basis of excess commercial in Eagan...Since that time, there has been substantial change in the area. He:.-'�gjtated that the plan is very sensitive and that the developer demonAi ated that D -III would be spot zoning. He further stat�:d::::that::,tha ..rttudy showed that the area is ripe for further retail zor"siiq Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the 4{tion to: I. Approve and send the CPD Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment for Park Center Addition to the Metropolitan Council for review. Page 11/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 2. Send the west part j0f. the Park:::: enter property to the APC to begin action for rezori patK.bperty to R-3. 3. Direct City staff to phi ie the following: a. Resolution amending the Comprehensive Guide Plan. b. Resolution apprift-ft :::.hip..::!r-.ezoning and entering into the Planned Developmpiit- A4}feei6eiit::: or the eastern part of the property to Commercial. -.1 #::Development uses. c. Resolution approvi ?;.the ftpliminary Plat of the eastern part of the proPe:;:ty:vTit{t..t:vestern part of the property as shown as an ou ld, d. Subdivision Agreement. e. Pylon Sign Agreement. f. Staff to reviQia:kh€,.executed Option Agreement with the ARA and Federal LAftil::;€4::acquisition of the eastern part of the property. g. Settlement Agreempt:;fpiC::::the condemnation lawsuit between the City ..of: Na:s3'aii'"and Federal Land for acquisition of the pond and ut3.f'ty easements on the Park Center property. All voted in favor. Councilmember Egan stAted.the.;:appl:icant agrees to continue the preliminary plat applicatiaii:; Wachter moved, Gustafson se Ca:pded,:tihe motion to approve a resolution requesting Dakota County upgrade Cliff Road between I -35E and Cliff Center. All voted in fajor. PRELIMINARY PLAT/OAE CLIFF 3RD ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges introduced the matter to the Council. Community Development Director::Dale Runkle summarized the application. Assistant City Engineer Milo& Foertsch informed the Council that staff did not recall making's commitment to the developer regarding unasse@54!:::fi?fs�ii::obligations. Councilmember Egan referenced Tom.W. bert's letter dated March 2, 1988, to Tom Hedges. He stated that:afie Council alone would make those determinations. Councilmember Wactiter noted that even if staff had made commitments, it would not be binding. Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7. 1989 ............. Saul Bernick distribd ' ed a packet..�o the Council, including an .- Affidavit from Greg Soule. -::::Re informe&*t-'be Council that Mr. Schlangen ....... ..... . contested the new special aV4MswPent*:V . nd believed it was a 9i*id-:::t.-Uit at no time was anyone aware settlement negotiation. He that such an assessment would e-'9 f -s: -:-t-.- He announced that they felt it was a binding agreement. Councilmember Egan stated he felt the Owner had a duty to inquire as to the authority ii:i::Nt::::r.at:te..mated that the City enters into all agreements through Councilmember Wachter emphasized that every parcel MUO:.:pay -ft financial obligations. . Mr. Bernick pointed out thg't'.theyi*d relied on the City's actions. City Administrato.r.:... ",.d X -TOM .: ges.*Xecapped the procedure for the City requiring avail abil i. Bernick stated that the assessment was arbitrary. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch commented that the review with Mr. Wobschall was to identify and explain the assessments. Councilmember Egan stated the City would not negotiate on the basis of supposed statements by Wobschall. City Attorney James hie 2*don stated that only unimproved property could be deferred. Mr. Hed4iiii:iijitited. it should either be included or waived. Mr. Sheldon commented.:..tE'g'i:::�iii�:-Schlangen must determine what is owed and who has authority�::.Council-mqiinber Egan questioned if the Council needed to establish a Sheldon stated it could be waived. Mayor Ellison pointed' -but that the City needed to recover these costs and that a deferment would be a good compromise. Egan moved, Wachter preliminary plat (replat) of two lots (2.91 acres) the west side of Slater F quarter of Section 31, as the following conditions: seconded, the motion to approve the submi 1. The standard conditions Council action on September 15l B2r B4, Clr C2r C4t DI, Ell Fl, ed.Dak..Cliff 3rd Addition consisting ,, acres) located along t K.:-df::::aIff Road in the northwest tW by;tobert Schlangen, subject to of plat*:::*&pproval as adopted by 1987, shall be complied with: All Bl, and Gl. 2. Lot I shall be reviewed by the,City Council prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. A revised landscaM:-:.plam-:.shal.:-I--:be submitted for Lot 1 based ":*:": *� ...... .................. on current landscape policy"...*":,:V'._A" to the final plat submission. 4. The development is required to:;*a;ad a sediment trap for the car wash and service station portion of the property to keep debris and sediment from settling out in the City's sanitary sewer line. Page 13/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 5. The development is rft-jgred t.q:jp ;Dvide sewer and water service to each platted par 6. Subject to a written agreement to allow assessment, the assessible cost shall be deferred and assessed to OUtlot B. All voted in favor. Councilmember Gustafson he: aske-i:4f ::� 0.. Was correct in that the City did not propose assessments at thi::*'0"ther::)ftages. Mr. Foertsch stated he was correct. Mr. Gustafson rept ed thzt.:he felt uncomfortable when the City missed it so many ti.mesj&t aji4ed it was a compromise. GENERAL FUND BUDGET JWJUSR'IIBP/DECEMBER 31, 1988 City Administrator Tom Hedges described the adjustments to the Council and stated that the matter could be considered at the work session. Councilmember McCrea a2Md:-::&f--:-:A.e legal fees had been under -estimated for 1988. Mr.that lawsuits make up a certain portion of the legal fe#s and. further stated that Hauge received all of his payments la: ' 6� * t yea-r:;';�*W. explained that the transition caused doubling of 14% -'X:-:--�%D%6-'-a'-'f-S- but that the revenue would offset it. McCrea questionec):�:�i'f..i:.�:..'t'�le 1989 legal fees would also increase. Mr. Hedges stated:'11fit revenue sources are tight and that the City would need to do tight monthly forecasting. He informed the Council that the 1989 budget would be monitored closely. McCrea suggested taking a look at the engineering provisions. She requested good projections. She felt there was a need for an in-house policy in regards to contacting consul:t stated that it should ar L1,r:- -:ibd:-::b6htact the attorneys. strictly be a legal matter Councilmember McCrea emphasized thAt she -.vas not saying that the fees were too high, just recommending t)iat it:O:*.** .ould be monitored. Councilmember Egan indicated ifiat tW projected budget increased by 408 and that the City should take a 166k at the matter. Be stated that the revenues were not increasing as fast as the expenditures. He felt the City could not count on permits and fees to handle the budget. City Administrator Tom Hedges expla: d that 1989 would have upward adjustments to the rev RA er explained the budgeting process. .... . Mayor Ellison commented that the City -.:had a higher contingency amount at the present time. He stated thiit:lthe City also estimated revenues more liberally and felt that the City should begin to estimate revenues more conservatively. Page 14/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the. -.Motion to approve the fiscal 1988 budget adjustments ad:. esented: *1 voted in favor. VARIANCE/BUILDING #W0f !MCB/VILLAUME INDUSTRIES Community Development Director Dale Runkle briefed the Council on the application. Nick Linsmeier (Plant:;Dltttd: t—.:J:::::W firmed the Council that the hardship was for fire safety' 'r'e'aseiri:: explained the layout and the type of product of the industry ie fui~ther explained the flow of people through the building. Mayor Ellison questioiierl;::R+(fyfa::(plicant did not consider moving the entry further riCYtii: Mr :::L"fnsmeier stated the proposed location is located where the old entrance is. Mr. Runkle disclosed that the issue regarding the parking on the street should be resolved. Councilmember Wachter had concerns regarding the parking requirements. Mayor Ellison questioned if more stalls could be added. Mr :-"*peier addressed the parking concerns and stated more stalls couid-:'fiol:b*t":added but that there was enough parking in the lot. Councilmember OViiiifson asked what was wrong with parking in the street. Egan moved, Wachter se#ti?i7"the motion to continue the matter to the March 21, 1989, Citi: -.6 uacil meeting in regard to the additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Eagandale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle. Mayor Ellison stated •he:;•€e : ;:;4he:; W.o matters should not be linked together and that Ye::Y3tk3e::siiould be decided on its own merits. Councilmember Egan statedhe felt the two were linked together. Egan and Wachter voted in f &6r; 4:3ison, Gustafson and McCrea voted against. The motion failed. McCrea moved, Ellison seconded, the motion to approve an additional 18 foot variance to the 40 foot building front setback for Villaume Industries located at Lot 5, Ea�andale Center Industrial Park 2nd Addition - 2926 Lone Oak Circle} subject to the condition that the applicant work with the City staff to assure adequate parking. All voted in favor::;::::;::::;:'.: Councilmember Wachter questioned i;.:the matter met City Code. Councilmember Egan questioned the requ x'Vments of the Code. City Attorney Jim Sheldon cited City Code 11A0. Councilmember Gustafson reviewed the hardship with the developer. Page 15/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 CLIFF LASE GALLXRIA SIGN A M E MEN T MODIFICATION Community DevelopmenIE':::#J-Xector...:l'M*I*iB Runkle explained the modification to the sign ag"k*"e'*'A"%"P*'0'*'********"'6**d .0""Ok stated that the City's sign inspector had reviewed the mailii: , A"*nd indicated there was nothing which would prohibit consideration of the request. Gustafson moved, Egan seconded, the motion to approve a modification of the Cliff:ir-.4(t; I -ar:i:a:::Sign Agreement to permit the pylon sign and a monument:::'g"i-'q''6':';*k':6"e*,:*:,':"r*"*,***I"bcated at Cliff Lake Center as presented. All voted in favoe.:.-.:: COMPREHENSIVE GUIDJfifLAN A*NDMENT/REZ0N331Q/ OUTLOT ADDITION City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council that a letter had been received from the developer requesting a continuance. Rollie Crawford (developer) informed the Council that the developer is seriously rethinking the entire request and would return before the APC if the pla�...'.vEgs....changed. ........ Councilmember Egan asked i'f-%,*+.-4*&K'.— as an engineering report. Community Development Direct6.4Dale Runkle stated that the applicant had requested review without:'W, Ellison remarked that the developer should let tb -O'Widil air its commercial concerns. Mr. Crawford stated the develo-Or.- -:;-Vanted to re-evaluate the entire situation. Councilmember McCrea asked for the length of the continuance requested. Mr. Crawford stated indefinite and reiterated that the developer was willing to 9() .. bacX..baf9.re the APC. McCrea complimented the developer on its atti .... ....... ... the request. Egan moved, McCrea seconded -":::::the 9"*".tion to continue indefinitely the Comprehensive Guide Plan Ame#*aent--.-'a%'.jnd rezoning of 1.4 Agricultural acres to a Limited fiosine' Silv:district on Outlot C of the Kingswood 2nd Addition preliminaiy plai.'::'to allow the developer to review the entire request, with the condition that if the plan changes, the matter will be referred back to the Advisory Planning Commission. All voted in favor. )MPREHEWSIVE GUIDE PLAN A=WDKENT/REZON331Q/ PRELIMINARY PLAT/STERES MbITION/ISD #196 City Administrator T X0.duced the matter to the ...... Council. Community Developme*nt"D'i*i"e*"'c**t"oi*.'.Pale Runkle stated the architects were available to discuss th'e"'::bus access issue. Page 16/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7. 1989 ...... . ..... Kevin Sullivan (Wold..A.ssociation).....thanked the staff for their consideration in the handl.;'l ter and stated he was available for questions. Mayor Ellison asked Mr. Sullivan if he were comfortable with the bus circulation. Mr. Sullivan responded yes. Coancilmember Egan questioned if the City bad reviewed the matter. Public Works Director Tom Colbert replied that staff had reviewed the matter and was also evaluating the over -flow &0 %.cial events and increasing u . the width of Dodd Road. Cdn'd"**"%'1-1ft ib4 t- ..O.chter questioned the access width. Mr. Sullivan explained t1i ::widtfi:..:-Mr. Wachter questioned if the parking would be adequate foLic..speci-Al events. Mr. Sullivan reported that the residential are- ,be used and that it is the past practice of the School .es mU$;.t. ".i. use residential areas. li* McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment changing the land use designation from Mixed Residential to Public Facilities (schools), as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterna Addition. All voted in favor. Wachter moved, Egan si motion to approve a rezoning of 16.46 Agricultural acres t.a.. a PU .,Fa cil i ties district, as submitted by Independent Scho.;6-1 No. 196 - Sterns Addition. All voted in favor. Egan moved, McCrea se�hdbd, the motion to approve a preliminary plat consisting of one lot for an elementary school located east of Dodd Road and south of Backmore Drive (extended) in the north half of Section 25, as submitted by Independent School District No. 196 - Sterns Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard condt iik-:ipproval as adopted by Council action on September 15# !9'81_1's'ha*l'l be complied with: Al, B1, B2, B3r B4, Cl, C2F C5, DI, El ail:4 G.I. 2. The development will be i:6auir4*to limit post -development phosphorus export levels to pre-develoMbnt levels. 3. City staff to review the grading plan and the School District to be required to remove the drainage from the Schramm property. 4. The development will be requirto submit a landscape plan which defines the boundary of the scho6l':'and the Schramm property. S. The School District-,.".'t4-h-ld adjoining property owners of the discrepancy in the survey. .....X.: All voted in favor. Page 17/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 BUD P0%:BASZ/ SOUTH City Administrator Tomthe Council on the background of the matter. V01, Councilmember McCrea requested further clarification. Public Works Director Tom Colbert stated that BUD would only sell the entire parcel. Councilmember selling the land (for this parcel) but retaining the Daniel Drive. Councilmember Wachter requesied':'tffie amizipt of acreage being sold. Community Development Director Dale Runkle stated it was approximately 17 acres. ....... X -o Councilmember McCrea :q:6ittioh":::,-1-*f Brad Swenson incurred the legal costs. City Attorney Jim Sheldon stated he was sure there were some costs which were incurred and suggested the Council have the land appraised. Councilmember Egan had concerns regarding title problems. Egan moved, Wachter fiEnded, the motion to give direction to the City staff as follows: .... . . 1. The HUD property locat;iod at.tj�t.:�:Zouthwest corner of Lexington o: Avenue and Diffley Road is t:4)*--: Aik .**:- It - r the reservoir site. V . ...... . . .. . 2. The following pro&'.*-'t-iy :.... is no longer necessary for the purpose for which it was required and shall be designated surplus and should be appraised for sale as follows: a. The northerly extension of Daniel Drive at Diffley Road to be appraised with the intan R-1 property. b. The property along thi east of Walnut Hills Park of Wilderness Run Road and ised as R-1 or R-2. c. The portion of the previO.4'sly P'*'4";'.-'Oposed Soderholm Addition at the northwest corner of Lexington:44enue/Diffley Road to be appraised with the intent to sell as R-4 or Commercial. All voted in favor. PROJECT 561/RECEIVE PETITION/OAftR FEASIBILITY REPORT (STERNS ADDITION - STREEft'AND UTILITIES) Egan moved, Gustafson-*.-:*0.,W---ft- :motion to receive the 7 petition for Project 561 (Sterns Addition - Streets and Sewers) and authorize the preparation of a feasibiIiii-t-'y report. All voted in favor. Page 18/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 PETITION TO VACATE PLIC RIGHTS=WAY (BGAH AVB90B - VILAS LANE':11};ILQ'. OB ROAD) Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to schedule a public hearing to vacate the public right-of-way (Egan Avenue - Vilas Lane to Pilot Knob Road) for April 4, 1989. All voted in favor. City Administrator Tom Hedges st approved by the state but that kh;E co move. Mr. Hedges also eta been resolved. the Town Hall Grant was not would fund a portion of the rsha Bussey water matter had Mr. Hedges referenced his memorandum regarding the Community Center and stated it was a draft only. Councilmember Egan me #;f9Aed..to the Council that the City of Chanhassen was utilizing TIF'fot:::?Community Center. Community Development Di)tgctor,;DaI.0.:Runkle updated the Council on the Seneca project. Public Works Director.:''1`6i' Colbert presented an update on Dodd Road/494 upgrade. Councilmember Wachter had concerns regarding airplane noise. Councilmember Gustafs4n•:aekeci:;€:;:,tt►e Council would conduct a workshop on the ref erendumakt4:rsri Ellison stated a workshop was scheduled for March 28, 1989,.;an8 that the workshop could partially be devoted to the topic;.:. Councilmember Gustafson had<:tionceixf* regarding "discovered assessments' and he stated that they seem to come up often and questioned if they could all be found at once. Public Works Director Tom Colbert explained the process. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated that the City collects what it can. Mayor Ellison commended the Public.s?porks Department in the admirable job of clearing the snow at tfA last snow storm. Mayor Ellison stated was looking good and that an ice arena was being proposed; Councilmember Egan had concerns r oiirding the Council packet for the meeting and stated that he felt the conditions were becoming skimpy. Public Works Director Tom Colbert responded that because of Page 19/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES March 7, 1989 _.... .............::::.. the necessity of many Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to settle the Wescott Garden Lots Condemnation. All voted in favor. No= ; �o, sem__ — Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded the motion to approve the checklist dated February 28, 1989..in tb:e:amount of $527,288.53; the checklist dated March 6, 1989.,J-h::the 4Wbnt of $128,278.97; and the checklist dated March 7, T!:xr 't#::'d9iiiunt of $217,512.26. All voted in favor. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. CITY OF EAGAN E. J. VanOverbeke City Clerk