10/02/2001 - City Council Regular
AGENDA
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING /
EAGrkN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING
OCTOBER 2, 2001
6:30 P.M.
1. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
H. ADOPT AGENDA
III. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
Fp. AAPPROVE MINUTES
1 p B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
/ C. APPROVE Temporary Liquor License - Faithful Shepherd Catholic School
D' SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent Utilities
E. SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent False Alarm Bills
y F. SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent Weed Cutting Bills
/SAG. APPROVE 2002 Funding Application to Dakota County for the Community Landfill Abatement
Funds.
~/6 H. DIRECT Staff to Prepare an Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 11 to Provide for Waste Transfer
Stations as a Conditional Use in the I-1 Zoning District.
/9/71. APPROVE Final Subdivision, Four Paws Addition - Four Paws Pet Resort
I~'C1 J. APPROVE Purchase Agreement - 2246 Clark Street
K. APPROVE Purchase Agreement - 4185 Strawberry Lane
L. APPROVE Easement Agreement for Project 771, Studio 3345 (Lexington Avenue - Street &
Utility Improvements).
tl ~am. APPROVE Resolution to Implement Project 800 (Cedar Grove Access Reconfiguration) upon
/ Approval of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funding
N. APPROVAL Resolution to Implement Project 859 (TH 55/Lexington Ave/Blue Gentian Rd -
Intersection Reconfiguration) upon Approval of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funding
P~ y O. APPROVAL Resolution to Implement Project 860 (TH 55/Blue Water Rd - Intersection
Reconfiguration) upon Approval of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funding
OP. AUTHORIZE Traffic Control Study, Cliff Lake Rd & Kyle Way
WQ. APPROVE Change Order No. 2 to Contract 01-07 (Lexington Ave - Street & Utility
1 Improvements)
P.33 R. AUTHORIZE Feasibility Report for Project 861 (2002 City-Wide Trail Improvements)
S. APPROVE Change Order No. 1 to Contract 01-14 (Storm Mitigation Improvements, Beaver
Y 3 Dam & Bear Path)
T. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 840 and Schedule Public Hearing (Robin Lane - Storm
Mitigation Improvements)
3C~ U. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 843 and Schedule Public Hearing (Beecher Drive -
Storm Mitigation Improvements
VQ V. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 844 and Schedule Public Hearing (Forssa Way - Storm
Mitigation Improvements)
~L~(1 W. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 845 and Schedule Public Hearing (Rocky Lane/Paddock
Court - Storm Mitigation Improvements)
YZ X. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 810 (Lift Station Upgrades - City Wide) and Authorize
Preparation of Plans & Specifications
p FY. APPROVE Contract with Decision Resources for Golf Course Questionnaire & Survey
PS07 APPROVE Status of Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau (ECVB) as a separate 501(c) &
APPROVE Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws
fee
PROCLAIM October as Toastmasters Month
BB. APPROVE Subgrantee Agreement with the Dakota County CDA for the administration of
C CBDG funds designated by the City Council for Fiscal Year 2001.
CC. ADOPT Resolution/Order to Initiate Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for Blue
•7 Cross/Blue Shield East Campus.
~DD. Approve Telecommunications Lease Agreement, Verizon Inc. (Southern Lakes Water Tower -
v Antennae)
V. 6:30 - PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. VACATE Easement, Sun Cliff 15t Addition (Lot 13, Block 1)
6 B. VARIANCE, RAJ Khanchandani - Variance to allow 7-foot building setback (30' standard)
o from a public right-of-way (Timberwolf Trail) and a Variance of 1.4% from the 20% lot
coverage allowed in a residential zoning district for Lot 13, Block 1, Suncliff I" Addition,
located at 4277 Sunrise Road in the NE of Section 29.
SC. CONSIDER ADOPTION of Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, an
Establishing Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment
Area; and Adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore.
I VD. VACATE Easement, Harvey's Heritage Addition, Lot 3, Block 1
V E. VACATE Easement, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 (Lots 1 & 2, Block 4) & 4 (Lots 1-
3, Block 2)
/ F. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 748, Johnny Cake Ridge Rd (Street & Utilities)
q 5G. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 797, Letendre 1 & 2 Additions (Street & Utilities)
aO~H. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 798, Canterbury Forest/Wedgewood I" Addition
J (Street & Utility Improvements)
VI. OLD BUSINESS
IA. REVIEW Proposed Amendment to Scope of Project, Project 751 (Dodd Rd, Cliff Rd to 120`s St
- Streets & Utilities)
n a~ ?B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING & PRELIMINARY
IQJ SUBDIVISION - Shelter Corporation. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment amending the
use of approximately 17 acres from RC, Retail Commercial to MD, Medium Density Residential,
a Rezoning from CSC (Commercial Shopping Center) to PD (Planned Development) and a
Preliminary Subdivision/Preliminary Planned Development (Cedar Villas) to create two lots with
158 townhome units, located on the west side of Nicols Road, south of Jerry's Garden Center and
north of the Sleep Inn in the NW of Section 30
VII. NEW BUSINESS
PQ)q A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Adams Outdoor Advertising. A Conditional Use Permit to
allow a single sided off-premise pylon sign on Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way, south of
Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue in the NW of Section 2
~Q aB. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - Duke Realty Corporation. A Preliminary Subdivision
(Eagan Preserve) of approximately 20.66 acres to create two lots and three outlots, located on the
III north side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lockheed Martin in the south '/2 of Section 9
nab. RECEIVE/CONSIDER PETITION, Stop Sign Installation (Diamond Drive and Garnet Lane)
VIII. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE
IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA
A. Comments by City Council, City Administrator, and Department Heads
X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda)
XI. ADJOURNMENT
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities,
facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital
status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will
be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan
will attempt to provide such aid.
u
ati MEMO
city of eagan
MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 2, 2001 CITY COUNCIL
MEETING
ADOPT AGENDA
After approval is given to the October 2, 2001 City Council agenda, the following items are in
order for consideration.
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
CONSENT AGENDA
The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the
City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed
from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is
brief.
A. APPROVE MINUTES
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the minutes of the September 17, 2001 regular City Council meeting as presented or
modified.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Minutes of the September 17, 2001 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages
3 through
C2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
Eagan, Minnesota
September 17, 2001
A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Monday, September 17, 2001 at 6:30 p.m: at the
Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Bakken, Carlson, Fields and Tilley.
Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom
Colbert, and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. .
AGENDA
Mayor Awada, Councilmeipber Till%*W: a :{:$at Items H, I, K; and L be pulled from the
%
$t Item Y of the Consent Agenda be
Consent Agenda for discussion. Public Wotlig•ticeiiK~f:
removed from the agenda.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Co ember Fields seconded a motion to approve the agenda as
amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
PROCLAM.4;•~;#~DN OF PREVENTION WEEK
PROCLAMATION OfATIONyALLEN FIRE FIGHTER WEEK
City Administrator Hedges introdub these it4igregarding Fire Prevention Week and National Fallen
Fire Fighter Week. Fire Chief Craig Jense4: ,b ir,
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmemtier 15iueii• seCBfided a motion to adopt the City of Eagan's
Annual Proclamation declaring October 7 - 13, 2001 as Fire Prevention Week for the City of Eagan.
Ayes: 5 Nay: 0
Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a njotion to adopt a Proclamation proclaiming
October 8, 9 and 10 as Fallen Firefighters Memorial Days. ;ay: 0
A
Councilmember Bakken moved, Costoiuber Tifky seconded a motion to approve the balance of the
consent agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
A. Minutes. It was recommended to approve the minutes of thi'-iitiii'ust 28, 2001 Special City Council meeting,
the September 4, 2001 Regular City Council meeting and the September 11, 2001 Special City Council meeting:
B. Personnel Items.
1. It was recommended to accept the resignation of William Bruestle, Senior Inspector for the Community
Development Department.
2. It was recommended to approve the rpf~nthony Lejcher, Matthew Ondrey and Sean Sweeney as police
officers for the City of Eagan Polic
3. It was recommended to approve t1* g o •are~st City Clerk /Administrative Services
Coordinator.
4. It was recommended to approve tlw. }firing of (Qpen Mathiason as a temporary preschool program instructor
RN.
.
for the Parks and Recreational Deient.
5. It was recommended to approve tTs q.i`idf,{$s.ynda Speikers and Cynthia Whitacre as
temporary preschool assistants fo't$ir'Y~S~aiiif'1+Ed>z: tepartment.
6. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Cyndi Huonder and Lori Huckle as seasonal preschool
• instructors for the Parks and Recreation Department.
7. It was recommended to approve the hiring of David Schomburg, Brad Champlin and Bruce Berry as
temporary basketball scorekeepers for the F,atits and Recreation Department.
8. It was recommended to approve the t qn, Jeff Freeman and Ken Freeman as football
officials for the Parks and RecreatimiW"' ieht.%
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
September 17, 2001
Page 2
C. Shows License. It was recommended to approve a Shows License for Starks Halfway House Saloon for
Saturday, September 22, 2001 at 3125 Dodd Road.
D. Name Change - On Sale Beer License. It was recommended,to approve a name change for an ON-Sale Beer
License from Park-view Golf Club, LLC to Parkview Golf Holdings, LLC.
E. Alternative Urban Areawide Review. It was recommended to approve the Resolution / Order to initiate an
Alternative Urban Areawide Review for thrQtdar Grove Redevelopment Area.
F. >A►uditinQ Servic6s. It was recommended td; rove the engagement letter with Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. to
provide auditing services for the year endiflecember 31, 2001.
G. Final Subdivision - TCA. It was recommQ r 'RX%"bdivision (Tran4port America Addition)
lcg;_q{ot?iid in the SE of Section 8.
located at the intersection of Terminal Dri
J. Proiect 668. Lone Oak Road Final Assessment Roll. It was recommended to receive the Final Assessment Roll
for Project 668 (Lone Oak Road Reconstr[irijapn / Upgrade - Lexington Avenue to Highway 55 / 149) and
schedule a public hearing to be held on OoiQlier 16, 2001.
M. Project 759R. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 759R (Beau
D'Rue - Street and Trail Improvements) by the City's consulting engineering firm of Short - Elliot-Henrickson,
Inc.
N. Project 801. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 801 (Silver
Bell Road - Street Improvements) by the: ;Ws consulting engineering firm of WSB & Associates (WSB).
0. Project 794. It was recommended to auth&." the pre lion of a Feasibility Report for Project 794 (River Hills
9' Addition - Street Improvements) by t):se;ity's cojting engineering firm of WSB &Associates.
P. Project 795. It was recommended to aut] a the pr tation of a Feasibility Report for Project 795 (Beacon
Hill, Brittany ? - 6' Additions, Johnny Ca,4_ .Ai,dFA Yh Additions, and Covington Lane - Street
Improvements) by the City of Eagan Enoj,2 'd
Q. Project 796. It was recommended to autfiori~e tlie'pfdpatatibe'okxeasibility Report for Project 796 (Cedar
Cliff Additions and Mari Acres Additions - Street Improvements) by the City's consulting engineering firm of
WSB & Associates.
R. Project 851. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Traffic Study and Feasibility Report for
Project 851 (Town Centre, Denmark Avenue, Duckwood Drive, Krestwood Lane, Crestridge Dirve - Street and
Trail Improvements) by the City's consulting engineering farm of Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.
S. Project 852. It was recommended to authorize the prep,3ratti?7tic easibility Report for Project 852 (Post
Additions, Rustic Hills Drive, and Oster Drjyp.%: eoT;# irbvements) by the City's consulting engineering firm
of WSB & Associates.
T. Project 853. It was recommended to autlioriz,~e preparaeln of a Feasibility Report for Project 853 (Woodgate
? Addition - Street Improvements) by the: 3lji a ~ .ftineering Division.
U. Project 854. It was recommended to authorize th'e' %of a Feasibili ty Report for Project 854 (Parkcliff
1'- 3rd Additions -Street Improvements) by the City of2}i3 ineering Division.
V. Project 855. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of Feasibility Report for Project-855 (Oak
Chase 4' and 6`" Additions and Ches Mar East ? - 5`s Additions - Street Improvements) by the City of Eagan
Engineering Division.
W. Project 856. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 856 (Ches Mar
1" - 5' Additions - Street Improvements) bey the City of Eagan Engineering Division.
X. Effress Addition Easement Vacation. It,t:fcq!Igmen&>ive the petition to vacate public drainage and
utility easements and schedule a publit.)4~g'~3beM$ A-*[$(ober 16, 2001.
Y. Contract 01-04. The ro osed Amen t to Aw *°'Contract 01-04 Central Parkwa / Northwood Parkway
p P t ( Y Y
& Community Center- Street, UtilitX.~ Grading Wrovements) was removed from the agenda with no action
taken due to lack of required easeme....
Z. Project 858. It was recommended to tit4: 41 Fart orize the preparation of a feasibility report by
the City Engineer for Project 858 (Siik- Storm Sewer Improvements).
AA. Projects 00-H & 00-I. It was recommended to approve the extension of the development contract for Pinetree
Pass 5' Addition and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents.
BB. Contract 00-07. It was recommended to approve Change Order No. 7 to Contract 00-07 (Trunk Highway 13
- Divided Four-Lane Upgrade) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related
documents. •
CC. Contract Ol-O1. It was recommended.'i;stg~fb6#;ayment for Contract0l-O1 (Letenddre Addition,
Canterbury Forest and Wedgewoodition - Stree~•}tovements) in the amount of $24,947.70 to
Northwest Asphalt and accept the itp48vements for perpelis City maintenance subject to warranty
provisions. ..s .;.s
u
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
September 17, 2001
Page 3
DD. Contract 01-02. It was recommended to approve the final payment for Contract 01-02 (Eagandale Center
Industrial Park - Street Overlay) in the amount of $78,718.34 to McNamara Contracting, Inc., and accept the
improvement for perpetual City maintenance subject to wa ranty provisions.
EE. Contract - Dispatch Services. It was recommended to approve the 2001 annual contract renewal for the City
of Eagan providing dispatch services to the City of Rosemount Police and Fire Departments. !
Items pulled from the Consent Agenda:
H. Final Subdivision - Manley Addition. :;:;::;ti;:;:; yr; .
City Administrator Hedges introducr,~# t#tS,S tXe subdivision for Manley Addition to create
30 lots on 13 acres located south of Cliff Ro. west of Roai A previous condition placed on the
approval of the Preliminary Subdivision rega the upgrade of Dodd Road was discussed.
Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Final Subdivision (Manley
Addition) to create 30 lots on 13 acres located south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road in the iiorthwest of
Section 36. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
I. Aerial Platform Fire Truck.
City Administrator Hedges discuss 41is item f.rding the purchase of an aerial platform fire truck. He
discussed methods of financing for thepr,'QSosed pine of the truck. '
Councilmember Carlson moved , Cquucilpiep313s Tilley seconded a motion to approve the bid presented
by Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. in the amounfi 1 platform fire truck with the method of
payment being out of general fund balance. • Aye''' S''''Ta%~f}'~ • • • • • • • .
K. Project 799. Mayor Awada stated she would be abstaining from consideration of the Final Assessment Roll for
Project 799 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Street Overlay) and the scheduling of a public hearing to be
held on October 16, 2001 due to a conflict of interest as a potentially assessed property. Councilmember
Bakken took over as Acting Mayor for the discussion of this it=.-..
Acting Mayor Bakken moved, CounciknRi}o:ed a motion to receive the Final Assessment Roll
for Project 799 (Eagandale Center.Industri~tj I? L~e:~•$ifeet Ov> ay) and schedule a public hearing to be held on
October 16, 2001. Aye: 4 Nay 0 Abstain: ,1, • i
L. Project 850. City Administrator Hedges discusse~•tis~ioKyding Project 850 Dodd Road, (Diffley Road to
Ethan Drive) Street and Trail Improvements. He stated t 2A;;kti:Aponse to the Council's directive of
September 4, a feasibility report has been prepared and is now Nihig presented to the Council for their
consideration of scheduling a public hearing for October 16, 2001. ,
A petition was distributed to the Council from residents in the Bradford Ct, Bradford Circle and Welland j
Ct neighborhoods requesting the extension of the proposed improvements north to Elrene Rd/Coventry Dr. Several
residents spoke both in favor and against th~X Vopos~.~ gnd trail improvements. Discussion occurred
regarding the schedule and location of a g:Abi};-:;project, the historical perspective of Dodd
Road, and other petitions received. Mayof jvada staf hi= felt these issues should bt discussed at the public
hearing. She went on to explain that magy Fgsidents in t area had requested the upgrade, which is the reason for i
the project being brought forward for a hearin
Mayor Awada moved, Councilri;bY:F!}g,:motion to receive the feasibility report for
Project 850 and schedule a public hearing to be held on October ~6'. 2001. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
PUBLIC HEARINGS
VARIANCE .R CINDY HOLMSTEN
City Administrator Hedges intrthis item reg a variance request of 12 feet into the required 30 '
foot building setback from public right-d'y for Lot 45, Bloo11~:;~ Hills of Stonebridge, located at 743 Cheshire
Court: Senior Planner Ridley gave a stW~eport.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
September 17, 2001
Page 4
Mayor Awada opened the public hearing.
There being no public comment, Mayor Awada closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the
Council.
• Councilmdmber Carlson moved, Cot; `member Fields seconded a motion to approve a variance of 12
foot into the required 30 foot building setback fioin public right-of-way for Lot 45, Block 7, Hills of Stonebridge,
located at 743 Cheshire Court in the SW of,,9tot0
VARIANC ,...S)~kCTf bWfbf0'LMPMENT
City Administrator Hedges introduc$this item regarding a variance to allow 9 foot parking stall widths on
Lots 1'2, and 3, Block 1, Spectrum Business Park, located on Blue Gentian Road. Senior Planner Ridley gave a
staff report.
Mayor Awada opened the public hearing.
There being no public comment, lvfr AwadQsed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the
Council. '
Councilmember Tilley moved, Coupeil~l~rt~hCr Melds seconded a motion to approve a variance to allow 9
foot parking stall widths on Lots 1, 2, and 3i;y f .;etik~,''$s Park, located on Blue Gentian Road
between Trunk Highway 55 and Blue Water RbeB'iri•tl~t'~Y'6 on 2. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND -UTILITY EASEMENT
LEXINGTON POINTE 14"H ADDITION, LOT 13, BLOCK 1
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regardingt)W;vacation of a public drainage and utility
easement on Lot 13, Block 1, Lexington Pointe 14'h A#pod-:::pk rtfC-*orks Director Colbert gave a staff report.
eie beit'no public comment, she closed the public hearing
Mayor Awada opened the public b"
and turned discussion back to the Council.
Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmen 6et;3:W4*.- sPConded a motion to approve the vacation of a
public drainage and utility easement in Lexington Pointe 14"'`f►dclittKs, Lot 13, Block 1) and authorize the Mayor ad
Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay:
PROJECT 748 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING - JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD
(STREETS AND UTILITIES)
This item was noted to be continuqtt q:t' ti&pr 2jW.k.,.q* a agenda.
VACATION OF Rjh$IC DRAWGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
(EAGANDALNTER,IUSTRIAL PARK NOS. 3 & 4)
• This item was noted to be contui agenda.
. ~ ~ of v.
•'J1i.
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
September 17, 2001
Page 5
OLD BUSINESS
AMENDMENT TO AWARD OF CONTRACT 01-14
(STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS)
City Administrator Hedges introducq4;Abis item regarding an amendment to the Award of Contract 01-14.
Public Works Director Colbert gave a brief stj aport. Mayor Awada inquired about the status of any remaining
projects proposed under this contract.
} :per.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Cott }cs t it i; ~~o~ded a motion to •approve an amendment to
award of Contract 01-14 (Storm Mitigation I; ro'vemerifs'='lt%1t'sc # 1, 4, 5, & 10) and authorize the Mayor
and Deputy City Clerk to execute all relatedpiments. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
AMENDMENT TO AWARD OF CONTRACT 01-15
(STORM MITIGATION EVIPROVEMENTS)
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding an amendment to the Award of Contract 01-15.
Public Works Director Colbert gave a brief $ report. Mayor Awada inquired about the status of any remaining
projects proposed under this contract.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Cpicihnembi:Wields seconded a motion to approve an amendment to
award of Contract 01-15 (Storm Mitigarion,>lnprpvemeW Misc. Areas # 6, 7 & 8) and authorize the Mayor and
Deputy City Clerk to execute all related doc{r~tiet''+'.t;~rz
NEW BUSINESS
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 10, SECTION 10.31
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding o;amendment to Chapter 10, Section 10.31
regarding noise. Police Chief Therkelsen stated the ameRdT}t:Citended to facilitate easier enforcement of
noise violations resulting from electronic soun.Qc;ray$j'
Councilmember Fields moved, C'Ounciknember Tile seconded a motion to approve an ordinance
amending Chapter 10, Section 10.31 regard-i%*` ons. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
CONSIDER PROFESSION AL'~'fiR GOLF COURSE
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the possibility of conducting a community poll
on the development of a golf course.
Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to direct staff to conduct a
professional/scientific community poll regaK.p$ A%lopmept9f.4. If course.
Council and City Administrator: e3ges dis O • j ~&e proposed poll and the role of the Golf Course
Exploratory Committee. Administrator Mi ges statedWR it is imperative to keep the process of the poll and the
process of the Exploratory Committee e* c with ether. Information will be brought back to the next
• Council meeting regarding costs and the i pt.quaS gikto J2 ipcluded in the poll. The suggestions of the
Exploratory Committee will be shared w3ds,S3;,fC,dSr, uncilmember Carlson stated she felt the poll
was an excellent idea but input needs to come from the Ezp~'oi'dfi3ry Committee, as well as from other public groups.
She stated that the Council should try to stay out of the process as much as possible and allow the Committee to
have the vast amount of input.
Mayor Awada moved, CouncilmembeT;E,-' si rpnded a friendly amendment to Councilmember Tilley's
motion to read as follows: Direct staff to. }tc}~S~ ' ' ' °O'da /scientific community poll regarding
development of a golf course, with input;.. W."the Golf Cot qq ploratory Committee and the PEPPC Group in'
relation to questions to be asked in the pd#i~ r review by CouriWt the October 2, 2001 Aye: 5 Nay: 0
I
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
September 17, 2001
Page 6
COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AM0Wft311ENT, REZONING AND PRELEANARY SUBDIVISION -
• SER CORPORATION
City Administrator Hedges introduceA.:y9n, • a; rehensive Guide Plan Amendment from
Retail Commercial to Medium Density Resido&~l~i~~¢~yt(g ::unary Planned Development and
Preliminary Subdivision (Cedar Villas). He sjatt,d that severs? b=Yhafl'h~essages had been received regarding this
issue and were forwarded to Council. Seniot#~binner Ridley gave a staff report.
Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation, made a presentation regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment,
overall development goals and property management.
Mark Ulfers, Dakota County CDA discussed the project, stating that should the project be approved by
Council, it would not be completed until their 2004. He discussed the cost of each unit and the affordable
housing status in Eagan.
Patty Hurd, representative for M1C agan and * " kesperson for the group asked that members of the
audience that are in favor of the proposed prc*p. t,iq,St4n~;:'Ihe majority of the audience stood. Ms. Hurd went on
to discuss the need for increased affordable ,33sagsi;;• • • •
Approximately 12 residents spoke in favor of the proposed project.
Council discussed items including siding of the buildings, garages, private streets, monitoring of parking,
unlicensed vehicles, etc., and density.
Councilmember Carlson and Mayor Awada stated t t-'1R p:4lortion of the proposed units should be
available for sale. They stated there is a need,fgr..c ;i 'A Ex. abfe•reatal housing, but affordable ownership as
well. They also stated they felt the three be'iligVC 4f~s'sfioulrfave two car garages rather than one.
Councilmembers Tilley and Fields sitifei#;sb Btee•}p favor of the concept and would like to work with
Shelter Corporation and the CDA.
Councilmember Bakken expressed concern over lack of trglways on Nicols Road. He also discussed the .
fiscal aspects of the project and the possibility of commercial property being located on part of the parcel. He stated
that more time is needed to work out the issues.
Mr. Jensen stated he is willing to consider the ownership issue but stated he did not feel that commercial
would work on the site. He stated he was :bb:waive dio-U:,day Agency Action Requirement.
.
• Mayor Awada moved, Councilr~i~er Bakl js:; Bonded a motion to continue consideration of a
Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment om RC (Rend ommercial) to MD (Medium Density Residential) and a
Rezoning / Preliminary Planned Developi." and Pr ary Subdivision for Shelter Corporation to the October
2, 2001 meeting and direct Councihnemlii GzdsoR;t : tp Work with the applicant. Aye: 5 -Nay 0
VISITORS T(f'W'JE#1~ARD
Doris Dahlene, 3830 Alder Lane, read a letter she submitted to the Council in December, 2000 regarding
her home not being included in a proposed TIF district. Mayor Awada stated she would like to discuss with Ms.
Dahline the possibility of her house being movet}*cF t.
ADJOUR 4".T '
The meeting adjourned at 10:V*M- ti
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
September 17, 2001
Page 7
Date Deputy City Clerk
If you need these minutes in an alternative foj%j:j~ch as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City
of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, but 2, (651) 681-4600, (TDD phone: (651) 454-8535).
The City of Eagan is committed to the policy-;;q.Yxaccess to its programs, services, activities,
facilities and employment without regard to tional origin, sex, disability, age, sexual
orientation, marital status or status with regard:tq public assistance.
f
.;.L
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. PERSONNEL ITEMS
Item 1. GIS Intern--
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the hiring of Greg Schauer as a GIS Intern.
Item 2. Cascade Bay/Civic Arena Maintenance Worker--
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the hiring of Kevin Kinney as a Cascade Bay/Civic Arena maintenance worker.
Item 3. Resignation/Clerical Technician III/Community Development--
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To accept the resignation of Holly McGraw, Clerical Technician III in Community Development.
u
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001, Eagan City Council
CONSENT AGENDA:
C. TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE
FAITHFUL SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a Temporary Liquor License for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School for a
Silent Auction Event to be held on January 26, 2002 and waive fees.
FACTS:
• Kathelina Draves, Food and Entertainment Chairperson of Faith Shepherd
Catholic School, has requested a temporary liquor license for a silent auction
event to be held at Faithful Shepherd Catholic School on January 26, 2002.
• All proceeds from the event will go to the support of the school.
• They are also requesting the application fee of $150 be waived.
• Staff has reviewed the application and deem it in order.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Application and letter is attached without page number.
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
D. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CERTIFICATION OF
DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To schedule the public hearing for certification of delinquent utility bills for November 8, 2001.
FACTS:
• Twice a year, in April and October, the City initiates certification of utility bills delinquent
more than 30 days past due to the owners' property taxes.
• There are 383 utility accounts totaling $55,820.44 to be certified to the property taxes.
u
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
E. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT
FALSE ALARM BILLINGS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To schedule the public hearing for certification of delinquent false alarm billings for November 8,
2001.
FACTS:
• Twice a year, in April and October, the City initiates certification of delinquent false alarm
bills to the owners' property taxes.
• There are 20 false alarm bills totaling $3,967.50 to be certified to the property taxes.
/3
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
F. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CERTIFICATION OF DELINOUENT
NOXIOUS WEED CUTTING BILLS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To schedule the public hearing for certification of delinquent noxious weed cutting billings for
November 8, 2001.
FACTS:
• Twice a year, in April and October, the City initiates certification of delinquent noxious
weed cutting bills to the owners' property taxes.
• There is one weed cutting bill totaling $155.00 to be certified to the property taxes.
/Y i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
G. APPROVE 2002 FUNDING APPLICATION TO DAKOTA COUTY FOR THE
COMMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT FUNDS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the submission of the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan 2002 Funding Application for
$85,936 from Dakota County to operate a Recycling Program for the Cities of Burnsville and
Eagan.
FACTS:
• Dakota County has funds available annually to help constituent cities promote and
operate landfill abatement programs.
• The Cities of Burnsville and Eagan combined their recycling program as of March 2000.
• The Cities of Burnsville and Eagan have prepared one application for both cities that will
be submitted to Dakota County.
• The application for the 2002 Community Landfill Abatement Program follows Dakota
County's solid waste guidelines and recommendations.
i
Agenda Information Memo
September 28, 2001 Eagan City Council
H. DIRECT PREPARATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO
CHAPTER 11 TO PROVIDE FOR WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to Chapter 11 to provide for waste transfer
stations as a conditional use in the I-1 (Limited Industrial) zoning district.
FACTS:
• There has recently been interest expressed in the establishment of a waste transfer station
in Eagan. Such use is currently not regulated in the city ordinance.
• The City Council may initiate an amendment to the zoning ordinance by directing staff
and the City Attorney to prepare an amendment for public hearing.
• The amendment to be drafted would provide for waste transfer stations as a conditional
use in the I-1, Limited Industrial, zoning district.
ATTACHMENTS:
None
/6
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001, Eagan City Council
1. FINAL SUBDIVISION (FOUR PAWS ADDITION) - FOUR PAWS PET
RESORT
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a Final Subdivision (Four Paws Addition) to create one lot and one outlot on 5.54
acres located east and west of Hwy. 13 on Old Sibley Memorial Hwy. and adjacent to Burnsville
in the SW 1/4 of Section 19
FACTS:
• The Council approved the preliminary subdivision on June 19, 2001.
• All necessary documents are in order for execution at the regular meeting of the City Council
on October 2, 2001.
ATTACHMENTS:
Final Plat, page 4&
MI
W. FLAT i N o
as ~ ~ a ~ H
1011 rk l ` HWV pp, 11 w
SFUNK W ~
lit
3 $ Y y i iii in
I; YJ jai
0
v i:. •~,g,
all
sm X10,
CO!
Q O yrF ~0~+ b~
I Y
AV,
W `
s• £T 23~y
~ bid
I r M •J • \ a=~;.
100
s•• \
.itl_. M'Zt9 .9Z,ZOd9l ,n. r..
1T'I itYisU.IO •~f-IYM wV 1wI { tK{ ]L .14V1m Mia .ltIV4 ~]Lp,.
I
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
J. APPROVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT 2246 CLARK STREET
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the acquisition agreement for 2246 Clark Street.
FACTS:
• The single-family residential property at 2246 Clark Street was among the homes
identified by the City Council to be considered for acquisition and renovation as a
result of the July 7-8, 2000 super storm.
• The City has reached an agreement with the homeowner at 2246 Clark Street for the
purchase of their property.
• Final details of the purchase agreement are being worked out and a final signed copy
will be presented to the Council prior to the regular meeting.
• The funding of this acquisition project will be provided as part of the $5 million
disaster relief funding provided by the 2001 Minnesota Legislature.
l9
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
K. APPROVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT 4185 STRAWBERRY LANE
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the acquisition agreement for 4185 Strawberry Lane.
FACTS:
• The single-family residential property at 4185 Strawberry Lane was among the homes
identified by the City Council to be considered for acquisition and renovation as a
result of the July 7-8, 2000 super storm.
• The City has reached an agreement with the homeowner at 4185 Strawberry Lane for
the purchase of their property.
• Final details of the purchase agreement are being worked out and a final signed copy
will be presented to the Council prior to the regular meeting.
• The funding of this acquisition project will be provided as part of the $5 million
disaster relief funding provided by the 2001 Minnesota Legislature.
0o
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
L. PROJECT 771. LEXINGTON AVENUE
DIVIDED FOUR-LANE UPGRADE
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve an Easement Agreement for Project 771
(Lexington Avenue - Divided Four-Lane Upgrade) with the owner of Parcel 10-84500-010-01
(Studio 3345) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• The City of Eagan is the lead agency in partnership with the Dakota County Highway
Department in the upgrade of Lexington Avenue (CSAH 43) to a four-lane divided highway
between Lone Oak Road and Yankee Doodle Road and includes the installation of new
traffic control signals at the intersections of Northwood Parkway/Neil Armstrong Boulevard
and Clubview Drive.
• The upgrade of Lexington Avenue required the acquisition of numerous permanent and
temporary easements from the adjacent properties.
• Appraisals were obtained for all required easements. The appraisal of the easements for said
property indicated a value of $17,800. In order to settle and avoid additional costs in
attorney fees and commissioner's hearings, staff has suggested an offer of $20,000 as an
appropriate alternative. The property owner has consented to this offer.
• An agreement between the City of Eagan and the owner of Studio 3345 has been prepared
providing for the payment of the acquisition of all necessary easements.
• Engineering staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed this agreement and found it to
be in order for favorable Council action.
ISSUES:
• The property owner has requested an immediate resolution to the easement acquisition.
However, staff has not received the fully executed agreement at the writing of this report. If
the agreement is not received prior to the City Council meeting, staff will request removal of
said item from the October 2 agenda.
• If the City Council would desire to discuss this item, it would be appropriate to withhold
discussion until the Executive Session.
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
M. PROJECT 800, CEDAR GROVE ACCESS MODIFICATIONS
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the resolution requesting funding from the
Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement for Project 800
(Cedar Grove Access Modifications - Street Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and
Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• The reconfiguration of Silver Bell Road, from TH 13 to Beau D'Rue, as well as the
combining of the intersections of Cedarvale Boulevard with Beau D'Rue, a new traffic signal
at this new intersection and necessary utility improvements, as presented in the Village Plaza
study for the redevelopment of the Cedar Grove (Cedarvale) area, is programmed for 2002 in
the 5-Year CIP (2002-2006).
• On February 6, 2001, the City Council approved Project 800 and authorized the preparation
of final plans and specifications.
• The reconfiguration of the intersection of Silver Bell Road and Trunk Highway 13 would
include traffic and access management improvements providing benefit to the operation of
TH 13 and requested by MnDOT during the recently completed TH 13 improvements
(Contract 00-07).
• Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the
Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2003. If the funding
application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2002.
a~
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
N. PROJECT 859, TH 55/LEXINGTON AVEBLUE GENTIAN ROAD
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the resolution requesting funding from the
Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement for Project 859 (TH
55, Lexington Avenue, Blue Gentian Road - Intersection Reconfiguration) and authorize the
Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• The development of the area adjacent to Blue Gentian Road and Blue Water Road, including
the Grand Oak Business Park and Spectrum Commerce Center, required the preparation of an
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) in lieu of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) due to the projected impact on the adjacent transportation system. The Council
approved AUAR recommended transportation improvements on the TH 55/TH 149/1-494
corridors related to the development of this area over a 20-year period.
• The reconfiguration of the intersection of TH 55, Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) and
Blue Gentian Road, including traffic signal improvements, was recommended in the AUAR
as one of the first development related transportation improvements.
• The completion of the extension and realignment of Blue Gentian Road is needed for access
to the Spectrum Commerce Center that is currently under construction with a scheduled
completion date of November 15, 2001.
• On September 4, 2001, the City Council awarded Contract 01-06 (Blue Gentian Road -
Street and Utility Improvements) to Danner Inc.
• Blue Gentian Road is a Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) and is eligible for construction
funding through the gas tax program. As such, it had to receive MnDOT State Aid Division
approval before the Council awarded the contract.
• In order to get MnDOT approval, a compromise was reached as a result of a mutli-agency
meeting to address the connection of the new Blue Gentian Road to Highway 55. The
compromised agreement involved the AUAR recommended intersection reconfiguration.
• Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the
Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2003. If the funding
application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2002.
C.3
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
0. PROJECT 860, TH 55/BLUE WATER ROAD
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the resolution requesting funding from the
Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement for Project 860 (TH
55 and Blue Water Road - Intersection Reconfiguration) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy
City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• The development of the area adjacent to Blue Gentian Road and Blue Water Road, including
the Grand Oak Business Park and Spectrum Commerce Center, required the preparation of an
Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) in lieu of an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) due to the projected impact on the adjacent transportation system. The Council
approved AUAR recommended transportation improvements on the TH 55/TH 149/1-494
corridors related to the development of this area over a 20-year period.
• The reconfiguration of the intersection of TH 55 and Blue Water Road, including traffic
signal improvements, was recommended in the AUAR as one of the first development related
transportation improvements.
• On September 14, 1998, the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report
considering the installation of a new traffic control signal at the intersection of TH 55 and
Blue Water Road, along with access management improvements along TH 55 (Project
750R).
• On March 20, 2001, Project 750R was canceled due to Dart Transit's lack of support for the
revenue proposal in the feasibility report and their desire to pursue alternative solutions for
the access of their property to Trunk Highway 55.
• The completion of the Spectrum Commerce Center, currently under construction with a
scheduled completion date of November 15, 2001, includes 1750 parking stalls.
• A review of the current development of the area in relationship to the AUAR
recommendations indicates it would be appropriate to proceed with the Blue Water/TH 55
intersection reconfiguration.
• Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the
Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2003. If the funding
application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2002.
a~
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
P. CLIFF LAKE ROAD & KYLE WAY
TRAFFIC CONTROL STUDY
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a
traffic control study by the City Engineer for the intersection of Cliff Lake Road and Kyle Way/
CUB Food's driveway entrance.
FACTS:
• On September 17, 2001, at the City Council's Listening Session, Jack Puterbaugh, resident at
1931 Jan Echo Trail, submitted a petition from residents in the Cliff Lake Townhomes
neighborhood requesting a traffic control analysis of the intersection of Cliff Lake Road and
Kyle Way (a private street) and the Cliff Lake Center commercial driveway entrance
adjacent to Cub Foods. The residents' concerns are mainly regarding pedestrian safety across
Cliff Lake Road between the Cliff Lake Townhomes and Cliff Lake Centre.
• It would be appropriate for the City Council to formally authorize the City Engineer to
prepare a traffic control study to analyze necessary traffic control improvements, if any, and
define the scope, cost, schedule and method of financing for the improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Petition, pages through
• Location Map, page.
as
1931 Jan Echo Trail
Eagan, MN 55122
August 21, 2001
RECEIVED
Mayor Patricia Awada AUG 2 4 2001
Eagan Municipal Center
3830 Pilot Knob Road EAGAN
Eagan, MN 55122 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Dear Mayor Awada:
Please find attached a Petition that has been signed by the writer of this letter and several
of my neighbors who live in the Cliff Lake Townhouse project.
The names of other owners and residents could have been obtained, but since a prior
petition with some sixty names went unheeded, it seemed that further effort would have
been a waste of time. The failure of Eagan city government to acknowledge receipt of
communications represents a rather arrogant and cavalier attitude.
Anyway, since the Planning Commission and City Council failed to address pedestrian
safety at the intersection described in the Petition when the Cliff Lake Townhouse project
was approved, it is now time for you and the council to correct a failure of the past.
Or, are you waiting for someone to be killed at this intersection before interest of city
government is piqued? Enclosed is a clipping from the Pioneer Press of August 18`, that
describes what happens when city government does not act responsibly-a dead 15 year
old. As an aside, maybe you can also explain why the intersection of Deerwood and
Blackhawk Road is now controlled by the installation of through stop signs.
Do you think it is possible to get a review of the enclosed Petition, and to receive a report
back from the city? If you're short of stamps let me know and I'll furnish you with a
SASE.
Very Truly yours,
Jack Puterbaugh
(651) 452-6730
cc: Councilmember Paul Bakken; Councilmember Peggy Carlson; Councilmember
Cyndee Fields; Councilmember Meg Tilley; Amy Sherman, Pioneer Press
C~6
PETITION
TO THE MAYOR AND
MEMBERS OF THE
EAGAN CITY COUNCIL:
We the undersigned property owners and residents of the city
of Eagan hereby request and demand that appropriate steps be
initiated to ensure pedestrian safety at the intersection of Cliff
Lake Road at Kyle Way and the entrance to the Cub Foods
parking area. The failure of city officials, both elected and
appointed, to ensure pedestrian safety at this intersection,
either by the installation of four-way thru stop signs or a
traffic semaphore, is tantamount to dereliction of duty. It is
anticipated that this petition will result in appropriate
corrective action being taken.
NAME ADDRESS
11A THW Bra yyi~ FACMvti
y Al a
I-) J AAA EJ,n T(jA I
la-~o
44
Kzv
149 Gf *c.~.o ~
q $0 Toa
,I i~ty 3 Jan LVx07ra-1(
ty,
J
c;2Y
Q
9-28-01
SCALE 1" = 100'
may
4)
Y
Jan Echo Tr.
CLIFF EKE
Existing
Crosswalk
q
CUB FOODS
Parking
J
Cliff Lae Road & Kyle Way
Sept. 28, 01
City of Eagan Location Map
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
Q. CONTRACT 01-07. LEXINGTON AVENUE
DIVIDED FOUR-LANE UPGRADE
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract 01-07 (Lexington
Avenue - Divided Four-Lane Upgrade) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to
execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• Contract 01-07 provides for the upgrade of Lexington Avenue (CSAH 43) to a four-lane
divided highway between Lone Oak Road and Yankee Doodle Road and includes the
installation of new traffic control signals at the intersections of Northwood Parkway/Neil
Armstrong Boulevard and Clubview Drive.
• The revisions detailed in the change order address a change in the scope of work and
additional work adjacent to the US Postal Service property.
• Change Order No. 2 addresses the reinsertion of contract bid items impacting the USPS
property in to the construction work plan after City staff had directed the contractor to delete
said items from the work plan. The direction to originally delete the items was based on the
failure to acquire the necessary easements from the USPS.
• City staff originally contacted USPS representatives in September 2000. Several meetings,
teleconferences, written correspondences and telephone communications occurred between
September 2000 and September 2001. The USPS finally agreed to allow the contractor
access to USPS property on September 14, 2001. The City was not able to acquire the
needed USPS earlier through the Eminent Domain process.
• The work items needed to be completed to provide a finished appearance to the project.
Driveway work, fence relocation, storm drainage and trail improvements were all included as
original bid items that were delayed due to the lack of cooperation from the USPS. In order
to complete these items, the contractor and his subcontractors had to remobilize.
• Change Order No. 2 includes the repetitive stockpiling and eventual removal of earthen
material planned to be placed on the USPS Bulk Mail Center property. The filling and
grading of material excavated from the public right-of-way onto the Bulk Mail Center site
was included in the Council approved final plans.
• The cost of the additional work is consistent with bid prices for relevant bid items on other
projects within the city.
• This change order has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order
for favorable Council action.
• The change order provides for an additional cost of $41,220.00 (0.99% of original contract).
The associated costs will be the responsibility of the Dakota County Highway Department
(55%) and the City's Major Street Fund (45%).
ATTACHMENTS:
• Change Order No. 2, pages,-3,Lthrough
30
CITY OF EAGAN
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACT 01-07 CHANGE ORDER 2
PROJECT 771 DATE: September 21, 2001
PROJECT NAME: Lexington Avenue (CSAH 43) Street Improvements
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
CONTRACTOR: McNamara Contracting ENGINEER: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
5001 160m Street West 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 200
Rosemount, MN 55068 Minnetonka. MN 55343
DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE ORDER WORK:
Section A - Change of project scope at the USPS facilities.
Section B - Additional work generated by Contractor
JUSTIFICATION FORIPURPOSE OF CHANGE ORDER:
Section A - On August 5, 2001, the Contractor was advised that certain contract items for improvements to the
USPS properties were being deleted from the contract due to the inability to obtain the associated easements and
the right of entry.
Negotiations still continued between Eagan Staff and USPS and, on September 14, 2001, an agreement was
finally reached and the right of entry was granted.
The Contractor was then directed to complete certain previously deleted items to the USPS properties so as to
obtain minimum requirements for the bituminous trail and parking lot entrance improvements. The Contractor
responded and agreed to complete the changes for the contract bid prices but also asked to be additionally
compensated for this work due to project timing, remobilizing equipment and manpower and incurring a
substantial financial loss from other related deleted contract items.
SEH, Inc. and Eagan Engineering Staff concur with the negotiated unit price for labor and equipment for this
additional compensation.
Section B - Due to the lack of easement at the USPS property, the Contractor was forced to stockpile soils in
front of the USPS property. In order to accommodate utility relocations and various other construction activities,
these stockpiles had to be moved several times. The Contractor worked around the USPS property as much as
possible until he reached a point of immobility. The Contractor kept close records of the amounts of re-grading
that he performed. SEH, Inc and Eagan Engineering Staff also kept track of this additional work and concur with
the dollar amount and the negotiated unit price that the Contractor is requesting for additional compensation.
QCHANGE ORDERS/2001101-07 02 Lexington Avenue
31
DESCRIPTION OF WORK ITEMS:
Section A
Contract
Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Quantity Amount
Labor and Equipment HR 42.5 $400.00 42.5 $17,000.00
Total Section A $17,000.00
Section B
Contract
Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Quantity Amount
2105.501 Common Excavation CY 3,460' $7.00 3,460 $24,220.00
Total Section B $24,220.00
Total Section A $17,000.00
Total Section B $24,220.00
Total Change Order No. 1 $41,220.00
CONTRACT STATUS
TIME/COMPLETION DATE AMOUNT
Original Contract: August 15, 2002 $4,175,117.24
Change Order: No Change/August 15, 2002 $41,220.00
Subtotal of Previous Change Orders: $9,429.49
This Change Order: $41,220.00
New Subtotal of All Change Orders: $50,649.49
Revise Contract: 4,225,766.73
Percent Increase or Decrease for this Change Order to
Original Contract Amount: .99%
Percent Increase or Decrease for Total of All Change Orders
to Original Contract Amount: 1.21%
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
By: Q1 By: t
Project Manager tractor
By: Date:
City Department Manager
City of Eagan Council Action:
Mayor:
Clerk:
Date:
DISTRIBUTION
1 -City
2 - Contractor
I -Engineer
'Additional grading due to lack of easement at USPS property.
NAEAGAN\0001 \Const\CO 2.&c
2
3a
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
R. PROJECT 861, 2002 CITYWIDE TRAILS IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report by the City
Engineer for Project 861 (2002 Citywide Trail Improvements).
FACTS:
• On June 5, 2001, the City Council approved the Public Works Department's 5-Year Capital
Improvement Program (2002-2006) for the City of Eagan. This included approximately 8.1
miles of various sidewalk and trail impreovments broken out as follows:
• The trail improvements identified in the CIP to be installed as part of a greater roadway
improvement include the following locations:
Beau De Rue (Nicols Rd. - Silver Bell Rd.) - Proj. 759R South Side (3870 FT)
Town Centre Drive (Duckwood - Denmark) - Proj. 851 West Side (2600 FT)
Dodd Road (Diffley - Ethan/ Camberwell) - Proj. 850 Both Sides (1050 FT)
• The new trail segment improvements identified in the CIP to be installed under a separate
project include the following locations:
Thomas Lake Road (Thomas Center Dr. - Diffley) West Side (4600 FT)
• The existing trail improvements identified in the CIP for a maintenance overlay include the
following locations:
Northview Park Road (Lexington - Braddock) South Side (4230 FT)
Braddock Trail (Diffley - Northview Park Rd) West Side (2850 FT)
Coachman Road (Yankee Doodle - Four Oaks Rd) Both Sides (6890 FT)
Four Oaks Road (TH 13 - Coachman Rd) South Side (1380 FT)
Lone Oak Road (Egan - Lexington Ave) North Side (4000 FT)
Wescott Road (Lexington - Saddle Wood Dr) South Side (6670 FT)
Wescott Road (Pilot Knob - Westbury Dr) South Side (4670 FT)
• Based on this CIP schedule, it would be appropriate for the City Council to authorize the
preparation of a Feasibility Report by the engineering staff to further refine the scope, cost,
schedule and method of financing these proposed improvements.
33
Agenda Information Memo
September 17, 2001
S. CONTRACT 01-14, JULY 2000 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 01-14 (July 2000
Storm Mitigation Improvements - Misc. Areas # 1, 4, 5 & 10) and authorize the Mayor and
Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• Contract 01-14 provides storm water drainage system mitigation improvements in areas
affected by the July 2000 Super Storm, including Areas # 1, 4, 5 and 10 outlined and
discussed in the Preliminary Design Report (April 2001).
• On April 26, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the
consideration of storm mitigation improvements for the Beaver Dam Road and Bear Path
Trail area (Project 839).
• On June 19, the City Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications,
as well as the acquisition of any necessary easements, for the construction of storm
mitigation improvements for Project 839.
• On September 4, the City Council awarded Contract 01-14 to Lametti & Sons, Inc. in the
amount of $606,127.00.
• On September 17, Contract 01-14 was amended to provide for additional work at the cost of
$196,245.00, increasing the contract amount to $802,372.00.
• Change Order No. 1 adds storm sewer and grading improvements into the contract that were
outlined and discussed for the Beaver Dam Road and Bear Path Trail intersection (Project
No. 839) in the feasibility report (June 2001).
• The cost of the additional work is consistent with bid prices for relevant bid items on other
storm mitigation projects within the city.
• This change order has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order
for favorable Council action.
• The change order provides for an additional cost of $194,910.00 (24.3% of amended
contract). The associated cost will be the responsibility of the City's Storm Sewer Trunk
Fund.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Change Order No. 1, paged:57through3V-
`.3
BONESTROO AND ASSOC 6516361311 09/19/01 09:56 [5 :04/06 N0: 489
V.Fji tki/ 4 FJki: 3~ tHt~Mt t NV -UM L&V 3 bNHH N0.365
i
Botlestroo Bidder: Total Sam I1li co
ff 1qA'5!29tk% P~
Rotene
Andedkb Address: Telephone No. 1- --1 p
Amdates
lv~n ws t ArWons Ci . State Zi : Fat No
BND FORM
JULY 2000 STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
CITY CONTILACT NO.01.99
PROJECT NO. 839
F1L.E N0, 49400-109
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
2001
Opening Time:
Opening Date: 42;a-alpd T,_ ~•3 cn.
Honorable City Council - - -
Ciry of Sagan
3830 Pilot Knob Rd list-it• Grand fax transmittal memo 7871 ~ottsestes
Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1810 7047- W-p m v,:~ f~%%~^Rs
Dear Council Members- WW. Pitons G S~ 3
The and reigned, being familiar with your local eonditior
necessary, having studied the drawings and specifications for the work including Addenda Nos.
and being familiar with all factors and other conditi one affecting the work and cost thereof, hereby proposes to furnish
all labor, tools, materials, skills, equipment, and all else necessary to completely conatruot the project in accardanca
with the drawings and specifications on Pile with you and Softstroo, Rosene, Anderiik & Associates, Inc., 2333 West
Mighway 36, St Paul, Minnesota 55113, as follows:
Na Item Units Qty UN)t Prive Total Pries
Part 1- Beaver Dam Road I Pond Al -22
t Mobilization LS I S S "S. op pr n
2 Tn!'0c control LS 1 $ 10a t..~ $ 1 ,g=
3 Clearing and grubbing LS 1 S _ 4glz ► S7 ~Z=3~
4 Transplant Trot EA 5 S
. s~
5 Remove concrete curb and gutter LF 650 S Z L. nn
6 Remove conente driveway pavement SY 25 $ S
e94n DIN X4-hQd At-U-05 H•1
I F
BONESTR00 AND ASSOC 6516361311 09/19/01 09:56 [5 :05/06 NO:489
W1V1k$/dVW4 Idd:JJ tf•UHN 1J1_-V bWH NU.,•Sb5 LA
e
No. Item Uotb Qty Unit Price Total Price
1 Remove bituminous paversm SY 11000 S ~ S CM- 0
a Rewave biwnu noun driveway SY 30 3 1cl &4* &a
9 Renwve bituminous path SY 30 S t0 . ~ S 3fl .
10 36" storm lower, 01-8' deep LF 35 S -1 C'aa S -2. S, LC:-
11 36" harm sewer, 8'-1a deep LF is t "1 S : e5 C% S i ,1'L_. t
12 36" atom sewer, 10'-12' deep L,F 73 3 1 S S 4. M
RCP flared and section, incl trash EA 2 4n
13 3d
S Z :25'd_Q-3 S S~l~-no
14 Clear IA random riprap CY 30 S
Is Pond excavation (6V) - Area A CY 5,200 S Cum_ S 1, fig On. [~0
16 Pond excavation (M - Arta B CY 3,800 S Q, Sa S ~3 D-CA00
17 pond excavation (EV) - Area C CY 1.000 S CA S S ton
IS Common excavation (EV) CY SSO 3 %0 -Ol~ S
19 Subgrade preparation SY 160 S z oo S S00- C=1
20 Aggregate b se, Clans 5,100% crwhod TN 465 S \ Qr. Q~ S 62, n lM
a 80.00
21 9alvsgvd agg+egate (CV) CY 140 S oio S jj
22 Aggregate bale, ClM 5,100% erusbad - TK 1S S -t U_ Cy s
trail
23 9iMnlirow base course. Type 3113 TN 14S S S 01
24 Bituminous wear come, Type 41 A TN 110 S S ko a = Yti
25 2" Type 41A, bit.ddveway pavement SY 50 S r S '"11,1.
26 BinzMrlotw wear eoune, Type 41 A.
Pathway '1'id 3 S S
27 Simmimn material for tack coat CIAL 60 S ~..0n s - 2 got C3JJ
28 B61 B concrete curb and gutter 1-F 600 5 1-10, S \1i 0 C30 MS.
29 B612 concrete curb and gutter LF 60 S I-ob- C~ 1 1"20"3-
30
6" concrete driveway pavement SY 25 S t7.-> S t, d`~. t'1D
BONESTR00 AND ASSOC 6516361311 09/19/01 09:56 5 :06/06 NO:489
09/184&W4 IOd:.-b tHla(~V tfW UM VhV 4 bNHH rU„J%pJ Wr
'r
No. Item Units Qty Unit Prke Total Price
31 Adjust catch basin casting EA 2 S = $ -
32 Sawing Bituminous Pavement LF 170 S _'C\r~'_ S
33 unproved pipe foundation LF 120 $ - e S (vSzk I C% V%
34 Swett Sweeper with pick up broom with
operator HR 3 S S~
35 Water for dust control 1000 GAL 10 $ "&'U Qsz~~ S 7rozi . citz.
36 Structure marker sigh F-A 2 S 31==- 8 --M, t,._,_
37 SeedinS, w/ MnDOT seed prix 25A mod. AC 01 $3-7-
(25B) - Pmlrk Sed=c Meadow
38 Seeding, w/ MnDOT seed mix 38A mod. AC 0.6 Ste. ~a~b _ S OHO . ae~
(35B) - Dry Mixed Height Prairie
8,
\'Z ~1(vD0 r
39 Sodding. type lawn SY 4,650 $ 4c-. S
40 Topsoil borrow (LV) CY 680 $ S
Total Put 1- Savannah Road (Project No. 822) S
sr~
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
T. PROJECT 840, ROBIN LANE
STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 840 (Robin
Lane - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November
8, 2001.
FACTS:
• On April 26, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report
considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond AP-27, located to
the east of Robin Lane.
• This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 7 and 8,
2000 Super Storm.
• A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into both home
modification and pond outlet capacity modifications, and is being presented to the City
Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally
present and discuss the merits of this project.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report
details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further
review and discuss the proposed improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
39
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
U. PROJECT 843, BEECHER DRIVE
STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 843 (Beecher
Drive - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November
8, 2001.
FACTS:
• On April 27, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report
considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond AP-40, located to
the north of Beecher Drive.
• This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 2000
Super Storm.
• A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into an
emergency overland discharge route, as well as grading improvements, and is being
presented to the City Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public
hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this project.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report
details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further
review and discuss the proposed improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
3~
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
V. PROJECT 844, FORSSA WAY
STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 844 (Forssa
Way - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November
8, 2001.
FACTS:
• On April 27, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report
considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond AP-47, located in
Ridge Cliff Park, adjacent to Forssa Way.
• This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 7 and 8,
2000 Super Storm.
• A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into the addition
of storm sewer improvements, and is being presented to the City Council for their
information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss
the merits of this project.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report
details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further
review and discuss the proposed improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Feasibility Report, will be included with Administrative Agenda.
D
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
W. PROJECT 845. ROCKY LANEIPADDOCK COURT
STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 845 (Rocky
Lane/Paddock Court - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held
on November 8, 2001.
FACTS:
• On April 30, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report
considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond BP-29.7, located
north of Deerwood Drive in the Sherwood Downs development.
• This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 2000
Super Storm.
• A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into the
enlargement of the outlets from Pond BP-29.7 and modification of private property, and is
being presented to the City Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a
public hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this project.
• An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report
details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further
review and discuss the proposed improvements.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
X. PROJECT 510, LIFT STATION UPGRADES
STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve plans for Contract 01-09A (Lift Station Upgrades -
Storm Mitigation Improvements) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at
10:30 a.m. on Thursday, November 1, 2001.
FACTS:
• On April 3, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of detail plans and
specifications for storm mitigation improvements addressing the operation and management
of the City's drainage system.
• Contract 01-09A provides for the relocation of the electrical control panels at six storm sewer
lift stations within the City, as well as the raising of four access hatches (less than 4 feet) and
associated grading as presented in the attached feasibility report (Project 810). The
installation of new sluice gates for the Holland and Hurley lift stations would also be
included.
• The plans and specifications have been completed and are being presented to the City
Council for their approval and authorization of the advertisement for bids.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers.
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
Y. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH DECISION RESOURCES FOR GOLF
COURSE QUESTIONNAIRE & SURVEY
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the contract with Decision Resources for the golf course questionnaire &
survey.
FACTS:
• At the September 17, 2001 City Council meeting staff was directed to arrange for
a professional/scientific poll regarding the golf course, with input from the Golf
Course Exploratory Committee.
• Staff contacted Decision Resources, a highly regarded polling firm, and made
arrangements for them to provide a proposal to conduct a scientific survey
regarding the golf course issue including the directly tangential issues as they
understood them to be and as they felt necessary to achieve meaningful results.
• As part of the process to bring a proposed agreement and survey questions to the
City Council at this meeting, staff requested proposed questions from the
members of the Golf Course Exploratory Committee to be collected at their
meeting on September 26, 2001.
• At the Golf Course Exploratory Committee meeting the consensus of those in
attendance was that a poll at this time is premature. They wanted to thank the
City Council for the consideration and suggested that a poll now would not be
timely, recommended that a price for a poll be solicited with the actual polling to
be deferred to a later date. They further requested that the poll be
controlled/directed by the Exploratory Committee.
• Staff updated Decision Resources in a conference telephone call on Thursday,
September 27`h about the potential change to the original direction. Decision
Resources does not have a problem in deferring their involvement to a later date.
They were willing to share a range of cost estimates indicating that it is probably
not possible to do a poll with less than 10 questions due to the requirement for
demographic information, etc. A IO-question poll would cost in the range of
$4,000. Their original proposal called for 60 questions at a cost of $8,800. Dr.
Morris expressed some reservations about trying to address an issue with these
113
complexities and numerous interrelated issues with a 10-question survey. As
noted in the first proposal, each question beyond 60 would add $135 to the cost.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Enclosed on page q,5~ is a copy of the memo to Exploratory Committee
members asking for their participation in determining questions for the poll.
• Enclosed on pages_ through is a copy of the original proposal as
received from Decision Resources.
NOTE:
Given the request from the Golf Course Exploratory Committee, it may be
appropriate to pull this item from the Consent Agenda and consider action to
provide revised staff direction.
s,- MEMO
c _ city of eagan
TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001
SUBJECT: GOLF COURSE POLL
At the last regular City Council meeting held on Monday, September 17, direction was given by the
Council to contact Decision Resources requesting preparation of a proposal to conduct a
community poll on the golf course issue that is currently under study by this Committee. Decision
Resources is a highly regarded firm that specializes in polls/surveys for school districts and cities.
The purpose for conducting a poll at this time is to receive input from the public regarding a golf
course. The City Council feels this information would help the Exploratory Committee as you
continue your research, discussion and work on this issue. To assist Decision Resources and the
City Council in proceeding with the poll, it would be helpful if each member of the Committee
could submit proposed questions to be used to gain meaningful, quantifiable information from the
community. This information will further assist the Committee, and ultimately the City Council, in
the review of this issue.
This action by the City Council is intended to supplement the research and work on the golf course
study which the Exploratory Committee is facilitating on behalf of the City Council.
Proposed questions received from members of the Committee at the meeting on Wednesday,
September 26, will be shared with Decision Resources as they finalize their suggested questions
and proposal to the City Council for consideration at the October 2 meeting. Decision Resources
will use their professional expertise to finalize the questions and put them in the appropriate form to
conduct an unbiased and completely fair survey of a random sample of the community.
Your attention and assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated.
City Administrator
TLH/vmd
~ e
City of Eagan
Survey Research Proposal
September, 2001
DECISION RESOURCES, LTD.
3128 Dean Court
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
612-920-2401
612-920-1069 (fax)
wdm@inri.net
September 23, 2001
Mr. Kenneth Vraa
Park and Recreation Director
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1810
Dear Mr. Vraa:
Decision Resources, Ltd., is pleased to present this survey research proposal to you for the City
of Eagan. Much of this proposal is based upon your discussion with my partner, Diane Traxler.
This prospectus is organized in three parts: a discussion of the goals of the research; a potential
design and schedule; and, estimated project costs. As you will see, I am certain that DRL can
provide the City of Eagan with the information it seeks in both a cost-effective and timely
manner.
GOALS OF THE RESEARCH:
• The survey would assess the attitudes and opinions of residents of the City of Eagan on five
separate, but interrelated issues:
1. Evaluation of City Recreational Programs and Services: How informed are residents about
the current park and recreation facilities and programs provided by the City? How do they rate
them? What facilities and programs, if any, would they newly offer, expand, modify, or
terminate? Do they consider park and recreation facilities and services a good value for the
property taxes they pay?
1/6
City of Eagan
Survey Research Proposal
September, 2001
2. General Perceptions of the Quality of Life in the City of Eagan: What do they like most
about living in the City? What do they consider to be the most serious issues facing the City?
How are residents viewing demographic changes during the past few years? How do parks and
recreational facilities add to the quality of life? What facilities and programs are currently
utilized by large segments of the community? How do they view their tax investments in park
and recreational facilities?
3. Attitudes and Opinions about a Golf Course: What are residential preferences about the need
for a golf course? Would residents be inclined to use this type of facility? What types of
amenities should be included in the facility? Are there any types of amenities citizens would
oppose including? If tax costs are involved, how willing are residents to raise property taxes for
the construction of a new golf course?
4. Environmental versus Recreation Land Use: How do residents feel about the amount of open
space dedicated to passive recreational pursuits within the City of Eagan? Would they support or
oppose the conversion of a passive recreational area to a golf course? How do they view specific
sites within the City for that type of facility?
5. Information Processes: How do residents obtain information about city government and its
services? In particular, what sources are relied upon for information about parks and recreation
issues?
DESIGN AND SCHEDULE OF THE RESEARCH.
Decision Resources, Ltd., proposes to conduct a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected
households in the City of Eagan. A sample of 400 residents would provide results projectable to
the entire city adult population within :L 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. The sample is also of
sufficient size to permit the district to be divided into a maximum of four categories for more
detailed analysis, such as age, mobility, home ownership, location of residence, presence of
children, and other demographic characteristics.
To insure the integrity of the sample, DRL places the most exacting sampling standards in the
industry on our procedures. Before an alternate household is substituted for a designated target,
at least twenty tries are made to contact the initial households during a five-day period. The
telephone calls take place during various times on weekday evenings and during the weekend.
Our interviewers are also instructed to seek convenient appointments with interviewees, cutting
our non-contact rate to less than five percent on average. An unbiased selection process is also
used to identify the adult member of the household to be interviewed. To validate the completed
sample, the latest United States Census updated population characteristics are utilized as a
standard of comparison.
The questionnaire would be administered by DRL trained and supervised personnel. The
computer analysis will be obtained from our in-house C-MENTOR and SPSS statistical analysis
VP
1 i
City of Eagan
Survey Research Proposal
September, 2001
systems, insuring both access to the most current analysis programs and confidentiality of the
data set.
The City of Eagan will be presented with two bound copies of the final report highlighting all the
major findings of the study. DRL will also speak to any major differences from and similarities
with the past study of the community, when applicable, in addition to other "growth"
communities. A volume of all computer generated cross tabulations and other multivariate
statistical techniques will also be included.
Our typical timeline follows, but can be amended somewhat to meet the unique needs of the city:
1. Planning with City Council Members, City Staff, and/or relevant individuals to establish the
topics to be covered in the survey. Based on these topic concepts, DRL would word specific,
neutral questions. This activity can be completed by a meeting, telephone and/or fax, depending
on client wishes, within two weeks of the initiation of the contract.
2. Structuring of questions and final approval of the survey instrument. These activities to be
completed within three weeks of the initiation of the contract.
3. Final determination of the field dates for interviewing.
4. Pre-testing and, if needed, approval of resulting revisions. This activity to be completed by
the second day of fieldwork.
5. Completion of all fieldwork within a three-to-four week period.
6. Computer analysis and preparation of written report. All analytical tests and commentary will
be available within three weeks after completion of the fieldwork.
7. Delivery of the final written report to the City of Eagan and presentation at a formal or
workshop meeting of the results and implications. Afterwards, telephone consultation, as the
need arises, will be provided about the study's findings and implications.
PROJECT COSTS:
The cost of a survey is driven by two factors: sample size and questionnaire length. A study
whose parameters are a maximum of 60 question items administered to a 400 household random
sample of the City of Eagan would cost $8,800.00. Each additional question unit beyond the
initial allotment would be $135.00.
As company policy, DRL requires one-half of the cost prior to the commencement of fieldwork;
the remainder is due upon delivery of the final written report. Unless otherwise arranged, DRL
City of Eagan
Survey Research Proposal
September, 2001
invoices clients for the initial payment at the time of the initiation of the contract; the remainder
is due at the time of the receipt of the final written report.
If you require any further information from us, feel free to contact either Diane or me. We look
forward to the opportunity to work once again with the City of Eagan, but, in any case, wish you
well with this project.
Sincerely,
William D. Morris, Ph.D.
President
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
Z. APPROVE STATUS OF EAGAN CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (ECVB)
AS A SEPARATE 50103) AND APPROVE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND
BYLAWS
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve the status of the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau (ECVB) as a separate 501c(3)
corporation retroactive to October 1, 2001 and to approve the new Articles of Incorporation and
Bylaws.
FACTS:
• Earlier this year, the Eagan Chamber of Commerce and the ECVB indicated to the
City of Eagan that they wished to operate as separate entities. This proposal was
reviewed by the Chamber of Commerce, the ECVB and the City Council.
• The ECVB Board approved the formation of a new separate corporation on April 19,
2001.
• In order to have new Federal and State ID numbers, a UC number and 501 c(3) status,
the application must be approved by the City of Eagan retroactive to October 1, 2001.
• It would be appropriate to approve the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws at this
time. In regards to the personnel and accountability sections of the Bylaws, those
sections will be reviewed by the City Council at a later date.
ATTACHMENT: t
Attached on pages J / through SS'is a copy of the proposed Bylaws for the ECVB.
so
BYLA WS
Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau
Date:
Purpose: The Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau (ECVB) is organized as private, not-for-profit
corporation to promote Eagan as a preferred destination and to advance the economic impact of tourism
in the Eagan area by attracting visitors, conventions, meetings and events.
Section 1 - General Provisions
A) Introduction.
1. Whereas, the City of Eagan believes tourist activity and additional visitors to the City and the
surrounding area promotes desirable economic activity and enhances employment;
2. Whereas, the City of Eagan has ordained in City Code Section 2.80, the imposition of an
occupancy tax pursuant to Minnesota Statues Section 469.190 at the rate of 3% as of November 1, 1993;
3. Where as the City of Eagan desires that 95% of the taxes collected pursuant to this ordinance
fund a local convention/tourist bureau for the purpose of marketing and promoting the City as a
tourist/convention center (destination);
4. Whereas, the City of Eagan has designated the Eagan CVB (Convention & Visitors Bureau) as
the recipient of these funds;
5. Whereas the Council members of the City of Eagan have designated an initial Board of
Directors to form the Eagan CVB and establish its Bylaws;
6. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the
initial Board of Directors agree as follows:
SECTION H Office
A) Principal Office. The principal office of the Corporation shall be located within the City of Eagan.
SECTION III - Name
A) Name Variations. In addition to its corporate name, Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau as
registered with the Minnesota Secretary of State, the Bureau may do business under the trade
names: "Eagan Visitors Bureau," "Eagan Tourism Bureau," "Eagan CVB;" or other such names as
the Board of Directors may from time to time find appropriate and register properly.
II. Board of Directors
A) General Powers: The affairs of the ECVB and the control of its property and business shall be
managed by the ECVB Board of Directors consistent with the Articles of Incorporation and the
Bylaws. The Board is responsible for strategic planning, developing, & monitoring of the
Marketing Plan, budget, policy decisions and the annual audit. The Board will take a proactive
role in the promotion of the CVB.
B) Composition: The ECVB Board of Directors will consist of at least 13 members and not more than
25 members in good standing. The Board shall consist of at least six (6) members from the hotel
industry in the City of Eagan (all hotel general managers may elect to participate on the Board as
long as theirproperty is in compliance with the City tax code), two (2) appointed by the local
taxing authority (City of Eagan), one (1) from the Hospitality industry of the Eagan area, at least
one (1) major employer in the Eagan area, one (1) Community-at-large, one (1) NDC Chamber of
Commerce appointee and the ECVB Executive Director,
No employer shall have more than one (1) representative on the Board. Each Committee member
shall name one (1) alternate from the organization they represent to be approved by the Board.
This alternate will attend meetings and be allowed to vote in the absence of the Board member.
s~
C) Qualification: A member of the Board of Directors in good standing shall support the mission of
the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau and adhere to the City of Eagan Tax Code. Anv member
of the ECVB Board of Directors who shall be absent from three consecutive regular meetings of
the ECVB Board within a twelve month period shall be automatically dropped from the Board
unless such absence is approved by a majority vote of those voting at a regular meeting.
D) Term of Office: The regular tern of office of the ECVB Board of Directors shall commence on
January 1" of the year in which elected and shall run for a period of two (2) years thereafter unless
a member of the ECVB Board is elected to fill an un-expired term in which case said advisor shall
be elected for the duration of the term. When a member of the ECVB Board requests a sabbatical,
that position will be filled with a "like" member for the duration of the sabbatical. The position
will revert back to the member taking the sabbatical to complete their term. A member shall serve
no more than two consecutive two-year terms with the exception of the hotel industry Board
Members, NDC Chamber appointee and two City appointed members.
E) Meetings: Regular meetings of the ECVB Board of Directors shall be held bi-monthly (January,
March, May, July, September, and November) at such place and hour as the ECVB Board may by
resolution determine. The Annual Meeting will be held in January to begin the fiscal year.
F) Special Meetings: Special meetings of the ECVB Board may be called by or at the request of the
Chair or the Executive Director.
G) Notice: Notice of any special meeting of the ECVB Board shall be given at least two days
previously thereto by written notice delivered personally, sent by FAX, email, or sent by mail.
H) Vacancies: Any Director may resign at any time by giving notice to the Chair or ECVB Director.
Such resignation shall take effect at the date of-receipt of such notice or at any later time specified
in the resignation. All vacancies on the Board caused by death; resignation or removal may be
filled for the un-expired portion of the term by action of the Executive Committee.
I) Quorum: One third of the members shall constitute a quorum. In transacting business, a majority
vote of those attending is sufficient to adopt or carry any motion except those items requiring a
2/3rds vote in Robert's Rules of Order or this document.
SECTION III. Selection of Officers and Board Members:
A) Nomination of Officers: A Nominating Committee of three (3) people shall be named by the
Chairperson at the November meeting of the ECVB Board meeting. The ECVB Nominating
Committee will select a slate of officers from the ECVB Board to the Executive Committee for the
forthcoming year.
B) Election of Officers: At the January meeting the ECVB Board of Directors shall elect a
Chairperson (every other year), Vice Chairperson and 2"d Vice-Chairperson (yearly). One of the
three officers on the Executive Committee shall be a hotel representative.
C) Election of Board Members: The Nominating Committee shall also submit names of future
Board members in good standing for consideration by the Board as current terms expire.
D) Duties of Officers:
1) The Chairperson shall be the legislative head of the Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau,
shall serve'a two (2) year term and shall preside at all meetings of the ECVB Board of Directors.
With the approval of the ECVB Board, that person shall sign, with the Executive Director,
contracts and other instruments affecting the operation of the ECVB and its property. The Chair
shall, with the Executive Director, sign all formal documents of the ECVB, and in general, shall
2
S~
perform all duties incident to the office of the Chairperson or such other duties as may be from
time to time prescribed by the ECVB Board of Directors.
2) The Vice-Chair shall serve a one (1) year term as assistant to the Chair, performing the
duties of Chairperson in the Chairs absence. The Vice-Chair will automatically assume the Chair
position following the two-year term of the Chair.
3) The 2" Vice-Chairperson shall serve a one (1) year term and represents the third member of
the Executive Committee, performing those duties prescribed by the ECVB Board of Directors.
4) The Executive Director shall perform such responsibilities as may be assigned by the ECVB
Board of Directors. S/he shall serve as secretary to the ECVB Board and prepare notices and keep
minutes. S/he will also serve as secretary to all committees and/or task forces. With the assistance
of the ECVB Executive Committee, the Executive Director shall be responsible for the
preparation of an operating budget and marketing plan covering all activities of the ECVB, subject
to approval by the ECVB Board of Directors. The Executive Director shall be responsible for all
operating expenditures in accordance with the approved budget allocation.
5) Term and Starting Date: The term of office for all elected officers of the Convention and
Visitors Bureau shall be for the fast regular meeting in January until the following December, or
until their successors have been duly qualified and elected.
SECTION IV. Executive Committee:
A) Composition: The three members of the Executive Committee shall, by virtue of their
responsibility, include:
1. The Chair of the Board of Directors
2. Vice-Chair
3.2 n1 Vice-Chair
The Chairperson shall preside.
B) General Responsibility: The ECVB Executive Committee shall possess and exercise only
emergency powers of the ECVB Board It shall report its action or discussion at the next meeting
of the ECVB Board for its approval or rejection of the action taken.
C) Meetings: Notice of any meeting of the ECVB Executive Committee shall be given at least 24
hours previous thereto by written notice delivered personally or sent by mail to each member of
the ECVB Executive Committee at the address shown by records of the ECVB.
SECTION V. Committees and/or Task Forces: The ECVB Board of Directors shall appoint standing
committees and/or task forces as needed to carry out the annual program of work.
SECTION VI. Policy: The ECVB Board of Directors is responsible for establishing procedure and
formulating policy of the organization. It is also responsible for adopting all policies of the organization.
SECTION X. Bonding: At the Bureau's expense, the necessary Bonding and Liability Insurance shall be
purchased for the benefit of the Bureau, Directors and employees as their interest may appear.
SECTION XI. Indemnification: The Bureau shall have the power to indemnify any person to the full
extent permitted by law. To the full extent permitted by Minnesota Statues, as amended from time to time,
or by other provision of law, each person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any
threatened, pending or contemplated action, suit or proceeding, wherever brought, whether civil, criminal,
administration or investigative, by reason of the fact that s/he is or was a Director or Officer of the Bureau,
or s/he is or was serving at the specific request of the Board of Directors of the Bureau, as a director,
Officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprises,
shall be indemnified by the Bureau against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and
amounts paid in settlement actually or reasonably incurred by her or him in connection with such action,
suit or proceeding, provided, however, that the indemnification with respect to a person who is or was
serving as a Director, Officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise shall apply only the extent such person is not indemnified by such other corporation,
3
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. The indemnification provided in this section shall
continue as to a person or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of
such person and shall apply whether or not the claim against such person arises out of matters occurring
before the adoption of this Sub-Section.
SECTION )II. Limitation on Director Liability. To the full extent of the Minnesota Corporation law,
as it exists on the date hereof or may hereafter be amended, permits the limitation of elimination of the
liability of Directors, a Director of the Bureau shall not be liable to the Bureau for monetary damages for
breach of fiduciary duty as a Director. Any amendment to or repeal of this Sub-Section shall not adversely
affect any right or protection of a Director of the Bureau for or with respect to any acts or omissions of
such Director occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.
SECTION VII. Finances:
A) All money received shall be placed in an operating fund of the ECVB and shall be specifically
designated for the operation and activities of the ECVB. The ECVB Executive Director shall approve,
in advance, all budgeted expenditures paid for the benefit of the ECVB. The Executive Director of the
ECVB, with approval of the Chair of the ECVB Board may spend up to $1,000.00 of a non-budgeted
or non-allocated expense. No non-budgeted obligations or expenses over $1,000.00 shall be incurred
and no money appropriated without prior approval of the ECVB Board of Directors. Funding of the
ECVB shall primarily be from revenues raised by the City of Eagan Lodging Tax, memberships and
advertising sales. Those properties not complying with the City Tax Code shall have all privileges
accorded by the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau revoked including, but not limited to,
advertising, promotion, Board representation, co-op funds, leads and trade show participation. When
delinquent taxes are current, that property will be reinstated and may elect to reprint any materials
produced by the ECVB at their expense in order to add their property to the marketing.
The Bureau is a Nonprofit Corporation (Chapter 317A Minnesota Statutes) and the issuance of shares is
not required. The Bureau may not distribute profits or surpluses.
The annual budget must be approved by the ECVB Board of Directors and then presented to Eagan
City Council along with the annual report and the next year's program of work. The fiscal year shall
begin January and end December, 31.
B) Salaries and Compensation: ECVB Board members shall receive no salary or other compensation
for their services, but may, upon approval of the ECVB Board of Directors, be reimbursed for
reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the services performed for the ECVB Board.
C) Operating Reserve: A six-month operating reserve shall be set aside in an interest-bearing account.
The reserve shall accrue to approximately $90,000.00 to serve as the ECVB financial operating reserve.
SECTION VIII. Annual Report: The E_ CVB shall distribute an Annual Report during the 1st quarter of
each fiscal year.
SECTION IX. Amendments: These policies and procedures may be amended or altered by a two-thirds
vote of the ECVB Board of Directors. Notice for such a vote must be received by all ECVB Board
members at least ten days in advance of the meeting at which they are acted upon.
SECTION X. Parliamentary Procedure: the most recent edition of "Roberts Rules of Order" shall
govern the proceedings of the ECVB.
SECTION XI. Personnel: A personnel management committee consisting of the Chair, Vice-Chair and
2na Vice-Chair of the ECVB Board of Directors is responsible for the selection, hiring, performance review
and compensation of the ECVB Executive Director.
A) Executive Director: All employees of the ECVB shall report directly to the Executive Director.
S/He shall be responsible for employment, direction, supervision and compensation of all salaried
personnel of the ECVB.
4
Sf
SECTION XH. ECVB Membership: The ECVB shall recruit members in the hospitality industry who
will pay a yearly membership fee in order to utilize ECVB services. The services include, but are not
limited to, business listings in ECVB brochures, Internet listings, special rates for coupons, sales leads and
direct referrals by the ECVB.
Chair - Eagan CVB Board Executive Director- Eagan CVB City Administrator - City of Eagan
5
SS
i c
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
AA. PROCLAIM OCTOBER AS TOASTMASTERS MONTH
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To adopt a Proclamation proclaiming October, 2001 as Toastmasters Month.
FACTS:
• Toastmasters International is the world's leading organization devoted to
communication, public speaking and leadership skills.
• The ability to communicate clearly is a vital skill that can overcome barriers to
effective performance.
• There are more than 175,000 members in 63 countries, over 200 clubs with 4000+
members in Minnesota and 7 different clubs in the City of Eagan.
ATTACHMENTS:
Enclosed on page is a copy of the Toastmasters Month Proclamation.
CITY OF EAGAN
TOASTMASTERS MONTH PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, Toastmasters International is the world's leading organization devoted to
communication, public speaking and leadership skills; and
WHEREAS, the ability to communicate clearly is a vital skill that can overcome barriers to
effective performance; and
WHEREAS, there are more than 175,000 members in 63 countries, over 200 clubs with
4000+ members in Minnesota and 7 different clubs in the City of Eagan; and
WHEREAS, Toastmasters in Minnesota businesses, schools, communities and
organizations are dedicated to helping people from all walks of life improve their communication
and leadership skills,
NOW THEREFORE, I Patricia E. Awada, Mayor of the City of Eagan, on behalf of the
City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of October, 2001 as
TOASTMASTERS MONTH in Eagan, Minnesota.
In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand this 2°d day of October, the year of two thousand
and one.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
Its Mayor
Attest:
Its Clerk
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Those in Favor:
Those Against:
Dated:
CERTIFICATION
I, Maria Karels, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby
certify that the foregoing proclamation was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 2 day of October,
2000.
Maria Karels, City Clerk
S7
~ r
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
BB. APPROVE SUBGRANTEE AGREEMENT WITH DAKOTA
COUNTY CDA - CITY OF EAGAN
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
➢ To approve a Subgrantee Agreement with the Dakota County CDA for the
administration of CDBG funds designated by the City Council for Fiscal Year 2001.
FACTS:
➢ The Subgrantee Agreement stipulates the CDA's role in administering the CDBG
program funding on behalf of the City. The program funding distribution was defined
by the City Council early this year.
ISSUES:
None
ATTACHMENTS: None
S8'
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
CC. ADOPT RESOLUTION/ORDER TO INITIATE ALTERNATIVE
URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR BCBS EAST CAMPUS - CITY
OF EAGAN
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
➢ Adopt Resolution/Order to Initiate Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for
Blue Cross/Blue Shield East Campus.
FACTS:
➢ The BCBS East campus master development plan was preliminarily reviewed by the
City Council earlier this year. Direction was given for BCBS to proceed with the
necessary environmental reviews and then to return to the City Council for review
and action of the Preliminary Planned Development.
ATTACHMENTS: (1)
Resolution to order preparation of AUAR document, page 46athrough -.4KZ.
I
RESOLUTION NO.
CITY OF EAGAN
ORDER AUAR - BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD EAST CAMPUS
WHEREAS, there exists a site of approximately 157 acres in the west-central portion of
Eagan, bounded on the north by Yankee Doodle Road, on the west by Trunk Highway
(TH) 13, on the south by Blackhawk and Ashbury Roads, and on the east by the City's
public works facility, that is commonly referred to as the Blue Cross/Blue Shield East
Campus; and
WHEREAS, Blue Cross/Blue Shield is seeking Planned Development Approval for
expansion of its corporate office facilities, residential development, and associated
infrastructure improvements associated with the development of the East Campus; and
WHEREAS, it is prudent to conduct an environmental review of the proposed
development as provided for in the State of Minnesota Environmental Review Program
rules; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 provides for a substitute form of
environmental review known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)
process; and
WHEREAS, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process allows for the
environmental review of development and associated infrastructure in a particular
geographic area within a jurisdiction if the local government has an adopted
comprehensive plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has designated the East Campus property as "Special
Area" in its Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Eagan is the Responsible Governmental Unit ("RGU") pursuant
to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 Subp. 1;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan, that
• an AUAR be completed for the Blue Cross/Blue Shield East Campus.
CITY OF EAGAN
CITY COUNCIL
By:
It's Mayor
60
Attest:
It's Deputy Clerk
Motion by:
Seconded by:
Those in Favor:
Those Against:
Date: October 2, 2001
CERTIFICATION
I, Mira McGarvey, Deputy Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota in a regular meeting
thereof assembled this 2°d day of October, 2001.
Mira McGarvey, Deputy Clerk
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
DD. APPROVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEASE AGREEMENT
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the telecommunication lease agreement
withVerizon, Inc. for an antenna installation on the Southern Lakes Reservoir at 10656
Alton Court, IGH and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related
documents.
FACTS:
• The City has received an application from Verizon, Inc. for the installation of wireless
communications system antennas and ground support equipment on the Southern
Lakes Water Reservoir.
• This application has been reviewed by the City's radio communication consultant,
City Attorney's office and Public Works Department personnel and found to be
consistent with other past lease agreements and in order for favorable Council
consideration.
• The current Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Inver Grove Heights allows the
City of Eagan to lease space on this tower for telecommunications equipment.
V
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
PUBLIC HEARING
A. SUN CLIFF 1St ADDITION (LOT 13, BLOCK 1)
EASEMENT VACATION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and deny the vacation request of
a portion of a public drainage and utility easement on Lot 13, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1St Addition.
FACTS:
• On August 20, 2001, City staff received a letter from Raj and Kavita Khanchandani,
requesting the vacation of a portion of the existing drainage and utility easement on Lot 13,
Block 1, Sun Cliff 1St Addition (4277 Sunrise Road).
• The easement was originally dedicated to the City as part of the Sun Cliff 1St Addition for
drainage and utility purposes. The street-side easement is a standard plat dedication to
accommodate site drainage and possible future utility uses.
• The purpose of the request is to allow Mr. and Mrs. Khanchandani to construct a four-season
porch on an existing deck on Lot 13. The configuration of the proposed porch would
encroach further into the existing drainage and utility easement than the existing deck which
already encroaches by I foot.
• The existing deck appears to have been constructed without a building permit.
• The request would vacate a 3' wide portion of the existing easement needed to construct the
proposed four-season porch.
• All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected
private utility owners informing them of this public hearing. Dakota Electric Association has
objected to the request to date.
• Dakota Electric Association is not in support of approving this vacation due to the existing
use of the easement. An electrical line currently occupies the ten-foot wide drainage and
utility easement. The proposed addition would be within 2 feet of the existing electrical line.
• This vacation request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in
order for denial by the City Council. City engineering staff is not supportive of the
encroachment on the easement adjacent to a public right-of-way that is also in conflict with
an existing utility line.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map, page
• Proposed Easement Vacation, page
• Request Letter from Resident, page
• Dakota Electric Correspondence, page
,.3
1 1
' ~D a
Q
a
9-19-01
Q ~
or "to
s, I ~qp
O~ proposed Vacation o
O D C
DIFFLEY ROAD
fl aD
~ now orsur
g G
W
N Cr
1 Cr
U m
a U Y
Q o
J
444 a
s CUFF RD. a~ now (M nn a > nn .ow
g u ~ [
~ o Day
aQ~ o~ a o ~ A
U
- sooo ~
Proposed Ease Vacation Location Map
Sun Cliff 1st Addition 9-19-01
City of Eagan Lot 13, Block 1
NopkTH
s~\
#
3
i
AREA TO BE VAVCATED
J
Iro,
;
The Northeasterly 3.0 feet of the Southwesterly 10 feet and Northwesterly 23.0 feet of
the Southeasterly 62.17 feet of Lot 13, Block 1, Sim Cliff First Addition.
i s
RECEIVED
AU G 2 0 2001
To EAGAN
City of Eagan ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
I request the easement Vacation The North East 3.0 feet of the South West
10 feet and North West 23.0 feet of the South East 62.17 feet of lot 13,Block
1 Sun Cliff First addition.
We want to build 4 season porch on our existing deck . Though there is no
Gas or Electric lines running under this area The electric line is 2 feet away.
As for electric line diging concern 4 feet(2 feet on each side) is more than
enough for residential house. We will not damage any electric line .
Thanks
Sincerelv
Raj and Kavita Khanchandani
e4 6
LO d LL99 999 LS9 !upueyouey->j rea VUd bi, £ L00Z: LL 3sn6ny Aepijd
Russ Matthys
From: Knudsen, Craig [CKnudsen@dakotaelectric.com]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:33 PM
To: Russ Matthys (E-mail)
Subject: Sun Cliff 1st Addition-Proposed Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement
Russ:
I wanted to send over a quick response to the above-mentioned vacation.
I
understand that there is a Oct. 2, 2001 public hearing and I suspect
that
you will be writing the agenda item for this vacation before I have a
chance
to get our response back to you.
Dakota Electric Association is not in support of approving this vacation
due
to the existing use of the easement. This is a ten foot drainage and
utility
easement and we are currently using this easement in serving the public
with
underground electric energy. Any disruption to this line or access to
this
line could result in a loss to area residents.
Please feel free to contact me at (651) 463-6332 if you have any
questions.
Thanks,
Craig E. Knudsen
Land Use Manager
Dakota Electric Association
g
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. VARIANCE -RAJ KHANCHANDANI (4277 SUNRISE ROAD)
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
• To recommend approval of Variance to allow for a 7-foot setback from a public
right-of-way and a Variance to exceed the 20 percent maximum lot coverage
requirement by 1.4 percent in a residential district.
FACTS:
• A Variance of 9 feet from the 30-foot Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way setback was
granted to the subject property at the time the existing home was built in 1985.
• The subject lot is in a Planned Development and is approximately 9,370 square
feet in area. 12,000 square feet is standard for an R-1 single family district
• A 14-foot deck exists on the southeast side of the existing dwelling unit. The
applicant is proposing to remove the existing deck and replace it with a 14' x 24'
living space addition. The addition would project 14 feet into the previously
approved 21-foot setback allowance leaving a 7-foot setback from the Timber
Wolf Trail right-of-way.
• The proposed addition would also add 336 square feet of living space to the
existing building, creating a total building coverage of 21.4 percent.
• The applicant has stated that the lot size and comer configuration of the subject lot
is extremely confining and that converting the existing deck to living space should
not be any more obtrusive.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Staff report, pages through
6~
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 11, 2001 CASE: 29-VA-23-08-01
APPLICANT: Raj Khanchandani HEARING DATE: October 2, 2001
PROPERTY OWNER: Raj Khanchandani APPLICATION DATE: August 2, 2001
REQUEST: Additional 14' setback Variance to PREPARED BY: Erik Slettedahl
public right-of-way and to exceed 20%
lot coverage by 1.4%
LOCATION: 4277 Sunrise Road
Lot 13, Block 1 Suncliff 0 Addition
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD Low Density
ZONING: PD Planned Development
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a 7-foot building setback (30' standard) from a
public right-of-way (Timber Wolf Trail) and a Variance of 1.4% from the maximum 20 percent
lot coverage allowed in a residential zoning district for Lot 13, Block 1 Sun Cliff 1St Addition
(PID # 10-72975-130-01) in the NW'/4 of Section 29.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 3C states that the Council may grant a
variance and impose conditions and safeguards only if.
1. The Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in
question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply
generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the
granting of the application is necessary for the applicant.
2. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and
the Comprehensive Guide Plan.
3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is
necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Planning Report-Khanchandani Variance
September 12, 2001
Page 2
CODE REQUIREMENTS
The approved Sun Cliff preliminary plat agreement requires that an application for Variance be
submitted for setback purposes for lots and internal streets that do not meet the requirements
established in the Eagan Hills West Planned Development. The Eagan Hills West Planned
Development requires a 30-foot setback from any abutting right-of-way for all developments
within its area. All other standard code provisions shall apply unless granted a Variance by the
City Council.
City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.20, Subdivision 6, F. requires that all buildings shall not cover
more that 20 percent of the site area. Uncovered decks are not calculated in total building
coverage.
BACKGROUNDIHISTORY
Sun Cliff 1St Addition received approval January 19, 1983 and is part of the Eagan Hills West
Planned Development established in 1979. Sun Cliff lst Addition was platted as part of this
Planned Development to allow for single family detached dwelling units on lot sizes smaller than
allowed by City Code Standards.
On June 5, 1984 the City Council approved Variances for several corner lots in Sun Cliff 1St
Addition to allow for twenty foot setbacks from public rights-of-way. A building permit was
approved for the subject property in 1985 for a single family detached dwelling unit. It is
assumed that the subject lot was included in the Variance approval as there is no documentation
on file indicating what lots were involved, except for a certificate of survey with the building
permit application. This certificate notes an approved 21-foot setback along Timber Wolf Trail.
According to the applicant, the existing deck located on the southeast side of the subject home
was constructed at the same time as the principle structure.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject lot is approximately 9,370 square feet in area and contains an existing home covering
1,671 square feet including attached garage, creating a 17.8 percent building lot coverage. The
existing living space is setback 21 feet on the southeast side of the dwelling unit from the Timber
Wolf Trail right-of-way. Timber Wolf Trail is a 50 foot right-of-way.
A 14-foot deck exists on the southeast side of the dwelling unit. The footings of the deck appear
to be setback approximately 10 feet from the Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way.
The subject lot has a grade change on the southeast side of approximately 6-7 feet. A retaining
wall with established landscaping exists along the south portion of the lot. Several established
trees existing between the subject property and the neighboring property to the northwest. Two
relatively small cottonwood trees are located adjacent to the existing deck.
6
Planning Report-Khanchandani Variance
September 12, 2001
Page 3
The property immediately northwest of the subject lot along Timber Wolf Trail is of similar size
but the existing dwelling unit is set sideways on the lot and back 30 feet from the Timber Wolf
Trail right-of-way.
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
The applicant is proposing to remove the existing deck on the southwest side of the house and
replace it with a 14' x 24' living space addition. The addition would project 14 feet into the
previously approved 21-foot setback allowance leaving a 7-foot setback from the Timber Wolf
Trail right-of-way. Also, the proposed addition would add 336 square feet to the existing
building coverage, creating a lot coverage of 21.4 percent.
The applicant has submitted basic elevation drawings of the proposed addition showing siding,
soffits, fascia, and roofing to match the existing home. Windows are proposed on all three
exposed sides of the structure. A fencing type material is proposed to cover the sub-floor
exterior to grade level.
The existing retaining wall on the south corner of the property and established landscaping
located on both the south and west sides of the home will assist in screening the proposed
addition thus minimizing its impact from Sunrise Road and the neighboring property to the
northwest. According to the applicant, one of the existing cottonwood trees would be removed to
construct the addition.
APPLICANT'S ESTIMATE OF HARDSHIP
The applicant has stated that their large family and day care in their home necessitates an
expansion of living space. According to the applicant, attempts were made to design the
expansion to the rear of the home but these failed, as a logical interior plan could not be devised.
The applicant beliefs that the lot size and corner configuration of the subject lot is extremely
confining. He has stated that the existing deck has not presented a problem with aesthetics or
open space and that converting it to living space should not be any more obtrusive.
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The applicant desires an expansion of the existing home to accommodate family needs and is
proposing to construct a 336 square foot living space addition along the southeast side of the
existing home adjacent to the Tiber Wolf Trail right-of-way. The proposed addition would
require City Council approval of an additional 14-foot Variance to setback requirements from
public rights-of-way and a Variance to exceed the 20 percent maximum lot coverage requirement
by 1.4 percent.
O
~ r
Planning Report-Khanchandani Variance
September 12, 2001
Page 4
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To recommend approval of Variance to allow for a 7-foot setback from a public right-of-way
and a Variance to exceed the 20 percent maximum lot coverage requirement by 1.4 percent in a
residential district.
1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it
shall become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the council.
Such extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state
facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance.
2. The expansion exterior shall match the existing home.
3. Landscaping removed to accommodate the building expansion shall be replaced.
I
Eagan Boundary
Street Area ine
Location Map Parcel Area
Building Footprint
® ~ a
ed,
m ,
a
w ® 6 no e M 'p a&
A 4A @ n era. u. uw
}b 3
e
I' MOM'
~
A t ®ES
® IL_
i
+I €A e.
NF&
v ~ ~ ~ ~ q°rM~ G v
A ~c .c v, `GFv
o Sub"ect Sit
®e q c 1 4
~ A
xM=
w. any
Ell
id / ® ara c r ~ ® ~ ~
1000 0 1000 2000 Feet
Development/Developer. Raj Khanchandani
Application: Variance
Case No.: 29-VA-23-018-01
Map Prepared using ERSI nrcV'ew 5.1. Parcel bass map data provided N
by Dakota County Land Survey Departrnant and is current as of June 2001.
THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E
City of Eagan
64 S ^v r A The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are S
Gorrrmuraty Dwelopmant Department not responsible for errors or omissions.
I T
77,
rc ~i
.r elfA%
YA
1
74
* C ~ S air 3- 8 6 ; ~S'(r ~rr3'
..fi er J l~ T
r
4277 Sunrise Road - Southwest and Southeast Elevations
f
EEL
Y ai. 5r.
1 s . ~a
s'
4 T,
K
JAI,
*17 zI,
► r~
4277 Sunrise Road - Southwest and Northwest Elevations
1~3
i
peon -astiun-S------------------------
qjnD
o
3z;
G, .4t
~?i c ~ 2~ X00
! 40
?"P.~ a - 9~P
°a ! 4m4.
O PPP o l
a ;
i co ~4
! ''%o a ~®P
5 ~ yu`'v°t x'60 40 4
I noP~%
~ b t''~PP yJf/yOb
C P~f. S f / °Y +
o
i `
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
PUBLIC HEARINGS
C. CONSIDER RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND
ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
WITHIN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND
ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
THEREFOR
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To give staff direction regarding redevelopment district boundaries, specifically relating
to the request of Doris Dahline, 3830 Alder Lane, to be removed from future
consideration within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To approve a resolution adopting the redevelopment plan for the Cedar Grove
Redevelopment Area, and establishing Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 within the
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, and adopting the plans therefor.
FACTS (DAHLINE REQUEST):
• Ms. Doris Dahline, 3830 Alder Lane, has appeared before the City Council on a
number of occasions to state her desire not to be included in the Cedar Grove Tax
Increment Financing Redevelopment District.
• The City has received a letter from the attorney representing Ms. Dahline asking that
the City contractually agree to allow Ms. Dahline to remain in her home, without
threat of condemnation, for the remainder of her life.
• Staff has reviewed the request in terms of its potential impact on the redevelopment
effort. A staff memo from Assistant City Administrator Verbrugge outlining possible
options for the City Council is attached.
• The City has also received correspondence from Ms. Dahline that she asked be
included in this packet.
FACTS (TIF ADOPTION):
• The City of Eagan has been studying the possibility of redevelopment in the Cedar
Grove Redevelopment Area for over two years.
• The proposed Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District will give the City the
authority to use the mechanism known as tax increment financing to spur
development and reinvestment in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area.
• The Advisory Planning Commission has had an opportunity to review the draft
redevelopment plans, as well as the proposed TIF district and TIF plans, and passed a
resolution supporting the plans at its meeting on July 24, 2001.
• The Eagan Economic Development Authority similarly has reviewed the plans. A
resolution of the EDA was passed on August 7, 2001, to approve the plans.
• The Public Hearing for this item was originally scheduled for August 21, 2001. At
that time, property inspections to determine district eligibility qualification had not
been fully completed. The Public Hearing was continued to October 2, 2001.
• Property inspections and lot coverage analysis are complete. In order to qualify a
redevelopment district, more than 50% of the buildings must be determined to be
"substandard" according to statutory guidelines. The analysis shows that 60% of
buildings within the proposed boundaries meet the substandard criteria. Lot coverage
also meets the 70% statutory requirement.
• Legal notice of the Public Hearing was published on September 20, 2001.
• Sid Inman and Jim Prosser of Ehlers and Associates, the City's project management
consultant for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment, will make a brief presentation
regarding the proposed Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District.
ATTACHMENTS: Q
• The resolution is attached on pages Othrough 0
The Redevelopment Plan for the establishment of The Cedar Grove Redevelopment
Project Area is attached on pages _Uthrough/,a.
• The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the establishment of Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1 (a redevelopment district) is attached on pages "hrough P5, 9.
• SEH Redevelopmen Eli i ility Assessment executive summary report is attached on
pages/4through Z4 111k
• SEH assessment analysis is attached on page~Athrough 112.9
Ms. Dahline is attached on a esIGO through
Letter from attorney representing p g L
• Staff memo regarding options for the Dahline property is attached on pages
through.
• Correspondence from Ms. Dahline is located on pagesl~through L73.
CITY OF EAGAN
STATE OF MESNESOTA
Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CEDAR
GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO.1 WTTBIN THE CEDAR GROVE
REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Eagan, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Board of Commissioners (the "Board") of the Eagan Economic Development
Authority (the "EDA") has heretofore established the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area and adopted the
Redevelopment Plan therefor. It has been proposed by the EDA and the City that the City adopt the
Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area and establish Tax Increment Financing
District No. 1 (the "District") therein and adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor (collectively,
the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, 469.090
through 469.1081 and 469.174 through 469.179, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in
the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration.
1.02. The EDA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the
Plans to be prepared.
1.03. The EDA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to
the establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not
limited to, notification of Dakota County and Independent School District No. 191 having taxing
jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, notification of the county commissioner
representing the area of the District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning
Commission, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law.
1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities
contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and submitted to the Council and/or made a
part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or
substantiation constituting or relating to the bases for the other findings and determinations made in this
resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated
into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein.
Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Plans.
2.01. The Council hereby finds that the Plans, are intended and, in the judgment of this
Council, the effect of such actions will be, to provide an impetus for development in the public purpose
and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Plans, which are hereby incorporated herein.
Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1.
3.01. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment
district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10 (a)(1).
3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of
the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be
less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after
subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District
permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan, that the Plans conform to the general plan for the
development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the Plans will afford maximum
opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment
of the District by private enterprise.
3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings
stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing,
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3.04. The Eagan Economic Development Authority elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the
District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause a, which means the
fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from outside the District.
Section 4. Public Purpose
4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will
help fulfill a need to redevelop an area of the City which is already built up, and help correct conditions
that allow designation as a redevelopment district under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, including,
but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements
or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site
of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of the land,
the removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to development of the land, and installation
of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site.
Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans.
5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the
findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and
adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to
proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council
for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose.
5.03 The Auditor of is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the District, as
described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax
capacity has increased or decreased; and the Eagan Economic Development Authority is authorized and
directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor
may specify, together with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been
9l~
1 1
issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution.
5.04. The Assistant City Administrator is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the
Plans with the Commissioner of Revenue.
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member
, and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof.
and the following voted against the same:
Dated: October 2, 2001
ATTEST:
Mayor Assistant City Administrator
(Seal)
9
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION #
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for
Tax Increment Financing District No. 1, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175,
Subdivision 3 are as follows:
1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section
469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1).
The District consists of 98 parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for owner occupied and rental housing,
retail and commercial development, and transit features. At least 70 percent of the area in the parcels in the
District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures
and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally
substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance (See Appendix F of the TIF Plan).
2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be
expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the
increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the
proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum
duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. I permitted by the Plan.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact
that the redevelopment proposed in this plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. Due to the
high cost of redevelopment on the parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, the limited amount
of commercial/industrial property for expansion adjacent to the existing project, the incompatible land uses
at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only
through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The selected developers will be asked for and
provide a letter and a proforma as justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax
increment assistance.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed
development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration
of the TIF District permitted by the Plan: The City supported this finding on the grounds that the cost of
site and public improvements and utilities add to the total redevelopment cost. Historically, site and public
improvements costs in this area have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance.
Therefore, the City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on
this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development.
A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and
the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. If all development which is proposed to
be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the District, the total increase in market value would be up
to $175,507,200. The present value of tax increments from the District is estimated to be $15,179,803. It
is the Council's finding that no development with a market value of greater than $160,327,397 would occur
without tax increment assistance in this district within 25 years. This finding is based upon evidence from
general past experience with the high cost of acquisition and public improvements in the general area of the
District (see Cashflow in Appendix D of the TIF Plan).
D
i
3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I conforms to the
general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission reviewed the Plan and found that the Plan conforms to the general development
plan of the City.
4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I will afford
maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or
redevelopment of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area by private enterprise.
The project to be assisted by the District will result in increased employment in the City and the State of
Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high quality
development to the City.
Through the implementation of the Plan, the EDA or City will increase the availability of safe and decent
life-cycle housing in the City.
As of August 16, 2001
Draft for City Council Review
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
for the establishment of
THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA
CITY OF EAGAN
DAKOTA COUNTY
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Public Hearing: August 21, 2001
Adopted:
EHLERS Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3060 Centre Point* Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105
A A S S O C I A T E S I N C (651) 697-8500 fax (651) 697-8555 www.ehlers-inc.com
~ r
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(for reference purposes only)
SECTION I
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR
THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 1-1
Subsection 1-1. Definitions 1-1
Subsection 1-2. Statutory Authority 1-2
Subsection 1-3. Statement of Findings and Public Purpose 1-2
Subsection 1-4. Statement of Objectives 1-3
Subsection 1-5. Statement of Public Facilities and Costs to Be Financed 1-4
Subsection 1-6. Funding of Developments and Redevelopments 1-4
Subsection 1-7. Environmental Controls 1-4
Subsection 1-8. Proposed Reuse of Property 1-4
Subsection 1-9. Open Space to Be Created 1-5
Subsection 1-10. Administration and Maintenance of
the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5
Subsection 1-11. Rehabilitation 1-5
Subsection 1-12. Property Acquisition 1-5
Subsection 1-13. Modification of the Redevelopment Plan and/or
the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5
Subsection 1-14. Description of Boundaries of
the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5
APPENDIX A - BOUNDARY MAP OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1 A-1
SECTION I
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA
Subsection 1-1. Definitions
The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, have the meanings herein specified,
unless the context otherwise specifically requires.
"City" means the City of Eagan.
"City Council" means the City Council of the City of Eagan.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the documents which contain the objectives, policies, standards and
programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands
and water within the City.
"County" means Dakota County, Minnesota.
"Enabling Act" means Minnesota Statues, 469.090 through 469.1081 and 469.001 through 469.047, as
amended and supplemented from time to time.
"Redevelopment Project" means the property within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area, as
described in the Redevelopment Plan.
"Redevelopment Plan" means this Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project
Area, as initially proposed, and as it shall be modified.
"EDA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 through 469.1081, inclusive as amended.
"HRA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 409.001 through 469.047, inclusive as amended.
"Land Use Regulations" means all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, and plans
relating to or governing the use of development of land in the City, including but not limited to
environmental, zoning and building code laws and regulations.
"Project Area" means the real property within the City constituting the Redevelopment Project.
"Public Costs" means the costs set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan,
and any other costs eligible to be financed by Tax Increments under the TIF Act, EDA Act or the HRA Act.
"Public Improvements" means the public improvements described in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax
Increment Financing Plan.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Bonds" means any tax increment bonds or notes issued by the EDA or the City to finance
the Public Costs as stated in the Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project and in the
Tax Increment Financing Plans, and any obligations issued to refund such bonds.
"TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 479.174 through 479.179, inclusive, as amended.
1- i
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area
i l
"Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or
to be established in the future in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area.
"Tax Increment Financing Plan" or "Plan" means the Plans adopted by the City for any Tax Increment
Financing District.
Subsection 1-2. Statutory Authority
The Enabling Act authorizes the City, upon certain public purpose findings by the City, to establish and
designate development and redevelopment projects within the City and to establish, develop and administer
redevelopment plans therefore to meet the needs and accomplish the public purposes specified in the
Statement of Findings and Public Purpose set forth in Subsection 1-3 below. In accordance with the purposes
set forth in the Enabling Act, the City has established the Redevelopment Project comprising the area
described on the attached Appendix A and have adopted this Redevelopment Plan therefore.
The T1F Act authorizes the City, upon certain findings, establish and designate tax increment financing
districts within the Redevelopment Project and to adopt and implement a tax increment financing plan to
accomplish the Redevelopment Plan established for the Redevelopment Project.
Subsection 1-3. Statement of Findings and Public Purpose
The City finds that there is a need for development within the City and Redevelopment Project to provide
employment opportunities, to improve the local tax base, and to improve the general economy of the City
and State. The sound development of the economic security of the people in the City depends upon proper
redevelopment of substandard, blighted, and/or marginal property, as provided in Minnesota Statutes Section
469.002, Subd. 14, and as further defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subd. 10, which includes
property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties whose values are too low to pay
for the public services required or rendered and properties whose lack of use or improper use has resulted
in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health, safety and welfare.
The City fords that in many cases, lands in a blighted or substandard area cannot be developed without
public participation and assistance in forms including property acquisition and/or write down, proper
planning, the financing of land assembly in the work of clearance or development and the making and/or
financing of various other public and private improvements and investments necessary for development. In
cases where the development of marginal and other property cannot be done by private enterprise alone, the
City believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers, to advance and spend public
money, and to provide the means and impetus for such development.
The City finds that in certain cases property within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area would
not or may not be available for the development without the specific financial aid to be sought, consistent
with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise, and that
the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole.
The City also finds that the welfare of the City and State requires the active promotion, attraction,
encouragement, and development of housing and economically sound industry and commerce through
governmental action for the purpose or preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas
of chronic unemployment. It shall also be the policy of the City to facilitate and encourage such action as
may be necessary to prevent the economic deterioration of such areas to the point where the process can be
reserved only by total redevelopment. Through the use of the powers conferred on the City pursuant to the
Enabling Act, promoting economic development and housing may prevent the occurrence of conditions
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-2
g~
requiring redevelopment and prevent the emergence of blight, marginal land, and substantial and persistent
unemployment.
The City also finds that the welfare of the City requires (1) the development and redevelopment of
blighted areas, in situations in which private enterprise would not act without government participation or
subsidies (2) removing, preventing, or reducing blight, blighting factors, and the causes of blight, and (3)
urban renewal projects to eliminate or prevent the development or spread of slums or blighted or
deteriorating areas.
Subsection 1-4. Statement of Objectives
The establishment of the Redevelopment Project in the City pursuant to the Enabling Act is necessary and
in the best interests of the City and its residents and is necessary to give the City the ability to meet certain
public purpose objectives that would not be obtainable in the foreseeable future without intervention by the
City in the normal development process.
The City intends, to the extent permitted by law, to accomplish the following objectives through the
implementation of the Redevelopment Plan:
1. Providing and securing the development of increased opportunities for families to reside in quality
owner-occupied housing, for senior citizens to choose from housing options which offer a wide array
of services without regard to income, and for residents looking for a wide range of multi-family units.
2. Promoting and securing the prompt development of property in the Redevelopment Project in a manner
consistent with the City's planning and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, which
property is less productive because of the lack of proper utilization and lack of investment, and thereby
promoting and securing the development of other land in the City;
3. Promoting and securing additional employment opportunities within the Redevelopment Project and the
City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards and
preventing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the
City;
4. Securing the increase in value of property subject to taxation by the City, School District, County and
any other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and
governmental services and programs required to be provided by them;
5. Securing the construction and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of public improvements in
the Redevelopment Project, which are necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the
Redevelopment Project.
6. Promoting the concentration of new unified development consisting of housing and commercial
development in the Redevelopment Project so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its
accessibility and prominence in the City.
7. Encouraging the expansion and improvement of local business, economic activity and development,
whenever possible.
8. Creating a desirable and unique character within the Redevelopment Project through quality land use
alternatives and design quality in new buildings.
City of Eagan. Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-3
I 1
9. To prevent the emergence of, and promote redevelopment of, blighted or marginal property.
Subsection 1-5. Statement of Public Facilities and Costs to Be Financed
The City will perform or cause to be performed, to the extent permitted by law, all project activities pursuant
to the Enabling Act, the TIF Act and other applicable state laws, and in doing so anticipates that the
following may, but are not required, to be undertaking by the City:
(a) The making of studies, planning, and other formal and informal activities relating to the
Redevelopment Plan.
(b) The implementation and administration of the Redevelopment Plan.
(c) The re-zoning of land within the City.
(d) The acquisition of property, or interests in property, by purchase or condemnation, which acquisition
is consistent with the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan.
(e) The preparation of property for use and development in accordance with applicable land use
regulations and any development agreements, including demolition of structures, clearance of sites,
environmental remediation, land preparation, and construction of necessary public improvements.
(f) The resale of property to private parties.
(g) The issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance the Public Costs of the Redevelopment Plan, and
the use of Tax Increments or other funds available to the the City to pay or finance the Public Costs incurred
or to be incurred pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan.
(h) The use of Tax Increments to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds or otherwise pay or
reimburse with interest the Public Costs.
Subsection 1-6. Funding of Developments and Redevelopments
It is anticipated that the Public Costs of the Redevelopment Plan will be paid from proceeds of Tax Increment
Bonds. The City reserves the right to utilize other available sources of revenue, including but not limited
to special assessments and user charges, which the City may apply to pay a portion of the Public Costs.
Subsection 1-7. Environmental Controls
All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner
consistent with existing environmental controls and all applicable land use regulations.
Subsection 1-8. Proposed Reuse of Property
The Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the City may acquire property and reconvey the same to another
entity. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City will require the execution
of a binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that Tax Increments or other funds
will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the
City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse
and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any development agreement to which the City is
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-4
8
a party.
Subsection 1-9. Open Space to Be Created
Any open space within the Redevelopment Project will be created in accordance with the zoning and land
use ordinances of the City.
Subsection 1-10. Administration and Maintenance of Redevelopment Project Area No.1
Maintenance and operation of the Redevelopment Project will be the responsibility of the Assistant City
Administrator. Each year, the administrator of the Redevelopment Project will submit to the City Council
the maintenance and operation budget for the following year.
The administrator of the Redevelopment Project will administer the Redevelopment Project pursuant to the
provisions of the Enabling Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction
of the City Council.
Subsection 1-11. Rehabilitation
Owners of properties within the Redevelopment Project may be encouraged to rehabilitate their properties
to conform with the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Persons
who purchase property within the Redevelopment Project from the City may be required to rehabilitate their
properties as a condition of sale of land. The City may provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be
available from federal, state or local sources.
Subsection 1-12. Property Acquisition
The City may acquire such property, or appropriate interest therein, within the Redevelopment Project Area
as the City may deem to be necessary or desirable to assist in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan.
Subsection 1-13. Modification of the Redevelopment Plan and/or the Cedar Grove
Redevelopment Project Area
The City reserves the right to alter and amend the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing
Plans, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The City specifically reserves the right
to enlarge or reduce the size of the Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing District, the
Redevelopment Plan, the Public Costs and the amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such
cost by following the procedures specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4.
Subsection 1-14. Description of Boundaries of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project
Area
The Redevelopment Project will contain the following parcels:
See map in Appendix A
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5
I ➢
APPENDIX A
BOUNDARY MAP OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-1
~~/i fib • 1
. log I
CO v V
o
I-- co CL
0
I0
10
' cac
• Z
O V
u.
.000* LM
: 0
~joe-
L
'000. m
00000,
tIY
000
I p
2D-Jul-01
*Lty of Eagan
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Parcel/Building Information
MAP ID: 1
TAXPI : 108808008200 Acres (OW acres of Tax ParoNk 14.0
Property Owner DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Lard Value. $517,400.00 Not Tax: $19,797.16
% RONALD A HAVE Assessed BId9. Value: $0.00 Speelal Assesanerd $0.00
8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $517,400.00 ToW Tax: $19,797.16
BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Lao Bob Dab (nw": 0 0 Be" Value: $0.00
Zon1w: 1.1 Land Use Guide: IND
Bldg. Date: YwBuift: Bum"Type:
FinlehW BId9. ft ft.: Garage 9% ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 2
TAXPN: 108806002000 Acres (toed sew al Tax Pucal) 1.1
Property Ownw- DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Land Value: $70.000.00 Net Tax: $2.752.40
% RONALD A HAVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assesamort $0.00
8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $70.000.00 Total Tax: $2,752.40
BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Lao Sob Date (W ft 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00
zar": 1.1 Land this GWrle: ND
Bldg. Data: YwBult er1ldln9Typs:
FMMMW Bldg. ft ft.: Gore" S4 fl:*
BEDS: BAM
MAP ID: 3
TAXPN: 1088080M001 Acres (IoW acres of Tax ParoMk 1.5
Property Owner PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $78,900.00 Net Tax: $1,209.54
144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $78.900.00 Total Tax: $1,209.54
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Loo Bob Dab (mryr). 0 0 SW Value: $0.00
Zordrg. R4 Lard Lee Gulls: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew suet: BuNdrq Type:
Fkd& W slap. 94 ft.: Garage ft fl:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 4
TAXPN: 108808008001 Acres (total acres of Tax Paroalk 1.5
Property Owner: PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $106,700.00 Net Tarc $1,869.68
144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 SpecW Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $1011,700.00 Total Tax: $1,889.68
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Lao Sale Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00
Mmft: R-4 Land the Oulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew BOL BUMV Type:
FMdW" slft ft ft.: Garage 5% ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 5
TAXPN: 101980001001 Agee (toW acres of Tax Pwm* 82
Property Oww SILVER BELL BUSINESS CENTER PC Assessed Land Valve: $628.000.00 No Tax: $149,457.06
%ELLIOT J LARSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $3,470.000.00 Special Assessnrnd $12,56528
PO BOX 100 Total Assessed Value: $4,0911,000.00 Total Tax: $162,022.34
WARROAD MN 567630100 Lest Sale Dab (mlyr): 11 1991 ask Value: $1.950.000.00
Zodng: PD Land tie Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bul t: 1985 Burdirg Type: WHSE,BUSCR
Me?" Bldg. Sq. fl.: 100.340.0 Geroge ft ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 32
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for dte Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-2
MAP ID: 6
TAXPN: 190190001102 Acres (toW acne of Tax Peed): 4.9
Property Owner. BERNARD J MULCANYCO INC Assessed Land Value: $145,000.00 Net Tax: $3,757.40
2700 BLUE WATER ROAD STE 100 Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $8.203.16
Toed Assessed Value: $145,000.00 Total Tax: $11,960.56
EAGAN MN 55121-1400 Last Sale Dab (mryr): 0 0 Sw Value: $0,00
Zoning: 1.1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew now: Gulkli gType:
faMalfed Bldg. Sq. to Garw Sq. R:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 7
TAXPN: 107850001001 Acres (total saes of Tax PwcW 6.0
Property Owner: TESSERACT OF EAGAN INC Assessed Land Value: $789,800.00 NO Tax: $134.311.00
7760 FRANCE AVE S STE 1430 Assessed Bldg. Value: $2,720200.00 Special Assessment $867.34
TOW Assessed Value: $3,490,000.00 Total Tax: $135,178.34
BLOOMINGTON MN 55435 Last Sale Dab (mNT): 0 0 SW Value: $0.00
Zoning: PD Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built- tees BuIldtm9 Type: CLASSROOM
Rnialed 8109. Sq. ff.: 35,9W.0 Geage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 10
MAP ID: 8
TAXPIN: 107550001000 Acme (IOW acne of Tax Paroeq 6.1
Property Owner. SILL PROPERTIES Assessed Land Value: $503.800.00 Nat Tax: $17,16414
5633 HWY 13 W Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Toed Assessed Value: $503,800.00 Total Tax: $17,164.14
SAVAGE MN 55378-1215 Last Sale Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00
Zoning: PD Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Built: Bwalng Type:
Fh" Bldg. Sq. tt.: Qea9e Sq &
BEDS BATH:
MAP ID: 9
TAXPN: 100190002025 Acres (total acres of Taft PareaQ: 6.9
Property Owner: R L BERNSTEIN Assessed Led Value: $295,800.00 Net Tae $24,069.06
% WM G SMALL Assessed Bldg. Value: $368,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00
9714 OLD KATY RD TOW Assessed Value: $864,800.00 Toed Tas: 524,069.06
HOUSTON TX 770556209 Last Sob Dab (rngr$ 0 0 saw Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1.1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Vow Bdn: 1963 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finial Bldg. Sq. fL: 22,240.0 Garep Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 10
TAXPN: 100190001025 Acres (toed saes of Tax Paroal): 0.6
Property Owner: SHELDON 8 MARY RAMNARINE Assessed Land Value: $16,000.00 Net Tax: $259.34
37&5 NICOLS RD Assessed BId9. Value. $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $16.000.00 Toed Tau: $259.34
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1016 Last Sale Dab (mryr): 0 0 Sob Value: $o.oo
Zoning: 1.1 Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew suit: Buedim9 Type:
finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: limps Sq. ft:
BEDS BATH:
MAP ID: 11
TAXPN: 100100003025 Acres (toed acres of Tax Panplk 7.6
Property Owner CfTY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $153,500.00 NO Tax: $0.00
3795 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Spacial Asaesened $0.00
Toed Assessed Value: $153,500.00 Toed Tax: $0.00
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1318 Lest Sale Dab (rnvyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1.1 Lead Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bniu: BuBdinp Type:
Finieled BId9. Sq. fL: Gerap S% ft
BEDS BATH:
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plant for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-3
I 1
MAP ID: 15
TAXPN: 101370007001 Acres (total was of Tax Parcel): 0.6
Property Owner: RANDALL J 8 SANDRA K GUAM Assessed Land Value, $82.100.00 NWT*:: =7,14052
3925 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed 8100. Value: $143.900.00 Special Assmearne t $0.00
Total Assessed Value: 1226,000.00 Total Tax: $7,140.52
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1415 Last Sale Deb (W r): 6 1992 Soft Value: 1205,000.00
Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw sure 1977 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finial red Bldg. Sq. It.: 7,090.0 Gmage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 16
TAXPN: 101370006001 Acres (total acres of Tat Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner KELLY 8 CONNIE PLOURDE Assessed Land Value: $60,900.00 NO Tax: $5,672.36
8100 AUTO CLUB RD UNIT 208 Assessed 914 Value: 8127200.00 Special AssesenNnt $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $188,000.00 Told Tjw $5.672.36
BLOOMINGTON had 55438.2488 Lao Sale Dab (Wien). 12 1992 Sale Valve: 888,914.00
Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: OFFICE
Fk9sNed Bldg. S% fL: 3,642.0 Greg. Sq. ft: O
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 17
TAXPN: 101370005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Ps, 0.8
Properly Aran JAMAL D ANSARI Assessed Land Value: $103,700.00 Net Tax: $4,852.60
3945 SIBLEY MFM HWY Assessed 9idg. Value: $58.900.00 apeclel Ammm" d $178.84
Total Assessed Value. $162,500.00 Total Tax: $4,831.54
SAINT PAUL MN 65122.1415 Last Sale Data (myr): 0 0 isle Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land I%@ Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw BURL 1976 BWW4* Two: RESTAURANT
FhdW d 9Wq. 8q fL- 3,042.0 Gerege $41. k: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 18
TAXPN: 101370004001 Acres (total saes of Tax Parcel: 0.9
Property Owner: SLED HEAD O C CADBA LARSONS AUTOMOTI Assessed Land value: $113,200.00 Net Tax: $4,816.02
3955 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,800.00 Special Assessment $196.99
Total Assessed Value: $165,000.00 Totai Tax: $5,013.00
EAGAN MN 55122.1411 Last Sale Dab (mfyr): 11 1994 aw Value: $178,106.00
Zoning: GB Land Use GWds: SA
Bldg. Deft: Vow Bun: 1991 St"ng Type: SERVC GAR
flydslled sidw ft fu 2.860.0 0 ge $4 ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 19
TAXPN: 101370003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9
Property Ownei CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $120.100.00 Net Tax: $0.00
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD Assessed Bldg. Value: 80.00 Special AaeaennMtt $0.00
Total Assessed Value: 8120,100.00 Total Tax: $0.00
EAGAN MN 55122-1810 Law Sob Data (mfy"- 0 0 Sole Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land Use GWds: SA
Bldg. Date: Ywsuft sWldingType:
Flrnbhsd Bldg. a4 fL: Gal 0 $4 ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 20
TAXPN: 101370002001 Acres (total saes of Tax Proal): 0.9
Properly Ownw STRATFORD HOLDINGLLC Assessed Lard Value: 8121,600.00 Not Tau: $8,690.60
%THE LANGFAN CO Assessed Bldg. Value: $140.400.00 Special Aasnment $210.32
6 45TH ST E Total Assessed Value: 1282,000.00 Told Tax: $6,900.92
NEW YORK NY 10017.2414 Last Sale Deb (w0ft 0 0 aid Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land Ua GWde: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw sun: 1976 sWlding Type: RETAIL STR
Rnhit" Bldg. esq. IL- 4,500.0 Grage 44 ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
City of Fagan Minnesota Redevelopment P for the Cc& Grove Redevelop mi: Project Area A-4
MAP ID: 21
TAXPN: 101370001001 Acres (toed acres of Tau Pmeal): 1.0
Property Owner. SUPERIOR COLLISION 6 PAINT INC Assessed Land Value: $133,000.00 Not Tax: $14,033.42
39115 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg Value: 1274,000.00 Special Assessnnni $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $407,000.00 Total Tat: $14,033.42
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1411 Last Sale Dab (mfyr): 0 0 Sam Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Buln: 1988 BuMdlrp Type: SERVO GAR
Rldalald Bldg. 8q. 1L: 14162.0 Garage ft ft:- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 22 _
TAXPN: 100190001003 Acres (tool saes of Tax ParoN): 0.7
Property Owner U-HAUL REAL ESTATE CO Assessed Land Value: $881800.00 Net Tax: $3,504.72
PO BOX 29048 Assessed Bldg. Yalue: $29' 00.00 Special Asse an eM $16220
Total Assessed Value: $118,000.00 Total Tax: $3,666.92
PHOENIX AZ 85038-9046 Last $W Dab (aAft 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land Use Guido: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1965 "ding Type. SERVC GAR
Rnished Bldg. Sq. }L: 1,534.0 Gape 84 R 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 25
TAXPN: 101670204108 Acres (tool acres of Tax Peroal): 0.7
Property Owner. JOSEPH L 6 ELISE D STEINFELD Assessed Land Value: $41,800.00 Nal Tax: $4,865.82
%ASK FINANCIAL Assessed Bldg. Value: $127,000.00 Spedal Aaeeesm rd $0.00
4040 NICOLS RD Total Assessed Value: $188,600.00 Toed Tat: $4,865.82
EAGAN MN 55122-1906 test Soft Dab (mlyr): 5 1998 840 Value: $154,000.00
Zoning: LB Land Use Qulde: SA
Bldg. Data: YwBugh 1978 BwldlngType: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. B¢ !L: 3,912.0 n ge ft It- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 26
TAXPN: 101.10203106 Acres (total sores of Tat Pam@* 0.3
Property Owner. LAWRENCE W 8 DONEENE WENZEI Assessed Land Value: $20.400.00 Net Tax: $330.78
3800 KENNEBEE DR Assessed Bldg Value: $0.00 Special Ass"arnent $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $20,400.00 Total Tax: $330.78
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Leal 609 Dale (rNyrr 0 0 tam Value: $0.00
Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew bate. Building T"m
Brushed Bldg Sq. ft-- Q ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 27
TAXPN: 101670202008 Acres (tom scree of Tax Perselg 0.3
Property Owner: LAWRENCE W a DONEENE WENZEL Assessed Land Value: $36,900.00 Net Tax: $564.42
3800 KENNESEE DR Assessed Bldg Value: $0.00 Special Assesarrant $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $36,900.00 Toed Tax: $564.42
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sele Dab (w9p): 0 0 SW Value: $0.00
Zoning; LB Lard Use Guido: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bulls: BuNding Type:
Finished Bldg Sq. fL: -Garage B4 R:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 28
TAXPN: 101070201008 Agee (tool saes of Tax Paroal): 0.3
Property Owner. DENNIS D & FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Land Value: $36,900.00 Net Tax: $564.42
50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: 838.900.00 Total Tax: $564.42
MINNEAPOLIS MN 564031145 Last Bale Deb (mryr): 0 0 We Value: $0.00
Zoning: LB Lard Use Gulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bunk: Building Type:
FWShed Bldg. Sq. ft- n 9 Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopmatt Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopnmt Project Area A-5
y
1 p
MAP ID: 29
TAXPN: 100190010008 Arne (total acres of Tat Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner. WING K SETO Assessed Land Value: $93.5W= fW Tax: $5272.32
4730 OAK CUFF DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $80,200.00 Special Aseeaenwni $516.60
Total Assessed Value: $173.700.00 Total Tax: $5.788.92
EAGAN MN 55122.3301 Last Sale, Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Sam Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built 1968 area I Type: RESTAURANT
Rnm" Bldg. Sq. fL: 2,534.0 Oarage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 30
TAXPN: 101382001000 Acres (total acres of Tax ParcN): 32
Property Oww: DENNIS D & FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Lard Value: $57,800.00 Nei Tax: $1,706.04
50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Asaaesment $820.86
Toth Assessed Valrw: $57,800.00 TOW Tax: $2.526.90
MINNEAPOLIS MN S5403.1145 Last Sale Dam (ar/yr) O 0 Bob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Les Gulds: SA
Bldg. Data: YwBuilt wlldingTwo:
Finialred Bldg. Sq. 1L: Oraye Sq. ft
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 31
TAXPIN: 101352001001 Acres (toed aria of Tax PsroN): 0.7
Property Owner. TIMOTHY J BEEBE Assessed Land Value: $50.300.00 Not Tax: $1,51024
1671 E OLD SHAKOPEE RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $800.00 Special Asaessnrnt $0.00
Toed Assessed Value: $50,900.00 Toed Tax: $1,51024
BLOOMINGTON MN 55425.2444 Last Bob Dab (ft*y 12 1987 arm Value: $111,750.00
Zoning; CSC Land Use Grrlds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bullt 1930 Building TV": SHEO,EOUIP
Rnlalted Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,716.0 Garage 84 It 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
MAP ID: 32
TAXPN: 101352002001 Acres (total arse of Tax Parcel) 0.5
Property Omer: WADE H & DEBRA L YARBROI-GH Assessed Land Value: $37,800.00 Nal Tax: $3,944.50
12916 HAMLET AVE Assessed Bldg. Value. $107200.00 Special Assessment $122.10
Total Assessed Value: $145,000.00 ToW Tax: $4,056.W
SAINT PAUL MN $5124-9730 Last SW Dam (mlyr): 2 1988 Sam Value: $180,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bust: 1967 atnllding Type: OFFICE
RM~ Bmlg. Sq. ft.: 7,200.0 Gsrsge aq ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 33
TAXPN: 100190002012 Acres (total acres of Tax Paroal): 1.7
Property Owner. GORDON S AUCE KOPACEK Assessed Land Value: $116,600.00 Net Tax: $4,259.88
4000 BEAU D'RL E DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 570,200.00 Special Asseesn»M $398.90
Toed Assessed Value: $186,800.00 Total Tax: $4,658.78
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sam Dab (nifyr) 0 0 Sam value: $0.00
Zmkv: CSC Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bust 1940 SuNdlrlg Type: SHED,EOUIP
FAM*d Bldg. Sq. ft- 1.900.0 tiange Sol. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
Bldg. Data: Year Bust 1955 Building Type: SHED,EOIIIP
FhW" Bldg. ft lu 2.184.0 awe" 841t 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
Bldg. Data: Yew Built. 1954 BuildingTyps: S.FAM.RES
Phgml adg. Sq. ft_ 1,016.0 Garage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 2 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 34
TAXPN: 100190003012 Acres (total sores of Tax Pancel): 1.8
Property 0w.m HANSEN METCALF ENT Assessed Land Value: $122,300.00 Net Tax: $7201.94
3990 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $103,200.00 Special Aeseswmd $417.18
Total Assessed Value: $225,500.00 Toed Tax: $7,619.12
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sam Dab (Myr) 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bust 1958 atnadhq Type: VET HSPTL
Finished Sidg. Sq. fL• 4.752.0 Garage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
City Of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Coder Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-6
S
MAP ID: 35
TAXPN: 101670201000 Aces (total acres of Tax Psm 4.3
property Owner. LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Vapw: $23.200.00 fist Tax: $357.10
1077 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Valor: 60.00 Special Assessment 6651.34
APT 801 Total Assessed Value: $23200.00 Total Tax: 61,008.44
SAINT PAUL MN 551185612 Last Sale left (nVy* 0 0 Sale Value $0.00
Zoning: R•1 Land Use Qodr: SA
Bldg. Data: TwBult 3WdIngTV":
Finial red adg.141L: Grsge Sq ft
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 36
TAXPId: 180110001111 Acres (total aces of Tax Paroalr 9.6
Properly Owner LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Vakn: $419.900.00 Net Tax $14,575.72
1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY AFT 106 Assessed Bldg. Value: 648.200.00 Special Assessment 61.882.44
Toed Assessed Valro: $468,100.00 ToW Tax $16,458.16
SAINT PAUL MN 55118.3667 Last SW* Dab (mly* 0 0 SW Value 60.00
Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Vow aa9t 1900 Bull" Type: S.FAM.RES
F%90*d BMW fiq.fL: 1,228.0 Garage sq fl: o
BEDS: 2 BATH: 1
Bldg. Data: Yew 014111L. 1985 BalldingType: WHSE,STRG
FinWW Bldg. Sq. ft- 30,000.0 Qalage Sq. ft* 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 37
TAXPN: 100190004112 Acres (total acres of Tax ParosQ 0.6
Property Owner: JOOS ELECTRIC OO Assessed Wed Value: $37200.00 NM Tax $1,815.34
3980 BEAUDRUE OR Assessed Brig. Valm: $27,000.00 SpmW Assessnwri 60.00
ToW Assessed Valve: $64,200.00 Total Tax $1,815.34
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Deb (mfy* 0 O Sob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC WM Use Grids: SA
Bldg. Data: YwBulk: 1980 Building Type: OFFICE
Rr Wed Brig. 8% fL: 2012.0 Gres Sq. ft- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 38
TAXPN: 100190004212 Acres (total acres of Tax ParosQ: 1.0
Proprly Owner: JOHN R LACHENMAYER Assessed Lard Value: $80,800.00 Net Tax: $1,015.30
3066 BEAU D RUE OR Assessed Bldg. Valve: $106,400.00 Special Apassment 6180.84
Toed Assessed Value: $109200.00 Toed Tax: $1,196.14
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sale Dab (ntfy* 9 1992 SW Value: $87,500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Quids: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Built 19W BuNding Type: S.FAMLRES
Finial Bldg. Sob fl.: 2,049.0 Garage ft ft 0
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
MAP ID: 39
TAXPN: 100190001211 Mass (t*W scree of Tax ParoW.. 1.9
Proprty Owner: LEO M)GOL Assessed Land Value: $103,800.00 Net Tax $4250.18
1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY APT 106 Assessed $Idg. Value: $400.00 Special Aesseresni 6438.44
Total Assessed Vallee: 6104,200.00 Toed Tax: $4,688.62
SAINT PAUL MN 551183667 Last Sob Dab (*OM: 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00
Zoning: A Land Use Quids: SA
Bldg. Data: YwBulit 1915 Boding TWO: WHSE.STRG
FMished Brig. 8% fta 12,385.0 Garage Sq ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
Bldg. Data: Yw edit 1915 Building Type: WHSE STRG
Rnbhad Brig. ft ft: 4.888.0 Garage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
Bldg. Data: Yw Built 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. ft IL: 4.500.0 Geroge Sq. ft. 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
Bldg. Data: VOW Built: 1915 Bolding Type: WHSE.STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 3.616.0 Garage ft ft- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
City of Eagan. Minnesota Redevelopient Plan for the Cedar Gmve Redevelopment Project Area A-7
6
MAP ID: 40
TAXPN. 100190001008 Acres (total acres of Tax Pat 1.6
Property Owner. SINCWR MARKETING INC Assessed Land Value: $169,900.00 ""Tax: $5.966.72
SW E SOUTH TEMPLE Assessed Bldg. Value: $25,100.00 SpwW Aaseeemeni $2,188.74
PO BOX 30825 Total Assessed Value: $195,000.00 Total Tax: $8,155.46
SALT LAKE CITY LIT 84102-1005 Last Sob Dab (mryrj 0 0 aeb Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Buih: 1965 Building Type: SERVO STN
Rrd~ Bldg. Sq. R: 1,247.0 Garage ft ft- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 41
TAXPN: 100190009008 Acres (toed acres of Tax Pal OS
PropertyOwner JEFFREY SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $58,600.00 Net Tax: $3,698.12
1009 99TH ST Assessed slag. Value: $71,900.00 Special Apesarnem $122.42
Total Assessed Value: $130,500.00 Total Tax: $3,820.54
ROBERTS WI 54023.8405 Last Sob Dab (mfyr): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1968 Boding Type: CARWASH
Rnlahed Bldg. S4 ft• 2,562-0 Garage Sq. It- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
MAP ID: 42
TAXPN: 100190002008 Acres (toed acres of Tax Paroeq: 0.3
Proparty Owen: LARRY FRATTALONE Assessed Wed Value: $30,000.00 Net Tax: $3,275.82
3527 LEXINGTON AVE N Assessed Bldg. Value: $85,800.00 Special Aseesamant $78.48
Toed Assessed Value: $115,800.00 Taal Tax: $3,354.30
ARDEN HILLS. MN 55126 Last Sob Dab (nW): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Bunk: 1965 Building Type: RETAIL STR
Finished Blft ft fU 5,000.0 Garage ft ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 43
TAXPN: 100190003008 Acres (toed acres of Tax Parosq: 0.4
Pnoparty Owner. GERALD HUSTON Assessed Land Value: $38.000.00 Net Tax: $2.049.66
808 OAKLAND OR Assessed Bldg. Value: $34,700.00 3~ Assessment $99.40
Toed Assessed Value: $72,700.00 Total Talc $2,149.06
BURNSVIL LE MN 553373004 Last Sale Date (agyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SMOD
Zoning: CSC Wed Use Guide. SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Bust: 1967 Bullom Type: RETNL STR
fbd~ Bldg. Sq. ft.: 3,346.0 Garage ft ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 44
TAXPN: 100190007008 Acres (total aces of Tax ParoN): 0.7
PropertyOwen: BTA INV Assessed Land Value: $75,300.00 Net Tax: $7,947.80
%JAMES COOPER Assessed Bidg. Value: $172,000.00 Special Amse msnt $0.00
3989 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $247,300.00 Total Tar. $7,947.80
EAGAN MN 55122.1421 Last Sob Dab (mlyr) 4 1987 Sob Value: $200,ODD.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1970 BuNding Type: SERVC GAR
ft" Mdg. ft ft- 8,494.0 Garage esq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 45
TAXPN: 1001900040es Acres (total accts of Tax ParoN): 0.4
Proparty Owner. ROCKY L RANCH Assessed Land Value. $35,800.00 Net Tax: $2,316.74
18901 JORDAN TRL Assessed Bidg. Value: $45,700.00 apedal AssesenMni $0.00
Total Assessed Value: 6111,300.00 Total Tax: $2,316.74
LAK VILLE MN 55044-7776 Wt Sob Dab (nVM: a 1984 SW Value: $67,500.00
Zoning: CSC W W Use Guide. SA
Bldg. Data: Year Bunk: 1968 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bidg. Sq. ft_• 1,920.0 Garage esq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
City of Fagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-8
MAP ID: 46
TAXPN: 100190005008 Ames (total ecres ct Tax Para1$ 0.3
Property Owner. JEFFREY D 8 SARAH J SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $24.800.00 Not Tax: 51,915.94
1009 99TH ST Assessed Bldg. Value: $42,300.00 Special Assessrtrnt $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $67,100.00 Told Tax: $1,915.94
ROBERTS WI 54023.8405 Last Bob Dale ptYyr): 12 1989 Sale Value: $60,000.00
Zoning: CSC land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1965 wldingType: LAUNDROMAT
FMbhed Bldg. Sq. 1L: 1,520.0 Garage S q- ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 47
TAXPN: 100190008008 Awns (Dotal acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property owner JOSEPH R MILBAUER Assessed Land Value: $4400.00 Net Tax: $5,497.10
3997 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $138.900.00 SpeeW Aessssmer t $0.00
ToW Assessed Value: $183,400.00 Total Tax: $5,497.10
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1421 Last $elo on" (mlyr): 0 0 Sam Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1968 wiling Type: RETAIL STR
Finished Bldg. Ba. ft: 4,000.0 Garage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 48
TAXPN: 100190002007 Acres (told acres of Tax Parcel): 0.8
Properly Owner. STEVE J 6 JANE M MARTIN Assessed Land Value: $81200.00 NOT= $8,581.12
920 HARRIET AVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $182,700.00 Special Assessment 5296.62
Told Assessed Value: 1263,900.00 Told Tax: $8.677.74
SAINT PAUL MN 55126.WSI Last Sera Dam (aVyr): 12 1990 Bab value: $275,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Lin Guldle: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1971 molding Type: DAYCARECTR
Finished Bldg. Sq. 1t_ 3,480.0 Garsgs Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 49
TAXPIN: 100190001006 Acres (told saes of Tax Parcel0.7
Property Owner. JOHN E 1 KATHLEEN LUNDEEN Assessed Land Value: $57,900.00 Net Tax: $5,905.62
8009 PENNSYLVANIA RD Assessed Bidg. Value: $140,100.00 Spedal AssessmrM $151.46
Total Assessed Value: $196,000.00 Told Tax: $6,057.06
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55438.1134 Last Sob Dam (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land ties Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew wit 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 9,130.0 Garage ft ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH_ 4
MAP ID: 50
TAXPN: 100190001107 Acres (told acres of Tax Parcel): 02
Property Owner JOHN W FITZGERALD Assessed Land Value: $24,100.00 NN Tax: $4,82320
3914 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $149,900.00 Bps" Aaaesamenl $82.66
Told Assessed Value: $174,000.00 Told Tax: $4,905.86
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sole Dam (ab": 12 1994 SW Value: $117,292.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1972 Building Type: OFFICE
FWaled Bldg. Sq ft- &5W.0 Garage ft ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 51
TAXPN: 100190005106 Acres (told acres of Tax Parcel): 12.1
Property Owner WAYZATA BAY CTR CO Assessed L&W Value: $1,050,200.00 Net Tax: $103,921.30
PO BOX 834 Assessed Bldg. Value: $1.637,600.00 Spa" Assessment $4,730.22
Told Assessed Value: $2,687,800.00 Told Tax: $108,851.52
NEW UL M MN 580730834 Last Sale Dam (nVyr): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC LOW Use Oulde: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1965 molding Typo: BHPCTR COM
Finished Bldg. S¢ a.: 152,000.0 Garage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 5
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-9
I (
MAP ID: 52
TAXPN: 100190001006 Acres (total acres of Tax Pseal): 3.5
Property Owner: MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed Lard Value: $276,800.00 No Tax: $17,649.38
3900 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 5220.200.00 Special Aaee"ment $1.370.62
Total Assessed Value: $497,000.00 Total Tax: $19.020.00
EAGAN MN 55122-1414 last sale Dab (sees yr): 0 0 Stale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Date: VOW sae: 1963 &"ng Ty": MICE
farishad Bldg. Sq. ft.: 13,811.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 4
TAXPN: 100190001106 Acres (toed acres of Tax l1w 3 5
fhaperty OaRer MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed LOW Value: $12,000.00 Net Tax: $48718
3900 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $12,000.00 Total Tax: $487.78
EAGAN MN 55122-1414 Last Sees Dale (rltyf): 0 0 Bale Valve: 50.00
Zaing: CSC Land Use Outds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew 91101L. &"ngType:
fiisl»d Bldg. ft IL: aww Bq fL•
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 53
TAXPN: 100190007106 CONDO Acres (total acne of Tax PsreN):
Prapelty Orrrer PAUL C BECKER Assessed Land Value: $19200.00 Net Tax: $1,185.74
3012 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg Value: $24.500.00 Speeds Ae umesse t $0.00
Toted Assessed Value: $43,700.00 TOW Tax: $1,185.74
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last 5a» DSM (rrllyr): 2 1997 tuts Valve: $36,000.00
Zoning: CSC LsW Use Oulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Bulk 1969 Bu9ding Type: OFFICE
Finds! d Bldg ft fL: 900.0 Garage ft ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
TAXPN: 100190007206 CONDO Acres (toW am of Tax Parcel):
Property Ayer: PAUL BECKER Assessed Lads Value: $23200.00 Net Tax: $1,408.38
3908 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg Value: $28.700.00 Spa" Assawserd $39.24
Total Assessed Value: $51,900.00 Total Tax: $1,447.82
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1414 Last Sale Data (nVyr): 12 1968 tAle Yokes: $82,500.00
Zoning: CSC L&W Use tilde: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Nmilt 1969 Welding Type: OFC,MD/DTL
RnW" eidg ft fl: 1.000.0 Osage Sq ft- 0
BEDS: O BATH: /
TAXPN: IOM90007$06 OONDO Acres (IoW crams of Tax less
os1):
Property Owner LAWRENCE D & LESLIE HAUOEN Assessed Land Value: $14,400.00 Not Tax: $914.66
4098 HALITE LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $19,300.00 Spada Aseessnert $3924
Total Assessed Value: $331700.00 Toed Tax: $953.90
EAGAN MN 55122-2914 Last SW Dale (nVyr): 0 0 left Value. $0.00
Zoning: CSC Lard Use Odds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew su11t: 1969 wilding Type OFFICE
MM Bldg ft ff.: 670.0 Garage ft ft. 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
TAXPN: 100190007406 CONDO Aegis (taMl craw of Tars Pareel):
ftopwty Owner. ALAN PAYMAR Assessed Land Valve: $23,200.00 No Tax: $1,625.10
3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg value: $36.700.00 Special Assesensenl $39.24
TOW Assessed Valve: $59,900.00 TOW Tax: $1,664.34
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1414 Last Sale Data (ndyr): 0 0 gob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC LW W Use (Aids: SA
Bldg. Data: Vow edit: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE
RM~ slag Sq. f4 1,246.0 Garage ft ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 54
TAXPN: 1016=12201 Acres (total saes of Tax ParoN): 0.1
Property Owner AMERICAN ACCOUNTS& ADVISORS INC Assessed Lard Valise: $12,300.00 NM Tax: SZ758.82
3904 CEDARVALE OR Assessed Bldg Valve: $72.700.00 Bps" Asesernsnt $0.00
TOW Assessed Value: $85.000.00 Total Tax: $2,758.82
EAGAN MN 55122.1410 last Sale Data (nWyr): 0 0 SaN Valve: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Oulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built. 1976 suuding Type: OFFICE
PNtalled Bldg Sq. fL: 2,400.0 Gasps $q. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-10
C19
MAP ID: 55
TAXPN: 101885012301 Aass (total aces of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Properly Owner AMERICAN ACCOUNTSB ADVISORS INC Assessed Lard Value: $15,100.00 Nat Tax: $3,044.68
3904 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $92,400.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $107,500.00 Tool Tax: $3,044.68
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1410 Last $404 Dab (rniyr): 9 1995 SW Value: $99,500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use OaWs: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew BuOt 1978 Building Type: OFFICE
Flnisfed Bldg. Sq. ft.; 3.168.0 Garage Sq.11: 0
BEDS: O BATH: 2
MAP ID: 56
TAXPN: 101185003101 Aces (total saes of Tax ParoN): 02
Property Owner MARK S TSTE PARLANTO Assessed Led Value: $22,600.00 Net Tax: $4,277.10
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $128,400.00 Special Aswanerd $50.62
3014 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $151,000.00 Total Tax: $4,327.92
EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Lae Serb Deft Wry 0 0 Sale value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use arde: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew BuBt 1974 auk" Type: OFFICE
Finished Btdg. Sq. fL- 6,336.0 0 - e Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 57
TAXPN: 101186009001 Acm (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Property Owner. MARSHA H ELUNGSON Assessed Land Value: $8,700.00 NM Tax: $258.54
3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aseewent $19.66
Total Assessed Value: $8,700.00 Too Tax: $27820
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sob Data (n gr 0 0 Soft Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Led Use 0ulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bunk: Building Type:
Finial ed Bldg. $q. It.- Garage $q. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 58
TAXPN: 101685008101 Aces (too saes of Tax Paroal): 0.1
Property Owner MARSHA H EWNGSON Assessed L W Value: $12,000.00 NM Tax: $2.225.18
3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: WOW= $PWW Assessment $27.10
Total Assessed Value: $78,000.00 TOW Tax: 82,25228
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale DM (OryrI 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Oulde: SA
Bldg. Data: YwBuilt 1976 Building Type: OFFICE
Finial yd Bldg. $q. fL: 2,432-0 Q gs Sq. fL, 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 59
TAXPl1: 101686009= Acres (total saes of Tax Parcel): 0.0
Property Owner. MARSHA H ELUNGSON Assessed Land Value: $4.300.00 Not Tax: $127.46
3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessnent $9.82
Total Assessed Value: $4,300.00 Total Tax: $13728
EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last SW Daft (rrllyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Lard ties 0ulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Buft. Building TV":
Finished Bldg. Sq. IL: Garage $q. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 60
TAXPN: 101685004001 Acres (total seas of Tax Paroef): 0.1 -
Property Owner MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Mahn: $6,300.00 Not Tax: $338.78
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $18.74
3914 CEDARVALE DR Toed Assessed Value: $81300.00 Too Tax: $357.52
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Bale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bum: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL- amw 5411
BEDS: BATH:
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Coder Gyve Redevelopment Project Area A-11
t P
MAP ID: 61
TAXPN: 101 g50050p1 Acres (total scree of Tat Parcel): 0.1
Pl OW -y Owner: MARK S TSTE PAARANTO Assessed Land V": $8,700.00 Nat Tax: $355.66
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aseesanteni $18.60
3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $8,700.00 Total Tax: $37526
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 aab Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land use buds.: SA
Bldg. Data: Year BLOL Bu9ding Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: tiersge ft tt
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 62
TAXPN: 1018115008001 Acres (toed acres of Tax Parcel): 02
Property 0wim MARKS TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: $9.000.00 Not Tax: $300.84
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Auawn d $0.00
3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $9.000.00 Told Tax: $300.84
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Lad SW Dab ("Oft 0 0 $de Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yaw Built: Building Type:
Rd"" Bldg. $q. 1L_ as"I" ft k
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 63
TAXPN: 101890109000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Property Owner: MINNESOTAS CREDITt1N10N Assessed Lard Value: $3,000.00 NO Tax: $122.06
38W SIBLEY MEMORIAL NY" Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 BpeeW Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $3,000.00 Total Tat: $122.06
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Dab (rr4T): 0 0 Baal Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC LMW tin Heide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Buuc Building Type:
Finlat" Bag. $q. it ts.rage aq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 64
TAXPN: IOIND104M Acres (tote acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3
Property Owtm M INNESOTAS CREDMJNION Assessed Land Value: $6.300.00 Not Tax: 1255.90
3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aseesalrwrd $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $6.300.00 Total Tax: $255.90
EAGAN MN 55122 Lao Sob Dab (no* 0 0 aW Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Lard Use Wide: SA
Bldg. Data: VOW BURL bUlk" Type:
Finished Bag. as it_ tlarage Wit
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 65
TAXPN: 161890104001 Acres ttohd acres of Tax Paroel): 0.7
Progrty 0wmr MINNESOTAS CREDf1UNION Assessed Land Value: 572.800.00 Not Tax: $10.815.70
3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL Hwy Assessed Bldg. Value: $246.100.00 $peeld Aseesamani $0.00
TOW Assessed Value: $320,900.00 Total Tax: $10,815.70
EAGAN MN 55122 Loa Saw Dab (Neyr): 4 1995 gab Value: $274.204.00
Zoning: CSC WW Use Wide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw BUR: 1975 Building Type: BANK
FkVGW Bldg. Bq. It.: 9.720.0 WMage Sq. it: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 66
TAXPN: . 10$880001001 Acres (W W Bens of Tax Parcel): 1.3
P opoly Owns: JENSEN JENSEN & JENSEN PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $116,500.00 Nel Tax: $26.385.88
3840 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $598.500.00 Special AooesmrM $395.50
TOW Assessed Value: $715.000.00 Told Tax: $26,781.38
EAGAN MN 55122-1412 Last Sob Dab (Hvy* 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Wide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1974 sum" Type: RESTAURANT
Finial" Bag. $q, fL- 7.995.0 WMage Sq 1t 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
City of Fagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-12
/O/
MAP ID: 67
TAXPN: 101690101001 Acres (toed aces of Tax Parcel): 3.5
Property Olwrwr: CEDARVALE BOWL INC Assessed Land Value. 6288,700.00 Nel Tau: 630,455.46
3BB3 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 6531,300.00 Special Assessment 6802.80
Total Assessed Value: 6800,000.00 Total Tax: 631,258.26
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sals Dab (nVyr): 0 0 Bids Value: 60.00
Zoning: CSC LrW Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1979 Buadlng Type: BWLNGIILLEY
Finished Bldg. Sq. R.- 32,961.0 Garage Sq. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 4
MAP ID: 68 _
TAXPIN: 101690101000 Aces (total sass of Tax Parcel)- 02
Property Owner: ANA CORPORATION Assessed Land Value: 63,300.00 NO Tax: 697.38
3830 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 60.00 Special AsaeMlnart 60.00
Total Assessed Value: 63.300.00 TOW Tax: 697.38
EAGAN MN 55122-1412 Last Sae Deb (mfyr~ 0 0 Gab Value: 60.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Vow Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft_ Qrape Sq. It:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 69
TAXPN: 101690102001 Acre (total aces of Tax Psreel): 1.3
Property Owner: IMAD ANSARI Assessed Land Value: 598.700.00 Net Tax: 55.832.22
4365 CAPRICORN CT Assessed Bldg. Value: $94,300.00 Spa" Asesstnnni $519.90
Total Assessed Value: $193,000.OD Toed Tax: 66,352.12
EAGAN MN 551231850 Last Sae Dab (Wyr): 7 1993 Bas Value: 5150,OOD.00
Zoning: CSC Land the Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1978 building Type: CDNV STORE
Finished Bldg. Sq. H: 3,045.0 QW"s Sq. ft 0
BEDS: O BATH: 2
MAP ID: 70
TAXPN: 100190005004 Acres (toed aces of Tay Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner JR MEGA INC Assessed Led Value: 687200.00 Net Tax: 611,816.50
%GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: 6263,000.00 Spsdel Assessment 60.00
29W HAYES DRIVE Toed Assessed Value: 6350.200.00 Total Tax: 611,816.50
BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last Sae Dab (ontyr): 10 1988 SW Value: 6335.500.00
Zoning: CSC Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Bunt: 1972 Buildng Type: WHSE,STRG
FinMW Bldg. 111% f4 23.M.0 Garage ft tl: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 71
TAXPN: 100190006004 Aces (toed acres of Tau Parcel): 0.8
Property Owner JA MEGA INC Assessed Led Value: 667.900.00 Nat Taz 52.83722
%GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: $1.900.00 Special Aesessonant 60.00
2908 HAYES DRIVE Toed Assessed Value: 589,800.00 Total Tax: $2.83722
BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last See Deb (mfyr): 0 0 See Value- 60.00
Zoning: CSC Land the Quids: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: sWlmrg Type:
Firishsd Bldg. Sq. fL: drags Sq ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 72
TAXPN: 100190002004 Aces (toed ease of Tax Prot): 1.1
Property Owner. C B & R ENT Assessed Led Value: 692.400.00 Net Tax: 68.537.56
3810 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 6116,600.00 SpecW Awasenurrt 60.00
Toed Assessed Value: $209,000.00 Toed Tax: 68,537.56
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1412 Last Bob Data (nVyr): 0 0 See Value: 60.00
Zoning: CSC Led the Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew BuItL- 1964 building Type: WHSE STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 9,554.0 Garage Sq. ft: O
BEDS: 0 BATH: 5
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-13
looZ
t i
MAP ID: 73
TAXPN: 100190003004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner C B d R ENT Assessed Land Value: $85.900.00 Not Tax: $11277.10
3035 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $231,200.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $317.000.00 Total Tax: $11277.10
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1402 Lest Sale flab (nV r): 0 0 SW Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use GuWe: SA
Bldg. Date: YewBullt: 1972 Building Type; WKSF-STRG
Finished Bidg. Sq. ft.- ts,s99.0 Garage Sq n 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 74
TAXPN: 100190001004 Acres (total acres of Tax Pla Y 0.7
Property Ownw HANNA 6 KATHLEEN NASR Assessed Land Value: $103.100.00 WIT= $4.659.54
% EXPRESS DONUTS Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,900.00 Special Assessment $44544
3008 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Total Assessed Value: $155,000.00 Total Tax: $5,105.38
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1412 LM Sale Dab (a** 6 1988 SW Value: $175,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Date: Yew awn: 1972 Building Type: RESTAURANT
Finialed Bldg. Sq. ft-- 1.453.0 Garage Sp. ft 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 80
TAXPN: 104445001001 Acres (total memo of Tax Plc 0.4
Property Owner CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Wed Value: $29.400.00 Not Tax: $1.324.56
3BW PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $113,000.00 SpeeW Aooesst ent $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $142,400.00 Total Tax: $1,324.56
EAGAN MN 65122 Last Sale flab (mVyr): 11 2000 llele Value: $145,000.00
Zoning: R-1 Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Date: Year Built' 1958 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Rrdo" Bldg. Sq. ft: 2,00D.0 Gangs Sq. It- 0
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
MAP ID: 81
TAXPN: 104445002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Pwoal) 0.4
ProPwtY Owner. ALBERT 5 ALMA BIRR Assessed Land Value: $32,100.00 NOT= $1,289.30
1930 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $95,900.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $128,000.00 TotalTax: $1289.30
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last Sale Dab (n**: 0 0 SW Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-1 Wed Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Bwn: 1962 ou"ng Type: S.FAM.RES
FirYttled Bldg. Sq. ft: 1,248.0 Garage Sq. ft 1216
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 82
TAXPN: 104445003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Pwoal) 0.4
Property Owner JEFFREY G 6 MARY M HALL Assessed Land Value: $33,800.00 Net Tax: $1.159.40
1940 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $89,300.0$1 Special Aesesamerd $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $123,100.00 Total Tax: $1,159.40
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last SW Dab (mlyr): 5 1967 Sale Value: $70,000.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Date: Yew Bwn: 1952 Budding T"w: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1.428.0 Gangs Sq. ft: 672
BEDS: 4 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 83
TAXPN: 104446004001 Acres (tool saes of Tax PwcsQ. 0.5
Property Owner. THOMAS G i JULIE A WOOONER Assessed L=W Value: $33,800.00 NO Tax: $1.528.42
3016 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $113.000.00 Special As9esemont $159.02
Total Assessed Value: $146,800.00 Total Tax: $11685.44
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1401 Lest SW Dab (rntyr): 4 1991 Sale Value: $85.000.00
Zoning: R•1 Land Lim Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yw Buln: 1958 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finial Bldg. Sq. ft- 1.184.0 GWage Sq ft 0
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for flee Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-14
/D,3
MAP ID: 84
TAXPN: 104445006101 Acres (total sates of Tat Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner: TONG YIA 6 ILIA VANG LOR Assessed Laid Value: $32,100.00 Net Tat: $1,156.72
3= BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $64.500.00 Special Aaesamerd $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $116.600.00 Toth Tat: $1,156.72
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1401 Leer Sale Daft (rNy►): a 1990 sale Value. $8D.900.00
Zoning: R-1 Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: TwaWIL, 19W BuftngT"n: s.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. $q. 1L: 1.661.0 Gangs Sq. ft- 464
BEDS: 3 BATH: 125
MAP ID: 85
TAXPN: 10446006201 Acres (toed acres of Tat Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner: ALBERT E HORROCKS Assessed Land Value: $30.500.00 Net Tat: $464.74
PO BOX 157 Assessed skip. Value: WOO OO SpecW Aaseasrnanll $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $30,500.00 Total Tat: $464.74
CLARKS GROVE MN SW16-0157 Last Sale Data (miyry 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-1 Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: VwBulfc Building TV"-
Finished sag. 84 ft.: Grog. Sq. ft-
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 86
TAXPN: 10"45009001 Acres (tool acres of Tat Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner DORIS R TSTE D RUNE Assessed Lad Value: $33.000.00 NH Tat: $1,951.16
3630 ALDER LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $135,700.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $169,500.00 Total Ts= $1,951.16
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1501 Last SW Deb (Rlfyr): 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew suit 1961 Building Type: &FAM.RIES
Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: 2,484.0 Gerape Sq. ft 440
BEDS: 4 BATH: 225
MAP ID: 87
TAXPN: 10445010101 Acres (WW acres of Tax ParoNp 0.5
Property Owner REM METRO SERVICES INC Assessed Land Value: $35.600.00 NN Tax: $2,506.36
8921 YORK AVE S Assessed Bldg. Value: $130,500.00 Special Ateaaanleni $0.00
Toed Assessed Value: $166,100.00 Total Tat: $2,506.36
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435-2587 Last Sab Deis (nWW: 7 1993 tied Value: $120,000.00
Zoning: R• 1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Tow Bunk: 1900 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
FiniMled Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,824.0 Oerege Sq. fe 962
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
MAP ID: 88
TAXPN: 104730001001 Acres (bW acres of Tat Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner DAKOTA COUNTY HRA Assessed two Value: $24,000.00 Net Tax: $0.00
2496145TH ST W Assessed Bldg. Value: $180.200.00 Special Aa nwmd $0.00
Toed Assessed Value: $184200.00 Total Ta: $0.00
ROSEMOILNT MN 55068.4947 Last Sob Daft (IlVwY 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: R•2 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Vow Built 1977 SuNdng Type: TWIN HOME
FinsW Bldg. So, ft.: 1,136.0 'n 9 rae ft fe 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
Bldg. Data: Vow Bu9t: 1977 BuildingTyps: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. 5% tl.: 1,136.0 Gsrap Sq. tt: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 89
TAXPN: 104730002001 Acres (IoW acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property t)w m JAMES A NUEY Assessed Land Value: $40.800.00 Net Tax: $2.581.90
1993 GOLD TRAIL Assessed Bldg. Value: $154,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Toed Assessed Value: $195.400.00 Toed Ta: $2,581.911
EAGAN MN 55122-1589 Last Sale Dab (mfyr): 6 1999 Bob Value: $135.000.00
Toning: R-2 Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Tow Built 1977 Building Type: TWIN NOME
Finalled Bldg. Sq. ft- 1.1720 flange fiq.1C 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
Bldg. Data: Yw buft 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished aldg. Sq. ft: 1.1720 Garage $q ft: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 -
City of Eagan. Minnesota Redevelopment PLn for the Cedar Grove Redevelopmatt Project Area A-15
I p
MAP ID: 90
TAXPN: 104730003001 Apes (lotal acne of Tax Parcel): 0.6
Property Owner. RONALD D CASPER Assessed Land Value: $40,800.00 Not Tax: $1,671.82
1989 GOLD TR Assessed Bldg. Valve: $150.600.00 Special Asaeanent $0.00
Total Assessed Vahrw $191,200.00 Total Tax: $1,671.82
EAGAN MN 55122-15% Last SW Dole (mty* 6 $998 Sae Vahr: $148.000.00
Zoning: R-2 Land Use Gulde: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finehed Bldg. Sq. It.: 1.156.0 Grage 541L• 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. fl: 1.156.0 Grays sq. fC 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 91
TAXPN: 100190002009 Acres (toed aces d Tax Pmreel): 2.4
Pnprty Owner CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Valves $15.11W.00 !nit Tax: $0.00
3795 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg VNur. $0.00 Special Aeeesrrlent $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $15,800.00 Total Tax: $0.00
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1318 Lest SW Do" (ftv* 0 0 sae Valut-. $0.00
Zoning: P LrW Use Guide: P
Bldg. Data: Yew Buft Did" Type:
Finished Olds. Sq. ft.: Gantge Sari:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 92
TAXPN: 1011110007001 Apes (total apms of Talc Parcel: 0.8
Property Owner: DARYL J i NORI A HART Assessed LAW Value- $54,900.00 Not Tax: $1,612.42
3850 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Vmiw: $97,900.00 Special Aseeesnrnt $0.00
Toed Assessed Vskm- $152.800.00 Total Tax: $1,612.42
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Lao Sae Dab (ftV* 10 1994 Sob Value: $100.000.00
Zoning: R11 Land Use rookie: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Buft. 1934 Building Type: S.FAWRES
Finished Bldg. sq. III.: 1.440.D Garage ft III:- 938
BEDS: 1 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 93
TAXPN: 1041,1170001000 Apes (total mans of Tax Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner. TERRY E TSTE STOVER Assessed Land Value. $47,800.00 Net Tim $1,243.46
3906 RAHN RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aaeesmmneni $62322
Total Assessed Value: $47.800.00 Total Tax: $1,866.68
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1523 Lest sae Dote ("Oft 0 0 Sae Vahw: $0.00
Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: Building Type:
Finialnd Bldg. 6% R: Orrgs Sq.1C
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 95
TAXPN: 100170002054 Acre (toW apes of Tax Prat: 12
►roperty Owrm FRANCHISE REALTY NT CORP Assessed Land Value: $189.400.00 NO Tax: $16.419.34
THOMAS P BUTLER Assessed Bldg. Value: $275,800.00 Special Asetwneni SO.DO
7735 GIBRALTAR TERR Total Assessed Value. $465,000.00 Total Tax: $16,419.34
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124.6124 Lao Sale Dow (ftv* 0 0 Sae Valet: $0.00
Z N ft: GB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1974 Building Type: REST FSTFD
Finiifltd Bldg Sq. V-: 4,564.0 Grape ft it: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 96
TAXPN: 10111110001001 Acns (toed apse d Tax Pmn:el): 6.5
Proprly Owner CHASKA INV LTD P NSHP Assessed LAW Vmare $582.000.00 No Tax: 537,362.96
7301 OHMS LANE Assessed Bldg. Value.. $413.000.00 Special Aseomm t $0.00
SUITE 390 Total Assessed Value: $1,005,000.00 TOW Tax: $37,362.96
EDINA MN $5439-2351 too Sae Dab (nVy* 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00
Zoning: NS Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Buiil: 1979 Building Type: SHPCTR NBH
Finished Bldg. ft fL: 39.920.0 Garage 114 ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 13
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Dove Redevelopment Project Area A-16
.
lay-
MAP ID: 97
TAXPN: 1016115011101 Atxse (total Sens Of Tax ParoN): 0.0
Property Owner MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value. $1,100.00 NotTax. $3228
3900 CEDARVALE OR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assesartsrd $2.66
Total Assessed Value: $1,100.00 Total Tax: $34.94
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Soft Dab (nVy* 0 0 sate Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: YwBuilt: BuildingTyps:
Finistrd Bldg. Sw f1.: Garage ft ft
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 98
TAXPN: 1061120001000 Acre (total acme at Tax Paroel): 0.0
Property owner: DUM REALTY LTD PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $100.00 Not Tax: $3.62
% ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 special Assesenrnt $0.00
1550 UTICA AVE S. SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $100.00 Total Tax: $3.62
ST LOUIS PARK AAN 55416 Last sale Dab (no* 0 0 SW Value. $0.00
Zoning: PD LOW Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew9WI : au"ngType:
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL• Garage ft it
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 99
TAXPN: 106820001001 Acres (total acres of Tax POplj: 16.6
Property Owner. DUKE REALTY LTD PTNSHP Assessed LOW Value: $1.265,300.00 Net Tax: 5306,18720
% ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $6,639,700.00 Spa" Assessnwd $12.074.84
1550 UTICA AVE S SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $7,905,000.00 TOWS Tax: $318.262.01
ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Last Soft Dab (mly* O 0 sate Value. $0.00
Zoning: PD LOW Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 19911 Building Type: WHSE STRG
Finished Bldg. ft fL- 235,00D.0 Garage ft ft' 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: a
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Totals
Total Area (acres.): 164.1
Total Finished Bldg. 910,984.00
City of Eagan, Minnesota Rodevclopnwnt Plan for ttheCoder Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-17
~ i
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area
Parcels or Portions of Parcels in Right-of-way
Taxpin Right-of-way Owner name Parcel Acreage
100190001025 SHELDON & MARY RAMNARINE 0.066
100190001102 BERNARD J MULCAHYCO INC 0.585
100190002004 C B & R ENT 0.052
100190003004 C B & R ENT 0283
100190006004 JR MEGA INC 0.121
100190001106 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.028
100190001006 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.296
100190002009 CITY OF EAGAN 0.219
100190002026 STATE OF MN 3.365
100190001426 STATE OF MN 1.221
100190005106 WAYZATA BAY CTR CO 0.645
100190001226 CITY OF EAGAN 1.096
100190001111 LEO MOGOL 0.332
100190001008 SINCLAIR MARKETING INC 0.131
100190001211 LEO MOGOL 0.114
100190002007 STEVE J & JANE M MARTIN 0.123
100190004008 ROCKY L RANCH 0.064
100190005008 JEFFREY D & SARAH J SCHENDEL 0.045
100190001107 JOHN W FTIZGERALD 0.078
100190004112 JOOS ELECTRIC CO 0.119
100190008008 JOSEPH R MILBAUER 0.449
100190008006 JOHN E & KATHLEEN LUNDEEN 0.238
100190004212 JOHN R LACHENMAYER 0.065
100190003012 HANSEN METCALF ENT 0.091
100190002012 GORDON & ALICE KOPACEK 0.098
100190007008 BTA INV 0.39
100190002027 STATE OF MN 1.303
100190009008 JEFFREY SCHENDEL 0.182
100190010008 WING K SETO 0.673
100190001027 STATE OF MN 1.46
City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Ama A-18
/6).
As of September 26, 2001
Draft for City Council Review
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
for the establishment of
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
(a redevelopment district)
within
THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
CITY OF EAGAN
STATE OF MINNESOTA
Public Hearing: October 2, 2001
Adopted:
EHLERS Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105
i A S S O C I A T E S I N C 651-697-8500 fax: 651-697-8555 www.ehiers-inc.com
0
1 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(for reference purposes only)
SECTION II
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 2-1
Subsection 2-1. Foreword 2-1
Subsection 2-2. Statutory Authority 2-1
Subsection 2-3. Statement of Objectives 2-1
Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview 2-1
Subsection 2-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired . 2-2
Subsection 2-6. Classification of the District 2-3
Subsection 2-7. Duration of the District 2-5
Subsection 2-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured
Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements 2-5
Subsection 2-9. Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness 2-6
Subsection 2-10. Uses of Funds 2-7
Subsection 2-11. Fiscal Disparities Election 2-8
Subsection 2-12. Business Subsidies 2-8
Subsection 2-13. County Road Costs 2-9
Subsection 2-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 2-9
Subsection 2-15. Supporting Documentation 2-10
Subsection 2-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues 2-10
Subsection 2-17. Modifications to the District 2-10
Subsection 2-18. Administrative Expenses 2-11
Subsection 2-19. Limitation of Increment 2-11
Subsection 2-20. Use of Tax Increment 2-12
Subsection 2-21. Excess Tax Increments 2-13
Subsection 2-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer 2-13
Subsection 2-23. Assessment Agreements 2-13
Subsection 2-24. Administration of the District 2-14
Subsection 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements 2-14
Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations 2-14
Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment 2-14
Subsection 2-28. Summary 2-15
APPENDIX A - PROJECT DESCRIPTION A-1
APPENDIX B - MAPS OF THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA
AND THE DISTRICT B-2
APPENDIX C - DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT C-1
APPENDIX D - ESTIMATED CASH FLOW FOR THE DISTRICT D-1
APPENDIX E - MINNESOTA BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FORM E-1
APPENDIX F - REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT F-1
APPENDIX G - BUT/FOR QUALIFICATIONS G-1
A~F
SECTION II
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
Subsection 2-1. Foreword
The Eagan Economic Development Authority (the "EDA"), the City of Eagan (the "City"), staff and
consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of Tax Increment
Financing District No. I ("the District"), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in the
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area.
Subsection 2-2. Statutory Authority
Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or
redevelopment to occur. To this end, the EDA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes ("M.S. 469.090 through 469.1081, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 through
469.179, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing
public costs related to this project.
This Section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District
No. 1. Other relevant information is contained in the Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove
Redevelopment Area.
Subsection 2-3. Statement of Objectives
The District currently consists of 92 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. The District
is being created to facilitate a mixed-use redevelopment incorporating owner-occupied and rental housing,
retail and commercial development, and transit features in the City of Eagan. Contracts for this have not
been entered into at the time of preparation of this Plan, but the date when development is likely to occur is
Fall 2001. This Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for
the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area.
The activities contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan and the Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other
qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of
the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area and the District. The Cedar Grove Redevelopment Plan is on file at
the Eagan City Hall.
Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview
1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by
the EDA or City and is further described in this Plan.
2. Relocation - Relocation services,- to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to
M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws.
3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary
legal requirements, the EDA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that they
may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer.
4. The EDA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition,
Eagan Economic Development Authority 'tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 2-1
D
i l
construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public streets work within the
District.
Subsection 2-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired
The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way identified by the parcels listed in Appendix
C. See the map in Appendix B for further information on the location of the District.
Parcel Numbers
106806003200 100190004212 101690103000
106806002000 100190001211 101690104001
106806004001 100190001008 103880001001
106806005001 100190009008 101690101001
101960001001 100190002008 101690101000
100190001102 100190003008 101690102001
107550001001 100190007008 100190005004
107550001000 100190004008 100190006004
100190002025* 100190005008 100190002004
100190003025* 100190008008 100190003004
101370007001 100190002007 100190001004
101370006001 100190008006 104445001001
101370005001 100190001107 104445002001
101370004001 100190005106 104445003001
101370003001 100190001006 104445004001
101370002001 100190001106 104445006101
101370001001 100190007106 104445006201
100190001003 100190007206 104445009001
101670204108 100190007306 104445010101
101670203108 100190007406 104730001001
101670202008 101685012201 104730002001
101670201008 101685012301 104730003001
100190010008 101685003101 100190002009
101352001000 101685009001 104480001001
101352001001 101685008101 108470001000
101352002001 101685008201 100170002054
100190002012 101685004001 106810001001
100190003012 101685005001 101685011101
101670201000 101685006001 106820001000
100190001111 101690104000 106820001001
100190004112
* The City has proposed that parcel numbers 100190002025 and 100190003025 be combined prior to
certification of the District, no later than June 30, 2002. If the lot combination does not take place prior
to that date, parcel number 100190003025 will be eliminated from the District.
z-2
The District will also include the following right-of-way parcels:
100190001025 100190005106 100190008008
100190001102 100190001226 100190008006
100190002004 100190001111 100190004212
100190003004 100190001008 100190003012
100190006004 100190001211 100190002012
100190001106 100190002007 100190007008
100190001006 100190004008 100190002027
100190002009 100190005008 100190009008
100190002026 100190001107
100190010008
100190001426 100190004112
100190001027
The EDA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights
of way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the EDA or City only in order to
accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public
streets, utilities and facilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or
development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The EDA or City may acquire
property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the
objectives of this Plan. Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to
finance the acquisition and related costs.
Subsection 2-6. Classification of the District
The EDA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with
M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended, inclusive, find that the District, to be established, is a
redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) as defined below:
(a) 'Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project,
or portions of a project, within which the authorityfinds by resolution that one or more of the
following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists:
(1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent
of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree
requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or
(2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently
used rail yards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way; or
(3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as
defined in Section 115C, Subd. 15, if the tank facility:
(i) have or had a capacity of more than one million gallons;
(ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; or
(iii) have been removed, or are unused, underused, inappropriately used or infrequently
used..
2-3
~ 1
(b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in
structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and
ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition ofinteriorpartitions,
or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify
substantial renovation or clearance.
(c) A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable
to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15
percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the
site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard
under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size,
type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or
other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without
an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal
prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the
property is not required, if the municipalityfinds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable
to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that
owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion
that the building is structurally substandard.
(d) A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the
finding under paragraph (a) if all of the following conditions are met:
(1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the
request for certification of the parcel as pan of the district with the county auditor;
(2) the substandard building was demolished or removed by the authority or the demolition or
removal was financed by the authority or was done by a developer under a development
agreement with the authority;
(3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was
occupied by a structurally substandard building and that afterdemolition and clearance the
authority intended to include the parcel within a district; and
(4) upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district,
the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be
adjusted as provided by § 469.177, subdivision 1, paragraph (h).
(e) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved
or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel
contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures.
(fl For districts consisting of two or more noncontiguous areas, each area must qualify as a
redevelopment district under paragraph (a) to be included in the district, and the entire area of
the district must satisfy paragraph (a).
In meeting the statutory criteria the EDA and City will rely on the following facts and findings:
❑ The District is a redevelopment district consisting of 92 parcels.
113 2-d
0 An inventory showing that parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the District are occupied by
buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures will be completed
prior to approval by the City.
o An inspection of the buildings located within the District finding that more than 50 percent of the
buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act will be completed prior to approval by
the City (See Appendix F).
Pursuant to 469.176 Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under
the provisions of Section 273.111 or 273.112 of Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar
years before the filing of the request for certification of the District.
Subsection 2-7. Duration of the District
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration of the District must
be indicated within the Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. Ib, the duration of the District will
be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the EDA or City (a total of 26 years). The date of receipt
by the City of the first tax increment is expected to be 2003. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including
any modifications of the Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2028, or when
the Plan is satisfied.
Subsection 2-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity
Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. land M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity
(ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor
in 2001 for taxes payable 2002.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning
in the payment year 2002) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of:
1. change in tax exempt status of property;
2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district;
3. change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements;
4. change in the use of the property and classification;
5. change in state law governing class rates; or
6. change in connection with previously issued building permits.
In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value
will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the EDA or City.
The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2002, assuming the
request for certification is made before June 30, 2002. The Original Tax Capacity and the Original Local
Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated
Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, upon
completion of the project, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below.
The EDA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its
obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2003. The project tax capacity listed
is an estimate of values when the project is completed.
2-5
~ 1
PrQJe t Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion $ 2,916,000
(PTQ
Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity(ONTC) $ 6187822
Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) $ 2,297,179
Original Local Tax Rate 0.96578
Estimated Annual Tax Increment(CTC x Local Tax $2,218,570
Rate)
Percent Retained by the EDA 100%
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the EDA shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its
request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S.,
Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which
building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the
Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the
original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit
was issued.
The EDA is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have
been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the Plan by the City.
Subsection 2-9. Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness
Public improvement costs, acquisition, relocation, utilities, parking facilities, streets and sidewalks, and site
preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual
collection of tax increments. The EDA or City reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally ap-
plicable to the EDA or City and the Plan, including, but not limited to, special assessments, general property
taxes, state aid for road maintenance and construction, proceeds from the sale of land, other contributions
from the developer and investment income, to pay for the estimated public costs.
The EDA or City reserves the right to incur bonded indebtedness or other indebtedness as a result of the Plan.
As presently proposed, the project will be financed by a pay-as-you-go note. Additional indebtedness may
be required to finance other authorized activities. The total principal amount of bonded indebtedness or other
indebtedness related to the use of tax increment financing will not exceed $33,230,000 without a
modification to the Plan pursuant to applicable statutory requirements.
This provision does not obligate the EDA or City to incur debt. The EDA or City will issue bonds or incur
other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The EDA or City
may also finance the activities to be undertaken pursuant to the Plan through loans from funds of the EDA
or City or to reimburse the developer on a "pay-as-you-go" basis for eligible costs paid for by a developer.
The estimated sources of funds for the District are contained in the table below.
//So" 2-6
SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL
Tax Increment $51,500,000
Local Contribution $0
PROJECT REVENUES $51,500,000
Subsection 2-10. Uses of Funds
Currently under consideration for the District is a significant redevelopment effort of the City of Eagan. The
project cost is estimated to be $200 million to $250 million. The project is focused on replacing a market
obsolete regional shopping center, providing new life cycle housing options for existing Eagan residents,
enhancing the public transit framework and correcting a number of traffic problems with the project area.
Redevelopment will be guided by a 1999 community planning study "Village Plaza - A Redevelopment
Concept for the Cedar/l3 Area." and a subsequent concept refinement accepted by the EDA.
The redevelopment is expected to occur in stages over the next two to seven years. The City has received
development proposals for approximately 80% of the redevelopment area from several different developers.
Proposed developed may potentially include 600,000 square feet of office, 300,000 square feet of office
showroom, 120,000 square feet of retail, 200 hotel units, 350 for sale houses, and 950 multi-family (including
senior) housing units. Public improvements including upgrade of Silver Bell Road - Cedarvale Boulevard
intersection, relocation of Cedarvale Boulevard, modifications to Beau d' Rue Drive, modifications to
existing buildings, storm water control, landscaping and other related improvements will also be part of
project costs.
The EDA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project for certain
costs. The EDA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around
the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this Plan
authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate
of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table.
USES OF FUNDS TOTAL
Land/Building Acquisition $14,650,000
Site Improvements/Preparation $6,100,000
Public Utilities $2,440,000
Parking Facilities $2,440,000
Building Renovation $1,900,000
Streets and Sidewalks $5,700,000
Interest $13,130,000
Administrative Costs (up to 10%) $5,140,000
PROJECT COSTS TOTAL $51,500,000
Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification
to this Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without
formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S.,
Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of the tax increment paid by property within the District
L 2-7
~ 1
will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the
boundaries of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered
to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this Plan.
The City intends to expend 15 percent of the increment to create a Business Renovation Fund. This Fund will
assist businesses which were identified in the planning process as those to remain in the District. The Fund
is intended to provide financial assistance to these businesses and prevent the future deterioration of the area
in the District.
Subsection 2-11. Fiscal Disparities Election
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the EDA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal
disparities. If the calculations pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause a, (outside the District) are
followed, the following method of computation shall apply:
(1) The original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the
application of the fiscal disparity provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. Where the original net
tax capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured net tax
capacity and no tax increment determination. Where the original net tax capacity is less than
the current net tax capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current
net tax capacity is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which
the authority has designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing
districts is the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority.
(2) The count? auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authorityfrom the
net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The
local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity
of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated
by the extension of the lesser of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local
tax rate to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the
authority.
The EDA or City shall submit to the County Auditor at the time of the request for certification which method
of computation of fiscal disparities the EDA or City elected.
The EDA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause a.
According to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3:
(c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or
(b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may
elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in
paragraph (b).
Subsection 2-12. Business Subsidies
To the extent applicable, the EDA or City agrees to comply with M.S., Section 116J.993 to 116J.994, which
states that a local unit of government granting financial assistance to a business for economic development
or job growth purposes, including tax increment financing, must establish business subsidy criteria and
approve a business subsidy agreement with the business receiving the assistance. (See Appendix E).
2-8
Subsection 2-13. County Road Costs
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. la, the county board may require the EDA or City to pay for all or
part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment
will, in the judgement of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of
road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five
years under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan.
In the opinion of the EDA and City and consultants, the proposed development outlined in this Plan will have
little or no impact upon county roads. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must
notify the EDA or City within forty-five days of receipt of this Plan.
Subsection 2-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions
The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the Plan
would occur without the creation of the District. However, the EDA or City has determined that such
development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the
fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0.
The table below illustrates the estimated fiscal impact of the District if the "but for" test was not met under
the current property tax system. These numbers represent the best available information. It must be noted
that the actual impacts would be based on lower Total Net Tax Capacity values and different Tax Extension
Rates as a result of changes enacted by the State Legislature.
IMPACT ON TAX BASE
2000/2001 Estimated Captured
Total Net Tax Capacity (CTC) Percent of CTC
Tax Capacity Upon Completion to Entity Total
Dakota County 281,837,297 2,297,179 0.8151%
City of Eagan 81,011,004 2,297,179 2.8356%
ISD No. 191 53,135,427 2,297,179 4.3233%
IMPACT ON TAX RATES
200012001 Percent Potential
Extension Rates of Total CTC Taxes
Dakota County 0.253200 26.22% 2,297,179 581,646
City of Eagan 0.234410 24.27% 2,297,179 538,482
ISD No. 191 0.450950 46.69% 2,297,179 1,035,913
Other: 0.027220 2.82% 2,297,179 62,529
Total 0.965780 100.00% 2,156,040
The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate
used for calculations is the 2001/Pay 2002 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based
on Pay 2001 figures. The District will be certified under the actual 2001/Pay 2002 rates, which were
unavailable at the time this Plan was prepared.
2-9
llt?000, 1 1
Subsection 2-15. Supporting Documentation
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd la, clause 7 the Plan must contain identification and description of
studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175 Subd 3, clause (2).
Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the authority's findings:
Subsection 2-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing
district include all of the following potential revenue sources:
1. taxes paid by the captured net tax capacity, but excluding any excess taxes, as computed underM.S.,
Section 469.177;
2. the proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, purchased by the authority
with tax increments;
3. repayments of loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments; and
4. interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments.
Subsection 2-17. Modifications to the District
In accordance with M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any:
1. reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the
District;
2. increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize
interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease
the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized;
3. increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the EDA or City;
4. increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures; or
5. designation of additional property to be acquired by the EDA or City,
shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval
of the original Plan.
Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 4(b), the geographic area of the District may be reduced, but shall
not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the
county auditor. If a redevelopment district is enlarged, the reasons and supporting facts for the determination
that the addition to the district meets the criteria of M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10, paragraph (a), clauses
(1) to (5), must be documented in writing and retained. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply if
(1) the only modification is elimination of parcel(s) from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the
District and (2) (A) the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District equals or exceeds
the net tax capacity of those parcel(s) in the District's original net tax capacity or (B) the EDA agrees that,
notwithstanding M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than
the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District.
The EDA or City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic
area of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the District. Modifications to the District in the form of a
budget modification or an expansion of the boundaries will be recorded in the Plan.
/ 2-10
Subsection 2-18. Administrative Expenses
In accordance with M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 14, and M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative
expenses means all expenditures of the EDA or City, other than:
1. amounts paid for the purchase of land;
2. amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and
engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the
project;
3. relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the
project; or
4. amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued
pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or
5. amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance
costs described in sections 1 to 3.
For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982,
administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants,
and planning or economic development consultants. Tax increment may be used to pay any authorized and
documented administrative expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total tax
increment expenditures authorized by the Plan or the total tax increments from the District, whichever is less.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the county's actual
administrative expenses incurred in connection with the District. The county may require payment of those
expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the county treasurer shall deduct an amount equal to 0.25
percent of any increment distributed to the EDA or City and the county treasurer shall pay the amount
deducted to the state treasurer for deposit in the state general fund to be appropriated to the State Auditor
for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information and the cost of examining and
auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing.
Subsection 2-19. Limitation of Increment
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. ]a, no tax increment shall be paid to the EDA or City for the
District after three (3) years from the date of certification of the Original Net Tax Capacity value of the
taxable property in the District by the County Auditor unless within the three (3) year period:
(a) bonds have been issued in aid of the project containing the district pursuant to M.S., Section
469.178, or any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.152
to 469.165, or
(b) the EDA or City has acquired property within the District, or
(c) the EDA or City has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within
the District.
The bonds must be issued, or the EDA or City must acquire property or construct or cause public
improvements to be constructed by approximately August, 2004 and report such actions to the County
Auditor.
2-11
02
1 r
The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District
may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other
escrow account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity
or redemption date.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 6:
if, after four years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax increment
financing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of
property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel
but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a
parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the
parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be
taken from that parcel and the original net tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the
original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the
parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation
on that parcel including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance
with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor that the
activity has commenced and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most
recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity of the
tax increment financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this subdivision.
The authority must submit to the county auditor evidence that the required activity, has taken place
for each parcel in the district. The evidence for a parcel must be submitted by February 1 of the fifth
year following the year in which the parcel was certified as included in the district. For purposes
of this subdivision, qualified improvements of a street are limited to (1) construction or opening of
a new street, (2) relocation of a street, and(3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing
street.
The EDA or City or a property owner must improve parcels within the District by approximately August,
2005 and report such actions to the County Auditor.
Subsection 2-20. Use of Tax Increment
The EDA or City hereby determines that it will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable
property located in the District for the following purposes:
I . to pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a project;
2. to finance, or otherwise pay the cost of redevelopment of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project
Area pursuant to the M.S., Sections 469.090 to 469.1081;
3. to pay for project costs as identified in the budget set forth in the Plan;
4. to finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4;
5. to pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf the EDA
or City or for the benefit of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area by a developer;
6. to finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing
the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the Plan or pursuant to M.S.,
Chapter 462C. M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178; and
7. to accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on
the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Chapter 4620, M.S., Sections 469.152
through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178.
2-12
These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other
purposes prohibited by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4.
Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by to the EDA for the Tax Increment Fund of said
District. The EDA or City will pay to the developer(s) annually an amount not to exceed an amount as
specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public improvements,
demolition and relocation, site preparation, and administration. Remaining increment funds will be used for
EDA or City administration (up to 10 percent) and the costs of public improvement activities outside the
District.
Subsection 2-21. Excess Tax Increments
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount
necessary to pay the costs authorized by the Plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as
provided in M.S., Section 475.61, Subd. 3, the EDA or City shall use the excess amount to do any of the
following:
1. prepay any outstanding bonds;
2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor;
3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bonds; or
4. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in
proportion to their local tax rates.
In addition, the EDA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to modify the Plan in
order to finance additional public costs in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the District.
Subsection 2-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer
The EDA or City will review any proposal for private development to determine its conformance with the
Redevelopment Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the
following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and
electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any
other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the EDA or City to demonstrate the conformance of the
development with City plans and ordinances. The EDA or City may also use the Agreements to address other
issues related to the development.
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. S, no more than 25 percent, by acreage, of the property to be
acquired in the District as set forth in the Plan shall at any time be owned by the EDA or City as a result of
acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments
from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 25 percent of the acreage, the EDA
or City concluded an agreement for the development or redevelopment of the property acquired and which
provides recourse for the EDA or City should the development or redevelopment not be completed.
Subsection 2-23. Assessment Agreements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the EDA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement
in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market
value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement
shall be presented to the assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be
constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to
be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears,
2-13
l t
in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor shall also certify the minimum
market value agreement.
Subsection 2-24. Administration of the District
Administration of the District will be handled by the Assistant City Administrator.
Subsection 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements
Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5, 6 and 6a the EDA or City must undertake financial reporting for
all tax increment financing districts to the Office of the State Auditor, County Board, County Auditor and
School Board on or before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5 also provides that an
annual statement shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on or before August 15.
If the City fails to make a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S. Section
469.175 Subd. 5 and Subd. 6, the Office of the State Auditor will direct the County Auditor to withhold the
distribution of tax increment from the District.
Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations
As required by the Tax Increment Financing Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been
made that the anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private
investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could
reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase
in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of
the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Plan. In making said
determination, reliance has been placed upon written representatives made by the developer to such effects
and upon EDA and City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site. A comparative
analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax
increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix
D, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated
subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the District and the
use of tax increments.
Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment
1. General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax increment shall be used in accordance with the Plan.
The revenues shall be used to finance, or otherwise pay the cost of redevelopment of the Cedar Grove
Redevelopment Area pursuant to the M.S., Sections 469.090 to 469.1081. These revenues shall not be
used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No revenues derived from tax increment shall be used for the
acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and
regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit
of government or the state or federal government or for a commons area used as a public park, or a
facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This provision shall not prohibit the use
of revenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of
a privately owned facility for conference purposes.
2. Pooling Limitations. At least 75 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on
activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance
activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not
more than 25 percent of said tax increments may be expended, through a development fund or otherwise,
2-14
402112
on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced
bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they
were solely for activities outside of the District.
The City intends to expend 10 percent of the increment on administrative expenses and to expend 15
percent of the increment to create a business assistance fund, which will assist businesses locating in the
community.
3. Five Year Limitation on Commitment of Tax Increments. Tax increments derived from the District shall
be deemed to have satisfied the 75 percent test set forth in paragraph (2) above only if the five year rule
set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 3, has been satisfied; and beginning with the sixth year
following certification of the District, 75 percent of said tax increments that remain after expenditures
permitted under said five year rule must be used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit
enhanced bonds as more fully set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 5.
4. Redevelopment District. At least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increment from a
redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation
of redevelopment and renewal and renovation districts underM.S., Section 469.176 Subd. 4j. These costs
include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or
improvements orhazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary
to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures,
clearing of the land, the removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary for development of
the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated
administrative expenses of the EDA or City, including the cost of preparation of the development action
response plan, may be included in the qualifying costs.
Subsection 2-28. Summary
The Eagan Economic Development Authority is establishing the District to preserve and enhance the tax
base, redevelop substandard areas, and provide employment opportunities in the City. The Tax Increment
Financing Plan for the District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive,
Roseville, Minnesota 55113, telephone (651) 697-8500.
z-ts
r
APPENDIX A
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Cedar Grove Tax Increment District is a significant redevelopment effort of the City of Eagan. The total
development cost is estimated to be $200 million to $250 million. The project is focused on replacing a
market obsolete regional shopping center, providing new life cycle housing options for existing Eagan
residents, enhancing the public transit framework and correcting a number of traffic problems with the
project area. Redevelopment will be guided by a 1999 community planning study "Village Plaza - A
Redevelopment Concept for the Cedar/13 Area" and a subsequent concept refinement accepted by the EDA.
The redevelopment is expected to occur in stages over the next two to seven years. The City has received
development proposals for approximately 80% of the redevelopment area from several different developers.
Proposed developed may potentially include 600,000 square feet of office, 300,000 square feet of office
showroom, 120,000 square feet of retail, 200 hotel units, 350 for sale houses, and 950 multi-family (including
senior) housing units. Public improvements including upgrade of Silver Bell Road - Cedarvale Boulevard
intersection, relocation of Cedarvale Boulevard, modifications to Beau d' Rue Drive, modifications to
existing buildings, storm water control, landscaping and other related improvements will also be part of
project costs.
More detailed information about the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area can be found in the Cedar Grove
Redevelopment Plan on file at the Eagan City Hall.
APPENDIX 40? a-]
APPENDIX B
MAP OF THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND THE DISTRICT
APPENDIX B-2
4 t ME ~ U
CO M CL
EU
13 • ` 3 kM. O O
,
O 41
IHL"
~Cp d
n~ 9000 ~
o ~ ~ V
•y~
:
0
LL J W 8' $
O Q D Z o C7
W W Z o
rn 0 D W W
Ei j W QI o O <W1yGG
( a W Z -W'
>
r 0 m w W"
U W ( o a
W
m
`AL
40.
r
71,
io~ 7A
13 Ire
~P a J _ i • -7R~.
lip
fir;,.` rte ~r
ISO
ION
44
its ♦ ~ ~
z
jam; 4'~ fi tag r~ x
14,
s4l
e
APPENDIX C
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT
The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way identified by the parcels listed on the
following pages.
APPENDIX ~ c-t
20-Jul-01
+City of Eagan
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Parcel/Building Information
MAP ID: 1
TAXPIN: 106806003200 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 14.0
Property Owner: DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Land Value: $517,400.00 Net Tax: $19,797.16
% RONALD A HAVE Assessed Bldg. Value: 50.00 Special Assessment $0.00
8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $517,400.00 Total Tax: $19,797.16
BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sak Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: IND
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq.
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 2
TAXPIN: 10611IM02000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.1
Property Owner. DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Land Value: $70,000.00 Net Tax: $2,752.40
% RONALD A HAVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $70,000.00 Total Tax: $2,752.40
BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Lost Sale Date (nlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1.1 Land Use Guide: IND
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 3
TAXPIN: 106806004001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.5
Property Owner: PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $78.900.00 Net Tax: $1,209.54
144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $78,900.00 Total Tax: $1,209.54
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-4 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Geroge Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 4
TAXPIN: 106806005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.5
Property Owner. PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $108,700.00 Net Tax: $1,669.68
144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $108,700.00 Total Tax: $1,669.68
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Last Sale Date (nlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-4 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 5
TAXPIN: 101860001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 8.2
Property Owner. SILVER BELL BUSINESS CENTER INC Assessed Land Value: $628,000.00 Net Tax: $149,457.06
%ELLIOT J LARSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $3,470,000.00 Special Assessment $12,565.28
PO BOX 100 Total Assessed Value: 54,098,000.00 Total Tax: $162,022.34
WARROAD MN 56763-0100 Last Sale Date (myr): 11 1991 Sale Value: $1,950,000.00
Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1985 Building Type: WHSE,BUSCR
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 100,340.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 32
APPENDIX C-2
i L
MAP ID: 6
TAXPIN: 100190001102 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 4.9
Property Owner. BERNARD J MULCAHYCO INC Assessed Land Value: 5145,000.00 Net Tax: $3,757.40
2700 BLUE WATER ROAD STE 1DO Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 58.20316
Total Assessed Value: $145,000.00 Total Tax: $11,960.56
FAGAN MN 55121-1400 Last Sale Date (w#*): 0 0 Sao Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 7
TAXPN: 107550001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 6.0
Property Owner. TESSERACT OF EAGAN INC Assessed Land Value: 5769,800.00 Net Tax: $134,311.00
7760 FRANCE AVE S STE 1430 Assessed Bldg. Value: $2,720,200.00 Special Assessment 5867.34
Total Assessed Value: $3,490,000.00 Total Tax: 5735.178.34
BLOOMINGTON MN 55435 Last Sao Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale value: $0.00
Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1988 Building Type: CLASSROOM
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 35,800.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 10
MAP ID: 8
TAXPN: 107550001000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 6.1
Property Owner: SILL PROPERTIES Assessed Land Value: 5503,600.00 Net Tax: $17,164.14
5633 HWY 13 W Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $503,600.00 Total Tax: $17,164.14
SAVAGE MN 55378-1215 Last Sale Date (rnlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
*MAP ID: 9
TAXPN: 100190002025 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 6.9
Property Owner. R L BERNSTEIN Assessed Land Value: $295,800.00 Net Tax: 124,069.06
% WM G SMALL Assessed Bldg. Value: $368,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00
9714 OLD KATY RD Total Assessed Value: $664,600.00 Total Tax: $24,069.06
HOUSTON TX 77055.6209 Last Sale Date (wyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1963 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finished Bldg. Sq. tt : 22,240.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
'MAP ID: 11
TAXPN: 100190003025 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): - 7.6
Property Owner. CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $153,50D.00 Net Tax: $0.00
3795 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special AssessmeM $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $153,500.00 Total Tax: $0.00
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1318 Last Sale Date (n yr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. fl.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 15
TAXPN: 101370007001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.6
Property Owner. RANDALL J 6 SANDRA K OUAM Assessed Land Value: $82,100.00 NOT= $7,140.52
3925 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $143,900.00 Spacial Assessment 50.00
Total Assessed Value: 5226,000.00 Total Tax: $7,140.52
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1415 Last Sala Data (wd r): 6 1992 Sale Value: 5205.000.00
Zoning: GB Lard Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1977 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 7,080.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX ~ j C-3
MAP ID: 16
TAXPIN: 101370006001 Acres (total acres Of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner: KELLY 8 CONNIE PLOURDE Assessed Land Value: $60,800.00 Net Tax: 55,672.36
6100 AUTO CLUB RD UNIT 208 Assessed Bldg. Value: $127,200.00 Spacial Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $188,000.00 Tool Tax: $5,672.36
BLOOMINGTON MN 55438.2488 Last Sale Data (Myr): 12 1992 Sale Value: $88,914.00
Zoning: G8 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft- 3,642.0 Garage Sq. ft' 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 17
TAXPIN: 101370005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.8
Property Owner. JAMAL D ANSARI Assessed Land Value: $103,700.00 Net Tax: 14,652.60
3945 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $58,800.00 Special Assessment $178.94
Total Assessed Value: $162,500.00 Total Tax: $4,831.54
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1415 Last Sala Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale value: $0.00
Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg, Data: Year Built: 1976 Building Type: RESTAURANT
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 3,042.0 Garage Sq. tt: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 18
TAXPIN: 101370004001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9
Property Owner: SLED HEAD INC CIODBA LARSONS AUTOMOTI Assessed Lend Value: $113,200.00 Net Tax: $4,816.02
3955 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,800.00 SPecial Assessment $196.98
Total Assessed Value: $165,000.00 Toth lax: $5.013.00
EAGAN MN 55122-1411 Last Salo Date (rNyr): 11 1994 Sale Value: $178,108.00
Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1981 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finished Bldg. Sq. R.: 2,880.0 Garage Sq. fl: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 19
TAXPIN: 101370003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9
Property Owner: CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $120,100.00 Net Tax: $0.00
3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD Assessed Bldg. Value: 50.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $120,100.00 Total Tax: $O.00
EAGAN MN 55122-1810 Last Sale Date (rrW): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 20
TAXPIN: 101370002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9
Property Owner: STRATFORD HOLDINGLLC Assessed Land Value: $121,600.00 Net Tax: $8,690.60
%THE LANGFAN CO Assessed Bldg. Value: $140,400.00 Special Assessment 5210.32
6 45TH ST E Total Assessed Value: 5262,000.00 Total Tax: $8,900.92
NEW YORK NY 10017.2414 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1976 Building Type: RETAIL STR
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 4,500.0 Garage Sq. it: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 21
TAXPIN: 101370001001 Acres (total acres Of Tax Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner: SUPERIOR COLLISION & PAINT INC Assessed Land Value: $133,000.00 Nat Tax: $14,03142
3985 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 5274,DDO0 00 Special Assessmerd $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $407,000.00 Total Tax: $14,033.42
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1411 Last Sale Date (myr): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Lard Use Guido: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Buill: 1988 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finished Bldg. Sq. 11.: 12,162.0 Garage Sq. It. 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX C-4
MAP ID: 22
TAXPN: 100190001003 Acne (lotel scrss of Tax Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner. U-HAUL REAL ESTATE CO Assessed Land Value: 588,800.00 Net Tax: 53,504.72
PO BOX 29046 Assessed Bldg. Value: $29,200.00 Special Assessment $162.20
Total Assessed Value: 5118,000.00 Total Tax: $3,666.92
PHOENIX AZ 85038-9046 Last Sale Data (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land the Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1965 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finished Bldg. Sq. n: 1,534.0 Garage Sq. fl: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 25
TAXPN: 101670204108 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel)- 0.7
Property Owner: JOSEPH L d ELISE D STEINFELD Assessed Land Value: $41,600.00 Net Tax: $4,865.82
% ASK FINANCIAL Assessed Bldg. Value: $127,000.00 Special Assessment $0.00
4040 NICOLS RD Total Assessed Value: $168,600.00 ToUl Tax: 54,865.82
EAGAN MN 55122-1906 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 5 1998 Sale Value: $154,000.00
Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1978 BuBding Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. n : 3,912.D Garage Sq. h: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 26
TAXPN: 101670203108 Acres (total acres of Tax parcel): 0.3
Property Owner: LAWRENCE W 8 DONEENE WENZEL Assessed Land Value: 520,400.00 Net Tax: 5330.78
3600 KENNEBEE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $20,400.00 Total Tax: $330.78
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SO.DO
Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. 11:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 27
TAXPN: 101670202008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3
Property Owner: LAWRENCE W A DONEENE WENZEL Assessed Land Value: $36.900.00 Net Tax: $564.42
3600 KENNEBEE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $36.900.00 Total Tax: $564.42
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (rrdyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Sutra: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. h.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 28
TAXPN: 101670201008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3
Property Owner: DENNIS D & FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Land Value: 536,900.00 Net Tax: $564.42
50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 50.00
Total Assessed Value: $36,900.00 Total Tax: $564.42
MINNEAPOLIS MN 554031145 Last Sale Date (wyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. n: Garage Sq. R:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 29
TAXPN: 100190010008 Acre (total acres 01 Tax Paree9: 0.7
Property Owner. WING K SETO Assessed Land Value: $93.500.00 Not Tax: $5.272.32
4730 OAK CLIFF OR Assessed Bldg. Value: $80,200.00 Special Assessment $516.60
Total Assessed Value: $173,700.00 Total Tax: 55,78812
EAGAN MN 55122.3301 Last Sale Date 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1966 Building Type: RESTAURANT
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2.534.0 Garage Sq. h: 0
BEDS 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX 133 C-5
MAP ID: 30
TAXPM: 1 01 352001 000 Acme (total acres of Tax Parcel): 3.2
Property Owner. DENNIS D& FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Land Value: =57,800.00 Net Tax: 51,706.04
50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Spacial Assessmsrd $820.86
Total Assessed Value: $57,800.00 Total Tax: 52,526.90
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403.1145 Last Soh Date (rWyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Veer Bulth Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 31
TAXPM. 101352001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner: TIMOTHY J BEEBE Assessed Land Value: $50,300.00 Net Tax: $1,510.24
1671 E OLD SHAKOPEE RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $600.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $50,900.00 Total Tax: 51,510.24
BLOOMINGTON MN 55425.2444 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 12 1987 Sale Value: $111,750.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
MAP ID: 36
TAXPIN: 100190001111 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 9.6
Property Owner. LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Value: $419,900.00 Net Tax: $14,575.72
1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY APT 106 Assessed Bldg. Value: 548,200.00 Special Assessment 51,882.44
Total Assessed Value: $468,100.00 TotslTex: $16,458.16
SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3667 Last Sale Data (rrdW): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1900 BulldingType: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1228.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 2 BATH: 1
Bldg. Data: Yew Suitt: 1985 Building Type; WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. n.: 30,000.0 Garage Sq.11 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 37
TAXPNI: 100190004112 Acres (total was of Tax Parcel): 0.6
Property Owner. JOGS ELECTRIC CO Assessed Land Value: 537,200.00 Net Tax: $1.815.34
3980 BEAUDRUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 527,000.00 Special AssesameM $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $64200.00 Total Tax: $1,815.34
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (nVVT): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1960 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 2,012.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 38
TAXPW: 100190004212 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner: JOHN R LACHENMAYER Assessed Land Value: $60,800.00 Net Tax: $1,015.30
3986 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 5108.400.00 Special Assessment $180.84
Total Assessed Value: 5169,200.00 Total Tax: $1,196.14
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 9 1992 Sale Value: $87,500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1960 Building Type: S FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,049.0 Garage Sq. ft; 0
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
MAP ID: 39
TAXPIN: 100190001211 Acres (total acres of Tex Parcel): 1.9
Property Owner: LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Value: $103.800.00 Net Tax: $4,250.18
1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY APT 106 Assessed Bldg. Value: $400.00 Special Assessment 5438.44
Total Assessed Value: $104.200.00 Total Tax: $4.688.62
SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3667 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sae Value: $0.00
Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. H.: 12,385.0 Garage Sq. ft: O
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 4,668.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 4,500.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 3,616.0 Garage S44. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
MAP ID: 40
TAXPIN: 100190001008 Acres (tool acres of Tax Pat Q: 1.6
Property Owner. SINCLAIR MARKETING INC Assessed Land Value: 5169,900.00 NOT= $5,966.72
550 E SOUTH TEMPLE Assessed Bldg. Value: $25,100.00 Special Assessment 52,188.74
PO BOX 30625 Total Assessed Value: 5195,000.00 Total Tax: $8.155.46
SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-1005 Last Sets Date (mfyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1965 Building Type: SERVC STN
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,247.0 Garage Sq. M: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX C-7
MAP ID: 41
TAXPIN: 100190009009 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. JEFFREY SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $58,600.00 Net Tax: $3,698.12
1009 99TH ST Assessed Bldg. Value: $71,900.00 Special Assessment $122.42
Total Assessed Value: $130,500.00 Total Tax: 53,820.54
ROBERTS WI 54023.84D5 Last Sale Data (m/yr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00
Zoning: CSC Land ties Guide; SA
Bldg. Data: Year But": 1966 Building Type: CARWASH
Finished Bldg. Sq. IL: 2,562.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 0
MAP ID: 42
TAXPP4: 100190002008 Apes (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3
Property Owner: LARRY FRATTALONE Assessed Land Value: 530,000.00 Net Tax: $3,275.82
3527 LEXINGTON AVE N Assessed Bldg. Value: $85,800.00 Special Assessment $78.48
Total Assessed Value: $115.800.00 Total Tax: 53,354.30
ARDEN HILLS. MN 55126 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1965 Building Type: RETAIL STR
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 5,000.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 43
TAXPIN: 100190003008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner: GERALD HUSTON Assessed Land Value: $38.000.00 Net Tax: 52.049.66
608 OAKLAND DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $34,700.00 Special Assessment $99.40
Total Assessed Value: $72,700.00 Total Tax; $2,149.06
BURNSVILLE MN 55337-3604 Last Sale Date (Myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1967 Building Type: RETAIL STR
Finished Bldg. Sq. H.: 3,346.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 44
TAXPIN: 100190007008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner: BTA INV Assessed Land Value: $75,300.00 Net Tax: 17,947.80
A JAMES COOPER Assessed Bldg. Value: 5172.000.00 Special Assessment $0.00
3999 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $247,300.00 Total Tax: $7.947.80
EAGAN MN 55122-1421 Last Sale Date (Myr): 4 1987 Sole Value: $200.000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1970 Building Type: SERVC GAR
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 6,494.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 45
TAXPIN: 100190004006 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner: ROCKY L RANCH Assessed Land Value: $35,600.00 Not Tax: $2.316.74
18901 JORDAN TRL Assessed Bldg. Value: $45,700.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $81,300.00 TotalTax: $2.316.74
LAKEVILLE MN 55D44-7776 Last Sale Date (Wyr): 8 1994 Sale Value: $67,500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1968 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,920.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 46
TAXM: 100190005008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): D.3
Property Owner. JEFFREY D 5 SARAH J SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $24,800.00 Not Tax: $1,915.94
1009 99TH ST Assessed Bldg. Value: $42,300.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $67,100.00 Tool Tax: $1.915.94
ROBERTS WI 54023.8405 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 12 1989 Sale Value: $60,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Gutds: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1965 Building Type: LAUNDROMAT
FiMshed Bldg. Sq, ft.: 1.520.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX c-g
i t
MAP ID: 47
TAXPIN: 10019MI1100a Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. JOSEPH R MILBAUER Assessed Land Value: 144,600.00 Not Tax: $5,497.10
3997 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 1138,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $183,400.00 Total Tax: $5,497.10
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1421 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 10.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide- SA
Bldg. Data: Yaw Built: 1968 Building Type: RETAIL STR
FiMahed Bldg. Sq. ff.: 4,000.0 Garage Sq. It- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 48
TAXPIN: 100190002007 Acres (total sc a of Tax Parcel): 0.8
Property Owner: STEVE J 8 JANE M MARTIN Assessed Land Value: $81,200.00 Net Tax: $8,581.12
920 HARRIET AVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $182,700.00 Special Assessment 1296.62
Total Assessed Value: 1263,900.00 Total Tax: $8,877.74
SAINT PAUL MN 55126-8061 Last Sale Date (My): 12 1990 Sale Value: $275,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1971 Building Type: DAYCARECTR
Finished Bldg. Sq. R.: 3,480.0 Garage Sq. h: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 49
TAXPIN: 100190009006 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner. JOHN E a KATHLEEN LUNDEEN Assessed Land Value: 157,900.00 Net Tax: $5,905.62
8009 PENNSYLVANIA RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $140,100.00 Special Assessment $151.46
Total Assessed Value: $19B,000.D0 Total Tax: $6,057.08
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55438.1134 Last Sale Date (rntyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 9,130.0 Garage Sq. ti: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 4
MAP ID: 50
TAXPIN: 100190001107 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2
Property Owner: JOHN W FITZGERALD Assessed Land Value: $24,100.00 Net Tax: $4,823.20
3914 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 1149,900.00 Special Assessment $82.66
Total Assessed Value: $174,000.00 Total Tax: $4,905.86
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sale Date (rrJyr): 12 1994 Sale Value: $117,292.D0
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: 5,500.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH. 3
MAP ID: 51
TAXPIN: 100190005106 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 12.1
Property Owner: WAYZATA BAY CTR CO Assessed Land Value: $1,050200.00 Net Tax: $103,921.30
PO BOX 834 Assessed Bldg. Value: $1,637,600.00 Special Assessment $4,730.22
Total Assessed Value: 12,687,800.00 Total Tax: $108,651.52
NEW ULM MN 56073.0834 Last Sale Date (rnlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1965 Building Type: SHPCTR,COM
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 152,000.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH, 5
APPENDIX C-9
MAP ID: 52
TAXPIi: 100190001006 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 3.5
Property Owner. MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed Land Value: $276,800.00 Net Tax: $17.649.38
3900 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $220,200.00 Special Assessment $1,370.62
Total Assessed Value: $497,000.00 Total Tax: $19,020.00
EAGAN MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: s0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1963 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 13,811.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 4
TAXPIN: 100190001106 Acres (total stns of Tax Parcel): 3.5
Property Owner: MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed Land Value: $12,000.00 Net Tax: $487.78
39W SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 50.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $12,000.00 Total Tax: $487.78
EAGAN MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (mtyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 53
TAXPIN: 100190007106 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel):
Property Owner. PAUL C BECKER Assessed Lend Value: $19,200.00 Net Tax: $1,185.74
3912 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $24,500.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $43,700.00 Total Tax: $1,185.74
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (mfyr): 2 1997 Sale Value: $36,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: 900.0 Garage Sq. fl: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
TAXPIN: 100190007206 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel):
Property Owner. PAUL BECKER Assessed Land Value: $23,200.00 Net Tsx: $1,408.38
3908 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 528,700.00 Special Assessment 539.24
Total Assessed Value: $51,900.00 Total Tax: $1,447.62
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (rtVyr): 12 1988 Selo Value: $82,500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1969 Building Type: OFC,MD/DTL
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,080.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
TAXPIN: 100190007306 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel):
Property Owner: LAWRENCE D 8 LESLIE HAUGEN Assessed Land Value: $14,400.00 Net Tax: $914.66
4096 HAUTE LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $19,300.00 Special Assessment $39.24
Total Assessed Value: $33,700.00 Total Tax: $953.90
EAGAN MN 55122-2914 Last Sale Date (Myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. tt.: 670.0 Garage Sq. tt: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
TAXPIN: 100190007406 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel):
Property Owner. ALAN PAYMAR Assessed Land Value: $23,200.00 Net Tax: $1,625.10
3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 536,700.00 Special Assessment $39.24
Total Assessed Value: $59,900.00 Total Tax: $1,664.34
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (rtVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1.248.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 54
TAXPW: 101665012201 Apes (total acres of Tax Pat 1): 0.1
Property Owner. AMERICAN ACCOUNTS& ADVISORS INC Assessed Land Value: $12,300.00 Net Tax: $2,758.82
3904 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $72,700.00 Special Assessment 50.00
Total Assessed Value: $85,000.00 Total Tax: $2,758.82
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Lost Sale Date (Myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yen Built: 1976 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,400.0 Gangs Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX C-10
1 G
MAP ID: 55
TAXPIN: 10168SO12301 Acres (total act of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Property Owner. AMERICAN ACCOUNTS& ADVISORS INC Assessed Land Value- $15,100.00 Nel Tax: $3.044.68
3904 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $92,400.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $107,500.00 Total Tax: 53,044.68
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Dale (myr): 9 1995 Sale Value: 599,500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1976 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. K.: 3,168.0 Garage Sq. It: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 56
TAXPIN: 101665003101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2
Property Owner. MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: 522,600.00 Net Tax: 54,277.10
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $128.400.00 Special Assessment $50.82
3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: 5151,000.00 Total Tax: $4,327.92
EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last Sale Date (rnyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yen Built: 1974 Building Type: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL. 6,336.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 57
TAXPIN: 101685009001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 01
Property Owner: MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Lend Value: $8,700.00 Net Tax: 5258.54
3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $19.66
Total Assessed Value: 58,700.00 Total Tax: $278.20
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (m/yr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 58
TAXPIN: 1016850011101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Property Owner: MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value: $12,000.00 Net Tax: 42.225.18
3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $66.000.00 Special Assessment 427.10
Total Assessed Value: 478,000.00 Total Tax: 42,252.28
EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last Sale Dale (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SO.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year built: 1976 BuildingType: OFFICE
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,432.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 59
TAXPIN: 101685006201 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.0
Property Owner. MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value: $4,300.00 Net Tax: 4127.46
390D CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 49.82
Total Assessed Value: 44,300.00 Total Tax: 4137.28
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yen Built. Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 60
TAXPIN: 101685004001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Property Owner: MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed LOW Value: $8,300.00 Net Tax: 5338.76
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessmer $18.74
3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $8,300.00 Total Tax: 5357.52
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Data (myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Btlliding Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: Garage Sq. k:
BEDS: BATH:
APPENDIX 13,09 C-11
MAP ID: 61
TAXPN: 101665005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 01
Property Owner: MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: $8,700.00 Net Tax: 5355.66
PARRANTO FAM TST %A4ARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $19.60
3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $8,700.00 Total Tax: 5375.26
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Data (rnyr): 0 0 Sale Value: Sam
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: Geroge Sq. 4:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 62
TAXPN: 101665006001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2
Property Owner. MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: $9,000.00 Net Tax: $300.84
PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessmant $0.00
3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $9,000.00 Total Tax: 5300.84
EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 63
TAXPIN: 101690103000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1
Property Owner. MINNESOTAS CREDITUNION Assessed Land Value: $3,000.00 Not Tax: $122.06
3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $3.000.00 Total Tax: $122.06
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg, Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Geroge Sq. H:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 64
TAXPN: 101690104000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3
Property Owner: MINNESOTAS CREDITUNION Assessed Land Value: $6,300.00 Net Tax: 5255.90
3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $6,300.00 Total Tax: $255.90
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Salo Date (rtVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq, ti.: Geroge Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 65
TAXPN: 101690101001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner. MINNESOTAS CRE04TUNION Assessed Land Value: $72,800.00 Net Tax: $10,815.70
3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $248,100.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $320,900.00 Total Tax: $10,815.70
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Dale jnvVr): 4 1995 Sale Value: $274,204.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1975 Building Type: BANK
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 9.720.0 Garage Sq. ft-- 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 66
TAXPN: 103660001001 Acres (total acres of rat Parcel): 1.3
Property Owner. JENSEN JENSEN 6 JENSEN PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $116,500.00 Not Tax: $26,385.88
3840 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed SMg. Value: $598.500.00 Special Assessment 5395.50
Total Assessed Value: $715,000.00 Total Tax: $26.781.38
EAGAN MN 55122-1412 last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value, $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1974 Building Type: RESTAURANT
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 7,995.0 Geroge Sq. R: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
APPENDIX D c-12
MAP ID: 67
TAXPIN: 101660101001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 3.5
Property Owner. CEDARVALE BOWL INC Assessed Land Value: 5268,700.00 Net Tax: $30,455.46
3883 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $531,300.00 Special Assessment $802.80
Total Assessed Value: $800,000.00 Total Tax: $31,258.26
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Salo Date (rntyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1979 Building Type: BWLNGALLEY
Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: 32,661.0 Garage Sq n: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 4
MAP ID: 68
TAXPMI: 101690101000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2
Property Owner. ANA CORPORATION Assessed Lad Value: $3.300.00 Net Tax: $97.38
3830 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $3,300.00 Total Tax: $97.38
EAGAN MN 55122.1412 Last Sale Date (nwyr): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Edda: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: Garage Sq. R:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 69
TAXPIN: 101690102001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.3
Property Owner: IMAD ANSARI Assessed Land Value: $98,700.00 Net Tax: $5,832.22
4365 CAPRICORN CT Assessed Bldg. Value: $94,300.00 Special Assessment $519.90
Total Assessed Value: 5193.000.00 Total Tsx: 56,352.12
EAGAN MN 551231850 Last Salo Data (tNyr): 7 1993 Sale Value: $150.000.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1978 Building Type: CONV STORE
Finished Bldg. Sq. R.: 3,045.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 70
TAXPIN: 100190005004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner: JR MEGA INC Assessed Land Value: $87,200.00 Net Tax: $11,816.50
% GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: $263,000.00 Special Asseasment $0.00
2908 HAYES DRIVE Total Assessed Value: $350,200.00 Total Tax: $11.816.50
BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last Sale Date 10 1999 Sale Value: 5335.500.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 23,760.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 71
TAXPIN: 100190006004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.8
Property Owner: JR MEGA INC Assessed Land Value: $67,900.00 Net Tax: $2,837.22
% GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: $1,900.00 Special Assessment 50.00
2908 HAYES DRIVE Total Assessed Value: $69,800.00 Total Tax: $2.837.22
BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 72
'TAXPIN: 100190002004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.1
Property Owner. C B 6 R ENT Assessed Land Value: $92,400.00 Net Tax: $8,537.56
3810 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 5116,600.00 Special Assessment 50.00
Total Assessed Value: 5209,000.00 Total Tax: $8,537.56
SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1412 Last Sale Data 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1964 Building Type: WHSE.STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 9,554.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 5
APPENDIX / C-13
MAP ID: 73
TAXPIN: 100190003004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0
Property Owner: C B 8 R ENT Assessed Land Value: $85,800.00 Net Tax: $11,277.10
3835 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 5231,200.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $317,000.00 Total Tax: $11277.10
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1402 Last Sale Date (rtVyr): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Sift. Sq. fL: 15,699.0 Garage Sq. 1t: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 3
MAP ID: 74
TAXPIN: 100190001004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7
Property Owner: HANNA & KATHLEEN NASR Assessed Lend Value: $103,100.00 Net Tax: 54,659.54
% EXPRESS DONUTS Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,900.00 Special Assessment S44S.84
3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Total Assessed Value: 5155,000.00 Total Tax: 55,105.38
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1412 Last Selo Date (m/yr): 6 1988 Sale Value: $175,000.00
Zoning: CSC Land the Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: RESTAURANT
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,453.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 2
MAP ID: 80
TAXPW: 104445001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner: CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: 529,400.00 Net Tax: $1,324.56
3830 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $113,000.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $142.400.00 Total Tax: $1,324.56
EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Date (myr): 11 2000 Salo Value: 5145.000.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yea. Built: 1956 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,000.0 Garage Sq. h: 0
BEDS: 3 BATH: 135
MAP ID: 81
TAXPIN: 104445002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner: ALBERT 8 ALMA BIRR Assessed Land Value. $32,100.00 Net Tax: $1,289.30
1930 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $95,900.00 Special Assessment 50.00
Total Assessed Value: $128,000.00 Total Tex: $1,289.30
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1962 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: 1,248.0 Garage Sq. ft: 1216
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 82
TAXPIN: 104445003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner: JEFFREY G 8 MARY M HALL Assessed Land Value: 533,800.00 Net Tax: $1.159.40
1940 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $89,300.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: 5123,100.00 Total Tax: $1.159.40
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last Sale Date (YvV r): 5 1987 Salo Value: $70.000.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1952 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: 1,428.0 Garage Sq. ft: 672
BEDS: 4 BATH: 1
MAP ID: 83
TAXPIN: 10444SM001 Acres (total acres al Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. THOMAS G 8 JULIE A WOODNER Assessed Land Vaitle: 533,800.00 Net Tax: $1,526.42
3816 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $113,000.00 SpacialAssesinrem 5159.02
Total Assessed Value: $146,800.00 Total Tax: $1,685.44
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1401 Last Selo Date (Wyr): 4 1991 Sale Value: $85,000.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1958 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 1.184.0 Garage Sq tt: 0
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
APPENDIX c-14
r
MAP ID: 84
TAXPIN: 104445006101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. TONG YIA f: LIA VANG LOR Assessed Land Value: $32,100.00 Net Tau: $1,156.72
3822 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $84,500.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $116,600.00 Total Tax: $1.156.72
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1401 last SW Daft (Myr): 8 1990 Sale Value: $80,900.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1956 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq.1t.: 1,661.0 Garage Sq. ft: 464
BEDS: 3 BATH: 125
MAP ID: 85
TAXPW: 104445006201 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. ALBERT E HORROCKS Assessed Land Value: $30.500.00 Net Tax: 5464.74
PO BOX 157 Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment SO.DO
Total Assessed Value: $30,500.00 Total Tax: $464.74
CLARKS GROVE MN 56016-0157 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage 54 n:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 86
TAXPIN: 104445009001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. DORIS R TSTE DAHUNE Assessed Land Value: $33,800.00 Net Tax: 51,95116
3830 ALDER LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $135.700.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $169,500.00 Total Tax: $1,951.16
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1501 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1961 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,484.0 Garage Sq. ft: 440
BEDS, 4 BATH: 225
MAP ID: 87
TAXPIN: 104445010101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5
Property Owner. REM METRO SERVICES INC Assessed Land Value: $35,600.00 Net Tax: $2,506.36
6921 YORK AVE S Assessed Bldg. Value: $130,500.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $166,100.00 Total Tax: $2.506.36
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435-2587 Lost Sale Date (inlyr): 7 1993 Sale Value: $120,000.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1980 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,624.0 Garage Sq. ft: 962
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75
MAP ID: 88
TAXPIN: 104730001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner. DAKOTA COUNTY HRA Assessed Land Value: 524,000.00 Net Tax: $0.00
2496145TH ST W Assessed Bldg. Value: $160,200.DO Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $184.200.00 Total Tax: $0.00
ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4947 Last Sale Data (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SO.DO
Zoning: R-2 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Date: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,136.0 Garage Sq. ft: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,136.0 Garage Sq. fl: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 89
TAXPIN: 104730002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4
Property Owner. JAMES A HUEY Assessed Land Value: $40,600.00 Net Tax: $2,581.90
1993 GOLD TRAIL Assessed Bldg. Value: $154,800.00 SpecialAssessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $195,400.00 Total Tex: $2,581.90
EAGAN MN 55122-1589 Last Salo Date (wdW): 6 1999 Sala Value: $135,000.00
Zoning: R-2 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,172.0 Garage Sq. ft: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,172.0 Gangs Sq. et: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
APPENDIX c-15
MAP ID: 90
TAXPM: 104730003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.6
Property Owner. RONALD D CASPER Assessed Land Value: $40,600.00 Net Tax: $1,671.82
1989 GOLD TR Assessed Bldg. Value: $150,600.00 Special Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: $191,200.OD Total Tax: $1,671.82
EAGAN MN 55122.1589 Last Sale Date (►Nyr): 6 1998 Sale Value: $148,000.00
Zoning: R-2 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. fu 1,156.0 Garage Sq. ft: 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Raiding Type: TWIN HOME
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 1,156.0 Garage Sq. fL- 264
BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 92
TAXPM: 104400001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Portal): 0.8
Property Owner: DARYL J 8 NORI A HART Assessed Land Value: $54,9DO.OD Net Tax: $1,612.42
3850 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $97,900.00 Spacial Assessment $0.00
Total Assessed Value: 5152,800.00 Total Tax: $1,612.42
SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (Myr): 10 1994 Sale Value: $100.000.00
Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1934 Building Type: S.FAM.RES
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,440.0 Garage Sq. ft: 938
BEDS: 1 BATH: 1.5
MAP ID: 93
TAXPIN: 108470001000 Acres (total acres of Tax Pareel): 1.0
Property Owner: TERRY E TSTE STOVER Assessed Land Value: $47,600.00 Net Tax: $1,243.46
3906 RAHN RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $623.22
Total Assessed Value: $47,600.00 Total Tax: $1,866.68
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1523 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Bulft: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 95
TAXPM: 100170002054 Acres (total acres of Tax Portal): 1.2
Property Owner: FRANCHISE REALTY INT CORP Assessed Land Value: S189,4DO.DO Net Tax: $16,419.34
THOMAS P BUTLER Assessed Bldg. Value: $275,600.00 Special Assessment $0.00
7735 GIBRALTAR TEAR Total Assessed Value: $465,DDO.00 Total Tax: $16,419.34
APPLE VALLEY MN 55124.6124 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1974 Building Type: REST FSTFD
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 4.564.0 Garage Sq. 1t: 0
BEDS: D BATH: 2
MAP ID: 96
TAXPIN: 106810001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Pral): 6.5
Property Owner. CHASKA INV LTD PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: 5562,000.00 Net Tax: $37,362.96
7301 OHMS LANE Assessed Bldg. Value: $443,000.00 Special Assessment 50.00
SUITE 390 Total Assessed Value: $1,005,000.00 Total Tax: $37,362.96
EDINA MN 55439.2351 Last Sale Date (mry►): 0 0 S♦le Value: $0.00
Zoning: NB Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1979 Building Type: SHPCTR,NBH
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 39,920.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: 13
MAP ID: 97
TAXPM: 101605011101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.0
Property Owner. MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value: $1,100.00 Nat Tax: $32.28
3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 52.66
Total Assessed Value: $1,100.00 Total Tax: $34.94
EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sala Date (mryr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: CSC Lend Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: YewBulK: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
APPENDIX C-16
MAP ID: 98
TAXPIN: 106820001000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.0
Property Owner: DUKE REALTY LTD PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $100.00 NOT= $3.62
% ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00
1550 UTICA AVE S. SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $100.00 Total Tax: $3.62
ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Last Sale Date (W r): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00
Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type:
Finished Bldg. Sq.1t.: Garage Sq. ft:
BEDS: BATH:
MAP ID: 99
TAXPW: 106820001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 16.6
Property Owner: DUKE REALTY LTD PTNSHP AssesW Land Value: $1265,300.00 Net Tax: 5306,187.20
% ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $6,639,700.00 Special Asseumenl $12,074.84
1550 UTICA AVE S SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $7,905,000.00 Total Tax: $318,262.04
ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Last Salo Date (nV r): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00
Zoning: PD Land Use Gulds: SA
Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1998 Building Type: WHSE,STRG
Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 235,000.0 Geroge Sq. ft: 0
BEDS: 0 BATH: e
'The City has proposed that parcel numbers 100190002025 (Map ID 9) and 100190003025 (Map ID 11) be combined prior to certification of the District,
no later than June 30, 2002. If the lot combination does not take place prior to that date, parcel number 100190003025 will be eliminated from the District.
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Totals
Total Area (acres.): 181.1
Total Finished Bldg. 910,984.00
APPENDIX ~ C-17
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area
Parcels or Portions of Parcels in Right-of-way
Taxpin Right-of-way Owner name Parcel Acreage
100190001025 SHELDON & MARY RAMNARINE 0.066
100190001102 BERNARD J MULCAHYCO INC 0.585
100190002004 C B & R ENT 0.052
100190003004 C B & R ENT 0.283
100190006004 JR MEGA INC 0.121
100190001106 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.028
100190001006 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.296
100190002009 CITY OF EAGAN 0.219
100190002026 STATE OF MN 3.365
100190001426 STATE OF MN 1.221
100190005106 WAYZATA BAY CTR CO 0.645
100190001226 CITY OF EAGAN 1.096
100190001111 LEO MOGOL 0.332
100190001008 SINCLAIR MARKETING INC 0.131
100190001211 LEO MOGOL 0.114
100190002007 STEVE J & JANE M MARTIN 0.123
100190004008 ROCKY L RANCH 0.064
100190005008 JEFFREY D & SARAH J SCHENDEL 0.045
100190001107 JOHN W FITZGERALD 0.078
100190004112 JOOS ELECTRIC CO 0.119
100190008008 JOSEPH R MILBAUER 0.449
100190008006 JOHN E & KATHLEEN LUNDEEN 0.238
100190004212 JOHN R LACHENMAYER 0.065
100190003012 HANSEN METCALF ENT 0.091
100190002012 GORDON & ALICE KOPACEK 0.098
100190007008 BTA INV 0.39
100190002027 STATE OF MN 1.303
100190009008 JEFFREY SCHENDEL 0.182
100190010008 WING K SETO 0.673
100190001027 STATE OF MN 1.46
APPENDIX ~ c-18
I 4
APPENDIX D
ESTIMATED CASH FLOW FOR THE DISTRICT
APPENDIX D-1
6/16/01 Pogo 1 of 1
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
PLEASE READ ALL ASSUMPTIONS
District: New Redevelopment District
Inflation Rate 0.0000%
Pay As You Go Revenue Note Rate 8.501/6
Fiscal Disp. Contribution Ratio WA Pay 2001
Pooling Assumption 25.00%
Assumes First Tax Increment 2004
Assumes Last Tax Increment 2029
Years of Tax Increment 26
Present Value Date 02-01.2002
Tax Extension Rate 0.965780 After Ed Adj.
Area Wide Rate WA Pay 2001
Amount of increment will very depending upon market value, tax rates, cis" rates,
construction schedule, and inflation on market value. Inflation on tax rates
cannot be captured.
FROZEN TAX CAPACITY
Land Market Building Market Total Market Class Base Tax
PID Value Value Value Rate Capacity
Office & Retail Project 10,841,600 16,308,400 27,150.000 1.50%-2.00% 604,394
Housing Project 1,018.700 424,100 1,442,800 1.00% 14,428
TOTAL 11,860,300 16.732.500 28,592,800 618,822
PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION
Tax Capacity Total
Phase Development Sq. Ft. - Market Value Minus Tax Capacity Tax Market
Type Rooms Sq. Ft. - Room Fis, Dis. Rate Value Payable
1 Office Showroom 300,000 585.00 439,250 439,250 1.50%-2.00% 22,000,000 2004
1 Retail 50,000 $90.00 89,250 89,250 1.50%-2.00% 4,500,000 2004
1 Aptartments 200 $65,000.00 162,500 162,500 125% 13.000.000 2004
1 Hotel 200 $100,000.00 399,250 399,250 1.50%-2.00% 20.000.000 2004
1 Aptartments 300 $65,000.00 243,750 243,750 1.25% 19,500,000 2004
1 Rental Townhom 70 $65,000.00 56,875 56,875 1.25% 4,550,000 2004
1 Retail 50,000 $90.00 89,250 89.250 1.25% 4,500,000 2004
1 Aptartments 750 565,000.00 609.375 609,375 125% 48,750,000 2004
1 Houses 36 $200,000.00 72,000 72.000 1.00% 7,200,000 2004
1 Houses 24 5225,000.00 54,000 54,000 1.00% 5,400,000 2004
2 Houses 80 5225,000.00 180,000 180,000 1.00% 18,000,000 2005
2 Houses 32 $225,000.00 72,000 72,000 1.00% 7200,000 2005
• 2 Retail 20,000 $90.00 35,250 35,250 0.0125 1,800,000 2005
3 Houses 72 $250,000.00 180,000 180,000 1.00•/. 18,000,000 2006
3 Houses 32 5275,000.00 88,000 88,000 1.00% 8,800,000 2006
3 Office 600,000 $100.00 145,250 145,250 1.25% 7,300,000 2006
TOTAL 2,916,000 2,916,000 210,500,000
PLAN-3.xis
I
6/16/01
►lqe 1 xd 1
TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW
Begenig Period Amual Pmod Captured Sa Annual Slue A&m POOR rq Sem -Anrenl Erdiv
Base Tax Tax Tax Cowity Grose Aod. Par wd ParTom parr wd No Period
Ym ABh. Yr. CRPdty Cc-macity ifxxen-d 0.25% 10.00% 1500% In 17-6 4Ah. Yr.
0.0 1-Fab 2002 616,822 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1-Aug 2002
0.0 1-Aug 2002 616,922 618,822 0 0 0 0 O 0 0.0 1-Feb 200.3
0.0 1-Feb 2003 618,822 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1-Aug 2003
O.0 1-Aug 2003 618,622 618.822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1-Feb 2004
0.0 1-Fab 2004 618,922 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1-Aug 2004
0.5 1-Aug 2004 616,622 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1-Fab 2005
1.0 1-Fab 2005 616.622 616.922 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 1-Aug 2005
1S 1-Aug 2005 618,822 618.822 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 1-Fab 2006
2.0 1-Feb 2006 616,822 2215,500 1,596,979 771,020 (1,928) (26.909) (115.364) 576,819 2.5 1-Aug 2006
2.5 1-Aug 2006 619,822 2215,500 1,506.679 771,020 (1,928) (16,909) (115,364) 576.819 3.0 1-Fab 2007
3.0 1-Feb 2007 618,822 2.502.750 1.863.929 909.730 (2274) (90.746) (136.118) 680,592 35 I-Aug 2007
3.5 1-Aug 2007 618,822 2.502,750 1,1183.929 909.730 (2.274) (90,746) (136.118) 680.592 4.0 1-Fab 2006
4.0 1-F b 2006 618,922 2.016,000 2297,179 1,109285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 629,983 4.5 1-Aug 2008
4.5 1-Aug 2008 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109.285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 629.893 5.0 1-Fab 2009
5.0 1-Feb 2009 618,022 2,916,000 2,207,179 1,ID9285 (2,773) (110.651) (165,977) 829.883 5.5 1-Aug 2009
55 1-Aug 2009 616,922 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 6.0 1-Fab 2010
6.0 1Ftl 2010 618,922 2.916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 6.5 1-Aug 2010
6.5 1-Aug 2010 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 7.0 1-Fab 2011
7.0 1-Feb 2011 618,822 2,916,000 2,207.179 1,108,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 7.5 1-Aug 2011
7.5 1-Aug 2011 616.822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 8.0 1-Fab 2012
8.0 1-Fab 2012 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 as 1-Aug 2012
8.5 1-Aug 2012 618.822 2,916,000 2,297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (11D,651) (165,977) 829,863 9.0 I-Feb 2013
90 1-Fab 2013 618.822 2,916.000 2.297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,893 9.5 1-Aug 2013
95 I-Aug 2013 618,822 2.916,000 2197,179 1.109.285 (2.773) (110.651) (165,977) 929.883 100 1-Fab 2014
10.0 1-Fab 2014 618,822 2,916,000 2.297.179 1,109,265 (2.773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 10.5 1-Aug 2014
105 1.Aug 2014 618,022 2,916,000 2.297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.077) 629.693 11.0 1-Feb 2015
11.0 1-Fab 2015 619.822 2.916.000 2.297,179 1,109,285 (2773) (110.651) (165,077) 829,683 11.5 1-Aug 2015
11.5 1-Aug 2015 618,922 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109.285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 629,663 12.0 1-Fab 2016
12.0 1-Feb 2016 618.822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1109.285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 12.5 1-Aug 2016
12.5 1-Aug 2016 610,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109.285 (2773) (110.651) (165,077) 829,833 13.0 1-Fab 2017
13.0 1-Feb 2017 618,822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 13.5 1-Aug 2017
13.5 I-Aug 2017 618.822 2.01.000 2197,179 1,109.285 (2773) (119651) (165,977) 829,883 14.0 1Fab 2018
14.0 1-Fab 2018 618.922 2,916,000 2,297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,683 14.5 I-Aug 2018
14.5 1-Aug 2018 618.822 2,916.000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,683 150 1-Feb 2019
15.0 1-Feb 2019 616.822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,893 15.5 1-Aug 2019
15.5 1-Aug 2019 618,822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829183 16.0 1-Fab 2020
16.0 1-Feb 2020 618.822 2,916,000 2.297.179 1.109.285 (2.773) (110.651) (165.977) 629083 16.5 1-Aug 2020
16.5 1-Aug 2020 618,022 2,916,ODD 2297.179 1,109.285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 17.0 1-Feb 2021
17.0 1-F b 2021 SISA22 2.916.000 2297,170 1,109,286 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 17.5 I-Aug 2021
17.5 1-Aug 2021 610.822 2,916,000 2.97.179 1,109,265 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 629.683 18.0 1-Fob 2022
18.0 1-Fab 2022 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1.108285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 19.5 1-Aug 2022
18.5 1-Aug 2022 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,1183 190 1-Fab 2023
190 1-Fab 2023 618,822 2.916,000 2297,179 1,109.285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829683 19.5 1-Aug 2023
19.5 1-Aug 2023 618.622 2,916.000 2,297,179 1,109295 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,983 200 1-Feb 2024
20,0 1-Fab 2024 618.822 2,916,000 2197,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110.651) (165,977) 829,883 20.5 1-Aug 2024
20.5 1-" 2024 618.822 2.916.000 2.297.179 1,100,295 (2,773) (110.651) (165077) 829,883 21.0 1-Feb 2025
21.0 1-Fob 2025 618.822 2.916.000 2.297.179 1,109.95 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829683 21.5 1-Aug 2025
21.5 1-Aug 2025 616,822 2.916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110.661) (165,977) 829,883 22.0 1-Feb 2026
220 /Feb 2026 616,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 22.5 I-Aug 2026
22.5 1-Aug 2026 618.822 2,916.000 2,297.179 1,100285 (2702 (110,851) (165077) 829,883 23.0 1-Fab 2027
23.0 1Fab 2027 618.822 2,916.OOO 2.97,179 1,100185 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 629,883 23.5 1-Aug 2027
23.5 1-Aug 2027 619,822 2,916,000 2297.179 11092115 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,863 24.0 IFeb 2023
24.0 I-Fab 2028 618.822 2.916.000 2297.179 1,100285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 24.5 1-Aug 2028
24.5 1-Aug 2026 619.022 2,915,000 2297,179 /,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 25.0 1-Feb 2029
25.0 1-Feb 2029 618.822 2,016,000 2297,179 1,109285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 029,863 25.5 1-Aug 2029
255 1-A 2029 618.822 2,916.000 2297,179 1,100185 ,773 (110,651 (165,977 829,683 26.0 1-Fab 2030
TOTALS 52,170,020 130,425) 5203.959) (7.805,939) 39.029.696
PRESENT VALUE 15,468.323 11.572,239
PLAN-3.x4
APPENDIX E
MINNESOTA BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FORM
(MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT)
APPENDIX E-t
i G
"'N`N NAVE S,p 2'
9
Trade 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form
Economic
Development
■ The 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form (MBAF) is used to report each business subsidy and financial
assistance agreement signed from January 1. 2000 through December 31, 2000 per Minn Stat. § 116J.993 to
§ 116J.995. Please use a separate form to report each agreement; for agreements signed from August 1, 1999
though December 31, 1999, use the 2000 MBAF; and for agreements signed from July 1, 1995 through July 31,
1999 use the 1999 MBAF.
■ The following government agencies must submit a 2001 MBAF even if an agreement was not signed during the
period January 1. 2000 through December 31, 2000: 1) any local government/agency that signed a business
subsidy agreement since January 1, 1996, or represents a population of more than 2,500; 2) all state government
agencies. If the local/state government agency does not have any subsidies or assistance to report, please answer
questions 1 through 13 and questions 33 and 34.
■ If a local or state government agency that is required to report has not done so by April 1, DIED will mail a
warning. If it fails to report by June 1, it may not award any business subsidies until a report has been filed.
■ Questions? Call (651) 296-0580. Information on where to mail or fax your completed MBAF(s) is on page 4.
Section 1 Information About Grantor
I. Name of grantor (funding entity) 2. Name of person completing this form
3. Street address 4. City 5. ZIP code
6. County 7. Phone number 8. Fax number 9. E-mail address
10. Please indicate who in your organization should receive the 2002 MBAF if different from the person in Question 2.
Name/Title Phone number Street address city ZIP code
11. Classification of grantor (Mark one. if grantor is entity 12. Has your organization held a public hearing on and
created by govt agency, please indicate affiliation. For adopted criteria for awarding business subsidies in
example, a city EDA would check "City government.) compliance with Minn. Stat. § 1 161.994? (Mark one.)
0 City government O Yes (Indicate hearing date - and attach criteria)
0 County government O No
0 Regional government 0 We held a public hearing but have not yet adopted
O State government criteria (Indicate date of initial hearing - )
0 Other (Please specify.) 0 Other (Please attach explanation.)
13. Has your organization signed any agreements to award a business subsidy or financial assistance from January 1, 2000
through December 31, 2000 that is required to be reported under Minn. Stat. § 1161993 and § 116!.994? (Mark one.)
D Yes (Complete the remainder ojthe jorm.) O No (Stop here. go to section S on page 4)
Section 2 Information About Recipient
14. Name of business or organization 15. Address where business subsidy or financial assistance
receiving subsidy or financial assistance will be used
Street address City State ZIP code
16. Does the recipient have a parent corporation? (Mark one.)
0 Yes (Indicate name and address of parent corporation below. lfmore than one, indicate ultimate owner.)
O No
Name of parent corporation Street address City State ZIP code
2001 Minnesota Business Assislance Form Page 1 of4 Department of Trade and Economic Development
L
17. Industry of recipient's facility (Mark one.).
O Manufacturing O Services O Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
O Retail Trade O Wholesale Trade O Construction O Other (please specify)
18. Did the recipient relocate as a result of signing this agreement? (Mark one.)
O Yes (Indicate city and state of previous address and reason recipient did not complete this project at that address.)
O No (Go to Question I9.)
City/State of previous address Reason project not completed at previous address
19. Would the recipient have remained in previous location or relocated elsewhere if not awarded this business subsidy or
financial assistance? (Mark one.)
O Remained at previous location O Relocated to different Minnesota location O Relocated outside Minnesota
Section 3 General Information About the Agreement
20. Total dollar value of business subsidy or financial 21. Date agreement signed (In addition to the agreement
assistance (Please separate value by type in Questions 24 date, indicate any dates the agreement was amended.)
and 2S.)
22. Benefit date (Indicate the date the recipient will benefit from the business subsidy or financial assistance. For example,
indicate the date improvements were finished, equipment was placed into service, or the recipient occupied the property,
whichever is earlier.)
23. Does the agreement provide a business subsidy or one of the four types of financial assistance (see Question 25) required to
be reported? (Mark one.)
O business subsidy O financial assistance
24. If the agreement provided a business subsidy, please 25. If the assistance was one of the four types of financial
indicate the type(s) and total dollar value for each type. assistance, please indicate the type(s).
O not applicable, agreement provided financial assistance O not applicable, agreement provided a business subsidy
O loan (only principal) S O assistance for property polluted S
0 grant (i.e., forgivable loan) $ by contaminants
O tax abatement S O assistance for renovating building $
O TIF or other tax reduction or deferral S stock or bringing it up to code, and
O guarantee of payment S assistance provided for designated
O contribution of property or infrastructure $ historic preservation districts, when
O preferential use of governmental facilities $ 50% or less of total cost
O land contribution s O assistance for pollution control or S
O other (Speck subsidy type.) S abatement
O assistance for a TIF soils condition district S
26. If the assistance included tax increment financing, please 27. Are any other grantors providing a business subsidy or
indicate the type of TIF district? (Mark one.) financial assistance to the scum project? (Mark one.)
O not applicable, assistance was not in the form of TIF O Yes (Specify each grantor and the value of their
assistance below; attach an additional sheet if necessary)
O redevelopment
O renewal and renovation O No
O soils condition
O economic development Grantor(s) and value of the agreement(s):
O mined underground space
O hazardous substance subdistrict
Grantor Value (S)
Grantor Value (S)
2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Page 2 of 4 Department of Trade and Economic Developmcni
1 I
Section 4 Goals and Public Purpose Identified in the Agreement
28. Minn. Stat. § 1 16J.994 requires that business subsidy and financial assistance agreements state a public purpose. Which
of the following public purposes were stated in the agreement? (Mark all that apply.)
0 Enhancing economic diversity 0 Increasing tax base (cannot be only purpose)
0 Creating high-quality job growth 0 Other (please specify)
0 Job retention
0 Stabilizing the community
29. Indicate whether the agreement included the following types of goals, and whether the recipient had attained those goals
at the time of this report. (Fill in the boxes and attainment date(s) for each goal.)
Goals Target attainment All goals
established? dates (month & year) attained?
A) Specific wage and job goals to be attained within 2 years O Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No
B) Other job-creation and/or retention goals O Yes O No 0 Yes 0 No
C) Other wage goals 0 Yes O No 0 Yes 0 No
D) Other goals other than wage and job goals O Yes 0 No O Yes O No
(Please attach descriptions of goals and progress toward
attainment if not documented in Questions 30 and 31.)
30. For each of the following wage categories, indicate the job creation and/or retention goals stated in the
agreement and the average hourly value of any employer-provided health insurance goals for those jobs. (Only indicate
job creation goals in full-time equivalents if you are unable to separate goals by full- and part-time positions.)
Full-time Part-time/ FTE (only If goals not
Hourly Wage Job Seasonavremp. stated as FT/M Job Retention Hourly Value of
(excluding benefits) Creation Job Creation Job Creation Health Insurance
no hourly wage-level goal s
less than 57.00 s
57.00 to 58.99 S
59.00 to $10.99 s
Sl 1.00 to 512.99 s
'13 00 to 51 4 99 S
S 15.00 and higher s
31. For each of the following wage categories, indicate the number of actual jobs created and/or retained since the benefit
date and the actual hourly value of any employer-provided health insurance for those jobs. (Only indicate job creation in
full-time equivalents if you are unable to separate job creation into full- and part-time positions.)
Full-time Part-time/ FTE onl if unable to
Hourly Wage Job seasonavremp. separate FT/PT) Job Retention Hourly Value of
(excluding benefits) Creation Jab Creation Job Creation Health Insurance
less than 57.00 s
57.00 to 58.99 s
$9.00 to 510.99 s
S 11.00 to S 12.99 s
S13.00 to S14.99
s
S 15.00 and higher s
32. Has the recipient achieved all goals (see Questions 29, 30 and 31) and fulfilled all obligations stipulated in the agreement?
(Mark one.)
0 Yes O No
2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Page 3 of 4 Department of Trade and Economic Development
IS,_3
Section 5 Recipients Failing to Fulfill Obligations
(Do not complete this section if you completed it on another 1001 MBAF submitted to DTED.)
33. During the period January 1, 2000 through December 3t, 2000, did your organization have any recipients who failed to
report as required by Minn. Stat. § 1161.993 and § 1161.994? (Mark one)
O Yes (Indicate the name of each recipient Jailing to report and the value of subsidy or financial assistance awarded to that
recipient. Attach additional pages ifnecessary.)
O No
Name of recipient Type of subsidy or assistance (See Questions 24 and 25.) Value of subsidy or assistance
34. Did your organization have any recipients who failed to achieve any goals or fulfill any other obligations under an
agreement signed on or after January I, 2000, that were required to be fulfilled by the time of this report? (Mark one.)
O Yes (Complete the remainder of this section) O No (Stop here and submit form to DTED
35-39. 39. Provide the following information for each recipient failing to fulfill goals or any other terms of an agreement that
were to be attained by the time of reporting. (Attach additional pages ifnecessary)
35. Information on recipient and agreement:
Name of recipient in default Type of subsidy or assistance Initial value of
subsidy or assistance
Street address of recipient City/ZIP code of recipient Outstanding value of
subsidy or assistance
36. Rcason(s) for default (Mark all that apply.).
O recipient ceased operation O recipient relocated to a different community
O recipient was unable to fill vacant positions O other (Specify reason)
37. To date, has the recipient fui illed its repayment obligation? (Mark one.)
O Yes O No, recipient has begun to repay the assistance. O No, recipient has not begun to repay the assistance.
38. Has the agreement been amended to extend the recipient's deadline for fulfilling its obligations? (Mark one.)
0 Yes O No
39. Describe the steps being taken to bring recipient into compliance or recoup the subsidy:
Return your completed MBAF(s) by April 1.2001, to:
2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form
Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development - AEO
500 Metro Square, 121 East 7' Place
St. Paul, MN 55101-2146
Or fax to: (651) 215-3841
2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Page 4 of 4 Department of Trade and Economic Development
f
1 r
APPENDIX F
REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT
CITY OF EAGAN
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT
ID CODE SUBSTANDARD SITE AREA COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE
DETERMINATION (s.f.) % COVERAGE (s.f.) OUANTITY
ID-01/02 N 723,054.72 77.51 560,412.32 723,054.72
ID-03 _ 608,746.48 12.1 73,858.20 -
ID-04 _ 46,665.70 0.0 - -
ID-05 _ 67,010.41 4.0 2,698.17 -
ID-06 _ 64,583.75 1.7 1,092.03 -
ID-07 _ 801.91 0.0 - -
ID-08 N 358,870.83 84.2 302,170.42 358,870.83
ID-09 Y 282,554.56 61.1 172,635.64 282,554.56
ID-10 Y 54,103.42 68.8 37,210.49 54,103.42
ID-11/12 N 628,802.97 18.5 116,180.27 628,802.97
ID-14 Y 29,466.50 75.8 22,326.93 29,466.50
ID-15 _ 213,987.73 0.0 -
ID-17 _ 265,048.62 0.0 - -
ID-18 N 261,356.84 45.9 119,938.62 261,356.84
ID-20 Y 46.219.11 85.1 39.350.86 46,219.11
ID-21 N 43,602.19 100.0 43,602.19 43,602.19
ID-22 _ 42,886.34 53.3 22,843.42 42,886.34
ID-23 _ 8,326.69 100.0 8,326.69 8,326.69
ID-24 N 55,171.74 77.9 42,980.88 55,171.74
ID-25 _ 33,970.83 98.4 33,414.08 33,970.83
ID-26 Y 58,236.53 81.9 47,709.01 58,236.53
ID-27 N 153,558.95 71.6 109,997.63 153,558.95
ID-28 _ 6,003.22 17.0 1,022.00 6,003.22
ID-30 Y 29,135.97 64.2 18,695.27 29,135.97
ID-32 _ 12,534.89 36.8 4,609.88 12,534.89
ID-33 _ 12,004.58 0.0 - -
ID-34 Y 138,408.48 49.2 68,159.92 138,408.48
ID-35 Y 27,353.69 68.6 18,754.03 27,353.69
ID-37 N 20,250.69 72.7 14,714.65 20,250.69
ID-39 Y 34,580.17 71.3 24,642.46 34,580.17
ID-40 _ 525,082.40 83.8 439,882.01 525,082.40
ID-42 Y 37,742.72 56.1 21,160.69 37,742.72
ID-43 _ 8,972.22 100.0 8,972.22 8,972.22
ID-44 _ 42,857.21 0.0 - -
ID-45 _ 2,907.61 100.0 2,907.61 2,907.61
ID-46 _ 40,032.89 0.0 - -
ID-47 _ 2,769.22 100.0 2,769.22 2,769.22
ID-48 Y 7,536.10 100.0 7,536.10 7,536.10
ID-49 Y 4,016.52 100.0 4,016.52 4,016.52
ID-50 _ 1,444.68 100.0 1,444.68 1,444.68
ID-51 _ 2,905.53 100.0 2,905.53 2,905.53
ID-52 Y 40,547.96 58.9 23,896.12 40,547.96
ID-53 _ 380.77 100.0 380.77 380.77
APPENDIX F- I
ID-54 Y,Y 26,605.98 100.0 26,605.98 26,605.98
ID-55 Y 5,045.56 100.0 5,045.56 5,045.56
ID-56 Y 4,087.84 100.0 4,087.84 4,087.84
ID-57 N 44,339.18 38.5 17,081.24 44,339.18
ID-58 Y 29,598.66 64.0 18,954.72 29,598.66
ID-59 Y,N 419,872.95 26.1 109,621.26 419,872.95
ID-60 Y 35,249.93 69.6 24,528.42 35,249.93
ID-61 Y,Y 83,024.32 100.0 83,024.32 83,024.32
ID-62 Y 69,066.49 57.4 39,618.30 69,066.49
ID-63 N 17,785.62 89.4 15,89428 17,785.62
ID-64 Y 9,647.09 54.6 5,265.74 9,647.09
ID-65 N 28,951.93 62.5 18,089.05 28,951.93
ID-66 Y 12,386.34 77.4 9,585.55 12,386.34
ID-67 Y 19,000.04 87.2 16,565.47 19,000.04
ID-68 Y 24,819.00 38.5 9,560.42 24,819.00
ID-69 Y 22,280.59 62.8 13,988.76 22,280.59
ID-70 Y 14,999.99 64.5 9,676.52 14,999.99
ID-71 N 43,573.01 28.6 12,458.69 43,573.01
ID-72 Y 30,106.60 74.0 22,274.60 30,106.60
ID-73 Y 77,538.16 13.3 10,344.43 -
ID-74 N 23,441.72 72.0 16,874.62 23,441.72
ID-75 Y,Y 73,435.49 31.0 22,756.35 73,435.49
ID-76 _ 138,773.98 3.4 4,767.26 -
ID-77 Y 28,749.96 56.9 16,344.72 28,749.96
ID-78 Y 31,176.92 55.3 17,234.23 31,176.92
ID-79 Y 21,600.00 28.6 6,177.77 21,600.00
ID-80 _ 11,049.33 0.0 - -
ID-81 _ 186,738.62 0.0
ID-B2 _ 11,248.88 0.0 - -
D-83 - 13,561.31 0.0 - -
ID-84 Y 30,791.25 41.3 12,731.13 30,791.25
ID-85 Y 18,963.49 12.5 2,377.34 -
ID-86 Y 18,963.86 26.6 5,049.38 18,963.86
ID-87 Y 18,963.89 23.5 4,465.02 18,963.89
ID-88 Y 22,499.41 18.9 4,244.30 22,499.41
ID-89 N 22,499.44 18.2 4,103.53 22,499.44
ID-90 y 22,499.43 16.2 3,644.53. 22,499.43
ID-91 N 22,499.32 12.4 2,788.20 -
ID-92 _ 20,796.23 0.8 168.48 -
ID-93 N 15,993.30 19.9 3,174.94 15,993.30
ID-94 N 16,161.60 17.8 2,871.15 16,161.60
ID-95 N 24,417.35 12.3 3,010.85 -
ID-97 Y 36,459.67 26.5 9,652.61 36,459.67
ID-100 _ 14,015.93 100.0 14,015.93 14,015.93
ID-101 _ 48,067.72 61.5 29,583.37 48,067.72
TOTALS . d. x 49/S3 6893,758,OT 3,037,925.09 6,006,43212
-CENTAGES 68.25%" - s° g _ - 72.62%
APPENDIX F-2
1 i
APPENDIX G
BUT/FOR QUALIFICATIONS
But For Analysis
Current Market Value - Estimate $28,592,800
New Market Value - Estimate 210,500,000
Difference $181,907,200
Present Value of Tax Increment 15,468,323
Difference $166,428,877
Value Likely to Occur Without TIF is Less Than: $166,428,877
APPENDIX G-1
City of Eagan
Redevelopment Eligibility Assessment
Proposed "Cedar Grove"
Redevelopment Area
September 28, 2001
Prepared by:
Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH)
Butler Square Building, Suite 710C
100 North Oh Street
Minneapolis, MN 55403
City of Eagan
Cedar Grove Redevelopment Eligibility Assessments
September 28, 2001
PURPOSE
Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) was hired by the City of Eagan, Minnesota, to
survey and evaluate the properties within the proposed "Cedar Grove" Tax Increment
Financing District. This proposed district is located on both sides of MN Hwy. 13 east of
Cedar Avenue ( MN Hwy. 77). The purpose of our work was to independently ascertain
whether the qualification tests for tax increment eligibility, as required under Minnesota
Statute, could be met.
The findings and conclusions drawn herein are solely for the purpose of tax increment
eligibility and are not intended to be used outside the scope of this assessment.
SCOPE OF WORK
The proposed district consists of 88 property parcels comprised of the following types of
improvements: 14 single family residences, 48 commercial structures, 15 properties with
only parking improvements and 12 vacant properties without any improvements (one
parcel contains both a single family residence and a commercial structure).
EVALUATIONS
Of the sixty-three (63) buildings in the proposed district, fifty-four (54) building interiors
were evaluated. A total of nine (9) buildings were available for exterior evaluation only.
FINDINGS
Coverage Test - Sixty-eight (68) of the eighty-eight (88) properties met the coverage
test with a 72% area coverage. This exceeds the 70% area coverage requirement.
Condition of Buildings Test - Sixty (60) percent of the buildings - 38 of the 63
buildings - were found to be "structurally substandard" when considering code
deficiencies and other deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial
renovation or clearance (see definition of "structurally substandard" as follows). This
exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50% of buildings, not including
outbuildings, must be found "structurally substandard."
CONCLUSION
Our surveying and evaluating of the properties within this proposed Redevelopment
District render results that in our professional opinion qualify the district eligible under
the statutory criteria and formulas for Tax Increment Financing District Funding.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Summary report detailing the above findings.
2
1St
PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS
The properties were surveyed and evaluated in accordance with the following
requirements under Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (c) which
states:
Interior Inspection - "The municipality may not make such determination [that the
building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..."
Exterior Inspection and Other Means - "An interior inspection of the property is not
required, if the municipality fords that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain
access to the property; and after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party
that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable
conclusion that the building is structurally substandard."
Documentation - "Written documentation of the building findings and reasons why an
interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175,
subdivision 3, clause (1)."
PROCEDURES FOLLOWED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS
The City of Eagan sent letters to all property owners and tenants located in the district
requesting that an interior inspection and evaluation be made of their property. SEH
canvassed the proposed area during a two-week period at the end of July, 2001.
An interior inspection and evaluation was completed if consented to by the owner or
owner's representative. An exterior inspection and evaluation was made of the property
where either the owner refused interior access to their property or the scheduling of the
evaluation was not able to be coordinated with the owner within the time given for the
evaluations.
For all subject buildings, the City of Eagan collected a listing of all available building
permits on record, noting date issued and types of work completed for each permit. SEH
reviewed this list as well as several actual permits for a sample of buildings. Additional
building data was collected from public taxpayer information available from Dakota
County. Building data from these public records was combined with and reviewed
against information gathered in the field.
QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
The properties were surveyed and evaluated to ascertain whether the qualification tests
for tax increment eligibility for a redevelopment district, required under the following
Minnesota Statutes, could be met.
Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (a) (1) requires two tests for
occupied parcels:
1. Coverage Test - "parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are
occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or similar
structures
3
4
Note: The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under
Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (e) which states: "For
purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities,
paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15% of the area of the
parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other
similar structures."
2. Condition of Buildings Test - " and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not
including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial
renovation or clearance;"
Note: Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statute Section 469.174,
Subdivision 10, clause (b) which states: "For purposes of this subdivision,
"structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a
combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation,
fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions,
or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to
justify substantial renovation or clearance."
Structurally substandard is further defined in the statute under Subdivision 10, clause
(c) which states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance
with building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the
building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new
structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find
that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding
sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age
of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other
similar reliable evidence."
"Items of evidence that support such a conclusion [that the building is structurally
substandard] include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property appraisals or
housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable
evidence."
4
/0//
MEASUREMENTS AGAINST TECHNICAL TEST REQUIREMENTS
Coverage Test
The City of Eagan utilized a GIS (Geographic Information Systems) database, available
through Dakota County, to obtain individual parcel information. The GIS database
contains both graphic information (parcel and building shapes) and numerical data based
on county tax records. This information was shared with SEH for the purposes of this
assessment.
The total square foot area of each property parcel was obtained from county records
(GIS) and general site verification.
The total square foot area of site improvements on each property parcel was digitized
from recent aerial photography (Spring, 2001) and compared with county records
(building area) and general site verification.
The total percentage of coverage of each property parcel was computed to determine if
the 15% requirement was met.
The total area of all qualifying property parcels was compared to the total area of all
parcels to determine if the 70% requirement was met.
Condition of Building Test
Replacement Cost - the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type on
site:
R. S. Means Square Foot Costs was used as the industry standard for base cost
calculations. R. S. Means is a nationally published reference tool for construction
cost data. The book is updated yearly and establishes a "national average" for
materials and labor prices for all types of building construction. The base costs
derived from R. S. Means were reviewed, and modified if applicable, against our
professional judgement and experience.
A base cost was calculated by first establishing building class, building
construction type, and construction quality level (residential construction) to
obtain the appropriate Means cost per square foot. This cost was multiplied times
the building square footage to obtain the total replacement cost for an individual
building.
Building Deficiencies - determining technical conditions that are not in compliance with
current building code applicable to new buildings and the cost to correct the deficiencies:
On-Site evaluations - Evaluation of each building was made by reviewing
available information from city records and making interior and/or exterior
evaluations. On-site evaluations were completed using a standard checklist
format. The standard checklist was derived from several standard building code
5
~ T
plan review checklists and was intended to address the most common, easily
identifiable code deficiencies. Mechanical Engineers, Electrical Engineers, and
Building Code Officials were also consulted in the development of the checklist.
Deficiencies were generally grouped into the following categories (category
names are followed by its applicable building code):
• Building accessibility - Minnesota Accessibility Code
• Building egress, building construction - Uniform Building Code
• Fire protection systems - Uniform Building Code
• Food service - Minnesota Food Code
• Energy code compliance - Minnesota Energy Code
• HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) - Uniform
Mechanical Code
• Electrical systems - National Electric Code and Minnesota Energy
Code
Office evaluations - Following the on-site evaluation, each building was then
reviewed, based on on-site data, age of construction, building usage and
occupancy, square footage, and known improvements (from building permit data),
and an assessment was made regarding compliance with current mechanical,
electrical, and energy codes. A basic code review was also completed regarding
the potential need for additional egress (basement stairways, for example),
sprinkler systems, or elevators.
Deficiency Cost - Costs to correct identified deficiencies were determined by
using R. S. Means Cost Data and our professional judgement and experience.
Actual construction costs are affected by many factors (bidding climate, size of
project, etc.). Due to the nature of this assessment, we were only able to
generalize the scope of work for each correction; that is to say that detailed plans,
quantities, and qualities of materials were not possible to be known. Our
approach to this matter was to determine a preliminary cost projection suitable to
the level of detail that is known. This process was similar to our typical approach
for a cost projection that may be given to an owner during a schematic design
stage of a project.
Costs to correct deficiencies were computed for each building and compared to
the building replacement cost to determine if the 15% requirement was met. The
total number of buildings determined to be "structurally substandard" in this
manner was compared to the total number of buildings in the district to determine
if the 50% requirement was met.
6
/6_3
Technical Conditions Resources - the following list represents the current building codes
applicable to new buildings used in the Building Deficiency review:
1997 Uniform Building Code
MN 1341- Minnesota Accessibility Code, Chapter 1341 (1999)
2000 Minnesota Energy Code, Chapters 7672, 7674, or 7676
Minnesota Food Code, Chapter 4626 (1998)
1999 National Electric Code
1997 Uniform Mechanical Code
PROJECT TEAM:
Molly A. Olivier, Interior Designer
Jason P. Zemke, AIA, Project Architect
Nancy G. Schultz, AIA, Principal
7
~ r
amie Y_erbrugge
From: Jamie Verbrugge`.
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Patrick Hogan (E-mail)
Subject: Cable Television Interview - Mr. Hamiel
Pat,
Thank you again for making yourself and MAC staff available for our request to do a cable
television program focusing on the City of Eagan and its relationship to the airport. As I
mentioned, things have obviously changed significantly in the past 2 weeks.
As we discussed earlier, I would like to sit down with Mr. Hamiel for a Y.-hour interview for our
local access cable television. The interview would be conducted at the Burnsville-Eagan
Community Television studio at 4155 Old Sibley Mem Hwy (directions and map linked here -
MapQuest : Driving Directions Results The items that I would expect to cover will include:
• Effect on airport operations as a result of industry wide reductions in personnel and
operations; discussion to include increased safety and security measures
• Effect on MAC expansion projects, especially North-South runway
• Explanation of MAC finances, including bond ratings supported by revenues and taxing
authority; discussion of whether MAC could foresee utilizing tax authority to offset
revenue reductions or to preserve bond rating, and an explanation of financial
relationship with NWA and other carriers
• Current state of MAC noise program and discussion of MAC as national leader in noise
mitigation efforts
• Potential impacts on noise mitigation efforts
• Mr. Hamiel's role as president of ACI-NA
This will most likely be an "off-the-cuff" interview that follows the conversation. I would expect
that other issues might be raised, but the list above is more than sufficient for good discussion.
Also, as we discussed, I would like to be allowed some access to get background footage shots -
departing and arriving aircraft, construction of N/S runway and other project areas - to use for this
interview and future programming efforts.
Again, Pat, thank you for your efforts.
Jamie Verbrugge
Assistant City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
651-681-4603 (voice)
651-681-4612 (fax)
145-
CITY OF EAGAN
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT
SUBSTANDARD
DETERMINATIO SITE AREA COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE
ID CODE N (s.f.) % COVERAGE (s.f.) QUANTITY
ID-01102 N 723,054.72 77.51 560,412.32 723,054.72
ID-03 - 608,746.48 12.1 73,85820 -
ID-04 - 46,685.70 0.0 -
ID-05 - 67,010.41 4.0 2,698.17 -
ID-06 - 64,583.75 1.7 1,092.03 -
ID-07 - 801.91 0.0 .
1D-08 N 358,870.83 84.2 302,170.42 358,870.83
ID-09 Y 282,554.56 61.1 172,635.64 282,554.56
ID-10 Y 54,103.42 68.8 37,210.49 54,103.42
ID-11/12 N 828,802.97 18.5 118,18027 628,802.97
03.14 Y 29,466.50 75.8 22,326.93 29,466.50
ID-15 - 213,987.73 0.0 - -
ID-17 - 265,048.62 0.0 - -
ID-18 N 261,356.84 45.9 119,938.62 261,356.84
ID-20 Y 46,219.11 85.1 39,350.86 46,219.11
ID-21 N 43,602.19 100.0 43,602.19 43,602.19
ID-22 - 42,886.34 53.3 22,843.42 42,886.34
ID-23 - 8,326.69 100.0 8,326.69 8,326.69
03-24 N 56,171.74 77.9 42,980.88 55,171.74
ID-25 - 33,970.83 98.4 33,414.08 33,970.83
ID-26 N 58,236.53 81.9 47,709.01 58,236.53
ID-27 N 153,558.95 71.6 109,997.63 153,558.95
ID-28 - 6,003.22 17.0 1,022.00 6,003.22
ID-30 N 29,135.97 64.2 18,69527 29,135.97
ID-32 - 12,534.89 36.8 4,609.68 12,534.89
ID-33 - 12,004.58 0.0 - -
ID-34 Y 138,408.48 49.2 68,159.92 138,408.48
ID-35 N 27,353.69 68.6 18,754.03 27,353.69
10-37 N 20,250.69 72.7 14,714.65 20,250.69
ID-39 N 34,580.17 71.3 24,642.46 34,580.17
ID-40 N 525,082.40 83.8 439,882.01 525,082.40
ID-42 Y 37,742.72 56.1 21,160.69 37,742.72
10-43 - 8,972.22 100.0 8,972.22 8,972.22
ID-44 - 42,85721 0.0 - -
ID-45 - 2,907.61 100.0 2,907.61 2,907.61
ID-46 - 40,032.89 0.0 - -
1D47 - 2,76922 100.0 2,76922 2,769.22
ID-48 Y 7,536.10 100.0 7,536.10 7,536.10
1D-49 Y 4,016.52 100.0 4,016.52 4,016.52
ID-5o - 1,444.68 100.0 1,444.68 1,444.68
0-51 - 2,905.53 100.0 2,905.53 2,905.53
ID-52 Y 40,547.96 58.9 23,896.12 40,547.96
10-53 - 360.77 100.0 380.77 380.77
ID-54 Y,Y 26,805.96 100.0 26,605.98 2605.98
ID-55 Y 5,045.56 100.0 5,045.56 5,045.56
ID-56 Y 4,067.84 100.0 4,087.84 4,087.84
ID-57 N 44,339.18 38.5 17,081.24 44,339.18
ID-58 Y 29,598.66 64.0 18,954.72 29,598.66
W-59 Y,N 419,87295 26.1 109,621.26 419,872.95
1 T
CITY OF EAGAN
REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT
SUBSTANDARD
DETERMINATIO SITE AREA COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE
ID CODE N (s.f.) % COVERAGE (s.f.) QUANTITY
ID-60 Y 35,249.93 69.6 24,528.42 35,249.93
x-61 Y,Y 83,024.32 IWO 83,024.32 83,024.32
ID-62 Y 69,066.49 57.4 39,618.30 69,066.49
ID-63 N 17,785.62 89.4 15,894.28 17,785.62
ID-64 Y 9,647.09 54.6 5,265.74 9,647.09
9D-65 N 26,951.93 62.5 18,089.05 28,951.93
10-66 Y 12,386.34 77.4 9,585.55 12,386.34
ID-67 Y 19,000.04 87.2 16,565.47 19,000.04
ID-68 Y 24,819.D0 38.5 9,560.42 24,819.00
ID-69 Y 22,280.59 62.8 13,988.76 22,280.59
ID-70 Y 14,999.99 64.5 9,676.52 14,999.99
ID-71 N 43,573.01 28.6 12,458.69 43,573.01
1D-72 Y 30,106.60 74.0 22,274.60 30,106.60
ID-73 Y 77.538.16 13.3 10,344.43 -
ID-74 N 23,441.72 72.0 16,874.62 23,441.72
ID-75 Y,Y 73,435.49 31.0 22,756.35 73,435.49
ID-76 - 138,77198 3.4 4,767.26 -
1D-77 Y 28,749.96 56.9 16,344.72 28,749.96
ID-78 Y 31,176.92 55.3 17,234.23 31,176.92
1D-79 N 21,600.00 26.6 6,177.77 21,600.00
0-80 - 11,049.33 0.0 - -
ID-81 - 186,738.62 0.0 -
ID-82 - 11,248.88 0.0 -
ID-83 - 13,561.31 0.0 - -
ID-84 Y 30,79125 41.3 12,731.13 30,79125
ID-85 Y 18,963.49 12.5 2,377.34 -
ID-86 Y 18,963.86 26.6 5,049.38 18,963.86
ID-87 Y 18,963.89 23.5 4,465.02 16,963.89
ID-88 Y 22,499.41 18.9 4,244.30 22,499.41
ID-89 N 22,499.44 18.2 4,103.53 22,499.44
ID-90 Y 22,499.43 16.2 3,644.53 22,499.43
ID-91 N 22,499.32 12.4 2,788.20 -
ID-92 - 20,796.23 0.6 168.48 -
ID-93 N 15,993.30 19.9 3,174.94 15,99130
ID-94 N 16,161.60 17.8 2,871.15 16,161.60
ID-95 N 24,417.35 12.3 3,010.85 -
1D-97 Y 36,459.67 26.5 9,652.61 36,459.67
ID-100 - 14,015.93 100.0 14,015.93 14,015.93
ID-101 - 48,067.72 61.5 29,583.37 48,067.72
Y 12
6
KAREN E. MARTY
Attorney at Law
3601 Minnesota Drive Telephone: (952) 921-5859
Suite 880 e-mail: lanarty@ix.netcom.com
Bloomington, MN 55435 Fax: (952) 830-8211
September 21, 2001
Mayor and Members of the City Council
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council:
I represent Doris Dahline. As you know, she has been extremely upset at the prospect of
losing her house. She wants to remain there for the remainder of her life, even if she would not
be able to pass her home on to her children. She has undertaken a project a year, for 20 years, to
make her house and yard unique, valuable, and a wonderful place to live.
We do understand the City's desire to improve the Silver Bell Road / Highway 13
intersection, and to stimulate some redevelopment in the Cedervale area. However, extending
this project to Ms. Dahline's lot and house puts tremendous pressure on her. We have discussed
giving an Option to the City, which we believe would create a win-win situation, protecting both
the City and Ms. Dahline's interests. Specifically, the Option would include the following
concepts:
1. The City would contractually agree that, regardless of what is provided for in the
adopted TIF District and Redevelopment Plan, Ms. Dahline could remain in her
home without threat of condemnation, for the remainder of her life. (For this
reason, Ms. Dahline has been calling this a "life estate", even though that is not
the correct legal term.) Some restrictions necessary to protect Ms. Dahline and
the City would need to be included, such as:
a. If Ms. Dahline decided to move or sell the house, she would tell the City
first, and give the City the opportunity to purchase her property at a fair
price. Either the City or a developer of the City's choice could exercise
this option.
b. If the City (or developer) did not choose to purchase her property within
some specified time frame, and the City also did not choose to initiate
condemnation within that specified time frame, then Ms. Dahline could
sell the property to anyone of her choice.
C. So long as the house remains Ms. Dahline's primary residence, even if she
were forced to temporarily "reside" in a medical facility, the City would
not attempt to take Ms. Dahline's house by condemnation.
68' _
~ i
d. At any time the City may ask Ms. Dahline if she would be willing to be
condemned. If she declined, then the matter would be ended. If she
agreed in writing to be condemned, then the normal condemnation process
would be followed.
2. Upon Ms. Dahline's death, her estate would contact the City, and give the City the
opportunity to purchase her property at a fair price. Either the City or a developer
of the City's choice could exercise this option. If the City (or developer) chose to
purchase the property, but the City (or developer) and Ms. Dahline's estate could
not agree as to what would be a fair price, then the City would have the option of
condemnation. If the City (or developer) did not choose to purchase Ms.
Dahline's property within a specified reasonable time frame, then her estate could
sell it to anyone of its choice.
3. The wetland on and adjacent to Ms. Dahline's lot should be left unfilled and
undamaged at least until her property is sold. Normal wetland delineation may be
required to determine the precise outlines of this wetland, but the intention would
be to protect and preserve the existing wetland and its surrounding vegetation
(including the wooded area) in order to protect the habitat of the existing wildlife.
To actually accomplish these items, the City Attorney and I would need to work up some
legal language. However, we wished to present this proposal to the City and seek your approval
of the concept.
Thank you for your time. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Karen E. Marty
Attorney at Law
cc: Doris Dahline
Jamie Verbrugge
Michael G. Dougherty
X69 _ _
MEMO
City of Eagan
TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
CITY ATTORNEY DOUGHERTY
FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR VERBRUGGE
DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001
SUBJECT: CEDAR GROVE TIF/DAHLINE REQUEST FOR LIFE ESTATE
Attached is the copy of a letter provided by Ms. Doris Dahline, 3830 Alder Lane, from her
attorney regarding Ms. Dahline's interest in negotiating a life estate of her property.
As you are aware, Ms. Dahline's single-family residential property is proposed for inclusion in
the Cedar Grove Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District. Ms. Dahline has made
numerous appearances before the City Council and has had numerous correspondences and
conversations with City staff regarding her strong desire to be excluded from the Cedar Grove
redevelopment area.
The disposition of Ms. Dahline's issue is appropriately a policy decision of the City Council at
the time that they establish the boundaries for the Cedar Grove TIF District. Ms. Dahline
understands this and will be asking for such consideration at the Public Hearing on October 2,
2001.
There are several options that will be available to the City Council in regard to the Dahline
property and should be communicated to them in the likely event that a formal request is
presented to the Council prior to the October 2 Public Hearing:
• The Council may opt to keep the property within the redevelopment district. The recent
lot coverage analysis to qualify the redevelopment district assumes the inclusion of the
Dahline property.
• The Council may opt to carve the Dahline property, and/or any other property, out of the
proposed TIF District boundaries. As stated above, the qualifying coverage percentage
assumes the property is included. Further analysis will need to be conducted to determine
the impacts of removing the property and maintaining the statutory lot coverage
percentage to enact the district.
An additional issue of carving out the property is the potential impact to future
development proposals for the area. Eligibility restrictions for siting buildings around a
~ i
Cedar Grove TIF/Dahline Property
September 20, 2001
carved out parcel will likely require a plan design that avoids the property or utilizes it as
an outlot for parking or other supporting development needs. It is important to note that
removing the Dahline property from the TIF district at this time does not preclude the
property from being acquired in the future. It will limit the flexibility with which tax
increment may be applied to facilitate development.
• The Council may negotiate a life estate with the property owner. This is clearly the
preferred option expressed by Ms. Dahline. The life estate that is likely to be presented
by Ms. Dahline's attorney would be for the period of time that Ms. Dahline wishes to
remain on the property. This could have significant impacts on future development, both
in terms of limiting site plan flexibility and in creating potentially incompatible land uses
within close proximity of one another.
I spoke earlier today with Karen E. Marty, Attorney at Law, representing Ms. Dahline. We
discussed the best process for bringing this issue before the Council. It is my understanding that
Ms. Marty will submit a letter directly to the City Council requesting consideration of a life
estate for the Dahline property.
I would suggest that the options outlined above should be made available to the City Council for
their consideration once the formal request has been received. It would be appropriate to include
Council direction in the formal action to be taken on October 2 in regard to the proposed Cedar
Grove TIF District.
Please let me know if any additional information is required of you prior to October 2, 2001.
Assistant City Administrator
Copy: James D. Prosser, Ehlers & Associates
2
/7/
September 23, 2001
Dear Mayor and Council members,
As elected representatives of our City you make decisions on behalf of the citizens.
I have brought before you and talked about tangible things. Such as:
My being in the same home for 40 years and being a retired person
Having a beautifully maintained home
I have talked of road alignment
Wetland preservation and flooding & storm water issues.
Now I want to speak of the in-tangible Feelings and Stress.
I want to share something with you, but first I want to say, "I believe if we have
personally experienced something, we have a much better understanding of `it', and
therefore the choices or decisions we make about `it' are much wiser."
You will not have experienced what I have experienced, but if I tell you I' hand, you
may have a better understanding for decisions that you will make TODAY and in the
future.
I believe what I have been experiencing these past several months, is almost like the loss
of a loved one. The feelings of: Anger, Why me, Disbelief, Denial, to Give-up or to
Fight.
Early on I began to fantasize:
# 1. That I would throw myself in front of the bulldozer when you came. (I have
100 people that said they would join me since then).
# 2. That I would look at your individual homes, see which one I liked best,
bulldoze it - and I would build on YOUR lot.
# 3. Move my home, but it will cost you $1,000,000 to duplicate what I have.
Sometimes my dreams and fanaticizes mushed together.
In June I was still sitting in my bedroom crying.
In July a 57" angel came into my life and gave me encouragement and direction.
In August State Representative Tim Wilkin came to my home. Both he and Dakota
County Commissioner Nancy Schouweiler encouraged me, "to work with the City".
I continued to fantasize some
1. Put everything in storage and go to Sweden or India for a year.
2. Have the city give me a$], 000, 000 and I'll design and build another home.
3. Like my gir#~iend said, "Die and you won't have to worry about it"
That's `kinds' when 1 decided to survive. Even then, I wasn't sure 1 could survive another
crises in my life. [I have had several].
~ r
I have heard you say, "I know how you feel You do not know how I feel. To know how I
feel you must have empathy. When you are a senior citizen (and I hope you all live long
enough to have that privilege) and there is a new council that has complete control over
your destiny, then you will have empathy.
To quote Paul Bakken, "I'm for long term goals, such as; fostering independence in the
creation and retention of household wealth"
Question for Paul-
Is 24 years (1977 - 2001) long enough for me to be independent in the creation
(Preservation) & retention (Financial) of goals to keep my home/household wealth?
Surely after your statement and my proof of performance for over 24 years, you cannot
vote to allow my home to be vulnerable to condemnation.
The stress is horrendous - to feel powerless. I am consumed with thoughts of what-to-do.
I can no longer sleep through a night. I no longer ask for the logic of WHY
Why am I in the `District' now and the Highland and Liquor store are not?
In the Village Plaza Plan -Highlands and Liquor store are IN the Cedarl3/Redevelopment
Study and Langhoven is not.
Highlands and the Liquor store are centered in the business district - I am a mile away.
Highland and the Liquor store are at a major junction of Rahn Rd and Beau D'Rue - I am
on a `dead end' road.
My life is on `Hold'-
The Summer of 2001, I had planned to:
Resurface my driveway
Remove a sick evergreen ($400) Replace, $200
Trim 3 Ash trees in the front (the back 3 were done last year)
Continue development of perennial beds in Patio/Garden (1 or 2 beds each year)
Have lawn service aerate the grounds
Inside - Refinish all the window ledges in the house. I take on one major project each
year. (I refinished the ledges in the den and dining room before all this started).
NONE of these things were done. I can let this slip for one year, but I cannot continua ia.
this state of limbo for long. It is far too stressful! !
Added note:
For years my trees have been trimmed, fertilized, sprayed and root fed professionally by
S&S Tree and Horticultural Specialists. The lawn is fed and weed controlled by New
Frontier Lawn Care professionals - to care for the lawn, but also to protect the wetland.
There were almost 220 signatures on my submitted petition. For Paul's benefit - I did not
go door-to-door, these were all people that know me and care about me, my livelihood,
and my home situation. They would be here tonight, but I told them the City does not
have enough parking or enough room in these chambers to accommodate them.
In closing, I am asking your approval of a concept I have proposed through my lawyer.
I employ you to be sensitive to the people you represent.
Sincerely.
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
D. HARVEY'S HERITAGE ADDITION (LOT 3. BLOCK 1)
EASEMENT VACATION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and approve the vacation of public
drainage and utility easement on Lot 3, Block 1, Harvey's Heritage Addition, and authorize the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents.
FACTS:
• On August 23, 2001, City staff received a letter from Greg Yakovlev, requesting the vacation
of a portion of the existing drainage and utility easement on Lot 3, Block 1, Harvey's
Heritage Addition (1375 Braun Court).
• The easement was originally dedicated to the City as part of the Harvey's Heritage Addition
for drainage and utility purposes. The side lot easement is a standard plat dedication to
accommodate site drainage and possible future utility uses.
• The purpose of the request is to allow Mr. Yakovlev to keep an existing storage shed with a
portion that was inadvertently constructed into the drainage and utility easement. The request
would vacate only the portion of the existing easement needed to keep the shed in its current
place.
• City staff have been consulted, and determined that the location of the constructed shed will
not adversely affect the site drainage and current utilities, and have found this request to be in
order for favorable Council action.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map, page
• Legal Description/Easement, page
• Vacation Request Letter, page
~ r
Q
q LONE OAK ROAD DD u~ o,o
9-19-01 , D
4
Z
ZU r y
1~ $ Y "IAY Z
IL 8
Y
YANKEE DOqDLE ROAD YANKEE DOODLE ROAD c co. ao. m >
~D a °C~DD ~D
a Proposed Vacation
a Q Qo
0
WESCOTT RD.
WESCOTT ROAD
F-I
oo a
(00. RD 30) DIFFLEY ROAD
~D
Propo sement Vacation Location Map
arvey's Heritage 9-19-01
City of Eagan Lot 3, Block 1
L~~ J ULC~ k J e (,t tc~
Y ~
36 ,
NNI
Nr-
r Car,
• I /
Loo ,
I 0-7
! 3 7s Ew ~ Cj.
n
0
Commencing at the NE comer of Lot 3, Block 1, Harvey's Heritage I o
Addition, Dakota County, thence along the NE line of said Lot 3 a distance
of 13.00 feet, thence left 90 degrees a distance of 3.00 feet to the point of
beginning of the area to be vacated, thence continuing along said line a
distance of 2.00 feet, thence right 90 degrees a distance of 11.00 feet, thence
right 90 degrees a distance of 2.00 feet, thence right 90 degrees to the point
of beginning and there ending.
l
I Y
August 23, 2001
City of Eagan Council
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 55122-1897
Dear Eagan City Council,
This letter is to request a vacation of easement per the attached
petition.
The reason for the request is that I built a storage shed in such a
location as to save the 3 very mature trees in the adjacent area. I
even notched the shed to do so. However, I inadvertently infringed
on the easement by 23 inches. This is in such a location as to not
be seen by anyone as it is behind a fence built by my neighbor.
There are no utility lines found by Gopher State One on my rear
property line (digging #447316).
I respectfully request a variance to this easement.
Greg Yakovlev
1375 Braun Court
Eagan MN 55123
Ph (651)454-3059
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001
E. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NOS. 3(L 1 & 2, B 4) & 4(L 1-3, B 2)
EASEMENT VACATION
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and continue any action of the
vacation of public drainage and utility easements within Eagandale Center Industrial Park Nos. 3
& 4, until consideration of the Final Plat for Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 17.
FACTS:
• On August 1, 2001, City staff received a letter from Thomas Hodorff, Harry S. Johnson Land
Surveyors, representing 789 Company, requesting the vacation of the existing drainage and
utility easements on Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 and Lots
1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 as part of the re-platting of these
parcels.
• The easements were originally dedicated to the City as part of the plats in the Eagandale
Center Industrial Park for drainage and utility purposes. These easements were standard plat
dedications to accommodate site drainage and possible future utility uses.
• The purpose of the request is to allow 789 Company to re-plat the five parcels into two
parcels. New drainage and utility easements will be dedicated along the new lot lines when
the parcels are re-platted.
• The request would vacate the existing easements, avoiding future conflicts with underlying
easements.
• City Engineering staff have reviewed the request found it to be in order for favorable Council
action when the replacement easements are provided.
ISSUES:
• The final plat approval for the replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Eagandale Center Industrial
Park No. 3 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 has not been
scheduled for Council consideration yet. It would be appropriate for the approval of the
easement vacation to occur concurrently with the final plat approval at a future date.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Location Map, page.
• Legal Description/Exhibit, page
• Vacation Request Letter, page
78'
i 1
F3W
Q
INTERSTATE 494
LKJ
8
9-19-01
Cq
Proposed Vacation
a
UDW ow RoAn LONE OAK ROAD
TRUNK
4 Ab. SS
~ Q
Z a
o
C7 Y W Z 3
J o
4 U
~AYL
J
J
i
U
W
W Y YAru
YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (co. RD. 28 RD.
DR. D
s
DucKrooD oR.
pa 31
a S
0
c-~
J
WESCOTT ROAD
1C5?J J~ \J II xr r.~\~l r
Proposed Ease nt/Right-of-Way Vacation
Location Map 9-19-01
City of Eagan Eagandale Center Indust. Park No. 3 & 4
Schedule A
Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 4, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO 3,
Dakota County, Minnesota and South half of adjoining vacated Apollo Road.
And
Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 2, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 4,
Dakota County, Minnesota
Schedule B
Vacate drainage and utility easements within Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 4,
EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3, Dakota County, Minnesota
as dedicated on said plat.
And
Vacate drainage and utility easements within Lots 2, 3, Block 2, EAGANDALE
CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 4, Dakota County, Minnesota as dedicated on
said plat.
i i
X
A `1/\I 1 )P1 ~ b•I". 1 t_V P\, \/L.L. t/ I'\V/1y
N 07SS1- I moo 1 L. V VL.I. V r\\/I1V f j
k UITIUTY SEMENT
EAGANDALrCENTER
USTRIAL PA K NO. 3
A A ^ 1^ ` SCALE: 1 = 1001
f-A
L'A
%)I A
a.VT 1 ^L.
i
l` ^ * JJ' \ / \n \
v~l ~ ~Ji►1 \ a.vT ~
c `
1
\1
~ 1 /
CA-xzsvr r /
351.97 1
R-570.00
DRAINAGE Ac UITILITY EASEMENT
PER PLAT, EAGANDALE CENTER o
I \ INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 4
\ 1 /1T
\ l.V 1 i
I \
1
I I
1 - N e9'267e w 2137
- 1
t3-I61-201 3: 18PM FROM HARRY S JOHNSON CO 612 884 5344 P.2
HARRY S. JOHNSON
LAND SURVEYORS
Bruce Allen
Engineering Department
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, Minnesota 55122
Re: Petition to vacate drainage and'utility easements located in a portion of Eagandale
Center Industrial Park No. 3 and Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4.
Dear Bruce,
Representing 789 Company in the replatting process of a parcel of land (Schedule A) in the
City of Eagan, we have been requested by the City to submit, a Petition to Vacate, for the
vacation of drainage & utility easement found in the referenced parcel. The legal
descriptions of easements to be vacated are shown in, Schedule B.
Presently the parcel lies in two existing plats, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 and
Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4. Our intention is to replat subject property into a
single two-lot plat. The proposed plat has been submitted to the City of Eagan planning
department and it is our intent to rededicate drainage and utility on the new plat as
requested by City.
Any questions concerns or additional requests please contact our office.
Thank you,
Thomas E. HHarry S. Johnson Co., Inc.
170 West 79"' Street
Bloomington, MN 55454
tele (952)884-5341
fax (952)884-5344
e-malt; tom@hsjsurVey0rS.com
(Y I
t l
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
F. PROJECT 748, JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD
STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the final
assessment roll for Project 748 (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Street & Utility
Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 748 provided for the extension of new street and utility improvements for
Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Diffley Road (County Road 30) to Deerwood Drive to
serve the 117 acre Oakbrooke Addition by Pulte Homes of Minnesota, in central
Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report.
• The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on August 21, 2001, with
a public hearing originally scheduled for September 17 to formally present the final
costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties.
The public hearing was continued to the October 2 meeting due a typographical error
in the published notice regarding the original hearing date.
• The final assessments are approximately 0.1% more than the estimate contained in
the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on December 15, 1998.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to the affected property
owners. As of this date, the City has not received any objections to the proposed
assessments.
• As part of the development contract for the Oakbrooke Additions, Pulte Homes of
Minnesota has signed a waiver of objection to the levy of special assessments
associated with Project 748.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, page./Vthroughfiq.
/8.3
FINAL ASSESSMENT DARING
PROJECT HEARING DATES
NUMBER - Project 748 ASSESSMENT - October 2, 2001
NAME - Johnny Cake Ridge Road IMPROVEMENT- December 15-1998
Utility and Street Installation
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED
F.R.=Feasiblity Report
FINAL F.R FINAL F.R
RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS
SANITARY STORM SEWER
SEWER
❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk
0 Lateral 679.44 776.57 /Lot 0 Lateral
Oakbrooke
Properties 997.35 867.99 Lot
❑ Service Properties South of
Diffley .087 .076 S9 Ft
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
WATER STREET
❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base
❑ Lateral 0 Johnny Cake 900.04 887.58 /Lot
❑ Service
® Turn Lanes 277.99 133.93 /Lot
® Lat. Benefit/wink 353.41 24.86 /Lot
❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv.
® Trail/Sidewalk 84.41 64.54 /Lot
SERVICE PAIRS STREET LIGHTS
® Water and Sanitary 0 Installation N/A 115.57 /Lot
Sewer 64.64 95.64 /Lot
❑ Energy Charge
CONTRACT NO. OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY
NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED
$1,130,965 F.R. $564,125 F.R.
99-05 171 15 Years 7.00% $1.138.934.69 $410,994.44
COMMENTS:
~ t
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall, Financial Consultant
DATE: August 3, 2001
SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll, Project 748
Johnny Cake Ridge Road Extension
The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on December 15, 1998 ordered Project 748. According
to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and or assessed: sanitary sewer lateral,
water main, storm sewer lateral, trunk storm sewer, turn lane, trail and street improvements. In the feasibility
report, it was proposed to assess the storm sewer improvements using linear and area methods of assessment.
Properties south of Diffley Road were proposed for assessment using an area method of assessment. The area
method of assessment was used in the preparation of this assessment roll. All other improvements were proposed
for assessment using a linear method. Because this improvement was petitioned for by the developer of the
Oakbrooke Subdivisions this assessment roll is prepared using a unit method of assessment not the linear method
proposed in the feasibility report. The construction of the improvement was accomplished under Contracts No. 99-
05, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for September 17, 2001. The following information
was used in the preparation of the assessment roll.
1. PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $1,054,112.20 paid to the contractors for the construction of the
following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of. engineering, design, contract management,
inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $495,816.93 were incurred resulting in an
improvement and project cost of $1,549,929.13. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These
other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and
the assessment rate.
Construction Other Improvement Feasibility
Improvement Cost Costs Cost Report
Sanitary sewer lateral $ 144,633.80 $ 68,030.60 $ 212,664.40 $243,065
Water main 116,105.90 54,612.09 170,717.99 233,300
Service pairs 13,759.10 6,471.79 20,230.89 29,935
Trunk storm sewer 60,655.10 28,530.00 89,185.10 68,500
Lateral storm sewer 272,229.60 128,047.14 400,276.74 348,880
Street 336,821.17 158,428.71 495,249.88 544,838
Street-turn lanes 73,971.63 34,793.63 108,765.26 52,400
Bituminous trail 35,935.90 16,902.97 52,838.87 40,400
Traffic control signal 195,200
Streetlights 36,172
Total $1,054,112.20 $495,816.93 $1,549,929.13 $1,792,690
2
14FS---
II. ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
The properties affected by this project were charged for sanitary sewer and water trunk improvements through prior
public improvement projects. Trunk storm sewer is being collected using the connection charge ordinance.
B. UTILITY LATERAL AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS
1. Sanitary Sewer Lateral Improvement
Sanitary sewer laterals were installed beneath Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The laterals are extensions of laterals
previously installed in Diffley Road and Deerwood Drive. The construction cost was $144,633.80. Other costs in
the amount of $68,030.60 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and assessable
cost of $212,664.40 to the benefited parcels. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed
using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed
in the following manner:
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$212,664.40 313 Units $679.44/Unit
2. Water-Main Improvement
A 12 inch DIP water main with appurtenances and a pressure reducing station was installed beneath Johnny Cake
Ridge Road. The water main was extended from Diffley Road to Deerwood Drive. The construction cost was
$116,105.90. Other costs in the amount of $54,612.09 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an
improvement cost of $170,717.99. The feasibility report called for an 8-inch equivalent to be assessed. The 8 inch
equivalent cost was computed using the following:
Improvement Cost $116,105.90
Less
2,840 Lineal Feet 8-inch DIP to 12-inch DIP 6.20/L. F. 17,608.00
1 each 16" X 8" wet tap vs 16" X 12" tap 100.00 ea 100.00
7 each 8" GV. Vs 12" BV 186.00 ea 1,302.00
4365 lbs Fittings for 8" vs 12" 1.00/lb 4,365.00
1 each Pressure reducing station $17,500.00 ea 17,500.00
8 in equivalent cost 75,230.90
Add other costs @47.04% 35,385.94
8 inch eqivalent portion $110,616.84
3
1,~6
1 1
The feasibility report proposed the assessment to the abutting property using a linear method. A unit method will
be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner:
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$110,616.84 313 Units $353.41/Unit
The water main improvement costs that are not assessed are to be financed by the City's Water Trunk Fund.
3. Water and Sanitary Sewer Pairs Improvement
12 water and sanitary sewer pairs were installed in bubble cul-de-sacs that extend from Johnny Cake Ridge Road.
The service pairs are extended from the water and sanitary sewer laterals that were installed with this project. The
construction cost for the service pairs was $13,759.10. Other costs in the amount of $6,471.79 were allocated to the
construction costs. This results in an improvement and assessable cost of $20,230.89 to the benefited parcels. The
feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be
used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner:
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$20,230.89 313 Units $64.64/Unit
4. Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements
The trunk storm sewer improvements consist of the outlets to Ponds BP-35, BP-35.1 and BP-25. The construction
cost was $60,655.10. Other costs in the amount of $28,530.00 were allocated to the construction costs. This results
in an improvement cost of $89,185.10. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be financed by the
City's Storm Sewer Trunk Fund.
5. Storm Sewer Lateral Improvement
Storm sewer lateral improvements were installed with Johnny Cake Ridge Road to provide street drainage and also
to serve as extensions for developer installed storm sewer. Storm sewer installation from CBMH-104 to BP-35 was
oversized to handle flow from south of Diffley Road to Pond BP-35. The construction cost was $272,229.60. Other
costs in the amount of $128,047.14 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and
assessable cost of $400,276.74 to the benefited parcels. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be
100% assessed using linear and area methods. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The unit
assessment rate computed in the following manner:
Storm Sewer Lateral Construction Cost $272,229.60
Less
Costs associated with over sizing from
CBMH-104 to BP35 59.922.10
Storm Sewer Construction Cost $212,307.50
Add other costs @47.04% 99,861.91
Improvement Cost-Unit Method $312,169.41
4
16,
;2
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$312,169.41 313 Units $997.35/Unit
The area assessment rate computed in the following manner:
Storm Sewer Lateral Construction Cost $272,229.60
Less
Storm sewer costs for unit method 212.307.50
Costs associated with over sizing from
CBMH-104 to BP35 $59,922.10
Add other costs @47.04% 28,285.23
Improvement Cost-Area Method $88,107.33
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$88,107.33 1,013,438.4 Sq. Ft. $.086939/Sq. Ft.
6. Johnny Cake Ridge Road Street Improvement
Johnny Cake Ridge Road was built to a 36-foot width with transitions for right turn, left turn and thru lanes at the
intersection of Diffley Road and right turn and thru lanes at the intersection of Deerwood Drive. The construction
cost was $336,821.17. Other costs in the amount of $158,428.71 were allocated to the construction costs. This
results in an improvement and cost of $495,249.88. The feasibility report called for a Residential Street Equivalent
to be assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The over sizing
costs will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. The assessment rate was computed in the following
manner:
Street Construction Cost $336,821.17
Less
Over Sizing Street Costs-Cross-Section 137,426.62
Striping 6,551.30
Signal conduit 1.250.00
$191,593.25
Add other costs @47.04% 90,125.46
Residential Equivalent Improvement $281,718.71
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$281,718.71 313 Units $900.04/Unit
5
I T
7. Turn Lane Improvements
Right and left turn lanes on Diflley Road and Deerwood Drive at their intersection with Johnny Cake Ridge Road
were required as a condition of development. The construction cost was $73,971.63. Other costs in the amount of
$34,793.63 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement cost of $108,765.26. The
feasibility report called for 80% of this improvement cost to be assessed using a linear method. A unit method will
be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner:
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$108,765.26 X.8 313 Units $277.99/Unit
8. Trail Improvement
Bituminous trails that are 8 feet wide were constructed on the east and west side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The
construction cost was $35,935.90. Other costs in the amount of $16,902.97 were allocated to the construction costs.
This results in an improvement cost of $52,838.87. The feasibility report called for 50% of this improvement cost
to be assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate
was computed in the following manner:
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE
$52,838.87 X.5 313 Units $84.41/Unit
C. ASSESSMENT TERMS
The assessments are proposed for a term of 15 years as was proposed in the feasibility study. The interest rate is
7.0% per annum on the unpaid balance.
III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY)
IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY
IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY)
Sanitary sewer lateral $212,664.40 $212,664.72 $32
Water main 170,717.99 110,617.33 (60,100.66)
Service pairs 20,230.89 20,231.60 .71
Trunk storm sewer 89,185.10 (89,185.10)
Lateral storm sewer 400,276.74 400,277.32 .58
Street 495,249.88 281,712.52 (213,537.36)
Street-turn lanes 108,765.26 87,010.87 (21,754.39)
Bituminous trail 52,838.87 26,420.33 (26,418.54)
TOTAL $1,549,929.13 $1,138,934.69 ($410,994.44)
6
8~
The City's responsibility will be financed by transfers from the following City Trunk Funds.
Trunk Fund Amount
Water $60,100.66
Storm Sewer 89,185.10
Major Street 261,710.29
Total $410,996.05
Gerald R. Wobschall
Reviewed R 'ew
;F O - M44~~ 4!L
Public Works Department Finn epartment
~4Z8, (
Dated g'Z~ ~o l
Dated
cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Daugherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
7
9
T
w p C V M M N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
pp pp ~~pp p ff~~1 Q~pp X1`"'11 N NNN N
JJw -5 ANOnaD MMcnm DMMM~MMMCpMMMBMMMN In MMMBMMMMMMMM MMMMV)cn
V M M OO MnAA NnnI~MAhh hr nO1~hnMP, r- r- A Ann Onn 1~nA r:nA1: A/: A1~nAhAI~
Of cnaO~OOOaDOOO W OOOOOO OOOCDOOO~OOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
r
C') @~ O - - fDv M v - CDv v ~..r v r. - .r
O O v v
a'
LLZ~
J
} N ~ eQ-f~f W NO~ttp~ppp ltttOW[pppf 0101 W V W O1 W ~iA~O1~~ W W W W In 010101 ~ W W O1~° O1 ~iA iAWW ~O?~0/O1 W W W W W
W JO m cm 9)Y.- P- C4 C4 C-4 N
cr) en In M C.) In cn 11 In m m a a fV fV V
w
or
LL O p 0
r O_m N W W _W ~N <V NaDNNN1nNNN~NNN SNNNALV NNQNNNNBNNtV NNNN It
N N
F O ^ C4 co ^5~ n C14 CD A t. P. 1- n n A
1(n~ 1A~ ~nj 1(n~ 1h~ 11~~ h yh~ f ~ 1h1 1 ~ n 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ A 1 ~
1n~ g 1.- 1~ 1h~ 1W~ I A P, 11, O P, 11.- I, fop r- P. n W P- 1- A ~ (A7 1 O A
f+l l'l er1 M eel fn cq V) V) I~ cn 0) c~ cq
W 8 r- C4 R M tiS i$ N e+f k e`C6 Vi Vi C6 C6 C6 Vi r- (6 Vi C6 7 t9 t'7 th e~f i i~ 8 M e7lh i~ t+f aD 1+l vi f7 V; Vi V; ri
In, R 0l. .
g N O 8
o
0.
a
va~aY. lnee•iagav vv:ree~aavvavvaq
" 88888888 In:;:;:;!R a~:rve$a 1
11 N N
011
O I&
11
a an
F N tp p pp pppppppO~ Wp W Cp~ p~pp pp Wp1 WW W~I ~~pp WpI WW p yy WQ1 0~ pp~ WW WW W yW Wy Cn Oy~
~~0~~8~iA Op~~~O~~OD W CD <A~iA W iA~
N aD 00000000 W W iA~O1~OD~070?iA OMC~0/01801~~~01 W ~NCR
II OOOOOOOOPhn~1~nA Ann W A n A C h n An n AA mA h r- A O A A A n n A A n P I: Ann r- r.- l`hA
.1a II P, An AnA NIA nr- Ann AAA 8 p AnnA 1-nA/A nnAAAAAnAAAA nnAnnA
Q 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
o Z II
a' 11
J 0-
~8~3g~Sg88~~~
8;8 8.3. ~i88888888~g88~~~gS.S.S. a. 848880333a8ggags.
a 11 ~
F' U u ~1 IN+1
O Z II ~
to U
C4 to C4 co ~ a u
<a ii `41n'°'~Ofifi$IQo'i$88i~y$yi$i$Pa 888°$8i$y§i$i$8WNWfy888°8888i~ai~i$i$8i$$8i$i$8i$i$8
II N N N N l0 M P/
O a' 11
N a
N If
p p p p p p p p p y a '~pp ~~++11 p a p e~ a a y a a a s y
11 Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ aD ib a a a N y S . . ~ CCpD . a . . iy0 0 t0 . ~ OD (O CD aD OD aD . CD OD . ~
OZ N y00000000 Y O~ 7sa-sa1Dga3 t0°l aspay-sasssas saaaaa aIs asses
U) a' 11 $ iD ~D ~D
I
U) a
3 11
" 8888888SaZ:;R! vc"~Yaa~:►va8•i<anaavI~evaa8avavva~v~vava<avvv
Q II nGOG GOCO01'f M 1e)'~ en f7 e'> W 0) eu'~7 Oe7 M) M14 0 ~
14
Y 11 AAA A iq 10
n O Z 11 00 ~
~ a ii
3 n
g8YY~333
IIm88888888S83Spgp$3X833~XOf
d N CVOOOOOOOOrA r rE0An W ^ ° r r nN(M AAAO 0^a a QmCA n WA AOCD 'm ^^Q
11 co m ID to mco n 10 m co 01DAID m Coco <CD OCAVOW O 0000000wo0 c occ( mwo
L) IM
O 2 u N N
F
J a N
m u
w
88
SS og
N cc
v♦ air
Q M M
WW QQw[ww yw~Y~[C Ill Ill ww Ill wvy7~ y7Ill IyY,~lllGlIll 7wwr~wY w L*yU 7vyw~ Ill y*w[~.LU w 7yW w-wIll Ill Ill Ill Ill Illll 7Yyw~wIllll IllllIll w Ill w I7}Ill Ill wIll Ill
Ill Ill Ill U.1
N~ NN N~ ~ 7575 C.J V (.7U ~tlU~V U~ V UU VUUCJ~U~~~~~ V ~ V CJ~ VCl V ~CJ~V V~~~~/ V V l7
5 5 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
wwwwww~
N N N N in ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
m O n If7 A H H h HH n IA n IC1 IA N Y7 IA M HUNS N
9 C4
9H jjj
LU SESSS co co
Q N e Ae~~ n n n n n A A n n n A A n n n n A A n A n e nd n n A n A I. n n A n A n A n A n
ddooddgo-ododddoddddddoooooooddodododoooodooddod--- 0 c
I
W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N~y O
J W Mclq l7 V1 !+f q-ciclcll7q Pf co e'e7 MQ7 ~e7 co roe? /h MOf N~~yyNNN N N N N N N~~pppp OOpp poppooppppO o
P'f Pl PS Pl l'O !+f l+7 P1 0) Of M P/1Cl Ot G1 01 O D/ O Ol Ol O/ Q p
U AAAAAAfAnn1~1- 1- ri,h1~1~Anh~AAhl~nh/~1~A1~nnhA-nPnARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRt~
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N
0 ~
tai 2
O O~~~ IC m~ ID ro m m ro~~ 1 p~~~ c p m a p~~ c D~ m a D m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m
a D (O tO .
r va0aeaa<Oaaeea0avaavvv V eevOYOOOO V OO~I of vo0 aD n~er~~n°nD e°+Ae+°n~ermy t°+nt+°n~
Wm0 lN~1~PNftNieNfeN+llN7~MMMMMmI+NltN9MC0,4m mlN7lN7C.))l+NftN7MPN'f A MCl) C+NfMM(M,, MC, e~t ehie eot eolhrfaf
a2CL
Ill
d'
LL
01
~
f` A A n f: A A A h h A A n h h h r-r- r- ~ h I. I, h ~ h t- /r- I, N N P. 1, r- 1- N f, h h 1, h h N 1,
w~t~~ic~t~e~e~e~+ t+~ehic~t~e~v~r~t~t~t~t~ehie~t~e~+e~r~e~r~t~e~t~+ e~e~e~ie~e~e~t~e~e~e~e~c~r~e'ten
68 Cd C6 C6 C6 C6 ci C6 cli ri vi vi C6 C6 vi C6 C6 0i vi vi vi vi vi V) m vi C6 m C4 C6 V) V) C6 C6 C6 C6 C6 vi vi vi vi vi vi vi vi V6 C6 vi ri vi vi 6 6 C6 M C.) 4"
~r
IL
ii a:r.iveavavvaevavv~~.i~vaavaa~iva~~~~eiv~eaaaaav•iaeaeavvaca e
~a ° ~a~a~~ag~~~aga~a~~~~aga~a~a~~a~a~ag~~~~ag~a~aga~~a$aga~a~~~~ag~ag~a~aga~a~agag~~ag~a~~a~
~ U 11
Oz
u
i ra
a
r n
11 h h P ri h h n IA h n IA n n A A A A A A A A A A A P" A N* A h n A P P A A n A A P--' A n A A A A A^ n n n A n n
J 11 A A A A A n n n A n A n A A A A A A A A A n A n A A A n n n n n n A A A A A n A A n A A A A A PIN A n A n A n A
U„ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Oz"
r d' It
J d 11
r 11
g83~3$gggB. .S$gSSgg3. g8g8g88S3S3$.BgSgSg83.88gSgS3gg8g~8
o z
a
ii e~ e~ e~ e~ t~ e+~ ehi ehi a thi ehi r~ Ciii (ii e~ rmi e~. . . . . (i . C ~i, c~
11 /v r~ A A n A A A A A n A n n n A A A n n n n n n n n n n n A A A A A A n A n n n A A A A n n n A n n n n n A A
r C u
au
ii
a _ 11
U r U ii
Oz
U) r a ii
iiavevvvvavvavvice+aaaeaveaavaaav~rveevv~e~ava~~~~~a~va~veev
oZ
-
(L
~ a
3 if
6aa0"igigimaagiaacim gi a44 ci oi6a 4a44 4 giWgi"ics "ia6~ agigi.gia"igi~44
U
n A n n n A A F, A P, A n A I, m n A n n A A n A n A n A A A A A A A A A A A P6 A 1 D A OD it A A A n A
Q It m m m m m m m m m 10 m m m m m m m Amm m m m Am m m mm nm m m t O mA 1- Am m mm A No m m m m No m m m t O m m m Q D m m m
OZa
a
N a
z►=rf-rrrr~ttttLt~ttt~ttttttttttttttttttPttrtrrrtttrr-rrtrrr
W W W W W W W W W w w W W W W W w w w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Will W W W W W W W W W W W W
m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m lD m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0l m m t0 m m m m m m m m m m
000 00000 00000000 000000000000000000000000000
N N t7 N t7 th HIMMI N t7 M M N 0 N m 9 29
;g R 91 WZ44444NN24 _
~aj W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N lV N N N N N N N N
~ A~ n n A n n r A~ A~^ A A^ A^~ n n r A~ A A~^ A~^ A A~ A n~ n n A r~ A~ n A r r r A r n A~~ n
aaooaaao ao as
i r
Luj
w 8$$$$$$$88$88$$8$$$$$$$8$$$$$$$$8$$$888$88$8$88$$$88$$$$
fld) ~RRRR~RRRRRR£~RRRRRRR~~RRRl~RR~ZRt~RRR~RRRRRRRRRS~R~RRRRRRRRR
oQ~
LL <
LL Z >
2
m m _m m m m m m m m m m m m m _m _m m m m m_ m m m m m m m m m m _m _m m _m m m m m_ m m _m m m m m m m _m m m m m m m _m
a0 O CO a0 aG a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 aG CO a0 a0 a0 a0 ap a0 a0 a0 a0 m IC "OP a n0 00P I m m ao aC aC ao ao aC aC ao aC ao a0 m a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 m a0 a0 a0
AAnrnnnAAAAAnnnA~AAnnr~AAn~~AAAn~n~Anrnnrn~~nnn~rnnAr
Wa-pp `c~colnARARr Ar&,)c"li`2ie` 2
a~w
a
LL
pppp Q~pp pppp Q~pp ~~pp ~~pp
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
I~ n h h A 1~ A 1~ A A IA n r 1~ r^ f` n~ A A h h f` h h h h h h n r h 1~ h r r 1~ 1~ n I{ n~ 1~ A n 1~ 1~ n 1~ ~ A 1~ A
w~ c~e~c~t~it+~ l ~i RRig R R R R R R R R R R ~"R RRRRR RRRRR emnrmie+M9t g
M M M M C6 c6c6 vi C6 C6 v; C6 V6 06 vi c6C6 ci vi C6 C6 Ili C6
CL
N< a~ Y v V< a a a R V ~i:r a ~ v ~ e e~ v e a e~ a v v f f f f f f f f a e a a v e~ v ~ s v a v a v a v a a
F U u
OZ_°
J ~ a' 11
a
b p~ Q1
.Q.1 a 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O Z II
CL N
H n
°Ix
a
U) u
e~ c~ r~ e~+ e~+ c~+ chi e~+ lc~ chi chi 10 A A A A m
en
-j a ii 888888888888888gu'a8888888888885/'~'n88~'a8888~1'~'888888~'n888~n'88888
H U i
y a
rn u
U ~ U ii
OZ
y ~ per, ii
3
e v v a v v v v v v v a v a v e v v a v a a e a v e v v v a a v v a e e v a e v v v e a a a a a a e v
Y O Z ii
~ a
11
11 CD CDdQ~~~~ ~ C7i0001~~~QI~~QQ QIQ CD~~~OI Ol QCD ClQ~ W O/ W W W OjQ~~ ~~~~Q~QO ~Ol~ Q O1
a 11 A r n n n n r r n n n A I, A A A n A A A A A A n n A A A A r A r A n n n r n A A A n n n n r n A A P, A A A
H U 11 o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m to o mo m m m m m m m m m m m m 00000 m m m m m m
Z-
IL
VJ N
w Z Z $ Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z z z $ z$ Z Z Z Z Z z
Z~~~1_-~f-~-~►-~~~~-F-HHHHHFHHHI-FHFHHHHHFHH!_~FF-fFI-f-F~~-~~~~~F_►=~~~
Zxxsxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxsxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
O v v v~ v a v a e v a~ a v v a< a a a~ v v e a a a a a~ a a~ e a e v v a a v e v a a a e a v a e a a a a v
wwwwwwwwwIwwwwwwwwwwIwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwIwwwwwwwwwww
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
In 1lf N fn N fn 1(1 N /n N /n IA N fn ~ N M I N N N 1n N N IfI N
$ O m m m I- m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n n n
N n n r r n r n r r A A A A A A A A n r A n n n n A r r r n r n n A n n A n n A n 'N
A A n A r A
A r r
cn fn fn In In fn cn en of to ' to to
a~`v~"~v3`I~ n"r3 c"31"~`~' u"~ U'? ~to
00 o~doo d^'doo~
I
W s a g s
a
laiz>
ao~
OOD
~o
7 7
f I, CID a of)
wma
w
C
IL 8
LL
p
N N N m
a
°g ~ U 11
C R
Q d 11
H N Q Q Q
11 Af`O
a II N 'N N O
F- U H OD
a u Y a a
i i 8O O O8 N
p O z 11 m ~ ~ ~
N
it
(A 11
.1~ i; ~p p~p~a n
Qa 11 OD OI OI N
It
O Z 11
/n d ii
(Al N
Ja d II ~ ~ ~ N
V ~ U ° Ri
Oz
y ~ a
11
a°R"'Eg
~ aN
3
~a ii mmm~
N
ag ir It
aN
to N
W
°sss
D~av
WWW
c w
mma0
00~
US C4 C4
O m A
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
G. PROJECT 797, LETENDRE 1ST & 2ND ADDN - STREET OVERLAY
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the final
assessment roll for Project 797 (Letendre 151 & 2nd Additions - Street Overlay) and
authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 797 provided for the bituminous overlay of the streets within the Letendre V
& 2°d Additions, including Letendre Street, Heritage Lane and the Donald Avenue
cul-de-sac, in northwest Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report.
• The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on September 4, 2001,
with a public hearing scheduled for October 2 to formally present the final costs
associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. The
final assessments are approximately 22% less than the estimate contained in the
feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 20, 2001.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property
owners (46 single-family, 1 commercial/ industrial, and 5 high density residential
properties) informing them of this public hearing. A neighborhood meeting prior to
this Final Assessment hearing was not held due to the reduction in assessment from
the original estimated amounts and the low attendance (2 people representing 2
properties) at the initial project neighborhood meeting in February. No objections
have been received to date.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, pages through;?
.
i
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT HEARING DATES
NUMBER - 797 ASSESSMENT - October 2, 2001
NAME - Letendre 1st Addition IMPROVEMENT - February 20.2001
Mill and Overlav
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED
F.R.=Feasiblity Report
FINAL F.R FINAL F.R
RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS
SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER
❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk
13 Lateral ❑ Lateral
❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
WATER STREET
❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base
❑ Lateral ® Surfacing
Single 458.95 654 /Lot
❑ Service High Density Resi 6.42 6.76 /F_F.
C/I 8.55 9.02 /F_F.
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv.
❑ Trail/Sidewalk
SERVICES STREET LIGHTS
❑ Water & San Sewer ❑ Installation
❑ Energy Charge
CONTRACT NO.OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY
NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED
$46,360 F.R. $62,360 F.R.
01-01 52 5 Year 7.00% $36.232.67 $77,834.47
COMMENTS:
t
city of eagan MEMO
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall
DATE: March 21, 2001
SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll Project No.797
Letendre 1st Addition
Street Overlay
The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on February 20, 2001 ordered Project 797.
According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed.
The improvements are mill and overlay of existing streets and replacement of curb and gutter. In the
feasibility study, it was proposed to assess the improvements using a lot unit method for single-family
properties, and linear methods for other property types. This assessment roll is prepared using the methods
presented at the public hearing. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract No.
01-01, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 2, 2001. The following
information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll.
I. PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $87,735.43 paid to the contractor for the construction of the
following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management,
inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling in the amount of $26,331.71 were
incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $114,067.14. The detail of these other costs is
provided on Schedule I and they are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the
cost of each improvement.
CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY
IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT
Street resurfacing $52,346.43 $15,710.54 $68,056.97 $80,690
Curb repair 35,389.00 10,621.17 46,010.17 28,030
TOTAL $87,735.43 $26,331.71 $114,067.14 $108,720
2
n;?
H. ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in
this assessment roll.
B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
1. Street Overlay
The cost of the street overlay improvement was computed using the following unit prices and quantities:
UNIT EXTENDED
- - -
- - --i - ITEM-------------------------- --UNIT QTY PRICE - COST
Moblization LS. 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00
Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 6,020 .78 4,695.60
Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 750 1.50 1,125.00
Type 41 Wear Course Ton 1,258.90 26.75 33,675.58
Traffic control L. S. 1 500.00 500.00
Repair water valve top box Each 2 175.00 350.00
Adjust water valve box Each 8 125.00 1,000.00
Adjust manhole casting Each 20 175.00 3,500.00
4" Double Solid Yellow Line L. F. 250.00 1.50 375.00
4" Solid White Line L. F. 167.00 .75 125.25
SUBTOTAL $52,346.43
Other costs @30.01% 15,710.54
Mill and Overlay Cost $68,056.97
A. Commercial and Industrial Property
The improvement and assessment rates for the commercial industrial property classification was
computed using:
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$68,056.97 7,956.54 F. F. $8.55/F.F.
IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$8.55/F.F. X 100% $8.55/F.F.
3
l9'~
~ 1
B. High Density Residential Property
The improvement and assessment rates for the public facility property classification was computed
using:
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$68,056.97 7,956.54 F.F. $8.55/F.F.
IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$8.55/F.F. X 75% $6.42/F.F.
C. Low Density Residential Property Assessment Rate
The improvement cost for the low-density residential property classification was computed using:
IMPROVEMENT COST
CONSTRUCTION $52,346.43
Less :
4" Double Solid Line (375.00)
4" Solid White Line (125.25)
Adjusted Improvement Cost 51,846.18
Other Costs @ 30.01 % 15,560.40
Improvement cost for
Low Density Residential 67,406.58
Assessable Frontage 7,956.52 F.F.
Improvement Rate $8.47/F.F.
Improvement Cost $67,406.58
Less:
Costs for C/I Property 247.67 F.F @$8.47/F.F. (2,097.26)
Costs for High Density
Residential 2,100.45 F.F @$8.47/F.F. (17,790.81)
Non-assessable frontage 625.05 F.F. @$8.47/F.F. (5,294.17)
Improvement Cost for Low
Density Residential $42,223.84
/9
TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$42,223.84 46 Lot Units $917.90/ Lot Unit
IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$917.90/ Lot Unit X 50% $458.95/Lot Unit
2. Curb and Gutter replacement
The cost to replace damaged curb and gutter amounted to $35,389.00. Other costs in the amount of
$10,621.17 were allocated resulting in a replacement cost of $46,010.17. This improvement will be
financed by the City's Major Street Fund.
C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels.
D. ASSESSMENT TERMS
The assessments for this project have a term of 5 years with interest charged at an annual interest rate of
7.00 % on the unpaid balance.
III. CITY REVENUES/(RESPONSIBILITIES)
IMPROVEMENT CITY'S
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSMENT (RESPONSIBILITY)
Streets Resurfacing $68,056.97 $36,232.67 $(31,824.30)
Curb Replacement 46,010.17 (46,010.17)
TOTAL $114,067.14 $36,232.67 $(77,834.47)
The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements.
Major Street Fund $77,834.47
Total $77,834.47
5
r
Gerald R. Wobschall
Reviewed Revie ed
a - rn 4~ 4L
Public Works Department Finance Dep ent
Dated Dated
cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Dougherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
GRW
6
9/10/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 1
ST797
PER FAVORABLE
TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE]
PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE
IDENT# DIVISION NAME
10-00900-010-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-00900-021-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-00900-031-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-00900-032-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-27500-040-02 FOX RIDGE 4020.14 4,020.14 4230 209.86
10-32375-010-01 HELEN KENNEDY ADDITION 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-41300-010-02 ROBERT KARATZ 513.60 513.60 0 (513.60)
10-41300-020-02 ROBERT KARATZ 545.70 545.70 0 (545.70)
10-41300-030-02 ROBERT KARATZ 4675.17 4,675.17 5720 1,044.83
10-41300-120-01 ROBERT KARATZ 3248.78 3,248.78 3410 161.22
10-44900-020-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-020-02 LETENDRE #1 917.90 917.90 654 (263.90)
10-44900-042-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-044-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-051-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-053-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-061-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-070-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-080-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-082-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-091-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-104-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-111-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-121-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-121-02 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-140-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-150-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44900-170-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-011-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-020-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-022-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-031-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-032-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-040-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-44901-050-03 LETENDRE #2 171.00 171.00 180 9.00
10-48000-010-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-020-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-030-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-040-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-050-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-060-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-070-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-080-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-090-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-100-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-110-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-120-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-130-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-140-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-150-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-48000-160-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05
10-77200-010-01 TRANSPORT AMERICA HEADQUARTERS AC 1946.58 1,946.58 2735 788.42
36232.67 36,232.67 45705 9,472.33
aa~
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
H. PROJECT 798, CANTERBURY FOREST/WEDGEWOOD VADDITIONS
STREET RECLAMATION
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the final
assessment roll for Project 798 (Canterbury Forest/Wedgewood 1st Additions - Street
Reclamation) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection.
FACTS:
• Project 798 provided for the bituminous resurfacing of the streets within the
Canterbury Forest/ Wedgewood V Additions, including Tiffany Circle, Tiffany
Place, Tiffany Court, Tiffany Point, Wedgewood Lane (North and South) and
Wedgewood Drive, in south-central Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility
report.
• The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on September 4, 2001,
with a public hearing scheduled for October 2 to formally present the final costs
associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. The
final assessments are approximately 13% less than the estimate contained in the
feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 20, 2001.
• All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property
owners informing them of this public hearing. An informational meeting was held on
September 26 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any
additional information of interest. Of the 143 parcels (R-1 single-family property)
being assessed, no one attended the meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Final Assessment Report, pages through .
a03
FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING
PROJECT HEARING DATES
NUMBER - 798 ASSESSMENT - October 2. 2001
NAME - Canterbury Forest and IMPROVEMENT- February 20.2001
Wedgewood First Additions
Street Reconstruction
IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED
F.R =Feasibility Report
FINAL F.R FINAL F.R
RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS
SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER
❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk
❑ Lateral ❑ Lateral
❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
WATER STREET
❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base
❑ Lateral la Surfacing
Single 1364.69 1563 /Lot
❑ Service
❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk
❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv.
❑ Trail/Sidewalk
SERVICES STREET LIGHTS
❑ Water & San Sewer ❑ Installation
❑ Energy Charge
CONTRACT NO.OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY
NO. PARCELS TERM RATE ASSESSED FINANCED
$223.540 F.R. $142.830 F.R.
01-01 143 10 Years 7.00% $195.150.67 $125.713.94
COMMENTS:
~D
~ 1
MEMO
city of eagan
MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall
DATE: September 17, 2001
SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll Project No.798
Canterbury Forest and Wedgewood First
Additions
Street Reconstruction
The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on February 20, 2001 ordered Project 798. According to
the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are
reconstruction of existing streets and replacement of curb and gutter. In the feasibility study, it was proposed to
assess the improvements using a lot unit method for single-family properties. This assessment roll is prepared
using the methods presented at the public hearing. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under
Contract No. 01-01, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 2, 2001. The following
information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll.
1. PROJECT COST
The construction cost includes the amount of $268,613.61 paid to the contractor for the construction of the
following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management,
inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling in the amount of $52,251.01 were incurred
resulting in an improvement and project cost of $320,864.62. The detail of these other costs is provided on
Schedule I and they are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each
improvement.
CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY
IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT
Street reconstruction $217,829.11 $42,372.35 $260,201.46 $298,050
Curb repair 50,784.50 9,878.66 60,663.16 68,320
TOTAL $268,613.61 $52,251.01 $320,864.62 $366,670
CO~
II. ASSESSMENTS
A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS
No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this
assessment roll.
B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
1. Street Reconstruction
The cost of the street reconstruction improvement was computed using the following unit prices and quantities:
UNIT EXTENDED
-----------------ITEM ------UNIT QTY PRICE ------------COST
Mobilization LS. 1 $3,875.00 $3,875.00
Reclaim Bituminous pavement Sq. Yd. 28,850 .67 19,329.50
Remove reclaimed material Cu. Yd. 3,149 10.50 33,064.50
Type 41 wear course Ton 2,125.80 31.35 66,643.83
Type 32 base course Ton 2,942.57 27.25 80,185.03
Tack coat Gal 1,455 1.25 1,818.75
Traffic control L. S. 1 827.50 827.50
Adjust water valve box Each 11 175.00 1,925.00
Adjust manhole casting Each 36 250.00 9,000.00
Water M Gal 16 25.00 400.00
Street sweeper Hour 8 95.00 760.00
SUBTOTAL $217,829.11
Other costs @19.45% $42,372.35
Reconstruction Cost $260,201.46
. Low-Density Residential Property
The improvement and assessment rates for the low density residential classification was computed using:
'OTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE
COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE
$260,201.46 143 Lot units. $1,819.59
IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE
$1,819.59 X 75% $1,364.69/Lot
ao06
2. Curb and Gutter replacement
The cost to replace damaged curb and gutter amounted to $50,784.50. Other costs in the amount of
$9,878.66 were allocated resulting in a replacement cost of $60,663.16. This improvement will be financed by
the City's Major Street Fund.
C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels.
D. ASSESSMENT TERMS
The assessments for this project have a term of 10 years with interest charged at an annual interest rate of 7.00
% on the unpaid balance.
III. CITY REVENUES/(RESPONSIBILITIES)
IMPROVEMENT CITY'S
IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSMENT (RESPONSIBILITY)
Streets Reconstruction $260,201.46 $195,150.67 $(65,050.79)
Curb Replacement 60,663.16 (60,663.16)
TOTAL $320,864.62 $195,150.67 $(125,713.95)
The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements.
Major Street Fund $125,713.95
Total $125,713.95
Gerald R Wobschall
Reviewed Review
4V-L--,r1- . 12JZ266tr,,3 e-'-)
Public Works Department Finance epartment
5.v 4- eo r 9- 7t 0
Dated Dated
cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works
Mike Dougherty, City Attorney
Sue Sheridan, Accountant I
GRW 0~o
9/7/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 1
ST798
PER FAVORABLE
TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE]
PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE
IDENT# DIVISION NAME
10-16350-010-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-010-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-020-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-020-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-030-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-030-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-040-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-040-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-050-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-050-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-060-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-060-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-070-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-070-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-080-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-080-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-090-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-090-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-100-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-100-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-110-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-110-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-120-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-120-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-130-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-130-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-140-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-140-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-150-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-150-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-160-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-160-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-170-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-170-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-180-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-180-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-190-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-190-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-200-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-200-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-210-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-210-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-220-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-220-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-230-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-230-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-240-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-240-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-250-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-250-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-260-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-260-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-270-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-270-02 CANTERBURY FOREST ao~ 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
i
917/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 2
ST798
PER FAVORABLE
TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE]
PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE
IDENT# DIVISION NAME
10-16350-280-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-280-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-290-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-16350-300-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-010-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-010-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-010-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-010-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-010-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-020-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-020-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-020-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-020-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-020-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-030-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-030-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-030-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-030-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-030-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-040-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-040-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-040-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-040-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-040-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-050-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-050-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-050-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-050-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-050-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-060-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-060-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-060-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-060-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-060-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-070-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-070-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-070-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-070-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-070-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-080-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-080-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-080-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-080-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-080-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-090-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-090-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-090-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-090-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-090-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-100-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-100-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-100-03 WEDGWOOD 1 ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-100-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-100-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST ~Dg 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
9/7/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 3
ST798
PER FAVORABLE
TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE]
PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE
IDENT# DIVISION NAME
10-83550-110-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-110-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-110-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-110-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-120-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-120-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-120-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-120-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-130-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-130-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-130-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-140-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-140-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-140-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-150-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-150-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-150-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-160-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-160-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-160-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-170-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-170-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-180-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-180-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-190-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-190-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-200-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-200-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-210-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-210-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-220-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-230-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-240-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-250-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
10-83550-260-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31
195150.67 195,150.67 223509 28,358.33
ago
I f
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
OLD BUSINESS
A. PROJECT 751, SOUTH DODD RD.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Reaffirm/amend the scope of the Project 751, So.
Dodd Rd. (Streets and Utilities) regarding the Red Pine Lane extension alignment and, if
appropriate, authorize design revisions and the re-advertisement for the solicitation of
bids.
FACTS:
• Project 751 provides for the installation of utilities, trails and the urban upgrade of
Dodd Rd from Cliff Rd. to approximately 600 ft north of 120`x' St. and a connection
from Dodd Rd. to Hwy 3 at the intersection of Red Pine Lane. Numerous
neighborhood meetings and public hearings have been held over the past several years
trying to satisfactorily define the scope of the proposed improvements. A consensus
from all affected and/or interested property owners could not be reached.
• At the April 3, 2001 public hearing, the Council approved the project consisting of a
28 foot wide street with an 8 foot off-street trail on the west side; no on-street
parking; the installation of a cul-de-sac on Dodd Rd. south of Farm Rd. and an
extension of Red Pine Lane from Highway 3 connecting to Dodd Rd. near the Hall
Street intersection (Hall St. Alignment).
• On June 19, the detailed plans for Contract 01-11 were approved for bid solicitation
and easement acquisition authorized.
• On August 7, the Council received the bids and considered the award of the contract.
Based on the objections from MnDOT and their refusal to grant the City a permit for
the proposed connection between Dodd Rd. and Hwy 3, the Council rejected the bids,
canceled the contract and authorized a revision to the plans with a new bid opening
scheduled for January 31, 2002. The Council also directed staff to request Rosemount
to install a 4-way stop on Dodd Rd. at 120th St. (But win Rd.) Rosemount's response
did not support this requested all-way stop at this intersection located entirely in their
jurisdiction.
• Since that Council meeting, neighbors have contacted Councilmembers addressing
their preferences for the proposed alignment of the extension of Red Pine Lane to
Dodd Rd. There are still strongly opposing positions from various neighbors
regarding the ultimate alignment. MnDOT has stated that they will only approve the
alignment that basically follows the platted right of way for Carol Street if Dodd Rd.
is closed with a cul-de-sac. This is to accommodate their requirement for the most
direct connection between Hwy 3 and Dodd Rd to replace the lost intercommunity
connector and reliever that Dodd Rd. would provide.
• 7 years ago on August 2, 1994 the Council held a public hearing to consider the
vacation of Carol Street as part of the development consideration of the Waterview
Cove Addition. After considerable discussion, the Council retained the Carol St. right
of way and directed the developer of the Waterview Cove Add. to modify it's plat to
accommodate the future Carol Street improvement. The Council also directed staff to
develop various Concept Plans for the future street alignments in this area.
• On August 16, 1994 the Council subsequently approved an alignment that extends
Red Pine Lane along the current Carol Street right of way to the Waterview Cove stub
street. The remainder of Carol Street between the Stub street and Dodd Rd. would be
vacated. This earlier proposal would meet with MnDOT's permit requirement for a 4'
intersection to Hwy 3 at Red Pine Lane.
• Residents along Waterview Cove presented an alternative alignment between the
"Hall St." and "Carol St." proposals for consideration. This modification will not
meet MnDOT's requirement.
ISSUES:
• The basic question of where the Red Pine Lane extension is located is necessary for
staff to proceed with detailed design plans and easement acquisition, if any. Certain
alignments will require greater amounts of easement acquisition depending on its
relationship to the dedicated right of way for Carol St.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Rosemount Stop Sign Letter, page _X-3.
• Contract 01-11 alignment alternatives, page,.
• So. Dodd Rd. Master Plan concept, page.
• Modified Carol St. Alignment Sketch, page.
r
CITY OF RO S E M O U N T 2875 Cl45th{Street West
Rosemount, MN
\ 55068-4997
r Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! Phone: 651-423-4411
_ Hearing Impaired 651-42 3-62 19
RECEIVEM651-423.5203
September 14, 2001 SEP 17 2001
EAGAN
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Tom Colbert
Public Works Director
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan MN 55122
RE: Dodd Road - Elimination of thru street and four-way stop at 120th Street
Dear Tom:
I presented your request to the City Council at their September 12, 2001 work session. It
has been a practice of the Rosemount City Council to only install traffic control if it
meets warrants. The consensus of the City Council was that this intersection would not
meet the warrants for a four way stop and they are not interested in installing a four way
stop at this time.
Sincerely,
Thomas DVurt
City Administrator
t~13
c
O
I e_
O 0
N O
2 N
O ° c m
o ` C
a N
a w
Ln Z c o
O a a N
\ m~ m ~a
~u m ~
c
\ c CO
\ \ m U Cc
m
Ua. m =cam
vm
m
4(r-~ we it Ncm
N c eo > o0 0
UJ W- Q 0.
N
blS, ; O
U
O
o
W U R
I`
\ 5
W U 70
ui w 0 ^O
M
M31A831dM
w
w
f- i
Q
U ~
Q
OVOb (3000
C
°b0 cc
~~j °OOa a
w
z o
0 Z.
U
a
z
r
uav~ TF+L
A
ILO Apr
VOOT9 fl ~ ~
ti(rx,t Ro•
ALTERNATIVE SIX
,0•17.94
ti Alf
arm ~
I
BONESTR00 AND ASSOC ~
' " 65163b 13'11
09/27/01 10:59
9f ~ \ , 0:03,103 N0; 691
~ t f I
' t
i ' ~ ! f tt
/ V-
T' J f.~ 'n~'aFs-qr•
f
t l• Q
f y P
i' I~ • J
i oO
• ~ fr• r ~h i !
s
i
1 t
! t
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001, Eagan City Council
B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING &
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - SHELTER CORP.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To continue consideration of Shelter Corporation's applications for a Comprehensive Guide
Plan Amendment from RC (Retail Commercial) to MD (Medium Density Residential), a
Rezoning/Preliminary Planned Development and a Preliminary Subdivision (Cedar Villas) to the
October 16, 2001 City Council meeting.
FACTS:
• This item was before the Council for consideration at the September 17, 2001 meeting.
• At the applicant's request, the Council continued the item to the October 2, 2001 meeting to
allow the applicant time to work with staff and to address the concerns and issues raised
during that meeting.
• The applicant has been working to modify the development plans, however, the revised plans
will not be ready for the Council's consideration on October 2, 2001.
• Therefore, the applicant has requested a two-week postponement to the October 16, 2001
City Council meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Correspondence from Jay Jensen at Shelter Corp., page ~F
C=?Ii2
09/27/2001 11:59 6123328284 SHELTER CORPORATION PAGE 02/02
Curpnratc ulli San t111lUII10 %
r
Shelter Corpor~atiott 900 900 SCC Second AvumC Somh 8000 IN IQ w'esas:, Suire 5~
SuitO S80 Stm Antonio. TX 78250
Minneapubs. MN 55403-3325 (210', 521.7701
(612) 341-78C0 Fax (210) 524-77M
Fax (612) 352.8254
Pamela Dudziak
Cite- of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Fagan, Minnesota 55122-1897
Subject: Request for postponement of the Cedar Villas zoning request
Dear Pam,
Per our telephone conversation, we are requesting that the City Council postpone their
consideration of the Cedar Villas zoning modification at the October 2, 2001 to their neat
meeting on October 16, 2001. During this postponement we ate working to modify our
submission to meet suggestions trade at the September 17" City Council meeting and the
September 21" meeting with Council Member Carlson and staff. Thank you for your
consideration.
Sincerelv,
Jay Jensen
Senior Tice President
1
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
Mew f3us-'re-r-S
A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
➢ To approve a Conditional Use Permit to erect a single-sided 672 SF off-premise
sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between I-35E
and Lexington Avenue in the northwest '/4 of Section 2, subject to conditions listed in
the staff report.
FACTS:
➢ Adams Outdoor Advertising (AOA) is requesting to construct a single-sided, 672
SF off-premise sign on Canadian Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The proposed
site is located across I-35E from the existing Delite off-premise sign.
➢ On August 7, 2001, the City Council denied AOA's request for a two-sided, 756
SF off-premise sign at the same location. Prior to adopting the Findings of Fact
for Denial on August 21, 2001, the Council agreed to continue action on the
Findings to allow AOA to submit a revised application.
➢ The revised application proposes a single-sided, 672 SF sign. This represents one
less sign face and an 84 SF reduction in size from the original proposal.
➢ Recently, an AOA sign was removed from a site north of the former Knox
Lumber property due to rezoning, platting and the current development of that
property by Northern Power Products.
➢ Earlier this year, AOA requested a Code Amendment to Table A of the Sign
Ordinance that would acknowledge a new sign location at the site being
considered with this CUP. On May 1, 2001, the City Council decided not to
direct staff to prepare said amendment.
➢ The City Council took action on May 15, 2001 to amend Table A of the Sign
Ordinance to reflect changes over the past few years.
➢ The current Table A reflects the removal of the off-premise sign (and the
corresponding city-wide reduction in the number of sign faces and sign square
footage) just north of the Knox Lumber site and, therefore, the present request by
C; g
AOA represents an increase to the number of signs, number of sign faces, and the
total sign square footage in the City.
➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 25,
2001. The APC is recommending denial of the Conditional Use Permit.
ISSUES:
➢ If the Council looks favorably upon this request, action should be withheld on this
item until the City Code has been amended to provide for locating off-premise
signs in rights-of-way.
ATTACHMENTS: (3)
Draft September 25, 2001 APC Minutes, page 40"01 through OCMQR
Staff Report, page Za3 through !0~
August 7, 2001 CC Minutes, page,
C;? C20
I [
City of Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission Meeting
September 25, 2001
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
Chair Heyl opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use
Permit to allow a single sided off-premise pylon sign on Canadian Pacific Railway right-
of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue in the NW'/< of Section 2.
Senior Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in
the City Staff's planning report dated September 19, 2001. He noted the background and
history.
John Bodger, Adams Outdoor Advertising stated the proposal is similar to the earlier
proposal. He discussed changes made to the application.
Chair Heyl questioned the right-of-way issue that states it would need a text amendment
to be allowed in the Canadian Pacific Railroad right-of-way.
Mr. Bodger stated he is not aware of the right-of-way issue. He stated Adams Outdoor
Advertising had one approved on the same railroad right-of-way in 1995. He stated the
State of Minnesota considers the railroad property zoned as the property that borders it.
There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the Public Hearing and returned the
discussion back to the Commission.
Chair Heyl questioned City Attorney Bob Bauer about the right-of-way on the Pacific
Railroad issue.
City Attorney Bob Bauer stated that the right-of-way is not zoned.
Member Segal moved Member Huusko seconded a motion to approve the request for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a 672 SF single sided off-premise pylon sign on
Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue
in the NW '/e of Section 2.
Chair Heyl stated she will vote against the request because of numbers 1,2,3 and 4 of the
requirements to add additional off-premise signage are not met. She stated the intent is to
lower the number of signs throughout the City.
A vote on the motion was taken.
aa~
City of Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission Meeting
September 25, 2001
Page 3
Aye: Huusko, Segal and Bendt Nay: Nosbush, Steininger and Heyl
Motion failed.
Member Segal moved, Member Steininger seconded a motion to deny the request for a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a 672 SF single sided off-premise pylon sign on
Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue
in the NW 1/4 of Section 2 due to the proposal not meeting the requirements 1,2,3 and 4
and the advice of City Attorney stating that this proposal is not permitted in a Railroad
right-of-way.
Member Huusko questioned if the City code was in place when the present signs were
installed.
Mr. Bauer stated the signs in the railroad right-of-ways are legal non-conforming uses.
Member Steininger stated the City has enough billboard signage.
A vote was taken.
Aye: Nosbush, Segal, Bendt, Steininger and Chair Heyl Nay: Huusko
aa~
~ 1
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 19, 2001 CASE: 02-CU-11-05-01
APPLICANT: Adams Outdoor Advertising HEARING DATE: September 25, 2001
PROPERTY OWNER: Canadian Pacific Railway PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley
REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Off-premise sign)
LOCATION: South of T.H. 55 between I-35E and Lexington Avenue
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Railroad right-of-way
ZONING: Railroad right-of-way
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Adams Outdoor Advertising has requested a Conditional Use Permit to erect a single-sided 378
square foot, 40 foot high off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south
of TH 55 between I-35E and Lexington Avenue in the northwest'/. of Section 2.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivisions 4C and 4D provide the following.
Subdivision 4C states that the Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit
and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it fords that such use at the
proposed location:
A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the
neighborhood or the City.
B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan and City Code provisions.
C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance
with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential
character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the
neighborhood.
aa3
Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP
September 25, 2001
Page 2
D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police
and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools.
E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation
that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because
of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion
or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets.
G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of
major importance.
Subdivision 4D, Conditions, states that in reviewing applications of conditional use permits, the
Planning Commission and the Council may attach whatever reasonable conditions they deem
necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with these uses, to protect the value
of other property within the district, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive
Plan. In all cases in which conditional uses are granted, the Council shall require such evidence
and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that the conditions stipulated in connection
therewith are being and will be complied with.
BACKGROUNDMISTORY
At their regular meeting of August 7, 2001, the City Council denied the CUP and directed the City
Attorney to draft Findings of Fact for Denial. The City Council denied the request after
discussion amongst current and former Council members about the intent of the Sign Ordinance
to reduce off-premise signage as development occurs. On August 21, 2001, at the applicant's
request, the Council continued action on the Findings to allow the applicant to submit a revised
application.
In December of 1991, the City approved a conditional use permit to allow an advertising sign
(billboard) greater than 250 square feet in area at 2867 Lexington Avenue (the Northern Power
Products site). One of the conditions of approval was that such sign be removed within 60 days
of the time the property is sold or developed. On April 3, 2001, the City Council approved a
rezoning and Final Plat (Northern Power Products Addition) to allow the future construction of a
50,000 square foot office/warehouse upon such property. As a condition of Final Plat approval, it
was stipulated that the billboard presently existing on the property must be removed.
As required, the billboard in question was removed from the Northern Power Products property.
Because the billboard owner (Adams Outdoor) was required to remove a billboard, the applicant
is now proposing a new billboard within the Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way
approximately 2,100 feet to the north of the previous location.
e~
~ r
Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP
September 25, 2001
Page 3
Additionally, Table A, located in Section 4.20 of the Sign Ordinance, depicts the location, size,
and surface of all billboards within the City. This table is amended from time to time to reflect
changes that occur over time. The table/ordinance was most recently amended earlier this year to
reflect changes made by City Council action and also the removal of the billboard previously
located on the Northern Power Products property north of the former Knox Lumber site.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject property is part of the Canadian Pacific railroad corridor. The property is flat and
covered with mixed weeds and grasses. Some scattered significant trees exist within the vicinity
of the proposed sign location. The sign would be located south of the rail tracks, just south of TH
55.
SURROUNDING USES
The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the
subject properties:
North - TH 55/1-35E right-of-way
South- Truck terminal; zoned I-1, Limited Industrial and guided IND, Limited Industrial
East - I-35E right-of-way
West - Canadian Pacific Railroad right-of-way/TH 55 right-of-way
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
Comlatibility with Surrounding Area - The subject property is bounded on the north, east and
west by highway rights of way and the south by an industrial use. There is a billboard sign west
of the subject site, across 1-35E.
While preparing the Findings of Fact for Denial, the City Attorney noted that the Sign Ordinance
stipulates that off-premise signs shall only be allowed on properties zoned for business or
industrial use (right-of-way is not zoned). Therefore, the City should not allow off-premise signs
in public or private rights-of-way unless the City Council determines that the City Code should be
changed to allow this type of signage in rights-of-way.
There are two other off-premise signs in Eagan that are located in right-of-way and they are
considered legally existing non-conforming uses. As with any non-conforming use, expansion is
not permitted and should these structures be damaged by more than 50%, they would not be able
to be replaced.
JC~50"
Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP
September 25, 2001
Page 4
Off-Premise Sim Requirements
Use Acceptability
Section 4.20 Subd. 4.C of the City Code states that off-premise business signs may only be
erected upon property zoned for business or industrial use. While the subject property (railroad
right-of-way) is located in an industrial area, it is not zoned for business or industrial use. A City
Code text amendment would be necessary to accommodate this request.
Conditional Use Permit
According to Section 4.20 Subd. 4.B.3 of the City Sign Code, the owner of an existing off-
premise sign may construct a new off-premise sign pursuant to a conditional use permit issued in
accordance with the provisions of chapter 11 of the City Code, and under the following criteria:
1. No sign will be permitted which increases the number of signs beyond the number of signs
depicted in table A (attached as an exhibit), as amended from time to time.
Approval of the conditional use permit would increase the total number of off-premise
business signs within the City from 11 to 12.
2. No sign shall be permitted which increases the total square footage of all signs beyond the
number of total square feet depicted in table A (which follows this section), as amended
from time to time.
Erection of the billboard would increase the total square footage depicted on Table A
from 8,086 to 8,464 square feet.
3. No sign shall be permitted which increases the total number of sign surfaces beyond the
total number of sign surfaces depicted in table A (which follows this section), as amended
from time to time.
Approval of the conditional use permit will increase the number of sign surfaces in the
City from 21 to 22.
4. The maximum square footage of a sign shall be 250 square feet; however, the city may
allow a sign in excess of 250 square feet upon (i) the reduction of the total number of
signs, square footage or surface areas depicted in table A (attached as an exhibit), as
amended from time to time, and (ii) amendment to said table A to reflect such reduction,
and (iii) further, so long as the total square footage of all signs is not increased beyond the
total of sign square footage depicted in said table A, at the time of application for a new
sign.
G~~6
Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP
September 25, 2001
Page 5
The applicant is proposing to erect a single faced sign measuring 378 square feet in
area. Thus, the applicant is proposing to exceed the maximum square footage
allowance by 128 square feet while not meeting the exception criteria.
5. No sign shall be located nearer to any other off-premises sign than 1,500 lineal feet on the
same side of the street or 300 lineal feet on the opposite side of the street.
The proposed billboard would meet the minimum 1,000 foot spacing requirement of the
Sign Code existing approximately 1,800 feet east of a Delite OutdoorAdvertising sign.
6. No sign shall be located on a platted lot that contains a business sign.
This provision will be satisfied
7. No sign shall be located within 300 feet of any freestanding ground sign or pylon sign.
This provision will be satisfied
8. No sign shall be located within 200 feet of any residentially zoned district.
This provision will be satisfied
9. No sign or any part thereof shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from the land
adjacent to the base of the sign.
The proposed billboard would measure 40 feet in height. Thus, this provision will be
satisfied
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The City Code states that off-premise business signs may only be erected upon property zoned for
business or industrial use. While the subject property is located in an industrial area, it is not
zoned for business or industrial use.
The City has permitted two other off-premise signs on right-of-way and, accordingly, those two
signs must be considered legally existing non-conforming uses.
The City should not allow off-premise signs in public or private rights-of-way unless the City
Council makes the determination that the City Code should be changed to allow this type of
signage in rights-of-way.
The applicant is proposing to increase the number of signs, total square footage of signs, and the
number of sign-faces in the City and to exceed the maximum square footage allowed without
meeting the criteria established for increasing the size.
as
Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP
September 25, 2001
Page 6
This proposal appears contrary to the intent of the City Code. The City has established a process
to reduce the number of off-premise signs over time whereby, billboard/off-premise signs are
removed as development occurs.
Further, while the "life span" of the billboard approved for the now Northern Power Products site
was unknown at the time, both the City and sign owner understood, at the time of approval
(approximately 10 years ago), and agreed that it would be removed upon development of the
property.
There are two other off-premise signs in Eagan that are located in right-of-way and they are
considered legally existing non-conforming uses. As with any non-conforming use, expansion is
not permitted and should these structures be damaged by more than 50%, they would not be able
to be replaced.
The acceptability of constructing a new off-premise sign in this area is considered a policy
matter to be determined by City Officials and would require a text amendment to the City
Code to allow this type of signage in rights-of-way, before action could be taken on this
request.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To recommend approval a Conditional Use Permit to erect a 378 square foot off-premise sign
upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between I-35E and Lexington
Avenue in the northwest of Section 2.
If approved, the City Council shall direct staff to initiate a City Code amendment that
would reflect the citywide increase in off-premise sign number and surfaces; and the
increase in citywide sign area and the following conditions should apply:
1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded within 60 days of fmal plat approval.
2. The applicant shall reduce the amount of billboard/off-premise signs, sign faces, and
sign square footage elsewhere in the City so that there is no net citywide increase as a
result of constructing the proposed sign.
3. A sign permit shall be obtained from the City prior to installation of the sign.
4. The sign shall not exceed 40 feet in height.
5. The sign shall not be nearer than ten feet to any property line.
a )0 J~
L
t
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 02-CU-11-05-01, Railroad Right-of-Way
There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-0- on the parcel for which
the conditional use permit is requested.
At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use
permit is requested.
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses
proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are
computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of
the City's utility system. The approval of the conditional use permit is not contingent
upon the payment of these Connection/Availability Charges. The charges become due
and payable with connection to the City's Utilities. The charges will be computed using
the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision.
No charges were computed because the railroad right-of-way will not be connected to the
City's utility system.
a~
O Eagan Boundary
Street Centerfins,
arcel Area
Location Map ~ P
F' Building Footprint
i
1
I
i
i ,
i
i
f
M ndo He'
Use man a-
i
I
I
r .
P -
4FP
i
Subject Site
44-
7 4 f mi
sI - -
1
- / i
4t
4-
}rte eQ0 ~ ~ [ 1 _ ~
1000 0 1000 2000 Feet
asses
Development/Developer. Adams Outdoor Advertising
Application: Conditional Use Per
Case No.: 02-CU-11-05-01
Map Prepared using E w 3.1. parcel base nap data provided N
by Dakota Counly Land Survey Depannunt and is current as of June 2001.
City of Eagan THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY w E
M. t N N E S 0 T A The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S
Coenreenity Developrnant Deparnrarrt not responsible for errors or omissions.
Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Adams Outdoor Advertising
Land Use Map Case No.02-CU-11-05-0
Zoning Map
1-1
Current Zoning: BP
ROW
Right-of-way
1-1
PD I-~
Hill 1111711111
1-1 C
~f
A
A
coo o ON 12M F.
Comprehensive Guide Plan
Land Use Map
8A
IND
Current Land Use Designation:
IND
ROW
Right-of-way IND
IND x iND 111111 IND
BP
no o .oo 12M rwt ~ INI
►seN b.w m.P tier prsHd.e y D.kota cm Lana S-Y D""wb"d 0"1101. N
s bM.rm.tY.n ,ml d by Clty std.
City of Eagan Z, w E
Community Development Department THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE WE ONLY S
The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information.
AUG ' .1 2001
August 8, 2001
Mr. Thomas Hedges
City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
Re: Relocation of Adams Outdoor Advertising sign
Dear Mr. Hedges:
Thank you for hearing our position on the Conditional Use Permit for
relocating the sign at the August 7t' City Council meeting. After careful
review of the wishes of the City Council and comments made by the City
Attorney, Adams would like to amend the application prior to the City
Council voting on the findings of fact.
Adams proposes eliminating one sign face and reducing the size by 84
square feet. This would make the application a single faced sign at 672
square feet, conforming to all of the requirements made for relocation by
appeasing two of the code criteria when only one is required.
We appreciate the opportunity to amend our application. (copy attached)
We remain committed to work in harmony with the City of Eagan and look
forward to approval of these revisions.
S' erely, I ~A/
obert A. Graiziger John P. Bodger
ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
.4300 BAKER ROAD, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 _ _ . .
TILL: 932.936.9567 MX: 952.936.9605 NN9/.ADAMSOUTDOOR.COM
3.
V . S l~ ~ o Fs~a I
SSGN SSZ ~
S ~ ~ rP
~y, dace
67A
CPA r
yo'
Td P
Cr~Zf~DE
f~enrl.vve ~~e S ~ n ce 6 7
A~ cO u I s
Re-vt-ses aldg14(
~ocG. ~~~/loam 2,' h~`-~f -"may
AdtV
t2~R
10 y_ T
o~
s ~ ~ q 5
7 a S ~ are -~'efi .
Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes
August 7, 2001
Page 7
Council took a brief break at 9:45 p.m.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a conditional use permit to erect a 756 square
foot off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between 1-35E and Lexington
Avenue. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report.
The applicant reviewed the proposed signage.
Roger Lurvik, owner of the property, expressed concern over the requirement that caused Adams to
remove the sign from the property and the loss of that revenue source.
Mayor Awada discussed the original development and intent of the sign ordinance.
Bob Graiziger and John Bodger of Adams, spoke about the sign ordinance and intent of the sign ordinance
review in 1990. They disagreed with the assertions made by Council members.
Sandy Masin, former Councilmember discussed the intent of the sign ordinance and stated that the intent
was to ultimately eliminate the signs.
Bea Blomquist, former Councilmember, also stated that she recalled the intent of the sign ordinance as
being to ultimately eliminate the signs.
Councilmember Fields moved, Mayor Awada seconded a motion to deny the application and direct staff to
prepare findings of fact for denial of a conditional use permit to erect a 756 square foot (378 square feet per sign
face) off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between 1-35E and
Lexington Avenue in the northwest'/, of Section 2, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 2 Nay: I Carlson
opposed.
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF AMERICA
City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a preliminary subdivision consisting of two lots
on approximately ten acres currently platted as Lots 9, 10 and part of 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park
located at 1769 Yankee Doodle Road at 3290 Terminal Drive. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report.
John Donnelly, applicant, requested that condition number three regarding restoration of the street and
concrete curb be reconsidered. Public Works Director Colbert recommended that the condition remain as part of the
preliminary subdivision.
Council agreed that the street and concrete curb be restored or an agreement be executed for the private use
of public right-of-way.
Councilmember Carlson moved, Mayor Awada seconded a motion to approve a preliminary subdivision
consisting of two lots on approximately ten acres currently platted as Lots 9, 10 and part of 11, Block 1, Sibley
Terminal Industrial Park located at 1769 Yankee Doodle Road at 3290 Terminal Drive in the SE'/. of Section 8,
subject to the following conditions. Aye: 3 Nay: 0
1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on
February 3, 1993: Al, Bl, E1, Fl, G1, and H1
2. The property shall be platted.
a3y
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (EAGAN PRESERVE) - DUKE
REALTY
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
➢ To approve a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) consisting of two lots and
two outlots on approximately 20 acres currently platted as Unisys Park 2°d Addition
located north of the Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersection in the SE '/4 of
Section 9, subject to conditions listed in the APC minutes.
FACTS:
➢ The property is vacant and has been part of Unisys campus for many years. Joe Miller
Homes purchased the property (80 acres) in the mid-1990's. Subsequently, the City acquired
approximately 60 acres for the purpose of developing Central Park and the Eagan Community
Center. The subject site represents the residual 20 acres of the original 80 acres.
➢ The only development proposed in association with the subdivision is a three story, 90, 000
SF office building that will house the offices, labs, and class rooms for the Medical Institute
of Minnesota. Any additional future development will need to be consistent with the zoning
of the property.
➢ The proposal subdivision will result in lots that will allow development consistent with the
R&D zoning. The outlots represent an area conveyed for ponding purposes and an area
reserved for a future roadway. The proposed site development (Lot 1, Block 1) will be a
three-story office building. Future development of Lot 1, Block 2 is undetermined at this
time.
➢ The APC held a Public Hearing regarding this item on September 25, 2001 and they are
recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the staff report.
ISSUES:
➢ There was some discussion regarding the provision of an additional public access to the
Perron property.
ATTACHII1ENTS: (3)
Draft September 25 2001 APC Mi^nut'es, page 9136 through~J
Staff Report, page ~ through Q6 -
Duke has provided additional information that is enclosed w/out page number
t
City of Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission Meeting
September 25, 2001
Page 6
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - DUKE REALTY CORPORATION
Chair Heyl opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary
Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) of approximately 20.66 acres to create two lots and three
outlots, located on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lockheed Martin in
the south '/z of Section 9.
Senior Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in
the City Staff's planning report dated September 19, 2001. He noted the background and
history.
Chair Heyl questioned which outlot will be eliminated. She asked if an additional
condition would be added to ensure elimination of the lot.
Mr. Ridley stated Outlot B will be eliminated. He stated an additional condition could be
added to ensure the elimination of Outlot B.
Bob Smith, Duke Realty, discussed the site plan and the timing of the project. He stated
the plat has several different lots and outlots. He stated the proposed Outlot A will be
used as park and trail dedication. He sated the Park Commission accepted the offer of
Outlot A. He discussed a storm water management pond on the site that will be
maintained and paid for by the applicant. He described a wetland on the north end of the
property. He stated Lot 1 is 8.4 acres and will hold the building. He stated the building is
a three story, 90,000 square foot office building. He stated Lot 1, Block 2 is being
reserved for future development. He discussed the grading plan, parking lot, access
points and stated the entire lot will be graded the same for efficiency. Mr. Smith
displayed the building layout and discussed the 26% green space. He stated the property
was designed to add extra green space to add to the Central Park environment. He stated
the landscaping plan needs modifications. Mr. Smith displayed pictures of a similar
building in Ohio. He discussed the timing of the development due to the educational
establishments schedule.
Member Steininger questioned if Outlot D would be deeded to the City.
Mr. Smith stated Outlot D will remain in Duke's possession.
Member Bendt questioned the present marsh and asked if the grading will be extended to
Yankee Doodle Road.
Mr. Smith stated the marsh will be mitigated, another marsh will be added on Outlot A
and the City's storm water pond will be extended into the wetland. He stated clean water
will be circulated into the wetland. He stated the grading will be extended to Yankee
Doodle Road.
031b
City of Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission Meeting
September 25, 2001
Page 7
Member Nosbush stated the proposed facility is nice, however too much woodland will
be eliminated.
Mr. Smith stated additional trees will be added to the landscaping plan to compensate for
those trees lost. He stated that most of trees on the property are not significant. Other
commissioners acknowledged the existence of many "scrub" trees.
Member Nosbush questioned the number of tenants.
Mr. Smith stated only one tenant will own and occupy the facility.
Member Bendt questioned the hours of operation.
Mr. Smith stated the facility will primarily operate during week days and early evenings.
He discussed during holidays and off-peak hours, the parking area will be provided for
overflow parking for Central Park and the Community Center.
There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the Public Hearing and returned the
discussion back to the Commission.
Member Steininger stated the 40-acre parcel to the west needs a deeded access.
Mr. Bauer stated the City is currently in discussion concerning the potential construction
of the access. He stated if the other lot is developed, there will need to be an access.
Member Steininger questioned if the adjacent property owner is protected.
Mr. Bauer stated the goal of the outlot is to preserve the corridor in the future so that if
the Perron property owner decides to develop, he can then petition the City for
construction and the that corridor is protected. He stated options are being left open at
this point.
Member Segal asked if the property to the south has access to the public right-of-way
without Outlot D. He expressed concern regarding creating land that is land locked.
Assistant City Engineer John Gorder stated the property to the south does have access to
the right-of-way because the access is not restricted on public right-of-way.
Member Steininger stated the present time is best to discuss the access. He stated in
addition the existing access to Yankee Doodle Road, the property will need additional or
alternate access at some point.
Member Nosbush questioned the requirements of sewer and water.
a3
r
City of Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission Meeting
September 25, 2001
Page 8
Mr. Bauer stated the utilities are a separate issue. He stated the corridor is being
preserved. He stated he is not certain that the City has the ability to give full dedication
to the road.
Mr. Smith stated the property will not be dedicated at this time. He stated the property to
the west does have access to Yankee Doodle Road.
Chair Heyl stated the applicant could return to the City for a re-plat.
Member Steininger questioned why the City should wait to act on the access. He stated
he will vote against the request due to the access issues.
Member Segal stated that the City Council should give more consideration before
approval. He discussed the many policy issues. He suggested that the City Council take a
hard look with Staff and seek legal advice.
Chair Heyl stated a future dispute is possible with the properties to the west.
Member Segal moved, Member Huusko seconded a motion to approve the request for a
Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) of approximately 20.66 acres to create two lots
and three outlots, located on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lockheed
Martin in the south '/2 of Section 9 subject to the following conditions as amended:
1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as
adopted by Council on February 3, 1993:
Al, B1-4, Cl, 2 and 4, D1, E1, F1, G1, and H1
2. The property shall be platted.
3. The applicant shall work with city staff to revise "street-scape" landscaping along
Central Parkway and along the Community Center access road, to match the
"look" of landscaping to be installed through the City improvement project for
Central Parkway and the Community Center.
4. All conifer trees (spruce and pine) shall be placed at least 15 feet back of curb
areas to allow for mature tree width growth without interference with vehicles,
snow storage, lawn maintenance, etc
5. Trees placed inside parking lot islands shall be centered within the island to allow
for mature tree root growth and snow storage. The applicant shall also include,
within the landscape plan, specifications for soil site preparation inside parking lot
a39
City of Eagan
Advisory Planning Commission Meeting
September 25, 2001
Page 9
islands. Each tree shall be installed in a minimum of 300 cubic feet of top soil,
(i.e. 6 x 20 x 2.5 feet top soil).
6. The development shall meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by
creating a minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 1.77 acre-feet covering a
minimum area of 0.51 acres. The stormwater treatment pond shall be constructed
generally according to NURP standards with a maximum depth of 8 feet and as
close as feasible to a 10:1
aquatic bench from the normal water level. A standard outlet skimmer may not be
appropriate in this case because of hydrologic considerations associated with the
wetland replacement area.
7. A cash dedication of $9,024 shall be required in lieu of ponding for untreated
stormwater that will runoff of 1.3 acres of the site.
8. The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan shall be approved by City
Council.
9. The developer shall negotiate a Parking Agreement with City for its use of the
parking area for City events.
10. The developer shall provide title evidence that the Private Perimeter Road
Agreement is no longer applicable to the subject parcel.
11. The developer shall dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the construction of
Central parkway.
12. Outlot B shall be removed from the plat and treated as an exception to the plat.
Member Huusko agreed with Member Steininger, however will vote for approval of
the proposal.
Member Bendt stated the application is excellent. He stated on Outlot D the developer
• is taking into consideration the concerns of the Planning Commission. He stated he is
in favor of the proposal.
A vote was taken.
Aye: Chair Heyl, Members Nosbush, Huusko, Bendt and Segal Nay: Steininger
a3q
t
PLANNING REPORT
CITY OF EAGAN
REPORT DATE: September 19, 2001 CASE: 09-PS-15-08-01
APPLICANT: Duke Realty Corp HEARING DATE: September 25, 2001
PROPERTY OWNER: Joe Miller Farms, Inc. PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley
REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision
LOCATION: SE'/4 of Section 9
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Special Area (SA)
ZONING: Research & Development (R&D)
SUMMARY OF REQUEST
Duke Realty is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots and four
outlots on approximately 20 acres currently platted as Unisys Park 2nd Addition located north of
the Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersection in the SE'/e of Section 9.
AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW
City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission
and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or
establishing conditions related thereto:
A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the
Comprehensive Guide Plan.
B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable
plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council.
C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography,
vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage
and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use
contemplated.
a ~a
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 2
D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development.
E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause
environmental damage.
F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause
health problems.
G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements
of record or with easements established by judgment of court.
H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a
timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance,
repayment of bonds, or similar burden.
1. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use
within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on
Solar Access).
J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent
with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands.
K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain
document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club
Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and
filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality
Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other
information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down
herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as
fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to
maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the
public."
BACKGROUND/HISTORY
The property is vacant and has been part of Unisys campus for many years. Joe Miller Homes
purchased the property (80 acres) in the mid-1990's. Subsequent to the City denying a request by
Miller to amend the Guide Plan to allow residential development, the City acquired
approximately 60 acres for the purpose of developing Central Park and the Eagan Community
Center. The subject site represents the residual 20 acres of the original 80 acres.
i t
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The undeveloped site has rolling topography and is lightly wooded with many open areas.
SURROUNDING USES
The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the
subject property:
North - NWA Office; zoned R&D and SA.
South - Yankee Doodle Road/Commercial; zoned R&D and SA.
East - Lockheed Martin; zoned R&D and SA.
West - Townhomes; zoned R-3 and Medium Density (MD).
EVALUATION OF REQUEST
The only development proposed in association with the subdivision is a three story, 90, 000 SF
office building that will house the offices, labs, and class rooms for the Medical Institute of
Minnesota. Any additional future development will need to be consistent with the zoning of the
property.
The property is zoned Research and Development (R&D) and is presently designated on the
Guide Plan Map as Special Area (SA). Staff reviewed the proposed us versus the R&D Zoning
and the Council was provided information regarding Duke's development plan. Due to the
nature of the uses within and the design of the proposed building, the conclusion was that the
building and use were consistent with the zoning of the property. The SA designation was
applied to the Central Area (and other areas) when the Guide Plan was updated earlier this year
to allow for further study. In this instance, the Council saw value in reviewing this quadrant of
the Central Area further due, in large part, to the City's acquisition of 60 acres within what was
formerly the Unisys Campus.
Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The proposal subdivision will result in lots that will
allow development consistent with the R&D zoning. The outlots represent park
dedication/ponding area, residual property from the Central Parkway alignment and a future
east/west access. The proposed site development (Lot 1, Block 1) will be a three-story office
building. Future development of Lot 1, Block 2 is undetermined at this time.
Lots - The proposed subdivision creates buildable parcels (Lot 1, Block 1 = 8.4 acres, Lot 1,
Block 2 = 3.6 acres) that exceed City requirements for lot area and width.
Setbacks - Required setbacks can be met.
a yo
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 4
Parking - The parking required for Lot 1, Block 1, based on a 90,000 SF office, is 480 stalls. The
developer is proposing 583 stalls. The applicant has stated that their client believes there is a
need to provide this amount of parking due to expected demands. All proposed stalls meet the
dimensional requirements of the City Code.
Building Architecture/Materials - The developer is proposing a reddish brown precast with over
half of the building glass being glass. Color photos of a similar building constructed by the
developer in Cincinnati are attached as exhibits.
Si na e - The applicant has not submitted a Signage Plan. Signage will need to be reviewed for
consistency with other signage in the office park.
Lighting - The applicant has not submitted a Lighting Plan. Lighting will need to be consistent
with City Code requirements.
Landscaping - The proposed amount of landscaping is acceptable; however, all conifer trees
(spruce and pine) should be placed at least 15 feet back of curb areas to allow for mature tree
width growth without interference with vehicles, snow storage, lawn maintenance, etc.
Also, trees placed inside parking lot islands should be centered within the island to allow for
mature tree root growth and snow storage. The applicant should also include, within the
landscape plan, specifications for soil site preparation inside parking lot islands. Each tree
should be installed in a minimum of 300 cubic feet of top soil, (i.e. 6 x 20 x 2.5 feet top soil).
The applicant should also work with city staff to revise landscaping along Central Parkway and
along the Community Center access road, to match the "look" of landscaping to be installed
through the City improvement project for Central Parkway and Community Center street-
scaping.
Green Space - Green Space requirements are met. The proposal has a green space of 26%.
Grading/Wetlands - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. A majority of the site will be
graded in preparation for building and parking lot construction. The preliminary grading plan
shows a large retaining wall along the west and south edges. The developer is negotiating with
the property owner of Parcel 010-79 to provide transition grading onto that property to eliminate
or reduce the amount of retaining walls needed. The proposed grading for the development will
match the grades of Central Parkway to the east and the Community Center site to the north, both
currently under construction with City public improvements projects.
There is one 0.35-acre natural wetland on the Eagan Preserve site. Under the Fish and Wildlife
Service classification system, this is a Type 3 wetland. The wetland is under the jurisdiction of
the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), which is administered by the City of Eagan.
Thus, any proposals to drain, fill, or excavate this area are subject to approval by the City.
q3
i i
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 5
The developer proposes to fill the 15,238 square-foot wetland completely. The WCA allows up
to 400 square feet of fill and requires proposals with more than that amount of fill to document
attempts to avoid and minimize those impacts and to submit a proposed wetland replacement and
monitoring plan. Wetland replacement is based on a 2:1 ratio, which means that twice the
amount of impacted acres needs to be replaced.
According to the replacement plan the City received from the developer on August 29, 2001, the
developer proposes to mitigate for 15,238 square feet of wetland fill by replacement of 31,362
square feet of wetland. The overall result would be 886 square feet more than the minimum
required by the WCA.
The proposed wetland impact by Duke-Weeks Construction is subject to a public comment
period-in accordance with WCA rules-that ends September 24, 2001. A replacement plan
decision on this matter by Eagan City Council is scheduled for October 2, 2001.
Storm Drainage/Water Quality - The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. Storm water
runoff will drain via storm sewer to Pond CP-3 (as designated in the City Storm Water
Management Plan -1990) in the northwest comer of the site. Pond CP-3 drains northwest
through storm sewer and will be expanded to provide for water quality ponding and wetland
mitigation for the development. Also, as part of the development, the developer will expand
Pond CP-3 to accommodate runoff from a portion the Community Center, eliminating the need
for the construction of new ponding on the Community Center site.
The development should meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by creating a
minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 1.77 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.51
acres. The stormwater treatment pond should be constructed generally according to NURP
standards with a maximum depth of 8 feet and as close as feasible to a 10:1 aquatic bench from
the normal water level. A standard outlet skimmer may not be appropriate in this case because of
hydrologic considerations associated with the wetland replacement area.
A cash dedication of $9,024 should be required in lieu of ponding for untreated stormwater that
will runoff of 1.3 acres of the site. The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan
should be approved by City Council, allowing the developer to fill 15,238 square feet of wetland
and create 20,037 square feet of NWC and 15,100 square feet PVC wetland.
Utilities - The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer for Lot 1, Block 1 is
available for connection along the north edge of the site. Sanitary sewer will be extended along
Yankee Doodle Road under the Central Parkway project to serve Lot 2. Water main will be
extended to the proposed development, also as part of the current Central Parkway project.
Streets/Access/Circulation - Public street access for the development will be available via
Central Parkway to the east and the Community Center drive to the north, both currently under
0?Vy
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 6
construction. Central Parkway will be a 58-foot wide street with a landscaped center median with
a 10-foot wide trail on the west and north side, extending from Pilot Knob Road to Yankee
Doodle Road.
Easements/ Permits/ Right-of-Way - Outlot D, as shown on the preliminary plat is delineated to
show the future right-of-way of "Quarry Road", a street planned to be extended west, ultimately
along the south edge of Quarry Park to Coachman Road. Quarry Road will provide public street
access to adjacent properties and an east-west traffic reliever for Yankee Doodle Road.
Dakota County is requiring the dedication of an additional 25 feet of right-of-way along Yankee
Doodle Road (County Road 28), as shown on the preliminary plat, to accommodate the
reconstruction of Yankee Doodle Road in the area, currently scheduled for 2004.
Tree Preservation - The proposed development will result in the removal of fifty-three thousand
six-hundred square feet (53,600 ft sq) of significant woodlands (71.9 % of the total). According
to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of
development proposal (single-phase, multiple-lot, commercial) is set at 47.5% of the total
significant trees. With a proposed removal more than the allowable amount, there will be
required tree mitigation for this proposal. This required tree mitigation calculates to thirty-six
(36) Category A trees.
The applicant should submit a revised tree mitigation plan indicating complete mitigation
fulfillment through the installation of thirty-six (36) Category A trees, or an equivalent
combination of Category B and/or Category C trees. These trees are to be installed in "natural
areas" (i.e. around ponds, in open areas, etc.).
Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety
netting) should be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone,
whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site.
The should applicant contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site
inspection at least five days prior to any grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree
Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing.
Parks and Recreation - There is no trail dedication. The park dedication should consist of the
development of a pond on Outlot A. The pond is intended to service run off from the community
center and shall be constructed in accordance with an approved City plan. The pond to be
constructed should be at the expense of the developer. Details of access, easement, and
ownership are to be negotiated with the City.
Also, the developer has agreed, in principal, to the public use of parking lots during City events.
The City and the developer should negotiate the use of this private property.
ass
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 7
SUMMARY/CONCLUSION
The subdivision and the proposed development appear consistent with the objectives of the City
Code and the zoning district. Issues regarding Central Parkway need to be worked through but
these can be accommodated with the Final Subdivision submittals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED
To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots and four
outlots on approximately 20 acres currently platted as Unisys Park 2°d Addition located north of
the Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersection in the SE %4 of Section 9.
If approved, the following conditions shall apply.
1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted
by Council on February 3, 1993:
Al, B1-4, C1, 2 and 4, Dl, E1, F1, G1, and H1
2. The property shall be platted.
3. The applicant shall work with city staff to revise "street-scape" landscaping along Central
Parkway and along the Community Center access road, to match the "look" of
landscaping to be installed through the City improvement project for Central Parkway
and the Community Center.
4. All conifer trees (spruce and pine) shall be placed at least 15 feet back of curb areas to
allow for mature tree width growth without interference with vehicles, snow storage,
lawn maintenance, etc
5. Trees placed inside parking lot islands shall be centered within the island to allow for
mature tree root growth and snow storage. The applicant shall also include, within the
landscape plan, specifications for soil site preparation inside parking lot islands. Each
tree shall be installed in a minimum of 300 cubic feet of top soil, (i.e. 6 x 20 x 2.5 feet top
soil).
6. The development shall meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by creating a
minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 1.77 acre-feet covering a minimum area of
0.51 acres. The stormwater treatment pond shall be constructed generally according to
NURP standards with a maximum depth of 8 feet and as close as feasible to a 10:1
a
Planning Report - Eagan Preserve
September 25, 2001
Page 8
aquatic bench from the normal water level. A standard outlet skimmer may not be
appropriate in this case because of hydrologic considerations associated with the wetland
replacement area.
7. A cash dedication of $9,024 shall be required in lieu of ponding for untreated stormwater
that will runoff of 1.3 acres of the site.
8. The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan shall be approved by City
Council.
9. The developer shall negotiate a Parking Agreement with City for it's use of the parking
area for City events.
10. The developer shall provide title evidence that the Private Perimeter Road Agreement is
no longer applicable to the subject parcel.
11. The developer shall dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the construction of Central
parkway.
STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL
A. Financial Obligations
1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined
in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates
in effect at the time of final plat approval.
B. Easements and Rights-of-Way
1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements
centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate
existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The
development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as
determined necessary by engineering standards.
2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the
acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to
public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage
capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the
boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this
development.
3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope
easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the
appropriate jurisdictional agency.
4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements
to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as
necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements.
C. Plans and Specifications
1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to
provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a
registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes,
engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final
plat approval.
2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be
prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat
approval.
3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a
cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards.
C~ Yff
4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the
proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan
shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released
until one year after the date of City certified compliance.
D. Public Improvements
1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate
project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval.
E. Permits
1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory
agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval.
F. Parks and Trails Dedication
1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as
recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource
Commission and approved by Council action.
G. Water Quality Dedication
1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication,
ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified
in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the
Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and
approved by Council action.
H. Other
1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall
be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action.
Advisory Planning Commission City Council
Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987
Revised: July 10, 1990
Revised: February 2, 1993
LTSMS
STANOARD.CON
I L
FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Eagan Preserve Preliminary Subdivision
There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling 5-0- on the parcel for which
the conditional use permit and subdivision is requested.
At this time, there are pending assessments, which total $506,350 on the parcel for which
the subdivision is requested. These pending assessments are related to Project 7908,
Central Parkway
Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses
proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are
computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of
the City's utility system. The charges become due and payable with connection to the
City's Utilities. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of
connection or subdivision.
IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT
Storm sewer trunk C/I $.132/Sq. Ft. 548,644 Sq. Ft. $72,421
TOTAL $72,421
asp
i
i 0 1!"an aoundary
Location Map ~P~Am:
auildlrq Footptrtt t
to r a . ° 4 d
I F $1 4"
ep
' PI
E• ° L I s c- -0 'r Fit,
A 4 f C)
v o n +
0 ` @IE
t~1 Q t
•
t: .
M®®®is ® • t
t
i'{r ,A
S`
~L
Ef~
®mmm mm~
Subject Sit
x j ky
a
16 E
® .
1000 0 1tp0 2000 Feet
Development/Developer: Eagan Preserve
Application: Preliminary Subdi
Case No.: 09-PS-1S-08-
Wp Pr■p■ n ER rw t.1. %,V b■■■ wap dtb provW.d N
tN o■kM■ eouney Yt7■p■rtnwro ■nd euom or .ww■ 2001.
City of Eagan THIS MAP If INTENDED FOR RE,:, ENCE YiE..L. w E
M ! N N E S C T a Tbs City of Eaoan and Dakota County do not ywnrrtae tM aeeuraey of this Information and an S
C--.ft D■vdepiw■- Dep■rtw-t not responsible ter errors or emissions.
Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Eagan Preserve
Land Use Map Case No. 09-PS-15-08-01
Zoning Map s V `\`l V
a O
roc0 t
Current Zoning:
RD
Research and Development P
RD
A
LB
NS
-El
P4 I GB
PF A
3
1 R~
NRA
taw ren o PD
eoo o tao
Comprehensive Guide Plan z U
Land Use Map M O
sw
dD
oho
N ~ .
Current Land Use Designation:
P
SA
Special Area SA
SA
o►s
RC
QP MD NO E SA A
MO
000 o 03a taro Pm m m to 0 hwl Yew en ~eeNM~ Ceynty Leer Barmy Dger6wnt 04Vt1Dt. N
nb a erY~taYr~ by Clq sW.
4kity of Eagan Z W E
Community THIS MAP Is INTENDED FOR REFERENCE UsE ONLY
Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarani the accuracy of this Information. S
I L
i
s
807.62
9id3.. f
aft; Im
Ng E v _ 1 _
-`..-max ~ / / J ~ \ 1 ~ ~ t ~ ~ I i
f
-5 45~W~
~ Ili ~ ~yJ~l
e52 ~ ~ 4v
• ~ E, ~ 1 I I I ~q ` I I
I `
•J. ji-II ~ - I ~ y~// ~ i-I ~
\ \~I IIII f ~,I ,
~~~i~~fF I ~ ~ N81 lilt 78~ ~ilJ i /x n n
rr , F rr =
'~''~}F .Fir' ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > p~ ( ,
m
o
L
-47
c V b: W;;
i p PfiEL~ABJAflT $UBDMSION ARGOSY EDUCATION R INC. RY
o ( f will
EAGAN PRESER SJBDMSION ".w' f
Ft t • r1 t Ia:}[,
fo( 1 ~![ti[- YANKEE DOOOtF RWO t P 07 RION [OAD ~i • ti ~~-1 Be
4l1t 1! ~.a j, EAG~w. wNMESOTA / arc .J J e
_ Y Existing Conditions u; r
i
_ 17'
Nrsa Sus
aSR ` jj~ pin
1 A
1101/3 r a;.•1a
NOISIAIOMIS AMVMMIJUd- 'M`dW Y O3 ASOOWV NOISIAN1811S AtlrN1Y13tld 'r~1~i 1 :r
11 ~a~ 1 11 \
j 1 I
-
1 ir'- - - tip-- - - - - J y~~-
. ~ ! 1~ I I I nwi~P•nl~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ t ~ ''Ja~ ~ • l ~ '
yA•t ~nwln moors
- 1~----
vim awc+a
y; J e.
W
* i
„
t d 1
1-
V i
1 c` _ ~ 1 I
1=I I
iCeR R~nttass« `
-
ih!
I i
41
vzz,
II ry I ~ I
F' s9~610!'
- 6--
50935'45'E
t t! 1 807.62 1
>E I i ~ / 61Z~;Oa'
If If
N0935'45'w'
817.19
°ogg$goor I j°Cf t I 1 / 0/I'ti
b _ O cf .t °~~I I f9 p. L
oooo tit {l2~~ I 1/ fs//~'o
°o m > kpR #i F~ 1! fFE J;=j y8 ,
t~FI tE Y Y;t I ~ I " III
p uU-H,~ j o I
°o i tl,,° r I ,1 III
I 1
oonlo• um ! t ids [ I 1 1 ILL ~a I o
N N ONi Ip - V (Y~.' 0 0 0 I I l i
>
n~ ~~~~^A'I~n rpn ~1 I~ I
Ih NNN NN NN L~NI jn O I ~,I O I
L--- y.4
Pa' > > "I ; Il\ III A
A i~ 11-- - tt~ 1 I I III o
PA ° II OIRLOT O
Yr44
z
i \ ~ - / III
I . ` ~ ,mow-~-- I ~ I
N
rm5x {I ~l
- - 10ltt3sdltT - - - - t
- - - - - - - - N89.5056 W 50227
~j N x ~
tt:I '
ttet
i -------------i- --A----
C, r, A
77
ct J r 111j) S PFI1RJ WARY SUBDMSION ARGOSY EDUCA N G OUP, Y SUBONISION ;
tl N t t+ EAGAN PR irom r~.~ rry+it
Q Y 1 1 ~~~.t YANKU DOODLE RW k PILOT [N00 ROC
( ( N I {I~tl EAO M. MINNESOTA we t J , 9r_ `
L PRELIMINARY PLAT ~Q
_ U0 Id 104uoO uo!soJ3 V a6ou!ou(3 u'PDPJ
1 ~ i~ , VLO53NNIn 'NV9V3 a'
~J 1 Mbi so+>, 10114 a a4OM 310000 33)1WA ]iii. o
_C2. j 32,d NV9v3 t:d,.• U ° !o
~ NOWAKK 1S I 'dno VOA03 ASOOdY NOSWCBM AWNrf-2LW t_TT~~itFli i
•~1
- Otis ~~li hA C,.~ y Zr=
va----.
} 0L-
t`
...1~:~ t 11 `f' \ .'Yy / • - 1 1!111 u' I t `
I' T
Iv t r
r4 d
o¢
A ' I ° 1 11 ~11 ~,il v III
1 1 t `1 i 1 X111 y O0>• Yv- lII
_ I ~..'I. ' 11111 {
III ~ ~f 1 1 x'111
'111
, 111 e 7 EQ
H f ~ r ~ ' 1111 I ~ ~ t ~ ~ E ` ! ! °
' ~I ~ , it / ' ~ Mini 1 ~ ■ _ ~ i 1 ~ I~i ~}fe `i~ p~p ■p]tt■p] !p]]! ~ ep` e!■
. :I~~~`~.:\~,-f~ ••'~r=/• nllll 'y' -..::}R ~ a~j~.if~~il~~~7i[0■~l~~e~
I Iljpl ' J gp e gg g
1~1 ' ;~InN' ~P.~~I~~1dCl~i~iii~$;dill
I /1 ilii~ r ri°O1°~°tf I I TI I,~..tr1O}' fIlF1
'~♦I, ' a 1 11111'1 • I II I~
r ' , /r fit ` ~ \
X11 tll
hlll
~ , / it i J}1 i il'iil' 1 _ snw ~ _ i~;
I' • :i ill' ~,{'~':'I/~if r - - ~6-5
1 I 1 : 111 - - -
i I r: 9 / l / I1 r ~'l111 "~.,a'~,
- - f ' l I la ~ lysr'l~~ ! elan. a.wn `.,._..,,...~'~n''°1.~-;,,, < ~ C.. ' •..y,.,.:~,. ~ ..a
I { 1 / /u{//of l - - -
~ t
%
/i ~y Wit' \ \ c1 ?
0!//r t~ n y\ `i 1 tom; G a, t 1 + \ 1 ,`'q
't i : v' . e<F`,i ; ~kx: <v / rte' `7.a,. ; ♦ 1, - d x
AINOO&PO" Mlos7t4" 'WW3 WOY .oy. LOly : OM V 110000 33"A r • , 3
0
M 3NI 'dnoan uionai AsoDuv 1~0GWS-3 AHVNVflgW s
t
2 3z
Ana L _1 _ N i V
TT - ¢O
-R .err _ 't._ - - - - ~ ~ - -
\
A 1A
s I a I • j .iii ~i a}}flt~I
t- ~
ilt
A 1 IA',
I a
I y
I u
I I > / CIF f Y ~ O
I u~ w wcsr whir O~t-.1-Cr~awcr•IN• bylyY M1Vl
L
r~.w ..+rc.+ a♦a-rc..q♦ri•nttwti..• warn vzri• ~ to
~4i 11 ~ I ~ ~ ♦ ~ .11 / ix.-~:.~-sar--.._1 se,~-o - P~==
,J F ~ ^ • \ / fir- ~ \ (r , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,11 l~ ~ ~ i
; lli~l III Or
,III \ J
Io1 / !
E ii Nti •+e aii••{ N+ { P { it ttti{t esc- I
II 666i~it 111111 fill it, d i i i f4e64ii
If
li
+{++a Rtt+Stt{••ettt++•.++etl{+{5ti P S / 1 2 I
~i~~ii~~~iiitiitiltititiH~~ii;i"= ♦ ~ ~ '1 ~1 I ~
l
+ e P { + P { P +{{ttee t {ai{{i{t+t+fe{{\{+e.etq I r ( / \ -i . ♦ I
~ iii { { i{F+NiFtiiSGRtcFiLi i'.tR+~ Ft - I I l ~ \ \ ' I ~ / 1 I
li++i
$
♦ I f
l-
a
C= ` N r- i~xe a+r--------
y K
H
n o i
PPARJM JARY SUBDNISION ARGOSY E ATION ROUP, INC.
NIT, SUBDIVISION
i t e N J I !~11~ tc EAGA RESERVE y~ li ~~t ~pf
o t p i YII YArcEE OOOOIE ROA B ROAp • 1+
w I Iy UGw, ui«r+ESOTf ' ` • I J -j
It
L H TREE PRESERVATION PLAN wf c J
I T
gold fivIn i
^I~ r,nae V1o Vom 'NV~V3 10
` 1) a~ QYOtl lots 101W V 6VOU 316000 37wwA N ! ~
~~BH 11 Nan 3n83S3ad Nd9V3 f U ° io
Ul1r -r a-•;,, N0161N08f18AklVt ENd Iltl~(103 ASOOHY NOSWCEn3ZYNw-ow t-
a i1::; yy 4 U
--w -_-__-----_____--___3 Wo
ro °q+z+r+Y _ _^-!aw` J
xm - k - ` t-__-__-- Ix
rr a~ \ I 1 ~ _1 I ~ It
t I 1t n \
u
ti .0
a °
I.I' 'k III !t
1i1 w ;'I.' ~ ; III w
oil
k
' tr,itl tot~ 3
lk,Yt i~ Pi f f .i-~.:
g' 'i
= 1
• - , ;~jl ~ ~ ~ 1. ~ _ ~ ~..T-.-_~
it 411/ 11-
\I 1 n; A l r
lot
-jl
t 1V1d AVVWR113Yd 1~ 1
I,•t, N ~L
m.na • 11711 N
u.OY somm 101W , O.OY MOO()
~I ~B wwt~, MOSM 11VOV7 ~Ij~t t v ' 1 le
nll, roosu r>s o,u 'dnoro wotivx 3 Asooav Hoswaens 1, 11: ;
AWWNVVGUJ
- t rrrwl ! (ti i
• i
rvn•; -~•7nnn.; rt.vl R ~ ~ ~ 2 fit!
a
1~`~ •:v:
111 ~ ~~~a!r
11 I \1 i all
1 ' '1
Clow*
► = =
I I1. 1 o e~g~~ NN NN NNNW
111 1:. f[ . V
~ Ili ri I t 1:: ~ 7 ~~`a. s! r t w
till , , # _ ~ o
L .1 . J t;
fit
f: • / I ~ at :'t t :'r:' -J«. ti.l ~~~.ilt l J J J
40
I1 M cto
mot/,' 1 / / 4.90.R6W+
I'm
I
r / . i
rs
e'
7
/
i
B
i
i
1
i
a~
•i .
J,1
I
1
I
a
LI,
1
j~~~r 11
~n coca
III
I J
z
i
Agenda Information Memo
October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting
C. STOP SIGN PETITION. DIAMOND DR AND GARNET LANE
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the petition for a Stop Sign on Diamond
Dr. at Garnet Lane and provide the appropriate direction.
FACTS:
• City Staff has received a petition requesting the installation of Stop Signs on
Diamond Drive at Garnett Lane. Since receipt of this petition, the streets near this
intersection have been under construction precluding the staff from performing any
measurement of "typical" traffic operations to determine if any warrants justifying
these requested traffic control devices have been met.
ISSUES:
• Based on past experience and knowledge of similar intersections, it is doubtful that
Stop Signs will be justified according to the warrants contained in the Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) that the City has adopted.
• Based on current staff workload of completing this year's construction program, a
standard traffic evaluation study cannot be completed this year unless a consultant is
retained to perform this work at an estimated cost of approx. $2-3,000.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Petition, pages ~thno h ~ .
• Location Map, page a65 .
~6~
FOR CITY USE ONLY
DATE RECEIVED -7- a 5
city of eagan DATE PRESENTED
TO COUNCIL
RECEIVED APPROVED ❑
JUL 2 5 2001 DENIED ❑
EAGAN PETITION
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
STOP SIGN
I/We, a undersigned her y petition the City Council of the City of Eagan to install stop signs on
at the intersection with r Ct ar) c~ rr r I '
01-ea'-S-c s-ee ma~
I/We, request this installation for the following reasons:
1. r lQQS2 5ecl Su T1emen+
2.
3.
4.
I/We, request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest
opportunity and that we be informed as to when it is scheduled so that we may appear in person if w
so ch e
Axq ~Z~-K Laf so~ '119S O 1 o~ncl Or l v c M SS 1 a,2
NAME (Please print and initial) ADDRESS
D, &n e hl~moha--) 'S5 1 C)'za
2. AA-v~j To Ac~/ 4l~!Y %av~a~~ dlr. Engav, Nth SS1ZZ
3. 1 kyae ~(3(, .i~r•a.~d ~ ~ rn+.) SSI a~
4. ~,l 11L 14N 9
5. -Dt,,iU k.D,Gws y«Y ~,a►KU+.~ D, L=~~ ~tN ssizz
6. ~a~ ~avrr~ /~yA~~°S ylaN piti,•.o/ldd.. Ea /jtw. SS/a a
7. ~1C1R LIt30 D(24vno►-,per
a. '/y/3 Aj 42 nl(p A x ,g 60-UCI.41 S~U)
G:FarmsdLish13t PN.d. e
I [
City of Eagan Petition for Stop Sign
Supplement
We request this installation for the following reasons:
1. Diamond Drive is a long, straight, main street into our neighborhood
allowing cars to accelerate to an unsafe speed. This speed presents a
danger to our children playing in our front yards and driveways. The stop
sign would slow the cars down and force them to stop before entering the
main parts of our neighborhood.
2. This stop sign would provide a safer street for the kids that use the Cedar
School ball fields on the west side of Diamond Drive. The cars leaving
the neighborhood would have to stop before continuing on past the ball
fields.
Q 4098 2105 2101
2097
2130 2124 209
2170 4091 EMERALD LN.
2166 2167 2116 2104 208
9-28-Ot
2163 4097
06 2162 4110 2110 2096
2159 4103 2091 2088
4112 2158 4116 2106 082
2151 4109 078
4118 2150 4124 2087
2143 4115 2102 083 2079
4124 2142 2135 4130 2098 20
2127 4123 4136 094
4130 2134
4129 2088
4134
2128 2117 208
4140 2111 2103 4144 2095 2087 2080 2076
3
2124 GARNET DR. 208 207
4146 2079
2120 G 2075
2116 2112 2108 2104 2100 2096 gR,yFT 207 20
4152 4H
4158
4162
4168
Q
4172
O Cedar
Cedar School 0 418 Pond
0
O ZZ 4184 . Park
U ~
Z Q 4190
4196
DIFFLEY ROAD
® Stop Sign Petitioners
Stop Sign Petition Location Map
Diamond Dr. / Garnet Dr. / Garnet Ln. Sept. 2s, o,
City of Eagan
fo 1--4 <0,0
i r
• O
O
Faithful Shepherd Catholic School and Tri-Parish Center
o / Third Annual Silent Auction Event
January 26, 2002
RE: Application and Permit for Temporary Liquor License
Date: September 14, 2001
Dear Mayor and City Council Members,
Thank you for your consideration of our application. We are planning our Third
Annual Silent Auction Event to be held at Faithful Shepherd Catholic School on
January 26, 2002. Our event will include a dinner and bar service.
Since this is a fundraising event, and all proceeds will go to the support of our
school, we are requesting your consideration in waiving the applicable fee of
$150.00 for this temporary license. If you have any questions regarding this
application, please feel free to contact me at the following number: (651)683-0512.
Thank you for your support and consideration!
Sincerely,
Kathelina Draves
Food and Entertainment Chairperson
Silent Auction Committee, Faithful Shepherd Catholic School
T
~.„Lp.i www.ups.sraie.mn.usiatcgambiatcent/torms/4daytemp.htm:
Minnesota Department of Public Safety a
ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
S"`e
s, 444 Cedar St., Suite 133, SL Paul, MN 55101-5133 a~ <
(651)296-9519 FAX (651)297-5259 TTY (651)282-6555
T ~ <
APPLICATION AND PERMIT
FOR A I TO 4 DAY TEM"RARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
(Organizes or location limited to 3 permits in a 12 month period)
TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION
OF O$G ON DATE ORGAN= T YE PAL
T7RF 5 r ST
I
Mff-
OF 3'E[LSSJ IN , LIGATION B t VL H H P Q -951
Ll I;0R W BE S . L 0194 stays) rI OF' ORGA ' TION
0. CLUB 0 CHARITABLE
F 'P O NI' ITN ERaS NAME APPRESS
T\ IL, rc~o fN YY`Q,, ts-ta rY1 55150
ORGAN17.ATTON OFFICER'S NI AME ADDRESS
ORGANILA° ION OFF'ICER'S N)M. A17DIt SS
Location wbcre ion ;M G; used. If an outdoor
re'1112114, Ilia - 60122
Will lho applicant Contract for intoxicating liquor smTim? If so,** the name and addret~ of dko Liquor tioraate providing the smite.
Will %c applicant carry liquor liability' lrpo the ee s ounqAnd amount
(NOTE, Insamoe is not mandatory] ~ 11Z W k yf)(lj2
APPROVAL
APPLICATION MUST Bib APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY REFOR17 SUBMI`IMGTO LIQUOR CONTROL
CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVW
CITY FEE AMOUNT LICENSE DATES
DATE FEE PAID
SIGNA11=- CITY CLERIC OR C:OUN'f Y {?Fr•7CIAl. APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR
NOTE: Ito not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed by this division
will be returned as the lieense. Submit to the City or County at leant 30 days Wom the event.
PS-t}9079(Sf95
I oft 06/14/2001 10:33 AM
1 t