No preview available
 /
     
07/06/2021 - City Council Finance Committee Finance Committee Meeting Tuesday, July 6, 2021 4:30 PM Red Fox Conference Room Eagan City Hall Agenda I. Agenda Adoption II. Review Park Facility Improvement Funding Options III. 2022-2023 Budget and ARPA Funds Update IV. Other Business V. Adjournment Agenda Information Memo July 6, 2021, Finance Committee Meeting II. Review Park Facility Improvement Funding Options DIRECTION TO BE CONSIDERED: Review and comment on the plan for park facility improvement options Facts and Topics for Discussion  The City Council discussed at its April 2021 retreat the various park facility improvement needs and funding options, including the possibility of conducting a referendum that if approved would allow for the sale of bonds to provide funding.  The City Council directed the Finance Committee to research with Staff the various scheduling options for such a referendum and priorities for the park facility improvements. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECTED COSTS Costs projected below are in a range of bond amounts from a low end of $38 million and a higher amount of $47 million. These two figures were used to provide the estimated tax impacts noted below. Costs of goods, labor and material are at an all-time high, with some predications suggesting a slow down over the next 18 months. A.) Eagan Community Center: add space for senior programs, add fitness/wellness related space, create another elevator for easier access to the lower level from main entry, update indoor playground significantly, replace all mechanical systems in the building, reconstruct the front desk for more functional access, and create possible additional space for storage and for the ECVB. The ECC improvements have an updated cost estimate of $10,000,000 B.) Eagan Art House: demo the current structure and rebuild an approximate 10,000 square foot facility that would integrate an Art house feel with efficient mechanical operations and have a quality multipurpose opportunity to it for added facility rental options for the community and create unique and creative indoor/outdoor spaces. The Art House rebuild has an updated cost estimate of $15,000,000 C.) Eagan Civic Arena: update and create more function in the lobby spaces, update locker room facilities to allow for additional showers to be installed, update and increase multipurpose spaces, enhance facility mechanical systems, and create more flexibility in facility use. The Civic Arena improvements have an updated cost estimate of $5,500,000 (Partnership on an outdoor hockey rink is currently in process. The above Civic Arena costs were reduced from a previous report, as the outdoor hockey rink will meet a certain need, and is being accomplished in partnership, including a significant donation.) D.) Cascade Bay: install entry feature as people come into the park – similar to entry fountains, update concessions building, create a large rentable cabana in island of the lazy river, possibly install more adult related hot tubs into the hillside of the park (may be more challenging and costly than first anticipated), and create private cabana related items along the south border of the park to enhance private rental opportunities. The Cascade Bay improvements have an updated cost estimate of $3,000,000. This number has gone down because of recent investments at the park during the COVID shutdown. E.) Indoor athletic facility: Through staff’s research and experience, there are multiple ways this could be achieved – most affordably a dome like structure over an athletic field. A more significant option could be a permeant structure that would have greater energy efficiency and offer year-round use on bad weather days in Minnesota. The cost for such a facility could be a wide range from $5M to more than $50M pending size and complexity. In the last discussion with the entire council, this particular item was identified as an item that has been discussed for years, but the option to consider moving forward may depend on a partner to help with the construction and/or operations costs. To date, we have not received any groups that have come forward with a partnership option yet, nor have we announced partnership opportunities for such a facility. The “dome” option facility has an updated cost estimate of $6,000,000 to $12,000,000; depending on the size, location and the quality of soils, parking and other mitigation efforts needed at the selected site. TIMING FOR POSSIBLE REFERENDUM  Projected cost for special election is at least $30,000  Earliest for a referendum would be November 2022 election IMPLICATIONS OF A REFERENDUM ON THE 2022/2023 BUDGETS  Special election funding  Consultant expenses  Informational Material FINANCIAL IMPACT OF REFERENDUM PARTNERSHIPS UNDER CONSIDERATION  Staff will discuss further at the Finance Committee Meeting NEXT STEPS AND OTHER CONSIDERATIONS  Joint meeting of the City Council and APrC is scheduled for the September 14, 2021 Special City Council meeting workshop on September 14  Check in with the full City Council (Consider at the August Workshop, in concert with budget discussion)  Do we attempt to fund the Art House project with state bonding money, either in whole or part?  Is there a time that we solicit, and how for partnerships for an indoor athletic turf facility? Even with a third of the overall cost raised by a partner, is this a possibility. OTHER possible ideas could be to do a low-cost, long term lease and work with a private contractor to build and operate an Property Type Value $ 39M $ 47M Residential Homestead 336,005$ 82$ 99$ Commercial 1,000,000$ 481$ 580$ * Assumes 20 year bonds at TIC 2.35% Bond Issuance size* Estimated Annual Tax impact to Residential and Commercial Property athletic bubble for the community. Other possible regionally located sports venues could also provide this support to where the city would not require building this specific facility.  Do we engage a professional firm and/or consultant to help navigate a referendum plan for the City?  Begin the process of soliciting partnerships for certain parks facilities improvements – what would a partnership for a facility look like? Could something be done through a regional state bond funded facility for local needs?  Each project will have its own planning, design, and engagement opportunities to be certain we can meet the majority of the City’s needs with this effort.  Shall the focus include special election or general election day, 2022 (later?) Agenda Information Memo July 6, 2021, Finance Committee Meeting III. 2022/2023 Budget and ARPA Funds Update Staff will provide a status update on the 2022/2023 budget process and the American Rescue Plan Act Funds.