06/20/1989 - City Council RegularAGENDA
-REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN. MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
JUNE 20, 1989
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT MEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. Presentation of 12-31-88 Annual Financial Report
B. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
P' Z 1. Resignation of Citizen Representative - Water Quality Management
Committee and Gun Club Watershed Management Organization
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
F-4 A. PERSONNEL Items
P B. DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY, Abandoned Property - 1977 Chevrolet Corvette
C. LICENSE RENEWALS, Service Station Permits
PP.� D. LICENSE RENEWALS, Trailer Permits
BOE. LICENSE RENEWALS, Amusement Devices
PlZ F. PARADE PERMIT, Application for Donald Clark/Eagan 4th, of July
Association
IF,, G. APPLICATION, Massage Therapy Establishment License and Massage Therapist
License for Today's Concept of Eagan
p.14 H. SELECTION, Space Needs Analysis Consultant
I. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 10, Regarding Dog and Cat Regulation and
rog Licensing
WAIVER OF PIAT, B.H. Grace Corporation, Lot 1, Block 6, Vienna Woods,
/ Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership
Z
<K. AMENDMENTS, to the 1989 Waste Abatement/Recycling Funding Application
1 L. CONTRACT 89-14, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Water Treatment:Plant -
' Dehumidification)
$1M. PROJECT 575, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (James Ct.
o Streetlights)
�1,� O N. PROJECT 570, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Cliff
Ridge Addition - Storm Sewer)
p .Z,% 0. CONTRACT 89-09, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Johnny Cake Ridge
r aa Road Extension)
r 1 P. VEHICLE #219, Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Sewer Vac -All)
i Q. CONTRACT 88-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedarvale Boulevard -
Overlay)
0joR. PROJECT 574, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Eagandale
10�' Industrial Park - Streetlights)
.375. GAMBLING LICENSE, Firefighters Relief Association (This ?.tem has beer
Withdrawn)
e3ST. SHOW LICENSE, for a Carnival and Public Show, Eagan Lions Fourth of July
Celebration
U. LICENSE (Temporary), for Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor, Eagan Lions
Fourth of July Celebration
O. 1 V. CONTRACT 88-17, Approve Resolution Restricting On Street Parking (Silver
1 Bell Road and Nicols Road)
W. PROJECT 533, Approve Resolution Restricting On Street Parking ( Diffley
Road)
R. CONTRACT 87-WW, Final Acceptance (Kindercare Addition - Storm Sewer)
Y. CONTRACT 88-22, Approve Change Order #1 Revised (Yorkton 2nd Addition -
Storm Sewer)
•�� Z. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 6, Repeal Dance Ordinance
P y4 AA. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 8, Traffic Regulations
QV. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
A. PROJECT 569, Armstrong Business Center - Utilities
B. VACATE Utility Easements, Whispering Woods 4th Addition
VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
P` of A. APPOINTMENT of City Insurance Representative
• ZB. CONSIDER MODIFICATION, Trailway Along Lexington Point Pkwy & Daniel
P 8 Drive
C. SPECIAL PERMIT for Northern Natural Gas Company to Construct a Steel
PFrame Building Over an Existing Meter and Regulator Facility, Located
on Outlot A, Fairway Hills 1st Addition.
�9 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to Allow a
l 40 Foot Tall, V-Shaped Billboard Advertising Sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S
/& W Industrial Acres
E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION, General Pump, 3380 Highway 149, A Four
Month Extension for Their Temporary Mobile Office
l0 F. SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, for Tri-Land Partnership of Eagan for a
Miniature Golf Course Addition to Their Tee Time in Eagan Driving Range
Located in the Lexington South PD
\3 G. CONTRACT 89-16, Review Design Alternative (Sterns Addition - Streets)
�II. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
().�\ A. CODIFICATION of 1989 City Code Amendments
1
,,10B. REZONING, Kings Wood 4th Addition/Horne Development Corp., of 3.05 A
(Agricultural) Acres and a 1.73 R-3/PD (Townhouse Residential/Planned
Development) Acres to an R-1 (Single Family) District and a PRELIMINARY
PLAT Consisting of Eight Single Family Lots Located West of Cutters Lane
/ in the NE 1/4 of Section 21
P,13� C. REZONING, The Woodlands 3rd Addition/Robert Engstrom Companies, of 2.54
A (Agricultural) Acres to an R-1 (Single Family) District and a
PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of 37 Single Family Lots on 19.5 Total Acres
(16.96 Acres Currently Zoned R-1) Located at the Northeast Corner of
I� Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the SE 1/4 of Section 14
CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 5, to Allow Off-Sale Liquor Stores to be
Open on January 1 and July 4
5$ E. CONTRACT 89-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Armstrong Business Center -
�'� Utilities)
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (COLD)
IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 14, 1989
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR JUNE 20, 3.989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
After approval
meeting minutes
meetings that w
are in order fo:
is given to the
for the June 6
ere held on May
consideration.
June 20, 1989 agenda and regular
City Council meeting and special
9 and May 30, the following items
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
A. Presentation of 12-31-88 Annual Financial Report --The firm of
Deloitte, Haskins & Sells has completed their review of all
financial transactions for 1988 and the financial report for that
calendar year, including general fund, public enterprise and all
special funds is in order for consideration by the City Council.
Upon completion of the 1988 audit, the Director of Finance and the
City Administrator have meet several times with representatives of
Deloitte, Haskins & Sells to discuss the report in detail. For a
copy of the management letter and financial report, refer to those
enclosed documents without page number.
If any member of the City Council has a question on any of the
financial transactions or recommendations as they appear in the
management letter, please feel free to contact the City
Administrator at any time prior to Tuesday. Representatives of DHS
will be at the meeting to make a brief presentation and answer any
questions from the City Council. Once the Annual Financial Report
is adopted, a copy will be submitted to the state auditor's office
to comply with the June 30 deadline that has been placed on all
cities in the State of Minnesota for submission of annual financial
reports. Also copies will be placed at the library and city
offices for inspection by the public.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Annual Financial Report for 1988 as prepared by the firm, Deloitte,
Haskins & Sells.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
B. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Resignation of Citizen Representative - Water Quality
Management Committee 6 Gun Club Watershed Management Organization-
-Enclosed on page -5 is a letter of resignation from Scott
Merkley who has been a citizen's representative on the Water
Quality Management Committee .and the Board of Managers for the Gun
Club Lake WMO. Scott, as a member of the Planning Commission and
previous employee with the City of Eagan, has been a valuable asset
to both organizations and his resignation will be surely missed.
The Public Works Director would like to discuss with the City
Council the status of both organizations in relationship to the
necessity of replacing this individual.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
of Scott Merkley from the Watershed Management Committee and Gun
Club Watershed Management organization and authorize his,
replacement as appropriate.
June 12, 1989
Mr. Thomas Colbert
Director of Public Works
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mn. ,55122
Dear Mr. Colbert:
RECE'VE,D JLM 14 Mg
This letter is to inform you of my decision to resign from both the Water
Quality Task Force and the Gun Club Water Management Organization.
This difficult decision was necessitated by the increasing amount of time
I'm spending away from home. The birth of my daughter has made me
reevaluated my priorities.
I want to thank you and the City Council for giving me the opportunity to
serve Eagan the past few years on these two Commissions. This experience
has been both learning and rewarding for me. I hope I have made a positive
contribution..
Please inform the City Council of my decision.
Sincerely,
Scott M. Merkley
0
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 20, 1989
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR JUNE 20, 1989
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Personnel Items
Item 3. Temporary Receptionist --Device Muccio-Grout, one of two
receptionists at Eagan Municipal Center, has applied for her child
care leave for expecting a new born baby for a period of four to
six months, beginning August 1, 1989. It will be necessary for the
City to hire a temporary worker to replace her for that period of
time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement
for a temporary receptionist for the Eagan Municipal Center to
cover the child care leave of Denice Muccio-Grout.
H. Selection of Space Needs Analysis Consultant --As referenced
on page 15 of the Agenda Information memo, there were five (5)
firms interviewed by a selection committee on Friday, June 16 for
the purpose of selecting an architectural firm to perform a Space
Needs Analysis. For a summary of the interviews and recommendation
by the selection committee, refer to a memo prepared by Assistant
to the City Administrator Hohenstein enclosed on pages 16A through
(o� Also included with the memo is a copy of the rating sheet
and questions that werq_iised by the committee during the interview
process.
The Space and Staffing Needs Analysis for the Municipal Center and
Law Enforcement needs, to include Fire Administration, will be
similar to the report as prepared for the Public Works facility
earlier this year.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Space Needs
Analysis submitted by BRW.
OLD BUSINESS
B. Consider Modification for Trailway Along Lexington Point
Parkway and Daniel Drive --Mr. Jim Jensen, who resides at 863 Rogers
Court, has requested information from the City on the safety of
bicyclists riding on trails or city streets. Apparently, Mr.
Jensen has acquired a report entitled "Effective Cycling" prepared
by John Forrester, who addresses reasons for cycling accidents.
This report is approximately fifteen (115) years old referencing
data acquired in 1974. Most of the study addressing cycling
accidents that have occurred on public streets where a bikes only
lane is designated and no off-street trail is provided. The study
also addresses only bicycles. Larry Billmeyer, an investigator
with the Police Department, has told Mr. Jensen in a letter, "It
was my opinion that bike trails were safer, because all the
information I had, including Forrester's report, says that
accidents on trails were bruises and broken bones compared to more
fatalities on the road. Also, most bike accidents are because of
rider error." He also stated that, "Forrester was dealing with an
old survey, and that a lot of his writing was his opinion. I said
that I was not aware of any accurate survey of accidents on bike
trails due to the fact that there are a lot of bike accidents never
reported." Mr. Jensen may appear at the meeting on Tuesday and
address a book called "Effective Cycling" that was written by John
Forrester. Our Police Department in their examination of
accidents, all of which were bike accidents that occurred in
traffic, feel that off-street trails are a much safer means of
bicycle, pedestrian and small children movement than no trails
causing the same kind of use to occur on the public street. The
study is quite lengthy, and if any member of the City Council would
like to glance at the report during the meeting, the City
Administrator will have a copy of the report and letters of
correspondence from Larry Billmeyer, police investigator., to the
Director of Parks & Recreation.
D. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to
Allow a 40 Foot.Tall V -Shed Billboard Advertising Sign --Enclosed
on pages O throughL-is a copy of the staff memo that
surveyed everal communities for outdoor advertising sign
regulations as requested by the City Council.
CONSENT AGENDA
L: Contract '89-14, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Water Treatment
Plant) --On Monday, June 19, a bid opening was held for the above -
referenced project. Enclosed on page opening
the results of that
bid opening.
Q. Contract 88-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedarvale
Boulevard') --While it was anticipated to receive the bids and award
the contract for the above -referenced project on June 20, formal
approval from the MnDOT Municipal State Aid office has not yet been
received precluding the City's ability to award the contract
without jeopardizing state funding for this project. Therefore,
it is recommended that this item be continued for two weeks to
allow the City to secure State Aid approval prior to contract award
thereby complying with MnDOT funding requirements.
NEW BUSINESS
E. Contract 89-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Armstrong Business
Center - Utilities) --On Monday, June 19, a bid opening was held for
the above -referenced project. Enclosed on page KIM are the
results of that bid opening.
/S/ Thus L. Hedges
City Administrator
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: JUNE 19, 1989
SUBJECT: SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS CONSULTANT SELECTION
On Friday, June 16, 1989, a selection team consisting of Police Chief Geagan,
Parks and Recreation Director Vraa, Assistant Chief Building Official Hanson and
ourselves interviewed the five finalists for the space needs analysis and
reviewed their respective bids for the service. Again those firms were:
The Alliance $71,905
BRW 34,640
Thorbeck & Lambert 36,380
Vanney Associates 33,676
Winsor/Faricy 41,832
All proposals exceeded the $30,000 budget allocation for this item. This
variance occured due to the unique nature of project for different cities. The
budget estimate was based on work done by similar firms for comparably sized
cities and organizations.
Being a contract for service the City is not constrained to the lowest bid, but
has broader latitude to select the proposal which gives the best service for
dollar value. The selection team recommends that BRW be selected to perform the
work at a cost not to exceed $34,640 and that additional funds be allocated for
this item. While all of the firms were responsive to the Request for Proposal,
BRW showed a better understanding of thework and brought an excellent
combination of competencies to the project when compared with the other firms.
BRW also demonstrated more experience than the low proposal. All members of the
selection team listed BRW as their first choice.
The group made, use of the attached rating worksheet and questions in the
selection process. If the Council has any questions in this regard, I plan to
be present at the Council meeting on Tuesday evening.
Ass stent to the City Administrator
L
PRESENTATION RATING WORKSHEET
SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
JUNE lb, 1989
Evaluator:
Firm:
Points Points
Possible Awarded
1. Responsiveness of the presenter to the
detailed scope of work. Assess understanding,
depth of preparation and completeness. 15
Comments:
2. Quality of proposal and presentation content.
Rate the written and oral approach of the firm
with a focus on substantive content. 10
Comments:
3. Competence and feasibility of the firm's
approach to the project. Rate the structure
and validity of the firm's proposed approach. 20
Comments:
4. Responsiveness of presenter to questions by
the review committee. Assess presenter's
knowledge of firm, proposal and scope of work. 10
Comments:
5. Relationship of experience to the scope of work.
Assess the firm's ability to perform the work
based upon previous similar or related experience. 10
Comments:
6. Qualifications and involvement of key personnel.
Rate the proposal on the incorporation of key
players including firm management and project
personnel with quality experience in this area. 15
Comments
7. Apparent value of proposal for the cost proposed.
Does the firm offer acceptable service at the cost
defined. If not the lowest cost bidder, does the
firm offer sufficient value above and beyond its
competitors to justify the additional expense? 10
Comments:
8. Ability to work with staff and Council. Assess
the firm's ability to work with key decision
makers for the City. 10
Comments:
Other Comments:
TOTAL 100
( W L
SPACE AND STAFFING NEEDS ANALYSIS
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
1, Will the named principal be involved in the day-to-day functions of
completing this project?
2. Having had an opportunity to develop an approach to the scope of work as
it pertains to the facilities involved, what do you intuitively expect to
be feasible design alternatives? In short, without prejudicing the
conclusions of the study, where do you think we may end up?
3. What size public safety departments, if any, has your firm done work for?
Will the people who did that work be involved in this project? How
familiar are you with the Minnesota Department of Corrections rules for
holding facilities?
4. What is the extent of .your experience in assisting clients in the analysis
and reduction of multiple alternatives as is outlined in the scope of work?
5. Which previous project or projects do you consider to be most similar to
this and how is this similar and different?
[ 0
COACHMAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT
DEHUMIDIFICATION
CITY CONTRACT NO. 89-14
PROJECT NO. 565
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1989
BID TIME: 11:00 A.M.
BID DATE: MONDAYS JUNE 19j 1989
CONTRACTORS
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Enviren - Con. Inc.
$
47,385.00
2. Paven Mechanical
52,200.00
3. Kumar Mechanical
61,500.00
4. P & L Mechanical
61,975.00
LOW BID
$
47v385.00
Feasibility Report Estimate
$
28,865.00
Engineer's Estimate
34,000.00
$ Over (+) Under (-) F.R.
+ 64.1%
$ Over (+) Under (-) E.E.
+ 39.4.%
Budgeted Amount
$
60,000.00
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
DATE: JUNE 19, 1989
RE: REVIEW OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED BY CITY COUNCIL
The Department of Community Development has reviewed the Sign
ordinance for size of advertising signs along major arterial
highways. The survey conducted of communities adjacent to major
highways varies from not allowing any advertising to permitting
Agricultural signs consisting of 750 sq. ft. Therefore, the
criteria runs fourfold in allowing the size of sign that the
community wants within the Sign Ordinance. The Department of
Community Development has also researched other ordinances which
would be more restrictive than Eagan's present Sign Ordinance.
In research submitted for review by Naegele Outdoor Advertising,
please find a map showing existing and proposed locations for
additional advertising signs. There are possibly three locations
in which additional advertising signs could be obtained on a
limited time basis. Since only three could meet the existing
Ordinance criteria, staff asks if we want to get into the full
review of the Sign Ordinance as it relates to advertising signs.
Presently, the criteria for advertising signs is: 1) must be
located in an Agricultural/Commercial zoned undeveloped property.
2) The spacing criteria must be 1,000 ft. from other advertising
signs and 300' from residential zoned property. 3) The property
be undeveloped and that no other sign be allowed on the property
such as a general advertising sign. 4) Also, that these signs be
300' from any existing pylon or general advertising signs for a
particular facility.
It has been determined that very few additional sizes can be
located in accordance with the Sign Ordinance so the Council does
have the provision within the Ordinance to allow only 250 sq. ft.
per sign and has the discretion to increase the square footage on
an individual basis as seen fit.
Staff would suggest no change in the Sign Ordinance at the present
time as it is restrictive in nature and will only allow very few
opportunities for additional advertising signs. The City does have
the discretion to allow on a "case by case" basis, the size of sign
over and above 250 sq. ft. at each of the proposed locations.
In the June 16 meeting with the Naegele representatives, it was
discussed that, at this time staff proposed no change in the Sign
Ordinance. Because of the few opportunities available to them at
that time, Naegele did indicate that they would potentially
negotiate some other locations to remove existing signs in order
IoO
to get this sign, as well as others, in the future. Staff has not
pursued any of the negotiations for the removal of existing signs.
If there is any concern to the Council on any signs within the
City, please make note as to the location and staff will be happy
to work with Naegele on the relation or removal of existing signs.
This should update you as to the status of the discussions with
Naegele. If you have future questions or concerns, please advise.
1 ) X-C) V
Director of Community Development
DCR/js
Attach.
fnq-�>
(STRONG BUSINESS CENTER
PROJECT NO. 569
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1989
CONTRACTORS
1. Ceca Utilities
2. B & D Underground
3. Channel Const.
4. Annandale Contracting
LOW BID
Feasibility Report Estimate
Engineer's Estimate
% Over (+) Under (-) F.R. & E.E.
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M.
BID DATE: MONDAY, JUNE 19, 1969
TOTAL BASE BID
$ 111,951.14
123,796.00
125,699.70
134,056.28
$ 111,951.14
$ 136,600.00
l5 FIA
136,600.00
- 18 %
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 20, 1989
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Tee Time In Eagan Driving Range/Request for Refund
of Sewer and Water Assessment Charles
Item 2. First Amendment to Development Contract/Cray Addition
Item 3. RTB Appointment
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1,. Approve Declaration of Covenants (The Waters Development
Lone Oak Addition)
Item 2. Grading and Excavation Permit #18-189 (Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant), Extended Hours of Operation
Item 3. Vacate Portion of Public Right -of -Way, Receive
Petition/order Public Hearing (Fairway Hills Frontage
Road)
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 19, 19.89
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Council reserves the right to hold an executive session
for attorney/client matters if requested by either the City
Attorney, City Administrator or members of the City Council. The
City Administrator would like a few minutes with the City Council
immediately after the meeting to discuss pending negotiations
between the Police Dispatchers and the City.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Tee Time In Eagan Driving Range/Request for Refund
of Bowe Water Assessment Charges --Enclosed on pages
through is a letter from Sharon Swenson, representing Tri nd
Companies requesting a refund of the sewer and water assessment
charges in the amount of $1,315 to Sons Construction. Tri -Land is
requesting that Tee -Time in Eagan not be required to pay for these
fees and that these fees will go with the land and be paid at such
time as the commercial property is platted per normal city
assessment policy.
It was determined by the City at the time the building permit was
applied for by Sons Construction on behalf of Tri -Land Partnership
that a trunk sewer and trunk water unit charge be assessed against
the project. Since Tee Time in Eagan is connecting to both the
City's water and sewer utility system it seemed appropriate that
a one unit assessment be collected.
Normally the City would assess this rate and not apply it to a
building permit, however, the total outstanding assessment against
the Lexington South Development is considerably higher and was
waived by previous City Council action until the entire property
is developed. This assessment will be a credit against the total
assessment toward Lexington South Commercial property.
ACTION TO HE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a request
by Tri -Land Companies that the City not require payment of the
sewer and water assessment charges in the amount of $1,315 for
trunk water and trunk sewer one unit connection until the
commercial property is platted and developed in the future.
l -YA
Item 2. First Amendment to Development Contract/Cray Addition --
Both Cray Research and the City of Eagan have agreed to amend the
development contract for McCrea Addition to provide for an
additional financial guarantee in connection with the installation
of water main laterals, sanitary sewer laterals and services under
the City's Public Project 89-E.
In order to amend the development contract the escrow requirement
must be increased to secure the full performance of the development
contract. The development financial guarantee calculations have
been prepared and are agreeable to Cray Research.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the first
amendment to the development contract between Cray Research Inc.
and the City of Eagan for Cray Addition.
Item 3. RTS Appointment --Liz Witt, representing the Mendota
Heights city council, has expressed interest in seeking the RTB
appointment. Apparently Jean White who is a member of the Prior
Lake City Council is also expressing an interest. There is no
action required unless the City Council would like to endorse Liz
Witt or another person of your choice as referenced in the
informative memo that was sent out last Friday.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Approve Declaration of Covenants (.The Waters Development -
Lone Oak Addition) --City staff has been working with the Laukka-
Beck Company and the Wachovia Bank & Trust Company pertaining to
their proposal to provide landscaping within the public right-of-
way and center medians along with passive landscaping lighting,
irrigation systems and overall street lighting within the Lone Oak
Addition development more commonly referred to as The Waters.
Because of concerns staff had pertaining to the future maintenance
obligations and related financial responsibilities for maintaining
these private amenities within public right-of-way, a formal
covenant was prepared addressing these issues. This covenant
states that it shall be the responsibility of the property
presently owned by Wachovia and that the City has the right to
perform any required maintenance up to, and including, total
removal if the obligated property owners do not maintain it in an
acceptable manner. All costs incurred by future City involvement
would be levied as an assessment against the affected property.
This agreement has been reviewed by the attorney's office and found
to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Declaration
of Covenants for The Waters (Lone oak Addition) pertaining to
landscaping, landscape lighting and street lighting and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
Item 2. Grading/Excavation Permit #18-189 (Seneca Wastewater
Txsatment Plant), Extended Hours of Operation --Enclosed on page
is a letter received from the contractor doing the earth
moving operations associated with the expansion of the Seneca
Wastewater Treatment Plant requesting that the extended working
hours previously approved for 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. be extended
from the previous estimated complet�i�(rn-o date of June 22, 1989, to
July 29, 1989. Enclosed on page t Uis a copy of the April 4
minutes. which did not specifically reference the June 22 expiration
date for the extended hours varianced to this grading permit.
However, due to the sensitivity of this project, staff felt it
would be appropriate to have the Council formally acknowledge the
extended deadline for this variance to the ordinance regarding
working hours. The Engineering Division has not received any
complaints regarding .this grading operation to date.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the extension of
the variance for working hours for grading permit EX18-189 (Seneca
WWTP) through July 29, 1989.
Item 3. vacate Portion of Public Right -of -Way, Receive
Petition/Order Public Hearing (Fairway Hills Frontage Road) --Their
presently exists a 28' public dedicated right-of-way for a frontage
road between Pilot Knob Road and Fairway Hills north of Camelback
Drive. With the final development of the Fairway Hills
subdivision, there no longer exists a need for this future frontage
road right-of-way as a public street will not be constructed within
it. Present City Ordinances require a minimum 50' setback from the
existing adjacent single family lot creating a hardship for the
highest and best development of that property. Subsequently, a
petition has been received to vacate this excess public right-of-
way. It would be appropriate to receive the petition and formally
schedule a public hearing to receive all comments and concerns from
any potentially affected entity.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
vacate a portion of the Fairway Hills
a public hearing to be held on July 18,
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
\8
To receive the petition to
frontage road and schedule
1989.
TRI -LAND COMPANIES
May 22. 198b
Mayor & City Council Members
City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan. MN 55121
RE: TEE TIME IN EAGAN DRIVING RANGE
Dear Mayor & Council Members,:
Towne Centre Professional Bldg.
Suite 202
1260 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, MN 55121
612452-7850
Tee Time In Eagan has now opened and we are extremely pleased
with the support of the Council, Planning Commission. and Eagan
City Staff Members in assisting us in making this range a
reality.
As this project was handled differently than other projects
within the City of Eagan we occasionally experienced difficultvf
as the parameters were not clearly defined for staff members. We
ultimately worked out all these issues. however, one item remains
that Staff and I differ on. Therefore. I would respectfully
request the that the City Council issue its opinion as to how
this particular matter should be resolved.
I am enclosing a photocopy of the building permit which was
issued by the City of Eagan. The builder is Sons Construction.
You will note that trunk sewer and trunk water charges were in-
cluded on this permit. Sons Construction contacted me and said
that these were not normal charges on a building permit and asked
for clarification. I met with Gene V,anOverbeke at the City Hall
to discuss this matter as the building department stated that
these charges were added per his direction. Mr. VanOverbeke in-
formed me that the charges are normally not part of a building
permit but represent assessments for availability of sewer and
water.
In my discussions with Mr. VanOberbak. I pointed out that the
City Council specifically waived platting for the golf range and
that they further waived payment of any assessments until such
time as any or all of the commercial project owned by Tri -Land
Partnership of Eagan would be platted. I further discussed the
fact that Patrick Road is a private Road which has not yet been
dedicated to the City and Tee Time hooked into the laterals which
are underneath Patrick Drive.
l3�-
May 22. 1989
Mayor & City Council
Page Two
Mr. VanOverbeke said that he felt that these charges should be
paid as sewer and water is available to Tee Time and that these
amounts will be credited after payment is made for assessments
which are levied on the 50 acre commercial tract. My concern is
that Sons Construction was required to make this payment and any
refund should go to them. Further,, it should not be the burden
of Sons Construction to pay for assessments as part of a building
permit. (This makes the cost of this building permit 18% of the
total cost of the structure. I reviewed another building permit
recently issued to Sons Construction and the cost of that permit
was 2% of the total structure. Certainly this is inequitable.)
I understand that these assessments will be a future expense of
this commercial development. However, as the City Council stated
that $11 assessments would be deferred because we did not proceed
with the platting on this property, I did not budget for payment
of assessment charges. I would respectfully request that the
City Council consider my request to refund the sewer and water
assessment charges in the amount of $1,315.00 to Sons
Construction. I would further request that Tee Time In Eagan not
be required to pay for these fees and that these fees will go
with the land and be paid at such time as the commercial property
is platted per normal City assessment policy.
Thank you for your consideration.
V r ruly yours,
daPoWlPens&on
SKS :alr
cc: Lee Bisel
Don Olsen
DING RANGE CITY OF EAGAN .ti 16433
6 STORAGE 9530 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21.199, Eagan, MIN 55121
.DING PERMIT PHONE: 454.5100 Q D�/
Receipt M t�• A
.beusedfor COl.HEgCIA1. Est. Value ;14-0C
Address 4260 LEXINGTON AVF
��— D Block Sac/Sub. 1;s:XIhQTQN POTNT
Parcel No.
Name TNT -LAND PARTNFkSHIP
�` Address X260 YANKEE DOOD F I2D
.City. EACAN Phor� 452-7ti50
11 Name - SONS rnNCTR11rTTDN
i Address 1174 ST ANng FV Rf Vi1
.City FACAN Phone. 442 -5 -ASS
ppppNW Name RRTAN AIIQTimr - - -----
uV Address 11,74 QT AWngFV R1 V❑
aW
City FAGAN Phone 452-1155
Chereby acknowlege the /have reAd thts`,applicai.m and stale -that the
'110mull.on is correct a�vagree bompl w /MI applicao;a State of
Mnresda Statutes and r pf E nOr di- ,ee�
000{{{ a:
SgrWum of Factoriesll�it`�
A Budding Permit is issued'.,lo: SON. CONSTRUCTION
On the express Condition that all work shall be donB in accordance with all
applicable Slate of Minnesota Statutes and Ciy of Eagan Ordinances.
9udoutg Obicial iiA,j`� tP14 I ti
acwancr
ZX -Q
(Actual) Lcnel
(Albraue)
e N Stories
Length
Depth
S.F. Total
S.F. Footprints
On Sile Sewage
On Sae Well
MWCC Syelnn
City Water
PRV Required
Booaler PUMP
FICE USE ONLY
pu
ifi60.On OCt ti'^�����
-Y-N
Blog. Fernut 154.00
i
Surcharge 7 -nn
-221
Plan Review 77 _ nn
12c
SAC. City 100.00
484
—4A4
SAC, MCWCC 575.pO
APPROVALS ilk StleCr
Planner
Water Corn ,C`L
1
Water Motor �
Acct Deposit
SWy Pemut ---20.&0
SW&H&Arge 1.OLf ;
Tnatmant Pl 22A_nn (j,(2rrrf�a L4.
1ba}llrut AS's nn u�IT 6-
Cduml 1Ysa1S.'"Si1(et a&""
ifi60.On OCt ti'^�����
aldg: 011. Cop,"
Variance TOTAL
2.477.00 i0�•
icl
RECEIVED JUN 16 1989
GIC611 � COOSTRUCTIOn MOWN
P.O. Box 458 - Northfield, Minnesota 55057 - 507-645-8962 612-333-1307
June 15, 1989
Mr. Tom Colbert
City Engineer
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant
Site Preparation
Dear Mr Colbert;
On April 4, 1989, the City Council granted Enebak Construction Company
extended working hours at the Seneca Project to remain in effect
until June 22, 1989. Our completion date for the project has been
extended to July 29, 1989.
At this time., we ask that the, extended working hours remain in
effect until the new completion date of July 29, 1989.
Thank you for your cooperation,.
Sincerely,
Dave Klee
Project Manager
t$5
"An Equal Opportunity Employer"
Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
April 4, 1989
SENEGA HASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT/GRADING PERMIT
City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council the
contractor was requesting that the hours of operation allowed by the
ordinance be extended to allow the work to be performed between 6:00
a.m, and 10:00 p.m. A representative from Enebak Construction Company
was present at the meeting.
Councilmember Wachter requested that the contractor refrain from
going through the residential areas after hours. Councilmember Egan
questioned if the staff requested any further conditions. Public
Works Director Tom Colbert responded that no further conditions were
requested with this application, but that the matter could be
evaluated if there were a problem.
Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve a variance
to the hours of operations for excavation/grading permit number
18-189 (Seneca WWTP) to allow the work to be performed between 6:00
a.m, and 10:00 p.m.,, subject to the condition that the contractor
refrain from going through the residential areas after hours. All
members present voted in favor.
POLICE DEPARTMENT/AUTOMOBILE CONFISCATION
City Administrator Tom Hedges distributed a memo regarding the
automobile confiscation by the Police. He suggested selling the
automobile and using the money for drug enforcement.
Councilmember Wachter suggested the City take possession and
perhaps the confiscated vehicle could be used to replace the City's
older automobile. Councilmember Egan questioned if the secured party
would forfeit its rights. The matter will be investigated.
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to authorize the
purchase of a 1989 Ford Bronco that is subject to forfeiture under
M.S.S. regarding the sale of narcotics. All members present voted in
favor.
MTC SERVICE
City Administrator Tom Hedges reported to the Council the
necessity to schedule a work session for April 17, 1989, at 7:00 p.m.
to discuss the MTC service area.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the
scheduling of a work session for April 17, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. to
discuss the MTC service area. All members present voted in favor.
"THE MORNING AFTER"
JUNE 20, 1989
"The Morning After" is an extremely brief report of the action that was taken
by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on June 20, 1989. There are
no details reported in this account; however, the action taken by the City
Council on each of the agenda items and each of the other business items is
reflected.
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
1.
The Annual Financial Report for 1988 as prepared by the firm, Deloitte,
Haskins 6 Sells was approved.
2.
The resignation of Scott Merkley from the Watershed Management Committee
and Gun Club Watershed Management Organization was accepted and
authorization was given to find an appropriate replacement.
K._C
awa
3.
A grand opening for Fire Stations 4 and 5 is scheduled for Sunday, July
9.
CONSENT AGENDA
4.
The Council was informed of the hiring of Lane Wegener as Engineering Tech.
.r—e_
Approval had been given to hire an Engineering Tech at the June 6, 1989
City Council meeting without an actual candidate being named.
yi5.
The Council was informed of the hiring of John Carlson as seasonal street
maintenance worker, which was approved by the City Administrator upon the
resignation of a seasonal street maintenance worker.
6.
Approval was given to advertise for a temporary receptionist for Eagan
Municipal Center beginning approximately August 1, 1989 for a period of
four to six months to replace Denice Mucchio-Grout who will be taking child
care leave starting August 1.
7.
Authorization was given to declare a 1977 Chevrolet Corvette as surplus
property.
1.
8.
Approval was given to renew service station permits for 15 service stations
which are named on the attached sheet.
9.
The following 6 trailer permits were continued until the July 5, 1989 City
Council meeting:
Tripp Oil Co.
Earl Maroltzke
Alwin 6 Lyle Schultz
Edmund Schwanz
Dakota Homes
Jim Horne
eezz
10.
Approval was given to renew the amusement devises for 1989 which are named
on the attached sheet.
11. A parade permit was approved for the 4th of July Association for the annual
parade that is included as a part of the 4th of July festivities.
R12. A message therapy establishment license was approved in the name of Today's
Concept of Eagan and message therapist licenses were approved for Kathleen
Maurer, Elizabeth Gangl and Robin Oxborough.
1%L 13. Selection of the architectural firm of B.R.W. 6 Associates to prepare a
space needs analysis for the municipal center, law enforcement and fire
administration needs was authorized.
AOL
14.
Approval was given to the City Code amendment to Chapter 10 regarding dog
and cat regulation and dog licensing as revised.
15.
Approval was given to a waiver of plat for B. H. Grace Corporation, Lot
1, Block 6, Vienna Woods for a duplex lot split to allow individual
ownership.
16.
Authorization was given to an amendment to the Community Landfill Abatement
_
Funding program to include: 1) a stump grinder as a capital acquisition
for the Parks 6 Recreation Department and 2) additional funds for the
abatement goal set at 98 to be used for payments to haulers if the City's
goals are exceeded.
17.
Bids were received for Contract 89-14 (Water Treatment Plan -
Dehumidification) and the contract was awarded to Environ -Con Inc.
18.
The petition for Project 575 (James Court -Streetlights) was received and
authorization was given to prepare a feasibility report.
19.
The feasibility report for Project 570 (Cliff Ridge Addition -Storm Sewer)
was received and a public hearing was authorized to be held on July 18.
20.
The plans and specs for Contract 89-09 (Johnny Cake Ridge Rd extension)
were approved and the advertisement for bid opening was authorized for
10:00 a.m., Friday, July 14.
21.
The bids for vehicle #219 (Sewer Vac -all) were received and authorization
given for purchase from Ruffridge-Johnson Equipment Co.
22.
The bids were received for Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Blvd -Overlay) and this
item was continued until the July 5, 1989 meeting awaiting State aid
approval.
t�
23.
The petition for Project 574 (Eagandale Industrial Park -Streetlights) was
++—
received and authorization given to prepare a feasibility report
incorporating the entire Industrial Park.
J�,,/JJ �''24.
A temporary gambling license to be used for pull tabs by the Firefighters
Relief Association during the July 4th celebration was withdrawn.
25.
A show license for a carnival and public show to the Eagan Lions Club for
the July 4th celebration was approved.
26.
A non -intoxicating malt liquor license for the Eagan Lions Club for the
July 4th celebration festivities from June 30 to July 5 was approved.
27.
The resolution restricting on -street parking for portions of Silver Bell
Rd 6 Nichols Rd for Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Blvd -Resurfacing) was
approved.
28.
A resolution restricting on -street parking for Project 533 (Diffley Rd)
was approved.
29.
Contract 87 -WW (Kindercare-Storm Sewer) for perpetual City maintenance
subject to all warranty provisions was accepted.
30.
Change Order #1 revised for Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition -Storm
Sewer) was approved.
31.
City Code Chapter 6 was amended by repealing a provision relating to dances
as presented.
32.
The amendment to traffic regulations section that adopts MSA Chapters 168,
169 and 171 by reference was approved and Eagan City Code Chapter 1, and
Section 8.99 was adopted by reference.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
33. The public hearing was closed and Project 569 (Armstrong Business Center -
Utilities) was approved.
34. The bids were received for Contract 89-15 (Armstrong Business Center -
Utilities) and the contract was awarded to the lowest responsible bidder
which is Ceca Utilities with the deletion of the sanitary sewer.
35. The public hearing was closed and approval was given to the vacation of
various street and utility easements located within the Whispering Woods
4th Addition.
OLD BUSINESS
36. The appointment of First Insurance to act as the City's representative on
all property casualty, liability and workers compensation insurance and
further to include and provide advise, training and other related direction
in the area of risk management was approved.
AftV 37. A trailway alignment along Lexington Pointe Parkway and Daniel Drive was
eliminated subject to the Developer relocating the trail around the west
and south perimeter of the Lexington Pointe subdivisions.
38. The special permit for Northern Natural Gas to construct a steel frame
building over the existing meter and regulatory facility was continued
until the July 18 meeting.
U39. Action was taken to deny the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor
Advertising to allow a billboard advertising sign in an LI district.
DaA 40. Authorization was given to a special use permit extension for General Pump
allowing a four month extension for their temporary mobile office.
12k 41. Authorization was given to an amendment to the special use permit for Tri -
Land Partnership to allow a miniature golf area in addition to the driving
�,, range.
[/ 42. The feasibility report's proposed design associated with the street
�� construction for Contract 89-16 (Sterns Addition) was approved.
NEW BUSINESS
43. The codification of the 1989 City Code Amendments was approved.
Q 44. Authorization was given to 1) the rezoning of 3.05 ag acres and 1.73 R-
3/PD acres within the Blackhawk Park plan development to an R-1 district,
and 2) a preliminary plat entitled Kings Wood 4th Addition consisting of
8 single family lots.
45. Two model home permits were approved for the Kings Wood 2nd Addition.
46. Authorization was given to 1) the rezoning of 2.54 acres from A to R-1,
and 2) a preliminary plat of 19.54 acres called the Woodlands 3rd Addition
containing 37 lots.
47.
Authorization was given to the changes to Chapter 5 of the City Code which
would include allowing off -sale liquor stores to be open on January 1 and
July 4.
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
Lase
48.
A request by Tri -Land Companies that the City not require payment of the
Sewer and water assessment charges in the amount of $1,315 for trunk water
and trunk sewer one unit connection until the commercial property is
platted and developed in the future was denied.
49.
The first amendment to the development contract between Cray Research Inc.
and the City of Eagan for Cray Addition was approved.
50.
The Council endorsed Liz Witt, representing the Mendota Heights City
Council, for an RIB appointment.
51.
The Declaration of Covenants for The Waters (Lone Oak Addition) pertaining
to landscaping, landscape lighting and street lighting was approved.
56. Preparation of a feasibility report for storm sewer improvements identified
as Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -storm sewer) was approved.
57. Payment #5 to Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition -storm sewer) was
approved.
.!� 58. All bills were approved and ordered paid.
52.
The extension of the variance for working hours
for grading permit EX18-
'
189 (Seneca WWTP.) through July 29, 1989 was approved.
53.
The petition to vacate a portion of the Fairway
Hills frontage road was
received and a public hearing was scheduled for
July 18, 1989.
54.
A petition for Project 577 (Austin Road streets
6 services) was accepted
and a feasibility report was authorized.
55.
A request for extended hours of operation on the
Pilot Knob Road Project
was denied.
56. Preparation of a feasibility report for storm sewer improvements identified
as Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -storm sewer) was approved.
57. Payment #5 to Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition -storm sewer) was
approved.
.!� 58. All bills were approved and ordered paid.
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
JUNE 20, 1989
1
Country 66
11
Finaserve, Inc.
3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
3150 Dodd Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Eagan, MN 55121
2
Total Petroleum
9
Cedar Cliff Amoco
4206 Nicols Rd
4600 Slater Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
10
Total Petroleum
12
Holiday Plus #234
2000 Rahncliff Court
4295 Nicols Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan;MN 55122
3
Superamerica #4049
14
Brooks Superette
Diffley a Sibley Mem. Hwy.
3390 Coachman Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55121
4
Superamerica #4182
15
Texaco Super Store
1406 Yankee Doodle Rd
1579 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
13
Superamerica #4335
1379 Town Centre Dr
Eagan, MN 55123
5
Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
6 Eagan E - 2 Stop
4195 Nicols Rd.
Eagan, MN 55122
7 Sinclair Station
394.6 Cedar Ave.
Eagan, MN 55122
8 Eagan Standard
4205 Nicols Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
\0i
License period:
July 1, 1989 -June 30,1990
1989 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
VENDOR LOCATION
Advance Carter Co. 4 machines
American Amusement Arcades LaFonda's
850 Decatur Ave. North 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
Minneapolis, MN 55427 3 machines
J. Doolittles
2140 Cliff Road
2 machines
3 machines
Richard's Food 6 Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
Schmidt Enterprises 1 machine
3600 West Shakopee Rd. Italian Pie Shoppe
Bloomington, MN 55431 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
Gary Starks over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121 3125 Dodd Road
Fred Sande
1561 Scheffer
St. Paul, MN 55116
Theisen Vending
3804 Nicollet Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55409
Brookside Vending
9845 Brookside Ave.
Bloomington, MN 55431
2 machines
Eagan Steak
1448 Yankee
House
Doodle Road
3 machines
Eagan Tennis i Athletic Club
3330 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Al Bakers
3434 Washington Drive
1 machine
Dougherty's
1312 Town Centre Drive
Broadway Pizza
2113 Cliff Road
1 machine
Pizza Hut
1 machine
1325 Town Centre Dr and 3992 Sibley Hwy
Davanni's
8 machines
1980 Cliff Road
Eagan Tap
3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
D.V.M. Company
over 15 machines
119 State
Cedarvale Lanes
St. Paul, MN 55107
3883 Beau d'Rue Drive
3 machines
Valley Lounge
3385 Sibley Memorial Hwy
3 machines
Richard's Food 6 Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
Schmidt Enterprises 1 machine
3600 West Shakopee Rd. Italian Pie Shoppe
Bloomington, MN 55431 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
Gary Starks over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121 3125 Dodd Road
Fred Sande
1561 Scheffer
St. Paul, MN 55116
Theisen Vending
3804 Nicollet Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55409
Brookside Vending
9845 Brookside Ave.
Bloomington, MN 55431
2 machines
Eagan Steak
1448 Yankee
House
Doodle Road
3 machines
Eagan Tennis i Athletic Club
3330 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Al Bakers
3434 Washington Drive
1 machine
Dougherty's
1312 Town Centre Drive
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
There are twenty-seven (27) items on the agenda referred to as
Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council wishes to discuss any of the itmes in further detail,
those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
A. PERSONNEL, ITEMS
Item 1. Engineering Tech — This item is informational; no
Council action is required. At the June 6, 1989 City Council
meeting„ approval was given to hire an Engineering Tech without
an actual candidate being named. This was due to the fact that
references were being checked and one interview was yet to be
held. The person to be hired was to be named later and was to
receive the approval of the City Administrator before a job offer
was made. For the Council's information, the person offered the
position and approved for hire as Engineering Tech is Lane
Wegener.
Item 2. Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker -- This item is
informational; no Council action is required. The City received
the resignation of a .seasonal street maintenance worker. In
order to fill this temporary position in a timely manner, the
City Administrator approved the hiring of John Carlson.
NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE ABOVE ITEMS.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY/CHEVROLET CORVETTE
B. Declare Surplus Property, Abandon Property 1977 Chevrolet
Corvette --A 1977 Chevrolet Corvette was confiscated by the Police
Department approximately 2'k years ago and is no longer needed as
evidence and, therefore, should be declared as surplus property.
The car was kept in cold storage in the. Old Town Hall building and
unfortunately, mice have destroyed the electrical system and some
of the upholstery. Despite its condition, the City will advertise
in several area newspapers to attract the highest bid.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize a 1977
Chevrolet Corvette as surplus property.
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
C. License Renewals for Service Station Permits --There are
fifteen (15) service station renewals in order for consideration
for the license period which is July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990.
Changes in service station permit renewals include Gateway Foods,
who purchased Brooks Superette and Crown Coco, who purchased Eagan
Service Center Union 76. Also, one new service station was built,
the Texaco Super Store at 1579 Cliff Road.
Enclosed on page In is a_ copy of the service station permit
renewals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve service station
permit renewals for fifteen (15) service stations.
000
5
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
JUNE 20, 1989
1
Country 66
11
Finaserve, Inc.
3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
3150 Dodd Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Eagan, MN 55121
2
Total Petroleum
9
Cedar Cliff Amoco
4206 Nicols Rd
4600 Slater Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
10
Total Petroleum
12
Holiday Plus #'294
2000 Rahncliff Court
4295 Nicols Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
3
Superamerica #4049
14
Brooks Superette
Diffley & Sibley Mem. Hwy.
3390 Coachman Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55121
4
Superamerica #4182
15
Texaco Super Store
1406 Yankee Doodle Rd
1579 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
13 Superamerica #4335
1379 Town Centre Dr
Eagan, MN 55123
5 Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
6 Eagan E - Z Stop
4195 Nicols Rd.
Eagan, MN 55122
7 Sinclair Station
3946 Cedar Ave.
Eagan, MN 55122
8 Eagan Standard
4205 Nicols Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
I
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
TRAILER PERMITS
D. License Renewals for Trailer Permits --The City code allows for
trailer permits under certain conditions within the City. During
the past several years, the number of trailers have steadily
decreased. There are currently six (6) remaining throughout the
community. Refer to page _j9L for a list of the trailer permit
renewals. Administrative Intern Walden has physically inspected
each of the trailers and researched minutes to verify the length
of time and any other conditions relative to the granting of these
six (6) trailer permits. For a copy of that information, refer to
page �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve those trailer
permit renewals that are in order for consideration.
TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
1. Tripp Oil Co.
3085 Hwy 13
Eagan, MN 55121
2. Earl Marotzke
535 Gun Club Road
Rosemount 55068
June 20, 1989
Permitted prior to 1970 and
remains in office use.
permitted prior to 1970 and
remains in use as a family home.
3. Alwin d Lyle Schultz permitted prior to 1970 and
1315 Carriage Hills Drive remains in use as a family home.
Eagan, MN 55123
4. Edmund Schwann permitted in 1980 and remains in
810 Yankee Doodle Rd use as a residence for Mr. Schwanz
Eagan, MN 55123 mother.
5. Dakota Homes permitted in 1,972 and remains in use
3660 Dodd Road as a sales office for mobile homes.
Eagan, MN 55121
6,. Jim Horne permitted in 1984 and serves as
3850 Coronation Drive storage for Mr. Horne's Historic
Eagan, MN 55122 Aviation business.
E
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JEFF WELDON, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN
DATE: JUNE 14, 1989
SUBJECT: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
On June 13, I conducted site inspections of the six trailers in
Eagan that are subject to permit renewal. I found all six of the
units still present and our permit records show them as follows:
Tripp Oil Co.
3085 Hwy 13
(office use)
Lyle Schultz
1315 Carriage Hills
(residence use)
American Homes
3660 Dodd Rd.
(sales office)
Earl Maratyke
535 Gun Club Road
(residence use)
Edmund.Schwanz
Dr. 810 Yankee Doodle Rd.
(residence use)
Jim Horne
3850 Coronation Dr..
(storage)
I also conducted a file -inspection of each permit and found that
none of them contain sunset clauses or conditional stipulations
that would be cause for not renewing the permit.
Dakota Homes is now doing business as American Homes either as a
result of the sale of the business or a simple change of business
name. There is nothing in their permit that alters the status of
using a trailer because of a change in business name.
Jeff Weldon
Administrat ve atern
JW/vmd`
cc: Liz Witt, Deputy Clerk
9
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
LICENSE RENEWALS/AMUSEMENT DEVISES
E. License Renewals for Amusement Devises --City code regulations
require the licensing of all amusement devises. A license period
of July through June is part of the regulations. Enclosed on page
is a list of those amusement devises that are in order for
renewal.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:. To approve the amusement
devise renewals for 1989.
0
License period:
July 1, 1989 -June 30,1990
1989 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
VENDOR
LOCATION
Advance Carter Co.
4 machines
American Amusement Arcades
LaFonda's
850 Decatur 'Ave. North
3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
Minneapolis, MN 55427
3 machines
J. Doolittles
2140 Cliff Road
2 machines
Broadway Pizza
2113 Cliff Road
1 machine
Pizza Hut
1 machine
1325 Town Centre Dr and 3992 Sibley Hwy
Davanni's
8 machines
1980 Cliff Road
Eagan Tap
3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
D.V.M. Company
over 15 machines
119 State
Cedarvale Lanes
St. Paul, MN 55107
3883 Beau d'Rue Drive
3 machines
Valley Lounge
3385 Sibley Memorial Hwy
3 machines
Richard's Food 8 Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
Schmidt Enterprises
1 machine
3600 West Shakopee Rd.
Italian Pie Shoppe
Bloomington, MN 55431
1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
Gary Starks
over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road
Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121
3125 Dodd Road
Fred Sande,
2 machines
1561 Scheffer
Eagan Steak House
St. Paul, MN 55116
1448 Yankee Doodle Road
Theisen Vending 3 machines
3804 Nicollet Ave. Eagan Tennis 8 Athletic Club
Minneapolis, MN 55409 3330 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Al Bakers
3434 Washington Drive
Brookside Vending 1 machine
9845 Brookside Ave. Dougherty's
Bloomington, MN 55431 1312 Town Centre Drive
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
PARADE PERMITS/EAGAN FOURTH OF JULY
F. Parade Permit, Application for Donald Clark/Eagan Fourth of
July Association --Mr. Don Clark, representing the Eagan Fourth of
July Association, is requesting a parade permit according to City
ordinance regulations for the Fourth of July festivit e,¢ For a
copy of the parade permit application, refer to page.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a parade permit
for the Fourth of July Association for the annual parade that is
included as a part of the Fourth of July Festivities.
I
Permit fee x$25.00
�_. i2�;e�9v�z9
Date: CITY OF EAGAN
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122
PARADE PERMIT APPLICATION
I, L' 1.++-k— lbn. _00w04444 5---, hereby make
NAME Last First Middle
application for a Parade Permit for 7-4-87 from
date
the City of Eagan. The sponsoring organization is:
NaM of Organization Street Address
E',.,t. M) MT -1 Telephone (GILD VS -Y -10 M7
Cit State Zip
Describe
.the route, the length, estimated
time of commencement
and term-
ination
and the general composition of the
parade:
�� n:_,v-�•
w,.tl S�_n"{ ik '� t(�
n I
C:, Zu,f�:L �'i 1�-L-�
s' �L �/
,t( S l Al /C AF V'- d l.,.0 �V.. kP�ac�c:A'+� •lel l/;3c
Authorized. Signature:
e Las
The Chief of Police will review the parade route, examining possible
hazardous or inconvenient conditions. He shall make arrangements for
alternate routing of traffic and any other traffic control measures.
His findings will be presented to the City Council. The Council may
deny or grant the permit, and/or add conditions including a date,time
or route.
For City Use Only:
Police Approval: Yes No
signed date
City Council Approval: Yes ( ) No ( )
signeda- to
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
MASSAGE THERAPY LICENSE/TODAY'S CONCEPT OF EAGAN
G. Application, Massage Therapy Establishment License and Massage
Therapist License for Today's Concept of Eagan --License
applications were received for both an establishment and massage
therapist for business to be located at 2105 Cliff Road. The
president is Kathleen Maurer, the vice president is Elizabeth
Gangl, both are applying for massage therapist licenses. Robin
Oxborough is applying for a massage therapist license and she will
be employed by Today's Concept.
The Police Department has conducted the investigation and find no
reason to deny the establishment or therapist license applications
as presented.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a massage
therapy establishment license in the name of Today's Concept of
Eagan and a massage therapist license for Kathleen Maurer,
Elizabeth Gangl and Robin Oxborough.
SELECTION/SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS CONSULTANT
H. Selection of Space Needs Analysis Consultant --A space needs
study for the Municipal Center Building to include law enforcement
and fire administration was authorized for 1989. The RFP,
prescreening and final interviews have all been completed for
selection of an architectural firm that would conduct the space
needs analysis. For further information on this item, refer to the
staff memo enclosed on page(s) /S'4+16
If any member of the City Council would like a copy of either the
initial SOQ that requested submittals of interest by qualified
architectural firms or the final request for proposal in which more
detailed information was requested, please feel free to contact
this office at any time.
As stated in the attached memo, a recommendation for selection of.
a firm will be forthcoming with the administrative agenda packet
on Monday, June 19.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To,authorize selection of
an architectural firm to prepare a space needs—analysis for the
municipal center, law enforcement and fire administration needs.
14
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: JUNE 14p 1989
SUBJECT: SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS SELECTION
Please raise for Council consideration the matter of selection of
a consultant for the City's Space Needs Analysis. As you will
recall, this item was budgeted for 1989 to permit the City to take
a comprehensive look at its current facilities and the potential
for remodeling or expansion to meet future needs in anticipation
of the City's continued growth.
The general scope of the work will be to consider the police and
administrative functions in the Municipal Center in the context of
the municipal property at Pilot Knob and Wescott Roads. The
consultant is to consider a no -build option, remodeling and
expansion, and a completely new structure for one or more City
functions. While the new structure is not considered a preferred
alternative, the study was designed to permit the consultant
flexibility to suggest alternatives in the event that the future
of all City functions could not be feasibly located at the present
site. All prospective consultants have been informed, however,
that the City has a bias toward this site and would prefer
alternatives which centralized functions here.
The City advertised for interested firms and distributed a request
for Statements of Qualification (SOQ) to thirty-one firms.
Fourteen responded with an SOQ. The statements were reviewed by
a selection committee consisting of Police Chief Geagan, Parks &
Recreation Director Vraa, Chief Building Official Reid and
Assistant Chief Building Official Hanson on behalf of Community
Development and City Administrator Hedges and Assistant to the City
Administrator Hohenstein on behalf of Administration. From the
field of fourteen, five finalists were chosen to submit proposals
through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Those were received
and have been reviewed by the selection committee. Interviews of
the five firms will be held on Friday, June 16, 1989. Those firms
are:
The Alliance
BRW Architects, Inc.
Thorbeck & Lambert Architects Ltd.
Vanney Associates Inc.
Winsor/Faricy Architects
The firms will be reviewed on the responsiveness of the proposals
to the RFP, their understanding of the scope of work, the price
submitted on the proposal and previous city experience and
references for the firms. Due to the lateness of the Friday
interviews, a recommendation by the selection committee will be
forwarded to the Council as additional information on Monday, June
19. If you have any questions concerning this memorandum or the
selection process, please let me know.
Assi ant to the City Administrator
JH/vmd
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CITY CODE AMENDMENT/DOG AND CAT REGULATIONS
1. City Code Amendment to Chapter 10 Regarding. Dog and Cat
Regulation and Dog Licensing --At the June 6 City Council meeting
a City Code amendment to Chapter 10 regarding the inoculation of
dogs and cats and other minor changes to the existing City Code
regulations was given consideration. There were several
suggestions raised by the City Council regarding the proposed
amendment and direction was given to continue this item to the June
20 meeting. Both the Director of Finance and Chief of Police have
reviewed the ordinance and taken into consideration the Council
direction. For a copy of their findings andre ommendations along
with the revised ordinance, refer to pages 16 through _ / .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the City Code
amendment to Chapter 10 regarding dog and cat regulation and dog
licensing as revised.
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBERE
DATE: JUNE 15, 1989
SUBJECT: CITY CODE AMENDMENT -DOG AND CAT REGULATIONS
Attached please find a proposed amendment to Chapter 10 of the City
Code. The revised copy has some minor changes from the ordinance
originally prepared on June 6, 1959. The intent of the ordinance
is first to allow the City to take specific action in cases where
dogs and cats are disturbing the peace and secondly to clearly list
the lack of a kennel permit where required as an unlawful act.
These two items are handled with the addition of the last sentences
in Subd. 10 and Subd. 13 of Section 10.11. The intent is also to
require rabies inoculation for cats and to allow the City to take
specific, clearly identified action in the case of animal bites.
These two items are A and B of Subd. 14 of Section 10.11.
Subdivision 13 is also modified slightly to remove any reference
to a license being required for cats. I believe that has always
been the intent, however, this subdivision was not properly
written.
It should be noted that without a cat licensing requirement, there
will probably be less incentive to inoculate cats against rabies.
The City's enforcement and utilization of that specific provision
will be primarily in dealing with cats being at large and/or in the
case of cat bites.
Additionally, staff was directed to consider two other changes to
dog licensing. The first was to issue tags when the application
for a license was made and the second was a different license, year
(May 1 from February 1) to allow for a consolidation of the rabies
trip and heart worm test trip. Both of these changes are certainly
feasible and could be implemented if desired by the City Council.
In my opinion both would have an adverse impact on the City's
rabies clinic, however. Tags are currently issued with the
completed application in all cases except at the clinic. It is not
done there so the process can move along as fast as possible. The
cost of additional staff if the objective of fast service is
important will probably exceed the current extra postage cost of
the subsequent mailing. To actually conduct the heart worm test
at the clinic will also require more time and staff. That
particular staff would have to be provided by the veterinarians.
We checked only with Dr. Hansen at the Eagan Pet Clinic who was not
particularly supportive of the change. If this concept is to be
pursued, additional research will be required.
Please let me know if any additional information is required.
U. V
Finance irector/City Clerk
ETV/vmd
Attachment
cc: Chief of Police Geagan
JUN 15 189 14:46 MRS 120 P02
ORDINANCE N0. 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAG'AN CITY
CODE CHAPTER 10 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY
AMENDING SECTION 30.11 REGARDING DOG AND CAT REGULATION AND DOG
LICENSING AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 10.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does, ordains
Section 1. Eagan City Code Section 10.11, Subd. 10 is hereby amended
to reads
Subd. 10. Disturbing the Peace.
it is unlawful for any person, as owner or possessor of a dog or
cat, to suffer or permit such dog or cat to disturb the peace and
quiet of the neighborhood by barking, howling, whining, or making any
other loud or unusual noise. Tr a dog Sr cat is disturbing the ,teace
for two or more hours, an ayAmal Qon rol officer, pglaco off icer or
community rgrvice officer may remove the animal and place it in the
aCitty,mand at the owner's eg- ns .
Section 2. Eagan City Code Section 10.11, Subd. 13 is hereby amended
to read
Subd. 13. Other Unlawful Acts.
It is unlawful for the owner Jju (1) fail to have the jlQg
license tag issued by the City firmly attached to a collar worn at
all times by the licensed A", or (2) own or keep a dog or cat which
is dangerous (any such animal which has caused injury to persons or
property shall be deemed °dangerous"), or (3) interfere with any
police officer, or other City employee, in the performance of his
duty to enforce this Section, or (4) fail to keep his dog from
barking, howling or whining, or his cat from emitting loud or unusual
noise, or (5) fail to prevent his dog or cat from defecating in or
upon public property or the premises of another, or (6) permit solid
waste of a dog or cat to accumulate on his premises for more than
twenty-four hours. (Z) Keep or own four or more dogs or cats. or
Section 3. Eagan City Code Section 10.11 is hereby amended by adding
a new subdivision to read:
126 P63
JUN 15 189 14:46 MAS
Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions
Section 4. Eagan City Code Including
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City titledeated
Violation' and
isectionn their ICS entiretynby reference 8asothoughsrepeanot"
hereby ado;ted
verbatim. This
EeDate. ordingdto 188@ shall take effect upon
Section 5•ffect
adoption and publication
AN
ATTEST:
By: E, 3, Vanoverbeke
Its: Clerk
Date ordinance Adopted,
CITY OF, EAG
City Council
Ey, Victor L. Ellison
its: Mayor
Date ordinance published in the Legal Newspaper:
a 1 -2-
and
for
are
its
Agenda Information Memo
June 26, 1989 City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/B. H. GRACE CORPORATION
J. Waiver of Plat, B. H. Grace Corporation, Lot 1, Block 6,
Vienna Woods, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership --The
City received an application from B. H. Grace Corporation
requesting a waiver of plat for Lot 1, Block 6, Vienna Woods to
allow separate ownership of,a duplex unit.
For additional info tion on this tem, refer to staff report
included on pages 6U through ?_.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a waiver of plat
for B. H. Grace Corporation, Lot 1, Block 6, Vienna Woods for a
duplex lot split to allow individual ownership.
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT# DUPLEX LOT SPLIT
APPLICANT: B.H. GRACE CORPORATION
LOCATION: LOT 1� BLOCK 6p VIENNA WOODS ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 20� 1989
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 9l 1989
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by B.H.
Grace Corporation requesting a Waiver Of Plat for Lot 1, Block 6,
Vienna Woods. The duplex currently under construction meets all
setback requirements and has separate utilities. Approving the
Waiver would allow individual ownership.
If approved, this Waiver shall be subject to all applicable Code
requirements.
Srrrwci�ar�� G'cr��f�criie
SURVEY FOR: R.H.Grace
DESCRIBED AS• Lot 1, Rlock 6, VIENNA MUDS, City or P.agm,,,lt,kota (hlmty,
Nilmcsota and reserving easements of record.
Parcel Ae That part of Lot Ir Block 6, Vienna Woods, according to the record plat
thereof, Dakota Canty Minnesota, lying test of a line drawl front a point on the north
line of said Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet west of the northeast comer thereof to a point on
the south line of sa
id Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet west of saltheast comer thereof..
Parcel B: That part of Lot 1, Block b, Vienna Woods, according to the record plat
thereof, Dakota Canty Minnesota, lying east of a line drawl front a point on the north
line of said 'Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet West of the northeast comer the, 4 to a point on
the so.lth line of said Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet west of the south•lst corner thereof.
VIENNA LANE
111.0 1410 94C 144.1
N
E
PROP ➢ CLETAT10C
et of toOn lrllen
• /q.0
Nqr rr
Re
• Ia:1
19o,
00, oc
11 100. 00
• /!A
ne, Aar •.mien [lar.
e so.00
Pyr
f
ge.eElnell:1.
SO.00
Enhtlnf Eleetlnnr
t3sl-----Ij--
rd
1
�
—a�
\\
O
I e
,
24.2
t75� MOO
..--
°L 0
eW1E
10.
6
JIWeE
18-00
1 IL 00 ji
.00
Imo°
10!00 a
a
q�
o
o
W 8
11
0
1EIn- }(
u /T
N
t,r
ENT"
i 50
0
°J
to 34.000
]400
It go
i z
li
O.0
PARCEL A
I
PARCEL 8 I 1
I
I
4D
sL--=----
-------�
SO.00
51.77
—
et of toOn lrllen
• /q.0
Nqr rr
Re
• Ia:1
Ouunt Fneear
•IRI
Ienrernt Flrt
• /!A
ne, Aar •.mien [lar.
-
Pyr
f
ge.eElnell:1.
0.0
Enhtlnf Eleetlnnr
0reingr 0lrnd len
Marin 0fhnt 111b
O
HEDLU D
Planning Enpinaarfng Sueging
waw raw ri.. • nrwnrs
r•r�iow�ui'
N90' 00'00' E 101.77
9
Jam_
N Iq anyIM. 1 I. L
OMrr N Tlewl
1 Lew EIaA Ill X10.0/ i
alit IE,YCI IEO11111"t
Front • 10 btu EIA • 10
SCALE: 1 INCH • 30 FEET Iher • 1/ wen ilia • 10
E Mra/T Willy IN01 Oft or"'. Nen a re•arl wee NNwOa ti rw JOB No.:
0r "W-1 ry alter N .hlw M 001 1 692- 118
Un/ aowwTff Mee We le•e of M ONE N Ylwu/10.
R-' la /C 7
cA/n ."%
OWGR^CM
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
AMENDMENTS/1989 WASTE ABATEMENT/RECYCLING FUNDI_NG APPLICATION
R. Amendments, to the 1989 Waste Abatement/Recycling Funding
Application --The Community Landfill Abatement Funding Program
administered by Dakota County has made available funds for
recycling program operations., administrative and capital
expenditures. Staff is recommending that the City Council
authorize amendments to the Dakota County 1989 funding application
to include 1) use of capital funds for the purchase of waste
abatement equipment. A stump grinder to be used by the Parks &
Recreation Department is deemed necessary and cost effective, 2)
the City has budgeted sufficient funds for the abatement goal set
at 9% and is capable of meeting its funding needs when this goal
is reached. The funds requested in the amendment are to be used
for payments to the haulers if our goals are exceeded. With the
rise in the City's population and a strong recycling participation,
staff feels the additional funding will prove necessary.
For City Council information, the capital revenue was allocated
over a three (3) year period and the City'samendment will use
available funds granted for 1989 through 1991. The capital
assistance portion of the funding was set over a three (3) year
period to allow for the flexibility to offset any additional
operating expenditures. There are no additional City funds
required for these budget amendments.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize an amendment
to the Community Landfill Abatement Funding.Program to include 1)
a stump grinder as a capital acquisition for the Parks & Recreation
Department and 2) additional funds for the abatement goal set at
9% to be used for payments to haulers if the City's goals are
exceeded.
aS
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CONT. 89-14 RECEIVE BIDS/.AWARD CONT.
1WTR. TREATMENT PLANT-DEHUM.-)
L. Contract 89-14, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Water Treatment
Plant - Dehumidification) --At 11:00 a.m. on June 19, 1989, formal
bids will be received for the installation of a dehumidification
system for the Coachman Road Water Treatment Facility. The
tabulation of bids received will be included in the Additional
Information packet on Monday. This project was rebid when the
first advertisement resulted in no formal bids being submitted.
Of those bids submitted this time, an evaluation will be made for
conformance to the City approved specifications and any deviations
will be addressed at the Council meeting on June 20th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 89-14 (Water Treatment Plan - Dehumidification) and award
the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
M. Project 575, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report
(James Court- Streetlights): --The City has received,a Petition from
seven property owners on James Court requesting the preparation of
a feasibility report for the installation of streetlights to
service the Slaters Acres Addition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition for
Project '575 (James Court - Streetlights) and authorize the
preparation of a feasibility report. ,
dal
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
PROJ. 570, RECEIVE PEAS. RPT/ORDER PUBLIC
HEARING (CLIFF RDG. ADD. -STORM SEWER)
N. Project 570, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing
(Cliff Ridge Addition - Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition
submitted by the Developer of this proposed subdivision, the
Council authorized preparation of a feasibility report which has
now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their
information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to
formally discuss the merits of this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 570 (Cliff Ridge Addition -Storm Sewer) and
authorize the public hearing to be held on July 18, 1989.
CONT. 89-09, APP. PLANB/ADTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS
(JOHNNY CARE RIDGE ROAD EXTENSION)
O. Contract 89-09, Approve Plans/Authorise Ad for Bids (Johnny
Cake Ridge Road Extension) --As a result of the public hearing held
on June 21, 1988, the Council authorized the preparation df
detailed plans and specifications for the installation of Johnny
Cake Ridge Road to its connection with Diffley Road along with the
installation of sidewalks and trailways to Cliff Road. These plans
have now been completed and are being presented to the City Council
for review and consideration of authorizing the advertisement for
bid solicitations. The consulting engineer and/or Public Works
Director will be available to discuss any specific aspect of this
project as may be necessary.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
specifications for Contract 89-09 (Johnny Cake
extension) and authorize the advertisement for bid
held at 10:00 a.m., Friday, July 14, 1989.
Im.
the plans and
Ridge Road
opening to be
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
VEH. #219/REC. BIDS/AUTHORIZE PURCHASE
(SEWER VAC -ALL)
P. Vehicle #219, Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Sewer Vac -All)-
-At 10:30 a.m. on June 15, 1989, the City received bids for the
purchase of a Sewer Vac -All vehicle for the Utility Maintenance
Division of the Public Works Department in accordance with the
approved 1989 Budget. Enclosed on page 30 is a tabulation of
the bids received for this piece of equipment. All bids will be
reviewed for the their accuracy and compliance with specifications
and any deviations will be verbally presented at the meeting on
June 20th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
vehicle #219 and authorize the purchase from the lowest responsible
bidder.
aCl
BID DATE - June 15, 1989
BID TIME - 10:30 a.m.
BID OPENING
SEWER VAC CATCH BASIN CLEANER
F0c
AMOUNT BID
OPTION 1 OPTION 2
1. Bovum Eaupiment $109.,999.00 $115,528.00
2. Ruffridge-Johnson Eqpt. Co. $103,898..00 $100,898.00
3._ MacQueen Eouipment $103,801.00
Budgeted Amount - $65,000.00
Agency Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CONT. 88-17, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONT.
(CEDARVALE BLVD. -OVERLAY)
Q. Contract 88-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedarvale
Boulevard - Overlay) --At 10:30 a.m. on June 14, 1989, formal bids
were received for the construction of an overlay on Cedarvale
Boulevard (Old Trunk Highway 13) from Nicols Road through
Silverbell Road to its intersection with Trunk Highway 13.
Enclosed on page ':VX is a tabulation of the bids received with
a comparison of the low bid to the engineer's estimate contained
in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held
on March 7, 1989. All bids will be checked for their accuracy and
compliance with the bid specifications and any deviations will be
verbally presented at the meeting on Jun 20th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Boulevard' -Overlay) and award the contract
to the lowest responsible bidder..
3l
STREET OVERLAY AND APPURTENANT WORK
PROJECT NO. 546, CONTRACT NO. 88-17
B.A.P. 195-122-03 MTB
CEDARVALE BOULEVARD
B.A.P. 195-108-03
SILVER BELL ROAD
FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CONTRACTORS
1. Midwest Asphalt
2. Bituminous Roadways
3. Valley Paving, Inc.
4. McNamara Contracting
5. Alexander Construction
LOW BID
Feasibility Report Estimate
Engineer's Estimate
$ Over (+) Under (-) F.R.
$ Over (+) Under (-) E.E.
BID TIME: 11:30 A.M.
BID DATE: TUES., JUNE 14, 1989
TOTAL BASE BID ALTERNATE BID
$ 281,235.80 $ 23,700.00
287,599.35 22,278.00
288,489.60 18,960.00
290,988.70 23,.700.00
292,494.08 21,330.00
$ 281,235.80
$'267,000.00
304,000.00 23,700.00
+ 5.3%
3a
7.5$ -0-
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
PROJ. 574, REC. PET/AUTH FEAR. RPT
(EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PR -STREETLIGHTS)
R. Project 574, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report
(Eagandale Industrial Park - StreetligLts)--The staff has received
a petition from Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and the
Opus Corporation requesting the installation of several
streetlights within the Eagandale Industrial Park. With the
Petition, a map was submitted showing specific locations for the
requested streetlights. While several of the locations correspond
with the City's standard for intersection lighting, other locations
were for driveway entrances to specific businesses. Yet, other
locations required for City in rsection streetlighting were not
included. Enclosed on page .3 is a map showing the location of
the various types of streetlights associated with this specific
Petition. The Public Works Director would like to briefly discuss
this Petition in further detail to receive specific direction from
the City Council necessary to prepare the requested feasibility
report.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition for
Project 574 (Eagandale Industrial Park - Streetlights) and
authorize the preparation of a feasibility report.
'L
'R
1
494
CCR TE c ®ROADI cy�C q�HM
TER CURVE I ®, F
AVALON AVE. 4C _ _ - ---
HI IV i KENNETH Imo— 44G�
ti F
Q Q Q a
_, coCOU X r RM£ �'
'Qi4 BEATRICE
N�
UA
�
a I Mc KEE
L 9� EAGANOAq :'� I=KErEARICT.� 4r ZIST.
a a I c� 1
o� z1
NIE Q ' �p WI ® C EXISTING STREET LIGHT
Q� �)� �1 ® PROPOSED PRIVATE
it ENTRANCE LIGHT
0 LONE OAR ROATJ
Q PROPOSED INTERSECTION LIGHT
RECONNENDED INTERSECTION
W ! A LIGHT
NMI[Mill
'L
'R
1
494
CCR TE c ®ROADI cy�C q�HM
TER CURVE I ®, F
AVALON AVE. 4C _ _ - ---
HI IV i KENNETH Imo— 44G�
ti F
Q Q Q a
_, coCOU X r RM£ �'
'Qi4 BEATRICE
N�
UA
�
a I Mc KEE
L 9� EAGANOAq :'� I=KErEARICT.� 4r ZIST.
a a I c� 1
o� z1
NIE Q ' �p WI ® C EXISTING STREET LIGHT
Q� �)� �1 ® PROPOSED PRIVATE
it ENTRANCE LIGHT
0 LONE OAR ROATJ
Q PROPOSED INTERSECTION LIGHT
RECONNENDED INTERSECTION
W ! A LIGHT
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
GAMBLING LICENSE/FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION
S. Gambling License,, Firefighters Relief Association for Fire
Prevention --The Firefighters Relief Association has made
application for a gambling license to be used during the Fourth of
July celebration with all proceeds dedicated toward fire
prevention.
It will be necessary for the City Council to waive the 30 day
review requirement with the State Gambling Board.
The application is in order for consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
temporary gambling license to be used for pull tabs by the
Firefighters Relief Association during the July 4th celebration.
SPECIAL NOTE: The Firefighters Relief Association has decided not
to pursue a gambling license at this time and this item has been
withdrawn,
CARNIVAL PUBLIC BROW/JULY FOURTH CELEBRATION
T. Show License, for a Carnival and Public Show, Eagan Lions
Fourth of July Celebration --The Eagan Lions Club has made
application for a show license for the purpose of a carnival and
public show during the Fourth of July celebration at Rahn Park.
The application is in order according to City ordinance regulation.
For /-additional information, refer to a copy of the license on page
_I -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON TRIS ITEM: To approve a show license
for a carnival and public show to the Eagan Lions Club for the
Fourth of July celebration.
35
351).00 Invescigation fee" Dace:
Q.2500 5250_ License fee
CITY OF EAGAN
APPLICATION FOR SHOWS LICENSE
]Shows: public show, movie,, caravan,
circus, carnival,exhibition,
theater]
I, h'Gt-3,,A1 -%, / (1,,VTOh/ , hereby make application for a
name
license from the City of Eagan , which
yT� oC ou
will take place on during the hours ofU.
1 �� i) hours
at �-�: '' � r(� %�/1. ? fi' ( /k.�i1. rL� The purpose of the event is
I— i7��CtiOn of show ,
LZ
I represent l`jI i
Names and addresses of corporation officers:
12 a:L, l_ L
p n e �J
lG : i JJ 9 J`S
hos (-:-:,L4 ;v A'E Y' I�Llg: 7 -1r -'z'7 -1r -'z' i;.f'
Person in charge
of event:
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: CITY OF EAGAN. Licenses are issued for a
specific period and will be issued to qualified individuals or firms
only. Failure to provide true and .correct information shall consti-
tute a violation of the ordinance in question and in addition to
penalties, the license of any applicant may be revoked.
Police Approval Date Cicy er pprovaa�
5.88
3(a
F�
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
LICENSE/NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR FOR SAGAN LIONS
4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
U. License (temporary) for Non-Intoaiaating Halt Liquor, Eagan
Lions Fourth of July Celebration --An application for a non -
intoxicating malt liquor license was presented to the City by the
Eagan Lions Club for June 30 to July 5 for the July 4th celebration
event at Rahn Park.
For a copy of the malt liquor license, refer to page :5,f .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a non -
intoxicating malt liquor license for the Eagan Lions Club for the
Fourth of July celebration festivities from June 30 to July 5.
3-7
DATE
CITY OF EACAN
NEW
ON SALE FEE
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD
RENEWAL -T —
OFF SALE FEE
EAGAN, FLINNESOTA 55122
TEMPORARY _
TEWORARY FEE $25.00
APPLICATION FOR NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIWOR
LICENSE
PLEASE PRINT
N(,R
,,d
Last
First
Middle Last
First
AJJress , X11• I .
l t 11 \i Cir\if
. �J-),ti F Address
!Nie
Stre.c
Street
I.I 1O,110
%)Vti
r>J/ old.C,cy
State
Zip City
Scace p
Phone�JI--`,I If
Birthdate r,
i /(1 Phone
BLrthdate
nr,l ,r.•� First Muddle
tdJress ' - J'I ' Il)i_ J Address
Street Street
City State Zip City State Zip
Phone 339 Phone Birthdate
for the year ;, ,
from.11,lnl( jh to �-L_l Ve�r- Event:Lf� 1 J l.iy� 3( l (/
mUnLT�ate mon ce or temporary License)
Location:. b)l 1 uO P/ )k'1•i Are you the actual proprietor? Yes ( ) No ( )
r. -ss
Are you the owner of the property of the business location? Yes (-�) No O
fi t 4
flus any ocher license of this kind been granted to. you? Yes( ) No ( ) Whereil(�
CL.!y,Year
Are any taxes, assessments or utility bills for the premises unpaid or dellqucnc'! Yes ( )
No (�). if yes, give reason.
During the past year, has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Lav
NS 304.AB02? Yes ( ) No (,): If yes, attach summons copy.
Have you ever been convicted? Yes ( ) No (..) City
(00,er thin a traffic offense)
Is this a Joint ownership or silent partnership? Yes ( ) No C )..- If yes, please attach a
listing of complete names, dates of birth, addresses and to numbers for everyone
rLnvolv_cd.
•BY VpEHIrY TIIAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANCE IN OWNERSHIP OR MANACERS IN THE PAST YEAR.
�N3EE IIE3LjDY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD EAGAN HARMLESS FROMANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR
INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS, WHICH TIIE CITY OF EACAN MAY INCUR
SON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE CRANTINC OF THIS 3.2 BEER LICENSE.
) HEREBY ACREE TO OPERATE SUCH BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND
HIE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EACAN. THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE
DES'r OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE � Cf �'t'✓\
First Full Middle Last
POLICE APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED DATED
21TY COUNCIL APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED DATED
---------- — f) ----- - — 9.87
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
RESOLUTION/SILVER BELL 3 NICOLS ROAD
V. Contract 88-17, Approve Resolution Restricting On -Street
Parking (Silver Bell Road i Nicola Road) --In order to receive State
of Minnesota transportation funds for the overlay of Cedarvale
Blvd. under the above -referenced project, it is necessary to pass
a resolution restricting on -street parking from the section of
roadway being improved. Previously, the Council passed a
resolution restricting parking for the Cedarvale Boulevard section.
However, part of this project incorporates Nicols Road from Beau
de Rue ,Drive to Cedarvale Boulevard and Silver Bell Road from Beau
de Rue Drive to T.H. 13. That previous resolution did not include
these short segments on either end of the project. Therefore, the
resolution enclosed on page WE has been prepared to comply with
MnDOT funding requirements.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution
restricting on -street parking for portions of Silver Bell Road and
Nicols Road for Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Boulevard - Resurfacing)
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution.
CITY OF EAGAN
NO PARKING RESOLUTION
Street City From 7-0
Proi #
MSA 122 (Nicols Road) 546 MSA 104(Beau D Rue MSA 122 (Cedar -vale
Drive) Boulevard)
MSA 108 (Silver Bell 546 MSA 104 (Beau D Rue T.H. 13
Road) Drive)
THIS RESOLUTION', passed the 20th day of June, 1989, by the City of Eagan
in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall .hereinafter be
called the "City".
WHEREAS, these,improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on
both sides of MSA 122 (Nicols Road) and MSA 108 (Silver Bell Road); approval of
the proposed construction as a State Aid Street Project must therefore be
conditioned upon certain parking restrictions,.and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in the
"City" has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking
of motor vehicles on the east and west side of MSA 122 (Nicols Road), and MSA
108 (Silver Bell Road) at all times.
Motion -made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated: June 20. 1989
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Attest:
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular
meeting thereof assembled this 20th day of June, 1989.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
10
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
RESOLUTION/DIFFLEY ROAD
W. Project 533, Approve Resolution Restricting On -Street Parking
(Diffley Road) --In order to receive Minnesota Department of
Transportation funding through the State Aid system for the
upgrading of Diffley Road (County Road 30) from Heine Strasse Lane
to I -35E, it is necessary to pass a resolution restricting all on -
street parking based on the current design being constructed.
Similar resolutions have been provided for other portions of
Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road suwrrently being reconstructed by
the County. Enclosed on page � is a copy of the resolution
required by MnDOT to secure State Aid financing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution
restricting on -street parking (Diffley Road) and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution.
CITY OF EAGAN
NO PARKING RESOLUTION
Street City
Proi #
CSAH 30 (Diffley Road) 533
From 7-0
Heine Strasse Lane I -35E
THIS RESOLUTION, passed the 20th day of June, 1989, by the City of ,Eagan
in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be
called the 'City".
WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on
both sides of CSAR 30 ,(Diffley Road); approval of the proposed construction as
a State Aid Street Project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking
restrictions, -and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in the
"City" has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking
of motor vehicles on the east and west side of CSAR 30 (Diffley Road), at all
times.
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated: June 20, 1989
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Attest:
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular
meeting thereof assembled this 20th day of June, 1989.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
+-1
Agenda Information Memo
June 201 1969, City Council Meeting
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/KINDERCARE ADDN
S. Contract 87 -WW, Final Acceptance (Kindercare Addition - Storm
Bever) --The installation of a storm sewer to service the Kindercare
Addition under the above -referenced contract has been completed
with all final inspections performed by Public Works personnel.
It has been determined that this project satisfactorily complies
with all City requirements and approved plans and specifications.
Therefore, it is in order for formal acceptance for perpetual
maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept Contract 87 -WW
(Kindercare - Storm Sewer) for perpetual City maintenance subject
to all warranty provisions.
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 REVISED/YORKTON 2ND ADDN
Y. Contract 88-22, Approve Change Order #1 Revised (Yorkton 2nd
Addition - Storm Sewer)--Yorkton 2nd Addition storm sewer provided
for drainage from that development to the existing storm sewer
system underneath.Becker Road installed with the UPS development.
However, when excavation occurred to accommodate that connection,
it was discovered that the existing storm sewer stub from Becker
Road had been severely damaged as a part of the reconstruction of
the MWCC sanitary sewer lift station at that location.
Subsequently, significant additional work was required to repair
the damage necessary to allow the completion of the project as
designed. This resulted in an additional cost of $19,634.
Presently, the City is working with the MWCC to get a commitment
to reimburse the City for these costs incurred. In the interim,
the City's contractor performed the work in accordance with City
directive and is entitled to payment through the City contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1
Revised for Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
43
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CITY CODE AMENDMENT/REPEAL DANCE ORDINANCE
8. City Code Amendment to Chapter 6 to Repeal Dance Ordinance --
Section 6.31 regulating dances has been repealed and discussed
since the 1989 legislature repealed statutory requirements relating
to dances. Ordinances number 71 and 79 will be inserted in
preparing the revision pages.
Enclosed on page � is a copy of the ordinance amendment.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To amend City Code Chapter
6 by repealing a provision relating to dances as presented.
q
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND
LICENSING" BY REPEALING A PROVISION RELATING TO DANCES'; AND, BY
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER,1 WHICH, AMONG
OTHER THINGS, CONTAINS PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES 'ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Sec. 6.31 entitled "Dances" is
hereby repealed.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled 'General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its
entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
Its: Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CITY CODE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 8/TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
AA. City Code Amendment to Chapter s for Traffic Regulations --The
ordinance codifiers are recommending that the City Code Chapter 8
entitled Traffic Regulations be amended by changing a provision
relating to adoption of the traffic regulation act by reference;
and by adopting by reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Section
8.99 which among other things contain penalty provisions.
Enclosed on page q2 is an ordinance that was prepared by the
codifiers and reviewed by the City Attorney's office that adopts
Minnesota Statutes Chapters 168, 169 and 171 by reference and
provides for a penalty provision.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment to
the traffic regulations section that adopts HSA Chapters 168, 169
and 171 by reference and adopt by reference Eagan City Code Chapter
1 and section 8.99.
4(.4
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE CHAPTER 8 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC REGULATIONS" BY CHANGING A
PROVISION RELATING TO ADOPTION OF THE TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT BY
REFERENCE; AND, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE'CHAPTER
1 AND SECTION 8.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Section 8.01 is hereby amended,
to read:
SECTION 8.01. MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTERS 168, 169
AND 171 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. Except as otherwise provided
in this Chapter, or in Chapters 7 and 9 of this Code, the
regulatory and procedural provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 168, Chapter 169 (commonly referred to as the
Highway Traffic Regulation Act) and Chapter 171, as amended
through Laws 1989, are hereby incorporated herein and
adopted by reference, including the penalty provisions
thereof.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable, to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 8.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted
in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
By:
Its: Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
q
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
A. Project 569, Armstrong Business Center - Utilities --On June 6,
1989, the feasibility report for the above -referenced project was
presented to the City Council in consideration of scheduling a
public hearing to formally discuss installation of the utilities
to service the Armstrong Business Center located within Lots 2-27
of Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. Enclosed on pages
through 3 is a copy of that feasibility report for the
Council's information and reference during the presentation to be
made by the City's consulting engineer who prepared that report.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all potentially affected property owners informing them of this
public hearing. The Public Works Director and consulting engineer
will be available to further discuss any aspect of this project in
response to any questions raised during the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve Project 569 (Armstrong Business Center - Utilities).
0
Report for
Armstrong Business Center
Utility Improvements
Project No. 569
Eagan, Minnesota
May 1989
File No. 49489
41
Sonestroo
Rosene
,., -�- Anderlik &
W.
�� Associates
LIIIV
Engineers & Architects
May 23, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Armstrong Business Center
Utility Improvements
Project No. 569
Our File No. 49489
Dear Mayor and Council:
Otto G. Sones000. P.E.
Rooen W. Rosen. RE.
Joseph C Ande3k. RE
Brddlald A. temberzy PE
Richard E Turner, RE.
James C Olson. RE
Glenn R. Cook RE.
Thomas E Noyes RE
Rouen G SCbaniChL RE,
Marvin L. Sorvala. RE.
Kenn A. Gordon. P.E.
RichaN W. Foster. RE.
Donato C. Burgardr. RE.
Jerry A. Bourton. PE
Mark A Hanson. P.E.
Rd K. Field, PE
Michael T, Rammann. P.E.
Roben R. Mellen. RE.
Da,d O Wskola, PE
Tnornas W Merlon RE.
Mkhael C. Lynch, PE,
James R. Maland. PE.
Kennm P. Ancerson. RE.
Kekh A. Bachmann, RE.
Mark R. Rath, BE.
Robes C. Russek, A I,A.
Thomas E. Angus. RE.
Ho asd A. Sanford. P.E.
Daniel J. Edgerton. PE.
Mark A. Seip. P.E.
Philip J Cart ll. RE.
Mark D Walla. RE.
Thomas R. Anderson. ALA
Gary F. Ryiander, PE.
Charles A. Erickson
l M. PaMlsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Ebedin, CPA.
Transmitted herewith is our report for Armstrong Business Center which covers
utility construction. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and pre-
liminary assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSE`NE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that. this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly ReisL=red Professional Engineer
under the laws of t State of Minnesota.
G' Mark A. Hanson
Reg. No.//'-,�-U
Approved 4:
De artment of Pub c Works
Date: 8
RPT49489
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636.4600
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main and storm sewer to serve Armstrong Business Center. Armstrong Business
Center is located on approximately 22.9 acres in the southeast corner of Lone
Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. Two large office/warehouses are pro-
posed to be constructed on, the site.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for
the City of 'Eagan. The project as outlined herein can beet be carried out as
one contract.
DISCUSSION:
A.) Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and size to serve
Armstrong Business Center presently exists in Apollo Road and Neil Armstrong
Boulevard. Sanitary sever proposed herein provides for extending sanitary
sewer to serve only the northerly building as shown on the attached drawing.
One sewer service stub will be extended from the existing main in Neil Arm-
strong Boulevard while an 8" sanitary sewer will be extended along the east
line to serve the easterly side of the northerly building.
B.) Water Main - Water main proposed herein provides for extending an 8"
water main between the proposed buildings as shown on the attached drawing.
The 8" water main will connect to an existing 12'" main in Neil Armstrong
Boulevard and an existing 10" water main located on .the east property line of
this site. Hydrants and service lines will also be constructed off the 8"
water main to serve the proposed buildings. Armstrong Business Center is
included in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience residual and
static pressures of approximately 60 and 80 psi, respectively.
Page 1
RPT49489
SI
C.) Storm Sewer - Internal drainage from Armstrong Business Center is tribu-
tary to the existing 60" and 72'" storm sewer in Apollo Road. The existing
storm sewer in Apollo Road is not adequately sized to receive direct runoff
from Armstrong Business Center without some detention ponding. As a result, a
storm drainage study conducted by Opus Corporation in 1987 designated ponding
areas in the Industrial Park for storm water retention. Although the study
has not been formally approved or adopted by the City, its data is presently
being incorporated into the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan Update. The pond-
ing recommended on this site is based on the Comprehensive Plan Update and is
being provided between the proposed buildings. The ponding details are listed_
below:
Pond NWL HWL Storage
Description Elevation Elevation Volume Outflow
Pond EP -10A 841 846.8 6.7 Ac.ft. 6.3 cfs
In addition to restricting the pond outflow a control manhole will also be
constructed at Apollo Road limiting the storm water flow into the existing
storm sever. The control manhole will include a 10" orfice restricting storm
water flow from the majority of the site to 9.6 cfs. A,small section of pri-
vate storm sever in the southwest corner of the site will be allowed to flow
unrestricted into the existing storm sewer in Apollo Road. The storm sewer
proposed to be constructed as part of this, project includes 30" to 12" storm
sever and is shown on the attached drawing.
EASEMENTS: Drainage and utility easements are required for this development.
A drainage and utility easement shall be incorporated over the easterly sani-
tary sever extension and the east -west water main through the site. Drainage
and utility easements are also required for the storm sewer proposed to be
RPT49489
Page 2
6i
constructed as part of this project and over Pond EP -10A. These easements
must be acquired for the project to be ;awarded.
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this
report in Appendix A. A summary of these costs are as follows,:
A. Sanitary Sewer $ 31,830
B. Water Main 51,100
C. Lateral Storm Sewer 92,090
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $175,020
The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingen-
cies and all related overhead is $175,020. Overhead costs are estimated at
30Z and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA
Eag,anda^le Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition
Lot 2-26, Block 3
Lot 27 (270-.03), Block 3
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property as shown on the attached drawings. A preliminary assessment roll is
included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be
revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over 10 years
at an interest rate based on the bond sale financing this project.
SANITARY SEWER_ Sanitary sewer ,proposed herein is lateral. It is, recommended
the sanitary sewer be assessed on a lct area basis to the existing lots in
Armstrong Business Center.
Page 3
RPT49489
S3
.WATER MAIN:. Water main proposed herein is lateral. It is recommended the
water main be assessed on a lot area basis to the existing lots in Armstrong
Business Center.
STORM SEWER: Storm sever proposed herein is lateral. It is recommended the
storm sever be assessed on a lot area basis to the existing lots in Armstrong;
Business Center.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below:
Project Cost Revenue Balance
Sanitary Sewer
Lateral $31,830
Lateral Assessment $31,830
$31,830 $33,830 -0-
Water Main
Lateral $51,100
Lateral Assessment $51,100
$51,100 $51,100 -0-
Storm Sewer
Lateral $92,090
Lateral Assessment $92,090
$92,090 $92,090 -0-
Page 4
RPT49489
S�{
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Complete Construction
Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due vith,Real Estate Taxes
Page 5
RPT49489
S�
June
6„ 1989
June
20,, 1989'
June
6, 1989
June
20„ 1989
Fall,
1989
Winter, 1990
May„
1991
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
A. SANITARY SEWER
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST'
6" PVC Sanitary Server, 0'-15' dp-.
L.F.
$ 12.00
200
$ 2,400-.00
6" PVC San. Sever 0-15' dp.
L.F.
16'.00
760
12,160.00
Manhole
EA.
1,000.00
3
3,000.00
Construct Manhole over Exist. Sever
EA.
1,,000.00
2
2,000.00
Bituminous Street Restoration
L.S.
2,000.00
1
2,000.00
Improved Pipe Foundation
L.F.
1.00
800
800.00
Mechanical Trench Compaction
L.F.
1..00
960
960.06
-=--=--------`---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
$,23,320.00
+5Z Contingencies
1,170.00
$ 24,490 00
+30Z Legal, Eng., Admin.,6.Bond
Int.
7,340..00
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER
RPT49489
Page 6
$ 31,830.00
APPENDIX A - CONT'D.
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
B. WATER MAIN
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
eeemmeemevea$�Q;seeeese
8" DIP Water Main
L.F.
16.00
1 41e0
22 560.00
6" DIP Water Main
L.F.
13.00
30
390.00
Hydrant
EA.
1,000.00
2
2,000.00
8" Gate Valve & Box
EA.
500.00
6
3,000.00
Wet Tap 8" DIP to Existing Main
EA.
1„600.,00
2
3,200.00
Fittings
LBS.
1.50
2,.900
4,350.00
Improved Pipe Bedding
L.F.
1.00,
500
500.00
Mechanical Trench Compaction
L.F.
1.00
1,440
1,440.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
$37,440.00
+51 Contingencies
1,870.00
$39,310.00
+30I Legal, Eng., Admin.,&
Bond
Int.
11,790.00
TOTAL WATER MAIN
$51,100.00
Page 7
RPT49489
S7
APPENDIX A - CONT'D.
PRELIMINARY'COST ESTIMATE
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
C. LATERAL STORM SEWER
+30% Legal, Eng., Admin.,,& Bond Int.
TOTAL LATERAL STORM SEWER
Page 8
RPT49489 69
$ 70,840.00
21,250.00
$ 92,090.00
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
a6p...... C'L.ps.$=
pepp......vv256ve0$e
30" RCP
Storm Sewer
F
4000
1,000.00
27" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
35.00
110
3,850.00
24" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
28.00
50
1,400.00
2,1" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
26.00
800
20,800,.00
18" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
24.00
490
11,760.00
15" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
20.00
66
1,200.00
15" PVC
Storm Sewer
L.F.
20.00
140
2,800.00
12" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
15.00
30
450.00
30" RCP
FES with Trash Guard
EA.
1,500.00
1
1,500.00
24" RCP
FES with Trash Guard
EA.
800.00
1
800.00
'12"RCP
FES with Trash Guard
EA.
500.00
1
500.00
41,dia.
Manhole
EA.
1,000:00
3
3,000.00
Catch basin Manhole
EA.
1,000.00
8
8,000.00
Catch basin
EA.
800.00
1
800.00
Control
Structure
EA.
2,500.00
1
2;500.00
Connect
to Existing Catch Basin
EA.
500.'00
1
500.00
Rip Rap
C.Y.
100.00
45
4,500.00
Improved Pipe Foundation
L.P.
1.00
200
200.00
Mechanical Trench Compaction
L.F.
1.00
1,705
1,705.00
-------------------------------------------------
Total
-------------------------------
$ 67,465.00
+51 Contingencies
3,375.00
+30% Legal, Eng., Admin.,,& Bond Int.
TOTAL LATERAL STORM SEWER
Page 8
RPT49489 69
$ 70,840.00
21,250.00
$ 92,090.00
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
A.) SANITARY SEWER
Parcel
Number
Lot Size,
Total Area
11.48
$2,.231
Description
of Lots
(Acres)
(Acre)
Rate/Acre
Cost Lot
EAGANDALE CENTER
INDUSTRIAL PARK
NO. 3
10-15, Block 3
6
0.60
Lot 2-8. Block 3
7
1.64
11.48
$1,390
$15,957
Lot 9, Block 3
1
1.23
1.23
1,390
1,710
Lot 10-15, Block
3 6
0.60
3.60
1,390
5,,004
Lot 16, Block,3
1
0.67
0.67
1,390
931
Lot 17-26, Block
3 10
0.55
5.50
1,390
7,645
Lot 27 (270-03),
Blk.. 3 1
0.42
0.42
1,390
583'
22.9
$31,830
B.) WATER MAIN
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3
Lot
2-8, Block 3
7
1.64
11.48
$2,.231
$25,617
Lot
9„ Block 3
1
1.23
1.23
2,231
2,745
Lot
10-15, Block 3
6
0.60
3.60
2,231
8,033
Lot
16, Block 3
1
0.67
0.67
2,.231
1,495
Lot
17-26, Block 3
10
0.55
5.50
2,231
12,273
Lot
27 (270-03), Block 3
1
0.42
0.42
2,231
937
22.9
$51,100
C.) STORM SEWER
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3
Lot
2-8, Block 3
7
1.64
11.48
$4,.021
$46,166
Lot
9, Block 3
1
1.,23
1.23
4,021
4,946
Lot
10-15, Block 3
6
0.60
3.60
4,021
14,477
Lot
16. Block 3
1
0.67
0.67
4,021
2,694
Lot
17-26, Block 3
10
0..55
5.50
4,021
22,118
,Lot
27 (270-03`), Blk. 3
1
0•.42
0.42
4,021
1,.689
22.9
$92,090
Page 9
RPT49489
6-7
SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS•CENTER
PROJECT NO. 569
COST/LOT
Parcel Sanitary
Description Sewer
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR NO. 3
Lot 2-8., Block 3 $2,280
Lot 9, Block3 1,710
Lot 10-15, Block 3 834
Lot 16, Block 3 931
Lot 17-26, Block 3 765
Lot 27 (270-03), Blk. 3 583
RPT49489
Water
Storm
Total
Main
Sewer
Coat Lot
$3„660
$6,595
$12,535
2,745
4,946
9,401
1,339
2,413
4,586
1,495
2,694
5,120
1,227
2,212
4,,204
937
1,689
3,,,209
Page10
(--0 v
I,I
Z II,
`' �I i LONE OAK RD
4
13
z_/—_---
II
-------�
L------------- —4JF I
N
1
1�
51/24/89
! \I
m. 49489
E" PVC
SANITARY
1,
SEWER
SERVICE
I
I II
p
1-------------� 1 I I I
I II I
JSIS
------------
-----8"
8" PVC SANITY I
I
I
SEw'ER I I I
%
r------------ I
L
! l
JI !
~L---------------
i F=`- j-':?`. 1—�E------ J]
4
13
1` 1 1 i
I
10
�
9
8
N
1
1�
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS
CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY IMPROVEMENTS
IM
f
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderllk 8
Aeeoclates
51/24/89
Com
m. 49489
SCALE: 1" = 200'
Enpl"orn
SL hut, YlneMelU
Fig. No.
12
Y I'r 2
I,I
I
z III
p III
,' LONE OAK RD
----------------------
�
4I /
i
I
I II II' I I L-- —J l I I o
I I I I I I I I I If
L----
Z I I I
-- � I
II I I I I I I j f I
8"j. DIP WATER — I IQ I I L
I I y I l r-----------� J I I I
v fl �I I
)III ------------L -F ------------ I
fi it L --------------- A!AR-OLLO-RD------ J1 C
28
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS Ronestroo
Roeene
CENTER Anderllk 6
Associates
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Dote: 5/24/89
Comm. 49489
Z
SCALE: 1 = 200
Enpin m &Archit"10
at. hu{ MlnnMpta
Fig. No. 2
N
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
1
15
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS Ronestroo
Roeene
CENTER Anderllk 6
Associates
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Dote: 5/24/89
Comm. 49489
Z
SCALE: 1 = 200
Enpin m &Archit"10
at. hu{ MlnnMpta
Fig. No. 2
►A
s
LONE OAK RD
2
14
II-L3di\'r—RCP
12
iII
I,I
2
�II
O
tltl�I
iI
LONE OAK RD
2
14
II-L3di\'r—RCP
-------
STORM— — —�
41
— `---------------
STORM SEWER (BY OTHERS)
X
15" RCP STORM
�' IZ
1
L------------
I I
I STORM (BY OTHERS) 21" RCP STOR
II 18 IRCP STORM I
Ij
i
12" RCP STORM I
----- ORM
I � I r--- � I
A
I
L -7I�^ PONT EP
y�
z
NWL - 641.0
O
I`
i'I 4
I HWL - 646!6.
STORAGE - 617 AC. Ff.
�r-- ---- ---- r --, �
k30L�
�27!j
II
IRCP4STORMI--------- I
I I
�I
I
I
,I 1 REP STORIJ
I
I
I _
21" RCP STORM
) I
I CONTROL MH
I
�----I--- 1 ORFICEI
/
II
L ----------------- n',APlLt0—RD -----
--
14 18" RCP
III
STORM
i I I 15 13 12 11 10 g 8
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS 1 Bonestroo
Rosene
CENTER AnderllkA
Associates
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
STORM SEINER C"m 5/24/
89
CeTnm. 494489
(p3
28
N
I
LE: 1" = 200'
BL P" Mlnnewla
Fig. No. 3
•M17 .4='
Agenda Information Memo
June 20., 1989, City Council Meeting
VACATION/WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDN
B. vacate Utility Easements,
response to a petition received o
scheduled a public hearing to
discuss the vacating of several u
street easement located within the
(at e ispering Woods 4th Addition.
re copies of the affected e
descriptions. These easements a -
by new dedications incorporated i_
final plat approval on June 6. A
the legal newspaper and sent to
companies as well as reviewed by
of this date, the staff has not
proposed vacation.
Whispering Woods 4th Addition --In
n May 10, 1989, the City Council
be held on June 20 to formally
tility easements and a temporary
property recently replatted into
Enclosed on pages �S through
asements with their related legal
11 have been adequately replaced
n the 4th Addition which received
11 notices have been published in
ail potentially affected utility
the Public Works Department. As
receivedany objections to the
ACTION TO BE, CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing,
and approve the vacation of various street and utility easements
located within the Whispering Woods 4th Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
ca 4
r
-4
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
T4�E N.W. C.4# :ER OF P/.RCEL 4,_
0AWWe5,.7h. °t,. . OF TQGNypo2.-
-fnTl°N 9ru&RT PF WAT PLAT No, t9 -1Z.
IJQP-TN LINE of THE 1
NW'/A =F t.w 1/4 1
-y6[., 31,T Z-7, 5L Z3
y-NB9.53,4Z W
' •3ss,00 --,
- o
9 '^
� N'I
,
z -
A drainage and utility easementp
over that part of the NWt of the z 47 ,7
SWI of Section 31, Township 27, v °`
Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota, di
d6scribed as follows; to n
Commencing at the northwest corner
of Parcel 4,
IL
y J�,
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF'
U
all
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No.
JAI d
m
19-12, according to She recorded plat
.3
;a
I
thereof; thence N 89 53'42" W along
o
d'd
the north line of said NWA of the
_;
,}
=
SWt a distance of 355.00 feet; thence
a
S 0°06'18" W a distance of 135.00
=I!
feet; thence S 35 18'10" Woe. distance
"
Q
of 73.43 feet; thence S 11°21'45" W
/ Q
a distance of 114.42 feet to the
O
point of, beginning of the parcel to
be d8scribed;
r
/
thence continuing
•�
S 11 21'45" W a distance of 151 22
feet; thence S 2°00'56" E a distance sNoi"'
of 126.61 feet; thence N 76038'22" W •p P'/ ; _-�
a distance of 41.48 feet; thence
N 2 00'56" W a digtance of 120.29 ?; W 4
N '
feet; thence N 11 21'4$" E a dis- f n _
tancS of 58.91 feet; thence w
N 33 46'20" E a distance of 104,93 rn
feet to the point of beginning and ,V W w ; :--.4kJ
there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.
Dater /L 0—A 14, 1567—Q�/%, ./L'. C�✓
LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
(05
y J�,
JAI d
Uoi
I
N N I 7 O N
,1 ,
h1O R.T H I ,
_;
Sr ALC— I" s&c?' '1"-40
=
�j
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.
Dater /L 0—A 14, 1567—Q�/%, ./L'. C�✓
LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
(05
EXHIBIT A
NO2TFF
SALE P•y0"
S 89'53'
T,1E elo1TNjff4T .00IJEL
DF DAPLeL A, NILLLLV.Oft�
CePna'TMc1r d= TGMI I$•
t.4mTAT,ot4 RII"NT OF VA.,
.PLAT NO. 110-12.
c � ( (• ►bAtN 4,12@ or
�. °-•,, TME Mw.!,, q jwl�l
'SEL. $11,7 271 R L3
N. W Sw 4L•w
' 4-
t Z
S '.� g Q•
3 Q
• T E• � CQ�• � I O � �' f�
,st a10 a
1 VI a. V) 1
1
OSP
ST
-- • 120,00 4 _.
` M ee. 5'$'42"W
v
I
EASEMENT DESCRIi'TION '
That part of the NW} of the SW}. o: Section 31,
Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota,
described as -follows,
Commencing at the northwest corner of Parcel. 4-,
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT O1'' TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF
WAY PLAT No. 19-12, accor$ing tothe recorded
plat thereof; thence N 89 13142" W along the north
lino ofeaid NW},of the SW• a distance of 355,40
feett thence S 0606'18!' W a distance of 1-35-,00,
feet to thepoint of bgginning of the parcel to be
described) thence S 35 18"10"W a distance of x.9,45
feet; ,thence N 8$053'442" W a distance of 120.00
feet.; thenc8 N 0 06"18" E a distance of 114,87 feett
thence 5 89 53'42" E a distance of 84.45 feett
thence S 44053'42" E a distance of 77.59 feet's
thence S 89 053142" E a distance of '23.00 feet to
the point o1'' beginning and there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by ma or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State if Minnesota.
Datel,/qmW,r% 10 11JZ ��
RECEIVED FEB 13 W7 + LeRoy N. ''Bohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
M
s_
4
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by ma or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State if Minnesota.
Datel,/qmW,r% 10 11JZ ��
RECEIVED FEB 13 W7 + LeRoy N. ''Bohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
M
'�• E%III9IT A
N
T o
NORTH
S�AL_E- 1.1 a so,
/OG
THE "VWTVkWelT 44%"Wn.
ep VARCeL 4, MIud CA OTA.
bap"'' WIE.T eF T4Auy-
PnRTATod SUUWT of WAY
PUAT we. 19-M
NORTH LINE a ,
TNe NW 14 a 5W 4,
jeL.31,T19.0.15
i
1.5 L 1 40
II
01
%PI
f11� loin
ea
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION 1 I I .v N
f n_
A 15.00 foot drainage and utility easement
over that part of the NWS of the SWI of
ral
�i
0
a
0
Section 31. Township 27, Range 23, Dakota I V $s E
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said I,,I I'{ ;26•`.0 '
15.00 foot easement is described as follows
Commencing at the northwest corner of
Parcel 4, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS-
PORTATION RICHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12, /
according tg the recorded plat thereof)
thence N 89 53'42" W along the north line
of said NWI of t�e SWI a distance of 355.00
feet) thence S 0 06'18" W a distance of
135.00 feet; thence S 35 1p'10" W a distance
of 73,43 feet; thence S 11 b21'4�^ W a dis-
tance of 92.00 feet; thence S 8 10'55" E
a distance of 21.13 feet to the point of
beginning 8f the centerline to be described;
thence N 8810155" W along said centerline a
distance of 268.95 feet; thence N 78 09'20" W
along said centerline a distance of 155.76
feet and there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State //oof�f Minnesota.
RECEIVED FEB 1 3 19e7�—' LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
U
iI
cc
-Slp
1
aL
bM�
I
Am10pp
�
1 .
NII
I
e?� I
z
:I
i
1.5 L 1 40
II
01
%PI
f11� loin
ea
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION 1 I I .v N
f n_
A 15.00 foot drainage and utility easement
over that part of the NWS of the SWI of
ral
�i
0
a
0
Section 31. Township 27, Range 23, Dakota I V $s E
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said I,,I I'{ ;26•`.0 '
15.00 foot easement is described as follows
Commencing at the northwest corner of
Parcel 4, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS-
PORTATION RICHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12, /
according tg the recorded plat thereof)
thence N 89 53'42" W along the north line
of said NWI of t�e SWI a distance of 355.00
feet) thence S 0 06'18" W a distance of
135.00 feet; thence S 35 1p'10" W a distance
of 73,43 feet; thence S 11 b21'4�^ W a dis-
tance of 92.00 feet; thence S 8 10'55" E
a distance of 21.13 feet to the point of
beginning 8f the centerline to be described;
thence N 8810155" W along said centerline a
distance of 268.95 feet; thence N 78 09'20" W
along said centerline a distance of 155.76
feet and there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State //oof�f Minnesota.
RECEIVED FEB 1 3 19e7�—' LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
U
-No +10a7NWe0 em"Ta.
op ea4v6 4, MoNff#PTI.
bel "Tweav d T4M.n-
goes"*Y IUAWT iR wK1
V,hT we, 19•I1L-
1 A
1 61NE o6 ,
14 e6 6W,4.
lI,T27, R=�
�• 35S.00 •`• _
N otz-r
\�i'\� • � ate,
Z
01 1
EASI?.rENT7ES2RIPTION L 1J1 ' Sn
A 15.00 fooet drainage and utility easoment 1, 1 0.
over that pa_t of the N'.J} of .he S'1:'j, of I
O -
Q
14)
U
3
w
Off!
Section 71, Township 27. Range 27, Dakota
County, Minnueota, Che centerline of said 1 .'. = 1 �•D.
15•oo foot eusament Ss described as folLows+ 1 ;'V1 5
Commencing at tho northwest corner of .1 e's\0 ?
Parcel 4, MIIINF.SoTA DEW.RTMENT OF TRANS-
IPJRTATI(:N RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12,
according t8 the recordrd plat thrraoft
thence N 89 57'4'2- 11 alcrig tl-.v north line
of said NW ;f the S J a distance of 755.0') I
feeti thence S o 06218" 9 a dintanc•± o1'
17].00 feet thence S 7: 18110" 1.1 a di^'..n1"O 111
of 77.47 feed theme.S 13021'-4�" A a d).j-• -
tante of 92.00 fee -1 C1lence S 8 1(1'55," 1.
a distance of•11.11 fent io the pcint c1-
be€innin.g 8f tEe cunterlino to ba descr'bedl
thence N 8 10'55" ►I along said c.:rterlille a
dintaned of 137.57 feed thence N 161'18'57' M
along 0;114 centerhine a distance of 148.12
Sea#1 thence N 72 46,'•57" W R10119 said center-
line a'.fietah3e•of 124.47.feet 'and there term,.tating.
r,.,•.
. .. .; ..
I,hergby, certify th:.t this survey weN presfired by me or
ered
.,w :,y. wTYy v4 .•...,
uridei'T!i' dliSCt''suCErbSeion and+that I. am.-a'd'1SY.. Regio]
-""' •—
-Land Surveyocundcr.the laws of/the Stat
e ^ Mtnneeota.
Date1� 2t ff.7 p', —
"`'"i�—� LeRoy IMonlen
RE%i14EV 4 -1 -SI Regiat,)red Land Surveyor No. 10795
7
\t`''\
a t
1g�1'\
AM
1 61NE o6 ,
14 e6 6W,4.
lI,T27, R=�
�• 35S.00 •`• _
N otz-r
\�i'\� • � ate,
Z
01 1
EASI?.rENT7ES2RIPTION L 1J1 ' Sn
A 15.00 fooet drainage and utility easoment 1, 1 0.
over that pa_t of the N'.J} of .he S'1:'j, of I
O -
Q
14)
U
3
w
Off!
Section 71, Township 27. Range 27, Dakota
County, Minnueota, Che centerline of said 1 .'. = 1 �•D.
15•oo foot eusament Ss described as folLows+ 1 ;'V1 5
Commencing at tho northwest corner of .1 e's\0 ?
Parcel 4, MIIINF.SoTA DEW.RTMENT OF TRANS-
IPJRTATI(:N RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12,
according t8 the recordrd plat thrraoft
thence N 89 57'4'2- 11 alcrig tl-.v north line
of said NW ;f the S J a distance of 755.0') I
feeti thence S o 06218" 9 a dintanc•± o1'
17].00 feet thence S 7: 18110" 1.1 a di^'..n1"O 111
of 77.47 feed theme.S 13021'-4�" A a d).j-• -
tante of 92.00 fee -1 C1lence S 8 1(1'55," 1.
a distance of•11.11 fent io the pcint c1-
be€innin.g 8f tEe cunterlino to ba descr'bedl
thence N 8 10'55" ►I along said c.:rterlille a
dintaned of 137.57 feed thence N 161'18'57' M
along 0;114 centerhine a distance of 148.12
Sea#1 thence N 72 46,'•57" W R10119 said center-
line a'.fietah3e•of 124.47.feet 'and there term,.tating.
r,.,•.
. .. .; ..
I,hergby, certify th:.t this survey weN presfired by me or
ered
.,w :,y. wTYy v4 .•...,
uridei'T!i' dliSCt''suCErbSeion and+that I. am.-a'd'1SY.. Regio]
-""' •—
-Land Surveyocundcr.the laws of/the Stat
e ^ Mtnneeota.
Date1� 2t ff.7 p', —
"`'"i�—� LeRoy IMonlen
RE%i14EV 4 -1 -SI Regiat,)red Land Surveyor No. 10795
7
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
A. Appointment of City Insurance Representative --At the June 6,
1989 City Council meeting consideration was given to the
appointment of the City insurance representative to begin July 1,
1989. The Finance Committee, City Councilmembers Egan and McCrea,
Director of Finance and City Administrator interviewed three (3)
firms on June 2, 1989 all of whom were considered for the
appointment as the City's insurance representative. Action to
appoint insurance representative was continued for the purpose of
requesting a firm cost proposal for each of the next three (3)
years from First Insurance. The original proposal by First
Insurance was 10% commission of the total City's insurance less
workers compensation.
The Director of Finance has met with First Insurance and for a copy
of his findings, refer to the attached memo enclosed on pages
through :3j__.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint a firm to act as
the City's insurance representative on all property casualty,
liability and workers compensation and further to include and
provide advise, training and other related direction in the area
of risk management.
(0
MEMO TO: CITY
HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE
DATE: JUNE 14, 1989
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF CITY
At the June 6, 1989 City Council meeting, the following information
was presented by way of an analysis of rates contained in the
various proposals:
Proposed Fees for Services
Consolidated First
Agencies Insurance
Hourly Fees:
Year 1 $16,500 Minimum (11 Not
$30,000 Maximum Proposed
Year 2 $18,500 Minimum (1)
$40,000 Maximum
Year 3 $18,500 Minimum 111
$50,000 Maximum
Commission: 10% on Coverages 10% on Coverage
except Workers except Worker
�31
Compensation and Compensation
2-3% on Workers
Compensation (2)
Alexander i
Alexander
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
Not Proposed
(1) Risk management services are not included in these rates, there
would be an additional maximum of $7,000 per year for risk
management consulting.
(2) Not in proposal - question raised in interview
(3) Amounted to $19,181 on the 1988 - 1989 premium
The City Council expressed concerns that the proposals were not
necessarily comparable and that a straight commission as proposed
by First Insurance allows for significant cost increases to the
City, if the total insurance premiums escalate. Staff was directed
to work with First Insurance to arrive at an agreement whereby
total commissions paid by the City in each of the three years would
be subject to a maximum. The agreement being presented to City
Council for consideration is as follows:
Insurance Year
Commission Rate
Minimum
Maximum
1989-1990
10%
1001
$20,863
1990-1991
10%
$20,863
$21,906
1991-1992
10%
$20,863
$23,001
(1) Estimated to
be $20,863
-Ac>
TOM HEDGES
JUNE 14, 1989
PAGE TWO
The first year maximum is based on an estimated renewal premium of
$208,630 and is a 8.8% increase over the 1988-1989 commission of
$19,181. The second and third year maximums are 5% over the
previous year. The first year minimum is the actual 10% commission
while the second and third year minimums are the estimated 1989-
1990 amount.
I believe this arrangement addresses the previously expressed
concerns and protects the City as desired.
As a related issue, there has been some concern expressed about
First Insurance being able to provide the level of risk management
assistance desired by the City. There is little question that
other firms can equal or exceed First Insurance in that area in a
stand alone situation. However, as a participant in the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, risk management services are
being provided and paid for by the trust. First Insurance is asked
to coordinate those services with the City and the providers which
they have done continuously. Given the number of municipal clients
represented by First Insurance, they appear to have the necessary
relationship with the trust to allow maximum utilization of all
available services. To my knowledge they have made no effort to
duplicate those services and there is no reason to do so.
On the Workers Compensation side over 700 cities participate in the
League program designed and administered by Employee Benefit
Administration Co. For general property/casualty approximately the
same number of cities participate and risk management services are
provided through North Star Risk Services, Inc. Since these
programs are designed and operated by Cities for their specific
benefit and utilization, it is unlikely that any private insurance
company is going to be able to effectively compete with the trust
in the areas of coverage and cost. For that reason I believe it
is in the best interest of the City to engage the insurance
representative that has the best fit with the current environment.
Please let me know if you would like to discuss this matter in more
detail or if you would like any additional information.
FinarM Director/City Clerk
EJV/jeh
I1
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
DESIGNATION OF TRAILWAY/LEXINGTON POINT PKWY & DANIEL DRIVE
B. Consider Modification for Trailvay Along Lexington Point
Parkway and Daniel Drive --At the May 15, 1989 City Council meeting
the alignment for a trailway in the area of Lexington Point Parkway
and Daniel Drive was given consideration. Residents on the west
side of Daniel Drive suggested the trail alignment would be better
located and impact fewer driveways if placed on the east side of
the street. It was referenced by City staff that the trailway is
an important link to the master trail plan and that when this
subdivision was platted, a condition was agreed to between the
developer and the City that a trailway would be installed by the
developer. After receiving public testimony and Council
discussion, the item was continued until the June 20 meeting, and
staff was directed to hold an informational meeting with the
neighborhood to further discuss the trail alignment. A
neighborhood meeting was held on Thursday, June 8, and for a copy
of the information that was presented by the City and a general
response by the neighbors, refer to the attached report enclosed
on pages through that was prepared by the Parks &
Recreation Department.
Direction was given to place this item on the Consent Agenda.
However, at the request of the residents who will be asking for
time to address the proposed trailway, it appears as an item of Old
Business.
There has been various drawings and previous information provided
in City Council packets on the Daniel Drive trail alignment, and
if any member of the Council would like a new copy of that
material, please contact this office at any time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To designate a trailway
alignment along Lexington Point Parkway and Daniel Drive.
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR,
,1FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS 8 RECREATION
STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 12, 1989
RE: PUBLIC REQUEST FOR DANIEL DRIVE TRAIL REALIGNMENT
BACKGROUND
The development agreement for LexingtonPointe Addition requires a trail or
sidewalk along the west side of Daniel Drive and on the north side of Lexington
Pointe Parkway. (See Figure #1) A request has been submitted by Lexington
Pointe residents to amend the development 'agreement realigning the trailway to
the east side of Daniel Drive. 'The petitioners cite that the realignment is
safer due to Tess road and driveway crossings.
The request was brought before the City Council at the May 16th meeting, whereby
the Council requested staff to schedule a neighborhood meeting to allow input
by all concerned residents. A neighborhood meeting was held on June S. Attached
is the attendance roster and the minutes of the meeting. In lieu of providing
an executive summary of the meeting, this report will' expand on the residents
concerns within the analysis portion of the memorandum.
ISSUE
The City Council' will need to evaluate and make recommendations determining
whether it is appropriate to amend the Lexington Pointe Development Agreement
in regard to the developers trailway obligations.
ANALYSIS
Prior to the. evaluation of a trail/sidewalk realignment the question is asked,
""should there be a pedestrian way along Daniel :Drive -and Lexington Point
Parkway?" The residents at the neighborhood meeting unanimously agreed that a
trail was not necessary. Daniel Drive lis classified as a neighborhood collector
street. The Comprehensive Parks System Plan, page E-22 of the Trail,s.chap,ter
states:
Wherever feasible require the construction of bikeways in conjunction with
all improvement of streets designated for trail development in the
following manner:
Major County Arterials - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on both
sides of roadways.
Minor County Arteri'als - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on both
sA des of the roadway.
13
DANIEL DRIVE
JUNE 12, 1989
PAGE TWO
Major City Collectors - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on one
side of the roadway and a sidewalk on the other side.
4. Minor City Collectors - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on one
side of the roadway.
Residential/Local Streets - No trail or sidewalk shall be required.
The roadway alignment of Lexington Pointe Parkway/Daniel Drive provides the
opportunity for pedestrian linkage to trailways along both County Road #30 and
#43. Linkage to the County Road trailways provides connections to Northview
Elementary School, Eagan High school, the adjacent commercial area and numerous
parklands. Also, spur trails from Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway connect
to the Highline Corridor and Trapp Farm Park. The Comprehensive Parks Systems
Plan, page E 11/25 of the trails chapter states:
To encourage trail use, trails must be planned to connect important trail
user destinations. Popular recreational and commuter destinations include
major residential neighborhoods, school sites, park sites, shopping areas,
centers of employment, and civic facilities. The linkage between
destinations should be the most direct route available.
Typical major trail destinations include:
o Schools
o Employment centers
o Shopping centers
o Public buildings (City Hall, Libraries, Police Department, Community
Clubs)
o Parks
o MTC park and ride transit facilities
Several residents at the neighborhood meeting stated that if a pedestrian way
was necessary, they would prefer an on -street trail divided by either a curb or
white line. Both Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway are 44' road section
thus allowing two way traffic with parking on both sides. An on -street trailway
would eliminate parking on one side of the street. The loss of a parking aisle
would result in minimal impact to the neighborhood. Tom Colbert, Director of
Public Works, has provided a memorandum attached to this report which further
outlines the concerns of a an on -street trailway. The Minnesota Department of
Transportation, Bikeway Design Manual assesses an on -street trailway, with one
sided parking, similar estimated ADT's and design to Daniel Drive/Lexington
Pointe Parkway as fair to poor suitability. As well, the Comprehensive Parks
Systems Plan, page F-25 of the trails chapter states:
Trail user protection is another important concern when determining the
route and type of trail. Potential conflicts with motorists suggest that
whenever possible the bicycle and pedestrian trails should be a separate
7 V
DANIEL DRIVE
JUNE 12, 1989
PAGE THREE
facility from the street surface. It is recognized that this is not always
a feasible proposal. In developed areas of the City where trail right-
of-way cannot be obtained for a separate off-street trail, on -street trails
will be used. To provide the utmost protection to the trail user, on -
street trails should have an exclusive or semi -exclusive traffic lane from
the street.
A resident at the neighborhood meeting requested staff to evaluate a trail
alignment alternative which places a north/south trail along the highline
easement from County Road #30 to Lexington Pointe Parkway and a north/south trail
on the east side of Daniel Drive from County Road #30 to Trapp Farm Park. The
trail alternative provides reasonable pedestrian transportation to north and
south oriented designations. East/West destination (i.e., Lexington Avenue,
Commercial area, Goat Hill/HUD parks) would be provided for by trailways along
County Road #30 and future Lexington Pointe Parkway trails within the westerly
undeveloped commercial area. This alternative requests no trails along Lexington
Pointe Bikeway within the residential sub -division, therefore requiring east/west
pedestrian circulation within the roadway.
The pending pedestrian transportation obligation requires a trail along the west
side of Daniel Drive and the north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway. This would
provide contiguous pedestrian linkage from County Road #30 to County Road #43.
The Daniel Drive boulevard width can support either an 8' bituminous trail or
a 5' wide concrete sidewalk leaving an adequate clear zone for snow storage and
safety. The boulevard along the north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway can only
support a 5' wide concrete sidewalk. An 8' bituminous trail would provide only
a 2' - 2.5' clear zone. The proposed pedestrian way along the west side of
Daniel Drive and north of Lexington Pointe Parkway would cross thirty-two (32)
lots of which twenty six (26) are within the front yards crossing driveways and
six (6) with side yard lots (See Figure #2). This alternative would incur five
(5) roadway closings.
The pedestrian transportation alternative to place a trail along the east side
of Daniel Drive and the south side of Lexington Pointe Parkway influences thirty
(30) lots of which thirteen (13) are front yards crossing driveways, twelve (12)
side yards and five (5) backyards. (See Figure #2) This alternative would incur
six (6) roadway crossings. The boulevard width would support either a 5'
sidewalk or 8' bituminous trail providing an adequate clear zone for snow storage
and safety. A topographic survey was taken by Tri -Land Development to determine
whether there are any encumbrances for trail placement along this alignment.
A Tri -Land survey determined that a trailway could be placed with only minor
layout considerations.
CONCLUSION
Staff review concludes that a pedestrian way is necessary along ,Daniel
Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway in order to provide linkage to important trail
user destinations. The omission of a pedestrian link would place pedestrians
within a neighborhood collector road resulting in an unsafe situation. An on -
IS
DANIEL DRIVE
JUNE 12, 1989
PAGE FOUR
street trail alternative compromises trail user safety considering the existing
boulevard does provide for off-street pedestrian transportation. The alternative
to utilize the Highline easement and a place a trail along the east side of
Daniel Drive result in reasonable north/south linkage, but compromises east/west
continuity by omitting a trailway along Lexington Pointe Parkway. Staff
concludes that a continuous pedestrian link from County Road #30 to County Road
#43 within the boulevards of Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway provides safe
and efficient pedestrian transportation. The alternative placing a pedestrian
corridor along the west and north sides of Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway
can only support a 5' sidewalk due to available boulevard. The alternative,
placing a pedestrian corridor within the boulevard along the east and south sides
of Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway can support either an 8' bituminous
trail or a 5' concrete sidewalk. The Comprehensive Park Systems Plan indicates
a bituminous trail is to be placed along minor collectors. This allows for both
2 -way walkers and bike traffic. The east/south alternative crosses less
driveways, although it will cross one additional road crossing than the
west/north alternative.
Therefore, this evaluation of alternatives leads staff to recommend that an 8'
bituminous path be installed on the east side of Daniel Drive and on the south
side of Lexington Pointe Parkway.
FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the following for City Council review and approval:
1. The development agreement for Lexington Pointe subdivision be
amended, having Tri -Land Development be responsible for the
installation of an 8' bituminous trail along the east side of Daniel
Drive and south of Lexington Pointe Parkway.
2. Tri -Land Development install this trailway prior to November 1, 1989.
U
Z 3anou
SL
7V "JO�'p"'
I ZNVMHJS , •
b
2.
31 9N X3
V.
31
fill
I. ,: :.'•✓� •'. t�•�1F p'l'y`, s � ,
� �\-..•'7...•+.'„ Nie . s,, /..,. • .
, .hd�i •Noy 1' �; � �'. � \ i
r � � ham.: . � � .� `�4,t4 � ���f �• s� �i . °s 1 �'�r, � �`1'� i �
ASI
of ''~•'� P� �, s� �_ c�l ea. •L • �.�a JwS %
.. �. .. -f _ � , ,�. � a� .: . •t Ali. yf �;
�I ., • , .1 . � ..� ,�; . , o.Ne • ` �.-.•e? .{� • Fes.
11.M=1M QI.-w.'
�..�.«• 2..J`J. _ _.__ 71.1/:
I
N.E. 1/4 SEC.26, T27, R23
I
y-rr
E7�ISSING!' i }
�4 ��lryrLl i�1 •► Z4, -q
io
—.'I^ LEXINGTON POINTE tot ADD
�+': I �,�'Li lam•- �;�`;••,'•i:+*•'\ .
:::'v • �l `' \ .e'er '!'i' :. : +1<:yAA
LEXINGTON POINTE 2W ADD.
P
L �'l
I
p;
_
SCHWANZ
$a-"
LAKE
1 PARK
/LIY
• • • • • �ia11W4(/L�XIN6T�tJ ACP
to Itta Its TR�dI r/A�(/�t X�"�i� fD11JT 2"d A>
r�n
FIGURE 1
MEMO TO: STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARR PLANNER
FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT#, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JUNE 13# 1989
SUBJECT: DANIEL DRIVE - TRAILWAY LOCATION
It is my understanding that, as a result of the neighborhood
meetings recently held, some residents have mentioned the
possibility of an alternative that would allow the location of the
8' bituminous trail to be within the travelled street surface.
There are several concerns associated with giving this proposed
alternative any further consideration:
Daniel Drive and its transition into Lexington Pointe
Parkway have been identified and classified as a
neighborhood collector and have subsequently been
designed and constructed in accordance with those design
standards. The design of this roadway did not anticipate
nor provide for the proper width necessary to accommodate
a 10' wide on -street bike trail. The additional 2' in
width over the standard 8' bituminous trail is necessary
to provide additional separation between on -street
bicyclists and the adjacent traffic on this neighborhood
collector street.
2. Due to the inherent higher traffic volumes associated
with neighborhood collector and higher classified
streets, it has long been the City's policy to provide
off-street pedestrian ways (bike path/sidewalk).
3. On -street parking must be prohibited wherever an on -
street trailway system exists. This on -street parking
prohibition would create constraints on adjacent property
owners during the implementation of the annual odd/even
parking restriction ordinance.
Due to the availability of adequate public right-of-way able to
accommodate an off-street trailway system/sidewalk, it is strongly
recommended that.it remain as an off-street system for the above -
referenced reasons.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
DANIEL DRIVE TRAIL MEETING
THURSDAY, JUNE 8, 1989
Steve Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner for Eagan Parks and Recreation
Department called the neighborhood meeting to order at 7:36 P.M., Thursday, June
8, 1989. Steve introduced himself and Cherryl Mesko, Department Secretary, who
was present to record minutes of the meeting. Neighbors attending the meeting
are as follows:
1. Dean Baumgartner and Michele Daufer, 4317 Lexington Pointe Parkway
2. Doug Ripperton, 920 Curry Trail
3. Kathy Kenney, 830 Curry Trail
4. Loren Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive
5. Judy Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive
6. Vernon James, 4262 Daniel Drive
7. Michael P. Murphy, 4286 Daniel Drive
8. Patrick Walsh, 4305 Lexington Pointe Parkway
9. Jan Stroshane, 4313 Lexington Pointe Parkway
10. Kay Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive
11. David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive
12. Jim Jensen and Pam Jensen, 863 Rogers Court
13. Mitch Espinosa and Laura Mikrut, 4328 Lexington Pointe Parkway
14. Bill and Amy Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway
15. Marty and Sue Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway
16. Julie Porterfield '
17. Gary Manney, 4321 Lexington Pointe Parkway
18. Tom Bydalek, 860 Rogers Court
19. Tom and Lori Esselman, 4290 Daniel Drive
20. Brian and Diane Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway
21. Kelly Thurber, 4266 Daniel Drive
22. Greg Cobb, 4323 Hamilton Drive
23. Jim Koloc, 4286 Braddock Trail
Steve explained that the City Council had asked the Department of Parks and
Recreation to facilitate a neighborhood meeting to discuss the issue of a trail
along Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway. The minutes of this meeting
will be given to the City Council along with staff's recommendation for the June
20, 1989 Council meeting.
The City looked at Daniel Drive with the Lexington Pointe First Addition. Daniel
Drive is a connector road thus the need for pedestrian transportation to tie into
trail links that exist. This issue went before the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and it was recommended that a trail/sidewalk be placed on the west
side of Daniel Drive and on the north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway. This
recommendation was brought before the City Council and was approved.
At the time the trail was being constructed, Steve Sullivan received a call from
Brad Swenson indicating that the residents did not want the trail to proceed.
There was a request from residents that the trail be placed on the east side
because it was safer due to less driveway/road crossing.
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989 - PAGE 2
Mr. Sullivan then stated that this meeting was for the neighbors and turned it
over to them for their comments and reactions.
Pat Walsh, 4305 Lexington Point Parkway asked what kind of trail the Council was
recommending. Mr. Sullivan responded that they had not made a recommendation
but that the trail planned was either a 6 foot concrete or 8 foot bituminous
trail. Mr. Sullivan also noted that the reason for this meeting was so that the
Council could hear what the neighbors had to say.
Doug Ripperton, 920 Curry Trail asked with what plat plan was the original trail
planned and what was the date of that plat. Mr. Sullivan responded that the
trail was planned with Lexington Pointe 1st Addition and the date of the recorded
plat appeared to be May 14, 1987 but he didn't have the substantiating date
information on hand. Steve noted that he would be happy to investigate that
issue if the neighbors needed further information.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway noted that he did have a copy of the
development plan. Mr. Sheehy suggested that consideration be given to placing
an 8 foot wide trail with a stripe on the street itself. This suggestion would
disrupt far less than installing a trail on either side. Mr. Sheehy further
stated that nowhere in Eagan is there a trail in front yards. His concern was
that if the trail goes in there will be costs assessed to the homeowners.
Steve Sullivan clarified that there would be minimal encumbrances within eigher
boulevard; fire hydrants, phone lines realignment, etc. and also there would be
no assessments to the homeowners for the installation of the trail. That would
be a cost responsibility of the developer. Steve also noted that staff is aware
of the in -street trail option but that Public Works is opposed to this option
because of cars parking on the street and the street was not designated for
pedestrian transportation. It was noted by a neighbor that "no parking" signs
could be posted to eliminate this concern.
Amy Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated she was opposed to the trail
as planned because it would be in their front yard. She is also opposed to the
trail being placed on either side of the street because a trail will draw kids
from other areas to their otherwise quiet area. She felt the money should be
put into other park facilities and that the trail not be place in front yards.
Steve Sullivan stated that staff is here to be unbiased and to report the
comments and concerns of the neighbors back to the Council. Amy Sheehy
reiterated that she was opposed to having the trail in their front yard and felt
that the residents on the opposite side of the street may be opposed to the trail
being placed on their side of the street.
Tom Esselman, 4290 Daniel Drive asked if this property was originally zoned
commercial. Steve responded that it was and that it was part of the Lexington
South PD. Tom Esselman then asked if when this property was rezoned residential
did anyone look at the change in the trail at that time. He also concurred with
the in -street option for a trail. Mr. Esselman asked if the purpose for the
trail was to draw children to a park. Steve responded that it was partially for
access to Trapp Farm Park but was also a link in the overall trail system.
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 3
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive stated that there was a bike trail currently
planned along the power line easement and that a trail linking to Schwanz Lake
there would be no need for a trail on Lexington Pointe Parkway. He felt the
connection could be along the power line easement. Steve Sullivan asked where
Mr. Ashton envisioned the trail corridor to Schwanz. David responded that it
could go along the east side of Daniel Drive and tie into Schwanz Lake but that
lines could still be painted on the street itself.
Jim Jensen, 863 Rodgers Court asked if there had been any consideration taken
for safety when the trail was planned on the east side of Daniel Drive and
wondered how something like this could happen. He stated that the residents on
the east side of Daniel Drive were told that the trail would go on the west side
when the property was platted. Why has it changed now. Steve Sullivan, noting
that this was a good question, stated that the trail was designated on the west
side of Daniel Drive when the rezoning occurred. It was felt there was a need
to provide for pedestrian transportation along Daniel Drive. The reasonfor the
possible change is due to the request from the Lexington Pointe residents.
A neighbor stated that the Eagan This Week reported this issue had already been
approved and that Pam McCrea had stated this was approved per the minutes. Steve
Sullivan clarified the issue by stating that the Council had stated they didn't'
feel comfortable making a decision with only one side of this issue being
represented and suggested that a meeting be scheduled with the residents on both
sides to see what the reaction was. Steve reiterated that nothing had been
authorized by the City Council changing this issue.
Doug Ripperton, 920 Curry Trail stated that he moved into his home in September
and had checked about the trail before he moved in. He stated that he will sell
his home and move if this trail is installed because he doesn't care if people
can't get to the parks and he doesn't want people riding through his yard. He
chose this location because of the privacy.
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive, expressed his frustration with Tri -Land in
failing to inform purchasers that this trail was planned. He noted that he had
seen two different maps showing trails. He felt the argument was between the
homeowners and the developer, not the City of Eagan. Mr. Ashton also stated that
a letter had gone out approximately a month ago to residents farther west telling
them of the proposed trail. He found it irresponsible on the part of Tri -Land
not to notify purchasers of the planned trail.
Kathy Kenne, 830 Curry Trail stated theirs was the first house built and the
proposed trail will go through their side yard. They would not have picked this
location to build a home had they known the trail would be installed at this
location. She asked if an in -street trail would be an option. Steve Sullivan
responded that this would need to be evaluated and all options will be
considered.
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 4
Greg Cobb, 4323 Hamilton. Drive stated that the proposed trail would also go
through his side yard. He had carefully considered the positioning of his home
to allow for a large side yard and with this trail he will lose a good portion
of it. Steve Sullivan commented that usually trails are installed before
development occurs sothis type of problem doesn't typically occur. During this
construction process, however, the trail wasn't installed during road
construction because of the concern for the trail being destroyed during
construction of the homes. The concern was raised regarding the destruction that
will occur to existing driveways now due to the installation of a trail. Mr.
Sullivan noted that the sequencing of this particular development is not typical
of most construction.
Diane Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that she will need to
install a fence because of the increased bike traffic this trail will cause as
we19 as the problem of existing tree roots affecting the trail in the long term.
She stated she was opposed to the trail all together and would prefer an in -
street trail.
Warren Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive is one of the homeowners whose front yard would
be affected and expressed his concern for pulling into traffic and possibly
hitting a child who may be on the bike trail. He is also concerned about the
aesthetics of the trail and is opposed to it being installed in this location.
Mike Murphy, 4286 Denmark Drive noted that he is an original' owner in the
neighborhood and is concerned about the neighborhood being divided over this
issue and from what he has heard feels that no one wants the trail at all. He
cited a political aspect of a similar issue in DuPage County, Illinois where a
road was proposed to be built in people's yards. The affected people banded
together and eventually ousted all the politicians in office and replaced them.
He stated that there is only a fraction of the neighborhood represented at the
meeting tonight and felt it was important to look at other alternatives to the
trai 1.
Tom Esselman,, 4290 Daniel Drive stated' that since the meeting was for the
neighborhood they should have the ability to make a decision. Considering all
the safety issues, he felt the decision should be an easy one. Steve Sullivan.
reminded the group that he was not there to make a decision, rather he will be
writing a report that will be given to the City Council for their review at the
June 20th Council.meeting.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lex-ington Pointe Parkway indicated that he would be at the June
20th meeting and asked if they could request this item to be placed on the agenda
early so that people will be able to attend in force. David Ashton commented
that since this falls under Old Business it is usually early in the agenda.
Julie Porterfield, 4210 Daniel Drive stated that this is the second home they
have lived in in this neighborhood and that they were not notified either time,
they purchased that this trail would be going in. She asked if June 20th would
provide for a final decision or would there be more time for rebuttal. Steve
�3
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 5
Sullivan responded that the intention is to have a decision made that night if
the issue is clear and there is a complete understanding of all the implications.
Marty Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that it appeared as though
the Council should be hearing these comments. He noted his preference would be
for a sidewalk rather than a bituminous trail and that the trail be run along
the power lines. Steve Sullivan responded that the power line area was a
proposed trail corridor. Marty Seidl commented that it appears at this point
that everyone is opposed to the trail completely.
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive stated that the Parks Department has been very
cooperative in this effort and would not dwell on whether or not they were biased
in any way. He continued that the Council seems to have the impression that
there is a difference between a sidewalk and bike trail and that a bike trail
will generate more traffic because it is a connector system. The question seemed
to be is a sidewalk safer than a bike trail.
Mike Murphy, 4286 Daniel Drive stated that the City wants to connect the bike
trails and agreed that this is a good idea but that it should be done before
buildings are constructed. He further stated that the power line corridor would
provide the connection necessary and that perhaps this trail should just be
written off as a mistake. He felt the situation had been handled improperly and
should just be dropped and that what needs to happen is to weigh the public good
versus the neighborhood concerns for safety. Which one will win?
Susan Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated that the main point is that
the neighborhood doesn't want a trail in their front yard. They do like the park
and trails but would prefer that there not be one in their neighborhood.
Jim Jensen, 863 Rogers Court noting he is one of the oldest residents in this
area considers this the ultimate stab in the back to have this trail moved in
that will generate a great deal of noise and distractions. He commented that
it is a shame that so many people have to be punished because of Tri -Land's
mistake.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway asked if Tri -Land will be at the
Council meeting on June 20th to respond to the concerns of the neighborhood.
Steve Sullivan noted that Tri -Land will concur with the Council's decision and
that the only obligation Tri -Land has at this time is a binding development
agreement that states a trail be placed on the west side of Daniel Drive and the
north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway.
Gary Manney, 4321 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated that Tri -Land doesn't want the
trail to be installed either. They don't want to absorb the expense of tearing
through driveways and repairing them when they're done. He stated that a class
action suit is an option if people wanted to pursue this issue. Gary further
commented that he did not want to see any more ill feelings over "the thi-ng" and
3�
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 6
suggested that a vote be called to see how the group, as a whole feels about the
trail. There were further comments regarding school traffic from Diffley to
Schwanz with the concern for high school kids being out on the trail in a
neighborhood of young children.
Marty Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that the in -street option
was suggested and as soon as soon as the stripe was mentioned the Mayor said
"no". He further stated that the collector affects the whole neighborhood and
that the neighborhood's reaction to this trail should be considered. Steve
Sullivan clarified that the term "collector" is determined by the volume of use,
thus Daniel Drive was identified as a collector based on the number of trips that
this street would handle based on the proposed development.
David Ashton asked if eliminating the trail would be setting a precedent.
Another question by a neighbor was, is there a trail anywhere in the City of
Eagan placed in the front yards of homes?" David Ashton responded that there
is one on Blackhawk and perhaps the Council should take a look at this particular
case.
Jim Koloc, 4286 Braddock Trail stated that he had come tonight prepared to battle
but after listening to all the questions and comments concurred with Mr. Manney's
suggestion that the group vote on what they want.
Kelly Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive stated she had attended the previous meetings
and noted that the Council is big on the overall trail system and did not want
to deviate from the original trail plan. Her preference is to have the trail
across the street where it would be set on back yards rather than front yards.
Mitch Espinosa, 4328 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that it appears that the
trail is there for a shortcut. Perhaps by eliminating the trail bikers will need
to ride a longer distance, thus getting more exercise. He stated he did not want
the trail at all.
Greg Cobb, 4323 Hamilton Drive commented that the Council should represent the
people and the good of the people and if they don't see a need for a trail such
as this, then the Council should be listening to what the people want.
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive asked if the Council will read these minutes.
Steve Sullivan responded that they would be given a copy of them along with
staff's recommendation. Mr. Ashton then commented that if the City is providing
this trail for greater Eagan then perhaps it is necessary. Because it will not
help those people west of Lexington and north of Diffley, it appears that this
trail link will only serve this immediate neighborhood. Since this does not
affect greater Eagan, perhaps the trail should not be installed.
Venon James, 4262 Daniel Drive stated that if the Council decided that no matter
what, this trail is going to be installed he would prefer it be placed -on the
east side of Daniel Drive. His first preference, however, is not to have a trail
at all.
112
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 7
Gary Manney; 4321 Lexington Pointe Parkway reiterated that he didn't want to see
this neighborhood separated because of this issue. The neighborhood will be
stuck with the trail if it does go in and he feels that it is the Council's job
as elected officials to represent the people. He further stated that he does
not see this trail being installed for the betterment of Eagan in general. Most
people will not be using this trail; only residents in the area.
Brian Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented on the safety issue
involved. He felt the Council should give a good deal of consideration to this
issue alone.
Jim Koloc, 4286 Braddock Trail noted that the City is big on their master plan,
however they need to consider what residents say. He stated he had moved here
from a Bloomington neighborhood that was divided over a similar issue.
Marty Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway noted for the record that this issue
has neighbors siding against each other. He knows there are meetings going on
on each side of the street separating neighbors and causing problems.
Mitch Espinosa, 4328 Lexington Pointe Parkway asked if any council member had
a trail going through their front yard.
Brian Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated that this shouldn't be an issue
of neighbor against neighbor, rather neighborhood against Council to abolish this
trail.
Amy Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that she did not want to be
divided from her neighbors since she planned on living in this area for a long
time. Her concern was also that a trail would devalue her property that she
carefully selected.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway asked if there were regulations for
fences being installed in front yards. Steve Sullivan responded that there are
specific ordinances for fences on private property and will investigate what they
are. David Ashton commented that he knew that fences are not allowed in front
yards.
Loren Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive commented that this issue had been beaten to death
and asked that the minutes reflect unanimous support for the trail to be
eliminated and suggested that everyone show up on June 20th to show their
support.
Mike Murphy, 4286 Daniel Drive reiterated that the Council should research the
DuPage County issue he had described earlier. He feels that this issue may bring
a great deal of support from residents throughout the City.
Jim Jensen, 863 Rogers Court asked if this decision needed to be made on June
20th. Steve Sullivan stated that it was felt this was adequate time for the
Council to review the results of the meeting and to weigh the issues that have
been presented.
oil
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 8
Steve Sullivan stated he had not planned on taking a vote, however if everyone
felt strongly about it, they would handle it in that fashion.
The first question asked was, "Who does not want a trail". The response was
unanimous by all people attending the meeting.
The second action was to outline some of the options the residents would like
to have considered if it is determined that a trail still be installed.
1. A trail be installed on the east side of Daniel Drive to Trapp Farm
Park. Eliminate the trail on Lexington Point Parkway and continue
the trail along the power line easement.
2. Install an in -street trail 8 feet from the curb marked by either a
white line or a curb along all of Daniel Drive.
David Ashton suggested that everyone show up on June 20th to support the in -
street trail if the Council continues to insist on a trail in this location.
Doug Ripperton asked if he could have a copy of the people who had attended
tonight's meeting. Steve said a copy would be available to anyone after the
meeting.
Brian Clark suggested sending letters to all Council Members in addition to
showing up on June 20th. Diane Clark asked if the resident's would be able to
find out what was going into the staff's recommendation. Steve Sullivan
responded that this information, along with the minutes would be available to
residents after Thursday, June 15th.
The meeting ended at approximately 9:15 P.M.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMIT/NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY FOR STEEL FRAME BUILDING
C. special Permit for Northern Natural Gas Company to Construct
a steel Frame Building Over an Existing Meter and Regulatory
Facility --Mr. Dennis Werkmeister, representing Northern Natural Gas
Company, is requesting a continuance until the July 18 City Council
meeting for further consideration by the City Council on the
special permit to allow the construction of a building over the
existing meter and regulatory facility. Mr. Werkmeister has
requested the additional time to pursue the City's request for a
brick or stone fascia with the architectural/engineering division.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize a continuance
of the special permit for Northern Natural Gas to construct a steel
frame building over the existing meter and regulatory facility
until the July 18 meeting.
SPECIAL NOTE: Mr. Al Herman and those residents who have appeared
at previous meetings have been contacted by the Department of
Community Development advising them of the request for a
continuance.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
NAEGELE'OUTDOOR.ADVERTISING SIGN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
D. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to
Allow a 40 Foot Tall V -Shaped Billboard Advertising sign --This item
was continued from the March 7, 1989 City Council meeting to
request a special study by the Director of Community Development
on high regulations for outdoor advertising signs in other
communities. Several communities were reviewed and for a copy of
that study and, results, refer to staff memo enclosed on pages
through
Also enclosed on pages 0 through is a copy of the
original staff report that was prepared f r the Advisory Planning
Commission meetings that were held December 22,, 1988 and January
24, 1989 -
It is appropriate to address the conditional use permit unless
there is an ordinance change proposed as a result of the findings
prepared by Community Development.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1)
direction regarding an ordinance amendment to the outdoor
advertisement regulations or 2) to approve or deny the conditional
use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to allow a billboard
advertising sign in an,Ll district.
* This study and memo were not available for Friday's packet_ They
will be enclosed in the Monday Additional Information packet.
W061
MW
i%j-kEGELE
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
of the Twin Cities
February 17, 1989
Mr. Vic Ellison
Mayor
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Mayor Eillison and Members of the City Council:
We respectfully request a continuance of Naegele Outdoor Advertising's
-application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a billboard advertising
sign on Light Industiral District Lot 2, Block 1 of the S & WA ndustrial
Acres addition, along Highway 13 in the SW 1/4 of Section 19, from the
City Council meeting agenda of February 21, 1989 to the next Council hearing
scheduled for March 7, 1989.
The purpose of this continuance is an effort on the part of the land owner
of the above noted parcel, to resolve the outstanding financial obligations
and assessments due the City as noted in the Planning Staff's report of
December 15, 1988.
We have been advised by the land owner that he will be meeting with Mr.
Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance, regarding the assessments due and
hopes to resolve this matter at that time.
Please direct your staff to contact me should this request for a change
in venue prove problematic.
Sincere, ,
Arthur R. Dean
Real Estate Services
ARD/bkw
CC: Mr. Jim Sturm
City Planner
Karen Finnegan
Clerk
1700 West 78th Street • Minneapolis, MN 55423 •612/869-1900
7apnet: 612-869-3897
\3
o r
iOBJECTt ..OMITIOiAL =3 MMMIT ..:..
�.4 APPLICAl1'i'& 1l�OQ.i A!lDO� TISI/G, WC
VJ
I. LOCATION& ZtUVTRIAI'. ACRFS
CI8T�1G'EONZiGt
mLI• ` �ilRIlli,i
M..: .. .
Y .24. -909
DATE OF PUBLIC ZZARING& BMRER 22 1988 - ,T11�OAR
DATE OF REPORT& DBC3KBER 151 1986 (REVISED
REPORTED SYS KAWMW Alm WGXNZZ NG DiPARTHMS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An' application has been submitted requesting .a Conditional 'Use
permit to allow a 40' -tall;, `V' -shaped billboard advertising sign
on lot 2, block 1, s i W Industrial Acres. This lot is located
between Highway 13 and the frontage road that serves E -Z Mini
Storage to the north.
Currently, lot 2 is vacant. If and When that lot develops, that
business would not be allowed a business sign if the billboard is
approved. Co-3—edescribee a 'business sign' as any align upon
which there is any name, designation, or advertising Which has as
its purpose business, professional or oouerciaT advertising and
which is related directly to the use of the premises upon which
the sign is located.
The signage area measures 10.5' z 36'', totaling 378 square feet.
If approved, this Conditional Us* Permit shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. There shall be a'one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot.
2.. The.closest portion of the sign to the property line shall be
10 feet.
3. No business sign shall be permitted' on lot 2 if this
advertising sign is app
4. This developmentions as identifiedallfuliill its past
outstanding
ding financial
obli
Cl
•
•
V
fINABCIAL OBLIGATIONS2 =In reaaarahisy the financial 1.{'istorical
records. for this parcel, 'it was determined that ibis property has
fulfilled its financial .Abligations selating to trunk area
sanitary sewer„ lateral benefit from trunk mater main, lateral
benefit from trunk sanitary .sewer sad trunk #rsa storm serer (but
onlya portion of the property). -Ht bas men iliscovered that
this property has i'nadvertentl_'y assa omitted Emu fulfilling its
financial obligations relating:to_,Lba following items's
ITEM PAO.i MATE MY
Trunk Area Water 232 $1.,115/ac 6.65 ac $ 8,008
Yater Availability
Charge (WAC) 232 2,015/ac 6.65 ac 13,803
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer (Rema-ining
Area) 186 0.083/of 68,271 of
0.57 ac) 5,666
TOTAL OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL OBLIGATION •$28,477
If it is required that this outstanding financial obligation is
made as a con_dit,ion of approval for the petitioned Conditional
Use Permit, the final financial obligation ahould'be calculated
in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final
approval.
9;)---,.,/
. s
,
_ . �{.1• �:. Z,..�"... P a ywT'"�1^ ... Tom.. ..._ i)�!e....
PIIBLIC STREETSnrmwVI�18CW. .YGRTI01�tj�r`t W ..411
it onal Use Permit "app os-4*"IvEs ,portai'aing
.
' to a specific parcelT �T, .
history peit�(:Fde sv m . amending
assessment histo is r'Torero. �„
assessments of record. In •OCOlaiiies +!I �resemFE ty jlolicie■
�
lie' tility
relating to the ti ►g "..lot {r « " `
panc3s
-
1. " the -�ei3oving Tiaa�►e`�i'Y"�Ip �tisa
w" for Council consideraR:.:;
ITEM
Mater Trunk -"Ilsymc - g.j9 jPa 496008
.
.41
Water Availability
Charge `�"`'�l,013%c 4.165 at 38,803
Storm Sewer Trunk y 3jof -(8.271 of --, Se666
"
TOTAL PROPOSED FMNCM OBLIGATION SM477
t
L
� ' • 4 y� fl ' ..7..nr
M A •sem °�
W t NDUS SIAL i� ItES
3
UP *Ar PI.Ar ppj
/ d1 - ----- --
ol
r46 LOT "'3.i• ::V !I >� f
' /�ft
�
if v
rr6 fir'
• r 1 •� '••�. 000• 4,50
. �}
omi®r
•.. ! y ..,Z. • • Y
h- A4
14
!�+ Lor �' ,• i• E �. �..
It
t
i I,A .yam • r00A
Idolb
Ap It
. . .•'�,��M•1 // I • T + • _� 11\y M11r4. wY.Y rQ�N tt.
Y
OWL
Uti"LL
Cox
i
js
r, NAWN
AM
1 (
71 �
Vie; :• •• ,�}t y
M;t1y�•'�. 7;t iC j31 '•I •.l .i�,'r .�• �+ • 4000
IP'�r°
,gyp 1 4 `�I�I .. • �. .
1i � I t .{}v$Y�Y,.;':A, � vim{ �• T r 3,�r .. .t - • •:t �.�".
LO
JIT
a of
v,{i L �(P{ f ••
�'' •h :?i::•' ' r • •
M A o 0
STO(.'M SCwt� "T�uwti — ol�.tiif; % of b.S�S AULIS
w�
_ _ as .
or
�• •. ��.- �r
in
rV
AP wit
�2.' • Iaq j y,.•.
i xg
� •. LPFFI F..'ll�
JL.; 0.
• • r � i% w
.,a,...-
iP -Ad:
7- suBJEClr4pA Y
y `
city of eapari STORM SEWER ':' avwoM.a::ana.►a
PUBLIC
WORKS
MASTERDE PAR
INV"IN..,.Ld
.�•.-. .'i' -' -iii I
-+..
_ _ _ _. _... _._. - tom.'•._ � - ., _ � _
06 WAW
-MYrs- �\ .yam nF :� .�''� L�'�'•' "�
I j .y s 1 . „ ...:. ..
r , • r -i r , - •,J
/ �� riil•�• MSD % v�.: �i.
16•i �:,' [r::- i fir. rrrhT r
•�� 970,
Ile
1.2 ,•� %. sal �' ..
' `- r • I'
129
'SUBJECT,, ;PARCEL
IG03
city of eagand pias: s°
_ WATER aowovr
ct �.: :
e PUBLIC-
WORKS MASTER TLAN
DEPARTbE
di
q
1
C
�..1p
RE, -SNC
MINI 1:= .
�.:. w..
._
STORAGE r - - 77-77W�_F _
U
edcisory Planning Ocmdesion
=ty of Eagan
3830 Piot Knob Road -
Sagan, M 55122
Dear ^omniss:icn Members:
Ttis x111 acknowledge receipt of your notice of a second
Putlic Hearing on Thursday, December n, 1918relative to the
application of Naeeele Outdoor Advertising to erect a billboard
#139
Again,
2, Plock 1 in the 5 and 11 Industrial acres along Highway
#139
Again, this notice comes as somewhat of a surprise and certainly
as a disappointment in light cf all the part signs denials* let
more than a year ago or so we discussed the possM:lity of a small
TusineFs identification signs along new highway /13 an the back of
cis prcjeet now that the traffic has leen pertassaently diverted off
old highway M. and were,refamd. We were told at the tine to
conform with the ordinance whieb places a real hardship an our al•ility
to advertise our onsite tusinesse We accepted that decision and are
trvin,v to live with it. The thought that the duty would now entertain
an enormous tilltoard leads ns to gaevUce that deeisdon. I also
understand that like I494 and 1358 which thea VIIs trying to control
that it was their intention to control the Dsdar-� !13 area as
well.:..:.:;.,
In light of the aboie we oppoes'the likelihood that a bi2.Doard
sign would now be easslidered m the Vropaty nezt'docr `'tows. a.
Unfortunately, I shall be with q fad !er the tbrirtmr Holiday
in another otate, but Lt this letter smvgy4W strangest
atiection.
Yery truly yours,
Z.,L Kid Storage OMP87
-�•''= - arleg A O
_ ..N:F.
-, _.
I r '
l�
6009% QR
The following *ppoistments` r '
1. Developers Task koros-`#oott SOMOy And NO
2. Bpecisl' ss soeat p3asi a
mks
- -.rlkl
-- 'iblr! 11is�isC AI RVI aim
`—i s'
and times.
Item C under Old Business tementry pass - �sontler Companies)
and Items E i F ander Now Business (Ordinance &pendment - Subdivision
Platting Requirements and Ordiaaace Bmeadr*at-Vablic assign of
y Street and Utility Improvements) vete continued. to -the January 26,
1989, Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
Trygg moved, Markley seconded, the action to appcove the agenda
as amended. All voted in favor.
BIIB�TE6
December 22. ieae. Member Groves requested a change on page 6,
paragraph 1, the first sentence should read 011e stated that the total
volume of issues were too great to take any action at that time."
Voracek moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to approve the
December 22r 1988r Advisory Planning Commission mantes as amended.
All voted 1n favor.
At this point, Chairman Tawlenty explained the Advisory Planning
Commission procedures to the Commission and the,Vublic.:.,,,,_.
s
Chairman Pawlenty opened the'iirst public bearing regarding a
conditional use permit to allow a billboard advertising sign in a
Light Industrial district on Lot 2, Block 1, a a V UdustrIal Acres,
along Sighway 13 in the soathwast quarter of •ecttoa la.
City Planner Sturm summarised tbe'4idtdmt1om'Aec
Commission.
Arthur Dean, representative.for as -AinAioant Of
Informed the Council that ooaditional use permits for as board
advertising signs had been allowed in the pot. -'No farther stated
i
they had alerted the adjacent gcoperty owners and Maegale feels the
i. request is within the ordiaaaoe.
There was no public comment. "'` •
. _•is'.:: 4 FS. C�
Tage 3/ZM_ Ja &Wdftii�'j!!.7<atAna ION ,;��;�
Member Craves goestioai G UigqLht i Abe"icier #[gni: ar.
Stars stated shoat six foot. 15asber Suler t.am; p acs -
cegardiag the pat s! �.
-141sq►a1n. s
.grounds for the aania��lor the, or . ick.
-Outlined the alga regniresaota;��rr, � at�..7M_ F.
of a pylon sign acid ae lave=ttii� gi. s be -tilt
the sign exceeded the square, footoicw�at._-r-
. Member Voracek questiossd 3f _��tvore o Vlaoad �: r^aa . ;: -•
expressway if it was within tae vearetion of :tbe :Coascil.: are �+
stated yes. are Voracek questioned the number at billboards presently
In Eagan. Mr. Sturm shoved their locations. ar. 7erkley asked if
there were any freeway standards regarding biilboards.Aft. 41tusm
stated no.
Chairman Pawlenty stated be felt billboards were bad aesthetics
and that the size exceeded code. 1% felt the City sbosld restrict
billboard requirements even further. Somber Miller stated he felt the
code should be changed to allow applicants to know the rules.
Graves moved, Markley seconded, the notion to close the public
bearing and deny the application for a conditional usepreit to
allow a billboard advertising sign in a Light Industrial district on 1
Lot 2, Block 1, S i M Industrial Acres, along Highway 13 1n the
southwest quarter of Section 19, as submitted by aaegele Outdoor
Advertising, Inc. All voted in favor.
MWE CREM 100 722 ADDITION - 1aDSMAL UM COMM
( Chairman Pawlenty opened the asst..ppuublic bearing regarding the
application for a prelislAary plat aons3stiny of two lots and an
P outlot on 19.5 Limited Business Zoned acres within4the Town Centre
100 Planned Development located south of Mown Centra Drive and north
of O'Leary Lake in the northeast quarter of Section 15,
City Planner Dim Sturm summarised the application.'.
Charles Bartholdi (Federal load Campan) A&owed the location of
the proposed plat to the Commission. Se explained the two Abases of
the project and the quare footage, tile, and property toning. ee
stated the plat met City sequiruments. ie further stated there were
other representatives from federal land_Ompany available for
questions. -
Tom Bolger, 3528 Widgeon Lane, bad concerns regarding the
drainage to the lake and tbe.vlow of the buildings from his property.
F Assistant City Engineer mike toertsch explained the drainage for the
project.
Member Voraoek questioned the building elevation and asked if
: there were any vents on the roof. Sr. Stara stated there was no
•
N B N O R A N D D N
TO: Jim Sheldon
FROM: Joe Earley
DATE: February 13, 1989
RE: Municipal Authority to Regulate Billboards
Our File No.: 206-5316 (ODE)
Jim:
The City of Eagan is currently examining its authority to regulate
off-site advertising in general and billboards in particular.
Since this would involve the regulation of commercial speech, the
constitutional test that must be met is as follows:
1. The regulation must directly advance a significant government
interest; •
2. it must be a legitimate time, place and manner restriction;
3. The regulation should be content neutral; and
4. Ample open alternative channels of communication should remain.
I have found three cases in Minnesota that further explain these
constitutional requirements. The first is Arcadia Development Corp.
y. City of Bloomington, 125 N.W.2d 846 (1964). In this case, the
Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's finding that Bloomington's
denial of a permit was arbitrary and capricious. Their reasoning was
that the Council gave absolutely no reason for the denial. The
Supreme Court further went on to say I... The City can unquestionably
regulate, even stringently, the use, size and position of business
signs and advertising billboards but the regulations as applied must
still bear a reasonable relation to the purposes they are meant to
attain." Id. at 851.
The second case is N)'Poel` Outdoor AOV CO V Village or ninnc CVL&S,
162 N.W.2d 206 (1968). In this case, Minnetonka passed a zoning
ordinance prohibiting billboards in residential districts and
ordering the removal of all non -conforming billboards. The Court
examined two issues. The first, whether a municipality has the power
to prohibit by zoning ordinance the use of land in residential
districts for billboard advertising and secondly, if the City could •
require the removal of pre-existing billboards. The Court held that
the zoning ordinance was constitutional and stated "If the challenged
X63
A
restriction is reasonably related to promoting the general welfare of
the community or any other legitimate police power objective, the
fact that aesthetic considerations were a significant factor in
motivating its adoption cannot justify holding it unconstitutional."
". at 212.
Minnetonka was also allowed to demand the removal of pre-existing
billboards but this was due to the type of lease that Naegele
utilized. The Court seemed to say that depending on the terms of the
lease or agreement with the owner of the property on which the
billboard was located, the City may have to proceed by eminent domain
against existing billboards.
The third and most recent case isi�ty of Cottage Grove v. Ott, 395
N.W.2d 111, (Minn. App. 1986). Cottage Grove passed an ordinance
prohibiting placement of all off -premises advertising signs and
defined them as follows: "A free-standing sign which directs
attention to a business, commodity, service or entertainment not
exclusively related to the premises where such a sign is located or
to which it is affixed." This definition is very similar to Eagan's
ordinance definition of "advertising signs". (Section 4.20(c)(2)).
Cottage Grove did continue to allow on -premises signs. The Court of
Appeals ruled that the City may prohibit commercial speech expressed
on billboards based upon its interest in traffic safety and
aesthetics and that Cottage Grove's ordinance was a permissible
regulation of commercial speech and did not reach protected
non-commercial speech. Id. at 114, 115.
In discussing the constitutionality of the Cottage Grove ordinance,
the Appeals Court cited the controlling case regarding the regulation
of commercial speech expressed through or in the nature of billboards
as Metromedia. Inc. v. City of San Diego, 453 U.S. 490, 101 S. Ct.
2882 (1981). In Metromedia, the San Diego ordinance prohibited
off -premises signs containing commercial messages while allowing
on -premises signs. The Court found such regulation permissible and
stated "If the City has a sufficient basis for believing that
billboards are traffic hazards and are unattractive, then obviously
the most direct and perhaps the only effective approach to solving
the problems they create is to prohibit them." Metromedia at 508, 101
S. Ct. at 2893.
It should be noted that the Eagan City Code classifies advertising
signs as a conditional use. Courts have found that where erection of
a billboard requires obtaining a permit as a conditional use, the
grant or denial of the permit may not be based upon a subjective
evaluation that the sign would be aestheticly objectionable but must
instead be grounded upon compliance or non-compliance with objective
sta m9ards enumerated in the zoning ordinance. Mcouiiiin Mun. Cg1.R F
Section 24.382, (3rd Ed.).
JPE/djk
l�
Agenda Information Memo
.June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting.
SPECIAL USEPERMITEXTENSION/GENERAL PUMP
E. Special Use Permit Extension for General Pump, for their
Temporary Mobile Office --The Department of Community Development
has received a request from Gordon Baird, Director of Operations,
General Pump, for an extension on their special use permit. the
permit was granted by the City Council on August 16, 1988, allowing
General Pump to use a mobile office fora period of one (1) year..
The request is made to provide time to arrange for new facilities
due to office expansion caused by the addition of new jobs.
According to Shannon Willey, Zoning Administrator/Planner I., the
City was informed that the earliest date of occupancy in the new
facility is October 15, 1989. General Pump is respectively
requesting an extension to the permit through December 31, 1989,
to allow for any unforeseen delays.
According to staff, the City has not received any complaints
regarding this matter, and General Pump'has met, and continues to
meet, the conditions of their special use permit.
Enclosed for City Council review is a copy of the minutes
authorizing the special permit at the August 16, 1988meeting and
the original report that was prepared by sta-ff€or� Council
ongideration. This information is enclosed on pages C� through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special
use permit extension for General Pump allowing a four (4) month
extension for their temporary mobile office.
l0S
I2_F-if) °; 4Z
Page 27/CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 16, 1988
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion
preliminary plat entitled Suncrest Addition to
1988, City Council meeting, to allow staff and
review the stovepipe lots. All voted in favor.
EAGAN V. CARLSON
to continue the
the September 19,
the developer to
Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve authorization
of payment in the amount of $16,993.00 to finalize the Eagan v.
Carlson case. All voted in favor.
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GENERAL PUMP TO LOCATE A MOBILE OFFICE UNIT ✓
Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve a
one-year special permit for General Pump to locate a mobile office
unit at 3380 Highway 149, to be used as a temporary office until
August 15, 1989. All voted in favor.
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE SIGN PLAN
The developer outlined the new plans for the signs.
Councilmember Wachter stated he felt the trees had disappeared.
The developer stated only the poor trees were removed.
Mayor Ellison asked for a description of the materials used in
the signs. The developer stated they would be constructed of metal
and brick.
Councilmember McCrea asked Mr. Runkle how much extra signage
does the proposal ask for compared to what is allowed. Mr. Runkle
stated they were meeting the intent of the ordinance.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the Cliff
Lake Centre master sign plan. All voted in favor.
Councilmember McCrea stated she was bothered by the "variance"
language in the proposal. She felt it may be interpreted as a
precedent. -
PROPOSAL FOR MEDIAN CUT AND COUNTY ROAD 30/BLACKHAWK PLAZA PROJECT
City Administrator Tom Hedges stated that SEH opposed the
proposal.
_A representative of Blackhawk Plaza outlined the submitted
report and the letters. He stated they were stymied because
prospective developers would not buy without a median cut. He stated
there were few tenants in the mall because of the lack of the cut. He
sited June 5th minutes encouraging access from Highway 30.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: GENERAL PUMP
LOCATION: 3380: HIGHWAY 149
EXISTING ZONING: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
DATE•OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 8, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING;DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The 'applicant, General Pump, is requesting a special permit to
locate a mobile office unit at 3380 Highway 14.9 to be used as a
temporary office.
COMMENTS
Due to the expansion of their business, General Pump is planning
on remodeling and/or expanding their present offices and would
Pike to have a 12 'ft. x 50 ft. trailer put on their property to
be used as a temporary office for minimum of four months and a
maximum of eight months. The trailer will be located near the
northwest corner of the ex-isting building.
If approved, the special permit shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. Building plans must be submitted and meet all applicable
state building codes and a City building permit shall be
obtained.
2. The trailer must meet the setback and lot coverage
requirements and all other applicable code requirements.
3. Decora•ti've skirting must be installed around the base of the
trailer.
4. The permit shall be l'i'mited to two years.
07
L476�7Tvtj
ZoFJ10U
PARKING, LOT
GENERAL PUMP U.S.
3360 HWY 199
/ EG,ANMN
75121
O
OVER HEAD VIEW
V=50
❑ o fel°1 1 ❑
FRONT VIEW
„=2p'
GENERAL PUMP U.5.
I DETACHED OFFICE LOCATION
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTM_INIATURE GOLF COURSE FOR TEE TIME
F. Special Use Permit Amendment for Tri -Land Partnership of Eagan
for a Miniature Addition to their Tee Time in Eagan Driving Range-
-At the March 21, 1989 City Council meeting Tri -Land Partnership
of Eagan was granted a special use permit to allow a golf driving
range on an Outlot within the Lexington South PD. As a condition
of approval, licensing of this use is required and the City amended
the code to reflect this at the June 6 meeting.
According to City Planner Jim Sturm, the Department of Community
Development has received a request to amend the special use permit
to allow a miniature golf area. Since this use was not included
with the original application or with the licensing regulations,
City Council action is required.
The 10,000 square foot miniature golf area would be immediately
south of the rental building and west of the driving range area.
The parking lot could be expanded in the future if the need arises.
No site grading will occur as the prefabricated facility sits on
top of the previously graded and seeded area. As a condition of
this amendment, no parking should be permitted on Patrick Road.
For a copy of a letter requesting the amendment and specific site
location, refer to the attachments on pages through
ACTION TO HE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
amendment to the special use permit to allow a miniature golf area
in addition to the driving range.
`\ O
4A\
June 6
TRI -LAND COMPANIES
Mr. Jim Sturm
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: TEE TIME IN EAGAN
Dear Jim:
Towne Centre Professional Bldg.
Suite 202
1260 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan. MN 55121
612-452-7850
"Tee Time In Eagan" has been open officially for 1 1/2 weeks. We
have had tremendous response with a great deal of positive
feedback. Specifically, many of our patrons have been inquiring
as to whether or not we are planning to install a miniature golf
course. Evidently; most of our patrons live in the area and have
younger children and the comment has been made that they would
very much enjoy being able to bring the children with them to
play miniature golf while they use the driving range facilities.
Therefore, at this time, we would like to install a miniature
golf facility on the same property just west of the existing tee
line. I have enclosed a sketch of the area that would be the
miniature facility for your information. This facility would be
lighted and it would be an 18 hole miniature course. The minia-
ture course would be completely fenced for security purposes.
We would like to have this facility open for the 4th of July.
Would you please contact me if I need to have council approval
for these plans?
V ruly yours.
aron K. Swenson
SKS:alr
Enclosure
C
4
r
c
Ir
0
r 4
109
/.
/ [P.AN
S�
pDDIT10N
r
CP'F� 0
-4 r It
G i
0
a--ZA
70,
L{'%'I.N aTPri - n'ZGFE / !IE'L OND A%DI, +�07J
��C=~L4T OUT LOT A `
irk
m
0
0
4
Rovlpem_ ..:C:.`. PREIMNGRY GRADING; DRAINAGE. p NEv,WvcuWm
r 5��,� ERD'MN'CONtROI l Utllt T'PLAM tlli{Arp wAK9iol O IAGaM •n.[m [r�Yn Aww
r EADMN CENTER' 3RD ADDITION ^ ^"' �••� ��.� .
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
REVIEW DESIGN ALTERNATIVE/STERNS ADDN
G. Review Design Alternatives (Sterns Addition - Streets) --At the
June 6 Council meeting, the public hearing was held 'and the
installation of streets and utilities to service the Sterns
Add'it'ion under Project 561 was approved. However, during that
public hearing presentation, there were questions and concerns
regarding the design of the entrance roadway from, Dodd Road
pertaining to the scope and extent of center medians through the
first intersection/entrance to the school. Although the project
was approved at that public hearing, the Council requested that
various design alternatives be prepared addressing the advantages
and disadvantages of each for further discussion and consideration
at the June 20 Council meeting.
The School District as well as the two developers affected by this
design were contacted and informed to attend the June 20 meeting
to represent their po itions regarding these design alternatives.
Enclosed on pages through l'l is a report from the consulting
engineer presenting different design alternatives with comments
regarding each. These will be discussed in further detail at the
Council meeting in hopes of determining a final acceptable design
so that the preparation of detailed plans and specifications can
proceed in a timely manner.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a design
associated with the street construction for Contact 89-16 (Sterns
Addition).
�`3
sonestroo
Rosene
Anderiik &
Assoctates
Engineers $ Architects
June 13, 1989
city of Eagan
9830 pilot Knob Road
Eagan, HN ,35122
Attar Mr. Thomas Colbert
Res Sterns Addition
project No. 561
Our File No. 49468
Dear Tom,
aspen W. Ikxhe. PL
josto C AMWK, Pa-
@q$3M A. LUnIt$ le,
Vfto UNmar. P.I
root$E. NV^ P.l.
ftten 6. Wm m P.E.
M~ L. Wf4d, P.E.
lM A Daman: RB.
WU,O W P9,@e P,E
Ow"6 C ewpit P.B.
Mary A N%MW, PE.
pp K rW P.W.
Vkho T. Ihwnann P!
IEOen t PktMt, PE
Dao 0 Lose , Pr
??WWI W Pee1w, ►E
hwhw c. WF4% RE.
Jarha$ R MWar10. P.B.
Pyhrielh'P: AN -900 6 P1
V.jM A..Z tffW N.Ps,
Merz 1, left P.l.
Ream C NgWk. AAA.
nh"r Il Anes P1.
Npwro A Unlan PC
Da,ied 1. IdrHan, P.,.
M1ni A, U% PE.
PhWP.,j ca$wel,►d.
M.r, D: WILL P1.
meow$ t. Ahpena, AAA.
61y P. "Mom. P1.
CMnv$ A. IAewaA
119 M,Pawepa'
~ K mn.
!y$aA M: SWIM C.PA.
The center median constructed Lto the driveway entrance serving Pinewood Ele-
mentary LSChool and' the future development to the north has advantages and
disadvantages. Based an recent discussions with Arnie Erhart (City of Eagan
Street Superintendent), Bob Engstrom (Robert Engstrom Companies)„ Gloria Rea
(Director of Transportation Rosemount School District), Jerry Bertsch (Pine-
wood Elementary School Supervisor of Construction Rosemount School 'D'i'strict),
and Gary Rylander (BRA Traffic Engineer). We have listed the advantages and
disadvantages.
Advantages:
1.) A center median would allow left turn lanes to be constructed which pro-
vides for a safer intersection from a traffic standpoint. Discussion with
Gloria flea indicated that of 28 school bus accidents which occurred last year,
12 were non -preventable. The non -preventable accidents all included rear and
collisions into school buses which were stopped waiting to make a left turn.
Therefore, these accidents would.not'have occurred if left turn lanes e:ieted..
2.) A center median constructed to the intersection and beyond will reduce
head on collision@ because they separate the traffic.
5.) Center medians do provide additional green space and identification to a
neighborhood. This benefit can be translated to increase value for the area.
4.) It can be argured that center medians are safer for pedestrians because
they provide a break for the pedestrians crossing traffic.
Page 1.
28
2335 West Highway 36 • St..Paul, Minnesota 55113ty 612-636-4600
11 (`T►
Disadvantaaese
1..) The City of Sagan does not maintain the green area within center
medians,. Therefore the development must maintain the green area which may or
may not be desirable.
2.) Plantings in the median especially at intersections must be done
carefully not to restrict eight distance. In 'addition as tress become older
and Larger, especially pines, the base can encroach into the street.
3..) Center medians do not complicate anovploving provided the traffic lanes
are a minimum 18'vide vhicb is the standard snow plow width in Sagan.
However, at intersections they do require add'i'tional work because the snow
must be removed separately from the other work.
4°.) Center medians and left turn lanes at intersections are for the most part
constructed with traffic signals or 4 -way stops. Therefore,, .if traffic sig-
nals or 4-vay stops are not constructed, center medians may complicate or add
confusion to an intersection because the intersection becomes so large.
S.) Center medians are more costly and may be difficult in dealing with
future street reconstruction and assessments. In addition, the street right-
of-way must be greater, therefore removing additional land for development.
6.) It can be argued that center medians are -not safe for pedestrian traffic
because they require a greater distance for pedestrians crossing traffic.
In summary, it is anticipated traffic volumes at this intersection will never
require left turn lanes,'center medians, .or traffic signals. However, this
does not mean the turn lanes, and medians can't be constructed and function.
properly. If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Yours very truly.,
SONESTROO, ROSENE,
ANDEEnI& 6 ASSOCIATES, INC -
Mark A. Hanson 110
MAHsli
Page 2.0
28
Ili
6
--
I
1 \l
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
Y; .gt1f88
CODIFICATION OF 1989 CITY CODE AMENDMENTS
A. Codification of 1989 City Code Amendments --Each year the City
Clerk and City Attorney meet with Roger Jensen of Municipal
Ordinance Codifiers for the purpose of codifying all ordinances
that are adopted by the City Council since the last codification
occurred. Periodically, legislation is adopted that changes
certain language within the City code requiring codification. For
a list of those ordinances that were adopted since summer of 1988,
refer to the attached memo prepared by the Director of Finance on
page Arg -
Three (3) City code amendments were adopted at the June 6 City
Council meeting that included 1) licensing golf driving ranges, 2)
redefinition of street or highway, and 3) regulating the parking
of trucks:, trailers and commercial vehicles, and will be included
in the ordinance codification that is considered during the summer
of 1990.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
codification of the 1989 City code amendments..
MEMO TO: CITY
HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE
DATE: JUNE 13, 1989
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE CODIFICATION
Representatives of the City Clerk's office, the City Attorney',s
office and Municipal Ordinance Codifiers met recently to review
1988 and early 1989 ordinances adopted by the City, as well as
ordinances proposed to keep the City Code in compliance with state
law.
The City had previously adopted the following ordinances in this
time period:
Number Description
66
Development Standards (Bricks or Better)
67
Clarification of Certificate of Survey
68
Subdivision/Platting Requirements
69
Multiple Ownership for On -Sale Beer and Wine
70
Fencing Swimming Pools
71
Refuse/Recycling
72
Refuse/Recycling
73
Mayor and City Council Salaries
74
Model Homes
75
Electrical Inspections
76
Accessory Housing
77
Subdivision Application Process
78
Diffley Frontage Road Parking
79
Massage Parlor Licensing
Fina a Director/City Clerk
cc: Liz Witt;, Administrative Assistant
EJV,/ j;eh
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
REZONING/RINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION S PRELIMINARY PLAT
B. Rezoning for Kings Wood 4th Addition/Horne Development
Corporation of 3.05 Acres and a 1.73 R-3/PD to an R-1 District and
a Preliminary Plat Consisting of S Single Family Lots --A public
hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the May 23,
1989 meeting to consider a plan development amendment for 1.73 R-
3 acres within the Blackhawk Park plan development and 3.1 AG acres
to an R-1 district and a,preliminary plat entitled Kings Wood 4th
Addition consisting of eight (8) lots located on the 4.8 acres.
The APC is recommending approval of both, the rezoning and the
preliminary plat.
For additional information on both the rezoning and preliminary
plat, refer to the staff report, copies enclosed on pagesL
through
For a copry3 to{p the APC minutes on this item, refer to pages AX
through �_—'-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
rezoning of 3.05 agricultural acres and 1.73 R-3/PD
1 district,, and 21) a preliminary plat consisting
single family lots.
V ---Lo
or deny 1) the
acres to an R-
oc eight (8)
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING)
PRELIMINARY"PLAT (KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: JAMES HORNE
LOCATION,: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 21
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) i R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) WITHIN
THE BLACKHAWK PARR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 23� 1989
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 17,# 1989
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Applications have been submitted requesting
a Planned Development Amendment (Rezoning) of 1.73 R_-3 acres within
the Blackhawk Park Planned Development and 3.1 AG (Agricultural)
acres to an R-1, (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat
consisting of eight lots located on these 4.8 acres between Cutters
Ridge Additions and I -35E. This plan, as submitted, is in
conformance with the City's Land Use Plan that designates this area
D -II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units per acre).
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: This site was previously rough -
graded and the house pad elevations have been established in hopes
that the street utility improvements will occur concurrently with
the Kings Wood 2nd Addition project. Final plat for that
subdivision is anticipated in the near future. This eight lot
subdivision calls for a roadway extension (Kings Crest) directly
west of Cutters Lane. The site is surrounded by I -35E and R-1 land
except for the Townhouse area within the Blackhawk Park Planned
Development to the south. An Outlot containing 55,018 sq. ft. acts
as a buffer to that area. It will be developed as Single Family
lots when Rocky Lane is extended west from the Cutters Ridge
additions.
The lots vary in size from 13,621 sq. ft. to 20,443 sq.. ft. A 50'
building setback is required from I -35E on lots 3 and 4. This gives
those lots a rather small building pad location, however, they are
buildable. The overall gross density is .44 units per acre and the
net density is .36 units per acre.
PARK CONCERNS: This subdivision shall be subject to a cash parks
dedication fee.
�D--k
GRADING/DRAINAGE/.EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposed cuts up to 23' in
depth. The initial grading has been completed at the time of the
drafting of this report. No retaining walls are proposed as a part
of this plan. All proposed grading is confined within the
boundaries of the proposed development. All slope areas will have
to meet the City's 31 slope requirements.
Most site generated storm water runoff drains to the intersection
of Cutters Lane and Kings Wood Road where it will be picked up by
catch basins then conveyed by pipe northerly to Pond JP -5. Pond
JP -5 is a designated ponding area in the City of Eagan's
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as
a part of this application. The following erosion and sediment
control recommendation should be implemented by the developer
before final plat approval, if not sooner:
1. The site should be seeded and mulched before utility
construction starts.
2. The catch basin at the intersection with Cutters Ridge should
be protected from sediment deposition.
I. The streets of Cutters Ridge should be protected from mud
tracking. The use of rock access paths minimizes the effects
of the construction traffic.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity
is available near the intersection of Cutters Lane and Kings Wood
Road. The development is proposing to utilize this connection and
serve the entire site by gravity flow. An existing 6" water main
is also located near the same intersection and is readily available
for hookup and is adequate for serving the entire development.
Water pressure for this development will range approximately from
65-70 P.S,.I, at the proposed first floor elevations.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access to this
development is readily available from the existing street
intersection of Cutters Lane and Kings Wood Road.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be required
to provide appropriate street right-of-way and utility easements
for those public utilities constructed outside of public right-of-
way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS• The City is awaiting collection
for the
following improvements:
ROJ I DESCRIP.TIO
RATE OIIANTITY
AMOUNT
512 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 18.60/ff 170 ff
$3,165
512 Water Lateral
7.52/ff 170 ff
1,279
512 Storm Sewer Lateral
2586/a 2 Ac.
5,172
TOTAL
$9"616
Based upon the study of the
financial obligations collected in the
past and the uses proposed
for the property the following
charges
Are proposed. The charges
are computed using the City's,
existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's
utility system based on the
submitted plans.
ROJ # DESCRIPTION
RATE QUANTITY
AMOUNT
NONE
��3
RINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION CONDITIONS'
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1;, B2„ B3-, Cl, C2, C3, C5„ D1, and El.
\ a4
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
I. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding,, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and'
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of' -way
.and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
ad'j'acent roadways as required by the appropriate
jur-isdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2.. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financ,ia,l guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
\aS
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constru,eted within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Imarovements
1. If any public improvements are to be ins-talled under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action ,prior to final plat approval.
E. Peruits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by .the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard p.latting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory
Planning Commission
City
Council
Approved: August
25 1987
September
15,,, 1987,
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
Loe.,&Tfcp�%►
zRO f-.j,146JG
G to talc `F�,Y�O*j
111 MRI IPI V I
PPR.
1
i RB
PARKI •�
t` /
J _ IIJ
I I3
REVISED 12-1-88
w
lG4LL a:ull.,la,
wr �. .r. M w4� la. �.� yyfl �,•r� ��..
... •w..M r...�r n.. way.
0
0
TYPICAL LAT LAYOUT
1O W
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION I A
t;•_ �`••• a •-- —� a .�..r— NORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRELIMINARY VW
tir EAOAN M M SODA j
REC!_.VE8 r29
..�:;• a ,%
.. '>.._ 'G
_ F ....�
—
`
I
Cor
`:1, •`°;_
I
yf e ••w
\
I
w,
4
lG4LL a:ull.,la,
wr �. .r. M w4� la. �.� yyfl �,•r� ��..
... •w..M r...�r n.. way.
0
0
TYPICAL LAT LAYOUT
1O W
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION I A
t;•_ �`••• a •-- —� a .�..r— NORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRELIMINARY VW
tir EAOAN M M SODA j
REC!_.VE8 r29
4
13,o KINGS WOOD 4TH
• QE
.A
ar. nry me
�
.
• . n
2
cA
y, ury wn
��
I
ti
a N i aw. vw.rve
WO .
�_
rA
Y'
[ .'.wi.ae•."«e �:+ a
nn ul. wn r M
=/ `O
�,
•� nry wa
[r�r..n. •i
aA
I
NI
A�
n
s w•, An r.D
a..v
�o a
•lN3
-M142
920
I
/
-
_
r.i.
I
91_0
i
fl\Sr R[V.
i�
.1
M
..y a
\f V•T
•�
2M
__
_
_
_M
l90an
—
_
-07.9--
A.D=
1 ti
n.Di
sFNELIMIN4MTr
— •=•
••
—==""'-- _
—�
�•riei�•—•-�••-•-
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION
z
c
•[
-' Q -A(8.._-.—`
1 pet I1Tee
.^-•
,. • in'w�
HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
EAGAN . M004WTA
UTILITY FLAN
rro. rano .a..[
-- _�
3
.^A.r
D
�O
ro. w.n
z
w •nm
. r
I°
unr
p
nwml.
a
vin.�wwirl.Msrt
n
/NCS.
14
W� w
sm;
43
• tai,
y Lalr.ufr[D
\�
\9
•'. \ e....mn �
�r•9n llll.
' a
f]
we
]
B
1 ...
1
NGS
01
D
E 0
T
-
•
`
KING
00 POIN rE
1
eeo
a
..
1
870
am
!
E
KI 4GS.
Noob
ROA
ew
_
••
-
__;
-:--=_ _
�i�•�'--��'
^^rte-�-�H-
_'
—W �
�.. 3f•`~w"�"
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION
HORNE 11EVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ECGIH. MHHESOT•
a•a
yD
IMINWA""'D•" � ••
PFELIMINARY STREET PLAN
_...:
3
F
_
_ .M
-T.1•..
FeI••
Page 4/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 1989
Commissionmember Hoeft questioned the mechanics of the parcel
split and combinations. Mr. Sturm explained the process.
Trygg moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a waiver of plat in order to convey a portion of
Lot 5, Wilderness Retreat Addition, to Lot 20, Lakewood Hills
Addition located in the northeast quadrant of Cliff Road and Lakewood
Bills Road in the southeast quarter of Section 26, as requested by
Russell E. Grimmer, subject to the following conditions:
1. Both properties owned by the Ruds, Parcels 052-00 and 210-00,
shall be combined into one tax parcel and recorded with the County
within sixty (60) days of City Council action.
2. Parcel B shall be combined with Lot 20 of the Lakewood Hills
Addition and recorded with the County within sixty (60) days of City
Council_ action.
All voted in favor.
BORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - BINGSHOOD 4TH ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding a rezoning
of 3.05 Agricultural acres and 1.73 Townhouse Residential/Planned
Development acres to a Single Family district and a preliminary plat
consisting of eight single family lots located west of Cutter's Lane
in the northeast quarter of Section 21.
City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the applications and presented
the existing conditions and site plan to the Commission.
James Horne (developer) informed the Commission that the 50 -foot
setback requirement along the interstate would cause a hardship. Mr.
Sturm stated that a variance would be needed. Mr. Borne explained
that the slope is steep which would cause a problem. Mr. Sturm
advised that the matter could be handled at the Council level.
Commissionmember Trygg questioned the future roadway route. Mr.
Sturm outlined the route. Commissionmember Voracek asked if there was
no intent to bring the Kingswood Road to Rocky Lane. Mr. Sturm
responded he was correct.
Mr. Voracek asked if the clarification of the site grading was
completed. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch explained it had
been handled through the grading permit for the previous addition.
Mr. Borne clarified the history of the grading compromise.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a rezoning of 3.05 Agricultural acres and 1.73
Townhouse Residential/Planned Development acres to a Single Family
1 53
Page 5/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 1989
district, located west of Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of
Section 21, as requested by James Borne for the Kingswood 4th
Addition. All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of 8 single family lots located west of
Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of Section 21 as requested by
James Borne for the Kingswood 4th Addition, subject to the following
conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C51 D1 and E1.
2. A variance is required regarding the 50 -foot setback along
the interstate, said variance requirement to be determined by staff.
All voted in favor.
ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES - THE WOODLANDS THIRD ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regaraing a rezoning
of 2.54 Agricultural acres to a Single Family district ano a
preliminary plat consisting of 37 Single Family lots on 19.5 total
acres (16.96 acres currently zoned R-1) located at the northeast
corner of Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of
Section 14.
City Planner Jim Sturm presented an application summary ana the
site plan to the Commission. Be informeo the Commission that an
adjoining property owner wished to purchase a portion of the plat
which would require a parcel split before the item proceeoea through
to final plat.
Boward Kyllo (developer) commented that a possible solution to
the substandard lot would be to require a sixty -foot setback. Be
reported that the reason for the land sale to the adjoining owner was
to preserve the trees and also because the existing home was 15-20
feet from the property line.
Chairman Pawlenty had questions regarding the handling of the
parcel split and asked if the action was properly noticed. City
Attorney Mike Dougherty responded that the action had been properly
noticed. City Planner Jim Sturm stated a waiver could be recommended
to the Council and an additional condition could be added requiring
the recording of the lot split prior to the final plat.
Commissionmember Gorman had questions regarding the northwest
area. Mr. Borne stated it was a private preserve.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/WOODLANDS 3RD ADDITION
C. Rezoning, the Woodlands 3rd Addition/Robert Engstrom Companies
of 2.5,4 Agricultural to an R-1 District and a Preliminary Plat
Consisting of 37"Single Family Lots on 19.5 Acres --A public hearing
was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their May 23, 1989
meeting to consider an application for rezoning of 2.54 acres from
A to R-1 and a preliminary plat of 19,.54 acres called Woodlands 3rd
Addition. The APC is recommending approval.
For additional information, refer to the staff report, copies
//n
enclosed on pages f� through /Sz.
For a copy jof the APC action on this item, refer to pages Vii-
-1
through -U-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the
rezoning of 2.54 acres from A to R-1, and 2) a preliminary plat of
19.54 acres called the Woodlands 3rd Addition containing 37 lots.
1-2�'
CITY OF EAGAN.
SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
WOODLANDS THIRD ADDITION.
APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES
LOCATION: BE 1/4 OF SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC: HEARING: MAY 23, 1989
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 150 1989
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY •DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 2.54
acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a
Preliminary Plat of 19.54 acres, called the Woodlands 3rd Addition,
containing thirty-seven lots.
EBIBTING CONDITIONS
This site is located directly east of The Woodlands and Woodland
Trail, south of The Woodland"s,.west of South Hills 1st Addition,
and north of Wescott Road. This site has been rough graded and is
primarily flat with a low spot between Bayberry Lane and Linden
Lane. The proposed 3rd Addition is in conformance with the 1988
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
BITE PLAN
The Woodlands 3rd Addition (formerly outlot G, The Woodlands),
which abuts South Hills 1st Addition• and Wescott Road, also
includes the 2.54 acres to be rezoned to R-1. The total 19.54
acres will include thirty-seven lots. The lots range in size from
12,750 square feet to 55,250 square feet. The average lot size for
this project is 19,956 square feet, well above the 12,000 square
foot minimum lot size requirement. All but lot 22, block 1, meet
or exceed the 8'5'' minimum lot width requirement. A minor
relocation of the lot line between lots 22 and 23, block 1,, will
correct this situation.
Access to the three cul-de-sacs, Bayberry Lane, Linden Lane, and
Linden Court, is ,from the existing Woodland Trail. Linden Lane is
in excess of the 5001 maximum cul-de-sac length and shall require
approval for this length. It should be noted that only twenty=four
lots are served from Linden Lane and Court. Linden Court has been
designed in a unique, hammerhead style. Four lots have double
frontage along Linden Court and Wescott Road. Cul-de-sac islands,
will be planted with native vegetation similar to those existing
in The Woodlands Addition and Chatterton Ponds. . A homeowners
association is responsible 'for the care and maintenance of these
islands. The existing planted berm along Wescott would be extended
east to incorporate theadditional frontage gained with the 2.54 -
acre parcel. The existing curb cut located along Wescott which
services the 2.54 acre lot will be removed and a full curb will be
installed. Due to triple frontage on lot 37, block 1, inherent
setback restrictions should be noted.
71
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill areas
ranging from 5' to approximately 10' respectively. The rough
grading was completed with the initial Woodlands development
proposal. All proposed grading is confined within the boundaries
of the proposed development and all slope areas will have to meet
the City's 3:1 slope, requirements. An internal storm sewer system,
is proposed to handle the storm water runoff. The proposed storm
sewer pipe will connect to the existing pipe near the intersection
of Woodland Trail and the proposed Bayberry Lane. The storm water
is then conveyed by pipe in a southerly direction and drains into
Pond JP -19, south of Wescott Road. It will be a requirement of
this development to provide ,a storm sewer outlet for Pond JP -39.
Both Ponds JP -19 and JP -39 are designated ponding areas in the City
of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. A preliminary erosion
and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this
application.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity
is available near the intersections of proposed Bayberry Lane and
Linden Lane with Woodland Trail. The development is proposing to
utilize these existing sewer stubs and gravity drain the entire
proposed development. No additional sanitary sewer lines will be
required to serve any abutting property. 6" water stubs are also
existing at the _same locations and is readily available for hookup
and is adequate for serving the entire development. Water pressure
for the development will range, approximately from 70-75 P.S.I. at
the proposed first floor elevations.
Page Two
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access to this
development is readily available from the existing Woodland Trail
which has direct access to Wescott Road. It will be required by
this development to remove the existing concrete driveway and curb
entrance located at the southeast corner of the proposed
development lying on the north side of Wescott Road. It will be
replaced with the same concrete curb section as existing on Wescott
Road. Bayberry Lane and existing Briarwood Lane are required to
have the same intersection point with Woodland Trail.
The development is required to make modifications to the turn
around at the south end of Linden Lane so maintenance and public
safety vehicles can adequately maneuver the turn.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS• The development will be required
to provide appropriate street right-of-way and utility easements
for those public utilities constructed outside of public right-of-
way. The development Vill be required to provide the appropriate
ponding easements for JP -39 and JP -12.
All regulatory agency
permits shall be acquired
within the
appropriate time frame
as required by the affected agency.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS•
The City is awaiting collection
for the
following improvements:
RP OJ !
RATE QUANTITY
AMOUNT
494 Lateral Benefit
Sanitary
Sewer Trunk
30.12/ff 132 ff
$ 3,976
494 Water Trunk
1,250/a 1.88 a
2,350
494 Lateral Benefit
Water
Trunk
6.24/ff 132 ff
824
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .053/sf 33,000 sf
1,360
494 Wescott Road
30.99/ff . 132 ff
4,091
TOTAL
$14,349
Based upon the study of
the financial obligations collected
in the
past and the uses proposed for the property, the following
charges
are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's
existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to
the City's
utility system based on
the submitted plans.
ROJ # DESCRIPTIO
RATE QUANTITY
AMOUNT
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 48488 sf
$ 2,710
494 Wescott Road
14.50/ff 384.'22.ff
5,571
TOTAL
$ 8,289
As a condition of plat
approval the objection to the
assessment
should be withdrawn and
the assessments agreed to, i.e.
see the
pending amounts referenced.
CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adoptedby
Council action on 'September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B9, Cl,. C2, C3, C5, D1, and E1.
2. Lot 22, block 1 shall be designed to meet the 85' minimum
width at the setback.
3. A landscape plan shall 'be submitted for the center cul-de-sac
islands.
4. The cul-de-sac length shall be approved as per plat.
5:. The development is required to provide the appropriately
sized storm sewer outlet to Pond TP -39,.
6. The development is required to remove the existing concrete
drive and replace the curb cut previously provided to
Parcel 020-78.
7. Modifications to the proposed turn around area at the
southerly end of Linden Lane are required to address
concerns relating to City maintenance, public safety
vehicles,, and utility service.
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additiona-1 assessment
obligations as defined in the staff `'s report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions, and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
-outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
S. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
G oe rrl o,^d
Z.of,j 1 f4 G
NEkd/
1L-OTTd
n r[sd IN
-L1 CM CqL— rt�
�L
I'
CARRIILLr
+
NW NILS LO[!
'iioen -. _: NE
NW
Si sii i___.
LOURS!
J
�al,
_..
• 4�Cw
/fJ sI
f "14
f7n!/I SW
5 �
�fY
H LA �t is
C.
NEkd/
N
' OOIC'..'
EOYII SE .
-L1 CM CqL— rt�
�L
I'
GOLF
UIINII❑
511, 19
d
N
.MI
rk Yl,
LIA
J
JdSC- TH[
NCI
/S'S�C �'II�• .
,y r' ROR[RT
[HGSTR[
COMM
.O AT M.. 7 ,
JAMES A. HILL, INC.
SHEET 5 OF 3 SHEETS /
THE WOODLANDS
-.1M9 SPIbS
�1 _OW
N.
E X C E...P�T
o
a
�
r
o II
1 O U T L O T
G
o
u
I
;
11
i
FTRAtL
\
�jl
I !!t M
ss+
T
.MI
rk Yl,
LIA
J
JdSC- TH[
NCI
/S'S�C �'II�• .
,y r' ROR[RT
[HGSTR[
COMM
.O AT M.. 7 ,
JAMES A. HILL, INC.
SHEET 5 OF 3 SHEETS /
_ I=
i wwn
w jj j \
[fif0f / I TILL
t
vw ®rs
[ f t
winoom
ill R i �'i
u
ah
SL a
� 7l w LM
rr
tr �
Y _
ash
YY
{K
Y l[
- a
r9
fi R
NO�J\ 1 yr ply
�-.nom. -
alu
8.0 DP 4ft I- J.
20 8858.3 62.8 WSCO fi� HILLS N I
WE9C0TT e
CARRIAGE /
• HILLS
GOLFII E -h ` I
JJDP�I�SE
3 doop
GARpEN L P310
N882.0 -- 854./F �� JP -16 oAwoDv
-17
gJi_I{ ^, P-33 879.1 858AI
*�..r`��*JP-59 / \�• �I8540 �Tl
87/.O
,� s� " -JY-4 89.7'N O-
�16Z 2
3"J 46 8 .0 �r /N J ��\ ..r? 1 7AT88
�c�N'�
E` 2.3 I C 8 L.S.-15 55 JO -41
-2: 4-
Ar
M.IFLTeSs.o
uJP-
if3�1.' JP -31
Ve : 876.3 _ 1, B8 3$,:-
aiIST-
880.4
J -
j RpAD/ h 1{�i 21 d
IIIITy 8822 �2 � 82.0
', �. ` 6
873.0
i
SQ;IARE Je92 0 _�� s• g7Z
i. 855.6 �1� I 885
u
JP -21 L'S"I7�-w
815.3
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG 0 1
city of eaga6 STORM SEWER approved: standard
soPUBLIC plate •:
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
P
0
C
x
M
m
z
m
0
0
0
D
r
f
MW m[1vMY, 4e N W2 OF"I Q M
�� l� NI � • f � ,�• IF \ ►1
s
xj
SUBJECT AREA
6F . r..'..
l4
neje
ORIGINAL PLAT
HLLS nRST
i;zom.w, I
MlTiz
-Mvt10113
RAT
=V,
7 5-.7
\,.'A1\' / 11
Iq
21
�'; � � I Ij I � 1 ee'\ � II'I'11 i.,�/�/./l / � `\•,
`l` \ \11 1t 1 1 1 1 afe '�'' ' t ' ! t111g1 I\' i _—� . ` I 1 •^ �►' if '
IF \. ! %
37
36
is
\ x
t
! lT2
13 tow.
TM
DrVELCIM
®\01
Page 5/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 1989
district, located west of Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of
Section 21, as requested by James Borne for the Kingswood 4th
Addition. All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of 8 single family lots located west of
Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of Section 21 as requested by
James Borne for the Kingswood 4th Addition, subject to the following
conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl and E1.
2. A variance is required regarding the 50 -foot setback along
the interstate, said variance requirement to be determined by staff.
All voted in favor.
ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES - THE WOODLANDS THIRD ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding a rezoning
of 2.54 Agricultural acres to a Single Family district and a
preliminary plat consisting of 37 Single Family lots on 19.5 total
acres (16.96 acres currently zoned R-1) located at the northeast
corner of Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of
Section 14.
City Planner Jim Sturm presented an application summary anc the
site plan to the Commission. Be informed the Commission that an
adjoining property owner wished to purchase a portion of the plat
which would require a parcel split before the item proceeded through
to final plat.
Howard Kyllo (developer) commented that a possible solution to
the substandard lot would be to require a sixty -foot setback. He
reported that the reason for the land sale to the adjoining owner was
to preserve the trees and also because the existing home was 15-20
feet from the property line.
Chairman Pawlenty had questions regarding the handling of the
parcel split and asked if the action was properly noticed. City
Attorney Mike Dougherty responded that the action had been properly
noticed. City Planner Jim Sturm stated a waiver could be recommended
to the Council and an additional condition could be added requiring
the recording of the lot split prior to the final plat.
Commissionmember Gorman had questions regarding the northwest
area. Mr. Horne stated it was a private preserve.
(Sz
Page 6/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 19'89
Member Voracek requested an explanation of proposed condition
number 7.. Mr. Sturm responded it would ,provide for a better turning
radius for the street maintenance. Mr. Voracek asked if the three
fronted lot would be affected. The developer replieo it was —a very
workable plan.
Voracek moved, Miller seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and to approve a rezoning of 2.54 Agricultural acres to a
Single Family district, located at the northeast corner of Wescott
Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of.Section 14, as
requested by Robert Engstrom Companies for The Woodlands 3rd
Addition. All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Gorman seconded, the mot -i -on to approve a
preliminary ,plat consisting of 3,7 single family lots on 19.5 total
acres (16.96 acres currently zoned R-1) located at the northeast
corner of Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of
Section 14,1 as requested by Robert Engstrom Companies for The
Woodlanbs 3,rd Addition, subject to the following conditions:
1.. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1.,
B2, B3, B41 C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, and El.
2. Lot 22, Block 1 shall be designed to meet the 85 -foot minimum
width at the setback or a 60 -foot setback shall be required.
3. A landscape plan shall be submitted for the center cul-de-sac
islands.
4. The cul-de-sac length shall be approved as per plat.
5. The development is required to provide the appropriately
sized storm sewer outlet to Pond J'P-39.
6. The development is required to remove the existing concrete
drive and replace the curb cut previously provided to Parcel 0:20-78.
7. Modifications to the proposed turn -around area at the
southerly end of Linden`Lane are.req,uired.to address concerns
relating to City maintenance, public safety vehicles and utility
service.
8. The easterly 20 feet to 30 feet of proposed Lots 31 and 32,
Block 1, may be transferred to the adjacent landowner to the east and
combined with that tax parcel, if such transfer is recorded prior to
the hearing by the Council -of final plat approval.
All voted in favor.
(0
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
D. City Code Amendment to Chapter 5 to Allow Off -Sale Liquor
Stores to be Open on January 1 and July 4 --Action was taken in this
previous legislative session to allow off -sale liquor stores to be
open on January 1 and July 4 in accordance with Chapter 4`9, 1989
laws. The _City has received requests from off -sale liquor
proprietors requesting consideration for an ordinance amendment to
allow this legislation to be effective within the City. Other
changes to Chapter 5 include definition of a minor as amended to
delete dates which are no longer applicable and subparagraph H of
subdivision 4, section 502 is amended to provide that revocation
or suspension is mandatory or in the imposition of a fine in
accordance with MSA 340A.415,. Section 5.51 is amended to add a
license fee for a temporary liquor license. If section 5.57 is not
adopted, the amendment to this section should also be stricken.
Please note that this provision provides for a daily license fee
and that section 5.57, as drafted, allows issuance for up to three
consecutive days. The City Clerk would like subdivision 6 and
subdivision 3b to be consistent regarding this matter.
Enclosed on pages / Ij through _LSJ is a draft ordinance that
makes the necessary revisions inclhding a mandatory revocation or
suspension, the daily license fee and to allow off -sale liquor
establishments to be open on July 4 and January 1.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
changes to Chapter 5 of the'City Code as proposed.
I5�
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE, CHAPTER 5 ENTITLED "BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSING AND
REGULATION" BY CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO DEFINITIONS,
COUNCIL ACTION ON LICENSES, LICENSE FEES4 AND HOURS AND DAYS OF
SALES; BY ADDING A PROVISION RELATING TO TEMPORARY LIQUOR
LICENSES'; AND, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODECHAPTER
1 AND SECTION 5.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER, THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City. Code Section 5..01 entitled
"Definitions" is.hereby amended by changing Item'19, to read:
19. "minor" means any natural person who has not
attained the age of 21 years.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.02 entitled "Applications
and Licenses Under This Chapter - Procedure and Administration"
is hereby amended by changing. Subparagraph H of .Subd 4, to read,:
Subd. 4. Action.
H. Penalty. The Council shall revoke or
suspend, for a period not to exceed sixty days, a license
granted under the provisions of this Chapter or impose a
civil fine not to exceed $2,-000.00., for each violation on a
finding that the licensee has committed a violation as
defined in Subparagraph F of this Subdivision. In the event
of a revocation of a license, the licensee must reapply for
a license and meet the requirements for a license under this
Chapter. In the event that a fine imposed pursuant to this
Subparagraph is not pa-i•d within fifteen days of its
imposition by the Council, the license shall be permanently
suspended until the fine is paid.
Section 3. Eagan City Code Sec. 5..51 entitled "Liquor
License Fees'" is hereby amended by adding a Subdivision, to read.:
read,:
Subd. 6. The daily temporary liquor license fee
is $150.00.
Section 4. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.53 is hereby amended, to
SEC. 5.53. HOURS AND DAYS OF' LIQUOR SALES. Except as
otherwise provided in Section 5.54, no on -sale shall be made
after 1:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor between 12:00 o'clock
midnight and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor between the
hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Tuesday
through Saturday. No off -sale shall be made on Sunday nor
before 8:00 o'clock A.M. or after 8:00 o'clock P.M. of any
day, except Friday and Saturday on which days off -sale may
be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. No off -sale shall be made
on Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day, December 25., but on
the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is
not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off -sales may be
made until 10:00 o!clock P.M. No sale of liquor shall be
made after B.r00 o'clock P.M. on December 24.
Sect -ion 5. Eagan City Code, Chapter 5, is hereby amended by
adding a Section, to read:
SEC. 5.57. TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE.
Subd. 1. License Authorized. Notwithstanding any
provision of the City Code to the contrary,, the Council may
issue a license for the temporary on -sale of liquor in
connection with a social event sponsored by the licensee.
Such license may provide that the licensee may contract with
the holder of a full -year on -sale license, issued by the
City, for liquor catering services.
Subd. 2. Applicant. The applicant for a license
under this Section must be a club or charitable, religious,
or other non-profit organization in existence for at least
three years.
Subd, 3. Terms and Conditions of License.
A. No license is valid until approved by the
Commissioner.
B. No license shall be issued for more than
three consecutive days.
C. All licenses and licensees are subject to
all provisions of statutes and the City Code relating to
liquor sale and licensing. The licensee shall provide proof
of financial responsibility coverage and, 'in the case of
catering by a full -year on -sale licensee, such caterer shall
provide proof of the extension of such coverage to the
licensed premises.
D. Licenses may authorize sales on premises
other than those owned or permanently occupied by the
licensee.
Subd. 4. Insurance Required. The Council may,
but at no time shall it be under any obligation whatsoever
to, grant a temporary liquor license on premises owned or
controlled by the City. Any such license may be
conditioned., qualified or restricted as the Council sees
-2-
fit. If the premises to be licensed are owned or under the
control of the City, the applicant shall file with the City,
prior to issuance of the license, a certificate of liability
insurance coverage in at least the sum of $100,0.00.0:0 for
injury to any .one person, $300,000..00 for injury to more
than one person, and $25,000.00 for property damage, naming
the City as ,an insured during the license period.
Section 6. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 5.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by
reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
CITY OF'EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By: By:
Its: Clerk Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
-3-
IS-7
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CONT. 89-15, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONT.
(ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER -UTILITIES)
E. Contract 89-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Armstrong
Business Center - Utilities) --At 10:30 a.m. on June 19, 1989,
formal bids will be received for the installation of utilities to
service the proposed Armstrong Business Center located within the
Eagandale Industrial Park near the intersection of Apollo, Mike
Collins Drive and Lone Oak Road. The tabulation of bids received
will be included in the Additional Information packet on Monday.
All bids will be checked for accuracy and compliance with the
specification documents and any deviations will be mentioned on
June 20th. If the public hearing required for this project is
closed and the project authorized, it would be appropriate to award
the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 89-15, (Armstrong Business Center -Utilities) and award the
contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
(S9
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 158 1989
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
RTB NOMINATION AND AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE
Enclosed on pages —&--( through " is a copy of an action memo
from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities requesting
nominations for the regional transit board and asking for city
officials to volunteer their time as a member of one of the AMM
committees.
In regard to the RTB nomination there are eight of the new eleven
member board that will be appointed by the Metropolitan Council.
Please note on the attached map that an appointment will be made
from this area. Since nominations are to be submitted on
Wednesday, June 21, it will be necessary to act at Tuesday's
meeting. If any member of the City Council knows of someone who
would be interested in seeking an appointment please notify this
office prior to Tuesday so that they can be contacted and added to
the administrative agenda if appropriate.
BRAUN ASSESSMENT APPEAL
The City has been notified that the Braun assessment appeal is
scheduled for court on August 25.
SENECA ORDER CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The last Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee meeting was held
on Wednesday, June 14 at the Eagan City Hall and the purpose of the
meeting was to receive a construction update from MWI/C-C� staff and
d'scuss various odor complaints. Enclosed on pages through
are copies of the May 10, 1989 minutes which also include
a copy of a statement of goals for the committee. The City
Administrator provided a letter at that meeting which provided an
accurate focus of the committee's responsibilities according to the
joint agreement.
SCHOOL DISTRICT 196/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
School District 196 has contacted the City and is seeking a land
acquisition for the next elementary school to be located south of
Cliff Road on either Pilot Knob Road or Cliff Road.
EAGAN 4TH OF JULY PARADE
Please notify this office no later than the City Council meeting
on Tuesday evening as to whether you plan to ride in the 4th of
July parade. According to Dr. Don Clark it will be necessary that
each of you interested in riding in the parade provide your own
vehicle and driver.
59
PUBLIC MEETING/DAKOTA COUNTY INCINERATOR
On June 6 our administrative intern attended a public meeting at
the Rosemount High School sponsored by the Met Council regarding
the proposed incinerator. For a summary of what transpired at that
meeting, refer to the attachment enclosed on page _P,�X.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE
The City Administrator, Assistants to the City Administrator Duffy
and Hohenstein attended various sessions of the League of Minnesota
Cities conference that was held in Minneapolis last week. There
were a number of various sessions ranging from economic development
to sexual and racial harassment to solid waste management and
several sessions on revenue sources. Governor Perpich spoke prior
to the LMC banquet on Thursday and essentially informed cities that
truth in taxation will not work and, therefore, will not be
implemented in 1989. Regarding the impact of the veto on property
tax and local government aid there is not direction given to the
cities however we were told that specific regulations would be
forthcoming late this summer.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS.MONTELY REPORT/MAY
Enclosed on pages 1-74 through III is a copy of the Protective
Inspections monthly report for May 1989. Please note that despite
the reduction in building permits, our permit fees are running
higher in 1989.
MISCELLANEOUS COUNTY AND STATE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
Dakota County and MnDOT both are proposing to perform various
maintenance overlays on their jurisdictional roadways within the
City of Eagan at the following locations:
STREET TERMINI
MnDOT
T.H. 55 Mendota Bridge to South Junction of
T.H. 149 (Starks Halfway House)
Dakota Countv
County Road 43 (Lex. Ave.) Yankee Doodle Rd. to Lone Oak Rd.
In addition to these major overlay projects, both agencies will be
performing miscellaneous spot patch and repairs throughout the
community during the next 1 - 6 weeks. If any additional
information is desired on any of these projects, please let the
Director of Public Works know.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
c �t= o Icition of
il politan
kipalifies
INTO]
k� I '. I& . ff-
El i
C o R 8 E c T 1 o N
Some of the attached Bulletins mailed Tuesday, June 6, were
missing the second page, which contained important
information on application for RTB nomination and !NM
committee assignment. We apologize for any confusion or
inconvenience this may have caused. Please respond as quickly
as possible so that the Board may act at its June 29, 1,989
meeting.
Thank you.
1°9 university a Dime earl, ^t, paUI, min�esota 55101 (612) 227 1006
(-V
June 6, 1989
TO: Member City Officials
FROM: Walt Fehst, President
RE: MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES ►ND
NOMINATIONS TO THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD
1. REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB) NOMINATIONS.
Recent legislation reorganizing the Regional Transit Board
provides that of the new eleven member board, eight shall be
appointed by the Metropolitan Council one each from the
various council districts per the enclosed map. Of these
eight, at least two must be elected county officials and four
must be elected city or town officials. Various
organizations representing counties and cities, including the
AMM are required to provide the Metropolitan Council with at
least two nominations for each position.
This is a significant change from past philosophy. Recent AMM
policy called for elected official direct participation on
the Regional Transit Board. Legislators, including the
principal authors, were concerned about the dedication and
commitment of time by elected officials and only after several
strong assurances by AMM staff did they in fact establish an
PTB with a majority of elected officials.
The new RTB in addition to its previous tasks and duties, has
regional planning and approval authority over LRT. Its
responsibilities will include coordination of all transit,
approval of LRT Grants, study and provision of increased
suburban transit opportunity and overseeing a new LRT planning
advisory group.
A position on this new board will be challenging and will
require a commitment on the part of those serving to be active
participants. RTB members receive $50 per meeting not to
exceed $50 per day and parking and travel expenses. The
current board meets twice a month late Monday afternoon with
subcommittee meetings following. However, meeting day, time
and frequency will be at the discretion of the new board. The
AMM board must make nominations to the Metropolitan Council
by the last week of June.
ACTION REQUESTED
If you as an elected official or another elected official from
your city or neighboring city wishes to serve on the RTB and
can make the necessary time commitment, please indicate your
interest to AM11 President Walt Fehst or AMM staff no later
than Wednesday, June 21, 1989. Your request for nomination
should be in the form of a letter to Walt Fehst in care of the
AMM office at 183 University Ave., East, St. Paul, Minnesota
55101 and accompanied by a resume of at least your
governmental experience. Some discussion of your interest or
previous involvement in transit and transportation issues would
be helpful.
2. MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES:
THE AMM NEEDS YOUR HELP. GET INVOLVED AND BE PART OF THE AMM
POLICY PROCESS AND REPRESENT YOUR CITY'S INTERESTS.
We, as city officials, cannot afford to be silent. Please
take a few minutes to read the brief description of the five
standing policy committees (enclosed) and volunteer a small
amount of your valuable time to make an impact by filling in
and returning the attached form. The committees will meet in
August and September approximately four times each year. The
Board of Directors will be making two year appointments in late
June and would like a clear indication of all persons who are
willing to give a small part of their time and energy to serve
on one or more of these committees. The Board would also
welcome any suggestions for specific issues or concerns to
be studied by the committees. If you have questions, please
contact either Roger Peterson or Vern Peterson in the AMM
Office (227-4008).
DISTRIBUTION NOTE:
Mayor, Councilmember, Managers, and Administrators will
receive this Bulletin individually. However, if other city
employees such as finance directors, housing officers,
planners, etc. would like to serve on an AMM Committee,
please submit their names.
COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS:
1. METROPOLITAN AGENCIES COMMITTEE
Considers legislative issues and non -legislative issues related
to the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Commissions. The
Committee monitors the structure and relationship between the
regional entities and local units of government and reviews
amendments to Metropolitan Development Guide Policy Chapters or
any new chapters developed. In past years, the Committee has
developed policy on land use planning, metropolitan
significance, solid waste management, Met Council selection
process, etc. It also reviewes the council's yearly budget.
2. MUNICIPAL REVENUES COMMITTEE
Considers any matter concerning revenues, taxes, and city
expenditures. Included are state aid formulas, state aid dollars,
levy limits, property tax assessments, and fiscal disparities. The
Committee will be looking very carefully at the effects of the
state aid formula and levy limit modifications as well as the new
net tax capacity rates and the balance of aids/credits between the
metro and outstate regions.
3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Concerns itself with all issues related to economic development
and housing including subsidized housing, affordable housing,
and activities of the Metropolitan HRA. Reviews all amendments
to the Metropolitan Council's Housing Guide Policy Chapter with
particular emphasis on low and moderate income housing concerns.
Will review legislation dealing with EDA's, HRAs, Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) and Development authorities.
4. GENERAL LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
Examine issues which have impact on metropolitan area cities
outside the scope of other AMM committees. In the past, this
Committee developed policy on municipal self insurance,
municipal consolidation, pensions, cable communications, PELRA
Amendments, Comparable Worth, etc.
5. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Studies all major issues related to transportation and transit
at the metropolitan, state and federal levels. The ten (10)
elected officials who represent the AMM on the Transportation
Advisory Board (TAB) and the eight (8) city staff officials
who represent the AMM on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
are encouraged to be members of this Committee along with other
city officials.
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNCIPALITES
(Please return by not later than June 215t.)
NAME CITY POISITON
CITY
PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS
street
city zip code)
PREFERRED TELEPHONE CONTACT NUMBER
PLEASE INDICATE COMMITTEE CHOICE
T. KN -5--2 N-5-7-
Municipal Revenues
Metropolitan Agencies
Housing and Economic Development
General Legislation
Transportation
SUGGESTED ISSUES TO BE STUDIED
PLEASE RETURN TO:
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
183 University Ave., East
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Att: Carol Williams
I(eS
REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD DISTRICTS
•r 1Y•M �\
•N.• 1: V 1•Y D•.Y, ..
• e•11«fN 11 1� •.`•.••
r ;:Y .n...\ •..r, Scar
•w w a County BoundaryILLZL.. n. 1 n•n •.�\
— KAUrIPP81 BounOSry `IICT a.. ••\.• n« «.�. ..
n
.YDD
—_TownShIP Boundary
.•nr.�.0 w Iw CTOw CO
13
'q�� x•.e•c rlrrl CO ,••w., .. .1• - •Y\i1/, • �• �
�i� f'Gi1J a •IP •Du'. .-I �,[ `.� jui ai� 1
.�il- niJJJJJJ' ti. �� _- �•�' - � . }Seat � n.\I 1, .: ` _-_ _
• • xx ."s[1....1. :D•..• � .see•..• t
'• ��—,• ... , •.{. 11 \ •1 •rte ..,•
L aw,• •�•Y , {• D•••1 Y
' nw•.,.•w12 i •\� u,u11 unl �
PM
- u[e... p•••� t0 1
C.•vl• CO
eOT•
.{.•r:11• n.i• n�evq .-.. t•' 1— —� �� a I wJ•upl 01p•••1 ♦. .. r,Hn,a• �-
--------j JIr
1 14 \I.1 •�\\I I SSSS -..D. . SSSS.
�1• i ... .., •1
SCOTT c0
...IT �1`r-__-SII \.. .�• _ .1• .Ir-.
f•IDJ
D ,\ SSSS.. _. •. ..
tlo e
le •
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES AREA
vo
- -- — ---
SENECA ODOR CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
May 10, 1989
MINUTES
1�348%1AZ*] ID1317
The fourth meeting of the Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee
was called to order at 5:00 p.m., May 10, 1989, at the Eagan City
Hall. Attendees were Al Arends, Betty Bassett, Michael Hazel,
Lester Spencer and John Westley, area residents; Kristy Marnin and
Dale Runkle, City of Eagan; Jim Sheldon, McMenomy & Severson (City
attorney); and Karla Eggink, Pauline Langsdorf, Bob Polta, Harold
Voth and Jim Wawra, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC).
II. REVIEW OF AGENDA/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as distributed.
MINUTES: Bassett requested the following addition be made to her
comments as contained in the third paragraph on page three:
Bassett stated that the neighbors see no reason to be grateful for
promises made to them and therefore they cannot be expected to be
grateful for things (promises) that have not taken place yet. Th
addition, part of the plan with the City in satisfying the
neighbors' concerns was that the neighbors would be kept informed
as each of these steps (as contained in the Development Agreement)
came along and would have the opportunity to provide input
regarding these steps. Bassett continued that her main point is
that the rumors regarding the neighbors complaining are unfair.
As far as being grateful, Bassett noted that she will be happy to
write a letter in 1992 praising the MWCC if everything goes as
agreed.
The minutes of the April 12, 1989 meeting were accepted with the
above noted corrections/clarifications.
III. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
1. Committee Duties/Organization
Marnin distributed a memo from Tom Hedges to Dale Runkle, dated
May 8, 1989, regarding the role of the committee and selection of
a committee chair.
A. Selection of Committee Chair
Marnin informed the committee that no representative of the
business community has contacted the City regarding participation
on the committee although contacts have been made. Westley -stated
that he is willing to give up ,his seat as the at -large resident
representative to serve as the business community representative
Seneca odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 2
as he also works in the area. Bassett said that she feels it is
important to have a business community representative, and that
Westley could serve this function, particularly since he is a
member of the Chamber of Commerce. Runkle informed Westley that
he should submit a letter to Tom Hedges requesting this change.
Marnin stated that the committee could select a chair if it so
desired given the fact that most of the people who will be
attending the meetings regularly are present. If not, she can
continue as the committee facilitator until such time as the
committee selects a chair.
Westley indicated that having Marnin continue to serve as
facilitator would be acceptable. Bassett agreed, but noted that
whomever serves as the committee chair should not be allowed to
sway the committee to one point of view. There was no objection
voiced to having Marnin continue as committee facilitator.
B. Adoption of Statement of Goals
Marnin reviewed the draft statement of goals as distributed by
Wawra at the April 12, 1989, meeting. Marnin noted that the memo
from Tom Hedges (noted above) basically supported this draft
statement of goals. Westley commented that he would like to see
the committee "preview" information, in addition to review, in an
attempt to correct things before they become a problem. Westley
requested an additional goal for the committee of previewing
building plans. Marnin questioned whether review of building plans
was under the authority of the committee. She stated that rather
than reviewing plans as a specified goal of the committee, City
staff would provide notice to the committee members when the MWCC
applied for the building permits. Marnin added that providing
notice of building permit applications is not an ordinary City
procedure, nor is it specifically required under the Development
Agreement.
Bassett continued this discussion regarding review of the building
plans. She stated that she had heard that the plans show a
retrofitting of the building for future expansion. Bassett
questioned Sheldon as to whether this retrofitting would be in
violation of Section 3.3(c) of the Development Agreement.
Sheldon responded that it is the City's responsibility to review
building permit applications, not the committee's or other
parties'. He stated that the City and the MWCC have a contract
regarding the plant expansion. This contract is an agreement, not
a law. The City and the MWCC can agree to anything in such a
contract, provided that it does not violate the law. Citp'staff
will review the building permit application for compliance with the
Development Agreement.
Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 3
Runkle stated that the next formal action by the City Council
regarding the Seneca Plant would be the final plat approval.
Eggink noted that Section 3.3(c) of the Development Agreement, as
referenced by Bassett in this discussion, refers to the sludge
incinerator capacity, not the plant's capacity to treat wastewater.
These are two separate issues.
Hazel inquired if there was anything that controls the maximum size
of the plant. Voth responded that the current capacity of the
plant is 24 million gallons per day (mgd). The plant capacity with
the proposed expansion will be 34 mgd. Runkle noted that any
expansion beyond a capacity of 34 mgd is not covered under the
Development Agreement and would require a new Development
Agreement.
After this discussion, the statement of goals as distributed were
adopted by the committee with the addition of the word "preview"
to the second goal (statement of goals as adopted are attached to
these minutes). It was also noted for the record that these goals
may be revised as needed at future dates.
2. Compliance with Conditions, to Date
Marnin reviewed Section 3.1 of the Development Agreement and noted
when each of the required items were submitted to the committee
members. Marnin stated that all requirements of the MWCC have been
met to date.
Bassett asked about the list of health study references that were
mailed to the committee. She wanted to know about the actual
reports. Polta stated that he would make available a copy of each
of the studies. (One copy of each of the three studies is now
available for review at City Hall).
Notification Requirements
Marnin stated that the MWCC has compiled a list of interested
citizens as required in Section 6.3 of the Development Agreement.
This list includes all adjacent property owners, other area
residents and businesses, persons who spoke as interested citizens
at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings held since
August 1988 regarding the Seneca Plant, and persons who signed a
petition regarding environmental concerns related to the Seneca
Plant.
4. Enforcement
Marnin stated that the memo from Tom Hedges (noted above) affirms
(P9
Seneca odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 4
that the Community Development Department will be the responsible
department within the City for the supervision and enforcement of
the Development Agreement for the City.
V. STATUS REPORTS
1. Construction Update
Voth stated that bids for the expansion construction are scheduled
for release June 1. The current construction will be complete by
mid-June. Voth added that the final plat application has been
submitted to the City.
Eggink reviewed the chemical test feed program currently under way.
Sodium hypochlorite is being injected upstream to test its
effectiveness on odor control.
Spencer inquired as to what sodium hypochlorite smells like, and
if he would be able to smell it. Eggink responded that sodium
hypochlorite smells like household bleach. However, the tanks
containing the sodium hypochlorite are sealed and should not
release any odors.
Bassett brought up a discussion regarding contamination of the
wells in the area. Langsdorf responded that Dakota County is
researching the matter, but the MWCC has not received the County's
reports yet. Once the reports are received, the MWCC will forward
the information to the affected residents.
Bassett inquired as to when the dewatering wells would be put in.
Voth replied that the permit for the wells has been submitted to
the MPCA, but he is not certain when the approval to install the
wells will be received.
2. Odor Complaints
Polta informed the committee that one odor complaint was received
since the last committee meeting. Review of this complaint
indicated that the odor was from either the metering station or
pumping station.
Polta distributed two hand-outs regarding odor monitoring at Lift
Station 13 and Meter Station 500.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
Runkle informed the committee that representatives from Minnesota
Public Radio (MPR) had approached the City regarding installation
of radio antenna towers in the scenic easement (Outlot A, Seneca
Addition). The City informed MPR that the easement agreement
Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 5
restricts activity in outlot A without the written authorization
of the City. Runkle added that MPR representatives may be
contacting the area residents regarding this matter.
Bassett inquired about the information contained in the April/May
1989 issue of the Metro Monitor regarding sludge and ash storage
at the Seneca Plant. Polta responded that the figures contained
in the article appear to be inaccurate.
VII/VIII. FUTURE MEETING/ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the committee will be at 5:00 p.m., Wednesday,
June 14, 1989, at Eagan City Hall.
This meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
(Ik
STATEMENT OF GOALS
SENECA ODOR CONTROL ADVISORY
To provide for information exchange and open discussion
To provide a forum for preview, review and updates of
construction progress and status
To review odor complaints
To resolve potential conflicts and difficulties by more
effective communication
Adopted May 10, 1989
11-2--
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JON HOHENSTEIN, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR
KRIS RAGEMAN, RECYCLING SPECIALIST
FROM: JEFF WELDON, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN
DATE: JUNE 9f 1989
SUBJECT: PUBLIC MEETING -DAKOTA COUNTY INCINERATOR
On Tuesday, June 6, I attended a public meeting at the Rosemount
High School sponsored by the Metropolitan Council regarding the
proposed incinerator. The intent of the meeting was to hear public
testimony regarding the scoping document which will be incorporated
in the EIS for the project. Approximately 200 people attended the
meeting. While some of those who testified were from Eagan, Apple
Valley and West St. Paul, most were from Rosemount, Hastings,
Farmington and the rural townships of Coates, Vermillien and
Empire.
Virtually all of those who testified cited health, safety and
environmental concerns. Several academicians provided testimony
about the economic implications of the project. Virtually all
individuals who testified criticized the County Board for what they
termed a lack of proper planning and failing to provide answers to
critical questions about health and safety, operations,
inspections, costs, etc. A major question was the Board's lack of
planning for the proper disposal of ash.
Dakota County Citizens Against Burning (DCCAB) displayed a petition
containing over 7,000 signatures of residents opposed to the
incinerator. The lack of positive public relations by Koch
Refinery has exacerbated acceptance problems for incinerator
proponents. Virtually every testifier cited the combination of an
incinerator and the refinery as posing unacceptable health risks.
I have a complete set of.notes and other information I picked up
if you are interested.
tive Intern
JW/vmd
l_�3
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1989
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
'Electrical
140 596
Plumbing
94 387
HVAC
124 422
Water Softener
5 25
Signs
17 57
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0 0
Sewer & Water
76 258
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
i-14
TYPE
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE
PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL FEES
7
FOUNDATION
1
$
$ 15.00
$
$ 15.00
222
SINGLE FAMILY
60
6,679,000
40,262.00
20,131.00
181,615.50
2
DUPLEX
2
174,000
1,164.00
582.00
5,761.00
21
TOWNHOUSE
13
2,212,000
11,298.00
5,649.00
112,323.50
0
CONDO
0
0
APT BLDGS
0
0
AGRICULTURAL
0
'
11
COMM/IND (NEW)
5
5,589,000
16,530.00
8,265.00
111,297.50
56
COMM/IND REMODEL
13
785,500
4,462.00
1,118.00
5 976.00
4
COMM/IND ADDITION
2
4,565,000
11,960.00
5,980.00
50,431.50
0
INSTITUTIONAL
0
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
0
9
RES. GARAGES
8
61,000
768.00
86.00
901.50
25
RES. ADD./PORCH
11
127,000
1,444.00
415.00
1,945.00
5
SWIM POOL
1
28,000
272.00
---
286.00
144
MISCELLANEOUS
55
114,100
2,036.00
215.00
2,339.50
0
DEMOLISH
0
0
HOUSE MOVES
0
MO. SUBTOTAL
171
20,334,600
90,211.00
42,441.00
472,892.00
ADJUSTMENTS
LOT CHANGE
PENALTY CO
LECTED ON B.P.
f16367
50.00
MO. TOTAL
20,334,600
90,211.00
42,441.00
472,942.00
508
51,526,115
254,155.50
120,590.00
1,354,421.60
YEAR-TO-DATE
i-14
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS — MONTHLY REPORT
DATE 14AY 1989
MULTI—FAMILY BREAKDOWN
1
MO. 11 '--m0.
#
1
MO. 11 11
YTD #
1
YTD U
1
OF a
OF
1
OF 11
OF
1
OF
TYPE
1
PERMITS 1
UNITS
a
BLDGS. 11
UNITS
1
BLDGS.
DUPLEX
1
2 1
2
1
1 11
2
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
3—PLEX
1
1
e
11
1
4—PLEX
1
8 1
8
1
2 11
12
1
3
1
1
1
11
1
1
/
1
11
e
5—PLEX
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
ee
1
1
1
1
11
1
6—P.LEX
7—PLEX
1
1
1
11
7
1
1
8—PLEX
1
5 e
40
1
5 11
64
1
8
1
1
1
11
1
10—PLEX
1
e
e
n
1
1
1
0
11
1
1
1
1
11
1
12—PLEX
1
1
1
11
1
16—PLEX
1
1
e
11
1
e
1
1
e1
e
APT. BLDG.
1
1
e
11
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
11
e
OTHER
1
1
1
el
1
e
1
e
e1
1
1
e
1
Ie
1
TOTAL
1
15 1
50
1
8 11
85
1
13
1
1
1
11
1
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL dr INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWNS
DATE MA'i 1989
BLDG.
1
I
I
I
PERMIT
8 e ADDRESS & LEGAL
1
OWNER
1
VALUATION
1
OCCUP.
16526
LONE OAK RD
;19
OPUS CORP
a $
2,974,000
a
COMM
NEW
PK 3990
F
14 M. AC ^TR IND
1
11875 PLAZA DRIVE
1
GALAXIE CLIFF
1
1,410,000
1
COMM
NEW
16399
ILI, B1 GALAXIE QUIFF PLAZAI
PLAZA PARTNER SHIPI
1
11270 YANKEE DOODLE RD
1
SIGNAL BANK
1
942,000
I
„
NEW
16428
ILI, B1, TOWN CENTRE 100 2ND1
1
I..OMM
16514
0 RAHNCLIFF CT
/I
RAHNCLIFF
249,000
1
^OMM
NEW
ILI, B3, RAHNCLIFF 2ND
1
,^.RDSSINrS_ lN.^.
1
e"
14260 LEXINGTON AVE
1
1
I
16433
IOUTLOT D, LEXINGTON PTE
e
TRI—LAND PARTNER.1
14,000
COMM
NEW
13773 HWY 149
I
WEST PUBL. CO
1
3,815,000
1
^OMM
ADD
16434
ILI B1 WEST PUBL. 2ND
1
I
1
16431
13340 PILOT KNOB RD
1
AMERICAN SOCIETY
1
750,000
1
COMM
ADD
IL6 B3 EFFRESS ADD
1
OF CEREAL CHEM.
1
1
16504
1905 YANKEE DOODLE RD
1
I
SNIDER DRUG STORE
406,000
I
IC
OMM
1MPR
ILI B1 EAG CTR IND PK #5
1
16541
11060 LONE OAK RD
I
OPUS CORP
I
1
170,000
1
1
COMM
1MPR
IL6-9,.B5, EAG CTR IND PK 3
1
16440
11030 LONE OAK RD
1
OPUS CORP
1
90,000
1,
COMM
1MPR
IL10-13. B5. EAC CTR IND PK
9
1
16418
12926 LONE OAK CIR
I
V1I:LAUME 1NDUSTRII
52,000
I
1
C OMM
1MPR
IL5, B0, EAG CTR 1ND PK 2
1
16507
13440 FEDERAL DR
1
1
NOONE'i MCMI.
1
1
18,000
1
1
COMM
1MPR
ILI B1 BICENTENNIAL 5TH
11969-1/2 SILVER BELL RD
1
1
1
16536
11.1, B1, SILVER BELL CTR
1
METRAM PROPERTIESI
13,000
a
COMM
1MPR
13440 FEDERAL DR., STE 140
1
1
1
16465
ILI B1 BICENTENNIAL 5TH
I
NOONEY MGMT
1
8,000
1
COMM
1MPR
11380 DUCKWOOD DR
1
1
1
16441
ILI, B1, EAGAN CONV. CTR.
1
K CHARLES DEVEL
a
7,000
(COMM
1MPR
12070 CLIFF RD
1
1
16463
ILI, B2 SECT 31
1
STATE OF MN
1
7,000
1
COMM
1MPR
11270 TOWN CENTRE DR
1
1
1
16480
11.3, B1, TOWN CTR 100 6TH
1
FEDERAL LAND CO
a
5,000
a COMM
1MPR
11960 CLIFF LAKE RD
16458
IL2, B1, CLIFF LAKE CTR
R H C ASSOC
a
4,000
a COMM
1MPR
11290 TOWN CENTRE DR
1
1
1
16396
I1.2 B1 TOWN CTR 70 2ND
1
SHARIN EFFR_ESS
_1
4,000 _
1
COMM
1MPR
11980 CLIFF LAKE RD
1
RHC JOINT
1
1
16483
IL2 B1 CLIFF LAKE CTR
1
VFNTIIRF 1
e
1,500
I
COMM
1MPR
a
1
1
I
I
1
1
e
a
1
1
1
1
I
I
a
1
1
1
a
1
1
J
a
1
1
a
1
e
e
l '—I (-4P
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1988
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH
Electrical 164
Plumbing 103
HVAC 119
Water Softener 12
Signs 7
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 2
YEAR-TO-DATE
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
YTD MONTHLY
582
0 :APT BLDGS
0 (AGRICULTURAL
.
•ALUA'11V1Y
raxMli ren
1r LAN nr:v FEE
TOTAL FEES
5
FOUNDATION
3
!$
$ 97.00
$
$ 97.00
266
SINGLE FA14ILY
78
7,943,900
44,552.00
! 22,276.00
210,900.50
16
DUPLEX
4
I 236,000
1,640.00
820.00
9,762.00
31
TOWNHOUSE
18
1,060,000
7,372.00
3,686.00
43,916.00
4
CONDO
275.00
27
RES. ADDITIONS
9I 95,000
952.00
0 :APT BLDGS
0 (AGRICULTURAL
4 1 COK-LrRCIAL
31 (COMM/IND REMODEL 6 ! 140,000
I 450.00 77.00 597.00
1
COMI4/IND ADDITION
0
INDUSTRIAL
O
IINSTITUTIONAL
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
2 I 637,995
I
...1,969.00
5
RES. GARAGES
3 23,000
262.00 +
275.00
27
RES. ADDITIONS
9I 95,000
952.00
233.00 1,237.00
10
SWIM POOL
6 I 53,000
580.00
57.00 664.50
150
MISCELLANEOUS
54 ,
87,300
1,678.00 I
1,728.00
1
DE14OLISH
1 I
NO
FEES
1
Hr,USE MOVES
1
30.00
30.00
554
MO. TOTALS
185
10,276,195
57,613.00
27,149.00 1 271,176.00
- 1
ADJUSTMENTS S -F.
- 1
- 166,000
- 788.00
+ 344.00
- 394.00 - 3,061.00
553
YEAR-TO-DATE
184
38,246,967
206,100.00
98,213.50 I 946,325.60
NOTE. $200 STATE SURCHARGE COLLECTED FOR & $144 T.P. FEE COLLECTED ON PREVIOUS PERMITS.
AGENDA
-REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN. MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
JUNE 20, 1989
6:30 P.M.
I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE)
II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE)
III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT MEAD BUSINESS (BLUE)
A. Presentation of 12-31-88 Annual Financial Report
B. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
P' Z 1. Resignation of Citizen Representative - Water Quality Management
Committee and Gun Club Watershed Management Organization
IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK)
F-4 A. PERSONNEL Items
P B. DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY, Abandoned Property - 1977 Chevrolet Corvette
C. LICENSE RENEWALS, Service Station Permits
PP.� D. LICENSE RENEWALS, Trailer Permits
BOE. LICENSE RENEWALS, Amusement Devices
PlZ F. PARADE PERMIT, Application for Donald Clark/Eagan 4th, of July
Association
IF,, G. APPLICATION, Massage Therapy Establishment License and Massage Therapist
License for Today's Concept of Eagan
p.14 H. SELECTION, Space Needs Analysis Consultant
I. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 10, Regarding Dog and Cat Regulation and
rog Licensing
WAIVER OF PIAT, B.H. Grace Corporation, Lot 1, Block 6, Vienna Woods,
/ Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership
Z
<K. AMENDMENTS, to the 1989 Waste Abatement/Recycling Funding Application
1 L. CONTRACT 89-14, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Water Treatment:Plant -
' Dehumidification)
$1M. PROJECT 575, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (James Ct.
o Streetlights)
�1,� O N. PROJECT 570, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing (Cliff
Ridge Addition - Storm Sewer)
p .Z,% 0. CONTRACT 89-09, Approve Plans/Authorize Ad for Bids (Johnny Cake Ridge
r aa Road Extension)
r 1 P. VEHICLE #219, Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Sewer Vac -All)
i Q. CONTRACT 88-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedarvale Boulevard -
Overlay)
0joR. PROJECT 574, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report (Eagandale
10�' Industrial Park - Streetlights)
.375. GAMBLING LICENSE, Firefighters Relief Association (This ?.tem has beer
Withdrawn)
e3ST. SHOW LICENSE, for a Carnival and Public Show, Eagan Lions Fourth of July
Celebration
U. LICENSE (Temporary), for Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor, Eagan Lions
Fourth of July Celebration
O. 1 V. CONTRACT 88-17, Approve Resolution Restricting On Street Parking (Silver
1 Bell Road and Nicols Road)
W. PROJECT 533, Approve Resolution Restricting On Street Parking ( Diffley
Road)
R. CONTRACT 87-WW, Final Acceptance (Kindercare Addition - Storm Sewer)
Y. CONTRACT 88-22, Approve Change Order #1 Revised (Yorkton 2nd Addition -
Storm Sewer)
•�� Z. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 6, Repeal Dance Ordinance
P y4 AA. CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 8, Traffic Regulations
QV. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON)
A. PROJECT 569, Armstrong Business Center - Utilities
B. VACATE Utility Easements, Whispering Woods 4th Addition
VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID)
P` of A. APPOINTMENT of City Insurance Representative
• ZB. CONSIDER MODIFICATION, Trailway Along Lexington Point Pkwy & Daniel
P 8 Drive
C. SPECIAL PERMIT for Northern Natural Gas Company to Construct a Steel
PFrame Building Over an Existing Meter and Regulator Facility, Located
on Outlot A, Fairway Hills 1st Addition.
�9 D. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc., to Allow a
l 40 Foot Tall, V-Shaped Billboard Advertising Sign on Lot 2, Block 1, S
/& W Industrial Acres
E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT EXTENSION, General Pump, 3380 Highway 149, A Four
Month Extension for Their Temporary Mobile Office
l0 F. SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT, for Tri-Land Partnership of Eagan for a
Miniature Golf Course Addition to Their Tee Time in Eagan Driving Range
Located in the Lexington South PD
\3 G. CONTRACT 89-16, Review Design Alternative (Sterns Addition - Streets)
�II. NEW BUSINESS (TAN)
().�\ A. CODIFICATION of 1989 City Code Amendments
1
,,10B. REZONING, Kings Wood 4th Addition/Horne Development Corp., of 3.05 A
(Agricultural) Acres and a 1.73 R-3/PD (Townhouse Residential/Planned
Development) Acres to an R-1 (Single Family) District and a PRELIMINARY
PLAT Consisting of Eight Single Family Lots Located West of Cutters Lane
/ in the NE 1/4 of Section 21
P,13� C. REZONING, The Woodlands 3rd Addition/Robert Engstrom Companies, of 2.54
A (Agricultural) Acres to an R-1 (Single Family) District and a
PRELIMINARY PLAT Consisting of 37 Single Family Lots on 19.5 Total Acres
(16.96 Acres Currently Zoned R-1) Located at the Northeast Corner of
I� Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the SE 1/4 of Section 14
CITY CODE AMENDMENT to Chapter 5, to Allow Off-Sale Liquor Stores to be
Open on January 1 and July 4
5$ E. CONTRACT 89-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Armstrong Business Center -
�'� Utilities)
VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (COLD)
IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN)
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XI. ADJOURNMENT
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 14, 1989
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR JUNE 20, 3.989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
After approval
meeting minutes
meetings that w
are in order fo:
is given to the
for the June 6
ere held on May
consideration.
June 20, 1989 agenda and regular
City Council meeting and special
9 and May 30, the following items
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT
A. Presentation of 12-31-88 Annual Financial Report --The firm of
Deloitte, Haskins & Sells has completed their review of all
financial transactions for 1988 and the financial report for that
calendar year, including general fund, public enterprise and all
special funds is in order for consideration by the City Council.
Upon completion of the 1988 audit, the Director of Finance and the
City Administrator have meet several times with representatives of
Deloitte, Haskins & Sells to discuss the report in detail. For a
copy of the management letter and financial report, refer to those
enclosed documents without page number.
If any member of the City Council has a question on any of the
financial transactions or recommendations as they appear in the
management letter, please feel free to contact the City
Administrator at any time prior to Tuesday. Representatives of DHS
will be at the meeting to make a brief presentation and answer any
questions from the City Council. Once the Annual Financial Report
is adopted, a copy will be submitted to the state auditor's office
to comply with the June 30 deadline that has been placed on all
cities in the State of Minnesota for submission of annual financial
reports. Also copies will be placed at the library and city
offices for inspection by the public.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
Annual Financial Report for 1988 as prepared by the firm, Deloitte,
Haskins & Sells.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
B. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Resignation of Citizen Representative - Water Quality
Management Committee 6 Gun Club Watershed Management Organization-
-Enclosed on page -5 is a letter of resignation from Scott
Merkley who has been a citizen's representative on the Water
Quality Management Committee .and the Board of Managers for the Gun
Club Lake WMO. Scott, as a member of the Planning Commission and
previous employee with the City of Eagan, has been a valuable asset
to both organizations and his resignation will be surely missed.
The Public Works Director would like to discuss with the City
Council the status of both organizations in relationship to the
necessity of replacing this individual.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept the resignation
of Scott Merkley from the Watershed Management Committee and Gun
Club Watershed Management organization and authorize his,
replacement as appropriate.
June 12, 1989
Mr. Thomas Colbert
Director of Public Works
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Mn. ,55122
Dear Mr. Colbert:
RECE'VE,D JLM 14 Mg
This letter is to inform you of my decision to resign from both the Water
Quality Task Force and the Gun Club Water Management Organization.
This difficult decision was necessitated by the increasing amount of time
I'm spending away from home. The birth of my daughter has made me
reevaluated my priorities.
I want to thank you and the City Council for giving me the opportunity to
serve Eagan the past few years on these two Commissions. This experience
has been both learning and rewarding for me. I hope I have made a positive
contribution..
Please inform the City Council of my decision.
Sincerely,
Scott M. Merkley
0
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 20, 1989
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR JUNE 20, 1989
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Personnel Items
Item 3. Temporary Receptionist --Device Muccio-Grout, one of two
receptionists at Eagan Municipal Center, has applied for her child
care leave for expecting a new born baby for a period of four to
six months, beginning August 1, 1989. It will be necessary for the
City to hire a temporary worker to replace her for that period of
time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the advertisement
for a temporary receptionist for the Eagan Municipal Center to
cover the child care leave of Denice Muccio-Grout.
H. Selection of Space Needs Analysis Consultant --As referenced
on page 15 of the Agenda Information memo, there were five (5)
firms interviewed by a selection committee on Friday, June 16 for
the purpose of selecting an architectural firm to perform a Space
Needs Analysis. For a summary of the interviews and recommendation
by the selection committee, refer to a memo prepared by Assistant
to the City Administrator Hohenstein enclosed on pages 16A through
(o� Also included with the memo is a copy of the rating sheet
and questions that werq_iised by the committee during the interview
process.
The Space and Staffing Needs Analysis for the Municipal Center and
Law Enforcement needs, to include Fire Administration, will be
similar to the report as prepared for the Public Works facility
earlier this year.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Space Needs
Analysis submitted by BRW.
OLD BUSINESS
B. Consider Modification for Trailway Along Lexington Point
Parkway and Daniel Drive --Mr. Jim Jensen, who resides at 863 Rogers
Court, has requested information from the City on the safety of
bicyclists riding on trails or city streets. Apparently, Mr.
Jensen has acquired a report entitled "Effective Cycling" prepared
by John Forrester, who addresses reasons for cycling accidents.
This report is approximately fifteen (115) years old referencing
data acquired in 1974. Most of the study addressing cycling
accidents that have occurred on public streets where a bikes only
lane is designated and no off-street trail is provided. The study
also addresses only bicycles. Larry Billmeyer, an investigator
with the Police Department, has told Mr. Jensen in a letter, "It
was my opinion that bike trails were safer, because all the
information I had, including Forrester's report, says that
accidents on trails were bruises and broken bones compared to more
fatalities on the road. Also, most bike accidents are because of
rider error." He also stated that, "Forrester was dealing with an
old survey, and that a lot of his writing was his opinion. I said
that I was not aware of any accurate survey of accidents on bike
trails due to the fact that there are a lot of bike accidents never
reported." Mr. Jensen may appear at the meeting on Tuesday and
address a book called "Effective Cycling" that was written by John
Forrester. Our Police Department in their examination of
accidents, all of which were bike accidents that occurred in
traffic, feel that off-street trails are a much safer means of
bicycle, pedestrian and small children movement than no trails
causing the same kind of use to occur on the public street. The
study is quite lengthy, and if any member of the City Council would
like to glance at the report during the meeting, the City
Administrator will have a copy of the report and letters of
correspondence from Larry Billmeyer, police investigator., to the
Director of Parks & Recreation.
D. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to
Allow a 40 Foot.Tall V -Shed Billboard Advertising Sign --Enclosed
on pages O throughL-is a copy of the staff memo that
surveyed everal communities for outdoor advertising sign
regulations as requested by the City Council.
CONSENT AGENDA
L: Contract '89-14, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Water Treatment
Plant) --On Monday, June 19, a bid opening was held for the above -
referenced project. Enclosed on page opening
the results of that
bid opening.
Q. Contract 88-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedarvale
Boulevard') --While it was anticipated to receive the bids and award
the contract for the above -referenced project on June 20, formal
approval from the MnDOT Municipal State Aid office has not yet been
received precluding the City's ability to award the contract
without jeopardizing state funding for this project. Therefore,
it is recommended that this item be continued for two weeks to
allow the City to secure State Aid approval prior to contract award
thereby complying with MnDOT funding requirements.
NEW BUSINESS
E. Contract 89-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Armstrong Business
Center - Utilities) --On Monday, June 19, a bid opening was held for
the above -referenced project. Enclosed on page KIM are the
results of that bid opening.
/S/ Thus L. Hedges
City Administrator
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: JUNE 19, 1989
SUBJECT: SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS CONSULTANT SELECTION
On Friday, June 16, 1989, a selection team consisting of Police Chief Geagan,
Parks and Recreation Director Vraa, Assistant Chief Building Official Hanson and
ourselves interviewed the five finalists for the space needs analysis and
reviewed their respective bids for the service. Again those firms were:
The Alliance $71,905
BRW 34,640
Thorbeck & Lambert 36,380
Vanney Associates 33,676
Winsor/Faricy 41,832
All proposals exceeded the $30,000 budget allocation for this item. This
variance occured due to the unique nature of project for different cities. The
budget estimate was based on work done by similar firms for comparably sized
cities and organizations.
Being a contract for service the City is not constrained to the lowest bid, but
has broader latitude to select the proposal which gives the best service for
dollar value. The selection team recommends that BRW be selected to perform the
work at a cost not to exceed $34,640 and that additional funds be allocated for
this item. While all of the firms were responsive to the Request for Proposal,
BRW showed a better understanding of thework and brought an excellent
combination of competencies to the project when compared with the other firms.
BRW also demonstrated more experience than the low proposal. All members of the
selection team listed BRW as their first choice.
The group made, use of the attached rating worksheet and questions in the
selection process. If the Council has any questions in this regard, I plan to
be present at the Council meeting on Tuesday evening.
Ass stent to the City Administrator
L
PRESENTATION RATING WORKSHEET
SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
JUNE lb, 1989
Evaluator:
Firm:
Points Points
Possible Awarded
1. Responsiveness of the presenter to the
detailed scope of work. Assess understanding,
depth of preparation and completeness. 15
Comments:
2. Quality of proposal and presentation content.
Rate the written and oral approach of the firm
with a focus on substantive content. 10
Comments:
3. Competence and feasibility of the firm's
approach to the project. Rate the structure
and validity of the firm's proposed approach. 20
Comments:
4. Responsiveness of presenter to questions by
the review committee. Assess presenter's
knowledge of firm, proposal and scope of work. 10
Comments:
5. Relationship of experience to the scope of work.
Assess the firm's ability to perform the work
based upon previous similar or related experience. 10
Comments:
6. Qualifications and involvement of key personnel.
Rate the proposal on the incorporation of key
players including firm management and project
personnel with quality experience in this area. 15
Comments
7. Apparent value of proposal for the cost proposed.
Does the firm offer acceptable service at the cost
defined. If not the lowest cost bidder, does the
firm offer sufficient value above and beyond its
competitors to justify the additional expense? 10
Comments:
8. Ability to work with staff and Council. Assess
the firm's ability to work with key decision
makers for the City. 10
Comments:
Other Comments:
TOTAL 100
( W L
SPACE AND STAFFING NEEDS ANALYSIS
INTERVIEW QUESTIONS
1, Will the named principal be involved in the day-to-day functions of
completing this project?
2. Having had an opportunity to develop an approach to the scope of work as
it pertains to the facilities involved, what do you intuitively expect to
be feasible design alternatives? In short, without prejudicing the
conclusions of the study, where do you think we may end up?
3. What size public safety departments, if any, has your firm done work for?
Will the people who did that work be involved in this project? How
familiar are you with the Minnesota Department of Corrections rules for
holding facilities?
4. What is the extent of .your experience in assisting clients in the analysis
and reduction of multiple alternatives as is outlined in the scope of work?
5. Which previous project or projects do you consider to be most similar to
this and how is this similar and different?
[ 0
COACHMAN WATER TREATMENT PLANT
DEHUMIDIFICATION
CITY CONTRACT NO. 89-14
PROJECT NO. 565
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1989
BID TIME: 11:00 A.M.
BID DATE: MONDAYS JUNE 19j 1989
CONTRACTORS
TOTAL BASE BID
1. Enviren - Con. Inc.
$
47,385.00
2. Paven Mechanical
52,200.00
3. Kumar Mechanical
61,500.00
4. P & L Mechanical
61,975.00
LOW BID
$
47v385.00
Feasibility Report Estimate
$
28,865.00
Engineer's Estimate
34,000.00
$ Over (+) Under (-) F.R.
+ 64.1%
$ Over (+) Under (-) E.E.
+ 39.4.%
Budgeted Amount
$
60,000.00
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: DALE C. RUNKLE, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY
DATE: JUNE 19, 1989
RE: REVIEW OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED BY CITY COUNCIL
The Department of Community Development has reviewed the Sign
ordinance for size of advertising signs along major arterial
highways. The survey conducted of communities adjacent to major
highways varies from not allowing any advertising to permitting
Agricultural signs consisting of 750 sq. ft. Therefore, the
criteria runs fourfold in allowing the size of sign that the
community wants within the Sign Ordinance. The Department of
Community Development has also researched other ordinances which
would be more restrictive than Eagan's present Sign Ordinance.
In research submitted for review by Naegele Outdoor Advertising,
please find a map showing existing and proposed locations for
additional advertising signs. There are possibly three locations
in which additional advertising signs could be obtained on a
limited time basis. Since only three could meet the existing
Ordinance criteria, staff asks if we want to get into the full
review of the Sign Ordinance as it relates to advertising signs.
Presently, the criteria for advertising signs is: 1) must be
located in an Agricultural/Commercial zoned undeveloped property.
2) The spacing criteria must be 1,000 ft. from other advertising
signs and 300' from residential zoned property. 3) The property
be undeveloped and that no other sign be allowed on the property
such as a general advertising sign. 4) Also, that these signs be
300' from any existing pylon or general advertising signs for a
particular facility.
It has been determined that very few additional sizes can be
located in accordance with the Sign Ordinance so the Council does
have the provision within the Ordinance to allow only 250 sq. ft.
per sign and has the discretion to increase the square footage on
an individual basis as seen fit.
Staff would suggest no change in the Sign Ordinance at the present
time as it is restrictive in nature and will only allow very few
opportunities for additional advertising signs. The City does have
the discretion to allow on a "case by case" basis, the size of sign
over and above 250 sq. ft. at each of the proposed locations.
In the June 16 meeting with the Naegele representatives, it was
discussed that, at this time staff proposed no change in the Sign
Ordinance. Because of the few opportunities available to them at
that time, Naegele did indicate that they would potentially
negotiate some other locations to remove existing signs in order
IoO
to get this sign, as well as others, in the future. Staff has not
pursued any of the negotiations for the removal of existing signs.
If there is any concern to the Council on any signs within the
City, please make note as to the location and staff will be happy
to work with Naegele on the relation or removal of existing signs.
This should update you as to the status of the discussions with
Naegele. If you have future questions or concerns, please advise.
1 ) X-C) V
Director of Community Development
DCR/js
Attach.
fnq-�>
(STRONG BUSINESS CENTER
PROJECT NO. 569
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
1989
CONTRACTORS
1. Ceca Utilities
2. B & D Underground
3. Channel Const.
4. Annandale Contracting
LOW BID
Feasibility Report Estimate
Engineer's Estimate
% Over (+) Under (-) F.R. & E.E.
BID TIME: 10:30 A.M.
BID DATE: MONDAY, JUNE 19, 1969
TOTAL BASE BID
$ 111,951.14
123,796.00
125,699.70
134,056.28
$ 111,951.14
$ 136,600.00
l5 FIA
136,600.00
- 18 %
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 20, 1989
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Tee Time In Eagan Driving Range/Request for Refund
of Sewer and Water Assessment Charles
Item 2. First Amendment to Development Contract/Cray Addition
Item 3. RTB Appointment
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1,. Approve Declaration of Covenants (The Waters Development
Lone Oak Addition)
Item 2. Grading and Excavation Permit #18-189 (Seneca Wastewater
Treatment Plant), Extended Hours of Operation
Item 3. Vacate Portion of Public Right -of -Way, Receive
Petition/order Public Hearing (Fairway Hills Frontage
Road)
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 19, 19.89
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Council reserves the right to hold an executive session
for attorney/client matters if requested by either the City
Attorney, City Administrator or members of the City Council. The
City Administrator would like a few minutes with the City Council
immediately after the meeting to discuss pending negotiations
between the Police Dispatchers and the City.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Item 1. Tee Time In Eagan Driving Range/Request for Refund
of Bowe Water Assessment Charges --Enclosed on pages
through is a letter from Sharon Swenson, representing Tri nd
Companies requesting a refund of the sewer and water assessment
charges in the amount of $1,315 to Sons Construction. Tri -Land is
requesting that Tee -Time in Eagan not be required to pay for these
fees and that these fees will go with the land and be paid at such
time as the commercial property is platted per normal city
assessment policy.
It was determined by the City at the time the building permit was
applied for by Sons Construction on behalf of Tri -Land Partnership
that a trunk sewer and trunk water unit charge be assessed against
the project. Since Tee Time in Eagan is connecting to both the
City's water and sewer utility system it seemed appropriate that
a one unit assessment be collected.
Normally the City would assess this rate and not apply it to a
building permit, however, the total outstanding assessment against
the Lexington South Development is considerably higher and was
waived by previous City Council action until the entire property
is developed. This assessment will be a credit against the total
assessment toward Lexington South Commercial property.
ACTION TO HE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a request
by Tri -Land Companies that the City not require payment of the
sewer and water assessment charges in the amount of $1,315 for
trunk water and trunk sewer one unit connection until the
commercial property is platted and developed in the future.
l -YA
Item 2. First Amendment to Development Contract/Cray Addition --
Both Cray Research and the City of Eagan have agreed to amend the
development contract for McCrea Addition to provide for an
additional financial guarantee in connection with the installation
of water main laterals, sanitary sewer laterals and services under
the City's Public Project 89-E.
In order to amend the development contract the escrow requirement
must be increased to secure the full performance of the development
contract. The development financial guarantee calculations have
been prepared and are agreeable to Cray Research.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the first
amendment to the development contract between Cray Research Inc.
and the City of Eagan for Cray Addition.
Item 3. RTS Appointment --Liz Witt, representing the Mendota
Heights city council, has expressed interest in seeking the RTB
appointment. Apparently Jean White who is a member of the Prior
Lake City Council is also expressing an interest. There is no
action required unless the City Council would like to endorse Liz
Witt or another person of your choice as referenced in the
informative memo that was sent out last Friday.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
Item 1. Approve Declaration of Covenants (.The Waters Development -
Lone Oak Addition) --City staff has been working with the Laukka-
Beck Company and the Wachovia Bank & Trust Company pertaining to
their proposal to provide landscaping within the public right-of-
way and center medians along with passive landscaping lighting,
irrigation systems and overall street lighting within the Lone Oak
Addition development more commonly referred to as The Waters.
Because of concerns staff had pertaining to the future maintenance
obligations and related financial responsibilities for maintaining
these private amenities within public right-of-way, a formal
covenant was prepared addressing these issues. This covenant
states that it shall be the responsibility of the property
presently owned by Wachovia and that the City has the right to
perform any required maintenance up to, and including, total
removal if the obligated property owners do not maintain it in an
acceptable manner. All costs incurred by future City involvement
would be levied as an assessment against the affected property.
This agreement has been reviewed by the attorney's office and found
to be in order for favorable Council action.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Declaration
of Covenants for The Waters (Lone oak Addition) pertaining to
landscaping, landscape lighting and street lighting and authorize
the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
Item 2. Grading/Excavation Permit #18-189 (Seneca Wastewater
Txsatment Plant), Extended Hours of Operation --Enclosed on page
is a letter received from the contractor doing the earth
moving operations associated with the expansion of the Seneca
Wastewater Treatment Plant requesting that the extended working
hours previously approved for 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. be extended
from the previous estimated complet�i�(rn-o date of June 22, 1989, to
July 29, 1989. Enclosed on page t Uis a copy of the April 4
minutes. which did not specifically reference the June 22 expiration
date for the extended hours varianced to this grading permit.
However, due to the sensitivity of this project, staff felt it
would be appropriate to have the Council formally acknowledge the
extended deadline for this variance to the ordinance regarding
working hours. The Engineering Division has not received any
complaints regarding .this grading operation to date.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the extension of
the variance for working hours for grading permit EX18-189 (Seneca
WWTP) through July 29, 1989.
Item 3. vacate Portion of Public Right -of -Way, Receive
Petition/Order Public Hearing (Fairway Hills Frontage Road) --Their
presently exists a 28' public dedicated right-of-way for a frontage
road between Pilot Knob Road and Fairway Hills north of Camelback
Drive. With the final development of the Fairway Hills
subdivision, there no longer exists a need for this future frontage
road right-of-way as a public street will not be constructed within
it. Present City Ordinances require a minimum 50' setback from the
existing adjacent single family lot creating a hardship for the
highest and best development of that property. Subsequently, a
petition has been received to vacate this excess public right-of-
way. It would be appropriate to receive the petition and formally
schedule a public hearing to receive all comments and concerns from
any potentially affected entity.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:
vacate a portion of the Fairway Hills
a public hearing to be held on July 18,
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
\8
To receive the petition to
frontage road and schedule
1989.
TRI -LAND COMPANIES
May 22. 198b
Mayor & City Council Members
City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan. MN 55121
RE: TEE TIME IN EAGAN DRIVING RANGE
Dear Mayor & Council Members,:
Towne Centre Professional Bldg.
Suite 202
1260 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan, MN 55121
612452-7850
Tee Time In Eagan has now opened and we are extremely pleased
with the support of the Council, Planning Commission. and Eagan
City Staff Members in assisting us in making this range a
reality.
As this project was handled differently than other projects
within the City of Eagan we occasionally experienced difficultvf
as the parameters were not clearly defined for staff members. We
ultimately worked out all these issues. however, one item remains
that Staff and I differ on. Therefore. I would respectfully
request the that the City Council issue its opinion as to how
this particular matter should be resolved.
I am enclosing a photocopy of the building permit which was
issued by the City of Eagan. The builder is Sons Construction.
You will note that trunk sewer and trunk water charges were in-
cluded on this permit. Sons Construction contacted me and said
that these were not normal charges on a building permit and asked
for clarification. I met with Gene V,anOverbeke at the City Hall
to discuss this matter as the building department stated that
these charges were added per his direction. Mr. VanOverbeke in-
formed me that the charges are normally not part of a building
permit but represent assessments for availability of sewer and
water.
In my discussions with Mr. VanOberbak. I pointed out that the
City Council specifically waived platting for the golf range and
that they further waived payment of any assessments until such
time as any or all of the commercial project owned by Tri -Land
Partnership of Eagan would be platted. I further discussed the
fact that Patrick Road is a private Road which has not yet been
dedicated to the City and Tee Time hooked into the laterals which
are underneath Patrick Drive.
l3�-
May 22. 1989
Mayor & City Council
Page Two
Mr. VanOverbeke said that he felt that these charges should be
paid as sewer and water is available to Tee Time and that these
amounts will be credited after payment is made for assessments
which are levied on the 50 acre commercial tract. My concern is
that Sons Construction was required to make this payment and any
refund should go to them. Further,, it should not be the burden
of Sons Construction to pay for assessments as part of a building
permit. (This makes the cost of this building permit 18% of the
total cost of the structure. I reviewed another building permit
recently issued to Sons Construction and the cost of that permit
was 2% of the total structure. Certainly this is inequitable.)
I understand that these assessments will be a future expense of
this commercial development. However, as the City Council stated
that $11 assessments would be deferred because we did not proceed
with the platting on this property, I did not budget for payment
of assessment charges. I would respectfully request that the
City Council consider my request to refund the sewer and water
assessment charges in the amount of $1,315.00 to Sons
Construction. I would further request that Tee Time In Eagan not
be required to pay for these fees and that these fees will go
with the land and be paid at such time as the commercial property
is platted per normal City assessment policy.
Thank you for your consideration.
V r ruly yours,
daPoWlPens&on
SKS :alr
cc: Lee Bisel
Don Olsen
DING RANGE CITY OF EAGAN .ti 16433
6 STORAGE 9530 Pilot Knob Road, P.O. Box 21.199, Eagan, MIN 55121
.DING PERMIT PHONE: 454.5100 Q D�/
Receipt M t�• A
.beusedfor COl.HEgCIA1. Est. Value ;14-0C
Address 4260 LEXINGTON AVF
��— D Block Sac/Sub. 1;s:XIhQTQN POTNT
Parcel No.
Name TNT -LAND PARTNFkSHIP
�` Address X260 YANKEE DOOD F I2D
.City. EACAN Phor� 452-7ti50
11 Name - SONS rnNCTR11rTTDN
i Address 1174 ST ANng FV Rf Vi1
.City FACAN Phone. 442 -5 -ASS
ppppNW Name RRTAN AIIQTimr - - -----
uV Address 11,74 QT AWngFV R1 V❑
aW
City FAGAN Phone 452-1155
Chereby acknowlege the /have reAd thts`,applicai.m and stale -that the
'110mull.on is correct a�vagree bompl w /MI applicao;a State of
Mnresda Statutes and r pf E nOr di- ,ee�
000{{{ a:
SgrWum of Factoriesll�it`�
A Budding Permit is issued'.,lo: SON. CONSTRUCTION
On the express Condition that all work shall be donB in accordance with all
applicable Slate of Minnesota Statutes and Ciy of Eagan Ordinances.
9udoutg Obicial iiA,j`� tP14 I ti
acwancr
ZX -Q
(Actual) Lcnel
(Albraue)
e N Stories
Length
Depth
S.F. Total
S.F. Footprints
On Sile Sewage
On Sae Well
MWCC Syelnn
City Water
PRV Required
Booaler PUMP
FICE USE ONLY
pu
ifi60.On OCt ti'^�����
-Y-N
Blog. Fernut 154.00
i
Surcharge 7 -nn
-221
Plan Review 77 _ nn
12c
SAC. City 100.00
484
—4A4
SAC, MCWCC 575.pO
APPROVALS ilk StleCr
Planner
Water Corn ,C`L
1
Water Motor �
Acct Deposit
SWy Pemut ---20.&0
SW&H&Arge 1.OLf ;
Tnatmant Pl 22A_nn (j,(2rrrf�a L4.
1ba}llrut AS's nn u�IT 6-
Cduml 1Ysa1S.'"Si1(et a&""
ifi60.On OCt ti'^�����
aldg: 011. Cop,"
Variance TOTAL
2.477.00 i0�•
icl
RECEIVED JUN 16 1989
GIC611 � COOSTRUCTIOn MOWN
P.O. Box 458 - Northfield, Minnesota 55057 - 507-645-8962 612-333-1307
June 15, 1989
Mr. Tom Colbert
City Engineer
3795 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Seneca Waste Water Treatment Plant
Site Preparation
Dear Mr Colbert;
On April 4, 1989, the City Council granted Enebak Construction Company
extended working hours at the Seneca Project to remain in effect
until June 22, 1989. Our completion date for the project has been
extended to July 29, 1989.
At this time., we ask that the, extended working hours remain in
effect until the new completion date of July 29, 1989.
Thank you for your cooperation,.
Sincerely,
Dave Klee
Project Manager
t$5
"An Equal Opportunity Employer"
Page 2/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
April 4, 1989
SENEGA HASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT/GRADING PERMIT
City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council the
contractor was requesting that the hours of operation allowed by the
ordinance be extended to allow the work to be performed between 6:00
a.m, and 10:00 p.m. A representative from Enebak Construction Company
was present at the meeting.
Councilmember Wachter requested that the contractor refrain from
going through the residential areas after hours. Councilmember Egan
questioned if the staff requested any further conditions. Public
Works Director Tom Colbert responded that no further conditions were
requested with this application, but that the matter could be
evaluated if there were a problem.
Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve a variance
to the hours of operations for excavation/grading permit number
18-189 (Seneca WWTP) to allow the work to be performed between 6:00
a.m, and 10:00 p.m.,, subject to the condition that the contractor
refrain from going through the residential areas after hours. All
members present voted in favor.
POLICE DEPARTMENT/AUTOMOBILE CONFISCATION
City Administrator Tom Hedges distributed a memo regarding the
automobile confiscation by the Police. He suggested selling the
automobile and using the money for drug enforcement.
Councilmember Wachter suggested the City take possession and
perhaps the confiscated vehicle could be used to replace the City's
older automobile. Councilmember Egan questioned if the secured party
would forfeit its rights. The matter will be investigated.
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion to authorize the
purchase of a 1989 Ford Bronco that is subject to forfeiture under
M.S.S. regarding the sale of narcotics. All members present voted in
favor.
MTC SERVICE
City Administrator Tom Hedges reported to the Council the
necessity to schedule a work session for April 17, 1989, at 7:00 p.m.
to discuss the MTC service area.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the
scheduling of a work session for April 17, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. to
discuss the MTC service area. All members present voted in favor.
"THE MORNING AFTER"
JUNE 20, 1989
"The Morning After" is an extremely brief report of the action that was taken
by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on June 20, 1989. There are
no details reported in this account; however, the action taken by the City
Council on each of the agenda items and each of the other business items is
reflected.
DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS
1.
The Annual Financial Report for 1988 as prepared by the firm, Deloitte,
Haskins 6 Sells was approved.
2.
The resignation of Scott Merkley from the Watershed Management Committee
and Gun Club Watershed Management Organization was accepted and
authorization was given to find an appropriate replacement.
K._C
awa
3.
A grand opening for Fire Stations 4 and 5 is scheduled for Sunday, July
9.
CONSENT AGENDA
4.
The Council was informed of the hiring of Lane Wegener as Engineering Tech.
.r—e_
Approval had been given to hire an Engineering Tech at the June 6, 1989
City Council meeting without an actual candidate being named.
yi5.
The Council was informed of the hiring of John Carlson as seasonal street
maintenance worker, which was approved by the City Administrator upon the
resignation of a seasonal street maintenance worker.
6.
Approval was given to advertise for a temporary receptionist for Eagan
Municipal Center beginning approximately August 1, 1989 for a period of
four to six months to replace Denice Mucchio-Grout who will be taking child
care leave starting August 1.
7.
Authorization was given to declare a 1977 Chevrolet Corvette as surplus
property.
1.
8.
Approval was given to renew service station permits for 15 service stations
which are named on the attached sheet.
9.
The following 6 trailer permits were continued until the July 5, 1989 City
Council meeting:
Tripp Oil Co.
Earl Maroltzke
Alwin 6 Lyle Schultz
Edmund Schwanz
Dakota Homes
Jim Horne
eezz
10.
Approval was given to renew the amusement devises for 1989 which are named
on the attached sheet.
11. A parade permit was approved for the 4th of July Association for the annual
parade that is included as a part of the 4th of July festivities.
R12. A message therapy establishment license was approved in the name of Today's
Concept of Eagan and message therapist licenses were approved for Kathleen
Maurer, Elizabeth Gangl and Robin Oxborough.
1%L 13. Selection of the architectural firm of B.R.W. 6 Associates to prepare a
space needs analysis for the municipal center, law enforcement and fire
administration needs was authorized.
AOL
14.
Approval was given to the City Code amendment to Chapter 10 regarding dog
and cat regulation and dog licensing as revised.
15.
Approval was given to a waiver of plat for B. H. Grace Corporation, Lot
1, Block 6, Vienna Woods for a duplex lot split to allow individual
ownership.
16.
Authorization was given to an amendment to the Community Landfill Abatement
_
Funding program to include: 1) a stump grinder as a capital acquisition
for the Parks 6 Recreation Department and 2) additional funds for the
abatement goal set at 98 to be used for payments to haulers if the City's
goals are exceeded.
17.
Bids were received for Contract 89-14 (Water Treatment Plan -
Dehumidification) and the contract was awarded to Environ -Con Inc.
18.
The petition for Project 575 (James Court -Streetlights) was received and
authorization was given to prepare a feasibility report.
19.
The feasibility report for Project 570 (Cliff Ridge Addition -Storm Sewer)
was received and a public hearing was authorized to be held on July 18.
20.
The plans and specs for Contract 89-09 (Johnny Cake Ridge Rd extension)
were approved and the advertisement for bid opening was authorized for
10:00 a.m., Friday, July 14.
21.
The bids for vehicle #219 (Sewer Vac -all) were received and authorization
given for purchase from Ruffridge-Johnson Equipment Co.
22.
The bids were received for Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Blvd -Overlay) and this
item was continued until the July 5, 1989 meeting awaiting State aid
approval.
t�
23.
The petition for Project 574 (Eagandale Industrial Park -Streetlights) was
++—
received and authorization given to prepare a feasibility report
incorporating the entire Industrial Park.
J�,,/JJ �''24.
A temporary gambling license to be used for pull tabs by the Firefighters
Relief Association during the July 4th celebration was withdrawn.
25.
A show license for a carnival and public show to the Eagan Lions Club for
the July 4th celebration was approved.
26.
A non -intoxicating malt liquor license for the Eagan Lions Club for the
July 4th celebration festivities from June 30 to July 5 was approved.
27.
The resolution restricting on -street parking for portions of Silver Bell
Rd 6 Nichols Rd for Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Blvd -Resurfacing) was
approved.
28.
A resolution restricting on -street parking for Project 533 (Diffley Rd)
was approved.
29.
Contract 87 -WW (Kindercare-Storm Sewer) for perpetual City maintenance
subject to all warranty provisions was accepted.
30.
Change Order #1 revised for Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition -Storm
Sewer) was approved.
31.
City Code Chapter 6 was amended by repealing a provision relating to dances
as presented.
32.
The amendment to traffic regulations section that adopts MSA Chapters 168,
169 and 171 by reference was approved and Eagan City Code Chapter 1, and
Section 8.99 was adopted by reference.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
33. The public hearing was closed and Project 569 (Armstrong Business Center -
Utilities) was approved.
34. The bids were received for Contract 89-15 (Armstrong Business Center -
Utilities) and the contract was awarded to the lowest responsible bidder
which is Ceca Utilities with the deletion of the sanitary sewer.
35. The public hearing was closed and approval was given to the vacation of
various street and utility easements located within the Whispering Woods
4th Addition.
OLD BUSINESS
36. The appointment of First Insurance to act as the City's representative on
all property casualty, liability and workers compensation insurance and
further to include and provide advise, training and other related direction
in the area of risk management was approved.
AftV 37. A trailway alignment along Lexington Pointe Parkway and Daniel Drive was
eliminated subject to the Developer relocating the trail around the west
and south perimeter of the Lexington Pointe subdivisions.
38. The special permit for Northern Natural Gas to construct a steel frame
building over the existing meter and regulatory facility was continued
until the July 18 meeting.
U39. Action was taken to deny the conditional use permit for Naegele Outdoor
Advertising to allow a billboard advertising sign in an LI district.
DaA 40. Authorization was given to a special use permit extension for General Pump
allowing a four month extension for their temporary mobile office.
12k 41. Authorization was given to an amendment to the special use permit for Tri -
Land Partnership to allow a miniature golf area in addition to the driving
�,, range.
[/ 42. The feasibility report's proposed design associated with the street
�� construction for Contract 89-16 (Sterns Addition) was approved.
NEW BUSINESS
43. The codification of the 1989 City Code Amendments was approved.
Q 44. Authorization was given to 1) the rezoning of 3.05 ag acres and 1.73 R-
3/PD acres within the Blackhawk Park plan development to an R-1 district,
and 2) a preliminary plat entitled Kings Wood 4th Addition consisting of
8 single family lots.
45. Two model home permits were approved for the Kings Wood 2nd Addition.
46. Authorization was given to 1) the rezoning of 2.54 acres from A to R-1,
and 2) a preliminary plat of 19.54 acres called the Woodlands 3rd Addition
containing 37 lots.
47.
Authorization was given to the changes to Chapter 5 of the City Code which
would include allowing off -sale liquor stores to be open on January 1 and
July 4.
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
Lase
48.
A request by Tri -Land Companies that the City not require payment of the
Sewer and water assessment charges in the amount of $1,315 for trunk water
and trunk sewer one unit connection until the commercial property is
platted and developed in the future was denied.
49.
The first amendment to the development contract between Cray Research Inc.
and the City of Eagan for Cray Addition was approved.
50.
The Council endorsed Liz Witt, representing the Mendota Heights City
Council, for an RIB appointment.
51.
The Declaration of Covenants for The Waters (Lone Oak Addition) pertaining
to landscaping, landscape lighting and street lighting was approved.
56. Preparation of a feasibility report for storm sewer improvements identified
as Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -storm sewer) was approved.
57. Payment #5 to Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition -storm sewer) was
approved.
.!� 58. All bills were approved and ordered paid.
52.
The extension of the variance for working hours
for grading permit EX18-
'
189 (Seneca WWTP.) through July 29, 1989 was approved.
53.
The petition to vacate a portion of the Fairway
Hills frontage road was
received and a public hearing was scheduled for
July 18, 1989.
54.
A petition for Project 577 (Austin Road streets
6 services) was accepted
and a feasibility report was authorized.
55.
A request for extended hours of operation on the
Pilot Knob Road Project
was denied.
56. Preparation of a feasibility report for storm sewer improvements identified
as Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -storm sewer) was approved.
57. Payment #5 to Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition -storm sewer) was
approved.
.!� 58. All bills were approved and ordered paid.
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
JUNE 20, 1989
1
Country 66
11
Finaserve, Inc.
3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
3150 Dodd Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Eagan, MN 55121
2
Total Petroleum
9
Cedar Cliff Amoco
4206 Nicols Rd
4600 Slater Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
10
Total Petroleum
12
Holiday Plus #234
2000 Rahncliff Court
4295 Nicols Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan;MN 55122
3
Superamerica #4049
14
Brooks Superette
Diffley a Sibley Mem. Hwy.
3390 Coachman Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55121
4
Superamerica #4182
15
Texaco Super Store
1406 Yankee Doodle Rd
1579 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
13
Superamerica #4335
1379 Town Centre Dr
Eagan, MN 55123
5
Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
6 Eagan E - 2 Stop
4195 Nicols Rd.
Eagan, MN 55122
7 Sinclair Station
394.6 Cedar Ave.
Eagan, MN 55122
8 Eagan Standard
4205 Nicols Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
\0i
License period:
July 1, 1989 -June 30,1990
1989 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
VENDOR LOCATION
Advance Carter Co. 4 machines
American Amusement Arcades LaFonda's
850 Decatur Ave. North 3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
Minneapolis, MN 55427 3 machines
J. Doolittles
2140 Cliff Road
2 machines
3 machines
Richard's Food 6 Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
Schmidt Enterprises 1 machine
3600 West Shakopee Rd. Italian Pie Shoppe
Bloomington, MN 55431 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
Gary Starks over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121 3125 Dodd Road
Fred Sande
1561 Scheffer
St. Paul, MN 55116
Theisen Vending
3804 Nicollet Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55409
Brookside Vending
9845 Brookside Ave.
Bloomington, MN 55431
2 machines
Eagan Steak
1448 Yankee
House
Doodle Road
3 machines
Eagan Tennis i Athletic Club
3330 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Al Bakers
3434 Washington Drive
1 machine
Dougherty's
1312 Town Centre Drive
Broadway Pizza
2113 Cliff Road
1 machine
Pizza Hut
1 machine
1325 Town Centre Dr and 3992 Sibley Hwy
Davanni's
8 machines
1980 Cliff Road
Eagan Tap
3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
D.V.M. Company
over 15 machines
119 State
Cedarvale Lanes
St. Paul, MN 55107
3883 Beau d'Rue Drive
3 machines
Valley Lounge
3385 Sibley Memorial Hwy
3 machines
Richard's Food 6 Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
Schmidt Enterprises 1 machine
3600 West Shakopee Rd. Italian Pie Shoppe
Bloomington, MN 55431 1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
Gary Starks over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121 3125 Dodd Road
Fred Sande
1561 Scheffer
St. Paul, MN 55116
Theisen Vending
3804 Nicollet Ave.
Minneapolis, MN 55409
Brookside Vending
9845 Brookside Ave.
Bloomington, MN 55431
2 machines
Eagan Steak
1448 Yankee
House
Doodle Road
3 machines
Eagan Tennis i Athletic Club
3330 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Al Bakers
3434 Washington Drive
1 machine
Dougherty's
1312 Town Centre Drive
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
There are twenty-seven (27) items on the agenda referred to as
Consent Items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council wishes to discuss any of the itmes in further detail,
those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed
under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief.
A. PERSONNEL, ITEMS
Item 1. Engineering Tech — This item is informational; no
Council action is required. At the June 6, 1989 City Council
meeting„ approval was given to hire an Engineering Tech without
an actual candidate being named. This was due to the fact that
references were being checked and one interview was yet to be
held. The person to be hired was to be named later and was to
receive the approval of the City Administrator before a job offer
was made. For the Council's information, the person offered the
position and approved for hire as Engineering Tech is Lane
Wegener.
Item 2. Seasonal Street Maintenance Worker -- This item is
informational; no Council action is required. The City received
the resignation of a .seasonal street maintenance worker. In
order to fill this temporary position in a timely manner, the
City Administrator approved the hiring of John Carlson.
NO ACTION IS REQUIRED ON THE ABOVE ITEMS.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
DECLARE SURPLUS PROPERTY/CHEVROLET CORVETTE
B. Declare Surplus Property, Abandon Property 1977 Chevrolet
Corvette --A 1977 Chevrolet Corvette was confiscated by the Police
Department approximately 2'k years ago and is no longer needed as
evidence and, therefore, should be declared as surplus property.
The car was kept in cold storage in the. Old Town Hall building and
unfortunately, mice have destroyed the electrical system and some
of the upholstery. Despite its condition, the City will advertise
in several area newspapers to attract the highest bid.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize a 1977
Chevrolet Corvette as surplus property.
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
C. License Renewals for Service Station Permits --There are
fifteen (15) service station renewals in order for consideration
for the license period which is July 1, 1989 to June 30, 1990.
Changes in service station permit renewals include Gateway Foods,
who purchased Brooks Superette and Crown Coco, who purchased Eagan
Service Center Union 76. Also, one new service station was built,
the Texaco Super Store at 1579 Cliff Road.
Enclosed on page In is a_ copy of the service station permit
renewals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve service station
permit renewals for fifteen (15) service stations.
000
5
SERVICE STATION PERMITS
JUNE 20, 1989
1
Country 66
11
Finaserve, Inc.
3206 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
3150 Dodd Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Eagan, MN 55121
2
Total Petroleum
9
Cedar Cliff Amoco
4206 Nicols Rd
4600 Slater Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
10
Total Petroleum
12
Holiday Plus #'294
2000 Rahncliff Court
4295 Nicols Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
3
Superamerica #4049
14
Brooks Superette
Diffley & Sibley Mem. Hwy.
3390 Coachman Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55121
4
Superamerica #4182
15
Texaco Super Store
1406 Yankee Doodle Rd
1579 Cliff Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Eagan, MN 55122
13 Superamerica #4335
1379 Town Centre Dr
Eagan, MN 55123
5 Yankee Square Standard
1424 Yankee Doodle Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
6 Eagan E - Z Stop
4195 Nicols Rd.
Eagan, MN 55122
7 Sinclair Station
3946 Cedar Ave.
Eagan, MN 55122
8 Eagan Standard
4205 Nicols Rd
Eagan, MN 55122
I
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
TRAILER PERMITS
D. License Renewals for Trailer Permits --The City code allows for
trailer permits under certain conditions within the City. During
the past several years, the number of trailers have steadily
decreased. There are currently six (6) remaining throughout the
community. Refer to page _j9L for a list of the trailer permit
renewals. Administrative Intern Walden has physically inspected
each of the trailers and researched minutes to verify the length
of time and any other conditions relative to the granting of these
six (6) trailer permits. For a copy of that information, refer to
page �.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve those trailer
permit renewals that are in order for consideration.
TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
1. Tripp Oil Co.
3085 Hwy 13
Eagan, MN 55121
2. Earl Marotzke
535 Gun Club Road
Rosemount 55068
June 20, 1989
Permitted prior to 1970 and
remains in office use.
permitted prior to 1970 and
remains in use as a family home.
3. Alwin d Lyle Schultz permitted prior to 1970 and
1315 Carriage Hills Drive remains in use as a family home.
Eagan, MN 55123
4. Edmund Schwann permitted in 1980 and remains in
810 Yankee Doodle Rd use as a residence for Mr. Schwanz
Eagan, MN 55123 mother.
5. Dakota Homes permitted in 1,972 and remains in use
3660 Dodd Road as a sales office for mobile homes.
Eagan, MN 55121
6,. Jim Horne permitted in 1984 and serves as
3850 Coronation Drive storage for Mr. Horne's Historic
Eagan, MN 55122 Aviation business.
E
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JEFF WELDON, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN
DATE: JUNE 14, 1989
SUBJECT: TRAILER PERMIT RENEWALS
On June 13, I conducted site inspections of the six trailers in
Eagan that are subject to permit renewal. I found all six of the
units still present and our permit records show them as follows:
Tripp Oil Co.
3085 Hwy 13
(office use)
Lyle Schultz
1315 Carriage Hills
(residence use)
American Homes
3660 Dodd Rd.
(sales office)
Earl Maratyke
535 Gun Club Road
(residence use)
Edmund.Schwanz
Dr. 810 Yankee Doodle Rd.
(residence use)
Jim Horne
3850 Coronation Dr..
(storage)
I also conducted a file -inspection of each permit and found that
none of them contain sunset clauses or conditional stipulations
that would be cause for not renewing the permit.
Dakota Homes is now doing business as American Homes either as a
result of the sale of the business or a simple change of business
name. There is nothing in their permit that alters the status of
using a trailer because of a change in business name.
Jeff Weldon
Administrat ve atern
JW/vmd`
cc: Liz Witt, Deputy Clerk
9
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
LICENSE RENEWALS/AMUSEMENT DEVISES
E. License Renewals for Amusement Devises --City code regulations
require the licensing of all amusement devises. A license period
of July through June is part of the regulations. Enclosed on page
is a list of those amusement devises that are in order for
renewal.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM:. To approve the amusement
devise renewals for 1989.
0
License period:
July 1, 1989 -June 30,1990
1989 AMUSEMENT DEVICE RENEWALS
VENDOR
LOCATION
Advance Carter Co.
4 machines
American Amusement Arcades
LaFonda's
850 Decatur 'Ave. North
3665 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
Minneapolis, MN 55427
3 machines
J. Doolittles
2140 Cliff Road
2 machines
Broadway Pizza
2113 Cliff Road
1 machine
Pizza Hut
1 machine
1325 Town Centre Dr and 3992 Sibley Hwy
Davanni's
8 machines
1980 Cliff Road
Eagan Tap
3998 Sibley Memorial Hwy.
D.V.M. Company
over 15 machines
119 State
Cedarvale Lanes
St. Paul, MN 55107
3883 Beau d'Rue Drive
3 machines
Valley Lounge
3385 Sibley Memorial Hwy
3 machines
Richard's Food 8 Liquor
4185 S. Robert Trail
Schmidt Enterprises
1 machine
3600 West Shakopee Rd.
Italian Pie Shoppe
Bloomington, MN 55431
1438 Yankee Doodle Rd
Gary Starks
over 15 machines
3125 Dodd Road
Starks Saloon
Eagan, MN 55121
3125 Dodd Road
Fred Sande,
2 machines
1561 Scheffer
Eagan Steak House
St. Paul, MN 55116
1448 Yankee Doodle Road
Theisen Vending 3 machines
3804 Nicollet Ave. Eagan Tennis 8 Athletic Club
Minneapolis, MN 55409 3330 Pilot Knob Road
2 machines
Al Bakers
3434 Washington Drive
Brookside Vending 1 machine
9845 Brookside Ave. Dougherty's
Bloomington, MN 55431 1312 Town Centre Drive
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
PARADE PERMITS/EAGAN FOURTH OF JULY
F. Parade Permit, Application for Donald Clark/Eagan Fourth of
July Association --Mr. Don Clark, representing the Eagan Fourth of
July Association, is requesting a parade permit according to City
ordinance regulations for the Fourth of July festivit e,¢ For a
copy of the parade permit application, refer to page.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a parade permit
for the Fourth of July Association for the annual parade that is
included as a part of the Fourth of July Festivities.
I
Permit fee x$25.00
�_. i2�;e�9v�z9
Date: CITY OF EAGAN
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD
EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122
PARADE PERMIT APPLICATION
I, L' 1.++-k— lbn. _00w04444 5---, hereby make
NAME Last First Middle
application for a Parade Permit for 7-4-87 from
date
the City of Eagan. The sponsoring organization is:
NaM of Organization Street Address
E',.,t. M) MT -1 Telephone (GILD VS -Y -10 M7
Cit State Zip
Describe
.the route, the length, estimated
time of commencement
and term-
ination
and the general composition of the
parade:
�� n:_,v-�•
w,.tl S�_n"{ ik '� t(�
n I
C:, Zu,f�:L �'i 1�-L-�
s' �L �/
,t( S l Al /C AF V'- d l.,.0 �V.. kP�ac�c:A'+� •lel l/;3c
Authorized. Signature:
e Las
The Chief of Police will review the parade route, examining possible
hazardous or inconvenient conditions. He shall make arrangements for
alternate routing of traffic and any other traffic control measures.
His findings will be presented to the City Council. The Council may
deny or grant the permit, and/or add conditions including a date,time
or route.
For City Use Only:
Police Approval: Yes No
signed date
City Council Approval: Yes ( ) No ( )
signeda- to
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
MASSAGE THERAPY LICENSE/TODAY'S CONCEPT OF EAGAN
G. Application, Massage Therapy Establishment License and Massage
Therapist License for Today's Concept of Eagan --License
applications were received for both an establishment and massage
therapist for business to be located at 2105 Cliff Road. The
president is Kathleen Maurer, the vice president is Elizabeth
Gangl, both are applying for massage therapist licenses. Robin
Oxborough is applying for a massage therapist license and she will
be employed by Today's Concept.
The Police Department has conducted the investigation and find no
reason to deny the establishment or therapist license applications
as presented.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a massage
therapy establishment license in the name of Today's Concept of
Eagan and a massage therapist license for Kathleen Maurer,
Elizabeth Gangl and Robin Oxborough.
SELECTION/SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS CONSULTANT
H. Selection of Space Needs Analysis Consultant --A space needs
study for the Municipal Center Building to include law enforcement
and fire administration was authorized for 1989. The RFP,
prescreening and final interviews have all been completed for
selection of an architectural firm that would conduct the space
needs analysis. For further information on this item, refer to the
staff memo enclosed on page(s) /S'4+16
If any member of the City Council would like a copy of either the
initial SOQ that requested submittals of interest by qualified
architectural firms or the final request for proposal in which more
detailed information was requested, please feel free to contact
this office at any time.
As stated in the attached memo, a recommendation for selection of.
a firm will be forthcoming with the administrative agenda packet
on Monday, June 19.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To,authorize selection of
an architectural firm to prepare a space needs—analysis for the
municipal center, law enforcement and fire administration needs.
14
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR HOHENSTEIN
DATE: JUNE 14p 1989
SUBJECT: SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS SELECTION
Please raise for Council consideration the matter of selection of
a consultant for the City's Space Needs Analysis. As you will
recall, this item was budgeted for 1989 to permit the City to take
a comprehensive look at its current facilities and the potential
for remodeling or expansion to meet future needs in anticipation
of the City's continued growth.
The general scope of the work will be to consider the police and
administrative functions in the Municipal Center in the context of
the municipal property at Pilot Knob and Wescott Roads. The
consultant is to consider a no -build option, remodeling and
expansion, and a completely new structure for one or more City
functions. While the new structure is not considered a preferred
alternative, the study was designed to permit the consultant
flexibility to suggest alternatives in the event that the future
of all City functions could not be feasibly located at the present
site. All prospective consultants have been informed, however,
that the City has a bias toward this site and would prefer
alternatives which centralized functions here.
The City advertised for interested firms and distributed a request
for Statements of Qualification (SOQ) to thirty-one firms.
Fourteen responded with an SOQ. The statements were reviewed by
a selection committee consisting of Police Chief Geagan, Parks &
Recreation Director Vraa, Chief Building Official Reid and
Assistant Chief Building Official Hanson on behalf of Community
Development and City Administrator Hedges and Assistant to the City
Administrator Hohenstein on behalf of Administration. From the
field of fourteen, five finalists were chosen to submit proposals
through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Those were received
and have been reviewed by the selection committee. Interviews of
the five firms will be held on Friday, June 16, 1989. Those firms
are:
The Alliance
BRW Architects, Inc.
Thorbeck & Lambert Architects Ltd.
Vanney Associates Inc.
Winsor/Faricy Architects
The firms will be reviewed on the responsiveness of the proposals
to the RFP, their understanding of the scope of work, the price
submitted on the proposal and previous city experience and
references for the firms. Due to the lateness of the Friday
interviews, a recommendation by the selection committee will be
forwarded to the Council as additional information on Monday, June
19. If you have any questions concerning this memorandum or the
selection process, please let me know.
Assi ant to the City Administrator
JH/vmd
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CITY CODE AMENDMENT/DOG AND CAT REGULATIONS
1. City Code Amendment to Chapter 10 Regarding. Dog and Cat
Regulation and Dog Licensing --At the June 6 City Council meeting
a City Code amendment to Chapter 10 regarding the inoculation of
dogs and cats and other minor changes to the existing City Code
regulations was given consideration. There were several
suggestions raised by the City Council regarding the proposed
amendment and direction was given to continue this item to the June
20 meeting. Both the Director of Finance and Chief of Police have
reviewed the ordinance and taken into consideration the Council
direction. For a copy of their findings andre ommendations along
with the revised ordinance, refer to pages 16 through _ / .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the City Code
amendment to Chapter 10 regarding dog and cat regulation and dog
licensing as revised.
MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBERE
DATE: JUNE 15, 1989
SUBJECT: CITY CODE AMENDMENT -DOG AND CAT REGULATIONS
Attached please find a proposed amendment to Chapter 10 of the City
Code. The revised copy has some minor changes from the ordinance
originally prepared on June 6, 1959. The intent of the ordinance
is first to allow the City to take specific action in cases where
dogs and cats are disturbing the peace and secondly to clearly list
the lack of a kennel permit where required as an unlawful act.
These two items are handled with the addition of the last sentences
in Subd. 10 and Subd. 13 of Section 10.11. The intent is also to
require rabies inoculation for cats and to allow the City to take
specific, clearly identified action in the case of animal bites.
These two items are A and B of Subd. 14 of Section 10.11.
Subdivision 13 is also modified slightly to remove any reference
to a license being required for cats. I believe that has always
been the intent, however, this subdivision was not properly
written.
It should be noted that without a cat licensing requirement, there
will probably be less incentive to inoculate cats against rabies.
The City's enforcement and utilization of that specific provision
will be primarily in dealing with cats being at large and/or in the
case of cat bites.
Additionally, staff was directed to consider two other changes to
dog licensing. The first was to issue tags when the application
for a license was made and the second was a different license, year
(May 1 from February 1) to allow for a consolidation of the rabies
trip and heart worm test trip. Both of these changes are certainly
feasible and could be implemented if desired by the City Council.
In my opinion both would have an adverse impact on the City's
rabies clinic, however. Tags are currently issued with the
completed application in all cases except at the clinic. It is not
done there so the process can move along as fast as possible. The
cost of additional staff if the objective of fast service is
important will probably exceed the current extra postage cost of
the subsequent mailing. To actually conduct the heart worm test
at the clinic will also require more time and staff. That
particular staff would have to be provided by the veterinarians.
We checked only with Dr. Hansen at the Eagan Pet Clinic who was not
particularly supportive of the change. If this concept is to be
pursued, additional research will be required.
Please let me know if any additional information is required.
U. V
Finance irector/City Clerk
ETV/vmd
Attachment
cc: Chief of Police Geagan
JUN 15 189 14:46 MRS 120 P02
ORDINANCE N0. 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAG'AN CITY
CODE CHAPTER 10 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY
AMENDING SECTION 30.11 REGARDING DOG AND CAT REGULATION AND DOG
LICENSING AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND
SECTION 10.99.
The City Council of the City of Eagan does, ordains
Section 1. Eagan City Code Section 10.11, Subd. 10 is hereby amended
to reads
Subd. 10. Disturbing the Peace.
it is unlawful for any person, as owner or possessor of a dog or
cat, to suffer or permit such dog or cat to disturb the peace and
quiet of the neighborhood by barking, howling, whining, or making any
other loud or unusual noise. Tr a dog Sr cat is disturbing the ,teace
for two or more hours, an ayAmal Qon rol officer, pglaco off icer or
community rgrvice officer may remove the animal and place it in the
aCitty,mand at the owner's eg- ns .
Section 2. Eagan City Code Section 10.11, Subd. 13 is hereby amended
to read
Subd. 13. Other Unlawful Acts.
It is unlawful for the owner Jju (1) fail to have the jlQg
license tag issued by the City firmly attached to a collar worn at
all times by the licensed A", or (2) own or keep a dog or cat which
is dangerous (any such animal which has caused injury to persons or
property shall be deemed °dangerous"), or (3) interfere with any
police officer, or other City employee, in the performance of his
duty to enforce this Section, or (4) fail to keep his dog from
barking, howling or whining, or his cat from emitting loud or unusual
noise, or (5) fail to prevent his dog or cat from defecating in or
upon public property or the premises of another, or (6) permit solid
waste of a dog or cat to accumulate on his premises for more than
twenty-four hours. (Z) Keep or own four or more dogs or cats. or
Section 3. Eagan City Code Section 10.11 is hereby amended by adding
a new subdivision to read:
126 P63
JUN 15 189 14:46 MAS
Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions
Section 4. Eagan City Code Including
Definitions Applicable to the Entire City titledeated
Violation' and
isectionn their ICS entiretynby reference 8asothoughsrepeanot"
hereby ado;ted
verbatim. This
EeDate. ordingdto 188@ shall take effect upon
Section 5•ffect
adoption and publication
AN
ATTEST:
By: E, 3, Vanoverbeke
Its: Clerk
Date ordinance Adopted,
CITY OF, EAG
City Council
Ey, Victor L. Ellison
its: Mayor
Date ordinance published in the Legal Newspaper:
a 1 -2-
and
for
are
its
Agenda Information Memo
June 26, 1989 City Council Meeting
WAIVER OF PLAT/B. H. GRACE CORPORATION
J. Waiver of Plat, B. H. Grace Corporation, Lot 1, Block 6,
Vienna Woods, Duplex Lot Split to Allow Individual Ownership --The
City received an application from B. H. Grace Corporation
requesting a waiver of plat for Lot 1, Block 6, Vienna Woods to
allow separate ownership of,a duplex unit.
For additional info tion on this tem, refer to staff report
included on pages 6U through ?_.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a waiver of plat
for B. H. Grace Corporation, Lot 1, Block 6, Vienna Woods for a
duplex lot split to allow individual ownership.
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF PLAT# DUPLEX LOT SPLIT
APPLICANT: B.H. GRACE CORPORATION
LOCATION: LOT 1� BLOCK 6p VIENNA WOODS ADDITION
EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 20� 1989
DATE OF REPORT: JUNE 9l 1989
REPORTED BY: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted by B.H.
Grace Corporation requesting a Waiver Of Plat for Lot 1, Block 6,
Vienna Woods. The duplex currently under construction meets all
setback requirements and has separate utilities. Approving the
Waiver would allow individual ownership.
If approved, this Waiver shall be subject to all applicable Code
requirements.
Srrrwci�ar�� G'cr��f�criie
SURVEY FOR: R.H.Grace
DESCRIBED AS• Lot 1, Rlock 6, VIENNA MUDS, City or P.agm,,,lt,kota (hlmty,
Nilmcsota and reserving easements of record.
Parcel Ae That part of Lot Ir Block 6, Vienna Woods, according to the record plat
thereof, Dakota Canty Minnesota, lying test of a line drawl front a point on the north
line of said Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet west of the northeast comer thereof to a point on
the south line of sa
id Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet west of saltheast comer thereof..
Parcel B: That part of Lot 1, Block b, Vienna Woods, according to the record plat
thereof, Dakota Canty Minnesota, lying east of a line drawl front a point on the north
line of said 'Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet West of the northeast comer the, 4 to a point on
the so.lth line of said Lot 1, distant 50.00 feet west of the south•lst corner thereof.
VIENNA LANE
111.0 1410 94C 144.1
N
E
PROP ➢ CLETAT10C
et of toOn lrllen
• /q.0
Nqr rr
Re
• Ia:1
19o,
00, oc
11 100. 00
• /!A
ne, Aar •.mien [lar.
e so.00
Pyr
f
ge.eElnell:1.
SO.00
Enhtlnf Eleetlnnr
t3sl-----Ij--
rd
1
�
—a�
\\
O
I e
,
24.2
t75� MOO
..--
°L 0
eW1E
10.
6
JIWeE
18-00
1 IL 00 ji
.00
Imo°
10!00 a
a
q�
o
o
W 8
11
0
1EIn- }(
u /T
N
t,r
ENT"
i 50
0
°J
to 34.000
]400
It go
i z
li
O.0
PARCEL A
I
PARCEL 8 I 1
I
I
4D
sL--=----
-------�
SO.00
51.77
—
et of toOn lrllen
• /q.0
Nqr rr
Re
• Ia:1
Ouunt Fneear
•IRI
Ienrernt Flrt
• /!A
ne, Aar •.mien [lar.
-
Pyr
f
ge.eElnell:1.
0.0
Enhtlnf Eleetlnnr
0reingr 0lrnd len
Marin 0fhnt 111b
O
HEDLU D
Planning Enpinaarfng Sueging
waw raw ri.. • nrwnrs
r•r�iow�ui'
N90' 00'00' E 101.77
9
Jam_
N Iq anyIM. 1 I. L
OMrr N Tlewl
1 Lew EIaA Ill X10.0/ i
alit IE,YCI IEO11111"t
Front • 10 btu EIA • 10
SCALE: 1 INCH • 30 FEET Iher • 1/ wen ilia • 10
E Mra/T Willy IN01 Oft or"'. Nen a re•arl wee NNwOa ti rw JOB No.:
0r "W-1 ry alter N .hlw M 001 1 692- 118
Un/ aowwTff Mee We le•e of M ONE N Ylwu/10.
R-' la /C 7
cA/n ."%
OWGR^CM
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
AMENDMENTS/1989 WASTE ABATEMENT/RECYCLING FUNDI_NG APPLICATION
R. Amendments, to the 1989 Waste Abatement/Recycling Funding
Application --The Community Landfill Abatement Funding Program
administered by Dakota County has made available funds for
recycling program operations., administrative and capital
expenditures. Staff is recommending that the City Council
authorize amendments to the Dakota County 1989 funding application
to include 1) use of capital funds for the purchase of waste
abatement equipment. A stump grinder to be used by the Parks &
Recreation Department is deemed necessary and cost effective, 2)
the City has budgeted sufficient funds for the abatement goal set
at 9% and is capable of meeting its funding needs when this goal
is reached. The funds requested in the amendment are to be used
for payments to the haulers if our goals are exceeded. With the
rise in the City's population and a strong recycling participation,
staff feels the additional funding will prove necessary.
For City Council information, the capital revenue was allocated
over a three (3) year period and the City'samendment will use
available funds granted for 1989 through 1991. The capital
assistance portion of the funding was set over a three (3) year
period to allow for the flexibility to offset any additional
operating expenditures. There are no additional City funds
required for these budget amendments.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize an amendment
to the Community Landfill Abatement Funding.Program to include 1)
a stump grinder as a capital acquisition for the Parks & Recreation
Department and 2) additional funds for the abatement goal set at
9% to be used for payments to haulers if the City's goals are
exceeded.
aS
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CONT. 89-14 RECEIVE BIDS/.AWARD CONT.
1WTR. TREATMENT PLANT-DEHUM.-)
L. Contract 89-14, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Water Treatment
Plant - Dehumidification) --At 11:00 a.m. on June 19, 1989, formal
bids will be received for the installation of a dehumidification
system for the Coachman Road Water Treatment Facility. The
tabulation of bids received will be included in the Additional
Information packet on Monday. This project was rebid when the
first advertisement resulted in no formal bids being submitted.
Of those bids submitted this time, an evaluation will be made for
conformance to the City approved specifications and any deviations
will be addressed at the Council meeting on June 20th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 89-14 (Water Treatment Plan - Dehumidification) and award
the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
M. Project 575, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report
(James Court- Streetlights): --The City has received,a Petition from
seven property owners on James Court requesting the preparation of
a feasibility report for the installation of streetlights to
service the Slaters Acres Addition.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition for
Project '575 (James Court - Streetlights) and authorize the
preparation of a feasibility report. ,
dal
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
PROJ. 570, RECEIVE PEAS. RPT/ORDER PUBLIC
HEARING (CLIFF RDG. ADD. -STORM SEWER)
N. Project 570, Receive Feasibility Report/Order Public Hearing
(Cliff Ridge Addition - Storm Sewer) --In response to a petition
submitted by the Developer of this proposed subdivision, the
Council authorized preparation of a feasibility report which has
now been completed and is being presented to the Council for their
information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to
formally discuss the merits of this project.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the feasibility
report for Project 570 (Cliff Ridge Addition -Storm Sewer) and
authorize the public hearing to be held on July 18, 1989.
CONT. 89-09, APP. PLANB/ADTHORIZE AD FOR BIDS
(JOHNNY CARE RIDGE ROAD EXTENSION)
O. Contract 89-09, Approve Plans/Authorise Ad for Bids (Johnny
Cake Ridge Road Extension) --As a result of the public hearing held
on June 21, 1988, the Council authorized the preparation df
detailed plans and specifications for the installation of Johnny
Cake Ridge Road to its connection with Diffley Road along with the
installation of sidewalks and trailways to Cliff Road. These plans
have now been completed and are being presented to the City Council
for review and consideration of authorizing the advertisement for
bid solicitations. The consulting engineer and/or Public Works
Director will be available to discuss any specific aspect of this
project as may be necessary.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
specifications for Contract 89-09 (Johnny Cake
extension) and authorize the advertisement for bid
held at 10:00 a.m., Friday, July 14, 1989.
Im.
the plans and
Ridge Road
opening to be
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
VEH. #219/REC. BIDS/AUTHORIZE PURCHASE
(SEWER VAC -ALL)
P. Vehicle #219, Receive Bids/Authorize Purchase (Sewer Vac -All)-
-At 10:30 a.m. on June 15, 1989, the City received bids for the
purchase of a Sewer Vac -All vehicle for the Utility Maintenance
Division of the Public Works Department in accordance with the
approved 1989 Budget. Enclosed on page 30 is a tabulation of
the bids received for this piece of equipment. All bids will be
reviewed for the their accuracy and compliance with specifications
and any deviations will be verbally presented at the meeting on
June 20th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
vehicle #219 and authorize the purchase from the lowest responsible
bidder.
aCl
BID DATE - June 15, 1989
BID TIME - 10:30 a.m.
BID OPENING
SEWER VAC CATCH BASIN CLEANER
F0c
AMOUNT BID
OPTION 1 OPTION 2
1. Bovum Eaupiment $109.,999.00 $115,528.00
2. Ruffridge-Johnson Eqpt. Co. $103,898..00 $100,898.00
3._ MacQueen Eouipment $103,801.00
Budgeted Amount - $65,000.00
Agency Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CONT. 88-17, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONT.
(CEDARVALE BLVD. -OVERLAY)
Q. Contract 88-17, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Cedarvale
Boulevard - Overlay) --At 10:30 a.m. on June 14, 1989, formal bids
were received for the construction of an overlay on Cedarvale
Boulevard (Old Trunk Highway 13) from Nicols Road through
Silverbell Road to its intersection with Trunk Highway 13.
Enclosed on page ':VX is a tabulation of the bids received with
a comparison of the low bid to the engineer's estimate contained
in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held
on March 7, 1989. All bids will be checked for their accuracy and
compliance with the bid specifications and any deviations will be
verbally presented at the meeting on Jun 20th.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Boulevard' -Overlay) and award the contract
to the lowest responsible bidder..
3l
STREET OVERLAY AND APPURTENANT WORK
PROJECT NO. 546, CONTRACT NO. 88-17
B.A.P. 195-122-03 MTB
CEDARVALE BOULEVARD
B.A.P. 195-108-03
SILVER BELL ROAD
FOR THE CITY OF EAGAN
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
CONTRACTORS
1. Midwest Asphalt
2. Bituminous Roadways
3. Valley Paving, Inc.
4. McNamara Contracting
5. Alexander Construction
LOW BID
Feasibility Report Estimate
Engineer's Estimate
$ Over (+) Under (-) F.R.
$ Over (+) Under (-) E.E.
BID TIME: 11:30 A.M.
BID DATE: TUES., JUNE 14, 1989
TOTAL BASE BID ALTERNATE BID
$ 281,235.80 $ 23,700.00
287,599.35 22,278.00
288,489.60 18,960.00
290,988.70 23,.700.00
292,494.08 21,330.00
$ 281,235.80
$'267,000.00
304,000.00 23,700.00
+ 5.3%
3a
7.5$ -0-
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
PROJ. 574, REC. PET/AUTH FEAR. RPT
(EAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PR -STREETLIGHTS)
R. Project 574, Receive Petition/Authorize Feasibility Report
(Eagandale Industrial Park - StreetligLts)--The staff has received
a petition from Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company and the
Opus Corporation requesting the installation of several
streetlights within the Eagandale Industrial Park. With the
Petition, a map was submitted showing specific locations for the
requested streetlights. While several of the locations correspond
with the City's standard for intersection lighting, other locations
were for driveway entrances to specific businesses. Yet, other
locations required for City in rsection streetlighting were not
included. Enclosed on page .3 is a map showing the location of
the various types of streetlights associated with this specific
Petition. The Public Works Director would like to briefly discuss
this Petition in further detail to receive specific direction from
the City Council necessary to prepare the requested feasibility
report.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the Petition for
Project 574 (Eagandale Industrial Park - Streetlights) and
authorize the preparation of a feasibility report.
IL
I
1
494
mf-wr%#+ elm
CGR TE c ®ROADI cy�C q�HM
TER CURVE I ®, F
AVALON AVE. 4C _ _ - ---
HI IV i KENNETH Imo— 44G�
ti F
Q Q Q in
co COU Y M£ �'
��4
RX BEATRICE
N�
UAa
Mc KEE
L 9� EAGANQAq=Er PARI
CT� 4r ZI ST.
ozll1
E Q ' �p WIC ® EXISTING STREET LIGHT
NI
® PROPOSED PRIVATE
ENTRANCE LIGHT
0 LONE OAR ROAIJ
Q PROPOSED INTERSECTION LIGHT
RECONNENDED INTERSECTION
W !n LIGHT
�� 0- _j
NMI[Mill
IL
I
1
494
mf-wr%#+ elm
CGR TE c ®ROADI cy�C q�HM
TER CURVE I ®, F
AVALON AVE. 4C _ _ - ---
HI IV i KENNETH Imo— 44G�
ti F
Q Q Q in
co COU Y M£ �'
��4
RX BEATRICE
N�
UAa
Mc KEE
L 9� EAGANQAq=Er PARI
CT� 4r ZI ST.
ozll1
E Q ' �p WIC ® EXISTING STREET LIGHT
NI
® PROPOSED PRIVATE
ENTRANCE LIGHT
0 LONE OAR ROAIJ
Q PROPOSED INTERSECTION LIGHT
RECONNENDED INTERSECTION
W !n LIGHT
�� 0- _j
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
GAMBLING LICENSE/FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION
S. Gambling License,, Firefighters Relief Association for Fire
Prevention --The Firefighters Relief Association has made
application for a gambling license to be used during the Fourth of
July celebration with all proceeds dedicated toward fire
prevention.
It will be necessary for the City Council to waive the 30 day
review requirement with the State Gambling Board.
The application is in order for consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a
temporary gambling license to be used for pull tabs by the
Firefighters Relief Association during the July 4th celebration.
SPECIAL NOTE: The Firefighters Relief Association has decided not
to pursue a gambling license at this time and this item has been
withdrawn,
CARNIVAL PUBLIC BROW/JULY FOURTH CELEBRATION
T. Show License, for a Carnival and Public Show, Eagan Lions
Fourth of July Celebration --The Eagan Lions Club has made
application for a show license for the purpose of a carnival and
public show during the Fourth of July celebration at Rahn Park.
The application is in order according to City ordinance regulation.
For /-additional information, refer to a copy of the license on page
_I -
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON TRIS ITEM: To approve a show license
for a carnival and public show to the Eagan Lions Club for the
Fourth of July celebration.
35
351).00 Invescigation fee" Dace:
Q.2500 5250_ License fee
CITY OF EAGAN
APPLICATION FOR SHOWS LICENSE
]Shows: public show, movie,, caravan,
circus, carnival,exhibition,
theater]
I, h'Gt-3,,A1 -%, / (1,,VTOh/ , hereby make application for a
name
license from the City of Eagan , which
yT� oC ou
will take place on during the hours ofU.
1 �� i) hours
at �-�: '' � r(� %�/1. ? fi' ( /k.�i1. rL� The purpose of the event is
I— i7��CtiOn of show ,
LZ
I represent l`jI i
Names and addresses of corporation officers:
12 a:L, l_ L
p n e �J
lG : i JJ 9 J`S
hos (-:-:,L4 ;v A'E Y' I�Llg: 7 -1r -'z'7 -1r -'z' i;.f'
Person in charge
of event:
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: CITY OF EAGAN. Licenses are issued for a
specific period and will be issued to qualified individuals or firms
only. Failure to provide true and .correct information shall consti-
tute a violation of the ordinance in question and in addition to
penalties, the license of any applicant may be revoked.
Police Approval Date Cicy er pprovaa�
5.88
3(a
F�
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
LICENSE/NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR FOR SAGAN LIONS
4TH OF JULY CELEBRATION
U. License (temporary) for Non-Intoaiaating Halt Liquor, Eagan
Lions Fourth of July Celebration --An application for a non -
intoxicating malt liquor license was presented to the City by the
Eagan Lions Club for June 30 to July 5 for the July 4th celebration
event at Rahn Park.
For a copy of the malt liquor license, refer to page :5,f .
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a non -
intoxicating malt liquor license for the Eagan Lions Club for the
Fourth of July celebration festivities from June 30 to July 5.
3-7
DATE
CITY OF EACAN
NEW
ON SALE FEE
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD
RENEWAL -T —
OFF SALE FEE
EAGAN, FLINNESOTA 55122
TEMPORARY _
TEWORARY FEE $25.00
APPLICATION FOR NON -INTOXICATING MALT LIWOR
LICENSE
PLEASE PRINT
N(,R
,,d
Last
First
Middle Last
First
AJJress , X11• I .
l t 11 \i Cir\if
. �J-),ti F Address
!Nie
Stre.c
Street
I.I 1O,110
%)Vti
r>J/ old.C,cy
State
Zip City
Scace p
Phone�JI--`,I If
Birthdate r,
i /(1 Phone
BLrthdate
nr,l ,r.•� First Muddle
tdJress ' - J'I ' Il)i_ J Address
Street Street
City State Zip City State Zip
Phone 339 Phone Birthdate
for the year ;, ,
from.11,lnl( jh to �-L_l Ve�r- Event:Lf� 1 J l.iy� 3( l (/
mUnLT�ate mon ce or temporary License)
Location:. b)l 1 uO P/ )k'1•i Are you the actual proprietor? Yes ( ) No ( )
r. -ss
Are you the owner of the property of the business location? Yes (-�) No O
fi t 4
flus any ocher license of this kind been granted to. you? Yes( ) No ( ) Whereil(�
CL.!y,Year
Are any taxes, assessments or utility bills for the premises unpaid or dellqucnc'! Yes ( )
No (�). if yes, give reason.
During the past year, has a summons been issued under the Liquor Civil Liability Lav
NS 304.AB02? Yes ( ) No (,): If yes, attach summons copy.
Have you ever been convicted? Yes ( ) No (..) City
(00,er thin a traffic offense)
Is this a Joint ownership or silent partnership? Yes ( ) No C )..- If yes, please attach a
listing of complete names, dates of birth, addresses and to numbers for everyone
rLnvolv_cd.
•BY VpEHIrY TIIAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANCE IN OWNERSHIP OR MANACERS IN THE PAST YEAR.
�N3EE IIE3LjDY AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD EAGAN HARMLESS FROMANY AND ALL CLAIMS OR
INCLUDING ATTORNEYS FEES AND OTHER DEFENSE COSTS, WHICH TIIE CITY OF EACAN MAY INCUR
SON OF ANY ACTIVITIES ARISING FROM THE CRANTINC OF THIS 3.2 BEER LICENSE.
) HEREBY ACREE TO OPERATE SUCH BUSINESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA AND
HIE ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF EACAN. THE FOREGOING STATEMENTS ARE TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE
DES'r OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE � Cf �'t'✓\
First Full Middle Last
POLICE APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED DATED
21TY COUNCIL APPROVAL: Yes ( ) No ( ) SIGNED DATED
---------- — f) ----- - — 9.87
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
RESOLUTION/SILVER BELL 3 NICOLS ROAD
V. Contract 88-17, Approve Resolution Restricting On -Street
Parking (Silver Bell Road i Nicola Road) --In order to receive State
of Minnesota transportation funds for the overlay of Cedarvale
Blvd. under the above -referenced project, it is necessary to pass
a resolution restricting on -street parking from the section of
roadway being improved. Previously, the Council passed a
resolution restricting parking for the Cedarvale Boulevard section.
However, part of this project incorporates Nicols Road from Beau
de Rue ,Drive to Cedarvale Boulevard and Silver Bell Road from Beau
de Rue Drive to T.H. 13. That previous resolution did not include
these short segments on either end of the project. Therefore, the
resolution enclosed on page WE has been prepared to comply with
MnDOT funding requirements.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the resolution
restricting on -street parking for portions of Silver Bell Road and
Nicols Road for Contract 88-17 (Cedarvale Boulevard - Resurfacing)
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution.
CITY OF EAGAN
NO PARKING RESOLUTION
Street City From 7-0
Proi #
MSA 122 (Nicols Road) 546 MSA 104(Beau D Rue MSA 122 (Cedar -vale
Drive) Boulevard)
MSA 108 (Silver Bell 546 MSA 104 (Beau D Rue T.H. 13
Road) Drive)
THIS RESOLUTION', passed the 20th day of June, 1989, by the City of Eagan
in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall .hereinafter be
called the "City".
WHEREAS, these,improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on
both sides of MSA 122 (Nicols Road) and MSA 108 (Silver Bell Road); approval of
the proposed construction as a State Aid Street Project must therefore be
conditioned upon certain parking restrictions,.and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in the
"City" has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking
of motor vehicles on the east and west side of MSA 122 (Nicols Road), and MSA
108 (Silver Bell Road) at all times.
Motion -made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated: June 20. 1989
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Attest:
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular
meeting thereof assembled this 20th day of June, 1989.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
10
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
RESOLUTION/DIFFLEY ROAD
W. Project 533, Approve Resolution Restricting On -Street Parking
(Diffley Road) --In order to receive Minnesota Department of
Transportation funding through the State Aid system for the
upgrading of Diffley Road (County Road 30) from Heine Strasse Lane
to I -35E, it is necessary to pass a resolution restricting all on -
street parking based on the current design being constructed.
Similar resolutions have been provided for other portions of
Diffley Road and Pilot Knob Road suwrrently being reconstructed by
the County. Enclosed on page � is a copy of the resolution
required by MnDOT to secure State Aid financing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a resolution
restricting on -street parking (Diffley Road) and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute said resolution.
CITY OF EAGAN
NO PARKING RESOLUTION
Street City
Proi #
CSAH 30 (Diffley Road) 533
From 7-0
Heine Strasse Lane I -35E
THIS RESOLUTION, passed the 20th day of June, 1989, by the City of ,Eagan
in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be
called the 'City".
WHEREAS, these improvements do not provide adequate width for parking on
both sides of CSAR 30 ,(Diffley Road); approval of the proposed construction as
a State Aid Street Project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking
restrictions, -and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary
prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a State Aid project in the
"City" has been determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking
of motor vehicles on the east and west side of CSAR 30 (Diffley Road), at all
times.
Motion made by:
Seconded by:
Those in favor:
Those against:
Dated: June 20, 1989
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Attest:
CERTIFICATION
I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution as duly passed and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular
meeting thereof assembled this 20th day of June, 1989.
E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk
+-1
Agenda Information Memo
June 201 1969, City Council Meeting
FINAL ACCEPTANCE/KINDERCARE ADDN
S. Contract 87 -WW, Final Acceptance (Kindercare Addition - Storm
Bever) --The installation of a storm sewer to service the Kindercare
Addition under the above -referenced contract has been completed
with all final inspections performed by Public Works personnel.
It has been determined that this project satisfactorily complies
with all City requirements and approved plans and specifications.
Therefore, it is in order for formal acceptance for perpetual
maintenance.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept Contract 87 -WW
(Kindercare - Storm Sewer) for perpetual City maintenance subject
to all warranty provisions.
APPROVE CHANGE ORDER #1 REVISED/YORKTON 2ND ADDN
Y. Contract 88-22, Approve Change Order #1 Revised (Yorkton 2nd
Addition - Storm Sewer)--Yorkton 2nd Addition storm sewer provided
for drainage from that development to the existing storm sewer
system underneath.Becker Road installed with the UPS development.
However, when excavation occurred to accommodate that connection,
it was discovered that the existing storm sewer stub from Becker
Road had been severely damaged as a part of the reconstruction of
the MWCC sanitary sewer lift station at that location.
Subsequently, significant additional work was required to repair
the damage necessary to allow the completion of the project as
designed. This resulted in an additional cost of $19,634.
Presently, the City is working with the MWCC to get a commitment
to reimburse the City for these costs incurred. In the interim,
the City's contractor performed the work in accordance with City
directive and is entitled to payment through the City contract.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1
Revised for Contract 88-22 (Yorkton 2nd Addition - Storm Sewer) and
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
43
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CITY CODE AMENDMENT/REPEAL DANCE ORDINANCE
8. City Code Amendment to Chapter 6 to Repeal Dance Ordinance --
Section 6.31 regulating dances has been repealed and discussed
since the 1989 legislature repealed statutory requirements relating
to dances. Ordinances number 71 and 79 will be inserted in
preparing the revision pages.
Enclosed on page � is a copy of the ordinance amendment.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To amend City Code Chapter
6 by repealing a provision relating to dances as presented.
q
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND
LICENSING" BY REPEALING A PROVISION RELATING TO DANCES'; AND, BY
ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER,1 WHICH, AMONG
OTHER THINGS, CONTAINS PENALTY PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES 'ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Sec. 6.31 entitled "Dances" is
hereby repealed.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled 'General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" is hereby adopted in its
entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
Its: Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CITY CODE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 8/TRAFFIC REGULATIONS
AA. City Code Amendment to Chapter s for Traffic Regulations --The
ordinance codifiers are recommending that the City Code Chapter 8
entitled Traffic Regulations be amended by changing a provision
relating to adoption of the traffic regulation act by reference;
and by adopting by reference Eagan City Code Chapter 1 and Section
8.99 which among other things contain penalty provisions.
Enclosed on page q2 is an ordinance that was prepared by the
codifiers and reviewed by the City Attorney's office that adopts
Minnesota Statutes Chapters 168, 169 and 171 by reference and
provides for a penalty provision.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the amendment to
the traffic regulations section that adopts HSA Chapters 168, 169
and 171 by reference and adopt by reference Eagan City Code Chapter
1 and section 8.99.
4(.4
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE CHAPTER 8 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC REGULATIONS" BY CHANGING A
PROVISION RELATING TO ADOPTION OF THE TRAFFIC REGULATION ACT BY
REFERENCE; AND, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODE'CHAPTER
1 AND SECTION 8.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City Code Section 8.01 is hereby amended,
to read:
SECTION 8.01. MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTERS 168, 169
AND 171 ADOPTED BY REFERENCE. Except as otherwise provided
in this Chapter, or in Chapters 7 and 9 of this Code, the
regulatory and procedural provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 168, Chapter 169 (commonly referred to as the
Highway Traffic Regulation Act) and Chapter 171, as amended
through Laws 1989, are hereby incorporated herein and
adopted by reference, including the penalty provisions
thereof.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable, to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 8.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor or Petty Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted
in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
By:
Its: Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted:
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
q
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
A. Project 569, Armstrong Business Center - Utilities --On June 6,
1989, the feasibility report for the above -referenced project was
presented to the City Council in consideration of scheduling a
public hearing to formally discuss installation of the utilities
to service the Armstrong Business Center located within Lots 2-27
of Eagandale Center Industrial Park #3. Enclosed on pages
through 3 is a copy of that feasibility report for the
Council's information and reference during the presentation to be
made by the City's consulting engineer who prepared that report.
All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to
all potentially affected property owners informing them of this
public hearing. The Public Works Director and consulting engineer
will be available to further discuss any aspect of this project in
response to any questions raised during the public hearing.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing
and approve Project 569 (Armstrong Business Center - Utilities).
0
Report for
Armstrong Business Center
Utility Improvements
Project No. 569
Eagan, Minnesota
May 1989
File No. 49489
41
Sonestroo
Rosene
,., -�- Anderlik &
W.
�� Associates
LIIIV
Engineers & Architects
May 23, 1989
Honorable Mayor and Council
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Armstrong Business Center
Utility Improvements
Project No. 569
Our File No. 49489
Dear Mayor and Council:
Otto G. Sones000. P.E.
Rooen W. Rosen. RE.
Joseph C Ande3k. RE
Brddlald A. temberzy PE
Richard E Turner, RE.
James C Olson. RE
Glenn R. Cook RE.
Thomas E Noyes RE
Rouen G SCbaniChL RE,
Marvin L. Sorvala. RE.
Kenn A. Gordon. P.E.
RichaN W. Foster. RE.
Donato C. Burgardr. RE.
Jerry A. Bourton. PE
Mark A Hanson. P.E.
Rd K. Field, PE
Michael T, Rammann. P.E.
Roben R. Mellen. RE.
Da,d O Wskola, PE
Tnornas W Merlon RE.
Mkhael C. Lynch, PE,
James R. Maland. PE.
Kennm P. Ancerson. RE.
Kekh A. Bachmann, RE.
Mark R. Rath, BE.
Robes C. Russek, A I,A.
Thomas E. Angus. RE.
Ho asd A. Sanford. P.E.
Daniel J. Edgerton. PE.
Mark A. Seip. P.E.
Philip J Cart ll. RE.
Mark D Walla. RE.
Thomas R. Anderson. ALA
Gary F. Ryiander, PE.
Charles A. Erickson
l M. PaMlsky
Harlan M. Olson
Susan M. Ebedin, CPA.
Transmitted herewith is our report for Armstrong Business Center which covers
utility construction. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and pre-
liminary assessment roll.
We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a
mutually convenient time to discuss this report.
Yours very truly,
BONESTR00, ROSE`NE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Mark Hanson
MAH:li
I hereby certify that. this report was prepared
by me or under my direct supervision and that
I am a duly ReisL=red Professional Engineer
under the laws of t State of Minnesota.
G' Mark A. Hanson
Reg. No.//'-,�-U
Approved 4:
De artment of Pub c Works
Date: 8
RPT49489
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota 55113 • 612-636.4600
SCOPE: This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer, water
main and storm sewer to serve Armstrong Business Center. Armstrong Business
Center is located on approximately 22.9 acres in the southeast corner of Lone
Oak Road and Neil Armstrong Boulevard. Two large office/warehouses are pro-
posed to be constructed on, the site.
FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for
the City of 'Eagan. The project as outlined herein can beet be carried out as
one contract.
DISCUSSION:
A.) Sanitary Sewer - Sanitary sewer of sufficient depth and size to serve
Armstrong Business Center presently exists in Apollo Road and Neil Armstrong
Boulevard. Sanitary sever proposed herein provides for extending sanitary
sewer to serve only the northerly building as shown on the attached drawing.
One sewer service stub will be extended from the existing main in Neil Arm-
strong Boulevard while an 8" sanitary sewer will be extended along the east
line to serve the easterly side of the northerly building.
B.) Water Main - Water main proposed herein provides for extending an 8"
water main between the proposed buildings as shown on the attached drawing.
The 8" water main will connect to an existing 12'" main in Neil Armstrong
Boulevard and an existing 10" water main located on .the east property line of
this site. Hydrants and service lines will also be constructed off the 8"
water main to serve the proposed buildings. Armstrong Business Center is
included in the intermediate pressure zone and will experience residual and
static pressures of approximately 60 and 80 psi, respectively.
Page 1
RPT49489
SI
C.) Storm Sewer - Internal drainage from Armstrong Business Center is tribu-
tary to the existing 60" and 72'" storm sewer in Apollo Road. The existing
storm sewer in Apollo Road is not adequately sized to receive direct runoff
from Armstrong Business Center without some detention ponding. As a result, a
storm drainage study conducted by Opus Corporation in 1987 designated ponding
areas in the Industrial Park for storm water retention. Although the study
has not been formally approved or adopted by the City, its data is presently
being incorporated into the Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan Update. The pond-
ing recommended on this site is based on the Comprehensive Plan Update and is
being provided between the proposed buildings. The ponding details are listed_
below:
Pond NWL HWL Storage
Description Elevation Elevation Volume Outflow
Pond EP -10A 841 846.8 6.7 Ac.ft. 6.3 cfs
In addition to restricting the pond outflow a control manhole will also be
constructed at Apollo Road limiting the storm water flow into the existing
storm sever. The control manhole will include a 10" orfice restricting storm
water flow from the majority of the site to 9.6 cfs. A,small section of pri-
vate storm sever in the southwest corner of the site will be allowed to flow
unrestricted into the existing storm sewer in Apollo Road. The storm sewer
proposed to be constructed as part of this, project includes 30" to 12" storm
sever and is shown on the attached drawing.
EASEMENTS: Drainage and utility easements are required for this development.
A drainage and utility easement shall be incorporated over the easterly sani-
tary sever extension and the east -west water main through the site. Drainage
and utility easements are also required for the storm sewer proposed to be
RPT49489
Page 2
6i
constructed as part of this project and over Pond EP -10A. These easements
must be acquired for the project to be ;awarded.
COST ESTIMATES: Detailed cost estimates are presented at the back of this
report in Appendix A. A summary of these costs are as follows,:
A. Sanitary Sewer $ 31,830
B. Water Main 51,100
C. Lateral Storm Sewer 92,090
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $175,020
The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingen-
cies and all related overhead is $175,020. Overhead costs are estimated at
30Z and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest.
AREA TO BE INCLUDED:
ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA
Eag,anda^le Center Industrial Park 3rd Addition
Lot 2-26, Block 3
Lot 27 (270-.03), Block 3
ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited
property as shown on the attached drawings. A preliminary assessment roll is
included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be
revised based on final costs. These assessments will be spread over 10 years
at an interest rate based on the bond sale financing this project.
SANITARY SEWER_ Sanitary sewer ,proposed herein is lateral. It is, recommended
the sanitary sewer be assessed on a lct area basis to the existing lots in
Armstrong Business Center.
Page 3
RPT49489
S3
.WATER MAIN:. Water main proposed herein is lateral. It is recommended the
water main be assessed on a lot area basis to the existing lots in Armstrong
Business Center.
STORM SEWER: Storm sever proposed herein is lateral. It is recommended the
storm sever be assessed on a lot area basis to the existing lots in Armstrong;
Business Center.
REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below:
Project Cost Revenue Balance
Sanitary Sewer
Lateral $31,830
Lateral Assessment $31,830
$31,830 $33,830 -0-
Water Main
Lateral $51,100
Lateral Assessment $51,100
$51,100 $51,100 -0-
Storm Sewer
Lateral $92,090
Lateral Assessment $92,090
$92,090 $92,090 -0-
Page 4
RPT49489
S�{
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Present Feasibility Report
Public Hearing
Approve Plans and Specifications
Open Bids/Award Contract
Complete Construction
Assessment Hearing
First Payment Due vith,Real Estate Taxes
Page 5
RPT49489
S�
June
6„ 1989
June
20,, 1989'
June
6, 1989
June
20„ 1989
Fall,
1989
Winter, 1990
May„
1991
APPENDIX A
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
A. SANITARY SEWER
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST'
6" PVC Sanitary Server, 0'-15' dp-.
L.F.
$ 12.00
200
$ 2,400-.00
6" PVC San. Sever 0-15' dp.
L.F.
16'.00
760
12,160.00
Manhole
EA.
1,000.00
3
3,000.00
Construct Manhole over Exist. Sever
EA.
1,,000.00
2
2,000.00
Bituminous Street Restoration
L.S.
2,000.00
1
2,000.00
Improved Pipe Foundation
L.F.
1.00
800
800.00
Mechanical Trench Compaction
L.F.
1..00
960
960.06
-=--=--------`---------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
$,23,320.00
+5Z Contingencies
1,170.00
$ 24,490 00
+30Z Legal, Eng., Admin.,6.Bond
Int.
7,340..00
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER
RPT49489
Page 6
$ 31,830.00
APPENDIX A - CONT'D.
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
B. WATER MAIN
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
eeemmeemevea$�Q;seeeese
8" DIP Water Main
L.F.
16.00
1 41e0
22 560.00
6" DIP Water Main
L.F.
13.00
30
390.00
Hydrant
EA.
1,000.00
2
2,000.00
8" Gate Valve & Box
EA.
500.00
6
3,000.00
Wet Tap 8" DIP to Existing Main
EA.
1„600.,00
2
3,200.00
Fittings
LBS.
1.50
2,.900
4,350.00
Improved Pipe Bedding
L.F.
1.00,
500
500.00
Mechanical Trench Compaction
L.F.
1.00
1,440
1,440.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
$37,440.00
+51 Contingencies
1,870.00
$39,310.00
+30I Legal, Eng., Admin.,&
Bond
Int.
11,790.00
TOTAL WATER MAIN
$51,100.00
Page 7
RPT49489
S7
APPENDIX A - CONT'D.
PRELIMINARY'COST ESTIMATE
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
C. LATERAL STORM SEWER
+30% Legal, Eng., Admin.,,& Bond Int.
TOTAL LATERAL STORM SEWER
Page 8
RPT49489 69
$ 70,840.00
21,250.00
$ 92,090.00
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
QUANTITY
TOTAL COST
a6p...... C'L.ps.$=
pepp......vv256ve0$e
30" RCP
Storm Sewer
F
4000
1,000.00
27" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
35.00
110
3,850.00
24" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
28.00
50
1,400.00
2,1" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
26.00
800
20,800,.00
18" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
24.00
490
11,760.00
15" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
20.00
66
1,200.00
15" PVC
Storm Sewer
L.F.
20.00
140
2,800.00
12" RCP
Storm Sewer
L.F.
15.00
30
450.00
30" RCP
FES with Trash Guard
EA.
1,500.00
1
1,500.00
24" RCP
FES with Trash Guard
EA.
800.00
1
800.00
'12"RCP
FES with Trash Guard
EA.
500.00
1
500.00
41,dia.
Manhole
EA.
1,000:00
3
3,000.00
Catch basin Manhole
EA.
1,000.00
8
8,000.00
Catch basin
EA.
800.00
1
800.00
Control
Structure
EA.
2,500.00
1
2;500.00
Connect
to Existing Catch Basin
EA.
500.'00
1
500.00
Rip Rap
C.Y.
100.00
45
4,500.00
Improved Pipe Foundation
L.P.
1.00
200
200.00
Mechanical Trench Compaction
L.F.
1.00
1,705
1,705.00
-------------------------------------------------
Total
-------------------------------
$ 67,465.00
+51 Contingencies
3,375.00
+30% Legal, Eng., Admin.,,& Bond Int.
TOTAL LATERAL STORM SEWER
Page 8
RPT49489 69
$ 70,840.00
21,250.00
$ 92,090.00
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO. 569
A.) SANITARY SEWER
Parcel
Number
Lot Size,
Total Area
11.48
$2,.231
Description
of Lots
(Acres)
(Acre)
Rate/Acre
Cost Lot
EAGANDALE CENTER
INDUSTRIAL PARK
NO. 3
10-15, Block 3
6
0.60
Lot 2-8. Block 3
7
1.64
11.48
$1,390
$15,957
Lot 9, Block 3
1
1.23
1.23
1,390
1,710
Lot 10-15, Block
3 6
0.60
3.60
1,390
5,,004
Lot 16, Block,3
1
0.67
0.67
1,390
931
Lot 17-26, Block
3 10
0.55
5.50
1,390
7,645
Lot 27 (270-03),
Blk.. 3 1
0.42
0.42
1,390
583'
22.9
$31,830
B.) WATER MAIN
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3
Lot
2-8, Block 3
7
1.64
11.48
$2,.231
$25,617
Lot
9„ Block 3
1
1.23
1.23
2,231
2,745
Lot
10-15, Block 3
6
0.60
3.60
2,231
8,033
Lot
16, Block 3
1
0.67
0.67
2,.231
1,495
Lot
17-26, Block 3
10
0.55
5.50
2,231
12,273
Lot
27 (270-03), Block 3
1
0.42
0.42
2,231
937
22.9
$51,100
C.) STORM SEWER
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3
Lot
2-8, Block 3
7
1.64
11.48
$4,.021
$46,166
Lot
9, Block 3
1
1.,23
1.23
4,021
4,946
Lot
10-15, Block 3
6
0.60
3.60
4,021
14,477
Lot
16. Block 3
1
0.67
0.67
4,021
2,694
Lot
17-26, Block 3
10
0..55
5.50
4,021
22,118
,Lot
27 (270-03`), Blk. 3
1
0•.42
0.42
4,021
1,.689
22.9
$92,090
Page 9
RPT49489
6-7
SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS•CENTER
PROJECT NO. 569
COST/LOT
Parcel Sanitary
Description Sewer
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARR NO. 3
Lot 2-8., Block 3 $2,280
Lot 9, Block3 1,710
Lot 10-15, Block 3 834
Lot 16, Block 3 931
Lot 17-26, Block 3 765
Lot 27 (270-03), Blk. 3 583
RPT49489
Water
Storm
Total
Main
Sewer
Coat Lot
$3„660
$6,595
$12,535
2,745
4,946
9,401
1,339
2,413
4,586
1,495
2,694
5,120
1,227
2,212
4,,204
937
1,689
3,,,209
Page10
(--0 v
I,I
Z II,
`' �I i LONE OAK RD
4
13
z_/—_---
II
-------�
L------------- —4JF I
N
1
1�
51/24/89
! \I
m. 49489
E" PVC
SANITARY
1,
SEWER
SERVICE
I
I II
p
1-------------� 1 I I I
I II I
JSIS
------------
-----8"
8" PVC SANITY I
I
I
SEw'ER I I I
%
r------------ I
L
! l
JI !
~L---------------
i F=`- j-':?`. 1—�E------ J]
4
13
1` 1 1 i
I
10
�
9
8
N
1
1�
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS
CENTER
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
SANITARY IMPROVEMENTS
IM
f
Bonestroo
Rosene
Anderllk 8
Aeeoclates
51/24/89
Com
m. 49489
SCALE: 1" = 200'
Enpl"orn
SL hut, YlneMelU
Fig. No.
12
Y I'r 2
I,I
I
z III
p III
,' LONE OAK RD
----------------------
�
4I /
i
I
I II II' I I L-- —J l I I o
I I I I I I I I I If
L----
Z I I I
-- � I
II I I I I I I j f I
8"j. DIP WATER — I IQ I I L
I I y I l r-----------� J I I I
v fl �I I
)III ------------L -F ------------ I
fi it L --------------- A!AR-OLLO-RD------ J1 C
28
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS Ronestroo
Roeene
CENTER Anderllk 6
Associates
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Dote: 5/24/89
Comm. 49489
Z
SCALE: 1 = 200
Enpin m &Archit"10
at. hu{ MlnnMpta
Fig. No. 2
N
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
1
15
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS Ronestroo
Roeene
CENTER Anderllk 6
Associates
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Dote: 5/24/89
Comm. 49489
Z
SCALE: 1 = 200
Enpin m &Archit"10
at. hu{ MlnnMpta
Fig. No. 2
►A
s
LONE OAK RD
2
14
II-L3di\'r—RCP
12
iII
I,I
2
�II
O
tltl�I
iI
LONE OAK RD
2
14
II-L3di\'r—RCP
-------
STORM— — —�
41
— `---------------
STORM SEWER (BY OTHERS)
X
15" RCP STORM
�' IZ
1
L------------
I I
I STORM (BY OTHERS) 21" RCP STOR
II 18 IRCP STORM I
Ij
i
12" RCP STORM I
----- ORM
I � I r--- � I
A
I
L -7I�^ PONT EP
y�
z
NWL - 641.0
O
I`
i'I 4
I HWL - 646!6.
STORAGE - 617 AC. Ff.
�r-- ---- ---- r --, �
k30L�
�27!j
II
IRCP4STORMI--------- I
I I
�I
I
I
,I 1 REP STORIJ
I
I
I _
21" RCP STORM
) I
I CONTROL MH
I
�----I--- 1 ORFICEI
/
II
L ----------------- n',APlLt0—RD -----
--
14 18" RCP
III
STORM
i I I 15 13 12 11 10 g 8
ARMSTRONG BUSINESS 1 Bonestroo
Rosene
CENTER AnderllkA
Associates
UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
STORM SEINER C"m 5/24/
89
CeTnm. 494489
(p3
28
N
I
LE: 1" = 200'
BL P" Mlnnewla
Fig. No. 3
•M17 .4='
Agenda Information Memo
June 20., 1989, City Council Meeting
VACATION/WHISPERING WOODS 4TH ADDN
B. vacate Utility Easements,
response to a petition received o
scheduled a public hearing to
discuss the vacating of several u
street easement located within the
(at e ispering Woods 4th Addition.
re copies of the affected e
descriptions. These easements a -
by new dedications incorporated i_
final plat approval on June 6. A
the legal newspaper and sent to
companies as well as reviewed by
of this date, the staff has not
proposed vacation.
Whispering Woods 4th Addition --In
n May 10, 1989, the City Council
be held on June 20 to formally
tility easements and a temporary
property recently replatted into
Enclosed on pages �S through
asements with their related legal
11 have been adequately replaced
n the 4th Addition which received
11 notices have been published in
ail potentially affected utility
the Public Works Department. As
receivedany objections to the
ACTION TO BE, CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing,
and approve the vacation of various street and utility easements
located within the Whispering Woods 4th Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
ca 4
r
-4
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION
T4�E N.W. C.4# :ER OF P/.RCEL 4,_
0AWWe5,.7h. °t,. . OF TQGNypo2.-
-fnTl°N 9ru&RT PF WAT PLAT No, t9 -1Z.
IJQP-TN LINE of THE 1
NW'/A =F t.w 1/4 1
-y6[., 31,T Z-7, 5L Z3
y-NB9.53,4Z W
' •3ss,00 --,
- o
9 '^
� N'I
,
z -
A drainage and utility easementp
over that part of the NWt of the z 47 ,7
SWI of Section 31, Township 27, v °`
Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota, di
d6scribed as follows; to n
Commencing at the northwest corner
of Parcel 4,
IL
y J�,
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF'
U
all
TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No.
JAI d
m
19-12, according to She recorded plat
.3
;a
I
thereof; thence N 89 53'42" W along
o
d'd
the north line of said NWA of the
_;
,}
=
SWt a distance of 355.00 feet; thence
a
S 0°06'18" W a distance of 135.00
=I!
feet; thence S 35 18'10" Woe. distance
"
Q
of 73.43 feet; thence S 11°21'45" W
/ Q
a distance of 114.42 feet to the
O
point of, beginning of the parcel to
be d8scribed;
r
/
thence continuing
•�
S 11 21'45" W a distance of 151 22
feet; thence S 2°00'56" E a distance sNoi"'
of 126.61 feet; thence N 76038'22" W •p P'/ ; _-�
a distance of 41.48 feet; thence
N 2 00'56" W a digtance of 120.29 ?; W 4
N '
feet; thence N 11 21'4$" E a dis- f n _
tancS of 58.91 feet; thence w
N 33 46'20" E a distance of 104,93 rn
feet to the point of beginning and ,V W w ; :--.4kJ
there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.
Dater /L 0—A 14, 1567—Q�/%, ./L'. C�✓
LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
(05
y J�,
JAI d
Uoi
I
N N I 7 O N
,1 ,
h1O R.T H I ,
_;
Sr ALC— I" s&c?' '1"-40
=
�j
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.
Dater /L 0—A 14, 1567—Q�/%, ./L'. C�✓
LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
(05
EXHIBIT A
NO2TFF
SALE P•y0"
S 89'53'
T,1E elo1TNjff4T .00IJEL
DF DAPLeL A, NILLLLV.Oft�
CePna'TMc1r d= TGMI I$•
t.4mTAT,ot4 RII"NT OF VA.,
.PLAT NO. 110-12.
c � ( (• ►bAtN 4,12@ or
�. °-•,, TME Mw.!,, q jwl�l
'SEL. $11,7 271 R L3
N. W Sw 4L•w
' 4-
t Z
S '.� g Q•
3 Q
• T E• � CQ�• � I O � �' f�
,st a10 a
1 VI a. V) 1
1
OSP
ST
-- • 120,00 4 _.
` M ee. 5'$'42"W
v
I
EASEMENT DESCRIi'TION '
That part of the NW} of the SW}. o: Section 31,
Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, Minnesota,
described as -follows,
Commencing at the northwest corner of Parcel. 4-,
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT O1'' TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF
WAY PLAT No. 19-12, accor$ing tothe recorded
plat thereof; thence N 89 13142" W along the north
lino ofeaid NW},of the SW• a distance of 355,40
feett thence S 0606'18!' W a distance of 1-35-,00,
feet to thepoint of bgginning of the parcel to be
described) thence S 35 18"10"W a distance of x.9,45
feet; ,thence N 8$053'442" W a distance of 120.00
feet.; thenc8 N 0 06"18" E a distance of 114,87 feett
thence 5 89 53'42" E a distance of 84.45 feett
thence S 44053'42" E a distance of 77.59 feet's
thence S 89 053142" E a distance of '23.00 feet to
the point o1'' beginning and there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by ma or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State if Minnesota.
Datel,/qmW,r% 10 11JZ ��
RECEIVED FEB 13 W7 + LeRoy N. ''Bohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
M
s_
4
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by ma or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State if Minnesota.
Datel,/qmW,r% 10 11JZ ��
RECEIVED FEB 13 W7 + LeRoy N. ''Bohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
M
'�• E%III9IT A
N
T o
NORTH
S�AL_E- 1.1 a so,
/OG
THE "VWTVkWelT 44%"Wn.
ep VARCeL 4, MIud CA OTA.
bap"'' WIE.T eF T4Auy-
PnRTATod SUUWT of WAY
PUAT we. 19-M
NORTH LINE a ,
TNe NW 14 a 5W 4,
jeL.31,T19.0.15
i
1.5 L 1 40
II
01
%PI
f11� loin
ea
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION 1 I I .v N
f n_
A 15.00 foot drainage and utility easement
over that part of the NWS of the SWI of
ral
�i
0
a
0
Section 31. Township 27, Range 23, Dakota I V $s E
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said I,,I I'{ ;26•`.0 '
15.00 foot easement is described as follows
Commencing at the northwest corner of
Parcel 4, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS-
PORTATION RICHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12, /
according tg the recorded plat thereof)
thence N 89 53'42" W along the north line
of said NWI of t�e SWI a distance of 355.00
feet) thence S 0 06'18" W a distance of
135.00 feet; thence S 35 1p'10" W a distance
of 73,43 feet; thence S 11 b21'4�^ W a dis-
tance of 92.00 feet; thence S 8 10'55" E
a distance of 21.13 feet to the point of
beginning 8f the centerline to be described;
thence N 8810155" W along said centerline a
distance of 268.95 feet; thence N 78 09'20" W
along said centerline a distance of 155.76
feet and there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State //oof�f Minnesota.
RECEIVED FEB 1 3 19e7�—' LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
U
iI
cc
-Slp
1
aL
bM�
I
Am10pp
�
1 .
NII
I
e?� I
z
:I
i
1.5 L 1 40
II
01
%PI
f11� loin
ea
EASEMENT DESCRIPTION 1 I I .v N
f n_
A 15.00 foot drainage and utility easement
over that part of the NWS of the SWI of
ral
�i
0
a
0
Section 31. Township 27, Range 23, Dakota I V $s E
County, Minnesota, the centerline of said I,,I I'{ ;26•`.0 '
15.00 foot easement is described as follows
Commencing at the northwest corner of
Parcel 4, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANS-
PORTATION RICHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12, /
according tg the recorded plat thereof)
thence N 89 53'42" W along the north line
of said NWI of t�e SWI a distance of 355.00
feet) thence S 0 06'18" W a distance of
135.00 feet; thence S 35 1p'10" W a distance
of 73,43 feet; thence S 11 b21'4�^ W a dis-
tance of 92.00 feet; thence S 8 10'55" E
a distance of 21.13 feet to the point of
beginning 8f the centerline to be described;
thence N 8810155" W along said centerline a
distance of 268.95 feet; thence N 78 09'20" W
along said centerline a distance of 155.76
feet and there terminating.
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State //oof�f Minnesota.
RECEIVED FEB 1 3 19e7�—' LeRoy H: ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
U
-No +10a7NWe0 em"Ta.
op ea4v6 4, MoNff#PTI.
bel "Tweav d T4M.n-
goes"*Y IUAWT iR wK1
V,hT we, 19•I1L-
1 A
1 61NE o6 ,
14 e6 6W,4.
lI,T27, R=�
�• 35S.00 •`• _
N otz-r
\�i'\� • � ate,
Z
01 1
EASI?.rENT7ES2RIPTION L 1J1 ' Sn
A 15.00 fooet drainage and utility easoment 1, 1 0.
over that pa_t of the N'.J} of .he S'1:'j, of I
O -
Q
14)
U
3
w
Off!
Section 71, Township 27. Range 27, Dakota
County, Minnueota, Che centerline of said 1 .'. = 1 �•D.
15•oo foot eusament Ss described as folLows+ 1 ;'V1 5
Commencing at tho northwest corner of .1 e's\0 ?
Parcel 4, MIIINF.SoTA DEW.RTMENT OF TRANS-
IPJRTATI(:N RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12,
according t8 the recordrd plat thrraoft
thence N 89 57'4'2- 11 alcrig tl-.v north line
of said NW ;f the S J a distance of 755.0') I
feeti thence S o 06218" 9 a dintanc•± o1'
17].00 feet thence S 7: 18110" 1.1 a di^'..n1"O 111
of 77.47 feed theme.S 13021'-4�" A a d).j-• -
tante of 92.00 fee -1 C1lence S 8 1(1'55," 1.
a distance of•11.11 fent io the pcint c1-
be€innin.g 8f tEe cunterlino to ba descr'bedl
thence N 8 10'55" ►I along said c.:rterlille a
dintaned of 137.57 feed thence N 161'18'57' M
along 0;114 centerhine a distance of 148.12
Sea#1 thence N 72 46,'•57" W R10119 said center-
line a'.fietah3e•of 124.47.feet 'and there term,.tating.
r,.,•.
. .. .; ..
I,hergby, certify th:.t this survey weN presfired by me or
ered
.,w :,y. wTYy v4 .•...,
uridei'T!i' dliSCt''suCErbSeion and+that I. am.-a'd'1SY.. Regio]
-""' •—
-Land Surveyocundcr.the laws of/the Stat
e ^ Mtnneeota.
Date1� 2t ff.7 p', —
"`'"i�—� LeRoy IMonlen
RE%i14EV 4 -1 -SI Regiat,)red Land Surveyor No. 10795
7
\t`''\
a t
1g�1'\
AM
1 61NE o6 ,
14 e6 6W,4.
lI,T27, R=�
�• 35S.00 •`• _
N otz-r
\�i'\� • � ate,
Z
01 1
EASI?.rENT7ES2RIPTION L 1J1 ' Sn
A 15.00 fooet drainage and utility easoment 1, 1 0.
over that pa_t of the N'.J} of .he S'1:'j, of I
O -
Q
14)
U
3
w
Off!
Section 71, Township 27. Range 27, Dakota
County, Minnueota, Che centerline of said 1 .'. = 1 �•D.
15•oo foot eusament Ss described as folLows+ 1 ;'V1 5
Commencing at tho northwest corner of .1 e's\0 ?
Parcel 4, MIIINF.SoTA DEW.RTMENT OF TRANS-
IPJRTATI(:N RIGHT OF WAY PLAT No. 19-12,
according t8 the recordrd plat thrraoft
thence N 89 57'4'2- 11 alcrig tl-.v north line
of said NW ;f the S J a distance of 755.0') I
feeti thence S o 06218" 9 a dintanc•± o1'
17].00 feet thence S 7: 18110" 1.1 a di^'..n1"O 111
of 77.47 feed theme.S 13021'-4�" A a d).j-• -
tante of 92.00 fee -1 C1lence S 8 1(1'55," 1.
a distance of•11.11 fent io the pcint c1-
be€innin.g 8f tEe cunterlino to ba descr'bedl
thence N 8 10'55" ►I along said c.:rterlille a
dintaned of 137.57 feed thence N 161'18'57' M
along 0;114 centerhine a distance of 148.12
Sea#1 thence N 72 46,'•57" W R10119 said center-
line a'.fietah3e•of 124.47.feet 'and there term,.tating.
r,.,•.
. .. .; ..
I,hergby, certify th:.t this survey weN presfired by me or
ered
.,w :,y. wTYy v4 .•...,
uridei'T!i' dliSCt''suCErbSeion and+that I. am.-a'd'1SY.. Regio]
-""' •—
-Land Surveyocundcr.the laws of/the Stat
e ^ Mtnneeota.
Date1� 2t ff.7 p', —
"`'"i�—� LeRoy IMonlen
RE%i14EV 4 -1 -SI Regiat,)red Land Surveyor No. 10795
7
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
A. Appointment of City Insurance Representative --At the June 6,
1989 City Council meeting consideration was given to the
appointment of the City insurance representative to begin July 1,
1989. The Finance Committee, City Councilmembers Egan and McCrea,
Director of Finance and City Administrator interviewed three (3)
firms on June 2, 1989 all of whom were considered for the
appointment as the City's insurance representative. Action to
appoint insurance representative was continued for the purpose of
requesting a firm cost proposal for each of the next three (3)
years from First Insurance. The original proposal by First
Insurance was 10% commission of the total City's insurance less
workers compensation.
The Director of Finance has met with First Insurance and for a copy
of his findings, refer to the attached memo enclosed on pages
through :3j__.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To appoint a firm to act as
the City's insurance representative on all property casualty,
liability and workers compensation and further to include and
provide advise, training and other related direction in the area
of risk management.
(0
MEMO TO: CITY
HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE
DATE: JUNE 14, 1989
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT OF CITY
At the June 6, 1989 City Council meeting, the following information
was presented by way of an analysis of rates contained in the
various proposals:
Proposed Fees for Services
Consolidated First
Agencies Insurance
Hourly Fees:
Year 1 $16,500 Minimum (11 Not
$30,000 Maximum Proposed
Year 2 $18,500 Minimum (1)
$40,000 Maximum
Year 3 $18,500 Minimum 111
$50,000 Maximum
Commission: 10% on Coverages 10% on Coverage
except Workers except Worker
�31
Compensation and Compensation
2-3% on Workers
Compensation (2)
Alexander i
Alexander
$30,000
$30,000
$30,000
Not Proposed
(1) Risk management services are not included in these rates, there
would be an additional maximum of $7,000 per year for risk
management consulting.
(2) Not in proposal - question raised in interview
(3) Amounted to $19,181 on the 1988 - 1989 premium
The City Council expressed concerns that the proposals were not
necessarily comparable and that a straight commission as proposed
by First Insurance allows for significant cost increases to the
City, if the total insurance premiums escalate. Staff was directed
to work with First Insurance to arrive at an agreement whereby
total commissions paid by the City in each of the three years would
be subject to a maximum. The agreement being presented to City
Council for consideration is as follows:
Insurance Year
Commission Rate
Minimum
Maximum
1989-1990
10%
1001
$20,863
1990-1991
10%
$20,863
$21,906
1991-1992
10%
$20,863
$23,001
(1) Estimated to
be $20,863
-Ac>
TOM HEDGES
JUNE 14, 1989
PAGE TWO
The first year maximum is based on an estimated renewal premium of
$208,630 and is a 8.8% increase over the 1988-1989 commission of
$19,181. The second and third year maximums are 5% over the
previous year. The first year minimum is the actual 10% commission
while the second and third year minimums are the estimated 1989-
1990 amount.
I believe this arrangement addresses the previously expressed
concerns and protects the City as desired.
As a related issue, there has been some concern expressed about
First Insurance being able to provide the level of risk management
assistance desired by the City. There is little question that
other firms can equal or exceed First Insurance in that area in a
stand alone situation. However, as a participant in the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, risk management services are
being provided and paid for by the trust. First Insurance is asked
to coordinate those services with the City and the providers which
they have done continuously. Given the number of municipal clients
represented by First Insurance, they appear to have the necessary
relationship with the trust to allow maximum utilization of all
available services. To my knowledge they have made no effort to
duplicate those services and there is no reason to do so.
On the Workers Compensation side over 700 cities participate in the
League program designed and administered by Employee Benefit
Administration Co. For general property/casualty approximately the
same number of cities participate and risk management services are
provided through North Star Risk Services, Inc. Since these
programs are designed and operated by Cities for their specific
benefit and utilization, it is unlikely that any private insurance
company is going to be able to effectively compete with the trust
in the areas of coverage and cost. For that reason I believe it
is in the best interest of the City to engage the insurance
representative that has the best fit with the current environment.
Please let me know if you would like to discuss this matter in more
detail or if you would like any additional information.
FinarM Director/City Clerk
EJV/jeh
I1
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
DESIGNATION OF TRAILWAY/LEXINGTON POINT PKWY & DANIEL DRIVE
B. Consider Modification for Trailvay Along Lexington Point
Parkway and Daniel Drive --At the May 15, 1989 City Council meeting
the alignment for a trailway in the area of Lexington Point Parkway
and Daniel Drive was given consideration. Residents on the west
side of Daniel Drive suggested the trail alignment would be better
located and impact fewer driveways if placed on the east side of
the street. It was referenced by City staff that the trailway is
an important link to the master trail plan and that when this
subdivision was platted, a condition was agreed to between the
developer and the City that a trailway would be installed by the
developer. After receiving public testimony and Council
discussion, the item was continued until the June 20 meeting, and
staff was directed to hold an informational meeting with the
neighborhood to further discuss the trail alignment. A
neighborhood meeting was held on Thursday, June 8, and for a copy
of the information that was presented by the City and a general
response by the neighbors, refer to the attached report enclosed
on pages through that was prepared by the Parks &
Recreation Department.
Direction was given to place this item on the Consent Agenda.
However, at the request of the residents who will be asking for
time to address the proposed trailway, it appears as an item of Old
Business.
There has been various drawings and previous information provided
in City Council packets on the Daniel Drive trail alignment, and
if any member of the Council would like a new copy of that
material, please contact this office at any time.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To designate a trailway
alignment along Lexington Point Parkway and Daniel Drive.
MEMORANDUM
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR,
,1FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS 8 RECREATION
STEPHEN SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARKS PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 12, 1989
RE: PUBLIC REQUEST FOR DANIEL DRIVE TRAIL REALIGNMENT
BACKGROUND
The development agreement for LexingtonPointe Addition requires a trail or
sidewalk along the west side of Daniel Drive and on the north side of Lexington
Pointe Parkway. (See Figure #1) A request has been submitted by Lexington
Pointe residents to amend the development 'agreement realigning the trailway to
the east side of Daniel Drive. 'The petitioners cite that the realignment is
safer due to Tess road and driveway crossings.
The request was brought before the City Council at the May 16th meeting, whereby
the Council requested staff to schedule a neighborhood meeting to allow input
by all concerned residents. A neighborhood meeting was held on June S. Attached
is the attendance roster and the minutes of the meeting. In lieu of providing
an executive summary of the meeting, this report will' expand on the residents
concerns within the analysis portion of the memorandum.
ISSUE
The City Council' will need to evaluate and make recommendations determining
whether it is appropriate to amend the Lexington Pointe Development Agreement
in regard to the developers trailway obligations.
ANALYSIS
Prior to the. evaluation of a trail/sidewalk realignment the question is asked,
""should there be a pedestrian way along Daniel :Drive -and Lexington Point
Parkway?" The residents at the neighborhood meeting unanimously agreed that a
trail was not necessary. Daniel Drive lis classified as a neighborhood collector
street. The Comprehensive Parks System Plan, page E-22 of the Trail,s.chap,ter
states:
Wherever feasible require the construction of bikeways in conjunction with
all improvement of streets designated for trail development in the
following manner:
Major County Arterials - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on both
sides of roadways.
Minor County Arteri'als - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on both
sA des of the roadway.
13
DANIEL DRIVE
JUNE 12, 1989
PAGE TWO
Major City Collectors - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on one
side of the roadway and a sidewalk on the other side.
4. Minor City Collectors - An eight (8) foot bituminous trail on one
side of the roadway.
Residential/Local Streets - No trail or sidewalk shall be required.
The roadway alignment of Lexington Pointe Parkway/Daniel Drive provides the
opportunity for pedestrian linkage to trailways along both County Road #30 and
#43. Linkage to the County Road trailways provides connections to Northview
Elementary School, Eagan High school, the adjacent commercial area and numerous
parklands. Also, spur trails from Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway connect
to the Highline Corridor and Trapp Farm Park. The Comprehensive Parks Systems
Plan, page E 11/25 of the trails chapter states:
To encourage trail use, trails must be planned to connect important trail
user destinations. Popular recreational and commuter destinations include
major residential neighborhoods, school sites, park sites, shopping areas,
centers of employment, and civic facilities. The linkage between
destinations should be the most direct route available.
Typical major trail destinations include:
o Schools
o Employment centers
o Shopping centers
o Public buildings (City Hall, Libraries, Police Department, Community
Clubs)
o Parks
o MTC park and ride transit facilities
Several residents at the neighborhood meeting stated that if a pedestrian way
was necessary, they would prefer an on -street trail divided by either a curb or
white line. Both Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway are 44' road section
thus allowing two way traffic with parking on both sides. An on -street trailway
would eliminate parking on one side of the street. The loss of a parking aisle
would result in minimal impact to the neighborhood. Tom Colbert, Director of
Public Works, has provided a memorandum attached to this report which further
outlines the concerns of a an on -street trailway. The Minnesota Department of
Transportation, Bikeway Design Manual assesses an on -street trailway, with one
sided parking, similar estimated ADT's and design to Daniel Drive/Lexington
Pointe Parkway as fair to poor suitability. As well, the Comprehensive Parks
Systems Plan, page F-25 of the trails chapter states:
Trail user protection is another important concern when determining the
route and type of trail. Potential conflicts with motorists suggest that
whenever possible the bicycle and pedestrian trails should be a separate
7 V
DANIEL DRIVE
JUNE 12, 1989
PAGE THREE
facility from the street surface. It is recognized that this is not always
a feasible proposal. In developed areas of the City where trail right-
of-way cannot be obtained for a separate off-street trail, on -street trails
will be used. To provide the utmost protection to the trail user, on -
street trails should have an exclusive or semi -exclusive traffic lane from
the street.
A resident at the neighborhood meeting requested staff to evaluate a trail
alignment alternative which places a north/south trail along the highline
easement from County Road #30 to Lexington Pointe Parkway and a north/south trail
on the east side of Daniel Drive from County Road #30 to Trapp Farm Park. The
trail alternative provides reasonable pedestrian transportation to north and
south oriented designations. East/West destination (i.e., Lexington Avenue,
Commercial area, Goat Hill/HUD parks) would be provided for by trailways along
County Road #30 and future Lexington Pointe Parkway trails within the westerly
undeveloped commercial area. This alternative requests no trails along Lexington
Pointe Bikeway within the residential sub -division, therefore requiring east/west
pedestrian circulation within the roadway.
The pending pedestrian transportation obligation requires a trail along the west
side of Daniel Drive and the north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway. This would
provide contiguous pedestrian linkage from County Road #30 to County Road #43.
The Daniel Drive boulevard width can support either an 8' bituminous trail or
a 5' wide concrete sidewalk leaving an adequate clear zone for snow storage and
safety. The boulevard along the north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway can only
support a 5' wide concrete sidewalk. An 8' bituminous trail would provide only
a 2' - 2.5' clear zone. The proposed pedestrian way along the west side of
Daniel Drive and north of Lexington Pointe Parkway would cross thirty-two (32)
lots of which twenty six (26) are within the front yards crossing driveways and
six (6) with side yard lots (See Figure #2). This alternative would incur five
(5) roadway closings.
The pedestrian transportation alternative to place a trail along the east side
of Daniel Drive and the south side of Lexington Pointe Parkway influences thirty
(30) lots of which thirteen (13) are front yards crossing driveways, twelve (12)
side yards and five (5) backyards. (See Figure #2) This alternative would incur
six (6) roadway crossings. The boulevard width would support either a 5'
sidewalk or 8' bituminous trail providing an adequate clear zone for snow storage
and safety. A topographic survey was taken by Tri -Land Development to determine
whether there are any encumbrances for trail placement along this alignment.
A Tri -Land survey determined that a trailway could be placed with only minor
layout considerations.
CONCLUSION
Staff review concludes that a pedestrian way is necessary along ,Daniel
Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway in order to provide linkage to important trail
user destinations. The omission of a pedestrian link would place pedestrians
within a neighborhood collector road resulting in an unsafe situation. An on -
IS
DANIEL DRIVE
JUNE 12, 1989
PAGE FOUR
street trail alternative compromises trail user safety considering the existing
boulevard does provide for off-street pedestrian transportation. The alternative
to utilize the Highline easement and a place a trail along the east side of
Daniel Drive result in reasonable north/south linkage, but compromises east/west
continuity by omitting a trailway along Lexington Pointe Parkway. Staff
concludes that a continuous pedestrian link from County Road #30 to County Road
#43 within the boulevards of Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway provides safe
and efficient pedestrian transportation. The alternative placing a pedestrian
corridor along the west and north sides of Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway
can only support a 5' sidewalk due to available boulevard. The alternative,
placing a pedestrian corridor within the boulevard along the east and south sides
of Daniel Drive/Lexington Pointe Parkway can support either an 8' bituminous
trail or a 5' concrete sidewalk. The Comprehensive Park Systems Plan indicates
a bituminous trail is to be placed along minor collectors. This allows for both
2 -way walkers and bike traffic. The east/south alternative crosses less
driveways, although it will cross one additional road crossing than the
west/north alternative.
Therefore, this evaluation of alternatives leads staff to recommend that an 8'
bituminous path be installed on the east side of Daniel Drive and on the south
side of Lexington Pointe Parkway.
FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Staff recommends the following for City Council review and approval:
1. The development agreement for Lexington Pointe subdivision be
amended, having Tri -Land Development be responsible for the
installation of an 8' bituminous trail along the east side of Daniel
Drive and south of Lexington Pointe Parkway.
2. Tri -Land Development install this trailway prior to November 1, 1989.
U
Z 3anou
SL
7V "JO�'p"'
I ZNVMHJS , •
b
2.
31 9N X3
V.
31
fill
I. ,: :.'•✓� •'. t�•�1F p'l'y`, s � ,
� �\-..•'7...•+.'„ Nie . s,, /..,. • .
, .hd�i •Noy 1' �; � �'. � \ i
r � � ham.: . � � .� `�4,t4 � ���f �• s� �i . °s 1 �'�r, � �`1'� i �
ASI
of ''~•'� P� �, s� �_ c�l ea. •L • �.�a JwS %
.. �. .. -f _ � , ,�. � a� .: . •t Ali. yf �;
�I ., • , .1 . � ..� ,�; . , o.Ne • ` �.-.•e? .{� • Fes.
11.M=1M QI.-w.'
�..�.«• 2..J`J. _ _.__ 71.1/:
I
N.E. 1/4 SEC.26, T27, R23
I
y-rr
E7�ISSING!' i }
�4 ��lryrLl i�1 •► Z4, -q
io
—.'I^ LEXINGTON POINTE tot ADD
�+': I �,�'Li lam•- �;�`;••,'•i:+*•'\ .
:::'v • �l `' \ .e'er '!'i' :. : +1<:yAA
LEXINGTON POINTE 2W ADD.
P
L �'l
I
p;
_
SCHWANZ
$a-"
LAKE
1 PARK
/LIY
• • • • • �ia11W4(/L�XIN6T�tJ ACP
to Itta Its TR�dI r/A�(/�t X�"�i� fD11JT 2"d A>
r�n
FIGURE 1
MEMO TO: STEVE SULLIVAN, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT/PARR PLANNER
FROM: THOMAS A COLBERT#, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: JUNE 13# 1989
SUBJECT: DANIEL DRIVE - TRAILWAY LOCATION
It is my understanding that, as a result of the neighborhood
meetings recently held, some residents have mentioned the
possibility of an alternative that would allow the location of the
8' bituminous trail to be within the travelled street surface.
There are several concerns associated with giving this proposed
alternative any further consideration:
Daniel Drive and its transition into Lexington Pointe
Parkway have been identified and classified as a
neighborhood collector and have subsequently been
designed and constructed in accordance with those design
standards. The design of this roadway did not anticipate
nor provide for the proper width necessary to accommodate
a 10' wide on -street bike trail. The additional 2' in
width over the standard 8' bituminous trail is necessary
to provide additional separation between on -street
bicyclists and the adjacent traffic on this neighborhood
collector street.
2. Due to the inherent higher traffic volumes associated
with neighborhood collector and higher classified
streets, it has long been the City's policy to provide
off-street pedestrian ways (bike path/sidewalk).
3. On -street parking must be prohibited wherever an on -
street trailway system exists. This on -street parking
prohibition would create constraints on adjacent property
owners during the implementation of the annual odd/even
parking restriction ordinance.
Due to the availability of adequate public right-of-way able to
accommodate an off-street trailway system/sidewalk, it is strongly
recommended that.it remain as an off-street system for the above -
referenced reasons.
Director of Public Works
TAC/jj
DANIEL DRIVE TRAIL MEETING
THURSDAY, JUNE 8, 1989
Steve Sullivan, Landscape Architect/Parks Planner for Eagan Parks and Recreation
Department called the neighborhood meeting to order at 7:36 P.M., Thursday, June
8, 1989. Steve introduced himself and Cherryl Mesko, Department Secretary, who
was present to record minutes of the meeting. Neighbors attending the meeting
are as follows:
1. Dean Baumgartner and Michele Daufer, 4317 Lexington Pointe Parkway
2. Doug Ripperton, 920 Curry Trail
3. Kathy Kenney, 830 Curry Trail
4. Loren Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive
5. Judy Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive
6. Vernon James, 4262 Daniel Drive
7. Michael P. Murphy, 4286 Daniel Drive
8. Patrick Walsh, 4305 Lexington Pointe Parkway
9. Jan Stroshane, 4313 Lexington Pointe Parkway
10. Kay Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive
11. David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive
12. Jim Jensen and Pam Jensen, 863 Rogers Court
13. Mitch Espinosa and Laura Mikrut, 4328 Lexington Pointe Parkway
14. Bill and Amy Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway
15. Marty and Sue Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway
16. Julie Porterfield '
17. Gary Manney, 4321 Lexington Pointe Parkway
18. Tom Bydalek, 860 Rogers Court
19. Tom and Lori Esselman, 4290 Daniel Drive
20. Brian and Diane Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway
21. Kelly Thurber, 4266 Daniel Drive
22. Greg Cobb, 4323 Hamilton Drive
23. Jim Koloc, 4286 Braddock Trail
Steve explained that the City Council had asked the Department of Parks and
Recreation to facilitate a neighborhood meeting to discuss the issue of a trail
along Daniel Drive and Lexington Pointe Parkway. The minutes of this meeting
will be given to the City Council along with staff's recommendation for the June
20, 1989 Council meeting.
The City looked at Daniel Drive with the Lexington Pointe First Addition. Daniel
Drive is a connector road thus the need for pedestrian transportation to tie into
trail links that exist. This issue went before the Advisory Parks and Recreation
Commission and it was recommended that a trail/sidewalk be placed on the west
side of Daniel Drive and on the north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway. This
recommendation was brought before the City Council and was approved.
At the time the trail was being constructed, Steve Sullivan received a call from
Brad Swenson indicating that the residents did not want the trail to proceed.
There was a request from residents that the trail be placed on the east side
because it was safer due to less driveway/road crossing.
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989 - PAGE 2
Mr. Sullivan then stated that this meeting was for the neighbors and turned it
over to them for their comments and reactions.
Pat Walsh, 4305 Lexington Point Parkway asked what kind of trail the Council was
recommending. Mr. Sullivan responded that they had not made a recommendation
but that the trail planned was either a 6 foot concrete or 8 foot bituminous
trail. Mr. Sullivan also noted that the reason for this meeting was so that the
Council could hear what the neighbors had to say.
Doug Ripperton, 920 Curry Trail asked with what plat plan was the original trail
planned and what was the date of that plat. Mr. Sullivan responded that the
trail was planned with Lexington Pointe 1st Addition and the date of the recorded
plat appeared to be May 14, 1987 but he didn't have the substantiating date
information on hand. Steve noted that he would be happy to investigate that
issue if the neighbors needed further information.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway noted that he did have a copy of the
development plan. Mr. Sheehy suggested that consideration be given to placing
an 8 foot wide trail with a stripe on the street itself. This suggestion would
disrupt far less than installing a trail on either side. Mr. Sheehy further
stated that nowhere in Eagan is there a trail in front yards. His concern was
that if the trail goes in there will be costs assessed to the homeowners.
Steve Sullivan clarified that there would be minimal encumbrances within eigher
boulevard; fire hydrants, phone lines realignment, etc. and also there would be
no assessments to the homeowners for the installation of the trail. That would
be a cost responsibility of the developer. Steve also noted that staff is aware
of the in -street trail option but that Public Works is opposed to this option
because of cars parking on the street and the street was not designated for
pedestrian transportation. It was noted by a neighbor that "no parking" signs
could be posted to eliminate this concern.
Amy Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated she was opposed to the trail
as planned because it would be in their front yard. She is also opposed to the
trail being placed on either side of the street because a trail will draw kids
from other areas to their otherwise quiet area. She felt the money should be
put into other park facilities and that the trail not be place in front yards.
Steve Sullivan stated that staff is here to be unbiased and to report the
comments and concerns of the neighbors back to the Council. Amy Sheehy
reiterated that she was opposed to having the trail in their front yard and felt
that the residents on the opposite side of the street may be opposed to the trail
being placed on their side of the street.
Tom Esselman, 4290 Daniel Drive asked if this property was originally zoned
commercial. Steve responded that it was and that it was part of the Lexington
South PD. Tom Esselman then asked if when this property was rezoned residential
did anyone look at the change in the trail at that time. He also concurred with
the in -street option for a trail. Mr. Esselman asked if the purpose for the
trail was to draw children to a park. Steve responded that it was partially for
access to Trapp Farm Park but was also a link in the overall trail system.
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 3
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive stated that there was a bike trail currently
planned along the power line easement and that a trail linking to Schwanz Lake
there would be no need for a trail on Lexington Pointe Parkway. He felt the
connection could be along the power line easement. Steve Sullivan asked where
Mr. Ashton envisioned the trail corridor to Schwanz. David responded that it
could go along the east side of Daniel Drive and tie into Schwanz Lake but that
lines could still be painted on the street itself.
Jim Jensen, 863 Rodgers Court asked if there had been any consideration taken
for safety when the trail was planned on the east side of Daniel Drive and
wondered how something like this could happen. He stated that the residents on
the east side of Daniel Drive were told that the trail would go on the west side
when the property was platted. Why has it changed now. Steve Sullivan, noting
that this was a good question, stated that the trail was designated on the west
side of Daniel Drive when the rezoning occurred. It was felt there was a need
to provide for pedestrian transportation along Daniel Drive. The reasonfor the
possible change is due to the request from the Lexington Pointe residents.
A neighbor stated that the Eagan This Week reported this issue had already been
approved and that Pam McCrea had stated this was approved per the minutes. Steve
Sullivan clarified the issue by stating that the Council had stated they didn't'
feel comfortable making a decision with only one side of this issue being
represented and suggested that a meeting be scheduled with the residents on both
sides to see what the reaction was. Steve reiterated that nothing had been
authorized by the City Council changing this issue.
Doug Ripperton, 920 Curry Trail stated that he moved into his home in September
and had checked about the trail before he moved in. He stated that he will sell
his home and move if this trail is installed because he doesn't care if people
can't get to the parks and he doesn't want people riding through his yard. He
chose this location because of the privacy.
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive, expressed his frustration with Tri -Land in
failing to inform purchasers that this trail was planned. He noted that he had
seen two different maps showing trails. He felt the argument was between the
homeowners and the developer, not the City of Eagan. Mr. Ashton also stated that
a letter had gone out approximately a month ago to residents farther west telling
them of the proposed trail. He found it irresponsible on the part of Tri -Land
not to notify purchasers of the planned trail.
Kathy Kenne, 830 Curry Trail stated theirs was the first house built and the
proposed trail will go through their side yard. They would not have picked this
location to build a home had they known the trail would be installed at this
location. She asked if an in -street trail would be an option. Steve Sullivan
responded that this would need to be evaluated and all options will be
considered.
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 4
Greg Cobb, 4323 Hamilton. Drive stated that the proposed trail would also go
through his side yard. He had carefully considered the positioning of his home
to allow for a large side yard and with this trail he will lose a good portion
of it. Steve Sullivan commented that usually trails are installed before
development occurs sothis type of problem doesn't typically occur. During this
construction process, however, the trail wasn't installed during road
construction because of the concern for the trail being destroyed during
construction of the homes. The concern was raised regarding the destruction that
will occur to existing driveways now due to the installation of a trail. Mr.
Sullivan noted that the sequencing of this particular development is not typical
of most construction.
Diane Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that she will need to
install a fence because of the increased bike traffic this trail will cause as
we19 as the problem of existing tree roots affecting the trail in the long term.
She stated she was opposed to the trail all together and would prefer an in -
street trail.
Warren Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive is one of the homeowners whose front yard would
be affected and expressed his concern for pulling into traffic and possibly
hitting a child who may be on the bike trail. He is also concerned about the
aesthetics of the trail and is opposed to it being installed in this location.
Mike Murphy, 4286 Denmark Drive noted that he is an original' owner in the
neighborhood and is concerned about the neighborhood being divided over this
issue and from what he has heard feels that no one wants the trail at all. He
cited a political aspect of a similar issue in DuPage County, Illinois where a
road was proposed to be built in people's yards. The affected people banded
together and eventually ousted all the politicians in office and replaced them.
He stated that there is only a fraction of the neighborhood represented at the
meeting tonight and felt it was important to look at other alternatives to the
trai 1.
Tom Esselman,, 4290 Daniel Drive stated' that since the meeting was for the
neighborhood they should have the ability to make a decision. Considering all
the safety issues, he felt the decision should be an easy one. Steve Sullivan.
reminded the group that he was not there to make a decision, rather he will be
writing a report that will be given to the City Council for their review at the
June 20th Council.meeting.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lex-ington Pointe Parkway indicated that he would be at the June
20th meeting and asked if they could request this item to be placed on the agenda
early so that people will be able to attend in force. David Ashton commented
that since this falls under Old Business it is usually early in the agenda.
Julie Porterfield, 4210 Daniel Drive stated that this is the second home they
have lived in in this neighborhood and that they were not notified either time,
they purchased that this trail would be going in. She asked if June 20th would
provide for a final decision or would there be more time for rebuttal. Steve
�3
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 5
Sullivan responded that the intention is to have a decision made that night if
the issue is clear and there is a complete understanding of all the implications.
Marty Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that it appeared as though
the Council should be hearing these comments. He noted his preference would be
for a sidewalk rather than a bituminous trail and that the trail be run along
the power lines. Steve Sullivan responded that the power line area was a
proposed trail corridor. Marty Seidl commented that it appears at this point
that everyone is opposed to the trail completely.
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive stated that the Parks Department has been very
cooperative in this effort and would not dwell on whether or not they were biased
in any way. He continued that the Council seems to have the impression that
there is a difference between a sidewalk and bike trail and that a bike trail
will generate more traffic because it is a connector system. The question seemed
to be is a sidewalk safer than a bike trail.
Mike Murphy, 4286 Daniel Drive stated that the City wants to connect the bike
trails and agreed that this is a good idea but that it should be done before
buildings are constructed. He further stated that the power line corridor would
provide the connection necessary and that perhaps this trail should just be
written off as a mistake. He felt the situation had been handled improperly and
should just be dropped and that what needs to happen is to weigh the public good
versus the neighborhood concerns for safety. Which one will win?
Susan Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated that the main point is that
the neighborhood doesn't want a trail in their front yard. They do like the park
and trails but would prefer that there not be one in their neighborhood.
Jim Jensen, 863 Rogers Court noting he is one of the oldest residents in this
area considers this the ultimate stab in the back to have this trail moved in
that will generate a great deal of noise and distractions. He commented that
it is a shame that so many people have to be punished because of Tri -Land's
mistake.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway asked if Tri -Land will be at the
Council meeting on June 20th to respond to the concerns of the neighborhood.
Steve Sullivan noted that Tri -Land will concur with the Council's decision and
that the only obligation Tri -Land has at this time is a binding development
agreement that states a trail be placed on the west side of Daniel Drive and the
north side of Lexington Pointe Parkway.
Gary Manney, 4321 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated that Tri -Land doesn't want the
trail to be installed either. They don't want to absorb the expense of tearing
through driveways and repairing them when they're done. He stated that a class
action suit is an option if people wanted to pursue this issue. Gary further
commented that he did not want to see any more ill feelings over "the thi-ng" and
3�
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 6
suggested that a vote be called to see how the group, as a whole feels about the
trail. There were further comments regarding school traffic from Diffley to
Schwanz with the concern for high school kids being out on the trail in a
neighborhood of young children.
Marty Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that the in -street option
was suggested and as soon as soon as the stripe was mentioned the Mayor said
"no". He further stated that the collector affects the whole neighborhood and
that the neighborhood's reaction to this trail should be considered. Steve
Sullivan clarified that the term "collector" is determined by the volume of use,
thus Daniel Drive was identified as a collector based on the number of trips that
this street would handle based on the proposed development.
David Ashton asked if eliminating the trail would be setting a precedent.
Another question by a neighbor was, is there a trail anywhere in the City of
Eagan placed in the front yards of homes?" David Ashton responded that there
is one on Blackhawk and perhaps the Council should take a look at this particular
case.
Jim Koloc, 4286 Braddock Trail stated that he had come tonight prepared to battle
but after listening to all the questions and comments concurred with Mr. Manney's
suggestion that the group vote on what they want.
Kelly Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive stated she had attended the previous meetings
and noted that the Council is big on the overall trail system and did not want
to deviate from the original trail plan. Her preference is to have the trail
across the street where it would be set on back yards rather than front yards.
Mitch Espinosa, 4328 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that it appears that the
trail is there for a shortcut. Perhaps by eliminating the trail bikers will need
to ride a longer distance, thus getting more exercise. He stated he did not want
the trail at all.
Greg Cobb, 4323 Hamilton Drive commented that the Council should represent the
people and the good of the people and if they don't see a need for a trail such
as this, then the Council should be listening to what the people want.
David Ashton, 4278 Daniel Drive asked if the Council will read these minutes.
Steve Sullivan responded that they would be given a copy of them along with
staff's recommendation. Mr. Ashton then commented that if the City is providing
this trail for greater Eagan then perhaps it is necessary. Because it will not
help those people west of Lexington and north of Diffley, it appears that this
trail link will only serve this immediate neighborhood. Since this does not
affect greater Eagan, perhaps the trail should not be installed.
Venon James, 4262 Daniel Drive stated that if the Council decided that no matter
what, this trail is going to be installed he would prefer it be placed -on the
east side of Daniel Drive. His first preference, however, is not to have a trail
at all.
112
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 7
Gary Manney; 4321 Lexington Pointe Parkway reiterated that he didn't want to see
this neighborhood separated because of this issue. The neighborhood will be
stuck with the trail if it does go in and he feels that it is the Council's job
as elected officials to represent the people. He further stated that he does
not see this trail being installed for the betterment of Eagan in general. Most
people will not be using this trail; only residents in the area.
Brian Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented on the safety issue
involved. He felt the Council should give a good deal of consideration to this
issue alone.
Jim Koloc, 4286 Braddock Trail noted that the City is big on their master plan,
however they need to consider what residents say. He stated he had moved here
from a Bloomington neighborhood that was divided over a similar issue.
Marty Seidl, 4329 Lexington Pointe Parkway noted for the record that this issue
has neighbors siding against each other. He knows there are meetings going on
on each side of the street separating neighbors and causing problems.
Mitch Espinosa, 4328 Lexington Pointe Parkway asked if any council member had
a trail going through their front yard.
Brian Clark, 4336 Lexington Pointe Parkway stated that this shouldn't be an issue
of neighbor against neighbor, rather neighborhood against Council to abolish this
trail.
Amy Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway commented that she did not want to be
divided from her neighbors since she planned on living in this area for a long
time. Her concern was also that a trail would devalue her property that she
carefully selected.
Bill Sheehy, 4332 Lexington Pointe Parkway asked if there were regulations for
fences being installed in front yards. Steve Sullivan responded that there are
specific ordinances for fences on private property and will investigate what they
are. David Ashton commented that he knew that fences are not allowed in front
yards.
Loren Hiatt, 4282 Daniel Drive commented that this issue had been beaten to death
and asked that the minutes reflect unanimous support for the trail to be
eliminated and suggested that everyone show up on June 20th to show their
support.
Mike Murphy, 4286 Daniel Drive reiterated that the Council should research the
DuPage County issue he had described earlier. He feels that this issue may bring
a great deal of support from residents throughout the City.
Jim Jensen, 863 Rogers Court asked if this decision needed to be made on June
20th. Steve Sullivan stated that it was felt this was adequate time for the
Council to review the results of the meeting and to weigh the issues that have
been presented.
oil
DANIEL DRIVE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES
JUNE 8, 1989
PAGE 8
Steve Sullivan stated he had not planned on taking a vote, however if everyone
felt strongly about it, they would handle it in that fashion.
The first question asked was, "Who does not want a trail". The response was
unanimous by all people attending the meeting.
The second action was to outline some of the options the residents would like
to have considered if it is determined that a trail still be installed.
1. A trail be installed on the east side of Daniel Drive to Trapp Farm
Park. Eliminate the trail on Lexington Point Parkway and continue
the trail along the power line easement.
2. Install an in -street trail 8 feet from the curb marked by either a
white line or a curb along all of Daniel Drive.
David Ashton suggested that everyone show up on June 20th to support the in -
street trail if the Council continues to insist on a trail in this location.
Doug Ripperton asked if he could have a copy of the people who had attended
tonight's meeting. Steve said a copy would be available to anyone after the
meeting.
Brian Clark suggested sending letters to all Council Members in addition to
showing up on June 20th. Diane Clark asked if the resident's would be able to
find out what was going into the staff's recommendation. Steve Sullivan
responded that this information, along with the minutes would be available to
residents after Thursday, June 15th.
The meeting ended at approximately 9:15 P.M.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL PERMIT/NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY FOR STEEL FRAME BUILDING
C. special Permit for Northern Natural Gas Company to Construct
a steel Frame Building Over an Existing Meter and Regulatory
Facility --Mr. Dennis Werkmeister, representing Northern Natural Gas
Company, is requesting a continuance until the July 18 City Council
meeting for further consideration by the City Council on the
special permit to allow the construction of a building over the
existing meter and regulatory facility. Mr. Werkmeister has
requested the additional time to pursue the City's request for a
brick or stone fascia with the architectural/engineering division.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize a continuance
of the special permit for Northern Natural Gas to construct a steel
frame building over the existing meter and regulatory facility
until the July 18 meeting.
SPECIAL NOTE: Mr. Al Herman and those residents who have appeared
at previous meetings have been contacted by the Department of
Community Development advising them of the request for a
continuance.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
NAEGELE'OUTDOOR.ADVERTISING SIGN/CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
D. Conditional Use Permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to
Allow a 40 Foot Tall V -Shaped Billboard Advertising sign --This item
was continued from the March 7, 1989 City Council meeting to
request a special study by the Director of Community Development
on high regulations for outdoor advertising signs in other
communities. Several communities were reviewed and for a copy of
that study and, results, refer to staff memo enclosed on pages
through
Also enclosed on pages 0 through is a copy of the
original staff report that was prepared f r the Advisory Planning
Commission meetings that were held December 22,, 1988 and January
24, 1989 -
It is appropriate to address the conditional use permit unless
there is an ordinance change proposed as a result of the findings
prepared by Community Development.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1)
direction regarding an ordinance amendment to the outdoor
advertisement regulations or 2) to approve or deny the conditional
use permit for Naegele Outdoor Advertising to allow a billboard
advertising sign in an,Ll district.
* This study and memo were not available for Friday's packet_ They
will be enclosed in the Monday Additional Information packet.
W061
MW
i%j-kEGELE
Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
of the Twin Cities
February 17, 1989
Mr. Vic Ellison
Mayor
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55121
Mayor Eillison and Members of the City Council:
We respectfully request a continuance of Naegele Outdoor Advertising's
-application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a billboard advertising
sign on Light Industiral District Lot 2, Block 1 of the S & WA ndustrial
Acres addition, along Highway 13 in the SW 1/4 of Section 19, from the
City Council meeting agenda of February 21, 1989 to the next Council hearing
scheduled for March 7, 1989.
The purpose of this continuance is an effort on the part of the land owner
of the above noted parcel, to resolve the outstanding financial obligations
and assessments due the City as noted in the Planning Staff's report of
December 15, 1988.
We have been advised by the land owner that he will be meeting with Mr.
Gene Van Overbeke, Director of Finance, regarding the assessments due and
hopes to resolve this matter at that time.
Please direct your staff to contact me should this request for a change
in venue prove problematic.
Sincere, ,
Arthur R. Dean
Real Estate Services
ARD/bkw
CC: Mr. Jim Sturm
City Planner
Karen Finnegan
Clerk
1700 West 78th Street • Minneapolis, MN 55423 •612/869-1900
7apnet: 612-869-3897
\3
o r
iOBJECTt ..OMITIOiAL =3 MMMIT ..:..
�.4 APPLICAl1'i'& 1l�OQ.i A!lDO� TISI/G, WC
VJ
I. LOCATION& ZtUVTRIAI'. ACRFS
CI8T�1G'EONZiGt
mLI• ` �ilRIlli,i
M..: .. .
Y .24. -909
DATE OF PUBLIC ZZARING& BMRER 22 1988 - ,T11�OAR
DATE OF REPORT& DBC3KBER 151 1986 (REVISED
REPORTED SYS KAWMW Alm WGXNZZ NG DiPARTHMS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An' application has been submitted requesting .a Conditional 'Use
permit to allow a 40' -tall;, `V' -shaped billboard advertising sign
on lot 2, block 1, s i W Industrial Acres. This lot is located
between Highway 13 and the frontage road that serves E -Z Mini
Storage to the north.
Currently, lot 2 is vacant. If and When that lot develops, that
business would not be allowed a business sign if the billboard is
approved. Co-3—edescribee a 'business sign' as any align upon
which there is any name, designation, or advertising Which has as
its purpose business, professional or oouerciaT advertising and
which is related directly to the use of the premises upon which
the sign is located.
The signage area measures 10.5' z 36'', totaling 378 square feet.
If approved, this Conditional Us* Permit shall be subject to the
following conditions:
1. There shall be a'one-time sign fee of $2.50 per square foot.
2.. The.closest portion of the sign to the property line shall be
10 feet.
3. No business sign shall be permitted' on lot 2 if this
advertising sign is app
4. This developmentions as identifiedallfuliill its past
outstanding
ding financial
obli
Cl
•
•
V
fINABCIAL OBLIGATIONS2 =In reaaarahisy the financial 1.{'istorical
records. for this parcel, 'it was determined that ibis property has
fulfilled its financial .Abligations selating to trunk area
sanitary sewer„ lateral benefit from trunk mater main, lateral
benefit from trunk sanitary .sewer sad trunk #rsa storm serer (but
onlya portion of the property). -Ht bas men iliscovered that
this property has i'nadvertentl_'y assa omitted Emu fulfilling its
financial obligations relating:to_,Lba following items's
ITEM PAO.i MATE MY
Trunk Area Water 232 $1.,115/ac 6.65 ac $ 8,008
Yater Availability
Charge (WAC) 232 2,015/ac 6.65 ac 13,803
Trunk Area Storm
Sewer (Rema-ining
Area) 186 0.083/of 68,271 of
0.57 ac) 5,666
TOTAL OUTSTANDING FINANCIAL OBLIGATION •$28,477
If it is required that this outstanding financial obligation is
made as a con_dit,ion of approval for the petitioned Conditional
Use Permit, the final financial obligation ahould'be calculated
in accordance with the rates in effect at the time of final
approval.
9;)---,.,/
. s
,
_ . �{.1• �:. Z,..�"... P a ywT'"�1^ ... Tom.. ..._ i)�!e....
PIIBLIC STREETSnrmwVI�18CW. .YGRTI01�tj�r`t W ..411
it onal Use Permit "app os-4*"IvEs ,portai'aing
.
' to a specific parcelT �T, .
history peit�(:Fde sv m . amending
assessment histo is r'Torero. �„
assessments of record. In •OCOlaiiies +!I �resemFE ty jlolicie■
�
lie' tility
relating to the ti ►g "..lot {r « " `
panc3s
-
1. " the -�ei3oving Tiaa�►e`�i'Y"�Ip �tisa
w" for Council consideraR:.:;
ITEM
Mater Trunk -"Ilsymc - g.j9 jPa 496008
.
.41
Water Availability
Charge `�"`'�l,013%c 4.165 at 38,803
Storm Sewer Trunk y 3jof -(8.271 of --, Se666
"
TOTAL PROPOSED FMNCM OBLIGATION SM477
t
L
� ' • 4 y� fl ' ..7..nr
M A •sem °�
W t NDUS SIAL i� ItES
3
UP *Ar PI.Ar ppj
/ d1 - ----- --
ol
r46 LOT "'3.i• ::V !I >� f
' /�ft
�
if v
rr6 fir'
• r 1 •� '••�. 000• 4,50
. �}
omi®r
•.. ! y ..,Z. • • Y
h- A4
14
!�+ Lor �' ,• i• E �. �..
It
t
i I,A .yam • r00A
Idolb
Ap It
. . .•'�,��M•1 // I • T + • _� 11\y M11r4. wY.Y rQ�N tt.
Y
OWL
Uti"LL
Cox
i
js
r, NAWN
AM
1 (
71 �
Vie; :• •• ,�}t y
M;t1y�•'�. 7;t iC j31 '•I •.l .i�,'r .�• �+ • 4000
IP'�r°
,gyp 1 4 `�I�I .. • �. .
1i � I t .{}v$Y�Y,.;':A, � vim{ �• T r 3,�r .. .t - • •:t �.�".
LO
JIT
a of
v,{i L �(P{ f ••
�'' •h :?i::•' ' r • •
M A o 0
STO(.'M SCwt� "T�uwti — ol�.tiif; % of b.S�S AULIS
w�
_ _ as .
or
�• •. ��.- �r
in
rV
AP wit
�2.' • Iaq j y,.•.
i xg
� •. LPFFI F..'ll�
JL.; 0.
• • r � i% w
.,a,...-
iP -Ad:
7- suBJEClr4pA Y
y `
city of eapari STORM SEWER ':' avwoM.a::ana.►a
PUBLIC
WORKS
MASTERDE PAR
INV"IN..,.Ld
.�•.-. .'i' -' -iii I
-+..
_ _ _ _. _... _._. - tom.'•._ � - ., _ � _
06 WAW
-MYrs- �\ .yam nF :� .�''� L�'�'•' "�
I j .y s 1 . „ ...:. ..
r , • r -i r , - •,J
/ �� riil•�• MSD % v�.: �i.
16•i �:,' [r::- i fir. rrrhT r
•�� 970,
Ile
1.2 ,•� %. sal �' ..
' `- r • I'
129
'SUBJECT,, ;PARCEL
IG03
city of eagand pias: s°
_ WATER aowovr
ct �.: :
e PUBLIC-
WORKS MASTER TLAN
DEPARTbE
di
q
1
C
�..1p
RE, -SNC
MINI 1:= .
�.:. w..
._
STORAGE r - - 77-77W�_F _
U
edcisory Planning Ocmdesion
=ty of Eagan
3830 Piot Knob Road -
Sagan, M 55122
Dear ^omniss:icn Members:
Ttis x111 acknowledge receipt of your notice of a second
Putlic Hearing on Thursday, December n, 1918relative to the
application of Naeeele Outdoor Advertising to erect a billboard
#139
Again,
2, Plock 1 in the 5 and 11 Industrial acres along Highway
#139
Again, this notice comes as somewhat of a surprise and certainly
as a disappointment in light cf all the part signs denials* let
more than a year ago or so we discussed the possM:lity of a small
TusineFs identification signs along new highway /13 an the back of
cis prcjeet now that the traffic has leen pertassaently diverted off
old highway M. and were,refamd. We were told at the tine to
conform with the ordinance whieb places a real hardship an our al•ility
to advertise our onsite tusinesse We accepted that decision and are
trvin,v to live with it. The thought that the duty would now entertain
an enormous tilltoard leads ns to gaevUce that deeisdon. I also
understand that like I494 and 1358 which thea VIIs trying to control
that it was their intention to control the Dsdar-� !13 area as
well.:..:.:;.,
In light of the aboie we oppoes'the likelihood that a bi2.Doard
sign would now be easslidered m the Vropaty nezt'docr `'tows. a.
Unfortunately, I shall be with q fad !er the tbrirtmr Holiday
in another otate, but Lt this letter smvgy4W strangest
atiection.
Yery truly yours,
Z.,L Kid Storage OMP87
-�•''= - arleg A O
_ ..N:F.
-, _.
I r '
l�
6009% QR
The following *ppoistments` r '
1. Developers Task koros-`#oott SOMOy And NO
2. Bpecisl' ss soeat p3asi a
mks
- -.rlkl
-- 'iblr! 11is�isC AI RVI aim
`—i s'
and times.
Item C under Old Business tementry pass - �sontler Companies)
and Items E i F ander Now Business (Ordinance &pendment - Subdivision
Platting Requirements and Ordiaaace Bmeadr*at-Vablic assign of
y Street and Utility Improvements) vete continued. to -the January 26,
1989, Advisory Planning Commission meeting.
Trygg moved, Markley seconded, the action to appcove the agenda
as amended. All voted in favor.
BIIB�TE6
December 22. ieae. Member Groves requested a change on page 6,
paragraph 1, the first sentence should read 011e stated that the total
volume of issues were too great to take any action at that time."
Voracek moved, Trygg seconded, the motion to approve the
December 22r 1988r Advisory Planning Commission mantes as amended.
All voted 1n favor.
At this point, Chairman Tawlenty explained the Advisory Planning
Commission procedures to the Commission and the,Vublic.:.,,,,_.
s
Chairman Pawlenty opened the'iirst public bearing regarding a
conditional use permit to allow a billboard advertising sign in a
Light Industrial district on Lot 2, Block 1, a a V UdustrIal Acres,
along Sighway 13 in the soathwast quarter of •ecttoa la.
City Planner Sturm summarised tbe'4idtdmt1om'Aec
Commission.
Arthur Dean, representative.for as -AinAioant Of
Informed the Council that ooaditional use permits for as board
advertising signs had been allowed in the pot. -'No farther stated
i
they had alerted the adjacent gcoperty owners and Maegale feels the
i. request is within the ordiaaaoe.
There was no public comment. "'` •
. _•is'.:: 4 FS. C�
Tage 3/ZM_ Ja &Wdftii�'j!!.7<atAna ION ,;��;�
Member Craves goestioai G UigqLht i Abe"icier #[gni: ar.
Stars stated shoat six foot. 15asber Suler t.am; p acs -
cegardiag the pat s! �.
-141sq►a1n. s
.grounds for the aania��lor the, or . ick.
-Outlined the alga regniresaota;��rr, � at�..7M_ F.
of a pylon sign acid ae lave=ttii� gi. s be -tilt
the sign exceeded the square, footoicw�at._-r-
. Member Voracek questiossd 3f _��tvore o Vlaoad �: r^aa . ;: -•
expressway if it was within tae vearetion of :tbe :Coascil.: are �+
stated yes. are Voracek questioned the number at billboards presently
In Eagan. Mr. Sturm shoved their locations. ar. 7erkley asked if
there were any freeway standards regarding biilboards.Aft. 41tusm
stated no.
Chairman Pawlenty stated be felt billboards were bad aesthetics
and that the size exceeded code. 1% felt the City sbosld restrict
billboard requirements even further. Somber Miller stated he felt the
code should be changed to allow applicants to know the rules.
Graves moved, Markley seconded, the notion to close the public
bearing and deny the application for a conditional usepreit to
allow a billboard advertising sign in a Light Industrial district on 1
Lot 2, Block 1, S i M Industrial Acres, along Highway 13 1n the
southwest quarter of Section 19, as submitted by aaegele Outdoor
Advertising, Inc. All voted in favor.
MWE CREM 100 722 ADDITION - 1aDSMAL UM COMM
( Chairman Pawlenty opened the asst..ppuublic bearing regarding the
application for a prelislAary plat aons3stiny of two lots and an
P outlot on 19.5 Limited Business Zoned acres within4the Town Centre
100 Planned Development located south of Mown Centra Drive and north
of O'Leary Lake in the northeast quarter of Section 15,
City Planner Dim Sturm summarised the application.'.
Charles Bartholdi (Federal load Campan) A&owed the location of
the proposed plat to the Commission. Se explained the two Abases of
the project and the quare footage, tile, and property toning. ee
stated the plat met City sequiruments. ie further stated there were
other representatives from federal land_Ompany available for
questions. -
Tom Bolger, 3528 Widgeon Lane, bad concerns regarding the
drainage to the lake and tbe.vlow of the buildings from his property.
F Assistant City Engineer mike toertsch explained the drainage for the
project.
Member Voraoek questioned the building elevation and asked if
: there were any vents on the roof. Sr. Stara stated there was no
•
N B N O R A N D D N
TO: Jim Sheldon
FROM: Joe Earley
DATE: February 13, 1989
RE: Municipal Authority to Regulate Billboards
Our File No.: 206-5316 (ODE)
Jim:
The City of Eagan is currently examining its authority to regulate
off-site advertising in general and billboards in particular.
Since this would involve the regulation of commercial speech, the
constitutional test that must be met is as follows:
1. The regulation must directly advance a significant government
interest; •
2. it must be a legitimate time, place and manner restriction;
3. The regulation should be content neutral; and
4. Ample open alternative channels of communication should remain.
I have found three cases in Minnesota that further explain these
constitutional requirements. The first is Arcadia Development Corp.
y. City of Bloomington, 125 N.W.2d 846 (1964). In this case, the
Supreme Court upheld the Trial Court's finding that Bloomington's
denial of a permit was arbitrary and capricious. Their reasoning was
that the Council gave absolutely no reason for the denial. The
Supreme Court further went on to say I... The City can unquestionably
regulate, even stringently, the use, size and position of business
signs and advertising billboards but the regulations as applied must
still bear a reasonable relation to the purposes they are meant to
attain." Id. at 851.
The second case is N)'Poel` Outdoor AOV CO V Village or ninnc CVL&S,
162 N.W.2d 206 (1968). In this case, Minnetonka passed a zoning
ordinance prohibiting billboards in residential districts and
ordering the removal of all non -conforming billboards. The Court
examined two issues. The first, whether a municipality has the power
to prohibit by zoning ordinance the use of land in residential
districts for billboard advertising and secondly, if the City could •
require the removal of pre-existing billboards. The Court held that
the zoning ordinance was constitutional and stated "If the challenged
X63
A
restriction is reasonably related to promoting the general welfare of
the community or any other legitimate police power objective, the
fact that aesthetic considerations were a significant factor in
motivating its adoption cannot justify holding it unconstitutional."
". at 212.
Minnetonka was also allowed to demand the removal of pre-existing
billboards but this was due to the type of lease that Naegele
utilized. The Court seemed to say that depending on the terms of the
lease or agreement with the owner of the property on which the
billboard was located, the City may have to proceed by eminent domain
against existing billboards.
The third and most recent case isi�ty of Cottage Grove v. Ott, 395
N.W.2d 111, (Minn. App. 1986). Cottage Grove passed an ordinance
prohibiting placement of all off -premises advertising signs and
defined them as follows: "A free-standing sign which directs
attention to a business, commodity, service or entertainment not
exclusively related to the premises where such a sign is located or
to which it is affixed." This definition is very similar to Eagan's
ordinance definition of "advertising signs". (Section 4.20(c)(2)).
Cottage Grove did continue to allow on -premises signs. The Court of
Appeals ruled that the City may prohibit commercial speech expressed
on billboards based upon its interest in traffic safety and
aesthetics and that Cottage Grove's ordinance was a permissible
regulation of commercial speech and did not reach protected
non-commercial speech. Id. at 114, 115.
In discussing the constitutionality of the Cottage Grove ordinance,
the Appeals Court cited the controlling case regarding the regulation
of commercial speech expressed through or in the nature of billboards
as Metromedia. Inc. v. City of San Diego, 453 U.S. 490, 101 S. Ct.
2882 (1981). In Metromedia, the San Diego ordinance prohibited
off -premises signs containing commercial messages while allowing
on -premises signs. The Court found such regulation permissible and
stated "If the City has a sufficient basis for believing that
billboards are traffic hazards and are unattractive, then obviously
the most direct and perhaps the only effective approach to solving
the problems they create is to prohibit them." Metromedia at 508, 101
S. Ct. at 2893.
It should be noted that the Eagan City Code classifies advertising
signs as a conditional use. Courts have found that where erection of
a billboard requires obtaining a permit as a conditional use, the
grant or denial of the permit may not be based upon a subjective
evaluation that the sign would be aestheticly objectionable but must
instead be grounded upon compliance or non-compliance with objective
sta m9ards enumerated in the zoning ordinance. Mcouiiiin Mun. Cg1.R F
Section 24.382, (3rd Ed.).
JPE/djk
l�
Agenda Information Memo
.June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting.
SPECIAL USEPERMITEXTENSION/GENERAL PUMP
E. Special Use Permit Extension for General Pump, for their
Temporary Mobile Office --The Department of Community Development
has received a request from Gordon Baird, Director of Operations,
General Pump, for an extension on their special use permit. the
permit was granted by the City Council on August 16, 1988, allowing
General Pump to use a mobile office fora period of one (1) year..
The request is made to provide time to arrange for new facilities
due to office expansion caused by the addition of new jobs.
According to Shannon Willey, Zoning Administrator/Planner I., the
City was informed that the earliest date of occupancy in the new
facility is October 15, 1989. General Pump is respectively
requesting an extension to the permit through December 31, 1989,
to allow for any unforeseen delays.
According to staff, the City has not received any complaints
regarding this matter, and General Pump'has met, and continues to
meet, the conditions of their special use permit.
Enclosed for City Council review is a copy of the minutes
authorizing the special permit at the August 16, 1988meeting and
the original report that was prepared by sta-ff€or� Council
ongideration. This information is enclosed on pages C� through
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a special
use permit extension for General Pump allowing a four (4) month
extension for their temporary mobile office.
l0S
I2_F-if) °; 4Z
Page 27/CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
August 16, 1988
Wachter moved, Egan seconded, the motion
preliminary plat entitled Suncrest Addition to
1988, City Council meeting, to allow staff and
review the stovepipe lots. All voted in favor.
EAGAN V. CARLSON
to continue the
the September 19,
the developer to
Egan moved, McCrea seconded, the motion to approve authorization
of payment in the amount of $16,993.00 to finalize the Eagan v.
Carlson case. All voted in favor.
SPECIAL PERMIT FOR GENERAL PUMP TO LOCATE A MOBILE OFFICE UNIT ✓
Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve a
one-year special permit for General Pump to locate a mobile office
unit at 3380 Highway 149, to be used as a temporary office until
August 15, 1989. All voted in favor.
CLIFF LAKE CENTRE SIGN PLAN
The developer outlined the new plans for the signs.
Councilmember Wachter stated he felt the trees had disappeared.
The developer stated only the poor trees were removed.
Mayor Ellison asked for a description of the materials used in
the signs. The developer stated they would be constructed of metal
and brick.
Councilmember McCrea asked Mr. Runkle how much extra signage
does the proposal ask for compared to what is allowed. Mr. Runkle
stated they were meeting the intent of the ordinance.
Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the Cliff
Lake Centre master sign plan. All voted in favor.
Councilmember McCrea stated she was bothered by the "variance"
language in the proposal. She felt it may be interpreted as a
precedent. -
PROPOSAL FOR MEDIAN CUT AND COUNTY ROAD 30/BLACKHAWK PLAZA PROJECT
City Administrator Tom Hedges stated that SEH opposed the
proposal.
_A representative of Blackhawk Plaza outlined the submitted
report and the letters. He stated they were stymied because
prospective developers would not buy without a median cut. He stated
there were few tenants in the mall because of the lack of the cut. He
sited June 5th minutes encouraging access from Highway 30.
CITY OF EAGAN
SUBJECT: SPECIAL PERMIT
APPLICANT: GENERAL PUMP
LOCATION: 3380: HIGHWAY 149
EXISTING ZONING: LIMITED INDUSTRIAL
DATE•OF PUBLIC HEARING: AUGUST 16, 1988
DATE OF REPORT: AUGUST 8, 1988
REPORTED BY: PLANNING;DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY
The 'applicant, General Pump, is requesting a special permit to
locate a mobile office unit at 3380 Highway 14.9 to be used as a
temporary office.
COMMENTS
Due to the expansion of their business, General Pump is planning
on remodeling and/or expanding their present offices and would
Pike to have a 12 'ft. x 50 ft. trailer put on their property to
be used as a temporary office for minimum of four months and a
maximum of eight months. The trailer will be located near the
northwest corner of the ex-isting building.
If approved, the special permit shall be subject to the following
conditions:
1. Building plans must be submitted and meet all applicable
state building codes and a City building permit shall be
obtained.
2. The trailer must meet the setback and lot coverage
requirements and all other applicable code requirements.
3. Decora•ti've skirting must be installed around the base of the
trailer.
4. The permit shall be l'i'mited to two years.
07
L476�7Tvtj
ZoFJ10U
PARKING, LOT
GENERAL PUMP U.S.
3360 HWY 199
/ EG,ANMN
75121
O
OVER HEAD VIEW
V=50
❑ o fel°1 1 ❑
FRONT VIEW
„=2p'
GENERAL PUMP U.5.
I DETACHED OFFICE LOCATION
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENTM_INIATURE GOLF COURSE FOR TEE TIME
F. Special Use Permit Amendment for Tri -Land Partnership of Eagan
for a Miniature Addition to their Tee Time in Eagan Driving Range-
-At the March 21, 1989 City Council meeting Tri -Land Partnership
of Eagan was granted a special use permit to allow a golf driving
range on an Outlot within the Lexington South PD. As a condition
of approval, licensing of this use is required and the City amended
the code to reflect this at the June 6 meeting.
According to City Planner Jim Sturm, the Department of Community
Development has received a request to amend the special use permit
to allow a miniature golf area. Since this use was not included
with the original application or with the licensing regulations,
City Council action is required.
The 10,000 square foot miniature golf area would be immediately
south of the rental building and west of the driving range area.
The parking lot could be expanded in the future if the need arises.
No site grading will occur as the prefabricated facility sits on
top of the previously graded and seeded area. As a condition of
this amendment, no parking should be permitted on Patrick Road.
For a copy of a letter requesting the amendment and specific site
location, refer to the attachments on pages through
ACTION TO HE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an
amendment to the special use permit to allow a miniature golf area
in addition to the driving range.
`\ O
4A\
June 6
TRI -LAND COMPANIES
Mr. Jim Sturm
Eagan City Hall
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: TEE TIME IN EAGAN
Dear Jim:
Towne Centre Professional Bldg.
Suite 202
1260 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan. MN 55121
612-452-7850
"Tee Time In Eagan" has been open officially for 1 1/2 weeks. We
have had tremendous response with a great deal of positive
feedback. Specifically, many of our patrons have been inquiring
as to whether or not we are planning to install a miniature golf
course. Evidently; most of our patrons live in the area and have
younger children and the comment has been made that they would
very much enjoy being able to bring the children with them to
play miniature golf while they use the driving range facilities.
Therefore, at this time, we would like to install a miniature
golf facility on the same property just west of the existing tee
line. I have enclosed a sketch of the area that would be the
miniature facility for your information. This facility would be
lighted and it would be an 18 hole miniature course. The minia-
ture course would be completely fenced for security purposes.
We would like to have this facility open for the 4th of July.
Would you please contact me if I need to have council approval
for these plans?
V ruly yours.
aron K. Swenson
SKS:alr
Enclosure
C
4
r
c
Ir
0
r 4
109
/.
/ [P.AN
S�
pDDIT10N
r
CP'F� 0
-4 r It
G i
0
a--ZA
70,
L{'%'I.N aTPri - n'ZGFE / !IE'L OND A%DI, +�07J
��C=~L4T OUT LOT A `
irk
m
0
0
4
Rovlpem_ ..:C:.`. PREIMNGRY GRADING; DRAINAGE. p NEv,WvcuWm
r 5��,� ERD'MN'CONtROI l Utllt T'PLAM tlli{Arp wAK9iol O IAGaM •n.[m [r�Yn Aww
r EADMN CENTER' 3RD ADDITION ^ ^"' �••� ��.� .
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989, City Council Meeting
REVIEW DESIGN ALTERNATIVE/STERNS ADDN
G. Review Design Alternatives (Sterns Addition - Streets) --At the
June 6 Council meeting, the public hearing was held 'and the
installation of streets and utilities to service the Sterns
Add'it'ion under Project 561 was approved. However, during that
public hearing presentation, there were questions and concerns
regarding the design of the entrance roadway from, Dodd Road
pertaining to the scope and extent of center medians through the
first intersection/entrance to the school. Although the project
was approved at that public hearing, the Council requested that
various design alternatives be prepared addressing the advantages
and disadvantages of each for further discussion and consideration
at the June 20 Council meeting.
The School District as well as the two developers affected by this
design were contacted and informed to attend the June 20 meeting
to represent their po itions regarding these design alternatives.
Enclosed on pages through l'l is a report from the consulting
engineer presenting different design alternatives with comments
regarding each. These will be discussed in further detail at the
Council meeting in hopes of determining a final acceptable design
so that the preparation of detailed plans and specifications can
proceed in a timely manner.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a design
associated with the street construction for Contact 89-16 (Sterns
Addition).
�`3
sonestroo
Rosene
Anderiik &
Assoctates
Engineers $ Architects
June 13, 1989
city of Eagan
9830 pilot Knob Road
Eagan, HN ,35122
Attar Mr. Thomas Colbert
Res Sterns Addition
project No. 561
Our File No. 49468
Dear Tom,
aspen W. Ikxhe. PL
josto C AMWK, Pa-
@q$3M A. LUnIt$ le,
Vfto UNmar. P.I
root$E. NV^ P.l.
ftten 6. Wm m P.E.
M~ L. Wf4d, P.E.
lM A Daman: RB.
WU,O W P9,@e P,E
Ow"6 C ewpit P.B.
Mary A N%MW, PE.
pp K rW P.W.
Vkho T. Ihwnann P!
IEOen t PktMt, PE
Dao 0 Lose , Pr
??WWI W Pee1w, ►E
hwhw c. WF4% RE.
Jarha$ R MWar10. P.B.
Pyhrielh'P: AN -900 6 P1
V.jM A..Z tffW N.Ps,
Merz 1, left P.l.
Ream C NgWk. AAA.
nh"r Il Anes P1.
Npwro A Unlan PC
Da,ied 1. IdrHan, P.,.
M1ni A, U% PE.
PhWP.,j ca$wel,►d.
M.r, D: WILL P1.
meow$ t. Ahpena, AAA.
61y P. "Mom. P1.
CMnv$ A. IAewaA
119 M,Pawepa'
~ K mn.
!y$aA M: SWIM C.PA.
The center median constructed Lto the driveway entrance serving Pinewood Ele-
mentary LSChool and' the future development to the north has advantages and
disadvantages. Based an recent discussions with Arnie Erhart (City of Eagan
Street Superintendent), Bob Engstrom (Robert Engstrom Companies)„ Gloria Rea
(Director of Transportation Rosemount School District), Jerry Bertsch (Pine-
wood Elementary School Supervisor of Construction Rosemount School 'D'i'strict),
and Gary Rylander (BRA Traffic Engineer). We have listed the advantages and
disadvantages.
Advantages:
1.) A center median would allow left turn lanes to be constructed which pro-
vides for a safer intersection from a traffic standpoint. Discussion with
Gloria flea indicated that of 28 school bus accidents which occurred last year,
12 were non -preventable. The non -preventable accidents all included rear and
collisions into school buses which were stopped waiting to make a left turn.
Therefore, these accidents would.not'have occurred if left turn lanes e:ieted..
2.) A center median constructed to the intersection and beyond will reduce
head on collision@ because they separate the traffic.
5.) Center medians do provide additional green space and identification to a
neighborhood. This benefit can be translated to increase value for the area.
4.) It can be argured that center medians are safer for pedestrians because
they provide a break for the pedestrians crossing traffic.
Page 1.
28
2335 West Highway 36 • St..Paul, Minnesota 55113ty 612-636-4600
11 (`T►
Disadvantaaese
1..) The City of Sagan does not maintain the green area within center
medians,. Therefore the development must maintain the green area which may or
may not be desirable.
2.) Plantings in the median especially at intersections must be done
carefully not to restrict eight distance. In 'addition as tress become older
and Larger, especially pines, the base can encroach into the street.
3..) Center medians do not complicate anovploving provided the traffic lanes
are a minimum 18'vide vhicb is the standard snow plow width in Sagan.
However, at intersections they do require add'i'tional work because the snow
must be removed separately from the other work.
4°.) Center medians and left turn lanes at intersections are for the most part
constructed with traffic signals or 4 -way stops. Therefore,, .if traffic sig-
nals or 4-vay stops are not constructed, center medians may complicate or add
confusion to an intersection because the intersection becomes so large.
S.) Center medians are more costly and may be difficult in dealing with
future street reconstruction and assessments. In addition, the street right-
of-way must be greater, therefore removing additional land for development.
6.) It can be argued that center medians are -not safe for pedestrian traffic
because they require a greater distance for pedestrians crossing traffic.
In summary, it is anticipated traffic volumes at this intersection will never
require left turn lanes,'center medians, .or traffic signals. However, this
does not mean the turn lanes, and medians can't be constructed and function.
properly. If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Yours very truly.,
SONESTROO, ROSENE,
ANDEEnI& 6 ASSOCIATES, INC -
Mark A. Hanson 110
MAHsli
Page 2.0
28
Ili
6
--
I
1 \l
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
Y; .gt1f88
CODIFICATION OF 1989 CITY CODE AMENDMENTS
A. Codification of 1989 City Code Amendments --Each year the City
Clerk and City Attorney meet with Roger Jensen of Municipal
Ordinance Codifiers for the purpose of codifying all ordinances
that are adopted by the City Council since the last codification
occurred. Periodically, legislation is adopted that changes
certain language within the City code requiring codification. For
a list of those ordinances that were adopted since summer of 1988,
refer to the attached memo prepared by the Director of Finance on
page Arg -
Three (3) City code amendments were adopted at the June 6 City
Council meeting that included 1) licensing golf driving ranges, 2)
redefinition of street or highway, and 3) regulating the parking
of trucks:, trailers and commercial vehicles, and will be included
in the ordinance codification that is considered during the summer
of 1990.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
codification of the 1989 City code amendments..
MEMO TO: CITY
HEDGES
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VAN OVERBEKE
DATE: JUNE 13, 1989
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE CODIFICATION
Representatives of the City Clerk's office, the City Attorney',s
office and Municipal Ordinance Codifiers met recently to review
1988 and early 1989 ordinances adopted by the City, as well as
ordinances proposed to keep the City Code in compliance with state
law.
The City had previously adopted the following ordinances in this
time period:
Number Description
66
Development Standards (Bricks or Better)
67
Clarification of Certificate of Survey
68
Subdivision/Platting Requirements
69
Multiple Ownership for On -Sale Beer and Wine
70
Fencing Swimming Pools
71
Refuse/Recycling
72
Refuse/Recycling
73
Mayor and City Council Salaries
74
Model Homes
75
Electrical Inspections
76
Accessory Housing
77
Subdivision Application Process
78
Diffley Frontage Road Parking
79
Massage Parlor Licensing
Fina a Director/City Clerk
cc: Liz Witt;, Administrative Assistant
EJV,/ j;eh
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
REZONING/RINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION S PRELIMINARY PLAT
B. Rezoning for Kings Wood 4th Addition/Horne Development
Corporation of 3.05 Acres and a 1.73 R-3/PD to an R-1 District and
a Preliminary Plat Consisting of S Single Family Lots --A public
hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at the May 23,
1989 meeting to consider a plan development amendment for 1.73 R-
3 acres within the Blackhawk Park plan development and 3.1 AG acres
to an R-1 district and a,preliminary plat entitled Kings Wood 4th
Addition consisting of eight (8) lots located on the 4.8 acres.
The APC is recommending approval of both, the rezoning and the
preliminary plat.
For additional information on both the rezoning and preliminary
plat, refer to the staff report, copies enclosed on pagesL
through
For a copry3 to{p the APC minutes on this item, refer to pages AX
through �_—'-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve
rezoning of 3.05 agricultural acres and 1.73 R-3/PD
1 district,, and 21) a preliminary plat consisting
single family lots.
V ---Lo
or deny 1) the
acres to an R-
oc eight (8)
SUBJECT: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (REZONING)
PRELIMINARY"PLAT (KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION)
APPLICANT: JAMES HORNE
LOCATION,: NE 1/4 OF SECTION 21
EXISTING ZONING: AG (AGRICULTURAL) i R-3 (TOWNHOUSE) WITHIN
THE BLACKHAWK PARR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: MAY 23� 1989
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 17,# 1989
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APPLICATION SUMMARY: Applications have been submitted requesting
a Planned Development Amendment (Rezoning) of 1.73 R_-3 acres within
the Blackhawk Park Planned Development and 3.1 AG (Agricultural)
acres to an R-1, (Single Family) district and a Preliminary Plat
consisting of eight lots located on these 4.8 acres between Cutters
Ridge Additions and I -35E. This plan, as submitted, is in
conformance with the City's Land Use Plan that designates this area
D -II (Mixed Residential, 0-6 units per acre).
EXISTING CONDITIONS/SITE PLAN: This site was previously rough -
graded and the house pad elevations have been established in hopes
that the street utility improvements will occur concurrently with
the Kings Wood 2nd Addition project. Final plat for that
subdivision is anticipated in the near future. This eight lot
subdivision calls for a roadway extension (Kings Crest) directly
west of Cutters Lane. The site is surrounded by I -35E and R-1 land
except for the Townhouse area within the Blackhawk Park Planned
Development to the south. An Outlot containing 55,018 sq. ft. acts
as a buffer to that area. It will be developed as Single Family
lots when Rocky Lane is extended west from the Cutters Ridge
additions.
The lots vary in size from 13,621 sq. ft. to 20,443 sq.. ft. A 50'
building setback is required from I -35E on lots 3 and 4. This gives
those lots a rather small building pad location, however, they are
buildable. The overall gross density is .44 units per acre and the
net density is .36 units per acre.
PARK CONCERNS: This subdivision shall be subject to a cash parks
dedication fee.
�D--k
GRADING/DRAINAGE/.EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposed cuts up to 23' in
depth. The initial grading has been completed at the time of the
drafting of this report. No retaining walls are proposed as a part
of this plan. All proposed grading is confined within the
boundaries of the proposed development. All slope areas will have
to meet the City's 31 slope requirements.
Most site generated storm water runoff drains to the intersection
of Cutters Lane and Kings Wood Road where it will be picked up by
catch basins then conveyed by pipe northerly to Pond JP -5. Pond
JP -5 is a designated ponding area in the City of Eagan's
Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan.
A preliminary erosion and sediment control plan was submitted as
a part of this application. The following erosion and sediment
control recommendation should be implemented by the developer
before final plat approval, if not sooner:
1. The site should be seeded and mulched before utility
construction starts.
2. The catch basin at the intersection with Cutters Ridge should
be protected from sediment deposition.
I. The streets of Cutters Ridge should be protected from mud
tracking. The use of rock access paths minimizes the effects
of the construction traffic.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity
is available near the intersection of Cutters Lane and Kings Wood
Road. The development is proposing to utilize this connection and
serve the entire site by gravity flow. An existing 6" water main
is also located near the same intersection and is readily available
for hookup and is adequate for serving the entire development.
Water pressure for this development will range approximately from
65-70 P.S,.I, at the proposed first floor elevations.
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access to this
development is readily available from the existing street
intersection of Cutters Lane and Kings Wood Road.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS: The development will be required
to provide appropriate street right-of-way and utility easements
for those public utilities constructed outside of public right-of-
way. All regulatory agency permits shall be acquired within the
appropriate time frame as required by the affected agency.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS• The City is awaiting collection
for the
following improvements:
ROJ I DESCRIP.TIO
RATE OIIANTITY
AMOUNT
512 Sanitary Sewer Lateral 18.60/ff 170 ff
$3,165
512 Water Lateral
7.52/ff 170 ff
1,279
512 Storm Sewer Lateral
2586/a 2 Ac.
5,172
TOTAL
$9"616
Based upon the study of the
financial obligations collected in the
past and the uses proposed
for the property the following
charges
Are proposed. The charges
are computed using the City's,
existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to the City's
utility system based on the
submitted plans.
ROJ # DESCRIPTION
RATE QUANTITY
AMOUNT
NONE
��3
RINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION CONDITIONS'
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1;, B2„ B3-, Cl, C2, C3, C5„ D1, and El.
\ a4
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
I. This development shall accept its additional assessment
obligations as defined in the staff's report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding,, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and'
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right -of' -way
.and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
ad'j'acent roadways as required by the appropriate
jur-isdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2.. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financ,ia,l guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
\aS
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
5. All internal public and private streets shall be
constru,eted within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Imarovements
1. If any public improvements are to be ins-talled under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action ,prior to final plat approval.
E. Peruits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by .the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard p.latting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory
Planning Commission
City
Council
Approved: August
25 1987
September
15,,, 1987,
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
Loe.,&Tfcp�%►
zRO f-.j,146JG
G to talc `F�,Y�O*j
111 MRI IPI V I
PPR.
1
i RB
PARKI •�
t` /
J _ IIJ
I I3
REVISED 12-1-88
w
lG4LL a:ull.,la,
wr �. .r. M w4� la. �.� yyfl �,•r� ��..
... •w..M r...�r n.. way.
0
0
TYPICAL LAT LAYOUT
1O W
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION I A
t;•_ �`••• a •-- —� a .�..r— NORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRELIMINARY VW
tir EAOAN M M SODA j
REC!_.VE8 r29
..�:;• a ,%
.. '>.._ 'G
_ F ....�
—
`
I
Cor
`:1, •`°;_
I
yf e ••w
\
I
w,
4
lG4LL a:ull.,la,
wr �. .r. M w4� la. �.� yyfl �,•r� ��..
... •w..M r...�r n.. way.
0
0
TYPICAL LAT LAYOUT
1O W
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION I A
t;•_ �`••• a •-- —� a .�..r— NORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRELIMINARY VW
tir EAOAN M M SODA j
REC!_.VE8 r29
4
13,o KINGS WOOD 4TH
• QE
.A
ar. nry me
�
.
• . n
2
cA
y, ury wn
��
I
ti
a N i aw. vw.rve
WO .
�_
rA
Y'
[ .'.wi.ae•."«e �:+ a
nn ul. wn r M
=/ `O
�,
•� nry wa
[r�r..n. •i
aA
I
NI
A�
n
s w•, An r.D
a..v
�o a
•lN3
-M142
920
I
/
-
_
r.i.
I
91_0
i
fl\Sr R[V.
i�
.1
M
..y a
\f V•T
•�
2M
__
_
_
_M
l90an
—
_
-07.9--
A.D=
1 ti
n.Di
sFNELIMIN4MTr
— •=•
••
—==""'-- _
—�
�•riei�•—•-�••-•-
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION
z
c
•[
-' Q -A(8.._-.—`
1 pet I1Tee
.^-•
,. • in'w�
HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
EAGAN . M004WTA
UTILITY FLAN
rro. rano .a..[
-- _�
3
.^A.r
D
�O
ro. w.n
z
w •nm
. r
I°
unr
p
nwml.
a
vin.�wwirl.Msrt
n
/NCS.
14
W� w
sm;
43
• tai,
y Lalr.ufr[D
\�
\9
•'. \ e....mn �
�r•9n llll.
' a
f]
we
]
B
1 ...
1
NGS
01
D
E 0
T
-
•
`
KING
00 POIN rE
1
eeo
a
..
1
870
am
!
E
KI 4GS.
Noob
ROA
ew
_
••
-
__;
-:--=_ _
�i�•�'--��'
^^rte-�-�H-
_'
—W �
�.. 3f•`~w"�"
KINGS WOOD 4TH ADDITION
HORNE 11EVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ECGIH. MHHESOT•
a•a
yD
IMINWA""'D•" � ••
PFELIMINARY STREET PLAN
_...:
3
F
_
_ .M
-T.1•..
FeI••
Page 4/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 1989
Commissionmember Hoeft questioned the mechanics of the parcel
split and combinations. Mr. Sturm explained the process.
Trygg moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a waiver of plat in order to convey a portion of
Lot 5, Wilderness Retreat Addition, to Lot 20, Lakewood Hills
Addition located in the northeast quadrant of Cliff Road and Lakewood
Bills Road in the southeast quarter of Section 26, as requested by
Russell E. Grimmer, subject to the following conditions:
1. Both properties owned by the Ruds, Parcels 052-00 and 210-00,
shall be combined into one tax parcel and recorded with the County
within sixty (60) days of City Council action.
2. Parcel B shall be combined with Lot 20 of the Lakewood Hills
Addition and recorded with the County within sixty (60) days of City
Council_ action.
All voted in favor.
BORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION - BINGSHOOD 4TH ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding a rezoning
of 3.05 Agricultural acres and 1.73 Townhouse Residential/Planned
Development acres to a Single Family district and a preliminary plat
consisting of eight single family lots located west of Cutter's Lane
in the northeast quarter of Section 21.
City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the applications and presented
the existing conditions and site plan to the Commission.
James Horne (developer) informed the Commission that the 50 -foot
setback requirement along the interstate would cause a hardship. Mr.
Sturm stated that a variance would be needed. Mr. Borne explained
that the slope is steep which would cause a problem. Mr. Sturm
advised that the matter could be handled at the Council level.
Commissionmember Trygg questioned the future roadway route. Mr.
Sturm outlined the route. Commissionmember Voracek asked if there was
no intent to bring the Kingswood Road to Rocky Lane. Mr. Sturm
responded he was correct.
Mr. Voracek asked if the clarification of the site grading was
completed. Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch explained it had
been handled through the grading permit for the previous addition.
Mr. Borne clarified the history of the grading compromise.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and approve a rezoning of 3.05 Agricultural acres and 1.73
Townhouse Residential/Planned Development acres to a Single Family
1 53
Page 5/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 1989
district, located west of Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of
Section 21, as requested by James Borne for the Kingswood 4th
Addition. All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of 8 single family lots located west of
Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of Section 21 as requested by
James Borne for the Kingswood 4th Addition, subject to the following
conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C51 D1 and E1.
2. A variance is required regarding the 50 -foot setback along
the interstate, said variance requirement to be determined by staff.
All voted in favor.
ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES - THE WOODLANDS THIRD ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regaraing a rezoning
of 2.54 Agricultural acres to a Single Family district ano a
preliminary plat consisting of 37 Single Family lots on 19.5 total
acres (16.96 acres currently zoned R-1) located at the northeast
corner of Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of
Section 14.
City Planner Jim Sturm presented an application summary ana the
site plan to the Commission. Be informeo the Commission that an
adjoining property owner wished to purchase a portion of the plat
which would require a parcel split before the item proceeoea through
to final plat.
Boward Kyllo (developer) commented that a possible solution to
the substandard lot would be to require a sixty -foot setback. Be
reported that the reason for the land sale to the adjoining owner was
to preserve the trees and also because the existing home was 15-20
feet from the property line.
Chairman Pawlenty had questions regarding the handling of the
parcel split and asked if the action was properly noticed. City
Attorney Mike Dougherty responded that the action had been properly
noticed. City Planner Jim Sturm stated a waiver could be recommended
to the Council and an additional condition could be added requiring
the recording of the lot split prior to the final plat.
Commissionmember Gorman had questions regarding the northwest
area. Mr. Borne stated it was a private preserve.
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT/WOODLANDS 3RD ADDITION
C. Rezoning, the Woodlands 3rd Addition/Robert Engstrom Companies
of 2.5,4 Agricultural to an R-1 District and a Preliminary Plat
Consisting of 37"Single Family Lots on 19.5 Acres --A public hearing
was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their May 23, 1989
meeting to consider an application for rezoning of 2.54 acres from
A to R-1 and a preliminary plat of 19,.54 acres called Woodlands 3rd
Addition. The APC is recommending approval.
For additional information, refer to the staff report, copies
//n
enclosed on pages f� through /Sz.
For a copy jof the APC action on this item, refer to pages Vii-
-1
through -U-
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny 1) the
rezoning of 2.54 acres from A to R-1, and 2) a preliminary plat of
19.54 acres called the Woodlands 3rd Addition containing 37 lots.
1-2�'
CITY OF EAGAN.
SUBJECT: REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT
WOODLANDS THIRD ADDITION.
APPLICANT: ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES
LOCATION: BE 1/4 OF SECTION 14
EXISTING ZONING: AGRICULTURAL AND SINGLE FAMILY
DATE OF PUBLIC: HEARING: MAY 23, 1989
DATE OF REPORT: MAY 150 1989
COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY •DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENTS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
An application has been submitted requesting a Rezoning of 2.54
acres from A (Agricultural) to R-1 (Single Family) and a
Preliminary Plat of 19.54 acres, called the Woodlands 3rd Addition,
containing thirty-seven lots.
EBIBTING CONDITIONS
This site is located directly east of The Woodlands and Woodland
Trail, south of The Woodland"s,.west of South Hills 1st Addition,
and north of Wescott Road. This site has been rough graded and is
primarily flat with a low spot between Bayberry Lane and Linden
Lane. The proposed 3rd Addition is in conformance with the 1988
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
BITE PLAN
The Woodlands 3rd Addition (formerly outlot G, The Woodlands),
which abuts South Hills 1st Addition• and Wescott Road, also
includes the 2.54 acres to be rezoned to R-1. The total 19.54
acres will include thirty-seven lots. The lots range in size from
12,750 square feet to 55,250 square feet. The average lot size for
this project is 19,956 square feet, well above the 12,000 square
foot minimum lot size requirement. All but lot 22, block 1, meet
or exceed the 8'5'' minimum lot width requirement. A minor
relocation of the lot line between lots 22 and 23, block 1,, will
correct this situation.
Access to the three cul-de-sacs, Bayberry Lane, Linden Lane, and
Linden Court, is ,from the existing Woodland Trail. Linden Lane is
in excess of the 5001 maximum cul-de-sac length and shall require
approval for this length. It should be noted that only twenty=four
lots are served from Linden Lane and Court. Linden Court has been
designed in a unique, hammerhead style. Four lots have double
frontage along Linden Court and Wescott Road. Cul-de-sac islands,
will be planted with native vegetation similar to those existing
in The Woodlands Addition and Chatterton Ponds. . A homeowners
association is responsible 'for the care and maintenance of these
islands. The existing planted berm along Wescott would be extended
east to incorporate theadditional frontage gained with the 2.54 -
acre parcel. The existing curb cut located along Wescott which
services the 2.54 acre lot will be removed and a full curb will be
installed. Due to triple frontage on lot 37, block 1, inherent
setback restrictions should be noted.
71
GRADING/DRAINAGE/EROSION CONTROL: The preliminary grading plan
submitted as a part of this application proposes cut and fill areas
ranging from 5' to approximately 10' respectively. The rough
grading was completed with the initial Woodlands development
proposal. All proposed grading is confined within the boundaries
of the proposed development and all slope areas will have to meet
the City's 3:1 slope, requirements. An internal storm sewer system,
is proposed to handle the storm water runoff. The proposed storm
sewer pipe will connect to the existing pipe near the intersection
of Woodland Trail and the proposed Bayberry Lane. The storm water
is then conveyed by pipe in a southerly direction and drains into
Pond JP -19, south of Wescott Road. It will be a requirement of
this development to provide ,a storm sewer outlet for Pond JP -39.
Both Ponds JP -19 and JP -39 are designated ponding areas in the City
of Eagan's Comprehensive Storm Sewer Plan. A preliminary erosion
and sediment control plan was submitted as a part of this
application.
UTILITIES: Sanitary sewer service of sufficient depth and capacity
is available near the intersections of proposed Bayberry Lane and
Linden Lane with Woodland Trail. The development is proposing to
utilize these existing sewer stubs and gravity drain the entire
proposed development. No additional sanitary sewer lines will be
required to serve any abutting property. 6" water stubs are also
existing at the _same locations and is readily available for hookup
and is adequate for serving the entire development. Water pressure
for the development will range, approximately from 70-75 P.S.I. at
the proposed first floor elevations.
Page Two
STREETS/ACCESS/CIRCULATION: Public street access to this
development is readily available from the existing Woodland Trail
which has direct access to Wescott Road. It will be required by
this development to remove the existing concrete driveway and curb
entrance located at the southeast corner of the proposed
development lying on the north side of Wescott Road. It will be
replaced with the same concrete curb section as existing on Wescott
Road. Bayberry Lane and existing Briarwood Lane are required to
have the same intersection point with Woodland Trail.
The development is required to make modifications to the turn
around at the south end of Linden Lane so maintenance and public
safety vehicles can adequately maneuver the turn.
EASEMENTS/RIGHT-OF-WAY/PERMITS• The development will be required
to provide appropriate street right-of-way and utility easements
for those public utilities constructed outside of public right-of-
way. The development Vill be required to provide the appropriate
ponding easements for JP -39 and JP -12.
All regulatory agency
permits shall be acquired
within the
appropriate time frame
as required by the affected agency.
FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS•
The City is awaiting collection
for the
following improvements:
RP OJ !
RATE QUANTITY
AMOUNT
494 Lateral Benefit
Sanitary
Sewer Trunk
30.12/ff 132 ff
$ 3,976
494 Water Trunk
1,250/a 1.88 a
2,350
494 Lateral Benefit
Water
Trunk
6.24/ff 132 ff
824
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .053/sf 33,000 sf
1,360
494 Wescott Road
30.99/ff . 132 ff
4,091
TOTAL
$14,349
Based upon the study of
the financial obligations collected
in the
past and the uses proposed for the property, the following
charges
are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's
existing
fee schedule and connections proposed to be made to
the City's
utility system based on
the submitted plans.
ROJ # DESCRIPTIO
RATE QUANTITY
AMOUNT
494 Storm Sewer Trunk .056/sf 48488 sf
$ 2,710
494 Wescott Road
14.50/ff 384.'22.ff
5,571
TOTAL
$ 8,289
As a condition of plat
approval the objection to the
assessment
should be withdrawn and
the assessments agreed to, i.e.
see the
pending amounts referenced.
CONDITIONS:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adoptedby
Council action on 'September 15, 1987 shall be complied with:
Al, B1, B2, B3, B9, Cl,. C2, C3, C5, D1, and E1.
2. Lot 22, block 1 shall be designed to meet the 85' minimum
width at the setback.
3. A landscape plan shall 'be submitted for the center cul-de-sac
islands.
4. The cul-de-sac length shall be approved as per plat.
5:. The development is required to provide the appropriately
sized storm sewer outlet to Pond TP -39,.
6. The development is required to remove the existing concrete
drive and replace the curb cut previously provided to
Parcel 020-78.
7. Modifications to the proposed turn around area at the
southerly end of Linden Lane are required to address
concerns relating to City maintenance, public safety
vehicles,, and utility service.
A.
B.
C.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
Assessments
1. This development shall accept its additiona-1 assessment
obligations as defined in the staff `'s report in
accordance with the final plat dimensions, and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
Easements and Rights -of -Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10' drainage and utility
easements centered over all common lot lines and adjacent
to private property or public right-of-way.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially
guarantee its proportionate share of the acquisition
costs of additional drainage, ponding, and utility
easements as required by the alignment, depth, and
storage capacity of all required public utilities and
streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat or
-outside of dedicated public right-of-way as necessary to
service this development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way
and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of
adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate
jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and
ponding easements to incorporate the required high water
elevation necessitated by City storm water storage volume
requirements.
Plans and Specifications
1. All public streets and utilities necessary to provide
service to this development shall be designed by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City
codes and engineering standards and policies, and
approved by staff prior to final plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment
control plan must be prepared in accordance with current
City standards and approved by staff prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall insure that all temporary dead end
public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in
accordance with City engineering standards.
4. A detailed landscape plan shall be submitted on the
proposed grading plan and approved by staff prior to the
final plat approval. The financial guarantee shall be
included in the Development Contract and not released
until one year after the date of installation.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
PAGE TWO
S. All internal public and private streets shall be
constructed within the required right-of-way in
accordance with City design standards.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any public improvements are to be installed under a
City contract, the appropriate project must be approved
by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition
of all regulatory agency permits in the time frame
required by the affected agency.
F. Parks Dedication
1. This development shall fulfull its parks dedication
requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks and
Recreation Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Other
1. All standard platting and zoning conditions shall be
adhered to unless specifically granted a variance by
Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15 1987
Revised:
LTS#2
STANDARD
G oe rrl o,^d
Z.of,j 1 f4 G
NEkd/
1L-OTTd
n r[sd IN
-L1 CM CqL— rt�
�L
I'
CARRIILLr
+
NW NILS LO[!
'iioen -. _: NE
NW
Si sii i___.
LOURS!
J
�al,
_..
• 4�Cw
/fJ sI
f "14
f7n!/I SW
5 �
�fY
H LA �t is
C.
NEkd/
N
' OOIC'..'
EOYII SE .
-L1 CM CqL— rt�
�L
I'
GOLF
UIINII❑
511, 19
d
N
.MI
rk Yl,
LIA
J
JdSC- TH[
NCI
/S'S�C �'II�• .
,y r' ROR[RT
[HGSTR[
COMM
.O AT M.. 7 ,
JAMES A. HILL, INC.
SHEET 5 OF 3 SHEETS /
THE WOODLANDS
-.1M9 SPIbS
�1 _OW
N.
E X C E...P�T
o
a
�
r
o II
1 O U T L O T
G
o
u
I
;
11
i
FTRAtL
\
�jl
I !!t M
ss+
T
.MI
rk Yl,
LIA
J
JdSC- TH[
NCI
/S'S�C �'II�• .
,y r' ROR[RT
[HGSTR[
COMM
.O AT M.. 7 ,
JAMES A. HILL, INC.
SHEET 5 OF 3 SHEETS /
_ I=
i wwn
w jj j \
[fif0f / I TILL
t
vw ®rs
[ f t
winoom
ill R i �'i
u
ah
SL a
� 7l w LM
rr
tr �
Y _
ash
YY
{K
Y l[
- a
r9
fi R
NO�J\ 1 yr ply
�-.nom. -
alu
8.0 DP 4ft I- J.
20 8858.3 62.8 WSCO fi� HILLS N I
WE9C0TT e
CARRIAGE /
• HILLS
GOLFII E -h ` I
JJDP�I�SE
3 doop
GARpEN L P310
N882.0 -- 854./F �� JP -16 oAwoDv
-17
gJi_I{ ^, P-33 879.1 858AI
*�..r`��*JP-59 / \�• �I8540 �Tl
87/.O
,� s� " -JY-4 89.7'N O-
�16Z 2
3"J 46 8 .0 �r /N J ��\ ..r? 1 7AT88
�c�N'�
E` 2.3 I C 8 L.S.-15 55 JO -41
-2: 4-
Ar
M.IFLTeSs.o
uJP-
if3�1.' JP -31
Ve : 876.3 _ 1, B8 3$,:-
aiIST-
880.4
J -
j RpAD/ h 1{�i 21 d
IIIITy 8822 �2 � 82.0
', �. ` 6
873.0
i
SQ;IARE Je92 0 _�� s• g7Z
i. 855.6 �1� I 885
u
JP -21 L'S"I7�-w
815.3
SUBJECT PARCEL
FIG 0 1
city of eaga6 STORM SEWER approved: standard
soPUBLIC plate •:
WORKS MASTER PLAN
DEPARTMENT
P
0
C
x
M
m
z
m
0
0
0
D
r
f
MW m[1vMY, 4e N W2 OF"I Q M
�� l� NI � • f � ,�• IF \ ►1
s
xj
SUBJECT AREA
6F . r..'..
l4
neje
ORIGINAL PLAT
HLLS nRST
i;zom.w, I
MlTiz
-Mvt10113
RAT
=V,
7 5-.7
\,.'A1\' / 11
Iq
21
�'; � � I Ij I � 1 ee'\ � II'I'11 i.,�/�/./l / � `\•,
`l` \ \11 1t 1 1 1 1 afe '�'' ' t ' ! t111g1 I\' i _—� . ` I 1 •^ �►' if '
IF \. ! %
37
36
is
\ x
t
! lT2
13 tow.
TM
DrVELCIM
®\01
Page 5/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 1989
district, located west of Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of
Section 21, as requested by James Borne for the Kingswood 4th
Addition. All voted in favor.
Trygg moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to approve a
preliminary plat consisting of 8 single family lots located west of
Cutter's Lane in the northeast quarter of Section 21 as requested by
James Borne for the Kingswood 4th Addition, subject to the following
conditions:
1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1,
B2, B3, Cl, C2, C3, C5, Dl and E1.
2. A variance is required regarding the 50 -foot setback along
the interstate, said variance requirement to be determined by staff.
All voted in favor.
ROBERT ENGSTROM COMPANIES - THE WOODLANDS THIRD ADDITION
Chairman Pawlenty opened the public hearing regarding a rezoning
of 2.54 Agricultural acres to a Single Family district and a
preliminary plat consisting of 37 Single Family lots on 19.5 total
acres (16.96 acres currently zoned R-1) located at the northeast
corner of Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of
Section 14.
City Planner Jim Sturm presented an application summary anc the
site plan to the Commission. Be informed the Commission that an
adjoining property owner wished to purchase a portion of the plat
which would require a parcel split before the item proceeded through
to final plat.
Howard Kyllo (developer) commented that a possible solution to
the substandard lot would be to require a sixty -foot setback. He
reported that the reason for the land sale to the adjoining owner was
to preserve the trees and also because the existing home was 15-20
feet from the property line.
Chairman Pawlenty had questions regarding the handling of the
parcel split and asked if the action was properly noticed. City
Attorney Mike Dougherty responded that the action had been properly
noticed. City Planner Jim Sturm stated a waiver could be recommended
to the Council and an additional condition could be added requiring
the recording of the lot split prior to the final plat.
Commissionmember Gorman had questions regarding the northwest
area. Mr. Horne stated it was a private preserve.
(Sz
Page 6/EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
May 23, 19'89
Member Voracek requested an explanation of proposed condition
number 7.. Mr. Sturm responded it would ,provide for a better turning
radius for the street maintenance. Mr. Voracek asked if the three
fronted lot would be affected. The developer replieo it was —a very
workable plan.
Voracek moved, Miller seconded, the motion to close the public
hearing and to approve a rezoning of 2.54 Agricultural acres to a
Single Family district, located at the northeast corner of Wescott
Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of.Section 14, as
requested by Robert Engstrom Companies for The Woodlands 3rd
Addition. All voted in favor.
Voracek moved, Gorman seconded, the mot -i -on to approve a
preliminary ,plat consisting of 3,7 single family lots on 19.5 total
acres (16.96 acres currently zoned R-1) located at the northeast
corner of Wescott Road and Woodland Trail in the southeast quarter of
Section 14,1 as requested by Robert Engstrom Companies for The
Woodlanbs 3,rd Addition, subject to the following conditions:
1.. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by
Council action on September 15, 1987, shall be complied with: Al, B1.,
B2, B3, B41 C1, C2, C3, C5, D1, and El.
2. Lot 22, Block 1 shall be designed to meet the 85 -foot minimum
width at the setback or a 60 -foot setback shall be required.
3. A landscape plan shall be submitted for the center cul-de-sac
islands.
4. The cul-de-sac length shall be approved as per plat.
5. The development is required to provide the appropriately
sized storm sewer outlet to Pond J'P-39.
6. The development is required to remove the existing concrete
drive and replace the curb cut previously provided to Parcel 0:20-78.
7. Modifications to the proposed turn -around area at the
southerly end of Linden`Lane are.req,uired.to address concerns
relating to City maintenance, public safety vehicles and utility
service.
8. The easterly 20 feet to 30 feet of proposed Lots 31 and 32,
Block 1, may be transferred to the adjacent landowner to the east and
combined with that tax parcel, if such transfer is recorded prior to
the hearing by the Council -of final plat approval.
All voted in favor.
(0
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
D. City Code Amendment to Chapter 5 to Allow Off -Sale Liquor
Stores to be Open on January 1 and July 4 --Action was taken in this
previous legislative session to allow off -sale liquor stores to be
open on January 1 and July 4 in accordance with Chapter 4`9, 1989
laws. The _City has received requests from off -sale liquor
proprietors requesting consideration for an ordinance amendment to
allow this legislation to be effective within the City. Other
changes to Chapter 5 include definition of a minor as amended to
delete dates which are no longer applicable and subparagraph H of
subdivision 4, section 502 is amended to provide that revocation
or suspension is mandatory or in the imposition of a fine in
accordance with MSA 340A.415,. Section 5.51 is amended to add a
license fee for a temporary liquor license. If section 5.57 is not
adopted, the amendment to this section should also be stricken.
Please note that this provision provides for a daily license fee
and that section 5.57, as drafted, allows issuance for up to three
consecutive days. The City Clerk would like subdivision 6 and
subdivision 3b to be consistent regarding this matter.
Enclosed on pages / Ij through _LSJ is a draft ordinance that
makes the necessary revisions inclhding a mandatory revocation or
suspension, the daily license fee and to allow off -sale liquor
establishments to be open on July 4 and January 1.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the
changes to Chapter 5 of the'City Code as proposed.
I5�
ORDINANCE NO. , 2ND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN
CITY CODE, CHAPTER 5 ENTITLED "BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR LICENSING AND
REGULATION" BY CHANGING PROVISIONS RELATING TO DEFINITIONS,
COUNCIL ACTION ON LICENSES, LICENSE FEES4 AND HOURS AND DAYS OF
SALES; BY ADDING A PROVISION RELATING TO TEMPORARY LIQUOR
LICENSES'; AND, BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE, EAGAN CITY CODECHAPTER
1 AND SECTION 5.99 WHICH, AMONG OTHER, THINGS, CONTAIN PENALTY
PROVISIONS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EAGAN DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Eagan City. Code Section 5..01 entitled
"Definitions" is.hereby amended by changing Item'19, to read:
19. "minor" means any natural person who has not
attained the age of 21 years.
Section 2. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.02 entitled "Applications
and Licenses Under This Chapter - Procedure and Administration"
is hereby amended by changing. Subparagraph H of .Subd 4, to read,:
Subd. 4. Action.
H. Penalty. The Council shall revoke or
suspend, for a period not to exceed sixty days, a license
granted under the provisions of this Chapter or impose a
civil fine not to exceed $2,-000.00., for each violation on a
finding that the licensee has committed a violation as
defined in Subparagraph F of this Subdivision. In the event
of a revocation of a license, the licensee must reapply for
a license and meet the requirements for a license under this
Chapter. In the event that a fine imposed pursuant to this
Subparagraph is not pa-i•d within fifteen days of its
imposition by the Council, the license shall be permanently
suspended until the fine is paid.
Section 3. Eagan City Code Sec. 5..51 entitled "Liquor
License Fees'" is hereby amended by adding a Subdivision, to read.:
read,:
Subd. 6. The daily temporary liquor license fee
is $150.00.
Section 4. Eagan City Code Sec. 5.53 is hereby amended, to
SEC. 5.53. HOURS AND DAYS OF' LIQUOR SALES. Except as
otherwise provided in Section 5.54, no on -sale shall be made
after 1:00 o'clock A.M. on Sunday, nor between 12:00 o'clock
midnight and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Monday, nor between the
hours of 1:00 o'clock A.M. and 8:00 o'clock A.M. on Tuesday
through Saturday. No off -sale shall be made on Sunday nor
before 8:00 o'clock A.M. or after 8:00 o'clock P.M. of any
day, except Friday and Saturday on which days off -sale may
be made until 10:00 o'clock P.M. No off -sale shall be made
on Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day, December 25., but on
the evenings preceding such days, if the sale of liquor is
not otherwise prohibited on such evenings, off -sales may be
made until 10:00 o!clock P.M. No sale of liquor shall be
made after B.r00 o'clock P.M. on December 24.
Sect -ion 5. Eagan City Code, Chapter 5, is hereby amended by
adding a Section, to read:
SEC. 5.57. TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE.
Subd. 1. License Authorized. Notwithstanding any
provision of the City Code to the contrary,, the Council may
issue a license for the temporary on -sale of liquor in
connection with a social event sponsored by the licensee.
Such license may provide that the licensee may contract with
the holder of a full -year on -sale license, issued by the
City, for liquor catering services.
Subd. 2. Applicant. The applicant for a license
under this Section must be a club or charitable, religious,
or other non-profit organization in existence for at least
three years.
Subd, 3. Terms and Conditions of License.
A. No license is valid until approved by the
Commissioner.
B. No license shall be issued for more than
three consecutive days.
C. All licenses and licensees are subject to
all provisions of statutes and the City Code relating to
liquor sale and licensing. The licensee shall provide proof
of financial responsibility coverage and, 'in the case of
catering by a full -year on -sale licensee, such caterer shall
provide proof of the extension of such coverage to the
licensed premises.
D. Licenses may authorize sales on premises
other than those owned or permanently occupied by the
licensee.
Subd. 4. Insurance Required. The Council may,
but at no time shall it be under any obligation whatsoever
to, grant a temporary liquor license on premises owned or
controlled by the City. Any such license may be
conditioned., qualified or restricted as the Council sees
-2-
fit. If the premises to be licensed are owned or under the
control of the City, the applicant shall file with the City,
prior to issuance of the license, a certificate of liability
insurance coverage in at least the sum of $100,0.00.0:0 for
injury to any .one person, $300,000..00 for injury to more
than one person, and $25,000.00 for property damage, naming
the City as ,an insured during the license period.
Section 6. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General
Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code
Including Penalty for Violation" and Section 5.99 entitled
"Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by
reference as though repeated verbatim herein.
Section 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect upon its adoption and publication according to law.
ATTEST:
CITY OF'EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By: By:
Its: Clerk Its: Mayor
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
-3-
IS-7
Agenda Information Memo
June 20, 1989 City Council Meeting
CONT. 89-15, RECEIVE BIDS/AWARD CONT.
(ARMSTRONG BUSINESS CENTER -UTILITIES)
E. Contract 89-15, Receive Bids/Award Contract (Armstrong
Business Center - Utilities) --At 10:30 a.m. on June 19, 1989,
formal bids will be received for the installation of utilities to
service the proposed Armstrong Business Center located within the
Eagandale Industrial Park near the intersection of Apollo, Mike
Collins Drive and Lone Oak Road. The tabulation of bids received
will be included in the Additional Information packet on Monday.
All bids will be checked for accuracy and compliance with the
specification documents and any deviations will be mentioned on
June 20th. If the public hearing required for this project is
closed and the project authorized, it would be appropriate to award
the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the bids for
Contract 89-15, (Armstrong Business Center -Utilities) and award the
contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
(S9
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 158 1989
SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE
RTB NOMINATION AND AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE
Enclosed on pages —&--( through " is a copy of an action memo
from the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities requesting
nominations for the regional transit board and asking for city
officials to volunteer their time as a member of one of the AMM
committees.
In regard to the RTB nomination there are eight of the new eleven
member board that will be appointed by the Metropolitan Council.
Please note on the attached map that an appointment will be made
from this area. Since nominations are to be submitted on
Wednesday, June 21, it will be necessary to act at Tuesday's
meeting. If any member of the City Council knows of someone who
would be interested in seeking an appointment please notify this
office prior to Tuesday so that they can be contacted and added to
the administrative agenda if appropriate.
BRAUN ASSESSMENT APPEAL
The City has been notified that the Braun assessment appeal is
scheduled for court on August 25.
SENECA ORDER CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The last Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee meeting was held
on Wednesday, June 14 at the Eagan City Hall and the purpose of the
meeting was to receive a construction update from MWI/C-C� staff and
d'scuss various odor complaints. Enclosed on pages through
are copies of the May 10, 1989 minutes which also include
a copy of a statement of goals for the committee. The City
Administrator provided a letter at that meeting which provided an
accurate focus of the committee's responsibilities according to the
joint agreement.
SCHOOL DISTRICT 196/ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
School District 196 has contacted the City and is seeking a land
acquisition for the next elementary school to be located south of
Cliff Road on either Pilot Knob Road or Cliff Road.
EAGAN 4TH OF JULY PARADE
Please notify this office no later than the City Council meeting
on Tuesday evening as to whether you plan to ride in the 4th of
July parade. According to Dr. Don Clark it will be necessary that
each of you interested in riding in the parade provide your own
vehicle and driver.
59
PUBLIC MEETING/DAKOTA COUNTY INCINERATOR
On June 6 our administrative intern attended a public meeting at
the Rosemount High School sponsored by the Met Council regarding
the proposed incinerator. For a summary of what transpired at that
meeting, refer to the attachment enclosed on page _P,�X.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE
The City Administrator, Assistants to the City Administrator Duffy
and Hohenstein attended various sessions of the League of Minnesota
Cities conference that was held in Minneapolis last week. There
were a number of various sessions ranging from economic development
to sexual and racial harassment to solid waste management and
several sessions on revenue sources. Governor Perpich spoke prior
to the LMC banquet on Thursday and essentially informed cities that
truth in taxation will not work and, therefore, will not be
implemented in 1989. Regarding the impact of the veto on property
tax and local government aid there is not direction given to the
cities however we were told that specific regulations would be
forthcoming late this summer.
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS.MONTELY REPORT/MAY
Enclosed on pages 1-74 through III is a copy of the Protective
Inspections monthly report for May 1989. Please note that despite
the reduction in building permits, our permit fees are running
higher in 1989.
MISCELLANEOUS COUNTY AND STATE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS
Dakota County and MnDOT both are proposing to perform various
maintenance overlays on their jurisdictional roadways within the
City of Eagan at the following locations:
STREET TERMINI
MnDOT
T.H. 55 Mendota Bridge to South Junction of
T.H. 149 (Starks Halfway House)
Dakota Countv
County Road 43 (Lex. Ave.) Yankee Doodle Rd. to Lone Oak Rd.
In addition to these major overlay projects, both agencies will be
performing miscellaneous spot patch and repairs throughout the
community during the next 1 - 6 weeks. If any additional
information is desired on any of these projects, please let the
Director of Public Works know.
/S/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
c �t= o Icition of
il politan
kipalifies
INTO]
k� I '. I& . ff-
El i
C o R 8 E c T 1 o N
Some of the attached Bulletins mailed Tuesday, June 6, were
missing the second page, which contained important
information on application for RTB nomination and !NM
committee assignment. We apologize for any confusion or
inconvenience this may have caused. Please respond as quickly
as possible so that the Board may act at its June 29, 1,989
meeting.
Thank you.
1°9 university a Dime earl, ^t, paUI, min�esota 55101 (612) 227 1006
(-V
June 6, 1989
TO: Member City Officials
FROM: Walt Fehst, President
RE: MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES ►ND
NOMINATIONS TO THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD
1. REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB) NOMINATIONS.
Recent legislation reorganizing the Regional Transit Board
provides that of the new eleven member board, eight shall be
appointed by the Metropolitan Council one each from the
various council districts per the enclosed map. Of these
eight, at least two must be elected county officials and four
must be elected city or town officials. Various
organizations representing counties and cities, including the
AMM are required to provide the Metropolitan Council with at
least two nominations for each position.
This is a significant change from past philosophy. Recent AMM
policy called for elected official direct participation on
the Regional Transit Board. Legislators, including the
principal authors, were concerned about the dedication and
commitment of time by elected officials and only after several
strong assurances by AMM staff did they in fact establish an
PTB with a majority of elected officials.
The new RTB in addition to its previous tasks and duties, has
regional planning and approval authority over LRT. Its
responsibilities will include coordination of all transit,
approval of LRT Grants, study and provision of increased
suburban transit opportunity and overseeing a new LRT planning
advisory group.
A position on this new board will be challenging and will
require a commitment on the part of those serving to be active
participants. RTB members receive $50 per meeting not to
exceed $50 per day and parking and travel expenses. The
current board meets twice a month late Monday afternoon with
subcommittee meetings following. However, meeting day, time
and frequency will be at the discretion of the new board. The
AMM board must make nominations to the Metropolitan Council
by the last week of June.
ACTION REQUESTED
If you as an elected official or another elected official from
your city or neighboring city wishes to serve on the RTB and
can make the necessary time commitment, please indicate your
interest to AM11 President Walt Fehst or AMM staff no later
than Wednesday, June 21, 1989. Your request for nomination
should be in the form of a letter to Walt Fehst in care of the
AMM office at 183 University Ave., East, St. Paul, Minnesota
55101 and accompanied by a resume of at least your
governmental experience. Some discussion of your interest or
previous involvement in transit and transportation issues would
be helpful.
2. MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES:
THE AMM NEEDS YOUR HELP. GET INVOLVED AND BE PART OF THE AMM
POLICY PROCESS AND REPRESENT YOUR CITY'S INTERESTS.
We, as city officials, cannot afford to be silent. Please
take a few minutes to read the brief description of the five
standing policy committees (enclosed) and volunteer a small
amount of your valuable time to make an impact by filling in
and returning the attached form. The committees will meet in
August and September approximately four times each year. The
Board of Directors will be making two year appointments in late
June and would like a clear indication of all persons who are
willing to give a small part of their time and energy to serve
on one or more of these committees. The Board would also
welcome any suggestions for specific issues or concerns to
be studied by the committees. If you have questions, please
contact either Roger Peterson or Vern Peterson in the AMM
Office (227-4008).
DISTRIBUTION NOTE:
Mayor, Councilmember, Managers, and Administrators will
receive this Bulletin individually. However, if other city
employees such as finance directors, housing officers,
planners, etc. would like to serve on an AMM Committee,
please submit their names.
COMMITTEE DESCRIPTIONS:
1. METROPOLITAN AGENCIES COMMITTEE
Considers legislative issues and non -legislative issues related
to the Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Commissions. The
Committee monitors the structure and relationship between the
regional entities and local units of government and reviews
amendments to Metropolitan Development Guide Policy Chapters or
any new chapters developed. In past years, the Committee has
developed policy on land use planning, metropolitan
significance, solid waste management, Met Council selection
process, etc. It also reviewes the council's yearly budget.
2. MUNICIPAL REVENUES COMMITTEE
Considers any matter concerning revenues, taxes, and city
expenditures. Included are state aid formulas, state aid dollars,
levy limits, property tax assessments, and fiscal disparities. The
Committee will be looking very carefully at the effects of the
state aid formula and levy limit modifications as well as the new
net tax capacity rates and the balance of aids/credits between the
metro and outstate regions.
3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Concerns itself with all issues related to economic development
and housing including subsidized housing, affordable housing,
and activities of the Metropolitan HRA. Reviews all amendments
to the Metropolitan Council's Housing Guide Policy Chapter with
particular emphasis on low and moderate income housing concerns.
Will review legislation dealing with EDA's, HRAs, Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) and Development authorities.
4. GENERAL LEGISLATION COMMITTEE
Examine issues which have impact on metropolitan area cities
outside the scope of other AMM committees. In the past, this
Committee developed policy on municipal self insurance,
municipal consolidation, pensions, cable communications, PELRA
Amendments, Comparable Worth, etc.
5. TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE
Studies all major issues related to transportation and transit
at the metropolitan, state and federal levels. The ten (10)
elected officials who represent the AMM on the Transportation
Advisory Board (TAB) and the eight (8) city staff officials
who represent the AMM on the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)
are encouraged to be members of this Committee along with other
city officials.
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNCIPALITES
(Please return by not later than June 215t.)
NAME CITY POISITON
CITY
PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS
street
city zip code)
PREFERRED TELEPHONE CONTACT NUMBER
PLEASE INDICATE COMMITTEE CHOICE
T. KN -5--2 N-5-7-
Municipal Revenues
Metropolitan Agencies
Housing and Economic Development
General Legislation
Transportation
SUGGESTED ISSUES TO BE STUDIED
PLEASE RETURN TO:
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
183 University Ave., East
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Att: Carol Williams
I(eS
REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD DISTRICTS
•r 1Y•M �\
•N.• 1: V 1•Y D•.Y, ..
• e•11«fN 11 1� •.`•.••
r ;:Y .n...\ •..r, Scar
•w w a County BoundaryILLZL.. n. 1 n•n •.�\
— KAUrIPP81 BounOSry `IICT a.. ••\.• n« «.�. ..
n
.YDD
—_TownShIP Boundary
.•nr.�.0 w Iw CTOw CO
13
'q�� x•.e•c rlrrl CO ,••w., .. .1• - •Y\i1/, • �• �
�i� f'Gi1J a •IP •Du'. .-I �,[ `.� jui ai� 1
.�il- niJJJJJJ' ti. �� _- �•�' - � . }Seat � n.\I 1, .: ` _-_ _
• • xx ."s[1....1. :D•..• � .see•..• t
'• ��—,• ... , •.{. 11 \ •1 •rte ..,•
L aw,• •�•Y , {• D•••1 Y
' nw•.,.•w12 i •\� u,u11 unl �
PM
- u[e... p•••� t0 1
C.•vl• CO
eOT•
.{.•r:11• n.i• n�evq .-.. t•' 1— —� �� a I wJ•upl 01p•••1 ♦. .. r,Hn,a• �-
--------j JIr
1 14 \I.1 •�\\I I SSSS -..D. . SSSS.
�1• i ... .., •1
SCOTT c0
...IT �1`r-__-SII \.. .�• _ .1• .Ir-.
f•IDJ
D ,\ SSSS.. _. •. ..
tlo e
le •
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL OF THE TWIN CITIES AREA
vo
- -- — ---
SENECA ODOR CONTROL ADVISORY COMMITTEE
May 10, 1989
MINUTES
1�348%1AZ*] ID1317
The fourth meeting of the Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee
was called to order at 5:00 p.m., May 10, 1989, at the Eagan City
Hall. Attendees were Al Arends, Betty Bassett, Michael Hazel,
Lester Spencer and John Westley, area residents; Kristy Marnin and
Dale Runkle, City of Eagan; Jim Sheldon, McMenomy & Severson (City
attorney); and Karla Eggink, Pauline Langsdorf, Bob Polta, Harold
Voth and Jim Wawra, Metropolitan Waste Control Commission (MWCC).
II. REVIEW OF AGENDA/APPROVAL OF MINUTES
AGENDA: The agenda was accepted as distributed.
MINUTES: Bassett requested the following addition be made to her
comments as contained in the third paragraph on page three:
Bassett stated that the neighbors see no reason to be grateful for
promises made to them and therefore they cannot be expected to be
grateful for things (promises) that have not taken place yet. Th
addition, part of the plan with the City in satisfying the
neighbors' concerns was that the neighbors would be kept informed
as each of these steps (as contained in the Development Agreement)
came along and would have the opportunity to provide input
regarding these steps. Bassett continued that her main point is
that the rumors regarding the neighbors complaining are unfair.
As far as being grateful, Bassett noted that she will be happy to
write a letter in 1992 praising the MWCC if everything goes as
agreed.
The minutes of the April 12, 1989 meeting were accepted with the
above noted corrections/clarifications.
III. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
1. Committee Duties/Organization
Marnin distributed a memo from Tom Hedges to Dale Runkle, dated
May 8, 1989, regarding the role of the committee and selection of
a committee chair.
A. Selection of Committee Chair
Marnin informed the committee that no representative of the
business community has contacted the City regarding participation
on the committee although contacts have been made. Westley -stated
that he is willing to give up ,his seat as the at -large resident
representative to serve as the business community representative
Seneca odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 2
as he also works in the area. Bassett said that she feels it is
important to have a business community representative, and that
Westley could serve this function, particularly since he is a
member of the Chamber of Commerce. Runkle informed Westley that
he should submit a letter to Tom Hedges requesting this change.
Marnin stated that the committee could select a chair if it so
desired given the fact that most of the people who will be
attending the meetings regularly are present. If not, she can
continue as the committee facilitator until such time as the
committee selects a chair.
Westley indicated that having Marnin continue to serve as
facilitator would be acceptable. Bassett agreed, but noted that
whomever serves as the committee chair should not be allowed to
sway the committee to one point of view. There was no objection
voiced to having Marnin continue as committee facilitator.
B. Adoption of Statement of Goals
Marnin reviewed the draft statement of goals as distributed by
Wawra at the April 12, 1989, meeting. Marnin noted that the memo
from Tom Hedges (noted above) basically supported this draft
statement of goals. Westley commented that he would like to see
the committee "preview" information, in addition to review, in an
attempt to correct things before they become a problem. Westley
requested an additional goal for the committee of previewing
building plans. Marnin questioned whether review of building plans
was under the authority of the committee. She stated that rather
than reviewing plans as a specified goal of the committee, City
staff would provide notice to the committee members when the MWCC
applied for the building permits. Marnin added that providing
notice of building permit applications is not an ordinary City
procedure, nor is it specifically required under the Development
Agreement.
Bassett continued this discussion regarding review of the building
plans. She stated that she had heard that the plans show a
retrofitting of the building for future expansion. Bassett
questioned Sheldon as to whether this retrofitting would be in
violation of Section 3.3(c) of the Development Agreement.
Sheldon responded that it is the City's responsibility to review
building permit applications, not the committee's or other
parties'. He stated that the City and the MWCC have a contract
regarding the plant expansion. This contract is an agreement, not
a law. The City and the MWCC can agree to anything in such a
contract, provided that it does not violate the law. Citp'staff
will review the building permit application for compliance with the
Development Agreement.
Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 3
Runkle stated that the next formal action by the City Council
regarding the Seneca Plant would be the final plat approval.
Eggink noted that Section 3.3(c) of the Development Agreement, as
referenced by Bassett in this discussion, refers to the sludge
incinerator capacity, not the plant's capacity to treat wastewater.
These are two separate issues.
Hazel inquired if there was anything that controls the maximum size
of the plant. Voth responded that the current capacity of the
plant is 24 million gallons per day (mgd). The plant capacity with
the proposed expansion will be 34 mgd. Runkle noted that any
expansion beyond a capacity of 34 mgd is not covered under the
Development Agreement and would require a new Development
Agreement.
After this discussion, the statement of goals as distributed were
adopted by the committee with the addition of the word "preview"
to the second goal (statement of goals as adopted are attached to
these minutes). It was also noted for the record that these goals
may be revised as needed at future dates.
2. Compliance with Conditions, to Date
Marnin reviewed Section 3.1 of the Development Agreement and noted
when each of the required items were submitted to the committee
members. Marnin stated that all requirements of the MWCC have been
met to date.
Bassett asked about the list of health study references that were
mailed to the committee. She wanted to know about the actual
reports. Polta stated that he would make available a copy of each
of the studies. (One copy of each of the three studies is now
available for review at City Hall).
Notification Requirements
Marnin stated that the MWCC has compiled a list of interested
citizens as required in Section 6.3 of the Development Agreement.
This list includes all adjacent property owners, other area
residents and businesses, persons who spoke as interested citizens
at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings held since
August 1988 regarding the Seneca Plant, and persons who signed a
petition regarding environmental concerns related to the Seneca
Plant.
4. Enforcement
Marnin stated that the memo from Tom Hedges (noted above) affirms
(P9
Seneca odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 4
that the Community Development Department will be the responsible
department within the City for the supervision and enforcement of
the Development Agreement for the City.
V. STATUS REPORTS
1. Construction Update
Voth stated that bids for the expansion construction are scheduled
for release June 1. The current construction will be complete by
mid-June. Voth added that the final plat application has been
submitted to the City.
Eggink reviewed the chemical test feed program currently under way.
Sodium hypochlorite is being injected upstream to test its
effectiveness on odor control.
Spencer inquired as to what sodium hypochlorite smells like, and
if he would be able to smell it. Eggink responded that sodium
hypochlorite smells like household bleach. However, the tanks
containing the sodium hypochlorite are sealed and should not
release any odors.
Bassett brought up a discussion regarding contamination of the
wells in the area. Langsdorf responded that Dakota County is
researching the matter, but the MWCC has not received the County's
reports yet. Once the reports are received, the MWCC will forward
the information to the affected residents.
Bassett inquired as to when the dewatering wells would be put in.
Voth replied that the permit for the wells has been submitted to
the MPCA, but he is not certain when the approval to install the
wells will be received.
2. Odor Complaints
Polta informed the committee that one odor complaint was received
since the last committee meeting. Review of this complaint
indicated that the odor was from either the metering station or
pumping station.
Polta distributed two hand-outs regarding odor monitoring at Lift
Station 13 and Meter Station 500.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
Runkle informed the committee that representatives from Minnesota
Public Radio (MPR) had approached the City regarding installation
of radio antenna towers in the scenic easement (Outlot A, Seneca
Addition). The City informed MPR that the easement agreement
Seneca Odor Control Advisory Committee
May 10, 1989
Page 5
restricts activity in outlot A without the written authorization
of the City. Runkle added that MPR representatives may be
contacting the area residents regarding this matter.
Bassett inquired about the information contained in the April/May
1989 issue of the Metro Monitor regarding sludge and ash storage
at the Seneca Plant. Polta responded that the figures contained
in the article appear to be inaccurate.
VII/VIII. FUTURE MEETING/ADJOURNMENT
The next meeting of the committee will be at 5:00 p.m., Wednesday,
June 14, 1989, at Eagan City Hall.
This meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m.
(Ik
STATEMENT OF GOALS
SENECA ODOR CONTROL ADVISORY
To provide for information exchange and open discussion
To provide a forum for preview, review and updates of
construction progress and status
To review odor complaints
To resolve potential conflicts and difficulties by more
effective communication
Adopted May 10, 1989
11-2--
MEMO TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
JON HOHENSTEIN, ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR
KRIS RAGEMAN, RECYCLING SPECIALIST
FROM: JEFF WELDON, ADMINISTRATIVE INTERN
DATE: JUNE 9f 1989
SUBJECT: PUBLIC MEETING -DAKOTA COUNTY INCINERATOR
On Tuesday, June 6, I attended a public meeting at the Rosemount
High School sponsored by the Metropolitan Council regarding the
proposed incinerator. The intent of the meeting was to hear public
testimony regarding the scoping document which will be incorporated
in the EIS for the project. Approximately 200 people attended the
meeting. While some of those who testified were from Eagan, Apple
Valley and West St. Paul, most were from Rosemount, Hastings,
Farmington and the rural townships of Coates, Vermillien and
Empire.
Virtually all of those who testified cited health, safety and
environmental concerns. Several academicians provided testimony
about the economic implications of the project. Virtually all
individuals who testified criticized the County Board for what they
termed a lack of proper planning and failing to provide answers to
critical questions about health and safety, operations,
inspections, costs, etc. A major question was the Board's lack of
planning for the proper disposal of ash.
Dakota County Citizens Against Burning (DCCAB) displayed a petition
containing over 7,000 signatures of residents opposed to the
incinerator. The lack of positive public relations by Koch
Refinery has exacerbated acceptance problems for incinerator
proponents. Virtually every testifier cited the combination of an
incinerator and the refinery as posing unacceptable health risks.
I have a complete set of.notes and other information I picked up
if you are interested.
tive Intern
JW/vmd
l_�3
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1989
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH YEAR-TO-DATE
'Electrical
140 596
Plumbing
94 387
HVAC
124 422
Water Softener
5 25
Signs
17 57
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank
0 0
Sewer & Water
76 258
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
i-14
TYPE
NO.
VALUATION
PERMIT FEE
PLAN REV FEE
TOTAL FEES
7
FOUNDATION
1
$
$ 15.00
$
$ 15.00
222
SINGLE FAMILY
60
6,679,000
40,262.00
20,131.00
181,615.50
2
DUPLEX
2
174,000
1,164.00
582.00
5,761.00
21
TOWNHOUSE
13
2,212,000
11,298.00
5,649.00
112,323.50
0
CONDO
0
0
APT BLDGS
0
0
AGRICULTURAL
0
'
11
COMM/IND (NEW)
5
5,589,000
16,530.00
8,265.00
111,297.50
56
COMM/IND REMODEL
13
785,500
4,462.00
1,118.00
5 976.00
4
COMM/IND ADDITION
2
4,565,000
11,960.00
5,980.00
50,431.50
0
INSTITUTIONAL
0
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
0
9
RES. GARAGES
8
61,000
768.00
86.00
901.50
25
RES. ADD./PORCH
11
127,000
1,444.00
415.00
1,945.00
5
SWIM POOL
1
28,000
272.00
---
286.00
144
MISCELLANEOUS
55
114,100
2,036.00
215.00
2,339.50
0
DEMOLISH
0
0
HOUSE MOVES
0
MO. SUBTOTAL
171
20,334,600
90,211.00
42,441.00
472,892.00
ADJUSTMENTS
LOT CHANGE
PENALTY CO
LECTED ON B.P.
f16367
50.00
MO. TOTAL
20,334,600
90,211.00
42,441.00
472,942.00
508
51,526,115
254,155.50
120,590.00
1,354,421.60
YEAR-TO-DATE
i-14
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS — MONTHLY REPORT
DATE 14AY 1989
MULTI—FAMILY BREAKDOWN
1
MO. 11 '--m0.
#
1
MO. 11 11
YTD #
1
YTD U
1
OF a
OF
1
OF 11
OF
1
OF
TYPE
1
PERMITS 1
UNITS
a
BLDGS. 11
UNITS
1
BLDGS.
DUPLEX
1
2 1
2
1
1 11
2
1
1
1
1
1
11
1
3—PLEX
1
1
e
11
1
4—PLEX
1
8 1
8
1
2 11
12
1
3
1
1
1
11
1
1
/
1
11
e
5—PLEX
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
ee
1
1
1
1
11
1
6—P.LEX
7—PLEX
1
1
1
11
7
1
1
8—PLEX
1
5 e
40
1
5 11
64
1
8
1
1
1
11
1
10—PLEX
1
e
e
n
1
1
1
0
11
1
1
1
1
11
1
12—PLEX
1
1
1
11
1
16—PLEX
1
1
e
11
1
e
1
1
e1
e
APT. BLDG.
1
1
e
11
1
1
1
1
11
1
1
1
1
11
e
OTHER
1
1
1
el
1
e
1
e
e1
1
1
e
1
Ie
1
TOTAL
1
15 1
50
1
8 11
85
1
13
1
1
1
11
1
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL dr INSTITUTIONAL BREAKDOWNS
DATE MA'i 1989
BLDG.
1
I
I
I
PERMIT
8 e ADDRESS & LEGAL
1
OWNER
1
VALUATION
1
OCCUP.
16526
LONE OAK RD
;19
OPUS CORP
a $
2,974,000
a
COMM
NEW
PK 3990
F
14 M. AC ^TR IND
1
11875 PLAZA DRIVE
1
GALAXIE CLIFF
1
1,410,000
1
COMM
NEW
16399
ILI, B1 GALAXIE QUIFF PLAZAI
PLAZA PARTNER SHIPI
1
11270 YANKEE DOODLE RD
1
SIGNAL BANK
1
942,000
I
„
NEW
16428
ILI, B1, TOWN CENTRE 100 2ND1
1
I..OMM
16514
0 RAHNCLIFF CT
/I
RAHNCLIFF
249,000
1
^OMM
NEW
ILI, B3, RAHNCLIFF 2ND
1
,^.RDSSINrS_ lN.^.
1
e"
14260 LEXINGTON AVE
1
1
I
16433
IOUTLOT D, LEXINGTON PTE
e
TRI—LAND PARTNER.1
14,000
COMM
NEW
13773 HWY 149
I
WEST PUBL. CO
1
3,815,000
1
^OMM
ADD
16434
ILI B1 WEST PUBL. 2ND
1
I
1
16431
13340 PILOT KNOB RD
1
AMERICAN SOCIETY
1
750,000
1
COMM
ADD
IL6 B3 EFFRESS ADD
1
OF CEREAL CHEM.
1
1
16504
1905 YANKEE DOODLE RD
1
I
SNIDER DRUG STORE
406,000
I
IC
OMM
1MPR
ILI B1 EAG CTR IND PK #5
1
16541
11060 LONE OAK RD
I
OPUS CORP
I
1
170,000
1
1
COMM
1MPR
IL6-9,.B5, EAG CTR IND PK 3
1
16440
11030 LONE OAK RD
1
OPUS CORP
1
90,000
1,
COMM
1MPR
IL10-13. B5. EAC CTR IND PK
9
1
16418
12926 LONE OAK CIR
I
V1I:LAUME 1NDUSTRII
52,000
I
1
C OMM
1MPR
IL5, B0, EAG CTR 1ND PK 2
1
16507
13440 FEDERAL DR
1
1
NOONE'i MCMI.
1
1
18,000
1
1
COMM
1MPR
ILI B1 BICENTENNIAL 5TH
11969-1/2 SILVER BELL RD
1
1
1
16536
11.1, B1, SILVER BELL CTR
1
METRAM PROPERTIESI
13,000
a
COMM
1MPR
13440 FEDERAL DR., STE 140
1
1
1
16465
ILI B1 BICENTENNIAL 5TH
I
NOONEY MGMT
1
8,000
1
COMM
1MPR
11380 DUCKWOOD DR
1
1
1
16441
ILI, B1, EAGAN CONV. CTR.
1
K CHARLES DEVEL
a
7,000
(COMM
1MPR
12070 CLIFF RD
1
1
16463
ILI, B2 SECT 31
1
STATE OF MN
1
7,000
1
COMM
1MPR
11270 TOWN CENTRE DR
1
1
1
16480
11.3, B1, TOWN CTR 100 6TH
1
FEDERAL LAND CO
a
5,000
a COMM
1MPR
11960 CLIFF LAKE RD
16458
IL2, B1, CLIFF LAKE CTR
R H C ASSOC
a
4,000
a COMM
1MPR
11290 TOWN CENTRE DR
1
1
1
16396
I1.2 B1 TOWN CTR 70 2ND
1
SHARIN EFFR_ESS
_1
4,000 _
1
COMM
1MPR
11980 CLIFF LAKE RD
1
RHC JOINT
1
1
16483
IL2 B1 CLIFF LAKE CTR
1
VFNTIIRF 1
e
1,500
I
COMM
1MPR
a
1
1
I
I
1
1
e
a
1
1
1
1
I
I
a
1
1
1
a
1
1
J
a
1
1
a
1
e
e
l '—I (-4P
PROTECTIVE INSPECTIONS MONTHLY REPORT - MAY 1988
NUMBER OF PERMITS ISSUED THIS MONTH
Electrical 164
Plumbing 103
HVAC 119
Water Softener 12
Signs 7
Well, Cesspool, Septic Tank 2
YEAR-TO-DATE
NATURE OF BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
YTD MONTHLY
582
0 :APT BLDGS
0 (AGRICULTURAL
.
•ALUA'11V1Y
raxMli ren
1r LAN nr:v FEE
TOTAL FEES
5
FOUNDATION
3
!$
$ 97.00
$
$ 97.00
266
SINGLE FA14ILY
78
7,943,900
44,552.00
! 22,276.00
210,900.50
16
DUPLEX
4
I 236,000
1,640.00
820.00
9,762.00
31
TOWNHOUSE
18
1,060,000
7,372.00
3,686.00
43,916.00
4
CONDO
275.00
27
RES. ADDITIONS
9I 95,000
952.00
0 :APT BLDGS
0 (AGRICULTURAL
4 1 COK-LrRCIAL
31 (COMM/IND REMODEL 6 ! 140,000
I 450.00 77.00 597.00
1
COMI4/IND ADDITION
0
INDUSTRIAL
O
IINSTITUTIONAL
2
PUBLIC FACILITIES
2 I 637,995
I
...1,969.00
5
RES. GARAGES
3 23,000
262.00 +
275.00
27
RES. ADDITIONS
9I 95,000
952.00
233.00 1,237.00
10
SWIM POOL
6 I 53,000
580.00
57.00 664.50
150
MISCELLANEOUS
54 ,
87,300
1,678.00 I
1,728.00
1
DE14OLISH
1 I
NO
FEES
1
Hr,USE MOVES
1
30.00
30.00
554
MO. TOTALS
185
10,276,195
57,613.00
27,149.00 1 271,176.00
- 1
ADJUSTMENTS S -F.
- 1
- 166,000
- 788.00
+ 344.00
- 394.00 - 3,061.00
553
YEAR-TO-DATE
184
38,246,967
206,100.00
98,213.50 I 946,325.60
NOTE. $200 STATE SURCHARGE COLLECTED FOR & $144 T.P. FEE COLLECTED ON PREVIOUS PERMITS.