Loading...
10/01/1992 - Advisory Parks & Recreation Commission MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF ADVISORY PARKS, RECREATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION EAGAN, MINNESOTA OCTOBER 1, 1992 A regular meeting of the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. on Thursday, October 1, 1992 with the following Commission Members present: Ted Billy, Jonathan Widem, Kevin Knight, Dan Mooradian and Lee Markell. Commission Members Erin Ipsen, Deborah Johnson and Jack Johnson were not present. Staff present included Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation; Stephen Sullivan, Landscape Arch itect/Park Planer; Dorothy Peterson Superintendentof Recreation; John VonDeLinde, Parks Superintendent; Tom Schuster, City Forester; Dave Running, Intern and Cherryl Mesko, Secretary. AGENDA Kevin Knight moved, Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the agenda as presented. MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 3, 1992 Page 5, Paragraph 7, last sentence should read, ......achieve the goals as set forth 4. Ted Billy moved, Kevin Knight seconded with all members voting in favor to accept the minutes as amended. CONSENT AGENDA After review of the park and trail dedication issues by Park Planer Stephen Sullivan and review of the water quality issues by Water Resources Coordinator Rich Brasch, Ted Billy moved, Dan Mooradian seconded the motion to make the following recommendations to the City Council. All members voted in favor. 1. Waiver of Plat - Leo Mogel. Existing residential units involved in platting are not subject to Parks or Trails Dedication. This development should be subject to a cash dedicate to meet water quality requirements. 2. Preliminary Plat - Toby Stevens. This proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. This proposal should be subject to a cash dedication to meet water quality requirements. 3. Town Ctr 70 14th Add. - Eagan Tower Office Bldg Ptnrshp. This proposal be subject to a cash parks dedication and cash trails dedication. This proposal should be subject to a cash dedication to meet water quality requirements. That portion of the proposed development contained within Lot 1, Block 1 should be subject to a cash dedication requirement to meet water quality standards. The cash dedication associated with Outlot A will be charged when it is replatted for development at a future date. In addition, filling or draining of the existing wetland on-site should be exempt from regulation under the Wetlands Conservation Act. 4. Town Ctr 100 11th Add. - Eagan Heights Commercial. This parcel is responsible for the construction of a 6 foot wide concrete sidewalk along O'Leary Lane. This parcel shall meet its water quality treatment requirement by payment of a cash dedication for the .57 acre parcel designated as Lot 1,Block 1. Outlot A will be charged when it is replatted for future development at a later date. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 2 WENZEL ADDITION - WENSMANN REALTY Parks Planner Sullivan introduced this item reminding the Commission that they had reviewed this parcel as a component of a Park Service Area X21 study and had also reviewed a site plan at the September 3,1992 meeting. At the September meeting it was noted that the developer was proposing significant site plan changes to those previously submitted and it was agreed that the revised site plan would be brought before the Commission at the October 1 meeting. Three recommendations the Commission made in September included the developer providing a revised site plan showing the preservation of the oak stand at the northwest edge of the pond, the provision for required recreational open space and the potential for providing a trail encircling the pond. Steve continued that new revisions to the development were brought to the attention of Parks and Recreation staff at 4 p.. m. today (October 1). One of the major changes proposed is the downzoning from 161 to 126 units consisting of single family, quads and townhomes. The new site plan shows single family lots on the north and northwest side of the pond, quads on the west side and townhomes on the southeast side of the site. The pond is located south and east of the single family lots. Steve noted that this site plan shows that oaks at the northwest edge of the pond will be saved as the Commission had requested. Steve noted that the recommendations being made are based on the premise that staff will have the opportunity of reviewing this plat during the platting and grading phase. Mr. Sullivan added that the Commission reviewed the parks dedication for this park service area previously and had determined that it would be appropriate to wait until it has been determined what will be developed on the Bieter property west of this site. The development of that site will determine if parkland is needed to service this PSA and, if so, what size it will need to be. Regarding the pedestrian circulation to the school the developer is providing a 25 foot easement within the northeast corridor. Steve suggested the City install the trail but that it be benched in by the developer. Steve continued that the woodland resources circling the pond, on the north property line and in the southeast corner of the site will all be preserved. The issue of open recreational space changes due to the downsizing of the development. The idea of a common space or open play area is one that the developer has indicated he will comply with. Again, this is an issue that can be addressed once more information is made available to staff. Water Resources Coordinator Brasch reviewed the water quality issues for this site noting that this development lies in drainage basin B, a short distance up drainage from Blackhawk Lake. Runoff from the proposed development will eventually reach Blackhawk Lake and, if not treated, would degrade it's quality. Pond BP-4, which is contained on this site, had changes made to reduce nutrient loading associated with storm water runoff to Heine Pond. In 1979 an outlet was installed at an elevation that caused water to back up far into the relative flat inlet pipe between BP-4 and Heine Pond contributing to excessive nutrient loading and water quality degradation in Heine Pond. After review by the City's engineering consultant and City staff the best option appears to be to lower the elevation of the control structure in Pond BP-4 and drop the normal water elevation by about 3.2 feet in BP-4. The cost for this change is anticipated at approximately $30,000 with an annual operating cost of approximately $3-4,000. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 3 Mr. Brasch continued that the larger issue appears to be the wetland impact on this site. There are three wetlands which encompass a total of about 4.72 acres. The largest is a Type 5 open water wetland with a Type 1 bottomland wooded fringe and is associated with Pond BP-4 with a size of approximately 4.45 acres in surface area and is in a significantly degraded condition. The second wetland is a .02 acre Type 2 wet meadow near the northeastern edge of the first wetland. The third wetland is in the north central portion of the site, northwest of the Deerwood Elementary parking lot that encompasses approximately .25 acres of Type 1 bottomland forest and is severely impacted by the school. Rich continued that staff has recommended that Pond BP-4 be excavated to create an additional 2.4 acre-feet of storage. This excavation plan would need to be approved by City Staff. Staff is also recommending approval of the proposed wetland replacement plan, contingent on submission of a final wetlands impact and mitigation report and compliance with the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. Mr. Rob Bater of Westwood Professional Services addressed the Commission noting that the wetlands have been staked in the field. Lee Markell noted that limits are placed on the developer not to infringe into the wetland but wondered if the same type of limitations existed for homeowners. Mr. Bater responded that perhaps restrictive covenants could be established restricting building pads within the wetland area. Another suggestion was to place monuments to identify the limits of a building pad so as not to disrupt the wetland. Mr. Wensmann noted that this would be acceptable to him. Lee Markell asked if there could be an easement around the pond to provide for a trail. Mr. Wensmann explained that that area was anticipated to be common area but questioned the appropriateness of having a trail along the back lots of the single family homes and he wasn't quite sure how title would be handled if this option was pursued. Steve Sullivan explained some of the options may be showing this as an outlot, by providing an easement or have this part of the property as association owned. Mr. Wensmann continued that he was supportive of providing a trail along a portion of the pond, however, he was apprehensive of placing the trail along the back lots of the single family lots. Mr. Wensmann also shared his concern for the maintenance of this trail. Lee Markell explained that the trail around the pond would be an excellent amenity for the neighborhood and asked that this issue be considered. He also commended Mr. Wensmann for the change made in the downzoning of this site. In response to a question regarding timing for development, Mr. Wensmann stated that it appears marketing won't begin until January, 1993 with construction beginning some time in the spring of 1993. Mr. Markell stated that he finds it difficult to respond to this development until he has an opportunity to see the grading and landscaping plan to better determine what the actual development will look like and what it's impact will be on park needs and water quality. Lee suggested that no decisions be made until the Commission have an opportunity to better review the changes that have only recently come to the attention of Parks and Recreation staff. Mr. Wensmann indicated his understanding of the Commission's need to review the changes being proposed. He did ask for direction regarding trail access to the school noting that in a review of this development with Planning staff it had been recommended that there be two access trails provided from the development to the school. Steve Sullivan responded that staff would review this issue with Planning. Lee Markell noted that wetland replacement was not cheap and asked if the developer had looked at retaining walls as an option. Mr. Barter explained that in a previous plat retaining walls were shown and there is a possibility of bringing that option back into the current proposal. Kevin Knight asked if there would be any value in asking the developer to provide a site by site plan to provide for tree preservation. Steve Sullivan explained that there is always a benefit to providing lot specific information and that could be looked at once the grading plan is done. Mr. Wensmann indicated his approval of providing lot specific information if the Commission so desires. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 4 After further discussion, Lee Markell moved, Ted Billy seconded with all members voting in favor to table this issue until the Commission sees a rough grading plan and a woodland resource preservation plan. WEST PUBLISHING 6TH ADDITION - WEST PUBLISHING Stephen Sullivan introduced this item noting that separate applications had been submitted requesting the rezoning of approximately 2.2 acres from Light Industrial to Planned Development and a preliminary platting of 4.7 acres. Steve continued that the preliminary plat incorporates a 2.2 acre Lembke 1st Addition parcel with an existing 2.5 acre parcel which is within West Publishing Planned Development. It was noted that the site is currently being graded for a future office/warehouse. Mr. Sullivan concluded that the Commission would need to review and make recommendations regarding parks and trails dedication obligations along with reviewing the impact to the woodland resource. Steve added that the 2.5 acre parcel within the West Publishing Planned Development has fulfilled its parks dedication but the 2.2 Lembke parcel is obligated to a cash parks dedication. Both sites have been assessed for the existing trail along Wescott Road and are not obligated to a cash trails dedication. Water Resources Coordinator Brasch explained that this light industrial development consists of future offices and a warehouse on 4.7 acres located in the southeast one quarter of Section 13 on Wescott Road. Rich continued that the development is located on drainage basin G with run-off from the site eventually reaching Bur Oak Pond (Class II indirect contact recreation water body) after traveling along several intervening storm water basins. Rich noted that Bur Oak Pond is the highest valued lake in the drainage. Mr. Brasch continued that the developer has expressed a desire to meet the site's water quality requirement by excavating in Pond GP-4 to create sufficient wet pond volume to meet treatment standards for the development. Pond GP-4 is 1.3 acres in area and is currently a dry extended detention basin located just east of the proposed plat on property owned by West Publishing. Based on an impervious coverage figure of 75% for the site, Rich explained that a wet pond with approximately 1 acre-foot in volume and a minimum depth of 3 feet would be necessary to meet these treatment requirements. The developer has indicated that this site will contain no impervious area in the immediate future and is requesting that the plat approval be conditioned to allow a reconsideration of wet pond size requirements when a building permit is requested to authorize those improvements. Rich explained that the wet volume of the pond would then be revised to reflect the actual impervious coverage of the site and the pond constructed when improvements are made to the site. The land will still be zoned to allow light industrial use and will likely be used for an office and/or warehouse complex and possibly loading/parking facilities at some time in the future. Mr. Steve Bryant addressed the Commission stating that he had met with staff and concurs with their recommendations regarding this proposed development. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved, Kevin Knight seconded with all members voting in favor to make the following recommendations to the City Council regarding West Publishing 6th Addition: 1. That the 2.2 acre Lembke 1st Addition parcel be subject to a cash parks dedication. 2. That the developer meet water quality requirements for the proposed development by creating wet volume in Pond GP-4. The wet pond will be 1 acre-foot in volume and a minimum of 3 feet in average depth. These figures should be reviewed and revised based on actual impervious figures for the site at the time any building permit is issued for the site. Excavation of the pond must be completed prior to construction of any impervious surfaces on the site. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 5 UPDATE ON OAK WILT WORKSHOP Director Vraa introduced this item and asked Commission Members if they had any questions from the special workshop held on September 17th. If there were no questions Mr. Vraa asked if the Commission would like to pursue a joint meeting with the City Council to further evaluate the situation and look at steps that could be made in implementing a program of oak wilt suppression and abatement within the City. Kevin Knight thanked staff for the follow-up memo and indicated it very clearly reviewed the issues discussed and recommended that the next step would be to set up a joint meeting with the City Council. Mr. Billy concurred with Mr. Knight's suggestion and noted his concern with the magnitude of the problem and felt this issue should be addressed as soon as possible. He suggested that by hiring a part-time tree inspector in 1993 and conducting an aerial survey to better understand the location and extent of oak wilt disease the City will be better prepared to identify specific areas where suppression and abatement can occur. Lee Markell agreed with the importance of aerial photography showing the hot spots of the disease but suggested that this be done on an annual basis. Dan Mooradian suggested that by hiring a part-time tree inspector in 1993 this may be beneficial in obtaining grant dollars in subsequent years. John VonDeLinde added that it may be possible to fund the part-time position by the City in 1993 with the anticipation that state grant dollars may be available in 1994. Mr. Vraa indicated that he would contact City Administrator Hedges and attempt to set up a joint workshop with the City Council to review this issue. POND JP-69 - STORM WATER RETENTION - DIFFLEY/DANIEL PARCEL Director Vraa introduced this item and reviewed the background for the Commission. He noted that this parcel of land was acquired by the City as part of the HUD acquisition when the city needed to acquire the Lexington/Diffley land parcel. HUD required that the city also acquire this particular parcel in addition to Lexington/Diffley site, as one purchase. With development of the property west of Daniel drive now underway, storm water will be directed towards this parcel. Storm sewer and pending easement had already been obtained by the city prior to its acquisition, but no final design was completed for the ponding area. Ken continued that with the plans completed for County Road 30 and its impact on this land, staff has now begun the process of designing the pond limits for storm water on this parcel. It was also noted that when this parcel was acquired it was the intention of the City Council to downzone it to single family so that the property could be re-sold to recoup the investment made in the parcel. Mr. Vraa outlined four criteria that staff felt were important during this design portion which included retaining as many trees as reasonably possible along the east property, providing the necessary volumetric water retention and improve water quality, preservation of trees on the entire parcel and, finally, configuration for eventual resale of the property for lot development to re-capture the investment. Ken noted that this issue was being brought before the Commission to make them familiar with the project and to solicit additional information/concerns from them. In response to a question from Mr. Billy, Mr. Vraa responded that there are 8 lots on the site that front on Daniel Drive. The City paid $18-19,000 per acre plus assessments for this land and would be looking at selling for approximately $20-27,000 per acre. Mr. Vraa noted that adjacent homeowners have shown an interest in acquiring some of the property primarily for the purpose of tree preservation. Ken continued that although the sale of the property to the neighbors could be done, it may be difficult. The sale of the property may have an injurious effect on the eventual development and platting of the property for residential development. Mr. Vraa also indicated that after visiting the site it is clear that some of the homes have encroached into this parcel with the development of their back yards and garden. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 6 Ted Billy asked if the parcel of land needed to be sold at all; he suggested leaving the property as parkland indicating it would be a nice amenity to the neighborhood. Mr. Vraa responded that using this property as parkland would be very limited based on the size of the pond on the site. Mr. Billy suggested leaving the area natural as it is now and if, at a later date, there is a need to develop this parcel for park use then it can be done. Jim Johnson, representing City Engineering Consultant OSM, reviewed the site as it pertains to the design of the storm water pond. He reviewed the treed areas noting which areas will be left as shown, i.e. the softwoods area that backs up to Northview Meadows 2nd Addition and the mature oaks to the north and west of the site. Jim continued that the normal water elevation is calculated at 946 with the high water level calculated at 952. He also noted that 250 cu.ft./second would drain into the pond during a 100 year storm. Kevin Knight asked if building pads were placed on these lots under this proposal, would the trees need to be removed. It was noted that most likely the trees would need to be removed in order to develop the 8 lots. There was discussion regarding a trail around the pond and Mr. Vraa noted that a trail could be placed at the higher elevation near the top of the lots, however it would not be a pleasurable walk on the east side of the pond since the trail would be too near the pond. Mr. Knight asked where the nearest park was to this neighborhood. Mr. Vraa responded that Northview Elementary School was the closest but the nearest neighborhood park would be Walnut Hill and Trapp Farm Park, the closest community park. Mr. Billy commented that there appeared to be few places for children to go and play and reiterated his preference for leaving the property as is. Homeowner of Lot 3, Northview Meadows 2nd Addition addressed the Commission explaining his initial intent was to purchase a portion of the land the City owns in order to preserve trees. He commented that he was pleased to see that tree preservation was such a big consideration for this project and he liked the idea of the ponding area being increased. The consensus of the neighborhood seems to be that they would like to see the property remain as it is and perhaps at a later time add a few amenities for the children in the neighborhood. He commented that there is no play area close to this neighborhood and is concerned because there is no trail or sidewalk that can safely carry children to the nearby parks. Homeowner of Lot 2, Northview Meadows 2nd Addition added that he wanted to see the property left as it is and would prefer that the lots not be developed. His preference was to preserve the wooded areas and have no bike trail or sidewalk. Jonathan Widem asked what the intent was for this property at the time it was acquired by the City. Mr. Vraa responded that because the land purchase was required as part of the acquisition of the Lexington/Diff ley site it has always been the City Council's intention to sell the land to recoup some of the costs expended for it's purchase. The question for the Commission, Mr. Vraa continued, seems to be whether or not they would spend $140,000 to acquire this property as a park site today. Mr. Billy reiterated his position that the property be kept as is and if there is a need to sell at a later date then that option should be considered. He felt that selling the lots now and running into a possible use for this property at a later date would be short-sighted. Mr. Knight suggested looking at potential public use along with developing the site. He wanted to see more information regarding these options before recommending any options. Dan Mooradian identified three separate issues for consideration. Looking at a trail on the northern wooded area, saving the trees behind Lots 1 and 2 and the possibility of excluding the development of the land that abuts Lots 1 and 2. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 7 The residents present thanked the Commission for hearing their opinions and concerns and expressed their appreciation for their input. Lee Markell thanked the neighbors for their input as well as their interest in this project. LAND USE REQUEST - LEXINGTON/DIFFLEY SITE Director Vraa introduced this item as a request to allow the use of the Lexington/Diffley park land parcel for a golf driving range for a period of 3 to 5 years. Ken continued that Mike King, owner and operator of the Tee Time Golf Driving Range east of Lexington Avenue, is requesting that the City consider a portion of the Lexington/Diffley site to be used for a golf driving range. The area Mr. King is targeting is south of the water reservoir and west of the old gravel road previously known as Lexington Avenue. Ken continued that the driving range would be approximately 300 yards long and approximately 350 feet wide at the tee area. In addition there would be a small building to accommodate equipment as well as a miniature golf area. It was noted that the timeline for development of the site as an athletic facility is undetermined at this time, however in conjunction with the construction of County Road 30, Commission and Council has previously given approval for potential development of all or a portion of the site to be used as a "balance" area for County Road 30. It is estimated that thq construction of County Road 30 will require approximately 80,000 cu. yds of common borrow and soil borings have indicated that the Lexington/Diffley site has an enormous amount of granular material which is ideal for roadway construction. Another concern expressed to Mr. King is an access to the site considering County Road 30 will be under construction in 1993. Another issue Mr. Vraa reminded the Commission to consider is that Mr. King has asked for a five year lease period but would be willing to consider three years. Mike King addressed the Commission providing them some further background along with a presentation of how a golf driving range could be facilitated on the Lexington/Diffley site. Mr. King continued that his preference would be to have a five to seven year lease so that the lease time will cover the costs of development. He added that it was important to him that if the Commission and Council gave permission for the golf range to be facilitated on this site that he provide a good working relationship with the City in anticipation that this would be a positive experience for everyone. Ted Billy asked if soil would be removed from the entire site during the upgrading of Diffley Road by the County. Mr. Vraa responded that the developer typically likes to use an area as small as possible when doing this type of excavation. Lee MarkelI suggested that this would be a good area to incorporate and make visible the water quality efforts the City has been implementing. Lee continued that it would be nice if the site could be graded in exchange for fill needed by the County and if there is an opportunity for the driving range to fit within these parameters he would be supportive. Mr. Billy noting the crunch the City is experiencing for athletic facilities expressed his concern for the site being tied up for 5-7 years. He suggested that the Commission stay focused on facilitating the need for athletic facilities first before looking at expanding to a new venture. Dan Mooradian asked if it would be incompatible to have a driving range developed at this site before softball fields are in. If it is not compatible with the City's proposed use of this site, or if it is not feasible for the driving range to remain for a period of time to make Mr. King's investment worthwhile then it should not be considered for development at this time. Mr. Vraa responded that a five-year lease would be difficult to speculate about since the timing for the balance of the site is currently unknown because of the funds necessary for development. Mr. King added that he has been negotiating with another landowner regarding the feasibility of locating the driving range on another site. He reiterated his interest in remaining within Eagan and would hope the Commission would recommend pursuing this issue further so that a driving range could be made available to residents. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1,1992 Page 8 After further discussion Lee Markel) moved that staff work with Mr. King to see if a golf driving range could be a viable option on the Lexington/Diffley site as part of the Master Plan. Kevin Knight amended the motion to include the first priority of the site to be the development of an athletic facility as soon as possible; that staff work with the County to see if the grading can be accomplished as part of the Diffley Road upgrade; that there be a clear understanding with Mr. King that staff will try to work with him to see if a driving range is a viable option and if it is, the lease for such a facility would be limited to a maximum of 3 years with the understanding that the lease may be terminated sooner if dollars are available for the development of the site and that Mr. King assume the financial risk for this venture if it is approved. Dan Mooradian seconded the motion with all members voting in favor. Mr. King responded that a three year lease would not be long enough but if the Commission would consider a longer lease there may be the option of turning the equipment over to the City once the five year period has passed. Mr. King reiterated that a lease less than five years would not be realistic in order to recover his costs of development and operation. Mr. King thanked the Commission for their consideration and stated his interest in continuing to work with Mr. Vraa and staff to see if some options may still be available since he did not want to close the doors on this idea. CAPITAL FUNDS SOURCE COMPARISON SURVEY - DAVE RUNNING Superintendent of Recreation Peterson introduced Dave Running who has been an intern in the Parks and Recreation Department for the past 12 weeks. She explained that at the end of their internship with the City, students are required to prepare a report and present it to the Advisory Commission. Mr. Running has done his research on parks and recreation departments capital expenditures during the last three years. Dave Running explained that the study he researched was in response to interest expressed in finding out where other parks and recreation departments are receiving their capital outlay money in an effort to generate new ideas on gaining new funds in the future. Dave continued that he collected data from 10 parks and recreation departments in the Twin Cities area; first through a cover letter and followed by an interview with the 10 departments. Dave then reviewed the interview questions and hypothesis that were constructed to help in the research. Hypothesis # 1 was that larger parks and recreation departments, those having over 20 employees, will spend more money on capital expenditures than smaller parks and recreation department, those having less than 20 employees. Hypothesis #2 was that thirty percent f the parks and recreation departments questioned would have received a grant within the last three fiscal years. Hypothesis #3 was that fifty percent of the parks and recreation departments questioned have received parks and/or trails dedications monies from developers. Mr. Running then reviewed the statement of funds and sources noting that many of the funds sources are relatively the same but with a little difference in their name. Some of the more unique funds sources included West St. Paul who receives $85,000/year from their interest income fund, Eden Prairie is paying for a new ice arena by way of a lease/purchase program and Inver Grove Heights receives money from their Land Fill Abaitment Fund at a rate of $1.00 per dump into the local land fill. Ted Billy thanked Dave for an excellent report and commented on the value of this information forthe future. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Meeting Page 9 PARK NAMING Director Vraa introduced this item bringing the Commission's attention to the letterfrom Shawn Hunter regarding the possible naming of the Lexington/Diffley park site. Ken suggested that the Commission's Park Naming sub-committee plan to meet to recommend names for Lexington/Diffley and Manor Lake park sites. Ted Billy reminded the Commission they had agreed that all members would serve on this sub-committee and suggested that they meet prior to the November commission meeting. It was suggested that Dick Carroll be contacted to see if he would be willing to do some research into the history of these sites to help with the park naming process. Mr. Vraa indicated he would get in touch with Mr. Carroll and set a date for the park naming sub-committee. BLACKHAWK PARK UPDATE Park Planner Sullivan explained that the construction work for Blackhawk Park began on September 8 and at this time 80% of the trails and parking lot area has been cleared and grubbed. Steve added that earth moving work began on September 21 with staff doing the construction staking and inspections. It is hoped that the preliminary work will be completed this fall. PHASE II - SCHWANZ LAKE GRANT PROPOSAL/FISH LAKE GRANT PROPOSALS Water Resources Coordinator Brasch introduced this item as grant proposals for submission to the Pollution Control Agency's Clean Water Partnership Program. The deadline for the grant submission is October 29, 1992 and a recommendation by the Commission is being sought before proceeding for approval by the City Council. The first grant is for the implementation phase of the Schwanz Lake project in which staff has reviewed with the Commission the diagnostic/ feasibility and implementation plan components (Phase I). Rich continued that an Executive Summary for Phase 1 and a budget summary for Phase 2 are attached. The PCA has not completed its technical review of the project report, but periodic communication with the reviewers indicates no major problems at this time. The funding for the Schwanz Lake project will be a combination of grant, in-kind, and local cash. The dollars anticipated from MPCA would be $139,018. The second grant application is for a Phase 1 assessment of Fish Lake that will involve a modification of last year's application for Fish and Blackhawk Lakes. Mr. Brasch stated that the study will begin this fall and if the City if fortunate enough to receive the grant for studies that will be a plus; if not, staff will proceed to the Phase II, 1994 implementation. It is anticipated that the total project costs will be $96,500. After further discussion, Ted Billy moved, Dan Mooradian seconded with all members voting in favor to recommend the approval of Clean Water Partnership Grant Applications for Schwanz Lake and Fish Lake. WETLANDS TASK FORCE MEETING Mr. Brasch reviewed the summary of the Wetlands Task Force Meeting held on September 23 highlighting the main points of the presentation by Paul Krauss on Chanhassen's wetlands protection efforts. Rich also reviewed the results of the meeting and the input by Commission members present. Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resources Commission Minutes of October 1, 1992 Page 10 DEPARTMENT HAPPENINGS - PARKS MAINTENANCE/RECREATION UPDATE Recreation Happenings were incorporated in a video presentation which was shared with the Commission outlining some of the activities at various parks as well as recreation highlights. Superintendent of Parks VonDeLinde reviewed some of the work projects completed and procedures underway by the maintenance staff including Northview tennis courts, Captain Dodd playground construction, Rahn athletic dugouts, monthly playground inspections, aerification of parks and repair of a watermain break on the south side of Northview soccer fields. John also commented on the busy September for the Forestry Division with the replacement of trees and replacement of wood mulch in various parks. Superintendent of Recreation Peterson reviewed the active use of Northview soccer fields with the extensive use by Dakota Middle School and EAA; the extensive use of Northview tennis courts by both Dakota Hills Middle and Eagan High Schools; adult volleyball, football and fall softball; introduction of in-line skating and a visit to the Tiny Tots program. ROUND TABLE Kevin Knight asked if a date could be set to begin the review process for the Parks Master Plan. After checking schedules, October 28, 5:30 p.m. at the Central Maintenance Facility was determined to be the meeting date and time. A notice will be sent to all members prior to the meeting and the length of the meeting will be planned for 1.5 - 2 hours. With no further business to conduct, Lee Markell moved, Jonathan Widem seconded with all members voting in favor to adjourn the meeting. The meeting was adjourned at 11:00 p.m. 4 Secretary Date