04/09/2002 - City Council SpecialAGENDA
- SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
TUESDAY
APRIL 9, 2002
5:00 P.M.
CITY OF EAGAN MUNICIPAL CENTER
COMMUNITY ROOM
I. ROLL CALL AND AGENDA ADOPTION
II. VISITORS TO BE HEARD
III. REVIEW WESCOTT SQUARE REDEVELOPMENT
PROPOSALS
IV. UPDATE RE: AIRPORT BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE
V. UPDATE /DIRECTION RE: DARE FUNDING AND
SPECIAL REQUEST BY ISD 191
VI. REVIEW PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES IN
PRECINCT BOUNDARIES
VII. REVIEW CASCADE BAY STROLLER POLICY
VIII. SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE ON LOCATIONS FOR
SOCCER FIELDS
IX. PART III 2002-2007 PARKS C.I.P.
X. FUNDING OPTIONS FOR STORM MITIGATION
XI. OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
_ S. ~,,.~. ' MEMO
' _ city of eagan
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: APRIL 5, 2002
SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING /TUESDAY, APRIL 9
A Special City Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, April 9 in the remodeled Eagan Municipal
Center Community Room beginning at 5:00 p.m. There will be a sandwich available for each member
of the City Council at 4:30 p.m. in the lunchroom.
REVIEW WESCOTT SQUARE REDEVELOPOMENT PROPOSALS
At the March 19, 2002 City Council meeting, further consideration of the Wescott Square
Redevelopment Proposals was continued to the April 9 workshop to allow additional time for the City
Councilmembers to review the proposals submitted by JS Partnership and CommonBond
Communities. Those proposals were sent out with the City Council packet for the March 19 meeting.
The documents are relatively thick and if any member of the City Council needs an additional set,
please contact the City Administrator's office.
In summary, at the City Council meeting on December 11, 2001, the Council directed staff to enter into
a preliminary development agreement with CommondBond Communities for the purpose of
redeveloping the 120 unit Wescott Square multi-family neighborhood. During the meeting, Wescott
property owners asked for an opportunity to present a plan to the City Council for consideration.
Early in 2002, the City developed a competitive proposal process to determine the wherewithal of the
existing owners and CommonBond to perform necessary rehabilitation and continued delivery of
neighborhood service programs while limiting the City's ongoing financial commitment. It was later,
the decision of the City Council to no longer continue delivery of neighborhood service programs
beginning July 1 of this calendar year.
Two (2) proposals were submitted to the City, one by CommonBond Communities and the second by
JS Partnership which is formed by two of the existing property owners, Jeff Johnson and John
Sowazds. City Councilmember Bakken, who is designated by the City Council to act as a
subcommittee for the purpose of performing some additional fact finding and reviewing the proposals
on behalf of the City Council along with City staff, recommended that the City's financial consultant,
Springsted, perform a comparative analysis of the proposals to assist the City in identifying a party that
meets the objective stated in the Request for Qualifications/Proposal. Attached on pages ~p
through ~ is another copy of the Request for Qualifications/Proposal and a report prepared by
Springsted regarding the Wescott Squaze Redevelopment Proposals.
As staff noted in preparation for the March 19 City Council meeting, the ability to determine financial
feasibility of any proposal is difficult at this early stage. CommonBond has not prepared a proforma
for the project because they do not have much of the necessary information as yet, however, they
clearly have a demonstrated history of securing substantial outside financing for lazge projects. JS
Partnership has more detailed financial projections due to their operating history and familiarity with
the project area, however, it is uncertain of the level to which the newly formed partnership will be able
to secure the many financing sources included in its preliminary budget.
Representatives of Springsted will be present at the Special City Council meeting to provide their
comments about their review of the proposals.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide further direction on the selection of a developer for the Wescott Square Redevelopment to
be scheduled at a future regular City Council meeting for formal action.
UPDATE RE: AIRPORT BLUDE RIBBON COMMITTEE
In October 2000, Northwest Airlines and most other industry user representatives to the Metropolitan
Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) withdrew from the organization. In the months that
followed, Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Executive Director Jeff Hamiel asked Dr. John
Brandl to do an analysis of MASAC's demise and make recommendations for repairing the
organization. Dr. Brandl spent several months meeting with former MASAC members to understand
the organization before issuing his report in September 2001.
MAC is very interested in seeing an organization similar to MASAC continue to function. It is an
important communication and technical review vehicle between the airport, its users and the impacted
communities. A Blue Ribbon Panel was appointed to negotiate a new framework that would bring
both sides back to the table. Representing the community interests is Barret Lane, Minneapolis
Council Member; Jill Smith, former council member in Mendota Heights; and Eagan assistant city
administrator Jamie Verbrugge. Representing the users are John DeCostar of Northwest Airlines, Pete
Levermore of UPS, and Bob Johnson of MBAR (Minnesota Business Aviation Association). The
panel is being facilitated by John Himle, principal of Himle-Horner and former MAC commissioner.
The panel has worked diligently to produce a framework that is approaching acceptability from both
sides. This document was shared with the Eagan Airport Relations Commission in March. The
community panel members also hosted a meeting of former MASAC community members to review
the proposed framework. There are several issues that are still of concern to the communities, but it is
important for the panel members to engage our respective city councils before moving forwazd.
Attached on pages ~ through~is the proposed framework for the Metropolitan Airport Noise
Oversight Committee (MANOC). Assistant City Administrator Verbrugge will walk through the
highlights of the report and review remaining issues. The community concerns from Eagan and other
cities will be shazed with the Blue Ribbon Panel at its next meeting on April 10.
a
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To give direction regarding the proposed MANOC framework.
UPDATE /DIRECTION RE: DARE FUNDING AND SPECIAL REQUEST BY ISD 191
During late February, the City of Eagan received correspondence from District 191 requesting that the
City of Eagan consider absorbing a cost for liaison officers and for DARE programming for the coming
school year 2002-2003 as a way of assisting the district in their time of financial need. The cost to the
City of Eagan is approximately $25,000. This letter and the attached budget reduction plan that was
provided by the school district was forwarded to the City Council as part of an Informative Memo at
that time.
The City Administrator and Chief of Police have been discussing the overall funding of the DARE and
school liaison officers as it relates to all three school districts and any presence at private schools, i.e.,
Faithful Shepherd, Trinity Lone Oak Church, Tesseract School. There was also an interest in learning
how Burnsville and Savage would be addressing the same request presented by District 191.
Chief Therkelsen has completed his background review and for another co y of the letter and attached
budget reduction plan from District 191, refer to pages ~ through and for a copy of a memo
and findings from Chief Therkelsen, refer to his report on page through ~.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide direction to the City Administrator and Chief of Police regarding School District 191's
request for DARE funding.
REVIVEW FOR PROPOSALS FOR CHANGES IN PRECINCT BOUNDARIES
In response to the redistricting that has occurred at the State level the City is required to change certain
precinct boundaries. After the Dakota County Cities have completed their precinct boundary changes,
the County reviews them and changes County Commissioner districts as necessary or desired. The
City must take formal action by Apri130, 2002. Enclosed on pages ~~ through is a copy
of a memo from City Clerk Karels and Director of Administrative Services VanOverbek outlining
staff work and Councilmember Bakken's work in looking at various options for City Council
consideration. A special thank you to Councilmember Bakken for volunteering his time to provide
additional options for Council consideration.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide direction for preparation of precinct changes to be formally considered by the City Council
at a subsequent meeting.
REVIEW CASCADE BAY STROLLER POLICY
At the direction of the City Council made at the last City Council Listening Session on Tuesday, April
2, the Cascade Bay Stroller Policy was directed to the April 9 workshop for further review and
3
discussion. This issue has previously been reviewed by the City Council, and directed to the Advisory
Park Commission. The Commission recommended the policy be retained. Staff remains concerned
about a change to the current policy that would create obstacles to swim and pool safety, as well as to
occupant of strollers.
Attached on pages ~ through ~ for City Council review is a copy of the past minutes from the
City Council and the Advisory Commission in regards to this issue.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide direction regarding the Cascade Bay Stroller Policy.
SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATE ON LOCATIONS FOR SOCCER FIELDS
The subcommittee examining sites for a soccer field complex met on Tuesday, April 2 to review
different sites identified by the committee and staff. The committee also discussed the possibility of a
joint soccer complex with the City of Inver Grove Heights and possibly with the City of Rosemount.
The subcommittee will share their findings with the City Council as a whole at the meeting on Tuesday.
For a copy of the maps that were shared with the subcommittee, refer to pages ~ through ~.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide direction to the subcommittee regarding locations for soccer fields.
PART III 2002-2007 PARKS CIP
At the last Special City Council work session, the Part III 2002-2007 Parks CIP was presented by the
Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission to the City Council. Following the presentation and
discussion between members of the Commission and City Council, there was direction to bring the six
(6) year CIP back to the City Council for additional review and consideration at the April work session.
Enclosed on pages ~ through ~ is another copy of the Part III 2002-2007 Parks CIP as
presented at the March work session.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide direction regarding the 2002-2007 Parks CIP.
FUNDING OPTIONS FOR STORM MITIGATION
The City's Finance Committee will be meeting before the Tuesday Special City Council meeting to
review options for financing the balance of the storm mitigation improvements beyond the $5,000,000
provided by the State Grant. Information and the results of the Finance Committee meeting will be
presented at the Special City Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide direction in determining a funding source for the balance of the storm mitigation projects
being undertaken by the City.
OTHER BUSINESS
There aze no items for other business at this time.
/s/Thomas L. Hedges
City Administrator
S
¢~~>..
.4 j~~ may' -
~~ -~~~.`
city of eoc~an
WESCOTT SQUARE
PATRICIA E. Au:ADA REDEVELOPMENT
'\ta~~or
~ Request for Qualifications/Proposal
PAliL BAI<1CEti ~
PEGGYCARLCON i The Project
CYNDEE FIELDS ~ The Eagan City Council has expressed interest in redevelopment opportunities in the
MEG TILLEY ~ Wescott Squaze neighborhood. Redevelopment is of particular interest because of
previous and ongoing investments by the City to maintain Wescott Squaze as a viable and
Council Members
I successful neighborhood, without long-term need for significant contribution of City
resources.
THOMAS HEDGES
~
CiryAdminisvator j Background
~ The neighborhood has, in recent years, experienced disinvestments that are obvious in the
appeazance and condition of properties. Numerous units are showing disrepair that
violates City Code in regard to the maintenance of siding, roofs, etc.
Municipal Center: ~
~
Additionally, the City has committed resources to the neighborhood for a number of
3s3o Pilot Knob Road yeazs through its Pazks and Recreation Department. A portion of the City's annual
Eagan, MN 55122-189? i allocation of the Community Development Block Grant funding has been directed toward
the neighborhood to address extraordinary community and social concerns. The City has
Phone: 651.681.4600 ~
i tracked and responded to an inordinate number of police calls for service to the area. In
Fax: 651.681.4612 ~ June 2000, the City opened a Police sub-station in the neighborhood, the only of its kind
TDD: 651.454.8535 ' in the City.
To a great decree, the issues in the neighborhood that have driven the City to commit
Maintenance Facility: I significant financial resources aze a result of the current ownership structure. There are
3501 Coachman Point ~ multiple ov~mers of the 120-unit development. There appeazs to be no cohesive property
management policy in place and no consistency in maintenance and repair, tenant
Eagan. MN ss 122 I services and relations, or other management practices typically in place for such a sizable
Phone: 651.681.4300 i development.
Fax: 651.681.4360
TDD: 651.454.8535 i Desired Outcome
i The City is interested in a redevelopment project that meets the following objectives:
1. Provides for consistent property management that includes, but is not limited to;
www.ciryofeagan.com ~ a comprehensive maintenance and repair plan and budget, a willingness to
! participate in the City's Crime Free Multi-Housing program, and the offering of
neighborhood support services or community programming.
2. Successful redevelopment that would resolve issues that have prompted and
continue to necessitate the apparent long-term commitment of City financial
THE LOl`E OAKTREE i sources.
' The symbol of svength j
and growth in our
community' ~ '
W
Wescott Square RFQ/P
January 18, 2002
Page 2 of 2
Request for Qvalifications/Proposal
Please provide to the City of Eagan five (5) copies of materials responding to the items
below:
A statement of qualifications including:
a. Names, addresses and descriptions of other developments owned or managed.
b. Descripti~~, of icga. i,a,i, of ucraiupc;;~ulupd-iy, ancL'o~ iuCntification of
owners of property.
c. Names, addresses of principals of company.
d. Financial background including description of financing capabilities and at
least three references.
e. A general description of the proposed improvements for the project, including
potential funding methods.
2. The proposed timetable for preparation of a final redevelopment plan.
3. Property management plans including sample budget:- Plan should include tenant
selection criteria, sample contracts, staff requirements, maintenance plan and
reserves. Plans for comparable properties are acceptable.
f
4. Residents support services plan. Plan should include programming, facilities, and
opportunities that will be made available to Wescott residents.
Deadline for RFP submittals: February I5, 2002
Please address submittals to:
James Verbrugge, Assistant City Administrator
City of Eagan
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
7
""03715iUY ~a:zu rP.A va~~c~~w~ oYK11u~1LU 11V1:.
85 E. SEvEKTH PLACE, Sl]ITE 100
Snt~? PnUL, MN 5.5101-?887
~s~-'a23"300° FAx: ~si.zz3.3oo? SPRINGSTED
~~ AJvi.rurr to thr Yubll,~ .';raur
EXTERNAL MEMORANDUM
r-
TO: VanOverbeke and s Verbrugge, City of Eagan
FROM: acGill~ y and B 'morel r
DATE: March 14, 2002
SUBJECT: Wescott Square Redevelopment Proposals
~ 002
The City of Eagan asked Springsted Incorporated to review the quai'rfications and proposals
submitted by CommonBond Communities and JS Partnership for the redevelopment of the
Wescott Square apartment project. Because the Request for Qualifications/Proposal (RFQ/P)
did not ask for full proposal packages (including developer financial statements, development
budgets, operating proforrnas, and specific financing plans), the two proposals differed in the
information provided. We have prepared the attached side-by-side summary of components to
assist the Ciry In comparing the CommonBond and JS Partnership materials. The two most
significant differences between the proposals regard:
1. Long-term affordability and services for low-income households;
2. Organisation size, experience, and resources.
Affordabili#y and Services
The CommonBond proposal is designed to ensure the "long-term affordability of a valuable
community resource.° Through housing tax credits, state and county loanlgrent funds, City
assistance, and other resources, CommonBond intends to rehabilitate and manage Wescott
Square Into a quality environment for households primarily at or below 509'0 of area median
income. CommonBond would provide on-site resident services through its AdvantageCenter
program. Adult, youth, and community programs would be financed with other CommonBond
resources and foundatioNdonor support.
The JS Partnership proposal is designed to transition Wescott Square from a predominantly
low-income property to amixed-income property. It anticipates using many of the same funding
sources as the CommonBond project, but through quality renovation, management, and unit
turnover, hopes to achieve a 50/50 split between low-income and moderate-income (including
unrestricted income) households. JS Partnership intends to develop a community center for
resident services and activities, but would rely on outside organizations to provide most service
programming and funding.
CORP(IRAYC OFFICE: SAWf PAUL MN .Visit our wcbsire u www.~pringstai_eom
I(rMA • K!,?ISAS • M1IVKESGTA • ~ t~ASHltt~l'ON,DC • w13CONSL"T
_ vv .v v. ~. v~.~i..t/y~ VV1 ~1~lJV Vi _ ~ ~ /t. .. v.Ila.v a.\v. ~VUJ
City of Eagan, Minnesota
March 14, 2002
Page 2
Organisation
CommonBond Communities and JS Partnership also differ in size, experience, and resources.
CommonBond is the largest nonprofit developer and manager of affordable housing in
Minnesota. It has approximately 1y0 employees and is governed by a board of 34 directors. It
has developed and rehabilitated 3,160 rental units and has another 185 under development in
2002-2003. It manages 44 properties housing 4,700 residents. It is affiliated with the
Archdiocese of 5t. Paul and Minneapolis and, according to its website, "receives support from
many corporations, foundations, religious organizations, civic groups, and individuals".
JS Partnership consists of general partners Jeffrey Johnson and John Sowards, plus one limited
partner. Mr. Johnson has developed 51 rental units and over 100 for-sale homes, and has
consulted on numerous projects for governmental and nonprofit housing providers. He also
manages 113 rental units, including 52 units at Wescott. Mr. Sowards reports no development
experience, but manages 36 units at Wescott, including 24 units that he owns. The partners
report substantial personal net worth and have mapped out a renovation financing plan, but do
not have external resources to provide operating or programming support.
Analysts
There are szvera! organizational differences between the developers that could be the basis for
a City decision. The first issue to consider, however, is whether the Clty prefers one
redevelopment and management proposal over the other. Does the City want the developer to
keep most Wescott units affordable for low-income households and offer an integrated resident
service pragrarn, or does it want the developer to attract moderate-Income households to
roughly 50% of the units and implement a more open system of multiple service providers? _
The result of this Council policy decision could affect the foundation of any recommendation on
this process.
fn its RFQ/P, the City listed four objectives for the successful redevelopment and consistent
management of Wescott Square:
1. A comprehensive maintenance and repair plan and budget;
2. A willingness 20 participate in the City's Crime Free Multi-Housing Program;
3. The offering of neighborhood support services or community programming;
4. Resolution of issues that have prompted and continue to necessitate the apparent
long-term commitment of City financial resources.
Maintenance and Repair: The proposals appear comparable on this goal. JS Partnership
anticipates spending more for operating costs and ongoing repair and replacement than does
CommonBond. It is unclear whether this difference represents a higher level of maintenance by
JS Partnership or the economies of scale and outside resources that Commonl3ond possesses.
to any case, both maintenance estimates are reasonable for this property type.
Crime Free Multi-Housing Program: The program requires property managers to conduct a
criminal background check on all prospective tenants, use the "Crime Free Lease Addendum',
and to attend a training session sponsored by the Police Department. In its letter of submittal,
CommonBond states that it will participate in the program. JS Partnership does not address the
program in its proposal.
9
City of Eagan, Minnesota
March 14, 2002
Page 3
Neighborhood Support Services: The proposals differ most significantly on this objective.
CommonBond's Advantage Centers develop and provide programming for adults, youth,
families, and the residential community as a whole. JS Partnership proposes to provide a
community center and ma'.srials for use by a variety of outside service providers. Although a
less integrated service model may be Compatible with JS Partnership's proposed
deconcentration of low-income residents, ComrnonBond's one-source approach appears to
offer the direct accountability and visibility that the City desires. The JS Partnership response in
this area relating to "outside service providers" could Include Ilia City. If so, this situation could
reduce the likelihood of the City achieving its fourth objective of reduced or no financial
participation.
Long-term Financial Commitment: As was stated above the RFP/Q did not request definitive
information on the financial aspects of the proposals. Therefore, no definitive finding on these
criteria can be made from the responses. Both proposals indicate the participation of numerous
public entities, including the City, in the capital financing program. Neither tfieir submissions nor
their representations indicate that commitments by these public entities have been secured.
The City has indicated that it would like to reduce the amount of CDBC3. Police, Parks and
Recreation, and other resources that it dedicates to Wescott each year. Both developers
submitted detailed management plans and tenant selection criteria, but neither respondent
addresses how it would reduce or eliminate the City's ongoing participation. It will take several
years of quality redevelopment and management before the City can fully measure its success
in meeting this objective. From the information provided, however, it is apparent that
CommonBond has more experience and resources than JS Partnership for the rehabilitation
and management of large affordable housing properties. It may be helpful to contact officials In
other cities to see how similar properties owned and/or managed by CommonBond and the JS
Partnership principals are performing.
Conclusion
The City established four criteria upon which responses to the RFP/Q were to be evaluated. 4n
criteria involving Maintenance and Long-term reductions in the City financial participation, the
respondents are either equally qualified or both IacK sufficient information to determine any
differential. As to the criteria involving the City's "Crime Free" Multi-housing Program,
CommonBond makes a definitive statement as to its participation, while the JS Partnership
proposal does not address its commitment. Regarding the criteria on offering support services
and community programming, CornmonBond not only commits to providing such a program, but
has a successful track record in this area in their other projects. This area also may impact the
Ciry'S ability to reduce its ongoing financial participation. Under this criterion, CommonBond's
response better meets the City's objectives. Based on the criteria, where a discernable
difference exists, the CommonBond response better addresses the City's criteria.
From the RFP/Q we were provided, we are unsure if the City places greater priority on certain
criteria than on others. Given the responses, information on all crlterfa was not received. In the
following section on "Next Steps" we propose an approach which permits the City to proceed
with the process white increasing its confidence that all City objectives can be managed to an
acceptable level.
~D
Ciry of Eagan, Minnesota
March 14, 2002
Page 4
Next Steps
If the City decides to proceed with one proposal, it may be advisable to award tentative
developer status and instruct the designated developer to prepare a final redevelopment plan,
including budgets, financing structures, and proformas. Tentative developer status gives the
developer an incentive to prepare final plans and financing structures, but allows the developer
and City to withdraw if the parties cannot ultimately agree on City assistance or other project
details.
1f the City decides that it needs more information before proceeding to tentative developer
status, the next step would be to instruct both developers to prepare a final redevelopment plan,
or at least to provide additional details on project improvements, construction costs, financing
sources, and other factors_
Whichever course the City selects, Springsted is prepared to assist in evaluating redevelopment
plans and developer ca~3bllities for achieving the proposed outcome. We have substantial
experience in reviewing developer financ(al statements, references, project performance,
development budgets, financing structures, operating proformas, and other materials that
illustrate the overall viability of a redevelopment plan. Both developers fndiCate they will ask the
City for some 18vo1 of assistance in financing the redevelopmer~: project. Through a careful
analysis of the project components, Springsted can help the City determine what level and
terms of assistance are needed to get the project none.
We appreciate the opportunity to be Of assistance and look forward to discussing next steps
with you. fn the meantime, please feel free to call us at (651) 2Z3-3000 with any questions.
Thank you.
fl
_- -- _ ~ ... .VI.IaLY as\V.
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Summary of Developer Qualifications and Proposals for
Wescott Square Redevelopment and Management Services
DeveloNar's
Summary of
Proposed Protect
Description of
Legal Bests
Principals of
Company
Properties under
Management
Development
History
Financial
Background
Common
S
D
-
-
D
v
-
Acquire all 30 properties
Rehabilitate properties to correct
deferred maintenance and cure
obsolescence
Develop site offices, community room,
and other common spaces
Provide quality management and
maintenance
Provide resident support services
through an Advantage Geni2r
Ensure long-term affordability (goal is
to maintain units affordable to
residents at/beiow 50% of AMI)
Y
y
n
v
v
IQ 006
Acquire alt 30 properties and repeat
into one parcel
Renovate and improve properties
Professional manage the propert~~s
Transfer park to private ownership
Develop community center for use by
outside resident service providers
provide 60 units to very low/low
income households for 30 years
Provide 56 units to moderate income
households (30 with unrestricted
Incomes) within 5 years
Maintain ownership for 30 years
CommonBond Communities, a
i501(c)(3) not-for-profit corporation
Governed by Board of Directors (34
directors) and Advisory Boards
Joseph Errigo, President
Joseph Holmberg, SVP and COO
Douglas Mayo, Director of
Development (contact)
CommonBond manages 44 affordable
rental properties with over 4,700
residents (1,300 children, 1,100
adults, 2,300 seniors)
CommonBond has developed and
renovated 3,345 units, including 185
units in development for 2002-2003
Submitted independent audit through
June 30, 2000
Total net assets of 53.2 million, after
depreciation (6/30/2000 audit)
- JS Partnership, a Minn. Partnership
- Govemed py ~erirey Johnson and
John Sowards, Individua! Sponsors
r Jeffrey Johnson, General Partner and
Chief Financial Officer (contact)
- John Sowards, General Partner and
Chief Operating Officer
Y Johnson manages 5 properties with
115 units, including 52 Wescott units
- Sowards manages 36 Wescott units,
24 of which he owns
- Johnson has developed 51 r®ntal
units and over 100 for-sale homes,
consulted on numerous projects
- Sowards reports no housing
development experience
- Submitted no financial statements
(City RFC~/P did not request)
- Proposal states: 'The Individual
Sponsors have a combined net worth
of more than $3,000,000."
Financing >~ Submitted no other discussion of - Submitted no other discussion of
Capabilities developer "financing capabilities" developer "financing capabilities"
I References ~ - List includes Western Bank, Briggs 8~ - List includes Anoka County CAP,
Morgan, assorted creditors Wells Fargo, MHFA, other contacts
Prepared by Springsted Jncorporated (printed on 03/' "^"'
1:~
03/15/02 09:21 FAX 6512233002 - SPRI1rGST'ED IIrC. ._ X007
Ciry of Eagan, Minnesota
Summary of Wescott Square Redevelopment Proposals
Page 2
Proposed - Correct deferred maintenance and - Correct siding, asphalt, curb, parking,
Improvemsnts cure obsolescence landscaping, front entries, overhead
:- Develop site offices, community room, garage doors, decks, roofs, windows
Class rooms, common areas - Develop community center
- Estimated budget of $16-17 million
Potential Fun~:r.,; ~a;:ota County CDA -Housing Tax Y ~wL~:~ C=only CDA -Housing Tax
Methods Credits Credits of $75,000
(Funding sources D MHFA - AHIF first mortgage D MHFA - LMIR first mortgage of
are developer - Metropolitan Council -Local Housing $11.5 million
estimates only. No Incentive Fund - MHFA -Deferred mortgage of
funds haw been
approved by the - Dakota County CDA -HOME grant $1 million
autfiorizing y C of Ea an -Funds TBD
~ g - City of Eagan -Deferred loan of
agencies.)
A
Deferred Developer Fees $500,000
D (City RFQ/P did not request estimated ~' Dakota County CDA -HOPE grant of
sources and uses of funds) $250,000
- Dakota County CDA -HOME grant of
$250, 000
t FHLB -Grant of $200,000
Y Owners -Equity of $2,500,000
- Deferred Developer Fees - $600,000
Proposed D Did not answer question directly - Did not answer question directly
Timetable for f Estimated schedule from April 2002 Y Estimated schedule from April 2002
Preparation of through June 2005, assuming through June 2003, assuming
Final Plan designation and eminent domain designation by April 2002
authorizat'son by Aprii 2002
Property Y Estimated operating budget of - Estimated FY 2003 operating budget
Management - $469,440 (93,912 per unit). of $504,000 ($4,200 per unit)
Sample Operating y Attached FY 2000 budget for Yorkdale - Submitted 5-year Wescott operating
Budget Townhornes - $4,387 per unit, before proforma with income and debt
repairJreplacement reserves service estimates
Tenant Selection D MHFA-approved tenant plan for i J.A. Management tenant application
Criteria Yorkdale Townhomes (April 1996) process and rental criteria
Semple Contracts D Sample management agreement for D No management agreement included
CornmonBond as management agent in proposal
Staff Requirements D 1.5 FTE for Administration and Y John Sowards, Property Mgmt Agent
Management y Resident Manager
D 1-1.5 FTE for Maintenance Y Maintenance Engineer
y i FTE On-site Caretaker - Secretary
D On-Site Caretakers
Maintenance Ptan Y Marketing and Management Plan D Marketing and Management Plan
(including maintenance) for Wescott {including maintenance) for Wescott
Prepared by Springsted Incorporated (printed on 03 '~
-- -~ ~~ ~a:cc r.se- as1ZZ3a002 SPRIIv6STED INC; X008
City of Eagan, Minnesota
Summary of Wescott Square Redevelopment Proposals
Page 3
Reserves - $300 per unit per year, total of - $500 per unit per year, total of
$36,000 in repair/replacement $60,000 in repair/replacement
Y Internal funding available "rf necessary
Resident Support ~ Detailed Advantage Services Plan t Provide community center and
Services Plan, - Adu{ts -Career Advantage, computer materials for use by Parks and Rec_,
including classes, parenting gruuNS Dakota County CDA and CAC, other
programming, y Youths -Homework Center, summer outside resident service providers
facilities and recJlunches, computers, Scouts - Expect need for everyday servicas for
cpportunitiQS first 5 years, to be ovaluated aftor
y Community -Resident association, convers'son to mixed-Income property
newsletter, potlucks, events
Prepared by Springsted incorporated (printed on "'^?)
~~
~Sp Aviation Nose
1,
flue Ribbon Pane
MSP Aviation Noise Blue Ribbon Panel Report to the
Metropolitan Airports Commission Regarding a New MSP
Airport Noise Oversight Committee Framework
D~F~
MSP Aviation Noise Blue Ribbon Panel
Apri12002
~~
BACKGROUND
For more than 30 years at the Minneapolis - St. Paul International (MSP) airport the
Metropolitan Aircraft Sound Abatement Council (MASAC) provided an airport noise
forum comprised of an equal number of community and airport user representatives. On
October 31, 2000, the airline members resigned from the Council citing concerns that the
organization had become an unbalanced community advocacy group. Concerns focused
on the Council's ability to address airport noise issues in a manner that considered all
interests and applicable Federal policies. Due to the resignation of the airlines from the
Council, the organization was disbanded.
A Blue Ribbon Panel was established to develop a new MSP noise committee
framework. Three community and three airport user representatives were appointed by
their respective constituencies to serve on the Panel. The community members on the
Panel were Barret Lane - a member of the Minneapolis City Council, Jamie Verbrugge -
Eagan's Assistant City Administrator, and Jill Smith -former member of the Mendota
Heights City Council. The airport user members on the Panel were John DeCoster -
Northwest Airlines Regional Director of Airport Affairs, Bob Johnson -member of the
Minnesota Business Aviation Association, and Pete Levermore -UPS Airport Properties
Representative.
The Panel discussed several topics related to the specific elements associated with a new
organizational framework that addressed both airport user and community concerns. The
topics discussed focused on organizational mission, procedures/rules of order, the
Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) role, staffing roles and responsibilities and
the reporting relationship and responsibilities in the MAC's process.
The Panel began their deliberations on December 18, 2001 and concluded on
Throughout the course of _ meetings, the Panel unanimously agreed that an MSP noise
committee is critical to the effective development and operation of a major urban airport
like MSP.
The Panel developed the attached MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee framework
and associated bylaws.
i~
~iSP AIRPQ~`
i ~
1
AtOISE OKERSIGHT COJY~fIFTEE
Recommended Framework for the New
MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee (MANOC)
~ Organizational Mission
Provide a balanced forum for the discussion and evaluation of noise impacts
around Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport through the following
functions:
^ Identify, study and analyze airport noise issues
^ Provide policy recommendations or options to the MAC Planning
and Environment Committee and full Commission regarding
airport noise issues
^ Monitor compliance with established noise policy at MSP
^ Ensure the collection of information and dissemination to the
public.
The above functions will be conducted in a manner that considers public and
airport user concerns, taking into consideration public input/information from
the following channels of communication:
^ MAC noise office
^ MAC Noise Program Web site
^ MSP Noise News newsletter
^ MAC noise complaint and information hotline
^ Governmental body official policy development processes
^ MAC public hearings
^ MAC informational meetings
^ Individual MANOC members
^ MAC Planning and Environment Committee
^ Metropolitan Airports Commission meetings.
' ~7
~ Membership
o The Committee will have ten members with five airport user
representatives and five community representatives
o Community representation will be defined as those communities within or
touched by the most recently developed and submitted Part 150 65 DNL
contour.
o The airport user airline and pilot members will be determined by the MSP
Airport Airlines Affairs Committee (AAAC), with one vote to each of the
following - a scheduled air carrier, charter carrier, cargo operator, a chief
pilot of an operator at MSP and the Minnesota Business Aviation
Association (MBAR). MBAA will appoint their representative.
o Both airport user and community representatives must be vested to
represent their constituency and vote accordingly.
o If a member vacancy occurs, the respective constituency will appoint a
replacement.
o An alternate member will be appointed by each member organization.
Alternates will only be allowed to represent their respective organization
in the absence of the primary designee.
o Members will be appointed for a term of two years.
~ Procedures/Rules of Order
o Robert's Rules of Order will be the governing doctrine for conduct of
business and membership participation behavior. The Committee may also
adopt other rules necessary for the governance of Committee's conduct of
business. A rule can only be amended or suspended by a vote oftwo-thirds
of the full Committee.
o Meetings will be scheduled every other month, as determined by the
Committee. Meetings will be held if workload business necessitates.
Meetings shall be conducted quarterly at a minimum, unless two-thirds of
the members vote not to have a meeting.
o Prior to every meeting, a Committee member briefing session will be
conducted.
o Meetings will be held during business hours at the MAC General Offices.
o Agendas will be prepared with the consent of both of the co-chairs and
distributed at least two weeks prior to the meeting. To vote on an item it
must be on the agenda. Items can be added to the agenda for discussion by
atwo-thirds vote of the members.
o All votes required for the passage of a motion will require a quorum as
defined by a majority (one greater than half) of both the community and
airport user segments of the organization.
o For the purpose of conducting business, at least half of the full Committee
members must be in attendance. Attendance includes meeting
participation via conference call or by a designated alternate.
IS
o Sub-Committees will be established on an as needed basis as determined
by the organization as a whole, and shall be comprised of people with the
expertise or vested interest in the area of discussion, with a date certain
completion time. Sub-Committees shall be provided a defined task to
accomplish and a timeframe within which to complete the task. The
composition of Sub-Committees shall be an equal balance of airport user
and community representatives.
o Special meetings can be called by the Committee as a whole or by the
mutual consent of the co-chairs.
~ Metropolitan Airports Commission Role
o MAC staff shall act as a technical advisor to the Committee.
o MAC Commissioners are invited to attend each meeting and participate in
discussions, but are not eligible to vote.
o Annual work plans will be developed in consultation with the MAC
Planning and Environment Committee. The work plan will be submitted
annually to the Metropolitan Airports Commission for informational
purposes.
o MAC staff will sponsor quarterly information and comment meetings for
the general public. The meetings will be held in the evening hours at the
MAC General Offices. Committee members are invited to attend these
meetings.
o A summary of the information from the infonnationaUcomment meetings
will be provided to the Committee.
~ Staffing Roles and Responsibilities
o The MAC staff will receive direction from the Committee with regard to
staff development of technical documents, analyses and information
requests.
o MAC staff will provide administrative and technical support to the
organization in an unbiased manner with equal access to all members.
~* Reporting Relationship and Responsibility in MAC's Process
o Actions by the Committee will be forwarded to the MAC Planning and
Envirorunent Committee for review, and forwarded to the full
Commission.
o The co-chairs will provide a report to the MAC Planning and Environment
Committee on an annual basis.
o Each member will be responsible for reporting to his or her respective
appointing authority.
°19
~ Additional Elements
o Co-Chairmanshrn: One primary representative from user side and one
from the community side will be selected by their respective
constituencies to serve as co-chairpersons within the Committee. The
presiding chairperson will alternate every other meeting.
o Advisor~Functions: Advisory functions to the Committee include the
Federal Aviation Administration, Air Transport Association, Minnesota
Air National Guard, the U.S. Air Force and the Metropolitan Council.
5 •~e~
Ili~~~ill
BYLAWS
MSP Airport Noise Oversight Committee (MANOC)
ARTICLE I
Committee Mission
Provide a balanced forum for the discussion and evaluation of noise impacts around
Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport through the following functions:
o Identify, study and analyze airport noise issues and solutions
o Provide policy recommendations or options to the MAC Planning and
Environment Committee and full Commission regarding airport noise issues
o Monitor compliance with established noise policy at MSP
o Ensure the collection of information and dissemination to the public.
The above functions will be conducted in a manner that considers public and airport
user concerns, taking into consideration public inputlinformation from the following
channels of communication:
o MAC noise office
o MAC Noise Program Web site
o MSP Noise News newsletter
o MAC noise complaint and information hotline
o Governmental body official policy development processes
o MAC public hearings
o MAC informational meetings
o Individual MANOC members
o MAC Planning and Environment Committee
o Metropolitan Airports Commission meetings.
ARTICLE II
Membership
1. The Committee membership shall consist of ten officially designated
representatives or, in the absence of designated representatives, the alternative
representatives, with authority to act upon all matters within the purview of the
Bylaws.
bal
2. The airport users and communities shall have an equal number of members and
votes on the Committee.
The MSP Airport Airline Affairs Committee shall make airline and pilot
appointments, except for MBAR.
4. Community representation will be defined as those communities within or
touched by the most recently developed and submitted Part 150 65 DNL contour.
The respective appointing authority shall file with the MAC the designated
representative and alternate, setting forth their names and mailing address.
Thereupon, representation on the Committee will be confirmed by issuance of a
certificate of membership to each such representative and/or alternate
representative.
6. Representatives and alternate representatives shall be appointed to serve for two
(2) years. Alternates will only be allowed to represent their respective
organization in the absence of the primary designee.
7. The composition of the Committee is as follows:
USER REPRESENTATION
1 -Scheduled airline representative
1 -Cargo carrier representative
1 -Charter operator representative
1 -Chief Pilot representative
1 -Minnesota Business Aviation Association (NIBAA) representative
CITY REPRESENTATION
1 -City of Minneapolis representative
1 - City of Richfield representative
1 - City of Mendota Heights representative
1 -City of Bloomington representative
1 - City of Eagan representative
8. Input maybe sought from organizations or agencies that deal directly with aircraft
noise abatement programs to include: Air Transport Association of America
(ATA), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Minnesota Air National Guard,
U.S. Air Force Reserve, MAC, Metropolitan Council and any other organization
or agency with majority approval by the Committee.
as
ARTICLE III
Powers and Duties of Membership
Subject to the voting provisions herein set forth, the membership shall have the
following powers and duties:
1. Both airport user and community appointed members must be vested to represent
their constituency and vote accordingly.
ARTICLE N
Voting Rights of Membership
At all meetings of the Committee, attendance by three (3) airport user
representatives and three (3) community representatives shall constitute a quorum
for voting/action purposes. For the purpose of conducting meetings, at least half,
five (5), of the Committee members must be in attendance. Attendance includes
meeting participation via conference call.
2. There shall be equal representation of airport user and community membership on
the Committee, and to that end, for purposes of voting on all matters requiring a
vote of the Committee, each representative, both user and community, shall have
one (1) vote, which in the absence of a representative may be his or her duly
designated alternate representative.
3. These Bylaws may be amended or altered by the vote of a super majority of the
membership present at any meeting, provided that notice of such proposed
amendments shall have been given fourteen (14) days prior to a general
membership meeting.
ARTICLE V
Co-Chairpersons
The airport user and community segments of the Committee shall each select a Co-
Chairperson. Each Co-Chairperson will serve for a two (2) year term or until his/her
representation on the Committee terminates, whichever occurs first.
The powers and duties of the Co-Chairpersons aze as follows:
1. To review and approve agendas -approval by both of the co-chairs is required for
agenda approval.
2. To preside over meetings -the presiding Chairperson will alternate every other
meeting.
8 a3
3. By the mutual consent of the Co-Chairpersons, special meetings maybe called, or
upon request of a majority of the Committee, three (3) users and three (3)
community representatives.
4. To sign as Co-Chairpersons of this Committee, all instruments in writing that may
require such signature, unless the membership shall otherwise direct, and to
perform such other duties and tasks as these Bylaws or as the membership shall
from time to time prescribe.
ARTICLE VI
Technical Advisor
The Manager of the MAC Aviation Noise and Satellite Programs office will act as the
Technical Advisor to the Committee. The Technical Advisor shall perform the
following functions:
1. To prepare the agenda for meetings of the Committee, which shall include any
items for considerations proposed to him/her by any airport user or community
representative with the consent of at least one Co-Chairperson.
2. To keep a full and complete record of the proceedings of the Committee and of
the meetings of the members.
3. To maintain an up-to-date roster of Committee membership and of the
representatives of each member corporation, association, governmental body and
unit including the date of appointment and time of service of each representative.
He/she shall inform each member as to the termination of the term of service of
each representative, no less than sixty (60) days prior to such termination.
4. To make service and publication of all notices that may be necessary or proper.
In the case of absence of the Technical Advisor or the Committee's Designee to
make service or publication of any notice then such notice may be signed, served
and published by the Co-Chairpersons or, in the absence of one of the Co-Chairs,
by one of the Co-Chairpersons, or by any person thereunto authorized by any of
them or by the Committee.
ARTICLE VII
Technical Studies
The Committee at its own determination, by a majority vote, or at the request of
the Technical Advisor, may retain the services of independent technical experts
and consultants as deemed necessary in the performance of the Committee's
functions.
9a~-
2. All services that are retained for the purpose of supporting Committee initiatives
will be conducted within the budgetary limits of the MAC Aviation Noise and
Satellite Programs Office.
3. In aid of the Committee's mission, the Committee may ask agencies,
corporations, associations, and governmental bodies to make available to the
Committee technical advice, and the services of their technical personnel
reasonably required for the purpose of studies instituted by the Committee.
4. Studies and reports of technical personnel retained by the Committee for such
purpose shall be available to the Committee in aid of its performance of its
functions but shall not constitute studies or reports of the Committee unless duly
adopted by it.
ARTICLE VIII
Committee Meetings
1. Meeting will be scheduled every other month (odd numbered months) -day to be
determined by the Committee. Meetings will be held if workload business
necessitates as mutually determined by the Co-chairpersons. If any regular
meeting day falls on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday, then the meeting shall occur
on the next business day thereafter. Special meetings of the Committee shall be
established through the mutual consent of the Co-Chairpersons or by a majority
vote of the Committee.
2. Prior to every meeting, a Committee member briefing session will be conducted.
3. The Technical Advisor or the Committee's designee shall distribute notice of
general or special meetings of the Committee at least two (2) weeks prior to the
meeting to each representative at his/her mailing address currently on file with the
MAC. Such notice shall set forth the agenda of the meetings and no matters
requiring Committee action may be considered which aze not on the agenda
unless the Committee, by a super majority vote of representatives in attendance,
elects to consider such matters. Each Committee agenda will include a review of
any comment trends, topics or issues raised via the Committee's recognized
channels of communication.
4. All meetings shall be held during business hours at the general offices of the
MAC or at such other place or places as from time to time the Committee by
majority vote of representation in attendance at a meeting determines. The place
of meeting or alternative place of meeting shall be set forth in notices of meeting.
logs
ARTICLE IX
Sub-Committees
Sub-Committees will be established on an as needed basis as determined by the
organization as a whole, and will be comprised of people with the expertise or a
vested interest in the area of discussion, with a date certain completion time. Sub-
committees shall be provided a defined task to accomplish and a timeframe within
which to complete the task. The composition of Sub-Committees will always be an
equal balance of airport user and community representatives.
ARTICLE X
Procedures and Rules of Order
Robert's Rules of Order will be the governing doctrine for conduct of business and
membership participation behavior. The Committee may also adopt other rules
necessary for the governance of Committee's conduct of business. A rule can only be
amended or suspended by a vote of two thirds of the full Committee.
ARTICLE XI
Reporting Relationship and ResponsibilitYin MAC's Process
1. Annual work plans will be developed in consultation with the MAC Planning and
Environment Committee. The work plan will be submitted annually to the
Metropolitan Airports Commission for informational purposes.
2. Actions by the Committee will be forwarded to the MAC Planning and
Environment Committee for review, and forwarded to the full Commission.
3. The Co-Chairs will provide a report to the MAC Planning and Environment
Committee on an annual basis.
4. Each member will be responsible for reporting to his or her respective appointing
authority.
lla~
BUftNSVILLE EAGAN SAVAGE
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 191
Administrative Services Center • (952) 707-2005 • Fax (952) 707-2002
100 River Ridge Court • Burnsville, Minnesota 5533?
February 27, 2002 Superintendent of Schools
isi-o2as
Tom Hedges, Ciry Administrator
City of Eagan
?830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122-1897
1 e. N
Dear M~Ijetlges,
As you know, Independent School District 191 is facing a projected budget deficit for 2002-2003 in the
amount of $5.7 million. This projected deficit is m large measure the result of a negligible increase in state
funding combined with the failure of the district's levy referendum this past November.
In response, the Board of Education has directed that a plan be developed to reduce expenditures for next
year in the amount of $5.5 million. "l hat plan, in preliminary form, was accepted by the Board at its regular
meeting on February 7 (copy enclosed). Final approval of the budget reduction plan is scheduled for March
7.
As you can see, the proposed reductions will have a dramatic impact on all aspects of school district
operations for the coming year. Regular teaching positions will be lost, valued services will be curtailed, and
the number of support and security personnel will be dramatically reduced. And it is for this last reason that
I write you today.
State statute permits the school district to access fiords to pay for expenditures in the areas of safety and
security. These funds, generated under what is called the Crime Levy, are largely used to support the cost of
police liaison ofEcers and district-wide DARE programming for schools in each of the three communities we
serve. For Eagan, this amount is approximately $25,000.
The purpose of my letter is to request that the City of Eagan consider absorbing the above noted cost for
liaison officers and for DARE programming for the coming school year as a way of assisting the district in
our time of financial need. A positive response to this request wouid make it possi'oie for us to reallocate the
above noted resource thereby enabling us to continue to support the cost of existing security and supervisory
positions which would otherwise be lost for next year.
I know I speak for the Board in saying that the district values the on-going partnership that exists between the
district and the city of Eagan. While the above described request is unusual, these are unusual times. I hope
that you and council members will consider our request and respond to it favorably.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Yours truly,
B~n min J. Kanninen
Superintendent
cc: Board of Education
Kent Therkelsen
a~
An Equal Opportunin~ Employer
ISD 191 February 21, 2002
Budget Reduction Plan Draft #15
Revenue Enhancements $371,000
^ Increase fees (athletics/co-curricular/building use) 195,000
^ Transfer expenses to Community Education (4.0 FTE positions: communications/
partrterships/volunteers/Mraz Center/techno]ogy) 176,000
Miscellaneous $_277,000
^ Eliminate weekend use of facilities at District expense 15,000
o Reduce professional and Board member travel by 90% 20,000
^ Reduce membership costs (ECSU/Shared Decisions/Chamber) 12,000
o Eliminate discretionary job shares 50,000
^ Reduce substitute teacher costs 50,000
^ Implement additional energy conservation measures 30,000
^ Reduce insurance costs incurred by employees who are no longer able to work 100,000
Transportation 5650.000
o Eliminate noon kindergarten transportation (i.e., all day/every other day kinderga. yea) 200,000
o Increase walking distances (secondary only 1.5 miles) 125,000
^ Restructure transportation system from 3 tier to 4 tier 300,000
o Eliminate selected activity buses 25,000
Administrative and Support Services $969.120
o Reduce school based administrative support 281,120
o Reduce District administrative support 150,000
^ Reduce custodial, maintenance and grounds support 230,000
^ Reduce nursing/health services (reorganize services) 100,000
^ Eliminate funding for Family Support Workers 158,000
^ Reduce Curriculum Budget (l.0 FTE position/reduce curriculum writing) 50,000
Athletics and Co-curricular Activities $105,500
o Reduce ice time rental 7,000
^ Close BHS pool (.4 FTE position custodian/chemicals/utilities) 45,000
o Reduce junior high athletic and activities budgets 7,500
^ Eliminate one level from all " 3 level" high school sports (footbalUvolleybalUB&G
soccerB&G basketball/softball/baseball) 36,000
o Reduce high school co-curricular budgets 10,000
Otter Instruction $1,126,000
^ Reduce ESL Staffing at All Levels (3.5 FTE positions/increase student-teacher load) 154,000
^ Freeze Special Education Budget ($1,200,000 gross savings) (Eliminate reserve teachers 5.0
FTE positions/reduce resowce programs certified staff 11.0 FTE positions/increase student-
teachercase load /eliminate 15% of Management Educational Assistants workforce(30)) 600,000
o Eliminate District support for Reading Recovery staffing (1.5 FTE positions) 66,000
^ Adjust staffing f per October 1 enrollment (6.5 FTE positions) 286,000
^ Eliminate DARE Program 20,000
Teaching and Learning $2,142,800
o Reduce Elementary Staffing (27.0 FTE positions/specialists/media/resource/
class size) 1,034,000
^ Reduce Junior High Staffuzg (20.0 FTE positions/implement 6 period day/eliminate
equalization staffing) 642,400
^ Reduce High Schoo] Staffing (10.6 FTE positions/reduce electives offered/limit
registration beyond 5 courses/restrict number of students enrolled in certain electives/
increase class size/media) 466;400
Total Adjustment $5.641420
Definitions: FTE equals average full time equivalent cost (~44,()DO) .. ,~
MEMORANDUM
EAGAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
3830 Pilot Knob Road
Eagan, MN 55122
651-681-4700
651-681-4738 FAX
DATE: Apri15, 2002
TO: City Administrator Thomas Hedges
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Police Chief Kent Therkelsen
SUBJECT: DARE & School Resource Officer Funding
In a letter from Superintendent Benjamin Kanininen on February 27, 2002, School District #191
(Burnsville-Eagan-Savage) requested that the City of Eagan consider cone-time waiver of fees paid by
the District to the City for provision of DARE and School Resource Officer (SRO) programming. The
amount under consideration for the 2002/2003 school -year is $16,655.
Background:
• Minnesota School districts are authorized to collect a "crime levy" which is used to pay
expenditures related to school safety and security. Allowable expenditures include
reimbursement to cities for DARE and SRO services as well as certain building security
expenses. (Safety monitors, access controls, etc.). Districts also have other, miscellaneous funds
that provide revenue to DARE & SRO programs. I have attached a table showing what services
are provided and the funding contributions for DARE and SRO services from the various public
and private schools serving Eagan students.
• For the 2002/2003 school year, District #191 had planned on the following reimbursements to
the City of Eagan:
• $2,000 for DARE instruction at Rahn Elementary.
• $14,655 for SRO services at Metcalf Jr. High. (.375 FTE position, approximately $19,500
expense to City).
• $18,945 for SRO services at VALE Education Center.
• At their March 7, 2002 meeting, the District #191 Board of Education eliminated funding for the
DARE program throughout the District. ($2,000 impact for Eagan). The SRO funding was not
cut, howeveX, as stated above, the District has requested that the Cities of Eagan, Burnsville, and
Savage consider absorbing full SRO funding for one school year (2002/2003) to assist the
District's budget reduction effort.
Note: The SRO funding at VALE is not included in the request Federal grant obligations
require this funding to continue by District #191.
aq
Tom Hedges, Mayor & City Council
Apri15, 2002
Page Two
• The City of Savage has taken a position to not voluntarily accept loss of SRO revenue from
District #191. They will however, continue to provide DARE instruction at the three District
#191 elementary buildings in Savage in spite of the loss of crime levy money dedicated to
DARE. The City of Burnsville has not taken action on the request as of this date.
School Resource Officer Overview
e sc oo resource o icer program places police officers in all Eagan (public) secondary schools. We
currently have one officer assigned to Eagan High School/Dakota Hills Middle School., one officer at
Blackhawk Middle School/Metcalf Jr. High, and one officer at VALE education center. Since 1993 the
City of Eagan has provided financial support to the City of West St. Paul to provide a SRO at Henry
Sibley High School, which serves Eagan students. This payment is provided for in an agreement
approved by the City Council.
The SRO's primary focus is on crime issues involving their assigned school building or student crime
occurring elsewhere in Eagan. The officers also provide a valuable resource for school administrators,
teachers and students. Classroom presentations on a variety of topics is an important part of the SRO
program. Another valuable aspect of the SRO program is the access to information that the SROs enjoy
by working in the school environment.
For 2002, 80% of our wage and benefit costs (3 officers x 9 months per year} for Eagan PD SROs is
recouped in payments from the crime levy and the COPS in School grant. The 10% of the SRO wages
and benefits absorbed by the City is consistent with other communities and provides excellent return on
our investment in terms of more effective investigation of crime, positive relations with our secondary
students and staff, and the preventative value of having a police officer on the school campus.
DARE Overview
rug use Resistance Education) is a prevention program targeted primarily to 5th grade
students nationwide. In Eagan, DARE is taught at 8 District #196 schools, 1 District #191 school, and 3
private schools. A uniformed police officer spends an hour per week for 17 weeks in each class
teaching awareness of drugs, and strategies to help children resist participation in illegal drug, alcohol or
violent behavior. Existing research is in conflict over the long term effect of DARE on student
behavior. The feedback we receive from parents, the schools, and the students is overwhelmingly
positive. This year's Minnesota survey of 6tn, 9~h, and 12th graders showed downward trends in alcohol
and drug use by Minnesota students. District #196 seniors reported less illegal drug and alcohol use
than the statewide average. A high percentage of seniors that have remained drug and alcohol free cite
school-based prevention programs as an important factor in their decision-making.
In 2002, we estimate that 44% of our wage and benefit costs (1 officer x 52 weeks) for provision of the
DARE program will be recouped in payments from the crime levy, payments from private schools, and
payments derived from fines & forfeitures. Although this is a smaller percentage than we recoup in the
SRO program, it should be pointed out that police departments traditionally provide safety programming
to grade schools as part of their overall budget, and that the DARE officer presence in the grade schools
in drastically less intensive than the SRO presence in our secondary buildings.
Tom Hedges, Mayor & City Council
April 5, 2002
Page Three
Recommendation
I-Ti t o t e re atively minor dollar amount ($2,000) cut from District 191's budget for Eagan DARE
programming, I recommend that we continue to provide DARE instruction at Rahn Elementary next
year, rather than discontinue and then start up again if funding is restored for the 2003/2004 school year.
If funding is not restored we would most likely discontinue DARE services at Rahn School for school
~yeaz 2003/2004. However, I recommend that we not voluntazily accept the requested loss of SRO
funding from the crime levy for the 2002/2003 school yeaz.
I will be present at the April 9th City Council meeting to discuss this issue.
C/ Captain Richard Swanson
Captain James McDonald
31
W
U
Chi
Vl
W
w
O
V
O
M~
W
A
~,
e~
z~
~ o
W
W ~
C
O
E-~ N
U~
N
r+
~ CI O
6A O
d9 M
et 0
ffi 0
6R 0
5l4
w O
++ +~ ~
N
~ ~ ~
b 6~9
ati
U~
O
4~' 00
~
aV ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~'"'' "~ d d d d
N z z z 'z
O CO
N p„
y
i.
o ~,
~ Q N N
0
0
0
0
~ y
~ w.y
•." r,y
'~
c
~ o
y
a
O O O O
~+'
N O
N O
.--i ~
~ O
6R
U ~ `ss ~
A i,
N ~,
~~ d
~
z
~~
O ~
o p,{
N
~
~
A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
4.
o ~
r..l
•~
L
A ~ ® ~
O
~ ~.
w ++
~ nt
0
~ L
~..,
~ r.,
~ r,
~ «S
w as
H O
a
V
6~
0
d
0
v
y
C~
0
C
h
H
L
bD
~O
r
'~
O
O
V
0
"L1
0
~,
co.
a
O v
O ~
~.
•~ h
~ W
~ a
aA
® ~E
N
ri O
~ ~
~ ~
w ~
t~ ° w
O i.
~.
0
y ~ c«,
~ 'C
t1i n y
CI
an °v 4:
3 `>
"~ •.r
~ Cd
A d ~~
N N
00 M
N .--i
~ N
~ M
.-i ~
br9 ~
N
N y~
,~ r
et ~
O '~,
M v
~ ~ C
h
L L
y ,~ oA
0
~ ~ o
,~ °" s~
a ~
h ~
u ~
i ~
~ ~
O ~ 0
~ d °~
~ i
3~
b
U
.~
'~
r-.
W
0
a~
ea
aai
A
0
w
.~
w
w ^ cn
~ M
~ o .~
~ ~ ~
~n ^
... a>
U .U+
Cr' y
'~
~ ~ ~
~~
~ '""'
~~
M N A
w
~x
~~ a
N ~ ~
~~ a
a ~' x
~a a~
~ '.~7 ~
w "o ~
ti ~ cn
b ~ O
a U
~~ w
y y
x 3 °'
c7 'Ly
.° o w
~ ~,, a
Q .-~
~ V ~ ~
~ ~ ~
v'i ,~ y
M o U
~ ~ ~
b ~ •~ .~
~ °~,.~A
ooo. ~ ~
~N~~~
H ~wY
a ~,
~~>_~>
a~i b ~ ? ~
>'>~~•~
.~~~~~
~' • ~ o
fn m ~.
~ ~ v ~ `'-~
,,~~ ~ ~ ~ N
~ ~ .r .-. N
U U
ww~.~~
~--~ N M 7 69
~st~a'-
- city of eagan
MEMO
TO: Tom Hedges, City Administrator
FROM: Gene VanOverbeke, Director of Administrative Services
Maria Karels, City Clerk/AdministraNve Services Coordinator
DATE: April 5, 2002
SUBJECT: Establish Precinct Boundaries/Legislative Redistricting
In response to the redistricting that has occurred at the state level, it is necessary to change
certain existing precinct boundaries in the City of Eagan. The congressional redistricting did not
affect Eagan in that the City is still encompassed within one congressional district. However,
Eagan was previously in the 6~' district but is now part of the 2"d congressional district. The state
legislative boundaries place Eagan in three legislative districts, 38A, 38B and 39A and two
senate districts, 38 and 39. Formerly, the City was in legislative districts 38A and 38B and
senate district 38. The new legislative boundaries resulted in a split of City precincts 1 and 10.
In reviewing new precinct boundary options, based on past experience staff has placed a very high
priority on minimizing the amount of disruption to precinct boundaries and polling locations. The
goal has been to recognize the impact on the primary election stakeholders, the voters and the
election judges. The Minnesota Redistricting Guide, published by the Secretary of State's office for
use by election officials during the redistricting process, states that, unlike elective districts, voting
precincts are based on administrative convenience and may be lazge or small in population. The
approach of maintaining existing precinct boundaries and polling locations to the extent possible
leads to less confusion for voters and election judges on election day and a more efficient election
and positive experience. Although notification is sent to each affected household, when a change in
precincts or polling locations occurs, a significant amount of resulting confusion is inevitable. This
in turns leads to additional problems for election judges who need to direct voters to new locations
on election day and frustration for voters who may have waited in line only to be told they are in the
wrong location. Unfortunately, it may also result in voters being allowed to vote in the wrong
precinct.
Attached is a proposed precinct map developed by staff limiting the amount of changes to
existing precincts by adjusting the boundaries of precincts 1, 2, 6 and 10 only to accommodate
the new legislative boundaries as necessary. In this scenario the polling location for precinct 2
would need to be changed since the Quarry Park Shelter will not adequately accommodate the
increased number of voters. Staff is continuing to explore possibilities for a new polling location
at this time. Fire Station No. 2 is being considered as the polling location for precinct 1, with
Pilot Knob Elementary becoming the polling location for precinct 2.
33
Another required change is the polling location for precinct 12. The current polling location is
Cedar Ridge Christian Church; however, church officials have indicated that a change in
ownership and operating philosophy will likely prevent them fram serving as a polling location
for the upcoming election. Therefore, staff is proposing to change the polling location of
precinct 12 to Living Word Lutheran Church, which has previously served as a polling location
for precinct 6. Deerwood Elementary would become the new polling location for precinct 6.
While it is not necessary to ensure that all precincts aze equal in size, it is important to keep in mind
the population of a given precinct in relation to the polling facility in order to adequately
accommodate the given number of voters. While there can be problems at certain times of the day,
the majority of the existing polling locations are meeting the needs of the voters and election judges
in a satisfactory manner.
By way of additional information, typically public facilities and churches aze chosen as polling
locations for the following reasons:
• No or relatively low facility rentaUuse fees
• Keys are provided to election staff to open and close the polls
• Continuity and stability
• Limited conflicting uses on election day
• Reasonable amounts of parking
This plan accommodates the new legislative boundaries, as required; however, limited disruption is
proposed to precincts 1, 2, 6, and 10.
Councihnember Bakken has volunteered his time to assist with the redistricting process and has
submitted several different options for consideration by the Council. He has divided the City into
four quadrants: the northwest, northeast, southwest and southeast. One precinct option was
submitted for the northwest option, four precinct options for the northeast quadrant, three precinct
options for the southwest quadrant and four precinct options for the southeast quadrant, resulting in
48 possible different scenarios, if all possible combinations were to be considered. Amore
straightforward approach to reach a conclusion rather than considering all possible combinations
would be to choose the desired option for each quadrant independently from the other quadrants
and then simply put them back together for a total plan. Option one for each of the quadrants
contains minimal changes to existing precincts. The other options range from minor to significant
changes. The various options aze designed to incorporate additional objectives that will be
explained by Councilmember Bakken on Tuesday. Precincts 15 and 18 remain unchanged in any of
the proposed options and aze not included on any of the quadrant maps. The various maps
submitted by Councilmember Bakken contain the over 17 (voting age) population for each of the
precincts, which is important to consider with regazd to polling place capacity. In Councilmember
Bakken's system, options from each of the four quadrants can be combined without any overlap of
precincts. These maps are also attached.
Changes to precinct boundaries need to be completed by the City by April 30, 2002. Therefore,
action must be taken by the Council at the April 16, 2002 City Council meeting or at a special
meeting to be scheduled. It is not necessary to designate all the polling locations at the time of
redistricting/re-establishment; however, it is desirable.
3~-
ttem: ~! - ~~ a-rt,o ilu- r'0 1. u
9,
- Attachment # /- Dvcrv~cw Me-n
~, ~~
-city of eagan .
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AN'D CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: CITY ADMINISTRATOR HEDGES
DATE: JUNE 13, 2000
. SUBJECT: SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING/JUNE 20, 2000
A Special City CouncO meeting vas scheduled by the City. CouncO for Tuesday, June 20, at 5:00 p.m The
meeting v-~11 adjourn at approximately 6:10 pm. and a light hutch w01 be served in the employee hutchroom
CASCADE BAY POLICIESIUSE OF STROLLERS AN'D TELEPHONES
At the regular City Counct~ meeting held on Monday, June S, Mr. Stuart Forseth, 475 West Pt~ot Knob Road,
appeared at the City Counct~ meeting and expressed his opposition to a policy restricting strollers from
Cascade Ba}~. Since Mr. Forseth appeared under Visitors to be Heard and time was limited for any fiather
consideration of this policy matter, the policy restricting strollers from Cascade Bay was deferred to the June
20 Special City Counet~ meeting for further discussion
V~firn Cascade Bay vvas under construction, research was conducted on policies and procedures at similar
£act~ities. The majority of the water parks' research does not allow strollers due to safety reasons. There
have been cases where life guards have had to rescue infants in unattended strollers in the zero depth entry
area of facilities. Research has also indicated that even if the infants in strollers did not have to be `4~escued",
they were most often left unattended while guardians utt~ized the factlity with other children or aduhs, or the
strollers were left empty and unattended. The research also stated that the number of stroller hkely to be on
site at any one time would make the site and a~3~nirtis<ration tuurtanageable and, therefore, the policy decision
to not allow strollers into Cascade Bay for the safety of all patrons was acknowledged during 1999.
During the initial weeks of the 1999 season, there were a number of requests to bring stmllers into the site.
As the season continued, these requests significantly dropped as guests found other options. Guests are
allowed to bring portable car seats inside the factlity. Strollers, hke bicycles, can be kept outside the gate and
ticked up. Many guests utilized both of these options. D~8 the 1999 season, 670 infants under the age of
l 8 months visited the factlrty. The majority of guests with cht~drrn in strollers wbo have visited CaSCade Bay
are understanding of the reasoning behind this policy.
Hastings Fam~y Aquatic Center also does not allow strollers into its ~et~ity for safety reasons. Darbie
Johnson, Aquatics Director, said they also did research prior to opening at 1999 and developed the `~to
stroller policy" for the safety of all of their guests. Hastings is also a zero depth entry factlity.
i
Staff has again discussed the policy restricting stroIlers from entry utto Cascade Bay and continue to have
concerns about the space strollers wt11 occupy witltat the factlity, given the number of potential users. Staff
- believes that guests are able to enjoy the factlrty with the cumeni policy and the fact~ity is safier for all of its
guests due to the policy.
.,.~ .
3S
~ A question has also been raised about the policy regarding tie of tel hones for "
~ Cascade Bay. There arc pay phones both iiuide the fac~ity and outside the facility four ugsc by t cap blic.
Phones ai Cascade Bay are used for emergency purposes only. A question has bcen raised by a user of the
facdity to address the pobcy relative to telephone usage.
Residents who have raised questions about the stroller policy aad telephone policy w~l more thaw l~lcely be at
the Special City Council meeting.
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To provide staff direction relative to Cascade Bay policies regarding use of stroDers and telephones.
CO'N'SIDER APPOL'~'TME>\"T OF ZONL'~'G ORDL'~1A.~'CE UPDATE COMMITTEE
The Advisory Planning ComQnission is Bugg mg that a Zo ' Orda~ance Update Coam~ittee be appoamted
by the City Counctl Attached on pages ~ through is a copy of a memo from Senior Plarmer
Ridley pro~~iding information about the purpose of the Zoning Qrdinarlce Update Committee and a general
timeline for their work
ACTION TO BE CONSIDERED:
To pro~~de direction regarding the appointment of a Zoning Ordinance Update Committce as requested by
the Advisory• Plantmzg Coaunission
DISCt'SSION RE: Fi'TLTRE STEPS FOR THE CENTRAL PARK AND COMMUl1'ITY CEI\'TER
DE«LOPI7ENT
There are a number of next steps involved in proceeding ahead with the Central Park and Community Center
development in light of the bond referendum that was passed on June 6. The followwinmg is a brief outline of
the neat steps that v~~ill occur as the commiuiity proceeds ahead with this project.
RFP Process/Architect aad Construction Manager - Otye of the $rst actions to be considered is
authorization to staff to proceed with an RFP process to select both an ,architect aad construction manager.
It v-~U be necessary to prepare an RFP, solicit requests for proposals aad then the City Council will select both
the architect and construction mazsager following final iaterviex~s.
Park Planner - It is also suggested that the City give consideration to a park planner who can review the
entire 60 acre site and provide input and direction for use by the architect, construction manager, focus
groups, sta8'and community as the City proceeds ahead wish the projecK.
Other Considerations - At a future date, it w~l be necessary to rezone and re plat the property. There
~ will be engineering studies, ooordiaation of the antral parkway; construction that was dancted by a petition,
a request for feasib~ity report for Duke Weeks, meetings with adjacent corporations to discuss partncrstups
and, finally, appoirmtrner>t of focus gmups/design teams made up of Eagan residents sad technical staff to
review both external and internal facets of the Community Center and Central Park elements.
~ 3~
i-- __ ~--- ______ _ _--
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page ^ PAGE ^ 1 ^
MINUTES OF A
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EAGAN CITY COUNCIL
EAGAN, MINNESOTA
JUNE 20, 2000
A special meeting of the Eagan City Council was held on Tuesday, June 20, 2000
at 5:00 p.m. at the Municipal Center Building. Present were Mayor Awada and
Councilmembers Bakken, Blomquist, Carlson and Masin. Also present were Senior
Planner Ridley, Director of Pazks and Recreation Vraa, and City Administrator Hedges.
AGENDA
Councilmember Carlson moved, Councilmember Bakken seconded a motion to
approve the agenda as presented. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
VISITORS TO BE HEARD
Mayor Awada asked if there were any visitors to be heard; Marvin Rodich 1345
Deerwood Drive asked the Council to exempt land owners of one or more acres to be
exempt from the vehicle and shed storage ordinance being considered. The City Council
agreed to consider the request and Mayor Awada thanked Mr. Rodich for coming to the
meeting.
CASCADE BAY POLICIES, i.e. USE OF STROLLERS, TELEPHONES &
HOURS
City Administrator Hedges provided an overview of this item.
The Councilmembers agreed to address each issue individually. Mayor Awada
introduced Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa to address the current policy and why
the City decided not to allow strollers into Cascade Bay. Vraa noted that safety and the
potential for many strollers in Cascade Bay were two issues that the City's used to base
their decision. Vraa also informed the Councilmembers that the City researched other
city polices with similaz aquatic facilities and found that many cities advised Eagan to
ban strollers from Cascade Bay. The reasons provided by those cities were that the
strollers became obstacles and affected safety. Other cities, which allowed strollers, tried
to use corrals inside the facility; however, patrons often did not use the corrals because
they wanted the stroller neaz them. Thus, the City decided not to allow strollers into the
facility. Vraa, however, noted that the City does allow car seats and other child carriers
into the facility.
31
Special City Council Meeting Minutes
June 20, 2000
Page ^ PAGE ^ 2 ^
Councilmember Masin asked Vraa if the City allowed strollers in the former
wadding pool. Vraa informed Councilmember Masin that the wadding pool policy did
not allow strollers into the facility. Mayor Awada informed Vraa that it is the City's job
to serve the public and questioned whether the City was doing this with its current stroller
policy.
Councilmember Masin stated that the current City stroller policy of not allowing
strollers, but allowing car seats into Cascade Bay seems to be the happy medium.
Councilmember Bakken agreed with Councilmember Masin and restated the concerns of
safety and the amount of time pool staff would have to dedicate to runaway strollers.
Councilmember Carlson stated that Cascade Bay is different and today convenience is
important to the public using the facility.
Councilmember Blomquist asked how many complaints have the City received
last year and whether or not the complaints have increased since the implementation of
the current policy. Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa stated that the City did receive
a few complaints last year regarding the policy, but once people understood the policy the
complaints decreased. Mayor Awada restated her view that the City should be serving
the public in a convenient manner. Thus, the city should consider allowing strollers into
Cascade Bay. Councilmember Bakken, however, stated that allowing strollers may be
convenient, but again safety and staff time attributed to strollers outweigh the
convenience.
Councilmember Masin moved, Councilmember Bakken second the motion to
defer this issue to the Parks Commission for further discussion.
A vote was taken on the motion. Aye: 5 Nay: 0
Aquatic Facility Manager Kristi Organ provided an overview of the current
telephone policy.
Councilmember Blomquist asked if the public could call into the Cascade Bay.
Organ stated that Cascade Bay does not have a published public line. Councilmember
Carlson stated that due to the volume of calls a published public line would not be
affective. Mayor Awada asked all Councilmembers if the current policy was sufficient.
The Councilmembers all agreed that the current policy was fine.
Mayor Awada addressed the hours of operation for Cascade Bay and sighted that
the facility has been closed too often this season. Director of Parks and Recreation Vraa
stated that due to the weather the facility has closed early or did not open on certain days.
Mayor Awada stated that the season pass holders expect us to be open and unless there is
extremely severe weather or mechanical problems the facility should be open.
Councilmember Masin suggested that Cascade Bay have some parameters for closure due
3$
Advisory Parks Commission
Minutes of July ] 7, 2000 Regular Meeting
Page 3
NEW BUSINESS
ACQUISITION OF BERGIN PROPERTY
Director Vraa presented a brief introduction that included an exhibit showing location of the
Bergin property and the topography and potential acquisition boundaries. Vraa explained that a minimum
of/z acre of the property was identified for potential acquisition. Vraa also indicated that Bergin intends to
sell his home and invesitgate development options but now would entertain an offer from the City of
Eagan. Vraa delineated that commission action could be to either identify portions of the land to acquire
and recommend the purchase to City Council, or not pursue the acquisition.
Chairman Rudolph agreed with the parks vision, and expressed interest in obtaining a parcel of
Bergin land. Dorothy Peterson inquired if the purchase of 2 acres would be within the high water mark,
and Vraa said it would in fact be within the high water mark, plus allow for the trail loop connection. Vraa
said that the trail could be connected with a l-acre purchase, but a 2-acre purchase would allow greater
flexibility.
Joseph Bari made a motion to purchase a minimum of one-half acre and maximum of two acres of
Bergin property, not to exceed a cost of $58,500, seconded by Cindee Fields. Terry Davis questioned why
there was a minimum of one-half acre under consideration, and Joesph Bari said it was due to the amount
Mr. Bergin would sell. All members voted in favor
SPONSORSHIP POLICY
This issue has been deferred to August, as noted on the agenda.
REVIEW OF STROLLER POLICY- CASCADE BAY
By request from the City Council after their special session, Director Vraa has asked the Advisory
Commission to review the policy prohibiting strollers into the Cascade Bay facility. The issue before the
Advisory Commission is to consider the best alternative for customer service; to compromise on the stroller
issue, change the policy and let strollers in, or to let the policy stand as is.
Chairman Rudolph stated he has read the policy, and stated it was cleazly a safety issue, and
follows models of existing facilities. The policy was based on models from other cities, and suggested that
the policy stand for now, and possibly have staff revisit it in a yeaz or two. Rudolph did not sense that it
was feasible to change the policy.
Dorothy Peterson mentioned that strollers were the most debated issue at Cascade Bay, and that
customer service is important. Vraa said there weren't many people trying to bring them in, and the policy
is clearly stated, distributed with the season pass. Tent' Davis mentioned most people don't have a
problem with the policy, in fact few people ever bring it up. Davis is hesitant to spend a great deal of time
on the issue, and suggests a workshop might be in order to address this and other issues that have been
tabled.
Cyndee Fields observed, from her experience as a patron of Cascade Bay, that there is no room for
strollers and become a safety issue. She suggested that strollers around the water azeas could easily be
knocked in the water by running children. Davis stated that safety is an element of customer service.
Joseph Bari made the motion to keep the existing "no strollers" policy in place, Dorothy Peterson
seconded, and all members affuTned.
39
As you prepare to visit CusCnd¢ ~,
please keep the following guidelines in mind:
• No food is allowed to be brought into Cascade Bay. There will be n large
assortment of food that can be purchased at the Captains Galley. There will
also be picnic tables available outside the entrance for guests' use.
• Appropriate swim attire must be worn in the park. T-shirts worn for sun
protection will be the only non-swim attire allowed in the water. Because the
chlorine in the water may cause some shirt dyes to bleed, white or light
colors are recommended.
• Lifejackets approved by the United States Coast Guard will be the only
floatation device that can be used in the leisure pool and Ivry river.
Lifejackets will not be allowed on any of the water slides.. ,
• Water toys, sand toys, noodles, water wings and balls are not allowed to be
brought into Cascade Bay. Sand toys will be provided in Sandpiper Beach.
• 6uests must be 42" tall to ride the water slides or float alone in the fury
river. Children may ride in the lary river tube with an adult.
~- • Infants can be carried into Cascade Bay in n car seat. Strollers will not be
allowed.
• 6uests who are not toilet-trained will be asked to be in 'Little Swimmers" or
plastic pants (No disposnble/cloth diapers underneath). 'Little Swimmers"
will be sold at Cascade Bay for those who wish to purchase them.
• The Cnscnde Bny Crew appreciates parents providing the level of supervision
for their children that they would ensure at any other park or event.
• Personnel at Caxnde Bay will not be able to hold guests' personal belongings.
• All persons entering the facility, including spectators, will be required to pay
the daily fee.
• Cascade Bny is o tobacco free focility.
• If Cascade Bny has reached capacity, season pass holders will have priority
entry over daily admissions as space becomes available.
• For up to date information and hours for Cascade Bay, please call our hotline
nt 651-681-4777 or visit www.cnscadebay.com.
These policies have been set to ensure the safety and enjoyment
for all of our guests at Cascade Bny.
If you have any questions, please toll 651-681-4660.
Cascade ~~jja~
1360 Civic Center Drive
Eagan, Minnesota
South of the MunicipolCenter of Wescott Rood
~
j_J~.>~.. . ~ ~
t - I
_ - ,
~ _.. .
.-
_ __ ._ Y
ICI . ~
._ _
"'= 3
~~
~
~ ~ ~
~ _
~ ~ - 14
v _ _ ~ ... 1S
_. '~
~ ~S ~„ 16
i
~t
:
- -
~ . ~
- r_ --- ~~ s
~ ~y`+S
;+ - ~
~
~
-~J~ Grp ~
S a ss
C
s u
II r - *' ~
`
,~
i
s~ _
~
z.
yz
; Lr
?
A
.:a
9 ,. _ ~ ~
.r 15.
_. ~ ~,.
;.. ,>.
19 ~ /
.. I s'R~
p L
`~ ,
' . ~
'~ n ,~
d
~. ~ I
a..~
.; - +b...r
~~ I
3i
_.~ .. _
3000 0 3000 8600 Feet
identified Sites
Identified Potential Site
Eagan Boundary N
Water
Street Centerline
Map prepared by city a Ea9en Community Developmart oepartrnent ~~s~mde~co~pe,+zooo~oomvde~ooo s.av.
City of Eagan, MN 04-Apr-02
Identified Potential Soccer Field Sites
County Assessed Value
Map Property Owner Name/ land Use Plan
ID Owner Address Land Value Bldg Value Acres Zoning Designation
1 FERN PEDERSON $15,000 $0 5.2 1-1 SA
6616 UNION LAKE TRL
LONSDALE MN 55046.4324
2 FERN PEDERSON $15,800 $0 5.1 I-1 SA
6616 UNION LAKE TRL
LONSDALE MN 55046324
3 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM $86,900 $0 26.1 I-1 SA
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 551 01-1 67 2
4 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV SERV $308,600 $25,691,400 15.5 I-1 IND
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 5 51 01-1 634
5 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO $348,400 $1,152,400 6.2 I-1 IND
PROPERTY TAX DEPT
414 NICOLLET MALL
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401-1993
5 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV SERV $495,400 $1,600,000 32.9 I-1 IND
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1634
7 BCBSM INC $2,333,500 $250,000 9.0 PD OiS
3535 BLUE CROSS RD
P 0 BOX 645609
SAINT PAUL MN 551 22-1 1 54
8 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM $315,100 $148,500 14.9 I-1 IND
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1672
9 CITI-CARGO 8 STORAGE CO INC $720,800 $0 12.7 I-1 IND
3775 HWY 13
EAGAN MN 55122.1034
10 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM $115,000 $0 3.4 I-1 IND
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1672
11 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL $365,000 $0 11.9 I-1 IND
ADMINISTRATIVE 8 FINANCIAL SERVICES
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1634
12 PATRICK MCCARTHY $1,229,300 $0 34.5 A LD
1275 DEERWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55123.1425
13 WEST PUBLISHING CO $2,481,600 $0 82.7 PD IND
% GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN pR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
14 GOPHER SMELTING 8~REFINING CO $598,600 $0 21.1 PD IND
3365 HWY 149
EAGAN MN 55121-2395
15 WEST PUBLISHING CO $1,078,800 $0 36.0 PD IND
%GORDON J MARSHIKTAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
Page 1 of 2
~a
County Assessed Value
Map Property Owner Name/ Land Use Plan
ID Owner Address Land Value Bldg Value Acres Zoning Designation
16 WEST PUBLISHING CO $589,700 $0 11.8 1-1 IND
% GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
17 YMCA OF GREATER ST PAUL $916,900 $3,583,100 21.1 I-1 IND
476 ROBERT ST N
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-2278
18 WEST PUBLISHING CO $274,400 $0 6.6 I-1 IND
% GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
19 EDWARD G III ATSINGER $140,500 $186,200 2.8 LB O!S
4880 SANTA ROSA RD STE 300
CAMARILLD CA 93012-0958
20 EDWARD G III ATSINGER $828,900 $0 16.5 LB 0/S
4880 SANTA ROSA RD STE 300
CAMARILLO CA 93012-0958
21 WEIERKE TRENCHING& EXCAV CO $50,000 $76,300 2.4 A LD
660 CLIFF RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2008
22 WEIERKE TRENCHING& EXCAV $49,000 $0 1.9 A LO
660 CLIFF RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2008
23 ROGER F WEIERKE $62,700 $111,700 2.0 A LD
630 CLIFF RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2008
24 DAVID T FORSMAN $97,500 $169,600 3.6 A LD
4640 DODD RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2109
25 DALE F 8 DOROTHY A TESSMER $112,500 $134,600 4.6 A LD
4650 DODD RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2109
26 NWA INC $1,169,500 $0 21.5 A SA
DEPT A4450
5101 NORTHWEST DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55111-3034
27 DAKOTA COMMUNITIES INC $101,100 $0 3.1 A SA
680 ONEILL DR
EAGAN MN 55121-1535
28 CCPRE EAGAN $4,325,800 $19,974,200 83.4 PD SA
%WAM!NET INC ATTN: CONTROLLER
655 LONE OAK DR
EAGAN MN 55121-1560
Page 2 of 2
43
MEMO
city of eagan
TO: Gene ~'anOverbeke, Director of Administrative Services
CC: Beth A. ~`'ielde, Parks Research 8: Special Projects
Paul Olson, Parks Superintendent
FROM: Ken Vraa, Director of Parks and Recreation
DATE: February ]3, 2002.
SUBJECT: 2002-2007 Park Site Fund CIP
The Advisory Parks Commission approved the following 2002-2007 Capital Improvements Plan at
their regular meeting on February 11, 2002.
Fund Balance: $3,03 8,000
2002
,,,
Soccer Field Li htin ,
$0
Moonshine Park Develo ment $250,000
North Park Miti ation from 2001- See North Park Total $0
North Park Infrastructure see North Park Total $0
Holz Farm Master Plan $30,000
Pla ound Re lacement, Slaters Acres and Lexin ton $60,000
Central Park Gazebo er Council action $50,000
Skate Park Relocation and Ex ansion $75,000
Ber in Ac uisition $58,000
Lan straat Ac uisition $58,000
Holz Farm Roof $30,000
North Park Total $575,000
2002 Total $1,186,000
2003
~,
Carnelian Park Rink Li ht U grade ,
$25,000
Clearii~ater Park Rink Li ht L' grade $30,000
Ca tain Dodd Park Sun Shelter 535,000
RidJecliff Pai',: Sun Shelter $35,000
Pla ound Re lacements, Probable Fish Lake and O'Lea $60,000
J
Holz Farm Develo ment _ __ ___
$250,000
Thomas Lake Park Structural Re airs $175,000
Patrick Ea an Park Master Plan $80,000
Central Park Exterior Pla ound $40,000
Hocke Rink Pavin $40,000
Tennis Court Reconstruction 2 $45,000
Total $815,000
2004
~
-
I~'orthview Park Tennis Court Lights ,
$75,000
Pla round Re lacement, Probable Cedar Pond and South oaks $60,000
Central Park Im rovements $210,000
Patrick Ea an Park Master Plan $0
Patrick Eagan Park Master Plan Im lementation $500,000
Hocke Rink Pavin Z $80,000
Teruiis Court Reconstruction (2) $45,000
Total $970 000
2005
~
,
As halt Hocke Rink ,
$0
«'alnut Hill Park Trail $80,000
Carlson Lake Park Fishin Dock $0 2007
Pla ound Re lacement, Probable Walnut Hill and Rid ecliff $60,000
Rahn Park South Master Plan $0
Hocke Rink Pavin $40,000
Tennis Court Reconstruction (2) $45,000
Total $225,000
~s
2006
Cedar Grove
$150,000
PlavQroiind Re lacement, Probable Goat Hill $30,000
Hocke} Rink Paving $40,000
I Total I $220,000 I
2007
Hocke Rink Pavin $40,000
Rahn Park Master Plan $25,000
Carlson Lake Fishin Dock $25,000
Lexin ton-Diffle , endin match from EAA and adult lea ues $200,000
Total $290,000
"Parking Lot"
OLDA', '~ •-
Under Stud ~~
$
Bike Park Under Stud $
Refri erated Hocke Rinks Pendin EHA Pro oral $100,000
S ra Pool ? $
Golf Course Pendin Horton Dev. Pro osal $
S orts Dome ? $
Additional Skate Park Revisit- Fa112002 $75,000
Additional Rink, E Side Lex Ave ? $175,000
Bridle Ridge Park Buildin Ex . ? $175,000
Tra Farm Tubin Hill Ex ? $200,000
Burr Oaks Trail ? $35,000
v~
Total- All Projects, 2002-2007
2002 ,.
$1,186,000
2003 $ 815,000
2004 $ 970,000
2005 $ 22~,Ou~
2006 $ 220,000
2007 $ 290,000
Total, 2002-2007 $3,706,000
Other Allocations
Ac uisition ortunities $460,000
Small Pro'ects $100,000
Total $560,000
2002-2007
47
Balance Over Time
II
Be~imlin~ Balance ~
$3,038,000
Park Dedication $ 300,000
Earnings 4% of be innin balance) $ 121,000
Total Available $3,459,000
I
2002 Ex enditure $1,186,000
End Balance $2,273,000
II
Be innin Balance
$2,273 000
Park Dedication $ 250,000
Earnin s (4% of be innin balance) $ 90,000
Total Available $2,613,000
2003 Ex enditure $ 815,000
End Balance $1,798,000
III
BeQinnin Balance
$1,798,000
Park Dedication $ 200,000
Earnings (4°~0 of besinnin balance) $ 71,000
Total Available $2,069,000
2004 Ex enditure $ 970,000
End Balance $1,099,000
II
Be inning Balance
$1,099,000
Park Dedication $ 100,000
Earnin s (4% of be innin balance) $ 44,000
Total Available $1,243,000
2005 Ex enditure $ 225,000
End Balance $1,018,000
III
~~
Be innin Balance $1,018,000
Park Dedication $ 100,000
EarninQc f4% of beoinnin balance $ 40,000
Total Available $1,158,000
2006 Ex enditure $ 220,000
End Balance $ 938,000
II
Be iiuun Balance
$
938 000
Park Dedication $ 100,000
Eamin s 4% of be innin balance) $ 37,000
Total Available $1,075,000
2007 Ex enditure $ 290,000
End Balance $ 785,000
49
,-
v= ~~
r~
,.
- 9 ' o.
" - ~ , ~~ il~% ~~
~~~" ~ ~ f 1 ~~, ~ 1
,6~ ` , ~ ~ ~- i'i ~ . ~ `~ 1 ~ ~ o ~ 'I
i~ i ~"~.` ~ ~d ~' ~ _ ~ ~ Cam, ~ ~,
0 3000 Feet / ~ ~`r ~~ L~ ~- e ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~'~
.`f ~"~ .gyp, 2 ~~`" e \
,~ , ~ ~ ~ ~= 5512'i ~' J ~ ~ ~ ,
~; ,~°' ` ~ ~ ~ -off . ~ e~E" _ __' ~, r F ,,, , ~`
a ~ i!i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~
2 ~ , ~ o~
/~ >r L ~ ~ 1 14.7 } ~ 1 ~ _ ~~ ~ C -- ~
~' p o i
~. ~ 7 ~~ ~ -~,~~ ~
_~ ~.. 6~ I ,o,
~. g
_ ~ ~' 7 ~ ..
~,
_~
r.
.- 8 -
,~,.~,
~' a ~ ~~ :• ,~~, ~ -, i ~ ~
~ - i ~
'1f ~ _ 6 101,E ~ ~ ~,~ -'~
_ __ ,~~ ~ ~ I~J~ o ,~~ii _
l~~' , ~ i ~ II :~'~-~ ~:~~ 1" ~~ 9O Ca6~~i r r ~~
- 14 1 - ~ ~ t i o
6
~~t2~ - ~ ~ I ~ C ~ ~~ ~ r ~~
3
.... -.
I
`.~ I i 12 ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~Ja~ 21 };
~l ~ _~ ~ - '~4~ - _~ 15 E ~ _ . ,~ ~~~ .~
~~~ ., ~~
I 13 ,~, ~.. ~~~ ` ~~ 17
,~
~~ ~ ~ ->
~~
~ ~ ....
v ,
~- r~
i - ~ ~~~
~ J
1
QQ _ ,1 ~~~ 2 011 ~ ~~
. - ~; P
~" ; ~ ~ -
i~~--
o ~ I~:°~
~_ _
e+ o -~. s" r ~ i~ i
City of Eagan, MN
Precinct Plan No.2
Proposed Precinct Boundary
New Legislative Boundary
(10 Proposed Polling Location
~.; Proposed Precinct
Boundary Elimination
~ Park
~ Water
Precinct 1 -Fire Station No. 2 • Prednd 12 -Living Word Lutheran Church '
Precinct 2 -Pilot Knob Elementary' Precnct 13 -Rahn Elementary School
Precinct 3 -Trinity Lutheran Church Precinct 14 -Christ Lutheran Church
Precinct 4 -Cedar Elementary School Precnct 15 -Thomas Lake Elementary
Proposed
POlling Precinct 5 - Mt. Calvary Lutheran Church Precinct 16 -Easter Lutheran Church
Locations precinct 6 - Deerwood Elementary ' Prednd 17 - St. Thomas Becket Church
Prednd 7 -Fire Administration Bldg. Prednd 18 -Fire Station No. 5
Precinct 8 -Eagan Municipal Center Precinct 19 -Chapel Hill Baptist Church
Prednd 9 -Woodland Elementary School Precinct 20 -Red Pine Elementary School
Prednd 70 - St. John Neumann Church Precinct 21 -Pinewood Elementary School
Prednd 11 - Northview Elementary School •indicafes a polling rocadon change
City of Eagan, MN
Precinct Redistricting
Population Breakdown -Test
Pop. Deviation
Precinct Total Population from 3027
Plan 2
Total Pop.Age
17 Plus
UnAssigned 0 -3027 0
1 1254 -1773 921
2 3436 409 2661
3 2930 -97 2257
4 2413 -614 1955
5 2965 -62 2421
6 4348 1321 3355
7 4048 1021 2813
8 3082 55 2460
9 4767 1740 3229
10 1746 -1281 1211
11 5181 2154 3206
12 3037 10 2258
13 1860 -1167 1429
14 3535 508 2607
15 2544 -483 1934
16 2837 -190 2017
17 2761 -266 1615
18 2283 -744 1559
19 2368 -659 1601
20 3269 242 2060
21 2893 -134 1817
~\,€ m~=
\~ _'•
I~ ~ ;,J~
'~ ~ o ~ ~ g ~
~ -
/~
/~ ~~/ _~', ~ ~ ~,~'~ I ; e I
/~ ~~~ ~/~~//r°j/"`/,;# K \\~"~~`\ ~ ~`~~~e~, 4~ V ~ ```ya I -\ \ OO2'~'L ! ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I
' .,
lu
~~c ~ L"~~ e'~ 1~ ~,. ~ 3 ~L,a`~ ~~, ~ ` ~' `~j= SL ~;~` ~~'s I~~ rF f ~ ~s\~`\ I ~^' I
~ ~ 1 ~ ~,a
~~~ - \"'~k{ c 11 ~~~J~ ~~~ ~~~~~\~ ~~;~ '~..f t ``~~°. - .. S
klJ d •. ~. ~.°b
~~ \~~_ g E ~~~J~ ~-Q III J4~~;~~. c\ ~ °~ ~ ~ ~ -
~ ~°x U `~ ~ Cl ~ ~ a
'~~`e a~~ / ,§rr /~\I1~v~~Jd ~3~I ~k/~~ ~ 1/ 7;j ~wt~i~~~ ~''M ~~ ~•r ~7 z m
4. ~---~ I~I~\f~ (~~ c ~~ ~~, \~I7~::° /~,F~i~..,~~-_ • ~/ ~~.,%='~,a ~ ~ aft I,.~ ,dP'" 8 '° ( - _ ~~ `"~*•,,.,,,.~~ I' D
~----Jim. ,m)1 (r/~. I~~~L I`-~..~ .. _ ~q ~~ -r---, 's ~ " ~~ p0 ~ ~a I'~~'g =s ~~ I
sue, ,~i 1-~ `~~~ I I ~y, C aSa ~ ~ ~. ~ '~c a ~ --'~s.. s ~~, I
i. ua .~ SI ~L .~.~,`~'~.31\`~'",~la Ml~l~ -"`~A~S~~'~I(~\ .-„x\~~ -1~ _ a. ~i :~.~ a~~ ~ Ilg I~.,I~FIIs E_~.~ I. ~~ I ,
.f:g
fF - ~ i ~ r~- \In~ ~ ;\ C~i~c`~~~1; ~ ^r~' \;~\ ~ ~~ ~~JI~ \ „' LUI~ /~ 1-~~a \~~~I ~!3 ICS ~ O
,,
IJ , I~ ~~ \3 ~_~ i,' ! I i irS~ ~---~I£ 8 // ~~~~. ~~.\ ~I~" ~~ ~ ti 7 I' ~`~I¢ slg I^ \~ r!~I "' ~
~_- r ~ Ali ~~~ \~`--_~~~~_1 - ~ ~/~ -
~_^s ice. ~ -! - v`, e ,i\~J~~~la J 1r ~/~ M~~" ~Y j~,~Il~ ~! ~?' ~ ~'~
I,~ -~,, Sy _''!' ~\~:, I~ ~,; ~?~~fl( o~ ~I~ .,d,,,~e ~ ~I~ ~~ZQe III ~ ~'~ I 0
~ _ .a --~ _ y r~ ~
,3 _J~p~• s~-~~ *~~~ ~ ~~i^~~=I ~, ~~~' CILJ~• `<~ ,I~~ \'1 'I= I ~ ~ II~I.,~ I~ ,,,
F ~' ' ^"^ ll -I_ ~~ - ~~ li ~ ~~ I \~:t~;`i _-o-.t' ~? ~I' 11° /~.__ II8 ~i-Ins IY '/~~' ¢~3 I /_ I
~-;l- I _ f~ ~ ~ ~s _ I " ~ ~~6 _ g ~3 ~ I I
1~ I is ~- .`, ~~ ~ ~ ~~`~`~ ~ ~~~e %' ~, ~- I. r~ I i ``, ~~ ~~K,.
+ ~ u L
s ~ ~ ,€
S1~ I ~~~~~~ ~# \ ~ t/, b\~~~~ 9I / I1f "' ~I ,~ ~_~~ 114 `/ ~ ~I„ Ali. I
f
~~~L_sF~ ~ ~ \~~`.~~~~~ I~ ~ III ~ -e~- ~ ail \~ ~ I
`..~ .rte j„~~ ;\: i ~.~o~~/ i . i
_ ~, _ _ 1. _
~~ -L! ~ '~= \C; G• 1~~~ iti,iFO wove \ _ .,~~~..T~ 1 ~ //// ~s
~._ __.
___
...._C..'-. _._._____._-- _
~ / N t0
b' _,_.. .:_~_.
/ / l'
` ~~ ,[ -F"
'{ H3ANI )
' r ( ~
j' ~ ~~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~~~/ t /f - ~ ,_ y
~ ...a 1 l ' '~ n.,
~_ ~~ ~l[ t Ijj~ z ~.. j ~ ~ z~ ~/=. ~
1 ~~ C~ two' ~:ow; ~ 14 ,r 's ~.;ao ~ - } b~s; ~;. ~ ~s ~,~ -~
1 g ~ r ~ ,,,, „fi` ~.j„nv+t~~ ~ s~~ i
j~1 i } ' t~ ~x-1 :~~ f~ `» t _~ ,,~ is
~ ' ~ ~ - ~~~ ~ ° ~~~ ''~~~~ ° rn . : ~ ~~5~ ` ~ ~'' /~r ~ fir` '~
~ r w>: ~// ti
;t ~, xZ j r
~ ~"' ~" "' ~ ~ rail ~S tic ! tfi ~^y ,~ ;;i
.t"Y~ 1 'r, ~ ~i 1 1 ~ s.
J .~'
[ ~~- ~` / J ~ ... rf ~ ~a
1/ t i r tV }
~ ~<
~~ *i~. ! g~ x ~' l v. ~ ,~ ~ ~ '~ ~ ,
~~ ~ ~~ ya 4 i
_ nom/ y.r~~..~n.~- ~ r„ ~/)~ ~ ~~ 5~ > ~ S t~ ~ y,~ ~,.
_ ~ ~ Y + ~ Y. ~ I ~'~~ f .. 1 r
' ~
,..._ ~ }
• - t w
.. , - ._ .,.. ...... ~ 3
i '. I
/ ~
i ~~ ~
r -~ r., tj ~ ~ 4 ..~~4
`~ >,,, -~ i j ~R,L>"' ~ ~.< bits v~ f r; ~ ~"~L.,,
~` s i c ~1 j a ~~ 3:'~~ ~ i
.~
~ ~ ~ w,.w ~
..
'~i M.~ . nro+^:~~_:j ,.~. Re>. ~ 7 /~ tC ~^t`~ , _ ~ It
w
1~ g ~y ~ 8~ p y, uaiYU:iiln ~( ~'\ ~,, ~ j Y' vn~ "
~ [~
_ ___
`J ~ _
„r,~ e~M_.~ ~.( ,~ \~ ; ~. i~ \~.:"" -d t ~. Ott II~~ L_ ~_.. ~'
i i' '1 Lil~~~ U Yl IMiA1~4 ~,J~ ~~ '
_ ,..~
W ~ ~~ 1 i
~ . 7t ~' ~'
.,i ~ ; w+ ,
____a t. _._ _w_~ ~ l _ ~ ~ ~ ~ '
.. ~ ill _. _. ~
____ ~_ ~.
~ ~ ~ ii l 11 R r ~l - `~' i 1
S
~~ ~+ y R raw, ~~.f ~,.1 '"'~ u~ ti f ~i r•.. 1`~ `a~ aL,` ; / ~~~ `~y~, ~.:> t~ ,.W~ / - `-„~~~~ ~ 1~._. ~ ~a1 ~ ,.~ '.
F v
{I tr~ 8S2
4~ _ t a FY ~[yr r ~.
:. av 11 //
yn.. wY +r` -ak.~ ~t ~i 1 1
:
\ .
7 } I 1 I
z
i
n. / ' r I I ... ..
w.,
: ~ ...~ t ~~` L;
..- ,
e
~,'' ~ ~ ~ -
._ - ...,,
~1 ~ . ~~.~
.a t~ ~ rmx,~ ..r.. ~ ~~~i A ~ ~ r+m,,.arr }1~Y r/' ~r ~I [ .1, #~ }'~ ~ 1 +. .+: ; ~~
~wr
.
•~ 11
~--~---,
~_~. ..
„ ~ 1. , ~ ,S , , F, ,
. , ~ ,~ #
_ ~ r ° ,_.
$ O .I ~' rowu a '- r !
li ' ~ ,
~~ ji ~ ~ ~*~,~ ~'~ t'ij 2~€ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. i ~ ,~ „~.,~ ~
t ='~ L ,a ~ .. ~i~ ~ 'X `~~~,~ r ~` w.s -~3 ~~-~' ... i~..... +.. .y~.:fiWW9pr ~ ;~
r, k
s '
j/// ~ ~.E ? ~~ ~ ~~
_.
'^~.,_J ~`~ r/y1 ~~ y ~I~a_ y ~~~ f C ~: r~ ^ ;} ~Ilj ~.g~:: y ~`~\.::'..°-r~~ Ls'~ ~.,
\._.`.\,f~~ ~ I -~-t~~s~.\lra,~ ~I (~,i`....ir ~!S~ N Gi (. ~s ~3 f l i ..v+kva
' _.
[ ../
i i s ~~"~a.*rtf~~~r ~ ~i~ r+~li t~7 ` ~ ~ f I' 15XA f9. X17 lC)tIGTM M ~ A%1. ..
_ _
} ~c~
;;, ~ ; ,
1( °~~ ..., 1/ n r~~""~"~~ IP ~ ( ~~ ::.- ~ s~~ «a `f '$~ ~ ~~'"' _ ~i_ awa ¢ ~r%1`wxi•
f~ Iw ~.
~ ~ ~ ~4~~ c~.vv~v\':1 J ;gym. ~ ~.•..~« 4 ~ R ~~' s .Sk ~I ~ O
1 i+ S !~ tl .~
.. ~ 1 I ~_„<,~ /~ f F - ~ y ~ f , weN n x+vutk~ l .. t$ ~ ~ ... ~
_~ II'~~ .il"-' ~~ K .-._ '$fi' = 'cam .._'__..... i~ ,n ~.
. ~i ,~ ~:a ~~ ~ ~ x = ~>:- ~.~ j~ ; ~ Vim. ~ ~ H(
q' ~ a .~
,._ r .y~ !;_,~
~.,
.,
~ k w . _
... , ~ i
' z
., i t'<' 1. Htt, fY f t ~ ~F K a 9 Y~ _ ( ~` _ a ~ - ~+ J~)
• - ~ *~ _ ~~ r ~ ~~~ ~ _ J
> N
r
4 ~ lu- Yct Rjp ~ ft ~ S f ~it _ { ` T ~ S~S,, ~ ~,/~' ~i'(~ A
l~ _ L _ ~ 5
i L f (
{ .hs D~~i ~ ~J~" ,Sly f I SLR C~v~ ~~ ~ ;'''~ / fr~~ jr 4rj t ,°
ly ~ ,.1 ~~ ~~ "+.( ;r • . ~~ ~~ }?~ lei ~;~ ~ ~ ,~ ~" ,
J1 fem. ? y ` ~ !~
~,r Y --i,;•- 7 k lib _ ~ +~ -
~ ^ ,...tai s ~/?~ /~'fr.! ~ ~ " ~ ..+'' - "'~ ~ B ~ ~ l~ }~1~ ,r. ~ ~ «.r~~r
.., ~ _ /l° 11 "^+~ ~ + E U ~""'~ i~~ ~ ~ RE'°telX'' F19' IIyr1_i
,_
i' '~ .
;,.
,. ~ ., ~~
,;
~ t L
~ ri ~%~''~r~ INVER GROVE ~1 HEIGHTS ~) /~ ~l
,~`
i<
~' h -'~~l( << ~
~,; ,
W.
..,
~ ~ lrr ~j ' ~ ~~ ~ Via:: _.__ ._ _........ ~:..~__.~..,/ 45
_.
f l:~R ~ r
r . ~~ ~ rl >ti~ rd ~
r r
~ r' ~~
,. ~ i Yt
i ~~- ~<~
~,:~ z. _
.....
1 ~~:
._ _ r
z ~ i
r._, r
.. x ix :
k • ~ ~ t~~ w ~ c, z.~'" ~ sy.- ~~ ..... ~...~ -r~ _ ~ %7r,
;,
:., w ...~ .. ~ t /; ~ ~ ~ ~) )\ .'`1~ .tr ~ ~~ ,v.1 1, C ~R i,„ ~ ;,,
:1 } ~i'
r ~~~~~lfa~~~~I~ ~i~ i ~~/. # ~ I ~~~ ttn' ~~[~ ~ l~tf s*+`« r~f~
I _. ~. .`!!
~~ ~i 'Y~aa ~a~Mj ~ x~L ~/'_.,JJ ~ ..If=w. ..._._. ......__~~ (_... ~ <c'u. W. of cr>:vfcra. ~~.I I:
: 1~
l) ~1~ ~ ~ ~~~'~~~ )~ ~ y"\ ~::._ ~,~ i>_. ..r ~ ~ ~~ 7~~ is __ ._.... _ _ >a~,icY: ~~
~ ~ t~
ff I vrx
t
: ~ {{ ,
,., __ _ wrxc a.xiyua 1. ~ ~ iY
r f' ~ J
~ ~
J t(51 c* 4th`. ~ ~~ ~; l',"l O Y~~ ~~2a~(j ~ ~'' c~i^ ~ii[.ffiS I 7 ~ ~ t ~FMr
lI'
.. ~ ~ ~ , rf (~,,
~.._ ~,~
. - 1
.: .' -r=~ f ltc~ ~~i~ ~ ~ ',e r t ' Cti ~ ~ / ~~ ~r.~ i ,
. ) _ << '' r
~I li_ `~ A `... £ 5
y ` /~ ~ A~~fauu,i , i r a d Fr'. .. ,~"'~ g CSC /~
~ f l , ~ ~'
x
~~"
l ., ~ tii C :
~.~ i ~ ~
_ ^y"";f.~~f 'i'l wmo ~ '~ E~ ~~ ;~~( ,~1 .~ /,f~'' /'~ xvcj= fez.`.
, . ~,r ~`C~~` ~ ` rt;.... ~ f6 ~ ~L~, ~~>%~ ~ ~ _ / ,`''~ r'~^.~ty It ~ # ra
w.. r -_ i~ '~+"~ fa ` !~ ~ Ef 9f x ~
i C ~r
,k }
r ~r ~/)V `•~ ~1 k 3~" l gin.. f ~i a ', y' i ~ (~y ,_~.~. f
F~ \` ~r ~ ~ ff~ 1 } ~~ x~f~~ i fu>~~a~7~~ j r
j r it ~'^~ ~~ .t~ .~ ~-Y'~' J fly' ~r ~ ~ f __ ~ ~v`J
{ WkP f•
,;~ ~ ~, ~# j',r - i f
_ ~ `
=-r-ti w +s ~I ~ ~ ~d- ~1~~ ~ ' + a ~f
\~ y ~" ,.. ~j/ ~ ~~~ ~ ~
~ ~ :f.. (jA ~`%~~ ~ 7NV[R GROVE ,tf HEIGHTS iI f`•
. r ~
---- k
~~ 1~ i
•' ~ _~
a ~t ~ '
,~,. f
~~
i. ~ i k J
~. 4. ~
~.
A ! ~ t ~ ~- ~~ c,K ~# o :~ a a_ ~:.y..w
L ~ /f
~. ~.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E iMf 1~ i i' .,
(~~ ~s~J ~~~~1 ~--~f~ 'w ~ !` r:-.: ~~~'i 1^t...~u ~ ~I._, ~x ~ I~ f '~u`w / T .. ~.. v.rw ~~ ~ ~\
~t.....,,~ __._ ./ ~ -- _ _ .--,~--___ ----~r~_ -. r
__ ~_- ~.
,;
`~_
l ~~l
b - ~~ ,. -~.,r ~z~ i ~~ t,- ~ ~~.~ ~ ~t . _ ,~~ ~ 1. ~~, ~..~
t - u~.
,~~
, r- ~~ , .~ l _ ~..
f 6
_.
fi r
IL
i , s =~ ~~ ~ ,~ ~, ; ~.~ :.fit. ~ ~,~ ~~ ~ ~ <<,. H. ~~"~~ ,
:: .. c~kn~ lr ''<~. a7yy ~t ~!~~ :;~ rn.., ~ rti._ k5c°!z~ :~'~ ;~~ ~ .:
w
" .; ~' /, ):~ ~ ~E 'ta,P„~~',~~-4 .~r ~•''~w!~ S U ~(r (,_ ~''4 I} ~ '•` ~ '' ~\~ /~ rte' G
,, -. ` ~.. 4~ra~R `~ // ~ i r ~~~~C v ,D S .. ~ h "~ ' !" ~'`/~.. w pry .r-
,, S /
I
t ~ ~
~ r y ._ f~" f ,~~ J
g.tyry ~! 4~~ \~,ia C~a ~1 rols+n(~` ( 3;~'td ;} ... ~~if' ^;l~h~ cii7~
i
~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~t, ~r~ _ r ~x ~~ ~ j~~,r ~ Y '~ ,,%v =° I t'~ w'G7, ~~ tJ~~g t
~,, ~~ ~ 1,~ `, - r (1`~ .~:-, ~ ~ 7,
~~ l r ` N @ i S~. ~A. ~ ~~ rya +~
• Y
it "\ v.. !° t t'\`L ~~1'9 Gj i......~ ~^'~/~,il !/L x-`11 ~
` .~~ :...~ 1 .4 1j~s_-. by i r ~r~' t~,r ~ (: V~ L ~.+ca rn~ /I
~i
' ~ F,,,,,, ~.I ~'`'~' ~l ~ 't,.... L
~g `~ 4 J.a.ns~'$. ~ '.. ~ ~ rMa r ~
._ ___
,_ . .• -_~
f
~ t ~~ L~ ~~ ~ iryyEp GROVE ~' HEIGHTS `ff ~ j s
Sig + irif; '~ 1'_.~
` .. _~~ ,
a, -:
7 }~ ,
N
i
l ..
... . Z, _ ,
~„ ~, ~,.
~ ,~ ;4r
_~ €~
1 J ~IIn ~ ~ (~+'~
6I ~:
o,
~'
,_:
_ ; ~4 a.
..-:. ; ;
~,
' r r,~ ~~ Y ~ r ~ - L
k .-_ tl `. ++aof wax '~ ~ ... .. ~ ~ is
.- ~ tl..,ry~Yi•tc~rct~.~)r""`~- ~ ~ ~~~ i.- ~~--...r.. .~~~ ~r .y~,r ~~ .
_ ~
....... 7. ~ t irH f`~ '~e~Lp"~; L:,l ~"~ }2~ ~\ ~ ~ ~iX-J~ ~ n' j~ 1 ~) ~Hf"..I L .:r X
F. \.1 ,~j~t/~ 7 ,~~.._J~"~yry~ ,~.awq~C C i~ )q`'6~~ ~°: 41 ;~ -C
~t :x~ 11 3i i~~T F //~ r~ - ~S„~ Q `~ _ J l S~ti 'rte i
S IF 1 ~~ ~~ u+•ue r~~ ~! t(*^w„ ).ad1 ~'~f~ a ~~75'~~(~"'/'~l' Iii ,' l I
~ _ __
.._...1111 ~, c , k ~ 6 $it ,
l \ @~ ~+g, j~b ~1'~ f w ~~ ~ sI r~,xrf //~ !} 4Sy~`4~°"by- ~ca\ j +{~ f ~R t 4 y ~ 1--
~ _.~~
_. _., _.-
. _, ..
,. r ~ ~
~ ~ t .. , r _~ ~ f
;, _.1
_ ~ ti~ _
~ ~:. :V r~~ ~ ~ { rw ,.. _ _ ~~
.:~ ti ,T
~ t fit: ~ ~y
ry f 1 ~ j~ ~~' 3~ ~yl~r ar ft 1 A
...
w r
r
~ ~ ~
f` a
,t t .~ ~ ~1~4r } ~~ ~ „
~,.
~ '"~~
~~.I \, ,~, ~...~.~ .k ~~ ~; s
~ ~~ ~1 il~~ ~ ~~ x
j
~~~ ~
J `~ a \ ! ~ ~~ N r ~~ ~~~ ' ~ ~ 4
._ ,_.
~.-
G'
1
s
^ ,
_.
~~ G ~ ~~~~
.. - a ~
,, . ,
c 11 ~ c~ ~w,Nt~ y ~ ~ (tt1 ~j~ ~\ ~~ r
,.
a ~ 1 ` r ~ 7~ ~a ~~~~ 7 t+ ~i~ ~ 1 ~ ~^~ f ay k~~'~~ ,~;a.
.. :: \\ ao f• F 'af 1 t 1 Fil ~ ~ ,+'~ , 'rd ~ - E y ~
~ ~ ~ E~ 1 t rl a ~ ~ ~ ? i I ~ ~ ~.... ~ .
k f `. f ei ~ S ,~ S 4 ~~Gp ~g~,r's ~~ ~~t /r'~` :.: r~ ~ I l~ 3 1 `~ ~ c y, s ~ ,~
~~ X~~ ~ ~
~, i
~~ ~ toy ~ ~'si ~/ ~ ~.~ ~r `Jx " i ~ ~" ---^^a+ ~ti
,~. ~
i ~ t i _ ,.,~, :<, t ~
a ; ~tti _ _ ~r ~~ .-- i ~ ., cSc.I t
~"< , 1 ~I y li ~ `~ ~ ~ `'~~ 14_R _ ~ (t, r+t' ~ :-~ .4_e ~ y $~ ~~ -.X J~sc,,,,'\
'. -~. u
..~.
a "" ~ ~'"
~,-s' _ !t V~- y~~~~.~i
.:;.. .:~ v .~
tl 't
tV r ..._.., _..
\~
4
a
_r
t .
> ' I ~~~ ~~7
;~ ~~ ~.. ~~ x~i7~i ,, / A~ I ~U.
~ ~
c ~
~ ,
Itl ~ I ~ ~ _
C ~ ~ ~~ `S:^ ¢) w .
o ~ ~~
~,~ 4 F
~„
.~,
~ ~.
a
~t~ ...~ *(....,o
b ..,
..
i~ ( Y ~ "'~.,~^~./ d l~ i~(.~ ~".al"'~",~ . } ""` ~ g~ ~~ ~ a~r~)'~ t*r \~ t'~ ~ ,{, ' ~ F/{'~a~ ty'
;.
,.
~ ~ {.
-~ -- ; ~` -
~"~`: f `$~i• ~r , ,~~j~ ~c ~jv~~e,.wa. `j~/ ~~gp 7,SkT yr 1 ~. /^ ~, ~ ~ y~ +
s ~ ~ T
I_W..__ r `~ ., ~ ^, r
:~ ~'
~ \_. ( p ~ ti, ^ ~ ,gip ' .. .' a
y Y.
1 /(.y
- -, ~ ..r... ,.. ~ ., ,w il~~+c.1'
~~.
~i
~ ,1 } '" ~ 'q 3~~ ~~r. .~ ~ 7,
~; r
^.
a f
~6 ~ ~~~
~ N
i~
.. ,.,
_- ~ Y'
,, i ~'
1 ~~.._ ~ ~ ~ ~ c~
_~~^y.,~ t I 1 ~ ~
~ ~~ ` 1
`;,~ ~ ~` ~t 't~ _ fir
.~ ,
v 1
~~~ \ .t
... .~,._. ~~ r
..., i .ere i
a ld` \ I ~.
~ _ a, tl ..
at ~
„wav E..... .•~ ;wy~ Ir IfyC lrS ~, ~ wo,n` - 94 ~/-i,
w 1 .:
• i
_. . .. y;~'6 ( is*\IS .~+p~ ~ J ;: ~cr.~~ 5 < i \'t J ~~_ _ ',fit' Z~ •I~''~` ~ I ~ ~ ^~' ~ , t ~~~r~ .~ ~,\~\
^
a(
<« ~ ~. • .
,n
,~ i ».~. 1( ?~ ~~ `Ry.~ 1. -- mow. :)F ~ a ~~\ IG.,.} i~
~w
~., a r` ~ ~'r..
f t
`~
-~ ;.+ ''
,.K . __ }
~ .., O t0 Oo ~1 -~- rv~r, ~i V l~
q
trA ~.. 1. J~."~.4.~ lY';~
~MM/ yy
r
~f~ t {
' 11 x~ ' L ~ ~~.r il~.
F ~, i ~ t
' (;
` i
~ '~ t:~
5, ~,
~ i' `~ i
t .'' ( r
r ~, ~ ~, ;:
I
~c ~ M N; ~
y • :] '
alt ~~
a
~ s~ i uNi 'w~'~'X•; ~' x!' ,{' ~' ~"`'i~ o+.~,~-- ! ~ +.d+e. ~. .rte + ~ ~^ ~ ~ ~ ` .
_....
1 Ik ~~~. ~ tigs.`~'- . e« ._~I ~~. ` ~ .'"0....11 }yt't2w,_}14 •}°t} ~ *~s' i '
'' i ~ ~ i ~ 'q ~ ~ )~ aw ~q,-/~ I ~~! ~~,~ ~~~ ~(._ rte- "`~ ~l~ ~} ~'
// f % _~z ~ 411_._._.? ~~ ~~~~ ~~ ({(,y' -.~. ~~, t r ~~ ~ k Y~, Y..
/ ( t1' P
( l_ _ _m_ .1 t 3
\.1 1 ! ~~ t~:i , r~' A~ .~:: ~;.\~~?,err }~ ~ ,~~
v
-- .._ +s~'~q„
t ~j
,. a*i
~, ~ , `...
-
~i'~ =p r ~ tti i~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ I
~~
,. ~,
I 1 ~ ~ ~' ,~z~ ~ ~~
- a I <~ ~-
! ~ 7 ~ Y
,':
~,
,.~! r uwrw X15 L ~.~~. ~~ s) \ ~~,~ }' ,
t ,
(~ < 1 ..: ~ .`k s
y ~ e ~ ~ `-yam, ~O`1~~~. ^~ I
_.,.i
' 1~~ ~~ ~ ~
_.
f`` $ ..'}
--._-_ t ~ ~ ~~' .~ a
J
.'
+G ,
~t f3 Pt ~ ~' ¢ I `vim ~j ~-
55 f 'y S~(t i y ..
~M
._ ~.» ~ 1 ~;;i '~ } t ~' m ~ t 4 y ~`~,~L.~~ ~ j A! 1 i ~ 1 iS ..+nN'R ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ a*F.
r ; _ .~ _.f ~ ,. ~ ~- 1 , ~ ,;~.
i
.> w
t; M
_ ,
~ ~ / '~~ ; ~ 1~ ~ ~^~
P i r i'
rv r t
__ .!..
~/'1
\~
G
w
' ~.
--
'~;
_ ., ~~,
1 ~ ~Sy r~
~, ~. ~ ~° _. ~ ~ w ~ "'yl.. iii ~Fi ~~^ { ~~#~~ ;q I ~ -•~'~` ~ y, ..
~ k ~ ; ~~
:; ,.
..
~<
f
~ ! ~ {
1 ,~ i m ~ ` (' Ii '~ ~~y ~ ~Y ~~ ..fir ~ !! t ~4 ~ ~~ \~ I
'* ll lJ l
fit` r f
! ~. .. F ,O ~bMMA i I ft l 7+
~ ~ ~.@@@
y 1
\. yn
~~
__. .
__ _
,. _..w
..~
,,
.~
.~
,.
~ ~~ "'--1
\~,~ it ~~ ~ ,~~. a ~~, ~ ~ h ~~~
~~ !
~~ y ,r ~
r
~, ,
__
z _..
1
t~
~. ~
i
_._.. ..._._... ., .... I ~.
f ~
13 ( E
~f^ I
~ X ':' ly (C i ' f r
,_ I t ...
A #~Vf i- i ~ Z` r
~ - .~ . ~ W.
i
4 ~ I 1.. ~AI .I^ 1 $ r f JL ..
.n ~ f
F
ia.a ~.
l 1 1 ~ ~ I ,Y
~ O ~~ r. pit ,, _ ~~~ ~;~ - S
,: ~ i 6 _ j~
., . ~ ~ ~ ~ 'orb ~ _. ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~ ... ... ~4 ~~ ~ - ~~ ~ t~
~' ~ ~ .~~ ~ ~ f alt. .y A+#~ .{~.. ~~ !F`~ ~ ~s
1~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ > ~ )~,,,~ .
~.. ~ `'` r 's,
~ 3 ~,
t ; '~, '.
^~ ~ o co
00 ~ v ~~
rn
S W oPT~~ ~I
--- t, ~ ~ .. - __.. _._~ ~ r~>~-~-----~-- ~----~--~-~~ - ~: ~:
t~. ~ j/~~ ~ .' to war~w f~ i ~~ ~~.. ~ ~
.. ~ J. TN[ar4KNr ' - ~t ~'
%/i f ~kti '' ~ '~ ~ y ~~ _, ~ & ~II. \. .. 1 (gal U
_.: ~.
J
,~ : ~< ~i 5~ (~,., ~ ~s
t',;_ ~ ~~'~~ ~o- A I ~3 ~,,,w , ib
i _ // ~ PAitk J
r ~ ~ j YMN l K." ~~ ~(
'` ~ ~ ~ ,,, ~ ~' 'e~ ..,., (~
~~.
~,/ ~~ , ~ ~ ~ _ s ) r a
1 j 1 '~` I~ ~ i~ l t» -, v {
. ,f'' < _ e. « J ..,. ~ ~ ..rw .r ~+w j J J~~r q.*a~w~a ~,~;. - ~ ~ '>
*~ ,~I w,r: .I ~/ '+. ~ ~z5'~~~ ~ ~ ^'k, ~I; ~ wutcw,wtcH~.". ~_~ z
\'~ 1 -:,rir ~ /s .a„ ~/. ~L._~.:. ~~~ i ~~ ,{, ?;# if i~J{~ 1l''~7~ tq _ 1 J ~~~ ~ ~ .:
I( y/. /i 3~~/~.~y c'ry' ~6N ~~rF >rL 1p 1 r~",) "'Y't~~!~~~~( ~~~~.:... ~~r ~ u~.`.
~ .. , ~- ~ !
~1
r f `,, ~ \t~ ~~."~ . 1 ,~ M ',.~,~-~, `'~ ~`ry ~j,p~l ~llu~ 3 ,L'W~~.,% ^ ~~ +L`{ ,te`.srl
d~ 1 r ~• `~ ~, 'f '~'' ~ Att'~ ~rw .~~ __-1~ C ~Tr``~`"_.,.. nn+..xwu wr5~ '3 '' r,;r• " 3 H yv;:/t
~ ., ~ S L~ .. ~ l~ ~~rw.,r oY~~ " ~~r ~r 1I)I `b ~ r ~ -.._ ~~,'y~,~y{{ u...:~>~, ~ ws. ~ uyzxi ~ / ~,,,!' .,,,q'
~, i (`t - . ~, r ~ "'~5 sue: l ~ '1
t
~>/~ ,P/~cd ..w.,«~ it ( ! _ i~ r ~T ~ ~,,, r.,.: dllj re.warA.uwn i
~cs.iars ~f t
.f _'. i ~.. :yam k1 ~ - .. ~ I ~
r ~ ~ ~q
` r
a~'WIFi. I / ~ ~; f Ct.i]Mi g~l~ iI ..~ i! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ /M i /\ S' g II~\ { ~.
~-
`~` (1 3
-_..
1~~
~, s 1 i, , f ._ ,
~_~ _ __ . '
~4 ,f !cr ~' .J~ _ ~~r. - _) !. r l,~ It G.-.... _ uaa.r. w:rw- r ~t'~.R _ [
rant ^ t Ir ~ 1 ~ ~I__, wR.,:.! ~ +c:., 1 __.. .?. !~ c } . _.~ ""71~~,. ~.'~~ ~- ~'~`z~~; ~ .
~ I;
i rt«
~ ~~ .~ i ~ r ~,>
i ~ ~"
-~~ .~ ~ x
7 g ~ ~ w1+'~~° / ~ I i ~ ..t '
a ~~`9p ~ ~ ~Y ~~~l.c~, \~%~ ~'~~^ i n it I .~ .:`s~' ~.
~i #. f .r ~,:. ~ ..rr ,,
~~~~ I I 1~~~ , '~~~`° 1 ~ rrr f+ ~ r iii. ~ 21r ~l~ ~.
~> ~ .,
~G ~ a ~.
~ ~ ~ z, •f . ?~,~r , ~
~. FiNrtnwc,H ~'r~ tutw .~. a \ r = ~, !„~tI `1~ .+r- ••
etsr. i~ 4,C~. d ~~,, ~' tJ~ i ~<~ f• ~' ~~ ~~. ,.
__ ,
r 1 d
is 'r.. _1 t> ~ .~ ~aWT ~~,tO '~ ~<AY Iq TPA ~ ~ /~ Y W.W* ~ ~ 'itHr
t.. I'.~. . 1 v.:tu ~...,.
Y t.M t
,,~ 59 ; ~~
,~~ h
N ~ w ... NEiTi tn.
,'c'at
~. e ~ ,` J
,. +~ ~b ~caea~ ~ y is
~ ~. 33~ ~ s ~~~
i' !, if
~ ~~ i "~
t G. ~ ~~ ':%r ~
~'-'y r ~/
yq i
- { ~ P~ 1~~ t ~, ~~~
t
to ..__.
S W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Z
~.--~-. ---~~ ~ r ___ I
..,
J na Mc yr
.-`ti ~ ~ ~ nr i i '~ 3' l ~~"
~ `"j~ ° ~_ tit ` '/ ~ ... i ~~ 'M_~ )i~5~ (~ j
~~,., , r~ , , . r. , 3 ~, ~~ ~_ ~~ ~Tw.~
~. ~ -
.i ~ YYiW
s i=," .., l ~~ i
`~. ~ . ,1
,., •y
~A ~ I `_. _ - ~~ : i~
,' ~~~ -~ ~ i)~~ , , -
~. ,;
,,
,, ~ . Sv
4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ jic ~~r~. t, ,y .ai F ~nr - ._.. __~~ ,tea ~ ) ~~~ ~
\\ .• ^' (, R ~r ` < `+i t ~ "'~ nrr i. ~~ OL~1SlGNV4 ~`~ ~ - ~ r ~ ~
~ ~}j~
'± , ~ ~~ , } ~,, ~".% 4``~: `~,,,, ~I ~'1'6~' `~~ }~ t ~'n ~ t ,ewe" ~`r~J' ~ 4q ~~"'^..~ ~ / 1' ~, ,
,.
S } t ~ ~_ t 'ww, - i
v
j ~. -j.. ~ '-\*./- ra~f~ MrOG~ M ~ ~. 1 _ _. ~ ~ r "j r t t s?'~ +T{`- 2 wNS J~
,,.-~{ l~
~~
'r /"'~ ti Jy~ ~ ~% "' ~ R ~ ~ r~` r/`~~` ark "~r ~ ~ n
~ w ~ ~
~`/ ~r `~` ~ rr / ~L ~nw~ ~,~x 4i) ~'~ '~ ilsr~cr,,v y(Jl ~;~~°"' ~// t'1 ~ ~,.' n,(r~b!t ..
,, !i _ _.
g} d
~ ~`f~' ~U ~) ~'r of _ n,'~" °R~-~'~ yv~~ r_ ~ ~~ ~7~ .,~ ~,„ d ~ ~t r a L~~ ~, ! ~ ~ n
2 _
~~ r 'r°N. /~( ~ Yiyy ~i ~~~ ~1 ' `1~. ~'~ ~rf~~j`~'+~~ ~ l ~.~..1 i_ -a,~r rwa _ ~r~' %' a .i ~,
' . ~`.r ~, ~99~A , ~ $ ,i'_ L ,~9 "°~",~,v AAKi~MK y r ~snnwratiw / ~ 7
~ ~ _ i ~r a uenaxa..xa m /
/.
-r I y 1 aroa~ ~' ~ w. ~,, ~ >i 3,.a i -
' _ ,~ ~°
r. L...JL ~ )i. .~?.......... 1 - urr~rv '"' nd'.._, w.ri.. , ~» ~
y -.
-...
I~ ~ ~ ~r ti
l ~ ~~ _ ~) «,l ~ ail `x~'y_.krHC +~.~.
!/ I ( "ice ~ dj~ J ~' 6YS
~t~ ~~ ~ ra ~a ~ ,~ ~J~~ ~ ~') ~~~ l~ _~°~L91~ ,r~~brr_ 'F~~ " ~ s+~'~ 7f ~ 7 y ~~
li ~. a ~ ~ ~;~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~i~ P 1t'% ..~ . i A ~ ~. '
~ ! ' -- . - 1 a~nrt ~ f 3
,~ -
~~ ~ _.
~ ~ , `~,J ~~ ,~ ,i ,~~.
3 S J 4 ~~r'4 ~ 4
Y~ ~nK ~ ~ A~p~ ~ 3F ~ ~~~PF{IK .. w<a lJ~.._..,' ~ Gw ~~ rt ~~ 7 l
\ Q
1 ~` ~~,
»u.x y
{ ~. ~" ~.
:.. _JW_ t, i. ~i ,.J Cl_+IP w)KU :. r<:u ro Y] / Iil~~ ~ ~ J C ~:
~ iwr '
i \ 3
i
a
~ r ~~~ ;I` ~.i
;~; /r~~~~
' .~ )~ Bit - lI~J J / ,
~~ '
Kr j~~p^~~~, -~~Yr'S
~\'""% //
sw o~ i T~,~ ~3
t f ~ ~/' j~f ~ 1~ I ~1 '1 .
L ~ ~ '
err ~ ~
- ,
,rU~ ,, ~ ~ ~ ~q~0 1,
~ .,"
~ ~,. ~ .. ~ FW r
5t
31 rwi ~~ f
~ ~ \ 't
~ ,~ -r ~. ,. ~ ~ ~1-
,'t `:1\ ~~~ j;, ~ ~, I .I i , • l~ twit .,' \4 _.. (~ w ~ 1\ i,`! ~ 1 ~
i . ~ _ !; ~.~ ~ ~- }'/ /' '~. Rf! ~\ ~~ ~ /; 'uric 'i.~~ x`r'
Y
~ ~ F% < ~~ ~ ~, •. ~/ice Mp. ~ ~r ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ ~i ~~( tr• ,.,N,.w 4. a
t ~ . _ _ ! ~ ~ ~ ~.,r
- ~...., f -~ ~
~ ~~ * 3 ~ ~ S~~ ~~. ~ i ~ ~
~ S ~. 7 1 d + ) I
/~ s_~ 1 1
~`I
1. ~ r„ ~J,r* ~~, ~~ ~l t dr.) ~ ~/ ti../ ,,,. :'.sl Ii/~:.w^ i
i~ ~s F/ ~ i r f4 r ~i_;~ woo~uv~ ~:.'..P2 .~i~ I ~ ~~ ~ ~~~:; ..,~ ~s~ ~ ~ -_:: ;~w/.. ~
~l ~°~-. _ s __ r ,~t i
~~ ~ ~ ~ ., w ~3 ~ 40 S 'le ~. a 1 r-~ ;
.J'/~ 4i.-!/ 1 f y. ,~a ,,6~ ~(~-_-, `• N, ~vm_..y--~.;, c.~w, ~@~~?l.° n `'~+~y"~~ ~ t~~~ ~,t~ a
/~
r '+
,,f ~~ .1i 1( J~~ ur ~.,~~ ^~i YEA TTTS' i..:~t._.. *wu.w ~r wr:w. (,r A L ..
_.::i _.. .E i1 J, L .~.x
~! ci // ~~~ „~ ~ )~K'f i,-~~4 ~~ J.: ~I ~~ ~ '~~ 6~ o ~~ 4vef ~ ..... ...... ~~~. ,r .._ 1 a ~~-7.~ ,£' l~ ~~
r d :.w ~ .. y<k fir- tE .V7K ,:;N r. s. 9waa w.. t
~.~w . ~~ tt ,,,~% w«,
F^ ~ , l i ~ aw w[AOrwnr,x v,
~ ~~a"l ~ /~r.n f ~ ~ ~" i ~ 1 BLS ~ ~ .d6RJHI1.. ~ ~ ~ .y ~ ~ X 5 "°w+s r ~~~ , wx~orc m wwr 7 ~ r ° z a t+r~e^
/ ~ ) = ~ ~ l~ _ ~ ~? c
~}! b ,.
y
i
~ k r ji ~i I cru.wyii - i ~~. ~Liw..^, wk ~~ -
x ~.}
vshn~ 1
.~ i ~ 1 , ~ ,~` , ° ..,~ ~ ~ ,
`5 t ~ ~~;~ "" o- ~~ ~ ~ ~~ x
~~~ ~ / =
J y ' ' el~ i~ O +yf j_ f
~~~ , r I f ~.
~~ ! wx,+~ Tj y`:": t, i ,i ~li '~~ r., ^~`#Sv. (~~ ~ q~~y ~{" 1n ~I ~...ti O~, .f (...\ .'i }ri) ~I
Y '30 ( ~ ', ~~ ~ J EII ~°.Jj ~! ~i I ~~~ '"t~ ~~i S`i~ 'x""`x~~ a .aa'~7 ~i
y.w ~ I ~f ~:
9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~t
d8 ~l~ f ~ ' ~
GIMNAYC~N ~ ~ ~ Cg 1t,,7 ~') (~ \) ~ (JJj aI
lNn4 ~i) l'1~~,~ l ( ~P~ ~'C i,~MYPU~IR i WIE ;/' r ^~ tai/i J' ~~ W° .r i ;~a ~ w?;.i
~:
~,
5 i i I
- _- -
a .jl ~ '~~ f~ ~' 4 - ._ ft~ ~ j' ~?. ~..
w,> > > ,~
~~.
t ,; /,~
~~~,, . ~ ,
}~.~ -'
`~, ~ _a,
~~ 1
.., ~ raw 1 7 1 ..., , f~ 17~,
i ~ //i~7Y ~.~ <
n
Y ~ ~.
__~
0 9 1a 11 1Z
~ 8
7 8
14 15
`{ 16
17
13
1 1e 1 10
0 12
11 y
18
~ x
~ as
a
N
g
>e ss
n
21
19
z4
sa m x u
Jl
3000 0 3000 6000 Feet
Identified Sites
Identified Potential Site
Eagan Boundary N
Water
N Street Centerline
Map prepared by City of Eagan Community Development Department L:~users~commdev~projecls~Compplan2000~compplan2000_2_apr
City of Eagan, MN 04-Apr-02
Identified Potential Soccer Field Sites
County Assessed Value
Map Property Owner Name/ Land Use Plan
ID Owner Address Land Value Bldg Value Acres Zoning Designation
1 FERN PEDERSON $15,000 $0 5.2 I-1 SA
6616 UNION LAKE TRL
LONSDALE MN 55046-0324
2 FERN PEDERSON $15,80D $0 5.1 I-1 SA
6616 UNION LAKE TRL
LONSDALE MN 55046-4324
3 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM $86,900 $0 26.1 I-1 SA
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1672
4 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV SERV $308,600 $25,691,400 15.5 I-1 IND
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1634
5 NORTHERN STATES POWER CO $348,400 $1,152,400 6.2 I-1 IND
PROPERTY TAX DEPT
414 NICOLLET MALL
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401-1993
6 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV SERV $495,400 $1,600,000 32.9 I-1 IND
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1634
7 BCBSM INC $2,333,500 $250,000 9.0 PD O/S
3535 BLUE CROSS RD
P O BOX 645609
SAINT PAUL MN 55122-1154
8 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 551 01-1 672
9 CITI-CARGO & STORAGE CO INC
3775 HWY 13
EAGAN MN 55122-1034
$315,100 $148,500
$720,800 $0
10 METRO WASTE CONTROL COMM
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1672
$115,000 $0
14.9 I-1 IND
12.7 I-1 IND
3.4 I-1 IND
11 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
ADMINISTRATIVE 8 FINANCIAL SERVICES
230 5TH ST E
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-1634
$365,000 $0 11.9 I-1 IND
12 PATRICK MCCARTHY
1275 DEERWOOD DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-1425
$1,229,300 $0 34.5 A LD
13 WEST PUBLISHING CO $2,481,600 $0 82.7 PD IND
GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
14 GOPHER SMELTING &REFINING CO $598,600 $0 21.1 PD IND
3385 HWY 149
EAGAN MN 55121-2395
15 WEST PUBLISHING CO $1,078,800 $0 36.0 PD IND
GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
Page 1 of 2
Map Property Owner Name/
ID Owner Address
16 WEST PUBLISHING CO
% GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
610 OPPERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
17 YMCA OF GREATER ST PAUL
476 ROBERT ST N
SAINT PAUL MN 55101-2278
18 WEST PUBLISHING CO
GORDON J MARSHIK TAX DIRECTOR
61 C C^PERMAN DR PO BOX 64526
EAGAN MN 55123-1340
19 EDWARD G III ATSINGER
4880 SALT:, ROSA RD STE 300
CAMARILLO CA 93012-0958
County Assessed Value
Land Use Plan
Land Value Bldg Value Acres Zoning Designation
$589,700 $0 11.8 I-1 IND
$916,900 $3,583,100 21.1 I-1 IND
$274,400 $0 6.6 I-1 IND
$140,500 $186,200 2.8 LB O/S
20 EDWARD G III ATSINGER $828,900 $0 16.5 LB O/S
4880 SANTA ROSA RD STE 300
CAMARILLO CA 93012-0958
21 WEIERKE TRENCHINGB EXCAV CO $50,000 $76,300 2.4 A LD
660 CLIFF RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2008
22 WEIERKE TRENCHING& EXCAV $49,000 $0 1.9 A LD
660 CLIFF RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2008
23 ROGER F WEIERKE $62,700 $111,700 2.0 A LD
630 CLIFF RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2008
24 DAVID T FORSMAN $97,500 $169,600 3.6 A LD
4640 DODD RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-2109
25 DALE F & DOROTHY A TESSMER $112,500 $134,600 4.6 A LD
4650 DODD RD
SAINT PAUL MN 55123-21 D9
26 NWA INC $1,169,500 $0 21.5 A SA
DEPT A4450
5101 NORTHWEST DR
SAINT PAUL MN 55111-3034
27 DAKOTA COMMUNITIES INC $101,100 $0 3.1 A SA
680 ONEILL DR
EAGAN MN 55121-1535
28 CCPRE EAGAN $4,325,800 $19,974,200 83.4 PD SA
%WAM!NET INC ATTN: CONTROLLER
655 LONE OAK DR
EAGAN MN 551 21-1 560
Page 2 of 2