10/17/2006 - City Council Regular (2)AGENDA
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
October 17, 2006
6:30 P.M
L ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
P• EL ADOPT AGENDA (At approximately 8:00 p.m. the Council will take a short recess)
III. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
A. APPROVE MINUTES
•�f7 B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
P• �) C. APPROVE CHECK REGISTERS
P• �Z D. APPROVE Exempt Permit for Faithfirl Shepherd Catholic School to hold a raffle on January 27, 2007
E. APPROVE a Pigeon License for Eric Drenckhahn, 2811 Pilot Knob Road
p• 1(0 F. PRESENT Assessment Roll and Schedule Public Hearing (November 21, 2006) for Project 877 (Lexington Avenue,
Lone Oak Road to'TH 55 — Street Improvement)
P. n G. APPROVE Fuel Escalation Clause to Snow and Ice Control Contractual Agreements .
?.IS H. ACKNOWLEDGE Completion and Authorize City Maintenance of Project 04-itEvergreen Enclave
P R I. APPROVE Vacation of Right of Way — Gun Club Road and APPROVE Final Subdivision and Final Planned
Development for Red Pine Crossing (SE of Red Pine Lane / Highway 3 in SE '/4 of Section 36)
A613 J. APPROVE Final Planned Development and Final Subdivision for LoNidy
P. K. APPROVE Extension for Recording the Final Plat of Manley Commercial Addition
Z$ L. APPROVE Ordinance, Resolution and Development Agreement for the Establishment of Cedar Bluffs Housing
Improvement Area and Approval of the Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Fee
P. 4v M. APPROVE Short Term Lease Agreement for Community Action Council/Armfid of Love at the Cedarvale Mall
�• q? N. Item Removed
P. 5d O. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing (Nov 21, 2006) for Project 942 (Deerwood Drive — Street
Overlay)
P. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing (Nov 21, 2006) for Project 943 (Wescott Road —Street
Overlay)
P. Ojj. Q. Approve PIN clarifications to Final Assessment Rolls for Projects #926,927,932 & 933 (Street Overlays)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
V. A. PROJECT 930, Final Assessment Hearing, Silver Bell Road (Nicoll Road —Kennebec Drive (Street Overlay
Improvements)
P• R(O B. PROJECT 931, Final Assessment Hearing, Art Rahn (Street Improvements)
VL OLD BUSINESS
Op 11*L A. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — Best Brands (Lot 1, Block 1, Best Brands 2°d Addition)
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. RECEIVE DRAFT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN and Authorize Public Comment
t� B. RECEIVE AND AFFIRM WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT — Madelyn Woods located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff
Road in the NE'/4 of Section 32.
Q• C.. PRELIMINARY SUBDMSION — Madelyn Woods — A Preliminary Subdivision of 6.7 acres to create 8 single
family lots located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road in the NE'/4 of Section 32.
P. ID. LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) — City Of Eagan
VIII. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE
IX. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (There are no items at this time)
X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XII. CLOSED SESSION
XUL ADJOURNMENT
The.City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and
employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or
status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96
hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid.
City of Earn Ycuo
To: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCILMEMBERS
From: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
Date: OCTOBER 13, 2006
Subject: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 17, 2006 CITY COUNCIL MTG
ADOPT AGENDA
After approval is given to the October 17, 2006 City Council agenda, the following items are in
order for consideration.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in fiuther detail, those items should be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is
brief.
A. APPROVE NHNUTES
ACTION TO BE
To approve the minutes of the October 3, 2006 regular City Council meeting, as presented or
modified.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Minutes !e October 3, 2006 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages
through C�
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ® A
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
Eagan, Minnesota
October 3, 2006
A Listening Session was held prior to the regular City Council meeting on October 3, 2006 in the Eagan Room.
There were no visitors who wished to be heard.
A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on October 3, 2006 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal
Center. Present were Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, Tilley, and Maguire. Also present were City
Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, Public Works Director Tom
Colbert, City Planner Mike Ridley, City Attorney Mike Dougherty, and Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk
Mira Pepper.
AGENDA
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented.
Aye:5 Nay:0
RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
A plaque was presented to the City Council by Mike Foertsch, SEH in recognition of Money Magazine's designation
of Eagan as one of the best places to live.
CONSENT AGENDA
Item B (Personnel Items) was pulled for discussion.
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councihnember Fields seconded a motion to approve the consent agenda as
amended Aye:5 Nay:0
A. Minutes. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the September 14, 2006 special City Council
meeting and the September 26, 2006 regular City Council meeting as presented
B. Personnel Items.
1. It was recommended to ratify the appointment of Jeff Johnson as Deputy Chief of Police.
Fields — Maguire 5-0
2. It was recommended to ratify the Police Officer contract Tilley — Fields 5-0
C. Check Regjsters. It was recommended to ratify the check register dated September 28, 2006 as presented.
D. Delinquent Utility Bills. It was recommended to set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to consider the
final assessment of the delinquent utility bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with
property taxes.
E. Delinquent False Alarm Bills. It was recommended to set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to
consider the final assessment of the delinquent false alarm bills and certify them to Dakota County for
collection with property taxes.
F. Delinquent Weed Cutting Bills. It was recommended to set a public hearing for November 9,.2006 to
consider the final assessment of the delinquent weed cutting bills and certify them to Dakota County for
collection with property taxes.
G. Liquor License. It was recommended to approve the on -sale liquor and Sunday license for Tim Out
Management Eagan, Inc. dba Time Out Restaurant & sports Bar, 2864 Highway 55, Suite 900.
H: Project 928. It was recommended to receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 928 (Alexander Road /
Meadowview Road — Street Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 9, 2006.
I. Election Judges. It was recommended to approve the list of election judges for the November 7, 2006
General Election.
J. Capital Improvement Plan It was recommended to approve Dakota County's draft 5 -year Transportation
Capital Improvement Program for 2007-2011.
K. Housing Improvement Policy. It was recommended to approve an Amendment of the City's policy related
to Housing Improvement Districts to require replacement reserve studies meet Community Associations
Institute's National Reserve Study standards and performed by certified CAI reserve specialists.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 2
®RAFT
L. Short Tenn Lease. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of short term lease agreement for
Community Action Council — Armfiil of Love Program at Cedarvale Mall.
M. Energy Saving Equipment. It was recommended to award a contract to Harris Contracting Company to
install additional energy saving equipment at the Eagan Civic Arena, authorize the Mayor to sign the
appropriate documents and adjust the approved 2007 budget.
N. Donation. It was recommended to accept a donation of $200 to be used to place perennial plants or a tree
in Central Park.
O. Tobacco License. It was recommended to approve a tobacco license for Jacque Johnson, selling under the
name of Eagan Citgo at 4205 Nicola Road, Eagan.
P. Tobacco License. It was recommended to approve a tobacco license for Kaku Investments, Inc., selling
under the name of Go For It Gas at 4206 Nicols Road, Eagan, subject to approval by the Police
Department.
B. Personnel Items.
a. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to ratify the
appointment of Jeff Johnson as Deputy Chief of Police.
b. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to ratify the Police
Officer contracL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PROJECT 932, WHISPERING WOODS ADDITIONS / SLATER ACRES / SLATER ROAD
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Whispering Woods
Additions, Slater Acres / Slater Road. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll
for Project 932 (Whispering Woods Additions / Slater Acres / Slater Road — Street Overlay Improvements) and
authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PROJECT 933, TOWN CENTRE DR. / O'LEARY LANE / GOLFVIEW DRIVE
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS — FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Town Centre Drive /
O'Leary Lane / Golfview Drive. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for
Project 933 (Town Centre Dr. / O'Leary Lane / Golfview Drive — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PROJECT 926, SADDLEHORN / SUNSET / NORTH -VIEW MEADOWS ADDITIONS
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Saddlehom / Sunset /
Northview Meadows Additions. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes L) ` A /. T
October 3, 2006
Page 3
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for
Project 926 (Saddlehom / Sunset Additions / Northview Meadows — Street Overlay improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PROJECT 927, MEADOWLAND 1sT / BEAVER DAM ROAD / SUNCLIFF 1n — 5TO ADDITIONS
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Meadowland 1" /
Beaver Dam Road / Suncliff 1 5a Additions street overlay improvements. Public Works Director Colbert gave
staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll for
Project 927 (Meadowland 1" / Beaver Dam Road / Suncliff 1" — 5b Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER NO.4
EASEMENT VACATION
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding an easement vacation for Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale
Corporate Center No. 4. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council
Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the vacation of a portion of
public drainage and utility easements within Lot 1, Block 1 Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4 and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
LOT 2, BLOCK 1, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 5TH ADDITION EASEMENT VACATION
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility
easements within Lot 2, Block 1, Eagandale Office Park 5t" Addition. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff
report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve the vacation of a portion of
public drainage and utility easements within Lot 2, Block 1 Eagandale Office Park 5'h Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING
IMPROVEMENT AREA AND IMPOSITION OF FEES ON HOUSING UNITS WITHIN THIN CEDAR
BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area and
imposition of fees on housing units within the area.. Community Development Director Hohenstein gave a staff
report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing.
Dan Cooper, President of the Cedar Bluff Homeowners Association discussed the proposed improvements to the
Cedar Bluff buildings.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 4
®R,q FT
Jim Rosbold, Secretary / Treasurer of the Homeowners Association thanked the Council for considering the
proposed loan.
There being no further public comment, Mayor Geagan closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the
Council.
Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to direct preparation of the following:
1. An ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvements Area.
2. A resolution imposing fees on housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area to
finance improvements.
3. A Development Agreement between the City and the Association.
Aye: 5 Nay:0
OLD BUSINESS
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT — WINTER SEASON PARKING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding an amendment to City Ordinance 9.09 (Winter Season
Parking) relating to winter parking regulations on certain city streets that have either even addresses on both sides of
the street or odd addresses on both sides of street. Public Works Director Colbeft gave a staff report.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve an amendment to City
Ordinance 9.09 (Winter Season Parking) relating to winter parking regulations on certain city streets that have either
even addresses on both sides of the street or odd addresses on both sides of the street and authorize publication in the
City's legal newspaper for two weeks. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ,
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve a resolution establishing winter
season parking regulations as proposed by the City Engineer for Denmark Trail East/West and Denmark Court
EasWVest and authorize the installation of regulatory street signs. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CONTRACT 06-08, NORTH RIDGE DRIVE AND SIBLEY TERMINAL
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding storm drainage improvements on Contract 08-08 (North
Ridge Drive and Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. Public Works Director Colbert gave.a staff report. Assistant City
Engineer John Gorder discussed the neighborhood meetings where the design and construction of the storm drainage
pipe was reviewed.
Councilmembers discussed the options for the construction of corrective storm drainage improvements.
Vince McGowan, Knoll Wood Court, discussed the auguring option which would cause more damage to his
property. He expressed concern over costs that he will incur.
Residents of the property adjacent to a portion of the proposed project (3 864 and 3868 North Ridge Drive) thanked
Council and commended Assistant City Engineer John Gorder'for his work on the project. They discussed
recommendations made by a soil specialist and requested that two trees be transplanted and replacement of
decorative rock be made in the disturbed areas.
Councilmembers discussed three alternate bids for the project. It was the consensus of the Council to approve
Alternate #3, which provides for the jacking / auguring of the proposed new storm sewer pipe between the existing
homes at 3864 and 3868 North Ridge Drive.
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to continue consideration to award
Conhact 06-08 (North Ridge Drive and Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Drainage Improvements) to S.M.
Hentges and Sons, Inc. for Alternate #3 to the November 9th City Council meeting (or sooner). Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 5
NEW BUSINESS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — BYERLY'S
"PAFT
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor
display of fresh produce at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place. City Planner Ridley gave a staff
report.
The number of bins to display fresh produce outside the store was discussed by Council and a representative of
Byerly's. It was the consensus of the Council that three bins be allowed.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow outdoor display of fresh produce at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally
described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the
Dakota County Recorder's office.
2. Fresh produce display shall be limited to three 4' x 4' bins located between the building and the
pillars near the front entrance.
3. Outside display shall occur only between May 1 and November 15 of each year.
4. Outside display items shall consist only of fresh seasonal produce. All items displayed shall be
confined to the bins themselves, and shall not extend onto the sidewalk or other areas around the
bins or along the storefront.
5. The bins shall not exceed 16 square feet each, and shall be painted a neutral color to match the .
building. The bins may have the Byerly's name displayed on one side.
6. One pricing sign may be displayed for each bin. The signs shall be uniform in design, and shall
not exceed the proposed 11" x 7" size.
7. No more than two propane cages shall be permitted Placement of the propane cages shall be
adjacent to the building and in compliance with applicable fire codes and ordinances.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — INTERSTATE PARTNERS
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow a detached
trash enclosure at 2864 Highway 55. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report
Matt Miller representing Interstate Partners discussed the location of the trash enclosure.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Carlson seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in
the east 1/2 of Section 2, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Maguire opposed)
1. The applicant shall enter into an amended Planned Development Agreement that memorializes the approval
of a detached enclosure.
2. The applicant shall record the amended Planned Development Agreement against Lot 3, Block 1, Grand
Oak Five.
3. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan (with Building Permit application) that illustrates
additional plantings in the area of the enclosure.
4. The enclosure shall be located and constructed as shown on the Site/Details Plan sheet dated 8-16-06.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow temporary signage on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east
'/x of Section 2, subject to the following conditions. Ay: 5 Nay: 0
1. The applicant is allowed two temporary signs not to exceed a total of 50 square feet.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 6
1)P'q FT
2. The applicant is allowed to display two temporary signs until the Tim Out Bar and Restaurant opens or
December 31, 2006, whichever comes first.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — WELLS FARGO
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow a third
automatic teller machine at the Wells Fargo facility at 3390 Pilot Knob Road. City Planner Ridley gave a staff
report.
Councihnember Carlson moved, Councihnember Fields seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow a third automatic teller machine for their facility at 3390 Pilot Knob Road (Lot 1, Block 1,
Norwest V Addition) on the northeast comer of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads in the SW ''A of Section 10
subject to the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. The applicant shall enter into a Planned Development Amendment Agreement wit the City and record same
against Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1" Addition.
2. The installation of the third ATM and widening of the drive aisle shall comply with the Site Plan dated
August 16, 2006, and the three ATMs shall have the some appearance. Plan that adds a
3. The applicant shall provide (with the Building Permit application) a revised Landscape
grouping of non -evergreen ornamental trees in the area east and north of the pylon sign to improve and
balance the aesthetics at this high profile intersection. application.
4. The applicant shall provide grading and drainage information with the Building Permit app
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — SUPERIOR AUTO CENTER
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow the
expansion of the existing auto service facility, to include a collision center at 3425 Washington Drive. City Planner
Ridley gave a staff report.
Quinn Hudson, representing the applicant discussed the proposed expansion and upgrades to the existing facility.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Maguire seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow the expansion of the existing auto service facility to include a collision center at 3425
Washington Drive on Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition located in the NF 1/4 of Section 16 subject to
the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. The applicant shall execute and record a Planned Development Agreement at Dakota County within 60 days
of the date of Council approval and proof of its recording be provided to the City.
2. The two parcels shall be replatted into one lot.
3. The replatted parcel shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the site.
4. All maintenance, detailing and collision repair shall only occur inside the building.
5. New and updated building facades shall be constructed per the submitted elevation plan dated 8-16-06.
6. The outdoor storage area, as depicted on the Site Plan dated 8-16-06, shall be enclosed by an opaque, 8' tall
privacy fence.
7. All employee and vehicles in the service queue shall be located in the enclosed storage area.
8. in no instance shall customer vehicles be parked overnight outside of the enclosure.
9. Landscaping shall be installed as shown on the plan dated 8-16-06.
LEGISLATIVE / INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE
There was no legislative / intergovernmental affairs update.
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
City Administrator Hedges discussed a proposed passport service to be located at the Eagan Community Center.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 7
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to designate the Egan Community Center
as a passport service center. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There were no visitors who wished to be heard.
It was noted that a closed session of the Economic Development Authority would be held following the regular
Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
Date Administrative Secretary / Deputy City Clerk
le, audio
., please
If you aneed these minutes in an n, 3830 Pilots Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (65 ) 675orm such as large -5000, (ITDD phone:�(651)454-853 )nom the City
of Egan,
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities,
facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual
orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Eagan Community Center Organizational Change/Advertisement
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the proposed reorganization of the clerical support staff in Community Development
by replacing one Clerical Tech III with a Clerical Tech IV and authorize the advertisement of a
Clerical Tech IV. ,
FACTS:
• The Community Development Department presently has one Office Supervisor, 2 full- .
time and one'/, time (30 hours a week) Clerical Tech III's.
• With the resignation of one of the full-time Clerical Techs, department management met
to consider various options to reorganize the department.
• With the anticipated upcoming retirement of the Office Supervisor, replacing the vacant
Clerical Tech III with a Clerical Tech IV with a higher level of duties would allow for the
replacement of the Office Supervisor at a lower pay step with a savings, beginning in
mid -2007, to be applied to the upgraded clerical position.
• The Clerical Tech IV position would function as a lead to the other clerical techs as well
as additional higher level duties in the department.
• The intent of this reorganization is to shift duties within the support team and create the
capacity for the Office Supervisor. replacement in 2007 to incorporate other support duties
for the department.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
C RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To ratify the check registers dated October 5, 2006 and October 12, 2006
as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
Check registers dated October 5, 2006 and October 12, 2006 are enclosed without
page number.
Agenda Memo
October 17, 2007
Regular City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA:
D. EXEMPT PERMIT FOR FAITHFUL SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
Approve Exempt Permit for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School to hold a raffle on
January 27, 2007 at 3355 Columbia Drive.
FACTS:
Faithful Shepherd Catholic School has applied for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt
Permit to hold a raffle at the school on January 27, 2007
All requirements of the application have been met and staff deems it in order for approval
The raffle is an annual event for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School
ATTACHMENTS:
• Attached on page 5— is a copy of the proposed resolution approving the exempt
permit.
• The application is available for review in the Administration Department
RESOLUTION
CITY OF EAGAN
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM
LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE
FAITHFUL SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL
WHEREAS, the Faithful Shepherd Catholic School has applied for an Exemption
from Lawful Gambling License; and
WHEREAS, the Eagan Police Department has reviewed the application and has
not identified any reason to deny; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eagan,
Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby approves the Exemption from Lawful Gambling
License for the Faithful Shepherd Catholic School to conduct a raffle on January 27,
2007 at 3355 Columbia Drive in Eagan.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
It's Mayor
Attest:
It's Clerk
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Those in Favor: All
Those Against: None
Date: October 17, 2006
CERTIFICATION
I, Maria Petersen, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof
assembled this 17" day of October, 2006.
Maria Petersen, City Clerk
Agenda Memo
October 17, 2007
Regular City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA:
E. PIGEON LICENSE FOR ERIC DRENCKHAHN, 2811 PILOT KNOB ROAD
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
Approve a Pigeon License for Eric Drenckhahn, 2811 Pilot Knob Road
FACTS:
• Erick Drenchkhahn has requested a permit to house pigeons on his property at 2811 Pilot
Knob Road
• The City Council approved three variances in relation to the structures on Mr.
Drenchkahahn's property at the September 5a' Council meeting
• The Animal Control Officer visited the property and reported that all requirements of the
application have been met and that the premises is in excellent condition .
• Staff deems this application in order for approval
• Mr. Drenchkhahn will be out of town and unable to attend the Council meeting. He has
requested that the item be tabled should there be any issues be raised by Council
ATTACHMENTS:
Attached on page l� is a copy of an e-mail to the City Council from Mr.
Drenchkhahn
The application is available for review in the Administration Department
Page 1 of 1
Mira Pepper
From: edrenckh@comoast.net
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 7:49 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Next Weeks Council Meeting
I will be out of town for the meeting when the Council will consider issuance of my Pigeon Permit. I
spoke with Myra and she advised that since the permit was on the consent addenda, and my inspection
went well, it should not be a problem.
I do not have any issues with this, however I would like to request that if there are any issues, the item
be tabled for a future meeting.
Thank you for all of your past work and good luck in the upcoming election!
Eric Drenckhahn
I nionnnr%
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
F. PROJECT 877 LEXINGTON AVENUE LONE OAK ROAD TO TH 55
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 877
(Lexington Avenue, Lone Oak Road to Trunk Highway 55 — Street Reconstruction and
Overlay) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 21, 2006.
FACTS:
Project 877 provided for street rehabilitation to the north one mile of Lexington
Avenue (County State Aid Highway 43). The northern 1/3`d of this section was
reconstructed and realigned when I -35E was built in 1983 and needed a structural
maintenance mill and overlay as part of the project. The middle segment was over 35
years old with significant distresses and did not meet County structural design
standards. This segment required a full reconstruction with new concrete curb and
gutter. The southern segment was fully reconstructed in 1993 with the upgrade of the
Lone Oak Road intersection and needed only a surface mill and overlay.
• The City was the lead agency on the improvement of this County highway. In
accordance with County policy, the City is obligated to participate in 45% of the cost
of any reconstruction (i.e. middle section) and all new trail installations. The City's
policy for financing this obligation is to levy a special assessment against the adjacent
properties benefiting from these street upgrade improvements. The trail improvement
is not assessable and will be financed from the City's Major Street and Trail Fund.
• This project, constructed under Contract 04-04, has been completed, all costs
tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. The assessments are based upon the
City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for all such assessable properties.
• This roll is now being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a
public hearing to formally present the final costs to be levied against the benefited
properties.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled prior to the final
assessment hearing with the affected property owners and address any concerns.
• The final assessments are equal to or less than the estimate contained in the feasibility
report presented at the public hearing held on March 16, 2004. Residential property
assessments are based upon an appraised value stipulated in the feasibility report.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the amendments to contractual snow
plowing agreements with Gallagher's, Inc for the street and cul de sac snow removal and
Bever Landscaping for trail and sidewalk snow removal for the 2006-2007 winter season
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
In the Fall of 2005, the City of Eagan advertised for sealed quotations for the 2005-
2006 snow and ice control season/operations for our supplemental assistance on our
streets, trails and sidewalks. For the 2006-2007 snow and ice season, both
contractors have agreed to maintain their same fees and rates if the City will
consider approving an amendment allowing for a fuel surcharge due to the historical
fluctuations in fuel prices.
Gallagher's, Inc., was the successful bidder for the street and cul de sac snow
removal and Bever Landscaping was the successful bidder for trail and sidewalk
snow removal. Both contractors have agreed to the terms of the fuel surcharge
amendment as prepared by the City Attorney's office.
The new fuel surcharge amendment allows for an incremental re -imbursement of
fuel purchased over $2.50 per gallon for diesel grade gasoline of for the 2006-2007
snow and ice control season.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
H. DEVELOPMENT ACCEPTANCE & MAINTENANCE
AUTHORIZATION — CITY PROJECT 04R
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Acknowledge the completion of public
infrastructure improvements for City Project No. 04-R (Evergreen Enclave Addition)
under terms of the Development Agreement and authorize perpetual City maintenance
subject to warranty provisions.
FACTS:
Evergreen , Enclave Addition is a 7 -lot single family residential subdivision
constructed north of Diffley Road west of Lexington Way. This development
required the constructing public sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer, along
with site grading, which were all performed privately by the developer under the
terms and conditions of the development contract agreement.
The improvements have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public
Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action for
acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions.
This acceptance does not constitute a release of the developer's responsibility under
conditions of the development contract to convey Outlot A, Evergreen Enclave to the
City of Eagan in fulfillment of the development's park dedication requirements.
Financial securities will remain in place to guarantee this conveyance to the City.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council
I. FINAL SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (RED
PINE CROSSING) — REVESTORS, INC.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the Vacation of a portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club Road) west of Biscayne
Avenue in the SE `/4 of Section 36.
To approve a Final Subdivision (Red Pine Crossing) to create two lots upon approximately 9.82
acres located south of Red Pine Lane and east of Hwy. 3 in the SE'/4 of Section 36.
To approve a Final Planned Development (Red Pine Crossing) to allow three commercial retail
buildings on approximately 9.82 acres located south of Red Pine Lane and east of Hwy. 3 in the
SE'/< of Section 36.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Councilmembers present.
FACTS:
➢ The Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development were approved April
4, 2006.
➢ A public hearing regarding the Vacation of Gun Club Road right-of-way was held on July
18, 2006. City Council action on the vacation was continued to be concurrent with the
final plat for Red Pine Crossing.
D All documents and agreements have been signed and are in order for execution at the
. regular meeting of the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS (2): �/►
July 18, 2006 A€ nnda memo and City Council meeting minutes, pages Lam/ through
24
Final Plat, page UL
Agenda Information Memo
July 18, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
D. GUN CLUB ROAD - RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the Public Hearing and continue consideration
of the vacation of i portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club Road) to be concurrent with
the Final Plat approval of Red Pine Crossings.
FACTS:
• On January 20, 2006, City staff received a petition from Quinn Hutson, CNH
Architects representing Revestors, Inc., the developers of proposed Red Pine
Crossing, requesting the vacation of a portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club
Road) adjacent to Parcels 10-03600-021-79 and 10-03600-022-79 (Red Pine
Crossing), east of Highway 3 in southeast Eagan.
• The petition was held to coincide with the final subdivision approval process for the
Red Pine Crossing development.
• On June 12, 2006, final subdivision submittal was made by the developer of Red Pine
Crossing, Revestors, Inc.
• The purpose of the request is to allow the developer to construct the Red Pine
Crossing development as approved with the preliminary planned development and
subdivision, with utilization of the vacated Gun Cub Road right-of-way.
The Gun Club Road right-of-way east of the Red Pine Crossing development will
remain.
• Notices for the public hearing were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all
potentially affected and/or interested parties for .comment prior to the scheduled
public hearing. Notices were sent to all the potentially impacted private utility
companies. No objections to the proposed vacation have been received as of the date
of this report.
• Consideration of the Red Pine Crossing final subdivision is scheduled at the August 1
Council meeting.
• There are private utilities (Dakota Electric Associations power lines and other
utilities) within this portion of right-of-way proposed to be vacated that will require
the Red Pine Crossing development to dedicate easements to cover the relocation of
the existing utilities.
• The request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order
for favorable Council action in conjunction with the final subdivision and plat
approval of Red Pine Crossing at a future Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map, page
• Right -of -Way Vacation Exhibit, page
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
July 18, 2006
Page 3
authorize the acquisition of the pond easement for the appraisal estimate; and authorize the on of
de plans and specifications for a contract to be let within two Years. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PRO 929, RED PINE LANE / GUN CLUB ROAD STREET & ROVEMENTS
City Administrator He � introduced this item regarding street and utility ' ements on Red Pine Lane /Gun
Club Road. Traffic Engin ath gave a staff reporL
Mayor Geagan opened the p6lic
Two residents of Red Pine Court suggested Rote
a sidewalk be installed.
Mark Piper, 4895 Biscayne Avenue, dis the
should be assessed for the improve m as he pai
building is already connected to er and water.
improved signage at the crosswalk, and
to his property, stating he does not feel be
Biscayne Avenue improvements and his
There being no further, c comment, Mayor Geagan closed the public and turned discussion back to the
Council.
Councihnemb Carlson moved Councilmembcr Fields seconded a notion to approve Proje (Red
Pine Lane /
Gun Club ad — Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans
suet tions. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
GUN CLUB ROAD —RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
CitAdministrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the vacation of a portion of public right of -way. He noted
that it was recommended that consideration of this item be continued to be concurrent with the final Plat approval
City of
Red Pine Crossing. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councihnember Tilley moved, Councihnember Fields seconded a motion to close the public hearing and continue
consideration of the vacation of a portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club Road) to be concurrent with the Final
Plat approval of Red Pine Crossing. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VARIANCES — EAGAN AUTO MALL
City Administrato es introduced this item regarding a request for a variance to allow a ed trash
enclosure and a variance o et to the 50 foot front yard setback for a detached gave
mthe
repC CSC
district for the Eagan Auto Mall to at 1379 Town Centre Drive. City PI dley g
Mayor Geagsn opened the public hearing.
discussion back to the Council-
Councihnember Fields moved, Col
trash enclosure in the CSC district
Section 15, subject to the followin
closed the public hearing and turned
,T�Seconded a to approve a Variance to allow a detached
r Auto Mall located at 13 wn Centre Drive in the NW '/. of
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. If within Foner approval,the variance shall not have been completed or it shall become null
and voidpetition for extension has been granted by the Council. Such extension be requested in
ori ' days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or
the use permitted in the variance.
J
RED PINE
/ t
Yeinity Map _ /
selF. Fa remN n. anee a
M STd.
Cy' ;
N/
,Z/ t
t
M M M a M SOu1MYl Pmlx �,1,` pI d
N 4[bn M lemM T. Mme• Il b � '/ f f t:
mane ro iew a Msbl.a HPP C[ t t. t .
mwSl M T •.Ms M r.we:e
Ibw IY IN II
• Pmaln T Wmmnl Ip/W /
T ;
le �L-'-- / /• � pf
Pv o Yx a aew w✓ ma.+v " / i�� / f,^— � J
61 Fn4 v.w eTnan,Md , s /
I JI/ LAND J
`! (g0
CROSSING ��F°°���.�:�a._.Mm.I�.IM.a.as.M�.a..,.M.�,.aM�✓:...:d....,.b
dmW b M fw4 a POM. Ab x IRMMs b wt
M Mfi AO M1 ✓ M ,YP.n1 PSM a M SYIw: NmM a Fabs M TTN FF. IYY. a .mIH':�I / b a
4 / O / qYM �Ia 4 M ml�Iwile�Rial� b M :aSm10s Immo. m1 IM Wm�b
// � • N
r//'�H �r w M �r:w + �.°Nm"M' aotw'r�.rn, s w+w� Ibb'd't.":'s aM:F M'lib�as ✓"°"o..'p.'ip0`M +"
IF911U2 vd1 Y M OanM rx Fn.d
�` ;� ��\ OL'��F ww rP.s M nm ro a w..e...r ober . I107 nrr aossbo nx a Mq,,, .pysb+b �w �..N a ew�m w FSM• •• b:m.
..{F�"'���Q,p}y���• M PrmoMsa ax xm MM. M .wmnb m awn m M M M b.MY
'/�Ia/ FF�Ag \ YaaPr .laOAs aM
Y ✓ems r.� W YsePI Owv� . IIeM.eY bNlr W V Mm.n I:m mmr Mn Pmsm
anPl w a bP
O.W. a abnn ~"&
O a�a.baT—
/' M Ynodq Fa1nPYn1 ... mbrox.mr Mw •ro nA�sm a moa 4 Wb:m IF Y:Meeb PM 1Huee a
�j aw.M PUP .. ,K . Pa:xaF bdr b.ilb senPenan EiYd a��
n
`� �`- ```-� I O m:.y.mi/ IYI I Im. M.MI N MxM W A✓b YMI m PY da m I® mF � Pb W dN Y s mnnl lrsneYm
- ��``'I F^ d W Yn.F Pwf d !MM aP M:w.M dem m W OM F: M1a M MSNW d e M.t M d neMmN rm Me aa:Mb a+mY b
s L3 ywddm�ipii°ydm �yw, �.�F.�WnmF. a rp:aes a W oa . +�. F � �yw�l• °1e m .x ar m rmm Y Iwmeb
�T
I •'
I ••- M amdM S^.N'. crFbb T awwlMpr blr. w Pb_ab H . lma b Tsnm i Mn. :Msh
I tp IYn.. w un..
1 I —
I '
m � W M.ebv: F9.m JwnF Fa tPIP
I
1r i M w Mb mM wt m w_M a� Nm w Pb CW a [Mn Ylwmm 4vmr db W6
\IP �
yp �
i: Mm4 w FOadx Fano. wWw waw w dx em rn mxmr N _.m ✓ . as
rM c uM.m. PY Mas Pmv..
1
I
I -
eee.��� I I naeeF maW m w mW w M F.s FPm M W as rmw r us FYI m nm os am...F n... Yw reb ms m rbm✓s
l bm, a em r PxM..F.r Pb_r/ a . aoea .
Ua
rt a 9'1 E IIiTN 88718 STREET �. EAST 5 I Mori I:ot m MmbaMF w we M W ane. a W owb ams. M exwe m N _w a . aeos x
_r_x w s+t Mmr Y rd a aew—
IymT lis
Pnw L:PMa✓PeP.s M MMry ✓MFelesl .
m M Iws�Y it Mw Y
eMnl
a Ym•m: P+b. _. __ __ _ _e Rehder and Associates. Inc.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council
J. FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL SUBDIVISION (LO
NIDY — FORMERLY GOPHER COMMONS) - GOPHER RESOURCES
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a Final Subdivision of 21 acres to create 3 Lots and ,one Outlot on property located
in the southwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Highway 149 in the NW '/4 of Section 13;
subject to conditions in the July 6, 2006 City Council minutes.
To approve a Final Planned Development to allow a 52,500 SF office/warehouse building on
Lot 2, Block 1, Lo Nidy, located in the southwest comer of Yankee Doodle Road and Highway
149 in the NW Y4 of Section 13; subject to conditions in the July 6, 2006 City Council minutes.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of members present
FACTS:
➢ The City Council approved a Preliminary Subdivision (on July 6, 2006) of a site that
consists of a single, vacant unplatted parcel. A concrete recycling facility previously
operated on the site for a number of year;..
➢ The overall proposal consists of three office/warehouse buildings; users are not identified
and shall be consistent with permitted Limited Industrial uses. Final Planned
Development approval will be required for each parcel.
➢ As a Planned Development, parking will be shared and the overall parking is exceeded by
41 parking,stalls.
➢ Outdoor storage is not proposed at this time and would require a Planned Development
Amendment if future outdoor storage is needed
ISSUES:
➢ The Dakota County Plat Commission originally did not approve the preliminary plat due
to access issues. Those issues have been resolved.
ATTACHMENTS: (2)
Plat map on page �.
Development plan for Lot 2 on page 25 .
Lo
Nldy
PARK
- - - - - - - - - -
-
f: ii A
w
"Wr SUM
YAMKEE�., DOODLE ROAD
M
SY
...
4-1 -------
-----------
-------
01� A
B
0
.. ....... .......
A
J-
- - - - - - - - - -
II .I
7 I t tl ii.
/
/
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting
K EXTENSION FOR RECORDING FINAL PLAT — MANLEY COMMERCIAL
ADDITION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a 60 -day extension of time to record the final plat for Manley Commercial Addition,
located on O'Neill Drive south of I-494 and west of Argenta Trail in the NE'/4 of Section 1.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Councilmembers present
FACTS:
➢ The City Council approved the final plat on August 15, 2006. The plat is required to be
recorded within 60 days of approval.
D The applicant has submitted a letter with this request explaining the reasons for the
extension.
D The 60 -day extension would allow until December 14, 2006 for the plat to be recorded.
ATTACHMENTS (1):
Letter from Ben Sporer, Landform, page ZI
71w
AIL
WMA
LANDFORM
MINNEAPOLIS• PHOENIX
October 2, 2006
Pam Dudziak
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Final Plat —Manley Addition
Dear Ms. Dudziak,
J, OCT i3. 3� L,vl-ilto
All i
While we've made every effort to stay on track with required city schedules regarding
this project, we may be close to the 60 days required for the final recording of the Final
Plat.. This letter serves as a request for an extension on behalf of the current applicant,
Larry Laukka. Please find the enclosed check in the amount of $75.00. Also, please
call me directly with any questions, 612.638.0263.
Be ' mi Sporer, Project Designer
Bs/bs
COPY:
ENCL: check #
landform Engineering Company doing business as Landform
BOOC BUTLER SQUARE 100 NORTH 6TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55403
OFFICE: 612.252.9070 FAX: 512.252.9077 www.landform.net
Agenda Information Memo
Eagan City Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
October 17, 2006
L.
To approve the implementation of a Housing bnprovement District under Minnesota
Statutes Sections 428A.11 -428A.21 by the adoption of -
1.
f
1. An ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvements Area.
2. A resolution imposing fees on housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing
Improvement Area to finance improvements.
3. A Development Agreement between the -City and the Association.
FACTS:
The owners of the Cedar Bluff Townhomes have requested that the City establish
a Housing Improvement Area to finance the replacement of patio doors and
windows and to repair concrete and.foundations:
A city may create a Housing Improvement Area to finance improvements to the
common areas of condo and townhome associations when other financing cannot
be obtained. This financing mechanism was adopted by the state legislature
because homeowner associations cannot readily obtain financing; they have very
little collateral and cannot mortgage individual's units. Within a Housing
Improvement Area, the City may finance housing improvements and recover the
cost by assessing fees, much like special assessments. The fees are assessed
against each unit, and appear on the property tax statement to be paid by the
individual homeowners with their taxes.
• The sequence of events that has preceded this action is as follows:
o In 2005, the City Council was approached by the Cedar Bluffs
Homeowners Association regarding the potential creation of a City policy
for the creation of Housing Improvement District .
o In response, the City Council adopted a policy on September 20, 2005 that
would permit consideration of petitions and the process by which
applications would be reviewed.
o On April 4, 2006, the City Council received the Cedar Bluffs
Homeowners Association preliminary application and petition and
authorized staff to request that the Association make a formal submittal of
improvement plans, detailed financial plans and a fee to cover City costs
associated with the detailed review.
o Those submittals were made and reviewed by City staff, the City
Attorney, the Dakota County CDA and Ehlers and Associates, the City's
fiscal consultant. They are in order for formal consideration through the.
public hearing process.
o On September 5, 2006 the City Council adopted a resolution calling for a
public hearing on October 3, and notice was duly published and
distributed to the owners of each unit, as required by state law. On
October 3, 2006, the public hearing was held and the Council directed the
preparation of the ordinance, resolution and development agreement noted
in the action item above.
The total cost of the improvements, including financing costs, is estimated to be
$767,900. The City will make a loan to the association in an amount up to
$767,900 at an interest rate of 5.5% and amortized over 15 years. The proposed
annual housing improvement fee will be set at 105% of the annual principal and
interest due.
• . The proposed fee for each homeowner is:
o $660.45 per year ($55.04 per month)
o $6,368.44 total if paid in fall
ATTACHMENTS:
o Ordinance on pagesW through
o Resolution imposing fees on the housing units on es through
o Development Agreement on es S� through
o Review schedule on page I
o Location map on page 43
v preliminary project costs and fee estimates on page
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING
IMPROVEMENT AREA PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES,
SECTIONS 428A.11 to 428A.21.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Eagan ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11
to 428A-21 (the "Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within which housing
improvements are made or constructed and the costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in
part from fees imposed within the area
1.02. The Eagan City Council ("Council') has adopted a Housing Improvement Area
policy.
1.03. The City has determined a need to establish the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area as further defined herein, in order to facilitate certain improvements to property known as the
"Cedar Bluff Condominiums," all in accordance with the Housing Improvement Area policy.
1.04. The City has consulted with the Cedar Bluff Condominium Association, Inc. (the
"Condominium Association") and the condominium owners regarding the establishment of the
Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area and the housing improvements to be constructed and
financed under this ordinance.
Section 2. Fes.
2.01. The Council finds that, in accordance with Section 428A.12 of the Act, owners of at
least 25 percent of the housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area have filed a
petition with the City Clerk requesting a public hearing regarding establishment of such housing
improvement area.
2.02. On October 3, 2006, the City conducted a public hearing, duly noticed in accordance
with Section 428A-13 of the Act, regarding adoption of this ordinance, at which all persons,
including owners of property within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, were given an
opportunity to be heard.
2.03. The Council finds that, without establishment of the Cedar Bluff Housing
Improvement Area, the Housing Improvements (as hereinafter defined) could not be made by the
condominium association for, or the housing unit owners in, the Condominium Association.
2.04. The Council f ether finds that designation of the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area is needed to maintain and preserve the housing units within such area.
2.05 The City will be the implementing entity for the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area and the improvement fee.
2.06 The Council finds that the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area meets each of
the approval criteria contained in the Housing Improvement Area Policy, including the criterion that
a majority of the condominium association owners support the project and the Housing
Improvement Area financing. The Condominium Association presented evidence to the Council
adequate to demonstrate that these criteria were met, including Presentation to the Council of the
petitions described in 2.01 above.
Section 3. Housing Improvement Area Defined
3.01. The Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area is hereby defined as the area of the City
legally described as Units I —120, Cedar Bluffs Townhome Condominiums (CIC 358).
3.02. The Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area contains 120 housing units as of the date
of adoption of this ordinance.
Section 4. Housing hnnrovements Defined
4.01. For the purposes of this ordinance and the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area,
the term "Housing improvements" shall mean the following improvements to the housing
units and common areas withinthe Cedar B1uffHousing Improvement Area:
Window and patio door replacement in each unit and foundation repair
4.02. Housing improvements shall also be deemed to include:
(a) all costs of architectural and engineering services in connection with the activities
described in Section 4.01;
(b) all administration, legal and consultant costs in connection with the Cedar Bluff
Housing Improvement Area; and
(c) costs of arranging financing for the Housing Improvements under the Housing
Improvement Act; and
(d) interest on the internal loan as described in Section 6.01.
Section 5. Housing horrovement Fee.
5.01. The City may, by resolution adopted in accordance with the petition, hearing and
notice procedures required under Section 428A.14 of the Act, impose a fee on the housing units
within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, at a rate, term or amount sufficient to produce
revenues required to provide the Housing Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "Housing
Improvement Fee'), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section.
5.02. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed upon each unit (120 units) within
CIC 358.
5.03. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed and payable for a period no greater
than 15 years after the first installment is due and payable.
5.04. Housing unit owners shall be permitted to prepay the Housing Improvement Fee in .
accordance with the terms specified in the resolution imposing the fee.
5.05. The Housing Improvement Fee shall not exceed the amount specified in the notice of
public hearing regarding the approval of such fee; provided, however, that the Housing
Improvement Fee may be reduced after approval of the resolution setting the Housing Improvement
Fee, in the manner specified in such resolution.
Section 6. Housing hnmovement Area Loan.
6.01. At any time after a contract with the Condominium Association for construction of all
or part of the Housing Improvements has been entered into or the work has been ordered, and the
period for prepayment of the Housing Improvement Fee has expired as described in Section 5.04
hereof, the Council may begin disbursement to the Condominium Association of the proceeds of an
internal loan (the "loan') of available City funds in the principal amounts necessary to finance the
cost of the Housing Improvements that have not been prepaid, together with administrative costs.
6.02. The City may refinance the loan or any unpaid portion of the loan at any time by
issuing bonds secured by Housing Improvement Fees, as outlined by Section 428A.16 of the Act
Section 7. Annual Repasts.
7.01. On October 31, 2007, and each year thereafter until there are no longer any
outstanding obligations in connection with the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, the
Condominium Association (and any successor in interest) shall submit to the City Clerk a copy of
the Condominium Association's audited financial statements.
7.02. The Condominium Association (and any successor in interest) shall also submit to the
City any other reports or information at the times and as required by any contract entered into
between that entity and the City.
Section 8. Notice of Right to File Obiedions
8.01. Within five days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Cleric is authorized and
directed to mail to the owner of each housing unit in the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area: a
summary of this ordinance; notice that owners subject to the proposed Housing Improvement Fee
have a right to veto this ordinance if ownersof at least 35 percent of the housing units within the
Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area file a written objection with the City Clerk before the
effective date of this ordinance; and notice that a copy of this ordinance is on file with the City
Clerk for public inspection.
Section 9. Amendment
9.01. This ordinance may be amended by the Council upon compliance with the public
hearing and notice requirements set forth in Section 428A.13 of the Act
3Z-
Section 10. Effective Date.
10.1. This ordinance shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof.
ATTEST:
By: Maria Petersen
Its: City Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
CITY OF EAGAN
City Council
By: Pat Geagan
Its: Mayor
m
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING A HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FEE
FOR THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING MPROVEMENT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Eagan ("City') is authorized under Mm. STAT. §§ 428A.11 -428A.21
(the "Housing Improvement Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within
which housing improvements are made or constructed and the costs of the improvements are
paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area
1.02. In accordance with the Housing Improvement Act, owners of at least 25% of the
housing units within Cedar Bluff Townhouse Condominium Association have filed a petition
with the City requesting a public hearing regarding imposition of the housing improvement fee
for the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area
1.03. The City Council of the City on October 3, 2006, conducted a public hearing duly
noticed in accordance with the Housing Improvement Act, including the adoption of this
resolution, at which all persons, including owner of the property within Cedar Bluff Housing
Improvement Area, were given an opportunity to be heard.
1.04. Prior to the date hereof:, the Cedar Bluff Homeowner's Association (the
"Association") had submitted to the City a financial plan prepared by an independent third party
acceptable to the City that provides for the Association to finance maintenance and operations of
the common area.
1.05. For purposes of this Resolution the terms "Housing Improvement Area" and
"Housing Improvements"have the meanings provided in Sections 3 and 4 of the Ordinance.
Section 2. Housing Improvement Fee Imposed
2.01. The City hereby imposes a fee on each housing unit within the Housing
Improvement Area (the "Housing Improvement Feel of the City legally described as Units 1
through 120, Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium (CIC 358), which Housing Improvement
Fee is imposed based on the total cost of the housing improvements to be financed by the
Housing Improvement Fee divided by the number of housing units.
2.02. The owner of any housing unit, which the Housing Improvement Fee is imposed,
may, at any time within 30 days after the effective date of this resolution, pay all or a portion of
the total 'Housing Improvement Fee imposed against such housing unit, any Housing
Improvement Fee (or a portion thereof) not prepaid in accordance with this Section shall be
payable solely in accordance with Section 2.03 hereof.
2.03. If not prepaid in accordance with Section 2.02 hereof, the Housing Improvement
Fee (or any unpaid portion thereof) shall be paid in equal annual installments over a period of 15
years, the first installment to be paid in calendar year 2007, which annual payment shall be
deemed to include interest on the unpaid Housing Improvement Fee from the date of this
Resolution at a rate of 5.5 percent per annum.
2.04. The Housing Improvement Fee, unless prepaid in accordance with Section 2.02
hereof, shall be payable at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and
collection of any ad valorem taxes. The Housing Improvement Fee imposed against each
housing unit shall. not exceed $660.45 per year, for a total 15 -year fee of $9,906.75
(or $6,368.44, if prepaid pursuant to Section 2.02).
Section 3. Notice of Right to File Obiections.
3.01 Within five days after the adoption of this Resolution, the City Clerk is authorized
and directed to mail to the owner of each housing unit in the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area a summary of this Resolution; notice that the owners subject to the Housing Improvement
Fee have a right to veto this Resolution if owners of at least 35 percent of the housing units
within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area file an objection with the City Clerk before
the effective date of this Resolution; and notice that a copy of the Ordinance is on file with the
City Clerk for public inspection.
Section 4. Effective Date.
4.01. This Resolution shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof.
Section 5. Filine of Housing Improvement Fee.
5.01. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution to be recorded on the
property tax list of Dakota County for the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Eagan this _ day of ,2006.
Pat Geagan, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of
'2006, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (the "City"), and CEDAR BLUFF TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Minnesota non-profit corporation, (the "Association"). (The City and
Association shall collectively be referred to hereinafter as the "Parties").
WHEREAS, the Association consists of 120 condominium units (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 428A, the requisite
percentage.of property owners within the Association filed a petition with the City Clerk to
request a public hearing concerning the establishment of a housing improvement area to allow
the Association to undertake housing improvements as defined herein; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted a public hearing and adopted an ordinance to establish
the Cedar Bluff housing improvement area; and
WHEREAS, the City will finance the housing improvements (as defined herein) and
create a housing improvement fee, provided that the Association enter into this Agreement.
NOW, WHEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and other good and
valuable consideration, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Housmo IMPROVEMENTS. The Association must undertake the following
housing improvements to the Property: window replacement and patio
door replacement for each unit and concrete and foundation repair (the
"Housing Improvements").
2. HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA LOAN. Within 30 days after the
Association has provided the City with a copy of the contract(s) for the
construction of Housing Improvements, the City shall disburse the sum of
$764,200.00 (the "Loan") to Dakota County Abstract and Title (the
"Escrow Agent").
DISBURSEMENTS FROM THE LOAN. The Association may obtain
disbursements of the Loan by the Escrow Agent for the Housing
Improvements and the following soft costs: Association's engineering
consultants; City administration fees; legal fees incurred by the City; fees
to be charged by the escrow agent; inspections and fees charged by Dakota
County Community Development Agency (hereinafter the "CDA");
payments to the City's financial advisors, Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
Disbursements shall be made only after the Association has submitted a
disbursement request to and the request has been approved by the CDA.
M
4.
Prior to the commencement of any phase of construction of the Housing.
Improvements, the Association must first coordinate a pre -construction
meeting with the CDA inspection staff and the Contractor. The CDA
inspection staff, Contractor and Association representative will review the
scope of work and final contract amounts, ensure that sufficient funds are
on deposit with the Escrow Agent to complete the Improvements and
establish a disbursement schedule whereby the CDA inspection staff will
inspect the work completed to date and recommend approval of draw
requests to the Escrow Agent. In addition, the CDA will approve all
change orders to the construction contracts and, prior to such approval,
shall determine that the Association has deposited sufficient funds with the
Escrow Agent to complete the work
REPRESENTATiONs BY ASSOCIATION. The Association makes the
following acknowledgments, representations and covenants:
A. The Association has legal authority and power to enter into this
Agreement.
B. The Association will obtain, in a timely manner, all required
permits, licenses and approvals, which must be obtained before the
housing improvements may be constructed
C. The Association will replace the windows and patio doors in each
and every condominium unit.
D. The Association has sufficient reserves to cover the cost of the
Housing Improvements that may be in excess of the Loan.
5. REOUIRED REPORTS. The Association shall, on or before the first day of
each month, provide the City with a report on the status of the Housing
Improvements to the Property.
6. COMPLETION OF HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS. The housing improvements
must be completed on or before August 31, 2007.
7. DEFAULT. Each of the following occurrences shall constitute an event of
default under this Agreement:
A. Association shall fail to perform any of the terms of
conditions to be kept or performed by the Association
under this Agreement;
B. Association shall fail to construct the Housing
Improvements on or before August 31, 2007;
C.. Failure by the Association to undertake the replacement of
windows and patio doors in each and every condominium
unit;
D. Failure to maintain an independent professional
management firm for the operation of the Association; and
E. Failure to deposit funds into the project fund sufficient to
complete the Housing Improvements as determined by the
CDA.
8. REMEDIES. In the event of a default by the Association, the City may, at the
City's option, request that the CDA coordinate completion of the work in default
and seek reimbursement from the Escrow Agent and from the Association for any
costs that exceed the amount of the Loan; or, the City may require that the Escrow
Agent disbursement any unused portions of the Loan to the City.
9.. NOTICES AND DEMANDS. Any notice required or permitted under this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when and if
sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, properly
addressed as follows, or such other address as may hereafter be designated
in writing by either of the Parties:
IF TO CITY: City of Eagan
Attn: Jon Hohenstein,
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
WITH A COPY TO: Robert B. Bauer, City Attorney
Severson, Sheldon, Dougherty & Molenda, P.A.
7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, MN 55124
IF TO
ASSOCIATION: Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium
Association, Inc.
Attn: Jeff Mahoney
Assistant Association Manager
Omega Management
15350 25th Ave. N. Suite 108
Plymouth, MN 55447-1991
10. LAw GOVERNING. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
CEDAR BLUFF TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, INC.
B �
s,
CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal
corporation
By:
Pat Geagan
Its: Mayor
By:
Maria Petersen
Its: Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �0day of p�`Cnd
2006, by DP t. J�SL APP, C'OL'-�LP— - , the PP$S (b, P C of CEDAR
'BLUFF TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Minnesota non-profit
corporation, on behalf of the non-profit corporation.
j- JEAN�TE ANN JOHNSON
NotPuGlla JOHNSO
YyCanuMamm� B�pHmdm 31.2m
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
[ 3�
FWRIM
�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2006, by Pat Geagan and Maria Petersen, the Mayor and Clerk of the CITY OF EAGAN, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
Notary Public
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
THE CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE CEDAR BLUFFS HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
and
APPROVING THE CEDAR BLUFFS HOUSING EUROVEMENT FEE
December, 2005 City receives Housing Improvement Area application for the Cedar Blu fs Association, including a
petition from at least 51% of the owners.
August 29, 2006 Association submits financial plan and completes application.
September 5, 2006 City Council meets at 6:30 pm. and calls for public hearing on the establishment of the Housing
Improvement Area
September 21, 2006 Notices are mailed to owners (at least 10 days prior to hearing).
September 22, 2006 Date of publication of hearing notice and map (at least 7 days prior to hearing). Publication furred to
Thisweek News on September 20,. 2006.
October 3, 2006 City Council holds public hearing at 630 p.m. on the establishment of the Housing Improvement
Area and approving the Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Fee. Following the public hearing,
City Council directs preparation of Ordinance establishing the Housing Improvement Area and the
development agreement.
By Oct 10, 2006 City and Association complete Development Agreement
-)ctober 17, 2006 City Council considers and adopts the Ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluffs Housing
Improvement Area effective on or after November 24, 2006. City Council approves resolution
establishing housiag improvement fee and approves Development Agreement.
October 18, 2006 City sends summary'of ordinance and resolutionand notice of owners' veto rights to each owner.
(Withm five days ofadoptmg ordinance and/or resolution).
By Nov. 16, 2006 Copy of Ordinance sent to the 1Vrmnesota Commissioner of Revenue (within 30 days of adoption).
By Nov. 30, 2006 City certifies housing improvement fee to Dakota County.
December 1, 2006 Housing Improvement Area becomes effective, if there are no owner vetoes or appeals.
December4, 2006 City cancels levy for housing improvement fee tf an appeal is fried
4`
Cedar Bluff Townhomes
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
FREERS
'8 AEEe C1A1 ES INC
Preliminary Estimates for Public Hearing Notices
City of Eagan
Housing Improvement
Project Costs
Concrete/Foundation
Mndows/Patio Doors
Consultant Fee
Contingently
Total Construction Costs
Finance Costs
Capitalized Interest
Soft Costs
Total Project Costs
Less Interest Earnings
HIA Loan Amount
Tenn (years)
Average Rate
Annual Debt Payment
Total Units
Cost/Unit - Annual
CosWnit- Monthly
Assessment - Per/Unit
Breakdown of Soft Costs
Association's Eng. Consultant
City Admin Fee
Legal Fees
Escrow Agent Service
Dakota County CDA Inspections
Financial Advisor
TOTAL
- Cedar Bluff Townhomes
$ 276,000
$ 417,000
in soft costs
$ 40,000
$ 733,000
J
34,900
$ 767,900
2 $ (31687)
$ 764,213
15
3 5.50%
4 $79,254
120
$660.45
$55.04
$ 6,368.44
I Assumes lees levied in 2006 for Initial collection in 2007.
2 Estimate - subject W change- will depend upon construction draws..
3 Estimate - subject W change.
4 Debt Payment is 105% of principal and Interest due. Assumes Wan closes 2-1-2007.
C EE:
Agenda Information Memo
Eagan City Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
October 17, 2006
o
ACTION TO BE
To authorize the preparation of short term lease agreement for Community Action Council — Armful of
Love Program at Cedarvale Mall and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
FACTS:
The City of Eagan purchased the Cedarvale Mall on September 1, 2006. A number of the
businesses in the mall have relocated to their new sites and space is vacant at the mall.
While the City does not intend to release the property for general use, it has received a request
from the Community Action Council to house its annual Armful of Love gift donation program in
one of the vacant spaces. The space would be required from late October through the Christmas
holiday.
At its meeting of October 3, 2006, the City Council authorized preparation of a short term lease .
for the former ISD 191 space at the Mall that would cover basic -costs and provide for liability
insurance by the CAC. Staff has determined that the primary additional costs will relate to the
provision of utilities for the property and, following discussions with the property manager and
prior tenant, determined that a monthly rent of $1,000 would be appropriate. This amount has
been discussed with CAC and they aro agreeable to this amount for the two month period from
October 20 to December 20, 2006
ATTACHMENTS:
Lease agreement on pages "I� through 4.
LEASE
This is a legal agreement ("Lease") between the Tenant and the Landlord to rent the
Premises described below. The word LANDLORD as used in this Lease means the EAGAN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the
"EDA'. The word TENANT as used in this Lease means COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL,
INC., a Minnesota non-profit corporation.
This Lease can be enforced in court against the Landlord or the Tenant if either one of
them does not comply with this Lease.
1. Description of Building. The building is located at property commonly known
as "Cedarvale Mall" (the "Properly') located at 3910 Sibley Memorial Highway in the City of
Eagan, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota (the "Premises"). The term "Premises" also
includes shared use of all common areas in the building and shared use of parking on the
Property.
2. Term of Lease. The term of this Lease is for two months commencing on
October 20, 2006, and ending on December 20, 2006, time being of the essence. Tenant may
terminate this Lease at any time earlier than the end of the term and shall not be liable for
payment of rent beyond the period of occupancy.
3. Rent.
a. Amount. The rent for the Premises is One Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($1,000.00) per month.
4. Acceptance/Quiet Enjoyment. Tenant accepts the condition of the Property and
Premises in an "as -is" condition. If Tenant complies with the provisions of this Lease, Tenant
may use the Premises for the term of this Lease.
5. Use of Premises. The Premises must be used only for Tenant's business and for
no other purpose.
6. Alterations/Removal of Personal Property from the Premises. Tenant may
not make any material alterations to the Premises absent the Landlord's written consent.
7. Damage to Premises. If the Premises is damaged or destroyed, Landlord may
terminate this Lease immediately and may decide not to rebuild the Premises. For purposes of
this paragraph, the' Premises is deemed damaged or destroyed if the Premises is damaged by
more than 25% as determined by the City's Building Inspector.
8. Utilities. Landlord shall pay for all utilities, including electric, gas, water,
etcetera for the Premises; Landlord will not provide phone service.
9. Insurance. Tenant shall, at Tenant's expense, procure liability and personal
property insurance for the term of the Lease listing Landlord as additional insured and
indemnifying Landlord from any claim relating to Tenant's tenancy of the Premises. The amount
of insurance coverage must be approved by Landlord prior to the commencement of the Lease
term. Such insurance shall be provided by an insurance company acceptable to Landlord.
10. , Right of Entry. Landlord and Landlord's agents may, upon prior written notice
to Tenant, enter the Premises at reasonable hours to inspect the Premises and perform any work
that Landlord decides is necessary.
11. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease, lease the
Premises to anyone else (sublet), sell this Lease or permit any other person to use the Premises
without the prior consent of the Landlord. If Tenant does, Landlord may terminate this Lease.
Any assignment or sublease made without Landlord's written consent will not be effective.
12. Termination. Tenant shall move out of the Premises when the Lease term ends.
Tenant may not renew the Lease, time being of the essence.
13. Surrender of Premises. When Tenant moves out, Tenant shall leave the
Premises in a "broom clean" condition and as it was when the Lease started.
14. - Abandonment. If Tenant moves out of the Premises before the end of this Lease
and Tenant fails to provide seven ('n days written notice to Landlord, Landlord may bring a legal
action to recover possession of the Premises. if Landlord recovers possession of the Premises
after Tenant moves out, then Landlord may consider Tenant's personal property in the Premises
to also have been abandoned. Landlord may then dispose of the personal property in any legal
manner.
15. Indemnification. Tenant shall indemnify and save harmless Landlord against all
liabilities, damages, claims, fines, penalties, costs and other expenses, which may be imposed
upon, incurred by or asserted against Landlord by reason of all of the following: (a) any use or
condition of the Property or in the building or any part thereof, (b) any personal injury or
property damage occurring on the Property or in the building; (c) any negligence on the part of
Tenant, its agents, contractors, licensees or invitees; (d) any failure to comply with any
requirement of any governmental authority; (e) any prosecution or defense of any suit or other
proceeding in discharging the building or any part thereof from any liens, judgments or
encumbrances created upon or against the same or against Tenam's leasehold estate; (f) any
proceedings in obtaining possession of the Premises after the termination of this Lease by
forfeiture or otherwise; (g) any litigation commenced by or against Tenant to which Landlord is
made a party without any fault on the part of Landlord; (h) any response costs, other damages
and expenses which may be imposed upon, incurred by or asserted against Landlord by reason of
the use, release, threatened release or disposal of Hazardous Wastes at the Premises; and (i) any
failure on the part of Tenant to perform or comply with any covenant or agreement required to be
performed or complied with by Tenant hereunder.
LII:
16. Default. If Tenant violates a term of this Lease and Landlord does not terminate
this Lease or evict Tenant, Landlord may still terminate this Lease and evict Tenant for any other
violation of this Lease.
17. Successors and Assigns. The terms of this Lease apply to the Tenant and
Landlord. The terms of this Lease also apply to any legal representatives and assigns of Tenant
or Landlord
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first written above..
LANDLORD:
EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal
corporation
By:
Pat Geagan
Its: President
By:
Thomas L. Hedges
Its: Executive Director
TENANT:
COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL, INC.,
a Minnesota non-profit corporation
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
. 2006, by Pat Geagan and Thomas L. Hedges, respectively the
President and Executive Director of the EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day. of
, 2006, by the of
COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL, INC., a Minnesota non -profit -corporation, on behalf of the
non-profit corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
'."TW- :7
SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A.
7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, MN 55124
(952)953-8847
(RBB: 206-23508)
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
N. APPROVE FINAL SUBDIVISION OF OLDRE ADDMON
This item has been removed from the agenda.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
O_ PROJECT 942, DEERWOOD DRIVE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Draft Feasibility Report for Project 942,
Deerwood Drive (Blackhawk Road to Pilot Knob Road — Street Improvements) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on November 21, 2006.
FACTS:
• A structural mill and overlay of Deerwood Drive, from Blackhawk Road to Pilot
Knob Road, in central Eagan is programmed for 2007 in the City of Eagan's 5 -Year
CIP (2007-2011).
On June 6, 2006 the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule for this proposed improvement.
An informational neighborhood meeting will be held with the adjacent property
owners prior to the formal public hearing to review and discuss the proposed
improvements.
• A draft of this Feasibility Report has been prepared and is being presented to the
Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for Tuesday, November
21, 2006.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
P. PROJECT 943, WESCOTT ROAD
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Draft Feasibility Report for Project 943
Wescott Road (Pilot Knob Road to Denmark Avenue — Street Improvements) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on November 21, 2006..
FACTS:
• A structural mill and overlay of Wescott Road, from Pilot Knob Road to Denmark
Avenue, in central Eagan is programmed for 2007 in the City of Eagan's 5 -Year CIP
(2007-2011).
• On June 6, 2006 the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule for this proposed improvement.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be held with the adjacent property
owners prior to a public hearing to review and discuss the proposed improvements.
• A draft of. this Feasibility Report has been prepared and is being presented to the
Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for Tuesday, November
21, 2006.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
51
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
Q. APPROVE PIN CLARIFICATIONS TO FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
CITY PROJECTS 926/ 927/ 932/ 933
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the clarification of the assessment roll
property identification numbers for City Project No.'s 926 (Saddlehorn/ Sunset/
Northview Meadows), 927 (Meadowland/ Suncliffe/ Beaver Dam Road) 932 (Whispering
Woods/ Slater Acres/ Slater Road), and 933 (Town Centre/ O'Leary Lane/ Golfview).
FACTS:
• City Projects 926, 927, 932, and 933 provided for the structural mill and overlay of
numerous various streets within the City.
• On September 5, 2006, the final assessment rolls were presented to the City Council
for each of the respective projects. All notices were published in the legal papers and
sent to all affected property owners informing them of the public hearings.
• On October 3, 2006, a public hearing held for each of the respective projects. Of the
1,064 parcels assessed under the projects, no objections were received. The City
Council approved the assessment rolls and authorized their certification to Dakota
County.
• Subsequent to the public hearings, City staff discovered that the assessment rolls
included with the Public Hearing Council packet did not display the entire property
identification number (PIN) for each parcel. The last 3 digits of the PIN numbers on
the Combined Assessment Roll were inadvertently truncated and were missing.
• All notifications to affected property owners included the full PIN's and provided the
legal notice required.
• This action authorizes City staff to clarify the assessment roll for each project by
revising the PIN's to include the full 10 -digit numbers for each assessed property for
proper recording at the County.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combined Assessment Rolls, City Projects
through,.
926/927/932/933, pages
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment .
Assessment
Variance
10-02500-023-27
Section 25
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-30590-010-01
Golden Meadow Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-30590.020-01
Golden Meadow Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-30590-030-01
Golden Meadow Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.31750-010-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1031750-020-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1031750-030-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-31750-040-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-41950010-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-41950-020-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041950.030-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041950-040-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041950-05001
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-010-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-020-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.28
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-030-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-040-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-050-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.44550010-01
Laurent 1st Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.44550020-01
Laurent 1 a Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010.01
Noithview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100010-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010-03
NorlNew, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010-05
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100010-06
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010-07
Norlhview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-01
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-03
Northview Meadows
$515.28
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-05
NorthviewMeadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100020-06
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
105210002007
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-5210003D-01
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Thursday, October
05, 2006
Page 1 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-52100-030-02
10-52100-030-03
1052100-030-05
1052100.030-06
10-52100-030-07
10-52100.040.01
10.52100.040-02
10521004)40-03
10.52100.040-05
10-521004)40-06
10-52100-040-07
10.52100-050-01
1052100-050-02
10.52100.050-03
10-52100-050-05
10.52100.050.06
10.52100-050-07
10.52100-060-01
10.52100-060-02
1052100.060-03
10.52100-060.04
10-52100.060-05
10.52100.060-07
1032100070-01
10.52100.070-02
10-521 DD -070-03
1032100.070-04
10.52100-070-05
.10.52100.070.07
10.52100.080-01
1052100-060-02
10.52100.060-03
1052100.060-04
10-52100-080-05
10P926
Addition Name
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northvsew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northviaw Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
NodNew Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows .
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NodNew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
NodNew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview.Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Proposed
Assessment
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.28
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
Pending
Assessment
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00.
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
Variance
$164.14
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006r-. r Page 2 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-52100-080-07
1052100.090-01
10.52100-090-02
1052100-090-04
10.52100.090-05
10.52100-090-07
10.52100.100-01
10.52100.100-02
10-52100.100-04
10-52100-10D-05
10.52100.100-07
1052100-110-01
1052100-110-02
10-521oD-110.04
10-52100-110-05
10.52100-11 D-07
10.52100.120-01
10.52700.120-02
1D-52100-120.04
10.52100.120-05
10.52100.120-07'
1 D-52100.130-01
10-52100.130-02
10-52100-130-04
10.52100-130-05
10.52100.130-07
10.5210D•14D-01
1 D-52100.140-02
10-52100.140-04
10-52100.140-05
10.52100.140-07
10-52100-150-01
10-52100.150-02
10.52100.150-04
10P926.
Addition Name
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northvlew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NorthviewMeadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Assessment
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
55
Pending
Assessment
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$880.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$880.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00.
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.OD
Variance
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74.
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
Page 3 ofIO
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10.52100-160-05
10-52100.150-07
10-52100.160-01
10-52100-160-02
10.52100-160.04
10.52100.160-05.
10.52100-160-07
10.52100.170-01
10-52100.170-02
10-52100.170-04
10-52100.170-05
10-52100.170-07
10.52100-180-01
10-52100.180-02
10.52100.180-04
10.52100.180-07
10-52100.190-01
10.52100.190-02
10-52100.190-04
10.52100.190-07
10.52100.200-01
10.52100.209-02
10-52100.200-04
10-62100.200-07
10.52100.210-01
10.52100.210-02
10.52100.210-04
10.52100-219-07
10.52100.220-01
10.52100.220-02
10.52100.220-04
10.52100.220-07
10.52100.230.01
10.52100.230-02
1OP926
Addition Name
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NorthviewMeadows
Northviaw, Meadows
Northviaw Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northviaw Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NoMMew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$65.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$595.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00 .
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26.
'$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
' $515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 4 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.52100-230-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-230-07
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-240-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.240.04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74'
1052100-250-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10.52100-250-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100.260.02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
- $164.74
10.52100-260-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-270-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100.270-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.280-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-280-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-290-02
Northview, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-290-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-300-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
i
10.52100-300-04
Northview, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.310-02.
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.310-04
Northview, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-320-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.320-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.330-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-330-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-340-02
Northview Meadows
_ $515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100340-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100350-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100350-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100360.02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100360-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-370-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100380-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100390-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-400-04
NorthviewMeadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100410-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.0D
$164.74
1052100420-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Thursday, Odober OS, 2006 Page S of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number IOP926
PID
Addition Name
10.52100430-04
Northview Meadows
10-52100.440-04
Northview Meadows
10-56210-010-01
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210-010-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-010-03
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-020-01
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-020-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-02003
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-030-01
Overview Estates Rapist
105621003002
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-030-03
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210040-01
Overview Estates Rapist '
10-56210.040-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-040-03
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210050-01
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-050-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210050-03
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210060-01
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210.060-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210060-03
Overview Estates Rapist
105621007001
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210070-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-070-03
Overview Estates Replat
1063400010-01
Revised Northview Meadows
10.63400020-01
Revised Northvlew, Meadows
1pb3400-03001
Revised Northview Meadows
10 -MO -010-02
Saddle Hom
1065800-010-03
Saddle Hom
10.65800-020-01
Saddle Hom
10.65800-020-03
Saddle*Hom
1065800.030-01
Saddle Hom
10.65800-030-02
Saddle Hom
10.6580003003
Saddle Hom
1065800-040-01
Saddle Hom
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
' $680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
'$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
5164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Page 6 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10.65800-040-02
10.65600-040-03
10-65800.050.01
1065800.050-02
10.65800050-03
10.65800.060-01
10.6580006002
10-65800060-03
10165800-070-01.
1065800070.02
10.65800080-02
10.65600-09002
10.85800.100-02
10.65800110-02
10.65800120-02
1072985-01001
1072985-010-02
10-72985-020-01
1072985.020-02
1072985-030-01
1072965-030-02
1072985.040-01
1072985.040-02
10-72985-05001
1072985-05002
1072966-060-01
1072985-060-02
1072995-070-01
1072985-070-02
1072986.010-01
1072986-020-01
1072986-03001
1072986-040.01
1072986.050-01
1OP926
Addition Name
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Hom
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset tat
Sunset tat
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset2nd
Sunset 2nd
Sunset2nd
Sunset 2nd
Sunset2nd
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Assessment
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26'
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
Pending
Assessment
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$600.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
Variance
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
Page 7 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
J Assessment
Assessment .
Variance
10-72988.060-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-070-01
Sunsel2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986.080-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-090-01
Sunsel2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-100-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72988-110-01
Sunsel2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-120-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72987-010-01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$880.00
$164.74
10-72987-020-01
.Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$660.00
'$164.74
10.72987-030-01
Sunset 3rd
$51526
$660.00
$164.74
10-72987-040.01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72987-050-01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
.$680.00
$164.74
10-729874060-01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-010-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1042988-010-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72968-01043
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-010-04
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-020-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-020.02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72968-020-03
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-020.04
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-030-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-030-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72988-030-03
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-03004
Sunset 4th
- $515.26
_ $680.00
$164.74
10.729884)40-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72988040-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-050-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-050-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72968-060-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72988-060-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-070-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-070-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-080-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
Thursday, October 05, 2006 � Page 8 of 10
(Y/V
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72988-080-02
10.72988-090-01
10-72988-090-02
10-729BB-100-01
10-72988.100-02
10.72988-110-02
10-72988-120-02
10-72988-130-02
10-72988-140-02
10-72988-150-02
10-72988-160-02
10-72991-010-01
10-72991-010-02
10-72991-020-01
10.72991-020-02
10-72991-030-01
10.72991-030-02
10.729914040-01
10-72991-04D-02
10-72991-050-01
10.72991-050-02
10-72992-010-01
1 D-72992-020-01
1 D-72994-010-01
10-72994-020-01
10-72984030-01
10-72994-04D-01
10-72996-010-01
10-72996-022-01
10-72996-023-01
1 D-72996-030-01
10-72996-040-01
10-72996-050-01
10-72997-010-01
1OP926
Addition Name
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th,
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 6th,
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 7th
Sunset 7th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 11th
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.0D
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
'$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00 -
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.OD
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$580.00
$164.74
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 9 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-72997-010-02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-020-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-020-02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00'
$164.74
10-72997-030-01
Sunset llth
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-729974030-02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-040-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-040-02
Sunset 111th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10.72997-050-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-050.02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00.
$164.74
10-72997-060-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-070-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72997-080-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-090-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-100-01
- Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.06
$164.74
10-72997-110-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-120-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-130-01
Sunset 11th
'$515.26
5680.00
$164.74
10-72997-140-01
Sunset 1lth
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74 .
10-72999-010-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72999.020-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72999-030-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72999-040-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26 -
$680.00
$164.74
10-74950-010-01
TEM
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.74950.020-01
TEM
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-74950-030-01
TEM
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Summary hu''SA_Nbe = 10P926 (330 d6la0 mcads)
Sum
$170,035.80
$224,400.00
$54,364.20
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 10 of 10
sem%
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP927
PID
Addition Name
10-02900-011.25
Section 29
10.48050-001-01
Meadowlands tsl
1048050-002-01
Meadowlands 1st
10-48050-003-01
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050-004-01
Meadowlands tat
10-08050-005-01
Meadowlands list
10-48050.ODS-01
Meadowlands 1st
1048050-007-01
Meadowlands tat
10.48050-006-01
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050-010-03
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050-180-03
Meadowlands tat
1048050-190-03
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050.200-03
Meadowlands 1st
1048050.210-03
Meadowlands 1st
1048050-220-03
Meadowlands 1st
144MSO-230-03
Meadowlands list
1042975.010-00
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-010.02
Sun CIH( tsl
10-72975-010-03
Sun ClI f tat
10-72975=0104)4
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975010.05
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-010-06
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975-011-01
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-012-01
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975020.02
Sun Cliff tat
10.72975020-03
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975-020.04
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-020-05
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-020.06
Sun Cliff tat
1D-72975-021-01
Sun CIHF tat
10-72975022-01
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-030-02
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975-030-03
Sun Cliff tat
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$3,160.92
$4,180.00
$1,019.08
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77.
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$10323
$386.77
$492.OD
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77'
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$2,881.36
$4,200.00
$1,318.64
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 1 of 10
(03
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
IOP927
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.72975-030-04
Sun CIBC 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-030-06
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-031-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-032-01
Sun CIN 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-040-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975.040-03
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-040-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975.041-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975.042-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-050-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-050-03
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-050-04
Sun CIBf list
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72976-051-01
Sun 'MIT lst
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975.052-01
Sun Cliff 1 st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-060.02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-060-04
Sun Cliff 1st.
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-061-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-062-01
Sun Cliff list
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-070-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-070-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-071-01
Sun Cltff 9st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-072-01
Sun Clt f 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-080-01
Sun CIHi 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-080-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-080-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-090-01
Sun MIT 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-080-02
Sun Cliff 1st
.$388.77
$492.00
$10323
10.72975090-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23.
10.72975100-01
Sun CTBT tst
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975100-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975100-04
Sun CIBf 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975110-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975110-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975110-04
Sun CIBi 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05,1006 / ' I Page 1 of 10
AlJ
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP927
Proposed
Fending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.7297&120.01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-120-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-120-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-7297&130-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
.$492.00
$103.23
10.72976-130-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-7297&130.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.7297&140-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
.147297&140-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-140-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472976-150-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-150-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-150-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-160-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
104206.160-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472976-160-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-170-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-170-02
Sun Cliff 1sl
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-170-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77 -
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-180-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-180-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-180.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
147297&190-01
Sun CIBF 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
147297519002
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-190-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-200-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-200-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-200.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.DD
$103.23
1072975-21001
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
107297&210-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$,103.23
107297&210.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-7297&220-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-220-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
107297&220-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
9072975-230-02
Sun Cliff 1sl
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 3 of 10
(05
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72975.230-04
10-72975240-02
10.72975240-04
10.72975250-04
10.72975260-04
10.72976-010-01
10.72976-010-02
10-72976-01D-03
1072976.010-06
10-72976.020-01
10-72976-020-02
1 D-72976-020-03
10.72976.020-04
10-72976-020-06
10-72976-030-01
10-72976-030-02
10.72976.030-03
10.72976-030-06
10-72976-040-01
10.72976.040-02
10.72976-040.03
10.72975040.06
10.72976-050-01
10-72976-050-02
10.72976.0513-03
10-72976-050-06
1072976-060-01
10.72975060-02
10-72976-060-03
10-72978.060-06
10-72976-070-01
10.72976-070-02
1072976-070-03
1072976-070-06
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun Clift 1st
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$358.77.
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
..$103.23
5388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
- $103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23.
. $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
5388,77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388,77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00 _
$103.23
$3811,77
$492.OD
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00.
$103.23
. $3118.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 4 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP927
PID
10-72976-080-01
10.72976-080-02
10.72976-080-03
10-72976-080.06
10.72976-090-01
10.72976.090-02
10-72976-090-03
10.72976-090-06
10-72976-100-01
10-72976-100-02
10-72976-100-03
10-72976-100-06
10-72976-110-01
10.72976-110-02
10-72976-11D-03
10.72976-110-06
10-72976-120-01
10.72976.120-02
1 D-72976.120-03
10-72976-120.06
10.72978-130-01
10.72976-130-03
10.72976-130-06
10-72976-14D-01
1D.72976-140-03
10.72976-140-06
10-72976-150-01
10-72976.150-03
10.72976-150.06
10-72976.160-01
10-72976.160-03
10-72976-160-06
10.72976-170-01
10-72976.170-03
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff tad
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Clift 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Proposed
Assessment
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00.
$492.00
$492.00
$492.OD
$492.00
$492.0D
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
Variance
$103.23
$103.23
.$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 5 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72976.170.06
10.72976-180-01
10.72976-180-03
10.72976-180-08
10.72976.190-01
10.72976-190-03
10.72976-190.06
10.72976.20D-01
10.7297&200-06
ID -72976-210-01
10-72976-210-06
10.72976-220-01
10.72976-220-06
1D-7297&230-01
10.72976-230-06
10-7297&240-06
1 D-72977-001-03
10-72977-002-03
10-72977-003-03
10-72977-004-03
10.72977-005-03
10.72977-006-03
10-72977-007-03
10-72977-008-03
1 D-72977-009-03
10.72977-010-03
10-72977-011-01
10-72977.011-03
1 D-72977-012-01
10.72977-012-03
10.72977-013-03
10-72977-014-03
10.72977-015-03
10.72977-016-03
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM aid
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM Sul
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Proposed
Assessment
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$368.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$386.77
$368.77
$366.77
$388.77
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$16.49
$388.77
$16.49
$388.77
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
,$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00,
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$492.00
$25.00
$492.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
Variance
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23'
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$103.23
$6.51
$103.23
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 6 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72977-017-03
10-72977-018-03
10.72977-019-03
10-72977-020-03
10.72977-027-01
10.72977-021-03
10.72977-022-01
10-72977-022-03
10.72977-023-03
10-72977-024-03
10-72977-02,5-03
1 D-72977-026-03
10-72977-027-03
10.72977-028-03
10.72977-029-03
10-72977-030-03
10.72977-031-01
10.72977-031-03'
10.72977-032-01
10-72977-032-03
10.72977-033-03
10.72977-034-03
10.72977-035-03
10-72977-03603
10.72977-037-03
10-72977-038-03
10.72977-039-03
10-72977-040-03
10.72977-041-01
10-72977-041-03
10.72977-042-01
10.72977-042-03
10-72977-04303
10-72977-044-03
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51.
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$386.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.OD
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
• $18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
.$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.OD
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18,49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
.$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.OD
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388,77
$492.00
$103.23
$18,49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18,49
$25.00
$6.51
Thursday, Odober OS, 2006 Page 7 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10.72977-046-03
10-72977-046-03
10-72977-047-03
10-72977-048-03
1D-72977-051-01
10-72977-052-01
10-72978-010-01
1 D-72978-010-02
10-72976-01 D-03
10-72978020-01
10-72978-020-02
10-72978-020-03
10.72978-030-01
10.72978-030-02 '
10-72978-030-03
10-72978.040-01
10-72978-040-02
10-72979040-03
10-72978-050-01
10.7297MSO-02
10.72976-050-03
10-72978-000-01
10.72978-060-02
10.72976.080-03
10-72978-070-02
.10-72978070-03
10-72976-080-02
10-72978-080-03
10.72978-090-02
10-72976-090-03
10-72978.100-02
10.72878.100-03
10-72976-110-02
10.72978.110-03
IOP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun CON 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIBf 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIBf 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Clfff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun MIT 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Clfff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIN 4th
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$16.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.OD
' $6.61.
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00,
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $386.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.97
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Oaobei 05, 2006 Page 8 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72978-120-02
10-72978-120-03
10-72978-130-02
10-72978-130-03
1 D-72978.140-02
10.72978-140-03
10-72978-150-02
10-72978-160-02
10-72978-170-02
10-72978-180-02
10-72979-010-01
1D -72979 -DID -02
10-72979-010-03
10-72979-020-01
10.72979-020-02
10-72979-020-03
10-72979-030-01
10.72979-030.02
1 D-72979.030-03
10-72979.040-01
10-72979-04002
1D-72979-040-03
10-72979-050-01
10-72979-050-02
1D-72979-050-03
1D-7297946"1
10 -72979 -ND -02
1 D-72979-060-03
1 D-72979.070-02
10.72979-070-03
10.72979-080-02
10-72979-080-03
10.72979.090-02
10-72979-090-03
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIO 4th
Sun CINE 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Thursday, Odober OS, 2006
i
Proposed
Assessment
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77 .
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77,
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$3B8.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
Variance
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$10323
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
Page 9 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP927
Proposed
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
10-72979.100-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979-100-03
Sun Cliff 5th
$368.77
10-72979-110-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
1042979-110-03
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
1D-72979-120-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.120-03
Sun Cliff.5th
$368.77
10-72979-130-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
1042979-130-03
Sun Clift 5th
$388.77
10.72979-140-02
Sun Cliff 5th
- $358.77
10-72979-14003
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.150-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.150-03
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10.72979-160-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.170-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$368.77
.10-72979-180-02
Sun Clift 5th
$388.77
Summery fw'SA_Nbr = 10P927 (320 dete0 records)
. Sum
8111,897.70
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.OD
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.DD
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
8142,420.00
[variance
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$703.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$30,522.30
Page 10 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
10P932
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
[variance
10-03100-012-25
Section 31
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10-03100-012-51
SeGion 31
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-03100-040-55
Section 31
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.12460-010-01
Awad Addition _
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.12450-020-01
Awad Addition
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-16725-010-01
Cedar Heights
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.16725-020-01
Cedar Heights
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-19875-010-01
Deer Rest Pond Addition
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-19875-020-01
Deer Rest Pond Addition
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-010-06'
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-020.06
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.DO
$75.21
10-53550-030.06
Oak Cliff
$551.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.53550.040.06
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.53550-050-04
Oak Cliff
$681.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-050-06
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550460.06
Oak Cliff
$681.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-070-00
Oak Cliff
$5,592.60
$5,450.00
($142.60)
10.53552-011-01
Oak Cliff 3rd
$6,352.62
$7,190.00
$637.38
10-53555-010-01
Oak Cliff 6th Addition
$2,595.54
$14,521.00
$11,925.46
10.53556.010-01
Oak Cliff 7th Addition
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10.53557-010-01
Oak Cliff 8th Addition
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10.53558-010-01
Oak Cliff 9th Addition
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10-53558-020-01
Oak Cliff 9th Addition
$4,459.74
$5,048.OD
$588.26
10-53575-010-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1D-53575-010-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.63575-010-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1D -53575 -01G -D4
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575-020-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-020-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-020-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1D-53575.020-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575-030-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.60
$13.44
10.53575-030-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
Page 1 of 5
Thursday, Orlober
05, 3006
73
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP932
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessmhttt .
Assessment
Variance
10-53575-030-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-030-04
Oak Cliff Pond -
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-040-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-040-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-040-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$1344
10-53575.040-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-05041
Oak Cuff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575450-02
Oak Cliff Pond
- $103.56
$117.00
$13.44
106367545043
Oak Cliff Pond
. $103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575450-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.DD
$13.44
10.5357546041
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.06042
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-06043
Oak CINE Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575460.04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.5357647041
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575470-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-63575-08041
Oak CIIff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576.080-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575-090-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
' 1453575-090-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.100-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.100-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-11041
Oak Clfff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.11044
Oak ClI f Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575.120-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-120.04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.66
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-130-01
Oak CINE Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053576.130-04
Oak Cliff Pond.
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-14041
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053576-150-01
Oak ClI f Pond -
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.160-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
.$13.44
1053575-170-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053576-01041
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-010-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 2 of 5
Q
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP932
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.53576-010-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576.010-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44.
111-53576-020-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-020-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-020-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-030-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103:56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-030-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-030-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13'44
10-53576-040-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-040-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-040-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.66
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576 -OW -02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-050-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-050-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$163.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-060-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
.. $117.00
$13.44
10-53576-060-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-070-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-070-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53578-0ti0-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-090-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
.$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576.100-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.58650.010-01
Prairie Oaks
$6,166.20
$6,979.00
$812.80
10.58660-020-01
Praide Oaks
$4,760.88
$5,388.00
$627.12
10-65870.010-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.65870-020.01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.65870-030-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-65870-040-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
1065870-050-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.65870-060-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.69200-010-00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-09200-020.00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.69200-030-00
Sisters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-69200.040.00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-09200-050-00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
Thursday, October 05, 2006
7:115
Page 3 of
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number IOP932
PID
Addition Name
10-09200.060-00
Slaters Acres
10-69200-090-00
Sisters Acres
1069200.100-00
Sisters Acres
10-692DD-110-00
Sisters Acres
1069200-120-00
Sisters Acres
1D-69200130-00
Slaters Acres
10-09200.140-00
Slaters Acres
10.69200150-00
Sisters Acres '
10.83568-010-01
Wentworth Park
10.83568-020-01
Wentworth Park
10.83568-03D-01
Wentworth Park
10-83568.040-01
Wentworth Park
10$3668-050-01
Wentworth Park
10.83566-06001
Wentworth Parc
10.83568-070-01
Wentworth Park
10-83950-01001
Whispering Woods
10-83950020-01
Whispering Woods
1083950-030-01
Whispering Woods
10-83950-041-01
Whispering Woods
10.83950-050-01
Whispering Woods
10-63950-060-01
Whispering Woods
1083950-070-01
Whispering Woods
10-83950.080-01
Whispering Woods
10.839504090-01
Whispering Woods
1D-83950100-01
Whispering Woods
1083951-010-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951-020-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951-030-01
Whispering Woods Second
1063951-040-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-050-01
Whispering Woods Second
1D-83951-060-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-070-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951.080-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-09001
Whispering Woods Second
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$580.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$7521
$581.79
$667.00
$75.21
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.DD
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00,
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$561.79
$657.00
$75.21
$561.79
$657.00
$75.21
Page 4 of
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP932
PID
Addition Name
10-83951-100-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951-110-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-120-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-130-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-140-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-150-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83952-010-01
Whispering Woods Third
10-83952-010-02
Whispering Woods Third
10.83952-020-01
Whispering Woods Third
10-83952-030-01
Whispering Woods Third
10-83955-010-01
Whispering Woods Sixth
10-83955-010-02
Whispering Woods Sixth
10.83955.031-00
Whispering Woods Sixth
10.83958-010-01
Whispering Woods Ninth
Summaryfor'SA_Nbr= 10P932(149dete0records)
Sum
$657.00
Thursday, Odober 05,1006
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$81,159.89
$102,448.00
$21,288.11
Page 5 of 5
V
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP933
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Variance
PID Addition NameAssessment
10-22477-010-01
Eagan Senior Housing Add
$8,464.00
$10,400.00
$1,936.00
to -22478-012-01
Eagan Senior Housing 2nd Addition
$7,633.51
$9,419.00
$1,785.49
10.28900-010-01
Gatewoods Addition
$10,850.59
$13,319.00
$2,466.41
10.28900-020-01
Gatewoods Addition
$4,317.66
$5,300.00
$982.34
10.72850-010-01
Stuarts First Carriage Green Apartm
$8,686.18
$10,673.00
$1,986.82
10-72851-010-01
Stuarts 2nd
$6,855.84
$8,424.00
$1,568.16
10-769OD-000.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-001-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.002-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-003-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-7690D-004-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$19'32
10-76900-005-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.006-03.
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-7690D.007-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
.$19'32
10.76900-008-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-009-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-010-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-011-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$18'32
10.7690D-012-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-013-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$19'32
10.76900-014.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.015-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.016-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-017-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769D0-018-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$19'32
10.76900.019-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-020-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-021-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-022-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$66.68
$106'00
$19'32
10.76900.023-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.024-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-025-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos .
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-026-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$108.00
$19.32
Page 1 oj8
77iursday, Odaber 05, 2006
I(J
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP933
Proposed
Pending
PID Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
variance
10-76900-027-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.028-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-029-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-030-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-031-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-032-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00 '
_ $19.32
10-76900-033-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$108.00
$19.32
10-78900-034-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-03503
Tomark Cordage HIVs Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1 D-76900.036-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-037-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-038-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-039-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1 D-76900.040-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900-041-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.042-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-043-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-769OD-044-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32.
10-769DD-045.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.046-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.047-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$108.00
$19.32
10-76900-048-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.OD
$19.32
10-76900.04943
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76gOD-050-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-051-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$88.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-052-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
10-76900-053-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769OD454-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-055-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900.056-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-769OD-057-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-058-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-059.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-060-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 2 of 8
77
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP933
PID Addition Name
10.76900-061-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D -76900-(M-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D-76900-063-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.06443
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-065-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-066-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-067-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
10-76900.066-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D-76900-069-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-070-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-071-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D•7690D-154-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.155-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-769DD456-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.157-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10.76900.158.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-159-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.160-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-161-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D-76900.162-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.163-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-164-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.165-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-166-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.167-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900468-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-169-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-170-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.171-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.172-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10-76900.173-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.174-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-175-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10-76900-176-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.DD
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.DD
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.01)
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.0D
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$1 MOD
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
• $66.66
$106.DD
$19.32
$86.66
$106.01)
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 3 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP933
PID Addition Name
10.76900.177-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
10.76904178-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904179-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904180-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1478904181-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904182-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904183-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76904184-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690418543
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904186-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904187-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690418&03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904189-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904190.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904191-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904192-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904193-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904194-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
1476904195.03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
1476904196-03
Tornark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904197-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690419843
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904199-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690420003
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904201-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904202-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476900-203-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904204-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904205-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904206-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904207-03
Tomark Coinage Hills Condos
1476904208-03
Tomark Carriage HMIs Condos
1476904209-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
1476904210-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.DD
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
• $86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
77rursday, Odober 05,1006 Page 4 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP933
Proposed
Pending
PID . Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-76900-211-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.212-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68.
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900.213-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.21403
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos.
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900-215-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.216-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32.
10.76900.217-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.218-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.219-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$.106.00
$19.32
10-76900.220-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.221-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.222-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.223-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$406.00
$19.32
10-76900-224-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.225-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$18.32
10.76900-309-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.310-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769D0.311-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.312-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-769DO-313-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.314-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.315-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769DD-316-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.317-03
Tomark Cardag4 Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-318-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
10-76900.319-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-78900.320-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.321-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-322-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.323-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.324-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900.325-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00 '
$19.32
10-76900-326-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.327-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 5 of 8
8Z
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 10P933
PID Addition Name
10-76904326-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.329-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.330-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-331-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.332-03
Tomark'Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-333-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
10.76900.334-03
Tomadr Carriage Hills Condos'
10.76900.336-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.336-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.337-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-338-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.339-03.
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-340-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.341-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.342-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.343-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.34403
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-34543 _
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.346-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-347-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10.76900.34843
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.349-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.350-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10.76900351-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900352-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-353-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.354-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.355-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.356-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.357-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-358-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.359-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.360-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.361-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Proposed Pending
Assessment Assessment
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$56.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.66
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.66
$106.00
$86.65
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$56.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68
$105.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68'
$106.DD
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
Variance
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$1.9.32
$19.32
$19.32
519.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32 .
$19.32
Page 6 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP933
Proposed
Pending
PID Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-76900.362-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.363-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-364-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86,68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.365-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-3%-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.367-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.366-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.369-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-370-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-371-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
' $86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.372-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.373-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.374-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
ID -7690D-37543
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-376-03 '
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-7690D-377-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.376-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.379-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.380-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.381-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-382-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-383-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.384-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.385-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-386-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$66.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-77051-01001
Town Centre 100 2nd
$4,501.09
$5,525.00
$1,023.91
1077051-020-01
Town Centre 100 2nd
$7,265.31
$7,290.00
$24.69
1077052-010-01
Town Centre 100 3rd
$6,983.59
$7,478.00
$494.41
1077054-010-01
Town Centre 100 5th Add
$2,549.78
$3,133.00
$583.22
1077054-020-01
Town Centre 100 5th Add
$2,232.38
$2,743.00
$510.62
1077()55-021-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$4,049.57
$4,997.00
$947.43
1077055-030-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$2,822.00
$3,462.0()
$660.00
10-77055-040-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$3,386.40
$4,170.00
$783.60
1077055-041-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$3,372.29
$4,170.00
$797.71
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 7 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP933
PID Addition Name
1047057-01D-01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Addkon
10-77057-020.01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon
10.77057-030-01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Addtion
10-77057-040-01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon
10.77056-010-01
Town Centre 100 9th Add
10.77059-010-01
Town Centre 100 loth Add
10.77059-011-01
Town Centre 100 1 Oth Add
10-77060010-01
Town Centre 100 11th Add
1077061-010-00
Town Centre 10012th Add
1077063.010-01
Town Centre 10014th Add
1077065-010-01
Town Centre 10016th Add
1077066-010-01
Town Centre 1 OD 17th Add
1077067-010-01
Town Centre 10018th Addition
1077067-02D-01
Town Centre 100 18th Addition
1077068010-01
Town Centre 100 19th Add
Summery tor'SA libe - 1OP933 (252 detail records)
Sam
$1,109.04
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$1,555.26
$1.911.OD
$355.74
'$2,105.42
$2,587.OD
$481.58
$2,031.36
$2,496.00
$464.64
$2,147.74
$2,639.00
$491.26
$3,174.75
$3,917.00
$742.25
. $3,666.60
$4,527.00
$858.40
$3,668.60
$4,527.00
$858.40
$1,425.11
$1,323.OD
($102.11)
$4,740.96
$5,850.00
$1,109.04
$1,411.00
$1,306.OD
($105.00)
$4,289.44
$5,293.00
$1,003.56
$5,517.01
$6,807.00
$1,289.99
$7,083.22
$8,740.00
$1,656.78
$2,977.21
$3,674.OD
$696.79
$4,726.85
$5,832.DD
$1,105.15
$153,735.68
$185,484.00
$31,748.32
Thursday, Odober 05,1006 Page 8 of 8
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PROJECT 930, SILVER BELL ROAD (PIICOLS TO KENNEBEC)
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 930
(Silver Bell Road - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota
County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 930 provided for the bituminous overlay of Silver Bell Road, from Nicols
Road to Kennebec Drive, in northwest Eagan.
• The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 26, 2006,
with a public hearing scheduled for October 17 to formally present the final costs
associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties.
• The final assessment cost is approximately equal to the estimated benefit amounts that
were presented at the original Public Hearing February 21, 2006.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property
.owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been
received to date. An informational meeting was held on October 12 to address all
property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of
interest. Of .the 64 parcels (10 Single -Family, 49 R4 High Density Residential, and 5
Commercial/ Industrial) being assessed, no one attended the meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, page through.
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES
Number: Project 930 Assessment: October 17, 2006
Name: Silver Bell Road (Nicola to Kennebec) Project Approval Date: February 21, 2006
Mill & Overlay
Final Feasibility
Rate Report Units
SANITARY SEWER
❑ Trunk
❑ Lateral
❑ Service
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
STORM SEWER
❑ Trunk
Final Feasibility
Rate Report Units
WATER
City
Assessed
STREET
❑ Truk
$66.290 F.R.
❑
Gravel Base
❑ Lateral
H
Surfacing/ Signs
High Density Res $11.32 $11.44 / F.F.
Single -Family Res $437.87 443 / Lot
Comm & Indust $15.07 $15.24 1 F.F.
❑ Service
❑
Multi Family Equiv.
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑
C/I Equiv.
❑ WAC
❑
Driveway
OTHER
❑ Service Pair
❑ Installation
❑ Energy Charge
Contract Number of Interest
Number Parcels Terms Rate
06=03 64 5 Years 5.50%
Amount
City
Assessed
Financed
$51.730 F.R.
$66.290 F.R.
$51,173.91
$57,007.09
(F.R = Feasibility Report)
OT"o
City of Eapn Me
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer
Date: October 10, 2006
Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 930
Silver Bell Road (Nicola Road to Kennebec Drive) - Street Overlay
At the public hearing on February 21, 2006, the City Council ordered Project 930, and in accordance with the feasibility
report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay, replacement of traffic and street signage, installation
of major intersection street lights, and replacement of curb and gutter for Silver Bell Road from Nicols Road to Kennebec
Drive, as needed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 500/6 of the cost for the street overlay and signage
improvements adjacent to low density/ single-family residential lots, 75% to high density residential properties, and 100% of
the cost adjacent to commercial/industrial properties, all in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy. The
improvements were completed under Contract 06-03. The following information was used in the preparation of the
assessment roll for Project 930.
L PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $71,757.92 paid to the contractor for the construction of the improvements and
the cost of the installation of traffic and street signage ($2,344.00) by City forces. The cost of installation of a major
intersection street light at Silver Bell Road and Nicols Road in the amount of $4,700 was paid to Xcel Energy. The cost of an
additional street light proposed in the feasibility report to be installed under this project at Silver Bell Road and Kennebec
Drive is now the responsibility of an adjacent development. Other project costs including engineering, design, contract
management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $28,379.08 were incurred resulting in
an improvement and project cost of $108,181.00. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule L These other
costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment
rate.
IMPROVEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
COST
OTHER COSTS
IMPROVEMENT
COST
FEASIBILITY
REPORT
Street Resurfacing/ Sign
Replace
$46,693.12
$18,878.82
$65,571.94
$66,280
Curb & Gutter Repair
27,408.80
10,500.26
37,909.06
42,190
Major Int. Street Light
$4,700
-0
$4,700
$9,550
Totals
$78,801.92
$29,379.08
$108,181.00
$118,020
If
11. ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment
roll.
B: STREET I1"ROVEMENTS
The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices
and quantities:
Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $65,571.94
C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES
The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of high-density residential, commercial and
offices. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as follows:
1.) Eleven residential equivalent properties within the project area are low-density residential with direct
driveway access to the improved street. 94 feet of residential property is not assessable as the property does
not take access to Silver Bell Road. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density residential
properties, based on a residential street equivalent (32/44) are computed as follows:
UNrr
EXTENDED
rrEM
UNrr
QTY
PRICE
COST
Mobilization
LS
1
$420.00
$420.00
Mill Bituminous Pavement
SY
3,086
1.40
4,320.40
Wearing Course Mixture
TON
884.47
38.91 '
34,414.73
Bit Material for Tack Coat
GAL
550
1.50
825.00
Adjust Water Valve Box - Riser
EA
2
75.00
150.00
Repair Gate Valve Top Sec
EA
1
143.00
143.00
Repair Gate Valve Mid Sec
EA
0
200.00
0.00
Adjust MT -I Frame & Casting
EA
1
295.00
295.00
Remove & Rep Frame & Casting
EA
1
530.00
530.00
4" Solid Line White - Epoxy
LF
0
0.19
0.00
4" Double Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy
LF
2,177
0.40
870.80
Traffic Control
LS
1
630.00
630.00
Traffic Signs
LS
1
2,344.00
2,344.00
SUBTOTAL
$46,693.12
Other costs @ 38.3%
$18,878.82
Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $65,571.94
C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES
The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of high-density residential, commercial and
offices. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as follows:
1.) Eleven residential equivalent properties within the project area are low-density residential with direct
driveway access to the improved street. 94 feet of residential property is not assessable as the property does
not take access to Silver Bell Road. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density residential
properties, based on a residential street equivalent (32/44) are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $65,571.94
Total Low -Density Residential Frontage w/ direct access = 878/ 4,351 (Total F.F.) = 20.2%
Total Improvement Cost (Low -Density) = $65,571.94 x 20.2% x 32/44 = $9,633.11
TOTAL EVIPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$9,633.11
11 Lots
$875.74/Lot
11VIPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$875.74/ Lot X 50% $437.87/Lot
2.)' Four high-density residential properties within the project area (Silver Bell/ Vogepohl Additions) have direct
driveway access to improved street. These parcels are proposed to be assessed based on their common
property's front footage adjacent to Silver Bell Road.The improvement and assessment rates for these
residential properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $65,571.94
Total High -Density Frontage =1,217/ 4,351 (Total F.F.) = 28%
Total Improvement Cost (High -Density) = $65,571.94 x 28% _ $18,360.14
TOTAL IWROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$18,360.14
1,217 F.F.
$15.09/ F.F.
IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$15.09/ F.F. X 75% $11.32/ F.F.
3. Five commercial/ industrial properties within the project area have direct driveway access to the improved
street. These properties are proposed to be assessed based on their front footage adjacent to Silver Bell
Road. The improvement and assessment rates for these properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $65,571.94
Total Frontage (Commercial/ Industrial) = 2,162/ 4,351 (Total F.F.) = 49.7%
Total Improvement Cost (Commercial/ Industrial) = $65,571.94 x 49.7% = $32,589.25
TOTAL EVIPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$32,589.25 2,162 F.F. $15.07/ F.F.
a
D. ASSESSMENT TERMS
The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance.
III CITY REVENUES/ RESPONSIBILITY
] MIPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
Street Resurfacing/ Signs $65,571.94
Curb & Gutter Repair 37,909.06
Major Int. Street Lights 4.700
Total $108,181.00 $51,173.91
FUND AMOUNT
Major Street Fund $52,307.09
Street Light Fund $4,700.00
Reviewed: m Reviewed:
- �— f
Public Works Departmento Finance D artrr
Dated Dated
c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Dougherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
CITY
>PONSIBIL]
$14,398.03
37,909.06
44
($57,007.09)
s:
W f
E
S
NO SCALE
LEGEND
— o ® Assessment Area
Street Improvements
( a p a M N Commercial / Industrial - $15.07/ F.F.
Low Density Residential ( R1.2.3) - $ 437.87/ Lot
960666600 High Density Residential( R4 ) - $11.32/ F.F.
Silver Bell Road
Street Overlay - City Project 930
bill Of EaQ81l
ng Department Final Assessment Map Z
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
IOP930
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Souse
Nbr Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
1001800-010-79
Section 18
2141
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800-021-79
Section 18
2135
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800-03079
Section 18
2131
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00.
$5.13
10-01800.04079
Section 18
2127
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800-07079
Section 18
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
1001800-08079
Section 18
2139
Slhrer Bell Rd
$437.87'
$443.00
$5.13
1001800-091-79
Section 18
2133
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800.10079
Section 18
2129
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01900-011-02
Section 19
$5,608.04
$5,669.00
$62.96
10-01900.04025
Section 19
$1,401.51
$1,417.OD
$15.49
1019600.010-01
Dallas Development
2020
Silver Bell Rd
$12,116.28
$12,253.00
$136.72
10-01400-010-01
Kennealy Addition
. 2115
Silver Bell Rd
$875.74
$886.00
$1026
10-6806001 D-01
Silver Bell
2091
Silver Bell Rd
$6,407.12
$6,475.00.
$67.88
10.68060-020-01
Silver Bell
2095
Silver Bell Rd
$2,399.84
$2,425.00
$25.16
10-71400-020.01
Spencer Addition
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
1075500.010.00
Tesseract Addition
$5,199.15
$5,258.00
$58.85
1075500-010-01
Tesseract Addition
3800
Tesseract PI
$8,258.36
$8,352.00
$93.64
10-82750-01001
Vogelpohl Addition
2099
Silver Ben Rd
$1,743.28
$1,762.00
$18.72
1082750101-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.85
$0.72
10-82750-102-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13.
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750103-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Ben Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750104.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-105-05
Vogelpohl Addition
-2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750106-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
Friday, October 13, 2006
g3
Page I of 3
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP930
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
House
Nbr Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-82750-107-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.111-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
1M2750-112-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-113-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-114-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-115-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-116-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.117-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-201-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750.202-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-203-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-204-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.205-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-206.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750.207-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-208-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-209-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-211-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.212-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750.213-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-214-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-215-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-216-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74.
10-82750-217-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-301-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.67
$0.74
Friday, October 13, 2006 Page 2 of 3
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number JOP930
PID
Addition Name
HouseNbr Street Name
10-82750-302-05 '
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-62750-303.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-304.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-305-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-308-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-307-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-308-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-309-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-310-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-311-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-312-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-313-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750.315-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-317-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-319-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
Summary for'SA Nbr' = 1OP930 (64 detail
records)
Sum
Friday, October 13, 2006
Proposed
Pending'
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13.
$70.87
$0.74
$51,174.13
$51,744.00
$569.87
95
Page 3 of
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. PROJECT 931, ART RAHN/ HILLANDALE
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 931
(Art Rahn/Hillandale Additions - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 931 provided for the bituminous overlay of the streets within the Art Rahn and
Hillandale Additions neighborhood, north of Diflley Road, east and, west of
Blackhawk Road. The streets included in the project were Kathryn Circle,
Meadowlark Road, and South Meadowlark Road.
• The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 26, 2006,
with a public hearing scheduled for October 17 to formally present the final costs
associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties.
• The final assessment cost is approximately 14% less than the estimated benefit
amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 20, 2005.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property
owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been
received to date. An informational meeting was held on October 12 to address all
property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of
interest. Of the 226 parcels (14 Single -Family and 212 Townhome Residential) being
assessed, no one attended the meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, pages through.
i
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES
Number: Project 931 Assessment: October 17, 2006
Name: Art Rahn/ Hillandale Additions Project Approval Date: December 20, 2005
Mill & Overlay
Final Feasibility
Final
Feasibility
Rate RBDOrt Units
Rate
Reuort Units
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
❑ Energy Charge
❑ Trunk
❑ Trunk
❑ Lateral
Contract Number of
Interest
❑ Service
Cit
Number Parcels
Terms Rete
❑ Lat. Benefittbunk
Financed
06=03 226
5 Years 5.50%
WATER
STREET
❑ Trunk
❑ Gravel Base
❑ Lateral
0 Surfacing/ Signs
Direct Access
Single Family
S435.70
506 / Lot
Townhouse
$102.01
$119 /Lot
❑ Service
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑ WAC
❑ Multi Family Equiv.
❑ C/1 Equiv.
❑ Driveway
OTHER
STREET LIGHTS
❑ Service Pau
❑ Installation
❑ Energy Charge
Contract Number of
Interest
Amount
Cit
Number Parcels
Terms Rete
Assessed
Financed
06=03 226
5 Years 5.50%
$32.300 F.R.
$91.580 F.R.
$27.726.30
$72,580.12
(F.R = Feasibility Report)
'T'
City of Eatan woo
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer
Date: October 10, 2006
Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 931
Art Rahn/ Hillandale Additions - Street Overlay
At the public hearing on December 20, 2005, the City Council ordered Project 931, and in accordance with the feasibility
report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage for
Meadowlark Road, South Meadowlark Road, and Kathryn Circle within the Art Rahn and Hillandale Additions, and
replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets as needed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 50% of
the street overlay and signage improvements in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy. The improvements
were completed under Contract 06-03. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll for
Project 931.
L PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $72,011.39 paid to the contractor for the construction of the improvements and
the cost of the installation of traffic and street signage ($3,190.66) by City forces. Other costs including engineering, design,
contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $28,295.03 were incurred
resulting in an improvement and project cost of $100,306.42. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule L
These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the
assessment rate.
CONSTRUCTION OTHER COSTS IMPROVEMENT FEASIBH.TTY
COST COST REPORT
Street Resurfacing/ Sign
Replace $39,810.21
Curb & Gutter Repair 32.201.18
Totals $72,01139
IL ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
$15,642.40 $55,452.61 $64,600
12.652.63 44.853.81 $59,280
$28,295.03 $100,306.42 $123,880
No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment
roll.
B. STREET 111APROVEMENTS
The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices
and quantities:
32' Wide Bituminous Street Overlay
Mill Bituminous Pavement
Wearing Course Mixture
Bituminous Mat for Tack Coat
Adjust MH Frame & Casting
Adjust MH Casting - Riser
Adjust Water Box - Riser
Traffic Control
Street Signage
SUBTOTAL
Other costs @ 39.29%
Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost
EXTENDED
LS
1
$ 200.00
$ 200.00
SY
3299
1.21
3,99139
TON
834.71
38.75
32,344.92
GAL
475
1.50
712.50
EA
3
295.00
885.00
EA
7
128.00
896.00
EA
2
75.00
150.00
LS
1
630.00
630.00
LS
1
3,190.66
3,190.66
$39,810.21
15,642.40
$55,452.61
C. EAPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES
The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of low-density single-family and townhouse/
condo residential. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as
follows:
1. 14 single-family residential properties within the project area (Art Rahn Addition) are low-density residential
with direct driveway access to improved streets. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density
residential properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $55,452.61
Total Single -Family Residential Frontage = 22%
Total Improvement Cost (Low -Density) = $55,452.61 x 22% = $12,199.57
TOTAL 11"ROVEMENT
COST
$12,199.57
IMPROVEMENT RATE
$871.40/ Lot
ASSESSABLE
UNITS
14 Lots
ASSESSABLE PORTION
X 50%
IMPROVEMENT RATE
$871.40/Lot
ASSESSMENT RATE
$435.70/Lot
2. 212 townhouse/ condominium residential properties within the project area (Hillandale Addition) are low-
density residential with direct driveway access.to improved streets. The improvement and assessment rates
for these residential properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $55,452.61
Total Residential Frontage= 78%
Total Improvement Cost (Low -Density) = $55,452.61 x 78% = $43,253.04
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$43,253.04
$204.02/ Lot
D. ASSESSMENT TERMS
212 Lots
ASSESSABLE PORTION
X 50%
$204.02/Lot
ASSESSMENT RATE
$102.01/Lot
The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance.
III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY)
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY)
Street Resurfacing/ Signs $55,452.61 $27,726.30 ($27,726.31)
Curb & Gutter Repair 44.853.81 44 853.81
Total $100,306.42 $27,726.30 ($72,580.12)
FUND AMOUNT
Major Street Fund $72,580.12
9�t,-- 01 (b — 10 - O�,
Russ Matthys, P.E.
Reviewed
Public Nforks Department
Dated
c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Dougherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
l0-(1 �(!
Dated
/01
N
W E
S
NO SCALE
J
T-f�
;C?�J
t (50) (36) CB
ME4DO LARD •
R AD c
(50) II•Ii� N. p,
Art Rahn / Hillandale Additions
City of Equ Assessment Map h
Engineering Department Project 931 'V�
of
Dt
Dt
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 10P931
PID
Addition Name
Souse Nbr
- &reet Name
10.11900-010-01
Art Rahn
1815
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-020-01
Art Rahn
1821
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-030-01
Art Rahn
1827
Kathryn Cir
10-11900.040-01
Art Rahn
1833
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-050-01
Art Rahn
1839
Kathryn Cir
10.11900-060-01
Art Rahn
1845
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-070-01
Art Rahn
1847
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-080-01
Art Rahn
1849
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-090-01
Art Rahn
1850
Kathryn Cir
10-11900.100-01
Art Rahn
1848
Kathryn Cir
• 10-11900-110-01
Art Rahn
1844.
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-120-01
ArtRehn.
1838
Kathryn Cir
10.11900-130-01
Art Rahn
1830
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-140-01
Art Rahn
1820
Kathryn Cir
10.32950-001-03
Hillandale #1
1764
Meadowlark Rd
10-32956-001-04
Hillandale #1
4070
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-002-03
Hillandale #1
1766
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-002.04
Hillandale #1
4072
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-003-03
Hillandale #1
1768
Meadowlark Rd
10.32950.003-04
Hillandale #1
4074
Meadowlark Lane
10-02950-004-03
Hillandale #1
1770
Meadowlark Rd
10.32950.004.04
Hillandale#1
4076
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-005-03
Hillandale #1
1772
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-005-04
Hillandale #1
4078
Meadowlark Lane
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
,$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 Page 1 of 9
I b�
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP931
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
1032950-006-03
Hillandale #1
1774
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-006-04
Hillandale #1
4080
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.007-03
Hillandale #1
1776
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01,
$0.00
1032950-007-04
Hillandale #1
4082
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-006-03
Hillandale #1
1776
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-006.04
Hillandale #1
4084
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10=32950-009-03
Hillandale #1
1780
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-009-04
Hillandale #1
4086
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950.010-03
Hillandale #1
1782
Meadowlark Rd
,$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-010-04
Hillandale #1
4088
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-011-03
Hillandale #1
4100
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
. $102.01
$0.00
1032950011-04
Hillandale #1
1755
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-012-03
Hillandale #1
4102
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-012-04
Hillandale #1
1757
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-013-03
Hillandale #1
4104
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
103295001304
Hillandale #1
1759
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-014-03
Hillandale #1
4106
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-014-04
Hillandale #1
1761
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950015-03
Hillandale #1
4108
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950015.04
Hillandale #1
1763
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-016-03
Hillandale #1
4110
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-016-04
Hillandale #1
1765
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-017-03
Hillandale #1
4112
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950017-04
Hillandale #1
1767
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-018.03
Hillandale #1
4114
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October l2, 2006 Page 1 of 9
I ��
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
10-32950-018.04
Hillandale #1
1769
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-019-03
Hillandale #1
4116
Meadowlark lane
10-32950-019-04
Hillandale #1
1771
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-020-03
Hillandale #1
4118
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-020.04
Hillandale #1
1773
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-021-03
Hillandale #1
4120
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-021-04
Hillandale #1
1758
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-022-03
Hillandale #1
4122
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-022-04
Hillandale #1
1760
MeadaMark Ct
10-32950.023-03
Hillandale #1
4124
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-023-04
Hillandale 01
1762
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-024-03
Hillandale #1
4126
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-024-04
Hillandale #1
1764
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-025-03
Hillandale #1
4128
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-025-04.
Hillandale #1
1766
Meadowlark Cl
1032950-026.03
Hillandale #1
4130
. Meadowlark Lane
1032950-026.04
Hillandale #1
1768
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-027-03
Hillandale #1
4132
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-027-04
Hillandale #1
1770
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-028-03
Hillandale #1
4134
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-028-04
Hillandale #1
1772
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-029.03
Hillandale #1
4136
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-029-04
Hillandale #1
1774
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-030-03
Hillandale #1
4138
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-030-04
Hillandale #1
1776
Meadowlark Ct
Proposed
Assessment
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$10201
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
Pending
Assessment
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01_
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
Variance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 1� Page 3 of
-
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
10P931
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
1032950-031-03
Hillandale #1
1744
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-031-04
Hillandale #1
. 4079
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950.032-03
Hillandale #1
1746
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-032.04
Hillandale #1
4081
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-033-03
Hillandale #1
1748
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-033-04
Hillandale #1
4083
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.034-03
Hillandale #1
1750
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-034-04
Hillandale #1
4085
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-035-03
Hillandale #1
1752
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-035-04
Hillandale #1
4087
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950.036-03
Hillandale #1
1754
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-036-04
Hillandale #1
. 4089
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-037-03
Hillandale #1
1756
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-037-04
Hillandale #1
4091
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-038-03
Hillandale #1
1758
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-038-04
Hillandale #1
4093
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-039-03
Hillandale #1
1760
MeadoMark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-039-04
Hillandale #1
4095
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-040-03
Hillandale #1
1762
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.040-04
Hillandale #1
4097
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-041-03
Hillandale #1
4100.
Skylark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$OA0
1032950-041.04
Hillandale #1
1735
Meadowlark Rd
.$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.042-03
Hillandale #1
4102
Skylark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-042-04
Hillandale #1
1737
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-043-03
Hillandale #1
4104
Skylark Lane
$102.01 -
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 Page 4 of 9
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number JOP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
10-32950-043-04
Hillandale #1
1739
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-044.03
Hillandale #1
4106
Skylark Lane
10-32950-044-04
Hillandale #1
1741
Meadowlark Rd
. 10-32950-045-03
Hillandale #1
4108
Skylark Lane
10-32950-045-04
Hillandale #1
1743
Meadowlark Rd
1032950-046-03
Hillandale #1
4110
Skylark Lane
1032950-046.04
Hillandale #1
1745
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-047-03
Hillandale #1
4112
Skylark Lane
10-32950-047-04
Hillandale #1
1747
Meadowlark Rd
1032950-048-03
Hillandale #1
4114
Skylark Lane
1032950-048-04
Hillandale #1
1749
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-049-03
Hillandale #1
4116
Skylark Lane
10-32950-049.04
Hillandale #1
1751
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-050-03
Hillandale #1
4118
Skylark Lane
1032950-050.04
Hillandale #1
1753
Meadowlark Rd
1032951-010-01
Hillandale #2
4186
Meadowlark Rd
10-32951-010-03
Hillandale #2
4176
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-010-04
Hillandale #2
4172
Meadowlark Way
1032951-010.05
Hillandale #2
4160
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-010.06
Hillandale #2
4152
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-010-07
Hillandale #2
4146
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-010-08
Hillandale #2
4122
Meadowlark Way
1032951-010-09
Hillandale #2
4126
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-020-01
Hillandale #2
4188
Meadowlark Rd
10.32951-020-02
Hillandale #2
4162
Meadowlark Rd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01 ,
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, Odober 12, 2006 I �� Page 5 of 9
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number IOP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
1032951-020-03
Hillandale #2 '
4174
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-04
Hillandale #2
4168
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-05
Hillandale #2
4158
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-020-06
Hillandale #2
4150
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-07
Hillandale #2
4144
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-08
Hillandale 02
4124
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020.09
Hillandale #2
4130
Meadowlark Way
1032951-030-01
Hillandale #2
4190
Meadowlark Rd
1032951-030-02
Hillandale #2
4180
Meadowlark Rd
1032951-030-03
Hillandale #2
4170
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-030-04
Hillandale #2
4164
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-030-05
Hillandale #2
4156
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-030-06
Hillandale #2
.4148
Meadowtark Way
10-32951-030-07
Hillandale #2
4142
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-030-08
Hillandale #2
4128
Meadowlark Way
1032951-030-09
Hillandale #2
4134
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-040-02 -
Hillandale #2
4178
Meadowlark Rd
103295'1-040-03
Hillandale #2
4166
Meadowlark Way.
10.32951-040.04
Hillandale #2
4162
Meadowlark Way
1032951-040-05
Hillandale #2
4154
Meadowlark Way
1032951-040-08
Hillandale #2
4132
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-040-09
Hillandale #2
4138
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-050-08
Hillandale #2
4136
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-050-09
Hillandale #2
4140
Meadowlark Way
10.32952-010-01
Hillandale #3
4133
Meadowlark Pt
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$10201
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 I Page 6 of 9
1�
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number JOP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
10-32952-010-02
Hillandale #3
4147
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-010-03
Hillandale #3
4143
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-010-04
Hillandale #3
4135
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-010-06
Hillandale #3
4118
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010-07
Hillandale #3
4102
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010.08
Hillandale #3
4100
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010.09
Hillandale #3
4074
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010-10
Hillandale #3
4082
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020-01
Hillandale 93
4129
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-020-02
Hillandale#3
4145
Meadowlark. Pt
10-32952-020-03
Hillandale #3
4141
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-020.04
Hillandale #3
4131
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-020-06
Hillandale #3
4116
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020-07
Hillandale #3
4104
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020-08
Hillandale #3
4098
Meadowlark Rd
10.32952-020-09
Hillandale #3
4076
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020.10
Hillandale #3
4084
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-030.01
Hillandale #3
4125
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-030-03
Hillandale #3
4139
Meadowlark Pt
10.32952-030-04
Hillandale #3
4127
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-030-06
Hillandale #3
4114
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-030-07
Hillandale #3
4106
Meadowlark Rd
1032952-030-08
Hillandale #3
4096
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-030.09
Hillandale #3
4078
Meadowlark Rd
1032952-030.10
Hillandale #3
4086
Meadowlark Rd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 Page 7 of 9
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
StreetName
10-32952-040-01
Hillandale #3
4121
Meadowlark Pt
10.32952-040-03
Hillandale #3
4137
Meadowlark Pt
10-329524040-04
Hillandale #3
4123
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-040-06
Hillandale #3
4112
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-040-07
Hillandale #3
4108
Meadowlark Rd
1032952.040-08
Hillandale #3
4094
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-040-09
Hillandale #3
4060
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-040-10
Hillandale #3
4088
Meadowlark Rd
1032952-050-04
• Hillandale #3
4119
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-050.07
Hillandale #3
4110
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-050-08
Hillandale #3
4092
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-060-04
Hillandale #3
4117
Meadowlark Pt
10.32952-060-08
Hillandale #3
4090
Meadowlark Rd
10.64300-009.04
River Bluff Town
4009
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-013-04
River Bluff Town
4013
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-017-04
River Bluff Town
4017
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-021-04
River Bluff Town
4021
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-025-04
River Bluff Town
4025
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-029.04
River Bluff Town
4029
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-033-04
River Bluff Town
4033
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-037-04
River Bluff Town
4037
• Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-041-04
River Bluff Town
4041
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-045.04
River Bluff Town
4045
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-049-04
River Bluff Town
4049
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-053.04
River Bluff Town
4053
Meadowlark Curve
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$10201
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$10201
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$10201
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 I Page 8 of 9
I�
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP931 Proposed Pending
Nb S N Assessment Assessment
PID
Aaa=vn Name
use r
trees ame
10-64300-055-04
River Bluff Town
4055
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-056-04
River Bluff Town
4056
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300.059-04
River Bluff Town
4059
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-060-04
River Bluff Town
4060
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-063-04
River Bluff Town
4063
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-064-04
River Bluff Town
4064
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-067-04
River Bluff Town
4067
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300.068-04
River Bluff Town
4068
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-071-04
River Bluff Town
4071
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-072-04
River Bluff Town
4072
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300.075.04
River Bluff Town
4075
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-076.04
River Bluff Town
4076
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-079-04
River Bluff Town
4079
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-080-04-
River Bluff Town
4080
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-083-04
River Bluff Town
4083 -
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-084-04
River Bluff Town
4064
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-087-04
River Bluff Town
4087
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-088-04
River Bluff Town
4086.
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-091-04
River Bluff Town
4091
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300.092-04
River Bluff Town
4092
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-095-04
River Bluff Town
4095
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-096-04
River Bluff Town
4096
Meadowlark Curve '
10.64300-099-04
River Bluff Town
4099
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-100-04
River Bluff Town
4100
Meadowlark Curve
Summary f0r'SA_Nbr' = 1OP931 (223 detail fecords)
Sum
$27,419.89
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$27,419.89 $0.00
Thursday, October 1$1006 Page 9 of 9
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council
VI. OLD BUSINESS
KIR
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve (or reject) the request for a Modification to the conditions of approval regarding
outside storage with the Conditional Use Permit approved for Best Brands on Lot 1, Block 1,
Best Brands rd Addition in the SE '/4 of Section 8.
FACTS:
➢ On June 4, 2002; the City approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage of
trailers on this site.
➢ One of the conditions of approval required that the storage lot be surfaced with
bituminous asphalt by November 1, 2007.
➢ Best Brands is requesting a three-year extension on the surfacing requirement to
November 1,2010.
➢ Since the 2002 CUP approval, Best Brands has expanded from three to 11 manufacturing
facilities through their acquisition of International Multifoods, Inc. As a result, Best
Brands is now reevaluating the allocation of funds for improvements to all 11 facilities,
including the Eagan facility.
➢ Pursuant to this extension request, City Engineering staff inspected the site on October
10, 2006 and found the existing surfacing material to be satisfactorily maintained, with
little rutting of the gravel and minimal amounts of sediment tracking onto adjacent paved
surfaces.
D A letter from the applicant is attached.
ISSUES: None
ATTACHMENTS (3):
Letter from applicant, page
Approved Site Plan, page 11 _
Conditions of Approval for 2002 CUP, pages through
aa Best Brands Corp.
_- Innovative Products and Service.
Bottom Line Results.
Date: 9/28/06 "."...I
To: Pam Dudziak _ City Planner (iI QCT
City of Eagan, Dakota County, MN
Best Brands, Corp., was issued a conditional use permit by the City of Eagan on June 4`�,
2002. Best Brands has complied with all the conditions set forth in this Conditional Use
Permit (CUP), except for Section J. which states the following:
Section J: The outside storage areas shall be surfaced with bituminous asphalt and include
concrete curb and gutter with required storm drainage provisions, by November 1, 2007 or upon
the extension of the building eastward, whichever occurs earlier."
Since this CUP 2002 was issued, Best Brands' business objectives have changed
significantly with regards to this area and the over all growth of our business. Best
Brands Corp. has made a determination that the extension of the main building eastward
will not take place on or before the November 151, 2007 deadline as stated above.
In March of 2006 Best Brands purchased International Multifoods, Inc. With this
purchase Best Brands organization grew from three manufacturing facilities to eleven
manufacturing facilities located throughout the United States and Canada. The
overwhelming business expansion has caused Best Brands to re-evaluate the allocation of
funds for improvements to all eleven facilities including the one in Eagan, MN.
Best Brands (Eagan's Manufacturing Facility) would like to ask for a 3 year extension to
the completion date stated in the 2002 CUP. This would allow Best Brands, Corp., to
adequately budget for these expensive modifications as outlined in the 2002 CUP. If
granted, Best Brands would by November 1, 2010 have completed the requirements listed
in Section J.
Thank You,
(Lxx
Darwin Schlinger
Plant Engineer, Eagan MN
Best Brands, Corp. 1 Ila 9129/2006
ELI DEN04 MS EXISTING
MALL PACK LIGHTING
DENOTES RE5CYCLEV
i 11
1�6ZTE: MA�,X�,Mbl= BITMIN-4.15 ORIVEKAY
607d2AILERS VAN
LIGHT POLE
MR
BE STORED IN/l . FHIY ------ —DENOTES PROPERTY
LIGHT POLE
Ole
—DENOTES BUILVINS
SETBAI-K LINE
d
IDEN07-S DRAINAGE AREA
.......... ....... DENOTES FVn)RE PROPOSAL
a
TO EXTEND CLASS V AREA
z
co
c
x 7 --DENOTES PENCE LINE
m
_j
(L
0
uj
OF TRAILER STORAGE
TOTAL AREA OF SITE. 7!iSKl SP,
F -
TOTAL AREA OF 1130`38 SF.
TRAILER STORAGE
TRAILERS TO BE Ftsw�w CI.A55
ASSUMED NORTH FROM WLIWN& PRIOR TO SEPT. I. 2002. V DRIVEWAY
% OF STORAGE VS.
TOTAL SITE AREA
ELI DEN04 MS EXISTING
DM40TES CtRpzw
WOODED AR NS)
MALL PACK LIGHTING
DENOTES RE5CYCLEV
VENOI—� 2 HEAD
1�6ZTE: MA�,X�,Mbl= BITMIN-4.15 ORIVEKAY
607d2AILERS VAN
LIGHT POLE
DENOTES OVERHEAD
BE STORED IN/l . FHIY ------ —DENOTES PROPERTY
LIGHT POLE
DENOTES HYDRANT
DM40TES CtRpzw
WOODED AR NS)
DENOTES RE5CYCLEV
1�6ZTE: MA�,X�,Mbl= BITMIN-4.15 ORIVEKAY
607d2AILERS VAN
BE STORED IN/l . FHIY ------ —DENOTES PROPERTY
ARE LINE
r=A,,,,,.
—DENOTES BUILVINS
SETBAI-K LINE
d
IDEN07-S DRAINAGE AREA
.......... ....... DENOTES FVn)RE PROPOSAL
a
TO EXTEND CLASS V AREA
z
co
c
x 7 --DENOTES PENCE LINE
m
—DENOTES BOL)NDRY LINE
0
OF TRAILER STORAGE
w 11
NaM, EXISTING ATTATCHED —DENOTES EXISTING,
TRAILERS TO BE Ftsw�w CI.A55
ASSUMED NORTH FROM WLIWN& PRIOR TO SEPT. I. 2002. V DRIVEWAY
AREA TO ALLOW DETAC!ED TRAILER
STORAGE
------------
SP -1
6[ 1 SITE PLAN T
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF EAGAN
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(des+Q�.�ds
�{�lt3Yl SSp�v�
WHEREAS, Best Brands has complied with all the requirements of the City of Eagan
necessary for obtaining a Conditional Use Permit.
NOW THEREFORE, By order of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, and subject to the terns and conditions hereof, a Conditional Use Permit is
authorized as follows:
1. Permitting a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage within the confines
of a "Limited Industrial' zone.
2. Said Conditional Use Permit shall apply to the following described property:
Lot 1, Block 1, Best Brands 2"d Addition
3. Said Conditional Use Permit shall run with the land as long as all conditional use
standards are met.
4. Said Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to conformance with the Eagan City
Code and with the conditions set forth herein to include, but not limited to:
5. . The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of
approval and proof provided to the City.
The CUP shall be continually subject to the following conditions:
A. The existing trailers attached to the building shall be removed and building
permits obtained for restoration of the building by September 1, 2002, to the
satisfaction of the Chief Building Official.
B. No more than 60 trailers shall be stored east of the building at any time, and
no more than 60 trailers shall be stored north of the building at any time. A
revised site plan showing where the individual trailers may be stored shall be
submitted prior to recording of the permit.
C. Concrete pads shall be installed to support the trailer legs in areas of proposed
trailer storage.
D. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed as shown on the Entrance Detail
plan dated May 1, 2002. The landscaping shall be completed by September
30, 2002.
115
E. All trailers must be stored in an orderly fashion.
F. A revised site plan indicating the storage area for the barrels and for materials
and equipment, showing where the trailers will be stored on the site shall be
submitted.
G. Outdoor material and equipment shall occur only in the area of the existing
concrete pad adjacent to the building and be used for such purpose only as
necessary for changing mechanical equipment within the building. Long term
outdoor storage of mechanical equipment and parts shall not be allowed
longer than 60 days.
H. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the City prior to the
construction of the proposed outdoor storage and parking areas. Detailed
plans for this grading work must be prepared and signed by a registered
professional engineer.
I. Recycled asphalt may be used to surface the east outdoor storage area. The
site will be subject to periodic review by city staff for adequacy of the material
to control dust and drainage. The first review will occur two years following
approval of this permit. If the material is determined to be inadequate, the
City will require that it be replaced with bituminous asphalt.
J. The outdoor storage areas shall be surfaced with bituminous asphalt and
including concrete curb and gutter with required storm drainage provisions, by
November 1, 2007 or upon extension of the building eastward, whichever
occurs earlier.
K. The outdoor storage areas shall not be surfaced with gravel base, Class V or
otherwise.
L. All parking and storage areas shall be property maintained to prevent
deterioration.
JCIv
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
NEW BUSINESS
A. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft Water Quality Management Plan
and authorize a 60 day public comment period beginning October 18, 2006, and closing
December 18, 2006.
FACTS:
• On August 1, 2005, the City Council authorized a contract with the firm of
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to update the comprehensive Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP). On September 20, 2005, the Council appointed
3 citizen representatives, 2 Council members, and one representative each from the
Advisory Planning and Advisory Parks and Recreation Commissions to the 13 -
member Water Quality Management Plan Task Force established to guide
development of the WQMP.
• The purpose of the Water Quality Management Plan is to provide for adequate
protection, preservation and enhancement of water bodies, wetlands and wildlife
habitat and to ensure the quality of lakes, wetlands, and streams meets or exceeds
regional, state, and federal requirements and community expectations.
• The City of Eagan adopted its first WQMP in 1990. In 1996, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency recognized Eagan's program as tops in the nation. Despite a 40 -
percent increase in population since 1990, water quality in the top seven recreational
lakes has stayed the same or improved. In a 2005 scientific survey of City residents,
99 percent said good water quality was very or somewhat important.
• Despite past successes, some lakes will not meet new water quality standards
mandated by state and federal regulations. To stay on top, the City must be able to
evaluate, include, and adapt to changing regional, state, and federal directives for
urban stormwater and wetlands management, in addition to public expectations.
• The objectives of the updated WQMP are to build on the successes of the 1990
WQMP; to consolidate and incorporate relevant policies, plans, and programs
instituted since 1990; and to position the City to address efficiently and effectively
the issues and needs of its surface water resources for the next IS years.
• The City Council is being presented a draft WQMP for acceptance and authorization
of a 2 -month public review from October 18 to December 18, 2006. A Public open
house has been scheduled for November 13, 2006, from 5:00 to 7:00_ p.m. in the
Eagan Room.
• A formal Public Hearing will be held in February, 2007, specifically addressing
wetland management strategies within the WQMP with.a formal decision to adopt or
modify the WQMP expected at the close of the hearing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Executive Summary, under separate cover.
I j�
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. WETLAND DELINEATION — MADELYN WOODS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive and Affirm the Wetland Delineation Report
for Madelyn Woods.
FACTS:
• Yiridian Ventures, LLC has applied for a Preliminary Subdivision (Madelyn Woods)
for the properties addressed as 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, in the NE '/4 of Section 32.
The developer is planning to create 8 single family lots on 6:7 acres.
• A wetland delineation report was submitted as part of the developer's application.
• Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules provide that the Local
Government Unit (LGU) is responsible for wetland -related decisions. The rules
allow decision authority to be placed with staff according to procedures established
by the LGU.
• On November 8, 2001, the City Council delegated the decision authority for
exemption, wetland type, wetland boundary, and no -loss determinations to the Water
Resources Coordinator while retaining approval authority for replacement and
wetland banking plans.
• Recent special interests and challenges to wetland -related decisions have resulted in
administrative procedures whereby all authorized staff decisions are formally
reviewed and affirmed by the City Council.
• A wetland delineation report dated August 2006 was submitted by Kjolhaug
Environmental Services Company, Inc. (Professional Wetland Scientist # 0000845)
for this site. The Water Resources Coordinator has field verified and confirmed the
delineation of one wetland. The wetland is not proposed to be impacted by draining,
filling or excavation.
• At its September 18, 2006 meeting, the Advisory Parks Commission recommended
approval of the wetlands delineation report. The report has been reviewed by the
Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Pictometry View, page114 _.
• City of Eagan wetland findings of fact, page 1
Ila
Project Name/#: 06091806
Phone #: 651.675.5300
Location of Project: — — N 32 27N 23W —
'/. '/. '/. Sec. Twp. Range Lot/Block
1. Type of determination requested (check those that apply):
Exemption (WCA Exemption # No -Loss
X Wetland Boundary and Type — Replacement Plan
2. Description of Wetland(s) with proposed impact:
a. Wetland Type (Circular 39) 1 (Cowardin) PEMA
b. Wetland Size UNKNOWN
c. Size of Proposed Impact (acres and square feet) N/A
3. Have sequencing requirements been met? Attach Sequencing Finding of Fact as supporting information.
❑ Yes ❑ No (if no, list why) N/A
4. Is the project consistent with the intent of the comprehensive local water plan and/or the watershed district plan, the
metropolitan surface water management plan and metropolitan groundwater management plan, and local comprehensive
plan and zoning ordinance? []Yes ❑ No (if no, list why) N/A
5. How will the project affect the following wetland functions: N/A
Functions Im t No Impact )move
Floodwater Storage —
Nutrient Assimilation —
Sediment Entrapment —
Groundwater Recharge —
Low Flow Augmentation —
Aesthetics/Recreation —
Shoreland Anchoring —
Wildlife Habitat —
Fisheries Habitat —
Rare Plant/Animal Habitat
Commercial Uses —
6. For replacement plan or no -loss determinations, are wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level?
❑ Yes ❑ No (if no, list why) N/A
7. Is approval of the activity proposed in item 1. recommended?
® Yes ❑ Yes, with Conditions ❑ No (if no, list why)
If no, why?
Delineation field verified and confirmed, and therefore determined to be acceptable. No wetland impacts proposed. Staff
determination recommended for formal review and affirmation.
8. SIGNATURE
LGU Representative (Dau)
Page 1 of 1 I / ► I
LGU findings of Fectdoc � �'�.J
(August 2005)
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting
C om/Ipjtlm mia
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight
single-family lots upon approximately 5 acres for property located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road
in the NE'/, of Section 32, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Council Members Present
FACES:
D The development site is located south of Cliff Road and west of Lenore Lane.
➢ It consists of two unplatted parcels and two outlots.. There are two -single-family homes
present, built in 1956 and 1965, and both are currently served by well and septic.
D Both existing homes are proposed to be removed with the new development.
➢ Access into the site is proposed from Lenore Lane via new public cul-de-sac Ellie Court;
existing driveway access to Cliff Road will be eliminated. Additional right-of-way for
Cliff Road will be dedicated with the plat.
D The development density is 1.6 units per acre. All of the proposed lots meet the
dimensional and size requirements of the R-1 zoning district.
➢ Approval of the wetland delineation report is required prior to subdivision approval. The
wetland delineation report appears separately on this Council agenda
➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 19, 2006 and is
recommending approval.
ISSUES:
➢ Neighbors at the public hearing stated concern with the street access and drainage.
120 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: December 14, 2006
ATTACHMENTS (2):
Draft APC minutes on pages121— 11'
Staff report on pages _through
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
September 19, 2006
Page 7 of 11
E. Madelyn Woods
Applicant Name:Viridian Ventures LLC
Location: 1810 & 1836 Cliff Road;
Application: Preliminary Subdivision
A Preliminary Subdivision of 6.70 acres to create 8 single family lots.
File Number: 32 -PS -15-08-06
Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff
report dated September 13, 2006. She noted the background and hi"i C..
Chuck Ryan, Viridian Ventures, LLC acknowledged the uniqueness�f the property and stated
efforts are being made to preserve the trees and woodlands.
Vice Chair Chavez opened the public hearing.
Connie Bailey, 1830 Karis Way stated concerns indEffing: preservation and damage to the oak
trees, wetland and drainage ponds including floodNEPanimal lifer and noise polls
Kay Elleraas, 4615 Lenore Lane stated concern for the Mi in traffic patterns," increase in
teenage drivers, and safety of children. _
Raj Maddali, 4637 Lenore Lane stated
the applicant being incorrect, driveway
and drainage.
Ms. Bailey discussed thE
discussed the direction)
Staff addressed the star
Glenn Huebngg-=: edluni
City Elgiber Russ Mail
City Plad Ridley clari
maintained;4aAtie City's
There being no mer p
the discussion bac-ft
The Advisory Planning=(
and the
the foilowitf name of the proposal and
acess to the pr�erty, right of way, grading,
1 durihg ire super storm in 2000. She
drainage and.access to the property.
and water quality management plan. .
be no impact to the wetland and the buffer will be
Vice Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned
discussed various access options along with drainage.
Member Keeley moved, Member Jensen seconded a motion to recommend approval of a
Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family lots upon 6.7 acres located at 1810 and
1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore Lane, in the NE'/. of Section 32 subject to
the following conditions as amended:
The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted
by Council on February 2,1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C4, D1, and E1
12ti
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
September 19, 2006
Page S of 11
2. The property shall be platted.
3. The developer shall prepare and submit a noise abatement plan lh accordance with
Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15, prior to final subdivision approval.
4. The applicant shall fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of thirty-six
(36) Category B trees (or an equivalent combination of Category A and/or Category C
trees).
5. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan prioeto Final Subdivision
approval that shows the correct placement of tree protection LeVdln.equlred to protect
the critical root zones of all preserved trees. Required Tre�l:ptective measures (i.e.
orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate.���etting), shall be installed
at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Rootxz5ne, 00--h—ever is greater, of
significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site. _
6. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry QjV1si
inspection at least five days prior to the issuaaGE c
compliance with the approved Tree Preservatlt
Protection Fencing.
7. All retaining walls shall be constru( outside the
pond/ wetland areas."
B. All erosion/ sediment control plans sl
be prepared by a designer who has I
Transportation (MNDEGOmining, or
Engineer in desigfll`ng s oT ro ater po
i to set up a pre-cosite
the gwding permit to and '
and utility easements for the
rand grading permits shall
da Department of
as determined by the City
9. All personnerreslMsible foRle installation vEoiosion/ sediment control devices, and the
establishment of vefMtio developr0 ht, shall have received Erosion/Sediment
Control tasgecfgr/Inst�erti#�tTgh the University of Minnesota, or approved
eauaLr1ffffiE�etermlr ed by the CitV—Enaineer.
10. _ . pion control meaams shalM5Mhstalled and maintained in accordance with City code
anUaagineering staaffiJs.
11. The proposed pipe dra mng to the easement area from the development shall be
extended Whe elevati55 of the existing 24 -inch pipe outlet elevation (—elevation 934.8).
12. On-site rate-conan ponding for the development shall provide storage to contain the 100 -
year storm everlt'with a rate of runoff equal to the current pre -development conditions.
13. Stormwater runoff shall be treated on site via one constructed pond. The design and
construction of the treatment ponds and infiltration basins shall satisfy City standards and
criteria. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for that portion of
the site that does not drain to the pond.
14. The wetland delineation report for the site shall be explicitly accepted as submitted.
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
September 19,2006
Page 9 of 1I
15. All existing well and septic systems on the site, if any, shall be abandoned in accordance
with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development.
16. This development shall dedicate public right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32) as
required by Dakota County.
17.
Plans have been corrected)
18. The entrance monument shall be eliminated or relocated. Alto—Ta an agreement
may be executed with the City that provides for location of tiMponument within the right-
of-way and its maintenance. _
19. This development shall be subject to a cash parks cul trails dedidWjo. on the six new
dwelling units. - —
A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion
12q
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 13, 2006
APPLICANT: Viridian Ventures
PROPERTY OWNER: Herb Baker
Dave Klein
REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision
LOCATION: 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road
CASE: 32 -PS -15-08-06
HEARING DATE: September 19, 2006
APPLICATION DATE: August 16, 2006
PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential
ZONING: R-1, Single -Family Residential
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family
lots upon 6.7 acres located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore
Lane, in the NE'/< of Section 32.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
Subdivision:
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission
and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type bf development or use
contemplated.
L5
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Pape 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgment of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds, or similar burden.
I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on
Solar Access).
That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standardsset forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and
filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality
Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other
information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down
herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as
fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the
public."
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The site consists of two unplatted parcels and two outlots. There is a single-family home on each
of the —2.5 acre parcels. The two outlots were created with the Ridgecliff 1" Addition
subdivision in 1980.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site is wooded and generally slopes to the north toward a wetland on the north -central part of
the site. There are two single-family homes on the property, the easterly home was constructed
l7�
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
in 1956 and the westerly in 1965. Both homes are currently served by well and septic. Both
homes currently have driveway access directly to Cliff Road.
The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the
subject property:
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Proposal — The proposed subdivision consists of consolidating four existing parcels into one
development site and subdividing the site into eight single-family lots. The existing wetland is
proposed to remain. Access is proposed from Lenore Lane via a new public cul-de-sac, Ellie
Court. The two existing homes will be removed and the existing driveway accesses to Cliff
Road will be closed. Dedication of additional right-of-way for Cliff Road is also proposed.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed single-family use is consistent with
surrounding development, which is also single-family. The surrounding area is also zoned R-1,
Single-family Residential.
Airport Noise Considerations — This site lies outside the airport noise policy zones.
Noise Abatement — The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan
prior to final subdivision approval. Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15 states "Where a plat is
located along a freeway, major arterial or other area which generates high volumes of
noise, the subdivider shall be required to prepare a plan to provide noise abatement. Said
plan shall provide for noise abatement through architectural site design, the construction
of earth berms, dense vegetation, walls, or the combination thereof or similar means
which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Such barriers shall be constructed in
accordance with PCA standards for the appropriate land use."
Dens i — The proposed eight lots on 4.96 acres (site area net of rights-of-way) results in a
density of 1.6 units per acre. This is consistent with the 0-4 units per acre identified in the LD,
Low Density residential land use designation.
6�i
Existing Use
Zoning
Land Use Designation
North
Cliff Road/ Single-family,
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
Residential
South
Single-family Residential
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
East
Lenore Lane/ Single-family
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
Residential
West
Single-family Residential
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Proposal — The proposed subdivision consists of consolidating four existing parcels into one
development site and subdividing the site into eight single-family lots. The existing wetland is
proposed to remain. Access is proposed from Lenore Lane via a new public cul-de-sac, Ellie
Court. The two existing homes will be removed and the existing driveway accesses to Cliff
Road will be closed. Dedication of additional right-of-way for Cliff Road is also proposed.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed single-family use is consistent with
surrounding development, which is also single-family. The surrounding area is also zoned R-1,
Single-family Residential.
Airport Noise Considerations — This site lies outside the airport noise policy zones.
Noise Abatement — The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan
prior to final subdivision approval. Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15 states "Where a plat is
located along a freeway, major arterial or other area which generates high volumes of
noise, the subdivider shall be required to prepare a plan to provide noise abatement. Said
plan shall provide for noise abatement through architectural site design, the construction
of earth berms, dense vegetation, walls, or the combination thereof or similar means
which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Such barriers shall be constructed in
accordance with PCA standards for the appropriate land use."
Dens i — The proposed eight lots on 4.96 acres (site area net of rights-of-way) results in a
density of 1.6 units per acre. This is consistent with the 0-4 units per acre identified in the LD,
Low Density residential land use designation.
6�i
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Paw 4
Lots — Minimum lot standards for the R -I zoning district require 12,000 sq. ft., 85 -foot width at
the front setback line, and 50 feet of frontage on a public street. All of the proposed lots appear
to meet these standards. The proposed lots range in size from 17,583 sq. ft. to 38,293 sq. ft. Lots
6, 7 and 8 will haves, 50 -foot structure setback adjacent to Cliff Road. Lots 6 and 7 are also
constrained by the wetland; the use of retaining walls in the rear yards of Lots 6 and 7 provides a-
20-30 foot gently sloped yard area between the structures and the retaining walls before the lots
drop off to the wetland and ponding areas.
Of the 6.7 -acre site, 1.74 acres is proposed to be dedicated as right-of-way for Cliff Road and the
proposed new cul-de-sac, Ellie Court. A small dedication (<200 s.f.) is also proposed for Lenore
Lane. The resulting net site area is 4.97 acres.
Tree Preservation — A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are two -
hundred forty-four (244) significant trees in the inventory. Individual tree size and species break
down is as follows:
Species Ave
Diameter
Dia. Ranee
Count
Percent of Total
Oak
20"
6"-36"
133
55%
Black Cheng
10"
6"-17"
36
15%
The balance of the tree inventory is comprised of a variety of deciduous trees, including species
such as elm, aspen, maple, crabapple, and cottonwood trees averaging 10" in diameter. There are
also a few, scattered conifer trees (spruce, pine, and fir) located on site.
The development as proposed will result in the removal of one -hundred five (105) of the two -
hundred forty-four (244) significant trees (43.0 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan
Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal
(single-phase, multiple -lot, single -unit residential) is set at 40% of the total significant trees.
With a proposed removal greater than the allowable amount, there is a required tree mitigation of
thirty-six (36) Category B trees.
The applicant has submitted a Tree Mitigation Plan that indicates the installation of fifty-four
(54) Category B trees to fulfill tree mitigation requirements.
Following discussions with the applicant's engineer, staff is recommending that the following
revisions be made to the Tree Preservation Plan. The applicant has indicated that they will
attempt to preserve certain trees (numbers 70, 181, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, and 218) that are
currently shown on the Tree Preservation Plan outside the proposed tree protection- fence area. A
revised Tree Preservation Plan should be submitted that shows the correct placement of required
tree protection fencing. Tree protection fencing should be adjusted on the Tree Preservation Plan
to more accurately reflect grading operations associated with the installation of utilities between
Lots 7 and 8, and Lots 1 and 2. Tree number 1 is located off-site, and therefore should be
removed from the counted tree inventory.
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Grading! TWoUNhy/ Erosion Control — The preliminary grading plan is acceptable with
modifications. The site is heavily wooded majority of the site slopes toward the north edge of the
site to a wetland near Cliff Road (County Road 32).
Grading for the proposed pond and house pads near the existing wetland will require retaining
walls (2'-6' high). These retaining walls should be constructed outside the drainage and utility
easements for the pond/ wetland areas.
A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan should be prepared in
accordance with current City standards and codes prior to final plat and planned development
approval. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits
should be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City
Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. Also, all personnel responsible for
the installation of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the
development, should have received Erosion/Sediment Control Inspector/Installer certification
through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City
Engineer. Erosion control measures should be installed and maintained in accordance with City
code and engineering standards.
Storm Drainage —The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable with modifications. A large
majority of the storm water runoff from the development is proposed to drain via public storm
sewer to a new storm water pond along the northwest comer of the development on Lot 6. The
pond will then flow to the existing wetland on the site (Pond BP -32.2 as designated by the City
Storm Water Management Plan). This wetland will then drain to an existing easement area
within Ridgecliffe 18` Addition, platted in 1980. This easement area has an existing 24 -inch pipe
outlet that provides for drainage to the east. The proposed pipe draining to the easement area
from the development should be extended to the elevation of the existing 24 -inch pipe outlet
elevation (—elevation 934.8). The on-site ponding for the development should provide storage to
contain the 100 -year storm event with a rate of runoff equal to the current pre -development
conditions.
Water Ouality — This proposed subdivision is in the upper end of the City's B -Watershed, which
contains Thomas and Blackhawk lakes. The developer proposes to address City stormwater
quality requirements partially by constructing one pond, which would pre -treat runoff from some
of the parcel before it drains to the onsite wetland. The remainder of the parcel that does not
drain to the treatment pond would be subject to water quality cash dedication.
Wetlands — A wetland delineation report for the project site (Kjolhaug Environmental Services
Company, Inc.; KES Project No. 2005-297) identifies one wetland that is subject to the City's
jurisdiction, according to the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Any proposals to
drain, fill, or excavate this wetland need to meet all provisions of WCA laws and rules.
� 19
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Page 6
The developer is not proposing to impact this wetland by any of these means. This wetland,
however, would be a "General Use" wetland within the proposed management classification
system of the Water Quality Management Plan that is now being drafted. This type of wetland
would receive the lowest protection regarding impact avoidance, buffer widths, and replacement
standards.
The developer is proposing to provide a 15 -foot setback from development structures (i.e.,
retaining wall). Both the wetland and stormwater pond would be included within a storm
drainage and utility easement provided to the City.
Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Existing sanitary sewer and water main of
sufficient size, depth and capacity is available within Lenore Lane to the east for connection and
extension by the development.
All existing well and septic systems on the site, if any, should be abandoned in accordance with
Dakota County and City standards as part of this development.
Streets/ Access — Public street access is proposed via new 480 -foot cul-de-sac, Ellie Court, which
will intersect with Lenore Lane about 100 feet south of Cliff Road. With 8 proposed homes, this
development is estimated to generate about 80 total vehicle trips per day (in/out). Public street
access is not available from Cliff Road (County Road 32) because of Dakota County's access
spacing guidelines and the availability of City street access to Lenore Lane.
Pedestrian access from the cul-de-sac will be provided with the construction of a public trail
from the intersection of Ellie Court and Lenore Lane to the existing trail along the south side of
Cliff Road.
Easements/ Permits/ Right -of- — The preliminary plat is not acceptable as submitted. The
Dakota County Plat Commission has reviewed this preliminary plat and has indicated that this
development is required to dedicate 100 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Cliff Road.
The preliminary plat does not show this dedication on proposed Lot 8, where an additional 25
feet of right-of-way is required to meet the County requirements. This development should
dedicate public right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32) as required by Dakota County.
This additional right-of-way dedication will create building setback issues for the house pad on
Lot 8 as proposed. Please see the "Setbacks" portion of this report.
Financial Obligation — At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for
platting.
Based upon a study by City staff of the financial obligations collected in the past and proposed
use for the property, the following estimated charges will be collected at time of final subdivision
or connection to the City's utility system. The final charges will be computed using the rates in
effect at time of connection or subdivision. The estimated financial obligation is subject to
15D
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Paae 7
change based upon the areas, dimensions and -land uses contained in the final subdivision or plat,
with due allowances for easements and right-of-way required with the plat.
Based upon a study by City staff of the financial obligations collected in the past and proposed
use for the property, the following estimated charges will be collected at time of final subdivision
or connection to the City's utility system. The final charges will be computed using the rates in
effect at time of connection or subdivision. The estimated financial obligation is subject to
change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final subdivision or plat,
with due allowances for easements and right-of-way required with the plat.
Improvement
Use
Rate
Ouanti
Amount
Sanitary Sewer Lateral
RI
$27.60/F.F.
109 F.F.
$3,008.40
Water Lateral
Rl
$27.85/ F.F.
350 F.F.
$9,747.50
Storm Sewer Trunk
Rl
$0.103/ S.F.
245,242 S.F.
$25,260.00
Total $38,015.90
Setbacks/Bulk Standards — This development is subject to R-1 zoning setbacks. R-1 minimum
setbacks are:
• Front yard (Cliff Road) — 50 feet
• Front yard (Lenore Lane /Ellie Court) — 30 feet
• Side yard (house) —10 feet
• Side yard (garage/accessory structure — 5 feet
• Rear yard —15 feet
• Building coverage cannot exceed 20% of the lot area
The site plan shows conceptual building footprints that satisfy these setback requirements. A
specific building plan for Lot 4 has been provided and also meets the R-1 setbacks. However,
with the dedication of right-of-way for Cliff Road required by the County, the conceptual house
on Lot 8 does not satisfy the required 50 foot setback. The resulting buildable area of Lot 8 is
significantly constrained and irregular in shape, making its viability questionable. The applicant
should provide a plan demonstrating that Lot 8 is buildable with the additional dedication of
right-of-way, or modify the subdivision to incorporate Lot 8 into adjacent Lot 7.
The Site Plan shows what appears to be an entrance monument south of Ellie Court at Lenore
Lane. This location is unacceptable as it is within the public right-of-way. The monument
should be eliminated or relocated. Alternatively, an agreement may be executed with the City to
provide for location of such a structure within the right-of-way and its maintenance.
Parks and Recreation — This development will be subject to a cash parks and trails dedication on
the six new dwelling units, payable at the time of final plat at the rates then in effect. The 2006
park dedication rate is $3,278 per lot/unit, and the trail dedication rate is $238 per lot/unit.
13�
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family
lots upon 6.7 acres located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore
Lane, in the NE '/4 of Section 32. There site contains two single-family homes and a wetland.
The proposed subdivision consists of subdividing the site into eight single-family lots. Access is
proposed from Lenore Lane via a new public cul-de-sac, Ellie Court. The two existing homes
will be removed and the existing driveway accesses to Cliff Road will be closed.
The proposed development is subject to R-1 zoning standards. The final plat will need to
dedicate additional right-of-way for Cliff Road as required by Dakota County. As a result, the
viability of Lot 8 is questionable given the setback constraints and lot shape. Because of the
proximity to a major arterial, CliffRoad,.the developer should provide a sound abatement plan
identifying how roadway noise will be mitigated for these new homes. The development is
subject to cash parks and trails dedications.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family lots upon
6.7 acres located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore Lane, in the
NE'/4 of Section 32. If approved, the following conditions should apply.
1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted
by Council on February 2,1993: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, Dl, and El
2. The property shall be platted.
3. The developer shall prepare and submit a noise abatement plan in accordance with
Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15, prior to final subdivision approval.
4. The applicant shall fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of thirty-
six (36) Category B trees (or an equivalent combination of Category A and/or Category C
trees).
5. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan prior to Final Subdivision
approval that shows the, correct placement of tree protection fencing required to protect
the critical root zones of all preserved trees. Required Tree Protective measures (i.e.
orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting), shall be installed
at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of
significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site.
1 371-�
Planning Report —Madelyn woods
September 19, 2006
Page 9
6. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division to set up a pre -construction site
inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure
compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree
Protection Fencing.
7. All retaining walls shall be constructed outside the drainage and utility easements for the
pond/ wetland areas.
8. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits shall
be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City
Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans.
9. All personnel responsible for the installation of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the
establishment of vegetation for the development, shall have received Erosion/Sediment
Control Inspector/Installer certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved
equal training as determined by the City Engineer.
10. Erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City code
and engineering standards.
11. The proposed pipe draining to the easement area from the development shall be extended
to the elevation of the existing 24 -inch pipe outlet elevation (elevation 934.8). .
12. On-site rate -control ponding for the development shall provide storage to contain the 100 -
year storm event with a rate of runoff equal to the current pre -development conditions.
13. Stormwater runoff shall be treated on site via one constructed pond. The design and
construction of the treatment ponds and infiltration basins shall satisfy City standards and
criteria. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for that portion of
the site that does not drain to the pond.
14. The wetland delineation report for the site shall be explicitly accepted as submitted.
15. All existing well and septic systems on the site, if any, shall be abandoned in accordance
with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development.
16. This development shall dedicate public right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32)
as required by Dakota County.
17. Prior to Final Subdivision approval, the applicant shall provide a plan demonstrating that
Lot 8 is buildable with the additional dedication of right-of-way for Cliff Road, or modify
the subdivision to incorporate Lot 8 into adjacent Lot 7.
in
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Pase 10
18. The entrance monument shall be eliminated or relocated. Alternatively, an agreement
may be executed with the City that provides for location of the monument within the
right-of-way and its maintenance.
19. This development shall be subject to a cash parks and trails dedication on the six new
dwelling units.
FAII
GALA%IE AVENUE
I �
r
----- r-----T-----T----_—T\
,eyggeBeCL•c
Le
-
Sr
ta
I
I,
W
C
R4.
_-x_
-----�'-- -------
PRELIM. PLAT
en
•, pi
e
M
A
0
rill
rL_
OUTLOT A
auo
I
LENORE LANE
-J
rw
LANE��aT4;
i 19 I
I v.
3
Ph
a
0
y
I �
r
,eyggeBeCL•c
Le
-
Sr
R4.
I^;
PRELIM. PLAT
3
Ph
a
0
y
------- 7--_—
GALA%IE AVENUE
I
>"------- _Tl--------------------
/
n
J
I %•:•
F I\
I II
�j
u
+• ;al./-\•_-! 1 � ''�r'`yy°�I,�' � I 1
III
C
-
III K
i
I
_
j I
L
II
Ire
II
I I
iN
II
r�
11a-3
I'
IIK
31461A,
11
GALA%IE AVENUE
I
>"------- _Tl--------------------
/
n
I %•:•
F I\
I II
�j
u
+• ;al./-\•_-! 1 � ''�r'`yy°�I,�' � I 1
III
C
-
III K
•�_ l I
l
Ire
`CA
GALA%IE AVENUE
I
>"------- _Tl--------------------
I
n
I %•:•
F I\
I II
�j
u
+• ;al./-\•_-! 1 � ''�r'`yy°�I,�' � I 1
III
C
-
III K
\\ i
I
Ilia
`CA
11a-3
I'
IIK
31461A,
11
w
N
/ 1
1 / tiL
4 LANE_-
l
/y
f/
I
Aluskm ons �.:, ,...r....
SnT PLAN
HEDLUND �'-=
HF
I www.v earaao annnn
wi m u-n�oe 1�) w° sw a xrw� w. ue w ion
W
— — _ — — _ _ _ — ` — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J
------------------------------------------------------
VIN
�
?I x =
E � I _ it
�
a
t
1
n
11
11
11
11
11
u
n
u
I 1. ♦ n
LANE
4
11 V
— t ! GRADING PLANJwAzrjf "DAY
I
GR.DING rr/r HEDLUND r''•':"""-'
�.-
I ' �
I 1. ♦ n
LANE
4
11 V
— t ! GRADING PLANJwAzrjf "DAY
I
GR.DING rr/r HEDLUND r''•':"""-'
�.-
------r------ri----.TI1"_'r--I—:
��' 11
yEDLUND
m nn as �'Y wwave
I
�T\
i I
10
r /r6 o J �'w l�'-• r i'
.u;>.It
11
�
l-4,. I .I •�'.
�/,•``•cL��ly `� ••`\.I
Iii
_�^
�'��' IJ'r.r\t�/ I I, l` :J y) ? I
;
�.�K�N. tvN •I � �I .Li..���lll
G
=� I
� � 'Sj--' 11-! - rr�� �,
� ♦ ...... ... #.. I
iii
�
�
�
� it
I i'a:. �
't 1f.
�•
�• rn
�c
It
I i ii
s► eft —s�+�i � • >t 'Ti+" � � ��������`q,
`� / - ala.. •Yr.', �, ~jhh.: / `' ... " `/ /f M
Jif
�
�.�� I i 11•i-" 1.11` It -+s i' •�� ;,r
1
LANE
I
1
W
1 �I Nw.u�il
F,ROSION CONTROL
I
ice/ L•��,i�
i I{jl
;M4A
:•I
an03lOA' CONTROL PLN
yEDLUND
m nn as �'Y wwave
I
;M4A
:•I
P
I
IM
------ -------------- ♦ ---------
- 7 s
I •' ull I
PI a,/:•I
J � 7 I\ � I ♦ � - � � I
I �J I
p
/ I
L. I / J II_ _ 4
L—I'
R a me •.�
Al I
4
:`rl
• z•ZS� 1 �` � `d
gM I' I
iia
a p...
M z i
cz
�D
07.1Zo .
UTILITY PLAN
SII 'J1:•�
II -
I
1
,I
i I .c•
i I iii
1
L /
r �
851f.•r LANE
E''IJ
IBLK S
c•
6.
I!I}IIIS I F1 'ff j.!•{0®stl. opal.•g Ei � O
��11�7'�I I �II I�3�Ii.{0®.a..fzl.•6 e.
fill
I If/D6L7T7 •ODDS �W YYI.-.r..4 ��..1
� a D77LIlYFIJN HEDLUND :�":�::�=�=Y i
µ r �—
•'•'�
I I �O
rl
-r•1 I •-ti.
I I A
L—I'
R a me •.�
Al I
4
:`rl
• z•ZS� 1 �` � `d
gM I' I
iia
a p...
M z i
cz
�D
07.1Zo .
UTILITY PLAN
SII 'J1:•�
II -
I
1
,I
i I .c•
i I iii
1
L /
r �
851f.•r LANE
E''IJ
IBLK S
c•
6.
I!I}IIIS I F1 'ff j.!•{0®stl. opal.•g Ei � O
��11�7'�I I �II I�3�Ii.{0®.a..fzl.•6 e.
fill
I If/D6L7T7 •ODDS �W YYI.-.r..4 ��..1
� a D77LIlYFIJN HEDLUND :�":�::�=�=Y i
µ r �—
� I
m.. i
II
/
L—I'
R a me •.�
Al I
4
:`rl
• z•ZS� 1 �` � `d
gM I' I
iia
a p...
M z i
cz
�D
07.1Zo .
UTILITY PLAN
SII 'J1:•�
II -
I
1
,I
i I .c•
i I iii
1
L /
r �
851f.•r LANE
E''IJ
IBLK S
c•
6.
I!I}IIIS I F1 'ff j.!•{0®stl. opal.•g Ei � O
��11�7'�I I �II I�3�Ii.{0®.a..fzl.•6 e.
fill
I If/D6L7T7 •ODDS �W YYI.-.r..4 ��..1
� a D77LIlYFIJN HEDLUND :�":�::�=�=Y i
µ r �—
- - ---.------------
;, ,.. -' e �� � -• - ' 11. %�: III i .-•
�1 J IP ♦ �I f I ry. �. ,Z�,'-'/r,.:
jn�.,`AI'
.�-I �,.. ��,\ � •!-'-� II,'' i • ;,;' ,. • / �;:.v4•'' ' I ._.iT f,:.. L_ .1 I, z I '•dc
_-7 I•. �_\ ' ,_; I�_ I _ Y�.' � .`, k..r...... moi.... _! ''1.J- III -I
-
as
1
.41
4'QN I Y 13.•. ) :g �'' IIIS
—1 -`� y; ._T � ..F.9 d moi, /II I , , .�' ��) �:.. IIS �11 � I^..IS•;[
A� ..'�'. , '.� 'i..7 I :III 1 i• I -,a
-Irl 11 ',�'�� �'t`� .�� a l:`�,: <6 r .11 II•L 1 .'�.-
/'(•_� /{• ,,Y n +.31>K:i?:Y6..i4 ; l�/ it
v `T.M w •� ��� � iii ',' I 1 I `�'\ i .
4,
4IC J,It
' 3 .; If )1, 'p T, .:' j;G •{" ' X i f I iii 1 — —
fj
/
fFy ?.
/..,,; /.,. r. /: Ya. e� Q.7 ..'. III 1 •I � ..
)q g • 4 a',',•bY' � •»�. 'III 1 I �:
ILI
- \ / ter•- ,`'+` A 1' j4' —'R�f \�.. 4<��,,ij ,� LANE' .
�..` i l 4-� l I W• j 1. a_ �„_ \..._ .:�•,• _'.. _ �✓'� ,
LI` 19LF:rrl cm
jIIII pp m
l0�1111 ������I���II•'�TI•{b®.o•oO:seep � � O
' w
RON m
+ i EXISTING CONDITIONSMAULM "US
Yasr"a QQNQIP s PLAP
HEDLUND �
I IM.I.W AIFLW � ♦• �W1�iWMW. � .M.�'6 WM!� W.IA. IC. IHII
------------- ---------------------------
neI Avian%IMII e
__---•(•—_—_ �T{---_-711._-.
pr 1 I s 1
444
71
,I
N Pc j.. i
', 8lnfudmt{Inlul¢I{Idlulddw.iu i�lnlp
fff d ............i»_..l.l»
........ ....
y�j nnnnnmXrlllndfamnldammlwrdrnn
$R1 wwnlrhllmunnmudmmm' dnma
� �� ft{{{8i�{I{tii9i(ltl{{fIR81{�{�+l�Igl{�II
1 .� ommmfain(ndnanlfuiwnwrtfunua
• .:. I.. ............. ..................
9 _. ....11._..1...1.....7 ..._I
.I....... ........ .:....... - ..........
:__._
TREE PRESERVATION . , _,....._:.._......
- IIIIIfrg111111191q.11glfla.glqldln1l 111:
MAMM
V I
I= fSZRVA "'L" HEDLU/I
w oar.. y�a�,)wawa�mwa
I n.9 o-nw01re r..'Pi4d11'In•w�'a100
AI
i3l.F: 2
1
loll
i 1 F• �
I� i tiyi7 1,
I 1 c -
t'
1
11 1 ,`�...•1• 1
i
r LANNE '
/ Il A ••�N
+~�It IF F• •�
t:7 ffjlCt
1puunalinlld.il.{uuu*li.lu.d.gle.dl�a✓,1 m
:L::::.::i,.l...r.-Ff•IIIP'IJ.I..YITj.X T•�•?( i�1!
p.....«...z...i..i.:......... e.:..:..i.::.:...... lf
I�Imnnnnnmrngnnuml�Ilmnlhdr 1. ndlw{ a.'� `�
IAnl:nnl4.nnmrdnnrdr�.gn14. %nNINr1!Iwl ` y9
qln;nnl(it{:Nfll�i{9iiilii�nj�;i`{fl" ri
Idmnnl.mumnmmndrduuiauunuuaral s' yy®��
dN......•......n'............-.............. �i
-----------------------
----------- �� ------------
I !: 1I1
_ 'G ' %��' : 1 .'fi'':: r� ('Sud • i.,S...m.
iI r-•._'. _.�,..• ter. _ _ -
Af
TREE MITIGATION jw
1
p 1 11
it t-7
I 1 i
I %r) SLK 2
LANE
r=t
,C• t- ?:
I :r.
Ph
N
g � y
rxss ,mf:1f90N PlAf! HEDLU/VD m.-.. �" - -
I �.: ••• -gym W�
�`.il
III
m
lid
TREE MITIGATION jw
1
p 1 11
it t-7
I 1 i
I %r) SLK 2
LANE
r=t
,C• t- ?:
I :r.
Ph
N
g � y
rxss ,mf:1f90N PlAf! HEDLU/VD m.-.. �" - -
I �.: ••• -gym W�
Project Description for Proposed Madelyn Woods
We are proposing to adjoin the two properties located at 1810 Cliff
Road and 1836 Cliff Road. Combined these properties are six plus
acres.. The two existing properties currently have driveways that
access directly to Cliff Road from the south.
We are proposing to subdivide these adjoined properties into a
Development of eight single family lots in a Cul-de-sac design.
The new street would enter from the west side of Lenore Lane
(Located to the east of the Project) and proceed westerly into the
new proposed Cul-de-sac. .
The two existing homes will be removed and the existing
driveways will no longer enter from Cliff Road.
We understand that the zoning would likely allow more than eight
lots. We chose to subdivide into only eight lots in order to best
preserve the natural setting of trees. We intend to market this
project as an upscale neighborhood.
R'Ce�ved S-l�ue
1�5
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
D. LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) — CITY OF EAGAN
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To adopt a Negative Declaration on the need for a Lone Oak Business Campus
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 85 acre property located north of Lone
Oak Road and west of Inver Grove Heights in the SE'/e of Section 1.
FACTS:
➢ The scope of the Lone Business Campus proposal attains the threshold for a
mandatory EAW.
➢ The property owner, Scenic Enterprises, prepared the bulk of a draft EAW (SRF
Consulting Group prepared the traffic analysis) for review by City staff and the
City's consultant, SRF Consulting Group. The draft EAW was submitted to the
Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on September November 1, 2004.
➢ The EQB published the EAW Availability Notice in the EQB Monitor on
September 11, 2006, initiating the 30 day Comment Period. The EAW Comment
Period ended October 11, 2006.
➢ Comments were received from Dakota County, the DNR, MnDOT, MPCA and
the Met Council. The Findings of Fact state and respond to the four factors to be
considered under Minnesota rules to determine the adequacy of an EAW/need for
an EIS. Based on all available information, City staff and the City's consultant,
SRF, believe an EIS is not warranted for this project.
➢ The EAW Response Package includes an introduction, Findings of Fact,
responses to comments made and the comment letters received.
➢ Some comments were not received until late Thursday, staff will complete the
review of the comments and prepare responses for the Response Package that will
be delivered to the City Council on Monday with Additional Information.
ATTACHMENTS: (1)
The EAW Response package will be distributed on Monday (10/16/06).
lqfo
• ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 179 2006
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
• DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .
Item 1. Redevelopment District Update
Item 2. Development/Construction Activity
149
•
City of Wan Ycno
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2006
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA / OCTOBER 17, 2006 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Council reserves the right to schedule an Executive Session for matters of pending or
threatened litigation or matters of union negotiations or certain labor matters. There is no Executive
Session to be scheduled at this time.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
There are no items at this time.
is DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
There are no items at this time.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Item 1. Redevelopment District Update — Staff is providing regular updates to the City Council
regarding the City's redevelopment districts as a part of each administrative agenda In addition to
the information enclosed ori pages through Lct& staff will be available to provide
comments or respond to questions relative to the redevelopment projects at Tuesday's meeting.
Item 2. Development/Construction Activity — Per the Council's request, Community
Development staff will provide bi-weekly updates of larger development and construction activity.
The current update is enclosed on page(.
• /s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
/4
•
Citi of Wan �eoo
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2006
SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITY UPDATE
The following update reflects activity in the City's redevelopment districts.
Cedar Grove Redevelopment District
• Cedarvale Mall Acquisition - The City took possessionof the mall on September 1, 2006.
Staff continues to work with remaining mall tenants on relocation planning and assistance.
• First Phase Development Plans — The EDA has approved a three month extension of deadlines
for submission of Phase I concept plans, development applications, notification of intent to
proceed and their purchase of the mall property. Staff will update the Council in late October
regarding the status of resubmittals and plan to present information in that regard to the Council
in November.
• Silver Bell Center Remodeling — The building permits have been issued to permit the
improvements for the relocation of the Cedarvale Barbers, Mike's Shoe Repair, Cedarvale
Tailors and Burton's Frame Shop to Silver Bell Center. Mike's and Cedarvale Tailors have •
moved and Cedarvale Barbers and Burtons are expected to move in November.
• Acquisition and Relocation Plans — Staff has received an appraisal from Ellingson and
Associates and is continuing negotiations for that acquisition. The City is waiting for an
appraisal from Steve Martin, owner of the former Mr. Steak property. Staff has also discussed
possible acquisition with the owners of the Sinclair Station and Kelly Plourde Sales. Several
other property owners are actively seeking new sites for their businesses.
• Communications Activities — The Cedar Grove Gateway, the monthly newsletter update, is
being distributed to businesses in the area. Website updates also continue.
• Transit Update -
Northeast Eagan Redevelopment District
• McGough Office Project — The City Attorney's office has had appraisals of the four
remaining properties in the Blue. Gentian area prepared and has forwarded offers to the
owners for consideration of negotiated acquisition in advance of an eminent domain action.
• Hwy 55 Parcels — DART has submitted a draft concept plan and preliminary application for
financing assistance to begin the staff process of reviewing a possible formal proposal for
consideration by the City Council and EDA. A project must be pursued in the next nine
months before the five year rule is reached.
• Grand Oaks Development — Constriction is complete on first office building, retail center
and bank building. Construction is also underway on the Grand Oak 11 office building on the
former site of the TMI building.
• TMI Relocation Assistance Appeal — The hearing officer has held a conference call with
TMI and City representatives and has communicated expectations for a presentation of claims
and a hearing in January or February of 2007. •
mil
• Southeast Ear -an Renovation and Renewal District
• The City Council approved the resolutions authorizing the creation of the district on June 20.
Staff has scheduled negotiations of a development agreement with Revestors relative to
assistance with extraordinary costs associated with the first phase of the Red Pine Crossing
development.
11
General Redevelopment
• Impact of Eminent Domain Legislation on Redevelopment Districts — In consideration of the
2006 law changes, staff, Ehlers and Associates and the City Attorney will develop a property
acquisition plan for the two Eagan Redevelopment Districts that were in place prior to February
1, 2006. Acquisition must occur within five years of the certification of the district, which will
be August 8, 2007 in the case of the Northeast Eagan District and July 22, 2008 in the case of the
Cedar Grove District
/SD
0
City of Eapn 116
TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Director
FROM: Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official
Mike Ridley, City Planner
DATE: October 9, 2006
SUBJECT: Development/Construction Activity Update
The following update reflects recent activity in the Building and Planning Divisions.
Permits Issued
Address Business Name/TV Valuation Type
2864 Hwy 55 Time Out Restaurant 480,000 Comm Impr
1980 Seneca Rd Freightmasters 100,000 Comm Impr •
Development Update
➢ A staff person each from Planning, Parks and Engineering attended the
Blue Cross/Blue Shield Active Living Grant kickoff meeting at the Lebanon
Hills Regional Park Visitor Center on September 26th. The agencies of
Apple Valley, Eagan, Rosemount and Dakota County make up this local
grant recipient group.
➢ Revestors has closed on the 2 acre parcel (former Manley property) at the
southwest corner of Red Pine and Biscayne; they will be submitting plans at
some point in the future to expand the Red Pine Crossings development to
that corner.
Staff will be happy to provide a brief overview of these items and/or respond to questions at
Tuesdays meeting. As always, staff is available between meetings to respond to questions that may
come to Council members' attention from the community.
A
)SI w=uldmgAotivilyReports/CorwerchlReports for CC-10N91M
•
City of Eagan Yeo
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2006
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION / OCTOBER 17, 2006 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
NEW BUSINESS
D. Lone Oak Business Campus Environment Assessment Worksheet — Attached for City
Council review is a copy of the EAW Response Package that includes an Introduction, Findings
of Fact, responses to comment letters received referenced as pages 146A through 146FF.
•
/s/ Thomas L. Hedees
City Administrator
0
LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS
EAW RESPONSE PACKAGE
• October 16, 2006
1. INTRODUCTION
The package includes materials for City Council consideration and deliberation on the
proposed Lone Oak Business Campus EAW. Following is some background information
on the project and the EAW process.
The Lone Oak Business Campus is a proposed commercial development, involving the
construction of 644,000 square feet of office space, plus 32,000 square feet of warehouse,
3,058 surface and 180 underground parking spaces. The site is north of Ione Oak Road at
the eastern corporate limit of the city of Eagan.
The project developer, Jim Deanovic, prepared a draft EAW for review by the City staff
and the City's consultant, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The staff -approved EAW was
submitted to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on September 1, 2006. The EQB
published the EAW Availability Notice in the EQB Monitor on September 11, 2006,
initiating a 30 -day Comment Period. The EAW Comment Period ended on October 11,
2006.
• Included in this package you will find the following materials for your review:
U
❖ Findings of Fact regarding the need for an EIS
❖ Written comments received during the EAW Comment Period, with written responses
to substantive comments.
2. FINDINGS OF FACT
After an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for a project
and the 30 -day comment period expires, the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) must
determine whether the effects of the project are significant enough to warrant preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). For the Lone Oak Business Campus, the
City of Eagan is the RGU.
The Environmental Review Rules provide that the RGU "base its decision regarding the
need for an EIS and the proposed scope on the information gathered during the EAW
process and the comments received on the EAW." Minn. Rules Chapter 4410.1700,
Subpart 3. The completeness (identification of all issues) and adequacy (issue discussion)
of the EAW are key to the EIS decision. These two components are addressed as
follows:
Page 1 10/16/2006
14& A
Issue Identification
Based on knowledge of the project and the Eagan land use and transportation plans, the •
Lone Oak Business Campus EAW has addressed the potential environmental issues
associated with the project. The comments received during the EAW comment.period
address the issues discussed in the EAW and did not raise any new issues.
The key issues addressed by the EAW include the following:
Shoreland: A portion of the proposed project lies within the City's Shoreland Overlay
District, as noted in the EAW. Shoreland ordinance compliance was not specifically
addressed in the EAW as it has yet to be addressed though the Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) process. The need for a CUP was noted in the EAW. Notification of the MnDNR
will be required as part of the CUP.
Wetlands: A thorough wetland impact analysis was prepared for the project and
summarized in the EAW. Of the 14.4 acres of wetland on the site, approximately 1. 14
acres (7.9%) will be impacted by the project. Impacts will be replaced on-site at the
required 2:1 replacement ratio. The Gun Club Watershed District will review the project
under the requirements of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act.
Surface water runoff and potential for water quality impacts: Grading and Drainage
Plans were included in the EAW, along with peak discharge rates for anticipated runoff.
In response to a comment by the MnDNR, the project proposer provided additional data
on runoff volume (see section 3 of this document). Erosion and sedimentation controls •
were thoroughly discussed in the EAW and are subject to regulation by the MPCA under
the NPDES permit process. The project proposer will continue to work with City staff
through the project approval process to ensure that stormwater runoff is properly
managed.
Traffix. A traffic study was completed for the proposed project by the City's consultant,
SRF Consulting Group, to evaluate traffic impacts at key intersections and recommend
improvements necessary to support the proposed Lone Oak Business Campus
development and other future developments in the northeast area in the City of Eagan, as
well as the northwest area in the City of Inver Grove Heights. The study takes into
consideration the previous Northeast Eagan Area Wide Traffic Study, dated May 6, 2005.
The traffic analysis for year 2007 conditions assumes that the following developments
will be constructed:
- Lone Oak Business Campus
- Grand Oaks 5a` Addition
- Oakview Center (hotel only)
- CSM (#5)
- Laukka-Beck (school only)
The projected volumes were analyzed assuming the existing roadway network. 2007 peak •
hour capacity analysis results indicate that all intersections are expected to operate at
Page 2 n 10/16/2006
acceptable levels of service during the am. and p.m. peak hours. Consistent with the
2005 Traffic Study, the EAW traffic analysis assumes the following improvements:
• - Construct an additional eastbound and westbound through lane on TH 55 between
TH 149 (N) and TH 149 (S)
- Construct an additional eastbound left -turn lane on TH 55 at Lone Oak Road
Neither of these improvements are presently programmed or scheduled for construction.
Currently, the Dakota County North/South Corridor study is being conducted for the area
surrounding the project site in Eagan and Inver Grove Heights. Results of this study will
provide forecast traffic volumes from a regional perspective, which will inform decisions
on roadway improvements needed in the area. The City will work with Dakota County,
Mn/DOT and the Federal Highway Administration to identify priority projects and
determine'possible funding sources for needed improvements. The project proposer will
likely need to participate in funding a portion of the improvements, which will be
negotiated as part of the City's approval process.
Access: The current site plan depicts four direct access points along Lone Oak Road. The
main site access roadway is proposed as a temporary cul-de-sac on the northern end, with
future plans to develop a north -south roadway connection to O'Neil Road. It should be
noted that Lone Oak Road is a county highway (CSAH 26) so access to this roadway will
require review and approval by Dakota County. According to Dakota County access
spacing guidelines, it is possible that one full -access and two right-in/right-out access
points will be allowed along Lone Oak Road. However, the two limited access points
• will likely function as full -access driveways until the roadway is upgraded to a four -lane,
divided highway. The project will require review under the Dakota County Contiguous
Plat Ordinance prior to City approval.
Cultural Resources: The Minnesota Historic Society was contacted for comments on the
potential impacts of the project. No comments were submitted by the MHS regarding the
presence of cultural resources at.the site.
❖ Adequacy of Discussion
The EAW adequately addresses the issues presented. The comments received and the
responses to the comments expanded the information base relating to the identified
issues. In combination, it appears that all of the issues identified in the EAW have been
addressed with adequate responsive fact and discussion.
❖ Consideration of Factors
The Environmental Review Rules at Minn. Rules Chapter 4410.1700, Subpart 7 also
provides the following guidance:
"In deciding whether a project has the potential for,signif cant environmental
effects, the following factors shall be considered:
• A. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects;
B. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects;
Page 3 �� 10/16/2006
C. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by on-
going public regulatory authority, and;
D. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as •
a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public
agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs."
The following discussion serves as Findings of Fact in relation to the factors identified in
the environmental review rules relating to EIS preparation:
A. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects
Each of the key issues (identified in the previous section of this document) was
adequately addressed in the EAW and responses to comments. Mitigation measures have
either been identified or will be developed as part of the design and project approval
process. An appropriate level of technical analysis was completed to determine that none
of the issues pose a potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, an EIS is
not warranted under this criterion.
B. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects
The EAW identifies a number of potential areas of cumulative impacts that could occur
as the area develops in the future; however; there is adequate protection of these
resources through on-going agency oversight to conclude that significant adverse impacts
are not anticipated and an EIS is not warranted under this criterion.
C. Extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by on-going, •
public regulatory authority
Each of the key issues is subject to on-going public regulatory authority through local,
county, state and federal approval processes. Therefore, an EIS is not warranted under
this criterion.
D. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a
result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the
project proposer, including other EISs.
The environmental effects of this project are well understood and similar effects have
been studied on a variety of other projects in the metro area. Mitigation measures are
available for all potential effects and will be regulated by public agencies with
jurisdiction over affected resources. Therefore, an EIS is not warranted under this
criterion.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the anticipated environmental effects of the project identified in the EAW,
along with comments received during the 30 -day comment period, have been evaluated
using the criteria set forth in Minnesota EQB rules. The City of Eagan has concluded
that, based upon these criteria, the proposed Lone Oak Business Campus development
does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement will not be required for the project. •
Page 4 1�� 10/16/2006
3. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING EAW COMMENT PERIOD,
WITH WRITTEN RESPONSES TO SUBSTANTIVE COMMENTS
During the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 30 -day comment period, 5
comment letters were received by the City of Eagan. The comments contained in these
letters have been addressed as follows, with copies of each comment letter included at the
end of this section.
LETTER 1: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
❖ EAW Item No. 6. Description
Noted, coverage in Figure 2 is incorrect. Area on Figure 3 better spatially represents the
project area site.
❖ EAW Item No. 10, Cover Types
While the City does not have jurisdiction of wood disposal from private land, the project
proposer will be encouraged to contact the MnDNR to discuss their comment.
❖ EAW Item No. 14, Water -Related Land Use Management District
The project will be reviewed and conform with the City's Shoreland Overlay District
zoning regulations. Presently, the site plan proposes 39 percent impervious coverage in
the Shoreland Overlay District. The ordinance limits impervious coverage to 25 percent
• for commercial development in the shoreland of a General Development Lake but states
that such coverage may be increased with a Conditional Use Permit:
"Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot. This may be
increased provided the city has approved and implemented a community -wide
stormwater management plan affecting the subject site, granted a conditional use permit
permitting an increase in impervious coverage, and required the necessary water quality
mitigation features to meet non -degradation standards for phosphorous for the nearest
downstream recreational water body identified in the Eagan Water Quality Management
Plan. "
The City Council will consider this issue as part of the Conditional Use Permit process.
MnDNR notification is required as part of this process and the agency's comments will
be considered in the City Council's Conditional Use Permit decision.
❖ EAW Item No. 17, Water Ouality: Surface Water Runoff
The existing and proposed drainage models were analyzed to determine
changes in water level bounce to, DNR Waters 54P and 256W.
Information from the Eagan SWMP was used to determine 54P and 256W
pond storage and overall drainage area. The existing and proposed bounce
for each DNR water body were analyzed based on the 1 -year, 2 -year, 5 -
year, 10 -year, and 24-hour storm events. .
The proposed bounce will be within 0.5 foot or less for each DNR water
. for each storm event with the exception of the 54P 100 -year event. The
Page 5 �� 10/16/2006
I
54P proposed bounce will be below 1 foot based on the 100 -year. The
expected increases of bounce should not cause significant impact to either
water body. Rate -restrictive orifices are intended to be placed in each •
proposed pond to limit downstream impacts and protect downstream
waters. Detailed HydroCAD models are on file with the City. Also on
file with the City are the select Eagan SWMP figures and tables which
were used to obtain the DNR waters 54P and 256W data for this study.
LETTER 2: MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
No items for review or comment were detailed in the agency's letter. The City is aware
of MPCA's permit requirements, as noted in the EAW, and will ensure that the developer
complies with these requirements.
LETTER 3: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Mn/DOT)
❖ Traffic
Mn/DOT's letter raises several important issues regarding anticipated traffic growth,
potential impacts on the state highway system and roadway improvements assumed by
the EAW traffic analysis. The City recognizes that development in the northeastern
portion of Eagan, as well as northwestern Inver Grove Heights, will result in significant
pressure on the area's transportation system. Several traffic studies have been completed
in the area and the Dakota County North/South Corridor Study is currently underway.
The City is committed to working with Mn/DOT, the County, Inver Grove Heights and
FHWA to address transportation system concerns and identify appropriate improvements. •
Timing and funding issues will be part of these on going discussions.
❖ Traffic analysis section of EAW
Mn/DOT's letter notes that the I-35E/Lone Oak Road (CSAR 26) interchange is not
addressed by the traffic analysis in the EAW. This interchange is not in the study area for
the traffic analysis as it is approximately two miles west of the project site and would be
served by other regional roadways including TH 55, TH 149 and I-494. The traffic
analysis does include the I-494/TH 149 interchange and concludes that the ramp
intersections will experience an acceptable level of service in both 2007 and 2017.
The traffic analysis completed for the EAW was coordinated with previous studies in the
area and, and far as the City knows, this analysis is consistent with the assumptions used
in other traffic assessments.
•'• Permits
The project does not appear to impact any Mn/DOT right of way.
LETTER 4: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
❖ EAW Item No. 8. Permits and Approvals Required •
The City is aware of the Metropolitan Council's requirements for sanitary sewer
extensions and will comply as recommended.
Page 6 /4(OF 10/16/2006
❖ EAW Item No. 17, Water Ouality — Surface Ouality Runoff
The City concurs with the Metropolitan Council's recommendations regarding low -
impact design development techniques and will work with the project proposer to
implement appropriate measures to minimize runoff impacts.
LETTER 5: DAKOTA COUNTY
Site Access
The City and the project proposer are aware that the proposed project will require review
under the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance prior to City approval and will work
with the County on appropriate location and spacing of access points to the site.
6• Traffic
Dakota County's letter raises several important comments regarding the traffic analysis
completed for the EAW. The letter notes that 6,086 peak hour trips will be generated by
this development at full build out. To clarify, this figure is the total for all developments
anticipated in the area by 2017. The Lone Oak Business Campus project, which is the
subject of this EAW, will generate 1,012 peak hour trips in 2007.
The traffic analysis is attached at the end of the EAW and follows the practices
recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. It includes the first year of
the proposed project (2007) and ten years after the initial development (2017), which are
practical timeframes for assessing transportation system needs. A 20 year forecast, which
• is typically required in federal environmental documents, is not required for an EAW.
While the improvements on CSAH 26 are not in the current CIP, both the cities and the
County have agreed to include this project in their CIP for 2011. The project will include
widening of CSAH 26 to a four -lane divided highway from TH 55 in Eagan to CR 63 in
Inver Grove Heights.
The City is currently working with the County on the Dakota County North/South
Corridor Study, which will inform decisions on roadway improvements needed in the
area. The City is committed to working with the County, Mn/DOT, Inver Grove Heights
and FHWA to address transportation system concerns and identify appropriate
improvements. Timing and funding issues will be part of these ongoing discussions.
4- Environmental
If a potentially contaminated site, storage tank or well is found during this project,
appropriate steps will be taken to address the issue. Coordination with utilities will be
the responsibility of the project proposer. Wetlands were thoroughly addressed in the
EAW, which noted that impacts will be replaced on-site at the required 2:1 replacement
ratio. The Gun Club Watershed District will review the project under the requirements of
the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act.
• H: ProjecW5&09/EP/ RepoftTina11EAW Resp Pkge 10-16-06.doc
Page 7 ,1 , q 10/16/2006
LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS
EAW RESPONSE PACKAGE
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
1)
MnDNR
2)
MPCA
3)
Mn/DOT
4)
METRO COUNCIL
5)
DAKOTA COUNTY
Page 8 10/16/2006
•
•
•
0
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Michael Ridley, City Planner
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road'
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, Minnesota 55106
651.772.7900
October 10, 2006
RE: Lone Oak Business Campus Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Dear Mr. Ridley:
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the proposed Lone Oak
Business Campus in the City of Eagan. We offer the following comments for your consideration.
Description (Item No. 6)
The project boundary depicted in Figure 2, USGS Map, is incorrect. It leaves out the north 20
acres of the project, including most of that portion of Unnamed Basin #19-54P that falls within
• the project limits. The aerial photograph (Figure 3) appears to correctly show the project area.
Cover Types (Item No. 10)
The table shows the conversion of 8.4 acres of wooded/forest cover. This may result in the
removal of a significant amount of wood from the site. Depending on the condition of this wood,
the project proposer may elect to market it as sawlog, landscaping material, firewood, or bio -fuel
for the production of energy. We strongly recommend that the City contact Jean Mouelle,
Regional Forest Utilization and Marketing Specialist (651 772-7567), for advice on this subject.
The EAW requires a discussion of project compatibility with shoreland zoning district land use
restrictions. The northern three fourths of the site are located within a designated shoreland
zoning district. Provisions of the city's shoreland ordinance limit impervious surface coverage
and building height and require that 50% of the area within the shoreland district be maintained
in permanent open space.
Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff (Item No 17)
The water quality of the two DNR -regulated basins on the site is relatively good. These basins
- have rather -small -,low -development -drainage -areas. -While-the-EAW-speaksto-a-reduction-in—
the peak runoff rate for the 5 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year storm events, it does not identify and
address the anticipated increase in runoff volume resulting from the proposed land use
conversion. We expect that runoff volume from the site will be substantially greater if the
• development proceeds as proposed. Therefore, we recommend that the EAW quantify the
An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity
DNR Informa8on: 651-296-6157 1-888-646-66367 TTY: 651-296-5484 1-800-657-3929
Lone, Oak Business Campus
October 10, 2006
Page 2
impacts to the two major receiving waterbodies in terms of the water level bounce expected for
each for the 1, 2, 5, 10, and 100 -year events. The smaller, more frequent events (1 and 2 year)
tend to have greater long-term ecological impact on water resources than the larger but less
frequent events.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and the EAW. We look forward to receiving
your record of decision and responses to comments at the conclusion of environmental review.
If you have any questions about these comments, please call Wayne Barstad, the Regional
Environmental Assessment Ecologist, at 651-772-7940.
Sincerely,
for
Joseph M. Kurcinka
Regional Director
C: Steve Colvin, Wayne Barstad, Sarah Wren, Diana Regenscheid, Pat Lynch
Dave Zappetillo Heather Tetrault, Bernice Cramblit (DNR)
Jon Larsen (EQB)
Nick Rowse (USFWS)
ERDB #20070117
EG06Lone0ak.doc
An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity
DNR Infounatlon: 651-296-6157 1-668.646.6367 TTY: 651-296-5484
1.800.657-3929
11
•
•
1 ..
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, MN 55155.4194 1 651-296-6300 1 800-657-3864 1 651-282-5332 TTY I www.Pca.state.mn.us
•
October 5, 2006
Mr. Michael Ridley
City of Eagan Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Lone Oak Business Campus
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Dear Mr. Ridley:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has received copies of the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prepared for the above project, prepared by the city of Eagan,
Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU). The MPCA has not reviewed the EAW for this project.
Therefore, the MPCA has no specific comments to provide the RGU. This decision not to
• review the EAW does not constitute waiver by the MPCA of any pending permits required by
the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the project proposer to secure any required
permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. The enclosed checklist identifies
permits that the project may require, together with the most recent contacts at the MPCA.
We remind the RGU that, pursuant to Minn. R. 4410.1700, subp. 5 (Environmental Quality
Board Rules), a copy of the RGU's decision on this EAW needs to be sent to the MPCA..
�ssica Ebertz
' Project Manager
Environmental Review and Operations Section
Regional Division
JE:mbo U U
Enclosure I JI
- --- --- -- - — — A' U
---
cc: Jim Deanovic, Lone Oak Development, LLC D Q D
nc� i o zoos
St. Paul I Brainerd I Detroit Lakes I Duluth I Mankato I i arfha11 Rochester I Willmar Printed on 100% post -consumer recycled paper
CHECKLIST
After a cursory review of the proposed project, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff noted areas that may
need additional follow-up and/or a permit from the MPGA. Those specific areas are checked below:
SDS Permit — Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
A State Disposal System (SDS) Permit is required for any extension of a sanitary sewer. If a sanitary sewer is
proposed as a part of this project, an application for the SDS Permit should be made to the MPCA by contacting
David Sahli, Municipal Division (MUN), Metro Region, at 651/296-8722.
❑ NPD$S/SDS Permit for dredged matetial disposal.
If disposal of dredged material is anticipated, then Brett Ballavance (Duluth office) at 218/7234837 or Jaramie
Logelin (Duluth office) at 218/529-6257 (northern), or Elise Doucette (MUN/Metro Region) at 651/296-7290 or
.Jeff Smith (Rochester office) at 507/285-7302 (southern) should be contacted.
NPDES Permit — Construction Stormwater:
A General National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the MPCA for construction
activities will be required for all projects that disturb one (1) or more acres of land The NPDES Permit
specifically requires Best Management Practices which are detailed in the permit (additional information can be
found in the MPCA document Protecting Water Quality in Urban Area) to prevent erosion and control
sedimentation during construction and a storrawater pollution prevention plan to manage pollutants in storm -
water runoff from the site that will occur atter construction is complete. As a requirement of the NPDES Permit,
storm -water wet -detention ponds must be installed to treat the storm -water runoff whenever a project replaces
surface vegetation with one or more cumulative acres of impervious surface. If you have need of technical
assistance. regarding this, please contact Michael Findorff (MUN/Metro Region) at 651/296-6798 or Todd Smith
(MUN) at 651/215-6008. For more general information, please contact the appropriate MPCA Regional Office
staff below:
❑ Brainerd, Lisa Woog at 218/855-5017
❑ Duluth, Jim Dexter at 218/529-6253
❑ Detroit Lakes, Joyce Cieluch at 218/846-7387
❑ Willmar/Marsball, Yudy Mader (St. Paul office) at 651/296-7315 or
Mark Hanson -(Marshall Office) at 507/537-6000
❑ Rochester, Roberta Getman at 507/280-2996
Metro, Brian Gove (REM/Metro Region) at 651/296-7597
❑ Industrial Stormwater
❑ Brainerd, Robin Novotny at 218/828.6114
❑ Duluth, John Thomas at 218/723-4928
❑ Detroit Lakes, Jack Frederick at 218/846-0734
❑ Marshall, Brad Gillingham at 507/537-6381
❑ Mankato, Teri Roth at 507/389-5235
El Rochester, Dennis Hayes at 507t280-2991
❑ Rochester, Jeff Smith at 507/285-7302
❑ Major Facilities, Elice Doucette (MUN/Mbtro Region) at 651/296-7290
❑ Willmar, Ben Koplin at 320/231-5321
❑ Septic Tank System
Individual septic tank systems design and construction must comply with Minn. R. 7080.
- — �— - or addinonaI—mfbrmation, coataciMark Wespetal N��tericcy an Coordination) at
651/296-9322.
6/21/05O
�A
' 1 OVER
1 %V
•
CJ
•
j� Water Quality Certification
l� Waiver of the Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification is required When wetlands are altered or
impacted by filling, drainage, excavation, or inundation as part of the federal Clean Water Act Section 404 permit
O process, a statement waiving the 401 Certification from our agency must be obtained.
If you have any questions regarding this, please contact Jennifer Olson, of the Regional Division, Business
Systems Unit 1, at 651/297-8611. The MPCA requires the project be evaluated for mitigation in accordance with
the following hierarchy of preference:
a. Avoid the impact.
b. Minimize the impact.
c. Mitigate the impact through wetland replacement.
❑ Demolition Debris
Demolition debris must be disposed of at a properly permitted disposal facility. For information on the location
of one nearest you, please contact the appropriate MPCA Regional Office staff below:
❑ Brain6rd, Glut Hoffman at 218/828-6198
0 Detroit Lakes, Roger Rolf at 218/846-0774
Duluth, Heidi Kroening at 218/723-4795 or Tim Musick at 218/723-4708
❑ Marshall, Brad Gillingham at 507/537-6381
❑ Rochester, Mark Hugeback at 507/280=5585
❑ Metro, Jackie Deneen (NW at 651/297-5847
❑ Asbestos
Asbestos maybe present in the buildings) that will be demolished, which requires special handling Please
contact Jackie Deneen (MW at 651/297-5847 for additional information.
A ❑ Wells
Abandonment and/or installation of wells must be done by a licensed well driller. Please contact the Minnesota
Department of Health 651/215-0823 for additional information.
❑ Above and Below Ground Tanks
The installation and/or removal of ALJ, above and below ground tanks must be reported to the MPCA before any
work begins. Please contact the MPCA Customer Assistance Center at 651/297-2274 or 800/646-6247 for
additional information
C1
❑ Potential Cumulative Effects
The section of the EAW designated for the analysis and discussion of potential cumulative effects is
incomplete. Please iefer to Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi Board of
Commissioners, 713 N.W.2d 817 (Minn 2006). The Court held that a "cumulative potential effects" inquiry
under Minn R. 4410.1700, subp. 7, requires a Responsible Governmental Unit to inquire whether a
proposed project, which may not individually have the potential to cause significant environmental effects,
could have a significant effect when considered along with other projects that (1) are already in existence,
are actually planned for, or for which a basis of expectation has been laid; (2) are located in the surrounding
area; and (3) might reasonably be expected to affect the same natural resources
❑ Other Issues Identified by Staff
6/21/05 2 OVER
I�
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan District
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B-2 •
Roseville MN 55113-3174
October 11, 2006
Mr. John Hohenstein
Director of Community Development
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
SUBJECT: Lone. Oak Business Campus EAW
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Mn/DOT Review #EAW 06-027
One mile east of Trunk Highway (TH) 55 on the north side of Lone Oak Road
Eagan/Dakota County
Control Section 1909
Dear Mr. Hohenstein
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above -referenced
Planned Unit Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet that we received on Sept. 11,
2006. Please note that Mn/DOT's review of this EAW does not constitute approval of a regional
traffic analysis and is not a specific approval for access or new roadway improvements. As plans
are refined, we would like the opportunity to meet with the City and Dakota County to review the •
updated information. Mn/DOT's staff has reviewed the document and has the following
comments:
Traffic.,
The Mn/DOT Metro District Transportation System Plan (TSP) identified the need for
the addition of a third lane to TH 55 in the 2008 — 2014 time frame, but no funding has
been identified for a lane addition. There are many assumed roadway improvements
proposed for the Mn/DOT Trunk Highway system in this EAW. However, these
proposed improvements are not identified as funded by Mn/DOT during the more than
20 -year period included within the Mn/DOT 2008-2030 Transportation System Plan. For
questions on these points, please call Ken Johnson, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area
Engineer, at (651) 582-1379.
Traffic analysis section of EAW:
The traffic analysis section of the EAW does not address the impact of the proposed
development upon the Interstate 35E and Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26) interchange..
However. Lone Oak Road provides direct access from Interstate 35E to the propose(
business site. The proposed development appears likely to have an effect on the traffic
projected in the EAW for the TH 149 exit ramp onto east bound Interstate 494.
The EAW notes that a "realistic level of infrastructure improvements" should be built but,.-
does
ut
does not identifyan funding for an improvements- J `' �•
y g y �mp s �,� t� � 'J �s U
1 O QCT 12 2006
An equal opportunity employer ' ' "
Information is needed on what specific Mn/DOT Trunk Highway and other roadway
(City and County) infrastructure improvements may be needed. This can be developed
by estimating current and future traffic volumes that the development will likely add to
the existing transportation system.
Based on the 2017 Peak Hour traffic projections for the Interstate 494/TH 149
interchange, this interchange should be reconfigured. This potential improvement should
be added to the "list of infrastructure improvements" as part of the improvements
identified for the Interstate 494/TH 149 interchange. A funding source, other than
Mn/DOT, will need to be identified.
There are a number of on-going local traffic assessments being conducted in the vicinity
of the proposed development (see enclosure). A comparison should be included in the
traffic analysis section to assure that the traffic assessments identified in the traffic
analysis are consistent with the traffic characteristics being used for the on-going local
traffic assessments. For questions on these points, please call Jim Aswegan at Mn/DOT
Metro District Traffic Engineering at (651) 582-1618.
Permits:
• Any work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available
® from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility . Please direct any
questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's
Metro Permits Section.
•
As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as
plats and site plans to:
Development Reviews
Mn/DOT - Metro Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B-2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2)
copies of other review documents including site plans.
Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will
make a submittal incomplete and delay MWDOT's 30 -day review and response process to
development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary
number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete
If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at
(651)582-1462.
Im
Sincerely,
acyMary M? c
cNeff
Transportation Planner
0
Enclosure: List of on-going local traffic assessments, northeast Eagan, MN
Copy: Todd Tollefson, Dakota County Surveyor, Apple Valley, MN
Kristi Sebastian, Dakota County Traffic Engineer, Apple Valley, MN
Michael J. Ridley, City Planner, Eagan, MN
Gary Tushie, Tushie-Montgomery & Associates, Inc.
Julie Wischnack, SRP Consulting Group, Inc.
Bill Weber, MPRA, Inc.
•
1� �
October 11, 2006
• Interim list of on-going local traffic assessments impacting on Mn/DOT Trunk
Highways, northeast Eagan, MN:
1. Post Office, Lone Oak Road and Interstate 494
2. Dakota County -based assessments
3. Three -city Consortium (Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount ?)
To be updated later.
CJ
VA Metropolitan Council (� /
Building communities that work
October 11, 2006 •
Michael 1. Ridley, City Planner
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
RE: Eagan - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Lone Oak Business Campus
Metropolitan Council District 16
Metropolitan Council Review No. 19834-1
Dear Mr. Ridley:
The Lone Oak Business Campus project proposes the construction of 676,000 square feet of office
space, 32,000 square feet of warehouse, and 3,106 parking spaces on approximately 85 acres in the City
of Eagan. The Project is located on Lone Oak Road on the south and on the east by the City of Inver
Grove Heights.
Council staff has conducted a review of this EAW to determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing
regional concerns and the potential for significant environmental impact. An EIS is not necessary for
regional purposes. However, staff offers the following comments for your consideration:
Item 8 - Permits and Approvals Required •
In accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 473.513, at the time the City makes application to the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for a permit to construct each segment of the proposed
sanitary sewer project, a copy of the plans, design data, and a location map of the project will also need
to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The Council's Environmental Service Municipal Services
staff will need to review, comment, and recommend issuance of the construction permit by the MPCA
before connection can be made to the City's wastewater disposal system.
Item 17— Water Quality —Surface Water Runoff
On-site soils have been identified as being either sandy or silt loams, both of which are characterized as
either moderately well drained or well drained soils, and therefore favorable for incorporation of
infiltration techniques. The identification of plans to construct extensive surface parking areas
(exceeding 3,000 spaces) incorporating a number of parking lot islands would offer several sites where
bio -retention and low -impact development techniques could be incorporated. The Council recommends
the proposed project incorporate low -impact design development techniques in its final design to
beneficially retain runoff that reduce total off-site runoff. Those techniques could include incorporation
of:
• depressed rather than elevated planting areas to retain moisture and infiltrate smaller (more
— --'-
sediment -laden) ram alI events, an -
• a piped overflow/under-drain system to remove runoff from larger than average events to
maintain full use of the parking areas and minimize erosion of the planting areas. 2
The Metropolitan Council's Urban Small Sites BMP Manual includes detailed informat h Qtz Q
management practices. The manual is available at: IUnlil
htto•//wwwmetrocouncil.ore/environmentfWat�ersjhed/BMP/manual.htm. OCT 1 2 2006
w .metrocounca.org 14 W Metro Info Gne 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651) 602-1000 • Fax 602-1550 • TIY 281-0904
M Equal OppartungyErnplayer
•
Michael I Ridley
October 11, 2006
Page 2
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Patrick Boylan, Principal
Reviewer, at 651-602-1438.
Sincerely,
Phyl ' Hanson, Manager
Office of Planning &Technical Assistance
cc: Jack Jackson, Multifamily Market Analyst, MHFA
Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division
Brian McDaniel, Metropolitan Council District 16
Patrick Boylan, Principal Reviewer
Cheryl Olsen, Reviews Coordinator
V:\REVIEWS\Communidm\Eagan\Letters\Eagen 2006 EAW LogeAak Bus. Campus-19834-1.dw
Office of Planning
Lynn G. MoraudmAICP
Planning Manager
Dakota County
Western Service Center
14955 Galaxie Avenue
Apple Valley, MN 55124
952.891.7030
Fax 952.891.7031
wwwco.dakommn.us
f5
.an mx wusaw..a�w.�.
I
October 12, 2006
Michael Ridley
City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
RE: Dakota County Comments on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the
Lone Oak Business Campus
Dear Mr. Ridley:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the environmental assessment
worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Lone Oak Business Campus.
The environmental assessment worksheet has been reviewed by staff in the Physical
Development Division. Our comments are included with this letter. In addition, we have
also attached a series of maps and tables that further explain our comments.
We look forward to working with you as this project moves forward. If you have any
questions, please call me at (952) 891-7033.
Sincerely,
Lyn ' oratzka, Manager
Office of Planning
End
cc: Thomas Egan, Dakota County Commissioner — District 3
Brandt Richardson, County Administrator
Greg Konat, Director, Physical Development
(TW l
11
r1
L_J
Dakota County Comments: Lone Oak Business Campus
• The proposal calls for construction of 676,000 square feet of office space on approximately 85
acres bounded on the south by Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26) and on the east by the City of Inver
Grove. The project includes four parcels, PIN# 100010001575, PIN# 100010001175,
100010001475, and 100010001375.
Section 7: Figure 4 — Site Plan
The EAW states the development will have one full access with three right in/right out private
driveways, of which two will be temporary. Access spacing needs io comply with the County's
access spacing guidelines and will be subject to further review when the development plat is
submitted for Plat Commission review.
No driveway access should be permitted to Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26). Since the westerly and
easterly accesses essentially only serve one building, there is a question of whether they meet
County access standards.
In addition, the layout does not adequately show accesses and development on the south side of
CSAH 26: The main access location needs to align with the approved access on the south side
of CSAH 26.
Section 21 - Traffic
• Transportation staff is interested in the impacts of the proposed site to the surrounding County
highway system. With 6,086 aftemoon peak hour vehicle trips being generated from this
development at full build out a traffic impact study needs to identify the transportation impacts,
deficiencies, and the needs related to the proposed development The study needs to provide
the basis for the developer and the governmental agencies (City, County, Stats).to fully
understand traffic operations as the site develops and as surrounding traffic continues to grow
and to identity the necessary improvements to allow the development and overall highway traffic
to operate in a safe and efficient manner.
The document provides a summary of a traffic study that was prepared but not included with the
distributed Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The traffic impact study should follow
practices recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication "Transportation
Impact Analyses for Site Development" for analysis. The analysis needs to identify when there
are levetof service issues and roadway network deficiencies occurring on available roadways
due to the development and area traffic volume increases. The study needs to identify needed
roadway improvements. This analysis should identify deficiencies and needs for existing
operations, at development opening, and through 2025. Instead, the current traffic study
analyzes Impacts and improvements needed for the years 2007 and 2017, basing it on the years
when development of the site occurs and roadway improvement assumptions, which does not
identify when the deficiencies are initially occurring. -
The study summary assumes that certain improvements will be made to area roadways. The
Capital Improvement Program. The study should also investigate if Mn/DOT has these assumed
improvements programmed in their project program before assuming the improvements to be in-
place. The traffic analysis needs to analyze impacts without these improvements that are not
• programmed and identify what improvements will be needed.
��u
Dakota County Comments: Lone Oak Business Campus
Sections 12,13, 18, 20 —_Environmental
Waste Sites and Spills
County Environmental Management Staff did not identify any waste sites either on or directly
adjacent to the subject property. Ninety-eight waste sites were identified within approximately
one mile of the subject property. A waste site is an area where solid or hazardous wastes are
disposed, where hazardous materials are spilled or leaked, or where contaminants are leached or
otherwise released into the environment Waste sites range from well known to unknown, recent
to very old, surfiaal to buried, small to large, inert to reactive, and relatively safe to hazardous.
Environmental contamination affects -the air, land, surface water, and groundwater and may
seriously impact plants, animals, and humans. In short, a site is any waste disposal or
contaminant release potentially impacting the environment and threatening public health and
safety.
Eight MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) VIC (Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup
Program) sites were identified within approximately one mile of the subject property.
One MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) Dump and one permitted solid waste site were
Identified within approximately one mile of the subject property.
Twenty-one MPCA LUST (Leaking Underground Storage Tank) sites were identified within
approximately one mile of the subject property.
Sixty-five MPCA Spill sites were Identified within approximately one mile of the subject property.
The City of Fagan and Lone Oak Development, LLC, should be aware that if development occurs
on, adjacent to, or near a potentially impacted site, soil and groundwater impacts may be
encountered that are not known or identified due to down -gradient migration of groundwater and
surface water. Due to the potential to encounter Impacts from adjacent sites, a radius of
approximately one mile has been used as the standard search radius for this environmental
review. It is also possible that sites will be encountered that have not been identified and are not
known sites. Should impacted soil or water be encountered during this project, a site
investigation and remediation may be required, in accordance with MPCA Guidelines and Dakota
County Ordinances.
Hazardous Waste Generators and Tanks
Fifty-seven hazardous waste generators, with 331 active waste streams permitted, were identified
within approximately one mile of the subject property.
One hundred forty-four MPGA Registered Tanks were Identified within approximately one mile of
the subject property.
Wells
Two registered wells (ID# 174664 and T02320) were identified either on or adjacent to the subject
property. One well is identified as being sealed. Two hundred seventy-three registered wells .
WeMdErtifiettwil"n approximately one mi . eferlaturaltached-table—
for a listing of the identified wells. Well locations are presented on the attached Environmental
Review figure.
•
Since 1974, all water wells constructed in Minnesota have been required to meet the locational •
and constructional requirements of the Minnesota Well Code. Wells are used for domestic and
Dakota County Comments: Lone Oak Business Campus
municipal drinking water supply, water quality monitoring, and irrigation. As wells age, they may
• deteriorate and lose their ability to keep surface contaminants and contaminated groundwater
from impacting deeper aquifers. Because of these concerns, Dakota County requires that at the
time of property transfer, unused wells either be sealed or registered annually. State law requires
that a seller who fails to properly disclose a well, may be liable for well sealing costs for up to six
years after the date of the sale.
Transmission Lines and Pipelines
Existing electric transmission lines and pipelines were Identified within one mile of the subject
property. Contact the pipeline owners for accurate locations and specifications.
Wetlands
Wetlands were identified on the subject property. Caution should be taken to avoid adverse
affects to wetland areas during development Wetlands or ponds identified on the subject
property also extend to adjacent properties and should not be adversely affected by development
or future use. The property has an elevation relief of greater than 50 feet from highland to pond
area. Due to the property elevation, significant erosion issues could occur during development
Adverse affects to the wetland and pond areas should be prevented. Refer to the attached
Natural Resources Review figure for locations of the wetland areas and identified environmentally
sensitive areas.. Wetlands are classified based on the National Wetland Inventory
Please refer to the attached tables for more information regarding the above -referenced sites and
to the attached Environmental Assessment Figure for locations of the above -referenced sites.
Should additional information be needed regarding sites referenced in this report, please contact
• the Dakota County Environmental Management Department at (952) 891-7557.
Disclaimer. The information in this environmental review is made available as a public service.
This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County makes no
representation or warranties, expressed or implied, with reaped to the data provided herein,
regardless of its format or means of transmission. There is no guarantee or representation to the
user as to the accuracy, currency, suitability or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user
accepts the data as W and assumes all dsks.associated with its use. If any discrepancies,
Inaccuracies, or inconsistencies are found, please contact the Dakota County Environmental
Management Department immediately at 952-891-7557.
•
0
i
Envirown-wow •
Lona Oak Business Park, Eagan - EqW
October 9, 2000
ns wane uemrem.
TYPE
312E
I WASTE
GENERATOR GENERATOR
SITE ADDRESS
CII
Me
SOG
Tlpmw
10 TMI Coati Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Ea
Manulact
SOG
us
1 TMI CwU Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
n
mmugw
BOG
Pal Reeks
1 TMI CwU Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Man"
BOG
ON and Water
10 TMI CwU Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
n
mamiep
BOG
Le P
Active
10 TMI Coati Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
BOG
RUF
[Azw
10 TMI Coatings,Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
FA an
Memdea
SQG
Se blaelA Media
-
10 TMI Cwt Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
n
Man lacl _
BOB
a] MM
1 TMI Coatings, Irc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
SOG
Weenw Solvent
10 TO Cwll Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Enown
alenWad
BOG
V
10 TMA Coati Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eamer,
Manufacturing;
SQG
w Clever
10 TMI Coatings, Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
M
Soo
rase
10 TMA Coatings. Ins
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Mantilacturkig
SQG
Fla ble Liquid
Active
80 Ealab Chem End Ceder
310 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
Mended
SOG
caustic Liquid
Active
80 Ecolab Chem Era Cedes
940 Lone Oak Rd
Mem"durky
Soo
LouPeds
MNe
80 Ecolab Chain End Carder
940 Lane 0ak Rd
Eagan
Martufacturing
MG
Fl mswntAMe Lumps
MNe
80 Ecolab Chem Eng Caner
940 Lan Oak Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
SOG
DrA Cell Ballwbs
AcW.
50 Ecolab Chem Em Caner
040 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
MwKftdurkM
BOG
Commistime Liquid
Active
80 E.M Chem Era Caper
940 Lam Oak Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
BOG
Usel 01
AcWe
'50 Ecolab ChwEng - Gamer
940 Lam 0ak Rd
Eagan
Manuladwing
BOG
Piffift, Washer Sohrent
MNe
SC Ecolab Cham End Denier
940 Lone Oak Rd
Ea
n
Manufacturing
SOG
la
ACINe
50 Eodab Over, End Caner
940 Lone Oak Rd
Em
en
Manufacturing
SOG
Co oskm Liquid
Active
801 Ewbb Chem Eng Center
940 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
menufacturkm
SOG
Qx1dwna Liquid
AdNa
50 Ewbb Chem E Or
940 Lone Oak Rd
Even
ManWecl
BOG
L AcMWedea
AkIbm
aolEcakab Chem Eno Cede
940 Lam 0ak Rd
Eagan
menuladurby
BOG
tmaw
Active
50 Ew1ab Chem End Ceder
940 Lom Oak Rd
Eagan
Mended
SOG
te maroun,
Act"
50 Ecolab Chain rns Cela
040 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
BOG
W to famdc sold
MNe
50 Ecolab Chem Ena Center
940 Lam Oak Rd _
Eagan
Vehicle Matraemnee
VSOG
wasMr Solved
Active
Hooveslp
2950 Lone Oak Cade
Eagan
. Vehicle MaFbnanco
VSOG
C Cleenaf
ACWe
Hoowetd
2950 Law Oak CMe
Eagan
VeHde Mandewnce
VSOG
L Add Belledee-
L
Active
891-lomw lol
2050 Lom Oak Ckcts
en
Vehicle MaMenence,
VSQG
KE OD
Active
39 Hooveslol
2850 Lam Oak Ctrde
. Eagan
Vehick, McMaram a
VSQG
OI FSnrs
Active
89 H000eetd.
2950 Lone Oak Cbtla
Empon
Vehicle Mormnamw
VSOG
FidwKSOMAINI.rcum Lmve
A e
8WHomnessol
2950 Lone Oak Circle
Eagan
VaMrde Me",ria ce
VSOG
Aniffnez.
Ac1Ne
89Hommou!
2950 Lone Oak Circle
Eanan
Manufacturing
VSQG
Usltd 01
Active
I 161 Bod&Ar and Som Irc. R.L.
3330 Mike Cads, Or
Eagan
Manulacturing
VSQG
Pohs Wash Salved
AdWe
I i5l Bweker and S. Ino R.L.
3330 Mike Collins, Or
Eagan
mamincturing
VSOG
Fl - wrd?ALamps
MNe
115 Bodeker and Som Ino., R.L.
3330 Mks Colles Or
Eagan
_
hims'lacturby
VSQG
OI Filen
MNe
11 518odlw wd Som Inc. R.L.
3330 Mike Cooks Or
FA
Mimulachoing
VSOG
Lead Acid 6ella11ee
MNe
I 1518coakerend Som Inc.,R.L.
3330 Mike Colica Or
Eagan
Vehicle Makeewnce
BOG
Parts WeNrer Solved
Active
1201 Nath StarDlaael Service LLC
3110 Mike Collis Or
Eagan
Vehicle MaiNemwe
BOG
Leltd Add Batteries
Imdlue
120 Nodh Star Dbael Service, LLC
3110 Mke Colts Dr
Eagan
VehMa Mowemnce
SOG
U&W Do
MNe
120 Nam Star Diesel Service LLC
3110 Mike Collins, Or
Eagan
VeHde Maintenance,
SOG
OilPilesMNe
120 Nath Star Oleeel SeMw LLC
3110 Mike COMMCas Or
Eagan
VeNds Maki erce
m
BOG
s
hee
MNe
120 Nath Star Dime Servke LLC
3110 Mike Colics Dr
Ewan
Mwrc
Vehide Make
SQG
Lelad Acid Batteries
Active
1201 North91ar Ousel Service LLC
3110 Mke Colics Or
Emean
Vow. MaFlamnw
SOG
Iminersior, ChuM
Active
1201 Nath Star Diesel SerAw LLC
3110 Man Cohn, Or
Eagan
Vehicle Mawemnw
SOO
Fbiwavownd/Mercury La s
Active
120 North Star Diesel SeMw LLC
3110 Mike Collins Or
Eagan
Mar"Vadurky
VSOG
NkW Platint Waste
Active
149 Bo.De Metal FkftNm
3350 Mike Co9bn Or
Eagan
Manub,durby
VSQG
C Falling Waste
Mlle
149BDul MeudFkfthIg
3350 Mike Cooks Or
Eagan
Mwdad
VSOG
Add Anew Liquid
Active
149 Bo -Decor Metal Firilshing
3350 Mike Colhs Dr
Eagan
ManWap
VSQG
On
Imdhe
149 Bo-Dewr Metal Finishing
3350 Mks Cods Or
Eagan
Manufacturing
VSOG
Oil Fillers
Imdhe
141111B.-DewrMetaFmIshana
3350 Mks Cooks Or
C -e an
mamindurIng
SOG
nnerAPalyd
Mhe
208 Brown Mpis Tank
2875 Hwy 55
an
Marlufacusira
Manuled
SQG
SOO
M wasMr Sasronl
Ldad Acid Batteries
MNe
MNe .
208 down Mpl, Tank
209 down Mob Tedi
2875 Hm,
2875 Kw 55
Empan
Fa en
M.nulacturing
SQG
UiWd Oil
Active
205 Broom M b Tank
2875 55
Ea
n
Manuladving
BOG
IN RemilurhOSIFIN.
AcUm
208 Brown Mph Tank
2875 HM
Eacern
Manufeput
SOO
FUm
Active
208 Brown M Ie Tank
2875 55
en
Mamt
a—,
F rSolulbn
MNe
203 Brovin Mph Tank
2875 KVY 55
en
Mwdad
SQG
1poffil
Active
20a dorm M b Tank
2575 65
n
E
Environmental Review
Lone Oak Business Park, Eagan - Fl}W
October ll, 2006
`tuis
TYPE '�
SIZE
WASTE.
STATUS GENERATOR i GENERATOR
SITEADDRESS
city
Maradaa
SOG
Fl resarNM Le
We
Brener Mists Tank
2975 65
Eagan
Maradecl
SOG
01 Form
Active
206 BmwnM Toni,
2875 55
an
Menuladal
SOG
St I MBI Sale
AcWe
208 &own M Tank
2875 - 55
Eagan
Printing
VSQG
Mk usr W.ls
Active
215 Cuslem Deek
951 Rd
Ee
Prhl
VSQG
Fl a Le
Ache
215 Custom Dark
957 Ib Rd
n
PmW
VSQG
Active
215 Cuslon Desk
951 Ib Rd
Eagn
Rhtl
VSOG
Pel Booth Fllan
Active
275 Cuslon Doak
951 b Rd
Ea en
Eqdpnwd Repair
VSOG
Wes sown
Active
234 LeNodh Nrerics
855 Rd
W menet Repair
VSOG
Lead Ae10 Bdleri.
Active
239 V Nath Pmerlee
655 Ib Rd
E.n
W N Repair
VSQG
U 00
Active
234 Lahrup North Amerbe
855 Apollo Rd
Eagan
Egotown Repair
VSOG
08 FIRM
Acute
23,111.91ansellorthArreslat
855 Apollo Rd
Eagan
EqdpmfflRe
VSOG
FiLbrescartivivarany Lamps
Active
234 Wo Nath Anatla
81% Apollo Rd
Eagan
Scitipinedi Repair
Olt restern dire
Inactive
2391-e North Americas
855 ApolloRd
Eagan
Ecittip,nailt Repair
VSQG
oiijsor m
Active
234 Le Nwlh Mwiaa
656 Apollo Rd
an
Auto Body
VSQG
Paw Thinner
Active
240 Nada Body Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Auto sody
VSOG
Pa Mer,
Active
240 Arcade Gody Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Eonan
Auto Body
VSOG
I.e6d Add Issued.
IrmdNe
740 Arade Bdy Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Eagann
Auto Body
VSQG
Flrasa
Act"
240 Nada Body Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Auto Body
VSOG
Pand Strioner
Acute
240 Amis Both, Mart,
2815 Dodd Rd
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Part, Washer Schad
Active
3061ndudrlal Service Inc.
2950 Lone Oak Ckde
Ee-
Vehide Maintenance
VSQG
Laid Add BaOeees
Active
308 Indalrlal Service Inc.
29M Lane Oak Ckde
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
Usid 01
Active
30141ndusift Service 1..
2950 Lore Oak Ckcle
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Anfreeze
Active
308 Industrial Service Inn
2950 Lore Oak Cede
an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
OII Fken
Active
3081 Industrial Service Inc.
2850 Loa Oak Cecb
Ea n
Vehicle Makaelrence
VSQG
PatheWspharSpiverd
Active
3731 North S1atFMt Smiom Ire,
3321 Mike COWm Or
Ea
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Laid Add Saserift,
Acute
373INorthburicisesSenwasinc.
3321 Mike Collins Or
Eagan
Venda Makdenanee
VSQG
Usbd 08
Active
373NoM Star Flad Services Im.
3321 Mike Cogho Or
an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
nese
Active
373NoM Star Flad Services Inc.
3327 Mks Collie Or
an
Vehicle MaIrs ance
VSOG
Fl r.ardlM La
Active
3731 North Star Fleet ServicesInc.
3321 Mike Collins Dr
Ea an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Can, Cleaner
Inactive
373 Ncnh Star FMreI Senrices, Inc.
3321 Mika CoBkte Or
n
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Ol Filen
Active
373 Nodh Star Fbat Servka,,1m.
3321 Mae Cocke Or
Ea n
Vehicle Mebaerance
SOO
Washer SONent
Acute
378 Wane Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Vehicle Meide ance
SOG
L Add Betted.
Acute
378 Wd mofl Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Ea
Vehide Maintenance
SOG
OB
Active
378 Wel Ire
2805 Dodd Rd
Vehicle Maintenance
SOG
OI FRera
Active
37 Wate moo Inc -
2805 Dodd Rd
^
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
Washer SoNerd
Active
493 gal Lena Inc
850 Loa Oak Rd
n
Vehkb Makde stance
VSQG
Head 01,
Active
4 Sal Lane Inc
850 Lone Oak Rd
Ea n
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
01F61en
Inactive
493 5d Lane Inc
860 Lane Oak Rd
Ee n
Venda Maintenance
VSOG
Fl nape La
Active
4 Lame Inc
850 Lone Oak Rd
Vehicle Makderance•
VSQG
Cleaner
[resolve
493 SsN Lana Inc
860 Lona Oak Rd
n
E madR
VSQG
Washer
tractive
Foster Minnesota Inc. John
3703Mke Colica Dr
W mentR
VSQG
rouc Dl Tank a
tractive
500 Falx Minreeole Inc. Jim He
3103 Mike Colla Or
en
E tdsant Repair
VSQG
Rel / Solved
Active
500 FasterMlna.ola Inc. John
3103 Mike Cake Or
Eagan
W Repair
VSQG
d Rlien
Acute
500 Faster Minnesota Inc. John Henry3703
Mike Collins Or
an
W Repairnt '
VSQG
08
Acute -
500 Fater Mlnneaata lrn John Herwy
3103 MUM CWka Or
Eagan
E W d Repair
VSOG
OI Filen
Active
500 Foster Minnesota Inc. John Henry3103
Mon Cullbe Or
n
E W menlR r
VSOG
Fl reecenVM Lam
Active
500 Foster Minn vela Inc. John He
3103 Mike Colon Or
n
Ecnifinner,11 Repodr
VSQG
edusis
Active
500 Foster Mirvresoa Inc. John Malay
3103 Mks Octave Or
Ea n
W mad Re
VSOG
ria Cbaar
Active
500 FosterMtmaeota Inc. Jahn Harpy
3103 Mks Coam Or
Eagan
W mat Repair
VSOG
WsaM- ueaa
Active
SW Foster Minnesota Inc. John Henry3103
Mks Collins Or
Eurian
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Ixtem,
Active
581 Do= Corporation
3308 Mike Cake Or
Entire,
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
PArts Washer Sphere
Active 1
581 Done Corporation
3306 Mae Cogan Or
Ea n
Vehicle Mekdenarce
VSQG
U 08
Active
581 Corporation
3308 Mike Colica Or
Ea n
Vehirs
de Mewence
VSQG
O F F.
Active
581 us Ion
3308 Mike Cahn Or
E n
VehMe Maintenance
VSOG
L Acct Belted.
Active
Sal O us nikm
3308 Mks Collin Or
Eve an
Vehicle Menbnance
VSQG
R mn Lem -
Active
581 O us nibs
33M Mae Coehn Or
Fs
VeNde Malyderana
VSOG
b based adMsN.
Active
581 Co Ion
3306 Mike Collins Dr
Eve n
MOG
Was rSolvent
AcWe
539 Roved E W mad
3275 Dodd Rd
Ea n
Md.Maintenance
VeNde McManance
MW
L d Add Belleri.
AcMa
Road W mad
3275 Dodd Rd
Vehlde Mehte
MQG
Died 08
Active
639 Road E W .ra
3275 Dodd Rd
E en
is
i
Environment eW
Lone Oak Business Park, Eagan - EIW
October 0, 2006
0
nK Waele WnelOrVm
TYPE
SIZE
WASTE
STATUS GENERATORN GENERATOR
SITE ADDRESS
city
VeNde MaWentnce
MOG
OII Fliers
Active
639 Road EqtgpmM
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde MaNarmme,
MOG
FI wralMa Lam
AdNe
633 Road E id M
3275 Dodd Rd
Boom
VeNde Manderance
MOG
Ad Ne
ON Raad W M
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Mondad
VSOG
Po Washer Solvent
Active
692 Swlh Pad
6555 E Lane Oak Rd
Eneen
ManWad
VSOG
00
tractive
69 SaWh Park Cort,
655 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagan
Mamded
VS3G
al Fllam
ImrdNa
69 Sotah Ped Co
655 E Lone Oak Rd
Espall
Memfaa
VSOG
Fl oanVM L.P.Active
68 SOVIh Pad Ca
655 E Lone Oak Rd
FAan
Marnfecl
VSOG
L Add"Utdes
Iradtve
682 SOWN Ped Co
855 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagan
Mamdsd
VSOG
Cel Ripens,
Iradws
682 Soe1h Pad
60 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagant
Mended
VSOG
OI Baso PaW
Iradiva
'BB SONh Pad
655 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagan
MenWacl
VSOG
btesalds
Inactive
00 South Pak Co
655 E Lane Oak Rd
FAMn
mwukd
VSOG
Nes
Irmctiva
Sculh Ped
655 E Lona Oak Rd
Eagan
Maniacs
VSOG
la Packs -
AcOre
SOWN Pad
655 E Lane Oak Rd
EaM
VeNde MaWerancs
VSOG
08
Adfle
734HMmr
NO Rd
Eagan
Veldde Maintenance
VSOG
R
A.W.
734HWU
888 Rd
Vehkde MaWanance
VSOG
OI Falem
Active
734 H4sn
BBD lla Rd
an
Whkle Matti.
VSOG
Washer Solvent
Adba
734 HWM
890 IS Rd
an
Manusd
VBQG
aslmr Solvent
Ac"
7 &hon Memdad
- 3115 Mar. Caabm Or -
Ea en
Manulad
VSOG
Part Thinner
Act"
782 8 ken Mamdool
3115 Mike Collins Dr
Eagan
Mamfaa
VSOG
FllbmrsnllM
A< e
7 &boon Memfed
3115Mhe Colhm Dr
Eagan
BLAkI McWenance
MOG
SdWon
Active
7 Nanheest Area,-
.A
2700 Lone Oak
Eagan
BurkinaMaWmarca
MOG
Pl oanVMe Lam
ACWe
785Nodhwest Adores-Btl.A
2700 La. Oak PkwY
Evans,
S4I41 MaNerame,
MOG
COr.W.Wn
Ad
7850fonh al Adbme-Btl,A
2700 Lone Oak
an
BW McNaranee
VSOG
Point Thinner
ACUM
7 Norlh, dAnka,-Btl.N
2800 Lore Oak PI
Eagan
SWtl Matrdenanca
VSOG
ra Filers
Active
788NWhwest Adkm-Stl.N
2800 Lorin Oak PI
an
Sul Melmenarce
VSOG
A Sosem
Active
7 NOdhxeel A li ms -
. N
2800 Lona Oak R
an
SuppingMaNaanca
VSOG
SoNlsa
Inactive
7 Nodhmol Adam-
.N
2800 Lone Oak Pt
Eagan
BW Makderame
VSOG
mulo0a
Act&a
7 NodhomA Adkins-Btl.N
2000 Lora Oak Pt
Eaon
Bm Malm name
VSOG
Fl
Ade
736 Notlhwetl Adkm - Bldg.
N
2600 Lane Oak R
an
BW McWermnce
VSOG
Wade
lrmdive
7 Notthwest AMkae -Bld.N
2600 Lane Oak PI
BwWl Maintenance
VS03
hCHomforn
Inedi"
7 Nodhwet Adlrms-
.N
2800 Lana Oak PI
Es an
adding MaWererce
VSOG
Oa Filers
ACWe
7 NarQmasl Adhms-BId.N
25W Lone Oak Pt
an
BWI41 Wbtlinrenea
VSOG
01 Absorbent,
ALUM
7!4N2!2.1 Anhm-Btl,N
25W Lone Oak PE
Eagan
BW Mato ne"W"
VSOG
lefts Lead Add.
Ac"
788Norow dAdkms-Side.N
2500 Lane Oak Pt -
E en
Burke Mandermrce
VSOG
en Generelar
IractNe
7 NOnhrnnt Abltms - Bldg.
N
29W Lone Oak PI
Sdtli Mawarance
VSOG
ter Trea rent Ch ndcid
Iradlre
78 Nonheasl Adkm - B
. N
2000 Lone Oak PI
'
Ea
BWidl MaWerance
VSOG
L d Add Gaped.
Inactive
7 NorUNreal Adhere -B
. N
2800 Lone Oak Pi
Eagan
BuSft MaWerance
VSOG
Palm Washer Sowers
Acute
7 Nonlnveal Arsm,•
.N
2600 Lone Oak Pt
BulW MakMranro
VSOG
mwk
AcINe
786 Nonhweal Adkins - Bldg.
N
2000 Laren Oak Pt
Eaan
BWBI Mabderarce
VSOG
uta Batteries
Active
788 Nmh mt Adtras - Bldg.
N '
2600 Lane Oak R
Eagan
&itl McWe
VSOG
N Batteries
AcUve
7 Nodhwast Adhm-Bldg.
N
28W Lora Oak PI
BWMI Mabdenenee
VSOG
COO Batteries,
Acute
7 Nodhaeel PMNas -
. N
2800 Lone Oak R
BWBI MaWermnee
VSOG
B's
Active
7 NodhWasl Adhmf -Bldg.N
2600 Lone Oak Pt
an
VeNde Makdomme
VSOG
U 00
Ad
954 Td Adler, T
3275 Dodd Rd
Slow
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Pdft Washer Sol rd
AdIve
954 Tn Actim Tnxkkv
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Vahkip McNanerce
VS3G
Wed Add Batteries
AcINe
854 Td Action T
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde MaWenerma
VSOG
00 Fee.
AcINe
954 Td Adorn T
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Valdde Makderawe
VSOG
U OI
Active
11321N. Sar R -Ado Citonanaling
2809 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde Maintenance,
VS2G
100 Fit.
AcINe
11321N. Ser R -Aulo Dismanallne
2800 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde Mameranoa
VSOG
JLjad Add Batteries
AcINa
1132 N. Su Rac,,cfiry • Arlo Disinardeffro
2809Dodd Rd.
Eagan
VeNde Manderarce
VSOG
IMpIrme
Active
11321N. Ser Fectclkv - Auto Dianantefing
2009 Dodd Rd
Eagen
Vatwe Mabaaranee
VSOG
swlldms
Acute
1132 N. Star R d - Auto Dbirnarlettrig
2808 Dodd Rd
EaW
Vahkla Meirdemnoa
VSOG
On
Acute
It3glGromteMankyelm
-
. 3187 Red Oak Or
Eagan
VeNde McWerswe
VSOG
O Fater
Acute
1139 GrsB,e Monk'- Ine
3191Red Oak Or
Eagan
VeNde McNerence
VSOG
PAIII, Washer SONent
Active
1156 Pm Siop Truck Service
2815 Hvvy 55
Ea an
Vehlda Maiidermnce
VSOG
FI m,cwdnpe Lprnpe
P iv.
1158 Pro Stpp Truck Servbe
2815 55
Eagan
VaNcle Manenanee
VSOG
Ukd OIMN0
1168 Pro Ser Tmck Service
2815 55
Eagan
Vehkh Makeerence
V
F11m
Active
11 Pro Tnck Sovke
2816 65
Eapen
Vehida McWenenro
VSOG
,101 Snberds
AcWa
11 Pros Trwk Service
2816 65
Eagan
VeMde Mebaerarroa
VS3G
U 00
IftIVI.
1248 V.IwAWcR-palr
6689 S Robert Tr
Inver Gruva Hal hs
Environmental Review
Lone Oak Business Park, Eagan - 7October 9, 2006
W'TYPE ••••
SIZE
WASTE
GENERATORe GENERATOR
STE ADDRESS
city
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
OI Flt.
1246 Vous Aub Repair
8889 S Robed Tr
Inver Grove Heights
Vehicle Malraarence
VSQG
Le Acid Belled.
1246 Value Ado Ir
6889 S Robed Tr
Inver Grove Heights
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Washer Schram
1246 Value Auto r
B889 S Robert Tr
Inver Grove hle
Vehicle Memonarm
VSOG
Washer
1283 Minnesota Coaches;
2815 56 Bulb B
Eaw
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Acid Batteries
FAC�.
1 Minnesota Coach=
28758 55 sidleB
an
Vehicle Mebee.nce
VSOG
Fl
1293 Mbuesola Candles
2815 H 55 su8e 8
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
o0
1293 Minnesota Coodwe
2615 H 65 state B
Eagan
Vehicle MaMemnce
- VSQG
O Fibers
Active
1283 Mknesata Coedes
2815 65 suite B
Eagan
Mwaded
VSQG
Fl nonwdM
13305 le ler. Inc.
809 tla Rd
E
Mrs ubd
VSOG
U 01
1330 S _ la. Inc.
BOB Apollo Rd
Eagan
Maredecturing
VSOG
01 Barbells
Active
1330 Sinji,42ty Systeans Inc.
BOB Apollo Rd
Ea an
Monlifacitiang
VSQG
ILelidAcIdUatterhas
Active
1330 Sihems Inc.
909 Apollo Rd
n
Manufacturing
VSOG
111drannable, Solvents
Active
1330 Sing System Inc.
009 ApolloRd
Eagan
Mouxlessurby
VSOG
1pduwasher
Active
1330 Single.Ply System Inc.
ON ApolloR4
Eagan
Maedact
VSOG
[CrAorketted Solvents
Active
1330 SIMIN44y System 1.
909 Apollo Rd
Eagan
Marcilacturing
VSOG
IGA3 Absokads
Acute
1330 S s hems Inc.
909 Apollo Rd
Eagan
Moruffacturing
VSOG
1011 Filers
Active
1330 S lane Inc.
908 Apolo Rd
an
VeNW Maintenance
VSOG
IftneWasherSolvent
Acute
1354 Stock Lumber Ire.
915 Yankee Doodle Road
Eaen'
Vehicle MaMerance
VSOG
AdUfteeze
Active
1354 Sock Lumber Inc.
916 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan
VeMde Maintenance
VSQG
Active
1351 Sack Lumber Inc
915 Yankee Doodle Rated
Eagan
VeMde Maintenance
VSQG
ON
Active
1354 Sad Lumber. Inc
815 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan
Vehicle MaWenenw
VSQG
Active
13645tod Lumber ire.
915Yankee Doodle Reed
an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
atteries
Active
1354 Block Lumber Ina
915 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan
Vehicle Makde.nce
MUG
rSolV di
Inactive
1364 Vel MdorS da •
2815 Dodd Road Sim 102
Ea en
Vehicle Mamenance
MQG
VL4adAcIdBaUedw
MNe
1364 Vd Mdor
2615 Dodd Road Sae 102
Eagan
VeMde Mabderrnce
MQG
Active
1364 V MoW
2815 Dodd Road SAW 102
an
VeMde Mainlensrwa
MOO
Wesher Sud a
MNe
384 Vel Motor s
2816 Dodd Road Suite102
Eager,
VeMde McMemree
VSQGer
Solvent
Active
1375 Penske Tried, La. Co. LP.
965 Aldrin Or
Ea n
Vehicle Mainlerance
VSOG
alled.
Active
1375 Pens a Tt Lw Co. LP.
965 Aldan Dr
n
Vehicle Mdmerance
VSOG
-
Active
1375 Penske Truck Lowest Co. LP.
806 Aldan Dr
Eagan
Vehicle MaWenree
VSOG
ON Ruse
Active
13751 Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP.
965 Aldan Or
Eagan
Vehicle Mektaaance
VSOG
thead OI
Active
1376Pe.he TNckt. Co. LP.
985 Aldan Or
Eaan
Vehicle MaHensnce
VS3GFl
reecent
Active
1375 Penske Trial, Leasing Co. L.P.
865 Aldan Or
an
Vehicle Maintenance
ds Wwtw
I.dtve
14461Hoccesdol. Ina
920 Aiddn Drive
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
Led Add Bananas
Active
144 Howeslo Inc.
920 Aldan Days
an
Vehcle Maintenance
VSQG
Otl
Active
1445 Hoomstat Inc.
920 Alddn Dew
Eagan
Vehicle Mabee.ree
VS2GO
FRm
Active
1445 Hoovedo Inc.
920 Alddn Dave
Ea an
Vehide Maintenance
VSQG
reacent Lanes,
Active
/445 Hoov.ld Ina
920 Aldrin Dave
Eg.
VeNtle Main.
VSOG
Aburrieze
Active
1445 Hasawmi, Ina
820 Aldan Drive
Eagan
Vehicle Meme.res,
VSOG
River Washer - Systownt
Active
1445 HoowistoL Inc.
920 AIddn Dew
Eanalt
E ui"rd Repair
MOO
/Adhesive
Active
1464IKON OMce Scald.
915 Blue Gamlen Road
an
d d Repair
MOG
end
Active
1464 IKON Office S.W.
915 BluGalen Road
Eagan
E md Repair
MOG
ed hear all
Active
1464 IKON Offew Sokdlons
915BluGentanRoad
False
VSQG
dWasher
Active
1468 Asaodaed Material Hand4
roo
85 81m, Denim Road -Efi
n
Rated
VSOG
01
helve
468 Associated MalerW HandO
835 She, Genian Road
Rel
VSOG
M
1488 Associated Materal Handling
935 Bear Gentn Road
n
Rela/
SOO
wrecent La
Acte
1488 A.acated Metered Handl
9Ble Golden Road
an
Rake
VSOG
Oil Barbara,
Active
14 Associated MaNdal Heading035
Bus Gentian Read
an
Relel
VSQG
L Acid Belleri.
Active
1468 Associated Material Head)
935 Bloa Genian Road
an
E d nt Re ir
VS]G
ree
I.
1477 Philippi E mem G
2875 H 55
en
mad tr
VSQG
01
Active
1477 d d
2075 X hwa 55
Eenn
E tdmend Rome
VSOG
I FIRM
Active
1477 Phil E uiroam Cam
2875 Aw55Eagan
d md Re
VSOG
ed OI Sorbed
Active
u77 Philippi d mem
2875 H Na 55
n
E .MR
VSOG
Washer Solved
Active
1477 PN I met C
28758 55
Eagan
E d mem Repair
VSQG
wresecent/Me Les
Ate
1477 Phi I E d d C
2875 H 65
Eagan
E d Repair
VSQG
L Add Batteries
1477 Philippi Egtipmrs
2875 H 55
Eagan
Eindinnert Repair
VSOG
POW Thinner
M
7I E tdmad Co
4527Rli
2675 Ice 55
Eagan
p
E d md Repair
VSOG
ed 08
BA
Fischer T
2815 Hear 55
d rhea R
VSOG
OI Fliers
M Ne
1621 Bob Flesher T
2875 65
an
d Re
VSOG .
Active I
1521113obFisducTrucking
12815 Hn 55
Eagan
Environmenklow • •
Lona Oak Bus nose Park, Eagan - EfiW
October 6, 2006
HadWaste Genestos
TYPE
SIZE
I I WASTE
STATUS
GENERATOR} GENERATOR
SITE ADDRESS
city
inent Repair
VSOG
1011 Sorberde
Active
1521 Bob Fleenor Truck
2815 55
Eagan
invot Repay
Wesher SoivOM
Active
1621 Bob Fischer Truck
2816 55
W Repair
Lead Acid Enter.
Active
1521 Bob Fischer Tedu
2815 55
Equipsourf Ra
Fl cent
Active
1521 Bob Fischer T
2815 %
Eamn
BMHI Moslem.
Wiled OU
ActNa
1608 Sehodlw Elevaer Co
876 Sias Gordian
an
Build) Melntarence
OI Sorbents
Active
1608 Sehudler Elevelor Co .
875 Blue Gordian
n
Bidding; Mabderence
G
fl M Le
Active
i SeNndlerElevator cam.
875 Blue Gordian
Eagan
Gu idowererce
G
M
Active
1608 SddntllerElovalor
875 Blue GOMkm
Ellison
Equipireve Repair
G
Fl
Active
181 Fisher SM Ca
885 Ellie Gentlen Rd.
E -Man
ul R
G
G Clnsner
ACINe
161 FhdmrSiaCo.
396 Blue Gentian RQ
Ee nEcpjlpw.M
Re
G
rtswasherSdvaM
AdNe
181 Fisher SM Co.
895 Slue Gerdlen Rd.
EaganE
uimere Re ao
IVSQG
G
nsWasher- ueohe
Active
181 Fisher Sia Co.
896 glue German Rtl.
EaganMa"ad
er
Active
181 Great Western Chemical Co .
817 Lane Oak Rd. Sole 100
EdisonMerndacl
Ndo Acid
Active
181 Great Western Chemical Co.
817 Lone Oak Rd. Suss 100
EMMVeMde
Maintenance
G
WaalwSoWerd
AdWe
181 T 21 Ire
92D All
EwnManures
G
Fl
Active
ISM HRI North Amerke
900 bRd.
Ee n
Manufas
G
Prins Washer Solvent
Active
1631 HPII NorthMnerlea
900 Ib Rd.
an
G
Fads
Active
1831 HRI NonhARsrka
800 to Rd.
Eaan
Mentes
G
V OI
AdNe
1631 HRH Norm America
900 %Rd.
Ea n
Meadq
G
O Sebents
Active
1631 HRI Nord America
800 b Rd.EaganMamdq
G
Bdllesle
Active
16311HRINoMMrerica
800 Apolip Rd.
Manufacturing
VSOG
Industrial Fleas
Active
1631HRI Nord Amerlce
900 Apollo Rd.
Eumn
BUIdIM Mauderares
VSQG
Fl mmeble Gash
Active
1632IRoadvial, EWM, Ina
2050 Lore Oak Circle
Eamn
Buildim Maintenance
VSQG
sold
Inactive
iWRoadway Express. Inc
2850 Lore Oak Coda
Eagedr,
Buildinit Maintenance
VSOG
Add BeBerles
Active
1632 Roe Express, ins
2950 Lore Oak Ctrds
Eagan
Bsb - Maddereree
VSOG
tds Llquwa
Ad Ns
1632 Roadway Equess, Arc
29W Lore Oak Circle
Eagan
Bullding Metrderenee
VSOG
Flcant Lasses,
Active
1632 R,,dm Inc.
2950 Lone Oak Circle
Ea
Bullift Malnlernew,
VSQG
rid
AMNO
1632 Roadmy Espresso, Inc.
2950 Lone Oak Cede
Eagen
Vehicle Maintenance
MQG
PdM1s Washer
AcMe
1633 Truck Service Center
205011 Oak. Cud.
Eagan
Vehicle Mairmnerce
MOG
Uied OB
ACMe
1633 Truck SeMce Corder
2050 Laren Oak. Code
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
MOG
00 Fliers
Ache
1 M3 Truck Service Corder
2950 Lore Oaks Code
Eagan
VeMde Meodarence
MOG
ONS dmm -
Active
ISM Truck SeMce Cenler
2950 Lore Oske Circle
Eagan
Vehicle Metrdarerce
MOG
Liked Acid Batteries
hive
1833 Thick Service Center
2050 Lane Oaks Code
Estser,
Vehicle Maintenance
MOG
Addireass,
Active
ISM Truck Sentra Corder
2850 Lore Oaks Ckds
Eamn
Vehicle Maintenance
MOO -
Uded OI
Active
7670 NOM Ste Dlesel
837 Apollo Rd.
Eagan
Venda Maintenance
MQG
O FROM
Active
1670 North SterDladd
837 Apolls Rd.
Eagan
Vehicle Maodemrce
MOG
FlLormcaM III
Acte
1670 NoM Sler Diesel
837 Ib Rd.
Eagan
VehiW MaMenarca
MQG
Militarize
Active
167014oMSler Dlesel
837 Apono Rd.
Vehicle Maintenance
MOG
Ldad Add Batteries
Active
ISM NmIh SW Diesel
837 APOUD Rd.
Eadian
Vehicle Maintenance
MQG
pdd Washer -Cuda
ASW,
1670 North Sler Clesel
837 ApolloRd.
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
1PArts Washer Solvent
Active
1 Transport international Pool Inc.
3165 Dodd Rd
Easan
VeMde Maintenance
U On
Active
1 Tre n International Pool Inc.
3165 Dodd Rd.
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
O Fllee
Active
low Transport Intemstbrrel Pool Inc.
3165 Dodd Rd.
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
L Add galleries
Active
1680 T A InlertsUeal Pool Inc-
3165 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Vehicle McMenance
I Funs
Iredlve
1 T Irtlena0onal Pod bra
3185 Dodd Rd.
EUMBulb
Manse a ce
b Palo
A.dNe
low Trod Lone Oak Lutheran School
2850 55
n
:VSCQIG
Film
Act"
1713 Fln11 LMs Inc.
2700 glue Water Rend SMle 450
n
PrWI
rScII
ActNe
1713 F1s11 on IDUs Ina
2700 Elm Water Road SMle 450
Ea
PNiti
Fl rd Subs
hdNe
1713 First i rescon Me Inc.
2700 glue Water Rood Suite 450
Ea an
PrMI
Pdris Solved
Active
171 Flsll nLlhoInc.
2700 One Weler Road Suite 460
Ea en
PrYUI
A.ct"
171 Fistl mesion Llho Inc.
2700 BlueWater Road SuMe 450
Ee
Prodi
I
Active
171 First) Lkhu Inc.
2700 Elm Water Rmd Sudle460
Printing -
VSQG
a.
Active
1713 Flat hrouression Litho Inc.
27W Blue Water Road Suite 450
Prinilm
VSOG
P4= Wash
Active
1713 First l eselon Live Inc.
2700 Sim Water Road Suite 450
PrWIng
VSOG •
Fdtmlein Sulu on
Inacllve
1713 Fist finpression Leho Inc.
2700 Blue Water Road. Sulo 450
Edison
Photography
MOG
M Film
Active,
1734 Reylval Consocelo.
930 Blue Gentian Road Suite 1000
an
Ret a
MOG
Sdulbn
Active
1734 R Co lion
930 Blue Gordian Road SWI. 1000
Ee sn
Rot
VSOG
kerSokdion
A<1Ne.
1744 Won
2880 Comnxre Dr. Suite 600
En
Phot
VSOG
Solution
Ac1Ne
1744 Lacon
298D Commers Or. Sive 800
Ea an
Photography
VSQG
IN ascent La
Active
1741 Union
2980 Commons Dc Suite 600
11
j
Environmental Review
Lone Oak Bowness Park,: Eagan -W
October S. 2006
Na: Waste Gumm..
TYPE
SIZE
1
I
WASTE
TUS GENERATORi GENERATOR
SITEADDRESS
City
Photography
VSOG
Fln,
1749 Lason
2980 Common, Dr.SW1e 800
Eagan
Manned
VSOG
Ua
01
17 IOK Mhuraeola
880 a Rd.
en
Mended
Maadecl
VSOG
VSOG
Fl nM Buena
011 Ilea
'
1 KIK Mlnaeda
1) KIK Mkmeada
990 lo Rd.
990 loRd.
en
EsuanVSOG
Pe
Washer
17 MK Mbmesota
990 b Rd.
Ee n
VeNde Maintenance
MOG
U
OB
1778 Pre Sto
850 Lone Oak Rd.
Ea n
VeNde Maintenance
MQG
U
Ol FRea
1778 Ro Sia
850 Lam Oak Rd.
EagartVehicle
Mekdenance
VeNde Mabdenance
Maldanance
MOG
VSQG
VSW
VSOG
Fl
Re
cent
00
OB FRere
e
e
I
1778 Pre30
1815 BobFbchsrT
. 7875 BobFadesT
1875 Bob Factor T
850 Lam Oak Rd.
3110 M/a Colba Dr.
3110MaeCd lY Dr.
3110 MOa Contra Dr.
Ea n
an
EaMowers.
EacenMaideranee
VSOG
OII
rbank
e
1815 Bob Fkdr lr
3110 Mke Collm Dr.
E n
Makaenance
VSOG
Pa
WesMr SoMd
e
Fact rT
3110 Mke CoNre Dr.
an
Malreamme
VSOG
L
PCN Ballenin
e
FkctarT
3110 MOs CoOhw Dr.
Ea an
Matrexance
VSOG
Fl
e
FkctarT
3170MkeCo0beDr.
Eagene
E aCrea Ina
it3prbd�
82D Oo SWe tOD
Eagan
dwi -
VSOG
adNml
e
Fd.. CraaO Ina
920 Rd Suite 100
Eapart
MenWedud -
VSOG
T
N Daveio r
PCINe
Nrere LLC
2935 Walare Rd.SWIe 180
EMM
Mewled
VSOG
I
Almlal
PClive
were LLC
2835 Waters Rd,Suite 180
Eagan
ManWad
VSOG
t Bnards
MNe
19LLC
2835 Walere Rtl, SWe 180
MarKftdUrUV
M"act
VSOG
Solulbn
Film
Alae
Ne1932
1934PrInIvave LLC
Pddwere LLC -
2935 Waters Rd Sure 160
2935 Waters Rd Suite 180
Espan
E.
ManWad
VSOG
Fl
reaced Bulbs
Ac1Ne
1932 Prinlwere LLC
2835 Wft%M Rtl SWw 160
n
Manacled
Mond
VSW
VSOG
EI
Nce
d
MNe
Inactiva
193 Prbdware LLC
1932 Printware LLC
2935 Waters Rd Suite 160
2935 Waters Rd Sule 180
an
Ea
Printing
PrMi
VSOG
VSOG
Fl
wash
lirrma.
MNe
PCI'.
1987 night LLC
1961 Copy RI N LLC
3177 Dodd Rd
3177 Dodd Rd
Ea
Ea an
P"M
PSI
VSOG
Ac81
A.E.ia
Ca RI N LLC
1951 Copy Right.
3177 Dodd Rd
3177 Dodd Rd
an
En n
RMI
Werehotse
VSOG
MOG
Chord®b
Wd
Active
Inactive
7981 Copy Rigid LLC
IjR I&dpWCo. APC -
3177 Dodd Rd
850 Apoln Rd Salle 780
Eman
Ee
•
••
0
October 10, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Eagan
3 83 0 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Wescott Road Street Revitalization
City Project No. 943
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Attached is our report for the Wescott Road, Pilot knob Road to Denmark Avenue, Street
Revitalization, City Project No. 943. The report presents and discusses the proposed
improvements and includes a cost estimate, preliminary assessment roll and schedule.
We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and
discuss the contents of this report.
Sincerely,
John P. Gorder, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
I hereby certify that this report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
John P. Gorder
Date: Reg. No. 22813
Reviewed By:
Dept. of Public Works Date:
Reviewed By:
Finance Dept.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of Transmittal/Certification
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction.......................................................................................................I
Scope................................................................................................................. 2
Feasibilityand Recommendations..............................................................................3
Street Evaluation.................................................................................................. 3
ProposedImprovements......................................................................................:...4
Easements/Permits................................................................................................ 6
CostEstimate...................................................................................................... 6
Assessments........................................................................................................ 6
Low Density Residential............................................................................... 7
Assessment Financing Options..............,................................................................... 7
RevenueSource .................... :.............................................................................. 8
ProjectSchedule....................................................................................................8
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Appendix B
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Appendix C
Figures - 1
- 2A &B
- 3
Location Map
Street Improvement/Assessment Area Map
Typical Section — Overlay
Based on the data and engineering strategies available at this time, the City's current PMP
incorporates local and ongoing maintenance strategies with seal coating occurring as needed at 5
to 7 years, again at 12 to 14 years with a bituminous overlay at approximately 20 years.
Overlaying these roadways located within the project area, which are mainly in the 20 to 25 year
time frame, will prevent further decay of the pavement surface, thus protecting and extending the
structural life of the street.
Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous patching, crack sealing and seal coating have
occurred at appropriate intervals during the life of the street pavements. The street in the
neighborhood was crack sealed in 1990 and then seal coated in 2000.
The Public Works maintenance program typically includes patching and refurbishing during the
construction season prior to the overlay. The Public Works crews, as part of the Preparatory
Pavement Management Plan, removed and replaced deteriorated pavement areas and placed
leveling and maintenance overlays on portions of the streets under consideration, if necessary.
These repairs alone will not substantially extend the life expectancy of the street pavements if
not combined with the proposed structural bituminous overlay proposed with this project.
The Public Works Department has also inspected the utility infrastructure (sanitary sewer, water
main, and storm sewer) in the project area and determined the system is in good working order
and that no major repairs are necessary.
Scone
This project provides for resurfacing (edge mill and overlay) approximately 0.45 miles of
Wescott Road. Figure 2, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project area.
Included in this project is the replacement of the damaged curb and gutter, adjustments and/or
replacement to sanitary/storm sewer utility castings, water gate valves, street signage, and
pedestrian ramps.
Wescott Road
Page 2
Feasibility and Recommendations
This project is necessary to prevent further decay of the pavement section, create a safer driving
surface, increase ride -ability and add structural strength.
This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement (resurfacing) is considerably less
expensive than complete reconstruction of this street.
This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint in that this type of improvement has been
used successfully to extend the life expectancy of numerous other streets throughout the City and
the region.
This project is in accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (2007 – 2011) for the
City of Eagan and the schedule as outlined in the Pavement Management Program. It is
recommended that the project be constructed as proposed in this report in conjunction with other
similar projects throughout the City.
Street Evaluation
The City of Eagan's Pavement Management System allows the City to evaluate the condition of
the existing street surface to help schedule timely maintenance and improvements. The
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition for each street. The general
categories that define PCI rankings are as follows:
PCI Recommended Improvement
56 - 100 Routine Maintenance/Crack Seal/Seal Coat
36 _-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay
FO -3-5 Reconstruct
The 2006 PCI ranking for this portion of Westcott Road has an average pavement condition
rating of *45* which falls in the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" category. Therefore, with the
rating and the age of the street, the 2007 construction season is the optimal time to construct the
bituminous overlay.
Wescott Road
Page 3
Proposed Improvements
Pavement - The proposed street improvements are shown in
Figure 3. The existing street section consists of 4 1/2"
bituminous pavement supported by 10" gravel base and
granular sub grade material. The existing bituminous
surface will be milled adjacent to the existing curb and
gutter (6'-8' wide) to accommodate a 1'/s -inch bituminous
overlay. The overlay, combined with the existing street
section, will provide a street section consistent with current City standards for a residential street.
The combination of patching, and overlay will not eliminate cracking due to the temperature
extremes experienced in Minnesota. Bituminous overlays will show some continued frost
movements and reflective cracking consistent with,the underlying pavement. Routine
maintenance will still need to continue under the City's Pavement Management Program.
Concrete curb & gutter - Damaged curb and gutter will be
severely cracked,
spalled, or settled. It is estimated that approximately 6% of the existing concrete curb and gutter
will have to be replaced. Boulevard sod will be removed and replaced by a new 2' wide roll
behind each section of curb and gutter that is replaced. While the contractor who performs the
work is responsible for it's establishment in the fust 30 days after placement, adjacent residents
are encouraged to consistently water the new sod to help ensure its growth. A guide to
maintenance of the sod will be distributed to the residents prior to this construction activity.
Wescott Road
Page 4
J �
'y � Y iJ.i r '. ':.
4; _
�. � i 111 �I I I I.'_ _.
i.:
Easement/Permits
All work will be in the public right-of-way. No additional easements will be necessary. It is
anticipated that no permits will be required for the resurfacing project.
Wescott Road is a municipal state aid collector route, and therefore, Minnesota Department of
Transportation State Aid plan approval of construction plans will be required.
Cost Estimate
Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A.. The estimates are based on anticipated 2007
construction costs and include a 5% contingency and indirect cost of 30%, which include legal,
administration, engineering, and bond interest. A summary of the costs is as follows:
• Edge Mill and Overlay w/ signage costs $,102,640
• Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 21,280
Total Cost $1231920
Assessments
Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties for the total improvement
with costs allocated in accordance with the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for a mill
and overlay improvement for local streets. All assessments will be revised based on final costs.
A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B.
Wescott Road
Page 6
City Special Assessment Policy
Assessment Ratio
Property City
Mill and Overlay w/ Signage Costs
• Public Facility 50% 50%
Repair Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 0% 100%
Public Facility - All public facility properties (Dakota County -Wescott Library & City
Municipal Center) having direct access on to Wescott Road are proposed to be assessed, based
on the amount of front footage adjacent to the street within the project area. The City's
Assessment Policy states that 75% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for these
properties. The estimated cost per front foot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy
is $19.26/ Front Foot and is calculated as follows:
1) % Public Facility =1,233 ff. / 4,086 (total ff.) = 30.2%
2) [$123,920 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 75% x 30.2% x 44/52] = $23,750 [Total Public
Facility Assessment]
3) $23.750 (Total Public Facility Assessment) 4 $19.26/ F.F.
1,233 Public Facility F.F.
Assessment Financing Options
The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full
assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is
included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over five years with the
interest determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements. The
following payment schedule will result based on an estimated 5.5% interest for the assessed
amounts:
Per $1,000 Assessment
Wescott Road
Page 7
Principal
Per Year
Interest
Per Year
Cost
Per Year
First Year
$200
$55
$255
Fifth Year
$200
$11
$211
Wescott Road
Page 7
Revenue Source
A summary of revenue sources is listed below:
The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $100,180 (80.8% of
total), and the City's property assessment of $11,050.
Proiect Schedule
Present Feasibility Report to City Council/
Order Public Hearing....................:.....................................October 17, 2006
Public Hearing......................................................................November 21, 2006
MnDOT — Approval of Plans and Specifications ........................................... January, 2007
City Council — Approval of Plans and Specifications .................................... January, 2007
Award Contract............................................................................. February, 2007
Project Completion.............................................................................August 1, 2007
Final Cost Report .......................................................................... September, 2007
Final Assessment Hearing..................................................................................... Fall, 2007
First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement..................................May 15, 2008
Wescott Road
Page 8
Project Cost
Property Assessment
City Contribution
Mill and Overlay w/
Signa&e
$102,640
$23,740
($78,900)
Repair Existing Curb
$21,280
-0-
($21,280)
Totals
$ 123,920
$23,740
$100,180
The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $100,180 (80.8% of
total), and the City's property assessment of $11,050.
Proiect Schedule
Present Feasibility Report to City Council/
Order Public Hearing....................:.....................................October 17, 2006
Public Hearing......................................................................November 21, 2006
MnDOT — Approval of Plans and Specifications ........................................... January, 2007
City Council — Approval of Plans and Specifications .................................... January, 2007
Award Contract............................................................................. February, 2007
Project Completion.............................................................................August 1, 2007
Final Cost Report .......................................................................... September, 2007
Final Assessment Hearing..................................................................................... Fall, 2007
First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement..................................May 15, 2008
Wescott Road
Page 8
Appendix A -Street Overlay - City Project No. 943
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Wescott Road
Rituminous Street Overlav
Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Price
Est.
Cost
Mobilization
L.S.
1
$2,500.00
$2,500
Mill Bituminous Pavement
S.Y.
3200
$1.25
$4,000
Type 2350/60 Wear Course Mixture
Ton
1300
$40.00
$52,000
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal.
660
$1.50
$990
Replace Traffic & Street Signs
L.S.
1
$4,500.00
$4,500
4 -Inch White Striping
L.F.
4,800
$0.50
$2,400
4 -Inch Double Yellow Striping
L.F.
4,800
1 $1.00
$4,800
12 -Inch Yellow Striping
L.F.
1,000
$2,000
$2,000
Traffic Control
L.S.
1
$2,000.00
$2,000
Subtotal
$75,190
+5%
Contingencies
$3,760
Subtotal
$78+950
+30%
Indirect Costs
$23,690
TOTAL
$102,640
Repair Existing Concrete Curb &
Gutter
Item
Unit
Est.
Q .
Unit
Price
Est.
Cost
Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
L.F.
300
$6.00
$1,800
B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter
L.F.
300
$16.00
$4,800
7" Concrete Valley Gutter
S.Y.
130
$50.00
$6,500
Adjust Frame & Ring Casting C.B)
Each
4
$200.00
$800
Sod w/To soil
S.Y.
80
$10.00
$800
Bituminous Driveway Patching
S.Y.
1 20
$24.00
$480
4" Concrete Ped Ramp w/ Wet Cast for
Truncated Dome Inset
S.F.
90
$4.50
$410
Subtotal
$15,590
+5%
Contingencies
$780
Subtotal
$16,370
+ 30% Indirect Costs
$4,910
Total Curb & Gutter I $21,2801
TOTAL PROJECT COST $123,920
e 0
-4
-fit.
14606b
Ro
Appendix B - City Project No. 943
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Wescott Road
Street Overlay
Parcel (Public Facility)
P.I.N.
Front
Rate
Footage
/ F.F
Total
Ted Wachter Addition
(City Municipal Center
10-75300-010-01
574
$19.26
$11,050
1340 WESCOTT RD
Dakota Coimty Lib
10-75300-020-01
659
$19.26
$12,690
Totals
1,233
1$23,740
Wescott Road Street Improvement Fig.1
City of Eaan Location Map - Project 943
Engineer ng Department
Executive Summary
Introduction
Eagan's natural character is defined in large part by water. From the City's northwest
boundary formed by the Minnesota River to the pristine wetlands and small lakes of
Lebanon Hills Regional Park in the southern portion of the community, the City has
celebrated its abundance of water resources as an integral part of the quality of life it
offers residents and visitors. Emblematic of the special regard the community has felt
for its water was the adoption of the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan in 1990, the
first community—wide plan in the state aimed specifically at protecting the quality of
lakes. From this award winning plan in 1990, the City developed a program that was
recognized in 1996 with a 1st place national award by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. And the City's residents have taken up the banner. In a scientific survey of
residents conducted in 2005, 99% indicated that good water quality was very or
somewhat important to them.
Much has been accomplished. Despite a 40% increase in the City's population and the
addition of thousands of acres of development since 1990, water quality in the City's top
seven recreational lakes has stayed the same or improved over that time period. The
City has installed boat landings, trails, and fishing piers to improve public access. A
quality sport fishery has developed in many of the City's lakes, and the City has active
control programs for aquatic invasive species. Finally, Eagan residents are well-educated
on water quality issues, thanks in part to communication initiatives by the City.
But more needs to be done. Some City lakes will not meet new water quality standards
mandated by state and federal regulations. City staff are shouldering additional
responsibilities to meet new regional, state and federal mandates for urban stormwater
and wetlands management. Finally, our understanding ofhow aquatic and wetland
systems function is improving continually and the tools to manage those systems are
evolving. These changes must be tracked, evaluated, and incorporated as appropriate in
the City's approach to managing its water resources.
City of Eagan i
ater Quadty Management Plan—Agency Review Draft Project 49-05-132
The Process
To help meet these challenges, the City Council in 2005 established a 13 -member Water
Quality Task Force to guide the development of the upgraded Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP). The Task Force represented a range of technical and policy
experts, agency staff familiar with the community, and local citizens, including two City
Council members. Between October 2005 and August 2006, the Task Force met eight
times to provide input on important aspects of the plan, particularly regarding goals and
policies, lake and wetland classification and management standards, establishment of
management priorities, and the overall program for system improvements.
The WQMP that came out of this process gives the City the tools it needs to continue its
progressive leadership in municipal water resources management and propel its "state
of the art" program into the 216t Century. A major challenge is to implement this plan in
a cost-effective way while acknowledging ever increasing demands for limited financial
resources. In a phrase, 'limited resources, smartly applied" describes the approach
desired by the Task Force to achieving the goals of the Plan.'
Existing System
One of the major challenges of water resources protection and improvement in a nearly
fully developed community like Eagan is dealing with the effects of the existing storm
drainage infrastructure. A series of comprehensive storm drainage planning efforts in
the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s allowed Eagan to develop into the eighth largest City in
Minnesota. These efforts were made during a time when flood protection was the order
of the day across the nation and when the impacts of stormwater runoff on water quality
were barely recognized.
Current water quality issues in many of the City's lakes and wetlands is directly related
to a largely irreversible system configuration that routes runoff from urbanized areas
through these water features. This is the starting point of this plan. The City must find
ways of making the stormwater system as water quality friendly as possible, including
decreasing the amount of stormwater entering the system where feasible. This requires
attention to "state of the art" thinking, both in the development of this WQMP and the
implementation of the program in the future.
City of Eagii
Watn ity manV,.ent Plan—AMcy Reoina Draft Project 49-05132
Other Players
When it comes to stormwater management and wetland protection, there are other
agencies with whom the City must interact and coordinate. Among the most significant
are:
■ Metropolitan Council. This regional planning agency has long focused
on stormwater quality improvement in municipalities. of the seven county
Metro area. Updated stormwater management plans for all communities
in the Metro area will be needed to support the community
comprehensive plan updates that are due in 2008.
■ Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). This agency oversees
administration of the state Wetlands Conservation Act by local
governments and must approve any local wetland management plan
developed by a local government. This revised Plan contains such a
wetlands plan for Eagan.
s Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). This agency has major
responsibilities in the management of designated public waters (of which
there are over 60 in Eagan), including development of public access,
fisheries management, and water level control.
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This agency has wide-ranging and
high profile regulatory, research, and planning responsibilities for
implementing the federal Total Maximum Daily Load (MDL) and
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs.
These programs are major justifications behind this Plan revision.
Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization (GCLWMO).
A local water management organization, the GCLWMO includes a
majority portion of Eagan as well as much smaller areas of Inver Grove
Heights and Mendota Heights. The City's revised Plan must be in
compliance with the WMO's plan.
City of Eagan
�VJater Qu icy Management Plan—Agency Rwiem Draft Project 49-05-132
Each of these agencies relies on the cooperation of local governments like Eagan to help
meet its mandates, though several have powerful regulatory authority as well. Many of
these organizations also offer technical and/or financial assistance that is of value to the
City. Representatives of all of the organizations above were included on the Water
Quality Task Force. Thus, this WQMP is the culmination of an effort that involved
experts at many levels of government to forge a re -vitalized strategy for water quality
and wetlands management tailored to Eagan's needs and desires.
Goals and Policies
The vision of the City s program is as follows:
The quality of lakes, wetlands, and streams in Eagan
meets or exceeds City, regional, state, and federal
requirements and community expectations.
The WQMP maps out a strategy to achieve this vision through a series of wide-ranging
goals and supporting policies that position the City for the next level of water quality
and wetland protection. The goals and some of the key supporting policies are
highlighted below:
1. Manage surface water resources using scientifically -based, common sense
approaches. Supporting policies include:
Managing lakes to achieve a clearwater condition with an abundant and
diverse native rooted aquatic plant community
Combining watershed control measures with in -lake management
measures
Managing high priority lakes according to individual lake management
plans
2. Control watershed loadings to help meet or exceed surface water quality
requirements. Reaching this goal will include:
■ Promoting compliance with statewide no -phosphorus fertilizer
regulations
s Continuing to implement a regular and targeted street sweeping program
■ Increasing awareness of, and enforce, the City's prohibition on dumping
into the storm drainage system
City ,Eagan iv
afn Qualt17 gemen!Plan-Agency Pe—D-- PrOed 4945-132
3. Protect surface water resources from impacts of land development and
re -development activities. This includes:
■ Requiring and enforcing construction site erosion and sediment control
for land development activities
■ . Requiring new development and re -development activities to incorporate
stormwater management features that meet strict performance standards
for treating and infiltrating runoff from their site
4. Manage wetlands in compliance with all regulations and according to
community's values and priorities. The wetland management strategies in
this WQMP exceed state requirements, which reflects the high priority the
community places on its wetland resources. Important elements include
protective buffers around certain wetlands and projects to enhance the
ecological diversity of some wetlands in public areas.
5. Foster citywide support for surface water management goals through an
active education program. Supporting policies include:
s Holding at least one community -wide forum per year to discuss water
quality and wetland protection issues
s Educating City staff to set a good example in the community for water
quality and wetland protection by the way they conduct their duties as
employees
■ Continuing and improving the City's education and outreach program to
engage citizens in water quality and wetland protection
Key Implementation Elements
The real measure of success of the upgraded WQMP will be its implementation.
A community -wide comprehensive plan like this one plays a valuable role in setting
standards for affected parties, identifying priorities, defining expectations, and
providing guidance and direction on key issues. Following is a brief summary of the
key implementation elements in this WQMP.
f City of Eagan o
afnQuality ManagemmtP n-Agmq Rmina Draft PWF- 49-05-132
4
Requirements for New and Re -Development
Activities
The increase in impervious cover associated with new and re -development activities is a
primary factor behind increases in surface runoff and pollutant loading to the City's .
lakes and wetlands. In the last two years, the MPCA has required cities to limit the total
amount of certain pollutants to no more than the pre -development condition of the site.
Based on both these factors, Eagan's Plan requires new development activity creating
more than th acre of new impervious surface to achieve the more restrictive of the
following:
■ no -net -increase in the amount of two key pollutants phosphorus and
suspended solids- compared to the pre -development condition or
■ an established removal of pollutants from stormwater
Similarly, re -development activities will be required to avoid any increase in pollutant
loading from the previous development condition.
Equally important, under most conditions, the City will require developers to infiltrate
runoff before it leaves sites of new and re -development activities. Compared to the.
traditional approaches of the 1990 plan, the new infiltration standards of this WQMP
could reduce runoff by 50 to 70 percent. These measures will enhance groundwater
recharge, decrease the burden on the stone drainage system, and minimize the pollutant
loads reaching high priority downstream waterbodies.
The City will provide guidance to developers to meet these requirements, but
developers will be responsible to incorporate into their site design such practices as are
necessary to meet the above performance standards. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site
treatment may be collected at the City's discretion where the City determines it is either
not desirable or not feasible to achieve the applicable performance standards within the
development or re -development site.
f City Q,Eagan vi
ate uality Egg:
tPlan — Agency Rmieu Draft- Project 4MS-132
NPDES and TMDL Requirements
In 2003, as part of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency began
requiring municipalities to obtain permits to discharge stormwater. In Minnesota, the
MPCA administers these permits under the NPDES MS4 program. The 5 -year NPDES
Permit obtained by the City in 2003 required preparation of a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and submission of an Annual Report. Each annual report
must summarize the following:
■ Compliance with permit conditions, including an assessment of the
appropriateness of identified management practices and progress
towards achieving identified measurable goals for six minimum control
measures
■ Planned stormwater management activities during the next reporting
cycle
■ Changes in identified management practices or measurable goals for any
of the control measures
As part of the revised NPDES permit program in 2005, the MPCA selected 30
municipalities most likely to have had expanded stormwater discharges to surface
waters since 1980. As one of the selected municipalities, Eagan is required to complete
additional work by October 1, 2007 to enable the MPCA to determine if the City has met
state rules for nondegradation of water quality. This additional work includes assessing
the increases of pollutant and discharge loads, writing a recovery and protection plan,
and modifying the City's SWPPP to include the assessment and plan.
Every two years, the federal Clean Water Act requires the states to publish an updated
list of streams and lakes that are not meeting their designated uses because of excess
pollutants. The Impaired Waters List—also known as the 303(d) list—is based on
violations of state water quality standards and is organized by river basin. For a surface
water to be listed, historical monitoring and. assessment must indicate it is impaired by
one or more pollutants.
� City of Eagan vii
afn Qua i!y Managcment Plan —Agmry Reoiera Draft Prgect 49-05-132
Once the MPCA assigns a surface water to the 303(d) list, it requires a detailed strategy
be developed and implemented within a specific time frame to meet water quality
standards. This strategy is commonly known as a Total Maximum Daily Load study or
plan (TMDL). A TMDL study identifies both point and nonpoint sources of each
pollutant that is causing impairment of a surface water. Water quality sampling and
computer modeling determine how much each pollutant must be reduced to assure the
water quality standard is met. Three Eagan lakes and the Minnesota River in Eagan are
on the 2006 Impaired Waters List.
The City will initiate its TMDLs in advance of the required start/complete dates of the
MnPCA). Generally, the City will take the lead to complete and implement TMDLs for .
impaired waters whose watersheds are located wholly within the City boundaries.
For impaired waters whose watersheds extend into adjacent communities, the City may
request the appropriate watershed management authority either to take the lead (with
the City participating as needed) or to co -facilitate the completion and implementation
of the TMDL. For TMDLs that have regional implications, the City will cooperate with
lead agencies (e.g., with the State of Minnesota for the Minnesota River). Part of this
involvement will be aimed at assuring due acknowledgment and consideration is
granted the City for its extensive efforts since 1990 to control urban nonpoint source
inputs to the impaired water. Impairment status of each of the City's priority lakes is an
important factor in establishing the prioritization system that will guide lake
managementefforts.
Local Wetland Management Plan
Wetlands provide a variety of services (called "functions") valued by the City and its
residents. Wetlands are a critical part of the natural storm drainage system in City of
Eagan, and help to maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion, provide food
and habitat for wildlife, and provide open spaces and natural landscapes that many
residents enjoy.
Included in the WQMP is a Local Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management
Plan (LCWPMP) that is customized to meet Eagan's needs. The main purpose of the
LCWPMP is to provide the framework for local wetland conservation regulations. The
goal is to prioritize and manage Eagan's wetlands based on the functions they perform
and their values to the community. Standards for protection and enhancement of
wetland resources included in the LCWPMP are prioritized on this basis. Because the
functions and values provided by different wetlands vary, the LCWPMP presents an
assessment and classification system that will assist the City in establishing priorities
and focusing available resources for wetland protection, enhancement and restoration.
Because all wetlands provide some functional values, all are protected to some degree.
City of Eagan viii
afa i YMnnagcwnt Plan-Arnry Rwkw Draft Pwied 49-05-132
The LCWPMP provides the following benefits:
■ Includes wetland inventory, assessment, and management guidelines
■ Streamlines City administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA)
by providing sequencing and varied replacement standards based on
the functional values of the wetland and resulting management
classifications
■ Allows appropriate use of wetlands to preserve water quality and
prevent downstream flooding
■ Enhances wildlife values of wetlands
■ Identifies potential wetland banking areas
■ Protects/restores wetlands and adjacent resources that are important for
interconnected green space
■ Manage wetlands by their sensitivity to stormwater
Regulation of activities that may impact individual wetlands will be based on
evaluations of proposed activities, site-specific wetland boundary delineations, and
wetland management classifications.
This section of the WQMP also contains information on an rare and sensitive wetlands
called calcareous fens. Calcareous fens occur only where specific characteristics of
landform, bedrock and groundwater favor their development. They support unique
plant communities with a number of rare species, and are highly susceptible to
degradation due to changes in hydrology or nutrient regime. Two fens - Nicols Meadow
and Ft. Snelling - lie within the jurisdictional boundaries of Eagan at the base of the
bluffs in the Minnesota River Valley. Both are in Ft. Snelling State Park but can be
affected by stormwater management activities within Eagan. The City intends to do its
part to protect these unique resources, and guidance for those protective measures are
outlined in the WQMP.
City of Eagan ix
afn Quality Management Plan —Agency Revco Draft Project 49-05-132
Priority Water Body Designation and
Management
Water quality in the City's recreational lakes has been a driving force behind Eagan's
water quality management efforts over the last 15 years. Through the WQMP upgrade
process, 30 priority lakes were identified (including six in Lebanon Hills Regional Park),
taking into account such factors as the size of, and public access to, the waterbody.
Protecting and managing water quality in these lakes is a primary objective of this
WQMP. As part of this strategy, the City has developed a customized lake classification
system with measurable water quality goals for each lake. When met, those goals will
assure that a specific lake will also meet proposed state standards as well as watershed
management organization requirements.
The City will manage its lakes to achieve a clear -water condition with a diverse
community of plants dominated by native emergent and submergent species.
Lake scientists acknowledge this condition as natural for lakes in this region of
Minnesota. A healthy assemblage of native plants minirnizes the likelihood that non-
native plants will become a problem. State water quality standards also support
achieving this condition.
The City recognizes lakes as complex systems whose responses to numerous natural and
unnatural variables are not clearly predictable. Therefore, it will employ an "adaptive
management" approach to these important community resources. Adaptive
management is an ongoing, science -based process of testing; monitoring and evaluating,
and then applying new knowledge to modify future policies, strategies, and practices
based on findings and the needs of the community. Furthermore, there are never
enough data to eliminate uncertainty. Adaptive lake management emphasizes assessing
the impacts of management actions to a reasonable extent and applying lessons learned
to guide future actions, as progress is made toward goals.
'The City's understanding of how lakes function as well as the development of tools to
manage lakes has improved dramatically since Eagan adopted its first water quality
management plan. If anything, these changes likely will accelerate over the next 10-15
years. The City staff must keep abreast of these developments and pursue those of merit
to achieve the goals in this WQMP.
Lakes are not the only priority surface waters in the City. Eagan also borders the
Minnesota River and contains two designated trout stream segments. The WQMP
contains approaches for protection of these resources.
City of Eagan x
ater Qaality Management Plan — agency Review Draft Prajeet 49-05-132
Public Education
Education serves an important role in enabling Eagan to implement its stormwater, lake
water quality, and wetland management programs successfully. The City's emphasis on
water resources education has put Eagan at the forefront of municipal education
programs in the state. Several of the tools now in common use across the state were
initiated or developed by the City. These include catch basin stenciling (first
implemented by the City in 1992) and writing and production of the children's
educational play Toadilly Turtle, through a joint effort between the City, Gun Club Lake
WMO, and CLIMB Theatre of Mendota Heights in 1993.
Five principles will guide the City's future efforts in water resources education, as
summarized briefly below:
1. The goal is to change the way people consider water resources. First,
change what people know, then the way they think, and finally the way they
act.
2. Allocate educational effort appropriately. In general, a base level of effort
will be applied everywhere in the community, but extra effort will be
directed in known "hot spots," areas with high loading risks to priority water
bodies.
3. Good public education generates and sustains program support. Water
resources education raises awareness of problems and offers opportunities to
show the City is solving those problems. These efforts also can foster
productive working partnerships with groups of interested citizens, which
can generate even more support and visibility for protection efforts.
4. Promote use to raise awareness. Efforts to increase the use and enjoyment of
the community s water resources help to increase support for taking care of
those resources.
5. Although important, public education is only a small part of solving water
quality problems. Fundamental alterations in drainage patterns and land
use in Eagan require technical solutions to be combined with public
education to achieve positive and effective results.
J City of Eagan xi
ext Quality Management Plan —Agency Review Dmft Projed 49-a5-132
Target audiences for the education program are:
■ City Staff. It is essential for the success of the program that City staff set
a good example to the community's residents, businesses, and customers
in carrying out their duties in a way that protects the City's water
resources consistent with the WQMP.
■ City Residents. The goal is that city residents be well educated about,
actively involved in, and regularly supportive of WQW policies and
programs.
■ The Development Community. It is important that City developers are
knowledgeable about and willingly partners with the City on WQMP
policies and programs.
Monitoring
To manage Eagan's lakes effectively, the City needs to know the quality of lakes relative
to their intended uses or criteria. Furthermore, actions the City takes to restore the
quality of lakes that do not meet intended uses or criteria need to be based on a practical
understanding of how watershed inputs and in -lake processes affect those lakes.
Eagan's monitoring program will focus predominantly—though not exclusively—on
collecting water quality data from priority lakes. The primary efforts will fall into one of
the three categories:
■ In -Lake monitoring. This is generally carried out by City staff during the
summer recreation season to track conditions in priority lakes.
■ Volunteer water clarity monitoring. Coordinated by City staff, this program
involves City residents in collecting data on lake water clarity and the
condition of a lake for recreational use.
■ Comprehensive monitoring for lake management plans. This effort, which
involves more detailed monitoring of in -lake conditions, also includes
looking at the characteristics of runoff discharged to the lake as well as
aquatic plant and fish communities and lake sediment characteristics.
The information generated will be the technical underpinning for
developing custom lake management plans for many of the designated
priority lakes.
#City of Eagan xii
WatnVUXUY Manog—fF -Agency R-ino Draft Pmjtt/99-05-132
Water Quality Improvement Program
The water quality improvement program in the WQMP provides an initial 5 -year
blueprint for actions or projects to carry out WQMP goals and policies. Such actions and
projects are important aspects of an upgraded "state of the art" water resources
management program because they build on Eagan's progressive leadership in
municipal water resources management.
The Improvement Program presented in the WQMP is organized into three groups of
projects:
■ General/Admnustrative;
® Lake Management, and
o Wetlands
Table 9.1 in the Plan summarizes high and medium priority water resources
management actions and projects on which the City will focus.
General/Administrative. These actions relate to development, evaluation, and revision
of ordinances and policies for land use that can have major impacts on water resources.
Examples include policies that affect the amount of impervious coverage on developed
parcels and how runoff from those impervious surfaces is handled. These improvements
also include citywide planning and study efforts that are required by other authorities,
such as the nondegradation provisions of the NPDES MS4 permit. ,
Lake Management. This WQMP identifies lake management plans as the best approach
to managing water quality in priority lakes. Lake management plans are detailed
feasibility studies for specific lakes that will evaluate the costs and benefits of
management alternatives and then provide specific costs and design guidance for
recommended capital improvements as well as non-structural management activities.
As part of implementing the overall lake management plans, the City will need to carry
out the capital improvement elements of those plans.
Management plans for eight priority lakes are programmed to be completed during the
2007-2011 time period. As the City completes successive plans, it will spend decreasing
amounts of time and effort developing plans and increasing levels of time and effort
implementing recommended measures in the plans. To reflect its future directions, the
City will update the 5 -year water quality improvement program each year.
f City'Eagan xiii
ate ityMnmgement Plan—Agency Review Draft Project 49-05-332
Within the scope of this WQMP, however, it is not possible to determine with certainty
the City's annual costs for this program. To a large extent, annual costs depend on
whether lake management plans are completed sooner or later than the programmed
schedule. Furthermore, until lake management plans are completed, the required time
and effort to implement each one remains unknown. Changes by the MnPCA in
designations to the Impaired Waters list could alter the priorities reflected in Table 9.1.
Thus, the City will evaluate the costs to complete the 5 -year schedule and to sustain
long-term implementation through its annual City operations budget process.
Wetlands. These activities reflect the City's intention to inventory and classify
wetlands systematically to protect wetlands appropriately and consistently with the
WQMF as well as to identify potential wetland banking/replacement sites in Eagan.
xivC--;f—ygM=9g tPlan —AgmryRwimDrat
Projed49-05-isz
AGENDA
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING
EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
October 17, 2006
6:30 P.M
L ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
P• EL ADOPT AGENDA (At approximately 8:00 p.m. the Council will take a short recess)
III. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
A. APPROVE MINUTES
•�f7 B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
P• �) C. APPROVE CHECK REGISTERS
P• �Z D. APPROVE Exempt Permit for Faithfirl Shepherd Catholic School to hold a raffle on January 27, 2007
E. APPROVE a Pigeon License for Eric Drenckhahn, 2811 Pilot Knob Road
p• 1(0 F. PRESENT Assessment Roll and Schedule Public Hearing (November 21, 2006) for Project 877 (Lexington Avenue,
Lone Oak Road to'TH 55 — Street Improvement)
P. n G. APPROVE Fuel Escalation Clause to Snow and Ice Control Contractual Agreements .
?.IS H. ACKNOWLEDGE Completion and Authorize City Maintenance of Project 04-itEvergreen Enclave
P R I. APPROVE Vacation of Right of Way — Gun Club Road and APPROVE Final Subdivision and Final Planned
Development for Red Pine Crossing (SE of Red Pine Lane / Highway 3 in SE '/4 of Section 36)
A613 J. APPROVE Final Planned Development and Final Subdivision for LoNidy
P. K. APPROVE Extension for Recording the Final Plat of Manley Commercial Addition
Z$ L. APPROVE Ordinance, Resolution and Development Agreement for the Establishment of Cedar Bluffs Housing
Improvement Area and Approval of the Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Fee
P. 4v M. APPROVE Short Term Lease Agreement for Community Action Council/Armfid of Love at the Cedarvale Mall
�• q? N. Item Removed
P. 5d O. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing (Nov 21, 2006) for Project 942 (Deerwood Drive — Street
Overlay)
P. Present Feasibility Report and Schedule Public Hearing (Nov 21, 2006) for Project 943 (Wescott Road —Street
Overlay)
P. Ojj. Q. Approve PIN clarifications to Final Assessment Rolls for Projects #926,927,932 & 933 (Street Overlays)
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
V. A. PROJECT 930, Final Assessment Hearing, Silver Bell Road (Nicoll Road —Kennebec Drive (Street Overlay
Improvements)
P• R(O B. PROJECT 931, Final Assessment Hearing, Art Rahn (Street Improvements)
VL OLD BUSINESS
Op 11*L A. MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — Best Brands (Lot 1, Block 1, Best Brands 2°d Addition)
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. RECEIVE DRAFT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN and Authorize Public Comment
t� B. RECEIVE AND AFFIRM WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT — Madelyn Woods located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff
Road in the NE'/4 of Section 32.
Q• C.. PRELIMINARY SUBDMSION — Madelyn Woods — A Preliminary Subdivision of 6.7 acres to create 8 single
family lots located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road in the NE'/4 of Section 32.
P. ID. LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) — City Of Eagan
VIII. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE
IX. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (There are no items at this time)
X. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
XI. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XII. CLOSED SESSION
XUL ADJOURNMENT
The.City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and
employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or
status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96
hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid.
City of Earn Ycuo
To: HONORABLE MAYOR & COUNCILMEMBERS
From: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
Date: OCTOBER 13, 2006
Subject: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 17, 2006 CITY COUNCIL MTG
ADOPT AGENDA
After approval is given to the October 17, 2006 City Council agenda, the following items are in
order for consideration.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in fiuther detail, those items should be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is
brief.
A. APPROVE NHNUTES
ACTION TO BE
To approve the minutes of the October 3, 2006 regular City Council meeting, as presented or
modified.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Minutes !e October 3, 2006 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages
through C�
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ® A
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
Eagan, Minnesota
October 3, 2006
A Listening Session was held prior to the regular City Council meeting on October 3, 2006 in the Eagan Room.
There were no visitors who wished to be heard.
A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on October 3, 2006 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal
Center. Present were Mayor Geagan, Councilmembers Carlson, Fields, Tilley, and Maguire. Also present were City
Administrator Tom Hedges, Community Development Director Jon Hohenstein, Public Works Director Tom
Colbert, City Planner Mike Ridley, City Attorney Mike Dougherty, and Administrative Secretary / Deputy Clerk
Mira Pepper.
AGENDA
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the agenda as presented.
Aye:5 Nay:0
RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
A plaque was presented to the City Council by Mike Foertsch, SEH in recognition of Money Magazine's designation
of Eagan as one of the best places to live.
CONSENT AGENDA
Item B (Personnel Items) was pulled for discussion.
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councihnember Fields seconded a motion to approve the consent agenda as
amended Aye:5 Nay:0
A. Minutes. It was recommended to approve the minutes of the September 14, 2006 special City Council
meeting and the September 26, 2006 regular City Council meeting as presented
B. Personnel Items.
1. It was recommended to ratify the appointment of Jeff Johnson as Deputy Chief of Police.
Fields — Maguire 5-0
2. It was recommended to ratify the Police Officer contract Tilley — Fields 5-0
C. Check Regjsters. It was recommended to ratify the check register dated September 28, 2006 as presented.
D. Delinquent Utility Bills. It was recommended to set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to consider the
final assessment of the delinquent utility bills and certify them to Dakota County for collection with
property taxes.
E. Delinquent False Alarm Bills. It was recommended to set a public hearing for November 9, 2006 to
consider the final assessment of the delinquent false alarm bills and certify them to Dakota County for
collection with property taxes.
F. Delinquent Weed Cutting Bills. It was recommended to set a public hearing for November 9,.2006 to
consider the final assessment of the delinquent weed cutting bills and certify them to Dakota County for
collection with property taxes.
G. Liquor License. It was recommended to approve the on -sale liquor and Sunday license for Tim Out
Management Eagan, Inc. dba Time Out Restaurant & sports Bar, 2864 Highway 55, Suite 900.
H: Project 928. It was recommended to receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 928 (Alexander Road /
Meadowview Road — Street Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 9, 2006.
I. Election Judges. It was recommended to approve the list of election judges for the November 7, 2006
General Election.
J. Capital Improvement Plan It was recommended to approve Dakota County's draft 5 -year Transportation
Capital Improvement Program for 2007-2011.
K. Housing Improvement Policy. It was recommended to approve an Amendment of the City's policy related
to Housing Improvement Districts to require replacement reserve studies meet Community Associations
Institute's National Reserve Study standards and performed by certified CAI reserve specialists.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 2
®RAFT
L. Short Tenn Lease. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of short term lease agreement for
Community Action Council — Armfiil of Love Program at Cedarvale Mall.
M. Energy Saving Equipment. It was recommended to award a contract to Harris Contracting Company to
install additional energy saving equipment at the Eagan Civic Arena, authorize the Mayor to sign the
appropriate documents and adjust the approved 2007 budget.
N. Donation. It was recommended to accept a donation of $200 to be used to place perennial plants or a tree
in Central Park.
O. Tobacco License. It was recommended to approve a tobacco license for Jacque Johnson, selling under the
name of Eagan Citgo at 4205 Nicola Road, Eagan.
P. Tobacco License. It was recommended to approve a tobacco license for Kaku Investments, Inc., selling
under the name of Go For It Gas at 4206 Nicols Road, Eagan, subject to approval by the Police
Department.
B. Personnel Items.
a. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to ratify the
appointment of Jeff Johnson as Deputy Chief of Police.
b. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to ratify the Police
Officer contracL
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PROJECT 932, WHISPERING WOODS ADDITIONS / SLATER ACRES / SLATER ROAD
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Whispering Woods
Additions, Slater Acres / Slater Road. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll
for Project 932 (Whispering Woods Additions / Slater Acres / Slater Road — Street Overlay Improvements) and
authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PROJECT 933, TOWN CENTRE DR. / O'LEARY LANE / GOLFVIEW DRIVE
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS — FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Town Centre Drive /
O'Leary Lane / Golfview Drive. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for
Project 933 (Town Centre Dr. / O'Leary Lane / Golfview Drive — Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PROJECT 926, SADDLEHORN / SUNSET / NORTH -VIEW MEADOWS ADDITIONS
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Saddlehom / Sunset /
Northview Meadows Additions. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes L) ` A /. T
October 3, 2006
Page 3
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for
Project 926 (Saddlehom / Sunset Additions / Northview Meadows — Street Overlay improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PROJECT 927, MEADOWLAND 1sT / BEAVER DAM ROAD / SUNCLIFF 1n — 5TO ADDITIONS
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the street overlay improvements for Meadowland 1" /
Beaver Dam Road / Suncliff 1 5a Additions street overlay improvements. Public Works Director Colbert gave
staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve the Final Assessment Roll for
Project 927 (Meadowland 1" / Beaver Dam Road / Suncliff 1" — 5b Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
LOT 1, BLOCK 1 EAGANDALE CORPORATE CENTER NO.4
EASEMENT VACATION
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding an easement vacation for Lot 1, Block 1, Eagandale
Corporate Center No. 4. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council
Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the vacation of a portion of
public drainage and utility easements within Lot 1, Block 1 Eagandale Corporate Center No. 4 and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
LOT 2, BLOCK 1, EAGANDALE OFFICE PARK 5TH ADDITION EASEMENT VACATION
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the vacation of a portion of public drainage and utility
easements within Lot 2, Block 1, Eagandale Office Park 5t" Addition. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff
report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to approve the vacation of a portion of
public drainage and utility easements within Lot 2, Block 1 Eagandale Office Park 5'h Addition and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING
IMPROVEMENT AREA AND IMPOSITION OF FEES ON HOUSING UNITS WITHIN THIN CEDAR
BLUFF HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area and
imposition of fees on housing units within the area.. Community Development Director Hohenstein gave a staff
report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing.
Dan Cooper, President of the Cedar Bluff Homeowners Association discussed the proposed improvements to the
Cedar Bluff buildings.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 4
®R,q FT
Jim Rosbold, Secretary / Treasurer of the Homeowners Association thanked the Council for considering the
proposed loan.
There being no further public comment, Mayor Geagan closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the
Council.
Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to direct preparation of the following:
1. An ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvements Area.
2. A resolution imposing fees on housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area to
finance improvements.
3. A Development Agreement between the City and the Association.
Aye: 5 Nay:0
OLD BUSINESS
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT — WINTER SEASON PARKING
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding an amendment to City Ordinance 9.09 (Winter Season
Parking) relating to winter parking regulations on certain city streets that have either even addresses on both sides of
the street or odd addresses on both sides of street. Public Works Director Colbeft gave a staff report.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve an amendment to City
Ordinance 9.09 (Winter Season Parking) relating to winter parking regulations on certain city streets that have either
even addresses on both sides of the street or odd addresses on both sides of the street and authorize publication in the
City's legal newspaper for two weeks. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 ,
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to approve a resolution establishing winter
season parking regulations as proposed by the City Engineer for Denmark Trail East/West and Denmark Court
EasWVest and authorize the installation of regulatory street signs. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CONTRACT 06-08, NORTH RIDGE DRIVE AND SIBLEY TERMINAL
STORM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding storm drainage improvements on Contract 08-08 (North
Ridge Drive and Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. Public Works Director Colbert gave.a staff report. Assistant City
Engineer John Gorder discussed the neighborhood meetings where the design and construction of the storm drainage
pipe was reviewed.
Councilmembers discussed the options for the construction of corrective storm drainage improvements.
Vince McGowan, Knoll Wood Court, discussed the auguring option which would cause more damage to his
property. He expressed concern over costs that he will incur.
Residents of the property adjacent to a portion of the proposed project (3 864 and 3868 North Ridge Drive) thanked
Council and commended Assistant City Engineer John Gorder'for his work on the project. They discussed
recommendations made by a soil specialist and requested that two trees be transplanted and replacement of
decorative rock be made in the disturbed areas.
Councilmembers discussed three alternate bids for the project. It was the consensus of the Council to approve
Alternate #3, which provides for the jacking / auguring of the proposed new storm sewer pipe between the existing
homes at 3864 and 3868 North Ridge Drive.
Councilmember Maguire moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to continue consideration to award
Conhact 06-08 (North Ridge Drive and Sibley Terminal Industrial Park Storm Drainage Improvements) to S.M.
Hentges and Sons, Inc. for Alternate #3 to the November 9th City Council meeting (or sooner). Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 5
NEW BUSINESS
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — BYERLY'S
"PAFT
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow outdoor
display of fresh produce at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place. City Planner Ridley gave a staff
report.
The number of bins to display fresh produce outside the store was discussed by Council and a representative of
Byerly's. It was the consensus of the Council that three bins be allowed.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow outdoor display of fresh produce at the Byerly's store located at 1299 Promenade Place, legally
described as Lot 8, Block 1, Eagan Promenade, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. An Amendment to the Planned Development Agreement shall be executed and recorded with the
Dakota County Recorder's office.
2. Fresh produce display shall be limited to three 4' x 4' bins located between the building and the
pillars near the front entrance.
3. Outside display shall occur only between May 1 and November 15 of each year.
4. Outside display items shall consist only of fresh seasonal produce. All items displayed shall be
confined to the bins themselves, and shall not extend onto the sidewalk or other areas around the
bins or along the storefront.
5. The bins shall not exceed 16 square feet each, and shall be painted a neutral color to match the .
building. The bins may have the Byerly's name displayed on one side.
6. One pricing sign may be displayed for each bin. The signs shall be uniform in design, and shall
not exceed the proposed 11" x 7" size.
7. No more than two propane cages shall be permitted Placement of the propane cages shall be
adjacent to the building and in compliance with applicable fire codes and ordinances.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — INTERSTATE PARTNERS
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow a detached
trash enclosure at 2864 Highway 55. City Planner Ridley gave a staff report
Matt Miller representing Interstate Partners discussed the location of the trash enclosure.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Carlson seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow a detached trash enclosure on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in
the east 1/2 of Section 2, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 4 Nay: 1 (Maguire opposed)
1. The applicant shall enter into an amended Planned Development Agreement that memorializes the approval
of a detached enclosure.
2. The applicant shall record the amended Planned Development Agreement against Lot 3, Block 1, Grand
Oak Five.
3. The applicant shall provide a revised Landscape Plan (with Building Permit application) that illustrates
additional plantings in the area of the enclosure.
4. The enclosure shall be located and constructed as shown on the Site/Details Plan sheet dated 8-16-06.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow temporary signage on Lot 3, Block 1, Grand Oak Five located at 2864 Highway 55 in the east
'/x of Section 2, subject to the following conditions. Ay: 5 Nay: 0
1. The applicant is allowed two temporary signs not to exceed a total of 50 square feet.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 6
1)P'q FT
2. The applicant is allowed to display two temporary signs until the Tim Out Bar and Restaurant opens or
December 31, 2006, whichever comes first.
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — WELLS FARGO
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow a third
automatic teller machine at the Wells Fargo facility at 3390 Pilot Knob Road. City Planner Ridley gave a staff
report.
Councihnember Carlson moved, Councihnember Fields seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow a third automatic teller machine for their facility at 3390 Pilot Knob Road (Lot 1, Block 1,
Norwest V Addition) on the northeast comer of Pilot Knob and Yankee Doodle Roads in the SW ''A of Section 10
subject to the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. The applicant shall enter into a Planned Development Amendment Agreement wit the City and record same
against Lot 1, Block 1, Norwest 1" Addition.
2. The installation of the third ATM and widening of the drive aisle shall comply with the Site Plan dated
August 16, 2006, and the three ATMs shall have the some appearance. Plan that adds a
3. The applicant shall provide (with the Building Permit application) a revised Landscape
grouping of non -evergreen ornamental trees in the area east and north of the pylon sign to improve and
balance the aesthetics at this high profile intersection. application.
4. The applicant shall provide grading and drainage information with the Building Permit app
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT — SUPERIOR AUTO CENTER
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow the
expansion of the existing auto service facility, to include a collision center at 3425 Washington Drive. City Planner
Ridley gave a staff report.
Quinn Hudson, representing the applicant discussed the proposed expansion and upgrades to the existing facility.
Councihnember Fields moved, Councihnember Maguire seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development
Amendment to allow the expansion of the existing auto service facility to include a collision center at 3425
Washington Drive on Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Bicentennial 3rd Addition located in the NF 1/4 of Section 16 subject to
the following conditions: Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. The applicant shall execute and record a Planned Development Agreement at Dakota County within 60 days
of the date of Council approval and proof of its recording be provided to the City.
2. The two parcels shall be replatted into one lot.
3. The replatted parcel shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement around the perimeter of the site.
4. All maintenance, detailing and collision repair shall only occur inside the building.
5. New and updated building facades shall be constructed per the submitted elevation plan dated 8-16-06.
6. The outdoor storage area, as depicted on the Site Plan dated 8-16-06, shall be enclosed by an opaque, 8' tall
privacy fence.
7. All employee and vehicles in the service queue shall be located in the enclosed storage area.
8. in no instance shall customer vehicles be parked overnight outside of the enclosure.
9. Landscaping shall be installed as shown on the plan dated 8-16-06.
LEGISLATIVE / INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE
There was no legislative / intergovernmental affairs update.
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
City Administrator Hedges discussed a proposed passport service to be located at the Eagan Community Center.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
October 3, 2006
Page 7
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to designate the Egan Community Center
as a passport service center. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
There were no visitors who wished to be heard.
It was noted that a closed session of the Economic Development Authority would be held following the regular
Council meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Maguire seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
Date Administrative Secretary / Deputy City Clerk
le, audio
., please
If you aneed these minutes in an n, 3830 Pilots Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (65 ) 675orm such as large -5000, (ITDD phone:�(651)454-853 )nom the City
of Egan,
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities,
facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual
orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. Eagan Community Center Organizational Change/Advertisement
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the proposed reorganization of the clerical support staff in Community Development
by replacing one Clerical Tech III with a Clerical Tech IV and authorize the advertisement of a
Clerical Tech IV. ,
FACTS:
• The Community Development Department presently has one Office Supervisor, 2 full- .
time and one'/, time (30 hours a week) Clerical Tech III's.
• With the resignation of one of the full-time Clerical Techs, department management met
to consider various options to reorganize the department.
• With the anticipated upcoming retirement of the Office Supervisor, replacing the vacant
Clerical Tech III with a Clerical Tech IV with a higher level of duties would allow for the
replacement of the Office Supervisor at a lower pay step with a savings, beginning in
mid -2007, to be applied to the upgraded clerical position.
• The Clerical Tech IV position would function as a lead to the other clerical techs as well
as additional higher level duties in the department.
• The intent of this reorganization is to shift duties within the support team and create the
capacity for the Office Supervisor. replacement in 2007 to incorporate other support duties
for the department.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
C RATIFY CHECK REGISTERS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To ratify the check registers dated October 5, 2006 and October 12, 2006
as presented.
ATTACHMENTS:
Check registers dated October 5, 2006 and October 12, 2006 are enclosed without
page number.
Agenda Memo
October 17, 2007
Regular City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA:
D. EXEMPT PERMIT FOR FAITHFUL SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
Approve Exempt Permit for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School to hold a raffle on
January 27, 2007 at 3355 Columbia Drive.
FACTS:
Faithful Shepherd Catholic School has applied for a Minnesota Lawful Gambling Exempt
Permit to hold a raffle at the school on January 27, 2007
All requirements of the application have been met and staff deems it in order for approval
The raffle is an annual event for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School
ATTACHMENTS:
• Attached on page 5— is a copy of the proposed resolution approving the exempt
permit.
• The application is available for review in the Administration Department
RESOLUTION
CITY OF EAGAN
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM
LAWFUL GAMBLING LICENSE
FAITHFUL SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL
WHEREAS, the Faithful Shepherd Catholic School has applied for an Exemption
from Lawful Gambling License; and
WHEREAS, the Eagan Police Department has reviewed the application and has
not identified any reason to deny; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Eagan,
Dakota County, Minnesota, hereby approves the Exemption from Lawful Gambling
License for the Faithful Shepherd Catholic School to conduct a raffle on January 27,
2007 at 3355 Columbia Drive in Eagan.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
It's Mayor
Attest:
It's Clerk
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Those in Favor: All
Those Against: None
Date: October 17, 2006
CERTIFICATION
I, Maria Petersen, Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof
assembled this 17" day of October, 2006.
Maria Petersen, City Clerk
Agenda Memo
October 17, 2007
Regular City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA:
E. PIGEON LICENSE FOR ERIC DRENCKHAHN, 2811 PILOT KNOB ROAD
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
Approve a Pigeon License for Eric Drenckhahn, 2811 Pilot Knob Road
FACTS:
• Erick Drenchkhahn has requested a permit to house pigeons on his property at 2811 Pilot
Knob Road
• The City Council approved three variances in relation to the structures on Mr.
Drenchkahahn's property at the September 5a' Council meeting
• The Animal Control Officer visited the property and reported that all requirements of the
application have been met and that the premises is in excellent condition .
• Staff deems this application in order for approval
• Mr. Drenchkhahn will be out of town and unable to attend the Council meeting. He has
requested that the item be tabled should there be any issues be raised by Council
ATTACHMENTS:
Attached on page l� is a copy of an e-mail to the City Council from Mr.
Drenchkhahn
The application is available for review in the Administration Department
Page 1 of 1
Mira Pepper
From: edrenckh@comoast.net
Sent: Sunday, October 08, 2006 7:49 PM
To: City Council
Subject: Next Weeks Council Meeting
I will be out of town for the meeting when the Council will consider issuance of my Pigeon Permit. I
spoke with Myra and she advised that since the permit was on the consent addenda, and my inspection
went well, it should not be a problem.
I do not have any issues with this, however I would like to request that if there are any issues, the item
be tabled for a future meeting.
Thank you for all of your past work and good luck in the upcoming election!
Eric Drenckhahn
I nionnnr%
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
F. PROJECT 877 LEXINGTON AVENUE LONE OAK ROAD TO TH 55
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 877
(Lexington Avenue, Lone Oak Road to Trunk Highway 55 — Street Reconstruction and
Overlay) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 21, 2006.
FACTS:
Project 877 provided for street rehabilitation to the north one mile of Lexington
Avenue (County State Aid Highway 43). The northern 1/3`d of this section was
reconstructed and realigned when I -35E was built in 1983 and needed a structural
maintenance mill and overlay as part of the project. The middle segment was over 35
years old with significant distresses and did not meet County structural design
standards. This segment required a full reconstruction with new concrete curb and
gutter. The southern segment was fully reconstructed in 1993 with the upgrade of the
Lone Oak Road intersection and needed only a surface mill and overlay.
• The City was the lead agency on the improvement of this County highway. In
accordance with County policy, the City is obligated to participate in 45% of the cost
of any reconstruction (i.e. middle section) and all new trail installations. The City's
policy for financing this obligation is to levy a special assessment against the adjacent
properties benefiting from these street upgrade improvements. The trail improvement
is not assessable and will be financed from the City's Major Street and Trail Fund.
• This project, constructed under Contract 04-04, has been completed, all costs
tabulated and the final assessment roll prepared. The assessments are based upon the
City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for all such assessable properties.
• This roll is now being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a
public hearing to formally present the final costs to be levied against the benefited
properties.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled prior to the final
assessment hearing with the affected property owners and address any concerns.
• The final assessments are equal to or less than the estimate contained in the feasibility
report presented at the public hearing held on March 16, 2004. Residential property
assessments are based upon an appraised value stipulated in the feasibility report.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the amendments to contractual snow
plowing agreements with Gallagher's, Inc for the street and cul de sac snow removal and
Bever Landscaping for trail and sidewalk snow removal for the 2006-2007 winter season
and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
In the Fall of 2005, the City of Eagan advertised for sealed quotations for the 2005-
2006 snow and ice control season/operations for our supplemental assistance on our
streets, trails and sidewalks. For the 2006-2007 snow and ice season, both
contractors have agreed to maintain their same fees and rates if the City will
consider approving an amendment allowing for a fuel surcharge due to the historical
fluctuations in fuel prices.
Gallagher's, Inc., was the successful bidder for the street and cul de sac snow
removal and Bever Landscaping was the successful bidder for trail and sidewalk
snow removal. Both contractors have agreed to the terms of the fuel surcharge
amendment as prepared by the City Attorney's office.
The new fuel surcharge amendment allows for an incremental re -imbursement of
fuel purchased over $2.50 per gallon for diesel grade gasoline of for the 2006-2007
snow and ice control season.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
H. DEVELOPMENT ACCEPTANCE & MAINTENANCE
AUTHORIZATION — CITY PROJECT 04R
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Acknowledge the completion of public
infrastructure improvements for City Project No. 04-R (Evergreen Enclave Addition)
under terms of the Development Agreement and authorize perpetual City maintenance
subject to warranty provisions.
FACTS:
Evergreen , Enclave Addition is a 7 -lot single family residential subdivision
constructed north of Diffley Road west of Lexington Way. This development
required the constructing public sanitary sewer, water main and storm sewer, along
with site grading, which were all performed privately by the developer under the
terms and conditions of the development contract agreement.
The improvements have been completed, inspected by representatives of the Public
Works Department and found to be in order for favorable Council action for
acceptance for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions.
This acceptance does not constitute a release of the developer's responsibility under
conditions of the development contract to convey Outlot A, Evergreen Enclave to the
City of Eagan in fulfillment of the development's park dedication requirements.
Financial securities will remain in place to guarantee this conveyance to the City.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council
I. FINAL SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (RED
PINE CROSSING) — REVESTORS, INC.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the Vacation of a portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club Road) west of Biscayne
Avenue in the SE `/4 of Section 36.
To approve a Final Subdivision (Red Pine Crossing) to create two lots upon approximately 9.82
acres located south of Red Pine Lane and east of Hwy. 3 in the SE'/4 of Section 36.
To approve a Final Planned Development (Red Pine Crossing) to allow three commercial retail
buildings on approximately 9.82 acres located south of Red Pine Lane and east of Hwy. 3 in the
SE'/< of Section 36.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Councilmembers present.
FACTS:
➢ The Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development were approved April
4, 2006.
➢ A public hearing regarding the Vacation of Gun Club Road right-of-way was held on July
18, 2006. City Council action on the vacation was continued to be concurrent with the
final plat for Red Pine Crossing.
D All documents and agreements have been signed and are in order for execution at the
. regular meeting of the City Council.
ATTACHMENTS (2): �/►
July 18, 2006 A€ nnda memo and City Council meeting minutes, pages Lam/ through
24
Final Plat, page UL
Agenda Information Memo
July 18, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
D. GUN CLUB ROAD - RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the Public Hearing and continue consideration
of the vacation of i portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club Road) to be concurrent with
the Final Plat approval of Red Pine Crossings.
FACTS:
• On January 20, 2006, City staff received a petition from Quinn Hutson, CNH
Architects representing Revestors, Inc., the developers of proposed Red Pine
Crossing, requesting the vacation of a portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club
Road) adjacent to Parcels 10-03600-021-79 and 10-03600-022-79 (Red Pine
Crossing), east of Highway 3 in southeast Eagan.
• The petition was held to coincide with the final subdivision approval process for the
Red Pine Crossing development.
• On June 12, 2006, final subdivision submittal was made by the developer of Red Pine
Crossing, Revestors, Inc.
• The purpose of the request is to allow the developer to construct the Red Pine
Crossing development as approved with the preliminary planned development and
subdivision, with utilization of the vacated Gun Cub Road right-of-way.
The Gun Club Road right-of-way east of the Red Pine Crossing development will
remain.
• Notices for the public hearing were published in the legal newspaper and sent to all
potentially affected and/or interested parties for .comment prior to the scheduled
public hearing. Notices were sent to all the potentially impacted private utility
companies. No objections to the proposed vacation have been received as of the date
of this report.
• Consideration of the Red Pine Crossing final subdivision is scheduled at the August 1
Council meeting.
• There are private utilities (Dakota Electric Associations power lines and other
utilities) within this portion of right-of-way proposed to be vacated that will require
the Red Pine Crossing development to dedicate easements to cover the relocation of
the existing utilities.
• The request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order
for favorable Council action in conjunction with the final subdivision and plat
approval of Red Pine Crossing at a future Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map, page
• Right -of -Way Vacation Exhibit, page
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
July 18, 2006
Page 3
authorize the acquisition of the pond easement for the appraisal estimate; and authorize the on of
de plans and specifications for a contract to be let within two Years. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PRO 929, RED PINE LANE / GUN CLUB ROAD STREET & ROVEMENTS
City Administrator He � introduced this item regarding street and utility ' ements on Red Pine Lane /Gun
Club Road. Traffic Engin ath gave a staff reporL
Mayor Geagan opened the p6lic
Two residents of Red Pine Court suggested Rote
a sidewalk be installed.
Mark Piper, 4895 Biscayne Avenue, dis the
should be assessed for the improve m as he pai
building is already connected to er and water.
improved signage at the crosswalk, and
to his property, stating he does not feel be
Biscayne Avenue improvements and his
There being no further, c comment, Mayor Geagan closed the public and turned discussion back to the
Council.
Councihnemb Carlson moved Councilmembcr Fields seconded a notion to approve Proje (Red
Pine Lane /
Gun Club ad — Street and Utility Improvements) and authorize the preparation of detailed plans
suet tions. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
GUN CLUB ROAD —RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
CitAdministrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the vacation of a portion of public right of -way. He noted
that it was recommended that consideration of this item be continued to be concurrent with the final Plat approval
City of
Red Pine Crossing. Public Works Director Colbert gave a staff report.
Mayor Geagan opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, he closed the public hearing and turned
discussion back to the Council.
Councihnember Tilley moved, Councihnember Fields seconded a motion to close the public hearing and continue
consideration of the vacation of a portion of public right-of-way (Gun Club Road) to be concurrent with the Final
Plat approval of Red Pine Crossing. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VARIANCES — EAGAN AUTO MALL
City Administrato es introduced this item regarding a request for a variance to allow a ed trash
enclosure and a variance o et to the 50 foot front yard setback for a detached gave
mthe
repC CSC
district for the Eagan Auto Mall to at 1379 Town Centre Drive. City PI dley g
Mayor Geagsn opened the public hearing.
discussion back to the Council-
Councihnember Fields moved, Col
trash enclosure in the CSC district
Section 15, subject to the followin
closed the public hearing and turned
,T�Seconded a to approve a Variance to allow a detached
r Auto Mall located at 13 wn Centre Drive in the NW '/. of
Aye: 5 Nay: 0
1. If within Foner approval,the variance shall not have been completed or it shall become null
and voidpetition for extension has been granted by the Council. Such extension be requested in
ori ' days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or
the use permitted in the variance.
J
RED PINE
/ t
Yeinity Map _ /
selF. Fa remN n. anee a
M STd.
Cy' ;
N/
,Z/ t
t
M M M a M SOu1MYl Pmlx �,1,` pI d
N 4[bn M lemM T. Mme• Il b � '/ f f t:
mane ro iew a Msbl.a HPP C[ t t. t .
mwSl M T •.Ms M r.we:e
Ibw IY IN II
• Pmaln T Wmmnl Ip/W /
T ;
le �L-'-- / /• � pf
Pv o Yx a aew w✓ ma.+v " / i�� / f,^— � J
61 Fn4 v.w eTnan,Md , s /
I JI/ LAND J
`! (g0
CROSSING ��F°°���.�:�a._.Mm.I�.IM.a.as.M�.a..,.M.�,.aM�✓:...:d....,.b
dmW b M fw4 a POM. Ab x IRMMs b wt
M Mfi AO M1 ✓ M ,YP.n1 PSM a M SYIw: NmM a Fabs M TTN FF. IYY. a .mIH':�I / b a
4 / O / qYM �Ia 4 M ml�Iwile�Rial� b M :aSm10s Immo. m1 IM Wm�b
// � • N
r//'�H �r w M �r:w + �.°Nm"M' aotw'r�.rn, s w+w� Ibb'd't.":'s aM:F M'lib�as ✓"°"o..'p.'ip0`M +"
IF911U2 vd1 Y M OanM rx Fn.d
�` ;� ��\ OL'��F ww rP.s M nm ro a w..e...r ober . I107 nrr aossbo nx a Mq,,, .pysb+b �w �..N a ew�m w FSM• •• b:m.
..{F�"'���Q,p}y���• M PrmoMsa ax xm MM. M .wmnb m awn m M M M b.MY
'/�Ia/ FF�Ag \ YaaPr .laOAs aM
Y ✓ems r.� W YsePI Owv� . IIeM.eY bNlr W V Mm.n I:m mmr Mn Pmsm
anPl w a bP
O.W. a abnn ~"&
O a�a.baT—
/' M Ynodq Fa1nPYn1 ... mbrox.mr Mw •ro nA�sm a moa 4 Wb:m IF Y:Meeb PM 1Huee a
�j aw.M PUP .. ,K . Pa:xaF bdr b.ilb senPenan EiYd a��
n
`� �`- ```-� I O m:.y.mi/ IYI I Im. M.MI N MxM W A✓b YMI m PY da m I® mF � Pb W dN Y s mnnl lrsneYm
- ��``'I F^ d W Yn.F Pwf d !MM aP M:w.M dem m W OM F: M1a M MSNW d e M.t M d neMmN rm Me aa:Mb a+mY b
s L3 ywddm�ipii°ydm �yw, �.�F.�WnmF. a rp:aes a W oa . +�. F � �yw�l• °1e m .x ar m rmm Y Iwmeb
�T
I •'
I ••- M amdM S^.N'. crFbb T awwlMpr blr. w Pb_ab H . lma b Tsnm i Mn. :Msh
I tp IYn.. w un..
1 I —
I '
m � W M.ebv: F9.m JwnF Fa tPIP
I
1r i M w Mb mM wt m w_M a� Nm w Pb CW a [Mn Ylwmm 4vmr db W6
\IP �
yp �
i: Mm4 w FOadx Fano. wWw waw w dx em rn mxmr N _.m ✓ . as
rM c uM.m. PY Mas Pmv..
1
I
I -
eee.��� I I naeeF maW m w mW w M F.s FPm M W as rmw r us FYI m nm os am...F n... Yw reb ms m rbm✓s
l bm, a em r PxM..F.r Pb_r/ a . aoea .
Ua
rt a 9'1 E IIiTN 88718 STREET �. EAST 5 I Mori I:ot m MmbaMF w we M W ane. a W owb ams. M exwe m N _w a . aeos x
_r_x w s+t Mmr Y rd a aew—
IymT lis
Pnw L:PMa✓PeP.s M MMry ✓MFelesl .
m M Iws�Y it Mw Y
eMnl
a Ym•m: P+b. _. __ __ _ _e Rehder and Associates. Inc.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council
J. FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL SUBDIVISION (LO
NIDY — FORMERLY GOPHER COMMONS) - GOPHER RESOURCES
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a Final Subdivision of 21 acres to create 3 Lots and ,one Outlot on property located
in the southwest corner of Yankee Doodle Road and Highway 149 in the NW '/4 of Section 13;
subject to conditions in the July 6, 2006 City Council minutes.
To approve a Final Planned Development to allow a 52,500 SF office/warehouse building on
Lot 2, Block 1, Lo Nidy, located in the southwest comer of Yankee Doodle Road and Highway
149 in the NW Y4 of Section 13; subject to conditions in the July 6, 2006 City Council minutes.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of members present
FACTS:
➢ The City Council approved a Preliminary Subdivision (on July 6, 2006) of a site that
consists of a single, vacant unplatted parcel. A concrete recycling facility previously
operated on the site for a number of year;..
➢ The overall proposal consists of three office/warehouse buildings; users are not identified
and shall be consistent with permitted Limited Industrial uses. Final Planned
Development approval will be required for each parcel.
➢ As a Planned Development, parking will be shared and the overall parking is exceeded by
41 parking,stalls.
➢ Outdoor storage is not proposed at this time and would require a Planned Development
Amendment if future outdoor storage is needed
ISSUES:
➢ The Dakota County Plat Commission originally did not approve the preliminary plat due
to access issues. Those issues have been resolved.
ATTACHMENTS: (2)
Plat map on page �.
Development plan for Lot 2 on page 25 .
Lo
Nldy
PARK
- - - - - - - - - -
-
f: ii A
w
"Wr SUM
YAMKEE�., DOODLE ROAD
M
SY
...
4-1 -------
-----------
-------
01� A
B
0
.. ....... .......
A
J-
- - - - - - - - - -
II .I
7 I t tl ii.
/
/
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting
K EXTENSION FOR RECORDING FINAL PLAT — MANLEY COMMERCIAL
ADDITION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a 60 -day extension of time to record the final plat for Manley Commercial Addition,
located on O'Neill Drive south of I-494 and west of Argenta Trail in the NE'/4 of Section 1.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Councilmembers present
FACTS:
➢ The City Council approved the final plat on August 15, 2006. The plat is required to be
recorded within 60 days of approval.
D The applicant has submitted a letter with this request explaining the reasons for the
extension.
D The 60 -day extension would allow until December 14, 2006 for the plat to be recorded.
ATTACHMENTS (1):
Letter from Ben Sporer, Landform, page ZI
71w
AIL
WMA
LANDFORM
MINNEAPOLIS• PHOENIX
October 2, 2006
Pam Dudziak
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Final Plat —Manley Addition
Dear Ms. Dudziak,
J, OCT i3. 3� L,vl-ilto
All i
While we've made every effort to stay on track with required city schedules regarding
this project, we may be close to the 60 days required for the final recording of the Final
Plat.. This letter serves as a request for an extension on behalf of the current applicant,
Larry Laukka. Please find the enclosed check in the amount of $75.00. Also, please
call me directly with any questions, 612.638.0263.
Be ' mi Sporer, Project Designer
Bs/bs
COPY:
ENCL: check #
landform Engineering Company doing business as Landform
BOOC BUTLER SQUARE 100 NORTH 6TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55403
OFFICE: 612.252.9070 FAX: 512.252.9077 www.landform.net
Agenda Information Memo
Eagan City Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
October 17, 2006
L.
To approve the implementation of a Housing bnprovement District under Minnesota
Statutes Sections 428A.11 -428A.21 by the adoption of -
1.
f
1. An ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvements Area.
2. A resolution imposing fees on housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing
Improvement Area to finance improvements.
3. A Development Agreement between the -City and the Association.
FACTS:
The owners of the Cedar Bluff Townhomes have requested that the City establish
a Housing Improvement Area to finance the replacement of patio doors and
windows and to repair concrete and.foundations:
A city may create a Housing Improvement Area to finance improvements to the
common areas of condo and townhome associations when other financing cannot
be obtained. This financing mechanism was adopted by the state legislature
because homeowner associations cannot readily obtain financing; they have very
little collateral and cannot mortgage individual's units. Within a Housing
Improvement Area, the City may finance housing improvements and recover the
cost by assessing fees, much like special assessments. The fees are assessed
against each unit, and appear on the property tax statement to be paid by the
individual homeowners with their taxes.
• The sequence of events that has preceded this action is as follows:
o In 2005, the City Council was approached by the Cedar Bluffs
Homeowners Association regarding the potential creation of a City policy
for the creation of Housing Improvement District .
o In response, the City Council adopted a policy on September 20, 2005 that
would permit consideration of petitions and the process by which
applications would be reviewed.
o On April 4, 2006, the City Council received the Cedar Bluffs
Homeowners Association preliminary application and petition and
authorized staff to request that the Association make a formal submittal of
improvement plans, detailed financial plans and a fee to cover City costs
associated with the detailed review.
o Those submittals were made and reviewed by City staff, the City
Attorney, the Dakota County CDA and Ehlers and Associates, the City's
fiscal consultant. They are in order for formal consideration through the.
public hearing process.
o On September 5, 2006 the City Council adopted a resolution calling for a
public hearing on October 3, and notice was duly published and
distributed to the owners of each unit, as required by state law. On
October 3, 2006, the public hearing was held and the Council directed the
preparation of the ordinance, resolution and development agreement noted
in the action item above.
The total cost of the improvements, including financing costs, is estimated to be
$767,900. The City will make a loan to the association in an amount up to
$767,900 at an interest rate of 5.5% and amortized over 15 years. The proposed
annual housing improvement fee will be set at 105% of the annual principal and
interest due.
• . The proposed fee for each homeowner is:
o $660.45 per year ($55.04 per month)
o $6,368.44 total if paid in fall
ATTACHMENTS:
o Ordinance on pagesW through
o Resolution imposing fees on the housing units on es through
o Development Agreement on es S� through
o Review schedule on page I
o Location map on page 43
v preliminary project costs and fee estimates on page
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING
IMPROVEMENT AREA PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES,
SECTIONS 428A.11 to 428A.21.
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Eagan ("City") is authorized under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 428A.11
to 428A-21 (the "Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within which housing
improvements are made or constructed and the costs of the improvements are paid in whole or in
part from fees imposed within the area
1.02. The Eagan City Council ("Council') has adopted a Housing Improvement Area
policy.
1.03. The City has determined a need to establish the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area as further defined herein, in order to facilitate certain improvements to property known as the
"Cedar Bluff Condominiums," all in accordance with the Housing Improvement Area policy.
1.04. The City has consulted with the Cedar Bluff Condominium Association, Inc. (the
"Condominium Association") and the condominium owners regarding the establishment of the
Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area and the housing improvements to be constructed and
financed under this ordinance.
Section 2. Fes.
2.01. The Council finds that, in accordance with Section 428A.12 of the Act, owners of at
least 25 percent of the housing units within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area have filed a
petition with the City Clerk requesting a public hearing regarding establishment of such housing
improvement area.
2.02. On October 3, 2006, the City conducted a public hearing, duly noticed in accordance
with Section 428A-13 of the Act, regarding adoption of this ordinance, at which all persons,
including owners of property within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, were given an
opportunity to be heard.
2.03. The Council finds that, without establishment of the Cedar Bluff Housing
Improvement Area, the Housing Improvements (as hereinafter defined) could not be made by the
condominium association for, or the housing unit owners in, the Condominium Association.
2.04. The Council f ether finds that designation of the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area is needed to maintain and preserve the housing units within such area.
2.05 The City will be the implementing entity for the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area and the improvement fee.
2.06 The Council finds that the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area meets each of
the approval criteria contained in the Housing Improvement Area Policy, including the criterion that
a majority of the condominium association owners support the project and the Housing
Improvement Area financing. The Condominium Association presented evidence to the Council
adequate to demonstrate that these criteria were met, including Presentation to the Council of the
petitions described in 2.01 above.
Section 3. Housing Improvement Area Defined
3.01. The Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area is hereby defined as the area of the City
legally described as Units I —120, Cedar Bluffs Townhome Condominiums (CIC 358).
3.02. The Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area contains 120 housing units as of the date
of adoption of this ordinance.
Section 4. Housing hnnrovements Defined
4.01. For the purposes of this ordinance and the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area,
the term "Housing improvements" shall mean the following improvements to the housing
units and common areas withinthe Cedar B1uffHousing Improvement Area:
Window and patio door replacement in each unit and foundation repair
4.02. Housing improvements shall also be deemed to include:
(a) all costs of architectural and engineering services in connection with the activities
described in Section 4.01;
(b) all administration, legal and consultant costs in connection with the Cedar Bluff
Housing Improvement Area; and
(c) costs of arranging financing for the Housing Improvements under the Housing
Improvement Act; and
(d) interest on the internal loan as described in Section 6.01.
Section 5. Housing horrovement Fee.
5.01. The City may, by resolution adopted in accordance with the petition, hearing and
notice procedures required under Section 428A.14 of the Act, impose a fee on the housing units
within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, at a rate, term or amount sufficient to produce
revenues required to provide the Housing Improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "Housing
Improvement Fee'), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Section.
5.02. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed upon each unit (120 units) within
CIC 358.
5.03. The Housing Improvement Fee shall be imposed and payable for a period no greater
than 15 years after the first installment is due and payable.
5.04. Housing unit owners shall be permitted to prepay the Housing Improvement Fee in .
accordance with the terms specified in the resolution imposing the fee.
5.05. The Housing Improvement Fee shall not exceed the amount specified in the notice of
public hearing regarding the approval of such fee; provided, however, that the Housing
Improvement Fee may be reduced after approval of the resolution setting the Housing Improvement
Fee, in the manner specified in such resolution.
Section 6. Housing hnmovement Area Loan.
6.01. At any time after a contract with the Condominium Association for construction of all
or part of the Housing Improvements has been entered into or the work has been ordered, and the
period for prepayment of the Housing Improvement Fee has expired as described in Section 5.04
hereof, the Council may begin disbursement to the Condominium Association of the proceeds of an
internal loan (the "loan') of available City funds in the principal amounts necessary to finance the
cost of the Housing Improvements that have not been prepaid, together with administrative costs.
6.02. The City may refinance the loan or any unpaid portion of the loan at any time by
issuing bonds secured by Housing Improvement Fees, as outlined by Section 428A.16 of the Act
Section 7. Annual Repasts.
7.01. On October 31, 2007, and each year thereafter until there are no longer any
outstanding obligations in connection with the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area, the
Condominium Association (and any successor in interest) shall submit to the City Clerk a copy of
the Condominium Association's audited financial statements.
7.02. The Condominium Association (and any successor in interest) shall also submit to the
City any other reports or information at the times and as required by any contract entered into
between that entity and the City.
Section 8. Notice of Right to File Obiedions
8.01. Within five days after the adoption of this ordinance, the City Cleric is authorized and
directed to mail to the owner of each housing unit in the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area: a
summary of this ordinance; notice that owners subject to the proposed Housing Improvement Fee
have a right to veto this ordinance if ownersof at least 35 percent of the housing units within the
Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area file a written objection with the City Clerk before the
effective date of this ordinance; and notice that a copy of this ordinance is on file with the City
Clerk for public inspection.
Section 9. Amendment
9.01. This ordinance may be amended by the Council upon compliance with the public
hearing and notice requirements set forth in Section 428A.13 of the Act
3Z-
Section 10. Effective Date.
10.1. This ordinance shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof.
ATTEST:
By: Maria Petersen
Its: City Clerk
Date Ordinance Adopted:
Date Ordinance Published in the Legal Newspaper:
CITY OF EAGAN
City Council
By: Pat Geagan
Its: Mayor
m
CITY OF EAGAN
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING A HOUSING IMPROVEMENT FEE
FOR THE CEDAR BLUFF HOUSING MPROVEMENT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The City of Eagan ("City') is authorized under Mm. STAT. §§ 428A.11 -428A.21
(the "Housing Improvement Act") to establish by ordinance a housing improvement area within
which housing improvements are made or constructed and the costs of the improvements are
paid in whole or in part from fees imposed within the area
1.02. In accordance with the Housing Improvement Act, owners of at least 25% of the
housing units within Cedar Bluff Townhouse Condominium Association have filed a petition
with the City requesting a public hearing regarding imposition of the housing improvement fee
for the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area
1.03. The City Council of the City on October 3, 2006, conducted a public hearing duly
noticed in accordance with the Housing Improvement Act, including the adoption of this
resolution, at which all persons, including owner of the property within Cedar Bluff Housing
Improvement Area, were given an opportunity to be heard.
1.04. Prior to the date hereof:, the Cedar Bluff Homeowner's Association (the
"Association") had submitted to the City a financial plan prepared by an independent third party
acceptable to the City that provides for the Association to finance maintenance and operations of
the common area.
1.05. For purposes of this Resolution the terms "Housing Improvement Area" and
"Housing Improvements"have the meanings provided in Sections 3 and 4 of the Ordinance.
Section 2. Housing Improvement Fee Imposed
2.01. The City hereby imposes a fee on each housing unit within the Housing
Improvement Area (the "Housing Improvement Feel of the City legally described as Units 1
through 120, Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium (CIC 358), which Housing Improvement
Fee is imposed based on the total cost of the housing improvements to be financed by the
Housing Improvement Fee divided by the number of housing units.
2.02. The owner of any housing unit, which the Housing Improvement Fee is imposed,
may, at any time within 30 days after the effective date of this resolution, pay all or a portion of
the total 'Housing Improvement Fee imposed against such housing unit, any Housing
Improvement Fee (or a portion thereof) not prepaid in accordance with this Section shall be
payable solely in accordance with Section 2.03 hereof.
2.03. If not prepaid in accordance with Section 2.02 hereof, the Housing Improvement
Fee (or any unpaid portion thereof) shall be paid in equal annual installments over a period of 15
years, the first installment to be paid in calendar year 2007, which annual payment shall be
deemed to include interest on the unpaid Housing Improvement Fee from the date of this
Resolution at a rate of 5.5 percent per annum.
2.04. The Housing Improvement Fee, unless prepaid in accordance with Section 2.02
hereof, shall be payable at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and
collection of any ad valorem taxes. The Housing Improvement Fee imposed against each
housing unit shall. not exceed $660.45 per year, for a total 15 -year fee of $9,906.75
(or $6,368.44, if prepaid pursuant to Section 2.02).
Section 3. Notice of Right to File Obiections.
3.01 Within five days after the adoption of this Resolution, the City Clerk is authorized
and directed to mail to the owner of each housing unit in the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement
Area a summary of this Resolution; notice that the owners subject to the Housing Improvement
Fee have a right to veto this Resolution if owners of at least 35 percent of the housing units
within the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area file an objection with the City Clerk before
the effective date of this Resolution; and notice that a copy of the Ordinance is on file with the
City Clerk for public inspection.
Section 4. Effective Date.
4.01. This Resolution shall be effective 45 days after adoption hereof.
Section 5. Filine of Housing Improvement Fee.
5.01. The City Clerk shall file a certified copy of this Resolution to be recorded on the
property tax list of Dakota County for the Cedar Bluff Housing Improvement Area.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Eagan this _ day of ,2006.
Pat Geagan, Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Development Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of
'2006, by and between the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal
corporation (the "City"), and CEDAR BLUFF TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, INC., a Minnesota non-profit corporation, (the "Association"). (The City and
Association shall collectively be referred to hereinafter as the "Parties").
WHEREAS, the Association consists of 120 condominium units (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 428A, the requisite
percentage.of property owners within the Association filed a petition with the City Clerk to
request a public hearing concerning the establishment of a housing improvement area to allow
the Association to undertake housing improvements as defined herein; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted a public hearing and adopted an ordinance to establish
the Cedar Bluff housing improvement area; and
WHEREAS, the City will finance the housing improvements (as defined herein) and
create a housing improvement fee, provided that the Association enter into this Agreement.
NOW, WHEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and other good and
valuable consideration, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Housmo IMPROVEMENTS. The Association must undertake the following
housing improvements to the Property: window replacement and patio
door replacement for each unit and concrete and foundation repair (the
"Housing Improvements").
2. HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA LOAN. Within 30 days after the
Association has provided the City with a copy of the contract(s) for the
construction of Housing Improvements, the City shall disburse the sum of
$764,200.00 (the "Loan") to Dakota County Abstract and Title (the
"Escrow Agent").
DISBURSEMENTS FROM THE LOAN. The Association may obtain
disbursements of the Loan by the Escrow Agent for the Housing
Improvements and the following soft costs: Association's engineering
consultants; City administration fees; legal fees incurred by the City; fees
to be charged by the escrow agent; inspections and fees charged by Dakota
County Community Development Agency (hereinafter the "CDA");
payments to the City's financial advisors, Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
Disbursements shall be made only after the Association has submitted a
disbursement request to and the request has been approved by the CDA.
M
4.
Prior to the commencement of any phase of construction of the Housing.
Improvements, the Association must first coordinate a pre -construction
meeting with the CDA inspection staff and the Contractor. The CDA
inspection staff, Contractor and Association representative will review the
scope of work and final contract amounts, ensure that sufficient funds are
on deposit with the Escrow Agent to complete the Improvements and
establish a disbursement schedule whereby the CDA inspection staff will
inspect the work completed to date and recommend approval of draw
requests to the Escrow Agent. In addition, the CDA will approve all
change orders to the construction contracts and, prior to such approval,
shall determine that the Association has deposited sufficient funds with the
Escrow Agent to complete the work
REPRESENTATiONs BY ASSOCIATION. The Association makes the
following acknowledgments, representations and covenants:
A. The Association has legal authority and power to enter into this
Agreement.
B. The Association will obtain, in a timely manner, all required
permits, licenses and approvals, which must be obtained before the
housing improvements may be constructed
C. The Association will replace the windows and patio doors in each
and every condominium unit.
D. The Association has sufficient reserves to cover the cost of the
Housing Improvements that may be in excess of the Loan.
5. REOUIRED REPORTS. The Association shall, on or before the first day of
each month, provide the City with a report on the status of the Housing
Improvements to the Property.
6. COMPLETION OF HOUSING IMPROVEMENTS. The housing improvements
must be completed on or before August 31, 2007.
7. DEFAULT. Each of the following occurrences shall constitute an event of
default under this Agreement:
A. Association shall fail to perform any of the terms of
conditions to be kept or performed by the Association
under this Agreement;
B. Association shall fail to construct the Housing
Improvements on or before August 31, 2007;
C.. Failure by the Association to undertake the replacement of
windows and patio doors in each and every condominium
unit;
D. Failure to maintain an independent professional
management firm for the operation of the Association; and
E. Failure to deposit funds into the project fund sufficient to
complete the Housing Improvements as determined by the
CDA.
8. REMEDIES. In the event of a default by the Association, the City may, at the
City's option, request that the CDA coordinate completion of the work in default
and seek reimbursement from the Escrow Agent and from the Association for any
costs that exceed the amount of the Loan; or, the City may require that the Escrow
Agent disbursement any unused portions of the Loan to the City.
9.. NOTICES AND DEMANDS. Any notice required or permitted under this
Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when and if
sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, properly
addressed as follows, or such other address as may hereafter be designated
in writing by either of the Parties:
IF TO CITY: City of Eagan
Attn: Jon Hohenstein,
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
WITH A COPY TO: Robert B. Bauer, City Attorney
Severson, Sheldon, Dougherty & Molenda, P.A.
7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, MN 55124
IF TO
ASSOCIATION: Cedar Bluff Townhome Condominium
Association, Inc.
Attn: Jeff Mahoney
Assistant Association Manager
Omega Management
15350 25th Ave. N. Suite 108
Plymouth, MN 55447-1991
10. LAw GOVERNING. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted
under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
CEDAR BLUFF TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, INC.
B �
s,
CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal
corporation
By:
Pat Geagan
Its: Mayor
By:
Maria Petersen
Its: Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �0day of p�`Cnd
2006, by DP t. J�SL APP, C'OL'-�LP— - , the PP$S (b, P C of CEDAR
'BLUFF TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Minnesota non-profit
corporation, on behalf of the non-profit corporation.
j- JEAN�TE ANN JOHNSON
NotPuGlla JOHNSO
YyCanuMamm� B�pHmdm 31.2m
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
[ 3�
FWRIM
�
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
2006, by Pat Geagan and Maria Petersen, the Mayor and Clerk of the CITY OF EAGAN, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
Notary Public
SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
THE CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE CEDAR BLUFFS HOUSING IMPROVEMENT AREA
and
APPROVING THE CEDAR BLUFFS HOUSING EUROVEMENT FEE
December, 2005 City receives Housing Improvement Area application for the Cedar Blu fs Association, including a
petition from at least 51% of the owners.
August 29, 2006 Association submits financial plan and completes application.
September 5, 2006 City Council meets at 6:30 pm. and calls for public hearing on the establishment of the Housing
Improvement Area
September 21, 2006 Notices are mailed to owners (at least 10 days prior to hearing).
September 22, 2006 Date of publication of hearing notice and map (at least 7 days prior to hearing). Publication furred to
Thisweek News on September 20,. 2006.
October 3, 2006 City Council holds public hearing at 630 p.m. on the establishment of the Housing Improvement
Area and approving the Cedar Bluffs Housing Improvement Fee. Following the public hearing,
City Council directs preparation of Ordinance establishing the Housing Improvement Area and the
development agreement.
By Oct 10, 2006 City and Association complete Development Agreement
-)ctober 17, 2006 City Council considers and adopts the Ordinance establishing the Cedar Bluffs Housing
Improvement Area effective on or after November 24, 2006. City Council approves resolution
establishing housiag improvement fee and approves Development Agreement.
October 18, 2006 City sends summary'of ordinance and resolutionand notice of owners' veto rights to each owner.
(Withm five days ofadoptmg ordinance and/or resolution).
By Nov. 16, 2006 Copy of Ordinance sent to the 1Vrmnesota Commissioner of Revenue (within 30 days of adoption).
By Nov. 30, 2006 City certifies housing improvement fee to Dakota County.
December 1, 2006 Housing Improvement Area becomes effective, if there are no owner vetoes or appeals.
December4, 2006 City cancels levy for housing improvement fee tf an appeal is fried
4`
Cedar Bluff Townhomes
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
FREERS
'8 AEEe C1A1 ES INC
Preliminary Estimates for Public Hearing Notices
City of Eagan
Housing Improvement
Project Costs
Concrete/Foundation
Mndows/Patio Doors
Consultant Fee
Contingently
Total Construction Costs
Finance Costs
Capitalized Interest
Soft Costs
Total Project Costs
Less Interest Earnings
HIA Loan Amount
Tenn (years)
Average Rate
Annual Debt Payment
Total Units
Cost/Unit - Annual
CosWnit- Monthly
Assessment - Per/Unit
Breakdown of Soft Costs
Association's Eng. Consultant
City Admin Fee
Legal Fees
Escrow Agent Service
Dakota County CDA Inspections
Financial Advisor
TOTAL
- Cedar Bluff Townhomes
$ 276,000
$ 417,000
in soft costs
$ 40,000
$ 733,000
J
34,900
$ 767,900
2 $ (31687)
$ 764,213
15
3 5.50%
4 $79,254
120
$660.45
$55.04
$ 6,368.44
I Assumes lees levied in 2006 for Initial collection in 2007.
2 Estimate - subject W change- will depend upon construction draws..
3 Estimate - subject W change.
4 Debt Payment is 105% of principal and Interest due. Assumes Wan closes 2-1-2007.
C EE:
Agenda Information Memo
Eagan City Council Meeting
Consent Agenda
October 17, 2006
o
ACTION TO BE
To authorize the preparation of short term lease agreement for Community Action Council — Armful of
Love Program at Cedarvale Mall and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement.
FACTS:
The City of Eagan purchased the Cedarvale Mall on September 1, 2006. A number of the
businesses in the mall have relocated to their new sites and space is vacant at the mall.
While the City does not intend to release the property for general use, it has received a request
from the Community Action Council to house its annual Armful of Love gift donation program in
one of the vacant spaces. The space would be required from late October through the Christmas
holiday.
At its meeting of October 3, 2006, the City Council authorized preparation of a short term lease .
for the former ISD 191 space at the Mall that would cover basic -costs and provide for liability
insurance by the CAC. Staff has determined that the primary additional costs will relate to the
provision of utilities for the property and, following discussions with the property manager and
prior tenant, determined that a monthly rent of $1,000 would be appropriate. This amount has
been discussed with CAC and they aro agreeable to this amount for the two month period from
October 20 to December 20, 2006
ATTACHMENTS:
Lease agreement on pages "I� through 4.
LEASE
This is a legal agreement ("Lease") between the Tenant and the Landlord to rent the
Premises described below. The word LANDLORD as used in this Lease means the EAGAN
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the
"EDA'. The word TENANT as used in this Lease means COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL,
INC., a Minnesota non-profit corporation.
This Lease can be enforced in court against the Landlord or the Tenant if either one of
them does not comply with this Lease.
1. Description of Building. The building is located at property commonly known
as "Cedarvale Mall" (the "Properly') located at 3910 Sibley Memorial Highway in the City of
Eagan, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota (the "Premises"). The term "Premises" also
includes shared use of all common areas in the building and shared use of parking on the
Property.
2. Term of Lease. The term of this Lease is for two months commencing on
October 20, 2006, and ending on December 20, 2006, time being of the essence. Tenant may
terminate this Lease at any time earlier than the end of the term and shall not be liable for
payment of rent beyond the period of occupancy.
3. Rent.
a. Amount. The rent for the Premises is One Thousand and no/100 Dollars
($1,000.00) per month.
4. Acceptance/Quiet Enjoyment. Tenant accepts the condition of the Property and
Premises in an "as -is" condition. If Tenant complies with the provisions of this Lease, Tenant
may use the Premises for the term of this Lease.
5. Use of Premises. The Premises must be used only for Tenant's business and for
no other purpose.
6. Alterations/Removal of Personal Property from the Premises. Tenant may
not make any material alterations to the Premises absent the Landlord's written consent.
7. Damage to Premises. If the Premises is damaged or destroyed, Landlord may
terminate this Lease immediately and may decide not to rebuild the Premises. For purposes of
this paragraph, the' Premises is deemed damaged or destroyed if the Premises is damaged by
more than 25% as determined by the City's Building Inspector.
8. Utilities. Landlord shall pay for all utilities, including electric, gas, water,
etcetera for the Premises; Landlord will not provide phone service.
9. Insurance. Tenant shall, at Tenant's expense, procure liability and personal
property insurance for the term of the Lease listing Landlord as additional insured and
indemnifying Landlord from any claim relating to Tenant's tenancy of the Premises. The amount
of insurance coverage must be approved by Landlord prior to the commencement of the Lease
term. Such insurance shall be provided by an insurance company acceptable to Landlord.
10. , Right of Entry. Landlord and Landlord's agents may, upon prior written notice
to Tenant, enter the Premises at reasonable hours to inspect the Premises and perform any work
that Landlord decides is necessary.
11. Assignment and Subletting. Tenant may not assign this Lease, lease the
Premises to anyone else (sublet), sell this Lease or permit any other person to use the Premises
without the prior consent of the Landlord. If Tenant does, Landlord may terminate this Lease.
Any assignment or sublease made without Landlord's written consent will not be effective.
12. Termination. Tenant shall move out of the Premises when the Lease term ends.
Tenant may not renew the Lease, time being of the essence.
13. Surrender of Premises. When Tenant moves out, Tenant shall leave the
Premises in a "broom clean" condition and as it was when the Lease started.
14. - Abandonment. If Tenant moves out of the Premises before the end of this Lease
and Tenant fails to provide seven ('n days written notice to Landlord, Landlord may bring a legal
action to recover possession of the Premises. if Landlord recovers possession of the Premises
after Tenant moves out, then Landlord may consider Tenant's personal property in the Premises
to also have been abandoned. Landlord may then dispose of the personal property in any legal
manner.
15. Indemnification. Tenant shall indemnify and save harmless Landlord against all
liabilities, damages, claims, fines, penalties, costs and other expenses, which may be imposed
upon, incurred by or asserted against Landlord by reason of all of the following: (a) any use or
condition of the Property or in the building or any part thereof, (b) any personal injury or
property damage occurring on the Property or in the building; (c) any negligence on the part of
Tenant, its agents, contractors, licensees or invitees; (d) any failure to comply with any
requirement of any governmental authority; (e) any prosecution or defense of any suit or other
proceeding in discharging the building or any part thereof from any liens, judgments or
encumbrances created upon or against the same or against Tenam's leasehold estate; (f) any
proceedings in obtaining possession of the Premises after the termination of this Lease by
forfeiture or otherwise; (g) any litigation commenced by or against Tenant to which Landlord is
made a party without any fault on the part of Landlord; (h) any response costs, other damages
and expenses which may be imposed upon, incurred by or asserted against Landlord by reason of
the use, release, threatened release or disposal of Hazardous Wastes at the Premises; and (i) any
failure on the part of Tenant to perform or comply with any covenant or agreement required to be
performed or complied with by Tenant hereunder.
LII:
16. Default. If Tenant violates a term of this Lease and Landlord does not terminate
this Lease or evict Tenant, Landlord may still terminate this Lease and evict Tenant for any other
violation of this Lease.
17. Successors and Assigns. The terms of this Lease apply to the Tenant and
Landlord. The terms of this Lease also apply to any legal representatives and assigns of Tenant
or Landlord
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year first written above..
LANDLORD:
EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal
corporation
By:
Pat Geagan
Its: President
By:
Thomas L. Hedges
Its: Executive Director
TENANT:
COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL, INC.,
a Minnesota non-profit corporation
By:
Its:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
. 2006, by Pat Geagan and Thomas L. Hedges, respectively the
President and Executive Director of the EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY, a Minnesota municipal corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
)ss.
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day. of
, 2006, by the of
COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL, INC., a Minnesota non -profit -corporation, on behalf of the
non-profit corporation.
Notary Public
THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY:
'."TW- :7
SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A.
7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600
Apple Valley, MN 55124
(952)953-8847
(RBB: 206-23508)
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
N. APPROVE FINAL SUBDIVISION OF OLDRE ADDMON
This item has been removed from the agenda.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
O_ PROJECT 942, DEERWOOD DRIVE
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Draft Feasibility Report for Project 942,
Deerwood Drive (Blackhawk Road to Pilot Knob Road — Street Improvements) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on November 21, 2006.
FACTS:
• A structural mill and overlay of Deerwood Drive, from Blackhawk Road to Pilot
Knob Road, in central Eagan is programmed for 2007 in the City of Eagan's 5 -Year
CIP (2007-2011).
On June 6, 2006 the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule for this proposed improvement.
An informational neighborhood meeting will be held with the adjacent property
owners prior to the formal public hearing to review and discuss the proposed
improvements.
• A draft of this Feasibility Report has been prepared and is being presented to the
Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for Tuesday, November
21, 2006.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
P. PROJECT 943, WESCOTT ROAD
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Draft Feasibility Report for Project 943
Wescott Road (Pilot Knob Road to Denmark Avenue — Street Improvements) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on November 21, 2006..
FACTS:
• A structural mill and overlay of Wescott Road, from Pilot Knob Road to Denmark
Avenue, in central Eagan is programmed for 2007 in the City of Eagan's 5 -Year CIP
(2007-2011).
• On June 6, 2006 the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule for this proposed improvement.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be held with the adjacent property
owners prior to a public hearing to review and discuss the proposed improvements.
• A draft of. this Feasibility Report has been prepared and is being presented to the
Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for Tuesday, November
21, 2006.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
51
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
Q. APPROVE PIN CLARIFICATIONS TO FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLLS
CITY PROJECTS 926/ 927/ 932/ 933
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the clarification of the assessment roll
property identification numbers for City Project No.'s 926 (Saddlehorn/ Sunset/
Northview Meadows), 927 (Meadowland/ Suncliffe/ Beaver Dam Road) 932 (Whispering
Woods/ Slater Acres/ Slater Road), and 933 (Town Centre/ O'Leary Lane/ Golfview).
FACTS:
• City Projects 926, 927, 932, and 933 provided for the structural mill and overlay of
numerous various streets within the City.
• On September 5, 2006, the final assessment rolls were presented to the City Council
for each of the respective projects. All notices were published in the legal papers and
sent to all affected property owners informing them of the public hearings.
• On October 3, 2006, a public hearing held for each of the respective projects. Of the
1,064 parcels assessed under the projects, no objections were received. The City
Council approved the assessment rolls and authorized their certification to Dakota
County.
• Subsequent to the public hearings, City staff discovered that the assessment rolls
included with the Public Hearing Council packet did not display the entire property
identification number (PIN) for each parcel. The last 3 digits of the PIN numbers on
the Combined Assessment Roll were inadvertently truncated and were missing.
• All notifications to affected property owners included the full PIN's and provided the
legal notice required.
• This action authorizes City staff to clarify the assessment roll for each project by
revising the PIN's to include the full 10 -digit numbers for each assessed property for
proper recording at the County.
ATTACHMENTS:
Combined Assessment Rolls, City Projects
through,.
926/927/932/933, pages
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment .
Assessment
Variance
10-02500-023-27
Section 25
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-30590-010-01
Golden Meadow Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-30590.020-01
Golden Meadow Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-30590-030-01
Golden Meadow Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.31750-010-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1031750-020-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1031750-030-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-31750-040-01
Haag First
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-41950010-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-41950-020-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041950.030-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041950-040-01
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041950-05001
King Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-010-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-020-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.28
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-030-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-040-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1041951-050-01
King 2nd Addition To Eagan
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.44550010-01
Laurent 1st Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.44550020-01
Laurent 1 a Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010.01
Noithview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100010-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010-03
NorlNew, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010-05
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100010-06
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-010-07
Norlhview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-01
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-03
Northview Meadows
$515.28
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-020-05
NorthviewMeadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100020-06
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
105210002007
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-5210003D-01
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Thursday, October
05, 2006
Page 1 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-52100-030-02
10-52100-030-03
1052100-030-05
1052100.030-06
10-52100-030-07
10-52100.040.01
10.52100.040-02
10521004)40-03
10.52100.040-05
10-521004)40-06
10-52100-040-07
10.52100-050-01
1052100-050-02
10.52100.050-03
10-52100-050-05
10.52100.050.06
10.52100-050-07
10.52100-060-01
10.52100-060-02
1052100.060-03
10.52100-060.04
10-52100.060-05
10.52100.060-07
1032100070-01
10.52100.070-02
10-521 DD -070-03
1032100.070-04
10.52100-070-05
.10.52100.070.07
10.52100.080-01
1052100-060-02
10.52100.060-03
1052100.060-04
10-52100-080-05
10P926
Addition Name
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northvsew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northviaw Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
NodNew Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows .
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NodNew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
NodNew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview.Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Proposed
Assessment
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.28
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
Pending
Assessment
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00.
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
Variance
$164.14
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006r-. r Page 2 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-52100-080-07
1052100.090-01
10.52100-090-02
1052100-090-04
10.52100.090-05
10.52100-090-07
10.52100.100-01
10.52100.100-02
10-52100.100-04
10-52100-10D-05
10.52100.100-07
1052100-110-01
1052100-110-02
10-521oD-110.04
10-52100-110-05
10.52100-11 D-07
10.52100.120-01
10.52700.120-02
1D-52100-120.04
10.52100.120-05
10.52100.120-07'
1 D-52100.130-01
10-52100.130-02
10-52100-130-04
10.52100-130-05
10.52100.130-07
10.5210D•14D-01
1 D-52100.140-02
10-52100.140-04
10-52100.140-05
10.52100.140-07
10-52100-150-01
10-52100.150-02
10.52100.150-04
10P926.
Addition Name
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northvlew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NorthviewMeadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Assessment
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
55
Pending
Assessment
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$880.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$880.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00.
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.OD
Variance
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74.
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
Page 3 ofIO
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10.52100-160-05
10-52100.150-07
10-52100.160-01
10-52100-160-02
10.52100-160.04
10.52100.160-05.
10.52100-160-07
10.52100.170-01
10-52100.170-02
10-52100.170-04
10-52100.170-05
10-52100.170-07
10.52100-180-01
10-52100.180-02
10.52100.180-04
10.52100.180-07
10-52100.190-01
10.52100.190-02
10-52100.190-04
10.52100.190-07
10.52100.200-01
10.52100.209-02
10-52100.200-04
10-62100.200-07
10.52100.210-01
10.52100.210-02
10.52100.210-04
10.52100-219-07
10.52100.220-01
10.52100.220-02
10.52100.220-04
10.52100.220-07
10.52100.230.01
10.52100.230-02
1OP926
Addition Name
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NorthviewMeadows
Northviaw, Meadows
Northviaw Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northviaw Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview, Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
NoMMew Meadows
Northview Meadows
Northview Meadows
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$65.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$595.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00 .
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26.
'$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
' $515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 4 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.52100-230-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-230-07
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-240-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.240.04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74'
1052100-250-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10.52100-250-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100.260.02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
- $164.74
10.52100-260-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-270-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100.270-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.280-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-280-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100-290-02
Northview, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-290-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-300-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
i
10.52100-300-04
Northview, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.310-02.
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.310-04
Northview, Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-320-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.320-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100.330-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.52100-330-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-340-02
Northview Meadows
_ $515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100340-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100350-02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100350-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100360.02
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-52100360-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-370-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100380-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100390-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100-400-04
NorthviewMeadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1052100410-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.0D
$164.74
1052100420-04
Northview Meadows
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Thursday, Odober OS, 2006 Page S of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number IOP926
PID
Addition Name
10.52100430-04
Northview Meadows
10-52100.440-04
Northview Meadows
10-56210-010-01
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210-010-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-010-03
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-020-01
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-020-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-02003
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-030-01
Overview Estates Rapist
105621003002
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-030-03
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210040-01
Overview Estates Rapist '
10-56210.040-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-040-03
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210050-01
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-050-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210050-03
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210060-01
Overview Estates Rapist
10-56210.060-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210060-03
Overview Estates Rapist
105621007001
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210070-02
Overview Estates Rapist
1056210-070-03
Overview Estates Replat
1063400010-01
Revised Northview Meadows
10.63400020-01
Revised Northvlew, Meadows
1pb3400-03001
Revised Northview Meadows
10 -MO -010-02
Saddle Hom
1065800-010-03
Saddle Hom
10.65800-020-01
Saddle Hom
10.65800-020-03
Saddle*Hom
1065800.030-01
Saddle Hom
10.65800-030-02
Saddle Hom
10.6580003003
Saddle Hom
1065800-040-01
Saddle Hom
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
' $680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
'$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
5164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Page 6 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10.65800-040-02
10.65600-040-03
10-65800.050.01
1065800.050-02
10.65800050-03
10.65800.060-01
10.6580006002
10-65800060-03
10165800-070-01.
1065800070.02
10.65800080-02
10.65600-09002
10.85800.100-02
10.65800110-02
10.65800120-02
1072985-01001
1072985-010-02
10-72985-020-01
1072985.020-02
1072985-030-01
1072965-030-02
1072985.040-01
1072985.040-02
10-72985-05001
1072985-05002
1072966-060-01
1072985-060-02
1072995-070-01
1072985-070-02
1072986.010-01
1072986-020-01
1072986-03001
1072986-040.01
1072986.050-01
1OP926
Addition Name
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Hom
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Saddle Horn
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset tat
Sunset tat
Sunset tat
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset 1st
Sunset2nd
Sunset 2nd
Sunset2nd
Sunset 2nd
Sunset2nd
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Assessment
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26'
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
$515.26
Pending
Assessment
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$600.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$680.00
$660.00
$680.00
$680.00
Variance
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
$164.74
Page 7 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
J Assessment
Assessment .
Variance
10-72988.060-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-070-01
Sunsel2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986.080-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-090-01
Sunsel2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-100-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72988-110-01
Sunsel2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-120-01
Sunset 2nd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72987-010-01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$880.00
$164.74
10-72987-020-01
.Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$660.00
'$164.74
10.72987-030-01
Sunset 3rd
$51526
$660.00
$164.74
10-72987-040.01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72987-050-01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
.$680.00
$164.74
10-729874060-01
Sunset 3rd
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-010-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
1042988-010-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72968-01043
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-010-04
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-020-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-020.02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72968-020-03
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-020.04
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-030-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-030-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72988-030-03
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-03004
Sunset 4th
- $515.26
_ $680.00
$164.74
10.729884)40-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72988040-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-050-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-050-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72968-060-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10-72988-060-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-070-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72988-070-02
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72986-080-01
Sunset 4th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
Thursday, October 05, 2006 � Page 8 of 10
(Y/V
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72988-080-02
10.72988-090-01
10-72988-090-02
10-729BB-100-01
10-72988.100-02
10.72988-110-02
10-72988-120-02
10-72988-130-02
10-72988-140-02
10-72988-150-02
10-72988-160-02
10-72991-010-01
10-72991-010-02
10-72991-020-01
10.72991-020-02
10-72991-030-01
10.72991-030-02
10.729914040-01
10-72991-04D-02
10-72991-050-01
10.72991-050-02
10-72992-010-01
1 D-72992-020-01
1 D-72994-010-01
10-72994-020-01
10-72984030-01
10-72994-04D-01
10-72996-010-01
10-72996-022-01
10-72996-023-01
1 D-72996-030-01
10-72996-040-01
10-72996-050-01
10-72997-010-01
1OP926
Addition Name
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th,
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 4th
Sunset 6th,
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 6th
Sunset 7th
Sunset 7th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 9th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 10th
Sunset 11th
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.0D
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
'$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00 -
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.OD
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
$515.26
$580.00
$164.74
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 9 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP926
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-72997-010-02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-020-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-020-02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00'
$164.74
10-72997-030-01
Sunset llth
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-729974030-02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-040-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-040-02
Sunset 111th
$515.26
$660.00
$164.74
10.72997-050-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-050.02
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00.
$164.74
10-72997-060-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-070-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.72997-080-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-090-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-100-01
- Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.06
$164.74
10-72997-110-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-120-01
Sunset 11th
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72997-130-01
Sunset 11th
'$515.26
5680.00
$164.74
10-72997-140-01
Sunset 1lth
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74 .
10-72999-010-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72999.020-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72999-030-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-72999-040-01
Sunset 13th Addition
$515.26 -
$680.00
$164.74
10-74950-010-01
TEM
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10.74950.020-01
TEM
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
10-74950-030-01
TEM
$515.26
$680.00
$164.74
Summary hu''SA_Nbe = 10P926 (330 d6la0 mcads)
Sum
$170,035.80
$224,400.00
$54,364.20
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 10 of 10
sem%
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP927
PID
Addition Name
10-02900-011.25
Section 29
10.48050-001-01
Meadowlands tsl
1048050-002-01
Meadowlands 1st
10-48050-003-01
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050-004-01
Meadowlands tat
10-08050-005-01
Meadowlands list
10-48050.ODS-01
Meadowlands 1st
1048050-007-01
Meadowlands tat
10.48050-006-01
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050-010-03
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050-180-03
Meadowlands tat
1048050-190-03
Meadowlands 1st
10.48050.200-03
Meadowlands 1st
1048050.210-03
Meadowlands 1st
1048050-220-03
Meadowlands 1st
144MSO-230-03
Meadowlands list
1042975.010-00
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-010.02
Sun CIH( tsl
10-72975-010-03
Sun ClI f tat
10-72975=0104)4
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975010.05
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-010-06
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975-011-01
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-012-01
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975020.02
Sun Cliff tat
10.72975020-03
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975-020.04
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-020-05
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-020.06
Sun Cliff tat
1D-72975-021-01
Sun CIHF tat
10-72975022-01
Sun Cliff 1st
10-72975-030-02
Sun Cliff 1st
10.72975-030-03
Sun Cliff tat
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$3,160.92
$4,180.00
$1,019.08
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77.
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$10323
$386.77
$492.OD
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77'
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$2,881.36
$4,200.00
$1,318.64
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 1 of 10
(03
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
IOP927
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.72975-030-04
Sun CIBC 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-030-06
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-031-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-032-01
Sun CIN 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-040-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975.040-03
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-040-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975.041-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975.042-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-050-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-050-03
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-050-04
Sun CIBf list
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72976-051-01
Sun 'MIT lst
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975.052-01
Sun Cliff 1 st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-060.02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-060-04
Sun Cliff 1st.
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-061-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-062-01
Sun Cliff list
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-070-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-070-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-071-01
Sun Cltff 9st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-072-01
Sun Clt f 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-080-01
Sun CIHi 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-080-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-080-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-090-01
Sun MIT 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975-080-02
Sun Cliff 1st
.$388.77
$492.00
$10323
10.72975090-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23.
10.72975100-01
Sun CTBT tst
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975100-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975100-04
Sun CIBf 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975110-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975110-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.72975110-04
Sun CIBi 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05,1006 / ' I Page 1 of 10
AlJ
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP927
Proposed
Fending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.7297&120.01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-120-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-120-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-7297&130-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
.$492.00
$103.23
10.72976-130-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-7297&130.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10.7297&140-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
.147297&140-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-140-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472976-150-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-150-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-150-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-160-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
104206.160-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472976-160-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-72975-170-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-170-02
Sun Cliff 1sl
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-170-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77 -
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-180-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-180-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1472975-180.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
147297&190-01
Sun CIBF 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
147297519002
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-190-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-200-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-200-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-200.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.DD
$103.23
1072975-21001
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
107297&210-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$,103.23
107297&210.04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
10-7297&220-01
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
1072975-220-02
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
107297&220-04
Sun Cliff 1st
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
9072975-230-02
Sun Cliff 1sl
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 3 of 10
(05
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72975.230-04
10-72975240-02
10.72975240-04
10.72975250-04
10.72975260-04
10.72976-010-01
10.72976-010-02
10-72976-01D-03
1072976.010-06
10-72976.020-01
10-72976-020-02
1 D-72976-020-03
10.72976.020-04
10-72976-020-06
10-72976-030-01
10-72976-030-02
10.72976.030-03
10.72976-030-06
10-72976-040-01
10.72976.040-02
10.72976-040.03
10.72975040.06
10.72976-050-01
10-72976-050-02
10.72976.0513-03
10-72976-050-06
1072976-060-01
10.72975060-02
10-72976-060-03
10-72978.060-06
10-72976-070-01
10.72976-070-02
1072976-070-03
1072976-070-06
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun Clift 1st
Sun Cliff 1st
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun CINE 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$358.77.
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
..$103.23
5388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
- $103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23.
. $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
5388,77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388,77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00 _
$103.23
$3811,77
$492.OD
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00.
$103.23
. $3118.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 4 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP927
PID
10-72976-080-01
10.72976-080-02
10.72976-080-03
10-72976-080.06
10.72976-090-01
10.72976.090-02
10-72976-090-03
10.72976-090-06
10-72976-100-01
10-72976-100-02
10-72976-100-03
10-72976-100-06
10-72976-110-01
10.72976-110-02
10-72976-11D-03
10.72976-110-06
10-72976-120-01
10.72976.120-02
1 D-72976.120-03
10-72976-120.06
10.72978-130-01
10.72976-130-03
10.72976-130-06
10-72976-14D-01
1D.72976-140-03
10.72976-140-06
10-72976-150-01
10-72976.150-03
10.72976-150.06
10-72976.160-01
10-72976.160-03
10-72976-160-06
10.72976-170-01
10-72976.170-03
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff tad
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Clift 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Proposed
Assessment
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00.
$492.00
$492.00
$492.OD
$492.00
$492.0D
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
Variance
$103.23
$103.23
.$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 5 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72976.170.06
10.72976-180-01
10.72976-180-03
10.72976-180-08
10.72976.190-01
10.72976-190-03
10.72976-190.06
10.72976.20D-01
10.7297&200-06
ID -72976-210-01
10-72976-210-06
10.72976-220-01
10.72976-220-06
1D-7297&230-01
10.72976-230-06
10-7297&240-06
1 D-72977-001-03
10-72977-002-03
10-72977-003-03
10-72977-004-03
10.72977-005-03
10.72977-006-03
10-72977-007-03
10-72977-008-03
1 D-72977-009-03
10.72977-010-03
10-72977-011-01
10-72977.011-03
1 D-72977-012-01
10.72977-012-03
10.72977-013-03
10-72977-014-03
10.72977-015-03
10.72977-016-03
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun Cliff 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM 2nd
Sun CIM aid
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM Sul
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun CIM 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Proposed
Assessment
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$368.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$386.77
$368.77
$366.77
$388.77
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$16.49
$388.77
$16.49
$388.77
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
$18.49
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
,$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00,
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$492.00
$25.00
$492.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
Variance
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23'
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$103.23
$6.51
$103.23
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
$6.51
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 6 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72977-017-03
10-72977-018-03
10.72977-019-03
10-72977-020-03
10.72977-027-01
10.72977-021-03
10.72977-022-01
10-72977-022-03
10.72977-023-03
10-72977-024-03
10-72977-02,5-03
1 D-72977-026-03
10-72977-027-03
10.72977-028-03
10.72977-029-03
10-72977-030-03
10.72977-031-01
10.72977-031-03'
10.72977-032-01
10-72977-032-03
10.72977-033-03
10.72977-034-03
10.72977-035-03
10-72977-03603
10.72977-037-03
10-72977-038-03
10.72977-039-03
10-72977-040-03
10.72977-041-01
10-72977-041-03
10.72977-042-01
10.72977-042-03
10-72977-04303
10-72977-044-03
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51.
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$386.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.OD
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
• $18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
.$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.OD
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18,49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
.$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.OD
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388,77
$492.00
$103.23
$18,49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18,49
$25.00
$6.51
Thursday, Odober OS, 2006 Page 7 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10.72977-046-03
10-72977-046-03
10-72977-047-03
10-72977-048-03
1D-72977-051-01
10-72977-052-01
10-72978-010-01
1 D-72978-010-02
10-72976-01 D-03
10-72978020-01
10-72978-020-02
10-72978-020-03
10.72978-030-01
10.72978-030-02 '
10-72978-030-03
10-72978.040-01
10-72978-040-02
10-72979040-03
10-72978-050-01
10.7297MSO-02
10.72976-050-03
10-72978-000-01
10.72978-060-02
10.72976.080-03
10-72978-070-02
.10-72978070-03
10-72976-080-02
10-72978-080-03
10.72978-090-02
10-72976-090-03
10-72978.100-02
10.72878.100-03
10-72976-110-02
10.72978.110-03
IOP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun Cliff 3rd
Sun CON 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIBf 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIBf 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Clfff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun MIT 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Clfff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIN 4th
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$16.49
$25.00
$6.51
$18.49
$25.OD
' $6.61.
$18.49
$25.00
$6.51
$388.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00,
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$368.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $386.77
$492.00
$103.23
' $388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.97
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
$386.77
$492.00
$10323
$388.77
$492.00
$103.23
Thursday, Oaobei 05, 2006 Page 8 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
PID
10-72978-120-02
10-72978-120-03
10-72978-130-02
10-72978-130-03
1 D-72978.140-02
10.72978-140-03
10-72978-150-02
10-72978-160-02
10-72978-170-02
10-72978-180-02
10-72979-010-01
1D -72979 -DID -02
10-72979-010-03
10-72979-020-01
10.72979-020-02
10-72979-020-03
10-72979-030-01
10.72979-030.02
1 D-72979.030-03
10-72979.040-01
10-72979-04002
1D-72979-040-03
10-72979-050-01
10-72979-050-02
1D-72979-050-03
1D-7297946"1
10 -72979 -ND -02
1 D-72979-060-03
1 D-72979.070-02
10.72979-070-03
10.72979-080-02
10-72979-080-03
10.72979.090-02
10-72979-090-03
1OP927
Addition Name
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun CIO 4th
Sun CINE 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff Ah
Sun Cliff 4th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Sun Cliff 5th
Sun CINE 5th
Thursday, Odober OS, 2006
i
Proposed
Assessment
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77 .
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$386.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77,
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$3B8.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
$388.77
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
Variance
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$10323
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
Page 9 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP927
Proposed
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
10-72979.100-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979-100-03
Sun Cliff 5th
$368.77
10-72979-110-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
1042979-110-03
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
1D-72979-120-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.120-03
Sun Cliff.5th
$368.77
10-72979-130-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
1042979-130-03
Sun Clift 5th
$388.77
10.72979-140-02
Sun Cliff 5th
- $358.77
10-72979-14003
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.150-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.150-03
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10.72979-160-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$388.77
10-72979.170-02
Sun Cliff 5th
$368.77
.10-72979-180-02
Sun Clift 5th
$388.77
Summery fw'SA_Nbr = 10P927 (320 dete0 records)
. Sum
8111,897.70
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Pending
Assessment
$492.00
$492.OD
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.DD
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
$492.00
8142,420.00
[variance
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$703.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$103.23
$30,522.30
Page 10 of 10
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
10P932
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
[variance
10-03100-012-25
Section 31
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10-03100-012-51
SeGion 31
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-03100-040-55
Section 31
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.12460-010-01
Awad Addition _
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.12450-020-01
Awad Addition
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-16725-010-01
Cedar Heights
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.16725-020-01
Cedar Heights
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-19875-010-01
Deer Rest Pond Addition
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-19875-020-01
Deer Rest Pond Addition
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-010-06'
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-020.06
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.DO
$75.21
10-53550-030.06
Oak Cliff
$551.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.53550.040.06
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.53550-050-04
Oak Cliff
$681.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-050-06
Oak Cliff
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550460.06
Oak Cliff
$681.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-53550-070-00
Oak Cliff
$5,592.60
$5,450.00
($142.60)
10.53552-011-01
Oak Cliff 3rd
$6,352.62
$7,190.00
$637.38
10-53555-010-01
Oak Cliff 6th Addition
$2,595.54
$14,521.00
$11,925.46
10.53556.010-01
Oak Cliff 7th Addition
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10.53557-010-01
Oak Cliff 8th Addition
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10.53558-010-01
Oak Cliff 9th Addition
$100.40
$113.00
$12.60
10-53558-020-01
Oak Cliff 9th Addition
$4,459.74
$5,048.OD
$588.26
10-53575-010-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1D-53575-010-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.63575-010-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1D -53575 -01G -D4
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575-020-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-020-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-020-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1D-53575.020-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575-030-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.60
$13.44
10.53575-030-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
Page 1 of 5
Thursday, Orlober
05, 3006
73
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP932
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessmhttt .
Assessment
Variance
10-53575-030-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-030-04
Oak Cliff Pond -
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-040-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-040-02
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-040-03
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$1344
10-53575.040-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-05041
Oak Cuff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575450-02
Oak Cliff Pond
- $103.56
$117.00
$13.44
106367545043
Oak Cliff Pond
. $103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575450-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.DD
$13.44
10.5357546041
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.06042
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-06043
Oak CINE Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575460.04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.5357647041
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575470-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-63575-08041
Oak CIIff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576.080-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53575-090-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
' 1453575-090-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.100-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.100-04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575-11041
Oak Clfff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.11044
Oak ClI f Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53575.120-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-120.04
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.66
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-130-01
Oak CINE Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053576.130-04
Oak Cliff Pond.
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575-14041
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053576-150-01
Oak ClI f Pond -
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053575.160-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
.$13.44
1053575-170-01
Oak Cliff Pond
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
1053576-01041
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-010-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 2 of 5
Q
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP932
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10.53576-010-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576.010-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44.
111-53576-020-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-020-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-020-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-030-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103:56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-030-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-030-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13'44
10-53576-040-02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-040-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-040-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.66
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576 -OW -02
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-050-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-050-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$163.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-060-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
.. $117.00
$13.44
10-53576-060-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-070-03
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576-070-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53578-0ti0-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10-53576-090-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
.$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.53576.100-04
Oak Cliff Pond 2nd Add
$103.56
$117.00
$13.44
10.58650.010-01
Prairie Oaks
$6,166.20
$6,979.00
$812.80
10.58660-020-01
Praide Oaks
$4,760.88
$5,388.00
$627.12
10-65870.010-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.65870-020.01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.65870-030-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-65870-040-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
1065870-050-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.65870-060-01
St Charles Wood
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.69200-010-00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-09200-020.00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10.69200-030-00
Sisters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-69200.040.00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
10-09200-050-00
Slaters Acres
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
Thursday, October 05, 2006
7:115
Page 3 of
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number IOP932
PID
Addition Name
10-09200.060-00
Slaters Acres
10-69200-090-00
Sisters Acres
1069200.100-00
Sisters Acres
10-692DD-110-00
Sisters Acres
1069200-120-00
Sisters Acres
1D-69200130-00
Slaters Acres
10-09200.140-00
Slaters Acres
10.69200150-00
Sisters Acres '
10.83568-010-01
Wentworth Park
10.83568-020-01
Wentworth Park
10.83568-03D-01
Wentworth Park
10-83568.040-01
Wentworth Park
10$3668-050-01
Wentworth Park
10.83566-06001
Wentworth Parc
10.83568-070-01
Wentworth Park
10-83950-01001
Whispering Woods
10-83950020-01
Whispering Woods
1083950-030-01
Whispering Woods
10-83950-041-01
Whispering Woods
10.83950-050-01
Whispering Woods
10-63950-060-01
Whispering Woods
1083950-070-01
Whispering Woods
10-83950.080-01
Whispering Woods
10.839504090-01
Whispering Woods
1D-83950100-01
Whispering Woods
1083951-010-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951-020-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951-030-01
Whispering Woods Second
1063951-040-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-050-01
Whispering Woods Second
1D-83951-060-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-070-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951.080-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-09001
Whispering Woods Second
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$580.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$7521
$581.79
$667.00
$75.21
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$731.34
$828.00
$96.66
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.DD
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00,
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$561.79
$657.00
$75.21
$561.79
$657.00
$75.21
Page 4 of
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP932
PID
Addition Name
10-83951-100-01
Whispering Woods Second
10.83951-110-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-120-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-130-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-140-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83951-150-01
Whispering Woods Second
10-83952-010-01
Whispering Woods Third
10-83952-010-02
Whispering Woods Third
10.83952-020-01
Whispering Woods Third
10-83952-030-01
Whispering Woods Third
10-83955-010-01
Whispering Woods Sixth
10-83955-010-02
Whispering Woods Sixth
10.83955.031-00
Whispering Woods Sixth
10.83958-010-01
Whispering Woods Ninth
Summaryfor'SA_Nbr= 10P932(149dete0records)
Sum
$657.00
Thursday, Odober 05,1006
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$581.79
$657.00
$75.21
$81,159.89
$102,448.00
$21,288.11
Page 5 of 5
V
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP933
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Variance
PID Addition NameAssessment
10-22477-010-01
Eagan Senior Housing Add
$8,464.00
$10,400.00
$1,936.00
to -22478-012-01
Eagan Senior Housing 2nd Addition
$7,633.51
$9,419.00
$1,785.49
10.28900-010-01
Gatewoods Addition
$10,850.59
$13,319.00
$2,466.41
10.28900-020-01
Gatewoods Addition
$4,317.66
$5,300.00
$982.34
10.72850-010-01
Stuarts First Carriage Green Apartm
$8,686.18
$10,673.00
$1,986.82
10-72851-010-01
Stuarts 2nd
$6,855.84
$8,424.00
$1,568.16
10-769OD-000.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-001-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.002-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-003-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-7690D-004-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$19'32
10-76900-005-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.006-03.
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-7690D.007-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
.$19'32
10.76900-008-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-009-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-010-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-011-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$18'32
10.7690D-012-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-013-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$19'32
10.76900-014.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.015-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.016-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-017-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769D0-018-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106'00
$19'32
10.76900.019-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-020-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-021-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-022-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$66.68
$106'00
$19'32
10.76900.023-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.024-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-025-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos .
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-026-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$108.00
$19.32
Page 1 oj8
77iursday, Odaber 05, 2006
I(J
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP933
Proposed
Pending
PID Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
variance
10-76900-027-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.028-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-029-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-030-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-031-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-032-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00 '
_ $19.32
10-76900-033-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$108.00
$19.32
10-78900-034-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-03503
Tomark Cordage HIVs Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1 D-76900.036-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-037-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-038-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-039-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1 D-76900.040-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900-041-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.042-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-043-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-769OD-044-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32.
10-769DD-045.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.046-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.047-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$108.00
$19.32
10-76900-048-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.OD
$19.32
10-76900.04943
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76gOD-050-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-051-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$88.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-052-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
10-76900-053-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769OD454-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-055-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900.056-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-769OD-057-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-058-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-059.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-060-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 2 of 8
77
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP933
PID Addition Name
10.76900-061-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D -76900-(M-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D-76900-063-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.06443
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-065-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-066-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-067-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
10-76900.066-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D-76900-069-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-070-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-071-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D•7690D-154-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.155-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-769DD456-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.157-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10.76900.158.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-159-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.160-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-161-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1D-76900.162-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.163-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-164-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.165-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-166-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.167-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900468-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-169-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-170-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.171-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.172-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10-76900.173-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.174-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-175-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10-76900-176-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.DD
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.DD
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.01)
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.0D
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$1 MOD
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
• $66.66
$106.DD
$19.32
$86.66
$106.01)
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$66.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 3 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP933
PID Addition Name
10.76900.177-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
10.76904178-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904179-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904180-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1478904181-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904182-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904183-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76904184-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690418543
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904186-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904187-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690418&03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904189-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904190.03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904191-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904192-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904193-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904194-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
1476904195.03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
1476904196-03
Tornark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904197-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690419843
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904199-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
147690420003
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904201-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904202-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476900-203-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904204-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904205-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904206-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
1476904207-03
Tomark Coinage Hills Condos
1476904208-03
Tomark Carriage HMIs Condos
1476904209-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
1476904210-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.DD
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
• $86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
77rursday, Odober 05,1006 Page 4 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP933
Proposed
Pending
PID . Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-76900-211-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.212-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68.
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900.213-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.21403
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos.
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900-215-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.216-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32.
10.76900.217-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.218-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.219-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$.106.00
$19.32
10-76900.220-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.221-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.222-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.223-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$406.00
$19.32
10-76900-224-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.225-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$18.32
10.76900-309-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.310-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769D0.311-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.312-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-769DO-313-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.314-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.315-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.769DD-316-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.317-03
Tomark Cardag4 Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-318-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$105.00
$19.32
10-76900.319-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-78900.320-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.321-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-322-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.323-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.324-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
1D-76900.325-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00 '
$19.32
10-76900-326-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.327-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
Thursday, October 05, 2006 Page 5 of 8
8Z
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 10P933
PID Addition Name
10-76904326-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.329-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.330-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-331-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.332-03
Tomark'Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-333-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
10.76900.334-03
Tomadr Carriage Hills Condos'
10.76900.336-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.336-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.337-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-338-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.339-03.
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-340-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.341-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.342-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.343-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.34403
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-34543 _
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.346-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-347-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10.76900.34843
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.349-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.350-03
Tomark Cordage Hills Condos
10.76900351-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900352-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900-353-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.354-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.355-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.356-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.357-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900-358-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.359-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10.76900.360-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
10-76900.361-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
Thursday, October 05, 2006
Proposed Pending
Assessment Assessment
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$56.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.66
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.66
$106.00
$86.65
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$56.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68
$105.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68'
$106.DD
$86.68
$106.00
$66.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.66
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
$86.68
$106.00
Variance
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32
$1.9.32
$19.32
$19.32
519.32
$19.32
$19.32
$19.32 .
$19.32
Page 6 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
JOP933
Proposed
Pending
PID Addition Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-76900.362-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.363-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-364-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86,68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.365-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-3%-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.367-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.366-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.369-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900-370-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-371-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
' $86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.372-03
Tomark Cartage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.373-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.374-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
ID -7690D-37543
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-376-03 '
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-7690D-377-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.376-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.379-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.380-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.381-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-382-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-383-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10.76900.384-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900.385-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$86.68
$106.00
$19.32
10-76900-386-03
Tomark Carriage Hills Condos
$66.66
$106.00
$19.32
10-77051-01001
Town Centre 100 2nd
$4,501.09
$5,525.00
$1,023.91
1077051-020-01
Town Centre 100 2nd
$7,265.31
$7,290.00
$24.69
1077052-010-01
Town Centre 100 3rd
$6,983.59
$7,478.00
$494.41
1077054-010-01
Town Centre 100 5th Add
$2,549.78
$3,133.00
$583.22
1077054-020-01
Town Centre 100 5th Add
$2,232.38
$2,743.00
$510.62
1077()55-021-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$4,049.57
$4,997.00
$947.43
1077055-030-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$2,822.00
$3,462.0()
$660.00
10-77055-040-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$3,386.40
$4,170.00
$783.60
1077055-041-01
Town Centre 100 6th
$3,372.29
$4,170.00
$797.71
Thursday, Odober 05, 2006 Page 7 of 8
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP933
PID Addition Name
1047057-01D-01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Addkon
10-77057-020.01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon
10.77057-030-01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Addtion
10-77057-040-01
Town Centre 100 Eighth Additon
10.77056-010-01
Town Centre 100 9th Add
10.77059-010-01
Town Centre 100 loth Add
10.77059-011-01
Town Centre 100 1 Oth Add
10-77060010-01
Town Centre 100 11th Add
1077061-010-00
Town Centre 10012th Add
1077063.010-01
Town Centre 10014th Add
1077065-010-01
Town Centre 10016th Add
1077066-010-01
Town Centre 1 OD 17th Add
1077067-010-01
Town Centre 10018th Addition
1077067-02D-01
Town Centre 100 18th Addition
1077068010-01
Town Centre 100 19th Add
Summery tor'SA libe - 1OP933 (252 detail records)
Sam
$1,109.04
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$1,555.26
$1.911.OD
$355.74
'$2,105.42
$2,587.OD
$481.58
$2,031.36
$2,496.00
$464.64
$2,147.74
$2,639.00
$491.26
$3,174.75
$3,917.00
$742.25
. $3,666.60
$4,527.00
$858.40
$3,668.60
$4,527.00
$858.40
$1,425.11
$1,323.OD
($102.11)
$4,740.96
$5,850.00
$1,109.04
$1,411.00
$1,306.OD
($105.00)
$4,289.44
$5,293.00
$1,003.56
$5,517.01
$6,807.00
$1,289.99
$7,083.22
$8,740.00
$1,656.78
$2,977.21
$3,674.OD
$696.79
$4,726.85
$5,832.DD
$1,105.15
$153,735.68
$185,484.00
$31,748.32
Thursday, Odober 05,1006 Page 8 of 8
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. PROJECT 930, SILVER BELL ROAD (PIICOLS TO KENNEBEC)
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 930
(Silver Bell Road - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota
County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 930 provided for the bituminous overlay of Silver Bell Road, from Nicols
Road to Kennebec Drive, in northwest Eagan.
• The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 26, 2006,
with a public hearing scheduled for October 17 to formally present the final costs
associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties.
• The final assessment cost is approximately equal to the estimated benefit amounts that
were presented at the original Public Hearing February 21, 2006.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property
.owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been
received to date. An informational meeting was held on October 12 to address all
property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of
interest. Of .the 64 parcels (10 Single -Family, 49 R4 High Density Residential, and 5
Commercial/ Industrial) being assessed, no one attended the meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, page through.
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES
Number: Project 930 Assessment: October 17, 2006
Name: Silver Bell Road (Nicola to Kennebec) Project Approval Date: February 21, 2006
Mill & Overlay
Final Feasibility
Rate Report Units
SANITARY SEWER
❑ Trunk
❑ Lateral
❑ Service
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
STORM SEWER
❑ Trunk
Final Feasibility
Rate Report Units
WATER
City
Assessed
STREET
❑ Truk
$66.290 F.R.
❑
Gravel Base
❑ Lateral
H
Surfacing/ Signs
High Density Res $11.32 $11.44 / F.F.
Single -Family Res $437.87 443 / Lot
Comm & Indust $15.07 $15.24 1 F.F.
❑ Service
❑
Multi Family Equiv.
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑
C/I Equiv.
❑ WAC
❑
Driveway
OTHER
❑ Service Pair
❑ Installation
❑ Energy Charge
Contract Number of Interest
Number Parcels Terms Rate
06=03 64 5 Years 5.50%
Amount
City
Assessed
Financed
$51.730 F.R.
$66.290 F.R.
$51,173.91
$57,007.09
(F.R = Feasibility Report)
OT"o
City of Eapn Me
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer
Date: October 10, 2006
Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 930
Silver Bell Road (Nicola Road to Kennebec Drive) - Street Overlay
At the public hearing on February 21, 2006, the City Council ordered Project 930, and in accordance with the feasibility
report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay, replacement of traffic and street signage, installation
of major intersection street lights, and replacement of curb and gutter for Silver Bell Road from Nicols Road to Kennebec
Drive, as needed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 500/6 of the cost for the street overlay and signage
improvements adjacent to low density/ single-family residential lots, 75% to high density residential properties, and 100% of
the cost adjacent to commercial/industrial properties, all in accordance with the City Special Assessment Policy. The
improvements were completed under Contract 06-03. The following information was used in the preparation of the
assessment roll for Project 930.
L PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $71,757.92 paid to the contractor for the construction of the improvements and
the cost of the installation of traffic and street signage ($2,344.00) by City forces. The cost of installation of a major
intersection street light at Silver Bell Road and Nicols Road in the amount of $4,700 was paid to Xcel Energy. The cost of an
additional street light proposed in the feasibility report to be installed under this project at Silver Bell Road and Kennebec
Drive is now the responsibility of an adjacent development. Other project costs including engineering, design, contract
management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $28,379.08 were incurred resulting in
an improvement and project cost of $108,181.00. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule L These other
costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment
rate.
IMPROVEMENT
CONSTRUCTION
COST
OTHER COSTS
IMPROVEMENT
COST
FEASIBILITY
REPORT
Street Resurfacing/ Sign
Replace
$46,693.12
$18,878.82
$65,571.94
$66,280
Curb & Gutter Repair
27,408.80
10,500.26
37,909.06
42,190
Major Int. Street Light
$4,700
-0
$4,700
$9,550
Totals
$78,801.92
$29,379.08
$108,181.00
$118,020
If
11. ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment
roll.
B: STREET I1"ROVEMENTS
The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices
and quantities:
Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $65,571.94
C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES
The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of high-density residential, commercial and
offices. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as follows:
1.) Eleven residential equivalent properties within the project area are low-density residential with direct
driveway access to the improved street. 94 feet of residential property is not assessable as the property does
not take access to Silver Bell Road. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density residential
properties, based on a residential street equivalent (32/44) are computed as follows:
UNrr
EXTENDED
rrEM
UNrr
QTY
PRICE
COST
Mobilization
LS
1
$420.00
$420.00
Mill Bituminous Pavement
SY
3,086
1.40
4,320.40
Wearing Course Mixture
TON
884.47
38.91 '
34,414.73
Bit Material for Tack Coat
GAL
550
1.50
825.00
Adjust Water Valve Box - Riser
EA
2
75.00
150.00
Repair Gate Valve Top Sec
EA
1
143.00
143.00
Repair Gate Valve Mid Sec
EA
0
200.00
0.00
Adjust MT -I Frame & Casting
EA
1
295.00
295.00
Remove & Rep Frame & Casting
EA
1
530.00
530.00
4" Solid Line White - Epoxy
LF
0
0.19
0.00
4" Double Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy
LF
2,177
0.40
870.80
Traffic Control
LS
1
630.00
630.00
Traffic Signs
LS
1
2,344.00
2,344.00
SUBTOTAL
$46,693.12
Other costs @ 38.3%
$18,878.82
Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost $65,571.94
C. IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES
The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of high-density residential, commercial and
offices. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as follows:
1.) Eleven residential equivalent properties within the project area are low-density residential with direct
driveway access to the improved street. 94 feet of residential property is not assessable as the property does
not take access to Silver Bell Road. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density residential
properties, based on a residential street equivalent (32/44) are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $65,571.94
Total Low -Density Residential Frontage w/ direct access = 878/ 4,351 (Total F.F.) = 20.2%
Total Improvement Cost (Low -Density) = $65,571.94 x 20.2% x 32/44 = $9,633.11
TOTAL EVIPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$9,633.11
11 Lots
$875.74/Lot
11VIPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$875.74/ Lot X 50% $437.87/Lot
2.)' Four high-density residential properties within the project area (Silver Bell/ Vogepohl Additions) have direct
driveway access to improved street. These parcels are proposed to be assessed based on their common
property's front footage adjacent to Silver Bell Road.The improvement and assessment rates for these
residential properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $65,571.94
Total High -Density Frontage =1,217/ 4,351 (Total F.F.) = 28%
Total Improvement Cost (High -Density) = $65,571.94 x 28% _ $18,360.14
TOTAL IWROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$18,360.14
1,217 F.F.
$15.09/ F.F.
IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$15.09/ F.F. X 75% $11.32/ F.F.
3. Five commercial/ industrial properties within the project area have direct driveway access to the improved
street. These properties are proposed to be assessed based on their front footage adjacent to Silver Bell
Road. The improvement and assessment rates for these properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $65,571.94
Total Frontage (Commercial/ Industrial) = 2,162/ 4,351 (Total F.F.) = 49.7%
Total Improvement Cost (Commercial/ Industrial) = $65,571.94 x 49.7% = $32,589.25
TOTAL EVIPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$32,589.25 2,162 F.F. $15.07/ F.F.
a
D. ASSESSMENT TERMS
The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance.
III CITY REVENUES/ RESPONSIBILITY
] MIPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
Street Resurfacing/ Signs $65,571.94
Curb & Gutter Repair 37,909.06
Major Int. Street Lights 4.700
Total $108,181.00 $51,173.91
FUND AMOUNT
Major Street Fund $52,307.09
Street Light Fund $4,700.00
Reviewed: m Reviewed:
- �— f
Public Works Departmento Finance D artrr
Dated Dated
c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Dougherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
CITY
>PONSIBIL]
$14,398.03
37,909.06
44
($57,007.09)
s:
W f
E
S
NO SCALE
LEGEND
— o ® Assessment Area
Street Improvements
( a p a M N Commercial / Industrial - $15.07/ F.F.
Low Density Residential ( R1.2.3) - $ 437.87/ Lot
960666600 High Density Residential( R4 ) - $11.32/ F.F.
Silver Bell Road
Street Overlay - City Project 930
bill Of EaQ81l
ng Department Final Assessment Map Z
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
IOP930
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
Souse
Nbr Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
1001800-010-79
Section 18
2141
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800-021-79
Section 18
2135
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800-03079
Section 18
2131
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00.
$5.13
10-01800.04079
Section 18
2127
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800-07079
Section 18
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
1001800-08079
Section 18
2139
Slhrer Bell Rd
$437.87'
$443.00
$5.13
1001800-091-79
Section 18
2133
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01800.10079
Section 18
2129
Silver Bell Rd
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
10-01900-011-02
Section 19
$5,608.04
$5,669.00
$62.96
10-01900.04025
Section 19
$1,401.51
$1,417.OD
$15.49
1019600.010-01
Dallas Development
2020
Silver Bell Rd
$12,116.28
$12,253.00
$136.72
10-01400-010-01
Kennealy Addition
. 2115
Silver Bell Rd
$875.74
$886.00
$1026
10-6806001 D-01
Silver Bell
2091
Silver Bell Rd
$6,407.12
$6,475.00.
$67.88
10.68060-020-01
Silver Bell
2095
Silver Bell Rd
$2,399.84
$2,425.00
$25.16
10-71400-020.01
Spencer Addition
$437.87
$443.00
$5.13
1075500.010.00
Tesseract Addition
$5,199.15
$5,258.00
$58.85
1075500-010-01
Tesseract Addition
3800
Tesseract PI
$8,258.36
$8,352.00
$93.64
10-82750-01001
Vogelpohl Addition
2099
Silver Ben Rd
$1,743.28
$1,762.00
$18.72
1082750101-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.85
$0.72
10-82750-102-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13.
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750103-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Ben Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750104.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-105-05
Vogelpohl Addition
-2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750106-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
Friday, October 13, 2006
g3
Page I of 3
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP930
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
House
Nbr Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
10-82750-107-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.111-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
1M2750-112-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-113-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-114-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-115-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-116-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.117-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-201-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750.202-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-203-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-204-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.205-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-206.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750.207-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-208-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-209-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-211-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750.212-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750.213-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-214-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-215-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10-82750-216-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74.
10-82750-217-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
10.82750-301-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Sliver Bell Rd
$70.13
$70.67
$0.74
Friday, October 13, 2006 Page 2 of 3
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number JOP930
PID
Addition Name
HouseNbr Street Name
10-82750-302-05 '
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-62750-303.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-304.05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-305-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-308-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-307-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-308-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-309-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-310-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-311-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750-312-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-313-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10-82750.315-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-317-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
10.82750-319-05
Vogelpohl Addition
2103
Silver Bell Rd
Summary for'SA Nbr' = 1OP930 (64 detail
records)
Sum
Friday, October 13, 2006
Proposed
Pending'
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13
$70.87
$0.74
$70.13.
$70.87
$0.74
$51,174.13
$51,744.00
$569.87
95
Page 3 of
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. PROJECT 931, ART RAHN/ HILLANDALE
STREET OVERLAY IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Final Assessment Roll for Project 931
(Art Rahn/Hillandale Additions - Street Overlay Improvements) and authorize its
certification to Dakota County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 931 provided for the bituminous overlay of the streets within the Art Rahn and
Hillandale Additions neighborhood, north of Diflley Road, east and, west of
Blackhawk Road. The streets included in the project were Kathryn Circle,
Meadowlark Road, and South Meadowlark Road.
• The Final Assessment Roll was presented to the City Council on September 26, 2006,
with a public hearing scheduled for October 17 to formally present the final costs
associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties.
• The final assessment cost is approximately 14% less than the estimated benefit
amounts that were presented at the original Public Hearing December 20, 2005.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property
owners informing them of this public hearing. No written objections have been
received to date. An informational meeting was held on October 12 to address all
property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of
interest. Of the 226 parcels (14 Single -Family and 212 Townhome Residential) being
assessed, no one attended the meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, pages through.
i
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING DATES
Number: Project 931 Assessment: October 17, 2006
Name: Art Rahn/ Hillandale Additions Project Approval Date: December 20, 2005
Mill & Overlay
Final Feasibility
Final
Feasibility
Rate RBDOrt Units
Rate
Reuort Units
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
❑ Energy Charge
❑ Trunk
❑ Trunk
❑ Lateral
Contract Number of
Interest
❑ Service
Cit
Number Parcels
Terms Rete
❑ Lat. Benefittbunk
Financed
06=03 226
5 Years 5.50%
WATER
STREET
❑ Trunk
❑ Gravel Base
❑ Lateral
0 Surfacing/ Signs
Direct Access
Single Family
S435.70
506 / Lot
Townhouse
$102.01
$119 /Lot
❑ Service
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑ WAC
❑ Multi Family Equiv.
❑ C/1 Equiv.
❑ Driveway
OTHER
STREET LIGHTS
❑ Service Pau
❑ Installation
❑ Energy Charge
Contract Number of
Interest
Amount
Cit
Number Parcels
Terms Rete
Assessed
Financed
06=03 226
5 Years 5.50%
$32.300 F.R.
$91.580 F.R.
$27.726.30
$72,580.12
(F.R = Feasibility Report)
'T'
City of Eatan woo
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Russ Matthys, City Engineer
Date: October 10, 2006
Subject: Final Assessment Roll, Project 931
Art Rahn/ Hillandale Additions - Street Overlay
At the public hearing on December 20, 2005, the City Council ordered Project 931, and in accordance with the feasibility
report, the following improvements were constructed: mill and overlay and replacement of traffic and street signage for
Meadowlark Road, South Meadowlark Road, and Kathryn Circle within the Art Rahn and Hillandale Additions, and
replacement of curb and gutter along the same streets as needed. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess 50% of
the street overlay and signage improvements in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy. The improvements
were completed under Contract 06-03. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll for
Project 931.
L PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $72,011.39 paid to the contractor for the construction of the improvements and
the cost of the installation of traffic and street signage ($3,190.66) by City forces. Other costs including engineering, design,
contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $28,295.03 were incurred
resulting in an improvement and project cost of $100,306.42. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule L
These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the
assessment rate.
CONSTRUCTION OTHER COSTS IMPROVEMENT FEASIBH.TTY
COST COST REPORT
Street Resurfacing/ Sign
Replace $39,810.21
Curb & Gutter Repair 32.201.18
Totals $72,01139
IL ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
$15,642.40 $55,452.61 $64,600
12.652.63 44.853.81 $59,280
$28,295.03 $100,306.42 $123,880
No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment
roll.
B. STREET 111APROVEMENTS
The costs of the street overlay and street signage improvements were computed using the following unit prices
and quantities:
32' Wide Bituminous Street Overlay
Mill Bituminous Pavement
Wearing Course Mixture
Bituminous Mat for Tack Coat
Adjust MH Frame & Casting
Adjust MH Casting - Riser
Adjust Water Box - Riser
Traffic Control
Street Signage
SUBTOTAL
Other costs @ 39.29%
Mill & Overlay/ Street Sign Cost
EXTENDED
LS
1
$ 200.00
$ 200.00
SY
3299
1.21
3,99139
TON
834.71
38.75
32,344.92
GAL
475
1.50
712.50
EA
3
295.00
885.00
EA
7
128.00
896.00
EA
2
75.00
150.00
LS
1
630.00
630.00
LS
1
3,190.66
3,190.66
$39,810.21
15,642.40
$55,452.61
C. EAPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT RATES
The assessable properties within the project area include a mixture of low-density single-family and townhouse/
condo residential. The improvement costs and assessment rates for the various properties are computed as
follows:
1. 14 single-family residential properties within the project area (Art Rahn Addition) are low-density residential
with direct driveway access to improved streets. The improvement and assessment rates for these low-density
residential properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $55,452.61
Total Single -Family Residential Frontage = 22%
Total Improvement Cost (Low -Density) = $55,452.61 x 22% = $12,199.57
TOTAL 11"ROVEMENT
COST
$12,199.57
IMPROVEMENT RATE
$871.40/ Lot
ASSESSABLE
UNITS
14 Lots
ASSESSABLE PORTION
X 50%
IMPROVEMENT RATE
$871.40/Lot
ASSESSMENT RATE
$435.70/Lot
2. 212 townhouse/ condominium residential properties within the project area (Hillandale Addition) are low-
density residential with direct driveway access.to improved streets. The improvement and assessment rates
for these residential properties are computed as follows:
Mill & Overlay/ Sign Costs = $55,452.61
Total Residential Frontage= 78%
Total Improvement Cost (Low -Density) = $55,452.61 x 78% = $43,253.04
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$43,253.04
$204.02/ Lot
D. ASSESSMENT TERMS
212 Lots
ASSESSABLE PORTION
X 50%
$204.02/Lot
ASSESSMENT RATE
$102.01/Lot
The assessments are proposed for a term of 5 years. The interest rate is 5.50% per annum on the unpaid balance.
III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY)
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY)
Street Resurfacing/ Signs $55,452.61 $27,726.30 ($27,726.31)
Curb & Gutter Repair 44.853.81 44 853.81
Total $100,306.42 $27,726.30 ($72,580.12)
FUND AMOUNT
Major Street Fund $72,580.12
9�t,-- 01 (b — 10 - O�,
Russ Matthys, P.E.
Reviewed
Public Nforks Department
Dated
c: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Dougherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
l0-(1 �(!
Dated
/01
N
W E
S
NO SCALE
J
T-f�
;C?�J
t (50) (36) CB
ME4DO LARD •
R AD c
(50) II•Ii� N. p,
Art Rahn / Hillandale Additions
City of Equ Assessment Map h
Engineering Department Project 931 'V�
of
Dt
Dt
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 10P931
PID
Addition Name
Souse Nbr
- &reet Name
10.11900-010-01
Art Rahn
1815
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-020-01
Art Rahn
1821
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-030-01
Art Rahn
1827
Kathryn Cir
10-11900.040-01
Art Rahn
1833
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-050-01
Art Rahn
1839
Kathryn Cir
10.11900-060-01
Art Rahn
1845
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-070-01
Art Rahn
1847
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-080-01
Art Rahn
1849
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-090-01
Art Rahn
1850
Kathryn Cir
10-11900.100-01
Art Rahn
1848
Kathryn Cir
• 10-11900-110-01
Art Rahn
1844.
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-120-01
ArtRehn.
1838
Kathryn Cir
10.11900-130-01
Art Rahn
1830
Kathryn Cir
10-11900-140-01
Art Rahn
1820
Kathryn Cir
10.32950-001-03
Hillandale #1
1764
Meadowlark Rd
10-32956-001-04
Hillandale #1
4070
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-002-03
Hillandale #1
1766
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-002.04
Hillandale #1
4072
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-003-03
Hillandale #1
1768
Meadowlark Rd
10.32950.003-04
Hillandale #1
4074
Meadowlark Lane
10-02950-004-03
Hillandale #1
1770
Meadowlark Rd
10.32950.004.04
Hillandale#1
4076
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-005-03
Hillandale #1
1772
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-005-04
Hillandale #1
4078
Meadowlark Lane
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$435.70
$435.70
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
,$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 Page 1 of 9
I b�
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
1OP931
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
1032950-006-03
Hillandale #1
1774
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-006-04
Hillandale #1
4080
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.007-03
Hillandale #1
1776
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01,
$0.00
1032950-007-04
Hillandale #1
4082
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-006-03
Hillandale #1
1776
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-006.04
Hillandale #1
4084
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10=32950-009-03
Hillandale #1
1780
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-009-04
Hillandale #1
4086
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950.010-03
Hillandale #1
1782
Meadowlark Rd
,$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-010-04
Hillandale #1
4088
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-011-03
Hillandale #1
4100
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
. $102.01
$0.00
1032950011-04
Hillandale #1
1755
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-012-03
Hillandale #1
4102
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-012-04
Hillandale #1
1757
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-013-03
Hillandale #1
4104
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
103295001304
Hillandale #1
1759
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-014-03
Hillandale #1
4106
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-014-04
Hillandale #1
1761
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950015-03
Hillandale #1
4108
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950015.04
Hillandale #1
1763
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-016-03
Hillandale #1
4110
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-016-04
Hillandale #1
1765
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-017-03
Hillandale #1
4112
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950017-04
Hillandale #1
1767
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-018.03
Hillandale #1
4114
Meadowlark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October l2, 2006 Page 1 of 9
I ��
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
10-32950-018.04
Hillandale #1
1769
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-019-03
Hillandale #1
4116
Meadowlark lane
10-32950-019-04
Hillandale #1
1771
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-020-03
Hillandale #1
4118
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-020.04
Hillandale #1
1773
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-021-03
Hillandale #1
4120
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-021-04
Hillandale #1
1758
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-022-03
Hillandale #1
4122
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-022-04
Hillandale #1
1760
MeadaMark Ct
10-32950.023-03
Hillandale #1
4124
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-023-04
Hillandale 01
1762
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-024-03
Hillandale #1
4126
Meadowlark Lane
10.32950-024-04
Hillandale #1
1764
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-025-03
Hillandale #1
4128
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-025-04.
Hillandale #1
1766
Meadowlark Cl
1032950-026.03
Hillandale #1
4130
. Meadowlark Lane
1032950-026.04
Hillandale #1
1768
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-027-03
Hillandale #1
4132
Meadowlark Lane
10-32950-027-04
Hillandale #1
1770
Meadowlark Ct
10-32950-028-03
Hillandale #1
4134
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-028-04
Hillandale #1
1772
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-029.03
Hillandale #1
4136
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-029-04
Hillandale #1
1774
Meadowlark Ct
1032950-030-03
Hillandale #1
4138
Meadowlark Lane
1032950-030-04
Hillandale #1
1776
Meadowlark Ct
Proposed
Assessment
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$10201
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
Pending
Assessment
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01_
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
$102.01
Variance
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 1� Page 3 of
-
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number
10P931
Proposed
Pending
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
1032950-031-03
Hillandale #1
1744
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-031-04
Hillandale #1
. 4079
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950.032-03
Hillandale #1
1746
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-032.04
Hillandale #1
4081
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-033-03
Hillandale #1
1748
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-033-04
Hillandale #1
4083
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.034-03
Hillandale #1
1750
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-034-04
Hillandale #1
4085
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-035-03
Hillandale #1
1752
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-035-04
Hillandale #1
4087
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950.036-03
Hillandale #1
1754
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-036-04
Hillandale #1
. 4089
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-037-03
Hillandale #1
1756
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-037-04
Hillandale #1
4091
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-038-03
Hillandale #1
1758
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-038-04
Hillandale #1
4093
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-039-03
Hillandale #1
1760
MeadoMark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-039-04
Hillandale #1
4095
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
1032950-040-03
Hillandale #1
1762
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.040-04
Hillandale #1
4097
Meadowlark Ct
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950-041-03
Hillandale #1
4100.
Skylark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$OA0
1032950-041.04
Hillandale #1
1735
Meadowlark Rd
.$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10.32950.042-03
Hillandale #1
4102
Skylark Lane
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-042-04
Hillandale #1
1737
Meadowlark Rd
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
10-32950-043-03
Hillandale #1
4104
Skylark Lane
$102.01 -
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 Page 4 of 9
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number JOP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
10-32950-043-04
Hillandale #1
1739
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-044.03
Hillandale #1
4106
Skylark Lane
10-32950-044-04
Hillandale #1
1741
Meadowlark Rd
. 10-32950-045-03
Hillandale #1
4108
Skylark Lane
10-32950-045-04
Hillandale #1
1743
Meadowlark Rd
1032950-046-03
Hillandale #1
4110
Skylark Lane
1032950-046.04
Hillandale #1
1745
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-047-03
Hillandale #1
4112
Skylark Lane
10-32950-047-04
Hillandale #1
1747
Meadowlark Rd
1032950-048-03
Hillandale #1
4114
Skylark Lane
1032950-048-04
Hillandale #1
1749
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-049-03
Hillandale #1
4116
Skylark Lane
10-32950-049.04
Hillandale #1
1751
Meadowlark Rd
10-32950-050-03
Hillandale #1
4118
Skylark Lane
1032950-050.04
Hillandale #1
1753
Meadowlark Rd
1032951-010-01
Hillandale #2
4186
Meadowlark Rd
10-32951-010-03
Hillandale #2
4176
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-010-04
Hillandale #2
4172
Meadowlark Way
1032951-010.05
Hillandale #2
4160
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-010.06
Hillandale #2
4152
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-010-07
Hillandale #2
4146
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-010-08
Hillandale #2
4122
Meadowlark Way
1032951-010-09
Hillandale #2
4126
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-020-01
Hillandale #2
4188
Meadowlark Rd
10.32951-020-02
Hillandale #2
4162
Meadowlark Rd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01 ,
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, Odober 12, 2006 I �� Page 5 of 9
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number IOP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
1032951-020-03
Hillandale #2 '
4174
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-04
Hillandale #2
4168
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-05
Hillandale #2
4158
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-020-06
Hillandale #2
4150
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-07
Hillandale #2
4144
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020-08
Hillandale 02
4124
Meadowlark Way
1032951-020.09
Hillandale #2
4130
Meadowlark Way
1032951-030-01
Hillandale #2
4190
Meadowlark Rd
1032951-030-02
Hillandale #2
4180
Meadowlark Rd
1032951-030-03
Hillandale #2
4170
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-030-04
Hillandale #2
4164
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-030-05
Hillandale #2
4156
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-030-06
Hillandale #2
.4148
Meadowtark Way
10-32951-030-07
Hillandale #2
4142
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-030-08
Hillandale #2
4128
Meadowlark Way
1032951-030-09
Hillandale #2
4134
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-040-02 -
Hillandale #2
4178
Meadowlark Rd
103295'1-040-03
Hillandale #2
4166
Meadowlark Way.
10.32951-040.04
Hillandale #2
4162
Meadowlark Way
1032951-040-05
Hillandale #2
4154
Meadowlark Way
1032951-040-08
Hillandale #2
4132
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-040-09
Hillandale #2
4138
Meadowlark Way
10.32951-050-08
Hillandale #2
4136
Meadowlark Way
10-32951-050-09
Hillandale #2
4140
Meadowlark Way
10.32952-010-01
Hillandale #3
4133
Meadowlark Pt
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$10201
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 I Page 6 of 9
1�
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number JOP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
Street Name
10-32952-010-02
Hillandale #3
4147
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-010-03
Hillandale #3
4143
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-010-04
Hillandale #3
4135
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-010-06
Hillandale #3
4118
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010-07
Hillandale #3
4102
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010.08
Hillandale #3
4100
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010.09
Hillandale #3
4074
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-010-10
Hillandale #3
4082
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020-01
Hillandale 93
4129
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-020-02
Hillandale#3
4145
Meadowlark. Pt
10-32952-020-03
Hillandale #3
4141
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-020.04
Hillandale #3
4131
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-020-06
Hillandale #3
4116
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020-07
Hillandale #3
4104
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020-08
Hillandale #3
4098
Meadowlark Rd
10.32952-020-09
Hillandale #3
4076
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-020.10
Hillandale #3
4084
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-030.01
Hillandale #3
4125
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-030-03
Hillandale #3
4139
Meadowlark Pt
10.32952-030-04
Hillandale #3
4127
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-030-06
Hillandale #3
4114
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-030-07
Hillandale #3
4106
Meadowlark Rd
1032952-030-08
Hillandale #3
4096
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-030.09
Hillandale #3
4078
Meadowlark Rd
1032952-030.10
Hillandale #3
4086
Meadowlark Rd
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 Page 7 of 9
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP931
PID
Addition Name
House Nbr
StreetName
10-32952-040-01
Hillandale #3
4121
Meadowlark Pt
10.32952-040-03
Hillandale #3
4137
Meadowlark Pt
10-329524040-04
Hillandale #3
4123
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-040-06
Hillandale #3
4112
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-040-07
Hillandale #3
4108
Meadowlark Rd
1032952.040-08
Hillandale #3
4094
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-040-09
Hillandale #3
4060
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-040-10
Hillandale #3
4088
Meadowlark Rd
1032952-050-04
• Hillandale #3
4119
Meadowlark Pt
10-32952-050.07
Hillandale #3
4110
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-050-08
Hillandale #3
4092
Meadowlark Rd
10-32952-060-04
Hillandale #3
4117
Meadowlark Pt
10.32952-060-08
Hillandale #3
4090
Meadowlark Rd
10.64300-009.04
River Bluff Town
4009
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-013-04
River Bluff Town
4013
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-017-04
River Bluff Town
4017
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-021-04
River Bluff Town
4021
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-025-04
River Bluff Town
4025
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-029.04
River Bluff Town
4029
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-033-04
River Bluff Town
4033
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-037-04
River Bluff Town
4037
• Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-041-04
River Bluff Town
4041
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-045.04
River Bluff Town
4045
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-049-04
River Bluff Town
4049
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-053.04
River Bluff Town
4053
Meadowlark Curve
Proposed
Pending
Assessment
Assessment
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$10201
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$10201
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$10201
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
Thursday, October 12, 2006 I Page 8 of 9
I�
Combined Assessment Roll
Project Number 1OP931 Proposed Pending
Nb S N Assessment Assessment
PID
Aaa=vn Name
use r
trees ame
10-64300-055-04
River Bluff Town
4055
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-056-04
River Bluff Town
4056
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300.059-04
River Bluff Town
4059
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-060-04
River Bluff Town
4060
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-063-04
River Bluff Town
4063
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-064-04
River Bluff Town
4064
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-067-04
River Bluff Town
4067
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300.068-04
River Bluff Town
4068
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-071-04
River Bluff Town
4071
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-072-04
River Bluff Town
4072
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300.075.04
River Bluff Town
4075
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-076.04
River Bluff Town
4076
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-079-04
River Bluff Town
4079
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-080-04-
River Bluff Town
4080
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-083-04
River Bluff Town
4083 -
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-084-04
River Bluff Town
4064
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-087-04
River Bluff Town
4087
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-088-04
River Bluff Town
4086.
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-091-04
River Bluff Town
4091
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300.092-04
River Bluff Town
4092
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-095-04
River Bluff Town
4095
Meadowlark Curve
10-64300-096-04
River Bluff Town
4096
Meadowlark Curve '
10.64300-099-04
River Bluff Town
4099
Meadowlark Curve
10.64300-100-04
River Bluff Town
4100
Meadowlark Curve
Summary f0r'SA_Nbr' = 1OP931 (223 detail fecords)
Sum
$27,419.89
Variance
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$102.01
$102.01
$0.00
$27,419.89 $0.00
Thursday, October 1$1006 Page 9 of 9
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council
VI. OLD BUSINESS
KIR
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve (or reject) the request for a Modification to the conditions of approval regarding
outside storage with the Conditional Use Permit approved for Best Brands on Lot 1, Block 1,
Best Brands rd Addition in the SE '/4 of Section 8.
FACTS:
➢ On June 4, 2002; the City approved a Conditional Use Permit to allow outside storage of
trailers on this site.
➢ One of the conditions of approval required that the storage lot be surfaced with
bituminous asphalt by November 1, 2007.
➢ Best Brands is requesting a three-year extension on the surfacing requirement to
November 1,2010.
➢ Since the 2002 CUP approval, Best Brands has expanded from three to 11 manufacturing
facilities through their acquisition of International Multifoods, Inc. As a result, Best
Brands is now reevaluating the allocation of funds for improvements to all 11 facilities,
including the Eagan facility.
➢ Pursuant to this extension request, City Engineering staff inspected the site on October
10, 2006 and found the existing surfacing material to be satisfactorily maintained, with
little rutting of the gravel and minimal amounts of sediment tracking onto adjacent paved
surfaces.
D A letter from the applicant is attached.
ISSUES: None
ATTACHMENTS (3):
Letter from applicant, page
Approved Site Plan, page 11 _
Conditions of Approval for 2002 CUP, pages through
aa Best Brands Corp.
_- Innovative Products and Service.
Bottom Line Results.
Date: 9/28/06 "."...I
To: Pam Dudziak _ City Planner (iI QCT
City of Eagan, Dakota County, MN
Best Brands, Corp., was issued a conditional use permit by the City of Eagan on June 4`�,
2002. Best Brands has complied with all the conditions set forth in this Conditional Use
Permit (CUP), except for Section J. which states the following:
Section J: The outside storage areas shall be surfaced with bituminous asphalt and include
concrete curb and gutter with required storm drainage provisions, by November 1, 2007 or upon
the extension of the building eastward, whichever occurs earlier."
Since this CUP 2002 was issued, Best Brands' business objectives have changed
significantly with regards to this area and the over all growth of our business. Best
Brands Corp. has made a determination that the extension of the main building eastward
will not take place on or before the November 151, 2007 deadline as stated above.
In March of 2006 Best Brands purchased International Multifoods, Inc. With this
purchase Best Brands organization grew from three manufacturing facilities to eleven
manufacturing facilities located throughout the United States and Canada. The
overwhelming business expansion has caused Best Brands to re-evaluate the allocation of
funds for improvements to all eleven facilities including the one in Eagan, MN.
Best Brands (Eagan's Manufacturing Facility) would like to ask for a 3 year extension to
the completion date stated in the 2002 CUP. This would allow Best Brands, Corp., to
adequately budget for these expensive modifications as outlined in the 2002 CUP. If
granted, Best Brands would by November 1, 2010 have completed the requirements listed
in Section J.
Thank You,
(Lxx
Darwin Schlinger
Plant Engineer, Eagan MN
Best Brands, Corp. 1 Ila 9129/2006
ELI DEN04 MS EXISTING
MALL PACK LIGHTING
DENOTES RE5CYCLEV
i 11
1�6ZTE: MA�,X�,Mbl= BITMIN-4.15 ORIVEKAY
607d2AILERS VAN
LIGHT POLE
MR
BE STORED IN/l . FHIY ------ —DENOTES PROPERTY
LIGHT POLE
Ole
—DENOTES BUILVINS
SETBAI-K LINE
d
IDEN07-S DRAINAGE AREA
.......... ....... DENOTES FVn)RE PROPOSAL
a
TO EXTEND CLASS V AREA
z
co
c
x 7 --DENOTES PENCE LINE
m
_j
(L
0
uj
OF TRAILER STORAGE
TOTAL AREA OF SITE. 7!iSKl SP,
F -
TOTAL AREA OF 1130`38 SF.
TRAILER STORAGE
TRAILERS TO BE Ftsw�w CI.A55
ASSUMED NORTH FROM WLIWN& PRIOR TO SEPT. I. 2002. V DRIVEWAY
% OF STORAGE VS.
TOTAL SITE AREA
ELI DEN04 MS EXISTING
DM40TES CtRpzw
WOODED AR NS)
MALL PACK LIGHTING
DENOTES RE5CYCLEV
VENOI—� 2 HEAD
1�6ZTE: MA�,X�,Mbl= BITMIN-4.15 ORIVEKAY
607d2AILERS VAN
LIGHT POLE
DENOTES OVERHEAD
BE STORED IN/l . FHIY ------ —DENOTES PROPERTY
LIGHT POLE
DENOTES HYDRANT
DM40TES CtRpzw
WOODED AR NS)
DENOTES RE5CYCLEV
1�6ZTE: MA�,X�,Mbl= BITMIN-4.15 ORIVEKAY
607d2AILERS VAN
BE STORED IN/l . FHIY ------ —DENOTES PROPERTY
ARE LINE
r=A,,,,,.
—DENOTES BUILVINS
SETBAI-K LINE
d
IDEN07-S DRAINAGE AREA
.......... ....... DENOTES FVn)RE PROPOSAL
a
TO EXTEND CLASS V AREA
z
co
c
x 7 --DENOTES PENCE LINE
m
—DENOTES BOL)NDRY LINE
0
OF TRAILER STORAGE
w 11
NaM, EXISTING ATTATCHED —DENOTES EXISTING,
TRAILERS TO BE Ftsw�w CI.A55
ASSUMED NORTH FROM WLIWN& PRIOR TO SEPT. I. 2002. V DRIVEWAY
AREA TO ALLOW DETAC!ED TRAILER
STORAGE
------------
SP -1
6[ 1 SITE PLAN T
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF EAGAN
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(des+Q�.�ds
�{�lt3Yl SSp�v�
WHEREAS, Best Brands has complied with all the requirements of the City of Eagan
necessary for obtaining a Conditional Use Permit.
NOW THEREFORE, By order of the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, and subject to the terns and conditions hereof, a Conditional Use Permit is
authorized as follows:
1. Permitting a Conditional Use Permit to allow outdoor storage within the confines
of a "Limited Industrial' zone.
2. Said Conditional Use Permit shall apply to the following described property:
Lot 1, Block 1, Best Brands 2"d Addition
3. Said Conditional Use Permit shall run with the land as long as all conditional use
standards are met.
4. Said Conditional Use Permit shall be subject to conformance with the Eagan City
Code and with the conditions set forth herein to include, but not limited to:
5. . The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of
approval and proof provided to the City.
The CUP shall be continually subject to the following conditions:
A. The existing trailers attached to the building shall be removed and building
permits obtained for restoration of the building by September 1, 2002, to the
satisfaction of the Chief Building Official.
B. No more than 60 trailers shall be stored east of the building at any time, and
no more than 60 trailers shall be stored north of the building at any time. A
revised site plan showing where the individual trailers may be stored shall be
submitted prior to recording of the permit.
C. Concrete pads shall be installed to support the trailer legs in areas of proposed
trailer storage.
D. Landscaping and irrigation shall be installed as shown on the Entrance Detail
plan dated May 1, 2002. The landscaping shall be completed by September
30, 2002.
115
E. All trailers must be stored in an orderly fashion.
F. A revised site plan indicating the storage area for the barrels and for materials
and equipment, showing where the trailers will be stored on the site shall be
submitted.
G. Outdoor material and equipment shall occur only in the area of the existing
concrete pad adjacent to the building and be used for such purpose only as
necessary for changing mechanical equipment within the building. Long term
outdoor storage of mechanical equipment and parts shall not be allowed
longer than 60 days.
H. The applicant shall obtain a grading permit from the City prior to the
construction of the proposed outdoor storage and parking areas. Detailed
plans for this grading work must be prepared and signed by a registered
professional engineer.
I. Recycled asphalt may be used to surface the east outdoor storage area. The
site will be subject to periodic review by city staff for adequacy of the material
to control dust and drainage. The first review will occur two years following
approval of this permit. If the material is determined to be inadequate, the
City will require that it be replaced with bituminous asphalt.
J. The outdoor storage areas shall be surfaced with bituminous asphalt and
including concrete curb and gutter with required storm drainage provisions, by
November 1, 2007 or upon extension of the building eastward, whichever
occurs earlier.
K. The outdoor storage areas shall not be surfaced with gravel base, Class V or
otherwise.
L. All parking and storage areas shall be property maintained to prevent
deterioration.
JCIv
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
NEW BUSINESS
A. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft Water Quality Management Plan
and authorize a 60 day public comment period beginning October 18, 2006, and closing
December 18, 2006.
FACTS:
• On August 1, 2005, the City Council authorized a contract with the firm of
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates to update the comprehensive Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP). On September 20, 2005, the Council appointed
3 citizen representatives, 2 Council members, and one representative each from the
Advisory Planning and Advisory Parks and Recreation Commissions to the 13 -
member Water Quality Management Plan Task Force established to guide
development of the WQMP.
• The purpose of the Water Quality Management Plan is to provide for adequate
protection, preservation and enhancement of water bodies, wetlands and wildlife
habitat and to ensure the quality of lakes, wetlands, and streams meets or exceeds
regional, state, and federal requirements and community expectations.
• The City of Eagan adopted its first WQMP in 1990. In 1996, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency recognized Eagan's program as tops in the nation. Despite a 40 -
percent increase in population since 1990, water quality in the top seven recreational
lakes has stayed the same or improved. In a 2005 scientific survey of City residents,
99 percent said good water quality was very or somewhat important.
• Despite past successes, some lakes will not meet new water quality standards
mandated by state and federal regulations. To stay on top, the City must be able to
evaluate, include, and adapt to changing regional, state, and federal directives for
urban stormwater and wetlands management, in addition to public expectations.
• The objectives of the updated WQMP are to build on the successes of the 1990
WQMP; to consolidate and incorporate relevant policies, plans, and programs
instituted since 1990; and to position the City to address efficiently and effectively
the issues and needs of its surface water resources for the next IS years.
• The City Council is being presented a draft WQMP for acceptance and authorization
of a 2 -month public review from October 18 to December 18, 2006. A Public open
house has been scheduled for November 13, 2006, from 5:00 to 7:00_ p.m. in the
Eagan Room.
• A formal Public Hearing will be held in February, 2007, specifically addressing
wetland management strategies within the WQMP with.a formal decision to adopt or
modify the WQMP expected at the close of the hearing.
ATTACHMENTS:
Executive Summary, under separate cover.
I j�
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. WETLAND DELINEATION — MADELYN WOODS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive and Affirm the Wetland Delineation Report
for Madelyn Woods.
FACTS:
• Yiridian Ventures, LLC has applied for a Preliminary Subdivision (Madelyn Woods)
for the properties addressed as 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, in the NE '/4 of Section 32.
The developer is planning to create 8 single family lots on 6:7 acres.
• A wetland delineation report was submitted as part of the developer's application.
• Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) rules provide that the Local
Government Unit (LGU) is responsible for wetland -related decisions. The rules
allow decision authority to be placed with staff according to procedures established
by the LGU.
• On November 8, 2001, the City Council delegated the decision authority for
exemption, wetland type, wetland boundary, and no -loss determinations to the Water
Resources Coordinator while retaining approval authority for replacement and
wetland banking plans.
• Recent special interests and challenges to wetland -related decisions have resulted in
administrative procedures whereby all authorized staff decisions are formally
reviewed and affirmed by the City Council.
• A wetland delineation report dated August 2006 was submitted by Kjolhaug
Environmental Services Company, Inc. (Professional Wetland Scientist # 0000845)
for this site. The Water Resources Coordinator has field verified and confirmed the
delineation of one wetland. The wetland is not proposed to be impacted by draining,
filling or excavation.
• At its September 18, 2006 meeting, the Advisory Parks Commission recommended
approval of the wetlands delineation report. The report has been reviewed by the
Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Pictometry View, page114 _.
• City of Eagan wetland findings of fact, page 1
Ila
Project Name/#: 06091806
Phone #: 651.675.5300
Location of Project: — — N 32 27N 23W —
'/. '/. '/. Sec. Twp. Range Lot/Block
1. Type of determination requested (check those that apply):
Exemption (WCA Exemption # No -Loss
X Wetland Boundary and Type — Replacement Plan
2. Description of Wetland(s) with proposed impact:
a. Wetland Type (Circular 39) 1 (Cowardin) PEMA
b. Wetland Size UNKNOWN
c. Size of Proposed Impact (acres and square feet) N/A
3. Have sequencing requirements been met? Attach Sequencing Finding of Fact as supporting information.
❑ Yes ❑ No (if no, list why) N/A
4. Is the project consistent with the intent of the comprehensive local water plan and/or the watershed district plan, the
metropolitan surface water management plan and metropolitan groundwater management plan, and local comprehensive
plan and zoning ordinance? []Yes ❑ No (if no, list why) N/A
5. How will the project affect the following wetland functions: N/A
Functions Im t No Impact )move
Floodwater Storage —
Nutrient Assimilation —
Sediment Entrapment —
Groundwater Recharge —
Low Flow Augmentation —
Aesthetics/Recreation —
Shoreland Anchoring —
Wildlife Habitat —
Fisheries Habitat —
Rare Plant/Animal Habitat
Commercial Uses —
6. For replacement plan or no -loss determinations, are wetland functions maintained at an equal or greater level?
❑ Yes ❑ No (if no, list why) N/A
7. Is approval of the activity proposed in item 1. recommended?
® Yes ❑ Yes, with Conditions ❑ No (if no, list why)
If no, why?
Delineation field verified and confirmed, and therefore determined to be acceptable. No wetland impacts proposed. Staff
determination recommended for formal review and affirmation.
8. SIGNATURE
LGU Representative (Dau)
Page 1 of 1 I / ► I
LGU findings of Fectdoc � �'�.J
(August 2005)
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006, Eagan City Council Meeting
C om/Ipjtlm mia
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve (OR direct findings of fact for denial) a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight
single-family lots upon approximately 5 acres for property located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road
in the NE'/, of Section 32, subject to the conditions in the APC minutes.
REQUIRED VOTE FOR APPROVAL: Majority of Council Members Present
FACES:
D The development site is located south of Cliff Road and west of Lenore Lane.
➢ It consists of two unplatted parcels and two outlots.. There are two -single-family homes
present, built in 1956 and 1965, and both are currently served by well and septic.
D Both existing homes are proposed to be removed with the new development.
➢ Access into the site is proposed from Lenore Lane via new public cul-de-sac Ellie Court;
existing driveway access to Cliff Road will be eliminated. Additional right-of-way for
Cliff Road will be dedicated with the plat.
D The development density is 1.6 units per acre. All of the proposed lots meet the
dimensional and size requirements of the R-1 zoning district.
➢ Approval of the wetland delineation report is required prior to subdivision approval. The
wetland delineation report appears separately on this Council agenda
➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 19, 2006 and is
recommending approval.
ISSUES:
➢ Neighbors at the public hearing stated concern with the street access and drainage.
120 DAY AGENCY ACTION DEADLINE: December 14, 2006
ATTACHMENTS (2):
Draft APC minutes on pages121— 11'
Staff report on pages _through
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
September 19, 2006
Page 7 of 11
E. Madelyn Woods
Applicant Name:Viridian Ventures LLC
Location: 1810 & 1836 Cliff Road;
Application: Preliminary Subdivision
A Preliminary Subdivision of 6.70 acres to create 8 single family lots.
File Number: 32 -PS -15-08-06
Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff
report dated September 13, 2006. She noted the background and hi"i C..
Chuck Ryan, Viridian Ventures, LLC acknowledged the uniqueness�f the property and stated
efforts are being made to preserve the trees and woodlands.
Vice Chair Chavez opened the public hearing.
Connie Bailey, 1830 Karis Way stated concerns indEffing: preservation and damage to the oak
trees, wetland and drainage ponds including floodNEPanimal lifer and noise polls
Kay Elleraas, 4615 Lenore Lane stated concern for the Mi in traffic patterns," increase in
teenage drivers, and safety of children. _
Raj Maddali, 4637 Lenore Lane stated
the applicant being incorrect, driveway
and drainage.
Ms. Bailey discussed thE
discussed the direction)
Staff addressed the star
Glenn Huebngg-=: edluni
City Elgiber Russ Mail
City Plad Ridley clari
maintained;4aAtie City's
There being no mer p
the discussion bac-ft
The Advisory Planning=(
and the
the foilowitf name of the proposal and
acess to the pr�erty, right of way, grading,
1 durihg ire super storm in 2000. She
drainage and.access to the property.
and water quality management plan. .
be no impact to the wetland and the buffer will be
Vice Chair Chavez closed the public hearing and turned
discussed various access options along with drainage.
Member Keeley moved, Member Jensen seconded a motion to recommend approval of a
Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family lots upon 6.7 acres located at 1810 and
1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore Lane, in the NE'/. of Section 32 subject to
the following conditions as amended:
The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted
by Council on February 2,1993: Al, B1, B2, B3, B4, C1, C2, C4, D1, and E1
12ti
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
September 19, 2006
Page S of 11
2. The property shall be platted.
3. The developer shall prepare and submit a noise abatement plan lh accordance with
Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15, prior to final subdivision approval.
4. The applicant shall fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of thirty-six
(36) Category B trees (or an equivalent combination of Category A and/or Category C
trees).
5. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan prioeto Final Subdivision
approval that shows the correct placement of tree protection LeVdln.equlred to protect
the critical root zones of all preserved trees. Required Tre�l:ptective measures (i.e.
orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate.���etting), shall be installed
at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Rootxz5ne, 00--h—ever is greater, of
significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site. _
6. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry QjV1si
inspection at least five days prior to the issuaaGE c
compliance with the approved Tree Preservatlt
Protection Fencing.
7. All retaining walls shall be constru( outside the
pond/ wetland areas."
B. All erosion/ sediment control plans sl
be prepared by a designer who has I
Transportation (MNDEGOmining, or
Engineer in desigfll`ng s oT ro ater po
i to set up a pre-cosite
the gwding permit to and '
and utility easements for the
rand grading permits shall
da Department of
as determined by the City
9. All personnerreslMsible foRle installation vEoiosion/ sediment control devices, and the
establishment of vefMtio developr0 ht, shall have received Erosion/Sediment
Control tasgecfgr/Inst�erti#�tTgh the University of Minnesota, or approved
eauaLr1ffffiE�etermlr ed by the CitV—Enaineer.
10. _ . pion control meaams shalM5Mhstalled and maintained in accordance with City code
anUaagineering staaffiJs.
11. The proposed pipe dra mng to the easement area from the development shall be
extended Whe elevati55 of the existing 24 -inch pipe outlet elevation (—elevation 934.8).
12. On-site rate-conan ponding for the development shall provide storage to contain the 100 -
year storm everlt'with a rate of runoff equal to the current pre -development conditions.
13. Stormwater runoff shall be treated on site via one constructed pond. The design and
construction of the treatment ponds and infiltration basins shall satisfy City standards and
criteria. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for that portion of
the site that does not drain to the pond.
14. The wetland delineation report for the site shall be explicitly accepted as submitted.
Advisory Planning Commission Minutes
September 19,2006
Page 9 of 1I
15. All existing well and septic systems on the site, if any, shall be abandoned in accordance
with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development.
16. This development shall dedicate public right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32) as
required by Dakota County.
17.
Plans have been corrected)
18. The entrance monument shall be eliminated or relocated. Alto—Ta an agreement
may be executed with the City that provides for location of tiMponument within the right-
of-way and its maintenance. _
19. This development shall be subject to a cash parks cul trails dedidWjo. on the six new
dwelling units. - —
A vote was taken. All voted in favor. Motion
12q
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 13, 2006
APPLICANT: Viridian Ventures
PROPERTY OWNER: Herb Baker
Dave Klein
REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision
LOCATION: 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road
CASE: 32 -PS -15-08-06
HEARING DATE: September 19, 2006
APPLICATION DATE: August 16, 2006
PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential
ZONING: R-1, Single -Family Residential
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family
lots upon 6.7 acres located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore
Lane, in the NE'/< of Section 32.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
Subdivision:
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission
and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type bf development or use
contemplated.
L5
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Pape 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgment of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds, or similar burden.
I. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on
Solar Access).
That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standardsset forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and
filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality
Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other
information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down
herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as
fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the
public."
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The site consists of two unplatted parcels and two outlots. There is a single-family home on each
of the —2.5 acre parcels. The two outlots were created with the Ridgecliff 1" Addition
subdivision in 1980.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site is wooded and generally slopes to the north toward a wetland on the north -central part of
the site. There are two single-family homes on the property, the easterly home was constructed
l7�
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
in 1956 and the westerly in 1965. Both homes are currently served by well and septic. Both
homes currently have driveway access directly to Cliff Road.
The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the
subject property:
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Proposal — The proposed subdivision consists of consolidating four existing parcels into one
development site and subdividing the site into eight single-family lots. The existing wetland is
proposed to remain. Access is proposed from Lenore Lane via a new public cul-de-sac, Ellie
Court. The two existing homes will be removed and the existing driveway accesses to Cliff
Road will be closed. Dedication of additional right-of-way for Cliff Road is also proposed.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed single-family use is consistent with
surrounding development, which is also single-family. The surrounding area is also zoned R-1,
Single-family Residential.
Airport Noise Considerations — This site lies outside the airport noise policy zones.
Noise Abatement — The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan
prior to final subdivision approval. Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15 states "Where a plat is
located along a freeway, major arterial or other area which generates high volumes of
noise, the subdivider shall be required to prepare a plan to provide noise abatement. Said
plan shall provide for noise abatement through architectural site design, the construction
of earth berms, dense vegetation, walls, or the combination thereof or similar means
which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Such barriers shall be constructed in
accordance with PCA standards for the appropriate land use."
Dens i — The proposed eight lots on 4.96 acres (site area net of rights-of-way) results in a
density of 1.6 units per acre. This is consistent with the 0-4 units per acre identified in the LD,
Low Density residential land use designation.
6�i
Existing Use
Zoning
Land Use Designation
North
Cliff Road/ Single-family,
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
Residential
South
Single-family Residential
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
East
Lenore Lane/ Single-family
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
Residential
West
Single-family Residential
R-1, Single-family
LD, Low Density
Residential
Residential
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Proposal — The proposed subdivision consists of consolidating four existing parcels into one
development site and subdividing the site into eight single-family lots. The existing wetland is
proposed to remain. Access is proposed from Lenore Lane via a new public cul-de-sac, Ellie
Court. The two existing homes will be removed and the existing driveway accesses to Cliff
Road will be closed. Dedication of additional right-of-way for Cliff Road is also proposed.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area — The proposed single-family use is consistent with
surrounding development, which is also single-family. The surrounding area is also zoned R-1,
Single-family Residential.
Airport Noise Considerations — This site lies outside the airport noise policy zones.
Noise Abatement — The developer should prepare and submit a noise abatement plan
prior to final subdivision approval. Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15 states "Where a plat is
located along a freeway, major arterial or other area which generates high volumes of
noise, the subdivider shall be required to prepare a plan to provide noise abatement. Said
plan shall provide for noise abatement through architectural site design, the construction
of earth berms, dense vegetation, walls, or the combination thereof or similar means
which shall be reviewed and approved by the City. Such barriers shall be constructed in
accordance with PCA standards for the appropriate land use."
Dens i — The proposed eight lots on 4.96 acres (site area net of rights-of-way) results in a
density of 1.6 units per acre. This is consistent with the 0-4 units per acre identified in the LD,
Low Density residential land use designation.
6�i
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Paw 4
Lots — Minimum lot standards for the R -I zoning district require 12,000 sq. ft., 85 -foot width at
the front setback line, and 50 feet of frontage on a public street. All of the proposed lots appear
to meet these standards. The proposed lots range in size from 17,583 sq. ft. to 38,293 sq. ft. Lots
6, 7 and 8 will haves, 50 -foot structure setback adjacent to Cliff Road. Lots 6 and 7 are also
constrained by the wetland; the use of retaining walls in the rear yards of Lots 6 and 7 provides a-
20-30 foot gently sloped yard area between the structures and the retaining walls before the lots
drop off to the wetland and ponding areas.
Of the 6.7 -acre site, 1.74 acres is proposed to be dedicated as right-of-way for Cliff Road and the
proposed new cul-de-sac, Ellie Court. A small dedication (<200 s.f.) is also proposed for Lenore
Lane. The resulting net site area is 4.97 acres.
Tree Preservation — A tree inventory submitted with this application indicates that there are two -
hundred forty-four (244) significant trees in the inventory. Individual tree size and species break
down is as follows:
Species Ave
Diameter
Dia. Ranee
Count
Percent of Total
Oak
20"
6"-36"
133
55%
Black Cheng
10"
6"-17"
36
15%
The balance of the tree inventory is comprised of a variety of deciduous trees, including species
such as elm, aspen, maple, crabapple, and cottonwood trees averaging 10" in diameter. There are
also a few, scattered conifer trees (spruce, pine, and fir) located on site.
The development as proposed will result in the removal of one -hundred five (105) of the two -
hundred forty-four (244) significant trees (43.0 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan
Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal
(single-phase, multiple -lot, single -unit residential) is set at 40% of the total significant trees.
With a proposed removal greater than the allowable amount, there is a required tree mitigation of
thirty-six (36) Category B trees.
The applicant has submitted a Tree Mitigation Plan that indicates the installation of fifty-four
(54) Category B trees to fulfill tree mitigation requirements.
Following discussions with the applicant's engineer, staff is recommending that the following
revisions be made to the Tree Preservation Plan. The applicant has indicated that they will
attempt to preserve certain trees (numbers 70, 181, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, and 218) that are
currently shown on the Tree Preservation Plan outside the proposed tree protection- fence area. A
revised Tree Preservation Plan should be submitted that shows the correct placement of required
tree protection fencing. Tree protection fencing should be adjusted on the Tree Preservation Plan
to more accurately reflect grading operations associated with the installation of utilities between
Lots 7 and 8, and Lots 1 and 2. Tree number 1 is located off-site, and therefore should be
removed from the counted tree inventory.
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Grading! TWoUNhy/ Erosion Control — The preliminary grading plan is acceptable with
modifications. The site is heavily wooded majority of the site slopes toward the north edge of the
site to a wetland near Cliff Road (County Road 32).
Grading for the proposed pond and house pads near the existing wetland will require retaining
walls (2'-6' high). These retaining walls should be constructed outside the drainage and utility
easements for the pond/ wetland areas.
A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan should be prepared in
accordance with current City standards and codes prior to final plat and planned development
approval. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits
should be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City
Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans. Also, all personnel responsible for
the installation of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the establishment of vegetation for the
development, should have received Erosion/Sediment Control Inspector/Installer certification
through the University of Minnesota, or approved equal training as determined by the City
Engineer. Erosion control measures should be installed and maintained in accordance with City
code and engineering standards.
Storm Drainage —The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable with modifications. A large
majority of the storm water runoff from the development is proposed to drain via public storm
sewer to a new storm water pond along the northwest comer of the development on Lot 6. The
pond will then flow to the existing wetland on the site (Pond BP -32.2 as designated by the City
Storm Water Management Plan). This wetland will then drain to an existing easement area
within Ridgecliffe 18` Addition, platted in 1980. This easement area has an existing 24 -inch pipe
outlet that provides for drainage to the east. The proposed pipe draining to the easement area
from the development should be extended to the elevation of the existing 24 -inch pipe outlet
elevation (—elevation 934.8). The on-site ponding for the development should provide storage to
contain the 100 -year storm event with a rate of runoff equal to the current pre -development
conditions.
Water Ouality — This proposed subdivision is in the upper end of the City's B -Watershed, which
contains Thomas and Blackhawk lakes. The developer proposes to address City stormwater
quality requirements partially by constructing one pond, which would pre -treat runoff from some
of the parcel before it drains to the onsite wetland. The remainder of the parcel that does not
drain to the treatment pond would be subject to water quality cash dedication.
Wetlands — A wetland delineation report for the project site (Kjolhaug Environmental Services
Company, Inc.; KES Project No. 2005-297) identifies one wetland that is subject to the City's
jurisdiction, according to the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Any proposals to
drain, fill, or excavate this wetland need to meet all provisions of WCA laws and rules.
� 19
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Page 6
The developer is not proposing to impact this wetland by any of these means. This wetland,
however, would be a "General Use" wetland within the proposed management classification
system of the Water Quality Management Plan that is now being drafted. This type of wetland
would receive the lowest protection regarding impact avoidance, buffer widths, and replacement
standards.
The developer is proposing to provide a 15 -foot setback from development structures (i.e.,
retaining wall). Both the wetland and stormwater pond would be included within a storm
drainage and utility easement provided to the City.
Utilities — The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Existing sanitary sewer and water main of
sufficient size, depth and capacity is available within Lenore Lane to the east for connection and
extension by the development.
All existing well and septic systems on the site, if any, should be abandoned in accordance with
Dakota County and City standards as part of this development.
Streets/ Access — Public street access is proposed via new 480 -foot cul-de-sac, Ellie Court, which
will intersect with Lenore Lane about 100 feet south of Cliff Road. With 8 proposed homes, this
development is estimated to generate about 80 total vehicle trips per day (in/out). Public street
access is not available from Cliff Road (County Road 32) because of Dakota County's access
spacing guidelines and the availability of City street access to Lenore Lane.
Pedestrian access from the cul-de-sac will be provided with the construction of a public trail
from the intersection of Ellie Court and Lenore Lane to the existing trail along the south side of
Cliff Road.
Easements/ Permits/ Right -of- — The preliminary plat is not acceptable as submitted. The
Dakota County Plat Commission has reviewed this preliminary plat and has indicated that this
development is required to dedicate 100 feet of right-of-way from the centerline of Cliff Road.
The preliminary plat does not show this dedication on proposed Lot 8, where an additional 25
feet of right-of-way is required to meet the County requirements. This development should
dedicate public right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32) as required by Dakota County.
This additional right-of-way dedication will create building setback issues for the house pad on
Lot 8 as proposed. Please see the "Setbacks" portion of this report.
Financial Obligation — At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel proposed for
platting.
Based upon a study by City staff of the financial obligations collected in the past and proposed
use for the property, the following estimated charges will be collected at time of final subdivision
or connection to the City's utility system. The final charges will be computed using the rates in
effect at time of connection or subdivision. The estimated financial obligation is subject to
15D
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Paae 7
change based upon the areas, dimensions and -land uses contained in the final subdivision or plat,
with due allowances for easements and right-of-way required with the plat.
Based upon a study by City staff of the financial obligations collected in the past and proposed
use for the property, the following estimated charges will be collected at time of final subdivision
or connection to the City's utility system. The final charges will be computed using the rates in
effect at time of connection or subdivision. The estimated financial obligation is subject to
change based upon the areas, dimensions and land uses contained in the final subdivision or plat,
with due allowances for easements and right-of-way required with the plat.
Improvement
Use
Rate
Ouanti
Amount
Sanitary Sewer Lateral
RI
$27.60/F.F.
109 F.F.
$3,008.40
Water Lateral
Rl
$27.85/ F.F.
350 F.F.
$9,747.50
Storm Sewer Trunk
Rl
$0.103/ S.F.
245,242 S.F.
$25,260.00
Total $38,015.90
Setbacks/Bulk Standards — This development is subject to R-1 zoning setbacks. R-1 minimum
setbacks are:
• Front yard (Cliff Road) — 50 feet
• Front yard (Lenore Lane /Ellie Court) — 30 feet
• Side yard (house) —10 feet
• Side yard (garage/accessory structure — 5 feet
• Rear yard —15 feet
• Building coverage cannot exceed 20% of the lot area
The site plan shows conceptual building footprints that satisfy these setback requirements. A
specific building plan for Lot 4 has been provided and also meets the R-1 setbacks. However,
with the dedication of right-of-way for Cliff Road required by the County, the conceptual house
on Lot 8 does not satisfy the required 50 foot setback. The resulting buildable area of Lot 8 is
significantly constrained and irregular in shape, making its viability questionable. The applicant
should provide a plan demonstrating that Lot 8 is buildable with the additional dedication of
right-of-way, or modify the subdivision to incorporate Lot 8 into adjacent Lot 7.
The Site Plan shows what appears to be an entrance monument south of Ellie Court at Lenore
Lane. This location is unacceptable as it is within the public right-of-way. The monument
should be eliminated or relocated. Alternatively, an agreement may be executed with the City to
provide for location of such a structure within the right-of-way and its maintenance.
Parks and Recreation — This development will be subject to a cash parks and trails dedication on
the six new dwelling units, payable at the time of final plat at the rates then in effect. The 2006
park dedication rate is $3,278 per lot/unit, and the trail dedication rate is $238 per lot/unit.
13�
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family
lots upon 6.7 acres located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore
Lane, in the NE '/4 of Section 32. There site contains two single-family homes and a wetland.
The proposed subdivision consists of subdividing the site into eight single-family lots. Access is
proposed from Lenore Lane via a new public cul-de-sac, Ellie Court. The two existing homes
will be removed and the existing driveway accesses to Cliff Road will be closed.
The proposed development is subject to R-1 zoning standards. The final plat will need to
dedicate additional right-of-way for Cliff Road as required by Dakota County. As a result, the
viability of Lot 8 is questionable given the setback constraints and lot shape. Because of the
proximity to a major arterial, CliffRoad,.the developer should provide a sound abatement plan
identifying how roadway noise will be mitigated for these new homes. The development is
subject to cash parks and trails dedications.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To recommend approval of a Preliminary Subdivision to create eight single-family lots upon
6.7 acres located at 1810 and 1836 Cliff Road, south of Cliff Road west of Lenore Lane, in the
NE'/4 of Section 32. If approved, the following conditions should apply.
1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted
by Council on February 2,1993: Al, Bl, B2, B3, B4, Cl, C2, C4, Dl, and El
2. The property shall be platted.
3. The developer shall prepare and submit a noise abatement plan in accordance with
Chapter 13.20, Subd. 15, prior to final subdivision approval.
4. The applicant shall fulfill tree mitigation requirements through the installation of thirty-
six (36) Category B trees (or an equivalent combination of Category A and/or Category C
trees).
5. The applicant shall submit a revised Tree Preservation Plan prior to Final Subdivision
approval that shows the, correct placement of tree protection fencing required to protect
the critical root zones of all preserved trees. Required Tree Protective measures (i.e.
orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting), shall be installed
at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of
significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site.
1 371-�
Planning Report —Madelyn woods
September 19, 2006
Page 9
6. The applicant shall contact the City Forestry Division to set up a pre -construction site
inspection at least five days prior to the issuance of the grading permit to ensure
compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree
Protection Fencing.
7. All retaining walls shall be constructed outside the drainage and utility easements for the
pond/ wetland areas.
8. All erosion/ sediment control plans submitted for development and grading permits shall
be prepared by a designer who has received current Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT) training, or approved equal training as determined by the City
Engineer in designing stormwater pollution prevention plans.
9. All personnel responsible for the installation of erosion/ sediment control devices, and the
establishment of vegetation for the development, shall have received Erosion/Sediment
Control Inspector/Installer certification through the University of Minnesota, or approved
equal training as determined by the City Engineer.
10. Erosion control measures shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City code
and engineering standards.
11. The proposed pipe draining to the easement area from the development shall be extended
to the elevation of the existing 24 -inch pipe outlet elevation (elevation 934.8). .
12. On-site rate -control ponding for the development shall provide storage to contain the 100 -
year storm event with a rate of runoff equal to the current pre -development conditions.
13. Stormwater runoff shall be treated on site via one constructed pond. The design and
construction of the treatment ponds and infiltration basins shall satisfy City standards and
criteria. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site ponding shall be required for that portion of
the site that does not drain to the pond.
14. The wetland delineation report for the site shall be explicitly accepted as submitted.
15. All existing well and septic systems on the site, if any, shall be abandoned in accordance
with Dakota County and City standards as part of this development.
16. This development shall dedicate public right-of-way along Cliff Road (County Road 32)
as required by Dakota County.
17. Prior to Final Subdivision approval, the applicant shall provide a plan demonstrating that
Lot 8 is buildable with the additional dedication of right-of-way for Cliff Road, or modify
the subdivision to incorporate Lot 8 into adjacent Lot 7.
in
Planning Report — Madelyn Woods
September 19, 2006
Pase 10
18. The entrance monument shall be eliminated or relocated. Alternatively, an agreement
may be executed with the City that provides for location of the monument within the
right-of-way and its maintenance.
19. This development shall be subject to a cash parks and trails dedication on the six new
dwelling units.
FAII
GALA%IE AVENUE
I �
r
----- r-----T-----T----_—T\
,eyggeBeCL•c
Le
-
Sr
ta
I
I,
W
C
R4.
_-x_
-----�'-- -------
PRELIM. PLAT
en
•, pi
e
M
A
0
rill
rL_
OUTLOT A
auo
I
LENORE LANE
-J
rw
LANE��aT4;
i 19 I
I v.
3
Ph
a
0
y
I �
r
,eyggeBeCL•c
Le
-
Sr
R4.
I^;
PRELIM. PLAT
3
Ph
a
0
y
------- i
n
u
III
III �
I II C I
IIIA I
III •i
.--_
/
I
s
II;•i'1
r
LZf
J
• %F
/
1
07
B Z
I
j I
L
I
'T
II
I I
iW I
—_i
I%
II
Il
� � �
III
� j`�•
�—
GALA%IE AVENUE
n
u
III
III �
I II C I
IIIA I
III •i
----r
HT1 -----
/
I
s
II;•i'1
r
LZf
Ili >
1I
• %F
/
1
07
B Z
'T
2.,.0
1 I ,
—_i
I%
GALA%IE AVENUE
n
u
III
III �
I II C I
IIIA I
III •i
----r
HT1 -----
v�
I
s
II;•i'1
r
LZf
Ili >
1I
• %F
/
A..l
07
B Z
`IA
w
ro
/ 1
�l,ry^i I r
4 LANE_-
IV
/y
\
�oaF��ii�� I I
7�•I W I I I
I_ 1 I I
I� zI II
n
u
III
III �
I II C I
IIIA I
III •i
_
1
i•-
1 I Icl
I 1N iL7 .
1 I I'I
i 1 •
1 � —
v�
I
s
II;•i'1
/ I
Ili >
1I
/
A..l
07
B Z
'T
2.,.0
1 I ,
—_i
I%
SITE PLAN
IV
/y
\
�oaF��ii�� I I
7�•I W I I I
I_ 1 I I
I� zI II
n
u
III
III �
I II C I
IIIA I
III •i
_
1
i•-
1 I Icl
I 1N iL7 .
1 I I'I
i 1 •
1 � —
---� I I
Jill a>
I
Ill
II;•i'1
/ I
Ili >
1I
/
'T
1 I ,
—_i
I%
111
1
� � �
III
� j`�•
�—
Ilim
ro`•,
--A----�
;. 1
1 i
II
I
1111
1
; I:
iii
I mALF: 2
II I
I It
I I :e•
\
\I
1
I I
III
1 I :17
L
�1 r
r �
ENORE LANE
IALF: 1
:q
— — _ — — _ _ _ — ` — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J
------------------------------------------------------
VIN
�
?I x =
E � I _ it
�
a
t
1
n
11
11
11
11
11
u
n
u
I 1. ♦ n
LANE
4
11 V
— t ! GRADING PLANJwAzrjf "DAY
I
GR.DING rr/r HEDLUND r''•':"""-'
�.-
I ' �
I 1. ♦ n
LANE
4
11 V
— t ! GRADING PLANJwAzrjf "DAY
I
GR.DING rr/r HEDLUND r''•':"""-'
�.-
------r------ri----.TI1"_'r--I—:
��' 11
yEDLUND
m nn as �'Y wwave
I
�T\
i I
10
r /r6 o J �'w l�'-• r i'
.u;>.It
11
�
l-4,. I .I •�'.
�/,•``•cL��ly `� ••`\.I
Iii
_�^
�'��' IJ'r.r\t�/ I I, l` :J y) ? I
;
�.�K�N. tvN •I � �I .Li..���lll
G
=� I
� � 'Sj--' 11-! - rr�� �,
� ♦ ...... ... #.. I
iii
�
�
�
� it
I i'a:. �
't 1f.
�•
�• rn
�c
It
I i ii
s► eft —s�+�i � • >t 'Ti+" � � ��������`q,
`� / - ala.. •Yr.', �, ~jhh.: / `' ... " `/ /f M
Jif
�
�.�� I i 11•i-" 1.11` It -+s i' •�� ;,r
1
LANE
I
1
W
1 �I Nw.u�il
F,ROSION CONTROL
I
ice/ L•��,i�
i I{jl
;M4A
:•I
an03lOA' CONTROL PLN
yEDLUND
m nn as �'Y wwave
I
;M4A
:•I
P
I
IM
------ -------------- ♦ ---------
- 7 s
I •' ull I
PI a,/:•I
J � 7 I\ � I ♦ � - � � I
I �J I
p
/ I
L. I / J II_ _ 4
L—I'
R a me •.�
Al I
4
:`rl
• z•ZS� 1 �` � `d
gM I' I
iia
a p...
M z i
cz
�D
07.1Zo .
UTILITY PLAN
SII 'J1:•�
II -
I
1
,I
i I .c•
i I iii
1
L /
r �
851f.•r LANE
E''IJ
IBLK S
c•
6.
I!I}IIIS I F1 'ff j.!•{0®stl. opal.•g Ei � O
��11�7'�I I �II I�3�Ii.{0®.a..fzl.•6 e.
fill
I If/D6L7T7 •ODDS �W YYI.-.r..4 ��..1
� a D77LIlYFIJN HEDLUND :�":�::�=�=Y i
µ r �—
•'•'�
I I �O
rl
-r•1 I •-ti.
I I A
L—I'
R a me •.�
Al I
4
:`rl
• z•ZS� 1 �` � `d
gM I' I
iia
a p...
M z i
cz
�D
07.1Zo .
UTILITY PLAN
SII 'J1:•�
II -
I
1
,I
i I .c•
i I iii
1
L /
r �
851f.•r LANE
E''IJ
IBLK S
c•
6.
I!I}IIIS I F1 'ff j.!•{0®stl. opal.•g Ei � O
��11�7'�I I �II I�3�Ii.{0®.a..fzl.•6 e.
fill
I If/D6L7T7 •ODDS �W YYI.-.r..4 ��..1
� a D77LIlYFIJN HEDLUND :�":�::�=�=Y i
µ r �—
� I
m.. i
II
/
L—I'
R a me •.�
Al I
4
:`rl
• z•ZS� 1 �` � `d
gM I' I
iia
a p...
M z i
cz
�D
07.1Zo .
UTILITY PLAN
SII 'J1:•�
II -
I
1
,I
i I .c•
i I iii
1
L /
r �
851f.•r LANE
E''IJ
IBLK S
c•
6.
I!I}IIIS I F1 'ff j.!•{0®stl. opal.•g Ei � O
��11�7'�I I �II I�3�Ii.{0®.a..fzl.•6 e.
fill
I If/D6L7T7 •ODDS �W YYI.-.r..4 ��..1
� a D77LIlYFIJN HEDLUND :�":�::�=�=Y i
µ r �—
- - ---.------------
;, ,.. -' e �� � -• - ' 11. %�: III i .-•
�1 J IP ♦ �I f I ry. �. ,Z�,'-'/r,.:
jn�.,`AI'
.�-I �,.. ��,\ � •!-'-� II,'' i • ;,;' ,. • / �;:.v4•'' ' I ._.iT f,:.. L_ .1 I, z I '•dc
_-7 I•. �_\ ' ,_; I�_ I _ Y�.' � .`, k..r...... moi.... _! ''1.J- III -I
-
as
1
.41
4'QN I Y 13.•. ) :g �'' IIIS
—1 -`� y; ._T � ..F.9 d moi, /II I , , .�' ��) �:.. IIS �11 � I^..IS•;[
A� ..'�'. , '.� 'i..7 I :III 1 i• I -,a
-Irl 11 ',�'�� �'t`� .�� a l:`�,: <6 r .11 II•L 1 .'�.-
/'(•_� /{• ,,Y n +.31>K:i?:Y6..i4 ; l�/ it
v `T.M w •� ��� � iii ',' I 1 I `�'\ i .
4,
4IC J,It
' 3 .; If )1, 'p T, .:' j;G •{" ' X i f I iii 1 — —
fj
/
fFy ?.
/..,,; /.,. r. /: Ya. e� Q.7 ..'. III 1 •I � ..
)q g • 4 a',',•bY' � •»�. 'III 1 I �:
ILI
- \ / ter•- ,`'+` A 1' j4' —'R�f \�.. 4<��,,ij ,� LANE' .
�..` i l 4-� l I W• j 1. a_ �„_ \..._ .:�•,• _'.. _ �✓'� ,
LI` 19LF:rrl cm
jIIII pp m
l0�1111 ������I���II•'�TI•{b®.o•oO:seep � � O
' w
RON m
+ i EXISTING CONDITIONSMAULM "US
Yasr"a QQNQIP s PLAP
HEDLUND �
I IM.I.W AIFLW � ♦• �W1�iWMW. � .M.�'6 WM!� W.IA. IC. IHII
------------- ---------------------------
neI Avian%IMII e
__---•(•—_—_ �T{---_-711._-.
pr 1 I s 1
444
71
,I
N Pc j.. i
', 8lnfudmt{Inlul¢I{Idlulddw.iu i�lnlp
fff d ............i»_..l.l»
........ ....
y�j nnnnnmXrlllndfamnldammlwrdrnn
$R1 wwnlrhllmunnmudmmm' dnma
� �� ft{{{8i�{I{tii9i(ltl{{fIR81{�{�+l�Igl{�II
1 .� ommmfain(ndnanlfuiwnwrtfunua
• .:. I.. ............. ..................
9 _. ....11._..1...1.....7 ..._I
.I....... ........ .:....... - ..........
:__._
TREE PRESERVATION . , _,....._:.._......
- IIIIIfrg111111191q.11glfla.glqldln1l 111:
MAMM
V I
I= fSZRVA "'L" HEDLU/I
w oar.. y�a�,)wawa�mwa
I n.9 o-nw01re r..'Pi4d11'In•w�'a100
AI
i3l.F: 2
1
loll
i 1 F• �
I� i tiyi7 1,
I 1 c -
t'
1
11 1 ,`�...•1• 1
i
r LANNE '
/ Il A ••�N
+~�It IF F• •�
t:7 ffjlCt
1puunalinlld.il.{uuu*li.lu.d.gle.dl�a✓,1 m
:L::::.::i,.l...r.-Ff•IIIP'IJ.I..YITj.X T•�•?( i�1!
p.....«...z...i..i.:......... e.:..:..i.::.:...... lf
I�Imnnnnnmrngnnuml�Ilmnlhdr 1. ndlw{ a.'� `�
IAnl:nnl4.nnmrdnnrdr�.gn14. %nNINr1!Iwl ` y9
qln;nnl(it{:Nfll�i{9iiilii�nj�;i`{fl" ri
Idmnnl.mumnmmndrduuiauunuuaral s' yy®��
dN......•......n'............-.............. �i
-----------------------
----------- �� ------------
I !: 1I1
_ 'G ' %��' : 1 .'fi'':: r� ('Sud • i.,S...m.
iI r-•._'. _.�,..• ter. _ _ -
Af
TREE MITIGATION jw
1
p 1 11
it t-7
I 1 i
I %r) SLK 2
LANE
r=t
,C• t- ?:
I :r.
Ph
N
g � y
rxss ,mf:1f90N PlAf! HEDLU/VD m.-.. �" - -
I �.: ••• -gym W�
�`.il
III
m
lid
TREE MITIGATION jw
1
p 1 11
it t-7
I 1 i
I %r) SLK 2
LANE
r=t
,C• t- ?:
I :r.
Ph
N
g � y
rxss ,mf:1f90N PlAf! HEDLU/VD m.-.. �" - -
I �.: ••• -gym W�
Project Description for Proposed Madelyn Woods
We are proposing to adjoin the two properties located at 1810 Cliff
Road and 1836 Cliff Road. Combined these properties are six plus
acres.. The two existing properties currently have driveways that
access directly to Cliff Road from the south.
We are proposing to subdivide these adjoined properties into a
Development of eight single family lots in a Cul-de-sac design.
The new street would enter from the west side of Lenore Lane
(Located to the east of the Project) and proceed westerly into the
new proposed Cul-de-sac. .
The two existing homes will be removed and the existing
driveways will no longer enter from Cliff Road.
We understand that the zoning would likely allow more than eight
lots. We chose to subdivide into only eight lots in order to best
preserve the natural setting of trees. We intend to market this
project as an upscale neighborhood.
R'Ce�ved S-l�ue
1�5
Agenda Information Memo
October 17, 2006 Eagan City Council Meeting
D. LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) — CITY OF EAGAN
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To adopt a Negative Declaration on the need for a Lone Oak Business Campus
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the 85 acre property located north of Lone
Oak Road and west of Inver Grove Heights in the SE'/e of Section 1.
FACTS:
➢ The scope of the Lone Business Campus proposal attains the threshold for a
mandatory EAW.
➢ The property owner, Scenic Enterprises, prepared the bulk of a draft EAW (SRF
Consulting Group prepared the traffic analysis) for review by City staff and the
City's consultant, SRF Consulting Group. The draft EAW was submitted to the
Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on September November 1, 2004.
➢ The EQB published the EAW Availability Notice in the EQB Monitor on
September 11, 2006, initiating the 30 day Comment Period. The EAW Comment
Period ended October 11, 2006.
➢ Comments were received from Dakota County, the DNR, MnDOT, MPCA and
the Met Council. The Findings of Fact state and respond to the four factors to be
considered under Minnesota rules to determine the adequacy of an EAW/need for
an EIS. Based on all available information, City staff and the City's consultant,
SRF, believe an EIS is not warranted for this project.
➢ The EAW Response Package includes an introduction, Findings of Fact,
responses to comments made and the comment letters received.
➢ Some comments were not received until late Thursday, staff will complete the
review of the comments and prepare responses for the Response Package that will
be delivered to the City Council on Monday with Additional Information.
ATTACHMENTS: (1)
The EAW Response package will be distributed on Monday (10/16/06).
lqfo
• ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
OCTOBER 179 2006
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
• DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .
Item 1. Redevelopment District Update
Item 2. Development/Construction Activity
149
•
City of Wan Ycno
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2006
SUBJECT: ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA / OCTOBER 17, 2006 CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY ATTORNEY
The City Council reserves the right to schedule an Executive Session for matters of pending or
threatened litigation or matters of union negotiations or certain labor matters. There is no Executive
Session to be scheduled at this time.
CITY ADMINISTRATOR
There are no items at this time.
is DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
There are no items at this time.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Item 1. Redevelopment District Update — Staff is providing regular updates to the City Council
regarding the City's redevelopment districts as a part of each administrative agenda In addition to
the information enclosed ori pages through Lct& staff will be available to provide
comments or respond to questions relative to the redevelopment projects at Tuesday's meeting.
Item 2. Development/Construction Activity — Per the Council's request, Community
Development staff will provide bi-weekly updates of larger development and construction activity.
The current update is enclosed on page(.
• /s/ Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
/4
•
Citi of Wan �eoo
TO: TOM HEDGES, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
FROM: JON HOHENSTEIN, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 2006
SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ACTIVITY UPDATE
The following update reflects activity in the City's redevelopment districts.
Cedar Grove Redevelopment District
• Cedarvale Mall Acquisition - The City took possessionof the mall on September 1, 2006.
Staff continues to work with remaining mall tenants on relocation planning and assistance.
• First Phase Development Plans — The EDA has approved a three month extension of deadlines
for submission of Phase I concept plans, development applications, notification of intent to
proceed and their purchase of the mall property. Staff will update the Council in late October
regarding the status of resubmittals and plan to present information in that regard to the Council
in November.
• Silver Bell Center Remodeling — The building permits have been issued to permit the
improvements for the relocation of the Cedarvale Barbers, Mike's Shoe Repair, Cedarvale
Tailors and Burton's Frame Shop to Silver Bell Center. Mike's and Cedarvale Tailors have •
moved and Cedarvale Barbers and Burtons are expected to move in November.
• Acquisition and Relocation Plans — Staff has received an appraisal from Ellingson and
Associates and is continuing negotiations for that acquisition. The City is waiting for an
appraisal from Steve Martin, owner of the former Mr. Steak property. Staff has also discussed
possible acquisition with the owners of the Sinclair Station and Kelly Plourde Sales. Several
other property owners are actively seeking new sites for their businesses.
• Communications Activities — The Cedar Grove Gateway, the monthly newsletter update, is
being distributed to businesses in the area. Website updates also continue.
• Transit Update -
Northeast Eagan Redevelopment District
• McGough Office Project — The City Attorney's office has had appraisals of the four
remaining properties in the Blue. Gentian area prepared and has forwarded offers to the
owners for consideration of negotiated acquisition in advance of an eminent domain action.
• Hwy 55 Parcels — DART has submitted a draft concept plan and preliminary application for
financing assistance to begin the staff process of reviewing a possible formal proposal for
consideration by the City Council and EDA. A project must be pursued in the next nine
months before the five year rule is reached.
• Grand Oaks Development — Constriction is complete on first office building, retail center
and bank building. Construction is also underway on the Grand Oak 11 office building on the
former site of the TMI building.
• TMI Relocation Assistance Appeal — The hearing officer has held a conference call with
TMI and City representatives and has communicated expectations for a presentation of claims
and a hearing in January or February of 2007. •
mil
• Southeast Ear -an Renovation and Renewal District
• The City Council approved the resolutions authorizing the creation of the district on June 20.
Staff has scheduled negotiations of a development agreement with Revestors relative to
assistance with extraordinary costs associated with the first phase of the Red Pine Crossing
development.
11
General Redevelopment
• Impact of Eminent Domain Legislation on Redevelopment Districts — In consideration of the
2006 law changes, staff, Ehlers and Associates and the City Attorney will develop a property
acquisition plan for the two Eagan Redevelopment Districts that were in place prior to February
1, 2006. Acquisition must occur within five years of the certification of the district, which will
be August 8, 2007 in the case of the Northeast Eagan District and July 22, 2008 in the case of the
Cedar Grove District
/SD
0
City of Eapn 116
TO: Jon Hohenstein, Community Development Director
FROM: Dale Schoeppner, Chief Building Official
Mike Ridley, City Planner
DATE: October 9, 2006
SUBJECT: Development/Construction Activity Update
The following update reflects recent activity in the Building and Planning Divisions.
Permits Issued
Address Business Name/TV Valuation Type
2864 Hwy 55 Time Out Restaurant 480,000 Comm Impr
1980 Seneca Rd Freightmasters 100,000 Comm Impr •
Development Update
➢ A staff person each from Planning, Parks and Engineering attended the
Blue Cross/Blue Shield Active Living Grant kickoff meeting at the Lebanon
Hills Regional Park Visitor Center on September 26th. The agencies of
Apple Valley, Eagan, Rosemount and Dakota County make up this local
grant recipient group.
➢ Revestors has closed on the 2 acre parcel (former Manley property) at the
southwest corner of Red Pine and Biscayne; they will be submitting plans at
some point in the future to expand the Red Pine Crossings development to
that corner.
Staff will be happy to provide a brief overview of these items and/or respond to questions at
Tuesdays meeting. As always, staff is available between meetings to respond to questions that may
come to Council members' attention from the community.
A
)SI w=uldmgAotivilyReports/CorwerchlReports for CC-10N91M
•
City of Eagan Yeo
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 2006
SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION / OCTOBER 17, 2006 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
NEW BUSINESS
D. Lone Oak Business Campus Environment Assessment Worksheet — Attached for City
Council review is a copy of the EAW Response Package that includes an Introduction, Findings
of Fact, responses to comment letters received referenced as pages 146A through 146FF.
•
/s/ Thomas L. Hedees
City Administrator
0
LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS
EAW RESPONSE PACKAGE
• October 16, 2006
1. INTRODUCTION
The package includes materials for City Council consideration and deliberation on the
proposed Lone Oak Business Campus EAW. Following is some background information
on the project and the EAW process.
The Lone Oak Business Campus is a proposed commercial development, involving the
construction of 644,000 square feet of office space, plus 32,000 square feet of warehouse,
3,058 surface and 180 underground parking spaces. The site is north of Ione Oak Road at
the eastern corporate limit of the city of Eagan.
The project developer, Jim Deanovic, prepared a draft EAW for review by the City staff
and the City's consultant, SRF Consulting Group, Inc. The staff -approved EAW was
submitted to the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) on September 1, 2006. The EQB
published the EAW Availability Notice in the EQB Monitor on September 11, 2006,
initiating a 30 -day Comment Period. The EAW Comment Period ended on October 11,
2006.
• Included in this package you will find the following materials for your review:
U
❖ Findings of Fact regarding the need for an EIS
❖ Written comments received during the EAW Comment Period, with written responses
to substantive comments.
2. FINDINGS OF FACT
After an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) has been prepared for a project
and the 30 -day comment period expires, the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) must
determine whether the effects of the project are significant enough to warrant preparation
of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). For the Lone Oak Business Campus, the
City of Eagan is the RGU.
The Environmental Review Rules provide that the RGU "base its decision regarding the
need for an EIS and the proposed scope on the information gathered during the EAW
process and the comments received on the EAW." Minn. Rules Chapter 4410.1700,
Subpart 3. The completeness (identification of all issues) and adequacy (issue discussion)
of the EAW are key to the EIS decision. These two components are addressed as
follows:
Page 1 10/16/2006
14& A
Issue Identification
Based on knowledge of the project and the Eagan land use and transportation plans, the •
Lone Oak Business Campus EAW has addressed the potential environmental issues
associated with the project. The comments received during the EAW comment.period
address the issues discussed in the EAW and did not raise any new issues.
The key issues addressed by the EAW include the following:
Shoreland: A portion of the proposed project lies within the City's Shoreland Overlay
District, as noted in the EAW. Shoreland ordinance compliance was not specifically
addressed in the EAW as it has yet to be addressed though the Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) process. The need for a CUP was noted in the EAW. Notification of the MnDNR
will be required as part of the CUP.
Wetlands: A thorough wetland impact analysis was prepared for the project and
summarized in the EAW. Of the 14.4 acres of wetland on the site, approximately 1. 14
acres (7.9%) will be impacted by the project. Impacts will be replaced on-site at the
required 2:1 replacement ratio. The Gun Club Watershed District will review the project
under the requirements of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act.
Surface water runoff and potential for water quality impacts: Grading and Drainage
Plans were included in the EAW, along with peak discharge rates for anticipated runoff.
In response to a comment by the MnDNR, the project proposer provided additional data
on runoff volume (see section 3 of this document). Erosion and sedimentation controls •
were thoroughly discussed in the EAW and are subject to regulation by the MPCA under
the NPDES permit process. The project proposer will continue to work with City staff
through the project approval process to ensure that stormwater runoff is properly
managed.
Traffix. A traffic study was completed for the proposed project by the City's consultant,
SRF Consulting Group, to evaluate traffic impacts at key intersections and recommend
improvements necessary to support the proposed Lone Oak Business Campus
development and other future developments in the northeast area in the City of Eagan, as
well as the northwest area in the City of Inver Grove Heights. The study takes into
consideration the previous Northeast Eagan Area Wide Traffic Study, dated May 6, 2005.
The traffic analysis for year 2007 conditions assumes that the following developments
will be constructed:
- Lone Oak Business Campus
- Grand Oaks 5a` Addition
- Oakview Center (hotel only)
- CSM (#5)
- Laukka-Beck (school only)
The projected volumes were analyzed assuming the existing roadway network. 2007 peak •
hour capacity analysis results indicate that all intersections are expected to operate at
Page 2 n 10/16/2006
acceptable levels of service during the am. and p.m. peak hours. Consistent with the
2005 Traffic Study, the EAW traffic analysis assumes the following improvements:
• - Construct an additional eastbound and westbound through lane on TH 55 between
TH 149 (N) and TH 149 (S)
- Construct an additional eastbound left -turn lane on TH 55 at Lone Oak Road
Neither of these improvements are presently programmed or scheduled for construction.
Currently, the Dakota County North/South Corridor study is being conducted for the area
surrounding the project site in Eagan and Inver Grove Heights. Results of this study will
provide forecast traffic volumes from a regional perspective, which will inform decisions
on roadway improvements needed in the area. The City will work with Dakota County,
Mn/DOT and the Federal Highway Administration to identify priority projects and
determine'possible funding sources for needed improvements. The project proposer will
likely need to participate in funding a portion of the improvements, which will be
negotiated as part of the City's approval process.
Access: The current site plan depicts four direct access points along Lone Oak Road. The
main site access roadway is proposed as a temporary cul-de-sac on the northern end, with
future plans to develop a north -south roadway connection to O'Neil Road. It should be
noted that Lone Oak Road is a county highway (CSAH 26) so access to this roadway will
require review and approval by Dakota County. According to Dakota County access
spacing guidelines, it is possible that one full -access and two right-in/right-out access
points will be allowed along Lone Oak Road. However, the two limited access points
• will likely function as full -access driveways until the roadway is upgraded to a four -lane,
divided highway. The project will require review under the Dakota County Contiguous
Plat Ordinance prior to City approval.
Cultural Resources: The Minnesota Historic Society was contacted for comments on the
potential impacts of the project. No comments were submitted by the MHS regarding the
presence of cultural resources at.the site.
❖ Adequacy of Discussion
The EAW adequately addresses the issues presented. The comments received and the
responses to the comments expanded the information base relating to the identified
issues. In combination, it appears that all of the issues identified in the EAW have been
addressed with adequate responsive fact and discussion.
❖ Consideration of Factors
The Environmental Review Rules at Minn. Rules Chapter 4410.1700, Subpart 7 also
provides the following guidance:
"In deciding whether a project has the potential for,signif cant environmental
effects, the following factors shall be considered:
• A. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects;
B. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects;
Page 3 �� 10/16/2006
C. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by on-
going public regulatory authority, and;
D. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as •
a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public
agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs."
The following discussion serves as Findings of Fact in relation to the factors identified in
the environmental review rules relating to EIS preparation:
A. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects
Each of the key issues (identified in the previous section of this document) was
adequately addressed in the EAW and responses to comments. Mitigation measures have
either been identified or will be developed as part of the design and project approval
process. An appropriate level of technical analysis was completed to determine that none
of the issues pose a potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, an EIS is
not warranted under this criterion.
B. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects
The EAW identifies a number of potential areas of cumulative impacts that could occur
as the area develops in the future; however; there is adequate protection of these
resources through on-going agency oversight to conclude that significant adverse impacts
are not anticipated and an EIS is not warranted under this criterion.
C. Extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by on-going, •
public regulatory authority
Each of the key issues is subject to on-going public regulatory authority through local,
county, state and federal approval processes. Therefore, an EIS is not warranted under
this criterion.
D. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a
result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the
project proposer, including other EISs.
The environmental effects of this project are well understood and similar effects have
been studied on a variety of other projects in the metro area. Mitigation measures are
available for all potential effects and will be regulated by public agencies with
jurisdiction over affected resources. Therefore, an EIS is not warranted under this
criterion.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the anticipated environmental effects of the project identified in the EAW,
along with comments received during the 30 -day comment period, have been evaluated
using the criteria set forth in Minnesota EQB rules. The City of Eagan has concluded
that, based upon these criteria, the proposed Lone Oak Business Campus development
does not have the potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, an
Environmental Impact Statement will not be required for the project. •
Page 4 1�� 10/16/2006
3. COMMENTS RECEIVED DURING EAW COMMENT PERIOD,
WITH WRITTEN RESPONSES TO SUBSTANTIVE COMMENTS
During the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) 30 -day comment period, 5
comment letters were received by the City of Eagan. The comments contained in these
letters have been addressed as follows, with copies of each comment letter included at the
end of this section.
LETTER 1: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
❖ EAW Item No. 6. Description
Noted, coverage in Figure 2 is incorrect. Area on Figure 3 better spatially represents the
project area site.
❖ EAW Item No. 10, Cover Types
While the City does not have jurisdiction of wood disposal from private land, the project
proposer will be encouraged to contact the MnDNR to discuss their comment.
❖ EAW Item No. 14, Water -Related Land Use Management District
The project will be reviewed and conform with the City's Shoreland Overlay District
zoning regulations. Presently, the site plan proposes 39 percent impervious coverage in
the Shoreland Overlay District. The ordinance limits impervious coverage to 25 percent
• for commercial development in the shoreland of a General Development Lake but states
that such coverage may be increased with a Conditional Use Permit:
"Impervious surface coverage of lots must not exceed 25 percent of the lot. This may be
increased provided the city has approved and implemented a community -wide
stormwater management plan affecting the subject site, granted a conditional use permit
permitting an increase in impervious coverage, and required the necessary water quality
mitigation features to meet non -degradation standards for phosphorous for the nearest
downstream recreational water body identified in the Eagan Water Quality Management
Plan. "
The City Council will consider this issue as part of the Conditional Use Permit process.
MnDNR notification is required as part of this process and the agency's comments will
be considered in the City Council's Conditional Use Permit decision.
❖ EAW Item No. 17, Water Ouality: Surface Water Runoff
The existing and proposed drainage models were analyzed to determine
changes in water level bounce to, DNR Waters 54P and 256W.
Information from the Eagan SWMP was used to determine 54P and 256W
pond storage and overall drainage area. The existing and proposed bounce
for each DNR water body were analyzed based on the 1 -year, 2 -year, 5 -
year, 10 -year, and 24-hour storm events. .
The proposed bounce will be within 0.5 foot or less for each DNR water
. for each storm event with the exception of the 54P 100 -year event. The
Page 5 �� 10/16/2006
I
54P proposed bounce will be below 1 foot based on the 100 -year. The
expected increases of bounce should not cause significant impact to either
water body. Rate -restrictive orifices are intended to be placed in each •
proposed pond to limit downstream impacts and protect downstream
waters. Detailed HydroCAD models are on file with the City. Also on
file with the City are the select Eagan SWMP figures and tables which
were used to obtain the DNR waters 54P and 256W data for this study.
LETTER 2: MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
No items for review or comment were detailed in the agency's letter. The City is aware
of MPCA's permit requirements, as noted in the EAW, and will ensure that the developer
complies with these requirements.
LETTER 3: MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (Mn/DOT)
❖ Traffic
Mn/DOT's letter raises several important issues regarding anticipated traffic growth,
potential impacts on the state highway system and roadway improvements assumed by
the EAW traffic analysis. The City recognizes that development in the northeastern
portion of Eagan, as well as northwestern Inver Grove Heights, will result in significant
pressure on the area's transportation system. Several traffic studies have been completed
in the area and the Dakota County North/South Corridor Study is currently underway.
The City is committed to working with Mn/DOT, the County, Inver Grove Heights and
FHWA to address transportation system concerns and identify appropriate improvements. •
Timing and funding issues will be part of these on going discussions.
❖ Traffic analysis section of EAW
Mn/DOT's letter notes that the I-35E/Lone Oak Road (CSAR 26) interchange is not
addressed by the traffic analysis in the EAW. This interchange is not in the study area for
the traffic analysis as it is approximately two miles west of the project site and would be
served by other regional roadways including TH 55, TH 149 and I-494. The traffic
analysis does include the I-494/TH 149 interchange and concludes that the ramp
intersections will experience an acceptable level of service in both 2007 and 2017.
The traffic analysis completed for the EAW was coordinated with previous studies in the
area and, and far as the City knows, this analysis is consistent with the assumptions used
in other traffic assessments.
•'• Permits
The project does not appear to impact any Mn/DOT right of way.
LETTER 4: METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
❖ EAW Item No. 8. Permits and Approvals Required •
The City is aware of the Metropolitan Council's requirements for sanitary sewer
extensions and will comply as recommended.
Page 6 /4(OF 10/16/2006
❖ EAW Item No. 17, Water Ouality — Surface Ouality Runoff
The City concurs with the Metropolitan Council's recommendations regarding low -
impact design development techniques and will work with the project proposer to
implement appropriate measures to minimize runoff impacts.
LETTER 5: DAKOTA COUNTY
Site Access
The City and the project proposer are aware that the proposed project will require review
under the Dakota County Contiguous Plat Ordinance prior to City approval and will work
with the County on appropriate location and spacing of access points to the site.
6• Traffic
Dakota County's letter raises several important comments regarding the traffic analysis
completed for the EAW. The letter notes that 6,086 peak hour trips will be generated by
this development at full build out. To clarify, this figure is the total for all developments
anticipated in the area by 2017. The Lone Oak Business Campus project, which is the
subject of this EAW, will generate 1,012 peak hour trips in 2007.
The traffic analysis is attached at the end of the EAW and follows the practices
recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. It includes the first year of
the proposed project (2007) and ten years after the initial development (2017), which are
practical timeframes for assessing transportation system needs. A 20 year forecast, which
• is typically required in federal environmental documents, is not required for an EAW.
While the improvements on CSAH 26 are not in the current CIP, both the cities and the
County have agreed to include this project in their CIP for 2011. The project will include
widening of CSAH 26 to a four -lane divided highway from TH 55 in Eagan to CR 63 in
Inver Grove Heights.
The City is currently working with the County on the Dakota County North/South
Corridor Study, which will inform decisions on roadway improvements needed in the
area. The City is committed to working with the County, Mn/DOT, Inver Grove Heights
and FHWA to address transportation system concerns and identify appropriate
improvements. Timing and funding issues will be part of these ongoing discussions.
4- Environmental
If a potentially contaminated site, storage tank or well is found during this project,
appropriate steps will be taken to address the issue. Coordination with utilities will be
the responsibility of the project proposer. Wetlands were thoroughly addressed in the
EAW, which noted that impacts will be replaced on-site at the required 2:1 replacement
ratio. The Gun Club Watershed District will review the project under the requirements of
the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act.
• H: ProjecW5&09/EP/ RepoftTina11EAW Resp Pkge 10-16-06.doc
Page 7 ,1 , q 10/16/2006
LONE OAK BUSINESS CAMPUS
EAW RESPONSE PACKAGE
AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE
1)
MnDNR
2)
MPCA
3)
Mn/DOT
4)
METRO COUNCIL
5)
DAKOTA COUNTY
Page 8 10/16/2006
•
•
•
0
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Michael Ridley, City Planner
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road'
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, Minnesota 55106
651.772.7900
October 10, 2006
RE: Lone Oak Business Campus Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Dear Mr. Ridley:
The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the proposed Lone Oak
Business Campus in the City of Eagan. We offer the following comments for your consideration.
Description (Item No. 6)
The project boundary depicted in Figure 2, USGS Map, is incorrect. It leaves out the north 20
acres of the project, including most of that portion of Unnamed Basin #19-54P that falls within
• the project limits. The aerial photograph (Figure 3) appears to correctly show the project area.
Cover Types (Item No. 10)
The table shows the conversion of 8.4 acres of wooded/forest cover. This may result in the
removal of a significant amount of wood from the site. Depending on the condition of this wood,
the project proposer may elect to market it as sawlog, landscaping material, firewood, or bio -fuel
for the production of energy. We strongly recommend that the City contact Jean Mouelle,
Regional Forest Utilization and Marketing Specialist (651 772-7567), for advice on this subject.
The EAW requires a discussion of project compatibility with shoreland zoning district land use
restrictions. The northern three fourths of the site are located within a designated shoreland
zoning district. Provisions of the city's shoreland ordinance limit impervious surface coverage
and building height and require that 50% of the area within the shoreland district be maintained
in permanent open space.
Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff (Item No 17)
The water quality of the two DNR -regulated basins on the site is relatively good. These basins
- have rather -small -,low -development -drainage -areas. -While-the-EAW-speaksto-a-reduction-in—
the peak runoff rate for the 5 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year storm events, it does not identify and
address the anticipated increase in runoff volume resulting from the proposed land use
conversion. We expect that runoff volume from the site will be substantially greater if the
• development proceeds as proposed. Therefore, we recommend that the EAW quantify the
An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity
DNR Informa8on: 651-296-6157 1-888-646-66367 TTY: 651-296-5484 1-800-657-3929
Lone, Oak Business Campus
October 10, 2006
Page 2
impacts to the two major receiving waterbodies in terms of the water level bounce expected for
each for the 1, 2, 5, 10, and 100 -year events. The smaller, more frequent events (1 and 2 year)
tend to have greater long-term ecological impact on water resources than the larger but less
frequent events.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project and the EAW. We look forward to receiving
your record of decision and responses to comments at the conclusion of environmental review.
If you have any questions about these comments, please call Wayne Barstad, the Regional
Environmental Assessment Ecologist, at 651-772-7940.
Sincerely,
for
Joseph M. Kurcinka
Regional Director
C: Steve Colvin, Wayne Barstad, Sarah Wren, Diana Regenscheid, Pat Lynch
Dave Zappetillo Heather Tetrault, Bernice Cramblit (DNR)
Jon Larsen (EQB)
Nick Rowse (USFWS)
ERDB #20070117
EG06Lone0ak.doc
An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity
DNR Infounatlon: 651-296-6157 1-668.646.6367 TTY: 651-296-5484
1.800.657-3929
11
•
•
1 ..
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, MN 55155.4194 1 651-296-6300 1 800-657-3864 1 651-282-5332 TTY I www.Pca.state.mn.us
•
October 5, 2006
Mr. Michael Ridley
City of Eagan Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
RE: Lone Oak Business Campus
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Dear Mr. Ridley:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has received copies of the Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) prepared for the above project, prepared by the city of Eagan,
Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU). The MPCA has not reviewed the EAW for this project.
Therefore, the MPCA has no specific comments to provide the RGU. This decision not to
• review the EAW does not constitute waiver by the MPCA of any pending permits required by
the MPCA. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the project proposer to secure any required
permits and to comply with any requisite permit conditions. The enclosed checklist identifies
permits that the project may require, together with the most recent contacts at the MPCA.
We remind the RGU that, pursuant to Minn. R. 4410.1700, subp. 5 (Environmental Quality
Board Rules), a copy of the RGU's decision on this EAW needs to be sent to the MPCA..
�ssica Ebertz
' Project Manager
Environmental Review and Operations Section
Regional Division
JE:mbo U U
Enclosure I JI
- --- --- -- - — — A' U
---
cc: Jim Deanovic, Lone Oak Development, LLC D Q D
nc� i o zoos
St. Paul I Brainerd I Detroit Lakes I Duluth I Mankato I i arfha11 Rochester I Willmar Printed on 100% post -consumer recycled paper
CHECKLIST
After a cursory review of the proposed project, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff noted areas that may
need additional follow-up and/or a permit from the MPGA. Those specific areas are checked below:
SDS Permit — Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit
A State Disposal System (SDS) Permit is required for any extension of a sanitary sewer. If a sanitary sewer is
proposed as a part of this project, an application for the SDS Permit should be made to the MPCA by contacting
David Sahli, Municipal Division (MUN), Metro Region, at 651/296-8722.
❑ NPD$S/SDS Permit for dredged matetial disposal.
If disposal of dredged material is anticipated, then Brett Ballavance (Duluth office) at 218/7234837 or Jaramie
Logelin (Duluth office) at 218/529-6257 (northern), or Elise Doucette (MUN/Metro Region) at 651/296-7290 or
.Jeff Smith (Rochester office) at 507/285-7302 (southern) should be contacted.
NPDES Permit — Construction Stormwater:
A General National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit from the MPCA for construction
activities will be required for all projects that disturb one (1) or more acres of land The NPDES Permit
specifically requires Best Management Practices which are detailed in the permit (additional information can be
found in the MPCA document Protecting Water Quality in Urban Area) to prevent erosion and control
sedimentation during construction and a storrawater pollution prevention plan to manage pollutants in storm -
water runoff from the site that will occur atter construction is complete. As a requirement of the NPDES Permit,
storm -water wet -detention ponds must be installed to treat the storm -water runoff whenever a project replaces
surface vegetation with one or more cumulative acres of impervious surface. If you have need of technical
assistance. regarding this, please contact Michael Findorff (MUN/Metro Region) at 651/296-6798 or Todd Smith
(MUN) at 651/215-6008. For more general information, please contact the appropriate MPCA Regional Office
staff below:
❑ Brainerd, Lisa Woog at 218/855-5017
❑ Duluth, Jim Dexter at 218/529-6253
❑ Detroit Lakes, Joyce Cieluch at 218/846-7387
❑ Willmar/Marsball, Yudy Mader (St. Paul office) at 651/296-7315 or
Mark Hanson -(Marshall Office) at 507/537-6000
❑ Rochester, Roberta Getman at 507/280-2996
Metro, Brian Gove (REM/Metro Region) at 651/296-7597
❑ Industrial Stormwater
❑ Brainerd, Robin Novotny at 218/828.6114
❑ Duluth, John Thomas at 218/723-4928
❑ Detroit Lakes, Jack Frederick at 218/846-0734
❑ Marshall, Brad Gillingham at 507/537-6381
❑ Mankato, Teri Roth at 507/389-5235
El Rochester, Dennis Hayes at 507t280-2991
❑ Rochester, Jeff Smith at 507/285-7302
❑ Major Facilities, Elice Doucette (MUN/Mbtro Region) at 651/296-7290
❑ Willmar, Ben Koplin at 320/231-5321
❑ Septic Tank System
Individual septic tank systems design and construction must comply with Minn. R. 7080.
- — �— - or addinonaI—mfbrmation, coataciMark Wespetal N��tericcy an Coordination) at
651/296-9322.
6/21/05O
�A
' 1 OVER
1 %V
•
CJ
•
j� Water Quality Certification
l� Waiver of the Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification is required When wetlands are altered or
impacted by filling, drainage, excavation, or inundation as part of the federal Clean Water Act Section 404 permit
O process, a statement waiving the 401 Certification from our agency must be obtained.
If you have any questions regarding this, please contact Jennifer Olson, of the Regional Division, Business
Systems Unit 1, at 651/297-8611. The MPCA requires the project be evaluated for mitigation in accordance with
the following hierarchy of preference:
a. Avoid the impact.
b. Minimize the impact.
c. Mitigate the impact through wetland replacement.
❑ Demolition Debris
Demolition debris must be disposed of at a properly permitted disposal facility. For information on the location
of one nearest you, please contact the appropriate MPCA Regional Office staff below:
❑ Brain6rd, Glut Hoffman at 218/828-6198
0 Detroit Lakes, Roger Rolf at 218/846-0774
Duluth, Heidi Kroening at 218/723-4795 or Tim Musick at 218/723-4708
❑ Marshall, Brad Gillingham at 507/537-6381
❑ Rochester, Mark Hugeback at 507/280=5585
❑ Metro, Jackie Deneen (NW at 651/297-5847
❑ Asbestos
Asbestos maybe present in the buildings) that will be demolished, which requires special handling Please
contact Jackie Deneen (MW at 651/297-5847 for additional information.
A ❑ Wells
Abandonment and/or installation of wells must be done by a licensed well driller. Please contact the Minnesota
Department of Health 651/215-0823 for additional information.
❑ Above and Below Ground Tanks
The installation and/or removal of ALJ, above and below ground tanks must be reported to the MPCA before any
work begins. Please contact the MPCA Customer Assistance Center at 651/297-2274 or 800/646-6247 for
additional information
C1
❑ Potential Cumulative Effects
The section of the EAW designated for the analysis and discussion of potential cumulative effects is
incomplete. Please iefer to Citizens Advocating Responsible Development v. Kandiyohi Board of
Commissioners, 713 N.W.2d 817 (Minn 2006). The Court held that a "cumulative potential effects" inquiry
under Minn R. 4410.1700, subp. 7, requires a Responsible Governmental Unit to inquire whether a
proposed project, which may not individually have the potential to cause significant environmental effects,
could have a significant effect when considered along with other projects that (1) are already in existence,
are actually planned for, or for which a basis of expectation has been laid; (2) are located in the surrounding
area; and (3) might reasonably be expected to affect the same natural resources
❑ Other Issues Identified by Staff
6/21/05 2 OVER
I�
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan District
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B-2 •
Roseville MN 55113-3174
October 11, 2006
Mr. John Hohenstein
Director of Community Development
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
SUBJECT: Lone. Oak Business Campus EAW
Environmental Assessment Worksheet
Mn/DOT Review #EAW 06-027
One mile east of Trunk Highway (TH) 55 on the north side of Lone Oak Road
Eagan/Dakota County
Control Section 1909
Dear Mr. Hohenstein
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has reviewed the above -referenced
Planned Unit Development Environmental Assessment Worksheet that we received on Sept. 11,
2006. Please note that Mn/DOT's review of this EAW does not constitute approval of a regional
traffic analysis and is not a specific approval for access or new roadway improvements. As plans
are refined, we would like the opportunity to meet with the City and Dakota County to review the •
updated information. Mn/DOT's staff has reviewed the document and has the following
comments:
Traffic.,
The Mn/DOT Metro District Transportation System Plan (TSP) identified the need for
the addition of a third lane to TH 55 in the 2008 — 2014 time frame, but no funding has
been identified for a lane addition. There are many assumed roadway improvements
proposed for the Mn/DOT Trunk Highway system in this EAW. However, these
proposed improvements are not identified as funded by Mn/DOT during the more than
20 -year period included within the Mn/DOT 2008-2030 Transportation System Plan. For
questions on these points, please call Ken Johnson, Mn/DOT Metro District South Area
Engineer, at (651) 582-1379.
Traffic analysis section of EAW:
The traffic analysis section of the EAW does not address the impact of the proposed
development upon the Interstate 35E and Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26) interchange..
However. Lone Oak Road provides direct access from Interstate 35E to the propose(
business site. The proposed development appears likely to have an effect on the traffic
projected in the EAW for the TH 149 exit ramp onto east bound Interstate 494.
The EAW notes that a "realistic level of infrastructure improvements" should be built but,.-
does
ut
does not identifyan funding for an improvements- J `' �•
y g y �mp s �,� t� � 'J �s U
1 O QCT 12 2006
An equal opportunity employer ' ' "
Information is needed on what specific Mn/DOT Trunk Highway and other roadway
(City and County) infrastructure improvements may be needed. This can be developed
by estimating current and future traffic volumes that the development will likely add to
the existing transportation system.
Based on the 2017 Peak Hour traffic projections for the Interstate 494/TH 149
interchange, this interchange should be reconfigured. This potential improvement should
be added to the "list of infrastructure improvements" as part of the improvements
identified for the Interstate 494/TH 149 interchange. A funding source, other than
Mn/DOT, will need to be identified.
There are a number of on-going local traffic assessments being conducted in the vicinity
of the proposed development (see enclosure). A comparison should be included in the
traffic analysis section to assure that the traffic assessments identified in the traffic
analysis are consistent with the traffic characteristics being used for the on-going local
traffic assessments. For questions on these points, please call Jim Aswegan at Mn/DOT
Metro District Traffic Engineering at (651) 582-1618.
Permits:
• Any work impacting MnDOT right of way requires a permit. Permit forms are available
® from MnDOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us/tecsup/utility . Please direct any
questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig (651-582-1447) of MnDOT's
Metro Permits Section.
•
As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as
plats and site plans to:
Development Reviews
Mn/DOT - Metro Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B-2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2)
copies of other review documents including site plans.
Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will
make a submittal incomplete and delay MWDOT's 30 -day review and response process to
development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary
number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete
If you have any questions concerning this review please feel free to contact me at
(651)582-1462.
Im
Sincerely,
acyMary M? c
cNeff
Transportation Planner
0
Enclosure: List of on-going local traffic assessments, northeast Eagan, MN
Copy: Todd Tollefson, Dakota County Surveyor, Apple Valley, MN
Kristi Sebastian, Dakota County Traffic Engineer, Apple Valley, MN
Michael J. Ridley, City Planner, Eagan, MN
Gary Tushie, Tushie-Montgomery & Associates, Inc.
Julie Wischnack, SRP Consulting Group, Inc.
Bill Weber, MPRA, Inc.
•
1� �
October 11, 2006
• Interim list of on-going local traffic assessments impacting on Mn/DOT Trunk
Highways, northeast Eagan, MN:
1. Post Office, Lone Oak Road and Interstate 494
2. Dakota County -based assessments
3. Three -city Consortium (Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Rosemount ?)
To be updated later.
CJ
VA Metropolitan Council (� /
Building communities that work
October 11, 2006 •
Michael 1. Ridley, City Planner
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
RE: Eagan - Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW)
Lone Oak Business Campus
Metropolitan Council District 16
Metropolitan Council Review No. 19834-1
Dear Mr. Ridley:
The Lone Oak Business Campus project proposes the construction of 676,000 square feet of office
space, 32,000 square feet of warehouse, and 3,106 parking spaces on approximately 85 acres in the City
of Eagan. The Project is located on Lone Oak Road on the south and on the east by the City of Inver
Grove Heights.
Council staff has conducted a review of this EAW to determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing
regional concerns and the potential for significant environmental impact. An EIS is not necessary for
regional purposes. However, staff offers the following comments for your consideration:
Item 8 - Permits and Approvals Required •
In accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 473.513, at the time the City makes application to the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for a permit to construct each segment of the proposed
sanitary sewer project, a copy of the plans, design data, and a location map of the project will also need
to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council. The Council's Environmental Service Municipal Services
staff will need to review, comment, and recommend issuance of the construction permit by the MPCA
before connection can be made to the City's wastewater disposal system.
Item 17— Water Quality —Surface Water Runoff
On-site soils have been identified as being either sandy or silt loams, both of which are characterized as
either moderately well drained or well drained soils, and therefore favorable for incorporation of
infiltration techniques. The identification of plans to construct extensive surface parking areas
(exceeding 3,000 spaces) incorporating a number of parking lot islands would offer several sites where
bio -retention and low -impact development techniques could be incorporated. The Council recommends
the proposed project incorporate low -impact design development techniques in its final design to
beneficially retain runoff that reduce total off-site runoff. Those techniques could include incorporation
of:
• depressed rather than elevated planting areas to retain moisture and infiltrate smaller (more
— --'-
sediment -laden) ram alI events, an -
• a piped overflow/under-drain system to remove runoff from larger than average events to
maintain full use of the parking areas and minimize erosion of the planting areas. 2
The Metropolitan Council's Urban Small Sites BMP Manual includes detailed informat h Qtz Q
management practices. The manual is available at: IUnlil
htto•//wwwmetrocouncil.ore/environmentfWat�ersjhed/BMP/manual.htm. OCT 1 2 2006
w .metrocounca.org 14 W Metro Info Gne 602-1888
230 East Fifth Street • St. Paul. Minnesota 55101-1626 • (651) 602-1000 • Fax 602-1550 • TIY 281-0904
M Equal OppartungyErnplayer
•
Michael I Ridley
October 11, 2006
Page 2
If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Patrick Boylan, Principal
Reviewer, at 651-602-1438.
Sincerely,
Phyl ' Hanson, Manager
Office of Planning &Technical Assistance
cc: Jack Jackson, Multifamily Market Analyst, MHFA
Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT - Metro Division
Brian McDaniel, Metropolitan Council District 16
Patrick Boylan, Principal Reviewer
Cheryl Olsen, Reviews Coordinator
V:\REVIEWS\Communidm\Eagan\Letters\Eagen 2006 EAW LogeAak Bus. Campus-19834-1.dw
Office of Planning
Lynn G. MoraudmAICP
Planning Manager
Dakota County
Western Service Center
14955 Galaxie Avenue
Apple Valley, MN 55124
952.891.7030
Fax 952.891.7031
wwwco.dakommn.us
f5
.an mx wusaw..a�w.�.
I
October 12, 2006
Michael Ridley
City Planner
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
RE: Dakota County Comments on the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the
Lone Oak Business Campus
Dear Mr. Ridley:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the environmental assessment
worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Lone Oak Business Campus.
The environmental assessment worksheet has been reviewed by staff in the Physical
Development Division. Our comments are included with this letter. In addition, we have
also attached a series of maps and tables that further explain our comments.
We look forward to working with you as this project moves forward. If you have any
questions, please call me at (952) 891-7033.
Sincerely,
Lyn ' oratzka, Manager
Office of Planning
End
cc: Thomas Egan, Dakota County Commissioner — District 3
Brandt Richardson, County Administrator
Greg Konat, Director, Physical Development
(TW l
11
r1
L_J
Dakota County Comments: Lone Oak Business Campus
• The proposal calls for construction of 676,000 square feet of office space on approximately 85
acres bounded on the south by Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26) and on the east by the City of Inver
Grove. The project includes four parcels, PIN# 100010001575, PIN# 100010001175,
100010001475, and 100010001375.
Section 7: Figure 4 — Site Plan
The EAW states the development will have one full access with three right in/right out private
driveways, of which two will be temporary. Access spacing needs io comply with the County's
access spacing guidelines and will be subject to further review when the development plat is
submitted for Plat Commission review.
No driveway access should be permitted to Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26). Since the westerly and
easterly accesses essentially only serve one building, there is a question of whether they meet
County access standards.
In addition, the layout does not adequately show accesses and development on the south side of
CSAH 26: The main access location needs to align with the approved access on the south side
of CSAH 26.
Section 21 - Traffic
• Transportation staff is interested in the impacts of the proposed site to the surrounding County
highway system. With 6,086 aftemoon peak hour vehicle trips being generated from this
development at full build out a traffic impact study needs to identify the transportation impacts,
deficiencies, and the needs related to the proposed development The study needs to provide
the basis for the developer and the governmental agencies (City, County, Stats).to fully
understand traffic operations as the site develops and as surrounding traffic continues to grow
and to identity the necessary improvements to allow the development and overall highway traffic
to operate in a safe and efficient manner.
The document provides a summary of a traffic study that was prepared but not included with the
distributed Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW). The traffic impact study should follow
practices recommended by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' publication "Transportation
Impact Analyses for Site Development" for analysis. The analysis needs to identify when there
are levetof service issues and roadway network deficiencies occurring on available roadways
due to the development and area traffic volume increases. The study needs to identify needed
roadway improvements. This analysis should identify deficiencies and needs for existing
operations, at development opening, and through 2025. Instead, the current traffic study
analyzes Impacts and improvements needed for the years 2007 and 2017, basing it on the years
when development of the site occurs and roadway improvement assumptions, which does not
identify when the deficiencies are initially occurring. -
The study summary assumes that certain improvements will be made to area roadways. The
Capital Improvement Program. The study should also investigate if Mn/DOT has these assumed
improvements programmed in their project program before assuming the improvements to be in-
place. The traffic analysis needs to analyze impacts without these improvements that are not
• programmed and identify what improvements will be needed.
��u
Dakota County Comments: Lone Oak Business Campus
Sections 12,13, 18, 20 —_Environmental
Waste Sites and Spills
County Environmental Management Staff did not identify any waste sites either on or directly
adjacent to the subject property. Ninety-eight waste sites were identified within approximately
one mile of the subject property. A waste site is an area where solid or hazardous wastes are
disposed, where hazardous materials are spilled or leaked, or where contaminants are leached or
otherwise released into the environment Waste sites range from well known to unknown, recent
to very old, surfiaal to buried, small to large, inert to reactive, and relatively safe to hazardous.
Environmental contamination affects -the air, land, surface water, and groundwater and may
seriously impact plants, animals, and humans. In short, a site is any waste disposal or
contaminant release potentially impacting the environment and threatening public health and
safety.
Eight MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) VIC (Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup
Program) sites were identified within approximately one mile of the subject property.
One MPCA (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) Dump and one permitted solid waste site were
Identified within approximately one mile of the subject property.
Twenty-one MPCA LUST (Leaking Underground Storage Tank) sites were identified within
approximately one mile of the subject property.
Sixty-five MPCA Spill sites were Identified within approximately one mile of the subject property.
The City of Fagan and Lone Oak Development, LLC, should be aware that if development occurs
on, adjacent to, or near a potentially impacted site, soil and groundwater impacts may be
encountered that are not known or identified due to down -gradient migration of groundwater and
surface water. Due to the potential to encounter Impacts from adjacent sites, a radius of
approximately one mile has been used as the standard search radius for this environmental
review. It is also possible that sites will be encountered that have not been identified and are not
known sites. Should impacted soil or water be encountered during this project, a site
investigation and remediation may be required, in accordance with MPCA Guidelines and Dakota
County Ordinances.
Hazardous Waste Generators and Tanks
Fifty-seven hazardous waste generators, with 331 active waste streams permitted, were identified
within approximately one mile of the subject property.
One hundred forty-four MPGA Registered Tanks were Identified within approximately one mile of
the subject property.
Wells
Two registered wells (ID# 174664 and T02320) were identified either on or adjacent to the subject
property. One well is identified as being sealed. Two hundred seventy-three registered wells .
WeMdErtifiettwil"n approximately one mi . eferlaturaltached-table—
for a listing of the identified wells. Well locations are presented on the attached Environmental
Review figure.
•
Since 1974, all water wells constructed in Minnesota have been required to meet the locational •
and constructional requirements of the Minnesota Well Code. Wells are used for domestic and
Dakota County Comments: Lone Oak Business Campus
municipal drinking water supply, water quality monitoring, and irrigation. As wells age, they may
• deteriorate and lose their ability to keep surface contaminants and contaminated groundwater
from impacting deeper aquifers. Because of these concerns, Dakota County requires that at the
time of property transfer, unused wells either be sealed or registered annually. State law requires
that a seller who fails to properly disclose a well, may be liable for well sealing costs for up to six
years after the date of the sale.
Transmission Lines and Pipelines
Existing electric transmission lines and pipelines were Identified within one mile of the subject
property. Contact the pipeline owners for accurate locations and specifications.
Wetlands
Wetlands were identified on the subject property. Caution should be taken to avoid adverse
affects to wetland areas during development Wetlands or ponds identified on the subject
property also extend to adjacent properties and should not be adversely affected by development
or future use. The property has an elevation relief of greater than 50 feet from highland to pond
area. Due to the property elevation, significant erosion issues could occur during development
Adverse affects to the wetland and pond areas should be prevented. Refer to the attached
Natural Resources Review figure for locations of the wetland areas and identified environmentally
sensitive areas.. Wetlands are classified based on the National Wetland Inventory
Please refer to the attached tables for more information regarding the above -referenced sites and
to the attached Environmental Assessment Figure for locations of the above -referenced sites.
Should additional information be needed regarding sites referenced in this report, please contact
• the Dakota County Environmental Management Department at (952) 891-7557.
Disclaimer. The information in this environmental review is made available as a public service.
This information is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County makes no
representation or warranties, expressed or implied, with reaped to the data provided herein,
regardless of its format or means of transmission. There is no guarantee or representation to the
user as to the accuracy, currency, suitability or reliability of this data for any purpose. The user
accepts the data as W and assumes all dsks.associated with its use. If any discrepancies,
Inaccuracies, or inconsistencies are found, please contact the Dakota County Environmental
Management Department immediately at 952-891-7557.
•
0
i
Envirown-wow •
Lona Oak Business Park, Eagan - EqW
October 9, 2000
ns wane uemrem.
TYPE
312E
I WASTE
GENERATOR GENERATOR
SITE ADDRESS
CII
Me
SOG
Tlpmw
10 TMI Coati Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Ea
Manulact
SOG
us
1 TMI CwU Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
n
mmugw
BOG
Pal Reeks
1 TMI CwU Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Man"
BOG
ON and Water
10 TMI CwU Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
n
mamiep
BOG
Le P
Active
10 TMI Coati Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
BOG
RUF
[Azw
10 TMI Coatings,Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
FA an
Memdea
SQG
Se blaelA Media
-
10 TMI Cwt Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
n
Man lacl _
BOB
a] MM
1 TMI Coatings, Irc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
SOG
Weenw Solvent
10 TO Cwll Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Enown
alenWad
BOG
V
10 TMA Coati Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eamer,
Manufacturing;
SQG
w Clever
10 TMI Coatings, Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
M
Soo
rase
10 TMA Coatings. Ins
2805 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Mantilacturkig
SQG
Fla ble Liquid
Active
80 Ealab Chem End Ceder
310 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
Mended
SOG
caustic Liquid
Active
80 Ecolab Chem Era Cedes
940 Lone Oak Rd
Mem"durky
Soo
LouPeds
MNe
80 Ecolab Chain End Carder
940 Lane 0ak Rd
Eagan
Martufacturing
MG
Fl mswntAMe Lumps
MNe
80 Ecolab Chem Eng Caner
940 Lan Oak Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
SOG
DrA Cell Ballwbs
AcW.
50 Ecolab Chem Em Caner
040 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
MwKftdurkM
BOG
Commistime Liquid
Active
80 E.M Chem Era Caper
940 Lam Oak Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
BOG
Usel 01
AcWe
'50 Ecolab ChwEng - Gamer
940 Lam 0ak Rd
Eagan
Manuladwing
BOG
Piffift, Washer Sohrent
MNe
SC Ecolab Cham End Denier
940 Lone Oak Rd
Ea
n
Manufacturing
SOG
la
ACINe
50 Eodab Over, End Caner
940 Lone Oak Rd
Em
en
Manufacturing
SOG
Co oskm Liquid
Active
801 Ewbb Chem Eng Center
940 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
menufacturkm
SOG
Qx1dwna Liquid
AdNa
50 Ewbb Chem E Or
940 Lone Oak Rd
Even
ManWecl
BOG
L AcMWedea
AkIbm
aolEcakab Chem Eno Cede
940 Lam 0ak Rd
Eagan
menuladurby
BOG
tmaw
Active
50 Ew1ab Chem End Ceder
940 Lom Oak Rd
Eagan
Mended
SOG
te maroun,
Act"
50 Ecolab Chain rns Cela
040 Lone Oak Rd
Eagan
Manufacturing
BOG
W to famdc sold
MNe
50 Ecolab Chem Ena Center
940 Lam Oak Rd _
Eagan
Vehicle Matraemnee
VSOG
wasMr Solved
Active
Hooveslp
2950 Lone Oak Cade
Eagan
. Vehicle MaFbnanco
VSOG
C Cleenaf
ACWe
Hoowetd
2950 Law Oak CMe
Eagan
VeHde Mandewnce
VSOG
L Add Belledee-
L
Active
891-lomw lol
2050 Lom Oak Ckcts
en
Vehicle MaMenence,
VSQG
KE OD
Active
39 Hooveslol
2850 Lam Oak Ctrde
. Eagan
Vehick, McMaram a
VSQG
OI FSnrs
Active
89 H000eetd.
2950 Lone Oak Cbtla
Empon
Vehicle Mormnamw
VSOG
FidwKSOMAINI.rcum Lmve
A e
8WHomnessol
2950 Lone Oak Circle
Eagan
VaMrde Me",ria ce
VSOG
Aniffnez.
Ac1Ne
89Hommou!
2950 Lone Oak Circle
Eanan
Manufacturing
VSQG
Usltd 01
Active
I 161 Bod&Ar and Som Irc. R.L.
3330 Mike Cads, Or
Eagan
Manulacturing
VSQG
Pohs Wash Salved
AdWe
I i5l Bweker and S. Ino R.L.
3330 Mike Collins, Or
Eagan
mamincturing
VSOG
Fl - wrd?ALamps
MNe
115 Bodeker and Som Ino., R.L.
3330 Mks Colles Or
Eagan
_
hims'lacturby
VSQG
OI Filen
MNe
11 518odlw wd Som Inc. R.L.
3330 Mike Cooks Or
FA
Mimulachoing
VSOG
Lead Acid 6ella11ee
MNe
I 1518coakerend Som Inc.,R.L.
3330 Mike Colica Or
Eagan
Vehicle Makeewnce
BOG
Parts WeNrer Solved
Active
1201 Nath StarDlaael Service LLC
3110 Mike Collis Or
Eagan
Vehicle MaiNemwe
BOG
Leltd Add Batteries
Imdlue
120 Nodh Star Dbael Service, LLC
3110 Mke Colts Dr
Eagan
VehMa Mowemnce
SOG
U&W Do
MNe
120 Nam Star Diesel Service LLC
3110 Mike Collins, Or
Eagan
VeHde Maintenance,
SOG
OilPilesMNe
120 Nath Star Oleeel SeMw LLC
3110 Mike COMMCas Or
Eagan
VeNds Maki erce
m
BOG
s
hee
MNe
120 Nath Star Dime Servke LLC
3110 Mike Colics Dr
Ewan
Mwrc
Vehide Make
SQG
Lelad Acid Batteries
Active
1201 North91ar Ousel Service LLC
3110 Mke Colics Or
Emean
Vow. MaFlamnw
SOG
Iminersior, ChuM
Active
1201 Nath Star Diesel SerAw LLC
3110 Man Cohn, Or
Eagan
Vehicle Mawemnw
SOO
Fbiwavownd/Mercury La s
Active
120 North Star Diesel SeMw LLC
3110 Mike Collins Or
Eagan
Mar"Vadurky
VSOG
NkW Platint Waste
Active
149 Bo.De Metal FkftNm
3350 Mike Co9bn Or
Eagan
Manub,durby
VSQG
C Falling Waste
Mlle
149BDul MeudFkfthIg
3350 Mike Cooks Or
Eagan
Mwdad
VSOG
Add Anew Liquid
Active
149 Bo -Decor Metal Firilshing
3350 Mike Colhs Dr
Eagan
ManWap
VSQG
On
Imdhe
149 Bo-Dewr Metal Finishing
3350 Mks Cods Or
Eagan
Manufacturing
VSOG
Oil Fillers
Imdhe
141111B.-DewrMetaFmIshana
3350 Mks Cooks Or
C -e an
mamindurIng
SOG
nnerAPalyd
Mhe
208 Brown Mpis Tank
2875 Hwy 55
an
Marlufacusira
Manuled
SQG
SOO
M wasMr Sasronl
Ldad Acid Batteries
MNe
MNe .
208 down Mpl, Tank
209 down Mob Tedi
2875 Hm,
2875 Kw 55
Empan
Fa en
M.nulacturing
SQG
UiWd Oil
Active
205 Broom M b Tank
2875 55
Ea
n
Manuladving
BOG
IN RemilurhOSIFIN.
AcUm
208 Brown Mph Tank
2875 HM
Eacern
Manufeput
SOO
FUm
Active
208 Brown M Ie Tank
2875 55
en
Mamt
a—,
F rSolulbn
MNe
203 Brovin Mph Tank
2875 KVY 55
en
Mwdad
SQG
1poffil
Active
20a dorm M b Tank
2575 65
n
E
Environmental Review
Lone Oak Business Park, Eagan - Fl}W
October ll, 2006
`tuis
TYPE '�
SIZE
WASTE.
STATUS GENERATOR i GENERATOR
SITEADDRESS
city
Maradaa
SOG
Fl resarNM Le
We
Brener Mists Tank
2975 65
Eagan
Maradecl
SOG
01 Form
Active
206 BmwnM Toni,
2875 55
an
Menuladal
SOG
St I MBI Sale
AcWe
208 &own M Tank
2875 - 55
Eagan
Printing
VSQG
Mk usr W.ls
Active
215 Cuslem Deek
951 Rd
Ee
Prhl
VSQG
Fl a Le
Ache
215 Custom Dark
957 Ib Rd
n
PmW
VSQG
Active
215 Cuslon Desk
951 Ib Rd
Eagn
Rhtl
VSOG
Pel Booth Fllan
Active
275 Cuslon Doak
951 b Rd
Ea en
Eqdpnwd Repair
VSOG
Wes sown
Active
234 LeNodh Nrerics
855 Rd
W menet Repair
VSOG
Lead Ae10 Bdleri.
Active
239 V Nath Pmerlee
655 Ib Rd
E.n
W N Repair
VSQG
U 00
Active
234 Lahrup North Amerbe
855 Apollo Rd
Eagan
Egotown Repair
VSOG
08 FIRM
Acute
23,111.91ansellorthArreslat
855 Apollo Rd
Eagan
EqdpmfflRe
VSOG
FiLbrescartivivarany Lamps
Active
234 Wo Nath Anatla
81% Apollo Rd
Eagan
Scitipinedi Repair
Olt restern dire
Inactive
2391-e North Americas
855 ApolloRd
Eagan
Ecittip,nailt Repair
VSQG
oiijsor m
Active
234 Le Nwlh Mwiaa
656 Apollo Rd
an
Auto Body
VSQG
Paw Thinner
Active
240 Nada Body Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Auto sody
VSOG
Pa Mer,
Active
240 Arcade Gody Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Eonan
Auto Body
VSOG
I.e6d Add Issued.
IrmdNe
740 Arade Bdy Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Eagann
Auto Body
VSQG
Flrasa
Act"
240 Nada Body Shop
2815 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Auto Body
VSOG
Pand Strioner
Acute
240 Amis Both, Mart,
2815 Dodd Rd
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Part, Washer Schad
Active
3061ndudrlal Service Inc.
2950 Lone Oak Ckde
Ee-
Vehide Maintenance
VSQG
Laid Add BaOeees
Active
308 Indalrlal Service Inc.
29M Lane Oak Ckde
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
Usid 01
Active
30141ndusift Service 1..
2950 Lore Oak Ckcle
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Anfreeze
Active
308 Industrial Service Inn
2950 Lore Oak Cede
an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
OII Fken
Active
3081 Industrial Service Inc.
2850 Loa Oak Cecb
Ea n
Vehicle Makaelrence
VSQG
PatheWspharSpiverd
Active
3731 North S1atFMt Smiom Ire,
3321 Mike COWm Or
Ea
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Laid Add Saserift,
Acute
373INorthburicisesSenwasinc.
3321 Mike Collins Or
Eagan
Venda Makdenanee
VSQG
Usbd 08
Active
373NoM Star Flad Services Im.
3321 Mike Cogho Or
an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
nese
Active
373NoM Star Flad Services Inc.
3327 Mks Collie Or
an
Vehicle MaIrs ance
VSOG
Fl r.ardlM La
Active
3731 North Star Fleet ServicesInc.
3321 Mike Collins Dr
Ea an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Can, Cleaner
Inactive
373 Ncnh Star FMreI Senrices, Inc.
3321 Mika CoBkte Or
n
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Ol Filen
Active
373 Nodh Star Fbat Servka,,1m.
3321 Mae Cocke Or
Ea n
Vehicle Mebaerance
SOO
Washer SONent
Acute
378 Wane Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Vehicle Meide ance
SOG
L Add Betted.
Acute
378 Wd mofl Inc
2805 Dodd Rd
Ea
Vehide Maintenance
SOG
OB
Active
378 Wel Ire
2805 Dodd Rd
Vehicle Maintenance
SOG
OI FRera
Active
37 Wate moo Inc -
2805 Dodd Rd
^
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
Washer SoNerd
Active
493 gal Lena Inc
850 Loa Oak Rd
n
Vehkb Makde stance
VSQG
Head 01,
Active
4 Sal Lane Inc
850 Lone Oak Rd
Ea n
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
01F61en
Inactive
493 5d Lane Inc
860 Lane Oak Rd
Ee n
Venda Maintenance
VSOG
Fl nape La
Active
4 Lame Inc
850 Lone Oak Rd
Vehicle Makderance•
VSQG
Cleaner
[resolve
493 SsN Lana Inc
860 Lona Oak Rd
n
E madR
VSQG
Washer
tractive
Foster Minnesota Inc. John
3703Mke Colica Dr
W mentR
VSQG
rouc Dl Tank a
tractive
500 Falx Minreeole Inc. Jim He
3103 Mike Colla Or
en
E tdsant Repair
VSQG
Rel / Solved
Active
500 FasterMlna.ola Inc. John
3103 Mike Cake Or
Eagan
W Repair
VSQG
d Rlien
Acute
500 Faster Minnesota Inc. John Henry3703
Mike Collins Or
an
W Repairnt '
VSQG
08
Acute -
500 Fater Mlnneaata lrn John Herwy
3103 MUM CWka Or
Eagan
E W d Repair
VSOG
OI Filen
Active
500 Foster Minnesota Inc. John Henry3103
Mon Cullbe Or
n
E W menlR r
VSOG
Fl reecenVM Lam
Active
500 Foster Minn vela Inc. John He
3103 Mike Colon Or
n
Ecnifinner,11 Repodr
VSQG
edusis
Active
500 Foster Mirvresoa Inc. John Malay
3103 Mks Octave Or
Ea n
W mad Re
VSOG
ria Cbaar
Active
500 FosterMtmaeota Inc. Jahn Harpy
3103 Mks Coam Or
Eagan
W mat Repair
VSOG
WsaM- ueaa
Active
SW Foster Minnesota Inc. John Henry3103
Mks Collins Or
Eurian
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Ixtem,
Active
581 Do= Corporation
3308 Mike Cake Or
Entire,
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
PArts Washer Sphere
Active 1
581 Done Corporation
3306 Mae Cogan Or
Ea n
Vehicle Mekdenarce
VSQG
U 08
Active
581 Corporation
3308 Mike Colica Or
Ea n
Vehirs
de Mewence
VSQG
O F F.
Active
581 us Ion
3308 Mike Cahn Or
E n
VehMe Maintenance
VSOG
L Acct Belted.
Active
Sal O us nikm
3308 Mks Collin Or
Eve an
Vehicle Menbnance
VSQG
R mn Lem -
Active
581 O us nibs
33M Mae Coehn Or
Fs
VeNde Malyderana
VSOG
b based adMsN.
Active
581 Co Ion
3306 Mike Collins Dr
Eve n
MOG
Was rSolvent
AcWe
539 Roved E W mad
3275 Dodd Rd
Ea n
Md.Maintenance
VeNde McManance
MW
L d Add Belleri.
AcMa
Road W mad
3275 Dodd Rd
Vehlde Mehte
MQG
Died 08
Active
639 Road E W .ra
3275 Dodd Rd
E en
is
i
Environment eW
Lone Oak Business Park, Eagan - EIW
October 0, 2006
0
nK Waele WnelOrVm
TYPE
SIZE
WASTE
STATUS GENERATORN GENERATOR
SITE ADDRESS
city
VeNde MaWentnce
MOG
OII Fliers
Active
639 Road EqtgpmM
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde MaNarmme,
MOG
FI wralMa Lam
AdNe
633 Road E id M
3275 Dodd Rd
Boom
VeNde Manderance
MOG
Ad Ne
ON Raad W M
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Mondad
VSOG
Po Washer Solvent
Active
692 Swlh Pad
6555 E Lane Oak Rd
Eneen
ManWad
VSOG
00
tractive
69 SaWh Park Cort,
655 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagan
Mamded
VS3G
al Fllam
ImrdNa
69 Sotah Ped Co
655 E Lone Oak Rd
Espall
Memfaa
VSOG
Fl oanVM L.P.Active
68 SOVIh Pad Ca
655 E Lone Oak Rd
FAan
Marnfecl
VSOG
L Add"Utdes
Iradtve
682 SOWN Ped Co
855 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagan
Mamdsd
VSOG
Cel Ripens,
Iradws
682 Soe1h Pad
60 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagant
Mended
VSOG
OI Baso PaW
Iradiva
'BB SONh Pad
655 E Lane Oak Rd
Eagan
MenWacl
VSOG
btesalds
Inactive
00 South Pak Co
655 E Lane Oak Rd
FAMn
mwukd
VSOG
Nes
Irmctiva
Sculh Ped
655 E Lona Oak Rd
Eagan
Maniacs
VSOG
la Packs -
AcOre
SOWN Pad
655 E Lane Oak Rd
EaM
VeNde MaWerancs
VSOG
08
Adfle
734HMmr
NO Rd
Eagan
Veldde Maintenance
VSOG
R
A.W.
734HWU
888 Rd
Vehkde MaWanance
VSOG
OI Falem
Active
734 H4sn
BBD lla Rd
an
Whkle Matti.
VSOG
Washer Solvent
Adba
734 HWM
890 IS Rd
an
Manusd
VBQG
aslmr Solvent
Ac"
7 &hon Memdad
- 3115 Mar. Caabm Or -
Ea en
Manulad
VSOG
Part Thinner
Act"
782 8 ken Mamdool
3115 Mike Collins Dr
Eagan
Mamfaa
VSOG
FllbmrsnllM
A< e
7 &boon Memfed
3115Mhe Colhm Dr
Eagan
BLAkI McWenance
MOG
SdWon
Active
7 Nanheest Area,-
.A
2700 Lone Oak
Eagan
BurkinaMaWmarca
MOG
Pl oanVMe Lam
ACWe
785Nodhwest Adores-Btl.A
2700 La. Oak PkwY
Evans,
S4I41 MaNerame,
MOG
COr.W.Wn
Ad
7850fonh al Adbme-Btl,A
2700 Lone Oak
an
BW McNaranee
VSOG
Point Thinner
ACUM
7 Norlh, dAnka,-Btl.N
2800 Lore Oak PI
Eagan
SWtl Matrdenanca
VSOG
ra Filers
Active
788NWhwest Adkm-Stl.N
2800 Lorin Oak PI
an
Sul Melmenarce
VSOG
A Sosem
Active
7 NOdhxeel A li ms -
. N
2800 Lona Oak R
an
SuppingMaNaanca
VSOG
SoNlsa
Inactive
7 Nodhmol Adam-
.N
2800 Lone Oak Pt
Eagan
BW Makderame
VSOG
mulo0a
Act&a
7 NodhomA Adkins-Btl.N
2000 Lora Oak Pt
Eaon
Bm Malm name
VSOG
Fl
Ade
736 Notlhwetl Adkm - Bldg.
N
2600 Lane Oak R
an
BW McWermnce
VSOG
Wade
lrmdive
7 Notthwest AMkae -Bld.N
2600 Lane Oak PI
BwWl Maintenance
VS03
hCHomforn
Inedi"
7 Nodhwet Adlrms-
.N
2800 Lana Oak PI
Es an
adding MaWererce
VSOG
Oa Filers
ACWe
7 NarQmasl Adhms-BId.N
25W Lone Oak Pt
an
BWI41 Wbtlinrenea
VSOG
01 Absorbent,
ALUM
7!4N2!2.1 Anhm-Btl,N
25W Lone Oak PE
Eagan
BW Mato ne"W"
VSOG
lefts Lead Add.
Ac"
788Norow dAdkms-Side.N
2500 Lane Oak Pt -
E en
Burke Mandermrce
VSOG
en Generelar
IractNe
7 NOnhrnnt Abltms - Bldg.
N
29W Lone Oak PI
Sdtli Mawarance
VSOG
ter Trea rent Ch ndcid
Iradlre
78 Nonheasl Adkm - B
. N
2000 Lone Oak PI
'
Ea
BWidl MaWerance
VSOG
L d Add Gaped.
Inactive
7 NorUNreal Adhere -B
. N
2800 Lone Oak Pi
Eagan
BuSft MaWerance
VSOG
Palm Washer Sowers
Acute
7 Nonlnveal Arsm,•
.N
2600 Lone Oak Pt
BulW MakMranro
VSOG
mwk
AcINe
786 Nonhweal Adkins - Bldg.
N
2000 Laren Oak Pt
Eaan
BWBI Mabderarce
VSOG
uta Batteries
Active
788 Nmh mt Adtras - Bldg.
N '
2600 Lane Oak R
Eagan
&itl McWe
VSOG
N Batteries
AcUve
7 Nodhwast Adhm-Bldg.
N
28W Lora Oak PI
BWMI Mabdenenee
VSOG
COO Batteries,
Acute
7 Nodhaeel PMNas -
. N
2800 Lone Oak R
BWBI MaWermnee
VSOG
B's
Active
7 NodhWasl Adhmf -Bldg.N
2600 Lone Oak Pt
an
VeNde Makdomme
VSOG
U 00
Ad
954 Td Adler, T
3275 Dodd Rd
Slow
VeNde Maintenance
VSOG
Pdft Washer Sol rd
AdIve
954 Tn Actim Tnxkkv
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Vahkip McNanerce
VS3G
Wed Add Batteries
AcINe
854 Td Action T
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde MaWenerma
VSOG
00 Fee.
AcINe
954 Td Adorn T
3275 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Valdde Makderawe
VSOG
U OI
Active
11321N. Sar R -Ado Citonanaling
2809 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde Maintenance,
VS2G
100 Fit.
AcINe
11321N. Ser R -Aulo Dismanallne
2800 Dodd Rd
Eagan
VeNde Mameranoa
VSOG
JLjad Add Batteries
AcINa
1132 N. Su Rac,,cfiry • Arlo Disinardeffro
2809Dodd Rd.
Eagan
VeNde Manderarce
VSOG
IMpIrme
Active
11321N. Ser Fectclkv - Auto Dianantefing
2009 Dodd Rd
Eagen
Vatwe Mabaaranee
VSOG
swlldms
Acute
1132 N. Star R d - Auto Dbirnarlettrig
2808 Dodd Rd
EaW
Vahkla Meirdemnoa
VSOG
On
Acute
It3glGromteMankyelm
-
. 3187 Red Oak Or
Eagan
VeNde McWerswe
VSOG
O Fater
Acute
1139 GrsB,e Monk'- Ine
3191Red Oak Or
Eagan
VeNde McNerence
VSOG
PAIII, Washer SONent
Active
1156 Pm Siop Truck Service
2815 Hvvy 55
Ea an
Vehlda Maiidermnce
VSOG
FI m,cwdnpe Lprnpe
P iv.
1158 Pro Stpp Truck Servbe
2815 55
Eagan
VaNcle Manenanee
VSOG
Ukd OIMN0
1168 Pro Ser Tmck Service
2815 55
Eagan
Vehkh Makeerence
V
F11m
Active
11 Pro Tnck Sovke
2816 65
Eapen
Vehida McWenenro
VSOG
,101 Snberds
AcWa
11 Pros Trwk Service
2816 65
Eagan
VeMde Mebaerarroa
VS3G
U 00
IftIVI.
1248 V.IwAWcR-palr
6689 S Robert Tr
Inver Gruva Hal hs
Environmental Review
Lone Oak Business Park, Eagan - 7October 9, 2006
W'TYPE ••••
SIZE
WASTE
GENERATORe GENERATOR
STE ADDRESS
city
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
OI Flt.
1246 Vous Aub Repair
8889 S Robed Tr
Inver Grove Heights
Vehicle Malraarence
VSQG
Le Acid Belled.
1246 Value Ado Ir
6889 S Robed Tr
Inver Grove Heights
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Washer Schram
1246 Value Auto r
B889 S Robert Tr
Inver Grove hle
Vehicle Memonarm
VSOG
Washer
1283 Minnesota Coaches;
2815 56 Bulb B
Eaw
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
Acid Batteries
FAC�.
1 Minnesota Coach=
28758 55 sidleB
an
Vehicle Mebee.nce
VSOG
Fl
1293 Mbuesola Candles
2815 H 55 su8e 8
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
o0
1293 Minnesota Coodwe
2615 H 65 state B
Eagan
Vehicle MaMemnce
- VSQG
O Fibers
Active
1283 Mknesata Coedes
2815 65 suite B
Eagan
Mwaded
VSQG
Fl nonwdM
13305 le ler. Inc.
809 tla Rd
E
Mrs ubd
VSOG
U 01
1330 S _ la. Inc.
BOB Apollo Rd
Eagan
Maredecturing
VSOG
01 Barbells
Active
1330 Sinji,42ty Systeans Inc.
BOB Apollo Rd
Ea an
Monlifacitiang
VSQG
ILelidAcIdUatterhas
Active
1330 Sihems Inc.
909 Apollo Rd
n
Manufacturing
VSOG
111drannable, Solvents
Active
1330 Sing System Inc.
009 ApolloRd
Eagan
Mouxlessurby
VSOG
1pduwasher
Active
1330 Single.Ply System Inc.
ON ApolloR4
Eagan
Maedact
VSOG
[CrAorketted Solvents
Active
1330 SIMIN44y System 1.
909 Apollo Rd
Eagan
Marcilacturing
VSOG
IGA3 Absokads
Acute
1330 S s hems Inc.
909 Apollo Rd
Eagan
Moruffacturing
VSOG
1011 Filers
Active
1330 S lane Inc.
908 Apolo Rd
an
VeNW Maintenance
VSOG
IftneWasherSolvent
Acute
1354 Stock Lumber Ire.
915 Yankee Doodle Road
Eaen'
Vehicle MaMerance
VSOG
AdUfteeze
Active
1354 Sock Lumber Inc.
916 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan
VeMde Maintenance
VSQG
Active
1351 Sack Lumber Inc
915 Yankee Doodle Rated
Eagan
VeMde Maintenance
VSQG
ON
Active
1354 Sad Lumber. Inc
815 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan
Vehicle MaWenenw
VSQG
Active
13645tod Lumber ire.
915Yankee Doodle Reed
an
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
atteries
Active
1354 Block Lumber Ina
915 Yankee Doodle Road
Eagan
Vehicle Makde.nce
MUG
rSolV di
Inactive
1364 Vel MdorS da •
2815 Dodd Road Sim 102
Ea en
Vehicle Mamenance
MQG
VL4adAcIdBaUedw
MNe
1364 Vd Mdor
2615 Dodd Road Sae 102
Eagan
VeMde Mabderrnce
MQG
Active
1364 V MoW
2815 Dodd Road SAW 102
an
VeMde Mainlensrwa
MOO
Wesher Sud a
MNe
384 Vel Motor s
2816 Dodd Road Suite102
Eager,
VeMde McMemree
VSQGer
Solvent
Active
1375 Penske Tried, La. Co. LP.
965 Aldrin Or
Ea n
Vehicle Mainlerance
VSOG
alled.
Active
1375 Pens a Tt Lw Co. LP.
965 Aldan Dr
n
Vehicle Mdmerance
VSOG
-
Active
1375 Penske Truck Lowest Co. LP.
806 Aldan Dr
Eagan
Vehicle MaWenree
VSOG
ON Ruse
Active
13751 Penske Truck Leasing Co. LP.
965 Aldan Or
Eagan
Vehicle Mektaaance
VSOG
thead OI
Active
1376Pe.he TNckt. Co. LP.
985 Aldan Or
Eaan
Vehicle MaHensnce
VS3GFl
reecent
Active
1375 Penske Trial, Leasing Co. L.P.
865 Aldan Or
an
Vehicle Maintenance
ds Wwtw
I.dtve
14461Hoccesdol. Ina
920 Aiddn Drive
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
VSQG
Led Add Bananas
Active
144 Howeslo Inc.
920 Aldan Days
an
Vehcle Maintenance
VSQG
Otl
Active
1445 Hoomstat Inc.
920 Alddn Dew
Eagan
Vehicle Mabee.ree
VS2GO
FRm
Active
1445 Hoovedo Inc.
920 Alddn Dave
Ea an
Vehide Maintenance
VSQG
reacent Lanes,
Active
/445 Hoov.ld Ina
920 Aldrin Dave
Eg.
VeNtle Main.
VSOG
Aburrieze
Active
1445 Hasawmi, Ina
820 Aldan Drive
Eagan
Vehicle Meme.res,
VSOG
River Washer - Systownt
Active
1445 HoowistoL Inc.
920 AIddn Dew
Eanalt
E ui"rd Repair
MOO
/Adhesive
Active
1464IKON OMce Scald.
915 Blue Gamlen Road
an
d d Repair
MOG
end
Active
1464 IKON Office S.W.
915 BluGalen Road
Eagan
E md Repair
MOG
ed hear all
Active
1464 IKON Offew Sokdlons
915BluGentanRoad
False
VSQG
dWasher
Active
1468 Asaodaed Material Hand4
roo
85 81m, Denim Road -Efi
n
Rated
VSOG
01
helve
468 Associated MalerW HandO
835 She, Genian Road
Rel
VSOG
M
1488 Associated Materal Handling
935 Bear Gentn Road
n
Rela/
SOO
wrecent La
Acte
1488 A.acated Metered Handl
9Ble Golden Road
an
Rake
VSOG
Oil Barbara,
Active
14 Associated MaNdal Heading035
Bus Gentian Read
an
Relel
VSQG
L Acid Belleri.
Active
1468 Associated Material Head)
935 Bloa Genian Road
an
E d nt Re ir
VS]G
ree
I.
1477 Philippi E mem G
2875 H 55
en
mad tr
VSQG
01
Active
1477 d d
2075 X hwa 55
Eenn
E tdmend Rome
VSOG
I FIRM
Active
1477 Phil E uiroam Cam
2875 Aw55Eagan
d md Re
VSOG
ed OI Sorbed
Active
u77 Philippi d mem
2875 H Na 55
n
E .MR
VSOG
Washer Solved
Active
1477 PN I met C
28758 55
Eagan
E d mem Repair
VSQG
wresecent/Me Les
Ate
1477 Phi I E d d C
2875 H 65
Eagan
E d Repair
VSQG
L Add Batteries
1477 Philippi Egtipmrs
2875 H 55
Eagan
Eindinnert Repair
VSOG
POW Thinner
M
7I E tdmad Co
4527Rli
2675 Ice 55
Eagan
p
E d md Repair
VSOG
ed 08
BA
Fischer T
2815 Hear 55
d rhea R
VSOG
OI Fliers
M Ne
1621 Bob Flesher T
2875 65
an
d Re
VSOG .
Active I
1521113obFisducTrucking
12815 Hn 55
Eagan
Environmenklow • •
Lona Oak Bus nose Park, Eagan - EfiW
October 6, 2006
HadWaste Genestos
TYPE
SIZE
I I WASTE
STATUS
GENERATOR} GENERATOR
SITE ADDRESS
city
inent Repair
VSOG
1011 Sorberde
Active
1521 Bob Fleenor Truck
2815 55
Eagan
invot Repay
Wesher SoivOM
Active
1621 Bob Fischer Truck
2816 55
W Repair
Lead Acid Enter.
Active
1521 Bob Fischer Tedu
2815 55
Equipsourf Ra
Fl cent
Active
1521 Bob Fischer T
2815 %
Eamn
BMHI Moslem.
Wiled OU
ActNa
1608 Sehodlw Elevaer Co
876 Sias Gordian
an
Build) Melntarence
OI Sorbents
Active
1608 Sehudler Elevelor Co .
875 Blue Gordian
n
Bidding; Mabderence
G
fl M Le
Active
i SeNndlerElevator cam.
875 Blue Gordian
Eagan
Gu idowererce
G
M
Active
1608 SddntllerElovalor
875 Blue GOMkm
Ellison
Equipireve Repair
G
Fl
Active
181 Fisher SM Ca
885 Ellie Gentlen Rd.
E -Man
ul R
G
G Clnsner
ACINe
161 FhdmrSiaCo.
396 Blue Gentian RQ
Ee nEcpjlpw.M
Re
G
rtswasherSdvaM
AdNe
181 Fisher SM Co.
895 Slue Gerdlen Rd.
EaganE
uimere Re ao
IVSQG
G
nsWasher- ueohe
Active
181 Fisher Sia Co.
896 glue German Rtl.
EaganMa"ad
er
Active
181 Great Western Chemical Co .
817 Lane Oak Rd. Sole 100
EdisonMerndacl
Ndo Acid
Active
181 Great Western Chemical Co.
817 Lone Oak Rd. Suss 100
EMMVeMde
Maintenance
G
WaalwSoWerd
AdWe
181 T 21 Ire
92D All
EwnManures
G
Fl
Active
ISM HRI North Amerke
900 bRd.
Ee n
Manufas
G
Prins Washer Solvent
Active
1631 HPII NorthMnerlea
900 Ib Rd.
an
G
Fads
Active
1831 HRI NonhARsrka
800 to Rd.
Eaan
Mentes
G
V OI
AdNe
1631 HRH Norm America
900 %Rd.
Ea n
Meadq
G
O Sebents
Active
1631 HRI Nord America
800 b Rd.EaganMamdq
G
Bdllesle
Active
16311HRINoMMrerica
800 Apolip Rd.
Manufacturing
VSOG
Industrial Fleas
Active
1631HRI Nord Amerlce
900 Apollo Rd.
Eumn
BUIdIM Mauderares
VSQG
Fl mmeble Gash
Active
1632IRoadvial, EWM, Ina
2050 Lore Oak Circle
Eamn
Buildim Maintenance
VSQG
sold
Inactive
iWRoadway Express. Inc
2850 Lore Oak Coda
Eagedr,
Buildinit Maintenance
VSOG
Add BeBerles
Active
1632 Roe Express, ins
2950 Lore Oak Ctrds
Eagan
Bsb - Maddereree
VSOG
tds Llquwa
Ad Ns
1632 Roadway Equess, Arc
29W Lore Oak Circle
Eagan
Bullding Metrderenee
VSOG
Flcant Lasses,
Active
1632 R,,dm Inc.
2950 Lone Oak Circle
Ea
Bullift Malnlernew,
VSQG
rid
AMNO
1632 Roadmy Espresso, Inc.
2950 Lone Oak Cede
Eagen
Vehicle Maintenance
MQG
PdM1s Washer
AcMe
1633 Truck Service Center
205011 Oak. Cud.
Eagan
Vehicle Mairmnerce
MOG
Uied OB
ACMe
1633 Truck SeMce Corder
2050 Laren Oak. Code
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
MOG
00 Fliers
Ache
1 M3 Truck Service Corder
2950 Lore Oaks Code
Eagan
VeMde Meodarence
MOG
ONS dmm -
Active
ISM Truck SeMce Cenler
2950 Lore Oske Circle
Eagan
Vehicle Metrdarerce
MOG
Liked Acid Batteries
hive
1833 Thick Service Center
2050 Lane Oaks Code
Estser,
Vehicle Maintenance
MOG
Addireass,
Active
ISM Truck Sentra Corder
2850 Lore Oaks Ckds
Eamn
Vehicle Maintenance
MOO -
Uded OI
Active
7670 NOM Ste Dlesel
837 Apollo Rd.
Eagan
Venda Maintenance
MQG
O FROM
Active
1670 North SterDladd
837 Apolls Rd.
Eagan
Vehicle Maodemrce
MOG
FlLormcaM III
Acte
1670 NoM Sler Diesel
837 Ib Rd.
Eagan
VehiW MaMenarca
MQG
Militarize
Active
167014oMSler Dlesel
837 Apono Rd.
Vehicle Maintenance
MOG
Ldad Add Batteries
Active
ISM NmIh SW Diesel
837 APOUD Rd.
Eadian
Vehicle Maintenance
MQG
pdd Washer -Cuda
ASW,
1670 North Sler Clesel
837 ApolloRd.
Vehicle Maintenance
VSOG
1PArts Washer Solvent
Active
1 Transport international Pool Inc.
3165 Dodd Rd
Easan
VeMde Maintenance
U On
Active
1 Tre n International Pool Inc.
3165 Dodd Rd.
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
O Fllee
Active
low Transport Intemstbrrel Pool Inc.
3165 Dodd Rd.
Eagan
Vehicle Maintenance
L Add galleries
Active
1680 T A InlertsUeal Pool Inc-
3165 Dodd Rd
Eagan
Vehicle McMenance
I Funs
Iredlve
1 T Irtlena0onal Pod bra
3185 Dodd Rd.
EUMBulb
Manse a ce
b Palo
A.dNe
low Trod Lone Oak Lutheran School
2850 55
n
:VSCQIG
Film
Act"
1713 Fln11 LMs Inc.
2700 glue Water Rend SMle 450
n
PrWI
rScII
ActNe
1713 F1s11 on IDUs Ina
2700 Elm Water Road SMle 450
Ea
PNiti
Fl rd Subs
hdNe
1713 First i rescon Me Inc.
2700 glue Water Rood Suite 450
Ea an
PrMI
Pdris Solved
Active
171 Flsll nLlhoInc.
2700 One Weler Road Suite 460
Ea en
PrYUI
A.ct"
171 Fistl mesion Llho Inc.
2700 BlueWater Road SuMe 450
Ee
Prodi
I
Active
171 First) Lkhu Inc.
2700 Elm Water Rmd Sudle460
Printing -
VSQG
a.
Active
1713 Flat hrouression Litho Inc.
27W Blue Water Road Suite 450
Prinilm
VSOG
P4= Wash
Active
1713 First l eselon Live Inc.
2700 Sim Water Road Suite 450
PrWIng
VSOG •
Fdtmlein Sulu on
Inacllve
1713 Fist finpression Leho Inc.
2700 Blue Water Road. Sulo 450
Edison
Photography
MOG
M Film
Active,
1734 Reylval Consocelo.
930 Blue Gentian Road Suite 1000
an
Ret a
MOG
Sdulbn
Active
1734 R Co lion
930 Blue Gordian Road SWI. 1000
Ee sn
Rot
VSOG
kerSokdion
A<1Ne.
1744 Won
2880 Comnxre Dr. Suite 600
En
Phot
VSOG
Solution
Ac1Ne
1744 Lacon
298D Commers Or. Sive 800
Ea an
Photography
VSQG
IN ascent La
Active
1741 Union
2980 Commons Dc Suite 600
11
j
Environmental Review
Lone Oak Bowness Park,: Eagan -W
October S. 2006
Na: Waste Gumm..
TYPE
SIZE
1
I
WASTE
TUS GENERATORi GENERATOR
SITEADDRESS
City
Photography
VSOG
Fln,
1749 Lason
2980 Common, Dr.SW1e 800
Eagan
Manned
VSOG
Ua
01
17 IOK Mhuraeola
880 a Rd.
en
Mended
Maadecl
VSOG
VSOG
Fl nM Buena
011 Ilea
'
1 KIK Mlnaeda
1) KIK Mkmeada
990 lo Rd.
990 loRd.
en
EsuanVSOG
Pe
Washer
17 MK Mbmesota
990 b Rd.
Ee n
VeNde Maintenance
MOG
U
OB
1778 Pre Sto
850 Lone Oak Rd.
Ea n
VeNde Maintenance
MQG
U
Ol FRea
1778 Ro Sia
850 Lam Oak Rd.
EagartVehicle
Mekdenance
VeNde Mabdenance
Maldanance
MOG
VSQG
VSW
VSOG
Fl
Re
cent
00
OB FRere
e
e
I
1778 Pre30
1815 BobFbchsrT
. 7875 BobFadesT
1875 Bob Factor T
850 Lam Oak Rd.
3110 M/a Colba Dr.
3110MaeCd lY Dr.
3110 MOa Contra Dr.
Ea n
an
EaMowers.
EacenMaideranee
VSOG
OII
rbank
e
1815 Bob Fkdr lr
3110 Mke Collm Dr.
E n
Makaenance
VSOG
Pa
WesMr SoMd
e
Fact rT
3110 Mke CoNre Dr.
an
Malreamme
VSOG
L
PCN Ballenin
e
FkctarT
3110 MOs CoOhw Dr.
Ea an
Matrexance
VSOG
Fl
e
FkctarT
3170MkeCo0beDr.
Eagene
E aCrea Ina
it3prbd�
82D Oo SWe tOD
Eagan
dwi -
VSOG
adNml
e
Fd.. CraaO Ina
920 Rd Suite 100
Eapart
MenWedud -
VSOG
T
N Daveio r
PCINe
Nrere LLC
2935 Walare Rd.SWIe 180
EMM
Mewled
VSOG
I
Almlal
PClive
were LLC
2835 Waters Rd,Suite 180
Eagan
ManWad
VSOG
t Bnards
MNe
19LLC
2835 Walere Rtl, SWe 180
MarKftdUrUV
M"act
VSOG
Solulbn
Film
Alae
Ne1932
1934PrInIvave LLC
Pddwere LLC -
2935 Waters Rd Sure 160
2935 Waters Rd Suite 180
Espan
E.
ManWad
VSOG
Fl
reaced Bulbs
Ac1Ne
1932 Prinlwere LLC
2835 Wft%M Rtl SWw 160
n
Manacled
Mond
VSW
VSOG
EI
Nce
d
MNe
Inactiva
193 Prbdware LLC
1932 Printware LLC
2935 Waters Rd Suite 160
2935 Waters Rd Sule 180
an
Ea
Printing
PrMi
VSOG
VSOG
Fl
wash
lirrma.
MNe
PCI'.
1987 night LLC
1961 Copy RI N LLC
3177 Dodd Rd
3177 Dodd Rd
Ea
Ea an
P"M
PSI
VSOG
Ac81
A.E.ia
Ca RI N LLC
1951 Copy Right.
3177 Dodd Rd
3177 Dodd Rd
an
En n
RMI
Werehotse
VSOG
MOG
Chord®b
Wd
Active
Inactive
7981 Copy Rigid LLC
IjR I&dpWCo. APC -
3177 Dodd Rd
850 Apoln Rd Salle 780
Eman
Ee
•
••
0
October 10, 2006
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Eagan
3 83 0 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Wescott Road Street Revitalization
City Project No. 943
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Attached is our report for the Wescott Road, Pilot knob Road to Denmark Avenue, Street
Revitalization, City Project No. 943. The report presents and discusses the proposed
improvements and includes a cost estimate, preliminary assessment roll and schedule.
We would be pleased to meet with the City Council at your convenience to review and
discuss the contents of this report.
Sincerely,
John P. Gorder, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
I hereby certify that this report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Licensed Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
John P. Gorder
Date: Reg. No. 22813
Reviewed By:
Dept. of Public Works Date:
Reviewed By:
Finance Dept.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Letter of Transmittal/Certification
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction.......................................................................................................I
Scope................................................................................................................. 2
Feasibilityand Recommendations..............................................................................3
Street Evaluation.................................................................................................. 3
ProposedImprovements......................................................................................:...4
Easements/Permits................................................................................................ 6
CostEstimate...................................................................................................... 6
Assessments........................................................................................................ 6
Low Density Residential............................................................................... 7
Assessment Financing Options..............,................................................................... 7
RevenueSource .................... :.............................................................................. 8
ProjectSchedule....................................................................................................8
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Appendix B
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Appendix C
Figures - 1
- 2A &B
- 3
Location Map
Street Improvement/Assessment Area Map
Typical Section — Overlay
Based on the data and engineering strategies available at this time, the City's current PMP
incorporates local and ongoing maintenance strategies with seal coating occurring as needed at 5
to 7 years, again at 12 to 14 years with a bituminous overlay at approximately 20 years.
Overlaying these roadways located within the project area, which are mainly in the 20 to 25 year
time frame, will prevent further decay of the pavement surface, thus protecting and extending the
structural life of the street.
Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous patching, crack sealing and seal coating have
occurred at appropriate intervals during the life of the street pavements. The street in the
neighborhood was crack sealed in 1990 and then seal coated in 2000.
The Public Works maintenance program typically includes patching and refurbishing during the
construction season prior to the overlay. The Public Works crews, as part of the Preparatory
Pavement Management Plan, removed and replaced deteriorated pavement areas and placed
leveling and maintenance overlays on portions of the streets under consideration, if necessary.
These repairs alone will not substantially extend the life expectancy of the street pavements if
not combined with the proposed structural bituminous overlay proposed with this project.
The Public Works Department has also inspected the utility infrastructure (sanitary sewer, water
main, and storm sewer) in the project area and determined the system is in good working order
and that no major repairs are necessary.
Scone
This project provides for resurfacing (edge mill and overlay) approximately 0.45 miles of
Wescott Road. Figure 2, located in Appendix C, illustrates the project area.
Included in this project is the replacement of the damaged curb and gutter, adjustments and/or
replacement to sanitary/storm sewer utility castings, water gate valves, street signage, and
pedestrian ramps.
Wescott Road
Page 2
Feasibility and Recommendations
This project is necessary to prevent further decay of the pavement section, create a safer driving
surface, increase ride -ability and add structural strength.
This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement (resurfacing) is considerably less
expensive than complete reconstruction of this street.
This project is feasible from an engineering standpoint in that this type of improvement has been
used successfully to extend the life expectancy of numerous other streets throughout the City and
the region.
This project is in accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (2007 – 2011) for the
City of Eagan and the schedule as outlined in the Pavement Management Program. It is
recommended that the project be constructed as proposed in this report in conjunction with other
similar projects throughout the City.
Street Evaluation
The City of Eagan's Pavement Management System allows the City to evaluate the condition of
the existing street surface to help schedule timely maintenance and improvements. The
Pavement Condition Index (PCI) ranks the surface condition for each street. The general
categories that define PCI rankings are as follows:
PCI Recommended Improvement
56 - 100 Routine Maintenance/Crack Seal/Seal Coat
36 _-55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay
FO -3-5 Reconstruct
The 2006 PCI ranking for this portion of Westcott Road has an average pavement condition
rating of *45* which falls in the "Patch/Repair and/or Overlay" category. Therefore, with the
rating and the age of the street, the 2007 construction season is the optimal time to construct the
bituminous overlay.
Wescott Road
Page 3
Proposed Improvements
Pavement - The proposed street improvements are shown in
Figure 3. The existing street section consists of 4 1/2"
bituminous pavement supported by 10" gravel base and
granular sub grade material. The existing bituminous
surface will be milled adjacent to the existing curb and
gutter (6'-8' wide) to accommodate a 1'/s -inch bituminous
overlay. The overlay, combined with the existing street
section, will provide a street section consistent with current City standards for a residential street.
The combination of patching, and overlay will not eliminate cracking due to the temperature
extremes experienced in Minnesota. Bituminous overlays will show some continued frost
movements and reflective cracking consistent with,the underlying pavement. Routine
maintenance will still need to continue under the City's Pavement Management Program.
Concrete curb & gutter - Damaged curb and gutter will be
severely cracked,
spalled, or settled. It is estimated that approximately 6% of the existing concrete curb and gutter
will have to be replaced. Boulevard sod will be removed and replaced by a new 2' wide roll
behind each section of curb and gutter that is replaced. While the contractor who performs the
work is responsible for it's establishment in the fust 30 days after placement, adjacent residents
are encouraged to consistently water the new sod to help ensure its growth. A guide to
maintenance of the sod will be distributed to the residents prior to this construction activity.
Wescott Road
Page 4
J �
'y � Y iJ.i r '. ':.
4; _
�. � i 111 �I I I I.'_ _.
i.:
Easement/Permits
All work will be in the public right-of-way. No additional easements will be necessary. It is
anticipated that no permits will be required for the resurfacing project.
Wescott Road is a municipal state aid collector route, and therefore, Minnesota Department of
Transportation State Aid plan approval of construction plans will be required.
Cost Estimate
Detailed cost estimates are located in Appendix A.. The estimates are based on anticipated 2007
construction costs and include a 5% contingency and indirect cost of 30%, which include legal,
administration, engineering, and bond interest. A summary of the costs is as follows:
• Edge Mill and Overlay w/ signage costs $,102,640
• Repair Existing Concrete Curb & Gutter 21,280
Total Cost $1231920
Assessments
Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties for the total improvement
with costs allocated in accordance with the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for a mill
and overlay improvement for local streets. All assessments will be revised based on final costs.
A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B.
Wescott Road
Page 6
City Special Assessment Policy
Assessment Ratio
Property City
Mill and Overlay w/ Signage Costs
• Public Facility 50% 50%
Repair Existing Concrete Curb and Gutter 0% 100%
Public Facility - All public facility properties (Dakota County -Wescott Library & City
Municipal Center) having direct access on to Wescott Road are proposed to be assessed, based
on the amount of front footage adjacent to the street within the project area. The City's
Assessment Policy states that 75% of the mill and overlay costs are assessable for these
properties. The estimated cost per front foot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy
is $19.26/ Front Foot and is calculated as follows:
1) % Public Facility =1,233 ff. / 4,086 (total ff.) = 30.2%
2) [$123,920 (Mill & Overlay Cost) x 75% x 30.2% x 44/52] = $23,750 [Total Public
Facility Assessment]
3) $23.750 (Total Public Facility Assessment) 4 $19.26/ F.F.
1,233 Public Facility F.F.
Assessment Financing Options
The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full
assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is
included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over five years with the
interest determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements. The
following payment schedule will result based on an estimated 5.5% interest for the assessed
amounts:
Per $1,000 Assessment
Wescott Road
Page 7
Principal
Per Year
Interest
Per Year
Cost
Per Year
First Year
$200
$55
$255
Fifth Year
$200
$11
$211
Wescott Road
Page 7
Revenue Source
A summary of revenue sources is listed below:
The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $100,180 (80.8% of
total), and the City's property assessment of $11,050.
Proiect Schedule
Present Feasibility Report to City Council/
Order Public Hearing....................:.....................................October 17, 2006
Public Hearing......................................................................November 21, 2006
MnDOT — Approval of Plans and Specifications ........................................... January, 2007
City Council — Approval of Plans and Specifications .................................... January, 2007
Award Contract............................................................................. February, 2007
Project Completion.............................................................................August 1, 2007
Final Cost Report .......................................................................... September, 2007
Final Assessment Hearing..................................................................................... Fall, 2007
First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement..................................May 15, 2008
Wescott Road
Page 8
Project Cost
Property Assessment
City Contribution
Mill and Overlay w/
Signa&e
$102,640
$23,740
($78,900)
Repair Existing Curb
$21,280
-0-
($21,280)
Totals
$ 123,920
$23,740
$100,180
The City's Major Street Fund will finance the estimated project deficit of $100,180 (80.8% of
total), and the City's property assessment of $11,050.
Proiect Schedule
Present Feasibility Report to City Council/
Order Public Hearing....................:.....................................October 17, 2006
Public Hearing......................................................................November 21, 2006
MnDOT — Approval of Plans and Specifications ........................................... January, 2007
City Council — Approval of Plans and Specifications .................................... January, 2007
Award Contract............................................................................. February, 2007
Project Completion.............................................................................August 1, 2007
Final Cost Report .......................................................................... September, 2007
Final Assessment Hearing..................................................................................... Fall, 2007
First Payment Due with Property Tax Statement..................................May 15, 2008
Wescott Road
Page 8
Appendix A -Street Overlay - City Project No. 943
Preliminary Cost Estimate
Wescott Road
Rituminous Street Overlav
Item
Unit
Est.
Unit
Price
Est.
Cost
Mobilization
L.S.
1
$2,500.00
$2,500
Mill Bituminous Pavement
S.Y.
3200
$1.25
$4,000
Type 2350/60 Wear Course Mixture
Ton
1300
$40.00
$52,000
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal.
660
$1.50
$990
Replace Traffic & Street Signs
L.S.
1
$4,500.00
$4,500
4 -Inch White Striping
L.F.
4,800
$0.50
$2,400
4 -Inch Double Yellow Striping
L.F.
4,800
1 $1.00
$4,800
12 -Inch Yellow Striping
L.F.
1,000
$2,000
$2,000
Traffic Control
L.S.
1
$2,000.00
$2,000
Subtotal
$75,190
+5%
Contingencies
$3,760
Subtotal
$78+950
+30%
Indirect Costs
$23,690
TOTAL
$102,640
Repair Existing Concrete Curb &
Gutter
Item
Unit
Est.
Q .
Unit
Price
Est.
Cost
Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter
L.F.
300
$6.00
$1,800
B618 Concrete Curb and Gutter
L.F.
300
$16.00
$4,800
7" Concrete Valley Gutter
S.Y.
130
$50.00
$6,500
Adjust Frame & Ring Casting C.B)
Each
4
$200.00
$800
Sod w/To soil
S.Y.
80
$10.00
$800
Bituminous Driveway Patching
S.Y.
1 20
$24.00
$480
4" Concrete Ped Ramp w/ Wet Cast for
Truncated Dome Inset
S.F.
90
$4.50
$410
Subtotal
$15,590
+5%
Contingencies
$780
Subtotal
$16,370
+ 30% Indirect Costs
$4,910
Total Curb & Gutter I $21,2801
TOTAL PROJECT COST $123,920
e 0
-4
-fit.
14606b
Ro
Appendix B - City Project No. 943
Preliminary Assessment Roll
Wescott Road
Street Overlay
Parcel (Public Facility)
P.I.N.
Front
Rate
Footage
/ F.F
Total
Ted Wachter Addition
(City Municipal Center
10-75300-010-01
574
$19.26
$11,050
1340 WESCOTT RD
Dakota Coimty Lib
10-75300-020-01
659
$19.26
$12,690
Totals
1,233
1$23,740
Wescott Road Street Improvement Fig.1
City of Eaan Location Map - Project 943
Engineer ng Department
Executive Summary
Introduction
Eagan's natural character is defined in large part by water. From the City's northwest
boundary formed by the Minnesota River to the pristine wetlands and small lakes of
Lebanon Hills Regional Park in the southern portion of the community, the City has
celebrated its abundance of water resources as an integral part of the quality of life it
offers residents and visitors. Emblematic of the special regard the community has felt
for its water was the adoption of the Eagan Water Quality Management Plan in 1990, the
first community—wide plan in the state aimed specifically at protecting the quality of
lakes. From this award winning plan in 1990, the City developed a program that was
recognized in 1996 with a 1st place national award by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency. And the City's residents have taken up the banner. In a scientific survey of
residents conducted in 2005, 99% indicated that good water quality was very or
somewhat important to them.
Much has been accomplished. Despite a 40% increase in the City's population and the
addition of thousands of acres of development since 1990, water quality in the City's top
seven recreational lakes has stayed the same or improved over that time period. The
City has installed boat landings, trails, and fishing piers to improve public access. A
quality sport fishery has developed in many of the City's lakes, and the City has active
control programs for aquatic invasive species. Finally, Eagan residents are well-educated
on water quality issues, thanks in part to communication initiatives by the City.
But more needs to be done. Some City lakes will not meet new water quality standards
mandated by state and federal regulations. City staff are shouldering additional
responsibilities to meet new regional, state and federal mandates for urban stormwater
and wetlands management. Finally, our understanding ofhow aquatic and wetland
systems function is improving continually and the tools to manage those systems are
evolving. These changes must be tracked, evaluated, and incorporated as appropriate in
the City's approach to managing its water resources.
City of Eagan i
ater Quadty Management Plan—Agency Review Draft Project 49-05-132
The Process
To help meet these challenges, the City Council in 2005 established a 13 -member Water
Quality Task Force to guide the development of the upgraded Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP). The Task Force represented a range of technical and policy
experts, agency staff familiar with the community, and local citizens, including two City
Council members. Between October 2005 and August 2006, the Task Force met eight
times to provide input on important aspects of the plan, particularly regarding goals and
policies, lake and wetland classification and management standards, establishment of
management priorities, and the overall program for system improvements.
The WQMP that came out of this process gives the City the tools it needs to continue its
progressive leadership in municipal water resources management and propel its "state
of the art" program into the 216t Century. A major challenge is to implement this plan in
a cost-effective way while acknowledging ever increasing demands for limited financial
resources. In a phrase, 'limited resources, smartly applied" describes the approach
desired by the Task Force to achieving the goals of the Plan.'
Existing System
One of the major challenges of water resources protection and improvement in a nearly
fully developed community like Eagan is dealing with the effects of the existing storm
drainage infrastructure. A series of comprehensive storm drainage planning efforts in
the 1960s, 1970s, and early 1980s allowed Eagan to develop into the eighth largest City in
Minnesota. These efforts were made during a time when flood protection was the order
of the day across the nation and when the impacts of stormwater runoff on water quality
were barely recognized.
Current water quality issues in many of the City's lakes and wetlands is directly related
to a largely irreversible system configuration that routes runoff from urbanized areas
through these water features. This is the starting point of this plan. The City must find
ways of making the stormwater system as water quality friendly as possible, including
decreasing the amount of stormwater entering the system where feasible. This requires
attention to "state of the art" thinking, both in the development of this WQMP and the
implementation of the program in the future.
City of Eagii
Watn ity manV,.ent Plan—AMcy Reoina Draft Project 49-05132
Other Players
When it comes to stormwater management and wetland protection, there are other
agencies with whom the City must interact and coordinate. Among the most significant
are:
■ Metropolitan Council. This regional planning agency has long focused
on stormwater quality improvement in municipalities. of the seven county
Metro area. Updated stormwater management plans for all communities
in the Metro area will be needed to support the community
comprehensive plan updates that are due in 2008.
■ Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR). This agency oversees
administration of the state Wetlands Conservation Act by local
governments and must approve any local wetland management plan
developed by a local government. This revised Plan contains such a
wetlands plan for Eagan.
s Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). This agency has major
responsibilities in the management of designated public waters (of which
there are over 60 in Eagan), including development of public access,
fisheries management, and water level control.
Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This agency has wide-ranging and
high profile regulatory, research, and planning responsibilities for
implementing the federal Total Maximum Daily Load (MDL) and
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) programs.
These programs are major justifications behind this Plan revision.
Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization (GCLWMO).
A local water management organization, the GCLWMO includes a
majority portion of Eagan as well as much smaller areas of Inver Grove
Heights and Mendota Heights. The City's revised Plan must be in
compliance with the WMO's plan.
City of Eagan
�VJater Qu icy Management Plan—Agency Rwiem Draft Project 49-05-132
Each of these agencies relies on the cooperation of local governments like Eagan to help
meet its mandates, though several have powerful regulatory authority as well. Many of
these organizations also offer technical and/or financial assistance that is of value to the
City. Representatives of all of the organizations above were included on the Water
Quality Task Force. Thus, this WQMP is the culmination of an effort that involved
experts at many levels of government to forge a re -vitalized strategy for water quality
and wetlands management tailored to Eagan's needs and desires.
Goals and Policies
The vision of the City s program is as follows:
The quality of lakes, wetlands, and streams in Eagan
meets or exceeds City, regional, state, and federal
requirements and community expectations.
The WQMP maps out a strategy to achieve this vision through a series of wide-ranging
goals and supporting policies that position the City for the next level of water quality
and wetland protection. The goals and some of the key supporting policies are
highlighted below:
1. Manage surface water resources using scientifically -based, common sense
approaches. Supporting policies include:
Managing lakes to achieve a clearwater condition with an abundant and
diverse native rooted aquatic plant community
Combining watershed control measures with in -lake management
measures
Managing high priority lakes according to individual lake management
plans
2. Control watershed loadings to help meet or exceed surface water quality
requirements. Reaching this goal will include:
■ Promoting compliance with statewide no -phosphorus fertilizer
regulations
s Continuing to implement a regular and targeted street sweeping program
■ Increasing awareness of, and enforce, the City's prohibition on dumping
into the storm drainage system
City ,Eagan iv
afn Qualt17 gemen!Plan-Agency Pe—D-- PrOed 4945-132
3. Protect surface water resources from impacts of land development and
re -development activities. This includes:
■ Requiring and enforcing construction site erosion and sediment control
for land development activities
■ . Requiring new development and re -development activities to incorporate
stormwater management features that meet strict performance standards
for treating and infiltrating runoff from their site
4. Manage wetlands in compliance with all regulations and according to
community's values and priorities. The wetland management strategies in
this WQMP exceed state requirements, which reflects the high priority the
community places on its wetland resources. Important elements include
protective buffers around certain wetlands and projects to enhance the
ecological diversity of some wetlands in public areas.
5. Foster citywide support for surface water management goals through an
active education program. Supporting policies include:
s Holding at least one community -wide forum per year to discuss water
quality and wetland protection issues
s Educating City staff to set a good example in the community for water
quality and wetland protection by the way they conduct their duties as
employees
■ Continuing and improving the City's education and outreach program to
engage citizens in water quality and wetland protection
Key Implementation Elements
The real measure of success of the upgraded WQMP will be its implementation.
A community -wide comprehensive plan like this one plays a valuable role in setting
standards for affected parties, identifying priorities, defining expectations, and
providing guidance and direction on key issues. Following is a brief summary of the
key implementation elements in this WQMP.
f City of Eagan o
afnQuality ManagemmtP n-Agmq Rmina Draft PWF- 49-05-132
4
Requirements for New and Re -Development
Activities
The increase in impervious cover associated with new and re -development activities is a
primary factor behind increases in surface runoff and pollutant loading to the City's .
lakes and wetlands. In the last two years, the MPCA has required cities to limit the total
amount of certain pollutants to no more than the pre -development condition of the site.
Based on both these factors, Eagan's Plan requires new development activity creating
more than th acre of new impervious surface to achieve the more restrictive of the
following:
■ no -net -increase in the amount of two key pollutants phosphorus and
suspended solids- compared to the pre -development condition or
■ an established removal of pollutants from stormwater
Similarly, re -development activities will be required to avoid any increase in pollutant
loading from the previous development condition.
Equally important, under most conditions, the City will require developers to infiltrate
runoff before it leaves sites of new and re -development activities. Compared to the.
traditional approaches of the 1990 plan, the new infiltration standards of this WQMP
could reduce runoff by 50 to 70 percent. These measures will enhance groundwater
recharge, decrease the burden on the stone drainage system, and minimize the pollutant
loads reaching high priority downstream waterbodies.
The City will provide guidance to developers to meet these requirements, but
developers will be responsible to incorporate into their site design such practices as are
necessary to meet the above performance standards. A cash dedication in lieu of on-site
treatment may be collected at the City's discretion where the City determines it is either
not desirable or not feasible to achieve the applicable performance standards within the
development or re -development site.
f City Q,Eagan vi
ate uality Egg:
tPlan — Agency Rmieu Draft- Project 4MS-132
NPDES and TMDL Requirements
In 2003, as part of the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency began
requiring municipalities to obtain permits to discharge stormwater. In Minnesota, the
MPCA administers these permits under the NPDES MS4 program. The 5 -year NPDES
Permit obtained by the City in 2003 required preparation of a Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and submission of an Annual Report. Each annual report
must summarize the following:
■ Compliance with permit conditions, including an assessment of the
appropriateness of identified management practices and progress
towards achieving identified measurable goals for six minimum control
measures
■ Planned stormwater management activities during the next reporting
cycle
■ Changes in identified management practices or measurable goals for any
of the control measures
As part of the revised NPDES permit program in 2005, the MPCA selected 30
municipalities most likely to have had expanded stormwater discharges to surface
waters since 1980. As one of the selected municipalities, Eagan is required to complete
additional work by October 1, 2007 to enable the MPCA to determine if the City has met
state rules for nondegradation of water quality. This additional work includes assessing
the increases of pollutant and discharge loads, writing a recovery and protection plan,
and modifying the City's SWPPP to include the assessment and plan.
Every two years, the federal Clean Water Act requires the states to publish an updated
list of streams and lakes that are not meeting their designated uses because of excess
pollutants. The Impaired Waters List—also known as the 303(d) list—is based on
violations of state water quality standards and is organized by river basin. For a surface
water to be listed, historical monitoring and. assessment must indicate it is impaired by
one or more pollutants.
� City of Eagan vii
afn Qua i!y Managcment Plan —Agmry Reoiera Draft Prgect 49-05-132
Once the MPCA assigns a surface water to the 303(d) list, it requires a detailed strategy
be developed and implemented within a specific time frame to meet water quality
standards. This strategy is commonly known as a Total Maximum Daily Load study or
plan (TMDL). A TMDL study identifies both point and nonpoint sources of each
pollutant that is causing impairment of a surface water. Water quality sampling and
computer modeling determine how much each pollutant must be reduced to assure the
water quality standard is met. Three Eagan lakes and the Minnesota River in Eagan are
on the 2006 Impaired Waters List.
The City will initiate its TMDLs in advance of the required start/complete dates of the
MnPCA). Generally, the City will take the lead to complete and implement TMDLs for .
impaired waters whose watersheds are located wholly within the City boundaries.
For impaired waters whose watersheds extend into adjacent communities, the City may
request the appropriate watershed management authority either to take the lead (with
the City participating as needed) or to co -facilitate the completion and implementation
of the TMDL. For TMDLs that have regional implications, the City will cooperate with
lead agencies (e.g., with the State of Minnesota for the Minnesota River). Part of this
involvement will be aimed at assuring due acknowledgment and consideration is
granted the City for its extensive efforts since 1990 to control urban nonpoint source
inputs to the impaired water. Impairment status of each of the City's priority lakes is an
important factor in establishing the prioritization system that will guide lake
managementefforts.
Local Wetland Management Plan
Wetlands provide a variety of services (called "functions") valued by the City and its
residents. Wetlands are a critical part of the natural storm drainage system in City of
Eagan, and help to maintain water quality, reduce flooding and erosion, provide food
and habitat for wildlife, and provide open spaces and natural landscapes that many
residents enjoy.
Included in the WQMP is a Local Comprehensive Wetland Protection and Management
Plan (LCWPMP) that is customized to meet Eagan's needs. The main purpose of the
LCWPMP is to provide the framework for local wetland conservation regulations. The
goal is to prioritize and manage Eagan's wetlands based on the functions they perform
and their values to the community. Standards for protection and enhancement of
wetland resources included in the LCWPMP are prioritized on this basis. Because the
functions and values provided by different wetlands vary, the LCWPMP presents an
assessment and classification system that will assist the City in establishing priorities
and focusing available resources for wetland protection, enhancement and restoration.
Because all wetlands provide some functional values, all are protected to some degree.
City of Eagan viii
afa i YMnnagcwnt Plan-Arnry Rwkw Draft Pwied 49-05-132
The LCWPMP provides the following benefits:
■ Includes wetland inventory, assessment, and management guidelines
■ Streamlines City administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA)
by providing sequencing and varied replacement standards based on
the functional values of the wetland and resulting management
classifications
■ Allows appropriate use of wetlands to preserve water quality and
prevent downstream flooding
■ Enhances wildlife values of wetlands
■ Identifies potential wetland banking areas
■ Protects/restores wetlands and adjacent resources that are important for
interconnected green space
■ Manage wetlands by their sensitivity to stormwater
Regulation of activities that may impact individual wetlands will be based on
evaluations of proposed activities, site-specific wetland boundary delineations, and
wetland management classifications.
This section of the WQMP also contains information on an rare and sensitive wetlands
called calcareous fens. Calcareous fens occur only where specific characteristics of
landform, bedrock and groundwater favor their development. They support unique
plant communities with a number of rare species, and are highly susceptible to
degradation due to changes in hydrology or nutrient regime. Two fens - Nicols Meadow
and Ft. Snelling - lie within the jurisdictional boundaries of Eagan at the base of the
bluffs in the Minnesota River Valley. Both are in Ft. Snelling State Park but can be
affected by stormwater management activities within Eagan. The City intends to do its
part to protect these unique resources, and guidance for those protective measures are
outlined in the WQMP.
City of Eagan ix
afn Quality Management Plan —Agency Revco Draft Project 49-05-132
Priority Water Body Designation and
Management
Water quality in the City's recreational lakes has been a driving force behind Eagan's
water quality management efforts over the last 15 years. Through the WQMP upgrade
process, 30 priority lakes were identified (including six in Lebanon Hills Regional Park),
taking into account such factors as the size of, and public access to, the waterbody.
Protecting and managing water quality in these lakes is a primary objective of this
WQMP. As part of this strategy, the City has developed a customized lake classification
system with measurable water quality goals for each lake. When met, those goals will
assure that a specific lake will also meet proposed state standards as well as watershed
management organization requirements.
The City will manage its lakes to achieve a clear -water condition with a diverse
community of plants dominated by native emergent and submergent species.
Lake scientists acknowledge this condition as natural for lakes in this region of
Minnesota. A healthy assemblage of native plants minirnizes the likelihood that non-
native plants will become a problem. State water quality standards also support
achieving this condition.
The City recognizes lakes as complex systems whose responses to numerous natural and
unnatural variables are not clearly predictable. Therefore, it will employ an "adaptive
management" approach to these important community resources. Adaptive
management is an ongoing, science -based process of testing; monitoring and evaluating,
and then applying new knowledge to modify future policies, strategies, and practices
based on findings and the needs of the community. Furthermore, there are never
enough data to eliminate uncertainty. Adaptive lake management emphasizes assessing
the impacts of management actions to a reasonable extent and applying lessons learned
to guide future actions, as progress is made toward goals.
'The City's understanding of how lakes function as well as the development of tools to
manage lakes has improved dramatically since Eagan adopted its first water quality
management plan. If anything, these changes likely will accelerate over the next 10-15
years. The City staff must keep abreast of these developments and pursue those of merit
to achieve the goals in this WQMP.
Lakes are not the only priority surface waters in the City. Eagan also borders the
Minnesota River and contains two designated trout stream segments. The WQMP
contains approaches for protection of these resources.
City of Eagan x
ater Qaality Management Plan — agency Review Draft Prajeet 49-05-132
Public Education
Education serves an important role in enabling Eagan to implement its stormwater, lake
water quality, and wetland management programs successfully. The City's emphasis on
water resources education has put Eagan at the forefront of municipal education
programs in the state. Several of the tools now in common use across the state were
initiated or developed by the City. These include catch basin stenciling (first
implemented by the City in 1992) and writing and production of the children's
educational play Toadilly Turtle, through a joint effort between the City, Gun Club Lake
WMO, and CLIMB Theatre of Mendota Heights in 1993.
Five principles will guide the City's future efforts in water resources education, as
summarized briefly below:
1. The goal is to change the way people consider water resources. First,
change what people know, then the way they think, and finally the way they
act.
2. Allocate educational effort appropriately. In general, a base level of effort
will be applied everywhere in the community, but extra effort will be
directed in known "hot spots," areas with high loading risks to priority water
bodies.
3. Good public education generates and sustains program support. Water
resources education raises awareness of problems and offers opportunities to
show the City is solving those problems. These efforts also can foster
productive working partnerships with groups of interested citizens, which
can generate even more support and visibility for protection efforts.
4. Promote use to raise awareness. Efforts to increase the use and enjoyment of
the community s water resources help to increase support for taking care of
those resources.
5. Although important, public education is only a small part of solving water
quality problems. Fundamental alterations in drainage patterns and land
use in Eagan require technical solutions to be combined with public
education to achieve positive and effective results.
J City of Eagan xi
ext Quality Management Plan —Agency Review Dmft Projed 49-a5-132
Target audiences for the education program are:
■ City Staff. It is essential for the success of the program that City staff set
a good example to the community's residents, businesses, and customers
in carrying out their duties in a way that protects the City's water
resources consistent with the WQMP.
■ City Residents. The goal is that city residents be well educated about,
actively involved in, and regularly supportive of WQW policies and
programs.
■ The Development Community. It is important that City developers are
knowledgeable about and willingly partners with the City on WQMP
policies and programs.
Monitoring
To manage Eagan's lakes effectively, the City needs to know the quality of lakes relative
to their intended uses or criteria. Furthermore, actions the City takes to restore the
quality of lakes that do not meet intended uses or criteria need to be based on a practical
understanding of how watershed inputs and in -lake processes affect those lakes.
Eagan's monitoring program will focus predominantly—though not exclusively—on
collecting water quality data from priority lakes. The primary efforts will fall into one of
the three categories:
■ In -Lake monitoring. This is generally carried out by City staff during the
summer recreation season to track conditions in priority lakes.
■ Volunteer water clarity monitoring. Coordinated by City staff, this program
involves City residents in collecting data on lake water clarity and the
condition of a lake for recreational use.
■ Comprehensive monitoring for lake management plans. This effort, which
involves more detailed monitoring of in -lake conditions, also includes
looking at the characteristics of runoff discharged to the lake as well as
aquatic plant and fish communities and lake sediment characteristics.
The information generated will be the technical underpinning for
developing custom lake management plans for many of the designated
priority lakes.
#City of Eagan xii
WatnVUXUY Manog—fF -Agency R-ino Draft Pmjtt/99-05-132
Water Quality Improvement Program
The water quality improvement program in the WQMP provides an initial 5 -year
blueprint for actions or projects to carry out WQMP goals and policies. Such actions and
projects are important aspects of an upgraded "state of the art" water resources
management program because they build on Eagan's progressive leadership in
municipal water resources management.
The Improvement Program presented in the WQMP is organized into three groups of
projects:
■ General/Admnustrative;
® Lake Management, and
o Wetlands
Table 9.1 in the Plan summarizes high and medium priority water resources
management actions and projects on which the City will focus.
General/Administrative. These actions relate to development, evaluation, and revision
of ordinances and policies for land use that can have major impacts on water resources.
Examples include policies that affect the amount of impervious coverage on developed
parcels and how runoff from those impervious surfaces is handled. These improvements
also include citywide planning and study efforts that are required by other authorities,
such as the nondegradation provisions of the NPDES MS4 permit. ,
Lake Management. This WQMP identifies lake management plans as the best approach
to managing water quality in priority lakes. Lake management plans are detailed
feasibility studies for specific lakes that will evaluate the costs and benefits of
management alternatives and then provide specific costs and design guidance for
recommended capital improvements as well as non-structural management activities.
As part of implementing the overall lake management plans, the City will need to carry
out the capital improvement elements of those plans.
Management plans for eight priority lakes are programmed to be completed during the
2007-2011 time period. As the City completes successive plans, it will spend decreasing
amounts of time and effort developing plans and increasing levels of time and effort
implementing recommended measures in the plans. To reflect its future directions, the
City will update the 5 -year water quality improvement program each year.
f City'Eagan xiii
ate ityMnmgement Plan—Agency Review Draft Project 49-05-332
Within the scope of this WQMP, however, it is not possible to determine with certainty
the City's annual costs for this program. To a large extent, annual costs depend on
whether lake management plans are completed sooner or later than the programmed
schedule. Furthermore, until lake management plans are completed, the required time
and effort to implement each one remains unknown. Changes by the MnPCA in
designations to the Impaired Waters list could alter the priorities reflected in Table 9.1.
Thus, the City will evaluate the costs to complete the 5 -year schedule and to sustain
long-term implementation through its annual City operations budget process.
Wetlands. These activities reflect the City's intention to inventory and classify
wetlands systematically to protect wetlands appropriately and consistently with the
WQMF as well as to identify potential wetland banking/replacement sites in Eagan.
xivC--;f—ygM=9g tPlan —AgmryRwimDrat
Projed49-05-isz
