The URL can be used to link to this page

12/05/1989 - City Council RegularAGENDA IIAR MEETING ALAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING DECEMBER 5, 1989 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. I -NET Services to Fire Stations #4 and #5. B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P, 2 1. Review County's Proposed 5 Year Capital Improvement Program C. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Mission Statement IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) P P A. PERSONNEL ITEMS 1ZB. LICENSE, Amusement Devices for Pockets/Summit Amusement, 2020 Silver Bell Rd �,3C. RESOLUTIONS Requesting MnDOT Speed Limt Study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff to Diffley) �S D. AMENDMENT to Development Contract, Hills of Stonebridge II E. ACCEPT Donated Property from West Publishing F. APPLICATION for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis/Dennis Ellingson, Program Administrator .2( G. FINAL PLAT, Town Centre 100 Fifth Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) 23_H. FINAL PLAT, George W. Giles Addition ZqI. CONTRACT 88-10, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Eagandale / Center Industrial Park 9th and 10th Additions) y 7J. CONTRACT 88-30, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (South Oaks Streets and Utilities). (, �-�KCONTRACT 88 -KK, Acknowledgement of Completion (Community of Joy Church) ( �L.. CONTRACT 85-R, Acknowledgement of Completion (UPS - Utilities) ys M. CONTRACT 88-32, Acknowledgement of Completion/Final Payment (Well #12, Pumphouse & Facilities) ZS, N. VACATE Sewer Easement, Receive Request/Schedule Public Hearing (Thomas Lake and 1 Diffley Road) ,QQ V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) A. VACATE Portion of Westerly Right -of -Way (Lexington Way) J— B. VACATE Portion of T.H. 13 (Neil Heine) 3? -C. VACATE Portion of Cedarvale Boulevard (Cedarvale Shopping Center) 34 D. PROJECT 574, Eagandale Center Industrial (Streetlights) �E. PROJECT 583, Park Center (Streets and Utilities) q0F. PROJECT 578, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Storm Sewer) 8:00 - PUBLIC HEARING* 10\G P *The Public Hearing for Item G. will begin at 8:00 p.m. Any Public Hearings, Items A through F, that have not commenced prior to 8:00 p.m, will be held immediately following this public hearing. PROPOSED Property Tax Levy Certification for 1990 and 1990 General Fund Budget VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) p,(O A. REQUEST for Reimbursement, Kingswood Addition/Jim Horne, Park Dedication/Application (f Fees VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) 10-1A. CANCELLATION of 1989 and 1990 Installments of Special Assessments on HUD Purchased Property/Authorize Prepayment of all Outstanding Balances ((7-B. PROPOSED 1990 Fee Schedule ; C'j3,U AMENDMENTS, Solid Waste Ordinances P ,,K D. VARIANCE, Tim & Connie White, of 4 -Feet to Side Yard Setback to Accommodate Expansion of Existing Single Family Home, 4480 Oak Chase Way (Lot 5, Block 2, Oak Chase 3rd Addition) (qj E. EXTENSION, Preliminary Plat, Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church �7l F. LICENSE, Off -Sale Liquor, Cheers Wine & Spirits/Scott Liquor Company, 1995 Rahncliff Court/Rahncliff Crossings (S�G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Xavier's Restaurant, to Allow On -Sale Liquor in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) District Located on Lot 3, Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition, Town Centre Drive in NW 1/4 of Sec 15 IJH. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, A & R Pallet Crating, to Allow Outside Storage in a LI (Light Industrial) District Located on Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition, •East of Highway 3 in SE 1/4 of Sec 36 `� I. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Rahncliff Crossings, Inc., to Revise the Overall Pylon {1 Sign Exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development Located South of Cliff V Road and West of Highway 35E in NW 1/4 of Sec 32 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 1989 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR DECEMBER 5, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval is given to the December 5, 1989 City Council agenda and regular meeting minutes for the November 21 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Item 1. I -Net Services to Fire Stations #4 and S --At the November 9 City Council meeting, a request to make payment to Cable TV North Central for the installation of cable service, I -Net and Subscriber Network for Fire Stations 4 and 5 was continued to the December 5 City Council meeting, directing City staff to question the proposed installation charges. The proposed cost for the installation is $1,354.50 for Fire Station 4 and $4,709.16 for Fire Station 5. Cable TV North Central is requesting reimbursement for the installation cost due to language in the franchise agreement that states "Additional facilities would be added at no cost if they were within 200 feet of existing I -Net plant." The two Fire Stations are much further away than 200 feet. The original franchise agreement identified public buildings that were in existence at the time as receiving cable, installation of I -Net and Subscriber Network at no cost to the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission. The franchise agreement also states that the company will be responsible for the first 200 feet of extension costs as provided by the franchise agreement. There was no provision made for future public buildings, such as Fire Stations 4 and 5. Due to their locations in the community, both exceed the conditions of the franchise agreement and, therefore, require that this payment be made from retained franchise fees. The original estimate by Cable TV North Central is in the range of $12,000. The total cost for the Sub -Net and I -Net service to Fire Stations 4 and 5 will be approximately $6,000, a savings that Cable TV North Central has agreed to. Unfortunately, the City has no further claim to total payment due to the franchise agreement that was executed by both the City and the company. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize payment from retained franchise fees for the installation of both I -Net and Sub -Net to Fire Stations 4 and 5 at the reduced cost of $6,063.66. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Review County's Proposed 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program --The County has forwarded to the City's attention their proposed 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the years 1990-1994. In addition, the County has included anticipated "projects that may require reevaluation during this 5 -Year CIP for,further consideration. However, no specific date as been set or scheduled for those improvements. Enclosed on pages and 11L is an excerpt of the Coun's CIP showing those improvements within the City of Eagan. Also enclosed on page S is a map of the City showing the location of these various improvements along with their proposed year. As can be seen, it is estimated that approximately $5,900,000 will be the City's obligation during the next five years, with an ultimate estimated City cost of $8,126,000 for all future anticipated improvements (based on 1989 dollars). It is the staff's understanding that the Dakota County Board of Commissioners has approved the budget allocation as shown for 1990. The Public Works Director would like to review these proposed improvements with the City Council and discuss any proposed revisions or modifications. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify the Dakota County Highway 'S -Year, CIP. N DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP 1990-1994 NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PROJECT 4 -Lane Divided 4 -Lane Divided Temp. Signal EST. CITY COST $653,000 350,000 (1) 25,000 CITY STAFF COMMENTS Move to 1991? Traffic YEAR ROAD Move SEGMENT (FROM/TO) 1. 1990 CSAH 26 CR 43 - TH 55 2. 1990 CSAH 31 CSAH 33 - Rebecca Ln 3. 1990 CSAH 32 At Slaters Rd. 4. 1991 CR 28 un to 1991 At Coachman ,Road 5. 1991 CSAH 31 At Corporate Ctr. Dr �6. 450,000 13. 1994 CR 28 55 CSAH 63 43 - 1992- CSAH 26 TH - 7. 1992 CSAH 26 At Eagandale Blvd. 8. 1992 CR 43 At Wescott Road DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP 1990-1994 NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PROJECT 4 -Lane Divided 4 -Lane Divided Temp. Signal EST. CITY COST $653,000 350,000 (1) 25,000 CITY STAFF COMMENTS Move to 1991? Traffic Signal (1) 45,000 Move un to.1990 TH 55 (Inv.Gr.Hts.) Const. Traffic Signal (2) 45,000 Move down to 1992 0.5 Mi.E. 4 -Lane Divided 650,000 1,913,000 11. 1993 CSAH 32 Turnlane & Signal (2) 75,000 Move un to 1991 405,000 12. Traffic Signal (2) 45,000 Move un to 1991 9.' 1993 CR 28 TH 149 - TH 55 (Inv.Gr.Hts.) Const. 2 -Lane 100,000 10. 1993 CSAH 30 0.5 Mi.E. of CSAH-31 - TH 3 4 -Lane Divided 1,913,000 11. 1993 CSAH 32 TH 77 - I -35E 4 -Lane Divided 405,000 12. 1994 CSAH 26 TH 13 - CSAH 31 4 -Lane Undivided 450,000 13. 1994 CR 28 CR 43 - TH 149 4 -Lane Divided 1,150,000 SUBTOTAL $5,906,000 Possibly 6 lane? = Addt'l Cost Delay to future year? YEAR ROAD SEGMENT (FROM/TO) DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP 1990-1994 NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PROJECT EST. DESCRIPTION CITY COST CITY STAFF COMMENTS 14. No Date CSAH 32 ChesMar Dr. - TH 3 4 -Lane Divided $2,000,000 15. No Date CR 28 At Washington Dr. Traffic Signal (1) 40,000 1991 16. No Date CSAH 31 At Deerwood Dr. Traffic Signal (1) 45,000 1990? Relocate to High Site Dr. 17. 1990 CSAH 371 At Towerview Dr. Traffic Signal 90,000 (Funding by Unisys T.I.F.) *18. No Date CSAH 32 At Beacon Hill Rd./Thomas Traffic Signal (1) 45.000 1990? Lk. Center Dr. TOTAL *Staff Recommended Addition (1) Presently meets some of the warrants for signal installation. (2) Signal installation warrants yet to be met/measured. 26 Lone Oak Road 28 Yankee Doodle Road 32 Cliff Road 31 Pilot Knob Road 43 Lexington Avenue 30. Diffley Road $8,126,000 T Ac ( L '1" a E T J ,a rs L 1992 1.7 FI7 1993 � -w- AA -s- 1994 X ot, jZ 3 so li i A- .4- ��Jl L w m6r 'T'.' p ILI . js @ D - (iI R IN w 37 M!4. Z -L AF` 12 dp)- 4; ROSE NT F G Al M 1990 ims mim im im m 1992 1993 1994 mv,wvAr2wJ NO SCHEDULE 0 SIGNAL ( 1990 — 1994 ) A SIGNAL (NO SCHEDULE) Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting C. POLICE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Mission Statement --Early in 1989, the Chief of Police, City Administrator and Police personnel, including representatives from sworn officers, dispatchers and clerical held an all -day strategic planning session and as a result, various goals, objectives and eventually a Mission Statement was developed. While developing the Mission Statement, each employee within the department was asked for their opinion, and many of those ideas were incorporated into the Mission Statement. Chief of Police Geagan is giving each employee a copy of the Mission Statement. For a copy of a memo from Chief Geagan and the Mission Statement, refer to pages - through K Since the Mission Statement reflects public policy, it seemed appropriate for the City,Council to review and give its endorsement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Mission Statement as developed by the Eagan Police Department. G police department ®r 3830 Not Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612):454-3900 November 14, 1989 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: PAT GEAGAN, POLICE CHIE1 4� SUBJECT: EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT PATRICK J. GEAGAN ahlol of rows KENNETH D. AOMNN Operallpru Capspin VIC ELLISON Moyer THOMAS EGAN DAVID K GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council MemCers THOMAS HEDGES Cdy Adm n6*Wv EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE COY Cleh As a result of our Strategic Planning Session early this year, the Police Department has developed a Mission Statement which the Eagan. City Council may want to review. This Mission Statement was developed by Eagan Police Department Staff. Each employee within the department was asked for their opinion and many of those ideas were incorporated into the Mission Statement. The Mission Statement, as well as the overall Strategic Plan, would not have been accomplished without the enthusiastic effort and support by Police Department Staff. The Eagan Police Department Mission Statement will be given to each employee and reviewed with each new employee. This Mission Statement will give Police Department Staff the basic foundation needed to make the Eagan Police Department one of the finest Law Enforcement Agencies in Minnesota. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police PJG:lb Attachment THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE'SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer MISSION THE MISSION OF THE EAGAN POLZCE DEPARTMENT IS TO SAFEGUARD FREEDOM, TO PRESERVE LIFE AND PROPERTY, TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS AND MAINTAIN RESPECT FOR'THE RULE OF THE LAW BY PROPER ENFORCEMENT. THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS AN OPPORTUNITY GREATER THAN ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY TO PROVIDE A BROAD RANGE OF QUALITY PUBLIC'SAFETY AND HUMAN SERVICES TO OUR COMMUNITY. IN FULFILLMENT OF THIS MISSION, WE AFFIRM THAT THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT: * SHALL REGARD ALL PEOPLE WE SERVE AS PERSONS OF DIGNITY AND WORTH, AND ADJUST OUR BEHAVIOR TO MEET'THE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE WITH WHOM WE WORK OR FOR WHOM WE PROVIDE SERVICE. * SHALL MAKE PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE PARAMOUNT BY MEETING OR SURPASSING ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY STANDARDS OF QUALITY SERVICE. * SHALL NURTURE HIGH ETHICAL AND MORAL STANDARDS, AND RECOGNIZE THE VALUE OF EACH EMPLOYEE IN FULFILLING THE MISSION OF THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT. * SHALL MAINTAIN OPEN COMMUNICATION AND RELATIONSHIPS OF TRUST, RESPECT AND CONCERN AMONG EMPLOYEES, ADMINISTRATION, AND VOLUNTEERS TO PROVIDE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR PERSONAL SATISFACTION, GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS. * SHALL FOSTER PERSONAL INNOVATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY. - * SHALL PARTICIPATE IN AND CARRY ON TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES SUPPORTIVE TO ITS MISSION. ITIS CRITICAL THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT UNDERSTAND AND SUPPORT THE ORGANIZATION'S MISSION. OUR MISSION IS OUR LEGITIMATE BASIS FOR EXISTENCE AND THE BASIS OF OUR PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, GOALS, OBJECTIVES,, RULES, REGULATIONS, OPERATING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND PRACTICES. 06 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting �NSENT AiGElYDA;; There are fourteen (14) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Resignation/Police Officer -- On November 24, 1989, the City received a letter of resignation from Patrol Officer Tomma A. Freundschuh, effective December 17, 1989. Officer Freundschuh has accepted a position with the Minneapolis Police Department. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept, the resignation of Patrol Officer Tomma. A. Freundschuh, effective December 17, 1989. Item 2. Investigative Sergeant Position -- As a part of organizational development for the Eagan Police Department, Police Chief Geagan had proposed the establishment of the position of Investigative Sergeant for both 1989 and 1990. After discussions with the City Administrator, it was determined that the position would definitely be proposed to the City Council to begin in calendar year 1991. However, recent events have caused the consideration of this position to be updated. One of the present sergeants, Sergeant Ken Conyers, was recently injured on duty (injury to right hand) to such an extent that his doctor has determined that Sergeant Conyers would not be able to safely perform the duties which could be required of a Patrol Sergeant and would run a significant risk of continuing re-injury. Under the Human. Rights Act, an employer is under an obligation to provide reasonable accommodation for the handicapped. Creating a totally new position would probably not be regarded as reasonable accommodation. However, if a position already exists, the establishment of which is planned for the near future, it would be appropriate to move the establishment of that position to the present time: The doctor and the City's workers' compensation representatives both support the assignment of Sergeant Conyers to the position of Investigative Sergeant as being more beneficial for both the City and Sergeant Conyers than retraining Conyers for another line of work. The sergeant is an experienced police professional who first began employment with the City of Eagan in 1975. He is also experienced and has performed well in investigation. The move from Patrol Sergeant to Investigative Sergeant would be a lateral move. City Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting Administrator Hedges and Chief of Police Geagan both support and recommend to the Council that the position of Investigative Sergeant be moved up from January 1, 1991 to the present and that Sergeant Ken Conyers be appointed to the new position. This move would not entail the hiring of a completely new employee and there is money in the Police Department's 1989 budget to cover this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the creation of the position of Investigative Sergeant, effective in December, 1989, and to approve the appointment of Sergeant Ken Conyers to this position. Item 3. Patrol Sergeant Position -- If the above action concerning the Investigative Sergeant position is approved, the City will be short one Patrol Sergeant. For the Council's information, the department is currently operating with only two sergeants instead of four, as the result of injuries to two of the sergeants. Therefore, it would be advisable to appoint a Patrol Sergeant for the vacancy left by Sergeant Conyers as soon as possible. The City held oral boards and examinations for the position of sergeant earlier this year. Because less than a year has passed since these promotion examinations, it is the recommendation of Chief of Police Geagan that the next officer on the eligibility list for sergeant be appointed Patrol Sergeant at this time. That person is Officer Steven Grimm. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Officer Steven Grimm to the position of Patrol Sergeant, effective in December, 1989. Item 4. Compensation/Winter Recreation Leaders -- The City of Eagan has experienced difficulty in recruiting a sufficient number of applicants for Winter Recreation Leaders this year. In addition, the City would be placed in a very awkward position if any number of the leaders were to resign before the season's end. These positions basically are the warming house and sliding hill attendants who monitor activities at the City's winter facilities, are present to respond to emergency situations, and act as the City's representative. The leaders are in direct contact with Eagan residents of all ages. The City's current starting wage for these positions is $4.50 per hour. This wage rate has not been adjusted during the last two years. The City has surveyed other cities to ascertain their wage rates for this position and also other employers in the Eagan area who offer pan time jobs. In order to be competitive with these markets and to attract and retain applicants who can successfully and reliably perform tasks as winter recreation leaders, it is the recommendation of the Director of Parks and Recreation that the City maintain the current base wage rates for winter recreation leaders but also add a $ .50 per hour incentive for all leaders who complete the season's work. This system is used in other cities and has been successful. pj- Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a $ .50 per hour incentive for all Winter Recreation Leaders who complete the season. Item 5. Winter Recreation Leaders -- The following persons are recommended for hire as Winter Recreation Leaders by Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi. Additional recommendations will be presented to the Council with the Administrative Agenda Packet, on Monday or at future Council meetings. Returning Staff: New Staff: Brad Czubernat Sara Berkebile Kevin Duffy Barry Billmeyer Mike Geere Pat Boquist Tim Gill Troy Christopherson Andy Halvorsen Jami Lee Cullen Cory Lynch Rob De Rosier Tim McElligott Chris Fitch Tom McNurlin Tyrone Johnson Jeff Olson Shane Johnson Brent Tait Shannon Kerry John Tracy Roger Ketterline Tom Wise Kent Knutson Brandon Kusnier Steven Lakler Catherine Liberty Daniel McNamara Ray Sperl Pete Walters David Wang ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the persons listed above as Winter Recreation Leaders for the 1989-90 winter season. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting AMUSEMENT DEVICE/POCKETS B. License, Amusement Devices for Pockets/Summit Amusement --A request by Summit Amusement Company for appro)dmately 37 amusement devices is in order for consideration. Included as amusement devices are 11 Valley pool tables, four pinball machines and the remainder are game machines such as Superstars, Black Night, Police Force, etc. The Police Department has reviewed this application and given its approval for consideration by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amusement device license for Summit Amusement for 37 amusement machines at Pockets located at 2020 Silver Bell Road. l� Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting RESOLUTION/MNDOT SPEED LIMIT STUDY/JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD C. Approve Resolution Requesting MnDOT Speed Limit Study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff Road To Diffley Road) --With the recent completion of Johnny Cake Ridge Road from the Mallard Park Addition to Diffley Road, it would be appropriate to have a formal speed study performed on the entire segment of Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Cliff to Dtlf�ey to ensure that the proper enforceable speed limit is established. Enclosed on page is a resolution necessary to request MnDOT to prepare the appropriate speed limit study to establish an enforceable speed limit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a Resolution requesting MnDOT speed limit study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff Road to Diffley Road). RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATION MnDOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has recently constructed Johnny Cake Ridge Road as a public street within the community; and, WHEREAS, the City would like to establish enforceable speed limits along this local street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, hereby request the MnDOT Metro - District to perform all required speed studies necessary to designate the proper speed limit for the street described as follows: Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Cliff Road (County Road 32) to Diffley Road (County Road 30) located in the W ; of Section 28, Township 27, Range 23 in Dakota County. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest• Its Clerk CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1989. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting AMENDMENT/HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 11 D. Amendment to Development Contract, Hills of Stonebridge II --The final plat for Hills of Stonebridge II was approved by the City Council at the October 17, 1989 meeting. Inadvertently, the exhibit B attached to the development agreement was included in error. Therefore, approval of the application should be amended to delete the original exhibit B in the development contract and replace it with the corrected version: Because this issue has yet to be resolved, the Community Development Department is requesting that this item be continued indefinitely. For additional"informaton on this item, refer to a � memo from Community Development enclosed on page (P . Once a corrected development agreement is in place, it will be scheduled for formal Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue indefinitely the amendment to the development contract for the Hills of Stonebridge II. l� MEMO TO: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER FROM: MARLENE 2ALE2NICRj PLANNER I vkz- DATE: DECEMBER 1t 1989 SUBJECT: STATUS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE PLAT II The final plat for the above -referenced subdivision was approved by the City Council on October 17, 1989. Exhibit B of the Development Contract approved with this final plat is incorrect. To correct Exhibit B, an amendment document was drafted and scheduled for City Council approval on November 9, 1989. The developer, however, did not sign the amendment because he was unsure of his ability to comply with Item 6 of the revised Exhibit B. Item 6 requires the developer to increase the wet pond volume of Pond JP -22 by 1.8 acre feet for a total wet pond volume of 3.0 acre feet. Three acre feet of wet pond volume was the amount determined by Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation as necessary to reduce phosphorous loading of this development to pre -development levels. It should be noted that this requirement was a condition of preliminary plat approval granted on June 6, 1989. The developer's engineer, City Engineering and Planning staff, and a representative from Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation met on November 30, 1989, to discuss this issue. At this meeting, the developer's representative indicated that providing the required wet pond volume in Pond JP -22 would be expensive and may impact a stand of mature oak trees. It was determined by staff that a 'lesser wet pond volume increase in Pond JP -22 may be acceptable, provided the wet pond volume of Pond JP -53 is also increased. The combined wet pond volume of Ponds JP -22 and JP -53, however, must reduce phospherous loading to pre -development levels. The developer's engineer is currently performing calculations to ensure this standard will be met. The development contract amendment was originally scheduled for City Council on November 9 and twice deferred to the November 21 and December 5 meetings. Staff recommends indefinite deferral to assure that Item 6 of Exhibit B can be adequately resolved. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting 01 PROPERTY DONATION/WEST PUBLISHING E. Accept Donated Property from West Publishing --Recently West Publishing donated a barn to the City of Eagan to be used for Fire Department training. Since West will be claiming this donation as a charitable contribution, it is necessary for the City to formally acknowledge the receipt of the property and to execute the required IRS forms. The value of the barn is listed at $63,683. The Fire Department has completed its training and the barn was burned. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve acceptance of the barn by West Publishing Company as a donation and authorize the City Clerk to execute the IRS forms on behalf of the City of Eagan. LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSEPI'RANSPORTATION CLUB OF ST PAUL F. Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis/Dennis Ellingson, Program Administrator --Mr. Dennis Ellingson representing the Transportation Club of St. Paul/Minneapolis has made application for an exemption from a lawful gambling license. The Transportation Club is selling calendars as a fund raiser and attached to each calendar is a raffle ticket and the winning ticket received $20. Mr. and Mrs. Ellingson are Eagan residents and they plan to make the drawings from their home. The drawings for daily winners will continue until December 20 with all proceeds from calendar sales going to the University of Minnesota Variety Club, Children's Hospital and other charitable organizations. The Ellingsons qualify for an exemption from the lawful gambling license due to the nature of the raffle and the low winning amount of $20. For additional information and a copy of their application, refer to pages t 8 through cD The Police Department is reviewing the application and their findings will be presented with the Administrative Agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the application for an exemption from lawful gambling license for the Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis. lI MEMO TO: POLICE CHIEF GEAGAN FROM: LIEUTENANT STEVENSON DATE: NOVEMBER 300 1989 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAVFUL GAMBLING LICENSE TRANSPORTATION CLUB OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS The Transportation Club is a social/educational organization made up from eight separate clubs (Delta Nu Alpha fraternity, Twin City Traffic Club, etc.). It is a professional organization for people in the transportation field. They have printed up 5,000 calendars and are selling them to their own members and friends, not door to door, for $5.00. $1,700 goes to printing costs, $8,300 goes to pay out on the raffle ($20.00 daily and two $500 prizes) and the rest (anything over $10,000) goes to the University Children's Hospital. This organization is 19 years old. The routine checks on the program administrators all came back fine. Their intention is to hold the drawings at their home on December 20th. I find no reason to ask the Council to pass a resolution prohibiting this raffle. to CG220 Minnesota Lawful Gambling few. fees, Application for Exemption from For Office Use Only Lawful Gambling License Fill in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and send it in at least 45 days before your gambling activity for processing. Name and Address of Oraanization =i HC 7 2A,'SPORTA7)0AI 041 OZ 6ra.(xi2�s _ A)r„-4-r- ) - .9 -7,5? 57 -7 71F/ Seem - -- -- Clry - S!ete Zip code County, 81,20 P -,.✓al 4-1 Yt'W -S /a/ h/ca ✓c Chiel executive officer Phone Alanager // Phone _1Xo. qS D. F,scJ.54�/j (b,2) yS7-973s W.C. Cle. rlc A (612) et8'-3F7y' Type of Non-profit Organization Years in existence = Attach proof of three -years or more of existence. Number of active members EI Fraternal O Religious ❑ Veterans ❑ Other non-proth N you checked box for other nonprofit, Cheek one of the following and attach proof of nonprofit status [I IRS designation incorporated with Secretary of State ❑ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (charter, .y M GaV_rtkLiMcljS_ite Name of site where activity will take place / �^ _�.)F_NNIS C S<-.✓�.. E.i1r�j o -w ` �61�J/1M 1..� /��Q.«,.rrST2 `I,� _. Street U City Slate�— Zip code County 4'7Uy.. evdr 4 Ccm,27 �gsL 611) SSraa b�akv;.s- t Dates) of activity cams Bingo Yes No _0_ —_1 Rattles __pl_ Paddlewheels l -I Tipboard5-. ------ f7 Pull -tabs How will profit be used- may„_„{rp Jc, iA e h.1 %/{itic} C(u.6 //,, I OYkmc CGai2f i4/�/t lllr.,IAnj.yS �/d5 ,-�AL m!)5ar,7Ff+�. I dedare all information submitted to the Department of Gaming is true, accurate, and complete Local Government Acknowledgement I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the 1.;eparunent of Gaming and will become effoctivo 30 days from the date of receipt by the city or county, unless the localgovernment parses o resolutmn to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Department of Gaming within 30 days of the dare filled in below- Cities of the firs) class have 60 days in which to gcallow the activity. or City or county name Signature of person receiving application I iee/ .J'. Date received m.mn Signatuie of person receiving application Title Date rewivud rm._oaa n,.-a2.nwm Mall this application and fee of $25 (check made out to Commissioner of Revenue) to: ,Ma/ aarO �VmrbPyr.YVMb Department of Gaming -Gambling Control Division Mail Stadion 3315 St. Paul, M14 551463315 `-I S To All To Whom These rresents 9hnIk I;oeie, Greeting: Wherena, an Agreement and Artirloe of Consolidation be— tMeen The Tranaporation Club of Saint Vaal, Inc. and The Traffic Club of Mizinespolis, both Minnesota nonprofit corpora— times, dilly signed, certified and e.cknced.e•dgpd under oath, has hewn filed for record in this office on thn .17th dny of June, 1974, nt 9100 o'clock A.M., for the connolidntion of the above nn"d corporations into and under the nave of The Transportation Glob of Minnespolia and St, Paul, Inc., Kith registered office In St-, rntA. Minne!wta, parnunnt to the pToVisions of the ittanenoty Nonprofit Corporation Act, Chspter 317, ltinneacta 4tntnE•n. Now, tf+erefore, I, Arlen I, Frdshl, Secretary of State of thm 9tnte of Hien-snotn, by virtne of the pavers and duties vented is we by lav, do hereby certify that sold above named eorrarntione nra legally conaolidnt.ed into and evade an ezLoting eorpornt.ion ander the nnrn of Tho T'rwi,,portation Club of Hisneapolis end St. caul, Inc., wf.t.h the Ivwers, rights and pvivilages, and subject to the linitntinns, duties and re— ntTietiv.,r,w which by leu nrpvrtnf.n t.hcrnto. *,, ttH1h:!;9 my ifficial signature hereiatto nubneribed and the Great. "^;+I of thn State of r:I+•n.: :;..+: a I rre,ultn nli'ircd thla sevc.ni ecnUi ,I;+y of .1me, A. V., t• _ t. ;C_ .:, 1. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting FINAL PLATITOWN CENTRE 100 5TH ADDITION G. Final Plat, Town Centre 100 Sth Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) --Because the letter of intent for this project is not yet in place and signed copies of the development agreement still have not been received by the City, the developer is requesting that the plat be continued to the December 19, 1989, City Council meeting. Due to the fact that the final plat was placed on the City Council agenda of October 17, continued to November 9, continued to December 5 and is being requested for continuance again, it is strongly recommended that this item be continued indefinitely and not placed on a future Council agenda until all documentation is in place. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the final plat for Town Centre 100 5th Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) indefinitely until such time as all documentation is in order. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/GEORGE W. GILES ADDITION H. Final Plat, George W. Giles Addition --All documents relative to the final plat for George W. Giles Addition including the development agreement have been processed by both the applicant and the Department of Community Development. If .there are any reason that the final plat, should be removed from the agenda, a recommendation will be made at the time the agenda is adopted for the meeting. Enclosed on page 0.3 is a copy of the final plat as it appears for signature and recording at Dakota County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for George W. Giles Addition. 9 EXHIBIT "A" GEORGE W o„ tlo* r------� GILES ADDITION -gE 6, rn R8 Agenda Information Memo December 5; 1989, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETION/FINAL PYMT/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PK 9TH & 10TH I. Contract 88-10, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th & 10th Additions - Streets & Utilities) --We have received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a statement from our consulting engineer that all improvements have been completed in accordance with the City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by Public Works personnel and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 88-10 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th & 10th Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the 7th and final payment to Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of $50,590.56. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETIONIFINAL PYMT/SOUTH OAKS ADDN J. Contract 88.30, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (South Oaks Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a statement from the consulting engineer that the improvements have been completed in accordance with the City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 88-30 (South Oaks Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the 8th and final payment to Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc., in the amount of $9,225.14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETION/FINAL PYMT/COMMUNITY OF JOY CHURCH K. Contract 88 -KK, Acknowledgement of Completion (Community of Joy Church - Utilities) --The installation of utilities under the above -referenced private contract have been completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. Final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledgement completion of Contract 88 -KK (Community of Joy Church - Utilities). 0 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETION/UPS L. Contract 85-R, Acknowledgement of Completion (UPS - Utilities) -The installation of utilities performed privately by the developer have been completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the completion of Contract 85-R (UPS - Utilities). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETIONIFINAL PYMT (WELL #12 - PUMPHOUSE & FACILITIES) M. Contract 88-32, Acknowledgement of Completion/Final Payment (Well #12 - Pumphouse & Facilities) --The City has received a certification from our consulting engineering firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., indicating that the above - referenced contract has been completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action authorizing final payment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Acknowledge the completion of Contract 88-32 (Well #12 - Pumphouse & Facilities) and authorize the fifth and final payment of $12,337.71 to Shingobee Builders, Inc. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting VACATION/THOMAS LAKE & DIFFLEY ROAD N. Vacate Utility Easement/Schedule Public Hearing (Thomas Lake/Diffley Road - Sanitary Sewer) --During the construction and upgrading of Diffley Road, a sanitary sewer was installed with a future stub to the north for later extension. Due to the conflict with the existing Williams Brothers Pipeline pressure station located at this intersection, the sanitary sewer stub had to be relocated to avoid construction conflicts. This results in the necessity to acquire an additional easement and vacate the previously dedicated easement as shown by the sketch enclosed on page. Therefore, it would be appropriate to proceed with the formal public hearing to vacate the old easement dedication. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the request to vacate a sanitary sewer and utility easement (Thomas Lake and Diffley Road) and schedule a public hearing to be held on 'January 2, 1990. ®iffley MH -5 - --- --17 -- P -- 0 0 R v v � 2�4i r P.I.D. 02100-011-51 a v � n ca 4 Q� EASEMENT TO B$ VACATED _ �30' fb Road , ADDITIONALLY ACQUIRED DRAINAGE '& UTILITY EASEMENT I ulm I O O ' I a E � 4. LL- I J N SEE SHEET 50 0 50 100 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting yPIFBIICC ;HEARINGS;; VACATE PORTION OF WESTERLY R -O -W (LE)UNGTON WAY) A. Vacate Portion of Westerly Right -of -Way (Lexington Way) --On November 9th, the City Council considered a request by staff to vacate the excess portion of the westerly right-of-way resulting from the previous realignment of County Road 43 and the recent upgrading of the Lexington Way cul-de-sac as shown by the sketch and legal description enclosed on page 21__. A public hearing was scheduled for December 5th and all notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies and property owners informing them of this public hearing. There are existing telephone and electric facilities located in this proposed vacated public right-of-way. Therefore, the vacation should be subject to the retention of an underlying utility easement necessary to accommodate the existing facilities. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of the westerly right-of-way of Lexington Way as described subject to the retention of underlying utility easements for existing facilities. M s ...:J'. .... _AST _:eE J' •EST www ICET C' "E 50'12'92"E _sow I r M z M b • 1179.58 90'12'92"E U .._ _,.: e°- NAY - - — — - LEX�N0T0n —__—---_—,x•-s _ _ ---- .:woo• i T_ 0'b 0. i•fOw � � s - - - -' y9N�-j.� •i� ZJO' V z z M W "9~0e -E 0 M N M n U 0 847-K1 z - 0 N m - n N � W Proposed description. to vacate that part of Lexington Avenue and Lexington Way contained within the following described tracts of land: That part of the NW k of the SW k of Section 23, Township 27, Range 23, lying southwesterly of a line 60.00' southwest and parallel to the following described line: e Commencing at the NW corner of the NW k of the SW k of said Section 23, thence South 0012'520 East on an assumed bearing along the west line of said Section 23 a distance of 847.66 feet to the point of beginning, thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1125.65 feet and a central angle of 47°54'02', a distance of 941.07 feet and there terminating. Also, that part of the E k of the SE k of Section 22, Township 27, Range 23, lying northerly of Line 'A" and southwesterly of Line "B" as described below: Line "A": Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 1 a distance of 178.44 feet to the point of beginning, thence southwesterly along a non-tangential curve. Concave to the southeast having a radius of 60.00 feet, central angle 60°00'00" and a cord bearing of South 29647108" West, a distance of 62.83 feet, thence South 0012'52" East on an assumed bearing along the East line of said Section 22 a distance of 847.66 feet to the point of beginning, thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1125.65 feet and a central angle of 47054.020, a distance of 941.07 feet and there terminating. Agenda Information, Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting VACATIONIPORTION OF T.H. 13 B. Vacate Portion of T.H. 13 (Neil Heine) --With the new construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway (T.H.77), T.H.,13cwas realigned from its previous location. Subsequently,. MnDOT turned back to the City of'Eagan the right-of=way for the Old T.H. 13 alignment. On November 9, the City Council received a petition from the property owner, Mr. Neil Heine, at 4141 E. T.H. 13, requesting the City to vacate the excess right-of-way of this MnDOT turnback as shown by the. sketch and legal description enclosed on page. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the City has not received any objections to this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of excess public right-of-way for that portion of T.H. 13 as described and authorize the Mayor and, City Clerk to execute all related documents necessary for recording. "JK Q a [z R Cd 0 U d m ft 4 4 N w y t ,f0 �— C/l: OLD T.11. 17 SKETCH i OF NEAL HEINE PROPERTY I Area to be Vacated PIIOMSED R/m LIK That ,part of the NortMast Quarter of the -Southwest quarter. Section 19. Tardh p 27 North. Range 23 Veit, described o follmst Coeeaeiag at the north9est corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwa t Quarter{ theme on an saauaed bearing of South 00 degree 02 minutes 26 saeoods'Nesr 1291.00 feet along the vast line of maid Northwest quarter of the Southwest Quarter; theses North 62 degrees 09 RimteD 56 seconds Rest 673.11 feet to the Borth eaterly right of way line of old Trunk Nighwq No. 13, the point of hegi®ing of the tract to be described; theme South 50 degrees 04 minutes 3g seconds Seat, radially to daid.h1gh9q. 112.56 fest to the center line of said highways thence southwesterly 49/.18 feet along said center line. being • curve, concays to the southeest"awving a radius of 5723.29 fed and a central angle of 4 degrees 53 minutes 14 seconds. to the south lice of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes l8 seconds Nest 136.22 feat along: the mouth line of. said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to said northwesterly right of way line; thence northeasterly 575.74 fest along said right of way line, parallel with maid center line, being a curve having a radius of 5873.79 feet and a central angle of 5 degrees 38 minutes 55 seconds, to the point of beginning) except the S.E. 401 thereof.. CO. RD. 30 I S.N. Cor Section 19 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting VACATE PORTION OF CEDARVALE BLVD C. Vacate Portion of Cedarvale .Boulevard (Cedarvale Shopping Center) --There have been several public hearings regarding this vacation previously. Major concerns have, related to the continuance of the existing MTC Park and Ride facility and the requirement of the property owner to upgrade its parking lot expansion into this vacated .public right- of-way to current City standards. These issues and concerns have been finally resolved and included in an agreement which requires them toretain and maintain the existing. Park and Ride facility until such time that the City of Eagan provides formal notice of its abandonment or discontinuance. This agreement has been fully executed by all appropriate parties and is ready for formal Council action. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this proposed vacation. The City has received a response from NSP requesting that an underlying utility easement be retained to protect their existing facilities located within the area to be vacated. In addition, there are existing City facilities within this vacated right-of-way that should be protected by an underlying utility easement also. Enclosed on page is a legal description and map showing the location of the excess right-of-way requested to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Cedarvale Boulevard as described subject to the retention of an underlying utility easement for all existing facilities. 3-:2— - T-21' R -Z3 i%—') oLL P -3W1 ; OLD STATC TF:'JNK :11'GH'JYAY Nu_13 ) CE:DARVALE BOULEVARD x? i O r -SYB 3loT'W 1218.81 -- OE i / e K W 4-M7 Taz .+a 0 F ONTAGEOA I50 '' -- M 48'3l'oT^E 12.18.81 I ` Cedorvoio S"OPPig9 STREET VACATION DESCRIPTION (part of Cedarvale Boulevard and Old Frontage Road to State Trunk Hwy. 13) Center ` That part of Cedarvale Boulevard (old State Trunk Highway No. 13) and the adjoining Frontage Road lying southeasterly thereof described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section, 19, Township 27, Range 23,, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence S 6024'35"E on an assumed bearing along the west line thereof, a distance of 2018.74 feet to the tangent intersection with the centerline of Old State Trunk Highway No. 13 right-of-way; thence N 48°37'07" E along said centerline , a distance of 564.97 feet; thence S 41022'53" E, a distance of 73.50 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described,; thence S 41°22'53" E, a distance of 79.00 feet; thence N 48°37'07" E along the southeasterly line of said Frontage Road, a distance of 1218.81 feet; thence N 41°22'53" W, a distance of 79.00 feet; thence 5'480-37'O7" W along a line parallel with and 40'feet southeasterly of the inplace Cedarvale Boulevard centerline, a distance of 1218.81 feet to the point of beginning. z r r O � O. o r c °s z _ Mob, c or OaIn o m _ 3 � o x w 1 r C) 1 0 z M x x ED 1 I Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL. PKISTREETLIGHTS) D. Project 574, Eagandale Center Industrial Park (Streetlights) -In response to a petition submitted by one of the major property owners in this Industrial Park (Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility .report for the 'installation 'of streetlights in this area. On November 9; the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing to be held orl December 5 t formally discuss the proposed improvements. Enclosed on pages 3S through is a copy of that feasibility report for the Council's information and>review during the public hearing presentation to be provided by the Director of Public Works. A meeting has beenscheduled with representatives of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance and Opus Corporation to discuss the proposed project. Any additional comments or concerns raised during this meeting will be addressed at the public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, staff has not received any objections to the proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 574 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Streetlights) and, if approved, authorize their installation by NSP. 3 `� CITY OF RAGAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTKENT FEASIBILITY REPORT' FOR STREETLIGHTING' PROJECT #574 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK A11 of Section 3 West of 35 E except Country Home Heights Addition November 6, 1989 3S iWoFeagan 3830, PILOT MOB ROAD MC ELL SON EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122.1897 M°' PHONE:,(61214548100 THOMAS EGAN FAX (612145478363 DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA, November 34, 1989 THEODORE WACHTER cw'c M m THOMAS HEDGES Cay Ad�OWV EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL °Cry k CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT 'KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MN- 55122-1897 RE,:, City Project No. 574 Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Streetlights Dear Mayor and City Council: Enclosed is the feasibility report for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Streetlights. Included is a preliminary cost estimate and preliminary assessment roll for the project. Staff will be available to discuss and present the details of the project to the Council and other interested public at a time convenient to the Council. e pectfully su itted, M chael P. Foertsch, (4PE. Assistant City Engineer Enclosures MPF/7'f I hereby certify that the attached plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi- L� Date: /1 -/y -k Reg. No- / Zd`/f THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF 'STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 2`(— co e: This project covers the installation of streetlights serving all of Section 3, West of 35E except the Country Home Heights Addition. Feasibility 4 Recommendations: This project is feasible and is in accordance with the City's policy on the installation of street lights in this commercial/ industrial district. It can best be accomplished as outlined herein and not as a part of any other project. Discussion: The Opus Corporation in joint venture with Northwestern Mutual Life have petitioned for the installation of streetlights within the Eagandale Center Industrial ,Par k, North of Co. Rd. 26 (Lone Oak Rd.) and West of I -35E. The area consists of 116 commercial and industrial lots, parcels, and/or outlots which would benefit from streetlighting. Under the City's Streetlighting Policy, the proposed cost of streetlight installation is to assess the benefitted property on an area basis. The energy costs will be calculated on an area basis and will be billed quarterly to the existing developed properties along with the utility billing and the undeveloped properties are to be billed through a 5 year special assessment plan. The energy needs of Section 3 West of 35E, except Country Home Heights, are serviced by.Northern States, Power Company, and they offer the type of streetlighting poles, lighting fixtures, and the necessary maintenance service required by the City's Streetl•ighting policy. The project is proposed to have 21 streetlights installed, of which 4 will be private. The four private lights will be assessed against Lots 1-3, Block 3 Eagandale Office Park 3rd and Lots 1-2, Block 3, Eagandale Center Industrial Park as per the owners request. Overhead Streetlights: These 21 streetlights would be the standard overhead design with 38' fiberglass poles., a 6' mast arm, and a 'Shoe Box type fixture. (See Exhibit "A") These lights, underground wires, and transformers are proposed to be installed and maintained by Northern States Power Company,. Installation cost Estimates: The following cost estimate includes the cost of materials, labor., administration, legal and other related project costs. Public Lights 17 ea. -250 watt overhead streetlights @$3,031.95 $51,543.17 S% Contingency Factor 2,577.16 15$ Administration Cost 7.731.80 $61,851.80 Private Liahts 4 ea. -250 watt overhead 5$ Contingency Factor 15% Administration Cost TOTAL Energy cost Estimates: streetlights @$3,031.95 $7.65/light/month 21 Ea. @ $7.65 x'12 months 15% Overhead Cost $12,127.80 606.39 1.81'9.17 $14,553.37 $76,405.17 1,,,927.80/year-. 289.17 $2,216.97 Revenue Sources: Adequate revenue to cover the installation cost of this project will come from special assessments against the benefitted properties. Revenue for the energy and maintenance will come from the monthly utility billing for each developed parcel along with,a special assessment for the first five years of energy cost for the proportionate share of each undeveloped parcel. Assessments: Assessments are proposed to be levied in accordance with current City policy. All costs of the project, including installation and energy will be assessed and spread over 5 years at a rate of interest, determined by the bond sale used to finance this project. Installation• Construction cost with overhead less (4) private lights _ Total Assessable Acreage = $76,.405.17 - $14,553.37 = $61,851.80 = 337.4428 - $183.30/Acre Construction. cost with overhead of (4) private lights r Total .Assessable Acreage of the (5) benefitted lots = $792.70/Acre. ($34,553.37 _ 18.3593 = $792.70) Energy: Energy costs will be recovered either through a quarterly user fee or a 5 Year Assessment Plan. Quarterly user fees apply to developed lots with an established utility billing account,. whereas the 5 Year Assessment Pian will be applied'to.a'll lots not developed at the time of the final assessment hearing. The energy rates are defined as follows: Ouarterly User Fee (Develooed Lots) Public Lights ($7.65) x (•17 Lights) x (3 months) _ $,390.15 337.4428 Total Assessable Acres = $ 1.16/Acre x 15% Overhead = $ 1.33/Acre/Quarter M Private Lights ($.7.65) x (4 Lights) x (3 months') _ $ 91.80 + 18.:3593 Assessable Acres $ 5.00/Acre x 15% Overhead $ 5.75/Acre + 1.31 _ $ 7.A8/Acre/Quarter 5 Year Assessment Plan (Undeveloped Lots) (132.14 Acres) x (1.38 Acre) x (20 Quarters) c $3#515.00 + 132.14 6.60/Acre PROJECT SCHEDULE Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Construction Completed Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Taxes ASSESSMENT AREA ravandale Center Industrial Park Lots 12 - 15, BlocknI November 9,, 1989 December 5, 1989 December 5, 1989 Summer of 1990 August, 1990 May, 1991 Lots 1-3, 5-11,27-36, 041, 042, 132, 133 Block 2 Lots 1-9', 111,, 141,, 142., Block 3 Lots 15, 062, 171, 191, Block 4 Lots 1-11, 15, 121, 201, 230, Block 5 Lots 1-5, Block 6 Lots 1-12,. 140, 141, 151, 171, Block 7 Lots 1-5, Block 8 Outlot 1 EanwndaleCenter industrial Park i7 Lots 1,2,4, 03,1„ Block 1 Eagandale Center Industrial Park #8 Lots 021,, 022', 3, 4, Block 1 Eagandale Office Park Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Lots 1-3,, Block 3 Eagandale office Park 2nd Lot 1, Block '1 Lots 1-4,, Block 2 Eagandale Office .Park 3rd Lots 1-3, Block 1 Eacandale Office Park 4th Lots,1 & 2, Block 1 Eagandale Center Ist Addition Lots l & 2, Block 1 Section 3 Parcel 010-02 010-03 020-03 010-05 Registered Land Survey 447 Tracts C q i3 CAP'FURNISHED !Y',POLE SUP.PLIER B city of eagan. PUBLIC !< WORKS n DEPARTME COBRA -MEAD" DESIGN un -BIDE box, DESIGN OR 'SHOE DOX4 DESIGN Pole Setting Depths: Poll LWptn Setting Depte A B 30, 50.0" 55, W -O" •I' 6,'0" NOTE% M.P.S. LUMINAIRES OFFERED 150WATT 250 WATT 400 WATT NOTE I.' To assure that poles remoin straight, extreme core must be taken during the backfill tamping process 2 Whenpoor Compacting soil is encountered o special Blass Y type backfill material shall be used. 3 Fixture mouhling and Wiring., see monufaelurer instructions.. COM,MERGIAL STREET LIGHTING WITH FIBER GLASS POLE EXHIBIT "A" standard approved plate tF% 2-89 1 720 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGRTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY,NOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE ONE IPROPERTT I I I I I I IEAGANDALE CENTER ') I r ILot 12, Block 1 ILot 13, Block 1 ILot 14, Block 1 ILot = 15, Block 1 ILot 1, Block 2 Itat 2, Block 2 Itot 3, Block 2 Itot 041, Block 2 Itot 042, Block 2 ILot 5, Block 2 ILot 6, .Block 2 1Lot 7, Block 2 ILot 8, Block 2 ILot 9, Block 2' ILot 10,Block 2. AREA I I I I I ' S.F. ACRES I I INDUSTRIAL PARK 94,032 91,347 92;380 92,172 52,492 44,640 63,032 23,234 20,326 63,560 43,560 43,560 44,148 43,560 43,560 2.1587 2.0970 2.1208 2.1160 1.2051 1.0248 1.4470 0.5334 0.4666 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0135 1.0000 1.0000 1 5 YEAR 1 I IINSTALLATION COST I TOTAL ' I ASSESSMENT QUARTER I I I 1 .ASSESS. I ENERGY COST I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I I I I COST I I I I I IRATE/ACRE I S I I IRATE/ACRE I S I I s I I 1 1.33/ACRE I I I I 26.60 0.71 1 [ 57.46 1 183.3 I 395.69 I I 453.11 1 I 26.60 1 1:33/ACRE 55:78 I' 183.3 384.38 1 440.16 i 26.60 1.36 1 183.3 388.74 1 388.74 1 26:60 56.29 1 183.3 387.86 1 444.15 1 1 1 26.60 I 1 183.3 I 220.89 1 220.89 1 1 26.60 1 1833 187.85 1 187.85 1 1 26.60 1 183.3 265.24 1 265.24 I 1 26.60 1 183.3 97.77 1 97.77 1 26.60 1 183.3 85.53 I 85.53 1 1 26.60 1' 183.3 181.30 I 183.30 1 26.60 1 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 1 26.60 I 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 I 26.60 1 183.3 185.77 I 185.77 1 1 26.60 •' 1 183.3 183.30,1 183.30 1 1 26.60 1 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1 1989 I 1 I I IUTILITT BILLING I I IEMERGT COST PER QUARTER I I I I RATE/ACRE I COST S I 1 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I 1 I 1.33%ACRE I L33/ACRE 2.82 I 1 1.33/ACRE 0 1 I 1 1.33/ACRE I 1.60 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.36 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.93 1 1 1.33/ACRE 0.71 1 1 1.33/ACRE 0.62 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33 1 1 1:33/ACRE 1.33 I 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.36 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33 I 1.33/ACRE 1.33 1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT N0. 574 .ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY ROME ,HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE 3NO ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY PROPERTY AREA 5 YEAR 1110STALLATION COST I TOTAL 1 1989 ASSESSMENT ASSESS. ENERGY COST COST �. �. UTILITY BILLING _ ENERGY COST PER WARTER S.F. ACHES RATE/ACRE S RATE/ACRE S I S RATE/ACRE COST S Lot 11, Block 2, 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33.E - Lot 132, Block 2 65,341 1.5000 26.60 • 183.3 274,95 274.95 133/ACRE 2.00 Lot 133, Block 2 5,200 0.1194 26.60 • 183.3 .. 21.89 21.89 133/ACRE 0.16 Lot 27, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 .l IN Lot. 28, Block 2- 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 29, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 133/ACRE 1.33 Lot 30, Block-2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 18330 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 31, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 193.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 32, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 18330 133/ACRE 1.33 Lot 33, Block 2 1 43,560 1.0000 1 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 133/ACRE 1.33 Lot 34, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 35, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACBE 1.33 Lot 36, Block 2 43;560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 18330 183.30 1.33/ACRE. 1.33 Lot 1, Block 3 76,240 1.7502 26.60 • 183.3 320.81 ISee below Io (Priv. Lts.) 1 76,240 1.75022 26.60 7.92.7 1,387.38 1,708.19 7.08/ACRE 12.39 Lot 2, Stock 59,662 1.3697 26.60 • 183:3 251.07 ISm-below I (Priv. 'Lts.) 1 59,662 1.3697 26.60 • 792.7 1,085.76 1,336.83 7.08/ACRE 9.70 Lot 3, Block 3 1 45,000 1.0331 26.60 • 183.3 189.37 189.37 1.33/ACRE 1.37 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 9 Energy charge assessed an 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT N0. 574. ALL OF SECTION 3 PEST OF 1.35E EXCEPT COUNTRY HOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE 111REE IPROPERTT I I I I I ILot 4, Block 3 ILot 5, Block 3' ILot 6, Black 3 LILot 7, Block 3 'ILot 8, Block 3 ILot 9, Block 3 (lot 111-03 (Lot. 141-03 ILot 142-03 ILot 15, Black 4 ILot 062-04 1 Ilot 171-04 ILot 191-04 1 ILot 1, Block 5 ILot 2, Block 5 AREA. I I I S.F. 5 YEAR ASSESSMENT ENERGY COST I I I ACRES IRATE/ACRE - f (INSTALLATION COST I I I I I I I I I I IRATE/ACRE t I I TOTAL ASSESS. I COST I I I I f I -1 I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 I I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 1.37 I I 183.3 189.37 I 169.37 I I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 I 1.33/ACRE I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I 45,6DD 1.0331 I 26.60 I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 A 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 45,000 1.0331 I. 26.60 I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I I 90,000 2.0661 I 26.60 I 183.3 378.72 I 378.72 I 67,896 1.5587 I 26.60 •' I 183.3 285.71 I 285.71 I 67,896 1.5587 I 26.60 I 183.3 285.71 I I 285.71 I I I I 87,178 I 2.0013 I 26.60 I 53.23 I 163.3 I 366.84 I I 420.07 I I I I 145,700 I 3.3448 I 26.60 88.97 I 183.3 613.10 I I 702.07 I I I I 130,677 I 2.9999 I 26.60 I 79.8 I 183.3 549.88 I 629.68 I 564,512 12.5003 I 26.60 I 183.3 2,291.30 I I 2,291.30 I I I I 435,600 I 10.0000 I 26.60 I I 183.3 1,833.60 I 1,833.06 I I 217,800 5.0000 I 26.60 I 183.3 916.50 I 916.50 • Energy charge Nlll be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 9 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessaent Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PLIRPOSES ONLY 1989 I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I IENERGT COST PER QUARTER I I I RATE/ACRE COST f I I I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I i 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 1 I 1.33/ACRE 1.31 I I 1.33/ACRE 2.75 I I 1.33/ACRE 2.07 I 1 1.33/ACRE 2.07 I 1:33/ACRE R I 1.33/ACRE I f I 1.33/ACRE I B I 1.33/ACHE 16.63 I 1.33/ACRE I 13.30 I 1.33/ACRE 6.65 I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION'3 NEST OF 1-35E ERCEPT COUNTRY'HOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE FOUR PROPERTY AREA 5 YEAR IIMS7ALLATION COST I- TOTAL ASSESSMENT ASSESS ENERGY COST COST S.F. ACRES RATE/ACRE S IRATEIACRE S I S • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. R Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment -Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILI",BILLING _ ENERGY COST PER QUARTER RATE/ACRE COST S Lot 3, 'Block 5 211,832 4;8630 1 26.60 • 183.3 891.39 891.39 ^ Lot 4, .Block 5 99,612 2.2868 26.60 • 183.3 419.17 419.17 1.60 Lot 5, Black 5 75,640 -1.7365 26.60 • 183.3 318.30 318.30 _ Lot 6, Block 5 95,832 -2.2000 .26.60 183.3 403.26 403.26 Lot 7, Block 5 f 95;832 2.2060 .26.60 ' �, 183.3 403.26 403.26 Lot 8, Block.5 93,412 2.1444 26.60 57-04 1 183.3 393.07 450.11 Lot 9, Block 5 76,673 1.7602 26.60 46.82 183.3. 322.64 369.46 Lot 10, Block 5 79;368 1.8220 26.60 48,.47 183.3 333:97 382.44 Lot 11, Block 5 76,673 1.7602 26.60 46.82 183.3 322.64 369.46 Lot 121-05 1 52,492 1.2051 26.60 • 183.3 220.89 220.89 Lot 201-05 1 170,292 3.9094 26.60 • 183.3 716.59 716.59 Lot 236rD5 240,828 5.7123 26.60 • 183.3 1,047.06 1,047;06 Lot 15, Block 5 208;500 4.7865 26.60 4 183.3 877.37 877.37 blot 1. Block 6 33,480 0.7686 26.60 20.44 183.3. 140.88 161.32 Lot 2, 'Block 6 122,347 2.8087 26.60 74.71 1833 514.83 589.54 Lot 3, Block 6 101,887 23390 -26.60 62.22 183.3 428.74 490.96 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. R Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment -Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILI",BILLING _ ENERGY COST PER QUARTER RATE/ACRE COST S 1.33/ACRE 6.47 133/ACRE 3.04 1.33/ACRE. 2.31 1.33/ACRE 2.93 1:33/ACRE 2.93 �. 1.33/ACRE B �. 1.33/ACRE 0 �. 1.33/ACRE B 1.33/ACRE B J 1.33/ACRE 1.60 1.33/ACRE 5.20 1.33/ACRE 7.60 1.33/ACRE 6.37 1:33/ACRE 1.33/ACRE 0 1.33/ACRE B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY HOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE FIVE • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILITY BILLING ENERGY COST PER BUARTER RATE/IICRE [OST f 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACHE PROPERTY AREA 4 5 YEAR 0 IINSTALLATION.CGST TOTAL 1.33/ACRE 3.70 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 'ASSESSMENT 1.33/ACRE 3.74 1.33/ACRE ASSESS. 1.33/ACRE ' I 3.66 ( ENERGY COST COST S.F. ACRES RATE/ACRE f RATE/ACRE f f 1 �- 1 Lot 4, Block 6 131,440 3.0174 26.60 80.26 183.3 553.09 633.35 �I blot 5. Block 6 84,112 1.9309 26.60 5136 183.3 353.93 405.29 Lot 14,Block 7 23,767 0.5456 26.60 14.51 183.3 100.01 114.52 Lot 2,. Block 7 62;620 1.4376 26.60 38.24 183.3 263.51 301.75 lot 3. Block 7 39,060 0.8967 26.60 23.85 183.3 164.37 188.22 Lot 4, Block 7 117,387 2.6948 26.60 • 183.3 493.96 493.96 Lot 5, Block 7 121,107 2.7882 26.60 • 183.3 509.61 509.61 Lot 6, Block 7 120,000 2.7548 26.60 • 183.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 7, Block 7 120,000 2.7568 26.60 • 183.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 8, Block 7 122,552 2.8134 26.60 • 183.3 515.70 515.70 Lot 9, Block 7 121.600 2.7916 26.60 • 181.3 511.70 511.70 blot 10, Block 7 120,000 2.7548 26.60 • 193.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 11, Block 7 120,0110 2.7548 26.60 • 183.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 12, Block 7 120,000 2.7548 26.60 1 183.3 504.95 504.95 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILITY BILLING ENERGY COST PER BUARTER RATE/IICRE [OST f 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACHE IF 1:33/ACRE 4 1.33/ACRE 0 1.33/ACRE 3.58 1.33/ACRE 3.70 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.74 1.33/ACRE 3.71 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.66 PRELIMINARY _ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGNTING PROJECT N0. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1.35E EXCEPT COUNTRY NOME NEIGNTS_ADDITION PAGE SIX IPROPERT7 I I I I I I I I I I I AREA S.F. 1 5 YEAR ASSESSMENT I ENERGY COST I I I ACRES IRATE/ACRE I t IINSTALLATION COST I I I I I I I I I I I IRATE/ACRE S I I I TOTAL I ASSESS: COST ! I I I ! I 11-07 I 184,967 4.2463 I 26.60' • 1 183.3 778.35 I 778.35 I (' j- ILot 141-07 I 144,667 3.3211 I ,26.60 • ! 183.3 608.76 I 608.76 1 ILot 151-07 1 141,980 3.2594 I 26.60 86.7 1- 183.3 597.45 1 684.15 1 ILot 171-07 1 174,427 4.0043 I 26.66 1 183.3 733.99 1 733.99 1 [Lot 1, Block 8 1 143,014 3.2831 ) 26:60 8733 1 183.3 601.79 ! 689.12 [ flot 2. Black 8 I 106,433 2.4434 1 26.60 64.99 1 1833 447.88 1 512.87 1 ILot 3, Block 8 I 95,015 .2:1812 1 26.60 MR I '183.3 399.81 1 457.83 [ ILot 4, Block 8 I 91,760 2.1065 ) 26.60 56.03 1 183.3 386.12 I 442.15 1 ILot 5, Block 8 I 69,280 2.0496 [ 26.60 54.52 1 183.3 375.69 I 430.21 1 Ioutlot 1 I 78,120 1.7934 1 26.60 I 183.3 I 328.73 I I 328.73 I I I IEAGANDALE 1NDUSTRIAL,PARK 97 I I I I I I I ILot I 1, Bl ock,`1 1 .91,050 i 2.0902 I 26.60 • I I 183.3 I 383.13 ! 383.13 ! ILot 2, Block 1 1 296,392 6.8042 I 26.60 • 1 183.3 1,247.21 1 1,247:21 !Lot 031, Block 1 1 256,540 5.8893 I 26.60 I 183.3 1,079.51 I 1,079.51 ILot I 4, Block 1 I I 298,353 (1) 6.8492 1 I 26.60 1 183.3 I 1,255.46 1 I 1,255.46 (1) Includes area of Tract A, RLS X47 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for. these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed.on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these urdeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES GILT I 1989 I 1 I I IUTILITT BILLING I 1 IENERGY COST PER QUARTER I I I I RATE/ACRE COST ,S I I I I 1.33/ACRE 5.65.1 I 1:33/ACRE 4.42 I 1.33/ACRE / 1 1.33/ACRE 5.33 I I 1 1.331ACRE I 0 I I 1.33/ACRE / 1 I 1.33/ACRE 0 ! 1 1.33/ACRE I I 1.33/ACRE 0 1 1.33/ACRE I 2.39 I I I 1.33/ACRE I 2.78 1 1 1.33/ACRE 9.05 1 I 1.33/ACRE 7.83 1 1 1.33/ACRE I 9.11 I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGNTING PROJECT N0. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY NOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE SEVEN ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY IPROPERTY I AREA I 5 YEAR (INSTALLATION COST 1 TOTAL I 1 1969 I ASSESSMENT I I ASSESS. I 1 I I ENERGY COSI COST I I I I I I I I IUi1LITT BALING 1 I I I 1 I (ENERGY LOST PER WIIRTER 1 I I I I I 1 1 S.F. ACRES IRATE/ACRE S IRATE/ACRE S I S 1 I RATE/ACRE COST S 1 1 1, 1 IEAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK #8 C;��ILot 021, Block 1 I 174,255 4..0003 I 26.60 106.41 I 1833 733:25 1 039.66 1 1 1.33/ACRE B B (1-ot 022, stock 1 1 435,328 9.9930 1 26.60 265.84 1 183:1 1,831.86 1 2,097:70 I 1 133/ACRE. ILot 3, Block 1 I. 224,363 5.7307 1 26.60 136.48 I 183-.3 940.46 I 1,076.94 I 1 1.33/ACRE B ILot 4, Block 1 1 140,085 3.2159 1 26.60 85.54 I 183.3 589.41 1 674.01 I 1 1.33/ACRE B I IEAGNNDALE OFFICE PARK ILot 1, Block 7 1 100,050 2.2968 1 26.60 1 183.3 421.00 1 421.00 I 1 1.33/ACRE 3.05 ILot 1, Block 2 I 95,910 2.2018 1 26.60 58.57 I I 183.3 403:59 1 462.16 1, I I I 1.33/ACRE 1 .# I I ILot 1, Block 3 1 201,566 I 4.6732 1 26.60 1 856.60 ISee below I 1 33.09 I(Priv: Lights) I '203,566 4.6732 ( 26:60 I 792.7 3,704.45 1 4,561.05 1 1 7.08/ACRE ILot 2, stock 3 1 215,960 4.9578 1 26.60 1 ISM 90a.76 ISee below I 1 7.08/ACRE 35.10 I(Priv. Lights) 1 215,960 4.9578 1 26.60 I 792.7 3,930:05 1 4,838:81 I 1 6.91/ACRE 34.26 ILot 3, Block 3 1 244,301 S.6084 I 26.60 1 183.3 1,029.02 ISee below 1 1 39.71 I(Priv. Lights) I 1 244,301 I 5.6084 1 1 26.60 I I 792.7 4,445.78 I 5,473.80 1 I I 1 7.08/ACRE I • Energy charge will he bitted quarterly -for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 YearAssessmentPlan for these undeveloped lots. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT MOLL SUMMARY STREEILIGHTING PROJECY NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF I -35E EXCEPT COUNTRY NOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE EIGHT (PROPERTY I AREA I 5 YEAR (INSTALLATION COST I TOTAL I ASSESSMENT I I ASSESS. 'I ENERGY COST I I COST I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S.F. ACRES IRATE/ACRE f IRATE/ACRE S • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan For these urdeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY I 1989 I I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I (ENERGY COST PER I IEAGANDALEOFFICE PARK 29D I I I I I 11 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I I (Lot 7, Black 1 I 294,812 6.7680 I 26.60 180.03 I 183.3 1,21037 I. 1,420L60 I (lot 1, Block 2 I 105,029 2.4111 I 26.60 64.14 I 183.3 441.95 I 506.09 I ILot 2, Block 2 I 257,831 5.9190 I 26.60 I 153.3 1,084.95 I 1,084.95 ILot 3, Block 2 I 242,878 5.5757 I 26.66 148.31 I 183.3 1,,022.03 I 1,170,34 ILot 4, Black 2 I 253,424 5.8778 I 26.60 156.35 I 183.3 1,077.40 I 1,233.75 I IEAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD I I I I ILot 1, Block 1 I 476,902 10.9482 I 26.60 I 183.3 2,006.81 I 2,006.81 I ILot 2; Black 1 I 203;333 4.6679 I 26.60 124.17 I 183.3 855.63 I 970.80 I ILot 3, Black 1 I 331,433. I 7:6087 I I 26;60. 202239'( I 183.3 1,394'.67 I I 1,597.06 I I I IEAGANDALE OFFICE PARK ATH I I I I I I I I I ILot 1, Block 1 I 220,746 I 5.0676 I 26.60 I 183.3 928.89 I 928.89 I ILot 2, Block 1 I 72,794 I I 1.6711 I I 26.60 44.45 I I 183.3 306.31 I I 350.76 I I • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan For these urdeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY I 1989 I I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I (ENERGY COST PER WARIER I I I RATE/ACRE I COST t I I � I I 1.33/ACRE I I 11 I I 1.33/ACRE 0 I I 1.33/ACRE 7.871 I 1.33/ACRE 0 I I 1.33/ACRE I 0 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I 14.56 I I 1.33/ACRE 0 I I 1.33/ACRE I 0 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE � I 6.74 I I 1.33/ACRE I R I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT. ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY HOME_ HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE NINE ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY IPROPERTY I AREA I 5 YEAR IINSTALLATION COST I TOTAL I I. 1989 I I I .ASSESSMENT I I ASSESS. I I I I ENERGY COST I I COST I I I I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I I I I I I I (ENERGY COST PER QUARTER I I I I S.F. I ACRES IRATE/ACRE I f IRATE/ACRE I I f I I I f I I I I RATE/ACNE I LUST f I IEAGANDALE CENTER 1S1 ADDITION I I I I I I I I ILot 1, Block 1 I I 163,097 3.7552 I 26.60 I 183.3 686.33 I 686.33 I I 1.33/ACRE 4.99 I (Lot'2, Block 1 I 174,151 3.980 I 26.60 106.35 I 183.3 732.83 I '839.18 I I 1:33/ACRE B"I d I I I I I I 1 (SECTION 3 I I I I I I I I I IPARCEL 010-02 I I 432;761 I 9.9348 I 26.60 I 264.27 I 183.3 1,821.05 I 2,085.32 ( I 1.33/ACRE B IPARCEL 010-03 I 82,615 1.99661 26.60 I 183.3 347.65 I 347.65 I I 1:33/ACRE 2.52 I IPARCEL 020-03 I 128,960 2.9605 I 26.60 I 183.3" 542:66 I 542.66 I I. 1.33/ACRE 3.94 I IPARCEL 010.05 I I 282;928 I 6.4951 I I 26.60 172.77 I 183.3 I 1,790.55 I I 1,363.32 I I I 1.33/ACRE I I B I I I (REGISTERED LAND I SURVEY 047 I I F I I I I I I . I I I I ITract "C" I I" 59,297 I 1.3613 I 26.60 I 36.21 I 183.3 249.53 I 285.74 I I 1.33/ACNE (TOTAL I 355.8444 I 3516.14 I 25043 76412.4 I 79927.5 I I • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5. Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. STREETLIGHTING PROJECT N0. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA 8 STREETLIGHT LOCATION N.W. 1/4 SEC. 3, T 27 , R 23 ORTATION RIGHT __ ITRANSP OF . :: ElAREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION I I �• ORTATION RIGHT __ ITRANSP OF . :: ElAREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION STREETLIGHTIN„ PROJECT NO. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA d STREETLIGHT LOCATION S.W. 1 /4 SEC. 3, T 27 9 R 23 191- 4 L t-- L� AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR P ND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS 041.07 . �• r:"'/Q.'':;:' .,. :'r�;•p''\ i rtw. .; ` I :'••+..,t�n;.t.}�..;'t.:,�.::;:}, 0117-07 •i.}:::.}:}•::.., 2 :•:f .. 7 ........I ............ 191- 4 L t-- L� AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR P ND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA d STREETLIGHT LOCATION N. E. 1/4 SEC. 3, T 27, R 23 MINNESOTA DEP ARTN�ENT 4RANSPURTATION RIGIiT OF WAY Pl f1T N0. 19=33 010-05 T: 3s :.:.. it I . :6 5 :o :: • �' `� �•:'. •:•::•:::::: � :tii� iiitii::iiit;::littii... •:::: t. J 10.0 , j ti tint°: 4 Oj °iiEiif.^ :•: � :•. • :iii: .:;:E:i: • :. •. O:. '•:::;. .:iiitiiiiii�,iiiiio.'°i�;i"iii°:itiiiit?:iiEiE� ::� .....::::• -5: ii' 1 ii::....... �3f1W :i�s`:i.W�. I• 00 : 0 d Eta„EEF� •i ci"•':i 010-02 7 •iiii 0 .y i J •�•• ••010-03 : � 020-03`: ��a .......... ....,,'...... i:i iiijsii;;��:1•.�,i3iiiiiii 2 ....: iii ::• it' _ `isiii itii.....:i ,,e • F `lr''.. M. AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED,FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS 0 PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION r•\ •'F:iiii NN :- •i':ii':::::. II ki. �•��itii : 0 d Eta„EEF� •i ci"•':i 010-02 7 •iiii 0 .y i J •�•• ••010-03 : � 020-03`: ��a .......... ....,,'...... i:i iiijsii;;��:1•.�,i3iiiiiii 2 ....: iii ::• it' _ `isiii itii.....:i ,,e • F `lr''.. M. AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED,FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS 0 PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION -01 12 -.1 - 1 STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA & STREETLIGHT LOCATION S.E. 1/4 SEC. 39 10279 R 23 [lilt . ......... ...... . .... .... 0-07 ;Xv. A, .................. 1 0^71 I..� . ...... ........ . .. .. .. ............. ........ ...... ..... .. ... I . . ..... 'V .......` 141- 07 iiiii iiiii . ........... ........... Jy ...... ....... 0 1 ..... .. .. ..... ....... zt ... ... . .......... ......... i -m-0 O 4 5 A ........... .......... ....... ...... ....... ......... . .... ....O .......... .:iii i ii .... ............ ... .. ...... MMil .. . ........ . O ................. ..... ..iii I -A - il-tiniiiii. ...... ........ . ...... vo Me. Z:I. ... ......... ..3 . ... ... • r"i ...: ... .....%9N ....... . me ......... m..r. -'m .......... am— .. .... ..... ....... ....... .. .... . .... .............. ...... .... .... . .... V10 "o ........ ..... ....... ....... . % nw; "CE pore Al A, 2 4 '.10... .. ....... 1;1 - I I . . . .. I. ff AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOC TION 4:7-� 14 4 FOND 1;1 - I I . . . .. I. ff AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOC TION 4:7-� 14 4 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PROT. 583/PARK CENTER (STS. & UTIL.) E. Project 583, Park Center (Streets and Utilities) --This project provides for the installation of streets and utilities for the proposed Park Center Addition located west of Cliff Lake Drive and north of Cliff Road across from the Drivers Training Facility. On November 9th, the City Council received the Feasibility Report for this project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on December 5th. Enclosed on pagess(� through q Cf is a copy of that report as prepared by the consulting engineering firm of Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). All notices have been sent to, all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. In addition, extensive, discussions have been held with the developer, Federal Land Company. While it has been indicated that the City may receive written comments, pertaining to the proposed allocation of the costs associated with this project, the staff has not received any at this time. When received, they will be forwarded to the Council's attention as soon as possible'for further review. After a formal presentation of the proposed improvements by the consulting engineer, the staff will be available to answer any further questions pertaining to this proposed improvement. It is anticipated that the final plat for this project will be processed at the December 19th meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close thepublic hearing and approve/deny Project 583 (Park Center Addition -Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. SS FEASIBILITY STUDY EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 583 PARK CENTER SEH FILE NO. 90096 OCTOBER 26, 1989' I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that i am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of 'Minnesota. DATE: 10-26-89 REEG, G. NO. 1'5538, REVIEWED BYL ,�T_D •/ l . w,4 71 DATE': /)-77_-&!7 y S( SEN ENGINEERS / ARCNREl75 /PLANNERS 222 EAST. LITTLE CANADA, ROAD,. ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612494 0272 October 26, 1989 RE': EAGAN, MINNESOTA PARK CENTER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 583 SEH FILE NO. 90096 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,. MN 55121 ATTN: Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works Enclosed is our report for the construction of public improvements for Park Center. The proposed improvements are feasible and will benefit the properties served. Estimated costs and a preliminary assessment roll are included in the report'. We will be pleased to meet with you and any interested parties, at your convenience, to. discuss the content of the report. Sincerely, Jim Eulberg, P.E. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional En ineeruunder the laws of the State of Minnesota,. (4W& Jixfi Eulberg, P..E. Date - _8 Reg. No. �5 S Approved by: Aa'-� Dep rtment of Pu i Works SNORT EC107 ,ENDRIC60N INC. -Date: tt ST PAUL, MINNESOTA S7 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE/CERTIFICATION TRANSMITTAL LETTER TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISCUSSION EASEMENTS AND PERMITS PROJECT AREA COST ESTIMATES ASSESSMENTS REVENUE'SOURCES PROJECT SCHEDULE APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLE FIGURES 1 LOCATION MPTP 2 PROPOSED 'SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 3 PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STREETS AND STREET LIGHTS 4 PROPOSED STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT MAP 5 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 'WATERMAIN AND STREET ASSESSMENT MAP 6 TYPICAL STREET SECTION S-9 SCOPE This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer watermain, "storm sewer ,and streets to serve the proposed Park Center development (see Drawing No. 1). Included in this project is a large amount of grading for both the pond AP -50 and the street.. The Park Center site is approximately 21.25 acres and is located at the northwest corner of Cliff Road (Co. Rd. 32) and Cliff Lake Road. The area is currently 'zoned PD (Planned Development,). The land to the north of the parcel is City Park the' balance of the adjacent land is currently developed as commercial property or is anticipated to be developed for commercial purposes. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our study, it is concluded that: 1. The total estimated project cost is 5631,489.00. 2. The project As feasible from an engineering standpoint and will benefit the properties served. 3. The proposed project is in accordance with the City's master street and utility plans. 4:, it is recommended that the project be constructed as proposed herein under a single contract. DISCUSSION Sanitary 'Sewer The sanitary sewer as proposed as, a part of the project is shown on Drawing No. 2. Included are the 8" laterals necessary to serve the parcels together with additional service stubs to serve Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2. Service to Lot 2., Block i will be provided via a stub out of the manhole in the northeast corner of Park Center Drive. Watermain The proposed 6'" and 8" watermain is shown on Drawing No. 2. The watermain consists of a loop running in Park Center Drive with, stubs provided for future looping of service in Lot 2., Block 1. Water service stubs are proposed off the existing watermain to serve both Lot 1, Block l and Lot 1, Block 2. Storm Sewer This project is in the Gun Club Lake Water Management Organization jurisdiction. The easterly 8.4 acres of the this development drains into pond AP -25, located northeast of the development, the westerly 12.8 acres drains into pond AP -50 as indicated on Drawing No. 3. As part of this project, pond AP -50 will be upgraded to include approximately 4 acre feet of wet pond' volume for purposes of nutrient removal. The total volume required per information supplied by the City, is 9.2 acre feet. For purposes of this report., it has been assumed borrow material will be available on site and material removed as a result of the construction of the pond can be disposed of on site. Streets Park Center Drive will provide internal circulation to the Park Center Development. 'The easterly entrance to Cliff Road is proposed to be barricaded and a temporary cul-de-sac there until the County completes its upgrade of Cliff Road (Co..Rd. 32). The westerly entrance of Park Center Drive is proposed to be four lanes in ( 50' ) width, two in and two out to provide for sight turn lanes. The north segment is proposed as two lanes with a third serving as a turn lane (38') and the east segment is proposed as two lanes (;34'). For purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the select granular fill for the road has to be imported. if suitable material is available on site some savings could be expected. Street Lights The two interior street lights would be the "shoe box" design with 150 watt high pressure sodium luminaire mounted on 18' standard poles. The two street lights at the intersections with 5' - O Cliff Road (Co. Rd. 32) would be conventional intersection street lights with 250 watt high pressure sodium "shoe box" type .fixtures mounted on 30' fiberglass poles with, 6' aluminum mast arms. The energy ,needs for Park Center are serviced by Dakota Electric Association. They offer the type of street lighting poles, lighting fixtures and necessary maintenance service required by the City of Eagan's Street Lighting Policy. Both types of lighting are proposed to be installed by Dakota Electric. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS It is anticipated that all right-of-way and easements will be acquired at no cost to the City. The developer of Park Center will dedicate the necessary right-of-way and easements on the final plat.Additional easement will be required for pipe access to pond AP -25, it is anticipated that it will be acquired as a part of the pond easement description which is currently underway. In addition to normal City permits, other regulatory agency permits anticipated to be necessary includes the following: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Minnesota Department of Health - Watermain Extension Permit Dakota County Highway Department Right -of -Way Permit PROJECT AREA The following properties would benefit by this improvement and are proposed to be assessed: After Platting: Current Parcel Numbers for Park -Center Notification Process: Lot 1., Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Southeast 1/4, Section '30 Lot 1, Block 2 Parcel 011-76 Lot 2., Block 2 Outlot A COST ESTIMATE ' Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A, located at the back of this report. The cost estimates include contingency and legal, administrative, engineering and bond costs. A summary of these cost is as follows: Street $344,328;00 Sanitary Sewer, 29,143.00 Watermain 53,167.,00 Storm Drain 192,315.00 Street Lights 12,,536,.00 Total Estimated Cost $631.,489.00 - 7 - �D� ASSESSMENTS Assessable costs will be based upon final construction costs plus related overhead expenses, estimated at 30%, or on the comparable zoning equivalent rate as identified in the 1989 Fee Schedule. They will also be based on the dimensions contained in the final plat recorded at Dakota County. This report contains areas based upon information contained in the preliminary plat. It is proposed that the assessment would be spread over 10 years at a rate determined by the bond sale necessary to finance these improvements. Sanitary Sewer Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed under project 64. Lateral benefit from trunk sewer is proposed to be assessed at the current rate of $15.85 per front foot with a 150 foot corner lot credit being given. All sanitary sewer constructed under this project is considered l;ateial and is proposed to be 100% assessed. It is proposed to assess sanitary sewer on an area basis (excluding ponding areas) to Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2. Block 2 only. Per the request of the developer, Outlot A is proposed to be excluded from the sanitary sewer lateral assessment. W.+—.,.. a .. Trunk area watermain has previously been assessed under project 127A. Lateral benefit from trunk water has been assessed under project 529 for Cliff Lake Road but it has not been assessed for the existing watermain along south, the Cliff Road side. The 1989 rate for lateral benefit from trunk is currently established at 522.70/front foot. The entire south plat line less the 150 foot corner lot credit is proposed to be assessed for lateral benefit trunk watermain. All watermain constructed under this project is considered lateral and is proposed to be 100% assessed. It is proposed to U3 assess watermain on an area basis (excluding ponding areas) to Lots 1 and 2 Block' 1 and Lots 1 and 2 Block 2 only. Per the request of the developer Outlot A is proposed to be excluded from the watermain assessments. Storm Sewer Trunk area storm sewer is currently pending at the single family rate under project 452R, consequently the parcel is responsible for the incremental difference between single family and commercial. This difference is $0.02.7 per square foot, or $1,176.12 per acre based upon 1989 rates. The outlet from pond AP -50 was constructed as a part of project 452. The equivalent cost of the storm sewer system necessary to provide street drainage would be assessed. as a part of the street assessment. The oversizing cost of that storm sewer system and all other public storm sewer and ponding, costs would be considered 'lateral storm sewer-. Lateral storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on an area basis (excluding the ponding area). Street Rahn Road (Cliff Lake Road') has previously been assessed at the rates appropriate at the time. No assessments have been levied for past improvement to Cliff Road. It is proposed to assess 100$ of the street costs to the development. Included in the street assessment would be street grading, street construction, street_ drainage and street lighting. The street costs are proposed to be assessed on an area basis against Lots rand 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2 Block 2, per the developers request Outlot A is proposed to be excluded from the street assessment. The total cost of the sidewalks would be assessed on an area basis the same as the street assessments. The total cost of the street lights together with the energy costs for five years is proposed to be assessed on an area basis., the same as the street assessment. Trunk Assessments Trunk assessment rates will be assessed on the rates in -effect at the time of the.public hearing. Trunk assessment proposed to be assessedas apart of this project are listed 'below: Storm Sewer Trunk area, = difference between the 1989 Commercial/industrial rate and the single family residential rate. $0.027 per square foot = $1,,176,.12.per acre. Watermain - Lateral.Benefit from Trunk Based upon 1989 rate of S22_70/front foot Sanitary Sewer - Lateral Benefit from Trunk Based upon 1989 rate of $15.85/front foot. REVENUE SOURCES The revenue source to cover the cost of this project is proposed to be direct assessment. The following is a summary of the revenue sources: impact on Trunk Item Project Cost Revenue Funds A Sanitary Sewer Lateral cost $ 29,143 S 29,143 Lateral benefit from trunk 28,652 Total $ 29,143 $ 57,795 +$28;,652 - 10 - (-�eS Impact on Trunk Item Project Cost Revenue Funds B Watermain: Lateral $ 53„167 $ 53,167 Lateral benefit from trunk 25,145 Total S 53.,167 $ 78,312. +$25.;145 C Streets: Street grading $199,290 $19.9,290 Street construction 127,1'8'4 127,184 Sidewalk 17,854 17,854 Street drainage 45,304. 45„304 Street lighting 12,536 12,536 Total $402,16'8 $402,168 -0- D Storm Sewer: Lateral cost $ 50,437 $ 50,437 (-Non Street) Pond construction 96,573 96,574 qrA u ea,(e� Trunk mese 21,170 Total $14.7,011 $168,181 +$21,170 TOTAL PROJECT COST $631,489 $706,455 +S74,967 ( 11 0 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report, 11-9-89 Public Hearing 12-5-89 Approve Plans and Specifications 3-6-90 Open Bids 4-3-90 Award Contract 4-17-90 Construction Begins 5-1-90 Construction Completion (substantial) 8-31-90 Construction Completion (final) 9-15=90 Final Assessment Hearing Sept. 90 First payment due with real estate taxes 5-91 SDI APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE `PARK CENTER UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 583. SANITARY SEWER ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE CY 200 17.00 SANITARY SEWER SUBTOTAL +5.$ CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST A - 1 4� 3.400.00 $21,350.00 1,068.00 $22,418.00 6, 725.,00 $29,143.00 EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 640 15.00 9,600.00 STD. 4" DIA. MANHOLE W/ CASTING (8' DEEP) EACH 3 1,050.00 3,150.00 MH DEPTH GREATER THAN 8' DEEP LF 20 55.00 1,100.00 8"' OUTSIDE DROP LF 10 200.00 2,000.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 1 450.00 450.00 4" PVC SERVICE PIPE LF 85 15.00 1,275.00 8" X 4" SERVICE WYE EACH 1 75.00 75.00 CONNECT 4" SERVICE TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 2 150.00 300.00 ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE CY 200 17.00 SANITARY SEWER SUBTOTAL +5.$ CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST A - 1 4� 3.400.00 $21,350.00 1,068.00 $22,418.00 6, 725.,00 $29,143.00 WATERMAIN A - 2 EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE 8" DIP WATERMAIN LF 350 21.00 7,.350.00 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF 1045 19.00 19,855.00 HYDRANT EACH 2 1,,300.00 2,600.00 8" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE - AND BOX EACH 11 475.00 475.00 6" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE AND ;BOX EACH 10 350.00 3,.500.00 FITTINGS LB 700 1.60, 1,120.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING 16" WATERMAIN EACH 4 800.00 3,200.00 ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE CY 50 17.00 850.00 WATERMAIN SUBTOTAL $38,950.00 +'S$ CONTINGENCY 1,948.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $40,898.00 +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. 12,_269..00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $53,1:67.00 A - 2 STORM SEWER DESCRIPTION A. LATERAL - STREET/PRIVA' 12" RCP STORM SEWER 18" RCP STORM SEWER 24" RCP STORM SEWER 36" RCP STORM SEWER 18'" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD 3'6" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD STD. CATCH BASIN W/ CASTING STD. CATCH BASIN W/ CASTING STD. MANHOLE W/CAST.ING B. LATERAL -NON STREET/PUBLIC 12" EST. UNIT TOTAL UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE 30" RCP STORM SEWER LF 320 LF 60 25.00 1,500.00 LF 265 30.00 7•,950.00 LF 70 32.,00 2,240.00 LF 260 45.00 11,700.00 EA 1 500.00 500.00 EA 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 EA 2 950.00 1,900.00 EA 2 1,050.00 2,100..00 EA 4 1,050.00 4,200.00 SUBTOTAL EA 3 $33,190'.00 12" RCP STORM SEWER LF 20 24" RCP STORM SEWER LF 50 30" RCP STORM SEWER LF 320 36" RCP STORM SEWER LF 230 48" RCP 'STORM SEWER LF 60 12" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD EA 1 36" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD EA 1 48" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD EA 1 STD. CATCH BASIN W'/ CASTING EA 3 ST -D. CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE W/ CASTING EA 2 SUBTOTAL 25.00 500.00 32.00 1,600.00 35.00 11,200.00 45.00 10,350:00 85.00 5,100.00 300.00 300-..00 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,500.00, 1,500.00 1,050.00 3.150.00 1,,050.00 2,100.00 $36,950.00 EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN,. PRICE PRICE C. POND MUCK EXCAVATION, CY 2,000 5.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 9,000 3..,28 COMMON BORROW CY 3,000 4,.00 SEED W/TOPSOIL AND MULCH AC 1.8 1,500.00 SPLIT RAIL FENCE LF 300 6.00 RETAINING WALL (KEYSTONE) SF 1,200 12.50 POND SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER SUBTOTAL +5$ CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST +30% LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INC. TOTAL ESTIMATED,COST A - 4 10,000.00' 29,250.00 12,000.00 2,700.00 1,800.00 15,.000.00 $ 70,750.00 $140,,890.00 7.0'45.00 $14.7,935.00 44,380.00 S192,, 315, 00 STREETS (100$ CRUSHED) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE(2331) TON EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE (2341 MOD) MOBILIZATION LS 1 160.00 6,000.00 SUBGRADE,PREPARATION RS 10 100.00 1,000.,00 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 2,000 3.00 6,000.00 TEST ROLLING RS 10 100.00 1,000.00 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CY 20:,000 7.00 140,000.00 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 3,500 7.00 24.,,500.00 (100$ CRUSHED) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE(2331) TON 1,015 15.00 15,225.00 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TON 435 18.00 7,830.00 (2341 MOD) BITUMINOUS MAT. FOR MIXTURE TON 80 160.00 12,.800•.00 TACK COAT: GAL 200 2.00 400.00 4" CONCRETE WALK W/ GRANULAR BASE SF 6,540 2..00 13,-080.00 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1,920 7.00 13,440.00 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 20 .15.00 300.,00 SOD W/ 4" TOPSOIL SY 2.,200 2.90 6,380.00 ADJUST FRAME AND CASTING EACH 10 155.00 1„550.00 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 22 125.00 2, 750..00 STREETS $252.,255.00 +5$ CONTINGENCY 12,613.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $264,868.00 +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. 79,460.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $344,328.00 A - 5 �3 STREET LIGHTING Unit Total. Description Unit_ Qty. Price Price 150 W Shoe Box Ea 2 2000.00 $ 4,000.00 Street Light 250 W Shoe Box Ea 2 2000.00 4,000.00 Street Light Subtotal $ 8,000.00 Energy Costs 510.95/light/Mo x 2 lights x 12 mo/yr x 5 yrs =.S 1,314.00 $ 8.90/light/Mo'x 2 lights x 12 mo/yr x 5 yrs = 1,068.,00 Subtotal $ 2,382.00 Street Lights and 5 Year Energy Cost $ 10,382.00 +5% Contingency Estimated Construction Cost +15% Legal, Administrative, Eng. and Bond Interest Estimated Cost TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST A - 6 579.00 10,901.00 1.635.00 $ 12,536.00 $631, 489.00 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PARK CENTER UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 583 A. SANITARY'SEWER LATERAL PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA (ACRES) RATE/ACRE PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1; BLOCK 1 0.99 0.99 $2,289.32 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.67 9.87 2,289.32 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 2,289.32 LOT 2,, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 2,289.32 OUTLOT A 6.82 0 2„289.32. 19.55 12.73 B 1 1 ( o TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 2,26'6.42 22,595.56 2,151.96 2,129.66 —6— $29,143.00 B. SANITARY SEWER, - LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK PARCEL PARCEL_ ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA (ACRES') PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1„ BLOCK' 1 0-99 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.87 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0::94 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 OA9 OUTLOT A 6.8.2 19.55 -0_99 9.87 0..94 0..93 0 12.73 B - 2 ASSESSMENT RATE/ACRE $2,250.77 '2„250.77 2,250.17 :2,250.77 2,250.77 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 2,228.27' 22,2'15.14 2,115.73 2j 093.22 -0- S28..652.36 C. WATERMAIN,LATERAL PARCEL PARCEL DESCRIPTION AREA PARK CENTER PLAT: ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TOTAL AREA (ACRES) RATE/ACRE ASSESSMENT LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 0.99 $4,176.51 $ 4,134.75 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.67 9.87 4,176.51 41,222.17 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 4,176.51 3,925.92 LOT 2,, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 4,176.51 3,884.16 OUTLOT A 6.82 0 4,176.51 -0- 19.55' 12.75 $53,167.00 B - 3 1$ D. WATERMAIN -LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT' DESCRIPTION AREA AREA,('ACRES) PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.87 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 0.93 OUTLOT A 6.82. 19.55, 0.99 '9.87 0.94 0.93 0 12.73 B - 4 ASSESSMENT RATE/ACRE $1,995.27 1,975.27 1,975.27 1,975.27 1,975.27 TOTAL ASSESSMENT S 1,955.52 19,495.9.6 1.856.76 1,837.00 -0- $25,145.24 E. STREET PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA (ACRES) RATE/ACRE LOT 1:, BLOCK 1, 0.99 0.99. 31,592:.14 LOT 2, BLOCK '1 9.87 9,.87 31,592.14 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 31,592.14 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 31,592.14 OUTLOT A 6.82 0 19.55 12.73 a B — 5 10 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 311.276.22 311,.814.47 29,696-62 29,380.69 —0- $402,168.00 F. :STORM SEWER LATERAL PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA*(ACRES) PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 LOT 2., BLOCK 1 9.87 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 LOT 2,, BLOCK 2 0.93 OUTLOT. A 6.82 19.55 *Excludes ponding area. 0.99 9.87 0.94 0.93 5.27 18.00 Acre 4SSESSMENT TOTAL RATE/ACRE ASSESSMENT $8,167.28 $ 8,085.61 8,167.,28 80,611.03 8,167.28 7,677.34 8,167.28 7,595.57 8,167.28 43,041.55 $147,011.,00 G. STORM SEWER TRUNK BLOCK 1 PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DESCRZPTION AREA AREA*(ACRES) RATE/ACRE PARK CENTERPLAT`: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 0.99 $1,176.12 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.87 9.87 1,176.12 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 1,176.12 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 1,,1.76.12 OUTLOT A, 6.82 5.27 1„376:..12 18.00 Acre *Excludes ponding area. B - 7 -TOTAL ASSESSMENT. $ 1,164.36 11,608..30 1,105.55 1,093.79 6.198.18 $21,170.15 is PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY PROJECT #583 PARK CENTER PARCEL DESCRIPTION PARK CENTERPARK CENTER PARK CENTER PARR CENTER PARK CTR. TOTAL (ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TYPES LOT 1 BLK 1 LOT 2 BLK 1 ILOT 1 BLK 2 LOT 2, BLK 2 JOUTLOT A A. SANITARY SEWER $ 2,266.42 $ 22,5.95.56 $ 2,151.96 $ 2,129.06 -0- $ 29,143.60 LATERAL B. SANITARY SEWER 2;228.27 22,215.14 2,115.73 2,093.22 -0- 28,652.36 TRUNK BENEFIT LAT. C. WATERMAIN LATERAL 4,134.75 41,222.17 3,925.92 3,884.16 -0- 53,167.00 Do D. WATERMA•IN TRUNK 1,.955.52 19,495.96 1,856,76 1,831.00 -0- 25,145.24 Vi BENEFIT LATERAL E. STREET 31,276.22 311,814.47 29,696.62 29,380.69 -0- 402,168.00 F. STORM SEWER LAT. 8,085.61 80,611.03 7,677.24 7,595.57 43,041.55 147,011.00 G. STORM SEWER TRUNK Vp ? ra de 1,164.36 11,608.30 1,105.55 1,093.79 6,198.15 21,170.15 TOTAL $51,111.15 $509,562.63 $48,529.78 $48,013.49 $49,.239.70 $706,.456.75 is , IIHU wa[w TOR ®� I AANH PARK , V PARK CENTER P. O U T LOT A i I B L O C K I [; C%a[f PARK [XO AUU I I CI IH TAKE CkNIXk T1_ II / LUT2 LOT I I i I 1 I /rte •� LUT I ' 41 e B L O K 2 Jyl I I�' ..__. CLIfFBQAQ. .-csen:u- - L LEGEND RIEXOTWO Enomm STATE OF 4N I UAKOG COUNTY PI AI ., Ir 11TO/W tEWEAI- SiRccT SAWTARY UVM 0F. WATERMAN ti4 PARK CENTER- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 2 ASO EAGAN. MINNESOTA AND WATERMAIN F, ME B -�. PROJ. NO. 583 0 �IIIF1� 111 �•- � I.YYI �1. 111 ruu .-1111 FL4 FEWE99E MLN Fuc[ IF Elea R6YD>m MED _.. ;t.fF NGAD _ L...:• A p III .. LEGEND A' ■1 TWO PROPOSED SIDEWALK ............... I ilAll UY MN I STORY SEWER _�_ ---0 --- 40-- I .STREET SAMTARY SEWER STREET LIGHT rrraw •II[rnrnlwArLM D 0 Idll(1 IA 1,(IIIN I 1 I9 Al I I PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND STREETS 10(19169 3 v .MIME m CEDAR CLEF tot a COMMERCIAL PARK ]ND ADD WT I CENTER ..... .... .... .... .. . ..... . ..... ..... ..... ...... SD CLjfF ROAD =-STIMATED ASSESSMENT RATES STATE OF UN -ATERAL STORM DRAIN $8.167 / ACRE RAHN PARK ASSESSABLE AREA 2bi II 1 i I CLIFF LAKE CENTRE III L--- — I — I I F DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT It id PARK CENTER ASSESSMENT AREAS 90006 4 "a EAGAN, MINNESOTA AND ESTIMATED RATES tottEnE 6 PROJ. NO. 583 0 U T L 0 T A W�A �Q CEDAR CLIFF LOT i COMMERCIAL _ PARK ]ND ADD LOT CENTER C IEF ROAD ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT RATES STATE OF MH STREET 531.592 / ACRE LATERAL SANITARY SEWER $2.209 / ACRE LATERAL WATERMAIN $4,177 / ACRE ASSESSABLE AREApow RANN PARK DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT P1 ' I� i I: I• . I j PARK CENTER Age" � EAGAN, MINNESOTA I CLIFF LAR NT ! CENTRE I: ASSESSMENT AREAS 000: T SII T5� 66' O R/W R/W 60' C N eQ 50, A II�QB 38: B 9' C 34 i EX. GRD. 1 PARK CENTER DRIVE 1 ;14 I, EX. GRD. B618 C 9 0(-TYP.) /0 3qr >r- 0 r 2 z°1o_ O �D r - L %C CONC. SIDEWALK • 4��TOPSOIL .BORROW �{ �I(TYP.) -Z Q m 6°GRANULAR BASE 0 Z m —1 I/L" 2341 BIT. WEAR COURSE TACK COAT 00Ill(1) L31/2"233,1 BIT. BASE COURSE Fra mn 10"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE000%CRUSHED) .. .COMPACTED SUBGRADE(100% STANDARD PROCTOR) Z WEST SEGMENT OF PARK CENTER DRIVE ® NORTH SEGMENT OF PARK CENTER DRIVE Z co © EAST SEGMENT OF PARK CENTER DRIVE co o �o Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PROT 578/SIBLEY TERMINAL IND. PK.(STORM SEWER) F. Project 578, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Storm Sewer) --This project provides for the installation of storm sewer lateral facilities within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park necessary to handle existing and proposed future development and expansion of existing businesses within this drainage district. In response to a. petition received from one of the property owners combined with concerns expressed by the MWCC regarding severe erosion undermining a trunk sewer interceptor, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was presented at the Council meeting of November 9th with the public hearing being scheduled for .December 5th. Enclosed on pages C\, I through _�� is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during the presentation to be provided by the consulting engineer, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. who prepared the report. At the conclusion of the presentation, the staff will be available to address any comments or concerns regarding this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 578 (Sibley Terminal. Industrial Park -Storm Sewer) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications along with easement acquisition through condemnation if necessary. (�6 Report for Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 578 Eagan, Minnesota October 1989 File No. 49499 October 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 578 Our File No. 49499 Dear Mayor and Council: Km A. Gwoon, P.E. Rehab W. Fewer. P.E. Donakl C. BurgaO. R.E. Jerry A Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanan, RE. Ted K. Fk . P.E. Mrcnaer T Raurmann R.E. Roden R, Pkderk, P.E. D" 0 loskora. RE. Thomas W Reierson. R.E. MKhael C. Lynch. RE James R. Maland. R.E. KenneM P. Anderson. P.E. Reim A Bachmann, PE. Mark R. Rook R.E. Roden C. Russek. AI,A Thomas E, Argus. PE Howard A Sanford, P.E. Dan,el J Edgerton. P.E. Mark A. Seip RE, Philp J Casty 11. PE Mark D wallls. RE. ThomasR Anderson. AlA Gary F Rylander RE. Charles A, Erickson Leo M R elsky Haran M Olson Susan M Enerhn. C PA Transmitted herewith is our report for Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Respectfully submitted, BONES R00, R ENE ANDERL�IK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. MAH:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered ofessional E gineer under the laws of the State ;r esot . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. QDate: October 2 1989 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: IM iJ�A r epartment of Pub Works Date: RPT49499 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSJ13 • 612-636-4600 Z Bonestroo Ono G. Bomar oo. PE. Roden W Rosen P.E. Joseph C. Anoedik P.E. / Rosene Branford A. lender¢ RE. R[hard E. Turner, P.E. Anderlik & JamesC Glenn R. Cool,. P.E.E. Thomas E. Noyes. PE. Associates RoWn G. SchunchL RE. Macon L- Sonata. RE. Engineers & Architects October 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 578 Our File No. 49499 Dear Mayor and Council: Km A. Gwoon, P.E. Rehab W. Fewer. P.E. Donakl C. BurgaO. R.E. Jerry A Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanan, RE. Ted K. Fk . P.E. Mrcnaer T Raurmann R.E. Roden R, Pkderk, P.E. D" 0 loskora. RE. Thomas W Reierson. R.E. MKhael C. Lynch. RE James R. Maland. R.E. KenneM P. Anderson. P.E. Reim A Bachmann, PE. Mark R. Rook R.E. Roden C. Russek. AI,A Thomas E, Argus. PE Howard A Sanford, P.E. Dan,el J Edgerton. P.E. Mark A. Seip RE, Philp J Casty 11. PE Mark D wallls. RE. ThomasR Anderson. AlA Gary F Rylander RE. Charles A, Erickson Leo M R elsky Haran M Olson Susan M Enerhn. C PA Transmitted herewith is our report for Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Respectfully submitted, BONES R00, R ENE ANDERL�IK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. MAH:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered ofessional E gineer under the laws of the State ;r esot . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. QDate: October 2 1989 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: IM iJ�A r epartment of Pub Works Date: RPT49499 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSJ13 • 612-636-4600 Z SCOPE': This project provides ,for the construction of additional storm sever to serve Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Lots 1-5, Block 1, Lots, 1, 2, Block 2). Sibley Terminal Industrial Park is located westerly of T.H. No. 13 at the northerly end of Terminal Drive. This project is required at this time due to the proposed development of Hartman"s Office/Warehouse and the expan- sion of Safety Rleen, Inc. In addition, when the undeveloped land in the area develops, adequate storm sewer will be available to serve these developments. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: The affected drainage area is shown on Figure No. 1 attached to the back of this report. The existing storm sewer which presently serves this area includes approximately 450' of 12• pipe constructed in 1970 which conveys storm water from the low point in Terminal Drive westerly. At its discharge, storm water is conveyed overland approximately 800' to Pond CP-8.. The drain- age area tributary to the existing storm sewer is 22.3 acres- Presently the existing drainage area is 20Z developed. Storm sewer proposed herein is required for the following reasons: A. The existing 12' storm sever is capable of conveying, 3-4 cubic feet per second (cfs). Based on present design standards for a 5 year event storm assuming overland drainage exists, the storm sewer should be designed to convey 70 cfa. As a result, the existing storm sewer is grossly undersized based on the drainage area tributary to it. The storm sever has functioned reasonably well because the drainage area tributary to it is not fully developed. RPT49499 Page 1. 93 B. The overland drainage from the discharge point of the existing 12" storm sever to Pond CP -8 has created two major washouts and caused significant erosion into Pond CP -8. In addition, the washout areas are located near a major 42" MWCC trunk sever which in a short time may be impacted'by the erosion. The NWCC has notified the 'City and is very concerned about the erosion. In addition, the inlet capacity of the existing, storm sever in Terminal Drive is not adequate. There- fore, additional storm sever must be extended to Pond CP -8 and from the low point in Terminal Drive to properly serve the undeveloped and developed land. C. The location of the existing 12" storm sever is an the common lot line between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1. Presently, Lot 3 is proposed to be subdivided which would combine the southerly half to Lot 4 and the northerly half to Lot 2. Therefore, the existing storm sever will no longer be located on a common lot line and may be impacted by the future development of Lot 4. Storm sever proposed herein is shown on Figure No.. 1 located at the back of this report. Basically, it is proposed to construct a 481, 36" and 30" storm sever from Pond CP -8 to Terminal Drive. The washed out areas will be filled and graded smooth. it is anticipated that some of the fill material will be excavated from the Pond CP -8 where it :has eroded too. Ditch blocks will be constructed near the NWCC trunk sever to collect overland runoff from Lots 4 and 5. Block 1, It is,proposed to construct the storm sever along the new common lot line subdividing Lot 3. In addition, it is proposed to extend new storm sewer in Terminal Drive to properly collect storm water runoff from the developed and undeveloped land along Terminal Drive. Page 2. RPT49499 Pond CP -8 which presently receives, runoff from this drainage area and others outlet through a 66•,CMP beneath the railroad tracks into Pond CP -9. Pond CP -9 is located in Fort Snelling State Park. Due to the interest in water quality, it may be desirable in the future to construct a two stage outlet for Pond CP -8 to improve the storm water discharge, and water quality into Pond CP -B. The other concern relative to Pond CP -8 is that the existing 549 storm sewer which discharges into it, discharges approximately 12" below the normal water:level (NWL) of Pond CP. -8:. The City in the near future may want to reconstruct the 54, RCP to allow it to discharge at the NWL. EASEMENTS/PERMITS: Permanent drainage and utility easements are required to construct the,storm sewer across Lots 3 and 4,. Block 1. In addition temporary construction easements may be required for the construction of storm sewer adjacent to Terminal Drive. The estimated permanent drainage and utility easements across Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 are listed below: This project is located within the lower Minnesota River Watershed District and will require issuance of appropriate permits. PERMANENT EASEMENT Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Lot 3, Block 1 13,000 sq.ft. Lot 4,, Block 1 12,000 sq.ft. COST ESTIMATES: Detailed'cost estimates are presented in Appendix A ,located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingencies and all related overhead is $195,880. Overhead costs are estimated at;30Z and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. Page 3. RPT49,499 qJ E AREA TO BE:INCLUDED ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA Siblev'Terminal Industrial Park Lot -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 1 Lot 1, 2, Block 2' ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property as shown on the attached drawings. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based .on final costs. These assessments will be spread over 10 years at an interest rate based on the bond sale financing this project. Storm.Sewer: Storm sever proposed herein is lateral and is proposed to be, assessed on an area basis. The benefited drainage area proposed to be assessed is shown on the drawing located at the back of this report. The estimated assessment rate per acre is $7,829 or $0.18 ,per square foot. - I Page 4. RPT49499 0 REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below: Storm Sever Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $195,880 Lateral Assessment $195,880 $195,880 $195,880 - 0 - PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing ApprovePlans and Specifications open Bids/Award Contract Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment, Due with Real Estate Taxes RPT49499 Page 5. November 9, 1989 December 5, 1989 Spring, 1990 Spring, 1990 Summer, 1990 September, 1990 may. 1991 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARR Item 48" RCP Storm Sever 3'6" RCP 'Storm Sever 30" RCP 'Storm Sever 24" RCP Storm Sever 21" RCP Storm Sever 18" RCP Storm Sever Manhole with casting Catch basin v/cstg. 48" RCP apron v/trash guard Improved pipe foundation Mechanical trench compaction Rip rap B618 concrete curb E gutter Bituminous street repair Pond Excavation Common borrow Topsoil borrow Fiber blanket Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer Sod STORM SEVER PROJECT NO. 578 Total + 5Z Contingencies Total Unit Unit Quantity L.F. 130. L.F. 370 L.F. 940 L.F. 150 L.F. 630 L.F. 60 Ea. 9 Ea. 6 Ea. 1 L.F. 500 L.F. 2,280 C. Y'. 15 L.F. 100 S.Y. 300 C.Y. 1,000 C.Y. 3,600 C.Y. 400 S.Y. 850 Ac. 3.0 S.Y. B00 Total + 5Z Contingencies Total Price Cost $ 62.00 $8,060.00 58.00 21,460.00 40.00 37,600.00 30.00 4,500.00 28.00 17,640.00 26.00 1,560.00 1,200.00 .10„800.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 1.00 500.00 1.00 2,280.00 100.00 1,500,40 10.00 1,.000.00 20.00 6,000.00 3.00 3,000.00 3.00 10,800.:00 8.00 3,200.00 2.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 2.00 1.600.00 $143,,500.00 7.,180.00 $150,680.00 +302 Legal, Engineering, Admin.,, 6 Bond Interest TOTAL Page 6. RPT49499 45,.200.00 $195,'880.00 Parcel Description PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROIL SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARR STORM SEVER PROJECT NO. 578 Total Assessable Lot Drainage Area Area 'Acres (Acres) Siblev Terminal Industrial Park Lot 1, Block 1 4.21 Lot 2, Block 1 5.16 Lot 3, Block 1 4.01 Lot 4, Block 1 5.48 Lot 5, Block 1 4.64 Lot 1, Block 2 4.08 Lot 2, Block 2 4.12 TOTAL 3.10 2.54 4.79 3.23 4.08 4.12 25.02 Page 7. RPT49499 Rate/Acre $7,829 $7,829 $7,829 $7,829 '$7,829 $7,829 $7,829 u Assessment. $24,270 19,886 24,739 37,501 25_,287 31,942 32.255 $195,880 Cyl% O ¢ NORTyK,ES�R� R4/4,?O AO EXISTING WASHOUTS TO BE FILLED AND GRADED II ER INAL INosTRIAL PARI } EX. 4 MWCC SEWER DITCH BLOCK 5 7 EX. 1 TERM/ SEWE �R s ABANI GP -;8 O NO 2i - I I O 6 5 4 M PROPO STORM 32-02 2 TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 13 12 4 STORM 0 BE DRAINAGE AND ASSESSMENT BOUNDRY Sibley Terminal Ind. Park Storm. Sewer Improvements Eagan, Minnesota Proj. No. 578 D c� EX. 66" STORM ✓OyNSON 1 v PN Ld v 0 200 400 Scole in feet Bonestroo Engineers &Arehneeli Rosene tt� Anderllk A Aesocletes Date: 10/12/89 Comm. 49499 W. Plaut Mlnne.ele Fig. No. 1 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PROPERTY TAX LEW11990 G., Proposed Property Tax Levy Certification for 1990 --Each year the City certifies a property tax levy to Dakota County to provide a major source of revenue for the ensuing operating year. A certification of property tax for payable 1990 will fund a portion of the general fund,,provide an appropriation to the street construction fund, provide funding for the equipment revolving account and retire principal and interest debt obligations for previously approved community referendums. The total levy for 1990 is proposed at $9,725,012. The following is a breakdown of the proposed levy: General Fund is proposed at $7,824,060. This includes a tax levy increase of $74,410 from 1989 and also includes the amount shifted from local government aid to property tax totaling $1,361,532. This amount of LGA will no longer appear in the City budget as a transfer aid from the State of Minnesota. The City's entire amount of transfer aid was distributed proportionately to our three (3) school districts located within the City, and they are required to, reduce property taxes, by that amount: This action is the result of the special legislative session held earlier this fall, and there is no net impact on total property tax as a result of the LGA transfer aid. shift.' The only net increase in property tax to the homeowner will come as a direct impact of the homestead tax credit relief, again a decision of the legislature, and any increases that any of the jurisdictions are proposing for 1990, such as the City's $74,410. It is anticipated with increased valuation that the $74,000 will not cause any increase in the tax capacity rate. Road.and Bridge Fund is budgeted in the amount of $442,802. 'These funds have been set aside as part of the general property tax levy for the street construction fund each of the past ten (10) years. The funds go toward funding a portion of the Citywide sealcoating maintenance program, participation in. the construction of semaphores, funding of oversizing City collector roads, participation in County highway construction and general maintenance where reconstruction is required. Eouinment'RevolvingFund is a special fund the ,City has established for the purpose of funding its major capital equipment purchases, such as snowplows, front end loaders, fire pumper trucks. and other related equipment. By separating the large capital equipment items .from the general fund operating budget, the City can utilize equipment certificates as a revenue source, given the; tight levy limit restrictions, and provide yearly continuity in the operating budget accounts. \ol Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting Debt Service includes special levies for the principal and interest to retire debt on three (3) fire stations, the 1954; park acquisition development referendum and, the referendum that authorized the construction of the Municipal Center building. For a copy of the resolution adopting the levy for 1989 real estate taxes, refer to page lam• The 1990 proposed General Fund Operating Budget will also be presented for input by residents and the City Council. The proposed General Fund Operating Budget for 1990 is $10,767,130, an increase from the 1989 budget that was $10,495,780. The 1990 General Fund Budget attempts to maintain a constant level of service to existing residents while meeting the service demands of a 5% to 10% increase in new households and population. The budget also has made certain revisions to allow for normal inflationary adjustments. SUMMARY The proper action regarding the public hearing portion of the tax levy certification is to hear any and all input from residents, close the public hearing and approve the resolution certifying the property tax levy to Dakota County for 1990. It is recommended that the 1990 General Fund Budget not be adopted until the December 19 City Council meeting, allowing for any public inspection of the budget document as presented and final revision if appropriate by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To close the public hearing and authorize property tax levy certification to Dakota County for collectible 1990, and 2) continue the proposed 1990 General Fund Budget to the December 19 meeting for final ratification. SPECIAL NOTE: There will be a handout for distribution to the residents who are present at the public hearing explaining the property tax levy certification and an outline of the proposed 1990 General Fund Budget. A copy of, that handout will be distributed on Monday as a part of the Administrative Agenda. RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN LEVY.OF 1989 REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was held on December 5, 1989 at 6.:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center, all members being present except , and WHEREAS, upon motion by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby is on record approving and certifying the levy of 1989 Real Estate Taxes for Eagan, Minnesota, which taxes are payable in 1990 as follows: General Levy (Levy Limit): General Fund Road & Bridge Fund Equipment Revolving Fund TOTAL GENERAL LEVY Special Levies: Debt Service TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES GRAND TOTAL LEVY Dated: December 5. 1989 $7,824,060 442,802 262,150 $1,196,000 $8,529,012 $1,196,000 59,72b.,-012 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN ATTEST CERTIFICATION I, E. J. Vangverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 5th day of, December, 1989. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan X03 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting WRIM § REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT/JIM HORNS A. Request for Reimbursement, Kingswood Addition/Jim Home, Park Dedication/Application Fees --A request was submitted to the City Administrator by Home Development Corporation at the October 16, 1989 meeting requesting reimbursement of fees paid to the City of Eagan for park dedication, a setback variance and the vacation of drainage easements. The total reimbursement as requested by Home Development Corporation was $5,400. The City Administrator reviewed with the appropriate staff the request for the reimbursement of certain fees, and it is the conclusion and recommendation of the City staff that parkland credit in the amount of $1,470 was satisfied by the Blackhawk Park PUD and, therefore, should be reimbursed to Horne Development Corporation. The staff also concluded that the other fees were usual and customary to other development and the City's development policy and should not be considered for reimbursement. Mr. Horne is appealing the findings of the City Administrator to the City Council. For a copy of the original reimbursement request by Horne Development Corporation, a letter from the City Administrator to Mr. Horne and the request forcoo sideration by the City Council, refer to that correspondence referenced as pages � through ( ZZ . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a formal re- imbursement in the amount of $1,470 as dedication credit for parkland that was previously dedicated to the City as a part of the Blackhawk Park PUD to Horne Development Corporation and further to approve or deny the reimbursement of other fees for parkland dedication, a variance procedure and drainage easements. �o� HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST Horne Development Corporation hereby formally requests reimbursement for fees paid to the City of Eagan on the following basis: A. Park Dedication Fees Kings Wood 2nd Addition was platted as 56 single family lots. Of the 56 lots, 11 were previously platted as Kings Wood, but were primarily included as part of the 2nd Addition in order to accommodate the City's request for a modified road alignment. The staff has required that Park Dedication Fees be paid on all previously platted lots except those two occupied by homes. Our claim is for the refund of the fees paid on the 9 additional previously platted lots in the amount of $4,725.00. B. Aoolication Fees 4 S - Kings Wood A=d Addition had several lots which required a setback variance. At the time of the original platting, we were informed by Tom Lovelace that the setback required was the standard setbacks. Had we known of the larger setback, the variance would have been part of the plat request or the plat may have been redesigned. The separate variance procedure fee was $75.00. In addition, the replat of Kings Wood at the request of the City required the vacation of the old roadway easements as well as the drainage easements. The application fee for each of these was $300.00 for a total of $600.00. C. Conclusion Therefore, it is the request of Horne Development Corporation that they be refunded a total of $5,400.00. �oS .. i City OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 FAX (612) 454-8363 November 15, 1989 JAMES HORNE HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 3850 CORONATION ROAD EAGAN MN 55121 Re: Request for Reimbursement of Fees Paid to the City of Eagan Dear Jim: VC ELLISON Mayos THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Cw+cll Hampers THOMAS HEDGES Cly Admft la EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City C� I have reviewed with the appropriate staff your request of October 16 to reimburse certain fees paid to the City of Eagan for 1) park dedication fees and 2) certain application fees. After review by City staff, the question of alignment of the road leading into the civic center site which caused lot lines to be adjusted in the Kingswood Addition is not a valid reason to defer park dedication. Prior to 1981, parks dedication was paid at the time building permits were issued. The Kingswood 1st Addition was platted in 1964, prior to the time that parks dedication was a requirement. Therefore, it appears that no park dedication has been paid previously and became a requirement of the plat. It has been by policy and practice, to collect park dedication on parcels that have not previously paid a fee and are now being platted or replatted. In those instances where homes or development has occurred, they have not been required to pay when platted or replatted. Therefore, the City, according to policy, is unable to refund the park dedication fee as requested. A second issue is your request for credit on 1.85 acres in the Kingswood 4th Addition. The policy has been to collect on those that have not previously paid a dedication; further, no parcel should have to pay twice. Your representation that a portion of the lots platted in the Kingswood 4th Addition should receive a credit due to a previous satisfaction of parkland dedication as a part of the Hlackhawk PUD is correct. The staff report prepared indicated that 1.73 acres was indeed part of the PUD, or approximately 358 of 4.9 acres should receive a dedication credit calculated as follows: 8 X $525 X 0.35 = Credit in the amount of $1,470. It will be recommended to the City Council that you be refunded this amount. THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer lo(P `LETTER TO MR HORNE NOVEMBER 15, 1999. PAGE TWO The other fees for the variance procedure and easements are a matter of policy and ,practice in all developments and, therefore, would not be a legitimate reimbursable expense. Thank you. for your patience as City staff reviewed these items. Please expect City Council authorization of a parkland credit in the, amount $1,470 for a dedication that was satisfied by the Blackhawk Park PUD several years ago. Sincerely,, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc; Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Tom Colbert, Director ofPublic Works- Ken'Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation TLH/kf. X07 LAW OFFICES LeVander, Gillen, Miller, Anderson & Kuntz 402 DROVERS BANK BLDG. • 633 SOUTH CONCORD ST. • P.O. BOX 296 SOUTH ST. PAUL. MN 550750298 • (612) 451.1831 • FAX (612) 450.7384 November 22, 1989 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 TIM07HY J, KUNTZ DANIEL J. BEESON ROLLIN H. CRAWFORD Re: Horne Development Corporation Request for Reimbursement of Fees Dear Tom: This letter is in response to your letter to Horne Development Corporation dated November 15, 1989, setting out the staff position regarding the request for reimbursement. Please be advised that Horne Development Corporation would like to have this matter considered by the full council at the earliest possible time. If you will notify me of the date when this matter will be considered, I will prepare the information we would like to have presented to the council and will be present at such meeting. Thank you for your thorough consideration of this matter. Very, -truly yours, i oil - in H. Crawford RHC:bjh V A Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting MW A'I3WTES5,, CANCELLATION/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON HUD PURCHASED PROPERTY A. Cancellation of Special Assessments on HUD Purchased Property/Authorize Prepayment of All Outstanding Balances --The Director of Finance has completed an analysis of all special assessments and total cost for acquisition of the HUD parcels which include the athletic site at Lexington and Diffley, as well as a parcel at Daniel Drive and adjacent to Walnut Hill Park. Since special assessments had previously been levied on all three (3) subject parcels, payments were due and payable in 1989. Due to the change of. ownership, the 1989 installment went unpaid and is now delinquent. It is the recommendation of the Director of Finance that the City cancel both the 1989 and 1990 installments, including interest and' penalties to Dakota County, and authorize the, prepayment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. For additional information on this item, refer to a memo entitled "HUD Property Special Assessments" enclosed on pages \ ( 0 through —W prepared by the Director of Finance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) Cancel both the 1989 and 1990 installments of special assessments on HUD purchased property, including interest and penalties due to Dakota County, and 2) Authorize the prepayment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. M1 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 29# 1989 SUBJECT: BUD PROPERTY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS As a part of the purchase agreement executed earlier this year for the purchase of the HUD property, the City became responsible for all special assessments on the subject parcels. In the case of levied assessments the 1989 installment was due to Dakota County as billed on the property tax statements. Because of the change in ownership this installment (1989-) went unpaid and is now delinquent. Also, at this time the 1990 installment cannot be prepaid without City Council action. In my opinion, the best way to handle this situation is for the City Council to approve the following: 1. Cancel both the 1989 and 1990 installments including interest and penalties at Dakota County. 2. Authorize pre -payment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition and Development Fund. This fund purchased the land originally and will receive the proceeds from any sales. The dollar amounts are as follows: Annual Principal Property 1989 1990 Balance Total Athletic Site(1) $26,115.97 $26,115.97 $132,181.12 $184,413.06 (8 Parcels) Daniel Drive(2) 926.32 1,94,0.52 22,, 166,80 25,033.64 Walnut Hill Park 2.954.44 2.954.44 16.998.54 22,907.42 Totals(3') $29,996.73 $.37,010.93 $171,346.46 $232,354.12 (1) These numbers do not include Lot 3, Block 2 of Kensington Place which is being purchased from First Financial Corporation in a separate transaction. (2) Tri -Land Properties has been billed $28,376 for the easement they were required to dedicate to the City as a development condition. (3) Pending and future assessment obligations remain on some of these parcels. It should be noted that this HUD property was all tax exempt, consequently, there are no ad valorem taxes involved and this requested action impacts no other taxing jurisdictions. �_a CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES NOVEMBER 29, 1989 PAGE TWO For your information the total cost for acquisition of these properties from information currently available can be summarized as follows. All costs except assessments were lump sum and are allocated by parcel size: Property Walnut Hill Athletic Site Daniel Drive Park Total Acres 62.97 7.43 10.89 81.29 Percent of 'Total 77.5% 9.1% 13.4% 100.0% Cost Item: HUD $988,125 $116,025 $170,850 $1,,275,000 Legal 2,719 319 470 3,508 Title Ins. 2,151 253 372 2,776 Assessments(l) 184,413 25,034 22,907 232..,354 Total Costs $1,177,408(2) $141,631(3) $194,599 $1,5131,63'8 Cost Per Acre $18,698 $19,062 $17,870 $18,620 (1) Does not include any pending or future assessments and assumes no penalty or interest on the 1989 or 1990 installments. (2) Does not include Lot 3, Block 2 of Kensington Place. (3) 'Does not reflect the $28,376 bill to Tri -Land. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss this matter in greater detail. Y F.ina`ce Director/City Clerk cc: Ken Vraa,, Director of Parks & Recreation Linda Fink, Accountant II Deanna Kivi, Assessment Clerk EJV/jeh l0\ Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting PROPOSED 1990 FEE SCHEDULE B. Proposed 1990 Fee Schedule --Each year the City reviews ,all fees for license permits and other City services to determine whether certain adjustments in the fee schedule are appropriate. The Director of Finance coordinates the review and revision process with all City departments and for additional information on any and all fees that are recommended for an ,adjustment in 1990, refer to a memo and attached fee schedule enclosed on pages—LL3 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny with or without modification, the 1990 fee schedule as proposed. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: DECEMBER•1p 1989 SUBJECT: 1990 FEE SCHEDULE Please find attached a copy of the proposed 1990 Fee Schedule. The schedule has been prepared with the recommended rates. Where rates have changed, the 1989 or previous rate is noted in the right hand margin. Also, miscellaneous notes are included within the proposed fee schedule. Certain of the proposed fees show significant increases while others remain the same and a few are decreased. The recommended fees are intended to cover the City's costs and do not incorporate excessive pricing to take advantage of a non-competitive situation. Areas of particular interest include the following: 1. Plan check fees increase from 50% to 65% per previous discussion and approval. 2. Sewer rates (page 15) increase by 13.6% which is a direct result of the MWCC costs billed to the City-. 3. Water rates (page 15) increase by 3.6%. 4. Park dedication fees (page 17) are increased substantially as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. I believe :the new rates reflect land prices and the method of calculation remains consistent with previous years. These rates do not include any consideration for trail dedication requirements. 5. Numerous new fees are added as services are provided differently or in ways that are billable. Page 17 shows a number of them in the park area. Page 18 reflects additional prices of equipment being used. 6. As shown on page 19, staff is recommending significant changes to escrow deposits. We are proposing that escrows be required on Conditional Use Permits, Rezoning Applications and Waivers of Platting applications. These activities are requiring a great deal of staff and consultant time and, therefore, should be handled consistently with platting requirements. The amount of the required escrow deposit is recommended to be the same as that for a preliminary plat. In addition to adding these three areas, the amounts are proposed to be increased dramatically. The increased amounts reflect costs currently being incurred on these projects and lc3 represent an effort to have the money on deposit prior to bills being paid. This request is based on historical data compiled in the escrow accounting system. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss this proposed fee schedule in more detail. qv Financ' Director/City Clerk EJV/kf CITY OF EAGAN PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 1990 For City Council Review December 5, 1989 �(J LIQUOR FEES FEE TYPE BEER, LIQUOR AND WINE Beer Application and Investigation Off -Sale License On -Sale License Temporary License Liquor Application and Investigation Off -Sale License On -Sale License Sunday License On -Sale Club License Less than 200 201-500 501-1,000 1,001-2,000 2,001-4,000 4,001-6,000 Over 6,000 Temporary (Up to Three Days) Wine Application and Investigation On -Sale License Sunday License Consumption and Display Daily Sports or Convention Duplicate License PROPOSED 1990 FEE $350.00(1) 40.00 175.00 25.00 300.00(2) 200.00 3,500.00 200.00 300.00 500.00 650.00 800.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 150.00 Added in 1989 with code change 200.00(1) 200.00 100.00 25.00 50.00 2.00 (1)When Wine and Beer are applied for by the same applicant, the total maximum investigation fee is $350.00. (2')Also requires an escrow deposit of $1,000.00 for five persons requiring investigation and $200 for each additional if the investigation is conducted within Minnesota, or $2,000.00 for five persons requiring investigation and $400.00 for each additional if the investigation is conducted outside of Minnesota. 1 PROPOSED 1990 FEE TYPE FEE Rubbish Hauler Commercial, Residential or Recycling Only 1st Truck $50.00 Was 40.00 Each Additional 25.00 Was 20.00 Commercial/Residential Combination 1st Truck 75.00 Was 60.00 Each Additional 25.00 Was 30.00 Service Station 50.00 Solicitors (Non -Profit) 25.00 Solicitors (For Profit) 50.00 Investigation License Fee 25.00 up to 3 solicitors 5.00 each additional over 3 Trailer Permit 25.00 Dog License Male or Female 6.00 Neutered or Spayed 3.00 Late Fee 2.00 Duplicate Dog Tag 1.00 New Kennel Permit Initial 50.00 Renewal 25.00 Photocopies .50/page Fee Schedule 2.00 Animal Pick Up 15.00 Was 10.00 Animal Impound 4.00/day over amount billed the City by the animal pound Permit Reissuance Fee 25.00 Was 20.00 Returned Check Fee 10.00 False Alarm Commercial 75.00 Per False Alarm After 6 (City Code) Residential 50.00 Per False Alarm After 6 (City Code) Radio Communications Lease Previously Negotiated Rate New + 5$ y 2 � 11 FEE TYPE Alarm Panel Parade Permit Fee PROPOSED 1990 FEE 8.00/month 25.00 Shows (circus, carnival, etc.) License 25.00 50.00 Investigation Massage Therapy Establishment License Massage Therapist License Accident Photo Police/Fire Reports: Accident Incident (Police and Fire) Gambling Investigation Cigarette License Mechanical Amusement 1-3 Machines 4-15 Machines 15+ Machines 300.00 (includes 1 massage therapist license) 300.00 Investigation (includes 1 massage therapist) 50.00 200.00 Investi atio - Revised in 1989 wi code change 5.00/first print 3.00/print after first 3.00 4.00 first 2 pages .25/additional page 250.00 25.00 25.00 200.00 400.00 Contractors Licenses Plumbing MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Sewer and Water MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Well Driller MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Topographic Maps 6.30/Acre Mailing Labels LOGIS Cost + $10.00 Notary Seal 1.00 Each for first 5 Was .50 .50 each for all additiona Voter Certification 1.00 Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy Golf Driving Range License 3 5.00 50.00 Added in 1989 with new requirement SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING FEE TYPE Final Plat Preliminary Plat Rezoning Planned Dev. PD -Annual Review Conditional Use Permit Variance PROPOSED 1990 FEE $100.00 Require Escrow +$3/lot Deposits Per Development Escrow Policy 300.00 150.00 Was 250 - should not be reduced unless the escrow is added. 250.00 25.00 Initial 150.00 Renewal - CUP 25.00 Waiver of Plat Duplex Lot Splits Others Special Permit Interim Use Permit Grading/Excavation Permits If Preliminarily Platted Not Preliminarily Platted Renewal Utility Permits Utility Companies Permit For Construction in City Right -of -Way Assessment Search Vacation Proceedings Industrial Revenue Bond and Multifamily Housing Bond Processing Fee Market Analysis Study `41 75.00 50.00 150.00 Was 300 -should not be reduced unless the escrow is added 50.00 75.00 Added in 1989 with Code change. Accessory Housing ,Permit Eliminated in 1989 with Code Change 250.00 325.00 150.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 Was 8.00 300.00 500.00 50.00 FEE TYPE- Zoning Map Zoning Regulations (City Code - Chapter 11) Liquor Regulations (City Code Chapter 5) Subdivision Regulations (City Code - Chapter 13) Traffic Regulations (City Code - Chapter 8) Parking Regulations (City Code - Chapter 9) Sign Regulations City Code Each Chapter (All Chapters Except 5,8,9,11,13) Code Book Code Book with Binder City Code Updates Street Name Change Application Comp. Plan Amendment PROPOSED 1990 FEE 5.00 10.00 10.00 Was included below at 5.00 10.00 3.00 3.00 2,.50 5.00 Excludes Chapter 5 now proposed at 10.00 60.00 75.00 10.00 100.00 300.00 INSPECTION FEES FEE TYPE Building Permit Demolition Permit Disposal Permit Electrical Permit Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Moving Permit Plumbing and Gas Fitting Sign Permit Wind Energy, Radio and Television Tower Permit Plan Check (Valuation over $10,,000') Foundation Permit Replacement Building Permit Field Card Lot Transfer Fee (Bldg. Permit) Processing Fee on Cancelled Permits PROPOSED 1990 FEE Based on Value - See Attached' copy of Table 3-A of Uniform Building Code 15.00 10.00 See Schedule Attached See Schedule Attached 30.00 Plus Cost of Repairs and Escrow See Schedule Attached 2.50 per square foot Based on Value - See Attached copy of Table 3-A of Uniform Building Code 65% of Permit Fee Was 50% Based on Value - See Attached copy of Table 3-A of Uniform Building Code - $30.00 Minimum 5.00 New 50.00 15.00 New BUILDING PERMITS CITY OF EAGAN 1990 PERMIT FEES S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS PERMIT FEES - RESIDENTIAL - Fees based on UBC Fee Schedule 65$ Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000. Was 50% Permits are issued to specific lots - any lot change after issuance of permit $50.00 transfer fee. Utility Charges - collected with permit fee Was Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $700.00 675 Water Availability Charge (WAC) - $625.00 580 Water Meter (5/811) - $ 90.00 Road Unit Charge - $355.00 340 Treatment Plant Charge - $252.00 228 $1.00 - $500.00 -- No Permit Required $501.00 - $2,000.00 -- $15.00 for the first $500.0.0 plus $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00. $2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,0.00.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000,00. $25,001.00 - $50,000.00 -- $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus 6.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $50,001.00 - $100,000.00-- $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00. $100,001.00-$500,000.00 -- $639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. $500,001.00 - $1,000,000-- $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00. $1,000,001.00 and Up -- $3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,,000.00 or fraction thereof. All permit fees are rounded to the nearest numerically even dollar amount. 7 �Z Accessory buildings in apartment complexes will not pay MWCC SAC (Per MWCC policy). City SAC, .WAC, Road 'Unit and Water Treatment will be charged at 808 of full value,. STATE SURCHARGE ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS Valuation of Structure Surcharge Addition or Alteration Computation Were Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) -808 of $700 x number of units $675 Water Availability Charge (WAC) -808 of $625 x number of units 580 Road Unit -808 of $355 x number of units 340 Treatment Plant Charge -808 of $252 x number of units 228 Accessory buildings in apartment complexes will not pay MWCC SAC (Per MWCC policy). City SAC, .WAC, Road 'Unit and Water Treatment will be charged at 808 of full value,. STATE SURCHARGE ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS Valuation of Structure Surcharge Addition or Alteration Computation $1,,000,000 or Less .0005 x Valuation $1,000,001 to $2,000,000 $ 500 + .0004 x (Value - $1,000,000) $2,000,001 to $3,000,000 $ 900 + .0003 x (Value - $2,000,000) $3,000,001 to $4,000,000 $1,200 + .0002 x (Value - $3,000,000) $4,000,,:001 to $5,000,000 $1,400 + .0001 x (Value - $4,000,000) $5,000,001 and Up $1,500 + .00005 x (Value - $5,000,000) 8 ��3 1990 CITY OF EAGAN PLUMBING PERMIT FEES TYPE OF FIXTURE Water Closet @ $3.00 Each Bath Tub @ $3,.00 Each Lavatory @ $3.00 Each Shower (Per Head) @ $3.00 Each Sink @$3.00 Each Urinal @ $3.00 Each Bidet @ $3.00 Each Laundry Tub @ $3.00 Ea. TYPE OF FIXTURE Janitor Sink or Receptor @ $3..00 Ea. Water Heater @ $3.00 Each Floor Drain @ $1.50 Each Water StandPipe @ $1.50 Each Gas Pipe Outlets.@ $1,.50 Each Rough Openings -No Openings @$,1.50 Ea Fixtures on Rough Openings @$1.50 Ea PERMIT FEES: it of Contract Fee With a Minimum Fee of .$20.00. State Surcharge is $.50 Per Each $1,000 of Fee (Not the Contract Cost). $12.00 Minimum Fee 1990 CITY OF EAGAN MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES RESIDENTIAL HEATING 01-100,000 BTU's - $24..00, Each (Includes Cooling for New Additional 50.,000 BTU's or Construction). Fraction - $6.00 RESIDENTIAL COOLING $12.00 ('Add on) MODIFICATIONS/ALTERATIONS $12.00 Minimum COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES 1% of Contract Fee with a Minimum Fee of $20.00. State Surcharge is $..50 Per Each $3,000 of Fee (Not the Contract Cost) CITY OF EAGAN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FEES NOTE: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR EACH INSPECTION - $15.00 AL PERMITS REQUIRE S.50 STATE SURCHARGE 1. Payment of fees - All electrical inspection fees are due and payable to the City of Eagan at or before commencement of the installation and shall be forwarded to the City of Eagan. 2. The fees for signs shall be computed in accordance with State schedule with a minimum fee of $15.00 per sign. 3. Swimming pool ground fees shall be computed separately at $40.00 per pool. 4. Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installation, replacement, alteration or repair limited to one inspection only - $15.0.0,. 5. Services-, change of services, temporary services, additions, alterations or .repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed separately. 1 to 100 ampere capacity ..$15.00 101 to and including 200 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ................$18.00 For each addition of 100 amperes or fraction thereof ...........$ 5.00 6. Circuit, installations or additions, alterations or repairs of each circuit or subfeeder shall be computed separately including circuits fed from subfeeders and including the equipment service. Circuits of 250 volts or less. 0 to and including 30 ampere capacity ..........$ 4.00 31 to and including 100 'ampere capacity ........$ 7.00 For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof .... . .. ... ......$ 6.00 For circuits over 250 volts, double the fee for 250 volts or less. 7. In addition to the above fees: a. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each street lighting standard. b. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal head. Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when computing the fee. 8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers an& generators for lights,, heat and power shall be computed separately at $2.00 per unit plus $.10 per RVA up to and including 100 KVA, 101 RVA and over at $.05 per KVA. The maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this category is $20.00. 10 � a S 9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers for signs and outline lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.25 for each additional 100 VA or fraction thereof. 10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed by the initial installer). remote controls, signal circuits, fire warning and security circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00 per first ten openings or devices of each system plus $1.00 for each additional opening. 11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed, installations, there shall be a minimum fee of S100.00 up to and including $30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1/10 of 1$ on any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by persons or firms requesting the review. 12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions have been corrected and such conditions are not the subject of an appeal pending before the Board or any court, a reinspection fee of not to exceed the original unit fee, or $15.00, whichever is less, may be assessed in writing by the inspector. 13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested special inspections or services, the fee shall be $25.00 per man hour, including travel time, plus $.20 per mile traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of material consumed. This section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such other jobs as determi=ned by the inspector. 14. For inspections of transient project including, but not limited to, carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees shall be computed as follows: a. Power supply units - According to Item 4(b) (2) of fee schedule - a like fee will be required on power supply units at each engagement during the season, except that a fee of $25.00 per hour will be charged for additional time spent by the inspector if the power supply is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on the request for inspection as required by law. b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $15.00 per unit. 15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or corporation begin work of any kind such as hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on the next succeeding day where such work is commenced on a Saturday or on a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit, be required to pay double the fees herein- before provided for such permit, and shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance. 16. Additional. Fees and/or Fee Shortage - Additional fees and/or fee shortages must be received by the City within 14 days of written notice. If additional fees and/or fee shortages are not received within 14days of notice, permits for electrical installations will not be accepted by the City until such time as the additional fees and/or shortages are received. Additional fees and/or fee shortages that are not received within 14 days of notice are subject to a 10% per day penalty. ASSESSMENT FEES FEE TYPE Trunk Assessment/Connection Charge Trunk Sanitary'Sewer Oversize Unplatted Platted Residential Trunk Water Main Oversize Unplatted and Platted Comm. & Ind. Platted Residential Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Comm. & Ind. Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize. Single Family Multi -Family Comm. & Ind. PROPOSED 1990 FEE Were $1,435/Ac. $1,365 690/Lot 655 1,450/Ac. 1,380 695/Lot 660 2,285/Ac. 2,115 .:056/S''.;F. .07,0/S.F. . 083/S.,F. Lateral Benefit Assessment/Connection Charge Lateral Benefit from Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main Single Family Multi -Family and Comm. &,Ind. Lateral Benefit from Trunk Storm Sewer 1211 Storm Sewer 1511 Storm Sewer 18" Storm Sewer 21" storm Sewer 24" Storm Sewer 33.10/Centerline Foot 31.70 28.35/Centerline Foot 27.50 46.75/Centerline Foot 45,.40 *37.155/Centerline Foot 3'6.50 *39.00/Centerline Foot 37.90 *41.6'0/Centerline Foot 40.40 *44.75/Centerline Foot 43.50 *51.35/Centerline Foot 49.90 *Rate is based on a pipe at 15 foot depth, cost for additional depth will be reviewed on a case by case basis. 113 I gl Street Assessments Street Surfacing s/Storm Sewer Street Surfacing w/Grading Street Surfacing w/Storm Sewer Street Surfacing w/Grading & Storm Sewer Residential Multiple Comm./Ind. 32' Wide 44' Wide 52' Wide Rate/F.F. Rate/F.F. Rate/F.F. Was Was Was $26.60 $25.50 $48.40 $46.15 $63.90 $61.05 30.20 29.00 56.85 54.40 77.25 74.05 37.90 36.50 62.55 59.90 80.65 77.35 41.50 40.00 71.00 68.15 94.00 90.35 Trails Concrete (5' wide) Bituminous Trail (8' wide) $12.20/F.F. 8.90/F. F. 14 Was 12.00 Was 8.410 UTILITY RATES AND FEES FEE TYPE Sanitary Sewer Single Family, Townhouse and Similar Residential Apartment,, Institutional Commercial & Industrial Sewer only (Sewer with no water connection/meter to measure flow) Water Works All users Water Account Deposit Sewer Account Deposit .Street Light Energy Single Family/Twin Homes (R-1., R-2) Townhouses (R-3-) Multiple Residential & Commercial/Industrial Road Unit Charge Residential Except Apartments Apartments (80%) Comm. & Ind. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Single Family (R1 and R2) Other Treatment Plant Charge Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Single Family Apartments Comm. & Ind. PROPOSED 1990 FEE as MN $15.45/Qtr. for 10,000 13.60 Gal. $1.35/1000 Gal. for 1.17 All Usage Over 10,,000 Gal. Based on Winter Quarter Meter Reading MN $15.45/Qtr. for 10,000 .13.60 Gal. $1.35/1000 Gal. for 1.17 all Usage over 10,000 Gal Flat Rate - $28.95/Qtr. 25.30 MN $'14..5'0/Qtr for 10,000 14.00 Gal. & $.80/1000 Gal. for .77 All Usage Over 10,000 Gal $15..00/Residential Account (Old deposit not pr.eviously'listed) $15.00/Residential Account (Old deposit not previously listed) $2.65 Per Qtr Per Lot $2.10 Per Qtr Per Unit $18.40 Per Qtr Per Billing Acct. $12.60 per light/mth-new category $3'55/unit 284/unit 1,065/acre $700 MWCC 252.00 625/Lot 500/unit 2,285/acre Shut-off Charge 25.00 Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00. as $340 272 1,020 675 228 580 464 2,115 FEE TYPE Late Fee Sewer Permit Water Permit PROPOSED 1990 FEE 10% of Balance $15.00 Was 10.50 15-00 Was 10.50 Construction Meter Permit 10.00 ($100 Escrow Dep.,) After Hours Work. A. Call Out - Labor Rate 2.5 Hr. Minimum + 10% Administrative B. Extended Day Labor + 10% Admin. Water Meter Removal 30.00 Water Meter Replacement 30.00 Sewer Tap 100.00 Water Tap 100.00 Water Meters 5/8" x 3/4" meter* 90.00 3/4 water meter* 120.00 1" water meter 125.00 1'11 water meter 325.00 2'" water meter 455.00 211' compound 970.00 3" compound 1,205.00 4" compound 1,,900.00 6" compound 3,620.00 2" turbo meter 475.00 3" turbo meter 639.85 4" turbo meter 1,075.00 6" turbo meter 2,220.00, #2 copperhorn w/swivel 16.00 Remote wire (over'351) 0.06/Ft Meter Strainers: 211 160.00 3,11 207.00 411 312.00 Meter Testing (Charged only if meter tests correct): '5/8" through 211 50.00 All other sizes Contract Cost (Mpls)+ 10% Meter Box Cover 31.0.0 New related to development Lid to Meter Box Cover 15.00 New related to development Deposit to turn on water before all work is satisfactorily completed 200.00 New * Includes Copperhorn 16 1b\ PARKS AND RECREATION FEE TYPE Parkland Dedication Single Family Duplex Townhouse/Quad Apartments/Multiple Commercial and Industrial Park Fees Picnic Kit Trapp Farm and Thomas Lake Pavilions(1) Enclosed Shelter Buildings(l) Open Shelters Extra Picnic 'Tables (maximum of six) PROPOSED 1990 FEE Was $685.00 525 600.00 488 535.00 414 540.00 427 .05/S.F. (To be recommended by Park Commission after 12-7-89 meeting) 3.00/5:.00 50..,00 Per Day 35.00 1/2 Day 50.00 Per Day Was 35.00 35.00 1/2 Day 15.00 15.00 New Athletic Facilities/Shelters(1) Fields 35.00 Per Field Per Day Lights (If Required) -Tournaments 20.00 Per Field Per Hr Building Cleaning 30.00 Per Day Restrooms/Bases/Field Chalking 15.00 per reservation New Maintenance Fee - Travel Baseball 50.00 Youth/Team New 200.00 Adult/Team New Concession Permit (maximum of 3,) 200.00 Set previously - not listed Community Rooms Events 35.00 Profit and Fund Raising 50.00 Chuckwagon Grill 25.00 Canopy 50.00/Day (1) Requires Damage Report 100.00 17 Was 15.00 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL FEETYPE Maintenance Person Foreman Pick-up truck 1 'Ton dump truck Single axle dump,truck Tandem axle dump truck Tractor Backhoe/loader Front end"loader Road grader Street sweeper Roller Paver Air Compressor 50 KW'Generator Sewer Jetter Sewer Rodder Sewer Vacuum - Trailer Sewer Vacuum - Truck Groundsmaster Mower Pump 6" Pump 8" Skid Loader Chipper PROPOSED 1990 FEE $20,.00/hr. 30,.00/hr. 24.00/hr. 22.00/hr. 23.00/hr. 30.00/hr. 35.00/hr. 15.00/hr. 35.00/hr. 56..00/hr. 56.00/hr. 41.00/hr. 15.00/hr. 20.0,0/hr. 12.00/hr. 3'5.00/hr. 66.00/hr. 33.00/hr. 33.00/hr. 70.00/hr. 22.00/hr. 25.;00/hr. 28.00/,hr. 35.00/hr. 15.00/hr. 18 lbs (Regular). (Overtime) New New New New New Was 17.00 25.50 20.00 8.00 EXHIBIT "BN (Developer's Escrow Agreement) Preliminary Plat Application Escrow (1) Conditional Use Permit Escrow Rezoning Escrow New Waiver of Platting Escrow New $150 per acre $1,500 Minimum $4,800 Maximum Final Plat Application Escrow (1) $4,000 Contract Management. Escrow (1) Estimated Construction Costs (2) 0 $150'.,,000 $150,001 - $500.,000 $50,0,001 + New Was $750 Was 2,400 Was $500 Escrow Were 8% ($1,000 Minimum) 4'% 500 6% ($12,000 Minimum) 3$ 6,000 5% ($30,000 Minimum) 2.5% 15,000 (')These are escrow deposits with minimums/maximums, they are not intended to be actual charges. (2)Costs will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary to be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring armslength transaction costs. 19 l Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting SOLID WASTE ORDINANCES C. Amendments, Solid Waste Ordinances --The Solid Waste Abatement Commission has given consideration to several policies relative to the City's recycling program that require amendments to the existing Solid Waste Ordinance. There are specifically two categories the amendments address and they include: 1) house cleaning clarifying amendments and 2) the residential recycling program to include multiply residential 'dwellings consistent with the Dakota County requirements for 1990. It is the intention of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission in their recommendation to the City Council for approval of these amendments that the new legislation be in effect by January 1, 1990, so haulers are properly noticed and the new language is enforced at the time the license renewals take place. For additional infor tion and a copy of the ordinance amendments, please refer to pages /��2�/ through —. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the proposed amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance with or without modification. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR ROSENSTEIN DATE: NOVEMBER 2:7p 1989 SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE Attached you will find proposed amendments of proposed City Code, Chapter 6.37 regarding hauler licenses and 10.01 regarding storage of refuse. These show standard legislative amendment notation which strike out deletions and underline additions to the existing text. These changes have been reviewed at the City Attorney's office and have been approved as to form. With respect to content the thrust of the amendments is to do the following things: 1. Housecleaning and clarifying amendments - these include a. Section 6.37, subd. 1B - modification of language to permit enforcement by City personnel for trash piles including building materials and wood wastes. b. Section 6.37, subd. 1D - addition of metal food cans, effective.February 1, 1990, consistent with Dakota County requirements. C. Section 6.37, subd. 2A - broadened the description to include dumpster-s and garbage carts designated for recyclables. d. Section 10.01, subd. 1B - modification of other refuse definition as above. e. Section 10.01, subd. lI - adds a definition for curb side as being from the back of the curb to eight feet behind the curb on or near the residential driveway. This makes it illegal for residents to store their garbage in the street while leaving latitude for the containers to be placed away from the curb during winter months when snow storage and plowing are issues. The second category of amendments expands the residential recycling program to include multiple residential dwellings, consistent with Dakota County requirements for 1990. They are as follows: a. Section 6.37, subd. 4A3 and 4A5 - these sections extend the requirement for haulers to provide recycling service to multi -family residential dwellings no later than October 1, 1990. Approximately 700 of the 4800 apartment units in the City already have such service and Kris will be working with the rest of the complexes in 1990 to bring them all into compliance by October 1. ✓W� SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS NOVEMBER 21, 1989 PAGE TWO b. Section 10.01, subd. 6A - this section makes it illegal for associations or management companies have hauling contracts which do not provide for recycling. C. Section 10.01, subd. 2D - this amendment more strictly defines the times at which garbage and recycling containers can be placed at the curb. Some complaints have been received by staff concerning residents leaving garbage cans and recycling containers at the curb for several days after their collection. This amendment would permit staff to enforce removal of the containers from the curb side if necessary. The action requested of the Council is to approve these modifications prior to January 1 such that they will be enforced at the time that license renewals take place for 1990. In addition to these amendments, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission is working on one additional amendment which would provide for exemption to the multi -family recycling requirement for mixed municipal solid waste designated to an intermediate processing facility such as the Reuter Plant. The reasons for such an exemptions will be more fully explained if that amendment is brought forward by the Commission. It is mentioned here by way of information that additional work is in progress. If you have any questions concerning this item, please let me know. As 'stant to the City Administrator Enclosures JDH/jeh l 3)l ORDINANCE NO. 2ND,BERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND LICENSING" BY AMENDING SECTION 6.37 REGARDING GARBAGE, REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULERS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 6.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Chapter 6 of the Eagan City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SEC 6.37,. GARBAGE-, REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULERS Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes, including animal offal and carcasses of dead animals but excluding human excreta, sewage and other water carried wastes. B. "Other Refuse" means ashes, non -recyclable glass, crockery, cans, paper„ boxes, rags and similar nonputrescible wastes but exeled}ng sand, earth, brie#,—stone, eenerete, trees, tree=branehes and weed including sand, earth. firewood. C. "Recyclables" means materials which may be recycled or reused through recycling processes including targeted recyclables. D. "Targeted Recyclables" means metal beverage containers, glass, newsprint, metal food cans.* or other materials as may be defined by Council resolution. * Effective February 1. 1990. E. "Yard Waste" means leaves and grass clippings or other materials as may be defined by Council resolution. F. "Residential Dwelling" - Any single building consisting of one through four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. G. "Multiple Residential Dwelling" - Any building used for residential purposes consisting of more than four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. H. "Commercial Establishment" - Any premises where a commercial or industrial enterprise of any kind is carried on, and shall include restaurants, clubs,, churches, and schools where food is prepared or served. 3g I. "Special Pick -Up" means any collection of materials other than garbage, other refuse, recyclables or yard waste including white goods, furniture, oversized materials and construction debris. J. "Daily Hauling District" means a residential area in which garbage, other refuse, recyclables and yard waste are collected on the same day, the boundaries and day of collection of which are defined by Council action. Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any person to haul garbage, other refuse or recyclables for hire without a license therefore from the City, or to haul garbage, other refuse or recyclables from his own residence or business property other than as herein excepted. A. It is'unlawful for any person or business to scavenge or otherwise collect garbage, other refuse, recyclables or yard waste at the curb or from reeyelable eentainers containers designated for recyclable materials without a license therefore from the City and an account relationship with the owner of the premises. Subd. 3. Exception. Nothing in this Section shall prevent persons from hauling garbage, other refuse or recyclables from their own residences or business properties provided the following rules are observed: 1) that all garbage is hauled in containers that are water -tight on all sides and the bottom and with tight -fitting covers on top, 2) that all other refuse and recyclables are hauling in vehicles with leak -proof bodies and completely covered or enclosed by canvas or other means or material so as to completely eliminate the possibility of loss of cargo, 3) that all garbage and other refuse shall be dumped or unloaded only at the designated sanitary land -fill or County designated facility, 4) that recyclables may be disposed of at a recycling facility, an organized recyclable drive or through a licensed recyclable hauler, and 5) that yard waste may be composted privately or be disposed of at a composting facility or through a licensed refuse hauler or recyclable hauler. Subd. 4. Hauler License Requirements. A. Hauler licenses shall be granted only upon the condition that the licensee have water -tight packer -type vehicles or, int he case of recycling haulers, appropriate container vehicles in good condition to prevent loss in transit of liquid or solid cargo, that the vehicle be kept clean and as free from offensive odors as possible and not allowed to stand in any street longer than reasonably necessary to collect garbage, other refuse, yard waste or recyclables. 1. There shall be three license categories defined by the type of account served: 1) Commercial/Multiple Dwelling, 2) Residential Dwelling and 3) 2. Commercial/Multiple Dwelling and„Residential Dwelling hauling licenses include Residential Recycling licenses. a. Residential Recycling licensees may only collect recyclables as defined herein. 3. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall make curbside recycling collection available to all, Residential Dwelling accounts. Commercial/Multiple Dwelling hauling licensees At a minimum, such service shall include all targeted recyclables as defined herein. 4. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall make weekly collection of separated garbage and other refuse, yard waste and recyclables for all Residential Dwelling Accounts within the daily hauling districts as defined by Council action. a. It shall be unlawful for refuse vehicles to operate on residential streets in such districts on any other day, except to collect a missed pick-up, special pick-up or when an observed holiday falls within that week. 5. At a minimum. commercial/multiple dwelling hauling licensees shall make weekly collections of separated garbage, other refuse and recyclables for all multiple residential dwelling accounts no later than October 1. 1990. B. Before a garbage and refuse hauler or recycling license shall be issued, the applicant shall file with the City Clerk -Treasurer evidence that he has provided public liability insurance on all vehicles in at least the sum of $100,000.00 for injury of one person, $300,000.00 for the injury of two or more persons in the same accident, and $50,000.00 for property damages. C. The Council, in the interest of maintaining healthful and sanitary conditions in the City, hereby reserves the right to specify and assign certain areas to all licensees, and to limit the number of licenses issued. D. Each applicant shall file with the City Clerk - Treasurer, before a garbage and refuse hauler or ,recycling license is issued' or renewed, a schedule of proposed rates to be charged by him during the licensed period for which the application is made. Every licensee shall provide prior notification of any change in rates to be implemented during the licensed period. 1. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees rates shall include a minimum of two levels of regular service, priced on the basis of volume. E. No hauler operating on a route in a residential district shall operate a truck on any City street when the weight `gyp of said vehicle exceeds eight tons per axle. F. No hauler shall operate in a residential district after 8:30 o'clock P.M. or before 6:30 o'clock A.M. of any day, and no hauler shall operate in a residential district on Sunday. G. Each vehicle for which a hauler's license is issued shall exhibit•such license in a prominent position on said vehicle,: H. All Residential Dwelling, Commercial/Multiple Dwelling, and Recycling Hauling licensees shall report to the City, on the form .provided for such •purpose, the quantity of all recyclables and yard waste abated' from the landfills. Such quantities shall be reported by tonnage, with the exception that yard waste may be reported in estimates of cubic yardage abated. Failure to certify accurate volumes in a timely manner may be cause for revocation of hauling license. Section Z. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the. Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation"' and Section 6.999, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanorl"are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST;: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: Its: Clerk Date Ordinance Adopted: By: Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 10 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY AMENDING SECTION 10.01 REGARDING STORAGE, DEPOSIT AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 10.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Chapter 10 of the Eagan City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 10.01. STORAGE, DEPOSIT AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes, including animal offal and carcasses of dead animals but excluding human excreta, sewage and other water -carried wastes. B. "Other Refuse" means ashes, non -recyclable glass, crockery, cans, paper, boxes, rags and similar nonputrescible wastes but exeludine sand. earth, briek, stene, eenerete, trees, C. "Recyclables" means materials which may be recycled or reused through recycling processes. D. "Yard Waste" - Leaves and grass clippings or other materials as may be defined by Council resolution. E. "Residential Dwelling" - Any single building consisting of one through four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. F. "Multiple Dwelling" - Any building used for residential purposes consisting of more than four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. G. "Commercial Establishment" - Any premises where a commercial or industrial enterprise of any kind is carried on, and shall include restaurants, clubs, churches, and schools where food is prepared or served. H. "Association" - All cooperative organizatiops of residential dwelling owners formed for the purpose of joint management of property or services. 4 L Subd. 2. Storage.., A. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or other refuse on residential dwelling premises for more than one week. All such storage shall be in water -tight, metal or plastic containers of not less than five gallons with tight fitting covers, which shall be maintained in a. clean and sanitary condition; provided, that yard wastes may be stored in biodegradable plastic bags and tree limbs must be stored in bundles weighing no more than sixty pounds and no longer than four feet. B. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or other refuse on multiple dwelling premises for more than one week. Such storage shall be in containers as for residential dwelling premises, except that so-called "dumpsters" with close - fitting covers may be substituted. C. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or other refuse on commercial establishment premises for more than forty-eight hours. Such storage shall be in containers as for residential dwelling premises, except that so-called "dumpsters" with close -fitting covers may be substituted. or garage. Subd. 3. Deposit. It is unlawful for any person to deposit garbage or other refuse from any source, in any place other than a sanitary landfill or County designated facility. Subd. 4. Fire Danger. It is unlawful for any person'to store, deposit or dispose of any garbage or other refuse which is in flames or heated to the point where it could cause danger of fire in other refuse. Subd. 5. Disposal. The Council may, by resolution, adopt, and from time to time amend, adjust and revise such rules, regulations, rates and charges as it deems necessary or proper for the operation and management of the sanitary landfill. It may give notice of any such action as it deems necessary. Subd. 6,. Joint Management Hauling Contracts. Occupants of residential dwelling properties managed by associations or L(3 others shall have the same opportunity to recycle afforded to occupants of other residential dwelling units. It is unlawful for any Residential Dwelling association or other Residential Dwelling joint management entity to negotiate, execute or maintain a contract for residential garbage or other refuse collection unless it includes as a part of that contract, or as part of a separate contract, weekly collection of recyclables occurring on the same day as its refuse collection. weekly collection of recvclables. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" and Section 10.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: By: Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting VARIANCE/SIDEYARD SETBACK FOR TIMANDCONNIE WHITE D. Variance, Tim and Connie White, of 4 -Foot to Side Yard Setback to Accommodate Expansion of Existing Single-Fandly Home -Tim and Connie White who reside at 4480 Oak Chase Way, Lot 5, Block 2, Oak -Chase 3rd Addition are requesting a variance to the side yard setback to accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of the existing single family home. For additional information on this item, refer to report pre��p%� d by the Community Development Department referenced as pages through / 7d . This type of variance does not require any action by the Planning Commission and is, therefore, published in the legal newspaper and notices are sent to the surrounding neighbors providing notification that the City Council will consider the variance application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance request by Tim and Connie White for a side yard setback to accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of their existing single-family home at Lot 5, Block 2, Oak Chase 3rd Addition. `L- ' SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: TIM 6 CONNIE WHITE LOCATION: 4480 OAR CHASEWAY (LOT 5, BLOCK 2, OAR CHASE 3RD ADDITION) EXISTING ZONING: E (ESTATE RESIDENTIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 5, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 28, 1989 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: The applicants are requesting a Variance to the side yard setback to ,accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of the existing single family home. COMMENTS: The applicant's home was built in 1976. On May 3, 1977 the City Council approved a rezoning of the west one-half of the SE 1/4 of Section 27 from R-1 (Single Family) to E (Estate Residential). This rezoning included the property presently owned by the applicants. When the house was built in 1976, it met all setback requirements of the R-1 zoning in place at that time. However, when the zoning was changed to Estate in 1977, the home became a legally existing non -conforming structure because the increased setback requirements of the Estate zoning district are not met by the existing structure,. The required side yard setback in the Estate district is 301. The existing setback meets the R-1 requirement of 101. The applicant is requesting a 4' Variance which would leave a 6' setback between the house and the west property line. Because of mature tree growth and the slope in back of the house, the applicant has selected the side of the house for the addition due to possible root, and erosion damage that may result from an addition off the rear of the structure. _ _ Y•0. 0 �r41LD€FNE59 _ •;• ••� •:— $ ooUN �.�-1.1, ••rnT. • T ROAD 1n._ 1 .- - P' 199003 . 27240 - 6'r .r.. OAK 22714 -- 4 0 - R . _ "CHAS --- - 'il l^ '.\ .n•v'rrr C list.- Ar.. ��•.Z •'4r; 0 If tryst" ,.1 MP.. �`� ,rr'r ••.� OND ��.��] 3 R al •4 3I .. `list •...,a...•• y� ;!,\ - i'y?�Eow •'" ••r.. ,'y �. . mma POND" _ _ �. C• i "/a6 1. t�;j h.,v=list `�. ,R,`'• 4 ° _ 3 tie di�r�1• ;:;{:;: - A! t •y • ::.�`. r N'. .h • ::: s 4 •. {.I�1Pt"E� •list.I,1°°012—o2..r �` �; P■ --LANE b " /4, i"'• 3 t akLr 6 g U) ur 1 # s a 011-02 w - 1 x .___Rl42,—._ . rl. % . ■ s i $ •. � : nem r . •r-• + v i -:•.1.1.rP bw 1 nem i -_ il• A i` Q$ • e R Y w 4 4. , i ...p �.' 1. ' 'iSiYS�E Y 9 4 �• .,•m Iw gIle E .list i — Tii A•y/ �: -p,tr v°in ylp OAK •/,.f y...�y .mm K 3 r.. I ell It. ' � s:x ,vE2 ',.list• '__---_. M1 a I -A ®R e I! ir-IM04h; F .Woe sti. I ij 4v I -A ®R e I! ir-IM04h; F .Woe sti. I ij Agenda Information Memo December 5; 1989 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT E%TENSIONIEPISCOPAL CHURCH E. Extension of Preliminary Plat for Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church --Enclosed on pages J'�Z through Yis a memo and attachments from the Community Development Department. The request for extension of this preliminary plat is for one year and reasons for the extension are outlined in a letter in as part of the attachments. At the November 21 City Council meeting this item was continued to allow the staff to review the conditions that were originally placed on the preliminary plat and determine if any changes ,are appropriate. A one year extension would be appropriate and the specific date of November 30; 1990 is suggested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an extension on the preliminary plat for Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church with or without modification to the conditions until November 30, 1990 to allow the church to complete its capital fund raising drive and proceed with building plans during calendar year 1990. ILO MEMO'TO: TOM HEDGES,, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1989 SUBJECT: SAINTS MARTHA AND MARY EPISCOPAL CHURCH ADDITION The City has received a request for an extension of the Saints Martha and Mary Episcopal Church Addition located at the northeast intersection of Diffley Road and• Lexington Avenue. Preliminary plat was granted on December 20, 1988. All City departments have been aware of this request and it was discussed at the in-house development staff meeting. There were no new concerns raised. The letter does not request a specific length for the extension but it appears as though the applicant would like the church to be under construction next year. Therefore, a"one-year extension makes the most sense. Attached is the applicant"'Ps letter and the Council minutes from December 20,, 1988.. ity Planner Attachments JS/mg jj � Ss. Martha & Mary Episcopal Church 1021 Diffley Rd. Eagan, MN 55123 Nov. 14, 1089 Mayor Vic Ellisonand Members of the City Council The City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan MN 55122 Dear Mayor Ellison. and Members of the City Council, We am writing'to ask that our church be given an extension on its preliminary plat approval. This approval was first given to us by the City Council at its meeting on Dec. 20, 1988. The preliminary plat is for the Southwest comer of section 23 of Lexington and Diffley roads. We originally thought that we would be able to conduct our capital fund raising program in 1989 and proceed with the next stage of building plans during the Fall of 1989. The development of our fundraising campaign has taken longer than we thought it would take. We are now ready, however, to proceed •with•our fundraising in early 1990.Once we are into this campaign we will know how much we:can spend on our building and what kinds of loans we will need to arrange. Our church building committee is getting back into action,and we are hoping to come to City Hall with the necessary proposals, plans and specifications by the late Spring of 1990. We hope we are able to start construction in mid -summer or early Fall. Thank you for giving consideration to this extension. We willnaturally be happy to answer any questions you might have at this point. Yours truly, The Rev. George H Martin Vicar ,a7'/ AlAe�-' Douglas Wobbema Senior Warden Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 20, 1988 EPISCOPAL CHURCH ADDITION Community Development Director Dale Runkle introduced the site plan to the Council. Pastor Martin informed the Council he was available for questions. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from D -III to Public Facilities for the Episcopal Church Addition. All voted in favor. Egan movedy Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve a rezoning from R-4 to Public Facilities for the Episcopal Church Addition. All voted in favor. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve a preliminary plat entitled Episcopal Church Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 19871 shall be complied with: A-1, B-11 B-2, B-31 C-1, C-2, C-4, D-1, E-1, F-1 and G-1. 2. The parking stalls shall be ten feet wide. 3. The detailed landscaping plan will place emphasis on screening the parking areas from the public streets and the apartments to the north. 4. The City shall inspect the single family home to insure all building codes are being satisfied. 5. 'The access onto Lexington Avenue will be finalized with all concerned parties. The proposed access entrance to be constructed to a width of 30 feet. 6. All signage shall conform to Code requirements. 7. The proposed development is subject to additional requirements pertaining to grading, drainage and fire 'hydrant coverage with the final plat phase of development. 8. The finished floor elevation for the worship center shall be at least 984 feet. All voted in favor. I- Councilmember McCrea noted that quality control should be considered. R-88.94 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSEICHEERS WINE AND SPIRITS F. License, Off -Sale Liquor for Cheers Rine and Spirits/Scott Liquor Company—Mr. Daniel Herbst, representing Scott Liquor Company and Cheers Wine and Spirits, has applied for an off -sale liquor license at 1995 Rahncliff Court. If the off -sale liquor license is approved, Mr. Herbst plans to open the liquor store at Rahncliff Crossings approximately March 1, 1990. Current City Code language allows one license per 2;000 households. Eagan has exceeded 18,000 households which allows for the issuance of nine (9) off -sale liquor licenses. The City currently has six active licenses and two pending applications. The pending applications include Cheers Wine and Spirits and an application by Richard Barone. For additional information on the location of the ac ive licenses and pending applications, refer to the attached map enclosed on page. Also enclosed on page is a map showing the proposed location of Cheers Wine and Spirits. The Police have completed the investigation and find no reason to deny the application as requested by Mr. Herbst. For additional information on the -off -sale license application, refer to a copy of the application that is provided without page number:. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor license application for Cheers Wine and Spirits to be located at the Rahncliff Crossings. (53 12/5/89 OFF- SALE LIQUOR LICENSES OW 23- =7 Y T 0 ACTIVE LICENSES: PENDING APPLICATIONS: I- Big Top Wines & Spirits (Applebaum) 7- Cheers Wine & Spirits 2- Kenny's 8- Richard Barone 3- Great Northern Spirits 4- Big Top Wines & Spirits (Sidco) 5- MGM Warehouse 6- Liquor Shoppe,Inc. DEVELOPMENT PLAN POSED LOCATION ❑ PHASE I F ERS WINE &! SPIRITS "It PHASE Il jet PHASE III Developed By: WUN RECH COMP011ES NAM ROAD ct CROSSINGSk ( UT ep cp Developed By: WUN RECH COMP011ES NAM ROAD ct CROSSINGSk Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/XAVIER'S RESTAURANT FOR ON -SALE LIQUOR G. Conditional Use Permit for Xavier's Restaurant to Allow On -Sale Liquor in a CSC District—A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on November 28 to consider an application submitted by Xavier's Restaurant for a conditional use permit for on -sale liquor. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. For additional information on this item, refer to a staff reporlZ prepared by Community Development which is enclosed on pages 2 through The APC minutes on this item will be distributed with the Additional Information Packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor at Xavier's Restaurant. /s(�M SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR XAVIER'S RESTAURANT APPLICANT: CARMEN CONESSA LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 1, TOWN CENTER 100 6TH EXISTING ZONING: CBC, PD (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 28# 1989 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 30, 1989 REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit for on -sale liquor at Xavier's Restaurant located at 1260 Town Centre Drive in the Town Centre Shoppes. The restaurant was granted a conditional use permit in June 1969 to allow for on -sale beer and wine. The restaurant seats approximately one hundred people and is classified by code as a sit-down or Class 1 restaurant. COMMENTS: If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1. All applicable ordinances. 2. Any necessary permits are approved by the City Police 'Department. I FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - LOT 3, BLOCK It TOWN CENTRE 100 6TH: Based on the study of financial obligations collected in the past and the proposedl uses for the property, no financial obligation is proposed for consideration. ls1 A 7 O TOWN CENTER SHOPPES To" (jnIm Im" I , I�IIIIr.1111 III:I�i�i�i. I: :J. W .' II `\ II !I I I II i IIII�I ! 111'111� li ! III!,. \ 7. ' I I: "o I I I y:�•y V S 1 1 1 i SITE PIAN PROJECT DATA Shv. 347,70S &1. 17.911 acres) Building Ama: �— Handkiln PalkifflM 7 Stalls D_ — 7tioyd.e3 D .< D SITE PIAN PROJECT DATA Shv. 347,70S &1. 17.911 acres) Building Ama: 69,900 Lt. Handkiln PalkifflM 7 Stalls Total Parkins Provided: 393 Stalls 0 w a® O Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/A & R PALLET CRATING H. Conditional Use Permit,, A & R Pallet Crating to Allow Outside Storage in an LI District—A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on November 28, to consider an application presented by Arthur Mulvihill for a conditional use permit to allow outside storage at the A & R Pallet Crating operation. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to a copy of the staff report enclosed on LLQ through '-t41. The APC minutes on this item will be distributed with the Additional Information Packet on. Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON' THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit as requested by A & R Pallet Crating to allow outside storage in an IrI district. l �I SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A&R PALLET -CRATING APPLICANT: ARTHUR T. MULVIHILL LOCATION: 4841 BISCAYNE AVENUE LOTS 4& 5 p BLOCK 1 r HALLEY I S IST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 281 1989 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 31r 1989 REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application for a conditional use permit has been submitted to allow outside storage at the, A&R Pallet -Crating (formerly Bloomington Cartage) operation located at the northwest end of Biscayne Avenue. Mr. Mulvihill had been granted a conditional use permit for this location in July of 1979. This permit allowed a truck terminal on Lot 4 of Block 1. The terminal was needed for the Bloomington Cartage business that is no longer operating at this site. The current operation at this site is the manufacturing of wooden pallets. COMMENTS: The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit to allow for outside storage of wooden pallets as well as storage of several trailers that will hold and protect pallets from the elements. Outdoor storage is allowed by conditional use in the I-1 Limited Industrial District. The applicant's property is surrounded by property zoned limited industrial on the south, east, and west. The north property line abuts land zoned agricultural. The City Code requires screening along any property line of industrial property that abuts agricultural or residential land. The code states screening shall consist of a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than six (6) feet in height. However, due to the lay of the land, the property to the north is completely screened from this site. if approved., this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All outside storage areas and non -paved areas shall be sodded or,seeded to control dust and run-off. Outside storage of pallets and materials shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 1C) FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - LOTS 4 AND 5o 31ALLEY118 IST ADDITION: Based..on the study of.financial obligations collected in the past and the proposed uses for the property, no financial obligation is proposed for consideration. �� y S, E, 1/4 S EC 0 369 T 27 , R � n�,i^, ',. •.\� -� � __�ii ROAM •1t 2 � 'cinoi •''.� � es' kv 015 -Te !!-moo ,—. At t -a p.— 011-01 012-81 l�2- 017 TR TART 0r 021 T5 Om 96L -&T T�aiL.MR,6 t l.C3 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PD AMENDMENT/RAHNCLIFF CROSSINGS I. Planned Development Amendment for Rahncliff Crossings, Inc., to Revise the Overall Pylon Sign Exhibit in the Rahncliff`Crossings Planned Development --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting.held on November 28 to review the overall pylon sign plan. in the Rahncliff Crossings planned development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to p copy of a staff report prepared by Community Development enclosed on pagesthrough L(ka. The APC minutes on this item will be distributed with the Additional "Information Packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a planned development amendment for Rahncliff Crossings, Inc, to revise theoverall pylon sign exhibit. llA CITY OF EAGAN 8UWZCT,: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZMNDXZM (RABNCLIFF CROSSINGS PD) APPLICANT: RAMCLIFF CROSSINGS' INC LOCATION: BW 1/4 OF SECTION 32 EXISTING SONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC BEARING: NOVEMBER 28s 1989 DATE OF REPORT,: NOVEMBER 151 1989 COMPILED BY: COXXUNITY DEVELOPXENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment to revise the overall pylon sign plan in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development. A development identification pylon sign was approved where the Burger Ring sign is currently standing, and the Burger Ring pylon was approved directly to the south approximately 200 feet- During the construction process, the Burger Ring sign was erected where the identification Pylon should have been, thus requiring the amendment to the PD. The applicant would ,like to move the Burger Ring sign to the east approximately 120 feet and eliminate the project identification pylon. The distance from the proposed site to the existing pylon for the auto service center to the west would be approximately 190 feet. Code requires a 300 -foot spacing. If approved, a revised planned development exhibit shall be attached to the Planned Development Agreement. 1 (os' C7)9 Jit �� ----..---- ---. -f.--- Cliff Road J r.n.nn�n.n,.nrr, rrrrnr ^•T•'"' �"-'-' Itlllll 11 I i i I I�i i l l o f 1 Irrriirrrl � - i i . ..•---�.� tee» 111111 ull. a ll1l tll i T OIIIIIE�I IqTM IIIIII0 Ra. W7 01)III�III�� 0111111�I III#I10 �,�� e�} IJ G • T gy y � ; O x 61111E•. : f. 2a uonvanlii REIIMINARY.'M', 41,04 IICIIFF PI ,.20. n )aures R.I-IiIII inc:. U) x m m rn 1: < v r z0 z Itlllll 11 I i i I I�i i l l o f 1 Irrriirrrl � - i i . 'e i� li 1 jj::i I " I U) x m m rn 1: < v r z0 z .J.' iA 9 ACCESS ROAD MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1989 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE STATUS REPORT/ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR DAKOTA COUNTY Enclosed on pages/Z through –4-2L is a copy of the November Status Report for all assisted housing programs and community development programs currently being operated in the City of Eagan and a summary sheet for Dakota County. LETTER TO THE EDITOR(RESPONSE TO WINTER MAINTENANCE OF PARK TRAIL SYSTEM Enclosed on page -0-2--- is a letter that was prepared and sent to This Week and the Eagan Chronicle regarding the City's reasons why the park trail system and adjoining bike paths do not receive winter maintenance. There is also a condensed version of this letter included in the December edition of the city-wide newsletter. YMCA The YMCA Advisory Committee is continuing to meet on a monthly basis and is planning a fundraiser in early 1990 with community programming to follow. METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL MEETING The Eagan/Mendota Heights departure corridor alternative has been under review for several months by the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council. Several weeks ago, Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein requested that Eagan be advised as to when the proposed departure corridor alternative is to be heard by MASAC so members of the City Council, staff, media and other community representatives could be present for the discussion and presentation. Unfortunately, the Metropolitan Airports Commission staff scheduled the next Metropolitan Aircraft South Abatement Council meeting for December 5 and appearing on the agenda is the City of Mendota Heights proposed Eagan/Mendota Heights departure corridor alternative. The City Administrator has requested a continuance of this item to the January 23 meeting allowing Eagan to be properly represented. Generally, a summary of the MASAC agenda or minutes is lig provided as a part of the Informative Memo. Due to the importance of this issue, a copy of the entire agenda packet 's enclosed on pages through �=>/ for your review. Also enclosed on page is a copy of a letter that was sent to MASAC Chairperson Walter Rockenstein requesting the continuance. An update regarding the request for continuance will be forthcoming with the Administrative Packet on Monday. EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL Our City employees raised in excess of $550 for the Community Action Council to ass' t with meals that were provided for Thanksgiving. Enclosed on pages and ZB6 is a memo that was sent to all employees regarding our donation and also a request from the employees' Sunshine Committee that we provide a donation to the Armful of Love at Christmas. CARTOON The Informative Memo ends with a cartoon enclosed on page /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Status Report for Dakota County** November, 1989 Amount * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing: Certificates 399 1082 1,481 -53 Vouchers 101 211 312 -12 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 205 585 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,131 2,386 3,517 -65 Amount Commercial/ of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase MHFA Local Participation 0 10 0 10 2 MHFA Home Improvement Loan 35 187 0 222 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 70 79 0 149 2 MHFA Home Energy Loan 11 148 0 159 2 Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0' CDBG Rehab Loan 94 199 0 293 16 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/P. N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 386 1,606 0 1,992 19 TOTAL CUMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 639 2,321 8 2,968 24 * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. Status Report for the City of Eagan November, 1989 ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Existing: Certificates Vouchers Section 8 New Construction Low Rent Housing 236 Rental TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING Amount of Elderly Family Total (+/-)* 31 197 228 -27 20 50 70 -6 0 33 33 0 0 22 22 0 0 144 144 0 51 446 497 -33 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 CDSG Rehab Loan 1 Weatherization 6 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 13 * + = Increase/- = Decrease \-q \ Amount of Family Total Increase 14 16 0 3 6 0 12 13 0 8 9 1 70 76 2 107 120 3 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINI JES01A 551221897 PHONE: (6121454 8100 FAX: (61:1) 4548363 To the Editor: MC ELLISON M,v THOMAS EGAN DAVID x, GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCRFA THEODORE WACH"ER Coemli Meme" THOMAS HEDGE CN Atlmir,111,0.1 EUGENE VAN OVER9EKE Ciry eiepk Residents of Eagan are justifiably proud of their park trail system and adjoining bike paths. Many of the health -conscious joggers and walkers who use the system like to remain active during the winter months. As a result, some residents have expressed concern over the City's policy of not removing snow from the trail system. Originally installed for "three season" use, the trails were not intended to receive winter maintenance for several reasons. First, such maintenance would cost an additional $102,000 for special equipment and upwards of $45,000 per season in operating costs to plow 60 miles of trails. Maintaining the system to a level of service that would probably be demanded by users would be extremely difficult given the unpredictability of snowfalls. Secondly, ground obstructions adjacent to the trails make snow removal very difficult. Junction boxes for cable television and telephone, backyard fences and landscape rocks can make snowplowing very hazardous. In addition, the plows would likely impact sod, small trees, and other vegetation next to the trails since they do not have proper curbing which is required for effective snow removal. Much of the salt and sand required during the winter would generate additional lawn maintenance preblems: for adjacent property owners in the spring. The third major reason the trails do not recei•.e winter maintenance is liability. The City would likely be responsible for injury resulting from accidents on trails if a maintenance program were in effect. The likelihood of such accidents is very high considering the probability of joggers slipping on ice patches. According to the City insurance provider, the City is not legally responsible for injuries on trails where no maintenance program is in effect for the winter months. Trail users can be assured that the City Co-incil will continue to revisit this issue as part of future budget considerations. I encourage residents to contact City Hall if they have any further questions or concerns about this issue. Sincerely, Thomas 1.. Hedges Eagan City Administrator THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 1--) ID— AGENDA METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING December 5, 1989 7:30 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on October 24, 1989 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 6. IAM Union Address to MASAC by Dan Lockran 7. City of Mendota Heights Proposed Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Alternative 8. Selection and Vote for MASAC Representatives Stage 3 Utilization Working Group. 9. MAC 1990 Construction Plans 10. MSP Noise b Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS): Update on Arts IIIA radar data Access Agreement with FAA 11. Report of MAC Commission Meeting November 20, 1989 12. Other Items Not on the Agenda 13. Adjournment NEXT MEETING DATE: dANDARY 23, 1989 � �3 FA EG R E & B EN S O N i[OO MOMMCST CENTER RO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA ES.02-3001 ""34 .. .... .". aa•-aoa• am•c •Poo •o.E. cA•...Co. •.00 .e•M.weALL l•wc •ouL[v.o Lo+Re. cca. ,[.� [NSJNO •w e.�w o+e+. ��w.0 o+. c•.a+-�e+e anm•�u ur,v�-+toe •cLcc e••[• •aa-na+ •ncw•rt. Pn-u.. November 10, 1989 Steve Vecchi Metropolitan Airports Commission Box 11700 Twin Cities Airport, Minnesota 55111 Dear Steve: IS 00.:t o .[.uwc "^z 'k o[.+[.. cole�.00 •o cea-.00. a oa. ua-a uc •c.aco •�c. L•e•••a Enclosed for MASAC's records is the original of David Braslau's letter to me requesting that the City of Mendota Heights be placed on the agenda for the December 5, 1989, meeting. As we discussed, this presentation should be placed on the agenda and the material mailed to all MASAC members. Please note that Mr. Braslau is requesting the use of an overhead projector at the meeting. If you cannot provide one, please call Mr. Braslau so that he can arrange to bring one. WHR/cjv 5673w cc: David Braslau Sincerely yours, / Walter H. Rockenstein II P, devid breslau associates. incorporsted 1 31 3 Stn street s,e. • su-te322 • m,nneaool-s. mn 55414 • te,ec none S' 2 331.-157 31 October 1989 Walter Rockenstein, Chairman Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council c/o Faegre b Benson 2500 Norwest Center 90 South 7th St. Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901 RE: Request for Placement on MASAC Agenda Dear Mr. Rockenstein: The City of Mendota Heights has asked that our firm make a presentation to MASAC on a revised proposal for the Eagan/Mendota Heights. Corridor at the ear- liest possible convenience. Formal approval of our agreement to represent the City in this effort will be considered at the November 7, 1989 Council Meeting. I will confirm this with you or let you know immediately if there are anv changes in the current plan. in the meantime., I would like to request that we be placed on the Agenda of the ..ASAC meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December '5, 1989 or the January 1990 meeting, if you feel that would be more appropriate. The presentation would constitute a formal submittal to MASAC of the City of Mendoca Heights proposed °wenn/"erdota Heights Corridor System adopted by the City Council at their meeting of October 3, 1989. The presentation would be made by myself and Robert Collette, Air Traffic Con- sultant, and would involve use of an overhead projector which we could provide if necessarv. The presencarion would provide a quick background of the proposal and the reasons for each of its elements. I assume that some repre- sentarives of the City of Mendota Heights other than the M,1SAC representative may wish to attend the meeting. We will also request at that time that Robert Col' -este be appointed as an interim member of the MASAC Operations Committee should MASAC accept the proposal for review. Attached is a copy of the resolution as adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council. It may be more appropriate to use a signed version if this is to be included in a mailing to MASAC representatives. Please let me know if you have any questions and we look forward to the opportunity to appear before MASAC. Sincerely, David Braslau ?resident cc: James Danielson, City of Mendota Heights Robert Collette AGENDA METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOS ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETTT7G December 5, 1989 7:30 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on October 24, 1989 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 6. IAM Union Address to MASAC by Dan Lockran 7. City of Mendota Heights Proposed Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Alternative 8. Selection and Voce for MASAC Representatives Stage 3 Utilization Working Group, 9. MAC 1990 Construction Plans 10. HSP Noise b Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS):' Update on Arts IIIA radar data Access Agreement with FAA 11. Report of MAC Commission Meeting November 20, 1989 12. Other Items Not on the Agenda 13. Adjournment NEXT MEETING DATE: JANUARY 23, 1989 1 -�3 FAEGRE & BENSON 2200 NORwCST CENTER SO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 25.02'3901 •a/))R')000 [w.[ n50, •.o0 D.C.T11 c•[.e.c.• e.00 .o..Awe•1c .•Ac cou, c.••. 11.11. co. ,c+...... Ho u oe.�.e.o.. .•w a o+. es.aT-�e+e an cxaw] I'm C 'L CLco.�c• •n -u.. November 10, 1989 Steve Vecchi Metropolitan Airports Commission Boa 11700 Twin Cities Airport, Minnesota 55111 Xww Dear Steve: Leeo •c•uRuc •.•L. ]T0 [[v[... ... ...[[+ .1—C. Colo -:Do .0 ...... xo]/ux-eeec •c.c co •�u uL[ua Enclosed for MASAC's records is the original of David Braslau's letter to me requesting that the City of Mendota Heights be placed on the agenda for the December 5, 1989, meeting. As we discussed, this presentation should be placed on the agenda and the material mailed to all MASAC members.. Please note that Mr. Braslau is requesting the use of an overhead projector at the meeting. If you cannot provide one, please call Mr. Braslau so that he can arrange to bring one. WHR/cjv 5673w cc: David Braslau Sincerely yours, Walter H. Rockenstein II dawid bread b aaaooiates. jricorporeted i 3 1 3 Scr screec s. e, su,ce 322 min neeo55414 • te,eo,one 6 1 2 331_4571 oi�s. mn 31 October 1989 Walter Rockenstein, Chairman Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council c/o Faegre b Benson 2500 Norwest Center 90 South 7th St. Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901 RE: Request for Placement on MASAC Agenda Dear Mr. Rockenstein: The City of Mendota Heights has asked that our firm make a presentation to MASAC on a revised proposal for the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor at the ear- liest possible convenience. Formal approval of our agreement to represent the City in this effort will be considered at the November 7, 1989 Council Meeting. I will confirm this with you or let you know immediately if there are any changes in the current plan. In the meantime, I would like to request that we be placed on the Agenda of the `IASAC meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 5, 1989 or the January 1990 meeting., if you feel that would be more appropriate. The presentation would constitute a formal submittal to MASAC of the City of Mendota Heights proposed Ea nn'Me dota Hei.ehts Corridor System adopted by the City Council at their ber meeting of Octo3, 1989. The presentation would be made by myself and Robert Collette, Air Traffic Con- sulzant, and would involve use of an overhead projector which we could provide if necessary. The presentation would provide a quick background of the proposal and the reasons for each of its elements. I assume that some repre- sentatives of the City of Mendota Heights other than the M,%SAC representative mov wish to attend the meeting. We will also request at that time that Robert Col' -este be appointed as an interim member of the MASAC Operations Committee should MASAC accept the proposal for review. Attached is a copy of the resolution as adopted by the Mendota Heights Citv Council. It may be more appropriate to use a signed version if this is to be included in a mailing to MASAC representatives. Please let me know if you have any questions and we look forward to the opportunity to appear before MASAC. Sincerely, David Braslau President cc: James Danielson, City of Mendota Heights Robert Collette CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 89-115 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING REVISED PROCEDURES FOR THE EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS IMPLEMENTEDOAND OPROVIDING CAAMORE EQUITABLE DISTNGES SINCE THE COIDOR WAS RST REFLECT RIBUTION OF AIRCRAFT NOISE BETWEEN THE CITIES OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND EAGAN WHEREAS, when the Corridor was established, Runway 11L -29R was a short runway used primarily for propeller aircraft with little or no air carrier jet departures, and, WHEREAS, the term "Corridor" is a misnomer since only a southern boundary has been formally defined while the northern "boundary" has continued to move north over time, and WHEREAS, changes in magnetic declination to thenorth have placed flight tracks further to the north each year, WHEREAS, forecast increases in airport operations will eventually overwhelm the corridor and long-range planning appears to be prudent, and WHEREAS, the noise contour reflecting hourly departures (in terms of L10) has continued to move to the north beyond the Metropolitan Council's policy contour, and WHEREAS., Runway 11L now takes an equal share of departures although there is less demand for turns to the north, and, WHEREAS, peak arrivals and departures are more intense under the airline hubbing concept than in the past, and WHEREAS, this leads to required divergence of aircraft departing the parallel runways and with the southern boundary fixed, this forces aircraft further north, and, WHEREAS, realignment of the primary instrument runway at St• andl increases potential conflicts with MSP eastbound departures, WHEREAS, the PRS (Preferential Runway System) as revised by the new Runway Use System places greater emphasis on use of the Corridor for departures which leads to an increase in divergent tracks within the corridor and hence over Mendota Heights; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, that the following changes in aircraft operations within the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor be submitted to the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council for evaluation and implementation: PROPOSED EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR SYSTEM 1. A 11150 Corridor" shall be defined on the north as a magnetic bearing of 105° from the southeast end of Runway 11L/29R and on the south as a magnetic bearing of 120° from the southeast end of Runway 11R/29L. The final placement of the 150 Corridor.shall be determined by the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Operations Committee. 2. The 150 Corridor shall be given first priority for departures from Runways 11R and 11L whenever traffic volumes permit. 3. A "Fanned Corridor" shall be defined on the north as a magnetic bearing of 0900 from the southeast end of Runway 11L/29R and on the south as a magnetic bearing of 150° from the southeast end of Runway 11R/29L. 4. Use of the "Fanned Corridor" shall not be permitted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (2200 to 0700 local time). 5. The MSP Tower shall determine when peak departure periods require use of the "Fanned corridor.,, epartus re periods shall not exceed an aggregate maximum of per day between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 6. The boundariesof the 150 Corridor shall be depicted on radar video maps. 7. A Corridor System 180 -day test shall be conducted to answer the following questions: a) Does the. Corridor System lead to a more equitable distribution of noise between Mendota Heights and Eagan? b) Is the Corridor System operationally feasible? Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Third day of October, 1989. ATTEST Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensctto Mayor C CAV of eaga WALTER ROCKENSTEIN, CHAIR METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL 6040 28TH AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 Re: Dear Rocky: In official action taken at its regular meeting of November 9, 1989, the Eagan City Council adopted the attached resolution concerning the Braslau/Collette Corridor Report. In taking this action, the Council is highly critical of the Report for its distortion of fact and unsupported conclusions. We expect that the City of Mendota Heights will bring this matter forward to MASAC and the MAC in the near future, and we feel strongly that it should not receive endorsement. In taking this action, the Council firmly believes the Study's proposal to be inconsistent with regional land use policy and unnecessary based on operational considerations. What is necessary is for MAC, MASAC, FAA and the Metropolitan Council to move forward to a conclusion on operations which will relate rationally to regional land use policy as it pertains to noise abatement. If you have any questions concerning this action or wish to discuss this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact either Jon Hohenstein of our staff of myself. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely yours., Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Enclosure TLH/vmd THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Athrmahve Action Employer 9�� VIC ELLISON 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 5512221897 rHOMAS EGAN PHONE. (612) A54-8100 DAIAD K GUSTAFSON EA%: (612) 45A-8363 PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER =arc. caner. THOMAS HEDGES November 16, 1989 n VEP O EUGENE NF VAN VERBEKf C.n C r. WALTER ROCKENSTEIN, CHAIR METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL 6040 28TH AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 Re: Dear Rocky: In official action taken at its regular meeting of November 9, 1989, the Eagan City Council adopted the attached resolution concerning the Braslau/Collette Corridor Report. In taking this action, the Council is highly critical of the Report for its distortion of fact and unsupported conclusions. We expect that the City of Mendota Heights will bring this matter forward to MASAC and the MAC in the near future, and we feel strongly that it should not receive endorsement. In taking this action, the Council firmly believes the Study's proposal to be inconsistent with regional land use policy and unnecessary based on operational considerations. What is necessary is for MAC, MASAC, FAA and the Metropolitan Council to move forward to a conclusion on operations which will relate rationally to regional land use policy as it pertains to noise abatement. If you have any questions concerning this action or wish to discuss this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact either Jon Hohenstein of our staff of myself. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely yours., Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Enclosure TLH/vmd THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Athrmahve Action Employer 9�� RESOLUTION CONCERNING TEE BRASLAII/COLLETTE CORRIDOR REPORT COMMISSIONED BY TEE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Eagan, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights have as their common boundary an area of land use generally compatible with aircraft overflight known as the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor; and, WHEREAS, the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport has promulgated runway use systems including the Preferential Runway System (PRS) which direct the largest proportion of air traffic to the southeast and toward that corridor; and, WHEREAS, the Cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights have expressed a desire in the past to work cooperatively with one another and with airport -related agencies to develop operational procedures which will relate fairly and equitably to that area of land use; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has promulgated policy guidelines for the planning, development and redevelopment of noise impact areas; and, WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights commissioned a study of the Corridor through Dave Braslau and ,Associates and Robert Collette; and, WHEREAS, the Braslau/Collette Corridor Study proposes a dramatic change in corridor procedures which would introduce broad new areas of the City of Eagan to severe noise impacts for which the noise compatible corridor was developed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan finds the Bras lau/Collette report to be factually flawed and holding out conclusions which are not supported by historical fact, regional policy and operational considerations; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan strongly opposes the Braslau/Collette study and its proposed operational system and directs staff to represent such position in the strongest possible terms to the City of Mendota Heights, the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the Federal Aviation Administration and other interested parties; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan urgently requests that the Metropolitan Council take an active role in the resolution of the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor issue as it directly pertains to the relationship between urban municipalities, the regional transportation system and regional land use policy; and, V' 1� BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights be urged to set aside the Braslau/Collette study; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan invite the City of Mendota Heights to participate in direct discussions of this issue; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City request that MASAC release its corridor report and move forward with its mediation of this issue. CITY OF CITY CO By: —55" Attest: Motion Made By: McCrea I Cle Seconded By: Gustafson Those In Favor: All Those Opposed: None CERTIYICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a re lar a ting thereof assembled this 9th day of November E an er a e, City Clerk Ci y of Eagan r. a NOISE COMPLAINT SUMMARY 1988 Wold-Chanberlain 1897 Run -ups 4 Miscellaneous 11 7MAL 1934 1989 Wold-Chanierlain 1268 Ru -upa 3 Secondaries: 15 Airlake 0 Anoka 0 Crystal 0 Plying Cloud 3 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 10 WrAL 1284 OPERATIONS S[PWRY crosstown 494 MSP RUNWAY USAGE OC70BER 1989 Minnesota River t PC m KEY 9 - Approx. i of Scheduled gx-rations (Carriers and Ccmmnters ) 1988 / 1989 Air Carrier 638 627 conuter (3rd 156 181 level) General Aviation 137 135 Military 15 7 Air Freight 63 51 7u 1009 1001 (Average Daily Operations) crosstown 494 MSP RUNWAY USAGE OC70BER 1989 Minnesota River t PC m KEY 9 - Approx. i of Scheduled gx-rations (Carriers and Ccmmnters ) OCTOBER 1989 mcum OF: EMILY zBfwV ��+ NY�YA+J USE OF ISYS 1y�Q�L SCSE�� AII�tAFT CARRIER ��.p W-+'+J1u� F'iiElCal�' 71 38.78 7,138 5,405 1,683 50 29 51.68 4,783 3,675 1,039 69 22 0.2% 4 4 0 0 04 9.58 757 639 80 38 TUM ARRIVALS 12,682 9,723 2,802 FLYS RUMMY 8 OSE OF ISYS 'row SCEEDCLFD AIItQ7AFT CARRIER CQII71fR 17MCMT 11 68.38 8,232 6,328 1,772 132 29 23.08 3,923 2,973 933 17 22 8.78 537 419 105 13 04 0.08 0 0 0 0 TOM DEPAR7CRES 12,692 9,720 2,810 162 l 8i OCTOBER 1989 NOISE COMPLAINTS by City (Landing and Takeoff) and Time of Day Citv IAnding Takeoff Apple Valley 0 1 Bloomington 0 19 Burnsville 0 4 Cottage Grove 1 1 Eagan 46 266 Eden Prairie 1 0 Edina 2 3 Farmington 1. 0 Inver Grove Heights 3 11 Lakeville 0 1 Mendota Heights 18 259 Minneapolis 217 286 Minnetonka 4 4 Montgomery 0 2 New Hope 1 0 Oakdale 0 1 Plymouth 0 2 Richfield 3 26 Roseville 0 2 St. Louis Park 11 2 St. Paul 18 30 Stillwater 0 3 Sun Fish Lake 0 14 West St. Paul 0 3 South St. Paul 0 3 TOTAL 325 943 Time of Day Time Number 2400 - 0559 49 0600 - 1159 318 1200 - 1559 205 1600 - 1959 336 2000 - 2359 376 TOTAL 1284 l�-3 MSP INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT SUMMARY OCTOBER 1989 BREAKDOWN OF NATURE OF COMPLAINT BY DATE Excess Early/Lt Lou Structual Heli- Sround Runuo Freo- RON Noise Flisht Flying Disturb. copters Noise uency Total DATE l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10/01/89 49 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 109 10/02/89 31 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 10/03/89 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 13 10/04/89 21 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 10/05/89 34 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 42 10/06/89 24 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 10/07/89 13 3 l 0 0 0 0 0 17 10/08/89 V 0- l 0 0 1 0 1 25 10/09189 35 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 43 10/10/89 44 1D 5 0 0 0 0 2 61 10/11/89 26 1 6 0 0 1 0 6 40 10/12/89 20 3 6 0 0 1 0 2 32 10/13/89 13 1 8 0 078 3 28 10/14/89 34 3 2 0 0 0 d B 47 10/15/89 35 2 2 0 0 0 0 11 7D 10/16/89 17 1 6- 0 0 0 1 1 26 10/17/89 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 19 10/18/99 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 18 :0/19189 IB 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 :0/20/89 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 12 10/21/89 7 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 24 10/22/89 41 0 4 0 1 3 0 2 51 10/i /B9 19 5 2 0 0 0 0 2 ZB 1D/24/89 33 1 3 0 0 2 0 9 48 10/:5189 83 14 6 0 0 3 0 20 126 10/26/89 55 13 12 0 0 2 0 18 100 10/27/89 26 12 2 0 0 1 0 4 45 10/28/89 35 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 44 10/29/89 43 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 50 10/30/89 25 5 1 1 0 0 0 5 37 10/31/89 18 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 2B TOTAL 1: 934 93 108 1 3 23 3 119 1284 TOTAL I: 72.71 7.21 8.41 0.11 0.22 1.81 0.21 9.31 100.01 MEMO TO: ALL EMPLOYEES FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 29p 1989 SUBJECT: HOLIDAYS Thanks to all of you for a most successful Thanksgiving donation drive. Between the groceries, turkey certificates and individual donations directly to the Community Action Council, City of Eagan employees raised in excess of $550. When our donation was dropped off at the CAC, one of the volunteers remarked that we were "the answer to a prayer." I'm certain your own Thanksgiving dinners tasted just a little bit better because of it! I've checked with the Community Action Council and they provided 625 meals for Thanksgiving this year. They depleted the food stuffs on their shelves to provide that many meals and even had to go out and purchase turkey certificates and other items to fill in. They're hoping to replenish their shelves between now and Christmas when the next big crunch comes for assistance. And speaking of Christmas. Attached is a memo from the Sunshine Club regarding the Armful of Love program. I know it's a difficult time of the year to come up with extra money but if it's hard for us, imagine what it must be like for the families who need this assistance. I hope you'll consider participating yet once again. Give yourself a gift this Christmas: the gift of giving. City Administrato TLH/kf p r November 28,1989 TO: ALL EMPLOYEES FROM: SUNSHINE COMMITTEE RE; ARMFUL OF LOVE - CHRISTMAS, 1989 This year marks the beginning of what, we hope, will be an annual sharing of our resources with area families at Christmas time. The Community Action Council has over 1000 families which will have a happier Christmas because somebody cares. There are several ways we can participate: 1. Sponsor a family and purchase clothes, games or toys for each family member. An average cost per item is $25.00. Information on specific families is forthcoming. 2. Make love baskets for a family or love cans/boxes for a Mom, Dad or Teenager. Love baskets include: flour/salt 5A sugar brown/powdered sugar shortening or oil peanut butter felly box oatmeal 24 popcorn bag hard candy roll aluminum foil,plastic wrap wax paper, sandwich bags dish detergent, 4 bars hard soap paper products: napkins, towels, toilet paper, tissues bag of chocolate chips Love can/box includes: 1 box band aids deck of cards a wash cloth a small towel a hot pad sample size cosmetics, toiletries ball point pens, pencils note cards scotch tape key chain mug roll of candy Christmas ornament book of stamps etc. 3. Give a $10 food certificate or miscellaneous food items. Please sign up individually, in groups or by department. The Christmas gifts should be brouqht to Marilyn, Liz, Karen, Lorene. of Dorothy at 'City Hall and to Nancy at Public Works. between Dec. 6 - 15. 63 CITY HALL Sorry, we're no longer involved in snow plowing, redevelopement, recycling, or public service . . . Now all we do is ATTEND KEETINGS! ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 5, 1989 CITY ATTORNEY Item 1. Executive Session to Consider Attorney/Client Privileged Information Regarding Bieter vs.. City of Eagan Lawsuit CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Snowmobile Usage Item 2. Establish Date for Special City Council Workshop DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Contract 89-18, Approve Change Order #1 (Lexington Way -Street Improvement) Item 2. Project 461, Reschedule Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road Improvements -O'Neil Property) /YY MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1989 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY Item 1. Executive Session to Consider Attorney/Client Privileged Information Regarding Bieter vs. City of Eagan Lawsuit --The City Attorney is requesting an executive session immediately following the City Council meeting to discuss privileged information regarding the Bieter vs. City of Eagan lawsuit. The meeting will be held in the office of the City Administrator. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Snowmobile Usage --Each year the City has reviewed policy regarding the operation of snowmobiles within the community. The present policy allows 1) snowmobiles to operate only within the City going from/to home and the use of snowmobile trails that are located in a regional park and 2) the snowmobiles must operate adjacent to City curbs or ride in ditch sections of County roads. Both the Director of Parks and Recreation on behalf of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and the Chief of Police are raising concerns ,regarding whether snowmobile usage should be allowed any longer within the community. Please refer to their memos enclosed on pages � throughL3 It is certainly appropriate for the City Council to discuss this item, however, since it was not placed on the formal agenda and any change in policy would impact residents throughout the community; it is suggested that the item be placed on a future City Council agenda. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: After discussion on this item, indicate a desire to maintain the existing policy or place on a future agenda a new policy that would restrict or prohibit the use of snowmobiles within the City. Item 2. Special City Council Workshop --The second phase of the R-4 Study that was commissioned by the City Council to meet with property owners and consider a downzoning or change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan designation for certain R-4 properties has been completed. The Director of Community Development is ready to present the information to the City Council for their review: The City Administrator has completed the Public Works Enterprise Fund Budget and would like to present that part of the budget, re -present the Equipment Revolving Fund and finalize any items within the General Fund at a workshop session so the 1990 General Fund and Public Works Enterprise Fund Budget can be adopted at the December 19 City Council meeting. Also, the City Administrator will present some ideas regarding health insurance, wage rates for non -collective bargaining personnel and request direction on both the Police Association and clerical contracts that are currently under negotiation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To establish a date for a special City Council workshop session. The date of Tuesday, December 12 is recommended. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Contract 89-18,.Approve Change Order #1 (Lexington Way -Street Improvement)- -This Change Order consists of three major parts described as follows: Part A: Lower existing water services to maintain minimum 7' of cover due to lowering of road bed. (Add $1,343.59) Part B: Remove existing 12" water main stub and valve in Diffley Road due to conflict with new water reservoir transmission water main. ($625.02) Part C: Remove driveway culverts and adjust existing sanitary manhole castings to accommodate change in boulevard grades to match existing lawn areas. (Add $1,774.55) Parts A & B will be the responsibility of the City's Water Utility Source & Supply Fund, and Part C will be added to the assessable costs of this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 89-18 (Lexington Way - Street Improvement) and authorize the Mayor to execute all related documents. Item 2. Project 461, Reschedule Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road Improvements - O'Neil Property) --On November 21, the City Council formally scheduled a public hearing for December 19, 1989, to discuss the proposed final assessments associated with the above -referenced project against the Robert O'Neil property. At that same meeting, the Council also scheduled a public hearing for Project 443 (Trunk Storm Sewer - O'Neil Property.). While both projects related to property owned by Robert & Grace O'Neil, individual legal descriptions of properties were not thesame for both projects. Subsequently, there was an error in the legal description used for notices published in the legal newspaper. / 90 Subsequently, it will be necessary for the Council to cancel the public hearing scheduled for December 19 for Project 461 and reschedule it to be held on January 2, 1990, for the referenced property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To cancel the scheduled public hearing of December 19, 1989, for Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road - O'Neil Property) and reschedule for January 2, 1990, for Parcels 010-56 and 010-77 in the south half of Section 10. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges u!uEGIM-W►I�i1Ti TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1989 RE: SNOWMOBILE USE The purpose of this memo concerns the question of allowing snowmobiles to operate within the City, given the existing ordinance. The existing ordinance provides for snowmobile operation, with certain provisions. Two key provisions are (1) they operate only within the City going from/to home and the use of snowmobile trails that are located in a regional park or to the south of Eagan, (2) they stay adjacent to City curbs or ride in ditch sections of County roads. Now that major County roads such as Cliff, Pilot Knob and Diffley have been upgraded, there is no ditch section available. Consequently, with few exceptions, it is almost impossible to ride (legally) from Eagan to the County Parks or trail sections to the south. Therefore, the question is should the City continue to keep the existing ordinance, or should the City recognize the improbability of legally riding in the City, and simply prohibit snowmobiles within the City? This issue has been raised by the public and informally by members of the Police Department. Perhaps we can get together with Chief Geagan on how best to proceed with this issue. KV/bls cc: Pat Geagan, Chief of Police police department ®F 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612) 454-3900 December 1„ 1989 TO: KEN VRAA, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POLICF%� SUBJECT: SNOWMOBILE.USE PATRICK J. GFAGAN Chet m Pallr< KENNETH D. ASZMANN aae uli OaPtO VAC ELLISON Maw THOMAS EGAN _ DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Cantil Members THOMAS HEDGES CKyF ne dm EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CtM Glen For several years, the Eagan Police Department Administration has felt it would be appropriate to prohibit snowmobiles within the City. As indicated in your memo, places where snowmobiles are now allowed are so limited that one almost needs to violate City Code by getting to the location. The current code tends to be violations occur off the roadway Officer. By the time violators in compliance with City Code. difficult to enforce, as many and out of site of a Patrolling reach a roadway, they tend to be If I can be of any further assistance in changing the ordinance to prohibit snowmobiles, please contact me. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police PJG:lb / 93 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE E)W' ............ 0: i., "M NNE$( �- T -A, . .. .......... 1, 19 A regular meeting of th4��)�agan Cit.y.'�.Obuncil was held on Tuesday, November 21, 1989, at the Eag$i":::,ftpj-qVa:1 Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and Councilmembers Wachter::-,--:7:::-:i-g-an, Gustafson and McCrea. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, and City Attorney James Sheldon. ........... AGENDA '::::: inf 6 ... i .. d the council that the City Administrator Tom Hedges. rae following items should be continued.: Consent Agenda Items - F (Final Plat, Stratford Oaks) and I (Amen&'aint tci::�'evelopment Contract, Hills of Stonebridge II) and Hear.'Ings - B (Project 443, Final Assessment Hearing O'Neil Sewer). He also stated that after the presentation to Unisys, there would be a special recognition for a recent winner of the Cash for Trash Program. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in..favor. favor. ............ November 9. 1989. Councilmember Egan reques.te.d::'a::'h :range on page 2, paragraph 1, the third sentence should read..Obb . i . 1 , ncilmember Egan asked if the drug problems were as serious as s Police Chief Geagan thought." He also requested an addition on page 21, paragraph 1, the first sentence should read "Mayor Ellison felt that $100,000 Per acre for park property was too much." Councilmember Gustafson queA.I.OR45: regarding "ENAC" on page 16, paragraph 2. The first 66hten , pe is changed to read "Cindy Ellis (ENAC - Eagan Noise Abatement coj&fiitted�'.::'explained that ENAC was a noise abatement citizens, group." McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the minutes for the November 9, 1989 regular Council meeting as amended. All voted in favor. November 14, 1989. Ellison moved, McCrea seconded, the mo ion to approve the minutes for the November 14, 1989 sOq meeting as presented. All voted in favor. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 2 SPECIAL RECOGNITION 0 .,.UNISYS 'CO iiPORATION/HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOLi6:;::it7A&2�}: CpI;LECTION Kris Hageman presented the recognition award. She recapped the day's activities and the amounts collected. Roger Martin (Unisys - Manager - Environmental Management) reported that the household hazardous waste collection day,was a good cause and he hoped it would be an annual event. Mayor E113award. CASH FOW TRASH:::: Kris Hageman presented the::<'Ca:sh for Trash award to Victoria Jabbra. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/CINNAMON RIDGE ADDITION REQUEST TO CONVEY PRIVATE STREETS FOR PUBLIC MAINTENANCE Public Works Director Tom Colbert introduced the item and presented the staff report..;.,.., He stated that representatives were informed of the Problemsiora ected with City maintenance. He recommended denial of the request ::::::::::::::::::::::.:,..... Councilmember McCrea asked ::`Chat wop W::;happen if the request were denied. Mr. Colbert stated thiat::::::ttfii:::::fiomeowners must maintain the streets. Councilmember Egan cor4ftn.ted''that the work would be assessed against the landowners' prFip?rties and that the homeowners could do the work cheaper themselves. Councilmember Wachter questioned the size of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Colbert explained the dimensions. Councilmember Wachter pointed out that it was City policy that...;; Ci;ty.,.,.,...specifications be met. Mayor Ellison and Councilmember:;:::::;gan:::;greed: Councilmember Gustafson recommended denial in the future for....private.streets. Rick Matheson, 4585 Horizon Cittle,Was present for the Cinnamon Ridge discussion. He pointed out::::::;that:::::::be did not reside in the development but had rental properties. He ,requested City maintenance of the streets and listed his reasons. He pointed out that the residents did not have any money and that the streets did not meet standards. He further stated that the City had allowed the streets to be built. Councilmember Gustafson asked if the'::Yesidents would be willing to be assessed for the upgrad'e;;: Mr:;:::;#Satheson stated the residents would accept special assessiatts:::;:::Ciiiincx:lmember Egan reported that the City allowed the private streets because it expected the Homeowners' Association to maintain the*X: He felt there should be a better escrow fund. Councilmember McCrea commented that the developer was responsible and not the homeowners. There was further discussion regarding the street maintenance. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 3 Councilmember Gustafson ':...ggested a:>ieighborhood meeting to work out a plan. Councilmember Mtl0'raa::guest'�oned if a delay would create objections. Public Works Dirdbt'6r:::Toii Colbert stated he was unsure. Councilmember McCrea reported that HUD owned 60% of the development. City Administrator Tom Hedges felt that Councilmember Gustafson's approach was sound and stated..,. that questions could be pursued. Councilmember Wachter fel::t::::::::>;saiTi:; set a bad precedent. Councilmember Egan felt tkieY rre ........ ed for consent from several associations. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to deny the request to convey private streets and Ciiil.. ..ac1.1, r Public maintenance within the Cinnamon Ridge Addition. All,voted::ih favor. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT/ ARCHITECT SELECTION/BLACKHAWK PARK SHELTER BUILDING City Administrator Tom;:;.Hedges introduced the item and informed the Council that the firm:::;o ::::;.:,Schwarz/Weber was recommended for selection. Park and Recreations::`Parr!. Ken Vraa explained the selection process. Councilmember Egan reported;;;'that::10, warz/Weber had done excellent work in the past. He further::::stated that Bob Vanney's office was located in Eagan. Mr. Vraa,:.commented that Vanney's office also did excellent work and that the decision was a tough choice. Councilmember McCrea asked if the selection was just for the Blackhawk Park shelter. Mr. Vraa stated there were currently two proposals with three other:..Stielt.ers...:.Councilmember McCrea requested the cost of operation for::;:;pazJES:::Mayiii::Ellison commented the City should not reinvent the wheel with redesigned shelters. Gustafson moved, Wachter secoli0ed, ;:::the motion to approve the selection of Schwarz/Weber to :perforiti:;:;park shelter design of Blackhawk Park and design/construction::administration for three additional City parklands. All voted in favor. LEXINGTON POINTE 4TH & 5TH ADDITIONS/ PARK ACQUISITION/TRAPP.FARM PARK Bill Ipson, 4340 Hamilton, presentea'a petition regarding Trapp Park. He requested the City,:,P. and the sled hill. He read the petition to the Coilb&M-H �® .0.8ted the City Council take prompt action and urged passage of a tree ordinance. He explained there were 69 signatures on the pe�ition and that Tri -Land Development had developed their neighborhorld:. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 4 ...... Councilmember Gustafson :::.;Vestioned ;:::the petition language. Mayor Ellison pointed out that a13::;of the h33 was not park property. Mr. Ipson commented that the petiti3tiiies:;:fiayts been led to believe that the park would remain as is. COu'fid-Ithdkber Wachter stated he felt the developer needed to protect the trees which were close to the street. Councilmember McCrea pointed out that the trees would be removed when homes were built. City Administrator Tom Hedges explained that several options were being,_explored and. that the item would be back before the Council at one of f;:iiesrt:?;#Ysp::Cquncil meetings. CONSENT'=AGENDA i:[: A. Personnel Items. 1. Health Insurance Providers for 1590. Councilmember McCrea asked if the City paid for the entire family coverage. City Administrator Tom Hedges replied that the City did pay for the entire family coverage and that both union and non-union compared to other municipality.. ,Costs. It was recommended to apprtive:;tbe.:..group health (including adult preventive dental), Med-Centers.:dnd VIM.Health Insurance proposals as the three health insurance plans::::which,.,.w;ill: be offered by the City of Eagan to its employees for 2. Lead Construction Inspdcto"r. It was recommended to approve the appointment of William Bruestle as lead construction inspector for the City of Eagan. B. Plumbers Licenses. It was recommended to approve the plumbers licenses for Andreasen Plumbing & Heating and Wyllie Plumbing. C. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated the date was set for December 5, 1989 at 8:00 p.m. with the reserve date of December 19, 1989. It was recommended to approve the date:::Of December 5, 1989 as the official date for the public hearing ::tb consider the proposed increase in property taxes.:.:::far::::::;7990::::: }d December 19, 1989 as the alternate date if. }::>tlt:::;::ieeiled; both meetings to begin a+ C • fl f1 n m _ EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 5 It was recommended to `a.i'�knowledge:completion of Project 88-UU (Dart Transit - Utilities)the release of related financial securities subject to appropriate warranty provisions. E. It was (Blue Ridge release of I7 .7 Li CC Lo auu �..iii-icci . recommended to4-6k3i0 3?'p �jB..completion of Project 87 -II Addition - Streets ::and t3 �lities) and authorize the related financial a.6.Curities subject to appropriate City Administrator Tom Hedges it matter should be continued indefinitely. It was recommended Stratford Oaks. G. It 5th Add H. the Council that the to continue indefinitely the final plat for It was recommended Addition. to approve the final or Whispering Woods plat for Mardelann I. Amendment to Development Contract Hills of Stonebridge II. City Administrator Tom-::iiiige5:iiioxiled the Council that the matter was to be continued to ::the December 5, 1989 City Council meeting. It was recommended to continu*:the aisendment to the development contract for the Hills of Stonebridge II to include a revised Exhibit B, to the December 5, 1989 City Council meeting. Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the consent agenda items as amended, and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. DEPART1+gT::'ff D'-0U53XESS Mike Reardon (Cable Commission) presented mugs to the Council. Fire Chief Southorn informed the Council that the aerial repair matter had been settled. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 6 LEXINGTON PARKWAYfQRAINAGE,:t►SEMENT VACATION City Administrator Tom Hedtj2s'iitroduced the item. Public Works Director Tom Colbert presented the information to the Council. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the vacation of.,.the drainage easement as described over portions of;::::7a4kG::8:::::9::::; 10 and 11, of Block 2, Lexington Parkway Addition, and aiitUbr zd:::the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted i'::favor. PROJECT 443/O'NEIL:;.�::TRUNK{:;;STORM SEWER/ FINAL :1kSEFSMt:tARING City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended cancelling the final assessment hearing and rescheduling the matter for December 19, 1989. Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to cancel the public hearing regarding the...,_final assessment roll for Project 443 (O'Neil - Trunk Storm Sew6tl::::ai7d reschedule the matter for a new public hearing on December 19, 199=4:i::Ax:l;..voted in favor. SPECIAL HUNTING SEASON::PERMIT/,it1CJ3ARD MAURER, JR. City Administrator Tom 414iw .ekplained to the Council that City Code needed clarification. He':pointed out that Mr. Maurer had not yet met with the Police Department but that Police Chief Geagan recommended approval contingent upon police department review. He further pointed out that NML may own the property. Councilmember Gustafson favor.ed::;the;.:Maurer request. Councilmember Wachter felt bow and arrow hilikY?q::;ws::#1tit: as dangerous but that the hunting in Eagan was piece-mea1....C'6uncilmember Gustafson felt the Council should reverse its motion :;regarding the DNR issue. Councilmember Egan commented that riow and:::arrow hunting in the river area was not as efficient as slug !i#ntinq::He stated he did not have a problem with the issue. Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve regulations that allow for a special deer hunt with a bow and arrow as requested by Richard Maurer, Jr. for properties owned by Harold Becker, Jerry Scott Krueger and Richard Maurer, subject;to the police department's review. Gustafson, Ellison, Egan and McCrea voted in favor; Wachter voted against. COVENTRY PASS SECOND ADDITION/PRELIMINARY PLAT City Administrator Tom Hedges and Coihmunity Development Director Dale Runkle introduced the matter. RAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 ......... ............... ............... Page 7 ........... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Gustafson moved, McCrea:::::::.reconded,.:::::::..the motion to approve the i -:-d Addition as presented by preliminary plat for Covent-....:::.'ass::::::... United Mortgage Corporation, subj:dixt-'::td:'the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, El. 2. No direct drivewaya'c'de":::::; odd Road shall be allowed. Forty -foot setbacks shall be requiet . d aloA;q:::Dodd Road. 3. The development is requ ' i ' k& ' to iiiintain a maximum depth of 8 :."t of feet of cover on the exist in the southwest corner the development. 4. The development is responsible for any damage which may occur to any existing City public utility line which results from the proposed site grading and development. 5. The development will::::-be:j::required to match the existing street grades provided in the adjoin development. 6. The development is rep'ired to::s;Where to the City's maximum 3:1 slope criteria. 7. The development ii::�:i?64uired to provide storm sewer to adequately accommodate the storm water runoff which is currently conveyed by the rural ditch section along Dodd Road. S. The development will be required to provide emergency overland outlets from all low areas. 9. A storm sewer outlet is required for Block 4 to collect the storm water runoff water in the backyard lo.w area. 10. A 50 foot half right-of-way:AJ reg" zed for Dodd Road. 11. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main stubs to all adjacent properties as determined by City staff. All voted in favor. MINNESOTA -:4.0 , U.RNAL::A-RJTICLE "DEFINING A CORRiW::.V0,.R::AikRAFT DEPARTURES" .... I.:_ .......... City Administrator Tom Hedges requiisted Council direction and asked if Eagan staff should also prepar . 6 .'-an article. councilmembers were in agreement that the City should draft an article for EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 8 publication in a future copy of the M}nnesota Journal representing the City's view of the::;.agan/Mendota Heights corridor. City Administrator Tom Hedges intorSle(i;;:::;:ti2:;:: Council that staff would prepare the article. PROJECT 461/YANKEE DOODLE ROAD/O'NEIL PROPERTY REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING Public Works Director it:CciZt7ea+t:ktp9ated the Council regarding the background of the matter. -. - McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to receive the revised final assessment roll fa:::projeet 461 (Yankee Doodle Road - Streets and Utilities) andse#aeiil `a::p.lc hearing for December 19, 1989, as it pertains to Parcels 010-56:2i1id 010-77, in Section 10. All voted in favor. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRADE Tom Hedges distributed_.....information concerning the Minnesota Department of Trade and requested::direction by the Council. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded:i:::the motion to unanimously recognize the importance of high technolpgy industries to the local, state and national economies;,.;ree4ga:ze the beneficial impact of international trade and compet�t:loh`' on the economic growth and development of Minnesota's:;::::tdchnology-intensive industries; to strongly commit to the appropriate utilization of the Unisys Semi -conductor facility; and to commit to facilitating productive investment in the Unisys facility, and warmly welcome the important contribution that investment in the facility would make to both the local community and statewide..econPulic..g.roWth. All voted in favor. COVNdit DISCUS'S'I'ON There was discussion regarding the trail plowing policy. Councilmember McCrea felt the Couno. l shQi# d not revisit the matter. Councilmember Egan agreed. City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council there would be an executive session after the Council meeting regarding threatened litigation. Councilmember Wachter asked for a ;status report regarding the tree ordinance. City Administrap17$t::Vtitor,:,:,:.>:.o3R..:::::Hedges replied that the ordinance was on hold pending ion. Councilmember Egan informed the Counc;il:';of a public hearing which was scheduled for December 6, 1989 to co#$ider the Seneca project at the State Senate hearing. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 9 Councilmember McCrea asked if all letters from citizens were put in personnel files. City Admib!4trator To1a:Hedges replied yes. Councilmember McCrea reii&A tY that the training of public officials was crucial in such matters as the Inver Grove Heights' situation. Councilmember McCrea had concerns regarding transitional housing and felt the City should nct::s:wabusing people. She felt the City should help people become"'seifl—;, ient. Councilmember McCrea felt tha;:police::,department needed cultural sensitivity training. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the checklist dated November 21, 1989 in the amount of $483,744.69. All voted in favor. :AZJ.QUT?NMENT Wachter moved, McCrea seconddtiy:::>the motion to adjourn the November 21, 1989 City Council:ajieeting- aV:2:25 p.m. to the Executive Session. All voted in favor. OF EAGAN City Clerk i "THE MORNING AFTER" December 5, 1989 "The Morning After" is an extremely brief report of the action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on December 5, 1989. There are no details reported in this account; however, the action taken by the City Council on each of the agenda items and each of the other business items is reflected. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS w * * w 1. A resolution was approved requesting a continuance of the MASAC item concerning the presentation of the Mendota Heights study to their January 23 meeting. 2. Payment was authorized to Cable TV North Central from retained franchise SM- fees for the installation of cable service, both I -Net and Sub -Net, to Fire Stations 4 and 5 at the reduced cost of $6,063.66. 3. The Dakota County Highway 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program was approved as modified. 4. The Mission Statement as developed by the Eagan Police Department was �ii� approved. �. Direction was given to City staff to prepare a policy/ordinance disallowing snowmobile usage in the City. CONSENT AGENDA Aadt 6. The resignation of Patrol Officer Tomma A. Freundschuh was accepted effective December 17, 1989. 7. The creation of the position of Investigative Sergeant in the Police Department was approved effective in December 1989, and approval was given to the appointment of Sergeant Ken Conyers to this position. 8. The appointment of Officer Steven Grimm to the position of Patrol Sergeant was approved effective in December 1989. 9. A $.50 per hour incentive for all Winter Recreation Leaders who complete !� the season was approved. 10. Approval was given to the attached list of persons as Winter Recreation Leaders for the 1989-90 winter season. 14 An amusement devise license for Summit Amusement for 37 amusement machines, at Pockets located at 2020 Silver Bell Road was approved. A resolution requesting a MnDOT speed limit study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff Road to Diffley Road) was approved. The amendment to the development contract for the Hills of Stonebridge II was continued indefinitely. Acceptance of the barn donated to the City by West Publishing was approved 15. Approvals were given to 1) the application for an exemption from lawful gambling license for the Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis and 2) a waiver to allow the State to grant the license as soon as possible. 16 dVr 17 L 18 19 20 21 Tr 22 23 24 25 26 The final plat for Town Centre 100 5th Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) was continued indefinitely until such time as all documentation is in order. The final plat for George W. Giles Addition was approved. Completion of Contract 88-10 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th and 10th Addition -Streets 6 Utilities) was acknowledged and the 7th and final payment to Richard Knutson, Inc. was authorized. Completion of Contract 88-30 (South Oaks Addition -Streets & Utilities) was acknowledged and the 8th and final payment to Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc. in the amount of $9,225.14 was authorized. Completion of Contract 88 -KK (Community of Joy Church -Utilities) was acknowledged. Completion of Contract 85-R (UPS -Utilities) was acknowledged. Completion of Contract 88-32 (Well #12-Pumphouse & Facilities) was acknowledged and the 5th and final payment to Shingobee Builders, Inc, in the amount of $12,337.71 was authorized. The request to vacate a sanitary sewer and utility easement (Thomas Lake and Diffley Road) was received and a public hearing scheduled for January 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS The public hearing was closed and approval given to the vacation of the westerly right-of-way of Lexington Way. The public hearing was closed and approval given to the vacation of excess public right-of-way for that portion of T.H. 13. The public hearing was closed and approval given to the vacation of a portion of Cedarvale Boulevard subject to receipt of clear title opinion from applicant's attorney. 27. The public hearing was closed and Project 574 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park-Streetliglits) was approved as modified. 28. The public hearing was closed and Project 583 (Park Center Addition -Streets & Utilities) was continued until the December 19, 1989 meeting. 29. The public hearing was closed and Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -Storm Sewer) was approved. 30. The public hearing was closed and authorization given to property tax levy certification to Dakota County for collectible 1990. Also, the proposed 1990 General Fund Budget was continued to the December 19 meeting for final ratification. 31 W, 33 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS The 1989 and 1990 installments of special assessments on HUD purchased property, including interest and penalties due to Dakota County was approved, and authorization was given to the prepayment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. The 1990 fee schedule was approved. The proposed amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance were approved. 34. A variance request by Tim and Connie White for a side yard setback to accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of their existing single-family home at Lot 5, Block 2, Oak Chase 3rd Addition was approved. 35 �� 37 An extension on the preliminary plat for Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church until November 30, 1990 was approved. An off -sale liquor license for Cheers Wine and Spirits to be located at the Rahncliff Crossings was continued indefinitely. Action was taken to defer off -sale liquor license applications until a workshop in January. A conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor at Xavier's Restaurant was continued until the February 6, 1,990 City Council meeting. A conditional use permit to allow outside storage in an L-1 district requested by A & R Pallet Crating was approved. 40. A planned development amendment for Rahncliff Crossings, Inc. to revise the overall pylon sign exhibit was approved. 41. A formal reimbursement in the amount of $1,470 as dedication credit for parkland that was previously dedicated to the City as a part of the Blackhawk Park PUD to Horne Development Corporation was approved. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA 42. A special City Council workshop session was set for December 12 at 6:30 p.m. 43. Change Order #1 to Contract 89718 (Lexington Way-.Street Improvement) was approved. 44. The scheduled public hearing of December 19 for Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road-O'Neil Property) was cancelled and rescheduled for January 2 for Parcels 010-56 and 010-77 in the south half of Section 10. 45. At the City Attorney's request, an executive session was held immediately following the .City Council meeting to discuss privileged information regarding the Bieter vs. City of Eagan lawsuit. 46. All bills were approved and ordered paid. WINTER RECREATION LEADERS FOR 1989-1990 Returnlne StafT: New StatT: Brad Czubernat Sara Berkebile Kevin Duffy Barry Billmeyer Mike Geere Pat Boquist Tim Gill Troy Christopherson Andy Halvorsen Jami Lee Cullen Cory Lynch, Rob De Rosier Tim McElligott Chris Fitch Tom McNurlin Tyrone Johnson Jeff Olson Shane Johnson Brent Tait Shannon Kerry John Tracy Roger Ketterline Tom Wise Kent Knutson Brandon Kusnier Steven Lakler Catherine Liberty Daniel McNamara Ray Sperl Pete Walters David Wang Theresa Bland Aaron Godleski Wayne Leseman w AIEN10 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEmBER 4, 1989 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL.INFORMATION FOR DECEMBER 5, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. I -NET Services to Fire Stations #4 and #5 --Enclosed and referenced as page 1A is a letter of response from Cable TV North Central regarding the City's request to eliminate any cost for the I -NET services to Fire Stations #4 and #5. CONSENT A. Personnel Items Item 5. Winter Recreation Leaders --The following additional persons are recommended for hire as Winter Recreation Leaders by Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi: Theresa Bland Aaron Godleski Wayne Leseman F. Lawful Gambling License --The Police Department has concluded their review of the lawful gambling license exemption/Transportation Club of St. Paul application and find no reason to deny the application. PUBLIC HEARINGS G. Proposed Property Tax Levy Certification/1990 General Fund --Enclosed is a handout for any residents who are present at the public hearing to learn more about the proposed property tax levy certification and 1990 general fund budget. This information is referenced as pages 103A through 103E. NEW BUSINESS G. Conditional Use Permit for Xavier's Restaurant to Allow On -Sale Liquor in a CSC District --The APC minutes for this item are enclosed on pages 158A and 158B. H: Conditional Use Permit, A & R Pallet Crating to Allow Outside Storage in an IA District--The APC minutes for this item are enclosed on pages 163A and 163B. I. Planned Development Amendment for Rahnclift Crossings, Inc., to Revise the Overall Pylon Sign Exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development --The APC minutes for this item are enclosed on page 167A. INFORMATIVE There are three additional informative items: TRI•LAND PARTNERSHIP/ICE ARENA PROJECT UPDATE The Economic Development Commission heard a presentation by Tri -Land Partnership and gave consideration to the tax increment financing application that Tri -Land is requesting for their ice arena project. Since Tri -Land Partnership •made application for TIF, they have hired Publicorp„ Inc. to work on the application and it was learned at the EDC meeting that the application is intended as a land write-down which is different than the original application. The City Administrator has drafted a letter, see the attached copy on pages through A(o that requests some specific information so that the EDC and possibly Finance Committee of the City Council can further review the application. ANNUAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHRISTMAS LUNCHEON. The annual Dakota County Chamber of Commerce Christmas Luncheon which includes the Person of the Year presentation is scheduled for Wednesday, December 13 at the Mendakota Country Club. Again, the Chamber is requesting that each person attending the luncheon bring a toy that will be donated to the Community Action Council for either the Robert B. Lewis House or Armful of Love. Please let the City Administrator know at the City Council meeting whether you will be planning to attend so that we can make the necessary reservations. M`NVCC RESPONSE TO PAYMENT OF $5.000 TO EACH RESIDENT The City has received a response from the Metropolitan Waste Control. Commission regarding Council action at the October 3 meeting requesting that the commission pay $5,000 to each resident of the Wuthering Heights neighborhood in addition to a requirement that the MWCC make certain utility connections for the neighborhood. Attached and referenced as page W is •a copy of the letter. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Z0'"d' ld'101 E1 001 6661r'/0E/11 1t7ZlIN .... ....... ... ........ Abrdi Central November 28, 1969 Mike Reardon Burnevllie/Eagan Cable Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 934 Woodhill _Drive Roseville, MN 55113 612493-9999 Dear Mike; In response to your letter of November 20, 1989, I will provide to you, In writang, the *actions of the ordinance that we have previously discussed on the phone. As a matter of background, Group W and the Commission, established an Initial service area. As additional homes were built, the density of 40 homes per mile must be reached in order for the Company to extend cable plant to those homes. If one sees•that this was, established as It was b , not cost affective to extend plant when virtually no subscribers existed. Caraln government facilities, which existed at that time, were specifically mentioned In the proposal and cable plant was: extended to them at that time. The franchise envisioned that the area would grow and that now residential spring as well as the community llsthoae reedents.The franchise covered extension of plant to these services facilities se follows' Article III, Section 7 - listed the Institutions and further stated "and such other public Institutions within 200 feet of existing Institutional network as the city may from time to time designate in substitution thereof or In addition :thereto ° The language in the Burnsville and Eagan Ordinance are the same. I hope that this clarifies the situation for you. Both of these ffrestations were built atter the franchise was awarded and were built away from both existing subscriber and Institutional network plant locatlone. Obviously, had they been within 200 feet, we would not have mentioned a charge at all, Please let me know If I can be of •further assistance. Sincerely, Kathl Donnelly -Cohen Director of Public Affaire 3.7% 220%. 17.3% 57.0% INDEPENDENT SCHOOL. DISTRICT 196 OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS DAKOTA COUNTY CITY OF EAGAN SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED 1990 TAX ( City Estimate ) 3.9% 2&1% 21A% 46.6% The 1989 special legislative,, session withdrew state aid from titles and gave It to school districts. This shift will require titles to raise their tax levy to compensate for this loss. By law,,school districts are required to lower their tax levy by the. same amount of state ald'they received from the cities. There Is no net change In property taxes as a result of this state aid'. redistribution. However, each tazingijurlsdiction may still adjust their specific levy'amount. r COMPARISON OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FOR MY SERVICES: 1989 AND 1990 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC WORKS PARKS & RECREATION CONTINGENCY TOTAL General GovemmerA • Mayor,Council • Administration • Data Processing • Finance/City Clerk e Legal • Community Development • Cable'TV Public Safety e Police e Fire Park & Recreation a Parks,& Recreation • Forestry Public Works • Public Works/Engineering • Streets& Highways s Central Services/ Maintenance 1989 53,122;910( 28.7%) $3,138,640 ( 29.1%) 3,807,820 ( 96.3%) 4,078,110'( 37.9%) 1,998,010 ( 19.0%) 1;941,610 ( 18.0%) 1,452,960'( 13.9%) 1,568,560 ( 14.6%) 114;080 (01.1%). 40,210 ( 00.4%) $10,495;780 (100:0%) $10,767,130 (100.0%) PROPOSED 1990 ausvx[aur id[u:en mrtiMmcr co.s� . naic svEr* car: act a General Fund Budget Proposed Increase Is 2.6% or $271,350. • The Metropolitan Council shows a population Increase of 3.5% from 1988 to 1989, the estimated 1989 population used Is 44;058. s The consumer price Index for Minneapolis/St.'PaulIncreased by 4.0%•for thefirst half of 1989 over the first half of 1988. a The proposed budget Is attempting to maintain a constant level of services, not to expand programs and/or services. a General Fund personnel Increase for, 1990 Include one police officer and a ten hour Increase to one clerical position. s The City's 1990 payable tax base Is, expected to grow by approximately 14.1% from the payable 1989 base. • Personnel costs constitute 70.5% of the General Fund Budget as local government services are labor Intensive. r 26A% 619% 119% 1989 TAX 14.7% 022% 04.9% GENERAL FUND SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR CITY OF EAGAN FEES, PERMM LICENSES, CNARGES„ETC. PROPERTYTAXES STATE AID TOTAL TAX LEVY GENERAL FUND DEBT SERVICE EOUIPMENT REVOLVING MAJOR STREET lP3 Q - PROPOSED 1980 PROPOSED 1990 25A% 727% 01.9% 60A% 12.3% 02.6% 04.5% RUDEXP GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Actual Actual Budget -Dept Request Admn Request 10-10-89 ____________ 1987 1988 ____________ 1989 ____________ 1990 ____________ 1990 ____________ 1990 ___________ GENERAL GOVERNMENT - O1 Mayor & Council S 71,522 E 54;586 E '57,100 $ 71,010 S 71.,010 $ 71,010 02 Administration 336,387 354,066 415;630 701,160 424,205 424,210 03 Data Processing. 131,799 190,473 346,250 403,890 268,760 268;760 05 Finance/Ci;ty Clark 508,258 ,557„782 622;680 687,710 680,210 680,210 06 Legal 21,7,185 306,031 260•,000 -440,000 390,000, 390,000 07 Community Development 761,063 1,101,152 1,281,420 1,454„190 1,269,260 1,255,.110 10 Cable TV 38,488 148,660 139,830 49,340 49,340 ____________ 49,340 ------------ ............ $ ____________ 2,064,702 ............ E 2,712,750 ____________ ____________ $ 3,122,910 ____________ ____________ $ 3,807;300' ____________ E. 3,152,785 ____________ S 3,138,640 ____________ PUBLIC SAFETY 1.1 Police 8 2,198,808 E 2,628;868 S 3,093',920 $ 3,567,790 8.3,544,650 $ 3,369,870 12 Fire 507,170 478,699 713,900 770,592 725,350 708,240 S 2,705,978 A 8,107,567 S 3,807;820 S 4,338,382 E 4,270,000 $ 4,078,110 PUBLIC WORKS' ------------ ... ............ ............ ............ ------------ -----_.__... 21 Public Works Engineering S 561,954 $ 632,458 8 646,200 $ 727,.100 S 712,400 $ 677,900 ,22 Streets & Highways 1.,255,312 964,995 1,027;450 1,,128,490 893,670 946,670 24 Central Services Maintenance _ 250,583. 324,360 401,080 317,040 317,040 $ 1,817.,266 E 1,848,036 $ 1,998,010 $ 2,256,670 $ 1,923,1.10 $ 1,941,610 ____________ PARKS& RECREATION ------------ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ 31 Parks & Recreation S 1,,082,054 S 1,290,368 $ 1,362,760 E 1,648,900 $ 1,518,310 8 1,470,810 32 Forestry ____________ 65,747 70,155 ____________ 90,200 ____________ 164,530 ____________ 97„750 ____________ 97,.750 ------------ S 1,147„801 S 1,360,523 8 .1,452,960 $ 1,813,430 S 1,616,060 $ 1,568,560 OTHER ............. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 41 Contingency ____________ - - ____________ S 114,080 ____________ S 0 ____________ E' '0 ____________ E 40,210 ____________ E ............ - S - ............ 8 114,080 ............ $ 0 ............ $ 0 ............ E 40,210 ............ TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES S 7,735,747 S 9,028,876 $10,495.,780 $12,215,782 $10,961,955 $10,767,130 1 906WCSR TOTAL GENERAL FUND 7,946,875 8,767,274 10,495„780 828,570 10,768,220 10,767,130 ------------------------------------------ CITY OF EAGAN GENERAL 'FUND: COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 10-10-89 1987 1988 1989 4-30-89 1990 1990 REVISED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Y.T.D. ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TA%ES 3,931.,622 4,456,200 5,700,050 195,960 6,484,240 7,824,060 LICENSES 66,752 62,846 74,770 14,187 78,140 78,140 PERMITS 988,144 964,991 926,630 229,388 816,700 816,700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1„350,075 1,367,149 .2,023,570 0 1,544,330 204;530 CHARGES FOR SERVICES- 520,829 588;667 565,480 131„095 606,150 606,150 RECREATION CHARGES 80;560 116,407 80,600 70;172- 112,950 146,840 ,FINES AND. FORFEITS- 134;445 177,468, 150,000. 49,201 190,000 190,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 225,581 203,019 153,000 10,599 131,600 131,600 PROGRAM REVENUES 609,507 788,557 766,.180 127,968 754,110 719,110 TRANSFERS 39,360 41,970 55;500 0 50,000 50;000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 7,946,875 8,767,274 10,495„780 828,570 10,768,220 10,767,130 ------------------------------------------ MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 28, 1989 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, November 28, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Voracek, Graves, Trygg, Merkley, Gorman and Hoeft. Also present were Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch, City Planner Jim Sturm and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. AGENDA Chairman Pawlenty informed the Commission that the applicants requested a continuance of Item I (Diffley/Cedar Planned Development - Koldt Properties) and Item F (Eagan Center 5th Addition - Tri -Land Partnership). Graves moved; Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. MINUTES October 24, 1989. Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the October 24,, 1989 Advisory Planning Commission minutes as presented. Pawlenty, Voracek, Graves, Trygg., Merkley and Hoeft voted in favor; Gorman abstained. XAVIER'S RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Pawlenty opened the first public hearing for the evening regarding a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor in a Community Shopping Center district located on Lot 3, Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition along Town Centre Drive in the Northwest Quarter of Section 15. City Planner Jim Sturm introduced the matter to the Commission. The manager of Xavier's Restaurant was present .at the meeting for questions,. Trygg moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor in a Community Shopping Center district located on Lot 3, Block 1, Town. Centre 100 6th Addition along Town Centre Drive in the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, as requested by Xavier's Restaurant, subject to the following conditions: All applicable ordinances. EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 28, 1989 Page 2 2. Any necessary permits are approved by the City Police Department. All voted in favor. A & R PALLET CRATING'- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow outside storage in a Light Industrial district located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located east of Highway 3 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36. City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the application for the Commission. Art Mulvihill informed the Commission he had no objections to planting the requested trees. He gave a history of the property. He reported that the company was currently piling the pallets 14 feet high. He explained the manufacturing process. Commissionmember Graves questioned the stacking height limitation. He felt the whole area should be reviewed. He asked why the applicant was requesting a permit when the pallets were presently located on the property. Commissionmember Merkley asked if further trailers would be provided. Mr. Mulvihill replied he was unsure. Commissionmember Merkley stated the number of trailers should be limited. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the meaning of the word,"materials" in proposed condition number 2. Mr.. Mulvihill explained that "materials" referred to lumber. He reported that he did not want the number of trailers, limited and pointed out that he currently owns 18 trailers. Commissionmember Merkley had concerns regarding the leasing of trailers. Commissionmember Graves commented that he would rather have trailers than pallets. Commissionmember Voracek reported that the property has a permit to run a truck terminal and that trailers are allowed to be.parked on the property. Commissionmember Trygg questioned the 10 foot limitation in proposed condition number 2. City Planner Jim Sturm explained that the 10 foot limitation would reduce the impact to other properties. Commissionmember Gorman had concerns that the stacking of pallets could be a possible fire hazard. Mr. Mulvihill felt it was not a concern. Commissionmember Merkley stated that the terminal permit was not needed' and asked if it could be revoked as,a condition. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained that the permit could be voluntarily revoked =IV EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 28, 1989 Page 2 2. Any necessary permits are approved by the Department. All voted in favor. A & R PALLET CRATING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Police Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow outside storage in a Light Industrial district located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located east of Highway 3 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36. City Planner Commission. Art Mulvihill planting the req reported that th high. He explained Jim Sturm summarized the application for the informed the Commission he had no objections to nested trees. He gave a history of the property. He e company was currently piling the pallets 14 feet the manufacturing process. Commissionmember Graves questioned the stacking height limitation. He felt the whole area should be reviewed. He asked why the applicant was requesting a permit when the pallets were presently located on the property. Commissionmember Merkley asked if further trailers would be provided. Mr. Mulvihill replied he was unsure. Commissionmember Merkley stated the number of trailers should be limited. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the meaning of the word "materials" in proposed condition number 2. Mr. Mulvihill explained that "materials" referred to lumber. He reported that he did not want the number of trailers limited and pointed out that he currently owns 18 trailers. Commissionmember Merkley had concerns regarding the leasing of trailers. Commissionmember Graves commented that he would rather have trailers than pallets. Commissionmember Voracek reported that the property has a permit to run a truck terminal and that trailers are allowed to be parked on the property. Commissionmember Trygg questioned the 10 foot limitation in proposed condition number 2. City Planner Jim Sturm explained that the 10 foot limitation would reduce the impact to other properties. Commissionmember Gorman had concerns that the stacking of pallets could be a possible fire hazard. Mr. Mulvihill felt it was not a concern. Commissionmember Merkley stated that the terminal permit was not needed and asked if it could be revoked as a condition. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained that the permit could be voluntarily revoked 1C .3A EAGAN,ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES' November 28,, 1989 Page 3 as a condition. Chairman Pawlenty had questions regarding interim use. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained the required procedure. Graves moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow outside storage in a Light Industrial district located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located east of Highway 3 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, as requested by A & R Pallet -Crating,, subject to the following conditions: 1. All outside storage areas and non -paved areas shall be sodded or seeded to control dust and run-off. 2. Outside storage of pallets and materials shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 3. The applicant shall plant staggered growth of evergreens May 31, 1990. All voted in favor. and maintain a triple row of along the north property line by RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow a drive-thru facility on Lot 3, Block 3, Rahncliff 2nd Addition located south of Cliff Road and west of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32 - City Planner Jim Sturm explained the application to 'the Commission. Mark Smith (Rahncliff) reported that they would make the traffic flow one way. He pointed out that all requirements had been met and that the employee parking was in the rear of the building. Commissionmember Graves had questions regarding the traffic flow. Mr. Smith stated that the flow would be the same. Commissionmember Graves felt that the City would be inviting a difficult situation. Commissionmember Hoeft asked if a menu would be displayed outside. Mr. Smith showed the proposed location of the menu. Commissionmember Hoeft remarked that the stacking of cars was also a concern. Commissionmember Voracek also had questions regarding the car stacking. He felt that a one-way would also cause traffic flow 'problems and parking problems. Commissionmember Gorman asked if the stacking would block the parking. Mr. Smith replied that the parking would not be blocked and explained the distances. He reported' that the Dairy Queen building could be moved down approximately 20 feet. Mr. Smith requested a continuance to re-examine the matter. There was further discussion regarding the traffic flow. EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November, 28, 1989 Page 4 Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and continue to the December, 21, 1989 Advisory Planning Commission the conditional use permit to allow a drive-thru facility on Lot 3, Block 3, Rahncliff 2nd Addition located south of Cliff Road and West of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, as requested by Mark Austin Smith. All voted in favor. RAHNCLIFF CROSSINGS, INC. - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing for the evening regarding a planned development amendment to revise the overall pylon sign exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development located south of Cliff Road and west of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32. City Planner Jim Sturm updated the Commission on the background of the matter. He recommended two conditions as follows.: (1) the pylon sign shall be 10 feet within the property line and (2) the applicant to submit a plan for the pylon sign to the City for approval. Mark Smith (Rahncliff) explained the history. Chairman Pawlenty asked if the relocation of the sign was at the City's request. Mr. Smith explained it was by mutual agreement. Commissionmember Merkley stated he felt the relocation of the sign would be an improvement as the signs were too close together. Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a planned development amendment to revise the overall pylon sign exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development located south of Cliff Road and west of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, as requested by Rahncliff Crossings, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1,. The pylon sign shall be 10 feet within the property line. 2. The applicant shall submit a plan for the pylon sign to the City for approval. 3. The Rahncliff Plaza sign to be removed. All voted in favor. of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD VIC ELLISON EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mwor PHONE: (612),454-8100 THOMAS EGAN FAX: (612):454-8363 DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES December 4, 1989 Ory Admlnl:emor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CIN Ciera BRAD SWENSON TRI -LAND PARTNERSHIP OF EAGAN 1260 YANKEE DOODLE RD, #202 EAGAN NN 55121 Re:Tax Increment Financing Application for Proposed Ice Arena Project Dear Brad: The City would like to notify you of the results of the Economic Development Commission's initial meeting held on Tuesday, November 28 and its intentions as to proceeding with the analysis of this project. The Commission was generally favorable in its reception of an ice arena being constructed privately as a part of a commercial venture, however, would like additional information prior to any final recommendation to the City Council. This information would permit the City staff and the Commission to fully evaluate the potential of the project for the City. On behalf of the Commission I am requesting that you provide the City with an updated application with more information on the private development and less on the operational aspects of the ice arena. Specifically, the City would like definitive responses to the following points: 1. Provide a legal description of the boundaries of the proposed tax increment financing district complete with a listing of parcel identification numbers for all parcels located within the district. Define the nature of the development to occur on each parcel within the proposed tax increment financing district. This parcel description should include the following:, A. Nature of business; B. Size of proposed development (this should include a square footage and estimated market value of the proposed development.) If possible the information should be sufficient to permit the County Assessor to determine market value; C. Date of construction start up; THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOLGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer BRAD SWENSON DECEMBER 4, 1989 PAGE TWO D. Date of construction completion. 3. Information on original valuation of the district. A. For each parcel in the district we would like the following valuation information as of January 2, 1989 and January 2, 1985; 1) Assessors estimated market value, tax capacity and property classification (if possible we would like this information provided by the County Assessor in writing.) 4. Description of the compliance of this project with the 25% use restriction for economic development districts in the metropolitan area. This specific compliance requirement should be on a parcel specific basis; 5. Describe the specific nature of the tax increment financing. assistance requested; 6. Describe the ownership of the ice arena, i.e., private or public; 7. Describe the requested method of tax increment financial assistance, i.e., bond issuance or pay as you go; 8. Define the developers position on the fiscal disparities option; 9. Specifically detail the contractual language whereby the City will be held harmless for any future financial participation either for debt service or operational deficiencies with a declaration of guarantees for default under the contract. The Economic Development Commission is requesting this information be provided where appropriate on the City's application form and where not appropriate on supplemental appendix chapters to the application. As soon as the City receives this information it will perform its own analysis of the tax increment financing potential and application to the situation. The City is unclear on the developer's intention as to the status of the bank/medical office building. It would be helpful if this clarification is added to clarify the status of the facility and its relationship to the proposed TIF district. The City is interested in promptly moving ahead with this project in an efficient, reasonable manner. Because of the changes initiated by the developer's representatives at the Commission meeting, it is not feasible to follow the current schedule for the BRAD SWENSON DECEMBER 5, 1989 PAGE THREE TIF public hearing to be held mid-January. This schedule would require the completion of the TIF plan within the next two weeks. The City is of the opinion that from both developer's and the City's perspectives this time table would not permit a responsible evaluation of the project. The City would like to initiate a new calendar. This calendar would begin with the submission of the amended application to the City no later than December 12. The Economic Development Commission has scheduled a special meeting for December 19 to review the amended application and the analysis of the City staff and consultants. After that meeting a complete calendar can be determined. Based on the developer's statements as to the construction schedule, this new calendar should still ensure completion of the TIF process well in advance of any actual construction. I would assume that you will ask Publicorp to compile much of this information given their expertise and experience with working with tax increment financing applications. If any of your consultants or yourself have questions regarding this request on the process, please contact the Director of Finance, Gene VanOverbeke, the City's fiscal consultant, Dave MacGillivray, or this office at any time so the City can continue to move ahead with its analysis of the project. Sincerely, Thomas U� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Members of the Economic Development Commission Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Dale Runkle, Director of Community Development Dave MacGillivray, City's Fiscal Consultant/Springsted Jim Sheldon, City Attorney Steve Rosholt, City's Bond Counsel, Faegre and Benson TLH/jeh Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St, Paul, Minnesota 55101 November 22, 1989 612222-8423 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges rypV City Administrator ray. City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Re: Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Upgrade Dear Mr. Hedges: The MWCC is in receipt of your letter of October 17, 1989 informing us of the Eagan City Council's recommendation of October 3, 1989. The MWCC has committed $48 million to the Seneca Plant expansion and upgrade, the primary purpose of which is to meet increasing demands for sewer service by the communities served by the plant including Eagan. The upgrade is intended to benefit all of the citizens of Eagan and adjacent communities by solving odor problems at the plant and meeting stricter air and water quality standards. Over the last year and a half the MWCC has made every effort to accommodate the Eagan City Council's conditions for expansion and upgrade of the plant. We intend to continue our full compliance with the Development Agreement, Development Contract and Escrow Agreement. As you well know, however, a public agency is not authorized to make payments to residents in the vicinity of public works projects for stress or hardship during construction or operation of the public facility. The Commission's Engineering and Construction staff always tries to work as closely as possible with residents near our projects to alleviate disruption during construction. We will certainly do so with the residents of the Wuthering Heights neighborhood during the plant expansion. However, the Commission cannot agree to the City Council's recommendation to pay $5,000 to each resident of the Wuthering Heights neighborhood. Sincerely, Helen Boyer v Deputy Chief Administrator HAB:JKM:cac L-HAB14 cc: Lurline Baker -Kent Ed DeLaForest Douglas Warner Pauline Langsdorf Commissioners Margaret Shreiner/Metropolitan Council Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer \C\:A _010PT SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1989 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OY AGENDA H. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY 0 III. PROPOSED 1990 PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND IV. PROPOSED 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION/LABOR NEGOTIATIONS VII. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING At the December 5 regular City Council meeting, a special City Council meeting was set for Tuesday, December 12 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss the Multi -Family Residential Land Study and finalize the 1990 Operating Budget for both Public Enterprise and General Fund expenditures. In addition, the City Council will adjourn, in executive session to provide direction regarding labor negotiations and provide direction regarding health insurance and personnel increases for 1990. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY At the City Council meeting this past Tuesday, December 5, an updated report entitled "Multi -Family Residential Land Study" was distributed to each member of the City Council for your review. This report summarizes certain study areas thatwere directed by the City Council for additional review. Those areas identified in the special study were areas c, n, v and w. The Director of Community Development is planning to review each of .the study areas and following the special City Council meeting on Tuesday, meetings with the owners of the parcels, identified on page 9 will be scheduled. John Voss of Urban Planning and Design will' assist Community Development with that process. If any member of the City Council has misplaced the updated report or the original report, please feel free to contact this office and a copy will be sent out to you. PROPOSED 1990 PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND The Public Enterprise Fund, which includes the water and sanitary sewer utilities and streetlighting, has been completed and is ready for City Council consideration. For a copy of the Public Enterprise Fund Bud et, refer to a memo and the budget worksheets enclosed and referenced as pages through gIZ 1990 GENERAL. FUND BUDGET The City Administrator and Director of Parks and Recreation are planning to present data for increasing user fees for recreational programs and information pertaining to the total operating cost of various park services. The City Administrator will also review the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund, so a determination could be made as to how much equipment should be purchased during 1990. The City Administrator will have input regarding what equipment, if any, could be further maintained and not replaced during 1990 and further, if any equipment can be delayed for future acquisition. Enclosed as pages � through is a reprint of the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund information that appeared in the October 6, 1989 budget memo. OTHER .BUSINESS There is no additional business anticipated at this time. EXECUTIVE SESSION Action would be in order to approve an executive session for the purpose of discussing wages and benefits pertaining to collective and non-collective.bargaining groups. Following the adjournment of the special City Council meeting, the Council can retreat to the City Administrator's office. Items to be discussed in executive session include a response to both Police Association and clerical ,unit regarding their most recent counter -proposals. Also, the City Administrator would like direction on a wage increase, health insurance and the use of a flexible spending plan for all employee groups. There will be handouts available at the meeting on Tuesday for each of these items. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator R MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1989 SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1990 PUBLIC The following is the proposed consisting of both expenditures and streetlighting enterprise addressed separately beginning WATER ENTERPRISE FUND FUND BUDGET 1990 public enterprisefundbudget and revenues for the water, sewer funds. Each utility fund is with the water utility. The Director of Public Works is proposing a full-time maintenance employee in the Water Department to assist with the increase in infrastructure, deep wells, new reservoirs and other utility system responsibilities,. The amounts budgeted for Parts and Supplies are consistent as proposed for 1990 with budget 1989 with two (2) exceptions., Those exceptions are chemicals and chemical products, an increase of $41,000 to $5.0,000. The chemicals and chemical products include KMN04, fluoride and chlorine to treat approximately 3,,000,000,000 gallons of water. The other expense is "in the amount of $22,500, an increase from $7,000 in 1989 to provide landscaping for .two (2) additional well houses and sod repair damaged property. The category "Services and Other Charges" includes a number of operating expenses including, audit services, telephone service, gopher one call service and several 'other general operating expenses. The major expense in this category is for electricity to operate the wells and booster stations. Due to the increase in those facilities, the budget is proposed, at $357,000, a change from the 1989 appropriation of $299,000. The water main repairs also increased to include a contingency for water main repairs and the inspection of Wells 42 and #6y which is estimated at $3.0,000 of the total $52,00'0 proposed expenditure. Also included is the City's principal and interest payment for the water treatment plant. There are several considerations under Capital Outlay and several are paid 50% by water revenues and 50% sewer revenues Those items that show a total cost figure with an asterisk represent 501 of the total cost with the remainder being paid for by the sewer utility. The Capital items are listed as follows: Acquisition of Blue Cross, land $ 62,500* Fencing of land acquisition 10,000* Parking lot and aisle improvements 7,500* Garage expansion debt 39,500 Office expansion remodeling 105,000 (This represents 25% of the total Public Works garage remodeling) Gas detector 1,500 Utility locators 750* Air knife 1,800 One-half ton pick-up truck radio & equipment 1,400 3/4 ton PU truck utility, body, radio-& equipment 17,500 *Those amountsfollowed with an asterisk indicate 50% of the total cost for the referenced capital item. The remaining 50% will be funded through the sewer utility. Also included in the Water Department is an appropriation for a transfer to the General. Fund to offset certain personnel costs in Public Works Engineering as well as other expenses paid for by the General Fund. SEWER UTILITY There are two (2) personnel considerations for the Sewer Utility Department. Thereasons are similar to the water utility operation. The Director of Public Works is asking that consideration be given to the addition of a full-time employee in the Sewer Department to further assist in the sanitary and storm sewer maintenance program, provide assistance with the expanded sewer maintenance, operations, ongoing hydrant and gate valve maintenance and other maintenance requirements. There is also a request in the budget to expand the temporary/seasonal personnel from six (6) to seven (7) to assist with both the sanitary and storm sewer maintenance program. Parts and, Supplies for the sewer utility show little increase from 1989. Most of these accounts are for cleaning supplies,, clothing and personal equipment, ,small repairs,, building repairs, motor fuels, tires.,landscape material with the highest cost being for utility system.parts and supplies at $8,000,. Included in Services and Other Charges are a broad number of expenses, including electricity for the lift station, utility system repair in the amount of $19,500, public utility administration in the amount of $91,000 and each year the MWCC disposal charge continues to increase and is proposed at $2,254,000 for 1990. This is an increase from.$Q,902,000 in 1989. The Capital Outlay for the sewer utility includes the following,: Acquisition of 5 acres from Blue Cross $ 62,500* Fencing of land acquisition 10,000* Parking lot and aisle improvements 7,500* Office expansion remodeling 105,000 (represents 25% of total remodeling cost) Garage expansion debt 39,500 Rubber suction hose 1,500 Discharge hose Gas detector Utility locators 5/8 ton PU truck 1,800 1,500 750* 12,000 *Those amounts followed with an asterisk indicate 50% of the total cost for the referenced capital item. The remaining 50% will be funded through the sewer utility. In summary, the Sewer Utility reflects very few changes in proposed operations. With the additional emphasis on controlling the environment by better managing maintenance of storm water holding ponds along with expanding sanitary sewer services, additional personnel is requested. Items proposed under Capital have been discussed by the City Council in earlier budget considerations, such as land acquisition from Blue Cross, the expansion of the administrative offices of the Public Works garage facility and other related improvements. STREETLIGHTING UTILITY The expenditure proposed for streetlighting is increasing each year proportionate to the number of new streetlights that are installed and billed to benefitting'property owners. The rates are set at a level which. is expected to cover the energy cost and they are reviewed on a regular basis. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET The Public Enterprise Fund Budget consisting of. water, sewer and streetlighting utilities is a revenue -based budget with no reliance on property tax. The proposed budget reflects present operations, taking into consideration the growth of our public. utility system. With additional personnel in the sewer division, there is an emphasis in proper maintenance of the storm water system. The total proposed budget for the water utility is $2,39,2,846,, the sewer utility is $2,908,028,, and streetlighting is $67,060 as proposed for 1990. Therefore, the total Public Enterprise Fund operating Budget presented for 1990 is $5,367,.874„ an increase of $636,434 over the 1989 budget of $4,731,440. C116 40 k_Ls City Admin rator TLE/vmd PUBLIC UTILITIES - COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES OPERATING REVENUES: 61 WATER Service Charges. Connection Permits Penalties Sale of Materials 6 Meter Charges Other TOTAL 62 SEWER Service Charges Connection Permits Penalties Other TOTAL 63 STREETLIGHTING Service Charges TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 1987 1988 1989 1990 ----------------------------------------------------- $1,767,715 $2,107,459 $1,900,,000 $2,020,000 $9,580 $8,375 $14,300 $6,500 $17,698 $26,413 $24,000 $24,000 $97,388 $84,723 $165,000 $150,000 $18,053 $23,774 $14,200 $18,200 ----------------------------------------------------- $1,910,434 ----------------------------------------------------- $2,250,744 $2,117,500 $2,218,900 $1,980,176 $9,682 $26,240 $3,871 ------------ $2,01'9,969 -------------- $2,193,,197 $_2,050,000 $2,650,000 $8,950 $14„300 $26,000 $26,,297 $24,000 $24,000 $728 $400 $300 $2„229,172 $2,088,700 $2,682,800 ------------------------------------- $54,673 $61,095 $63,220 $67,000 ----------------- $54,673 ------------------------------ $61,095 $63,;220 $67,000 $3,985,076 $4,541,011 $4:,,269,,420 $4,,968,700 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES (CONTINUED) ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 1987 1988 1989 11990 ----------------------------------------------------- NON-OPERATING REVENUES: Special Assessments Interest Interest on Investments Interest on Current Value & Debt Service Credit Connection Charges Connection Charge Water Treatment Plant TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES GRAND TOTAL REVENUES DEDICATED REVENUES - NOT AVAILABLE FOR OPERATIONS ------------------------- Supply & Storage Connection Charges Water Treatment Plant Billing Debt Service Surcharge Connection Charges Water System Renewal and Replacement Sewer System Renewal & Replacement Interest Earnings: Water Treatment Plant Water System Renewal and Replacement Sewer System Renewal and Replacement Supply and Storage Municipal Garage Expansion $11,306 $13,278 $12„900 $40,000 $733,417 $935,529 $680,000 $900,000 $28,321 $26,386 $26,000 $22,000 $660,613 $857,215 $550,000 $377,000 $285,420 ---------------------------------------------------- $284,914 $250,000 $148,200 $1,719,077 $2,117,322 $1,518,900 $1,487,200 $5,704,153 $6,658,333 $5,788,;320 $6„455,900 $660,613 $403„432 $285,420 $857,215 $44'4,200 $284,914 $550,000 $400,000 $250,000 $141,239 $164,001 $160,000 $101,.980 $109,736 $115,000 $235,360 $283,155 $300,000 $71,910 $79,525 $153,089 $90,303 $101,805 $178,512 $95,000 $105,000 $150,000 $377,000 $430,000 $148,200 $150,000 $110,000 $210„000 $100,000 $110,000 $150,000 $79,400 $79,400 $79,400 $79,400 ------------------------------------------ $2,211,968 $2,593,241 $2,204,400 $1,864,600 W 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 Salaries 8 Wages - Regular 140,291 156,299 262,620 41,277 9. 306,976 1 306,976 1 4111 Accrued Leave Time 24,636 27,263 0 7,111 I 0 I 0 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4112 Overtime - Regular 5,784 9,093. 22;670 4,948 1 18,844 1 18,844 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4130 Salaries 8 Wages - Temp 3,325 9,708 8,640 1,120 1 9,360 I 9,360 1 4140 Accrued Retirement Benefits 21,413 24,009 34;570 6,572 1 40,655 1 40,655 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4150 Accrued Insurance Benefits ,28,250 30,474 33,970 8,179 I 51,171 I 51,171 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •••• Total Personal Services 223,699 256,846 362,470 69,207 1 427,006 I 427,006 I PARTS 8 SUPPLIES ________________ 4210 Office Supplies 478 51 300 0 1 300 1. 200 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4211 Office Printed Material/Forms 732 294 550 0 1 550 1 400 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4215 Reference Materials 0 0 100 0 1' 100 f 100 1 4220 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Operating Supplies - General 499 1,978 1,000 155 1 1,200 1 1,200 4 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures.by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECO14MD 4221 Film/A-V Tapes 0 20 0 15 1 0 1 0 1 4222 Medical/Rescue/Safety 0 186 -200 0 1, 400 1 200 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4223 Bldg Operations/Cleaning Supp 726 443 .400 0 I 400 1 450 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4224 'Clothing:& Personal Equip 1,281 1,345 1,,670 304 1 1,910 1, 1,900 1 - 4230 Repair & Mtn Supplies -General 21,178 1,607 2,000 502 1 2,500 f 2,500 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4231 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile Equipment Repair Parts 4,272 4,115 6,000 132 1 6,000 1 5,500 1, - 4232 Small Equip Repair Parts 0 57 0 0. 1 0 1 0 I 4233 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Building Repair Supplies 222 477 800 0' 1 800 1 800 1 4235 Motor Fuels 5,062 5,10319,000, 1,498 1 9,400 1 8,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4236 Lubri cants and Additives. 2,417 1,273 2,700 .. _ 138 _ I 2;700 1 2,300 1 4237 Tires 1,015 627 800 0 1 800' I 800 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4238 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Communication System Parts 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4239 Equipmt Operation Replcmt Part 0 83 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4240 Small Tools 878 1,014 1,200 723 1 • 1,600 1 1,300 1 4241 Shop Materials 616 44 400 18 1 400 1 400 1 SERVICES 8 OTHER CHARGES ------------------ 4310 90DEPT61 - Enterprise Fund 13,000 0 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4312 Engineering Services 13,042 Detailed. Breakdown. of Expenditures by Account ,10,000 5,583 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 4314 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Auditing Services - 1990 Budget 3,750 0 1 3;950 1 3,950 1 4315 Prof Serv-Financial Non -Audit 0 139 0 0 1 0 1 0 l 1990 1990 0 61 NATER 4,000 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ______ ACTUAL ______ APPROP ______ 03-31-89 _________ REQUEST _______ RECOMMD _______ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4243 Heating Oil/Propane/Fuels 0 33 0 11 1 0 1 0 1 4244 Chemicals 8 Chemical Products 26;591 27,938 41,000 3,082 1 55,000 1 50,000 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------`-------------------- 4250 Landscape Material &Supplies 255 403 7,000 0 1 22,500 1 22,500 1 ----------------------------------------- 4255 Street Repair Supplies ______________________________________________________________________________________ 1;876 1,808 .2,000 0 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 \ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4257 Signs 8 Striping Material 513 589 600 48 1 600 1 600 1 4260 Utility System Parts/Supplies 0 26;069 40,000 12,796 1 34,750 1 34,750 1 ---------------------------------------- '•'• ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'Total Parts 8 Supplies ______________________________________________________________________________________ 66,611 75,560 117,720 19,422 1 143,910 1 135,900 I SERVICES 8 OTHER CHARGES ------------------ 4310 Prof Services - General 1,940 79 13,000 0 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4312 Engineering Services 13,042 3,954 ,10,000 5,583 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 4314 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Auditing Services 3,300 3,500 3,750 0 1 3;950 1 3,950 1 4315 Prof Serv-Financial Non -Audit 0 139 0 0 1 0 1 0 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4323 Testing Services -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 4,001 4,000 880 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 a 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 - 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADNN --------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMO - 4330 ----------------------`-----------•--------------------------------------------------------------------`---------------------- Postage - 4,093 4,817 7,500 1,311 1 7,500 1 7,500 1 4331 ---------------- Telephone Service r--------------------------------- 2,474 403 500 109 1 500 1 :------------------------- 500 1 4332 Telephone Equip Charges -................................................. 0 762 700 0 1 700 1 700 1 ...............................................................................................•------------------------------ 4335 Pager Service Fees 0 158 - 150 55 1 270 I 270 1 .............................................................................................................................. 4336, Telephone Circuit Charges 2,339 2,320 3,000 653 1 3,500 1 3,500 1 \........... 4339 ........................................ One -Call Service Fees _----------- 0 .-------------- 1,758 ----------------`-------------------------------- 0 1,101 110,000 1 10,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4342 Legal Notice Pulication 0 1138 0 161 1 0 1 0 1 .............................................................................................................................. 4350 General Printing 8 Binding 0 '2,017 1,000 0 1 1,000 1 1,000 I 4360 Insurance 29,667 26,440 30,570 3,696 I 34,970 1 34,970 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------...--------- 4371 Electricity 9,989 0 0 0 1 0 1 -0 1 4375 Electricity-Well/Boaster St 246,086 303,598 299,000 33,089 1 357,000 1 357,000 I 4376 Natural Gas Service 26,520 19,472 25,000 7,173 I 27,000 1 27,000 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------_-....---------------------------------------- 4381 Mobile Equipment Repair 684 834 - 1,000 36 I 1.,000 1 1;000 1 4382 . Small Equipment Repair 90;917 95 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4383 Buildings Repair 10,644 4,952 .2,000 0 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise 'Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN --:----- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03=31-89 REQUEST RECO14ND ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4385 Streets Repair 2,436 6,024 6,000 0 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 -------------------------------- 4386 __________________________________________ Conmun ication System Repair 251 311 __ 660 ___ .. 45 1 600 _ 1 600 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4390 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________----- Utility System Repair 0 54,011 32,000 14,650 1 52,000 1 52,000 1 4397 Machinery & Equipment Rental 1,628 1,370 1,500 0 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 --------------------- ----------------------------=---`--------------.--._..---------------------------------------"....-..--- Q l� 4410 / v Miscellaneous 684 68 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4411 Conferences & Schools 1,586 1,875 2,600 963 1 3,150 1 3,150 1 _____________________________________________-_____-______.-.__---_______--__-_____-__-________________-____--------.-.___---__-___ 4413 Tuition Reimbursement _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 0 251 600 0 1 600 1 600 1 --------------------------------- 4414 Dues & Subscriptions 895 1,064 300 122 I :300 I 300 1 4415 ._ _. Licenses/Permits/Taxes 524 611 800 - - 500 1 - - 800 - - 1 800 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________-_-----_______________-.______________ 4426. 'Interest .484,194 473,569 454;850 0 1 442,100 1 442,100 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 4427 Paying Agent Fees 417 '411 0 0 1 0 _ 1 0 1 4440 Pub Util Adim 0 165,200 173;450 43,364 1 182-,000 1 182,000 1 ______________________________________________________________________________....--___-________________-__._.__---.......----_ 4441 Pub Util--Cent Sery Maint 0 50,000 65,400 16,350 I 70,700 1 70,700 1 ----------- 4450 _------------------- _---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Contractual Service 27 0 0 0 1 0 . 1 0 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of -Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT _ CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ______ ACTUAL ______ APPROP ______ 03-31-89 _________ REQUEST _______ RECOMND ....... 4454 Solid Waste Removal 659 0 200 0 1 200 1 200 1 4459 Courier/Delivery--Service• 0. 296 350 0 I 350 1 350 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4470 Maintenance Contracts 0 '------------------------------------------------------------------ 2,783 1,500 330 L 1,500 1 1,500 1 _-_---`-_-` •... ................................... Total Services 8 Other Chrgs 935,196 1,137,281 1,141,320 130,171 1 1,230,190 1 1,230,190 I w CAPITAL OUTLAY -------------- 4510 Land 8 Land Improvements 0 0 62,500 0 1 80,000 I 80,000 1 4520 Buildings 0 0 84,700 0 1 144,500 1 144,500 1 ----------------------------'_--__-_.--______--__---_--_______--_----__----.-----_--_------___-------------------------------- . 4530 Other Improvements 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 0 4531 Spec Assess on City Property 4;868 4,652 0 0 10 1 0 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________--..-...--_-__ 4540 Machinery 8 Equipment 0 0 60,000 0 1 0 1 0 1 .............................................................................................................................. 4560. Office Furnishing 8 Equip 0 0 0 0 1 0 1' 0 1 4570 Other Equipment 0. 0 750 584 1, 4,050 f' 4,050 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'---"_-------'_._-..._.__...._ 4580 Mobile. Equipment 0 0 12,000 0 d, 31,500 1 31,500 1 ----------------------------------- .... ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Capital Outlay 4,868 4,652 219,950 5a4. •T 260,050 1 260,050 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget, 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOFIMD ------ ------ ------......... ------- ''----- TRANSFERS 4710 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4610 Project Contract 0 64,889 1 1 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4613 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project. -Outside Engineer 0 19,659 1 1 196,700 4616 Project -Legal 0 440 1 1 39,700 1 4618 Project -Other 0 950 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- •••' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Construction Projec 0 85,938 1 I TRANSFERS 4710 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transfer Out 196,700 39,700 0 0 1 39,700 1 39,700 1 •••' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Transfer 196,700 39,700 0 0 I 39,700 1 39,700 1 OTHER 2310 Bond Payment (Principal-) 0 0 150,000 0 1 150,000 1 150,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4840 Merchandise for Resale 0 0 144,000 38,870 1 1 150,000 1 150,000 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN ------=- ACTUAL ------ .ACTUAL ------ APPROP ------ 03-31-89 --------- REQUEST ------- RECOMMD ....... •••• Total Other, 0 0 294,000 38,870 1 300,006 1 300,000 1 TOTAL AMOUNT THIS DIVISION 1,429,074 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1,514,039 2,135,460 344,192 1 2,400,856 1 2,392,846 I 90DEPT62 Enterprise Furl Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget PERSONAL SERVICES ._________________ 4110 Salaries &,Wages - Regular 44,224 73,868' 1990 1990 62 SEWER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T=D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31=89 REQUEST RELOMND PERSONAL SERVICES ._________________ 4110 Salaries &,Wages - Regular 44,224 73,868' 90,560 18,117 I 103,172 1 103,172 1 41.11 Accrued Leave Time 7,954 13,078 0 3,113 1 0 1 0 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4112 Overtime - Regular 1,030 863 5,670 441 I 4,711 I 4,711 I 4130 Salaries 8 Wages - Temp- 4,596 - - 5,993 8,640 -343 - I - 12,500 1 12,500 I (\ 4140 Accrued Retiren�enY�Benef its 6,818 14,087 12,330 2,664 1 14--,6,0,1,-,l 14,601 1 __________________________________________________________________________________-_____________________________________________ 4150 Accrued I nsurance Benefits 8,86& 15,395 16,260 3,774 I 15,634 I 15,634 1_ ------------------------------------ _---------------------------------------------------------------- Total Total Personal Services 73,490 120,284 133,460- 28,452 ______ _ _-------------------------- I 150,618 1 150,618 1 PARTS 8 SUPPLIES ________________ 4210 Office Supplies 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 _________________________________________________________________:______--___-----__-________________________________-__________ 4220 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. Operating Supplies,- General 18 996 400 107 I 400 I 400 1 4222 Medical/Rescue/Safety Supplies 0 26 100 0 1 350 1 350 I. 4223 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bldg Operations/Cleaning Supp 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 1 90DEPT62 Enterprise Furl Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 - 62 SEVER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD 4224 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Clothing 8 Personal Equipment 582 608 :850 230 1 1,070 1 1,070 1 4230 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Repair B,Mtn Supplies -General 9,214 288 1,000 394 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 4231 Mobile,Equipment Repair Parts 3,653 1,134 2,000 104 1 .2,000 1 2,000 1 4232 Small Equip Repair Parts 0 127 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4233 Building Repair Parts. 0 107 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ V 4235 Motor Fuels 3,488 4,848 4,500 1,043 1 5,300 1 5,300 1 4236 Lubricants and Additives 170 70 250 13 1 250 1 250 1 -------------------------_-___----__------___________________________________._._____.______-----______________________________ 4237 Tires 458 316 800 0 1 800 1 800 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4239 Equip Oper Replacement Parts 0 1,577 2,500 0 1 2,500 1 .2,500 1 4240 Small Tools 383 281 1,000 164 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4241 Shop Materials 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4244 Chemicals 8 Chemical Products- m _ _ 0 0 250 0 1 '250 1 250 1 4250 Landscape Material 0 73 200 0 1 200 1 200 1 ----------•---------------- 4255 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------___-----___._.____, Street Repair Supplies 580 888 2,000 0 I 2,000 1 2,000 1 4257 Signs 8 Striping Material 472 196 '700 0 1 700 1 700 1 E 90DEPT62 Enterprise Furl Detai.led Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1996 Budget 1990 1990 62 SEWER. 1987 1988 .1989 Y -T -.D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4260 Utility System Parts/Supplies 0 7,055. 6,000 668 1. 8,000 1 8,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •�•� Total Parts 8 Supplies 19,024 18,790 22,550 2,723 1 25,820 I 25,820 I SERVICES B OTHER CHARGES ------------------------ 7,606 7,000 7,000 4310 .Prof Services - General 0 7,000 0 1 1 I --------------------------------------------------------------•---------------_----------------------------------------------- 4312 Engineering Services 0 0 1,500 3,357 1 1,500 1 1,500 I ----------------------------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------------------------- 4314 Auditing Services 3,300 3,500 3,750 0 1 3,950 1 -3,950 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4315 Prof Serv-Financial Non -Audit 0 139 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4330 Postage 4,093 4,817 6,000 1,311 I 6,500 1 6,000 1� ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4332 Telephone Equip/Installation 0 1,142 0, 0 I 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4335 Pager Service Fees 0 123 150 58 I 350 I 350 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4336 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Circuit Charges 617 994 850 290 I 850 1 850 I 4360 Insurance 5,395 6,314 5,730 468 1 7,590 I 7,590 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4374 Electricity -Lift Station 5,902 7,416 8,500 2,899 1 8,500 1 8,500 1 90DEPT62 _ Enterprise Fund Detailed. Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 62 SEWER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D 'DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ...... ACTUAL ------ APPROP ------ 03-31-89 ....... REQUEST ------- RECDMMD ------- 4381 Mobile Equipment Repair 349 565 600 1,075 1 11500 1 11500 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4382 SmalL Equipment Repair 28,568 333 '500 0 1. 500 1 500 I. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4383 Buildings Repair 0 0. 0 0 l 0 1 0 1 4385 Streets Repair 2,786 4,134 :3,000 0 1' 3,000 1 - 3,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. 4386 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------z--------------------- Communication System Repair .250 0 400 0 1 400 I 400 1 4390 Utility System Repair 0 14,843 18,500 465 1 19,500 1 19,500 1 4397 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-- Machinery 8 Equipment Rental _197 357' 2,500 0 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 4410 Miscellaneous 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4411 Conferences 8'Schools 150 633 1,000 360 I, 1,000 1 1.,000 4413 Tuition Reimbursement 0 413 500 0 1 500 1 500 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4414 Dues B Subscriptions 21 0 50 _ 0 1 50 1 50 1 ------------------------------------------- 4415 Licenses/Permits/Taxes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 106 150 0 _ I 150 1 150 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------`-------------------------`-------------.-------------- 4417 Awards/Judgements/Losses 0 2,101 0 0 1 0 1 0. 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4426 Interest 5,112 0 0 0 1 0 1 0. I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4440 Public Util Admin 0 82,600 86,700 21,675 1 91,000 1 91,000 1 906EPT62 Lard 6 Land Improvements Enterprise.Fund 0 62,500 0 .1 80,060 1 80,000 1 Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account Buildings 0 0 84,700 0 1990 Budget 144,500 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4570 --------------------------•-------------------------------------' Other Equipment 0 0 750 "'-' 584 P 5,550 1 '5,550 1 1990 1990 62 SEWER 0 1987 1988 1969 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- 0 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4441 Public Util-Central ServMaint 0 25,000 32,720 .8,186 l 35,300 I 35,300 I 4454 Solid Waste Removal 0 68 200 0 1 200 I 200 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4456 Tree Removal 0 3,472 4,500. 0 1 4,500 4 4,500 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. 4475 MWCC Disposal Charges 1,461,743 1,646,542 1,902,000 475,445 I: 2,254,000 1. 2,254,000 1' *'•• ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Services 6 Other Chrgs 1,526,117 1,805,612 2,086,800 515,589 1 2,456,340 1 4,449;840 I CAPITAL OUTLAY -------------- 4510 Lard 6 Land Improvements 0 0 62,500 0 .1 80,060 1 80,000 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4520 Buildings 0 0 84,700 0 1 144,500 1 144,500 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4570 --------------------------•-------------------------------------' Other Equipment 0 0 750 "'-' 584 P 5,550 1 '5,550 1 4580 Mobile Equipment 0 0 142,000 0 ._ 1 12,000 1 12,000 I •••• ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Capital Outlay 0 0 289,950 584 1 242,050 I 242,050 1 TRANSFERS' 90DEPT62 62 SEWER . Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1996 Budget 4710 Transfer Out -------------------------------------- Total Transfer -------------------------------------- TOTAL AMOUNT THIS -DIVISION 1,737,331, 1,984,386 2,532;760 547,348 1 2,908,528 1 2,908,028 1 __________________________________________________ 1990 1990 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADNN ACTUAL ------ ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 ------ ------------- REQUEST ....... RECOMMD ------- 118,700 39,700 0 0 1 '39,700 1 39,700 1 ..............•---------------.--...--.---------------------------•-------------- 118,700 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39,700 0 0 1 39,700 1 39,700 1 TOTAL AMOUNT THIS -DIVISION 1,737,331, 1,984,386 2,532;760 547,348 1 2,908,528 1 2,908,028 1 __________________________________________________ m 90DEPT63 .Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 63 STREET LIGHTING 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D .DEPT CITY ADMN ------------------ ACTUAL .ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES --------------------'--- 4372 Electricity - Street Lights 47,873 60,520 63,220 .11,587 1 67;000 1 67,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •••• Total Services & Other Chrgs 47,873 60,520 63,220 11,587 1 67,000 1 67,000 I TOTAL AMOUNT THIS DIVISION 47,873 60,520 63,220 11,587 1 67,000 1 67,000 1 CAPITAL Department budget adjustments were made to remove the following capital items from operations to the equipment revolving fund: Community Development Vehicle/Topper/Telephone $ 14,150 Police Department Mobile Digital Terminals 138,000 Parks and Recreation 3/4 Ton 4X4 Pickup 16,000 Groundsmaster 11,500 Passenger Van 20.000 $199,650 The Fire Department is also requesting consideration of a $68,000 appropriation for an air/salvage vehicle. In the 1989 budget there was an appropriation of $30,000 with the accident involving the aerial truck a complete upgrade to that unit while. it is undergoing repairs seems more appropriate. That upgrade is expected to cost approximately $63,000 and therefore exhausts the two above- mentioned appropriations. The Fire Chief asked that the air/salvage vehicle then be given consideration from the Equipment Revolving Fund. He is aware that not all desired not all desired equipment can be purchased and that it might be necessary to consider this acquisition at a later date. Total proposed expenditures from the equipment revolving fund by department are as follows.: Community Development Vehicle/Topper/Phone $ 14,150 Police Investigative Car 13,000 Investigator Surveilance Van 17,000 Administrative Car 13,000 Unmarked Traffic Car 17,000 Mobile Digital Terminals 138,000 Fire Air/Salvage Vehicle 65,,000 Refurbish Unit #6 (Changed to Aerial Truck Upgrade) 36,000 Streets Loader with Plow & Wing 140,000 34 GVW Single Axle with Plow Wing, Underbody &Sander 75,000 Parks and Recreation (All Replacement) 3/4 Ton 4X4 Pickup 16,000 Groundsmaster 11,500 Passenger Van 20,000 One -Ton Truck 30,000 Tractor 44,000 Tree conservation One Ton Truck 23.000 $672,650 This proposed expenditure of $672,650 from the Equipment Revolving Fund exceeds the amount available of $384,520 by $288,13,0. It would be the recommendation of the City Administrator that an increase to the equipment certificate portion of the Equipment Revolving Fund be considered over the original amount .of $200,000. Because of the large increase in total tax capacity (assessed value) there would be little impact on the taxpayer relative to 1989 rates. A more precise impact will be determined when complete information is made available to the City. As you recall there was a great deal of discussion about the potential of this happening when the concept of this new fund was put in place with the 1989 budget. As we have seen so frequently, the State has again changed the rules with the levy limitations and the ground rules are substantially different than they were last year. If levy limits continue and especially if they become more restrictive, the only choice in purchasing equipment will be to finance it through the use of equipment certificates if on-going operations are going to be maintained at current levels. The following table illustrates this impact. General General 1989 Total BUDGET General Fund Equipment Eqmt Revolving Fund Fund General Capital As Revolving As a % Of Operations Cavital Fund A t of Total Fund Total/Gen Fund $9,787,510 $708,270 $10,495,780 6.74 $400,000 3.84 '1990 (10-10-899 BUDGET General General Total General Fund Equipment Eqmt Revolving Fund Fund General Capital As Revolving As a % Of Operations Capital Fund A I of Total Fund Total/Gen Fund $10,379,650 $387,480 $10,767,130 3.64 $672,650 6.24 Per Cent Change from 1989 to 1990 Increase (Decrease) General General Total General Fund Equipment Eqmt Revolving Fund Fund General Capital As Revolving As_a i Of Operations Capital Fund A % of Total Fund Total/Gen Fund 68 (45.34) 2.64 (46.38) 68.24 63.24 ?Z/ You will note that an increase in General Fund operations of approximately 6.0% from $9,787,510 to $10,379,650 requires a significant reduction in the amount of capital that can be financed through the General Fund. In the 6.0% increase of $592,140 in operations there is included $537,920 of personal services which includes only one (1) new employee and 10 additional hours for an existing clerical position. Personal services is 69.5% of the general operation for the 1989 budget and 70.5% of the general operations for the 10-10-89 proposed budget. It seems that the question becomes one of buying the equipment with equipment certificates or not buying it at all. There is very little opportunity to put it back into the General Fund without seriously impacting the current level of services. AGENDA IIAR MEETING ALAN CITY COUNCIL EAGAN, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING DECEMBER 5, 1989 6:30 P.M. I. 6:30 - ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE (BLUE) II. 6:35 - ADOPT AGENDA & APPROVAL OF MINUTES (BLUE) III. 6:45 - DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS (BLUE) A. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. I -NET Services to Fire Stations #4 and #5. B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P, 2 1. Review County's Proposed 5 Year Capital Improvement Program C. POLICE DEPARTMENT 1. Mission Statement IV. 6:55 - CONSENT AGENDA (PINK) P P A. PERSONNEL ITEMS 1ZB. LICENSE, Amusement Devices for Pockets/Summit Amusement, 2020 Silver Bell Rd �,3C. RESOLUTIONS Requesting MnDOT Speed Limt Study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff to Diffley) �S D. AMENDMENT to Development Contract, Hills of Stonebridge II E. ACCEPT Donated Property from West Publishing F. APPLICATION for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis/Dennis Ellingson, Program Administrator .2( G. FINAL PLAT, Town Centre 100 Fifth Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) 23_H. FINAL PLAT, George W. Giles Addition ZqI. CONTRACT 88-10, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Eagandale / Center Industrial Park 9th and 10th Additions) y 7J. CONTRACT 88-30, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (South Oaks Streets and Utilities). (, �-�KCONTRACT 88 -KK, Acknowledgement of Completion (Community of Joy Church) ( �L.. CONTRACT 85-R, Acknowledgement of Completion (UPS - Utilities) ys M. CONTRACT 88-32, Acknowledgement of Completion/Final Payment (Well #12, Pumphouse & Facilities) ZS, N. VACATE Sewer Easement, Receive Request/Schedule Public Hearing (Thomas Lake and 1 Diffley Road) ,QQ V. 7:00 - PUBLIC HEARINGS (SALMON) A. VACATE Portion of Westerly Right -of -Way (Lexington Way) J— B. VACATE Portion of T.H. 13 (Neil Heine) 3? -C. VACATE Portion of Cedarvale Boulevard (Cedarvale Shopping Center) 34 D. PROJECT 574, Eagandale Center Industrial (Streetlights) �E. PROJECT 583, Park Center (Streets and Utilities) q0F. PROJECT 578, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Storm Sewer) 8:00 - PUBLIC HEARING* 10\G P *The Public Hearing for Item G. will begin at 8:00 p.m. Any Public Hearings, Items A through F, that have not commenced prior to 8:00 p.m, will be held immediately following this public hearing. PROPOSED Property Tax Levy Certification for 1990 and 1990 General Fund Budget VI. OLD BUSINESS (ORCHID) p,(O A. REQUEST for Reimbursement, Kingswood Addition/Jim Horne, Park Dedication/Application (f Fees VII. NEW BUSINESS (TAN) 10-1A. CANCELLATION of 1989 and 1990 Installments of Special Assessments on HUD Purchased Property/Authorize Prepayment of all Outstanding Balances ((7-B. PROPOSED 1990 Fee Schedule ; C'j3,U AMENDMENTS, Solid Waste Ordinances P ,,K D. VARIANCE, Tim & Connie White, of 4 -Feet to Side Yard Setback to Accommodate Expansion of Existing Single Family Home, 4480 Oak Chase Way (Lot 5, Block 2, Oak Chase 3rd Addition) (qj E. EXTENSION, Preliminary Plat, Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church �7l F. LICENSE, Off -Sale Liquor, Cheers Wine & Spirits/Scott Liquor Company, 1995 Rahncliff Court/Rahncliff Crossings (S�G. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, Xavier's Restaurant, to Allow On -Sale Liquor in a CSC (Community Shopping Center) District Located on Lot 3, Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition, Town Centre Drive in NW 1/4 of Sec 15 IJH. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, A & R Pallet Crating, to Allow Outside Storage in a LI (Light Industrial) District Located on Lots 4 & 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition, •East of Highway 3 in SE 1/4 of Sec 36 `� I. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT, Rahncliff Crossings, Inc., to Revise the Overall Pylon {1 Sign Exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development Located South of Cliff V Road and West of Highway 35E in NW 1/4 of Sec 32 VIII. ADDITIONAL ITEMS (GOLD) IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA (GREEN) X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 1989 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR DECEMBER 5, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING After approval is given to the December 5, 1989 City Council agenda and regular meeting minutes for the November 21 meeting, the following items are in order for consideration. A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Item 1. I -Net Services to Fire Stations #4 and S --At the November 9 City Council meeting, a request to make payment to Cable TV North Central for the installation of cable service, I -Net and Subscriber Network for Fire Stations 4 and 5 was continued to the December 5 City Council meeting, directing City staff to question the proposed installation charges. The proposed cost for the installation is $1,354.50 for Fire Station 4 and $4,709.16 for Fire Station 5. Cable TV North Central is requesting reimbursement for the installation cost due to language in the franchise agreement that states "Additional facilities would be added at no cost if they were within 200 feet of existing I -Net plant." The two Fire Stations are much further away than 200 feet. The original franchise agreement identified public buildings that were in existence at the time as receiving cable, installation of I -Net and Subscriber Network at no cost to the Burnsville/Eagan Cable Communications Commission. The franchise agreement also states that the company will be responsible for the first 200 feet of extension costs as provided by the franchise agreement. There was no provision made for future public buildings, such as Fire Stations 4 and 5. Due to their locations in the community, both exceed the conditions of the franchise agreement and, therefore, require that this payment be made from retained franchise fees. The original estimate by Cable TV North Central is in the range of $12,000. The total cost for the Sub -Net and I -Net service to Fire Stations 4 and 5 will be approximately $6,000, a savings that Cable TV North Central has agreed to. Unfortunately, the City has no further claim to total payment due to the franchise agreement that was executed by both the City and the company. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To authorize payment from retained franchise fees for the installation of both I -Net and Sub -Net to Fire Stations 4 and 5 at the reduced cost of $6,063.66. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting B. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Item 1. Review County's Proposed 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program --The County has forwarded to the City's attention their proposed 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the years 1990-1994. In addition, the County has included anticipated "projects that may require reevaluation during this 5 -Year CIP for,further consideration. However, no specific date as been set or scheduled for those improvements. Enclosed on pages and 11L is an excerpt of the Coun's CIP showing those improvements within the City of Eagan. Also enclosed on page S is a map of the City showing the location of these various improvements along with their proposed year. As can be seen, it is estimated that approximately $5,900,000 will be the City's obligation during the next five years, with an ultimate estimated City cost of $8,126,000 for all future anticipated improvements (based on 1989 dollars). It is the staff's understanding that the Dakota County Board of Commissioners has approved the budget allocation as shown for 1990. The Public Works Director would like to review these proposed improvements with the City Council and discuss any proposed revisions or modifications. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve/modify the Dakota County Highway 'S -Year, CIP. N DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP 1990-1994 NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PROJECT 4 -Lane Divided 4 -Lane Divided Temp. Signal EST. CITY COST $653,000 350,000 (1) 25,000 CITY STAFF COMMENTS Move to 1991? Traffic YEAR ROAD Move SEGMENT (FROM/TO) 1. 1990 CSAH 26 CR 43 - TH 55 2. 1990 CSAH 31 CSAH 33 - Rebecca Ln 3. 1990 CSAH 32 At Slaters Rd. 4. 1991 CR 28 un to 1991 At Coachman ,Road 5. 1991 CSAH 31 At Corporate Ctr. Dr �6. 450,000 13. 1994 CR 28 55 CSAH 63 43 - 1992- CSAH 26 TH - 7. 1992 CSAH 26 At Eagandale Blvd. 8. 1992 CR 43 At Wescott Road DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP 1990-1994 NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PROJECT 4 -Lane Divided 4 -Lane Divided Temp. Signal EST. CITY COST $653,000 350,000 (1) 25,000 CITY STAFF COMMENTS Move to 1991? Traffic Signal (1) 45,000 Move un to.1990 TH 55 (Inv.Gr.Hts.) Const. Traffic Signal (2) 45,000 Move down to 1992 0.5 Mi.E. 4 -Lane Divided 650,000 1,913,000 11. 1993 CSAH 32 Turnlane & Signal (2) 75,000 Move un to 1991 405,000 12. Traffic Signal (2) 45,000 Move un to 1991 9.' 1993 CR 28 TH 149 - TH 55 (Inv.Gr.Hts.) Const. 2 -Lane 100,000 10. 1993 CSAH 30 0.5 Mi.E. of CSAH-31 - TH 3 4 -Lane Divided 1,913,000 11. 1993 CSAH 32 TH 77 - I -35E 4 -Lane Divided 405,000 12. 1994 CSAH 26 TH 13 - CSAH 31 4 -Lane Undivided 450,000 13. 1994 CR 28 CR 43 - TH 149 4 -Lane Divided 1,150,000 SUBTOTAL $5,906,000 Possibly 6 lane? = Addt'l Cost Delay to future year? YEAR ROAD SEGMENT (FROM/TO) DAKOTA COUNTY HIGHWAY CIP 1990-1994 NOVEMBER 30, 1989 PROJECT EST. DESCRIPTION CITY COST CITY STAFF COMMENTS 14. No Date CSAH 32 ChesMar Dr. - TH 3 4 -Lane Divided $2,000,000 15. No Date CR 28 At Washington Dr. Traffic Signal (1) 40,000 1991 16. No Date CSAH 31 At Deerwood Dr. Traffic Signal (1) 45,000 1990? Relocate to High Site Dr. 17. 1990 CSAH 371 At Towerview Dr. Traffic Signal 90,000 (Funding by Unisys T.I.F.) *18. No Date CSAH 32 At Beacon Hill Rd./Thomas Traffic Signal (1) 45.000 1990? Lk. Center Dr. TOTAL *Staff Recommended Addition (1) Presently meets some of the warrants for signal installation. (2) Signal installation warrants yet to be met/measured. 26 Lone Oak Road 28 Yankee Doodle Road 32 Cliff Road 31 Pilot Knob Road 43 Lexington Avenue 30. Diffley Road $8,126,000 T Ac ( L '1" a E T J ,a rs L 1992 1.7 FI7 1993 � -w- AA -s- 1994 X ot, jZ 3 so li i A- .4- ��Jl L w m6r 'T'.' p ILI . js @ D - (iI R IN w 37 M!4. Z -L AF` 12 dp)- 4; ROSE NT F G Al M 1990 ims mim im im m 1992 1993 1994 mv,wvAr2wJ NO SCHEDULE 0 SIGNAL ( 1990 — 1994 ) A SIGNAL (NO SCHEDULE) Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting C. POLICE DEPARTMENT Item 1. Mission Statement --Early in 1989, the Chief of Police, City Administrator and Police personnel, including representatives from sworn officers, dispatchers and clerical held an all -day strategic planning session and as a result, various goals, objectives and eventually a Mission Statement was developed. While developing the Mission Statement, each employee within the department was asked for their opinion, and many of those ideas were incorporated into the Mission Statement. Chief of Police Geagan is giving each employee a copy of the Mission Statement. For a copy of a memo from Chief Geagan and the Mission Statement, refer to pages - through K Since the Mission Statement reflects public policy, it seemed appropriate for the City,Council to review and give its endorsement. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the Mission Statement as developed by the Eagan Police Department. G police department ®r 3830 Not Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612):454-3900 November 14, 1989 TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: PAT GEAGAN, POLICE CHIE1 4� SUBJECT: EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT MISSION STATEMENT PATRICK J. GEAGAN ahlol of rows KENNETH D. AOMNN Operallpru Capspin VIC ELLISON Moyer THOMAS EGAN DAVID K GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council MemCers THOMAS HEDGES Cdy Adm n6*Wv EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE COY Cleh As a result of our Strategic Planning Session early this year, the Police Department has developed a Mission Statement which the Eagan. City Council may want to review. This Mission Statement was developed by Eagan Police Department Staff. Each employee within the department was asked for their opinion and many of those ideas were incorporated into the Mission Statement. The Mission Statement, as well as the overall Strategic Plan, would not have been accomplished without the enthusiastic effort and support by Police Department Staff. The Eagan Police Department Mission Statement will be given to each employee and reviewed with each new employee. This Mission Statement will give Police Department Staff the basic foundation needed to make the Eagan Police Department one of the finest Law Enforcement Agencies in Minnesota. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police PJG:lb Attachment THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE'SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer MISSION THE MISSION OF THE EAGAN POLZCE DEPARTMENT IS TO SAFEGUARD FREEDOM, TO PRESERVE LIFE AND PROPERTY, TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS AND MAINTAIN RESPECT FOR'THE RULE OF THE LAW BY PROPER ENFORCEMENT. THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT HAS AN OPPORTUNITY GREATER THAN ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY TO PROVIDE A BROAD RANGE OF QUALITY PUBLIC'SAFETY AND HUMAN SERVICES TO OUR COMMUNITY. IN FULFILLMENT OF THIS MISSION, WE AFFIRM THAT THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT: * SHALL REGARD ALL PEOPLE WE SERVE AS PERSONS OF DIGNITY AND WORTH, AND ADJUST OUR BEHAVIOR TO MEET'THE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE WITH WHOM WE WORK OR FOR WHOM WE PROVIDE SERVICE. * SHALL MAKE PROFESSIONAL EXCELLENCE PARAMOUNT BY MEETING OR SURPASSING ESTABLISHED COMMUNITY STANDARDS OF QUALITY SERVICE. * SHALL NURTURE HIGH ETHICAL AND MORAL STANDARDS, AND RECOGNIZE THE VALUE OF EACH EMPLOYEE IN FULFILLING THE MISSION OF THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT. * SHALL MAINTAIN OPEN COMMUNICATION AND RELATIONSHIPS OF TRUST, RESPECT AND CONCERN AMONG EMPLOYEES, ADMINISTRATION, AND VOLUNTEERS TO PROVIDE AN ENVIRONMENT FOR PERSONAL SATISFACTION, GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS. * SHALL FOSTER PERSONAL INNOVATION AND ORGANIZATIONAL CREATIVITY. - * SHALL PARTICIPATE IN AND CARRY ON TRAINING AND EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES SUPPORTIVE TO ITS MISSION. ITIS CRITICAL THAT ALL MEMBERS OF THE EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT UNDERSTAND AND SUPPORT THE ORGANIZATION'S MISSION. OUR MISSION IS OUR LEGITIMATE BASIS FOR EXISTENCE AND THE BASIS OF OUR PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, GOALS, OBJECTIVES,, RULES, REGULATIONS, OPERATING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND PRACTICES. 06 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting �NSENT AiGElYDA;; There are fourteen (14) items on the agenda referred to as consent items requiring one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Additional Items unless the discussion required is brief. PERSONNEL ITEMS A. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. Resignation/Police Officer -- On November 24, 1989, the City received a letter of resignation from Patrol Officer Tomma A. Freundschuh, effective December 17, 1989. Officer Freundschuh has accepted a position with the Minneapolis Police Department. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To accept, the resignation of Patrol Officer Tomma. A. Freundschuh, effective December 17, 1989. Item 2. Investigative Sergeant Position -- As a part of organizational development for the Eagan Police Department, Police Chief Geagan had proposed the establishment of the position of Investigative Sergeant for both 1989 and 1990. After discussions with the City Administrator, it was determined that the position would definitely be proposed to the City Council to begin in calendar year 1991. However, recent events have caused the consideration of this position to be updated. One of the present sergeants, Sergeant Ken Conyers, was recently injured on duty (injury to right hand) to such an extent that his doctor has determined that Sergeant Conyers would not be able to safely perform the duties which could be required of a Patrol Sergeant and would run a significant risk of continuing re-injury. Under the Human. Rights Act, an employer is under an obligation to provide reasonable accommodation for the handicapped. Creating a totally new position would probably not be regarded as reasonable accommodation. However, if a position already exists, the establishment of which is planned for the near future, it would be appropriate to move the establishment of that position to the present time: The doctor and the City's workers' compensation representatives both support the assignment of Sergeant Conyers to the position of Investigative Sergeant as being more beneficial for both the City and Sergeant Conyers than retraining Conyers for another line of work. The sergeant is an experienced police professional who first began employment with the City of Eagan in 1975. He is also experienced and has performed well in investigation. The move from Patrol Sergeant to Investigative Sergeant would be a lateral move. City Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting Administrator Hedges and Chief of Police Geagan both support and recommend to the Council that the position of Investigative Sergeant be moved up from January 1, 1991 to the present and that Sergeant Ken Conyers be appointed to the new position. This move would not entail the hiring of a completely new employee and there is money in the Police Department's 1989 budget to cover this item. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the creation of the position of Investigative Sergeant, effective in December, 1989, and to approve the appointment of Sergeant Ken Conyers to this position. Item 3. Patrol Sergeant Position -- If the above action concerning the Investigative Sergeant position is approved, the City will be short one Patrol Sergeant. For the Council's information, the department is currently operating with only two sergeants instead of four, as the result of injuries to two of the sergeants. Therefore, it would be advisable to appoint a Patrol Sergeant for the vacancy left by Sergeant Conyers as soon as possible. The City held oral boards and examinations for the position of sergeant earlier this year. Because less than a year has passed since these promotion examinations, it is the recommendation of Chief of Police Geagan that the next officer on the eligibility list for sergeant be appointed Patrol Sergeant at this time. That person is Officer Steven Grimm. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the appointment of Officer Steven Grimm to the position of Patrol Sergeant, effective in December, 1989. Item 4. Compensation/Winter Recreation Leaders -- The City of Eagan has experienced difficulty in recruiting a sufficient number of applicants for Winter Recreation Leaders this year. In addition, the City would be placed in a very awkward position if any number of the leaders were to resign before the season's end. These positions basically are the warming house and sliding hill attendants who monitor activities at the City's winter facilities, are present to respond to emergency situations, and act as the City's representative. The leaders are in direct contact with Eagan residents of all ages. The City's current starting wage for these positions is $4.50 per hour. This wage rate has not been adjusted during the last two years. The City has surveyed other cities to ascertain their wage rates for this position and also other employers in the Eagan area who offer pan time jobs. In order to be competitive with these markets and to attract and retain applicants who can successfully and reliably perform tasks as winter recreation leaders, it is the recommendation of the Director of Parks and Recreation that the City maintain the current base wage rates for winter recreation leaders but also add a $ .50 per hour incentive for all leaders who complete the season's work. This system is used in other cities and has been successful. pj- Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a $ .50 per hour incentive for all Winter Recreation Leaders who complete the season. Item 5. Winter Recreation Leaders -- The following persons are recommended for hire as Winter Recreation Leaders by Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi. Additional recommendations will be presented to the Council with the Administrative Agenda Packet, on Monday or at future Council meetings. Returning Staff: New Staff: Brad Czubernat Sara Berkebile Kevin Duffy Barry Billmeyer Mike Geere Pat Boquist Tim Gill Troy Christopherson Andy Halvorsen Jami Lee Cullen Cory Lynch Rob De Rosier Tim McElligott Chris Fitch Tom McNurlin Tyrone Johnson Jeff Olson Shane Johnson Brent Tait Shannon Kerry John Tracy Roger Ketterline Tom Wise Kent Knutson Brandon Kusnier Steven Lakler Catherine Liberty Daniel McNamara Ray Sperl Pete Walters David Wang ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the persons listed above as Winter Recreation Leaders for the 1989-90 winter season. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting AMUSEMENT DEVICE/POCKETS B. License, Amusement Devices for Pockets/Summit Amusement --A request by Summit Amusement Company for appro)dmately 37 amusement devices is in order for consideration. Included as amusement devices are 11 Valley pool tables, four pinball machines and the remainder are game machines such as Superstars, Black Night, Police Force, etc. The Police Department has reviewed this application and given its approval for consideration by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an amusement device license for Summit Amusement for 37 amusement machines at Pockets located at 2020 Silver Bell Road. l� Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting RESOLUTION/MNDOT SPEED LIMIT STUDY/JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE RD C. Approve Resolution Requesting MnDOT Speed Limit Study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff Road To Diffley Road) --With the recent completion of Johnny Cake Ridge Road from the Mallard Park Addition to Diffley Road, it would be appropriate to have a formal speed study performed on the entire segment of Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Cliff to Dtlf�ey to ensure that the proper enforceable speed limit is established. Enclosed on page is a resolution necessary to request MnDOT to prepare the appropriate speed limit study to establish an enforceable speed limit. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve a Resolution requesting MnDOT speed limit study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff Road to Diffley Road). RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN SPEED LIMIT DESIGNATION MnDOT SPEED STUDY REQUEST WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has recently constructed Johnny Cake Ridge Road as a public street within the community; and, WHEREAS, the City would like to establish enforceable speed limits along this local street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, hereby request the MnDOT Metro - District to perform all required speed studies necessary to designate the proper speed limit for the street described as follows: Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Cliff Road (County Road 32) to Diffley Road (County Road 30) located in the W ; of Section 28, Township 27, Range 23 in Dakota County. Motion made by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest• Its Clerk CERTIFICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this day of , 1989. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting AMENDMENT/HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE 11 D. Amendment to Development Contract, Hills of Stonebridge II --The final plat for Hills of Stonebridge II was approved by the City Council at the October 17, 1989 meeting. Inadvertently, the exhibit B attached to the development agreement was included in error. Therefore, approval of the application should be amended to delete the original exhibit B in the development contract and replace it with the corrected version: Because this issue has yet to be resolved, the Community Development Department is requesting that this item be continued indefinitely. For additional"informaton on this item, refer to a � memo from Community Development enclosed on page (P . Once a corrected development agreement is in place, it will be scheduled for formal Council action. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue indefinitely the amendment to the development contract for the Hills of Stonebridge II. l� MEMO TO: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER FROM: MARLENE 2ALE2NICRj PLANNER I vkz- DATE: DECEMBER 1t 1989 SUBJECT: STATUS OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR HILLS OF STONEBRIDGE PLAT II The final plat for the above -referenced subdivision was approved by the City Council on October 17, 1989. Exhibit B of the Development Contract approved with this final plat is incorrect. To correct Exhibit B, an amendment document was drafted and scheduled for City Council approval on November 9, 1989. The developer, however, did not sign the amendment because he was unsure of his ability to comply with Item 6 of the revised Exhibit B. Item 6 requires the developer to increase the wet pond volume of Pond JP -22 by 1.8 acre feet for a total wet pond volume of 3.0 acre feet. Three acre feet of wet pond volume was the amount determined by Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation as necessary to reduce phosphorous loading of this development to pre -development levels. It should be noted that this requirement was a condition of preliminary plat approval granted on June 6, 1989. The developer's engineer, City Engineering and Planning staff, and a representative from Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation met on November 30, 1989, to discuss this issue. At this meeting, the developer's representative indicated that providing the required wet pond volume in Pond JP -22 would be expensive and may impact a stand of mature oak trees. It was determined by staff that a 'lesser wet pond volume increase in Pond JP -22 may be acceptable, provided the wet pond volume of Pond JP -53 is also increased. The combined wet pond volume of Ponds JP -22 and JP -53, however, must reduce phospherous loading to pre -development levels. The developer's engineer is currently performing calculations to ensure this standard will be met. The development contract amendment was originally scheduled for City Council on November 9 and twice deferred to the November 21 and December 5 meetings. Staff recommends indefinite deferral to assure that Item 6 of Exhibit B can be adequately resolved. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting 01 PROPERTY DONATION/WEST PUBLISHING E. Accept Donated Property from West Publishing --Recently West Publishing donated a barn to the City of Eagan to be used for Fire Department training. Since West will be claiming this donation as a charitable contribution, it is necessary for the City to formally acknowledge the receipt of the property and to execute the required IRS forms. The value of the barn is listed at $63,683. The Fire Department has completed its training and the barn was burned. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve acceptance of the barn by West Publishing Company as a donation and authorize the City Clerk to execute the IRS forms on behalf of the City of Eagan. LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSEPI'RANSPORTATION CLUB OF ST PAUL F. Application for Exemption from Lawful Gambling License, Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis/Dennis Ellingson, Program Administrator --Mr. Dennis Ellingson representing the Transportation Club of St. Paul/Minneapolis has made application for an exemption from a lawful gambling license. The Transportation Club is selling calendars as a fund raiser and attached to each calendar is a raffle ticket and the winning ticket received $20. Mr. and Mrs. Ellingson are Eagan residents and they plan to make the drawings from their home. The drawings for daily winners will continue until December 20 with all proceeds from calendar sales going to the University of Minnesota Variety Club, Children's Hospital and other charitable organizations. The Ellingsons qualify for an exemption from the lawful gambling license due to the nature of the raffle and the low winning amount of $20. For additional information and a copy of their application, refer to pages t 8 through cD The Police Department is reviewing the application and their findings will be presented with the Administrative Agenda on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the application for an exemption from lawful gambling license for the Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis. lI MEMO TO: POLICE CHIEF GEAGAN FROM: LIEUTENANT STEVENSON DATE: NOVEMBER 300 1989 SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM LAVFUL GAMBLING LICENSE TRANSPORTATION CLUB OF ST PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS The Transportation Club is a social/educational organization made up from eight separate clubs (Delta Nu Alpha fraternity, Twin City Traffic Club, etc.). It is a professional organization for people in the transportation field. They have printed up 5,000 calendars and are selling them to their own members and friends, not door to door, for $5.00. $1,700 goes to printing costs, $8,300 goes to pay out on the raffle ($20.00 daily and two $500 prizes) and the rest (anything over $10,000) goes to the University Children's Hospital. This organization is 19 years old. The routine checks on the program administrators all came back fine. Their intention is to hold the drawings at their home on December 20th. I find no reason to ask the Council to pass a resolution prohibiting this raffle. to CG220 Minnesota Lawful Gambling few. fees, Application for Exemption from For Office Use Only Lawful Gambling License Fill in the unshaded portions of this application for exemption and send it in at least 45 days before your gambling activity for processing. Name and Address of Oraanization =i HC 7 2A,'SPORTA7)0AI 041 OZ 6ra.(xi2�s _ A)r„-4-r- ) - .9 -7,5? 57 -7 71F/ Seem - -- -- Clry - S!ete Zip code County, 81,20 P -,.✓al 4-1 Yt'W -S /a/ h/ca ✓c Chiel executive officer Phone Alanager // Phone _1Xo. qS D. F,scJ.54�/j (b,2) yS7-973s W.C. Cle. rlc A (612) et8'-3F7y' Type of Non-profit Organization Years in existence = Attach proof of three -years or more of existence. Number of active members EI Fraternal O Religious ❑ Veterans ❑ Other non-proth N you checked box for other nonprofit, Cheek one of the following and attach proof of nonprofit status [I IRS designation incorporated with Secretary of State ❑ Affiliate of parent nonprofit organization (charter, .y M GaV_rtkLiMcljS_ite Name of site where activity will take place / �^ _�.)F_NNIS C S<-.✓�.. E.i1r�j o -w ` �61�J/1M 1..� /��Q.«,.rrST2 `I,� _. Street U City Slate�— Zip code County 4'7Uy.. evdr 4 Ccm,27 �gsL 611) SSraa b�akv;.s- t Dates) of activity cams Bingo Yes No _0_ —_1 Rattles __pl_ Paddlewheels l -I Tipboard5-. ------ f7 Pull -tabs How will profit be used- may„_„{rp Jc, iA e h.1 %/{itic} C(u.6 //,, I OYkmc CGai2f i4/�/t lllr.,IAnj.yS �/d5 ,-�AL m!)5ar,7Ff+�. I dedare all information submitted to the Department of Gaming is true, accurate, and complete Local Government Acknowledgement I have received a copy of this application. This application will be reviewed by the 1.;eparunent of Gaming and will become effoctivo 30 days from the date of receipt by the city or county, unless the localgovernment parses o resolutmn to specifically prohibit the activity. A copy of that resolution must be received by the Department of Gaming within 30 days of the dare filled in below- Cities of the firs) class have 60 days in which to gcallow the activity. or City or county name Signature of person receiving application I iee/ .J'. Date received m.mn Signatuie of person receiving application Title Date rewivud rm._oaa n,.-a2.nwm Mall this application and fee of $25 (check made out to Commissioner of Revenue) to: ,Ma/ aarO �VmrbPyr.YVMb Department of Gaming -Gambling Control Division Mail Stadion 3315 St. Paul, M14 551463315 `-I S To All To Whom These rresents 9hnIk I;oeie, Greeting: Wherena, an Agreement and Artirloe of Consolidation be— tMeen The Tranaporation Club of Saint Vaal, Inc. and The Traffic Club of Mizinespolis, both Minnesota nonprofit corpora— times, dilly signed, certified and e.cknced.e•dgpd under oath, has hewn filed for record in this office on thn .17th dny of June, 1974, nt 9100 o'clock A.M., for the connolidntion of the above nn"d corporations into and under the nave of The Transportation Glob of Minnespolia and St, Paul, Inc., Kith registered office In St-, rntA. Minne!wta, parnunnt to the pToVisions of the ittanenoty Nonprofit Corporation Act, Chspter 317, ltinneacta 4tntnE•n. Now, tf+erefore, I, Arlen I, Frdshl, Secretary of State of thm 9tnte of Hien-snotn, by virtne of the pavers and duties vented is we by lav, do hereby certify that sold above named eorrarntione nra legally conaolidnt.ed into and evade an ezLoting eorpornt.ion ander the nnrn of Tho T'rwi,,portation Club of Hisneapolis end St. caul, Inc., wf.t.h the Ivwers, rights and pvivilages, and subject to the linitntinns, duties and re— ntTietiv.,r,w which by leu nrpvrtnf.n t.hcrnto. *,, ttH1h:!;9 my ifficial signature hereiatto nubneribed and the Great. "^;+I of thn State of r:I+•n.: :;..+: a I rre,ultn nli'ircd thla sevc.ni ecnUi ,I;+y of .1me, A. V., t• _ t. ;C_ .:, 1. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting FINAL PLATITOWN CENTRE 100 5TH ADDITION G. Final Plat, Town Centre 100 Sth Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) --Because the letter of intent for this project is not yet in place and signed copies of the development agreement still have not been received by the City, the developer is requesting that the plat be continued to the December 19, 1989, City Council meeting. Due to the fact that the final plat was placed on the City Council agenda of October 17, continued to November 9, continued to December 5 and is being requested for continuance again, it is strongly recommended that this item be continued indefinitely and not placed on a future Council agenda until all documentation is in place. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To continue the final plat for Town Centre 100 5th Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) indefinitely until such time as all documentation is in order. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting FINAL PLAT/GEORGE W. GILES ADDITION H. Final Plat, George W. Giles Addition --All documents relative to the final plat for George W. Giles Addition including the development agreement have been processed by both the applicant and the Department of Community Development. If .there are any reason that the final plat, should be removed from the agenda, a recommendation will be made at the time the agenda is adopted for the meeting. Enclosed on page 0.3 is a copy of the final plat as it appears for signature and recording at Dakota County. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve the final plat for George W. Giles Addition. 9 EXHIBIT "A" GEORGE W o„ tlo* r------� GILES ADDITION -gE 6, rn R8 Agenda Information Memo December 5; 1989, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETION/FINAL PYMT/EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PK 9TH & 10TH I. Contract 88-10, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th & 10th Additions - Streets & Utilities) --We have received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a statement from our consulting engineer that all improvements have been completed in accordance with the City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by Public Works personnel and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 88-10 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th & 10th Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the 7th and final payment to Richard Knutson, Inc., in the amount of $50,590.56. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETIONIFINAL PYMT/SOUTH OAKS ADDN J. Contract 88.30, Acknowledgement of Completion/Authorize Final Payment (South Oaks Addition - Streets & Utilities) --The City has received a request for final payment from the contractor along with a statement from the consulting engineer that the improvements have been completed in accordance with the City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge completion of Contract 88-30 (South Oaks Addition - Streets & Utilities) and authorize the 8th and final payment to Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc., in the amount of $9,225.14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETION/FINAL PYMT/COMMUNITY OF JOY CHURCH K. Contract 88 -KK, Acknowledgement of Completion (Community of Joy Church - Utilities) --The installation of utilities under the above -referenced private contract have been completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. Final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for formal acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledgement completion of Contract 88 -KK (Community of Joy Church - Utilities). 0 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETION/UPS L. Contract 85-R, Acknowledgement of Completion (UPS - Utilities) -The installation of utilities performed privately by the developer have been completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for final acknowledgement of completion. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To acknowledge the completion of Contract 85-R (UPS - Utilities). ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COMPLETIONIFINAL PYMT (WELL #12 - PUMPHOUSE & FACILITIES) M. Contract 88-32, Acknowledgement of Completion/Final Payment (Well #12 - Pumphouse & Facilities) --The City has received a certification from our consulting engineering firm of Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc., indicating that the above - referenced contract has been completed in accordance with City approved plans and specifications. All final inspections have been performed by representatives of the Public Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action authorizing final payment. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: Acknowledge the completion of Contract 88-32 (Well #12 - Pumphouse & Facilities) and authorize the fifth and final payment of $12,337.71 to Shingobee Builders, Inc. Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting VACATION/THOMAS LAKE & DIFFLEY ROAD N. Vacate Utility Easement/Schedule Public Hearing (Thomas Lake/Diffley Road - Sanitary Sewer) --During the construction and upgrading of Diffley Road, a sanitary sewer was installed with a future stub to the north for later extension. Due to the conflict with the existing Williams Brothers Pipeline pressure station located at this intersection, the sanitary sewer stub had to be relocated to avoid construction conflicts. This results in the necessity to acquire an additional easement and vacate the previously dedicated easement as shown by the sketch enclosed on page. Therefore, it would be appropriate to proceed with the formal public hearing to vacate the old easement dedication. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To receive the request to vacate a sanitary sewer and utility easement (Thomas Lake and Diffley Road) and schedule a public hearing to be held on 'January 2, 1990. ®iffley MH -5 - --- --17 -- P -- 0 0 R v v � 2�4i r P.I.D. 02100-011-51 a v � n ca 4 Q� EASEMENT TO B$ VACATED _ �30' fb Road , ADDITIONALLY ACQUIRED DRAINAGE '& UTILITY EASEMENT I ulm I O O ' I a E � 4. LL- I J N SEE SHEET 50 0 50 100 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting yPIFBIICC ;HEARINGS;; VACATE PORTION OF WESTERLY R -O -W (LE)UNGTON WAY) A. Vacate Portion of Westerly Right -of -Way (Lexington Way) --On November 9th, the City Council considered a request by staff to vacate the excess portion of the westerly right-of-way resulting from the previous realignment of County Road 43 and the recent upgrading of the Lexington Way cul-de-sac as shown by the sketch and legal description enclosed on page 21__. A public hearing was scheduled for December 5th and all notices were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies and property owners informing them of this public hearing. There are existing telephone and electric facilities located in this proposed vacated public right-of-way. Therefore, the vacation should be subject to the retention of an underlying utility easement necessary to accommodate the existing facilities. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of the westerly right-of-way of Lexington Way as described subject to the retention of underlying utility easements for existing facilities. M s ...:J'. .... _AST _:eE J' •EST www ICET C' "E 50'12'92"E _sow I r M z M b • 1179.58 90'12'92"E U .._ _,.: e°- NAY - - — — - LEX�N0T0n —__—---_—,x•-s _ _ ---- .:woo• i T_ 0'b 0. i•fOw � � s - - - -' y9N�-j.� •i� ZJO' V z z M W "9~0e -E 0 M N M n U 0 847-K1 z - 0 N m - n N � W Proposed description. to vacate that part of Lexington Avenue and Lexington Way contained within the following described tracts of land: That part of the NW k of the SW k of Section 23, Township 27, Range 23, lying southwesterly of a line 60.00' southwest and parallel to the following described line: e Commencing at the NW corner of the NW k of the SW k of said Section 23, thence South 0012'520 East on an assumed bearing along the west line of said Section 23 a distance of 847.66 feet to the point of beginning, thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1125.65 feet and a central angle of 47°54'02', a distance of 941.07 feet and there terminating. Also, that part of the E k of the SE k of Section 22, Township 27, Range 23, lying northerly of Line 'A" and southwesterly of Line "B" as described below: Line "A": Commencing at the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Eagan Evangelical Covenant Church Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, thence southerly along the west line of said Lot 1 a distance of 178.44 feet to the point of beginning, thence southwesterly along a non-tangential curve. Concave to the southeast having a radius of 60.00 feet, central angle 60°00'00" and a cord bearing of South 29647108" West, a distance of 62.83 feet, thence South 0012'52" East on an assumed bearing along the East line of said Section 22 a distance of 847.66 feet to the point of beginning, thence southeasterly along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1125.65 feet and a central angle of 47054.020, a distance of 941.07 feet and there terminating. Agenda Information, Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting VACATIONIPORTION OF T.H. 13 B. Vacate Portion of T.H. 13 (Neil Heine) --With the new construction of the Cedar Avenue Freeway (T.H.77), T.H.,13cwas realigned from its previous location. Subsequently,. MnDOT turned back to the City of'Eagan the right-of=way for the Old T.H. 13 alignment. On November 9, the City Council received a petition from the property owner, Mr. Neil Heine, at 4141 E. T.H. 13, requesting the City to vacate the excess right-of-way of this MnDOT turnback as shown by the. sketch and legal description enclosed on page. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, the City has not received any objections to this proposed vacation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of excess public right-of-way for that portion of T.H. 13 as described and authorize the Mayor and, City Clerk to execute all related documents necessary for recording. "JK Q a [z R Cd 0 U d m ft 4 4 N w y t ,f0 �— C/l: OLD T.11. 17 SKETCH i OF NEAL HEINE PROPERTY I Area to be Vacated PIIOMSED R/m LIK That ,part of the NortMast Quarter of the -Southwest quarter. Section 19. Tardh p 27 North. Range 23 Veit, described o follmst Coeeaeiag at the north9est corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwa t Quarter{ theme on an saauaed bearing of South 00 degree 02 minutes 26 saeoods'Nesr 1291.00 feet along the vast line of maid Northwest quarter of the Southwest Quarter; theses North 62 degrees 09 RimteD 56 seconds Rest 673.11 feet to the Borth eaterly right of way line of old Trunk Nighwq No. 13, the point of hegi®ing of the tract to be described; theme South 50 degrees 04 minutes 3g seconds Seat, radially to daid.h1gh9q. 112.56 fest to the center line of said highways thence southwesterly 49/.18 feet along said center line. being • curve, concays to the southeest"awving a radius of 5723.29 fed and a central angle of 4 degrees 53 minutes 14 seconds. to the south lice of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes l8 seconds Nest 136.22 feat along: the mouth line of. said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter to said northwesterly right of way line; thence northeasterly 575.74 fest along said right of way line, parallel with maid center line, being a curve having a radius of 5873.79 feet and a central angle of 5 degrees 38 minutes 55 seconds, to the point of beginning) except the S.E. 401 thereof.. CO. RD. 30 I S.N. Cor Section 19 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting VACATE PORTION OF CEDARVALE BLVD C. Vacate Portion of Cedarvale .Boulevard (Cedarvale Shopping Center) --There have been several public hearings regarding this vacation previously. Major concerns have, related to the continuance of the existing MTC Park and Ride facility and the requirement of the property owner to upgrade its parking lot expansion into this vacated .public right- of-way to current City standards. These issues and concerns have been finally resolved and included in an agreement which requires them toretain and maintain the existing. Park and Ride facility until such time that the City of Eagan provides formal notice of its abandonment or discontinuance. This agreement has been fully executed by all appropriate parties and is ready for formal Council action. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected utility companies informing them of this proposed vacation. The City has received a response from NSP requesting that an underlying utility easement be retained to protect their existing facilities located within the area to be vacated. In addition, there are existing City facilities within this vacated right-of-way that should be protected by an underlying utility easement also. Enclosed on page is a legal description and map showing the location of the excess right-of-way requested to be vacated. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve the vacation of a portion of Cedarvale Boulevard as described subject to the retention of an underlying utility easement for all existing facilities. 3-:2— - T-21' R -Z3 i%—') oLL P -3W1 ; OLD STATC TF:'JNK :11'GH'JYAY Nu_13 ) CE:DARVALE BOULEVARD x? i O r -SYB 3loT'W 1218.81 -- OE i / e K W 4-M7 Taz .+a 0 F ONTAGEOA I50 '' -- M 48'3l'oT^E 12.18.81 I ` Cedorvoio S"OPPig9 STREET VACATION DESCRIPTION (part of Cedarvale Boulevard and Old Frontage Road to State Trunk Hwy. 13) Center ` That part of Cedarvale Boulevard (old State Trunk Highway No. 13) and the adjoining Frontage Road lying southeasterly thereof described as follows: Commencing at the northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of Section, 19, Township 27, Range 23,, Dakota County, Minnesota; thence S 6024'35"E on an assumed bearing along the west line thereof, a distance of 2018.74 feet to the tangent intersection with the centerline of Old State Trunk Highway No. 13 right-of-way; thence N 48°37'07" E along said centerline , a distance of 564.97 feet; thence S 41022'53" E, a distance of 73.50 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described,; thence S 41°22'53" E, a distance of 79.00 feet; thence N 48°37'07" E along the southeasterly line of said Frontage Road, a distance of 1218.81 feet; thence N 41°22'53" W, a distance of 79.00 feet; thence 5'480-37'O7" W along a line parallel with and 40'feet southeasterly of the inplace Cedarvale Boulevard centerline, a distance of 1218.81 feet to the point of beginning. z r r O � O. o r c °s z _ Mob, c or OaIn o m _ 3 � o x w 1 r C) 1 0 z M x x ED 1 I Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL. PKISTREETLIGHTS) D. Project 574, Eagandale Center Industrial Park (Streetlights) -In response to a petition submitted by one of the major property owners in this Industrial Park (Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company), the Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility .report for the 'installation 'of streetlights in this area. On November 9; the Council received a feasibility report and scheduled a public hearing to be held orl December 5 t formally discuss the proposed improvements. Enclosed on pages 3S through is a copy of that feasibility report for the Council's information and>review during the public hearing presentation to be provided by the Director of Public Works. A meeting has beenscheduled with representatives of Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance and Opus Corporation to discuss the proposed project. Any additional comments or concerns raised during this meeting will be addressed at the public hearing. All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. As of this date, staff has not received any objections to the proposed improvements. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 574 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Streetlights) and, if approved, authorize their installation by NSP. 3 `� CITY OF RAGAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTKENT FEASIBILITY REPORT' FOR STREETLIGHTING' PROJECT #574 EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK A11 of Section 3 West of 35 E except Country Home Heights Addition November 6, 1989 3S iWoFeagan 3830, PILOT MOB ROAD MC ELL SON EAGAN. MINNESOTA 55122.1897 M°' PHONE:,(61214548100 THOMAS EGAN FAX (612145478363 DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA, November 34, 1989 THEODORE WACHTER cw'c M m THOMAS HEDGES Cay Ad�OWV EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCIL °Cry k CITY OF EAGAN 3830 PILOT 'KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MN- 55122-1897 RE,:, City Project No. 574 Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Streetlights Dear Mayor and City Council: Enclosed is the feasibility report for the Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Streetlights. Included is a preliminary cost estimate and preliminary assessment roll for the project. Staff will be available to discuss and present the details of the project to the Council and other interested public at a time convenient to the Council. e pectfully su itted, M chael P. Foertsch, (4PE. Assistant City Engineer Enclosures MPF/7'f I hereby certify that the attached plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Mi- L� Date: /1 -/y -k Reg. No- / Zd`/f THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF 'STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 2`(— co e: This project covers the installation of streetlights serving all of Section 3, West of 35E except the Country Home Heights Addition. Feasibility 4 Recommendations: This project is feasible and is in accordance with the City's policy on the installation of street lights in this commercial/ industrial district. It can best be accomplished as outlined herein and not as a part of any other project. Discussion: The Opus Corporation in joint venture with Northwestern Mutual Life have petitioned for the installation of streetlights within the Eagandale Center Industrial ,Par k, North of Co. Rd. 26 (Lone Oak Rd.) and West of I -35E. The area consists of 116 commercial and industrial lots, parcels, and/or outlots which would benefit from streetlighting. Under the City's Streetlighting Policy, the proposed cost of streetlight installation is to assess the benefitted property on an area basis. The energy costs will be calculated on an area basis and will be billed quarterly to the existing developed properties along with the utility billing and the undeveloped properties are to be billed through a 5 year special assessment plan. The energy needs of Section 3 West of 35E, except Country Home Heights, are serviced by.Northern States, Power Company, and they offer the type of streetlighting poles, lighting fixtures, and the necessary maintenance service required by the City's Streetl•ighting policy. The project is proposed to have 21 streetlights installed, of which 4 will be private. The four private lights will be assessed against Lots 1-3, Block 3 Eagandale Office Park 3rd and Lots 1-2, Block 3, Eagandale Center Industrial Park as per the owners request. Overhead Streetlights: These 21 streetlights would be the standard overhead design with 38' fiberglass poles., a 6' mast arm, and a 'Shoe Box type fixture. (See Exhibit "A") These lights, underground wires, and transformers are proposed to be installed and maintained by Northern States Power Company,. Installation cost Estimates: The following cost estimate includes the cost of materials, labor., administration, legal and other related project costs. Public Lights 17 ea. -250 watt overhead streetlights @$3,031.95 $51,543.17 S% Contingency Factor 2,577.16 15$ Administration Cost 7.731.80 $61,851.80 Private Liahts 4 ea. -250 watt overhead 5$ Contingency Factor 15% Administration Cost TOTAL Energy cost Estimates: streetlights @$3,031.95 $7.65/light/month 21 Ea. @ $7.65 x'12 months 15% Overhead Cost $12,127.80 606.39 1.81'9.17 $14,553.37 $76,405.17 1,,,927.80/year-. 289.17 $2,216.97 Revenue Sources: Adequate revenue to cover the installation cost of this project will come from special assessments against the benefitted properties. Revenue for the energy and maintenance will come from the monthly utility billing for each developed parcel along with,a special assessment for the first five years of energy cost for the proportionate share of each undeveloped parcel. Assessments: Assessments are proposed to be levied in accordance with current City policy. All costs of the project, including installation and energy will be assessed and spread over 5 years at a rate of interest, determined by the bond sale used to finance this project. Installation• Construction cost with overhead less (4) private lights _ Total Assessable Acreage = $76,.405.17 - $14,553.37 = $61,851.80 = 337.4428 - $183.30/Acre Construction. cost with overhead of (4) private lights r Total .Assessable Acreage of the (5) benefitted lots = $792.70/Acre. ($34,553.37 _ 18.3593 = $792.70) Energy: Energy costs will be recovered either through a quarterly user fee or a 5 Year Assessment Plan. Quarterly user fees apply to developed lots with an established utility billing account,. whereas the 5 Year Assessment Pian will be applied'to.a'll lots not developed at the time of the final assessment hearing. The energy rates are defined as follows: Ouarterly User Fee (Develooed Lots) Public Lights ($7.65) x (•17 Lights) x (3 months) _ $,390.15 337.4428 Total Assessable Acres = $ 1.16/Acre x 15% Overhead = $ 1.33/Acre/Quarter M Private Lights ($.7.65) x (4 Lights) x (3 months') _ $ 91.80 + 18.:3593 Assessable Acres $ 5.00/Acre x 15% Overhead $ 5.75/Acre + 1.31 _ $ 7.A8/Acre/Quarter 5 Year Assessment Plan (Undeveloped Lots) (132.14 Acres) x (1.38 Acre) x (20 Quarters) c $3#515.00 + 132.14 6.60/Acre PROJECT SCHEDULE Feasibility Report Public Hearing Approve Plans and Specifications Construction Completed Final Assessment Hearing First Payment Due with Taxes ASSESSMENT AREA ravandale Center Industrial Park Lots 12 - 15, BlocknI November 9,, 1989 December 5, 1989 December 5, 1989 Summer of 1990 August, 1990 May, 1991 Lots 1-3, 5-11,27-36, 041, 042, 132, 133 Block 2 Lots 1-9', 111,, 141,, 142., Block 3 Lots 15, 062, 171, 191, Block 4 Lots 1-11, 15, 121, 201, 230, Block 5 Lots 1-5, Block 6 Lots 1-12,. 140, 141, 151, 171, Block 7 Lots 1-5, Block 8 Outlot 1 EanwndaleCenter industrial Park i7 Lots 1,2,4, 03,1„ Block 1 Eagandale Center Industrial Park #8 Lots 021,, 022', 3, 4, Block 1 Eagandale Office Park Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 1, Block 2 Lots 1-3,, Block 3 Eagandale office Park 2nd Lot 1, Block '1 Lots 1-4,, Block 2 Eagandale Office .Park 3rd Lots 1-3, Block 1 Eacandale Office Park 4th Lots,1 & 2, Block 1 Eagandale Center Ist Addition Lots l & 2, Block 1 Section 3 Parcel 010-02 010-03 020-03 010-05 Registered Land Survey 447 Tracts C q i3 CAP'FURNISHED !Y',POLE SUP.PLIER B city of eagan. PUBLIC !< WORKS n DEPARTME COBRA -MEAD" DESIGN un -BIDE box, DESIGN OR 'SHOE DOX4 DESIGN Pole Setting Depths: Poll LWptn Setting Depte A B 30, 50.0" 55, W -O" •I' 6,'0" NOTE% M.P.S. LUMINAIRES OFFERED 150WATT 250 WATT 400 WATT NOTE I.' To assure that poles remoin straight, extreme core must be taken during the backfill tamping process 2 Whenpoor Compacting soil is encountered o special Blass Y type backfill material shall be used. 3 Fixture mouhling and Wiring., see monufaelurer instructions.. COM,MERGIAL STREET LIGHTING WITH FIBER GLASS POLE EXHIBIT "A" standard approved plate tF% 2-89 1 720 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGRTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY,NOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE ONE IPROPERTT I I I I I I IEAGANDALE CENTER ') I r ILot 12, Block 1 ILot 13, Block 1 ILot 14, Block 1 ILot = 15, Block 1 ILot 1, Block 2 Itat 2, Block 2 Itot 3, Block 2 Itot 041, Block 2 Itot 042, Block 2 ILot 5, Block 2 ILot 6, .Block 2 1Lot 7, Block 2 ILot 8, Block 2 ILot 9, Block 2' ILot 10,Block 2. AREA I I I I I ' S.F. ACRES I I INDUSTRIAL PARK 94,032 91,347 92;380 92,172 52,492 44,640 63,032 23,234 20,326 63,560 43,560 43,560 44,148 43,560 43,560 2.1587 2.0970 2.1208 2.1160 1.2051 1.0248 1.4470 0.5334 0.4666 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0135 1.0000 1.0000 1 5 YEAR 1 I IINSTALLATION COST I TOTAL ' I ASSESSMENT QUARTER I I I 1 .ASSESS. I ENERGY COST I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I I I I COST I I I I I IRATE/ACRE I S I I IRATE/ACRE I S I I s I I 1 1.33/ACRE I I I I 26.60 0.71 1 [ 57.46 1 183.3 I 395.69 I I 453.11 1 I 26.60 1 1:33/ACRE 55:78 I' 183.3 384.38 1 440.16 i 26.60 1.36 1 183.3 388.74 1 388.74 1 26:60 56.29 1 183.3 387.86 1 444.15 1 1 1 26.60 I 1 183.3 I 220.89 1 220.89 1 1 26.60 1 1833 187.85 1 187.85 1 1 26.60 1 183.3 265.24 1 265.24 I 1 26.60 1 183.3 97.77 1 97.77 1 26.60 1 183.3 85.53 I 85.53 1 1 26.60 1' 183.3 181.30 I 183.30 1 26.60 1 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 1 26.60 I 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 I 26.60 1 183.3 185.77 I 185.77 1 1 26.60 •' 1 183.3 183.30,1 183.30 1 1 26.60 1 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1 1989 I 1 I I IUTILITT BILLING I I IEMERGT COST PER QUARTER I I I I RATE/ACRE I COST S I 1 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I 1 I 1.33%ACRE I L33/ACRE 2.82 I 1 1.33/ACRE 0 1 I 1 1.33/ACRE I 1.60 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.36 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.93 1 1 1.33/ACRE 0.71 1 1 1.33/ACRE 0.62 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33 1 1 1:33/ACRE 1.33 I 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33 1 1 1.33/ACRE 1.36 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33 I 1.33/ACRE 1.33 1 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT N0. 574 .ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY ROME ,HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE 3NO ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY PROPERTY AREA 5 YEAR 1110STALLATION COST I TOTAL 1 1989 ASSESSMENT ASSESS. ENERGY COST COST �. �. UTILITY BILLING _ ENERGY COST PER WARTER S.F. ACHES RATE/ACRE S RATE/ACRE S I S RATE/ACRE COST S Lot 11, Block 2, 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 1 183.30 1 1.33/ACRE 1.33.E - Lot 132, Block 2 65,341 1.5000 26.60 • 183.3 274,95 274.95 133/ACRE 2.00 Lot 133, Block 2 5,200 0.1194 26.60 • 183.3 .. 21.89 21.89 133/ACRE 0.16 Lot 27, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 .l IN Lot. 28, Block 2- 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 29, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 133/ACRE 1.33 Lot 30, Block-2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 18330 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 31, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 193.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 32, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 18330 133/ACRE 1.33 Lot 33, Block 2 1 43,560 1.0000 1 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 133/ACRE 1.33 Lot 34, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACRE 1.33 Lot 35, Block 2 43,560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 183.30 183.30 1.33/ACBE 1.33 Lot 36, Block 2 43;560 1.0000 26.60 • 183.3 18330 183.30 1.33/ACRE. 1.33 Lot 1, Block 3 76,240 1.7502 26.60 • 183.3 320.81 ISee below Io (Priv. Lts.) 1 76,240 1.75022 26.60 7.92.7 1,387.38 1,708.19 7.08/ACRE 12.39 Lot 2, Stock 59,662 1.3697 26.60 • 183:3 251.07 ISm-below I (Priv. 'Lts.) 1 59,662 1.3697 26.60 • 792.7 1,085.76 1,336.83 7.08/ACRE 9.70 Lot 3, Block 3 1 45,000 1.0331 26.60 • 183.3 189.37 189.37 1.33/ACRE 1.37 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 9 Energy charge assessed an 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT N0. 574. ALL OF SECTION 3 PEST OF 1.35E EXCEPT COUNTRY HOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE 111REE IPROPERTT I I I I I ILot 4, Block 3 ILot 5, Block 3' ILot 6, Black 3 LILot 7, Block 3 'ILot 8, Block 3 ILot 9, Block 3 (lot 111-03 (Lot. 141-03 ILot 142-03 ILot 15, Black 4 ILot 062-04 1 Ilot 171-04 ILot 191-04 1 ILot 1, Block 5 ILot 2, Block 5 AREA. I I I S.F. 5 YEAR ASSESSMENT ENERGY COST I I I ACRES IRATE/ACRE - f (INSTALLATION COST I I I I I I I I I I IRATE/ACRE t I I TOTAL ASSESS. I COST I I I I f I -1 I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 I I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 1.37 I I 183.3 189.37 I 169.37 I I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 I 1.33/ACRE I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I 45,6DD 1.0331 I 26.60 I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I 45,000 1.0331 I 26.60 A 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 45,000 1.0331 I. 26.60 I 183.3 189.37 I 189.37 I I 90,000 2.0661 I 26.60 I 183.3 378.72 I 378.72 I 67,896 1.5587 I 26.60 •' I 183.3 285.71 I 285.71 I 67,896 1.5587 I 26.60 I 183.3 285.71 I I 285.71 I I I I 87,178 I 2.0013 I 26.60 I 53.23 I 163.3 I 366.84 I I 420.07 I I I I 145,700 I 3.3448 I 26.60 88.97 I 183.3 613.10 I I 702.07 I I I I 130,677 I 2.9999 I 26.60 I 79.8 I 183.3 549.88 I 629.68 I 564,512 12.5003 I 26.60 I 183.3 2,291.30 I I 2,291.30 I I I I 435,600 I 10.0000 I 26.60 I I 183.3 1,833.60 I 1,833.06 I I 217,800 5.0000 I 26.60 I 183.3 916.50 I 916.50 • Energy charge Nlll be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 9 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessaent Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PLIRPOSES ONLY 1989 I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I IENERGT COST PER QUARTER I I I RATE/ACRE COST f I I I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I i 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 I I 1.33/ACRE 1.37 1 I 1.33/ACRE 1.31 I I 1.33/ACRE 2.75 I I 1.33/ACRE 2.07 I 1 1.33/ACRE 2.07 I 1:33/ACRE R I 1.33/ACRE I f I 1.33/ACRE I B I 1.33/ACHE 16.63 I 1.33/ACRE I 13.30 I 1.33/ACRE 6.65 I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION'3 NEST OF 1-35E ERCEPT COUNTRY'HOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE FOUR PROPERTY AREA 5 YEAR IIMS7ALLATION COST I- TOTAL ASSESSMENT ASSESS ENERGY COST COST S.F. ACRES RATE/ACRE S IRATEIACRE S I S • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. R Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment -Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILI",BILLING _ ENERGY COST PER QUARTER RATE/ACRE COST S Lot 3, 'Block 5 211,832 4;8630 1 26.60 • 183.3 891.39 891.39 ^ Lot 4, .Block 5 99,612 2.2868 26.60 • 183.3 419.17 419.17 1.60 Lot 5, Black 5 75,640 -1.7365 26.60 • 183.3 318.30 318.30 _ Lot 6, Block 5 95,832 -2.2000 .26.60 183.3 403.26 403.26 Lot 7, Block 5 f 95;832 2.2060 .26.60 ' �, 183.3 403.26 403.26 Lot 8, Block.5 93,412 2.1444 26.60 57-04 1 183.3 393.07 450.11 Lot 9, Block 5 76,673 1.7602 26.60 46.82 183.3. 322.64 369.46 Lot 10, Block 5 79;368 1.8220 26.60 48,.47 183.3 333:97 382.44 Lot 11, Block 5 76,673 1.7602 26.60 46.82 183.3 322.64 369.46 Lot 121-05 1 52,492 1.2051 26.60 • 183.3 220.89 220.89 Lot 201-05 1 170,292 3.9094 26.60 • 183.3 716.59 716.59 Lot 236rD5 240,828 5.7123 26.60 • 183.3 1,047.06 1,047;06 Lot 15, Block 5 208;500 4.7865 26.60 4 183.3 877.37 877.37 blot 1. Block 6 33,480 0.7686 26.60 20.44 183.3. 140.88 161.32 Lot 2, 'Block 6 122,347 2.8087 26.60 74.71 1833 514.83 589.54 Lot 3, Block 6 101,887 23390 -26.60 62.22 183.3 428.74 490.96 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. R Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment -Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILI",BILLING _ ENERGY COST PER QUARTER RATE/ACRE COST S 1.33/ACRE 6.47 133/ACRE 3.04 1.33/ACRE. 2.31 1.33/ACRE 2.93 1:33/ACRE 2.93 �. 1.33/ACRE B �. 1.33/ACRE 0 �. 1.33/ACRE B 1.33/ACRE B J 1.33/ACRE 1.60 1.33/ACRE 5.20 1.33/ACRE 7.60 1.33/ACRE 6.37 1:33/ACRE 1.33/ACRE 0 1.33/ACRE B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY HOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE FIVE • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILITY BILLING ENERGY COST PER BUARTER RATE/IICRE [OST f 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACHE PROPERTY AREA 4 5 YEAR 0 IINSTALLATION.CGST TOTAL 1.33/ACRE 3.70 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 'ASSESSMENT 1.33/ACRE 3.74 1.33/ACRE ASSESS. 1.33/ACRE ' I 3.66 ( ENERGY COST COST S.F. ACRES RATE/ACRE f RATE/ACRE f f 1 �- 1 Lot 4, Block 6 131,440 3.0174 26.60 80.26 183.3 553.09 633.35 �I blot 5. Block 6 84,112 1.9309 26.60 5136 183.3 353.93 405.29 Lot 14,Block 7 23,767 0.5456 26.60 14.51 183.3 100.01 114.52 Lot 2,. Block 7 62;620 1.4376 26.60 38.24 183.3 263.51 301.75 lot 3. Block 7 39,060 0.8967 26.60 23.85 183.3 164.37 188.22 Lot 4, Block 7 117,387 2.6948 26.60 • 183.3 493.96 493.96 Lot 5, Block 7 121,107 2.7882 26.60 • 183.3 509.61 509.61 Lot 6, Block 7 120,000 2.7548 26.60 • 183.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 7, Block 7 120,000 2.7568 26.60 • 183.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 8, Block 7 122,552 2.8134 26.60 • 183.3 515.70 515.70 Lot 9, Block 7 121.600 2.7916 26.60 • 181.3 511.70 511.70 blot 10, Block 7 120,000 2.7548 26.60 • 193.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 11, Block 7 120,0110 2.7548 26.60 • 183.3 504.95 504.95 Lot 12, Block 7 120,000 2.7548 26.60 1 183.3 504.95 504.95 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY 1989 JUTILITY BILLING ENERGY COST PER BUARTER RATE/IICRE [OST f 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACRE 1.33/ACHE IF 1:33/ACRE 4 1.33/ACRE 0 1.33/ACRE 3.58 1.33/ACRE 3.70 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.74 1.33/ACRE 3.71 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.66 1.33/ACRE 3.66 PRELIMINARY _ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGNTING PROJECT N0. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1.35E EXCEPT COUNTRY NOME NEIGNTS_ADDITION PAGE SIX IPROPERT7 I I I I I I I I I I I AREA S.F. 1 5 YEAR ASSESSMENT I ENERGY COST I I I ACRES IRATE/ACRE I t IINSTALLATION COST I I I I I I I I I I I IRATE/ACRE S I I I TOTAL I ASSESS: COST ! I I I ! I 11-07 I 184,967 4.2463 I 26.60' • 1 183.3 778.35 I 778.35 I (' j- ILot 141-07 I 144,667 3.3211 I ,26.60 • ! 183.3 608.76 I 608.76 1 ILot 151-07 1 141,980 3.2594 I 26.60 86.7 1- 183.3 597.45 1 684.15 1 ILot 171-07 1 174,427 4.0043 I 26.66 1 183.3 733.99 1 733.99 1 [Lot 1, Block 8 1 143,014 3.2831 ) 26:60 8733 1 183.3 601.79 ! 689.12 [ flot 2. Black 8 I 106,433 2.4434 1 26.60 64.99 1 1833 447.88 1 512.87 1 ILot 3, Block 8 I 95,015 .2:1812 1 26.60 MR I '183.3 399.81 1 457.83 [ ILot 4, Block 8 I 91,760 2.1065 ) 26.60 56.03 1 183.3 386.12 I 442.15 1 ILot 5, Block 8 I 69,280 2.0496 [ 26.60 54.52 1 183.3 375.69 I 430.21 1 Ioutlot 1 I 78,120 1.7934 1 26.60 I 183.3 I 328.73 I I 328.73 I I I IEAGANDALE 1NDUSTRIAL,PARK 97 I I I I I I I ILot I 1, Bl ock,`1 1 .91,050 i 2.0902 I 26.60 • I I 183.3 I 383.13 ! 383.13 ! ILot 2, Block 1 1 296,392 6.8042 I 26.60 • 1 183.3 1,247.21 1 1,247:21 !Lot 031, Block 1 1 256,540 5.8893 I 26.60 I 183.3 1,079.51 I 1,079.51 ILot I 4, Block 1 I I 298,353 (1) 6.8492 1 I 26.60 1 183.3 I 1,255.46 1 I 1,255.46 (1) Includes area of Tract A, RLS X47 • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for. these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed.on 5 Year Assessment Plan for these urdeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES GILT I 1989 I 1 I I IUTILITT BILLING I 1 IENERGY COST PER QUARTER I I I I RATE/ACRE COST ,S I I I I 1.33/ACRE 5.65.1 I 1:33/ACRE 4.42 I 1.33/ACRE / 1 1.33/ACRE 5.33 I I 1 1.331ACRE I 0 I I 1.33/ACRE / 1 I 1.33/ACRE 0 ! 1 1.33/ACRE I I 1.33/ACRE 0 1 1.33/ACRE I 2.39 I I I 1.33/ACRE I 2.78 1 1 1.33/ACRE 9.05 1 I 1.33/ACRE 7.83 1 1 1.33/ACRE I 9.11 I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGNTING PROJECT N0. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY NOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE SEVEN ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY IPROPERTY I AREA I 5 YEAR (INSTALLATION COST 1 TOTAL I 1 1969 I ASSESSMENT I I ASSESS. I 1 I I ENERGY COSI COST I I I I I I I I IUi1LITT BALING 1 I I I 1 I (ENERGY LOST PER WIIRTER 1 I I I I I 1 1 S.F. ACRES IRATE/ACRE S IRATE/ACRE S I S 1 I RATE/ACRE COST S 1 1 1, 1 IEAGANDALE INDUSTRIAL PARK #8 C;��ILot 021, Block 1 I 174,255 4..0003 I 26.60 106.41 I 1833 733:25 1 039.66 1 1 1.33/ACRE B B (1-ot 022, stock 1 1 435,328 9.9930 1 26.60 265.84 1 183:1 1,831.86 1 2,097:70 I 1 133/ACRE. ILot 3, Block 1 I. 224,363 5.7307 1 26.60 136.48 I 183-.3 940.46 I 1,076.94 I 1 1.33/ACRE B ILot 4, Block 1 1 140,085 3.2159 1 26.60 85.54 I 183.3 589.41 1 674.01 I 1 1.33/ACRE B I IEAGNNDALE OFFICE PARK ILot 1, Block 7 1 100,050 2.2968 1 26.60 1 183.3 421.00 1 421.00 I 1 1.33/ACRE 3.05 ILot 1, Block 2 I 95,910 2.2018 1 26.60 58.57 I I 183.3 403:59 1 462.16 1, I I I 1.33/ACRE 1 .# I I ILot 1, Block 3 1 201,566 I 4.6732 1 26.60 1 856.60 ISee below I 1 33.09 I(Priv: Lights) I '203,566 4.6732 ( 26:60 I 792.7 3,704.45 1 4,561.05 1 1 7.08/ACRE ILot 2, stock 3 1 215,960 4.9578 1 26.60 1 ISM 90a.76 ISee below I 1 7.08/ACRE 35.10 I(Priv. Lights) 1 215,960 4.9578 1 26.60 I 792.7 3,930:05 1 4,838:81 I 1 6.91/ACRE 34.26 ILot 3, Block 3 1 244,301 S.6084 I 26.60 1 183.3 1,029.02 ISee below 1 1 39.71 I(Priv. Lights) I 1 244,301 I 5.6084 1 1 26.60 I I 792.7 4,445.78 I 5,473.80 1 I I 1 7.08/ACRE I • Energy charge will he bitted quarterly -for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 YearAssessmentPlan for these undeveloped lots. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT MOLL SUMMARY STREEILIGHTING PROJECY NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF I -35E EXCEPT COUNTRY NOME HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE EIGHT (PROPERTY I AREA I 5 YEAR (INSTALLATION COST I TOTAL I ASSESSMENT I I ASSESS. 'I ENERGY COST I I COST I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S.F. ACRES IRATE/ACRE f IRATE/ACRE S • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan For these urdeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY I 1989 I I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I (ENERGY COST PER I IEAGANDALEOFFICE PARK 29D I I I I I 11 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I I (Lot 7, Black 1 I 294,812 6.7680 I 26.60 180.03 I 183.3 1,21037 I. 1,420L60 I (lot 1, Block 2 I 105,029 2.4111 I 26.60 64.14 I 183.3 441.95 I 506.09 I ILot 2, Block 2 I 257,831 5.9190 I 26.60 I 153.3 1,084.95 I 1,084.95 ILot 3, Block 2 I 242,878 5.5757 I 26.66 148.31 I 183.3 1,,022.03 I 1,170,34 ILot 4, Black 2 I 253,424 5.8778 I 26.60 156.35 I 183.3 1,077.40 I 1,233.75 I IEAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 3RD I I I I ILot 1, Block 1 I 476,902 10.9482 I 26.60 I 183.3 2,006.81 I 2,006.81 I ILot 2; Black 1 I 203;333 4.6679 I 26.60 124.17 I 183.3 855.63 I 970.80 I ILot 3, Black 1 I 331,433. I 7:6087 I I 26;60. 202239'( I 183.3 1,394'.67 I I 1,597.06 I I I IEAGANDALE OFFICE PARK ATH I I I I I I I I I ILot 1, Block 1 I 220,746 I 5.0676 I 26.60 I 183.3 928.89 I 928.89 I ILot 2, Block 1 I 72,794 I I 1.6711 I I 26.60 44.45 I I 183.3 306.31 I I 350.76 I I • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5 Year Assessment Plan For these urdeveloped lots. ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY I 1989 I I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I (ENERGY COST PER WARIER I I I RATE/ACRE I COST t I I � I I 1.33/ACRE I I 11 I I 1.33/ACRE 0 I I 1.33/ACRE 7.871 I 1.33/ACRE 0 I I 1.33/ACRE I 0 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE I I 14.56 I I 1.33/ACRE 0 I I 1.33/ACRE I 0 I I I I I 1.33/ACRE � I 6.74 I I 1.33/ACRE I R I I PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT. ROLL SUMMARY STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ALL OF SECTION 3 NEST OF 1-35E EXCEPT COUNTRY HOME_ HEIGHTS ADDITION PAGE NINE ESTIMATE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY IPROPERTY I AREA I 5 YEAR IINSTALLATION COST I TOTAL I I. 1989 I I I .ASSESSMENT I I ASSESS. I I I I ENERGY COST I I COST I I I I I I (UTILITY BILLING I I I I I I I I (ENERGY COST PER QUARTER I I I I S.F. I ACRES IRATE/ACRE I f IRATE/ACRE I I f I I I f I I I I RATE/ACNE I LUST f I IEAGANDALE CENTER 1S1 ADDITION I I I I I I I I ILot 1, Block 1 I I 163,097 3.7552 I 26.60 I 183.3 686.33 I 686.33 I I 1.33/ACRE 4.99 I (Lot'2, Block 1 I 174,151 3.980 I 26.60 106.35 I 183.3 732.83 I '839.18 I I 1:33/ACRE B"I d I I I I I I 1 (SECTION 3 I I I I I I I I I IPARCEL 010-02 I I 432;761 I 9.9348 I 26.60 I 264.27 I 183.3 1,821.05 I 2,085.32 ( I 1.33/ACRE B IPARCEL 010-03 I 82,615 1.99661 26.60 I 183.3 347.65 I 347.65 I I 1:33/ACRE 2.52 I IPARCEL 020-03 I 128,960 2.9605 I 26.60 I 183.3" 542:66 I 542.66 I I. 1.33/ACRE 3.94 I IPARCEL 010.05 I I 282;928 I 6.4951 I I 26.60 172.77 I 183.3 I 1,790.55 I I 1,363.32 I I I 1.33/ACRE I I B I I I (REGISTERED LAND I SURVEY 047 I I F I I I I I I . I I I I ITract "C" I I" 59,297 I 1.3613 I 26.60 I 36.21 I 183.3 249.53 I 285.74 I I 1.33/ACNE (TOTAL I 355.8444 I 3516.14 I 25043 76412.4 I 79927.5 I I • Energy charge will be billed quarterly for these developed lots. 0 Energy charge assessed on 5. Year Assessment Plan for these undeveloped lots. STREETLIGHTING PROJECT N0. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA 8 STREETLIGHT LOCATION N.W. 1/4 SEC. 3, T 27 , R 23 ORTATION RIGHT __ ITRANSP OF . :: ElAREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION I I �• ORTATION RIGHT __ ITRANSP OF . :: ElAREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION STREETLIGHTIN„ PROJECT NO. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA d STREETLIGHT LOCATION S.W. 1 /4 SEC. 3, T 27 9 R 23 191- 4 L t-- L� AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR P ND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS 041.07 . �• r:"'/Q.'':;:' .,. :'r�;•p''\ i rtw. .; ` I :'••+..,t�n;.t.}�..;'t.:,�.::;:}, 0117-07 •i.}:::.}:}•::.., 2 :•:f .. 7 ........I ............ 191- 4 L t-- L� AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR P ND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA d STREETLIGHT LOCATION N. E. 1/4 SEC. 3, T 27, R 23 MINNESOTA DEP ARTN�ENT 4RANSPURTATION RIGIiT OF WAY Pl f1T N0. 19=33 010-05 T: 3s :.:.. it I . :6 5 :o :: • �' `� �•:'. •:•::•:::::: � :tii� iiitii::iiit;::littii... •:::: t. J 10.0 , j ti tint°: 4 Oj °iiEiif.^ :•: � :•. • :iii: .:;:E:i: • :. •. O:. '•:::;. .:iiitiiiiii�,iiiiio.'°i�;i"iii°:itiiiit?:iiEiE� ::� .....::::• -5: ii' 1 ii::....... �3f1W :i�s`:i.W�. I• 00 : 0 d Eta„EEF� •i ci"•':i 010-02 7 •iiii 0 .y i J •�•• ••010-03 : � 020-03`: ��a .......... ....,,'...... i:i iiijsii;;��:1•.�,i3iiiiiii 2 ....: iii ::• it' _ `isiii itii.....:i ,,e • F `lr''.. M. AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED,FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS 0 PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION r•\ •'F:iiii NN :- •i':ii':::::. II ki. �•��itii : 0 d Eta„EEF� •i ci"•':i 010-02 7 •iiii 0 .y i J •�•• ••010-03 : � 020-03`: ��a .......... ....,,'...... i:i iiijsii;;��:1•.�,i3iiiiiii 2 ....: iii ::• it' _ `isiii itii.....:i ,,e • F `lr''.. M. AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS ® AREA TO BE ASSESSED,FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE STREETLIGHTS 0 PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOCATION -01 12 -.1 - 1 STREETLIGHTING PROJECT NO. 574 ASSESSMENT AREA & STREETLIGHT LOCATION S.E. 1/4 SEC. 39 10279 R 23 [lilt . ......... ...... . .... .... 0-07 ;Xv. A, .................. 1 0^71 I..� . ...... ........ . .. .. .. ............. ........ ...... ..... .. ... I . . ..... 'V .......` 141- 07 iiiii iiiii . ........... ........... Jy ...... ....... 0 1 ..... .. .. ..... ....... zt ... ... . .......... ......... i -m-0 O 4 5 A ........... .......... ....... ...... ....... ......... . .... ....O .......... .:iii i ii .... ............ ... .. ...... MMil .. . ........ . O ................. ..... ..iii I -A - il-tiniiiii. ...... ........ . ...... vo Me. Z:I. ... ......... ..3 . ... ... • r"i ...: ... .....%9N ....... . me ......... m..r. -'m .......... am— .. .... ..... ....... ....... .. .... . .... .............. ...... .... .... . .... V10 "o ........ ..... ....... ....... . % nw; "CE pore Al A, 2 4 '.10... .. ....... 1;1 - I I . . . .. I. ff AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOC TION 4:7-� 14 4 FOND 1;1 - I I . . . .. I. ff AREA TO BE ASSESSED FOR PUBLIC STREETLIGHTS PROPOSED STREETLIGHT LOC TION 4:7-� 14 4 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PROT. 583/PARK CENTER (STS. & UTIL.) E. Project 583, Park Center (Streets and Utilities) --This project provides for the installation of streets and utilities for the proposed Park Center Addition located west of Cliff Lake Drive and north of Cliff Road across from the Drivers Training Facility. On November 9th, the City Council received the Feasibility Report for this project and scheduled a public hearing to be held on December 5th. Enclosed on pagess(� through q Cf is a copy of that report as prepared by the consulting engineering firm of Short -Elliott -Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH). All notices have been sent to, all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. In addition, extensive, discussions have been held with the developer, Federal Land Company. While it has been indicated that the City may receive written comments, pertaining to the proposed allocation of the costs associated with this project, the staff has not received any at this time. When received, they will be forwarded to the Council's attention as soon as possible'for further review. After a formal presentation of the proposed improvements by the consulting engineer, the staff will be available to answer any further questions pertaining to this proposed improvement. It is anticipated that the final plat for this project will be processed at the December 19th meeting. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close thepublic hearing and approve/deny Project 583 (Park Center Addition -Streets and Utilities) and if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications. SS FEASIBILITY STUDY EAGAN, MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT NO. 583 PARK CENTER SEH FILE NO. 90096 OCTOBER 26, 1989' I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that i am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of 'Minnesota. DATE: 10-26-89 REEG, G. NO. 1'5538, REVIEWED BYL ,�T_D •/ l . w,4 71 DATE': /)-77_-&!7 y S( SEN ENGINEERS / ARCNREl75 /PLANNERS 222 EAST. LITTLE CANADA, ROAD,. ST PAUL, MINNESOTA 55117 612494 0272 October 26, 1989 RE': EAGAN, MINNESOTA PARK CENTER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 583 SEH FILE NO. 90096 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan,. MN 55121 ATTN: Thomas Colbert, Director of Public Works Enclosed is our report for the construction of public improvements for Park Center. The proposed improvements are feasible and will benefit the properties served. Estimated costs and a preliminary assessment roll are included in the report'. We will be pleased to meet with you and any interested parties, at your convenience, to. discuss the content of the report. Sincerely, Jim Eulberg, P.E. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional En ineeruunder the laws of the State of Minnesota,. (4W& Jixfi Eulberg, P..E. Date - _8 Reg. No. �5 S Approved by: Aa'-� Dep rtment of Pu i Works SNORT EC107 ,ENDRIC60N INC. -Date: tt ST PAUL, MINNESOTA S7 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WISCONSIN TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE/CERTIFICATION TRANSMITTAL LETTER TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS DISCUSSION EASEMENTS AND PERMITS PROJECT AREA COST ESTIMATES ASSESSMENTS REVENUE'SOURCES PROJECT SCHEDULE APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLE FIGURES 1 LOCATION MPTP 2 PROPOSED 'SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN 3 PROPOSED STORM SEWER, STREETS AND STREET LIGHTS 4 PROPOSED STORM SEWER ASSESSMENT MAP 5 PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 'WATERMAIN AND STREET ASSESSMENT MAP 6 TYPICAL STREET SECTION S-9 SCOPE This project provides for the construction of sanitary sewer watermain, "storm sewer ,and streets to serve the proposed Park Center development (see Drawing No. 1). Included in this project is a large amount of grading for both the pond AP -50 and the street.. The Park Center site is approximately 21.25 acres and is located at the northwest corner of Cliff Road (Co. Rd. 32) and Cliff Lake Road. The area is currently 'zoned PD (Planned Development,). The land to the north of the parcel is City Park the' balance of the adjacent land is currently developed as commercial property or is anticipated to be developed for commercial purposes. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on our study, it is concluded that: 1. The total estimated project cost is 5631,489.00. 2. The project As feasible from an engineering standpoint and will benefit the properties served. 3. The proposed project is in accordance with the City's master street and utility plans. 4:, it is recommended that the project be constructed as proposed herein under a single contract. DISCUSSION Sanitary 'Sewer The sanitary sewer as proposed as, a part of the project is shown on Drawing No. 2. Included are the 8" laterals necessary to serve the parcels together with additional service stubs to serve Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 2, Block 2. Service to Lot 2., Block i will be provided via a stub out of the manhole in the northeast corner of Park Center Drive. Watermain The proposed 6'" and 8" watermain is shown on Drawing No. 2. The watermain consists of a loop running in Park Center Drive with, stubs provided for future looping of service in Lot 2., Block 1. Water service stubs are proposed off the existing watermain to serve both Lot 1, Block l and Lot 1, Block 2. Storm Sewer This project is in the Gun Club Lake Water Management Organization jurisdiction. The easterly 8.4 acres of the this development drains into pond AP -25, located northeast of the development, the westerly 12.8 acres drains into pond AP -50 as indicated on Drawing No. 3. As part of this project, pond AP -50 will be upgraded to include approximately 4 acre feet of wet pond' volume for purposes of nutrient removal. The total volume required per information supplied by the City, is 9.2 acre feet. For purposes of this report., it has been assumed borrow material will be available on site and material removed as a result of the construction of the pond can be disposed of on site. Streets Park Center Drive will provide internal circulation to the Park Center Development. 'The easterly entrance to Cliff Road is proposed to be barricaded and a temporary cul-de-sac there until the County completes its upgrade of Cliff Road (Co..Rd. 32). The westerly entrance of Park Center Drive is proposed to be four lanes in ( 50' ) width, two in and two out to provide for sight turn lanes. The north segment is proposed as two lanes with a third serving as a turn lane (38') and the east segment is proposed as two lanes (;34'). For purposes of this report, it has been assumed that all the select granular fill for the road has to be imported. if suitable material is available on site some savings could be expected. Street Lights The two interior street lights would be the "shoe box" design with 150 watt high pressure sodium luminaire mounted on 18' standard poles. The two street lights at the intersections with 5' - O Cliff Road (Co. Rd. 32) would be conventional intersection street lights with 250 watt high pressure sodium "shoe box" type .fixtures mounted on 30' fiberglass poles with, 6' aluminum mast arms. The energy ,needs for Park Center are serviced by Dakota Electric Association. They offer the type of street lighting poles, lighting fixtures and necessary maintenance service required by the City of Eagan's Street Lighting Policy. Both types of lighting are proposed to be installed by Dakota Electric. EASEMENTS AND PERMITS It is anticipated that all right-of-way and easements will be acquired at no cost to the City. The developer of Park Center will dedicate the necessary right-of-way and easements on the final plat.Additional easement will be required for pipe access to pond AP -25, it is anticipated that it will be acquired as a part of the pond easement description which is currently underway. In addition to normal City permits, other regulatory agency permits anticipated to be necessary includes the following: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Metropolitan Waste Control Commission - Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Minnesota Department of Health - Watermain Extension Permit Dakota County Highway Department Right -of -Way Permit PROJECT AREA The following properties would benefit by this improvement and are proposed to be assessed: After Platting: Current Parcel Numbers for Park -Center Notification Process: Lot 1., Block 1 Lot 2, Block 1 Southeast 1/4, Section '30 Lot 1, Block 2 Parcel 011-76 Lot 2., Block 2 Outlot A COST ESTIMATE ' Detailed cost estimates are presented in Appendix A, located at the back of this report. The cost estimates include contingency and legal, administrative, engineering and bond costs. A summary of these cost is as follows: Street $344,328;00 Sanitary Sewer, 29,143.00 Watermain 53,167.,00 Storm Drain 192,315.00 Street Lights 12,,536,.00 Total Estimated Cost $631.,489.00 - 7 - �D� ASSESSMENTS Assessable costs will be based upon final construction costs plus related overhead expenses, estimated at 30%, or on the comparable zoning equivalent rate as identified in the 1989 Fee Schedule. They will also be based on the dimensions contained in the final plat recorded at Dakota County. This report contains areas based upon information contained in the preliminary plat. It is proposed that the assessment would be spread over 10 years at a rate determined by the bond sale necessary to finance these improvements. Sanitary Sewer Trunk area sanitary sewer has previously been assessed under project 64. Lateral benefit from trunk sewer is proposed to be assessed at the current rate of $15.85 per front foot with a 150 foot corner lot credit being given. All sanitary sewer constructed under this project is considered l;ateial and is proposed to be 100% assessed. It is proposed to assess sanitary sewer on an area basis (excluding ponding areas) to Lots 1 and 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2. Block 2 only. Per the request of the developer, Outlot A is proposed to be excluded from the sanitary sewer lateral assessment. W.+—.,.. a .. Trunk area watermain has previously been assessed under project 127A. Lateral benefit from trunk water has been assessed under project 529 for Cliff Lake Road but it has not been assessed for the existing watermain along south, the Cliff Road side. The 1989 rate for lateral benefit from trunk is currently established at 522.70/front foot. The entire south plat line less the 150 foot corner lot credit is proposed to be assessed for lateral benefit trunk watermain. All watermain constructed under this project is considered lateral and is proposed to be 100% assessed. It is proposed to U3 assess watermain on an area basis (excluding ponding areas) to Lots 1 and 2 Block' 1 and Lots 1 and 2 Block 2 only. Per the request of the developer Outlot A is proposed to be excluded from the watermain assessments. Storm Sewer Trunk area storm sewer is currently pending at the single family rate under project 452R, consequently the parcel is responsible for the incremental difference between single family and commercial. This difference is $0.02.7 per square foot, or $1,176.12 per acre based upon 1989 rates. The outlet from pond AP -50 was constructed as a part of project 452. The equivalent cost of the storm sewer system necessary to provide street drainage would be assessed. as a part of the street assessment. The oversizing cost of that storm sewer system and all other public storm sewer and ponding, costs would be considered 'lateral storm sewer-. Lateral storm sewer is proposed to be assessed on an area basis (excluding the ponding area). Street Rahn Road (Cliff Lake Road') has previously been assessed at the rates appropriate at the time. No assessments have been levied for past improvement to Cliff Road. It is proposed to assess 100$ of the street costs to the development. Included in the street assessment would be street grading, street construction, street_ drainage and street lighting. The street costs are proposed to be assessed on an area basis against Lots rand 2 Block 1 and Lots 1 and 2 Block 2, per the developers request Outlot A is proposed to be excluded from the street assessment. The total cost of the sidewalks would be assessed on an area basis the same as the street assessments. The total cost of the street lights together with the energy costs for five years is proposed to be assessed on an area basis., the same as the street assessment. Trunk Assessments Trunk assessment rates will be assessed on the rates in -effect at the time of the.public hearing. Trunk assessment proposed to be assessedas apart of this project are listed 'below: Storm Sewer Trunk area, = difference between the 1989 Commercial/industrial rate and the single family residential rate. $0.027 per square foot = $1,,176,.12.per acre. Watermain - Lateral.Benefit from Trunk Based upon 1989 rate of S22_70/front foot Sanitary Sewer - Lateral Benefit from Trunk Based upon 1989 rate of $15.85/front foot. REVENUE SOURCES The revenue source to cover the cost of this project is proposed to be direct assessment. The following is a summary of the revenue sources: impact on Trunk Item Project Cost Revenue Funds A Sanitary Sewer Lateral cost $ 29,143 S 29,143 Lateral benefit from trunk 28,652 Total $ 29,143 $ 57,795 +$28;,652 - 10 - (-�eS Impact on Trunk Item Project Cost Revenue Funds B Watermain: Lateral $ 53„167 $ 53,167 Lateral benefit from trunk 25,145 Total S 53.,167 $ 78,312. +$25.;145 C Streets: Street grading $199,290 $19.9,290 Street construction 127,1'8'4 127,184 Sidewalk 17,854 17,854 Street drainage 45,304. 45„304 Street lighting 12,536 12,536 Total $402,16'8 $402,168 -0- D Storm Sewer: Lateral cost $ 50,437 $ 50,437 (-Non Street) Pond construction 96,573 96,574 qrA u ea,(e� Trunk mese 21,170 Total $14.7,011 $168,181 +$21,170 TOTAL PROJECT COST $631,489 $706,455 +S74,967 ( 11 0 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report, 11-9-89 Public Hearing 12-5-89 Approve Plans and Specifications 3-6-90 Open Bids 4-3-90 Award Contract 4-17-90 Construction Begins 5-1-90 Construction Completion (substantial) 8-31-90 Construction Completion (final) 9-15=90 Final Assessment Hearing Sept. 90 First payment due with real estate taxes 5-91 SDI APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE `PARK CENTER UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 583. SANITARY SEWER ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE CY 200 17.00 SANITARY SEWER SUBTOTAL +5.$ CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST A - 1 4� 3.400.00 $21,350.00 1,068.00 $22,418.00 6, 725.,00 $29,143.00 EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER LF 640 15.00 9,600.00 STD. 4" DIA. MANHOLE W/ CASTING (8' DEEP) EACH 3 1,050.00 3,150.00 MH DEPTH GREATER THAN 8' DEEP LF 20 55.00 1,100.00 8"' OUTSIDE DROP LF 10 200.00 2,000.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 1 450.00 450.00 4" PVC SERVICE PIPE LF 85 15.00 1,275.00 8" X 4" SERVICE WYE EACH 1 75.00 75.00 CONNECT 4" SERVICE TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EACH 2 150.00 300.00 ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE CY 200 17.00 SANITARY SEWER SUBTOTAL +5.$ CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST A - 1 4� 3.400.00 $21,350.00 1,068.00 $22,418.00 6, 725.,00 $29,143.00 WATERMAIN A - 2 EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE 8" DIP WATERMAIN LF 350 21.00 7,.350.00 6" DIP WATERMAIN LF 1045 19.00 19,855.00 HYDRANT EACH 2 1,,300.00 2,600.00 8" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE - AND BOX EACH 11 475.00 475.00 6" RESILIENT WEDGE GATE VALVE AND ;BOX EACH 10 350.00 3,.500.00 FITTINGS LB 700 1.60, 1,120.00 CONNECT TO EXISTING 16" WATERMAIN EACH 4 800.00 3,200.00 ROCK STABILIZATION BELOW PIPE CY 50 17.00 850.00 WATERMAIN SUBTOTAL $38,950.00 +'S$ CONTINGENCY 1,948.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $40,898.00 +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. 12,_269..00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $53,1:67.00 A - 2 STORM SEWER DESCRIPTION A. LATERAL - STREET/PRIVA' 12" RCP STORM SEWER 18" RCP STORM SEWER 24" RCP STORM SEWER 36" RCP STORM SEWER 18'" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD 3'6" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD STD. CATCH BASIN W/ CASTING STD. CATCH BASIN W/ CASTING STD. MANHOLE W/CAST.ING B. LATERAL -NON STREET/PUBLIC 12" EST. UNIT TOTAL UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE 30" RCP STORM SEWER LF 320 LF 60 25.00 1,500.00 LF 265 30.00 7•,950.00 LF 70 32.,00 2,240.00 LF 260 45.00 11,700.00 EA 1 500.00 500.00 EA 1 1,100.00 1,100.00 EA 2 950.00 1,900.00 EA 2 1,050.00 2,100..00 EA 4 1,050.00 4,200.00 SUBTOTAL EA 3 $33,190'.00 12" RCP STORM SEWER LF 20 24" RCP STORM SEWER LF 50 30" RCP STORM SEWER LF 320 36" RCP STORM SEWER LF 230 48" RCP 'STORM SEWER LF 60 12" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD EA 1 36" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD EA 1 48" RC FLARED END W/ TRASH GUARD EA 1 STD. CATCH BASIN W'/ CASTING EA 3 ST -D. CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE W/ CASTING EA 2 SUBTOTAL 25.00 500.00 32.00 1,600.00 35.00 11,200.00 45.00 10,350:00 85.00 5,100.00 300.00 300-..00 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,500.00, 1,500.00 1,050.00 3.150.00 1,,050.00 2,100.00 $36,950.00 EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN,. PRICE PRICE C. POND MUCK EXCAVATION, CY 2,000 5.00 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 9,000 3..,28 COMMON BORROW CY 3,000 4,.00 SEED W/TOPSOIL AND MULCH AC 1.8 1,500.00 SPLIT RAIL FENCE LF 300 6.00 RETAINING WALL (KEYSTONE) SF 1,200 12.50 POND SUBTOTAL STORM SEWER SUBTOTAL +5$ CONTINGENCY ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST +30% LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INC. TOTAL ESTIMATED,COST A - 4 10,000.00' 29,250.00 12,000.00 2,700.00 1,800.00 15,.000.00 $ 70,750.00 $140,,890.00 7.0'45.00 $14.7,935.00 44,380.00 S192,, 315, 00 STREETS (100$ CRUSHED) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE(2331) TON EST. UNIT TOTAL DESCRIPTION UNIT QUAN. PRICE PRICE (2341 MOD) MOBILIZATION LS 1 160.00 6,000.00 SUBGRADE,PREPARATION RS 10 100.00 1,000.,00 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 2,000 3.00 6,000.00 TEST ROLLING RS 10 100.00 1,000.00 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW CY 20:,000 7.00 140,000.00 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TON 3,500 7.00 24.,,500.00 (100$ CRUSHED) BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE(2331) TON 1,015 15.00 15,225.00 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TON 435 18.00 7,830.00 (2341 MOD) BITUMINOUS MAT. FOR MIXTURE TON 80 160.00 12,.800•.00 TACK COAT: GAL 200 2.00 400.00 4" CONCRETE WALK W/ GRANULAR BASE SF 6,540 2..00 13,-080.00 B618 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1,920 7.00 13,440.00 WATER FOR DUST CONTROL MGAL 20 .15.00 300.,00 SOD W/ 4" TOPSOIL SY 2.,200 2.90 6,380.00 ADJUST FRAME AND CASTING EACH 10 155.00 1„550.00 ADJUST GATE VALVE BOX EACH 22 125.00 2, 750..00 STREETS $252.,255.00 +5$ CONTINGENCY 12,613.00 ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $264,868.00 +30$ LEGAL, ADMINISTRATIVE, ENGINEERING & BOND INT. 79,460.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $344,328.00 A - 5 �3 STREET LIGHTING Unit Total. Description Unit_ Qty. Price Price 150 W Shoe Box Ea 2 2000.00 $ 4,000.00 Street Light 250 W Shoe Box Ea 2 2000.00 4,000.00 Street Light Subtotal $ 8,000.00 Energy Costs 510.95/light/Mo x 2 lights x 12 mo/yr x 5 yrs =.S 1,314.00 $ 8.90/light/Mo'x 2 lights x 12 mo/yr x 5 yrs = 1,068.,00 Subtotal $ 2,382.00 Street Lights and 5 Year Energy Cost $ 10,382.00 +5% Contingency Estimated Construction Cost +15% Legal, Administrative, Eng. and Bond Interest Estimated Cost TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST A - 6 579.00 10,901.00 1.635.00 $ 12,536.00 $631, 489.00 APPENDIX B PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL PARK CENTER UTILITY AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 583 A. SANITARY'SEWER LATERAL PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA (ACRES) RATE/ACRE PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1; BLOCK 1 0.99 0.99 $2,289.32 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.67 9.87 2,289.32 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 2,289.32 LOT 2,, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 2,289.32 OUTLOT A 6.82 0 2„289.32. 19.55 12.73 B 1 1 ( o TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 2,26'6.42 22,595.56 2,151.96 2,129.66 —6— $29,143.00 B. SANITARY SEWER, - LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK PARCEL PARCEL_ ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA (ACRES') PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1„ BLOCK' 1 0-99 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.87 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0::94 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 OA9 OUTLOT A 6.8.2 19.55 -0_99 9.87 0..94 0..93 0 12.73 B - 2 ASSESSMENT RATE/ACRE $2,250.77 '2„250.77 2,250.17 :2,250.77 2,250.77 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 2,228.27' 22,2'15.14 2,115.73 2j 093.22 -0- S28..652.36 C. WATERMAIN,LATERAL PARCEL PARCEL DESCRIPTION AREA PARK CENTER PLAT: ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TOTAL AREA (ACRES) RATE/ACRE ASSESSMENT LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 0.99 $4,176.51 $ 4,134.75 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.67 9.87 4,176.51 41,222.17 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 4,176.51 3,925.92 LOT 2,, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 4,176.51 3,884.16 OUTLOT A 6.82 0 4,176.51 -0- 19.55' 12.75 $53,167.00 B - 3 1$ D. WATERMAIN -LATERAL BENEFIT FROM TRUNK PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT' DESCRIPTION AREA AREA,('ACRES) PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.87 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 0.93 OUTLOT A 6.82. 19.55, 0.99 '9.87 0.94 0.93 0 12.73 B - 4 ASSESSMENT RATE/ACRE $1,995.27 1,975.27 1,975.27 1,975.27 1,975.27 TOTAL ASSESSMENT S 1,955.52 19,495.9.6 1.856.76 1,837.00 -0- $25,145.24 E. STREET PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA (ACRES) RATE/ACRE LOT 1:, BLOCK 1, 0.99 0.99. 31,592:.14 LOT 2, BLOCK '1 9.87 9,.87 31,592.14 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 31,592.14 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 31,592.14 OUTLOT A 6.82 0 19.55 12.73 a B — 5 10 TOTAL ASSESSMENT $ 311.276.22 311,.814.47 29,696-62 29,380.69 —0- $402,168.00 F. :STORM SEWER LATERAL PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AREA AREA*(ACRES) PARK CENTER PLAT: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 LOT 2., BLOCK 1 9.87 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 LOT 2,, BLOCK 2 0.93 OUTLOT. A 6.82 19.55 *Excludes ponding area. 0.99 9.87 0.94 0.93 5.27 18.00 Acre 4SSESSMENT TOTAL RATE/ACRE ASSESSMENT $8,167.28 $ 8,085.61 8,167.,28 80,611.03 8,167.28 7,677.34 8,167.28 7,595.57 8,167.28 43,041.55 $147,011.,00 G. STORM SEWER TRUNK BLOCK 1 PARCEL PARCEL ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DESCRZPTION AREA AREA*(ACRES) RATE/ACRE PARK CENTERPLAT`: LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.99 0.99 $1,176.12 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 9.87 9.87 1,176.12 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 0.94 0.94 1,176.12 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 0.93 0.93 1,,1.76.12 OUTLOT A, 6.82 5.27 1„376:..12 18.00 Acre *Excludes ponding area. B - 7 -TOTAL ASSESSMENT. $ 1,164.36 11,608..30 1,105.55 1,093.79 6.198.18 $21,170.15 is PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT SUMMARY PROJECT #583 PARK CENTER PARCEL DESCRIPTION PARK CENTERPARK CENTER PARK CENTER PARR CENTER PARK CTR. TOTAL (ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT TYPES LOT 1 BLK 1 LOT 2 BLK 1 ILOT 1 BLK 2 LOT 2, BLK 2 JOUTLOT A A. SANITARY SEWER $ 2,266.42 $ 22,5.95.56 $ 2,151.96 $ 2,129.06 -0- $ 29,143.60 LATERAL B. SANITARY SEWER 2;228.27 22,215.14 2,115.73 2,093.22 -0- 28,652.36 TRUNK BENEFIT LAT. C. WATERMAIN LATERAL 4,134.75 41,222.17 3,925.92 3,884.16 -0- 53,167.00 Do D. WATERMA•IN TRUNK 1,.955.52 19,495.96 1,856,76 1,831.00 -0- 25,145.24 Vi BENEFIT LATERAL E. STREET 31,276.22 311,814.47 29,696.62 29,380.69 -0- 402,168.00 F. STORM SEWER LAT. 8,085.61 80,611.03 7,677.24 7,595.57 43,041.55 147,011.00 G. STORM SEWER TRUNK Vp ? ra de 1,164.36 11,608.30 1,105.55 1,093.79 6,198.15 21,170.15 TOTAL $51,111.15 $509,562.63 $48,529.78 $48,013.49 $49,.239.70 $706,.456.75 is , IIHU wa[w TOR ®� I AANH PARK , V PARK CENTER P. O U T LOT A i I B L O C K I [; C%a[f PARK [XO AUU I I CI IH TAKE CkNIXk T1_ II / LUT2 LOT I I i I 1 I /rte •� LUT I ' 41 e B L O K 2 Jyl I I�' ..__. CLIfFBQAQ. .-csen:u- - L LEGEND RIEXOTWO Enomm STATE OF 4N I UAKOG COUNTY PI AI ., Ir 11TO/W tEWEAI- SiRccT SAWTARY UVM 0F. WATERMAN ti4 PARK CENTER- PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER 2 ASO EAGAN. MINNESOTA AND WATERMAIN F, ME B -�. PROJ. NO. 583 0 �IIIF1� 111 �•- � I.YYI �1. 111 ruu .-1111 FL4 FEWE99E MLN Fuc[ IF Elea R6YD>m MED _.. ;t.fF NGAD _ L...:• A p III .. LEGEND A' ■1 TWO PROPOSED SIDEWALK ............... I ilAll UY MN I STORY SEWER _�_ ---0 --- 40-- I .STREET SAMTARY SEWER STREET LIGHT rrraw •II[rnrnlwArLM D 0 Idll(1 IA 1,(IIIN I 1 I9 Al I I PROPOSED STORM SEWER AND STREETS 10(19169 3 v .MIME m CEDAR CLEF tot a COMMERCIAL PARK ]ND ADD WT I CENTER ..... .... .... .... .. . ..... . ..... ..... ..... ...... SD CLjfF ROAD =-STIMATED ASSESSMENT RATES STATE OF UN -ATERAL STORM DRAIN $8.167 / ACRE RAHN PARK ASSESSABLE AREA 2bi II 1 i I CLIFF LAKE CENTRE III L--- — I — I I F DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT It id PARK CENTER ASSESSMENT AREAS 90006 4 "a EAGAN, MINNESOTA AND ESTIMATED RATES tottEnE 6 PROJ. NO. 583 0 U T L 0 T A W�A �Q CEDAR CLIFF LOT i COMMERCIAL _ PARK ]ND ADD LOT CENTER C IEF ROAD ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT RATES STATE OF MH STREET 531.592 / ACRE LATERAL SANITARY SEWER $2.209 / ACRE LATERAL WATERMAIN $4,177 / ACRE ASSESSABLE AREApow RANN PARK DAKOTA COUNTY PLAT P1 ' I� i I: I• . I j PARK CENTER Age" � EAGAN, MINNESOTA I CLIFF LAR NT ! CENTRE I: ASSESSMENT AREAS 000: T SII T5� 66' O R/W R/W 60' C N eQ 50, A II�QB 38: B 9' C 34 i EX. GRD. 1 PARK CENTER DRIVE 1 ;14 I, EX. GRD. B618 C 9 0(-TYP.) /0 3qr >r- 0 r 2 z°1o_ O �D r - L %C CONC. SIDEWALK • 4��TOPSOIL .BORROW �{ �I(TYP.) -Z Q m 6°GRANULAR BASE 0 Z m —1 I/L" 2341 BIT. WEAR COURSE TACK COAT 00Ill(1) L31/2"233,1 BIT. BASE COURSE Fra mn 10"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE000%CRUSHED) .. .COMPACTED SUBGRADE(100% STANDARD PROCTOR) Z WEST SEGMENT OF PARK CENTER DRIVE ® NORTH SEGMENT OF PARK CENTER DRIVE Z co © EAST SEGMENT OF PARK CENTER DRIVE co o �o Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PROT 578/SIBLEY TERMINAL IND. PK.(STORM SEWER) F. Project 578, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Storm Sewer) --This project provides for the installation of storm sewer lateral facilities within the Sibley Terminal Industrial Park necessary to handle existing and proposed future development and expansion of existing businesses within this drainage district. In response to a. petition received from one of the property owners combined with concerns expressed by the MWCC regarding severe erosion undermining a trunk sewer interceptor, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report which was presented at the Council meeting of November 9th with the public hearing being scheduled for .December 5th. Enclosed on pages C\, I through _�� is a copy of the feasibility report for the Council's information and review during the presentation to be provided by the consulting engineer, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, Inc. who prepared the report. At the conclusion of the presentation, the staff will be available to address any comments or concerns regarding this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To close the public hearing and approve/deny Project 578 (Sibley Terminal. Industrial Park -Storm Sewer) and, if approved, authorize the preparation of detailed plans and specifications along with easement acquisition through condemnation if necessary. (�6 Report for Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 578 Eagan, Minnesota October 1989 File No. 49499 October 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 578 Our File No. 49499 Dear Mayor and Council: Km A. Gwoon, P.E. Rehab W. Fewer. P.E. Donakl C. BurgaO. R.E. Jerry A Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanan, RE. Ted K. Fk . P.E. Mrcnaer T Raurmann R.E. Roden R, Pkderk, P.E. D" 0 loskora. RE. Thomas W Reierson. R.E. MKhael C. Lynch. RE James R. Maland. R.E. KenneM P. Anderson. P.E. Reim A Bachmann, PE. Mark R. Rook R.E. Roden C. Russek. AI,A Thomas E, Argus. PE Howard A Sanford, P.E. Dan,el J Edgerton. P.E. Mark A. Seip RE, Philp J Casty 11. PE Mark D wallls. RE. ThomasR Anderson. AlA Gary F Rylander RE. Charles A, Erickson Leo M R elsky Haran M Olson Susan M Enerhn. C PA Transmitted herewith is our report for Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Respectfully submitted, BONES R00, R ENE ANDERL�IK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. MAH:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered ofessional E gineer under the laws of the State ;r esot . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. QDate: October 2 1989 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: IM iJ�A r epartment of Pub Works Date: RPT49499 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSJ13 • 612-636-4600 Z Bonestroo Ono G. Bomar oo. PE. Roden W Rosen P.E. Joseph C. Anoedik P.E. / Rosene Branford A. lender¢ RE. R[hard E. Turner, P.E. Anderlik & JamesC Glenn R. Cool,. P.E.E. Thomas E. Noyes. PE. Associates RoWn G. SchunchL RE. Macon L- Sonata. RE. Engineers & Architects October 12, 1989 Honorable Mayor and Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements Project No. 578 Our File No. 49499 Dear Mayor and Council: Km A. Gwoon, P.E. Rehab W. Fewer. P.E. Donakl C. BurgaO. R.E. Jerry A Bourdon. P.E. Mark A. Hanan, RE. Ted K. Fk . P.E. Mrcnaer T Raurmann R.E. Roden R, Pkderk, P.E. D" 0 loskora. RE. Thomas W Reierson. R.E. MKhael C. Lynch. RE James R. Maland. R.E. KenneM P. Anderson. P.E. Reim A Bachmann, PE. Mark R. Rook R.E. Roden C. Russek. AI,A Thomas E, Argus. PE Howard A Sanford, P.E. Dan,el J Edgerton. P.E. Mark A. Seip RE, Philp J Casty 11. PE Mark D wallls. RE. ThomasR Anderson. AlA Gary F Rylander RE. Charles A, Erickson Leo M R elsky Haran M Olson Susan M Enerhn. C PA Transmitted herewith is our report for Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Sewer Improvements. Also included is a preliminary cost estimate and assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss this report. Respectfully submitted, BONES R00, R ENE ANDERL�IK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson, P.E. MAH:kf I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered ofessional E gineer under the laws of the State ;r esot . Mark A. Hanson, P.E. QDate: October 2 1989 Reg. No. 14260 Approved by: IM iJ�A r epartment of Pub Works Date: RPT49499 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, Minnesota SSJ13 • 612-636-4600 Z SCOPE': This project provides ,for the construction of additional storm sever to serve Sibley Terminal Industrial Park (Lots 1-5, Block 1, Lots, 1, 2, Block 2). Sibley Terminal Industrial Park is located westerly of T.H. No. 13 at the northerly end of Terminal Drive. This project is required at this time due to the proposed development of Hartman"s Office/Warehouse and the expan- sion of Safety Rleen, Inc. In addition, when the undeveloped land in the area develops, adequate storm sewer will be available to serve these developments. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the Master Utility and Street Plans for the City of Eagan. The project as outlined herein can best be carried out as one contract. DISCUSSION: The affected drainage area is shown on Figure No. 1 attached to the back of this report. The existing storm sewer which presently serves this area includes approximately 450' of 12• pipe constructed in 1970 which conveys storm water from the low point in Terminal Drive westerly. At its discharge, storm water is conveyed overland approximately 800' to Pond CP-8.. The drain- age area tributary to the existing storm sewer is 22.3 acres- Presently the existing drainage area is 20Z developed. Storm sewer proposed herein is required for the following reasons: A. The existing 12' storm sever is capable of conveying, 3-4 cubic feet per second (cfs). Based on present design standards for a 5 year event storm assuming overland drainage exists, the storm sewer should be designed to convey 70 cfa. As a result, the existing storm sewer is grossly undersized based on the drainage area tributary to it. The storm sever has functioned reasonably well because the drainage area tributary to it is not fully developed. RPT49499 Page 1. 93 B. The overland drainage from the discharge point of the existing 12" storm sever to Pond CP -8 has created two major washouts and caused significant erosion into Pond CP -8. In addition, the washout areas are located near a major 42" MWCC trunk sever which in a short time may be impacted'by the erosion. The NWCC has notified the 'City and is very concerned about the erosion. In addition, the inlet capacity of the existing, storm sever in Terminal Drive is not adequate. There- fore, additional storm sever must be extended to Pond CP -8 and from the low point in Terminal Drive to properly serve the undeveloped and developed land. C. The location of the existing 12" storm sever is an the common lot line between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1. Presently, Lot 3 is proposed to be subdivided which would combine the southerly half to Lot 4 and the northerly half to Lot 2. Therefore, the existing storm sever will no longer be located on a common lot line and may be impacted by the future development of Lot 4. Storm sever proposed herein is shown on Figure No.. 1 located at the back of this report. Basically, it is proposed to construct a 481, 36" and 30" storm sever from Pond CP -8 to Terminal Drive. The washed out areas will be filled and graded smooth. it is anticipated that some of the fill material will be excavated from the Pond CP -8 where it :has eroded too. Ditch blocks will be constructed near the NWCC trunk sever to collect overland runoff from Lots 4 and 5. Block 1, It is,proposed to construct the storm sever along the new common lot line subdividing Lot 3. In addition, it is proposed to extend new storm sewer in Terminal Drive to properly collect storm water runoff from the developed and undeveloped land along Terminal Drive. Page 2. RPT49499 Pond CP -8 which presently receives, runoff from this drainage area and others outlet through a 66•,CMP beneath the railroad tracks into Pond CP -9. Pond CP -9 is located in Fort Snelling State Park. Due to the interest in water quality, it may be desirable in the future to construct a two stage outlet for Pond CP -8 to improve the storm water discharge, and water quality into Pond CP -B. The other concern relative to Pond CP -8 is that the existing 549 storm sewer which discharges into it, discharges approximately 12" below the normal water:level (NWL) of Pond CP. -8:. The City in the near future may want to reconstruct the 54, RCP to allow it to discharge at the NWL. EASEMENTS/PERMITS: Permanent drainage and utility easements are required to construct the,storm sewer across Lots 3 and 4,. Block 1. In addition temporary construction easements may be required for the construction of storm sewer adjacent to Terminal Drive. The estimated permanent drainage and utility easements across Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 are listed below: This project is located within the lower Minnesota River Watershed District and will require issuance of appropriate permits. PERMANENT EASEMENT Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Lot 3, Block 1 13,000 sq.ft. Lot 4,, Block 1 12,000 sq.ft. COST ESTIMATES: Detailed'cost estimates are presented in Appendix A ,located at the back of this report. The total estimated project cost as outlined herein including contingencies and all related overhead is $195,880. Overhead costs are estimated at;30Z and include legal, engineering, administration, and bond interest. Page 3. RPT49,499 qJ E AREA TO BE:INCLUDED ASSESSMENT AND CONSTRUCTION AREA Siblev'Terminal Industrial Park Lot -1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 1 Lot 1, 2, Block 2' ASSESSMENTS: Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited property as shown on the attached drawings. A preliminary assessment roll is included at the back of this report in Appendix B. All lateral costs will be revised based .on final costs. These assessments will be spread over 10 years at an interest rate based on the bond sale financing this project. Storm.Sewer: Storm sever proposed herein is lateral and is proposed to be, assessed on an area basis. The benefited drainage area proposed to be assessed is shown on the drawing located at the back of this report. The estimated assessment rate per acre is $7,829 or $0.18 ,per square foot. - I Page 4. RPT49499 0 REVENUE: Revenue sources to cover the cost of this project are listed below: Storm Sever Project Cost Revenue Balance Lateral $195,880 Lateral Assessment $195,880 $195,880 $195,880 - 0 - PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report Public Hearing ApprovePlans and Specifications open Bids/Award Contract Complete Construction Assessment Hearing First Payment, Due with Real Estate Taxes RPT49499 Page 5. November 9, 1989 December 5, 1989 Spring, 1990 Spring, 1990 Summer, 1990 September, 1990 may. 1991 PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARR Item 48" RCP Storm Sever 3'6" RCP 'Storm Sever 30" RCP 'Storm Sever 24" RCP Storm Sever 21" RCP Storm Sever 18" RCP Storm Sever Manhole with casting Catch basin v/cstg. 48" RCP apron v/trash guard Improved pipe foundation Mechanical trench compaction Rip rap B618 concrete curb E gutter Bituminous street repair Pond Excavation Common borrow Topsoil borrow Fiber blanket Seed w/mulch 6 fertilizer Sod STORM SEVER PROJECT NO. 578 Total + 5Z Contingencies Total Unit Unit Quantity L.F. 130. L.F. 370 L.F. 940 L.F. 150 L.F. 630 L.F. 60 Ea. 9 Ea. 6 Ea. 1 L.F. 500 L.F. 2,280 C. Y'. 15 L.F. 100 S.Y. 300 C.Y. 1,000 C.Y. 3,600 C.Y. 400 S.Y. 850 Ac. 3.0 S.Y. B00 Total + 5Z Contingencies Total Price Cost $ 62.00 $8,060.00 58.00 21,460.00 40.00 37,600.00 30.00 4,500.00 28.00 17,640.00 26.00 1,560.00 1,200.00 .10„800.00 1,000.00 6,000.00 1,800.00 1,800.00 1.00 500.00 1.00 2,280.00 100.00 1,500,40 10.00 1,.000.00 20.00 6,000.00 3.00 3,000.00 3.00 10,800.:00 8.00 3,200.00 2.00 1,200.00 1,000.00 3,000.00 2.00 1.600.00 $143,,500.00 7.,180.00 $150,680.00 +302 Legal, Engineering, Admin.,, 6 Bond Interest TOTAL Page 6. RPT49499 45,.200.00 $195,'880.00 Parcel Description PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROIL SIBLEY TERMINAL INDUSTRIAL PARR STORM SEVER PROJECT NO. 578 Total Assessable Lot Drainage Area Area 'Acres (Acres) Siblev Terminal Industrial Park Lot 1, Block 1 4.21 Lot 2, Block 1 5.16 Lot 3, Block 1 4.01 Lot 4, Block 1 5.48 Lot 5, Block 1 4.64 Lot 1, Block 2 4.08 Lot 2, Block 2 4.12 TOTAL 3.10 2.54 4.79 3.23 4.08 4.12 25.02 Page 7. RPT49499 Rate/Acre $7,829 $7,829 $7,829 $7,829 '$7,829 $7,829 $7,829 u Assessment. $24,270 19,886 24,739 37,501 25_,287 31,942 32.255 $195,880 Cyl% O ¢ NORTyK,ES�R� R4/4,?O AO EXISTING WASHOUTS TO BE FILLED AND GRADED II ER INAL INosTRIAL PARI } EX. 4 MWCC SEWER DITCH BLOCK 5 7 EX. 1 TERM/ SEWE �R s ABANI GP -;8 O NO 2i - I I O 6 5 4 M PROPO STORM 32-02 2 TRUNK HIGHWAY NO. 13 12 4 STORM 0 BE DRAINAGE AND ASSESSMENT BOUNDRY Sibley Terminal Ind. Park Storm. Sewer Improvements Eagan, Minnesota Proj. No. 578 D c� EX. 66" STORM ✓OyNSON 1 v PN Ld v 0 200 400 Scole in feet Bonestroo Engineers &Arehneeli Rosene tt� Anderllk A Aesocletes Date: 10/12/89 Comm. 49499 W. Plaut Mlnne.ele Fig. No. 1 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PROPERTY TAX LEW11990 G., Proposed Property Tax Levy Certification for 1990 --Each year the City certifies a property tax levy to Dakota County to provide a major source of revenue for the ensuing operating year. A certification of property tax for payable 1990 will fund a portion of the general fund,,provide an appropriation to the street construction fund, provide funding for the equipment revolving account and retire principal and interest debt obligations for previously approved community referendums. The total levy for 1990 is proposed at $9,725,012. The following is a breakdown of the proposed levy: General Fund is proposed at $7,824,060. This includes a tax levy increase of $74,410 from 1989 and also includes the amount shifted from local government aid to property tax totaling $1,361,532. This amount of LGA will no longer appear in the City budget as a transfer aid from the State of Minnesota. The City's entire amount of transfer aid was distributed proportionately to our three (3) school districts located within the City, and they are required to, reduce property taxes, by that amount: This action is the result of the special legislative session held earlier this fall, and there is no net impact on total property tax as a result of the LGA transfer aid. shift.' The only net increase in property tax to the homeowner will come as a direct impact of the homestead tax credit relief, again a decision of the legislature, and any increases that any of the jurisdictions are proposing for 1990, such as the City's $74,410. It is anticipated with increased valuation that the $74,000 will not cause any increase in the tax capacity rate. Road.and Bridge Fund is budgeted in the amount of $442,802. 'These funds have been set aside as part of the general property tax levy for the street construction fund each of the past ten (10) years. The funds go toward funding a portion of the Citywide sealcoating maintenance program, participation in. the construction of semaphores, funding of oversizing City collector roads, participation in County highway construction and general maintenance where reconstruction is required. Eouinment'RevolvingFund is a special fund the ,City has established for the purpose of funding its major capital equipment purchases, such as snowplows, front end loaders, fire pumper trucks. and other related equipment. By separating the large capital equipment items .from the general fund operating budget, the City can utilize equipment certificates as a revenue source, given the; tight levy limit restrictions, and provide yearly continuity in the operating budget accounts. \ol Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting Debt Service includes special levies for the principal and interest to retire debt on three (3) fire stations, the 1954; park acquisition development referendum and, the referendum that authorized the construction of the Municipal Center building. For a copy of the resolution adopting the levy for 1989 real estate taxes, refer to page lam• The 1990 proposed General Fund Operating Budget will also be presented for input by residents and the City Council. The proposed General Fund Operating Budget for 1990 is $10,767,130, an increase from the 1989 budget that was $10,495,780. The 1990 General Fund Budget attempts to maintain a constant level of service to existing residents while meeting the service demands of a 5% to 10% increase in new households and population. The budget also has made certain revisions to allow for normal inflationary adjustments. SUMMARY The proper action regarding the public hearing portion of the tax levy certification is to hear any and all input from residents, close the public hearing and approve the resolution certifying the property tax levy to Dakota County for 1990. It is recommended that the 1990 General Fund Budget not be adopted until the December 19 City Council meeting, allowing for any public inspection of the budget document as presented and final revision if appropriate by the City Council. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) To close the public hearing and authorize property tax levy certification to Dakota County for collectible 1990, and 2) continue the proposed 1990 General Fund Budget to the December 19 meeting for final ratification. SPECIAL NOTE: There will be a handout for distribution to the residents who are present at the public hearing explaining the property tax levy certification and an outline of the proposed 1990 General Fund Budget. A copy of, that handout will be distributed on Monday as a part of the Administrative Agenda. RESOLUTION CITY OF EAGAN LEVY.OF 1989 REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEREAS, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, was held on December 5, 1989 at 6.:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center, all members being present except , and WHEREAS, upon motion by Councilmember and seconded by Councilmember , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby is on record approving and certifying the levy of 1989 Real Estate Taxes for Eagan, Minnesota, which taxes are payable in 1990 as follows: General Levy (Levy Limit): General Fund Road & Bridge Fund Equipment Revolving Fund TOTAL GENERAL LEVY Special Levies: Debt Service TOTAL SPECIAL LEVIES GRAND TOTAL LEVY Dated: December 5. 1989 $7,824,060 442,802 262,150 $1,196,000 $8,529,012 $1,196,000 59,72b.,-012 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF EAGAN ATTEST CERTIFICATION I, E. J. Vangverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 5th day of, December, 1989. E. J. VanOverbeke, City Clerk City of Eagan X03 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting WRIM § REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT/JIM HORNS A. Request for Reimbursement, Kingswood Addition/Jim Home, Park Dedication/Application Fees --A request was submitted to the City Administrator by Home Development Corporation at the October 16, 1989 meeting requesting reimbursement of fees paid to the City of Eagan for park dedication, a setback variance and the vacation of drainage easements. The total reimbursement as requested by Home Development Corporation was $5,400. The City Administrator reviewed with the appropriate staff the request for the reimbursement of certain fees, and it is the conclusion and recommendation of the City staff that parkland credit in the amount of $1,470 was satisfied by the Blackhawk Park PUD and, therefore, should be reimbursed to Horne Development Corporation. The staff also concluded that the other fees were usual and customary to other development and the City's development policy and should not be considered for reimbursement. Mr. Horne is appealing the findings of the City Administrator to the City Council. For a copy of the original reimbursement request by Horne Development Corporation, a letter from the City Administrator to Mr. Horne and the request forcoo sideration by the City Council, refer to that correspondence referenced as pages � through ( ZZ . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a formal re- imbursement in the amount of $1,470 as dedication credit for parkland that was previously dedicated to the City as a part of the Blackhawk Park PUD to Horne Development Corporation and further to approve or deny the reimbursement of other fees for parkland dedication, a variance procedure and drainage easements. �o� HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION REIMBURSEMENT REQUEST Horne Development Corporation hereby formally requests reimbursement for fees paid to the City of Eagan on the following basis: A. Park Dedication Fees Kings Wood 2nd Addition was platted as 56 single family lots. Of the 56 lots, 11 were previously platted as Kings Wood, but were primarily included as part of the 2nd Addition in order to accommodate the City's request for a modified road alignment. The staff has required that Park Dedication Fees be paid on all previously platted lots except those two occupied by homes. Our claim is for the refund of the fees paid on the 9 additional previously platted lots in the amount of $4,725.00. B. Aoolication Fees 4 S - Kings Wood A=d Addition had several lots which required a setback variance. At the time of the original platting, we were informed by Tom Lovelace that the setback required was the standard setbacks. Had we known of the larger setback, the variance would have been part of the plat request or the plat may have been redesigned. The separate variance procedure fee was $75.00. In addition, the replat of Kings Wood at the request of the City required the vacation of the old roadway easements as well as the drainage easements. The application fee for each of these was $300.00 for a total of $600.00. C. Conclusion Therefore, it is the request of Horne Development Corporation that they be refunded a total of $5,400.00. �oS .. i City OF 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 PHONE: (612) 454-8100 FAX (612) 454-8363 November 15, 1989 JAMES HORNE HORNE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 3850 CORONATION ROAD EAGAN MN 55121 Re: Request for Reimbursement of Fees Paid to the City of Eagan Dear Jim: VC ELLISON Mayos THOMAS EGAN DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCREA THEODORE WACHTER Cw+cll Hampers THOMAS HEDGES Cly Admft la EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE City C� I have reviewed with the appropriate staff your request of October 16 to reimburse certain fees paid to the City of Eagan for 1) park dedication fees and 2) certain application fees. After review by City staff, the question of alignment of the road leading into the civic center site which caused lot lines to be adjusted in the Kingswood Addition is not a valid reason to defer park dedication. Prior to 1981, parks dedication was paid at the time building permits were issued. The Kingswood 1st Addition was platted in 1964, prior to the time that parks dedication was a requirement. Therefore, it appears that no park dedication has been paid previously and became a requirement of the plat. It has been by policy and practice, to collect park dedication on parcels that have not previously paid a fee and are now being platted or replatted. In those instances where homes or development has occurred, they have not been required to pay when platted or replatted. Therefore, the City, according to policy, is unable to refund the park dedication fee as requested. A second issue is your request for credit on 1.85 acres in the Kingswood 4th Addition. The policy has been to collect on those that have not previously paid a dedication; further, no parcel should have to pay twice. Your representation that a portion of the lots platted in the Kingswood 4th Addition should receive a credit due to a previous satisfaction of parkland dedication as a part of the Hlackhawk PUD is correct. The staff report prepared indicated that 1.73 acres was indeed part of the PUD, or approximately 358 of 4.9 acres should receive a dedication credit calculated as follows: 8 X $525 X 0.35 = Credit in the amount of $1,470. It will be recommended to the City Council that you be refunded this amount. THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer lo(P `LETTER TO MR HORNE NOVEMBER 15, 1999. PAGE TWO The other fees for the variance procedure and easements are a matter of policy and ,practice in all developments and, therefore, would not be a legitimate reimbursable expense. Thank you. for your patience as City staff reviewed these items. Please expect City Council authorization of a parkland credit in the, amount $1,470 for a dedication that was satisfied by the Blackhawk Park PUD several years ago. Sincerely,, Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc; Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Tom Colbert, Director ofPublic Works- Ken'Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation TLH/kf. X07 LAW OFFICES LeVander, Gillen, Miller, Anderson & Kuntz 402 DROVERS BANK BLDG. • 633 SOUTH CONCORD ST. • P.O. BOX 296 SOUTH ST. PAUL. MN 550750298 • (612) 451.1831 • FAX (612) 450.7384 November 22, 1989 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 TIM07HY J, KUNTZ DANIEL J. BEESON ROLLIN H. CRAWFORD Re: Horne Development Corporation Request for Reimbursement of Fees Dear Tom: This letter is in response to your letter to Horne Development Corporation dated November 15, 1989, setting out the staff position regarding the request for reimbursement. Please be advised that Horne Development Corporation would like to have this matter considered by the full council at the earliest possible time. If you will notify me of the date when this matter will be considered, I will prepare the information we would like to have presented to the council and will be present at such meeting. Thank you for your thorough consideration of this matter. Very, -truly yours, i oil - in H. Crawford RHC:bjh V A Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting MW A'I3WTES5,, CANCELLATION/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS ON HUD PURCHASED PROPERTY A. Cancellation of Special Assessments on HUD Purchased Property/Authorize Prepayment of All Outstanding Balances --The Director of Finance has completed an analysis of all special assessments and total cost for acquisition of the HUD parcels which include the athletic site at Lexington and Diffley, as well as a parcel at Daniel Drive and adjacent to Walnut Hill Park. Since special assessments had previously been levied on all three (3) subject parcels, payments were due and payable in 1989. Due to the change of. ownership, the 1989 installment went unpaid and is now delinquent. It is the recommendation of the Director of Finance that the City cancel both the 1989 and 1990 installments, including interest and' penalties to Dakota County, and authorize the, prepayment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. For additional information on this item, refer to a memo entitled "HUD Property Special Assessments" enclosed on pages \ ( 0 through —W prepared by the Director of Finance. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: 1) Cancel both the 1989 and 1990 installments of special assessments on HUD purchased property, including interest and penalties due to Dakota County, and 2) Authorize the prepayment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. M1 MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK DATE: NOVEMBER 29# 1989 SUBJECT: BUD PROPERTY SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS As a part of the purchase agreement executed earlier this year for the purchase of the HUD property, the City became responsible for all special assessments on the subject parcels. In the case of levied assessments the 1989 installment was due to Dakota County as billed on the property tax statements. Because of the change in ownership this installment (1989-) went unpaid and is now delinquent. Also, at this time the 1990 installment cannot be prepaid without City Council action. In my opinion, the best way to handle this situation is for the City Council to approve the following: 1. Cancel both the 1989 and 1990 installments including interest and penalties at Dakota County. 2. Authorize pre -payment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition and Development Fund. This fund purchased the land originally and will receive the proceeds from any sales. The dollar amounts are as follows: Annual Principal Property 1989 1990 Balance Total Athletic Site(1) $26,115.97 $26,115.97 $132,181.12 $184,413.06 (8 Parcels) Daniel Drive(2) 926.32 1,94,0.52 22,, 166,80 25,033.64 Walnut Hill Park 2.954.44 2.954.44 16.998.54 22,907.42 Totals(3') $29,996.73 $.37,010.93 $171,346.46 $232,354.12 (1) These numbers do not include Lot 3, Block 2 of Kensington Place which is being purchased from First Financial Corporation in a separate transaction. (2) Tri -Land Properties has been billed $28,376 for the easement they were required to dedicate to the City as a development condition. (3) Pending and future assessment obligations remain on some of these parcels. It should be noted that this HUD property was all tax exempt, consequently, there are no ad valorem taxes involved and this requested action impacts no other taxing jurisdictions. �_a CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES NOVEMBER 29, 1989 PAGE TWO For your information the total cost for acquisition of these properties from information currently available can be summarized as follows. All costs except assessments were lump sum and are allocated by parcel size: Property Walnut Hill Athletic Site Daniel Drive Park Total Acres 62.97 7.43 10.89 81.29 Percent of 'Total 77.5% 9.1% 13.4% 100.0% Cost Item: HUD $988,125 $116,025 $170,850 $1,,275,000 Legal 2,719 319 470 3,508 Title Ins. 2,151 253 372 2,776 Assessments(l) 184,413 25,034 22,907 232..,354 Total Costs $1,177,408(2) $141,631(3) $194,599 $1,5131,63'8 Cost Per Acre $18,698 $19,062 $17,870 $18,620 (1) Does not include any pending or future assessments and assumes no penalty or interest on the 1989 or 1990 installments. (2) Does not include Lot 3, Block 2 of Kensington Place. (3) 'Does not reflect the $28,376 bill to Tri -Land. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss this matter in greater detail. Y F.ina`ce Director/City Clerk cc: Ken Vraa,, Director of Parks & Recreation Linda Fink, Accountant II Deanna Kivi, Assessment Clerk EJV/jeh l0\ Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting PROPOSED 1990 FEE SCHEDULE B. Proposed 1990 Fee Schedule --Each year the City reviews ,all fees for license permits and other City services to determine whether certain adjustments in the fee schedule are appropriate. The Director of Finance coordinates the review and revision process with all City departments and for additional information on any and all fees that are recommended for an ,adjustment in 1990, refer to a memo and attached fee schedule enclosed on pages—LL3 through . ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny with or without modification, the 1990 fee schedule as proposed. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR/CITY CLERK VANOVERBEKE DATE: DECEMBER•1p 1989 SUBJECT: 1990 FEE SCHEDULE Please find attached a copy of the proposed 1990 Fee Schedule. The schedule has been prepared with the recommended rates. Where rates have changed, the 1989 or previous rate is noted in the right hand margin. Also, miscellaneous notes are included within the proposed fee schedule. Certain of the proposed fees show significant increases while others remain the same and a few are decreased. The recommended fees are intended to cover the City's costs and do not incorporate excessive pricing to take advantage of a non-competitive situation. Areas of particular interest include the following: 1. Plan check fees increase from 50% to 65% per previous discussion and approval. 2. Sewer rates (page 15) increase by 13.6% which is a direct result of the MWCC costs billed to the City-. 3. Water rates (page 15) increase by 3.6%. 4. Park dedication fees (page 17) are increased substantially as recommended by the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission. I believe :the new rates reflect land prices and the method of calculation remains consistent with previous years. These rates do not include any consideration for trail dedication requirements. 5. Numerous new fees are added as services are provided differently or in ways that are billable. Page 17 shows a number of them in the park area. Page 18 reflects additional prices of equipment being used. 6. As shown on page 19, staff is recommending significant changes to escrow deposits. We are proposing that escrows be required on Conditional Use Permits, Rezoning Applications and Waivers of Platting applications. These activities are requiring a great deal of staff and consultant time and, therefore, should be handled consistently with platting requirements. The amount of the required escrow deposit is recommended to be the same as that for a preliminary plat. In addition to adding these three areas, the amounts are proposed to be increased dramatically. The increased amounts reflect costs currently being incurred on these projects and lc3 represent an effort to have the money on deposit prior to bills being paid. This request is based on historical data compiled in the escrow accounting system. Please let me know if you would like any additional information or if you would like to discuss this proposed fee schedule in more detail. qv Financ' Director/City Clerk EJV/kf CITY OF EAGAN PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE Effective January 1, 1990 For City Council Review December 5, 1989 �(J LIQUOR FEES FEE TYPE BEER, LIQUOR AND WINE Beer Application and Investigation Off -Sale License On -Sale License Temporary License Liquor Application and Investigation Off -Sale License On -Sale License Sunday License On -Sale Club License Less than 200 201-500 501-1,000 1,001-2,000 2,001-4,000 4,001-6,000 Over 6,000 Temporary (Up to Three Days) Wine Application and Investigation On -Sale License Sunday License Consumption and Display Daily Sports or Convention Duplicate License PROPOSED 1990 FEE $350.00(1) 40.00 175.00 25.00 300.00(2) 200.00 3,500.00 200.00 300.00 500.00 650.00 800.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 3,000.00 150.00 Added in 1989 with code change 200.00(1) 200.00 100.00 25.00 50.00 2.00 (1)When Wine and Beer are applied for by the same applicant, the total maximum investigation fee is $350.00. (2')Also requires an escrow deposit of $1,000.00 for five persons requiring investigation and $200 for each additional if the investigation is conducted within Minnesota, or $2,000.00 for five persons requiring investigation and $400.00 for each additional if the investigation is conducted outside of Minnesota. 1 PROPOSED 1990 FEE TYPE FEE Rubbish Hauler Commercial, Residential or Recycling Only 1st Truck $50.00 Was 40.00 Each Additional 25.00 Was 20.00 Commercial/Residential Combination 1st Truck 75.00 Was 60.00 Each Additional 25.00 Was 30.00 Service Station 50.00 Solicitors (Non -Profit) 25.00 Solicitors (For Profit) 50.00 Investigation License Fee 25.00 up to 3 solicitors 5.00 each additional over 3 Trailer Permit 25.00 Dog License Male or Female 6.00 Neutered or Spayed 3.00 Late Fee 2.00 Duplicate Dog Tag 1.00 New Kennel Permit Initial 50.00 Renewal 25.00 Photocopies .50/page Fee Schedule 2.00 Animal Pick Up 15.00 Was 10.00 Animal Impound 4.00/day over amount billed the City by the animal pound Permit Reissuance Fee 25.00 Was 20.00 Returned Check Fee 10.00 False Alarm Commercial 75.00 Per False Alarm After 6 (City Code) Residential 50.00 Per False Alarm After 6 (City Code) Radio Communications Lease Previously Negotiated Rate New + 5$ y 2 � 11 FEE TYPE Alarm Panel Parade Permit Fee PROPOSED 1990 FEE 8.00/month 25.00 Shows (circus, carnival, etc.) License 25.00 50.00 Investigation Massage Therapy Establishment License Massage Therapist License Accident Photo Police/Fire Reports: Accident Incident (Police and Fire) Gambling Investigation Cigarette License Mechanical Amusement 1-3 Machines 4-15 Machines 15+ Machines 300.00 (includes 1 massage therapist license) 300.00 Investigation (includes 1 massage therapist) 50.00 200.00 Investi atio - Revised in 1989 wi code change 5.00/first print 3.00/print after first 3.00 4.00 first 2 pages .25/additional page 250.00 25.00 25.00 200.00 400.00 Contractors Licenses Plumbing MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Sewer and Water MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Well Driller MN Master License No. & $2,000 Bond & Certificate of Insurance Topographic Maps 6.30/Acre Mailing Labels LOGIS Cost + $10.00 Notary Seal 1.00 Each for first 5 Was .50 .50 each for all additiona Voter Certification 1.00 Duplicate Certificate of Occupancy Golf Driving Range License 3 5.00 50.00 Added in 1989 with new requirement SUBDIVISION AND PLATTING FEE TYPE Final Plat Preliminary Plat Rezoning Planned Dev. PD -Annual Review Conditional Use Permit Variance PROPOSED 1990 FEE $100.00 Require Escrow +$3/lot Deposits Per Development Escrow Policy 300.00 150.00 Was 250 - should not be reduced unless the escrow is added. 250.00 25.00 Initial 150.00 Renewal - CUP 25.00 Waiver of Plat Duplex Lot Splits Others Special Permit Interim Use Permit Grading/Excavation Permits If Preliminarily Platted Not Preliminarily Platted Renewal Utility Permits Utility Companies Permit For Construction in City Right -of -Way Assessment Search Vacation Proceedings Industrial Revenue Bond and Multifamily Housing Bond Processing Fee Market Analysis Study `41 75.00 50.00 150.00 Was 300 -should not be reduced unless the escrow is added 50.00 75.00 Added in 1989 with Code change. Accessory Housing ,Permit Eliminated in 1989 with Code Change 250.00 325.00 150.00 10.00 20.00 10.00 Was 8.00 300.00 500.00 50.00 FEE TYPE- Zoning Map Zoning Regulations (City Code - Chapter 11) Liquor Regulations (City Code Chapter 5) Subdivision Regulations (City Code - Chapter 13) Traffic Regulations (City Code - Chapter 8) Parking Regulations (City Code - Chapter 9) Sign Regulations City Code Each Chapter (All Chapters Except 5,8,9,11,13) Code Book Code Book with Binder City Code Updates Street Name Change Application Comp. Plan Amendment PROPOSED 1990 FEE 5.00 10.00 10.00 Was included below at 5.00 10.00 3.00 3.00 2,.50 5.00 Excludes Chapter 5 now proposed at 10.00 60.00 75.00 10.00 100.00 300.00 INSPECTION FEES FEE TYPE Building Permit Demolition Permit Disposal Permit Electrical Permit Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning Moving Permit Plumbing and Gas Fitting Sign Permit Wind Energy, Radio and Television Tower Permit Plan Check (Valuation over $10,,000') Foundation Permit Replacement Building Permit Field Card Lot Transfer Fee (Bldg. Permit) Processing Fee on Cancelled Permits PROPOSED 1990 FEE Based on Value - See Attached' copy of Table 3-A of Uniform Building Code 15.00 10.00 See Schedule Attached See Schedule Attached 30.00 Plus Cost of Repairs and Escrow See Schedule Attached 2.50 per square foot Based on Value - See Attached copy of Table 3-A of Uniform Building Code 65% of Permit Fee Was 50% Based on Value - See Attached copy of Table 3-A of Uniform Building Code - $30.00 Minimum 5.00 New 50.00 15.00 New BUILDING PERMITS CITY OF EAGAN 1990 PERMIT FEES S LICENSING REQUIREMENTS PERMIT FEES - RESIDENTIAL - Fees based on UBC Fee Schedule 65$ Plan Review Charge on all permits over $10,000. Was 50% Permits are issued to specific lots - any lot change after issuance of permit $50.00 transfer fee. Utility Charges - collected with permit fee Was Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) - $700.00 675 Water Availability Charge (WAC) - $625.00 580 Water Meter (5/811) - $ 90.00 Road Unit Charge - $355.00 340 Treatment Plant Charge - $252.00 228 $1.00 - $500.00 -- No Permit Required $501.00 - $2,000.00 -- $15.00 for the first $500.0.0 plus $2.00 for each additional $100.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00. $2,001.00 - $25,000.00 -- $45.00 for the first $2,000.00 plus $9.00 for each additional $1,0.00.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000,00. $25,001.00 - $50,000.00 -- $252.00 for the first $25,000.00 plus 6.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00. $50,001.00 - $100,000.00-- $414.50 for the first $50,000.00 plus $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000.00. $100,001.00-$500,000.00 -- $639.50 for the first $100,000.00 plus $3.50 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof. $500,001.00 - $1,000,000-- $2,039.50 for the first $500,000.00 plus $3.00 for each additional $1,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00. $1,000,001.00 and Up -- $3,539.50 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $2.00 for each additional $1,,000.00 or fraction thereof. All permit fees are rounded to the nearest numerically even dollar amount. 7 �Z Accessory buildings in apartment complexes will not pay MWCC SAC (Per MWCC policy). City SAC, .WAC, Road 'Unit and Water Treatment will be charged at 808 of full value,. STATE SURCHARGE ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS Valuation of Structure Surcharge Addition or Alteration Computation Were Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) -808 of $700 x number of units $675 Water Availability Charge (WAC) -808 of $625 x number of units 580 Road Unit -808 of $355 x number of units 340 Treatment Plant Charge -808 of $252 x number of units 228 Accessory buildings in apartment complexes will not pay MWCC SAC (Per MWCC policy). City SAC, .WAC, Road 'Unit and Water Treatment will be charged at 808 of full value,. STATE SURCHARGE ON ALL BUILDING PERMITS Valuation of Structure Surcharge Addition or Alteration Computation $1,,000,000 or Less .0005 x Valuation $1,000,001 to $2,000,000 $ 500 + .0004 x (Value - $1,000,000) $2,000,001 to $3,000,000 $ 900 + .0003 x (Value - $2,000,000) $3,000,001 to $4,000,000 $1,200 + .0002 x (Value - $3,000,000) $4,000,,:001 to $5,000,000 $1,400 + .0001 x (Value - $4,000,000) $5,000,001 and Up $1,500 + .00005 x (Value - $5,000,000) 8 ��3 1990 CITY OF EAGAN PLUMBING PERMIT FEES TYPE OF FIXTURE Water Closet @ $3.00 Each Bath Tub @ $3,.00 Each Lavatory @ $3.00 Each Shower (Per Head) @ $3.00 Each Sink @$3.00 Each Urinal @ $3.00 Each Bidet @ $3.00 Each Laundry Tub @ $3.00 Ea. TYPE OF FIXTURE Janitor Sink or Receptor @ $3..00 Ea. Water Heater @ $3.00 Each Floor Drain @ $1.50 Each Water StandPipe @ $1.50 Each Gas Pipe Outlets.@ $1,.50 Each Rough Openings -No Openings @$,1.50 Ea Fixtures on Rough Openings @$1.50 Ea PERMIT FEES: it of Contract Fee With a Minimum Fee of .$20.00. State Surcharge is $.50 Per Each $1,000 of Fee (Not the Contract Cost). $12.00 Minimum Fee 1990 CITY OF EAGAN MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES RESIDENTIAL HEATING 01-100,000 BTU's - $24..00, Each (Includes Cooling for New Additional 50.,000 BTU's or Construction). Fraction - $6.00 RESIDENTIAL COOLING $12.00 ('Add on) MODIFICATIONS/ALTERATIONS $12.00 Minimum COMMERCIAL PERMIT FEES 1% of Contract Fee with a Minimum Fee of $20.00. State Surcharge is $..50 Per Each $3,000 of Fee (Not the Contract Cost) CITY OF EAGAN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FEES NOTE: MINIMUM CHARGE FOR EACH INSPECTION - $15.00 AL PERMITS REQUIRE S.50 STATE SURCHARGE 1. Payment of fees - All electrical inspection fees are due and payable to the City of Eagan at or before commencement of the installation and shall be forwarded to the City of Eagan. 2. The fees for signs shall be computed in accordance with State schedule with a minimum fee of $15.00 per sign. 3. Swimming pool ground fees shall be computed separately at $40.00 per pool. 4. Minimum fee for each separate inspection of an installation, replacement, alteration or repair limited to one inspection only - $15.0.0,. 5. Services-, change of services, temporary services, additions, alterations or .repairs on either primary or secondary services shall be computed separately. 1 to 100 ampere capacity ..$15.00 101 to and including 200 ampere capacity or fraction thereof ................$18.00 For each addition of 100 amperes or fraction thereof ...........$ 5.00 6. Circuit, installations or additions, alterations or repairs of each circuit or subfeeder shall be computed separately including circuits fed from subfeeders and including the equipment service. Circuits of 250 volts or less. 0 to and including 30 ampere capacity ..........$ 4.00 31 to and including 100 'ampere capacity ........$ 7.00 For each additional 100 ampere capacity or fraction thereof .... . .. ... ......$ 6.00 For circuits over 250 volts, double the fee for 250 volts or less. 7. In addition to the above fees: a. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each street lighting standard. b. A charge of $2.00 will be made for each traffic signal head. Circuits originating within the standard will not be used when computing the fee. 8. In addition to the above fees, all transformers an& generators for lights,, heat and power shall be computed separately at $2.00 per unit plus $.10 per RVA up to and including 100 KVA, 101 RVA and over at $.05 per KVA. The maximum fee for any transformer or generator in this category is $20.00. 10 � a S 9. In addition to the above fees, all transformers for signs and outline lighting shall be computed at $3.00 for the first 500 VA or fraction thereof per unit, plus $.25 for each additional 100 VA or fraction thereof. 10. In addition to the above fees (unless included in the maximum fee filed by the initial installer). remote controls, signal circuits, fire warning and security circuits of less than 50 volts shall be computed at $15.00 per first ten openings or devices of each system plus $1.00 for each additional opening. 11. For the review of plans and specifications of proposed, installations, there shall be a minimum fee of S100.00 up to and including $30,000 of electrical estimate, plus 1/10 of 1$ on any amount in excess of $30,000 to be paid by persons or firms requesting the review. 12. When reinspection is necessary to determine whether unsafe conditions have been corrected and such conditions are not the subject of an appeal pending before the Board or any court, a reinspection fee of not to exceed the original unit fee, or $15.00, whichever is less, may be assessed in writing by the inspector. 13. For inspections not covered herein, or for requested special inspections or services, the fee shall be $25.00 per man hour, including travel time, plus $.20 per mile traveled, plus the reasonable cost of equipment of material consumed. This section is also applicable to inspection of empty conduits and such other jobs as determi=ned by the inspector. 14. For inspections of transient project including, but not limited to, carnivals and circuses, the inspection fees shall be computed as follows: a. Power supply units - According to Item 4(b) (2) of fee schedule - a like fee will be required on power supply units at each engagement during the season, except that a fee of $25.00 per hour will be charged for additional time spent by the inspector if the power supply is not ready for inspection at the time and date specified on the request for inspection as required by law. b. Rides, devices or concessions - Shall be inspected at their first appearance of the season and the inspection fee shall be $15.00 per unit. 15. Fees double - When any person, co -partnership or corporation begin work of any kind such as hereinbefore set forth, or for which a permit from the electrical inspector is required by ordinance, without having secured the necessary permit therefore from the inspector of buildings either previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on the next succeeding day where such work is commenced on a Saturday or on a Sunday or a holiday, he shall when subsequently securing such permit, be required to pay double the fees herein- before provided for such permit, and shall be subject to all penal provisions of this ordinance. 16. Additional. Fees and/or Fee Shortage - Additional fees and/or fee shortages must be received by the City within 14 days of written notice. If additional fees and/or fee shortages are not received within 14days of notice, permits for electrical installations will not be accepted by the City until such time as the additional fees and/or shortages are received. Additional fees and/or fee shortages that are not received within 14 days of notice are subject to a 10% per day penalty. ASSESSMENT FEES FEE TYPE Trunk Assessment/Connection Charge Trunk Sanitary'Sewer Oversize Unplatted Platted Residential Trunk Water Main Oversize Unplatted and Platted Comm. & Ind. Platted Residential Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Comm. & Ind. Trunk Storm Sewer Oversize. Single Family Multi -Family Comm. & Ind. PROPOSED 1990 FEE Were $1,435/Ac. $1,365 690/Lot 655 1,450/Ac. 1,380 695/Lot 660 2,285/Ac. 2,115 .:056/S''.;F. .07,0/S.F. . 083/S.,F. Lateral Benefit Assessment/Connection Charge Lateral Benefit from Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lateral Benefit from Trunk Water Main Single Family Multi -Family and Comm. &,Ind. Lateral Benefit from Trunk Storm Sewer 1211 Storm Sewer 1511 Storm Sewer 18" Storm Sewer 21" storm Sewer 24" Storm Sewer 33.10/Centerline Foot 31.70 28.35/Centerline Foot 27.50 46.75/Centerline Foot 45,.40 *37.155/Centerline Foot 3'6.50 *39.00/Centerline Foot 37.90 *41.6'0/Centerline Foot 40.40 *44.75/Centerline Foot 43.50 *51.35/Centerline Foot 49.90 *Rate is based on a pipe at 15 foot depth, cost for additional depth will be reviewed on a case by case basis. 113 I gl Street Assessments Street Surfacing s/Storm Sewer Street Surfacing w/Grading Street Surfacing w/Storm Sewer Street Surfacing w/Grading & Storm Sewer Residential Multiple Comm./Ind. 32' Wide 44' Wide 52' Wide Rate/F.F. Rate/F.F. Rate/F.F. Was Was Was $26.60 $25.50 $48.40 $46.15 $63.90 $61.05 30.20 29.00 56.85 54.40 77.25 74.05 37.90 36.50 62.55 59.90 80.65 77.35 41.50 40.00 71.00 68.15 94.00 90.35 Trails Concrete (5' wide) Bituminous Trail (8' wide) $12.20/F.F. 8.90/F. F. 14 Was 12.00 Was 8.410 UTILITY RATES AND FEES FEE TYPE Sanitary Sewer Single Family, Townhouse and Similar Residential Apartment,, Institutional Commercial & Industrial Sewer only (Sewer with no water connection/meter to measure flow) Water Works All users Water Account Deposit Sewer Account Deposit .Street Light Energy Single Family/Twin Homes (R-1., R-2) Townhouses (R-3-) Multiple Residential & Commercial/Industrial Road Unit Charge Residential Except Apartments Apartments (80%) Comm. & Ind. Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Single Family (R1 and R2) Other Treatment Plant Charge Water Supply & Storage (WAC) Single Family Apartments Comm. & Ind. PROPOSED 1990 FEE as MN $15.45/Qtr. for 10,000 13.60 Gal. $1.35/1000 Gal. for 1.17 All Usage Over 10,,000 Gal. Based on Winter Quarter Meter Reading MN $15.45/Qtr. for 10,000 .13.60 Gal. $1.35/1000 Gal. for 1.17 all Usage over 10,000 Gal Flat Rate - $28.95/Qtr. 25.30 MN $'14..5'0/Qtr for 10,000 14.00 Gal. & $.80/1000 Gal. for .77 All Usage Over 10,000 Gal $15..00/Residential Account (Old deposit not pr.eviously'listed) $15.00/Residential Account (Old deposit not previously listed) $2.65 Per Qtr Per Lot $2.10 Per Qtr Per Unit $18.40 Per Qtr Per Billing Acct. $12.60 per light/mth-new category $3'55/unit 284/unit 1,065/acre $700 MWCC 252.00 625/Lot 500/unit 2,285/acre Shut-off Charge 25.00 Delivery of Shut-off Notice 10.00. as $340 272 1,020 675 228 580 464 2,115 FEE TYPE Late Fee Sewer Permit Water Permit PROPOSED 1990 FEE 10% of Balance $15.00 Was 10.50 15-00 Was 10.50 Construction Meter Permit 10.00 ($100 Escrow Dep.,) After Hours Work. A. Call Out - Labor Rate 2.5 Hr. Minimum + 10% Administrative B. Extended Day Labor + 10% Admin. Water Meter Removal 30.00 Water Meter Replacement 30.00 Sewer Tap 100.00 Water Tap 100.00 Water Meters 5/8" x 3/4" meter* 90.00 3/4 water meter* 120.00 1" water meter 125.00 1'11 water meter 325.00 2'" water meter 455.00 211' compound 970.00 3" compound 1,205.00 4" compound 1,,900.00 6" compound 3,620.00 2" turbo meter 475.00 3" turbo meter 639.85 4" turbo meter 1,075.00 6" turbo meter 2,220.00, #2 copperhorn w/swivel 16.00 Remote wire (over'351) 0.06/Ft Meter Strainers: 211 160.00 3,11 207.00 411 312.00 Meter Testing (Charged only if meter tests correct): '5/8" through 211 50.00 All other sizes Contract Cost (Mpls)+ 10% Meter Box Cover 31.0.0 New related to development Lid to Meter Box Cover 15.00 New related to development Deposit to turn on water before all work is satisfactorily completed 200.00 New * Includes Copperhorn 16 1b\ PARKS AND RECREATION FEE TYPE Parkland Dedication Single Family Duplex Townhouse/Quad Apartments/Multiple Commercial and Industrial Park Fees Picnic Kit Trapp Farm and Thomas Lake Pavilions(1) Enclosed Shelter Buildings(l) Open Shelters Extra Picnic 'Tables (maximum of six) PROPOSED 1990 FEE Was $685.00 525 600.00 488 535.00 414 540.00 427 .05/S.F. (To be recommended by Park Commission after 12-7-89 meeting) 3.00/5:.00 50..,00 Per Day 35.00 1/2 Day 50.00 Per Day Was 35.00 35.00 1/2 Day 15.00 15.00 New Athletic Facilities/Shelters(1) Fields 35.00 Per Field Per Day Lights (If Required) -Tournaments 20.00 Per Field Per Hr Building Cleaning 30.00 Per Day Restrooms/Bases/Field Chalking 15.00 per reservation New Maintenance Fee - Travel Baseball 50.00 Youth/Team New 200.00 Adult/Team New Concession Permit (maximum of 3,) 200.00 Set previously - not listed Community Rooms Events 35.00 Profit and Fund Raising 50.00 Chuckwagon Grill 25.00 Canopy 50.00/Day (1) Requires Damage Report 100.00 17 Was 15.00 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT AND PERSONNEL FEETYPE Maintenance Person Foreman Pick-up truck 1 'Ton dump truck Single axle dump,truck Tandem axle dump truck Tractor Backhoe/loader Front end"loader Road grader Street sweeper Roller Paver Air Compressor 50 KW'Generator Sewer Jetter Sewer Rodder Sewer Vacuum - Trailer Sewer Vacuum - Truck Groundsmaster Mower Pump 6" Pump 8" Skid Loader Chipper PROPOSED 1990 FEE $20,.00/hr. 30,.00/hr. 24.00/hr. 22.00/hr. 23.00/hr. 30.00/hr. 35.00/hr. 15.00/hr. 35.00/hr. 56..00/hr. 56.00/hr. 41.00/hr. 15.00/hr. 20.0,0/hr. 12.00/hr. 3'5.00/hr. 66.00/hr. 33.00/hr. 33.00/hr. 70.00/hr. 22.00/hr. 25.;00/hr. 28.00/,hr. 35.00/hr. 15.00/hr. 18 lbs (Regular). (Overtime) New New New New New Was 17.00 25.50 20.00 8.00 EXHIBIT "BN (Developer's Escrow Agreement) Preliminary Plat Application Escrow (1) Conditional Use Permit Escrow Rezoning Escrow New Waiver of Platting Escrow New $150 per acre $1,500 Minimum $4,800 Maximum Final Plat Application Escrow (1) $4,000 Contract Management. Escrow (1) Estimated Construction Costs (2) 0 $150'.,,000 $150,001 - $500.,000 $50,0,001 + New Was $750 Was 2,400 Was $500 Escrow Were 8% ($1,000 Minimum) 4'% 500 6% ($12,000 Minimum) 3$ 6,000 5% ($30,000 Minimum) 2.5% 15,000 (')These are escrow deposits with minimums/maximums, they are not intended to be actual charges. (2)Costs will be verified by City staff and adjusted as necessary to be comparable to City Projects, thereby insuring armslength transaction costs. 19 l Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting SOLID WASTE ORDINANCES C. Amendments, Solid Waste Ordinances --The Solid Waste Abatement Commission has given consideration to several policies relative to the City's recycling program that require amendments to the existing Solid Waste Ordinance. There are specifically two categories the amendments address and they include: 1) house cleaning clarifying amendments and 2) the residential recycling program to include multiply residential 'dwellings consistent with the Dakota County requirements for 1990. It is the intention of the Solid Waste Abatement Commission in their recommendation to the City Council for approval of these amendments that the new legislation be in effect by January 1, 1990, so haulers are properly noticed and the new language is enforced at the time the license renewals take place. For additional infor tion and a copy of the ordinance amendments, please refer to pages /��2�/ through —. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the proposed amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance with or without modification. MEMO TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES FROM: ASSISTANT TO THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR ROSENSTEIN DATE: NOVEMBER 2:7p 1989 SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE Attached you will find proposed amendments of proposed City Code, Chapter 6.37 regarding hauler licenses and 10.01 regarding storage of refuse. These show standard legislative amendment notation which strike out deletions and underline additions to the existing text. These changes have been reviewed at the City Attorney's office and have been approved as to form. With respect to content the thrust of the amendments is to do the following things: 1. Housecleaning and clarifying amendments - these include a. Section 6.37, subd. 1B - modification of language to permit enforcement by City personnel for trash piles including building materials and wood wastes. b. Section 6.37, subd. 1D - addition of metal food cans, effective.February 1, 1990, consistent with Dakota County requirements. C. Section 6.37, subd. 2A - broadened the description to include dumpster-s and garbage carts designated for recyclables. d. Section 10.01, subd. 1B - modification of other refuse definition as above. e. Section 10.01, subd. lI - adds a definition for curb side as being from the back of the curb to eight feet behind the curb on or near the residential driveway. This makes it illegal for residents to store their garbage in the street while leaving latitude for the containers to be placed away from the curb during winter months when snow storage and plowing are issues. The second category of amendments expands the residential recycling program to include multiple residential dwellings, consistent with Dakota County requirements for 1990. They are as follows: a. Section 6.37, subd. 4A3 and 4A5 - these sections extend the requirement for haulers to provide recycling service to multi -family residential dwellings no later than October 1, 1990. Approximately 700 of the 4800 apartment units in the City already have such service and Kris will be working with the rest of the complexes in 1990 to bring them all into compliance by October 1. ✓W� SOLID WASTE ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS NOVEMBER 21, 1989 PAGE TWO b. Section 10.01, subd. 6A - this section makes it illegal for associations or management companies have hauling contracts which do not provide for recycling. C. Section 10.01, subd. 2D - this amendment more strictly defines the times at which garbage and recycling containers can be placed at the curb. Some complaints have been received by staff concerning residents leaving garbage cans and recycling containers at the curb for several days after their collection. This amendment would permit staff to enforce removal of the containers from the curb side if necessary. The action requested of the Council is to approve these modifications prior to January 1 such that they will be enforced at the time that license renewals take place for 1990. In addition to these amendments, the Solid Waste Abatement Commission is working on one additional amendment which would provide for exemption to the multi -family recycling requirement for mixed municipal solid waste designated to an intermediate processing facility such as the Reuter Plant. The reasons for such an exemptions will be more fully explained if that amendment is brought forward by the Commission. It is mentioned here by way of information that additional work is in progress. If you have any questions concerning this item, please let me know. As 'stant to the City Administrator Enclosures JDH/jeh l 3)l ORDINANCE NO. 2ND,BERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 6 ENTITLED "OTHER BUSINESS REGULATION AND LICENSING" BY AMENDING SECTION 6.37 REGARDING GARBAGE, REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULERS; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 6.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Chapter 6 of the Eagan City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SEC 6.37,. GARBAGE-, REFUSE AND RECYCLING HAULERS Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes, including animal offal and carcasses of dead animals but excluding human excreta, sewage and other water carried wastes. B. "Other Refuse" means ashes, non -recyclable glass, crockery, cans, paper„ boxes, rags and similar nonputrescible wastes but exeled}ng sand, earth, brie#,—stone, eenerete, trees, tree=branehes and weed including sand, earth. firewood. C. "Recyclables" means materials which may be recycled or reused through recycling processes including targeted recyclables. D. "Targeted Recyclables" means metal beverage containers, glass, newsprint, metal food cans.* or other materials as may be defined by Council resolution. * Effective February 1. 1990. E. "Yard Waste" means leaves and grass clippings or other materials as may be defined by Council resolution. F. "Residential Dwelling" - Any single building consisting of one through four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. G. "Multiple Residential Dwelling" - Any building used for residential purposes consisting of more than four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. H. "Commercial Establishment" - Any premises where a commercial or industrial enterprise of any kind is carried on, and shall include restaurants, clubs,, churches, and schools where food is prepared or served. 3g I. "Special Pick -Up" means any collection of materials other than garbage, other refuse, recyclables or yard waste including white goods, furniture, oversized materials and construction debris. J. "Daily Hauling District" means a residential area in which garbage, other refuse, recyclables and yard waste are collected on the same day, the boundaries and day of collection of which are defined by Council action. Subd. 2. License Required. It is unlawful for any person to haul garbage, other refuse or recyclables for hire without a license therefore from the City, or to haul garbage, other refuse or recyclables from his own residence or business property other than as herein excepted. A. It is'unlawful for any person or business to scavenge or otherwise collect garbage, other refuse, recyclables or yard waste at the curb or from reeyelable eentainers containers designated for recyclable materials without a license therefore from the City and an account relationship with the owner of the premises. Subd. 3. Exception. Nothing in this Section shall prevent persons from hauling garbage, other refuse or recyclables from their own residences or business properties provided the following rules are observed: 1) that all garbage is hauled in containers that are water -tight on all sides and the bottom and with tight -fitting covers on top, 2) that all other refuse and recyclables are hauling in vehicles with leak -proof bodies and completely covered or enclosed by canvas or other means or material so as to completely eliminate the possibility of loss of cargo, 3) that all garbage and other refuse shall be dumped or unloaded only at the designated sanitary land -fill or County designated facility, 4) that recyclables may be disposed of at a recycling facility, an organized recyclable drive or through a licensed recyclable hauler, and 5) that yard waste may be composted privately or be disposed of at a composting facility or through a licensed refuse hauler or recyclable hauler. Subd. 4. Hauler License Requirements. A. Hauler licenses shall be granted only upon the condition that the licensee have water -tight packer -type vehicles or, int he case of recycling haulers, appropriate container vehicles in good condition to prevent loss in transit of liquid or solid cargo, that the vehicle be kept clean and as free from offensive odors as possible and not allowed to stand in any street longer than reasonably necessary to collect garbage, other refuse, yard waste or recyclables. 1. There shall be three license categories defined by the type of account served: 1) Commercial/Multiple Dwelling, 2) Residential Dwelling and 3) 2. Commercial/Multiple Dwelling and„Residential Dwelling hauling licenses include Residential Recycling licenses. a. Residential Recycling licensees may only collect recyclables as defined herein. 3. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall make curbside recycling collection available to all, Residential Dwelling accounts. Commercial/Multiple Dwelling hauling licensees At a minimum, such service shall include all targeted recyclables as defined herein. 4. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees shall make weekly collection of separated garbage and other refuse, yard waste and recyclables for all Residential Dwelling Accounts within the daily hauling districts as defined by Council action. a. It shall be unlawful for refuse vehicles to operate on residential streets in such districts on any other day, except to collect a missed pick-up, special pick-up or when an observed holiday falls within that week. 5. At a minimum. commercial/multiple dwelling hauling licensees shall make weekly collections of separated garbage, other refuse and recyclables for all multiple residential dwelling accounts no later than October 1. 1990. B. Before a garbage and refuse hauler or recycling license shall be issued, the applicant shall file with the City Clerk -Treasurer evidence that he has provided public liability insurance on all vehicles in at least the sum of $100,000.00 for injury of one person, $300,000.00 for the injury of two or more persons in the same accident, and $50,000.00 for property damages. C. The Council, in the interest of maintaining healthful and sanitary conditions in the City, hereby reserves the right to specify and assign certain areas to all licensees, and to limit the number of licenses issued. D. Each applicant shall file with the City Clerk - Treasurer, before a garbage and refuse hauler or ,recycling license is issued' or renewed, a schedule of proposed rates to be charged by him during the licensed period for which the application is made. Every licensee shall provide prior notification of any change in rates to be implemented during the licensed period. 1. Residential Dwelling hauling licensees rates shall include a minimum of two levels of regular service, priced on the basis of volume. E. No hauler operating on a route in a residential district shall operate a truck on any City street when the weight `gyp of said vehicle exceeds eight tons per axle. F. No hauler shall operate in a residential district after 8:30 o'clock P.M. or before 6:30 o'clock A.M. of any day, and no hauler shall operate in a residential district on Sunday. G. Each vehicle for which a hauler's license is issued shall exhibit•such license in a prominent position on said vehicle,: H. All Residential Dwelling, Commercial/Multiple Dwelling, and Recycling Hauling licensees shall report to the City, on the form .provided for such •purpose, the quantity of all recyclables and yard waste abated' from the landfills. Such quantities shall be reported by tonnage, with the exception that yard waste may be reported in estimates of cubic yardage abated. Failure to certify accurate volumes in a timely manner may be cause for revocation of hauling license. Section Z. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the. Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation"' and Section 6.999, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanorl"are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST;: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: Its: Clerk Date Ordinance Adopted: By: Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: ORDINANCE NO. 2ND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA, AMENDING EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 10 ENTITLED "PUBLIC PROTECTION, CRIMES AND OFFENSES" BY AMENDING SECTION 10.01 REGARDING STORAGE, DEPOSIT AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE; AND BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE EAGAN CITY CODE CHAPTER 1 AND SECTION 10.99. The City Council of the City of Eagan does ordain: Section 1. Chapter 10 of the Eagan City Code is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 10.01. STORAGE, DEPOSIT AND DISPOSAL OF REFUSE Subd. 1. Definitions. The following terms, as used in this Section, shall have the meanings stated: A. "Garbage" means all putrescible wastes, including animal offal and carcasses of dead animals but excluding human excreta, sewage and other water -carried wastes. B. "Other Refuse" means ashes, non -recyclable glass, crockery, cans, paper, boxes, rags and similar nonputrescible wastes but exeludine sand. earth, briek, stene, eenerete, trees, C. "Recyclables" means materials which may be recycled or reused through recycling processes. D. "Yard Waste" - Leaves and grass clippings or other materials as may be defined by Council resolution. E. "Residential Dwelling" - Any single building consisting of one through four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. F. "Multiple Dwelling" - Any building used for residential purposes consisting of more than four dwelling units with individual kitchen facilities for each. G. "Commercial Establishment" - Any premises where a commercial or industrial enterprise of any kind is carried on, and shall include restaurants, clubs, churches, and schools where food is prepared or served. H. "Association" - All cooperative organizatiops of residential dwelling owners formed for the purpose of joint management of property or services. 4 L Subd. 2. Storage.., A. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or other refuse on residential dwelling premises for more than one week. All such storage shall be in water -tight, metal or plastic containers of not less than five gallons with tight fitting covers, which shall be maintained in a. clean and sanitary condition; provided, that yard wastes may be stored in biodegradable plastic bags and tree limbs must be stored in bundles weighing no more than sixty pounds and no longer than four feet. B. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or other refuse on multiple dwelling premises for more than one week. Such storage shall be in containers as for residential dwelling premises, except that so-called "dumpsters" with close - fitting covers may be substituted. C. It is unlawful for any person to store garbage or other refuse on commercial establishment premises for more than forty-eight hours. Such storage shall be in containers as for residential dwelling premises, except that so-called "dumpsters" with close -fitting covers may be substituted. or garage. Subd. 3. Deposit. It is unlawful for any person to deposit garbage or other refuse from any source, in any place other than a sanitary landfill or County designated facility. Subd. 4. Fire Danger. It is unlawful for any person'to store, deposit or dispose of any garbage or other refuse which is in flames or heated to the point where it could cause danger of fire in other refuse. Subd. 5. Disposal. The Council may, by resolution, adopt, and from time to time amend, adjust and revise such rules, regulations, rates and charges as it deems necessary or proper for the operation and management of the sanitary landfill. It may give notice of any such action as it deems necessary. Subd. 6,. Joint Management Hauling Contracts. Occupants of residential dwelling properties managed by associations or L(3 others shall have the same opportunity to recycle afforded to occupants of other residential dwelling units. It is unlawful for any Residential Dwelling association or other Residential Dwelling joint management entity to negotiate, execute or maintain a contract for residential garbage or other refuse collection unless it includes as a part of that contract, or as part of a separate contract, weekly collection of recyclables occurring on the same day as its refuse collection. weekly collection of recvclables. Section 2. Eagan City Code Chapter 1 entitled "General Provisions and Definitions Applicable to the Entire City Code Including 'Penalty for Violation'" and Section 10.99, entitled "Violation a Misdemeanor" are hereby adopted in their entirety by reference as though repeated verbatim. Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect upon its adoption and publication according to law. ATTEST: CITY OF EAGAN City Council By: By: Its: Clerk Its: Mayor Date Ordinance Adopted: Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper: Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989, City Council Meeting VARIANCE/SIDEYARD SETBACK FOR TIMANDCONNIE WHITE D. Variance, Tim and Connie White, of 4 -Foot to Side Yard Setback to Accommodate Expansion of Existing Single-Fandly Home -Tim and Connie White who reside at 4480 Oak Chase Way, Lot 5, Block 2, Oak -Chase 3rd Addition are requesting a variance to the side yard setback to accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of the existing single family home. For additional information on this item, refer to report pre��p%� d by the Community Development Department referenced as pages through / 7d . This type of variance does not require any action by the Planning Commission and is, therefore, published in the legal newspaper and notices are sent to the surrounding neighbors providing notification that the City Council will consider the variance application. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the variance request by Tim and Connie White for a side yard setback to accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of their existing single-family home at Lot 5, Block 2, Oak Chase 3rd Addition. `L- ' SUBJECT: VARIANCE APPLICANT: TIM 6 CONNIE WHITE LOCATION: 4480 OAR CHASEWAY (LOT 5, BLOCK 2, OAR CHASE 3RD ADDITION) EXISTING ZONING: E (ESTATE RESIDENTIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: DECEMBER 5, 1989 DATE OF REPORT: NOVEMBER 28, 1989 COMPILED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: The applicants are requesting a Variance to the side yard setback to ,accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of the existing single family home. COMMENTS: The applicant's home was built in 1976. On May 3, 1977 the City Council approved a rezoning of the west one-half of the SE 1/4 of Section 27 from R-1 (Single Family) to E (Estate Residential). This rezoning included the property presently owned by the applicants. When the house was built in 1976, it met all setback requirements of the R-1 zoning in place at that time. However, when the zoning was changed to Estate in 1977, the home became a legally existing non -conforming structure because the increased setback requirements of the Estate zoning district are not met by the existing structure,. The required side yard setback in the Estate district is 301. The existing setback meets the R-1 requirement of 101. The applicant is requesting a 4' Variance which would leave a 6' setback between the house and the west property line. Because of mature tree growth and the slope in back of the house, the applicant has selected the side of the house for the addition due to possible root, and erosion damage that may result from an addition off the rear of the structure. _ _ Y•0. 0 �r41LD€FNE59 _ •;• ••� •:— $ ooUN �.�-1.1, ••rnT. • T ROAD 1n._ 1 .- - P' 199003 . 27240 - 6'r .r.. OAK 22714 -- 4 0 - R . _ "CHAS --- - 'il l^ '.\ .n•v'rrr C list.- Ar.. ��•.Z •'4r; 0 If tryst" ,.1 MP.. �`� ,rr'r ••.� OND ��.��] 3 R al •4 3I .. `list •...,a...•• y� ;!,\ - i'y?�Eow •'" ••r.. ,'y �. . mma POND" _ _ �. C• i "/a6 1. t�;j h.,v=list `�. ,R,`'• 4 ° _ 3 tie di�r�1• ;:;{:;: - A! t •y • ::.�`. r N'. .h • ::: s 4 •. {.I�1Pt"E� •list.I,1°°012—o2..r �` �; P■ --LANE b " /4, i"'• 3 t akLr 6 g U) ur 1 # s a 011-02 w - 1 x .___Rl42,—._ . rl. % . ■ s i $ •. � : nem r . •r-• + v i -:•.1.1.rP bw 1 nem i -_ il• A i` Q$ • e R Y w 4 4. , i ...p �.' 1. ' 'iSiYS�E Y 9 4 �• .,•m Iw gIle E .list i — Tii A•y/ �: -p,tr v°in ylp OAK •/,.f y...�y .mm K 3 r.. I ell It. ' � s:x ,vE2 ',.list• '__---_. M1 a I -A ®R e I! ir-IM04h; F .Woe sti. I ij 4v I -A ®R e I! ir-IM04h; F .Woe sti. I ij Agenda Information Memo December 5; 1989 City Council Meeting PRELIMINARY PLAT E%TENSIONIEPISCOPAL CHURCH E. Extension of Preliminary Plat for Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church --Enclosed on pages J'�Z through Yis a memo and attachments from the Community Development Department. The request for extension of this preliminary plat is for one year and reasons for the extension are outlined in a letter in as part of the attachments. At the November 21 City Council meeting this item was continued to allow the staff to review the conditions that were originally placed on the preliminary plat and determine if any changes ,are appropriate. A one year extension would be appropriate and the specific date of November 30; 1990 is suggested. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an extension on the preliminary plat for Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church with or without modification to the conditions until November 30, 1990 to allow the church to complete its capital fund raising drive and proceed with building plans during calendar year 1990. ILO MEMO'TO: TOM HEDGES,, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: JIM STURM, CITY PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1989 SUBJECT: SAINTS MARTHA AND MARY EPISCOPAL CHURCH ADDITION The City has received a request for an extension of the Saints Martha and Mary Episcopal Church Addition located at the northeast intersection of Diffley Road and• Lexington Avenue. Preliminary plat was granted on December 20, 1988. All City departments have been aware of this request and it was discussed at the in-house development staff meeting. There were no new concerns raised. The letter does not request a specific length for the extension but it appears as though the applicant would like the church to be under construction next year. Therefore, a"one-year extension makes the most sense. Attached is the applicant"'Ps letter and the Council minutes from December 20,, 1988.. ity Planner Attachments JS/mg jj � Ss. Martha & Mary Episcopal Church 1021 Diffley Rd. Eagan, MN 55123 Nov. 14, 1089 Mayor Vic Ellisonand Members of the City Council The City of Eagan City Hall 3830 Pilot Knob Rd. Eagan MN 55122 Dear Mayor Ellison. and Members of the City Council, We am writing'to ask that our church be given an extension on its preliminary plat approval. This approval was first given to us by the City Council at its meeting on Dec. 20, 1988. The preliminary plat is for the Southwest comer of section 23 of Lexington and Diffley roads. We originally thought that we would be able to conduct our capital fund raising program in 1989 and proceed with the next stage of building plans during the Fall of 1989. The development of our fundraising campaign has taken longer than we thought it would take. We are now ready, however, to proceed •with•our fundraising in early 1990.Once we are into this campaign we will know how much we:can spend on our building and what kinds of loans we will need to arrange. Our church building committee is getting back into action,and we are hoping to come to City Hall with the necessary proposals, plans and specifications by the late Spring of 1990. We hope we are able to start construction in mid -summer or early Fall. Thank you for giving consideration to this extension. We willnaturally be happy to answer any questions you might have at this point. Yours truly, The Rev. George H Martin Vicar ,a7'/ AlAe�-' Douglas Wobbema Senior Warden Page 12/EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES December 20, 1988 EPISCOPAL CHURCH ADDITION Community Development Director Dale Runkle introduced the site plan to the Council. Pastor Martin informed the Council he was available for questions. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the Comprehensive Guide Plan amendment from D -III to Public Facilities for the Episcopal Church Addition. All voted in favor. Egan movedy Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve a rezoning from R-4 to Public Facilities for the Episcopal Church Addition. All voted in favor. Egan moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve a preliminary plat entitled Episcopal Church Addition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 19871 shall be complied with: A-1, B-11 B-2, B-31 C-1, C-2, C-4, D-1, E-1, F-1 and G-1. 2. The parking stalls shall be ten feet wide. 3. The detailed landscaping plan will place emphasis on screening the parking areas from the public streets and the apartments to the north. 4. The City shall inspect the single family home to insure all building codes are being satisfied. 5. 'The access onto Lexington Avenue will be finalized with all concerned parties. The proposed access entrance to be constructed to a width of 30 feet. 6. All signage shall conform to Code requirements. 7. The proposed development is subject to additional requirements pertaining to grading, drainage and fire 'hydrant coverage with the final plat phase of development. 8. The finished floor elevation for the worship center shall be at least 984 feet. All voted in favor. I- Councilmember McCrea noted that quality control should be considered. R-88.94 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting OFF -SALE LIQUOR LICENSEICHEERS WINE AND SPIRITS F. License, Off -Sale Liquor for Cheers Rine and Spirits/Scott Liquor Company—Mr. Daniel Herbst, representing Scott Liquor Company and Cheers Wine and Spirits, has applied for an off -sale liquor license at 1995 Rahncliff Court. If the off -sale liquor license is approved, Mr. Herbst plans to open the liquor store at Rahncliff Crossings approximately March 1, 1990. Current City Code language allows one license per 2;000 households. Eagan has exceeded 18,000 households which allows for the issuance of nine (9) off -sale liquor licenses. The City currently has six active licenses and two pending applications. The pending applications include Cheers Wine and Spirits and an application by Richard Barone. For additional information on the location of the ac ive licenses and pending applications, refer to the attached map enclosed on page. Also enclosed on page is a map showing the proposed location of Cheers Wine and Spirits. The Police have completed the investigation and find no reason to deny the application as requested by Mr. Herbst. For additional information on the -off -sale license application, refer to a copy of the application that is provided without page number:. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny an off -sale liquor license application for Cheers Wine and Spirits to be located at the Rahncliff Crossings. (53 12/5/89 OFF- SALE LIQUOR LICENSES OW 23- =7 Y T 0 ACTIVE LICENSES: PENDING APPLICATIONS: I- Big Top Wines & Spirits (Applebaum) 7- Cheers Wine & Spirits 2- Kenny's 8- Richard Barone 3- Great Northern Spirits 4- Big Top Wines & Spirits (Sidco) 5- MGM Warehouse 6- Liquor Shoppe,Inc. DEVELOPMENT PLAN POSED LOCATION ❑ PHASE I F ERS WINE &! SPIRITS "It PHASE Il jet PHASE III Developed By: WUN RECH COMP011ES NAM ROAD ct CROSSINGSk ( UT ep cp Developed By: WUN RECH COMP011ES NAM ROAD ct CROSSINGSk Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/XAVIER'S RESTAURANT FOR ON -SALE LIQUOR G. Conditional Use Permit for Xavier's Restaurant to Allow On -Sale Liquor in a CSC District—A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on November 28 to consider an application submitted by Xavier's Restaurant for a conditional use permit for on -sale liquor. The APC is recommending approval of the conditional use permit. For additional information on this item, refer to a staff reporlZ prepared by Community Development which is enclosed on pages 2 through The APC minutes on this item will be distributed with the Additional Information Packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor at Xavier's Restaurant. /s(�M SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR XAVIER'S RESTAURANT APPLICANT: CARMEN CONESSA LOCATION: LOT 3, BLOCK 1, TOWN CENTER 100 6TH EXISTING ZONING: CBC, PD (COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 28# 1989 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 30, 1989 REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application has been submitted requesting a Conditional Use Permit for on -sale liquor at Xavier's Restaurant located at 1260 Town Centre Drive in the Town Centre Shoppes. The restaurant was granted a conditional use permit in June 1969 to allow for on -sale beer and wine. The restaurant seats approximately one hundred people and is classified by code as a sit-down or Class 1 restaurant. COMMENTS: If approved, this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to: 1. All applicable ordinances. 2. Any necessary permits are approved by the City Police 'Department. I FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - LOT 3, BLOCK It TOWN CENTRE 100 6TH: Based on the study of financial obligations collected in the past and the proposedl uses for the property, no financial obligation is proposed for consideration. ls1 A 7 O TOWN CENTER SHOPPES To" (jnIm Im" I , I�IIIIr.1111 III:I�i�i�i. I: :J. W .' II `\ II !I I I II i IIII�I ! 111'111� li ! III!,. \ 7. ' I I: "o I I I y:�•y V S 1 1 1 i SITE PIAN PROJECT DATA Shv. 347,70S &1. 17.911 acres) Building Ama: �— Handkiln PalkifflM 7 Stalls D_ — 7tioyd.e3 D .< D SITE PIAN PROJECT DATA Shv. 347,70S &1. 17.911 acres) Building Ama: 69,900 Lt. Handkiln PalkifflM 7 Stalls Total Parkins Provided: 393 Stalls 0 w a® O Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/A & R PALLET CRATING H. Conditional Use Permit,, A & R Pallet Crating to Allow Outside Storage in an LI District—A public hearing was held before the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting held on November 28, to consider an application presented by Arthur Mulvihill for a conditional use permit to allow outside storage at the A & R Pallet Crating operation. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to a copy of the staff report enclosed on LLQ through '-t41. The APC minutes on this item will be distributed with the Additional Information Packet on. Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON' THIS ITEM: To approve or deny the conditional use permit as requested by A & R Pallet Crating to allow outside storage in an IrI district. l �I SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A&R PALLET -CRATING APPLICANT: ARTHUR T. MULVIHILL LOCATION: 4841 BISCAYNE AVENUE LOTS 4& 5 p BLOCK 1 r HALLEY I S IST ADDITION EXISTING ZONING: LI (LIMITED INDUSTRIAL) DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: NOVEMBER 281 1989 DATE OF REPORT: OCTOBER 31r 1989 REPORTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY: An application for a conditional use permit has been submitted to allow outside storage at the, A&R Pallet -Crating (formerly Bloomington Cartage) operation located at the northwest end of Biscayne Avenue. Mr. Mulvihill had been granted a conditional use permit for this location in July of 1979. This permit allowed a truck terminal on Lot 4 of Block 1. The terminal was needed for the Bloomington Cartage business that is no longer operating at this site. The current operation at this site is the manufacturing of wooden pallets. COMMENTS: The applicant is seeking a conditional use permit to allow for outside storage of wooden pallets as well as storage of several trailers that will hold and protect pallets from the elements. Outdoor storage is allowed by conditional use in the I-1 Limited Industrial District. The applicant's property is surrounded by property zoned limited industrial on the south, east, and west. The north property line abuts land zoned agricultural. The City Code requires screening along any property line of industrial property that abuts agricultural or residential land. The code states screening shall consist of a fence or compact evergreen hedge not less than six (6) feet in height. However, due to the lay of the land, the property to the north is completely screened from this site. if approved., this Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to the following conditions: 1. All outside storage areas and non -paved areas shall be sodded or,seeded to control dust and run-off. Outside storage of pallets and materials shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 1C) FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - LOTS 4 AND 5o 31ALLEY118 IST ADDITION: Based..on the study of.financial obligations collected in the past and the proposed uses for the property, no financial obligation is proposed for consideration. �� y S, E, 1/4 S EC 0 369 T 27 , R � n�,i^, ',. •.\� -� � __�ii ROAM •1t 2 � 'cinoi •''.� � es' kv 015 -Te !!-moo ,—. At t -a p.— 011-01 012-81 l�2- 017 TR TART 0r 021 T5 Om 96L -&T T�aiL.MR,6 t l.C3 Agenda Information Memo December 5, 1989 City Council Meeting PD AMENDMENT/RAHNCLIFF CROSSINGS I. Planned Development Amendment for Rahncliff Crossings, Inc., to Revise the Overall Pylon Sign Exhibit in the Rahncliff`Crossings Planned Development --A public hearing was held by the Advisory Planning Commission at their last regular meeting.held on November 28 to review the overall pylon sign plan. in the Rahncliff Crossings planned development. The Advisory Planning Commission is recommending approval. For additional information on this item, refer to p copy of a staff report prepared by Community Development enclosed on pagesthrough L(ka. The APC minutes on this item will be distributed with the Additional "Information Packet on Monday. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve or deny a planned development amendment for Rahncliff Crossings, Inc, to revise theoverall pylon sign exhibit. llA CITY OF EAGAN 8UWZCT,: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZMNDXZM (RABNCLIFF CROSSINGS PD) APPLICANT: RAMCLIFF CROSSINGS' INC LOCATION: BW 1/4 OF SECTION 32 EXISTING SONING: PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) DATE OF PUBLIC BEARING: NOVEMBER 28s 1989 DATE OF REPORT,: NOVEMBER 151 1989 COMPILED BY: COXXUNITY DEVELOPXENT DEPARTMENT APPLICATION SUMMARY An application has been submitted requesting a Planned Development Amendment to revise the overall pylon sign plan in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development. A development identification pylon sign was approved where the Burger Ring sign is currently standing, and the Burger Ring pylon was approved directly to the south approximately 200 feet- During the construction process, the Burger Ring sign was erected where the identification Pylon should have been, thus requiring the amendment to the PD. The applicant would ,like to move the Burger Ring sign to the east approximately 120 feet and eliminate the project identification pylon. The distance from the proposed site to the existing pylon for the auto service center to the west would be approximately 190 feet. Code requires a 300 -foot spacing. If approved, a revised planned development exhibit shall be attached to the Planned Development Agreement. 1 (os' C7)9 Jit �� ----..---- ---. -f.--- Cliff Road J r.n.nn�n.n,.nrr, rrrrnr ^•T•'"' �"-'-' Itlllll 11 I i i I I�i i l l o f 1 Irrriirrrl � - i i . ..•---�.� tee» 111111 ull. a ll1l tll i T OIIIIIE�I IqTM IIIIII0 Ra. W7 01)III�III�� 0111111�I III#I10 �,�� e�} IJ G • T gy y � ; O x 61111E•. : f. 2a uonvanlii REIIMINARY.'M', 41,04 IICIIFF PI ,.20. n )aures R.I-IiIII inc:. U) x m m rn 1: < v r z0 z Itlllll 11 I i i I I�i i l l o f 1 Irrriirrrl � - i i . 'e i� li 1 jj::i I " I U) x m m rn 1: < v r z0 z .J.' iA 9 ACCESS ROAD MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR & CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1989 SUBJECT: INFORMATIVE STATUS REPORT/ASSISTED HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FOR DAKOTA COUNTY Enclosed on pages/Z through –4-2L is a copy of the November Status Report for all assisted housing programs and community development programs currently being operated in the City of Eagan and a summary sheet for Dakota County. LETTER TO THE EDITOR(RESPONSE TO WINTER MAINTENANCE OF PARK TRAIL SYSTEM Enclosed on page -0-2--- is a letter that was prepared and sent to This Week and the Eagan Chronicle regarding the City's reasons why the park trail system and adjoining bike paths do not receive winter maintenance. There is also a condensed version of this letter included in the December edition of the city-wide newsletter. YMCA The YMCA Advisory Committee is continuing to meet on a monthly basis and is planning a fundraiser in early 1990 with community programming to follow. METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL MEETING The Eagan/Mendota Heights departure corridor alternative has been under review for several months by the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council. Several weeks ago, Assistant to the City Administrator Hohenstein requested that Eagan be advised as to when the proposed departure corridor alternative is to be heard by MASAC so members of the City Council, staff, media and other community representatives could be present for the discussion and presentation. Unfortunately, the Metropolitan Airports Commission staff scheduled the next Metropolitan Aircraft South Abatement Council meeting for December 5 and appearing on the agenda is the City of Mendota Heights proposed Eagan/Mendota Heights departure corridor alternative. The City Administrator has requested a continuance of this item to the January 23 meeting allowing Eagan to be properly represented. Generally, a summary of the MASAC agenda or minutes is lig provided as a part of the Informative Memo. Due to the importance of this issue, a copy of the entire agenda packet 's enclosed on pages through �=>/ for your review. Also enclosed on page is a copy of a letter that was sent to MASAC Chairperson Walter Rockenstein requesting the continuance. An update regarding the request for continuance will be forthcoming with the Administrative Packet on Monday. EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION TO COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL Our City employees raised in excess of $550 for the Community Action Council to ass' t with meals that were provided for Thanksgiving. Enclosed on pages and ZB6 is a memo that was sent to all employees regarding our donation and also a request from the employees' Sunshine Committee that we provide a donation to the Armful of Love at Christmas. CARTOON The Informative Memo ends with a cartoon enclosed on page /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Status Report for Dakota County** November, 1989 Amount * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. of ASSISTED HOUSING Elderly Family Total (+/-)* Section 8 Existing: Certificates 399 1082 1,481 -53 Vouchers 101 211 312 -12 Moderate Rehab 4 21 25 0 Section 8 New Construction 247 300 547 0 Low Rent Housing 380 205 585 0 235 Home 0 41 41 0 236 Rental 0 526 526 0 TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING 1,131 2,386 3,517 -65 Amount Commercial/ of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly Family Multifamily Total Increase MHFA Local Participation 0 10 0 10 2 MHFA Home Improvement Loan 35 187 0 222 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 70 79 0 149 2 MHFA Home Energy Loan 11 148 0 159 2 Rental Rehab 38 49 5 92 0' CDBG Rehab Loan 94 199 0 293 16 CDBG Rehab Loan - Mobile Home 1 20 0 21 0 MHFA Solar Bank Energy Loan 0 8 0 8 0 312 Loan - Residential 4 15 0 19 0 312 Loan - Commercial/ Mixed Use N/P. N/A 3 3 0 Weatherization 386 1,606 0 1,992 19 TOTAL CUMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 639 2,321 8 2,968 24 * + = Increase/- = Decrease ** Numbers for the City of South St. Paul are included in Assisted Housing, Rental Rehab, and Weatherization, but are excluded from the rest of the Community Development programs; South St. Paul operates separate Community Development programs. Status Report for the City of Eagan November, 1989 ASSISTED HOUSING Section 8 Existing: Certificates Vouchers Section 8 New Construction Low Rent Housing 236 Rental TOTAL ASSISTED HOUSING Amount of Elderly Family Total (+/-)* 31 197 228 -27 20 50 70 -6 0 33 33 0 0 22 22 0 0 144 144 0 51 446 497 -33 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Elderly MHFA Home Improvement Loan 2 MHFA Home Rehab Loan 3 MHFA Home Energy Loan 1 CDSG Rehab Loan 1 Weatherization 6 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 13 * + = Increase/- = Decrease \-q \ Amount of Family Total Increase 14 16 0 3 6 0 12 13 0 8 9 1 70 76 2 107 120 3 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN, MINI JES01A 551221897 PHONE: (6121454 8100 FAX: (61:1) 4548363 To the Editor: MC ELLISON M,v THOMAS EGAN DAVID x, GUSTAFSON PAMELA MCCRFA THEODORE WACH"ER Coemli Meme" THOMAS HEDGE CN Atlmir,111,0.1 EUGENE VAN OVER9EKE Ciry eiepk Residents of Eagan are justifiably proud of their park trail system and adjoining bike paths. Many of the health -conscious joggers and walkers who use the system like to remain active during the winter months. As a result, some residents have expressed concern over the City's policy of not removing snow from the trail system. Originally installed for "three season" use, the trails were not intended to receive winter maintenance for several reasons. First, such maintenance would cost an additional $102,000 for special equipment and upwards of $45,000 per season in operating costs to plow 60 miles of trails. Maintaining the system to a level of service that would probably be demanded by users would be extremely difficult given the unpredictability of snowfalls. Secondly, ground obstructions adjacent to the trails make snow removal very difficult. Junction boxes for cable television and telephone, backyard fences and landscape rocks can make snowplowing very hazardous. In addition, the plows would likely impact sod, small trees, and other vegetation next to the trails since they do not have proper curbing which is required for effective snow removal. Much of the salt and sand required during the winter would generate additional lawn maintenance preblems: for adjacent property owners in the spring. The third major reason the trails do not recei•.e winter maintenance is liability. The City would likely be responsible for injury resulting from accidents on trails if a maintenance program were in effect. The likelihood of such accidents is very high considering the probability of joggers slipping on ice patches. According to the City insurance provider, the City is not legally responsible for injuries on trails where no maintenance program is in effect for the winter months. Trail users can be assured that the City Co-incil will continue to revisit this issue as part of future budget considerations. I encourage residents to contact City Hall if they have any further questions or concerns about this issue. Sincerely, Thomas 1.. Hedges Eagan City Administrator THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer 1--) ID— AGENDA METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETING December 5, 1989 7:30 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on October 24, 1989 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 6. IAM Union Address to MASAC by Dan Lockran 7. City of Mendota Heights Proposed Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Alternative 8. Selection and Vote for MASAC Representatives Stage 3 Utilization Working Group. 9. MAC 1990 Construction Plans 10. MSP Noise b Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS): Update on Arts IIIA radar data Access Agreement with FAA 11. Report of MAC Commission Meeting November 20, 1989 12. Other Items Not on the Agenda 13. Adjournment NEXT MEETING DATE: dANDARY 23, 1989 � �3 FA EG R E & B EN S O N i[OO MOMMCST CENTER RO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA ES.02-3001 ""34 .. .... .". aa•-aoa• am•c •Poo •o.E. cA•...Co. •.00 .e•M.weALL l•wc •ouL[v.o Lo+Re. cca. ,[.� [NSJNO •w e.�w o+e+. ��w.0 o+. c•.a+-�e+e anm•�u ur,v�-+toe •cLcc e••[• •aa-na+ •ncw•rt. Pn-u.. November 10, 1989 Steve Vecchi Metropolitan Airports Commission Box 11700 Twin Cities Airport, Minnesota 55111 Dear Steve: IS 00.:t o .[.uwc "^z 'k o[.+[.. cole�.00 •o cea-.00. a oa. ua-a uc •c.aco •�c. L•e•••a Enclosed for MASAC's records is the original of David Braslau's letter to me requesting that the City of Mendota Heights be placed on the agenda for the December 5, 1989, meeting. As we discussed, this presentation should be placed on the agenda and the material mailed to all MASAC members. Please note that Mr. Braslau is requesting the use of an overhead projector at the meeting. If you cannot provide one, please call Mr. Braslau so that he can arrange to bring one. WHR/cjv 5673w cc: David Braslau Sincerely yours, / Walter H. Rockenstein II P, devid breslau associates. incorporsted 1 31 3 Stn street s,e. • su-te322 • m,nneaool-s. mn 55414 • te,ec none S' 2 331.-157 31 October 1989 Walter Rockenstein, Chairman Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council c/o Faegre b Benson 2500 Norwest Center 90 South 7th St. Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901 RE: Request for Placement on MASAC Agenda Dear Mr. Rockenstein: The City of Mendota Heights has asked that our firm make a presentation to MASAC on a revised proposal for the Eagan/Mendota Heights. Corridor at the ear- liest possible convenience. Formal approval of our agreement to represent the City in this effort will be considered at the November 7, 1989 Council Meeting. I will confirm this with you or let you know immediately if there are anv changes in the current plan. in the meantime., I would like to request that we be placed on the Agenda of the ..ASAC meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December '5, 1989 or the January 1990 meeting, if you feel that would be more appropriate. The presentation would constitute a formal submittal to MASAC of the City of Mendoca Heights proposed °wenn/"erdota Heights Corridor System adopted by the City Council at their meeting of October 3, 1989. The presentation would be made by myself and Robert Collette, Air Traffic Con- sultant, and would involve use of an overhead projector which we could provide if necessarv. The presencarion would provide a quick background of the proposal and the reasons for each of its elements. I assume that some repre- sentarives of the City of Mendota Heights other than the M,1SAC representative may wish to attend the meeting. We will also request at that time that Robert Col' -este be appointed as an interim member of the MASAC Operations Committee should MASAC accept the proposal for review. Attached is a copy of the resolution as adopted by the Mendota Heights City Council. It may be more appropriate to use a signed version if this is to be included in a mailing to MASAC representatives. Please let me know if you have any questions and we look forward to the opportunity to appear before MASAC. Sincerely, David Braslau ?resident cc: James Danielson, City of Mendota Heights Robert Collette AGENDA METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOS ABATEMENT COUNCIL GENERAL MEETTT7G December 5, 1989 7:30 p.m. 6040 28th Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 1. Call to Order, Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of General Meeting on October 24, 1989 3. Introduction of Invited Guests, and Receipt of Communications 4. Technical Advisor's Preferential Runway System Utilization Report and Complaint Summary 5. Persons Wishing to Address the Council 6. IAM Union Address to MASAC by Dan Lockran 7. City of Mendota Heights Proposed Eagan/Mendota Heights Departure Corridor Alternative 8. Selection and Voce for MASAC Representatives Stage 3 Utilization Working Group, 9. MAC 1990 Construction Plans 10. HSP Noise b Operations Monitoring System (ANOMS):' Update on Arts IIIA radar data Access Agreement with FAA 11. Report of MAC Commission Meeting November 20, 1989 12. Other Items Not on the Agenda 13. Adjournment NEXT MEETING DATE: JANUARY 23, 1989 1 -�3 FAEGRE & BENSON 2200 NORwCST CENTER SO SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 25.02'3901 •a/))R')000 [w.[ n50, •.o0 D.C.T11 c•[.e.c.• e.00 .o..Awe•1c .•Ac cou, c.••. 11.11. co. ,c+...... Ho u oe.�.e.o.. .•w a o+. es.aT-�e+e an cxaw] I'm C 'L CLco.�c• •n -u.. November 10, 1989 Steve Vecchi Metropolitan Airports Commission Boa 11700 Twin Cities Airport, Minnesota 55111 Xww Dear Steve: Leeo •c•uRuc •.•L. ]T0 [[v[... ... ...[[+ .1—C. Colo -:Do .0 ...... xo]/ux-eeec •c.c co •�u uL[ua Enclosed for MASAC's records is the original of David Braslau's letter to me requesting that the City of Mendota Heights be placed on the agenda for the December 5, 1989, meeting. As we discussed, this presentation should be placed on the agenda and the material mailed to all MASAC members.. Please note that Mr. Braslau is requesting the use of an overhead projector at the meeting. If you cannot provide one, please call Mr. Braslau so that he can arrange to bring one. WHR/cjv 5673w cc: David Braslau Sincerely yours, Walter H. Rockenstein II dawid bread b aaaooiates. jricorporeted i 3 1 3 Scr screec s. e, su,ce 322 min neeo55414 • te,eo,one 6 1 2 331_4571 oi�s. mn 31 October 1989 Walter Rockenstein, Chairman Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council c/o Faegre b Benson 2500 Norwest Center 90 South 7th St. Minneapolis, MN 55402-3901 RE: Request for Placement on MASAC Agenda Dear Mr. Rockenstein: The City of Mendota Heights has asked that our firm make a presentation to MASAC on a revised proposal for the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor at the ear- liest possible convenience. Formal approval of our agreement to represent the City in this effort will be considered at the November 7, 1989 Council Meeting. I will confirm this with you or let you know immediately if there are any changes in the current plan. In the meantime, I would like to request that we be placed on the Agenda of the `IASAC meeting scheduled for Tuesday, December 5, 1989 or the January 1990 meeting., if you feel that would be more appropriate. The presentation would constitute a formal submittal to MASAC of the City of Mendota Heights proposed Ea nn'Me dota Hei.ehts Corridor System adopted by the City Council at their ber meeting of Octo3, 1989. The presentation would be made by myself and Robert Collette, Air Traffic Con- sulzant, and would involve use of an overhead projector which we could provide if necessary. The presentation would provide a quick background of the proposal and the reasons for each of its elements. I assume that some repre- sentatives of the City of Mendota Heights other than the M,%SAC representative mov wish to attend the meeting. We will also request at that time that Robert Col' -este be appointed as an interim member of the MASAC Operations Committee should MASAC accept the proposal for review. Attached is a copy of the resolution as adopted by the Mendota Heights Citv Council. It may be more appropriate to use a signed version if this is to be included in a mailing to MASAC representatives. Please let me know if you have any questions and we look forward to the opportunity to appear before MASAC. Sincerely, David Braslau President cc: James Danielson, City of Mendota Heights Robert Collette CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 89-115 RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING REVISED PROCEDURES FOR THE EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS IMPLEMENTEDOAND OPROVIDING CAAMORE EQUITABLE DISTNGES SINCE THE COIDOR WAS RST REFLECT RIBUTION OF AIRCRAFT NOISE BETWEEN THE CITIES OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS AND EAGAN WHEREAS, when the Corridor was established, Runway 11L -29R was a short runway used primarily for propeller aircraft with little or no air carrier jet departures, and, WHEREAS, the term "Corridor" is a misnomer since only a southern boundary has been formally defined while the northern "boundary" has continued to move north over time, and WHEREAS, changes in magnetic declination to thenorth have placed flight tracks further to the north each year, WHEREAS, forecast increases in airport operations will eventually overwhelm the corridor and long-range planning appears to be prudent, and WHEREAS, the noise contour reflecting hourly departures (in terms of L10) has continued to move to the north beyond the Metropolitan Council's policy contour, and WHEREAS., Runway 11L now takes an equal share of departures although there is less demand for turns to the north, and, WHEREAS, peak arrivals and departures are more intense under the airline hubbing concept than in the past, and WHEREAS, this leads to required divergence of aircraft departing the parallel runways and with the southern boundary fixed, this forces aircraft further north, and, WHEREAS, realignment of the primary instrument runway at St• andl increases potential conflicts with MSP eastbound departures, WHEREAS, the PRS (Preferential Runway System) as revised by the new Runway Use System places greater emphasis on use of the Corridor for departures which leads to an increase in divergent tracks within the corridor and hence over Mendota Heights; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS, MINNESOTA, that the following changes in aircraft operations within the Eagan/Mendota Heights Corridor be submitted to the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council for evaluation and implementation: PROPOSED EAGAN/MENDOTA HEIGHTS CORRIDOR SYSTEM 1. A 11150 Corridor" shall be defined on the north as a magnetic bearing of 105° from the southeast end of Runway 11L/29R and on the south as a magnetic bearing of 120° from the southeast end of Runway 11R/29L. The final placement of the 150 Corridor.shall be determined by the Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council Operations Committee. 2. The 150 Corridor shall be given first priority for departures from Runways 11R and 11L whenever traffic volumes permit. 3. A "Fanned Corridor" shall be defined on the north as a magnetic bearing of 0900 from the southeast end of Runway 11L/29R and on the south as a magnetic bearing of 150° from the southeast end of Runway 11R/29L. 4. Use of the "Fanned Corridor" shall not be permitted between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. (2200 to 0700 local time). 5. The MSP Tower shall determine when peak departure periods require use of the "Fanned corridor.,, epartus re periods shall not exceed an aggregate maximum of per day between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. 6. The boundariesof the 150 Corridor shall be depicted on radar video maps. 7. A Corridor System 180 -day test shall be conducted to answer the following questions: a) Does the. Corridor System lead to a more equitable distribution of noise between Mendota Heights and Eagan? b) Is the Corridor System operationally feasible? Adopted by the City Council of the City of Mendota Heights this Third day of October, 1989. ATTEST Kathleen M. Swanson City Clerk CITY COUNCIL CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS By Charles E. Mertensctto Mayor C CAV of eaga WALTER ROCKENSTEIN, CHAIR METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL 6040 28TH AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 Re: Dear Rocky: In official action taken at its regular meeting of November 9, 1989, the Eagan City Council adopted the attached resolution concerning the Braslau/Collette Corridor Report. In taking this action, the Council is highly critical of the Report for its distortion of fact and unsupported conclusions. We expect that the City of Mendota Heights will bring this matter forward to MASAC and the MAC in the near future, and we feel strongly that it should not receive endorsement. In taking this action, the Council firmly believes the Study's proposal to be inconsistent with regional land use policy and unnecessary based on operational considerations. What is necessary is for MAC, MASAC, FAA and the Metropolitan Council to move forward to a conclusion on operations which will relate rationally to regional land use policy as it pertains to noise abatement. If you have any questions concerning this action or wish to discuss this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact either Jon Hohenstein of our staff of myself. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely yours., Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Enclosure TLH/vmd THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Athrmahve Action Employer 9�� VIC ELLISON 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD EAGAN. MINNESOTA 5512221897 rHOMAS EGAN PHONE. (612) A54-8100 DAIAD K GUSTAFSON EA%: (612) 45A-8363 PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER =arc. caner. THOMAS HEDGES November 16, 1989 n VEP O EUGENE NF VAN VERBEKf C.n C r. WALTER ROCKENSTEIN, CHAIR METROPOLITAN AIRCRAFT SOUND ABATEMENT COUNCIL 6040 28TH AVE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS MN 55450 Re: Dear Rocky: In official action taken at its regular meeting of November 9, 1989, the Eagan City Council adopted the attached resolution concerning the Braslau/Collette Corridor Report. In taking this action, the Council is highly critical of the Report for its distortion of fact and unsupported conclusions. We expect that the City of Mendota Heights will bring this matter forward to MASAC and the MAC in the near future, and we feel strongly that it should not receive endorsement. In taking this action, the Council firmly believes the Study's proposal to be inconsistent with regional land use policy and unnecessary based on operational considerations. What is necessary is for MAC, MASAC, FAA and the Metropolitan Council to move forward to a conclusion on operations which will relate rationally to regional land use policy as it pertains to noise abatement. If you have any questions concerning this action or wish to discuss this correspondence, please do not hesitate to contact either Jon Hohenstein of our staff of myself. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely yours., Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Enclosure TLH/vmd THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Athrmahve Action Employer 9�� RESOLUTION CONCERNING TEE BRASLAII/COLLETTE CORRIDOR REPORT COMMISSIONED BY TEE CITY OF MENDOTA HEIGHTS Eagan, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights have as their common boundary an area of land use generally compatible with aircraft overflight known as the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor; and, WHEREAS, the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport has promulgated runway use systems including the Preferential Runway System (PRS) which direct the largest proportion of air traffic to the southeast and toward that corridor; and, WHEREAS, the Cities of Eagan and Mendota Heights have expressed a desire in the past to work cooperatively with one another and with airport -related agencies to develop operational procedures which will relate fairly and equitably to that area of land use; and, WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has promulgated policy guidelines for the planning, development and redevelopment of noise impact areas; and, WHEREAS, the City of Mendota Heights commissioned a study of the Corridor through Dave Braslau and ,Associates and Robert Collette; and, WHEREAS, the Braslau/Collette Corridor Study proposes a dramatic change in corridor procedures which would introduce broad new areas of the City of Eagan to severe noise impacts for which the noise compatible corridor was developed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eagan finds the Bras lau/Collette report to be factually flawed and holding out conclusions which are not supported by historical fact, regional policy and operational considerations; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan strongly opposes the Braslau/Collette study and its proposed operational system and directs staff to represent such position in the strongest possible terms to the City of Mendota Heights, the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Airports Commission, the Federal Aviation Administration and other interested parties; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan urgently requests that the Metropolitan Council take an active role in the resolution of the Eagan -Mendota Heights Corridor issue as it directly pertains to the relationship between urban municipalities, the regional transportation system and regional land use policy; and, V' 1� BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Mendota Heights be urged to set aside the Braslau/Collette study; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Eagan invite the City of Mendota Heights to participate in direct discussions of this issue; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City request that MASAC release its corridor report and move forward with its mediation of this issue. CITY OF CITY CO By: —55" Attest: Motion Made By: McCrea I Cle Seconded By: Gustafson Those In Favor: All Those Opposed: None CERTIYICATION I, E. J. VanOverbeke, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a re lar a ting thereof assembled this 9th day of November E an er a e, City Clerk Ci y of Eagan r. a NOISE COMPLAINT SUMMARY 1988 Wold-Chanberlain 1897 Run -ups 4 Miscellaneous 11 7MAL 1934 1989 Wold-Chanierlain 1268 Ru -upa 3 Secondaries: 15 Airlake 0 Anoka 0 Crystal 0 Plying Cloud 3 Lake Elmo 0 St. Paul 10 WrAL 1284 OPERATIONS S[PWRY crosstown 494 MSP RUNWAY USAGE OC70BER 1989 Minnesota River t PC m KEY 9 - Approx. i of Scheduled gx-rations (Carriers and Ccmmnters ) 1988 / 1989 Air Carrier 638 627 conuter (3rd 156 181 level) General Aviation 137 135 Military 15 7 Air Freight 63 51 7u 1009 1001 (Average Daily Operations) crosstown 494 MSP RUNWAY USAGE OC70BER 1989 Minnesota River t PC m KEY 9 - Approx. i of Scheduled gx-rations (Carriers and Ccmmnters ) OCTOBER 1989 mcum OF: EMILY zBfwV ��+ NY�YA+J USE OF ISYS 1y�Q�L SCSE�� AII�tAFT CARRIER ��.p W-+'+J1u� F'iiElCal�' 71 38.78 7,138 5,405 1,683 50 29 51.68 4,783 3,675 1,039 69 22 0.2% 4 4 0 0 04 9.58 757 639 80 38 TUM ARRIVALS 12,682 9,723 2,802 FLYS RUMMY 8 OSE OF ISYS 'row SCEEDCLFD AIItQ7AFT CARRIER CQII71fR 17MCMT 11 68.38 8,232 6,328 1,772 132 29 23.08 3,923 2,973 933 17 22 8.78 537 419 105 13 04 0.08 0 0 0 0 TOM DEPAR7CRES 12,692 9,720 2,810 162 l 8i OCTOBER 1989 NOISE COMPLAINTS by City (Landing and Takeoff) and Time of Day Citv IAnding Takeoff Apple Valley 0 1 Bloomington 0 19 Burnsville 0 4 Cottage Grove 1 1 Eagan 46 266 Eden Prairie 1 0 Edina 2 3 Farmington 1. 0 Inver Grove Heights 3 11 Lakeville 0 1 Mendota Heights 18 259 Minneapolis 217 286 Minnetonka 4 4 Montgomery 0 2 New Hope 1 0 Oakdale 0 1 Plymouth 0 2 Richfield 3 26 Roseville 0 2 St. Louis Park 11 2 St. Paul 18 30 Stillwater 0 3 Sun Fish Lake 0 14 West St. Paul 0 3 South St. Paul 0 3 TOTAL 325 943 Time of Day Time Number 2400 - 0559 49 0600 - 1159 318 1200 - 1559 205 1600 - 1959 336 2000 - 2359 376 TOTAL 1284 l�-3 MSP INTERNATIONAL COMPLAINT SUMMARY OCTOBER 1989 BREAKDOWN OF NATURE OF COMPLAINT BY DATE Excess Early/Lt Lou Structual Heli- Sround Runuo Freo- RON Noise Flisht Flying Disturb. copters Noise uency Total DATE l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10/01/89 49 0 7 0 0 0 0 3 109 10/02/89 31 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 36 10/03/89 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 13 10/04/89 21 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 10/05/89 34 0 4 0 1 3 0 0 42 10/06/89 24 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 10/07/89 13 3 l 0 0 0 0 0 17 10/08/89 V 0- l 0 0 1 0 1 25 10/09189 35 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 43 10/10/89 44 1D 5 0 0 0 0 2 61 10/11/89 26 1 6 0 0 1 0 6 40 10/12/89 20 3 6 0 0 1 0 2 32 10/13/89 13 1 8 0 078 3 28 10/14/89 34 3 2 0 0 0 d B 47 10/15/89 35 2 2 0 0 0 0 11 7D 10/16/89 17 1 6- 0 0 0 1 1 26 10/17/89 14 2 1 0 0 0 0 2 19 10/18/99 9 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 18 :0/19189 IB 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 :0/20/89 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 12 10/21/89 7 0 2 0 0 1 2 1 24 10/22/89 41 0 4 0 1 3 0 2 51 10/i /B9 19 5 2 0 0 0 0 2 ZB 1D/24/89 33 1 3 0 0 2 0 9 48 10/:5189 83 14 6 0 0 3 0 20 126 10/26/89 55 13 12 0 0 2 0 18 100 10/27/89 26 12 2 0 0 1 0 4 45 10/28/89 35 1 6 0 0 0 0 2 44 10/29/89 43 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 50 10/30/89 25 5 1 1 0 0 0 5 37 10/31/89 18 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 2B TOTAL 1: 934 93 108 1 3 23 3 119 1284 TOTAL I: 72.71 7.21 8.41 0.11 0.22 1.81 0.21 9.31 100.01 MEMO TO: ALL EMPLOYEES FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: NOVEMBER 29p 1989 SUBJECT: HOLIDAYS Thanks to all of you for a most successful Thanksgiving donation drive. Between the groceries, turkey certificates and individual donations directly to the Community Action Council, City of Eagan employees raised in excess of $550. When our donation was dropped off at the CAC, one of the volunteers remarked that we were "the answer to a prayer." I'm certain your own Thanksgiving dinners tasted just a little bit better because of it! I've checked with the Community Action Council and they provided 625 meals for Thanksgiving this year. They depleted the food stuffs on their shelves to provide that many meals and even had to go out and purchase turkey certificates and other items to fill in. They're hoping to replenish their shelves between now and Christmas when the next big crunch comes for assistance. And speaking of Christmas. Attached is a memo from the Sunshine Club regarding the Armful of Love program. I know it's a difficult time of the year to come up with extra money but if it's hard for us, imagine what it must be like for the families who need this assistance. I hope you'll consider participating yet once again. Give yourself a gift this Christmas: the gift of giving. City Administrato TLH/kf p r November 28,1989 TO: ALL EMPLOYEES FROM: SUNSHINE COMMITTEE RE; ARMFUL OF LOVE - CHRISTMAS, 1989 This year marks the beginning of what, we hope, will be an annual sharing of our resources with area families at Christmas time. The Community Action Council has over 1000 families which will have a happier Christmas because somebody cares. There are several ways we can participate: 1. Sponsor a family and purchase clothes, games or toys for each family member. An average cost per item is $25.00. Information on specific families is forthcoming. 2. Make love baskets for a family or love cans/boxes for a Mom, Dad or Teenager. Love baskets include: flour/salt 5A sugar brown/powdered sugar shortening or oil peanut butter felly box oatmeal 24 popcorn bag hard candy roll aluminum foil,plastic wrap wax paper, sandwich bags dish detergent, 4 bars hard soap paper products: napkins, towels, toilet paper, tissues bag of chocolate chips Love can/box includes: 1 box band aids deck of cards a wash cloth a small towel a hot pad sample size cosmetics, toiletries ball point pens, pencils note cards scotch tape key chain mug roll of candy Christmas ornament book of stamps etc. 3. Give a $10 food certificate or miscellaneous food items. Please sign up individually, in groups or by department. The Christmas gifts should be brouqht to Marilyn, Liz, Karen, Lorene. of Dorothy at 'City Hall and to Nancy at Public Works. between Dec. 6 - 15. 63 CITY HALL Sorry, we're no longer involved in snow plowing, redevelopement, recycling, or public service . . . Now all we do is ATTEND KEETINGS! ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING EAGAN, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 5, 1989 CITY ATTORNEY Item 1. Executive Session to Consider Attorney/Client Privileged Information Regarding Bieter vs.. City of Eagan Lawsuit CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Snowmobile Usage Item 2. Establish Date for Special City Council Workshop DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Contract 89-18, Approve Change Order #1 (Lexington Way -Street Improvement) Item 2. Project 461, Reschedule Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road Improvements -O'Neil Property) /YY MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1989 SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY Item 1. Executive Session to Consider Attorney/Client Privileged Information Regarding Bieter vs. City of Eagan Lawsuit --The City Attorney is requesting an executive session immediately following the City Council meeting to discuss privileged information regarding the Bieter vs. City of Eagan lawsuit. The meeting will be held in the office of the City Administrator. CITY ADMINISTRATOR Item 1. Snowmobile Usage --Each year the City has reviewed policy regarding the operation of snowmobiles within the community. The present policy allows 1) snowmobiles to operate only within the City going from/to home and the use of snowmobile trails that are located in a regional park and 2) the snowmobiles must operate adjacent to City curbs or ride in ditch sections of County roads. Both the Director of Parks and Recreation on behalf of the Advisory Parks and Recreation Commission and the Chief of Police are raising concerns ,regarding whether snowmobile usage should be allowed any longer within the community. Please refer to their memos enclosed on pages � throughL3 It is certainly appropriate for the City Council to discuss this item, however, since it was not placed on the formal agenda and any change in policy would impact residents throughout the community; it is suggested that the item be placed on a future City Council agenda. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: After discussion on this item, indicate a desire to maintain the existing policy or place on a future agenda a new policy that would restrict or prohibit the use of snowmobiles within the City. Item 2. Special City Council Workshop --The second phase of the R-4 Study that was commissioned by the City Council to meet with property owners and consider a downzoning or change in the Comprehensive Guide Plan designation for certain R-4 properties has been completed. The Director of Community Development is ready to present the information to the City Council for their review: The City Administrator has completed the Public Works Enterprise Fund Budget and would like to present that part of the budget, re -present the Equipment Revolving Fund and finalize any items within the General Fund at a workshop session so the 1990 General Fund and Public Works Enterprise Fund Budget can be adopted at the December 19 City Council meeting. Also, the City Administrator will present some ideas regarding health insurance, wage rates for non -collective bargaining personnel and request direction on both the Police Association and clerical contracts that are currently under negotiation. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To establish a date for a special City Council workshop session. The date of Tuesday, December 12 is recommended. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS Item 1. Contract 89-18,.Approve Change Order #1 (Lexington Way -Street Improvement)- -This Change Order consists of three major parts described as follows: Part A: Lower existing water services to maintain minimum 7' of cover due to lowering of road bed. (Add $1,343.59) Part B: Remove existing 12" water main stub and valve in Diffley Road due to conflict with new water reservoir transmission water main. ($625.02) Part C: Remove driveway culverts and adjust existing sanitary manhole castings to accommodate change in boulevard grades to match existing lawn areas. (Add $1,774.55) Parts A & B will be the responsibility of the City's Water Utility Source & Supply Fund, and Part C will be added to the assessable costs of this project. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To approve Change Order #1 to Contract 89-18 (Lexington Way - Street Improvement) and authorize the Mayor to execute all related documents. Item 2. Project 461, Reschedule Public Hearing (Yankee Doodle Road Improvements - O'Neil Property) --On November 21, the City Council formally scheduled a public hearing for December 19, 1989, to discuss the proposed final assessments associated with the above -referenced project against the Robert O'Neil property. At that same meeting, the Council also scheduled a public hearing for Project 443 (Trunk Storm Sewer - O'Neil Property.). While both projects related to property owned by Robert & Grace O'Neil, individual legal descriptions of properties were not thesame for both projects. Subsequently, there was an error in the legal description used for notices published in the legal newspaper. / 90 Subsequently, it will be necessary for the Council to cancel the public hearing scheduled for December 19 for Project 461 and reschedule it to be held on January 2, 1990, for the referenced property. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED ON THIS ITEM: To cancel the scheduled public hearing of December 19, 1989, for Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road - O'Neil Property) and reschedule for January 2, 1990, for Parcels 010-56 and 010-77 in the south half of Section 10. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges u!uEGIM-W►I�i1Ti TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: KEN VRAA, DIRECTOR OF PARKS & RECREATION DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1989 RE: SNOWMOBILE USE The purpose of this memo concerns the question of allowing snowmobiles to operate within the City, given the existing ordinance. The existing ordinance provides for snowmobile operation, with certain provisions. Two key provisions are (1) they operate only within the City going from/to home and the use of snowmobile trails that are located in a regional park or to the south of Eagan, (2) they stay adjacent to City curbs or ride in ditch sections of County roads. Now that major County roads such as Cliff, Pilot Knob and Diffley have been upgraded, there is no ditch section available. Consequently, with few exceptions, it is almost impossible to ride (legally) from Eagan to the County Parks or trail sections to the south. Therefore, the question is should the City continue to keep the existing ordinance, or should the City recognize the improbability of legally riding in the City, and simply prohibit snowmobiles within the City? This issue has been raised by the public and informally by members of the Police Department. Perhaps we can get together with Chief Geagan on how best to proceed with this issue. KV/bls cc: Pat Geagan, Chief of Police police department ®F 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Phone: (612) 454-3900 December 1„ 1989 TO: KEN VRAA, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR FROM: PAT GEAGAN, CHIEF OF POLICF%� SUBJECT: SNOWMOBILE.USE PATRICK J. GFAGAN Chet m Pallr< KENNETH D. ASZMANN aae uli OaPtO VAC ELLISON Maw THOMAS EGAN _ DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Cantil Members THOMAS HEDGES CKyF ne dm EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CtM Glen For several years, the Eagan Police Department Administration has felt it would be appropriate to prohibit snowmobiles within the City. As indicated in your memo, places where snowmobiles are now allowed are so limited that one almost needs to violate City Code by getting to the location. The current code tends to be violations occur off the roadway Officer. By the time violators in compliance with City Code. difficult to enforce, as many and out of site of a Patrolling reach a roadway, they tend to be If I can be of any further assistance in changing the ordinance to prohibit snowmobiles, please contact me. Patrick J. Geagan Chief of Police PJG:lb / 93 THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOL OF STRENGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE E)W' ............ 0: i., "M NNE$( �- T -A, . .. .......... 1, 19 A regular meeting of th4��)�agan Cit.y.'�.Obuncil was held on Tuesday, November 21, 1989, at the Eag$i":::,ftpj-qVa:1 Center. Present were Mayor Ellison and Councilmembers Wachter::-,--:7:::-:i-g-an, Gustafson and McCrea. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Dale Runkle, Public Works Director Tom Colbert, and City Attorney James Sheldon. ........... AGENDA '::::: inf 6 ... i .. d the council that the City Administrator Tom Hedges. rae following items should be continued.: Consent Agenda Items - F (Final Plat, Stratford Oaks) and I (Amen&'aint tci::�'evelopment Contract, Hills of Stonebridge II) and Hear.'Ings - B (Project 443, Final Assessment Hearing O'Neil Sewer). He also stated that after the presentation to Unisys, there would be a special recognition for a recent winner of the Cash for Trash Program. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in..favor. favor. ............ November 9. 1989. Councilmember Egan reques.te.d::'a::'h :range on page 2, paragraph 1, the third sentence should read..Obb . i . 1 , ncilmember Egan asked if the drug problems were as serious as s Police Chief Geagan thought." He also requested an addition on page 21, paragraph 1, the first sentence should read "Mayor Ellison felt that $100,000 Per acre for park property was too much." Councilmember Gustafson queA.I.OR45: regarding "ENAC" on page 16, paragraph 2. The first 66hten , pe is changed to read "Cindy Ellis (ENAC - Eagan Noise Abatement coj&fiitted�'.::'explained that ENAC was a noise abatement citizens, group." McCrea moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the minutes for the November 9, 1989 regular Council meeting as amended. All voted in favor. November 14, 1989. Ellison moved, McCrea seconded, the mo ion to approve the minutes for the November 14, 1989 sOq meeting as presented. All voted in favor. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 2 SPECIAL RECOGNITION 0 .,.UNISYS 'CO iiPORATION/HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOLi6:;::it7A&2�}: CpI;LECTION Kris Hageman presented the recognition award. She recapped the day's activities and the amounts collected. Roger Martin (Unisys - Manager - Environmental Management) reported that the household hazardous waste collection day,was a good cause and he hoped it would be an annual event. Mayor E113award. CASH FOW TRASH:::: Kris Hageman presented the::<'Ca:sh for Trash award to Victoria Jabbra. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT/CINNAMON RIDGE ADDITION REQUEST TO CONVEY PRIVATE STREETS FOR PUBLIC MAINTENANCE Public Works Director Tom Colbert introduced the item and presented the staff report..;.,.., He stated that representatives were informed of the Problemsiora ected with City maintenance. He recommended denial of the request ::::::::::::::::::::::.:,..... Councilmember McCrea asked ::`Chat wop W::;happen if the request were denied. Mr. Colbert stated thiat::::::ttfii:::::fiomeowners must maintain the streets. Councilmember Egan cor4ftn.ted''that the work would be assessed against the landowners' prFip?rties and that the homeowners could do the work cheaper themselves. Councilmember Wachter questioned the size of the cul-de-sac. Mr. Colbert explained the dimensions. Councilmember Wachter pointed out that it was City policy that...;; Ci;ty.,.,.,...specifications be met. Mayor Ellison and Councilmember:;:::::;gan:::;greed: Councilmember Gustafson recommended denial in the future for....private.streets. Rick Matheson, 4585 Horizon Cittle,Was present for the Cinnamon Ridge discussion. He pointed out::::::;that:::::::be did not reside in the development but had rental properties. He ,requested City maintenance of the streets and listed his reasons. He pointed out that the residents did not have any money and that the streets did not meet standards. He further stated that the City had allowed the streets to be built. Councilmember Gustafson asked if the'::Yesidents would be willing to be assessed for the upgrad'e;;: Mr:;:::;#Satheson stated the residents would accept special assessiatts:::;:::Ciiiincx:lmember Egan reported that the City allowed the private streets because it expected the Homeowners' Association to maintain the*X: He felt there should be a better escrow fund. Councilmember McCrea commented that the developer was responsible and not the homeowners. There was further discussion regarding the street maintenance. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 3 Councilmember Gustafson ':...ggested a:>ieighborhood meeting to work out a plan. Councilmember Mtl0'raa::guest'�oned if a delay would create objections. Public Works Dirdbt'6r:::Toii Colbert stated he was unsure. Councilmember McCrea reported that HUD owned 60% of the development. City Administrator Tom Hedges felt that Councilmember Gustafson's approach was sound and stated..,. that questions could be pursued. Councilmember Wachter fel::t::::::::>;saiTi:; set a bad precedent. Councilmember Egan felt tkieY rre ........ ed for consent from several associations. Wachter moved, Egan seconded the motion to deny the request to convey private streets and Ciiil.. ..ac1.1, r Public maintenance within the Cinnamon Ridge Addition. All,voted::ih favor. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT/ ARCHITECT SELECTION/BLACKHAWK PARK SHELTER BUILDING City Administrator Tom;:;.Hedges introduced the item and informed the Council that the firm:::;o ::::;.:,Schwarz/Weber was recommended for selection. Park and Recreations::`Parr!. Ken Vraa explained the selection process. Councilmember Egan reported;;;'that::10, warz/Weber had done excellent work in the past. He further::::stated that Bob Vanney's office was located in Eagan. Mr. Vraa,:.commented that Vanney's office also did excellent work and that the decision was a tough choice. Councilmember McCrea asked if the selection was just for the Blackhawk Park shelter. Mr. Vraa stated there were currently two proposals with three other:..Stielt.ers...:.Councilmember McCrea requested the cost of operation for::;:;pazJES:::Mayiii::Ellison commented the City should not reinvent the wheel with redesigned shelters. Gustafson moved, Wachter secoli0ed, ;:::the motion to approve the selection of Schwarz/Weber to :perforiti:;:;park shelter design of Blackhawk Park and design/construction::administration for three additional City parklands. All voted in favor. LEXINGTON POINTE 4TH & 5TH ADDITIONS/ PARK ACQUISITION/TRAPP.FARM PARK Bill Ipson, 4340 Hamilton, presentea'a petition regarding Trapp Park. He requested the City,:,P. and the sled hill. He read the petition to the Coilb&M-H �® .0.8ted the City Council take prompt action and urged passage of a tree ordinance. He explained there were 69 signatures on the pe�ition and that Tri -Land Development had developed their neighborhorld:. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 4 ...... Councilmember Gustafson :::.;Vestioned ;:::the petition language. Mayor Ellison pointed out that a13::;of the h33 was not park property. Mr. Ipson commented that the petiti3tiiies:;:fiayts been led to believe that the park would remain as is. COu'fid-Ithdkber Wachter stated he felt the developer needed to protect the trees which were close to the street. Councilmember McCrea pointed out that the trees would be removed when homes were built. City Administrator Tom Hedges explained that several options were being,_explored and. that the item would be back before the Council at one of f;:iiesrt:?;#Ysp::Cquncil meetings. CONSENT'=AGENDA i:[: A. Personnel Items. 1. Health Insurance Providers for 1590. Councilmember McCrea asked if the City paid for the entire family coverage. City Administrator Tom Hedges replied that the City did pay for the entire family coverage and that both union and non-union compared to other municipality.. ,Costs. It was recommended to apprtive:;tbe.:..group health (including adult preventive dental), Med-Centers.:dnd VIM.Health Insurance proposals as the three health insurance plans::::which,.,.w;ill: be offered by the City of Eagan to its employees for 2. Lead Construction Inspdcto"r. It was recommended to approve the appointment of William Bruestle as lead construction inspector for the City of Eagan. B. Plumbers Licenses. It was recommended to approve the plumbers licenses for Andreasen Plumbing & Heating and Wyllie Plumbing. C. City Administrator Tom Hedges stated the date was set for December 5, 1989 at 8:00 p.m. with the reserve date of December 19, 1989. It was recommended to approve the date:::Of December 5, 1989 as the official date for the public hearing ::tb consider the proposed increase in property taxes.:.:::far::::::;7990::::: }d December 19, 1989 as the alternate date if. }::>tlt:::;::ieeiled; both meetings to begin a+ C • fl f1 n m _ EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 5 It was recommended to `a.i'�knowledge:completion of Project 88-UU (Dart Transit - Utilities)the release of related financial securities subject to appropriate warranty provisions. E. It was (Blue Ridge release of I7 .7 Li CC Lo auu �..iii-icci . recommended to4-6k3i0 3?'p �jB..completion of Project 87 -II Addition - Streets ::and t3 �lities) and authorize the related financial a.6.Curities subject to appropriate City Administrator Tom Hedges it matter should be continued indefinitely. It was recommended Stratford Oaks. G. It 5th Add H. the Council that the to continue indefinitely the final plat for It was recommended Addition. to approve the final or Whispering Woods plat for Mardelann I. Amendment to Development Contract Hills of Stonebridge II. City Administrator Tom-::iiiige5:iiioxiled the Council that the matter was to be continued to ::the December 5, 1989 City Council meeting. It was recommended to continu*:the aisendment to the development contract for the Hills of Stonebridge II to include a revised Exhibit B, to the December 5, 1989 City Council meeting. Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to approve the consent agenda items as amended, and authorize their implementation. All voted in favor. DEPART1+gT::'ff D'-0U53XESS Mike Reardon (Cable Commission) presented mugs to the Council. Fire Chief Southorn informed the Council that the aerial repair matter had been settled. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 6 LEXINGTON PARKWAYfQRAINAGE,:t►SEMENT VACATION City Administrator Tom Hedtj2s'iitroduced the item. Public Works Director Tom Colbert presented the information to the Council. McCrea moved, Egan seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve the vacation of.,.the drainage easement as described over portions of;::::7a4kG::8:::::9::::; 10 and 11, of Block 2, Lexington Parkway Addition, and aiitUbr zd:::the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. All voted i'::favor. PROJECT 443/O'NEIL:;.�::TRUNK{:;;STORM SEWER/ FINAL :1kSEFSMt:tARING City Administrator Tom Hedges recommended cancelling the final assessment hearing and rescheduling the matter for December 19, 1989. Gustafson moved, Wachter seconded, the motion to cancel the public hearing regarding the...,_final assessment roll for Project 443 (O'Neil - Trunk Storm Sew6tl::::ai7d reschedule the matter for a new public hearing on December 19, 199=4:i::Ax:l;..voted in favor. SPECIAL HUNTING SEASON::PERMIT/,it1CJ3ARD MAURER, JR. City Administrator Tom 414iw .ekplained to the Council that City Code needed clarification. He':pointed out that Mr. Maurer had not yet met with the Police Department but that Police Chief Geagan recommended approval contingent upon police department review. He further pointed out that NML may own the property. Councilmember Gustafson favor.ed::;the;.:Maurer request. Councilmember Wachter felt bow and arrow hilikY?q::;ws::#1tit: as dangerous but that the hunting in Eagan was piece-mea1....C'6uncilmember Gustafson felt the Council should reverse its motion :;regarding the DNR issue. Councilmember Egan commented that riow and:::arrow hunting in the river area was not as efficient as slug !i#ntinq::He stated he did not have a problem with the issue. Egan moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve regulations that allow for a special deer hunt with a bow and arrow as requested by Richard Maurer, Jr. for properties owned by Harold Becker, Jerry Scott Krueger and Richard Maurer, subject;to the police department's review. Gustafson, Ellison, Egan and McCrea voted in favor; Wachter voted against. COVENTRY PASS SECOND ADDITION/PRELIMINARY PLAT City Administrator Tom Hedges and Coihmunity Development Director Dale Runkle introduced the matter. RAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 ......... ............... ............... Page 7 ........... .... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Gustafson moved, McCrea:::::::.reconded,.:::::::..the motion to approve the i -:-d Addition as presented by preliminary plat for Covent-....:::.'ass::::::... United Mortgage Corporation, subj:dixt-'::td:'the following conditions: 1. These standard conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council action on September 15, 1987 shall be complied with: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C3, C5, El. 2. No direct drivewaya'c'de":::::; odd Road shall be allowed. Forty -foot setbacks shall be requiet . d aloA;q:::Dodd Road. 3. The development is requ ' i ' k& ' to iiiintain a maximum depth of 8 :."t of feet of cover on the exist in the southwest corner the development. 4. The development is responsible for any damage which may occur to any existing City public utility line which results from the proposed site grading and development. 5. The development will::::-be:j::required to match the existing street grades provided in the adjoin development. 6. The development is rep'ired to::s;Where to the City's maximum 3:1 slope criteria. 7. The development ii::�:i?64uired to provide storm sewer to adequately accommodate the storm water runoff which is currently conveyed by the rural ditch section along Dodd Road. S. The development will be required to provide emergency overland outlets from all low areas. 9. A storm sewer outlet is required for Block 4 to collect the storm water runoff water in the backyard lo.w area. 10. A 50 foot half right-of-way:AJ reg" zed for Dodd Road. 11. The development is required to provide sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main stubs to all adjacent properties as determined by City staff. All voted in favor. MINNESOTA -:4.0 , U.RNAL::A-RJTICLE "DEFINING A CORRiW::.V0,.R::AikRAFT DEPARTURES" .... I.:_ .......... City Administrator Tom Hedges requiisted Council direction and asked if Eagan staff should also prepar . 6 .'-an article. councilmembers were in agreement that the City should draft an article for EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 8 publication in a future copy of the M}nnesota Journal representing the City's view of the::;.agan/Mendota Heights corridor. City Administrator Tom Hedges intorSle(i;;:::;:ti2:;:: Council that staff would prepare the article. PROJECT 461/YANKEE DOODLE ROAD/O'NEIL PROPERTY REVISED FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING Public Works Director it:CciZt7ea+t:ktp9ated the Council regarding the background of the matter. -. - McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to receive the revised final assessment roll fa:::projeet 461 (Yankee Doodle Road - Streets and Utilities) andse#aeiil `a::p.lc hearing for December 19, 1989, as it pertains to Parcels 010-56:2i1id 010-77, in Section 10. All voted in favor. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRADE Tom Hedges distributed_.....information concerning the Minnesota Department of Trade and requested::direction by the Council. McCrea moved, Gustafson seconded:i:::the motion to unanimously recognize the importance of high technolpgy industries to the local, state and national economies;,.;ree4ga:ze the beneficial impact of international trade and compet�t:loh`' on the economic growth and development of Minnesota's:;::::tdchnology-intensive industries; to strongly commit to the appropriate utilization of the Unisys Semi -conductor facility; and to commit to facilitating productive investment in the Unisys facility, and warmly welcome the important contribution that investment in the facility would make to both the local community and statewide..econPulic..g.roWth. All voted in favor. COVNdit DISCUS'S'I'ON There was discussion regarding the trail plowing policy. Councilmember McCrea felt the Couno. l shQi# d not revisit the matter. Councilmember Egan agreed. City Administrator Tom Hedges informed the Council there would be an executive session after the Council meeting regarding threatened litigation. Councilmember Wachter asked for a ;status report regarding the tree ordinance. City Administrap17$t::Vtitor,:,:,:.>:.o3R..:::::Hedges replied that the ordinance was on hold pending ion. Councilmember Egan informed the Counc;il:';of a public hearing which was scheduled for December 6, 1989 to co#$ider the Seneca project at the State Senate hearing. EAGAN CITY COUNCIL MINUTES November 21, 1989 Page 9 Councilmember McCrea asked if all letters from citizens were put in personnel files. City Admib!4trator To1a:Hedges replied yes. Councilmember McCrea reii&A tY that the training of public officials was crucial in such matters as the Inver Grove Heights' situation. Councilmember McCrea had concerns regarding transitional housing and felt the City should nct::s:wabusing people. She felt the City should help people become"'seifl—;, ient. Councilmember McCrea felt tha;:police::,department needed cultural sensitivity training. Wachter moved, Gustafson seconded, the motion to approve the checklist dated November 21, 1989 in the amount of $483,744.69. All voted in favor. :AZJ.QUT?NMENT Wachter moved, McCrea seconddtiy:::>the motion to adjourn the November 21, 1989 City Council:ajieeting- aV:2:25 p.m. to the Executive Session. All voted in favor. OF EAGAN City Clerk i "THE MORNING AFTER" December 5, 1989 "The Morning After" is an extremely brief report of the action that was taken by the Eagan City Council at a regular meeting held on December 5, 1989. There are no details reported in this account; however, the action taken by the City Council on each of the agenda items and each of the other business items is reflected. DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS w * * w 1. A resolution was approved requesting a continuance of the MASAC item concerning the presentation of the Mendota Heights study to their January 23 meeting. 2. Payment was authorized to Cable TV North Central from retained franchise SM- fees for the installation of cable service, both I -Net and Sub -Net, to Fire Stations 4 and 5 at the reduced cost of $6,063.66. 3. The Dakota County Highway 5 -Year Capital Improvement Program was approved as modified. 4. The Mission Statement as developed by the Eagan Police Department was �ii� approved. �. Direction was given to City staff to prepare a policy/ordinance disallowing snowmobile usage in the City. CONSENT AGENDA Aadt 6. The resignation of Patrol Officer Tomma A. Freundschuh was accepted effective December 17, 1989. 7. The creation of the position of Investigative Sergeant in the Police Department was approved effective in December 1989, and approval was given to the appointment of Sergeant Ken Conyers to this position. 8. The appointment of Officer Steven Grimm to the position of Patrol Sergeant was approved effective in December 1989. 9. A $.50 per hour incentive for all Winter Recreation Leaders who complete !� the season was approved. 10. Approval was given to the attached list of persons as Winter Recreation Leaders for the 1989-90 winter season. 14 An amusement devise license for Summit Amusement for 37 amusement machines, at Pockets located at 2020 Silver Bell Road was approved. A resolution requesting a MnDOT speed limit study (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Cliff Road to Diffley Road) was approved. The amendment to the development contract for the Hills of Stonebridge II was continued indefinitely. Acceptance of the barn donated to the City by West Publishing was approved 15. Approvals were given to 1) the application for an exemption from lawful gambling license for the Transportation Club of St. Paul and Minneapolis and 2) a waiver to allow the State to grant the license as soon as possible. 16 dVr 17 L 18 19 20 21 Tr 22 23 24 25 26 The final plat for Town Centre 100 5th Addition (Waterford Apartment Project) was continued indefinitely until such time as all documentation is in order. The final plat for George W. Giles Addition was approved. Completion of Contract 88-10 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park 9th and 10th Addition -Streets 6 Utilities) was acknowledged and the 7th and final payment to Richard Knutson, Inc. was authorized. Completion of Contract 88-30 (South Oaks Addition -Streets & Utilities) was acknowledged and the 8th and final payment to Landwehr Heavy Moving, Inc. in the amount of $9,225.14 was authorized. Completion of Contract 88 -KK (Community of Joy Church -Utilities) was acknowledged. Completion of Contract 85-R (UPS -Utilities) was acknowledged. Completion of Contract 88-32 (Well #12-Pumphouse & Facilities) was acknowledged and the 5th and final payment to Shingobee Builders, Inc, in the amount of $12,337.71 was authorized. The request to vacate a sanitary sewer and utility easement (Thomas Lake and Diffley Road) was received and a public hearing scheduled for January 2. PUBLIC HEARINGS The public hearing was closed and approval given to the vacation of the westerly right-of-way of Lexington Way. The public hearing was closed and approval given to the vacation of excess public right-of-way for that portion of T.H. 13. The public hearing was closed and approval given to the vacation of a portion of Cedarvale Boulevard subject to receipt of clear title opinion from applicant's attorney. 27. The public hearing was closed and Project 574 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park-Streetliglits) was approved as modified. 28. The public hearing was closed and Project 583 (Park Center Addition -Streets & Utilities) was continued until the December 19, 1989 meeting. 29. The public hearing was closed and Project 578 (Sibley Terminal Industrial Park -Storm Sewer) was approved. 30. The public hearing was closed and authorization given to property tax levy certification to Dakota County for collectible 1990. Also, the proposed 1990 General Fund Budget was continued to the December 19 meeting for final ratification. 31 W, 33 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS The 1989 and 1990 installments of special assessments on HUD purchased property, including interest and penalties due to Dakota County was approved, and authorization was given to the prepayment of the total outstanding assessment balances from the Park Site Acquisition Development Fund. The 1990 fee schedule was approved. The proposed amendments to the Solid Waste Ordinance were approved. 34. A variance request by Tim and Connie White for a side yard setback to accommodate an expansion of a closet and bathroom in the master bedroom of their existing single-family home at Lot 5, Block 2, Oak Chase 3rd Addition was approved. 35 �� 37 An extension on the preliminary plat for Ss. Martha and Mary Episcopal Church until November 30, 1990 was approved. An off -sale liquor license for Cheers Wine and Spirits to be located at the Rahncliff Crossings was continued indefinitely. Action was taken to defer off -sale liquor license applications until a workshop in January. A conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor at Xavier's Restaurant was continued until the February 6, 1,990 City Council meeting. A conditional use permit to allow outside storage in an L-1 district requested by A & R Pallet Crating was approved. 40. A planned development amendment for Rahncliff Crossings, Inc. to revise the overall pylon sign exhibit was approved. 41. A formal reimbursement in the amount of $1,470 as dedication credit for parkland that was previously dedicated to the City as a part of the Blackhawk Park PUD to Horne Development Corporation was approved. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA 42. A special City Council workshop session was set for December 12 at 6:30 p.m. 43. Change Order #1 to Contract 89718 (Lexington Way-.Street Improvement) was approved. 44. The scheduled public hearing of December 19 for Project 461 (Yankee Doodle Road-O'Neil Property) was cancelled and rescheduled for January 2 for Parcels 010-56 and 010-77 in the south half of Section 10. 45. At the City Attorney's request, an executive session was held immediately following the .City Council meeting to discuss privileged information regarding the Bieter vs. City of Eagan lawsuit. 46. All bills were approved and ordered paid. WINTER RECREATION LEADERS FOR 1989-1990 Returnlne StafT: New StatT: Brad Czubernat Sara Berkebile Kevin Duffy Barry Billmeyer Mike Geere Pat Boquist Tim Gill Troy Christopherson Andy Halvorsen Jami Lee Cullen Cory Lynch, Rob De Rosier Tim McElligott Chris Fitch Tom McNurlin Tyrone Johnson Jeff Olson Shane Johnson Brent Tait Shannon Kerry John Tracy Roger Ketterline Tom Wise Kent Knutson Brandon Kusnier Steven Lakler Catherine Liberty Daniel McNamara Ray Sperl Pete Walters David Wang Theresa Bland Aaron Godleski Wayne Leseman w AIEN10 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEmBER 4, 1989 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL.INFORMATION FOR DECEMBER 5, 1989 CITY COUNCIL MEETING DEPARTMENT HEAD BUSINESS A. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. I -NET Services to Fire Stations #4 and #5 --Enclosed and referenced as page 1A is a letter of response from Cable TV North Central regarding the City's request to eliminate any cost for the I -NET services to Fire Stations #4 and #5. CONSENT A. Personnel Items Item 5. Winter Recreation Leaders --The following additional persons are recommended for hire as Winter Recreation Leaders by Recreation Supervisor Oyanagi: Theresa Bland Aaron Godleski Wayne Leseman F. Lawful Gambling License --The Police Department has concluded their review of the lawful gambling license exemption/Transportation Club of St. Paul application and find no reason to deny the application. PUBLIC HEARINGS G. Proposed Property Tax Levy Certification/1990 General Fund --Enclosed is a handout for any residents who are present at the public hearing to learn more about the proposed property tax levy certification and 1990 general fund budget. This information is referenced as pages 103A through 103E. NEW BUSINESS G. Conditional Use Permit for Xavier's Restaurant to Allow On -Sale Liquor in a CSC District --The APC minutes for this item are enclosed on pages 158A and 158B. H: Conditional Use Permit, A & R Pallet Crating to Allow Outside Storage in an IA District--The APC minutes for this item are enclosed on pages 163A and 163B. I. Planned Development Amendment for Rahnclift Crossings, Inc., to Revise the Overall Pylon Sign Exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development --The APC minutes for this item are enclosed on page 167A. INFORMATIVE There are three additional informative items: TRI•LAND PARTNERSHIP/ICE ARENA PROJECT UPDATE The Economic Development Commission heard a presentation by Tri -Land Partnership and gave consideration to the tax increment financing application that Tri -Land is requesting for their ice arena project. Since Tri -Land Partnership •made application for TIF, they have hired Publicorp„ Inc. to work on the application and it was learned at the EDC meeting that the application is intended as a land write-down which is different than the original application. The City Administrator has drafted a letter, see the attached copy on pages through A(o that requests some specific information so that the EDC and possibly Finance Committee of the City Council can further review the application. ANNUAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE CHRISTMAS LUNCHEON. The annual Dakota County Chamber of Commerce Christmas Luncheon which includes the Person of the Year presentation is scheduled for Wednesday, December 13 at the Mendakota Country Club. Again, the Chamber is requesting that each person attending the luncheon bring a toy that will be donated to the Community Action Council for either the Robert B. Lewis House or Armful of Love. Please let the City Administrator know at the City Council meeting whether you will be planning to attend so that we can make the necessary reservations. M`NVCC RESPONSE TO PAYMENT OF $5.000 TO EACH RESIDENT The City has received a response from the Metropolitan Waste Control. Commission regarding Council action at the October 3 meeting requesting that the commission pay $5,000 to each resident of the Wuthering Heights neighborhood in addition to a requirement that the MWCC make certain utility connections for the neighborhood. Attached and referenced as page W is •a copy of the letter. /s/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator Z0'"d' ld'101 E1 001 6661r'/0E/11 1t7ZlIN .... ....... ... ........ Abrdi Central November 28, 1969 Mike Reardon Burnevllie/Eagan Cable Commission 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55121 934 Woodhill _Drive Roseville, MN 55113 612493-9999 Dear Mike; In response to your letter of November 20, 1989, I will provide to you, In writang, the *actions of the ordinance that we have previously discussed on the phone. As a matter of background, Group W and the Commission, established an Initial service area. As additional homes were built, the density of 40 homes per mile must be reached in order for the Company to extend cable plant to those homes. If one sees•that this was, established as It was b , not cost affective to extend plant when virtually no subscribers existed. Caraln government facilities, which existed at that time, were specifically mentioned In the proposal and cable plant was: extended to them at that time. The franchise envisioned that the area would grow and that now residential spring as well as the community llsthoae reedents.The franchise covered extension of plant to these services facilities se follows' Article III, Section 7 - listed the Institutions and further stated "and such other public Institutions within 200 feet of existing Institutional network as the city may from time to time designate in substitution thereof or In addition :thereto ° The language in the Burnsville and Eagan Ordinance are the same. I hope that this clarifies the situation for you. Both of these ffrestations were built atter the franchise was awarded and were built away from both existing subscriber and Institutional network plant locatlone. Obviously, had they been within 200 feet, we would not have mentioned a charge at all, Please let me know If I can be of •further assistance. Sincerely, Kathl Donnelly -Cohen Director of Public Affaire 3.7% 220%. 17.3% 57.0% INDEPENDENT SCHOOL. DISTRICT 196 OTHER TAXING JURISDICTIONS DAKOTA COUNTY CITY OF EAGAN SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED 1990 TAX ( City Estimate ) 3.9% 2&1% 21A% 46.6% The 1989 special legislative,, session withdrew state aid from titles and gave It to school districts. This shift will require titles to raise their tax levy to compensate for this loss. By law,,school districts are required to lower their tax levy by the. same amount of state ald'they received from the cities. There Is no net change In property taxes as a result of this state aid'. redistribution. However, each tazingijurlsdiction may still adjust their specific levy'amount. r COMPARISON OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES FOR MY SERVICES: 1989 AND 1990 GENERAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SAFETY PUBLIC WORKS PARKS & RECREATION CONTINGENCY TOTAL General GovemmerA • Mayor,Council • Administration • Data Processing • Finance/City Clerk e Legal • Community Development • Cable'TV Public Safety e Police e Fire Park & Recreation a Parks,& Recreation • Forestry Public Works • Public Works/Engineering • Streets& Highways s Central Services/ Maintenance 1989 53,122;910( 28.7%) $3,138,640 ( 29.1%) 3,807,820 ( 96.3%) 4,078,110'( 37.9%) 1,998,010 ( 19.0%) 1;941,610 ( 18.0%) 1,452,960'( 13.9%) 1,568,560 ( 14.6%) 114;080 (01.1%). 40,210 ( 00.4%) $10,495;780 (100:0%) $10,767,130 (100.0%) PROPOSED 1990 ausvx[aur id[u:en mrtiMmcr co.s� . naic svEr* car: act a General Fund Budget Proposed Increase Is 2.6% or $271,350. • The Metropolitan Council shows a population Increase of 3.5% from 1988 to 1989, the estimated 1989 population used Is 44;058. s The consumer price Index for Minneapolis/St.'PaulIncreased by 4.0%•for thefirst half of 1989 over the first half of 1988. a The proposed budget Is attempting to maintain a constant level of services, not to expand programs and/or services. a General Fund personnel Increase for, 1990 Include one police officer and a ten hour Increase to one clerical position. s The City's 1990 payable tax base Is, expected to grow by approximately 14.1% from the payable 1989 base. • Personnel costs constitute 70.5% of the General Fund Budget as local government services are labor Intensive. r 26A% 619% 119% 1989 TAX 14.7% 022% 04.9% GENERAL FUND SOURCES OF REVENUE FOR CITY OF EAGAN FEES, PERMM LICENSES, CNARGES„ETC. PROPERTYTAXES STATE AID TOTAL TAX LEVY GENERAL FUND DEBT SERVICE EOUIPMENT REVOLVING MAJOR STREET lP3 Q - PROPOSED 1980 PROPOSED 1990 25A% 727% 01.9% 60A% 12.3% 02.6% 04.5% RUDEXP GENERAL FUND COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF EXPENDITURES Actual Actual Budget -Dept Request Admn Request 10-10-89 ____________ 1987 1988 ____________ 1989 ____________ 1990 ____________ 1990 ____________ 1990 ___________ GENERAL GOVERNMENT - O1 Mayor & Council S 71,522 E 54;586 E '57,100 $ 71,010 S 71.,010 $ 71,010 02 Administration 336,387 354,066 415;630 701,160 424,205 424,210 03 Data Processing. 131,799 190,473 346,250 403,890 268,760 268;760 05 Finance/Ci;ty Clark 508,258 ,557„782 622;680 687,710 680,210 680,210 06 Legal 21,7,185 306,031 260•,000 -440,000 390,000, 390,000 07 Community Development 761,063 1,101,152 1,281,420 1,454„190 1,269,260 1,255,.110 10 Cable TV 38,488 148,660 139,830 49,340 49,340 ____________ 49,340 ------------ ............ $ ____________ 2,064,702 ............ E 2,712,750 ____________ ____________ $ 3,122,910 ____________ ____________ $ 3,807;300' ____________ E. 3,152,785 ____________ S 3,138,640 ____________ PUBLIC SAFETY 1.1 Police 8 2,198,808 E 2,628;868 S 3,093',920 $ 3,567,790 8.3,544,650 $ 3,369,870 12 Fire 507,170 478,699 713,900 770,592 725,350 708,240 S 2,705,978 A 8,107,567 S 3,807;820 S 4,338,382 E 4,270,000 $ 4,078,110 PUBLIC WORKS' ------------ ... ............ ............ ............ ------------ -----_.__... 21 Public Works Engineering S 561,954 $ 632,458 8 646,200 $ 727,.100 S 712,400 $ 677,900 ,22 Streets & Highways 1.,255,312 964,995 1,027;450 1,,128,490 893,670 946,670 24 Central Services Maintenance _ 250,583. 324,360 401,080 317,040 317,040 $ 1,817.,266 E 1,848,036 $ 1,998,010 $ 2,256,670 $ 1,923,1.10 $ 1,941,610 ____________ PARKS& RECREATION ------------ ____________ ____________ ____________ ____________ 31 Parks & Recreation S 1,,082,054 S 1,290,368 $ 1,362,760 E 1,648,900 $ 1,518,310 8 1,470,810 32 Forestry ____________ 65,747 70,155 ____________ 90,200 ____________ 164,530 ____________ 97„750 ____________ 97,.750 ------------ S 1,147„801 S 1,360,523 8 .1,452,960 $ 1,813,430 S 1,616,060 $ 1,568,560 OTHER ............. ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 41 Contingency ____________ - - ____________ S 114,080 ____________ S 0 ____________ E' '0 ____________ E 40,210 ____________ E ............ - S - ............ 8 114,080 ............ $ 0 ............ $ 0 ............ E 40,210 ............ TOTAL GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES S 7,735,747 S 9,028,876 $10,495.,780 $12,215,782 $10,961,955 $10,767,130 1 906WCSR TOTAL GENERAL FUND 7,946,875 8,767,274 10,495„780 828,570 10,768,220 10,767,130 ------------------------------------------ CITY OF EAGAN GENERAL 'FUND: COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES 10-10-89 1987 1988 1989 4-30-89 1990 1990 REVISED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET Y.T.D. ESTIMATE ESTIMATE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ TA%ES 3,931.,622 4,456,200 5,700,050 195,960 6,484,240 7,824,060 LICENSES 66,752 62,846 74,770 14,187 78,140 78,140 PERMITS 988,144 964,991 926,630 229,388 816,700 816,700 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1„350,075 1,367,149 .2,023,570 0 1,544,330 204;530 CHARGES FOR SERVICES- 520,829 588;667 565,480 131„095 606,150 606,150 RECREATION CHARGES 80;560 116,407 80,600 70;172- 112,950 146,840 ,FINES AND. FORFEITS- 134;445 177,468, 150,000. 49,201 190,000 190,000 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUES 225,581 203,019 153,000 10,599 131,600 131,600 PROGRAM REVENUES 609,507 788,557 766,.180 127,968 754,110 719,110 TRANSFERS 39,360 41,970 55;500 0 50,000 50;000 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 7,946,875 8,767,274 10,495„780 828,570 10,768,220 10,767,130 ------------------------------------------ MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA NOVEMBER 28, 1989 A regular meeting of the Eagan Advisory Planning Commission was held on Tuesday, November 28, 1989, at 7:00 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Chairman Pawlenty, Members Voracek, Graves, Trygg, Merkley, Gorman and Hoeft. Also present were Assistant City Engineer Mike Foertsch, City Planner Jim Sturm and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. AGENDA Chairman Pawlenty informed the Commission that the applicants requested a continuance of Item I (Diffley/Cedar Planned Development - Koldt Properties) and Item F (Eagan Center 5th Addition - Tri -Land Partnership). Graves moved; Voracek seconded, the motion to approve the agenda as amended. All voted in favor. MINUTES October 24, 1989. Voracek moved, Merkley seconded, the motion to approve the October 24,, 1989 Advisory Planning Commission minutes as presented. Pawlenty, Voracek, Graves, Trygg., Merkley and Hoeft voted in favor; Gorman abstained. XAVIER'S RESTAURANT - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Pawlenty opened the first public hearing for the evening regarding a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor in a Community Shopping Center district located on Lot 3, Block 1, Town Centre 100 6th Addition along Town Centre Drive in the Northwest Quarter of Section 15. City Planner Jim Sturm introduced the matter to the Commission. The manager of Xavier's Restaurant was present .at the meeting for questions,. Trygg moved, Hoeft seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow on -sale liquor in a Community Shopping Center district located on Lot 3, Block 1, Town. Centre 100 6th Addition along Town Centre Drive in the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, as requested by Xavier's Restaurant, subject to the following conditions: All applicable ordinances. EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 28, 1989 Page 2 2. Any necessary permits are approved by the City Police Department. All voted in favor. A & R PALLET CRATING'- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow outside storage in a Light Industrial district located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located east of Highway 3 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36. City Planner Jim Sturm summarized the application for the Commission. Art Mulvihill informed the Commission he had no objections to planting the requested trees. He gave a history of the property. He reported that the company was currently piling the pallets 14 feet high. He explained the manufacturing process. Commissionmember Graves questioned the stacking height limitation. He felt the whole area should be reviewed. He asked why the applicant was requesting a permit when the pallets were presently located on the property. Commissionmember Merkley asked if further trailers would be provided. Mr. Mulvihill replied he was unsure. Commissionmember Merkley stated the number of trailers should be limited. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the meaning of the word,"materials" in proposed condition number 2. Mr.. Mulvihill explained that "materials" referred to lumber. He reported that he did not want the number of trailers, limited and pointed out that he currently owns 18 trailers. Commissionmember Merkley had concerns regarding the leasing of trailers. Commissionmember Graves commented that he would rather have trailers than pallets. Commissionmember Voracek reported that the property has a permit to run a truck terminal and that trailers are allowed to be.parked on the property. Commissionmember Trygg questioned the 10 foot limitation in proposed condition number 2. City Planner Jim Sturm explained that the 10 foot limitation would reduce the impact to other properties. Commissionmember Gorman had concerns that the stacking of pallets could be a possible fire hazard. Mr. Mulvihill felt it was not a concern. Commissionmember Merkley stated that the terminal permit was not needed' and asked if it could be revoked as,a condition. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained that the permit could be voluntarily revoked =IV EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November 28, 1989 Page 2 2. Any necessary permits are approved by the Department. All voted in favor. A & R PALLET CRATING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT City Police Chairman Pawlenty convened the public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow outside storage in a Light Industrial district located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located east of Highway 3 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 36. City Planner Commission. Art Mulvihill planting the req reported that th high. He explained Jim Sturm summarized the application for the informed the Commission he had no objections to nested trees. He gave a history of the property. He e company was currently piling the pallets 14 feet the manufacturing process. Commissionmember Graves questioned the stacking height limitation. He felt the whole area should be reviewed. He asked why the applicant was requesting a permit when the pallets were presently located on the property. Commissionmember Merkley asked if further trailers would be provided. Mr. Mulvihill replied he was unsure. Commissionmember Merkley stated the number of trailers should be limited. Chairman Pawlenty questioned the meaning of the word "materials" in proposed condition number 2. Mr. Mulvihill explained that "materials" referred to lumber. He reported that he did not want the number of trailers limited and pointed out that he currently owns 18 trailers. Commissionmember Merkley had concerns regarding the leasing of trailers. Commissionmember Graves commented that he would rather have trailers than pallets. Commissionmember Voracek reported that the property has a permit to run a truck terminal and that trailers are allowed to be parked on the property. Commissionmember Trygg questioned the 10 foot limitation in proposed condition number 2. City Planner Jim Sturm explained that the 10 foot limitation would reduce the impact to other properties. Commissionmember Gorman had concerns that the stacking of pallets could be a possible fire hazard. Mr. Mulvihill felt it was not a concern. Commissionmember Merkley stated that the terminal permit was not needed and asked if it could be revoked as a condition. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained that the permit could be voluntarily revoked 1C .3A EAGAN,ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES' November 28,, 1989 Page 3 as a condition. Chairman Pawlenty had questions regarding interim use. City Attorney Mike Dougherty explained the required procedure. Graves moved, Voracek seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a conditional use permit to allow outside storage in a Light Industrial district located on Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Halley's 1st Addition located east of Highway 3 in the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, as requested by A & R Pallet -Crating,, subject to the following conditions: 1. All outside storage areas and non -paved areas shall be sodded or seeded to control dust and run-off. 2. Outside storage of pallets and materials shall not exceed ten (10) feet in height. 3. The applicant shall plant staggered growth of evergreens May 31, 1990. All voted in favor. and maintain a triple row of along the north property line by RAHNCLIFF 2ND ADDITION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Chairman Pawlenty convened the next public hearing regarding a conditional use permit to allow a drive-thru facility on Lot 3, Block 3, Rahncliff 2nd Addition located south of Cliff Road and west of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32 - City Planner Jim Sturm explained the application to 'the Commission. Mark Smith (Rahncliff) reported that they would make the traffic flow one way. He pointed out that all requirements had been met and that the employee parking was in the rear of the building. Commissionmember Graves had questions regarding the traffic flow. Mr. Smith stated that the flow would be the same. Commissionmember Graves felt that the City would be inviting a difficult situation. Commissionmember Hoeft asked if a menu would be displayed outside. Mr. Smith showed the proposed location of the menu. Commissionmember Hoeft remarked that the stacking of cars was also a concern. Commissionmember Voracek also had questions regarding the car stacking. He felt that a one-way would also cause traffic flow 'problems and parking problems. Commissionmember Gorman asked if the stacking would block the parking. Mr. Smith replied that the parking would not be blocked and explained the distances. He reported' that the Dairy Queen building could be moved down approximately 20 feet. Mr. Smith requested a continuance to re-examine the matter. There was further discussion regarding the traffic flow. EAGAN ADVISORY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES November, 28, 1989 Page 4 Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and continue to the December, 21, 1989 Advisory Planning Commission the conditional use permit to allow a drive-thru facility on Lot 3, Block 3, Rahncliff 2nd Addition located south of Cliff Road and West of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, as requested by Mark Austin Smith. All voted in favor. RAHNCLIFF CROSSINGS, INC. - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT Chairman Pawlenty opened the next public hearing for the evening regarding a planned development amendment to revise the overall pylon sign exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development located south of Cliff Road and west of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32. City Planner Jim Sturm updated the Commission on the background of the matter. He recommended two conditions as follows.: (1) the pylon sign shall be 10 feet within the property line and (2) the applicant to submit a plan for the pylon sign to the City for approval. Mark Smith (Rahncliff) explained the history. Chairman Pawlenty asked if the relocation of the sign was at the City's request. Mr. Smith explained it was by mutual agreement. Commissionmember Merkley stated he felt the relocation of the sign would be an improvement as the signs were too close together. Voracek moved, Graves seconded, the motion to close the public hearing and approve a planned development amendment to revise the overall pylon sign exhibit in the Rahncliff Crossings Planned Development located south of Cliff Road and west of Highway 35E in the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, as requested by Rahncliff Crossings, Inc., subject to the following conditions: 1,. The pylon sign shall be 10 feet within the property line. 2. The applicant shall submit a plan for the pylon sign to the City for approval. 3. The Rahncliff Plaza sign to be removed. All voted in favor. of 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD VIC ELLISON EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55122-1897 Mwor PHONE: (612),454-8100 THOMAS EGAN FAX: (612):454-8363 DAVID K. GUSTAFSON PAMELA McCREA THEODORE WACHTER Council Members THOMAS HEDGES December 4, 1989 Ory Admlnl:emor EUGENE VAN OVERBEKE CIN Ciera BRAD SWENSON TRI -LAND PARTNERSHIP OF EAGAN 1260 YANKEE DOODLE RD, #202 EAGAN NN 55121 Re:Tax Increment Financing Application for Proposed Ice Arena Project Dear Brad: The City would like to notify you of the results of the Economic Development Commission's initial meeting held on Tuesday, November 28 and its intentions as to proceeding with the analysis of this project. The Commission was generally favorable in its reception of an ice arena being constructed privately as a part of a commercial venture, however, would like additional information prior to any final recommendation to the City Council. This information would permit the City staff and the Commission to fully evaluate the potential of the project for the City. On behalf of the Commission I am requesting that you provide the City with an updated application with more information on the private development and less on the operational aspects of the ice arena. Specifically, the City would like definitive responses to the following points: 1. Provide a legal description of the boundaries of the proposed tax increment financing district complete with a listing of parcel identification numbers for all parcels located within the district. Define the nature of the development to occur on each parcel within the proposed tax increment financing district. This parcel description should include the following:, A. Nature of business; B. Size of proposed development (this should include a square footage and estimated market value of the proposed development.) If possible the information should be sufficient to permit the County Assessor to determine market value; C. Date of construction start up; THE LONE OAK TREE ... THE SYMBOLGTH AND GROWTH IN OUR COMMUNITY Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer BRAD SWENSON DECEMBER 4, 1989 PAGE TWO D. Date of construction completion. 3. Information on original valuation of the district. A. For each parcel in the district we would like the following valuation information as of January 2, 1989 and January 2, 1985; 1) Assessors estimated market value, tax capacity and property classification (if possible we would like this information provided by the County Assessor in writing.) 4. Description of the compliance of this project with the 25% use restriction for economic development districts in the metropolitan area. This specific compliance requirement should be on a parcel specific basis; 5. Describe the specific nature of the tax increment financing. assistance requested; 6. Describe the ownership of the ice arena, i.e., private or public; 7. Describe the requested method of tax increment financial assistance, i.e., bond issuance or pay as you go; 8. Define the developers position on the fiscal disparities option; 9. Specifically detail the contractual language whereby the City will be held harmless for any future financial participation either for debt service or operational deficiencies with a declaration of guarantees for default under the contract. The Economic Development Commission is requesting this information be provided where appropriate on the City's application form and where not appropriate on supplemental appendix chapters to the application. As soon as the City receives this information it will perform its own analysis of the tax increment financing potential and application to the situation. The City is unclear on the developer's intention as to the status of the bank/medical office building. It would be helpful if this clarification is added to clarify the status of the facility and its relationship to the proposed TIF district. The City is interested in promptly moving ahead with this project in an efficient, reasonable manner. Because of the changes initiated by the developer's representatives at the Commission meeting, it is not feasible to follow the current schedule for the BRAD SWENSON DECEMBER 5, 1989 PAGE THREE TIF public hearing to be held mid-January. This schedule would require the completion of the TIF plan within the next two weeks. The City is of the opinion that from both developer's and the City's perspectives this time table would not permit a responsible evaluation of the project. The City would like to initiate a new calendar. This calendar would begin with the submission of the amended application to the City no later than December 12. The Economic Development Commission has scheduled a special meeting for December 19 to review the amended application and the analysis of the City staff and consultants. After that meeting a complete calendar can be determined. Based on the developer's statements as to the construction schedule, this new calendar should still ensure completion of the TIF process well in advance of any actual construction. I would assume that you will ask Publicorp to compile much of this information given their expertise and experience with working with tax increment financing applications. If any of your consultants or yourself have questions regarding this request on the process, please contact the Director of Finance, Gene VanOverbeke, the City's fiscal consultant, Dave MacGillivray, or this office at any time so the City can continue to move ahead with its analysis of the project. Sincerely, Thomas U� Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator cc: Members of the Economic Development Commission Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Finance Dale Runkle, Director of Community Development Dave MacGillivray, City's Fiscal Consultant/Springsted Jim Sheldon, City Attorney Steve Rosholt, City's Bond Counsel, Faegre and Benson TLH/jeh Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Mears Park Centre, 230 East Fifth Street, St, Paul, Minnesota 55101 November 22, 1989 612222-8423 Mr. Thomas L. Hedges rypV City Administrator ray. City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Re: Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant Expansion and Upgrade Dear Mr. Hedges: The MWCC is in receipt of your letter of October 17, 1989 informing us of the Eagan City Council's recommendation of October 3, 1989. The MWCC has committed $48 million to the Seneca Plant expansion and upgrade, the primary purpose of which is to meet increasing demands for sewer service by the communities served by the plant including Eagan. The upgrade is intended to benefit all of the citizens of Eagan and adjacent communities by solving odor problems at the plant and meeting stricter air and water quality standards. Over the last year and a half the MWCC has made every effort to accommodate the Eagan City Council's conditions for expansion and upgrade of the plant. We intend to continue our full compliance with the Development Agreement, Development Contract and Escrow Agreement. As you well know, however, a public agency is not authorized to make payments to residents in the vicinity of public works projects for stress or hardship during construction or operation of the public facility. The Commission's Engineering and Construction staff always tries to work as closely as possible with residents near our projects to alleviate disruption during construction. We will certainly do so with the residents of the Wuthering Heights neighborhood during the plant expansion. However, the Commission cannot agree to the City Council's recommendation to pay $5,000 to each resident of the Wuthering Heights neighborhood. Sincerely, Helen Boyer v Deputy Chief Administrator HAB:JKM:cac L-HAB14 cc: Lurline Baker -Kent Ed DeLaForest Douglas Warner Pauline Langsdorf Commissioners Margaret Shreiner/Metropolitan Council Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer \C\:A _010PT SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING TUESDAY DECEMBER 12, 1989 6:30 P.M. I. ROLL CALL AND ADOPTION OY AGENDA H. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY 0 III. PROPOSED 1990 PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND IV. PROPOSED 1990 GENERAL FUND BUDGET V. OTHER BUSINESS VI. EXECUTIVE SESSION/LABOR NEGOTIATIONS VII. ADJOURNMENT MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1989 SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING At the December 5 regular City Council meeting, a special City Council meeting was set for Tuesday, December 12 at 6:30 p.m. to discuss the Multi -Family Residential Land Study and finalize the 1990 Operating Budget for both Public Enterprise and General Fund expenditures. In addition, the City Council will adjourn, in executive session to provide direction regarding labor negotiations and provide direction regarding health insurance and personnel increases for 1990. MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LAND STUDY At the City Council meeting this past Tuesday, December 5, an updated report entitled "Multi -Family Residential Land Study" was distributed to each member of the City Council for your review. This report summarizes certain study areas thatwere directed by the City Council for additional review. Those areas identified in the special study were areas c, n, v and w. The Director of Community Development is planning to review each of .the study areas and following the special City Council meeting on Tuesday, meetings with the owners of the parcels, identified on page 9 will be scheduled. John Voss of Urban Planning and Design will' assist Community Development with that process. If any member of the City Council has misplaced the updated report or the original report, please feel free to contact this office and a copy will be sent out to you. PROPOSED 1990 PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND The Public Enterprise Fund, which includes the water and sanitary sewer utilities and streetlighting, has been completed and is ready for City Council consideration. For a copy of the Public Enterprise Fund Bud et, refer to a memo and the budget worksheets enclosed and referenced as pages through gIZ 1990 GENERAL. FUND BUDGET The City Administrator and Director of Parks and Recreation are planning to present data for increasing user fees for recreational programs and information pertaining to the total operating cost of various park services. The City Administrator will also review the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund, so a determination could be made as to how much equipment should be purchased during 1990. The City Administrator will have input regarding what equipment, if any, could be further maintained and not replaced during 1990 and further, if any equipment can be delayed for future acquisition. Enclosed as pages � through is a reprint of the Capital Equipment Revolving Fund information that appeared in the October 6, 1989 budget memo. OTHER .BUSINESS There is no additional business anticipated at this time. EXECUTIVE SESSION Action would be in order to approve an executive session for the purpose of discussing wages and benefits pertaining to collective and non-collective.bargaining groups. Following the adjournment of the special City Council meeting, the Council can retreat to the City Administrator's office. Items to be discussed in executive session include a response to both Police Association and clerical ,unit regarding their most recent counter -proposals. Also, the City Administrator would like direction on a wage increase, health insurance and the use of a flexible spending plan for all employee groups. There will be handouts available at the meeting on Tuesday for each of these items. /S/ Thomas L. Hedges City Administrator R MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: DECEMBER 8, 1989 SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1990 PUBLIC The following is the proposed consisting of both expenditures and streetlighting enterprise addressed separately beginning WATER ENTERPRISE FUND FUND BUDGET 1990 public enterprisefundbudget and revenues for the water, sewer funds. Each utility fund is with the water utility. The Director of Public Works is proposing a full-time maintenance employee in the Water Department to assist with the increase in infrastructure, deep wells, new reservoirs and other utility system responsibilities,. The amounts budgeted for Parts and Supplies are consistent as proposed for 1990 with budget 1989 with two (2) exceptions., Those exceptions are chemicals and chemical products, an increase of $41,000 to $5.0,000. The chemicals and chemical products include KMN04, fluoride and chlorine to treat approximately 3,,000,000,000 gallons of water. The other expense is "in the amount of $22,500, an increase from $7,000 in 1989 to provide landscaping for .two (2) additional well houses and sod repair damaged property. The category "Services and Other Charges" includes a number of operating expenses including, audit services, telephone service, gopher one call service and several 'other general operating expenses. The major expense in this category is for electricity to operate the wells and booster stations. Due to the increase in those facilities, the budget is proposed, at $357,000, a change from the 1989 appropriation of $299,000. The water main repairs also increased to include a contingency for water main repairs and the inspection of Wells 42 and #6y which is estimated at $3.0,000 of the total $52,00'0 proposed expenditure. Also included is the City's principal and interest payment for the water treatment plant. There are several considerations under Capital Outlay and several are paid 50% by water revenues and 50% sewer revenues Those items that show a total cost figure with an asterisk represent 501 of the total cost with the remainder being paid for by the sewer utility. The Capital items are listed as follows: Acquisition of Blue Cross, land $ 62,500* Fencing of land acquisition 10,000* Parking lot and aisle improvements 7,500* Garage expansion debt 39,500 Office expansion remodeling 105,000 (This represents 25% of the total Public Works garage remodeling) Gas detector 1,500 Utility locators 750* Air knife 1,800 One-half ton pick-up truck radio & equipment 1,400 3/4 ton PU truck utility, body, radio-& equipment 17,500 *Those amountsfollowed with an asterisk indicate 50% of the total cost for the referenced capital item. The remaining 50% will be funded through the sewer utility. Also included in the Water Department is an appropriation for a transfer to the General. Fund to offset certain personnel costs in Public Works Engineering as well as other expenses paid for by the General Fund. SEWER UTILITY There are two (2) personnel considerations for the Sewer Utility Department. Thereasons are similar to the water utility operation. The Director of Public Works is asking that consideration be given to the addition of a full-time employee in the Sewer Department to further assist in the sanitary and storm sewer maintenance program, provide assistance with the expanded sewer maintenance, operations, ongoing hydrant and gate valve maintenance and other maintenance requirements. There is also a request in the budget to expand the temporary/seasonal personnel from six (6) to seven (7) to assist with both the sanitary and storm sewer maintenance program. Parts and, Supplies for the sewer utility show little increase from 1989. Most of these accounts are for cleaning supplies,, clothing and personal equipment, ,small repairs,, building repairs, motor fuels, tires.,landscape material with the highest cost being for utility system.parts and supplies at $8,000,. Included in Services and Other Charges are a broad number of expenses, including electricity for the lift station, utility system repair in the amount of $19,500, public utility administration in the amount of $91,000 and each year the MWCC disposal charge continues to increase and is proposed at $2,254,000 for 1990. This is an increase from.$Q,902,000 in 1989. The Capital Outlay for the sewer utility includes the following,: Acquisition of 5 acres from Blue Cross $ 62,500* Fencing of land acquisition 10,000* Parking lot and aisle improvements 7,500* Office expansion remodeling 105,000 (represents 25% of total remodeling cost) Garage expansion debt 39,500 Rubber suction hose 1,500 Discharge hose Gas detector Utility locators 5/8 ton PU truck 1,800 1,500 750* 12,000 *Those amounts followed with an asterisk indicate 50% of the total cost for the referenced capital item. The remaining 50% will be funded through the sewer utility. In summary, the Sewer Utility reflects very few changes in proposed operations. With the additional emphasis on controlling the environment by better managing maintenance of storm water holding ponds along with expanding sanitary sewer services, additional personnel is requested. Items proposed under Capital have been discussed by the City Council in earlier budget considerations, such as land acquisition from Blue Cross, the expansion of the administrative offices of the Public Works garage facility and other related improvements. STREETLIGHTING UTILITY The expenditure proposed for streetlighting is increasing each year proportionate to the number of new streetlights that are installed and billed to benefitting'property owners. The rates are set at a level which. is expected to cover the energy cost and they are reviewed on a regular basis. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED PUBLIC ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGET The Public Enterprise Fund Budget consisting of. water, sewer and streetlighting utilities is a revenue -based budget with no reliance on property tax. The proposed budget reflects present operations, taking into consideration the growth of our public. utility system. With additional personnel in the sewer division, there is an emphasis in proper maintenance of the storm water system. The total proposed budget for the water utility is $2,39,2,846,, the sewer utility is $2,908,028,, and streetlighting is $67,060 as proposed for 1990. Therefore, the total Public Enterprise Fund operating Budget presented for 1990 is $5,367,.874„ an increase of $636,434 over the 1989 budget of $4,731,440. C116 40 k_Ls City Admin rator TLE/vmd PUBLIC UTILITIES - COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES OPERATING REVENUES: 61 WATER Service Charges. Connection Permits Penalties Sale of Materials 6 Meter Charges Other TOTAL 62 SEWER Service Charges Connection Permits Penalties Other TOTAL 63 STREETLIGHTING Service Charges TOTAL TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 1987 1988 1989 1990 ----------------------------------------------------- $1,767,715 $2,107,459 $1,900,,000 $2,020,000 $9,580 $8,375 $14,300 $6,500 $17,698 $26,413 $24,000 $24,000 $97,388 $84,723 $165,000 $150,000 $18,053 $23,774 $14,200 $18,200 ----------------------------------------------------- $1,910,434 ----------------------------------------------------- $2,250,744 $2,117,500 $2,218,900 $1,980,176 $9,682 $26,240 $3,871 ------------ $2,01'9,969 -------------- $2,193,,197 $_2,050,000 $2,650,000 $8,950 $14„300 $26,000 $26,,297 $24,000 $24,000 $728 $400 $300 $2„229,172 $2,088,700 $2,682,800 ------------------------------------- $54,673 $61,095 $63,220 $67,000 ----------------- $54,673 ------------------------------ $61,095 $63,;220 $67,000 $3,985,076 $4,541,011 $4:,,269,,420 $4,,968,700 COMPARATIVE SUMMARY OF REVENUES (CONTINUED) ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET 1987 1988 1989 11990 ----------------------------------------------------- NON-OPERATING REVENUES: Special Assessments Interest Interest on Investments Interest on Current Value & Debt Service Credit Connection Charges Connection Charge Water Treatment Plant TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES GRAND TOTAL REVENUES DEDICATED REVENUES - NOT AVAILABLE FOR OPERATIONS ------------------------- Supply & Storage Connection Charges Water Treatment Plant Billing Debt Service Surcharge Connection Charges Water System Renewal and Replacement Sewer System Renewal & Replacement Interest Earnings: Water Treatment Plant Water System Renewal and Replacement Sewer System Renewal and Replacement Supply and Storage Municipal Garage Expansion $11,306 $13,278 $12„900 $40,000 $733,417 $935,529 $680,000 $900,000 $28,321 $26,386 $26,000 $22,000 $660,613 $857,215 $550,000 $377,000 $285,420 ---------------------------------------------------- $284,914 $250,000 $148,200 $1,719,077 $2,117,322 $1,518,900 $1,487,200 $5,704,153 $6,658,333 $5,788,;320 $6„455,900 $660,613 $403„432 $285,420 $857,215 $44'4,200 $284,914 $550,000 $400,000 $250,000 $141,239 $164,001 $160,000 $101,.980 $109,736 $115,000 $235,360 $283,155 $300,000 $71,910 $79,525 $153,089 $90,303 $101,805 $178,512 $95,000 $105,000 $150,000 $377,000 $430,000 $148,200 $150,000 $110,000 $210„000 $100,000 $110,000 $150,000 $79,400 $79,400 $79,400 $79,400 ------------------------------------------ $2,211,968 $2,593,241 $2,204,400 $1,864,600 W 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD PERSONAL SERVICES 4110 Salaries 8 Wages - Regular 140,291 156,299 262,620 41,277 9. 306,976 1 306,976 1 4111 Accrued Leave Time 24,636 27,263 0 7,111 I 0 I 0 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4112 Overtime - Regular 5,784 9,093. 22;670 4,948 1 18,844 1 18,844 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4130 Salaries 8 Wages - Temp 3,325 9,708 8,640 1,120 1 9,360 I 9,360 1 4140 Accrued Retirement Benefits 21,413 24,009 34;570 6,572 1 40,655 1 40,655 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4150 Accrued Insurance Benefits ,28,250 30,474 33,970 8,179 I 51,171 I 51,171 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •••• Total Personal Services 223,699 256,846 362,470 69,207 1 427,006 I 427,006 I PARTS 8 SUPPLIES ________________ 4210 Office Supplies 478 51 300 0 1 300 1. 200 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4211 Office Printed Material/Forms 732 294 550 0 1 550 1 400 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4215 Reference Materials 0 0 100 0 1' 100 f 100 1 4220 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Operating Supplies - General 499 1,978 1,000 155 1 1,200 1 1,200 4 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures.by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECO14MD 4221 Film/A-V Tapes 0 20 0 15 1 0 1 0 1 4222 Medical/Rescue/Safety 0 186 -200 0 1, 400 1 200 4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4223 Bldg Operations/Cleaning Supp 726 443 .400 0 I 400 1 450 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4224 'Clothing:& Personal Equip 1,281 1,345 1,,670 304 1 1,910 1, 1,900 1 - 4230 Repair & Mtn Supplies -General 21,178 1,607 2,000 502 1 2,500 f 2,500 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4231 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile Equipment Repair Parts 4,272 4,115 6,000 132 1 6,000 1 5,500 1, - 4232 Small Equip Repair Parts 0 57 0 0. 1 0 1 0 I 4233 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Building Repair Supplies 222 477 800 0' 1 800 1 800 1 4235 Motor Fuels 5,062 5,10319,000, 1,498 1 9,400 1 8,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4236 Lubri cants and Additives. 2,417 1,273 2,700 .. _ 138 _ I 2;700 1 2,300 1 4237 Tires 1,015 627 800 0 1 800' I 800 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4238 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Communication System Parts 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4239 Equipmt Operation Replcmt Part 0 83 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4240 Small Tools 878 1,014 1,200 723 1 • 1,600 1 1,300 1 4241 Shop Materials 616 44 400 18 1 400 1 400 1 SERVICES 8 OTHER CHARGES ------------------ 4310 90DEPT61 - Enterprise Fund 13,000 0 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4312 Engineering Services 13,042 Detailed. Breakdown. of Expenditures by Account ,10,000 5,583 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 4314 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Auditing Services - 1990 Budget 3,750 0 1 3;950 1 3,950 1 4315 Prof Serv-Financial Non -Audit 0 139 0 0 1 0 1 0 l 1990 1990 0 61 NATER 4,000 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ______ ACTUAL ______ APPROP ______ 03-31-89 _________ REQUEST _______ RECOMMD _______ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4243 Heating Oil/Propane/Fuels 0 33 0 11 1 0 1 0 1 4244 Chemicals 8 Chemical Products 26;591 27,938 41,000 3,082 1 55,000 1 50,000 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------`-------------------- 4250 Landscape Material &Supplies 255 403 7,000 0 1 22,500 1 22,500 1 ----------------------------------------- 4255 Street Repair Supplies ______________________________________________________________________________________ 1;876 1,808 .2,000 0 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 \ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4257 Signs 8 Striping Material 513 589 600 48 1 600 1 600 1 4260 Utility System Parts/Supplies 0 26;069 40,000 12,796 1 34,750 1 34,750 1 ---------------------------------------- '•'• ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 'Total Parts 8 Supplies ______________________________________________________________________________________ 66,611 75,560 117,720 19,422 1 143,910 1 135,900 I SERVICES 8 OTHER CHARGES ------------------ 4310 Prof Services - General 1,940 79 13,000 0 1 2,000 1 2,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4312 Engineering Services 13,042 3,954 ,10,000 5,583 1 10,000 1 10,000 1 4314 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Auditing Services 3,300 3,500 3,750 0 1 3;950 1 3,950 1 4315 Prof Serv-Financial Non -Audit 0 139 0 0 1 0 1 0 l ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4323 Testing Services -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 4,001 4,000 880 1 4,000 1 4,000 1 a 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 - 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADNN --------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMO - 4330 ----------------------`-----------•--------------------------------------------------------------------`---------------------- Postage - 4,093 4,817 7,500 1,311 1 7,500 1 7,500 1 4331 ---------------- Telephone Service r--------------------------------- 2,474 403 500 109 1 500 1 :------------------------- 500 1 4332 Telephone Equip Charges -................................................. 0 762 700 0 1 700 1 700 1 ...............................................................................................•------------------------------ 4335 Pager Service Fees 0 158 - 150 55 1 270 I 270 1 .............................................................................................................................. 4336, Telephone Circuit Charges 2,339 2,320 3,000 653 1 3,500 1 3,500 1 \........... 4339 ........................................ One -Call Service Fees _----------- 0 .-------------- 1,758 ----------------`-------------------------------- 0 1,101 110,000 1 10,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4342 Legal Notice Pulication 0 1138 0 161 1 0 1 0 1 .............................................................................................................................. 4350 General Printing 8 Binding 0 '2,017 1,000 0 1 1,000 1 1,000 I 4360 Insurance 29,667 26,440 30,570 3,696 I 34,970 1 34,970 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------...--------- 4371 Electricity 9,989 0 0 0 1 0 1 -0 1 4375 Electricity-Well/Boaster St 246,086 303,598 299,000 33,089 1 357,000 1 357,000 I 4376 Natural Gas Service 26,520 19,472 25,000 7,173 I 27,000 1 27,000 1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------_-....---------------------------------------- 4381 Mobile Equipment Repair 684 834 - 1,000 36 I 1.,000 1 1;000 1 4382 . Small Equipment Repair 90;917 95 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4383 Buildings Repair 10,644 4,952 .2,000 0 1 5,000 1 5,000 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise 'Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN --:----- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03=31-89 REQUEST RECO14ND ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4385 Streets Repair 2,436 6,024 6,000 0 1 6,000 1 6,000 1 -------------------------------- 4386 __________________________________________ Conmun ication System Repair 251 311 __ 660 ___ .. 45 1 600 _ 1 600 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4390 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________----- Utility System Repair 0 54,011 32,000 14,650 1 52,000 1 52,000 1 4397 Machinery & Equipment Rental 1,628 1,370 1,500 0 1 1,500 1 1,500 1 --------------------- ----------------------------=---`--------------.--._..---------------------------------------"....-..--- Q l� 4410 / v Miscellaneous 684 68 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4411 Conferences & Schools 1,586 1,875 2,600 963 1 3,150 1 3,150 1 _____________________________________________-_____-______.-.__---_______--__-_____-__-________________-____--------.-.___---__-___ 4413 Tuition Reimbursement _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 0 251 600 0 1 600 1 600 1 --------------------------------- 4414 Dues & Subscriptions 895 1,064 300 122 I :300 I 300 1 4415 ._ _. Licenses/Permits/Taxes 524 611 800 - - 500 1 - - 800 - - 1 800 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________-_-----_______________-.______________ 4426. 'Interest .484,194 473,569 454;850 0 1 442,100 1 442,100 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________ 4427 Paying Agent Fees 417 '411 0 0 1 0 _ 1 0 1 4440 Pub Util Adim 0 165,200 173;450 43,364 1 182-,000 1 182,000 1 ______________________________________________________________________________....--___-________________-__._.__---.......----_ 4441 Pub Util--Cent Sery Maint 0 50,000 65,400 16,350 I 70,700 1 70,700 1 ----------- 4450 _------------------- _---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other Contractual Service 27 0 0 0 1 0 . 1 0 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of -Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT _ CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ______ ACTUAL ______ APPROP ______ 03-31-89 _________ REQUEST _______ RECOMND ....... 4454 Solid Waste Removal 659 0 200 0 1 200 1 200 1 4459 Courier/Delivery--Service• 0. 296 350 0 I 350 1 350 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4470 Maintenance Contracts 0 '------------------------------------------------------------------ 2,783 1,500 330 L 1,500 1 1,500 1 _-_---`-_-` •... ................................... Total Services 8 Other Chrgs 935,196 1,137,281 1,141,320 130,171 1 1,230,190 1 1,230,190 I w CAPITAL OUTLAY -------------- 4510 Land 8 Land Improvements 0 0 62,500 0 1 80,000 I 80,000 1 4520 Buildings 0 0 84,700 0 1 144,500 1 144,500 1 ----------------------------'_--__-_.--______--__---_--_______--_----__----.-----_--_------___-------------------------------- . 4530 Other Improvements 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 0 4531 Spec Assess on City Property 4;868 4,652 0 0 10 1 0 1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________--..-...--_-__ 4540 Machinery 8 Equipment 0 0 60,000 0 1 0 1 0 1 .............................................................................................................................. 4560. Office Furnishing 8 Equip 0 0 0 0 1 0 1' 0 1 4570 Other Equipment 0. 0 750 584 1, 4,050 f' 4,050 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'---"_-------'_._-..._.__...._ 4580 Mobile. Equipment 0 0 12,000 0 d, 31,500 1 31,500 1 ----------------------------------- .... ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Capital Outlay 4,868 4,652 219,950 5a4. •T 260,050 1 260,050 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget, 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOFIMD ------ ------ ------......... ------- ''----- TRANSFERS 4710 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4610 Project Contract 0 64,889 1 1 0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4613 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Project. -Outside Engineer 0 19,659 1 1 196,700 4616 Project -Legal 0 440 1 1 39,700 1 4618 Project -Other 0 950 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- •••' ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Construction Projec 0 85,938 1 I TRANSFERS 4710 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Transfer Out 196,700 39,700 0 0 1 39,700 1 39,700 1 •••' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Total Transfer 196,700 39,700 0 0 I 39,700 1 39,700 1 OTHER 2310 Bond Payment (Principal-) 0 0 150,000 0 1 150,000 1 150,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4840 Merchandise for Resale 0 0 144,000 38,870 1 1 150,000 1 150,000 1 90DEPT61 Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 61 WATER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN ------=- ACTUAL ------ .ACTUAL ------ APPROP ------ 03-31-89 --------- REQUEST ------- RECOMMD ....... •••• Total Other, 0 0 294,000 38,870 1 300,006 1 300,000 1 TOTAL AMOUNT THIS DIVISION 1,429,074 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1,514,039 2,135,460 344,192 1 2,400,856 1 2,392,846 I 90DEPT62 Enterprise Furl Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget PERSONAL SERVICES ._________________ 4110 Salaries &,Wages - Regular 44,224 73,868' 1990 1990 62 SEWER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T=D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31=89 REQUEST RELOMND PERSONAL SERVICES ._________________ 4110 Salaries &,Wages - Regular 44,224 73,868' 90,560 18,117 I 103,172 1 103,172 1 41.11 Accrued Leave Time 7,954 13,078 0 3,113 1 0 1 0 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4112 Overtime - Regular 1,030 863 5,670 441 I 4,711 I 4,711 I 4130 Salaries 8 Wages - Temp- 4,596 - - 5,993 8,640 -343 - I - 12,500 1 12,500 I (\ 4140 Accrued Retiren�enY�Benef its 6,818 14,087 12,330 2,664 1 14--,6,0,1,-,l 14,601 1 __________________________________________________________________________________-_____________________________________________ 4150 Accrued I nsurance Benefits 8,86& 15,395 16,260 3,774 I 15,634 I 15,634 1_ ------------------------------------ _---------------------------------------------------------------- Total Total Personal Services 73,490 120,284 133,460- 28,452 ______ _ _-------------------------- I 150,618 1 150,618 1 PARTS 8 SUPPLIES ________________ 4210 Office Supplies 0 0 0 0 I 0 1 0 1 _________________________________________________________________:______--___-----__-________________________________-__________ 4220 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. Operating Supplies,- General 18 996 400 107 I 400 I 400 1 4222 Medical/Rescue/Safety Supplies 0 26 100 0 1 350 1 350 I. 4223 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bldg Operations/Cleaning Supp 0 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 1 90DEPT62 Enterprise Furl Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 - 62 SEVER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD 4224 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Clothing 8 Personal Equipment 582 608 :850 230 1 1,070 1 1,070 1 4230 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Repair B,Mtn Supplies -General 9,214 288 1,000 394 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 4231 Mobile,Equipment Repair Parts 3,653 1,134 2,000 104 1 .2,000 1 2,000 1 4232 Small Equip Repair Parts 0 127 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4233 Building Repair Parts. 0 107 0 0 1 0 I 0 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ V 4235 Motor Fuels 3,488 4,848 4,500 1,043 1 5,300 1 5,300 1 4236 Lubricants and Additives 170 70 250 13 1 250 1 250 1 -------------------------_-___----__------___________________________________._._____.______-----______________________________ 4237 Tires 458 316 800 0 1 800 1 800 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4239 Equip Oper Replacement Parts 0 1,577 2,500 0 1 2,500 1 .2,500 1 4240 Small Tools 383 281 1,000 164 1 1,000 1 1,000 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4241 Shop Materials 6 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4244 Chemicals 8 Chemical Products- m _ _ 0 0 250 0 1 '250 1 250 1 4250 Landscape Material 0 73 200 0 1 200 1 200 1 ----------•---------------- 4255 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------___-----___._.____, Street Repair Supplies 580 888 2,000 0 I 2,000 1 2,000 1 4257 Signs 8 Striping Material 472 196 '700 0 1 700 1 700 1 E 90DEPT62 Enterprise Furl Detai.led Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1996 Budget 1990 1990 62 SEWER. 1987 1988 .1989 Y -T -.D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4260 Utility System Parts/Supplies 0 7,055. 6,000 668 1. 8,000 1 8,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •�•� Total Parts 8 Supplies 19,024 18,790 22,550 2,723 1 25,820 I 25,820 I SERVICES B OTHER CHARGES ------------------------ 7,606 7,000 7,000 4310 .Prof Services - General 0 7,000 0 1 1 I --------------------------------------------------------------•---------------_----------------------------------------------- 4312 Engineering Services 0 0 1,500 3,357 1 1,500 1 1,500 I ----------------------------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------------------------- 4314 Auditing Services 3,300 3,500 3,750 0 1 3,950 1 -3,950 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4315 Prof Serv-Financial Non -Audit 0 139 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4330 Postage 4,093 4,817 6,000 1,311 I 6,500 1 6,000 1� ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4332 Telephone Equip/Installation 0 1,142 0, 0 I 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4335 Pager Service Fees 0 123 150 58 I 350 I 350 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4336 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Circuit Charges 617 994 850 290 I 850 1 850 I 4360 Insurance 5,395 6,314 5,730 468 1 7,590 I 7,590 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4374 Electricity -Lift Station 5,902 7,416 8,500 2,899 1 8,500 1 8,500 1 90DEPT62 _ Enterprise Fund Detailed. Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 62 SEWER 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D 'DEPT CITY ADMN -------- ACTUAL ...... ACTUAL ------ APPROP ------ 03-31-89 ....... REQUEST ------- RECDMMD ------- 4381 Mobile Equipment Repair 349 565 600 1,075 1 11500 1 11500 1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4382 SmalL Equipment Repair 28,568 333 '500 0 1. 500 1 500 I. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4383 Buildings Repair 0 0. 0 0 l 0 1 0 1 4385 Streets Repair 2,786 4,134 :3,000 0 1' 3,000 1 - 3,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------. 4386 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------z--------------------- Communication System Repair .250 0 400 0 1 400 I 400 1 4390 Utility System Repair 0 14,843 18,500 465 1 19,500 1 19,500 1 4397 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-- Machinery 8 Equipment Rental _197 357' 2,500 0 1 2,500 1 2,500 1 4410 Miscellaneous 4 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4411 Conferences 8'Schools 150 633 1,000 360 I, 1,000 1 1.,000 4413 Tuition Reimbursement 0 413 500 0 1 500 1 500 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4414 Dues B Subscriptions 21 0 50 _ 0 1 50 1 50 1 ------------------------------------------- 4415 Licenses/Permits/Taxes ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 24 106 150 0 _ I 150 1 150 1 -----------------------------------------------------------------------`-------------------------`-------------.-------------- 4417 Awards/Judgements/Losses 0 2,101 0 0 1 0 1 0. 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4426 Interest 5,112 0 0 0 1 0 1 0. I ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4440 Public Util Admin 0 82,600 86,700 21,675 1 91,000 1 91,000 1 906EPT62 Lard 6 Land Improvements Enterprise.Fund 0 62,500 0 .1 80,060 1 80,000 1 Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account Buildings 0 0 84,700 0 1990 Budget 144,500 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4570 --------------------------•-------------------------------------' Other Equipment 0 0 750 "'-' 584 P 5,550 1 '5,550 1 1990 1990 62 SEWER 0 1987 1988 1969 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADMN -------- 0 ACTUAL ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4441 Public Util-Central ServMaint 0 25,000 32,720 .8,186 l 35,300 I 35,300 I 4454 Solid Waste Removal 0 68 200 0 1 200 I 200 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4456 Tree Removal 0 3,472 4,500. 0 1 4,500 4 4,500 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________. 4475 MWCC Disposal Charges 1,461,743 1,646,542 1,902,000 475,445 I: 2,254,000 1. 2,254,000 1' *'•• ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Services 6 Other Chrgs 1,526,117 1,805,612 2,086,800 515,589 1 2,456,340 1 4,449;840 I CAPITAL OUTLAY -------------- 4510 Lard 6 Land Improvements 0 0 62,500 0 .1 80,060 1 80,000 1 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4520 Buildings 0 0 84,700 0 1 144,500 1 144,500 I ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 4570 --------------------------•-------------------------------------' Other Equipment 0 0 750 "'-' 584 P 5,550 1 '5,550 1 4580 Mobile Equipment 0 0 142,000 0 ._ 1 12,000 1 12,000 I •••• ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Total Capital Outlay 0 0 289,950 584 1 242,050 I 242,050 1 TRANSFERS' 90DEPT62 62 SEWER . Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1996 Budget 4710 Transfer Out -------------------------------------- Total Transfer -------------------------------------- TOTAL AMOUNT THIS -DIVISION 1,737,331, 1,984,386 2,532;760 547,348 1 2,908,528 1 2,908,028 1 __________________________________________________ 1990 1990 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D DEPT CITY ADNN ACTUAL ------ ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 ------ ------------- REQUEST ....... RECOMMD ------- 118,700 39,700 0 0 1 '39,700 1 39,700 1 ..............•---------------.--...--.---------------------------•-------------- 118,700 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39,700 0 0 1 39,700 1 39,700 1 TOTAL AMOUNT THIS -DIVISION 1,737,331, 1,984,386 2,532;760 547,348 1 2,908,528 1 2,908,028 1 __________________________________________________ m 90DEPT63 .Enterprise Fund Detailed Breakdown of Expenditures by Account 1990 Budget 1990 1990 63 STREET LIGHTING 1987 1988 1989 Y -T -D .DEPT CITY ADMN ------------------ ACTUAL .ACTUAL APPROP 03-31-89 REQUEST RECOMMD ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- ------- SERVICES & OTHER CHARGES --------------------'--- 4372 Electricity - Street Lights 47,873 60,520 63,220 .11,587 1 67;000 1 67,000 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •••• Total Services & Other Chrgs 47,873 60,520 63,220 11,587 1 67,000 1 67,000 I TOTAL AMOUNT THIS DIVISION 47,873 60,520 63,220 11,587 1 67,000 1 67,000 1 CAPITAL Department budget adjustments were made to remove the following capital items from operations to the equipment revolving fund: Community Development Vehicle/Topper/Telephone $ 14,150 Police Department Mobile Digital Terminals 138,000 Parks and Recreation 3/4 Ton 4X4 Pickup 16,000 Groundsmaster 11,500 Passenger Van 20.000 $199,650 The Fire Department is also requesting consideration of a $68,000 appropriation for an air/salvage vehicle. In the 1989 budget there was an appropriation of $30,000 with the accident involving the aerial truck a complete upgrade to that unit while. it is undergoing repairs seems more appropriate. That upgrade is expected to cost approximately $63,000 and therefore exhausts the two above- mentioned appropriations. The Fire Chief asked that the air/salvage vehicle then be given consideration from the Equipment Revolving Fund. He is aware that not all desired not all desired equipment can be purchased and that it might be necessary to consider this acquisition at a later date. Total proposed expenditures from the equipment revolving fund by department are as follows.: Community Development Vehicle/Topper/Phone $ 14,150 Police Investigative Car 13,000 Investigator Surveilance Van 17,000 Administrative Car 13,000 Unmarked Traffic Car 17,000 Mobile Digital Terminals 138,000 Fire Air/Salvage Vehicle 65,,000 Refurbish Unit #6 (Changed to Aerial Truck Upgrade) 36,000 Streets Loader with Plow & Wing 140,000 34 GVW Single Axle with Plow Wing, Underbody &Sander 75,000 Parks and Recreation (All Replacement) 3/4 Ton 4X4 Pickup 16,000 Groundsmaster 11,500 Passenger Van 20,000 One -Ton Truck 30,000 Tractor 44,000 Tree conservation One Ton Truck 23.000 $672,650 This proposed expenditure of $672,650 from the Equipment Revolving Fund exceeds the amount available of $384,520 by $288,13,0. It would be the recommendation of the City Administrator that an increase to the equipment certificate portion of the Equipment Revolving Fund be considered over the original amount .of $200,000. Because of the large increase in total tax capacity (assessed value) there would be little impact on the taxpayer relative to 1989 rates. A more precise impact will be determined when complete information is made available to the City. As you recall there was a great deal of discussion about the potential of this happening when the concept of this new fund was put in place with the 1989 budget. As we have seen so frequently, the State has again changed the rules with the levy limitations and the ground rules are substantially different than they were last year. If levy limits continue and especially if they become more restrictive, the only choice in purchasing equipment will be to finance it through the use of equipment certificates if on-going operations are going to be maintained at current levels. The following table illustrates this impact. General General 1989 Total BUDGET General Fund Equipment Eqmt Revolving Fund Fund General Capital As Revolving As a % Of Operations Cavital Fund A t of Total Fund Total/Gen Fund $9,787,510 $708,270 $10,495,780 6.74 $400,000 3.84 '1990 (10-10-899 BUDGET General General Total General Fund Equipment Eqmt Revolving Fund Fund General Capital As Revolving As a % Of Operations Capital Fund A I of Total Fund Total/Gen Fund $10,379,650 $387,480 $10,767,130 3.64 $672,650 6.24 Per Cent Change from 1989 to 1990 Increase (Decrease) General General Total General Fund Equipment Eqmt Revolving Fund Fund General Capital As Revolving As_a i Of Operations Capital Fund A % of Total Fund Total/Gen Fund 68 (45.34) 2.64 (46.38) 68.24 63.24 ?Z/ You will note that an increase in General Fund operations of approximately 6.0% from $9,787,510 to $10,379,650 requires a significant reduction in the amount of capital that can be financed through the General Fund. In the 6.0% increase of $592,140 in operations there is included $537,920 of personal services which includes only one (1) new employee and 10 additional hours for an existing clerical position. Personal services is 69.5% of the general operation for the 1989 budget and 70.5% of the general operations for the 10-10-89 proposed budget. It seems that the question becomes one of buying the equipment with equipment certificates or not buying it at all. There is very little opportunity to put it back into the General Fund without seriously impacting the current level of services.