Loading...
10/02/2001 - City Council Regular AGENDA EAGAN CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING / EAGrkN MUNICIPAL CENTER BUILDING OCTOBER 2, 2001 6:30 P.M. 1. ROLL CALL & PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE H. ADOPT AGENDA III. RECOGNITIONS & PRESENTATIONS IV. CONSENT AGENDA Fp. AAPPROVE MINUTES 1 p B. PERSONNEL ITEMS / C. APPROVE Temporary Liquor License - Faithful Shepherd Catholic School D' SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent Utilities E. SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent False Alarm Bills y F. SCHEDULE Public Hearing for Certification of Delinquent Weed Cutting Bills /SAG. APPROVE 2002 Funding Application to Dakota County for the Community Landfill Abatement Funds. ~/6 H. DIRECT Staff to Prepare an Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 11 to Provide for Waste Transfer Stations as a Conditional Use in the I-1 Zoning District. /9/71. APPROVE Final Subdivision, Four Paws Addition - Four Paws Pet Resort I~'C1 J. APPROVE Purchase Agreement - 2246 Clark Street K. APPROVE Purchase Agreement - 4185 Strawberry Lane L. APPROVE Easement Agreement for Project 771, Studio 3345 (Lexington Avenue - Street & Utility Improvements). tl ~am. APPROVE Resolution to Implement Project 800 (Cedar Grove Access Reconfiguration) upon / Approval of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funding N. APPROVAL Resolution to Implement Project 859 (TH 55/Lexington Ave/Blue Gentian Rd - Intersection Reconfiguration) upon Approval of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funding P~ y O. APPROVAL Resolution to Implement Project 860 (TH 55/Blue Water Rd - Intersection Reconfiguration) upon Approval of MnDOT Cooperative Agreement Funding OP. AUTHORIZE Traffic Control Study, Cliff Lake Rd & Kyle Way WQ. APPROVE Change Order No. 2 to Contract 01-07 (Lexington Ave - Street & Utility 1 Improvements) P.33 R. AUTHORIZE Feasibility Report for Project 861 (2002 City-Wide Trail Improvements) S. APPROVE Change Order No. 1 to Contract 01-14 (Storm Mitigation Improvements, Beaver Y 3 Dam & Bear Path) T. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 840 and Schedule Public Hearing (Robin Lane - Storm Mitigation Improvements) 3C~ U. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 843 and Schedule Public Hearing (Beecher Drive - Storm Mitigation Improvements VQ V. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 844 and Schedule Public Hearing (Forssa Way - Storm Mitigation Improvements) ~L~(1 W. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 845 and Schedule Public Hearing (Rocky Lane/Paddock Court - Storm Mitigation Improvements) YZ X. RECEIVE Feasibility Report for Project 810 (Lift Station Upgrades - City Wide) and Authorize Preparation of Plans & Specifications p FY. APPROVE Contract with Decision Resources for Golf Course Questionnaire & Survey PS07 APPROVE Status of Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau (ECVB) as a separate 501(c) & APPROVE Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws fee PROCLAIM October as Toastmasters Month BB. APPROVE Subgrantee Agreement with the Dakota County CDA for the administration of C CBDG funds designated by the City Council for Fiscal Year 2001. CC. ADOPT Resolution/Order to Initiate Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for Blue •7 Cross/Blue Shield East Campus. ~DD. Approve Telecommunications Lease Agreement, Verizon Inc. (Southern Lakes Water Tower - v Antennae) V. 6:30 - PUBLIC HEARINGS A. VACATE Easement, Sun Cliff 15t Addition (Lot 13, Block 1) 6 B. VARIANCE, RAJ Khanchandani - Variance to allow 7-foot building setback (30' standard) o from a public right-of-way (Timberwolf Trail) and a Variance of 1.4% from the 20% lot coverage allowed in a residential zoning district for Lot 13, Block 1, Suncliff I" Addition, located at 4277 Sunrise Road in the NE of Section 29. SC. CONSIDER ADOPTION of Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, an Establishing Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area; and Adopting the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefore. I VD. VACATE Easement, Harvey's Heritage Addition, Lot 3, Block 1 V E. VACATE Easement, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 (Lots 1 & 2, Block 4) & 4 (Lots 1- 3, Block 2) / F. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 748, Johnny Cake Ridge Rd (Street & Utilities) q 5G. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 797, Letendre 1 & 2 Additions (Street & Utilities) aO~H. FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING, Project 798, Canterbury Forest/Wedgewood I" Addition J (Street & Utility Improvements) VI. OLD BUSINESS IA. REVIEW Proposed Amendment to Scope of Project, Project 751 (Dodd Rd, Cliff Rd to 120`s St - Streets & Utilities) n a~ ?B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING & PRELIMINARY IQJ SUBDIVISION - Shelter Corporation. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment amending the use of approximately 17 acres from RC, Retail Commercial to MD, Medium Density Residential, a Rezoning from CSC (Commercial Shopping Center) to PD (Planned Development) and a Preliminary Subdivision/Preliminary Planned Development (Cedar Villas) to create two lots with 158 townhome units, located on the west side of Nicols Road, south of Jerry's Garden Center and north of the Sleep Inn in the NW of Section 30 VII. NEW BUSINESS PQ)q A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - Adams Outdoor Advertising. A Conditional Use Permit to allow a single sided off-premise pylon sign on Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue in the NW of Section 2 ~Q aB. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - Duke Realty Corporation. A Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) of approximately 20.66 acres to create two lots and three outlots, located on the III north side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lockheed Martin in the south '/2 of Section 9 nab. RECEIVE/CONSIDER PETITION, Stop Sign Installation (Diamond Drive and Garnet Lane) VIII. LEGISLATIVE/INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS UPDATE IX. ADMINISTRATIVE AGENDA A. Comments by City Council, City Administrator, and Department Heads X. VISITORS TO BE HEARD (for those persons not on agenda) XI. ADJOURNMENT XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION The City of Eagan is committed to the policy that all persons have equal access to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, disability, age, marital status, sexual orientation, or status with regard to public assistance. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities will be provided upon advance notice of at least 96 hours. If a notice of less than 96 hours is received, the City of Eagan will attempt to provide such aid. u ati MEMO city of eagan MEMO TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 2001 SUBJECT: AGENDA INFORMATION FOR OCTOBER 2, 2001 CITY COUNCIL MEETING ADOPT AGENDA After approval is given to the October 2, 2001 City Council agenda, the following items are in order for consideration. i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting CONSENT AGENDA The following items referred to as consent items require one (1) motion by the City Council. If the City Council wishes to discuss any of the items in further detail, those items should be removed from the Consent Agenda and placed under Old or New Business unless the discussion required is brief. A. APPROVE MINUTES ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the minutes of the September 17, 2001 regular City Council meeting as presented or modified. ATTACHMENTS: • Minutes of the September 17, 2001 regular City Council meeting are enclosed on pages 3 through C2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL Eagan, Minnesota September 17, 2001 A regular meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Monday, September 17, 2001 at 6:30 p.m: at the Eagan Municipal Center. Present were Mayor Awada and Councilmembers Bakken, Carlson, Fields and Tilley. Also present were City Administrator Tom Hedges, Senior Planner Mike Ridley, Director of Public Works Tom Colbert, and City Attorney Mike Dougherty. . AGENDA Mayor Awada, Councilmeipber Till%*W: a :{:$at Items H, I, K; and L be pulled from the % $t Item Y of the Consent Agenda be Consent Agenda for discussion. Public Wotlig•ticeiiK~f: removed from the agenda. Councilmember Tilley moved, Co ember Fields seconded a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS PROCLAM.4;•~;#~DN OF PREVENTION WEEK PROCLAMATION OfATIONyALLEN FIRE FIGHTER WEEK City Administrator Hedges introdub these it4igregarding Fire Prevention Week and National Fallen Fire Fighter Week. Fire Chief Craig Jense4: ,b ir, Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmemtier 15iueii• seCBfided a motion to adopt the City of Eagan's Annual Proclamation declaring October 7 - 13, 2001 as Fire Prevention Week for the City of Eagan. Ayes: 5 Nay: 0 Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Carlson seconded a njotion to adopt a Proclamation proclaiming October 8, 9 and 10 as Fallen Firefighters Memorial Days. ;ay: 0 A Councilmember Bakken moved, Costoiuber Tifky seconded a motion to approve the balance of the consent agenda. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 A. Minutes. It was recommended to approve the minutes of thi'-iitiii'ust 28, 2001 Special City Council meeting, the September 4, 2001 Regular City Council meeting and the September 11, 2001 Special City Council meeting: B. Personnel Items. 1. It was recommended to accept the resignation of William Bruestle, Senior Inspector for the Community Development Department. 2. It was recommended to approve the rpf~nthony Lejcher, Matthew Ondrey and Sean Sweeney as police officers for the City of Eagan Polic 3. It was recommended to approve t1* g o •are~st City Clerk /Administrative Services Coordinator. 4. It was recommended to approve tlw. }firing of (Qpen Mathiason as a temporary preschool program instructor RN. . for the Parks and Recreational Deient. 5. It was recommended to approve tTs q.i`idf,{$s.ynda Speikers and Cynthia Whitacre as temporary preschool assistants fo't$ir'Y~S~aiiif'1+Ed>z: tepartment. 6. It was recommended to approve the hiring of Cyndi Huonder and Lori Huckle as seasonal preschool • instructors for the Parks and Recreation Department. 7. It was recommended to approve the hiring of David Schomburg, Brad Champlin and Bruce Berry as temporary basketball scorekeepers for the F,atits and Recreation Department. 8. It was recommended to approve the t qn, Jeff Freeman and Ken Freeman as football officials for the Parks and RecreatimiW"' ieht.% Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes September 17, 2001 Page 2 C. Shows License. It was recommended to approve a Shows License for Starks Halfway House Saloon for Saturday, September 22, 2001 at 3125 Dodd Road. D. Name Change - On Sale Beer License. It was recommended,to approve a name change for an ON-Sale Beer License from Park-view Golf Club, LLC to Parkview Golf Holdings, LLC. E. Alternative Urban Areawide Review. It was recommended to approve the Resolution / Order to initiate an Alternative Urban Areawide Review for thrQtdar Grove Redevelopment Area. F. >A►uditinQ Servic6s. It was recommended td; rove the engagement letter with Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. to provide auditing services for the year endiflecember 31, 2001. G. Final Subdivision - TCA. It was recommQ r 'RX%"bdivision (Tran4port America Addition) lcg;_q{ot?iid in the SE of Section 8. located at the intersection of Terminal Dri J. Proiect 668. Lone Oak Road Final Assessment Roll. It was recommended to receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 668 (Lone Oak Road Reconstr[irijapn / Upgrade - Lexington Avenue to Highway 55 / 149) and schedule a public hearing to be held on OoiQlier 16, 2001. M. Project 759R. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 759R (Beau D'Rue - Street and Trail Improvements) by the City's consulting engineering firm of Short - Elliot-Henrickson, Inc. N. Project 801. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 801 (Silver Bell Road - Street Improvements) by the: ;Ws consulting engineering firm of WSB & Associates (WSB). 0. Project 794. It was recommended to auth&." the pre lion of a Feasibility Report for Project 794 (River Hills 9' Addition - Street Improvements) by t):se;ity's cojting engineering firm of WSB &Associates. P. Project 795. It was recommended to aut] a the pr tation of a Feasibility Report for Project 795 (Beacon Hill, Brittany ? - 6' Additions, Johnny Ca,4_ .Ai,dFA Yh Additions, and Covington Lane - Street Improvements) by the City of Eagan Enoj,2 'd Q. Project 796. It was recommended to autfiori~e tlie'pfdpatatibe'okxeasibility Report for Project 796 (Cedar Cliff Additions and Mari Acres Additions - Street Improvements) by the City's consulting engineering firm of WSB & Associates. R. Project 851. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Traffic Study and Feasibility Report for Project 851 (Town Centre, Denmark Avenue, Duckwood Drive, Krestwood Lane, Crestridge Dirve - Street and Trail Improvements) by the City's consulting engineering farm of Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. S. Project 852. It was recommended to authorize the prep,3ratti?7tic easibility Report for Project 852 (Post Additions, Rustic Hills Drive, and Oster Drjyp.%: eoT;# irbvements) by the City's consulting engineering firm of WSB & Associates. T. Project 853. It was recommended to autlioriz,~e preparaeln of a Feasibility Report for Project 853 (Woodgate ? Addition - Street Improvements) by the: 3lji a ~ .ftineering Division. U. Project 854. It was recommended to authorize th'e' %of a Feasibili ty Report for Project 854 (Parkcliff 1'- 3rd Additions -Street Improvements) by the City of2}i3 ineering Division. V. Project 855. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of Feasibility Report for Project-855 (Oak Chase 4' and 6`" Additions and Ches Mar East ? - 5`s Additions - Street Improvements) by the City of Eagan Engineering Division. W. Project 856. It was recommended to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report for Project 856 (Ches Mar 1" - 5' Additions - Street Improvements) bey the City of Eagan Engineering Division. X. Effress Addition Easement Vacation. It,t:fcq!Igmen&>ive the petition to vacate public drainage and utility easements and schedule a publit.)4~g'~3beM$ A-*[$(ober 16, 2001. Y. Contract 01-04. The ro osed Amen t to Aw *°'Contract 01-04 Central Parkwa / Northwood Parkway p P t ( Y Y & Community Center- Street, UtilitX.~ Grading Wrovements) was removed from the agenda with no action taken due to lack of required easeme.... Z. Project 858. It was recommended to tit4: 41 Fart orize the preparation of a feasibility report by the City Engineer for Project 858 (Siik- Storm Sewer Improvements). AA. Projects 00-H & 00-I. It was recommended to approve the extension of the development contract for Pinetree Pass 5' Addition and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. BB. Contract 00-07. It was recommended to approve Change Order No. 7 to Contract 00-07 (Trunk Highway 13 - Divided Four-Lane Upgrade) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. • CC. Contract Ol-O1. It was recommended.'i;stg~fb6#;ayment for Contract0l-O1 (Letenddre Addition, Canterbury Forest and Wedgewoodition - Stree~•}tovements) in the amount of $24,947.70 to Northwest Asphalt and accept the itp48vements for perpelis City maintenance subject to warranty provisions. ..s .;.s u Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes September 17, 2001 Page 3 DD. Contract 01-02. It was recommended to approve the final payment for Contract 01-02 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Street Overlay) in the amount of $78,718.34 to McNamara Contracting, Inc., and accept the improvement for perpetual City maintenance subject to wa ranty provisions. EE. Contract - Dispatch Services. It was recommended to approve the 2001 annual contract renewal for the City of Eagan providing dispatch services to the City of Rosemount Police and Fire Departments. ! Items pulled from the Consent Agenda: H. Final Subdivision - Manley Addition. :;:;::;ti;:;:; yr; . City Administrator Hedges introducr,~# t#tS,S tXe subdivision for Manley Addition to create 30 lots on 13 acres located south of Cliff Ro. west of Roai A previous condition placed on the approval of the Preliminary Subdivision rega the upgrade of Dodd Road was discussed. Mayor Awada moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to approve a Final Subdivision (Manley Addition) to create 30 lots on 13 acres located south of Cliff Road and west of Dodd Road in the iiorthwest of Section 36. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 I. Aerial Platform Fire Truck. City Administrator Hedges discuss 41is item f.rding the purchase of an aerial platform fire truck. He discussed methods of financing for thepr,'QSosed pine of the truck. ' Councilmember Carlson moved , Cquucilpiep313s Tilley seconded a motion to approve the bid presented by Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. in the amounfi 1 platform fire truck with the method of payment being out of general fund balance. • Aye''' S''''Ta%~f}'~ • • • • • • • . K. Project 799. Mayor Awada stated she would be abstaining from consideration of the Final Assessment Roll for Project 799 (Eagandale Center Industrial Park - Street Overlay) and the scheduling of a public hearing to be held on October 16, 2001 due to a conflict of interest as a potentially assessed property. Councilmember Bakken took over as Acting Mayor for the discussion of this it=.-.. Acting Mayor Bakken moved, CounciknRi}o:ed a motion to receive the Final Assessment Roll for Project 799 (Eagandale Center.Industri~tj I? L~e:~•$ifeet Ov> ay) and schedule a public hearing to be held on October 16, 2001. Aye: 4 Nay 0 Abstain: ,1, • i L. Project 850. City Administrator Hedges discusse~•tis~ioKyding Project 850 Dodd Road, (Diffley Road to Ethan Drive) Street and Trail Improvements. He stated t 2A;;kti:Aponse to the Council's directive of September 4, a feasibility report has been prepared and is now Nihig presented to the Council for their consideration of scheduling a public hearing for October 16, 2001. , A petition was distributed to the Council from residents in the Bradford Ct, Bradford Circle and Welland j Ct neighborhoods requesting the extension of the proposed improvements north to Elrene Rd/Coventry Dr. Several residents spoke both in favor and against th~X Vopos~.~ gnd trail improvements. Discussion occurred regarding the schedule and location of a g:Abi};-:;project, the historical perspective of Dodd Road, and other petitions received. Mayof jvada staf hi= felt these issues should bt discussed at the public hearing. She went on to explain that magy Fgsidents in t area had requested the upgrade, which is the reason for i the project being brought forward for a hearin Mayor Awada moved, Councilri;bY:F!}g,:motion to receive the feasibility report for Project 850 and schedule a public hearing to be held on October ~6'. 2001. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 PUBLIC HEARINGS VARIANCE .R CINDY HOLMSTEN City Administrator Hedges intrthis item reg a variance request of 12 feet into the required 30 ' foot building setback from public right-d'y for Lot 45, Bloo11~:;~ Hills of Stonebridge, located at 743 Cheshire Court: Senior Planner Ridley gave a stW~eport. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes September 17, 2001 Page 4 Mayor Awada opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, Mayor Awada closed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. • Councilmdmber Carlson moved, Cot; `member Fields seconded a motion to approve a variance of 12 foot into the required 30 foot building setback fioin public right-of-way for Lot 45, Block 7, Hills of Stonebridge, located at 743 Cheshire Court in the SW of,,9tot0 VARIANC ,...S)~kCTf bWfbf0'LMPMENT City Administrator Hedges introduc$this item regarding a variance to allow 9 foot parking stall widths on Lots 1'2, and 3, Block 1, Spectrum Business Park, located on Blue Gentian Road. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. Mayor Awada opened the public hearing. There being no public comment, lvfr AwadQsed the public hearing and turned discussion back to the Council. ' Councilmember Tilley moved, Coupeil~l~rt~hCr Melds seconded a motion to approve a variance to allow 9 foot parking stall widths on Lots 1, 2, and 3i;y f .;etik~,''$s Park, located on Blue Gentian Road between Trunk Highway 55 and Blue Water RbeB'iri•tl~t'~Y'6 on 2. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND -UTILITY EASEMENT LEXINGTON POINTE 14"H ADDITION, LOT 13, BLOCK 1 City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regardingt)W;vacation of a public drainage and utility easement on Lot 13, Block 1, Lexington Pointe 14'h A#pod-:::pk rtfC-*orks Director Colbert gave a staff report. eie beit'no public comment, she closed the public hearing Mayor Awada opened the public b" and turned discussion back to the Council. Councilmember Bakken moved, Councilmen 6et;3:W4*.- sPConded a motion to approve the vacation of a public drainage and utility easement in Lexington Pointe 14"'`f►dclittKs, Lot 13, Block 1) and authorize the Mayor ad Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. Aye: 5 Nay: PROJECT 748 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING - JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD (STREETS AND UTILITIES) This item was noted to be continuqtt q:t' ti&pr 2jW.k.,.q* a agenda. VACATION OF Rjh$IC DRAWGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT (EAGANDALNTER,IUSTRIAL PARK NOS. 3 & 4) • This item was noted to be contui agenda. . ~ ~ of v. •'J1i. Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes September 17, 2001 Page 5 OLD BUSINESS AMENDMENT TO AWARD OF CONTRACT 01-14 (STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS) City Administrator Hedges introducq4;Abis item regarding an amendment to the Award of Contract 01-14. Public Works Director Colbert gave a brief stj aport. Mayor Awada inquired about the status of any remaining projects proposed under this contract. } :per. Councilmember Tilley moved, Cott }cs t it i; ~~o~ded a motion to •approve an amendment to award of Contract 01-14 (Storm Mitigation I; ro'vemerifs'='lt%1t'sc # 1, 4, 5, & 10) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all relatedpiments. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 AMENDMENT TO AWARD OF CONTRACT 01-15 (STORM MITIGATION EVIPROVEMENTS) City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding an amendment to the Award of Contract 01-15. Public Works Director Colbert gave a brief $ report. Mayor Awada inquired about the status of any remaining projects proposed under this contract. Councilmember Tilley moved, Cpicihnembi:Wields seconded a motion to approve an amendment to award of Contract 01-15 (Storm Mitigarion,>lnprpvemeW Misc. Areas # 6, 7 & 8) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related doc{r~tiet''+'.t;~rz NEW BUSINESS ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CHAPTER 10, SECTION 10.31 City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding o;amendment to Chapter 10, Section 10.31 regarding noise. Police Chief Therkelsen stated the ameRdT}t:Citended to facilitate easier enforcement of noise violations resulting from electronic soun.Qc;ray$j' Councilmember Fields moved, C'Ounciknember Tile seconded a motion to approve an ordinance amending Chapter 10, Section 10.31 regard-i%*` ons. Aye: 5 Nay: 0 CONSIDER PROFESSION AL'~'fiR GOLF COURSE City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding the possibility of conducting a community poll on the development of a golf course. Councilmember Tilley moved, Councilmember Fields seconded a motion to direct staff to conduct a professional/scientific community poll regaK.p$ A%lopmept9f.4. If course. Council and City Administrator: e3ges dis O • j ~&e proposed poll and the role of the Golf Course Exploratory Committee. Administrator Mi ges statedWR it is imperative to keep the process of the poll and the process of the Exploratory Committee e* c with ether. Information will be brought back to the next • Council meeting regarding costs and the i pt.quaS gikto J2 ipcluded in the poll. The suggestions of the Exploratory Committee will be shared w3ds,S3;,fC,dSr, uncilmember Carlson stated she felt the poll was an excellent idea but input needs to come from the Ezp~'oi'dfi3ry Committee, as well as from other public groups. She stated that the Council should try to stay out of the process as much as possible and allow the Committee to have the vast amount of input. Mayor Awada moved, CouncilmembeT;E,-' si rpnded a friendly amendment to Councilmember Tilley's motion to read as follows: Direct staff to. }tc}~S~ ' ' ' °O'da /scientific community poll regarding development of a golf course, with input;.. W."the Golf Cot qq ploratory Committee and the PEPPC Group in' relation to questions to be asked in the pd#i~ r review by CouriWt the October 2, 2001 Aye: 5 Nay: 0 I Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes September 17, 2001 Page 6 COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AM0Wft311ENT, REZONING AND PRELEANARY SUBDIVISION - • SER CORPORATION City Administrator Hedges introduceA.:y9n, • a; rehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Retail Commercial to Medium Density Resido&~l~i~~¢~yt(g ::unary Planned Development and Preliminary Subdivision (Cedar Villas). He sjatt,d that severs? b=Yhafl'h~essages had been received regarding this issue and were forwarded to Council. Seniot#~binner Ridley gave a staff report. Jay Jensen, Shelter Corporation, made a presentation regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment, overall development goals and property management. Mark Ulfers, Dakota County CDA discussed the project, stating that should the project be approved by Council, it would not be completed until their 2004. He discussed the cost of each unit and the affordable housing status in Eagan. Patty Hurd, representative for M1C agan and * " kesperson for the group asked that members of the audience that are in favor of the proposed prc*p. t,iq,St4n~;:'Ihe majority of the audience stood. Ms. Hurd went on to discuss the need for increased affordable ,33sagsi;;• • • • Approximately 12 residents spoke in favor of the proposed project. Council discussed items including siding of the buildings, garages, private streets, monitoring of parking, unlicensed vehicles, etc., and density. Councilmember Carlson and Mayor Awada stated t t-'1R p:4lortion of the proposed units should be available for sale. They stated there is a need,fgr..c ;i 'A Ex. abfe•reatal housing, but affordable ownership as well. They also stated they felt the three be'iligVC 4f~s'sfioulrfave two car garages rather than one. Councilmembers Tilley and Fields sitifei#;sb Btee•}p favor of the concept and would like to work with Shelter Corporation and the CDA. Councilmember Bakken expressed concern over lack of trglways on Nicols Road. He also discussed the . fiscal aspects of the project and the possibility of commercial property being located on part of the parcel. He stated that more time is needed to work out the issues. Mr. Jensen stated he is willing to consider the ownership issue but stated he did not feel that commercial would work on the site. He stated he was :bb:waive dio-U:,day Agency Action Requirement. . • Mayor Awada moved, Councilr~i~er Bakl js:; Bonded a motion to continue consideration of a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment om RC (Rend ommercial) to MD (Medium Density Residential) and a Rezoning / Preliminary Planned Developi." and Pr ary Subdivision for Shelter Corporation to the October 2, 2001 meeting and direct Councihnemlii GzdsoR;t : tp Work with the applicant. Aye: 5 -Nay 0 VISITORS T(f'W'JE#1~ARD Doris Dahlene, 3830 Alder Lane, read a letter she submitted to the Council in December, 2000 regarding her home not being included in a proposed TIF district. Mayor Awada stated she would like to discuss with Ms. Dahline the possibility of her house being movet}*cF t. ADJOUR 4".T ' The meeting adjourned at 10:V*M- ti Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes September 17, 2001 Page 7 Date Deputy City Clerk If you need these minutes in an alternative foj%j:j~ch as large print, Braille, audio tape, etc., please contact the City of Eagan, 3830 Pilot Knob Road, Eagan, but 2, (651) 681-4600, (TDD phone: (651) 454-8535). The City of Eagan is committed to the policy-;;q.Yxaccess to its programs, services, activities, facilities and employment without regard to tional origin, sex, disability, age, sexual orientation, marital status or status with regard:tq public assistance. f .;.L Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PERSONNEL ITEMS Item 1. GIS Intern-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Greg Schauer as a GIS Intern. Item 2. Cascade Bay/Civic Arena Maintenance Worker-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the hiring of Kevin Kinney as a Cascade Bay/Civic Arena maintenance worker. Item 3. Resignation/Clerical Technician III/Community Development-- ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To accept the resignation of Holly McGraw, Clerical Technician III in Community Development. u Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001, Eagan City Council CONSENT AGENDA: C. TEMPORARY LIQUOR LICENSE FAITHFUL SHEPHERD CATHOLIC SCHOOL ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Temporary Liquor License for Faithful Shepherd Catholic School for a Silent Auction Event to be held on January 26, 2002 and waive fees. FACTS: • Kathelina Draves, Food and Entertainment Chairperson of Faith Shepherd Catholic School, has requested a temporary liquor license for a silent auction event to be held at Faithful Shepherd Catholic School on January 26, 2002. • All proceeds from the event will go to the support of the school. • They are also requesting the application fee of $150 be waived. • Staff has reviewed the application and deem it in order. ATTACHMENTS: • Application and letter is attached without page number. Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting D. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To schedule the public hearing for certification of delinquent utility bills for November 8, 2001. FACTS: • Twice a year, in April and October, the City initiates certification of utility bills delinquent more than 30 days past due to the owners' property taxes. • There are 383 utility accounts totaling $55,820.44 to be certified to the property taxes. u Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting E. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CERTIFICATION OF DELINQUENT FALSE ALARM BILLINGS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To schedule the public hearing for certification of delinquent false alarm billings for November 8, 2001. FACTS: • Twice a year, in April and October, the City initiates certification of delinquent false alarm bills to the owners' property taxes. • There are 20 false alarm bills totaling $3,967.50 to be certified to the property taxes. /3 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting F. SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING FOR CERTIFICATION OF DELINOUENT NOXIOUS WEED CUTTING BILLS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To schedule the public hearing for certification of delinquent noxious weed cutting billings for November 8, 2001. FACTS: • Twice a year, in April and October, the City initiates certification of delinquent noxious weed cutting bills to the owners' property taxes. • There is one weed cutting bill totaling $155.00 to be certified to the property taxes. /Y i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting G. APPROVE 2002 FUNDING APPLICATION TO DAKOTA COUTY FOR THE COMMUNITY LANDFILL ABATEMENT FUNDS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the submission of the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan 2002 Funding Application for $85,936 from Dakota County to operate a Recycling Program for the Cities of Burnsville and Eagan. FACTS: • Dakota County has funds available annually to help constituent cities promote and operate landfill abatement programs. • The Cities of Burnsville and Eagan combined their recycling program as of March 2000. • The Cities of Burnsville and Eagan have prepared one application for both cities that will be submitted to Dakota County. • The application for the 2002 Community Landfill Abatement Program follows Dakota County's solid waste guidelines and recommendations. i Agenda Information Memo September 28, 2001 Eagan City Council H. DIRECT PREPARATION OF ORDINANCE AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 11 TO PROVIDE FOR WASTE TRANSFER STATIONS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment to Chapter 11 to provide for waste transfer stations as a conditional use in the I-1 (Limited Industrial) zoning district. FACTS: • There has recently been interest expressed in the establishment of a waste transfer station in Eagan. Such use is currently not regulated in the city ordinance. • The City Council may initiate an amendment to the zoning ordinance by directing staff and the City Attorney to prepare an amendment for public hearing. • The amendment to be drafted would provide for waste transfer stations as a conditional use in the I-1, Limited Industrial, zoning district. ATTACHMENTS: None /6 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001, Eagan City Council 1. FINAL SUBDIVISION (FOUR PAWS ADDITION) - FOUR PAWS PET RESORT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a Final Subdivision (Four Paws Addition) to create one lot and one outlot on 5.54 acres located east and west of Hwy. 13 on Old Sibley Memorial Hwy. and adjacent to Burnsville in the SW 1/4 of Section 19 FACTS: • The Council approved the preliminary subdivision on June 19, 2001. • All necessary documents are in order for execution at the regular meeting of the City Council on October 2, 2001. ATTACHMENTS: Final Plat, page 4& MI W. FLAT i N o as ~ ~ a ~ H 1011 rk l ` HWV pp, 11 w SFUNK W ~ lit 3 $ Y y i iii in I; YJ jai 0 v i:. •~,g, all sm X10, CO! Q O yrF ~0~+ b~ I Y AV, W ` s• £T 23~y ~ bid I r M •J • \ a=~;. 100 s•• \ .itl_. M'Zt9 .9Z,ZOd9l ,n. r.. 1T'I itYisU.IO •~f-IYM wV 1wI { tK{ ]L .14V1m Mia .ltIV4 ~]Lp,. I Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting J. APPROVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT 2246 CLARK STREET ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the acquisition agreement for 2246 Clark Street. FACTS: • The single-family residential property at 2246 Clark Street was among the homes identified by the City Council to be considered for acquisition and renovation as a result of the July 7-8, 2000 super storm. • The City has reached an agreement with the homeowner at 2246 Clark Street for the purchase of their property. • Final details of the purchase agreement are being worked out and a final signed copy will be presented to the Council prior to the regular meeting. • The funding of this acquisition project will be provided as part of the $5 million disaster relief funding provided by the 2001 Minnesota Legislature. l9 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting K. APPROVE PURCHASE AGREEMENT 4185 STRAWBERRY LANE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the acquisition agreement for 4185 Strawberry Lane. FACTS: • The single-family residential property at 4185 Strawberry Lane was among the homes identified by the City Council to be considered for acquisition and renovation as a result of the July 7-8, 2000 super storm. • The City has reached an agreement with the homeowner at 4185 Strawberry Lane for the purchase of their property. • Final details of the purchase agreement are being worked out and a final signed copy will be presented to the Council prior to the regular meeting. • The funding of this acquisition project will be provided as part of the $5 million disaster relief funding provided by the 2001 Minnesota Legislature. 0o i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 L. PROJECT 771. LEXINGTON AVENUE DIVIDED FOUR-LANE UPGRADE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve an Easement Agreement for Project 771 (Lexington Avenue - Divided Four-Lane Upgrade) with the owner of Parcel 10-84500-010-01 (Studio 3345) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The City of Eagan is the lead agency in partnership with the Dakota County Highway Department in the upgrade of Lexington Avenue (CSAH 43) to a four-lane divided highway between Lone Oak Road and Yankee Doodle Road and includes the installation of new traffic control signals at the intersections of Northwood Parkway/Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Clubview Drive. • The upgrade of Lexington Avenue required the acquisition of numerous permanent and temporary easements from the adjacent properties. • Appraisals were obtained for all required easements. The appraisal of the easements for said property indicated a value of $17,800. In order to settle and avoid additional costs in attorney fees and commissioner's hearings, staff has suggested an offer of $20,000 as an appropriate alternative. The property owner has consented to this offer. • An agreement between the City of Eagan and the owner of Studio 3345 has been prepared providing for the payment of the acquisition of all necessary easements. • Engineering staff and the City Attorney's office have reviewed this agreement and found it to be in order for favorable Council action. ISSUES: • The property owner has requested an immediate resolution to the easement acquisition. However, staff has not received the fully executed agreement at the writing of this report. If the agreement is not received prior to the City Council meeting, staff will request removal of said item from the October 2 agenda. • If the City Council would desire to discuss this item, it would be appropriate to withhold discussion until the Executive Session. i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 M. PROJECT 800, CEDAR GROVE ACCESS MODIFICATIONS COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the resolution requesting funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement for Project 800 (Cedar Grove Access Modifications - Street Improvements) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The reconfiguration of Silver Bell Road, from TH 13 to Beau D'Rue, as well as the combining of the intersections of Cedarvale Boulevard with Beau D'Rue, a new traffic signal at this new intersection and necessary utility improvements, as presented in the Village Plaza study for the redevelopment of the Cedar Grove (Cedarvale) area, is programmed for 2002 in the 5-Year CIP (2002-2006). • On February 6, 2001, the City Council approved Project 800 and authorized the preparation of final plans and specifications. • The reconfiguration of the intersection of Silver Bell Road and Trunk Highway 13 would include traffic and access management improvements providing benefit to the operation of TH 13 and requested by MnDOT during the recently completed TH 13 improvements (Contract 00-07). • Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2003. If the funding application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2002. a~ Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 N. PROJECT 859, TH 55/LEXINGTON AVEBLUE GENTIAN ROAD COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the resolution requesting funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement for Project 859 (TH 55, Lexington Avenue, Blue Gentian Road - Intersection Reconfiguration) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The development of the area adjacent to Blue Gentian Road and Blue Water Road, including the Grand Oak Business Park and Spectrum Commerce Center, required the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) in lieu of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) due to the projected impact on the adjacent transportation system. The Council approved AUAR recommended transportation improvements on the TH 55/TH 149/1-494 corridors related to the development of this area over a 20-year period. • The reconfiguration of the intersection of TH 55, Lexington Avenue (County Road 43) and Blue Gentian Road, including traffic signal improvements, was recommended in the AUAR as one of the first development related transportation improvements. • The completion of the extension and realignment of Blue Gentian Road is needed for access to the Spectrum Commerce Center that is currently under construction with a scheduled completion date of November 15, 2001. • On September 4, 2001, the City Council awarded Contract 01-06 (Blue Gentian Road - Street and Utility Improvements) to Danner Inc. • Blue Gentian Road is a Municipal State Aid Street (MSAS) and is eligible for construction funding through the gas tax program. As such, it had to receive MnDOT State Aid Division approval before the Council awarded the contract. • In order to get MnDOT approval, a compromise was reached as a result of a mutli-agency meeting to address the connection of the new Blue Gentian Road to Highway 55. The compromised agreement involved the AUAR recommended intersection reconfiguration. • Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2003. If the funding application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2002. C.3 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 0. PROJECT 860, TH 55/BLUE WATER ROAD COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT RESOLUTION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the resolution requesting funding from the Minnesota Department of Transportation through a cooperative agreement for Project 860 (TH 55 and Blue Water Road - Intersection Reconfiguration) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The development of the area adjacent to Blue Gentian Road and Blue Water Road, including the Grand Oak Business Park and Spectrum Commerce Center, required the preparation of an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) in lieu of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) due to the projected impact on the adjacent transportation system. The Council approved AUAR recommended transportation improvements on the TH 55/TH 149/1-494 corridors related to the development of this area over a 20-year period. • The reconfiguration of the intersection of TH 55 and Blue Water Road, including traffic signal improvements, was recommended in the AUAR as one of the first development related transportation improvements. • On September 14, 1998, the City Council directed staff to prepare a feasibility report considering the installation of a new traffic control signal at the intersection of TH 55 and Blue Water Road, along with access management improvements along TH 55 (Project 750R). • On March 20, 2001, Project 750R was canceled due to Dart Transit's lack of support for the revenue proposal in the feasibility report and their desire to pursue alternative solutions for the access of their property to Trunk Highway 55. • The completion of the Spectrum Commerce Center, currently under construction with a scheduled completion date of November 15, 2001, includes 1750 parking stalls. • A review of the current development of the area in relationship to the AUAR recommendations indicates it would be appropriate to proceed with the Blue Water/TH 55 intersection reconfiguration. • Approval of the resolution will allow the City to apply for MnDOT funding through the Local Initiative Municipal Agreements Program for fiscal year (FY) 2003. If the funding application is successful, a contract could be awarded after July 1, 2002. a~ Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 P. CLIFF LAKE ROAD & KYLE WAY TRAFFIC CONTROL STUDY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the petition and authorize the preparation of a traffic control study by the City Engineer for the intersection of Cliff Lake Road and Kyle Way/ CUB Food's driveway entrance. FACTS: • On September 17, 2001, at the City Council's Listening Session, Jack Puterbaugh, resident at 1931 Jan Echo Trail, submitted a petition from residents in the Cliff Lake Townhomes neighborhood requesting a traffic control analysis of the intersection of Cliff Lake Road and Kyle Way (a private street) and the Cliff Lake Center commercial driveway entrance adjacent to Cub Foods. The residents' concerns are mainly regarding pedestrian safety across Cliff Lake Road between the Cliff Lake Townhomes and Cliff Lake Centre. • It would be appropriate for the City Council to formally authorize the City Engineer to prepare a traffic control study to analyze necessary traffic control improvements, if any, and define the scope, cost, schedule and method of financing for the improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Petition, pages through • Location Map, page. as 1931 Jan Echo Trail Eagan, MN 55122 August 21, 2001 RECEIVED Mayor Patricia Awada AUG 2 4 2001 Eagan Municipal Center 3830 Pilot Knob Road EAGAN Eagan, MN 55122 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Dear Mayor Awada: Please find attached a Petition that has been signed by the writer of this letter and several of my neighbors who live in the Cliff Lake Townhouse project. The names of other owners and residents could have been obtained, but since a prior petition with some sixty names went unheeded, it seemed that further effort would have been a waste of time. The failure of Eagan city government to acknowledge receipt of communications represents a rather arrogant and cavalier attitude. Anyway, since the Planning Commission and City Council failed to address pedestrian safety at the intersection described in the Petition when the Cliff Lake Townhouse project was approved, it is now time for you and the council to correct a failure of the past. Or, are you waiting for someone to be killed at this intersection before interest of city government is piqued? Enclosed is a clipping from the Pioneer Press of August 18`, that describes what happens when city government does not act responsibly-a dead 15 year old. As an aside, maybe you can also explain why the intersection of Deerwood and Blackhawk Road is now controlled by the installation of through stop signs. Do you think it is possible to get a review of the enclosed Petition, and to receive a report back from the city? If you're short of stamps let me know and I'll furnish you with a SASE. Very Truly yours, Jack Puterbaugh (651) 452-6730 cc: Councilmember Paul Bakken; Councilmember Peggy Carlson; Councilmember Cyndee Fields; Councilmember Meg Tilley; Amy Sherman, Pioneer Press C~6 PETITION TO THE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL: We the undersigned property owners and residents of the city of Eagan hereby request and demand that appropriate steps be initiated to ensure pedestrian safety at the intersection of Cliff Lake Road at Kyle Way and the entrance to the Cub Foods parking area. The failure of city officials, both elected and appointed, to ensure pedestrian safety at this intersection, either by the installation of four-way thru stop signs or a traffic semaphore, is tantamount to dereliction of duty. It is anticipated that this petition will result in appropriate corrective action being taken. NAME ADDRESS 11A THW Bra yyi~ FACMvti y Al a I-) J AAA EJ,n T(jA I la-~o 44 Kzv 149 Gf *c.~.o ~ q $0 Toa ,I i~ty 3 Jan LVx07ra-1( ty, J c;2Y Q 9-28-01 SCALE 1" = 100' may 4) Y Jan Echo Tr. CLIFF EKE Existing Crosswalk q CUB FOODS Parking J Cliff Lae Road & Kyle Way Sept. 28, 01 City of Eagan Location Map Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Q. CONTRACT 01-07. LEXINGTON AVENUE DIVIDED FOUR-LANE UPGRADE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Change Order No. 2 to Contract 01-07 (Lexington Avenue - Divided Four-Lane Upgrade) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Contract 01-07 provides for the upgrade of Lexington Avenue (CSAH 43) to a four-lane divided highway between Lone Oak Road and Yankee Doodle Road and includes the installation of new traffic control signals at the intersections of Northwood Parkway/Neil Armstrong Boulevard and Clubview Drive. • The revisions detailed in the change order address a change in the scope of work and additional work adjacent to the US Postal Service property. • Change Order No. 2 addresses the reinsertion of contract bid items impacting the USPS property in to the construction work plan after City staff had directed the contractor to delete said items from the work plan. The direction to originally delete the items was based on the failure to acquire the necessary easements from the USPS. • City staff originally contacted USPS representatives in September 2000. Several meetings, teleconferences, written correspondences and telephone communications occurred between September 2000 and September 2001. The USPS finally agreed to allow the contractor access to USPS property on September 14, 2001. The City was not able to acquire the needed USPS earlier through the Eminent Domain process. • The work items needed to be completed to provide a finished appearance to the project. Driveway work, fence relocation, storm drainage and trail improvements were all included as original bid items that were delayed due to the lack of cooperation from the USPS. In order to complete these items, the contractor and his subcontractors had to remobilize. • Change Order No. 2 includes the repetitive stockpiling and eventual removal of earthen material planned to be placed on the USPS Bulk Mail Center property. The filling and grading of material excavated from the public right-of-way onto the Bulk Mail Center site was included in the Council approved final plans. • The cost of the additional work is consistent with bid prices for relevant bid items on other projects within the city. • This change order has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. • The change order provides for an additional cost of $41,220.00 (0.99% of original contract). The associated costs will be the responsibility of the Dakota County Highway Department (55%) and the City's Major Street Fund (45%). ATTACHMENTS: • Change Order No. 2, pages,-3,Lthrough 30 CITY OF EAGAN CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT 01-07 CHANGE ORDER 2 PROJECT 771 DATE: September 21, 2001 PROJECT NAME: Lexington Avenue (CSAH 43) Street Improvements PROJECT DESCRIPTION: CONTRACTOR: McNamara Contracting ENGINEER: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 5001 160m Street West 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 200 Rosemount, MN 55068 Minnetonka. MN 55343 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE ORDER WORK: Section A - Change of project scope at the USPS facilities. Section B - Additional work generated by Contractor JUSTIFICATION FORIPURPOSE OF CHANGE ORDER: Section A - On August 5, 2001, the Contractor was advised that certain contract items for improvements to the USPS properties were being deleted from the contract due to the inability to obtain the associated easements and the right of entry. Negotiations still continued between Eagan Staff and USPS and, on September 14, 2001, an agreement was finally reached and the right of entry was granted. The Contractor was then directed to complete certain previously deleted items to the USPS properties so as to obtain minimum requirements for the bituminous trail and parking lot entrance improvements. The Contractor responded and agreed to complete the changes for the contract bid prices but also asked to be additionally compensated for this work due to project timing, remobilizing equipment and manpower and incurring a substantial financial loss from other related deleted contract items. SEH, Inc. and Eagan Engineering Staff concur with the negotiated unit price for labor and equipment for this additional compensation. Section B - Due to the lack of easement at the USPS property, the Contractor was forced to stockpile soils in front of the USPS property. In order to accommodate utility relocations and various other construction activities, these stockpiles had to be moved several times. The Contractor worked around the USPS property as much as possible until he reached a point of immobility. The Contractor kept close records of the amounts of re-grading that he performed. SEH, Inc and Eagan Engineering Staff also kept track of this additional work and concur with the dollar amount and the negotiated unit price that the Contractor is requesting for additional compensation. QCHANGE ORDERS/2001101-07 02 Lexington Avenue 31 DESCRIPTION OF WORK ITEMS: Section A Contract Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Quantity Amount Labor and Equipment HR 42.5 $400.00 42.5 $17,000.00 Total Section A $17,000.00 Section B Contract Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Quantity Amount 2105.501 Common Excavation CY 3,460' $7.00 3,460 $24,220.00 Total Section B $24,220.00 Total Section A $17,000.00 Total Section B $24,220.00 Total Change Order No. 1 $41,220.00 CONTRACT STATUS TIME/COMPLETION DATE AMOUNT Original Contract: August 15, 2002 $4,175,117.24 Change Order: No Change/August 15, 2002 $41,220.00 Subtotal of Previous Change Orders: $9,429.49 This Change Order: $41,220.00 New Subtotal of All Change Orders: $50,649.49 Revise Contract: 4,225,766.73 Percent Increase or Decrease for this Change Order to Original Contract Amount: .99% Percent Increase or Decrease for Total of All Change Orders to Original Contract Amount: 1.21% RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: Q1 By: t Project Manager tractor By: Date: City Department Manager City of Eagan Council Action: Mayor: Clerk: Date: DISTRIBUTION 1 -City 2 - Contractor I -Engineer 'Additional grading due to lack of easement at USPS property. NAEAGAN\0001 \Const\CO 2.&c 2 3a Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 R. PROJECT 861, 2002 CITYWIDE TRAILS IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Authorize the preparation of a feasibility report by the City Engineer for Project 861 (2002 Citywide Trail Improvements). FACTS: • On June 5, 2001, the City Council approved the Public Works Department's 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (2002-2006) for the City of Eagan. This included approximately 8.1 miles of various sidewalk and trail impreovments broken out as follows: • The trail improvements identified in the CIP to be installed as part of a greater roadway improvement include the following locations: Beau De Rue (Nicols Rd. - Silver Bell Rd.) - Proj. 759R South Side (3870 FT) Town Centre Drive (Duckwood - Denmark) - Proj. 851 West Side (2600 FT) Dodd Road (Diffley - Ethan/ Camberwell) - Proj. 850 Both Sides (1050 FT) • The new trail segment improvements identified in the CIP to be installed under a separate project include the following locations: Thomas Lake Road (Thomas Center Dr. - Diffley) West Side (4600 FT) • The existing trail improvements identified in the CIP for a maintenance overlay include the following locations: Northview Park Road (Lexington - Braddock) South Side (4230 FT) Braddock Trail (Diffley - Northview Park Rd) West Side (2850 FT) Coachman Road (Yankee Doodle - Four Oaks Rd) Both Sides (6890 FT) Four Oaks Road (TH 13 - Coachman Rd) South Side (1380 FT) Lone Oak Road (Egan - Lexington Ave) North Side (4000 FT) Wescott Road (Lexington - Saddle Wood Dr) South Side (6670 FT) Wescott Road (Pilot Knob - Westbury Dr) South Side (4670 FT) • Based on this CIP schedule, it would be appropriate for the City Council to authorize the preparation of a Feasibility Report by the engineering staff to further refine the scope, cost, schedule and method of financing these proposed improvements. 33 Agenda Information Memo September 17, 2001 S. CONTRACT 01-14, JULY 2000 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve Change Order No. 1 to Contract 01-14 (July 2000 Storm Mitigation Improvements - Misc. Areas # 1, 4, 5 & 10) and authorize the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • Contract 01-14 provides storm water drainage system mitigation improvements in areas affected by the July 2000 Super Storm, including Areas # 1, 4, 5 and 10 outlined and discussed in the Preliminary Design Report (April 2001). • On April 26, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the consideration of storm mitigation improvements for the Beaver Dam Road and Bear Path Trail area (Project 839). • On June 19, the City Council authorized the preparation of detailed plans and specifications, as well as the acquisition of any necessary easements, for the construction of storm mitigation improvements for Project 839. • On September 4, the City Council awarded Contract 01-14 to Lametti & Sons, Inc. in the amount of $606,127.00. • On September 17, Contract 01-14 was amended to provide for additional work at the cost of $196,245.00, increasing the contract amount to $802,372.00. • Change Order No. 1 adds storm sewer and grading improvements into the contract that were outlined and discussed for the Beaver Dam Road and Bear Path Trail intersection (Project No. 839) in the feasibility report (June 2001). • The cost of the additional work is consistent with bid prices for relevant bid items on other storm mitigation projects within the city. • This change order has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for favorable Council action. • The change order provides for an additional cost of $194,910.00 (24.3% of amended contract). The associated cost will be the responsibility of the City's Storm Sewer Trunk Fund. ATTACHMENTS: • Change Order No. 1, paged:57through3V- `.3 BONESTROO AND ASSOC 6516361311 09/19/01 09:56 [5 :04/06 N0: 489 V.Fji tki/ 4 FJki: 3~ tHt~Mt t NV -UM L&V 3 bNHH N0.365 i Botlestroo Bidder: Total Sam I1li co ff 1qA'5!29tk% P~ Rotene Andedkb Address: Telephone No. 1- --1 p Amdates lv~n ws t ArWons Ci . State Zi : Fat No BND FORM JULY 2000 STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS CITY CONTILACT NO.01.99 PROJECT NO. 839 F1L.E N0, 49400-109 EAGAN, MINNESOTA 2001 Opening Time: Opening Date: 42;a-alpd T,_ ~•3 cn. Honorable City Council - - - Ciry of Sagan 3830 Pilot Knob Rd list-it• Grand fax transmittal memo 7871 ~ottsestes Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1810 7047- W-p m v,:~ f~%%~^Rs Dear Council Members- WW. Pitons G S~ 3 The and reigned, being familiar with your local eonditior necessary, having studied the drawings and specifications for the work including Addenda Nos. and being familiar with all factors and other conditi one affecting the work and cost thereof, hereby proposes to furnish all labor, tools, materials, skills, equipment, and all else necessary to completely conatruot the project in accardanca with the drawings and specifications on Pile with you and Softstroo, Rosene, Anderiik & Associates, Inc., 2333 West Mighway 36, St Paul, Minnesota 55113, as follows: Na Item Units Qty UN)t Prive Total Pries Part 1- Beaver Dam Road I Pond Al -22 t Mobilization LS I S S "S. op pr n 2 Tn!'0c control LS 1 $ 10a t..~ $ 1 ,g= 3 Clearing and grubbing LS 1 S _ 4glz ► S7 ~Z=3~ 4 Transplant Trot EA 5 S . s~ 5 Remove concrete curb and gutter LF 650 S Z L. nn 6 Remove conente driveway pavement SY 25 $ S e94n DIN X4-hQd At-U-05 H•1 I F BONESTR00 AND ASSOC 6516361311 09/19/01 09:56 [5 :05/06 NO:489 W1V1k$/dVW4 Idd:JJ tf•UHN 1J1_-V bWH NU.,•Sb5 LA e No. Item Uotb Qty Unit Price Total Price 1 Remove bituminous paversm SY 11000 S ~ S CM- 0 a Rewave biwnu noun driveway SY 30 3 1cl &4* &a 9 Renwve bituminous path SY 30 S t0 . ~ S 3fl . 10 36" storm lower, 01-8' deep LF 35 S -1 C'aa S -2. S, LC:- 11 36" harm sewer, 8'-1a deep LF is t "1 S : e5 C% S i ,1'L_. t 12 36" atom sewer, 10'-12' deep L,F 73 3 1 S S 4. M RCP flared and section, incl trash EA 2 4n 13 3d S Z :25'd_Q-3 S S~l~-no 14 Clear IA random riprap CY 30 S Is Pond excavation (6V) - Area A CY 5,200 S Cum_ S 1, fig On. [~0 16 Pond excavation (M - Arta B CY 3,800 S Q, Sa S ~3 D-CA00 17 pond excavation (EV) - Area C CY 1.000 S CA S S ton IS Common excavation (EV) CY SSO 3 %0 -Ol~ S 19 Subgrade preparation SY 160 S z oo S S00- C=1 20 Aggregate b se, Clans 5,100% crwhod TN 465 S \ Qr. Q~ S 62, n lM a 80.00 21 9alvsgvd agg+egate (CV) CY 140 S oio S jj 22 Aggregate bale, ClM 5,100% erusbad - TK 1S S -t U_ Cy s trail 23 9iMnlirow base course. Type 3113 TN 14S S S 01 24 Bituminous wear come, Type 41 A TN 110 S S ko a = Yti 25 2" Type 41A, bit.ddveway pavement SY 50 S r S '"11,1. 26 BinzMrlotw wear eoune, Type 41 A. Pathway '1'id 3 S S 27 Simmimn material for tack coat CIAL 60 S ~..0n s - 2 got C3JJ 28 B61 B concrete curb and gutter 1-F 600 5 1-10, S \1i 0 C30 MS. 29 B612 concrete curb and gutter LF 60 S I-ob- C~ 1 1"20"3- 30 6" concrete driveway pavement SY 25 S t7.-> S t, d`~. t'1D BONESTR00 AND ASSOC 6516361311 09/19/01 09:56 5 :06/06 NO:489 09/184&W4 IOd:.-b tHla(~V tfW UM VhV 4 bNHH rU„J%pJ Wr 'r No. Item Units Qty Unit Prke Total Price 31 Adjust catch basin casting EA 2 S = $ - 32 Sawing Bituminous Pavement LF 170 S _'C\r~'_ S 33 unproved pipe foundation LF 120 $ - e S (vSzk I C% V% 34 Swett Sweeper with pick up broom with operator HR 3 S S~ 35 Water for dust control 1000 GAL 10 $ "&'U Qsz~~ S 7rozi . citz. 36 Structure marker sigh F-A 2 S 31==- 8 --M, t,._,_ 37 SeedinS, w/ MnDOT seed prix 25A mod. AC 01 $3-7- (25B) - Pmlrk Sed=c Meadow 38 Seeding, w/ MnDOT seed mix 38A mod. AC 0.6 Ste. ~a~b _ S OHO . ae~ (35B) - Dry Mixed Height Prairie 8, \'Z ~1(vD0 r 39 Sodding. type lawn SY 4,650 $ 4c-. S 40 Topsoil borrow (LV) CY 680 $ S Total Put 1- Savannah Road (Project No. 822) S sr~ Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 T. PROJECT 840, ROBIN LANE STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 840 (Robin Lane - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 8, 2001. FACTS: • On April 26, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond AP-27, located to the east of Robin Lane. • This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 7 and 8, 2000 Super Storm. • A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into both home modification and pond outlet capacity modifications, and is being presented to the City Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this project. • An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further review and discuss the proposed improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers. 39 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 U. PROJECT 843, BEECHER DRIVE STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 843 (Beecher Drive - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 8, 2001. FACTS: • On April 27, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond AP-40, located to the north of Beecher Drive. • This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 2000 Super Storm. • A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into an emergency overland discharge route, as well as grading improvements, and is being presented to the City Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this project. • An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further review and discuss the proposed improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers. 3~ Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 V. PROJECT 844, FORSSA WAY STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 844 (Forssa Way - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 8, 2001. FACTS: • On April 27, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond AP-47, located in Ridge Cliff Park, adjacent to Forssa Way. • This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 7 and 8, 2000 Super Storm. • A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into the addition of storm sewer improvements, and is being presented to the City Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this project. • An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further review and discuss the proposed improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Feasibility Report, will be included with Administrative Agenda. D i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 W. PROJECT 845. ROCKY LANEIPADDOCK COURT STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the draft feasibility report for Project 845 (Rocky Lane/Paddock Court - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and schedule a public hearing to be held on November 8, 2001. FACTS: • On April 30, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report considering the storm mitigation improvements for the area including Pond BP-29.7, located north of Deerwood Drive in the Sherwood Downs development. • This location was selected for investigation due to significant flooding after the July 2000 Super Storm. • A draft feasibility report has been completed consisting of an investigation into the enlargement of the outlets from Pond BP-29.7 and modification of private property, and is being presented to the City Council for their information and consideration of scheduling a public hearing to formally present and discuss the merits of this project. • An informational neighborhood meeting will be scheduled to review the feasibility report details with the property owners in the adjacent area prior to the Public Hearing to further review and discuss the proposed improvements. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers. Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 X. PROJECT 510, LIFT STATION UPGRADES STORM MITIGATION IMPROVEMENTS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve plans for Contract 01-09A (Lift Station Upgrades - Storm Mitigation Improvements) and authorize the advertisement for a bid opening to be held at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, November 1, 2001. FACTS: • On April 3, 2001, the City Council authorized the preparation of detail plans and specifications for storm mitigation improvements addressing the operation and management of the City's drainage system. • Contract 01-09A provides for the relocation of the electrical control panels at six storm sewer lift stations within the City, as well as the raising of four access hatches (less than 4 feet) and associated grading as presented in the attached feasibility report (Project 810). The installation of new sluice gates for the Holland and Hurley lift stations would also be included. • The plans and specifications have been completed and are being presented to the City Council for their approval and authorization of the advertisement for bids. ATTACHMENTS: • Feasibility Report, attached without page numbers. i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting Y. APPROVE CONTRACT WITH DECISION RESOURCES FOR GOLF COURSE QUESTIONNAIRE & SURVEY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the contract with Decision Resources for the golf course questionnaire & survey. FACTS: • At the September 17, 2001 City Council meeting staff was directed to arrange for a professional/scientific poll regarding the golf course, with input from the Golf Course Exploratory Committee. • Staff contacted Decision Resources, a highly regarded polling firm, and made arrangements for them to provide a proposal to conduct a scientific survey regarding the golf course issue including the directly tangential issues as they understood them to be and as they felt necessary to achieve meaningful results. • As part of the process to bring a proposed agreement and survey questions to the City Council at this meeting, staff requested proposed questions from the members of the Golf Course Exploratory Committee to be collected at their meeting on September 26, 2001. • At the Golf Course Exploratory Committee meeting the consensus of those in attendance was that a poll at this time is premature. They wanted to thank the City Council for the consideration and suggested that a poll now would not be timely, recommended that a price for a poll be solicited with the actual polling to be deferred to a later date. They further requested that the poll be controlled/directed by the Exploratory Committee. • Staff updated Decision Resources in a conference telephone call on Thursday, September 27`h about the potential change to the original direction. Decision Resources does not have a problem in deferring their involvement to a later date. They were willing to share a range of cost estimates indicating that it is probably not possible to do a poll with less than 10 questions due to the requirement for demographic information, etc. A IO-question poll would cost in the range of $4,000. Their original proposal called for 60 questions at a cost of $8,800. Dr. Morris expressed some reservations about trying to address an issue with these 113 complexities and numerous interrelated issues with a 10-question survey. As noted in the first proposal, each question beyond 60 would add $135 to the cost. ATTACHMENTS: • Enclosed on page q,5~ is a copy of the memo to Exploratory Committee members asking for their participation in determining questions for the poll. • Enclosed on pages_ through is a copy of the original proposal as received from Decision Resources. NOTE: Given the request from the Golf Course Exploratory Committee, it may be appropriate to pull this item from the Consent Agenda and consider action to provide revised staff direction. s,- MEMO c _ city of eagan TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE GOLF COURSE EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 SUBJECT: GOLF COURSE POLL At the last regular City Council meeting held on Monday, September 17, direction was given by the Council to contact Decision Resources requesting preparation of a proposal to conduct a community poll on the golf course issue that is currently under study by this Committee. Decision Resources is a highly regarded firm that specializes in polls/surveys for school districts and cities. The purpose for conducting a poll at this time is to receive input from the public regarding a golf course. The City Council feels this information would help the Exploratory Committee as you continue your research, discussion and work on this issue. To assist Decision Resources and the City Council in proceeding with the poll, it would be helpful if each member of the Committee could submit proposed questions to be used to gain meaningful, quantifiable information from the community. This information will further assist the Committee, and ultimately the City Council, in the review of this issue. This action by the City Council is intended to supplement the research and work on the golf course study which the Exploratory Committee is facilitating on behalf of the City Council. Proposed questions received from members of the Committee at the meeting on Wednesday, September 26, will be shared with Decision Resources as they finalize their suggested questions and proposal to the City Council for consideration at the October 2 meeting. Decision Resources will use their professional expertise to finalize the questions and put them in the appropriate form to conduct an unbiased and completely fair survey of a random sample of the community. Your attention and assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. City Administrator TLH/vmd ~ e City of Eagan Survey Research Proposal September, 2001 DECISION RESOURCES, LTD. 3128 Dean Court Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 612-920-2401 612-920-1069 (fax) wdm@inri.net September 23, 2001 Mr. Kenneth Vraa Park and Recreation Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122-1810 Dear Mr. Vraa: Decision Resources, Ltd., is pleased to present this survey research proposal to you for the City of Eagan. Much of this proposal is based upon your discussion with my partner, Diane Traxler. This prospectus is organized in three parts: a discussion of the goals of the research; a potential design and schedule; and, estimated project costs. As you will see, I am certain that DRL can provide the City of Eagan with the information it seeks in both a cost-effective and timely manner. GOALS OF THE RESEARCH: • The survey would assess the attitudes and opinions of residents of the City of Eagan on five separate, but interrelated issues: 1. Evaluation of City Recreational Programs and Services: How informed are residents about the current park and recreation facilities and programs provided by the City? How do they rate them? What facilities and programs, if any, would they newly offer, expand, modify, or terminate? Do they consider park and recreation facilities and services a good value for the property taxes they pay? 1/6 City of Eagan Survey Research Proposal September, 2001 2. General Perceptions of the Quality of Life in the City of Eagan: What do they like most about living in the City? What do they consider to be the most serious issues facing the City? How are residents viewing demographic changes during the past few years? How do parks and recreational facilities add to the quality of life? What facilities and programs are currently utilized by large segments of the community? How do they view their tax investments in park and recreational facilities? 3. Attitudes and Opinions about a Golf Course: What are residential preferences about the need for a golf course? Would residents be inclined to use this type of facility? What types of amenities should be included in the facility? Are there any types of amenities citizens would oppose including? If tax costs are involved, how willing are residents to raise property taxes for the construction of a new golf course? 4. Environmental versus Recreation Land Use: How do residents feel about the amount of open space dedicated to passive recreational pursuits within the City of Eagan? Would they support or oppose the conversion of a passive recreational area to a golf course? How do they view specific sites within the City for that type of facility? 5. Information Processes: How do residents obtain information about city government and its services? In particular, what sources are relied upon for information about parks and recreation issues? DESIGN AND SCHEDULE OF THE RESEARCH. Decision Resources, Ltd., proposes to conduct a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected households in the City of Eagan. A sample of 400 residents would provide results projectable to the entire city adult population within :L 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. The sample is also of sufficient size to permit the district to be divided into a maximum of four categories for more detailed analysis, such as age, mobility, home ownership, location of residence, presence of children, and other demographic characteristics. To insure the integrity of the sample, DRL places the most exacting sampling standards in the industry on our procedures. Before an alternate household is substituted for a designated target, at least twenty tries are made to contact the initial households during a five-day period. The telephone calls take place during various times on weekday evenings and during the weekend. Our interviewers are also instructed to seek convenient appointments with interviewees, cutting our non-contact rate to less than five percent on average. An unbiased selection process is also used to identify the adult member of the household to be interviewed. To validate the completed sample, the latest United States Census updated population characteristics are utilized as a standard of comparison. The questionnaire would be administered by DRL trained and supervised personnel. The computer analysis will be obtained from our in-house C-MENTOR and SPSS statistical analysis VP 1 i City of Eagan Survey Research Proposal September, 2001 systems, insuring both access to the most current analysis programs and confidentiality of the data set. The City of Eagan will be presented with two bound copies of the final report highlighting all the major findings of the study. DRL will also speak to any major differences from and similarities with the past study of the community, when applicable, in addition to other "growth" communities. A volume of all computer generated cross tabulations and other multivariate statistical techniques will also be included. Our typical timeline follows, but can be amended somewhat to meet the unique needs of the city: 1. Planning with City Council Members, City Staff, and/or relevant individuals to establish the topics to be covered in the survey. Based on these topic concepts, DRL would word specific, neutral questions. This activity can be completed by a meeting, telephone and/or fax, depending on client wishes, within two weeks of the initiation of the contract. 2. Structuring of questions and final approval of the survey instrument. These activities to be completed within three weeks of the initiation of the contract. 3. Final determination of the field dates for interviewing. 4. Pre-testing and, if needed, approval of resulting revisions. This activity to be completed by the second day of fieldwork. 5. Completion of all fieldwork within a three-to-four week period. 6. Computer analysis and preparation of written report. All analytical tests and commentary will be available within three weeks after completion of the fieldwork. 7. Delivery of the final written report to the City of Eagan and presentation at a formal or workshop meeting of the results and implications. Afterwards, telephone consultation, as the need arises, will be provided about the study's findings and implications. PROJECT COSTS: The cost of a survey is driven by two factors: sample size and questionnaire length. A study whose parameters are a maximum of 60 question items administered to a 400 household random sample of the City of Eagan would cost $8,800.00. Each additional question unit beyond the initial allotment would be $135.00. As company policy, DRL requires one-half of the cost prior to the commencement of fieldwork; the remainder is due upon delivery of the final written report. Unless otherwise arranged, DRL City of Eagan Survey Research Proposal September, 2001 invoices clients for the initial payment at the time of the initiation of the contract; the remainder is due at the time of the receipt of the final written report. If you require any further information from us, feel free to contact either Diane or me. We look forward to the opportunity to work once again with the City of Eagan, but, in any case, wish you well with this project. Sincerely, William D. Morris, Ph.D. President i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting Z. APPROVE STATUS OF EAGAN CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU (ECVB) AS A SEPARATE 50103) AND APPROVE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve the status of the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau (ECVB) as a separate 501c(3) corporation retroactive to October 1, 2001 and to approve the new Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. FACTS: • Earlier this year, the Eagan Chamber of Commerce and the ECVB indicated to the City of Eagan that they wished to operate as separate entities. This proposal was reviewed by the Chamber of Commerce, the ECVB and the City Council. • The ECVB Board approved the formation of a new separate corporation on April 19, 2001. • In order to have new Federal and State ID numbers, a UC number and 501 c(3) status, the application must be approved by the City of Eagan retroactive to October 1, 2001. • It would be appropriate to approve the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws at this time. In regards to the personnel and accountability sections of the Bylaws, those sections will be reviewed by the City Council at a later date. ATTACHMENT: t Attached on pages J / through SS'is a copy of the proposed Bylaws for the ECVB. so BYLA WS Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau Date: Purpose: The Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau (ECVB) is organized as private, not-for-profit corporation to promote Eagan as a preferred destination and to advance the economic impact of tourism in the Eagan area by attracting visitors, conventions, meetings and events. Section 1 - General Provisions A) Introduction. 1. Whereas, the City of Eagan believes tourist activity and additional visitors to the City and the surrounding area promotes desirable economic activity and enhances employment; 2. Whereas, the City of Eagan has ordained in City Code Section 2.80, the imposition of an occupancy tax pursuant to Minnesota Statues Section 469.190 at the rate of 3% as of November 1, 1993; 3. Where as the City of Eagan desires that 95% of the taxes collected pursuant to this ordinance fund a local convention/tourist bureau for the purpose of marketing and promoting the City as a tourist/convention center (destination); 4. Whereas, the City of Eagan has designated the Eagan CVB (Convention & Visitors Bureau) as the recipient of these funds; 5. Whereas the Council members of the City of Eagan have designated an initial Board of Directors to form the Eagan CVB and establish its Bylaws; 6. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the initial Board of Directors agree as follows: SECTION H Office A) Principal Office. The principal office of the Corporation shall be located within the City of Eagan. SECTION III - Name A) Name Variations. In addition to its corporate name, Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau as registered with the Minnesota Secretary of State, the Bureau may do business under the trade names: "Eagan Visitors Bureau," "Eagan Tourism Bureau," "Eagan CVB;" or other such names as the Board of Directors may from time to time find appropriate and register properly. II. Board of Directors A) General Powers: The affairs of the ECVB and the control of its property and business shall be managed by the ECVB Board of Directors consistent with the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws. The Board is responsible for strategic planning, developing, & monitoring of the Marketing Plan, budget, policy decisions and the annual audit. The Board will take a proactive role in the promotion of the CVB. B) Composition: The ECVB Board of Directors will consist of at least 13 members and not more than 25 members in good standing. The Board shall consist of at least six (6) members from the hotel industry in the City of Eagan (all hotel general managers may elect to participate on the Board as long as theirproperty is in compliance with the City tax code), two (2) appointed by the local taxing authority (City of Eagan), one (1) from the Hospitality industry of the Eagan area, at least one (1) major employer in the Eagan area, one (1) Community-at-large, one (1) NDC Chamber of Commerce appointee and the ECVB Executive Director, No employer shall have more than one (1) representative on the Board. Each Committee member shall name one (1) alternate from the organization they represent to be approved by the Board. This alternate will attend meetings and be allowed to vote in the absence of the Board member. s~ C) Qualification: A member of the Board of Directors in good standing shall support the mission of the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau and adhere to the City of Eagan Tax Code. Anv member of the ECVB Board of Directors who shall be absent from three consecutive regular meetings of the ECVB Board within a twelve month period shall be automatically dropped from the Board unless such absence is approved by a majority vote of those voting at a regular meeting. D) Term of Office: The regular tern of office of the ECVB Board of Directors shall commence on January 1" of the year in which elected and shall run for a period of two (2) years thereafter unless a member of the ECVB Board is elected to fill an un-expired term in which case said advisor shall be elected for the duration of the term. When a member of the ECVB Board requests a sabbatical, that position will be filled with a "like" member for the duration of the sabbatical. The position will revert back to the member taking the sabbatical to complete their term. A member shall serve no more than two consecutive two-year terms with the exception of the hotel industry Board Members, NDC Chamber appointee and two City appointed members. E) Meetings: Regular meetings of the ECVB Board of Directors shall be held bi-monthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November) at such place and hour as the ECVB Board may by resolution determine. The Annual Meeting will be held in January to begin the fiscal year. F) Special Meetings: Special meetings of the ECVB Board may be called by or at the request of the Chair or the Executive Director. G) Notice: Notice of any special meeting of the ECVB Board shall be given at least two days previously thereto by written notice delivered personally, sent by FAX, email, or sent by mail. H) Vacancies: Any Director may resign at any time by giving notice to the Chair or ECVB Director. Such resignation shall take effect at the date of-receipt of such notice or at any later time specified in the resignation. All vacancies on the Board caused by death; resignation or removal may be filled for the un-expired portion of the term by action of the Executive Committee. I) Quorum: One third of the members shall constitute a quorum. In transacting business, a majority vote of those attending is sufficient to adopt or carry any motion except those items requiring a 2/3rds vote in Robert's Rules of Order or this document. SECTION III. Selection of Officers and Board Members: A) Nomination of Officers: A Nominating Committee of three (3) people shall be named by the Chairperson at the November meeting of the ECVB Board meeting. The ECVB Nominating Committee will select a slate of officers from the ECVB Board to the Executive Committee for the forthcoming year. B) Election of Officers: At the January meeting the ECVB Board of Directors shall elect a Chairperson (every other year), Vice Chairperson and 2"d Vice-Chairperson (yearly). One of the three officers on the Executive Committee shall be a hotel representative. C) Election of Board Members: The Nominating Committee shall also submit names of future Board members in good standing for consideration by the Board as current terms expire. D) Duties of Officers: 1) The Chairperson shall be the legislative head of the Eagan Convention and Visitors Bureau, shall serve'a two (2) year term and shall preside at all meetings of the ECVB Board of Directors. With the approval of the ECVB Board, that person shall sign, with the Executive Director, contracts and other instruments affecting the operation of the ECVB and its property. The Chair shall, with the Executive Director, sign all formal documents of the ECVB, and in general, shall 2 S~ perform all duties incident to the office of the Chairperson or such other duties as may be from time to time prescribed by the ECVB Board of Directors. 2) The Vice-Chair shall serve a one (1) year term as assistant to the Chair, performing the duties of Chairperson in the Chairs absence. The Vice-Chair will automatically assume the Chair position following the two-year term of the Chair. 3) The 2" Vice-Chairperson shall serve a one (1) year term and represents the third member of the Executive Committee, performing those duties prescribed by the ECVB Board of Directors. 4) The Executive Director shall perform such responsibilities as may be assigned by the ECVB Board of Directors. S/he shall serve as secretary to the ECVB Board and prepare notices and keep minutes. S/he will also serve as secretary to all committees and/or task forces. With the assistance of the ECVB Executive Committee, the Executive Director shall be responsible for the preparation of an operating budget and marketing plan covering all activities of the ECVB, subject to approval by the ECVB Board of Directors. The Executive Director shall be responsible for all operating expenditures in accordance with the approved budget allocation. 5) Term and Starting Date: The term of office for all elected officers of the Convention and Visitors Bureau shall be for the fast regular meeting in January until the following December, or until their successors have been duly qualified and elected. SECTION IV. Executive Committee: A) Composition: The three members of the Executive Committee shall, by virtue of their responsibility, include: 1. The Chair of the Board of Directors 2. Vice-Chair 3.2 n1 Vice-Chair The Chairperson shall preside. B) General Responsibility: The ECVB Executive Committee shall possess and exercise only emergency powers of the ECVB Board It shall report its action or discussion at the next meeting of the ECVB Board for its approval or rejection of the action taken. C) Meetings: Notice of any meeting of the ECVB Executive Committee shall be given at least 24 hours previous thereto by written notice delivered personally or sent by mail to each member of the ECVB Executive Committee at the address shown by records of the ECVB. SECTION V. Committees and/or Task Forces: The ECVB Board of Directors shall appoint standing committees and/or task forces as needed to carry out the annual program of work. SECTION VI. Policy: The ECVB Board of Directors is responsible for establishing procedure and formulating policy of the organization. It is also responsible for adopting all policies of the organization. SECTION X. Bonding: At the Bureau's expense, the necessary Bonding and Liability Insurance shall be purchased for the benefit of the Bureau, Directors and employees as their interest may appear. SECTION XI. Indemnification: The Bureau shall have the power to indemnify any person to the full extent permitted by law. To the full extent permitted by Minnesota Statues, as amended from time to time, or by other provision of law, each person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or contemplated action, suit or proceeding, wherever brought, whether civil, criminal, administration or investigative, by reason of the fact that s/he is or was a Director or Officer of the Bureau, or s/he is or was serving at the specific request of the Board of Directors of the Bureau, as a director, Officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprises, shall be indemnified by the Bureau against expenses, including attorneys' fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually or reasonably incurred by her or him in connection with such action, suit or proceeding, provided, however, that the indemnification with respect to a person who is or was serving as a Director, Officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise shall apply only the extent such person is not indemnified by such other corporation, 3 partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise. The indemnification provided in this section shall continue as to a person or agent and shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such person and shall apply whether or not the claim against such person arises out of matters occurring before the adoption of this Sub-Section. SECTION )II. Limitation on Director Liability. To the full extent of the Minnesota Corporation law, as it exists on the date hereof or may hereafter be amended, permits the limitation of elimination of the liability of Directors, a Director of the Bureau shall not be liable to the Bureau for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a Director. Any amendment to or repeal of this Sub-Section shall not adversely affect any right or protection of a Director of the Bureau for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such Director occurring prior to such amendment or repeal. SECTION VII. Finances: A) All money received shall be placed in an operating fund of the ECVB and shall be specifically designated for the operation and activities of the ECVB. The ECVB Executive Director shall approve, in advance, all budgeted expenditures paid for the benefit of the ECVB. The Executive Director of the ECVB, with approval of the Chair of the ECVB Board may spend up to $1,000.00 of a non-budgeted or non-allocated expense. No non-budgeted obligations or expenses over $1,000.00 shall be incurred and no money appropriated without prior approval of the ECVB Board of Directors. Funding of the ECVB shall primarily be from revenues raised by the City of Eagan Lodging Tax, memberships and advertising sales. Those properties not complying with the City Tax Code shall have all privileges accorded by the Eagan Convention & Visitors Bureau revoked including, but not limited to, advertising, promotion, Board representation, co-op funds, leads and trade show participation. When delinquent taxes are current, that property will be reinstated and may elect to reprint any materials produced by the ECVB at their expense in order to add their property to the marketing. The Bureau is a Nonprofit Corporation (Chapter 317A Minnesota Statutes) and the issuance of shares is not required. The Bureau may not distribute profits or surpluses. The annual budget must be approved by the ECVB Board of Directors and then presented to Eagan City Council along with the annual report and the next year's program of work. The fiscal year shall begin January and end December, 31. B) Salaries and Compensation: ECVB Board members shall receive no salary or other compensation for their services, but may, upon approval of the ECVB Board of Directors, be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the services performed for the ECVB Board. C) Operating Reserve: A six-month operating reserve shall be set aside in an interest-bearing account. The reserve shall accrue to approximately $90,000.00 to serve as the ECVB financial operating reserve. SECTION VIII. Annual Report: The E_ CVB shall distribute an Annual Report during the 1st quarter of each fiscal year. SECTION IX. Amendments: These policies and procedures may be amended or altered by a two-thirds vote of the ECVB Board of Directors. Notice for such a vote must be received by all ECVB Board members at least ten days in advance of the meeting at which they are acted upon. SECTION X. Parliamentary Procedure: the most recent edition of "Roberts Rules of Order" shall govern the proceedings of the ECVB. SECTION XI. Personnel: A personnel management committee consisting of the Chair, Vice-Chair and 2na Vice-Chair of the ECVB Board of Directors is responsible for the selection, hiring, performance review and compensation of the ECVB Executive Director. A) Executive Director: All employees of the ECVB shall report directly to the Executive Director. S/He shall be responsible for employment, direction, supervision and compensation of all salaried personnel of the ECVB. 4 Sf SECTION XH. ECVB Membership: The ECVB shall recruit members in the hospitality industry who will pay a yearly membership fee in order to utilize ECVB services. The services include, but are not limited to, business listings in ECVB brochures, Internet listings, special rates for coupons, sales leads and direct referrals by the ECVB. Chair - Eagan CVB Board Executive Director- Eagan CVB City Administrator - City of Eagan 5 SS i c Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting AA. PROCLAIM OCTOBER AS TOASTMASTERS MONTH ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To adopt a Proclamation proclaiming October, 2001 as Toastmasters Month. FACTS: • Toastmasters International is the world's leading organization devoted to communication, public speaking and leadership skills. • The ability to communicate clearly is a vital skill that can overcome barriers to effective performance. • There are more than 175,000 members in 63 countries, over 200 clubs with 4000+ members in Minnesota and 7 different clubs in the City of Eagan. ATTACHMENTS: Enclosed on page is a copy of the Toastmasters Month Proclamation. CITY OF EAGAN TOASTMASTERS MONTH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Toastmasters International is the world's leading organization devoted to communication, public speaking and leadership skills; and WHEREAS, the ability to communicate clearly is a vital skill that can overcome barriers to effective performance; and WHEREAS, there are more than 175,000 members in 63 countries, over 200 clubs with 4000+ members in Minnesota and 7 different clubs in the City of Eagan; and WHEREAS, Toastmasters in Minnesota businesses, schools, communities and organizations are dedicated to helping people from all walks of life improve their communication and leadership skills, NOW THEREFORE, I Patricia E. Awada, Mayor of the City of Eagan, on behalf of the City Council, do hereby proclaim the month of October, 2001 as TOASTMASTERS MONTH in Eagan, Minnesota. In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand this 2°d day of October, the year of two thousand and one. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: Its Mayor Attest: Its Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Dated: CERTIFICATION I, Maria Karels, City Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing proclamation was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 2 day of October, 2000. Maria Karels, City Clerk S7 ~ r Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting BB. APPROVE SUBGRANTEE AGREEMENT WITH DAKOTA COUNTY CDA - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To approve a Subgrantee Agreement with the Dakota County CDA for the administration of CDBG funds designated by the City Council for Fiscal Year 2001. FACTS: ➢ The Subgrantee Agreement stipulates the CDA's role in administering the CDBG program funding on behalf of the City. The program funding distribution was defined by the City Council early this year. ISSUES: None ATTACHMENTS: None S8' Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting CC. ADOPT RESOLUTION/ORDER TO INITIATE ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW FOR BCBS EAST CAMPUS - CITY OF EAGAN ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ Adopt Resolution/Order to Initiate Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for Blue Cross/Blue Shield East Campus. FACTS: ➢ The BCBS East campus master development plan was preliminarily reviewed by the City Council earlier this year. Direction was given for BCBS to proceed with the necessary environmental reviews and then to return to the City Council for review and action of the Preliminary Planned Development. ATTACHMENTS: (1) Resolution to order preparation of AUAR document, page 46athrough -.4KZ. I RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF EAGAN ORDER AUAR - BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD EAST CAMPUS WHEREAS, there exists a site of approximately 157 acres in the west-central portion of Eagan, bounded on the north by Yankee Doodle Road, on the west by Trunk Highway (TH) 13, on the south by Blackhawk and Ashbury Roads, and on the east by the City's public works facility, that is commonly referred to as the Blue Cross/Blue Shield East Campus; and WHEREAS, Blue Cross/Blue Shield is seeking Planned Development Approval for expansion of its corporate office facilities, residential development, and associated infrastructure improvements associated with the development of the East Campus; and WHEREAS, it is prudent to conduct an environmental review of the proposed development as provided for in the State of Minnesota Environmental Review Program rules; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 provides for a substitute form of environmental review known as an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process; and WHEREAS, an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) process allows for the environmental review of development and associated infrastructure in a particular geographic area within a jurisdiction if the local government has an adopted comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan has designated the East Campus property as "Special Area" in its Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of Eagan is the Responsible Governmental Unit ("RGU") pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.3610 Subp. 1; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Eagan, that • an AUAR be completed for the Blue Cross/Blue Shield East Campus. CITY OF EAGAN CITY COUNCIL By: It's Mayor 60 Attest: It's Deputy Clerk Motion by: Seconded by: Those in Favor: Those Against: Date: October 2, 2001 CERTIFICATION I, Mira McGarvey, Deputy Clerk of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota in a regular meeting thereof assembled this 2°d day of October, 2001. Mira McGarvey, Deputy Clerk Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting DD. APPROVE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LEASE AGREEMENT ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Approve the telecommunication lease agreement withVerizon, Inc. for an antenna installation on the Southern Lakes Reservoir at 10656 Alton Court, IGH and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • The City has received an application from Verizon, Inc. for the installation of wireless communications system antennas and ground support equipment on the Southern Lakes Water Reservoir. • This application has been reviewed by the City's radio communication consultant, City Attorney's office and Public Works Department personnel and found to be consistent with other past lease agreements and in order for favorable Council consideration. • The current Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Inver Grove Heights allows the City of Eagan to lease space on this tower for telecommunications equipment. V i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 PUBLIC HEARING A. SUN CLIFF 1St ADDITION (LOT 13, BLOCK 1) EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and deny the vacation request of a portion of a public drainage and utility easement on Lot 13, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1St Addition. FACTS: • On August 20, 2001, City staff received a letter from Raj and Kavita Khanchandani, requesting the vacation of a portion of the existing drainage and utility easement on Lot 13, Block 1, Sun Cliff 1St Addition (4277 Sunrise Road). • The easement was originally dedicated to the City as part of the Sun Cliff 1St Addition for drainage and utility purposes. The street-side easement is a standard plat dedication to accommodate site drainage and possible future utility uses. • The purpose of the request is to allow Mr. and Mrs. Khanchandani to construct a four-season porch on an existing deck on Lot 13. The configuration of the proposed porch would encroach further into the existing drainage and utility easement than the existing deck which already encroaches by I foot. • The existing deck appears to have been constructed without a building permit. • The request would vacate a 3' wide portion of the existing easement needed to construct the proposed four-season porch. • All notices have been published in the legal newspaper and sent to all potentially affected private utility owners informing them of this public hearing. Dakota Electric Association has objected to the request to date. • Dakota Electric Association is not in support of approving this vacation due to the existing use of the easement. An electrical line currently occupies the ten-foot wide drainage and utility easement. The proposed addition would be within 2 feet of the existing electrical line. • This vacation request has been reviewed by the Engineering Division and found to be in order for denial by the City Council. City engineering staff is not supportive of the encroachment on the easement adjacent to a public right-of-way that is also in conflict with an existing utility line. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page • Proposed Easement Vacation, page • Request Letter from Resident, page • Dakota Electric Correspondence, page ,.3 1 1 ' ~D a Q a 9-19-01 Q ~ or "to s, I ~qp O~ proposed Vacation o O D C DIFFLEY ROAD fl aD ~ now orsur g G W N Cr 1 Cr U m a U Y Q o J 444 a s CUFF RD. a~ now (M nn a > nn .ow g u ~ [ ~ o Day aQ~ o~ a o ~ A U - sooo ~ Proposed Ease Vacation Location Map Sun Cliff 1st Addition 9-19-01 City of Eagan Lot 13, Block 1 NopkTH s~\ # 3 i AREA TO BE VAVCATED J Iro, ; The Northeasterly 3.0 feet of the Southwesterly 10 feet and Northwesterly 23.0 feet of the Southeasterly 62.17 feet of Lot 13, Block 1, Sim Cliff First Addition. i s RECEIVED AU G 2 0 2001 To EAGAN City of Eagan ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT I request the easement Vacation The North East 3.0 feet of the South West 10 feet and North West 23.0 feet of the South East 62.17 feet of lot 13,Block 1 Sun Cliff First addition. We want to build 4 season porch on our existing deck . Though there is no Gas or Electric lines running under this area The electric line is 2 feet away. As for electric line diging concern 4 feet(2 feet on each side) is more than enough for residential house. We will not damage any electric line . Thanks Sincerelv Raj and Kavita Khanchandani e4 6 LO d LL99 999 LS9 !upueyouey->j rea VUd bi, £ L00Z: LL 3sn6ny Aepijd Russ Matthys From: Knudsen, Craig [CKnudsen@dakotaelectric.com] Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 2:33 PM To: Russ Matthys (E-mail) Subject: Sun Cliff 1st Addition-Proposed Vacation of Drainage and Utility Easement Russ: I wanted to send over a quick response to the above-mentioned vacation. I understand that there is a Oct. 2, 2001 public hearing and I suspect that you will be writing the agenda item for this vacation before I have a chance to get our response back to you. Dakota Electric Association is not in support of approving this vacation due to the existing use of the easement. This is a ten foot drainage and utility easement and we are currently using this easement in serving the public with underground electric energy. Any disruption to this line or access to this line could result in a loss to area residents. Please feel free to contact me at (651) 463-6332 if you have any questions. Thanks, Craig E. Knudsen Land Use Manager Dakota Electric Association g Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting B. VARIANCE -RAJ KHANCHANDANI (4277 SUNRISE ROAD) ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: • To recommend approval of Variance to allow for a 7-foot setback from a public right-of-way and a Variance to exceed the 20 percent maximum lot coverage requirement by 1.4 percent in a residential district. FACTS: • A Variance of 9 feet from the 30-foot Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way setback was granted to the subject property at the time the existing home was built in 1985. • The subject lot is in a Planned Development and is approximately 9,370 square feet in area. 12,000 square feet is standard for an R-1 single family district • A 14-foot deck exists on the southeast side of the existing dwelling unit. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing deck and replace it with a 14' x 24' living space addition. The addition would project 14 feet into the previously approved 21-foot setback allowance leaving a 7-foot setback from the Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way. • The proposed addition would also add 336 square feet of living space to the existing building, creating a total building coverage of 21.4 percent. • The applicant has stated that the lot size and comer configuration of the subject lot is extremely confining and that converting the existing deck to living space should not be any more obtrusive. ATTACHMENTS: • Staff report, pages through 6~ PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 11, 2001 CASE: 29-VA-23-08-01 APPLICANT: Raj Khanchandani HEARING DATE: October 2, 2001 PROPERTY OWNER: Raj Khanchandani APPLICATION DATE: August 2, 2001 REQUEST: Additional 14' setback Variance to PREPARED BY: Erik Slettedahl public right-of-way and to exceed 20% lot coverage by 1.4% LOCATION: 4277 Sunrise Road Lot 13, Block 1 Suncliff 0 Addition COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: LD Low Density ZONING: PD Planned Development SUMMARY OF REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a 7-foot building setback (30' standard) from a public right-of-way (Timber Wolf Trail) and a Variance of 1.4% from the maximum 20 percent lot coverage allowed in a residential zoning district for Lot 13, Block 1 Sun Cliff 1St Addition (PID # 10-72975-130-01) in the NW'/4 of Section 29. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivision 3C states that the Council may grant a variance and impose conditions and safeguards only if. 1. The Council shall determine that the special conditions applying to the structures or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located, and that the granting of the application is necessary for the applicant. 2. The granting of the proposed variance will not be contrary to the intent of this Chapter and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. 3. That granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. Planning Report-Khanchandani Variance September 12, 2001 Page 2 CODE REQUIREMENTS The approved Sun Cliff preliminary plat agreement requires that an application for Variance be submitted for setback purposes for lots and internal streets that do not meet the requirements established in the Eagan Hills West Planned Development. The Eagan Hills West Planned Development requires a 30-foot setback from any abutting right-of-way for all developments within its area. All other standard code provisions shall apply unless granted a Variance by the City Council. City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.20, Subdivision 6, F. requires that all buildings shall not cover more that 20 percent of the site area. Uncovered decks are not calculated in total building coverage. BACKGROUNDIHISTORY Sun Cliff 1St Addition received approval January 19, 1983 and is part of the Eagan Hills West Planned Development established in 1979. Sun Cliff lst Addition was platted as part of this Planned Development to allow for single family detached dwelling units on lot sizes smaller than allowed by City Code Standards. On June 5, 1984 the City Council approved Variances for several corner lots in Sun Cliff 1St Addition to allow for twenty foot setbacks from public rights-of-way. A building permit was approved for the subject property in 1985 for a single family detached dwelling unit. It is assumed that the subject lot was included in the Variance approval as there is no documentation on file indicating what lots were involved, except for a certificate of survey with the building permit application. This certificate notes an approved 21-foot setback along Timber Wolf Trail. According to the applicant, the existing deck located on the southeast side of the subject home was constructed at the same time as the principle structure. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject lot is approximately 9,370 square feet in area and contains an existing home covering 1,671 square feet including attached garage, creating a 17.8 percent building lot coverage. The existing living space is setback 21 feet on the southeast side of the dwelling unit from the Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way. Timber Wolf Trail is a 50 foot right-of-way. A 14-foot deck exists on the southeast side of the dwelling unit. The footings of the deck appear to be setback approximately 10 feet from the Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way. The subject lot has a grade change on the southeast side of approximately 6-7 feet. A retaining wall with established landscaping exists along the south portion of the lot. Several established trees existing between the subject property and the neighboring property to the northwest. Two relatively small cottonwood trees are located adjacent to the existing deck. 6 Planning Report-Khanchandani Variance September 12, 2001 Page 3 The property immediately northwest of the subject lot along Timber Wolf Trail is of similar size but the existing dwelling unit is set sideways on the lot and back 30 feet from the Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way. EVALUATION OF REQUEST The applicant is proposing to remove the existing deck on the southwest side of the house and replace it with a 14' x 24' living space addition. The addition would project 14 feet into the previously approved 21-foot setback allowance leaving a 7-foot setback from the Timber Wolf Trail right-of-way. Also, the proposed addition would add 336 square feet to the existing building coverage, creating a lot coverage of 21.4 percent. The applicant has submitted basic elevation drawings of the proposed addition showing siding, soffits, fascia, and roofing to match the existing home. Windows are proposed on all three exposed sides of the structure. A fencing type material is proposed to cover the sub-floor exterior to grade level. The existing retaining wall on the south corner of the property and established landscaping located on both the south and west sides of the home will assist in screening the proposed addition thus minimizing its impact from Sunrise Road and the neighboring property to the northwest. According to the applicant, one of the existing cottonwood trees would be removed to construct the addition. APPLICANT'S ESTIMATE OF HARDSHIP The applicant has stated that their large family and day care in their home necessitates an expansion of living space. According to the applicant, attempts were made to design the expansion to the rear of the home but these failed, as a logical interior plan could not be devised. The applicant beliefs that the lot size and corner configuration of the subject lot is extremely confining. He has stated that the existing deck has not presented a problem with aesthetics or open space and that converting it to living space should not be any more obtrusive. SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The applicant desires an expansion of the existing home to accommodate family needs and is proposing to construct a 336 square foot living space addition along the southeast side of the existing home adjacent to the Tiber Wolf Trail right-of-way. The proposed addition would require City Council approval of an additional 14-foot Variance to setback requirements from public rights-of-way and a Variance to exceed the 20 percent maximum lot coverage requirement by 1.4 percent. O ~ r Planning Report-Khanchandani Variance September 12, 2001 Page 4 ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval of Variance to allow for a 7-foot setback from a public right-of-way and a Variance to exceed the 20 percent maximum lot coverage requirement by 1.4 percent in a residential district. 1. If within one year after approval, the variance shall not have been completed or utilized, it shall become null and void unless a petition for extension has been granted by the council. Such extension shall be requested in writing at least 30 days before expiration and shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to complete or utilize the use permitted in the variance. 2. The expansion exterior shall match the existing home. 3. Landscaping removed to accommodate the building expansion shall be replaced. I Eagan Boundary Street Area ine Location Map Parcel Area Building Footprint ® ~ a ed, m , a w ® 6 no e M 'p a& A 4A @ n era. u. uw }b 3 e I' MOM' ~ A t ®ES ® IL_ i +I €A e. NF& v ~ ~ ~ ~ q°rM~ G v A ~c .c v, `GFv o Sub"ect Sit ®e q c 1 4 ~ A xM= w. any Ell id / ® ara c r ~ ® ~ ~ 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet Development/Developer. Raj Khanchandani Application: Variance Case No.: 29-VA-23-018-01 Map Prepared using ERSI nrcV'ew 5.1. Parcel bass map data provided N by Dakota County Land Survey Departrnant and is current as of June 2001. THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY W E City of Eagan 64 S ^v r A The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information and are S Gorrrmuraty Dwelopmant Department not responsible for errors or omissions. I T 77, rc ~i .r elfA% YA 1 74 * C ~ S air 3- 8 6 ; ~S'(r ~rr3' ..fi er J l~ T r 4277 Sunrise Road - Southwest and Southeast Elevations f EEL Y ai. 5r. 1 s . ~a s' 4 T, K JAI, *17 zI, ► r~ 4277 Sunrise Road - Southwest and Northwest Elevations 1~3 i peon -astiun-S------------------------ qjnD o 3z; G, .4t ~?i c ~ 2~ X00 ! 40 ?"P.~ a - 9~P °a ! 4m4. O PPP o l a ; i co ~4 ! ''%o a ~®P 5 ~ yu`'v°t x'60 40 4 I noP~% ~ b t''~PP yJf/yOb C P~f. S f / °Y + o i ` Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting PUBLIC HEARINGS C. CONSIDER RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 WITHIN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To give staff direction regarding redevelopment district boundaries, specifically relating to the request of Doris Dahline, 3830 Alder Lane, to be removed from future consideration within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To approve a resolution adopting the redevelopment plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, and establishing Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, and adopting the plans therefor. FACTS (DAHLINE REQUEST): • Ms. Doris Dahline, 3830 Alder Lane, has appeared before the City Council on a number of occasions to state her desire not to be included in the Cedar Grove Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District. • The City has received a letter from the attorney representing Ms. Dahline asking that the City contractually agree to allow Ms. Dahline to remain in her home, without threat of condemnation, for the remainder of her life. • Staff has reviewed the request in terms of its potential impact on the redevelopment effort. A staff memo from Assistant City Administrator Verbrugge outlining possible options for the City Council is attached. • The City has also received correspondence from Ms. Dahline that she asked be included in this packet. FACTS (TIF ADOPTION): • The City of Eagan has been studying the possibility of redevelopment in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area for over two years. • The proposed Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District will give the City the authority to use the mechanism known as tax increment financing to spur development and reinvestment in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. • The Advisory Planning Commission has had an opportunity to review the draft redevelopment plans, as well as the proposed TIF district and TIF plans, and passed a resolution supporting the plans at its meeting on July 24, 2001. • The Eagan Economic Development Authority similarly has reviewed the plans. A resolution of the EDA was passed on August 7, 2001, to approve the plans. • The Public Hearing for this item was originally scheduled for August 21, 2001. At that time, property inspections to determine district eligibility qualification had not been fully completed. The Public Hearing was continued to October 2, 2001. • Property inspections and lot coverage analysis are complete. In order to qualify a redevelopment district, more than 50% of the buildings must be determined to be "substandard" according to statutory guidelines. The analysis shows that 60% of buildings within the proposed boundaries meet the substandard criteria. Lot coverage also meets the 70% statutory requirement. • Legal notice of the Public Hearing was published on September 20, 2001. • Sid Inman and Jim Prosser of Ehlers and Associates, the City's project management consultant for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment, will make a brief presentation regarding the proposed Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District. ATTACHMENTS: Q • The resolution is attached on pages Othrough 0 The Redevelopment Plan for the establishment of The Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area is attached on pages _Uthrough/,a. • The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (a redevelopment district) is attached on pages "hrough P5, 9. • SEH Redevelopmen Eli i ility Assessment executive summary report is attached on pages/4through Z4 111k • SEH assessment analysis is attached on page~Athrough 112.9 Ms. Dahline is attached on a esIGO through Letter from attorney representing p g L • Staff memo regarding options for the Dahline property is attached on pages through. • Correspondence from Ms. Dahline is located on pagesl~through L73. CITY OF EAGAN STATE OF MESNESOTA Council member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND ESTABLISHING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.1 WTTBIN THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA; AND ADOPTING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of Eagan, Minnesota (the "City"), as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Board of Commissioners (the "Board") of the Eagan Economic Development Authority (the "EDA") has heretofore established the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area and adopted the Redevelopment Plan therefor. It has been proposed by the EDA and the City that the City adopt the Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area and establish Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 (the "District") therein and adopt the Tax Increment Financing Plan therefor (collectively, the "Plans"); all pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, 469.090 through 469.1081 and 469.174 through 469.179, all inclusive, as amended, (the "Act") all as reflected in the Plans, and presented for the Council's consideration. 1.02. The EDA and City have investigated the facts relating to the Plans and have caused the Plans to be prepared. 1.03. The EDA and City have performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but not limited to, notification of Dakota County and Independent School District No. 191 having taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, notification of the county commissioner representing the area of the District, a review of and written comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as required by law. 1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and submitted to the Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports include data, information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the bases for the other findings and determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the same extent as if set forth in full herein. Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Plans. 2.01. The Council hereby finds that the Plans, are intended and, in the judgment of this Council, the effect of such actions will be, to provide an impetus for development in the public purpose and accomplish certain objectives as specified in the Plans, which are hereby incorporated herein. Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1. 3.01. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a "redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10 (a)(1). 3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan, that the Plans conform to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole; and that the Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the District by private enterprise. 3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each determination in writing, attached hereto as Exhibit A. 3.04. The Eagan Economic Development Authority elects to calculate fiscal disparities for the District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause a, which means the fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from outside the District. Section 4. Public Purpose 4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act and will help fulfill a need to redevelop an area of the City which is already built up, and help correct conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, including, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of the land, the removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to development of the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans. 5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified, established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and contracts necessary for this purpose. 5.03 The Auditor of is requested to certify the original net tax capacity of the District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the Eagan Economic Development Authority is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of all properties within the District, for which building permits have been 9l~ 1 1 issued during the 18 months immediately preceding the adoption of this resolution. 5.04. The Assistant City Administrator is further authorized and directed to file a copy of the Plans with the Commissioner of Revenue. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council member , and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof. and the following voted against the same: Dated: October 2, 2001 ATTEST: Mayor Assistant City Administrator (Seal) 9 EXHIBIT A RESOLUTION # The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1, as required pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3 are as follows: 1. Finding that Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1). The District consists of 98 parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for owner occupied and rental housing, retail and commercial development, and transit features. At least 70 percent of the area in the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance (See Appendix F of the TIF Plan). 2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of Tax Increment Financing District No. I permitted by the Plan. The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: This finding is supported by the fact that the redevelopment proposed in this plan meets the City's objectives for redevelopment. Due to the high cost of redevelopment on the parcels currently occupied by substandard buildings, the limited amount of commercial/industrial property for expansion adjacent to the existing project, the incompatible land uses at close proximity, and the cost of financing the proposed improvements, this project is feasible only through assistance, in part, from tax increment financing. The selected developers will be asked for and provide a letter and a proforma as justification that the developer would not have gone forward without tax increment assistance. The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the TIF District permitted by the Plan: The City supported this finding on the grounds that the cost of site and public improvements and utilities add to the total redevelopment cost. Historically, site and public improvements costs in this area have made redevelopment infeasible without tax increment assistance. Therefore, the City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being provided to the development. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. If all development which is proposed to be assisted with tax increment were to occur in the District, the total increase in market value would be up to $175,507,200. The present value of tax increments from the District is estimated to be $15,179,803. It is the Council's finding that no development with a market value of greater than $160,327,397 would occur without tax increment assistance in this district within 25 years. This finding is based upon evidence from general past experience with the high cost of acquisition and public improvements in the general area of the District (see Cashflow in Appendix D of the TIF Plan). D i 3. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole. The Planning Commission reviewed the Plan and found that the Plan conforms to the general development plan of the City. 4. Finding that the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. I will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area by private enterprise. The project to be assisted by the District will result in increased employment in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties, increased tax base of the State and add a high quality development to the City. Through the implementation of the Plan, the EDA or City will increase the availability of safe and decent life-cycle housing in the City. As of August 16, 2001 Draft for City Council Review REDEVELOPMENT PLAN for the establishment of THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA CITY OF EAGAN DAKOTA COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA Public Hearing: August 21, 2001 Adopted: EHLERS Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3060 Centre Point* Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105 A A S S O C I A T E S I N C (651) 697-8500 fax (651) 697-8555 www.ehlers-inc.com ~ r TABLE OF CONTENTS (for reference purposes only) SECTION I REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA 1-1 Subsection 1-1. Definitions 1-1 Subsection 1-2. Statutory Authority 1-2 Subsection 1-3. Statement of Findings and Public Purpose 1-2 Subsection 1-4. Statement of Objectives 1-3 Subsection 1-5. Statement of Public Facilities and Costs to Be Financed 1-4 Subsection 1-6. Funding of Developments and Redevelopments 1-4 Subsection 1-7. Environmental Controls 1-4 Subsection 1-8. Proposed Reuse of Property 1-4 Subsection 1-9. Open Space to Be Created 1-5 Subsection 1-10. Administration and Maintenance of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5 Subsection 1-11. Rehabilitation 1-5 Subsection 1-12. Property Acquisition 1-5 Subsection 1-13. Modification of the Redevelopment Plan and/or the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5 Subsection 1-14. Description of Boundaries of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5 APPENDIX A - BOUNDARY MAP OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1 A-1 SECTION I REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Subsection 1-1. Definitions The terms defined below shall, for purposes of this Redevelopment Plan, have the meanings herein specified, unless the context otherwise specifically requires. "City" means the City of Eagan. "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Eagan. "Comprehensive Plan" means the documents which contain the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. "County" means Dakota County, Minnesota. "Enabling Act" means Minnesota Statues, 469.090 through 469.1081 and 469.001 through 469.047, as amended and supplemented from time to time. "Redevelopment Project" means the property within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area, as described in the Redevelopment Plan. "Redevelopment Plan" means this Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area, as initially proposed, and as it shall be modified. "EDA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 through 469.1081, inclusive as amended. "HRA Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 409.001 through 469.047, inclusive as amended. "Land Use Regulations" means all federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, and plans relating to or governing the use of development of land in the City, including but not limited to environmental, zoning and building code laws and regulations. "Project Area" means the real property within the City constituting the Redevelopment Project. "Public Costs" means the costs set forth in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan, and any other costs eligible to be financed by Tax Increments under the TIF Act, EDA Act or the HRA Act. "Public Improvements" means the public improvements described in the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Financing Plan. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment Bonds" means any tax increment bonds or notes issued by the EDA or the City to finance the Public Costs as stated in the Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project and in the Tax Increment Financing Plans, and any obligations issued to refund such bonds. "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 479.174 through 479.179, inclusive, as amended. 1- i City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area i l "Tax Increment Financing District" means any tax increment financing district presently established or to be established in the future in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" or "Plan" means the Plans adopted by the City for any Tax Increment Financing District. Subsection 1-2. Statutory Authority The Enabling Act authorizes the City, upon certain public purpose findings by the City, to establish and designate development and redevelopment projects within the City and to establish, develop and administer redevelopment plans therefore to meet the needs and accomplish the public purposes specified in the Statement of Findings and Public Purpose set forth in Subsection 1-3 below. In accordance with the purposes set forth in the Enabling Act, the City has established the Redevelopment Project comprising the area described on the attached Appendix A and have adopted this Redevelopment Plan therefore. The T1F Act authorizes the City, upon certain findings, establish and designate tax increment financing districts within the Redevelopment Project and to adopt and implement a tax increment financing plan to accomplish the Redevelopment Plan established for the Redevelopment Project. Subsection 1-3. Statement of Findings and Public Purpose The City finds that there is a need for development within the City and Redevelopment Project to provide employment opportunities, to improve the local tax base, and to improve the general economy of the City and State. The sound development of the economic security of the people in the City depends upon proper redevelopment of substandard, blighted, and/or marginal property, as provided in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.002, Subd. 14, and as further defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 469.174, Subd. 10, which includes property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties whose values are too low to pay for the public services required or rendered and properties whose lack of use or improper use has resulted in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health, safety and welfare. The City fords that in many cases, lands in a blighted or substandard area cannot be developed without public participation and assistance in forms including property acquisition and/or write down, proper planning, the financing of land assembly in the work of clearance or development and the making and/or financing of various other public and private improvements and investments necessary for development. In cases where the development of marginal and other property cannot be done by private enterprise alone, the City believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers, to advance and spend public money, and to provide the means and impetus for such development. The City finds that in certain cases property within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area would not or may not be available for the development without the specific financial aid to be sought, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise, and that the Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. The City also finds that the welfare of the City and State requires the active promotion, attraction, encouragement, and development of housing and economically sound industry and commerce through governmental action for the purpose or preventing the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment. It shall also be the policy of the City to facilitate and encourage such action as may be necessary to prevent the economic deterioration of such areas to the point where the process can be reserved only by total redevelopment. Through the use of the powers conferred on the City pursuant to the Enabling Act, promoting economic development and housing may prevent the occurrence of conditions City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-2 g~ requiring redevelopment and prevent the emergence of blight, marginal land, and substantial and persistent unemployment. The City also finds that the welfare of the City requires (1) the development and redevelopment of blighted areas, in situations in which private enterprise would not act without government participation or subsidies (2) removing, preventing, or reducing blight, blighting factors, and the causes of blight, and (3) urban renewal projects to eliminate or prevent the development or spread of slums or blighted or deteriorating areas. Subsection 1-4. Statement of Objectives The establishment of the Redevelopment Project in the City pursuant to the Enabling Act is necessary and in the best interests of the City and its residents and is necessary to give the City the ability to meet certain public purpose objectives that would not be obtainable in the foreseeable future without intervention by the City in the normal development process. The City intends, to the extent permitted by law, to accomplish the following objectives through the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan: 1. Providing and securing the development of increased opportunities for families to reside in quality owner-occupied housing, for senior citizens to choose from housing options which offer a wide array of services without regard to income, and for residents looking for a wide range of multi-family units. 2. Promoting and securing the prompt development of property in the Redevelopment Project in a manner consistent with the City's planning and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, which property is less productive because of the lack of proper utilization and lack of investment, and thereby promoting and securing the development of other land in the City; 3. Promoting and securing additional employment opportunities within the Redevelopment Project and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards and preventing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the City; 4. Securing the increase in value of property subject to taxation by the City, School District, County and any other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them; 5. Securing the construction and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of public improvements in the Redevelopment Project, which are necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Redevelopment Project. 6. Promoting the concentration of new unified development consisting of housing and commercial development in the Redevelopment Project so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City. 7. Encouraging the expansion and improvement of local business, economic activity and development, whenever possible. 8. Creating a desirable and unique character within the Redevelopment Project through quality land use alternatives and design quality in new buildings. City of Eagan. Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-3 I 1 9. To prevent the emergence of, and promote redevelopment of, blighted or marginal property. Subsection 1-5. Statement of Public Facilities and Costs to Be Financed The City will perform or cause to be performed, to the extent permitted by law, all project activities pursuant to the Enabling Act, the TIF Act and other applicable state laws, and in doing so anticipates that the following may, but are not required, to be undertaking by the City: (a) The making of studies, planning, and other formal and informal activities relating to the Redevelopment Plan. (b) The implementation and administration of the Redevelopment Plan. (c) The re-zoning of land within the City. (d) The acquisition of property, or interests in property, by purchase or condemnation, which acquisition is consistent with the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. (e) The preparation of property for use and development in accordance with applicable land use regulations and any development agreements, including demolition of structures, clearance of sites, environmental remediation, land preparation, and construction of necessary public improvements. (f) The resale of property to private parties. (g) The issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance the Public Costs of the Redevelopment Plan, and the use of Tax Increments or other funds available to the the City to pay or finance the Public Costs incurred or to be incurred pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan. (h) The use of Tax Increments to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds or otherwise pay or reimburse with interest the Public Costs. Subsection 1-6. Funding of Developments and Redevelopments It is anticipated that the Public Costs of the Redevelopment Plan will be paid from proceeds of Tax Increment Bonds. The City reserves the right to utilize other available sources of revenue, including but not limited to special assessments and user charges, which the City may apply to pay a portion of the Public Costs. Subsection 1-7. Environmental Controls All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental controls and all applicable land use regulations. Subsection 1-8. Proposed Reuse of Property The Redevelopment Plan contemplates that the City may acquire property and reconvey the same to another entity. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City will require the execution of a binding development agreement with respect thereto and evidence that Tax Increments or other funds will be available to repay the Public Costs associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever possible. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any development agreement to which the City is City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-4 8 a party. Subsection 1-9. Open Space to Be Created Any open space within the Redevelopment Project will be created in accordance with the zoning and land use ordinances of the City. Subsection 1-10. Administration and Maintenance of Redevelopment Project Area No.1 Maintenance and operation of the Redevelopment Project will be the responsibility of the Assistant City Administrator. Each year, the administrator of the Redevelopment Project will submit to the City Council the maintenance and operation budget for the following year. The administrator of the Redevelopment Project will administer the Redevelopment Project pursuant to the provisions of the Enabling Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the City Council. Subsection 1-11. Rehabilitation Owners of properties within the Redevelopment Project may be encouraged to rehabilitate their properties to conform with the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Persons who purchase property within the Redevelopment Project from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties as a condition of sale of land. The City may provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from federal, state or local sources. Subsection 1-12. Property Acquisition The City may acquire such property, or appropriate interest therein, within the Redevelopment Project Area as the City may deem to be necessary or desirable to assist in the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan. Subsection 1-13. Modification of the Redevelopment Plan and/or the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area The City reserves the right to alter and amend the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plans, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The City specifically reserves the right to enlarge or reduce the size of the Project Area and the Tax Increment Financing District, the Redevelopment Plan, the Public Costs and the amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such cost by following the procedures specified in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4. Subsection 1-14. Description of Boundaries of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area The Redevelopment Project will contain the following parcels: See map in Appendix A City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area 1-5 I ➢ APPENDIX A BOUNDARY MAP OF REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 1 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-1 ~~/i fib • 1 . log I CO v V o I-- co CL 0 I0 10 ' cac • Z O V u. .000* LM : 0 ~joe- L '000. m 00000, tIY 000 I p 2D-Jul-01 *Lty of Eagan Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Parcel/Building Information MAP ID: 1 TAXPI : 108808008200 Acres (OW acres of Tax ParoNk 14.0 Property Owner DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Lard Value. $517,400.00 Not Tax: $19,797.16 % RONALD A HAVE Assessed BId9. Value: $0.00 Speelal Assesanerd $0.00 8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $517,400.00 ToW Tax: $19,797.16 BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Lao Bob Dab (nw": 0 0 Be" Value: $0.00 Zon1w: 1.1 Land Use Guide: IND Bldg. Date: YwBuift: Bum"Type: FinlehW BId9. ft ft.: Garage 9% ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 2 TAXPN: 108806002000 Acres (toed sew al Tax Pucal) 1.1 Property Ownw- DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Land Value: $70.000.00 Net Tax: $2.752.40 % RONALD A HAVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assesamort $0.00 8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $70.000.00 Total Tax: $2,752.40 BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Lao Sob Date (W ft 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00 zar": 1.1 Land this GWrle: ND Bldg. Data: YwBult er1ldln9Typs: FMMMW Bldg. ft ft.: Gore" S4 fl:* BEDS: BAM MAP ID: 3 TAXPN: 1088080M001 Acres (IoW acres of Tax ParoMk 1.5 Property Owner PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $78,900.00 Net Tax: $1,209.54 144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $78.900.00 Total Tax: $1,209.54 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Loo Bob Dab (mryr). 0 0 SW Value: $0.00 Zordrg. R4 Lard Lee Gulls: SA Bldg. Data: Yew suet: BuNdrq Type: Fkd& W slap. 94 ft.: Garage ft fl: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 4 TAXPN: 108808008001 Acres (total acres of Tax Paroalk 1.5 Property Owner: PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $106,700.00 Net Tarc $1,869.68 144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 SpecW Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $1011,700.00 Total Tax: $1,889.68 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Lao Sale Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00 Mmft: R-4 Land the Oulds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew BOL BUMV Type: FMdW" slft ft ft.: Garage 5% ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 5 TAXPN: 101980001001 Agee (toW acres of Tax Pwm* 82 Property Oww SILVER BELL BUSINESS CENTER PC Assessed Land Valve: $628.000.00 No Tax: $149,457.06 %ELLIOT J LARSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $3,470.000.00 Special Assessnrnd $12,56528 PO BOX 100 Total Assessed Value: $4,0911,000.00 Total Tax: $162,022.34 WARROAD MN 567630100 Lest Sale Dab (mlyr): 11 1991 ask Value: $1.950.000.00 Zodng: PD Land tie Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bul t: 1985 Burdirg Type: WHSE,BUSCR Me?" Bldg. Sq. fl.: 100.340.0 Geroge ft ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 32 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for dte Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-2 MAP ID: 6 TAXPN: 190190001102 Acres (toW acne of Tax Peed): 4.9 Property Owner. BERNARD J MULCANYCO INC Assessed Land Value: $145,000.00 Net Tax: $3,757.40 2700 BLUE WATER ROAD STE 100 Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $8.203.16 Toed Assessed Value: $145,000.00 Total Tax: $11,960.56 EAGAN MN 55121-1400 Last Sale Dab (mryr): 0 0 Sw Value: $0,00 Zoning: 1.1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew now: Gulkli gType: faMalfed Bldg. Sq. to Garw Sq. R: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 7 TAXPN: 107850001001 Acres (total saes of Tax PwcW 6.0 Property Owner: TESSERACT OF EAGAN INC Assessed Land Value: $789,800.00 NO Tax: $134.311.00 7760 FRANCE AVE S STE 1430 Assessed Bldg. Value: $2,720200.00 Special Assessment $867.34 TOW Assessed Value: $3,490,000.00 Total Tax: $135,178.34 BLOOMINGTON MN 55435 Last Sale Dab (mNT): 0 0 SW Value: $0.00 Zoning: PD Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built- tees BuIldtm9 Type: CLASSROOM Rnialed 8109. Sq. ff.: 35,9W.0 Geage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 10 MAP ID: 8 TAXPIN: 107550001000 Acme (IOW acne of Tax Paroeq 6.1 Property Owner. SILL PROPERTIES Assessed Land Value: $503.800.00 Nat Tax: $17,16414 5633 HWY 13 W Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Toed Assessed Value: $503,800.00 Total Tax: $17,164.14 SAVAGE MN 55378-1215 Last Sale Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00 Zoning: PD Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Built: Bwalng Type: Fh" Bldg. Sq. tt.: Qea9e Sq & BEDS BATH: MAP ID: 9 TAXPN: 100190002025 Acres (total acres of Taft PareaQ: 6.9 Property Owner: R L BERNSTEIN Assessed Led Value: $295,800.00 Net Tae $24,069.06 % WM G SMALL Assessed Bldg. Value: $368,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00 9714 OLD KATY RD TOW Assessed Value: $864,800.00 Toed Tas: 524,069.06 HOUSTON TX 770556209 Last Sob Dab (rngr$ 0 0 saw Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1.1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Vow Bdn: 1963 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finial Bldg. Sq. fL: 22,240.0 Garep Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 10 TAXPN: 100190001025 Acres (toed saes of Tax Paroal): 0.6 Property Owner: SHELDON 8 MARY RAMNARINE Assessed Land Value: $16,000.00 Net Tax: $259.34 37&5 NICOLS RD Assessed BId9. Value. $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $16.000.00 Toed Tau: $259.34 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1016 Last Sale Dab (mryr): 0 0 Sob Value: $o.oo Zoning: 1.1 Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew suit: Buedim9 Type: finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: limps Sq. ft: BEDS BATH: MAP ID: 11 TAXPN: 100100003025 Acres (toed acres of Tax Panplk 7.6 Property Owner CfTY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $153,500.00 NO Tax: $0.00 3795 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Spacial Asaesened $0.00 Toed Assessed Value: $153,500.00 Toed Tax: $0.00 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1318 Lest Sale Dab (rnvyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1.1 Lead Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bniu: BuBdinp Type: Finieled BId9. Sq. fL: Gerap S% ft BEDS BATH: City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plant for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-3 I 1 MAP ID: 15 TAXPN: 101370007001 Acres (total was of Tax Parcel): 0.6 Property Owner: RANDALL J 8 SANDRA K GUAM Assessed Land Value, $82.100.00 NWT*:: =7,14052 3925 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed 8100. Value: $143.900.00 Special Assmearne t $0.00 Total Assessed Value: 1226,000.00 Total Tax: $7,140.52 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1415 Last Sale Deb (W r): 6 1992 Soft Value: 1205,000.00 Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw sure 1977 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finial red Bldg. Sq. It.: 7,090.0 Gmage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 16 TAXPN: 101370006001 Acres (total acres of Tat Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner KELLY 8 CONNIE PLOURDE Assessed Land Value: $60,900.00 NO Tax: $5,672.36 8100 AUTO CLUB RD UNIT 208 Assessed 914 Value: 8127200.00 Special AssesenNnt $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $188,000.00 Told Tjw $5.672.36 BLOOMINGTON had 55438.2488 Lao Sale Dab (Wien). 12 1992 Sale Valve: 888,914.00 Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: OFFICE Fk9sNed Bldg. S% fL: 3,642.0 Greg. Sq. ft: O BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 17 TAXPN: 101370005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Ps, 0.8 Properly Aran JAMAL D ANSARI Assessed Land Value: $103,700.00 Net Tax: $4,852.60 3945 SIBLEY MFM HWY Assessed 9idg. Value: $58.900.00 apeclel Ammm" d $178.84 Total Assessed Value. $162,500.00 Total Tax: $4,831.54 SAINT PAUL MN 65122.1415 Last Sale Data (myr): 0 0 isle Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land I%@ Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw BURL 1976 BWW4* Two: RESTAURANT FhdW d 9Wq. 8q fL- 3,042.0 Gerege $41. k: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 18 TAXPN: 101370004001 Acres (total saes of Tax Parcel: 0.9 Property Owner: SLED HEAD O C CADBA LARSONS AUTOMOTI Assessed Land value: $113,200.00 Net Tax: $4,816.02 3955 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,800.00 Special Assessment $196.99 Total Assessed Value: $165,000.00 Totai Tax: $5,013.00 EAGAN MN 55122.1411 Last Sale Dab (mfyr): 11 1994 aw Value: $178,106.00 Zoning: GB Land Use GWds: SA Bldg. Deft: Vow Bun: 1991 St"ng Type: SERVC GAR flydslled sidw ft fu 2.860.0 0 ge $4 ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 19 TAXPN: 101370003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9 Property Ownei CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $120.100.00 Net Tax: $0.00 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD Assessed Bldg. Value: 80.00 Special AaeaennMtt $0.00 Total Assessed Value: 8120,100.00 Total Tax: $0.00 EAGAN MN 55122-1810 Law Sob Data (mfy"- 0 0 Sole Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land Use GWds: SA Bldg. Date: Ywsuft sWldingType: Flrnbhsd Bldg. a4 fL: Gal 0 $4 ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 20 TAXPN: 101370002001 Acres (total saes of Tax Proal): 0.9 Properly Ownw STRATFORD HOLDINGLLC Assessed Lard Value: 8121,600.00 Not Tau: $8,690.60 %THE LANGFAN CO Assessed Bldg. Value: $140.400.00 Special Aasnment $210.32 6 45TH ST E Total Assessed Value: 1282,000.00 Told Tax: $6,900.92 NEW YORK NY 10017.2414 Last Sale Deb (w0ft 0 0 aid Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land Ua GWde: SA Bldg. Data: Yw sun: 1976 sWlding Type: RETAIL STR Rnhit" Bldg. esq. IL- 4,500.0 Grage 44 ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 City of Fagan Minnesota Redevelopment P for the Cc& Grove Redevelop mi: Project Area A-4 MAP ID: 21 TAXPN: 101370001001 Acres (toed acres of Tau Pmeal): 1.0 Property Owner. SUPERIOR COLLISION 6 PAINT INC Assessed Land Value: $133,000.00 Not Tax: $14,033.42 39115 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg Value: 1274,000.00 Special Assessnnni $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $407,000.00 Total Tat: $14,033.42 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1411 Last Sale Dab (mfyr): 0 0 Sam Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Buln: 1988 BuMdlrp Type: SERVO GAR Rldalald Bldg. 8q. 1L: 14162.0 Garage ft ft:- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 22 _ TAXPN: 100190001003 Acres (tool saes of Tax ParoN): 0.7 Property Owner U-HAUL REAL ESTATE CO Assessed Land Value: $881800.00 Net Tax: $3,504.72 PO BOX 29048 Assessed Bldg. Yalue: $29' 00.00 Special Asse an eM $16220 Total Assessed Value: $118,000.00 Total Tax: $3,666.92 PHOENIX AZ 85038-9046 Last $W Dab (aAft 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land Use Guido: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1965 "ding Type. SERVC GAR Rnished Bldg. Sq. }L: 1,534.0 Gape 84 R 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 25 TAXPN: 101670204108 Acres (tool acres of Tax Peroal): 0.7 Property Owner. JOSEPH L 6 ELISE D STEINFELD Assessed Land Value: $41,800.00 Nal Tax: $4,865.82 %ASK FINANCIAL Assessed Bldg. Value: $127,000.00 Spedal Aaeeesm rd $0.00 4040 NICOLS RD Total Assessed Value: $188,600.00 Toed Tat: $4,865.82 EAGAN MN 55122-1906 test Soft Dab (mlyr): 5 1998 840 Value: $154,000.00 Zoning: LB Land Use Qulde: SA Bldg. Data: YwBugh 1978 BwldlngType: OFFICE Finished Bldg. B¢ !L: 3,912.0 n ge ft It- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 26 TAXPN: 101.10203106 Acres (total sores of Tat Pam@* 0.3 Property Owner. LAWRENCE W 8 DONEENE WENZEI Assessed Land Value: $20.400.00 Net Tax: $330.78 3800 KENNEBEE DR Assessed Bldg Value: $0.00 Special Ass"arnent $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $20,400.00 Total Tax: $330.78 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Leal 609 Dale (rNyrr 0 0 tam Value: $0.00 Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew bate. Building T"m Brushed Bldg Sq. ft-- Q ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 27 TAXPN: 101670202008 Acres (tom scree of Tax Perselg 0.3 Property Owner: LAWRENCE W a DONEENE WENZEL Assessed Land Value: $36,900.00 Net Tax: $564.42 3800 KENNESEE DR Assessed Bldg Value: $0.00 Special Assesarrant $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $36,900.00 Toed Tax: $564.42 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sele Dab (w9p): 0 0 SW Value: $0.00 Zoning; LB Lard Use Guido: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bulls: BuNding Type: Finished Bldg Sq. fL: -Garage B4 R: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 28 TAXPN: 101070201008 Agee (tool saes of Tax Paroal): 0.3 Property Owner. DENNIS D & FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Land Value: $36,900.00 Net Tax: $564.42 50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: 838.900.00 Total Tax: $564.42 MINNEAPOLIS MN 564031145 Last Bale Deb (mryr): 0 0 We Value: $0.00 Zoning: LB Lard Use Gulds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bunk: Building Type: FWShed Bldg. Sq. ft- n 9 Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopmatt Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopnmt Project Area A-5 y 1 p MAP ID: 29 TAXPN: 100190010008 Arne (total acres of Tat Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner. WING K SETO Assessed Land Value: $93.5W= fW Tax: $5272.32 4730 OAK CUFF DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $80,200.00 Special Aseeaenwni $516.60 Total Assessed Value: $173.700.00 Total Tax: $5.788.92 EAGAN MN 55122.3301 Last Sale, Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Sam Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built 1968 area I Type: RESTAURANT Rnm" Bldg. Sq. fL: 2,534.0 Oarage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 30 TAXPN: 101382001000 Acres (total acres of Tax ParcN): 32 Property Oww: DENNIS D & FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Lard Value: $57,800.00 Nei Tax: $1,706.04 50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Asaaesment $820.86 Toth Assessed Valrw: $57,800.00 TOW Tax: $2.526.90 MINNEAPOLIS MN S5403.1145 Last Sale Dam (ar/yr) O 0 Bob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Les Gulds: SA Bldg. Data: YwBuilt wlldingTwo: Finialred Bldg. Sq. 1L: Oraye Sq. ft BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 31 TAXPIN: 101352001001 Acres (toed aria of Tax PsroN): 0.7 Property Owner. TIMOTHY J BEEBE Assessed Land Value: $50.300.00 Not Tax: $1,51024 1671 E OLD SHAKOPEE RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $800.00 Special Asaessnrnt $0.00 Toed Assessed Value: $50,900.00 Toed Tax: $1,51024 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425.2444 Last Bob Dab (ft*y 12 1987 arm Value: $111,750.00 Zoning; CSC Land Use Grrlds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bullt 1930 Building TV": SHEO,EOUIP Rnlalted Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,716.0 Garage 84 It 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 MAP ID: 32 TAXPN: 101352002001 Acres (total arse of Tax Parcel) 0.5 Property Omer: WADE H & DEBRA L YARBROI-GH Assessed Land Value: $37,800.00 Nal Tax: $3,944.50 12916 HAMLET AVE Assessed Bldg. Value. $107200.00 Special Assessment $122.10 Total Assessed Value: $145,000.00 ToW Tax: $4,056.W SAINT PAUL MN $5124-9730 Last SW Dam (mlyr): 2 1988 Sam Value: $180,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bust: 1967 atnllding Type: OFFICE RM~ Bmlg. Sq. ft.: 7,200.0 Gsrsge aq ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 33 TAXPN: 100190002012 Acres (total acres of Tax Paroal): 1.7 Property Owner. GORDON S AUCE KOPACEK Assessed Land Value: $116,600.00 Net Tax: $4,259.88 4000 BEAU D'RL E DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 570,200.00 Special Asseesn»M $398.90 Toed Assessed Value: $186,800.00 Total Tax: $4,658.78 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sam Dab (nifyr) 0 0 Sam value: $0.00 Zmkv: CSC Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bust 1940 SuNdlrlg Type: SHED,EOUIP FAM*d Bldg. Sq. ft- 1.900.0 tiange Sol. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 Bldg. Data: Year Bust 1955 Building Type: SHED,EOIIIP FhW" Bldg. ft lu 2.184.0 awe" 841t 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 Bldg. Data: Yew Built. 1954 BuildingTyps: S.FAM.RES Phgml adg. Sq. ft_ 1,016.0 Garage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 2 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 34 TAXPN: 100190003012 Acres (total sores of Tax Pancel): 1.8 Property 0w.m HANSEN METCALF ENT Assessed Land Value: $122,300.00 Net Tax: $7201.94 3990 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $103,200.00 Special Aeseswmd $417.18 Total Assessed Value: $225,500.00 Toed Tax: $7,619.12 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sam Dab (Myr) 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bust 1958 atnadhq Type: VET HSPTL Finished Sidg. Sq. fL• 4.752.0 Garage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 City Of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Coder Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-6 S MAP ID: 35 TAXPN: 101670201000 Aces (total acres of Tax Psm 4.3 property Owner. LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Vapw: $23.200.00 fist Tax: $357.10 1077 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Valor: 60.00 Special Assessment 6651.34 APT 801 Total Assessed Value: $23200.00 Total Tax: 61,008.44 SAINT PAUL MN 551185612 Last Sale left (nVy* 0 0 Sale Value $0.00 Zoning: R•1 Land Use Qodr: SA Bldg. Data: TwBult 3WdIngTV": Finial red adg.141L: Grsge Sq ft BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 36 TAXPId: 180110001111 Acres (total aces of Tax Paroalr 9.6 Properly Owner LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Vakn: $419.900.00 Net Tax $14,575.72 1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY AFT 106 Assessed Bldg. Value: 648.200.00 Special Assessment 61.882.44 Toed Assessed Valro: $468,100.00 ToW Tax $16,458.16 SAINT PAUL MN 55118.3667 Last SW* Dab (mly* 0 0 SW Value 60.00 Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Vow aa9t 1900 Bull" Type: S.FAM.RES F%90*d BMW fiq.fL: 1,228.0 Garage sq fl: o BEDS: 2 BATH: 1 Bldg. Data: Yew 014111L. 1985 BalldingType: WHSE,STRG FinWW Bldg. Sq. ft- 30,000.0 Qalage Sq. ft* 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 37 TAXPN: 100190004112 Acres (total acres of Tax ParosQ 0.6 Property Owner: JOOS ELECTRIC OO Assessed Wed Value: $37200.00 NM Tax $1,815.34 3980 BEAUDRUE OR Assessed Brig. Valm: $27,000.00 SpmW Assessnwri 60.00 ToW Assessed Valve: $64,200.00 Total Tax $1,815.34 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Deb (mfy* 0 O Sob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC WM Use Grids: SA Bldg. Data: YwBulk: 1980 Building Type: OFFICE Rr Wed Brig. 8% fL: 2012.0 Gres Sq. ft- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 38 TAXPN: 100190004212 Acres (total acres of Tax ParosQ: 1.0 Proprly Owner: JOHN R LACHENMAYER Assessed Lard Value: $80,800.00 Net Tax: $1,015.30 3066 BEAU D RUE OR Assessed Bldg. Valve: $106,400.00 Special Apassment 6180.84 Toed Assessed Value: $109200.00 Toed Tax: $1,196.14 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sale Dab (ntfy* 9 1992 SW Value: $87,500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Quids: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Built 19W BuNding Type: S.FAMLRES Finial Bldg. Sob fl.: 2,049.0 Garage ft ft 0 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 MAP ID: 39 TAXPN: 100190001211 Mass (t*W scree of Tax ParoW.. 1.9 Proprty Owner: LEO M)GOL Assessed Land Value: $103,800.00 Net Tax $4250.18 1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY APT 106 Assessed $Idg. Value: $400.00 Special Aesseresni 6438.44 Total Assessed Vallee: 6104,200.00 Toed Tax: $4,688.62 SAINT PAUL MN 551183667 Last Sob Dab (*OM: 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00 Zoning: A Land Use Quids: SA Bldg. Data: YwBulit 1915 Boding TWO: WHSE.STRG FMished Brig. 8% fta 12,385.0 Garage Sq ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 Bldg. Data: Yw edit 1915 Building Type: WHSE STRG Rnbhad Brig. ft ft: 4.888.0 Garage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 Bldg. Data: Yw Built 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. ft IL: 4.500.0 Geroge Sq. ft. 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 Bldg. Data: VOW Built: 1915 Bolding Type: WHSE.STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 3.616.0 Garage ft ft- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 City of Eagan. Minnesota Redevelopient Plan for the Cedar Gmve Redevelopment Project Area A-7 6 MAP ID: 40 TAXPN. 100190001008 Acres (total acres of Tax Pat 1.6 Property Owner. SINCWR MARKETING INC Assessed Land Value: $169,900.00 ""Tax: $5.966.72 SW E SOUTH TEMPLE Assessed Bldg. Value: $25,100.00 SpwW Aaseeemeni $2,188.74 PO BOX 30825 Total Assessed Value: $195,000.00 Total Tax: $8,155.46 SALT LAKE CITY LIT 84102-1005 Last Sob Dab (mryrj 0 0 aeb Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Buih: 1965 Building Type: SERVO STN Rrd~ Bldg. Sq. R: 1,247.0 Garage ft ft- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 41 TAXPN: 100190009008 Acres (toed acres of Tax Pal OS PropertyOwner JEFFREY SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $58,600.00 Net Tax: $3,698.12 1009 99TH ST Assessed slag. Value: $71,900.00 Special Apesarnem $122.42 Total Assessed Value: $130,500.00 Total Tax: $3,820.54 ROBERTS WI 54023.8405 Last Sob Dab (mfyr): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1968 Boding Type: CARWASH Rnlahed Bldg. S4 ft• 2,562-0 Garage Sq. It- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 MAP ID: 42 TAXPN: 100190002008 Acres (toed acres of Tax Paroeq: 0.3 Proparty Owen: LARRY FRATTALONE Assessed Wed Value: $30,000.00 Net Tax: $3,275.82 3527 LEXINGTON AVE N Assessed Bldg. Value: $85,800.00 Special Aseesamant $78.48 Toed Assessed Value: $115,800.00 Taal Tax: $3,354.30 ARDEN HILLS. MN 55126 Last Sob Dab (nW): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Bunk: 1965 Building Type: RETAIL STR Finished Blft ft fU 5,000.0 Garage ft ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 43 TAXPN: 100190003008 Acres (toed acres of Tax Parosq: 0.4 Pnoparty Owner. GERALD HUSTON Assessed Land Value: $38.000.00 Net Tax: $2.049.66 808 OAKLAND OR Assessed Bldg. Value: $34,700.00 3~ Assessment $99.40 Toed Assessed Value: $72,700.00 Total Talc $2,149.06 BURNSVIL LE MN 553373004 Last Sale Date (agyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SMOD Zoning: CSC Wed Use Guide. SA Bldg. Data: Yw Bust: 1967 Bullom Type: RETNL STR fbd~ Bldg. Sq. ft.: 3,346.0 Garage ft ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 44 TAXPN: 100190007008 Acres (total aces of Tax ParoN): 0.7 PropertyOwen: BTA INV Assessed Land Value: $75,300.00 Net Tax: $7,947.80 %JAMES COOPER Assessed Bidg. Value: $172,000.00 Special Amse msnt $0.00 3989 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $247,300.00 Total Tar. $7,947.80 EAGAN MN 55122.1421 Last Sob Dab (mlyr) 4 1987 Sob Value: $200,ODD.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1970 BuNding Type: SERVC GAR ft" Mdg. ft ft- 8,494.0 Garage esq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 45 TAXPN: 1001900040es Acres (total accts of Tax ParoN): 0.4 Proparty Owner. ROCKY L RANCH Assessed Land Value. $35,800.00 Net Tax: $2,316.74 18901 JORDAN TRL Assessed Bidg. Value: $45,700.00 apedal AssesenMni $0.00 Total Assessed Value: 6111,300.00 Total Tax: $2,316.74 LAK VILLE MN 55044-7776 Wt Sob Dab (nVM: a 1984 SW Value: $67,500.00 Zoning: CSC W W Use Guide. SA Bldg. Data: Year Bunk: 1968 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bidg. Sq. ft_• 1,920.0 Garage esq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 City of Fagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-8 MAP ID: 46 TAXPN: 100190005008 Ames (total ecres ct Tax Para1$ 0.3 Property Owner. JEFFREY D 8 SARAH J SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $24.800.00 Not Tax: 51,915.94 1009 99TH ST Assessed Bldg. Value: $42,300.00 Special Assessrtrnt $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $67,100.00 Told Tax: $1,915.94 ROBERTS WI 54023.8405 Last Bob Dale ptYyr): 12 1989 Sale Value: $60,000.00 Zoning: CSC land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1965 wldingType: LAUNDROMAT FMbhed Bldg. Sq. 1L: 1,520.0 Garage S q- ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 47 TAXPN: 100190008008 Awns (Dotal acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property owner JOSEPH R MILBAUER Assessed Land Value: $4400.00 Net Tax: $5,497.10 3997 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $138.900.00 SpeeW Aessssmer t $0.00 ToW Assessed Value: $183,400.00 Total Tax: $5,497.10 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1421 Last $elo on" (mlyr): 0 0 Sam Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1968 wiling Type: RETAIL STR Finished Bldg. Ba. ft: 4,000.0 Garage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 48 TAXPN: 100190002007 Acres (told acres of Tax Parcel): 0.8 Properly Owner. STEVE J 6 JANE M MARTIN Assessed Land Value: $81200.00 NOT= $8,581.12 920 HARRIET AVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $182,700.00 Special Assessment 5296.62 Told Assessed Value: 1263,900.00 Told Tax: $8.677.74 SAINT PAUL MN 55126.WSI Last Sera Dam (aVyr): 12 1990 Bab value: $275,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Lin Guldle: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1971 molding Type: DAYCARECTR Finished Bldg. Sq. 1t_ 3,480.0 Garsgs Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 49 TAXPIN: 100190001006 Acres (told saes of Tax Parcel0.7 Property Owner. JOHN E 1 KATHLEEN LUNDEEN Assessed Land Value: $57,900.00 Net Tax: $5,905.62 8009 PENNSYLVANIA RD Assessed Bidg. Value: $140,100.00 Spedal AssessmrM $151.46 Total Assessed Value: $196,000.00 Told Tax: $6,057.06 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55438.1134 Last Sob Dam (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land ties Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew wit 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 9,130.0 Garage ft ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH_ 4 MAP ID: 50 TAXPN: 100190001107 Acres (told acres of Tax Parcel): 02 Property Owner JOHN W FITZGERALD Assessed Land Value: $24,100.00 NN Tax: $4,82320 3914 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $149,900.00 Bps" Aaaesamenl $82.66 Told Assessed Value: $174,000.00 Told Tax: $4,905.86 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sole Dam (ab": 12 1994 SW Value: $117,292.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1972 Building Type: OFFICE FWaled Bldg. Sq ft- &5W.0 Garage ft ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 51 TAXPN: 100190005106 Acres (told acres of Tax Parcel): 12.1 Property Owner WAYZATA BAY CTR CO Assessed L&W Value: $1,050,200.00 Net Tax: $103,921.30 PO BOX 834 Assessed Bldg. Value: $1.637,600.00 Spa" Assessment $4,730.22 Told Assessed Value: $2,687,800.00 Told Tax: $108,851.52 NEW UL M MN 580730834 Last Sale Dam (nVyr): 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC LOW Use Oulde: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1965 molding Typo: BHPCTR COM Finished Bldg. S¢ a.: 152,000.0 Garage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 5 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-9 I ( MAP ID: 52 TAXPN: 100190001006 Acres (total acres of Tax Pseal): 3.5 Property Owner: MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed Lard Value: $276,800.00 No Tax: $17,649.38 3900 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 5220.200.00 Special Aaee"ment $1.370.62 Total Assessed Value: $497,000.00 Total Tax: $19.020.00 EAGAN MN 55122-1414 last sale Dab (sees yr): 0 0 Stale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Date: VOW sae: 1963 &"ng Ty": MICE farishad Bldg. Sq. ft.: 13,811.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 4 TAXPN: 100190001106 Acres (toed acres of Tax l1w 3 5 fhaperty OaRer MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed LOW Value: $12,000.00 Net Tax: $48718 3900 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $12,000.00 Total Tax: $487.78 EAGAN MN 55122-1414 Last Sees Dale (rltyf): 0 0 Bale Valve: 50.00 Zaing: CSC Land Use Outds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew 91101L. &"ngType: fiisl»d Bldg. ft IL: aww Bq fL• BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 53 TAXPN: 100190007106 CONDO Acres (total acne of Tax PsreN): Prapelty Orrrer PAUL C BECKER Assessed Land Value: $19200.00 Net Tax: $1,185.74 3012 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg Value: $24.500.00 Speeds Ae umesse t $0.00 Toted Assessed Value: $43,700.00 TOW Tax: $1,185.74 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last 5a» DSM (rrllyr): 2 1997 tuts Valve: $36,000.00 Zoning: CSC LsW Use Oulds: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Bulk 1969 Bu9ding Type: OFFICE Finds! d Bldg ft fL: 900.0 Garage ft ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 TAXPN: 100190007206 CONDO Acres (toW am of Tax Parcel): Property Ayer: PAUL BECKER Assessed Lads Value: $23200.00 Net Tax: $1,408.38 3908 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg Value: $28.700.00 Spa" Assawserd $39.24 Total Assessed Value: $51,900.00 Total Tax: $1,447.82 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1414 Last Sale Data (nVyr): 12 1968 tAle Yokes: $82,500.00 Zoning: CSC L&W Use tilde: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Nmilt 1969 Welding Type: OFC,MD/DTL RnW" eidg ft fl: 1.000.0 Osage Sq ft- 0 BEDS: O BATH: / TAXPN: IOM90007$06 OONDO Acres (IoW crams of Tax less os1): Property Owner LAWRENCE D & LESLIE HAUOEN Assessed Land Value: $14,400.00 Not Tax: $914.66 4098 HALITE LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $19,300.00 Spada Aseessnert $3924 Total Assessed Value: $331700.00 Toed Tax: $953.90 EAGAN MN 55122-2914 Last SW Dale (nVyr): 0 0 left Value. $0.00 Zoning: CSC Lard Use Odds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew su11t: 1969 wilding Type OFFICE MM Bldg ft ff.: 670.0 Garage ft ft. 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 TAXPN: 100190007406 CONDO Aegis (taMl craw of Tars Pareel): ftopwty Owner. ALAN PAYMAR Assessed Land Valve: $23,200.00 No Tax: $1,625.10 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg value: $36.700.00 Special Assesensenl $39.24 TOW Assessed Valve: $59,900.00 TOW Tax: $1,664.34 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1414 Last Sale Data (ndyr): 0 0 gob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC LW W Use (Aids: SA Bldg. Data: Vow edit: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE RM~ slag Sq. f4 1,246.0 Garage ft ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 54 TAXPN: 1016=12201 Acres (total saes of Tax ParoN): 0.1 Property Owner AMERICAN ACCOUNTS& ADVISORS INC Assessed Lard Valise: $12,300.00 NM Tax: SZ758.82 3904 CEDARVALE OR Assessed Bldg Valve: $72.700.00 Bps" Asesernsnt $0.00 TOW Assessed Value: $85.000.00 Total Tax: $2,758.82 EAGAN MN 55122.1410 last Sale Data (nWyr): 0 0 SaN Valve: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Oulds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built. 1976 suuding Type: OFFICE PNtalled Bldg Sq. fL: 2,400.0 Gasps $q. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-10 C19 MAP ID: 55 TAXPN: 101885012301 Aass (total aces of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Properly Owner AMERICAN ACCOUNTSB ADVISORS INC Assessed Lard Value: $15,100.00 Nat Tax: $3,044.68 3904 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $92,400.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $107,500.00 Tool Tax: $3,044.68 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1410 Last $404 Dab (rniyr): 9 1995 SW Value: $99,500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use OaWs: SA Bldg. Data: Yew BuOt 1978 Building Type: OFFICE Flnisfed Bldg. Sq. ft.; 3.168.0 Garage Sq.11: 0 BEDS: O BATH: 2 MAP ID: 56 TAXPN: 101185003101 Aces (total saes of Tax ParoN): 02 Property Owner MARK S TSTE PARLANTO Assessed Led Value: $22,600.00 Net Tax: $4,277.10 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $128,400.00 Special Aswanerd $50.62 3014 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $151,000.00 Total Tax: $4,327.92 EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Lae Serb Deft Wry 0 0 Sale value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use arde: SA Bldg. Data: Yew BuBt 1974 auk" Type: OFFICE Finished Btdg. Sq. fL- 6,336.0 0 - e Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 57 TAXPN: 101186009001 Acm (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Property Owner. MARSHA H ELUNGSON Assessed Land Value: $8,700.00 NM Tax: $258.54 3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aseewent $19.66 Total Assessed Value: $8,700.00 Too Tax: $27820 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sob Data (n gr 0 0 Soft Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Led Use 0ulds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bunk: Building Type: Finial ed Bldg. $q. It.- Garage $q. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 58 TAXPN: 101685008101 Aces (too saes of Tax Paroal): 0.1 Property Owner MARSHA H EWNGSON Assessed L W Value: $12,000.00 NM Tax: $2.225.18 3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: WOW= $PWW Assessment $27.10 Total Assessed Value: $78,000.00 TOW Tax: 82,25228 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale DM (OryrI 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Oulde: SA Bldg. Data: YwBuilt 1976 Building Type: OFFICE Finial yd Bldg. $q. fL: 2,432-0 Q gs Sq. fL, 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 59 TAXPl1: 101686009= Acres (total saes of Tax Parcel): 0.0 Property Owner. MARSHA H ELUNGSON Assessed Land Value: $4.300.00 Not Tax: $127.46 3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessnent $9.82 Total Assessed Value: $4,300.00 Total Tax: $13728 EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last SW Daft (rrllyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Lard ties 0ulds: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Buft. Building TV": Finished Bldg. Sq. IL: Garage $q. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 60 TAXPN: 101685004001 Acres (total seas of Tax Paroef): 0.1 - Property Owner MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Mahn: $6,300.00 Not Tax: $338.78 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $18.74 3914 CEDARVALE DR Toed Assessed Value: $81300.00 Too Tax: $357.52 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Dab (mlyr): 0 0 Bale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bum: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. fL- amw 5411 BEDS: BATH: City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Coder Gyve Redevelopment Project Area A-11 t P MAP ID: 61 TAXPN: 101 g50050p1 Acres (total scree of Tat Parcel): 0.1 Pl OW -y Owner: MARK S TSTE PAARANTO Assessed Land V": $8,700.00 Nat Tax: $355.66 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aseesanteni $18.60 3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $8,700.00 Total Tax: $37526 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 aab Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land use buds.: SA Bldg. Data: Year BLOL Bu9ding Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: tiersge ft tt BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 62 TAXPN: 1018115008001 Acres (toed acres of Tax Parcel): 02 Property 0wim MARKS TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: $9.000.00 Not Tax: $300.84 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Auawn d $0.00 3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $9.000.00 Told Tax: $300.84 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Lad SW Dab ("Oft 0 0 $de Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yaw Built: Building Type: Rd"" Bldg. $q. 1L_ as"I" ft k BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 63 TAXPN: 101890109000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Property Owner: MINNESOTAS CREDITt1N10N Assessed Lard Value: $3,000.00 NO Tax: $122.06 38W SIBLEY MEMORIAL NY" Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 BpeeW Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $3,000.00 Total Tat: $122.06 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Dab (rr4T): 0 0 Baal Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC LMW tin Heide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Buuc Building Type: Finlat" Bag. $q. it ts.rage aq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 64 TAXPN: IOIND104M Acres (tote acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3 Property Owtm M INNESOTAS CREDMJNION Assessed Land Value: $6.300.00 Not Tax: 1255.90 3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aseesalrwrd $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $6.300.00 Total Tax: $255.90 EAGAN MN 55122 Lao Sob Dab (no* 0 0 aW Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Lard Use Wide: SA Bldg. Data: VOW BURL bUlk" Type: Finished Bag. as it_ tlarage Wit BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 65 TAXPN: 161890104001 Acres ttohd acres of Tax Paroel): 0.7 Progrty 0wmr MINNESOTAS CREDf1UNION Assessed Land Value: 572.800.00 Not Tax: $10.815.70 3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL Hwy Assessed Bldg. Value: $246.100.00 $peeld Aseesamani $0.00 TOW Assessed Value: $320,900.00 Total Tax: $10,815.70 EAGAN MN 55122 Loa Saw Dab (Neyr): 4 1995 gab Value: $274.204.00 Zoning: CSC WW Use Wide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw BUR: 1975 Building Type: BANK FkVGW Bldg. Bq. It.: 9.720.0 WMage Sq. it: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 66 TAXPN: . 10$880001001 Acres (W W Bens of Tax Parcel): 1.3 P opoly Owns: JENSEN JENSEN & JENSEN PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $116,500.00 Nel Tax: $26.385.88 3840 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $598.500.00 Special AooesmrM $395.50 TOW Assessed Value: $715.000.00 Told Tax: $26,781.38 EAGAN MN 55122-1412 Last Sob Dab (Hvy* 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Wide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1974 sum" Type: RESTAURANT Finial" Bag. $q, fL- 7.995.0 WMage Sq 1t 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 City of Fagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-12 /O/ MAP ID: 67 TAXPN: 101690101001 Acres (toed aces of Tax Parcel): 3.5 Property Olwrwr: CEDARVALE BOWL INC Assessed Land Value. 6288,700.00 Nel Tau: 630,455.46 3BB3 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 6531,300.00 Special Assessment 6802.80 Total Assessed Value: 6800,000.00 Total Tax: 631,258.26 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sals Dab (nVyr): 0 0 Bids Value: 60.00 Zoning: CSC LrW Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1979 Buadlng Type: BWLNGIILLEY Finished Bldg. Sq. R.- 32,961.0 Garage Sq. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 4 MAP ID: 68 _ TAXPIN: 101690101000 Aces (total sass of Tax Parcel)- 02 Property Owner: ANA CORPORATION Assessed Land Value: 63,300.00 NO Tax: 697.38 3830 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 60.00 Special AsaeMlnart 60.00 Total Assessed Value: 63.300.00 TOW Tax: 697.38 EAGAN MN 55122-1412 Last Sae Deb (mfyr~ 0 0 Gab Value: 60.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Vow Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft_ Qrape Sq. It: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 69 TAXPN: 101690102001 Acre (total aces of Tax Psreel): 1.3 Property Owner: IMAD ANSARI Assessed Land Value: 598.700.00 Net Tax: 55.832.22 4365 CAPRICORN CT Assessed Bldg. Value: $94,300.00 Spa" Asesstnnni $519.90 Total Assessed Value: $193,000.OD Toed Tax: 66,352.12 EAGAN MN 551231850 Last Sae Dab (Wyr): 7 1993 Bas Value: 5150,OOD.00 Zoning: CSC Land the Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1978 building Type: CDNV STORE Finished Bldg. Sq. H: 3,045.0 QW"s Sq. ft 0 BEDS: O BATH: 2 MAP ID: 70 TAXPN: 100190005004 Acres (toed aces of Tay Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner JR MEGA INC Assessed Led Value: 687200.00 Net Tax: 611,816.50 %GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: 6263,000.00 Spsdel Assessment 60.00 29W HAYES DRIVE Toed Assessed Value: 6350.200.00 Total Tax: 611,816.50 BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last Sae Dab (ontyr): 10 1988 SW Value: 6335.500.00 Zoning: CSC Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Bunt: 1972 Buildng Type: WHSE,STRG FinMW Bldg. 111% f4 23.M.0 Garage ft tl: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 71 TAXPN: 100190006004 Aces (toed acres of Tau Parcel): 0.8 Property Owner JA MEGA INC Assessed Led Value: 667.900.00 Nat Taz 52.83722 %GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: $1.900.00 Special Aesessonant 60.00 2908 HAYES DRIVE Toed Assessed Value: 589,800.00 Total Tax: $2.83722 BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last See Deb (mfyr): 0 0 See Value- 60.00 Zoning: CSC Land the Quids: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: sWlmrg Type: Firishsd Bldg. Sq. fL: drags Sq ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 72 TAXPN: 100190002004 Aces (toed ease of Tax Prot): 1.1 Property Owner. C B & R ENT Assessed Led Value: 692.400.00 Net Tax: 68.537.56 3810 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 6116,600.00 SpecW Awasenurrt 60.00 Toed Assessed Value: $209,000.00 Toed Tax: 68,537.56 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1412 Last Bob Data (nVyr): 0 0 See Value: 60.00 Zoning: CSC Led the Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew BuItL- 1964 building Type: WHSE STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 9,554.0 Garage Sq. ft: O BEDS: 0 BATH: 5 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-13 looZ t i MAP ID: 73 TAXPN: 100190003004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner C B d R ENT Assessed Land Value: $85.900.00 Not Tax: $11277.10 3035 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $231,200.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $317.000.00 Total Tax: $11277.10 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1402 Lest Sale flab (nV r): 0 0 SW Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use GuWe: SA Bldg. Date: YewBullt: 1972 Building Type; WKSF-STRG Finished Bidg. Sq. ft.- ts,s99.0 Garage Sq n 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 74 TAXPN: 100190001004 Acres (total acres of Tax Pla Y 0.7 Property Ownw HANNA 6 KATHLEEN NASR Assessed Land Value: $103.100.00 WIT= $4.659.54 % EXPRESS DONUTS Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,900.00 Special Assessment $44544 3008 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Total Assessed Value: $155,000.00 Total Tax: $5,105.38 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1412 LM Sale Dab (a** 6 1988 SW Value: $175,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Date: Yew awn: 1972 Building Type: RESTAURANT Finialed Bldg. Sq. ft-- 1.453.0 Garage Sp. ft 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 80 TAXPN: 104445001001 Acres (total memo of Tax Plc 0.4 Property Owner CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Wed Value: $29.400.00 Not Tax: $1.324.56 3BW PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $113,000.00 SpeeW Aooesst ent $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $142,400.00 Total Tax: $1,324.56 EAGAN MN 65122 Last Sale flab (mVyr): 11 2000 llele Value: $145,000.00 Zoning: R-1 Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Date: Year Built' 1958 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Rrdo" Bldg. Sq. ft: 2,00D.0 Gangs Sq. It- 0 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 MAP ID: 81 TAXPN: 104445002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Pwoal) 0.4 ProPwtY Owner. ALBERT 5 ALMA BIRR Assessed Land Value: $32,100.00 NOT= $1,289.30 1930 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $95,900.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $128,000.00 TotalTax: $1289.30 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last Sale Dab (n**: 0 0 SW Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-1 Wed Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Bwn: 1962 ou"ng Type: S.FAM.RES FirYttled Bldg. Sq. ft: 1,248.0 Garage Sq. ft 1216 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 82 TAXPN: 104445003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Pwoal) 0.4 Property Owner JEFFREY G 6 MARY M HALL Assessed Land Value: $33,800.00 Net Tax: $1.159.40 1940 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $89,300.0$1 Special Aesesamerd $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $123,100.00 Total Tax: $1,159.40 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last SW Dab (mlyr): 5 1967 Sale Value: $70,000.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Date: Yew Bwn: 1952 Budding T"w: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1.428.0 Gangs Sq. ft: 672 BEDS: 4 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 83 TAXPN: 104446004001 Acres (tool saes of Tax PwcsQ. 0.5 Property Owner. THOMAS G i JULIE A WOOONER Assessed L=W Value: $33,800.00 NO Tax: $1.528.42 3016 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $113.000.00 Special As9esemont $159.02 Total Assessed Value: $146,800.00 Total Tax: $11685.44 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1401 Lest SW Dab (rntyr): 4 1991 Sale Value: $85.000.00 Zoning: R•1 Land Lim Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yw Buln: 1958 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finial Bldg. Sq. ft- 1.184.0 GWage Sq ft 0 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for flee Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-14 /D,3 MAP ID: 84 TAXPN: 104445006101 Acres (total sates of Tat Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner: TONG YIA 6 ILIA VANG LOR Assessed Laid Value: $32,100.00 Net Tat: $1,156.72 3= BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $64.500.00 Special Aaesamerd $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $116.600.00 Toth Tat: $1,156.72 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1401 Leer Sale Daft (rNy►): a 1990 sale Value. $8D.900.00 Zoning: R-1 Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: TwaWIL, 19W BuftngT"n: s.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. $q. 1L: 1.661.0 Gangs Sq. ft- 464 BEDS: 3 BATH: 125 MAP ID: 85 TAXPN: 10446006201 Acres (toed acres of Tat Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner: ALBERT E HORROCKS Assessed Land Value: $30.500.00 Net Tat: $464.74 PO BOX 157 Assessed skip. Value: WOO OO SpecW Aaseasrnanll $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $30,500.00 Total Tat: $464.74 CLARKS GROVE MN SW16-0157 Last Sale Data (miyry 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-1 Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: VwBulfc Building TV"- Finished sag. 84 ft.: Grog. Sq. ft- BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 86 TAXPN: 10"45009001 Acres (tool acres of Tat Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner DORIS R TSTE D RUNE Assessed Lad Value: $33.000.00 NH Tat: $1,951.16 3630 ALDER LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $135,700.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $169,500.00 Total Ts= $1,951.16 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1501 Last SW Deb (Rlfyr): 0 0 Bob Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew suit 1961 Building Type: &FAM.RIES Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: 2,484.0 Gerape Sq. ft 440 BEDS: 4 BATH: 225 MAP ID: 87 TAXPN: 10445010101 Acres (WW acres of Tax ParoNp 0.5 Property Owner REM METRO SERVICES INC Assessed Land Value: $35.600.00 NN Tax: $2,506.36 8921 YORK AVE S Assessed Bldg. Value: $130,500.00 Special Ateaaanleni $0.00 Toed Assessed Value: $166,100.00 Total Tat: $2,506.36 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435-2587 Last Sab Deis (nWW: 7 1993 tied Value: $120,000.00 Zoning: R• 1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Tow Bunk: 1900 Building Type: S.FAM.RES FiniMled Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,824.0 Oerege Sq. fe 962 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 MAP ID: 88 TAXPN: 104730001001 Acres (bW acres of Tat Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner DAKOTA COUNTY HRA Assessed two Value: $24,000.00 Net Tax: $0.00 2496145TH ST W Assessed Bldg. Value: $180.200.00 Special Aa nwmd $0.00 Toed Assessed Value: $184200.00 Total Ta: $0.00 ROSEMOILNT MN 55068.4947 Last Sob Daft (IlVwY 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: R•2 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Vow Built 1977 SuNdng Type: TWIN HOME FinsW Bldg. So, ft.: 1,136.0 'n 9 rae ft fe 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 Bldg. Data: Vow Bu9t: 1977 BuildingTyps: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. 5% tl.: 1,136.0 Gsrap Sq. tt: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 89 TAXPN: 104730002001 Acres (IoW acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property t)w m JAMES A NUEY Assessed Land Value: $40.800.00 Net Tax: $2.581.90 1993 GOLD TRAIL Assessed Bldg. Value: $154,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Toed Assessed Value: $195.400.00 Toed Ta: $2,581.911 EAGAN MN 55122-1589 Last Sale Dab (mfyr): 6 1999 Bob Value: $135.000.00 Toning: R-2 Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Tow Built 1977 Building Type: TWIN NOME Finalled Bldg. Sq. ft- 1.1720 flange fiq.1C 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 Bldg. Data: Yw buft 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished aldg. Sq. ft: 1.1720 Garage $q ft: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 - City of Eagan. Minnesota Redevelopment PLn for the Cedar Grove Redevelopmatt Project Area A-15 I p MAP ID: 90 TAXPN: 104730003001 Apes (lotal acne of Tax Parcel): 0.6 Property Owner. RONALD D CASPER Assessed Land Value: $40,800.00 Not Tax: $1,671.82 1989 GOLD TR Assessed Bldg. Valve: $150.600.00 Special Asaeanent $0.00 Total Assessed Vahrw $191,200.00 Total Tax: $1,671.82 EAGAN MN 55122-15% Last SW Dole (mty* 6 $998 Sae Vahr: $148.000.00 Zoning: R-2 Land Use Gulde: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Bunt: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finehed Bldg. Sq. It.: 1.156.0 Grage 541L• 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. fl: 1.156.0 Grays sq. fC 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 91 TAXPN: 100190002009 Acres (toed aces d Tax Pmreel): 2.4 Pnprty Owner CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Valves $15.11W.00 !nit Tax: $0.00 3795 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg VNur. $0.00 Special Aeeesrrlent $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $15,800.00 Total Tax: $0.00 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1318 Lest SW Do" (ftv* 0 0 sae Valut-. $0.00 Zoning: P LrW Use Guide: P Bldg. Data: Yew Buft Did" Type: Finished Olds. Sq. ft.: Gantge Sari: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 92 TAXPN: 1011110007001 Apes (total apms of Talc Parcel: 0.8 Property Owner: DARYL J i NORI A HART Assessed LAW Value- $54,900.00 Not Tax: $1,612.42 3850 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Vmiw: $97,900.00 Special Aseeesnrnt $0.00 Toed Assessed Vskm- $152.800.00 Total Tax: $1,612.42 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Lao Sae Dab (ftV* 10 1994 Sob Value: $100.000.00 Zoning: R11 Land Use rookie: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Buft. 1934 Building Type: S.FAWRES Finished Bldg. sq. III.: 1.440.D Garage ft III:- 938 BEDS: 1 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 93 TAXPN: 1041,1170001000 Apes (total mans of Tax Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner. TERRY E TSTE STOVER Assessed Land Value. $47,800.00 Net Tim $1,243.46 3906 RAHN RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Aaeesmmneni $62322 Total Assessed Value: $47.800.00 Total Tax: $1,866.68 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1523 Lest sae Dote ("Oft 0 0 Sae Vahw: $0.00 Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: Building Type: Finialnd Bldg. 6% R: Orrgs Sq.1C BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 95 TAXPN: 100170002054 Acre (toW apes of Tax Prat: 12 ►roperty Owrm FRANCHISE REALTY NT CORP Assessed Land Value: $189.400.00 NO Tax: $16.419.34 THOMAS P BUTLER Assessed Bldg. Value: $275,800.00 Special Asetwneni SO.DO 7735 GIBRALTAR TERR Total Assessed Value. $465,000.00 Total Tax: $16,419.34 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124.6124 Lao Sale Dow (ftv* 0 0 Sae Valet: $0.00 Z N ft: GB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1974 Building Type: REST FSTFD Finiifltd Bldg Sq. V-: 4,564.0 Grape ft it: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 96 TAXPN: 10111110001001 Acns (toed apse d Tax Pmn:el): 6.5 Proprly Owner CHASKA INV LTD P NSHP Assessed LAW Vmare $582.000.00 No Tax: 537,362.96 7301 OHMS LANE Assessed Bldg. Value.. $413.000.00 Special Aseomm t $0.00 SUITE 390 Total Assessed Value: $1,005,000.00 TOW Tax: $37,362.96 EDINA MN $5439-2351 too Sae Dab (nVy* 0 0 Sob Value: $0.00 Zoning: NS Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Buiil: 1979 Building Type: SHPCTR NBH Finished Bldg. ft fL: 39.920.0 Garage 114 ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 13 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Dove Redevelopment Project Area A-16 . lay- MAP ID: 97 TAXPN: 1016115011101 Atxse (total Sens Of Tax ParoN): 0.0 Property Owner MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value. $1,100.00 NotTax. $3228 3900 CEDARVALE OR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assesartsrd $2.66 Total Assessed Value: $1,100.00 Total Tax: $34.94 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Soft Dab (nVy* 0 0 sate Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: YwBuilt: BuildingTyps: Finistrd Bldg. Sw f1.: Garage ft ft BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 98 TAXPN: 1061120001000 Acre (total acme at Tax Paroel): 0.0 Property owner: DUM REALTY LTD PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $100.00 Not Tax: $3.62 % ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 special Assesenrnt $0.00 1550 UTICA AVE S. SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $100.00 Total Tax: $3.62 ST LOUIS PARK AAN 55416 Last sale Dab (no* 0 0 SW Value. $0.00 Zoning: PD LOW Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew9WI : au"ngType: Finished Bldg. Sq. fL• Garage ft it BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 99 TAXPN: 106820001001 Acres (total acres of Tax POplj: 16.6 Property Owner. DUKE REALTY LTD PTNSHP Assessed LOW Value: $1.265,300.00 Net Tax: 5306,18720 % ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $6,639,700.00 Spa" Assessnwd $12.074.84 1550 UTICA AVE S SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $7,905,000.00 TOWS Tax: $318.262.01 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Last Soft Dab (mly* O 0 sate Value. $0.00 Zoning: PD LOW Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 19911 Building Type: WHSE STRG Finished Bldg. ft fL- 235,00D.0 Garage ft ft' 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: a Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Totals Total Area (acres.): 164.1 Total Finished Bldg. 910,984.00 City of Eagan, Minnesota Rodevclopnwnt Plan for ttheCoder Grove Redevelopment Project Area A-17 ~ i Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Parcels or Portions of Parcels in Right-of-way Taxpin Right-of-way Owner name Parcel Acreage 100190001025 SHELDON & MARY RAMNARINE 0.066 100190001102 BERNARD J MULCAHYCO INC 0.585 100190002004 C B & R ENT 0.052 100190003004 C B & R ENT 0283 100190006004 JR MEGA INC 0.121 100190001106 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.028 100190001006 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.296 100190002009 CITY OF EAGAN 0.219 100190002026 STATE OF MN 3.365 100190001426 STATE OF MN 1.221 100190005106 WAYZATA BAY CTR CO 0.645 100190001226 CITY OF EAGAN 1.096 100190001111 LEO MOGOL 0.332 100190001008 SINCLAIR MARKETING INC 0.131 100190001211 LEO MOGOL 0.114 100190002007 STEVE J & JANE M MARTIN 0.123 100190004008 ROCKY L RANCH 0.064 100190005008 JEFFREY D & SARAH J SCHENDEL 0.045 100190001107 JOHN W FTIZGERALD 0.078 100190004112 JOOS ELECTRIC CO 0.119 100190008008 JOSEPH R MILBAUER 0.449 100190008006 JOHN E & KATHLEEN LUNDEEN 0.238 100190004212 JOHN R LACHENMAYER 0.065 100190003012 HANSEN METCALF ENT 0.091 100190002012 GORDON & ALICE KOPACEK 0.098 100190007008 BTA INV 0.39 100190002027 STATE OF MN 1.303 100190009008 JEFFREY SCHENDEL 0.182 100190010008 WING K SETO 0.673 100190001027 STATE OF MN 1.46 City of Eagan, Minnesota Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Ama A-18 /6). As of September 26, 2001 Draft for City Council Review TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN for the establishment of TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 (a redevelopment district) within THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA EAGAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF EAGAN STATE OF MINNESOTA Public Hearing: October 2, 2001 Adopted: EHLERS Prepared by: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1105 i A S S O C I A T E S I N C 651-697-8500 fax: 651-697-8555 www.ehiers-inc.com 0 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS (for reference purposes only) SECTION II TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 2-1 Subsection 2-1. Foreword 2-1 Subsection 2-2. Statutory Authority 2-1 Subsection 2-3. Statement of Objectives 2-1 Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview 2-1 Subsection 2-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired . 2-2 Subsection 2-6. Classification of the District 2-3 Subsection 2-7. Duration of the District 2-5 Subsection 2-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements 2-5 Subsection 2-9. Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness 2-6 Subsection 2-10. Uses of Funds 2-7 Subsection 2-11. Fiscal Disparities Election 2-8 Subsection 2-12. Business Subsidies 2-8 Subsection 2-13. County Road Costs 2-9 Subsection 2-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions 2-9 Subsection 2-15. Supporting Documentation 2-10 Subsection 2-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues 2-10 Subsection 2-17. Modifications to the District 2-10 Subsection 2-18. Administrative Expenses 2-11 Subsection 2-19. Limitation of Increment 2-11 Subsection 2-20. Use of Tax Increment 2-12 Subsection 2-21. Excess Tax Increments 2-13 Subsection 2-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer 2-13 Subsection 2-23. Assessment Agreements 2-13 Subsection 2-24. Administration of the District 2-14 Subsection 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements 2-14 Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations 2-14 Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment 2-14 Subsection 2-28. Summary 2-15 APPENDIX A - PROJECT DESCRIPTION A-1 APPENDIX B - MAPS OF THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND THE DISTRICT B-2 APPENDIX C - DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT C-1 APPENDIX D - ESTIMATED CASH FLOW FOR THE DISTRICT D-1 APPENDIX E - MINNESOTA BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FORM E-1 APPENDIX F - REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT F-1 APPENDIX G - BUT/FOR QUALIFICATIONS G-1 A~F SECTION II TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1 Subsection 2-1. Foreword The Eagan Economic Development Authority (the "EDA"), the City of Eagan (the "City"), staff and consultants have prepared the following information to expedite the establishment of Tax Increment Financing District No. I ("the District"), a redevelopment tax increment financing district, located in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. Subsection 2-2. Statutory Authority Within the City, there exist areas where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. To this end, the EDA and City have certain statutory powers pursuant to Minnesota Statutes ("M.S. 469.090 through 469.1081, inclusive, as amended, and M.S., Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended (the "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act"), to assist in financing public costs related to this project. This Section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Plan") for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1. Other relevant information is contained in the Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. Subsection 2-3. Statement of Objectives The District currently consists of 92 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. The District is being created to facilitate a mixed-use redevelopment incorporating owner-occupied and rental housing, retail and commercial development, and transit features in the City of Eagan. Contracts for this have not been entered into at the time of preparation of this Plan, but the date when development is likely to occur is Fall 2001. This Plan is expected to achieve many of the objectives outlined in the Redevelopment Plan for the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area. The activities contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan and the Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified development or redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area and the District. The Cedar Grove Redevelopment Plan is on file at the Eagan City Hall. Subsection 2-4. Redevelopment Plan Overview 1. Property to be Acquired - Selected property located within the District may be acquired by the EDA or City and is further described in this Plan. 2. Relocation - Relocation services,- to the extent required by law, are available pursuant to M.S., Chapter 117 and other relevant state and federal laws. 3. Upon approval of a developer's plan relating to the project and completion of the necessary legal requirements, the EDA or City may sell to a developer selected properties that they may acquire within the District or may lease land or facilities to a developer. 4. The EDA or City may perform or provide for some or all necessary acquisition, Eagan Economic Development Authority 'tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 1 2-1 D i l construction, relocation, demolition, and required utilities and public streets work within the District. Subsection 2-5. Description of Property in the District and Property To Be Acquired The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way identified by the parcels listed in Appendix C. See the map in Appendix B for further information on the location of the District. Parcel Numbers 106806003200 100190004212 101690103000 106806002000 100190001211 101690104001 106806004001 100190001008 103880001001 106806005001 100190009008 101690101001 101960001001 100190002008 101690101000 100190001102 100190003008 101690102001 107550001001 100190007008 100190005004 107550001000 100190004008 100190006004 100190002025* 100190005008 100190002004 100190003025* 100190008008 100190003004 101370007001 100190002007 100190001004 101370006001 100190008006 104445001001 101370005001 100190001107 104445002001 101370004001 100190005106 104445003001 101370003001 100190001006 104445004001 101370002001 100190001106 104445006101 101370001001 100190007106 104445006201 100190001003 100190007206 104445009001 101670204108 100190007306 104445010101 101670203108 100190007406 104730001001 101670202008 101685012201 104730002001 101670201008 101685012301 104730003001 100190010008 101685003101 100190002009 101352001000 101685009001 104480001001 101352001001 101685008101 108470001000 101352002001 101685008201 100170002054 100190002012 101685004001 106810001001 100190003012 101685005001 101685011101 101670201000 101685006001 106820001000 100190001111 101690104000 106820001001 100190004112 * The City has proposed that parcel numbers 100190002025 and 100190003025 be combined prior to certification of the District, no later than June 30, 2002. If the lot combination does not take place prior to that date, parcel number 100190003025 will be eliminated from the District. z-2 The District will also include the following right-of-way parcels: 100190001025 100190005106 100190008008 100190001102 100190001226 100190008006 100190002004 100190001111 100190004212 100190003004 100190001008 100190003012 100190006004 100190001211 100190002012 100190001106 100190002007 100190007008 100190001006 100190004008 100190002027 100190002009 100190005008 100190009008 100190002026 100190001107 100190010008 100190001426 100190004112 100190001027 The EDA or City may acquire any parcel within the District including interior and adjacent street rights of way. Any properties identified for acquisition will be acquired by the EDA or City only in order to accomplish one or more of the following: storm sewer improvements; provide land for needed public streets, utilities and facilities; carry out land acquisition, site improvements, clearance and/or development to accomplish the uses and objectives set forth in this plan. The EDA or City may acquire property by gift, dedication, condemnation or direct purchase from willing sellers in order to achieve the objectives of this Plan. Such acquisitions will be undertaken only when there is assurance of funding to finance the acquisition and related costs. Subsection 2-6. Classification of the District The EDA and City, in determining the need to create a tax increment financing district in accordance with M.S., Sections 469.174 to 469.179, as amended, inclusive, find that the District, to be established, is a redevelopment district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) as defined below: (a) 'Redevelopment district" means a type of tax increment financing district consisting of a project, or portions of a project, within which the authorityfinds by resolution that one or more of the following conditions, reasonably distributed throughout the district, exists: (1) parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance; or (2) The property consists of vacant, unused, underused, inappropriately used, or infrequently used rail yards, rail storage facilities or excessive or vacated railroad rights-of-way; or (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in Section 115C, Subd. 15, if the tank facility: (i) have or had a capacity of more than one million gallons; (ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities; or (iii) have been removed, or are unused, underused, inappropriately used or infrequently used.. 2-3 ~ 1 (b) For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition ofinteriorpartitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. (c) A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs or other similar reliable evidence. The municipality may not make such a determination without an interior inspection of the property, but need not have an independent, expert appraisal prepared of the cost of repair and rehabilitation of the building. An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipalityfinds that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard. (d) A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building for purposes of the finding under paragraph (a) if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as pan of the district with the county auditor; (2) the substandard building was demolished or removed by the authority or the demolition or removal was financed by the authority or was done by a developer under a development agreement with the authority; (3) the authority found by resolution before the demolition or removal that the parcel was occupied by a structurally substandard building and that afterdemolition and clearance the authority intended to include the parcel within a district; and (4) upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district, the authority notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted as provided by § 469.177, subdivision 1, paragraph (h). (e) For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures unless 15 percent of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures. (fl For districts consisting of two or more noncontiguous areas, each area must qualify as a redevelopment district under paragraph (a) to be included in the district, and the entire area of the district must satisfy paragraph (a). In meeting the statutory criteria the EDA and City will rely on the following facts and findings: ❑ The District is a redevelopment district consisting of 92 parcels. 113 2-d 0 An inventory showing that parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures will be completed prior to approval by the City. o An inspection of the buildings located within the District finding that more than 50 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard as defined in the TIF Act will be completed prior to approval by the City (See Appendix F). Pursuant to 469.176 Subd. 7, the District does not contain any parcel or part of a parcel that qualified under the provisions of Section 273.111 or 273.112 of Chapter 473H for taxes payable in any of the five calendar years before the filing of the request for certification of the District. Subsection 2-7. Duration of the District Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 1, and Section 469.176, Subd. 1, the duration of the District must be indicated within the Plan. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. Ib, the duration of the District will be 25 years after receipt of the first increment by the EDA or City (a total of 26 years). The date of receipt by the City of the first tax increment is expected to be 2003. Thus, it is estimated that the District, including any modifications of the Plan for subsequent phases or other changes, would terminate after 2028, or when the Plan is satisfied. Subsection 2-8. Original Tax Capacity, Tax Rate and Estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity Value/Increment and Notification of Prior Planned Improvements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. land M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the Original Net Tax Capacity (ONTC) as certified for the District will be based on the market values placed on the property by the assessor in 2001 for taxes payable 2002. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subds. 1 and 2, the County Auditor shall certify in each year (beginning in the payment year 2002) the amount by which the original value has increased or decreased as a result of: 1. change in tax exempt status of property; 2. reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the district; 3. change due to adjustments, negotiated or court-ordered abatements; 4. change in the use of the property and classification; 5. change in state law governing class rates; or 6. change in connection with previously issued building permits. In any year in which the current Net Tax Capacity value of the District declines below the ONTC, no value will be captured and no tax increment will be payable to the EDA or City. The original local tax rate for the District will be the local tax rate for taxes payable 2002, assuming the request for certification is made before June 30, 2002. The Original Tax Capacity and the Original Local Tax Rate for the District appear in the table below. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174 Subd. 4 and M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, 2, and 4, the estimated Captured Net Tax Capacity (CTC) of the District, within the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, upon completion of the project, will annually approximate tax increment revenues as shown in the table below. The EDA and City request 100 percent of the available increase in tax capacity for repayment of its obligations and current expenditures, beginning in the tax year payable 2003. The project tax capacity listed is an estimate of values when the project is completed. 2-5 ~ 1 PrQJe t Estimated Tax Capacity upon Completion $ 2,916,000 (PTQ Original Estimated Net Tax Capacity(ONTC) $ 6187822 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity (CTC) $ 2,297,179 Original Local Tax Rate 0.96578 Estimated Annual Tax Increment(CTC x Local Tax $2,218,570 Rate) Percent Retained by the EDA 100% Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 4, the EDA shall, after due and diligent search, accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor or its notice of the District enlargement pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, with a listing of all properties within the District or area of enlargement for which building permits have been issued during the eighteen (18) months immediately preceding approval of the Plan by the municipality pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 3. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the District by the net tax capacity of improvements for which a building permit was issued. The EDA is reviewing the area to be included in the District to determine if any building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the Plan by the City. Subsection 2-9. Sources of Revenue/Bonded Indebtedness Public improvement costs, acquisition, relocation, utilities, parking facilities, streets and sidewalks, and site preparation costs and other costs outlined in the Uses of Funds will be financed primarily through the annual collection of tax increments. The EDA or City reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally ap- plicable to the EDA or City and the Plan, including, but not limited to, special assessments, general property taxes, state aid for road maintenance and construction, proceeds from the sale of land, other contributions from the developer and investment income, to pay for the estimated public costs. The EDA or City reserves the right to incur bonded indebtedness or other indebtedness as a result of the Plan. As presently proposed, the project will be financed by a pay-as-you-go note. Additional indebtedness may be required to finance other authorized activities. The total principal amount of bonded indebtedness or other indebtedness related to the use of tax increment financing will not exceed $33,230,000 without a modification to the Plan pursuant to applicable statutory requirements. This provision does not obligate the EDA or City to incur debt. The EDA or City will issue bonds or incur other debt only upon the determination that such action is in the best interest of the City. The EDA or City may also finance the activities to be undertaken pursuant to the Plan through loans from funds of the EDA or City or to reimburse the developer on a "pay-as-you-go" basis for eligible costs paid for by a developer. The estimated sources of funds for the District are contained in the table below. //So" 2-6 SOURCES OF FUNDS TOTAL Tax Increment $51,500,000 Local Contribution $0 PROJECT REVENUES $51,500,000 Subsection 2-10. Uses of Funds Currently under consideration for the District is a significant redevelopment effort of the City of Eagan. The project cost is estimated to be $200 million to $250 million. The project is focused on replacing a market obsolete regional shopping center, providing new life cycle housing options for existing Eagan residents, enhancing the public transit framework and correcting a number of traffic problems with the project area. Redevelopment will be guided by a 1999 community planning study "Village Plaza - A Redevelopment Concept for the Cedar/l3 Area." and a subsequent concept refinement accepted by the EDA. The redevelopment is expected to occur in stages over the next two to seven years. The City has received development proposals for approximately 80% of the redevelopment area from several different developers. Proposed developed may potentially include 600,000 square feet of office, 300,000 square feet of office showroom, 120,000 square feet of retail, 200 hotel units, 350 for sale houses, and 950 multi-family (including senior) housing units. Public improvements including upgrade of Silver Bell Road - Cedarvale Boulevard intersection, relocation of Cedarvale Boulevard, modifications to Beau d' Rue Drive, modifications to existing buildings, storm water control, landscaping and other related improvements will also be part of project costs. The EDA and City have determined that it will be necessary to provide assistance to the project for certain costs. The EDA has studied the feasibility of the development or redevelopment of property in and around the District. To facilitate the establishment and development or redevelopment of the District, this Plan authorizes the use of tax increment financing to pay for the cost of certain eligible expenses. The estimate of public costs and uses of funds associated with the District is outlined in the following table. USES OF FUNDS TOTAL Land/Building Acquisition $14,650,000 Site Improvements/Preparation $6,100,000 Public Utilities $2,440,000 Parking Facilities $2,440,000 Building Renovation $1,900,000 Streets and Sidewalks $5,700,000 Interest $13,130,000 Administrative Costs (up to 10%) $5,140,000 PROJECT COSTS TOTAL $51,500,000 Estimated costs associated with the District are subject to change among categories without a modification to this Plan. The cost of all activities to be considered for tax increment financing will not exceed, without formal modification, the budget above pursuant to the applicable statutory requirements. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 2, no more than 25 percent of the tax increment paid by property within the District L 2-7 ~ 1 will be spent on activities related to development or redevelopment outside of the District but within the boundaries of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area, (including administrative costs, which are considered to be spent outside of the District) subject to the limitations as described in this Plan. The City intends to expend 15 percent of the increment to create a Business Renovation Fund. This Fund will assist businesses which were identified in the planning process as those to remain in the District. The Fund is intended to provide financial assistance to these businesses and prevent the future deterioration of the area in the District. Subsection 2-11. Fiscal Disparities Election Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, the EDA or City may elect one of two methods to calculate fiscal disparities. If the calculations pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause a, (outside the District) are followed, the following method of computation shall apply: (1) The original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity provisions of Chapter 276A or 473F. Where the original net tax capacity is equal to or greater than the current net tax capacity, there is no captured net tax capacity and no tax increment determination. Where the original net tax capacity is less than the current net tax capacity, the difference between the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity is the captured net tax capacity. This amount less any portion thereof which the authority has designated, in its tax increment financing plan, to share with the local taxing districts is the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority. (2) The count? auditor shall exclude the retained captured net tax capacity of the authorityfrom the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts in determining local taxing district tax rates. The local tax rates so determined are to be extended against the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority as well as the net tax capacity of the local taxing districts. The tax generated by the extension of the lesser of (A) the local taxing district tax rates or (B) the original local tax rate to the retained captured net tax capacity of the authority is the tax increment of the authority. The EDA or City shall submit to the County Auditor at the time of the request for certification which method of computation of fiscal disparities the EDA or City elected. The EDA will choose to calculate fiscal disparities by clause a. According to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 3: (c) The method of computation of tax increment applied to a district pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) shall remain the same for the duration of the district, except that the governing body may elect to change its election from the method of computation in paragraph (a) to the method in paragraph (b). Subsection 2-12. Business Subsidies To the extent applicable, the EDA or City agrees to comply with M.S., Section 116J.993 to 116J.994, which states that a local unit of government granting financial assistance to a business for economic development or job growth purposes, including tax increment financing, must establish business subsidy criteria and approve a business subsidy agreement with the business receiving the assistance. (See Appendix E). 2-8 Subsection 2-13. County Road Costs Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. la, the county board may require the EDA or City to pay for all or part of the cost of county road improvements if the proposed development to be assisted by tax increment will, in the judgement of the county, substantially increase the use of county roads requiring construction of road improvements or other road costs and if the road improvements are not scheduled within the next five years under a capital improvement plan or within five years under another county plan. In the opinion of the EDA and City and consultants, the proposed development outlined in this Plan will have little or no impact upon county roads. If the county elects to use increments to improve county roads, it must notify the EDA or City within forty-five days of receipt of this Plan. Subsection 2-14. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions The estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions assumes that the redevelopment contemplated by the Plan would occur without the creation of the District. However, the EDA or City has determined that such development or redevelopment would not occur "but for" tax increment financing and that, therefore, the fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions is $0. The table below illustrates the estimated fiscal impact of the District if the "but for" test was not met under the current property tax system. These numbers represent the best available information. It must be noted that the actual impacts would be based on lower Total Net Tax Capacity values and different Tax Extension Rates as a result of changes enacted by the State Legislature. IMPACT ON TAX BASE 2000/2001 Estimated Captured Total Net Tax Capacity (CTC) Percent of CTC Tax Capacity Upon Completion to Entity Total Dakota County 281,837,297 2,297,179 0.8151% City of Eagan 81,011,004 2,297,179 2.8356% ISD No. 191 53,135,427 2,297,179 4.3233% IMPACT ON TAX RATES 200012001 Percent Potential Extension Rates of Total CTC Taxes Dakota County 0.253200 26.22% 2,297,179 581,646 City of Eagan 0.234410 24.27% 2,297,179 538,482 ISD No. 191 0.450950 46.69% 2,297,179 1,035,913 Other: 0.027220 2.82% 2,297,179 62,529 Total 0.965780 100.00% 2,156,040 The estimates listed above display the captured tax capacity when all construction is completed. The tax rate used for calculations is the 2001/Pay 2002 rate. The total net capacity for the entities listed above are based on Pay 2001 figures. The District will be certified under the actual 2001/Pay 2002 rates, which were unavailable at the time this Plan was prepared. 2-9 llt?000, 1 1 Subsection 2-15. Supporting Documentation Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd la, clause 7 the Plan must contain identification and description of studies and analyses used to make the determination set forth in M.S. Section 469.175 Subd 3, clause (2). Following is a list of reports and studies on file at the City that support the authority's findings: Subsection 2-16. Definition of Tax Increment Revenues Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 25, tax increment revenues derived from a tax increment financing district include all of the following potential revenue sources: 1. taxes paid by the captured net tax capacity, but excluding any excess taxes, as computed underM.S., Section 469.177; 2. the proceeds from the sale or lease of property, tangible or intangible, purchased by the authority with tax increments; 3. repayments of loans or other advances made by the authority with tax increments; and 4. interest or other investment earnings on or from tax increments. Subsection 2-17. Modifications to the District In accordance with M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 4, any: 1. reduction or enlargement of the geographic area of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the District; 2. increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize interest on debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized; 3. increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the EDA or City; 4. increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures; or 5. designation of additional property to be acquired by the EDA or City, shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original Plan. Pursuant to M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 4(b), the geographic area of the District may be reduced, but shall not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original net tax capacity by the county auditor. If a redevelopment district is enlarged, the reasons and supporting facts for the determination that the addition to the district meets the criteria of M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 10, paragraph (a), clauses (1) to (5), must be documented in writing and retained. The requirements of this paragraph do not apply if (1) the only modification is elimination of parcel(s) from the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the District and (2) (A) the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcel(s) in the District's original net tax capacity or (B) the EDA agrees that, notwithstanding M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 1, the original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcel(s) eliminated from the District. The EDA or City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the District. Modifications to the District in the form of a budget modification or an expansion of the boundaries will be recorded in the Plan. / 2-10 Subsection 2-18. Administrative Expenses In accordance with M.S., Section 469.174, Subd. 14, and M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 3, administrative expenses means all expenditures of the EDA or City, other than: 1. amounts paid for the purchase of land; 2. amounts paid to contractors or others providing materials and services, including architectural and engineering services, directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; 3. relocation benefits paid to or services provided for persons residing or businesses located in the project; or 4. amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178; or 5. amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in sections 1 to 3. For districts for which the request for certification were made before August 1, 1979, or after June 30, 1982, administrative expenses also include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, and planning or economic development consultants. Tax increment may be used to pay any authorized and documented administrative expenses for the District up to but not to exceed 10 percent of the total tax increment expenditures authorized by the Plan or the total tax increments from the District, whichever is less. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4h, tax increments may be used to pay for the county's actual administrative expenses incurred in connection with the District. The county may require payment of those expenses by February 15 of the year following the year the expenses were incurred. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469. 177, Subd. 11, the county treasurer shall deduct an amount equal to 0.25 percent of any increment distributed to the EDA or City and the county treasurer shall pay the amount deducted to the state treasurer for deposit in the state general fund to be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting of tax increment financing information and the cost of examining and auditing authorities' use of tax increment financing. Subsection 2-19. Limitation of Increment Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. ]a, no tax increment shall be paid to the EDA or City for the District after three (3) years from the date of certification of the Original Net Tax Capacity value of the taxable property in the District by the County Auditor unless within the three (3) year period: (a) bonds have been issued in aid of the project containing the district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178, or any other law, except revenue bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Sections 469.152 to 469.165, or (b) the EDA or City has acquired property within the District, or (c) the EDA or City has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within the District. The bonds must be issued, or the EDA or City must acquire property or construct or cause public improvements to be constructed by approximately August, 2004 and report such actions to the County Auditor. 2-11 02 1 r The tax increment pledged to the payment of bonds and interest thereon may be discharged and the District may be terminated if sufficient funds have been irrevocably deposited in the debt service fund or other escrow account held in trust for all outstanding bonds to provide for the payment of the bonds at maturity or redemption date. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 6: if, after four years from the date of certification of the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, no demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation of utility service including sewer or water systems, has been commenced on a parcel located within a tax increment financing district by the authority or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, no additional tax increment may be taken from that parcel and the original net tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. If the authority or the owner of the parcel subsequently commences demolition, rehabilitation or renovation or other site preparation on that parcel including qualified improvement of a street adjacent to that parcel, in accordance with the tax increment financing plan, the authority shall certify to the county auditor that the activity has commenced and the county auditor shall certify the net tax capacity thereof as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue and add it to the original net tax capacity of the tax increment financing district. The county auditor must enforce the provisions of this subdivision. The authority must submit to the county auditor evidence that the required activity, has taken place for each parcel in the district. The evidence for a parcel must be submitted by February 1 of the fifth year following the year in which the parcel was certified as included in the district. For purposes of this subdivision, qualified improvements of a street are limited to (1) construction or opening of a new street, (2) relocation of a street, and(3) substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The EDA or City or a property owner must improve parcels within the District by approximately August, 2005 and report such actions to the County Auditor. Subsection 2-20. Use of Tax Increment The EDA or City hereby determines that it will use 100 percent of the captured net tax capacity of taxable property located in the District for the following purposes: I . to pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued to finance a project; 2. to finance, or otherwise pay the cost of redevelopment of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Project Area pursuant to the M.S., Sections 469.090 to 469.1081; 3. to pay for project costs as identified in the budget set forth in the Plan; 4. to finance, or otherwise pay for other purposes as provided in M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4; 5. to pay principal and interest on any loans, advances or other payments made to or on behalf the EDA or City or for the benefit of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area by a developer; 6. to finance or otherwise pay premiums and other costs for insurance or other security guaranteeing the payment when due of principal of and interest on bonds pursuant to the Plan or pursuant to M.S., Chapter 462C. M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178; and 7. to accumulate or maintain a reserve securing the payment when due of the principal and interest on the tax increment bonds or bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Chapter 4620, M.S., Sections 469.152 through 469.165, and/or M.S., Sections 469.178. 2-12 These revenues shall not be used to circumvent any levy limitations applicable to the City nor for other purposes prohibited by M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 4. Tax increments generated in the District will be paid by to the EDA for the Tax Increment Fund of said District. The EDA or City will pay to the developer(s) annually an amount not to exceed an amount as specified in a developer's agreement to reimburse the costs of land acquisition, public improvements, demolition and relocation, site preparation, and administration. Remaining increment funds will be used for EDA or City administration (up to 10 percent) and the costs of public improvement activities outside the District. Subsection 2-21. Excess Tax Increments Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. 2, in any year in which the tax increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the Plan, including the amount necessary to cancel any tax levy as provided in M.S., Section 475.61, Subd. 3, the EDA or City shall use the excess amount to do any of the following: 1. prepay any outstanding bonds; 2. discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor; 3. pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of such bonds; or 4. return the excess to the County Auditor for redistribution to the respective taxing jurisdictions in proportion to their local tax rates. In addition, the EDA or City may, subject to the limitations set forth herein, choose to modify the Plan in order to finance additional public costs in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area or the District. Subsection 2-22. Requirements for Agreements with the Developer The EDA or City will review any proposal for private development to determine its conformance with the Redevelopment Plan and with applicable municipal ordinances and codes. To facilitate this effort, the following documents may be requested for review and approval: site plan, construction, mechanical, and electrical system drawings, landscaping plan, grading and storm drainage plan, signage system plan, and any other drawings or narrative deemed necessary by the EDA or City to demonstrate the conformance of the development with City plans and ordinances. The EDA or City may also use the Agreements to address other issues related to the development. Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.176, Subd. S, no more than 25 percent, by acreage, of the property to be acquired in the District as set forth in the Plan shall at any time be owned by the EDA or City as a result of acquisition with the proceeds of bonds issued pursuant to M.S., Section 469.178 to which tax increments from property acquired is pledged, unless prior to acquisition in excess of 25 percent of the acreage, the EDA or City concluded an agreement for the development or redevelopment of the property acquired and which provides recourse for the EDA or City should the development or redevelopment not be completed. Subsection 2-23. Assessment Agreements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.177, Subd. 8, the EDA or City may enter into a written assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer of property within the District which establishes a minimum market value of the land and completed improvements for the duration of the District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and, so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears, 2-13 l t in the judgment of the assessor, to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor shall also certify the minimum market value agreement. Subsection 2-24. Administration of the District Administration of the District will be handled by the Assistant City Administrator. Subsection 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requirements Pursuant to M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5, 6 and 6a the EDA or City must undertake financial reporting for all tax increment financing districts to the Office of the State Auditor, County Board, County Auditor and School Board on or before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 469.175, Subd. 5 also provides that an annual statement shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on or before August 15. If the City fails to make a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S. Section 469.175 Subd. 5 and Subd. 6, the Office of the State Auditor will direct the County Auditor to withhold the distribution of tax increment from the District. Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations As required by the Tax Increment Financing Act, in establishing the District, the determination has been made that the anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Plan. In making said determination, reliance has been placed upon written representatives made by the developer to such effects and upon EDA and City staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site. A comparative analysis of estimated market values both with and without establishment of the District and the use of tax increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is included with the cashflow in Appendix D, and indicates that the increase in estimated market value of the proposed development (less the indicated subtractions) exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the District and the use of tax increments. Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on the Use of Tax Increment 1. General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax increment shall be used in accordance with the Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance, or otherwise pay the cost of redevelopment of the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area pursuant to the M.S., Sections 469.090 to 469.1081. These revenues shall not be used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No revenues derived from tax increment shall be used for the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the state or federal government or for a commons area used as a public park, or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This provision shall not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax increments for the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes. 2. Pooling Limitations. At least 75 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance activities within said district or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. Not more than 25 percent of said tax increments may be expended, through a development fund or otherwise, 2-14 402112 on activities outside of the District except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. For purposes of applying this restriction, all administrative expenses must be treated as if they were solely for activities outside of the District. The City intends to expend 10 percent of the increment on administrative expenses and to expend 15 percent of the increment to create a business assistance fund, which will assist businesses locating in the community. 3. Five Year Limitation on Commitment of Tax Increments. Tax increments derived from the District shall be deemed to have satisfied the 75 percent test set forth in paragraph (2) above only if the five year rule set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 3, has been satisfied; and beginning with the sixth year following certification of the District, 75 percent of said tax increments that remain after expenditures permitted under said five year rule must be used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit enhanced bonds as more fully set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 5. 4. Redevelopment District. At least 90 percent of the revenues derived from tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment and renewal and renovation districts underM.S., Section 469.176 Subd. 4j. These costs include, but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements orhazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of the land, the removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary for development of the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the EDA or City, including the cost of preparation of the development action response plan, may be included in the qualifying costs. Subsection 2-28. Summary The Eagan Economic Development Authority is establishing the District to preserve and enhance the tax base, redevelop substandard areas, and provide employment opportunities in the City. The Tax Increment Financing Plan for the District was prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc., 3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Minnesota 55113, telephone (651) 697-8500. z-ts r APPENDIX A PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Cedar Grove Tax Increment District is a significant redevelopment effort of the City of Eagan. The total development cost is estimated to be $200 million to $250 million. The project is focused on replacing a market obsolete regional shopping center, providing new life cycle housing options for existing Eagan residents, enhancing the public transit framework and correcting a number of traffic problems with the project area. Redevelopment will be guided by a 1999 community planning study "Village Plaza - A Redevelopment Concept for the Cedar/13 Area" and a subsequent concept refinement accepted by the EDA. The redevelopment is expected to occur in stages over the next two to seven years. The City has received development proposals for approximately 80% of the redevelopment area from several different developers. Proposed developed may potentially include 600,000 square feet of office, 300,000 square feet of office showroom, 120,000 square feet of retail, 200 hotel units, 350 for sale houses, and 950 multi-family (including senior) housing units. Public improvements including upgrade of Silver Bell Road - Cedarvale Boulevard intersection, relocation of Cedarvale Boulevard, modifications to Beau d' Rue Drive, modifications to existing buildings, storm water control, landscaping and other related improvements will also be part of project costs. More detailed information about the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area can be found in the Cedar Grove Redevelopment Plan on file at the Eagan City Hall. APPENDIX 40? a-] APPENDIX B MAP OF THE CEDAR GROVE REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND THE DISTRICT APPENDIX B-2 4 t ME ~ U CO M CL EU 13 • ` 3 kM. O O , O 41 IHL" ~Cp d n~ 9000 ~ o ~ ~ V •y~ : 0 LL J W 8' $ O Q D Z o C7 W W Z o rn 0 D W W Ei j W QI o O <W1yGG ( a W Z -W' > r 0 m w W" U W ( o a W m `AL 40. r 71, io~ 7A 13 Ire ~P a J _ i • -7R~. lip fir;,.` rte ~r ISO ION 44 its ♦ ~ ~ z jam; 4'~ fi tag r~ x 14, s4l e APPENDIX C DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DISTRICT The District encompasses all property and adjacent rights-of-way identified by the parcels listed on the following pages. APPENDIX ~ c-t 20-Jul-01 +City of Eagan Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Parcel/Building Information MAP ID: 1 TAXPIN: 106806003200 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 14.0 Property Owner: DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Land Value: $517,400.00 Net Tax: $19,797.16 % RONALD A HAVE Assessed Bldg. Value: 50.00 Special Assessment $0.00 8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $517,400.00 Total Tax: $19,797.16 BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sak Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: IND Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 2 TAXPIN: 10611IM02000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.1 Property Owner. DOVER PARTNERS Assessed Land Value: $70,000.00 Net Tax: $2,752.40 % RONALD A HAVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 8801 WOODCLIFF RD Total Assessed Value: $70,000.00 Total Tax: $2,752.40 BLOOMINGTON MN 55438 55438 Lost Sale Date (nlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1.1 Land Use Guide: IND Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 3 TAXPIN: 106806004001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.5 Property Owner: PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $78.900.00 Net Tax: $1,209.54 144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $78,900.00 Total Tax: $1,209.54 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-4 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Geroge Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 4 TAXPIN: 106806005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.5 Property Owner. PATRICIA L VOGELPOHL Assessed Land Value: $108,700.00 Net Tax: $1,669.68 144 CHAPARRAL DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $108,700.00 Total Tax: $1,669.68 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124-9720 Last Sale Date (nlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-4 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 5 TAXPIN: 101860001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 8.2 Property Owner. SILVER BELL BUSINESS CENTER INC Assessed Land Value: $628,000.00 Net Tax: $149,457.06 %ELLIOT J LARSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $3,470,000.00 Special Assessment $12,565.28 PO BOX 100 Total Assessed Value: 54,098,000.00 Total Tax: $162,022.34 WARROAD MN 56763-0100 Last Sale Date (myr): 11 1991 Sale Value: $1,950,000.00 Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1985 Building Type: WHSE,BUSCR Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 100,340.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 32 APPENDIX C-2 i L MAP ID: 6 TAXPIN: 100190001102 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 4.9 Property Owner. BERNARD J MULCAHYCO INC Assessed Land Value: 5145,000.00 Net Tax: $3,757.40 2700 BLUE WATER ROAD STE 1DO Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 58.20316 Total Assessed Value: $145,000.00 Total Tax: $11,960.56 FAGAN MN 55121-1400 Last Sale Date (w#*): 0 0 Sao Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 7 TAXPN: 107550001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 6.0 Property Owner. TESSERACT OF EAGAN INC Assessed Land Value: 5769,800.00 Net Tax: $134,311.00 7760 FRANCE AVE S STE 1430 Assessed Bldg. Value: $2,720,200.00 Special Assessment 5867.34 Total Assessed Value: $3,490,000.00 Total Tax: 5735.178.34 BLOOMINGTON MN 55435 Last Sao Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale value: $0.00 Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1988 Building Type: CLASSROOM Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 35,800.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 10 MAP ID: 8 TAXPN: 107550001000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 6.1 Property Owner: SILL PROPERTIES Assessed Land Value: 5503,600.00 Net Tax: $17,164.14 5633 HWY 13 W Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $503,600.00 Total Tax: $17,164.14 SAVAGE MN 55378-1215 Last Sale Date (rnlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: *MAP ID: 9 TAXPN: 100190002025 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 6.9 Property Owner. R L BERNSTEIN Assessed Land Value: $295,800.00 Net Tax: 124,069.06 % WM G SMALL Assessed Bldg. Value: $368,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00 9714 OLD KATY RD Total Assessed Value: $664,600.00 Total Tax: $24,069.06 HOUSTON TX 77055.6209 Last Sale Date (wyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1963 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finished Bldg. Sq. tt : 22,240.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 'MAP ID: 11 TAXPN: 100190003025 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): - 7.6 Property Owner. CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $153,50D.00 Net Tax: $0.00 3795 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special AssessmeM $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $153,500.00 Total Tax: $0.00 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1318 Last Sale Date (n yr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: 1-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. fl.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 15 TAXPN: 101370007001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.6 Property Owner. RANDALL J 6 SANDRA K OUAM Assessed Land Value: $82,100.00 NOT= $7,140.52 3925 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $143,900.00 Spacial Assessment 50.00 Total Assessed Value: 5226,000.00 Total Tax: $7,140.52 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1415 Last Sala Data (wd r): 6 1992 Sale Value: 5205.000.00 Zoning: GB Lard Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1977 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 7,080.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX ~ j C-3 MAP ID: 16 TAXPIN: 101370006001 Acres (total acres Of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner: KELLY 8 CONNIE PLOURDE Assessed Land Value: $60,800.00 Net Tax: 55,672.36 6100 AUTO CLUB RD UNIT 208 Assessed Bldg. Value: $127,200.00 Spacial Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $188,000.00 Tool Tax: $5,672.36 BLOOMINGTON MN 55438.2488 Last Sale Data (Myr): 12 1992 Sale Value: $88,914.00 Zoning: G8 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft- 3,642.0 Garage Sq. ft' 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 17 TAXPIN: 101370005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.8 Property Owner. JAMAL D ANSARI Assessed Land Value: $103,700.00 Net Tax: 14,652.60 3945 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $58,800.00 Special Assessment $178.94 Total Assessed Value: $162,500.00 Total Tax: $4,831.54 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1415 Last Sala Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale value: $0.00 Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA Bldg, Data: Year Built: 1976 Building Type: RESTAURANT Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 3,042.0 Garage Sq. tt: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 18 TAXPIN: 101370004001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9 Property Owner: SLED HEAD INC CIODBA LARSONS AUTOMOTI Assessed Lend Value: $113,200.00 Net Tax: $4,816.02 3955 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,800.00 SPecial Assessment $196.98 Total Assessed Value: $165,000.00 Toth lax: $5.013.00 EAGAN MN 55122-1411 Last Salo Date (rNyr): 11 1994 Sale Value: $178,108.00 Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1981 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finished Bldg. Sq. R.: 2,880.0 Garage Sq. fl: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 19 TAXPIN: 101370003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9 Property Owner: CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: $120,100.00 Net Tax: $0.00 3830 PILOT KNOB ROAD Assessed Bldg. Value: 50.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $120,100.00 Total Tax: $O.00 EAGAN MN 55122-1810 Last Sale Date (rrW): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 20 TAXPIN: 101370002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.9 Property Owner: STRATFORD HOLDINGLLC Assessed Land Value: $121,600.00 Net Tax: $8,690.60 %THE LANGFAN CO Assessed Bldg. Value: $140,400.00 Special Assessment 5210.32 6 45TH ST E Total Assessed Value: 5262,000.00 Total Tax: $8,900.92 NEW YORK NY 10017.2414 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: GS Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1976 Building Type: RETAIL STR Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 4,500.0 Garage Sq. it: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 21 TAXPIN: 101370001001 Acres (total acres Of Tax Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner: SUPERIOR COLLISION & PAINT INC Assessed Land Value: $133,000.00 Nat Tax: $14,03142 3985 CEDARVIEW DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 5274,DDO0 00 Special Assessmerd $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $407,000.00 Total Tax: $14,033.42 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1411 Last Sale Date (myr): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Lard Use Guido: SA Bldg. Data: Year Buill: 1988 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finished Bldg. Sq. 11.: 12,162.0 Garage Sq. It. 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX C-4 MAP ID: 22 TAXPN: 100190001003 Acne (lotel scrss of Tax Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner. U-HAUL REAL ESTATE CO Assessed Land Value: 588,800.00 Net Tax: 53,504.72 PO BOX 29046 Assessed Bldg. Value: $29,200.00 Special Assessment $162.20 Total Assessed Value: 5118,000.00 Total Tax: $3,666.92 PHOENIX AZ 85038-9046 Last Sale Data (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land the Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1965 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finished Bldg. Sq. n: 1,534.0 Garage Sq. fl: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 25 TAXPN: 101670204108 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel)- 0.7 Property Owner: JOSEPH L d ELISE D STEINFELD Assessed Land Value: $41,600.00 Net Tax: $4,865.82 % ASK FINANCIAL Assessed Bldg. Value: $127,000.00 Special Assessment $0.00 4040 NICOLS RD Total Assessed Value: $168,600.00 ToUl Tax: 54,865.82 EAGAN MN 55122-1906 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 5 1998 Sale Value: $154,000.00 Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1978 BuBding Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. n : 3,912.D Garage Sq. h: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 26 TAXPN: 101670203108 Acres (total acres of Tax parcel): 0.3 Property Owner: LAWRENCE W 8 DONEENE WENZEL Assessed Land Value: 520,400.00 Net Tax: 5330.78 3600 KENNEBEE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $20,400.00 Total Tax: $330.78 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SO.DO Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. 11: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 27 TAXPN: 101670202008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3 Property Owner: LAWRENCE W A DONEENE WENZEL Assessed Land Value: $36.900.00 Net Tax: $564.42 3600 KENNEBEE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $36.900.00 Total Tax: $564.42 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (rrdyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Sutra: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. h.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 28 TAXPN: 101670201008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3 Property Owner: DENNIS D & FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Land Value: 536,900.00 Net Tax: $564.42 50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 50.00 Total Assessed Value: $36,900.00 Total Tax: $564.42 MINNEAPOLIS MN 554031145 Last Sale Date (wyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: LB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. n: Garage Sq. R: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 29 TAXPN: 100190010008 Acre (total acres 01 Tax Paree9: 0.7 Property Owner. WING K SETO Assessed Land Value: $93.500.00 Not Tax: $5.272.32 4730 OAK CLIFF OR Assessed Bldg. Value: $80,200.00 Special Assessment $516.60 Total Assessed Value: $173,700.00 Total Tax: 55,78812 EAGAN MN 55122.3301 Last Sale Date 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1966 Building Type: RESTAURANT Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2.534.0 Garage Sq. h: 0 BEDS 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX 133 C-5 MAP ID: 30 TAXPM: 1 01 352001 000 Acme (total acres of Tax Parcel): 3.2 Property Owner. DENNIS D& FRANCES A GONYEA Assessed Land Value: =57,800.00 Net Tax: 51,706.04 50 GROVELAND TERR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Spacial Assessmsrd $820.86 Total Assessed Value: $57,800.00 Total Tax: 52,526.90 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403.1145 Last Soh Date (rWyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Veer Bulth Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 31 TAXPM. 101352001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner: TIMOTHY J BEEBE Assessed Land Value: $50,300.00 Net Tax: $1,510.24 1671 E OLD SHAKOPEE RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $600.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $50,900.00 Total Tax: 51,510.24 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425.2444 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 12 1987 Sale Value: $111,750.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA MAP ID: 36 TAXPIN: 100190001111 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 9.6 Property Owner. LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Value: $419,900.00 Net Tax: $14,575.72 1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY APT 106 Assessed Bldg. Value: 548,200.00 Special Assessment 51,882.44 Total Assessed Value: $468,100.00 TotslTex: $16,458.16 SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3667 Last Sale Data (rrdW): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1900 BulldingType: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1228.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 2 BATH: 1 Bldg. Data: Yew Suitt: 1985 Building Type; WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. n.: 30,000.0 Garage Sq.11 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 37 TAXPNI: 100190004112 Acres (total was of Tax Parcel): 0.6 Property Owner. JOGS ELECTRIC CO Assessed Land Value: 537,200.00 Net Tax: $1.815.34 3980 BEAUDRUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 527,000.00 Special AssesameM $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $64200.00 Total Tax: $1,815.34 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (nVVT): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1960 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 2,012.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 38 TAXPW: 100190004212 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner: JOHN R LACHENMAYER Assessed Land Value: $60,800.00 Net Tax: $1,015.30 3986 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 5108.400.00 Special Assessment $180.84 Total Assessed Value: 5169,200.00 Total Tax: $1,196.14 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 9 1992 Sale Value: $87,500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1960 Building Type: S FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,049.0 Garage Sq. ft; 0 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 MAP ID: 39 TAXPIN: 100190001211 Acres (total acres of Tex Parcel): 1.9 Property Owner: LEO MOGOL Assessed Land Value: $103.800.00 Net Tax: $4,250.18 1077 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY APT 106 Assessed Bldg. Value: $400.00 Special Assessment 5438.44 Total Assessed Value: $104.200.00 Total Tax: $4.688.62 SAINT PAUL MN 55118-3667 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sae Value: $0.00 Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. H.: 12,385.0 Garage Sq. ft: O BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 4,668.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 4,500.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1915 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 3,616.0 Garage S44. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 MAP ID: 40 TAXPIN: 100190001008 Acres (tool acres of Tax Pat Q: 1.6 Property Owner. SINCLAIR MARKETING INC Assessed Land Value: 5169,900.00 NOT= $5,966.72 550 E SOUTH TEMPLE Assessed Bldg. Value: $25,100.00 Special Assessment 52,188.74 PO BOX 30625 Total Assessed Value: 5195,000.00 Total Tax: $8.155.46 SALT LAKE CITY UT 84102-1005 Last Sets Date (mfyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1965 Building Type: SERVC STN Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,247.0 Garage Sq. M: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX C-7 MAP ID: 41 TAXPIN: 100190009009 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. JEFFREY SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $58,600.00 Net Tax: $3,698.12 1009 99TH ST Assessed Bldg. Value: $71,900.00 Special Assessment $122.42 Total Assessed Value: $130,500.00 Total Tax: 53,820.54 ROBERTS WI 54023.84D5 Last Sale Data (m/yr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00 Zoning: CSC Land ties Guide; SA Bldg. Data: Year But": 1966 Building Type: CARWASH Finished Bldg. Sq. IL: 2,562.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 0 MAP ID: 42 TAXPP4: 100190002008 Apes (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3 Property Owner: LARRY FRATTALONE Assessed Land Value: 530,000.00 Net Tax: $3,275.82 3527 LEXINGTON AVE N Assessed Bldg. Value: $85,800.00 Special Assessment $78.48 Total Assessed Value: $115.800.00 Total Tax: 53,354.30 ARDEN HILLS. MN 55126 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1965 Building Type: RETAIL STR Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 5,000.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 43 TAXPIN: 100190003008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner: GERALD HUSTON Assessed Land Value: $38.000.00 Net Tax: 52.049.66 608 OAKLAND DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $34,700.00 Special Assessment $99.40 Total Assessed Value: $72,700.00 Total Tax; $2,149.06 BURNSVILLE MN 55337-3604 Last Sale Date (Myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1967 Building Type: RETAIL STR Finished Bldg. Sq. H.: 3,346.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 44 TAXPIN: 100190007008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner: BTA INV Assessed Land Value: $75,300.00 Net Tax: 17,947.80 A JAMES COOPER Assessed Bldg. Value: 5172.000.00 Special Assessment $0.00 3999 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $247,300.00 Total Tax: $7.947.80 EAGAN MN 55122-1421 Last Sale Date (Myr): 4 1987 Sole Value: $200.000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1970 Building Type: SERVC GAR Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 6,494.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 45 TAXPIN: 100190004006 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner: ROCKY L RANCH Assessed Land Value: $35,600.00 Not Tax: $2.316.74 18901 JORDAN TRL Assessed Bldg. Value: $45,700.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $81,300.00 TotalTax: $2.316.74 LAKEVILLE MN 55D44-7776 Last Sale Date (Wyr): 8 1994 Sale Value: $67,500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1968 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,920.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 46 TAXM: 100190005008 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): D.3 Property Owner. JEFFREY D 5 SARAH J SCHENDEL Assessed Land Value: $24,800.00 Not Tax: $1,915.94 1009 99TH ST Assessed Bldg. Value: $42,300.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $67,100.00 Tool Tax: $1.915.94 ROBERTS WI 54023.8405 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 12 1989 Sale Value: $60,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Gutds: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1965 Building Type: LAUNDROMAT FiMshed Bldg. Sq, ft.: 1.520.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX c-g i t MAP ID: 47 TAXPIN: 10019MI1100a Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. JOSEPH R MILBAUER Assessed Land Value: 144,600.00 Not Tax: $5,497.10 3997 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 1138,800.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $183,400.00 Total Tax: $5,497.10 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1421 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 10.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide- SA Bldg. Data: Yaw Built: 1968 Building Type: RETAIL STR FiMahed Bldg. Sq. ff.: 4,000.0 Garage Sq. It- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 48 TAXPIN: 100190002007 Acres (total sc a of Tax Parcel): 0.8 Property Owner: STEVE J 8 JANE M MARTIN Assessed Land Value: $81,200.00 Net Tax: $8,581.12 920 HARRIET AVE Assessed Bldg. Value: $182,700.00 Special Assessment 1296.62 Total Assessed Value: 1263,900.00 Total Tax: $8,877.74 SAINT PAUL MN 55126-8061 Last Sale Date (My): 12 1990 Sale Value: $275,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1971 Building Type: DAYCARECTR Finished Bldg. Sq. R.: 3,480.0 Garage Sq. h: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 49 TAXPIN: 100190009006 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner. JOHN E a KATHLEEN LUNDEEN Assessed Land Value: 157,900.00 Net Tax: $5,905.62 8009 PENNSYLVANIA RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $140,100.00 Special Assessment $151.46 Total Assessed Value: $19B,000.D0 Total Tax: $6,057.08 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55438.1134 Last Sale Date (rntyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 9,130.0 Garage Sq. ti: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 4 MAP ID: 50 TAXPIN: 100190001107 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2 Property Owner: JOHN W FITZGERALD Assessed Land Value: $24,100.00 Net Tax: $4,823.20 3914 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 1149,900.00 Special Assessment $82.66 Total Assessed Value: $174,000.00 Total Tax: $4,905.86 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1403 Last Sale Date (rrJyr): 12 1994 Sale Value: $117,292.D0 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: 5,500.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH. 3 MAP ID: 51 TAXPIN: 100190005106 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 12.1 Property Owner: WAYZATA BAY CTR CO Assessed Land Value: $1,050200.00 Net Tax: $103,921.30 PO BOX 834 Assessed Bldg. Value: $1,637,600.00 Special Assessment $4,730.22 Total Assessed Value: 12,687,800.00 Total Tax: $108,651.52 NEW ULM MN 56073.0834 Last Sale Date (rnlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1965 Building Type: SHPCTR,COM Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 152,000.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH, 5 APPENDIX C-9 MAP ID: 52 TAXPIi: 100190001006 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 3.5 Property Owner. MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed Land Value: $276,800.00 Net Tax: $17.649.38 3900 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $220,200.00 Special Assessment $1,370.62 Total Assessed Value: $497,000.00 Total Tax: $19,020.00 EAGAN MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: s0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1963 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 13,811.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 4 TAXPIN: 100190001106 Acres (total stns of Tax Parcel): 3.5 Property Owner: MYERS REAL ESTATELLP Assessed Land Value: $12,000.00 Net Tax: $487.78 39W SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 50.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $12,000.00 Total Tax: $487.78 EAGAN MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (mtyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 53 TAXPIN: 100190007106 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): Property Owner. PAUL C BECKER Assessed Lend Value: $19,200.00 Net Tax: $1,185.74 3912 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $24,500.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $43,700.00 Total Tax: $1,185.74 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (mfyr): 2 1997 Sale Value: $36,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: 900.0 Garage Sq. fl: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 TAXPIN: 100190007206 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): Property Owner. PAUL BECKER Assessed Land Value: $23,200.00 Net Tsx: $1,408.38 3908 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 528,700.00 Special Assessment 539.24 Total Assessed Value: $51,900.00 Total Tax: $1,447.62 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (rtVyr): 12 1988 Selo Value: $82,500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1969 Building Type: OFC,MD/DTL Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,080.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 TAXPIN: 100190007306 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): Property Owner: LAWRENCE D 8 LESLIE HAUGEN Assessed Land Value: $14,400.00 Net Tax: $914.66 4096 HAUTE LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $19,300.00 Special Assessment $39.24 Total Assessed Value: $33,700.00 Total Tax: $953.90 EAGAN MN 55122-2914 Last Sale Date (Myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. tt.: 670.0 Garage Sq. tt: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 TAXPIN: 100190007406 CONDO Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): Property Owner. ALAN PAYMAR Assessed Land Value: $23,200.00 Net Tax: $1,625.10 3908 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 536,700.00 Special Assessment $39.24 Total Assessed Value: $59,900.00 Total Tax: $1,664.34 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1414 Last Sale Date (rtVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1969 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1.248.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 54 TAXPW: 101665012201 Apes (total acres of Tax Pat 1): 0.1 Property Owner. AMERICAN ACCOUNTS& ADVISORS INC Assessed Land Value: $12,300.00 Net Tax: $2,758.82 3904 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $72,700.00 Special Assessment 50.00 Total Assessed Value: $85,000.00 Total Tax: $2,758.82 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Lost Sale Date (Myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yen Built: 1976 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,400.0 Gangs Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX C-10 1 G MAP ID: 55 TAXPIN: 10168SO12301 Acres (total act of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Property Owner. AMERICAN ACCOUNTS& ADVISORS INC Assessed Land Value- $15,100.00 Nel Tax: $3.044.68 3904 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $92,400.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $107,500.00 Total Tax: 53,044.68 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Dale (myr): 9 1995 Sale Value: 599,500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1976 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. K.: 3,168.0 Garage Sq. It: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 56 TAXPIN: 101665003101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2 Property Owner. MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: 522,600.00 Net Tax: 54,277.10 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $128.400.00 Special Assessment $50.82 3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: 5151,000.00 Total Tax: $4,327.92 EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last Sale Date (rnyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yen Built: 1974 Building Type: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. fL. 6,336.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 57 TAXPIN: 101685009001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 01 Property Owner: MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Lend Value: $8,700.00 Net Tax: 5258.54 3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $19.66 Total Assessed Value: 58,700.00 Total Tax: $278.20 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (m/yr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 58 TAXPIN: 1016850011101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Property Owner: MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value: $12,000.00 Net Tax: 42.225.18 3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $66.000.00 Special Assessment 427.10 Total Assessed Value: 478,000.00 Total Tax: 42,252.28 EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last Sale Dale (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SO.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year built: 1976 BuildingType: OFFICE Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,432.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 59 TAXPIN: 101685006201 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.0 Property Owner. MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value: $4,300.00 Net Tax: 4127.46 390D CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 49.82 Total Assessed Value: 44,300.00 Total Tax: 4137.28 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yen Built. Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 60 TAXPIN: 101685004001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Property Owner: MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed LOW Value: $8,300.00 Net Tax: 5338.76 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessmer $18.74 3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $8,300.00 Total Tax: 5357.52 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Data (myr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Btlliding Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: Garage Sq. k: BEDS: BATH: APPENDIX 13,09 C-11 MAP ID: 61 TAXPN: 101665005001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 01 Property Owner: MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: $8,700.00 Net Tax: 5355.66 PARRANTO FAM TST %A4ARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $19.60 3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $8,700.00 Total Tax: 5375.26 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sale Data (rnyr): 0 0 Sale Value: Sam Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: Geroge Sq. 4: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 62 TAXPN: 101665006001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2 Property Owner. MARK S TSTE PARRANTO Assessed Land Value: $9,000.00 Net Tax: $300.84 PARRANTO FAM TST %MARK Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessmant $0.00 3914 CEDARVALE DR Total Assessed Value: $9,000.00 Total Tax: 5300.84 EAGAN MN 55122.1410 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 63 TAXPIN: 101690103000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.1 Property Owner. MINNESOTAS CREDITUNION Assessed Land Value: $3,000.00 Not Tax: $122.06 3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $3.000.00 Total Tax: $122.06 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg, Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Geroge Sq. H: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 64 TAXPN: 101690104000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.3 Property Owner: MINNESOTAS CREDITUNION Assessed Land Value: $6,300.00 Net Tax: 5255.90 3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $6,300.00 Total Tax: $255.90 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Salo Date (rtVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq, ti.: Geroge Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 65 TAXPN: 101690101001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner. MINNESOTAS CRE04TUNION Assessed Land Value: $72,800.00 Net Tax: $10,815.70 3880 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $248,100.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $320,900.00 Total Tax: $10,815.70 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Dale jnvVr): 4 1995 Sale Value: $274,204.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Suitt: 1975 Building Type: BANK Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 9.720.0 Garage Sq. ft-- 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 66 TAXPN: 103660001001 Acres (total acres of rat Parcel): 1.3 Property Owner. JENSEN JENSEN 6 JENSEN PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $116,500.00 Not Tax: $26,385.88 3840 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed SMg. Value: $598.500.00 Special Assessment 5395.50 Total Assessed Value: $715,000.00 Total Tax: $26.781.38 EAGAN MN 55122-1412 last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value, $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1974 Building Type: RESTAURANT Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 7,995.0 Geroge Sq. R: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 APPENDIX D c-12 MAP ID: 67 TAXPIN: 101660101001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 3.5 Property Owner. CEDARVALE BOWL INC Assessed Land Value: 5268,700.00 Net Tax: $30,455.46 3883 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $531,300.00 Special Assessment $802.80 Total Assessed Value: $800,000.00 Total Tax: $31,258.26 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Salo Date (rntyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1979 Building Type: BWLNGALLEY Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: 32,661.0 Garage Sq n: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 4 MAP ID: 68 TAXPMI: 101690101000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.2 Property Owner. ANA CORPORATION Assessed Lad Value: $3.300.00 Net Tax: $97.38 3830 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $3,300.00 Total Tax: $97.38 EAGAN MN 55122.1412 Last Sale Date (nwyr): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Edda: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: Garage Sq. R: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 69 TAXPIN: 101690102001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.3 Property Owner: IMAD ANSARI Assessed Land Value: $98,700.00 Net Tax: $5,832.22 4365 CAPRICORN CT Assessed Bldg. Value: $94,300.00 Special Assessment $519.90 Total Assessed Value: 5193.000.00 Total Tsx: 56,352.12 EAGAN MN 551231850 Last Salo Data (tNyr): 7 1993 Sale Value: $150.000.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1978 Building Type: CONV STORE Finished Bldg. Sq. R.: 3,045.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 70 TAXPIN: 100190005004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner: JR MEGA INC Assessed Land Value: $87,200.00 Net Tax: $11,816.50 % GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: $263,000.00 Special Asseasment $0.00 2908 HAYES DRIVE Total Assessed Value: $350,200.00 Total Tax: $11.816.50 BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last Sale Date 10 1999 Sale Value: 5335.500.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 23,760.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 71 TAXPIN: 100190006004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.8 Property Owner: JR MEGA INC Assessed Land Value: $67,900.00 Net Tax: $2,837.22 % GERALD SCHILTZ Assessed Bldg. Value: $1,900.00 Special Assessment 50.00 2908 HAYES DRIVE Total Assessed Value: $69,800.00 Total Tax: $2.837.22 BURNSVILLE MN 55337 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 72 'TAXPIN: 100190002004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.1 Property Owner. C B 6 R ENT Assessed Land Value: $92,400.00 Net Tax: $8,537.56 3810 SIBLEY MEM HWY Assessed Bldg. Value: 5116,600.00 Special Assessment 50.00 Total Assessed Value: 5209,000.00 Total Tax: $8,537.56 SAINT PAUL MN 55122.1412 Last Sale Data 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1964 Building Type: WHSE.STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 9,554.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 5 APPENDIX / C-13 MAP ID: 73 TAXPIN: 100190003004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 1.0 Property Owner: C B 8 R ENT Assessed Land Value: $85,800.00 Net Tax: $11,277.10 3835 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: 5231,200.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $317,000.00 Total Tax: $11277.10 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1402 Last Sale Date (rtVyr): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Sift. Sq. fL: 15,699.0 Garage Sq. 1t: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 3 MAP ID: 74 TAXPIN: 100190001004 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.7 Property Owner: HANNA & KATHLEEN NASR Assessed Lend Value: $103,100.00 Net Tax: 54,659.54 % EXPRESS DONUTS Assessed Bldg. Value: $51,900.00 Special Assessment S44S.84 3808 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWY Total Assessed Value: 5155,000.00 Total Tax: 55,105.38 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1412 Last Selo Date (m/yr): 6 1988 Sale Value: $175,000.00 Zoning: CSC Land the Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1972 Building Type: RESTAURANT Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,453.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 2 MAP ID: 80 TAXPW: 104445001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner: CITY OF EAGAN Assessed Land Value: 529,400.00 Net Tax: $1,324.56 3830 PILOT KNOB RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $113,000.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $142.400.00 Total Tax: $1,324.56 EAGAN MN 55122 Last Sale Date (myr): 11 2000 Salo Value: 5145.000.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yea. Built: 1956 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,000.0 Garage Sq. h: 0 BEDS: 3 BATH: 135 MAP ID: 81 TAXPIN: 104445002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner: ALBERT 8 ALMA BIRR Assessed Land Value. $32,100.00 Net Tax: $1,289.30 1930 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $95,900.00 Special Assessment 50.00 Total Assessed Value: $128,000.00 Total Tex: $1,289.30 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last Sale Date (rNyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1962 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. It.: 1,248.0 Garage Sq. ft: 1216 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 82 TAXPIN: 104445003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner: JEFFREY G 8 MARY M HALL Assessed Land Value: 533,800.00 Net Tax: $1.159.40 1940 SILVER BELL RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $89,300.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: 5123,100.00 Total Tax: $1.159.40 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1101 Last Sale Date (YvV r): 5 1987 Salo Value: $70.000.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1952 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. tL: 1,428.0 Garage Sq. ft: 672 BEDS: 4 BATH: 1 MAP ID: 83 TAXPIN: 10444SM001 Acres (total acres al Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. THOMAS G 8 JULIE A WOODNER Assessed Land Vaitle: 533,800.00 Net Tax: $1,526.42 3816 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $113,000.00 SpacialAssesinrem 5159.02 Total Assessed Value: $146,800.00 Total Tax: $1,685.44 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1401 Last Selo Date (Wyr): 4 1991 Sale Value: $85,000.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1958 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 1.184.0 Garage Sq tt: 0 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 APPENDIX c-14 r MAP ID: 84 TAXPIN: 104445006101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. TONG YIA f: LIA VANG LOR Assessed Land Value: $32,100.00 Net Tau: $1,156.72 3822 BEAU D RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $84,500.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $116,600.00 Total Tax: $1.156.72 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1401 last SW Daft (Myr): 8 1990 Sale Value: $80,900.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1956 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq.1t.: 1,661.0 Garage Sq. ft: 464 BEDS: 3 BATH: 125 MAP ID: 85 TAXPW: 104445006201 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. ALBERT E HORROCKS Assessed Land Value: $30.500.00 Net Tax: 5464.74 PO BOX 157 Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment SO.DO Total Assessed Value: $30,500.00 Total Tax: $464.74 CLARKS GROVE MN 56016-0157 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: 50.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage 54 n: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 86 TAXPIN: 104445009001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. DORIS R TSTE DAHUNE Assessed Land Value: $33,800.00 Net Tax: 51,95116 3830 ALDER LN Assessed Bldg. Value: $135.700.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $169,500.00 Total Tax: $1,951.16 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1501 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1961 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 2,484.0 Garage Sq. ft: 440 BEDS, 4 BATH: 225 MAP ID: 87 TAXPIN: 104445010101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.5 Property Owner. REM METRO SERVICES INC Assessed Land Value: $35,600.00 Net Tax: $2,506.36 6921 YORK AVE S Assessed Bldg. Value: $130,500.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $166,100.00 Total Tax: $2.506.36 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55435-2587 Lost Sale Date (inlyr): 7 1993 Sale Value: $120,000.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1980 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,624.0 Garage Sq. ft: 962 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.75 MAP ID: 88 TAXPIN: 104730001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner. DAKOTA COUNTY HRA Assessed Land Value: 524,000.00 Net Tax: $0.00 2496145TH ST W Assessed Bldg. Value: $160,200.DO Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $184.200.00 Total Tax: $0.00 ROSEMOUNT MN 55068-4947 Last Sale Data (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: SO.DO Zoning: R-2 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Date: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,136.0 Garage Sq. ft: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,136.0 Garage Sq. fl: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 89 TAXPIN: 104730002001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.4 Property Owner. JAMES A HUEY Assessed Land Value: $40,600.00 Net Tax: $2,581.90 1993 GOLD TRAIL Assessed Bldg. Value: $154,800.00 SpecialAssessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $195,400.00 Total Tex: $2,581.90 EAGAN MN 55122-1589 Last Salo Date (wdW): 6 1999 Sala Value: $135,000.00 Zoning: R-2 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 1,172.0 Garage Sq. ft: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 Bldg. Data: Yew Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,172.0 Gangs Sq. et: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 APPENDIX c-15 MAP ID: 90 TAXPM: 104730003001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.6 Property Owner. RONALD D CASPER Assessed Land Value: $40,600.00 Net Tax: $1,671.82 1989 GOLD TR Assessed Bldg. Value: $150,600.00 Special Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: $191,200.OD Total Tax: $1,671.82 EAGAN MN 55122.1589 Last Sale Date (►Nyr): 6 1998 Sale Value: $148,000.00 Zoning: R-2 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Building Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. fu 1,156.0 Garage Sq. ft: 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1977 Raiding Type: TWIN HOME Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: 1,156.0 Garage Sq. fL- 264 BEDS: 3 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 92 TAXPM: 104400001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Portal): 0.8 Property Owner: DARYL J 8 NORI A HART Assessed Land Value: $54,9DO.OD Net Tax: $1,612.42 3850 BEAU DE RUE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $97,900.00 Spacial Assessment $0.00 Total Assessed Value: 5152,800.00 Total Tax: $1,612.42 SAINT PAUL MN 55122 Last Sale Date (Myr): 10 1994 Sale Value: $100.000.00 Zoning: R-1 Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1934 Building Type: S.FAM.RES Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 1,440.0 Garage Sq. ft: 938 BEDS: 1 BATH: 1.5 MAP ID: 93 TAXPIN: 108470001000 Acres (total acres of Tax Pareel): 1.0 Property Owner: TERRY E TSTE STOVER Assessed Land Value: $47,600.00 Net Tax: $1,243.46 3906 RAHN RD Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $623.22 Total Assessed Value: $47,600.00 Total Tax: $1,866.68 SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1523 Last Sale Date (mlyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: A Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Bulft: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 95 TAXPM: 100170002054 Acres (total acres of Tax Portal): 1.2 Property Owner: FRANCHISE REALTY INT CORP Assessed Land Value: S189,4DO.DO Net Tax: $16,419.34 THOMAS P BUTLER Assessed Bldg. Value: $275,600.00 Special Assessment $0.00 7735 GIBRALTAR TEAR Total Assessed Value: $465,DDO.00 Total Tax: $16,419.34 APPLE VALLEY MN 55124.6124 Last Sale Date (nVyr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: GB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1974 Building Type: REST FSTFD Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 4.564.0 Garage Sq. 1t: 0 BEDS: D BATH: 2 MAP ID: 96 TAXPIN: 106810001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Pral): 6.5 Property Owner. CHASKA INV LTD PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: 5562,000.00 Net Tax: $37,362.96 7301 OHMS LANE Assessed Bldg. Value: $443,000.00 Special Assessment 50.00 SUITE 390 Total Assessed Value: $1,005,000.00 Total Tax: $37,362.96 EDINA MN 55439.2351 Last Sale Date (mry►): 0 0 S♦le Value: $0.00 Zoning: NB Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1979 Building Type: SHPCTR,NBH Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: 39,920.0 Garage Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: 13 MAP ID: 97 TAXPM: 101605011101 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.0 Property Owner. MARSHA H ELLINGSON Assessed Land Value: $1,100.00 Nat Tax: $32.28 3900 CEDARVALE DR Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment 52.66 Total Assessed Value: $1,100.00 Total Tax: $34.94 EAGAN MN 55122-1410 Last Sala Date (mryr): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: CSC Lend Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: YewBulK: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq. ft.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: APPENDIX C-16 MAP ID: 98 TAXPIN: 106820001000 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 0.0 Property Owner: DUKE REALTY LTD PTNSHP Assessed Land Value: $100.00 NOT= $3.62 % ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $0.00 Special Assessment $0.00 1550 UTICA AVE S. SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $100.00 Total Tax: $3.62 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Last Sale Date (W r): 0 0 Salo Value: $0.00 Zoning: PD Land Use Guide: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: Building Type: Finished Bldg. Sq.1t.: Garage Sq. ft: BEDS: BATH: MAP ID: 99 TAXPW: 106820001001 Acres (total acres of Tax Parcel): 16.6 Property Owner: DUKE REALTY LTD PTNSHP AssesW Land Value: $1265,300.00 Net Tax: 5306,187.20 % ROBERT H JOHNSON Assessed Bldg. Value: $6,639,700.00 Special Asseumenl $12,074.84 1550 UTICA AVE S SUITE 120 Total Assessed Value: $7,905,000.00 Total Tax: $318,262.04 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Last Salo Date (nV r): 0 0 Sale Value: $0.00 Zoning: PD Land Use Gulds: SA Bldg. Data: Year Built: 1998 Building Type: WHSE,STRG Finished Bldg. Sq. fL: 235,000.0 Geroge Sq. ft: 0 BEDS: 0 BATH: e 'The City has proposed that parcel numbers 100190002025 (Map ID 9) and 100190003025 (Map ID 11) be combined prior to certification of the District, no later than June 30, 2002. If the lot combination does not take place prior to that date, parcel number 100190003025 will be eliminated from the District. Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Totals Total Area (acres.): 181.1 Total Finished Bldg. 910,984.00 APPENDIX ~ C-17 Cedar Grove Redevelopment Area Parcels or Portions of Parcels in Right-of-way Taxpin Right-of-way Owner name Parcel Acreage 100190001025 SHELDON & MARY RAMNARINE 0.066 100190001102 BERNARD J MULCAHYCO INC 0.585 100190002004 C B & R ENT 0.052 100190003004 C B & R ENT 0.283 100190006004 JR MEGA INC 0.121 100190001106 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.028 100190001006 MYERS REAL ESTATELLP 0.296 100190002009 CITY OF EAGAN 0.219 100190002026 STATE OF MN 3.365 100190001426 STATE OF MN 1.221 100190005106 WAYZATA BAY CTR CO 0.645 100190001226 CITY OF EAGAN 1.096 100190001111 LEO MOGOL 0.332 100190001008 SINCLAIR MARKETING INC 0.131 100190001211 LEO MOGOL 0.114 100190002007 STEVE J & JANE M MARTIN 0.123 100190004008 ROCKY L RANCH 0.064 100190005008 JEFFREY D & SARAH J SCHENDEL 0.045 100190001107 JOHN W FITZGERALD 0.078 100190004112 JOOS ELECTRIC CO 0.119 100190008008 JOSEPH R MILBAUER 0.449 100190008006 JOHN E & KATHLEEN LUNDEEN 0.238 100190004212 JOHN R LACHENMAYER 0.065 100190003012 HANSEN METCALF ENT 0.091 100190002012 GORDON & ALICE KOPACEK 0.098 100190007008 BTA INV 0.39 100190002027 STATE OF MN 1.303 100190009008 JEFFREY SCHENDEL 0.182 100190010008 WING K SETO 0.673 100190001027 STATE OF MN 1.46 APPENDIX ~ c-18 I 4 APPENDIX D ESTIMATED CASH FLOW FOR THE DISTRICT APPENDIX D-1 6/16/01 Pogo 1 of 1 BASIC ASSUMPTIONS PLEASE READ ALL ASSUMPTIONS District: New Redevelopment District Inflation Rate 0.0000% Pay As You Go Revenue Note Rate 8.501/6 Fiscal Disp. Contribution Ratio WA Pay 2001 Pooling Assumption 25.00% Assumes First Tax Increment 2004 Assumes Last Tax Increment 2029 Years of Tax Increment 26 Present Value Date 02-01.2002 Tax Extension Rate 0.965780 After Ed Adj. Area Wide Rate WA Pay 2001 Amount of increment will very depending upon market value, tax rates, cis" rates, construction schedule, and inflation on market value. Inflation on tax rates cannot be captured. FROZEN TAX CAPACITY Land Market Building Market Total Market Class Base Tax PID Value Value Value Rate Capacity Office & Retail Project 10,841,600 16,308,400 27,150.000 1.50%-2.00% 604,394 Housing Project 1,018.700 424,100 1,442,800 1.00% 14,428 TOTAL 11,860,300 16.732.500 28,592,800 618,822 PROJECT VALUE INFORMATION Tax Capacity Total Phase Development Sq. Ft. - Market Value Minus Tax Capacity Tax Market Type Rooms Sq. Ft. - Room Fis, Dis. Rate Value Payable 1 Office Showroom 300,000 585.00 439,250 439,250 1.50%-2.00% 22,000,000 2004 1 Retail 50,000 $90.00 89,250 89,250 1.50%-2.00% 4,500,000 2004 1 Aptartments 200 $65,000.00 162,500 162,500 125% 13.000.000 2004 1 Hotel 200 $100,000.00 399,250 399,250 1.50%-2.00% 20.000.000 2004 1 Aptartments 300 $65,000.00 243,750 243,750 1.25% 19,500,000 2004 1 Rental Townhom 70 $65,000.00 56,875 56,875 1.25% 4,550,000 2004 1 Retail 50,000 $90.00 89,250 89.250 1.25% 4,500,000 2004 1 Aptartments 750 565,000.00 609.375 609,375 125% 48,750,000 2004 1 Houses 36 $200,000.00 72,000 72.000 1.00% 7,200,000 2004 1 Houses 24 5225,000.00 54,000 54,000 1.00% 5,400,000 2004 2 Houses 80 5225,000.00 180,000 180,000 1.00% 18,000,000 2005 2 Houses 32 $225,000.00 72,000 72,000 1.00% 7200,000 2005 • 2 Retail 20,000 $90.00 35,250 35,250 0.0125 1,800,000 2005 3 Houses 72 $250,000.00 180,000 180,000 1.00•/. 18,000,000 2006 3 Houses 32 5275,000.00 88,000 88,000 1.00% 8,800,000 2006 3 Office 600,000 $100.00 145,250 145,250 1.25% 7,300,000 2006 TOTAL 2,916,000 2,916,000 210,500,000 PLAN-3.xis I 6/16/01 ►lqe 1 xd 1 TAX INCREMENT CASH FLOW Begenig Period Amual Pmod Captured Sa Annual Slue A&m POOR rq Sem -Anrenl Erdiv Base Tax Tax Tax Cowity Grose Aod. Par wd ParTom parr wd No Period Ym ABh. Yr. CRPdty Cc-macity ifxxen-d 0.25% 10.00% 1500% In 17-6 4Ah. Yr. 0.0 1-Fab 2002 616,822 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1-Aug 2002 0.0 1-Aug 2002 616,922 618,822 0 0 0 0 O 0 0.0 1-Feb 200.3 0.0 1-Feb 2003 618,822 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1-Aug 2003 O.0 1-Aug 2003 618,622 618.822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1-Feb 2004 0.0 1-Fab 2004 618,922 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 1-Aug 2004 0.5 1-Aug 2004 616,622 618,822 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1-Fab 2005 1.0 1-Fab 2005 616.622 616.922 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.5 1-Aug 2005 1S 1-Aug 2005 618,822 618.822 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 1-Fab 2006 2.0 1-Feb 2006 616,822 2215,500 1,596,979 771,020 (1,928) (26.909) (115.364) 576,819 2.5 1-Aug 2006 2.5 1-Aug 2006 619,822 2215,500 1,506.679 771,020 (1,928) (16,909) (115,364) 576.819 3.0 1-Fab 2007 3.0 1-Feb 2007 618,822 2.502.750 1.863.929 909.730 (2274) (90.746) (136.118) 680,592 35 I-Aug 2007 3.5 1-Aug 2007 618,822 2.502,750 1,1183.929 909.730 (2.274) (90,746) (136.118) 680.592 4.0 1-Fab 2006 4.0 1-F b 2006 618,922 2.016,000 2297,179 1,109285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 629,983 4.5 1-Aug 2008 4.5 1-Aug 2008 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109.285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 629.893 5.0 1-Fab 2009 5.0 1-Feb 2009 618,022 2,916,000 2,207,179 1,ID9285 (2,773) (110.651) (165,977) 829.883 5.5 1-Aug 2009 55 1-Aug 2009 616,922 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 6.0 1-Fab 2010 6.0 1Ftl 2010 618,922 2.916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 6.5 1-Aug 2010 6.5 1-Aug 2010 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 7.0 1-Fab 2011 7.0 1-Feb 2011 618,822 2,916,000 2,207.179 1,108,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 7.5 1-Aug 2011 7.5 1-Aug 2011 616.822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 8.0 1-Fab 2012 8.0 1-Fab 2012 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 as 1-Aug 2012 8.5 1-Aug 2012 618.822 2,916,000 2,297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (11D,651) (165,977) 829,863 9.0 I-Feb 2013 90 1-Fab 2013 618.822 2,916.000 2.297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,893 9.5 1-Aug 2013 95 I-Aug 2013 618,822 2.916,000 2197,179 1.109.285 (2.773) (110.651) (165,977) 929.883 100 1-Fab 2014 10.0 1-Fab 2014 618,822 2,916,000 2.297.179 1,109,265 (2.773) (110,651) (165.977) 829,883 10.5 1-Aug 2014 105 1.Aug 2014 618,022 2,916,000 2.297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.077) 629.693 11.0 1-Feb 2015 11.0 1-Fab 2015 619.822 2.916.000 2.297,179 1,109,285 (2773) (110.651) (165,077) 829,683 11.5 1-Aug 2015 11.5 1-Aug 2015 618,922 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109.285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 629,663 12.0 1-Fab 2016 12.0 1-Feb 2016 618.822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1109.285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 12.5 1-Aug 2016 12.5 1-Aug 2016 610,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109.285 (2773) (110.651) (165,077) 829,833 13.0 1-Fab 2017 13.0 1-Feb 2017 618,822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 13.5 1-Aug 2017 13.5 I-Aug 2017 618.822 2.01.000 2197,179 1,109.285 (2773) (119651) (165,977) 829,883 14.0 1Fab 2018 14.0 1-Fab 2018 618.922 2,916,000 2,297.179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,683 14.5 I-Aug 2018 14.5 1-Aug 2018 618.822 2,916.000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,683 150 1-Feb 2019 15.0 1-Feb 2019 616.822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,893 15.5 1-Aug 2019 15.5 1-Aug 2019 618,822 2,916,000 2,297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829183 16.0 1-Fab 2020 16.0 1-Feb 2020 618.822 2,916,000 2.297.179 1.109.285 (2.773) (110.651) (165.977) 629083 16.5 1-Aug 2020 16.5 1-Aug 2020 618,022 2,916,ODD 2297.179 1,109.285 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 17.0 1-Feb 2021 17.0 1-F b 2021 SISA22 2.916.000 2297,170 1,109,286 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 17.5 I-Aug 2021 17.5 1-Aug 2021 610.822 2,916,000 2.97.179 1,109,265 (2.773) (110,651) (165,977) 629.683 18.0 1-Fob 2022 18.0 1-Fab 2022 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1.108285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 19.5 1-Aug 2022 18.5 1-Aug 2022 618,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,1183 190 1-Fab 2023 190 1-Fab 2023 618,822 2.916,000 2297,179 1,109.285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829683 19.5 1-Aug 2023 19.5 1-Aug 2023 618.622 2,916.000 2,297,179 1,109295 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,983 200 1-Feb 2024 20,0 1-Fab 2024 618.822 2,916,000 2197,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110.651) (165,977) 829,883 20.5 1-Aug 2024 20.5 1-" 2024 618.822 2.916.000 2.297.179 1,100,295 (2,773) (110.651) (165077) 829,883 21.0 1-Feb 2025 21.0 1-Fob 2025 618.822 2.916.000 2.297.179 1,109.95 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829683 21.5 1-Aug 2025 21.5 1-Aug 2025 616,822 2.916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110.661) (165,977) 829,883 22.0 1-Feb 2026 220 /Feb 2026 616,822 2,916,000 2297,179 1,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 22.5 I-Aug 2026 22.5 1-Aug 2026 618.822 2,916.000 2,297.179 1,100285 (2702 (110,851) (165077) 829,883 23.0 1-Fab 2027 23.0 1Fab 2027 618.822 2,916.OOO 2.97,179 1,100185 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 629,883 23.5 1-Aug 2027 23.5 1-Aug 2027 619,822 2,916,000 2297.179 11092115 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,863 24.0 IFeb 2023 24.0 I-Fab 2028 618.822 2.916.000 2297.179 1,100285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 24.5 1-Aug 2028 24.5 1-Aug 2026 619.022 2,915,000 2297,179 /,109,285 (2,773) (110,651) (165,977) 829,883 25.0 1-Feb 2029 25.0 1-Feb 2029 618.822 2,016,000 2297,179 1,109285 (2,773) (110,651) (165.977) 029,863 25.5 1-Aug 2029 255 1-A 2029 618.822 2,916.000 2297,179 1,100185 ,773 (110,651 (165,977 829,683 26.0 1-Fab 2030 TOTALS 52,170,020 130,425) 5203.959) (7.805,939) 39.029.696 PRESENT VALUE 15,468.323 11.572,239 PLAN-3.x4 APPENDIX E MINNESOTA BUSINESS ASSISTANCE FORM (MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT) APPENDIX E-t i G "'N`N NAVE S,p 2' 9 Trade 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Economic Development ■ The 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form (MBAF) is used to report each business subsidy and financial assistance agreement signed from January 1. 2000 through December 31, 2000 per Minn Stat. § 116J.993 to § 116J.995. Please use a separate form to report each agreement; for agreements signed from August 1, 1999 though December 31, 1999, use the 2000 MBAF; and for agreements signed from July 1, 1995 through July 31, 1999 use the 1999 MBAF. ■ The following government agencies must submit a 2001 MBAF even if an agreement was not signed during the period January 1. 2000 through December 31, 2000: 1) any local government/agency that signed a business subsidy agreement since January 1, 1996, or represents a population of more than 2,500; 2) all state government agencies. If the local/state government agency does not have any subsidies or assistance to report, please answer questions 1 through 13 and questions 33 and 34. ■ If a local or state government agency that is required to report has not done so by April 1, DIED will mail a warning. If it fails to report by June 1, it may not award any business subsidies until a report has been filed. ■ Questions? Call (651) 296-0580. Information on where to mail or fax your completed MBAF(s) is on page 4. Section 1 Information About Grantor I. Name of grantor (funding entity) 2. Name of person completing this form 3. Street address 4. City 5. ZIP code 6. County 7. Phone number 8. Fax number 9. E-mail address 10. Please indicate who in your organization should receive the 2002 MBAF if different from the person in Question 2. Name/Title Phone number Street address city ZIP code 11. Classification of grantor (Mark one. if grantor is entity 12. Has your organization held a public hearing on and created by govt agency, please indicate affiliation. For adopted criteria for awarding business subsidies in example, a city EDA would check "City government.) compliance with Minn. Stat. § 1 161.994? (Mark one.) 0 City government O Yes (Indicate hearing date - and attach criteria) 0 County government O No 0 Regional government 0 We held a public hearing but have not yet adopted O State government criteria (Indicate date of initial hearing - ) 0 Other (Please specify.) 0 Other (Please attach explanation.) 13. Has your organization signed any agreements to award a business subsidy or financial assistance from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2000 that is required to be reported under Minn. Stat. § 1161993 and § 116!.994? (Mark one.) D Yes (Complete the remainder ojthe jorm.) O No (Stop here. go to section S on page 4) Section 2 Information About Recipient 14. Name of business or organization 15. Address where business subsidy or financial assistance receiving subsidy or financial assistance will be used Street address City State ZIP code 16. Does the recipient have a parent corporation? (Mark one.) 0 Yes (Indicate name and address of parent corporation below. lfmore than one, indicate ultimate owner.) O No Name of parent corporation Street address City State ZIP code 2001 Minnesota Business Assislance Form Page 1 of4 Department of Trade and Economic Development L 17. Industry of recipient's facility (Mark one.). O Manufacturing O Services O Finance, Insurance, Real Estate O Retail Trade O Wholesale Trade O Construction O Other (please specify) 18. Did the recipient relocate as a result of signing this agreement? (Mark one.) O Yes (Indicate city and state of previous address and reason recipient did not complete this project at that address.) O No (Go to Question I9.) City/State of previous address Reason project not completed at previous address 19. Would the recipient have remained in previous location or relocated elsewhere if not awarded this business subsidy or financial assistance? (Mark one.) O Remained at previous location O Relocated to different Minnesota location O Relocated outside Minnesota Section 3 General Information About the Agreement 20. Total dollar value of business subsidy or financial 21. Date agreement signed (In addition to the agreement assistance (Please separate value by type in Questions 24 date, indicate any dates the agreement was amended.) and 2S.) 22. Benefit date (Indicate the date the recipient will benefit from the business subsidy or financial assistance. For example, indicate the date improvements were finished, equipment was placed into service, or the recipient occupied the property, whichever is earlier.) 23. Does the agreement provide a business subsidy or one of the four types of financial assistance (see Question 25) required to be reported? (Mark one.) O business subsidy O financial assistance 24. If the agreement provided a business subsidy, please 25. If the assistance was one of the four types of financial indicate the type(s) and total dollar value for each type. assistance, please indicate the type(s). O not applicable, agreement provided financial assistance O not applicable, agreement provided a business subsidy O loan (only principal) S O assistance for property polluted S 0 grant (i.e., forgivable loan) $ by contaminants O tax abatement S O assistance for renovating building $ O TIF or other tax reduction or deferral S stock or bringing it up to code, and O guarantee of payment S assistance provided for designated O contribution of property or infrastructure $ historic preservation districts, when O preferential use of governmental facilities $ 50% or less of total cost O land contribution s O assistance for pollution control or S O other (Speck subsidy type.) S abatement O assistance for a TIF soils condition district S 26. If the assistance included tax increment financing, please 27. Are any other grantors providing a business subsidy or indicate the type of TIF district? (Mark one.) financial assistance to the scum project? (Mark one.) O not applicable, assistance was not in the form of TIF O Yes (Specify each grantor and the value of their assistance below; attach an additional sheet if necessary) O redevelopment O renewal and renovation O No O soils condition O economic development Grantor(s) and value of the agreement(s): O mined underground space O hazardous substance subdistrict Grantor Value (S) Grantor Value (S) 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Page 2 of 4 Department of Trade and Economic Developmcni 1 I Section 4 Goals and Public Purpose Identified in the Agreement 28. Minn. Stat. § 1 16J.994 requires that business subsidy and financial assistance agreements state a public purpose. Which of the following public purposes were stated in the agreement? (Mark all that apply.) 0 Enhancing economic diversity 0 Increasing tax base (cannot be only purpose) 0 Creating high-quality job growth 0 Other (please specify) 0 Job retention 0 Stabilizing the community 29. Indicate whether the agreement included the following types of goals, and whether the recipient had attained those goals at the time of this report. (Fill in the boxes and attainment date(s) for each goal.) Goals Target attainment All goals established? dates (month & year) attained? A) Specific wage and job goals to be attained within 2 years O Yes 0 No 0 Yes 0 No B) Other job-creation and/or retention goals O Yes O No 0 Yes 0 No C) Other wage goals 0 Yes O No 0 Yes 0 No D) Other goals other than wage and job goals O Yes 0 No O Yes O No (Please attach descriptions of goals and progress toward attainment if not documented in Questions 30 and 31.) 30. For each of the following wage categories, indicate the job creation and/or retention goals stated in the agreement and the average hourly value of any employer-provided health insurance goals for those jobs. (Only indicate job creation goals in full-time equivalents if you are unable to separate goals by full- and part-time positions.) Full-time Part-time/ FTE (only If goals not Hourly Wage Job Seasonavremp. stated as FT/M Job Retention Hourly Value of (excluding benefits) Creation Job Creation Job Creation Health Insurance no hourly wage-level goal s less than 57.00 s 57.00 to 58.99 S 59.00 to $10.99 s Sl 1.00 to 512.99 s '13 00 to 51 4 99 S S 15.00 and higher s 31. For each of the following wage categories, indicate the number of actual jobs created and/or retained since the benefit date and the actual hourly value of any employer-provided health insurance for those jobs. (Only indicate job creation in full-time equivalents if you are unable to separate job creation into full- and part-time positions.) Full-time Part-time/ FTE onl if unable to Hourly Wage Job seasonavremp. separate FT/PT) Job Retention Hourly Value of (excluding benefits) Creation Jab Creation Job Creation Health Insurance less than 57.00 s 57.00 to 58.99 s $9.00 to 510.99 s S 11.00 to S 12.99 s S13.00 to S14.99 s S 15.00 and higher s 32. Has the recipient achieved all goals (see Questions 29, 30 and 31) and fulfilled all obligations stipulated in the agreement? (Mark one.) 0 Yes O No 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Page 3 of 4 Department of Trade and Economic Development IS,_3 Section 5 Recipients Failing to Fulfill Obligations (Do not complete this section if you completed it on another 1001 MBAF submitted to DTED.) 33. During the period January 1, 2000 through December 3t, 2000, did your organization have any recipients who failed to report as required by Minn. Stat. § 1161.993 and § 1161.994? (Mark one) O Yes (Indicate the name of each recipient Jailing to report and the value of subsidy or financial assistance awarded to that recipient. Attach additional pages ifnecessary.) O No Name of recipient Type of subsidy or assistance (See Questions 24 and 25.) Value of subsidy or assistance 34. Did your organization have any recipients who failed to achieve any goals or fulfill any other obligations under an agreement signed on or after January I, 2000, that were required to be fulfilled by the time of this report? (Mark one.) O Yes (Complete the remainder of this section) O No (Stop here and submit form to DTED 35-39. 39. Provide the following information for each recipient failing to fulfill goals or any other terms of an agreement that were to be attained by the time of reporting. (Attach additional pages ifnecessary) 35. Information on recipient and agreement: Name of recipient in default Type of subsidy or assistance Initial value of subsidy or assistance Street address of recipient City/ZIP code of recipient Outstanding value of subsidy or assistance 36. Rcason(s) for default (Mark all that apply.). O recipient ceased operation O recipient relocated to a different community O recipient was unable to fill vacant positions O other (Specify reason) 37. To date, has the recipient fui illed its repayment obligation? (Mark one.) O Yes O No, recipient has begun to repay the assistance. O No, recipient has not begun to repay the assistance. 38. Has the agreement been amended to extend the recipient's deadline for fulfilling its obligations? (Mark one.) 0 Yes O No 39. Describe the steps being taken to bring recipient into compliance or recoup the subsidy: Return your completed MBAF(s) by April 1.2001, to: 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development - AEO 500 Metro Square, 121 East 7' Place St. Paul, MN 55101-2146 Or fax to: (651) 215-3841 2001 Minnesota Business Assistance Form Page 4 of 4 Department of Trade and Economic Development f 1 r APPENDIX F REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT CITY OF EAGAN REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT ID CODE SUBSTANDARD SITE AREA COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE DETERMINATION (s.f.) % COVERAGE (s.f.) OUANTITY ID-01/02 N 723,054.72 77.51 560,412.32 723,054.72 ID-03 _ 608,746.48 12.1 73,858.20 - ID-04 _ 46,665.70 0.0 - - ID-05 _ 67,010.41 4.0 2,698.17 - ID-06 _ 64,583.75 1.7 1,092.03 - ID-07 _ 801.91 0.0 - - ID-08 N 358,870.83 84.2 302,170.42 358,870.83 ID-09 Y 282,554.56 61.1 172,635.64 282,554.56 ID-10 Y 54,103.42 68.8 37,210.49 54,103.42 ID-11/12 N 628,802.97 18.5 116,180.27 628,802.97 ID-14 Y 29,466.50 75.8 22,326.93 29,466.50 ID-15 _ 213,987.73 0.0 - ID-17 _ 265,048.62 0.0 - - ID-18 N 261,356.84 45.9 119,938.62 261,356.84 ID-20 Y 46.219.11 85.1 39.350.86 46,219.11 ID-21 N 43,602.19 100.0 43,602.19 43,602.19 ID-22 _ 42,886.34 53.3 22,843.42 42,886.34 ID-23 _ 8,326.69 100.0 8,326.69 8,326.69 ID-24 N 55,171.74 77.9 42,980.88 55,171.74 ID-25 _ 33,970.83 98.4 33,414.08 33,970.83 ID-26 Y 58,236.53 81.9 47,709.01 58,236.53 ID-27 N 153,558.95 71.6 109,997.63 153,558.95 ID-28 _ 6,003.22 17.0 1,022.00 6,003.22 ID-30 Y 29,135.97 64.2 18,695.27 29,135.97 ID-32 _ 12,534.89 36.8 4,609.88 12,534.89 ID-33 _ 12,004.58 0.0 - - ID-34 Y 138,408.48 49.2 68,159.92 138,408.48 ID-35 Y 27,353.69 68.6 18,754.03 27,353.69 ID-37 N 20,250.69 72.7 14,714.65 20,250.69 ID-39 Y 34,580.17 71.3 24,642.46 34,580.17 ID-40 _ 525,082.40 83.8 439,882.01 525,082.40 ID-42 Y 37,742.72 56.1 21,160.69 37,742.72 ID-43 _ 8,972.22 100.0 8,972.22 8,972.22 ID-44 _ 42,857.21 0.0 - - ID-45 _ 2,907.61 100.0 2,907.61 2,907.61 ID-46 _ 40,032.89 0.0 - - ID-47 _ 2,769.22 100.0 2,769.22 2,769.22 ID-48 Y 7,536.10 100.0 7,536.10 7,536.10 ID-49 Y 4,016.52 100.0 4,016.52 4,016.52 ID-50 _ 1,444.68 100.0 1,444.68 1,444.68 ID-51 _ 2,905.53 100.0 2,905.53 2,905.53 ID-52 Y 40,547.96 58.9 23,896.12 40,547.96 ID-53 _ 380.77 100.0 380.77 380.77 APPENDIX F- I ID-54 Y,Y 26,605.98 100.0 26,605.98 26,605.98 ID-55 Y 5,045.56 100.0 5,045.56 5,045.56 ID-56 Y 4,087.84 100.0 4,087.84 4,087.84 ID-57 N 44,339.18 38.5 17,081.24 44,339.18 ID-58 Y 29,598.66 64.0 18,954.72 29,598.66 ID-59 Y,N 419,872.95 26.1 109,621.26 419,872.95 ID-60 Y 35,249.93 69.6 24,528.42 35,249.93 ID-61 Y,Y 83,024.32 100.0 83,024.32 83,024.32 ID-62 Y 69,066.49 57.4 39,618.30 69,066.49 ID-63 N 17,785.62 89.4 15,89428 17,785.62 ID-64 Y 9,647.09 54.6 5,265.74 9,647.09 ID-65 N 28,951.93 62.5 18,089.05 28,951.93 ID-66 Y 12,386.34 77.4 9,585.55 12,386.34 ID-67 Y 19,000.04 87.2 16,565.47 19,000.04 ID-68 Y 24,819.00 38.5 9,560.42 24,819.00 ID-69 Y 22,280.59 62.8 13,988.76 22,280.59 ID-70 Y 14,999.99 64.5 9,676.52 14,999.99 ID-71 N 43,573.01 28.6 12,458.69 43,573.01 ID-72 Y 30,106.60 74.0 22,274.60 30,106.60 ID-73 Y 77,538.16 13.3 10,344.43 - ID-74 N 23,441.72 72.0 16,874.62 23,441.72 ID-75 Y,Y 73,435.49 31.0 22,756.35 73,435.49 ID-76 _ 138,773.98 3.4 4,767.26 - ID-77 Y 28,749.96 56.9 16,344.72 28,749.96 ID-78 Y 31,176.92 55.3 17,234.23 31,176.92 ID-79 Y 21,600.00 28.6 6,177.77 21,600.00 ID-80 _ 11,049.33 0.0 - - ID-81 _ 186,738.62 0.0 ID-B2 _ 11,248.88 0.0 - - D-83 - 13,561.31 0.0 - - ID-84 Y 30,791.25 41.3 12,731.13 30,791.25 ID-85 Y 18,963.49 12.5 2,377.34 - ID-86 Y 18,963.86 26.6 5,049.38 18,963.86 ID-87 Y 18,963.89 23.5 4,465.02 18,963.89 ID-88 Y 22,499.41 18.9 4,244.30 22,499.41 ID-89 N 22,499.44 18.2 4,103.53 22,499.44 ID-90 y 22,499.43 16.2 3,644.53. 22,499.43 ID-91 N 22,499.32 12.4 2,788.20 - ID-92 _ 20,796.23 0.8 168.48 - ID-93 N 15,993.30 19.9 3,174.94 15,993.30 ID-94 N 16,161.60 17.8 2,871.15 16,161.60 ID-95 N 24,417.35 12.3 3,010.85 - ID-97 Y 36,459.67 26.5 9,652.61 36,459.67 ID-100 _ 14,015.93 100.0 14,015.93 14,015.93 ID-101 _ 48,067.72 61.5 29,583.37 48,067.72 TOTALS . d. x 49/S3 6893,758,OT 3,037,925.09 6,006,43212 -CENTAGES 68.25%" - s° g _ - 72.62% APPENDIX F-2 1 i APPENDIX G BUT/FOR QUALIFICATIONS But For Analysis Current Market Value - Estimate $28,592,800 New Market Value - Estimate 210,500,000 Difference $181,907,200 Present Value of Tax Increment 15,468,323 Difference $166,428,877 Value Likely to Occur Without TIF is Less Than: $166,428,877 APPENDIX G-1 City of Eagan Redevelopment Eligibility Assessment Proposed "Cedar Grove" Redevelopment Area September 28, 2001 Prepared by: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) Butler Square Building, Suite 710C 100 North Oh Street Minneapolis, MN 55403 City of Eagan Cedar Grove Redevelopment Eligibility Assessments September 28, 2001 PURPOSE Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) was hired by the City of Eagan, Minnesota, to survey and evaluate the properties within the proposed "Cedar Grove" Tax Increment Financing District. This proposed district is located on both sides of MN Hwy. 13 east of Cedar Avenue ( MN Hwy. 77). The purpose of our work was to independently ascertain whether the qualification tests for tax increment eligibility, as required under Minnesota Statute, could be met. The findings and conclusions drawn herein are solely for the purpose of tax increment eligibility and are not intended to be used outside the scope of this assessment. SCOPE OF WORK The proposed district consists of 88 property parcels comprised of the following types of improvements: 14 single family residences, 48 commercial structures, 15 properties with only parking improvements and 12 vacant properties without any improvements (one parcel contains both a single family residence and a commercial structure). EVALUATIONS Of the sixty-three (63) buildings in the proposed district, fifty-four (54) building interiors were evaluated. A total of nine (9) buildings were available for exterior evaluation only. FINDINGS Coverage Test - Sixty-eight (68) of the eighty-eight (88) properties met the coverage test with a 72% area coverage. This exceeds the 70% area coverage requirement. Condition of Buildings Test - Sixty (60) percent of the buildings - 38 of the 63 buildings - were found to be "structurally substandard" when considering code deficiencies and other deficiencies of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance (see definition of "structurally substandard" as follows). This exceeds the Condition of Buildings Test whereby over 50% of buildings, not including outbuildings, must be found "structurally substandard." CONCLUSION Our surveying and evaluating of the properties within this proposed Redevelopment District render results that in our professional opinion qualify the district eligible under the statutory criteria and formulas for Tax Increment Financing District Funding. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ATTACHED Summary report detailing the above findings. 2 1St PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS The properties were surveyed and evaluated in accordance with the following requirements under Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (c) which states: Interior Inspection - "The municipality may not make such determination [that the building is structurally substandard] without an interior inspection of the property..." Exterior Inspection and Other Means - "An interior inspection of the property is not required, if the municipality fords that (1) the municipality or authority is unable to gain access to the property; and after using its best efforts to obtain permission from the party that owns or controls the property; and (2) the evidence otherwise supports a reasonable conclusion that the building is structurally substandard." Documentation - "Written documentation of the building findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained under section 469.175, subdivision 3, clause (1)." PROCEDURES FOLLOWED TO MEET REQUIREMENTS The City of Eagan sent letters to all property owners and tenants located in the district requesting that an interior inspection and evaluation be made of their property. SEH canvassed the proposed area during a two-week period at the end of July, 2001. An interior inspection and evaluation was completed if consented to by the owner or owner's representative. An exterior inspection and evaluation was made of the property where either the owner refused interior access to their property or the scheduling of the evaluation was not able to be coordinated with the owner within the time given for the evaluations. For all subject buildings, the City of Eagan collected a listing of all available building permits on record, noting date issued and types of work completed for each permit. SEH reviewed this list as well as several actual permits for a sample of buildings. Additional building data was collected from public taxpayer information available from Dakota County. Building data from these public records was combined with and reviewed against information gathered in the field. QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS The properties were surveyed and evaluated to ascertain whether the qualification tests for tax increment eligibility for a redevelopment district, required under the following Minnesota Statutes, could be met. Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (a) (1) requires two tests for occupied parcels: 1. Coverage Test - "parcels consisting of 70 percent of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or similar structures 3 4 Note: The coverage required by the parcel to be considered occupied is defined under Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (e) which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, a parcel is not occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures unless 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures." 2. Condition of Buildings Test - " and more than 50 percent of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance;" Note: Structurally substandard is defined under Minnesota Statute Section 469.174, Subdivision 10, clause (b) which states: "For purposes of this subdivision, "structurally substandard" shall mean containing defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance." Structurally substandard is further defined in the statute under Subdivision 10, clause (c) which states: "A building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with building code applicable to new buildings or could be modified to satisfy the building code at a cost of less than 15 percent of the cost of constructing a new structure of the same square footage and type on the site. The municipality may find that a building is not disqualified as structurally substandard under the preceding sentence on the basis of reasonably available evidence, such as the size, type, and age of the building, the average cost of plumbing, electrical, or structural repairs, or other similar reliable evidence." "Items of evidence that support such a conclusion [that the building is structurally substandard] include recent fire or police inspections, on-site property appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence." 4 /0// MEASUREMENTS AGAINST TECHNICAL TEST REQUIREMENTS Coverage Test The City of Eagan utilized a GIS (Geographic Information Systems) database, available through Dakota County, to obtain individual parcel information. The GIS database contains both graphic information (parcel and building shapes) and numerical data based on county tax records. This information was shared with SEH for the purposes of this assessment. The total square foot area of each property parcel was obtained from county records (GIS) and general site verification. The total square foot area of site improvements on each property parcel was digitized from recent aerial photography (Spring, 2001) and compared with county records (building area) and general site verification. The total percentage of coverage of each property parcel was computed to determine if the 15% requirement was met. The total area of all qualifying property parcels was compared to the total area of all parcels to determine if the 70% requirement was met. Condition of Building Test Replacement Cost - the cost of constructing a new structure of the same size and type on site: R. S. Means Square Foot Costs was used as the industry standard for base cost calculations. R. S. Means is a nationally published reference tool for construction cost data. The book is updated yearly and establishes a "national average" for materials and labor prices for all types of building construction. The base costs derived from R. S. Means were reviewed, and modified if applicable, against our professional judgement and experience. A base cost was calculated by first establishing building class, building construction type, and construction quality level (residential construction) to obtain the appropriate Means cost per square foot. This cost was multiplied times the building square footage to obtain the total replacement cost for an individual building. Building Deficiencies - determining technical conditions that are not in compliance with current building code applicable to new buildings and the cost to correct the deficiencies: On-Site evaluations - Evaluation of each building was made by reviewing available information from city records and making interior and/or exterior evaluations. On-site evaluations were completed using a standard checklist format. The standard checklist was derived from several standard building code 5 ~ T plan review checklists and was intended to address the most common, easily identifiable code deficiencies. Mechanical Engineers, Electrical Engineers, and Building Code Officials were also consulted in the development of the checklist. Deficiencies were generally grouped into the following categories (category names are followed by its applicable building code): • Building accessibility - Minnesota Accessibility Code • Building egress, building construction - Uniform Building Code • Fire protection systems - Uniform Building Code • Food service - Minnesota Food Code • Energy code compliance - Minnesota Energy Code • HVAC (heating, ventilating, and air conditioning) - Uniform Mechanical Code • Electrical systems - National Electric Code and Minnesota Energy Code Office evaluations - Following the on-site evaluation, each building was then reviewed, based on on-site data, age of construction, building usage and occupancy, square footage, and known improvements (from building permit data), and an assessment was made regarding compliance with current mechanical, electrical, and energy codes. A basic code review was also completed regarding the potential need for additional egress (basement stairways, for example), sprinkler systems, or elevators. Deficiency Cost - Costs to correct identified deficiencies were determined by using R. S. Means Cost Data and our professional judgement and experience. Actual construction costs are affected by many factors (bidding climate, size of project, etc.). Due to the nature of this assessment, we were only able to generalize the scope of work for each correction; that is to say that detailed plans, quantities, and qualities of materials were not possible to be known. Our approach to this matter was to determine a preliminary cost projection suitable to the level of detail that is known. This process was similar to our typical approach for a cost projection that may be given to an owner during a schematic design stage of a project. Costs to correct deficiencies were computed for each building and compared to the building replacement cost to determine if the 15% requirement was met. The total number of buildings determined to be "structurally substandard" in this manner was compared to the total number of buildings in the district to determine if the 50% requirement was met. 6 /6_3 Technical Conditions Resources - the following list represents the current building codes applicable to new buildings used in the Building Deficiency review: 1997 Uniform Building Code MN 1341- Minnesota Accessibility Code, Chapter 1341 (1999) 2000 Minnesota Energy Code, Chapters 7672, 7674, or 7676 Minnesota Food Code, Chapter 4626 (1998) 1999 National Electric Code 1997 Uniform Mechanical Code PROJECT TEAM: Molly A. Olivier, Interior Designer Jason P. Zemke, AIA, Project Architect Nancy G. Schultz, AIA, Principal 7 ~ r amie Y_erbrugge From: Jamie Verbrugge`. Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:06 AM To: Patrick Hogan (E-mail) Subject: Cable Television Interview - Mr. Hamiel Pat, Thank you again for making yourself and MAC staff available for our request to do a cable television program focusing on the City of Eagan and its relationship to the airport. As I mentioned, things have obviously changed significantly in the past 2 weeks. As we discussed earlier, I would like to sit down with Mr. Hamiel for a Y.-hour interview for our local access cable television. The interview would be conducted at the Burnsville-Eagan Community Television studio at 4155 Old Sibley Mem Hwy (directions and map linked here - MapQuest : Driving Directions Results The items that I would expect to cover will include: • Effect on airport operations as a result of industry wide reductions in personnel and operations; discussion to include increased safety and security measures • Effect on MAC expansion projects, especially North-South runway • Explanation of MAC finances, including bond ratings supported by revenues and taxing authority; discussion of whether MAC could foresee utilizing tax authority to offset revenue reductions or to preserve bond rating, and an explanation of financial relationship with NWA and other carriers • Current state of MAC noise program and discussion of MAC as national leader in noise mitigation efforts • Potential impacts on noise mitigation efforts • Mr. Hamiel's role as president of ACI-NA This will most likely be an "off-the-cuff" interview that follows the conversation. I would expect that other issues might be raised, but the list above is more than sufficient for good discussion. Also, as we discussed, I would like to be allowed some access to get background footage shots - departing and arriving aircraft, construction of N/S runway and other project areas - to use for this interview and future programming efforts. Again, Pat, thank you for your efforts. Jamie Verbrugge Assistant City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 651-681-4603 (voice) 651-681-4612 (fax) 145- CITY OF EAGAN REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT SUBSTANDARD DETERMINATIO SITE AREA COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE ID CODE N (s.f.) % COVERAGE (s.f.) QUANTITY ID-01102 N 723,054.72 77.51 560,412.32 723,054.72 ID-03 - 608,746.48 12.1 73,85820 - ID-04 - 46,685.70 0.0 - ID-05 - 67,010.41 4.0 2,698.17 - ID-06 - 64,583.75 1.7 1,092.03 - ID-07 - 801.91 0.0 . 1D-08 N 358,870.83 84.2 302,170.42 358,870.83 ID-09 Y 282,554.56 61.1 172,635.64 282,554.56 ID-10 Y 54,103.42 68.8 37,210.49 54,103.42 ID-11/12 N 828,802.97 18.5 118,18027 628,802.97 03.14 Y 29,466.50 75.8 22,326.93 29,466.50 ID-15 - 213,987.73 0.0 - - ID-17 - 265,048.62 0.0 - - ID-18 N 261,356.84 45.9 119,938.62 261,356.84 ID-20 Y 46,219.11 85.1 39,350.86 46,219.11 ID-21 N 43,602.19 100.0 43,602.19 43,602.19 ID-22 - 42,886.34 53.3 22,843.42 42,886.34 ID-23 - 8,326.69 100.0 8,326.69 8,326.69 03-24 N 56,171.74 77.9 42,980.88 55,171.74 ID-25 - 33,970.83 98.4 33,414.08 33,970.83 ID-26 N 58,236.53 81.9 47,709.01 58,236.53 ID-27 N 153,558.95 71.6 109,997.63 153,558.95 ID-28 - 6,003.22 17.0 1,022.00 6,003.22 ID-30 N 29,135.97 64.2 18,69527 29,135.97 ID-32 - 12,534.89 36.8 4,609.68 12,534.89 ID-33 - 12,004.58 0.0 - - ID-34 Y 138,408.48 49.2 68,159.92 138,408.48 ID-35 N 27,353.69 68.6 18,754.03 27,353.69 10-37 N 20,250.69 72.7 14,714.65 20,250.69 ID-39 N 34,580.17 71.3 24,642.46 34,580.17 ID-40 N 525,082.40 83.8 439,882.01 525,082.40 ID-42 Y 37,742.72 56.1 21,160.69 37,742.72 10-43 - 8,972.22 100.0 8,972.22 8,972.22 ID-44 - 42,85721 0.0 - - ID-45 - 2,907.61 100.0 2,907.61 2,907.61 ID-46 - 40,032.89 0.0 - - 1D47 - 2,76922 100.0 2,76922 2,769.22 ID-48 Y 7,536.10 100.0 7,536.10 7,536.10 1D-49 Y 4,016.52 100.0 4,016.52 4,016.52 ID-5o - 1,444.68 100.0 1,444.68 1,444.68 0-51 - 2,905.53 100.0 2,905.53 2,905.53 ID-52 Y 40,547.96 58.9 23,896.12 40,547.96 10-53 - 360.77 100.0 380.77 380.77 ID-54 Y,Y 26,805.96 100.0 26,605.98 2605.98 ID-55 Y 5,045.56 100.0 5,045.56 5,045.56 ID-56 Y 4,067.84 100.0 4,087.84 4,087.84 ID-57 N 44,339.18 38.5 17,081.24 44,339.18 ID-58 Y 29,598.66 64.0 18,954.72 29,598.66 W-59 Y,N 419,87295 26.1 109,621.26 419,872.95 1 T CITY OF EAGAN REDEVELOPMENT ELIGIBILITY ASSESSMENT SUBSTANDARD DETERMINATIO SITE AREA COVERAGE SITE COVERAGE ID CODE N (s.f.) % COVERAGE (s.f.) QUANTITY ID-60 Y 35,249.93 69.6 24,528.42 35,249.93 x-61 Y,Y 83,024.32 IWO 83,024.32 83,024.32 ID-62 Y 69,066.49 57.4 39,618.30 69,066.49 ID-63 N 17,785.62 89.4 15,894.28 17,785.62 ID-64 Y 9,647.09 54.6 5,265.74 9,647.09 9D-65 N 26,951.93 62.5 18,089.05 28,951.93 10-66 Y 12,386.34 77.4 9,585.55 12,386.34 ID-67 Y 19,000.04 87.2 16,565.47 19,000.04 ID-68 Y 24,819.D0 38.5 9,560.42 24,819.00 ID-69 Y 22,280.59 62.8 13,988.76 22,280.59 ID-70 Y 14,999.99 64.5 9,676.52 14,999.99 ID-71 N 43,573.01 28.6 12,458.69 43,573.01 1D-72 Y 30,106.60 74.0 22,274.60 30,106.60 ID-73 Y 77.538.16 13.3 10,344.43 - ID-74 N 23,441.72 72.0 16,874.62 23,441.72 ID-75 Y,Y 73,435.49 31.0 22,756.35 73,435.49 ID-76 - 138,77198 3.4 4,767.26 - 1D-77 Y 28,749.96 56.9 16,344.72 28,749.96 ID-78 Y 31,176.92 55.3 17,234.23 31,176.92 1D-79 N 21,600.00 26.6 6,177.77 21,600.00 0-80 - 11,049.33 0.0 - - ID-81 - 186,738.62 0.0 - ID-82 - 11,248.88 0.0 - ID-83 - 13,561.31 0.0 - - ID-84 Y 30,79125 41.3 12,731.13 30,79125 ID-85 Y 18,963.49 12.5 2,377.34 - ID-86 Y 18,963.86 26.6 5,049.38 18,963.86 ID-87 Y 18,963.89 23.5 4,465.02 16,963.89 ID-88 Y 22,499.41 18.9 4,244.30 22,499.41 ID-89 N 22,499.44 18.2 4,103.53 22,499.44 ID-90 Y 22,499.43 16.2 3,644.53 22,499.43 ID-91 N 22,499.32 12.4 2,788.20 - ID-92 - 20,796.23 0.6 168.48 - ID-93 N 15,993.30 19.9 3,174.94 15,99130 ID-94 N 16,161.60 17.8 2,871.15 16,161.60 ID-95 N 24,417.35 12.3 3,010.85 - 1D-97 Y 36,459.67 26.5 9,652.61 36,459.67 ID-100 - 14,015.93 100.0 14,015.93 14,015.93 ID-101 - 48,067.72 61.5 29,583.37 48,067.72 Y 12 6 KAREN E. MARTY Attorney at Law 3601 Minnesota Drive Telephone: (952) 921-5859 Suite 880 e-mail: lanarty@ix.netcom.com Bloomington, MN 55435 Fax: (952) 830-8211 September 21, 2001 Mayor and Members of the City Council 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Dear Mayor and Members of the City Council: I represent Doris Dahline. As you know, she has been extremely upset at the prospect of losing her house. She wants to remain there for the remainder of her life, even if she would not be able to pass her home on to her children. She has undertaken a project a year, for 20 years, to make her house and yard unique, valuable, and a wonderful place to live. We do understand the City's desire to improve the Silver Bell Road / Highway 13 intersection, and to stimulate some redevelopment in the Cedervale area. However, extending this project to Ms. Dahline's lot and house puts tremendous pressure on her. We have discussed giving an Option to the City, which we believe would create a win-win situation, protecting both the City and Ms. Dahline's interests. Specifically, the Option would include the following concepts: 1. The City would contractually agree that, regardless of what is provided for in the adopted TIF District and Redevelopment Plan, Ms. Dahline could remain in her home without threat of condemnation, for the remainder of her life. (For this reason, Ms. Dahline has been calling this a "life estate", even though that is not the correct legal term.) Some restrictions necessary to protect Ms. Dahline and the City would need to be included, such as: a. If Ms. Dahline decided to move or sell the house, she would tell the City first, and give the City the opportunity to purchase her property at a fair price. Either the City or a developer of the City's choice could exercise this option. b. If the City (or developer) did not choose to purchase her property within some specified time frame, and the City also did not choose to initiate condemnation within that specified time frame, then Ms. Dahline could sell the property to anyone of her choice. C. So long as the house remains Ms. Dahline's primary residence, even if she were forced to temporarily "reside" in a medical facility, the City would not attempt to take Ms. Dahline's house by condemnation. 68' _ ~ i d. At any time the City may ask Ms. Dahline if she would be willing to be condemned. If she declined, then the matter would be ended. If she agreed in writing to be condemned, then the normal condemnation process would be followed. 2. Upon Ms. Dahline's death, her estate would contact the City, and give the City the opportunity to purchase her property at a fair price. Either the City or a developer of the City's choice could exercise this option. If the City (or developer) chose to purchase the property, but the City (or developer) and Ms. Dahline's estate could not agree as to what would be a fair price, then the City would have the option of condemnation. If the City (or developer) did not choose to purchase Ms. Dahline's property within a specified reasonable time frame, then her estate could sell it to anyone of its choice. 3. The wetland on and adjacent to Ms. Dahline's lot should be left unfilled and undamaged at least until her property is sold. Normal wetland delineation may be required to determine the precise outlines of this wetland, but the intention would be to protect and preserve the existing wetland and its surrounding vegetation (including the wooded area) in order to protect the habitat of the existing wildlife. To actually accomplish these items, the City Attorney and I would need to work up some legal language. However, we wished to present this proposal to the City and seek your approval of the concept. Thank you for your time. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Karen E. Marty Attorney at Law cc: Doris Dahline Jamie Verbrugge Michael G. Dougherty X69 _ _ MEMO City of Eagan TO: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES CITY ATTORNEY DOUGHERTY FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ADMINISTRATOR VERBRUGGE DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 2001 SUBJECT: CEDAR GROVE TIF/DAHLINE REQUEST FOR LIFE ESTATE Attached is the copy of a letter provided by Ms. Doris Dahline, 3830 Alder Lane, from her attorney regarding Ms. Dahline's interest in negotiating a life estate of her property. As you are aware, Ms. Dahline's single-family residential property is proposed for inclusion in the Cedar Grove Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment District. Ms. Dahline has made numerous appearances before the City Council and has had numerous correspondences and conversations with City staff regarding her strong desire to be excluded from the Cedar Grove redevelopment area. The disposition of Ms. Dahline's issue is appropriately a policy decision of the City Council at the time that they establish the boundaries for the Cedar Grove TIF District. Ms. Dahline understands this and will be asking for such consideration at the Public Hearing on October 2, 2001. There are several options that will be available to the City Council in regard to the Dahline property and should be communicated to them in the likely event that a formal request is presented to the Council prior to the October 2 Public Hearing: • The Council may opt to keep the property within the redevelopment district. The recent lot coverage analysis to qualify the redevelopment district assumes the inclusion of the Dahline property. • The Council may opt to carve the Dahline property, and/or any other property, out of the proposed TIF District boundaries. As stated above, the qualifying coverage percentage assumes the property is included. Further analysis will need to be conducted to determine the impacts of removing the property and maintaining the statutory lot coverage percentage to enact the district. An additional issue of carving out the property is the potential impact to future development proposals for the area. Eligibility restrictions for siting buildings around a ~ i Cedar Grove TIF/Dahline Property September 20, 2001 carved out parcel will likely require a plan design that avoids the property or utilizes it as an outlot for parking or other supporting development needs. It is important to note that removing the Dahline property from the TIF district at this time does not preclude the property from being acquired in the future. It will limit the flexibility with which tax increment may be applied to facilitate development. • The Council may negotiate a life estate with the property owner. This is clearly the preferred option expressed by Ms. Dahline. The life estate that is likely to be presented by Ms. Dahline's attorney would be for the period of time that Ms. Dahline wishes to remain on the property. This could have significant impacts on future development, both in terms of limiting site plan flexibility and in creating potentially incompatible land uses within close proximity of one another. I spoke earlier today with Karen E. Marty, Attorney at Law, representing Ms. Dahline. We discussed the best process for bringing this issue before the Council. It is my understanding that Ms. Marty will submit a letter directly to the City Council requesting consideration of a life estate for the Dahline property. I would suggest that the options outlined above should be made available to the City Council for their consideration once the formal request has been received. It would be appropriate to include Council direction in the formal action to be taken on October 2 in regard to the proposed Cedar Grove TIF District. Please let me know if any additional information is required of you prior to October 2, 2001. Assistant City Administrator Copy: James D. Prosser, Ehlers & Associates 2 /7/ September 23, 2001 Dear Mayor and Council members, As elected representatives of our City you make decisions on behalf of the citizens. I have brought before you and talked about tangible things. Such as: My being in the same home for 40 years and being a retired person Having a beautifully maintained home I have talked of road alignment Wetland preservation and flooding & storm water issues. Now I want to speak of the in-tangible Feelings and Stress. I want to share something with you, but first I want to say, "I believe if we have personally experienced something, we have a much better understanding of `it', and therefore the choices or decisions we make about `it' are much wiser." You will not have experienced what I have experienced, but if I tell you I' hand, you may have a better understanding for decisions that you will make TODAY and in the future. I believe what I have been experiencing these past several months, is almost like the loss of a loved one. The feelings of: Anger, Why me, Disbelief, Denial, to Give-up or to Fight. Early on I began to fantasize: # 1. That I would throw myself in front of the bulldozer when you came. (I have 100 people that said they would join me since then). # 2. That I would look at your individual homes, see which one I liked best, bulldoze it - and I would build on YOUR lot. # 3. Move my home, but it will cost you $1,000,000 to duplicate what I have. Sometimes my dreams and fanaticizes mushed together. In June I was still sitting in my bedroom crying. In July a 57" angel came into my life and gave me encouragement and direction. In August State Representative Tim Wilkin came to my home. Both he and Dakota County Commissioner Nancy Schouweiler encouraged me, "to work with the City". I continued to fantasize some 1. Put everything in storage and go to Sweden or India for a year. 2. Have the city give me a$], 000, 000 and I'll design and build another home. 3. Like my gir#~iend said, "Die and you won't have to worry about it" That's `kinds' when 1 decided to survive. Even then, I wasn't sure 1 could survive another crises in my life. [I have had several]. ~ r I have heard you say, "I know how you feel You do not know how I feel. To know how I feel you must have empathy. When you are a senior citizen (and I hope you all live long enough to have that privilege) and there is a new council that has complete control over your destiny, then you will have empathy. To quote Paul Bakken, "I'm for long term goals, such as; fostering independence in the creation and retention of household wealth" Question for Paul- Is 24 years (1977 - 2001) long enough for me to be independent in the creation (Preservation) & retention (Financial) of goals to keep my home/household wealth? Surely after your statement and my proof of performance for over 24 years, you cannot vote to allow my home to be vulnerable to condemnation. The stress is horrendous - to feel powerless. I am consumed with thoughts of what-to-do. I can no longer sleep through a night. I no longer ask for the logic of WHY Why am I in the `District' now and the Highland and Liquor store are not? In the Village Plaza Plan -Highlands and Liquor store are IN the Cedarl3/Redevelopment Study and Langhoven is not. Highlands and the Liquor store are centered in the business district - I am a mile away. Highland and the Liquor store are at a major junction of Rahn Rd and Beau D'Rue - I am on a `dead end' road. My life is on `Hold'- The Summer of 2001, I had planned to: Resurface my driveway Remove a sick evergreen ($400) Replace, $200 Trim 3 Ash trees in the front (the back 3 were done last year) Continue development of perennial beds in Patio/Garden (1 or 2 beds each year) Have lawn service aerate the grounds Inside - Refinish all the window ledges in the house. I take on one major project each year. (I refinished the ledges in the den and dining room before all this started). NONE of these things were done. I can let this slip for one year, but I cannot continua ia. this state of limbo for long. It is far too stressful! ! Added note: For years my trees have been trimmed, fertilized, sprayed and root fed professionally by S&S Tree and Horticultural Specialists. The lawn is fed and weed controlled by New Frontier Lawn Care professionals - to care for the lawn, but also to protect the wetland. There were almost 220 signatures on my submitted petition. For Paul's benefit - I did not go door-to-door, these were all people that know me and care about me, my livelihood, and my home situation. They would be here tonight, but I told them the City does not have enough parking or enough room in these chambers to accommodate them. In closing, I am asking your approval of a concept I have proposed through my lawyer. I employ you to be sensitive to the people you represent. Sincerely. Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 D. HARVEY'S HERITAGE ADDITION (LOT 3. BLOCK 1) EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and approve the vacation of public drainage and utility easement on Lot 3, Block 1, Harvey's Heritage Addition, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all related documents. FACTS: • On August 23, 2001, City staff received a letter from Greg Yakovlev, requesting the vacation of a portion of the existing drainage and utility easement on Lot 3, Block 1, Harvey's Heritage Addition (1375 Braun Court). • The easement was originally dedicated to the City as part of the Harvey's Heritage Addition for drainage and utility purposes. The side lot easement is a standard plat dedication to accommodate site drainage and possible future utility uses. • The purpose of the request is to allow Mr. Yakovlev to keep an existing storage shed with a portion that was inadvertently constructed into the drainage and utility easement. The request would vacate only the portion of the existing easement needed to keep the shed in its current place. • City staff have been consulted, and determined that the location of the constructed shed will not adversely affect the site drainage and current utilities, and have found this request to be in order for favorable Council action. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page • Legal Description/Easement, page • Vacation Request Letter, page ~ r Q q LONE OAK ROAD DD u~ o,o 9-19-01 , D 4 Z ZU r y 1~ $ Y "IAY Z IL 8 Y YANKEE DOqDLE ROAD YANKEE DOODLE ROAD c co. ao. m > ~D a °C~DD ~D a Proposed Vacation a Q Qo 0 WESCOTT RD. WESCOTT ROAD F-I oo a (00. RD 30) DIFFLEY ROAD ~D Propo sement Vacation Location Map arvey's Heritage 9-19-01 City of Eagan Lot 3, Block 1 L~~ J ULC~ k J e (,t tc~ Y ~ 36 , NNI Nr- r Car, • I / Loo , I 0-7 ! 3 7s Ew ~ Cj. n 0 Commencing at the NE comer of Lot 3, Block 1, Harvey's Heritage I o Addition, Dakota County, thence along the NE line of said Lot 3 a distance of 13.00 feet, thence left 90 degrees a distance of 3.00 feet to the point of beginning of the area to be vacated, thence continuing along said line a distance of 2.00 feet, thence right 90 degrees a distance of 11.00 feet, thence right 90 degrees a distance of 2.00 feet, thence right 90 degrees to the point of beginning and there ending. l I Y August 23, 2001 City of Eagan Council 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122-1897 Dear Eagan City Council, This letter is to request a vacation of easement per the attached petition. The reason for the request is that I built a storage shed in such a location as to save the 3 very mature trees in the adjacent area. I even notched the shed to do so. However, I inadvertently infringed on the easement by 23 inches. This is in such a location as to not be seen by anyone as it is behind a fence built by my neighbor. There are no utility lines found by Gopher State One on my rear property line (digging #447316). I respectfully request a variance to this easement. Greg Yakovlev 1375 Braun Court Eagan MN 55123 Ph (651)454-3059 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 E. EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NOS. 3(L 1 & 2, B 4) & 4(L 1-3, B 2) EASEMENT VACATION ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Close the public hearing and continue any action of the vacation of public drainage and utility easements within Eagandale Center Industrial Park Nos. 3 & 4, until consideration of the Final Plat for Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 17. FACTS: • On August 1, 2001, City staff received a letter from Thomas Hodorff, Harry S. Johnson Land Surveyors, representing 789 Company, requesting the vacation of the existing drainage and utility easements on Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 as part of the re-platting of these parcels. • The easements were originally dedicated to the City as part of the plats in the Eagandale Center Industrial Park for drainage and utility purposes. These easements were standard plat dedications to accommodate site drainage and possible future utility uses. • The purpose of the request is to allow 789 Company to re-plat the five parcels into two parcels. New drainage and utility easements will be dedicated along the new lot lines when the parcels are re-platted. • The request would vacate the existing easements, avoiding future conflicts with underlying easements. • City Engineering staff have reviewed the request found it to be in order for favorable Council action when the replacement easements are provided. ISSUES: • The final plat approval for the replat of Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 2, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4 has not been scheduled for Council consideration yet. It would be appropriate for the approval of the easement vacation to occur concurrently with the final plat approval at a future date. ATTACHMENTS: • Location Map, page. • Legal Description/Exhibit, page • Vacation Request Letter, page 78' i 1 F3W Q INTERSTATE 494 LKJ 8 9-19-01 Cq Proposed Vacation a UDW ow RoAn LONE OAK ROAD TRUNK 4 Ab. SS ~ Q Z a o C7 Y W Z 3 J o 4 U ~AYL J J i U W W Y YAru YANKEE DOODLE ROAD (co. RD. 28 RD. DR. D s DucKrooD oR. pa 31 a S 0 c-~ J WESCOTT ROAD 1C5?J J~ \J II xr r.~\~l r Proposed Ease nt/Right-of-Way Vacation Location Map 9-19-01 City of Eagan Eagandale Center Indust. Park No. 3 & 4 Schedule A Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 4, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO 3, Dakota County, Minnesota and South half of adjoining vacated Apollo Road. And Lots 1, 2, 3, Block 2, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 4, Dakota County, Minnesota Schedule B Vacate drainage and utility easements within Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 4, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3, Dakota County, Minnesota as dedicated on said plat. And Vacate drainage and utility easements within Lots 2, 3, Block 2, EAGANDALE CENTER INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 4, Dakota County, Minnesota as dedicated on said plat. i i X A `1/\I 1 )P1 ~ b•I". 1 t_V P\, \/L.L. t/ I'\V/1y N 07SS1- I moo 1 L. V VL.I. V r\\/I1V f j k UITIUTY SEMENT EAGANDALrCENTER USTRIAL PA K NO. 3 A A ^ 1^ ` SCALE: 1 = 1001 f-A L'A %)I A a.VT 1 ^L. i l` ^ * JJ' \ / \n \ v~l ~ ~Ji►1 \ a.vT ~ c ` 1 \1 ~ 1 / CA-xzsvr r / 351.97 1 R-570.00 DRAINAGE Ac UITILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT, EAGANDALE CENTER o I \ INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 4 \ 1 /1T \ l.V 1 i I \ 1 I I 1 - N e9'267e w 2137 - 1 t3-I61-201 3: 18PM FROM HARRY S JOHNSON CO 612 884 5344 P.2 HARRY S. JOHNSON LAND SURVEYORS Bruce Allen Engineering Department City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, Minnesota 55122 Re: Petition to vacate drainage and'utility easements located in a portion of Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 and Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4. Dear Bruce, Representing 789 Company in the replatting process of a parcel of land (Schedule A) in the City of Eagan, we have been requested by the City to submit, a Petition to Vacate, for the vacation of drainage & utility easement found in the referenced parcel. The legal descriptions of easements to be vacated are shown in, Schedule B. Presently the parcel lies in two existing plats, Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 3 and Eagandale Center Industrial Park No. 4. Our intention is to replat subject property into a single two-lot plat. The proposed plat has been submitted to the City of Eagan planning department and it is our intent to rededicate drainage and utility on the new plat as requested by City. Any questions concerns or additional requests please contact our office. Thank you, Thomas E. HHarry S. Johnson Co., Inc. 170 West 79"' Street Bloomington, MN 55454 tele (952)884-5341 fax (952)884-5344 e-malt; tom@hsjsurVey0rS.com (Y I t l Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting F. PROJECT 748, JOHNNY CAKE RIDGE ROAD STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 748 (Johnny Cake Ridge Road - Street & Utility Improvements) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 748 provided for the extension of new street and utility improvements for Johnny Cake Ridge Road from Diffley Road (County Road 30) to Deerwood Drive to serve the 117 acre Oakbrooke Addition by Pulte Homes of Minnesota, in central Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report. • The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on August 21, 2001, with a public hearing originally scheduled for September 17 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. The public hearing was continued to the October 2 meeting due a typographical error in the published notice regarding the original hearing date. • The final assessments are approximately 0.1% more than the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on December 15, 1998. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to the affected property owners. As of this date, the City has not received any objections to the proposed assessments. • As part of the development contract for the Oakbrooke Additions, Pulte Homes of Minnesota has signed a waiver of objection to the levy of special assessments associated with Project 748. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, page./Vthroughfiq. /8.3 FINAL ASSESSMENT DARING PROJECT HEARING DATES NUMBER - Project 748 ASSESSMENT - October 2, 2001 NAME - Johnny Cake Ridge Road IMPROVEMENT- December 15-1998 Utility and Street Installation IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED F.R.=Feasiblity Report FINAL F.R FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS SANITARY STORM SEWER SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk 0 Lateral 679.44 776.57 /Lot 0 Lateral Oakbrooke Properties 997.35 867.99 Lot ❑ Service Properties South of Diffley .087 .076 S9 Ft ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral 0 Johnny Cake 900.04 887.58 /Lot ❑ Service ® Turn Lanes 277.99 133.93 /Lot ® Lat. Benefit/wink 353.41 24.86 /Lot ❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. ® Trail/Sidewalk 84.41 64.54 /Lot SERVICE PAIRS STREET LIGHTS ® Water and Sanitary 0 Installation N/A 115.57 /Lot Sewer 64.64 95.64 /Lot ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO. OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $1,130,965 F.R. $564,125 F.R. 99-05 171 15 Years 7.00% $1.138.934.69 $410,994.44 COMMENTS: ~ t MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall, Financial Consultant DATE: August 3, 2001 SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll, Project 748 Johnny Cake Ridge Road Extension The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on December 15, 1998 ordered Project 748. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and or assessed: sanitary sewer lateral, water main, storm sewer lateral, trunk storm sewer, turn lane, trail and street improvements. In the feasibility report, it was proposed to assess the storm sewer improvements using linear and area methods of assessment. Properties south of Diffley Road were proposed for assessment using an area method of assessment. The area method of assessment was used in the preparation of this assessment roll. All other improvements were proposed for assessment using a linear method. Because this improvement was petitioned for by the developer of the Oakbrooke Subdivisions this assessment roll is prepared using a unit method of assessment not the linear method proposed in the feasibility report. The construction of the improvement was accomplished under Contracts No. 99- 05, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for September 17, 2001. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. 1. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $1,054,112.20 paid to the contractors for the construction of the following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of. engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling $495,816.93 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $1,549,929.13. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I. These other costs are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement and the assessment rate. Construction Other Improvement Feasibility Improvement Cost Costs Cost Report Sanitary sewer lateral $ 144,633.80 $ 68,030.60 $ 212,664.40 $243,065 Water main 116,105.90 54,612.09 170,717.99 233,300 Service pairs 13,759.10 6,471.79 20,230.89 29,935 Trunk storm sewer 60,655.10 28,530.00 89,185.10 68,500 Lateral storm sewer 272,229.60 128,047.14 400,276.74 348,880 Street 336,821.17 158,428.71 495,249.88 544,838 Street-turn lanes 73,971.63 34,793.63 108,765.26 52,400 Bituminous trail 35,935.90 16,902.97 52,838.87 40,400 Traffic control signal 195,200 Streetlights 36,172 Total $1,054,112.20 $495,816.93 $1,549,929.13 $1,792,690 2 14FS--- II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS The properties affected by this project were charged for sanitary sewer and water trunk improvements through prior public improvement projects. Trunk storm sewer is being collected using the connection charge ordinance. B. UTILITY LATERAL AND STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Sanitary Sewer Lateral Improvement Sanitary sewer laterals were installed beneath Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The laterals are extensions of laterals previously installed in Diffley Road and Deerwood Drive. The construction cost was $144,633.80. Other costs in the amount of $68,030.60 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and assessable cost of $212,664.40 to the benefited parcels. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $212,664.40 313 Units $679.44/Unit 2. Water-Main Improvement A 12 inch DIP water main with appurtenances and a pressure reducing station was installed beneath Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The water main was extended from Diffley Road to Deerwood Drive. The construction cost was $116,105.90. Other costs in the amount of $54,612.09 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement cost of $170,717.99. The feasibility report called for an 8-inch equivalent to be assessed. The 8 inch equivalent cost was computed using the following: Improvement Cost $116,105.90 Less 2,840 Lineal Feet 8-inch DIP to 12-inch DIP 6.20/L. F. 17,608.00 1 each 16" X 8" wet tap vs 16" X 12" tap 100.00 ea 100.00 7 each 8" GV. Vs 12" BV 186.00 ea 1,302.00 4365 lbs Fittings for 8" vs 12" 1.00/lb 4,365.00 1 each Pressure reducing station $17,500.00 ea 17,500.00 8 in equivalent cost 75,230.90 Add other costs @47.04% 35,385.94 8 inch eqivalent portion $110,616.84 3 1,~6 1 1 The feasibility report proposed the assessment to the abutting property using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $110,616.84 313 Units $353.41/Unit The water main improvement costs that are not assessed are to be financed by the City's Water Trunk Fund. 3. Water and Sanitary Sewer Pairs Improvement 12 water and sanitary sewer pairs were installed in bubble cul-de-sacs that extend from Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The service pairs are extended from the water and sanitary sewer laterals that were installed with this project. The construction cost for the service pairs was $13,759.10. Other costs in the amount of $6,471.79 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and assessable cost of $20,230.89 to the benefited parcels. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $20,230.89 313 Units $64.64/Unit 4. Trunk Storm Sewer Improvements The trunk storm sewer improvements consist of the outlets to Ponds BP-35, BP-35.1 and BP-25. The construction cost was $60,655.10. Other costs in the amount of $28,530.00 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement cost of $89,185.10. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be financed by the City's Storm Sewer Trunk Fund. 5. Storm Sewer Lateral Improvement Storm sewer lateral improvements were installed with Johnny Cake Ridge Road to provide street drainage and also to serve as extensions for developer installed storm sewer. Storm sewer installation from CBMH-104 to BP-35 was oversized to handle flow from south of Diffley Road to Pond BP-35. The construction cost was $272,229.60. Other costs in the amount of $128,047.14 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and assessable cost of $400,276.74 to the benefited parcels. The feasibility report called for this improvement to be 100% assessed using linear and area methods. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The unit assessment rate computed in the following manner: Storm Sewer Lateral Construction Cost $272,229.60 Less Costs associated with over sizing from CBMH-104 to BP35 59.922.10 Storm Sewer Construction Cost $212,307.50 Add other costs @47.04% 99,861.91 Improvement Cost-Unit Method $312,169.41 4 16, ;2 IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $312,169.41 313 Units $997.35/Unit The area assessment rate computed in the following manner: Storm Sewer Lateral Construction Cost $272,229.60 Less Storm sewer costs for unit method 212.307.50 Costs associated with over sizing from CBMH-104 to BP35 $59,922.10 Add other costs @47.04% 28,285.23 Improvement Cost-Area Method $88,107.33 IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $88,107.33 1,013,438.4 Sq. Ft. $.086939/Sq. Ft. 6. Johnny Cake Ridge Road Street Improvement Johnny Cake Ridge Road was built to a 36-foot width with transitions for right turn, left turn and thru lanes at the intersection of Diffley Road and right turn and thru lanes at the intersection of Deerwood Drive. The construction cost was $336,821.17. Other costs in the amount of $158,428.71 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement and cost of $495,249.88. The feasibility report called for a Residential Street Equivalent to be assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The over sizing costs will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: Street Construction Cost $336,821.17 Less Over Sizing Street Costs-Cross-Section 137,426.62 Striping 6,551.30 Signal conduit 1.250.00 $191,593.25 Add other costs @47.04% 90,125.46 Residential Equivalent Improvement $281,718.71 IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $281,718.71 313 Units $900.04/Unit 5 I T 7. Turn Lane Improvements Right and left turn lanes on Diflley Road and Deerwood Drive at their intersection with Johnny Cake Ridge Road were required as a condition of development. The construction cost was $73,971.63. Other costs in the amount of $34,793.63 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement cost of $108,765.26. The feasibility report called for 80% of this improvement cost to be assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $108,765.26 X.8 313 Units $277.99/Unit 8. Trail Improvement Bituminous trails that are 8 feet wide were constructed on the east and west side of Johnny Cake Ridge Road. The construction cost was $35,935.90. Other costs in the amount of $16,902.97 were allocated to the construction costs. This results in an improvement cost of $52,838.87. The feasibility report called for 50% of this improvement cost to be assessed using a linear method. A unit method will be used instead of the linear method. The assessment rate was computed in the following manner: IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSMENT RATE $52,838.87 X.5 313 Units $84.41/Unit C. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments are proposed for a term of 15 years as was proposed in the feasibility study. The interest rate is 7.0% per annum on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES (RESPONSIBILITY) IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT CITY IMPROVEMENT COST REVENUE (RESPONSIBILITY) Sanitary sewer lateral $212,664.40 $212,664.72 $32 Water main 170,717.99 110,617.33 (60,100.66) Service pairs 20,230.89 20,231.60 .71 Trunk storm sewer 89,185.10 (89,185.10) Lateral storm sewer 400,276.74 400,277.32 .58 Street 495,249.88 281,712.52 (213,537.36) Street-turn lanes 108,765.26 87,010.87 (21,754.39) Bituminous trail 52,838.87 26,420.33 (26,418.54) TOTAL $1,549,929.13 $1,138,934.69 ($410,994.44) 6 8~ The City's responsibility will be financed by transfers from the following City Trunk Funds. Trunk Fund Amount Water $60,100.66 Storm Sewer 89,185.10 Major Street 261,710.29 Total $410,996.05 Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed R 'ew ;F O - M44~~ 4!L Public Works Department Finn epartment ~4Z8, ( Dated g'Z~ ~o l Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Daugherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I 7 9 T w p C V M M N W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N pp pp ~~pp p ff~~1 Q~pp X1`"'11 N NNN N JJw -5 ANOnaD MMcnm DMMM~MMMCpMMMBMMMN In MMMBMMMMMMMM MMMMV)cn V M M OO MnAA NnnI~MAhh hr nO1~hnMP, r- r- A Ann Onn 1~nA r:nA1: A/: A1~nAhAI~ Of cnaO~OOOaDOOO W OOOOOO OOOCDOOO~OOOO O O OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO r C') @~ O - - fDv M v - CDv v ~..r v r. - .r O O v v a' LLZ~ J } N ~ eQ-f~f W NO~ttp~ppp ltttOW[pppf 0101 W V W O1 W ~iA~O1~~ W W W W In 010101 ~ W W O1~° O1 ~iA iAWW ~O?~0/O1 W W W W W W JO m cm 9)Y.- P- C4 C4 C-4 N cr) en In M C.) In cn 11 In m m a a fV fV V w or LL O p 0 r O_m N W W _W ~N <V NaDNNN1nNNN~NNN SNNNALV NNQNNNNBNNtV NNNN It N N F O ^ C4 co ^5~ n C14 CD A t. P. 1- n n A 1(n~ 1A~ ~nj 1(n~ 1h~ 11~~ h yh~ f ~ 1h1 1 ~ n 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ A 1 ~ 1n~ g 1.- 1~ 1h~ 1W~ I A P, 11, O P, 11.- I, fop r- P. n W P- 1- A ~ (A7 1 O A f+l l'l er1 M eel fn cq V) V) I~ cn 0) c~ cq W 8 r- C4 R M tiS i$ N e+f k e`C6 Vi Vi C6 C6 C6 Vi r- (6 Vi C6 7 t9 t'7 th e~f i i~ 8 M e7lh i~ t+f aD 1+l vi f7 V; Vi V; ri In, R 0l. . g N O 8 o 0. a va~aY. lnee•iagav vv:ree~aavvavvaq " 88888888 In:;:;:;!R a~:rve$a 1 11 N N 011 O I& 11 a an F N tp p pp pppppppO~ Wp W Cp~ p~pp pp Wp1 WW W~I ~~pp WpI WW p yy WQ1 0~ pp~ WW WW W yW Wy Cn Oy~ ~~0~~8~iA Op~~~O~~OD W CD <A~iA W iA~ N aD 00000000 W W iA~O1~OD~070?iA OMC~0/01801~~~01 W ~NCR II OOOOOOOOPhn~1~nA Ann W A n A C h n An n AA mA h r- A O A A A n n A A n P I: Ann r- r.- l`hA .1a II P, An AnA NIA nr- Ann AAA 8 p AnnA 1-nA/A nnAAAAAnAAAA nnAnnA Q 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N o Z II a' 11 J 0- ~8~3g~Sg88~~~ 8;8 8.3. ~i88888888~g88~~~gS.S.S. a. 848880333a8ggags. a 11 ~ F' U u ~1 IN+1 O Z II ~ to U C4 to C4 co ~ a u <a ii `41n'°'~Ofifi$IQo'i$88i~y$yi$i$Pa 888°$8i$y§i$i$8WNWfy888°8888i~ai~i$i$8i$$8i$i$8i$i$8 II N N N N l0 M P/ O a' 11 N a N If p p p p p p p p p y a '~pp ~~++11 p a p e~ a a y a a a s y 11 Of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ aD ib a a a N y S . . ~ CCpD . a . . iy0 0 t0 . ~ OD (O CD aD OD aD . CD OD . ~ OZ N y00000000 Y O~ 7sa-sa1Dga3 t0°l aspay-sasssas saaaaa aIs asses U) a' 11 $ iD ~D ~D I U) a 3 11 " 8888888SaZ:;R! vc"~Yaa~:►va8•i<anaavI~evaa8avavva~v~vava<avvv Q II nGOG GOCO01'f M 1e)'~ en f7 e'> W 0) eu'~7 Oe7 M) M14 0 ~ 14 Y 11 AAA A iq 10 n O Z 11 00 ~ ~ a ii 3 n g8YY~333 IIm88888888S83Spgp$3X833~XOf d N CVOOOOOOOOrA r rE0An W ^ ° r r nN(M AAAO 0^a a QmCA n WA AOCD 'm ^^Q 11 co m ID to mco n 10 m co 01DAID m Coco <CD OCAVOW O 0000000wo0 c occ( mwo L) IM O 2 u N N F J a N m u w 88 SS og N cc v♦ air Q M M WW QQw[ww yw~Y~[C Ill Ill ww Ill wvy7~ y7Ill IyY,~lllGlIll 7wwr~wY w L*yU 7vyw~ Ill y*w[~.LU w 7yW w-wIll Ill Ill Ill Ill Illll 7Yyw~wIllll IllllIll w Ill w I7}Ill Ill wIll Ill Ill Ill Ill U.1 N~ NN N~ ~ 7575 C.J V (.7U ~tlU~V U~ V UU VUUCJ~U~~~~~ V ~ V CJ~ VCl V ~CJ~V V~~~~/ V V l7 5 5 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m wwwwww~ N N N N in ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O n If7 A H H h HH n IA n IC1 IA N Y7 IA M HUNS N 9 C4 9H jjj LU SESSS co co Q N e Ae~~ n n n n n A A n n n A A n n n n A A n A n e nd n n A n A I. n n A n A n A n A n ddooddgo-ododddoddddddoooooooddodododoooodooddod--- 0 c I W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N~y O J W Mclq l7 V1 !+f q-ciclcll7q Pf co e'e7 MQ7 ~e7 co roe? /h MOf N~~yyNNN N N N N N N~~pppp OOpp poppooppppO o P'f Pl PS Pl l'O !+f l+7 P1 0) Of M P/1Cl Ot G1 01 O D/ O Ol Ol O/ Q p U AAAAAAfAnn1~1- 1- ri,h1~1~Anh~AAhl~nh/~1~A1~nnhA-nPnARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRt~ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O e O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N 0 ~ tai 2 O O~~~ IC m~ ID ro m m ro~~ 1 p~~~ c p m a p~~ c D~ m a D m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m a D (O tO . r va0aeaa<Oaaeea0avaavvv V eevOYOOOO V OO~I of vo0 aD n~er~~n°nD e°+Ae+°n~ermy t°+nt+°n~ Wm0 lN~1~PNftNieNfeN+llN7~MMMMMmI+NltN9MC0,4m mlN7lN7C.))l+NftN7MPN'f A MCl) C+NfMM(M,, MC, e~t ehie eot eolhrfaf a2CL Ill d' LL 01 ~ f` A A n f: A A A h h A A n h h h r-r- r- ~ h I. I, h ~ h t- /r- I, N N P. 1, r- 1- N f, h h 1, h h N 1, w~t~~ic~t~e~e~e~+ t+~ehic~t~e~v~r~t~t~t~t~ehie~t~e~+e~r~e~r~t~e~t~+ e~e~e~ie~e~e~t~e~e~e~e~c~r~e'ten 68 Cd C6 C6 C6 C6 ci C6 cli ri vi vi C6 C6 vi C6 C6 0i vi vi vi vi vi V) m vi C6 m C4 C6 V) V) C6 C6 C6 C6 C6 vi vi vi vi vi vi vi vi V6 C6 vi ri vi vi 6 6 C6 M C.) 4" ~r IL ii a:r.iveavavvaevavv~~.i~vaavaa~iva~~~~eiv~eaaaaav•iaeaeavvaca e ~a ° ~a~a~~ag~~~aga~a~~~~aga~a~a~~a~a~ag~~~~ag~a~aga~~a$aga~a~~~~ag~ag~a~aga~a~agag~~ag~a~~a~ ~ U 11 Oz u i ra a r n 11 h h P ri h h n IA h n IA n n A A A A A A A A A A A P" A N* A h n A P P A A n A A P--' A n A A A A A^ n n n A n n J 11 A A A A A n n n A n A n A A A A A A A A A n A n A A A n n n n n n A A A A A n A A n A A A A A PIN A n A n A n A U„ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Oz" r d' It J d 11 r 11 g83~3$gggB. .S$gSSgg3. g8g8g88S3S3$.BgSgSg83.88gSgS3gg8g~8 o z a ii e~ e~ e~ e~ t~ e+~ ehi ehi a thi ehi r~ Ciii (ii e~ rmi e~. . . . . (i . C ~i, c~ 11 /v r~ A A n A A A A A n A n n n A A A n n n n n n n n n n n A A A A A A n A n n n A A A A n n n A n n n n n A A r C u au ii a _ 11 U r U ii Oz U) r a ii iiavevvvvavvavvice+aaaeaveaavaaav~rveevv~e~ava~~~~~a~va~veev oZ - (L ~ a 3 if 6aa0"igigimaagiaacim gi a44 ci oi6a 4a44 4 giWgi"ics "ia6~ agigi.gia"igi~44 U n A n n n A A F, A P, A n A I, m n A n n A A n A n A n A A A A A A A A A A A P6 A 1 D A OD it A A A n A Q It m m m m m m m m m 10 m m m m m m m Amm m m m Am m m mm nm m m t O mA 1- Am m mm A No m m m m No m m m t O m m m Q D m m m OZa a N a z►=rf-rrrr~ttttLt~ttt~ttttttttttttttttttPttrtrrrtttrr-rrtrrr W W W W W W W W W w w W W W W W w w w w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W Will W W W W W W W W W W W W m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m lD m m m m m m m m m m m m m 0l m m t0 m m m m m m m m m m 000 00000 00000000 000000000000000000000000000 N N t7 N t7 th HIMMI N t7 M M N 0 N m 9 29 ;g R 91 WZ44444NN24 _ ~aj W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N lV N N N N N N N N ~ A~ n n A n n r A~ A~^ A A^ A^~ n n r A~ A A~^ A~^ A A~ A n~ n n A r~ A~ n A r r r A r n A~~ n aaooaaao ao as i r Luj w 8$$$$$$$88$88$$8$$$$$$$8$$$$$$$$8$$$888$88$8$88$$$88$$$$ fld) ~RRRR~RRRRRR£~RRRRRRR~~RRRl~RR~ZRt~RRR~RRRRRRRRRS~R~RRRRRRRRR oQ~ LL < LL Z > 2 m m _m m m m m m m m m m m m m _m _m m m m m_ m m m m m m m m m m _m _m m _m m m m m_ m m _m m m m m m m _m m m m m m m _m a0 O CO a0 aG a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 aG CO a0 a0 a0 a0 ap a0 a0 a0 a0 m IC "OP a n0 00P I m m ao aC aC ao ao aC aC ao aC ao a0 m a0 a0 a0 a0 a0 m a0 a0 a0 AAnrnnnAAAAAnnnA~AAnnr~AAn~~AAAn~n~Anrnnrn~~nnn~rnnAr Wa-pp `c~colnARARr Ar&,)c"li`2ie` 2 a~w a LL pppp Q~pp pppp Q~pp ~~pp ~~pp N N N N N N N N N N N N N N fV N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N I~ n h h A 1~ A 1~ A A IA n r 1~ r^ f` n~ A A h h f` h h h h h h n r h 1~ h r r 1~ 1~ n I{ n~ 1~ A n 1~ 1~ n 1~ ~ A 1~ A w~ c~e~c~t~it+~ l ~i RRig R R R R R R R R R R ~"R RRRRR RRRRR emnrmie+M9t g M M M M C6 c6c6 vi C6 C6 v; C6 V6 06 vi c6C6 ci vi C6 C6 Ili C6 CL N< a~ Y v V< a a a R V ~i:r a ~ v ~ e e~ v e a e~ a v v f f f f f f f f a e a a v e~ v ~ s v a v a v a v a a F U u OZ_° J ~ a' 11 a b p~ Q1 .Q.1 a 11 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O Z II CL N H n °Ix a U) u e~ c~ r~ e~+ e~+ c~+ chi e~+ lc~ chi chi 10 A A A A m en -j a ii 888888888888888gu'a8888888888885/'~'n88~'a8888~1'~'888888~'n888~n'88888 H U i y a rn u U ~ U ii OZ y ~ per, ii 3 e v v a v v v v v v v a v a v e v v a v a a e a v e v v v a a v v a e e v a e v v v e a a a a a a e v Y O Z ii ~ a 11 11 CD CDdQ~~~~ ~ C7i0001~~~QI~~QQ QIQ CD~~~OI Ol QCD ClQ~ W O/ W W W OjQ~~ ~~~~Q~QO ~Ol~ Q O1 a 11 A r n n n n r r n n n A I, A A A n A A A A A A n n A A A A r A r A n n n r n A A A n n n n r n A A P, A A A H U 11 o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m to o mo m m m m m m m m m m m m 00000 m m m m m m Z- IL VJ N w Z Z $ Z Z Z Z z Z Z Z Z z z z $ z$ Z Z Z Z Z z Z~~~1_-~f-~-~►-~~~~-F-HHHHHFHHHI-FHFHHHHHFHH!_~FF-fFI-f-F~~-~~~~~F_►=~~~ Zxxsxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxsxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx O v v v~ v a v a e v a~ a v v a< a a a~ v v e a a a a a~ a a~ e a e v v a a v e v a a a e a v a e a a a a v wwwwwwwwwIwwwwwwwwwwIwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwIwwwwwwwwwww mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 000000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 In 1lf N fn N fn 1(1 N /n N /n IA N fn ~ N M I N N N 1n N N IfI N $ O m m m I- m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m n n n N n n r r n r n r r A A A A A A A A n r A n n n n A r r r n r n n A n n A n n A n 'N A A n A r A A r r cn fn fn In In fn cn en of to ' to to a~`v~"~v3`I~ n"r3 c"31"~`~' u"~ U'? ~to 00 o~doo d^'doo~ I W s a g s a laiz> ao~ OOD ~o 7 7 f I, CID a of) wma w C IL 8 LL p N N N m a °g ~ U 11 C R Q d 11 H N Q Q Q 11 Af`O a II N 'N N O F- U H OD a u Y a a i i 8O O O8 N p O z 11 m ~ ~ ~ N it (A 11 .1~ i; ~p p~p~a n Qa 11 OD OI OI N It O Z 11 /n d ii (Al N Ja d II ~ ~ ~ N V ~ U ° Ri Oz y ~ a 11 a°R"'Eg ~ aN 3 ~a ii mmm~ N ag ir It aN to N W °sss D~av WWW c w mma0 00~ US C4 C4 O m A Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting G. PROJECT 797, LETENDRE 1ST & 2ND ADDN - STREET OVERLAY FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 797 (Letendre 151 & 2nd Additions - Street Overlay) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 797 provided for the bituminous overlay of the streets within the Letendre V & 2°d Additions, including Letendre Street, Heritage Lane and the Donald Avenue cul-de-sac, in northwest Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report. • The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on September 4, 2001, with a public hearing scheduled for October 2 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. The final assessments are approximately 22% less than the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 20, 2001. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners (46 single-family, 1 commercial/ industrial, and 5 high density residential properties) informing them of this public hearing. A neighborhood meeting prior to this Final Assessment hearing was not held due to the reduction in assessment from the original estimated amounts and the low attendance (2 people representing 2 properties) at the initial project neighborhood meeting in February. No objections have been received to date. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages through;? . i FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT HEARING DATES NUMBER - 797 ASSESSMENT - October 2, 2001 NAME - Letendre 1st Addition IMPROVEMENT - February 20.2001 Mill and Overlav IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED F.R.=Feasiblity Report FINAL F.R FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk 13 Lateral ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral ® Surfacing Single 458.95 654 /Lot ❑ Service High Density Resi 6.42 6.76 /F_F. C/I 8.55 9.02 /F_F. ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ Trail/Sidewalk SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San Sewer ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO.OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERMS RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $46,360 F.R. $62,360 F.R. 01-01 52 5 Year 7.00% $36.232.67 $77,834.47 COMMENTS: t city of eagan MEMO MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall DATE: March 21, 2001 SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll Project No.797 Letendre 1st Addition Street Overlay The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on February 20, 2001 ordered Project 797. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are mill and overlay of existing streets and replacement of curb and gutter. In the feasibility study, it was proposed to assess the improvements using a lot unit method for single-family properties, and linear methods for other property types. This assessment roll is prepared using the methods presented at the public hearing. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract No. 01-01, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 2, 2001. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. I. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $87,735.43 paid to the contractor for the construction of the following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling in the amount of $26,331.71 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $114,067.14. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I and they are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement. CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT Street resurfacing $52,346.43 $15,710.54 $68,056.97 $80,690 Curb repair 35,389.00 10,621.17 46,010.17 28,030 TOTAL $87,735.43 $26,331.71 $114,067.14 $108,720 2 n;? H. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Overlay The cost of the street overlay improvement was computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED - - - - - --i - ITEM-------------------------- --UNIT QTY PRICE - COST Moblization LS. 1 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 Mill bituminous surface Sq. Yd. 6,020 .78 4,695.60 Bituminous mat. for tack coat Gal. 750 1.50 1,125.00 Type 41 Wear Course Ton 1,258.90 26.75 33,675.58 Traffic control L. S. 1 500.00 500.00 Repair water valve top box Each 2 175.00 350.00 Adjust water valve box Each 8 125.00 1,000.00 Adjust manhole casting Each 20 175.00 3,500.00 4" Double Solid Yellow Line L. F. 250.00 1.50 375.00 4" Solid White Line L. F. 167.00 .75 125.25 SUBTOTAL $52,346.43 Other costs @30.01% 15,710.54 Mill and Overlay Cost $68,056.97 A. Commercial and Industrial Property The improvement and assessment rates for the commercial industrial property classification was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $68,056.97 7,956.54 F. F. $8.55/F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $8.55/F.F. X 100% $8.55/F.F. 3 l9'~ ~ 1 B. High Density Residential Property The improvement and assessment rates for the public facility property classification was computed using: TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $68,056.97 7,956.54 F.F. $8.55/F.F. IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $8.55/F.F. X 75% $6.42/F.F. C. Low Density Residential Property Assessment Rate The improvement cost for the low-density residential property classification was computed using: IMPROVEMENT COST CONSTRUCTION $52,346.43 Less : 4" Double Solid Line (375.00) 4" Solid White Line (125.25) Adjusted Improvement Cost 51,846.18 Other Costs @ 30.01 % 15,560.40 Improvement cost for Low Density Residential 67,406.58 Assessable Frontage 7,956.52 F.F. Improvement Rate $8.47/F.F. Improvement Cost $67,406.58 Less: Costs for C/I Property 247.67 F.F @$8.47/F.F. (2,097.26) Costs for High Density Residential 2,100.45 F.F @$8.47/F.F. (17,790.81) Non-assessable frontage 625.05 F.F. @$8.47/F.F. (5,294.17) Improvement Cost for Low Density Residential $42,223.84 /9 TOTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $42,223.84 46 Lot Units $917.90/ Lot Unit IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $917.90/ Lot Unit X 50% $458.95/Lot Unit 2. Curb and Gutter replacement The cost to replace damaged curb and gutter amounted to $35,389.00. Other costs in the amount of $10,621.17 were allocated resulting in a replacement cost of $46,010.17. This improvement will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels. D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments for this project have a term of 5 years with interest charged at an annual interest rate of 7.00 % on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES/(RESPONSIBILITIES) IMPROVEMENT CITY'S IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSMENT (RESPONSIBILITY) Streets Resurfacing $68,056.97 $36,232.67 $(31,824.30) Curb Replacement 46,010.17 (46,010.17) TOTAL $114,067.14 $36,232.67 $(77,834.47) The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements. Major Street Fund $77,834.47 Total $77,834.47 5 r Gerald R. Wobschall Reviewed Revie ed a - rn 4~ 4L Public Works Department Finance Dep ent Dated Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Dougherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I GRW 6 9/10/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 1 ST797 PER FAVORABLE TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE] PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE IDENT# DIVISION NAME 10-00900-010-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-00900-021-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-00900-031-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-00900-032-50 SECTION 9 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-27500-040-02 FOX RIDGE 4020.14 4,020.14 4230 209.86 10-32375-010-01 HELEN KENNEDY ADDITION 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-41300-010-02 ROBERT KARATZ 513.60 513.60 0 (513.60) 10-41300-020-02 ROBERT KARATZ 545.70 545.70 0 (545.70) 10-41300-030-02 ROBERT KARATZ 4675.17 4,675.17 5720 1,044.83 10-41300-120-01 ROBERT KARATZ 3248.78 3,248.78 3410 161.22 10-44900-020-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-020-02 LETENDRE #1 917.90 917.90 654 (263.90) 10-44900-042-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-044-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-051-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-053-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-061-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-070-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-080-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-082-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-091-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-104-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-111-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-121-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-121-02 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-140-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-150-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44900-170-01 LETENDRE #1 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-011-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-020-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-022-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-031-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-032-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-040-03 LETENDRE #2 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-44901-050-03 LETENDRE #2 171.00 171.00 180 9.00 10-48000-010-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-020-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-030-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-040-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-050-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-060-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-070-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-080-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-090-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-100-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-110-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-120-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-130-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-140-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-150-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-48000-160-01 MC RAE 458.95 458.95 654 195.05 10-77200-010-01 TRANSPORT AMERICA HEADQUARTERS AC 1946.58 1,946.58 2735 788.42 36232.67 36,232.67 45705 9,472.33 aa~ Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting H. PROJECT 798, CANTERBURY FOREST/WEDGEWOOD VADDITIONS STREET RECLAMATION FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To close the public hearing and approve the final assessment roll for Project 798 (Canterbury Forest/Wedgewood 1st Additions - Street Reclamation) and authorize its certification to Dakota County for collection. FACTS: • Project 798 provided for the bituminous resurfacing of the streets within the Canterbury Forest/ Wedgewood V Additions, including Tiffany Circle, Tiffany Place, Tiffany Court, Tiffany Point, Wedgewood Lane (North and South) and Wedgewood Drive, in south-central Eagan, as outlined and discussed in the feasibility report. • The final assessment roll was presented to the City Council on September 4, 2001, with a public hearing scheduled for October 2 to formally present the final costs associated with this public improvement to the affected benefiting properties. The final assessments are approximately 13% less than the estimate contained in the feasibility report presented at the public hearing held on February 20, 2001. • All notices have been published in the legal papers and sent to all affected property owners informing them of this public hearing. An informational meeting was held on September 26 to address all property owners' questions or concerns and provide any additional information of interest. Of the 143 parcels (R-1 single-family property) being assessed, no one attended the meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • Final Assessment Report, pages through . a03 FINAL ASSESSMENT HEARING PROJECT HEARING DATES NUMBER - 798 ASSESSMENT - October 2. 2001 NAME - Canterbury Forest and IMPROVEMENT- February 20.2001 Wedgewood First Additions Street Reconstruction IMPROVEMENTS INSTALLED AND/OR ASSESSED F.R =Feasibility Report FINAL F.R FINAL F.R RATE RATE UNITS RATE RATE UNITS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER ❑ Trunk ❑ Trunk ❑ Lateral ❑ Lateral ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk WATER STREET ❑ Trunk ❑ Gravel Base ❑ Lateral la Surfacing Single 1364.69 1563 /Lot ❑ Service ❑ Lat. Benefit/trunk ❑ WAC ❑ C/I Equiv. ❑ Trail/Sidewalk SERVICES STREET LIGHTS ❑ Water & San Sewer ❑ Installation ❑ Energy Charge CONTRACT NO.OF INTEREST AMOUNT CITY NO. PARCELS TERM RATE ASSESSED FINANCED $223.540 F.R. $142.830 F.R. 01-01 143 10 Years 7.00% $195.150.67 $125.713.94 COMMENTS: ~D ~ 1 MEMO city of eagan MEMO TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gerald R. Wobschall DATE: September 17, 2001 SUBJECT: Final Assessment Roll Project No.798 Canterbury Forest and Wedgewood First Additions Street Reconstruction The City Council at the conclusion of the public hearing on February 20, 2001 ordered Project 798. According to the feasibility report, the following improvements were to be constructed and/or assessed. The improvements are reconstruction of existing streets and replacement of curb and gutter. In the feasibility study, it was proposed to assess the improvements using a lot unit method for single-family properties. This assessment roll is prepared using the methods presented at the public hearing. Construction of the improvements was accomplished under Contract No. 01-01, which is complete. The assessment hearing is scheduled for October 2, 2001. The following information was used in the preparation of the assessment roll. 1. PROJECT COST The construction cost includes the amount of $268,613.61 paid to the contractor for the construction of the following detailed improvements. Other costs which consist of engineering, design, contract management, inspections, financing, legal, bonding, administration, and other totaling in the amount of $52,251.01 were incurred resulting in an improvement and project cost of $320,864.62. The detail of these other costs is provided on Schedule I and they are allocated to the improvements constructed in order to determine the cost of each improvement. CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT FEASIBILITY IMPROVEMENT COST COSTS COST REPORT Street reconstruction $217,829.11 $42,372.35 $260,201.46 $298,050 Curb repair 50,784.50 9,878.66 60,663.16 68,320 TOTAL $268,613.61 $52,251.01 $320,864.62 $366,670 CO~ II. ASSESSMENTS A. TRUNK ASSESSMENTS No trunk assessments for utilities were proposed in the feasibility report, therefore, none are proposed in this assessment roll. B. STREET IMPROVEMENTS 1. Street Reconstruction The cost of the street reconstruction improvement was computed using the following unit prices and quantities: UNIT EXTENDED -----------------ITEM ------UNIT QTY PRICE ------------COST Mobilization LS. 1 $3,875.00 $3,875.00 Reclaim Bituminous pavement Sq. Yd. 28,850 .67 19,329.50 Remove reclaimed material Cu. Yd. 3,149 10.50 33,064.50 Type 41 wear course Ton 2,125.80 31.35 66,643.83 Type 32 base course Ton 2,942.57 27.25 80,185.03 Tack coat Gal 1,455 1.25 1,818.75 Traffic control L. S. 1 827.50 827.50 Adjust water valve box Each 11 175.00 1,925.00 Adjust manhole casting Each 36 250.00 9,000.00 Water M Gal 16 25.00 400.00 Street sweeper Hour 8 95.00 760.00 SUBTOTAL $217,829.11 Other costs @19.45% $42,372.35 Reconstruction Cost $260,201.46 . Low-Density Residential Property The improvement and assessment rates for the low density residential classification was computed using: 'OTAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSABLE COST UNITS IMPROVEMENT RATE $260,201.46 143 Lot units. $1,819.59 IMPROVEMENT RATE ASSESSABLE PORTION ASSESSMENT RATE $1,819.59 X 75% $1,364.69/Lot ao06 2. Curb and Gutter replacement The cost to replace damaged curb and gutter amounted to $50,784.50. Other costs in the amount of $9,878.66 were allocated resulting in a replacement cost of $60,663.16. This improvement will be financed by the City's Major Street Fund. C. ASSESSMENT SPREAD The special assessments are spread to the abutting and adjacent parcels. D. ASSESSMENT TERMS The assessments for this project have a term of 10 years with interest charged at an annual interest rate of 7.00 % on the unpaid balance. III. CITY REVENUES/(RESPONSIBILITIES) IMPROVEMENT CITY'S IMPROVEMENT COST ASSESSMENT (RESPONSIBILITY) Streets Reconstruction $260,201.46 $195,150.67 $(65,050.79) Curb Replacement 60,663.16 (60,663.16) TOTAL $320,864.62 $195,150.67 $(125,713.95) The following funds will provide financing for the listed improvements. Major Street Fund $125,713.95 Total $125,713.95 Gerald R Wobschall Reviewed Review 4V-L--,r1- . 12JZ266tr,,3 e-'-) Public Works Department Finance epartment 5.v 4- eo r 9- 7t 0 Dated Dated cc: Thomas A. Colbert, Director of Public Works Mike Dougherty, City Attorney Sue Sheridan, Accountant I GRW 0~o 9/7/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 1 ST798 PER FAVORABLE TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE] PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE IDENT# DIVISION NAME 10-16350-010-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-010-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-020-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-020-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-030-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-030-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-040-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-040-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-050-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-050-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-060-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-060-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-070-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-070-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-080-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-080-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-090-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-090-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-100-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-100-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-110-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-110-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-120-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-120-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-130-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-130-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-140-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-140-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-150-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-150-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-160-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-160-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-170-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-170-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-180-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-180-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-190-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-190-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-200-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-200-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-210-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-210-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-220-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-220-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-230-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-230-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-240-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-240-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-250-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-250-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-260-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-260-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-270-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-270-02 CANTERBURY FOREST ao~ 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 i 917/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 2 ST798 PER FAVORABLE TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE] PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE IDENT# DIVISION NAME 10-16350-280-01 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-280-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-290-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-16350-300-02 CANTERBURY FOREST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-010-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-010-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-010-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-010-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-010-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-020-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-020-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-020-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-020-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-020-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-030-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-030-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-030-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-030-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-030-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-040-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-040-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-040-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-040-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-040-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-050-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-050-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-050-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-050-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-050-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-060-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-060-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-060-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-060-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-060-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-070-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-070-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-070-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-070-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-070-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-080-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-080-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-080-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-080-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-080-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-090-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-090-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-090-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-090-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-090-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-100-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-100-02 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-100-03 WEDGWOOD 1 ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-100-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-100-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST ~Dg 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 9/7/2001 COMBINED ASSESSMENT ROLL 3 ST798 PER FAVORABLE TOTAL PROPERTY FEASIBILITY [UNFAVORABLE] PROPERTY PRINCIPAL TOTAL REPORT VARIANCE IDENT# DIVISION NAME 10-83550-110-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-110-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-110-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-110-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-120-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-120-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-120-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-120-05 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-130-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-130-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-130-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-140-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-140-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-140-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-150-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-150-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-150-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-160-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-160-03 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-160-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-170-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-170-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-180-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-180-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-190-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-190-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-200-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-200-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-210-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-210-04 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-220-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-230-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-240-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-250-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 10-83550-260-01 WEDGWOOD 1ST 1364.69 1,364.69 1563 198.31 195150.67 195,150.67 223509 28,358.33 ago I f Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting OLD BUSINESS A. PROJECT 751, SOUTH DODD RD. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Reaffirm/amend the scope of the Project 751, So. Dodd Rd. (Streets and Utilities) regarding the Red Pine Lane extension alignment and, if appropriate, authorize design revisions and the re-advertisement for the solicitation of bids. FACTS: • Project 751 provides for the installation of utilities, trails and the urban upgrade of Dodd Rd from Cliff Rd. to approximately 600 ft north of 120`x' St. and a connection from Dodd Rd. to Hwy 3 at the intersection of Red Pine Lane. Numerous neighborhood meetings and public hearings have been held over the past several years trying to satisfactorily define the scope of the proposed improvements. A consensus from all affected and/or interested property owners could not be reached. • At the April 3, 2001 public hearing, the Council approved the project consisting of a 28 foot wide street with an 8 foot off-street trail on the west side; no on-street parking; the installation of a cul-de-sac on Dodd Rd. south of Farm Rd. and an extension of Red Pine Lane from Highway 3 connecting to Dodd Rd. near the Hall Street intersection (Hall St. Alignment). • On June 19, the detailed plans for Contract 01-11 were approved for bid solicitation and easement acquisition authorized. • On August 7, the Council received the bids and considered the award of the contract. Based on the objections from MnDOT and their refusal to grant the City a permit for the proposed connection between Dodd Rd. and Hwy 3, the Council rejected the bids, canceled the contract and authorized a revision to the plans with a new bid opening scheduled for January 31, 2002. The Council also directed staff to request Rosemount to install a 4-way stop on Dodd Rd. at 120th St. (But win Rd.) Rosemount's response did not support this requested all-way stop at this intersection located entirely in their jurisdiction. • Since that Council meeting, neighbors have contacted Councilmembers addressing their preferences for the proposed alignment of the extension of Red Pine Lane to Dodd Rd. There are still strongly opposing positions from various neighbors regarding the ultimate alignment. MnDOT has stated that they will only approve the alignment that basically follows the platted right of way for Carol Street if Dodd Rd. is closed with a cul-de-sac. This is to accommodate their requirement for the most direct connection between Hwy 3 and Dodd Rd to replace the lost intercommunity connector and reliever that Dodd Rd. would provide. • 7 years ago on August 2, 1994 the Council held a public hearing to consider the vacation of Carol Street as part of the development consideration of the Waterview Cove Addition. After considerable discussion, the Council retained the Carol St. right of way and directed the developer of the Waterview Cove Add. to modify it's plat to accommodate the future Carol Street improvement. The Council also directed staff to develop various Concept Plans for the future street alignments in this area. • On August 16, 1994 the Council subsequently approved an alignment that extends Red Pine Lane along the current Carol Street right of way to the Waterview Cove stub street. The remainder of Carol Street between the Stub street and Dodd Rd. would be vacated. This earlier proposal would meet with MnDOT's permit requirement for a 4' intersection to Hwy 3 at Red Pine Lane. • Residents along Waterview Cove presented an alternative alignment between the "Hall St." and "Carol St." proposals for consideration. This modification will not meet MnDOT's requirement. ISSUES: • The basic question of where the Red Pine Lane extension is located is necessary for staff to proceed with detailed design plans and easement acquisition, if any. Certain alignments will require greater amounts of easement acquisition depending on its relationship to the dedicated right of way for Carol St. ATTACHMENTS: • Rosemount Stop Sign Letter, page _X-3. • Contract 01-11 alignment alternatives, page,. • So. Dodd Rd. Master Plan concept, page. • Modified Carol St. Alignment Sketch, page. r CITY OF RO S E M O U N T 2875 Cl45th{Street West Rosemount, MN \ 55068-4997 r Everything's Coming Up Rosemount!! Phone: 651-423-4411 _ Hearing Impaired 651-42 3-62 19 RECEIVEM651-423.5203 September 14, 2001 SEP 17 2001 EAGAN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Tom Colbert Public Works Director City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan MN 55122 RE: Dodd Road - Elimination of thru street and four-way stop at 120th Street Dear Tom: I presented your request to the City Council at their September 12, 2001 work session. It has been a practice of the Rosemount City Council to only install traffic control if it meets warrants. The consensus of the City Council was that this intersection would not meet the warrants for a four way stop and they are not interested in installing a four way stop at this time. Sincerely, Thomas DVurt City Administrator t~13 c O I e_ O 0 N O 2 N O ° c m o ` C a N a w Ln Z c o O a a N \ m~ m ~a ~u m ~ c \ c CO \ \ m U Cc m Ua. m =cam vm m 4(r-~ we it Ncm N c eo > o0 0 UJ W- Q 0. N blS, ; O U O o W U R I` \ 5 W U 70 ui w 0 ^O M M31A831dM w w f- i Q U ~ Q OVOb (3000 C °b0 cc ~~j °OOa a w z o 0 Z. U a z r uav~ TF+L A ILO Apr VOOT9 fl ~ ~ ti(rx,t Ro• ALTERNATIVE SIX ,0•17.94 ti Alf arm ~ I BONESTR00 AND ASSOC ~ ' " 65163b 13'11 09/27/01 10:59 9f ~ \ , 0:03,103 N0; 691 ~ t f I ' t i ' ~ ! f tt / V- T' J f.~ 'n~'aFs-qr• f t l• Q f y P i' I~ • J i oO • ~ fr• r ~h i ! s i 1 t ! t Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001, Eagan City Council B. COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE PLAN AMENDMENT, REZONING & PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - SHELTER CORP. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: To continue consideration of Shelter Corporation's applications for a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from RC (Retail Commercial) to MD (Medium Density Residential), a Rezoning/Preliminary Planned Development and a Preliminary Subdivision (Cedar Villas) to the October 16, 2001 City Council meeting. FACTS: • This item was before the Council for consideration at the September 17, 2001 meeting. • At the applicant's request, the Council continued the item to the October 2, 2001 meeting to allow the applicant time to work with staff and to address the concerns and issues raised during that meeting. • The applicant has been working to modify the development plans, however, the revised plans will not be ready for the Council's consideration on October 2, 2001. • Therefore, the applicant has requested a two-week postponement to the October 16, 2001 City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Correspondence from Jay Jensen at Shelter Corp., page ~F C=?Ii2 09/27/2001 11:59 6123328284 SHELTER CORPORATION PAGE 02/02 Curpnratc ulli San t111lUII10 % r Shelter Corpor~atiott 900 900 SCC Second AvumC Somh 8000 IN IQ w'esas:, Suire 5~ SuitO S80 Stm Antonio. TX 78250 Minneapubs. MN 55403-3325 (210', 521.7701 (612) 341-78C0 Fax (210) 524-77M Fax (612) 352.8254 Pamela Dudziak Cite- of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Fagan, Minnesota 55122-1897 Subject: Request for postponement of the Cedar Villas zoning request Dear Pam, Per our telephone conversation, we are requesting that the City Council postpone their consideration of the Cedar Villas zoning modification at the October 2, 2001 to their neat meeting on October 16, 2001. During this postponement we ate working to modify our submission to meet suggestions trade at the September 17" City Council meeting and the September 21" meeting with Council Member Carlson and staff. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerelv, Jay Jensen Senior Tice President 1 Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting Mew f3us-'re-r-S A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To approve a Conditional Use Permit to erect a single-sided 672 SF off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between I-35E and Lexington Avenue in the northwest '/4 of Section 2, subject to conditions listed in the staff report. FACTS: ➢ Adams Outdoor Advertising (AOA) is requesting to construct a single-sided, 672 SF off-premise sign on Canadian Pacific Railroad right-of-way. The proposed site is located across I-35E from the existing Delite off-premise sign. ➢ On August 7, 2001, the City Council denied AOA's request for a two-sided, 756 SF off-premise sign at the same location. Prior to adopting the Findings of Fact for Denial on August 21, 2001, the Council agreed to continue action on the Findings to allow AOA to submit a revised application. ➢ The revised application proposes a single-sided, 672 SF sign. This represents one less sign face and an 84 SF reduction in size from the original proposal. ➢ Recently, an AOA sign was removed from a site north of the former Knox Lumber property due to rezoning, platting and the current development of that property by Northern Power Products. ➢ Earlier this year, AOA requested a Code Amendment to Table A of the Sign Ordinance that would acknowledge a new sign location at the site being considered with this CUP. On May 1, 2001, the City Council decided not to direct staff to prepare said amendment. ➢ The City Council took action on May 15, 2001 to amend Table A of the Sign Ordinance to reflect changes over the past few years. ➢ The current Table A reflects the removal of the off-premise sign (and the corresponding city-wide reduction in the number of sign faces and sign square footage) just north of the Knox Lumber site and, therefore, the present request by C; g AOA represents an increase to the number of signs, number of sign faces, and the total sign square footage in the City. ➢ The Advisory Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on September 25, 2001. The APC is recommending denial of the Conditional Use Permit. ISSUES: ➢ If the Council looks favorably upon this request, action should be withheld on this item until the City Code has been amended to provide for locating off-premise signs in rights-of-way. ATTACHMENTS: (3) Draft September 25, 2001 APC Minutes, page 40"01 through OCMQR Staff Report, page Za3 through !0~ August 7, 2001 CC Minutes, page, C;? C20 I [ City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2001 Page 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING Chair Heyl opened the first public hearing of the evening regarding a Conditional Use Permit to allow a single sided off-premise pylon sign on Canadian Pacific Railway right- of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue in the NW'/< of Section 2. Senior Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff's planning report dated September 19, 2001. He noted the background and history. John Bodger, Adams Outdoor Advertising stated the proposal is similar to the earlier proposal. He discussed changes made to the application. Chair Heyl questioned the right-of-way issue that states it would need a text amendment to be allowed in the Canadian Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Mr. Bodger stated he is not aware of the right-of-way issue. He stated Adams Outdoor Advertising had one approved on the same railroad right-of-way in 1995. He stated the State of Minnesota considers the railroad property zoned as the property that borders it. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the Public Hearing and returned the discussion back to the Commission. Chair Heyl questioned City Attorney Bob Bauer about the right-of-way on the Pacific Railroad issue. City Attorney Bob Bauer stated that the right-of-way is not zoned. Member Segal moved Member Huusko seconded a motion to approve the request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 672 SF single sided off-premise pylon sign on Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue in the NW '/e of Section 2. Chair Heyl stated she will vote against the request because of numbers 1,2,3 and 4 of the requirements to add additional off-premise signage are not met. She stated the intent is to lower the number of signs throughout the City. A vote on the motion was taken. aa~ City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2001 Page 3 Aye: Huusko, Segal and Bendt Nay: Nosbush, Steininger and Heyl Motion failed. Member Segal moved, Member Steininger seconded a motion to deny the request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 672 SF single sided off-premise pylon sign on Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way, south of Hwy 55 and west of Lexington Avenue in the NW 1/4 of Section 2 due to the proposal not meeting the requirements 1,2,3 and 4 and the advice of City Attorney stating that this proposal is not permitted in a Railroad right-of-way. Member Huusko questioned if the City code was in place when the present signs were installed. Mr. Bauer stated the signs in the railroad right-of-ways are legal non-conforming uses. Member Steininger stated the City has enough billboard signage. A vote was taken. Aye: Nosbush, Segal, Bendt, Steininger and Chair Heyl Nay: Huusko aa~ ~ 1 PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 19, 2001 CASE: 02-CU-11-05-01 APPLICANT: Adams Outdoor Advertising HEARING DATE: September 25, 2001 PROPERTY OWNER: Canadian Pacific Railway PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit (Off-premise sign) LOCATION: South of T.H. 55 between I-35E and Lexington Avenue COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Railroad right-of-way ZONING: Railroad right-of-way SUMMARY OF REQUEST Adams Outdoor Advertising has requested a Conditional Use Permit to erect a single-sided 378 square foot, 40 foot high off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between I-35E and Lexington Avenue in the northwest'/. of Section 2. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Chapter 11, Section 11.40, Subdivisions 4C and 4D provide the following. Subdivision 4C states that the Planning Commission shall recommend a conditional use permit and the Council shall issue such conditional use permits only if it fords that such use at the proposed location: A. Will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the City. B. Will be harmonious with the general and applicable specific objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Code provisions. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and will not change the essential character of that area, nor substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. aa3 Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP September 25, 2001 Page 2 D. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools. E. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be hazardous or detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. F. Will have vehicular ingress and egress to the property which does not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public streets. G. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Subdivision 4D, Conditions, states that in reviewing applications of conditional use permits, the Planning Commission and the Council may attach whatever reasonable conditions they deem necessary to mitigate anticipated adverse impacts associated with these uses, to protect the value of other property within the district, and to achieve the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In all cases in which conditional uses are granted, the Council shall require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary as proof that the conditions stipulated in connection therewith are being and will be complied with. BACKGROUNDMISTORY At their regular meeting of August 7, 2001, the City Council denied the CUP and directed the City Attorney to draft Findings of Fact for Denial. The City Council denied the request after discussion amongst current and former Council members about the intent of the Sign Ordinance to reduce off-premise signage as development occurs. On August 21, 2001, at the applicant's request, the Council continued action on the Findings to allow the applicant to submit a revised application. In December of 1991, the City approved a conditional use permit to allow an advertising sign (billboard) greater than 250 square feet in area at 2867 Lexington Avenue (the Northern Power Products site). One of the conditions of approval was that such sign be removed within 60 days of the time the property is sold or developed. On April 3, 2001, the City Council approved a rezoning and Final Plat (Northern Power Products Addition) to allow the future construction of a 50,000 square foot office/warehouse upon such property. As a condition of Final Plat approval, it was stipulated that the billboard presently existing on the property must be removed. As required, the billboard in question was removed from the Northern Power Products property. Because the billboard owner (Adams Outdoor) was required to remove a billboard, the applicant is now proposing a new billboard within the Canadian Pacific Railway right-of-way approximately 2,100 feet to the north of the previous location. e~ ~ r Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP September 25, 2001 Page 3 Additionally, Table A, located in Section 4.20 of the Sign Ordinance, depicts the location, size, and surface of all billboards within the City. This table is amended from time to time to reflect changes that occur over time. The table/ordinance was most recently amended earlier this year to reflect changes made by City Council action and also the removal of the billboard previously located on the Northern Power Products property north of the former Knox Lumber site. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject property is part of the Canadian Pacific railroad corridor. The property is flat and covered with mixed weeds and grasses. Some scattered significant trees exist within the vicinity of the proposed sign location. The sign would be located south of the rail tracks, just south of TH 55. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject properties: North - TH 55/1-35E right-of-way South- Truck terminal; zoned I-1, Limited Industrial and guided IND, Limited Industrial East - I-35E right-of-way West - Canadian Pacific Railroad right-of-way/TH 55 right-of-way EVALUATION OF REQUEST Comlatibility with Surrounding Area - The subject property is bounded on the north, east and west by highway rights of way and the south by an industrial use. There is a billboard sign west of the subject site, across 1-35E. While preparing the Findings of Fact for Denial, the City Attorney noted that the Sign Ordinance stipulates that off-premise signs shall only be allowed on properties zoned for business or industrial use (right-of-way is not zoned). Therefore, the City should not allow off-premise signs in public or private rights-of-way unless the City Council determines that the City Code should be changed to allow this type of signage in rights-of-way. There are two other off-premise signs in Eagan that are located in right-of-way and they are considered legally existing non-conforming uses. As with any non-conforming use, expansion is not permitted and should these structures be damaged by more than 50%, they would not be able to be replaced. JC~50" Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP September 25, 2001 Page 4 Off-Premise Sim Requirements Use Acceptability Section 4.20 Subd. 4.C of the City Code states that off-premise business signs may only be erected upon property zoned for business or industrial use. While the subject property (railroad right-of-way) is located in an industrial area, it is not zoned for business or industrial use. A City Code text amendment would be necessary to accommodate this request. Conditional Use Permit According to Section 4.20 Subd. 4.B.3 of the City Sign Code, the owner of an existing off- premise sign may construct a new off-premise sign pursuant to a conditional use permit issued in accordance with the provisions of chapter 11 of the City Code, and under the following criteria: 1. No sign will be permitted which increases the number of signs beyond the number of signs depicted in table A (attached as an exhibit), as amended from time to time. Approval of the conditional use permit would increase the total number of off-premise business signs within the City from 11 to 12. 2. No sign shall be permitted which increases the total square footage of all signs beyond the number of total square feet depicted in table A (which follows this section), as amended from time to time. Erection of the billboard would increase the total square footage depicted on Table A from 8,086 to 8,464 square feet. 3. No sign shall be permitted which increases the total number of sign surfaces beyond the total number of sign surfaces depicted in table A (which follows this section), as amended from time to time. Approval of the conditional use permit will increase the number of sign surfaces in the City from 21 to 22. 4. The maximum square footage of a sign shall be 250 square feet; however, the city may allow a sign in excess of 250 square feet upon (i) the reduction of the total number of signs, square footage or surface areas depicted in table A (attached as an exhibit), as amended from time to time, and (ii) amendment to said table A to reflect such reduction, and (iii) further, so long as the total square footage of all signs is not increased beyond the total of sign square footage depicted in said table A, at the time of application for a new sign. G~~6 Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP September 25, 2001 Page 5 The applicant is proposing to erect a single faced sign measuring 378 square feet in area. Thus, the applicant is proposing to exceed the maximum square footage allowance by 128 square feet while not meeting the exception criteria. 5. No sign shall be located nearer to any other off-premises sign than 1,500 lineal feet on the same side of the street or 300 lineal feet on the opposite side of the street. The proposed billboard would meet the minimum 1,000 foot spacing requirement of the Sign Code existing approximately 1,800 feet east of a Delite OutdoorAdvertising sign. 6. No sign shall be located on a platted lot that contains a business sign. This provision will be satisfied 7. No sign shall be located within 300 feet of any freestanding ground sign or pylon sign. This provision will be satisfied 8. No sign shall be located within 200 feet of any residentially zoned district. This provision will be satisfied 9. No sign or any part thereof shall exceed 40 feet in height as measured from the land adjacent to the base of the sign. The proposed billboard would measure 40 feet in height. Thus, this provision will be satisfied SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The City Code states that off-premise business signs may only be erected upon property zoned for business or industrial use. While the subject property is located in an industrial area, it is not zoned for business or industrial use. The City has permitted two other off-premise signs on right-of-way and, accordingly, those two signs must be considered legally existing non-conforming uses. The City should not allow off-premise signs in public or private rights-of-way unless the City Council makes the determination that the City Code should be changed to allow this type of signage in rights-of-way. The applicant is proposing to increase the number of signs, total square footage of signs, and the number of sign-faces in the City and to exceed the maximum square footage allowed without meeting the criteria established for increasing the size. as Planning Report - Adams Outdoor Advertising CUP September 25, 2001 Page 6 This proposal appears contrary to the intent of the City Code. The City has established a process to reduce the number of off-premise signs over time whereby, billboard/off-premise signs are removed as development occurs. Further, while the "life span" of the billboard approved for the now Northern Power Products site was unknown at the time, both the City and sign owner understood, at the time of approval (approximately 10 years ago), and agreed that it would be removed upon development of the property. There are two other off-premise signs in Eagan that are located in right-of-way and they are considered legally existing non-conforming uses. As with any non-conforming use, expansion is not permitted and should these structures be damaged by more than 50%, they would not be able to be replaced. The acceptability of constructing a new off-premise sign in this area is considered a policy matter to be determined by City Officials and would require a text amendment to the City Code to allow this type of signage in rights-of-way, before action could be taken on this request. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval a Conditional Use Permit to erect a 378 square foot off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between I-35E and Lexington Avenue in the northwest of Section 2. If approved, the City Council shall direct staff to initiate a City Code amendment that would reflect the citywide increase in off-premise sign number and surfaces; and the increase in citywide sign area and the following conditions should apply: 1. The Conditional Use Permit shall be recorded within 60 days of fmal plat approval. 2. The applicant shall reduce the amount of billboard/off-premise signs, sign faces, and sign square footage elsewhere in the City so that there is no net citywide increase as a result of constructing the proposed sign. 3. A sign permit shall be obtained from the City prior to installation of the sign. 4. The sign shall not exceed 40 feet in height. 5. The sign shall not be nearer than ten feet to any property line. a )0 J~ L t FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - 02-CU-11-05-01, Railroad Right-of-Way There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling $-0- on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. At this time, there are no pending assessments on the parcel for which the conditional use permit is requested. Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The approval of the conditional use permit is not contingent upon the payment of these Connection/Availability Charges. The charges become due and payable with connection to the City's Utilities. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. No charges were computed because the railroad right-of-way will not be connected to the City's utility system. a~ O Eagan Boundary Street Centerfins, arcel Area Location Map ~ P F' Building Footprint i 1 I i i , i i f M ndo He' Use man a- i I I r . P - 4FP i Subject Site 44- 7 4 f mi sI - - 1 - / i 4t 4- }rte eQ0 ~ ~ [ 1 _ ~ 1000 0 1000 2000 Feet asses Development/Developer. Adams Outdoor Advertising Application: Conditional Use Per Case No.: 02-CU-11-05-01 Map Prepared using E w 3.1. parcel base nap data provided N by Dakota Counly Land Survey Depannunt and is current as of June 2001. City of Eagan THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY w E M. t N N E S 0 T A The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this information and are S Coenreenity Developrnant Deparnrarrt not responsible for errors or omissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Adams Outdoor Advertising Land Use Map Case No.02-CU-11-05-0 Zoning Map 1-1 Current Zoning: BP ROW Right-of-way 1-1 PD I-~ Hill 1111711111 1-1 C ~f A A coo o ON 12M F. Comprehensive Guide Plan Land Use Map 8A IND Current Land Use Designation: IND ROW Right-of-way IND IND x iND 111111 IND BP no o .oo 12M rwt ~ INI ►seN b.w m.P tier prsHd.e y D.kota cm Lana S-Y D""wb"d 0"1101. N s bM.rm.tY.n ,ml d by Clty std. City of Eagan Z, w E Community Development Department THIS MAP IS INTENDED FOR REFERENCE WE ONLY S The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarantee the accuracy of this Information. AUG ' .1 2001 August 8, 2001 Mr. Thomas Hedges City Administrator City of Eagan 3830 Pilot Knob Road Eagan, MN 55122 Re: Relocation of Adams Outdoor Advertising sign Dear Mr. Hedges: Thank you for hearing our position on the Conditional Use Permit for relocating the sign at the August 7t' City Council meeting. After careful review of the wishes of the City Council and comments made by the City Attorney, Adams would like to amend the application prior to the City Council voting on the findings of fact. Adams proposes eliminating one sign face and reducing the size by 84 square feet. This would make the application a single faced sign at 672 square feet, conforming to all of the requirements made for relocation by appeasing two of the code criteria when only one is required. We appreciate the opportunity to amend our application. (copy attached) We remain committed to work in harmony with the City of Eagan and look forward to approval of these revisions. S' erely, I ~A/ obert A. Graiziger John P. Bodger ADAMS OUTDOOR ADVERTISING .4300 BAKER ROAD, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 _ _ . . TILL: 932.936.9567 MX: 952.936.9605 NN9/.ADAMSOUTDOOR.COM 3. V . S l~ ~ o Fs~a I SSGN SSZ ~ S ~ ~ rP ~y, dace 67A CPA r yo' Td P Cr~Zf~DE f~enrl.vve ~~e S ~ n ce 6 7 A~ cO u I s Re-vt-ses aldg14( ~ocG. ~~~/loam 2,' h~`-~f -"may AdtV t2~R 10 y_ T o~ s ~ ~ q 5 7 a S ~ are -~'efi . Eagan City Council Meeting Minutes August 7, 2001 Page 7 Council took a brief break at 9:45 p.m. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - ADAMS OUTDOOR City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a conditional use permit to erect a 756 square foot off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between 1-35E and Lexington Avenue. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. The applicant reviewed the proposed signage. Roger Lurvik, owner of the property, expressed concern over the requirement that caused Adams to remove the sign from the property and the loss of that revenue source. Mayor Awada discussed the original development and intent of the sign ordinance. Bob Graiziger and John Bodger of Adams, spoke about the sign ordinance and intent of the sign ordinance review in 1990. They disagreed with the assertions made by Council members. Sandy Masin, former Councilmember discussed the intent of the sign ordinance and stated that the intent was to ultimately eliminate the signs. Bea Blomquist, former Councilmember, also stated that she recalled the intent of the sign ordinance as being to ultimately eliminate the signs. Councilmember Fields moved, Mayor Awada seconded a motion to deny the application and direct staff to prepare findings of fact for denial of a conditional use permit to erect a 756 square foot (378 square feet per sign face) off-premise sign upon Canadian Pacific Railway property located south of TH 55 between 1-35E and Lexington Avenue in the northwest'/, of Section 2, subject to the following conditions: Aye: 2 Nay: I Carlson opposed. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF AMERICA City Administrator Hedges introduced this item regarding a preliminary subdivision consisting of two lots on approximately ten acres currently platted as Lots 9, 10 and part of 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located at 1769 Yankee Doodle Road at 3290 Terminal Drive. Senior Planner Ridley gave a staff report. John Donnelly, applicant, requested that condition number three regarding restoration of the street and concrete curb be reconsidered. Public Works Director Colbert recommended that the condition remain as part of the preliminary subdivision. Council agreed that the street and concrete curb be restored or an agreement be executed for the private use of public right-of-way. Councilmember Carlson moved, Mayor Awada seconded a motion to approve a preliminary subdivision consisting of two lots on approximately ten acres currently platted as Lots 9, 10 and part of 11, Block 1, Sibley Terminal Industrial Park located at 1769 Yankee Doodle Road at 3290 Terminal Drive in the SE'/. of Section 8, subject to the following conditions. Aye: 3 Nay: 0 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, Bl, E1, Fl, G1, and H1 2. The property shall be platted. a3y Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION (EAGAN PRESERVE) - DUKE REALTY ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: ➢ To approve a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) consisting of two lots and two outlots on approximately 20 acres currently platted as Unisys Park 2°d Addition located north of the Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersection in the SE '/4 of Section 9, subject to conditions listed in the APC minutes. FACTS: ➢ The property is vacant and has been part of Unisys campus for many years. Joe Miller Homes purchased the property (80 acres) in the mid-1990's. Subsequently, the City acquired approximately 60 acres for the purpose of developing Central Park and the Eagan Community Center. The subject site represents the residual 20 acres of the original 80 acres. ➢ The only development proposed in association with the subdivision is a three story, 90, 000 SF office building that will house the offices, labs, and class rooms for the Medical Institute of Minnesota. Any additional future development will need to be consistent with the zoning of the property. ➢ The proposal subdivision will result in lots that will allow development consistent with the R&D zoning. The outlots represent an area conveyed for ponding purposes and an area reserved for a future roadway. The proposed site development (Lot 1, Block 1) will be a three-story office building. Future development of Lot 1, Block 2 is undetermined at this time. ➢ The APC held a Public Hearing regarding this item on September 25, 2001 and they are recommending approval subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. ISSUES: ➢ There was some discussion regarding the provision of an additional public access to the Perron property. ATTACHII1ENTS: (3) Draft September 25 2001 APC Mi^nut'es, page 9136 through~J Staff Report, page ~ through Q6 - Duke has provided additional information that is enclosed w/out page number t City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2001 Page 6 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - DUKE REALTY CORPORATION Chair Heyl opened the last public hearing of the evening regarding a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) of approximately 20.66 acres to create two lots and three outlots, located on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lockheed Martin in the south '/z of Section 9. Senior Planner Ridley introduced this item and highlighted the information presented in the City Staff's planning report dated September 19, 2001. He noted the background and history. Chair Heyl questioned which outlot will be eliminated. She asked if an additional condition would be added to ensure elimination of the lot. Mr. Ridley stated Outlot B will be eliminated. He stated an additional condition could be added to ensure the elimination of Outlot B. Bob Smith, Duke Realty, discussed the site plan and the timing of the project. He stated the plat has several different lots and outlots. He stated the proposed Outlot A will be used as park and trail dedication. He sated the Park Commission accepted the offer of Outlot A. He discussed a storm water management pond on the site that will be maintained and paid for by the applicant. He described a wetland on the north end of the property. He stated Lot 1 is 8.4 acres and will hold the building. He stated the building is a three story, 90,000 square foot office building. He stated Lot 1, Block 2 is being reserved for future development. He discussed the grading plan, parking lot, access points and stated the entire lot will be graded the same for efficiency. Mr. Smith displayed the building layout and discussed the 26% green space. He stated the property was designed to add extra green space to add to the Central Park environment. He stated the landscaping plan needs modifications. Mr. Smith displayed pictures of a similar building in Ohio. He discussed the timing of the development due to the educational establishments schedule. Member Steininger questioned if Outlot D would be deeded to the City. Mr. Smith stated Outlot D will remain in Duke's possession. Member Bendt questioned the present marsh and asked if the grading will be extended to Yankee Doodle Road. Mr. Smith stated the marsh will be mitigated, another marsh will be added on Outlot A and the City's storm water pond will be extended into the wetland. He stated clean water will be circulated into the wetland. He stated the grading will be extended to Yankee Doodle Road. 031b City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2001 Page 7 Member Nosbush stated the proposed facility is nice, however too much woodland will be eliminated. Mr. Smith stated additional trees will be added to the landscaping plan to compensate for those trees lost. He stated that most of trees on the property are not significant. Other commissioners acknowledged the existence of many "scrub" trees. Member Nosbush questioned the number of tenants. Mr. Smith stated only one tenant will own and occupy the facility. Member Bendt questioned the hours of operation. Mr. Smith stated the facility will primarily operate during week days and early evenings. He discussed during holidays and off-peak hours, the parking area will be provided for overflow parking for Central Park and the Community Center. There being no public comment, Chair Heyl closed the Public Hearing and returned the discussion back to the Commission. Member Steininger stated the 40-acre parcel to the west needs a deeded access. Mr. Bauer stated the City is currently in discussion concerning the potential construction of the access. He stated if the other lot is developed, there will need to be an access. Member Steininger questioned if the adjacent property owner is protected. Mr. Bauer stated the goal of the outlot is to preserve the corridor in the future so that if the Perron property owner decides to develop, he can then petition the City for construction and the that corridor is protected. He stated options are being left open at this point. Member Segal asked if the property to the south has access to the public right-of-way without Outlot D. He expressed concern regarding creating land that is land locked. Assistant City Engineer John Gorder stated the property to the south does have access to the right-of-way because the access is not restricted on public right-of-way. Member Steininger stated the present time is best to discuss the access. He stated in addition the existing access to Yankee Doodle Road, the property will need additional or alternate access at some point. Member Nosbush questioned the requirements of sewer and water. a3 r City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2001 Page 8 Mr. Bauer stated the utilities are a separate issue. He stated the corridor is being preserved. He stated he is not certain that the City has the ability to give full dedication to the road. Mr. Smith stated the property will not be dedicated at this time. He stated the property to the west does have access to Yankee Doodle Road. Chair Heyl stated the applicant could return to the City for a re-plat. Member Steininger questioned why the City should wait to act on the access. He stated he will vote against the request due to the access issues. Member Segal stated that the City Council should give more consideration before approval. He discussed the many policy issues. He suggested that the City Council take a hard look with Staff and seek legal advice. Chair Heyl stated a future dispute is possible with the properties to the west. Member Segal moved, Member Huusko seconded a motion to approve the request for a Preliminary Subdivision (Eagan Preserve) of approximately 20.66 acres to create two lots and three outlots, located on the north side of Yankee Doodle Road, west of Lockheed Martin in the south '/2 of Section 9 subject to the following conditions as amended: 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1-4, Cl, 2 and 4, D1, E1, F1, G1, and H1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. The applicant shall work with city staff to revise "street-scape" landscaping along Central Parkway and along the Community Center access road, to match the "look" of landscaping to be installed through the City improvement project for Central Parkway and the Community Center. 4. All conifer trees (spruce and pine) shall be placed at least 15 feet back of curb areas to allow for mature tree width growth without interference with vehicles, snow storage, lawn maintenance, etc 5. Trees placed inside parking lot islands shall be centered within the island to allow for mature tree root growth and snow storage. The applicant shall also include, within the landscape plan, specifications for soil site preparation inside parking lot a39 City of Eagan Advisory Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2001 Page 9 islands. Each tree shall be installed in a minimum of 300 cubic feet of top soil, (i.e. 6 x 20 x 2.5 feet top soil). 6. The development shall meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by creating a minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 1.77 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.51 acres. The stormwater treatment pond shall be constructed generally according to NURP standards with a maximum depth of 8 feet and as close as feasible to a 10:1 aquatic bench from the normal water level. A standard outlet skimmer may not be appropriate in this case because of hydrologic considerations associated with the wetland replacement area. 7. A cash dedication of $9,024 shall be required in lieu of ponding for untreated stormwater that will runoff of 1.3 acres of the site. 8. The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan shall be approved by City Council. 9. The developer shall negotiate a Parking Agreement with City for its use of the parking area for City events. 10. The developer shall provide title evidence that the Private Perimeter Road Agreement is no longer applicable to the subject parcel. 11. The developer shall dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the construction of Central parkway. 12. Outlot B shall be removed from the plat and treated as an exception to the plat. Member Huusko agreed with Member Steininger, however will vote for approval of the proposal. Member Bendt stated the application is excellent. He stated on Outlot D the developer • is taking into consideration the concerns of the Planning Commission. He stated he is in favor of the proposal. A vote was taken. Aye: Chair Heyl, Members Nosbush, Huusko, Bendt and Segal Nay: Steininger a3q t PLANNING REPORT CITY OF EAGAN REPORT DATE: September 19, 2001 CASE: 09-PS-15-08-01 APPLICANT: Duke Realty Corp HEARING DATE: September 25, 2001 PROPERTY OWNER: Joe Miller Farms, Inc. PREPARED BY: Michael J. Ridley REQUEST: Preliminary Subdivision LOCATION: SE'/4 of Section 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Special Area (SA) ZONING: Research & Development (R&D) SUMMARY OF REQUEST Duke Realty is requesting approval of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots and four outlots on approximately 20 acres currently platted as Unisys Park 2nd Addition located north of the Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersection in the SE'/e of Section 9. AUTHORITY FOR REVIEW City Code Section 13.20 Subd. 6 states that "In the case of platting, the Planning Commission and the Council shall be guided by criteria, including the following, in approving, denying or establishing conditions related thereto: A. That the proposed subdivision does comply with applicable City Code provisions and the Comprehensive Guide Plan. B. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision complies with applicable plans of Dakota County, State of Minnesota, or the Metropolitan Council. C. That the physical characteristics of the site including, but not limited to, topography, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion and siltation, susceptibility to flooding, water storage and retention are such that the site is suitable for the type of development or use contemplated. a ~a Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 2 D. That the site physically is suitable for the proposed density of development. E. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvement is not likely to cause environmental damage. F. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause health problems. G. That the design of the subdivision or the improvements will not conflict with easements of record or with easements established by judgment of court. H. That completion of the proposed development of the subdivision can be completed in a timely manner so as not to cause an economic burden upon the City for maintenance, repayment of bonds, or similar burden. 1. That the subdivision has been properly planned for possible solar energy system use within the subdivision or as it relates to adjacent property. (Refer to City Handbook on Solar Access). J. That the design of public improvements for the subdivision is compatible and consistent with the platting or approved preliminary plat on adjacent lands. K. That the subdivision is in compliance with those standards set forth in that certain document entitled "City of Eagan Water Quality Management Plan for the Gun Club Lake Watershed Management Organization" which document is properly approved and filed with the office of the City Clerk hereinafter referred to as the "Water Quality Management Plan". Said document and all of the notations, references and other information contained therein shall have the same force and effect as if fully set down herein and is hereby made a part of this Chapter by reference and incorporated herein as fully as if set forth herein at length. It shall be the responsibility of the City Clerk to maintain the Water Quality Management Plan and make the same available to the public." BACKGROUND/HISTORY The property is vacant and has been part of Unisys campus for many years. Joe Miller Homes purchased the property (80 acres) in the mid-1990's. Subsequent to the City denying a request by Miller to amend the Guide Plan to allow residential development, the City acquired approximately 60 acres for the purpose of developing Central Park and the Eagan Community Center. The subject site represents the residual 20 acres of the original 80 acres. i t Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS The undeveloped site has rolling topography and is lightly wooded with many open areas. SURROUNDING USES The following existing uses, zoning, and comprehensive guide plan designations surround the subject property: North - NWA Office; zoned R&D and SA. South - Yankee Doodle Road/Commercial; zoned R&D and SA. East - Lockheed Martin; zoned R&D and SA. West - Townhomes; zoned R-3 and Medium Density (MD). EVALUATION OF REQUEST The only development proposed in association with the subdivision is a three story, 90, 000 SF office building that will house the offices, labs, and class rooms for the Medical Institute of Minnesota. Any additional future development will need to be consistent with the zoning of the property. The property is zoned Research and Development (R&D) and is presently designated on the Guide Plan Map as Special Area (SA). Staff reviewed the proposed us versus the R&D Zoning and the Council was provided information regarding Duke's development plan. Due to the nature of the uses within and the design of the proposed building, the conclusion was that the building and use were consistent with the zoning of the property. The SA designation was applied to the Central Area (and other areas) when the Guide Plan was updated earlier this year to allow for further study. In this instance, the Council saw value in reviewing this quadrant of the Central Area further due, in large part, to the City's acquisition of 60 acres within what was formerly the Unisys Campus. Compatibility with Surrounding Area - The proposal subdivision will result in lots that will allow development consistent with the R&D zoning. The outlots represent park dedication/ponding area, residual property from the Central Parkway alignment and a future east/west access. The proposed site development (Lot 1, Block 1) will be a three-story office building. Future development of Lot 1, Block 2 is undetermined at this time. Lots - The proposed subdivision creates buildable parcels (Lot 1, Block 1 = 8.4 acres, Lot 1, Block 2 = 3.6 acres) that exceed City requirements for lot area and width. Setbacks - Required setbacks can be met. a yo Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 4 Parking - The parking required for Lot 1, Block 1, based on a 90,000 SF office, is 480 stalls. The developer is proposing 583 stalls. The applicant has stated that their client believes there is a need to provide this amount of parking due to expected demands. All proposed stalls meet the dimensional requirements of the City Code. Building Architecture/Materials - The developer is proposing a reddish brown precast with over half of the building glass being glass. Color photos of a similar building constructed by the developer in Cincinnati are attached as exhibits. Si na e - The applicant has not submitted a Signage Plan. Signage will need to be reviewed for consistency with other signage in the office park. Lighting - The applicant has not submitted a Lighting Plan. Lighting will need to be consistent with City Code requirements. Landscaping - The proposed amount of landscaping is acceptable; however, all conifer trees (spruce and pine) should be placed at least 15 feet back of curb areas to allow for mature tree width growth without interference with vehicles, snow storage, lawn maintenance, etc. Also, trees placed inside parking lot islands should be centered within the island to allow for mature tree root growth and snow storage. The applicant should also include, within the landscape plan, specifications for soil site preparation inside parking lot islands. Each tree should be installed in a minimum of 300 cubic feet of top soil, (i.e. 6 x 20 x 2.5 feet top soil). The applicant should also work with city staff to revise landscaping along Central Parkway and along the Community Center access road, to match the "look" of landscaping to be installed through the City improvement project for Central Parkway and Community Center street- scaping. Green Space - Green Space requirements are met. The proposal has a green space of 26%. Grading/Wetlands - The preliminary grading plan is acceptable. A majority of the site will be graded in preparation for building and parking lot construction. The preliminary grading plan shows a large retaining wall along the west and south edges. The developer is negotiating with the property owner of Parcel 010-79 to provide transition grading onto that property to eliminate or reduce the amount of retaining walls needed. The proposed grading for the development will match the grades of Central Parkway to the east and the Community Center site to the north, both currently under construction with City public improvements projects. There is one 0.35-acre natural wetland on the Eagan Preserve site. Under the Fish and Wildlife Service classification system, this is a Type 3 wetland. The wetland is under the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), which is administered by the City of Eagan. Thus, any proposals to drain, fill, or excavate this area are subject to approval by the City. q3 i i Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 5 The developer proposes to fill the 15,238 square-foot wetland completely. The WCA allows up to 400 square feet of fill and requires proposals with more than that amount of fill to document attempts to avoid and minimize those impacts and to submit a proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan. Wetland replacement is based on a 2:1 ratio, which means that twice the amount of impacted acres needs to be replaced. According to the replacement plan the City received from the developer on August 29, 2001, the developer proposes to mitigate for 15,238 square feet of wetland fill by replacement of 31,362 square feet of wetland. The overall result would be 886 square feet more than the minimum required by the WCA. The proposed wetland impact by Duke-Weeks Construction is subject to a public comment period-in accordance with WCA rules-that ends September 24, 2001. A replacement plan decision on this matter by Eagan City Council is scheduled for October 2, 2001. Storm Drainage/Water Quality - The preliminary storm drainage plan is acceptable. Storm water runoff will drain via storm sewer to Pond CP-3 (as designated in the City Storm Water Management Plan -1990) in the northwest comer of the site. Pond CP-3 drains northwest through storm sewer and will be expanded to provide for water quality ponding and wetland mitigation for the development. Also, as part of the development, the developer will expand Pond CP-3 to accommodate runoff from a portion the Community Center, eliminating the need for the construction of new ponding on the Community Center site. The development should meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by creating a minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 1.77 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.51 acres. The stormwater treatment pond should be constructed generally according to NURP standards with a maximum depth of 8 feet and as close as feasible to a 10:1 aquatic bench from the normal water level. A standard outlet skimmer may not be appropriate in this case because of hydrologic considerations associated with the wetland replacement area. A cash dedication of $9,024 should be required in lieu of ponding for untreated stormwater that will runoff of 1.3 acres of the site. The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan should be approved by City Council, allowing the developer to fill 15,238 square feet of wetland and create 20,037 square feet of NWC and 15,100 square feet PVC wetland. Utilities - The preliminary utility plan is acceptable. Sanitary sewer for Lot 1, Block 1 is available for connection along the north edge of the site. Sanitary sewer will be extended along Yankee Doodle Road under the Central Parkway project to serve Lot 2. Water main will be extended to the proposed development, also as part of the current Central Parkway project. Streets/Access/Circulation - Public street access for the development will be available via Central Parkway to the east and the Community Center drive to the north, both currently under 0?Vy Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 6 construction. Central Parkway will be a 58-foot wide street with a landscaped center median with a 10-foot wide trail on the west and north side, extending from Pilot Knob Road to Yankee Doodle Road. Easements/ Permits/ Right-of-Way - Outlot D, as shown on the preliminary plat is delineated to show the future right-of-way of "Quarry Road", a street planned to be extended west, ultimately along the south edge of Quarry Park to Coachman Road. Quarry Road will provide public street access to adjacent properties and an east-west traffic reliever for Yankee Doodle Road. Dakota County is requiring the dedication of an additional 25 feet of right-of-way along Yankee Doodle Road (County Road 28), as shown on the preliminary plat, to accommodate the reconstruction of Yankee Doodle Road in the area, currently scheduled for 2004. Tree Preservation - The proposed development will result in the removal of fifty-three thousand six-hundred square feet (53,600 ft sq) of significant woodlands (71.9 % of the total). According to the City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance allowable tree removal for this type of development proposal (single-phase, multiple-lot, commercial) is set at 47.5% of the total significant trees. With a proposed removal more than the allowable amount, there will be required tree mitigation for this proposal. This required tree mitigation calculates to thirty-six (36) Category A trees. The applicant should submit a revised tree mitigation plan indicating complete mitigation fulfillment through the installation of thirty-six (36) Category A trees, or an equivalent combination of Category B and/or Category C trees. These trees are to be installed in "natural areas" (i.e. around ponds, in open areas, etc.). Tree Protective measures (i.e. orange colored silt fence or 4 foot polyethylene laminate safety netting) should be installed at the Drip Line or at the perimeter of the Critical Root Zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees/woodlands to be preserved on-site. The should applicant contact the City Forestry Division and set up a pre-construction site inspection at least five days prior to any grading to ensure compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan and placement of the Tree Protection Fencing. Parks and Recreation - There is no trail dedication. The park dedication should consist of the development of a pond on Outlot A. The pond is intended to service run off from the community center and shall be constructed in accordance with an approved City plan. The pond to be constructed should be at the expense of the developer. Details of access, easement, and ownership are to be negotiated with the City. Also, the developer has agreed, in principal, to the public use of parking lots during City events. The City and the developer should negotiate the use of this private property. ass Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 7 SUMMARY/CONCLUSION The subdivision and the proposed development appear consistent with the objectives of the City Code and the zoning district. Issues regarding Central Parkway need to be worked through but these can be accommodated with the Final Subdivision submittals. ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED To recommend approval or denial of a Preliminary Subdivision consisting of two lots and four outlots on approximately 20 acres currently platted as Unisys Park 2°d Addition located north of the Yankee Doodle Road/Federal Drive intersection in the SE %4 of Section 9. If approved, the following conditions shall apply. 1. The developer shall comply with these standards conditions of plat approval as adopted by Council on February 3, 1993: Al, B1-4, C1, 2 and 4, Dl, E1, F1, G1, and H1 2. The property shall be platted. 3. The applicant shall work with city staff to revise "street-scape" landscaping along Central Parkway and along the Community Center access road, to match the "look" of landscaping to be installed through the City improvement project for Central Parkway and the Community Center. 4. All conifer trees (spruce and pine) shall be placed at least 15 feet back of curb areas to allow for mature tree width growth without interference with vehicles, snow storage, lawn maintenance, etc 5. Trees placed inside parking lot islands shall be centered within the island to allow for mature tree root growth and snow storage. The applicant shall also include, within the landscape plan, specifications for soil site preparation inside parking lot islands. Each tree shall be installed in a minimum of 300 cubic feet of top soil, (i.e. 6 x 20 x 2.5 feet top soil). 6. The development shall meet the City's water quality requirements primarily by creating a minimum stormwater treatment capacity of 1.77 acre-feet covering a minimum area of 0.51 acres. The stormwater treatment pond shall be constructed generally according to NURP standards with a maximum depth of 8 feet and as close as feasible to a 10:1 a Planning Report - Eagan Preserve September 25, 2001 Page 8 aquatic bench from the normal water level. A standard outlet skimmer may not be appropriate in this case because of hydrologic considerations associated with the wetland replacement area. 7. A cash dedication of $9,024 shall be required in lieu of ponding for untreated stormwater that will runoff of 1.3 acres of the site. 8. The proposed wetland replacement and monitoring plan shall be approved by City Council. 9. The developer shall negotiate a Parking Agreement with City for it's use of the parking area for City events. 10. The developer shall provide title evidence that the Private Perimeter Road Agreement is no longer applicable to the subject parcel. 11. The developer shall dedicate the right-of-way necessary for the construction of Central parkway. STANDARD CONDITIONS OF PLAT APPROVAL A. Financial Obligations 1. This development shall accept its additional financial obligations as defined in the staffs report in accordance with the final plat dimensions and the rates in effect at the time of final plat approval. B. Easements and Rights-of-Way 1. This development shall dedicate 10-foot drainage and utility easements centered over all lot lines and, in addition, where necessary to accommodate existing or proposed utilities for drainage ways within the plat. The development shall dedicate easements of sufficient width and location as determined necessary by engineering standards. 2. This development shall dedicate, provide, or financially guarantee the acquisition costs of drainage, ponding, and utility easements in addition to public street rights-of-way as required by the alignment, depth, and storage capacity of all required public utilities and streets located beyond the boundaries of this plat as necessary to service or accommodate this development. 3. This development shall dedicate all public right-of-way and temporary slope easements for ultimate development of adjacent roadways as required by the appropriate jurisdictional agency. 4. This development shall dedicate adequate drainage and ponding easements to incorporate the required high water elevation plus three (3) feet as necessitated by storm water storage volume requirements. C. Plans and Specifications 1. All public and private streets, drainage systems and utilities necessary to provide service to this development shall be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer in accordance with City adopted codes, engineering standards, guidelines and policies prior to application for final plat approval. 2. A detailed grading, drainage, erosion, and sediment control plan must be prepared in accordance with current City standards prior to final plat approval. 3. This development shall ensure that all dead-end public streets shall have a cul-de-sac constructed in accordance with City engineering standards. C~ Yff 4. A separate detailed landscape plan shall be submitted overlaid on the proposed grading and utility plan. The financial guarantee for such plan shall be included in the Development Contract and shall not be released until one year after the date of City certified compliance. D. Public Improvements 1. If any improvements are to be installed under a City contract, the appropriate project must be approved by Council action prior to final plat approval. E. Permits 1. This development shall be responsible for the acquisition of all regulatory agency permits required by the affected agency prior to final plat approval. F. Parks and Trails Dedication 1. This development shall fulfill its park and trail dedication requirements as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. G. Water Quality Dedication 1. This development shall be responsible for providing a cash dedication, ponding, or a combination thereof in accordance with the criteria identified in the City's Water Quality Management Plan, as recommended by the Advisory Parks, Recreation and Natural Resource Commission and approved by Council action. H. Other 1. All subdivision, zoning and other ordinances affecting this development shall be adhered to, unless specifically granted a variance by Council action. Advisory Planning Commission City Council Approved: August 25, 1987 September 15, 1987 Revised: July 10, 1990 Revised: February 2, 1993 LTSMS STANOARD.CON I L FINANCIAL OBLIGATION - Eagan Preserve Preliminary Subdivision There are pay-off balances of special assessments totaling 5-0- on the parcel for which the conditional use permit and subdivision is requested. At this time, there are pending assessments, which total $506,350 on the parcel for which the subdivision is requested. These pending assessments are related to Project 7908, Central Parkway Based upon the study of the financial obligations collected in the past and the uses proposed for the property, the following charges are proposed. The charges are computed using the City's existing fee schedule and for the connection and availability of the City's utility system. The charges become due and payable with connection to the City's Utilities. The charges will be computed using the rates in effect at time of connection or subdivision. IMPROVEMENT USE RATE QUANTITY AMOUNT Storm sewer trunk C/I $.132/Sq. Ft. 548,644 Sq. Ft. $72,421 TOTAL $72,421 asp i i 0 1!"an aoundary Location Map ~P~Am: auildlrq Footptrtt t to r a . ° 4 d I F $1 4" ep ' PI E• ° L I s c- -0 'r Fit, A 4 f C) v o n + 0 ` @IE t~1 Q t • t: . M®®®is ® • t t i'{r ,A S` ~L Ef~ ®mmm mm~ Subject Sit x j ky a 16 E ® . 1000 0 1tp0 2000 Feet Development/Developer: Eagan Preserve Application: Preliminary Subdi Case No.: 09-PS-1S-08- Wp Pr■p■ n ER rw t.1. %,V b■■■ wap dtb provW.d N tN o■kM■ eouney Yt7■p■rtnwro ■nd euom or .ww■ 2001. City of Eagan THIS MAP If INTENDED FOR RE,:, ENCE YiE..L. w E M ! N N E S C T a Tbs City of Eaoan and Dakota County do not ywnrrtae tM aeeuraey of this Information and an S C--.ft D■vdepiw■- Dep■rtw-t not responsible ter errors or emissions. Current Zoning and Comprehensive Guide Plan Eagan Preserve Land Use Map Case No. 09-PS-15-08-01 Zoning Map s V `\`l V a O roc0 t Current Zoning: RD Research and Development P RD A LB NS -El P4 I GB PF A 3 1 R~ NRA taw ren o PD eoo o tao Comprehensive Guide Plan z U Land Use Map M O sw dD oho N ~ . Current Land Use Designation: P SA Special Area SA SA o►s RC QP MD NO E SA A MO 000 o 03a taro Pm m m to 0 hwl Yew en ~eeNM~ Ceynty Leer Barmy Dger6wnt 04Vt1Dt. N nb a erY~taYr~ by Clq sW. 4kity of Eagan Z W E Community THIS MAP Is INTENDED FOR REFERENCE UsE ONLY Development Department The City of Eagan and Dakota County do not guarani the accuracy of this Information. S I L i s 807.62 9id3.. f aft; Im Ng E v _ 1 _ -`..-max ~ / / J ~ \ 1 ~ ~ t ~ ~ I i f -5 45~W~ ~ Ili ~ ~yJ~l e52 ~ ~ 4v • ~ E, ~ 1 I I I ~q ` I I I ` •J. ji-II ~ - I ~ y~// ~ i-I ~ \ \~I IIII f ~,I , ~~~i~~fF I ~ ~ N81 lilt 78~ ~ilJ i /x n n rr , F rr = '~''~}F .Fir' ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > p~ ( , m o L -47 c V b: W;; i p PfiEL~ABJAflT $UBDMSION ARGOSY EDUCATION R INC. RY o ( f will EAGAN PRESER SJBDMSION ".w' f Ft t • r1 t Ia:}[, fo( 1 ~![ti[- YANKEE DOOOtF RWO t P 07 RION [OAD ~i • ti ~~-1 Be 4l1t 1! ~.a j, EAG~w. wNMESOTA / arc .J J e _ Y Existing Conditions u; r i _ 17' Nrsa Sus aSR ` jj~ pin 1 A 1101/3 r a;.•1a NOISIAIOMIS AMVMMIJUd- 'M`dW Y O3 ASOOWV NOISIAN1811S AtlrN1Y13tld 'r~1~i 1 :r 11 ~a~ 1 11 \ j 1 I - 1 ir'- - - tip-- - - - - J y~~- . ~ ! 1~ I I I nwi~P•nl~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ t ~ ''Ja~ ~ • l ~ ' yA•t ~nwln moors - 1~---- vim awc+a y; J e. W * i „ t d 1 1- V i 1 c` _ ~ 1 I 1=I I iCeR R~nttass« ` - ih! I i 41 vzz, II ry I ~ I F' s9~610!' - 6-- 50935'45'E t t! 1 807.62 1 >E I i ~ / 61Z~;Oa' If If N0935'45'w' 817.19 °ogg$goor I j°Cf t I 1 / 0/I'ti b _ O cf .t °~~I I f9 p. L oooo tit {l2~~ I 1/ fs//~'o °o m > kpR #i F~ 1! fFE J;=j y8 , t~FI tE Y Y;t I ~ I " III p uU-H,~ j o I °o i tl,,° r I ,1 III I 1 oonlo• um ! t ids [ I 1 1 ILL ~a I o N N ONi Ip - V (Y~.' 0 0 0 I I l i > n~ ~~~~^A'I~n rpn ~1 I~ I Ih NNN NN NN L~NI jn O I ~,I O I L--- y.4 Pa' > > "I ; Il\ III A A i~ 11-- - tt~ 1 I I III o PA ° II OIRLOT O Yr44 z i \ ~ - / III I . ` ~ ,mow-~-- I ~ I N rm5x {I ~l - - 10ltt3sdltT - - - - t - - - - - - - - N89.5056 W 50227 ~j N x ~ tt:I ' ttet i -------------i- --A---- C, r, A 77 ct J r 111j) S PFI1RJ WARY SUBDMSION ARGOSY EDUCA N G OUP, Y SUBONISION ; tl N t t+ EAGAN PR irom r~.~ rry+it Q Y 1 1 ~~~.t YANKU DOODLE RW k PILOT [N00 ROC ( ( N I {I~tl EAO M. MINNESOTA we t J , 9r_ ` L PRELIMINARY PLAT ~Q _ U0 Id 104uoO uo!soJ3 V a6ou!ou(3 u'PDPJ 1 ~ i~ , VLO53NNIn 'NV9V3 a' ~J 1 Mbi so+>, 10114 a a4OM 310000 33)1WA ]iii. o _C2. j 32,d NV9v3 t:d,.• U ° !o ~ NOWAKK 1S I 'dno VOA03 ASOOdY NOSWCBM AWNrf-2LW t_TT~~itFli i •~1 - Otis ~~li hA C,.~ y Zr= va----. } 0L- t` ...1~:~ t 11 `f' \ .'Yy / • - 1 1!111 u' I t ` I' T Iv t r r4 d o¢ A ' I ° 1 11 ~11 ~,il v III 1 1 t `1 i 1 X111 y O0>• Yv- lII _ I ~..'I. ' 11111 { III ~ ~f 1 1 x'111 '111 , 111 e 7 EQ H f ~ r ~ ' 1111 I ~ ~ t ~ ~ E ` ! ! ° ' ~I ~ , it / ' ~ Mini 1 ~ ■ _ ~ i 1 ~ I~i ~}fe `i~ p~p ■p]tt■p] !p]]! ~ ep` e!■ . :I~~~`~.:\~,-f~ ••'~r=/• nllll 'y' -..::}R ~ a~j~.if~~il~~~7i[0■~l~~e~ I Iljpl ' J gp e gg g 1~1 ' ;~InN' ~P.~~I~~1dCl~i~iii~$;dill I /1 ilii~ r ri°O1°~°tf I I TI I,~..tr1O}' fIlF1 '~♦I, ' a 1 11111'1 • I II I~ r ' , /r fit ` ~ \ X11 tll hlll ~ , / it i J}1 i il'iil' 1 _ snw ~ _ i~; I' • :i ill' ~,{'~':'I/~if r - - ~6-5 1 I 1 : 111 - - - i I r: 9 / l / I1 r ~'l111 "~.,a'~, - - f ' l I la ~ lysr'l~~ ! elan. a.wn `.,._..,,...~'~n''°1.~-;,,, < ~ C.. ' •..y,.,.:~,. ~ ..a I { 1 / /u{//of l - - - ~ t % /i ~y Wit' \ \ c1 ? 0!//r t~ n y\ `i 1 tom; G a, t 1 + \ 1 ,`'q 't i : v' . e<F`,i ; ~kx: <v / rte' `7.a,. ; ♦ 1, - d x AINOO&PO" Mlos7t4" 'WW3 WOY .oy. LOly : OM V 110000 33"A r • , 3 0 M 3NI 'dnoan uionai AsoDuv 1~0GWS-3 AHVNVflgW s t 2 3z Ana L _1 _ N i V TT - ¢O -R .err _ 't._ - - - - ~ ~ - - \ A 1A s I a I • j .iii ~i a}}flt~I t- ~ ilt A 1 IA', I a I y I u I I > / CIF f Y ~ O I u~ w wcsr whir O~t-.1-Cr~awcr•IN• bylyY M1Vl L r~.w ..+rc.+ a♦a-rc..q♦ri•nttwti..• warn vzri• ~ to ~4i 11 ~ I ~ ~ ♦ ~ .11 / ix.-~:.~-sar--.._1 se,~-o - P~== ,J F ~ ^ • \ / fir- ~ \ (r , ~ ~ ~ ~ ,11 l~ ~ ~ i ; lli~l III Or ,III \ J Io1 / ! E ii Nti •+e aii••{ N+ { P { it ttti{t esc- I II 666i~it 111111 fill it, d i i i f4e64ii If li +{++a Rtt+Stt{••ettt++•.++etl{+{5ti P S / 1 2 I ~i~~ii~~~iiitiitiltititiH~~ii;i"= ♦ ~ ~ '1 ~1 I ~ l + e P { + P { P +{{ttee t {ai{{i{t+t+fe{{\{+e.etq I r ( / \ -i . ♦ I ~ iii { { i{F+NiFtiiSGRtcFiLi i'.tR+~ Ft - I I l ~ \ \ ' I ~ / 1 I li++i $ ♦ I f l- a C= ` N r- i~xe a+r-------- y K H n o i PPARJM JARY SUBDNISION ARGOSY E ATION ROUP, INC. NIT, SUBDIVISION i t e N J I !~11~ tc EAGA RESERVE y~ li ~~t ~pf o t p i YII YArcEE OOOOIE ROA B ROAp • 1+ w I Iy UGw, ui«r+ESOTf ' ` • I J -j It L H TREE PRESERVATION PLAN wf c J I T gold fivIn i ^I~ r,nae V1o Vom 'NV~V3 10 ` 1) a~ QYOtl lots 101W V 6VOU 316000 37wwA N ! ~ ~~BH 11 Nan 3n83S3ad Nd9V3 f U ° io Ul1r -r a-•;,, N0161N08f18AklVt ENd Iltl~(103 ASOOHY NOSWCEn3ZYNw-ow t- a i1::; yy 4 U --w -_-__-----_____--___3 Wo ro °q+z+r+Y _ _^-!aw` J xm - k - ` t-__-__-- Ix rr a~ \ I 1 ~ _1 I ~ It t I 1t n \ u ti .0 a ° I.I' 'k III !t 1i1 w ;'I.' ~ ; III w oil k ' tr,itl tot~ 3 lk,Yt i~ Pi f f .i-~.: g' 'i = 1 • - , ;~jl ~ ~ ~ 1. ~ _ ~ ~..T-.-_~ it 411/ 11- \I 1 n; A l r lot -jl t 1V1d AVVWR113Yd 1~ 1 I,•t, N ~L m.na • 11711 N u.OY somm 101W , O.OY MOO() ~I ~B wwt~, MOSM 11VOV7 ~Ij~t t v ' 1 le nll, roosu r>s o,u 'dnoro wotivx 3 Asooav Hoswaens 1, 11: ; AWWNVVGUJ - t rrrwl ! (ti i • i rvn•; -~•7nnn.; rt.vl R ~ ~ ~ 2 fit! a 1~`~ •:v: 111 ~ ~~~a!r 11 I \1 i all 1 ' '1 Clow* ► = = I I1. 1 o e~g~~ NN NN NNNW 111 1:. f[ . V ~ Ili ri I t 1:: ~ 7 ~~`a. s! r t w till , , # _ ~ o L .1 . J t; fit f: • / I ~ at :'t t :'r:' -J«. ti.l ~~~.ilt l J J J 40 I1 M cto mot/,' 1 / / 4.90.R6W+ I'm I r / . i rs e' 7 / i B i i 1 i a~ •i . J,1 I 1 I a LI, 1 j~~~r 11 ~n coca III I J z i Agenda Information Memo October 2, 2001 Eagan City Council Meeting C. STOP SIGN PETITION. DIAMOND DR AND GARNET LANE ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Receive the petition for a Stop Sign on Diamond Dr. at Garnet Lane and provide the appropriate direction. FACTS: • City Staff has received a petition requesting the installation of Stop Signs on Diamond Drive at Garnett Lane. Since receipt of this petition, the streets near this intersection have been under construction precluding the staff from performing any measurement of "typical" traffic operations to determine if any warrants justifying these requested traffic control devices have been met. ISSUES: • Based on past experience and knowledge of similar intersections, it is doubtful that Stop Signs will be justified according to the warrants contained in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) that the City has adopted. • Based on current staff workload of completing this year's construction program, a standard traffic evaluation study cannot be completed this year unless a consultant is retained to perform this work at an estimated cost of approx. $2-3,000. ATTACHMENTS: • Petition, pages ~thno h ~ . • Location Map, page a65 . ~6~ FOR CITY USE ONLY DATE RECEIVED -7- a 5 city of eagan DATE PRESENTED TO COUNCIL RECEIVED APPROVED ❑ JUL 2 5 2001 DENIED ❑ EAGAN PETITION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STOP SIGN I/We, a undersigned her y petition the City Council of the City of Eagan to install stop signs on at the intersection with r Ct ar) c~ rr r I ' 01-ea'-S-c s-ee ma~ I/We, request this installation for the following reasons: 1. r lQQS2 5ecl Su T1emen+ 2. 3. 4. I/We, request that the City Council take this petition request under consideration at its earliest opportunity and that we be informed as to when it is scheduled so that we may appear in person if w so ch e Axq ~Z~-K Laf so~ '119S O 1 o~ncl Or l v c M SS 1 a,2 NAME (Please print and initial) ADDRESS D, &n e hl~moha--) 'S5 1 C)'za 2. AA-v~j To Ac~/ 4l~!Y %av~a~~ dlr. Engav, Nth SS1ZZ 3. 1 kyae ~(3(, .i~r•a.~d ~ ~ rn+.) SSI a~ 4. ~,l 11L 14N 9 5. -Dt,,iU k.D,Gws y«Y ~,a►KU+.~ D, L=~~ ~tN ssizz 6. ~a~ ~avrr~ /~yA~~°S ylaN piti,•.o/ldd.. Ea /jtw. SS/a a 7. ~1C1R LIt30 D(24vno►-,per a. '/y/3 Aj 42 nl(p A x ,g 60-UCI.41 S~U) G:FarmsdLish13t PN.d. e I [ City of Eagan Petition for Stop Sign Supplement We request this installation for the following reasons: 1. Diamond Drive is a long, straight, main street into our neighborhood allowing cars to accelerate to an unsafe speed. This speed presents a danger to our children playing in our front yards and driveways. The stop sign would slow the cars down and force them to stop before entering the main parts of our neighborhood. 2. This stop sign would provide a safer street for the kids that use the Cedar School ball fields on the west side of Diamond Drive. The cars leaving the neighborhood would have to stop before continuing on past the ball fields. Q 4098 2105 2101 2097 2130 2124 209 2170 4091 EMERALD LN. 2166 2167 2116 2104 208 9-28-Ot 2163 4097 06 2162 4110 2110 2096 2159 4103 2091 2088 4112 2158 4116 2106 082 2151 4109 078 4118 2150 4124 2087 2143 4115 2102 083 2079 4124 2142 2135 4130 2098 20 2127 4123 4136 094 4130 2134 4129 2088 4134 2128 2117 208 4140 2111 2103 4144 2095 2087 2080 2076 3 2124 GARNET DR. 208 207 4146 2079 2120 G 2075 2116 2112 2108 2104 2100 2096 gR,yFT 207 20 4152 4H 4158 4162 4168 Q 4172 O Cedar Cedar School 0 418 Pond 0 O ZZ 4184 . Park U ~ Z Q 4190 4196 DIFFLEY ROAD ® Stop Sign Petitioners Stop Sign Petition Location Map Diamond Dr. / Garnet Dr. / Garnet Ln. Sept. 2s, o, City of Eagan fo 1--4 <0,0 i r • O O Faithful Shepherd Catholic School and Tri-Parish Center o / Third Annual Silent Auction Event January 26, 2002 RE: Application and Permit for Temporary Liquor License Date: September 14, 2001 Dear Mayor and City Council Members, Thank you for your consideration of our application. We are planning our Third Annual Silent Auction Event to be held at Faithful Shepherd Catholic School on January 26, 2002. Our event will include a dinner and bar service. Since this is a fundraising event, and all proceeds will go to the support of our school, we are requesting your consideration in waiving the applicable fee of $150.00 for this temporary license. If you have any questions regarding this application, please feel free to contact me at the following number: (651)683-0512. Thank you for your support and consideration! Sincerely, Kathelina Draves Food and Entertainment Chairperson Silent Auction Committee, Faithful Shepherd Catholic School T ~.„Lp.i www.ups.sraie.mn.usiatcgambiatcent/torms/4daytemp.htm: Minnesota Department of Public Safety a ALCOHOL AND GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION S"`e s, 444 Cedar St., Suite 133, SL Paul, MN 55101-5133 a~ < (651)296-9519 FAX (651)297-5259 TTY (651)282-6555 T ~ < APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A I TO 4 DAY TEM"RARY ON-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE (Organizes or location limited to 3 permits in a 12 month period) TYPE OR PRINT INFORMATION OF O$G ON DATE ORGAN= T YE PAL T7RF 5 r ST I Mff- OF 3'E[LSSJ IN , LIGATION B t VL H H P Q -951 Ll I;0R W BE S . L 0194 stays) rI OF' ORGA ' TION 0. CLUB 0 CHARITABLE F 'P O NI' ITN ERaS NAME APPRESS T\ IL, rc~o fN YY`Q,, ts-ta rY1 55150 ORGAN17.ATTON OFFICER'S NI AME ADDRESS ORGANILA° ION OFF'ICER'S N)M. A17DIt SS Location wbcre ion ;M G; used. If an outdoor re'1112114, Ilia - 60122 Will lho applicant Contract for intoxicating liquor smTim? If so,** the name and addret~ of dko Liquor tioraate providing the smite. Will %c applicant carry liquor liability' lrpo the ee s ounqAnd amount (NOTE, Insamoe is not mandatory] ~ 11Z W k yf)(lj2 APPROVAL APPLICATION MUST Bib APPROVED BY CITY OR COUNTY REFOR17 SUBMI`IMGTO LIQUOR CONTROL CITY/COUNTY DATE APPROVW CITY FEE AMOUNT LICENSE DATES DATE FEE PAID SIGNA11=- CITY CLERIC OR C:OUN'f Y {?Fr•7CIAl. APPROVED LIQUOR CONTROL DIRECTOR NOTE: Ito not separate these two parts, send both parts to the address above and the original signed by this division will be returned as the lieense. Submit to the City or County at leant 30 days Wom the event. PS-t}9079(Sf95 I oft 06/14/2001 10:33 AM 1 t