The URL can be used to link to this page

05/01/2001 - City Council Regular AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING MAY 1, 2001 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE H. ADOPT AGENDA 111. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS IV. CONSENT AGENDA A. APPROVE MINUTES M ~ZB. PERSONNEL ITEMS ~APPROVE Proclamation for Pause For The Pledge Of Allegiance on Flag Day, June 14, 2001 a D. APPROVE Proclamation Naming May 3, 2001 Space Day E. APPROVE City Auction of Surplus Items on May 19, 2001 F. APPROVE Lease Agreement for Gopher Resource Corporation for Outlot 1, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2°d Addition 6G . DIRECT Staff to Prepare Ordinance for Administrating Civil Penalties for Liquor License Violations g H. APPOINT Hearing Officer to Conduct Hearing Regarding Violation - Caspers I. ACCEPT Minnesota State Arts Board Grant y~ J. APPROVE Final Subdivision - Oakbrooke 5 h Addition - Pulte Homes K. APPROVE Final Subdivision and Final Planned Development - Woodstone Townhomes L. RECEIVE Bids / Award Contract - Contract 01-02 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Street Improvements) M. RECEIVE Final Assessment Roll, Authorize Public Hearing - Project 761 (Duckwood Drive- Street and Utility Improvements) N. APPROVE Traffic Signal Agreement with Dakota County - Project 771 (Lexington Avenue - Street and Utility Improvements) -ilk 0. AUTHORIZE Final Payment - Contract 00-09D (Reroofing - North Water Treatment Plant) 1~ P. APPROVE "No Parking" Resolution - Project 790R (Central Parkway - Street and Utility Improvements) Q. APPROVE Changes in Various Municipal State Aid Street Designations R. APPROVE Right of way Acquisition Agreement, Project 768 (Northwood Parkway) pq5 P5a S. APPROVE Private Well Installation - Gopher Resources (3385 Hwy 149) V. 6:30 - PUBLIC HEARINGS p SU 1 A. ASSESSMENT Roll of Delinquent False Alarm Billings 5 B. ASSESSMENT Roll of Delinquent Utility Billings C.. ASSESSMENT Roll of Delinquent Weed Cutting Billings D. PROJECT 764, Selmark/HarveyBurrview Acres Additions (Street Improvements) VIE E. PROJECT 806, Kennerick Addition, Pond HDP-1 (Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet) VACATION - Public Drainage & Utility Easement (Lot 3, Block 1, Unisys Park Addition (Northwest Airlines) vG. VARIANCE - Duke-Weeks - A variance to the required 25% green space area and a Variance to the required 5 foot pavement setback to allow a shared driveway for Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, Eagan Point, located on the west side of Hwy. 149 across from Rolling Hills Drive in the SW '/a of Section 12. VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS f151 A. APPOINTMENT to Waste Management Commission i JO 15 16' B. CONDITONAL USE PERMIT - Kathleen Cooley. A conditional use permit to allow an accessory structure that would result in total accessory structure area on the site in excess of 1100 square feet, on property located at 4395 Dodd Road in the NW '/a of Section 25. p • ~I 3 C. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT to consider a Special Area designation in I southeast Eagan located south of Red Pine Lane on either side of Trunk Highway 3. P. Iii 8 D. REQUEST for Code Amendment - Adams Outdoor Advertising VIII. LEGISLATIVEANTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA A. Comments by City Council, City Administrator, and Department Heads B. Storm Update C. Central Park Update / Community Center Project X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT XII. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY XIII. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. y-` MEMO city of eagan MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: APRIL 27, 2001 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR MAY 1, 2001 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA After approval is given to the May 1, 2001 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. I e Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the minutes of the April 17, 2001 regular City Council meeting, the April 17, 2001 Listening Session and the April 3, 2001 Listening Session as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes of the April 17, 2001 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages .3 through • Minutes of the April 17, 2001 Listening Session are enclosed on page /0_. • Minutes of the April 3, 2001 Listening Session are enclosed on page. MINUTES Ol ~ REGULAR MEE7TIFG OF THE Et}ONN CITY COUNT-U,.; anM.innesotgi- A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, April 17, 2001 at 6:30 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Bakken, Carlson, Fields and Tilley. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney Mike Dougherty-. AqF Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmen illey seted a motion to approve the agenda. Aye: Nav: 0 • . RECOGNITITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Award Acknowledgement and Arbor Day Resolution, May 5, 2001 City Administrator Hedges discuss;~j; h,e 2000 Tree City USA award and Growth Award from the National Arbor Day Foundation. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilitx►ember T l ei~.S onded a motion to acknowledge Eagan as the recipient of the 2000 Tree City USA Award and 6ivth AA;ald fwgiAe National Arbor Day Foundation, and approve the Arbor Day Resolution setting SaturdX.ri;5427 sirbor Day and May. 2001 as Arbor Month in the Cite of Eagan. Aye: Nay: 0 CONSENT AGENDA Mayor Awada noted that an amendment to the April 3, 2001 minutes had been submitted prior to the meeting. A. Minutes. 1. It was recommended to apprdi%E'fi•7itiiHiitC6ofSf~it3, 2001 Regular City Council meeting as amended: minutes of the February 26, 209:1. February;19 2001, February 12; 2001, Februan' 7, 2001. January 22, 2001 and January 8, 2001 Sp~ial City C..Omcil meetings as presented. B. Personnel Items: 1. It was recommended to approve the hirM:14 Dian4:6rdell, Michelle Wick, Megan Bergen. Amber Paukner, Matthew Gilbert, Amy Jo Ellis, Matthewii}fr, Kelsey Crunstedt and Lisa Bordsen as part- time seasonal lifeguards for Cascade Bay. 2. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Melissa Smith as a part-time seasonal guest services sub-team leader for Cascade Bay. 3. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Sara 4,pc cey, Angela Losso, Nicholas Johnson, Luke Selby, Amy Osborne, Tom Wollan and Steven Sar s part-time seasonal guest services workers for Cascade Bay. 4. It was recommended to apRrt '}Jiga D~`3 ilyponson, Maridvth Lewis, Teresa Sperl, Colin Foley, John Foley, Cassy Le$i'it}fi:itr$sgv~ltt•part-time seasonal concessions workers for Cascade Bav. 5. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Mao Werhaus as a part-time seasonal operations end maintenance worker for Cascade Bay. 6. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Ryan Stanton, Megan McMahon, Julie Wavrunek, Joel Wavrunek, Erin Severson, Michael Mason, Meghan Doherty, Christopher Buntjer, Deborah Buntjer, Andrew Thill, Jasmine Abdullah, Erik Johnson, Jessica Sjoberg and Rachel Nygaard as part-time seasonal concessions workers. 7. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Christopher Pittelkow. Tom Irvin and Adam Fechner as seasonal ballfield attendants. 8. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Kay Ruth Martin as a seasonal park attendant. 3 Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes April 17, 2001 Page 2 9. It was recommended to approve the eetQg`1pf'l:Iie Construction Supervisor position (Exempt Range K, Step 6) to Construction Manager (1~Yempt Range L, Step 5). 10. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Jake Loesch as a part-time seasonal park maintenance worker. 11. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Delbert Keene as a seasonal park laborer. 12. It was recommended to approve;itiTc4S;~s a part-time seasonal ice skating instructor for the Civic Arena. 13. It was recommended to approve the hiringisa Drat; a temporary clerical worker for Community Development. r::~, 14. It was recommended to approve the hi 'rMenry C*:; hd Timothy Snetting as Community Service Officers for the Police lo r; coii; titon successful completion of a physical examination, including drug testing. C. New Licenses and License Renewals. It was recommended to approve new Commercial Fertilizer Licenses for Outdoor Environments, Inc. and Total Law Care Mtn.; Tree Contractor License renewals for Henning Rohde and Tall Timbers; a Tobacco License (new owner and name change) for First Tobacco Etc.; and a renewal for a Commercial Fertilizer License for Fertilawn and Minnesota Turf Care. D. Lawful Gambling Premises Permit-::1vK;as recommended to approve a Lawful Gambling Premises Permit for Burnsville Rotary Club. E. Temporary Malt Liquor License. It was'fC'f`oi u C 1; to, approve a Temporary Malt Liquor License for Eagan Lions Club for July 4, 2001. F. Final Subdivision. It was recommended; approv e.aF?*af.$ bdivision for Crane Creek - Wensmann Realty. G. Findings of Fact. It was recomme( totiiti Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Resolution of Denial of the request of Sowles Propertie3;'td for a Conditional Use Permit for outside storage and a setback Variance on 3.9 acres of land located at 3131 Sibley Memorial Highway, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park. H. Project 776R. It was recommended to receive the draft Feasibility Study for Project 776R (Yankee Doodle Road Extension - Street, Utility and Trail Improvements), and schedule a public hearing to be held on May 15, 2001. 1. Contract 01-01. It was recommA&a-46-i~eoi i4ik*:Ji ~{s 1cj Contract 01-01, (Canterbury Forest, Wedge%vood, Letendre Additions - Street Repr(acing/(heeKJay), award the contract to Northwest Asphalt. Inc., for the base bid in the amount of $348,1M and autwze the Mayor and Deputy Clerk to execute all related documents. J. Contract 01-04. It was recommended to aplli'Qiae the pla ~Dr Contract 01-04 (Central Parkway / Central Park Site - Street, Utilities and Grading Improvements) Wlia authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday. June 28, 2001. K. Eagan Healthy Community Initiative. It was recommended to approve funding of $1,000 to Eagan Healthy Community Initiative's New Resident Open House. L. Erosion and Sediment Control Policy. It was recomr=44e4 adopt unanimous Advisory Parks Commission recommendation to implement the Erosiob ltd Sedimentation Control Policy and authorize staff to prepare appropriate ordinagge 14Wage to conf~rift'to the policy. M. National Day of Prayer. It was rec~tit?i?i { eck 14itt}May 3, 2001 as National Day of Prayer. N. Project 771. It was recommend4'f6'if%01? t&-A*: ttgdQi i 'Construction, and Right of Way Agreement for Project 771 (Lexington Avenue, Town Centre Drive to ;Qbabview Drive - Street, Utility and Trail Improvements) with the Dakota County Highway Delient and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. 0. Part 150 Program. It was recommended to adopt the resolution reaffirming the City's support of expansion of the MAC sound insulation program to the DNL 60-64 area. P. Cedar Pond Best Management Practices Project. It was recommended to accept a Minnesota DNR Aquatic Plant Management Program grant and officially designate the Cedar Pond Best Management Practices (BMP) Project as a Water Resources Demonstration Project. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes " April 17, 2001 Page 3 Councilmember Bakken moved, CounciTftr{Zji8inded a motion to approve the consent agenda. Ave: 5 Nav: 0 ' Mayor Awada adjourned the City Council meeting at 6:44 p.m. to a meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority. Mayor Awada reconvened the regult'flq'fiiiyp};steeiigOApri1 17, 2001 at 6:50 p.m. , ,ARINGS PUBLIC . MODIFICATIONS TO NORTHEAST EA":4PW-W DISTRICT NO. 2, TAX INCREMENT FI1Ai`Q>~ DIS7'1i# X10. 3 Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to continue the public hearing regarding modifications to Northeast Eagan Development District No. 2, Tax Increment Finance District No. 3 to a future City Council meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 VARIANCE TAMARA BOSIACKI City Administrator Hedges introduced tl.. ' re'g~ a Variance request to exceed the 20 percent lot coverage allowed in a residential district on Lot 3 lock axi Pointe 7t" Addition located at 4366 Braddock Trail. Senior Planner Ridley gave a st3 Mayor Awada opened the public l~e8rin9. There being no public comment, Mayor Awada closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. " Councilmember Bakken stated tly tl{iiti4%iltit kxopQed by the applicant is in keeping with the neighborhood. Councilmember Bakken moved, CouncilmeIFW4. Tilley s_gnded a motion to approve a Variance to exceed the 20 percent lot coverage allowed in a resid441 district qi Lot 3, Block 1, Lexington Point 7 h Addition located at 4366 Braddock Trail in the NE 1/a of Section t. Aye: May: 0 PROJECT 745 - CONTINUED FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING - BLUE GENTIAN ROAD (STREETS AND UTILITIES) City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regard*4he final assessment roll for Project 745 - Blue Gentian Road streets and utilities. He stated that Spectrum Dev*.b- ment is requesting a continuation of the public hearing regarding Project 745 for 30 da} ,I~1aJ 1R; V11her revie~;Ud analysis of the proposed final costs. Public Works Director Colbertgave a brief preiiit•gjecf: Mayor Awada opened the public hearing. David Salene, representing Spectrum Development discussed the request for continuation of the hearing. The Council, City Attorney and staff discussed the proposed assessment and a previous agreement between the City and Spectrum Development. Greg Miller, Interstate Partners, requested that the Council deny the request to continue the public hearing. Mayor Awada stated that an agreement had been negotiated with all parties and she felt the request b}' Spectrum was not appropriate. i Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes • • • • ' • • ' April 17, 2001 Page 4 Councilmember Tilley moved, Council mdi k. W% ;::5Obnded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for Project 745 Final Assessment Heaniig'-'lfue Gentian Road Streets and Utilities and direct staff to meet with Spectrum to thoroughly explain the assessment. Ave: 5 Nay:0 PROJECT 746 - CONTINUED FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING - BLUE WATER ROAD City Administrator Hedges introduced this itert:arding t f nal assessment roll for Project 746 - Streets and Utilities - Blue Water Road. Mayor Awada opened the public heMiig i l•3i re iC ft gad ti#?lic comment, she closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. • • ' Councilmember Bakken, moved Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for Project 745 - Blue Gentian Road (streets and utilities) and Project 746 - Blue Water Road (streets and utilities) until the May 15, 2001 City Council meeting. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 754 -FINAL ASSESSM 1iNG, HILLTOP ESTATES -STREET OVERLAY City Administrator Hedges introduced thisi;tem feegai;tticig-the final assessment roll for Project 754 (Hilltop Estates -Street Overlay). Public Works kivector Colb'a brief presentation. Mayor Awada opened the public h. g? PWe' i~ ng no public continent, she closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council.:ii Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for Project 754 (Hilltop Estates - Street Overlay) and authorize its certification to Dakota Count- for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 783 - FINAL ASSESS11iI)~ Ak;?0W RNESS PARK - STREET OVERLAY Cit< Administrator Hedges introduced this it ,iegardiri: final assessment roll for Project 783 (Wilderness Park Addition - Street Overlay). Public;VS?'t}rks Dire}Qk Colbert gave a brief presentation. Mayor Awada opened the public hearing. There being 14iypublic comment, Mayor A«ada closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for Project 783 (Wilderness Park Addition - Sir "O. "erlay) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PROJECT 781, VIENNA W Oft'X. s - DITIONS - STREET OVERLAY City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regardii3&,the final assessment roll for Project 781 (Vienna Woods / Rahn Ridge Additions - Street Overlay). Put ic' Vorks Director Colbert gay a brief presentation. Mayor Awada opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, she closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Fields moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve the final assessment roll for Project 781 (Vienna Woods / Rahn Ridge Additions - Street Overlay) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. Ave: 5 Nav: 0 6 Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes • • • • • • • April 17, 2001 Page 5 PRIMARY ELECTION ORDINANCE City Administrator Hedges discussed this item regarding consideration of a repeal of the Primary Election Ordinance. y; Several residents were present and expressed t@3f bppositi(kSA repealing the primary election ordinance. After discussing the possibility of resident surveys, the cast of holding Tprimary election, and the number of voters r: who participate in a primary election, the Council agk_x • at Cour0ilgembers Tilley and Carlson would work with staff to gather information for discussio-j;t$;;Q'[►p rkiafing. Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a motion to continue discussion of the Primar_ Election Ordinance until the second meeting in June, 2001 meeting.. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 SUPER STORM EVALUATION CRITERIA FOR MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS City Administrator Hedges introd t S.{tP-regarding a policy that establishes criteria, evaluation standards and categories for reviewing the July'2EiTi2 Sr age mitigation improvements based on the conclusions of the Bonestroo Engineering report..;P.ublic V ie # tector Colbert gave an overview of the criteria and evaluation standards established by staff. Discussion was held which includcd:t of the storm drainage system. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to direct staff to establish a policy establishing the criteria, evaluation standards and categories for reviewing the July 2000 storm drainage nutigation improvements based on the conclusions of the Bonestroo Engineering report and the Finance Committee to meet regarding alternative funding. Aye: 5 Nay. 0 MORATORIUM'dim. l SOUTHEAST EAGAN City Administrator Hedges introduced this it}~egardin:t~ie adoption of an Interim Ordinance establishing a moratorium on development for the 16' els of l6i4located in the south half of Section 36 designated for further study. , Area property owners were present and expressed their concern over the lack of discussion with effected property owners regarding the intent of the City. They further stated a moratorium would limit the value of property until the moratorium is lifted and requested that the moratorium not be approved. Mayor Awada explained that due to Red Pine Lane beiA nstalled on the west side of Highway 3, a study needs to be conducted regarding future commercial needs in thecQi6a . She further explained that the Council, Advisory Planning Commission, and s:AReat~St affected property owners to work towards a long term transition. The property owne e.1 @d} itiould be *conducted as expeditiously as possible. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Fi4t~ *jeconded a motion to amend Eagan City Code Chapter Twelve by adopting Section 12.02 Entitled "Interim Ui:$tudy Area in Section 36'?. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 NEW BUSINESS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION CSM PROPERTIES, INC. City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a Planned Development Amendment to allow the construction of a 54,000 square foot office/showroom/Nvarehouse building upon a 5.0 acre site and a i Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes • April 17, 2001 , . Page 6 Preliminary Subdivision (Blue Ridge Fourth Addil~.St3dyt,tation of a two lot subdivision, located south of Lone Oak Parkway and east of TH 149. Senior Planitei' Lid 2y gave a staff report. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmember Tilley seconded a motion to approve a Planned Development Amendment to allow the construction of a 54,000 square foot office/showroom/warehouse building upon a 5.0 acre site located south of Lone Oa1f I.~49 (Dodd Road in the southwest I/ Section I subject to the following conditions: • • • • • • , , , 1. The City approve the Blue Ridge Fourth dition Fin' bdivision. 2. The applicant and/or developer shall erliot o a writfi;~lanned Development Amendment Agreement with the City. 3. The following exhibits are regfif~f0i the Pi¢;e7;iwelopment Amendment Agreement: ■ Final Site Plan ■ Final Landscape Plan ■ Final Building Elevations and Signage Plan • Lighting Plan 4. The outside storage of material:~.:pther than trash handling/recycling containers, shall be prohibited. 5. Retail sales activities shall be~.' off 6. All wall signage shall comply with ~g}lpde requirements. 7. The approval of the PD Amendment shall'noi a 1* %or in any way affect the City's right to retain any existing public easement whic e Applicagt RW..desire to have vacated in accordance with all applicable procedures. 8. Exterior building materials s}litCtibteiit'Nith surrounding structures. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Councilmember Carlson moved, rouncirmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Preliminar, Subdivision (Blue Ridge Fourth Addition) to allow the creation of a two lot subdivision on property located south of Lone Oak Parkway and east of TH 149.Q*Ad.gp ii;tL;he spwest of Section 1 subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer shall comply with these standai*$: ronditior,'is bf plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1, B4, Cl, C21 C41 dT:'J1 2. An outlot skimmer in accordance with City doijteering $tsi#dards, shall be constructed on the outlet pipe from the water quality pond to Pond CP-7. 3. The applicant shall dedicate ingress/egress easement to allow access for the proposed shared access between Lots 1 and 2. This easement shall be prepared for review and approval by the City Attorney prior to building permit approval. 4. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of the.tpink storm sewer pipe across Lot 2 in accordance with City standards. 5. The developer shall be responsible for the vacation of thd.b%sting drainage and utility easement over the trunk storm sewer pipe on Lot 2 16*00rg :tent shall be vacated prior to final subdivision approval for the -development. 6. This development shall meet the City's water quality requirements entirely through on-site ponding. 7. At the time of Lot 2 development, a stormwater pond s"be constructed with a minimum wet-pond, volume of 1.00 acres-feet and a minimum area of 0.34 413*. the stormwater treatment pond shall be constructed according to NURP standards with a minimum depth of 6 feet, 10:1 aquatic bench, and an outlet skimmer according to City design standards. 8. To minimize nearby impacts, the development shall be set back at least 30 feet from the edge of the delineated boundary of the wetland. During and after construction of the development, a minimum 30-foot wide buffer of natural undisturbed vegetation along the delineated boundary of the wetland shall be maintained. g Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes • • • • • • • ' April 17, 2001 Page 7 9. Erosion control practices shall be proper ltif'tcai#$ @ffively maintained throughout the development process to prevent and minimize soil loss and rifgfr2 impacts to down-gradient resources and water quality. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 , LEGISLATIVE/IN791t*"•,lk{1AFFAIRS UPDATE City Administrator Hedges stated that testimony had becA given at aWaring before the legislature regarding sales tax deferment for the Community Center. r =t.: AIJftN 'fkATif LNDA COMMENTS BY CITY COUNCIL, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, AND DEPARTMENT HEADS City Administrator Hedges requested consideration regarding special legislation that would allow the Cit} to consider an option to sell North Park anc}se.the proceeds for public purposes. Mayor Awada moved, Councilmembe'73akCipgded a motion to direct staff to encourage our legislative delegation to pass legislation to allow Ci{y'li~i R31;f i North Park property and use the proceeds for a public purpose. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 Margaret Schriner of the Eagan 1;;dtt4itl'afion provided an update regarding the status of the Unmet Needs Committee. CENTRAL PARK 7JPDATE / COMMUNITY CENTER PROJECT City Administrator Hedges provjfled.3t~ui?d3tte;ahthe.2TG1?itectural plans for the Community Center project. ADJ }RNME1Z t.-- The meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. MBM Date Deputy City Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternat ~i"-.a% t l; Braille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagari',•# ~ •1~` :fib C $ 00, (TDO phone: (651) 454-8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons l ?:equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed,Vedgion, national origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regard to public assistance. i MINUTES OF A LISTENING SESSION OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota April 17, 2001 Mayor Awada opened the April 17, 2001 Listening Session at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Room of the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Awada, Councilmembers Bakken, Carlson, Fields and Tilley. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert and Parks and Recreation Director Ken Vraa. The topics of discussion included a request for a stop sign on Blackhawk Road, the purchase of individual bricks for Central Park and the proposed kitchen at the Community Center. The Listening Session was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Date Deputy City Clerk 1 v MINUTES OF A LISTENING SESSION OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota April 3, 2001 Mayor Awada opened the April 3, 2001 Listening Session at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Room of the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Awada, Councilmembers Bakken, Carlson, Fields and Tilley. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert. Discussion was held regarding the plowing of sidewalks and a proposed group home to be located at 4324 Trenton Trail. The Listening Session was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Date Deputy City Clerk Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. GIS Technician/Public Works Division-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Erin Lunders as a GIS Technician in the Public Works Division. Item 2. Part-time Seasonal Lifeguards/Cascade Bay-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Nathan Dunn, Jennifer Kilby, Rebecca Gordon, Marm Rutman, Laura Hogenson, Katherine Brandt, Alexis Lund and Caren Honigsfeld as part-time seasonal lifeguards for Cascade Bay. Item 2. Part-time Seasonal Concessions Worker/Cascade Bay-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kali Bavender as a part-time seasonal concessions worker for Cascade Bay. Item 3. Part-time Seasonal Guest Services Worker/Cascade Bay-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Brent Reykdal as a part-time seasonal (Yuest services worker for Cascade Bay. . Item 4. Seasonal Horticultural Technician-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Richard Ruhnde as a seasonal horticultural technician. Agenda Item 5. Seasonal Forestry Technician-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Shaun Malady as a seasonal Forestry Technician. Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 6. Seasonal Tree Inspector-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Mike Sowers as a seasonal tree inspector. Item 7. Seasonal Recreation Leader-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kathleen Weinzettel as a seasonal Recreation Leader. Item 8. Seasonal Park Laborer-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Dale Bishop as a seasonal park laborer. Item 9. Seasonal Park Attendants-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Aaron Wheeler, Alounsak Sivongsay and Lindsay Stemig as seasonal park attendants. Item 10. Seasonal Ballfield Attendant-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kevin Weber as a seasonal ballfield attendant. Item 11. Seasonal Park Maintenance Workers-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Dave Streefland, Ryan Smolarck, Maria Struve, Robert Koenke and Lynn Streefland as seasonal park maintenance workers. Item 12. Part-time Seasonal Concessions Workers-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Melissa Buntjer, Kellee Kattleman and Christie Mason as part-time seasonal concessions workers. /3 1 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting Item 13. Resignation/Police Officer-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the letter of resignation from Police Officer Eric Huber. Item 14. Resignation/Utility Maintenance Worker-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the resignation of David Koski, utility maintenance worker. Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting C. APPROVE PROCLAMATION FOR PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ON FLAG DAY, JUNE 14, 2001 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Proclamation for Paul for the Pledge of Allegiance on Flag Day, June 14, 2001 FACTS: • Letters were received from the President of the National League of Cities and The National Flag Day Foundation encouraging the City to participate in the 22"d annual national "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" on Thursday, June 14. ATTACHMENTS: • The letter from the National League of Cities is attached as page • The letter from The National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. is attached as page • Additional information is attached as pages Lyj-q • The Proclamation is attached as page Z7-0- To strengthen and promote cities as centers of opportunity, leadership, and governance. February 1, 2001 National League Dear Mayor: Of CitieS I am writing this letter to our nation's municipal leaders to encourage you to lead your city or town in the 22nd annual national "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" on Thursday, June 14, 1301 Pennsylvania Ave, N.W as part of Flag Day observances throughout the United States. Washington, D.C. 20004-1763 The American flag is a symbol of our national heritage and our national unity. Throughout 202-626-3000 our history, it has stood for the "single nation of justice and opportunity" envisioned by fax: 202-626-3043 President Bush in his Inaugural Address. The "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" is an Internet: www.nlc.org opportunity for Americans everywhere to celebrate our blessings, and to affirm our beliefs and aspirations. It is a call for all Americans - regardless of age, race, religion, national origin, 2001 Officers geographic or political differences - to join in reciting the Pledge of Allegiance at 7 p.m. EDT President on Flag Day. Dennis W Archer Mayor, Detroit, Michigan First Vice President The ceremony was conceived in 1980 by the National Flag Day Foundation and has become KarenJ Anderson an annual event since then. It has gained widespread support from the President and Congress, Mayor, Minnetonka. Minnesota Second aka. Mi esota from state and local leaders, and civic, business, service, veterans and educational groups John DeStefano. J, nationwide. The "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" was made an official Flag Day Mayor, New Haven, Connecticut ceremony by an Act of Congress in 1985. Immediate Past President Bob Knight Mayor. Wichlla. Kansas The national ceremony will again be held at Fort McHenry in Baltimore, where Francis Scott becutive Director Key saw our young nation's flag flying during the War of 1812, inspiring him to write about DonaldJ Borut "The Star-Spangled Banner" in words that became our national anthem. President Bush is being invited to lead this year's "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" from the White House. In its effort to spread the word about Flag Day and the "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance," the National Flag Day Foundation has assembled a useful set of information and resources that can be downloaded from their Internet website: www.flagday.org. The information includes a sample proclamation, ideas for organizing events in your community, links to educational and historical materials, and other suggestions. Information can also be requested by contacting the National Flag Day offices in Baltimore. Help your citizens become part of this powerful expression of national solidarity and fellowship. Join in the "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" on Flag Day. Sincerely, Dennis W. Archer President Mayor, Detroit, Michigan enclosure Put PrWdeft Clarence E Anthony, Ma or, South Bay. Florida • Glenda E. Hood Mayor. Orlando, Florida • William H. Hudeut HL Councilman. Village of Chevy Chase, Maryland • Sharpe James, Maya. Newark New Jersey • Brian J. O'Neill, ; ouncdman, Philadelphia. PerrayNama • Ca ft Reynolds, Counc hyoman-at- arge, Denw.. Colorado • Directors: Jerry Bambayer, Commissiow, Covington. Kentucky • Ilamd Bat Mayo, Fat Worth. Texas • Robert Barlett Maya Monrovia. California • Joseph Brooks, Council Member, ReNwd. Virginia • TknW W Brown, Councilman. East Point Georgia • Charles J. Ca"Redd. Maya. Rochester, Minnesota • A. Ewrsize Clark Maya, Marion, North Carolina • Gwya lolem Clark-Reed, Commissioner, Deerfield Beach, Florida • Joel Copan, Executive Director. Connecticut Conference of Municipalities • Neil Dillari Maya, Carbondale, Illinois • William G. Dro" Jr, Eeanise Directs, New Jersey State League of Municipalities • Seemed J. hired, Map, Greenaaes, Florida • Tim al M. hlkorsea, Maya. New Castle, PennryMama • Ed Garza, Council Member, San Antonio, Texas • Gnorye G. Goodman, Ese um Directs, Michigan Municipal League • Michael A Gallia. Maya, Dearborn, Michigan • Larry Hale; Council Member, Richland, Washington • John Heilman, Councilmember, West Hollywood, California • Joseph Hihon, Mayor Pro Tern Hayvrard. California • Eddie A. Holloway, Counritrenber.. Hattiesburg. Mississippi • Joycelyn Y. Johnson, Alderman, Winston-Salem, North Carolina • Conrad Lae, Councdmember. Bellevue. Washirgoon • hprid Lindeman, Courcilmember, Aurora, Colorado • Moryaet Mahory, Mayor. Athens. Teaessee • Sonya E Margerum, Maya. West Lafayette. Indiana • Gary Markeoso4 Executive Director. Missouri Municipal League • Ber Perry, Council Member, Brea. California • Jar Phciotte, Council Member, Wichita, Kansas • Leh Guimaa, Council Member At Large, Newark New Jersey • Reis C. Ritchie, Exactim Director. Alaska Municipal League • Carroll G. RohneaK Council Member at-large, Houston. Texas • Perry Roquestae, Executive Director AlaWma League of Municipalities • W. Glenn Stockman. BL Councilmen, Ocean City. Maryland • Frank Smrzl Eecutrve Director. Texas Municipal League • Brace Tohey, Mayor, Glouces•.er, Massachusetts • Yvomm Vik Exasrtive Director. South Dakota Municipal League • Anthony Williams, Maya, Washington. DC • Cady Williams, Councilmember, Phoenix, Arizona • XartT W'bw, Maya. Grardview Missoun • Msk Wei Racyned Paper Mayor Pro Tem, Monroe. Michigan A The National Flag Day Foundation, Inc. } - 418 South Broadway * Baltimore, MD 21231 * (410) 563-FLAG it FAX (410) 342-8663 ''J * website www.flagday.org Chairman March 2001 Henry A. Rosenberg, Jr. Chairman & CEO Dear Mayor, Crown Central Petroleum On behalf of the National Flag Foundation Board Members and the many volunteers. I'd like to President Emeritus & Founder Louis V. Koerber thank you, your administration, other officials of municipal government and the citizens of your city Chairman for joining in the Foundation's 22nd annual National PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGF OF AT.T,F- Eudeke's Paints, a c. President GIANCE program of national unity. Richard M. Patterson As you know the Foundation and the National League of Cities are joining hands as partners for the Managing Partner Partnership Financial Group 19th year to honor our Nation and our Flag on Flag Day-, Thursday, June, 14, 2001. Weather it's ecre r called "The Grand Old Flag", "The Star-Spangled Banner" or "Old Glory" the Flag is more then George E. Thomsen, Esq. Just a bright confection of stars and stripes. It is our national totem, symbol of the triumph of the Thomsen and Burke. LLP Treasurer human spirit that helped create the greatest democratic republic in the history humankind; a bea- Rex Matthews con of freedom and liberty around the world. Vice President, Capital Markets Allfirst Bank We therefore, ask your support and cooperation in these specific areas: Assistant Treasurer • Please mail a letter to President George W. Bush urging him to lead all Americans in the 22nd William E. Thompson, III President annual National PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE on Flag Day, June 14. Brokerage Sales, Co. irectors: • Request that the President make a similar appeal on his weekly radio address on D Allen McC. Barrett, Jr. Saturday, June 9, 2001 Michael S. Craft • In your press release, please encourage all of your citizens to PAUSE FOR THE Thomas L. Davis PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, wherever they are, on Flag Day, June 14 at 7:00 p.m. EDT. Col. Howard S. Freedlander • Following your Flag Day ceremony, please send us copies of your Proclamation, copies of local Laura E. Joss George V. McGowan releases and any other information that you feel may be of value to us. James McManus (McKay) • Please use our Internet address (www.flagday.org) to obtain your 2001 Flag Day program Timothy C. Naylor materials located in the NFDF Press Kit. You can also fax your request to Patricia A. Peruke 410-256-1656 or 1-410-836-9295. Brooks Robinson The National Flag Day Foundation thanks you for your leadership as you help us pass the "Baton of General John W. Vessey, Jr. Patriotism to the youth of America. They truly are the future of our nation. Have a great Flag Day! USA (Ret.) Alan Walden Sincerely, Lynn Haxel Warner Directors Emeriti: Herbert E. Witz, Esq. Richard M. Patterson Dr. Milton S. Eisenhower President (1899-1985) Annual Pause For the Pledge of Allegiance * Flag Dad" USA * June 14, 7:00 p.m. EDT I Additional Educational Programs of The National Flag Foundation, Inc. The National Flag Foundation, Inc. Mission is: Through educational programs, to encourage Americans to better understand patriotism and the need to voice their allegiance to the nation and the flag, especially on Flag Day, June 14th 18th Annual Living American Flag, Tuesday, May 22, 2001, 9:00 a.m. at Fort McHenry Since 1984 approximately 3,500 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders from public, private, parochial and home study schools in Baltimore City and the surrounding counties have formed a Living American Flag in May at Fort McHenry. Francis Scott Key, Mary Pickersgili and twenty additional historic characters in period clothing engage with the students about their place and period of history in the 1800's. "21 Days to Honor America" June 14 - July The United States Congress dedicated the period from Flag Day, June 14th through Independence Day, July 4th, as "21 Days to Honor America" (89 Stat. 211). Our goal is to see reproductions of the historic Star-Spangled Banner Flag fly on all government, businesses, civic and service organizations and private flagpoles within Baltimore City during those official 21 days. We, of course, welcome others throughout the Country to partici- pate. Maryland's Salute to Flag Day Program Thursday, June 7, 2001 Maryland's Secretary of State and its State Department of Education join the National Flag Day Foundation in Annapolis, our State Capital, to honor 24 outstanding high school students from Baltimore City and each of Maryland's counties. Each local school Superintendent selects a student from a junior class based on academic standing, participation in school activities and involvement in community service. Students carry their county or city flags in a colorful parade followed by a prominent state official speaker, distribution of awards, tour and a luncheon in their honor. 22nd annual National PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Thursday, June 14, 2001, 6:00 P.M. On June 20, 1985, the Ninety-Ninth Congress passed and President Reagan signed Public Law 99-54 recognizing the PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE as part of the National Flag Day activities. It is an invitation urging all Americans to participate on Flag Day, June 14, 7:00 p.m. (EDT). This annual program at Fort McHenry, National Monument and Historic Shrine, features Units of the 229th Maryland Air and Army National Guard, patriotic music and entertainment, educational, historical information and concludes with fireworks by Zambelli. 418 South Broadway * Baltimore, MD 21231 * (410) 56(3'-F FLAG * FAX (410) 342-8663 * website www.flagday.org Id sP.EB cast` J em, T"a-2 n- pRi'u rJ~J) J ew"? ~J1~~*j~} OF' 5AJJa e, -J Us •J_JJ X J, ~jifJ~J lJ~J~Jr J M Li N"? -uzJa J INOORPORATLO March 2001 Re: National League of Cities National Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance Brothers in harmony The time is at hand to begin plans for the 22nd annual National Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance, which will be held Flag Day, June 14, 2001 at 7 p.m. EDT. National Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance observances are sponsored by local governments, usually through the mayor's office, with the assistance of the National Flag Day Foundation. Information about the event is mailed to all members of the National League of Cities. Barbershop chapters participate by providing the appropriate musical backdrop for the observances. Many chapters across the country have had very rewarding experiences participating in this event. The flag and the stirring sounds of our uniquely American barbershop harmony will provide the folks in your community the thrill of a lifetime. I encourage each chapter president to contact your mayor's office and offer the voices of your chorus. You can find out more about Society participation in the National Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance by going to the society web site (www.spebsqsa.org). There you'll also find a link to the National Flag Day Foundation's web site, from there go to the Press Kit link. Any questions should be directed to Society Public Relations Manager Reed Sampson, at (800)876-7464 x8592. This is an excellent opportunity to present our wondcrful barbershop harmony to what could be a whole new audience for your chapter and chorus. Good luck and good singing! Darryl Flinn Executive Director INTERNATIONAL OFFICE • 6315 THIRD AVENUE • KENOSHA, WISCONSIN • 53143-5199 • 414-653-8440 • FAX 414-654-4048 "KEEP THE WHOLE WORLD SINGING" /9 I CITY OF EAGAN PROCLAMATION PAUSE FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE WHEREAS, the American flag is a symbol of our national heritage and our national unity. WHEREAS, the Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance is an opportunity for Americans everywhere to celebrate our blessings, and to affirm our beliefs and aspirations. WHEREAS, the ceremony was conceived in 1980 by the National Flag Day Foundation and has become an annual event since then and has gained widespread support from the President and Congress, from state and local leaders, and City Council civic, business, service, veterans and educational groups nationwide. WHEREAS, the Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance was made an official Flag Day ceremony by an Act of Congress in 1985. WHEREAS, the City of Eagan will join with other organizations in celebrating "Pause for the Pledge of Allegiance" on Thursday, June 14, 2001 as part of Flag Day observances. Patricia Awada, Mayor May 1, 2001 ~0 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting D. APPROVE PROCLAMATION NAMING MAY 3, 2001 SPACE DAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Proclamation naming May 3, 2001 Space Day FACTS: • A letter was received from Tom Lindquist, Lockheed Martin, requesting support of a nationwide educational outreach called Space Day. • Mayor Awada signed the proclamation prior to approval at the request of Mr. Lindquist, to enable it to be displayed at an exhibit. ATTACHMENTS: • The letter from Mr. Lindquist is attached as page • The Proclamation is attached as page C:?P/ i Lockheed Martin Tactical S- stems Naca] Electronics R Sun eillance Sx stems P O. Box 645'_5 St Paul. MN 55164-0535 LOCKHEED MARTIN April 16, 2001 The Honorable Pat Awada Mayor of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55 22 Dear Mayor Awada, I would like to ask for your support of a nationwide educational outreach called Space Day. For the last four years, Lockheed Martin Corporation has championed this award-winning initiative that aims to get kids interested in space exploration, math, and technology. The enclosed brochure explains more about the program. In support of this year's Space Day celebration, I am asking you to consider signing the enclosed proclamation naming May 3, 2001 as Space Day in the city of Eagan. Local Lockheed Martin operations (Eagan) have celebrated Space Day in a variety of ways during the past four years. This year our activities are based at the Science Museum of Minnesota where we are partnering with a local space education entity, Project Universe, to create an exciting hands-on exhibit. Our Space Day exhibit will be open to school groups as well as the public on May 2, 3, and 5tn We would like to display the proclamation at the exhibit. Should you choose to support our Space Day activities this year, please return the signed document in the enclosed self- addressed envelope by April 24. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, J Tom Lindquist Director, Communications 651-456-2210 cc: Natalie Bam,zal www.spacedav.com a6~ LOCKHEED NAXTIM Mayoral Proclamation CITY OF EAGAN, MINNESOTA PROCLAMATION SPACE DAY, MAY 3, 2001 WHEREAS, Space Day is the culminating event of the year-round Embrace Space educational initiative, celebrating the extraordinary achievements, benefits and opportunities in the exploration and use of space; and WHEREAS, Space Day encourages people of all ages from around the globe to advance science, math and technology education, and to inspire future generations to continue the vision of our space pioneers; and WHEREAS, Space Day is an exciting time for all mankind as we stand at the threshold of a new age of space science and exploration, where the vision of our forefathers will become a reality through the hopes and dreams of our young people; and WHEREAS, the Embrace Space initiative is supported by more than 60 Partners representing a broad cross-section of educational, professional and trade associations, youth groups, corporations and space-related organizations; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan will join with other organizations in celebrating Space Day through educating and communicating the excitement and importance of space in our lives; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Pat Awada, Mayor, do hereby proclaim May 3, 2001 as SPACE DAY in the City of Eagan. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Val of the Co of E an to e be affixed this ; day of ~"i , 2001. Mayor -77 - L)3 - Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting E. APPROVE CITY AUCTION OF SURPLUS ITEMS ON MAY 19, 2001 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the date of May 19, 2001, for the City Auction FACTS: • An annual auction is held to sell City surplus and confiscated items to the public. • The auction is scheduled to be held, pending City Council approval, at the Maintenance Facility at 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, May 19. ay Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting F. APPROVE LEASE AGREEMENT FOR GOPHER RESOURCE CORPORATION FOR OUTLOT 1, GOPHER EAGAN INDUSTRIAL PARK 21p ADDITION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorization of signature for the renewable lease agreement between the City of Eagan and Gopher Resource Corporation. FACTS: • The property consists of Outlot I, Gopher Eagan Industrial Park 2°d Addition. located adjacent to the North Park property. • Gopher Resource Corporation has leased the property for several years. This lease is a continuation of the existing agreement. • The property is sub-leased for use as a compost operation. • Rent is paid to the City at a rate of $6,000 per annum, to be paid in semi-annual installments of $3,000. • The lease is automatically renewed for one year upon expiration of the initial term (ending March 15, 2002), until Gopher gives the City at least 60 to 90 days notice of lease termination. • The City can terminate the lease upon 120 days notice. • The agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: • None as' Agenda Information Memo April 27, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting G. DIRECT STAFF TO PREPARE ORDINANCE FOR ADMINISTERING CIVIL PENALTIES FOR LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATIONS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To direct staff to prepare an ordinance for administering civil penalties for liquor license violations. FACTS: • The City currently receives grant funds from the State to assist in performing compliance checks of liquor licensees for underage alcohol sales. • Under Minn. Stat. 340A.415, civil penalties for liquor license violations may be imposed by either the City or the State Commissioner of Public Safety. Historically, the City has relied on the State to administer the penalties. • The State now strongly recommends that the City begin imposing the civil penalties. It is Staff's belief that future grant funding for compliance checks may be at risk if the City neglects to assume this responsibility. • Staff believes an ordinance should be drafted in similar form to the tobacco compliance ordinance, where penalties for first, second, third and future violations are specified. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page is a letter dated March 14, 2001 from the State Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division. a~ AAINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-5133 Phone: 651/296-6159 FAX: 651.297.5259 TTY: 651/282-6555 Internet: http://www.dps.state.mn.us of March 14, 2001 Alcohol & City of Eagan Gambling Gene Van Overbeke, City Clerk Enforcement 3830 Pilot Knob Road Bureau of Eagan, MN. 55122-1810 Criminal Apprehension RE: See attached listing of establishments Capitol Security Dear Mr. Van Overbeke: Center for The Eagan Police Department has applied for grant funds from the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Crime Victim Division to conduct underage alcohol compliance checks within the community. The Eagan Police Services Department completed the checks on 8/28100, 9/5/00, 9/11/00, 9/18/00, 11/8/00, 12/6/00, 1/31/01, and Driver & Vehicle 2/23/01, and reported to the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division that the above named Services establishment(s) sold alcohol to an underage cooperating individual during the compliance check. Drug Policy & M. S. Chapter 340A.415 provides that the commissioner of Public Safety or the liquor license issuing Violence authority may impose a civil penalty of not more than $2,000, or license suspension or revocation Prevention against a liquor licensee for the sale of alcohol to a minor individual. The report from the Police Emergency Department indicated no knowledge regarding a civil penalty being imposed by your city council Management/ against the above named establishment(s) for the underage violation. Based on that information, it is our Emergency understanding that no civil penalty has been imposed by your city council. If a civil penalty has been Response imposed, we would greatly appreciate that information as soon as possible. It was noted on the reports Commission submitted by Eagan PD that "no civil penalties are being imposed by the Citv of Eagan". If this is the case, please indicate this decision on the enclosed forms which when completed must be State Fire returned to the address on the bottom of the form as well as this letter. Marshal/ Pipeline Safety The Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division strongly advises that local licensing officials handle State Patrol this civil penalty matter within their communities. If your city council does not assume the responsibility for the civil penalty against the above named establishment(s) within 90 days of the date Traffic Safety of this letter, the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division is prepared to apply the provisions of M. S. 340A.415 giving the commissioner the authority to impose a civil penalty against the liquor establishment(s) that failed the compliance check. $500 is the first time offense penalty that our office routinely imposes against establishments that sell to minors, and is also our recommendation to cities that wish to handle this matter themselves. Please advise our office immediately regarding civil penalty action taken by your city council against the above named establishment(s), by completing the enclosed forms and returning to: Brian Kringen, Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division, 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133, St. Paul, MN 55101. If you have questions, please call us at 651-282-5218 or 651-296-6430. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION PARYMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY i Frank Ball, Director a~ Agenda Information Memo April 27. 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting H. APPOINT HEARING OFFICER TO CONDUCT HEARING REGARDING LIQUOR LICENSE VIOLATION - CASPER'S ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To authorize the City Administrator to appoint a hearing officer to conduct a liquor license violation hearing mandated by State law and the City Code for Casper's Cherokee Sirloin Room, and to set a date for the hearing subject to availability of the hearing officer. FACTS: • The City conducts regular compliance checks for underage liquor sales at liquor licensee establishments throughout the year. • Eagan City Code Section 5.02 requires a hearing before the City Council if a liquor licensee has three violations in a 12-moth period, or four violations within a 36-month period. Alternatively, the City Council may appoint a hearing officer to conduct the hearing. • Casper's Cherokee Sirloin Room was cited for a violation on August 28, 2000, its third violation a 12-month period. • The purpose of the hearing as described in the City Code is "to determine whether a violation has occurred and the penalty to be imposed." When the hearing is conducted by a hearing officer, the hearing officer will determine whether a violation has occurred and the decision will be forwarded to the City Council for determination of the penalty, at which time a second hearing is held, affording the licensee an opportunity to be heard on the issue of the penalty. ATTACHMENTS: • None. Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting 1. ACCEPT MINNESOTA STATE ARTS BOARD GRANT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approval of the Minnesota State Arts Board Grant in the amount of $4,000. FACTS: • This is the first State Arts Board Grant received by the City of Eagan. • This grant will be used for the Youth Development Program Multicultural Festival, "Harvesting our Roots," which will take place Sunday, September 9, 2000. • Grant funds will be used for the Folk Arts portion of the festival. This includes folk artists fees and travel expenses, interpreter fees, technical personnel and promotion. • There is a matching requirement for the City. Half of this match may be in-kind contributions, the other half in hard dollars. ATTACHMENTS: • None ~9 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting J. FINAL SUBDIVISION (OAKBROOKE 5TH ADDITION) PULTE HOMES OF MINNESOTA, INC. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To approve a Final Subdivision creating 83 single family detached dwelling units upon property currently platted as Outlots B, D, E and F, Oakbrooke 2"d Addition and located north of Diffley Road and east of 1-3 5E in the SW 1/4 of Section 21. FACTS: ➢ At their regular meeting on August 4, 1998, the City Council approved the Preliminary Subdivision (and related Final Planned Development) which called for the creation of 313 single family detached dwelling units upon the entire 117 acre site. ➢ At their regular meeting on February 16, 1999, the City Council approved the Final Subdivision for "Oakbrooke" which was the initial phase of the development and consisted of 79 lots and 8 outlots. At their regular meeting on March 21, 2000, the City Council approved the Final Subdivision for "Oakbrooke 4`h Addition" which was the 2nd major phase of the development and consisted of 76 lots (the 2„ d and 3rd Additions were a corrective plat and the platting of right-of-way for Johnny Cake Ridge Road). The proposed subdivision constitutes the third phase of the Oakbrooke development. ➢ The Development Contract is expected to be in order and have been executed by May 1, 2001. ISSUES: ➢ The subject property overlays Lot 1, Block 1 and various outlots of the Oakbrooke 2nd Addition that was approved by the City Council in June of 1999 but has yet to be recorded. The Oakbrooke 2nd Addition should be recorded prior to the recording of the proposed Oakbrooke 51h Addition. ATTACHMENTS (1): Final Subdivision drawings, pages through,. .1 A V) W ~ N +qJ,_~ N j'sl W G"Z 1 sl I ~ ~ ~ ^ I• trr di 1•SI \\\~N'i \ ti• G~i/8.i, `~.~o-l{4 y` •t`"4~`~~/ 4 ^ \ t4 \ _ : i Q~`•• C '.tom. ° t\ " `1.e111` d^fi 4~ r// ~Oj;'` i°±d ~;`~rNr •:w ~s° \`s -n- •..is ~8~ - ,per..-_.. ~ _ ~d" i ~ \~g S oi^ r~.s°° ~~c•t:._. _ ` I 9405 `x/ ~ 1. w71 "%•or ~ ASS 7~z. AKAWOf ~ _I S Atrst ~ .~v ~e { \ 11. nl .y. • tp iY, y Q g CY ^ T ,Y r ~ ~ 1 .mow., 8 $ •'Ai cy o o,"t \ £ F „i. •R~ «.ro = lrti Z nrnbr• S f ( ..!y , L 1 s+.vnt wrti ssr•f°~ «m •wrnron \ O v ~i ! ff~ a8~t° ~.~.`..s, t,raon ara `••.tq~ ' $;s y4 ±l rs~ i1• J Ztb4 fys.°a "~'t ~.-q _~~5 Ein A - • \ .-4 don 4 ~ ~Z F~~' j 81r' 'I a yy a~ _eii°: E3 o~s'a~y '.1 t _rr= • ~.~t• MID .8 g e J^•RSJ 7. C. f f 5 i S y pr vo ;j.. ~ .a as s $ s"°° ~•y,,ti_ ~i ^j 8 0° 1 V n it 31 i j Y iS3Z ;l ~ 3E ~ ~ i s ` F si-ir~ ! Z W LAJ 9 E~ Z: ~ I t e i I ~f8g . Z ~ Y i = s~ s a a Ie i -oSi I Y E o Ifi Zli 8Y IZ •°Y Q! a t 3. is $ Zj ' $ L...1 LLJ Ir 79 io~a•a Z~ a {~Z_ 3 g g Z •Z ~ Z ~ ~ ~ s p $ ~ ~ a p I ~ t y i■ ~ .e : ~ . Yg~F , rr ZB Q F Z • ~ e < I Ft° I ~ I~ V FF I its o: FC 3 n I Is y~ ~ tt. q° _ _ 5 g I ~ e ss f i o ~ u~~ ~a r g r ~ j r O F° f5 _ I~ ~o L7 ~tu $ u 9 °O u a= • i_ i~ li :a xe ° < ~ r c Q ~p F~ F I 1 1 i 'q~ I I assi E 0-7 W dS a_6s 94 Al ? S to .tq `•~.•1 lq~.. 8. ,f. 4 [ ° 4 4 a . 4 Y fir, 1 '01 p ~ ~ ~ tames o i o ~ h s t ; : °j• ~ O = . •`v. Y • l..lrj "O. P!.'~•ac<:.•'..4 Y•rez ~/~'.-eC / b'; :'~4 ~t.,,y4,, 1Q tfs : e'i \ b d4 ry h' i iPe t +r •7 y8 d { ~ T; S , ~ L4. / ~ \ a R 7 a G. N i-0 4 J N e4 i. AS ~ 4 f L <5' n• _ - ~ ;4; 1''•. S~.eb 7 P dg t., 4 8 D J/ : 4q, 8+1 • N L s ~ • F E 1 8ey0 , 'P.~ ^•y •*d 4 ~S~P L44~ ag sd~a~s Z~ •x Y', P P ti I, •y\ ••y 24r _ i ~iS g4e4 VY -•F aS.. 1~ • 0 J ~4 4\ h Tn `f~ ) •N i w yf 2:f>s~ 1 P o' P . 'r;e % toe r'•a,S► x:. • Y[a5~6g feti p F ; r 8.~ i~ f t ti^~¢ * ~ / ti7 i 'b f3~s-i~¢ ~~4 faro{ ? - ••8ero O,, +'vm ~O~E%/ ;Per, °j •aS i l:Ef .S a.+a,c.~ie'~' 4"~,. F .A 8 ~ ~ ~gR00IC E ;y'' ' ,y Pao r ; i E : $S 1w.¢as•t° ~i^.;,_ 8 b,.q •"'aam ,~i`T+s s` y~.• y{A ~ e0 i.'E _ 5is ro ..raf`°` 4 b. j R O ~ B itc~.'m m• 8 8~ ~ Y~Y A,S`~ . Y ~ • ~4. lc°~?G 4 ~ ? d ~J 6M 8 aM • y ~ ` ,tts t d j:: Q " mar ~ ~ _ ! { •°yt s a r V ~ vo Q u N 3a W W R n - i LL, I O B z a.um~r 1071.70 z S f.:: '!r oczR •n.R.rv. A r------i- t---- C. -7 , • / Iw ' = Lij i --J-~-~. p~ o - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,R r R a I t. al S r~ 1+l f l y 1 7~ C~ a I ~snz 'f-------` fa ---win I 7 I ro: x 1 ° MI' VI 4- 1• •le E Es:j oCY -J--- a r a 7 7 su- ` 1.7 E~~`•i~l ir--- - Mni rr. f a I ✓ ro 1~^o'Etsrs _ _ _ e Sam{ co _R y I ~f.~7,C 1 }ii 'µ.a m /A /.i . ~ E ` o~ J ~ .Q8 ~i~ ~ 1 R~.T~~ :r.ia.» v3cicz 1 £ m ~A / ~.i ~.~~^~w• e~ ~ Nr-: W w / •'o ( v / i/ 1071. / r,•~ 1 °~•'`"arm " 1 rz~liYOd'~ ~.y~: ~ = °:y b\<o. ; O~Yo~., _riTiz-e`-. -8~• .+.`°q. b0 \~,/i .o'yc / b^•{ 10 'tee I ~ ~ a '~'4 ( f~ ' •S, 9'? ~ ~ : ~ ^ i ~ / O - x`11\. p 'r--_' .qi\ ,b` .('y 0__-i c.ic~•"ras.e• _.e~ a.~--- RK, rj'~'4~ y41• ~T'•'~/. _ rt ••e 1 Q W= Z~ Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council K. FINAL SUBDIVISION AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (WOODSTONE TOWNHOMES) - TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT, INC. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Final Subdivision to create 35 lots and one outlot for construction of 34 townhome units on 10.7 acres located at 1525 and 1535 Deerwood Drive, north of Deerwood Drive across from Deerwood Elementary and Blackhawk Middle Schools in the NE 1/4 of Section 21. To approve a Final Planned Development to create 35 lots and one outlot for construction of 34 townhome units on 10.7 acres located at 1525 and 1535 Deerwood Drive, north of Deerwood Drive across from Deerwood Elementary and Blackhawk Middle Schools in the NE '/4 of Section 21. FACTS: • The Council approved the Preliminary Subdivision and Preliminary Planned Development on January 16, 2001. • All documents are anticipated to be signed and in order for execution at the regular meeting of the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: Final Plat, page 34 R ~I y 1 ffffff S~ _ _ ~ I .e °;tom: r a; /H b FW<a 8 H ~ I / ♦w1 i/ JN00 wpn F I «rs e.o..rc.oo 1 ~R __+ro+~ ~ .Tee. ~.o•.m,oos . oee Y 8r! ' eTOe, L4 r., n / «S: keor, • co / tyros 6: m~e'~•~• oc-r. 4a Nt / da B ~O g. r°~•.41por ~ .I R i~,E I J* ck- ru-- 0-0 s a ; 8 $ Pa 9. P eoq' r+e1 'S iY , / O ~ g 8 N Si 8 ' ~l°g r+ ^ roe" ~i~• IS_ i / r Q - i r ~ • l `co- ' rr//~ I Y8 N S;- w Yw 7. r ¢y / 1 ?i ttl/e I:. n \ :cncs ro ^ rr,r ° 7r i ~n r rv ~ L _ .i / (8 s !ti (•°•sr 's ,c`l W ro^t~..a.ex• - _ _ nos I /'T` - - - ///,f mn Y` sl8 = I I J ~ y; .,g N ~ / Y K w•s :e >s? $ ~•x.r,c_P f y R 'F4 ~~az w+m /,oy 4'r •ac,q~,~ 3f EQ f' I " ' 1t: r.~\ A\S ~•///.t~~`„~/F :~a 3~4c• it¢ f ? I ~ -.oc -R 814-e A4 Cc S \ • e _ ^S: ~ 81~ a~ Rte' / r e~ " 6. ` sa ~ ~sa.8 s t~ 8 4 $819 '~'d O a / f ° 4- ?.E2 F n ~ _ O 7:o X Si 8 N EI Sl xc: cee.m R •44~ 25 - s~•'ro « L ocrx -~e"e-' ~ _'S ~~a'°oei+o- f I 4 ~ i-- i ° I 8 I \ C'S: :ll6\ J F.' VI 21 I .1 / sic ` €8 ~ $I" - ~ s {a G eoe. •ax. YI S. 8 R - f `Ki .e ~ • g S c: 8s 3 8 N S.i - I I ~ l ; sl !s ~ R) ~ I x GI rosy I_ - e / Y YID r; Y~ 8 wTC Y - i J - I Z ^ ~ mT: •nc 91 I - O ` ~.\r' ~ OCT. h.fJ• ~ 1 ` ~ i f~Ct cam' € I. i t1 I ~ . na, ~ .wee 1 A, C, re I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3~ Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting L. CONTRACT 01-02. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK STREET OVERLAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the bids for Contract 01-02 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park- Street Overlay), award the contract to McNamara Contracting for the base bid in the amount of $806,699, and authorize the Mayor and Deputy Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The bituminous overlay of the streets in the Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Eagandale Office Park Additions is programmed for 2001 in the City's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (2001-2005). • On March 6, 2001, the City Council authorized the street improvements for Eagandale Center Industrial Park and Eagandale Office Park (City Project No. 799) under one contract (Contract 01-02). • On April 3, 2001, the Council approved the plans and authorized the advertisement for solicitation of competitive bids for Contract 01-02. • At 10:30 a.m. on April 26, formal bids were received for this project. A copy of the bid tabulation is enclosed. • All bids have been reviewed for compliance with the bid specifications and accuracy on unit price extensions and summations. The low bid from McNamara Contracting has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. ATTACHMENTS: 0 Bid Tabulation, pagZ BID SUMMARY Eagandale Center Industrial Park/ Eagandale Office Park- City Project No. 799 Street Improvements City Contract No. 01-02 Bid Date: Thursday, April 26, 2001 Bid Time: 10:30 a.m. Contractors Total Base Bid 1.) McNamara Contracting, Inc. $ 809,699 2.) Ace Blacktop, Inc. $ 826,599 3.) Valley Paving, Inc. $ 857,826 4.) Bituminous Roadways $ 898,396 5.) Hardrives, Inc. $ 906,542 6.) Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $ 961,348 Eagandale Center Industrial Park/ Eagandale Office Park - Project 799 Low Bid $ 809,699 Feasibility Report Estimate $ 1,023,290 Percent Under Estimate -20.9% Engineer's Estimate $ 970,000 Percent Under Estimate -16.5% 3? Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting M. PROJECT 761. DUCKWOOD DRIVE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 761 (Duckwood Drive - Street Overlay) and schedule a public hearing to be held on June 5, 2001. FACTS: • Project 761 provided for the bituminous overlay of Duckwood Drive (Denmark Avenue to Lexington Avenue) and Kinglet Court and Crossroad Court cul-de-sacs. • This project, constructed under Contract 00-04, has been completed, all costs tabulated, and the final assessment roll prepared. • This roll is being presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present the final costs to be levied against the benefited properties. • An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled prior to the final assessment hearing with the affected property owners and address any concerns. • The final assessments are approximately 15% under the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on October 19, 1999. 3e Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 N. PROJECT 771, LEXINGTON AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AGREEMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve a Traffic Control Signal Agreement for Project 771 (Lexington Avenue, Town Centre Drive to Clubview Drive - Street, Utility & Trail Improvements) with the Dakota County Highway Department and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The City of Eagan is the lead agency in partnership with the Dakota County Highway Department in the proposed upgrade of Lexington Avenue to a four-lane divided highway between Town Centre Drive and Clubview Drive. • The upgrade of Lexington Avenue includes the installation of new traffic control signals at the intersections with Northwood Parkway/Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Clubview Drive. It also includes street lights, emergency vehicle pre-emption, and signing at the intersection, interconnection to the existing Lexington Avenue traffic control signals at Lone Oak Road and Yankee Doodle Road, and associated improvements at the existing signals. • An agreement between the City of Eagan and the Dakota County Highway Department has been prepared providing for the cost, maintenance, and operation of the traffic signal improvements. • City staff have reviewed this agreement and found it to be similar to other traffic signal agreements with the highway department and in order for favorable Council action. 39 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting 0. CONTRACT 00-09D, NORTH WATER TREATMENT PLANT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the 2°d and Final payment for Contract 00-09D (Reroofing - North Water Treatment Plant) to Walker Roofing inc. in the amount of $11,726 and accept for perpetual maintenance subject to warranty provisions. FACTS: • Contract 00-09D provided for the reroofing of the North Water Treatment Facility located on Coachman Road. This work has been completed in accordance with the City approved plans and specifications as verified by the city's consultant, Roof Spec Inc. and found to be in order for favorable action by the City Council for formal acceptance of perpetual maintenance subject to the contract warranty provisions. ZIA Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 P. PROJECT 790R, CENTRAL PARKWAY NO PARKING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve a resolution to prohibit parking on Central Parkway between Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) and Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The City of Eagan is currently designing the street and utility improvements for the proposed construction of Central Parkway as an urban two-lane divided roadway between Yankee Doodle Road and Pilot Knob Road as part of Project 790R. • It is desirable for the City to obtain the use of State Aid funding, to reimburse the construction costs of the proposed improvements under said project. • The proposed design of the urban two-lane divided roadway for Central Parkway meets the State Aid standards for a major collector with no on-street parking. • Minnesota Rules Chapter 8820 (State Aid standards) requires a resolution from the Council prohibiting parking on all State Aid designated roadways where parking lanes are not provided. ATTACHMENTS • Resolution, page. ~I CITY OF EAGAN A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON Central Parkway Between Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) and Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 1st day of May, 2001, by the City of Eagan in Dakota County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of Central Parkway, known at Project 790R, from Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) to Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) in the City of Eagan, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the "City" will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the planned improvement of Central Parkway; and WHEREAS, this planned improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on Central Parkway between Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28) and Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31) at all times. DATED this V day of May, 2001. Patricia E. Awada, Mayor ATTEST: Mira McGarvey, Deputy Clerk CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Dakota City of Eagan I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a Resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Eagan at a duly authorized meeting thereof held in the City of Eagan, Minnesota, on the 1st day of May, 2001, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. Mira McGarvey, Deputy Clerk G PESOLUT]ONSNo Parking - Central Parkwa}' ~a Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Q. REQUEST MUNICIPAL STATE AID ROUTE REVISIONSIDESIGNATIONS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve resolutions requesting the Commissioner of Transportation's approval of the deletion of Yankee Doodle Road (Trunk Highway 13 to Inver Grove Heights border) and Lexington Avenue (Cliff Road to Trunk Highway 55) from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) system and the addition of MSA street designation for a variety of local collector streets. FACTS: • The MSA designation of a street enables the maintenance of the street to be financed by the City's portion of the gas tax money distributed by the state. • Yankee Doodle Road and Lexington Avenue are both County roads that have been designated as part of the City's MSA system over the past ten years. Due to revisions in the County State Aid (CSA) designation policy, the County would now like to add these County roads to the CSA system. A roadway cannot have both county and municipal designation. • With this deletion of this MSA mileage, other appropriate streets within the City can be designated as MSA streets to ensure the City continues to receive its portion of the gas tax appropriation. • Approximately 7.2 miles of MSA designation will be available for existing and proposed streets with the removal of the county roads from the MSA system. A number of existing streets meet the criteria of MSA streets in terms of location, function and construction. The attached list of streets would be designated accordingly to incorporate the available MSA designation mileage. ATTACHMENTS: • MSA Street Designations, page. ~3 0 V co rn C Q1 0) m (D co (D co (D C C a, ^ ~ m m (D 0 rn M O _ C co a) C 0) 0) CC7) O 0~ a7 •('r C 0 N c ~ 0 C a. OC c, m L, rn rn c o V U~ a m m m m co m° rn v c o o c m i, rn v m m m m o n° cl Y c a) I2 to m rn rn 4n ^m c c v L F y O U CD v O G O° m 0 co Im M r- !D Lo CD 0 G O n O C m N O G7 ti e (D (C O O N mLn C u - N N N lD tD U C O R m cc w O C m m (D co co O N cD m m (D m m O 67 C D C N U " C cc , 7 ~ r N O (D ti N 0 0^ N N O t(1 N R p 0 Q~ 0i ON' 7 C Q 0 to LL ^ D Q (D N (D N 0011 LO 'IT N 07 N (07 N W a y O O to 11 V, v to c ((p M. YC', 10f) ~ f•i O Ql ~ N c f`7 ~ y N N N N C C - (p O - C C ri c o o 0) LU m c c F- c c c D O l°) . 2 N V. r N C Q) c O m 0) c CJ L') J _ c U 0 U a 0 D y l G O R U a ~ R o C z W o Y a tt a o 0 Q O Q~ r1 C N O Q C tD cc ui L t7 - co m c m m m cc C ~p x N 2 O O T. r~ (D C d (D n O G cc c QZ In (D 0) (D C x C m m m IL L O Q'. W N N Y. N N Y. N d Q~ t' dt Q1 d G' ° d c a y a a - - - _ - - d a a a N E E E E E E E Z rn E N LO E c E a rn- e M (n cD Z LU - n c ca c E E E u~ ~n e (D q cr J- o- o Lo m C- 11 r O O O C O C O N m o co n C C C C Z T ~ 3 a C C C m ~ z m Cn c s a c Lll > a ° c > 0 m J` C Z > 3 a r a O c< c a -6 c _ 2-C Y Cn 0 0 p a, z o E C ~C3'' m > UC c Q B F v; z a o) < y c ~c ° t a 0) -M > J Q. Z - L c LU U T O°°° C o c o o c C u R o u m a c O O J--- a a- ai Q m C mCb ti o c y LLJ .0 '0 Or o° 20 M v" 0° zC cO° E 0<c, o~ v O> _O 0 C C ti C C Y L O M O [L'„ T Q. d } d G J } Lr Z a d z C7 C C ° O a O~ LL w c 'o _c E E E Q, ° x > x r F- z W a Q p LU a) Cl) < ? a c v Vi < 6 `co. c a c = > ti a` o a ti _ N a c: qc C N C L _ a, F- O c Jz c °=J O o v a. Q. O d R J f0 c °c c C c E a c y E c v 'r, _c` 2 M c _o c ti y r Q, O w ; me a F 3 c E J° a o a o c° C a X o r, c W y a ti c c ~z 3 w~c v,~ 2 E a a r Q nc az 41 CL N < r (D O 0 C. z U < v, U G L)" Z L 1-:1 y Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting R. PROJECT 768, NORTHWOOD PARKWAY RIGHT OF WAY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the Right of way acquisition agreement with Wenzel Financial, Inc., and authorize the Mayor and Deputy clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Project 768 provides for the extension of Northwood Parkway across I-35E from Denmark Ave. to Pilot Knob Rd. This alignment traverses the open undeveloped property adjacent to Glen Pond Apartments. • The property owner has processed several different development proposals over the last 2+ years that has addressed to various degrees the future roadway alignment of Northwood Parkway. The City subsequently approved Official Map #1 on February 6, 2001 defining and preserving the corridor of this road so that it would have to be taken into consideration with any future development proposal. • During this same time frame, the City initiated and negotiated a land swap proposal to facilitate the acquisition of this right of way. The details of this agreement have now been worked out to the satisfaction of both the property owner and City staff and it is now being presented to the Council for their formal approval. When approved, the developer will then be able to proceed with the processing of the subdivision application for the Glen Pond 2°d Addition. ATTACHMENTS: • Agreement, pagesgthrough . AGREEMENT 4/24/01 Version This Agreement is made this day of , 2001, by and between WENZEL FINANCIAL, INC., a Minnesota corporation (hereinafter "Wenzel"); and the CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter the "City") (collectively referred to as the "Parties"). WHEREAS, Wenzel is the fee owner of certain property located in the City of Eagan, County of Dakota, State of Minnesota and legally described as: Lot 1, Block 2, Effress Addition, except that part of said Lot 1 described as follows: commencing at the most northwesterly corner of said Block 2; thence North 89 degrees 46 minutes 17 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the northerly line of said Block 2 a distance of 86.67 feet to the most westerly corner of said Lot 1; thence northeasterly along a tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 278.33 feet and a central angle of 43 degrees 54 minutes 06 seconds a distance of 213.10 feet, said curve being the northwesterly line of said Lot 1, thence North 45 degrees 54 minutes 11 seconds East along the northwesterly line of said Lot 1 a distance of 40.0 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence South 44 degrees 05 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 417.0 feet; thence North 45 minutes 54 minutes 11 seconds East a distance of 395.0 feet; thence North 33 degrees 05 minutes 59 seconds West a distance of 195.0 feet more or less to the northerly line of said Lot 1; thence westerly and southwesterly along the northerly and northwesterly line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. AND: Lot 2, Block 2, Effress Addition (hereinafter the "Wenzel Property"); and WHEREAS, the City has acquired excess right-of-way from the Minnesota Department of Transportation that is adjacent to the Wenzel Property or otherwise owns the Property legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 3, Effress Addition. (hereinafter the "City Property"); and WHEREAS, in connection with Public Improvement Projects 768 and 790 and the Project commonly known as the Northwood Parkway ring-road (collectively the "Project"), the City desires to construct roadway and utility improvements over, under and across portions of the Wenzel Property (hereinafter the "Roadway Improvements"); and 4 WHEREAS, the City and Wenzel have reached an agreement to facilitate the City's construction of the Roadway Improvements, including, among other things, the transfer of the City Property to Wenzel, in exchange for the conveyance by Wenzel of the necessary right-of- way to the extent it traverses the Wenzel Property to facilitate the construction of the Roadway Improvements under the Project. NOW, WHEREFORE, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Grant of Right-of-Way by Wenzel to the City. Wenzel shall, at no cost to the City, dedicate the Right-of-Way for Northwood Parkway on the plat of "Effress Second Addition" (the "Plat") in the location shown on the final plat approved by the City, which location will be the same or substantially the same as approved by the City in the preliminary plat approval. 2. Conveyance of City Property to Wenzel. Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the City shall execute and deliver to the Escrow Agent a Quit Claim Deed, in the form and text of Exhibit "A" attached hereto, conveying the City Property to Wenzel. 3. Additional Obligations of the City. The City agrees to undertake the following additional responsibilities: a. Assessments. The City agrees not to specially assess, pursuant to MINN. STAT. Chapter 429, the Wenzel Property or the City Property for any portion of the Project costs. b. Reconstruction of Access for Wenzel Financial Apartment Building, The City shall, at the City's sole cost and expense, reconstruct the driveway access for the apartment building that is located at the Northeasterly intersection of High Site Drive and Pilot Knob Road. The driveway access shall be constructed in a location which is the same or substantially the same as shown on the site plan drawings attached hereto as Exhibit "B" prior to the time that the City commences any construction on the portion of Northwood Parkway, which would impact such driveway access. C. Vacation of Marice Drive and High Site Drive. The City has previously held the necessary public hearings for the vacation of Marice Drive from High Site Drive to Sherman Court and a portion of High Site Drive in the area cross-hatched on Exhibit "C". The City Council shall take immediate action on adopting the necessary approvals for the vacation of Marice Drive from High Site Drive to Sherman Court and a portion of High Site Drive. In the event additional hearings are necessary, the City agrees to 2 47 i promptly hold any necessary public hearing for the consideration and approval by the city Council of the vacation of Marice Drive from High Site Drive to Sherman Court and a portion of High Site Drive. d. Environmental Clearance. The City agrees to retain Braun Intertec to submit a work plan for review and approval by Dakota County. In the event that Dakota County determines that additional environmental remediation is necessary on Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 3 Effress Addition, then, in that event, the City agrees, at its sole cost, to undertake remediation of the soils. The City shall use its best efforts to obtain, prior to December 31, 2001, the county's removal of the City Property from any county "dump" listing. Wenzel agrees to use its best efforts to provide the City, prior to June 1, 2001, with its development plans, grading plans, basement elevations, finish grade elevations and final elevations, as well as any other information that may be necessary to allow the City to obtain the removal of the City Property from any County "dump" listing. e. Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm Sewer Assessments. The City agrees to waive any levied or pending assessments against Lots, 1, 2 and 3, Block 3, Effress Addition and that the same shall be conveyed to Wenzel free and clear of any assessment obligations. Wenzel shall be responsible for any customary SAC, WAC or other development charges that are payable in connection with the issuance of a building permit. With respect to Lots 4 and 5, Effress Addition, there are deferred assessments for storm sewer lateral totaling $25,300.00 for both lots. Wenzel agrees that it will pay this amount, without interest, within 30 days of final plat approval of the Plat; or, at Wenzel's option, it may have this amount levied as an assessment against the property payable over 10 years with interest thereon at the rate of 7'/z% per annum and the first installment due in 2002. These two lots are also subject to future trunk area storm sewer charges (from calendar year 2001- subject to change in future years) in the amount of $19,700.00. Wenzel agrees to pay these charges within 30 days of final plat approval of the Plat, or at Wenzel's option, it may have this amount levied as an assessment against the property payable over 10 years with interest thereon at the rate of 7'/Z% per annum, and the first installment due in 2002. f. Extension of Sherman Court. Until such time as the City has undertaken the necessary public improvements to extend Sherman Court to the Wenzel Property, Wenzel agrees to construct a temporary entrance driveway from the internal parking lots of the 3 Plat to the intersection of Marice Drive and Sherman Court. If the city commences the grading of Northwoods Parkway (under Project 768) in the vicinity of extended Sherman Court by September 1, 2001, the City shall also do the necessary public street improvements at that time to extend Sherman Court to Northwoods Parkway, and have the same substantially completed by December 1, 2001. 4. Waiver of Trespass. Wenzel hereby grants unto the City, its agents, servants, representatives and contractors, the right to enter upon the Wenzel Property.to facilitate surveys, soil borings, and other inspections for the construction of the Roadway Improvements. However, actual construction of the Roadway Improvements on the Northwood Parkway right-of-way traversing the Wenzel Property shall not be commenced until after the Plat is duly executed and recorded, provided that the City may immediately enter upon the Wenzel Property to construct the necessary improvements for the signal improvements at the intersection of Pilot Knob Road and Northwoods Parkway. Until the Plat is executed by Wenzel and recorded, nothing in this Agreement shall be the conveyance of any right-of-way or easement rights, and if the Plat is not recorded, the City shall be required to commence condemnation proceedings against Wenzel with respect to the right-of-way or easement necessary for the signal improvements. 5. Grant of Temporary Construction Easements. Wenzel acknowledges that the City may not immediately undertake all of the public improvements contemplated under the Project. Wenzel agrees, at no cost to the City, to grant such additional reasonable temporary construction easements in favor of the City and its contractors as may be needed to complete the public improvements under the Project as long as the temporary construction easements do not cause any material disruption to the operations of the apartment buildings now or hereafter located on the Wenzel Property or the City Property. 6. Governing Law. This Agreement shall in all respects be subject to, and governed by, the laws of the State of Minnesota. 7. Representations and Warranty. Wenzel represents and warrants that it has good right and title to transfer the easements identified in Paragraph 1 to the City. In the event the City discovers that there is any mortgage or other encumbrance affecting marketability, Wenzel agrees to use its best efforts to obtain the consent of its mortgagee to the easements, or such other documents as may be reasonably required by the City to ensure marketability of title. 8. Escrow Agent. For purposes of this Agreement, the Escrow Agent shall be Dakota County Abstract and Title. The Parties agree to hold the Escrow Agent harmless from any and all claims relating to its role as Escrow Agent under this 4 5~9 Agreement. The City shall pay the deed tax on the deeds of the City Property to Wenzel. Wenzel shall pay for the cost of recording the deeds and the Plat. Wenzel shall pay for the costs of its title insurance for the City Property. The closing fee charged by the title company shall be paid one-half by Wenzel and one-half by the City. Each party shall pay its own attorneys' fees relating to this Agreement. The Escrow Agent shall be responsible for recording the Plat and the Deed for the City Property. The Escrow Agent shall be instructed that it can only release the deed for the City Property for recording if the same is done contemporaneously with the recording of the plat. 9. Slope Easement. Wenzel may petition the City to vacate a portion of the slope easement reserved by the City over Lot 3, Block 3, Effress Addition, in exchange for its construction of a retaining wall. Provided that the retaining wall shall be constructed by Wenzel at its sole cost and expense and provided further that the proposed wall must satisfy the requirements of the City Engineer. 10. Contingency. Wenzel's obligations to deliver its documents to the Escrow Agent are contingent upon the following, which Wenzel may waive in its sole discretion: a. Wenzel shall have procured, at his expense, a commitment for title insurance with respect to the City Property showing good and marketable title in the City with respect to the City Property, subject to no mortgages or encumbrances, and subject only to the following restriction: No access shall be permitted to Trunk Highway 390 renumbered 35E. b. There shall be no recognized environmental conditions, within the meaning of ASTM Standard E1527, with respect to any of the City Property. C. Wenzel shall have received final plat approval and other City approvals for the construction of its apartment project. d. The portion of Marice Drive and High Site Drive to be vacated hereunder shall have been vacated and the title insurance company shall be in a position to insure title thereto in favor of Wenzel. WENZEL FINANCIAL, INC., a Minnesota corporation By: Its: 5 Sb CITY OF EAGAN, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Patricia E. Awada Its: Mayor By: Mira McGarvey Its: Deputy Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001, by , the of Wenzel Financial, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2001, by Patricia E. Awada and Mira McGarvey, the Mayor and Deputy Clerk of the City of Eagan, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: SEVERSON, SHELDON, DOUGHERTY & MOLENDA, P.A. 7300 West 147th Street, Suite 600 Apple Valley, MN 55124 (952) 432-3136 (RBB:206-16648/206-17802) 6 ~1 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting S. GOPHER RESOURCES - NEW WELL INSTALLATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the installation of a 10" well at 3385 Hwy 149 (Gopher Resources) with related conditions. FACTS: • The City has received a request from Gopher Resources to install a new (replacement) 10" well at 3385 Hwy 149. The old well was in use since 1947 but had failed beyond repair. The applicant has received the necessary permits and approvals from the MN. Department of Health and Dakota County Environmental Management. • City Code Sec 4.30, Subd.5H (Wells) states that any well greater than 4" must receive council approval. Although City water is served to this property, the well is used only for cooling their process operations. Based on the volume and purpose of the water needs, it is not necessary that it receive City treatment (iron & manganese removal, fluoridation, etc.). • Representatives of the Public Works Utility Maintenance Division have reviewed the application and found it to be in conformance with the City's plumbing and interconnection restriction requirements. ISSUES: • Due to the complexities of the internal plumbing system and the dual supply sources, it is important the City insure that all discharges to the City's sewer system are properly accounted for. Therefore, it is recommended that as a condition of approving this private well installation, that Gopher Resources be required to install a sewer discharge meter on their sanitary sewer service line before the well is put into operation. ATTACHMENT: • Application letter, page 3 April 26, 2001 CITY OF EAGAN Atm. City Council/ Mr. Tom Colbert/ Mr. Paul Hoyer 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 RE: REQUEST FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A NEW WELL @ GOPHER RESOURCES 3385 Highway 149, Eagan Dear Council Members; Bergerson-Caswell Inc. & Gopher Resources requests that you grant us permission to install a replacement well for industrial use at the above referenced property. According to current City of Eagan ordinance, all new well installations over 4" diameter must be approved by the City Council. This was something that I was not aware of. As a well drilling contractor that has been in business for 53 years and has worked with the City on almost every well that you own it caught me by surprise. We are making this request based on Gopher Resources need for industrial process water. Their current water well was recently sealed, so we could meet the State of Minnesota Department of Health guidelines for installing a replacement well. Their original well was installed in 1944 and has been maintained by the facility since then to provide all process water. The well has deteriorated over time due to the age and type of construction. We are requesting to install the same type of high capacity well with 10" well casing and 8" telescoping Stainless Steel Well Screen. The total anticipated depth will be 375' and finished in the glacial Drift. The water bearing formation we will be utilizing is not the same aquifer the City wells are finished in and should have no direct impact on your water wells. We have been trying to install this replacement well for the past two months, but due to the current well isolation distances and available locations. It has taken longer than anticipated for obtaining the well permit. Therefore we are requesting you grant us permission in accordance with your city ordinances for this new water well construction. The connection of the proposed well will be made to Gopher Resources distribution system as the previous well was connected, and it will not be connected to the City of Eagan's water distribution network directly. There is an interconnect between the two systems, but it has proper reverse flow valves that do not allow water from Gopher's system to enter the Cities distribution. Sincerely, BERGERSON-CASW ELL INC. C- - Gtt/i L F f ✓Av.>~.f,e Tim Berquam Project Manager G i Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS A. ASSESSMENT ROLL OF DELINOUENT FALSE ALARM BILLINGS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny certification of delinquent false alarm billings to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: • The City currently has six delinquent false alarm bills totaling 727.50. These items are in order for certification to the County. ATTACHMENTS: • Delinquent account list; pages s title WP.. For certification for Delinquent False Alarms: Property Identification Number Total Principal 10-14388-010-01 $ 107.50 10-45001-010-01 $ 190.00 10-22472-092-02 $ 107.50 10-77100-080-20 $ 107.50 10-18501-010-01 $ 107.50 10-22500-150-05 $ 107.50 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS B. ASSESSMENT ROLL OF DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLINGS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny certification of delinquent utility accounts to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: • The City currently has approximately 278 delinquent utility bill accounts. The total amount of the delinquent accounts is $50,897.01. These items are in order for certification to the County. ATTACHMENTS: • Delinquent account list; pagesS, through . se PROCEDURE EXECUTION INFORMATION Procedure name: CERTREPTA(UBONLN.EA) User: MARYANN,UB.EA,UBONLN Custom user profile: $UB Run date: 26-APR-2001 Started at: 11:01:37.1 Finished at: 11:01:46.4 Elapsed time: 00:00:09.3 CPU time: 00:00:01.0 Records read: 911 Records selected: 275 Records written: 278 Selection values: AMT-OPEN : NE .00 S7 REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1020530003 101670132007 171.75 AC 196.75 1030330304 101670106005 229.00 AC 254.00 1030930003 101670107002 147.54 AC 172.54 1031110803 101670116004 233.98 AC 258.98 1040250104 101670129001 205.18 AC 230.18 1040290703 101670125001 337.50 AC 362.50 1040450702 101670109001 249.63 AC 274.63 1041070205 101670308002 186.30 AC 211.30 1050380303 108460001004 102.72 AC 127.72 1050430607 108460003003 .98 AC 25.98 1050620204 108460019003 125.75 AC 150.75 1051120204 108460005002 90.55 AC 115.55 1060110202 103230011000 252.62 AC 277.62 1060650701 102488021005 216.57 AC 241.57 1061120002 102488011003 208.71 AC 233.71 1061241402 101640014100 127.66 AC 152.66 1070390801 108435120002 122.06 AC 147.06 1070670305 108435302003 367.36 AC 392.36 1080250203 108435018002 310.63 AC 335.63 1090070201 108435408001 230.62 AC 255.62 1090510702 108435417003 180.07 AC 205.07 1091040401 108425021001 1.02 AC 26.02 1091050304 108425020001 257.83 AC 282.83 1091290506 108425015003 128.59 AC 153.59 1100050201 108460105008 242.51 AC 267.51 1101160804 108460205005 96.53 AC 121.53 1101440404 108460114007 62.21 AC 87.21 158 REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1110530103 108460232002 107.14 AC 132.14 1111080603 108460232001 90.69 AC 115.69 1111190309 108460221001 121.81 AC 146.81 1111590401 104725129001 247.01 AC 272.01 1140500803 108435518003 117.65 AC 142.65 1140750901 108435520004 41.32 AC 66.32 1150620101 108425107004 226.76 AC 251.76 1160320603 101775014002 275.63 AC 300.63 1162270101 107120003002 225.93 AC 250.93 1162271901 107120003003 111.15 AC 136.15 1170010102 104805002801 37.61 AC 62.61 1170590202 104805007002 89.02 AC 114.02 1171340102 104805010101 201.48 AC 226.48 1171430002 104805009201 81.58 AC 106.58 1171980402 107297506002 320.09 AC 345.09 1173010801 107297614003 141.05 AC 166.05 1174360602 107297703101 55.87 AC 80.87 1180600702 101350026003 184.45 AC 209.45 1181380502 101350006009 70.04 AC 95.04 1181750905 101350005006 49.05 AC 74.05 1181800201 101350011005 197.76 AC 222.76 1190160002 101500312001 .81 AC 25.81 1190705203 101500402002 226.52 AC 251.52 1200320802 106585019002 284.32 AC 309.32 1200730802 108195016001 350.19 AC 375.19 1200930403 108195005002 143.47 AC 168.47 1201780203 108195005006 113.58 AC 138.58 ~q REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1202220804 107585202001 293.75 AC 318.75 1210070704 101715030002 185.34 AC 210.34 1210100203 101715027002 78.82 AC 103.82 1213450807 105380102102 86.52 AC 111.52 1213520806 105380105102 193.70 AC 218.70 1220010101 106580001001 40.35 AC 65.35 1221570305 105210018002 187.84 AC 212.84 1221790703 105210005001 79.17 AC 104.17 1222180004 105210003005 317.13 AC 342.13 1222530601 105210036004 168.24 AC 193.24 1222800302 105210003006 297.15 AC 322.15 1223460501 102580003001 196.67 AC 221.67 1223880401 102580015002 135.06 AC 160.06 1223920801 102580011102 408.49 AC 433.49 1226260602 102580101004 162.71 AC 187.71 1226680502 102580101005 93.56 AC 118.56 1228067303 105615105003 372.54 AC 397.54 1230250103 103980101007 114.58 AC 139.58 1230660105 103980005002 192.30 AC 217.30 1231130403 103980202006 101.15 AC 126.15 1231460504 103980301002 67.41 AC 92.41 1231510703 103980301003 175.40 AC 200.40 1231760803 103980302009 106.72 AC 131.72 1243010402 104507101002 116.47 AC 141.47 1250460103 107595004002 158.15 AC 183.15 1250730701 107595025003 32.60 AC 57.60 1251740502 107595134001 103.06 AC 128.06 &D REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1260120904 101660001201 121.90 AC 146.90 1260440103 101660105003 137.18 AC 162.18 1260470805 101660102003 204.75 AC 229.75 1260830306 101660204001 173.72 AC 198.72 1260880802 101660209001 218.00 AC 243.00 1261000202 101660208202 131.29 AC 156.29 1261120806 101660202102 156.11 AC 181.11 1261180206 101740014400 94.24 AC 119.24 1261380803 101740016300 94.86 AC 119.86 1261550605 101740019400 67.13 AC 92.13 1261810406 101740016800 71.68 AC 96.68 1261970602 101740105001 111.20 AC 136.20 1261980503 101740106001 164.05 AC 189.05 1262260103 101740005201 204.28 AC 229.28 1262310401 101740008201 40.54 AC 65.54 1262480503 101740221102 164.25 AC 189.25 1262520802 101740225002 394.41 AC 419.41 1262540602 101740227002 271.62 AC 296.62 1262560405 101740209103 84.18 AC 109.18 1263266704 101740303201 95.90 AC 120.90 1263286504 101740404101 316.94 AC 341.94 1264231001 105220003001 169.48 AC 194.48 1264480305 108395202001 167.82 AC 192.82 1270160301 106398004002 249.90 AC 274.90 1270240303 106398012002 42.34 AC 67.34 1280730104 106398204006 113.83 AC 138.83 1280840807 106398609001 277.48 AC 302.48 [~1 REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1281250902 106398304008 100.88 AC 125.88 1281680705 106398401011 135.00 AC 160.00 1281830802 106398402010 95.47 AC 120.47 1282890104 105675008005 220.54 AC 245.54 1282900801 105675007005 139.24 AC 164.24 1283400801 101375019002 97.92 AC 122.92 1283610203 101375016003 295.95 AC 320.95 1283780301 101375001005 132.57 AC 157.57 1283830605 101375001002 380.41 AC 405.41 1283910603 101375009002 146.20 AC 171.20 1290750704 102275038003 142.64 AC 167.64 1290950304 102275018003 58.96 AC 83.96 1291130103 102275047002 203.65 AC 228.65 1302320501 102560013003 104.28 AC 129.28 1302710702 102560008003 113.12 AC 138.12 1310570501 101230005005 186.18 AC 211.18 1313160202 104433010001 107.86 AC 132.86 1313780703 108375018001 150.08 AC 175.08 1314570101 104509211002 4.32 AC 29.32 1317810802 104509406001 72.55 AC 97.55 1318320702 104503004001 131.07 AC 156.07 1318640802 106587020001 153.07 AC 178.07 1318810701 108350013001 323.20 AC 348.20 1319200001 105769003005 292.84 AC 317.84 1321150301 104725347001 72.93 AC 97.93 1321310301 104725301002 320.69 AC 345.69 1322000901 104509603001 171.64 AC 196.64 4a REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1322840801 103350002001 1012.23 AC 1037.23 1323120401 105766204002 296.83 AC 321.83 1323610401 107130003001 68.79 AC 93.79 1550530801 100340003153 16.65 AC 41.65 1551390601 100360001182 16.65 AC 41.65 2310180102 101670001002 17.49 AC 42.49 2310440902 101670027002 83.91 AC 108.91 2310590103 101670004003 112.84 AC 137.84 2310840003 101670001008 109.76 AC 134.76 2311200602 101670008006 167.54 AC 192.54 2320730105 101670002009 59.17 AC 84.17. 2321300206 101670215006 88.85 AC 113.85 2330060102 101665006001 162.11 AC 187.11 2330080901 101665004001 57.17 AC 82.17 2330090802 101665003001 126.27 AC 151.27 2330410805 101670224008 123.06 AC 148.06 2330580803 101670243008 228.64 AC 253.64 2330760602 101670201007 149.17 AC 174.17 2342060704 101430103001 153.77 AC 178.77 2350380802 101670403013 141.96 AC 166.96 2350560502 101670411004 226.59 AC 251.59 2350740301 101670405005 103.65 AC 128.65 2350780905 101670409005 165.99 AC 190.99 2350870803 101670409012 94.92 AC 119.92 2350980502 101670413011 412.47 AC 437.47 2351190004 101670422006 300.28 AC 325.28 2351230406 101670404006 46.62 AC 71.62 ~3 REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 2351250201 101670406006 145.77 AC 170.77 2360150302 101670401007 255.64 AC 280.64 2360390502 101670504003 61.26 AC 86.26 2370130303 101670524006 70.04 AC 95.04 2380360401 101670412010 128.83 AC 153.83 2380880104 101670614002 114.00 AC 139.00 2381060902 101670632002 245.07 AC 270.07 2390010303 100200004177 192.22 AC 217.22 2390050903 101190004001 83.29 AC 108.29 2390620901 101670608010 91.83 AC 116.83 2390960904 101670605008 108.48 AC 133.48 2391100105 101670619008 87.61 AC 112.61 2391210801 101670509009 270.42 AC 295.42 2391940003 103295104009 144.15 AC 169.15 2391960802 103295204006 225.34 AC 250.34 2392110902 103295204010 117.56 AC 142.56 2400480606 107710001011 173.55 AC 198.55 2400540703 107710005010 63.29 AC 88.29 2400650407 107710002012 80.40 AC 105.40 2401100906 107710001003 217.76 AC 242.76 2401250206 107710002008 141.88 AC 166.88 2410760901 101670708008 335.16 AC 360.16 2410900104 101670704006 103.61 AC 128.61 2411250001 101670705003 142.78 AC 167.78 2411350801 101670708004 42.82 AC 67.82 2411470404 101670712004 237.54 AC 262.54 2411850701 101438705002 123.70 AC 148.70 &-*fo q REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 2420020604 107300202005 203.31 AC 228.31 2420160007 107300203009 79.49 AC 104.49 2420380405 107300007020 91.36 AC 116.36 2420540302 107300002014 207.98 AC 232.98 2420720103 107300005007 112.90 AC 137.90 2420740904 107300004006 28.49 AC 53.49 2421080901 107300104014 117.31 AC 142.31 2421090806 107300101014 121.52 AC 146.52 2421650905 107300402002 128.53 AC 153.53 2422360404 101435102002 92.63 AC 117.63 2430220003 107650001008 107.64 AC 132.64 2430290301 107650103001 23.86 AC 48.86 2430910601 107650204010 27.49 AC 52.49 2431270402 107650301014 47.64 AC 72.64 2431420504 107650303001 331.69 AC 356.69 2431730703 107650303008 162.80 AC 187.80 2432450107 105750318003 287.34 AC 312.34 2433070601 108446105003 151.25 AC 176.25 2433380902 108446012001 338.92 AC 363.92 2433510103 108446017002 .56 AC 25.56 2440750401 101130002001 28.00 AC 53.00 2446064404 101417507005 227.77 AC 252.77 2460660003 102190052001 298.77 AC 323.77 2500410207 101499207001 193.92 AC 218.92 2500690901 101499317001 23.67 AC 48.67 2501260002 101499301002 191.18 AC 216.18 2501370706 101499307001 128.399 AC 153.39 i REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 2521330703 101440107002 .82 AC 25.82 2531098802 101910104002 130.91 AC 155.91 2550340001 104445004001 24.90 AC 49.90 2564330502 105836129001 24.99 AC 49.99 3550140201 100100006030 18.54 AC 43.54 3550760702 100080001175 16.91 AC 41.91 3610340603 104490010401 108.93 AC 133.93 3610710004 104130005001 223.48 AC 248.48 3610760508 104130010001 65.37 AC 90.37 3611272002 101815001005 50.17 AC 75.17 3614790804 101815202004 187.29 AC 212.29 3621740403 105530019003 187.60 AC 212.60 3630520902 108140002001 121.23 AC 146.23 3630700702 101830009105 59.62 AC 84.62 3640210504 102096007003 161.23 AC 186.23 3640610604 102096018004 44.73 AC 69.73 3643050201 104465157001 185.48 AC 210.48 3650240902 100030001077 31.70 AC 56.70 3650570902 104775011002 195.68 AC 220.68 3650900805 104775004003 79.50 AC 104.50 3651260601 104775210002 40.04 AC 65.04 3660420502 101560009000 206.80 AC 231.80 3660710904 100380002008 51.82 AC 76.82 3660790101 103200003000 232.29 AC 257.29 3671290901 101550140002 288.68 AC 313.68 3672310402 101550107001 183.93 AC 208.93 3672550501 101550114003 281.57 AC 306.57 REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 3680340101 103299003002 139.47 AC 164.47 3701120203 104506020002 109.49 AC 134.49 3701740701 104506008002 72.90 AC 97.90 3701920503 104506008009 215.94 AC 240.94 3710190401 107250015004 145.18 AC 170.18 3710230804 107250019004 125.65 AC 150.65 3710660601 107250028001 198.07 AC 223.07 3711640702 107250011005 205.96 AC 230.96 3720030003 103090003002 155.50 AC 180.50 3740140301 104503503002 28.95 AC 53.95 3750500502 101827538003 147.25 AC 172.25 3761710701 101499614016 131.89 AC 156.89 3770750203 104507531001 1.28 AC 26.28 3770800502 104507526001 237.60 AC 262.60 3770840101 104507522001 276.20 AC 301.20 3771390601 104507710004 53.21 AC 78.21 3780040603 104508010004 153.40 AC 178.40 3824740901 101840313003 135.52 AC 160.52 3826180601 101460002001 742.31 AC 767.31 3826181401 101460002001 275.03 AC 300.03 3827650701 102246133001 70.23 AC 95.23 3828910401 102880214001 15.28 AC 40.28 3830500902 101179501001 336.65 AC 361.65 3830501701 101179501001 945.79 AC 970.79 42579.82T 1200220003 106585009002 30.44 CB 55.44 1200540102 102210001001 683.00 CB 708.00 67 i REPORT SORTED BY ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT-NUMB PID AMT-OPEN ACCOUNT-STATUS ASSESS-AMT 1221200705 105615003102 70.98 CB 95.98 1242140004 105210114001 42.22 CB 67.22 1316630101 108375101004 28.75 CB 53.75 2310490402 101670022002 55.08 CB 80.08 2340590504 101690102001 472.90 CB 497.90 3710530102 107250015001 58.82 CB 83.82 1442.19 <T> 44022.01 50897.01* W Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS C. ASSESSMENT ROLL OF DELINQUENT WEED CUTTING BILLINGS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve or deny certification of delinquent weed cutting billings to Dakota County for collection with property taxes. FACTS: • The City currently has two delinquent weed cutting bills that total $465.70. These items are in order for certification to the County. ATTACHMENTS: • Delinquent account list on page 7Z) i For certification for Noxious Weed Removal: Property Identification Number Total Principal 10-16725-230-02 $ 137.08 10-13520-010-01 $ 328.62 ~b Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 D. PROJECT 764R SELMARK ADD. HARVEY ADD. BURRVIEW ACRES STREE IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Project 764R (Selmark Addition, Harvey Addition, Burrview Acres - Street Improvements) for a period of 18 months and authorize the preparation of detailed final plans and specifications. FACTS: • The bituminous recycling of the streets within the Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres neighborhood is programmed for 2002 in the City's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (2001-2005) and has been part of the CIP since 1994. • On October 20, 1998, the City Council authorized preparation of a feasibility report to address the scope, cost, schedule and financing of street resurfacing within the neighborhood. • On April 6, 1999, a Public Hearing for Project 764 was held. The City Council later approved the project and authorized the preparation of detailed final plans and specifications. • After the close of the Public Hearing, Council members stated concerns for the street improvements due to the affect of heavy construction equipment from the proposed Cherrywood Knoll development at the end of Chapel Lane. Staff was directed to proceed with the project after the development plans for Cherrywood Knoll and the proposed Crane Creek developments were known in greater detail. • In November 1999, the final plat of Cherrywood Knoll was approved. The construction of the streets and utilities for the development was completed in 2000. • Earlier this year, the final plat of Crane Creek was approved. The construction of the streets and utilities for the development is scheduled for 2001. • On April 17, 2001, an informational neighborhood meeting was held with affected property owners to review the draft feasibility report for the proposed street improvements. Of the 74 notices mailed out, 10 people representing 8 properties attended the informational meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. ISSUES: • The proposed street resurfacing has been scheduled to occur in 2002, after the anticipated completion of the construction of the Crane Creek development. Due to the delay of the street improvements over the past few years, the existing streets have deteriorated to a level in which a greater degree of street rehabilitation is necessary, thus requiring the revision of the street improvements included in the previous feasibility reports. • Minnesota Statute 429 requires the awarding of a public improvement financed in part by special assessments within one year after the close of the Public Hearing for said project unless a different time limit is specifically stated in the motion ordering the improvement. Since the hearing is anticipated to be closed on May 1, 2001, the contract award for the construction of Project 764R will need to be approved by the Council before April 30, 2002 if no different time period is stipulated. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages through. p • Informational Neighborhood Meeting Minutes, pages17 through. 71 r- city of eagan Report for Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements City Project No. 764R Eagan, Minnesota May 2001 File No. 49-98-807 ~a j Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderhk and Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned t=%C_ Principals: Otto G Bonestroo. PE • .b1ar nn , >drv.il,t. PE Glenn R Cook, PG. Rosene Robert G Schunrcht. PE • Jer: y A Bourdor PE c & Cm Anderlil< & Senior Consultants: RCDert w Rc;ene. • Jo,ep^.. An Gen,h, ?E • Richard E ` me ?E ye 1,9. 'b, Susan M. Eberl,n, CPA y Associates Associate Principals: HC.%ord A S.inre.C PE • <eqn A GorCO ?E • Robert P P!:^e c i Richard W. Foster, PE • David C Lo kota, PE. • Rooer; C 2ussek, A.I.A. • Mirk k Hanson. Engineers & Architects htchael ` Rautmann. PE. • Ted K F ?Id PE • Kenneth P Anderson, PE • Marx R PE David A Bonestroo. MB.A. • Sidney P Wdtramscn, PE. L.S • Agnes M. Ring- NB.A. rlanR:r. Offices: St. Paul. St. Cloud. Rochester and Willmar, 101% • MilwauKee, WI Website: wwwbonestrcoacom April 25. 2001 Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55 V) Re: Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements City Project No. 764R BRA File No. 49-98-807 Dear Mavor and Council: Attached is our report for Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres Street Improvements. Proposed utility and street improvements are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss the report. Respectfully submitted. BONEST~ROO. ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES. INC. M(~ik A. Hanson Attachment I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Mark A. Hanson Date: April 25, 2001 Registration No. 14260 Reviewed by: Depa e of Public Works Reviewed by: Finance epartment Date: 4 - 2-`7 - c 3 2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal I Table of Contents 2 Introduction / History 3 Scope 5 Feasibility and Recommendation 5 Figure No. 1 - Location Plan I 6 Discussion Utility ..............................................................................................7 Street 7 Proposed Improvements 8 Cost Estimates 9 Easements and Permits 9 Area To Be Included 10 Assessments 1 1 Assessment Financing Options 12 Revenue Sources 12 Project Schedule 13 Appendix A - Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B - Preliminary Assessment Roll Figure No. 2 - Parcel Identification Figure No. 3 - Proposed Typical Sections !1 Selmtrk. HurveN, Burrview Acres Ad lition Street Intprovenzents 2 INTRODUCTION / MAINTENANCE HISTORY As a part of Eagan's Pavement Maintenance Program. (PMP), the City evaluates streets within the community throughout their life cycle and implements appropriate maintenance strategies. In 1989, a Pavement Management System (PMS) was developed that allowed the City to evaluate the condition of the existing pavement surface for all the streets on a routine basis and schedule timely maintenance. A five-year Capital Improvement Program (CEP) for street rehabilitation was developed from this information. Portions of Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres, and Hoeft Additions have been identified for rehabilitation improvements in 2001. Figure 1, located in the back of this report, illustrates the project location and limits. These additions consist of 32-foot residential roadways constructed in 1970 as part of the adjacent development. Based on the data and engineering strategies available at this time, the City's Pavement Maintenance Program incorporates local and ongoing maintenance strategies with seal coating occurring as needed at 5-7 years, again at 12-14 years, with a bituminous overlay at approximately 20 years. Timely maintenance work, such as bituminous milling and patching. crack sealing and sea] coating have occurred at appropriate intervals during the life of the pavement. These streets have been evaluated several times since 1989 and the field data gathered indicates what maintenance strategies are most appropriate. The City of Eagan's maintenance records indicate that these streets were last seal coated in 1990. This maintenance work has extended the life cycle of the pavement. The most recent maintenance patching that was completed in 1998 only provided a temporary reprieve until the proposed improvements could be constructed. Even with the City's maintenance program, analysis of existing bituminous street surface has indicated that streets have deteriorated to a condition where a bituminous overlay would not be appropriate and replacement of the entire bituminous section would be most cost effective. The City Public Works Department has inspected the utility infrastructure (sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer) in the project area and determined that miscellaneous repair work will need to be completed prior to the new bituminous paving. Selmark, HarveY, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements 3 1 Two neighborhood meetings (March 29' . 1999 and April 17` , 2001) were held with the residents in the Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres Additions prior to preparing this feasibility report. March 291h, 1999 Meeting The first neighborhood meeting was held on March 29`h, 1999. This meeting was held with the TH 55 Frontage Road project. These projects were presented together as it was initially planned to construct both projects at the same time. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss existing conditions and show City standards for improvements in the affected areas. The concerns that were discussed are as follows: ■ Questions on what responsibility the new developments in the area would have towards the project ■ Pedestrian safety, especially near the park ■ With the addition of the Cherrywood Knoll and Crane Creek developments. it is possible to push the project back until these are completely constructed April 17`h. 2001 Meeting The second neighborhood meeting was held on April 17`h, 2001. The purpose of the meeting was to re-introduce the City standards for improvements, discuss the feasibility report, and discuss any further concerns in the affected areas. The concerns that were discussed are as follows: ■ A traffic calming choker constructed in Chapel Lane was discussed. The overall consensus was that the choker is not necessary. ■ The realignment or softening of the two 90-degree turns in Chapel Lane near Burr Oaks Park is not necessary. The construction of high backed curb (B6-18) through this area however, would provide a benefit. ■ A bituminous trail along Burr Oaks Park where the two 90-degree turns are located was felt to improve pedestrian safety. It was asked that this trail be connected to the trails in the park. .Selmark, Hctrre v, Burrs re<< acres Ac/clitiuii Street Improvements 74 4 SCOPE This project provides for the reclamation (blending the existing pavement surface and gravel base for use as new gravel base) and construction of new bituminous surface on approximately 0.9 miles of streets located within the Selmark, Harvey, Burrview Acres, and Hoeft Additions. Figure 2 illustrates the project limits and which parcels of these additions will be affected. Also included for improvements are the replacement of damaged curb and gutter, and the adjustments of the existing sanitary sewer manholes and gate valve boxes. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATIONS This project is necessary to decrease maintenance costs, create a safer driving surface, and increase rideability. This project is cost effective in that the proposed improvement (reclamation) is considerably less expensive that totally reconstructing these streets. The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint in that this type of improvement has been used successfully on other streets throughout the City. This project is in accordance with the Five Year Capital Improvement Plan (2001-2000 for the City of Eagan and the schedule as outlined in the Pavement Maintenance Program. It is recommended that: ■ The feasibility report be reviewed by the City Council/Staff and a public hearing be scheduled for May 1 st, 2001. ■ This project, due to its size, be constructed as proposed in this report in combination with other similar type projects in the City, if practical. ■ Street lighting is not included in this proposed project. However, if the residents petition the City for the streetlight improvements, a separate public improvement project can be initiated on it's own schedule and merits. ■ The construction of the improvements be delayed until 2002 due to the anticipated development of Crane Creek and the related construction activities on the local streets within the project area during 2001. Selmark, Harre~, BurniewAcres Addition Street Improvements 77 5 i ~ I HIGH WA y Ho\ w ss APEL LANE ~ 1 ~ II YANKEE DOODLE RD (Co.Rd.-~B) 1 LOCATION PLAN 0 500 1000 Bonestroo SCO" i"'"` 0 Rosene EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 1 Anderlik SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW ACRES STREET IMPROVEMENTS Associates CITY PROJECT NO. 764R -70 Engineers Architects K \49\4999104\Cad_4998B07\dwg\4998807r01.dwg 03/3fIR 1 09 02 31 AM CST 49-98-807 DISCUSSION Utllit~ Utility manhole castings in the street surface will be adjusted and/or replaced as needed to accommodate the new bituminous street surface. Faulty or damaged utility items that have been identified by the Eagan Public Works as in need of replacing will also be addressed as part of this project. Eagan Public Works has reviewed maintenance records and field inspected the existing utility systems for additional repairs and improvements. Street Evaluation The City of Eagan's Pavement Management System allows the City to evaluate the condition of the existing street surface to help schedule timely maintenance and improvements. The Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is a tool used to rank the surface condition for each street. The general categories, which define PCI rankings, are as follows: PCI Pavement Improvement Warranted 56- 100 Routine Maintenance/Crack Sealing/Seal Coat 36 - 55 Patch/Repair and/or Overlay 0-35 Reconstruct The 1999 PCI ranking for the portion of roadways discussed in this report has pavement conditions ranging from 17 to 53 with an average weighted pavement condition of 33. A PCI ranking of 33 falls within the rankings of the "Reconstruct" category. This PCI ranking makes the streets included in this project appropriate candidates for the reclamation type of construction detailed below. The last PCI ratings for the streets in the proposed area was completed in August 1999. Due to the 1-1/2 year time span and the deterioration curve the ratings have decreased substantially to a point where replacement of the entire bituminous section is warranted. Selmark, Harvey, Burrs iew Acres Addition Street Improvements 7 7~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The proposed street improvements arc shown on Figure No. 3. The existing street section con>ists of approximately 2-3- of bitunllnoLls surface supported by a 3 to 6" gravel base. The existing bituminous surface, along with 3" to 4- of the ,ra\el base will be reclaimed (which involves grinding, mixing and processing in place) to a depth of approximately 6". i'll II Ticture I - Typical Bituminous Recycling Operation This reclaimed material will be left in place on the street and used as gravel base beneath a new 2" base course and a I" wear course bituminous pavement. The new pavement, combined with the reclaimed material as gravel base, will provide a street section consistent with current Cith standards for a residential street. The combination of reclamation and new pavement will not eliminate cracking due to the temperature extremes experienced in Minnesota. Routine maintenance will still need to continue under the Citv's Pavement ?Management Program. S~cilli r". [fillI Bm-nrc~u ,9,res.111i~rnrStmtlny~96 elit.) b' The 90-degree turns that exist on Chapel Lane was discussed at the informational meeting. For increase safety in the adjacent park, the mountable curb and gutter in the 90-degree turns will be removed and replaced with B618 (high back) curb. A bituminous trail will be constructed in this area also. This will keep pedestrian traffic off the roadway in the tight turning area of Chapel Lane. An ornamental fence barrier between the trail and roadway was also asked to be included as part of this project Damaged curb and gutter will be replaced if severely cracked, spalled, or settled. It is estimated that approximately 15% of the existing concrete curb will have to be replaced. COST ESTIMATE A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report, which is also summarized below. The total estimated project cost for street improvements is $316,400, which includes 5 percent contingencies and 30 percent indirect costs. Indirect costs include administrative, engineering, construction interest, and legal expenses. Street Resurfacing $221,400 Curb and Gutter repairs $65,000 Utility Improvements $30,000 Total Contract Amount $316,400 EASEMENTS AND PERMITS All work will be completed in the public right-of-way. No additional easements will be necessary. Permits are required from the Minnesota Department of Transportation for work done within their right of way. Selmurk. Hurvev, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements y I AREAS TO BE INCLUDED Burrview Acres Selmark 020-00 Block 1, Lot 1 030-00 Block 1, Lot 2 040-00 Block 1, Lot 3 050-00 Block 1, Lot 4 060-00 Block 1, Lot 5 070-00 Block 1, Lot 6 080-00 Block 1, Lot 7 090-00 ` Block 1, Lot 8 100-00 Block 2, Lot 1 110-00 Block 2, Lot 2 120-00 Block 2, Lot 3 130-00 Block 2, Lot 4 140-00 Block 3, Lot 1 150-00 Block 3, Lot 2 170-00 Block 3, Lot 3 171-00 Block 3, Lot 5 181-00 Block 3, Lot 6 190-00 Block 3, Lot 8 201-00 Block 3, Lot 9 Harvey Add Block 3, Lot 10 Block 1, Lot 1 Block 3, Lot 11 Block 1, Lot 2 Block 3, Lot 12 Block 1, Lot 3 Block 3, Lot 13 Block 1, Lot 4 Hoeft Add Block 1, Lot 6 Block 1, Lot 2 Harvey Add No. 2 Block 1, Lot 3 Block 1, Lot 1 Block 1, Lot 4 Block 1, Lot 2 Auditors Subdivision #38 Block 1, Lot 3 Parcel 010-08 Block 1, Lot 4 Parcel 020-08 Block 1, Lot 5 Parcel 030-08 Block 1, Lot 6 Parcel 040-08 Block 1, Lot 7 Parcel 050-08 Block 1, Lot 8 Parcel 050-10 Block 1, Lot 9 Block 1, Lot 10 Block 1, Lot 11 Block 1, Lot 12 Block 1, Lot 13 To be assessed as 38 town home units. See proposed assessment for assessment policy Sclnwrk, Hanvev, Burrvietir Acres Addition Street Improvenzenls 10 AO.% ASSESSMENTS Assessments are proposed to be levied against the benefited properties for the improvement with costs allocated in Accordance with the City of Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for street improvements for local residential streets. All assessments will be revised based on final costs. A preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix B. Street Resurfacing - Recycle Assessment Ratio Property City Bituminous Street Resurfacing, 0 Low Density Residential (R-1, 2,3) 759. 259e Repair Concrete Curb & Gutter 0% 100% Utility Improvements and Adjustments 09e 100% Residential Lots All residential equivalent properties (69 total) having driveway access on to the streets to be improved are proposed to be assessed. The City Assessment Policy states that 75% of the bituminous street improvements costs are assessable for residential properties and are based on a normal residential width street (32 feet wide). The estimated cost per residential lot to be assessed based on the City Assessment Policy is 51,700/lot and is calculated as follows: 1) [221,400 (Bituminous Street Cost)] x 75% = $166,000 2) $166,000 (Total Residential Assessment) = $1,700 / lot 97.5 `I ) Residential Lot Equivalents Town Home Units All R-3 residential properties having access to streets within the project area are proposed to be assessed based on areas with frontage to the streets common to the townhouses / condos. The City's assessment policy states that 75% of the costs are assessable to these residential properties based on a normal residential width street (32 feet wide). The estimated cost for town home units are calculated as follows: 1) $1700 / lot x 75% = S 1.275 / Town Home Unit 69 homes + (38 Town Homes x .75) = 97.5 Residential Lot Equivalents Selmark, Hurce v, Burrvicii Acres Addition Street Improvements Abn Q~,J ASSESMENT FINANCING OPTIONS The property owner will have the option at the time of the assessment hearing to pay the full assessment or include the assessment in with their property tax statement. If the assessment is included with the property tax statement, the assessment will be spread over 10 years with the interest determined by the results of the bond sale used to finance the improvements. The following payment schedule will result based on an estimated 7% interest for the assessed amounts: Single Family Residential Lot = $1,700 Town Home Unit = $1,277 Single Family/Town Home Principal/Year Interest/Year Cost/Year Cost/Month 151 Year $170/$128 S]19/$90 $260/S218 S22/S18 10`s Year S170/S128 S12/S9 S182/S137 S15/ 11 REVENUE SOURCES Revenue to cover the cost of this project is as follows: Project Cost Assessment Balance Revenue Street Improvements 221,400 166,000 -55,400 Repair Curb & Gutter 65,000 0 -65,000 Utility Improvements 30,000 0 -30,000 $316,400 $166,000 -$150,400 Total Balance The City's Major Street Fund ($120,400) and Utility Trunk Funds ($30,000) will finance the estimated project deficit of $ 150,400 (479c of project total). Selmark, Haney, Burrvieii Acres Addition Street Improvements 12 V1 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report April 3, 2001 Public Hearing May 1, 2001 Approve Plans and Specifications December, 2001 Open Bids/Award Contract February. 2002 Final Completion August, 2002 Assessment Hearing November, 2002 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 2003 Seinzark, Harvey, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements 13 05 Pft- city of aagan Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW ACRES - STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 764 BRA FILE NO. 49-98-807 Bituminous Street Improvement Item Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Est. Cost Mobilization LS 1 2,500.00 $2,500.00 Traffic Control LS 1 2,500.00 $2,500.00 Reclaim Bit. Pavement/ Gravel Base 6" Depth Sy 21,500 1.50 $32,250.00 Remove Reclaimed Material Material (1") LV CY 700 5.00 $3,500.00 Type 32 Base Course Mixture TN 2,400 31.00 $74,400.00 Type 41 Wear Course Mixture TN 1,200 33.00 $39,600.00 Bituminous Material for Tack GL 1,100 1.50 $1,650.00 Adjust Gate Valve Box EA 8 150.00 $1,200.00 Adjust Frame and Castings (MH) EA 15 200.00 $3,000.00 Water for Dust Control MG 100 10.00 $1,000.00 Street Sweeper w/ pickup HR 8 75.00 $600.00 Subtotal $162,200.00 +5% Contigencies $8,100.00 $170,300.00 +30% Indirect Costs $51,100.00 Total Street $221,400.00 Repair Existing Curb and Gutter Item Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Est. Cost Remove Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 1500 4.00 $6,000.00 D412 Concrete Curb and Gutter LF 800 12.00 $9,600.00 B618 Curb and Gutter LF 700 10.00 $7,000.00 Ornamental Fence LF 350 30.00 $10,500.00 Adjust Frame, Ring, and Casting (CB) EA 8 200.00 $1,600.00 Sod w/ 4" Topsoil SY 400 5.00 $2,000.00 8' Bituminous Trail, (6" class 5 & 2" Bit.) SY 200 8.00 $1,600.00 Bituminous Material for Drwy Patch SY 80 15.00 $1,200.00 Concrete Valley Gutter w/ reinforcing SY 210 40.00 $8,400.00 Subtotal $47,900.00 +5% Contigencies $2,400.00 $50,300.00 +30% Indirect Costs $14,700.00 Total Curb and Gutter $65,000.00 Utility lmrovements Item Unit Est. Qty Unit Price Est. Cost Repair Ex. Curb Box and Stop EA 18 300.00 $5,400.00 F. and I. 48" MH Cone Section EA 1 750.00 $750.00 Remove Ex. Catch Basin EA 7 250.00 $1,750.00 F. and I. Catch Basin (2x3 w/ casting) EA 7 750.00 $5,250.00 F. and I. 1'- 48" MH Barrel Section EA 2 700.00 $1,400.00 MH Castings (San. Swr) EA 5 250.00 $1,250.00 Remove 12" RCP LF 144 5.00 $720.00 F. and I. 12" RCP Cl. 5 LF 144 25.00 $3,600.00 R&R Gate Vale Box (full depth) EA 3 350.00 $1,050.00 Replace Gate Valve Top Section EA 4 200.00 $800.00 Subtotal $21,970.00 +5% Contigencies $1,100.00 $23,070.00 +30% Indirect Costs $6,930.00 Total Utility $30,000.00 Total Project Cost $316,400.00 k:\49\4998807\word\AppendixA.xls Q city of Cagan Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll APPENDIX B SUMMARY PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW ACRES- STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY PROJECT NO. 764 BRA FILE NO. 49-98-807 Parcel Equivalent Assessment Parcel Description Address Lots Per Lot Total Burrview Acres 020-00 515 Chapel Lane 2 $1,703.08 $3,406.15 030-00 525 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 040-00 535 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 050-00 545 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 060-00 555 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 070-00 565 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 080-00 575 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 090-00 585 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 100-00 595 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 110-00 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 120-00 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 130-00 580 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 140-00 570 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 150-00 540 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 170-00 530 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 171-00 526 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 181-00 524 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 190-00 520 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 201-00 510 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Selmark Block 1, Lot 1 3235 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 2 3239 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 3 3245 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 4 3255 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 5 3259 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 6 3265 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 7 3275 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 8 3290 Dodd Lane 28.5 $1,703.08 $48,537.69 Block 2, Lot 1 611 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 2, Lot 2 617 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 2, Lot 3 625 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 2, Lot 4 629 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 1 610 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 2 614 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 3 616 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 5 620 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 6 622 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 8 607 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 9 611 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 27.5 lot equivalents is 75% of the 38 town homes on Lot 1, Block 8 Selmark. ~9 . Block 3, Lot 10 615 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 11 625 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 12 626 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 3, Lot 13 624 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Hoeft Add Block 1, Lot 2 642 Rita Court 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 3 618 Sally Circle 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 4 603 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Harvey Add Block 1, Lot 1 3216 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 2 645 Rita Court 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 3 3220 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 4 646 Rita Court 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 070-00 640 Rita Court 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Harvey Add No. 2 Block 1, Lot 1 620 Chapel Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 2 3309 Wren Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 3 3317 Wren Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 4 3325 Wren Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 5 3326 Wren Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 6 3318 Wren Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 7 3310 Wren Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 8 3311 Roll Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 9 3319 Roll Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 10 3327 Roll Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 11 3328 Roll Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 12 3320 Roll Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Block 1, Lot 13 3312 Roll Lane 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Auditor's Subdivision #38 Parcel 010-08 3209 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Parcel 020-08 3213 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Parcel 030-08 3217 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Parcel 040-08 3221 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Parcel 050-08 3225 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Parcel 050-10 3205 Random Road 1 $1,703.08 $1,703.08 Totals 97.5 $166,050.00 27.5 lot equivalents is 75% of the 38 town homes on Lot 1, Block 8 Selmark. q D 1 . city of eagan Figures 91 f i II 050-10 HARVEY ADDN. 0 0 o c RITA COURT Zo, HOEFT ADDN. 'EIli R ~D o L ~ J 3 z Quo ~,oQ J SA Y 1 Q~Qe O~c,~ j 4 BURRVIEW ACRES 2 0° c° C CSC G~ ~ kyi -12 I Z CHAPEL LANE Z~ ,i " c c o ~ o ~ 11C ~^k./v 1~ y ?O 1 CHAPEL NE ZO - I ~ CITY PARK PROPERTY HARVEY ADDN. NO. 2 ROLL LANE WREN LAN Project Limits / Assessment Area N 0 Z10 400 Scale in feet PARCEL IDENTIFICATION Bonestroo NEW Rosene A EAGAN, MINNESOTA FIGURE 2 "\i a 4 Associates SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW ACRE STREET IMPROVEMENTS Engineers & Architects CITY PROJECT NO. 764R K \49~49991u4\Cad_49988C".dwg~4999SC?rO2 dwg C , 01/200'. 0911 14 AN! CST 49-98-807 R Existing Curb Existing Bituminous Pavement, 2"-3" Existing Gravel Base, 3"- 6" EXISTING SECTION No Scale RECLAIMED STREET TYPICAL SECTION Reclaim Bit. Pavement & 3" Reclaimed Material Concrete Curb New Bituminous Wear Course, 1" New Bituminous Base Course, 2" Reclaimed Material Base, 6" NEW SECTION No Scale TYPICAL SECTIONS Bonestroo 0 Rosene FIGURE 3 Anderlik EAGAN, MINNESOTA Associates SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW ACRES STREET IMPROVEMENTS Engineers 8 Architects CITY PROJECT NO. 764R Ad I K:\49\4999104\Cod_4998807\dwg\49988C7r03 dwg 03/ /2001 09:26:45 A9 CST 49-98-807 INFORMATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING MINUTES PROJECT 764R, SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW APRIL 17, 2001, 6:30 P.M. Attendance: Russ Matthys, City Engineer; Kevin Kimmes and Mark Hanson, Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates (BRAA); 10 persons representing 8 properties. A. Welcome and Introduction • City Engineer Russ Matthys welcomed the property representatives. B. Presentation of Project Details • Kevin Kimmes presented the Feasibility Report. C. Questions/Comments 1. Why don't new people from new developments have to pay for new streets? State law special assessments only against properties directly adjacent to street. 2. What about all the hauling that occurred on Chapel Lane, doesn't developer have to pay? Cherrywood Knoll paid about $45,000. 25% of cost picked up by City to address additional driver usage. 3. Will road be higher than it is now? No, curb will stay in place. 4. What is criteria of curb replacements? Visual inspection, settling of sections and cracked curb. 5. Do you anticipate mail boxes being relocated? No. 6. Will you reclaim all streets? Yes. 7. Where is the choker proposed? Possibly at current choker location. What about pedestrians? We could build trail around choker to get pedestrians off narrow street. 8. Need to build trail at choker. 9. Currently cars parked at narrow portion of street act as choker. Don't need to spend $10,000. 10. Leave 90 degree corners as is, but install 6" curb throughout to keep cars on street and not in park or residents' yard. 11. Need signs to denote Crane Creek entrance and pedestrian crossing. Need to put trail on park side at 90 degree curve for children. 12. Who pays for extension of driveways if redo 90% area? City cost. 13. Two years ago assessment was $1200, now it's $1700. Why? Cost estimate similar. but assessment policy is 50% for overlays; now 75% for reclamation. 14. Will poor soil below bad curb sections be replaced and to what depth? Yes, up to 18" as needed. 15. How much will assessments actually cost if I allow to go all 10 years? About $2350. 16. What do we do at Council meeting? Comment about project, concerns and support. 17. Will construction activities be limited during such rush hour times? Contractor must allow access to properties at all times. 18. What will be construction activity schedule for removal? Once machine moves in for reclamation, it will grind up all streets at that time. 19. Mark park side of curb between trail and curb with post and chain with reflector. Staff will review what would be most appropriate and include with project. 20. Pave all trail within park. Cannot incorporate with project. Would be a park improvement. You may let Council know about your desire at public hearing. G:Russ/M i st/M i nutes/Proi.764R/Sel mark.4-17-01 i NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SELMARK, HARVEY, BURRVIEW ACRES ADDITIONS PROJECT 764R TUESDAY, APRIL 17, 2001 - 6:30 P.M. NAME ADDRESS 3. C ti, Ct--l Lay z 6. 7. /1t,_ 8. ilk CC' j L:4'E 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. G: FORMS/SIGN-IN.Sheet Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 E. PROJECT 806, KENNERICK ADDITION (POND HDP-1) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Project 806 (Kennerick Addition, Pond HDP-1- Trunk Storm Sewer Outlet), authorize the preparation of detailed final plans and specifications and the acquisition of easements through the quick-take eminent domain process, if necessary. FACTS: • On May 16, 2000, the City Council adopted the Public Works Department's 5-Year Capitol Improvement Program (2001-2005) including the construction of a storm sewer outlet for Pond HDP-1 in 2001. This schedule anticipated the development of the proposed Kennerick Addition. • On September 15, city staff received a petition signed by Brad Swenson, developer of the Kennerick Addition, and Eileen Kennedy, 1415 Lone Oak Road, requesting the installation of a storm sewer outlet for Pond HDP-1 on the north side of Lone Oak Road (County Road 26), west of Pilot Knob Road (County Road 31). • On October 3, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report 'identifying the scope, cost, financing and schedule of the construction of a storm sewer outlet for Pond HDP-1 to serve the proposed Kennerick Addition and additional adjacent properties. • On April 18, 2001, an informational neighborhood meeting was held with affected property owners to review the draft feasibility report for proposed storm system improvements. 17 people representing 16 properties attended the informational meeting. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. • On April 24, City staff received a petition from 21 residents representing 19 properties opposing the proposed trunk storm sewer assessments. Staff has also received individual letters of objection. ISSUES: • On April 24, City staff also received a petition from those same residents requesting the study of an alternative that would provide for storm ponding entirely within the Kennerick Addition and entirely eliminate an outlet pipe extension. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, pages through • Informational Neighborhood Meeting Minutes, pages[ through/0. • Petition from property owners regarding Project 806, pages( through 130 • Petition from property owners regarding alternative study, pages through I.W. • Letter from property owner, page_ . l7 W "jam I t~ city of enc~en Report for Kennerick Addition Storm Sewer Improvements City Project No. 806 Eagan, Minnesota April 2001 File No. 49-00-111 q3 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Bonestroo Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G Borestroo. PE • Marvm Sorval.l. PE • Crrrn e Cook, 'E. Rosene Robert G SChunKht. PE • Jerry A Bourdon PE. Anderlik & Senior Consultants: Robert W Rosene • Joseph C Anderlik. 'E • R cnard E T- 'E Susan ,M EDerlin, CPA. ` Associates Associate Principals: Ho-rd A. Sanrord. PE • Kertn A Gordon. PE. Robert R Pre `rer.e 'E e Richard Ur Foster, PE • David O. Loskota, PE • Robert C. Russel,, A I.A. • Mirk A. Hanson. 'Engineers & Architects Michael T Rautmabr. PE • Ted K ` elC, PE • Kenneth P Anderson PE • Mark R Roll's, PE David A Bonestroo. ,M 8 A • Sidney P Williamson. PE, L S. • Aores M Ring. V.B A Allan R ?L April 24, 2001 Offices: Sc Paul. St Cloud. RoChester and'Xillmar, YIN • Milwaukee W! Website: wwwbonestroc co, Mayor and City Council City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Kennerick Addition Storm Sewer Improvements City Project No. 806 BRA File No. 49-00-111 Dear .Flavor and Council: Attached is our report for Kennerick Addition Storm Sewer Improvements. Proposed utility improvements are presented and discussed within the report along with detailed cost estimates and a preliminary assessment roll. We will be pleased to meet with the Council and other interested parties at a mutually convenient time to discuss the report. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Mark A. Hanson Attachment I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. [ad 4. Mark A. Hanson Date: April 24, 2001 Registration No. 14260 u'~ Reviewed by: F Depa nt of Public Works Reviewed by: 1--.-- Financ Department Date: 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 • 651-636-4600 • Fax: 651-636-1311 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter of Transmittal 1 Table of Contents 2 Scope 3 Figure No. I - Location Plan 4 Neighborhood Meeting 5 Recommendation .........................................................................................6 Feasibility Necessity and Cost Effectiveness 7 Discussion 8 Easements and Permits ..................................................................................9 Cost Estimate 10 Areas To Be Included 1 I Assessments 12 Revenue Sources 13 Project Schedule 14 Appendix A - Preliminary Cost Estimate Appendix B - Preliminary Assessment Roll Figure No. 2 - Existing Conditions C t7 Figure No. 3 - Proposed Storm Sewer and Contributing Drainage Area Figure No. 4 - Pond & Plantings Figure No. 5 - Assessable Area Figure No. 6 - Easements Selmurk, Hurve}', Burrview Acres .Addition Street Improvements ~J~~ SCOPE This project provides for the construction of a trunk storm sewer outlet pipe from Pond HDP-1 to Skyline Road. Pond HDP-1 is located north of Lone Oak Road and east of Lone Oak Lane (See Figure 1). Pond HDP-1 is a land-locked pond with no storm sewer pipe outlet. Pond HDP- I is located in Zehnder Acres, which was platted when Eagan was a township. Seven (7) residential homes abut Pond HDP-1. Eagan's Stormwater Management Plan (SNIP) provides for the storm sewer outlet pipe from Pond HDP-1 be constructed north to Skyline Road. The pond outlet pipe is recommended at this time to comply with Eagan's SNIP and the proposed Kennerick Addition. A water quality pond is also proposed to be constructed southeast of Pond HDP-I as part of this project. which will satisfy water quality requirements for Kennerick Addition and the abutting drainage areas along Lone Oak Road. Kennerick Addition is an 8-acre plat including 17 single-family lots. Storm water runoff from the proposed Kennerick Addition will ultimately discharge its storm water to Pond HDP-1. Water quality requirements for Kennerick Addition will be satisfied by constructing a water quality pond southeast of Pond HDP-I as part of this project. In addition, pond cleaning. plantings, and wetland restoration is proposed for Pond HDP-1. Selmark, HarveY, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements O Z ROAD 5z] 1: POND HP-11 PO D ~HD -1 i 01 J o k L ON OA RD } 0. ( S 26) PROPOSED KENNERICK ADDITION Q N ~ J 1 FT 0 250 500 Scale in feet ::j Ll -T--EI-7 LOCATION PLAN JA Bonestroo Rosene ME= CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE 1 Anderlik a KENNERICK ADD. POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Associate:; Engin_er. a Ar_hih_a. CITY PROJECT No. 806 K\49\4900111\Cnd\ciwg\4900111RIOl.dwg 04/24/2001 04-58-24 PM CDT 4900111R101.DWG APRIL 2001 49-00-111 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (April 18, 2001) The public improvements proposed herein were presented to the existing residents at the neighborhood meeting on April 18, 2001. The residents' input is summarized below: ■ The storm sewer outlet pipe from Pond HDP- I provides no benefit for the existing residents because it's not required to serve their property. ■ Assessments are not justified. If assessments are levied, they should be deferred. ■ Property owners to the north expressed concern that the new storm sewer alignment must conform to future development. At this time potential development layouts have not been prepared. However, two property owners did indicate they have been considering possible development. ■ The property owner abutting Lone Oak Road felt the westerly cross culvert in Lone Oak Road should extend and be directed to the proposed water quality pond. ■ Property owners suggested two alternatives be further reviewed: 1) Construct storm sewer outlet pipe from Pond HDP-1 in Lone Oak Road ROW to the west and discharge to the open ditch in Lone Oak Road. 2) Kennerick Addition provide its own ponding and construct its own storm sewer pipe outlet to Skvline Road. Single-family lots located in the westerly end of Kennerick Addition would be removed to accommodate stormwater ponding. Engineering staff responded to the property owners alternatives as follows: ■ Eagan's Stormwater Management Plan has always planned for the pond outlet pipe for Pond HDP-1 to be constructed north to Skyline Road. Existing storm water facilities in Skyline Road and north through the Hayes/Delost Ravine have been constructed to account for storm water flow from Pond HDP-1. ■ A storm sewer pipe in Lone Oak Road could not discharge into the existing roadside ditch without causing significant erosion and damage to abutting property. Therefore, the storm sewer pipe would need to be constructed to TH 13 (2600' vs. 1200' as proposed herein). In addition, the existing storm sewer facilities in Mn/DOT ROW have not been designed to account for storm water flow from Pond HDP-1 ■ Ponding in Kennerick Addition and an independent storm water outlet pipe to Skyline Road would reduce the drainage area and stormwater flow to Pond HDP-1. Thereby reducing the stormwater and around water recharge to Pond HDP-1. Se /mark, HarreY, Burn iew Acres Addition Street Improvements 5 RECOMMENDATIONS ■ The feasibility report be reviewed by the City Council/Staff and a public hearing be scheduled for May 1", 2001. Present Feasibility Report April 3, 2001 Public Hearing May 1. 2001 Approve Plans and Specifications June 19, 2001 Open Bids/Award Contract July 17, 2001 Final Completion October, 2001 Assessment Hearing February. 2002 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 2003 ■ Wetland restoration, plantings, and pond cleaning/grading for Pond HDP-1 shall comply with Eagan requirements and the Wetland Conservation Act. ■ Easements (ponding/utility) be established over Pond HDP-1, water quality pond. and the storm sewer outlet pipe to Skyline Road. Pond easements for Pond HDP-I be acquired to the 1 % high water level (100-vear HWL). Pond easements for Pond HDP- I 1 located south of Skyline Road would not be acquired at this time, but when the abutting land develops when the ultimate pond configuration can be determined. ■ Assessments proposed herein are in accordance with Eagan's Special Assessment Policy for access to trunk storm sewer. Pond credit to the 1% HWL has been applied to those parcels abutting Pond HDP-1 assuming pond easements are acquired. Assessments shall be further reviewed based on benefit. ■ Water quality requirements for Kennerick Addition shall be their cost responsibility. ■ The stormwater alternatives suggested by the residents could be reviewed further, however the alternatives do not comply with Eagan's Stormwater Management Plan. • The westerly culvert in Lone Oak Road be extended to the water quality pond. • The project can be best carried out as one contract. Sc hnark, Hurve- , Burn test Acres Addition Street Improvements O 6 FEASIBILITY NECESSITY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS The project is feasible from an engineering standpoint and is in accordance with the objectiVeS established in the City's Comprehensive Storm Water Plans. This project is necessary to provide a storm sewer outlet pipe from Pond HDP-1 and allow the development of the proposed Kennerick Addition. This project is cost effective based on existing conditions and acceptable standards proposed to construct the improvements Selmark, Hurve~, Burrvie w Acres Addition Street Improvements ~h 7 DISCUSSION The storm sewer outlet pipe from Pond HDP-1 is proposed to be constructed north to the existing storm sewer pipe in Skyline Road in accordance with Eagan's Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) (See Figure 3). The existing storm sewer facilities in and north of Skyline Road are in place to the Minnesota River in accordance with Eagan's SMP. It is not proposed at this time to develop and acquire the pond easement for Pond HP-11. It's felt the development of Pond HP- 1 1 can best happen when the abutting land develops. It is also proposed, as part of this project, to extend a storm sewer pipe through the rip rap/eroded area north of Lone Oak Road and south of Pond HDP-1. The eroded area would be re-graded and restored. The eroded area has resulted due to overland storm water runoff from the ditches and abutting land along Lone Oak Road (Co. Rd. 26). Existing utilities (sanitary sewer, water main, and storm sewer pipe) are shown on Figure Design criteria for Pond HDP-1 is summarized below: Pond HDP-1 (I % Rainfall) NWL = 859.3 HWL = 864.6 Storage = 6.76 Acre Feet Water quality requirements for Kennerick Addition will be provided by Pond HDP-1.1 southeast of Pond HDP-1. Pond HDP-1.1 will be graded and developed as part of this project in conjunction with wetland restoration and improvements for Pond HDP-1 (See Figure 4). The Kennerick Addition is responsible for water quality requirements to serve its development. Any pond oversize to accommodate storm water runoff along Lone Oak Road outside of Kennerick Addition will be the responsibility of the City. Preliminary design criteria for Pond HDP-1.1 is summarized below: Pond HDP-1.1 NWL = 860 HWL = 863.5 (top berm between Pond HDP-1 and HDP-1.1) Storage = 1.14 Acre Feet Selmurk, Hurvely, Burrriew Acres Addition Street Improvements J EASEMENTS AND PERMITS Permits are required from the Dakota County, and MPDES. A permit will be required from the City of Eagan to verify compliance with the Eagan's Water Conservation Act. Permanent easements are shown on Figure 6 located at the back of this report. The table below shows the required permanent easements from each parcel for storm sewer pipe and Pond HDP- 1. The pond easement for HDP- I is to elevation 864.6 (1 % HWL). Easement Parcel I.D. Number Parcel Address (square feet) Section 4 SE 1/4 Storm Sewer Pipe Easement 10-77250-063-00 1432 Skyline Road 3,402 10-77250-070-00 1450 Skyline Road 4.167 10-77250-100-00 N/A 12.602 Total 20.171 Pond HDP- I Easement 10-88800-091-00 1441 Lone Oak Lane 12,199 10-88800-093-00 1445 Lone Oak Lane 10,837 10-88800-102-00 1455 Lone Oak Lane 7.125 10-88800-104-00 1461 Lone Oak Lane 2,223 10-88800-105-00 1449 Lone Oak Lane 7,576 10-88800-106-00 N/A 8,013 10-88800-107-00 1459'/2 Lone Oak Lane 14,769 60,742 Permanent easements required within the proposed Kennerick Addition and Parcel 10-88800-90- 00 (which is controlled by Kennerick Addition) are not shown above and will be acquired with final plat approval. Selmurk. Harvey, Burrvie tit Acres Addition Street Improvements1b*7 9 1 COST ESTIMATE A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A located at the back of this report, which is also summarized below. The total estimated project cost is $260,000. which includes 109 contingencies and 30 percent indirect costs. Indirect costs include administrative, engineering. construction interest, and legal expenses. Trunk Storm Sewer $185,000 Water Quality Pond (Kennerick Addition) 43,000 Storm Sewer Pipe Easements 20,000 Pond Easements (Pond HDP-1) 12.000 Total Contract Amount $260,000 For purposes of this report. easement costs for the storm sewer pipe north of the proposed Kennerick Addition are estimated at 520,000, while the easement costs for Pond HDP-l are estimated at S 12,000. Scln ark, Hurvev, Burndew Acre. Addition Street Improvements 10 AREAS TO BE INCLUDED Property ID Number Property Address 10-00400-010-78 2975 Pilot Knob Road 10-77250-010-00 2971 Pilot Knob Road 10-77250-01 1-00 1430 Skyline Road 10-77250-012-00 2973 Pilot Knob Road 10-77250-020-00 1410 Skyline Road 10-77250-030-00 1414 Skyline Road 10-77250-040-00 1420 Skyline Road 10-77250-050-00 1426 Skyline Road 10-77250-060-00 1430 Skyline Road 10-77250-061-00 1436 Skyline Road 10-77250-062-00 1428 Skyline Road 10-77250-063-00 1432 Skyline Road 10-88800-010-00 2997 Pilot Knob Road 10-88800-020-00 2987 Pilot Knob Road 10-88800-040-00 1415 Lone Oak Road 10-88800-05 l -00 1425 Lone Oak Road 10-88800-052-00 N/A 10-88800-060-00 1429 Lone Oak Road 10-88800-061-00 1427 Lone Oak Road 10-88800-070-00 1431 Lone Oak Road 10-88800-071-00 N/A 10-88800-072-00 1435 Lone Oak Road 10-88800-090-00 N/A 10-88800-091-00 1441 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-093-00 1445 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-094-00 N/A 10-88800-101-00 1444 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-102-00 1455 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-103-00 1459 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-104-00 1461 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-105-00 1449 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-106-00 N/A 10-88800-107-00 14591/2 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-1 10-00 N/A 10-88800-111-00 1465 Lone Oak Lane 10-88800-1 12-00 1467 Lone Oak Lane Selmark, flcrn•ei. Bnrrrir<< Ac res Ad diiion Sneer Improvements / ~ 11 ASSESSMENTS Storm sewer improvements proposed herein. excluding the water quality ponding for Kennerick Addition are considered trunk. Therefore, assessments are proposed to be levied in accordance with Eagan's Assessment Policy for trunk utilities. The area proposed to be assessed is shown on Figure 5. The trunk area assessments rates are in accordance with Eagan's 2001 Fee Schedule (single family rate @0.088/sq.ft. or S3,833.28/acre). A pond credit is shown for Pond HDP-1 to the 19c high water level (HWL) rainfall event in accordance with Eagan's assessment policy. Properties previously assessed for trunk area storm sewer are not proposed to be assessed. The Preliminary Assessments Roll is presented at the back of this report in Appendix B. Water quality pond improvements for Kennerick Addition are proposed to be assessed to the parcels included within Kennerick Addition on an area basis. Selmurk, Han c i, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improi ements 12 REVENUE SOURCES Revenue to cover the cost of this project is as follows: Assessment Project Cost Revenue Balance Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements $185,000 $144,208 -$40.792 Water Quality Pond 43,000 43,000 - Storm Sewer Pipe Easements 20,000 0 -20,000. Pond Easements 12,000 0 -12,000 Total Balance $260,000 $187,208 -$72,792 The City's Storm Water Utility Fund will finance the estimated project deficit ($72,792). Selnutrk, Harvey, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements 13 1 PROJECT SCHEDULE Present Feasibility Report April 3, 2001 Public Hearing May 1, 2001 Approve Plans and Specifications June 19, 2001 Open Bids/Award Contract July 17, 2001 Final Completion October, 2001 Assessment Hearing February, 2002 First Payment Due with Real Estate Taxes May 2003 Se lm ark, Harvey, Burrview Acres Addition Street Improvements / I 3~ 14 city of cagan Appendix A Preliminary Cost Estimate APPENDIX A PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE KENNERICK ADDITION - STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS CITY PROJECT NO. 806 BRA FILE NO. 49-00-111 Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements Quantity Unit Item Unit Price Total Price 1 LS Mobilization $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 1 LS Clear and Grub $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 4 EA Connect to Existing Storm Sewer $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 8 EA 4' dia Storm Sewer MH, incl R-1642-B Cstg $ 1,500.00 $ 12,000.00 1200 LF 15" RCP Storm Sewer $ 34.00 $ 40,800.00 230 LF 24" RCP Storm Sewer $ 40.00 $ 9,200.00 2 EA Skimmer Structure $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 2 EA 24" RCP Flared End Section, incl Trash Guard $ 1,600.00 $ 3,200.00 50 CY Class III Random Riprap $ 70.00 $ 3,500.00 1 LS Wetland Restoration $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 1 LS Water Quality Pond Oversize $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 1 LS Erosion Restoration (grading) $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 850 SY Seed Mixture 500 w/ Erosion Control Blanket $ 4.00 $ 3,400.00 1 AC Seed Mixture 500 w/ Fertilizer $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 1050 LF Improved Pipe Foundation $ 2.00 $ 2,100.00 Subtotal $ 128,700.00 +10% Contigencies $ 13,300.00 $ 142,000.00 +30% Indirect Costs $ 43,000.00 Total Dodd Road Storm Sewer $ 185,000.00 Water Quality Pond (Kennerick Addition) Quantity Unit Item Unit Price Total Price 1 LS Clear and Grub Tree $10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 3600 CY Common Excavation $ 5.00 $ 18,000.00 0.5 AC Wetland Seed $ 3,000.00 $ 1,500.00 Subtotal $ 29,500.00 +10% Contigencies $ 3,500.00 $ 33,000.00 +30% Indirect Costs $ 10,000.00 Total Dodd Road Storm Sewer $ 43,000.00 city of eac~an Appendix B Preliminary Assessment Roll ~~S w, CD h M T M M M O 0 f- 00 M N Lo f- (D M U') 0 V N N "Cl fl- f-- r M U) = N U) (D (D N N N N r N N N (D 0 N 0 r N 0 0 (O M O O M 0 (D (D lv m666wmc6CDMMDOO(D V NOr`U')OOOM V OOr.- (p (o E MO O U) lr c r v v IT 0~ 0 N M f- O N Mr-- M T O U')0 M N O N w y O C \t r" O O O O O N O M U) M U7 C f~ N U r r M N N O (D O N O IA M r- N M M M M M O Iq M~ M M ~t N fl- 0 Mq, N r N r L(•) N r F y r N r r r y Q f 69 69 69 69 64 69 69 69 69 64 60, 69 64 64 64 64 6F) 64 64 69 d4 64 64 613, el, EA 69 w r+ co O co 0) 'IT O O 0 (D (D (D 0) m co E co N r C y oo a) T CO N d n. a) O 0 CD M w y 3 69 69 bq 64 69 w U? IL( Lq U! LMC) ItT I Q'C V O O O O 0 CL m 669 6~9 664 613, ~ 3 ~ CD t- M r 00 OD 00 CO O f~ CD M N U) M (D M ti 0 T M N 'CT ti~ f-- M Lo m a N 0 (D (D N N N N r N N N CD 0 r 0 N Lo 0 0 0 M 0 M 0 0 (D (D ` y M6O(D0000GOmMMa0m(c4MOM-: 66 6 M46 04 6 (D Q M O O u-) cr cY 0 g 0 N M M a0 O to 0 co r O N tr F- O co CO y w, co N (D ~ 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 Co Lo Co ti 0 t` O (o r N M N N CO ICT (D N J Z W C M t- N M M M M cl O V M f` cM M O N t` C L r ct C \i N N r ~ r r J W 7 U) O w y fn ~ Q 6f36AEA64696A69604 64 69 69 69 64 69 Co 64 64 69 69 69 64 696 f~69696464ER W N CO r ` OOCDCOO0o0oOCOOOCOtOCDCOCOCOaOtOOOCOCOCOCOCOOOCOCONOO in O O V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N tO Q~ p 9 Q Q cvi(MC`)C15ChMM(MMMMMM("OMCMMMMco MM~MMMMCM X y z O Y M co CM co co m ce) m m m m M M M CM co co M co co M M M (M M M M co j z F c as co cococommmcococo00000000OD00cococooowoocomaoco Iom 963 646460 d M9 ~1996M 46M9 ~ z (W 3: O W 0 L. 0: ~~6M9~6 M97 V>~6s6M R6M9~6M46 Ma6 Ma~U9.0 bM M CL ~ V) G o J c~v y Q Q a fy y LO d O co co 00 co M M M N CV M M N f-_ O CO N U') (D CO 00 V r O CO M 00 N Q O Y Ln i L 000CDO O O O OCDr000N0f`Oao00MMr(p~ (D (DM d Q Q r r 0 O r r T r N r r r O O N O N r O r Q O O O O O U) W Z W C~ m Q 2 IL Y C 'a V cN CO N O CTD m a Q o 0 0 0 0 d A V) O 00 CO O M M M M N N M M N t- O m N Lo CD w CO M (D M 0 00 00 V L ~ OOD(DOOOOOCDrOLTC?CACA~ 00000MM V 00f`(D(D~' a Q Q T T O O r r r T N T r r O O N O CV T O r r O r 0 0 0 0 0 mm co m mmm mm m m e c c y T- 0~ m m m m m mmm m co (D co co o o X o o o M m co m co Yco Ym m Y Y c Y c c c c c c c c Y Y 0 0 000 O 00 00 Q - O a) a) a) a) a) Q) O Q) o _o _o _o o c c c c c c m e c c = Y,e Y Y Y Y Y Y Y - O O O O O O C O O O d FL d fn d U) fn fn (n f) U) U) CL CL J J J .J J J J J J J C. 0 M 0 V, 0 (D 0 0 M N f-- f- Lo Lo O f- T Ln T LC) ~ UO L rn m~ m v v v v v v v c m m v Nv a v v v Q v Q I Q v a. N N r N r r T r T r T N N r r z r r r Z T Z r r Z r r IV M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6'r, h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z O O N O O O O O- N M O 0 0' N O- O- CV O r M r N 3 r T T r N M~ 0 CO (0(0 (D r N qT Lo 0 (D O t` f- t` 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O r r >v6666666666666666666666666666 O O Lo Lo UO U) o o Loo o Lo Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d p~ N N N N N N N N N N N O 00 O m CD CD 00 m w 00 m a0 a0 a0 w 00 w' O t- f,- 1` t` f- f.- ti f~ f,- N f- 00 m CO 00 O O O CO w w 00 00 m 00 00 O ' O f` f~ f` f` f~ f~ f~ f` f~ f~ f~ 00 a0 a0 00 O QO CO 0 CO CA CA CA CA 00 00 CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A T T T T T T T r r r r r r r r r T T r r r T r r r r r r ti O CO M (D co) 4M C M N O i O7 O O? (D Q! 4) CO co V O O (D I- (D N O W M O V! CO CC CJ CL (D CO N O of U) N N N Q EA 69 643, 69 EA Hn' 69 69 r C O d O 7 E O 0 m a a 3 a" T m L V CY c Q L a Q7 d R~/ 3 ti CO co M (D CO O R C M N O) O O) cD O ` d OO OOC(Dti Q E 1` (D N O O M o w co CO h (O N (D CO CV 19 U) o C U) V U5 N N ~ uJ f Q 69 69 69 69 69 69 EA 69 ~ 47 O O CO O CO O O CO i L, N N N N N N N N Q U M (M cri M M co, M Y C) M M M M M co M C r 00 CC co CO co 00 CO 00 O (0 M M M M M M M (i f 9 69 Efl ~9 Efl Efl EF? 69 d M (4 yC7)r~U)ON000~~ N d L N O M (D 1~ ~ d Q Q 0 0 0 O -66 N Q of ~U7tiOv C i 0 0 r CO d a V Q o 0 o 0 0 d (4 yMNNO(D0007'~ i L i Un M (D 1,- M (D 1,- a Q Q 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 N N C CS L c c c J C C V N M N M J J N J J J ~d„YYY ~ YY ~ (0 (0 t4 O 0 o O p O O O Q N 0(D J C 4) a) C N O J J J ~ J J U7 1- OLo (DvQLo QCD a ~ 00000o00 000000000 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 r-0 0 0 0 o O O o . 00 O co co co co 00 00 W m co co co co O co co co 0 Co Co CO CO Co 00 CO C? C LooooOOOo 1~ city of Cagan Figures ~~6 1~1 9 RQ 9' ~ ~ I I II m I J EXISTING ~7" RCP I STORM SEWER I ❑ 0 \11 POND / EXISTING WETLA D N ✓~Z~J HP DELINEATION S OR - ERP ~l I I 0 too I_oo Scale in feet j ; I EXISTING - - - WATER MAIN I ANT RY SC ER WATER EXISTINM) IN EXI TING WETLAND P ELINEATIOUL EXIS ING RIPRAN - - ° . ER (1 I ION o; "I I I EXI TING 4" RCS-- Lam`; j ST M _SEWER II I EXISTIN I I ~,4"13 P ❑ . I~ ~ ~ I LONE AK RD 1.4 EMER A.H. 6 J~----------- I r- ~ L _ I r r- I I I i I I I 1 1^ - I I I r ~ I ~ I i I I I EXISTING CONDITIONS Borlestroo Rosene CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE 2 WAN Anderlik a KENNERICK ADD. POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS I I Associate-L E1lyine_r; a An-11ir1_,_r, CITY PROJECT No. 806 K1\49\4900111\CAD\dwg\4900111R10Z.dwg 04/24/2001 05100137 PM CDT 49001 1 1 R102.DWG APRIL 2001 r 49-00-111 1 J - _~1 Y tr------- - -_--v. _ 5 I • 4% ~ - - I I ' ~ I ~ c11 ❑ k" 40 - - i i 1 I I I j! ~I I I is III PROPO D WATIO, I I POND-- (C. I p i O R _ ~ HWL 8a4.a I J--- RD (C. S.AJH.; 26) NE OAK TT- A- ' -400 L f-.-_ I 1 I 1 - + - - D IN `OE AREA J I -------J-----WORM SEWER 0 ISO 300 Scole in feet .p li r lr-~^1 PROPOSED STORM SEWER & CONTRIBUTING AREA Bonestroo Ro-ene CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE 3 Anderlik & KENNERICK ADD. POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS A55()bat(--5 El lgm - -r~; :o Archit,_-a~ CITY PROJECT No. 806 / K-\49\4900111\CAD\dwg\4900111R103.dwg 04/24/20C1 05'04121 PM CDT 4900111R103.DWG APRIL 2001 0 49-00-111 y y y o i€ O O C N a S m~aa y N 4 -1-1 wg a ~ 3 = a ~1 a w Y Nn G p. c f1Y VJ ~ S z 000 Z O Q CL J ~ CL zQz ~ ~ a U c z LYw Q U p w w a z Q Z owa z ~w~ 7`• .0 a UYU: ad- ~ ~3 ~ ~ s % A _ r Z 40 rzm= I 1 R~pO J ~ t0.1 AC 107 AC tW AC L03 AC 100 AC S I T ~ 8 $ 8 8 8 I 1 S R R A R I I ~ tt: AC I I Q 1 5 Q 4 e, r L6J AC 0-77250-OIFW IFT723Fg0-00 52 r tY77230-010-00 =-77250-Ot'00 W AC 7-62 AC 0.66 AC I r 8 1 A ro 772WO12-00 J o-ooAOO-o+Fn O.MAC 1.00 Ac 10-60600 / 0.67 Ac I j I I i I I -m-00 0.86 Ac 8 I I 1 I I 0.66 AC 8g 1 1 1 I 5s1 I I i 1.36 AC b. 'b ¢ >z / 1 Q ° 0.65 AC f0-M 07x00 10-14000-060-00 y'C -b, 1.u AC t63 AC O 1 10 10- IA52-00 7p~~ -00 10-8660-0 20-00 0 2 2.02C I 12" AC - 0.67 AC J Led AC _l- k D-6660F10 00 0.74 AC Q 0.76 AC 10-66600-070-00 1 I O S I ^J 10-66600-m-c0 7~AC 10-8660-010--00 10- =M~-~~ tAC 060-00 10-66600-051-00 0.62 AC t3 AC 1Fwoo-0." Ac 0n Ac L ONE OAK RD °f AC (C. S. A. H. 26) I J kk Q O 3 LEGEND - - - ASSESSABLE AREA N o ,50 Seale in feet ASSESSABLE AREA - TRUNK Bonestroo Rosene CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE 5 r~ Anderiik KENNERICK ADD. POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 11 A5sijdates Eliljincer; :4 Ar.- in--AL; CITY PROJECT No. 806 K,\49\4900111\CAD\dwg\4900111R104.dwg 04/24/2001 05,05,50 PM CDT 4900111R104.DWG APRIL 2001 49-00-111 - U U V 1,, - \ , i 1 f J Iu - 1 \ I - - 1 1 PRO OSED ; - „ UTIL EASEMENT I______ r - 1 i 1 ICI 1 ~ 4' it P Y r J ~1 / m o, Q, PRO D 1S li ; N I Ids ~ ~2 LONE OA R PQN U ILIT1( ! C.S.A H.;I 26 1 11 EASEMENT- 1----- - 1-`----~-E- - - - - - - - - - - - - - a- - - - - - - - r- T -fit L dJ 77- _y J l >1 Cz~ - , r~ J 0 150 300 .I - u I-~- - _=c-c- c===== Seale in feet l EASEMENTS REQUIRED Bone-troo Rosene CITY OF EAGAN FIGURE 6 0■ Anderlik KENNERICK ADD. POND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS A55cjciates E1 1ine~r a Arp_hib_ct~, CITY PROJECT No. 806 Ki\49\4900111\CAD\dwg\4900111R105.dwg 04/24/2001 05,06,45 PM CDT 4900111R105.DWG APRIL 200/(~l3 49-00-111 1 KENNERICK ADDITION/ HDP-1 TRUNK STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 806 INFORMATIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD :MEETING APRIL 18, 2001 Attendance: John Gorder, Assistant City Engineer; Mark Hanson and Kevin Kimmes, Bonestroo Engineering; 17 people representing 16 properties (see attached sign-in sheet). A. Welcome and Introduction • Gorder welcomed everyone in attendance and introduced the Bonestroo staff present. Gorder opened the meeting by providing background on the project as it relates to the City's 5-Year CIP and Storm Water Management Plan. B. Presentation of Project Details • Mark Hanson presented the improvement project details including the proposed construction, cost, assessments and schedule. C. Questions/Comments 1. This project does not benefit anyone but the developer of Kennerick Addition. The pond has been fine for years, it does not need an outlet. Why should we pay for any of it? It is the City's policy to assess everyone in the City, regardless of location, for trunk storm sewer system to convey storm water to the Minnesota River. The developer is paying his trunk assessment, also on an area basis, for the Kennerick Addition. Pond conditions change and the infiltration occurring now may not continue in the future. The outlet pipe provides a level of flood control protection around HDP- 1 that does not exist today. 2. Why not run the storm sewer from the pond west down Lone Oak Road to the river? Do you know that cost? We have prepared the draft report and estimated costs based on the City's long-standing Storm Water Management Plan and the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program. The City has never anticipated or planned on directing water down Lone Oak Road. Constructing a storm sewer system down Lone Oak Road would likely cost considerably more. We will mention your suggested alternative in the meeting minutes and the report. If the Council directs staff to consider this alternative, we will prepare a cost estimate at that time. 3. Why not require the developer to put the pond entirely on the Kennerick Addition and run the pipe from there to the north? Again, this would not be in keeping with the Storm Water Management. Also, the development plan that was preliminarily approved by the Council did not show a pond within the site. 4. I own the property along the south edge of the pond. I have some erosion as a result of a culvert under Lone Oak Road. Why aren't you proposing to capture this drainage and pipe it to the pond? That was originally analyzed but was taken out because it was thought that the erosion problem was not that substantial. We can look at putting this stretch of pipe back in the proposed project. 5. The owner of the property to the north around Pond HP-11 near Skyline Road where the pipe is proposed to be constructed stated that he wants input on where the pipe and a possible future street would be constructed. If the project is lay} approved, the Council will direct staff to negotiate easements for the outlet pipe over your property. At that time, staff will work with you on an alignment that can accommodate future development of the property. The alignment is still flexible. 6. Will the proposed water quality pond drain the wetland? No. They will essentially work together. 7. Do you know about the new federal regulations regarding wetland alteration? I understand you can't do anything in a wetland without federal permission. We are aware of the Corps of Engineers regulations and are confident that the proposed improvements meet their permit requirements. 8. We were assessed with Skyline Road. Why are we being assessed again? The assessments associated with Skyline Road were lateral benefit assessments directly associated with that project. The trunk storm sewer assessments now proposed were not paid as part of that project. 9. How do you determine the easement line you need to acquire? It is based on the calculated water level of the pond with a "100-year, 1% probability" storm event that is 6 inches of rain in a 24-hour period. 10. The $12,000 for all the easements seems awfully low. How did you determine that figure? The City bases it on previous similar easement acquisitions. The easements will be negotiated if the Council approves the project. 11. The pond (HDP-1) has been shrinking. Is it going to be dredged? Some wetland restoration involving excavating eroded material out of the wetland is proposed. No excavation beyond that is proposed. 12. How does the Kennerick Addition drainage get to the water quality pond? It will be piped via storm sewer to be constructed by the developer. 13. How many fewer houses in the Kennerick Addition would there need to be to not require this project? That analysis has not been done as the development has preliminary approval and is in accordance with the single-family zoning for the area. 14. Why not have Dakota County take care of its own water from Lone Oak Road? Even when Lone Oak Road is upgraded to an urban section, the storm runoff from the road will likely be directed to Pond HDP-11, as is shown on the drainage boundary maps in the Storm Water Management Plan. 15. Do we have to file a petition to have this project stopped? The Council will hear public testimony at the May 1 public hearing. A petition is not necessary, although you can submit one if you wish. 16. Are you going to show all the costs for the options brought up at this meeting? Staff will prepare cost estimates for those options if directed by the City Council. The only cost estimate we will present to the Council is the one for the proposed project based on long-standing plans. 17. How did some of the property owners affected by other projects that I've seen before the City Council, like Dodd Road, get their assessments deferred? At the project public hearing for Dodd Road, the Council indicated that there may be a reduction in the assessments. That will be decided with the final assessment hearing. It all depends on the Council and how much of the financial responsibility for projects they wish to undertake. 18. What if not all of my property drains to the pond? If a portion of your property drains to the pond and hasn't been previously assessed for trunk storm sewer, all of the property is proposed to be assessed. /dS 19. How does the City determine benefit? This trunk assessment is based on a long- standing rate, adjusted for inflation, determined by the cost of trunk storm sewer improvements spread over the entire area of the city. 20. How can we get copies of your presentation? Copies of the final report that will go to the Council will be available Wednesday, April 25 at City Hall. Meeting adjourned at 8:40 p.m. G:JGNISC Minutes - Kenncrick Addition - April 18 - 01 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING KENNERICK ADDITION PROJECT 806 WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, 2001 - 6:30 P.M. NAME ADDRESS 5. e r r1~ n t eLo 10. 13. 14. 15. q 16. C~ L ~~1 5 r~ 17. 18. 19. 20. GFORMS/SIGN-1 N. Sheet !a7 LJ~ \ G 1 1~L, J RECEIVED AN = 1 '2001 Petition to Oppose Project 806 Kennerick Addition We, the affected property owners oppose Project 806 submitted by the representatives of the Kennerick Addition. In the event that the Storm Sewer Improvement Project (Project 806) is approved, we, the affected property owners, request the Eagan City Council to waive the proposed assessment on affected property owners for the Storm Sewer Improvement Project (Project 806), Kennerick Addition/Pond HDP-1. We also demand that the total cost of Project 806 be paid for by the developer of the proposed Kennerick addition. By signing this document, we hereby direct the Eagan City Council to veto Project 806 (Storm Sewer Improvement/Kennerick Addition.) In the event of passage of Project 806, we, the affected property owners, instruct the Eagan City Council to assess the total cost of Project 806 to the developer and the new home owners of the Kennerick Addition. Name Address 1 / yyl L Q 2 3 145q'/z Lone, OA Roa~ 4 (45 5 IZV~ 7 0a k Rd 10 /yy L Dot f 11 Q 12 ay Z IA) 10/ 1:3 1Z Z 2 Z-:5 Page t of 2 Petition to Oppose Project 806 Kennerick Addition 16 F-3 10,')e 7t- r-Fl 18 19 1 y 3S Ate OlLL / 2i - 20 I N 3 S'" -d/,4,:, 21 50 7 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 /P I Page 2 of 2 1 FOR CITY USE ONLY Petition # Date Received _6 ~ 5_ -zvvl Presented to Council PETITION LOCATION/SUBDIVISION e, rnP f..c_a% C1f~_A or> I/We, the undersigned, owners of the real property adjacent to (2 c,~ c\ (Street) i or within C_4Lg Subdivision, hereby petition for: Street Improvements Sanitary Sewer Water Supply (Check requested items and please enclose sketch of Storm Sewer X requested improvements) Streetlights Other (Explain)\t~~,~~~-;,IG_ p(~Cy„10~~ I/We understand that this petition does not in itself re est the installation of these improvements, but rather, request the preparation of a feasibility report in which the estimated costs of these improvements will be tabulated. I/We understand that upon receipt of this petition and the preparation of the requested feasibility report, a public hearing will be held at which time we may voice our support or opposition based on the costs as prepared in said feasibility report. Signature of Land Owner Address of Property 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Its#1feasres.fm Petition for an Alternative Feasibility Study Drainage and Storm Sewer Improvement for the Kennerick Addition. The alternative drainage system would require the Kennerick Addition representatives to locate and excavate a holding pond within the development away from the existing Wetland. The holding pond would have to be sized based on the anticipated run off from the newly created hard surface areas, the property itself, and the flooding characteristics of the area based on 5-, 10-, 25-, and 50-year flood events. Description of the Alternative Drainage Area The drainage area would be constructed and located within the boundaries of the Kennerick Addition, away from the existing wetland. The City of Eagan, the surrounding property owners and the representatives of the Kennerick Addition would decide the exact location. The newly constructed drainage area would be sized to accommodate the runoff from the hardsurface areas within the Kennerick Addition, the property itself, and the flooding characteristics of the area based on 5-, 10-, 25-, and 50-year flood events. The hard surface areas would be equipped with storm water gutters, catch basins and properly sized pipe to direct the runoff into the newly created drainage area. The representatives of the Kennerick Addition would be required to grade the existing topography as such to accommodate and direct the run-off either into the storm water gutter system or the drainage area itself. The land to construct the drainage area would not be less than .50 acres or % half acre. The newly created drainage area, if constructed properly, would cancel the need to construct a lateral storm sewer extension or storm sewer outlet into Pond HP-11 near Skyline road. It would also cancel the need for Project 806. 131 Benefits of the Alternative Storm Sewer Drainage Area The newly created drainage area would cancel the need to construct a lateral storm sewer extension or storm sewer outlet into Pond HP-11 near Skyline Road and the need for Project 806. ✓ It would save the property owners of the assessed area and the taxpayers of Eagan approximately $248,000 dollars. If interest at 7% for 10 years was included, the cost savings would be $487.854 dollars. ✓ The threat of flooding the low area of Zehnder Acres would be greatly diminished or non- existent. ✓ The wetland area would be preserved at its present state and unharmed by the newly created Kennerick Addition. ✓ The ecology. topography, existing habitat, and natural beauty of the wetland area would be unadulterated ✓ The Kennerick Addition would have unanimous support by the surrounding landowners due to the fact that the wetland area would be left untarnished and unaffected. thus enabling the developer to move forward. ✓ The addition of a new drainage area would create less of an environmental impact due to the lower density of housing and the creation of a new ponding area for additional habitat. ✓ There would be no need for the city to obtain easements from existing property owners to construct the outlet pipe to HP-11, thus saving the City of Eagan the additional cost of the obtaining easements and the city staff time and expense from negotiating the cost of the easements. ✓ The construction of a new drainage area within the Kennerick Addition would raise the value of the homes built around the newly created ponding area and add to the appeal, splendor and brilliancy of the area. ✓ Property and habitat would not be damaged due to the fact that there would be no need to bring in large equipment to dig up the existing land and lay new pipe across many landowner's property. ✓ Many trees would be spared if the.alternative proposal is passed. ✓ There would be no assessments levied on the neighboring property oNvners of the Kennerick Addition. List of Affected Property Owners Peter L Gordon, Aloysius Mayers, Frances Wood, Robert N. Erlandson, Paulette L. Bosela, Michael Lahti, Joel B. Greer, Rosemary Wood, James E. Osland, Donald Palmateer, Vincent Kennedy, Jeffrey T. Zottneck, Gail E. McMahon, Bruce Konold, Lynn A. Field, Keith C. Anderson, Anne M. Maag, Michael Mitchell, Gerald L. Braun, Dale M. Naatjes, William M. Overn, Robert L. Reynolds Sr., Christopher R. Marshall, Micheal L. Lang, Mark J. Ogorman, Mitsuko M. Lutz Cost Agreement for Alternative Study The Petitioners direct the City of Eagan to conduct the study and pay all costs associated with the study. 133 By signing this petition, I hereby agree with the contents. I direct the City of Eagan to conduct the study of the alternative drainage area and for the City of Eagan to pay all costs associated with the study. Name Address L/ Ire--V 2 j q6 5 L g-m t optK 3 G~, l ~O ~c3yE O.f ~D 4 7 S 9 f~ o y, 'e (al k /~Cl , '7I'I7~1/~ lye s a-a- 1 4 SCI 'j a Lam nay, 9 10 12 13 14 9, (ZIP ear - 15 16 let b I 17 Page 4 of 5 i 19 20 7M 21 (~~i rr!-G k~ ya 7 L~ ?-,c- a,-L e~ 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -)g 30 31 32 33 34 Page 5 of 5 /3 1 APR 2 S 2001 Mitsuko Lutz 1459'/2 Lone Oak Road Eagan, MN 55121 Mayor Pat Awada 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 April 24, 2001 Mayor Awada, I will be unable to attend the public hearing on May 1, 2001, but I want my concerns regarding Project 806 to be acknowledged by you, the City Council Members and the Citizens of Eagan. I strongly oppose Project 806 or any other project that would impose on the existing wetland area, the habitat and the Zehnder acre neighborhood. The proposed project could have an alarming environmental impact on the current wildlife, ecosystem, and the pond's natural ability to hold water. The project could also put the 6 residents, whose homes abut the pond, at risk of flooding, if Project 806 is approved by the City Council. A separate drainage pond should be built within the Kennerick Addition, away from the wetland area. The drainage pond should be sized accordingly to fulfill the drainage needs of the Kennerick Addition and allowances should be made for unexpected snowfall or rainfall run-off. Best regards, Mitsuko Lutz ~3h Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 F. LOT 3, BLOCK 1, UNISYS PARK ADDITION (NORTHWEST AIRLINESI EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the Public Hearing and continue indefinitely the vacation of public drainage and utility easements within Unisys Park Addition and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On March 27, 2001, City staff received a petition from Bill Breyfogle, of Northwest Airlines, requesting the vacation of existing drainage and utility easements on Lot 3, Block 1 Unisys Park Addition, west of Pilot Knob Road and north of Yankee Doodle Road in north-central Eagan. • On April 3, the City Council received the petition for these vacations, and set a public hearing for May 1 to consider vacating said drainage and utility easements. • The easements were originally dedicated to the City as part of the Unisys Park Addition to accommodate public water main and sanitary sewer pipes within the development. The purpose of the request is to allow the expansion of the existing Northwest Airlines office building. The existing water main and sanitary sewer lines will be relocated and modified with new easements provided by the property owner via separate document as part of the building permit process. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected private utility owners informing them of this public hearing. No objections have been received to date. • This vacation request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action once the utilities have been relocated and new easement documents filed with the City. ISSUES : • To date, City staff has not received the new replacement easements nor have the utilities been relocated. The applicant has not yet applied for the related building permit, either. Therefore, it may be premature to proceed with the vacation at this time. ATTACHMENTS: • Location map, page -I-. os • Legal Descriptions/Graphics, page and. 13~ Q r\fl LKI X =V SKYLINE D R.:4 SKYLINE RD~>C_F~ i A~ ~GpNOa-E EPFIAN -5 m RD ~ RUSTI I PJF' HI LS DR. Q o R~AI A. P ~ J LONE OAK ROAD 3 ( CO. RD. 26 ) U 67 w Y PILOT I~ 9 KNOB oo I4 z a 1 PARKo w aJ l / o s~ z n v=i U 3 ~ a U U a 2 6 AEADOW VI U RED CEDAR RD. ( OWERVI RD. v TOWERVIEW RD. S UARRY FOUR J IF 'r0 ,o OAKS RD. I U / t o LOCATION o i Z y { o ! c LU 9MOON~NE o O0 I o DY PARK y<< o'° DR. ! W 9 c~ ono ~i US ~ W ' Qi; v I~ III lu J ° SNO LA l DRIVE ZETENDRE ST. m DR. i Q J' ° o w S m I RICE O~ 40 x o I a = ~I I Q' I I IVER BLUFF Q I QUARRY o = 9 pl ONJLp o PARK E LL NORWE~ST w f I I _ `~v W Cj CENTURY ~'i' PT• YANKEE DOODLE ROAD ( CO. RD. 28 ) I 81st WATER 97 I I_ DIER ST. DR. TREATMENT W Goo / FACI LITY z 0° CITY g 6 00 HE1GH~ DR. a INT FA CI ITY o a coACH'~N►`~ ° U OS~~ V) 53 EASEMENT VACATION LOT 3, BLOCK 1 - UNISYS PARK ADDITION City of Eagan NO ST AIRLINES PROPOSED EASEMENT VACATION DESCRIPTION LOT 3, BLOCK 1, UNISYS PARK ADDN That par of a 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for public utility purposes as described in Document No. 591662 are to be vacated. The centerline of said easement vacation is described as follows: Beginning at a point on the south line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 9, Township 27, Range 23, Dakota County, :Minnesota, distant 1860.57 feet westerly from the Southeast Corner of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 22 degrees 35 minutes 13 seconds East, assuming the south line of said Northeast Quarter bears North 88 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 67.19 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline of said easement to be vacated; thence continue North 89 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds West a distance of 119.55 feet; thence North 68 degrees 29 minutes 47 seconds East 330.14 feet; thence North 21 degrees 43 minutes 14 seconds West 20.77 feet and said centerline there terminating. And That part of a 20.00 foot wide perpetual easement for public utility purposes as described in Document No. 591662 is to be vacated. The centerline of said easement vacation is described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Northeast Quarter of Section 9, distant 1692.51 feet westerly of the Southeast comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 21 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds West, assuming the South line of said Northeast Quarter bears ?Forth 89 degrees 08 minutes 07 seconds West, 237.75 feet to the actual point of beginning of the centerline to be described; thence South 21 degrees 30 minutes 13 seconds East 95.25 feet and said centerline there terminating. I~1 t Q a 4-S-01 Exist. utility easement V\ Northwest Airlines Inc. \ \ Building J / Proposed \ Easement Unisys park \ \ Vacation \ / / Block Lot 3, \ / Exist. utility easement \ \ Proposed / Easement / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i/ i/ Q Unisys Park, Lot 3, Blk 1 ( Northwest Airlines Inc.) 4-5-01 City of Eagan Utility Easement Vacation I yo Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council G. VARIANCE - DUKE-WEEKS (LOTS 2,3 AND 4, EAGAN POINTE) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Variance to the minimum five-foot side yard pavement setback to allow a shared driveway for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Eagan Pointe. To approve a Variance to the minimum 25% green space on Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Eagan Pointe. FACTS: • The City Code requires a minimum side yard pavement and parking setback of five feet in the I-1 zoning district. In November 2000, the City Council approved the ordinance establishing a minimum green space standard in the I-1 zoning district of 25%. • Duke-Weeks is requesting a Variance to the minimum five-foot side yard pavement setback to allow a shared driveway between Lots 3 and 4, and a Variance to the minimum 25% green space on Lots 3 and 4. • The proposed development plans are consistent with those submitted with the subdivision application in 1999. • The proposed shared driveway allows consolidated access to Hwy. 149 and improved internal circulation within the development. • While the green space standard is not satisfied individually on Lots 3 and 4, in conjunction with Lot 2, all three lots exceed the standard, providing 27% green space. ATTACHMENTS: Planning Report, pages L4Q through/ X41 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 26, 2001 CASE: 12-VA-06-04-01 12-VA-07-04-01 APPLICANT: Duke-Weeks HEARING DATE: May 1, 2001 PROPERTY OWNER: Duke-Weeks APPLICATION DATE April 10, 2001 REQUEST: Variance PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: West of Hwy. 149 between Rolling Hills Drive and Chapel Lane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: IND, Limited Industrial ZONING: I-1, Limited Industrial SUMMARY OF REQUEST Duke-Weeks is requesting a Variance to the minimum five-foot side yard pavement setback to allow a shared driveway, and a Variance to exceed the maximum 25% green space. The shared driveway is proposed between Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Eagan Pointe, and the green space variance affects Lots 2, 3, and 4, Block 1, Eagan Pointe. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 3C states that the Council may grant a variance and impose conditions and safeguards only if: 1. The Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. Planning Report - Duke-Weeks (Eagan Pointe) May 1, 2001 Page 2 CODE REQUIREMENTS The City Code requires a minimum side yard pavement and parking setback of five feet in the I-1 zoning district. The City Code also requires that a minimum 25% green space be maintained within the I-1 zoning district. BACKGROUND/HISTORY The Eagan Pointe subdivision was platted in September 1999. The subdivision consolidated several parcels and subdivided them into five lots. As part of the subdivision application, the developer submitted a site plan. The site plan showed large office/warehouse buildings on Lots 2 and 3, (128,000 and 57,600 square feet) and smaller "build to suit" buildings on Lots 4 and 5. The developer worked with the City on the development plans to limit direct access to Hwy. 149 as identified in the Access Management Plan for Hwy. 149 (adopted by the City Council in May 1999), and to provide internal circulation between the parcels within the development. EXISTING CONDITIONS Lots 1 and 5 of the Eagan Pointe subdivision have been developed (TIP truck storage and Midwest Tile). Lots 2, 3, and 4 were graded with the initial site development and are currently vacant. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing to build office/warehouse buildings on Lots 2 and 3. A user for development on Lot 4 has not been secured, but the development includes a shared access between Lots 3 and 4, necessitating a pavement setback Variance for those two lots. In November 2000, the City adopted an ordinance requiring that development in the 1-1 zoning district maintain a minimum of 25% green space. The site plan for development on Lot 3 and anticipated site plan for development on Lot 4 do not satisfy this green space standard (Lot 3 = 20% and Lot 4 = 24%). At 31 the proposed development on Lot 2 exceeds the minimum green space standard. However, when all three lots are considered together, the amount of green space provided is 27%. The developer is requesting a Variance to allow less than the required 25% minimum green space on Lots 3 and 4, and to apply the green space standard to Lots 2, 3, and 4 combined, rather than each lot individually. Considering the three lots together results in green space of 27%. APPLICANT'S ESTIMATE OF HARDSHIP The proposed pavement setback Variance would allow for consolidated access to Hwy. 149, improved circulation within the development, and more efficient use of the land. /~3 Planning Report - Duke-Weeks (Eagan Pointe) May 1, 2001 Page 3 The green space ordinance is a new ordinance that did not exist at the time the Eagan Pointe subdivision was approved in 1999. The development as proposed is consistent with the plans presented at the time of subdivision application and while the green space standard may not be satisfied on each lot individually, the three lots together provide the minimum 25% green space. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Duke-Weeks is requesting a Variance to the minimum five-foot side yard pavement setback to allow a shared driveway, and a Variance to the minimum 25% green space on two lots. The proposed shared driveway allows for a single access between Lots 3 and 4. The green space ordinance has been adopted since this subdivision was approved in 1999. As proposed, the green space is not satisfied individually on Lots 3 and 4, but when considered in conjunction with Lot 2, together all three lots provide 27% green space. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Variance to the minimum five-foot side yard pavement setback to allow a shared driveway between Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Eagan Pointe. 1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it shall become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the council. Such extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance. 2. A cross easement for ingress and egress shall be provided for the shared driveway. The easement documents shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval prior to building permit issuance. To recommend approval of a Variance to the minimum 25% green space for Lots 3 and 4, Block 1, Eagan Pointe. 1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it shall become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the council. Such extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance. l~ Eagan Boundary Location Street Centerline Map Parcel Area Building Footprint C~ J1 7 Y4 2 ~ S Ye YC+ 00 1 ♦4 ~L \ +qc j 4 ~ \ 104.4 way y °t 3 Subject Site 4~'a Fr4f x s o + 5 A 9 ,t f~MNEEO000tlitD.'t---- Y OOODLlrtC 3 ® El i a C q, to r9 e 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Duke-Weeks Realty Corp. Application: Variance Case No.: 12-VA-07-04.01 Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Parcel base map data provided by Dakota County Land Survey Department and is current as of November 2000. City of Eagan THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY 0,fq~igan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are s Community Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. C 101 NV Id :911S am 0= rue 7t#Itfd tlaiNM 31M0r MV011f ' d r t Jill" lpo~ , Ot ~ Z ~ r1r a .L -r-- - J -r-------------~ : r - i ` ci t E~ . > ~ 1SE 7 - *4d4 r ►ii tzE - \ t~! tit ~ tE IFS I v , i-- 1 - ; i 1 I Z 10-1 NV -Id 311S W awrJ°633MOwamo aVAG te iyl } =Vd good rw: 1 : 1 - , 4® - ----41 Q :1 1 ~r tlst/ 9g E , ~ ~ { - ~V tg - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ul R y iti? 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - r4y►l1p! ' r til y I y _ - - - - - - - - 1 4 - 52 ? - ~ e ---------~Pgttl Y, ' q- T I4-4 • a~ I - - - - - - - - 3 X15 x_1.:7 1 • .j - - - - - - - - - ~IfF• I II ' !t ¢€t F `i ''Ilk !SX443 tp EpSSi z ----t-------r--------- } 1 7:' _ r~•wa~ ' - c _ 1 F,v`-,JDukeweeks CONSTRUCTION Application For Variance For Eagan Pointe Project title: Eagan Pointe Project location: The project site is located on south west side of Highway 149, a few hundred feet North of Yankee Doodle Road. Legal description: Lot 2, Lot 3, and lot 4 Block 1, Eagan Pointe. Background Information: The 5 lot plat and master site plan of Eagan Pointe, was approved by the City of Eagan and the plat filed with Dakota County in Late 1999. Lots 2-5 were graded, and utilities installed in 2000. Lot 1, was retained by Dart Transfer, Lot 5 was sold to Midwest Tile for their facility. Until now Lots 2, 3, & 4 have remained vacant land in fee ownership of Duke- Weeks Realty Corporation. Project description: This proposal for lots 2 and 3 consist of the proposed building on lot 2, of 128,000 square foot building for Eagle Global Logistics, and on lot 3 building a 57,732 square foot building for AIT Worldwide Logistics. Lot 4 will remain vacant standing ready for a future building. Ordinance Requirement: Section 11.20 Subd. 15 (A) of the city code requires a minimum side yard setback of 5' for parking and driveways. Section 11.20 Subd. 15 (A) of the city code as amended October 2000, requires a 25% green space. Situation Requiring Variance: Two variances are required in association with the approved plat and recent changes in zoning ordinance. The ordinance does not give provisions for a shared driveway installed on a common property line. Such driveway or parking area requires a 5 foot side yard setback as proposed between lot 3 and lot 4. The plan as previously approved and platted met green space requirements at the time of platting. Since then the ordinance has changed in October 2000 to reflect a higher green space requirement of 25%. Resulting in lots 3 and 4 as non-conforming lots. Variance Circumstances: Driveway: The driveway as approved on the master site plan and now application for building permit identifies a shared driveway on the common side lot line of lots 3 and 4. The City code does not provide for driveways in this shared configuration without a 5 foot setback 1600 Utica Avenue South Suite 250 Minneapolis. MN 55416 `qe Phone 952.543.2900 to side yards. This driveway aligns with the approved access opening on to Highway 149 and directs traffic to the rear of the site between the proposed buildings. In this circumstance the shared driveway best serves the entire plat. The driveway will also have an easement for access purposes. Green space: The proposed plans as submitted for building permit reflects the same building size and green space as approved on the original master plan in 1999. As a result of code amendment in October 2000 the individual lot 3 and lot 4 do not meet the new 25% green space requirement. This variance request proposes a blend of green space across lots 2, 3, and 4 to meet the new requirement. The blended areas results in an overall 27% green space. Eagan Pointe Project No. 99-047 4/10/01 Tim McNaboe -Engineer HTPO Eagan Pointe Green Space Calculations Lo~~ Total Acreage = 8.5 acres Green Space = 2.6 acres Green Space % = 31 % Loo"'3 Total Acreage = 4.1 acres Green Space = 0.8 acres Green Space % = 2017c Lop?~4 Total Acreage = 1.7 acres Green Space = 0.4 acres Green Space % = 24% ~3 4 Blend of Lots Y, x, and Total Acreage = 14.3 acres Green Space = 3.8 acres Green Space % = 27%r 'Calculations are based on plans dated 3-15-01 and then adjusted to account for code amendment to larger parking stall dimensions of 10 ft x 19 ft. ly9 f J . v 4 -~--i---Y--•-- ys v ---i-- ' i l rn i' ~ } I SJT~ AL ~I s Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting A. APPOINTMENT TO WASTE REDUCTION COMMISSION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To appoint a waste hauler representative to fulfill the remainder of a three-year Waste Reduction Commission term ending January 2002. FACTS: • A position vacancy exists on the Waste Reduction Commission following the resignation of one of two waste hauler representatives. • The position term expires in January 2002. • Applications were sought and Ron Moening of Waste ManaGement, Inc. has submitted application to fill this position. ATTACHMENTS: • A copy of the commission application for Mr. Moening is included without page number. f Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - KATHLEEN COOLEY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Conditional Use Permit to allow a total of 1,624 square feet of accessory storage space on property located at 4395 Diffley Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 25, subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. FACTS: • The applicant is proposing to construct a 1,096 square foot (26' x 42') detached accessory building on the subject site. In conjunction with an existing 528 square foot attached garage, a total of 1,624 square feet of accessory storage space would exist on the property. • The site is 2.9 acres in size and open with scattered trees. No trees are proposed to be removed as a result of the construction. • The proposed accessory building is located to the side and rear of the existing residence. The building is to be accessed on the south, three overhead doors face south yard, and the building is proposed to have windows on the other three sides. • The proposed accessory building will have vinyl siding and asphalt shingles in colors to match the existing residence. • On-site landscape screening along the north side of the building should be provided and is a condition of permit approval. • At their regular meeting on April 24, 2001, the Advisory Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Conditional Use Permit and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the APC meeting minutes. ATTACHMENTS: April 24, 2001 APC Minutes, pages JW through 8 Staff report, pages J_q through Is a Cite of Eagan Planning Commission Meeting April 24, 2001 Page 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - KATHLEEN COLLEY Chair Heyl opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow an accessory structure that would result in total accessory structure area on the site in excess of 1100 square feet, on property located at 4395 Dodd Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 25. Planner Dudziak introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City staff's planning report dated April 19, 2001. She noted the background, history and the existing conditions. Applicant Kathleen Cooley stated opposition to the condition that states there shall be no passenger vehicles stored outside of the structure. There being no public comment, Chair Hey] closed the public hearing and turned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Steininger questioned the number of passenger vehicles that will be allowed outside of the structure. Planner Dudziak stated that the applicant is requesting that the passenger vehicle restriction be taken out of the conditions of approval. Member Nosbush asked about the size of the present structure that will be demolished. Mrs. Cooley stated that the present accessory structure is 10 x 16. Chair Heyl opined that condition number 6 is important and the screening is necessary, but wondered if the setback should be further than 5 feet. She stated that the Conditional Use Permit would help to clean up the property. Member Segal stated that, if approved, the accessory structure square footage will exceed the size of the principal structure. Mr. Cooley stated that the house is 26 x 46 and the proposed structure will be 26 x 42. Member Huusko moved, Member Hunter seconded a motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit to allow an accessory structure that would result in total accessory structure area on the site in excess of 1100 square feet, on property located at 4395 Dodd Road in the NW 1/4 of Section 25 subject to the following conditions: i City of Eagan Planning Comnussion Meeting April 24, 2001 Page 4 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of its approval by the City Council. 2. The accessory building shall match the principal building in color. 3. The existing shed shall be removed from the property. 4. No commercial or home occupation activities shall take place within the accessory building. 5. There shall be no outside storage of recreational vehicles, yard or recreational equipment and other such items on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan for screening along the north side of the building. The landscape plan will be subject to City staff review and approval, and must be completed prior to release of the Conditional Use Permit for recording. The proposed five-foot side yard setback may need to be increased to provide sufficient space for effective landscape screening. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: Steininger, Bendt, Huusko, Chair Heyl, Segal and Hunter. Nay: Nosbush. Motion carried. /s~. a PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: April 19, 2001 CASE: 25-CU-05-03-01 APPLICANT: Kathleen Cooley HEARING DATE: April 24, 2001 PROPERTY OWNER: Kathleen Cooley APPLICATION DATE: March 20, 2001 REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit PREPARED BY: Pamela Dudziak LOCATION: 4395 Dodd Road COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD, Low Density Residential ZONING: A, Agricultural SUMMARY OF REQUEST Kathleen Cooley has requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the total accessory storage space on property located at 4395 Dodd Road to exceed 1,100 square feet. Specifically, the applicant is proposing to construct a 1,092 square foot (42' x 26') detached accessory building on the subject site. In conjunction with an existing 528 square foot attached garage, a total of 1,624 square feet of accessory storage space would exist on the property. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivisions 4C and 4D provide the following. Subdivision 4C states that the Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it finds that such use at the proposed location: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the /53 Planning Report - Kathleen Cooley April 24, 2001 Page 2 essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Subdivision 4D, Conditions, states that in reviewing applications of conditional use permits, the Planning Commission and the Council may attach whatever reasonable conditions they deem necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with these uses, to protect the value of other property within the district, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In all cases in which conditional uses are granted, the Council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that the conditions stipulated in connection therewith are being and will be complied with. BACKGROUNDMISTORY The subject property is unplatted and consists of 2.9 acres (190' wide by 670' deep). The site contains an existing single-family home that was constructed in 1968, and is setback about 200 feet from the front property line. Access to the property is provided from Dodd Road. EXISTING CONDITIONS The existing single-family home includes an attached garage on the north side of the building. The driveway is unpaved. The property also contains a shed, which is proposed to be removed with the construction of the new accessory building. The topography of the site is largely flat, with scattered trees. There are no wetlands on the property. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: Planning Report - Kathleen Cooley April 24, 2001 Page 3 North - Single family homes; zoned PD (Planned Development); guided LD (Low Density Residential) South - Highline Trail and Exel Energy Easement; zoned P (Park); guided P (Park) East - Single family homes; zoned R-1 (Single-Family Residential); guided LD West - Single family residential; zoned R-1; guided LD EVALUATION OF REQUEST Site Plan - According to the submitted Site Plan, the proposed accessory building is to be located to the north and west of the existing garage (within the side and rear yards). The existing shed located next to the attached garage will be removed. The proposed detached accessory building is 1,092 square feet in area. The total building coverage area (existing house, attached garage, and proposed detached garage) would be 2,816 square feet, or 2.2% of this 2.9-acre site. Setbacks - According to the City Code, an accessory building may not be closer than five feet from a side or rear lot line. The proposed accessory building will be set back five feet from the side lot line and almost 400 feet from the rear lot line and complies with applicable setback requirements. Building Height and Materials - According to the City Code, an accessory building may not exceed 16 feet in height. The proposed accessory building measures 12.75 feet in height and satisfies the code requirement. The proposed accessory building has three overhead doors on the south side of the building (facing into the yard), three windows on the north side (facing adjacent property), two windows on the west (rear) end of the building, and a service door and one window on the east (front) end of the building. The applicant has also indicated that skylights may be installed. Vinyl siding and asphalt shingles are proposed. The color of the siding and the shingles should match those of the principal structure. Use of Structure - According to the applicant, the accessory building will be used to store vehicles, trailers, boat, snowmobiles, lawn maintenance equipment and other items that are currently stored outside on the property. As a condition of CUP approval, no commercial or home occupation activities may take place within the accessory building. Outside Storage - One reason a Conditional Use Permit for accessory storage space in excess of 1,100 square feet may be granted is to provide storage area inside a building for passenger vehicles, recreational vehicles, yard and recreational equipment and other such items. Therefore, there should be no outside storage of such items on the property if the Conditional Use Permit is approved. Planning Report - Kathleen Cooley April 24, 2001 Page 4 Landscaping and Screening - There is a row of mature evergreen trees on adjacent property to the north that may serve to screen the building from adjoining property. However, rather than relying on off-site plantings, on-site screening should be provided. The applicant should submit a landscape plan for screening along the north side of the building. The proposed five-foot side yard setback may need to be increased to provide sufficient space for effective landscape screening. The landscape plan will be subject to City staff review and approval and must be completed prior to release of the Conditional Use Permit for recording. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION Kathleen Cooley is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the total accessory storage space on property located at 4395 Dodd Road to exceed 1,100 square feet. The applicant is proposing to construct a 1,092 square foot (42' x 26') detached accessory building, which, in conjunction with an existing 528 square foot attached garage, would result in a total of 1,624 square feet of accessory storage space on the property. On-site landscape screening along the north side of the building should be required. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the total accessory storage space on property located at 4395 Dodd Road to exceed 1,100 square feet. If approved, the following conditions should apply: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded at Dakota County within 60 days of its approval by the City Council. 2. The accessory building shall match the principal building in color. 3. The existing shed shall be removed from the property. 4. No commercial or home occupation activities shall take place within the accessory building. 5. There shall be no outside storage of passenger vehicles, recreational vehicles, yard or recreational equipment and other such items on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit a landscape plan for screening along the north side of the building. The landscape plan will be subject to City staff review and approval, and must be completed prior to release of the Conditional Use Permit for recording. The proposed five-foot side yard setback may need to be increased to provide sufficient space for effective landscape screening. FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 25-CU-05-03-01 10-02500-060-29 There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling S-O- on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The approval of the conditional use permit is not contingent upon the payment of these Connection/Availability Charges. The charges become due and payable with connection to the City's Utilities. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Storm Sewer Trunk SF .088/Sq Ft 77,260 Sq Ft $6,799 TOTAL $6,799 /,57 Eagan Boundary reter,ine E-7 Street Arq j Location Map Pared E-7 Building Footprint i ffi . v \JJ W~ wit i .v- A ` l C1 d ® g a„ d ~O e d g red 4 p 3 M r ~ ~ m C 9 9 a ~ e f F ■p d a4 0 t ■ b t • t v ~ • I 8 ~ T "tea 9 ® v ■ ■ v . a a a e a a e o g 3 o e a aaa , a a e ® ~ • 6®~ ■ ar s► ® - e o es ® e m 8 ® v ♦ ° v ® • a to 9 Q it .0 Q ~ C to C ~ f rs v r® rs y e a ~ I Sub'ect Site 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ doa~" t c? D r o 0 3 P d ..e.u... IF ® ® 9 ~9PAP ® ca t ,Cu © a d ma►a p" v a ti~BO it _B ~ a amy ® ® • ° 4 a , ' * O sa fr B d' ~s 8 d ® a 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer. Kathleen Cooley Application: Conditional Use Permit Case No.: 25-CU-05-03-01 Map pnpand usrq carEASI ve eVNw ent Parts base map date provided N by Dakob County Land Svrv■Y Deportment ■nd is current ■s of November 1000. *City of Eagan THIS MAP 13 INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY w E All N N E S C T a The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are Community Dwelopmem Department not responsible for errors or omissions. 5 Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan City of Eagan Land Use Map Case No. 25-CU-05-03-01 Liu. i-f-I Zoning Map A I I I 1 1 A •1 + PF Current Zoning: A 1 A Agriculture A 111111111H P P A P R- R P aoo 0 am 1200 F... Comprehensive Guide Plan/ Land Use Map LD op a LD LD /I Current Land Use Designation: ` LD LD Low Density Residential P P LD L aeo 0 No 1200 F.N pareal base /nap bforrnatloo pFovkNby Dakota County Land Survey Doparhnort 0401/01. N tonbN b&nnatba mainlabnA by City St". *City of Eagan 71 THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the acclaacy of this Information. S 1 190 39 LJ E- zb' a v r ow" KI a C-p R r (1 Sr VJ e.w. uv~ A,a, r V' a k yt W A Y .?vy' a3o' } 3 3 i ~ 4 p Vold IR 8. SITE PLAN / GD LLI 1(U DWI v c d C'6 40 Q h O - R O N ~ ~ v o oC C Q 1j~r-`. ^~r r-z, r- p OC X ~ ~ ~ C6 Q u'~ ap 01, ~x ~d V~ 3.7 OF- O 1 tn-i ~ C Q • N 0 CZi ~ ~c - 4 b V O 3 3 .mac _ J l / iQ Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting C. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to designate an area in SE Eagan as Special Area, subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. FACTS: ➢ At their regular meeting of April 3, 2001, the City Council directed staff to bring a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to the Advisory Planning Commission for a Public Hearing on April 24, 2001 for the purpose of creating a Land Use designation of "Special Area" on sixteen parcels of land located in the south half of Section 36. ➢ As part of the motion on the Special Area, the City Council also directed staff to prepare an Interim Use Ordinance for the purpose of protecting the planning process associated with the study area in Section 36. At their regular meeting of April 17, 2001, the City Council adopted the Interim Ordinance establishing a moratorium on development for the properties designated for further study. The Interim Use Ordinance calls for an ending date of December 31, 2001, or such sooner time as the City Council may determine. ➢ At their regular meeting of April 24, 2001, the Advisory Planning Commission held the Public Hearing and, on a 4-3 vote, recommended approval of the Amendment only for the properties without frontage on Biscayne Avenue. The three nay voters did not think any Special Area designation was appropriate for SE Eagan. ISSUES: ➢ Several area property owners spoke at the hearing and shared their concerns regarding the City's interference in their small business operations, investments they've made for street, utility, and property improvements as suggested by the Eagan City Council in 1995, and the lack of fairness in subjecting the Biscayne area to another study. ➢ Several Planning Commissioners voiced their opinion that the existing Land Use Plan designations were appropriate and that any special study for the area should have been identified as part of the' work that was done to update the Comprehensive Plan. ATTACHMENTS: (2) April 24, 2001 APC Minutes, page April 18, 2001 Staff Report, page 0%5 through&. /~3 City of Eagan Planning Commission Meeting April 24, 2001 Page 6 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT - CITY OF EAGAN Chair Hey] opened the final public hearing of the evening regarding a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment to consider a Special Area designation in southeast Eagan located south of Red Pine Lane on either side of Trunk Hwy 3. Senior Planner Mike Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the background, history and the surrounding use of the property. Five residents/business owners stated the following concerns: • Out-of-pocket money spent for street, curb and utilities. • Re-visitation of issue from 6 years ago. • Creation of hardships on small business owners. Chair Heyl stated that the area has acquired more residential development since the previous visitation of this issue. There being no further public comment, Chair Heyl closed the public hearing. Chair Heyl asked Senior Planner Ridley if the moratorium was in place, irrespective of the Council's determination on the Special Area designation. Senior Planner Ridley stated that that was correct. Member Hunter stated the study should have a focus point of the west side of Hwy 3. He recommended the removal of the area in which the industrial businesses are located. Member Steininger stated opposition to the re-visitation of the issue. He stated the time is inappropriate. Chair Heyl stated she agreed with Member Hunter on the focus of the west side of Hwy 3. She further discussed that there was a new Mayor and Council and that they see the need to revisit an expanded study area in southeast Eagan from that studied 6 years ago. Member Segal stated that the Comprehensive Guide Plan established Special Areas, excluding this area. Senior Planner Ridley discussed the request to amend the Comprehensive Guide Plan. Member Hunter moved, Member Bendt seconded a motion to remove the properties that border Biscayne Avenue from the Special Area study. A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: Bendt, Huusko, Chair Heyl and Hunter. Nay: Steininger, Segal and Nosbush. Motion carried. city of eagan MEMO TO: Chair Heyl and Planning Commission Members FROM: Mike Ridley, Senior Planner WOO- DATE: April 18, 2001 SUBJECT: SE Eagan Special Area On February 20, 2001, the City Council adopted the Eagan 2000 Comprehensive Guide Plan. At that time, discussion occurred regarding the establishment of a Special Area for SE Eagan. Staff discussed the process necessary to create this study area with the City Attorney and because it will be considered an amendment to the Comp Plan, it will be necessary for the Council to direct this item to the APC for a Public Hearing and then Council action will be subject to review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. As you may recall, the Draft Comp Plan created seven Special Areas that were labeled as such because they were/are areas where, due to differing land uses, the City determined that these were areas of transition that required specific planning studies to ensure an orderly change to ultimate development. Therefore, on April 3, 2001, in addition to directing the item to the April APC, the City Council had more discussion to assist in narrowing the physical focus of the area that will be subject to the study and the emphasis of the subsequent Special Area study. The area to be considered for Special Area designation is included on the attached map. The Council directed that the emphasis of the study be on the long-term suitability and viability of the existing industrial land uses and the potential for neighborhood convenience retail to serve southeast Eagan. In official action taken at their regular meeting of April 17, 2001, the City Council adopted an Interim Ordinance that establishes a moratorium on development until December 31, 2001 for the area depicted on the attached map. Please call me at 651-681-4689 if you have any questions. /~5 i Eagan Boundary Location Map Street Area Psa^eN Ana " Building Footprint 9 8 ~ ~ ~ f~ A ~ b •vr~ w~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 'a .s1 t'1 Q e ~ Ps ~ a0 ®e ^J ~ + aw.un~ 0. a ' ~ ~ a® e P- -4 e• 'r llaa kf 'Q f . c ' g p : s a _ ° to a a r ~a a ~ v a v P o Eo A ° 9 0 ~ ~ A ~J a d ♦ .s~ 4 ~ o a ® o C3 t 6 5.~*=, ~8' g flW® ~ ti © All ° ate 9 d a3 9 E 16 6 ® ® t p % - Subject Site % a 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer. City of Eagan Application: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Case No.: 36-CG-03-0401 Map Prepared using ERSI ArcView 3.1. Panel bona map data provided N by Dakota County Land Survey Department and Is current as of November 200. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY 16 w E City of Eagan M. I N N E S O 7 A The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and an 5 Ceminwity Development Department not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan City of Eagan Land Use Map Case No. 36-CG-03-04-01 Zoning Map A R- e r : A A Current Zoning: Mixed ce PF Lill_ 8 R-1 N GB A Location Q P A ON o wo 12" F«t Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map LD LD : LD D ~J 1" • Current Land Use Designation: D LD OP Mixed ~ LD IND ND LD Lp P Location LD P LD tin LD wo o wo 1300 F..t P-1 bw i-.P lnf m "o- F•e.a.sy D.kot. Q. ty L.M aw.y s."" -.n "01/01. N z.-r~a tie--.ne- -~r-e.rw by cur sta. *City of Eagan 146P W E THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY Community Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantaa the accuracy of this Information7 . S Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2000 Eagan City Council Meeting D. REQUEST FOR CODE AMENDMENT - ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To direct staff to prepare an amendment to Table A of the Sign Code to allow the erection of a 672 square foot (each side) and 40 foot high billboard upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 and east of 35E in the northwest'/4 of Section 2. FACTS: ➢ Adams Outdoor Advertising wishes to relocate a 672 square foot (each sign face) and 40 foot high billboard presently located at 2857 Lexington Avenue to the property to a location approximate 2,100 feet to the north within Canadian Pacific Railway property. To accommodate such relocation, Table A of the Sign Code must be amended. ➢ In December of 1991, the City approved a conditional use permit to allow an advertising sign (billboard) greater than 250 square feet in area at 2867 Lexington Avenue. One of the conditions of approval was that such sign be removed within 60 days of the time the property is sold or developed. On April 3, 2001, the City Council approved a rezoning and Final Plat (Northern Power Products Addition) to allow the future construction of a 50,000 square foot office/warehouse upon such property. As a condition of Final Plat approval, it is stipulated that the billboard presently existing on the property must be removed. ISSUES: ➢ It is important to note that the eventual removal of the billboard has been understood by both the City and sign owner since its original erection and that the City is in no way obligated to allow its relocation. ➢ While the proposed billboard would meet the minimum 1,000 foot spacing requirement of the Sign Code (approximately 1,800 feet east of a Delite Outdoor Advertising sign), its erection would be contrary to an intent of the Sign Code of minimizing such sign type in the City. ATTACHMENTS (3) Existing Sign Location Map, page Adams Outdoor Advertising Correspondence, pages[ through 19-- Sign Code - Table A, page S I+o-07 07- ,J1 141-07 n t LJ ~ i ♦,9~r\ I ` X21-OI I Z+ Ct) I1I-07 ' I C) I E N G 201- ~QO I 10 KNOX LU` ABER i Z ~ E PGPN No ~ • ~ eI o P W kwviCE ROAD • I YI'HO t i r Q I ~ L r Q i rr vurru •v 0 I C-i L NE OAK RD f _ uo.r a. rw.or CS.- No :6 ~ 9 APR. -1" 01 IR1J II 05 P. 002 April 17, 2001 Mr. Bob Kirmis City Planner City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Dear Mr. Kirmis: As we discussed today, Adams Outdoor Advertising is the owner of the off- premises advertising sign at 2875 Lexington Avenue South, which is sign #10 in Table A of Eagan Sign Ordinance. Please accept this letter as our formal application to relocate this sign to another parcel as permitted under Section 4.20, Subdivision 4, of the sign ordinance. This relocation may require a new or amended conditional use permit. The new proposed sign location is approximately 2100 feet north of the existing location, on the Canadian Pacific Railway property. See attached sketch and letter of permission to apply for the permit. We will move the exact sign structure to the new location, so it will not change in appearance. Please contact me on the correct procedure the city will require for this sign relocation. Thank you for your time and help. Sincerely, John P. Bodger ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING 6700 11AKER ROAD. MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 95347 TCL. 952.936.9667 fAX- 932.936.0605 WWW.ADAMSOUTbOOR.COM /70 .APR. -1- 01 (TUD 11 05 P 005 =ELL~E ? April 13, 2001 RE: Permit Authorization Folder (CP 9) To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that Eller Media Company, having the exclusive rights to manage the signboard program for Canadian Pacific Railroad and their affiliate lines, grants permission to Robert A. Graiziger or anyone acting on behalf Adams Outdoor Advert "m to apply for governmental permits and approvals for the construction and operation of an advertising sign to be located on the CP Railroad property located East of Interstate 35, South of Highway 55, at or near Eagan, MN. A drawing of the approximate location of the proposed sign is attached. The sign company and its employees do not represent the railroad in any capacity and are neither the Railroads agent nor representative. The Sign Company will need to obtain final site approval from both the Railroad and Eller. If you have any questions regarding the above information, please contact me at (602) 957.8116. Sincerely, Mary r s Vice President - Land Lease Division Attachments This Authorization letter can be revoked and deemed null and void at Eller Media's discretion. This letter automatically expires one (1) year from date of issue. ELLER MEDIA COMPANY YC_: C:, 1171 -i-' 01 (TIEI 11 05 - ! ' - P. 004 of r a9~ \ p 02030 STATE 010-3 ` ~ J~8? (((f P T 0 f ~O / , s~ 010-31 ~~L\ kl~ r 9e / I I STAT ° \ \ } Pr Of PT CF I * 010-31 ~ 1 ~ h 3 'gyp O 529-34 F9h a~ - 730.75 7 1t r~ I ~Q s "A- g32 16 -7 V /I ar ~0 6.5 I ! ~o G i o n000o 01C I °0 1 5.00 c 70.00 70.001 70.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 70.00 0.0 70.00 7 00 70.00 75.00 NN. 1 ;4 M1$ c el c of e o c e e{ o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 .v o, o ;n 1155.0 .r . 1 r •.I 'j u~l' "J"I A m $ t v -113 12 11 10 9 a 7 6 5 I3 7P 1n / ice n 7 nn 1 n 7n rtol" N -Y n 7^ " 7R W1.1 nn 'r N 6eerfngs are referenced to the Dakota County coordinate system, E DAKOTA 200 0 zoo 400 Date of r FEET WIRI-O O O CO O CO O O- O O * O d ll') In In In lA 00 O In N w N M to 1n N r~ ti r` f` N t` f' r r _ LL O ~ N d N O O O 00 O 00 O O 00 O r-- 0 Lo U5 0 N cM M M M V M M O to CD (D N N 4) ~ (6 'D LL a to rn N N N N r- N N N N V N N 7 W LO M O p c _ 0 0 co co U rn o a c c a L Y Y m C4 0 m e I Lci C O O 0~ d L O (n R 06~ ce) o v 2 ca c Q) c cn M 2 > >.3UU=o= c 3~M 3 7- = c aci o (1) o J _ w 2 a) a) 42) c C: -C (u N v C = O L = CO L 3 .?,0 0 cc 0 c o rn o 0 m m cri C' C,5 r, r- r` c c c c LO r r P-- r LJ J 3 J 2 2 M 2 Z Z c U) c V) CU C O U et c Z o U U c y W O p~ Z N c L ~ c a=i~ >m m a) 0) CD CD > (D c C ai 0) ai g c` a ~ 2 a a co a n a~i 3~ x m Co M d 00 2 cn cn U 2 to F- t- w N ooonoooru-)r cno cn cn cn r` o o Ln d rl- 00 cn cn a I-- N 0) 00 r r'- M 00 CO r N r- N N N M'9T CO V' M N r r N d ~ ~ d O r N r N M,t M (O N 00 d r r r 17-3 AGENDA CITY OF EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAY 1, 2001 1. Call to order II. Approval of Minutes III. Appointment of Secretary / Assistant Executive Director IV. Approve Contract for Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) V. Approve Contract for Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Inspection Services VI. Adjournment Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting II. APPROVE MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution approving minutes of the April 17, 2001 EDA meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes are attached on pages tl~regl~ . • Resolution is attached on page t MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Eagan, Minnesota April 17, 2001 A meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority was held on Monday, March 6, 2000 at 6:40 p.m. at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were President Awada and Commissioners Bakken, Carlson, Fields and Tilley. Also present were Executive Director Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS Commissioner Bakken moved, Commissioner Tilley seconded a motion to change the annual meeting date of the Economic Development Authority to the third Tuesday in April. Commissioner Tilley moved. Commissioner Carlson seconded a motion to approve the minutes of the March 6, 2000 Economic Development Authority meeting. Aye: 4 Nay: 0 (Bakken abstained) Commissioner Tilley moved, Commissioner Bakken seconded a motion to approve the election of officers as follows: President: Awada Vice President: Carlson Treasurer: Tilley Secretarn and Assistant Treasurer: Cyndee Fields Ave: 5 Nav: 0 NEW BUSINESS RESOLUTION SUPPORTING MODIFICATIONS NORTHEAST EAGAN DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2, TAX INCREMENT FINANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 Executive Director Hedges discussed this item regarding modifications to the Tax Increment Finance Plan for NE Eagan Development District No. 2, TIF District No. 3. Commissioner Tilley moved. Commissioner Bakken seconded a motion to approve the resolution adopting modifications to the Tax Increment Finance Plan for NE Eagan Development District No. 1, TIF District No. 3. Ave: 5 Nay: 0 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. to the regular City Council meeting. Date Executive Director If you need these minutes in an alternative form such as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc, please contact the Cite of Ewan; 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, MN 55122, (612) 681-4600 (TDD phone: (612) 454-8535. a EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION APPROVING MINUTES OF APRIL 17, 2001 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve the minutes of the April 17, 2001 meeting of the Eagan Economic Development Authority. Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Tom Hedges, Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 17 rd day of April, 2001. Thomas L. Hedges, Executive Director 3 Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting III. APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY/ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution appointing Assistant City Administrator Jamie Verbrugge as the EDA Secretary/Assistant Executive Director. FACTS: • At the Eagan Economic Development Authority meeting on April 17, 2001, the EDA elected officers for 2001. As part of the action taken, Council Member Fields was included on the slate of candidates as Secretary. The position of Secretary/Assistant Executive Director was identified in the EDA April 17, 2001 Agenda Information Memo as an appointed position due to the administrative nature of the position. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution is attached on page. EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION APPOINTING A SECRETARY/ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to appoint Assistant City Administrator Jamie Verbrugge as the Secretary/Assistant Executive Director. Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Tom Hedges, Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this l" day of May, 2001. Thomas L. Hedges, Executive Director i Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting IV. APPROVE CONTRACT FOR CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution approving an contract with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. for an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. FACTS: • In preparing for the potential development of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, staff evaluated environmental reviews that might be required for parts or all of a redevelopment project. After reviewing the size, scope, and potential future land uses in the Area, staff believes that an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) will be necessary. • SRF Consulting Group is familiar with the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, having facilitated the Cedar Avenue and Highway 13 Redevelopment Study Task Force proceedings in 1999. SRF prepared the "Village Plaza" visioning document that was the basis for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area conceptual land use refinements adopted by the City Council in February 2001. • SRF Consulting Group has prepared an estimate of approximately 588,000 to conduct the environmental review. The AUAR is a lengthy process that will be conducted over the next ten to twelve months. As the City reviews redevelopment programs submitted recently for the Area, staff and consultants will estimate redevelopment build-out densities and traffic projections to meet the requirements of the AUAR. • As required by law, the attached resolution also states the EDA's intent to have the City be reimbursed for the cost of the study by Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues generated as a result of new development in the Area. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution is attached on page. • SRF proposal is attached on pages I throughcZ. tY EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH THE FIRM OF SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. FOR CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve a contract with SRF Consulting Group for the purpose of performing an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the EDA intends to reimburse this administrative expenditure with Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Jamie Verbrugge, Secretary/Assistant Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this I" day of May, 2001. James D. Verbrugge, Secretary t V~~rSi~- uaca~. C 0 N S U L T I N G GROUP, I NC. Tran<portation • Ci%,il • Structural • En~,ironmental • Planning • Traffic • Landscape Architecture • Parking March 20, 2001 1 1 -i Mr. Mike Ridley = - Senior Planner CITYOF EAGAN 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 SUBJECT: AUUAR FOR CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT (FORMERLI- KNOw\ As CED.ARVALF) Dear Mike: In response to your request, we have prepared this proposal to complete an Alternative Urban Areawvide Review (AUAR) Process for the Cedar Grove redevelopment area. The AUAR process will involve analysis and documentation of the impacts of one development scenario for the Cedar Grove area. It is our understanding that an RFP process is currently underway that will assist City staff in confirming or refining the most appropriate development scenario for this area. It is important that the development scenario be agreed upon early in the process to ensure efficient and expeditious analysis of impacts. The AUAR documentation will incorporate specific information provided by City staff on the planned development, as well as other developments in the area. City staff will also need to provide information on drainage 'runoff, infrastructure requirements and effects on City services as outlined in the attached work tasks. We will work closely with City staff to be sure that the AUAR document reflects accurate and up-to-date assumptions. The attached work tasks identify coordination meetings with City staff, resources agencies and the City Council. A traffic analysis is included as Task 3 of the Scope of Work. This analysis will expand on work recently completed for Cedarvale area. Additional traffic counts will be completed to augment the data previously collected to address issues outside the immediate development. The traffic analysis will include one development scenario for two time periods: 2005 (initial phase) and 2015 (build out). Before proceeding with this analysis, we will confirm that these are the most appropriate time periods for analysis. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (Air Quality staff) may have concerns about the phasing and require analysis of additional time periods. They may also have concerns about additional intersections along TH 13. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150, Minneapolis, hlti 55147-4443 Telephone (763) 475-0010 ■ Fax (763) 475-2429 ■ http:wv,, •.srfconsuItinL;.com An Mr. Mike Ridley - 2 - March 20, 2001 A feasibility study was completed by SRF in December 2000 for intersection modifications in the Cedarvale area. If an additional feasibility study will be required to address public improvements within the AUAR redevelopment area, then the Scope of Work and budget ~N ill need to be adjusted. As requested, we included a task to review MVTA's transit needs in the Cedar Grove area and identify suitable locations within the development area for park-and-ride or bus stop facilities. Consideration of potential LRT involvement in the site will also be briefly addressed. While the redevelopment area is primarily disturbed and occupied by contemporary buildings. there is always a chance of cultural resources in this type of area - near a river and near an older roadway corridor. On the north side of TH 13, there are a few parcels that appear to be undisturbed and may contain archaeological sites. Also, there is an older residential neighborhood which may include structures that could be visually affected by the redevelopment. To address these potential issues, we have included ar cost estimate from The 106 Group to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment. SCHEDULE Based upon our discussions with you, we anticipate that the AUAR Process will take approximately ten to tlvelve months to complete. This schedule allows time to refine the development scenario and proceed with traffic and environmental studies after the scenario is finalized. COST ESTIMATE AND BASIS OF PAYMENT The overall cost for the AUAR Process is estimated at approximately 588,000. This cost includes our traffic analysis, a Draft AUAR Document, a Final AUAR Document and Mitigation Plan, subconsultant costs and other direct expenses. The cost estimate is based on the attached Scope of Work and will not be exceeded without your approval. It is understood that if the scope or extent of work is adjusted at any time, the project cost will be adjusted accordingly. We propose to be reimbursed for our services on an hourly basis at a rate of 2.5 times salary cost for the actual time expended, and at actual cost for the out-of-pocket expenses and mileage (S0.345 per mile). Invoices will be submitted on a monthly basis for work performed during the previous month with payment due within 30 days. i Mr. Mike Ridley - 3 - March 20, 2001 NOTICE TO PROCEED A signed copy of this proposal returned to our office, or your verbal authorization, will serve as notice to proceed. We will begin the work immediately thereupon and will complete the project within a mutually agreed-upon time schedule. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this challenging project. Please feel free to contact us if additional information is needed. Sincerely, SRF C01SULTfNG GROUP, INC. Jennie J. Ross Ann M. Hopkins, AICP Principal Senior Associate JJR A'NIH'smf Attachment: ALTAR Work Tasks (Scope of Work) APPROVED: Name: Title: Date: r O L T m O x O Q ti . a a HJ y ~ Z Z a Z 0 0 0 ~ ° C U ri J x ZS Z a w ~ 0 a J Q' C Lo LO Ln U z W Z o ti. < LL W ~ a. S S N H - F- o o ° o 0 V; LL LL F H L a a J -J c > > L.J `n c h N Z < 0 O L U UU C, S _ h Q f - L Z_ C N_ ~Y - y O O cc p a' G N c N l0 N Q O ` 1. 1 E m a) L N d N Q< (9 c F .r 00 N y t9 = W W d i W O d u N N O r _ LL V) d O a C U L) E N a O _m W ca c U c> a) > U Z W U ~ N n O ? j-_O Og > L.N 5 a _ f0 N N 7 L N C N Q W c 3 J 3 N w d m a a> n o f N a `o m E w W m o G >c c Q a c 'n aa) =O N o ` Z c~ f0 m 3 a pZ w US o v a) CL a N c p c o N c c m a; O Zi ac m c~ N < O is < t c m co W Z m o d f Ev > J q E r o ~ c t-< c 'co a~a- <O E ~ d ~ v r m o O O. c t n U O J LL fa N Y T w H d m 0 Z O o > a ZO 0 0 3 aarj3 a c o.N m vQ ~O 4? ~I o> o ac m 4) •0 U y 2 A a o 5 E N n Lo - m c° E m ~c 3 w (%jl a v"mi d n D m c E r of N H H- Y< N o N ° .y M a, - z a~ _ or Ty d co acnyw > 3 c v, N 3 Z W c N Z a a~ ~p S c D H< J a' fa O a a j v C T a > - U< ~'D 3->=a=aH~ Umoam Z<< C75 Q) _ v i5 Q O O L< E m c c>> d> r a 'v c~ D Q Y m CL ° o N cca L 3 C _T T W H 0 3 c E L U U d Q z< W Z) p 1! y m S LL ~a 61 aa)i aN = y< a a U w a3 a =v E_ = o a a YY c c c m ~a 2= >HCnw E ° z C 2 m c c c 0 w a _ o y V) m m c c c :o m a LL U U 3 w a W?< - rLw a Lo 3~ _ r O F W Z, O N r? C z X: N N w OW J z Q' v a l < r r ~ ~ J d 'C ri ~~JyyI O C O O d Z wi 2 ~ a D z 0 0 o O O Q; Ce C) C1 _Z a w w r m a u J O O O O Z O LU O o a Q LL W C m 2 w O O O O U> LLy U C Z Z 1 C _ ? LL L^ L Z z Q O O U - U U O; Vi C O O O Q U z ' G < v N T N > N C 5 C O O m a) N r pU C L to ~p O Q m U E c . a N C n 3 `c c o° T ° o m o N y L-0 N U `oo. n E V) L V T M a ? U C d y N 0 C 3 'O M t Q) C y m fn 3 z 0 o t) E T->_' `c c .E m r `a Eat W 4: N O 9 O a) 3 C a) (p .y O y 19 N O N a) y C U n fa m C N O mot„ T n C T a) > N U 'p O' - y C 0 C C Q) o a) _o a a _ ' OU 7 ry O y f9 N c6 (a C c U o ~umi R C C C <p O O d N C 9 U S Y d m C O L> a CL M c n n ; E N N an d p N ~`a v y Q a a H a .E ~n m a c 3 Q A C a o a) C N N m C d Cpp N f0 t9 C E- 'D E 6 c- a QN 7 T a) (n 07 C 7 O m -0 C U Q fC0 0 O y a 0 H U 'U L43 N N L ` G E m T" j N Z, U ` y L U O y fa a) W a) C mGm ` Cl rL+ N O V f9 N N T (O y O > 3 C N c 4 = E u 3 c C p c t d o .E d E Q p 76 aci o 0 y m m C: -0 ~ y n> Q o a Z o ° U O y ON u a o o - O c d V Z LL a L) y c co r n f0 o f ° m C m o y c U co o m W r= y c E a~oi E n ~aci on N Cp $ c a) o o aU) ° Z O a m c > o a y as L E Q) N o ca m- _ c CT 3 a) W O U C N h N C m Z a) N G d O ` m C m Z m N O U c c °i co ca 3 > d c co o N d a y a) w m > n On N '0 c_° o c 5 CL = v Z c _9 M 0 B M° 2 c u 0 5 u Z W L O im In N C y (L) n - L_ ° 0 c fp E C N fC0 m d m N o € d Y m 4) E o CD > y y c w -0 o$ S a y' Ep -0 E o > N a' a Q E o E y - w c ac w a' CL o aci H E U o w c n c 0: Q T n N ° E d c E -0 2~ cu CL V) . L17 v° o a° _Z o Z c 3 E v m E c w G L 2 U - } 0 a t C Q C C fa N > C m D L a 2' Vi ;0 O C V) > U ~ W a~ o• a) 'a O> a) O O C > Z m 61 C U a. m N Q) E 1i N c U U Ir C- n. CU CU CJcn m Q- `hm 3 E.~D m oL d cY CG a C _ - r U Z N r) v n z O N N N N J C < U a I~ UO y J' - o Q - a u, O ~ O O ~ J W ~ a _ ~cc~ Z O ._A Ul a =O 2 -4 c p c o O CQ~; D CY Z, U' J 2' Z a w c~ =O Z (D w L O o a L) < c x_ U) - c c o o C: cn u.' LL: a Z Z a J w' o vr, N N OU v0 p. u=i Q c c c c J: J- Z - Z N p U O T - a G E N O< O .N E c c o E y d Q v? v ~ N N c c L m a°'~ = Q r c o c r c c c c m y a - N c c t M a) m io v E E E t :2 ate) o N L '3 ° 3 3° . N N y 7 0 Q'C N c a- Z Y C v) N C y U Q y j N ? p^ J ' u> d c o c a Z o E .N r ° a a°~ a~E a o " .c ° ° c ~a ? e c Ly ° c H c o o U ti c c, m 0 > C, CL F- d Z c c E U n 'y a) Z> ° h ° a°i y E E a M, u) to CL cn z 'a H = c a) O :r = C C C y N u) v d `1 y EE? j Q) C d d fV9 C V: w O ° m c ~p c cco y a) 4) ;n a~ .E .E c ac) 2 u v) Y ~ ,Z Oa ~ C 6) O z d Z. y a)'D O L N C O O _ y Z S N c) a c W y r O Q) 61 N J Ci d a) ,Q O_ O` O O^ d C N E U C_ T o w a U U L 41 C. Q) 3 N N 9 N = y N > N y C y$ U > 7 0 O C Q) F f0 4 O L F g 0 O > A 1 d~N E a) Q. J M D V d a) m d u fp L a N C _ w - N y° -C 0) v D m _`o E T E V) c d a ° O° E N E m 3 ,a E cm O Q' T O° n y N O C> C ° U O O O? N N N D C U y C C fp N O y C .C .N < ° a: c W p)~ U y C< 7 C C N 4 V N 'r _ Z Q O. L N U 'a r- d O Q la ) E 0 U N tC y y C 01 n V y U r!>pp O U L C% Z Q ? ~I V O. O G j 7 c 0 D_ N t0 E 6~) OV c. G O E N U D N = (9 Y, E a- m a) d ca m c_ v C o O f` ; U N C L L E 3 r> O O C N t C ^ C N v 'E L N O y N L C < C C a) N N N N y C E f0 O y E C N O N 5: w c m .g m .y 3 d 0 $ c E° 3 m c Z5 E y a t 'c v U° ° v c f o c d a) a E° a g y O N R c 0 Y. C .J C N C E .C O Q7 M N> W C O yO Q m< U U-3 U O O T Z y 0 a N o 7 O Y V d ~9 a) `O G O O y> y d E m r- In a v J uj 3' © C: 3 < O E.u m°c°Q.E.~ t~ m ou 4 N a) U v H w z Z n Y' N Cv cv cv LL O c!h J <; 13 C IA Ln O C t" i N d c < a F-~ a 1 Ln O O C 0 Q c L> cu Z LL o Lill _ .4 a ~ Z Q n o 0 0 o c O Z a w LIJ J = a N h p o 0 v o co co C~ Z W LL N 00 0 U - Q C' LL w C x x ~ o 0 0 0 o c o 0 v Li, u. Z H < J J W' C O C O O N N Z Z Q - fn Q. O O O O O O O J' f Q c Z _ C - . ~ c a a; ~ _ r _ Y C O 0 O L O C > a v 0 y C N C Q 9 a y ° O W Q v°', n £ 0 3~ x a o o a m a y c 0 n N y c` c = r° o E a v E c o c o to ` W a a c m r c p y Lr, d Cam) c CL a N 3 o E u ? c 0YO Q d N m> > CD- o - ~ co c c h Q L13 C w m E a~ ~ E ca m Q O M n - CA CU M Z to Q m c c a G :3 0 .0 o 0) 'o CN a3 y c C f c ° 0 o cg m ca > n a~ c> y W m a Z E m a~ '0 H m ono ~~~y 9 a> 3 n~ yv d Z' cv C m d o m L 3 0 > m E .00 r E E> i D y u y r coo 0 wm L x ~ m C d 9 ~ U p ~ W CL' E N o r 2 m o W~.0 U, a o m ~ 2) CL, a m` a~ ~ C,~ ~ y~- Q ~ ~ Y N E a mm a ~Um `0` _ n~~ L) Y uM W a~i m E S S S c E c c c E~ ° a c; d c z LO CL Z LU ~a 0 coi ai n a>i m m m m N 3 r d .0 - o a z ui v -0 ID *0 2:1 'FB M E :3 N O O O O O a L U H 'o to y c~a coo m E c m d X m aci v L>° c T W Q. N > v 0 0 0 2 - O- al c N O N z 3 v ti LL E m a m y m m m f0 m m m m an d a- o c N ^ T c _ U. d y .E aTi a aTi m m a~ m a > E Y m z a a- > a_ z a CL O 2° Q U U ci .5 U Y O U in U c in in in Q Y w a m ~ O zo. _ W Z O 17 cv 7 c n _ Z O ~ N ci ci of M r w U d H l~ r. aG N (D O N O Lr) N LL': - ~ N N N O i c ~ a V U C V f ~ O .-O O O O O O O Z w a Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 -C co O (3 C7 Z,, z n, w cy P u1. J O O - O O C T O M Ln Z L) w N r 00 L. a U Q r" LL i c. H H ~ O O O O O O O O O cn LL' LL O H ~ Z Q ~i J J O O W' N V h' O ~7 tt> O u'; In N ~ Q' _ Z 2 O O O U? C C C C O O tI'7 N C J' U~ _ Z v c c f L c = N 3 E ; m 3 cc m F ~ y Q C L F- Q) r > Q (J N ro U C^ d v; c iv h E E _ E> Q Z) vi ? c 2 Q) ° c N O O> 3 cc N c h C U E U m Ci .C ui c N c c - c _ w m h .N a L o g U G u ° y U H 0 C w C O p - m ~ 0: c a n co z M o 3 c > .c e C a E n Ea E'a m Y o m o N Za c o lm ` y y Q Q aNi a Q Q a N Q y> C c d H to a y w an d > O Of O E J N E U c 'v d O c J crp J Q 6 c r ~ CaC A Q c O Z ` U > Z 2 ac > y E O 3 a Q r0 pap H y y N V) OJ a 0) v N C N W N c y w ~i c _ fn > Q a O_ r -Z W al m m c O U y t o c _ m a Q h o m a L W co u Q Q n Q m e _ o y~ 3 H oc tY E 0aN _ Z w - E N E co Q E° y u c_ N y Q O 3 u - E g a°ti tai Q Z a a° w ¢ v a m E > 5 m d w E _`m a> LL C9 H c o f m t > t- ti y E d ) H 3 Q N- p M a) ° a tr Y: a E a Z a o m Q O u c 3 c_ F Y p m OC) ma -E LD Y y Q a Q c W U a .2? C) Q E; 3 r h- w 3 -y a E o d O ° >y ¢ O ° cn d a~ 5 U U c c m a 3 Q 2Q-a ac 0- 0- mQ3cncna~~ti r - H W Z n W Q) ~ O " N O ~ - 2 'Oi r> r~ r'i ~vj V V 'n - w m LY Q; U a F 1 n o kn U) o Ln u~ o Ln o D) N M C ~ Q s ~ N Lr) N cl O O O cn LL, UI U O • 2 w S a -a o cn o 0 0 0 0 0 N O co ~ G cn z J w a J O d Hi = O ur O Lr) O O Ln m co y U W to N m z 00 a Q LL W LL h H - ~ C O O O o O O O o :n LL ' W ~ Z z _ J _ W' O C cn O LM C O N L N Z Q.. th N N 00 0 U Q LO Z to Q z Z O O O C C O C O O J Q C Z _ G ~ Z S i z G O y O rJ ° E 0. c V) 5 75 L 3 N E L 5 Q y C_7 to ° ca a N O 47 _c a) Q U a a T L L a T E M V C L a' E j C t d O C m y U o ? o a 3.1 U o o c 0 76 p m Q N W m ° r- c m E r E N > aE a E~ N V) Ha o'c g C v u~ Q f9 N = c fC H N Y vi ? Q t9 m Q N iA Q c vi a s y E o c H i V~y N C C 'V M Q J C= oc f0 Z c E 92 v,>m t= vcia °a--- cca E ° H ui v, E > 3 c co y a a° O 7, 8 p~ c Q) 0 5D E h o~ E `c E - c H o c c G] Z, v 0 $ d d a~ o Q ~ a cm 0 E E c m o c°f H uj (D 10 'D W ~ '9 C H d U U 6U7 10 0 c o E coo N o c c c E o aai w Q) a E ;g co ca _ g` Q o a m (n E u c E H a a u c c z Q W a y o cn vi 0 0) 0 10 8' co co z a Q 4) Q O c m U v n cco o io m U co c E h m _ W m L E o 8 H of r O LL Y' d o v a~ a 3 E E v o Q _v o H W a E Vi > d m ~ Q UO d H f~ f9 N ° 0 d v v a a a Q a a s o 2 c w - z Lr) (D 0) 2 y u LO cri Sri LO uri v; ui W O LO J Q' < v a I~ i N IT N a n N o 0 0 0 o c c Q: Pf (D (.C Pf II v O If) Ln O O O N d O co O m II m N N N Cl) N ~ (`7 C7 11 > T II 69 fA 69 69 69 69 b9 N II I a, m II 69 69 I CC) 64 s r' 69 M II II t a II II a r; 11 U C ` cl J N n a Q ~ Cli N ~j L O s 69 z - = JI a UI O z to ° o c 0 Q. O T W LO cd C9 O 69 z a w O rl = ° p 0 0 o v o z C7 w 4n w (h o LL' w 64 C LL W Q 69 E N 2 m 0 0 0 (n C) b9 U Q ) (c V7 z y a a n o L) Lr, a c ~ O ti cx 0 o c 0 r) Ln o V) g ti Z Z Q N O O O fJ N C R OU C 609 > vj C: M Lr a y fi to J, m ° E c ds b9 L t = = a o z a s d ( < ? p (Y a Z - C G - F - v c 1111 U C LL t- c - 5 I to V) U O a w w V) z M a a a y O W W Z > W > r 7 W w W = Q a z J Z! c W J w p ZO U ~ (o X aiJ J OI y Z O Z W Z LAJ > d1' W J z Q W LIJ z co LLI a z LL g Z W W Q U W U a Z r W W a m Q fn Z r O Z c Q a Q H = O p r z u U z p C W C7 yyj w r w w c U ? Q Z r LU Z, LLO Y J a Q Q J W Q Q W Q Z a Q a a w Z U o a r w r D ED O N s U U w w LL a U v LL O z r w r F U z a _ z n Y W_ 0 V) J C Q w U d F- (7 1 w CD 0 0 to Q CI V II N ~ /T f- 00 W, ~D !'7 II oc O Iq to h m C1 m II N 1.- In N fD . f'f W II ` ~o a 69 9 6 69 44 ~ M ~ M a+ - u C Q 60 f 69 69 O IN 0) fh Fri H VJ Z O wl 2 a ~ z O O ~ °6A °o ° 00 °o J 664 K M~9 Z a w c~ J =O G DX X C 0 0 0 cOD ON z 0 W O N O 1~ (D tD O o d Z7 ' U Q G': 69 69 69 ILL Q' = G to - ~ 0 0 0 0 0 O Li. K 69 69 69 b9 69 W Z Z V) J J W O O O O O O N N Q ~ o~ 0 0 0 00 U 69~~aa° U co N' 69 69 b9 2 ~ VT z - < z - Ooo nO n 69 69 69 h 69 r` Q - G < J. Z z ~ z z G - Q Q N V) W W OU W CL Li W O z Q z W Q W O w z a w > m w g a z, ? Cl) g w_ o Z D > z > W z° w w Q LLJ z z z¢~►_Z m z O _ W cn LL wz °w Ld p ILL U Z _ Y~ C) U_ ~ _ < W Z LL Z w Q az(r O U) cn O = U U w W 1- F- CL O w w F- - F W _ G w Z o O o 0 o ` N z I t H N c v O N, cn U a < O 106 group ltd. cultural resources rnanaQement March 19, 2001 Ann M. Hopkins, AICP Senior Associate SRF Consulting Group, Inc. One Carlson Parkway North Suite 150 Minneapolis, MIS 55447-4443 Re: Cultural Resources Assessment Scope of ;F ork for the Proposed Cedar Grove A UAR, Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Dear Ann: On behalf of The 106 Group Ltd., I am pleased to submit a proposal for the cultural resources assessment for the proposed Cedar Grove AL;A.R, Dakota Count}, Mimiesom. This preliminary survey, will determine if there are any known cultural properties within the study area and if there is a potential to find any unknown resources. If the project should receive federal funding or permits, it must comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and with other applicable federal and state mandates. While the proposed cultural resources assessment work will not include documenting the eligibility of and effects to historic properties, it will provide the basis for determining an appropriate scope of any Phase I survey work that may be necessary to comply with Section 106. The goal of this assessment, therefore, will be to determine which areas will require Phase I archaeological testing and which structures or historical resources will require further investigation. The study will include the following tasks: • Background research at the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) to identify- all known precontact and post contact archaeological sites, all buildings and structures over 50 years of age, and all cultural resources surveys that have been conducted within a one-mile radius of the project area. • A preliminary windshield survey of the project area will be conducted. We request that SRF or the City of Eagan obtain all necessary landowner permission to access private property. Areas that demonstrate a high potential for containing intact archaeological sites will be identified. A preliminary study area for architectural lo % St. Y~ul. %f\ c_ bt:p Tel' 651.290.0977 FoN iq 1 ivo u~iJuF LTD resources will also be determined during the survey. During the survey, any extant buildings and structures over 50 years of age in the study area will be identified and photographed. • A brief report will be prepared describing project methodology, previous investigations, results, and recommendations. The report will include one graphic showing the location of any areas assessed as having a high potential for containing archaeological sites, as well as architectural or historical resources that may require further evaluation, if any. • The Project Manager will be responsible for communicating all cultural resources issues to SRF, SHPO, and other appropriate agencies. The Project 'Tanager will keep SRF closely informed about the project status. • No meetings are anticipated at this stage. If attendance at meetings is requested, it will be invoiced on a time and materials basis. • The study can be initiated once a service agreement./notice to proceed is received. The field assessment and report can be completed within four weeks of receiving the service agreement. This consultation can be completed by The 106 Group for an amount not to exceed S2,320 (see attached spreadsheet). 'We arpreciate this opportunity to work with SRF on this project. If voL }iavc ar,% q:<est:oas or require further information please do not hesitate to call tne. Sincerely. THE 106 GROUP LTD. wKristen M. Zschomler Senior Arch aeologist/Histori an and Project :Manager 6C KEY PROJECT PERSONNEL Kristen 111. Zschomler, M.A., RPA Over the past ten years, Kristen Zschomler has supervised and participated in numerous prehistoric and historical archaeology projects throughout the Midwest, Southeast. and the Caribbean. Archaeological studies have ranged from several cultural resources assessments and Phase I archaeology surveys for bicycle trails in Minnesota; to survey of to test' . 1 Inc, the Denis Bay Sugar Plantation Historic District, United States Virgin Islands- at the Parris Island Military Base, South Carolina: to a data recovery at a Late Archaic/Late Woodland site in Alabama. Kristen is member of the Register of Professional Archaeologist (RPA) and has a focus on fur trade period archaeology. She recently co-authored a paper on trade bead chronology in Minnesota at the joint Plains/Midwest Conference. Kristen has also served as historian and architectural historia-i on various evaluations of eligibility, surveys, in-depth historic context studies. and NABS/HAER projects. Examples of historical and architectural projects include the evaluation of over 350 structures in Eufaula, Alabama; the archival mitigation report on pipeline crossing of the Illinois and Michigan Canal near Channahon. Illinois; the Illinois HABS Level III recordation of a Midwestern Feeder swine barn in Techny. Elirois, aria the HABS Level I recordation of five Memorial bridges in Alabama. Kristen has been actively involved in the preparation of educational outreach materials and teaching guides for archaeology in Minnesota and Alabama. She meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology, architectural history. ar- history William Stark, M. A. %Vill has ser-,ed as architectural historian on numerous cultural resources project n Minnesota, North Dakota and New York, inclt:ding the Faribaalt County Unity Traii cultural resources assessment, the Phase I survey of the New Northside, Redeve'.cprnent project in `Minneapolis, the Phase U survey of the Williams-Rucker Farmstead in Olmsted Cor:nty, and the evaluation of eligibility for the Student Health Service building on the St. Paul University of Minnesota campus. Will has served as a re-use study tearn member for Dania Hall in Minneapolis, and will be a lead member for cultural resources interpretation for the Historic Bluff Country Scenic Byway project. At the historic Split Rock Lighthouse, he will be researching the historic evolution of the site's dwellings and managing the analysis of historic materials. Will is a graduate of Cornell University's graduate program in Historic Preservation Planning where he studied historic survey and documentation techniques, preservation law, Geographical Information System (GIS ) technology, and real estate principles. Will's thesis research concerned the economic and architectural feasibility of the adaptive reuse of downtown department stores. His preservation experience also includes an internship with the Minnesota SHPO. Additionally, Will has 10 years of experience working in human resources management. He meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for architectural history and history. c;21 i ant 106 VKI~Ur LTD C= SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Grand Oak Business Park AUAR, Cultural Resources Assessment, Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota. Conducted a cultural resources assessment for the Grand Oak Business Park AL''AR, which included the construction of light industrial and office buildings in Eagan, Minnesota. None of the architectural properties were recommended for further investigation. Some areas were determined to have moderate to high potential for containing intact archaeological sites, as were recommended for survey work if it was determined that they would be impacted by the proposed development. Wakota Bridge Phase I Cultural Resources Survey, Washington, Dakota, acid Ramsey Counties, Minnesota. Undertaken as part of the planning for reconstruction of the Wakota Bridge and parts of I-494 and TH 61, staff members completed a Phases I and E cultural resources survey and evaluation along an approximately nine mile corridor in South St. Paul. Newport and St. Paul Park. The project included development of historic contexts and evaluation of National Register eligibility for two farmsteads. two cemeteries, two houses, a library, and a railroad switching tower. Prepared for the %1innesota Department of Transportation Soo Line Abandonment, Dakota County, 'Minnesota. Conducted Phase III cultural resources mitigation documentation of a 4.2 mile corridor of Soo Line rail track in Mendota, Minnesota using innovative application of the SecretarZ, of the Interior' Standards and Guidelines for Historical Documentation. Following these guidelines. the surVev report included recommendations for public historical interpretation of this aba-doned railroad line prior to conversion to a recreational bike trail. Prepared for Dakota Countv and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Historic American Engineering Record Documentation, Bridge No. 5820 Cloverleaf Interchange, Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County, Minnesota. Prepared HAER documentation :n compliance with Section 106 for Bridge 5820, a continuous rei :forc.e.J concrete deck girder bridge constructed in 1940 and believed to be the first cloverleaf interchange constructed in Minnesota. Prepared for Dakota County and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Fernbrook/Cheshiire Lane EAW Cultural Resources Assessment, Hennepin County. Minnesota. The 106 Group Ltd. conducted a preliminary cultural resources assessmer:- survey as part of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Fernbrook/Cheshire Lane project for SRF Consulting Group, Inc., on behalf of The Cite of Plymouth. The proposed one-mile long roadway corridor was recommended as havin7 moderate to high potential for containing previously unidentified archaeological sites due to its proximity to extensive wetlands and Lake Pomerleau and the relatively undisturbed nature of the area. Two farm complexes were recorded during this cultural resources assessment, one of which included a raised barn that exhibited qualities or characteristics that would make it potentially eligible for listing on the NRHP, resulting :n the recommendation for further investigation on the barn, 1999. as dUJ J THE 106 GKUUF LTD C C ~ h f~9 f. ~ N v K O ~ In v1 A V C L 7 O C ~ r r C Ci .7 GA C 10 . d t N so V ? 6 1 M b L' ~ oc a OC ~ ~ J^ c - r OC 00 K to c _ c oc W ~ T f: ~ 7 > z C ~0 o - Q ~ s v z ~ d'0 t Agenda Information Memo May 1, 2001 Eagan Economic Development Authority Meeting V. APPROVE CONTRACT FOR CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA INSPECTION SERVICES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a resolution approving a contract with SEH for Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area eligibility inspections. FACTS: • Staff and project management consultant Ehlers and Associates are preparing the necessary documentation to create a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Redevelopment District for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. One of the most important first steps is the qualification of properties for the proposed district. State statutes require that a majority of properties within a redevelopment district must be deemed structurally substandard. The City may not make a determination that a property is structurally substandard without an interior inspection of the property. • The fire of SEH has submitted a proposal to the City to perform the necessary property assessment inspections to determine the eligibility of properties contained within a Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area TIF District. SEH proposes a maximum fee of S29,600 to perform the inspections and prepare required documentation. • Ehlers believes that SEH is qualified to perform the inspections and advises that the project cost estimate is very reasonable for the service. • As required by law, the attached resolution also states the EDA's intent to have the City be reimbursed for the cost of the inspections by Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues generated as a result of new development in the Area. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution is attached on page • SEH proposal is attached on pageso throughm. "NO a~ EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY RESOLUTION TO APPROVE CONTRACT WITH THE FIRM OF SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSON INC. (SEH) FOR CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA ELIGIBILITY INSPECTIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Eagan Economic Development Authority to approve a contract in the amount of $29,600 with SEH for the purpose of performing redevelopment eligibility assessment inspections in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the EDA intends to reimburse this administrative expenditure with Tax Increment Financing (TIF) revenues from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Jamie Verbrugge, Secretary/Assistant Executive Director of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the Authority in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 1 S` day of May, 2001. James D. Verbrugge, Secretary a~ AW ~ 3535 Vadnais Censer C,, ve. S: Fa- MN 55'"1D-5196 651 49C, 2000 ESl 49C 2.5: SAX arrhi~rcturi rpir,rrr;r, i1t:iIr.7,rrlT;fl' ha72 April 19, 2001 RE: City of Eagan, Minnesota Property Redevelopment Assessments SEH No. P-EAGA0104.00 Mr. Jamie Verbrugge Assistant City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan. MN 55122 Dear Jamie: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.@ (SEH) submits this proposal for professional services for Property Redevelopment Eligibility Assessments. We have thoroughly researched your request and feel this fee will provide you the documentation necessary to comply with the required statutes. We have completed very similar building/property condition surveys; however, as you are aware, we have not provided this exact service to clients in the past. Therefore, this estimate is based largely on information provided by YHR. use of GIS as the data gathering tool, removal of redundant tasks and a "keep it simple" format. We are hoping that we can deliver these services for less than the estimate; however, due to our lack of historical fee estimate comparisons this is our best attempt at probable cost for this work. The cost for conducting the assessments is estimated to be $29,600. Compensation shall be on an hourly basis to the established maximum fee. not including ordinary reimbursable expenses. We have estimated the work to take about 45 to 60 days to complete starting from the time you issue a Notice to Proceed. Included in this submittal is a Work Plan that itemizes tasks, hours and fee estimates for each major task. Also included is a sample of the GIS base tool we propose to use to enter data while in the field. The field data will be entered into the GIS system through a hand held computer that allows easy access to all the GIS information entered prior to fieldwork. This will eliminate the task of reentry (and potential errors) of hand written field data into the GIS system back in the office. We look forward to working with you on this project. Should you have any questions regarding this submittal please do not hesitate to call me at 651-490-2087 or email me at nschultz@sehinc.com. Sincerely, Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Nan , S utl , Princi nager, Architectural Services S1 G VmukeN-E4GAN082200 doc Short Elliott Hendncksc- Inc Offices located throughout the Upper Midv.est EQua, Opper'-- E7p c.e R1 help )ou plan. desicr,. and achicrc. aL-0 EAGAN REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENTS PROJECT TASKS & FEE SCHEDULE April 19, 2001 ID TASK NAME HOURS COST ' TOTAL PROJECT SUMMARY 549 hrs $29,673.00 2 3 CONTRACT MANAGEMENT 35 hrs $3,209.00 4 Project Set-up (Schedule, Invoices, Contract, Files, Budgets) 16 hrs $1,232.00 5 Kick-off Meeting (Meeting #1) 6 hrs $495.00 6 Establish Expectationsl roles and responsibilities 0 hrs $0.00 7 Establish Notification Protocol 0 hrs $0.00 8 Confirm Schedules and Critical Path Milestones 0 hrs $0.00 9 Budget & Scope Review 0 hrs $0.00 10 Project Management Tasks updates ( Weekly schedule, Budget, Billings) 13 hrs' $1,482.00 11 Weekly review (Schedule, Budget, Staffing) 10 hrs $1,140.00 22 Monthly billing reports 3 hrs ! $342.00 26 27 28 PRELIMINARY PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 270 hrs' $13,160.00 29 Gather Background Information 90 hrs i $4,200.00 30 Existing site aerial or survey for properties 0 hrs $0.00 I 31 Building Permits - actual or log of permits 0 hrs $0.00 32 Determine Right-of-Way locations to center line of right of ways for each parcel 0 hrs' $0.00 I 33 Age of each facility 0 hrs $0.00 34 Occupancy Type of Each Property 0 hrs $0.00 35 Number of Stories for each Facility 0 hrs $0.00 36 Current value of each property and facility 0 hrs $0.00 37 GIS base parcel data 0 hrs $0.00 38 Last sale of each properties 0 hrs $0.00 39 Preliminary determination (GIS data entry) of following property conditions: 180 hrs $8,960.00 40 Total Parcel area 0 hrs $0.00 41 Total Right of Way area 0 hrs $0.00 42 Building(s) Foot print area 0 hrs $0.00 43 Building(s) Foot print in Right of Way 0 hrs $0.00 44 Paving area I 0 hrs $0.00 45 Other improved area 0 hrs $0.00 Page 1 a7 EAGAN REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENTS PROJECT TASKS & FEE SCHEDULE April 19, 2001 ID TASK NAME HOURS COST 46 UBC/International Code Classification 0 hrs 50.00 47 Occupancy Type 0 hrs' S0.00 48 Construction Type 0 hrs $0.00 49 Number of Stories 0 hrs $0.00 50 Current Replacement Value 0 hrs $0.00 51 Current Resale Value of Property 0 hrs $0.00 52 Total Site Coverage 0 hrs $0.00 53 Last Sale of Parcel 0 hrs $0.00 54 Site Address and Owner 0 hrs $0.00 55 56 57 FIELD SURVEY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS 148 hrs $7,504.00 58 Improved Property Survey 64 hrs $3,072.00 59 Verification of building footprint for each property 0 hrs $0.00 60 Verification of Paved Areas for each property 0 hrs ! $0.00 61 Verification for other improved areas for each property 0 hrs $0.00 62 Verification of Buildings on Right of Ways 0 hrs' $0.00 63 Photo survey of existing conditions (four sides, no interiors) 0 hrs. $0.00 64 Regulatory Deficiencies Survey 84 hrs $4,432.00 65 Exterior Envelope Deficiencies 0 hrs $0.00 66 Interior Deficiency 0 hrs $0.00 67 68 69 FINAL ELIGIBILITY REPORT 96 hrs ! $5,800.00 70 Completion of GIS data entry not entered during field survey 32 hrs' $1,808.00 71 Preliminary Eligibility Report 24 hrs $1,272.00 72 Meeting with Owner to Review Preliminary Report (Meeting #2) 16 hrs $1,456.00 73 Revisions to Report based on Owner review 24 hrs $1,264.00 74 Final submittal of Eligibility Report 0 hrs $0.00 75 Description of the Process used including logs of owner notifications 0 hrs $0.00 Page 2 a$ Ima pocketpc Jaa-~ + -~~--Q - f -AMID 12 k ,.-doe x 278422.9 1841569.6 JFUS 1:16330 F 3 01q 1 i. 1t- CITY OF EAGAN BACKGROUND INFORMATION FORM *Please type or print clearly in ink Ronald F. Moening April 18, 2001 Name Date In order that the Mayor and Councilmembers have a better understanding of your background and interests, please provide the following information: (Attach extra sheets if necessary). Home Address 11378 Louisiana Circle Phone (H) (952) 944-9321 Zip Code Bloomington, MN 55438 How long have you lived in Eagan? years Employer Waste Management Occupation District Manager Phone(W) (952) 882-2327 Please indicate which Committees/Commissions you are applying for. List only those you would be seriously interested in serving on. Waste Reduction and I" Choice Recycling Commission 2"d Choice 3rd Choice 4th Choice Prior experience on City Commissions, City Boards, etc. Five (5) years on the above board. (Please complete both sides of application) 1 Provide a short paragraph summarizing why you are seeking an appointment to a Commission in the City of Eagan. Hauler Representative Briefly describe your background, experience and any other information not previously given which you believe should be considered regarding the appointment you are seeking. I have 27 years in Solid Waste Industry, 5 of those years I served on the Eagan Waste Reduction and Recycling Commission. I resigned from the board when I left the Solid Waste Industry. I am now back in the industry and am applying for the open position. Return to: City Administrator Date Received City of Eagan (For Office Use Only) 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Telephone: (651) 681-4613 Fax: (651) 681-4612 i